Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013-02-05_COUNCIL MEETING
Ii. AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FEBRUARY S, 2013 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013, Closed Session of January 22, 2013 and Work Session of January 22, 2013 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 01/24/13 , TOTAL $1,218,555.04; and Pre -List Dated, 01/31/2013, TOTAL $828,417.54 C. Resolution No. 2013 -18 Approving Lot Division, 5700 And 5712 Grove Street D. Browndale Avenue Bridge Scour Repairs, Contract No. ENG13 -6NB E. Request For Purchase —Two Smithco Sand Rakes, Braemar Golf Course F. Request For Purchase — Personal Protective Equipment, Fire Department G. Approval of 2013 Minnesota Pay Equity Implementation Report V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: It Agenda/Edina City Council February 5, 2013 - Page 2 • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Variance Appeal, 5801 Crescent Terrace, Continue To February 19, 2013 VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During. "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't.s/ated:for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor_. may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Sketch Plan Review, 4412 Morningside Road And 4232 Oakdale Avenue B. Resolution No. 2013 -17 Calling For A Public Hearing On A Project By Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis C. New Wine & Beer Licenses – Hello Pizza, 3904 Sunnyside Road D. Neighborhood Boundaries And Names And The Related Neighborhood Association Policy E. City Manager Employment Agreement F. City of Edina And Edina Public Schools Partnership Goals G. Memorandum Of Understanding With Edina Crime Prevention Fund, Fall Into The Arts Festival IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Veterans Memorial Committee, October 19, 2012 2. Planning Commission, January 9, 2013 3. Human Rights And Relations Commission, November 27, 2012 14• Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues �s jes Tues Tues Agenda/Edina City Council February 5, 2013 Page 3 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of January 22, 2013 III. Resolution No. 2013 -02 Authorizing Purchase Agreement For Property At 3930 West 49 '/: Street, (Favorable Vote Of Majority Of Commissioners Present To Approve) IV. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Feb 5 Closed Session — Real Estate Acquisitions 5:00 P.M. Feb 5 Work Session - Legislative Update 5:30 P.M. Feb 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Feb 12 ULI New Normal Workshop 6:00 P.M. Feb 18 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Feb19 Work Session —Jnt Meeting Art Center Board & Wk Groups 5:30 P.M. Feb 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mar 5 Work Session —Joint Meeting With Planning Commission 5:30 P.M. Mar 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Mar 20 Work Session —Joint Meeting With Community Health Com 5:30 P.M. Mar 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Apr 2 Work Session — Business Meeting 5:30 P.M. Apr 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Apr 16 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. Apr 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. COMMUNITY ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 22, 2013 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the consent agenda as revised to table Item IV.F. Special Assessment Agreements — Richmond Hills Park, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of January 8, 2013 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 10, 2013, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $194,785.59; General Debt Service Fund $425.00; City Hall Debt Service $2,100.00; PIR Debt Service Fund $300.00; Working Capital Fund $24,250.27; Equipment Replacement Fund $32,274.21; Art Center Fund $1,648.91; Aquatic Center Fund $558.24; Golf Course Fund $15,602.09; Ice Arena Fund $82,418.94; Edinborough Park Fund $20,852.85; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $12,655.88; Liquor Fund $176,172.39; Utility Fund $382,527.42; Storm Sewer Fund $501.69; PSTF Agency Fund $422.26; TOTAL $947,495.74 and for approval of payment of claims dated January 17, 2013, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $332,464.96; Police Special Revenue $605.62; Working Capital Fund $8,364.15; Equipment Replacement Fund $7,197.59; Art Center Fund $2,047.12; Golf Dome Fund $71,037.22; Aquatic Center Fund $463.82; Golf Course Fund $6,536.06; Ice Arena Fund $218,411.10; Edinborough Park Fund $6,879.73; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $11,909.93; Liquor Fund $204,334.06; Utility Fund $132,000.55; Storm Sewer Fund $1,714.17; PSTF Agency Fund $6,277.59; Centennial TIF District $5,613.84; Payroll Fund $3,389.63; TOTAL $1,019,247.14; and, Credit Card Transactions dated November 27 — December 26, 2012; TOTAL $19,566.79 IV.C. Approve Addendum to Golden Valley Dispatch Contract IV.D. Approve 2013 Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington Language Correction IV.E. Accept Traffic Safety Report of December 12, 2012 IV.F. Table Special Assessment Agreements — Richmond Hills Park to February 19, 2013 IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -11, purchase of easement and condemnation of land for removal of Lift Station No. 1 IV.H. Request for Purchase, 2013 GMC Sierra 4WD Vehicle, Public Works, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Nelson Auto Center at $24,666.67 IV.I. Approve lease agreement for use of radio equipment on community water tower IV.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -13 approving removal of Remarketing Agent for Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Apartment Project), Series 2004 and appointment of successor Remarketing Agent IVX Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -15 accepting Urban Area Security Initiative Grant (UAS 110- 00732) IV.L. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -16 accepting Emergency Management Performance Grant (OMB - A133) Page 1 r Minutes /Edina City Council /January 22, 2013 IV.M. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -10 supporting grant application, Hennepin County HRA for Supplemental Transit - Oriented Development Funds, Edina Medical Plaza Project,'-6500 France Avenue Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland .Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. Vt. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD- Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDARIES AND NAMES AND THE RELATED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION POLICY - COUNCIL.ACTION POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 5, 2013 Hope Melton, Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee Chair, introduced the following Committee members: Dick Brozic, Bruce Carlson, Laura Ericksen, Rob Erickson, Paula Harter, Bob Miller and Bob Moore. She stated that Bright Dornblaser, Jennifer Janovy and Gene Persha also served on the committee. Ms. Melton presented a summary of the Name Your Neighborhood final report including the mission and purpose of this effort, the process used, and community participation. Laura Ericksen, Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee Member, presented neighborhood names boundaries proposed for the Northeast Quadrant. Ms. Ericksen explained the Sunnyslope neighborhood was recommended for inclusion with the Country . Club neighborhood based on the. number of households, population, types of housing.. stock, size of the. area, and. to prevent an orphan area. The same 'considerations were used with the Chowen Park neighborhood to include the area ��no h of the Minnehaha Creek. } "^ nded- "^ -U^d arses a-Rd PF9pesed RRMPr, were aPPF0priate-. The Council acknowledged that neighborhood association .,policy would define how neighborhoods could request changes to names or boundaries. Bruce Carlson, Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee Member, presented neighborhood names boundaries proposed for the Northwest Quadrant. Bob Moore, Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee Member, presented neighborhood names boundaries proposed for the Southeast Quadrant. Rob. Erickson, Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee Member, presented neighborhood names boundaries proposed for the Southwest Quadrant. The Council applauded the efforts of the Committee and residents for working on this project to enhance a sense of community. It was noted that while the terms. of legal notification would remain the same, identifying neighborhoods . would increase the City's ability to communicate with its residents beyond the requirements(ofllega'l notification and when,no legal notice was required. Ms. Melton clarified it was not the intent to create another level of representation or to require formalization of neighborhood associations. She explained that organized neighborhood associations already in existence could remain unchanged if they so choose without becoming a City- recognized association. Assistant. Manager Kurt reviewed the proposed policy and answered questions of the Council relative to the. formulation of the policy. The Council :acknowledged the intent of policy formation was that the proposed bylaws would relate to communication, notice, and leadership, creating transparency of an organization that was voluntary. If the City, was going to recognize a neighborhood associations to Page 2 Minutes Edina City Council /January 22, 2013 communicate with a broader neighborhood through that organization, there was a e need for a certain foundation of organizational sufficiency to assure everyone within that geographic area was iFepFesentedlincludediininoighborhood,meetiggs,and�com munications. ie City, 'it euld se indic -ate. The Council questioned what vwould ihappen cif an existing meighborhoc rganization determined it did not ;want to become,a s,Ubset,ofa [bigger neighborhood ibut ;instead wante -communicate directly with the .city. -Assistant Manager Kurt zeplied that'lack (of ;a formal channel cou lake that difficultr— Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Public Testimony Brant Pallazza, 4804 West Sunnyslope'Road, addressed the Council. John Currie, 4929 West Sunnyslope Road, addressed the Council. Steven Buss, 4904 East Sunnyslope Road, addressed the Council. Lee McGrath, 4619 Moorland Avenue, addressed the Council. Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, addressed the Council. Joe Eilers, 4809 Hilltop Lane, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council indicated public input was an important component of "Name Your Neighborhood" process and would assist in the determination whether to adopt in whole or in part this recommendation at its February 5, 2013, meeting. The public was encouraged to provide additional comment in writing prior to the next meeting. VI. B. VACATION REQUEST, ROADWAY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO 5205 BENTON AVENUE –RESOLUTION NO. 2013-12 ADOPTED Engineer Presentation Engineer Houle presented the request of Jeanne Nordby, the owner of 5205 Benton Avenue, to vacate the adjacent 30 -foot road easement that had been dedicated and deeded to the City by this property owner in 1957 for street purposes. He noted that in addition to vacating the easement, the property would also need to be transferred back to Ms: Nordby::Mr. Houle advised. private and public utilities had been contacted and staff recommended the City retain an easement over the` westerly ten feet for utility purposes. The Council discussed the request and acknowledged the desirability for the. City to maintain an inventory of City rights -of -way for potential sidewalk pathways. However, there was no current plan fora pedestrian way within this intra -City block'. Mr. Houle answered questions of the Council relating to placement of utilities. It was noted that the Nordbys had not paid taxes on this 30 -foot strip of land since it had been deeded to the City in 1957. City Attorney Knutson clarified the consideration was whether to vacate the City's interest and since it held fee Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 22, 2013 4 title, whether or not to transfer the title for the property back to the Nordbys. Mr. Knutson advised the Council if it wished, could sell the property. The Council acknowledged this property had originally been gifted by the adjacent homeowner (Nordbys) and the action under consideration would return it to the Nordbys with the City retaining a ten -foot easement. Proponent Presentation Chris Nordby, 7051 West 110`h Street Circle, Bloomington, representing Jeanne Nordby, stated his parents became owners of the entire lot in 1953. When they requested a lot split in 1957 to build a new home, the City indicated it wanted a street easement on the westerly 30 feet. His parents gave the City a quit claim deed and received compensation of $1., Mr. Nordby indicated they were not aware of any utilities that encroached within the 30 7foot property, which his parents had maintained for 60 years at no cost to the City. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. Public Testimony Reynald Baribault, 5904 Code Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,.Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -12, Property Owner Reassignment. Member Sprague seconded the.motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland - Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT Lee McGrath, 4619 Moorland Avenue, addressed the Council regarding civil forfeiture process. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-14 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -14 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. EDINA SWIM CLUB RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT - .LOWERED TO 60% Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh reviewed the Council's 2011 action to g continuing the Edina Swim Club as the youth sports organization having primary access to City -owned swimming facilities and approving the Priority Use of the Edina Aquatic Center Facilities Policy and Relationship Document with a 75% residency requirement. Ms. Kattreh indicated that in December of 2012, the Edina Swim Club expressed concern with meeting the residency requirement and requested the requirement be lowered to 60 %. The Council indicated that while Edina Swim Club representatives were in attendance, it would rely on staff's report and recommendation sinceifhis,wasnot,a ; publiclhearing and inotice and opportunity to speak had not been given to others who might Jike to comment, include irepresentatives of the Aquajets ht at would be foreclosed from the opportunity to speak its position or provide input at tonight's meeting. Page 4 c q Minutes /Edina City Council /Januarv22, 2013 Ms. Kattreh answered questions of the Council, indicating the Edina Swim Club had committed to an annual Edinborough Park pool rental fee of $53,000 per year and total pool rental equaling $126,000 per year. Prior to that recent agreement, the Edina Swim Club was committed'to $10- 12,000 per year. Ms. Kattreh indicated 71% of current Edina Swim Club participants were Edina _residents; under age 12, 85% were Edina residents; over age 12, 52% were Edina residents; and, over age 14, 41% were Edina residents. She explained there were not enough Edina competitive swimmers to make up the difference. In addition, the Edina Swim Club had full -time paid professional staff, coaches, and administrators, which was significantly different from other athletic associations that had a higher residency requirement: The Council considered what had changed since nine months ago when it and the Edina Swim Club had agreed a 75% residency requirement. Ms. Kattreh stated her understanding the Club's problem meeting the residency requirement was a combination of issues She said the Edina Swim Club reported their recordkeeping had improved significantly. - the Club found their membership numbers vacillate during the year, and the Edina Swim Club had honestly stated it was not sure of its residency numbers when this was discussed last year. Ms. Kattreh said the Edina Swim Club reported their membership residency was at 71 %. Ms. Kattreh stated the Club had hoped expanded hours at Edinborough Park pool -and improved marketing would benefit its feeder program and increase participation by Edina residents. Ms.. Kattreh explained the Edina Swim Club hoped the residency requirement would not limit its ability to attract high quality swimmers or compete in regional.and national competitions. At the request of the Council, Ms. Kattreh reviewed the current swim hours for the Edina Swim Club and Aquajets, noting if the lower residency requirement was not approved, the major impact would be priority use at the Aquatic Center this summer and use of about two hours per day. Ms, Kattreh stated the status of those two hours would be up to the.Aquatic Center Manager but staff would recommend maintaining status quo. It was noted the residency requirement was taken once per year and staff would use an average since monthly numbers fluctuate significantly. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving a change in Edina Swim Club residency requirement from 75% to 60 %. Mayor Hovland and Member Sprague indicated that while they supported the Edina Swim Club, concern remained with this request being made just nine months after agreement had been reached following a complete vetting process that included balanced input from the Edina Swim Cub and Aquajets. In addition, it was felt a higher residency requirement incentivized organizations to seek out Edina residents. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson Nays: Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. BIDS FOR COUNTRYSIDE PARK RENOVATION —AUTHORIZED Ms. Kattreh reviewed the past consideration of improvements to Countryside Park and requested authorization: to advertise for bids to complete the Master Plan project. Gabrielle Grinde, landscape architect with Hoisington Koegler, 123 North Third Street, Minneapolis, presented the Countryside Park Master Plan approved in 2008 and its evolution to the current Master Plan. She described the features and playground equipment to be included and cost summary estimate of $1,0235,000. Jill Bills, architect with SGN Wendel, 111 Washington Avenue North, Minneapolis, presented the Countryside Park shelter plan. Ms. Grinde and Ms. Bills answered questions of the Council related to playground and trail features. Ms. Kattreh stated appreciation for the assistance of the Countryside Neighborhood Association and support for an accessible playground structure, which she hoped would become the City's standard. She indicated the existing play structure would be donated and advised of the time schedule with completion in October.. Ms. Grinde reviewed points of access into the park and described the location of ballfield Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /Januarv:22, 2013 seating. Staff was encouraged to keep in mind the need for trees to provide shade during summer baseball viewing. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, authorizing staff to advertise for bids for the Countryside Park Renovation. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS W.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX. B. MINUTES: _ 1. ART CENTER BOARD MINUTES, NOVEMBER 15, 2012 2. COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE, OCTOBER 17, 2012 3. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 15, 2012 4. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 8, 2012 S. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD. MINUTES, DECEMBER 11, 2012 6. PARK BOARD, DECEMBER 11, 2012 7. PLANNING COMISSION, DECEMBER 12, 2012 Informational; no action required. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:51 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 5, 2013. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the January 22, 2013, meeting available. Page 6 r MINUTES OF THE CLOSED WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 22, 2013 5:05 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. Answering roll call were: Members Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; and consultants Jack Rice, Real Estate Consultant, and Lisa Diehl, Diehl Partners, LLC. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to move into closed session to discuss potential real estate acquisitions at 5:06 p.m. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett entered the meeting at 5:11 p.m. Economic Development Manager Neuendorf and Consultant Rice updated the Council on the potential purchase of the property at 3930 West 49% Street. Mr. Neuendorf and Consultant Diehl also reported on the potential purchase of the property at 3944 West 49%: Street. The Council and staff discussed the level of interest, timing and potential purchase terms for eachproperty. Member Swenson made a motion to adjourn the closed session and reconvene the work session at 5:35 p.m. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 5, 2013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 22, 2013 5:36 P.M. CALL TO ORDER /ROLL CALL Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:36 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Attending from the Donations & Naming Working Group of the Park Board were: Chair Ellen Jones, Andy Otness and Bob Kojetin. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Susan Faus, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director; Ann Kattreh, Parks and Recreation Director; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; and Scott Neal, City Manager. Working Group Chair Jones reviewed the Draft Naming and Dedication of City Facilities and the Donations policies with the Council. She noted the group is recommending adoption of a formal donations policy, a citywide donations application and acceptance agreement, a pamphlet and public relations /outreach encouraging donations, including volunteer time, a separate sponsorship and advertising policy, and enhanced recognition to be more encouraging of donations and consistent in the handling of them. It would be helpful to inform residents how decisions would be made relative to naming of city facilities, the potential for recognition of donations and potential sunsets of naming. She pointed out that the draft r policy, defined various terms that ri would, if adopted, t have aa- standardized meaning �— dam. The Council and Working Group members discussed various aspects. of .the proposed donations poolli y +es including use of the Edina Community Foundation as a conduit for handling donations, handling of pledged gifts and receipt of a pledged gift, and recognition of gifts. guying, timing of pledges ^ ^d *-W -' reeempt of the ^Iedged „ iffl ` ed .. fuFtheF detail befe side, atie of the draft .,li., .Id be ..d.,r ake-, `;On naming GIs. Jones noted that one of every five Edina parks has been renamed in the past 50 years, most of them fo atired city officials. She added that research showed that natural and historic names had more "bonding ower for residents. The Working Group was recommending more deliberation in the naming of cit� icilities, the passage of time and public input before a city facility was named or renamed after a person nd consideration of branding, place- making and naming - related donations. It was agreed that other citie <. olicies be reviewed in further detail before reconsideration of the draft policies.' Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 5, 2013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 1123/2013 7:44:32 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 1/24/2013 —1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367633 112412013 100609 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIA 622.00 2013 MEMBERSHIP DUES 306335 7 -831 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL 622.00 367634 112412013 127125 AAKER, KRIS 62.16 NOV -DEC MILEAGE 306519 123112 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 29.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306611 011713 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 91.54 367635 112412013 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 156.96 HOSE, CAMS 00005897 306336 1- 846001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 156.96 367636 112412013 124613 ABM JANITORIAL. NORTH CENTRAL 2,782.41 JAN 2013 SERVICE 306801 4782360 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,782.41 367637 1/24/2013 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 444.60 UB TEMP 306337 37092279 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 382.95 UB TEMP 306401 36815480 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 827.55 367638 1/2412013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 77.20 306638 1646181 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 77.20 367639 1124/2013 130090 ALL IANT ENGINEERING INC. 806.09 WAY FINDING PHASE 1 306768 53768 44008.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN P21 50TH&FRANCE CENTER RAMP 330.00 BICYCLE BLVD DESIGN 306769 53759 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 1,136.09 367640 112412013 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 350.00 ROLLOFF SERVICE 306770 3067337 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 34,192.80 RECYCLING 306771 3068008 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 34,542.80 367641 112412013 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 49.40 ART WORK SOLD 306465 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 49.40 367642 112412013 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 8.66 SEALANTS 00005980 306697 AFS- 230140041 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/24/2013 — 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES AMBULANCE FEES INSURANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDINGS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TRAINING AIDS 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 2 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ENGINEERING GENERAL EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 8.66 367643 112412013 100665 AMSAN 27.53 SQUEEGEE BLADES 306698 280242223 1646.6406 27.53 367644 112412013 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 563.78 COPIER PAPER 306430 10349141 -00 1550.6406 837.15 COPIER PAPER 306520 10349234 -00 1550.6406 1,400.93 367645 1124/2013 131506 ANDERSON, DORIS 25.61 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 306626 011713 1470.4329 25.61 367646 112412013 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 5,837.78 COMMERCIAL PACKAGE POLICY 306772 6100000140912 1550.6200 5,837.78 367647 112412013 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 483.32 FOOD 306456 1862847 5730.5510 745.07 FOOD 306629 1862768 5761.5510 1,228.39 367648 112412013 118491 APPLE INC. 639.11 IPAD 00004303 306431 4225007021 1260.6406 639.11 367649 112412013 131089 AQUATIC ROCK FORMATIONS LLC 4,115.00 GROTTO/WATERFALLPROJECT 306464 1291 5700.1720 4,115.00 367650 1124/2013 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 291.29 COFFEE 306699 1055944 7411.6406 446.02 COFFEE 306802 425685 1550.6406 737.31 367651 112412013 101368 ARMSTRONG MEDICAL INDUSTRIES 1 2,587.63 AIRWAY MANAGEMENT TRAINERS 00003547 306605 154743801 1470.6579 2,587.63 367662 112412013 103220 ASCAP GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES AMBULANCE FEES INSURANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDINGS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TRAINING AIDS 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 2 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ENGINEERING GENERAL EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 306639 76686200 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 97.74 306640 87888800 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 203.10 306641 76686300 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 306643 327.00 2013 LICENSE FEE 306630 100003640247 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 306644 76685700 327.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 123.55- 306645 367663 1124/2013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 120537 ASSOCIATION OF MINN BUILDING 0 933.28 400.00 MEMBERSHIP 2013 306432 2013 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 400.00 ART WORK SOLD 306466 011413 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD 367664 112412013 105605 ATSSA 367659 112412013 115067 BENSON, RON PAUL 82.50 DUES - DAVE SNAZA 306700 90065956 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART WORK SOLD 306467 82.50 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 367655 112412013 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 367660 112412013 125139 BERNICK'S 101.26 BATTERIES 00001598 306701 016- 291323 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101.26 473.00 306646 37525 5862.5514 367656 112412013 1.064.25 118955 BCBS OF MN 340.92 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 306628 KATHLEEN 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES TINSETH 340.92 367657 112412013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1123/2013 7:44:32 Page - 3 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE INSPECTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 376.55 306639 76686200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 97.74 306640 87888800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 203.10 306641 76686300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 311.60 306642 76685800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 31.29 306643 87888600 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 36.55 306644 76685700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 123.55- 306645 76571200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 933.28 367658 1124/2013 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 592.15 ART WORK SOLD 306466 011413 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 592.15 367659 112412013 115067 BENSON, RON PAUL 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 306467 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 367660 112412013 125139 BERNICK'S 591.25 306538 37528 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 473.00 306646 37525 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1.064.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1123/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 4 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367661 112412013 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 233.00 COFFEE 306521 1064580 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 233.00 367662 112412013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 226.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306702 OE- 307606 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 45.69 LABELS 306773 WO- 820665 -1 1550.6046 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 159.93 FOLDERS 306774 WO- 820979 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20.30 PLANNER 306775 WO- 821290 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 40.36 FOLDERS 306776 OE- 306323 -1 1550.6406 GENERA_ L SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 493.12 367663 112412013 125209 BISEK, KATIE 13.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306433 2013 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 201.47 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306497 NOV -DEC 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 214.47 367664 112412013 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 19.99 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 306703 011413 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19.99 367665 1124/2013 100666 BMI GENERAL LICENSING 327.00 MUSIC LICENSE 00002387 306631 23090386 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 327.00 367666 112412013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 68.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306402 80758 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 12.06 306403 80853 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 44.66- 306404 5650CM 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 48.62- 306405 5670CM 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 37.06 306406 81667 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 33.10 306407 81740 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 68.56 306408 62619 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 82.54 306409 82917 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 11.88- 306410 5280CM 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 45.38 HAND SANITIZER 306704 83261 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 241.57 367667 112412013 125225 BOMA GREATER MINNEAPOLIS 85.00 JOB POSTING 306434 16372 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 85.00 306539 111604 367671 112412013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 1,960.13 COMPRESSOR, GOVERNOR 00005942 306338 704775 Council Check Register 195.97 FILTER ASSEMBLIES 00005945 306339 1/24/2013 — 1/2412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367686 112412013 19.50 131494 BONNER S LEACH LLP 00005855 306707 703267X1 18,323.75 DEC BILLING 306411 DEC2012 1195.6103 18,323.75 367672 112412013 367669 112412013 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 132.00 AIR SAMPLE TESTING 4,436.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003549 306705 80966901 1470.6510 33.00 4,436.00 306709 367670 112412013 4,178.65 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 306710 306539 111604 367671 112412013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 1,960.13 COMPRESSOR, GOVERNOR 00005942 306338 704775 195.97 FILTER ASSEMBLIES 00005945 306339 705331 491.92 MUFFLER STRAPS, CLAMPS 00005855 306706 703765 19.50 ELBOW 00005855 306707 703267X1 2,667.52 367672 112412013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 132.00 AIR SAMPLE TESTING 306708 1300080 33.00 AIR SAMPLE TESTING 306709 1300134 4,178.65 HAZARDOUS BLDG MATERIALS INSP 306710 364732 4,343.65 367673 112412013 100391 CALL ONE INC. 280.64 PHONE HEADSET 00003133 306435 369516 280.64 367674 112412013 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 8.82 SHIPPING CHARGE 306498 924008895 67.62 GOLF BALLS 306499 924008889 10.90 SHIPPING CHARGE 306500 924028599 608.58 GOLF BALLS 306501 924028555 695.92 367675 112412013 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 7,513.80 LEGAL COUNSEL 306777 2851G -12/12 7,513.80 367676 112412013 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 5842.5513 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 7412.6103 7412.6103 01246.1705.20 1400.6406 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 1195.6131 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page- 5 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN GENERALSUPPLIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF RANGE PSTF RANGE OLD PW BLDG DEMOLITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONALSERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 35.75 ART WORK SOLD 306468 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 367682 1124/2013 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 68.09 88.97 233.14 235.49 281.34 294.89 674.41 832.12 885.10 913.49 972.52 1,219.20 306540 95086 1495.6103 1495.6103 1495.6103 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5514 5101.4413 1470.4329 5862.5513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page- 6 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 35.75 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 367677 112412013 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 306415 010413 5861.6186 HEAT 21.33 OCE SCANNER EXPRESS 306412 987873138 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 120.00 OCE SCANNER EXPRESS 306413 987882532 YORK OCCUPANCY 306415 7.22 BILLABLE USAGE 11/15 - 11/30/12 306414 987892750 306415 010413 148.55 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 306415 367678 112412013 HEAT 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 306415 010413 5420.6186 HEAT 2,176.55 306415 306502 207733 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 522.20 010413 306541 225314 ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 306415 2,587.40 5761.6186 306542 224365 52.50 306543 224364 915.55 306544 224367 6,254.20 367679 112412013 130252 CARTER, JOEL 48.59 ART WORK SOLD 306469 011413 48.59 367680 1124/2013 131507 CASSERLY, ROBERT 27.64 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 306627 011713 27.64 367681 112412013, 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 367682 1124/2013 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 68.09 88.97 233.14 235.49 281.34 294.89 674.41 832.12 885.10 913.49 972.52 1,219.20 306540 95086 1495.6103 1495.6103 1495.6103 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5514 5101.4413 1470.4329 5862.5513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page- 6 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ART WORK SOLD AMBULANCE FEES ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306415 010413 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 306415 010413 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 306415 010413 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 306415 010413 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 306415 010413 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 306415 010413 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 306415 010413 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 306415 010413 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 306415 010413 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 306415 010413 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 306415 010413 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 306415 010413 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,246.63 306415 010413 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 2,140.85 306415 010413 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,473.68 306415 010413 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 6,619.58 306415 010413 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 19,179.50 367683 112412013 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 111.84 PERMIT REFUND - 6925 CORNELIA 306711 ED119290 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS. INSPECTIONS 111.84 367684 112412013 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 6,532.37 306778 2536812 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 45.96 306779 2537282 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 6,578.33 367685 1124/2013 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 1,831.84 ENVELOPES 306436 70783 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,831.84 367686 112412013 123898 CENTURYLINK 58.27 952 9441841 306340 1841 -1/13 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 155.32 952 285 -2951 306341 2951 -1/13 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 59.32 952 944 -6522 306437 6522 -1/13 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 272.91 367687 112412013 105861 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES 300.00 DOWN PAYMENT - DEPOSIT 306436 0 #502131 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 300.00 367688 1124/2013 120613 CHATTERTON, LINDA 38.97 ART WORK SOLD 306470 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 38.97 367689 112412013 100683 CHEMSEARCH 717.79 CONTRACT WATER TREATMENT PROG 306522 965807 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 717.79 367690 112412013 101264 CHET'S SAFEY SALES INC. 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS 306342 26417 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 703.00 SAFETY BOOTS 00005906 306713 S10351 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 1,008.98 SAFETY BOOTS 00005906 306713 S10351 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,276.71 SAFETY BOOTS 00005906 306713. S10351 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 184.60 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register. 367693 112412013 1/2412013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,138.69 6.77 8772 10 614 0373022 367691 112412013 373022 -12/12 102519 CHIEF'S TOWING INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 362.07 TOWING SERVICES 00005791 306712 587717 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 306781 362.07 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 367692 1124/2013 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 8772 10 614 0023973 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 8 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 184.60 306545 0198433710 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES ENGINEERING GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES 2,692.45 306546 684726 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 184.60 367693 112412013 120433 COMCAST 6.77 8772 10 614 0373022 306780 373022 -12/12 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4.52 8772 10 614 0023973 306781 23973 -12/12 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4.53 8772 10 614 0023973 306803 23973 -1/13 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15.82 367694 1/2412013 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 856.82 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 306416 123112 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 856.84 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 306416 123112 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 856.84 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 306416 123112 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,570.50 367695 112412013 121655 CUBA, SARA 23.40 ART WORK SOLD 306471 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 23.40 367696 112412013 105762 CYNOR, JAMIE T. 51.98 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306439 011613 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 51.98 367697 112412013 104020 DALCO 424.99 TISSUE, TOWELS 00001454 306714 2556461 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 235.34 TOWELS, TISSUE 00001454 306715 2556436 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1,517.89 CAN LINERS 00005902 306716 2556497 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,178.22 367698 1124/2013 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 182.00 ART WORK SOLD 306472 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 182.00 367699 112412013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES ENGINEERING GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES 2,692.45 306546 684726 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 1/24/2013 - 1124/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 717.65 306547 684727 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 960.25 306548 684728 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,370.35 367700 112412013 131497 DEFOE, JIM 38.00 CLASS REFUND 306523 011613 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 38.00 367701 1124/2013 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 43.85 DEC MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306417 011513 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 43.85 367702 112412013 124356 DILL, SARAH 65.00 ART WORK SOLD 306473 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 367703 112412013 118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC. 328.72 ALUMINUM TUBING 00001548 306612 01852386 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 328.72 367704 112412013 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 22.75 ARTWORK SOLD 306474 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 367705 112412013 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 1,195.00 LEGAL SERVICES 306606 1846879 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 10,819.68 LEGAL SERVICES 306607 1846878 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 12,014.68 367706 112412013 131500 DUDLEY, VIRGINIA 102.00 CLASS REFUND 306524 011413 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 102.00 367707 112412013 123253 DYNAMIC PUBLISHING LLC 2,210.00 2013 TOWN PLANNER AD 306343 123253 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 2,210.00 2013 TOWN PLANNER AD 306343 123253 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,210.00 2013 TOWN PLANNER AD 306343 123253 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 6,630.00 367708 1/2412013 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 23.28 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SIGNS 00001576 306525 _ 09601100 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 128.13 WIRING FOR FIBER OPTICS 00001588 306717 09616600 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 162.75 CITY OF EDINA 367715 112412013 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES Council Check Register 112412013 783.30 125152 EISERT, TOM 00 -10576 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 CONSULTING DESIGN Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 306418 21.29 PLASTIC BOX, HOLE SEAL 00001597 306718 09623800 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 472.50 172.70 " 306418 011513 367709 112412013 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 5822.5515 129.80 506.00 128.73 DEC WASHES 306503 5335 1553.6238 CAR WASH 367712 128.73 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 367710 112412013 FAN MODULE 00006189 306613 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 5422.6530 930.31 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 1 D Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.60 BRAEMAR GOLF 306440 #16 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 176.40 BRAEMAR GOLF 306440 #16 5420.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CLUB HOUSE 110.25- CREDIT 306719 RETURN 5420.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CLUB HOUSE INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 1,250.00 BLDG DEPT ANALYSIS 306608 1127 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1,250.00 162.75 367715 112412013 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 367711 112412013 783.30 125152 EISERT, TOM 00 -10576 10044.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 783.30 33.00 LICENSE FEES 306418 011513 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 472.50 96.80 LICENSE FEES 306418 011513 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 125 -2510 5822.5515 129.80 506.00 367712 112412013 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 26.75 FAN MODULE 00006189 306613 74- 047750 5422.6530 930.31 T90 REPAIRS 306782 65548 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,292.39 T -90 REPAIRS 306783 65192 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,222.70 367713 1124/2013 130998 EMERSON, ANGELA 82.55 ART WORK SOLD 306475 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 82.55 367714 112412013 130846 ETHICAL LEADERS IN ACTION LLC INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 1,250.00 BLDG DEPT ANALYSIS 306608 1127 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1,250.00 367715 112412013 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 783.30 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 306720 00 -10576 10044.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 783.30 367716 112412013 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 472.50 306549 W- 689968 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 33.50 306647 125 -2510 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 506.00 367717 112412013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 26.75 FAN MODULE 00006189 306613 74- 047750 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1123/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 11 1/24/2013 — 112412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.10 LINKS 306721 69- 088293 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 326.00 MODULE (B) 306722 69- 088516 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 402.85 367718 1/2412013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,856.30 METERS 00001559 306372 0008442 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR . 1,233.99 METER HORNS 00001559 306373 0008357 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 3,090.29 367719 112412013 116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 10,534.83 RANGE FILTERS 306723 51265 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 10,534.83 367720 112412013 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 344.78 BOOTS 00003542 306724 7795 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 344.78 367721 112412013 106115 FISHMAN, SANDRA 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 306476 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 367722 1124/2013 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 144.00 306550 5679 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 144.00 367723 1/2412013 126725 FORTNER, NOLA 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 306477 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 367724 112412013 120113 FRANCIS, JOYCE 19.08 ART WORK SOLD 306478 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.08 367725 112412013 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 259.00 HOODED SWEATSHIRTS 306344 84577 1622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING & HOCKEY 259.00 367726 1/24/2013 131495 GENSMER, BETH 57.85 ART WORK SOLD 306479 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 57.85 367727 112412013 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/24/2013 - 112412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 56.55 ART WORK SOLD 306480 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD TELEPHONE ART WORK SOLD LAUNDRY ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 56.55 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 367728 112412013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 46.54 R -91 PHONE 306784 4408533 1470.6188 46.54 367729 112412013 117811 GOLBERG, CAROLYN 85.80 ART WORK SOLD 306481 011513 5101.4413 85.80 367730 1124/2013 129585 GOSSARD, TRAVIS 238.88 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 306345 011113 1301.6201 238.88 367731 1124/2013 111092 GOTZSCHE, OTTO 113.75 ART WORK SOLD 306482 011413 5101.4413 113.75 367732 112412013 101103 GR "NGER 136.24 TOOLS 00001548 306374 9034934233 5913.6406 79.26 BATTERIES 00001548 306375 9034934241 5913.6406 158.06 METAL HALIDES, LIGHTING 00002276 306632 9036278803 5720.6406 19.78 00005975 306725 9036021211 1553.6556 45.47 00005975 306725 9036021211 5913.6406 198.69 SURGE OUTLETS 00001586 306726 9034358227 1552.6406 379.14 SURGE PROTECTORS, OUTLETS 00001586 306727 9034358219 1552.6406 58.74 CARD FILE, BATTERIES 00005904 306728 9038885415 1553.6406 1,075.38 367733 112412013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 356.50 298831 144456 5842.5513 142.25 298832 144462 5822.5513 264.50 306551 148261 5862.5513 1,093.50 306552 148223 5842.5513 444.50 306553 148224 5822.5513 2,301.25 367734 1124/2013 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 371.35 SURGE PROTECTORS 00001510 306346 964302487 1552.6406 371.35 TELEPHONE ART WORK SOLD LAUNDRY ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 13 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS 4,009.00 CHEMICALS 00005243 306376 3424594 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,009.00 367745 1124/2013 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/2412013 — 1124/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 367735 112412013 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 33.80 ART WORK SOLD 306483 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 33.80 367736 112412013 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 4,622.00 GOLF LESSONS 306441 011613 5401.4602 LESSONS 4,622.00 367737 1124/2013 124620 GRIFFIN, SANDRA 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 306484 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 19.50 367738 112412013 100918 GRIMSBY, NANCY 145.60 ART WORK SOLD 306485 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 145.60 367739 112412013 104469 GS DIRECT INC. 50.85 PLOT PAPER 306526 294098 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.85 367740 112412013 102680 GUEST SERVICES INC 334.64 NFA TRAINING 00003540 306729 193842 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 334.64 367741 112412013 100788 H&L MESABI 928.53 PLOW BLADES 00005786 306347 86696 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 928.53 367742 112412013 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 5,577.19• FEB PREMIUM 306614 6180101 -5 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 6.65 COBRA 306615 011813 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 5,583.84 367743 112412013 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 270.00 LIABILITY INSURANCE 306419 SOFTBALL 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 270.00 367744 112412013 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 13 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS 4,009.00 CHEMICALS 00005243 306376 3424594 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,009.00 367745 1124/2013 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 14 1/24/2013 — 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 11,675.08 FEB PREMIUM 306616 42396403 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,278.57 306617 42385566 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 12,953.65 367746 1124/2013 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 569.03 REMODEL- DISPATCH BREAKROOM 306785 509555 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 427.34 ROLLER SHADE 306786 509553 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,481.59 CHAIRS 306787 509554 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,477.96 367747 112412013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 455.50 306554 631705 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS.SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 56.00 306555 631706 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 311.00 306556 631901 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 727.00 306557 631708 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,549.50 367748 112412013 102044 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 7,497.53 COUNTRYSIDE PARK PLAN 306788 012 -042 -5 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH 7,497.53 367749 112412013 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 844.30 BIRTHDAY PARTY BROCHURES 306457 32080 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,023.65 PARTY INVITATION POSTCARDS 306458 32078 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,108.12 EDINBOROUGH PK BROCHURES 306459 32079 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGHADMINISTRATION 2,976.07 367750 112412013 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 1,997.24 ID CARD PRINTER REPLACEMENT 306504 153134 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,997.24 367761 112412013 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 563.67 MAIL LATE NOTICES 306348 72804 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 563.67 367752 112412013 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIAT 240.00 OFFICIATING FEES 306349 403 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 240.00 367753 112412013 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 27.24 INTERNET 306730 10511736 7410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 27.24 CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367754 112412013 131513 J.A. SEXAUER 1,282.22 DOOR OPENER PARTS 306731 280151259 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,282.22 367755 112412013 125031 J.S. PALUCH COMPANY INC. 33.70 ACCT 1225394 ADVERSTISING 306505 BRAEMAR GOLF 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 33.70 367756 112412013 104198 JACK MCCLARD & ASSOCIATES INC. 90.04 TIRE CHANGER CLAMP 306732 50738 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.04 367757 112412013 100828 JERRY S FOODS 3.85 306506 123112 1622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING & HOCKEY 63.68 306506 123112 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 91,21 306506 123112 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 158.74 367758 1124/2013 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 1.30 306420 122112 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 3.34 306420 122112 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 9.80 306420 122112 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 13.50 306420 122112 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 14.35 306420 122112 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 22.22 306420 122112 1622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING & HOCKEY . 41.01 306420 122112 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 43.00 306420 122112 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 58.58 306420 .122112 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 60.23 306420 122112 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 85.08 306420 122112 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 111.94 306420 122112 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 142.38 306420 122112 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINSOROUGH OPERATIONS 202.51 306420 122112 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 203.60 306420 122112 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 369.48 306420 122112 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,242.72 306420 122112 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,625.04 367769 112412013 102136 JERRY S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 101.02 COVERS 00005940 306350 0020480 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.02 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 16 1/24/2013 -1/2412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367760 112412013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 60.30 306648 1999980 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,044.45 306649 1999979 5842:5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,183.70 306650 1999969 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,184.30 306651 1999967 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 30.53- 306652 1999968 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 12.00- 306653 1999978 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,430.22 367762 112412013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,638.30 306558 1482079 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,414.87 306559 1482081 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,640.42 306560 1482078 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 248.28 306561 1480094 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11.03- 306562 561651 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 29.69- 306563 561652 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.91- 306564 561653 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 748.95 306654 1482060 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 194.89 306655 1482065 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,661.81 306656 1482066 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 288.94 306657 1482063 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,318.86 306658 1482061 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,090.96 306659 1482064 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,861.54 306660 1482077 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 56 306661 1482059 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 278.48 306662 1482067 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,134.09 306663 1482080 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 281.61 306664 1482062 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,844.83 306665 1482071 , 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,691.75 306666 1482073 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,607.67 306667 1482075 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 787.33 306668 1482070 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .28 306669 1482058 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,165.51 306670 1482072 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,598.14 306671 1482074 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,626.71 306672 1482076 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.00- 306673 562767 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.81- 306674 562231 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 38,050.34 367763 112412013 123696 JOHNSTON, TOR[ R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1123/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 17 1/2412013 — 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 75.40 ART WORK SOLD 306486 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 75.40 367764 112412013 102603 JONAS, LENORE 31.85 ART WORK SOLD 306487 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.85 367765 112412013 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 152.95 2013 UNIFORM PURCAHSE 306733 011413 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 152.95 367766 112412013 - 131439 KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL LLP 552.50 FLIGHT TRACK CHANGES 306421 13374 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 552.50 367767 1124/2013 111018 KEEPRS INC. 312.18 UNIFORMS 00003530 306734 203448 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 225.96 00003537 306735 205495 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 538.14 367768 112412013 124730 KEITH, BARBARA 23.39 ART WORK SOLD 306489 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 23.39 367769 1/24/2013 129405 KEY ELECTRIC LLC 1,395.00 WORK ON GROTTO PROJECT 306460 010913 -05 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 1,395.00 367770 112412013 118996 KHARIWALA, SARAH 68.25 ART WORK SOLD 306488 011413 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 68.25 367771 1124/2013 131504 KOSMIDES, GEORGE 4,019.16. UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 306624 SEWER CHARGES 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 4,019.16 367772 1124/2013 130215 KUEHL, RHONDA 104.00 ART WORK SOLD 306490 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 104.00 367773 1124/2013 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 307.48 DWI TOWS (2) 306442 011513 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE :+ R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 307.48 367774 112412013 131511 L.E. RIBAR COMPANY INC. 158.98 IGNITION CONTROL 00001579 306736 37989 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 158.98 367775 1/24/2013 131501 LANDY, LAURA BETH 184.00 CLASS REFUND 306527 011613 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 184.00 367776 112412013 121656 LAVEN, JANE 215.80 ART WORK SOLD 306491 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD i 215.80 367777 112412013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 380.90 BITS, SCREWS, FITTINGS 00005899 306737 9301350415 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 970.22 HOSE 00005857 306738 9301346632 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 52.29 NIPPLE 00005899 306739 9301360355 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 26.14 NIPPLE 00005899 306740 9301363620 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 554.44 SCREWS, COUPLERS 00005904 306741 9301363618 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,983.99 t 367778 112412013 131512 LEWIS, KURT 99.61 PERMIT REFUND - 421 JEFFERSON 306742 ED119356 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS 99.61 367779 1/2412013 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 18 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS 99.00 306565 23320 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 99.00 367780 1/2412013 100556 LIND ELECTRONICS INC. 117.51. POWER ADAPTER 00004303 306443 277567 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 117.51 367781 1/24/2013 101314 LITTLE BLIND SPOT, THE 1,195.04 SHADES FOR DISPATCH 306789 62988 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 1,195.04 367782 1/2412013 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 151.51 COPIER USAGE 306743 1510962 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.51 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 19 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367783 112412013 100858 LOGIS 125.00 306422 36053 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 155.00 306422 36053 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,210.00 306422 36053 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,569.00 306422 36053 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,085.00 306422 36053 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 3,172.00 306422 36053 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,174.00 306422 36053 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,323.00 306422 36053 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,994.00 306422 36053 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 26,807.00 367784 1124/2013 131496 LOSO, GENEVIEVE 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 306492 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 367785 112412013 131498 LOXTERCAMP, QUENTIN 87.00 CLASS REFUND 306528 011413 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 87.00 367786 112412013 101792 LUBE -TECH 2,714.97 SYNTHETIC ATF 306744 2156173 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7,720.68 OIL, ATF, LUBE 306745 2156171 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,306.18 OIL 306746 2156134 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11,741.83 367787 1124/2013 122188 MACMAGIC 240.00 HOSTING / DOMAIN 306747 4973 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 240.00 367788 112412013 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 1,829.09 BELT, ROLLERS, PIVOT PINS 00005937 306351 2130790 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,019.34 DIRT SHOE ASSEMBLIES, TOW BAR60005938 306352 2130788 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.11 NOZZLES, SCRAPER 00005936 306353 2130789 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 315.89 MIRRORS, BRACKET 00005891 306748 2130760 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,252.43 367789 112412013 129830 MAPMO 100.00 2013 MAPMO DUES 306444 2013 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 100.00 36779:, 1124/2013 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 320.00 HOSTING FEES 306445 178 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5800.1740 5500.1705 421460.6710 1495.6105 5101.4413 1,900.00 REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL 306609 12- 1214EDWO 9232.6103 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT CONSTR. IN PROGRESS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page- 20 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,900.00 320.00 367791 112412013 367795 112412013 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 7,978.75 PHONES /EQUIPMENT 306355 0071103 -IN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306354. 650.67 PHONES FOR COACHES ROOMS 306507 68807 37.29 2,270.22 PHONES FOR EOC 306507 68807 10,899.64 101483 MENARDS 367792 112412013 101267 MBPTA 113.12 OUTDOOR FIREPIT 00001592 306356 100.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 306446 2013 12.02 100.00 00001589 306357 15136 1646.6406 367793 112412013 129068 MCCLELLAN, EILEEN LUMBER, SCREWS, WASHERS 00008025 306529 14757 5511.6406 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 306493 011513 PAINT SUPPLIES 00006307 306618 22.75 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 367794 112412013 RATCHETS 131503 MCION23E METRO APRAISAL 15506 1322.6406 5800.1740 5500.1705 421460.6710 1495.6105 5101.4413 1,900.00 REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL 306609 12- 1214EDWO 9232.6103 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT CONSTR. IN PROGRESS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page- 20 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,900.00 367795 112412013 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 37.29 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306354. 011413 1240.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 37.29 367796 112412013 101483 MENARDS 113.12 OUTDOOR FIREPIT 00001592 306356 15132 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 12.02 CORNER POST KIT 00001589 306357 15136 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.76 LUMBER, SCREWS, WASHERS 00008025 306529 14757 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 55.87 PAINT SUPPLIES 00006307 306618 15082 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 53.79 RATCHETS 00001605 306749 15506 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 6.03 FILTERS 00001604 306750 15322 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 82.03 HARDWARE FOR GOALS 00001596 306751 15203 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 245.01 OUTDOOR FIREPITS, GYPSUM 00001601 306752 15304 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 615.63 367797 112412013 104366 MENDEL, NATHAN 1,695.73 UNIFORM PURCHASE 306447 011613 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,695.73 367798 112412013 102928 METRO CITIES 12,381.00 2013 DUES 306448 23 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 1:44:32 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 12,381.00 367799 112412013 100885 METRO SALES INC 3,030.72 - COPIER USAGE 306790 491833 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 3,030.72 367800 1124/2013 100895 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPOR 85.39 DRILL BITS 00001552 306358 14466586 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 85.39 367801 1/24/2013 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.34 WINDOW WASHING 306359 928006329 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.38 306360 928006021 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 16.09 306361 928006022 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 42.81 367802 1/24/2013 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 90.00 LICENSE - JAMIE LA MANNA 306753 011613 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 367803 1/2412013 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 51.30 STEEL 00005863 306362 0097091 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.30 367804 112412013 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 52.19 AUTHOR'S STUDIO POSTERS 306363 12671 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 68.16 WALK WITH MAYOR/MANAGER POSTER 306363 12671 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 193.69 METER BILL STUFFERS 306423 12433 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 52.19 AUTHOR'S STUDIO POSTERS 306508 12369 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 471.11 MAIL STUFFERS 306509 12539 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 837.34 367805 112412013 117420 MOE; MARK 113.75 ART WORK SOLD 306494 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 113.75 367806 1/2412013 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 151.26 BUSINESS CARDS 00003554 306754 5943 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 151.26 367807 112412013 100906 MTi DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,311.11 ROLLER KITS, BEARINGS 00006309 306619 885103 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 350.56 GREASE SEALS 1,661.67 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00006311 306620 885377 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 367808 112412013 114343 MULLEN, JANET 89.70 ART. WORK SOLD 306495 011513 5101.4413 89.70 367809 112412013 101380 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 1,004.78 BOOTS 00003525 306755 00375553 SNV 421470.6710 339.30 BOOTS 00003525 306756 00375956 SNV 421470.6710 1,344.08 367810 112412013 102592 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSI 10,500.00 2013 ANNUAL DUES 306449 2013 1120.6105 10,500.00 367811 112412013 101472 NEHA 95.00 MEMBERSHIP - SOLVEI WILMOT 306450 63738 -2013 1490.6104 95.00 367812 112412013 129304 NELSON, DAVID 51.35 ART WORK SOLD 306496 011513 5101.4413 51.35 367813 1124/2013 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 591.50 306566 78797 5862.5513 372.50 306567 78790 5842.5513 964.00 367814 112412013 131499 NOLTNER, KAREN 12.00 CLASS REFUND 306530 011413 5101.4607 12.00 367815 112412013 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 296.95 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003552 306757 900258615 1470.6510 296.95 367816 112412013 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 473.14 STROBES, REFLECTORS 00005875 306758 32133 1553.6530 277.36 STROBES, REFLECTORS 00005875 306759 32387 1553.6530 750.50 ART WORK SOLD EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT. REPLACEMENT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CLASS REGISTRATION FIRSTAID SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 22 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC HEALTH ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 1124/2013 -1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367817 1124/2013 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 45.11 MOUSEPADS, DESKPADS, REFILLS 306461 639699342001 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 59.00 DAYTIMER REFILLS 306462 639699517001 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 104.11 367818 112412013 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 23.94 306510 W12120650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENAt! :- -7 23.94 306510 W12120650 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 23.94 306510 W12120650 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 47.88 306510 W12120650 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 47.88 306510 W12120650 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 47.88 306510 W12120650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.82 306510 W12120650 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 71.82 306510 W12120650 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 71.82 306510 W12120650 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 92.52 306510 W12120650 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 95.78 306510 W12120650 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 115.76 306510 W12120650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.70 306510 W12120650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 167.58 306510 W12120650 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 167.58 306510 W12120650 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 239.40 306510 W12120650 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 372.90 306511 W12120656 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1,802.14 367819 112412013 131287 OLIVER CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 3,870.00 ROOF CONSTRUCTION 306804 4010 5750.1720 BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET 3,870.00 367820 112412013 101659 ORIUN PEST CONTROL 134.16 PEST CONTROL 306791 80174727 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 134.16 367821 112412013 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 720.75 SERVICE CONTRACT 306792 47243 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 720.75 367822 112412013 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 23,505.63 FINAL PAYMENT 306793 012513 01385.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD 23,505.63 367823 112412013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 24 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 33.25 306568 8384216 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,580.50 306569 8384212 -IN 5862.5513E COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,508.55 306570 8384205 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,433.69 306571 8384208 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,555.99 367824 112412013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 214.96 306531 07972731 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 214.96 367625 112412013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 375.20 306572 2365188 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.12 306573 2365177 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,755.67 306574 2365186 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.12- 306575 3497242 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 943.98 306675 2365184 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 278.72 306676 2365176 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,208.97 306677 2365182 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 178.24 306678 2365183 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 733.08 306679 2365185 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 920.44 306680 2365187 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 780.33 306681 2365178 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 192.48 306682 2365180 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 285.83 306683 2365179 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 12.00- 306684 3497759 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.94- 306685 3497760 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,639.00 367826 112412013 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,206.17 TIRES 00005778 306760 210042650 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,206.17 367827 1/24/2013 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 150.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00001594 306761 263152 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 150.00 367828 1124/2013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 537.55 TISSUE, LINERS, CLEANERS 00008029 306532 5883 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 537.55 367829 112412013 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 787.95 BEDKNIFE 00006351 306621 CD1636403 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 25 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CITY HALL GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check i. Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 787.95 367830 112412013 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 406.00 LIGHTING REPAIRS 00002384 306634 97109 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 406.00 367831 112412013 102986 RECYCOOL 172.50 ANTIFREEZE 00005792 306762 3301164 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 172.50 36783' 112412013 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 300.00 DASHERBOARD AD SALES 306451 1212151 -8 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 95.00 POSTER DESIGN 306512 1212151 -6 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 395.00 367833 112412013 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 669,891.02 HORNETS NEST CONSTRUCTION 306794 1207021805 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 669,891.02 367834 112412013 131502 ROBICHAUD, ALLISON 204.00 CLASS REFUND 306533 011613 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 204.00 367835 1124/2013 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 303.00 DUES - J. BENNEROTTE 306364 1642 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 303.00 DUES - SCOTT NEAL 306805 1605 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 606.00 367836 112412013 117807 SAM'S CLUB 156.01 SUPPLIES /REFRESHMENTS 306795 010713 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 156.01 367837 112412013 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 21.25 STRAPS 00002383 306635 41082986 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.07 CONNECTORS 00002383 306636 41082987 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.32 367838 1124/2013 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 560.19 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 306806 8103368177 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 560.19 367839 112412013 105514 SCHIRO, DOUG 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 25 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 26 1/24/2013 - 1124/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 87.00 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 306763 011513 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 87.00 367840 112412013 127049 SCHNEIDER, KATHERINE 320.00 FITNESS TRAINING 306610 011413 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 320.00 367841 1124/2013 104689 SERIGRAPHICS'SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 373.96 SIGNAGE 306796 43307 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 373.96 367842 112412013 100997 SESAC INC. 652.00 2013 MUSIC LICENSE 00002385 306633 3595574 5760.6105 DUES B, SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 652.00 367843 112412013 120784 SIGN PRO 1,152.85 HORNETS NEST SIGNS 306513 6277 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 365.88 SIGNS 306534 6325 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,518.73 367845 112412013 101000 SIR SPEEDY 177.95 BUSINESS CARDS 306535 75285 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 177.95 367846 112412013 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 5,081.00 QTR1 2013 DUES 00008859 306368 8859 1470.6221 RANGE RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,687.00 QTRII 2013 DUES 00008859 306368 8859 1400.6221 RANGE RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11,768.00 367847 1124/2013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,839.73 306576 2004836 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,765.45 306577 2009008 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 151.84 306578 2004884 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,584.92 306579 2009009 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,161.77 306580 2019073 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 608.00 306581 1995052 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,071.29 306582 2019074 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 40.62 306583 2019075 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 389.90 306584 2004885 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 681.50 306585 2004883 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,270.33 306686 2019078 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 15,565.35 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 367848 112412013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 20.99 DUCT TIE 00001610 306622 S2668963.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1400.6203 20.99 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1400.6203 367849 112412013 1400.6203 101015 STREICHERS 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5842.6122 1,250.33 VEST, SHIRT CARRIER 306514 1976991 12.81- CREDIT 306515 CM259513 16.02 BELT LOOP ATTACHMENT 306516 1988901 80.00 CONCEALABLE CARRIER 306517 1989216 1,333.54 367850 112412013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 307.33 EDINALIQUORAD 306797 1416398 307.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 306797 1416398 307.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 306797 1416398 922.00 367851 112412013 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 42.72 380007460384 LISTING 306369 010413 42.74 380007460384 LISTING 306369 010413 42.74 380007460384 LISTING 306369 010413 128.20 367852 1124/2013 120998 . SURLY BREWING CO. 1,425.00 306586 009223 1,336.00 306587 009375 2,761.00 367853 1124/2013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 35.30 306687 732443 2,840.18 306688 732442 2,875.48 367854 1124/2013 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 1,092.00 MAGAZINEAD 306452 2013 -93713 1,092.00 367855 112412013 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 109.00 1/8/13 COUNCIL MINUTES 306463 M19548 109.00 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 5842.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5410.6122 1120.6103 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page - 27 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Council Check Register Page - 28 1/24/2013 — 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367856 1124/2013 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 77.62 TICKET 143493 PC 306425 BAL DUE 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 77.62 367857 112412013 131505 TORP, KAREN 110.12 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 306625 6508 NORDIC DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 110.12 367858 1124/2013 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 213.68 COPIER USAGE 306764 219823135 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 213.68 367859 112412013 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 105.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 306623 102006645 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 105.00 367860 112412013 103973:.ULINE 1,169.26 AREA RUGS, MATS 306765 46558825 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,169.26 367861 112412013 131065. UMR GEOTHERMAL 510.00 REPAIR GEOTHERM MANIFOLD 306798 6108 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 510.00 367862 112412013 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 219.54 UNIFORMS 306426 123112 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 219.54 367863 112412013 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1,100.00 EMT COURSE 306766 1.7.2013 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,100.00 367864 1/2412013 131382 US FOODS CULINARY EQUIPMENT & 1,271.82 RAILING TABLES 306536 8485409 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,271.82 367865 112412013 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 643.79 HIP BOOTS 00001547 306377 853230 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 643.79 367866 112412013 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 182.80 PAGERS 306370 W0319246A 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 1123/2013 7:44:32 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 182.80 367867 112412013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 501.70 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 306371 260169 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 176.47 GUN CLEANING RAGS 306767 260792 -00 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 678.17 367868 1124/2013 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 211.62 CONTROLLER 00002380 306637 10913001 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 211.62 367869 112412013 119454 VINOCOPIA 301.00 306689 0070851 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 301.00 367870 112412013 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,225.00 1ST QTR SERVICES 306453 212036 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 2,225.00 367871 112412013 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 600.00 2012 TECHNOLOGY STIPEND 306518 011513 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 600.00 367872 1124/2013 105440 WEIGLE, SUE 192.39 PETTY CASH 306454 010913 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 192.39 367873 112412013 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 758.09 DEC SERVICE 306424 826373318 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 758.09 367874 112412013 116768 WET PAINT INC. 12.70 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009228 306455 705220 -01 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 12.70 367875 112412013 130487 WHEELOCK, PATRICIA 115.00 CLASS REFUND 306537 011613 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 115.00 367876 1/2412013 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI 3.89 OCT 2012 MILEAGE 306799 122112 5952.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING 266.96 OCT 2012 MILEAGE 306799 122112 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 18.87 NOV 2012 MILEAGE 38.30 NOV 2012 MILEAGE 328.02 5842.5513 367877 112412013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 334.30 320285 -00 1,197.20 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,279.80 306591 2,811.30 5862.5513 367878 112412013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 259.91 440369 4,754.40 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 330.73 306690 3,420.26 5842.5513 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/2412013 - 1/2412013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 306800 010213 5952.6107 306800 010213 1490.6107 Subledger Account Description MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1/2312013 7:44:32 Page - 30 Business Unit RECYCLING PUBLIC HEALTH 306588 320291 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306589 320296 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 306590 320285 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 306591 440365 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306592 440369 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306690 440364 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 306691 440368 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 306692 440366 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 367879 112412013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 31.02 306593 164208 7,947.81 306594 164213 33.07 306595 164214 2,884.42 306596 164215 2,958.36 306597 164209 45.15 306598 164210 3,184.81 306599 164207 1,810.31 306693 164212 1,415.33 306694 164211 20,310.28 367880 112412013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,420.40 306600 108951 246.00 306601 108952 120.00 306602 108142 129.00 306603 108141 3,170.58 306604 108140 4,007.30 306695 110893 296.00 306696 110892 10,389.28 367881 112412013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 5862.5515 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5842.5514 5842.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 2,791.50 51- 6227619 -3 306427 353660394 5761.6185 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER LIGHT 8 POWER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 814.41 514197645 -8 1,195.12 51- 5619094 -8 4,183.13 51- 5619094 -8 8,984.16 1,218,555.04 Grand Total PO # Doc No 306428 306429 306429 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/24/2013 — 1/24/2013 Inv No Account No 353257629 1322.6185 353470034 1552.6185 353470034 5915.6185 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,218,555.04 Total Payments 1,218,555.04 1/23/2013 7:44:32 Page- 31 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING WATER TREATMENT R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 186,916.06 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 307.48 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 39,284.33 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,959.08 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,452.21 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 92.52 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 71.20 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 10,911.87 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 682,145.71 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 16,073.89 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 11,589.98 05800 LIQUOR FUND 164,980.15 05900 UTILITY FUND 29,580.29 05950 RECYCLING FUND 34,215.56 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 14,482.84 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 13,914.68 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,577.19 Report Totals 1,218,555.04 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 1/24/2013 - 1/24/2013 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements. of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures d 1123/2013 7:46:17 Page- 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CITY OF EDINA EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS Council Check Register 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367882 113112013 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 726.18 UB TEMP 306830 37137461 5910.6103 726.18 367883 113112013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 99.60 306872 1646175 5862.5515 46.00 307087 1648890 5842.5515 145.60 367884 113112013 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 194.48 KITCHEN HOOD INSPECTION 306931 118904 5421.6102 194.48 367885 113112013 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 86.88 BRAKE CHAMBER 00005988 306932 AFS- 230220069 1553.6530 86.88 367886 1/3112013 101681 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 565.00 MEMBERSHIP - CARY TEAGUE 306933 085192 -12114 1140.6105 565.00 367887 113112013 116465 ANDERSON, TOM 41.21 EMPLOYEE MEETING EXPENSE 307228 122912 5840.6106 41.22 EMPLOYEE MEETING EXPENSE 307228 122912 5820.6106 82.43 367888 1/3112013 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 637.52 'FOOD 307125 1870095 5730.5510 482.70 FOOD 307126 1866518 5730.5510 713.17 FOOD 307127 1867843 5730.5510 23.75- CREDIT 307128 1863973 5730.5510 1.809.64 367889 113112013 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 305.24 COFFEE 306831 1052724 1550.6406 305.24 367890 113112013 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 427.50 ANNUAL TEST & INSPECTION 306832 167937 1646.6103 213.75 306833 167938 1646.6103 641.25 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 1 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PLANNING MEETING EXPENSE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL MEETING EXPENSE 50TH STREET GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Council Check Register Page - 2 1131/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367891 1131/2013 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 166.59 BATTERY 00005981 306934 10111162 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 166.59 367892 113112013 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 25.93 IPAD DATA SERVICE 306978 287240706569X01 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 1713 25.93 367893 113112013 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 64.90 BUSINESS CARDS 306834 495 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 64.90 367894 113112013 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3,774.00 FILMTECH SEWER ANALYSIS 306807 23271180.00 -7 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,774.00 367895 113112013 117363 13ASSFORD REMELE 140.00 LITIGATION 307229 156440 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 140.00 367896 1/3112013 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 144.67 BATTERIES 306979 018 - 292535 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 735.30 BATTERIES 00003560 307129 016- 292513 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 679.97 367897 113112013 100646' BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 2,385.51 ICE SKATES 00002391 307053 00092620 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,077.30 POLYCARBONATE SHEETS FOR ADS 307130 00092565 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,462.81 367898 113112013 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 49.02 306873 87888700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 73.55 307002 76685900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 432.65 307003 76762200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 534.95 307004 76686000 5862.5512 -COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 34.67- 307005 76707100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 153.50 307088 87909900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 108.70 307089 6283400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 82.00 307218 76738300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 140.42 307219 87909700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 645.55 307220 76738200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 40.80- 2,144.87 367899 ::3112013 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 448.20 PIZZA 448.20 367900 1131/2013 126139 BERNICK'S 31.10 31.10 367901 113112013 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 241.50 COFFEE 154.50 COFFEE 396.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/31/2013 -1/31/2013 Doc No Inv No Account No 307221 87896700 5842.5515 307131 310555 306874 38092 307132 1067416 307133 1068829 367903 113112013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 42.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306808 WO- 821044 -1 41.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306835 WO- 823241 -1 59.83 FILE POCKETS 306836 WO- 823395 -1 41.67 LABELS 306837 WO- 824126 -1 121.07 FILE FOLDERS 306838 WO- 825168 -1 53.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306839 WO- 825169 -1 80.05 REPORT COVERS 306935 OE- 307108 -1 61.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306936 OE- 307043 -1 535.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306937 WO- 825874 -1 85.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306938 WO- 826213 -1 185.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306980 WO- 822823 -1 31.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306981 WO- 824471 -1 26.14- RETURN 306982 CP- WO- 822823 -1 192.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003128 306983 W0= 823114 -1 7.21 DESK CALENDARS 00003128 306984 WO- 823114 -2 30.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003129 306985 WO- 823460 -1 12.41- RETURN - . 306986 CP- WO- 823114 -1 252.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306987 WO- 826951 -1 15.49 MESSAGE STAMP 307054 WO- 8226441 15.33 REPORT COVERS 307055 WO- 823802 -1 86.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 307056 OE- 307951 -1 66.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 307134 OE- 307245 -1 . 11.29 CALENDAR REFILL 307135 OE- 307397 -1 32.67- RETURN 307136 CP -OE- 307245 -1 81.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003122 307230 WO- 8207641 5520.5510 5842.5514 5520.5510 5520.5510 1600.6406 1600.6406 1550.6406 1550.6406 1550.6406 1550.6406 1260.6406 1260.6406 1600.6406 1600.6406 5862.6406 5862.6406 5862.6406 1400.6513 1400.6513 1400.6513 1400.6513 1550.6406 1190.6406 1190.6406 5110.6513 1140.6406 1140.6406 1140.6406 1400.6513 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page- 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ASSESSING ASSESSING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 367909 113112013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Council Check Register 71.50. ANTIFREEZE 00005982 306840 ! 1553.6530 1/31/2013 - 1131/2013 PEDALASSEMBLY Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 47.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 307231 WO- 821421 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 117.25 BRAKE CHAMBER, CLEVIS KIT 2,074.85 709360 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 188.17 ADJUSTER, KIT 367904 113112013 1553.6530 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 1,206.00 PREMIUM 306939 011913 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 18.00 SENIOR CLASS REFUND 1,206.00 011713 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 18.00 367905 1131/2013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 367911 1/3112013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 20.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001457 306940 83503 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 245.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003578 307137 83615 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5.87 PENS 00003578 307138 83615.1 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 272.01 367906 113112013 115358 BOHN, KENDALL 80.18 ART WORK SOLD 306903 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 80.18 367907 113112013 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 28.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003551 307139 80977803 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1,059.78 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003551 307140 80979063 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1,087.78 367908 1131/2013 120754 BOWER, LEAH 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page- 4 Business Unit ASSESSING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 EMT RECERTIFICATION 307141 012413 1470.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 367909 113112013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 71.50. ANTIFREEZE 00005982 306840 707434 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 250.92 PEDALASSEMBLY 00005983 306841 70775X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 118.09 BRACKETASSEMBLY 00005987 306941 709356 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 18.20 FUEL FILTER 00005987 306942 709382 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 117.25 BRAKE CHAMBER, CLEVIS KIT 00005987 307142 709360 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 188.17 ADJUSTER, KIT 00005987 307143 709390 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 764.13 367910 1131/2013 131525 BROWNELL, JOAN 18.00 SENIOR CLASS REFUND 307057 011713 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 18.00 367911 1/3112013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT-OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS 180.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 307267 012813 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 180.00 CITY OF EDINA 1/3012013 7:35:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 5 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367912 113112013 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 200.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 2!7/13 306842 010313 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 367913 1131/2013 102149 CALLAWAYGOLF 339.33 GOLF CLUBS 307232 924017037 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 339.33 367914 113112013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,329.15 306875 228268 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,329.15 367915 113112013 100677 CARGILL INC. 3,771.01 DE -ICER 306809 2900873378 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 13,451.44 306810 2900874764 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL . 3,829.69 306811 2900877147 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,903.65 306812 2900879591 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 14,907.10 306813 2900893323 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,532.25 306814 2900899407 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 39,244.94 306815 2900899791 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,601.38 306816 2900902486 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 80,241.46 367916 113112013 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 525.00 307006 95145 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 430.00 307007 95131 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 955.00 367917 1131/2013 129923 CAWLEY 45.27 NAME BADGES 30698B V140601 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 45.27 367918 113112013 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 3,078.20 8034001 -1 306943 8034001 -1/13 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 144.04 5596524 -8 306944 5596524 -1/13 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 42.78 5584310 -6 307058 5584310 -1/13 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 1,510.12 5584304 -9 307059 5584304 -1/13 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 12.82 5590919-6 307060 5590919 -1/13 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 4,787.97 367919 1/3112013 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 7 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Council Check Register Page - 6 1131/2013 - 1/3112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 151.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 307144 70812 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 151.00 367920 113112013 123898 CENTURYLINK t 61.23 952 922 -2444 307145 24441113 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 57.25 952 920 -1586 307146 1586 -1/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 118.48 367921 113112013 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 45,926.50 JOINT POWERS - 4TH QTR 307233 55767 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 45,926.50 367922 113112013 d 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 78.35 00102561- 0200862003 306817 200862003 -1113 5821.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 163.55 00102561 -0203163003 306818 203163003 -1/13 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY 73.02 001140640203163012 306819 203163012 -1/13 4091.6189 SEWER & WATER GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 726.11 00082050- 0200650009 306820 200650009 -1/13 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 548.76 00082050 - 0200650018 306821 200650018 -1/13 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 64.08 00101025- 0203610011 306822 203610011 -1/13 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 519.99 00101025 - 0203600013 306823 203600013 -1/13 1628.6189 SEWER& WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 17.77 00114667 -0210000012 307234 210000012 -1/13 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 50.87 00103426 - 0203158000 307235 203158000 -1/13 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 370.87 00103426- 0203502003 307236 203502003 -1/13 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 78.47 00082198- 0200815001 307237 200815001 -1/13 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 2,691.84 367923 113112013 131535 CMD PAINTING 1,000.00 PAINTING AT HORNETS NEST 00008036 307147 1 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 1,000.00 367924 113112013 i. 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 204.00 COCOA 00002392 307061 0741742 -IN 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 130.00 COCOA 00002392 307238 0741716 -IN 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 334.00 367925 113112013 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 1,322.00 SAW BLADES 00003557 307148 87699 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,322.00 367926 113112013 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 92.18 ART SUPPLIES 00009232 307062 INV000074808 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 31.00 CLAY 00009225 307239 INV000073672 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 67.20 CITY OF EDINA 306878 685611 5862.5515 1,831.15 Council Check Register 306879 685613 5842.5514 2,725.10 1131/2013 — 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,293.87 CLAY 00009225 307239 1W000073672 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 9900.2033.16 167.20- RETURN 307240 RTN000072971 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 367931 1,249.85 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 367927 113112013 101495 CREATIVE IMAGES ON RIBBON INC. SCREWDRIVERS, WRENCHES 00005893 306946 762579 1553.6556 111.89 SUPPLIES FOR CLASSES 307149 9016 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 367932 111.89 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 367928 113112013 5,122.31 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 306824 16014053060 1495.4380 802.88 BACKPACKS 307150 18735 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 367933 113112013 802.88 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 367929 1131/2013 151.20 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 307151 650487671 -1/13 5511.6188 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page- 7 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 67.20 306876 685614 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 759.55 306877 685610 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 67.20 306878 685611 5862.5515 1,831.15 306879 685613 5842.5514 2,725.10 367930 113112013 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURAN 2,062.15 STD INSURANCE 306945 011013 9900.2033.16 2,062.15 367931 113112013 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 88.57 SCREWDRIVERS, WRENCHES 00005893 306946 762579 1553.6556 88.57 367932 113112013 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 5,122.31 DEC 2012 SURCHARGE 306824 16014053060 1495.4380 5,122.31 367933 113112013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 151.20 650487671 307151 650487671 -1/13 5511.6188 151.20 367934 113112013 129080 DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC. 2,556.98 CAR WASH SOAP 00005789 306947 IN- 1157604 1553.6238 2,556:98 367935 1/31/2013 100744 EDINP. _ HAMBER OF COMMERCE 15.00 EMERGING LEADERS - K. MARTIN 306989 32797 1130.6106 15.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS Council Check Register 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 367936 113112013 100049 EHLERS 265.00 REGISTRATION - BILL NEUENDODRF 307063 PUBLIC FINANCE 9232.6104 SEMINAR 265.00 367937 113112013 131634 EIGNER, MICHELLE 5.00 SPRING CLASS OVERCHARGE REFUND 307152 012313 5511.6136 5.00 367938 1/3112013 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 1,916.81 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003871 307153 1524401 1470.6510 11.69 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003871 307154 1524829 1470.6510 1,928.50 367939 1131/2013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 73.22 FVP C31 -11AP 306843 1- 4080065 1553.6530 26.61 FILTER, HALOGEN CAPSULE 306844 69- 088796 1553.6530 5.29 OIL FILTER 306948 69- 089121 1553.6530 66.25 FVP 35 306949 69- 089076 1553.6530 171.37 367940 113112013 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 18.50 8326063 CLOCK PHOTOS 307155 T2- 320952 1130.6408 18.50 367941 1/31/2013 114339 FELDMANN IMPORTS 339.76 WINDOWS 00005943 306950 430376 1553.6530 339.76 367942 1131/2013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS' 208,885.36 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 306825 012513 05536.1705.30 208,885.36 367943 1131/2013 108644 FIRENET SYSTEMS INC. 486.28 FIRE DETECTION MAINTENANCE 00001851 306951 2016- 12- 10037SM 1375.6103 486.28 367944 113112013 131524 FIRST FIDUCIARY, CORP 88.05 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 307064 LUCILLE JOHNSON 1470.4329 88.05 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page- 8 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS . EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WATER METER REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367945 113112013 113987 FISHER, PETER 50.00 FIRE PROTECTION TEST 307156 REIMBURSE 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 62.65 FIRE PROTECTION BOOK 307156 REIMBURSE 1470.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 112.65 367946 113112013 102727 FORCE AMERICA 517.49 SPOOL 00005950 307157 01398462 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 239.84 MANIFOLD MOUNT 00005950 307158 01398557 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.39 O -RINGS 00005950 307159 - 01398463 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 768.72 367947 1/3112013 121634 FORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 1,154.25 THERMAL PAPER ROLLS 306845 130370 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,154.25 367948 113112013 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 40.20 IGNITION COIL 307160 71313800 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.20 367949 1/3112013 130239 GLADWIN MACHINERY & SUPPLY CO 229.15 PUNCH & DIE 00005977 307161 SIM.55581 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.00- CREDIT 00005199 307241 SCM.13183 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 205.15 367950 1131/2013 101103 GRAINGER 226.28 BATTERIES, BALLASTS 00001615 306952 9043341768 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 269.37 LIGHT FIXTURES 00001615 306953 9043041970 1553.6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 347.90 PORTABLE WORK LIGHTS 00001640 306954 9043041962 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 369.30 MOUNTING BRACKET 307065 9044559194 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,212.85 367951 113112013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 206.50 306880 148396 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,174.00 307008 148470 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING` 6,380.50 367952 113112013 131517 GREAT LAKES WEATHER SERVICE LL 1,155.00 WEATHER SERVICE 306955 111309 1280.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 1,155.00 367963 113112013 129922 GREATER MSP 10,000.00 MEMBERSHIP 307066 1082 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1131/2013 — 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CLASS REGISTRATION ART WORK SOLD 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 10 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONCESSION EQUIP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS BOARD & ROOM PRISONER ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 10,000.00 367964 113112013 131526 GREGG, WALTER 112.00 CLASS REFUND 307067 012213 5101.4607 112.00 367955 1/3112013 100155 GRI7TON, KAY 102.37 ART WORK SOLD 306904 011513 5101.4413 102.37 367956 113112013 101738 GTS EDUCATIONAL EVENTS 129.00 TRAINING - BRANDON KUSKE 307068 1145312- 5114910 1400.6104 0 129.00 367957 113112013 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 176.19 THERMAL ROLLS 00007515 306846 114350 5842.6512 176.19 367958 113112013 123248 HARMONIC RELIEF 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 2/10/13 306847 010313 5710.6136 150.00 367959 113112013 100798 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIPMENT 1,347.78 SET OF SEALS, THREADED RING 00005947 306956 C79462 1553.6530 1,347.78 367960 113112013 131529 HEIDER, JOHN 912.00 CONCESSIONS PROJECT 307242 79 5500.1785 912.00 367961 113112013 131518 HENDRICKSON TREE CARE 213.75 TREE REMOVAL 306957 1212013 1644.6103 213.75 367962 113112013 101871 HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS AS 100.00 DUES 307162 012413 1470.6105 100.00 367963 113112013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,554.00 DEC 2012 ROOM & BOARD 307243 1000024147 1195.6225 1,554.00 CLASS REGISTRATION ART WORK SOLD 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 10 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONCESSION EQUIP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS BOARD & ROOM PRISONER ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 196.00 CITY OF EDINA 367970 113112013 1/30/2013 7:35:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 462.83 CHLORINE 00002279 307170 13011408 5720.6545 CHEMICALS 462.83 Council Check Register Page - 11 367971 113112013 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS - 1/31/2013 - 1131/2013 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 307164 Check # Date Amount Suppller / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367964 1131/2013 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARO COMPANY 367972 113112013 131615 HOSTED, LINDSEY 17.10 SPEAKER BAR 00004300 307165 52301486 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 196.65 MONITOR 00004300 307166 52301535 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 213.75 367965 1/31/2013 103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 451.95 HAND SANITIZER, BODY WASH 00002277 307167 600539414 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 117.51 NUTRA -RINSE 00002280 307168 600543407 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,420.00 ALL CLEANER XP 307169 600548038 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,989.46 367966 113112013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 629.50 306881 632539 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 105.00 307009 632803 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,090.50 307010 632711 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,825:00 367967 113112013 130151 HOLLE, AMANDA 102.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 307244 123112 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 102.12 367968 113112013 102205 HOMBERGER, JEFF 11.86 MILEAGEREIM,:IRSEMENT 307069 012413 5410.6107 MILEAGEORALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 97.68 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 307245 123112 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 109.54 367969 113112013 131532 HOOK, TRAVIS 196 n' DOUBLE PAID FOR SPRING CLASS 307163 REFUND 5511 6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 196.00 367970 113112013 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY - 462.83 CHLORINE 00002279 307170 13011408 5720.6545 CHEMICALS 462.83 367971 113112013 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS - 181.93 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 307164 012413 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 179.26 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 307246 123112 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 361.19 367972 113112013 131615 HOSTED, LINDSEY 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 306905 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS TREES 8, MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 39.00 367973 113112013 100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES 7,940.00 2013 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 306848 080432 2310.6230 7.940.00 367974 113112013 128034= INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIAT 240.00 OFFICIATING FEES 306990 459 4077.6103 240.00 367975 113112013 131084 INSOLIA, BETH 294.00 DOUBLE PAID FOR SPRING CLASS 307171 REFUND 5511.6136 294.00 36':�!u 113112013 131531 JAYAVELU,SANKARGANESH 98.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 307197 012813 5511.6136 98.00 367977 113112013 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 337.24 BOOTS 00003563 307172 193542 421470.6710 3,619:52 FIRE GEAR 00003563 307173 193573 421470.6710 3,956.76 367978 113112013 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 218.59 FENDERETTE, RUB RAIL 306849 0020534 1553.6530 218.59 367979 113112013 102146 JESSEN PRESS 88.71 LETTERHEAD 306991 35934 1550.6406 156.04 NOTECARDS 306992 35935 1550.6406 319.56 NOTECARDS 307174 36052 1550.6406 584.31 367980 1/31/2013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 68.00 306882 1999992 5862.5514 3,898.60 307011 2029222 5842.5514 53.26- 307012 2029221 5842.5514 26.85- 307013 2029205 5862.5514 4,268.10 307090 2029204 5862.5514 169.40- 307222 1876399 5842.5514 7,985.19 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 12 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I EDINAATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER - ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT REPAIR PARTS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Council Check Register Page - 13 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367982 113112013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 566.77 306883 1482544 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 42.47- 306884 562476 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 93.87- 306885 562474 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 740.02 307014 1486731 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 112.99 307015 1486712 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,440.85 307016 1486733 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,331.58 307017. 1486729 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.99 307018 1486730 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,927.66 307019 1486711 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.00- 307020 563838 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.03- 307021 563735 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.70- 307022 563736 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.00- 307023 563734 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 15.00- 307024 563733 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 44.40 307091 1485870 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,738.60 307092 1486707 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 108.11 307093 1486717 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 390.60 307094 1486720 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,085.09 307095 1486732 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .19 307096 1486708 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.12 307097 1486716 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,190.36 307098 1486727 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,545.90 307099 1486725 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,623.83 307100 1486726 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .56 307101 1486714 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 307102 1486715 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 790.60 307103 1486724 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,172.95 307104 1486710 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,939.60 307105 1486709 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,677.17 307106 1486723 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,226.50 307107 1486728 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34.22- 307108 563489 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 44.40 307223 1485871 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 144.00 307224 1487209 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41,638.67 367983 1/3112013 114568 JOHNSON, MARTI L. 115.70 ART WORK SOLD 367984 1131/2013 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 306906 011513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 382.85 CITY OF EDINA MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 367985 1131/2013 Council Check Register 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 723.60 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 7.59 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5110.6235 POSTAGE 8.54 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5110.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 23.94 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.27 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 37.90 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.21 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.93 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.47 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.00 PETTY CASH 306993 012312 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 14 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION YORK OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 382.85 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 367985 1131/2013 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 723.60 LOADING DOCK HEATER 306850 179940 85.39 TIMER FOR WINE COOLER 306851 179643 808.99 367986 1131/2013 103230 JOHNSTON'S SALES & SERVICE 96.16 VACUUM PARTS 00006127 307070 3647 96.16 367987 113112013 131516 KARKHOFF, NANCY 5.00 REPLENISH CHECKING ACCT 306997 012413 350.00 REPLENISH CHECKING ACCT 306997 012413 440.25 REPLENISH CHECKING ACCT 306997 012413 79525 367988 1131/2013 114344 KRAEMER, KARIN 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 306907 011513 2925 367989 113112013 101995 KUDOS AWARDS INC. 32.06 CAR WASH LABELS 00001619 306958 14476 32.06 367990 113112013 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 187.95 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 307175 SIN464627 187.95 367991 1/3112013 131527 LARSON, LOUIS 81.00 CLASS REFUND 307071 012213 81.00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 14 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION YORK OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount. Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 367992 113112013 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 56.47 WASHERS 00005903 306852 9301363619 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 56.47 367993 113112013 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 99.00 307109 23326 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 99.00 367994 1131/2013 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 186.09 PRINTER INK 306994 012313 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT..GENERAL 186.09 367996 113112013 131528 LIVINGSTON, LORI 35.00 CLASS REFUND 307072 012213 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 35.00 367996 113112013 102129 LOVEGREEN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 123.00 REPAIR CONVEYER BELT 306959 106882 5821.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 123.00 367997 113112013 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,473.08 307225 146193 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,473.08 367998 113112013 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 110.68 LOBE, CLAMP, SEAL 00005937 306960 2130831 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 343.91 SEAL, WELDMENT „VISOR 00005936 306961 2130834 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.52 CONVEYOR BEARINGS 00005951 306962 2130963 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 517.11 367999 1/3112013 101146 MATRIX 297.87 307073 608077196 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 297.87 368000 113112013 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 973.42 SOFTBALLS 307074 10160 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 973.42 368001 1131/2013 100885 METRO SALES INC 130.09 COLOR METER USAGE 307247 49988A 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,874.22 COPIER USAGE 307248 495921 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,004.31 R55CKREG LOG20000 255.00 INSPECTOR EXAMS 307249 CITY OF EDINA 1470.6104 CONFERENCES &'SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 255.00 Council Check Register 368006 113112013 1/31/2013 — 1/31/2013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAWSEWER & Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 368002 1/31/2013 5913.6180 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS DISTRIBUTION 1,715.00 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 306995 4258 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/3112013 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 307177 4267 4077.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 285.00 CASTER WHEELS 00001582 306853 11103 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS 366003 1/3112013 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 685.45 CLEANING SUPPLIES 306826 34058 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 978.70 CLEANING SUPPLIES 306826 34058 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ETI 1400.6104 1,664.15 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,720.00 368004 113112013 121124 MILLER,,NANCY 368009 113112013 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 5.20 ART WORK SOLD 306908 012213 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 74.89 5.20 73763 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 368005 113112013 74.89 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATIO 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 16 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 100.00 368011 113112013 122036 M -K GRAPHICS 1,262.00 A/P CHECKS 307176 5957 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 1,262.00 - 255.00 INSPECTOR EXAMS 307249 1660 1470.6104 CONFERENCES &'SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 255.00 368006 113112013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAWSEWER & 1,715.00 CURBSTOP REPLACEMENT 00001644 306963 34289 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,715.00 368007 1/3112013 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 348.93 CASTER WHEELS 00001582 306853 11103 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 348.93 368008 1131/2013 101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS 1,720.00. CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 307075 ETI 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,720.00 368009 113112013 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 74.89 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009230 306964 73763 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 74.89 368010. 113112013 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION &.PARKAS 100.00 JOB POSTING 306854 7583 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 100.00 368011 113112013 122036 M -K GRAPHICS 1,262.00 A/P CHECKS 307176 5957 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 1,262.00 - R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Council Check Register Page - 17 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368012 1131/2013 102775 MN DNR ECO- WATERS -RES 140.00 WATER USE PERMIT 306965 2012 - INDIANHEAD 5933.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS PONDS & LAKES 140.00 368013 113112013 131536 MORNINGSIDE CONSTRUCTION INC. 965.00 CONCESSION PROJECT 307264 31280 5500.1785 CONCESSION EQUIP ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 965.00 368014 113112013 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 191.70 BUSHINGS 00001377 306827 881357 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 167.43- CREDIT 306828 881773 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 24.27 36801b 113112013 124121 MULLANEY, MARLA 79.30 ART WORK SOLD 306909 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 79.30 368016 113112013 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 668.96 BOOTS 00003566 307178 00377225 SNV 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 668.96 368017 113112013 121233 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT 641.25 FIRE SUPPRESSENT 00003567 307179 425204 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 641.25 368018 113112013 101472 NEHA 95.00 DUES - CHERYL ENGELMAN 307076 2245 -2013 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 95.00 368019 113112013 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHI 125.00 EDINA ART CENTER AD 307077 272219 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 125.00 368020 1/31/2013 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 160.00 TRAINING BOOKS /COUPONS 307078 4872 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 160.00 368021 1/3112013 102260 NORMAN, MIKE 33.80 ART WORK SOLD 306910 012213 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 33.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/31/2013 - 1/3112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368022 113112013 129787 NORTH DAKOTA RECREATON & PARK 125.00 NDRPA JOB POSTING 306855 223 1550.6121 125.00 368023 113112013 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 108.84 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003556 307180 900266150 1470.6510 108.84 368024 113112013 127377 NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL 8.40 EXPLORERS POST REGISTRATION 307250 POST#3411 1130.6103 8.40 368025 113112013 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 421.50 CANVAS, PAINTS, PENCILS 00009231 307079 43519500 5120.5510 421.50 368026 113112013 122129 NPELRA 175.00 DUES - JESS: CA NIKUNEN 307080 33276 1120.6105 175.00 368027 1131/2013 130141 OENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 559.50 307025 1128 5842.5513 559.50 368028 113112013 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 3,500.00 BUS GARAGE STUDY 306856 011613 9234.6136 3,500.00 368029 113112013 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 54.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306966 1541117740 5410.6408 11.38 SHIPPING 306967 1542761289 5440.6124 83.96 WALL BOARD, MARKERS 306968 640853732001 5410.6408 149.45 368030 1/31/2013 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 121.55 ART WORK SOLD 306912 011713 5101.4413 121.55 368031 1/3112013 124676 OKEE DOKEE BROTHERS 300.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 2/14/13 306857 010313 5710.6136 300.00 Subledger Account Description ADVERTISING PERSONNEL FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 18 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Council Check Register Page - 19 1/31/2013 - 1131/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368032 113112013 123786 OLSON, VICKI 61.10 ARTWORK SOLD 306911 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.10 368033 113112013 130333 O'MALLEY,MARYANNE 54.60 ART WORK SOLD 306913 012213 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 54.60 368034 113112013 104163 ORECK CORPORATION 79.33 CUST #03904314 VACUUM PARTS 00001585 307181 25645624 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 79.33 368035 1131/2013 130454 OVEN HEARTH WHOLESALE BAKERY 34.36 CONEY BUNS 307182 319939 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 34.36 CONEY BUNS 307183 320027 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 68.72 368036 113112013 129485 PAPCO INC. 573.92 FLOOR MATS 307081 76029 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 83.35 TOWELS, AIR FRESHENER 307082 76216 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 657.27 368037 113112013 129514 PAPER, ELIZABETH 33.41 ART WORK SOLD 306914 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 33.41 368038 113112013 119486 PARAGON BLACK DIRT 4,920.00 DISPOSAL OF LEAVES, SAND /DIRT 00005611 306969 4500 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES 8 MAINTENANCE 4,920.00 DISPOSAL OF LEAVES, SAND /DIRT 00005611 306969 4500 1301.61 BO CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4,920.00 DISPOSAL OF LEAVES, SAND /DIRT 00005611 306969 4500 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 14,760.00 368039 113112013 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 276.90 ART WORK SOLD 306915 012213 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 276.90 368040 113112013 102440 PASS, GRACE 47.45 ART WORK SOLD 306916 012213 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 47.45 368041 113112013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,966.22 306886 8385048 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 2,004.74 VERNON SELLING 97.25 ART WORK SOLD 5,068.21 012213 368042 113112013 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 1,190.00 IT CONSULTING 1,190.00 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 368043 113112013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 136.09 YORK SELLING 480.77 2368302 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/31/2013 - 1131/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 307026 8385034 -IN 5842.5513 307027 8385081 -IN 5822.5512 307191 11913007 307184 07972831 307185 07972798 307186 07972674 368044 1/3112013 116626 PETERSON, HARRIETTE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13.65 ART WORK SOLD 306917 012213 13.65 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 368045 1/3112013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 907.41 YORK SELLING 307028 2368302 .56 YORK SELLING 307029 2368292 1,731.68 YORK SELLING 307030 2368303 411.86 50TH ST SELLING 307031 2368293 579.76 YORK SELLING 307032 2368301 25.55 307033 2365385 37.12- 307034 3497608 474.39 307110 2368291 1,263.31 307111 2368297 57.12 307112 2368298 2,284.44 307113 2368300 754.58 307114 2368299 98.24 307115 2368997 1,374.60 307116 2368290 143.12 307117 2368294 36.00 307226 2368551 114.95 307227 2366860 10,220.45 368046 113112013 100953 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 3,866.00 LUCAS MAINTENANCE 00003551 307187 413029072 87.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003539 307188 113088064 3,953.20 1554.6103 5730.5510 5520.5510 5520.5510 5101.4413 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 1470.6180 1470.6510 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page - 20 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD ART WORK SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL `FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368047 113112013 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,276.44 MONTHLY SERVICE 307189 314600 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,276.44 368048 113112013 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,390.06 TIRES 00005760 306858 210040405 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.00 TIRE REPAIR 00005778 306970 210042842 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9,046.09 TIRES, SERVICE 00005778 306971 210042840 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10,541.15 368049 - 1/3112013 102856 PORTHAN, TODD 100.00 EXCESS BAGGAGE EXPENSE 307190 012413 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 368050 1131/2013 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 142.50 UPGRADE 307251 305428 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 172.34 ANTENNAS 307252 305491 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,723.96 CABLE 307253 305681 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,038.80 368051 1/3112013 100380 PRESI itUD, ROBERT 130.Od EMT RECERTIFICATION 306859 012213 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 130.00 368052 113112013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 573.44 ICE MELT 00002389 306996 5886 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 622.66 TOWELS, TISSUE, LINERS 00002274 307192 5874 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 857.47 WASTE CONTAINERS, SOAP, TOWED9008035 307193 5870 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,053.57 368053 1131/2013 126424 QUINN, MATTHEW 45.50 ART WORK SOLD 306918 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 45.50 368054 113112013 126936 REINDERS INC. 435.28 SIDEWALK SALT 00001609 306972 3019000 -00 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 435.28 368055 113112013 100978 RIEDELL SHOES INC. 974.76 ICE SKATES 00008030 307194 54558939 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 974.76 i R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1130/2013 7:35:59 Council Check Register Page 22 1131/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368056 113112013 129088 RING, LOIS 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 306919 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 368057 113112013 106171 ROSE, SARAH 115.05 ART WORK SOLD 306920 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 115.05 368058 113112013 131533 SAHARA, LYDIA 98.00 PAID TWICE FOR SPRING CLASS 307195 REFUND 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 98.00 368059 1131/2013 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 36.62 101 - """'9350 FOOD 307196 007642 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 36.62 368060 113112013 118168 SANSIO 733.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 307198 INV 097742013 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 EMS FAXING 307254 INV 09615 -2012 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 783.00 368061 113112013 100990 SCHARBER S SONS 534.85 TIGHTENER, BELT, LINK 00005979 306860 P07268 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 534.85 368062 113112013 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 90.35 ART WORK SOLD 306921 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 90.35 368063 113112013 105514 SCHIRO, DOUG 96.00 2013 UNIFORM PURCHASE 306861 011813 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.00 368064 113112013 108694 SCHWALM, ELISABETH 149.50 ART WORK SOLD 306922 011713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 149.50 368065 1/31/2013 100995 SEH 778.23 ANTENNAE MODIFICATIONS 307255 264909 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 112.65 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01393.1705.20 ' CONSULTING DESIGN MENDELSSOHN A 225.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01398.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LAKE EDINA B R55CKREG 'LOG20000 113112013 120784 SIGN PRO CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register DASHERBOARD 306863 6322 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/31/2013 — 1/3112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 294.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01238.1705.21 6323 337.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 07105.1705.20 WALL GRAPHICS 450.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 07108.1705.20 675.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01394.1705.20 882.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01368.1705.21 901.23 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01241.1705.21 307257 957.54 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01388.1705.21 37.41 957.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 46001.6710 368070 1,013.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 1260.6103 1,126.54 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 07047.1705.20 68514014 1,351.85 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 1260.6103 1,487.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01386.1705.21 1/3112013 1,577.17 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 07046.1705.20 2,023.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01387.1705.21 2,023.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 01385.1705.21 2,309.41 ENGINEERING SERVICES 307256 257560 05499.1705.20 19,485.36 368068 1/3112013 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 575.90 ART WORK SOLD 306923 011713 5101.4413 575.90 368067 113112013 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 85.43 PAINT 00001575 306862 8852 -2 1551.6406 85.43 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN ART WORK SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES 113012013 7:35:59 Page - 23 Business Unit A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC S105 TH100 SIDEWALK S108 SCHOOL ROAD NORMANDALE BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON A -241 WEST 70TH LANDSCAPING RICHMOND HILLS PK FIBER OPTIC CABLING ENGINEERING GENERAL W 42ND ST SIDEWALK ENGINEERING GENERAL VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD XERXES AVE SIDEWALK VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD WM-499 RAW WATER WELL2 TO WTP6 ART CENTER REVENUES CITY HALL GENERAL 368068 113112013 120784 SIGN PRO 197.72 DASHERBOARD 306863 6322 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 197.72 DASHERBOARD 306864 6321 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 197.72 DASHERBOARD 306865 6323 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,070.38 WALL GRAPHICS 307199 6360 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,663.54 368069 113112013 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 37.41 DEC 2012 MONTHLY FEE 307257 65552 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 37.41 368070 113112013 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 336.80 REPAIRS TO GROUND FAULT PANEL 307258 68514014 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 336.80 368071 1/3112013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1130/2013 7:35:59 Council Check Register Page - 24 1/3112013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # : Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,794.50 306887 2004901 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,774.17 306988 2009011 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,639.33 306889 2009007 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,270.60 307035 2019118 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,097.50 307036 2004903 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,227.02 307037 2019123 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,282.73 307038 2009012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 536.95 307039 2019119 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 120.50 307118 2004906 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17,743.30 306998 873184124 -122 1490.6188 53.43 368072 113112013 110977 SOW, ADAMA 724.75 ART WORK SOLD 306924 012213 5101.4413 724.75 368073 1/3112013 104672 SPRINT 2.70 306998 873184124 -122 1628.6188 3.90 306998. 873184124 -122 5511.6188 25.15 306998 873184124 -122 1180.6103 35.06 306998 873184124 -122 1190.6188 36.60 306998 873184124 -122 7411.6188 42.90 306998 873184124 -122 4090.6188 44.53 306998 873184124 -122 1554.6230 51.47 306998 873184124 -122 1400.6406 51.51 306998 873184124 -122 1490.6188 53.43 306998 873184124 -122 4204.6406 53.43 306998 873184124 -122 1260.6406 64.50 306998 873164124 -122 5422.6188 66.60 306998 873184124 -122 5720.6188 83.19 306998 873184124 -122 1260.6188 104.40 306998 873184124 -122 1553.6188 127.50. 306998 873184124 -122 1495.6188 168.45 306998 873184124 -122 1301.6188 176.70 306998 873184124 -122 1240.6188 193.02 306998 873184124 -122 1322.6188 286.20 306998 873184124 -122 1640.6188 529.68 306998 873184124 -122 5910.6188 788.55 306998 873184124 -122 1470.6151 1,815.57 306998 873184124 -122 1400.6188 4,805.04 368074 1/3112013 129746 ST LOUIS PARK DQ GRILL AND CHI ART WORK SOLD TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL TELEPHONE ART CENTER REVENUES SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS ELECTION ASSESSING PSTF OCCUPANCY 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH HEALTH ALERT NETWORK ENGINEERING GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 1/31/2013 — 113112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 17.99 BIRTHDAY CAKE 307200 597 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 159.60 DILLY BARS 307200 597 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 22.99 BIRTHDAY CAKE 307201 598 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 200.58 368075 113112013 131614 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC. 41.04 NOTARY STAMP 306866 270865 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 41.04 368076 113112013 116175 ST. CROIX HARLEY - DAVIDSON 1,118.40 FLEET MAINTENANCE 307259 639975 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,118.40 368077 113112013 105387 ST. PAUL LINOLEUM & CARPET CO. 7,820.00 NEW CARPET 307083 0066411 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 7,820.00 368078 1131/2013 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 7.08 KEYS 00007167 306829 902437662 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 7.08 368079 1131/2013 129409 STEEN, BARB 279.83 ART WORK SOLD 306925 012213 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 279.83 368080 113112013 101015 STREICHERS 149.99 BOOTS 00003507 307204 1994037 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.99 368081 113112013 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 1,979.94 WIRING FOR EDINA LIQUOR 307202 16304 5800.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 740.04 MOVED DATA CABINET 307203 16305 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,719.98 368082 113112013 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 100.00 DOOR DENT REPAIR 307205 622597 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,565.61 VEHICLE REPAIRS 307206 622382 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,665.61 368083 113112013 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 96,392.59 2013 OSSI ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 306999 59031 -SF 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 96,392.59 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Council Check Register Page- 26 1/31/2013 — 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368084 113112013 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,275.44 306890 009588 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 686.00 307260 008254 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,961.44 368085 113112013 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 32.47 ART WORK SOLD 306926 012213 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 32.47 368086 113112013 108509 TAFFEE, MARY 97.50 ART WORK SOLD 306927 011313 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES i 97.50 368087 1/3112013 101027 TARGET BANK 35.66 X- XXX -XX9 -840 HEADSET 307084 011813 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 35.66 368088 113112013 130367 TASC 187.00 COBRAADM;:J 306867 IN148732 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL i 187.00 mualil 113112013 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 69.63 COFFEE 307207 NEIGHBORHOOD 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING FORUM 69.63 368090 113112013 128085 TELFER, JOHN 48.75 ART WORK SOLD 306928 012213 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 368091 113112013 101526 THOMPSON, BETTY 66.13 ART WORK SOLD 306929 012213 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 86.13 368092 1/3112013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY . 1,148.35 307040 733578 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,148.35 368093 113112013 101474 TITLEIST 534.00 MERCHANDISE 307085 1235390 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 534.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE RECYCLING CITY OF EDINA TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL TELEPHONE Council Check Register CONSTR: IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CONCESSION EQUIP ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 1/31/2013 - 1/3112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368094 113112013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 17.78 WELDING SUPPLIES 00002390 307000 122832 5761.6406 17.78 368095 113112013 131519 TRANSPORT GRAPHICS 748.02 BANNERS 306973 EM- 110312 1280.6406 748.02 368096 113112013 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 105.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 307001 102009475 1550.6121 105.00 368097 113112013 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 683.10 FILTERS 307208 0525122 -IN 5511.6406 683.10 368098 1131/2013 131382 US FOODS CULINARY EQUIPMENT & 354.01 RAILINGTABLES 307209 8485537 5511.6406 354.01 368099 113112013 102909 VADNAIS, SCOTT 385.00 BLUE CARD TRAINING FEE 307210 012413 1470.6104 385.00 368100 113112013 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.93 306868 2856453208 1240.6188 32.93 306868 2856453208 5952.6188 40.01 306868 2856453208 1260.6188 40.01 306868 2856453208 1120.6188 41.70 306868 2856453208 1600.6188 334.47 306868 2856453208 1470.6188 522.05 360101 1/3112013 - 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 232.37 UPGRADE AT HORNETS NEST 00001517 307265 6952765 5500.1705 346.14 CONCESSION PROXHORNETS NESIf0001517 307266 6952376 5500.1785 578.51 368102 1131/2013 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 241.96 FOOD 307211 35551264 5520.551C 395.58 FOOD 307212 35578455 5520.551C Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES 1/30/201' 7:35:59 Page - 27 CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE RECYCLING TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSTR: IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CONCESSION EQUIP ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 206.03 JUICE 307213 35593754 5520.5510 463.06 FOOD 307214 35682725 5520.5510 4091.6103 4090.6103 5101.4413 1470.6104 5862.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5515 5862.5515 5822.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5822.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5513 5862.5512 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD 1/3012013 7:35:59 Page - 28 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 50TH&FRANCE. MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF.GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING - 1,306.63 368103 1/31/2013 102542 WALKER RESTORATION CONSULTANTS 1,300.00 PARKING R:'..::P INSPECTION 307261 21388100001 4,900.00 PARKING RAMP INSPECTION 307261 21388100001 6,200.00 368104 1131/2013 124743 WALSTED, KRISTEN 94.25 ART WORK SOLD 306930 012213 94.25 368106 1131/2013 123364 WHITE, SHAUN 385.00 BLUE CARD TRAINING FEE 307215 012213 385.00 368106 113112013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 544.25 307041 320832 -00 2,009.70 307042 320702 -00 2,553.95 368107 113112013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 488.44 307043 441148 291.36- 307044 60251 768.96 307119 441147 966.04 368108 113112013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 716.12 306891 167261 49.10 306892 168612 44.00 306893 168609 2,338.99 306894 168611 6,143.68 307045 168606 6,103.75 307046 158608 1,967.91 307047 168610 1.15 307048 168441 6,528.33 307049 168613 81.44 307050 168614 4,161.40 307051 168615 228.30- 307052 876425 965.85 307120 170121 4091.6103 4090.6103 5101.4413 1470.6104 5862.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5515 5862.5515 5822.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5822.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5513 5862.5512 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD 1/3012013 7:35:59 Page - 28 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 50TH&FRANCE. MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF.GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 1/30/2013 7:35:59 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 25.21 307121 168607 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 28,898.63 368109 1/3112013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 1,888.70 306895 111808 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,482.00 306896 111244 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,878.39 306897 110917 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 296.00 306898 110916 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 306899 110915 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 48.00 306900 110678 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 306901 110677 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,859.00 306902 110676 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,764.22 307122 113892 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 120.00 307123 113893 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,357.84 368110 113112013 122046 WOMEN IN LEISURE SERVICES 75.00 REGISTRATION - DONNA TILSNER 307217 WORKSHOP 1600.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 75.00 368111 1131/2013 102228 WOOLDRIDGE, MARY 27.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 306974 011813 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 102.95 MILEAGE REIM" 'RSEMENT 307262 123112 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 130.07 368112 1131/2013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,438.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 307263 40 -01686 -020 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,438.00 368113 1/31/2013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 47.56 51- 5276505 -8 306975 354154370 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 60.79 51- 4420190 -3 307086 354834129 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,467.85 51- 6644819 -9 307216 355353221 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 9,576.20 368114 1/3112013 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 19,470.51 UNLEADED FUEL 00005575 306976 536795 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,730.00 DIESEL FUEL 00005975 306977 536794 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32,200.51 368115 113112013 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 734.00 307124 11705 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/31/2013 — 1/31/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 734.00 368116 1/3112013 101091; ZIEGLER INC 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 306869 E6395946 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 827.32 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 306870 SW050194460 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 593.74 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 306871 SW050194221 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,871.06 828,417.54 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 828,417.54 Total Payments 828,417.54 1/30/2013 7:35:59 Page- 30 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 1/31/2013 - 1/31/2013 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 354,626.81 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 7,940.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 21,917.54 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 4,625.72 05100 ART CENTER FUND 6,154.61 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 37.41 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 1,797.23 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 17,027.42 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 18,178.49 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,310.73 05800 LIQUOR FUND 151,547.07 05900 UTILITY FUND. 218,287.53 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 5,060.00 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.93 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 10,608.90 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,703.00 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 3,500.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,062.15 Report Totals 828,4117.54 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies nd Procedures date / 3 I M 1/30/2013 7:38:07 Page- 1 N 0 (-k a •,MroRPORPT °- • lees To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV.0 From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action 2 Discussion ❑ Date: February 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -18, Lot Division, 5700 & 5712 Grove Street. Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. Information / Background: Mr. Wayne Fridlund is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides the two properties at 5700 and 5712 Grove Street. The purpose of the request is to shift the side lot line five feet to the east to provide adequate area to build a second stall to the existing garage at 5712 Grove Street. (See property location, proposed lot line shift and narrative on pages Al —A9 of the Planning Commission staff report.) There is an existing NSP easement, with overhead wires that would have to be shifted before any garage would constructed. (See easement on page A9 and picture on page A10.) Planning Commission Recommendation: On January 23, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Lot Division. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2012 -18 • Draft minutes from the January 23, 2013 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, January 23, 2013 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50`" St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-18 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION OF 5700 AND 5712 GROVE STREET WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Parcel A - 5712 Grove Street: Lot 3, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County MN. Parcel B - 5700 Grove Street: Lot 2, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County MN. WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels') described as follows: Parcel A - 5712 Grove Street: See Attached Exhibit A Parcel B - 5700 Grove Street: See Attached Exhibit A WHEREAS, the requested lot line adjustment is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved pursuant to City Code Sections 850 and 810.04 Subd. 2, and further subject, however, to the provision that the NSP easement that runs along the existing side lot line would have to be shifted five feet to the east, and the overhead power lines would have to be moved five feet to the east before issuance of a building permit for a garage addition. Adopted this 5TH day of February, 2013. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-18 Page Two ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 5, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk Exhibit A PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL "A": Lot 3, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and the West 5 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, lying South of the Easterly extension of the North line of said Lot 3. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL "B Lot 2, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the West 5 feet of said Lot 2 lying South of the Easterly extension'of the North line of Lot 3, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A. Lot Division. 5700 and 5712 Grove Street Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Wayne Fridlund is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides the two properties at 5700 and 5712 Grove Street. The purpose of the request is to shift the side lot line five feet to the east to provide adequate area to build a second stall to the existing garage at 5712 Grove Street. There is an existing NSP easement, with overhead wires that would have to be shifted before any garage would constructed. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5700 and 5712 Grove Street. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The purpose of the lot line adjustment is to provide area to expand the existing garage. 3. The resulting lots would exceed the median lot area requirement. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. 2. The NSP easement that runs along the existing side lot line would have to be shifted five feet to the east, and the overhead power lines would have to be moved five feet to the east before issuance of a building permit for the garage addition. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved to recommend lot division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Ok Pi PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 23, 2013 VI.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Mr. Wayne Fridlund is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides the two properties at 5700 and 5712 Grove Street. The purpose of the request is to shift the side lot line five feet to the east to provide adequate area to build a second stall to the existing garage at 5712 Grove Street. (See property location, proposed lot line shift and narrative on pages Al —A9.) There is an existing NSP easement, with overhead wires that would have to be shifted before any garage would constructed. (See easement on page A9 and picture on page Al 0.) Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding properties and uses are include single - family homes zoned and guided low- density residential to the north east and south; and the Good Samaritan Church, zoned and guided low- density residential located to the west. (See page A3.) Existing Site Features Single- family homes are located on both parcels. Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Primary Issue Low - density residential R -1, Single- family residential • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. The resulting lot line shift does not create an additional lot. As demonstrated below, both lots would still exceed the median lot area and width in the neighborhood. The lot depths of both lots would remain the same. . Minimum Lot Size Requirements Existing 5712 Grove St. Existing 5700 Grove St. Proposed 5712 Grove St. Proposed 5700 Grove St. Lot Area — 12,077 s.f. 13,293 s.f. 18,429 s.f. 13,918 s.f. 17,804 s.f. Lot Width — 90 feet 104 feet 126 feet 109 feet 121 feet Lot Depth — 134 feet 124 feet 145 feet 124 feet 145 feet Any new construction on either of these two lots would be subject to conformance with all of the City's rules and regulations regarding lot coverage, building height, and setbacks. Before the proposed garage addition was built, the existing NSP easement and overhead power line would have to be relocated. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5700 and 5712 Grove Street: Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The purpose of the lot line adjustment is to provide area to expand the existing garage. 3. The resulting lots would exceed the median lot area requirement. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. 2. The NSP easement that runs along the existing side lot line would have to be shifted five feet to the east, and the overhead power lines would have to be moved five feet to the east before issuance of a building permit for the garage addition. Deadline for a city decision: March 5, 2013 0) APPLIC*kT.. Rt � PA AT 10 5171Z O-oof Siro c-& on zL�� E0 54 /o-Z 6 (do 6PIx e l- } rr�o <n- 5900 Grave, % A(,5 wo v/d y Con S' -Irr, c� /p a- ��o cc r y 6rf el\,C(, YCI 7L 4�4,f, rr a- .e ��re < 5 cll�- PL Gt/�d� � K V tl 61n 7'11-r- v 0 rr lva1-6�e rA- ScaSS� lj - e-ll2 -erilt Hof ��e .4I 5912 VES ISIS Ml 5821 Wri b704 5708 928 !74 5712 5408 3/J6 5832 5820 5816 5716 !9Q 5/12 ,y Of 3857 3873 3829 ez5 921 017 F s 4 AM U24 SAW W 16 SBW S-9 5000 AWDR 5904 5805 7901 55901 5813 9/12 sage � sap9 X06 6806 'SW8 SM $813 5912 5 5904 3900 580! 5504 5636 9817 381G 38W 5/220 $921 �J9053807 9135809 9lINR0 7823 5805 5908 1m W36 W40 5901 24 -2' � 6020 SO 55`4 5912 W50 59eo 3970 <L J ya L City of Edina 713 5613(609 "W' "00 1668123W/5604136W 14 24 570. 21 55613300 ]0 310/ gran v<n lwma' SWS 6608 5608 24 5873 101670 5612 24 21 3224 1fAS11res leR Hawk9� k0 _. $223 9712 57055701 MIT ? t. 8208 1 i CC 5721 5706 5700 27 620\ 3625 ; 5717 'R �37U 5703 3701 va SW ;'— 5709 670! ,-5108 SWS •' 5108 576437! 700 B09 5705 5230 -' 5609 $608 5609 7ef2 24 5316 5123508 „ 3616 5501 3300 �� Aa10EPARRRO ,�<pg 5513 509 5505 3300 t 3513 Asia 0512 � 3317 0612 0316 5521 ,AM 8525 5621 \„�23 5524 24 552! 5513 532 3537 Wrd<n van 5719 5543 Legend S.—u�'ng Hvusc Number HOUSC Number Labels Street Hame Labels ./ City Limits A/ Creeks D Lake Names I—I Lekes Parks D Parcels D 5615 6612 5617 3616 $621 5620 5013 $621 5629 U26 5/00 5W4 $632 3636 16763672 85601 0 5623 L 1 31, ISIS Ml 5821 Wri b704 5708 928 !74 5712 5408 3/J6 5832 5820 5816 5716 !9Q 5/12 ,y Of 3857 3873 3829 ez5 921 017 F s 4 AM U24 SAW W 16 SBW S-9 5000 AWDR 5904 5805 7901 55901 5813 9/12 sage � sap9 X06 6806 'SW8 SM $813 5912 5 5904 3900 580! 5504 5636 9817 381G 38W 5/220 $921 �J9053807 9135809 9lINR0 7823 5805 5908 1m W36 W40 5901 24 -2' � 6020 SO 55`4 5912 W50 59eo 3970 <L J ya L 6008 Wpp 6081 -12 6x08 W ra PID:3211721420030 5712 Grove St Edina, MN 55436 /1 NKiFRn1m AD 6101 5317 8513 SSOB 3503 1301 6105 15 }T 5'`W 5504 SSW 5708 57 6712 3716 713 5613(609 "W' "00 1668123W/5604136W 14 24 570. 21 55613300 ]0 310/ gran v<n lwma' 3730 5801 aqmf ST 8726 711 s7o0 5801 5613 asps 560! 5/00 5W4 SW1 Sao3 6311 35!55509 Seal 5623 L 1 31, cT 3/09 9616 3/0/ SAO 24 AM 71 21571757115703 sloe 576} 5820 7812 5808 S80e 3811 5817 5824 LYLECiR `•'613 TT 0-- 3714 5712 5708 5706 9700 tai 5e21 6 9521 6317 sx 520 5506 6301 sW, 16 AM 5513 $424 SB25 3604 /sp11rt'r/nv>: BFMdJAYE S51f _ 1567 5603 8904 5301 3909 60! 3603 55U �� 5323 21 5317 59W 5729 5909 3919 560/ 5313 tT 3701 6611 20 1c 83604 5316 !!125508 5005500 5520 245420 r-T 215611 9611 93603 Sec COUVTRY9nERD 3Zf -17 53135I 5 09 3505 5301 21 ASIA 6000 �/ 5510 5516 bB00 73 }7 3508 5504 5300 i 6004 6005 5601 6008 Wpp 6081 -12 6x08 W ra PID:3211721420030 5712 Grove St Edina, MN 55436 /1 NKiFRn1m AD 6101 5317 8513 SSOB 3503 1301 6105 15 }T 5'`W 5504 SSW f� 5730 } °t 3 5716 5730 5804 5720 1 1 a 5712 GROVE ST 5801 5721 5717 5711 5709 5705 5701 5805 5604 5600 5714 5712 5708 5704 5700 5716 L-L SFTl1YN'1 A VE ai.p a� max, AIMS • cov riq�f M) tCGE mars any 5616 5612 560E 5604 5640 WARDER AYE 5715 56f3 5609 v,fi75 5100 5616 5612 5608 5604 5600 GROVE ST 5801 5800 5613 5609 5605 5805 5804 5809 k5600 5620 561 u 6813 5824 5817 5828 5821 5608 5604 5825 9EMTON A VE i ; -. , j� ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Mimetoaka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax(952)2250502 SURVEY FOR WAYNE FRIDL UND SURVEYED: April, 2010 DRAFTED: November 20, 2012 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. ron wu, Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as. ] easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been I C shown. C 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important. u� 3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the.comers of the property. I 3 I STANDARD SYMBOLS &CONVENTIONS: av I � m Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State [ ] c License Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted. LIj z CERTIFICATION: O I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under I �f my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineer and a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. I �_ Jarfigs,11. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 Iv 8 31 e I <e I t? a N_ OI ar V/ t GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) EXISTING W Q' V R, 1 f•. S 89'55'17" E CROYE ST. 120794 11 20 20.12 .4 JP E fSFflVrr I ADVANCL SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax(952)2250502 suRyEY FoR: WAYNE FRIDL UND SURVEYED: April, 2010 DRAFTED: November 20, 2012 ORIGINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: I / / Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. / PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL "A ": / Lot 3, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and the West 5 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, Fridlund's I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under Addition, lying South of the Easterly extension of the North IY rte" I line of said Lot 3. I i PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL "B ": C Lot 2, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County, C � Minnesota, except the West 5 feet of said Lot 2 lying South I of the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 3, Block 2, Fridlund's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. u_ SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I 3 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the ICI I above legal description. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or I ] o consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make > z sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. LJ� 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we I �l- deemed important. 3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to I = PROPO.LSE10 N E%ISTNG DWELLING N 8958'49" E -- 230.77 -- T I L_U � rT mark the comers of the o Pr PertY• I _ 5 _..._ .__.. — 59.79— STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "0" Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State N 89'54'03' E License Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted. I I CERTIFICATION: II I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under I my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineer E and a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of I I Minnesota. � I 0 I fl � 1A Jai es . Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 d ICI I S 89'56'24" E -- 126.23 -- e 3 ; - - - - -- PARCEL "A" 13,623 S0. FTY - - - - -- - - -- - -- PARCEL "B" 17.677 So. F-r.- n 7.1 ' I t6� E 9nNC NC K. 5 GRAPHIC SCALE I �v• jj \� 20 0 10 20 40 15 ( IN MR' S 89.55'17" E Gh'OVE ST. z - -T a 13 Ip mo o I Z �✓ I § s g E o o m 0 0 I Z �3 W V -- 121.07 -- S 89'55'17" E 120784 11 20 21912 14 ./,P PP19P17 qR1) 'G CO. Z) 225 0502 )121 EXISTING DWELLING N 89*58'49" E --230.77-- IRON --115,97-- FOUND IRON [I 3-I 0) C) C) z I (---\ -T- A t ooel?o FOUND 06, N 89*54'03" E --104.25-- to 0) 0 S 89'56'24" E --126.23-- FOUND IRON 36.6 35-2 . .......... --------- _ ---- 34.5 F F5 —16.6 3 XISTING DWELLI 3 5.4 7/m i i o/ 7 3: OC) in I o C C) 00 to 0 v P p 1 z r- C-4 1 CD 13.9 i 0 za "al 10 DECK .3 183 4.7 14.. 10.7 -n DWELLI NG /EXIS NG 16. 13.2 I A C\ v 7.. 5.6 --103.98-- 126.07-- S 89*55*17" E E ST s 89'55'17" E CPO V 1 ,?0784 -/-/ 90 2012 ,4 1P ErISF) G CO. .> 225 0502 PROPO E- EXISTING DWELLING N 89'58'49" E -- 230.77 -- FOUND IRON C 13 I ^ CV O /1T o r I L -v Iz z �°i Lti, r..> > .:mac• z I S 8956'24" E A' -- 126.23 -- •Y 00. aqo FOUND IRON r FOUND IRON- -- -_ 30.0 S 6.8 7 N 89'54'03" E I I g I I g 34. II I y I I ' Fr .6 ' II ,p Y� EXISTING DWE ING 5.4 I<I I I Z I 7!m 13 . 2s ' � o •" ------ PARCEL rl A n 13.623 SQ. FT; - - - - - -- - , - - - -- PARCEL "B" 17,677 SQ. FT. - ------ - - - - -- 0 II �Z I 13 9 I I i 0 Z 1 D Z DECK / I I o I 3 7 3 183 6 , . 115_Zl_ a S NG WNG m G m I \ \ a 5.6 � \ J Eli FOUND IRON WI' IRON -- 108.98-- �y -- 121.07 -- S 89'55'17" E /i�'f S 89'55'17" E R9 GROIN' ,57= 1 �1 ,90784 11 20 2012 �4 JP PROM -- - Z R, N A vi ST, 7 SK m 0-4p Of ® .;� lap ------- ..... Aps, IRS?, V. I p �Rv A 6a I I _q RI Vj d MY. 'ell .' Aw —Nd- Ao Tz. tJ; i SID", xm iv I - I.Mb., r._ .., -- •.. I - — `5 11 11 - Ifts, yp �Xl x • jr A!f..ATf.' 1, - Aj AMI A•Ri viffi zzz fl, Pro • -W-A 4 IM -434 M�z M -Alp 0 M;N, -1 -N . tit R-W p V�. A, N;� -4 -7777= AA LMM -- - Z R, N A vi ST, 7 SK m 0-4p Of ® .;� lap ------- ..... Aps, IRS?, V. I p �Rv A 6a I I _q RI Vj d MY. 'ell .' Aw —Nd- Ao Tz. tJ; i SID", xm iv I - I.Mb., r._ .., -- •.. I - — `5 11 11 - Ifts, yp �Xl x • jr A!f..ATf.' 1, - Aj AMI A•Ri viffi zzz fl, Pro • -W-A 4 IM -434 M�z M -Alp 0 M;N, -1 -N . tit R-W p V�. A, N;� -4 -7777= R :QUEST FOR PU 'CHAS b IIN :XC SS OO F $209000 /CHANG : OO RD R To: Mayor & Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering Date: February 5, 2013 Subject: Browndale Avenue Bridge Scour Repairs, Contract No. ENG 13 -6NB Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: January 28, 2013 Company: I. Sunram Construction, Inc. 2. Landwehr Constructiion, In.c Recommended Quote or Bid: Sunram Construction, Inc. General Information: Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget X NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: March 28, 2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: 1. $42,103.50 2.$62,732.60 $42,103.50 The Browndale Avenue Bridge Scour Repairs Project was initiated due to a failure of the scour countermeasures below the dam. The failure occurred during the high flows of 2011. The original scour measures were installed in 2008 as part of the Browndale Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation Project. See photos on next page. This emergency project is funded by the storm sewer fund. Staff is working with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the design engineers, and the product manufacturer to recuperate a portion of the repair costs. Staff recommends awarding the bid to Sunram Construction, Inc. If approved by Council, the project must be completed by March 5, 2013 prior to the spring melt. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER During construction — 2008 After high flows - 201 1 G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PROJECTS \CONTRACTS \2013 \ENG 13-6NB Browndale BR Scour Repair \ADMIN \MISC \Item xxx Request for Purchase - Browndale Scour Repairs ENG13- 6NB.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 w�1N�,r ow e 1 • RPORI�,tFi,� ldBB To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: IV.E. The Recommended Bid is From: Ann Kattreh, Parks and Recreation Director ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Date: 2/5/13 Subject: Request for Purchase - Two Smithco Sand Rakes, Braemar Golf Course Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 12/21/12 Company: Turfwerks Recommended Quote or Bid: Tu rfwerks Bid or Expiration Date: 2/28/13 Amount of Quote or Bid: $20,513.59 General Information: This request is for the purchase of two new Smithco sand rakes. We own three of these machines which are used at Braemar and Fred Richard's Golf Courses to rake the bunkers. They are used to rake the bunkers seven days a week. The price is .broken down as follows: (1) Smithco Super Star LE Sand Rake $12,247.00 (1) Smithco Super Star LE Sand Rake $12,247.00 Trade 2007 Smithco Sand Rake -$2,500.00 Trade 2007 Smithco Sand Rake -$2,800.00 Sales Tax $ 1.319.59 Total $20,513.59 In 2013, $145,000 is budgeted for maintenance equipment replacement. After this purchase, $59,700 will remain in this fund. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 v gp �y �o. �RPORf`K To: City Council Agenda Item #s_ IV. F. The Recommended Bid is From: Martin Scheerer ® Within Budget O NotWithin Budget Date: February 5, 2013 Subject: Request For Purchase — Personal Protective Equipment, Fire Department Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: January 16, 2013 January 23, 2012 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Jefferson Fire & Safety $48,225.46 Fire Equipment Specialties $25,751.44 Recommended Quote:or Bid: Jefferson Fire & Safety Fire Equipment Specialties General Information: This request for purchase is for the replacement of 36: sets of fire department Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The PPE consists of structural firefighting coats, pants; boots, helmets and gloves. The PPE would replace current: PPE that does not meet current National :Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards. We used two separate vendors for this purchase. The. necessity for two vendors and products was to accommodate the different firefighter's size and fit of the PPE. The funding for this purchase would come from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Assistance to Firefighters (FireAct) grant program ( #EMW -20 I I - FO- 09965) in the amount of $74,520.00 which was approved by City Council on March 6, 2012. Both Jefferson Fire & Safety and Fire Equipment Specialties have been awarded the Hennepin County Fire Chiefs Consortium contract for purchase, of which the City of Edina is a member. I would recommend the approval of the total purchase of $73,976.90 w "10 k, A. O e. • ,^�RPORP��O • iaas To: City Council Agenda Item M. IV. G. From: Lisa Schaefer, HR Director Action ED Discussion ❑ Date: February 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Approval of 2013 Minnesota Pay Equity Implementation Report Action Requested: Approve the 2013 Minnesota Pay Equity Implementation Report Information / Background: State law requires that all units of local government submit a Pay Equity Implementation Report to the state every three years. The report for the City of Edina must be filed for 2013. Every city must use a job evaluation system to determine the comparable worth value of the work performed by each class of its employees, and ensure that female- dominated jobs are not systematically paid less than male- dominated jobs of comparable worth. In 2012, the City retained TruSight to conduct a job classification study. Human Resources has worked with TruSight to compile and submit the required information. The tests ran by TruSight indicate the City is in compliance. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Compliance Report Jurisdiction: Edina Report Year: 2013 4801 West 50th Street Case: 1 - 2013 DATA (Submitted) Edina MN 55424 -1330 Contact: Lisa Schaefer Phone: (952) 826 -0404 E -Mail: Ichaefer@EdinaMN.gov The statistical analysis, salary range and exceptional service pay test results are shown below. Part I is general information from your pay equity report data. Parts II, III and IV give you the test results. For more detail on each test, refer to the Guide to Pay Equity Compliance and Computer Reports. I. GENERAL JOB CLASS INFORMATION II. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST A. Underpayment Ratio = 109.59 Male Male Female Balanced All Job a. # At or above Predicted Pay 46 Classes Classes Classes Classes # Job Classes 83 59 6 148 # Employees 224 80 29 333 Avg. Max Monthly Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 302 Pay per employee 6,024.25 5,390.20 5,649.27 II. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST A. Underpayment Ratio = 109.59 Male Female Classes Classes a. # At or above Predicted Pay 46 35 b. # Below Predicted Pay 37 24 c. TOTAL 83 59 d. % Below Predicted Pay 44.58 40.68 (b divided by c = d) *(Result is % of male classes below predicted pay divided by % of female classes below predicted pay.) B. T -test Results Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 302 Value of T = -4.082 a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs = $23 b. Avg. dill. in pay from predicted pay for female jobs = $247 III. SALARY RANGE TEST = 95.87 (Result is A divided by B) A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs = 5.27 B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs = 5.50 IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST = 0.00 (Result is B divided by A) A. % of male classes receiving ESP 8.43 B. % of female classes receiving ESP 1.69 *(If 20% or less, test result will be 0.00) Part A: Jurisdiction Identification Jurisdiction: Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina Contact: Lisa Schaefer Pay Equity Implementation Report 1/31/2013 MN 55424 -1330 Phone: (952) 826 -0404 Part B: Official Verification 1. The job evaluation system used measured skill, effort responsibility and working conditions and the same system was used for all classes of employees. The system used was: Consultant's System Description: MRA Trusight (Formerly called Employers Association 2. Health Insurance benefits for male and female classes of comparable value have been evaluated and: There is no difference and female classes are not at a disadvantage. Part C: Total Payroll $25,928,169.19 is the annual payroll for the calendar year just ended December 31. Jurisdiction Type: City E -Mail: Ichaefer@EdinaMN.gov 3. An official notice has been posted at: Official Bulletin Boards (prominent location) informing employees that the Pay Equity Implementation Report has been filed and is available to employees upon request. A copy of -the notice has been sent to each exclusive representative, if any, and also to the public library. The report was approved by: City Council (pending for 2/5/2013 resolution) (governing body) Jim Hovland (chief elected official) Mayor (title) Q Checking this box indicates the following: signature of chief elected official approval by governing body all information is complete and accurate, and - all employees over which the jurisdiction has final budgetary authority are included Date Submitted: 1 01/31/2013 J To: Mayor and City Council From: Kris Aaker Assistant City Planner Date: February 5, 2013 ,w9A,r o �'^�x�ox++T/ 1880 Agenda Item #: VI. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Public Hearing for Variance appeal, 13- 12 -12, 5801 Crescent Terrace, Applicant: Nicole Sunberg, Appellant: Kevin Gilligan. Action Requested: Continue the Public Hearing to the February 19, 2013, meeting of the Edina City Council. Please see attached request by the applicant and the appellant. The applicant is requesting the continuance in an effort to respond to nearby neighbors with a resolution to the concerns they expressed. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 N Kris Aaker From: Nate Wissink <nate @elevation homes. com> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:28 PM To: Kris Aaker Subject: 5801 Crescent Terrace Continuance Kris, On behalf of my client Nicole Sunberg, we request that the appeal to the front yard setback variance be continued from the February 5th City Council meeting until the February 191h City Council meeting. We are requesting the continuance in an effort to respond to the nearby neighbors with a resolution to the concerns they expressed. Please let me know me know if this request will be implemented. Thanks. Nate Wissink I Project Director I Streeter & Associates, Inc. I Direct 952.346.2488 P Kris Aaker gym: Sarah M. Zach <szach @lindquist.com> ,ent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:07 AM To: Kris Aaker Cc: Cary Teague; Marcus Mollison; Deb Mangen; Scott Neal; Nate Wissink (nate @elevationhomes.com) Subject: RE: Consent to Defer 5801 Crescent Terrace Variance Appeal Hearing to 2/19/13 Thank you, Kris. L I n 0 0 U l S T t V E N N U M Sarah M. Zach I Associate, Real Estate 1 612.371.6239 1 szach @lindguist.com I Biography Lindquist & Vennum LLP 1 4200 IDS Center, 80 S 8`h Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Legal Administrative Assistant: Marilyn Olson 1 612.752.1074 1 molson(@Iindguist.com From: Kris Aaker f_mailto:KAakerCa)EdinaMN.gov1 Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 9:52 AM To: Sarah M. Zach Cc: Cary Teague; Marcus Mollison; Deb Mangen; Scott Neal; Nate Wissink (nate (aelevationhomes.com) Subject: RE: Consent to Defer 5801 Crescent Terrace Variance Appeal Hearing to 2/19/13 near Sarah, Thank you for your e -mail. I am in receipt of this consent. The consent herein and the change of the hearing date to the February 19, 2013, Edina City Council Meeting will in no way affect the rights of or operate as a waiver of any appeal rights by the appealing party. Sincerely, Kris Aaker Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Q4_ (M 1 952-826-04611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 KAaker(c?EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning .; t '/ ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Sarah M. Zach Imailto:szach0)lindquist.com1 Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 9:36 AM To: Kris Aaker Cc: Cary Teague; Marcus Mollison Subject: Consent to Defer 5801 Crescent Terrace Variance Appeal Hearing to 2/19/13 Kris, Thank you again for your call this morning. ,n behalf of appealing party Kevin Gilligan, we consent to the deferral, from February 5, 2013 to February 19, 2013, of the Edina City Council's hearing of the appeal of the Edina Planning Commission's approval of the 5801 Crescent Terrace variance. 1 Please confirm in writing by. responding to this email: (1) your receipt of this consent; and (2) that the consent herein and the change of the hearing date will in no way affect the rights of, or operate as a waiver of any appeal rights, by the appealing party. Please contact me with any questions. Thank you, Sarah LIIVDQUIST L I N 0 d U I S T* V E N N U M Sarah M. Zach I Associate, Real Estate 1 612.371.6239 1 szach@lindquist.com I Biography Lindquist & Vennum LLP 1 4200 IDS Center, 80 S 8th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Legal Administrative Assistant: Marilyn Olson 1 612.752.1074 1 molson@lindguist.com NOTICES IRS Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, except to the extent expressly provided to the contrary, any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This e -mail message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be subject to attorney- client privilege or work - product protection, and should not be read or distributed by anyone other than an intended recipient. If you received this by mistake, please notify us by replying to the message, and then delete it. NOTICES IRS Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, except to the extent expressly provided to the contrary, any federal tax advice . contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This e -mail message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be subject to attorney- client privilege or work - product protection, and should not be read or distributed by anyone other than an intended recipient. If you received this by mistake, please notify us by replying to the message, and then delete it. F) Kris Aaker rom: Nate Wissink <nate @elevation homes.com> Sent: Monday; January 28, 2013 1:13 PM To: Kris Aaker Subject: Extension Kris, Just letting you. know that we would like to extend our hearing date two more weeks for. 5801 Crescent Terrace. Please confirm this is ok to do. Thanks. Nate WissinkI Project Directory Streeter & Associates, Inc. and Elevation Homes Direct 952.346.2488 Fax 952.449.4987 1 email:.nate @elevationhomes.com I www @elevationhomes.com :P©RT / R iCOM�M L�NDATIOON O�l� f11� ,eaa To: MAYOR AND. COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.A From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion . X❑ Date: February 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Sketch Plan Review, 4412 Morningside. Road and 4232 Oakdale Avenue Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Alternatives for the subdivision of this property. Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider three sketch plan alternatives to redevelop six existing residential lots located in the Morningside neighborhood, on the St. Louis Park/Edina boundary. (See property location on pages A I —A5 of the Planning Commission staff report dated December 12, 201.2.) The applicant originally submitted a subdivision application to divide the property into eight lots with a cul -de -sac off Morningside Road to provide access to.six of the new lots. (See page A 17 of the Planning Commission staff report dated December 12, 2012.) The request required three variances. The Planning Commission considered that proposal at their December 12th regular meeting, and recommended that the applicant consider alternative ways to develop the property, and come back to the Planning Commission and City Council with some sketch alternatives. On January 23rd, 2013, the applicant presented three alternatives to the Planning Commission. (See the attached alternatives and minutes from the January 23, 2013 meeting, which include the Planning Commission Comments.) The alternatives include: Option A — A 10 -lot subdivision (19 lot variances required - the applicant would also seek setback variances) Option B - A I 0 -lot subdivision (21 lot variances required — the applicant would also seek setback variances) Modified Original. - An 8 -lot subdivision (3 lot variances required) The applicant has demonstrated that the property could be subdivided with 8 -lots and no variances, if a through street is constructed. (See attached.) The cul -de -sac is proposed to save mature trees and not disturb a steep. slope area on the site. ... City. of Edina 4801 W. 50t' St' • Edina, MN 55424 Planning Commission Consideration: On January 23, 2013, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. See the detail of the Planning Commission comments in the attached minutes. ATTACHMENTS: • Applicant PowerPoint from the January 23, 2013 Planning Commission Meeting (including the subdivision alternatives and conforming plat. • Minutes from the January 23, 2013 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 12, 2012 (Original Request) • Planning Commission Memo, January 23, 2013 (Sketch Alternatives) • Letter from area resident W ^ ^ w m CM n Sidell's are 50 year residents of Morningside Create a legacy for our n father (Franklin DuBois Sidell) Character of Morningside c 40TH ST w - z e0i _ z 1 2 J - re ber Id Park z 42NDST W 1 _ i Ve 0 4RACIfl NINGSIDF RD GLENDALE TE BRANSON IT -� ' ownQaie 43 in�sr w Park o �tH SI N4 G o W JO - Z _45TH ST O t SUNNYSME RD - Oldest section of Edina - 633 houses - 65 rebuilt or heavily remodeled in the last few years ( >10 %) - More than 35% have garages in the front. - 1/3 of the community does not have sidewalks - More than 35% of the lots are larger than 50' - Current property is unique - 7,000 sq. ft. house on a 3 acre lot - Which part do we copy? Very eclectic. No two houses are the same. It's about community not house style or lot size. I I I I y7--)l UMH ��M m» I I' ^D u Iur IJ I I yl� ' a G A Z4Sx4 L--- - --- - -- I � �i I 7 I N M o a A 444x4 d I L---- - - - - -- _-- ---- -- ®1- -- M 0 D --- - - - --- - - -- I � D Dili me ------ - - - - -- D Z. Y o c A 044x4 , r— ------- - - -- ml$ -I�- A m4xi I � r o L -- �- - -- o A L44'L4 , iT'---- - - - - -- 4 4 s - -- - - -- $aga��g ' -- — — — — — — — n i Azz4x4 °— L---- a - - - - -- F�'� umsun �pHRR I NF ��A 99D'94 � E, J . $11191 19 1333ats 13ttn °• �° ,onn M Ls z/4 za 0 ���gq4�r3� � 3 . i � v � � �• I CONFORMING CONCEPT PLAN 1 Terra o S ACRESDUBOIS ^' MINA. MN Conforming Concept 1 Features - 8lots - 2 additional park service fees - Through street connecting Littel with Morningside Rd No variances are necessary Issues - Many neighbors opposed to this concept - Completely changes the character of lower Oakdale Eliminates most of the trees - Creates the need for excessive grading and fill Creates the need for large retaining walls More traffic - Does not maintain the uniqueness and serenity of the original property I I I I I I I JL VOL[ 30ISDNINNON PT VIU03 r------ - -MlYd SIflO'1 '15 c I 'fk I F- 0 I fi I ar I fi ee 0 I - -- W_ J_ - Zs, u � > m ---------------- e.. ac f} .yaw. -------- - - - ------ -------- r— g I a LI ----------- R � / 8 E i! i33rus 13un d1111 i- ° „� PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN °� FI Terra w° s (ORIGINAL REVISED OPTION) M.:6�.. Z. °m ACRES DUBOIS a EDINA. MN mnm w:ru ev an+ Modified Original Proposal Features -. Narrowed the street to a 40' row with a 24' pavement. Suggest parking be allowed on only one side. Increased the out lot on the east side to 18' - Added a pervious center to the cul -de -sac bulb. Could be grass pavers? - Agreed to move the driveway for 4408 to the new road. - Advantages No 50' lots 88' from the east boundary to the houses in lots 1,2 &3 Lower housing density Only requires three minor variances for lot depths Greatest tree savings Less traffic Maintains the serenity of the original property 11 U 1 F 11 n1 h7i u i� 11 ►\ , I I I I , 7, I I I I , I c° I A WOtl 3015`JNINil01Y YES r- ------ - - - - u -- - -- wna aly� m y aw°-rv. m i m e - - - - -- I -- - - - - -- - -L - -- �. fi d a fi 0 y r� ti R E:� ------------ w" s � I ---------------- L I I 64 C Vms m °c am= m fifi i33aLS i3un - - -- d-Ilp oA 6 a `N4 SKETCH PLAN •A• IRE', II! Terra \ N ACRES DUB IS EDINA. NN Sketch Plan A Features - Creates 6 smaller lots ( <751) similar to the 50' lots of the surrounding area. - 40' ROW 24' paved surface road. Road moved one lot over from 4408. Houses on lots 1,2823 load off of Morningside Rd similar to the majority of the house on this street. - Lot 1 may save some trees (lots 2 &3 will lose some) Pervious center added to the cul -de -sac bulb Issues Neighborhood uproar about houses being built on 50' lots. - The Family will not agree to be held to different building regulations than the rest of the community. Higher density - Estimate net loss of trees at 14 - More park usage fees - We will only pay for two - 26 Variances needed - The Family will need a legal statement from the City guaranteeing that the variances will be available when the houses are built. I F 11 F71 i 0 w I - I EDI - -- H - - - -- a, I w° I Ig e, I -- - - -, re I --- - - - - -- I - i ----- - - --`— --------------��---- 8 °uP I L—JJ �PB� am 4.4, U I I I I I I I I I I I m C n av0a 0 r&NE.,F4, 8 --- - - - - -- s P ."tkm m m � y� o ac m g y a0 � imrus gun O I ° 3 • i sn-rcH PLAN OPTION °B° ACRES DUBOIS � r- a � I . I I Terra Sketch Plan B Features - Creates 6 smaller lots ( <751) similar to the 50' lots of the surrounding area. - 40' ROW 24' paved surface road. Road is next to 4408 with a 15' out lot. House on lot 1 is about 60' from the east boundary. - Houses on lots 1,2 &3 load off of Morningside Rd similar to the majority of the house on this street. - Pervious center added to the cul -de -sac bulb Issues Neighborhood uproar about houses being built on 50' lots. The Family will not agree to be held to different building regulations than the rest of the community. Higher density Estimate net loss of trees at 15 More park usage fees - We will only pay for two - 26 Variances needed The Family will need a legal statement from the City guaranteeing that the variances will be available when the houses are built. `• rlal ` r � A %Q4 '�^ l�_ . ,7 o -Ir'�- 144-14 '' A 19 POO � r- a � I . I I Terra Sketch Plan B Features - Creates 6 smaller lots ( <751) similar to the 50' lots of the surrounding area. - 40' ROW 24' paved surface road. Road is next to 4408 with a 15' out lot. House on lot 1 is about 60' from the east boundary. - Houses on lots 1,2 &3 load off of Morningside Rd similar to the majority of the house on this street. - Pervious center added to the cul -de -sac bulb Issues Neighborhood uproar about houses being built on 50' lots. The Family will not agree to be held to different building regulations than the rest of the community. Higher density Estimate net loss of trees at 15 More park usage fees - We will only pay for two - 26 Variances needed The Family will need a legal statement from the City guaranteeing that the variances will be available when the houses are built. A. Lot Division. 5700 and 5712 Grove Street r Planner Teague informedthe Commission that Wayne the existing lot line that divides the two properties at 57, purpose of the request is to shift the side lot line five feE adequate area to build a second stall to the existinggai is an existing NSP easement, with`overhead wires "Ahat any garage would constructed. / lund is "requesting to shift rid 5712 Grove Street. The the east to provide at 5712 Grove Street. There a?have to be shifted before Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Coi Division of 5700 and 5712 Grove Street. App: val is subject to the 1. 2. 3 The proposed lot line adjiistri' The purpose of the lot line ad garage. The resulting los.zwould exce Approval is also s Commissioner Forrest findings and subject ti motion. All voted aye; ' oes not ont is to a new lot. approve the Lot wing findings: area to expand the existing :i k... .:-requirement. ply with all minimum zoning ordinance or . the existin side lot line would have to be the overhead power lines would "have to be re issuance of a building permit for, the garage fived to recommend lot division approval based on staff tall conditions. Commissioner Potts seconded the otion carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS a. Sketch Plan Review — Sidell. 4412 Morningside Road and 4532 Oakdale Avenue, Edina, MN Page 1 of 6 Planner Presentation Planner Teague told the Commission based on the direction of the Planning Commission at its December 12, 2012 meeting, the applicant, Peter Knaeble, on behalf of Frank Sidell, has created -three (3) subdivision alternatives for the property located in between Littel Street and Morningside Road. Teague explained that one option is a "revised" original plan. The other two are variations. Teague reminded the Commission there is also a "conforming" plan that depicts a through street; however, the applicants hay e;indicated they do not believe that option is best for the site and neighborhood::;,''` Chair Grabiel explained the Sidells have elected to` "V' nt4a Sketch Plan Review with differing options. The Sketch Plan Review.allows the applicant to obtain feedback from the Commission before they.pFoceed with a formal application. Applicant Presentation Frank Sidell addressed the Com is Sidell explained that their intent wifi ,.ilo DuBois Sidell and create a legacyx property 50 years ago, adding his f; especially for growing families. Sid although many talk about h'd `char, that Morningside is'Edina.; Continuing, Sidell saidAtfeir i ensure thaflts uniqueness, s that the.chOaafer o Morni'nc comrrtunity not house stye o Mornrn"gs�I& eighborh`ood • Mornin10j" de is the olio • Over 65` __: shave few years. • More than 35W f the • 1/3 of this Comm ' ity • More than 35% of the n and it 'Oducecl `tiffs siblings T65:�:Ond Phil. is proposal istto tionor their father; Franklin 61[:explained'his father purchased this :r liked larger lots',Wth trees and grass sked tti :Cotnmission,to remember that r"" of Morrii side it sfio�ald be remembered is to redevelop this property themselves to arYk,,, IFFY.. erved.. With'ahe aid of graphics Sidell explained is veiry eclectic, ?`adding this proposal is about ;ize. Sidel toted the following about the of Edina with 633 houses. n rebuilt or heavily remodeled ( >10 %) in the last Homes have garages in the front. Joes not have sidewalks. lots are larger than 50 -feet • The current property is unique — a 7,000 square foot house on a 3 acre lot — which part do we copy? Sidell referred the Commission to four redevelopment concepts as follows: Page 2 of 6 Conforming Concept: • 8 lots • Through street connecting Little with Morningside Road • No Variances Sidell said in his opinion this concept would change the character of the area and remove too many existing trees and vegetation. Modified Original Concept: • Street was narrowed to a 40 -foot right of way;_(R,O -.` ) with 24 -feet of pavement. r ` • Increased out lot on east side to 18- feet,; , • Added a pervious center to cul- de- sac!j�,,'' • Agreed to move the driveway for 44;08 to the new road. Sidell said this is the concept they prefer. notedrthat in speakrng,with members of the Commission that: he. really likes t 4 e, idea `of "Living Streets ". He also pointed out this concept has.no 50 -foot lots and <o�nly requires three minor variances. Continuing, Sidell said this'pr- 1, has lie. greatest tree savings, less traffic and maintains the serenity�of the'Qriginal prop�rty. Concluding, Sidell said he believes larger lots allow grea #er flexibility in house paacement. Sketch Plan "A ": • Creates 6 smal • . - +U =4001 Kuvv;yana , • Road moved 16ie 1 • Lots_,1., 2, and 3 loa • Tree loss of at mini • 26 variances requir Pervious center ads the 50=;foot side lots in the surrounding ide Road 14 the cul -de =sac bulb. Sidells said in his opini6n =50 =f6ot wide lots do not provide enough flexibility for house placement. He added if this concept is favored that the family would need a legal statement from the City guaranteeing that the variances will be available when the houses are built. Sketch Plan "B ": • Creates 6 small lots similar to the 50 -foot wide lots in the surrounding area • 40 -foot ROW and 24 -foot paved surface road. • Road is not next to 4408 with a 15 -foot out lot. Page 3 of 6 • Lots 1, 2, and 3, continue to load off of Morningside Road • Pervious center added to the cul -de -sac bulb. Sidell stated that the property owners at 4408 do not favor this concept they prefer a road, not house adjacent to them. Sidell pointed out that both concepts "A" and "B" create smaller lots noting that some Edina residents have expressed opposition to redevelopment on 50 -foot wide lots and that redevelopment of 50- foot lots is a "hot- topic" in Edina. Sidell stated his family doesn't want to be held to different building regulations than the rest of the community. Continuing, Sidell said he is very favorable to the smaller paved surface road--of 24 -feet, adding he also supports the18 -foot paved surface that was also suggested. Sidell reiterated � he likes the concept of "living streets "; however, he ish M-6re how the Edina Fire Department feels about it. He added in all the scenandia'., sir goal is to create permeable centers in the cul -de -sac to accommodate wateand unless the Fire Department gets on board with a road narrd er-than24 -feet th,a.t road couldn't be developed. Concluding Sidell said they w6bld = Commissioner Staunton commended the Sidells for all their work on this proposal acknowledging they could have turned the site over to a developer for redevelopment but instead are proceeding with this as a family. Staunton said in his opinion he prefers a variable lot size concept. He added the two smaller lot concepts better reflect the character found in Morningside. Staunton however stated that he is not sure how he feels about houses fronting Morningside Road, adding he knows it mirrors the "other side of the street ", reiterating he's still not sure how he feels about it. Continuing, Staunton said he agrees the cul -de -sac concept is best adding the narrower paved surface and tfie;treatment of the cul- de -sac bulb is interesting and good for the site. CondAb l ng, Staunton said one issue that will be in the forefront during red eveloprnenf"isconstruction management. Mr. Sidell said that his family has thought A"Ib, 'about the construction phase and r,r_4M its management. Sidell said one option thdeytonsidered would be'` #o:use one of the lots as a staging area. Commissioner Platteter thanked`the Sidells for theW"Wo —fk on this project adding their property is a huge part of the" Morn'ih' gside neighborhood. Platteter said he is not sure he likes the additional lots 'on; 0h ,Olternative sketch plans; however, he supports houses facing Morningside Road; r6if� rating he is�unsure additional lots are the way to go. Concluding, Platteter suggested taking two lots out and rotating two at the froµit onto Morningside`Rod _He 6166,," reiterated the importance of tree preservations tr,> Commissioner Potts said Sidejl vvas correct in saying this area of Edina is eclectic. Potts a(so agreed that he would'be sorry to see the property developed with the throuan street concep Concluding Potts said he does favor the smaller lot Comm issioiierS.chroeder said;with re'g`ard to sketch plan concepts A & B that in his opinion therlots. fronti ingside Road would appear disconnected from e.:... the rest of this deve opment.Schroeder said that whatever is decided this development should bede� eloped as its own thing". Schroeder added in his opinion this develop meri�t;sfiouI become its own unique and different "neighborhood ", part of tfe IVlorningside area of Edina. Continuing, Schroeder said the "new" street should be developed as a dynamic living experience. He suggested thinking of the cul -de -sac in a different way; possibility shifting it slightly and play with the geometry of the street creating a "living" fluid street. Schroeder said he's not concerned with lot size; however, wants this street and these houses to become a unique dynamic part of Edina. Concluding, Schroeder said he wants to see a great street developed. Page 5 of 6 Commissioner Forrest said she was opposed to the through street adding she is also hesitant on supporting the concept of fronting homes on Morningside Road. She said these houses would be isolated from the rest of the development. Continuing, Forrest agreed with Schroeder's suggestion of "playing" with the street. Concluding, Forrest said she would like the Sidells to keep their high redevelopment standards and work closely with developer(s), concluding her preference is the modified original concept. Chair Grabiel stated he also supports the modified original concept, adding he agrees with Commissioner Schroeder that this development will be its own micro - neighborhood. Commissioner Platteter said he doesn't want this neighborhood to become exclusive adding he continues to believe homes should be fronted on Morningside Road as laid out in Sketch Plan option A & B. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged that the cul -de -sac in itself can give the appearance of "shutting" out others; however, if care is taken with the corner house creating a welcoming presence any perceived isolation could be overcome. Commissioner Fischer said he supports Sketch Plan concept "A ". Fischer said in his opinion it's not about the number of lots it's about the street itself. Fischer said whichever concept is ultimately chosen what he wants to see is the creation of a special place and special street. Concluding Fischer suggested that the applicant speak more with the Fire Department to see if they would "come on board" supporting a less wide street (18- feet). Planner Teague informed the Commission that while the Fire Department has expressed reservation about a road narrower than the suggested 24 -foot paved surface, they would be willing to reconsider the paved surface width, if the drive aisle width were 18 -feet and there was an attached level drive -over sidewalk of 6- feet. Emergency vehicle access is paramount. Chair Grabiel thanked the Sidells for their presentation, adding what he takes from this exchange is that whichever concept is chosen that care needs to be taken with tree preservation and that creativity needs to be taken with the cul -de -sac. Page 6 of 6 Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague December 12, 2012 VI.D. Director of Planning File # 2012.014.12a INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Peter Knaeble on behalf of Frank Sidell is proposing to subdivide the Sidell family -owned property located in between Littel: treet and Mor'ningside Road into eight lots. Currently the site consists of six lots. (See property. location on pages Al —A5.) The existing home on the south side of the property and various accessory buildings would be torn down and a cul -de -sac street would be built along the east lot line to serve six of the new home sites. The existing home at 4232 Oakdale would remain and one new lot created on Little Street. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A6 -A31.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1: A subdivision; 2. Lot depth variances from 161 feet to 131 feet for Lot 4; to 140 feet for Lot 6 and to 135 feet for Lot 7. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 9,606 square feet, median lot depth is 161 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. (See attached median calculations on pages A11— A13.) The applicant has developed a plat that would meet all of the minimum lot size requirements; therefore, this site is entitled to develop with eight lots. (See code compliant plat on page A16 & A25.) However, the applicant would rather not develop the site with that plan. There are some steep slopes on this property as well as very mature trees. By developing the site in that configuration with a through street to connect Morningside Road to Littel Street would require extensive tree removal and slop disturbance. Therefore, the applicant is proposing the cul -de -sac configuration to avoid the slope; and is proposing a permanent conservation easement over some of the mature trees to ensure they are protected. (See pages A23 —A24.) Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low - density residential. (See pages A3 —A5.) Existing Site Features The existing site contains two single - family homes and number of accessory buildings. (See pages A4 & Al 5.). The southernmost home and accessory buildings would be removed. Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single- dwelling residential R -1, Single- dwelling district * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them acceptable. (See the specific comments the city engineer on page A50.) Storm water would be directed off the homes and driveways toward the new AA Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 9,606 s.f. 75 feet 161 feet Lot 1 12,512 s.f. 75 feet 161 feet Lot 2 12,111 s.f. 75 feet 161 feet Lot 3 12,113 s.f. 75 feet 161 feet Lot 4 10,342 s.f. 80 feet 131 feet* Lot 5 18,169 s.f. 83 feet 179 feet Lot 6 14,533 s.f. 94 feet 140 feet* Lot 7 23,289 s.f. 122 feet 179 feet Lot 8 12,170 s.f. 90 feet 135 feet* * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them acceptable. (See the specific comments the city engineer on page A50.) Storm water would be directed off the homes and driveways toward the new AA cul -de -sac. The cul -de -sac would then drain to the north into a catch basin that would direct drainage by pipe to a ponding that would be located on proposed Lot 8. Overflow from this pond would drain primarily to the west into St. Louis Park and to a lesser amount to Littel Street and the City -owned parcel to the east. (See grading plan on page A18.) As the City's regulatory authority on the drainage plans, they shall be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The grading plan demonstrates encroachment on the City -owned property adjacent to Lot 7. Use of this property will require compensation to the City of Edina, and a restoration plan subject to review and approval by the City Council. The detailed grading plans for each new home would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. Tree Preservation /Street Construction — Through Street vs. Cul -De -Sac The applicant considered developing the site with a through street that would connect Morningside to Littel Street. (See page A16 & A25.) This is the configuration of eight lots that meet all minimum City Code requirements; therefore, the applicant is entitled to a subdivision of this property into eight lots. As mentioned, this site contains steep slopes along the west and north side of the site, and contains many mature trees. The Code compliant plat would require a significant amount of grading to make the slopes work to connect the streets and the majority of the mature trees would be removed. By developing this site with a cul -de -sac, grading would be significantly reduced, and mature trees could be saved. To ensure that the trees be permanently preserved, the applicant is proposing a conservation easement over the slope and mature trees. (See conservation easement on pages A23 —A24.) A total of 82 trees would be protected within the easement area. The through street configuration would only save 42 trees on the site'. (See page A25.) The City would not be in position to require a conservation easement over the trees in a code compliant plat. As demonstrated on page A31, there are several cul -de -sacs in area. There are eight shown to the west in St. Louis Park, and six shown to the south in the City of Edina; the closest cul -de -sac is just over 800 feet to the south On Oakdale Avenue; therefore a cul -de -sac would not be completely out of character in this area. M Traffic /Safety Concern was raised in regard to traffic safety in the area with the increase of six new single - family homes in the area; therefore, WSB was asked to do a traffic study to determine impacts. As demonstrated in the attached report, the level of service on the existing streets would not change as a result of the proposal. (See pages A41 A49.) There would be sufficient sight lines for traffic exiting or entering the proposed new street intersection on Morningside Road. A stop sign is recommended for the new street approaching Morningside Road and providing a clear sight line from the intersection. (See page A46.) As proposed the existing driveway for the adjacent home at 4408 Morningside Road would be located only 22 feet from the new intersection, therefore, it is recommended that a new driveway be configured to gain access off the new street. If constructed to lead straight in to the existing garage at 4408, the driveway would be located over 50 feet from the intersection. This shall be made a condition of approval. The proposed new street right -of -way would also be located 15 feet from the adjacent home at 4408 Morningside Road. A 15 -foot side street setback is required by City Code. An 8.7 foot wide Outlot is proposed on the east side of the proposed right -of way, which would be planted with a row of evergreen trees to minimum impact to the home. The applicant is proposing to deed this Outlot to the adjacent property. (4408 Morningside Road.) This shall be made a condition of any approval. Previous Vacation of Right -of -Way (West side of the Sidell Property) As demonstrated on Exhibit A32, there was a 20 -foot wide strip of right -of- way along the west side of the Sidell property. Another 20 -foot wide strip of right -of -way had existed in St. Louis Park as well. Both of these right -of -ways have been vacated. Most recently, the City of St. Louis Park vacated its 20- foot easement. Many years ago, believed to be in the 1950's, the City of Edina vacated the 20 -foot right -of -way on the Sidell property. (See page A32, A36 & A37.) When this area was originally platted, Natchez Avenue was to continue to the north to Littel, which was to extend to the west into St. Louis Park. However, over time this right -of -way has been vacated both in Edina and St. Louis Park, including the extension of Littel to the west. Given the steep slopes in this area it was determined that the road would not be constructed in that location. There would still be adequate room to construct the cul -de -sac along the west property line, even with the vacation of right -of -way that has already taken place. Using a west side street configuration, 68 trees would be preserved 4 compared to 82 in the east side street configuration. Also; a smaller amount of steep slope would be preserved with a road on the west of the property. Sidewalk The applicant is proposing a sidewalk that would be located within the right- of-way on the west'side of the new street. This would-tie into the existing sidewalk on Morningside Road. (See page A20.) Park Dedication The property exists as six lots originally platted in the Crocker & Crowell's First Addition plat. Therefore, park dedication has already been paid for six lots. Edina City Code requires a park dedication fee of.$5,000 for each additional lot created. Therefore a park dedication fee of $10;000 would be required. Primary Issues • Are the findings fora variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met with this proposal. f Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted Unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the.proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical. difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is due to the steep slopes and mature trees on the site. By the shape of. the lots and building a cul -de -sac, an additional 40 mature trees would be saved and permanently protected by a conservation easement; a total of 82 within the easement. A majority of the severe slopes would also be maintained. (See. page A24.) The result of the cul -de -sac design is the need for three lot depth variances; Lot 4, 6 and 7. 5 The variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood and for the subdivision. It does not create any additional lots. The Code compliant Plat results in eight lots, as does the proposed subdivision. To deny the variances would not prevent the property from developing with eight lots. Denial of the variances would however, result in the significant disturbance of the slopes and the removal of all but 40 mature trees on the site. (See page A25.) b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? The circumstances of a large, mostly vacant, parcel with mature trees and steep slopes are unique to this property. There are no other parcels of this size and shape in the City of Edina. While the family has held these properties for many years, they did not plant the vast majority of the trees and did not create the steep slopes. C) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. There are many lots in the area that have lot depths that do not meet the median of 161 feet. There are 26 lots within 500 feet that do not have a lot depth of greater than 131 feet, which is the shallowest of the lots in the subdivision. (See pages Al 1 —A13.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed eight lot subdivision of the Sidell property and the lot depth variances from 161 feet to 131 feet for Lot 4; to 140 feet for Lot 6; and to 135 feet for Lot 7. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The applicant has submitted a subdivision of the property that would meet all minimum zoning district requirements with eight lots and new through street that would connect Morningside Road and Littel Street. 2. Rather than develop the site per all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements, the applicant has submitted a proposed subdivision of the property with a cul -de -sac, which requires lot depth variances for Lots 4, 6 and 7. 3. The proposed subdivision with the three lot depth variances would preserve the steep slopes on the site, and permanently preserves 82 mature trees by placing them in a conservation easement. Z 4. The proposed subdivision still has eight lots. 5. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for subdivision. 6. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing steep slopes and mature trees on the property: b. The requested. variances are reasonable, in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lots larger in sizel than the median, and there are 26 lots within:500 feet of the property that do not have lot depths greater than 131 feet, which is the shallowest of the three lots that require lot depth variances. c. The variance request is reasonable, as subdivision still contains eight lots, which would be allowed with the: Code compliant subdivision; however, it permanently protects steep slopes and 82 mature trees. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant could still subdivide the property into eight lots, however the steep slopes would be disturbed an additional 42 mature trees would be removed. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to release of the final plat, the following items most be submitted: a. Submit:evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require: revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. Enter into a Developers Agreement with the City. The Developers Agreement shall include the requirement for construction of the sidewalk as proposed. C.. Pay the park dedication fee of $10,000 d. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance 7 with the overall grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. e. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated December 7, 2013. A construction management plan will be required for the overall development of the site, and for each individual home construction. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. h. Establishment of a permanent tree preservation easement as demonstrated on the grading and tree preservation plan. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road. The applicant must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street, and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The configuration shall be subject to approval of the director of engineering. k. A stop sign is required to be installed on the new street approaching Morningside Road. Clear sight lines shall be maintained from the intersection. Use of Lot 7 for the overall grading of the development will require compensation to the City of Edina. A restoration plan shall be submitted by the applicant subject to review and approval by the City Council. Deadline for a City Decision: March 5, 2013 8 i`�' .� 1,1,7- City of Edina 4235 4/212 4233 42344214 .. 776 4237 4138 4�1-7 g270 -�8 y 4241 4240 4241 4371 wr ¢ -� _ x117 x110 411._ 4177 /210 1221 4117 I1f9 d1N - 4119 Legend Surrounding House Number Vbels 4771 �j 5245 1718 Qf rr 7227 4228 _ c_ C;�1221 4226 4117 - 4214. 1U House Number Labels 4318 4822 4816 4146 4249 Q10 417 7231 42. 771 1271 - i22Jj 4128 4217 4211 Street Labels V 1 0215 4230 41157 411< 176117 Li its V City Limits Building Footprints 4233 42 4232 4251 4415 4811 480\1) 4127 4409 6272 4216 Op. space d 0171 1119 l ...% Creeks Lake Names -- 427f 42:;0 1171 !!!!7373 4257 S/xl' �l`5542 24 -- \\ 4 4157/2 1174; �j 4177 — u S2'M a23J 4t'HD Lakes El Parks 426 43eo \ IJ 4231 1773 O 4130 l27a 4234D Parcels O 420 IM1 426141 ' C-4237 a277 4169 1264 426542 2; ¢ 4178 2 4279 �-r I � S 4279 f1N L1427d 4171 426942 4270 :240 ILJI 41�f 4217 4277 41 14 '2 2 64243 4241 64143 1241 1174 4244 4245 D ❑ 424< 4240 L- 1Cj24T 429142 41;, 45" 1500 4412 03 4N6 4117 47107 41463 4246 4708 L� 4108 428712 42`7 __ 4400„ J75a� �J 1118 x4249 �.LA ! O"j LJ .w� AOGNM'G`- 'bl'.SU 4305 4305 4501 +1 N/ 7 Nfr j 1 �J N W� 7 0J Ij j' 4109 4101 Y315 U � 4 AID511U7 � 1 '4115 <71 f 4309 470>:4305 0701 4 ?15 4213 4111 4316 4J1S 4306 4340 ' 44014717 Q ❑ LJ 4306 72. 4312 1 CJ7 4323 pVro 4707 ❑ 432029 1709 ❑ Q❑ 4106 (n-147e14JOOi T11-1f L.I 1170 4329 �y�"13 4 77/3 4333 ,", 421144jj21�'J 42104208/M6142014100 f3f?l7/01308 U NP ILq I ( 4217 1 I NOB iJ0'14I0144024iUU 431! u '14 I 4728 3`1 ��(q 477-11 J�4f0� UN 4335 j' ✓8� \ O �-+'� erwrrSaf sT II"" 4377 �137 I ' ` r 41I215. 11342 rl 0 r � Oe7 t,,, 3 w �}1113" 434 4307- 434 Of14J097 1 0 4330 43417 j 4344 44111 (f 4348 " 472! 4]71 433 ° /409 4407 4405 4403 4401 4317 \ \ \�\ 4340 475 ^ \ ;fu ifao 4116 Q 7773 <J56 4/70 'J111U 4759 4346 1773 7 4367. 4730 Q 0.377 4760 '� 4160 4763 1� �t'� C7N 7175 4350 ll/436i� 4377 0 1/ 1767 4354 4768 (� 4188 4163 4131 V 1206 4100 1 Y1 4701 1108 µ5 4179 t (�437i 4360 4379 477. 0-1 ` 1341 \ t,J `r"l .4I1 `41271 V t \ ` 411} IStl6 4110 U 1 .s.kua.c� -q. ;ci �ocucs: us 4701 4211 N55 N70 A I ~„ Y PID: 0702824420094 'A 4412 Morningside Rd Edina, MN 55416 r�Cli1 twTt'� .� 1,1,7- 3 City of Edina 4,713 477; yl a 412f - - -0- Legend � House Number Labels Labels a %t0, 4118 3271 4171 ❑ 321)7 4228 House Number Labels Street Name Labels IJlTB 57 F'�—I r '4115 yL— 4170 City Limits Building Footprints 1757 1272 JI 4227 4232 �.J Creeks � Lake Names 4253 4403 Open Space 9 4111 - -- -- J�JIf�--'-'791� 4271 J � Lakss El Parks O Parcels 4255 255 21 J` 415 1297 4174 0 4277 _. 4276 e `zss�11L 4277 4`481 4281/276 H i JIM 4263 4165 N 24 u 4238 z j 4279 _ 4269 1269 r-� 42111 L.� 4241 I 1 1247 ®� 4277 427 4 � II IF— 1244 C1215 ❑ 424J� 4 1181 421 7412 4708 <236 1147 tJfO 42ut6 4187 z8 a4oa 4750 770911 I I 4119 etaev GSIDERD L 4117 /415 4617 4171 4703 p 4179 ;405 <417 In L I 1717 7775 J 1711 7709 u ai O7 Wa.�.a7.mJS•LnofOalLluYiletl 3ll5 _— _— — ._. - 4,1071 1717 L>_J J H C ."•. PID: 0702824420094 4412 Morningside Rd,x?� a t. Edina, MN 55416 �!� , r,L1 xi FCaR N� t� • IuUH 3 LOGISMap Output Page L� City of Edina 224 r117 ,. 4218 - - IICC- - - Legend ry. Surrounding House Number -� 4711 2 r176� t Qij Labels 4710 4221 , -'\ r_]t `' 4717 f `(4217 '�r778 House Number Labels \ t Street Name Labels ,t •� j •'` City Limits � 1.4+.1 1225 7 ,r;/ Creeks _ r 1757 �12J2 A ^, � ;� � �. t / ' : •' � 1777 Lakcs • v _ 4405 y1 +r � Parcais - 's.r i a F'. 1771 r 2009 Aerial Photo • � 1235 ITS! TI 1774 ax 1x1 1201 j ;i 4177 . 1• w ' C� � �'i�r - �td' 1260 4210 ITH 1143( ,K ••; 1144 ir. 4281 Ixt 1100 /2K 1 1717 IJ70 - a 47r6a, i - 1112 4287 420 IMD 4750 {1re• 4 +MR= 1157 1/1! 1417 1111 3" 1 4717 Q07 1705 4707 1711 1x0 4707 us ar =�wnuacmr tt::uacnav>I 1105 4103 1101 4404 rw j A �i fitA D •' PID: 0702824420094 pp VI 4412 Morningside Rd Q ti?� \1` - -1;1. L Edina, MN 55416 „by r t7y • ` '4ZTer n: vt..4 �_ nnnl L� City of Edina PID:0702824420094 4412 Morningside Rd Edina, MN 55416 fd� . a =R-I f A © e 0. ZOAJ I tv 6 MAP Legend .! City omits Cr ks Lakes Zoning . AwytYa.,ona.v,rlw�po�ll ■ RDD -s(W.x Dnvbp— Dindr.l ■ uoDa(u�dD�bP.r�la�j . Pco- 1(ft— dc�D—r_.j ■ PCOP {Pbnnad Ceenm®ID inctl ■ KDa(pb"wc —LlD —j ■ PCD- a(vbne.d cam.rm Dmnrl F-1 PID lvtannod lndwfrol Dirirclj POP -1 {Plmned IXfico Oistr'rtj roD- zlwR:nd arKn D:nrG.j . PRD1(P— RsW—, 0—) ■ PRD-2(Pxm R- W -14 D—1 . PROJ{Ptr: Rc.W —1 D—j ■ PRDaiPL—ldRaWamel O= ■ MD -5 jlb,nei RerdanlblDbric:i ■ PSRalPhnnad 4an tar 0iatrkl) O R•11Si,pk O.vtinp Uaaj . R11 aou0b Dwalllnq Unil) RMDjRegc�alMMCy DCrnl OParcels 2009 Aerial Phota a =R-I f A © e 0. ZOAJ I tv 6 MAP Terra Engineering, Inc. 0* Civil Engineering Land Planning • Consulting November 7, 2012 Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 West 50`x' St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: PROJECT NARRATIVE Acres DuBois 4232 Oakdale Ave., Edina 4412 Morningside Rd., Edina TE #12 -109 Dear Cary: At1w(*nT NARRAIIJE N�V 1 � Zp12 \:J 1 Based on input from City staff and neighbors, we have prepared our Preliminary Plans for the Acres DuBois development (Sheets 1 -9, dated 11/5/12) and this Project Narrative for your review and approval. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located at 4232 Oakdale Ave. and 4412 Morningside Rd. in the Morningside neighborhood of Edina. The 3.14 acre site has a home on the south side of the property that will be removed, and a home on the north side of the property that will remain. The owners of the property are longtime Morningside residents (50 years). They have made the decision not to sell to a developer and to stay involved with this project through the approval process in an attempt to keep it as neighborhood friendly as possible. The property is currently zone R -1 Residential and is surrounded by existing homes that are also zoned R -1 Residential. The western boundary of the property abuts the city of St. Louis Park, and is also adjacent to existing homes in St. Louis Park. A6. 6001 Glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 763 - 593 -9325 Terra Engineering, Inc. #*Is* Civil Engineering Land Planning • Consulting The existing homes on the site are currently connected to City sewer and water, and front on City streets that have existing public sanitary sewer and watermains. Per City requirements, we have had a tree survey prepared by a certified forester and located all trees on the property per City zoning standards. We have also hired a wetland consultant to review the site and he has determined that there are no wetlands on the property. We have also hired a soil testing company to provide soil borings and a soil report for the site. The soil report indicates that the site is suitable for a residential development. The site is relatively level on the south part of the property with some steep slope areas in the northern part of the property. The slopes areas over 18% have been identified, per City requirements, on the plans. The northern portion of the site is a low area that is currently landlocked with a ground overflow elevation of approximately 881. Due to the porous /granular y nature of the existing soils, stormwater that is currently directed to this low area is rapidly. _. infiltrated. The land owner estimates that the flood elevation for the July 87 super stormwwas only about 874, or two feet above the bottom elevation. `,, %T \ PROPOSED PROJECT: J As shown in the plans (Sheet 9; Conforming Concept Plan), this site could accommodate an eight lot conforming plat, utilizing a through street connecting Morningside Road and Littel Street. This conforming plat would meet all City zoning and subdivision requirements, including lot size, setbacks, lot depths and lot widths. But this eight lot conforming plat would also require significantly more site grading (including additional grading in the steep slope area) and tree removal. The conforming plat would also increase the site's imperious coverage. Given the additional grading and tree removal requirements, we are proposing a cul -de -sac street option that would also accommodate eight lots. Our development proposal is to subdivide the property into eight single family lots that would be served by a new public cul -de -sac and existing streets. All eight lots would exceed the R -1 Residential Zoning standards for lot size (minimum 9606 sf) and lot width (minimum 75'). Three of the lots will require a variance for the 161.5' minimum lot depth (Lot 4 is 127', Lot 6 is 140', and Lot 7 is 135'). All lots would be large enough to accommodate standard sized one level and two story detached single'family homes. This project would require less grading, less tree removal, and less impervious coverage than the conforming eight lot plat option. The developer of the site will construct the public utilities and streets as shown on the plan. Other than grading for the streets and utility areas, all other tree removal and house pad grading will be done on a custom graded basis to maximize tree savings. Homes will be custom designed to the individual lot topography to minimize site grading, erosion and tree removal. 47 6001 Glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 763 - 593 -9325 Terra Engineering, Inc. 00 Civil Engineering Land Planning • Consulting We are also proposing a Tree Conservation Area Easement to maximize the long term stability of the existing significant trees on the property designated to be saved. Trees within the conservation area will not be allowed to be removed unless damaged or diseased. This Tree Conservation Area Easement will be recorded against all of the abutting lots. Public water to serve the cul -de -sac lots will be provided by extending the existing watermain in Morningside Road. Public sanitary sewer service will be provided by a new public gravity sanitary sewer flowing north to the existing sewer in Littel Street. Stormwater will be collected from the new public street with a storm sewer system and directed to a proposed rain garden/infiltration basin to be constructed as shown on the preliminary plans. The project soil borings indicate that this area is aptly suited for an infiltration area due to the existing porous sand and gravel subsoils. The infiltration basin will be appropriately sized to meet City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District standards. In case of emergency or flooding conditions in the infiltration area, a backup stormwater lift station and forcemain system is proposed. This system would utilize temporary pumps as required to handle any excess storm water. Based on our recent neighborhood meetings, we have added a concrete sidewalk to the west side of the proposed street. This sidewalk would allow residents of the six new homes to safely access the existing neighborhood sidewalk system on Morningside Road and beyond. VARIANCE REQUEST: As discussed above, our proposed project is requesting lot depth variances for three of the proposed eight lots. The proposed eight lots exceed the other zoning standards for lot area and lot width. The zoning ordinance requires new subdivided lots to have a minimum lot depth of 120', or the median lot depth of the existing lots within 500' of the property, whichever is greater. Per the surveyor's calculations, the median lot depth of the existing lots within 500' of this property is 161.5'. The proposed lot width for Lot 4 is 126', Lot 6 is 140', and Lot 7 is 135'. These three lot depths exceed the zoning ordinance standard of 120', but not the neighborhood standard of 161.5'. These proposed reduced lot widths will not adversely impact any existing neighborhood homes. As discussed above, the "Conforming Plat" for eight lots does not require any zoning variances (including lot depth variances), but would require the construction of the through street. 6001 Glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 763 - 593 -9325 Terra Engineering, Inc. see* Civil Engineering Land Planning • Consulting Minnesota statues and Edina ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variances will: Relieve an undue hardship which was not self - imposed or a mere inconvenience: Yes. Due to the unique shape of the existing property, and the unusually deep lots in the immediate neighborhood, the minimum lot depth standard of 161.5' is difficult to achieve with the cul -de -sac design plan. The through street option would not require variances, but would be more detrimental to the environment and the neighborhood. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Yes. Again due to the unique shape of the existing property, the variances are required. This proposed variance is not applicable to other properties in the vicinity because they cannot be subdivided (in a conforming way) such as this property can be. Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. Yes. Since the property can be subdivided into eight conforming lots utilizing the through street option, approving this variance will continue to preserve the property rights of the surrounding neighbors. Based on our neighborhood meetings, a large number of neighbors support the cul -de -sac option (and variances) vs. the through street option. Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Yes. As discussed above, by granting the proposed variances, there will be substantially less site grading, tree removal, and impervious area coverage. The through street option (without variances) would be more detrimental to the public welfare and the neighborhood in general. S 6001 Glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 763 - 593 -9325 41. Terra Engineering, Inc. s• Civil Engineering Land Planning • Consulting Based on the above information, we believe that this project will be an asset to not only the immediate neighborhood, but also to the entire City of Edina. It will provide the opportunity for seven new families to call Edina their home. . We respectfully request review and approval of this single family residential development by the City staff, Planning Commission and City Council. If you have any questions, please call me at 763 -593 -9325, or email me at PeterKnaeble@gmail.com. Sincerely, Peter J. Knaeble, PE Terra Engineering, Inc. ,S 6001 Glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 763 - 593 -9325 Alb 500 FT STUDY (excl. lots in St. Louis Park) 4232 LITTLE ST., EDINA 4412 MORNINGSIDE RD., EDINA SIDELL PROPERTY; "ACRES DuBOIS" 10/30/2012 By: Joshua Schneider, Acre Land Surveying, Inc. RLS #44655 LOT LOT LOT STREET ADDRESS NAME WIDTH (FT) AREA (SF) DEPTH (FT) Oakdale Ave. 4204 Ballard 73.5 9,541 130 Oakdale Ave. 4208 Eberle 74 9,606 130 Oakdale Ave. 4212 Anderson 74 9,606 130 Oakdale Ave. 4216 Bergstedt 74 9,606 130 Oakdale Ave. 4220 Goan 74 9,606 130 Oakdale Ave. 4224 Stevens 74 9,607 130 Oakdale Ave. 4228 Youel 74 9,607 130 Oakdale Ave. 4205 Oakdale LLC 73.5 7,363 100 Oakdale Ave. 4211 Johnson 74 9,248 125 Oakdale Ave. 4215 Graves 74 9,253 125 Oakdale Ave. 4219 Stromberg 74 9,259 125 Oakdale Ave. 4223 Knutson 74 9,265 125 Oakdale Ave. 4227 Mollderm 74 9,270 125 Oakdale Ave. 4231 Schwert 74 9,276 125 42nd St. W. 4407 Sax 60 8,808 142 Lynn Ave. 4200 Benyas 132 11,900 90 Lynn Ave. 4212 Flach 84 10,567 125 Lynn Ave. 4216 Chambers 74 9,254 125 Lynn Ave. 4220 Bracken 74 9,259 125 Lynn Ave. 4224 Rudnicki 74 9,265 125 Lynn Ave. 4228 Hansen 74 9,270 125 Lynn Ave. 4232 Greeley 74 9,276 125 Lynn Ave. 4234 Gabler 100 19,946 200 Lynn Ave. 4236 Nelson 100 19,946 200 Lynn Ave. 4238 Hunt 50 9,970 200 Lynn Ave. 4240 Norberg 50 9,970 200 Lynn Ave. 4242 Ohm 50 9,969 200 Lynn Ave. 4244 Szymczak 50 7,483 150 Lynn Ave. 4246 Cavanaugh 50 7,483 150 Lynn Ave. 4213 Finer 66.7 13,310 200 Lynn Ave. 4215 Horan 66.7 13,308 200 Lynn Ave. 4217 Carl 66.7 13,307 200 Lynn Ave. 4219 Parrish 66.7 13,305 200 Lynn Ave. 4221 Sidell 66.7 13,304 200 Lynn Ave. 4223 Obert 50 9,977 200 Lynn Ave. 4225 Chapman 50 9,976 200 Lynn Ave. 4227 Logelin 50 9,975 200 Lynn Ave. 4231 Veit 50 9,975 200 Lynn Ave. 4233 Harris 90 17,952 200 Lynn Ave. 4235 Mitchell 50 9,972 200 Lynn Ave. 4237 Badenoch 50 9,971 200 Lynn Ave. 4239 Devine 110 21,934 200 Lynn Ave. 4243 Brinkman 50 9,969 200 Lynn Ave. 4245 Hackett 50 7,474 150 Lynn Ave. 4247 Pearson 50 7,456 150 Crocker Ave. 4224 Landrud 67.3 13,439 200 Crocker Ave. 4226 Gorman 66 13,171 200 Crocker Ave. 4228 Crocker LLC 50 9,977 200 Crocker Ave. 4230 Sky Tined LLC 50 9,976 200 Crocker Ave. 4232 Buenz 67 13,367 200 Crocker Ave. 4234 Carlson 66 13,166 200 Crocker Ave. 4236 Potts 67 13,364 200 Crocker Ave. 4238 Kaiser 100 19,944 200 4II Crocker Ave. 4240 Thomas 100 19,940 200 Crocker Ave. 4242 Ellingson 50 9,969 200 Crocker Ave. 4244 Thompson 50 9,968 200 Crocker Ave. 4246 Warren 50 6,735 135 Crocker Ave. 4248 Siftar 50 6,735 135 Morningside Rd. 4408 Hardy 50 7,453 150 Morningside Rd. 4400 Berman 50 7,483 150 Morningside Rd. 4350 Plant 50 7,489 150 Morningside Rd. 4310 Cooper 50 7,483 150 Morningside Rd. 4308 Ratner 65 6,464 100 Morningside Rd. 4307 McGill 50 7,999 160 Morningside Rd. 4309 Toth 50 8,998 180 Morningside Rd. 4311 Murphy 50 8,998 180 Morningside Rd. 4313 Hartley 50- 9,223 184 Morningside Rd. 4315 Yang 50 10,498 210 Morningside Rd. 4317 Hobbs 50 11,336 227 Morningside Rd. 4401 Flemming 50 11,336 227 Morningside Rd. 4403 Hymanson 50 10,740 215 Morningside Rd. 4405 Parlin 50 10,740 215 Morningside Rd. 4409 Monchamp 100 20,982 210 Morningside Rd. 4411 Lawrence 47 6,677 142.2 Morningside Rd. 4413 Wilde 47 6,685 142.2 Morningside Rd. 4415 Bowell 50 4,743 94.8 Morningside Rd. 4417 Goodwin 120 6,381 94.8 Morningside Rd. 4501 Tallakson 140 12,372 88 Oakdale Ave. 4306 Sundberg 63.6 8,926 140 Oakdale Ave. 4312 Ross 60 8,421 140 Oakdale Ave. 4318 Hoffman 50 7,018 140 Oakdale Ave. 4324 Milano 50 7,018 140 Oakdale Ave. 4330 Johns 50 7,018 140 Oakdale Ave. 4334 Pepin 50 7,018 140 Oakdale Ave. 4338 Anschel 50 6,981 140 Oakdale Ave. 4342 Joyce 50 6,981 140 Oakdale Ave. 4303 Carlson 47.4 5,233 109 Oakdale Ave. 4305 Pffeiderer 47.4 _ 8,953 186 Oakdale Ave. 4307 Hannula 47.4 8,207 171 Oakdale Ave. 4309 Grotte 47.4 7,456 155 Oakdale Ave. 4315 Valgemae 47.4 6,708. 140 Branson St. 4410 Aby 117 11,858 102 Branson St. 4408 Falldin 50 11,091 222 Branson St. 4406 Cap 50 11,030 222 Branson St. 4404 Bennett 50 10,719 214 Branson St. 4402 Klatt 50 10,658 213 Branson St. 4400 Vanko 50 9,954 200 Branson St. 4316 Smeby 50 9,290 185 Branson St. 4314 Schwartz 50 9,301 185 Branson St. 4312 Colburn 50 9,707 194 Branson St. 4310 Refinded, LLC 50 9,065 179 Branson St. 4308 Mills 50 8,197 163 MEAN 63.2 10140.0 165.1 102 Total MEDIAN 50.0 9606.0 161.5 4 1'z 500 FOOT OVERLAP SKETCH FOR: FRANK SIDELL 0 150 ( IN FEET ) I inch = 150 ft. •SEE ADDITIONAL SHEETS FOR LOT TABULATION• NORTH W Si— '10- ST' 4M 420; 04901 4407 '4321 05 4317 410 41 4301 fr a v 11 j,4'2 M) to �200 am 4204 ov) 11,41 .421' 4212'7%4 4211 4206 P* ------------- 4208 ---------------- (40 4212 4215 4216 1% 4213- 4� 4212r-- ------- ---- ------- 4204"- 4 117) 4215 01** 4216 W1 4219, .4. v.) (118) 2 4216 L4 > 4217 4220 M le4lm ' I 1112) --- ---- -------- LLI 4220 414 4223 0 4 4 01-D 4227 4228 ----------- 4226� I iI i 4224 4228 4231 4232 4223 IM �422. MAWA. --------- C------ 42�.�- T—W --+JT+Et-&T 4--- 4225 Z 4230 - 1�2 4227 (M 42 232 32 4 3) :9. OTY OF EIMNA 4231 -- -12- M --- - t______. 4233 A ----------- ------- 4 4234 236 - ------ --- - (0- 4235 0' 4238 3 02T) 4237 1; 4238 - ----------- Ci- 0= 11 4238 0 Z . .... --- 5 4239 q: 6 4240 C) 4240 'M 4242 4243 4242 4244 tt01 4245W) 4244 14408 i 4246 m) 42471-) 4246 m 4412 501) 0 4400 4350 (NI 4310 4308 = 4248,m K --- ---- 2 iaz 4 I r J, I - i �Lv ":� 4413 '4411 ; - I • : 4= : . '44153 p=l'jjx�3 44M 1 4311,430 Q, W7— .4313 j,') � (M MIJ:E (M ;o;A! oW b 4403 44401 4317 4315: ("o 'fi . - i 43W — 4303 4405 (M' WI --' (m 0-? 04 IM (17) ry; 4305 tlurlK 4307: ;2 4318 43" 4307 10 :43M 4306: -F 6 * 71 P' -- 4302 -�424 430�-J., 4312 Im 4314, iii\ acs 4406 4402 4400 '4316 fn) 4330 4315 fm'oi 4408 ' : rsrr MM (-1) (a v ---4334 "4410 (140 r 4W- ili . #NSA" 2 - - - --- ------- O'n lU) A., (11) lap I hereby certify that this plan, sketch or report was prepared by vn me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RE LAND SUR P AN jr C763 �7 J6SHUA P. SCHNEIDER Date:-11--15-12 Reg. No. 44655 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR: ACRES DUBOIS EDINA, MINNESOTA •� Q I 42ND St. W. N I Q P SITE A� o o °.. (o I - -- - - --a - - -- 1oNSisrn1161 rn 17' APpLICANVOWNER FRANK SIDELL II 6001 GLENWOOD AVE. 4232 OAKDALE AVE. 0 EDINA, MN 55416 1 612 -805 -6006 PETER KNAEBLE, P.E. IdsidellOgmou.com Pe(e,knoableOgmaa.cam `dNNr90E SOIL ENGINM MERVYN MINOESS, PE 9140 BALTIMORE ST. NE. 1100 CONSULTING SOIL ENGINEER, PLLC O \O 763 -238 -6278 EDINA R -1 ZONING, JOSH SCHNEIDER, RLS 612 -817 -0096 jsacremnd-- yOgmaa.cam 9000 SF MIN. LOT SIZE (500' MEDIAN =9606 SF PER SURVEYOR) ■ FORESTRY CONSULTANT KAMERON KYTONEN 2909 MEADOW LANE 75' MIN. LOT WIDTH (AT 50' FRONT SETBACK) (500' MEDIAN =50.0' PER SURVEYOR) ■ .. 612 - 237 -5996 '50' FROM FRONT LOT LINE AT RT ANGLE TO LOT DEPTH' 763 -614 -4071 ben 9-- heodec.aom 120' MIN. LOT DEPTH (500' - MEDIAN= 161.5' PER SURVEYOR) x 'MID PT OF FRONT LOT LINE TO MID PT OF REAR LOT LINE' 30' FRONT SETBACK (OR MATCH ADJ. HOUSES) 10' SIDE SETBACK ( +6' FOR EVERY FT. IN HT. OVER 15') 5' SIDE SETBACK FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE 15' SIDE SETBACK FOR STREET SIDE CORNER LOT (OR 30' IF SITE ADDRESS: 4232 OAKDALE AVE. & THERE IS AN 'ADJOINING' INTERIOR LOT ON THE SAME STREET) 4412 MORNINGSIDE RD., EDINA, MN 25' REAR SETBACK MAX. FRONT HT. IS 30' TO ROOF MID PT. OR SITE AREA: 136,828 35 ' TO ROOF PEAK SF 3.141 AC. LOT WIDTH TO PERIMETER RATIO > 0.1 MAX. BUILDING COVERAGE 25% LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE SURVEY 30' MIN. STREET FRONTAGE MEDIAN OF LOTS WITHIN 500' 1CHEVER IS GREATER) •� Q I 42ND St. W. N I Q P SITE A� o o °.. (o I - -- - - --a - - -- 1oNSisrn1161 rn 17' LOCATION MAP NO SCALE SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION 1. COVER SHEET / SHEET INDEX 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 3. PRELIM. SITE PLAN 3A. PRELIM. SITE RENDERING 4. PRELIM. UTILITY PLAN 5. PRELIM. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6. PRELIM. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 7. PRELIM. PLAT B. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS, GRADING NOTES & SWPPP 9. CONFORMING CONCEPT PLAN CIVIL ENGINEER/1-AND PLANNER TERRA ENGINEERING INC. APpLICANVOWNER FRANK SIDELL II 6001 GLENWOOD AVE. 4232 OAKDALE AVE. 0 EDINA, MN 55416 m 612 -805 -6006 PETER KNAEBLE, P.E. IdsidellOgmou.com Pe(e,knoableOgmaa.cam `dNNr90E SOIL ENGINM MERVYN MINOESS, PE 9140 BALTIMORE ST. NE. 1100 CONSULTING SOIL ENGINEER, PLLC O 7522 VINEWOOD COURT 763 -238 -6278 MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 JOSH SCHNEIDER, RLS 612 -817 -0096 jsacremnd-- yOgmaa.cam mmindessOaol.com WETLAND CONSULTANT ARROWHEAD ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FORESTRY CONSULTANT KAMERON KYTONEN 2909 MEADOW LANE ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST 14237A O S aNt> R LOCATION MAP NO SCALE SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION 1. COVER SHEET / SHEET INDEX 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 3. PRELIM. SITE PLAN 3A. PRELIM. SITE RENDERING 4. PRELIM. UTILITY PLAN 5. PRELIM. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6. PRELIM. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 7. PRELIM. PLAT B. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS, GRADING NOTES & SWPPP 9. CONFORMING CONCEPT PLAN CIVIL ENGINEER/1-AND PLANNER TERRA ENGINEERING INC. APpLICANVOWNER FRANK SIDELL II 6001 GLENWOOD AVE. 4232 OAKDALE AVE. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 EDINA, MN 55416 763 -593 -9325 612 -805 -6006 PETER KNAEBLE, P.E. IdsidellOgmou.com Pe(e,knoableOgmaa.cam SURVEYM ACRE LAND SURVEYING INC. SOIL ENGINM MERVYN MINOESS, PE 9140 BALTIMORE ST. NE. 1100 CONSULTING SOIL ENGINEER, PLLC BLAINE. MN 55449 7522 VINEWOOD COURT 763 -238 -6278 MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 JOSH SCHNEIDER, RLS 612 -817 -0096 jsacremnd-- yOgmaa.cam mmindessOaol.com WETLAND CONSULTANT ARROWHEAD ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING FORESTRY CONSULTANT KAMERON KYTONEN 2909 MEADOW LANE ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST 14237A MOUND, MN 55364 15 PINTO LANE 612 - 237 -5996 ISANTI, MN 55040 BEN CARLSON. WDC 763 -614 -4071 ben 9-- heodec.aom ko— Wkylon- Cholmail.com LL S m° E c uj W W m NZ 02 KH Wa U(= La QW 11/5/12 —1. 12 -109 x�.a� X % RLA m A C' qm a No �m ZA 1 A I I I I / i • iI - - - - -- -- I .a• - -`•. I I o 60.Y LEI t I -;i,'4 hie, •� n L9 /; r° roN 7taLSn; I gas -T - - - -- ; •.` •' Z'.�•- B' l6•il0pV i5ml' r d'1 fIr I I / ( y l ON S x ]060MNNON r 3srox BDrr t Oxus.3', _ --- 1- -__ - .�.,. tn ( , r � 960 � 1 �. ; - -- L- - _ ' 7 ' lS.�Lfi',2 SiiO X800 =✓-r -9T0 L0. ' . -a• i -1_ — — e. nY zrzr 6 8 - - ' • , s Iq g ------ - - - - -- -- -6`e- - -- d� --j$ —�ll Ow15ix3 OKr r - .: S Z00'ZZ. - °` @, -------------------- - 9600- ir-K- BLO -LO, ''DOfitl '� O1 69Y�' 1' - 3l¢N ,113 S.� W L SI -, — — — _ — — ' /'-`'J5 3 BCir O Cax`` 1 [9. '` ',`� 'i,�,''`� -• — - — — — _ � [y� ----------------- ,., •a,6 •. 9aC miFtl]C' `iB - - i OS ON ONLLS S3 - - -ll 031 Y3 • '`35x N33B0 Y3 S, y I F9ZYI , ON Pr I i S' ai ,.1 9CLr' <i 3x5X I.1,9. ;f9 (i�9 __- - -�,` ',p•,f '/ g _ Sri Fyy o lry - K'0 - s '`., r p'iz', Boa:' `;•�;% y" — �-- — — — 1 Let* Z ----- _- Aso _ °v° -' , l..e',R'' -i - ';' Jo W "•' 6v, �" %ri °� 1 - -__[ - - _ _ _ ;[R1t ; d>d.r.,_ r31isN6 'oyt 'o): •'j_ _ 1 Y I 1 [ `. -v6° gaeo -zen B2 •YO , ` ` •'[¢¢rBLB/ s as _____rsie[- �.JIL' — � — ^'�, I �9�' yc OHS['9cB "11KB dN.` -- -- -'1i , - NNNN @$NN °L s 0 °'� y E o ° N ° I __ - --------- _ -!in___tt' (� -- ,rrc. _ zp M 265'.: $ m m 7 ^''- - -i:-dz:'__ - _vE�b• __ e[ __.rB,; - L 1¢LN3tf5 9e,v1 •_ ----- Fri J5B � o � o - i ` 6600- Zr -rZ- --_ "----------------- Is 919" A� A y -- -- ---[`� ODIO- Lr- K- BLO-LQ � •� •/ l016S'OBB rv5B ; "CSL/ A1tl3dOBd lOOVr� - O ____ _ fie-_ �.� e� NN30WO 113 nzN Og8�m ` Ica - - s D1, 'o _ _ -_ -w -- ___ v- �r,„y ° K . 4 •, YJ 016LlILB 1[68 _- -068'- "'_ �r�i -_- OBa [£06 A� iAV31r31v67CCr 3 0 ONLLSU] ..nc "� 9°sA. -- L - V[M ---._-, •_! - /—dl9 ,9 31 , — 1332 NC0Z9o2o ' a-' - M. '1S ZI1 Zb OB ________ __ F /10`0£1 M OV.7S.69$ [5 —_*R N .Or 'OAH > °4 [£3` .O• f to t55t °N ..H =£=r`, v I i Out Z "Qna� ,S ''•,` r 9 rox ONLL51 %3 - �: < LEI Bur .Z e 3 M— ll -- - - - - -- m I -- - - - - -- 1 ------- - -- t__ -------- ----- Mffl CO. z R z C a — EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN m, a `� .9.°' �.� s Terra o k n may ne ACRES DUBOIS min eaDOlia, Minnesota a 55422 EDINA, MN 't "� Dote: - 1,/5/12 Beg. x, leas[.... w°'f�°1�a.we 7635939325 Fax: 763 512 0717 I ! I `; •• L_, I COrr I I I ;1 I 1 [OY4 I 601, X % RLA m A C' qm a No �m ZA 1 A I I I I / i • iI - - - - -- -- I .a• - -`•. I I o 60.Y LEI t I -;i,'4 hie, •� n L9 /; r° roN 7taLSn; I gas -T - - - -- ; •.` •' Z'.�•- B' l6•il0pV i5ml' r d'1 fIr I I / ( y l ON S x ]060MNNON r 3srox BDrr t Oxus.3', _ --- 1- -__ - .�.,. tn ( , r � 960 � 1 �. ; - -- L- - _ ' 7 ' lS.�Lfi',2 SiiO X800 =✓-r -9T0 L0. ' . -a• i -1_ — — e. nY zrzr 6 8 - - ' • , s Iq g ------ - - - - -- -- -6`e- - -- d� --j$ —�ll Ow15ix3 OKr r - .: S Z00'ZZ. - °` @, -------------------- - 9600- ir-K- BLO -LO, ''DOfitl '� O1 69Y�' 1' - 3l¢N ,113 S.� W L SI -, — — — _ — — ' /'-`'J5 3 BCir O Cax`` 1 [9. '` ',`� 'i,�,''`� -• — - — — — _ � [y� ----------------- ,., •a,6 •. 9aC miFtl]C' `iB - - i OS ON ONLLS S3 - - -ll 031 Y3 • '`35x N33B0 Y3 S, y I F9ZYI , ON Pr I i S' ai ,.1 9CLr' <i 3x5X I.1,9. ;f9 (i�9 __- - -�,` ',p•,f '/ g _ Sri Fyy o lry - K'0 - s '`., r p'iz', Boa:' `;•�;% y" — �-- — — — 1 Let* Z ----- _- Aso _ °v° -' , l..e',R'' -i - ';' Jo W "•' 6v, �" %ri °� 1 - -__[ - - _ _ _ ;[R1t ; d>d.r.,_ r31isN6 'oyt 'o): •'j_ _ 1 Y I 1 [ `. -v6° gaeo -zen B2 •YO , ` ` •'[¢¢rBLB/ s as _____rsie[- �.JIL' — � — ^'�, I �9�' yc OHS['9cB "11KB dN.` -- -- -'1i , - NNNN @$NN °L s 0 °'� y E o ° N ° I __ - --------- _ -!in___tt' (� -- ,rrc. _ zp M 265'.: $ m m 7 ^''- - -i:-dz:'__ - _vE�b• __ e[ __.rB,; - L 1¢LN3tf5 9e,v1 •_ ----- Fri J5B � o � o - i ` 6600- Zr -rZ- --_ "----------------- Is 919" A� A y -- -- ---[`� ODIO- Lr- K- BLO-LQ � •� •/ l016S'OBB rv5B ; "CSL/ A1tl3dOBd lOOVr� - O ____ _ fie-_ �.� e� NN30WO 113 nzN Og8�m ` Ica - - s D1, 'o _ _ -_ -w -- ___ v- �r,„y ° K . 4 •, YJ 016LlILB 1[68 _- -068'- "'_ �r�i -_- OBa [£06 A� iAV31r31v67CCr 3 0 ONLLSU] ..nc "� 9°sA. -- L - V[M ---._-, •_! - /—dl9 ,9 31 , — 1332 NC0Z9o2o ' a-' - M. '1S ZI1 Zb OB ________ __ F /10`0£1 M OV.7S.69$ [5 —_*R N .Or 'OAH > °4 [£3` .O• f to t55t °N ..H =£=r`, v I i Out Z "Qna� ,S ''•,` r 9 rox ONLL51 %3 - �: < LEI Bur .Z e 3 M— ll -- - - - - -- m I -- - - - - -- 1 ------- - -- t__ -------- ----- Mffl CO. z R z C a — EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN m, a `� .9.°' �.� s Terra o k n may ne ACRES DUBOIS min eaDOlia, Minnesota a 55422 EDINA, MN 't "� Dote: - 1,/5/12 Beg. x, leas[.... w°'f�°1�a.we 7635939325 Fax: 763 512 0717 7W i I 1 1 uu1 i I I I I I I I I I I I Sol, I tilt I fill I sill I I I I I I I I °fi 0V08 301SONINNON I I I I 90tY I ON�LLSi %3 I . I r pp NLL M Lfif ONLLSI %3 �xu�M03 OKr - - - - - -- - ear ON"X1Z 9CZt q.-.' III1e ---- - - - - -- I' I 1 a If i � 1 I 0 o °€ II fA qaa ygE- - - - - - - - - - i Altl]dOtld All] I W0a ,0s ee ,Lz Q �I omio QI Q D 0� D r , ml D G m z I ml� I 11191 O is Z19'Zl - - - - -- 791 - --' O d5 lll'Zl — .� - - -•_ ,9'191 - - -- es�cll'zl ao O� �a a VNI43 - - - -- -- F M21Vt1 SIf10, 'ts '%NOS ON I L9i, I !WN ONLL51 %3 L---- - - - - -- I — i I9zr I � In I L — — — — — — — — — — CIE. _ I 9 0 I D I a I 69z, _---- •_ —L7t-9 7 — — — — u n N 9� 0 !S 9lI'Zl o I ---- - - - - -- .0 Ox DOE, C Ox pr Cl9l — �— J r I 192r c .is Cll'Zl 2 I r- - — — — — — - - — — ,L'l9l — — — — Z I LSLY I° u is 6ll'ZI V' I � c 0 9 I 10HSC'OLD '1n56 ON — — — — — — — — — — — I - - - - -- l9l - - - -- I sszr ,L' 1° I I L N I I N is ZZl'ZI ° ai L - - - - -- — — — — o - - - -- _ _ 9l _ _ loNSraee lose oN 1 9'l - - -- KEt 8 JS 909'91 II O -•t[6 ' '.313 C WL Ls /L Ip° p O 9'lf m VOL9 OH 3WO 1069 I '34r 31r0%r0 ZCL, 35110N ONL-Li O O y 13381S ,31111 <` — O ✓ I ICE, La. I S I I s 3 M — — — — — — — — — — I I 4 ,0'Of t MOtl ,M D pNI 0 9LLf i / D 35nOH 9N115M3 D m / ncf — — — — :- - - -- 2E CONFORMING CONCEPT PLAN " =3C a w am °. ' � on: a� ° s NEng-1 w ol° l N° ACRES DUBOIS $l °� EDINA, MN —.J —Ell P.E. Oole: II/5 /lf eep NI. 14544 15 Z/l Z4 - � I _ I a1L. I I— — I I I — Terra �6 eNnun. 6001 Glenwood Avenue Mlnneep,lis. Minnesole 55422 — —' 763 593 9325 Fax: 763 512 071 T!0 Zi9 E91 rei 9ZE6 E69 E9( : .. . zzbss e, se - W •aleaea5ulw .. ]a .,... r •,l.a .. NW `VNIa3 .N . . vp — al97009 3 /� Nnw SI08nQ S3LI�ld . O J.V .121dNIWll32ld a a S. N � / I / 4224 .. w - .. E. I .17. 15 � .. / / / rI� JL n I I I 17.. a o� Q72 ,f a 4228 ° R S B I. 42J, I .. 41 ROo W - - 17,0 42 1/2 ST. W. wl Vs I IQ LITTEL: STREET gR OZ 15- FASE gi 1}Q "gam �i°I i o o xIp BIo SF E f orr PROPERrrk• 2;5 4253 .. -CWR I -_ �N ° / I — J--- - - - = -- 25 RSB 0 I EE EOwsv. 1 J, A V ___ -- 12,170 .2 I T 4255 I -- F 108�&SE. i- — I. I — - — \ 20. 1REE EOR6.— .— .— .— .�. —. —. — — — — — — — — — — v 1734 --------------- - 425] I Y - I am I �5 rC \ \ 94.350 F9B1 _ m J 4261 \y� \` 99.5 -I ----- - - - - -� 0' R ROW 423e L ;I j?J ---------------- 40' ROW .255 .0 50- — — — — — — — — — — .235 IJI, N 1 \iNEEU yam; \TM ---------------- wISFI-- 4269 i I !! I \ 4240 N i1 \ll w I �1 -------- - - - - -- w 'a I r I Z a i i 3 ,2.,13 SF li` I. _ <¢ w/P.O.,a rh 4242 o- -- r------ - - - - -- 4273 I I ! I . N I .. .. oI I I W I 4244 ----- - - - - -- I oh 4 4 N I I 1,1 �I N I /li SF I m n h L------ - - - - -- j N408 - -- I a I , 4281 I f — I oI. i I of I .:0 �I 1125,2 SF 0 �------ -- - - -- — — — — — — — — — — I w L155. 1 LJ w 30' F58 i .25] I EASE. STR61.4 44M oo EET — — — — — —� 50• ROW I — Ro - ST. LOUIS PARK — — — — — — _ — J pR�t I �A 10A 91. - MORNINGSIDE ROAD - �i P — v oP�oQ• ..,] I 4419 I ,4,3 4411 4409 4405 i 4403. I 4401 41, � GA — IL3 650).6)6.]910 -------- — L - -- -1-10 10* RO I < < 0 L E 6wRE 69 9.0 LO KOUT B T 90 .0 G R 912. .Ti -_ -------- ------ 27 WIN somwl ------------ ------ ------ .----87z. 0 INV L ------ B 5.00 6)1.00 1 ON --- 7 WALKOL17 T 8770 % 884.0 I +' GR�'TY PROPCRT ------------ - -EL— -- --- — --------- -------- --- ------ ----- ---------------- 01, • L fiEMM ----------- ........ ... ------- -------- ------------ - - -- -------- I T WA I 97. "6 6. WELL • 4.00G • I 1 4235 — --- --- - - - - -- 0 U X ELL EH snxc FC 42M — — — — — — — — — — — - .9 dbl '. -- ----------- 0 SE 4242 -- --- — — — — — — — — — 424. L SW R < 4 -'-Ol 4403 • Lill, I VIII ------------ MORNINGSIDE ROAD --------------- A ,as I ----------------------- ----------- - ---------------------- -------------------- --------- !413 44M 44D5 4403? 4401 Fl li F] F--L-1 F-7 F7, 7 X14 TLO ZIS M MA 9ZE6 E69 C9Z Td r NW 'VN103 zzvsg eiosauu!lq 'Gliodeauu!V4 sioend S383V ..—v P.....19 7009 1-1 7-P ... 0-3 cl, uj Wnd -IOaNO3 NOIS083'(INV ONIOV80 ANWrin38d g H 4 ------------ 4224 I— w — — — — — — — — ----- LLI — — — — — — — — — w E 3 CL > < 4714 L' EM SYING NOOSE < 0 s 1 1 4U$ 4232tt 0 40' It" .................. 42 1/2 ST. W ti :r-TF STREET s - ---------- - GA — IL3 650).6)6.]910 -------- — L - -- -1-10 10* RO I < < 0 L E 6wRE 69 9.0 LO KOUT B T 90 .0 G R 912. .Ti -_ -------- ------ 27 WIN somwl ------------ ------ ------ .----87z. 0 INV L ------ B 5.00 6)1.00 1 ON --- 7 WALKOL17 T 8770 % 884.0 I +' GR�'TY PROPCRT ------------ - -EL— -- --- — --------- -------- --- ------ ----- ---------------- 01, • L fiEMM ----------- ........ ... ------- -------- ------------ - - -- -------- I T WA I 97. "6 6. WELL • 4.00G • I 1 4235 — --- --- - - - - -- 0 U X ELL EH snxc FC 42M — — — — — — — — — — — - .9 dbl '. -- ----------- 0 SE 4242 -- --- — — — — — — — — — 424. L SW R < 4 -'-Ol 4403 • Lill, I VIII ------------ MORNINGSIDE ROAD --------------- A ,as I ----------------------- ----------- - ---------------------- -------------------- --------- !413 44M 44D5 4403? 4401 Fl li F] F--L-1 F-7 F7, 7 X14 .. , F-1 G L\ o., I I I I ao I. I I 60„ I Ilf, I cite I Gl,t I Litt a0 n a YLH d10 .9 -- AO OVOa- 3 IS`JNI ON Na (lOHS)SE'SW (Lora) als0cls- \ . - I -NVS d0A ,6 - 1 I 1 I I '%9.05 OH AO - '35tl3 ,Ol W„ I r-- - - - - -- �1 I[ezr D I i I INH OHLLSrc3 . oI �I L---- - - - - -- 1------= - - - - -� I II I L - - - - -- _iJ I _ --- — — — — — — BB.. � — I . - I 905 1 > ON AG — — — — — — — — — ssoo6zl ob +( a[ .cz I Hw to - - - - - -- L_ -- - - - - -- 1 - -- -- - - - - -- e o Z 3u' g I-------- - - - -I� I a E,E, I D D Z gam• - o3Xu9n3 - L'BL'9®,691 I Z I ^ D N m AX I I m .--- ---- -- - - -- INI 33 I — — — — — — — — — — N OfE, '03AONA3801 89E, L- — — — _ — — — — 3lLLHNaO 3 I x m^ 0 3H.0 C -- - - - - -- "° Ngyg — �XUSµN�3 ZH naa a'.os - m 5 < ° „> - 0'069 0V06H /06'406 50+ 3i a Sc I I I I - os or S „7�o ]m1Sa3 ll x - 1.. I I s9z, on.o� $gN� 'Gb'09,65 arms ao't6e _� — NNW'o06 /00'r0 I I e ___ _____ lBJ - z3� 9cz / — � I J 99'Z6B /9L'Z6H /0'LO6 — � � �1 El �' F��pptpj((( I 19E, 1113M "x3@ \ \ \\ I I- N a — _ _ — — — — _ c p .L n33H ` O N size I 1. n \ Lll 8LB/ S' 8 AO I I Hi x_-,c86£'0l®,£S — — — — — — � Z 1 OS'9L8 IN. ___- - - -] - 0- -- 35x31 I ssz. fi r r I 1 (,S 016,91) _ - - -- - 10'4[6 /l l'4LH /0'199 •n5r±o] 33x1 ,oz \ I _. —'j.� L ooro[B 'n t IsN'N — ---- - - -,-- __� ('slo a3N Zl0 _ 1 ae L-- X3#'1 -- sI I (\ ',°..e. vd i�..:: • Wn,SVE29 lnse W ( m1 I �`.__. ii.- cszr - i g uuuoaa mo ..I^ L .I 09xc8 •nm P A`"-JI I tll .35�� gI %vciW.Sl l i� 13 o00V [9/c _ ' g' rm anna ao Ice I I I g g. 9li 10reib 'nw rvle. a0ro9e. oo slCe9ii - - : S/. "LO l 00 ue . J ,'088 o 11006LB I r SL 10 j(sl IY [B /00'LL ,O r.� _ tie - arac'9ce lose ` - Sb CL6 /SS £L910'190 G" 3W,'3nr 3W,0 O zcz, Z �!0 W 35nOH ONI15p13 N s —, —� > Im Xsoe cce /cr0se o� KM dl3 "9 x_4'09,59 � ll_ZI ffZ/ 133als 131in 91Xn 7' - HSBa'9L8 /9E 080 -� , D” m.. g. . -. O zczr I azzr i pI D 35nOH OHLLSnt3 > / BI[. In I- - — — — — — c: I ---- = - - - -- x m in m / I N or R PRELIMINARY UTiUTY PLAN L`L<'r” °e ' "" B as Terra [n9 e • W-1 1 Ne Eng c. In( In , , Ln s 6001 Glenwood Avenue 0 \ ACRES DUBOIS Y (e ^��� k k ® ® ®' Minneapolis. Minnesota 55422 0 N - Pelee J. NweDl ez. eaa.x EDINA; MN vale. Ilnva pep Ne. 14841 �s•�Oe 763 Faz'76351207 3 Ar I "I "I COr. ; SOrr I�I aorr I I I ------- - - - - -� I 9rLr I I ap» - - - -- OEfiSWrt3 II I ----------------- . .. Nusu zrzr OxLLSn3 — — — — — — — — — — �wi�i Or ------- - -0Opp-- �n- arzr 0i+ilSi %3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9EZr tl `-c y . I I I � I J I I I--]' I I; III I u I.. I I I ao cit. S", oz L... a ' I M0a ,0r rczr O 9 � I a ezz. z 35fgN ONUSnl3 D OV08 30SONIN80w VNIm m U) _ ) 05 ON OB 1M05 a0. X A ,LL M08 tl AS OJ a ,SE &W,-1-0- 0 n m � L ---------- - - - - -- ��- A1tl3dOtld Al1O a -.rL9 'A313 OOO'U L61L 8 I Lair I fl(IX 'JNLLSp(3 L----- - - - - -- I I � W, i I I — — — — — — — — — -- Iz- I CLLr I I g I � I I eae. N F I t----- - - - - -- I I---------- E92r N I — I 192r I I Lszr I -1 I E i. IOHSc Ste 'Ina (A I I ssLr I I I PzL — — — — — — — — — — LONSE'oee Lnse w ESL. F 0 y -i D D D m 4 ON Pr 1 3SAON LINuSIX3 - MNiS 131111 M '1S Z/l Z4 ' I M0a ,0r rczr O 9 � I N LEe. I L� I D ezz. z 35fgN ONUSnl3 D m U) o D A / arLr I I ` 3 AS'- - - -- -- -- - - - - -- c I m ---- - - - - -- .zz. // — I a o N PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN .. °Nwr u �. a "m° a• °r ° ° ,.' "w e.iy S „� Terri m L— d °r a e °1 m• EnDnraNnG� s. 9e enwootl Avenue ACRES DUBOIS Minneapolis. Minnesota 55422 1. . EDINA, MN 7635939325 Fax: 763 512 0711 \f v ®'rl c. s 3 CD c-n PRELIMINARY SITE RENDERING Twra Gl— d A—.. 55422 7635939325 Fax:7635120717 CJ V 0 H C I S D N I N 2I 0 PD�':, J. —W P.E. ®'rl c. s 3 CD c-n PRELIMINARY SITE RENDERING Twra Gl— d A—.. 55422 7635939325 Fax:7635120717 ACRES DUBOIS EDINA, MN PD�':, J. —W P.E. z f: r -L ;L I ®'rl c. s 3 CD c-n PRELIMINARY SITE RENDERING Twra Gl— d A—.. 55422 7635939325 Fax:7635120717 ACRES DUBOIS EDINA, MN PD�':, J. —W P.E. I I >Ir I Ig I� Ix I g I � I I 0 4/r�q< I F q�, I L. V u OTTAWA AVE. S. €4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �_ I CDSBNG ROUSE I E%NSTWG Np15E I ExR1WG ROUSE I F:1051wG NOVSE I I pi I I I I I I I wsTRC NasE o f I I o I I w I � I — J------- I--- - - - - -- L---- -I--- L------ I - - - - -J KI i o o 2 �.� ✓ I y. I I I I I V ;� �� �•� � ;d I I I I I x v a L - - - -J L-- TO'EAJ L - - -- o - K o 4 5. R 8 A /1 s L - - - - -- w" I N u EIOSTINO HOUSE _ � I � � I I I I I ST. LOUIS PARK 10' EASE. I; - I � y I� dd 1, '\ GAR. �I 20' EASE. i Lam. ^ �-- — — I I I I I I EI - -i H m r A m imn E 9 yW f ° 1 EDINA I N I = Ia 1 � I I 3E pie OAKDALE AVENUE I . %EeAS I I TREES SURVEYED 201 I I I I I n I ESTIM. TREES SAVED 110 (54.7% Exs Nc NOUSE ESTIM. TREES REMOVED 91 (45.3 %) I I I I I I FINAL TREE REMOVAL COUNT WILL DEPEND I I- I I ON ACTUAL HOME SIZES AND ELEVATIONS. I I I I N z I LEGL'lYQ:. Q B -5 DENOTE5 SOIL BORING - - - - - -- DENOTES SILT FENCE /GRADING LuT `v Y m - DENOTES EYISTLNG CONTOURS TREE INVENTORY BY KAMERON — 6 Y DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SD D b 60 DENOTES SMR. SEWER SEE DETAILED TREE INVENTORY KYTONEN, CERTIFIED ARBORIST >-- DENOas SANITARY SEWER SCALE FEET SPREADSHEET FOR MORE #4237A. TREE SURVEY BY ACRE '', „ DENOTES Em5nNGN OT ELEVARON THE LOCA�OF E%SRNO UNDERGRO NO UT MS ME L OVm IN AN APPRO—TE INFORMATION. x 1056.0 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION Y ONLY. THE ExCAVARNG CO TRACTW SHALL DETERUNE THE EXACT LOCATION O LAND SURVEY B -1 2 . DENOTES EDERGENCY O ERROW E LVADON ALL EASTING UTTUTIES BEFORE CORNE —G WORN. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE ( EOFC+1050.0 FuuY RESPONSIBLE FaR ANY AND ALL DANAGES —CH —T BE M—ONCD By ws FAAURE TO E%ACTEY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNXE MO NO .-L-TES. zQ uj J W } O O M z =) � w La z 0-(L ¢W 11/5/12 12 -109 -6 tl r w i Q Q H F- O N W _ -'_ -L 4 ,42 1/2 1 /2 ST. IN Q G <I EXISTING HOUSE wI 4232 OAKDALE WO BSMT 876.7. �I I N 0 = 9° 7/87 FLOOD ELEV. i N w 4253 d WO BSMT 880.3SHOT BSMT. 876.35HOT I N 4257 I w II 4261 GARAGE I 0 o I U I2 F W 4265 I - — — — — w — — — — — o _ U Z 4269 I N I 0 U I F W I 4273 I I N I 0 I F 4281 I N w I I E I 4287 I 40' ROW LITTEL STREET e,l .0 i2 •3 •. .i a15 �.•% +6 4 •5 � 0 �7 6 •TS' EASE. =? — � I I YI I I lI I I wI CITY PI I I V) II Ld I J° �I fe . • 1 _ =22 i .v7 10' EASE_ 1 • • ?7 � 6 — — — =46 '9F .178 . .1 6 +R I / �'1 • ,49 =176 j / � •4445 =501} 173 ! _. / •191 \ 54 CI 1 !GRADING LIMIT / i I I D,67j ( (1.94 AC.) \ \' I { {` I • \'\ •75 I {I { I�/�165 \ t I 30 • •164 \ •203 1 1171 158 ";% I I i i9 0�1 ` `68.67 } ^ \ \ 6 66 .62/ = =201 6 . ^ 63 /•6, 5. 2 202 •77 \ \ X X01 t •61 7 •78 • 79( ' 1 50' R ROW 003 1 5 L ' — — — — — — _. --\ 0' R FC 1 'ss —j�7 M ME •95 jI•fiB I I 0 09 w 08 1 031 W 112 W I� •2�sOI TJO • •206 I I / II; / i 095 Q Q Jo � . °I *116 209 • •208 I I * . .119 - --- --1 i Irr I I • 136 •1 3 2 2J• 27 1 1 1 p 5 13 p •13 I 13 I,^Q� NO 5DWK. ST. LOUIS PARK--- - - - - -J Aa3 4234 `/ Z Z _ a O LLJ V r J w J J 0 3 w 0 O Q O Q W J N -Lj < O Lj x w w o bi J w Q WU L'i a s �wwEo ZJ U � 0 a� U W Z O K U 1. Z V U p 0 4 V N 0c 0 0 0 0 c z z 11, w w w w 6 p p 0 o c 1 � 1 eI m l op 0 0 2 F _ N w 4236 Ex15TWG HOUSE 4238 EXISTING . — — — C A R A G E — — — — — - E %ISTING 4240 GARAGE - -� -- - - - - -- EXISTIN HOUSE 4242 XISTIN GARAG I I 4244 EXISTING HOUSE 4408 I 4246 I Ir - -- -- 4400 0 ix w m LL w -Ig V4XISTING HOUSE— --- _.882.UT-TE STREET A4 _BBO --a73. A 884.0 Cj?'lDeI7Y PROPERTY IF A10 21 --eqz WELLI is ED zzz? 897.00 5 X ELL EX STING 40' ROY B3 MUSE 7 4238 BSM 01.0 C4 5 4AS9 TO eemo 4240 L3 a 9 4242 T, o W5 JA Si. LOU A)A --vv | | � J Hi / 7. Ymc- mi B� ------------ rrj QL fit I CA uft 0 CONFORMING CONCEPT PLAN Tem ACRES DUBOIS Mh-ph, Ml,-Et. 66422 EDINA, MN -Lt4V-t2-hq W -44 163 593 9325 F- T63 512 0717 Tree Inventory Sidell Property, Acres Debuis Terra Engineering Inc. Revised: 11/5/12 PER PLAN DATED 11/5/12 Notes from tree inventory by Kytonen: 1. Inventory performed on Saturday, July 21, 2012 by Kameron Kytonen, ISA Certified Arborist #4237A; numbered tags were set in the trees and the spreadsheet below is a summary of the data collected. 2. For tree numbers 201 -209, ribbons were used for these groups of conifers; the number was written on the ribbon; we tried to put the ribbon in the middle of the said group. 3. Many of the insignificant understory trees consist of common buckthorn, a non - native invasive tree. 4. Oak wilt may be present in the north part of the property (where some dead red oaks were noted below). 5. Some of the large bur oaks are rotting /decaying and have signs of insect damage in the trunk. 6. All coniferous trees shown are 6 fool or greater height. Notes Save Remove Number of Tree # Species DBH (in.) stems Condition 1 boxelder 25.5 good 2 boxelder 10 leaner good 3 boxelder 11.5 Remove good 4 boxelder 11 good 5 boxelder 12.5 good 6 boxelder 10 fair 7 boxelder 3,5,8,10 4 good 8 boxelder 13 good 9 American elm 14 good 10 boxelder 14 Save good 11 green ash 12 fair 12 green ash 11 fair 13 black walnut 6.5 good 14 black walnut 8 good 15 green ash 8.5 excellent 16 black walnut 9.5 good 17 green ash 11,11,12.5 3 fair 18 black walnut 6 good 19 bur oak 28 fair 20 boxelder 7 fair 21 boxelder 11.5 good 22 boxelder 15 good 23 American elm 10.5 good 24 boxelder 13 good 25 bur oak 36 fair 26 boxelder 6 fair 27 boxelder 9.5 excellent 28 bur oak 12 dead Notes Save Remove leaner Remove leaner Remove leaner Remove leaner Remove leaner Remove leaner Remove leaner Remove Remove Remove Remove Save Save Save Remove Remove Save Save Save Save Save Remove A a� Save Save Save Save Save Save Save DON'TCOUNT 29 boxelder 18 poor leaner Save DON'TCOUNT 30 red elm 7.5 fair Save 31 - American elm 15 good Save 32 buroak 26 dead Save DON'TCOUNT 33 buroak 26 good Save - 34 boxelder 6 good. Save 35 boxelder 6 fair Save 36 boxelder 6 good Save 37 hackberry 7 fair Save 38 boxelder 6 good Save 39 boxelder 9 fair leaner Save 40 bur oak 16.5 dead Remove DON'TCOUNT 41 boxelder 8 good Save 42 buroak 26 good Save 43 boxelder 6 fair Save 44 hemlock 4 good Save 45 boxelder 7 good Save 46 American elm 9 good Remove 47 boxelder 13 good leaner Save 48 boxelder 17.5 good leaner Save 49 green ash 7.5 good Remove 50 basswood 9,13 2 good Remove 51 bur oak 16 excellent Remove 52 buroak 24.5 excellent Remove 53 bur oak 17 fair Remove 54 white spruce 6 good Remove 55 buroak 9,11,12,13,14 5 good Remove 56 bur oak 22 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 57 sugar maple 6 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 58 red elm 8 good Remove 59 American elm 11.5 good Remove 60 bur oak 27.5 fair Remove 61 boxelder 7 fair leaner Remove 62 mulberry 8 good Remove 63 boxelder 7 fair Remove 64 bur oak 14,22 2 fair leaner Remove 65 American elm 26 poor Remove DON'T COUNT 66 boxelder 7.5 fair Remove 67 American elm 10.5 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 68 boxelder 6 fair Remove 69 boxelder 7 good Remove 70 blackwalnut 9 good Remove 71 hackberry 6 good Remove 72 buroak 21.5 good Save 73 boxelder 9 good leaner Remove 74 boxelder 9 good Remove Aa� 75 silver maple 11 fair Remove 76 mulberry 7.5 good Remove 77 blue spruce 17 fair Remove 78 red maple 11 fair Remove 79 balsam fir 10.5 fair Remove 80 crabapple 5,5 2 fair Remove DON'T COUNT 81 blue spruce 14 fair Remove 82 blue spruce 13 fair Save 83 blue spruce 11.5 poor Save DON'T COUNT 84 blue spruce 10 dead Save DON'T COUNT 85 blue spruce 15 good Save 86 blue spruce 11 fair Save 87 blue spruce 8.5 poor Save DON'T COUNT 88 blue spruce 9.5 fair Save 89 silver maple 15.5 good Save 90 blue spruce 9.5 poor Save DON'T COUNT 91 buroak 33 good Remove 92 blue spruce 13.5 fair Save 93 blue spruce 12 fair Save 94 blue spruce 12 poor Save DON'TCOUNT 95 black walnut 21 excellent Save 96 black walnut 23 excellent Save 97 buroak 30 good Remove 98 buroak 32 good Remove 99 red oak 39 good Remove 100 blue spruce 12 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 101 blue spruce 11.5 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 102 blue spruce 10.5 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 103 bur oak 38 good Remove 104 blue spruce 6 fair Save 105 blue spruce 12 poor Save DON'T COUNT 106 blue spruce 12 fair Remove 107 blue spruce 12 fair Remove 108 blue spruce 11 poor Save DON'T COUNT 109 blue spruce 19 fair Save 110 bur oak 26 fair Remove 111 buroak 22 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 112 buroak 27 fair Remove 113 buroak 43 excellent Remove 114 blue spruce 11 poor Save DON'TCOUNT 115 buroak 29.5 good Save 116 blue spruce 15 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 117 blue spruce 14.5 fair Save 118 blue spruce 11 poor Remove DON'TCOUNT 119 blue spruce 11 poor Save DON'TCOUNT 120 buroak 20 good Save 6 at 121 blue spruce 12 fair 122 blue spruce 10.5 fair 123 silver maple 7 good 124 blue spruce 12 good 125 blue spruce 7 fair 126 blue spruce 12 fair 127 blue spruce 10.5 fair 128 blue spruce 12 fair 129 blue spruce 15.5 good 130 bur oak 22 good 131 buroak 7,15 2 poor 132 buroak 21.5 fair 133 while spruce 12 fair 134 buroak 25.5 good 135 buroak 23 good 136 blue spruce 7 good 137 bur oak 22.5 fair 138 buroak 24 fair 139 buroak 20,22.5 2 good 140 bur oak 22 fair 141 buroak 14.5 fair 142 American elm 33 poor 143 blue spruce 12 poor 144 blue spruce 11.5 fair 145 blue spruce 11.5 fair 146 blue spruce 11.5 poor 147 blue spruce 14 good 148 blue spruce 12 fair 149 blue spruce 16 good 150 blue spruce 14.5 poor 151 Siberian elm 28 fair 152 buroak 16 poor 153 bur oak 12 fair 154 buroak 18 good 155 Siberian elm 20 fair 156 buroak 16 good 157 bur oak 5,6 2 . fair 158 red elm 11.5 fair 159 buroak 14 dead 160 buckthorn 8 fair 161 buckthorn 7 fair 162 buroak 23 fair 163 silver maple 12 good 164 green ash 8 fair 165 red maple 6 excellent 166 black cherry 11,12 2 fair Save Save leaner Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save invasive Save invasive Save Save llim Save Save Remove Remove DON'TCOUNT Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT Remove Save leaner Remove Remove Remove Save Save leaner Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save Save invasive Save invasive Save Save llim Save Save Remove Remove DON'TCOUNT Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT DON'T COUNT 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 buroak 29 black cherry 7.5 boxelder 9 bur oak 20 boxelder 7.5 red oak 11 American elm 26.5 green ash 6 boxelder 12 red oak 17 red oak 10 red oak 16 black walnut 24 boxelder 14 red maple 10 bur oak 29 sugar maple 10 boxelder 8 green ash 13.5 green ash 10 black ash 7 green ash 7 bur oak 16.5 green ash 19 red maple 7 hemlock 2,2,2 hemlock 2,3 balsam fir 2 "-6" balsam fir V -4" white pine 4 arborvitae 2 " -5" arborvitae 2 " -5" white spruce 6 balsam fir 6 200 trees surveyed Save 154 trees counted (excl. poor, dead, small, etc.) 3 2 18 11 25 13 excellent fair good good fair dead excellent good poor dead dead dead excellent poor excellent good good good fair good good fair fair good fair fair fair good good good good good poor fair leaner leaner leaner leaner Save Save Save Save Save Save DON'TCOUNT Save Save Save DON'TCOUNT Save DON'TCOUNT Save DON'TCOUNT Save DON'TCOUNT Save Save DON'TCOUNT Save Save Save Remove Save Save Save Remove Remove Save Save Remove DON'T COUNT Remove DON'TCOUNT Remove DON'TCOUNT Save DON'TCOUNT Save Remove DON'TCOUNT Remove DON'TCOUNT Remove DON'TCOUNT Save 86 68 55.8% 44.2 Saved Removed I 1 (4 7, q.vl - re Vrom-118"llill "�j cut O .O TOWNES CIR. 0. 0 WHITE OAKS RD. sqG s is THe AREA SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION 1. COVER SHEET / SHEET INDEX 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 3. PRELIM. SITE PLAN 3A. PRELIM. SITE RENDERING 4. PRELIM. UTILITY PLAN 5. PRELIM. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6. PRELIM. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 7. PRELIM. PLAT 8. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS, GRADING NOTES & SWPPP 431 px3di g an •i(1l5) . (39) t 7 1173) ,(132)V jJ01 I (]al (i5) 9 (I]) 8 (79) 8 (109) 8 (106) N.1 12 SE.1 /4 SEC This is not a legally recorded map. It represents S /-" /, S /NE /7 a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. N /SW/7 200 400 Feet Print Date: Thu Jul 11 13:2:33 20 VgCAC S/SW /7 S /SE /7 � ✓�c� �� Eighth /( A,1" 0 a. 10 ro d It Stj /0 � e .1,i 1q 2x Na S EK .r1 14 Se EY A_ Y- i S• e p_ q_ _ x v ♦C . S " wxPp) q I 11x111 N (1x 1 1) q (t 13) (IM) A (13) - 0 0 2r 11211 (<91 (108 ) — w w w W ST 42ND i pot) (123) W ' 10Qn�.LENr' ,pfi• , >tn rn ;' 1 • 11 xes 1rr s,1 S , �; ,� ,n ,I 1 C 8 (82) (&%) g (42) (44) 8 g(39) d01 x 41 ( ) 8 (I I 1 x 2) 6 1122) X21)- (4�) w w 9 ? (+a2) 2r n n w > pz4) — O ,a (81) (45) a) R j .x a x. a x 8 e R _ (3B1 a x e R > 1103) 1120) ✓C (109) (4) 51 < m w (46) fi) F - (104) 1119) 1110) xx • e_ 8 x, , g • B Nil Z �x a g (i9) J) R,4k C , t�fiM( nx an ,1 e1 posl Pie) 2 „) 1 (35) 1 :9) •y �xs C¢].1 . � /t✓ $fnfi W (Jrzl 9 F_ (481 E_ a B �� (6) E U 1106) ¢ (11 i) (1121 Q xm 11 7.v ¢ Y�. xm (]6J .¢Yy is a (77) N9) �•IN j I 3d 1 t.i� 0]1 O x131 g a g e g e F 0) n 6) 6) 4 150) .4v (33) _ xa1,{ 0 a) (1x15) (114) (75) ?�y rcez^ (51) (32) (9) x �y IS) a g 2. 8 E 8 w) a) P - P LCITLE ST fi V 9 <J% (s2) g) (39) �lpl (72)e C )�'� / - - 3 BS ( I x 7+0 - (J3) / 1'• t (531 29 ) (54) (28) I+1) 1 ' xi) _ a (99F 7 , (881 8 1,w (i'�) R E 1,51 g (12) "J r R I (27 iel 9) E (961 w io (/ {'et (97) \•. `' g (6 ^ _ (561 - 8 (25 ) (13) n m (23) 'N (88 11 7 E g 6 1e g ,t S 3 1 8 (se) (S>) (21) (14) a (87) (87) 1 (911) , 1661 (581 g (22) (16) 3) 1. a (95) (89) 8 (6]) E (591 (21)s Its (93) (63) 1 1801 (20) S riv i4 o 1(125) itJ�s ;;) `• _ ? ,• 8 (9 +) g 1x(91) 8 (69 F s) (64) l62) . P (12fi) cssr MORNINGSIDE S px3di g an •i(1l5) . (39) t 7 1173) ,(132)V jJ01 I (]al (i5) 9 (I]) 8 (79) 8 (109) 8 (106) N.1 12 SE.1 /4 SEC This is not a legally recorded map. It represents S /-" /, S /NE /7 a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. N /SW/7 200 400 Feet Print Date: Thu Jul 11 13:2:33 20 VgCAC S/SW /7 S /SE /7 � ✓�c� �� Eighth /( A,1" 0 a. 10 ro d It Stj /0 � e .�S G _ _ - � �. I � '.lr �c � 1 rte.'- ^pia F.i �� yf�.. �.J Y.� Jr 1�i,. ..f�rjl .f.� _�'�� �, .s:� `� r.. .'y ^�����`�- � i i' _ _ /�� �t ' i , 0111�1 .10 4i Timg , \ 1t v c .art, � `?s ° �4�0:, ' � n4 +• �Ya t AFT � � 1 +tt �' R R �+� y�� 1,ty�.1���R � 2;1y��4 s��� {F,�f�,' , _ � '�`�ti4i����� �S �,,5�� + �i'Y �>. ,�b y'�''��'�•,'� ��hl� ,�ip��l' ?II 4�.` lk • +�, % 'q,.VN �)t��'•, x`,��aL�a';l�l' fi 1 , ��� '�. c �7 �'� T'' � F s f':A, jr `� �' �l ` „� ����,•� v� %�t )� y.'�I�r tit, '._�! $,,.- )��,:q: �. i � 1 � f e,�.�;i 1a ti s�, 1'� +�� i� f 1 T��f; • :i /p . ,r' :Srl�RS ,.� : tt�\ '. <.1 �,jf, / `�.i� `y �`�' •3i�a�„�!, •'f�.j"t' c l �,y m,� a•!r /r `1 W,? 1 i.�ljc > >ti :f`P* I �h \�,•t nriQJ�;�� �, I: q� 7: �py�s � r L' i �4. r - :.t j' *� qi, fib •1 f ` th .��•„t �.i!< VIM �� "'v � +�.� '!•rl 4rC i /:% f '' :t i::� ,�f i�+ 1�7.�,`•,�i,'��•� ► _ +,u kL��}'{- i \'!,'� ;(' i `as. i /'-f Ail 7 4 1 WM 0:11 Az 1 � Y }, .:a Xf on imp" gg y,.w y ffea y, •cr�v. fie f67t'i Y r q + 1 1 4 � y�• I „ r r� i. .. •' t'tYd �E�.� Y'rrtii l rrlJ.i — :Ac:, t ,) this property propowd far :max SUBDIVISION' By: Frank Sidell (952) 920-1197 for information contact EDINA PLANNING (952) 626-0369 a IlY L• �'y4� � -�^ •mss � IlY L• �'y4� % SB Infrastructure ■ Engineering s Planning o Construction & Associates, Inc. - Memorandum DATE: December 6, 2012 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Community Development Director Mr. Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering City of Edina FRom. Charles Rickart, P.E., P. T.O.E. RE: Acres Dubois Residential Development Traffic Review City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 - 36 Background 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and safety impacts the proposed development of the Acres Dubois residential development plan has on the adjacent roadway system. The site is located north of Morningside Road and west of Lynn Avenue on the border between the City of Edina and the City of St Louis Park. The existing site includes two single family residential units. One has access on the south side of the site directly to Morningside Road and the other has access on the north side of the site to Oakdale Avenue /Little Street. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed site plan includes development of eight (8) single family residential homes including maintaining one of the existing homes and the construction of seven (7) new homes. Access to six (6) of the homes will be via a new cul -de -sac street connection from Morningside Road. The one remaining existing home and one new home will have access on Oakdale Avenue/Little Street on the north end of the site. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. An alternative site plan was also considered which extends a new through street from Morningside Road to Little Street. All driveway access would be provided on this street. Figure 3 shows this alternative site layout. The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated traffic and safety impacts the proposed development will have on the adjacent roadway system. A41 Acres Dubois Traffic Review City of Edina December 6, 2012 Page 2 of 6 Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed development is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation rates used to estimate the site traffic are based on extensive surveys for other similar land uses as documented .in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition. The table shows the total daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed eight (8) signal family homes. To analyze a worst case condition, it was assumed that all eight (8) lots were new homes and would generate new trips to the roadway system. Table 1- Estimated Site Trip Generation Use Size ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Single Family Residential 8 Units 1 78 1 39 39 1 6 1 5 1 8 5 3 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Traffic Operations Analysis In order to determine a base line condition, existing traffic counts were conducted on Morningside Road and Lynn Avenue December 3rd — December 5th 2012. Based on these counts the following traffic conditions currently exist on these streets. Morningside Road Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,350 AM Peak Hour 138 PM Peak Hour 111 Lynn Avenue Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 360 AM Peak Hour 41 PM Peak Hour 31 Morningside Road is an east/west street providing local access to France Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. This type of higher functioning street will carry slightly larger traffic than a typical local City street such as Lynn Avenue. Typical local City streets will have traffic volumes ranging from 200 to 2000 vehicles per day (vpd) depending on the density of the area and its connection to other higher functioning streets (i.e. collectors or arterials). Acres Dubois Traffic Review City of Edina December 6, 2012 Page 3 of 6 The traffic operations analysis was conducted established methodologies documented in the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. The analysis techniques defined in the HCM are different for roadway segments and intersections. Roadway segment analysis focuses on the average daily volume to capacity ratio, while intersection analysis focuses on delay caused by the AM or PM peak hour critical movements. It is therefore possible to have an efficient intersection located along a poorly operating roadway segment, or a poorly operating intersection along an otherwise free - flowing roadway. Roadway segments or intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" as defined in the HCM. LOS A is. the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay along a roadway segment or at an intersection LOS. E represents the condition where the roadway segment or intersection is at capacity. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the roadway segment or intersection. At a stop sign - controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues and /or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through - street intersection. For purposes of this review, the roadway segment analysis was conducted at a planning level. The analysis consists of comparing the average daily flow rates on a roadway segments to the ADT roadway segment traffic capacity threshold volumes. A two -lane urban street with driveway and street access has a capacity threshold of 2000 vpd at LOS A and 4000 vpd at LOS E/F. The existing and anticipated (with the development) roadway segment traffic operations are displayed on Table 2. As shown on the table, both roadway segments are operating at LOS A as -they exist today and with the proposed development traffic included. Table 2 — Roadway Segment Traffrc Analysis Street Location Existing LOS Projected LOS AADT AADT Morningside Road West of Lynn Ave 1350 A 1410 A Lynn Avenue North of Morningside Rd 360 A 370 A The LOS ranges for both signalized and un- signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The threshold LOS values for un- signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. Acres Dubois Traffic Review City of Edina December 6, 2012 Page 4 of 6 Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Measures Source: Highway Capacity Manual The existing and anticipated (with the development) intersection operations were evaluated for both the AM and PM peak hours. Synchro /SimTraffic microsimulation software was utilized to model the area intersections with the peak hour counts, lane geometry, and traffic control. The results of this analysis are illustrated on Table 4. Table 4 — Intersection Traffic Analysis Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un- Signalized A < 10 < 10 B 10 -20 10 -15 C 20 -35 15 -25 D 35 -55 25 -35 E 55 -80 35 -50 F >80 >50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual The existing and anticipated (with the development) intersection operations were evaluated for both the AM and PM peak hours. Synchro /SimTraffic microsimulation software was utilized to model the area intersections with the peak hour counts, lane geometry, and traffic control. The results of this analysis are illustrated on Table 4. Table 4 — Intersection Traffic Analysis Delay and LOS = Worst case intersection movement Results of the intersection traffic analysis shown in the above table indicate that the existing intersections in the area are operating at an acceptable LOS and would continue to operate at acceptable levels with the proposed development. Traffic Safety Review In addition to the traffic operations analysis a traffic safety review was also conducted. This included reviewing the crash history in the area, reviewing the sight distance required at the new street intersection to Morningside Road and reviewing the site plan for safety issues or concerns. A+i AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Existing Projected Existing Projected Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS (sec) (sec) (Sec) (sec) Morningside Rd at 4.2 A 4.6 A 3.8 A 4.0 A L nn Ave Morningside Rd at NA NA 1.7 A NA NA 1.6 A Site Access Morningside Rd at 11.4 B 11.5 B 10.6 B 10.7 B Oakdale Ave Lynn Ave at 2.2 A 2.2 A 2.1 A 2.1 A Little St Delay and LOS = Worst case intersection movement Results of the intersection traffic analysis shown in the above table indicate that the existing intersections in the area are operating at an acceptable LOS and would continue to operate at acceptable levels with the proposed development. Traffic Safety Review In addition to the traffic operations analysis a traffic safety review was also conducted. This included reviewing the crash history in the area, reviewing the sight distance required at the new street intersection to Morningside Road and reviewing the site plan for safety issues or concerns. A+i Acres Dubois Traffic Review City of Edina December 6, 2012 Page 5 of 6 Crash History — Crash data provided from Minnesota Department of Public Safety (DPS) records from the past 10 years was reviewed for the area. Based on that review no reported crashes have occurred on Morningside Road at Lynn Ave or Oakdale Ave or between the intersections. However, just west at Ottawa Ave, an eastbound minivan sideswiped a parked vehicle in 2002. Further west, the intersection of Morningside Rd and Wooddale Ave has had 5 crashes since 2005 (3 right angles, 1 sideswipe opposing, 1 ran off road). To the east, there have been 5 crashes in the Grimes Ave area since 2002 (3 right angles, 1 head -on, 1 ran off road). Sight Distance Analysis — As -built plans for Morningside Road were reviewed to determine if sight distance would be a concern with the construction of a new intersection on Morningside Road between Lynn Avenue and Oakdale Avenue. The analysis included review both the horizontal and vertical profile of the existing roadway in relationship to the new intersection location and the speed of traffic on Morningside Road. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guidelines were used for the analysis. Two primary conditions were analyzed: The sight distance required for a stopped vehicle at the new street intersection to safely pull out onto Morningside Road — Based on the requirements a sight line of 440 feet from the intersection looking east or west on Morningside Road would be required. Looking east there is sufficient sight lines to see any oncoming vehicle. Looking west there is a crest of a hill located approximately 475 feet from the intersection. Based on this distance there is also a sufficient sight line looking this direction to make a decision to pull out from the intersection. The sight distance required to stop for a vehicle in the street turning from Morningside Road onto the new street — Based on the requirements a sight distance of 200 feet would be required to see a vehicle or other object in the street to safely stop traveling at 30mph. Traveling westbound on Morningside Road there is sufficient distance to safely stop. Traveling eastbound, a vehicle would be able to see another vehicle or object in the road at the crest of the hill approximate 475 feet from the intersection. This also is sufficient distance to safely stop prior to the intersection. Site Plan Review — The site plan was reviewed including both roadway alignment alternatives. The following should be considered: 1. With either roadway alignment alternative a stop signs should be placed on the new street approaching Morningside Road. 2. Provide a clear sight line from the intersection in both directions, keep it clear of trees or other landscaping that would be in the line of vision. 3. With either roadway alignment alternative the driveway adjacent to the new street for the existing property at 4408 Morningside Road should be realigned from Morningside Road to the new street to eliminate turning conflicts. A��— Acres Dubois Traffic Review City of Edina . December 6, 2012 Page 6 of 6 4. The roadway alignment for the cul -de -sac option has the following advantages /disadvantages : Advantages • Traffic will not be able to cut - through to the neighborhood to the north. • Only six of the eight lots will access Morningside Road directly. • Less opportunity for increased conflicts at the new Morningside Road intersection. Disadvantages • Only one access to the proposed six lots for emergency vehicles. 5. The roadway alignment for the through street option has the following advantages /disadvantages: Advantages • Two ways to access the street for emergency vehicles. Disadvantages • Traffic will be able to cut - through this new street to the neighborhood to the north. • All the new lots and potentially cut - through traffic would access Morningside Road at the new intersection increasing the potential for additional conflicts and crashes. Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the traffic review documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed development will generate 78 daily trips, six (6) AM peak hour trips and eight (8) PM peak hour trips. • Based on the traffic operations analysis the intersections and roadway segments.on both Morningside Road and Lynn Avenue will operate at satisfactory (LOS A or B) with the proposed site developed. • No crashes have occurred in the area adjacent to the site in the past 10 years. • Sufficient sight lines exist for traffic exiting or entering the proposed new street intersection on Morningside Road. • With both roadway alignment alternatives safety would be improved by relocating the driveway adjacent to the new street, installation of a stop sign for the new street approaching Morningside Road and providing a clear sight line from the intersection. • Although both roadway alignment alternatives would operate at satisfactory LOS, the cul -de- sac option would provide less opportunity for cut - through traffic therefore less opportunity for possible conflicts and crashes at the Morningside intersection. 0 Q a k w b U 0 N� \p mm 0 �4 03 w N a N U W. 40th A- > I ST. 1111 C �j >0 700 ft 1400 ti Q W Q IN G V� 2 ? w I� z o a > Y W, 42nd ST. Project Location l a a Q Q> w w G LI TTLE ST. L N z DJ W F Z U OJ O zo a U C MORNINGSIDE, o � U Cr RD. `n Z C > w > o 3aNNSQN ST. a d UJ Greek z > > a 1�� O Q W p p 7 G I A'rz"2ehaY`a' -- > o o w o W. 45th c^ F – — w w m ° a �U _ Sj ST. J > a RD. 8 >DOKSIDE a C T a ~ q �r SUNNX Sao S CIR. cc, a w W. A w w w w �F- p W. 47th ST > Y a u 42. Q' 11. w o j a a' a a tip WHITE % Q 0- -� W p z tMMNE50TA G 7 ; C d Q D DIVISION > ST. w Y Y o RD' z Q �° BRI DG ST. BRIDGE RD- o�[W48th o o w 1 0 0° Z '' o W LA. ° �G~ J� Q• �o oW ° � ° 0Q QF- a ° w �Q W z Y m 2S m z a w g ST. ER o o W. 48th S Y S l�L z o w ° w 3 > LL IR. HOLLYWOOD RD• r W000 �P� o o a a ° W. 49th ST. co w ORCHARD m z W O� oJ�iRY o CLUB RD' a lt� z LA. BLVD. > > w z m 6 w ST. w D W 7. 50 th L CL o > > > r o 1 a a J W �C ° 8C 5] st ST. w N Q© a a T. C:) o a Y W� o > ���WOODDALE LA.BRUCE W' a J 51 sN ST. SKY�.ti o W J a PNE' a Z J x m = a EDEN ° WOOD DAt PL. ao a E �4, W. 52nd ST. LINK m GL EN z . Ld ST o w a W.52nd :rd w 2 ti 53rd o ST. O w a s z p o x a z w 3 W. 53 a ST. a m x a a = z a CD H N GR EDEgNDJSo. ST. w p N MOOR N CC a /PI- Lake � > 3 W. 54th S OCjP n OOH n� ti�RICHMOND Harvey GOLF a TER. a �, a �1 U J Q pJ��rCHW000 <9 °2WI�DSOR w �R, WOODHILLN DR. oa J x W ST. f O WINDSOR AV E. o AVE. l Y a W• l 7 RNON � o > � K� a I , 1 OAK = DR. W 55 th ST. D � o � � 56thU a ti STAVE. � �J) o w Y _ > �n 0 LAK EVI Flo LEXING TON ST. Y DE �p Ca CD t C a YV ONNE TER. WI ND v� PDI:�t` F, pqq� w > AV. w w w W. 56 th . oo ST. C� a w Aqk > C a Melody 24. a °� a a PL. m p� o �NO� W 57 th ST. 23, SO UTH VI EW TOWER ST.3 3 / I W wnnn i Anm /� 1 n I ` y� > >e ��, Traffic Review Figure 1 1? Acres Dubois �.�` City of Edina, Minnesota �� Project Location Map Date: Printed. 121612017 WSB filen.ea, N:101686- 360\[.0 \E.hlbfts %1686 -36 fig-02 - Site Plon.dgn c ^M�. Traffic Review Figure 2 Acres Dubois City of Edina, Minnesota Development Site Plan a• i .•yam. •�(`:t1 ! �t f�lr t A Dater Printetlr 2/6/70D' - WS8 Fnenamer K. %01686-360 \Cad \Exhibits \1686 -36 fig-03 - Alternative Site Pian.COn - kz RI OUTLOT Traffic Review Figure 3 > e Acres Dubois City of Edina, Minnesota Alternative Site Plan 1 OTTAYlA AVE, S. S; � g1 I I I 1 I I I L Sf. ►OIDS PARK - m.e• I na I. no , ma• I rao I m.a I nv. I rbt.v E�IA , § r 1 1 I I I 1 I - � �� I � I 9e - - -l— � nw I nv I nv, 1 ne 1 e0., I � 1 ,��, 1 ma• � goAKDA�Awwe - - -- -`T PROPOSED —OAK- AKALE AVENUE I 4i I° , a I■ , I r I I iS � 9 I ffF �� 11/5/12 Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: December 7, 2012 To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Preliminary Plat for Acres Dubois Dated November 5, 2012 MEMO sy9iN��jl, to Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plat and offer the following comments: • A Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as MNDH, MPCA, MCES, and a grading permit from the City of Edina Building Department. • SAC fees will be required for this project; REC fees will not be required due to the developer installing the water main and sanitary sewer system. O A developer's agreement will be required for constructing the public utilities, roadway, sidewalk and street lights. The developer will be responsible for funding the cost of construction administration as performed by City Staff. Construction administration includes construction staking, inspection, material inspection, pay requests to the contractor, and record drawings. The developer's agreement will also include a three year minimum maintenance period for maintaining the proposed rain garden and also include the temporary use of the westerly edge of the City of Edina property located at Lynn Avenue and Littel Street. Sheet 3 — Preliminary Site Plan: • Dedicate Outlot A to adjacent properties to provide maintained boulevards. If the outlot is not dedicated then staff recommends utilizing the area to create bio - swales, which requires the creation of a homeowners association to maintain the bio - swales after the three year maintenance period. • Provide a minimum of three decorative street lights adjacent to the sidewalk. Sheet 4 — Preliminary Utility Plan: • Loop / connect water main from Morningside Road to Littel Street. • Provide additional easement for access to maintain proposed rain garden / infiltration basin located at Lot 8. • Provide storm water calculations for the project. Per the City of Edina's Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan, verify that the proposed rain garden located at proposed Lot 8 can provide a two foot clearance to surrounding structures by providing storage for a concurrent 100 - year single rainfall event or a 100 -year 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is greater. Sheet 5 Preliminary Grading Plan: • Use of City property adjacent to proposed Lot 7 will require compensation to the City, along with a restoration plan approved by the City Council. Compensation will be calculated as a temporary construction easement. Staff does not support the placement of a retaining wall at this location due to long term maintenance adjacent to proposed sanitary sewer and water main. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 Ana October 26, 2012 Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Acres DuBois Development Dear Mr. Teague We are writing today to express our viewpoint concerning the development being planned for the:Sidell property in Morningside. It is our understanding that two potential plans are being considered. One includes a cul -de -sac with six new lots originating from Morningside Road and a seventh stand -alone parcel accessed off Littel St..The other proposed plan would add a through street connecting lower Oakdale Ave. with Morningside Road and have seven new lots adjoining the west side of this new street. We would like to go on record as being deeply opposed to the through street option and in favor of the cul -de -sac option for the following reasons: 1. Traffic - a. A historical traffic flow through the neighborhood already exists and we feel adding a through street within 200 feet of Lynn Ave is unnecessary. b. The connecting through street will run along.the backyard boundaries of the houses on the west side of Lynn Ave creating additional unwanted noise and increased traffic activity. c. The number of vehicles using the six house cul -de -sac will minimize the traffic impact on the surrounding neighbors and the community as a whole d. A through street will dramatically increase the number of vehicles using lower Oakdale and completely change the feel of our neighborhood. 2. Safety - a. Vehicles using the cul -de -sac will be fewer and slower moving than those using the through street. b.. The hill that would exist on the through street creates added safety concerns due to limited visibility, excessive vehicular speeds and winter ice and snow issues. The existing, steep condition on Lynn Avenue makes it very unsafe... especially duringthe winter months. This hazardous condition should not be replicated! c. There are many young children on lower Oakdale that play in their front yards near the street. The increased vehicle traffic of a through street increases the risk of an accident. 3. Trees and Vegetation — a. The cul -de -sac option would allow many of the mature trees on this property to be saved. b. The though. street would create the need to remove almost all of the mature trees in order to build the new roadway and develop the property into suitable lots. c. The cul -de -sac design provides significantly more total landscaping area (both new and saved.existing) than the through street option. 4. Natural use of the land — a. The cul -de -sac option allows for better use of the natural contour of this property by creating two beautiful walk -out lots that utilize the natural slope of the hillside and save many of the trees. b; The through street option requires the lots to be situated across the hillside creating the need for excessive grading, tons of additional fill and the installation oflarge retaining walls. c. The connecting through street option adds approximately 7,000 square feet more asphalt pavement and 3,500. square feet more concrete pavement than the cul -de -sac option. These added hardscapes will necessitate additional roadway maintenance due to both the added paved surface area As well as the increased overall traffic usage on the through street. d. The overall layout and steep slope of the connecting through street would also produce exponentially more storm water runoff which could adversely impact the existing storm sewer system and downstream bodies of water. 5. Neighborhood Serenity a. The property as it exists today is a quiet oasis in the neighborhood. The cul -de -sac. option offers the most viable solution to maintaining this sense for the immediate neighbors and Momingside community as a whole. 6.. Sidewalks. and walkability — a. We are aware that some of the neighbors on the south side of this property feel the through street is necessary to create a sidewalk connection from Momingside Road to the open space city lot on the corner of Lynn and Littel and to 42nd Street. An existing sidewalk located roughly 200 feet east of the proposed Acres DuBois development on Lynn Ave. already provides pedestrian sidewalk access to both of these areas. b. Approximately one third of the Morningside neighborhood does not have sidewalks (42nd Street, Monterey, north Lynn, Kipling and north Grimes). Forcing a through street option'to maintain the neighborhood.feel of streets with sidewalks does not have precedence in Momingside. For the reasons stated above, we must adamantly oppose the site development plan that includes the addition of the through street. The applicant has provided a development option that is much less intrusive to the existing property, the environment, future safety concerns, and the current "feel" of the neighborhood. We trust that the City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council would appreciate this much more thoughtful approach to the redevelopment of this unique property. We respectfully ask the City of Edina to work with the.applicant toward the development option that utilizes the preferred cul -de -sac option. Sincerely, Morningside Neighbors (Signature pages attached) cc Frank Sidell Peter Knaeble, Terra Engineering Inc.: Signature lr 8 •� VA �. q �o is r; t4 /4 Address y2, �3 Ott- &-lec. 0604,04 ..A v-c 2-1 a e- 14 A-to`. A-v,, yz3 4a4,-� 4--C-. ( C �) owwvl (yp-j) L�z2s oole "tp ws.CybwA q22.4 O aZd QAkAm (-zcbe�s 4,L r�4�,f ctbr.✓le� Ale zz, 2-5f at a�u Signature 3 33. q, 35. Aja,,,Aj� 4" v LtvfNnw, Address z1goo (ti ri i- L� 2A,-J, 6" FZ;4t,:5t 4Z I I gakdAtL Avt l-v.v Owe Ec� rN A/F EOCA-/,l 42,11 L-1 NN k,� oual�r, q2d, EAviA 4-7 qaP �A James and Connie Wilde 4413 Morningside Road Edina, MN 55416 December 3, 2012 City of Edina Mayor City of Edina Council Members City of Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Subject: Acres DuBois Dear Esteemed City Leader, We are writing today to express our opposition to the proposed cul -de -sac subdivision, Acres DuBois. Morningside neighborhood has a rich history and is a unique and vibrant urban community. Morningside is not a neighborhood of suburban cul -de -sacs. Our community is platted on a grid system between 40th Street / 44`h Street / France Ave / Wooddale Ave. The first page of the preliminary plat for Acres DuBois shows a location map with circles around fourteen "cul -de- sacs" in the area, most of which are in St. Louis Park. It is misleading to point to these as precedent for the construction of a cul -de -sac in Morningside. On this map only two sites are even in Morningside, neither of which are cul -de -sacs but rather dead end streets. One site on the map is a dead end at 45`h Street that gives the community street parking and sidewalk access to Kojetin Park. This is nothing like what is proposed in Acres DuBois. Connecting streets with sidewalks benefit all community members. We, like many Morningside residents, bought our home here in part because of the sidewalks. Our family loves walking the streets of our community. The preliminary plat for Acres Dubois shows no sidewalk on Littel Street. It does include a partial sidewalk on the west side of the cul -de -sac but this ends in the middle of the circle. Ending the sidewalk creates one -way pedestrian traffic, benefiting only the residents of the cul -de -sac. We urge the Planning Commission to require continuous sidewalks along all roads in the project. We understand that development is important and inevitable, but as proposed this project displaces a great deal of cost to residents on Morningside Road only to benefit the developer. We will see increased traffic, years of construction and wear and tear on our roads, the cost of which current residents will bear. Our property value and quality of life is being robbed. This proposal seeks variance exception because three of the new lots do not meet minimum size requirements. The Conforming Concept Plan is reasonable and fits consistently in the grid pattern of the neighborhood. There is no "undue hardship" to the developer. If the developer is unhappy with the Conforming Concept Plan we implore the city of Edina to work with the developer in creating a proposal that respects the character and culture of Morningside. Could part of this land be incorporated into an expanded park utilizing the city lot on 1IPage the corner of Littel and Lynn? Using 451h Street or Bridge Street in Country Club as a model, could there be a sidewalk connecting a continuous sidewalk on the proposed cul -de -sac to a new sidewalk on Littel, thus giving all residents greater access to the city lot? There is a tremendous opportunity to create a "legacy" that the developer purports to value while respecting and enhancing the quality of life for all Morningside residents. Please do not approve this plan as submitted. Sincerely, 'Sonnie James Wilde cc: Cary Teague, City of Edina 2 1'ace Jackie _Hoogenakker From: Angela Deen <angeladeen @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 7:57 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Cary Teague; Edina Mail; Jackie Hoogenakker; David Deen Subject: Letter of Concern - Morningside Development Attachments: Letter of Concern - Morningside Development.pdf Dear Mayor Hovland, We are writing to express our concern over the rampant uncontrolled development of Morningside, which similarly plagues other areas of Edina. At the end of 2010, we bought a 1931 house on the corner of Eton Place and Morningside Rd because we were attracted to the neighborhood's charm and the friendly village that it is. However, in our first year here, we have witnessed firsthand 8 teardown /rebuilds on Morningside Rd and Scott Terrace alone. We are nothing short of appalled at the number of teardowns and newly constructed behemoths arising at an alarming rate. We cannot imagine what the long -term residents must be experiencing as streets are becoming unrecognizable (especially 45th Street). Out of this growing concern, we were amongst the large crowd that gathered at Morningside Church last Thursday, November 29th. We listened to you discuss the record - breaking rankings of how Edina residents rated their quality of life. The survey firm must not have surveyed residents in Morningside. Of course the school system is terrific, and the community of people is wonderful, but the quality of life in our neighborhood is slipping. There is an overwhelming feeling of dissatisfaction amongst our community about the BUILDER - DRIVEN construction going on. You were presented with numerous issues at this meeting about how this type of development is negatively impacting our quality of life - including: New construction reduces the value of existing adjacent homes due to lost views, poor aesthetic, etc. Sidewalks and roads are being degraded by builder traffic (yet homeowners are expected to pay for new roads themselves!) • Construction workers are urinating in adjacent yards, and outhouses nearly block sidewalks • Volume of traffic and the speed of contractor vehicles down our roads has increased • Construction noise, often beginning before 7am • Storm water drainage off of these massive homes is problematic, concern of basement flooding (huge loss of impervious surface area with 5,000 sq ft homes replacing 1,500 sq ft bungalows) • Loss of decades -old trees (The 7 lot Sidell development, "Acres Dubois," threatens to remove almost 50% of the 200 trees on the 3 acres, but that's likely a low estimate) • Loss of sunlight through existing home's windows due to towering new construction. • Loss of historic homes (e.g., 4400 Branson, original Morningside Police Chief residence, 4115 Morningside, airplane bungalow) • Loss of aesthetic ( "Acres Dubois" proposes bringing suburbia to Morningside, complete with a cul -de- sac) • New houses are "detached" from the outside community with front facing garages instead of porches, few windows, and backend living areas. • Builders push zoning to the max - building tall structures, with barely 5 feet to spare on the sides of 50 foot lots, and bulldozing mature trees, even if they are in the backyard. In some instances, approved plans have not looked like the final product built. We understand that change is imminent in any community - but this letter is directed at the builder- driven, uncontrolled, negative change. There are examples of new construction that evokes positive change - we encourage you to drive past 4307 Eton Place where the house was carefully designed by the homeowner and crafted to "fit -in" to the historic charm of the neighborhood without dwarfing and damaging its neighbors. What is the difference here? This house and others were purchased by a single family, and coordinated with a builder, in that order. Too many other houses in this neighborhood are purchased by the builder first, and then controlled by that builder to be a large size thereby maximizing the builder's profit (typically these houses sell in excess of $1M). If we wanted to move into this neighborhood today, we simply could not afford to; houses are purchased with the intent of being torn down at a whopping $400K just for the land they are sitting on. Suddenly, it's a neighborhood dominated by just a handful of builders, namely, REFINED, DAVID ALLEN, and BELLA. These houses are: - Nearly identical (can you tell the difference between 4242 and 4244 Scott Terrace ?), - Oversized (see all new construction by these builders), and - Crowded - a lawnmower cannot pass between without having to use the neighbor's yard! (Drive by BELLA constructed houses 4113 or 4213 Morningside). We fear that the proposed "Acres Dubois" Subdivision (3.1 acres on 4412 Morningside) would be a similar loss of Morningside's aesthetic. It was such a heated topic at the meeting that the pile of submitted questions could not be addressed. Thank you for volunteering to make copies of these concerns to share with City .ouncil members. If such a hugely devastating leveling of property is allowed, how could new construction be controlled elsewhere? For example, we live next door to the original Morningside Church built in 1912. As our elderly neighbor discusses "selling out," this small historic home surely would be leveled and replaced by a wall of new housing blocking our morning sunrise. You see, while the pockets of the builders are being lined with profits, the actual residents of Morningside are the big losers - all the reasons listed above are undermining our quality of life. If this is indeed the direction we're headed, where builders will simply elbow out and outbid single family buyers to take hold of this area, then we need your protection to put more comprehensive policies in place. The current state of development is threatening to forever change the face of Morningside, and the reason so many of us moved here in the first place. We advocate for controlled development that preserves the character of our neighborhood, protects our trees and waters, and promotes our quality of life. We know that you believe these values are important, and so we ask you to work with us to save Morningside. Sincerely, Dr. David and Angela Deen 4301 Eton Place vlorningside Cary Teague From: jshf <jshf @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 9:49 AM To: jhoviand @krausehovland.com; floyd.grabiel @tsi.com; Cary Teague Subject: sub division Regarding the subdivision on Morningside. High hopes that you, our elected officials and planners will not allow a cul -de -sac in our urban neighborhood-- - A cul -de -sac (with all new homes) will look and feel like a fish out of water —or some weird SET on a bad Desperate Housewives drama. If that lot must be subdivided - -- we are counting on the city to make certain that it is a through street. Having 7 more houses — average 2 cars each -14 cars — basically come out of that ONE ENTRANCE /EXIT "driveway- aka cul -de -sac" is not a good idea. We already have safety issues with that blind spot coming over the hill —to Oakdale —and now another? We also hope that some sort of guidelines will be drawn up (As far as aesthetic) —so the development blends with the rest of the neighborhood. Thank you Jilene Framke Ps —what is with the name of the subdivision? Heaven forbid is its own NAME like some strange little Plymouth/ Woodbury stand alone community... December 6, 2012 Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina Planning Division 4801 W. 500' Street Edina, MN 55424 (952) 826 -0460 Dear Cary, We are Rick and Sarah Hardy. We moved with our two school -aged daughters to Edina 2 '/z years ago from the city of Portland, Oregon where we lived in a turn of the (200) century neighborhood called Laurelhurst. Prior to moving to Oregon, we owned a home built in 1908 in the St. Paul's Macalester Groveland neighborhood. In 2010, we chose Edina because of its excellent public schools and services, its close proximity to Rick's job and to our church, and for its unique proximity to urban and suburban amenities. We are "city" people who love established neighborhoods, sidewalks, older homes; urban wildlife and an eclectic community that is organized and engaged. In Edina, Morningside is, no doubt, the right pocket for us. In January of 2011, our builder purchased a lot on our behalf from the Sidell family at 4408 Morningside Road. Throughout 2011, we planned and built our "new old" home and were delighted to take occupancy in December of 2011. In our choice of builder and in many subsequent design decisions, we made it a priority to design a home that fit the character of Morningside. Recent developments with the Sidell Family, our neighbor at 4412 Morningside Road, have commanded our attention. The Sidells have proposed a new subdivision of 7 homes including a cul de sac on the east side of their property. The proposed cul de sac runs 8.7 feet from our property, 15 feet from our home and less than one foot from and parallel to our driveway. Frank Sidell knows that we have concerns with their plan and we have asked him to reconsider a west side cul de sac. A summary timeline of our experience and good faith efforts to work with the Sidell Family is attached as Appendix A. We are compelled to take action to protect our home's safety, value, compliance with city code, and our quality of life. To that end, we respectfully express our concerns regarding the proposal for Acres Dubois at 4412 Morningside Road, Edina. 1. Adequate access to a subdivided Acres Dubois can be secured with a cul de sac running on the west side of the proposed sub - division. A number of points relating to history, safety, city code, fairness, due process under the law, and impact on residents' property values support this and are detailed in Appendix B. 2. An east side cul de sac, as proposed by the Sidell Family and under current review by the City of Edina Planning Commission, has a unique and profound impact on the Hardy Hardy Letter of Concern re: Acres Dubois residence and residents nearby, affecting our property value and quality of life. These impacts include: • Creating an unsafe intersection by placing a road within 1 foot of our driveway • Pushing our home and driveway out of compliance with city code for set backs • Risking a significant negative impact to our property value for the fiscal benefit of the Sidell Family • Imposing a disproportionate and intimate amount of air, light, and noise pollution on the Hardy home A detailed discussion is outlined in Appendix C. 3. The entire neighborhood faces the prospect of imminent and long -term heavy construction of seven new houses where today only one stands. We have concerns regarding the impact of the increased density in our neighborhood, and these are detailed in Appendix D. 4. We object to a through- street plan included, but not recommended, in the Sidell submission and our objections are outlined in Appendix E. Above all, we ask the Edina Planning Commission and City Council to make a west side cut de sac a condition of any approval of a new sub - division on the property. Frank Sidell's August 12, 2012 letter to neighbors describes the family's desire to create a positive legacy and to keep their plans " Morningside friendly." We trust his sincerity in this and our conversations with Frank and other family members to date have been open and reasonable. Similarly, the Hardy family picked Morningside for its neighborly feel. We are doing our best to work with our neighbors and our City to navigate a path that best balances the rights of all involved. Naturally, we look forward to welcoming any new neighbors who will be building their homes on Acres Dubois, just as we have been welcomed so warmly into our wonderful pocket of Edina. Thank you for your diligence in this matter. Sincerely, j �I Le I I Rick and Sar H l I l y 12� ©� /ZfjiZ 4408 Morningside Road Edina, MN 55416 (952) 486 -7658 cc Scott Dahlke, RE Frank Sidell Hardy Letter of Concern re: Acres Dubois APPENDIX A: RECENT HISTORY OF 4408 AND 4412 MORNINGSIDE ROAD We Hardys live at 4408 Morningside Road, directly east and next to Acres Dubois at 4412 Morningside Road. We have lived in our house less.than one year. The recent history of our property is relevant: January 2011: 4408 Morningside Road purchased from the Sidell Family by REFINED LLC with the express written commitment to construct a new, custom home on site for Rick and Sarah Hardy January - April 2011: Hardy home plan designed and finalized May 3, 2011: Frank Sidell Sr. of 4412 Morningside Road.passes away. Unbeknownst to the Hardy family, this event puts into motion the Sidell family plans to subdivide and develop Acres Dubois. June 27, 2011: Ground is broken for Hardy home at 4408 Morningside Road. December 15, 2011: Hardy family moves into 4408 Morningside Road. December 2011- August 2012: Frank, Tina (Rhode), Phil and Mrs. his Sidell welcome us personally to the neighborhood and we exchange contact information and pleasantries. August 11, 2012: Frank Sidell Jr. distributes a letter formally describing the Sidell family's intent to develop their property at 4412 Morningside Road. Despite summer -long rumors in the neighborhood, August 11th is the first direct word from the Sidell family to us regarding their plans Had the timeline of events for either family shifted by six months, it is likely that either of our decisions regarding the property and project would have been radically impacted. October 9, 2012: The Sidell Family hosted a neighborhood.meeting during which they revealed a drawing of their probable plan for Acres Dubois. This plan included a new east side cul de sac providing access to 6 new homes on the south end of Acres Dubois. The cul de sac is drawn directly next to and running parallel to the Hardy residence. The Hardy family was invited but not present at this meeting. October 11, 2012: Having seen the plans, Sarah Hardy called Frank Sidell to ask why the road was not planned on the west side of their lot, away fr om the Hardy home and where any new road intuitively belongs. A meeting between families is set for October 1911'. October 19, 2012: Frank Sidell, Peter Knaeble (Terra Engineering), Sarah and Rick Hardy meet at the Hardy residence to discuss the Sidell's plan for Acres Dubois. An hour long discussion is held recapping the Sidell's reasons for the east -side access plan. Hardy Appendix A Together, we walked the Sidell property. Sarah and Rick made an appeal for a west side road citing the profound and unique impact of a road within 15 feet of their home. Frank and Peter agree to "take a second look" at a west side access option. October 23, 2012: A second, larger neighborhood meeting is hosted by the Sidell Family to describe the plans for Acres Dubois. The plan presented at this meeting is the "East Side Cut De Sac" plan to which the Hardys objected on October 19th. Sarah Hardy attended the meeting and again verbalized the Hardy's desire for a west side cut de sac accessing the new lots. October 27, 2012: Sarah Hardy called Frank Sidell to request a direct response to their October 19d' appeal for reconsideration of West side access. Frank reported that the Family will not be pursuing a west side access despite the impact of an east side road on the Hardy residence. The reason for this per Frank is "we lose a lot with a west side road." December 8, 2012: Planned meeting with Frank Sidell, Rick and Sarah Hardy. Hardy Appendix A APPENDIX B: IN SUPPORT OF WEST -SIDE ACCESS TO AcRE& DUBOIS We feel that fair and adequate access to a subdivided Acres Dubois can be secured with a cul de sac running on the west side of the proposed sub- division. A number of points support this: 1. History: The original survey and vision for the neighborhood shows lot subdivision of this property with road access on the west side, Until Monday, December 3; 2012, a:portion of road right -of -way still existed on the St. Louis Park border for this purpose. "Natchez Avenue South" is shown on Hennepin County Section Map:Nl /2 SE1/4 Sec.07 T.28 R.24. Attached (Attachment 1) is a copy of a partial print of the section map with the Hardy residence, Acres Dubois development, and existing Natchez Avenue South noted. It is clear that the original intent for subdivision of the Acres. Dubois parcel incorporated access with a west side road. 2. Safety: An intersection that logically continues an existing road, where stopped traffic already pauses, is a safer place to put a new street connection to Morningside Road. A continued street coming in from the north to Morningside Road where Oakdale already enters from the south will not surprise drivers and will be no less safe than the existing Oakdale / Morningside Road intersection. 3. City Code: Section 850.08 Subd..6 part A. "General Requirements: Vehicular traffic be channeled and controlled in a manner that will avoid congestion and traffic hazards on the lot or tract or on adjacent streets. Traffic generated by the use shall be directed so as to avoid excessive traffic through residential areas." A west side cul de sac complies with this requirement, while an east side road presents potential hazards as described above and in Appendix C. 4. Shared Impact: The amount of light; noise and air pollution plus traffic congestion of a west side access into Acres Dubois is more fairly dispersed and shared by residents. St. Louis Park residents state in their recently granted petition to their City Council to vacate the .right of way for Natchez Ave South that they would be buffered by .a hillside between Hardy Appendix B them and any new prospective road on the west side of Acres Dubois. An east side road intimately and disproportionately impacts the Hardy residence and residences south of Acres Dubois on Morningside Road. 5. Property Values of affected west -side neighbors are already adjusted: Because the potential for "Natchez Avenue South" already existed (point 1, above), lots of record for residents of St. Louis Park whose homes backed up to this as- of- yet - unbuilt road had the existing road right -of -way, and the real possibility for a road, already factored into their property values. With the Right of Way vacated by the City of St. Louis Park on December 3, 2012, those property values could increase. St. Louis Park Residents' desire to have the right of way vacated supports our position that a right of way — not to mention an actual adjacent road — depletes a property's value. 6. Property Values of affected east -side neighbors are preserved: We assert that, if the City of Edina approves the plan as proposed for Acres Dubois, this is an illegal seizure of property value from the Hardy family and other neighbors to benefit a private party, the Sidell Family, without due process. A west side cul de sac avoids this unjust transfer of property value. 7. The Sidell's Plan is preserved, in mirror image: We assert that the Sidell Family does not "lose a lot" by placing the road on the west side as has been previously indicated. An overlay of a mirror -image cul de sac to the one they are proposing shows that the road and lots fit in either configuration, east or west, regardless of the challenging topography to the north end of the lot. See the attached (Attachment 2) of a West Side Street Layout drawing. Additionally, any "loss of a lot" or value for the benefactors of Acres Dubois, needs to be weighed against the loss of property value for other existing owners impacted. Hardy Appendix B APPENDIX C: EAST SIDE CUL DE SAC CONCERNS An east side cul de sac, as proposed by the Sidell Family, has a unique and profound impact on the Hardy residence, affecting our home's legality, property value and our quality of life. These impacts include: 1. Home Setback Compliance: A new road west of the Hardy home creates ambiguity around the Front or Side Street Setback Requirements for City of Edina Single Family Dwellings. Front Street Setback is required to be 30 feet. Our home and garage are built facing our current west side lot line. Any future appraiser, future buyer, and/or future building permit official could interpret that the front of our house faces west (i.e. faces the proposed cul de sac) and therefore requires a front setback of 30 feet. OR, City Code .Section 850.11 Subd. 7.A.2 and City of Edina Fact Sheet titled "Setback Requirements for City of Edina Single Family Dwellings" reads that Side Street Setback is 15 feet "but increases to front street setback if adjacent house faces side street." The Code's exception clause, and the exact interpretation of what is considered "adjacent," is somewhat ambiguous. Any future appraiser, future buyer, and/or future building permit official could interpret that our home meets the exception clause for Side Street Setbacks and therefore requires a front setback of 30 feet. This ambiguity impacts our home's compliance, value and desirability on the market, and complicates our deed and insurance requirements. 2. Driveway Setback Compliance: The east side cul de sac puts the Hardy residence driveway out of compliance with setback requirements for the City of Edina Single Family Dwelling Driveways. Per city code 1205.02 Subd. 3 "Minimum Distance to Street Intersection. The minimum distance between the driveway and the nearest return of the intersection of two streets shall be 50 feet as measured at the curb line of the street." Our driveway would be within 20 feet of the curb of the new cul de sac, an undesirable and unsafe distance that is out of compliance with City Code. 3. Air, Light, and Noise Pollution: The east side cul de sac places disproportionate amounts of light, noise and air pollution on the Hardy family. Partly due to the fact that it runs parallel to our home, but mostly due to the fact that the proposed right -of -way runs 15 feet from our home where no road currently exists, we will experience a tremendous and intimate amount of new headlight, streetlight, vehicular noise, and air pollution as a result of this new cul de sac. 4. Property Value: The plan for an east side cul de sac has already disproportionately and substantially depleted the property value of our home at 4408 Morningside Road. We did not purchase a corner lot for our home. Our home and driveway were not designed with the expectation that a road would be running directly to the west of our property. Our house currently conforms to all city codes, however if we were to try and sell our home today we would be compelled to disclose the Acres Dubois plans and their impact on our home. Hardy Appendix C APPENDIX D: DENSITY CONCERNS RELATING TO THE SUBDIVISION OF ACRES DuBOIS: While it is reasonable to expect the Sidell family to consider options for the Acres Dubois property, and Morningside is a neighborhood of higher density, the proposed plan will create an extreme challenge to the existing residents of this already developed neighborhood. The density of the sub - division creates the following concerns: 1. Construction Schedule: The demolition of one home and its outbuildings, property grading, and the construction of seven new homes, could result in years of construction nuisance to the nearby residents if not properly managed. We urge discussion of this topic upfront in the process, and accommodations be made to limit the impact to the neighborhood. Potential accommodations could include: • Reduce the number of new lots / homes • Coordinate construction on all new homes to happen simultaneously • If multiple builders are being used, require coordination among them in bringing equipment, building supplies, and high noise into the neighborhood • Limit and enforce hours of construction activity to 8:OOAM to 5:OOPM Monday - Friday with no construction on weekends or holidays. 2. Burden on Infrastructure, Streets and Sewer: More heavy machinery in Morningside takes a toll on our streets, which all residents will be assessed to upkeep. Also, will the burden of these net six new homes' plumbing and other infrastructure demands accelerate the need for repair or upgrade of Morningside's infrastructure? Will assessments be higher, and come sooner, as a result of this project? 3. Urban Wildlife, Habitat, and Green Space: Acres Dubois is a unique property in Morningside, a high- density neighborhood. Developing the property to the maximum limits of City Code will unfortunately result in the loss of precious urban green space, wildlife habitat, and trees, many of which are over a hundred years old. Has any consideration been made toward formally preserving at least a portion of this land and its unique qualities as a park or designated open space? Could one or more lot be designated or donated as " Sidell Park ?" 4. Impact to Edina Public Schools Enrollment and Cost: The proposed development will introduce six new households to the Edina Public School district. From experience, we know that the currently districted public school for the Acres Dubois address is Highlands Elementary, which is experiencing several classrooms already beyond recommended capacity. How does the prospect of six net new households that could bring almost an entire new classroom of students to Highlands fit into the district's space and expense plans? Does the City expect that property tax revenues will cover the cost of educating the new school -age residents? 5. The City's Comprehensive Plan: The proposed density will alter the character of a portion of Morningside that has been in place for decades. Inserting seven new residences into a space that has accommodated one residence for this long period arguably defies the City's Comprehensive Plan which states `Building on current efforts, the City will seek options that allow for single - family redevelopment that is sensitive to the community character and context of existing neighborhoods." Hardy Appendix D APPENDIX E: CONCERNING A THROUGH- STREET PLAN FOR ACRES IDUBOIS The option of a through - street connecting Morningside Road to Upper Oakdale / Littel Street has been raised, and supported by some residents. We feel compelled to comment against this option. We assert that the through -street plan adversely impacts us in all the same ways that an east -side cul de sac does as outlined in Appendix C, only to an amplified degree. Further, we believe that an approval of a through- street plan would be a detriment to the Morningside neighborhood and its residents given the following considerations: 1. Traffic for Close Neighbors: The traffic impact, including noise, light, and air pollution for the Hardys and neighbors on Morningside Road between Lynn and Upper Oakdale, is a major concern. Assuming ten trips per household per day, the traffic impact of six net new homes on a cul de sac entering onto Morningside road would be roughly 60 trips per day. The traffic impact of a through street would include traffic from 24 homes: the seven newly developed homes l�us traffic from the seventeen newly - connected -to- Morningside Road homes on lower Oakdale. Traffic from a through street would be minimum one half of 240 trips per day, or 120. Estimated Traffic Impact of a Through Street on Close Neighbors: • Cul De Sac = 60 trips per day • Through Street =.120 trips per day minimum Further, each of these homes does or will provide housing for citizens of Edina, and therefore we assert that more than half of their trips out each day would take them south to Morningside Road and to their destinations in Edina including schools, work, kids' activities, churches, etc. We feel confident that a cul de sac would result in a milder traffic impact for close neighbors of Acres Dubois. 2. Cul de Sac does fit Morningside: A cul de sac is consistent with the eclectic nature of Morningside and its streets. There is precedent for dead -end and cul de sac streets in and near the Morningside neighborhood, when topography or other terrain challenges seem to have necessitated a break from the grid structure. Examples in Edina Morningside: • West 451h street off of Grimes • Upper Oakdale at Branson Street There are additional dead ends and cul de sacs in Edina's nearby White Oaks neighborhood and even closer in neighboring pockets of St. Louis Park. 3. .Urban Wildlife, Habitat and Water A through street necessitates the near complete obliteration of Acres Dubois for the sake of grading the landscape and paving the road, and near twice the impermeable road surface would result. A cul de sac holds promise for at least preserving some of the existing habitat for urban wildlife and water management. 4. Some have argued that "no variances whatsoever" should be the guiding principal as city planners review the options for Acres Dubois. We disagree and feel this is a unique property, and situation, meriting special and careful consideration for the neighborhood, the habitat and landscape, and the family's legacy. Hardy Appendix E 7 2) DIN Cl. cc :3 ce) 04 (5) C 0 8 C ;T G 40 128 128 (156) 128 200 7 (114) I (75) 125 125 $---- - - - -20 (74) -LITTEL ST - - 200 (72) 0 0 0 100) (85) - - (73)���\\`� 20 126 Z5 (86) I (71) -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Existing Natchez Ave S 06 w (70) Right-of-Way 8) O - ----- - - - - -- ° (159) Proposed (127) 17 (69 - 128 IN Acres 1 0 Dubois (160) 200 la Pevelopment, (88) 1 Z Z - F 16 11 a 16 128 (96) F (68) 10 > (87) w S (161) 0 128 Z Hardy Residence 200 o t15�1 Z 11 Hardy (r, (90) (66) 128 Q 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 (162) 15 128 f95) (89) (67) 13 200 150 128., (163) (93) (63) 14 14 8 (91) - t3------- - F - - - - - - - 14_ 128 (94) 150 (115 (92) (64) 64) 40 12a 20 200 50 200 200 )F ST LOUIS PARK SD NO 283 I ---]MORNINGSIDE ROAD - - )F EDINA SD NO 27 DOC 10211XI 147.66 7 1494 941 100 100: 100 100 2 CD 2 (82) (134) :(135) 133.67 N 3 (133) (132) T. Aril (70) b 117.94' (69) F I 2 (83) (136) ^o V • 4 6. (58) F (61) (63) (64) (67) ,0 94: PART OF HENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEY 3 "GRN DIVISION SECTION MAP (84) (137) 24 \40 N1/2 SE1/4 Sec.07 T.28 R.24 4 (85) (138) 164 (y c sr s t".m - - - - - - - - - - EDINA T MORNINGSIDE ROAD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4212 z z 7 7 4Z44 L------ - - - - -- 4 - i 1211 L I r------ - - - - -- 30' FSb —1 ' I . I l.w 4101 AM A*ckweAP Z L110 ZIS eft =3 SEES c69 Egi 2[456 ,lpd- ]K See < NA 'VNI43 sloano smov 12. lV-ld ASVNIviri32Jd '273 TOD9 wei —T -- - - - - -- - - - - 4ob- IN N TIP WgI SF .ua w D- — — — — T E. — — — — — — I — — — — — - w 171' z 1-w � s H 0 22B Y Q32 12 �', 2 SF -a'. t < 'o Bow I 1710 42 1/2 ST. V1. UTTE L STREET I .2571 IV SSS l oW � elI rl 5 _LA5-E --j --= ___j 3, -181 W5 F.... 2A .?.!,9. 5F - 00 as 6 1 :2 IoK I _J2 - - - - - - - - - - - _4 -- 1 2.170 4m T-T -Qu ---------------- .257 LAY" Ina T T - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 I lis SF - - - - - - - - - - - 4- 41M - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - 42M wB so - - - - - - - - - - - 4 -411 .VOID — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — sr s t".m - - - - - - - - - - EDINA T MORNINGSIDE ROAD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4212 z z 7 7 4Z44 L------ - - - - -- 4 - i 1211 L I r------ - - - - -- 30' FSb —1 ' I . I l.w 4101 AM A*ckweAP Z 4262 < 12. '273 —T -- - - - - -- - - - - 4ob- IN TIP WgI SF 171' 1-w 12 �', 2 SF -a'. t I .2571 IV SSS TREET L --j --= ___j sr s t".m - - - - - - - - - - EDINA T MORNINGSIDE ROAD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4212 z z 7 7 4Z44 L------ - - - - -- 4 - i 1211 L I r------ - - - - -- 30' FSb —1 ' I . I l.w 4101 AM A*ckweAP Z Cary Teague From: Patrick Judge <judge5920 @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:37 AM To: floyd.grabiel @tsi.com; Cary Teague; kevin @stauntonlaw.com Cc: jhovland @krausehovland.com Subject: Regarding Edina Planning Commission and the 7 -8 lot "Acres Dubois" Subdivision Dear Mayor Hovland and concerned parties, As a resident of Edina - Morningside, I am emailing the following to express my thoughts on the proposed 7 -8 lot "Acres Dubois" Subdivision. Let me thank you in advance for considering my thoughts as you navigate the governance of this issue. I do appreciate the opportunity to provide insight on the matter in question as it directly impacts my neighborhood. My wife and I moved into Morningside a year and half ago with our two boys. Edina has a great quality of life and education to offer. Fortunately, here in the Twin Cities, there are many options for a great quality of life and education. So why choose Morningside? We chose Morningside for the character of the neighborhood. We are concerned the proposed sub - division will detract from that character. Having said that, it is important to understand, we are of the strongest opinion that new construction has a place in our neighborhood. We would never want to create a deterrent for some other couple's chance to move in to such a fine neighborhood. Our concern is centered on two things: 1) The laws or lack thereof regarding setbacks, heights, grandfathered in structures that can be taken advantage of by builders to expand the footprint of homes on narrow lots, and character preservation, and 2) The enforcement or lack there of regarding those laws. To be clear, we do not want to prevent or deter new home construction. Rather, we want to welcome a dialogue with the building community. We feel strongly this dialogue can only be effective if the Planning Commission enacts and enforces a process that allows for the Builder's adherence to the concerns of the existing neighborhood. Alternatively, the City might consider turning the property in question in to a park, library or botanical garden of sorts, maybe even a community co -op farm. Perhaps the neighborhood with the city's help can issue a municipal bond to buy the property from the owner. Edina could get great publicity for this. There is no shortage of creativity regarding what can be done with this property, and I am somewhat disappointed there is no energy coming from our elected officials to promote an alternative solution that can be a win, win for everyone. Respectfully submitted, Patrick Judge 4307 Eton Place Edina, MN 55424 Chris McClain 4043 Sunnyside Rd. Edina, MN 55424 (952) 929 -8582 December 5, 2012 Ms. Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina Planning Division 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Sidell Property Development Dear Ms. Teague: I am writing to express concern regarding the planned development of the Sidell family property on Morningside Rd. I believe that the drawbacks of the current development plan outweigh the benefits and request that the city of Edina take special note of the negative impact of the Sidell development on safety and congestion in the Morningside neighborhood. Morningside is a wonderful, tight knit neighborhood that suffers from one major drawback. Its roads are used as traffic cut- throughs between Linden Hills /Lake Harriet and Highway 100 /St. Louis Park. During rush hour in particular, cars race through the neighborhood, generating congestion, noise pollution, and, most importantly, safety concerns. I live on Sunnyside Rd., where we have already had two near misses (one with our dog and one with our five year old). The proposed development of the Sidell property adds to this problem in two ways: 1) The addition of new lots will add, in all likelihood, 12+ new cars to the neighborhood as well as new traffic from visitors, delivery vehicles, construction crews, etc. 2) Traffic from the newly developed homes will flow onto Morningside Rd. at the crest of a hill, where it will by nature be difficult to see oncoming traffic. I understand from conversations with residents who have lived in Edina longer than I have that the codes and regulations that govern development in the city may favor the developer. However, I cannot believe that those codes and regulations call for assessment of development plans solely through the lens of the developer. So, I ask that the city of Edina consider the impact of the proposed Sidell development on the well -being of all the residents of the Morningside neighborhood and not just the well -being of the Sidell family. Morningside is already plagued by traffic hazards, and any evaluation of the Sidell development plans must take this serious safety concern into account. Thank you for your time and attention. Best regards, C His cClain December 5, 2012 Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W 50`h St Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Teague: As adjoining property owners, we are writing to express our support for the proposed Acres DuBois subdivision. Although change is often difficult and our properties will be impacted by the proposed subdivision, we feel the proposed plan is the best option for the entire community for the following reasons: 1. The proposed cul -de -sac street has a much smaller environmental impact than a through street connecting Morningside Road to Littel Street. a. A through street would create approximately twice the impervious area as the proposed cul -de -sac, thus increasing the amount of stormwater runoff into the Minnehaha Creek watershed area. b. A through street would require many more trees to be removed, especially on the steep slope area on the north side of the property. c. A through street would require a much greater amount of land disturbance (cut and fill), especially in the low area where it would connect to Littel Street. Large retaining walls and /or steep slope embankments would be required to construct a road in this area. , The proposed location of the cul -de -sac on the east side of the property is the best location for access to the proposed subdivision. t a. The proposed location places the road at the crest of the hill, providing the best and safest sight distance lines for public safety of vehicles and pedestrians. b. The proposed cul -de -sac location is equal distance between the existing Morningside Road intersections with Lynn Avenue and Ottawa Avenue South. c. The proposed location places the road on high flat ground which reduces the amount of grading and ground disturbance required to construct the road and associate infrastructure. Mr. Cary Teague December 5, 2012 Page 2 d. The east side cul -de -sac option allows the developer to preserve the substantial mature tree growth located along the west and north sides of the property, where the terrain is much steeper. e. The proposed plan allows the homes to have walk -out basements. 3. A west side cul-de =sac option is not in the best interest of the entire community. a. A west side cul -de -sac location would not lineup with the existing Oakdale Avenue and Morningside Road intersection. This would create a non- conforming intersection with poor sight distance lines that would be worse for the public safety of cars and pedestrians. b. The topography on the west side of the property contains steep slopes that would require extensive tree removal, grading and potentially significant retaining walls in order to construct'the road and associated infrastructure. c. Lots created by a west side cul -de -sac would be less desirable tuck -under lots compared with walk -out basements. We feel the reasons listed above demonstrate a significant weight of evidence that the proposed subdivision plan with a cul -de -sac on the east side of the property is a much better option for the entire community than either a through- street or west side cul -de -sac layout. We also would like to express our thanks to the Sidell family and Mr. Peter Knaeble, P.E., for their extraordinary efforts to communicate with all the neighbors affected by the proposed project. Thank you for your attention to our comments. Sincerely, Michael and Katrina McDonald Jena Bjorgen and Jack Szczepek 4257 Ottawa Ave S, St Louis Park, MN 55416 4281 Ottawa Ave S, St Louis Park, MN 55416 Jeff Ziegler and Linda Ingle 4273 Ottawa Ave S, St Louis Park, MN 55416 Mr. Cary Teague December 5, 2012 Page 3 Aaron and Judi Nathenson 4253 Ottawa Ave S, St Louis Park, MN 55416 Bonnie Berg and Rick Collins 4265 Ottawa Ave S, St Louis Park, MN 55416 January 29, 2013 Mayor Jim Hoveland and Edina City Council c/o Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina Planning Division 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (952) 826 -0460 Dear Mr. Mayor and Esteemed City Council Members, We are Rick and Sarah Hardy. We own our home at 4408 Morningside Road in Edina. We are writing in response to the January 23, 203 Planning Commission Sketch Plan Review of the Sidell Family Proposal for subdivision of their Acres Dubois property, and in anticipation of City Council's Sketch Plan Review of the Sidell Proposal on February 5, 2013. Please refer to our two previous letters, dated De' ember 6, 2012 and January 18, 2013, to Mr. Teague regarding Acres Dubois. These are 'ncluded in the Planning Commission meeting materials from their December 12, 2012 and January 23, 2013 meetings. From our letters you will note that, as neighbors adjacent to the Sidell Property directly to its east, we were surprised and concerned about the Sidell's plan to install a road right next to our newly built home, thereby transforming our lot into a corner lot and imposing on us a profound nuisance. We have been evidently thus far unsuccessful in pleading with the Sidell Family and arguing compellingly before the Planning Commission for a modification to the Sidell Plan that would flip of the plan in mirror image and result in a west side cul -de -sac accessing Acres Dubois away from our home. However, we are grateful that the plans under review presently do not include a through street running next to our home, which would cause even greater negative impact. Indeed, at the December 12'' 2012 Planning Commission Review over 40 Morningside households plus 8 adjacent St. Louis Park neighbors, the City Engineer report and Traffic Sody supported a cul -de -sac over a through street for Acres Dubois. Each of the Pl4ning Commissioners who spoke at the January 23, 2013 Sketch Plan Review noted theirlopposition to a through street plan. Further, the Sidell Family and the Planning Comrxrission have been responsive to our pleas for mitigations and modifications to the original proposed cul de sac plan. Specifically, you'll note that in Mr. T eague's Staff Report for the December 12, 2012 Planning Commission Review several recomm Commission approval. These include • the deeding of Outlot A to our property • landscaping of Outlot A to mitigate roa • the re- orientation of our driveway to ad concerns. A construction management plan for the home We are counting on the City and the Sidell F for us. Also, in the Sidell "Modified Original" plan re Commission (.filename "P -3 12 -31 -12 Prelim and the road surface have been narrowed signi This set the eastern edge of the road further frc between our house and the new cul -de -sac, dai logical change for a number of additional reas( To be clear, our first choice among all options the west side of the property. Absent that, the been agreed to make the "Modified Original" conditions for Planning t 4408 Morningside Road nuisance, and -ess the cul -de -sac due to traffic safety ect in its entirety and each individual to follow - through on these mitigations :wed January 23`d by Planning Plan. "), both the road right of way intly from the December 12, 2012 plan. our home and puts a reasonable setback ming its impact on our home, and is a Acres Dubois includes a cul -de -sac on igations and modifications that have for Acres Dubois acceptable. We are also interested in having the power poles and lines that run along the eastern border of Acres Dubois buried as a part of the s division project. All of the new homes in Acres Dubois will have buried power. We be ieve that, amidst all the construction, there is an opportunity to access and remove these eyesore poles and lines, and that their burial could nvtigate the construction headaches that seven new homes will create for adjacent neighbors. We are grateful for the opportunity to voice our osition and are heartened that many of our concerns have been addressed through the our noted above. Of the three options under current consideration, we urge the City Council to support what the Sidells call their "Modified Original Plan," also labeled ,"P -3 12 -31 -12 Prelim Site_Plan." Thank you for your diligence in this matter. Sincerely, Rick and Sarah Hardy 4408 Morningside Road ly, 1 J y0 0 Le -7k J 813 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. B. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action. Discussion ❑ Date: February 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -17 Calling For A Public Hearing On A Project By Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2013 -17 Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on a Project by Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis Information / Background: Calvin Christian School issued taxable debt in 2008 for construction of an addition to the school. The School approached the City Council in March of 2008 to request the issuance of conduit debt The City Council turned down the proposal at the time and the school issued taxable debt instead. Calvin Christian School recently approached staff concerning the issuance of tax- exempt conduit debt utilizing the City of Edina to refinance its taxable debt Staff believes there is a potential that the City could issue debt approaching the $10,000,000 limit for bank qualified debt, therefore, Calvin Christian School could not issue bank qualified debt through the City of Edina. Calvin Christian School has begun negotiations with several banks and the City of Lilydale for the issuance of tax- exempt bank qualified debt, however, as the project was within the City of Edina, The Edina City Council would need to hold a public hearing for the City of Lilydale to issue the debt The attached resolution was drafted by Calvin Christian School's Bond Counsel Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith and Frederick, PA.. A letter from the School's consultant Steve Fenlon of Midwest Healthcare Capital with introductory remarks regarding the Calvin Christian School request for the public hearing is also attached. The City would have no financial responsibility with the issuance of the debt being proposed. Attachment: Letter from Midwest Healthcare Capital, Calvin Christian School's consultant, with introductory remarks regarding their request for a public hearing. Resolution No. 2013 -17 Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on a Project by Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MHC Nonprofit Tax- Exempt Finance Specialist 2042 Charlton Ridge W. St. Paul, Minnesota 55118 Office (651) 455 -8300 Cell (651) 308 -0949 Email: steve (amidwesthealthcarecanital.com To: John Wallin Cc: Randy Kroll From: Steve Fenlon Date: 1/23/13 Re: Introductory remarks regarding CCS request for public hearing Calvin Christian School ( "CCS ") has operated its school at its present site for more than 50 years. CCS is organized (under the auspices of the IRS) as a 501(c)3, nonprofit corporation as a school. As such, and subject to the close scrutiny of bond counsel a study has been undertaken to review the 2007 construction expenditures specifically allocating the costs to the spaces which serve as educational, administrative and athletic to ensure no issue with the "separation of church and state." As a qualifying nonprofit CCS has a right to access tax - exempt financing for qualifying spaces and original construction costs. CCS and Midwest Healthcare Capital have requested and obtained lending proposals from three area banks: one has been selected as the most attractive and a commitment is expected in the next few days. Refinancing at this juncture with low interest rates further reduced due to the tax - exempt, bank - qualified loan structure makes eminent sense in helping CCS continue to offer private school educations at reasonable tuition rates and still pay teaching staff a livable wage. CCS consulted with the City of Edina several months ago and learned at that time, the City intended to issue more than $10 million in bonds in 2013, which would prevent CCS' note from receiving a bank - qualification designation. Since that designation is commonly a requirement in order to attract a bank lender, and since CCS has structured its offering assuming a bank lender, it pursued another issuer under the MN statute which allows for a nexus issuer, that is a community for whom its citizens benefit from the availability of the educational opportunities offered to students at CCS. The City of Lilydale has tentatively agreed to issue the note, of course subject to a public hearing being held by the City of Edina and the adoption of a resolution by the Edina City Council expressing the Council's consent. Therefore, we hereby request that the City of Edina hold the mandatory jurisdictional public hearing, and after that hearing and during the same meeting, consider and approve a resolution instructing the City of Lilydale to issue its tax- exempt, bank - qualified note which will refinance the existing long tenn indebtedness of Calvin Christian School. The City of Edina's role in this transaction does not call for it to actually issue the note but is rather limited to holding a public hearing and directing the City of Lilydale to issue its note. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Calvin Christian School (campus does not include a church) has been a solid citizen in Edina and has provided an educational alternative to the citizens of Edina and south Minneapolis. CCS thanks the City of Edina for considering this request and expects that the City will take this step (one which does not result in risk or cost to the City) in recognition to the contributions CCS has made in assuring a broad and diversified educational opportunity to the citizens of Edina. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-17 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROJECT BY CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF MINNEAPOLIS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: 1. Authority. Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A., bond counsel ( "Bond Counsel ") has advised the City that Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, as amended (the "Act "), authorizes a city to issue revenue obligations to refinance indebtedness incurred by an organization engaged in providing educational activities as an elementary, secondary or postsecondary school. 2. The Project. Representatives of Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis (the "Borrower ") have represented to the City that the Borrower is a Minnesota nonprofit corporation and organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, engaged in providing educational activities as an elementary, secondary or postsecondary school. Representatives of the Borrower have further advised the City that the Borrower desires to refinance taxable indebtedness incurred for improvements to the Borrower's kindergarten through eighth grade, 172 - student, school campus located at 4015 Inglewood Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, consisting of: (a) constructing and equipping an 8,600 square foot addition to the existing main school building to provide a new lobby, media center (incorporating a library, computer lab, office and conference room), office suite (including a reception area, three administrative offices, a nursing office, a workroom and two single -stall restrooms); (b) constructing and equipping a 1,075 square foot addition to the west building to provide including a new entryway, a hallway and boys' and girls' restrooms; and (c) related renovation to existing areas to provide a staff room, a learning resource room and a tutoring room in the City (the "Project") and paying costs associated with the refinancing. 3. Financing, Powers Agreement. a. The Borrower desires to finance the Project through the issuance of tax- exempt revenue obligations (the "Obligations ") of the City of Lilydale (the "Issuer "). b. The Borrower has further requested that the City consent to the issuance of the Obligations by the Issuer to finance the Project pursuant to the Act. 4. Public Hearing. a. As the Project is located within the City, the City will conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. b. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause the notice substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be published in the official newspaper of the City and a newspaper of general circulation in the City not less than 14 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date set for the public hearing; provided that if the official newspaper of the City is a newspaper of general circulation in the City, the notice may be published only once. 5. City Costs. The Borrower has agreed that it will pay, or, upon demand, reimburse the City for payment of, any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project and the issuance of the Obligations, whether or not the Project is carried to completion, or the Obligations are issued. 6. Rights Reserved. Nothing in this resolution shall be construed as an indication of an intent to approve this Project and issue the proposed obligations. The Council specifically reserves the right to approve or disapprove the request after said public hearing. Passed and adopted by the City Council on February 5, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 5, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Notice is hereby given that the City Council of City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") will meet on Tuesday, March 5, 2013, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as reasonably possible in the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing to consider giving approval to the issuance by the City of Lilydale (the "Issuer ") of revenue obligations, in one or more series, under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165 (the "Act "), in order to finance the cost of a project located in the City. The project will consist of refinancing taxable indebtedness incurred for improvements to Borrower's kindergarten through eighth grade, 172 - student, school campus located at 4015 Inglewood Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, consisting of: (a) constructing and equipping an 8,600 square foot addition to the existing main school building to provide a new lobby, media center (incorporating a library, computer lab, office and conference room), office suite (including a reception area, three administrative offices, a nursing office, a workroom and two single -stall restrooms); (b) constructing and equipping a 1,075 square foot addition to the west building to provide including a new entryway, a hallway and boys' and girls' restrooms; and (c) related renovation to existing areas to provide a staff room, a learning resource room and a tutoring room in the City and paying a portion of the costs associated with the financing, in the maximum amount of $1,500,000 (the "Project ") all on behalf of the owner, Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation and organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Borrower "). The total amount of the obligations to be issued presently being estimated at not to exceed $1,500,000. The obligations and interest thereon shall not be payable from nor charged against any funds of the City or the Issuer (together, the "Municipalities ") other than revenue pledged for the payment thereof, nor shall the Municipalities be subject to any liability thereon. No holders of the obligations shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the Municipalities to pay the obligations or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the Municipalities. Such obligations shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Municipalities, nor shall the same constitute a debt of the Municipalities within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitations. A draft copy of the proposed Application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, except legal holidays. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above or may submit written comments to the City Clerk in advance of the hearing. EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall located at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on Tuesday, February 5, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: and the following members were absent: MOTION: Member moved to adopt Resolution No. , entitled "Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on a Project by Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis," the reading of which had been dispensed with by unanimous consent. SECOND: Member RESULT: On a roll call vote the motion was carried. Ayes: Nays: Not Voting: Absent: M: I DOCSV 699510000011 ROL I / 08557501. DOCX To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 5, 2012 Subject: Hello Pizza, 3904 Sunnyside Road, Liquor Licenses cn , o 1RRR Agenda Item #: VIII. C Action — Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Motion approving New On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Licenses to Grey Ghost Grub LLC dba as Hello Pizza at 3904 Sunnyside Road the period beginning February 6, 2013 and ending March 31, 2013. Information / Background: Grey Ghost Grub LLC dba as Hello Pizza, at 3904 Sunnyside Road has applied for new on -sale wine liquor and 3.2 beer licenses. This space was previously occupied by Franklin Street Bakery. Grey Ghost Grub LL has filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the license. The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation. Attached is Sgt. Tim Olson's memo stating the findings of the Police Department's background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSE Establishment: Hello Pizza License: On Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor On 12/20%12, The Edina Police Department was forwarded an City of Edina application for an On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. The application was submitted by Grey Ghost Grub L.L.C. dba: Hello Pizza. Hello Pizza is a new business and will operate its establishment at 3904 Sunnyside RD, Edina MN. Grey Ghost Grub L.L.C. is formed or authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of Minnesota. Grey Ghost Grub L.L.0 is curie_ fitly active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. According to documents submitted by Hello Pizza's owner, Ms. Kim, Hello Pizza/Kim has scheduled an alcohol awareness program for her staff which will he held on February.4'r' 2013 Owners /Partners /Members Hello Pizza / Grey Ghost Grub LLC: Eun K Kim (aka Ann Kim) Edina, MN The owners /partners /members have been investigated and werer found to have no criminal records. Checks were made with the following agencies. NC1C MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling EriforcementDivision Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, l found nothing to prevent Grey Ghost Grub L.L.C. dba: Hello Pizza from obtaining an On -Sale Intoxicating & On Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. I would_ support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. i gt. Tim Olson # 142 �-+ 0 N C�RI'ORA'S less To: City Council Agenda Item #: VIII. D. From: Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager Action Discussion ❑ Date: February 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Neighborhood Boundaries and Names and The Related Neighborhood Association Policy Action Requested: • Adopt the neighborhood boundaries and names proposed by the Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee • Adopt the Neighborhood Association Policy Information / Background: The Name Your Neighborhood project started in January of 2012 and was led by the Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee — a group of residents appointed by the City Council to facilitate resident input in the identification and naming of neighborhoods. Committee members were Hope Melton (chair), Dick Brozic (vice chair), Bruce Carlson, Bright Dornblaser, Laura Ericksen, Rob Erickson, Paula Harter, Jennifer Janovy, Bob Miller, Bob Moore and Gene Persha. The Committee gathered input through a community -wide written survey and three community meetings held May 30, July I I and.Sept. 12. The Committee presented its final recommendations at the December 4, 2012 Council work session. At the same work session, staff reviewed a draft policy for neighborhood associations. A revised version of the policy incorporating Council input is also attached. A public hearing was held on the proposed neighborhood names and boundaries and the proposed neighborhood association policy at the January 22 Council meeting. Attachments: • Neighborhood Association Policy Summary of Community Feedback Received Since January 22, 2013 Public Hearing • Maps of Proposed Neighborhood Names and Boundaries City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 /f Neighborhood Association Policy Definitions Neighborhood. A geographic area defined by the City that exists as a sub -area within the City as a whole. Each property within the City resides within a single neighborhood. Neighbors. A group of residents or legal entities who own or occupy property within a neighborhood. Neighborhood Association (NA). A voluntary neighborhood -based organizatL:i, recognized by the City, and in compliance with this policy. Purpose ... The City encourages the voluntary formation of NAs for the purpose of facilitating communication between residents, City staff and officials, fostering interaction between individuals on issues of common geographic concern and building a better community through cooperative action. In keeping with this philosophy, the City will seek to notify and consult with NAs on matters of neighborhood interest. NAs will be notified when: • Significant neighborhood projects are being discussed or proposed such as street reconstruction, park development or redevelopment or land use planning. • A mailing goes out to residents in the neighborhood related to a City matter or public hearing. • A developer requests a neighborhood meeting for the purpose of sketch plan review. • The City is seeking to organize a neighborhood group for resident input. Expectations The following expectations exist with respect to NAs: • NAs will be included in the public input process but will not be assumed by City officials to speak on behalf of all neighbors and will not limit the ability of any person or entity, including non - recognized neighborhood groups, in participating on their own behalf. Communication with the NA will not replace the City's traditional methods of direct outreach to residents. • NAs are strictly voluntary and no neighbor will be required to join. Each NA will determine its own priorities and desired level of activity. • NAs will not assume the role of an administrative or legislative body. NAs have no legal authority to enact or enforce property design or maintenance requirements. Only one NA may exist in each neighborhood. Bylaws In order to be recognized as a NA by the City, neighborhood associations are required to adopt bylaws that include the following elements: • An outline of the neighborhood boundaries as defined by the City, Membership criteria allowing any neighbor over the age of 18 the right to belong and to vote. A statement that the association will not discriminate based on race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, familial status or national origin in connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public services, credit and education, • A minimum of one annual meeting each calendar year and a requirement that the time, place and purpose of the annual meeting be well publicized, including notifying the City 21 days in advance of the meeting, • Procedures for the election and removal of officers, • Number of members required for quorum and how votes are taken and recorded, • A defined method for maintaining contact with association members and the City, and • A statement of compliance with this policy. Changes or amendments to the bylaws should be forwarded to the City staff liaison. Recognition A group of neighbors intending to form a recognized neighborhood association must notify the City staff liaison. The recognition steps are as follows: • An educational meeting may be conducted, upon request, by the City staff liaison. • The City notifies, in writing, all neighbors of the opportunity to vote on becoming a recognized neighborhood association and the proposed neighborhood association bylaws. • After an affirmative vote, the association formally applies for recognition and submits a completed recognition application and minutes from the meeting during which the neighbors voted to seek recognition and a copy of the current or proposed association bylaws. • The City staff liaison will forward the application materials to the City Manager for review and approval. The City Manager will notify the association and City Council of his or her decision with regard to recognition in writing. Associations can appeal the decision of the City Manager to the City Council. Removal of Recognition The City Manager has the authority to remove recognition from a NA if the association fails to comply with any requirement of this section. Prior to the removal of recognition, the neighborhood association will be given written notice of non - compliance and a period of 60 days to correct the issue. If the City Manager removes recognition, the neighborhood association and City Council will be informed of his or her decision in writing. To regain status, the neighborhood association must reapply for recognition. Funding Membership fees, when established by the bylaws of a NA, shall be voluntary and not preclude any neighbor from participating in the NA. Neighborhood associations may charge fees for events or activities that do not include voting on association business. The City shall not serve as the fiduciary agent for a neighborhood association. Any association which raises money outside of a city- sponsored grant or program is responsible for complying with applicable state and federal laws. If funds are disbursed by the City for use by an association, the association may be required to provide documentation of appropriate use. Failure to do so will result in removal of recognition. City Staff Liaison The City will provide a staff liaison to recognized neighborhood associations. The role of the staff liaison will be to: • Provide information about the role and organization of NAs, both generally and in direct consultation with residents, • Receive and process applications for recognition, lA • Ensure that the recognition requirements are met and notify the associations and City Manager of any shortcomings, • Maintain records related to NAs, • Work with the Communications and Information Technology Services Department to facilitate the communication activities outlined in this policy, • Develop and maintain a City speaker list and contact speakers upon request from a NA, • Educate City staff on the role of NAs and how to fully engage NAs as a valued resource, • Refer issues brought forward by NAs to appropriate staff, and • Advise the City Council on issues related to neighborhoods or NAs and draft or revise related policies. It is not the role of the City staff liaison to organize a neighborhood on behalf of a proposed NA or to advocate positions on behalf of NAs. Communication Support The City's Communications and Information Technology Services Department will provide basic communication support to NAs to ensure that residents are aware of their existence within the community. The City shall not serve as the primary communication vehicle for neighborhood associations. The City encourages the use of social media as a relatively inexpensive and easy way for associations to promote communication between neighbors. Basic communication support from the City includes: • Landing page on the City's website: The landing page will include the neighborhood boundaries and notable features, bylaws, regular meeting place and time and neighborhood contact information. The page can also link users to a NA website or other online resource. Due to the volume of potential requests, City staff will not be able to customize the landing page to include updates about upcoming events or to post other documents. • Neighborhood -wide postcard mailings: The City will facilitate a neighborhood -wide postcard mailing notifying residents of a meeting to vote on the potential formation of a recognized neighborhood association. Content must be delivered to the Communications and Information Technology Services Department at least 21 days in advance of the meeting date to ensure timely delivery. Postcard mailings will be addressed to "Resident ". • Copying Services: The City will provide copying annually for each association in an amount equivalent to the neighborhood's estimated population (double- sided, on 8.5" by 11" paper). Associations should anticipate a 2 -3 day turnaround for each copying project. Associations can maximize the copy services provided by the City by using half sheet flyers. • Neighborhood listings: Active neighborhood associations and their contact information will be highlighted annually in About Town. Communication with the NA will not replace the City's traditional methods of direct outreach to residents. Any communication facilitated by the City is subject to the City's communication policies. As a result, the City will not facilitate any communication that is inconsistent with its policies or general operating principles. Examples of communication that would be inconsistent with City policies include items that are discriminatory or politically partisan in nature. s Neighborhood Name Changes The City has defined names for each neighborhood. NA's may apply to change the name of the neighborhood within one year of recognition. After one year, the name of the neighborhood and corresponding NA cannot be changed. To apply for a name change, the NA must submit a request to the City staff liaison to change the neighborhood name along with the minutes from the meeting at which the organization's members voted to change the name and a summary of how the association collected data regarding the name preference of their neighbors. The City staff liaison will forward the request to the City Council for review. The City Council has the authority to approve or deny the change. Neighborhood Boundary Changes The City has defined boundaries for each neighborhood. NAs may propose both technical corrections and neighborhood boundary changes. Technical Corrections. Technical corrections are minor changes regarding the placement of the boundary line on the map. For example, a technical correction could entail shifting a boundary line to include the properties on both sides of a street. Technical corrections impact a small number of properties. To apply for a technical correction to a neighborhood's boundary, the NA must submit the request to the City staff liaison along with the minutes and sign -in list from the meeting at which the organization's members voted to make the change. The City staff liaison will forward the request to the NA(s) of any adjoining impacted neighborhoods for review and comment. The City staff liaison will forward the request and any comments from the adjoining impacted NA(s) to the City Council for review. The City Council has the authority to approve or deny the change. Boundary Changes. Boundary changes represent a larger change with respect to the geographic definition of the neighborhood. Boundary changes have the potential to impact a large number of properties. For example, a boundary change could entail moving the boundary from one street to another street located a few blocks away. In light of the significant public input process conducted by the City to arrive at the current neighborhood boundary map, the City will not consider boundary changes for a period of three years following the approval of this policy. For a change to be considered after that period, all of the neighborhoods impacted by the proposed change must have an active NA. To apply for a neighborhood boundary change, all of the impacted NAs must submit the request to the City staff liaison along with the minutes and sign -in list from the meeting at which the organization's members voted to make the change. The City staff liaison will forward the requests to the City Council for review. The City Council has the authority to approve or deny the change. Guest Speakers The City will develop and maintain a list of City staff that can be scheduled as guest speakers by NAs. City staff may be available to speak on special topics by request. The guest speaker program is designed for education and information sharing purposes. Meeting Space Meeting space owned by the City and available for public use will be made available to NAs for meetings or events free to the public at no charge. If City staff are required to open or monitor the building, a recovery fee may be charged. City- sponsored meetings and programming will take precedent over NA meetings, and NA meetings may be "bumped" from a City facility with a minimum notice of one month. Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:49 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood Naming Initiative Input Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. '= 1 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist -..1,+ 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Rob Webb [mailto:rob.webb1998 @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 11:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Naming Initiative Input Dear City Council, city staff and Name Your Neighborhood Committee Members: As many of you know, I have been meaningfully involved in the Country Club neighborhood for the past ten years. As a strong believer in neighborhoods as a critical building block to strong communities, I applaud the Name Your Neighborhood committee, city council and city staff's efforts to contribute to stronger neighborhoods in Edina. We are thankful to have such 'a proactive and forward thinking city! While I do not represent the Country Club neighborhood residents, I do make efforts to share information with the neighborhood, and to collect input. I have communicated with many residents about the Name Your Neighborhood initiative, and a basic survey of residents was conducted. I was unable to attend the public hearing due to out -of -state travel for work, but I have some input to share on the initiative. Overall, my recommendation is to allow the committee more time to complete the project for three reasons: l) I think it is important that the committee have time to talk to some of the existing neighborhood "associations" to gather input. At this time, I know that, at a minimum, the committee has not had time to talk to the current organizers of the Country Club and Sunnyslope neighborhood groups. I believe that valuable tput could be provided by discussing this initiative with people that have decades of experience establishing and maintaining neighborhood groups in Edina. Over the past ten years, in the Country Chub neighborhood, we have been able to establish a monthly neighborhood magazine named Country Club Life that provides neighborhood news, we have over 90% of the homes on a neighborhood email list with regular communication, a published directory is issued to 100% of the homes each year, over 60% of the homes contribute $40 or more for community activities each year, and several hundred people attend the major neighborhood events throughout the year. We have learned a lot over the course of our history about what works, and what doesn't, and we'd be happy to share that with the committee. Based on what I've read, the current policy runs the risk of doing as much harm as good, and we would like to contribute our knowledge so that the objectives of the initiative can be fully achieved without the risk of some pitfalls that we have observed. 2) The current policy, as read by me and many others, runs the risk of extending and complicating the city government in Edina. I believe that the committee needs to think more deeply about the risks of some of its recommended policies. The concept of requiring neighborhood associations to be elected by residents, is viewed by many as an unnecessary additional layer of representation and politics being imposed on our neighborhoods. I assume elected neighborhood officials is a requisite to allow the neighborhood associations to represent the neighborhood residents on city matters such as long -range planning, street redesign, zoning and other matters outlined in the Name Your Neighborhood materials. For many residents the idea of elected neighborhood officials in not appealing. Residents would like to elect our city council and from there represent themselves fully, as individual residents of Edina, not as a resident of a neighborhood. The current policy says that individual residents can still represent their views, but the point is that the residents don't want anyone from the neighborhood, elected or not, representing their views to the city officials or staff on any matters, not long - range planning, not zoning, not street redesign, etc. While it could be appealing and convenient for the city to have a sub -set of residents to engage on key matters, it is not desired by many residents. They look to the council to serve this function. To provide some data on this matter, in a survey of Country Club residents, 85% of respondents answered no when asked, "I agree that another layer of politics and representation is needed in Edina, and that elected neighborhood officials should represent resident interests on city matters such as long -range planning, zoning changes, street redesign, parks, etc." 90% answered no to the question, "I agree the city of Edina should expend resources -- including staff time, copying, and mailing costs - -to establish and support elected representatives in Neighborhood Associations." 97% answered no to the question, "I am interested in being involved in neighborhood politics i.e. running for an elected position within the neighborhood association." As you can directionally see from the survey responses, an important tenant in the Country Club neighborhood "association" is that the group does not make any attempt to represent the neighborhood, but simply act as a conduit for communication and collecting input. With today's technology an association can help the neighborhood have a voice without having representation of its residents by an elected few. This would suggest a neighborhood policy design that does not include elected representatives, but may include providing neighborhoods with communication tools, and survey or other input collection tools. Again, more time will allow the committee to think about the ability to use technology to achieve the objectives. The idea of more elected officials seems to take us backwards, not forwards in this age of technological advancement. If the Name Your Neighborhood committee would have talked to the Country Club organizers, they would hav heard that we believe that elected officials will not resonate with many neighborhoods, and Country Club appears to be one of them from the information collected to date, and from our experience with the residents. The Country Club group, because it is not an elected group, is very inclusive. Anyone can volunteer, and anyone can contribute without fear of neighborhood politics or formality. Each year we get a new mix of people contributing. This structure has worked for our neighborhood so far, and what we're hearing froin residents is hat the current structure of the Name Your Neighborhood policy seems to threaten a structure that we value, and the "don't attempt to represent the residents" key tenants that has made our neighborhood work so far. 3) The current naming and geographical boundaries for the neighborhoods concern many residents. Perhaps this is more data to support that more time is needed for the committee to do its work. I believe that more time to interact with the neighborhoods could have uncovered some of the dissonance with the proposed structure. A few phone calls between the organizers in Country Club and Sunnyslope got to an agreed point of view that would likely be supported by the neighborhood residents. By rushing this process, we are missing this type of input, and it led to a recommendation that is out of alignment with what the residents want. In the survey, 94% of respondents answered no to the question, "I am in favor of defining our neighborhood as the `Greater Country Club' neighborhood, which includes Country Club, Sunnyslope, and elements of 44th Street and 50th Street." Overall, I applaud the efforts regarding neighborhoods in Edina. Like anything, the "devil is in the details ", and everything is a double -edged sword —what can be positive also holds the potential to be quite negative. To achieve the benefits, and avoid the potential downsides of the neighborhood initiatives, I think additional care needs to be taken to avoid imposing an additional layer of representation and politics on our neighborhoods, to get the input from the people that have worked on these neighborhood associations for years /decades, and to be sure that we get the geographical designations as well aligned as possible. Anything worth doing is worth doing right, and more time would benefit this initiative greatly. Thank you for all the efforts to make Edina a stronger community. 1 look forward to contributing in whatever way possible. Sincerely, Rob Webb 4516 Drexel Avenue Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 9:30 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Naming of Neighborhoods Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. := Lynette Biunno, Receptionist `!IC' i`i,:; 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(a)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov - ...For Livin;;, Learning, Raising Families &- Doing Business From: Tom Lohmann Lmailto :trl(&pinehurstprops.coml Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 9:24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Naming of Neighborhoods City Council, It appears as though a committee has been coming up with new names for neighborhoods which don't need new names i.e. "Greater Country Club ". It sounds like, Greater Minneapolis and St. Paul, not a neighborhood name with history or reference, but a geographical delineation. Rolling Green becoming Interlachen seems to be a reference to the country club by the same name. Does everyone in Rolling Green belong to Interlachen? Perhaps we could open the process to the neighbors themselves and enable them to deal with the issue. By the way, what's wrong with the original name Sunny Slope? Does Rolling Green need a new name? Does it have negative connotations the way it is? Seems like a committee run amok. a Thomas R. Lohmann Principal 612- 929 -0007 Ariel Klugman "rom: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:52 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Sunnyslope Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 1� 1_ 952- 927 -88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ( ` Ibiunno(a)EdmaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, l�arninr, ltai;inr } an�ilie: , l7uing Business From: Kathy Bailey [ mailto :kbailey924(abcomcast.netl Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 6:30 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Sunnyslope As residents of Sunnyslope, changing us to "Greater Country Club" would be like changing St. Paul to "Greater Minneapolis ". We are 2 completely different and divided (by water), neighborhoods. Please reconsider your grouping of the two distinctly different neighborhoods. We are, and will always be Sunnyslope! Bill and Kathy Bailey 4808 East Sunnyslope Road Edina, MN 55424 Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:46 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood names Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 -927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tom Jones fmailto:tomnrenex.usl Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 3:28 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood names They are what the legal says they are,(with minor exceptions). Leave "brands" that have earned enhanced reputations, or possess certain characteristics ( planned. by their builders, developers and homeowners) be left alone. This waste of time creates confusion, fails to differentiate, where many neighborhoods possess differentiation. 49 year 4 neighborhood resident and over 3 decades of residential real estate. Tom Jones Sent from my iPhone Ariel Klogman rom: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:24 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood name changes Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cr�.EdinaMN.gov www.EdiiiaMN.Qtov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Polly Holley jmai Ito: ppholIey@rnac.coml Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 7:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood name changes This is such an unnecessary exercise in "waste of time ". For those of us who grew up here, this idea is preposterous. Why change a good thing ? ?? I disagree wholeheartedly with this movement by a few!!! Why do some people think that CHANGE is a "better" idea ?.... As I see it, it only adds to the confusion of life! Polly Holley Sent from my iPhone Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:24 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nname change Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno a,EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Helene Haugland jmailto:dou .hau Ig and@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 6:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Nname change We have lived in Sunnyslope for 51 years we are proud of our neighborhood Association we do not want. A name change Thanks Doug and Helene Haugland Sent from my Wad Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:29 PM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed Neigborhood Agglomerations & Name Changes Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �(: I 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 ; /. Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov 1 - f-or Lining, Learning, R aising Families & Doing Business From: Sara McGrane [ mailto:saramcgrane @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:06 PM To: john @currieworks.com; Edina Mail Subject: RE: Proposed Neigborhood Agglomerations & Name Changes Dear Mayor Hovland: It has been many years since we crossed paths on a case in North Dakota where I was representing the ND Board of Medical Examiners, and you were representing a physician. It was so much fun this year when my kids were paying attention to all of the political yard signs. While they were getting caught up in which party each candidate was for, I was encouraging them to look at the person behind the party. It was even more fun that I could tell them that I actually knew our Mayor - -had a case against him, and that he is a very good person. John and I do not agree on everything (I think we live in a McMansion that he frequently writes about), we do agree 100% on the importance of Sunnyslope neighborhood staying Sunnyslope. We moved to Edina in 2008, and while we looked in the Country Club area as well, we decided on Sunnsylope because of the larger lots and rolling landscape. We were truly amazed when we moved into our home and found this wonderful neighborhood -- people throw welcome to the neighborhood parties, folks get together on the corner on Friday afternoons in the summer, and when one of the kids have a lemonade stand (as both of mine frequently do), almost everyone stops. It is a truly special place, with a small /special identity, and an amazing sense of community. We hope that you will support our wonderful small, diverse and special neighborhood keeping its identity as such. Thank you for your consideration. Sara (Gullickson) McGrane From: john(abcurrieworks.com Subject: Proposed Neigborhood Agglomerations & Name Changes Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:44:03 -0600 CC: sunnyslopedirectory(a)gmail.com; andy.faris(a>hardware.com; hfarisO)comcast.net; barbhegenes(a)comcast.net; Anne Whitsitt(@yahoo.com; Bill Whitsitt yahoo.com; bails(e) prodigy. net; kbailey924@comcast.net; blwesten(cbmsn.com; lisakanderson@hotmail.com; bruce.gustafson @ optum.com; cyndi.gustobt gmail.com; bwilkinson(a)csc.com; iessica .wilkinson(a)hotmail.com; Sheilah PeseUDyahoo.com; dan@ctiresources.com; danadokman(a)aol.com; rlehmann @umn.edu; tomcousinsft.com; shelle shirleyhouse.com; dave(aenglerstudio.com; linda(a)engler- tudio.com; lakecarlson(a)msn.com; msparano(ogmail.com; gobli006 @comcast.net; delundstrom(abieee.org; hauglandhp(�Iaol.com; duanebarnes(d)comcast.net; teresaabarnes(a)comcast.net; mag_gie.knack comcast.net; gregm(abprojectconsultinggrou .com; saramcgrane(a)hotmail.com; hank(alianinc.net; wendy.doster(a)yahoo.com; sirijguit(a>aol.com; amydurtschi001@)comcast.net; j_ Clairmont @engIish roses uites.com; delia00I(d)comcast.net; vogllaw(a)aol.com; mschell(a)sheltercorp.com; Icarlsonschell (&sheltercorp.com; barryeilers(abmac.com; joejasper(a)visi.com; kellyjasper(a)visi.com; micurrie mmm.com; ipduffey(a)msn.com: Katie. m. boylan(abgmail.com; katy.lebarron(i>comcast.net; kevin carlson(duhc.com; sprmm4@)aol.com; hegmanmark(a)aol.com; jzgutowicz(a)gmail.com; mzqutowicz(abyahoo.com; melodybaron(cbyahoo.com; nanc ..sparanoCd)gmail.com; vjbrunsvold(abaol.com; donna kmcc(a)gmail.com; Bpallazza@)hotmail.com; julievessel@yahoo.com; paul vessel(JIyahoo.com; alkelly84(cbgmail.com; raykelly84(d)gmail.com; robbranton(6hotmail.com; scarlettbranton(a)yahoo.com; marsha119432(a)msn.com; bobrmkPlive.com; becky.6grady(obgenmills.com; shawn.ogrady(,agenmills.com; lisa.sporcich(a)oracle.m: scott. sporcich (athecreativepartnersgroup.com; stansuz(a)usfamily.net; aisha(abgillett.org; buss.steven(a)gmail.com; erin.buss(a)gmail.com; jgrangaard(a)msn.com; stevedietrich(ablive.com; karine.watne(atoro.com; steve.watne(a)allianzlife.com; kahogan(Dcomcast.net; tedmhogan@gmail.com; Kristen krush(a)hotmail.com; Tomnconner((Dyahoo.com: barbpederson @com cast. net; topederson(a)comcast.net; IwickbergOmindspring.com; gigginkelPgmail.com; woody(abginkelproperties.com; frict001(aumn.edu; lewis g sandy(a)uhg.com; kathymsandy(a)yahoo.com; amakrC&msn.com; curriewrks(cb ol.com To: mail@)EdinaMN.gov Mayor Hovland; I am John Currie, a resident of Sunnyslope, and one of the six people who took the opportunity to address the Council last night in the matter of the neighborhood associations. Thank you for your attentiveness to the community and our opinions during the City Council meeting. I imagine that presiding over the bunch of us and our individual concerns and opinions is not unlike herding cats, so your patience is appreciated. I do not want to see our neighborhood name changed, formally or informally. I respect the efforts of the volunteer community who took on the task of reviewing the matter, and the time that they invested, but I heartily disagree with their recommendations. As it relates to Sunnyslope directly, we are an established neighborhood, with an unofficial but well - established Sunnyslope neighborhood Association that pre -dates my move to Edina in 1994. Our association collects voluntary dues from each family each year, publishes our own neighborhood directory, and organizes at least two neighborhood get - togethers annually: Summer and Winter Holiday. And in the past few months, when one of our families suffered a tragic death, and when the Kirsch family outside of our immediate neighborhood lost their dear son, we came together as a neighborhood to reach out to these families. We are an active, vital neighborhood. While we recognize that we do actually exist as some part of Country Club, no one really feels a part of that community, and as we heard last night, Country Club doesn't see us as a part of theirs either! (Of all the nerve...) We don't need a new name. We don't need to have an identity created for us. We have both already, and are happy, content and proud of our little sequestered community. The natural borders of the creek, Hwy 100m and 50th Street rather instinctively define and embrace us, and create for us a foundation for the small neighborhood that we are. We welcome new residents, and always will, although I personally will grouse and complain about the influx of McMansions which are stomping into our neighborhood. Yuck. In the larger picture, I feel that the size of our neighborhood is perfect for meeting the City's goals of fostering relationship and a sense of community between a given neighborhood's residents. When I see neighborhoods of 500 and 800 homes, I can't imagine how they can have the same sense of familiarity and comfort, one with the other. I suppose that their residents are comfortable with what they already have; it is just not how I imagine the scale of a neighborhhod to be. I also think that neighborhoods such as Sunnyslope, who already have associations and established identities, should be respected for our up -by- our - bootstrap efforts and recognized as we already are and not asked to become something other. I am certain that there might be ways that we can make ourselves more easily reachable by the city in matters of community communication, and am equally certain that we will be open to any further suggestions and discussion of how that might be effected. I have asked other residents to contact you, so if they do so, you can either thank or curse me, at your pleasure... Regardless, I remain a happy resident of Sunnyslope and Edina, and look forward to seeing you from behind the wheel of my WWII jeep on July 4th. Best Regards, John Currie 4929 W Sunnyslope Road Edina, MN 55424 9ohn(cr- currieworks.com +1 952 928 3017 www.currieworks.com www.brandsculpt.com www.mediarevolutiongroup.com www.fineart.currieworks.com www.dailypaintersofminnesota .blogspot.com http://scuIr)torsinternationa1.blogspot.com/ Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:13 PM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Sunnyslope Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov - ...Fi>r Living, Learning, Raisin, Faroilie-� & Doing Eiusinc�5s From: Shawn O'Grady [ mailto : Shawn. OGrady(sllgenmiI Is. com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:48 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Becky O'Grady Subject: Sunnyslope Mayor Hovland, My wife and I are residents of the Sunnyslope neighborhood (and past residents of the Country Club area). I have been made aware of the current discussion regarding the "renaming" of the neighborhoods. My wife and I have enjoyed both of our experiences in Edina neighborhoods. One of the most enjoyable parts of Edina is being part of the larger city, but also being more closely knit to our smaller neighborhood. We would ask that you continue to protect that by not supporting the current movement. Thank you again for your service to the city and for listening. Shawn and Becky O'Grady 4907 E Sunnyslope Rd. Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:11 PM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood Associations Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. r Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 7I� ! 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 l 4 IbiunnorcEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov 1-or Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing I3usines> From: W. James Vogl, Jr. jmailto:jvogl @bgs.coml Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:17 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood Associations Mayor Hovland, First of all I would like to say hello again and thank you for your service to our community. A number of years ago, I had worked with you and your wife on the issue of sound walls for our neighborhood. Unfortunately, it didn't work out for me and my immediate neighbors on West Sunnyslope but some of my neighbors north of me enjoy a little less noise due to their new sound walls. The reason I am writing is the issue of Neighborhood Associations ( "NAs "). I am somewhat confused as to the reason for some of the discussions I am hearing from my neighbors. I have lived on West Sunnyslope for about 21 years. I am aware that our neighborhood legally is part of the Country Club district even though most long time Edinans refer to us as the Sunnyslope Neighborhood. It is my understanding that the City of Edina is going through some kind of process in which more formal NAs are being established. I'm not clear on the purpose of this or how this will affect us. How would declaring us part of the Greater Country Club district affect us? Would this mean that our neighborhood would be subject to majority rule on matters of public works etc with the rest of the Greater Country Club NA? Please fill me in. As you know, our neighborhood is distinct and secluded due to the boundaries of Mill Pond, Hwy 100 and 50th street. The Sunnyslope NA has been a long established informal organization which was formed before I moved here in 1992. In Sunnyslope due to seclusion we have distinct needs and wants. For example, due to our layout we decided against sidewalks a number of years ago. We do not get much traffic outside of our neighbors and thought it important to keep our quaint streets without sidewalks. This desire might not appeal to places that have more traffic. Personally I love the neighborhood. The only issue in my mind is the proliferation of McMansions. There have been 15+ new (or significantly remodeled) houses built since I've been here. It has changed the character of the neighborhood from a 40's era neighborhood to a hodgepodge of new and old which is in my opinion is less appealing. I suspect that I would be against being added to the Greater Country Club NA if it means that it diminishes our ability to work with the City on issues that are distinct to our neighborhood, however, if this is really only about a name and bein , kept informed through formal NAs then I don't have a problem since no matter how we are designated Edinans will call us Sunnyslope, like they always have. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or comments. Jim Barna, Guzy and Steffen, Ltd. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Blvd. Mpls., MN 55433 -5894 763- 783 -5163 fax 763 =783 -5109 9vogl@bgs.com CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any advice contained in this e-mail (including any attachments unless expressly stated otherwise) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. CONFIDENTIALITY: The information transmitted herein is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information, proprietary and /or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, distribution or other use of or taking any action in reliance upon this information is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail en error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the message and all copies. Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:09 PM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed Neigborhood Agglomerations & Name Changes Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...for Living, Learning, Raising families 8: Doing Business From: John Currie [mailto:john @currieworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 11:44 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: sun nyslopedirectory @gmail.com; andy.faris @hardware.com; hfaris @comcast.net; barbhegenes @comcast.net; Anne_Whitsitt @yahoo.com; Bill_Whitsitt@yahoo.com; bails @prodigy.net; kbailey924 @comcast.net; biwesten @msn.com; lisakanderson @hotmail.com; bruce.gustafson @optum.com; cyndi.gustobt @gmail.com; bwilkinson @csc.com; jessica.wilkinson @hotmail.com; Sheilah _Pesek @yahoo.com; dan @ctlresources.com; danadokman @aol.com; rlehmann @umn.edu; tomcousins @q.com; shelley @shirleyhouse.com; dave @englerstudio.com; linda @englerstudio.com; lakecarlson @msn.com; msparano @gmail.com; gobli006 @comcast.net; delundstrom @ieee.org; hauglandhp @aol.com; duanebarnes @comcast.net; teresaabarnes @comcast.net; maggie.knack @comcast.net; gregm @projectconsultinggroup.com; saramcgrane @hotmail.com; hank @ianinc.net; wendy.doster @yahoo.com; sirijquit @aol.com; amydurtschi001 @comcast.net; Jayne Clairmont; delia001 @comcast.net; vogllaw @aol.com; jimschell @sheltercorp.com; IcarlsonschelI @sheltercorp.com; barryeilers @mac.com; joejasper @visi.com; kellyjasper @visi.com; mjcurrie @mmm.com; jpduffey @msn.com; Katie. m.boylan @gmail.com; katy.lebarron @comcast.net; kevin_carlson @uhc.com; sprmm4 @aol:com; hegmanmark @aol.com; jzgutowicz @gmail.com; mzgutowicz @yahoo.com; melodybaron @yahoo.com; nancy.sparano @gmail.com; vjbrunsvold @aol.com; donnakmcc @gmail.com; Bpallazza @hotmaii.com; julievessel @yahoo.com; paul_ vessel @yahoo.com; alkelly84 @gmail.com; raykelly84 @gmail.com; robbranton @hotmail.com; scarlettbranton @yahoo.com; marsha119432 @msn.com; bobrmk @live.com; becky.ogrady @genmills.com; shawn.ogrady @genmills.com; Iisa.sporcich @oracle.com; scoff. sporcich @thecreativepartnersgroup.com; stansuz @usfamily.net; aisha @gillett.org; buss.steven @gmaii.com; erin.buss @gmail.com; jgrangaard @msn.com; stevedietrich @live.com; karine.watne @toro.com; steve.watne @allianzlife.com; kahogan @comcast.net; tedmhogan @gmail.com; Kristenkrush @hotmail.com; Tomnconner @yahoo.com; Barb Pederson; topederson @comcast.net; Iwickberg @mindspring.com; gigginkel @gmail.com; woody @ginkelproperties.com; frict001 @umn.edu; lewis_g_ sandy @uhg.com; .kathymsandy @yahoo.com; makredes; John Currie <curriewrks @aol.com> (curriewrks @aol.com) Subject: Proposed Neigborhood Agglomerations & Name Changes Mayor Hovland; I am John Currie, a resident of Sunnyslope, and one of the six people who took the opportunity to address the Council last night in the matter of the neighborhood associations. Thank you for your attentiveness to the community and our opinions during the City Council meeting. I imagine that presiding over the bunch of us and our individual concerns and opinions is not unlike herding cats, so your patience is appreciated. I do not want to see our neighborhood name changed, formally or informally. I respect the efforts of the volunteer community who took on the task of reviewing the matter, and the time that they invested, but I heartily disagree with their recommendations. As it relates to Sunnyslope directly, we are an established neighborhood, with an unofficial but well - establishes. Sunnyslope neighborhood Association that pre -dates my move to Edina in 1994. Our association collects voluntary dues from each family each year, publishes our own neighborhood directory, and organizes at least two neighborhood get - togethers annually: Summer and Winter Holiday. And in the past few months, when one of our families suffered a tragic death, and when the Kirsch family outside of our immediate neighborhood lost their dear son, we came together as a neighborhood to reach out to these families. We are an active, vital neighborhood. While we recognize that we do actually exist as some part of Country Club, no one really feels a part of that community, and as we heard last night, Country Club doesn't see us as a part of theirs either! (Of all the nerve...) We don't need a new name. We don't need to have an identity created for us. We have both already, and are happy, content and proud of our little sequestered community. The natural borders of the creek, Hwy l 00m and 50th Street rather instinctively define and embrace us, and create for us a foundation for the small neighborhood that we are. We welcome new residents, and always will, although I personally will grouse and complain about the influx of McMansions which are stomping into our neighborhood. Yuck. In the larger picture, I feel that the size of our neighborhood is perfect for meeting the City's goals of fostering relationship and a sense of community between a given neighborhood's residents. When I see neighborhoods of 500 and 800 homes, I can't imagine how they can have the same sense of familiarity and comfort, one with the other. I suppose that their residents are comfortable with what they already have; it is just not how I imagine the scale of a neighborhood to be. I also think that neighborhoods such as Sunnyslope, who already have associations and established identities, should be respected for our up -by- our - bootstrap efforts and recognized as we already are and not asked to become something other. I am certain that there might be ways that we can make ourselves more easily reachable by the city in matters of community communication, and am equally certain that we will be open to any further suggestions and discussion of how that might be effected. I have asked other residents to contact you, so if they do so, you can either thank or curse me, at your pleasure ... Regardless, I remain a happy resident of Sunnyslope and Edina, and look forward to seeing you from behind the wheel of my WWII jeep on July 4th. Best Regards, John Currie 4929 W Sunnyslope Road Edina, MN 55424 john -currieworks.com +1 952 928 3017 www.currieworks.com www.brandsculpt.com www. mediarevolutiongroup.com www.fineart.currieworks.com _ www. dailypaintersofminnesota .blogspot.com http:// scuIptorsinternationa1 .blogspot.com/ Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:00 PM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood name change Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kelly Jasper [mailto:kellyiasper@.visi.comj Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 11:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood name change Greeting, We are writing to request that our neighborhood keep the name "Sunnyslope ". It has been our neighborhood's name and served us well for years. We as a neighborhood identify with the name, and the community as a whole knows the Sunnyslope name and neighborhood as well. The Sunnyslope neighborhood and name is well established, and happily so - so why confuse things or cause upset by changing it? Sincerely, Kelly and Joe Jasper 4812 Woodhill Way Sunnyslope Neighborhood 4952.926.2626 Sent from my iPhone Ariel Klugman From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:19 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Name Your Neighborhood Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist IE?'; 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 b1 Ibiunno(oEdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.pov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing Business &. From: Caroline Correia (_mailto:carodeg(alhotmail.coml Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:47 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Name Your Neighborhood Members of the Town Council, I have only been a resident of Edina since the Spring, so I feel I can provide a "newcomer's" voice. (Although I know, even if you have lived here over a decade, you're still considered a "newcomer. ") What attracted my . family to Edina was (in order): the excellent schools, the convenient lifestyle, and the strong sense of community. I can't understand why you would want to tamper with something you are already doing SO well with the "Name Your Neighborhood" Initiative. Is this idea addressing a problem I am not aware of? Otherwise, it seems an utter waste of time and resources. I feel it could have the potential to break the town into various voting blocs. It also adds an unnecessary extra layer between the individual voter and the town government. Edina already offers individuals various means to communicate with the town government. The website is user friendly and there are multiple ways to have your opinion on various issues conveyed. I am absolutely NOT interested in the "Greater Country Club Neighborhood Association" communicating on my behalf. I think this could be quite problematic — again — I envision voting blocs — where individual voices are ignored in favor of the sanctioned neighborhood association. In addition, as a homebuyer who is new to the area, all of these neighborhood associations would have been be a turn -off to me. This is a whole city, not a selection of various neighborhood factions. It feels very contrived. In Country Club, there exists a wonderful sense of neighborhood and pride. But, this came about organically, from the residents, not from the Town Government setting guidelines and implementation. One need just walk around any neighborh god in town and see the multiple "Edina Hornets" apparel to know that we all have "Edina Pride." I have livid on both the East and West Coasts, and what Edin;:. has is unique and wonderful. Again, I question the need for this initiative, the costs, and the possible negative impact. Thoughtfully, Caroline Correia - 4515 Drexel Avenue R [��Y Morningside - Est! Pop: 1852 Est Parcels :i700 dil L Greater Country Club p -. Presidents Interlachen; w ;_ Est Pop: 1972 Whitegaks Est Pop: 919 .. -Est Pop: 474 d Est Parcels: 692 Est Popi 422 Est Parcels: 437 --- Est Parcels: 208 '•Todd Park Est Parce�s: 179 ,�.._ Est Pop: 1168 Est Parcels: 399 50th., d France '''+• ,� E'!&op: 47 '4Est' Parcels: 41 "'" "'Arden Park L.L. Grandview -- �""�,� A t Units: 54 'Est-Pop: 1102 _f Est Pop: 1336 1 Est•Parcels: 368 Est Parcels 29 - .� --- rj Parkwood Knolls¢' Golf Terrace o �I Est Pop. 2429 p a ,^ Est Pop: 1012 l - Est Parcels: 1825 "°" Est Parcels: 350 9 Highlands ~ Fox Meadow Est Pop: 1089 ya" \ 'Est'Pop: 687 Est Parcels: 386 C" `, Minnehaha Woods �.. Est Parcels: 273 �- � _ Est Pop: i100 Z. Est Parcels: 407 �Z i Melody Lake " r� Est'Pop. 1100 1 • ~ _r N --- / - Est Parcels. 402 I Chowen Park I Pame a Parr nn Est Pop: 1897 LJ Es�Pup: 13 9� Est Parcels: 837 ' tl \ Es arcels: �27 , t Countryside n I ,' Est.Pop:'2134 = Londo �derry Est Parcels: 866 Concord - I /�1 Strachauer. Park Est Po 1503 / d` ` ..Birchcrest i:Est Pop: 1'530 ��• � '. ;Est Po 822 P Est Pa .6e 411 �'-•� p' - Est Pop: 1079 Est Parcels: 586 Est Parcels: 310 r Est Parcels: 399 Normandale Park o.rw. Est Pop: 1411 _ ! Est'-Parcels: 468 �►• Creek Valley India - ills Est Pop: 355 -- EstPo '915 Est Parcels: 1 I? ; Est'Parcels: 370 w _ Southdale . Brookview Heights Est Po 2008 The Heights Est Pop: 931 Est 'Parcels: 120 T ' Est Pop: 1037 take Cornelia _ Est Parcels: 361 Est Parcels: 352 Est Pop; 1667 1 ` YM. "• �\ o Est` Parcels: 654 ,Indian Trails % \ 4s Est`Pop• 515 -- Est Parcels: 1'95 Pro ienade Est p: 1007 Prospect Knolls Est rcels:27 Est Pop: 1259 9 South Cornelia Est nits: 1049 Est Parcels: 380 Est.Pop:.1403 Braemar Hills Est Parcels: 482 Est Pop: 724 �' Cahill I ,W Est Parcels: 311 o Est Pop:!0 Lak� Edina ' Edinboro'gh C -, Est Parcels; 102 Est PoB��j 8 ;Parklawn Est'•Pop: 125 /EstRarcels 25 Est Pop: 1133 Est Parcels: 53 Est Parcels: 42 Est Units: 1701 wey41.11 - Est Units: 450 t Pop: 13 -� --- Est,Parcels: 38 Pentagon Park Cen den is Lak s �•---�-- Est Pop: 0 E t P` 21 t ; 'Est Parcels: 36 Est �'ar S. 1 a= A. w91/� \1'L o e w 0 may° Neighborhood Communities Visit SpeakupEdina.org To provide additional feedback N W E S Engineering Dept October, 2012 I Presidents i Est Pop: 919 Est Parcels: 437 Sh�p'dor dx I dle L.du,n Interlachen Est Pop: 474 Est Parcels: 208 .l- .A._I i �'� I" I l ,I Fox Meadow Est Pop: 687 Est Parcels: 273 1 ' rI.Highldnds Est Pop: 1089; Est Parcels: 386 y,_ Cobntryside coos EstP'op- 2131°� Esf Parcels: 866 Couwn'vdc School f: I� 0. Todd Park Est Pop: 1168 'Est Parcels: 399 in � �Grandvi,w ) I -' I', i Est Pop: Est Parcels: 29� i. - Public Our Lady or I Gm Church �.. & School ` ter; �I HighWd / School L. Melody ,Lake -�, Est Pop: 1.100 Est Parcels: 402 mi Birchcre'st " �� Est Pop: 1079 Est Parceis6.169 , :Mud Lake Co-W Firc Church Slnlion i SI Alhons lr MCI, (w9` e A. NW Neighborhood Communities ly Visit SpeakupEdina.org To provide additional feedback 114 W E S Engineering Dept October, 20 "' A L. Culvin .` chrissin 1 I Gold - Ycros _ Monlcssor MornLUgside Est ,P,dpT IS62 'Est Parcels: 700 S '1:• _ - f Its LYE• /f�,- `I -�' �- = I_ L -•'. __ iv,�,lt Greater Country Club srP�P-. 22 Est Pop: 1972 Est �dr 'el :179 Est Parcels: 692 — -- - T 50th nd France oral 1 I Pop: 47 ..rein, i E0 Parcels: 41 l I co.rar l Estunits:54 cdy - M _r x.Jl c E Xroen Park Est Pop: ,11102 _. Golf Terrace Est Parcels: 368 Est Pop: 1012 _Ch—h ' Est Parcels: 350 i / r Colon. i•a,k Oapn,l Normsndolc el�ln�mm. Soudivicsc Jr High Edina Communily Ccnmr -.. F1 Concord - Iul School i l Edina. ' Com oily L.11 —an Church Minnehahaa Woods Est'Pop: 1100 Est Parcels: 407 Pamela Park Est Pop: 1329 'Est Parcels: 527 a cl—h R School Chowen Park Est Pop` 1897 Est Parcels' 1!Lli _y Strachauer Park Concord Est Pop: 822 Est Pop:1530 . , Est Parcels: 310 Est Parcels: 586 I Pamc 0 a la w9 ' , NE Neighborhood Communities 4 � �� ay Visit SpeakupEdina.org "MIT, To provide additional feedback N W E S Engineering Dept October, 2012 Good Crossr ten.' -_ ^„ M Lutheran ",y/i - _ `A Normandale. Park creek v.He, Est Pop:-1411 r SCIMI whead St�P _ Arro snnGn ' _ E arcefs• 468 C:116- take Creek Valley -- Est Pop: 355 Est Parcels: 165 Indian Hills Est Pop: 915 - Est Parcels: 370 Ed— High _.._. School The Heights vane,• v e, Est Pop: 1037 StAlwn: ,r High Est Parcels: 361 Brookview,Heights Indianhead Epiwop "I _ Est.Rop; 931, Like Est Parcels: 352' cmholic r (� 1OGt Indian Trails Est Pop: -515. - i r Est Parcels: `195 __ r 111 I Prospect Knolls Est Pop:j 1259 EsUParcels:380 0 o � I Braemar Hills a Est Pop: 724 vs Est Parcels: 311 �; i• a: - Cahill , D-° Est Pop: 0 f v • f ___ co, Est Parcels: 102 U' - ewey, H it 1. : _ Est Pop ;13,79 - 1 N�.. Wk cry Estl Parcels. 0 -I I o e � SW Neighborhood Communities 0 �, �y Visit SpeakupEdina.org •"� To provide additional feedback N W E S Engineering Dept October, 2012 n riry ucr AI Lake .... Cornelia - 1 Lake Cornelia Est Pop: 1667 Est Parcels: 654 Christ Presbyterian Church i -- Cornelia School 1 I \ ti - - -I South Cornelia Est Pop: 1403 Est Parcels: 482 Lake i Edina — Lake Edina` Est Pop: 578 Est Parcels: 255 Parklawn Est Pop: 1133 Est Parcels: 42 \ / --- Est Units: 450 i Pentagon Park Est Pop: 0 Est Parcels: 36 Southdale Est Pop: 2008 Est Parcels: 120 I Promenade Est Pop: 1007 Est Parcels:27 Est Units: 1049 ire Station Edinborough Est Pop: 1125 entennial to [ Est Parcels: 53 Est Pop: 0 Est Units: 1701 Est Parcelsf'112j Est Unitst JJ o e w9` SE Neighborhood Communities e � �, �0 Visit SpeakupEdina.org To provide additional feedback N W F S Engineering Dept October. 2012 WDQ�� DC�Oo 100 w9�A,1 U) Ay' 0 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Scott Neal City Manager . Date: February 5, 2013 Subject: CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT �O �y u f,roRppliAT� o lees Agenda Item #: VIII. E. Action Discussion ❑ Information p Action Requested: Approve proposed employment agreement with City Manager Scott Neal. Information / Background: Attached is the proposed employment agreement that we discussed and tentatively agreed to at my 2012 performance review on January 29, 2013. If adopted by the Council at the February 5 Council meeting, the effective date of the agreement will be January 1, 2013. City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into effective this 5`h day of February, 2013, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Employer "), and SCOTT H. NEAL ( "Employee ") The parties agree as follows: 1. POSITION. Employer agrees to employ Employee as its City Manager and as the Executive Director of its Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Employee agrees to serve in the positions in accordance with state statutes and City ordinances and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Council shall from time to time assign. 2. TERM AND TERMINATION. The term of this Agreement shall be two (2) years commencing on the effective date of this Agreement, which shall be January 1, 2013. Nothing in, this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the Employee to resign at any time during the term of this Agreement by giving notice and otherwise complying with the conditions set forth in this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the Employer to terminate the services of the Employee at any time, at the sole discretion of the Employer, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 3. PENSION PLAN. - Employer shall contribute to PERA as required by State law for Employee or an alr:rnate pension plan, if selected by Employee, as authorized by State law. 4. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Employer agrees to conduct an annual performance review of the Employee during January of each year. The review shall be in accordance with specific criteria developed jointly by the Employer and the Employee. Such criteria may be added to or deleted as the Employer may from time to time determine in consultation with the Employee. The Employer shall provide the Employee with a written performance review and provide adequate opportunity for the Employee to discuss the review with the Employer in closed session, as allowed by Minnesota State Statutes. The failure of the Employer to conduct the annual review shall not affect the parties' respective rights to terminate this Agreement or any other rights in the Agreement. 5. SALARY. The annual salary of the Employee shall be determined by mutual agreement of the Employer and the Employee, and subject only to the terms of this Agreement, and the Minnesota local government employee salary cap (Minn. Stat. 43A.17). Subject to receiving satisfactory performance reviews by the Employer, the Employer and Employee mutually agree to following: A. Effective January 1, 2013, the Employee's annual salary shall be adjusted to $156,043; and, B. Effective January 1, 2014, the Employee's annual salary shall be adjusted to 98% of the local government employee salary in effect on that date; provided that said adjustment shall not exceed the indexed salary cap adjustment factor computed by the Minnesota Department of Management 2 and Budget for the purpose of the annual adjustment to the local government salary cap (Minn. Stat. §43A.17) on January 1, 2014; and, C. Effective January 1, 2014, the difference between the Employee's 2014 annual salary and the local government salary cap shall be paid to the Employee in the form of deferred compensation through a lump -sum contribution to the Employee's ICMA -RC 457 deferred compensation account. 6. PAID LEAVE. Employee shall earn paid sick leave at the rate of 3.69 hours per payroll period and paid vacation leave at the rate of 6.15 hours per payroll period. The Employee shall accrue no more than 600 hours of paid sick leave and no more than 400 hours of paid vacation leave during the term of employment. 100% of Employee's accrued paid vacation time and no more than 50 % of Employee's accrued paid sick leaves are compensable at severance, subject to the terms of section 15 of this agreement. Employee shall have the option to reduce hours of paid leave by converting it to cash compensation no more than twice each year at the Employee's then hourly rate of pay in increments of no less than hour 40 hours and no more than 120 hours. Employee shall be entitled to paid holiday leave, bereavement leave, leave without pay on the same basis as the City's Department Director employees are receiving on January 1, 2013. Any future changes to the City's paid leave policies shall not change the level of benefit for the Employee, unless the parties so agree. Employee shall be credited with having completed sixteen (16) years of employment with the City upon his first day of employment, November 8, 2010. 3 7. BENEFITS. Employer shall pay 100% of the cost to provide hospital, medical and dental insurance to Employee and his dependents under a plan offered to other employees. Employer will not fund other employee benefits for Employee or fund Employee's participation in the City's Cafeteria Plan. If Employee wishes to receive other benefits including life insurance and disability insurance Employee must pay 100% of the cost. In the event the Federal 2012 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires the Employer to change, modify or amend its current employee hospital, medical and dental insurance program, Employer shall not to reduce the cash value of this benefit to the Employee. In support of the Employee's general health and wellness, Employer agrees to pay the Employee's costs for an annual membership at the Southdale YMCA. 8. DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS. Employer shall budget and pay the professional dues, subscriptions, and travel and subsistence expenses for Employee which are deemed reasonable and necessary for Employee's continued participation in national, regional, state and local associations necessary and desirable including: International City /County Management Association, Minnesota City /County Management Association, National League of Cities and the League of Minnesota Cities. Employee shall use good judgment in his outside activities so he will not neglect his primary duties to the Employer. El 9. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. After the completion of three years of employment, Employer agrees to provide the Employee the opportunity, at Employee's discretion, to attend the International City /County Management Association's Senior Executive Leadership Institute (ICMA -SEI) at the University of Virginia's Darden School of Business in Charlottesville, Virginia. Employer agrees to budget and pay for all expenses related to Employee's attendance at the ICMA -SEI, J.,cluding tuition, books, materials, travel and lodging. 10. CIVIC CLUB MEMBERSHIP. Employer recognizes the desirability of representation in and before local civic and other organizations. Employee is authorized, at the Employer's expense, to become a member of such civic clubs or organizations as deemed appropriate by Employee and Employer, including, but not limited to, the Edina Chamber of Commerce and the Edina Noon Rotary Club. 11. AUTOMOBILE. Employee shall be reimbursed for the personal use of his automobile on City business on a per mile basis in accordance with IRS regulations. 12. WORK TOOLS. Employer agrees to provide Employee with contemporary technology devices such as a mobile telephone, computer and other devices which are, in the judgment of the parties, necessary to accomplish the work of the Employee. Employer acknowledges the Employee may make regular personal use of the devices. Employee recognizes that devices and tools provided to the Employee by the Employer under this section of the agreement are and remain property of the Employer. Employee agrees to return said property to the Employer no later than the Employee's final date of employment. 5 V. 13. GENERAL EXPENSES. Employer shall reimburse Employee reasonable miscellaneous job related expenses which it is anticipated Employee will incur from time to time when provided appropriate documentation. 14. HOURS OF WORK. It is mutually understood the Employee is a FLSA- exempt employee without set hours of work, but is expected to be available at all times and to engage in those hours of work, subject only to illness, injury and scheduled annual vacations, that are necessary to fulfill the obligations of the City Manager's position. It is understood that the position of City Manager requires attendance at evening meetings and occasionally at weekend meetings. It is understood by Employee that additional compensation and compensatory time shall not be allowed for such additional expenditures of time. It is further understood that Employee may absent himself from the office to a reasonable extent in consideration of extraordinary time expenditures for evening and weekend meetings at other than normal working hours. Employee may engage in teaching, consulting, speaking or perform other non -City connected activities for which he is compensated without consent of the Employer provided the activities do not diminish the Employee's ability to perform the essential duties of the City Manager position, as described in sections 1 and 14 herein, and provided the activities do not conflict with the interests of the Employer. Employee agrees to provide written notice to Employer of activities conducted under this paragraph. rel 15. TERMINATION BENEFITS. In the event that Employee is terminated by the Employer during such time that Employee is willing and able to perform the duties of City Manager, then in that event, Employer agrees to pay Employee at the time of receipt of his last pay check a lump sum cash payment equal to six (6) months aggregate salary and to continue to provide and pay for the benefits set forth in paragraph 9 for a period of six (6) months following termination. However, in the event Employee is terminated because of his malfeasance in office, gross misconduct, conviction for a felony, or conviction for an illegal act involving personal gain to Employee, then Employer shall have no obligation to pay the termination benefits. If Employer at any time during the employment term reduces the salary or other financial benefits of Employee in a greater percentage than across - the -board reduction for all non -union employees, or if Employer refuses, following written notice, to comply with any other provisions of this Agreement benefiting Employee or Employee resigns following a formal suggestion by Employer that he resign, then Employee may, at his option, be deemed to be "terminated" on the effective date of Employee's resignation and the Employee shall also be entitled to receive the termination benefits set forth above. If Employee voluntarily resigns his position with Employer, Employee agrees to give the Employer thirty (30) days advance notice. If Employee voluntarily resigns his position with Employer, there shall be no termination benefits, as provided in this paragraph, due to Employee. 16. INDEMNIFICATION. The Employer shall defend and indemnify the Employee against and for all losses sustained by the Employee in direct consequences of the discharge of the Employee's duties on the behalf of the Employer. In the event, the Employee serves on boards of directors of City- related legal entities, the Employer shall extend the same 7 indemnification benefits and protections to Employee for the City - related entity as is provided for the Employee for actions taken on behalf of the Employer. Employer may compromise and settle, without the consent of Employee, any such claim or suit and pay the amount of the settlement or judgment rendered thereon. This covenant shall survive the termination of this agreement, but shall not obligate the Employer to pay punitive or exemplary damages which may be awarded but Employer may, in its sole discretion, elect to do so to the extent authorized by law. 17. OTHER CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT. Subject to any amendments, the City's ordinances, City Employee policies, and State Statutes, are all incorporated herein except to the extent that they conflict with this Employment Agreement, wherein this Employment Agreement shall be controlling. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer has caused this Agreement to be signed and executed on its behalf by its Mayor and City Clerk, and Employee has signed this Agreement, in duplicate, the day and year first written above. EMPLOYER: CITY OF EDINA BY: Mayor AND City Clerk 8 EMPLOYEE: SCOTT H. NEAL City Manager O \. To'. MAYOR AND COUNCIL . Agenda Item #: VIII. F. From: Scott Neal Action .® City Manager Discussion ' ❑ Date: February 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: CITY OF EDINA AND EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PARTNERSHIP GOALS � 4W, O Action Requested: Approve the proposed 2013 Commitment to Partnership Goals by and between the City of Edina and the Edina Public Schools. Information / Background: The City of Edina and the Edina Public Schools have a rich history of cooperation and collaboration that substantially benefits the residents and taxpayers of Edina. The respective leadership staff teams from the City and the School District met in joint session at Braemar Arena on November 30, 2012 to discuss a slate of proposed joint operational goals for 2013, a practice started in 2011. Attached to this memorandum is the draft 2013 Commitment to Partnership. Superintendent Dressen and I developed this agreement based on the November 30 joint staff meeting and our desire to increase the depth of our partnership in the year ahead. The attached draft was approved by the School board at their January 7, 2013 board meeting. If adopted by the City Council, the Superintendent and I will put. the goals into action and provide periodic reports to the City Council and School Board throughout the year. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 7, 2013 (DRAFT) City of Edina and Edina Public Schools Commitment to Partnership DEFINING EXCELLENCE Targeted Partnership Goals City and School District staff will conduct ongoing conversations and actions in the following partnerships: 1. To advance discussions and problem - solving related to the Grandview Small Area Plan (Dressen /Neal) 2. To enhance joint communications and marketing efficiencies (Bennerotte /Brott) 3. To advance discussions and problem - solving related to community recreational facilities (Bauck & Locklear /Kattreh) 4. To explore and coordinate community technology services, including in the areas of cable television, technology access, and system infrastructure (Buettner /Bennerotte) 5. To improve services and programs for youth life challenges through coordination of community resources (Smasal & Kodrich /Long & Iverson) 6. To enhance and coordinate joint community education opportunities (Burke /Kattreh) 7. To complete the coordination of select common staff training areas (Jackson/ Schaefer) 8. To seek innovative approaches to support the changing demographics of the Edina community (Dressen /Neal) c:\ users \sneal \appdata \local\microsoft \windows \temporary internet files \content.outlook \n3znmhhm \city- district joint goals 2013 - draft.docx s�, O Cn •'�roRPORp`��9 • lase To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. G. From: Scott Neal Action City.. Manager Discussion El. Date: February 5, 2013 Information D Subject:, MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND FOR FALL INTO THE ARTS FESTIVAL Action Requested: Approve proposed memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Edina Crime Prevention Fund for the annual Fall Into The Arts Festival. Information / Background: The annual Fall Into The Arts Festival is a major fundraising event of the Edina Crime Prevention Fund. The funds raised by the Crime. Prevention Fund are used largely to supplement the operating and capital budgets of the Police Department. Organizing and implementing the festival is complex operation that requires substantial coordination and cooperation between the Crime Prevention Board, their festival organizers and the City of Edina. The purpose of this memorandum of understanding is to resolve the respective roles and responsibilities of the parties in the present and :to memorialize the relationships for the future in order that the festival continues to be a successful venture for the Crime Prevention Fund and the City of Edina. The attached agreement was developed in conjunction with City staff and through a number of discussions with Crime Prevention Fund board members. The final document was prepared by the City Attorney and approved by the Crime Prevention Fund Board of Directors at their January 18, 2013 meeting. AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDINA AND THE EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 2013, by.and between CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and THE EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND, a Minnesota non - profit corporation ( "ECPF "). City and ECPF, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. DESCRIPTION. The Fall into the Arts Festival ( "Festival ") is an annual art show that is planned, coordinated and executed each year in September by the ECPF as a fund raising event for their charitable operations. 2. FACILITIES. The Festival shall occur at Centennial Lakes Park. The City shall reserve the park facilities the second weekend of September each year for the Festival. The Festival occurs on Saturday and Sunday. The ECPF shall have access to the Park and its facilities 24 hours prior to the start of the Festival for the purpose of preparing the Park for the Festival. The ECPF shall return the Park to the City no more than 12 hours after the completion of the Festival. 3. TERM. This Agreement is effective when signed by both parties and shall continue from year to year but may be terminated by either party upon one hundred days advance written notice to the other party. 4. PARK RENTAL FEES. The ECPF shall pay no park rental fee to the City so long as ECPF contributes a minimum of $3,000 to the City each fiscal year. 5. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES. The ECPF shall reimburse the City for expenses it incurs on behalf of the ECPF that are attributable to the Festival. Reimbursable expenses include such items as garbage bags, cleaning supplies, portable restroom rentals, etc. Reimbursable expenses shall be determined by the City following the completion of each Festival and the City will invoice ECPF following the final date of each Festival. ECPF shall pay the invoice within 30 days of receipt of the invoice. 6. STAFFING COSTS. City employees that perform work at the Festival shall remain employees of the City. The ECPF shall reimburse the City for direct staff costs for City employees that perform work on behalf of the ECPF at the Festival. 7. OPERATIONAL SUPPORT. The City will provide office space, storage space, telephone service, voice mail service and other operational support to the ECPF for the operation of the Festival. The City reserves the right to modify or change the level and nature of its operational support based on the operational needs of the City. 8. ADVERTISING AND MARKETING. The ECPF shall be responsible for all marketing efforts for the Festival. The City shall not pay for marketing efforts of the Festival. The ECPF shall not use City branding marks without the consent of the City. ECPF shall comply with all City signage regulations when marketing the Festival. 165652v] 9. USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT. The use of City -owned motorized equipment is restricted to City employees. 10. PARKING. The City agrees to share its parking rights with ECPF for the term of the Festival. ECPF is subject to parking rules and restrictions imposed by the owners of private parking facilities in the Centennial Lakes Park area. 11. BEER AND WINE. Pursuant to City Council Resolution 2006 -83, the City will operate an on -sale municipal dispensary at the Festival for the sale of beer and wine. 12. WORKER'S COMPENSATION. The ECPF shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota if the ECPF has any employees. 13. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. ECPF shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage d,hd`inaintain it at all times throughout the life of the Agreement, with the City included as an additional named insured. The ECPF shall furnish the City_a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: Property Damage Personal Injury $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non - owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence 14. INDEMNITY. ECPF agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties resulting from the Festival or arising under this Agreement except for the 165652vl 2 w, w '.L willful misconduct of the City. In addition, the ECPF shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney's fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 15. NOTICES. All notices, certificates or other communications required to be given to the City and ECPF hereunder shall be sufficiently given and shall be deemed given when delivered or deposited in the United States mail in registered or certified form with postage fully prepaid and addressed as follows: If to the City: City of Edina Attention: City Manager 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1330 If to ECPF The Edina Crime Prevention Fund 4801 W. 50`" Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1330 16. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Data Practices. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. B. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party' and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. C. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Agreement by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. D. Governing LawNenue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Agreement. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County. E. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Agreement is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not effect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Agreement impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties' entire Agreement. 165652v1 j' ,. F. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. G. Permits and Licenses. ECPF shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to this Agreement. CITY OF EDINA THE EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND C AND James Hovland, Mayor AND Its: Scott Neal, City Manager Its: 16s6s2vl 4 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 5, 2013 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council Meeting. No action is requested. U) - e'^�RPORPT�O e lose Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Susan Howl From: James Hovland Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:34 PM 'o: Ann Kattreh .;c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please support the fair usage of the Edina Aquatic Center Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Ann Kattreh. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist -,' 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Bmsiness From: ESTROBEL @comcast.net [mailto:ESTROBEL @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:14 PM To: James Hovland Cc: joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Subject: Please support the fair usage of the Edina Aquatic Center Good afternoon, Mayor Hovland. Today, I write to you with.a heavy heart, burdened with great sadness that the City of Edina has been manipulated by the poor sportsmanship of one of its athletic programs. As a resident of Edina, I have always been able to hold my head high as our youth athletes have demonstrated the finest of athletic prowess without sacrificing the sportsmanship that is such a critical part of all sport. I teach my children to compete to the best of their abilities, but to do so fairly, honestly and in the spirit of good sportsmanship. Today, I am embarrassed to be a resident of the City of Edina, for the City of Edina has failed to act the way that we expect our student athletes to behave. I speak of the Gators Swim Club. I have watched quietly as this club has tried to monopolize our city resources in what I consider to be an outrageously anti - competitive and unfair manner. I have watched with dismay as the Gators have shown incredibly poor sportsmanship and a lack of neighborly good will in their effort to obtain an unfair competitive advantage over a competing swim club. I am embarrassed for the swimmers, coaches and parents associated with the Gators Swim Club. More importantly, I am ashamed of the City of Edina's complicity in the Gator's anti - competitive campaign and can no longer sit back quietly and watch this process continue. As you know, last year the city lowed the residency requirement demanded of all Edina Youth Association members. The goal of this effort was clear and obvious. The Gators wanted to obtain preferential access to the city -owned Edina Aquatic Center at the expense of the Aquajets, a competing swimming team. I know that I do not have to remind you and the city councilors that this center was paid for by all of the citizens of our city, not just the few parents that make up the board of the Gators Swim Club. For the record, I thought that the city's decision to lower the residency requirement from 90% to 75% was poorly reasoned and constituted a dangerous departure from the historical purpose of the youth association designation. As a good "team member," however, I accepted the decision of my elected officials, no matter my personal distaste about the decision. I should add that I was dismayed that City Council Member Swenson chose to participate in the decision to exempt the Gators from the historical residency requirement despite her obvious conflict of interest. I was shocked that a former fiduciary officer of the Gators (Council Member Swenson was the president of the board of the Gators) failed to recuse herself from the Council's deliberatigns and vote given her obvious conflict of interest. I was frankly disappointed with what I consider to be a blatant violation of Council Member Swenson's public trust. I have just learned that at Tuesday's City Council Meeting, the Gators asked for, and received, yet another exemption of the residency requirement. This time, as I understand it, the Gators (unable to satisfy even the reduced 75% residency number) requested another exemption from even this watered -down residency requirement, 'lowering the residency requirement to just 60 %. More troubling, a city employee whose salary I pay, Parks and Recreation Directors Ann Kattreh, lead the charge, presenting the argument on behalf of the Gators. I would appreciate it if you could explain to me, a taxpayer of the City of Edina, what possible benefit the taxpayers derive from Ms. Kattreh speaking on behalf of a narrow special interest group? In this time of tightening budgets, does Ms. Kattreh not have enough to do such that she has plenty of time to advocate on behalf of small special interest groups? I understand that no advance notice was given of the pending issue despite the fact that last year this topic generated significant public debate and discussion. I further understand that no public comment was allowed, again despite the fact'that this same topic generated significant public debate last year. After Ms., Kattreh's impassioned plea on behalf of the Gators to dispense with sportsmanship, a preponderance of the-City Council apparently acceded to Ms. Kattreh's request. As a result of the above, I understand that the Gators Swim Club is now officially considered an Edina Youth Association if they can manage just 60% Edina residents on their team. I understand that Ms. Kattreh will be making a recommendation regarding allocation of pool hours at the Edina Aquatic Center in the next week. 'Based on Ms. Kattreh's advocacy and active involvement in the lowering of the residency requirements to benefit the Gators, I am very concerned about the fairness of her forthcoming recommendations. As a result, I urge you to assume control of the city's involvement to prevent a further worsening of an already bad situation. I urge you to meet the both the Aquajets and the Gators to broker a deal to ensure fair and full usage of the Edina Aquatic Center facilities. I would hate to see the City of Edina further sullied by what I consider to be the Gators' unseemly attempt to monopolize our public resources. I appreciate your time and attention to this matter. Best regards, Eric Strobel 5840 Creek Valley Road Edina, MN 55439 Susan Howl Dear Council Members and Parks Director, it is with dismay that I read an email from Aquajets regarding the ongoing soap opera of the Edina Aquatic Center pool hours. i will admit up front that I have a minor stake in this, as my son is on the Aquajets team. However, my concern comes more as a resident and taxpayer of the city of Edina. It is sad that elected members of the City Council as well as employed city managers appear to be in need of a reminder that they represent the resident of the entire city, not just special interest groups with whom they have a close relationship. I understand that Ms. Swenson is a former Edina Gators club president, which is without a doubt a potential conflict of interest. In a similar manner, I have previously noted that the Gators Swim team has at past Councl meetings been represented by Jeffrey Carpenter, who was on the Edina Swim Tearn board and an Edina Planning Committee member. Many council members have experience outside of city government and know that conflicts of interest have become a very hot topic in many facets of public and institutional life. These conflicts are not necessarily bad, but they need to be openly declared and reported on meeting minutes. I see no reason that the Edina City Council wouldn't hold itself to the same standards. Much of the problem is likely rooted in these murky unknown conflicts, otherwise the issue would be quite straightforward. The Council has previously stipulated that privileged junior sports teams must maintain a 90% Edina membership in order to continue to enjoy preferential treatment. This is important, because one of the issues here is that EDiNA residents who are on the Aquajets team are being denied access to an Edina city-owned facility. In this case, adherence to a core set of values would enable the City to make its decisions fairly. The city has previously established that that core value is 90% Edina membership. There has been no argument that the Gators swim team does not satisfy this standard. Now if the Council wants to change the rules, it may need to ask the larger community whether changing the rules for ALL sports groups to a 75% membership requirement is reasonable, or even, as you just decided in the case of the Gators swim team, whether the threshold should be 60 %. 1 would anticipate that if the policy to lower the membership were to be applied to all other sports, that you would have a vocal city council meeting on your hands. i think it is reasonable for me to expect that the City would apply the rules (i) fairly, i.e, to all sports, (2) and openly i.e. following discussion at a City Council meeting in which the agenda was set in advance. i found the following quote about Ms. Kattreh amusing in this context. The quote is: Braemar Arena General Manager Susie Miller, who worked with Kattreh for four years at Edinborough Park, said; "Ann is a great leader. 1 always say she is the most emotionally intelligent person 1 know. She doesn't get rattled. She is able to take a step back and make decisions that are in the best interest of everyone involved. She is very creative and able to think outside the box. am afraid that the City Council and Edina Parks department has made this way too difficult. Step back and look at the big picture. Have open meetings. Seek input from a wide group of stake - holders, and when you know who the stakeholders are, do not keep them purposefully in the dark. Declare your real or even potential conflicts of interest up front. Treat all reasonably similar cases similarly. I think if you had been doing this, you would have come to a different conclusion in this case. I thank you for your time. Matt Feldkarnp 5241 Halifax Avenue South Edina Susan Howl From: James Hovland Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:13 AM To: Ann Kattreh Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FVV: Aquatic Center Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Ann Kattreh. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ( r' 952- 927 -8861 I Fax 952 -826 -0389 ( I Ibiunno aCDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learn Raising Families & Doing Business From: Erica Austrums jmai Ito: eaustrumsCabaol.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:12 PM To:`James Hovland Subject: Aquatic Center Mayor Hovland, Please support.the shared use of the Edina Aquatic Center in the summer for both Gator and Aquajets swim clubs Over the past 8 years, I've had one of my children swim for Gators, and another with Aquajets, Now that the bike paths are in place, they can bike to and from the Aquatic Center for practice. Both Gators and Aquajets are excellent swimming clubs with many Edina residents, which need access to the scarce resource of a 50 meter pool for summertime training. Plus, it will continue to keeps a good revenue stream going for the Aquatic Center. It also supports your "healthy Edina" initiative :) - keep those kids exercising! Thank you for your consideration. Erica Austrums Edina Resident in the Cornelia Neighborhood 952 - 837 -8053 (h) 952 - 250 -9274 (c) eaustrums c- Daol.com Susan Howl Edina City Council I understand you are in the process of making a determination on the allocation of use for the Aquatic Center between the Edina Gators and the Aquajets. As a resident of Edina (6032 Berne Circle, Edina MN) with a son who is a member of the Aquajets, I would hope that your level of integrity and character as a group will prevail over any improper or discriminatory lobbying. Both groups are a great asset to our community and provide a wonderful benefit to our children. These standards are why people like to live in our community. Edina has a great reputation. I would expect a fair and level playing field that does not compromise the integrity and character of our community and would reflect a high level of professional character in promoting these types of programs. It seems to me that both groups would be able to share the facility as neighbors should. Regards, John John R. Rieger Vice President Accounting Policy US Bank 800 Nicollet -Mall BC- MN -H19Q Minneapolis MN 55402 612- 303 -4389 612- 710 -7630 fax 0ohn.rieger(a)usbank.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:38 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Aquatic Center Lynette Biunno, Receptionist VS f-h-I 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cbEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov r. , ; ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: romanion(abcomcast.net rmailto:romanion @ comcast.netl Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:33 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Ann Kattreh Subject: Edina Aquatic Center Hello I am' an Edina resident and Aquajet parent. There are few 50 meter pools in MN. We are very fortunate to have such a fine 50 meter pool here in Edina. All other Park & Rec pools during our short summer session share the pool with more than one swim club. Swimming is a life long activity and we as a community should support swimming. Renting the pool in the morning to swim teams is a good and consistent revenue source. As a tax payer I support this. I do recognize that The Gators have the Edina Youth Association distinction. However other Edina Youth Sport Associations have to maintain a 90% residency requirement while the Gators now only need 60% ( down from 75% just a year ago) to have priority access. There are about 100 Edina residents on the Aquajet swim team. We are not asking for more time at the pool, Gators already have twice as much time, just simply to share it. Thank you for your consideration. Rosemary Manion 6121 Crescent Dr. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:09 AM ro: Ann Kattreh Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Aquatics Center Access - A letter for Mayor Jim Hovland Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Ann Kattreh. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunn0( EdinaMN.gov i www.EdinaMN.gov L ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Todd. S.Johnson(a)homesvclending.com [ma ilto• Todd .S.John son 0)homesvclending.coml Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:35 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina Aquatics Center Access - A letter for Mayor Jim Hovland Good morning Mr. Hovland My wife Jan and 1 have been Edina residents since the mid 80's and make our home at 24 Circle West. We've been married for 30 years, and our youngest at home today are in the 6 "', 8i1, 1011, and 1 1"' grades. Swimming is one of the primary sports in our family, for our girls and our boys, from grade school through high school, and even college. Over the years we have found that Edina Swim Club and the Aquajets Swim Team have had the coaching and mentoring that fostered swim development, a great youth experience, and a collaborative culture. Both clubs enjoy roots in Edina, and have strong Edina representation on their teams. l don't know the number of Edina swimmers who belong to Gators today, but for Aquajets I believe the headcount is approximately 100. The parents of each club really great people, and some of our best friends are parents we met in the Gators program from nearly 20 years ago. For today, we've been exceptionally well served by the coaching staff at Aquajects for our sons. Since both clubs serve Edina families, we'd be very appreciate if the Edina Council would consider dedicating the time that both clubs need from the facility. If you have any questions about the basis for my request, please do not hesitate to drop a note or call. Thank you for your time and consideration. Todd S. Johnson President HorneServices Lending. LLC 1333 S 7th St, FL 27 Minneapolis, MN 55,102 Phone (612)336 -5600 todd.s.johnson rnr.homesvciending.com An Affiliate of 1Vells I ar,(Yo Ilome Mortgage and Berkshire IIomeservices orAinerica Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:18 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: ABC Fun Run Participation Request -x, Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 -927 -8861 i Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.raov -J =' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Cara Sierks jmai Ito: csierks @comcast.netl Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:04 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: ABC Fun Run Participation Request Hello Mayor Hovland, My name is Cara Sierks and I am part of Edina High School's Student Council. I am writing because I would like to invite you and your family and friends to our 4th annual ABC Fun Run. Students of the ABC Program are, from outside of the state and have been identified as high achievers. However, because they hail from low income families, their opportunities for success are limited. These students live together in a house with a host parent, but are unable to afford new clothes and other basic amenities because of their low monthly budget. Without the help of others, this program could 'not exist, so every year Edina Student Council holds a 5K Race and Silent Auction, and all proceeds go to the ABC Program. Please help us to make the day a success! The race will take place at Braemar Golf Course at 10 AM on February 2Id, 2013. Also, we are adding an element of fun by hosting a costume contest. The costumes should start with the letters A, B, or C and the winners will receive Chipotle Gift Cards. Thank you so much for considering our race and here is the registration link: http: / /www. active .com /running /edina- mn /abc- fun - run - 2013 ?cmp =1745 Thanks again, Cara Sierks Edina Student Council Aq�caje�s Swim Team To: Jim Hovland, Mayor City of Edina CC: Ann Kattreh, Parks and Recreation Director, Edina City Council From: Aquajets Board of Directors Date: January 30, 2013 Subject: Aquajets Position on the use of the Edina Aquatic Center Dear Mayor Hovland: On behalf of the Aquajets Swim Team, we thank you for calling our attention to the Residency Requirement request that the Edina Swim Club Gators broug ht before the City Council on January 22, 2013. Without notice from you, the Aquajets would not have known that the Gators were attempting to permanently relax residency requirements in the final hours before the Parks and Recreation Director and Pool Manager were to come to a decision regarding Edina Aquatic Center sum mer pool time allotment. While we were not allowed to present an alternative viewpoint, representatives of the Aquajets Swim Team appreciated the opportunity to observe the proceedings. We also thank you for voting against changing the residency requirement to 60% and voicing your concern that lowering the threshold again without public debate is unfair to Aquajets. We are very frustrated that the Gators continue to disregard Aquajets in this process despite our decade -long history of good relations with the City of Edina and the Aquatic Center staff as well as our growing number of Edina residents. As the Aquatic Center use issue continues to evolve, we want to let you know that our position on how the pool should be used remains the same as it has always been: Sharing the Edina Aquatic Center under the present Status Quo provides the Gators Swim Team with ample 50 -meter training time, serves a higher number of Edina residents and provides more revenue - generating opportunities for the City of Edina. A 50 -meter pool is a scarce resource in Minnesota and all other 50 -meter pools in the Twin Cities are shared by at least 3 teams. The swimming community historically relies on such collaboration between teams for the overall development of Minnesota swimming. The Gators have always enjoyed priority access to the Aquatic Center, presently with twice the Aquatic Center pool time as Aquajets. This arrangement ensures that the maximum number of swimmers and the maximum number of Edina residents are included in the usage of the tax - payer - funded, revenue - generating public facility. Both the Gators and Aquajets have thrived while sharing the pool. While a case might be made to allow the Gators to continue to have priority access to the Aquatic Center, the case for allowing any one private club to monopolize this public facility is lacking justification. Sharing the pool is what is best for the Edina community. Additionally, Aquajets is pleased to express our commitment to the revenue -gener ating future of the Aquatic Center by proposing a 2 -year rental agreement including a 25% rental prem ium at $15,000/ year (presently $12,000 / year) and an additional $10,000 / year in capital funding to be used by the Parks and Recreation Department at its discretion. To ensure adequate training options for the Gators, we also offer summer usage of the Aquajets 25 -yard pool at a guaranteed best rate. This offer reflects the willingness of the Aquajets to work with the Gators and the City of Edina to find a collaborative solution to the Aquatic Center use issue. The table below summarizes the options before the Edina Parks and Recreation Board and the City of Edina as it considers pool time allotment. We urge you to support the Shared Status Quo and make the best decision for the City of Edina and its residents. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Aquajets Board of Directors Gators Swim Team Monopoly Shared Status Quo 4 Hours for Gators, 2 Hours for 6 Hours for Gators Aquajets • Portions of time used with bulkhead ' Twice the training time for Gators as for novice swimmers negating compared to Aquajets. 50 -Meter Training advantages of 50 -meter pool. Aquajets offers 25 -yard training time Hours Portions of time used for masters to Gators at guaranteed best rate for swimmers, aged 21 and over novice swimmers and / or Masters defeating the purpose of designated swimmers who do not need 50 -meter Youth Sports Organization status. training. Number of swimmers, served Approx. 300 Approx. 700 by Edina Aquatic (400 Additional Area Swimmers) Center Number of Edina residents served Approx. 180 Approx. 280 by Edina Aquatic (Est. 100 Additional Edina Residents) Center Aquajets is willing to commit to a Revenue 2 -year rental agreement totaling Generating Limited. Monopoly leaves the Aquatic $50,000 in city revenue including: Opportunities for Center dependent upon one swim team A 25% rental premium (increase from Edina Taxpayer with no guarantee of competitive rates. $12,000 to $15,000 / season). Funded Asset An additional annual donation of $10,000 / season of capital funding. We urge you to support the Shared Status Quo and make the best decision for the City of Edina and its residents. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Aquajets Board of Directors City of Edina 4801 W. 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland / City of Edina: January 14, 2013 We request the Edina City Council abi � .; by Minnesota Statute and Edina Ordinance and deny the variance request of 5801 Crescent Terrace. Minnesota Statute and Edina Ordinances require that three conditions must be satisfied affirmatively to grant a variance. The courts have maintained it is the applicant who has a heavy burden of proof to show that ALL three prerequisites to the granting of a variance are satisfied. This is because a variance allows property to be used in a manner forbidden by the local ordinance. One of these mandatory conditions states, the variance can only be granted when "the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the petitioner ". The laws emphasize the requirement that a variance be due to circumstances "unique to the property ". The courts have held that practical problems and/or hardships peculiar to the present owner, even hardships such as handicaps, age, and family size, do NOT satisfy the prerequisite because they are not "unique to the property ". Similarly, self selection of home design and back yard amenities would be "peculiar" to the applicant and not "unique to the property". The variance request is for a Rolling Green neighborhood lot, which despite its pie shape, affords a relatively flat 12,000 SF building pad. Applicant proposes to raze the existing nonconforming setback house and build a home of considerable size, as well as extensive backyard amenities. The applicant's design for both house and rear yard amenities "self create" the "practical problems" that result in the variance request. The practical difficulty would not be unique to the property but peculiar to the applicant's wants and architectural design. Given the 12,000 SF building pad, a wide variety of home designs and back yard configurations could be built without granting of a variance. Additionally, the courts have held that a person who purchases land with knowledge, actual or constructive, of the zoning restraint which is in effect at the time of such purchase is said to have "created" whatever hardship the restriction entailed. Although this does not mean automatic denial of variance request, it is part of the evidence that must be considered in deciding whether there are practical difficulties imposed by the applicant not the ordinance. In this case, the applicant is a potential purchaser but not the current owner. This zoning knowledge, in addition to the proposed home architecture and extensive backyard amenities configuration, clearly "self creates" the practical difficulties for the applicant. Page I 1 WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL DENY THE VARIANCE REQUEST ON GROUNDS THAT THE "PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES" OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN FOR HOME AND BACKYARD AMENITIES ARE "PECULIAR" TO THE APPLICANT NOT "UNIQUE TO THE PROPERTY" AND THE APPLICANT HAS "SELF CREATED" THE PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES. Furthermore to prevent future confusion on variance requests, we request the Edina City Council to rule that the Edina Planning Department (EPD) is in error in its findings on the following statements: * "the required setback reduces the buildable area dramatically, pushes a new home farther back on the lot and impacts the ability to provide a reasonable rear yard on such a large lot ". EPD finding that "a reasonable rear yard on such a large lot" is a personal opinion and criteria that has no legal standing: The Edina zoning ordinance makes no mention of the right to a "reasonable back yard "; nor does it define what a reasonable back yard is. These arbitrary and capricious criteria that have no legal footing are inappropriate criteria for the EPD to offer as justification for.variance approval. Edina zoning ordinance references only a 25' rear yard (30 on corner rear lots) setback, but is silent on any other back yard rights of property holders. To convey that this applicant should be granted a setback variance to provide "a reasonable back yard on such a large lot" is to confer to applicant a privilege that is not offered to other residents. This EDP criteria for variance approval is arbitrary, capricious and beyond the jurisdiction afforded by the EPD by the Edina zoning ordinance. * "proposed use of house is reasonable; as the proposed home will uphold the established front setback already existing on the lot ". This finding is in direct conflict with the Edina zoning ordinance and is a personal opinion not supported by Edina zoning ordinance. Edina zoning stipulates a front yard setback rule and makes no reference to exceptions based on a pre- existing nonconforming home that are to. be razed. EPD is arbitrary and capricious in this determination that this pre- existing nonconforming location should set the new set back requirement. There is no statute to support this finding. Allowing staff to create zoning law is unlawful. Only through a specific process can the zoning regulations be changed. Staff errors in reaching beyond its jurisdiction when it ignores the requirements set by law and impose their own personal standards. Zoning ordinances should be strictly observed as deviation from these laws can lead to favoritism and corruption. * "the practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance include the triangular shape lot and the resulting amount of front yard that must be maintained given the required setback and the imposition of a deeper front yard setback given the lot has always had a home located closer to the street than neighboring properties ". Page 12 EPD failed to consider pertinent facts of the historical "precedents" and recent building experience established in Rolling Green subdivision that establishes that these factors are not "unique" to the applicant's property but common to many corner lots in the Rolling Green subdivision. Recently there have been a number of cases of non conforming homes razed on corner lots. In these cases, other property owners have dealt with characteristics common to the applicant's corner lots without variances. Applicant's brother at 17 Merilane is an excellent example. Characteristics common to corner lots are the criteria that EPD incorrectly declares are "unique" to applicant's property. (i.e. setbacks that result in larger front to back yard ratios, relative smaller buildable area to total area, limits to backyard space). In fact, the relatively- large lot sizes of the Rolling Green neighborhood make these corner lots more common than in other smaller lot size neighborhoods. EPD ignore these pertinent facts which results in the arbitrary and capricious recommendation for variance. In conclusion, the Edina City Council should rule in accordance with state and local zoning ordinances and deny the variance request. Personal opinions on best use of property should never overrule zoning ordinance protections. We would welcome new neighbors and a new home, but respectfully demand the zoning protections afforded the property owners by Minnesota and local law. Hopefully, the applicants will pursue a revision of their plans that meet the zoning ordinance without variance request or choose another Rolling Green property. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this matter. Kip Knelman (612- 850 -3110) Suzanne Knelman (859- 707 -5639) 4812 Rolling Green Parkway Edina, MN 55436 Cc: Joni Bennett Mary Brindle James Hovlan Josh Sprague Ann Swenson Page 13 Susan Howl From: jeanne riha [mailto:therihas @yahoo.coml Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 12:02 AM To: lisa.kaczke ecm-inc.com; news @karell.com; Edina Mail Subject: Fw: EPS News Alert: Board approves two -year calendar There is also the issue of the referendum that was passed in 2011 that funded the construction that makes the calendar waiver. possible. #1 they are using a loop hole #2 evidently discussions about the calendar change started in 2009 #3;�the referendum in 2010 made no mention of the calendar change that the board clearly saw as it's road to higher test scores #4 the board states that the reason for the calendar change is to facilitate higher test scores for Edina students - particularly AP scores which according to Board Member Almog are the "Edina Brand" Many Edina parents feel that the referendum had this additional unpublicized agenda. Had we privy been to the larger agenda, we would have asked that the referendum be written differently. Jeanne & Patrick Riha 5213 Meadow Ridge Edina,MN 55439 952- 944 -3670 - - - -- Forwarded Message - - - -- From: jeanne riha <therihas(o)-yahoo.com> To: " communications (aD-edina.kl2.mn.us" < communications (a),edina.k12.mn.us >; Dressen Ric <ricdressenCcD-edina.kl2.mn.us >; "idialmogaedina.k12.mn.us" <idialmogCoD_edina.k12.mn.us >; "reginevilleaedina.k12.mn.us" < regineville (cD- edina.kl2.mn.us >; "cathcella(a_edina.k12:mn.us" <cathcellaC_edina.k12.mn.us >; sarapatzloff(aD-edina.k12.mn.us; "lonskrentner edina.kl2.mn:us" <lonskrentner@edina.k12.mn.us >; " superintendent (Wedina.kl2.mn.us" < superintendent (cedina.k12.mn.us >; "robgardner(�edina.k12.mn.us" <robaardner(d_)edina.k12.mn.us> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 11:29 PM Subject: EPS News Alert: Board approves two -year calendar The fact that you make it sound as if you actually made a good faith effort to solicit input from the parent community and teachers is just plain false. Shame on all off you for misrepresenting this to the EPS community. You obviously don't understand that families are looking for more than test scores when they choose schools. Tonight there are many parents who would not recommend District 273 because of our elected school board and the administrators who are paid with our tax dollars. As you are aware, there are many districts in the area that test similarly - if that's all you're looking for......... Jeanne Riha NINA S. FLANDERS 7151 York Ave. So. #1114 Edina, MN 55435 Email: nsflanders@comcast.net January 14, 2013 HUD Michael Schimmenti, Director Office and Facilities Management Services Room 51.80 451— 7t' Street SW Washington, DC 20410 Dear Mr. Schimmenti I'm not certain that you are the person I should be addressing; as such I'm sending a copy to HUD's Secretary Shaun Donovan. I rent an apartment in a HUD facility that is scheduled for a major upgrade this spring. A newly issued Resident's Manual is very specific on a resident's upkeep responsibilities including window washing and air vent maintenance. Unless things have changed, this 12 -story building is designated for low income seniors plus a number of handicapped individuals. During the first meeting with the new owners, I questioned the window washing and air vent cleaning as building maintenance. I was told they would look into it but the new Manual is very specific that these two items are a resident's responsibility. When I first brought it to their attention, I was told that if I were in my own home, I would have to do the cleaning; however my home didn't have 12 floors (I'm on the I l h) and the air vents were in the floor not at ceiling level where it takes a step ladder to access them. Many of the residents here at Yorktown are in their 80's and 90's and even as they might have help with cleaning and other chores, most providers have specific rules that forbid their use of ladders or stools. Would you like to guess how many of the handicapped or aging residents are capable of using a ladder without falling? I called the City of Edina, questioning specifically their codes on high rise buildings and window washing. They leave it to the owners as does HUD so the building owner has no legal responsibility and it falls on the shoulders of the residence to satisfy the lease? Need I point out how ridiculous that is when we are talking about the low income elderly and the handicapped? We have been notified that it is up to each of us to find a licensed and insured contractor to fulfill the demands that residents wash their own windows and clean their own air vents. What happens if we don't have the extra funds to pay for this demand? Are we then subject to eviction for not complying with the lease? As it is now, many will have to decide between food, medicines or clean air vents and windows - two items that I believe should be part of building maintenance. With an aging,population and more high rises being built, perhaps it's time that HUD and the communities you build 'in rethink some of these policies. I am copying Edina's mayor and the new management company. Sincerely, I Nina Sanders CC: Shawn Donovan, Secretary HUD James B. Hovland, City of Edina Mayor Premier Management at Yorktown Continental 2 N Susan Howl Dear City Council, city staff and Name Your Neighborhood Committee Members: As many of you know, I have been meaningfully involved in the Country Club neighborhood for the past ten years. As a strong believer in neighborhoods as a critical building block to strong communities, I applaud the Name Your Neighborhood committee, city council and city staff's efforts to contribute to stronger neighborhoods in Edina. We are thankful to have such a proactive and forward thinking city! While I do not represent the Country Club neighborhood residents, I do make efforts to share information with the neighborhood, and to collect input. I have communicated with many residents about the Name Your Neighborhood initiative, and a basic survey of residents was conducted. I was unable to attend the public hearing due to out -of -state travel for work, but I have some input to share on the initiative. Overall, my recommendation is to allow the committee more time to complete the project for three reasons: 1) 1 think it is important that the committee have time to talk to some of the existing neighborhood "associations" to gather input. At this time, I know that, at a minimum, the committee has not had time to talk to the current organizers of the Country Club and Sunnyslope neighborhood groups. I believe that valuable input could be provided by discussing this initiative with people that have decades of experience establishing and maintaining neighborhood groups in Edina. Over the past ten years, in the Country Club neighborhood, we have been able to establish a monthly neighborhood magazine named Country Club Life that provides neighborhood news, we have over 90% of the homes on a neighborhood email list with regular communication, a published directory is issued to 100% of the homes each year, over 60% of the homes contribute $40 or more for community activities each year, and several hundred people attend the major neighborhood events throughout the year. We have learned a lot over the course of our history about what works, and what doesn't, and we'd be happy to share that with the committee. Based on what I've read, the current policy runs the risk of doing as much harm as good, and we would like to contribute our knowledge so that the objectives of the initiative can be fully achieved without the risk of some pitfalls that we have observed. 2) The current policy, as read by me and many others, runs the risk of extending and complicating the city government in Edina. I believe that the committee needs to think more deeply about the risks of some of its recommended policies. The concept of requiring neighborhood associations to be elected by residents, is viewed by many as an unnecessary additional layer of representation and politics being imposed on our neighborhoods. I assume elected neighborhood officials is a requisite to allow the neighborhood associations to represent the neighborhood residents on city matters such as long -range planning, street redesign, zoning and other matters outlined in the Name Your Neighborhood materials. For many residents the idea of elected neighborhood officials in not appealing. Residents would like to. elect our city council and from there represent themselves fully, as individual residents of Edina, not as a resident of a neighborhood. The current policy says that individual residents can still represent their views, but the point is that the residents don't want anyone from the neighborhood, elected or not, representing their views to the city officials or staff on any matters, not long - range planning, not zoning, not street redesign, etc. While it could be appealing and convenient for the city to have a sub -set of residents to engage on key matters, it is not desired by many residents. They look to the council to serve this function. - To provide some data on this matter, in a survey of Country Club residents, 85% of respondents answered no when asked, "I agree that another layer of politics and representation is needed in Edina, and that elected neighborhood officials should represent resident interests on city matters such as long -range planning, zoning changes, street redesign, parks, etc." 90% answered no to the question, "I agree the city of Edina should expend resources -- including staff time, copying, and mailing costs - -to establish and support elected representatives in Neighborhood Associations." 97% answered no to the question, "I am interested in being involved in neighborhood politics i.e. running for an elected position within the neighborhood association." As you can directionally see from the survey responses, an important tenant in the Country Club neighborhood "association" is that the group does not make any attempt to represent the neighborhood, but simply act as a conduit for communication and collecting input. With today's technology an association can help the neighborhood have.a voice without having representation of its residents by an elected few. This would suggest a neighborhood policy design that does not include elected`representatives, but may include providing. neighborhoods with communication tools, and survey or other input collection tools. Again, more time will allow the committee to think about the ability to use technology to achieve the objectives. The idea of more elected officials seems to take us backwards, not forwards in this age of technological advancement. If the Name Your Neighborhood committee would have talked to the Country Club organizers, they would have heard that we believe that elected officials will not resonate with many neighborhoods; and Country Club appears to be one of them from the information collected to date, and from our experience with the residents. The Country Club group, because it is not an elected group, is very inclusive. Anyone can volunteer, and anyone can contribute without fear of neighborhood politics or formality. Each year we get a new mix of peop,l. contributing. This structure has worked for our neighborhood so far, and what we're hearing from residents is that the current structure of the Name Your Neighborhood policy seems to threaten a structure that we value, and the "don't attempt to represent the residents" key tenants that has made our neighborhood work so far. 3) The current naming and geographical boundaries for the neighborhoods concern many residents. Perhaps this is more data to support that more time is needed for the committee to do its work. I believe that more time to interact with the neighborhoods could have uncovered some of the dissonance with the proposed structure. A few phone calls between the organizers in Country Club and Sunnyslope got to an agreed point of view that would likely be supported by the neighborhood residents. By rushing this, process, we are missing this type of input, and it led to a recommendation that is out of alignment with what the residents want. In the survey, 94% of respondents answered no to the question, "I am in favor of defining our neighborhood as the `Greater Country Club' neighborhood, which includes Country Club, Sunnyslope, and elements of 44th Street and 50th Street." Overall, I applaud the efforts regarding neighborhoods in Edina. Like anything, the "devil is in the details ", and everything is a double -edged sword —what can be positive also holds the potential to be quite negative. To achieve the benefits, and avoid the potential downsides of the neighborhood initiatives, I think additional care needs to be taken to avoid imposing an additional layer of representation and politics on our neighborhoods, to get the input from the people that have worked on these neighborhood associations for years /decades, and to be sure that we get the geographical designations as well aligned as possible. Anything worth doing is worth doing- right, and more time would benefit this initiative greatly. Thank you for all the efforts to make Edina a stronger community. I look forward to contributing in whatever way possible. Sincerely, Rob Webb 4516 Drexel Avenue Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 9:30 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Naming of Neighborhoods Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 "I Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov For Living, Learning, Raising Fatuities & Doing Business From: Tom'Lohmann jmailto :trl(a)pinehurstprops.coml Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 9:24 AM To: Edina.Mail Subject:_ Naming of Neighborhoods City Council, It appears as though a committee has been coming, :yp with new names for neighborhoods which don't need new names i.e. "Greater Country Club ". It sounds like, Greater Minneapolis and St. Paul, not a neighborhood name with history or reference, but a geographical delineation. Rolling Green.becoming Interlachen seems to be a reference to the country club by the same name. Does everyone in Rolling Green belong to Interlachen? Perhaps we could open the process to the neighbors themselves and enable them to deal with the issue. By the way, what's wrong with the original name Sunny Slope? Does Rolling Green need a new name? Does it have negative connotations the way it is? Seems like a committee run amok. Pine hurst.1'ropert:i.c Thomas R. Lohmarm Principal 612- 929 -0007 1 Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:27 PM Subject: FW: changing the Country Club neighborhood boundaries and definition This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Council; the Assistant City Manager, staff liaison to the neighborhood- naming effort; and the City Manager Intern. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant E~ i 952 -826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastner(cDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: P Seng [mailto•pseng2012Cabgmail.coml Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: changing the Country Club neighborhood boundaries and definition To whom it may concern, I disagree with changing the boundaries and name of the Country Club neighborhood. This neighborhood was built and named over 80 years ago, and is a "historic. neighborhood ". Even on the City of Edina website, it's recognized as being on the National Register of Historic Places. I think redefining it at this point causes the neighborhood to lose some of it's identity. It seems like a redefinition based on convenience - as in "Sunnyslope doesn't fit anywhere, it's too small to be considered it's own neighborhood (although it isn't, IMO), let's just combine it with Country Club" I've been a resident for 19 years and like to see the continuation of our existing neighborhood definition. Thanks for your consideration. Peter Seng 4522 Drexel Ave Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:52 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Sunnyslope Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 11 Ibiunnoi Susan Howl Subject: I see several alternatives to the pre labor day start of Edina Public Schools To those it may concern, I am writing as a parent of a 24 year old who graduated in '07 and who I feel is successful in large part due to the excellent education this district has given her and also as the .parent of two current students in 5th and 6th grade(Cornelia and Southview). I would like to outline my objections and offer some alternatives prior to the Monday night August School start vote. I am concerned that consideration of public opinions on this change began over a busy season for most families so it might have missed many Edina residents attention. It also lacks transparency. Suggesting making attendance allowances for children with prior commitments makes no sense to me. -Is it up to teachers to bring excused children up to speed? They already juggle children at different paces and yet we excuse those who had set plans? Temperatures in the buildings are hotter in August than September. - Although June is warm most of the first week of June is "wrap up" so kids don't need to be at peak performance. Will the scheduled 2015 air conditioning be moved up? Is it even cost effective to put in air conditioning? To these points: Can this be held off until 2014 giving citizens more notice or until 2015, (which I believe was the year suggested for air conditioning). Either seems to make more sense. In the interest of increasing test scores could we try some of the following suggestions? Summer Math goals of facts(addition, -subtraction, multiplication and - division) and /or review of the "secure goals" would help tremendously. Math summary tests which students can practice so summer lag is minimized? -If I was told my child needed to pass a facts test based on a course they took the year before, my children and I would review. It is sensible to put this habit into practice. This doesn't have to be costly on paper. This could be a web site with chapter exams and instruction that children review a chapter test a week. The school years I have my kids retake their math tests in any class before returning we have a more successful year because they are competent in the secure goals. The kids who don't have access to computers could go home with a paper copy. Reading Goals -Breck sends out a reading list of required books for the.next year. The kids have read them before they arrive in the fall. This teaches children that both pre- reading and re- reading is helpful. AP classes could do this with their rending. Hand out the textbook online version with specific chapters to be read. 30+ years ago when I took AP, classes we received our textbooks in June and I did my reading. Parents who appreciate the advantages of an AP class would understand the need for the pre reading. The curriculum discussion I attended at Southview a few weeks past suggested flipped learning so class could be more discussion. The above suggestions are in line with that thinking. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Susan Lacy 4405 Claremore Or Edina, MN 55435 z Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:46 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood names Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.l;ov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tom Jones fmailto:tom @renex.usl Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 3:28 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood names They are what the legal says they are,(with minor exceptions). Leave "brands" that have earned enhanced reputations, or possess certain characteristics ( planned. by their builders, developers and homeowners) be left alone. This waste of time creates confusion, fails to differentiate, where many neighborhoods possess differentiation. 49 year 4 neighborhood resident and over 3 decades of residential real estate. Tom Jones Sent from my Whone 4 r _ -___ Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:24 AM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood name changes Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Polly Holley [mailto:ppholley @mac.coml Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 7:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood name changes This is such an unnecessary exercise in "waste of time ". For those of us who grew up here, this idea is preposterous. Why change a good thing ? ?? I disagree wholeheartedly with this movement by a few!!! Why do some people think that CHANGE is a "better" idea ?.... As I see it, it only adds to the confusion of life! Polly Holley Sent from my iPhone 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:24 AM' To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nname change Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Iblun noC@ Edina MN.gov'I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message From: Helene Haugland f mailto :doug.haugland @>;mail.coml Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 6:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Nname change We have lived in Sunnyslope for 51 years we are proud of our neighborhood Association we do not want. A name change Thanks Doug and Helene Haugland Sent from my iPad 1 Susan Howl Subject: RE: Proposed Neigborhood Agglomerations & Name Changes Dear Mayor-Hovland: It has been many years since we crossed paths on a case in North Dakota where I was representing the ND Board of Medical Examiners, and you were representing a physician. It was so much fun this year when my kids were paying attention to all of the political yard signs. While they were getting caught up in which party each candidate was for, I was encouraging them to look at the person behind the party. It was even. more .fun that I could tell them that I actually knew our Mayor - -had a case against him, and that he is a very good person. John and I do not agree on everything (I think we live in a McMansion that he frequently writes about), we do agree 100% on the importance of Sunnyslope neighborhood staying Sunnyslope. We moved to Edina in 2008, and while we looked in the Country Club area as well, we decided on Sunnsylope because of the larger lots and rolling-landscape. We were truly amazed when we moved into our home and found this wonderful neighborhood -- people throw welcome to the neighborhood parties, folks get together on the corner on Friday afternoons in the summer, and when one of the kids have a lemonade stand (as both of mine frequently do), almost everyone stops. It is a truly special place, with a small /special identity, and an amazing sense of community. We hope that you will support our wonderful small, diverse and special neighborhood keeping its identity as such. Thank you for your consideration. Sara (Gullickson) McGrane 1 Susan Howl Subject: Neighborhood Associations Mayor Hovland, First of all I would like to say hello again and thank you for your service to our community. A number of years ago, I had worked with you and your wife on the issue of sound walls for our neighborhood. Unfortunately, it didn't work out for me and my immediate neighbors on West Sunnyslope but some of my neighbors north of me enjoy a little less noise due to their new sound walls. The reason I am writing is the issue of Neighborhood Associations ( "NAs "). I am somewhat confused as to the reason for some of the discussions I am hearing from my neighbors. I have lived on West Sunnyslope for about 21 years. I am aware that our neighborhood legally is part of the Country Club district even though most long time Edinans refer to us as the Sunnyslope Neighborhood. It is my understanding that the City of Edina is going through some kind of process in which more formal NAs are being established. I'm not clear on the purpose of this or how this will affect us. How would declaring us part of the Greater Country Club district affect us? Would this mean that our neighborhood would be subject to majority rule on matters of public works etc with the rest of the Greater Country Club NA? Please fill me in. As you know, our neighborhood is distinct and secluded due to the boundaries of Mill Pond, Hwy 100 and 501h street. The Sunnyslope NA has been a long established informal organization which was formed before I moved here in 1992. In Sunnyslope due to seclusion we have distinct needs and wants. For example, due to our layout we decided against sidewalks a number of years ago. We do not get much traffic outside of our neighbors and thought it important to keep our quaint streets without sidewalks. This desire might not appeal to places that have more traffic. Personally I love the neighborhood. The only issue in my mind is the proliferation of McMansions. There have been 15+ new (or significantly remodeled) houses built since I've been here. It has changed the character of the neighborhood from a 40's era neighborhood to a hodgepodge of new and old which is in my opinion is less appealing. I suspect that I would be against being added to the Greater Country Club NA if it means that it diminishes our ability to work with the City on issues that are distinct to our neighborhood, however, if this is really only about a name and being kept informed through formal NAs then I don't have a problem since no matter how we are designated Edinans will call us Sunnyslope, like they always have. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or comments. Jim Barna, Guzy and Steffen, Ltd. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Blvd. Mpls., MN 55433 -5894 763- 783 -5163 fax 763- 783 -5109 av_ogl@bgs.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:13 PM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Sunnyslope Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klug man. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(ZDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Sz Doing Bisiness From: Shawn O'Grady [ mailto :Shawn.OGrady(cbgenmills.coml Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:48 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Becky O'Grady Subject: Sunnyslope Mayor Hovland, My wife and I are residents of the Sunnyslope neighborhood (and past residents of the Country Club area). I have been made aware of the current discussion regarding the "renaming" of the neighborhoods. My wife and I have enjoyed both of our experiences in Edina neighborhoods. One of the most enjoyable parts of Edina is being part of the larger city, but also being more closely knit to our smaller neighborhood. We would ask that you continue to protect that by not supporting the current movement. Thank you again for your service to the city and for listening. Shawn and Becky O'Grady 4907 E Sunnyslope Rd. 1 Susan Howl Subject: Name Your Neighborhood Members of the Town Council, I have only been a resident of Edina since the Spring, so I feel I can provide a "newcomer's" voice. (Although I know, even if you have lived here over a decade, you're still considered a "newcomer. ") What attracted my family to Edina was (in order): the excellent schools, the convenient lifestyle, and the strong sense of community. I can't understand why you would want to tamper with something you are already doing SO well with the "Name Your Neighborhood" Initiative. Is this idea addressing a problem I am not aware of? Otherwise, it seems an utter waste of time and resources. I feel it could have the potential to break the town into various voting blocs. It also adds an unnecessary extra layer between the individual voter and the town government. Edina already offers individuals various means to communicate with the town government. The website is user friendly and there are multiple ways to have your opinion on various issues conveyed. I am absolutely NOT interested in the "Greater Country Club Neighborhood Association" communicating on my behalf. I think this could be quite problematic — again — I envision voting blocs — where individual voices are ignored in favor of the sanctioned neighborhood association. In addition, as a homebuyer who is new to the area, all of these neighborhood associations would have been be a turn-off to me. This is 'a whole city, not a selection of various neighborhood factions. It feels very contrived. In Country Club, there exists a wonderful sense of neighborhood and pride. But, this came about organically, from the residents, not from the Town Government setting guidelines and implementation. One need just walk around any neighborhood in town and see the multiple "Edina Hornets" apparel to know that we all have "Edina Pride." I have lived on both the East and West Coasts, and what Edina has is unique and wonderful. Again, I question the need for this initiative, the costs, and the possible negative impact. Thoughtfully, Caroline Correia - 4515 Drexel Avenue Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:00 PM To: Karen M. Kurt; Ariel Klugman Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Neighborhood name change Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Karen Kurt and Ari Klugman. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I. www. Edina MN ;gov, ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kelly Jasper fmailto:kellyiasper @visi.coml Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 11:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Neighborhood name change Greeting, We are writing to request that our neighborhood keep the name "Sunnyslope ". It has been our neighborhood's name and served us well for years. We as a neighborhood identify with the name, and the community as a whole knows the Sunnyslope name and neighborhood as well. The Sunnyslope neighborhood -and name is well established, and happily so - so why confuse things or cause upset by changing it? Sincerely, Kelly and Joe Jasper 4812 Woodhill Way Sunnyslope Neighborhood #952.926.2626 Sent from my iPhone 1 Susan Howl Mayor Hovland; am John Currie, a resident of Sunnyslope, and one of the six people who took the opportunity to address the Council last night in the matter of the neighborhood associations. Thank you for your attentiveness to the community and our opinions during the City Council meeting. I imagine that presiding over the bunch of us and our individual concerns and opinions is not unlike herding cats, so your patience is appreciated. I do not want to see our neighborhood name changed, formally or informally. I respect the efforts of the volunteer community who took on the task of reviewing the matter, and the time that they invested, but 1 heartily disagree with their recommendations. As it.relates to Sunnyslope directly, we are an established neighborhood, with an unofficial but well - established Sunnyslope neighborhood Association that pre - dates my move to Edina in 1994. Our association collects voluntary dues from each family each year, publishes our own neighborhood directory, and organizes at least two neighborhood get - togethers annually: Summer and Winter Holiday. And in the past few months, when one of our families suffered a tragic death, and when the Kirsch family outside of our immediate neighborhood lost their dear son, we came together as a neighborhood to reach out to these families. We are an active, vital neighborhood. While we recognize that we do actually exist as some part of Country Club, no one really feels a part of that community, and as we heard last night, Country Club doesn't see us as apart of theirs either! (Of all the nerve...) We don't need a new name. We don't need to have an identity created for us. We have both already, and are happy, content and proud of our little sequestered community. The natural borders of the creek, Hwy 100m and 50th Street rather instinctively define and embrace us, and create for us a foundation for the small neighborhood that we are. We welcome new residents, and always will, although I personally will grouse and complain about the influx of McMansions which are stomping into our neighborhood. Yuck. In the larger picture, i feel that the size of our neighborhood is perfect for meeting the City's goals of fostering relationship and a sense of community between a given neighborhood's residents. When i see neighborhoods of 500 and 800 homes, i can't imagine how they can have the same sense of familiarity and comfort, one with the other. i suppose that their residents are comfortable with what they already have; it is just not how I imagine the scale of a neighborhhod to be. also think that neighborhoods such as Sunnyslope, who already have associations and established identities, should be respected for our up -by- our - bootstrap efforts and recognized as we already are and not asked to become something other. 1 am certain that there might be ways that we can make ourselves more easily reachable by the city in matters of community communication, and am equally certain that we will be open to any further suggestions and discussion of how that might be effected. I have asked other residents to contact you, so if they do so, you can either thank or curse me, at your pleasure... Regardless, I remain a happy resident of Sunnyslope and Edina, and look forward to seeing you from behind the wheel of my WWIi jeep on July 4th. Best Regards, John Currie 4929 W Sunnyslope Road Edina, MN 55424 0ohn(aD-currieworks.com +1 952 928 3017 Ail bA I t k s �q A k { t ai l �' - caw X41 . r . I MAMICE W. DIXON 6515 Gleason Court Edina, Minnesota 55436 (952) 933 -n January 23, 2013 To: Mayor James Hovland From: Maurice Dixon This is a follow up letter to our phone conversation on Mon. Jan.20,2013, regarding you wanting to tax us over one Million dollars a year to make Edina the " Most Walkable City in Minnesota ". You want to disguise this tax as a service fee collected buy our energy suppliers and have them take their time and money to pass it along. — Please be honest with your citizens of your city. We pay plenty of taxes and other fees to the city of Edina and for you, to play this game is way out of line. You should be trying to find ways to save a million or lots more dollars a year, for your tax payers. I walk in Bredesen Park and I can assure you there is plenty of room for more people to walk and bike in this park and I am sure that is true for all of our walking areas. I could also go on about your biking plans on Wooddale and other places that have cost lots of money and service only a very small percent of the people but I will leave that for another time. Please put a stop to this nonsense and please share these thoughts with our council members. I would be happy to discuss this subject with you or any of our council members in more depth at any time. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 1:25 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: Fw: Utility Franchise Fees Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist +�rC.l , f + ! 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 ,r..� Ibiunn6(c- EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Bert Ledder [mailto:lsledder (daol.coml Sent: Friday,'Jan lary 25, 2013 12:33 PM To: Edina Mail; jorii ben nettl2@comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague0)edinarealty.com; swensonannlC)gmail.com Subject: Utility Franchise Fees Council, I am writing to express my dismay at the recent enactment of the TAX, euphemistically called a "franchise fee" applied to.our utility bills that would return to the City of Edina for "the development, construction and maintenance of new infrastructure and facilities for pedestrians and cyclists ". As a citizen of Edina for almost 30 years I find this to be a gross over extension of the government and your positions on the council. It is not right to arbitrarily confiscate money from the tax payers of Edina for your "pet projects ". We have far too many bike lanes in Edina that have created more of a hazard than an added value. We do NOT want to drive with bikers. It is dangerous for both. Bert Ledder 6709 Cheyenne Trail Edina, Minnesota 55439 Susan Howl Subject: FW: To Mayor or city council From: Wuest, Peter C jmailto:petwuest edina.kl2.mn.usl Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 4:12 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: To Mayor or city council To whom it may concern As a teacher in Edina, I am writing to inquire about your thoughts regarding the Edina Schools starting the week before Labor Day. I know this is a school board issue, but parents and teachers alike are dismayed to hear their objections ignored. Over 200 Edina citizens have written their disapproval. There is no clear reason to change the school calendar. It is a solution in search of a problem and opposition remains strong for numerous, well thought out reasons(see below). What can we do to stop this from happening? Sincerely, Peter Wuest 5"' Grade Teacher (952)848 -3260 Class website Creek Valley Elementary Edina, Minnesota 6401 Gleason Rd 33439 9 Susan Howl From: jeanne riha Lmailto:therihas @yahoo.coml Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:04 PM To: contactC&jimhovland.com; Edina Mail Subject: Residents are Unhappy! Dear Mayor Hovland, I wanted to share with you 2 letters (below) written to the Edina School Board regarding the proposed school calendar change. I think if asked, you would find that the majority of parents do not agree with this change or the rationale for it because it has a negative effect on the quality of life in Edina - in more ways than the dates on the calendar. There will be an article in the Star Tribune tomorrow. We are asking that the School Board delay their vote tomorrow night until they have given parents the time to understand the changes and give meaningful input - meaning they be open to other solutions to the perceived "not good enough" test score "problem ". Our exceptional public schools in Edina are one of many jewels in the proverbial crown of life in Edina. Anything you could do encourage a slow down of this process would be greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Jeanne Riha Jeanne & Patrick Riha 5213 Meadow Ridge Edina,MN 55439 952- 944 -3670 Friends: I just wanted to make sure you were aware that the School Board will make their final decision regarding moving the school start times up 1 week during their meeting on MONDAY, JANUARY 28, 2013 at 7:00 PM, ECC Room 349. According to the email we received this week, the "working group" appears to be moving forward to make this alteration to the school calendar starting THIS August 2013, regardless of the many parents in the district who have expressed their opposition. I have researched this issue with the surrounding school districts: Bloomington, Burnsville, Anoka Hennepin, EP, Wayzata, Minnetonka Hopkins, Osseo, etc and ONLY QNE, Minneapolis, begins school before Labor Day, and they still don't finish until June 4, 2013, because they have many 1/2 days. Also, EDINA appears to l the only school district that has the entire week of Thanksgiving off. Most schools just have Wed -Fri. ALSO, the proposed calendar for next year adds vacation days to the Christmas holiday break, so, if the purpose of early start is to increase days of instruction earlier in the year (to prep for all the tests that take place in April and May), they are taking away days of instruction at Christmas. The students in the Edina School District already get some of the highest test scores in MN w/ the current calendar. PLUS, as I said they are making the kids go back to school 1 week early, in August, so they can, give them additional days off in Dec /January ? ?! ! For the first time I can recall, we have two- 4 =day, weekends in Jan and February. Again, they propose to give extra days off in Dec, Jan & Feb, and take vacation days, away in August ?? During the MN State Fair. Our kids will never get a chance to work at the St Fair, and probably won't get to even attend unless their parents are willing to go on very busy weekend days. I've looked at the full proposed calendar, and with the add'1 days off in Dec'13 /Jan'14, the kids will have approx 3 days of add'1 instruction prior to test time, as compared to this year. They are again proposing 2 - 4 -day weekends in Jan & Feb, 2014. (So much for reducing the # of 3 -day school weeks, as was a suggested reason for the changes.) lit tp: / /edina kI2 mn us /sites /default/fi les/ attachments /14 /downloads /OnePageCalendar 1.3 -14 PF 0110SED. ndf. I am concerned that it feels like this new calendar is being jammed through very quickly. I first heard about within the last month, how about you? So there is little time for parents to consider the ramifications, or mount an objection. (If you agree with, and are happy about, the proposed calendar, that is fine. I just wanted to address these matters to any of you who my have concerns about the changes, and how quickly they are being implemented.) I've provided links to the above information from the Edina School District website about the calendar changes. Please consider getting involved. As I've said, they are moving this thru VERY quickly. Laurel Fischbach really brought this matter to my attention with her petition a few weeks ago. Her husband, John Fischbach is ho in someone among you knows of an Attorney who can file a suit to stop the School Board from voting on Monday, to give more time for consideration of these changes. Let me know if know anyone who could help. To email any comments: BoardofEducation @edina.kl2.mn.us Attend the School Board Meeting on Monday, Jan 28th at 7 pm in the ECC. Forward this email to any of your friends in the district who might have concerns. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /// / / /// Dear Board Members: I would like to express my extreme disappointment in the statements made in the recent alert message. I am disappointed in the lack of consideration to those parents who oppose the change to a pre Labor Day start as well as the lack of research by the Board and the calendar committee to truly get the community opinion. My understanding is that your role as Board Members is to aspire to meet the district mission which is: The mission of the Edina Public Schools, working in partnership with the family and the community, is to educate all individuals to be responsible, lifelong learners who possess the skills, knowledge, creativity, sense of self - worth, and ethical values necessary to thrive in a rapidly changing, culturally diverse, global society. It specifically states that there is a partnership with families, yet, there was no survey taken of parent's opinions to see what is important to them. The Board charged the calendar committee with finding the best calendar solution with the start date of pre Labor Day only. Again, why was this the only parameter? Why wasn't the calendar committee tasked with finding the best solution for both a pre Labor start and post Labor Day start? It appears that this decision was made long before the last couple of months with no input from families. No where in the above mission statement does it state that our kids must score the highest on standardized testing nor does it state that the goal is to have the highest number of AP students. I like the mission because it talks of well rounded individuals not test takers. I think you have all moved away from what really is important to parents and are trying to create this "AP brand" as Board member Almog mentioned in the Jan. 10 Board meeting. ------------- I - ------------- In-addition, the district's Values-are: Students, staff, school board and community members will dedicate themselves to the following standards: • �C W. e. Care ompassion: Helping others t lEmbracing Diversity: !Understanding and respecting other people • We Dare Olntegrity:,Acting.on one's beliefs OCourage: Meeting a challenge • We Share F.111 Responsibility: Being dependable FD Commitment: - ;Keepinq one-'s, promises I don't see any reference in the values that having the highest standardized tests and the greatest number of AP students are important t6the district's'v - alues. I truly wish that you would do the right thing by getting the proper feedback from the community. You are taking away important family time by shifting the start date. We live in a state where the weather is best in July and August. Children should be able to enjoy the best time of the year out of the classroom. Thank you for . your-time and attention, Mibh6lle Langbfels January 30, 2013 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 50"' St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor, This past Fall, I corresponded with the Council and the HRRC regarding the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, and urged that the Council adopt a resolution similar to those approved in Duluth, St. Paul and Minneapolis. This subject was well received by many of the Council members and I understand that the HRRC did put forward a resolution however it was tabled as the Council was also working on other resolutions addressing the two proposed State Constitutional amendments. I certainly appreciate that those took precedence over something as global as this issue. Since that time other efforts have borne fruit at the State Legislature, where Senator John Marty has introduced a Resolution (SF17) which petitions the Congress to introduce an Amendment to the US Constitution stipulating that: "Corporations are not People and Money is not Speech ". Representatives Raymond Dehn and Paul Rosenthal will, this week, introduce an identical resolution in the House (HF # not yet assigned). Both of these resolutions call on the Congress to address the outcome of this SCOTUS decision either by creating the Amendment, or calling a Constitutional Convention which will address the issue. I would like to propose that Council could take further action on this topic by collectively or individually supporting the Resolutions in the Legislature. The Senate Judiciary Committee has not yet scheduled this for debate, and we are urging them to do so. Your 'good offices' could also assist in moving these resolutions through the appropriate committees. As you are, no doubt, well aware, the amount of non - transparent spending in the November elections, at all levels, was staggering and the general public is rightfully concerned that our elections are more like auctions than democratic elections by "We the People ". I ur ou to consider what further actions the council could take and I thank you for doing so. Sin er ly, Q Laird W. Beaver 5624 Melody Lake Drive Edina, Minn. 55436 Attachments: SF 17 12/07 /12 REVISOR RUvUNB 13 -0052 SENATE STATE OF MINNESOTA EIGHTY-EIGHTH LEGISLATURE (SENATE AUTHORS: MARTY, Dable, Clausen, Eaton and Dibble) DATE D-PG OFFICIAL STATUS 01/10/2013 Introduction and first reading Referred to Judiciary r 1.1 A joint resolution as introduced S.F. No. 17 1.2 requesting that Congress propose a constitutional amendment and, if Congress does 1.3 not propose an amendment, applying to Congress to call a constitutional convention 1.4 to propose an amendment clarifying that the rights protected under the Constitution 1.5 are the rights of natural persons and not the rights of artificial entities and that 1.6 spending money'to influence elections is not speech under the First Amendment. 1.7 WHEREAS, under Article V of the Constitution of the United States, the Congress, 1.8 whenever two- thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to the 1.9 Constitution; and 1.10 WHEREAS, under Article V of the Constitution of the United States, the Congress, on 1.11 the application of the legislatures of two- thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for 1.12 proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States that shall be valid to all intents 1.13 and purposes if ratified by the legislatures of three- fourths of the several states, or by conventions 1.14 in three- fourths thereof, as one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by Congress; Lis NOW, THEREFORE, 1.16 BE IT RESOLVED by the Legislature of the State of Minnesota that it requests that 1.17 Congress propose an amendment to the Constitution that shall substantially read as follows: 1.18 ,(1) The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural 1.19 persons only. 1.20 (2) Artificial entities, such as corporations, limited liability companies, and other entities, 1.21 established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state shall have no rights 1.22 under this Constitution and are subject to regulation by the People, through Federal, State, or 1.23 local law. 1 12/07/12 REVISOR JRM/NB 13 -0052 as introduced 2.1 (3) The privileges of artificial entities shall be determined by the People, through Federal, 2.2 State, or local law, and shall not be construed to be inherent or inalienable. 2.3 (4) Federal, State, and local government shall regulate, limit, or prohibit contributions and 2.4 expenditures, including a candidate's own contributions and expenditures, to ensure that all 2.5 citizens, regardless of their economic status, have access to the political process, and that no 2.6 person gains, as a result of their money, substantially more access or ability to influence in any 2.7 way th e election of any candidate for public office or any ballot measure. 2.8 (5) Federal, State, and local government shall require that any permissible contributions 2.9 and expenditures be publicly disclosed. 2.10 (6) The judiciary shall not construe the spending of money to influence elections to be 2.11 speech under the 1st Amendment. 2.12 (7) Nothing contained in this amendment shall be construed to abridge the freedom of 2.13 the press." 2.14 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if Congress does not propose the amendment language 2.15 or substantially similar amendment language as contained in this resolution, the Legislature of the 2.16 State of Minnesota applies to the Congress of the United States to call a constitutional convention 2.17 for the purpose of proposing the amendment language or substantially similar amendment language 2.19 as contained in this resolution as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and 2.19 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature of the State of Minnesota and the 2.20 people of Minnesota demand that if Congress does not propose the amendment language in this 2.21 resolution and if at least two- thirds of state legislatures have applied to Congress to call for a 2.22 constitutional convention to adopt the same or substantially similar constitutional amendment 2.23 language contained in this resolution, then the Congress must exercise its constitutional duty to 2.24 call a constitutional convention, and that the constitutional convention shall be called within six 2.25 months from the date that at least two- thirds of state legislatures have made the same or similar 2.26 application to Congress; and 2.27 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature of the State of Minnesota calls on other 2.28 states to join with the Legislature of the State of Minnesota in this action by passing the same 2.29 or similar resolutions; and 2.30 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of State of Minnesota is directed to 2.31 prepare copies of this resolution and transmit them to the Speaker and the Clerk of the United 2 42/07/12 REVISOR - JRM/NB __ .13 -0052 _ as introduced 3.1 States House of Representatives, the President and the Secretary of the United States Senate, the 3.2 United States Secretary of State, and Minnesota's Senators and Representatives in Congress. 3 r,, fI MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 19, 2012 7:30 AM 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Goergen called the meeting to order at 7:30 am. U. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Members Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Kojetin, Lefler, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz, Schulstad, and Goergen. Staff in attendance: Kristen Aarsvold, Edina Park and Recreation Department Supervisor Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion by Member Kojetin and seconded by Member Lonsbury to approve the meeting agenda, as presented. Ayes: Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Kojetin, Lefler, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz, and Goergen. Motion carried. Invited guest: Denny Schulstad IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Member Kojetin and seconded by Member Reed to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of the June 15, 2012 Veterans Memorial Committee Meeting Minutes. Ayes: Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Kojetin, Lefler, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz, and Goergen. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no members of the general public present at the meeting. Vl. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS A. FUNDRAISING /TREASURER Chairman Goergen advised that the purpose of the meeting today was to bring the group back on track after not meeting for the past few months and discuss fundraising. 1. Donation balance at Edina Foundation 2. Review presentations previously made to potential substantial donors. Follow up communications to those who did not contribute 3. Status of contacts by Richard Olson and Denny Schulstad to potential donors. Plan for making presentations to these individuals 4. Contacts with other potential donors (not personally known by Schulstad or any member of the Committee) 5. Expanding fundraising efforts beyond substantial donors to businesses located /based in Edina 6. Expand efforts to Edina community in general 7. Consider utilizing a professional fundraising organization. Costs involved 8. Other fundraising .ideas Chairman Goergen reviewed the two large pledges that had been received, one from a resident that would like to remain anonymous from the public with a donation of $100,000 and the Rotary pledge of $20,000 over the'next three years. He advised that since July two more donations totaling $700 had been received and -reviewed the fund balance. He also reviewed donations received from other organizations including the Edina Foundation. He reported that the donation presentation had been given to seven groups. Member Lonsbury stated that it would be helpful to know the amount needed in cash for the project, as some of the construction companies are willing to donate their time and /or materials. He stated that it may be helpful to show the "in kind" donations, as well as the pledges that have been received, in order to solicit additional donors. Schulstad stated that he has spoken with Krauss Anderson representatives. and provided an update, noting that they are waiting for the specifications on the project before they can move _forward. He confirmed that they would like to work with the Committee and provide a good price. Member Kojetin suggested that the bid documents be drafted by the architect so that information will be available for others to review, such as Krauss Anderson. Kristen Aarsvold introduced herself to the Committee and noted that she has worked on the Veteran's Parade and Dinner for the past several years and will continue to take over the responsibilities of Mr. Keprios in regard to the Committee until the memorial is built. Member Schwartz noted that the figures needed for the memorial should be listed equally everywhere, including the City website, and confirmed that figure to be $450,000. Mrs. Aarsvold confirmed that she could update the figure on the City website. Chairman Goergen believed that Mr. Keprios was working on a, contract document for the architectural services prior to his illness and noted that those items had been placed on hold since that time. Member Reed questioned if the process with the architect could begin prior to Mr. Keprios returning to work. Member Christiaansen provided an update on the process with the architect, noting that he believed the contract was ready and just required signatures. Member Cardarelle expressed frustration that the contract with the architect has not yet been signed and believed that the Committee should move forward with that. fj* Mrs. Aarsvold stated that Mr. Keprios was unsure as to the length of time that he would be out of the office but noted that he will return to work on Monday and could go ahead with obtaining signatures on the contract. Member Lonsbury described the next steps, noting that after Mr. Keprios returns to work, the contract could be signed and the bid documents could then be developed that would assist in moving the process forward and obtaining the actual amount of funding that will be needed to fund the project. Mrs. Aarsvold mentioned that Veteran's Day is coming up soon and questioned the type of marketing that should be done. Member Lonsbury indicated that the Committee needs to first identify the game plan for fundraising and then decide if marketing should be done in conjunction with Veteran's Day. He noted that the Committee should first ensure that everything is in line and updates could be given prior to going public. He explained that that you would only go to the newspapers if the strategy is to obtain small donations. He stated that if the desire is to focus on large donors prior to year end, you would want to hold off on bringing the matter public. Chairperson Goergen- provided an update on attempts to gain large donations. He advised that of the seven presentations that were completed, only two donations were received. He questioned if the Committee should contacted once again to follow -up. Member Schwartz identified a potential donor that could be followed up with. Member Reed identified two additional potential donors that could be reached out to. Schulstad provided insight on a Veteran's memorial, which was constructed at the University of Minnesota. He explained that this fundraising effort is different and requires a different strategy. He suggested possibly building the memorial in stages, where donors could be asked to contribute funds for specific aspects of the project, such as benches or the eagle. He noted that some donors do not want to contribute unless they know the project will be built. Chairperson Goergen stated that the City Council is requiring all the funds to be received prior to construction. Member Lonsbury stated that if the project is intentional and well designed, he believed the City Council would support staging of the construction, noting that the eagle monument could be constructed first, with benches and the plaza to come as additional funding is received. Chairman Goergen provided an update on the artist for the project, noting that his cost estimate was originally $40,000 but then was raised to a total of $83,000. He advised that the artist had already been paid $20,000 for his beginning work on the project. Schulstad noted that the Committee may already have the funding to construct the monument with the eagle at this time, especially when the "in kind" donations are considered. Member Lefler stated that the Committee has a donor that is willing to contribute $100,000. He suggested possibility of the donor holding an open house event at which more potential donors could be solicited. Chairman Goergen advised of potential fundraising opportunities that Members Schulstad and Olson could continue to reach out to. He stated that the Committee would need to decide whether to simply continue on the level of fundraising that they have been, or whether to reach out to the newspapers to begin obtaining the smaller donations. Mrs. Aarsvold suggested holding a Veteran's Day lunch. Member Cardarelle advised that the Edina Rotary is going to hold a lunch on Veteran's Day, which will be attended by five other Rotary clubs. He believed that a presentation could be given at that event. Chairman Goergen questioned what results that would bring as the Rotary has already pledged a donation of $20,000. He advised that the group has not received any response from veterans, other than a $25 donation from a spouse of a veteran. Member Kojetin stated that the Edina American Legion is dissolving and would possibly provide a donation. Member Lonsbury stated that it is clear that the Committee does not have a plan for fundraising. He stated that discussion always goes around to possible contacts rather than a focused plan. Chairman Goergen stated that the plan is to contact potential donors. Member Lonsbury stated that he would like to see an actual plan and advised that if the only plan is to contact potential donors; that is not a plan. Chairman Goergen stated that this was the first phase of fundraising, which the Committee is still in. He noted that Member Olson has suggested that a large donor assist in the formation of a Subcommittee, which could assist in obtaining donations. Schulstad provided input on the process for obtaining donations for the University of Minnesota project, confirming that the general public was not brought into that process. Mrs. Aarsvold believed that this time of year would be a great time to host a dinner, or event, possibly hosted by the large donor to solicit additional donations. Schulstad advised that the Committee only has one large donor and stated that donor would not be comfortable hosting an event of that nature. He stated that if there were two of three champions of this that live in Edina, it would make the process much easier. Mrs. Aarsvold questioned if the Committee could then host the event. .i Chairman Goergen stated that the potential donors on the list would not respond to an event of that nature. He agreed that the Committee needs that champion for fundraising and explained that is why Member Olson suggested possibly changing directions with the public marketing. Mrs. Aarsvold questioned if it would be the time to send letters to the potential donors to get the ball rolling again. Member Lefler stated that if nothing happens.and there is no decision, efforts will stall. Schulstad stated that it would be beneficial to have the eagle monument built with the funds pledged and then solicit for additional funds. Member Kojetin agreed. Member Reed stated that on the other side, people may think the eagle monument is sufficient and then not feel additional pledges are necessary. Member Lefler left the meeting at 8:41 a.m. Member Reed stated that he has heard interest in people donating smaller amounts and did not think those opportunities should be missed. Member Schwartz stated that when he did the survey of veterans living in Edina he assumed that the community was aware of the Edina Veterans project but learned that residents were not aware. He stated that he did not believe that it would hurt the group to publicize the project. He advised that the Committee would not necessarily ask for funds, but simply get the word, out about the project. Mrs. Aarsvold stated that she would assist in meeting with potential donors and believed that in the next month the group could finish up contacts with potential donors. B. MARKETING /COMMUNITY RELATIONS 1. Utilization of brochures prepared by John Lonsbury and Communications Department 2. Provide article on memorial prepared by Marshall Schwartz to Edina publications /newspaper 3. Marketing ideas in conjunction with Veterans Day (November 11, 2012) 4. Other marketing ideas Member Schwartz advised of an event he will be speaking at on November 14th at the Edina Senior Center to bring awareness to the project. He stated that he also drafted an article to be considered by the Committee for local publication, which discusses the names and stories of those that will be included in the Veterans memorial. Member Reed proposed that some members of the Committee meet to refocus the fundraising efforts. He also suggested that efforts continue with the architect and determining the "in kind" donations. Member Kojetin agreed that it would be beneficial to have a clear plan, especially in the case that the Committee needs to go back to the Council. Chairman Goergen agreed that he could meet with Members Lonsbury and Olson as well as Mrs. Aarsvold and Mr. Keprios to develop a clear plan. He questioned what should occur in conjunction with Veteran's Day, whether the article should be printed or the mock up memorial should be placed in the park again. Member Reed stated that the more awareness that is brought, the better. He noted that there would possibly be snow on Veteran's Day, which could affect the mock up display in the park. Member Schwartz stated that he has a display, which he could bring to City Hall for display during the election. Chairman Goergen suggested. using a thermometer type fundraising tool, which could be displayed at City Hall to show the fundraising efforts. Schulstad stated that there are answers that would need to be determined in regard to possibly constructing the memorial in stages, whether the Committee would like to do that, whether the donor would .support that, and whether the Council would support that. Motion by Member Schwartz and seconded by Member Kojetin to approve the construction of the memorial in phases, beginning with the eagle monument. Further discussion: Member Lonsbury stated that in his mind a plan would need to first be developed. He noted that a deadline could be set, if the funds are not raised by this date, the group could begin with the phased construction. Member Reed stated that he believed that it would be defeatist to make that kind of decision at this time. Chairman Goergen agreed that it is too early to move to that plan of phased construction. Motion withdrawn by Members Schwartz and Kojetin. Mrs. Aarsvold questioned the direction for the communications department and whether the Committee would like a short press release regarding the Committee and the memorial. Member Cardarelle left the meeting at 8:59 a.m. Member Lonsbury stated that it could be beneficial to have a plan for running articles, such as each month an article would be drafted and printed by the communications department. He stated that if there is only one article, such as that drafted by Member Schwartz, what would occur after that article runs. He also noted that an article could bring attention as to what the Committee has done. He stated that he would support an article that simply focuses on the veterans and not the memorial, but did not think it 'f would be beneficial to draw unwanted attention. He stated that it would not take much effort to refocus the article drafted by Member Schwartz on simply the veterans. Mrs. Aarsvold stated that a member of the communications department is willing to sit down with members from the Committee to develop a communications plan and timeline. She confirmed that an article can be drafted for November that would focus on the veterans, not specifically the memorial, and could also refer readers to the website. Member Schwartz agreed that the communications department could rewrite the article for publication. Member Lonsbury commented it may be beneficial for Chairperson Goergen to reach out to a specific individual in regard to the actions of the Committee. C. RESEARCH (KIAs) No report. D. DESIGN /ARCHITECTURE No comments made. Meeting adjourned at 9:10 a.m. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 5, 2013 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received after the packets were delivered to you. No action is necessary. City of Edina 4801 W. 50`� St Edina, MN 55424 H�v � _ �O a PORp`TF� • 1888 Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Q Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received after the packets were delivered to you. No action is necessary. City of Edina 4801 W. 50`� St Edina, MN 55424 H�v � _ �O a PORp`TF� • 1888 February 3, 2013- Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, I am writing as Chair of the Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee (NISC) to support Bruce Carlson's concerns regarding the request of Sunnyslope residents to be separated from the Greater Country Club Neighborhood. While they are entitled to make this request, and it is within your power to grant it, I share Bruce's concern that this may open a "Pandora's box" of similar requests from small areas and associations throughout the City. Our Final Report'and Recommendations outlined the extensive citizen participation process whereby this and other issues were extensively discussed over a one year time period. In our decision to be inclusive rather than exclusive we, including members of numerous other small neighborhoods and associations, set larger, rather than smaller, boundaries for City Recognized Neighborhood Associations (CRNA). We did this to facilitate Council policies, procedures, and communications with CRNAs. We also emphasized that small neighborhood associations of all kinds will continue to be recognized and to function within the larger CRNA boundaries. Thank you for providing NISC members with the opportunity to serve the City of Edina in this important endeavor. Sincerely, Hope Melton Chair, Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee February 1, 2013 City Council Members, NISC Members, Karen Kurt After attending and participating in the Neighborhood Public Hearing on January 22, I felt compelled to make some observations and comments. I am not speaking on behalf of the Committee, as our task is complete, however, I'm copying them on this correspondence so they can respond accordingly as they deem appropriate. As you know, we met twice a month for a year. We planned and implemented a thoughtful, collaborative and inclusive process. We had many people and "current" neighborhood representatives express their concerns and desires, some were adopted, some were not. Most efforts to influence were early in the process, persistent, thoughtful, and coordinated, one such example is the "existing" Bredesen Park Neighborhood. Representatives of Bredesen Park came to every Public meeting and communicated to us personally, through surveys and with `on -line' feedback. Bredesen Park has twice,as many parcels as " Sunnyslope," they have an established Association and they let us know consistently for a year that they would like to be recognized and split off on their own. By all rationale they easily could be separated from "Londonderry." They also made comments `on -line' (Dick Crockett), after we completed our committee work, that the name Londonderry, "has no meaning to them." At this time, I actually agree with their assessment of the name "Londonderry" and I believe Nine Mile Creek or Bredesen Park would be better options. Anyway, this group did not get either of their requests adopted. There are many other examples throughout Edina and just in the Northwest Quadrant, we have Fox Meadow, Brookside Heights, Rolling Green, Hilldale, Edina Highlands Association to name of few. I find great irony in the vocal few that spoke for the " Sunnyslope" area to be exclusive and separate. Their cohesive, intimate group never gained knowledge in a year about this process, but when they did, they used their network to raise concerns. Perhaps, if Sunnyslope were part of a larger network they would be connected earlier to learn about meaningful issues going on across the street and in their greater area. Does "can't see the forest through the trees" apply? It would be inequitable if Sunnyslope's request is accepted at this time without granting the same to the many others that have persistently and actively been involved throughout this process. Regarding the existing signage and monuments in many neighborhoods, including Sunnyslope, this is an issue which is currently being managed somehow within the City and I assume will continue. Long established neighborhoods are not going to cease and you can be sure that Realtors will continue to use names such as: Rolling Green, Sunnyslope, South Harriet Park, Brucewood, Hilldale, Viking Hills, Chapel Hill, Nob Hill etc. as their identifiers in listing and selling properties. The fact that these charming, intimate names, areas and neighborhoods will exist within a larger "City Recognized Neighborhood" will not strip them of their established identity and community. I believe the larger, issue, for your consideration at this time, is the merit to proceed with so many questions, situations and nuances to be resolved, apparently, by policies and procedures. I know City Staff has been working on these and we were briefly exposed to them, however, I'm sure a similar collaborative process would be beneficial in the establishment of the "rules of the game" going forward. Any inequitable tweaks at this time would not be a very sunny slope but rather a "Slipperyslope." Sincerely, Bruce Carlson Neighborhood Identification Steering Committee Member Susan Howl Dear City Council: I am writing you on behave of many of My Edina neighbors that are Totality Against the "Name your Neighborhood Project ". This is a Bad Idea! Edina is one of the premier suburbs of the Twin cities and already has many diverse and historical neighborhoods. By creating these definitive lines will only create a divide in neighborhoods and the haves and have -nots. This will hurt Edina in' the long run. From what I can tell, the main reason for the new boundaries is to provide neighborhoods with information quicker. In an age of email, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, why do we need a better way of communication? The city is already able to get information to those residents who want it very quickly. Thank You John & Mary Lohmann 5220 W. 56`h St Jon & Ann Reissner Jon & Ann Stedman Bill Jenkins Sharon Hierlmaier John & Babette Bean David Braun Bob Huge Scott & Stacia Richardsen Todd & Karin Miller Jeff & Amy Bison Mike & Carla Bodeen Will & Loti Steinke Chris Moquist Dr. Jeff Sanderson Dan Carson Tim & Kelly Flahery Scott & Kayte Taylor John & Anne Lohmann John & Donna Ward Ian & Nancy Frykman Bill & Kathy Bailey Bill & Caryn Kelly Gary Wigness Susan Howl •- t Hello, In response to progress of the "Name your Neighborhood" project, as you are likely aware, there is public outcry as to the process and intent. The situation was recently mocked in MN Monthly (attached is the mocking map the magazine published). littp: / /blogs.citypages.com /blotter /2012/09/mn monthly helps edina name its neighborhoods including_boto xia and spraytanistan graphic.php The feedback'and community input process is one of the worst designed and poorly implemented I have ever encountered. It's time to admit it failed and completely re -haul the project. Telling citizens you want to hear from them, but then failing to listen reflects very poorly on our city's government our taxpayer dollars support. PROBLEMS: There is no confidence in the process within the community. First of all, the process for Edina residents to provide feedback is extremely arduous - everyone I have spoken said they tried, but gave up because it was confusing, time - consuming, and lacked clarity. Signing up for "Speak up Edina" took me at least 25 minutes - and I'm fairly tech savvy. The Facebook page is useless, none of the links work. There is no transparency into how many residents from each area or as a whole community, via the various "communication options ", have actually provided feedback. Was the community input rate 40% or less than 1%? My guess is the latter, and no decision that effects all residents should be made based on a map designed by around I% of the community. Claims that it was information was posted in many places does nothing to change the fact that the communication and feedback process failed completely resulting in very low feedback results. The process failed, the citizens did not. Why are participation, feedback, responses numbers and percentages not published anywhere? This process should be transparent - gaining community confidence. Providing an option for those submitting feedback to remain anonymous, as in voting, and as to not create friction among neighbors and friends who may have differing opinions is critical; however, the majority should rule, and that majority should be set at least as 15 - 20% of total Edina resident feedback. What defines the "majority" should be defined and posted/shared as a project goal before any maps are finalized and submitted for voting. Currently, the process seems to provide the opinions of a few influential citizens to make decisions for the majority of residents - under the pretense of being a "community feedback" based project. It's a faulty and flawed process. It's wrong. Keeping the. reasons of how the new maps were determined, . and based on how much feedback, has been kept under wraps. Hence, there is suspicion, frustration, and a belief the our local government is acting the wishes of a few well- connected individuals with personal agendas, and wasting time and money. Additionally, feedback and comments have been deleted on the city site, why? I noted several people commented on the deletion of these comments! TRANSPARENCY: Our current president, President Obama, very accurately sums up the importance of transparency in government in his Presidential Agenda: "Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies SUBJECT: Transparency and open Government My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government. Government should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing. Information maintained by the Federal Government is a national asset. My Administration will take appropriate action, consistent with law and policy, to disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use. Executive departments and agencies should harness new technologies to put information about their operations and decisions online and readily available to the public. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public feedback to identify information of greatest use to the public. Government should be participatory. Public engagement enhances the Government's effectiveness and improves the quality of its decisions. Knowledge is widely dispersed in society, and public officials benefit from having access to that dispersed knowledge. Executive departments and agencies should offer Americans increased opportunities to participate in policymaking and to provide their Government with the benefits of their collective expertise and information. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public input on how we can increase and improve opportunities for public participation in Government........ http: / /www.whitehouse.gov /the press office fTransparencvand Open Government SOLUTION: Create confidence through transparency, better and more effective communication, and create easy to use community feedback options A simple quick and easy online survey (zoomerang etc.) asking simple questions and distributed throughout all communication vehicles and a link to the survey also added to officials signature line would bring in much feedback and easy to summarize and evaluate the feedback. For the areas in dispute, a mail survey (many older residents don't use the internet) would be highly effective, widely utilized, and canvass the residents in Edina. Specific to the Minnehaha Woods / Arden Park Map: This is the area where I live (North of 54th on Brookside). Why was the new dividing line not available online for feedback prior to the proposed "Final" map ?? In reviewing at all of the feedback and meetings, I don't see where anyone, other than one woman living North of 54th on the West side of the creek, who supported dividing the Arden Hill and the Minnehaha Woods area at 54th. It does not make any sense. If the area is to be divided, it should be at the creek, a natural dividing. Our neighborhood is a walking neighborhood, there is not natural boundary at 54th - in fact, the area West of the creek are all continuous streets from 52nd to down to 56 or 58. The only reason to divide the area previous know as "South Harriet Park" at 54th is about dividing the seemingly "Have Mores" to the "Have Less than the Have Mores ". It seem like a property value based decision. Please don't allow such an obvious mapping ploy to create artificial boundaries. This is NOT the purpose or the mission of this project. So why have all of the previous maps listed for consideration and feedback for this area been eliminated and a new, unsupported version now the "official version "? Who made this decision and why? No explanation has been offered. Is really the voice of one to determine the fate of ALL in this area? The 54th division is completely irrational. • Our children go to the same school, and walk to each other's home's to play just a block South or North. • All share Arden Park and the creek as the centerpiece C The distance between the houses on the East and West side of Minnehaha home is over 1/2 mile. The distance beween the homes North of 54th and South of 54th is about 20 feet. • The entire neighborhood is cohesive walking neighborhood. • Issues such as break -ins, too many garbage trucks creating unsafe conditions for children at bus stops, effect all homes in this area similarly. My suggestion and that of all I have spoken to is to divide the neighborhood at the creek - or better yet, do not divide it at all. Can you provide a response as to why this decision was made, by whom, and based on how many households input? Please demonstrate to the Edina community that government does represent all of it's citizens, communicates effectively, and is transparent in it's actions, decisions, goals vs. actual, admitting failure, and financials. Thank you, Elizabeth Susan Howl Dear Edina City Council, We are writing today to express our viewpoint concerning the Slidell development planned in the Morningside neighborhood. We support the option of the cul -de -sac plan, and do not support placing a through street in this property. a. Creating a through street here would create irreversible environmental harm to the site, resulting in the destruction of about 40% of the site's.old growth trees, reduce the carbon sink, and dig into an existing hillside, potentially causing major erosion. Edina already has enough land paved over, and one of the tenants of the City's Living Streets program is reduce pavement where not required. b. There is an existing through street only 200' +/- to the east of the site, Lynn Avenue, for neighborhood connectivity to Little Street north of the site. This street also has a sidewalk for neighborhood use. Any new street through this site would only be duplicative of the existing street network. c. Although there are not true cul -de -sac's in the neighborhood, there are already dead -end streets at Oakdale Ave and West 45`h Street, south of the site, that effectively already function as a cul -de -sac, without the circular turnaround. d. There should also be a public sidewalk on the cul -de -sac road, and we would support minimizing the new road width in concert with the Living Streets program.. 2. We are also in support of having the new homes along Morningside Road face Morningside Road, versus having a side view of the house along Morningside Road. This appears to be something that can easily be done with the Slidell's preferred site plan, although it might make for some minor lot depth variances similar to the ones already being asked for by the applicant. One of our concerns is that the new side facing home would put up a fence along the entire property, as was done by the new homeowner at the SEQ of Grimes and Morningside Road, across from the Morningside Church. Homes facing Morningside was also be in more in -line with the existing homes across the street and the current property at 4412 Morningside Road (the "Hardy Home ") 3. We would also like to commend Frank Slidell and his family for being open and receptive to neighborhood feedback, and truly appreciate the hard work they have put into developing this one of a kind property to fit into the existing neighborhood. Their tree conservation proposal is also greatly appreciated. We absolutely adore our neighborhood and believe this development will be a great addition. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Michael & Stephanie Platteter Morningside Residents 4304 Branson Street (, i ;r...Ci .. PI .rl ;I Q rf *;C ( ?. ii a 74 0 i' 1 , i' l , ! i; % _., 1 Susan Howl - - Dear Mr. Neal and Mayor Hovland: A few weeks ago, Mayor Hovland's appeared at the.MSP Noise Oversight Committee. Mayor Hovland, I thought, seemed to be saying Edina would get more than its fair share of overflights and noise unless they were seated on the NOC. It would be better to skip NOC and engage Commissioner Pelein or her successor. Edina has other, more important problems with things as they are at MSP. Edina, like the rest of the Twin Cities Metro, lacks safe, sufficient, and affordable air transportation services. Fares are: high due,to limited supply and lack of airline competition; MSP fees are high, because costs-are high for maintaining services at unnecessarily high levels during daily peaks and because of the capital cost of surplds. capacity. SMAAC has been working with Rep. Ellison and others in Washington on the topic Rates and Safety at MSP. Our view is that high rates are not needed for safe, sufficient and affordable air service and will cost more than moderate rates as originally planned for MSP Expansion in 1998. The procedural changes FAA made in late 2010 to "reduce air crossings" routed lower- flying aircraft over neighborhoods in South Minneapolis that were previously not under departures from the North r Parallel Runway. Airlines soon switched departures to use the North Parallel more often because the turns saved time for flights headed east. Flights with South or West destinations now use R30L. more often but flights remain equally balanced on the parallel runways. Although there are flights over Edina, sometimes loud enough to be annoying, the current issue (PBN routes) adds noise and switches impacts from insulated areas to new, un- insulated areas nearer the airport than Edina. The cities around MSP have more in common with each other than they do with the industry reps on NOC. MAC probably created NOC to divert citizens' and neighborhoods' concerns of any kind through the City Members of NOC. This isolates the MAC 3 ways: Any compliant to a NOC member is assumed to be about noise (not high fees, not about traffic congestion at the terminals, not safety, delays. etc: NOC only meets every other month and the Chairs rotate. Getting on an agenda can take 4 months; Each City works for a lesser share of noise more than for less noise. In an attempt to moderate the new noise impacts, but maintain "efficiency" (high rates, over 150 operations per hour) and the new departure procedures, FAA assigned 4 departure headings off the North parallel runway in 2011. But the actual flight routes were affected by loads, winds, and timing and intensified air traffic control communications with the pilots and each other. So now FAA is proposing "RNAV /PBN" routes that use navigation aids linked to flight plans and autopilots to, hopefully, keep at least minimum separations and less intense ATC. We doubt that PBN routes can be safely implemented in the short term, but we also oppose high rates and more operations at "separation minima" as planned by FAA. You can find a lot more about all of this at www.auiettheskies.orci or feel free to call me at 520.229.7657 (Cell) / Jim Spensley Minneapolis Susan Howl ' From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 8:02 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Don't Trash the Phonebook Website 'i- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r V,- 952-927-8861 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 IbiunnoCa)EdinaMN.gov i www.EdinaMN. -g ov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Liz McLoone rmailto :lizmCaconservationminnesota .oral Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 5:20 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Don't Trash the Phonebook Website Greetings Mayor Hovland. I'm not sure if you remember meeting me last fall, but I was running the Barnes races for the last couple of months of the campaign. Now I am working with Conservation Minnesota (CM) on promoting a couple of their recycling projects. Conservation Minnesota is a non - profit environmental advocacy organization that emphasizes on serving our members based on what issues are most important to them. Reducing waste and increasing Minnesota's recycling rate is one of those top issues. You may have seen the recent MPR piece regarding Minnesota's recycling rate of only 41 %. http/Iminnesota publicradio org/displaylweb /2013/01/06/ environment /minn - recycling- trends Here at CM, we are committed to doing whatever we can to. both raise that number and reduce the amount of recyclable materials that go in landfills. One of the projects we are working on is to promote our partnership with phonebook companies to encourage residents to opt out of receiving phonebooks. The opt out service is offered at http: / /www.donttrashthephonebook.org (DTPB.org). At this site folks can either find a recycling facility near them that will accept their phonebook(s), or they can opt out of receiving multiple phonebooks at their home. I'm interested in discussing whether Edina would consider providing residents with access to this website. Below I have listed the various ways we are working with municipalities to accomplish this goal would be happy to discuss this with you further, please let me know if you're available to meet or visit over the phone. Thank you for your consideration, Liz McLoone Project Manager Conservation Minnesota Office: 612 - 767 -2444 Cell: 651 - 600 -5549 http: / /www.conservationminnesota.or� Don't Trash the Phonebook Promotional Options: Including the link to DTPB.org on the recycling and waste handling instruction pages of your city website. Including the link to DTPB.org in annual recycling instructions /schedules mailed to residents each year (if applicable). Including a link to DTPB.org, and brief explanation of the service, on municipal service and trash collection bills sent to local residents. A joint announcement of partnership /initiative to local media to inform residents and spur more interest in our joint effort. MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS January 9, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Grabiel called the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission to order at 7:00 PM. II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Commissioners Forrest, Schroeder, Kilberg, Potts, Platteter, Cherkassky, Fischer, Carpenter, Staunton, Grabiel Members absent: Scherer III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Meeting Agenda was approved as submitted. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEMS Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the December 12, 2012, meeting minutes. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No comment. VI. PUBLIC HEARING A. Variance. Cooke. 6844 Point Drive, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property is a corner lot located north of Dunberry Lane and west of Point Drive consisting of a rambler with an attached two car garage. The property owner is hoping to add a garage stall to the west, a small addition to the back of the home and a second story addition above the first floor Page 1 of 10 Aaker explained that the property is subjected to two front yard setbacks because there are adjacent homes fronting both Dunberry Lane, (south), and Point Drive, (east). The subject home is "lined up" with the home to the north along Point Drive, however, is much farther south towards Dunberry Lane than the home to the west. Aaker pointed out ordinance allows 200 square feet of additional encroachment per built floor at the existing nonconforming setback. The ordinance requires that additions in excess of 200 square feet must maintain the required setbacks. The home conforms to all of the setback requirements with the exception of the required setback from Dunberry Lane. The first floor requires a variance to allow 231 square feet of additional encroachment beyond the 200 square feet allowed by ordinance, however, all of the second floor is required to comply with setback since there is no 2nd floor currently. The front yard setback of the home to the west is 77.5 feet from Dunberry Lane. The subject home provides 31.5 foot setback from Dunberry Lane. Any improvement on the subject property to within the existing nonconforming 31.5 foot setback from Dunberry requires a 46 foot setback variance. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of the variance based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is consistent with existing conditions and matches the nonconforming setback of the existing home. 3) The imposed setbacks severely limit design opportunity. The intent of the ordinance is to provide adequate spacing from the street. The proposed home will match the setback of the existing home that has been located on the lot since 1957. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans: Survey date stamped: December 17, 2012 Building plans and elevations date stamped: December 11, 2012. Appearing for the Applicant Matt Cooke Page 2 of 10 k tl Applicant Presentation Mr. Cooke addressed the Commission and informed them he agrees with the findings and conditions established in the staff report. Cooke explained when he first purchased his house he didn't think there would be a problem extending the garage and found out otherwise during the permitting process. Discussion Chair Grabiel asked Planner Aaker if the proposed garage extension complies with the required side yard setback. Aaker responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant if he ever considered recessing the new garage bay. Mr. Cooke responded that option wasn't considered; however, he stated he's not averse to recessing the bay. Chair Grabiel opened the public hearing. Public Comment Tim Wood, appearing for his mother Cheryl Wood, 4420 Dunberry Lane, said his mother was concerned that her clear view would be compromised as she backs out of the garage by this addition. Wood noted their driveway slopes and with a reduced view inclement conditions may cause her to slide not allowing her adequate "stop" time. Chair Grabiel thanked Mr. Wood and asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Platteter commented that he likes the suggestion of recessing the third garage stall, adding that recessing that stall would help the adjacent neighbor with site lines. Commissioner Carpenter stated he can support the request either way, adding if the applicant is willing to make that adjustment and recess the third garage stall that's a bonus. Commissioner Staunton asked Mr. Cooke his plan for the third garage stall. Mr. Cooke responded that the additional stall would be used for storage. Staunton asked Mr. Cooke if he would be willing to recess the third stall. Cooke responded in the affirmative adding the third stall has its own garage door. Commissioner Fischer asked Planner Aaker the setback from the west property line (Mrs. Wood's property). Planner Aaker responded the subject property maintains a 25 -foot setback Page 3 of 10 from that common property line. Commissioner Schroeder noted there is the possibility that by recessing the garage an additional variance could be required. Schroder pointed out the setback is already at the minimum 25 -feet. Chair Grabiel commented that it is difficult to rework a plan during a meeting; however he suggested to the applicant if it's possible recess the garage. Commissioner Kilberg commented if he could vote, for consistency, he would vote in favor of the variance as proposed. Commissioners agreed the applicant could recess the garage if it works within the ordinance requirements. Motion Commissioner Fischer moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Fischer further noted that the proposed third garage is 25 -feet from the adjacent neighbor; not 5 -feet. Commissioner Staunton seconded the motion. Ayes; Schroeder, Potts, Platteter, Carpenter, Staunton Fischer, Grabiel. Nay; Forrest. Motion carried. B. Variance. Cragg. 5024 Bruce Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property, is located at the end of Bruce Place Cul -de -sac and backs up to Minnehaha Creek. The .existing home on the property was built in 1940, consists of two story home with an attached two car garage, The existing home is nonconforming regarding.the required 50 foot setback from Minnehaha Creek. The existing home is located 40.38 feet from the edge of Minnehaha Creek or 9.62 feet closer than allowed by ordinance. At the time the home was built there were different setback requirements in place allowing structures to be closer to water bodies than current city code allows. The zoning ordinance was amended in the early 1990's changing the setback requirement from Minnehaha Creek to a 50 foot minimum setback. The change was required so the City of Edina would be consistent with the MN Department of Natural Resource's requirements. The ordinance change caused the current home, as well as many others along the Creek and other water bodies, to become nonconforming. The change doubled the setback previously required from Minnehaha Creek. The applicant is planning to tear -down the existing nonconforming home and replace it with a new two story home with an attached two car garage. The Page 4 of 10 applicant has indicated that the new home will conform to the entire ordinance requirements with the exception of the required setback from Minnehaha Creek. The new home is proposed to be closer to the creek than the existing home. The new home is proposed to be 34.04 feet from Minnehaha Creek or 6.34 feet closer to the creek than the existing home. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variance based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. It would appear however, that a new home could be designed to match the existing nonconforming setback of the home which would be a more reasonable variance to consider. 2) The proposal would not meet the required standards for a variance, because: • The proposed use of the property is not reasonable; as it will increase encroachment into the setback required and currently provided from Minnehaha Creek. • The practical difficulties in complying with the ordinances are the narrow building pad allowed by current standards and required setback from the Creek. Staff could perhaps support a request to maintain the existing nonconforming setback of the home from the Creek with new construction. Staff cannot support a request or identify difficulties with not matching the existing nonconforming creek setback. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. and Mrs. Cragg and Dan Murphy, architect. Discussion Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Aaker to clarify what's included when calculating setback from the creek. Planner Aaker responded everything is included when calculating setback from a water body. Commissioner Potts asked--Planner Aaker to go over the side yard setbacks. Planner Aaker explained that on the east the project meets the minimum 5 -foot side yard setback for .a. garage. Aaker said she had concern that the side yard setback on the west at the corner may not meet the minimum setback; however she was assured by the architect it would meet code. Aaker further explained that at this time the plans preliminary pending variance approval. Page 5 of 10 Commissioner Schroeder noted the mention of a buffer or berm along the edge of the creek and questioned what the pattern of development would be in that area; will there be turf, lawn plantings, what would be'there. Continuing, Schroeder asked the width of this "zone ". Mr. Murphy responded they haven't finalized the design of this "area ". .Chair Grabiel noted there are many properties in Edina that don't meet the mandated setback and asked Planner Aaker when the State changed the setback requirements did it allow for variances. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative, adding the City has the authority to grant variances. Applicant Presentation Dan Murphy addressed the Commission and said the plans as presented. are Preliminary and organic, adding their intention is to preserve the existing natural resources. Murphy also noted a buffer along the creek would also be included. Continuing, Murphy said to the best of their ability they tried to stay within the existing footprint to mini miie any impact. Concluding Murphy said in his opinion the variance as submitted doesn't go against the spirit of the Code. Mrs. Cragg explained their goal was to place to keep it "up" on the lot and as close to the location of the existing house as possible. She explained their lot slopes down and includes a wooded area, adding drainage from the street also flows down toward the creek. Cragg said their'intent is to plant native vegetation in this area that's good for water bodies.. Continuing, Cragg noted their plan is to run natural stone around the edge of the creek, reiterating they will plant wonderful native plants; it won't be just grass running all the way down to the creek bed. Cragg noted if the new house was placed farther to the west the house would block the neighbors view. She also reported this is one of the only areas to "get" a lawn; mower „through from front to back. Concluding, Cragg reiterated they don't want to impact anyone's sight lines; they love neighbors, adding the new house will not be going any closer toward the creek than the existing deck. Cragg said she truly believes the house as presented will fit. Chair Grabiel observed that he understands the new house will maintain the same setback; however replacing the deck with house in not the same. Discussion Commissioner Potts said he appreciates all the work submitted for this project, adding what he would like to see in more detail are plans and information on how the creek would be protected. Potts said in this instance pulling the house as close to the street as permitted makes the most sense and would have less impact on the creek. Mrs. Cragg reiterated their lot slopes and the goal is to keep the new house "up” and protect the views for the neighboring properties. She also added that aesthetically she Page 6 of 10 r believes it will look better in the proposed location. Commissioner Forrest said one area that concerns her is the impact this project will have on the creek, the existing vegetation and neighbors during the construction phase. Mr. Murphy explained that a substantial slit fence would be added along with all construction requirements established by. the. City. Murphy said the site would be continually monitored not only by the applicant but by the City and the Watershed District as well. Chair Grabiel opened the public hearing. Public Comment Todd Peterson 5034 Bruce Place told the Commission he supports the project as presented, adding in his opinion it's reasonable. He pointed out the "piece" requiring the variance won't even be seen from the front street. Concluding, Peterson said water run -off issues would be improved, reiterating he has no objection to the project as submitted, it's a reasonable request. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone would like to speak to this issue; being none, Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Staunton said one thing that strikes him about this lot is the "buildable area ". He noted lot coverage is 10% and if he calculated correctly the buildable area of this lot is only 13% when taking into account the flood plain, water body setback, and other setbacks. Staunton acknowledged this is an unusual situation, and an unusual oddly shaped lot. Continuing, Staunton said he is also curious about what's included in the landscaping plan along the creek and Commissioner Schroeder's point regarding plantings, size of "zone" etc. Concluding, Staunton said he understands the plans are preliminary; however, more information is needed. Commissioner Schroeder said the intent of the ordinance was to establish a setback that protects the creek as a natural resource. Schroeder added he is sensitive to this ordinance, reiterating its intent is to protect the natural resources. Continuing, Schroeder said he supports the setback of the new house; however stressed he wants to, see the materials, vegetation and measures used to protect this natural resource not only after the house is built but during the construction phase too. Mr. Murphy said he is working closely with the Minnehaha Watershed District and would also be complying with their requirements. Schroeder stated he envisions this "buffer area" as a permanent system. Page 7 of 10 A discussion ensued on City requirements and Watershed District requirements with Commissioners expressing they want to take the position of protecting the City's natural resources. Commissioner Potts reiterated what he would like to see is what their actual "plan" is to protect the shoreline, adding he understands that the Watershed District requirements would also be met. Commissioner Platteter said he is struggling with the deck vs. building, adding they . aren't the same thing. Platteter acknowledged the lot is difficult; however much still isn't known. He concluded the City's natural resource needs, to be protected. Commissioner Forrest asked if the Commission could define the size /width of a "filter" strip, at 7 -feet, 15 -feet. Commissioner Schroeder said that can be done; however, with what was presented to us we don't have enough information to do that. Commissioner Carpenter said he agrees with that comment, adding from the discussion so far it doesn't appear that the Commission has enough information about plantings, buffer, and length and size of (a) "strip ". Concluding, Carpenter said the Commission shouldn't act on what we don't have. Chair Grabiel said in his opinion all comments are well taken. He noted this proposal impacts a public resource and trying to decide how to "re -do" this during a meeting isn't best. Concluding Grabiel said this proposal needs more 'work. . Commissioner Forrest pointed out the request could be tabled asking the applicant to provide more information or have a vote. Planner Aaker responded if the Commission votes to deny the request the'applicant must wait one year to reapply; unless the proposal is significantly different. Commissioner Platteter agreed with past comments; however, he added he would be against any structure moved closer to`the creek. Commissioner Staunton stated he is sympathetic to the issue; however, he would like more information on water quality and landscaping along the creek, tabling the request would be best. Motion Commissioner Staunton moved to continue a 15.96 -foot setback variance from Minnehaha Creek to the next meeting of the Planning Commission January 23, 2013. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. Ayes; Forrest, Schroeder, Potts, Carpenter, Staunton. Nays; Platteter. Motion carried. Page 8 of 10 4 VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Zoning Ordinance Update — Residential Development Commissioner Platteter addressed the Commission and explained he along with Commissioners Forrest and Potts have been working on residential development policies and potential ordinance changes. Platteter delivered a power point presentation highlighting the following: • Develop a process to understand the current residential rebuild situation • Create public input forums for feedback into any zoning updates • Study if new lot subdivisions under 75 -feet are feasible; and • Resident concerns with current residential rebuild situation. Platteter noted that the Commission has been addressing Ordinance updating since 2007 with a number of issues already addressed. Included in the discussion topics were: • Building height restrictions. These were enacted with a maximum of 35 - 40 -feet to the ridgeline. • Measure building height from existing grade rather than proposed. Enacted. • Increase side yard setback requirements on lots 60 -75 feet wide. Enacted • Eliminate bay window setback exception. Enacted • A finished first floor elevation ordinance that would only allow a new house first floor elevation to be 1 -foot higher than the existing first floor elevation. Continuing, Platteter added that residential FAR (floor /area ratios) had also been discussed but no action was taken. Platteter also noted their "group" found that to date the majority of concerns expressed were; 1) construction impact and 2) new home sizes and setback. He reminded the Commission that the City is in the process of enacting a formal Construction Management Plan to be enforced with weekly monitoring and that the Commission needs to remember that in Edina all residential projects are governed by the R -1 zoning district. Platteter said that public input should help clarify where the Commission needs to go with this. He also added they have reached out to the public through various outlets and would continue to do so. Concluding, Platter asked the Commission'to again keep the following dates in mind: • January 26th public input forum /Senior Center 10 AM — Noon • January 31St — public input forum /Senior Center 7 -9 pm Page 9 of 10 Platteter said it is their goal to bring something back to the Commission at the February 13th meeting. Chair G.rabiel thanked the three Commissioners for their work on this project. Commissioner Staunton thanked Potts, Platteter, Forrest for their work on behalf of the Commission The Commission endorsed the ongoing work by the work group. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair. Grabiel:acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Schroeder shared' with the Commission photos of construction sites where trees had been impacted by the.piling of earth around them. Schroeder said what these pictures indicate is the very real possibility that these large trees won't make it because their roots are covered. Schroeder stressed the importance of the tree canopy as being part of "neighborhood character ". Chair Grabiel stated Platteter and Forrest share the prize for best attendance; 100 %. X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague invited Commissioners to attend a UIL workshop on "Navigating the New Normal" on February 12 at the Senior Center 6 -8 PM. Planner Teague also reported the, Sidell subdivision would be coming before them on the 23rd with a sketch plan. XI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 PM. Page 10 of 10 fr�'g" N-J MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION November 27, 2012 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston called the meeting to order at 7:07 PM. II. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Bigbee, Erhardt, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston, and Svident Members Mohtadi and Stang. Staff present: Scott Neal, City Manager and temporary Staff Liaison; and Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern, Kaylin Martin, Communications Coordinator. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Stanton to approve the meeting agenda of the November 27, 2012 meeting with the addition of domestic partners statute revision. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Seidman. Ayes: Bigbee, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. IV CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED IV. A. October 23, 2012 Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Stanton and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee to approve the October 23, 2012 minutes with the revisions submitted by Commissioner Kingston prior to the meeting. Ayes: Bigbee, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no community comments. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS V1. A. Karmit Bulman, Conflict Resolution Center Commissioner Newell introduced our speaker Karmit Bulman Executive Director of the Conflict Resolution Center. Bulman presented the following information: They recently changed their name from Minneapolis Mediation program to Conflict Resolution Center (CRC). The CRC aims to bring people together to have a facilitated dialogue and solve conflict. Impartial party brings people together to solve disputes in an agreeable manner. Mediation is neutral. Mediation needs to be voluntary, confidential and respectful. They offer mediation services for neighborhoods, businesses, relationship /family, landlord- tenant conflict. Working with the Edina Resource Center to do outreach, has served as many as 90 Edina Residents at any time. There is a fee, but if people cannot afford the fee it's waived. Training in mediation: under Minnesota Law to be a qualified neutral you go through 30 hours of training bylaw. A little over 30 hours, eludes an observation period. The CRC also works with schools, and is trying to work with the Edina Schools but right now they are not in the school. VI. B. Year in Review Presentation The Commissioners presented a PowerPoint highlighting their work throughout the year. Chair Kingston shared information about Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals. The Edina HRRC was one of seven organizations to help bring this to the University of Minnesota Campus. The exhibit took place from April 2 "d to May 11. Commissioner Seidman shared information about the City's Religious Observance Policy. Policy was approved in the Spring. The policy was to make every effort to not hold public meetings on significant days of Religious Observance. Right now, the City has eight holidays they recognize. Commissioner Bigbee shared as a result of the policy; the Hindu community reached out to the City and invited them to their Diwali celebration. Commissioner Bigbee and Student Commissioner Mohtadi shared information about the Conflict — Free Initiative and resolution. The Conflict free initiative was led by our Students. Conflict Free Initiative regarded the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The resolution recommended the City of Edina support companies that traced their supply chains and not include conflict minerals in their production. Chair Kingston shared there is a wonderful article about the Conflict free Resolution and our student member Tara Mohtadi in Edina Magazine. Commissioner gave an update on the Tom Oye award and encouraged applications. The award is given annual to individuals who live and work in Edina and who promote and advance human relations and rights. Applications are due by January 15. Commissioner Stanton gave an update of the marriage amendment. In February, the Commission recommended a resolution to the City Council opposing the Minnesota Constitutional amendment on Marriage. The City Council was the first suburban City to take a view on the issue. The amendment was voted down by the state on November 6, 2012. Edina voted down the margin by almost 2 to 1, 34 %. Every precinct in Edina voted against the amendment. Minnesota was the first state to defeat the amendment, 32 other states had passed it. Commissioner Stanton gave an update of the voter. id amendment. The amendment was voted down by the state, defeated by a bigger margin than the marriage amendment statewide. Commissioner Seidman shared information about Days of Remembrance. This was the second year we celebrated Days of Remembrance. To remember the 17 million people who were killed during the Holocaust. The proclamation that was signed this year automatically recognizes the Days of Remembrance annually. Commissioner Finsness and Student Commissioner Stang shared information about Edina Read's anti - bullying event. April 22, 2013 from 7- 8:30 p.m. at the Fireside room at the Edina Senior Center. The book is called, A Thinking Man's Bully by Michael Adelberg. Commissioner Winnick shared information about the City's Bias/Hate Crime Response Plan. The City has established a response plan to be administered by this Commission. This year to date there has not been a hate crime. We have established a network of community resources that can be activated if a response is needed. VI. C. Appoint Nominati ;,g Committee Commissioner Winnick explained the bylaws indicate the need for a nominating committee to elect two positions, Chair and Vice Chair. Both positions will serve one year. The Election will take place in February. Manager Neal informed the Commission that although ballots are allowed, they need to be signed in order to conform to open meeting laws. V1. D. General Work Plan Updates I. Initiate Census Research Funding Recommendation Commissioner Stanton stated there is no other news to report. II. Anti- bullying Event and Education Commissioner Finsness stated there is no other news to report. Commissioner Bigbee stated the HRRC is interested in input from residents about other forms of bullying. III. Marriage Amendment Commissioner Stanton stated we can remove this from the work plan. IV. Voter 1D Amendment Commissioner Stanton stated we can remove this from the work plan. V. Tom Oye Award Developed press release and a mailing piece has been sent out to over 50 letters to a variety of civic leaders. I would encourage the commissioners to continue to think of nominees or nominators. Applications must be received by January 15. Award will be presented in April. Information is available on the City's website. V1. E. Domestic Partner Statute Revisions Commissioner Stanton passed out a copy of a resolution the HRRC recommended a couple years ago and the City Council passed. The City of Minneapolis more than a decade ago had domestic partner benefits for employees. It was challenged in court and the City lost and struck down the ordinance. The.Minnesota Statute 471.61 defined dependents, which prohibited domestic partners. In 2008, the legislature tried to change the statue by adding a phrase stating and others as defined by governmental units at their discretion. The legislation had both bipartisan representation, one of the republicans was then Representative, Erhardt. It passed overwhelmingly in both the house and the senate but Governor Pawlenty vetoed it. Last session it was reintroduced, but it went nowhere. The view of the populous has changed, and this section is going to have to be changed anyway because the state law is in conflict of the federal affordable care act which allows persons under 26 to be on their parents insurance. Commissioner Stanton asked if they need to have the City Council reaffirm this. City Manager Neal recommended sending the resolution to the Council. Commissioner Stanton moved to re -pass the resolution and recommend it to the Council. It would no longer be Minnesota Statutes 2009, it would be 2012. Remove the word minor and dependent students under the age of 25. Resolution recommended to the Council should read: Be it Resolved: The Edina City Council urges the Minnesota Legislature and Governor to amend M. S. 471.61, Subdivision la as follows: Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 471.6 1, subdivision la is amended to read: Subd. la. Dependents. Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statues 1969, section 471.61, as amended by Laws 1971, chapter 451, section 1 the word "dependents" as used therein shall mean spouse and unmarried children under the age of 26 years, and others as defined by governmental units at their discretion. Commissioner Stanton moved that the City Council adopt the recommended resolution or a similar resolution. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Finsness. Ayes: Bigbee, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS There was no correspondence or petitions. VII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Finsness urged citizens to participate in the Edina Read's event by reading a Thinking Man's Bully and attending the event on April 22 "d at 7pm at the Senior Center. Chair Kingston reminded the group there is no December meeting and the January meeting will be on the 22 "d. VIII. STAFF COMMENTS Manager Neal shared this will be his last meeting with the HRRC, Staff Liaison Schaefer will be returning in January. IX. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Commissioner Stanton moved and Commissioner Winnick seconded adjournment of the meeting. Ayes: Bigbee, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Chair Kingston declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 PM. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC, November 27, 2012 Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern Jessi Kingston, HRRC Chair h MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 22, 2013 9:51 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the meeting to order at 9:51 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 19, 2012 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for June 19, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -01 AUTHORIZING POTENTIAL PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AT 3944 WEST 4-9,% STREET ADOPTED Economic Development Manager noted the City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has studied the parking availability at the 50th and France business district and found that additional public parking was needed to support the continued success of this district. He stated the study confirmed that the existing North Parking Ramp at 3936 -3940 West 49 -1/2 Street has the ability to be expanded to provide additional public parking for customers and employees. Construction of additional parking at the North Ramp would be preferred before any renovation of the South and Middle Ramps. The new parking would make up for the temporary loss of spaces during the renovation process. Mr. Neuendorf reported the single story building located west of the North Ramp at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street was available for lease or for sale. The property owners have expressed a willingness to consider a lease or sale to the City /HRA. Mr. Neuendorf requested the HRA authorize the negotiation of terms for a potential purchase of the property with the owners. Following a brief discussion and with a suggested modification to the proposed Resolution No. 2013 -01, Commissioner Swenson made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sprague adopting Resolution No. 2013= 01 Authorizing the potential purchase of the property at 3944 West 49 % Street as amended. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Edina _Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 1 Scott Neal, Executive Director A, e '.,. V\ i) To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #k From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: February 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013- 02, Authorizing Purchase Agreement for Property at 3930 West 49 -1/2 Street Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: The City / Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has studied the parking availability at the 50th and France business district and found that additional public parking is needed to support the continued success. The study confirmed that the existing North Parking Ramp at 3936 -3940 West 49 -1/2 Street has the ability to be expanded to provide additional public parking for customers and employees. Construction of additional parking at the North Ramp is preferred prior to the renovation of the South and Middle Ramps. This new parking will make up for the temporary loss of spaces during the renovation process. The two story office building at 3930 West 49 -1/2 Street is currently available for lease or for sale. The current tenants will be relocating in Spring 2013, leaving the property vacant. The City /HRA has negotiated terms of a purchase agreement with the owner. • The purchase price will be no more than $2,650,000. • The closing date shall be on or about June 3, 2013. • During the due diligence period, the City/HRA retains the rights to further investigate the property. • An independent third -party appraisal will be obtained to validate the value of the property. • A Phase I environmental study will also be conducted. In the event that environmental contamination is identified, the City/HRA is not obligated to purchase the site. • The current owner are responsibility for removing any asbestos, prior to closing. • All tenants must vacate the building prior to closing. • The City/HRA must complete due diligence by April 3, 2013. Existing TIF monies are anticipated to be used to fund the purchase. Presuming that the public parking ramp is expanded on the site, long -term debt may be issued to finance acquisition over a multi -year period. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -02 Purchase Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -02 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PROPERTY AT 3930 WEST 49 -1/2 STREET WHERAS, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) may acquire real property and may operate and maintain public parking facilities in connection with any of its projects pursuant to the authority provided under Minn. Stat. 469.012; and WHEREAS, the HRA has previously constructed a public parking facility located at 3936 -3940 West 49-1/2 Street; and WHEREAS, studies have confirmed the need for additional parking in the business district as well as the viability of the existing garage to be expanded to provide additional parking; and WHEREAS; terms of a Purchase Agreement have been reached with the owner of the property located at 3930 West 49 -1/2 Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424 and; WHEREAS, the HRA declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the acquisition from the proceeds of bonds pursuant to the Internal Revenue Service regulations, Section 1.150 -2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority approves the Purchase Agreement for the property located at 3930 West 49-1/2 Street and authorizes the Chair and Executive Director to execute the documents necessary to purchase the property. Attest: Dated: February 5, 2013. Ann Swenson, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR James B. Hovland, Chair I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of February 5, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Executive Director REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ( "Agreement "), dated as of the day of February, 2013 (the "Contract Date "), by and between 3930 BUILDING, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Seller ") and the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota ("Purchaser"). 1. PROPERTY. In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and agreements hereinafter contained, Seller agrees to sell and convey to Purchaser, and Purchaser agrees to buy the real property, legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto from Seller, upon the :terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, together with all and singular rights and appurtenances .pertaining to the real property including, but not limited to all right, title and interest of Seller in and to adjacent streets, rights of way, easements, utility agreements, parking and other shared use agreements and all hereditaments and appurtenances pertaining thereto, if any (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"). 2. PURCHASE PRICE AND MANNER OF PAYMENT. The total purchase price ( "Purchase Price ") for the Property shall be payable by Purchaser to Seller by wire transfer at Closing (as hereinafter defined) in the amount of Two Million Six Hundred Fifty Thousand and No /100 ($2,650,000.00) Dollars. 3. TITLE TO BE DELIVERED. Seller shall deliver to Purchaser, or cause to be delivered to Purchaser, at Closing, an executed Limited Warranty Deed ( "Deed ") in recordable form conveying fee simple title to the Property subject to the terms of this Agreement and: (a) Reservations of minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota; (b) Building, zoning and subdivision laws and regulations consistent with the current use of the Property; (c) The lien of real estate taxes and installments of special assessments which are payable by Purchaser pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; (d) Applicable laws, regulations, zoning regulations and ordinances, whether federal, state or local; (e) Exceptions to title which constitute encumbrances, restrictions, or easements which have been disclosed to Purchaser and accepted by Purchaser in writing; and (f) The additional exceptions to title listed on the attached Exhibit "B ". (hereinafter "Permitted Encumbrances "). 4. RELOCATION BENEFITS. Seller is aware of Seller's rights and payments that Seller may be eligible to receive pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (the "Act "). Seller acknowledges that Seller has been given the opportunity to seek and receive the advice of legal counsel with respect to relocation, moving, reestablishment and other costs, if any, that may be available under the Act. Seller hereby acknowledges that the payment of the Purchase Price does not include a payment for Relocation Benefits. At Closing and as a condition precedent to Closing, Seller will waive any right to receive any relocation payments pursuant to the Act (or other federal or state law provisions) with respect to the Property. Seller acknowledges that Seller will make such a waiver of Seller's own volition and with full knowledge of the specific relocation benefits to which Seller may be entitled. Seller and Purchaser agree that this is a voluntary sale by Seller. Purchaser represents that Purchaser would not acquire the Property in the event that negotiations between ,Seller and Purchaser had failed to result in an. amicable agreement. Prior to any action. by Purchaser indicating intent to acquire the Proerty, Seller placed the Property . on the market '.;for sale. Thereafter, upon inquiry by the Purchaser,. Seller requested :that Purchaser acquire the Property through negotiation. Seller clearly showed intent to sell the Property on the open . market prior to any discussions, inquiries or negotiations by Purchaser. If the transaction set forth by this Agreement is not completed,. Purchaser has no present intent to acquire the property by eminent domain and has not considered the use of eminent domain. If this Agreement is terminated for any reason, Seller is free to retain ownership of the Property or to sell the Property on the private market. As Purchaser and Seller agree that this is a voluntary sale, state and federal law permit the Purchaser to request a waiver of relocation benefits from Seller, as provided under Minnesota Statute Section 117.521. Prior to and as a condition of Closing, Seller will be required to sign a relocation waiver, the form of which is substantially the same as shown on Exhibit "C" and the final form will be subject to the approval of Purchaser ( "Relocation Waiver "). Purchaser will arrange for a relocation consultant to meet with Seller prior to Closing. The relocation consultant will determine the amount of any relocation benefits for which Seller would be eligible if this were a non - voluntary sale. If Seller does not waive relocation benefits, this Agreement will be terminated and Seller will be free to retain ownership of the Property or sell on the private market. 5. LEASE. (a) Seller has disclosed and Purchaser acknowledges that the Property is currently occupied pursuant to that certain lease dated November 26, 2002 by and between Seller and Edina Realty, Inc. (the "Existing Tenant "), as the same has been amended (collectively, the "Lease "); (b) Seller represents that the Lease will expire on May 31, 2013, extinguishing the Existing Tenant's and its sub - tenants' rights of possession. (c) As used herein, the "Lease Condition" shall be satisfied upon the occurrence of the following events: (i) vacation of the Property by the Existing Tenants and any subtenants; and (ii) delivery of the Estoppel, as defined below. In no event shall 16822701 Purchaser agree to accept title to the Property subject to the Lease or any rights of sub - tenants. (d) As used herein, the "Estoppel" or "Estoppel Certificate" shall mean a written statement signed by the Existing Tenant that in pertinent part confirms that the Lease will expire and the Existing Tenant's and sub - tenant's rights thereunder, including, but not limited to, rights of possession, will terminate no later than May 31, 2013. (e) In the event that Seller is unable to satisfy the Lease Condition by the date set for the Closing Date, then either party shall have the right to extend the date for satisfying the Lease Condition and the date for Closing for up to thirty (30) days in order for Seller to attempt to satisfy the Lease Condition. In the event Seller is unable to timely satisfy the Lease Condition by the Closing Date, as the same may have been so extended, Purchaser shall have the option to either proceed to close as otherwise provided herein or terminate this Agreement. 6. EVIDENCE OF TITLE. (a) Within twenty (20) days following the date of execution of this Purchase Agreement, Purchaser shall obtain a commitment for an ALTA Owner's Form title insurance policy (the "Commitment ") issued by Land Title, Inc. (the "Title Company "), pursuant to which the Title Company agrees to issue to the Purchaser upon the recording of the documents of conveyance referred to herein an Owner's title insurance policy insuring the Property in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. The Commitment shall include proper searches covering bankruptcies, state and federal judgments and liens and levied and pending special assessments, which Commitment: (1) Insures that Purchaser has marketable title of record to the Property, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, leases, claims and charges, all material easements, rights -of -way, covenants, conditions and restrictions and any other matters affecting title, except for Permitted Encumbrances. (2) Waives or agrees to insure over the following standard exceptions: (A) Facts which would be disclosed by a comprehensive survey of the Property, if Purchaser obtains, prior to the Closing Date, at Purchaser's sole expense, a survey satisfactory to the Title Company for purpose of waiving the standard exception for survey matters; (B) Rights and claims of parties in possession; and (C) Mechanic's, contractor's and material liens and lien claims. 168227v11 3 (b) Purchaser shall have fifteen (15) days after receipt of the Commitment to deliver to Seller written objections to title based on marketability of the Property ( "Objections ") and Seller shall have sixty (60) days to have such Objections removed or satisfied, during which period the Closing Date shall be postponed, if necessary. If Seller fails or is unable to have such Objections removed within said time, Purchaser may, at its sole election, do any of the following: (1) Termination. Terminate this Agreement without any liability on its part in exchange for a quit claim deed for the Property. (2) Escrow for Cure. If the parties agree to an escrow, Seller shall escrow an amount sufficient to assure cure of the Objection(s). Any amount so escrowed will be placed in an escrow with title pending such cure. If such escrow is 'established, the parties agree to execute and deliver such documents as may be reasonably required by the Title Company, and Seller agrees to pay the charges of the Title Company to create and administer the escrow. (3) Purchaser Cure. To the extent an Objection can be satisfied by the payment of money, Purchaser shall have the right to pay, the amount necessary to satisfy such Objection and the amount so applied shall be reimbursed to Purchaser by Seller at the Closing, provided, that the amount due to the third -party claimant is an undisputed liquidated amount for which Seller's liability is undisputed. Notwithstanding the limitation, waiver, and relinquishment of remedies in Section 18, if Purchaser funds such a cure of monetary objection, and is not reimbursed at Closing by Seller, Purchaser shall have a right of action to recover from Seller an amount equal to the dollar amount of Seller's undisputed and liquidated liability. (4) Waiver. Waive such objections and take title to the Property subject to such objections. 7. REPRESENTATIONS OF SELLER. On information and belief, without special investigation, Seller hereby represents to Purchaser: (a) That Seller has the requisite power and authority to enter into this Purchase Agreement and the closing documents relating thereto to be signed by it; that the execution, delivery and performance by Seller of such documents do not conflict with or result in violation of any judgment, order or decree of any court to which Seller is a party; such documents are valid and binding obligations of Seller. (b) There are no existing claims, actions, suits or other proceedings pending, or to the knowledge of Seller, threatened by any governmental department or agency, or any other corporation, partnership or entity or person whomsoever against Seller or the Property, which in any manner or to any extent may detrimentally affect the 16822701 4 Property or Purchaser's right, title or interest in and to any part or all of the Property after Closing. (c) Other than Seller and the Existing Tenant there are no other tenants or occupants of the Property. (d) On the Date of Closing there will be no (i) outstanding leases or occupancy agreements, or (ii) outstanding contracts made by Seller for any improvements to the Property which have not been fully paid for or for which Seller shall not have made arrangements to pay off, at Closing, or that will affect the Property or binding upon Purchaser or upon the Property subsequent to Closing without Purchaser's written consent; and Seller shall cause to be discharged all mechanic's or materialmen's liens arising from any labor or materials furnished to the Property that were made at the request of Seller, its agents, or contractors, prior to the Date of Closing and any mortgages or other such similar encumbrances. (e) Until the Date of Closing, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Seller shall maintain the land associated with the Property in its present condition, reasonable wear and tear and damage by casualty excepted. (f) Seller is not a foreign person; as such term is defined in Section 1445(f) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and shall deliver an affidavit to that effect at closing, which shall be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Purchaser. (g) To Seller's knowledge, except as disclosed in the documentation provided to Purchaser pursuant to Section 8, (i) no toxic materials, hazardous wastes or hazardous substances, as such terms are defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1996, as amended (42 U.S.C. §6901, et seMc .) or in the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (42 U.S.C. §9601, et seq.), including, without limitation, any asbestos or asbestos- related.products or materials and any oils, petroleum- derived compounds or pesticides ( "Hazardous Materials ") have been generated, treated, stored, released or disposed of or otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Property; and (ii) the Property is free of Hazardous Materials and. is not subject to any "superfund" type liens or claims by governmental regulatory agencies or third parties arising from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances in, on, or about the Property. (h) To Seller's knowledge, the conveyance of the Property pursuant hereto will not violate any currently existing applicable statute, ordinance, governmental restriction or regulation, or any private restriction or `agreement to which Seller is a party. 168227v11 5 (i) To Seller's knowledge, there are no underground storage tanks or wells on the Property, it being understood that the representation as to wells shall be recited in the Deed to be delivered by Seller at Closing. (j) To the best of Seller's knowledge, Seller represents that methamphetamine production has not occurred on the Property. (k) Solely for purposes of satisfying the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 115.55,- Seller certifies that, to Seller's knowledge, there is no "individual sewage treatment system" (within the meaning of that statute) on or serving the Property. Seller certifies that sewage generated on the Property goes to a facility permitted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Except as herein expressly stated, including, without limitation, the requirements of Section 10(d) below, Purchaser is purchasing the Property based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any representation of Seller or other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Property "as is, where is subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties herein contained. The representations set forth in this section shall be continuing and shall be true and correct as of the Date of Closing with the same force and effect as if made at that time and shall survive the Closing for a period of two (2) years. 8. REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AND ACCESS TO PROPERTY. Within twenty (20) days of the execution of this Agreement, Seller agrees to provide Purchaser with all of the following documentation: (a) True and correct copies of all existing environmental assessment reports, soil reports and results of allr soil tests and environmental assessments in Seller's possession; (b) Surveys, permits, licenses, leases, complete copies of all contracts currently affecting the Property readily available or in the possession of Seller ( "Other Agreements "), and notices received within the last 90 days from the city, state or other governmental authorities pertaining to uncured violations of any law, ordinance or regulation. Seller's obligation to provide the foregoing documentation shall continue for any such documentation, that Seller receives following execution of this Agreement and prior to Closing. Seller acknowledges that Purchaser and Purchaser's agents shall have access to the Property without charge and at reasonable times for the purpose of Purchaser's survey, environmental investigation and testing of the Property ( "Environmental Investigation "); provided, however, Purchaser shall perform its Environmental Investigation in such a manner as to not unreasonably disturb the Existing Tenant. If the Existing Tenant vacates the Property prior to the expiration of the Lease and permits Seller and Purchaser to do so, Seller shall permit Purchaser to return to the Property to perform additional Environmental Investigation, if recommended by Purchaser's Phase I environmental assessment. Purchaser shall pay all costs and expenses of Environmental 168227v11 Investigation and Purchaser shall hold harmless and indemnify the Property and Seller, its employees, agents and affiliates, from and against any and all claims, suits, losses, liabilities, and expenses (including attorney's fees, expert's fees, and other expenses of litigation) on account of injury to or death of any persons (including Purchaser's or the Existing Tenant's employees, contractors and agents) or damage to property or contamination of or adverse effects on the environment or liens against Seller or the Property, caused by Purchaser's entry onto the Property. Purchaser's obligations under this Section 8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement or the Closing. Purchaser shall repair and restore any damage to the Property caused, by or occurring during Purchaser's Environmental. Investigation and return the Property to substantially the same condition as existed prior to any Environmental Investigation. Purchaser shall have the right in 'its sole discretion to contact various public officials and administrators to verify information regarding the status of the Property and to determine that the Property is suitable for Purchaser's intended use. 9. SELLER'S CONTINGENCIES. The obligations of Seller under this Agreement are expressly contingent upon the following: (a) Vacation of the Property by the Existing Tenants and any subtenants on or before the Closing Date. The contingencies set forth in this section are for the sole and exclusive benefit of Seller, and Seller shall have the right to waive the contingencies by giving notice to Purchaser. 10. PURCHASER'S CONTINGENCIES. The obligations of Purchaser under this Agreement are expressly contingent upon the following: (a) The representations of Seller contained in this Agreement must be true now and as of the Closing Date, as if made on the Closing Date and Seller shall have delivered to Purchaser on the Closing Date, a certificate, signed by Seller, certifying that such representations are true as of the Closing Date (the "Bring - down Certificate "), except to the extent that the representations are no longer true and acceptable to Purchaser. (b) Title to the Property and easements to be acquired under this Agreement shall be held by Seller on the Closing Date, and shall be free and clear of all encumbrances except the Permitted Encumbrances. (c) On or before April 3, 2013, Purchaser shall be satisfied, in its reasonable discretion, with the results of any Environmental Investigation and remediation of Hazardous Materials conducted by Purchaser or Seller on the Property. (d) Within the time period provided under Section 8, Seller shall have caused Braun Intertec to perform a pre- demolition survey of Hazardous- Materials in the existing building onAhe Property and provided the survey to Purchaser; 16822701 7 (e) Seller having caused the removal and proper disposal of any Hazardous Materials identified by Braun Intertec in the pre- demolition survey required under subsection (d) of this Section that is capable of being removed without demolition of such building, at Seller's sole cost and expense, on or before the Closing Date, in accordance with applicable laws. (f) Existing Tenant providing the Estoppel Certificate pursuant to; Section 5 confirming that the Lease will expire prior to the Closing Date. (g) Seller, as owner of the Property, agrees to sign . a voluntary waiver of all relocation assistance, services, payments and benefits as set forth in Minnesota Statute Section 117.521, as required under Section 4. (h) Seller shall perform all of the obligations required to be performed under this Agreement, as and when required by this Agreement, except as waived by Purchaser. (i) On or before April 3, 2013, Purchaser having determined that it is satisfied with its review and analysis of all documents required to be .provided by Seller under Section 8. (j) On or before February 15, 2013, Purchaser shall have received a so-called, "Restricted Report" appraisal of the current value of Property at or above the Purchase Price by Shenehon Company pursuant to the letter proposal from Shenehon Company to Bill Neuendorf of the City of Edina, dated December 27, 2012, a copy of which is attached Exhibit "D." The standard of value used by the appraiser shall mean the price a willing buyer and a willing seller would agree upon as a fair price for the Property in its present location and physical condition, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell. Seller and Purchaser shall allocate the cost of the appraisal pursuant to Sections 14(a)(8) and 14(b)(6) below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Shenehon Company provides a range of values instead of a single value, this contingency shall be deemed satisfied if the Purchase Price is within the range. If the contingencies set forth in subsections (c), (i) and 0) above have not been satisfied or waived by Purchaser on or before the respective dates set forth therein or any of the other contingencies set forth above have not been satisfied or waived by Purchaser by the Closing Date, as otherwise extended, Purchaser may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller within 3 business days after the expiration of the time period for Purchaser to satisfy or waive any such contingency, in which event this Agreement shall terminate and neither party shall have any further obligations hereunder, except for Purchaser's indemnity obligations pursuant to Section 8. The contingencies set forth in this section are for the sole and exclusive benefit of Purchaser, and Purchaser shall have the right to waive the contingencies by giving notice to Seller, provided Purchaser abides by the time requirements set forth above. 16822701 8 11. CLOSING. The closing hereof shall take place on June 3, 2013, except as otherwise extended or terminated as provided under this Agreement (the "Closing" or "Date of Closing "). The Closing shall take place at the offices of the Title Company. If Closing does not occur on or before June 30, 2013, this Agreement shall be null and void, Purchaser shall execute a quit claim deed for the Property in favor of Seller, and neither party shall have any further obligations hereunder, except for Purchaser's indemnity obligations pursuant to Section 8. At Closing, Seller and Purchaser shall disclose their Social Security Numbers or Federal Tax Identification Numbers for the purpose of completing state and federal taxTorms. 12. SELLER'S OBLIGATIONS AT CLOSING. On or prior to the Date of Closing, Seller shall: (a) Execute, acknowledge and deliver to Purchaser the Deed to the Property conveying to Purchaser marketable fee simple title to the Property subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances. (b) Execute and/or deliver to Purchaser such other documents as may be required by this Agreement or as may be reasonably required by Title Company, including well disclosures and sewage treatment system disclosures. (c) Deliver to Purchaser a.standard form affidavit by the Seller indicating that on the Date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens or bankruptcies against or involving Seller or the Property; that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made or for which mechanic's liens could be filed; and that there are no other unrecorded interests in the Property. (d) Deliver to Purchaser a "bring- down" certificate, certifying that all of the representations made by Seller in this Agreement remain true as of the Date of Closing, subject to exceptions or events occurring subsequent to this Purchase Agreement that are acceptable to Purchaser. (e) Deliver to Purchaser the Estoppel Certificate. (f) Execute and deliver to Purchaser a waiver of relocation benefits as required under Section 4. (g) Deliver to Purchaser a written indemnity that shall indemnify, defend and hold Purchaser free and harmless of and against any and all claims, obligations, and liability (and attorney fees and court costs in connection therewith) associated with: any claim asserted by the Existing Tenant for relocation benefits pursuant to the Federal or Minnesota Uniform Relocation Act. 13. PURCHASER'S OBLIGATIONS AT CLOSING. At Closing and subject to the terms, conditions, and provisions hereof and the performance by Seller of its obligations as set forth above, Purchaser shall: 16822701 9 (a) Deliver to Seller by wire transfer the balance of the Purchase Price, less any adjustments. (b) Execute and/or deliver to Seller such other documents as may be required by this Agreement or as may be reasonably required by Title Company. 14. CLOSING COSTS. The following costs and expenses shall be paid as follows in connection with the Closing: (a) Seller shall pay: (1) Seller's attorneys' fees; (2) The cost of preparing the Commitment; (3) The cost of recording the satisfaction of any existing mortgage and any , other reasonable document(s) necessary to make title marketable; (4) The cost of preparation of the Deed and other documents of conveyance prepared by Seller and the cost for state deed tax; (5) The cost of engineers or other consultants, if any, engaged by Seller for the pre - demolition survey and removal of Hazardous Materials from the building on the Property, to the extent required by Section 10(d); (6) Operating expenses relating to the Property incurred for the period prior to the Closing'Date; and (7) One -half of the closing fee charged by Title Company for the Closing between Seller and Purchaser. (8) One -half the cost of the Shenehon Company opinion of value referred to in Section 10(i) above, up to a maximum amount of $3,000.00. (b) Purchaser shall pay the following costs in connection with the Closing: (1) The cost of the premium and endorsements issued pursuant to the Commitment. (2) Filing fee required to record the Deed and costs and filing fees for documents to be recorded that are not required to be paid by Seller. (3) Purchaser's attorneys' fees. 168227vll 10 (4) One -half of the closing fee charged by Title Company for the Closing between Seller and Purchaser. (5) The cost of engineers or other consultants, if any, engaged by Purchaser regarding the Property. (6) The balance of the cost of the Shenehon Company opinion of value referred to in Section 10(i) above. 15. UTILITIES. TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. (a) Seller shall pay all utilities, general real estate taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable in the year prior to the Date of Closing and in years prior thereto. Utilities, real estate taxes and - installments of special assessments due and payable in and for the year of closing shall be prorated between Seller and Purchaser on a calendar year basis to the actual Date of Closing; (b) Purchaser shall pay utilities, real estate taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable after the actual Date of Closing. 16. CONTROL OF PROPERTY. Prior to the Date of Closing, Seller shall have the full responsibility and the entire liability for any and all damages or injuries of any kind whatsoever to the Property, to any and all persons, whether employees or otherwise, except liability arising from the activities of Purchaser, its agents, contractors or employees. Any removable fixtures, equipment or personal property left at the Property after the Date of Closing, shall be considered abandoned by Seller and Purchaser shall be free to dispose of these items in any manner it chooses at its sole discretion. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement, Seller shall indemnify, defend and hold Purchaser free and harmless from and against any and all claims, obligations -and liability (and attorneys' fees and court costs in connection therewith) arising out of the Property or any portion thereof from any event, occurrence, act, or failure to act prior to Closing and Purchaser shall indemnify, defend and hold Seller free and harmless from and against any and all claims, obligations and liability (and attorneys' fees and court costs in connection therewith) arising out of the Property or any portion thereof from any event, occurrence,, act, or failure to act after Closing. 17. POSSESSION. Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to Purchaser on the Date of Closing. 18. DEFAULT; REMEDIES. If Seller has performed or is ready, willing and able to perform all obligations required by this Agreement and Purchaser shall fail or refuse to perform this Agreement within the time and in the manner provided, then Seller's sole remedy shall be termination of this Agreement, in which case the parties shall have no further rights and obligations hereunder other than those rights and/or obligations which are expressly stated to survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. If Purchaser has performed or is ready, willing and able to perform all obligations required by 1.his Agreement and Seller shall fail or refuse to perform this Agreement within the 16822701 11 time and in the manner provided, then Purchaser, at its option may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice thereof to Seller, in which case the parties shall have no further rights and obligations hereunder other than those rights and/or obligations which are expressly stated to survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 19. MISCELLANEOUS. The following general provisions govern this Agreement: (a) _ Time is of the Essence. The Date of Closing, as the same may be extended pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, is of the absolute essence. (b) Governing Law. This Agreement is made and executed under and in all respects is to be governed and construed under the laws of the State of Minnesota. .(c) Notices. Any notice required to be given to Seller or Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement is given in accordance with this Agreement if it is in writing and if it is directed to Seller by delivering it personally to an officer of Seller, or if it is directed to Purchaser, by delivering it personally to the Executive Director of Purchaser, or if mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized reputable overnight courier, property addressed as follows: Seller: 3930 Building, LLC 81 S. 9' Street, Suite 310 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attention: James W. Nelson With a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 S. 6' Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attention: Mark E. Hamel Purchaser: Edina HRA Attn: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 With a copy to: Andrea McDowell Poehler Campbell Knutson, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of deposit as aforesaid, provided, however, that if notice is given by deposit, the time for response to any notice by the other party shall commence to run one business day after any such deposit. Any party may change its address for the 16822701 12 service of notice by giving written notice of such change to the other party, in any manner above specified, 10 days prior to the effective date of such change. (d) Purchaser's Waiver Rights. Purchaser may, at its option, waive any right conferred upon the Purchaser by this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided herein, such waiver may be made only by giving Seller written notice specifically describing the right waived. (e) Survival. Except as otherwise stated herein, all of the terms of this Agreement will survive and be enforceable for a period of two (2) years after the Closing. (f) Amendment. This Agreement shall be amended only by a written instrument signed by Seller and Purchaser. . (g) Brokerage. Each party hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless of any claim made by a broker or sales agent or similar party for a commission due or alleged to be due on this transaction on the basis of an agreement with said broker made by the indemnifying party. The parties' obligations set forth in this section shall survive termination or consummation of this Agreement. (h) Assi nment. Neither Seller nor Purchaser shall assign this Agreement or its rights hereunder without the express written consent of the other, which may be withheld by the other in its sole discretion. (i) Benefit. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Seller and Purchaser and their respective successors and assigns (j) Construction. The captions and headings of the various sections of this Agreement are for convenience only and are not to be construed as defining or as limiting in any way the scope or intent of the .provisions hereof. Wherever the context requires or permits, the singular shall include the plural, the plural shall include singular, and the masculine, feminine and neuter shall be freely interchangeable. (k) Counterparts. For the convenience of the parties, any number of counterparts hereof may be executed and each such executed counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one in the same Agreement. (1) IRC 1033. Purchaser agrees to cooperate with Seller in Seller's quest for tax deferral pursuant to Section 1033 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Seller acknowledges that any exchange shall be at no cost to Purchaser and shall not release or diminish Seller's obligations and liability under this Agreement. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 16822701 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above, in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall evidence but one agreement. SELLER: 3930 BUILDING, LLC James W. Nelson Its Sole Member S -1 PURCHASER: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 0 James B. Hovland, Its Chair And: Scott Neal, Its Executive Director S -2 EXHIBIT A Leeal Description of Property That part of the North 112 of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision Number 172, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of the South 177.5 feet of Lot 32. EXCEPT: The West 14.75 feet thereof. ALSO: The South 177.5 feet of Lot 32, Auditor's Subdivision Number 172. Together with an easement for driveway purposes, filed of record as Document No. 2542948. A -1 EXHIBIT B Additional Permitted Encumbrances None Im EXHIBIT C Agreement Regardine Release, Payment and Assip-nment of Relocation Benefits THIS AGREEMENT REGARDING WAIVER AND ASSIGNMENT OF RELOCATION BENEFITS (this "Agreement ") is made as of , 2013, by and between 3930 BUILDING, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Seller ") and the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under. the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "Purchaser "). RECITALS: Seller and Purchaser entered into a purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement ") dated. as of February , 2013, related to property located at , Edina, Minnesota. Seller has been advised of its rights and payments that Seller may be eligible to receive pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (the "Act "), including payments for Minimum Compensation under Minn. Stat. 117.87. Seller acknowledges it has sought and received the advice of legal counsel and has been specifically advised as to relocation, moving, reestablishment, and other costs that may be available to the Seller under the Act. Seller and Purchaser desire to enter into this Agreement to confirm their understanding of the Seller's release, sale and assignment of any claim for any relocation benefits and/or other relocation costs due or payable to Seller, whether pursuant to the Act or otherwise. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective as of the date hereof, Seller hereby acknowledges that the payment of the Purchase Price includes payment for Relocation Benefits and Minimum Compensation Benefits and hereby releases Purchaser from any liability for payment of additional relocation payments pursuant to the Act (or other federal or state law provisions) with respect to the Property. 2. Effective as of the date hereof, Seller hereby sells, transfers and assigns to Purchaser any benefits, payments, claims, or other rights due or payable to Seller pursuant to the Act (or other federal or state law provisions) with respect to the Property. 3. Seller acknowledges that it has freely waived such rights of its own volition. 4. Seller acknowledges that it has waived such rights with full knowledge of the specific relocation benefits to which it would otherwise be entitled. C -1 5. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 6. This Agreement shall be null and void if the Purchase Agreement shall terminate or if Closing under the Purchase Agreement shall fail to occur for any reason. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Waiver of Relocation Benefits Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above written. SELLER: 3930 BUILDING, LLC In James W. Nelson Its Sole Member PURCHASER: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA And: James B. Hovland, Its Chair Scott Neal, Its Executive Director 168227v2 C -2 EXHIBIT D (See Attached) D -1 hAAPA SHENEHON COMPANY BUSINESS & [LEAL ESTATE VALUATIONS December 27, 2012 Mr. Bill Neuendorf City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Minneapolis, MN 55424 RE: Proposal for a Market Vale Appraisal of the Edina Realty Properly at Located at 3930 49'/2 Street, Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Neuendorf: We are pleased to submit a proposal to appraise the Edina Realty Building located at 3930 West 49 %2 Street for the intended use in a potential purchase. The valuation date of the appraisal will be current. Please keep in mind that an appraisal of the same property with a different valuation date constitutes a new assignment. We understand that you are our client in this matter and responsible for ensuring our fees are paid in a timely manner. SCOPE OF THE ASSIGNMENT We will identify the problem to be solved and determine (lie appropriate scope of work to produce credible assignment results. Scope of work is the type and extent of research and analysis in the assignment. Determining the scope of work is an ongoing process in an assignment. After discussion with you and applying our experience at 501i & France, it has become clear that the scope of this assignment should include a thorough highest and best use considering all reasonable market alternatives. Information or conditions discovered during the course of an assignment might cause the appraiser to reconsider the scope of work. Tlie appraisal will comply with the requirements and guidelines of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). RESTRCTED REPORT Shenehon Company will prepare a restricted appraisal report using all relevant approaches to value to estimate the market value of the subject property. A restricted report is one of the three narrative report options; the difference among the reports is the level of detail of presentation. Our report will summarize all information significant to the solution of the appraisal problem, with supporting data retained hi our workfile. You may review the workfrle at any time. 88 SOU111 TNT" srun' I Soul 400 1 MINWLAVOLIS 1 MINNESOTA 1 55.103 1 617/31.1-6333 1 FAX: 612/144.1635 %v%vw.SHENEHON.COAi 1 r-MAILT VAMLOWN1110N.COM I.R \111R 111 1111 ..1malrul 11M:11\ Arr".1141 1:1MONK. 168227v2 D -2 Mr. Bill Neuendorf Page 2 December 27, 2012 APPRAISAL FEE STRUCTURE Our fees for this engagement are not contingent upon any predetennined appraised value or the results of our services. Rather, our fees will be based on our hourly rates. Our estimated fees for these services are below. Note these are estimated fees, and our actual fees may differ. In the event we encounter unusual circumstances that would require us to expand the scope of the engagement or if we anticipate our fees will significantly exceed the estimated amount, we will advise you accordingly. We will provide two copies of the appraisal report; however, extra copies are available at our cost. In addition, you agree to reimburse us for any of our out -of- pocket costs incurred in connection with the performance of our services, including, but not limited to, travel expenses, color copies, and long- distance telephone calls. Restricted Report Not to Exceed $6,000 The fee is due and payable upon completion of the assignment. We reserve the right to require payment before the appraisal is released. Invoices unpaid 30 days past the billing date may be deemed delinquent and any balance owed may be subject to interest charges at the annual rate allowed by law. A retainer is not necessary. We anticipate that our appraisal will be completed shortly after the beginning of 2013 assuming written authorization and requested information and documents have been received. DESCRIPTION OF FIRM Shenehon Company is a real estate and business valuation firm serving both the public and private sectors throughout the United States, although our geographic concentration is the Upper Midwest. We have worked in over 40 states and are qualified to work in any state. Ha property is in a state where we are not permanently licensed, we can secure a temporary license to appraise in that state. Shenehon Company is dedicated to providing its clients with quality valuations prepared by knowledgeable appraisers and analysts. Staff members incorporate extensive and ongoing education with practical experience performing a wide variety of real estate and business valuations. TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS Many of our appraisers hold professional designations that are highly regarded in the appraisal industry. Our appraisers are also active members of various boards and trade associations. Our senior appraisers serve as review appraisers, arbitrators, mediators, commissioners, special magistrates, and lecturers. Over the years, our appraisers have published articles in local and national trade journals. 168227v2 D -3 Mr. Bill Neuendorf Page 3 December 27, 2012 SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS We have previously valued numerous properties at 50'1' and France, giving us the knowledge and experience to meet the competency provision outlined in USPAP. Shenehon appraisers have testified for many purposes, such as condemnation actions, property tax appeals, special assessment appeals, marriage dissolution proceedings, and the like. We have represented clients in state and federal courts, as well as arbitration panels and public service commissions. Appraisal reports prepared for litigation comprise a significant portion of our practice. Our methods arc recognized and respected, and our analyses are relied upon by the courts. We have enclosed a copy of our company brochure and most recent newsletter, along with resumes of our principals. For more information on Shenehon Company, please visit our websile at www.shenehon.com. If this proposal and attached appraisal contract conditions are acceptable, please indicate your approval below and return it to the undersigned. Thank you for considering Shenehon for your appraisal needs. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, SHENEHON COMPANY CITY OF EDINA AUTHORRIIZA'I'I N TO 4%yeQ Signatufe: 7 Robert J. Strachota, MAI, CREW, MCBA, FIBA Name: 4.L n!r President, Shareholder Minnesota License No. 4000882 Date: TA+�� Certified General Appraiser rjs/kaj Enclosure 168227v2 D -4 APPRAISAL CONTRACT CONDITIONS Shenehon Company warrants that the services will be performed in a professional manner, in accordance with established appraisal industry standards. The firm makes no further warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. 2. Disclosure of the contents of this appraisal report is governed by the bylaws and regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which various appraisers in the firm are affiliated. These include the Appraisal Institute, the Institute of Business Appraisers, the American Society of Appraisers, and The Counselors of Real Estate®. 3. Shenehon Company will preserve the confidential nature of information received from the client, in accordance with established appraisal industry standards. The client agrees to preserve the confidential format and content of the appraisal report. The report and the appraiser's identity may not be used in whole or part, outside the client's organization, without prior written approval, except for review by auditors and legal counsel, and by the representatives of taxing authorities. 4. The persons authorizing the engagement on behalf of the client and Shenehon Company are empowered to do so. 5. The client agrees that Shenehon Company does not, by entering into this contract or by performing the services rendered, assume, abridge, abrogate, or undertake to discharge any duty of (lie client to any other entity. 6. Any use of the appraisal report, by the client, is conditioned upon payment of all fees in accordance with the agreed terms. 7. The fee charged for the appraisal is not contingent upon values concluded by Shenehon Company or any future event such as the securing of financing. 8. The proposed delivery schedule indicated in the engagement letter (unless otherwise stated) assumes that: a. Written authorization and/or the retainer are received by a specified date or in a timely manner. b. All information requested by Shenehon Company is readily available or provided by the client in a timely mariner. C. The appraisers employed by Shenehon Company will have ready access to the property to be appraised. 9. All fees set forth in the engagement letter are due and payable upon completion of the specified assignment regardless of whether the valuation conclusions reached coincide with the client's expectations. 168227v2 D -5 10. No opinion is intended to be expressed for matters that require legal or other specialized expertise, investigation, or knowledge beyond that customarily employed by appraisers in the evaluation of real estate or businesses. 11. Unless specific conditions are brought to the appraiser's attention, the appraiser will assume that there are no hidden or unexpected conditions of the asset to be appraised that would adversely affect or enhance the value. 12. Hazardous substances, if present within a property or business operation, may result in an actual or potential liability that will adversely affect the marketability and value of the asset. Such liability may be in the form of immediate recognition of existing hazardous conditions or fiuture liability that could stem from the release of currently known hazardous contaminants. In the development of the opinion of value, no consideration will be given to such liability, or its impact on value, unless Shenehon Company is specifically retained to perform or prepare an environmental or toxic contamination analysis. Nonetheless, in the event that such a report is prepared, the client releases the appraiser from any and all fixture environmental liability. 13. If Shenehon Company is compelled to produce documents or testify regarding work performed, the client will reimburse the appraiser for all costs and expenses incurred. 14. In consideration for performing the services rendered at the fee charged, Shenehon Company expressly limits its liability to five (5) times the fee amount paid or $100,000, whichever is less. 15. Shenehon Company expressly disclaims liability as ats insurer or guarantor. Any persons seeking greater protection from loss or damage than is provided for herein should obtain appropriate insurance. 16. The client will indemnify and hold Shenchon Company and its employees harmless against all claims by any third party or any judgmcnt for loss or damage relating to the performance or nonperformance of any services by the appraisal firm. 17. In the event of a dispute involving interpretation or application of this agreement, the parties agree that this agreement will be governed under the laws of the state of . Minnesota. 18. Shenehon Company reserves the right to assess interest charges on all unpaid accounts. 19. Shenehon Company reserves the right to refuse an assignment if a party other than the addressce of the letter signs the engagement letter. 20. Shenehon Company reserves the right to assess for any collection time incurred. 21. Liability for appraisal fees is the responsibility of the party signing the appraisal contract or the organization on whose behalf the individual is signing. 168227v2 D -6 22. Shenehon Company and/or the appraisers are not qualified to render expert opinions regarding structural issues, water damage, environmental assessments (such as mold), engineering/cneclianical issues, ADA and/or building code compliance, land planning, architectural expertise, soil conditions, audit/accounting opinions, legal opinions, credit oph&ns, or federal/statc tax matters. If requested, Shcnchon Company will recommend qualified experts in these fields to assist the client and/or advance the appraisal process. 168227v2 D -7