Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-03-05_COUNCIL MEETING`r AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MARCH 5, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of February 19, 2013 and Work Session of February 19, 2013 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 02/21/13 , TOTAL $1,230,715.07; and Pre - List Dated, 02/28/2013 TOTAL $445,223.57 and Credit Card Charges: 12/27/12 — 1/26/13 TOTAL$ 23,421.84 C. On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -Sale, and Sunday Sale, Wine And Beer Liquor License Renewals D. Park And Recreation Turf Management Plan E. Request For Purchase , — Contract ENG 13 -2, Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction F. Request For Purchase — Contract ENG 13 -3, Braemar Hills B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction G. Request For Purchase — Contract ENG 13 -4, Lake Edina Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction H. Consultant Engineering Construction Phase Services — Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction I. Request To Waive Building Permit Fee For Countryside Park Renovation Project J. Ordinance No. 2013 -02 Amending Section 1501 Of Edina City Code V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Agenda /Edina City Council March 5, 2013 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you -wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow. the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines.- • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, _clapping,_cheering_ or booing or any other form of _verbal_or nonverbal communication is not — ----- - - - - -- - -- - allowed. - -- - A. PUBLIC HEARING - Preliminary Plat With Variances, Rodney Helm on Behalf of Miriam Kiser, 5633 Tracy Avenue, Resolution No. 2013 -26 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING - Consider Resolution No. 2013 -25 Approving the Issuance of Obligations By the City of Lilydale, Minnesota To Finance A Project By Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit. their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may.not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Appointments To Advisory Boards, Committees And Commissions B. Resolution No. 2013 -27 Supporting Legislation For Street Improvement Districts IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tue Tues Tues Tues Tues m sues Tues Tues Tues Agenda/Edina City Council March 5, 2013 Page 3 A. Receive Petition Circulated By Emily Boettge Requesting Sidewalk (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. Correspondence C. Energy & Environment Commission Advisory Communication — Urban Forests Task Force (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) D. Minutes 1. Planning Commission, February 21, 2013 2. Energy & Environment Commission, December 13, 2012 and January 10, 2013 3. Heritage Preservation Board of January 8, 2013 4. Transportation Commission, January 17, 2013 E. Edina Transportation Commission Committee Recommendations X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Mar 5 Work Session —Jnt Mtng PC /Construction Management Plan 5:00 P.M. Mar 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Mar 11 Annual Meeting — Edina Advisory Boards & Commissions 5:00 p.m. Mar 19 Work Session —Jnt Mtng Health Committee /Future do.town 5:30 P.M. Mar 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Apr 2 Work Session — Business Meeting/Neighborhood Assn. 5:30 P.M. Apr 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Apr 16 Work Session — Grandview Next Steps 5:30 P.M. Apr 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Apr 30 Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 -7:00 p.m May 7 Work Session —Jnt Mtng with HRRC 5:30 P.M. May 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. May 21 Work Session — Budget 5:30 P.M. May 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. May 27 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jun 4 Work Session — TBD 5:30 P.M. Jun 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jun 18 Work Session —Jnt Mtng with EEC 5:30 P.M. Jun 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1* MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 19, 2013 7:07 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. IL ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. lll. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda as amended to add Item VIII.B., Construction Management Plan. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland' Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as submitted: IV.A. Approve regular, work session, and closed meeting minutes of February 5, 2013 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated February 7, 2013, and consisting of 25 pages; General Fund $110,120.64; Police Special Revenue $216.89; PIR Debt Service Fund $400.00; Working Capital Fund $63,794.72; Art Center Fund $1,046.38; Golf Dome Fund $278.80; Golf Course Fund $8,301.50; Ice Arena Fund $73,003.55; Edinborough Park Fund $5,641.70; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,259.25; Liquor Fund $223,431.78; Utility Fund $47,443.64; Storm Sewer Fund $5,668.78; Centennial TIF District $609,184.39; Payroll Fund $3,462.36; TOTAL $1.156.254.38 and for approval of payment of claims dated February 14, 2013, and consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $129,514.21; Police Special Revenue $4,085.92; Working Capital Fund $27,031.03; Equipment Replacement Fund $2,850.36; Art Center Fund $2,906.35; Golf Dome Fund $1,200.43; Aquatic Center Fund $618.87; Golf Course Fund $14,354.98; Ice Arena Fund $7,763.36; Edinborough Park Fund $7,771.09; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,801.68; Liquor Fund $189,005.72; Utility Fund $473,381.75; Storm Sewer Fund $10,450.03; PSTF Agency Fund $13,415.91; TOTAL $886.151.69 IV.C. Approve Change Order No 1— Braemar Public Works Site Lead Abatement IV.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -22, authorizing Metropolitan Council Sewer Rehabilitation Grant Agreement IV.E. Request for Purchase, Contract No. PIN 13 -1 Public Works Building Demolition & Disposal, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Jay Johnson Construction at $98,700.00 IV.F. Approve Special Assessment Agreements — Richmond Hills Park IV.G. Request for Purchase, Two 2013`Chevrolet Silverad6 2500 4WD Vehicles, Public Works — Parks, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $47,794.62 IV.H. Request for Purchase, 2013 Ford F350 4WD Vehicle, Public Works — Parks, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midway Commercial Ford at $25,716.48 IV.L Request for Purchase, 2013 Ford F550 Vehicle, Public Works - Utilities, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midway Commercial Ford at $36,509.48 IV.J. Request for Purchase, Emergency Repair'Well 11, Public Works - Utilities, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner & Sons at $27,151.25 IVX Request for Purchase, 2013 Bobcat X770 Skid Loader, Public Works - Streets, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Lano Equipment, Inc. at $54,887.79 Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 19, 2013 IV.L. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -23 naming the Metropolitan Council as a Permitted Designee of the Transit Easement at Southdale Center IV.M. Approve Temporary 3.2 Beer License Our Lady of Grace Church IV.N. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -24 Lot Division, 5809 and 5813 Tingdale Avenue IV.O. Approve Reappointments Human Rights & Relations Commission Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. JOHN GUNYOU -THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT PRESENTATION John Gunyou, Three Rivers Park District Chair, introduced himself as Edina's representative to the Three Rivers Park District, described Three Rivers Park District park and trail facilities, and provided an update on the trail segment planned in Edina. Mr. Gunyou. indicated Three Rivers hoped to secure funding for the western trail segment,with construction of the entire Edina trail in 2015 and 2016, noting it would include creek restoration and complete a missing link in the District's trail system. Mr. Gunyou described his - _ support for additional- outreach, -in- particular` with - seniors - and students; and the - District's desire -to- better - -- coordinate with the City of Edina. Mr. Gunyou answered questions of the Council relating to funding options to advance the project, consideration of whether The District will need to charge for vehicle parking at a park (as opposed to an enterprise property), and. neighborhood -based process to assure opportunity for input. It was noted the construction of this trail segment would coincide with construction of the southwest light rail so the City would need to address spur connections from the trail. Mr. Gunyou concurred and indicated the District was cognizant of that need. V.B. SOUTH VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CULTURAL CELEBRATION ANNOUNCED Gregory Banko, Academic Supervisor.for Student Support, and Jason Dockter, Assistant Principal at South View Middle School, described the School's diversity and invited all to attend the March 21, 2013,Cultural Celebration. V. C. EDINA NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (NO- MEMBERSHIP DISCUSSED Chad Leqve, Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) Staff Member, described the purpose of the 12- member Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) to advise on noise related topics at the Minneapolis /St. Paul International Airport. He indicated NOC had directed staff to modify its bylaws. to include the City of Edina as one of its at- large member. Those bylaw modifications would be addeessed.;at the March 20, 2013, NOC meeting. Mr. Leqve summarized the resources and information relating to noise that were available to the public including a website www.macnoise.com offering the option to receive automated updates and hosting quarterly public meetings. Mr. Leqve presented .the .February 1, 2013, letter of Jeff Hamiel, MAC CEO and General Manager, to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) relating to Area Navigation (RNAV) depar-wFe procedure implementation. that addressed timing,.,local FAA leadership as a critical component, need for holistic outreach, importance of early coordination with local community leaders, and adequate resource allocation. Mr. Leqve responded to the Council's questions relating to municipalities with NOC membership (Minneapolis, Richfield, Eagan, Mendota Heights, and Bloomington) and stated each were within or "touched" by a specific noise contour. He stated the MAC had no permanent noise monitors within the City of Edina and the noise contours were developed by a computer integrated noise model. - The Council stressed the importance for NOC to assure a process for contact with Edina's staff to provide information. Mr. Leqve agreed with that need and described how the process, that had origins in 2007, Page 2 /« Minutes /Edina City Council /February 19, 2013 had quickly unfolded and resulted in a limited timeframe to implement public education on RNAV depaFtill't- procedure implementation and receive testimony. The Council acknowledged the benefit or'RNAV, a satellite based navigation method, to conserve fuel and assure accuracy; however, it was concerned that RNAV °'S^ Fesulte °^ was being coupled with concentration of flight.tra Mr. Leqve explained there were still multiple flight paths since wind introduces variability but agreed that if RNAV was implemented, it would tighten those paths.m Member Bennett noted that the FAA representative had acknowledged in testimony before the MAC at its :November meeting that RNAV had not been implemented in full at any airport in the United States TFie Council noted there were concentrated areas :of residential. housing under the flight paths and expressed .support to. advance discussion with the FAA for partial RNAV implementation that would' add, 6 - spread out; or alternate' tracks. Mr. Leqve indicated partial RNAV implementation k ee ps s' that departure operations over Edina , the same so there would be no permanent reduction in flights over Edina, with or without RNAV With regard to creating a measure for a noise baseline, Mr. Leqve explained the approach used in, the last discussion that focused on:an integrated noise model and developing noise.contours consistent with the process given by the FAA to quantify noise related to any proposed action. T„�"�e- C4uflcir Member Bennett noted that while other communities had decades in which to plan and rezone properties to accommodate this issue, Edina's residential properties were built down to the freeways and there was no possible way to develop concentrated flight paths that do not impact residential neighborhoods. The Council asked Mr. Leqve. to assure follow up with City staff as to the FAA's response to Mr. Hamiel's letter. Mr. Leqve stated the website would be used to get out information, as well as a newsletter, and he hoped City staff would attend future NOC meetings. John Bergman, Apple Valley Councilmember and NOC member representing all at -large cities`r�� ° = ° ^ *� € a, introduced himself and stated when this situation arose, he felt it was his duty to bring Edina into NOC at -large membership. He assured the Council that Edina would have the best representation, its voice would be heard, and information made available. Mr. Bergman answered questions of the Council relating to his representation of at -large cities. He explained if the at -large cities did not unanimously support a position, a vote would be taken and that decision forwarded to NOC. However, it had always been a unanimous decision so such a vote had not been needed. Mr. Bergman assured the Council that Edina's voice would be heard. The Council credited Mr.. Leqve and Mr. Hamiel for being reactive to the City's concerns and unprecedented action by the FAA to delay RNAV implementation over northwest 30 left and 30 right runways. The Council supported use of RNAV to assure efficiency and.safety but with -1 diffused flight patterns instead of concentrated tracks and faster climb rates. MAC was encouraged to proceed slowly, consider both outreach and input of impacted communities, to look through the "lens of humanity" prior to.decision making, and to assure staff contact at a City level. Vt. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD— Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT— RESOLUTION NO. 2013-19 —ADOPTED Associate Planner Presentation Associate Planner Repya :described the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and recommended allocation of Edina's 2013 allotment of $.110,285 as follows: Public Services- Senior Community Services (H.O.M.E- Housing and Outdoor Maintenance for the Elderly) of $9,618, Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) of $4,700, and Homel.ine $2,225 (equaling $16,543 or 15% of total); and, Community Development - Rehabilitation of Private' Property Program of $41,491, West Page 3 46 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 19, 2013 Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) for its Homes Within Reach Program of $52,521 (equaling $93;742 or 85% of total), Ms. Repya reviewed the methods used to advertise the CDBG Program. Ms. Itepya answered questions of the Council related to the lower number of seniors served since 2011 by Senior Community Services and described.ave.nues of outreach to alert seniors of services available. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:07 p.m. Public Testimony Kitty Engle, HOME Senior Community Services Program Director, described .the services provided to 90 Edina seniors on a sliding scale to help them live independently as long as possible and improve the City's housing stock. She explained the number of seniors served in 2012 was lower due to smaller snowfalls and fewer calls for service. Dana Slimmer, Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin ( CAPSH.), reported on the services provided to Edina residents in 2012 and thanked the Council for its long- standing support. She answered -- -- --- questions -of the- Council- related -to- their-- work - ,with - clients- experiencing- foreclosure - and - with - lenders -on- - -- -- prevention strategies. Member Brindle stated she was recently- appointed.and looked forward to serving on the CAPSH Board. Beth Kodluboy, Executive Director. of HomeLine, summarized the tenant advocacy services provided and goal to give Edina's residents the tools needed to solve problems. Janet Lindbo, Executive Director of . the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT), described the services provided by Homes within Reach to purchase, rehab, and resell homes while maintaining ownership of the property to make housing more affordable to qualified buyers. She answered questions of the Council related to HUD income guidelines and demographic profile of Edina residents who made use of their services. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett,' Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -19, approving proposed use of 2013 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Funds and authorizing execution of subrecipient agreement with Hennepin County and any third party agreements. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI. B. VACATION APPEAL, 5801 CRESCENT TERRACE —RESOLUTION NO. 2013-20 —ADOPTED Assistant Planning Presentation Assistant Planner Aaker presented the appeal by Kevin Gilligan of the request by Nicole Sunberg for a 25.85 -foot front yard setback variance to construct a new two -story Mediterranean -style home at 5801 Crescent Terrace. She advised that in this case, the average front yard setback would be 71 7.75 feet. Ms. Aaker presented the proposed site plan and indicated that on December 12, 2012, the Planning Commission had recommended, on a 7 to 1 vote, approval of a 25.85 -foot front yard setback variance that would have placed the new home at the same 51.9 -foot nonconforming front yard setback as the existing home on the site built in 1953. Subsequent to that recommendation, an appeal was filed by Kevin Gilligan, a neighbor to the north of the subject site. On February 13, 2013, the City Clerk received a notice of conditional settlement of the variance appeal indicating the appellant would withdraw the pending appeal Page 4 ., Minutes /Edina City Council /February 19, 2013 provided the Council approved and ratified all of the terms and conditions of the proposed reduced variance as agreed upon by the applicant Nicole Sunberg and the appellant Kevin Gilligan. Ms. Aaker noted under this agreement, the garage would be shifted to the other side of the site and the pool would be located on the western portion of the property. She reviewed the conditions of the reduced variance of 9.75 feet, and recommended approval. Appellant Presentation Kevin Gilligan, 5804 Crescent Terrace, than the Council for listening to the concerns he and his immediate neighbors had voiced, which had been a good experience. Mr. Gilligan stated he found the Planning Department and Planning Commission had not been interested in addressing the concerns of the neighborhood until an appeal was filed that resulted in significant legal expense. He suggested this appeal process would not have been necessary had the Planning Department and Planning Commission taken a different approach. Mayor Hovland asked whether the outcome had been satisfactory to adjoining property owners. Mr. Gilligan answered -in the affirmative. Mayor Hovland noted the structured agreement had not included the proposed landscaping between the driveway and street as depicted in the preliminary site plan dated February 11, 2013. Mr. Gilligan stated that issue was not currently a specified condition but he would not object to making it one. Proponent Presentation Nate Wissink, Streeter & Associates, Inc., representing the proponent, stated the documents update the inaccurate calculation of the front yard setback at 68 feet. He stated they were appreciative of the appellant's efforts to work with them subsequent to the Planning Commission's recommendation. Mr. Wissink advised the structure of the agreement as it related to the immediate neighbors of 5801 Crescent Terrace was satisfactory to the Sunbergs. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. Public Testimony Marcus Mollison, Lindquist and Vennum, representing appellant Kevin Gilligan, addressed the Council and indicated the site plan should be part of the agreement as it identified the actual building footprint. Mr. Wissink stated his concurrence. Tim Grande, 5701 Dale Avenue, representing Brad and Susan Baker, neighbors to the southeast of this site, addressed the Council. With regard to the survey discrepancy, Attorney Knutson advised the City had no part in deciding location of property lines and it would not impact the granting of this variance. Ann Bentdahl, 4905 Rolling Green Parkway, read a letter on behalf of Suzanne and Kip Knelman of 4812 Rolling Green Parkway. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. With regard to the survey discrepancy, Mr. Wissink stated they relied on the Woodrow Brown survey dated November 25, 2012, that had been submitted with the application. He explained the Moen Estate conducted a survey with Herb LaMere in April of 2006 when the Baker's pool was installed that included a Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 19, 2013 south property line discrepancy. Mr. Wissink. stated they had been in touch with Messrs. LaMere and Brown relating to the survey discrepancy noting, however, that it had no impact on the variance outcome. Ms. Aaker presented the City's standards for determining an average setback and variance issuance as well as staff's rationale for recommending approval as detailed in the report. The Council discussed the appeal and terms of the settlement agreement and asked questions of Attorney Knutson related to the grandfathering concept. He explained a subsequent property owner had a period of one year in which to.tear down and rebuild but could not expand the nonconformity. With regard to .process, Attorney Knutson explained that upon appeal, the Council could refer it to the Planning Commission should a settlement expand the request. The Council considered what aspects were the most significant, when addressing massing: the neighborhood; the lot; or, the house design. Member Bennett read the Comprehensive Plan description of Ithe Interlachen area (Rolling Green and Hilidale) as a Garden Suburb with "mature trees, regular building setbacks and massing" and "characterized by larger lots, larger homes and proportionally more green !space. She- stated- that the Site Location -- map in -the Staff Report depicted- seven -or more similarly -- - -- I configured curved and pie- shaped lots: It was noted the appeal and settlement agreement. reduced the approved and granted front yard,setback variance from 25.85 feet to 9.75 feet. Support was expressed, to add a condition addressing the preliminary site plan and revised setback information. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -20, approving a Front Yard Setback Variance at 5.801 Crescent Terrace based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as the proposed home will uphold the established front setback pattern already existing on the block. b. The practical difficulties in ;complying with the ordinance include the triangular shape of the lot and resulting amount of front yard that must be maintained given the required setback and the imposition of a deeper front yard setback given that the lot has always had a home located closer to the street than neighboring properties. 2. With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 3. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 4. The proposal is in harmony with the intent of the ordinance since it will allow replacement of a home that had occupied the lot in the past and was originally located closer to the street. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The front street setback variance to be granted shall be reduced to 9.75 feet. 2. The home and garage to be constructed on the property shall be built within the boundaries specified on the applicant's approved revised plans date stamped by the City on February 11, 2013. 3. The garage to be constructed on the property shall not exceed a single story in height. 4. The plans shall not contain, nor. shall applicant permit the construction or installation of, any large driveway turnaround depicted on the original site plans that the applicant submitted to the City in connection with the original variance application. S. The home to be constructed shall be according to the preliminary site plan updated on February 19, 2013, with revised setback information dated February 19, 2013. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Member Brindle stated her intent to vote against the motion because she found the practical difficulty did not reside with the property but, rather, was self - created by the potential property owner in trying to fit a pre - designed house onto this lot. Attorney Knutson advised the variance terminology was difficult and recently changed. The term "undue hardship" was no longer a statute term and the substituted term was "practical difficulties." Consideration was whether the property owner proposed to use the property in a Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 19, 2013 reasonable manner not permitted by zoning ordinances and the plight of the land owners was due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner. Member Bennett stated while she appreciated the work of staff and residents engaging in productive discussions to reach an agreement, after considering all materials before the Council and testimony, she could not find the standards for a variance had been satisfied and would vote against the motion. Members Swenson, Sprague, and Mayor Hovland advocated in support of the motion, finding practical difficulties were created by the road curvature, lot configuration, and the City's "elastic" setback. Ayes: Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett, Brindle Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-21 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -21 accepting various donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN —DIRECTION GIVEN The Council discussed concerns related to adverse impacts from residential home demolition and reconstruction. Support was voiced to direct Attorney Knutson to review and determine elements missing from ordinances to adequately address construction management issues and provide a recommendation on whether ordinance amendments or a new ordinance should be considered. Issues of concern included ability to enforce the Construction Management Plan, creation of a penalty matrix that incorporated escalating fines and issuance of a stop work order until compliance was gained,-excess consumption of City services; method of creating foundations and requirement for bracing; requirement of bonding for excavation projects; asbestos and lead paint abatement to assure protection of the environment and surrounding neighbors; cross filing complaints by date, address, and builder; and, prohibition of leaving household items such as appliances outdoors. Attorney Knutson advised that violation of City ordinance was a misdemeanor with fines imposed by the court system. However, in certain categories of offenses, the court could consider and impose a City fine without the requirement of a court date. In that case, the fine could be appealed to the court, if desired. Attorney Knutson stated he would research the State Building Code to determine the opportunity to issue a stop work order for violation. The Council asked whether the City could institute a civil matrix penalty system and Construction Board of Appeals to consider a decision to impose a civil penalty. Attorney Knutson advised there was not specific statutory authority to allow such a system. Community Development Director Teague explained that the Construction Management Plan requirement went into effect six weeks ago so any construction project since that date required the builder to sign the Construction Management Plan, which was handled on a complaint basis by building inspectors. Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 19, 2013 Manager Neal indicated staff would be addressing the management of this issue, which might require a staff member dedicated to only that - issue. In addition, there might be need for additional regulatory considerations such as fencing the lot during redevelopment projects. He stated another option was to consider increasing the demolition permit fee to cover additional public costs. The Council indicated support to consider additional staffing hours to assure complaints on residential construction, projects were properly addressed. The Council directed..staff to review the questions posed relating to the Construction Management Plan and provide a report and recommendation at the March 5, 2013 Council meeting. The Council also asked staff to address the complaint received relating to trash left outdoors. at a home under reconstruction on 59`" and St. Johns. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. -- 1. PARK BOARD, JANUARYS, 2013 2. ART CENTER BOARD, JANUARY 24, 2013 3. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DECEMBER 20, 2012 Informational; no action required. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received Xll. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 5, 2013. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the February 19, 2013, meeting available. Page 8 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 19, 2013 5:35 P.M. CALL TO ORDER /ROLL CALL Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members.Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague entered the meeting at 5:40 p.m. Art Center Board Members attending the meeting were: Hafed Bouassida, Barbara LaValleur, Dana Lappin, Ray Meifert, Colin Nelson, Kitty O'Dea, John Swon and.William McCabe Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Michael Frey, Art Center Director; Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator; Ann Kattreh, Parks and Recreation Director; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; and Scott Neal, City Manager. Art Center Director Frey led off the presentation updating the Council on the status of the Art Center Board recommendations from the Sutton & Associates' Study and the Art Center's mission statement. He turned the presentation over to members of the Board who reviewed: transitioning from an Art Center Board to the Arts & Culture Commission, the 3 d Annual Edina Film & Music Festival scheduled for July 26 and 27, 2013 and the four issues identified by the Arts and Culture Working Group. The issues were: 1) community space for the arts in Edina; 2) review and update of Edina's Code of Ordinances to make them supportive of artists working in the community; 3) art communication and awareness; and 4) strong connection to the arts and artists from the residents and leaders of the City of Edina through awareness and funding. The Council and Art Board discussed many aspects of the issues. It was suggested that staff have the necessary ordinance amendments drafted to transition from the Art Center Board to the Arts and Culture Commission, but to keep the size of the commission the same. The findings of the Art and Cultural Working Group should be presented in writing by April of 2013. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 19, 2013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:43:45 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 2/2112013 - 2/2112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368558 212112013 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 518.70 UB TEMP 308200 37275497 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 518.70 368559 212112013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 119.60 308343 1654126 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 69.20 308429 1653686 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 188.80 368560 212112013 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 200.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 308201 119169 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 200.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 308201 119169 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 374.43 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 308201 119169 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 700.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 308201 119169 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 700.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 308201 119169 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,174.43 368561 212112013 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 34,192.80 RECYCLING 308202 3094578 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 34,192.80 368562 212112013 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 87.45 BUMPERS 00005002 308203 AFS- 230390004 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 87.45 368563 212112013 131691 AMERICAN RESTAURANT SUPPLY & W 1,094.40 CONCESSION RENOVATION 308596 3019 5500.1785 CONCESSION EQUIP ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 1,094.40 368664 212112013 100666 AMSAN 70.78 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 00001614 308204 281307355 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 66.69 00001614 308205 281307363 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 137.47 368666 212112013 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 663.86 CONCESSION PRODUCT 308283 1877657 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 492.09 CONCESSION PRODUCT 00002304 308396 1877557 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,155.95 368566 212112013 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,587.35 CEILING TILES 308206 10054913 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 1,587.35 R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2/21/2013 - 2121/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368567 7/21/2013 121985 ARROW HOCKEY AND SPORT CORP 319.74 FILTER, GRINDING WHEELS 00002395 308397 0059291 -IN 5761.6406 319.74 368568 212112013 131585 ASHCROFT, ERNIE & ELIZABETH 6,800.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 308284 021113 100441705.20 6.800.00 368569 212112013 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 408.70 ROLLOFF DUMPSTER 308580 1180879 5511.6406 408.70 368570 212112013 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG 100.01 JAN 2013 MILEAGE 308581 021213 5510.6107 100.01 368571 212112013 118955 BCBS OF MN 1,276.40 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 308389 DAVE BUCHANAN 1470.4329 1,276.40 368572 212112013 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 460.24 RINK GLASS 308210 00092965 5521.6406 1,300.46 RINK GLASS 00008051 308211 00092965 5521.6406 1,760.70 368573 212112013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 796.40 308344 76922800 5862.5513 1,442.55 308345 77003100 5862.5512 224.69 308346 87982700 5842.5515 1,260.90 308430 77002700 5842.5512 53.14 308431 88010300 5822.5515 182.13 308432 77002900 5822.5512 121.55 308541 77003000 5822.5513 41.00 308542 77002800 5842.5515 103.12 308543 88010200 5842.5515 63.44 308544 88010400 5862.5515 108.70 308545 6288600 5862.5515 36.55 308546 77003200 5862.5515 20.70- 308547 88007800 5822.5515 4,413.47 2/2012013 7:43:45 Page- 2 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONSULTING DESIGN LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:43:45 `- R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 2/21/2013 - 2/2112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368574 212112013 126139 BERNICK'S 681.80 308433 42659 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 681.80 368575 -212112013 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY, 114.95 COFFEE 308491 1072931 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 114.95 368576 212112013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 60.66 POST-IT-NOTES 308207 WO- 831210 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL _. 4.86 TABS 308208 OE- 309819 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 155:81 FOLDERS, BINDERS 308209 0E- 309764 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING . 8.53 RIBBONS 308285 OE- 310472 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 42.50 FILE FOLDERS 00009235 308319 OE- 309804 -1 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 66.25- RETURN 308398 CP- WO- 829234 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 206.11 - 368577 212112013 103832 BLACK 8 DECKER U.S. INC. 161.99 BATTERY 00003566 308320 02054806 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.99- CREDIDT 308321 02054993 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.99 BATTERY 00003566 308322 02054853 -1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 312:99 368578 2/2112013 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 412.54 COMPACTOR RENTAL - DEC 2012 308390 DEC 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 412.54 COMPACTOR RENTAL- JAN 2013 308399.. JAN 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 825.06 368579 •- 212112013 102645. BLUE CROSS.& BLUE SHIELD OF MN 153,945.00 MAR 2013 PREMIUM 308492 . LOG10 -Ai MAR 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 19,012.00 308493 MAR2013 1550.6043. COBRA INSURANCE -_ CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 172;957:00 368580 212112013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 168.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003587 308323 84136 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 168.37 368581 2/2112013 131494 - BONNER 8 LEACH LLP 18,333.06 JAN 2013 FEES 308212 JAN 2013 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 18,333.06 368582 2/2112013 119351- BOURGET IMPORTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 4 2/21/2013 - 2121/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 289.50 308347 111963 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 65.50 308348 111948 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 355.00 368583 2/2112013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 31.94 OIL BATH 00005008 308494 715241 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 929.00 RIMS, BRAKES, HUB 00005005 308495 714534 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 511.39 BRAKE, HUB 00005008 308496 715241X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.78 HUB CAP, OIL BATH 00005005 308497 714536 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 141.41 SENSOR 00005009 308498 715678 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 491.92- CREDIT 00005855 308499 CM703765 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,203.60 368584 212112013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 308608 021913 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30.00 368586 212112013 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11,413.17 LEGAL 308582 2851 -000G -1/13 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 11,413.17 368586 212112013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 34.85 308434 238772 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 480.95 308435 238771 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,162.85 308436 238768 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 29.85 308437 238769 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,708.50 368587 212112013 129923 CAWLEY 25.96 NAME BADGES 308500 V144915 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 25.96 368588 212112013 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 123.71 308213 8000014561 -7 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 2/13 165.05 308213 8000014561 -7 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 2/13 383.79 306213 8000014561 -7 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 2/13 392.90 308213 8000014561 -7 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 2/13 394.88 308213 8000014561 -7 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA 2120 /2013 7:43:45 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 2/21/2013 — 212112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2113 486.98 308213 8000014561 -7 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 2/13 941.90 308213 8000014561 -7 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 2113 986.19 308213 8000014561 -7 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 2/13 1,084.90 308213 8000014561 -7 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2/13 1,333.65 308213 8000014561 -7 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2/13 1,403.66 308213 8000014561 -7 5420:6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 2/13 1,709.01 308213 8000014561 -7 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 2/13 1,914.25 308213 8000014561 -7 5761.6186 , HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2113 2,997.08 308213 8000014561 -7 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 2/13 3,253.22 308213 8000014561 -7 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2113 8,769.96 308213 8000014561 -7 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2113 26,341.13 368589 212112013 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 45.96 308400 2562182 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 7,292.78 308401 2561722 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 7,338.74 368590 2/2112013 123898 CENTURYLINK 58.27 952 9441841 308214 1841 -2113 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 107.22 952 835 -1161 308215 1161 -2/13 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 205.88 952 835 -6661 308216 6661 -2113 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 155.32 952 285 -2951 308217 2951 -2113 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 104.93 612 E23 -0652 GV911 308218 0652 -2113 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 631.62 368691 212112013 118680 CITY OF EDINA 186.06 BUILDING PERMIT - OFFICE REMODEL 308583 021913 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 186.06 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2121/2013 — 2121/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368592 2/2112013 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 256.80 308548 0178027232 5842.5515 256.80 368593 2/2112013 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 437.00 COCOA, COFFEE 00002305 308402 0741757 -IN 5761.5510 437.00 368594 2/21/2013 120433 COMCAST 29.08 8772 10 614 0220686 308287 220686 -2/13 5710.6105 143.40 8772 10 614 0419858 308584 419858 -2/13 5510.6105 172.48 368595 212112013 101590 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE 14,500.00 2013 SERVICES 308243 2013 -5 1504.6103 14,500.00 368596 2/2112013 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 659.00 DRAIN CLEANING 308324 94213 1470.6215 659.00 368597 212112013 104020 DALCO 2,007.26 ICE MELT 00001697 308501 2568386 4090.6406 2,007.26 368598 2/2112013 131589 DAVIES, DIANE 52.00 ART WORK SOLD 308325 021213 5101.4413 52.00 368599 2121/2013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,563.72 308349 688341 5862.5514 44.80 308350 688342 5862.5515 67.20 308438 688345 5842.5515 1,380.80 308439 688343 5822.5514 3,767.25 308440 688344 5842.5514 8,823.77 368600 212112013 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURAN 2,106.25 MAR 2013 STD INSURANCE 308288 021113 9900.2033.16 2,106.25 368601 212112013 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2/2012013 7:43:45 Page - 6 Business Unit YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER LTD - 99 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PAYROLL CLEARING CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:43:45 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 7 2/21/2013 - 2121/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 59.17 SOCKETS 00005004 308244 767919 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.74 SOCKETS, PLUG SET 00005004 308245 768008 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.91 368602 212112013 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 6,705.15 JAN 2013 SURCHARGE 308403 16193053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 6,705.15 368603 212112013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 151.20 650487671 308585 650487671 -2/13 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 151.20 368604 2121/2013 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 635.25 RECYCLING MAILER 308597 5298 -02 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 68.43 EDINA LIQUOR MAILING 308598 5338 -01 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 68.45 EDINA LIQUOR MAILING 308598 5338-01 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 68.45 EDINA LIQUOR MAILING 308598 5338 -01 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 840.58 368605 2121/2013 131590 DOOLEY, BETH 346.75 ART WORK SOLD 308326 021113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 346.75 368606 212112013 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 397.62 LEGAL- SOUTHDALE DEVELOPMENT 308246 1853673 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 397.62 368607 212112013 131586 DOWNING, GINGER_ 207.22 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 308289 6304 LIMERICK 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LANE 207.22 368608 212112013 106020 EDINA RESOURCE CENTER 39,863.00 2013 FUNDING 308247 2013 1507.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FAMILINK EDINA 39,863.00 368609 212112013 103594 EDINALARM INC. 135.00 ALARM SERVICE REPAIRS 308248 78934 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 135.00 368610 212112013 100049 EHLERS 2,500.00 CASH FLOW PROJECTION 308404 345882 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 8 2121/2013 - 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 500.00 GRANDVIEW PAYBACK 308405 345883 9234.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 500.00 TIF CALCULATIONS 308406 345884 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,500.00 368611 212112013 131646 ELRICK, DREW 125.00 FOREI LOGO DESIGN 308502 EDI -002 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 125.00 368612 2121/2013 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 84.79 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003870 308327 1530693 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.79 368613 2121/2013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 213,330.99. PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 308328 022213 05536.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WATER METER REPLACEMENT 213,330.99 368614 212112013 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 255.21 AD FOR BID 308407 10236094 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 255.21 368615 212112013 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 344.78 ROPE RESCUE SUPPLIES 00003553 308329 7822 421480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT 344.78 368616 212112013 130699 FLEETPRIDE 317.69 MULTIFASTER KITS 00005962 308249 52322762 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 317.69 368617 212112013 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY- MINNEA 11.09 AUTO PARTS 308408 013113 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 208.82 AUTO PARTS 308408 013113 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 258.66 AUTO PARTS 308408 013113 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 478.57 368618 2121/2013 130461 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC. 4,850.00 LICENSE & MAINTENANCE 308586 07 -9084 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 4,850.00 368619 2121/2013 101103 GRAINGER 371.41 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, BRACKETS 00001639 308250 9055977863 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 131.35 SPEAKERS 00001632 308290 9060489888 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,230.02 BATTERIES 00003583 308330 9057227457 421480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT CITY OF EDINA 2/20 /2013 7:43:45 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 2121/2013 — 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,732.78 368620 212112013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,398.00 308351 149139 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 671.75 308441 149131 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,069.75 368621 212112013 114514 H & R CONST. CO. 930.50 GUARDRAIL REPAIR 308503 14489 1343.6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 1,995.80 GUARDRAIL REPAIR 308504 14488 1343.6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 2,926.30 368622 212112013 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 1,278.57 MAR 2013 PREMIUM 308505 42704442 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 11,883.38 308506 42708005 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 13,161.95 368623 2/21/2013 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,546.70 RADIO ADMIN FEE 308251 130138015 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,272.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE 308331 130138014 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 651.90 RADIO ADMIN FEE 308507 130138077 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4,470.60 368624 212112013 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 705.44 FIRE PROTECTION TRAINING 308409 00284697 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 705.44 368625 212112013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 634.00 308352 635060 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 56.00 308353 635061 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 435.00 308442 635415 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,563.95 308443 635335 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,688.95 368626 212112013 102044 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 12,799.93 COUNTRYSIDE PK PLANNING 308587 012 -042 -6 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH 12,789.93 368627 2/21/2013 119627 HOOGENAKKER, JACKIE 58.14 FOOD FOR MEETING 308291 021213 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 58.14 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/20 /2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 10 2/21/2013 - 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368628 2/2112013 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 609.98 MAIL LATE NOTICES 308332 73973 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 609.98 368629 212112013 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 300.00 308549 11045 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 300.00 368630 212112013 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIAT 780.00 OFFICIATING FEES 308508 494 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINAATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 780.00 368631 212112013 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 101.53 MOUTHPIECES 00003148 308292 383435 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 101.53 368632 212112013 126031 J.S. PALUCH COMPANY INC. 26.96 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 308293 1225394 -1/13 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 26.96 368633 212112013 100828 JERRY S FOODS 16.46 308333 . 013113 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 38.78 308333 013113 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 63.31 308333 013113 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 121.76 308333 013113 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 240.31 368634 2121/2013 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE 1.69 308509 012513 1322.640.6 GENERALSUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2.81 308509 012513 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4.25 308509 012513 4090.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 9.82 308509 012513 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 10.90 308509 012513 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 13.24 308509 012513 1495.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 16.72 308509 012513 1400.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.91 308509 012513 5861.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 45.09 308509 012513 1553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.98 308509 012513 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 134.26 308509 012513 1301.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 203.58 308509 012513 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 315.85 308509 012513 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 366.12 308509 012513 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 11 2/21/2013 - 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,273.22 368635 212112013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 2,087.80 1,150.00 224.00 7,216.95 18.00 39.05 36.04- 560.00 11,259.76 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 308354 2029330 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 308444 2029332 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 308445 2029333 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 308446 2029342 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 308447 2029341 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 308448 2029343 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 308449 2029340 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 308550 2029357 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 368636 212112013 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 36.34 ICE MELT 00006363 308410 63656930 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 36.34 368638 212112013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,603.53 308355 1501853 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,017.20 308356 1501855 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7,926.44 308357 1501850 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,667.20 308358 1501829 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,674.68 308359 1501851 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR .19 308360 1501832 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 312.04 308361 1501856 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 365.67 308362 1501854 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 266.68 308363 1497201 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 421.15 308450 1501846 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 445.12 308451 1501827 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 29.12 308452 1501845 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 20.99 308453 1501844 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,790.10 308454 1501843 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 46.62 308455 1501842 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,874.58 308456 1501841 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,092.99 308457 1501830 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 25.07 308458 1501849 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,272.39 308459 1501848 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 80.00 308460 1499424 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 99.03 308461 1491656 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 12,889.80 308462 1501840 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 189.65 308463 1501835 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 497.60 308464 1497200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2120 /2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 12 2121/2013 - 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 899.35 308465 1501831 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 93.73 308466 1501837 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 91.12 308467 1501834 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 27.77- 308468 565995 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,348.24 308551 1501847 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,975.52 308552 1503094 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 222.72 308553 1503088 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 62.74 308554 1501852 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,000.02 308555 1501828 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 546.64 308556 1501833 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,597.96 308557 1501836 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7.59- 308558 566538 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 53,410.52 368639 212112013 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 113.83 IGNITION CONTROL 00001635 308469 183249 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 113.83 368640 2/2112013 131593 KAGEL, ABBIE 12.00 SPRING CLASS OVERCHARGE 308588 REFUND 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 12.00 368641 212112013 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 13.11 CAP SCREWS 00005991 308510 9301422652 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.11 368642 2/2112013 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORT 4,018.50 TRAVELACCIDENT INSURANCE 308286 ABL 962671 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,018.50 368643 212112013 100858 LOGIS 50.00 NETWORK SUPPORT 308391 36133 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 219.30 NETWORK SUPPORT 308391 36133 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,478.40 MAINTENANCE ON SWITCH 308391 36133 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 4,344.38 HORNETS NEST EQUIPMENT 308391 36133 5500.1706 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 153.90 NETMOTION LICENSE 308599 36163 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 6,245.98 368644 212112013 102129 LOVEGREEN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 583.92 CONVEYOR BELT REPLACEMENT 308252 107072 5821.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 583.92 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/2012013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 13 2/21/2013 - 212112013' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368645 2/2112013 101792 LUBE -TECH 1,411.70 GAS 308411 2166552 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,348.01 DIESEL 308412 2166553 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,759.71 368646 212112013 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 3,348.12 MILLING BITS 308512 8868 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,348.12 368647 212112013 120701 MADISON, DANIEL 500.50 BROOMBALL OFFICIATING 308513 021513 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 500.50 368648 212112013 102237 MANGEN, DEBRA 88.26 2012 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 308392 2012 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 177.69 2012 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 308392 2012 1180.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ELECTION 265.95 368649 212112013 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 1,350.00 PUBLIC. SAFETY ASSESSMENTS 308253 8285 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,350.00 368650 212112013 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 280.00 HOSTING FEE 308511 179 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 280.00 368651 2121/2013 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 1,139.82 NETLINK FINAL CONTRACT DUE 00004375 308600 0071244 -IN 5800.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,139.82 368652 212112013 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC. 1,241.68 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003562 308334 22181 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,241.68 368653 2121/2013 101483 MENARDS 40.59 WATER FILTERS 00001626 308254 16224 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 36.36 LUMBER 00001578 308514 14679 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 51.20 TAPE MEASURERS 00001584 308515 14974 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5.93 PAIL 00001607 308516 15571 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 41.54 ANCHORS, CAULK GUN 00001624 308517 16174 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 127.04 LUMBER, ROLLERS 00001627 308518 16245 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 61.35 PAINT, BRUSHES 00001631 308519 16325 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/21/2013 - 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 17.07 ACRYLIC, ADHESIVE 00001473 308601 12011 1551.6406 81.40 CARPET REPAIR SUPPLIES 00001479 308602 12339 1551.6406 27.14 CARPET REPAIR SUPPLIES 00001483 308603 12381 .1551.6406 15.76 TROWEL, ADHESIVE 00001487 308604 12521 1551.6406 505.38 368654 212112013 100885 METRO SALES INC 544.00 COPIER USAGE 00008050 308255 500299 5510.6105 544.00 368655 2/21/2013 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 308335 4284 4077.6103 142.50 368656 212112013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,817.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE LINE 00001673 308294 34300 5913.6180 1,837.50 SERVICE LINE REPAIR 00001674 308295 34301 5913.6180 4,655.00 368657 2/2112013 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.34 WINDOW CLEANING 308256 928007330 5821.6180 5.34 368658 212112013 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 62.50 SOIL REMEDIATION 308296 7700005680 05535.1705.20 269.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 308413 2200088331 5422.6182 331.50 368659 2/2112013 118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPAS 255.00 DUES - ERIC ROGGEMAN 308257 2013 1160.6105 255.00 368660 2121/2013 100898 MINVALCO 330.78 ACTUATOR MOTOR 00001696 308520 887724 1552.6406 330.78 368661 212112013 101796 MPCA 45.00 CERTIFICATION FEE 308521 TRAVIS IVERSON 5919.6260 45.00 368662 2121/2013 124571 MURPHY, WENDY 12.70 308589 REIMBURSEMENT 5511.6406 Subledger Account Description GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Page - 14 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY CONSULTING DESIGN PW BRAEMAR SITE LEAD ABATEMENT RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013,7A3:45 Council Check Register Page - 15 2/21/2013 - 2/2112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account Description Business Unit 374.03 308589. REIMBURSEMENT 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 386.73 368663 212112013 127547. NEAL, SCOTT H. 227.00 MEETING EXPENSES 308297 021313 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS - 105.32 JAN 2013 MILEAGE 308298 021413 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE `,_ ADMINISTRATION 99.90 DEC 2012 MILEAGE 308393 2012 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 150.79 NOV 2012 MILEAGE 308393 2012 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 583.01 368664 - 212112013 117098 NELSON, COLIN 44.85 - ART WORK SOLD 308336 021113 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 44.85 368665 212112013 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 195.32 TABLE COVERS. 308299 212920 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 195.32 368666 212112013 10.0076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 657.00 308364 79422 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING _ 235.00 308365 79423 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 215.00 308470 79424 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,107.00 368667 212112013 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 56.00 UNIFORM SHIRTS 00005604 308605 NIA6065B 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 56.00 _ 368668 212112013 101620" NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 927.76 STEEL 00005003 308258 252517 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 927.76 368669 212112013 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 FEB 2013 SERVICE 308259 80858895 1400.6230 - SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 368670 212112013 131587 OASIS FOR YOUTH 2,200.00 2013 SERVICES 308300 120 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 2,200.00 _ 368671 7/2112013 106901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 300.00 BUS GARAGE STUDY 308414 020613 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT . . R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/21/2013 — 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 300.00 368672 212112013 131287 OLIVER CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 870.01 RESTROOM ADDITION PROJECT 00002323 308415 4016 5750.1720 3,500.00 308416 4017 5750.1720 4,370.01 368673 212112013 116225 OLMSTEAD COUNTY 285.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 308301 021313 1000.2055 285.00 368674 2121/2013 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 650.61 CHAIN SLINGS 308522 510135 1301.6556 650.61 368675 212112013 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 720.75 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 308417 48897 5761.6230 720.75 368676 212112013 119486 PARAGON BLACK DIRT 2,500.00 STREET SWEEPINGS DISPOSAL 308523 4507 1301.6182 2,500.00 368677 212112013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 448.80 308366 8387653 -IN 5862.5513 2,974.70 308471 8387640 -IN 5842.5513 893.68 308559 8387651 -IN 5822.5513 191.06 308560 8387992 -IN 5862.5513 144.25- 308561 8387909 -CM 5822.5513 4,363.99 368678 212112013 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 1,827.50 IT CONSULTING 308302 20913009 1554.6103 1,827.50 368679 212112013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 356.04 308260 09421501 5520.5510 353.30 308562 00114793 5862.5515 709.34 368680 212112013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 77.90 308367 2376263 5842.5514 Subledger Account Description BUILDINGS BUILDINGS 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Page - 16 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING RUBBISH REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER ARENA CONCESSIONS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 17 2/21/2013 - 2121/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 91.12 308368 2371571 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 167.19 308369 2378217 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 569.79 308370 2378218 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,263.49 308371 2378216 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,244.38 308472 2378214 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 285.43 308473 2378210 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 207.84 308563 2378208 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 954.63 308564 2378213 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,023.68 308565 2378215 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,815.36 308566 2378209 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 655.84 308567 2378211 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD W1NE 50TH ST SELLING 13,356.65 368681 212112013 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 142.50 STAFF PORTRAITS 308261 021013 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 142.50 368682 212112013 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 299.25 BEAD SEAT BAND, LOCK RING 00005778 308524 210045627 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.13 TIRE REPAIR 00005778 308525 210045469 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 213.17 TIRES 00005917 308526 021313 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.21- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 308527 0000000002 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 571.34 368683 212112013 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 4,465.50 DIRECTORY POSTAGE 308528 021513 1130.6235 POSTAGE COMMUNICATIONS 4,465.50 368684 212112013 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 65.58 622833 WATER 308303 312653713 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 65.58 368685 2/2112013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 68.72 STEPSTOOL 00002286 308305 5907 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 510.06 LINERS, ROLL TOWELS, TISSUE 00002078 308306 5887 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 388.51 ICE MELT, PAPER TOWELS 00002283 308307 5893 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,536.44 PLATES, CUTLERY SETS 00002285 308308 5896 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 437.01 CUPS, LIDS 00002285 308309 5897 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 361.87 TISSUE, GLOVES, TOWELS 00002289 308310 5904 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 405.09 LINERS, WIPERS, TISSUE 00002303 308590 5892 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,707.70 R55CKREG LOG20000 CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET BUILDINGS CITY OF EDINA CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET Council Check Register 2121/2013 — 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368686 2121/2013 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 17,074.36 2013 SERVICE AGREEMENT 308304 62150 1554.6230 17,074.36 368687 212112013 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 493.92 ZAMBONI REPAIR 00008049 308262 0051727 -IN 5521.6180 493.92 368688 2121/2013 131692 RANHEIM, PAUL 7,477.42 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 308591 0000001 5500.1785 7,477.42 368689 212112013 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 268.99 SAFETY BOOTS 308529 2680000000408 1301.6610 300.00 SAFETY BOOTS 308529 2680000000408 5761.6406 568.99 368690 2121/2013 122170 REGION 3AA 562.06 GIRLS FINAL QUARTER % 308592 021113 5511.6136 562.06 368691 212112013 129594 RIDGEWOOD TILE AND STONE INSTA 7,252.38 STONEWORK FOR NEW GROTTO 308311 13 -0129 5700.1720 7,252.38 368692 212112013 125199 SCHADEGG, ANTHONY 89.38 SUPPLIES FOR GALLERY 308337 021113 5111.6406 89.38 368693 212112013 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 281.87 KIT, LAMPS 00005001 308530 P08003 1553.6530 281.87 368694 212112013 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 59.75 JOIST HANGERS 00002301 308418 41087318 5750.1720 4,007.65 LUMBER 00002301 308419 41089373 5750.1720 3,037.43 WINDOWS 00002301 308420 41089606 5750.1720 325.49 MATERIALS FOR ADDITION 00002301 308421 41089607 5750.1720 50.30 MATERIALS FOR ADDITION 00002301 308422 41090109 5750.1720 7,480.62 368695 212112013 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Page - 18 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT CONCESSION EQUIP ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2120/2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 19 2/21/2013 — 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 24,500.00 2013 SERVICES 308263 2013 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 24,500.00 368696 2/2112013 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 95.28 NAME PLATES 308423 43423 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 95.28 368697 212112013 101000 SIR SPEEDY 177.95 BUSINESS CARDS 308264 75643 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 177.95 368698 212112013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,342.00 308372 1001590 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,404.92 308373 1002627 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,027.00 308374 1002628 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 96.50 308375 1002626 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 949.00 308376 1002629 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,233.00 308474 1002623 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,141.04 308475 1002624 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,455.59 308476 1002621 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,897.00 308477 1002625 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,069.81 308568 1002622 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,919.55 308559 1003820 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 17,535.41 368699 212112013 117685 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 115.84 CARTRIDGES 308312 8024451986 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 115.84 368700 2/2112013 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 360.00 JOB ADVERTISING 308265 1009543306 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 360.00 368701 212112013 117657 STORE TO DOOR 4,700.00 2013 SERVICES 308266 01108832 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 4,700.00 366702 212112013 101015 STREICHERS 39.51 GUN CLEANING SUPPLIES 00003147 308267 1996923 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.51 368703 212112013 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2120 /2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 20 2/21/2013 -2/21 12013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 527.19 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005969 308531 624273 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 527.19 368704 2/2112013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 123.41 AD FOR BID - 308268 1422566 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 123.41 AD FOR BID 308269 1422565 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 97.43 PUBLISH NOTICE 308270 1422564 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 129.90 AD FOR BID 308271 1422563 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 280.50 HELP SHAPE AD 308313 1421506 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 754.65 368705 212112013 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,258.00 308478 010204 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 698.00 308570 010330 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,956.00 368706 212112013 102471 THOLEN, BRIAN 257.29 UNIFORM PURCHASE 308593 021513 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 257.29 368707 2/2112013 129815 THOMAS REPROGRAPHICS 236.01 DRY ERASE LAMINATING SQUARES00001620 308532 0526709 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 236.01 368708 2/21/2013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 87.95 308377 736947 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,787.45 308378 736946 5662.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,875.40 368709 212112013 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 129.00 BOARD MEETING MINUTES 308533 M19576 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 129.00 368710 212112013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 30.17 WELDING GAS 308272 455512 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 688.86 WELDING GAS, HELMET 00005998 308273 125338 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.04 WELDING TANKS 308424 455513 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 35.62 GAS CYLINDER 00001602 308534 122982 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 796.69 368711 2/21/2013 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 448.80 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAM 308338 102017342 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) Subledger Account Description GENERALSUPPLIES 2/2012013 7:43:45 Page - 21 Business Unit 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 212112013 - 212112013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 448.80 368712 212112013 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 406.13 DOOR CLOSERS 00001593 308535 559711 4090.6406 406.13 368713 212112013 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 308274 FEB 2013 1500.6103 17.90 368714 212112013 125032 UNI- SELECT USA 1,601.14 AUTO PARTS 308314 013113 1553.6530 1,601.14 368715 212112013 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 182.80 PAGERS 308275 W0319246B 1400.6151 182.80 368716 2/2112013 119476 USPCA REGION 18 100.00 K9 TRIALS 308276 021113 1400.6104 100.00 368717 212112013 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 750.00 BROCHURE DESIGN 308339 2013 -1 1629.6575 750.00 368718 212112013 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 17,153.44 NEW EZ -GO UTILITY VEHICLES 00006114 308594 13013002 5400.1740 17,153.44 368719 212112013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 501.12 CAR WASH PARTS 00001634 308277 7048279 1552.6406 116.78 SIGN CLIPS 308595 7011741 5840.6406 617.90 368720 212112013 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 25.00 SAFETY GLASSSES 00005912 308278 316431 1646.6610 25.00 SAFETY GLASSSES 00005912 308278 316431 1553.6610 33.91 SAFETY GLASSSES 00005912 308278 316431 5913.6610 33.91 SAFETY GLASSSES 00005912 308278 316431 1301.6610 117.82 Subledger Account Description GENERALSUPPLIES 2/2012013 7:43:45 Page - 21 Business Unit 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 RECYCLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CITY OF EDINA MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH Council Check Register 2121/2013 — 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368721 212112013 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 486.35 CONCESSION PRODUCT 308279 35790606 5520.5510 486.35 368722 212112013 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 508.19 BULBS 00001489 308425 15216613 -01 5761.6530 508.19 368723 2/2112013 131688 WALDEN, JOHN 1,274.13 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND - 308340 ACCT 0200476001 5900.2015 1,274.13 368724 212112013 129629 WALWARK, SARAH 18.00 SUPER SUNDAY REFUND 308426 021413 1600.4390.15 18.00 368725 212112013 122059 WASHINGTON COUNTY FINANCIAL SE 2,859.43 INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS 308315 74482 1400.6103 2,859.43 368726 2/2112013 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 1,196.32 LEAK LOCATES 00001672 308316 3725 5913.6103 1,196.32 368727 212112013 104681 WEBB, DONNA 40.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 308427 8- FEB -13 5110.6564 40.00 368728 212112013 102020 WELLS, GARY 12.74 ZIP LOCK BAGS 308317 REIMBURSE 1301.6406 12.74 368729 212112013 124942 WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSI 68,575.00 CDBG FUNDS 308536 5032 BEDFORD 2127.6103 68,575.00 368730 212112013 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI 6.78 JAN 2013 MILEAGE 308341 013113 5952.6107 66.67 JAN 2013 MILEAGE 308341 013113 1490.6107 27.75 DEC 2012 MILEAGE 308394 021413 5952.6107 66.60 DEC 2012 MILEAGE 308394 021413 1490.6107 167.80 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD REPAIR PARTS CUSTOMER REFUND GEN ADAPTIVE REC 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Page - 22 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BILK GRANT MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:43:45 Council Check Register Page - 23 2121/2013 - 2121/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368731 212112013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 874.85 308379 32245400 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,155.87 308479 322315 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,086.85 308480 322317 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,117.57 368732 212112013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 987.39 308380 443763 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 859.82 308381 443760 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,012.32 308382 443827 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .56 308571 443758 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,026.08 308572 443762 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 89.12 308573 443828 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 979.28 308574 443759 5622.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,954.57 368733 212112013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 339.45 308383 1080001763 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,955.15 308384 1080002876 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 25.21 308385 1080002878 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,156.25 308386 1080002877 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 108.00 308387 1080002875 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,016.55 308387 1080002875 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11,747.83 308481 1080002882 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 39.54 308482 1080002934 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,903.66 308483 1080002883 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,290.07 308484 1080002879 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 565.20 308485 1080002880 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 26.88 308486 1080002881 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 783.74 308575 . 1080004313 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,421.15 308576 1080004312 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 25,378.68 368734 2121/2013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,272.00 308388 1090002273 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,996.25 308487 1090003030 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 308488 1090003052 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 127.50 308489 1090003051 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 667.10 308577 1090005017 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 352.00 308578 1090005019 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,696.90 308579 1090005018 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/21/2013 — 2/21/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 7,133.25 368735 212112013 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 719.38 HELMETS 00003559 308342 E1046605 421470.6710 719.38 368736 2/2112013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 6,419.17 51- 5888961 -7 308280 356704687 1375.6185 905.07 51- 4197645 -8 308281 356872557 1322.6185 6,185.09 51 -6121102 -5 308282 356887517 1646.6185 17,630.21 51- 5605640 -1 308428 357417116 5911.6185 31,139.54 366737 212112013 101091 23EGLER INC 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 308318 E6395947 1551.6180 177,412.50 WEILER P355 PAVER 00004018 308395 K4114801 421305.6710 177,862.50 2120/2013 7:43:45 Page - 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 1,230,715.07 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,230,715.07 Total Payments 1,230,715.07 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 403,490.14 02100 CDBG FUND 68,575.00 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 206.46 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 17,465.65 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 179,706.68 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,686.38 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 45.96 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 22,419.43 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 28,874.50 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 19,112.41 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 17,198.60 05800 LIQUOR FUND 177,571.61 05900 UTILITY FUND 253,195.80 05950 RECYCLING FUND 34,862.58 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,697.62 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 500.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,106.25 Report Totals 1,230,715.07 CITY OF EDINA 2/20/2013 7:45:21 Council Check Summary Page - 1 2121/2013 - 2/21/2013 Ar. We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poliglas apd procedures date R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 - 2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 368738 212812013 130958 24 RESTORE 602.23 CHEMICALCLEANUP 00001762 309172 13- 0173 -B 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSES & PERMITS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2127/2013 7:46:34 Page- 1 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PLANNING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 602.23 368739 212812013 100613 AAA 33.00 LICENSE TABS 309278 022213 1553.6260 33.00 368740 212812013 127125 AAKER, KRIS 72.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 308963 022013 1140.6107 72.21 368741 212812013 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 28.92 NIPPLES 00005040 309074 1- 847025 1553.6530 28.92 368742 212812013 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 733.59 UB TEMP 308609 37299560 5910.6103 733.59 368743 212812013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 58.00 309126 1656525 5842.5515 69.20 309127 1656520 5862.5515 .80- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 309295 1000007155 5842.5515 126.40 368744 212812013 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 104.22 ALARM SERVICE 309173 90336916 5111.6250 104.22 368745 212812013 103285 AMEM 200.00 DUES 308988 022013 1470.6105 200.00 368746 212812013 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 40.61 DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID 00005041 309075 AFS- 230500003 1553.6530 40.61 368747 2/28/2013 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 600.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 308610 021913 1400.6203 600.00 LICENSES & PERMITS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2127/2013 7:46:34 Page- 1 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PLANNING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2128/2013 - 2/2812013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368748 212812013 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 154.20 COFFEE 308611 1059924 7411.6406 305.24 COFFEE 309076 1056397 1550.6406 459.44 368749 212812013 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 25.93 IPAD DATA SERVICE 309174 287240706569X02 1130.6160 1713 25.93 368750 212812013 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON 1 181.63 ALTERNATOR 00005007 309077 152831 1553.6530 181.63 368751 212812013 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 220.00 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 308612 3871 1400.6215 220.00 368752 2/2812013 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 1,039.57 ICE SKATES 00002307 309175 00093038 5761.6406 1,039.57 368763 2/2812013 120517 BEITEL, DAWN 25.42 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 308613 2013 1624.6107 31.63 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309296 123112 1624.6107 57.05 368754 212812013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 529.05 309009 76922900 5822.5512 159.20 309128 77091100 5842.5513 173.68 309129 88040500 5822.5515 20.64 309130 88040400 5862.5515 108.70 309131 6288100 5862.5515 33.15 309132 88040300 5860.6406 195.23 309231 77091400 5822.5512 180.02 309232 88040200 5842.5515 1,399.67 368755 2/2812013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 114.11 FOLDERS 309078 WO- 832293 -1 1550.6406 66.24 INTEROFFICE ENVELOPES 309079 WO- 832627 -1 1550.6406 180.35 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING REPAIR PARTS 2/2712013 7:46:34 Page- 2 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PLAYGROUND & THEATER PLAYGROUND & THEATER COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR _ 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 2128/2013 —2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368766 212812013 101376 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 22.75 KEYS 00006191 309176 381035 5422.6406 22.75 368757 212812013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 37.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 309080 84275 1552.6406 37.24 368758 2/2812013 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC- 117.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003558 308990 80996471 1470.6510 60.75- CREDITONACCOUNT 308991 70106183 1470.6510 2,913.06 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003558 308992 80996470 1470.6510 150.72 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003558 308993 81000536 1470.6510 3,120.93 368759 2/2812013 120754 BOWER, LEAH 385.00 BLUE CARD TRAINING 308994 REGISTRATION 1470.61 D4 385.00 368760 2/2812013 131594 BOWMAC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN 15,331.12 SIMULATION -BASED TRAINING 308614 1493 7410.6218 15,331.12 368761 2128/2013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 48.34 FLOOR MAT 00005039 309081 716083 1553.6530 209.49 HEATER CORE 00005015 309082 717085 1553.6530 257.83 368762 2128/2013 101752 BRISCOE, ROBERT 200.00 POTTERY WORKSHOP 308615 021913 5110.6103 200.00 368763 212812013 102911 BROOKS, JOHN 385.00 BLUE CARD TRAINING 308989 REGISTRATION 1470.6104 385.00 368764 212812013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO - 75.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 309258 022513 1550.6103 75.00 368765 2/2812013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Council Check Register Page - 4 2/28/2013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 77.35 309010 242401 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,220.60 309011 242402 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17.20 309012 242403 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 712.65 309013 00010441 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,027.80 368766 2128/2013 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 672.00 309014 95317 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 672.00 368767 2128/2013 129923 CAWLEY 15.03 NAMEBADGES 309177 V146451 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 15.03 368768 212812013 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 151.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 309178 70866 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 151.00 368769 212812013 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 150.00 CPR RECERTIFICATION 309224 00493898 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 368770 2/2812013 123898 CENTURYLINK 59.32 952 944 -6522 308616 6522 -2/13 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 59.32 368771 212812013 100683 CHEMSEARCH 717.79 WATER TREATMENT CONTRACT 308617 999043 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 717.79 368772 212812013 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 420.62 00105263- 0335037016 308964 335037016 -2/13 5430.6189 SEWER & WATER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5,165.60 00103426 - 0345052006 308965 345052006 -2/13 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 317.69 00113607 - 0342163045 308995 342163045 -2/13 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 46.58 00086676- 0330288022 309179 330288022 -2/13 5310.6189 SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION 5,950.49 368773 2128/2013 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 246.79 XCEL BILLING - JAN 2013 00001678 308966 5524 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 246.79 368774 212812013 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. CITY OF EDINA 212712013 7:46:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 2128/2013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 204.00 COCOA 00002306 309182 0741772 -IN 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 204.00 368775 212812013 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 2,816.96 ELECTRIC SAW, CONCRETE SAW 00003588 309225 87893 421480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,816.96 368776 2/2812013 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 649.93 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009229 309180 INV000074801 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 81.18 REPLACEMENT BELT, RELAYS 00009236 309181 INV000075258 . 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 731.11 368777 2128/2013 131636 CROCS INC. 754.61 GOLF SHOES 00006082 308967 1959450RI 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 754.61 368778 2128/2013 130171 CTM SERVICES INC. 108.40 EDGER BLADES 00001708 309083 2702 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 108.40 368779 212812013 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 20.48 114 - 09855685 -4 WATER 308618 013113 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 20.48 368780 212812013 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 74.03 MERCHANDISE 00006088 308968 92303362 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.03 368781 212812013 104020 DALCO 204.84 DISINFECTANT, TOWELS 00001454 309084 2570150 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 204.84 368782 2128/2013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 619.95 309015 689249 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19.20 309016 689247 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,611.55 309017 689248 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 22.40 309018 689245 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,626.60 309019 689246 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,899.70 368783 212812013 101667 DEHN, BRUCE 223.89 UNIFORM PURCHASE 309085 022013 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 825.00 REAL ESTATE CONSULTING 309184 CITY OF EDINA 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 825.00 Council Check Register 368787 212812013 2/28/2013 - 2128/2013 123162 DISH Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 8255 7070 8142 2839 308619 020413 19.00 DRIVERS LICENSE UPGRADE 309183 022213 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 57.74 242.89 368788 368784 2/2812013 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 75.88 SOCKET 00005004 309086 769223 1553.6556 TOOLS PLAYGROUND & THEATER 43.00 SOCKET 00005004 309087 769810 1553.6556 TOOLS 118.88 212812013 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 368785 212812013 101986 DIBBLE, DON 899.41 MERCHANDISE 00006054 308969 491468 5440.5511 72.62 UNIFORM PURCHASE 309088 022013 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 72.62 368790 212812013 368786 2128/2013 131642 DIEHL AND PARTNERS LLC 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 6 Business Unit TRAINING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE 825.00 REAL ESTATE CONSULTING 309184 1132 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 825.00 368787 212812013 123162 DISH 57.74 8255 7070 8142 2839 308619 020413 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 57.74 368788 212812013 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 393.13 POSTCARDS AND MAILING 309297 5178 -01 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 393.13 368789 212812013 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 899.41 MERCHANDISE 00006054 308969 491468 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 899.41 368790 212812013 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 163.06 JAN 2013 WASHES 308620 5372 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 163.06 368791 2/2812013 131647 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS LACROSS 50.00 BANQUET CANCELLATION REFUND 309259 JUNE 2, 2013 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 50.00 368792 2/2812013 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 112.98 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003871 308996 1531486 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 112.98 368793 212812013 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 2,096.00 EXPLORER CONFERENCE 309185 021113 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM CITY OF EDINA 2127/2013 7:46:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 2/28/2013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,096.00 368794 2/2812013 124245 FARMER BROS. CO. 477.36 COFFEE 309298 57249752 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 477.36 368795 212812013 116492 FINANCE AND cOMMERCE 199.06 AD FOR BID 308621 10230340 1120.6120. ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 199:06 -368796 212812013 129500.. FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 104.00 309020 5983 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 104.00 368797 212812013 130699 FLEETPRIDE 543.11 MULTIFASTER KITS 00005739 309089 52058602 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT! OPERATION GEN 249.72 ERROR 309090 50883826 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 249.72- CORRECT ERROR 309091 50903701 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS = EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 543.11 368798. 212812013 104446 FORE/ RESERVATIONS INC. 2,589.38 RESERVATIONS SOFTWARE RENEWAL 308970 49980 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 874.06 RESERVATIONS SOFTWARE RENEV68006445 309186 60750 5430.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 3,463.44 368799 2/2812013 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 309187 1006357848 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 309188 1006380083 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 30.00 368800 2/2812013 103029 GALETON :. 699.75 ''GLOVES 00035555 309226 1086927 -00 _ 421480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPS FIRE EQUIPMENT 699.75 368801 212812013 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN 118.00 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00006064 309279 41257 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 785.00 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00008062 309280 41256 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 588.24 COOLING TOWER REPAIR 00008063 309281 41278 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 904.19 FINAL REPAIRS - 00008056 309282 41360 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS - ARENA ICE MAINT 2,395.43 368802 2128/2013 101662 GCSAA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Council Check Register Page - 8 2/28/2013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 170.00 MEMBERSHIP- BRYAN SANFORD 308971 302444 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 170.00 368803 212812013 131643 GENERATOR SYSTEM SERVICES INC. 490.00 UNIT REPAIRS 309092 6853 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 490.00 368804 212812013 130052 GLOWSHOT TARGETS LLC 268.20 TARGETS 308622 213 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 268.20 368805 212812013 130461 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC. 13,150.00 NEOGOV LICENSE/SUBSCRIPTION 308623 07 -9043 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 13,150.00 368806 212812013 101103 GRAINGER 484.08 HAZARDOUS WASTE BARREL 00001689 308624 9058199879 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 33.26 SAFETY GLASSES 00001690 308625 9059322611 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 67.26 SAFETY GLASSES 00001690 308625 9059322611 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.30 SAFETY GLASSES 00001690 308625 9059322611 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 106.21 HAZARDOUS WASTE LABELS 308626 9058904716 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 49.12 PIPE THREAD DIE 00001695 309093 9061455870 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.78 LENSE CLEANING TISSUES 00001699 309094 9062488649 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.68 SAFETY GLASSES 00005920 309095 9063020540 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.42 SAFETY GLASSES 00005920 309096 9062488656 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 251.21 PAPER PLATES 00005920 309096 9062488656 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 296.33 FLASHLIGHTS 00001675 309097 9066137804 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 234.48 GLOVES, LUBRICANTS 00001709 309098 9068461756 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 273.17- CREDIT 00005908 309099 9063145818 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 546.35- CREDIT 00005908 309100 9062216263 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.80 PAINT HARDENER 00006190 309189 9057629801 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 7.84 OUTLET POWER STRIP 00006134 309190 9058959181 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 59.86 PAINT HARDENER 00006192 309191 9062216255 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 955.11 368807 2/28/2013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 356.50 309021 149357 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 573.00 309233 149358 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 929.50 368808 212912013 129129 HABITAT WOODCRAFT INC. 375.00 REFINISH FLOORING 308627 020513 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE R55CKREG LOG20006 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 —2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CLASS REGISTRATION LAUNDRY POSTAGE BOARD & ROOM PRISONER DOG LICENSES GENERALSUPPLIES 2127/2013 7:46:34 Page- 9 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 375.00 368809 2128/2013 131626 HAHN, STEVEN 34.00 CLASS REFUND 308805 021913 5101.4607 34.00 368810 2128/2013 102967 HALSTEAD, TODD 200.27 UNIFORM PURCHASE 309101 021913 1553.6201 200.27 368811 212812013 101255 HASLER INC. 318.61 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 308628' 16718479 1550.6235 318.61 368812 212812013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,409.75 JAN 2013 ROOM & BOARD 308629 1000024945 1195.6225 1,409.75 368813 212812013 131646 HINES, PAT11 20.00 DUPLICATE REGISTRATION REFUND 309260 DOG LICENSE 1400.4120 20.00 368814 212812013 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 72.30 PAINT 308972 03043956 5410.6406 72.30 368815 212812013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,045.09 309022 636404 5842.5514 371.00 309023 636181 5822.5514 707.00 309024 636179 5862.5514 2,123.09 368816 212812013 103214 HOOTEN CLEANERS 135.75 LAUNDRY 309299 123112 1400.6201 135.75 368817 2/2812013 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND CONCERT BAND 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 3/3/13 309192 022213 5710.6136 150.00 368818 212812013 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 4,257.00 CRIME POLICY RENEWAL 309193 146117 1550.620C CLASS REGISTRATION LAUNDRY POSTAGE BOARD & ROOM PRISONER DOG LICENSES GENERALSUPPLIES 2127/2013 7:46:34 Page- 9 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,575.00 PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND 309194 146129 1550:6200 1,575.00 PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND 309195 146131 1550.6200 5520.5510 5842.5514 5913.6260 421470.6710 5822.5515 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5514 5862.5514 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 Subledger Account Description INSURANCE INSURANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2127/2013 7:46:34 Page - 10 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,407.00 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 368819 2/2812013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 202.84 CONCESSION PRODUCT 308630 2037711 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 202.84 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 368820 212812013 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 450.00 309234 11115 450.00 368821 212812013 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 32.00 REIMBURSE EXAM FEE 309196 022213 32.00 368822 2/2812013 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 295.40 BOOTS 00003559 308997 194023 295.40 368823 212812013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 21.50 309025 2029379 72.00 309133 2029389 39.05 309134 2029388 3,656.30 309135 2029387 2,120.91 309235 2029378 4,029.85 309236 2029370 9,939.61 368825 2128/2013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,542.61 309026 1507006 842.30 309027 1507010 51.12 309028 1507008 3,512.80 309029 1507004 2,150.00 309030 1503484 1.00- 309031 565083 75.22- 309032 565997 73.35 CREDIT USED TWICE 309136 556463CORR 12.23- CREDIT 309137 559478 62.03- CREDIT 309138 556462 34.22 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 309139 564752CORR 2,065.96 309140 1506998 5520.5510 5842.5514 5913.6260 421470.6710 5822.5515 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5514 5862.5514 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 Subledger Account Description INSURANCE INSURANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD 2127/2013 7:46:34 Page - 10 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check# Date 368826 2128/2013 Amount Supplier / Explanation 768.00 97.12 31.37 168.46 297.18 1,041.56 2,317.14 2,094.90 8,158.55 35.37 121.12 6,844.12 4,461.36 4,137.92 1,451.59 421.15 2.76 - 14.70- 1,945.26 364.48 573.88 48,144.25 131434 JOHNSON, ALEC 202.35 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 202.35 309197 022313 1622.6107 368827 212812013 131439 KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL LLP 1,237.50 AIRPORT FLIGHT TRACKING 309102 13636 1120.6103 1,237.50 368828 2/2812013 111018 KEEPRS INC. 137.67 UNIFORMS 00003529 308998 202230 -02 1470.6558 137.67 368829 2/2812013 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 75.08 PETTY CASH 309198 021913 5760.6406 129.81 PETTY CASH 309198 021913 5761.6406 204.89 368830 212812013 131629 KRAJESKI, JUDY Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT UNIFORMS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 11 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ,VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING SKATING & HOCKEY ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2128/2013 -2/28/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 309141 1502387 5842.5513 309142 1508283 5842.5513 309143 1506990 5822.5512 309144 1506994 5822.5512 309145 1506992 5822.5512 309146 1506989 5822.5512 309147 1507005 5862.5513 309148 1507009 5862.5513 309149 1507003 5862.5513 309150 1507007 5862.5515 309151 1506987 5842.5513 309152 1506997 5842.5513 309153 1506999 5842.5513 309154 1507001 5842.5513 309155 1507000 5842.5512 309156 1507002 5842.5512 309157 566537 5842.5513 309158 566539 5842.5513 309237 1506993 5822.5513 309238 1508284 5862.5512 309239 1506991 5822.5513 309240 1506988 5822.5513 309197 022313 1622.6107 368827 212812013 131439 KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL LLP 1,237.50 AIRPORT FLIGHT TRACKING 309102 13636 1120.6103 1,237.50 368828 2/2812013 111018 KEEPRS INC. 137.67 UNIFORMS 00003529 308998 202230 -02 1470.6558 137.67 368829 2/2812013 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 75.08 PETTY CASH 309198 021913 5760.6406 129.81 PETTY CASH 309198 021913 5761.6406 204.89 368830 212812013 131629 KRAJESKI, JUDY Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT UNIFORMS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 11 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ,VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING SKATING & HOCKEY ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 — 2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 185.00 CLASS REFUND 308806 021913 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CLASS REGISTRATION GENERALSUPPLIES 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES SKATING & HOCKEY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS 185.00 368831 2/2812013 128326 LANG, USA 152.92 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309199 022013 1622.6107 152.92 368832 2/2812013 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 235.46 GLASS DOOR, REPAIRS 00005796 309200 255512 5761.6530 235.46 368833 212812013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 219.62 SCREWS, WASHERS 00005919 309103 9301428550 1325.6406 1,089.96 FITTINGS, WASHERS 00005918 309104 9301435526 1553.6530 1,309.58 368834 212812013 105726 UNDMAN, DAVID 303.15 COMPUTER MONITOR 309201 022213 1400.6406 303.15 368835 2/2812013 118816 LITWIN, KATHY 184.00 ART REGISTRATION REFUND 309202 022113 5101.4607 184.00 368836 212812013 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 163.29 COPIER USAGE 309105 1525568 1553.6406 163.29 368837 2128/2013 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 5,500.00 2012 AUDIT 309294 32499 1160.6130 5,500.00 368838 212812013 122564 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 175.23 OXYGEN 00003649 308999 06382705 1470.6510 171.00 OXYGEN 00003649 309000 06403372 1470.6510 346.23 368839 212812013 101146 MATRIX 313.56 309227 608087571 1554.6188 313.56 368840 212812013 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CLASS REGISTRATION GENERALSUPPLIES 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES SKATING & HOCKEY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 -2128/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 12,366.00 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 309203 0071343 -IN 1554.6230 12,366.00 368841 2/2812013 118096 M -B COMPANIES INC 2,067.27 REPAIR KITS, GASKETS 00005955 309106 171549 1553.6585 2,067.27 368842 212812013 124708 MCLEOD, DOUGLAS 200.00 EMT REFRESHER 309001 022013 1470.6104 200.00 368843 2128/2013 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 37.29 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309283 022513 1240.6107 37.29 368844 212812013 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC. 2,029.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003585 309002 22248 1470.6510 2,029.90 368845 212812013 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,827.50 [MAX TRIP 2/21/13 308631 021413 1628.6103.07 1,827.50 368846 212812013 101483 MENARDS 85.13 STARTER KITS, TOW HITCHES 00006368 309204 17905 5422.6406 113.06 POST MOUNTS, ROLLERS 00001681 309284 16906 1318.6406 34.94 LUMBER, NEOPRENE 00001685 309285 16939 1318.6406 94.69 BUILDING SUPPLIES 00008061 309286 17477 5511.6406 16.00 STRAIGHT TINNER 00008059 309287 17478 5511.6406 104.49 LUMBER, TAPE, SCREWS 00008060 309288 17558 5511.6406 126.45 GYPSUM 00008058 309289 17999 5511.6406 56.71 BUILDING SUPPLIES 00008057 309290 18006 5511.6406 631.47 368847 2128/2013 100885 METRO SALES INC 2,794.36 COPIER USAGE 00003006 308632 501638 1400.6230 142.68 COPIER USAGE 309205 500877 5110.6151 2,937.04 368848 2/2812013 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 308973 4292 4077.6103 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 309261 4275 4077.6103 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 13 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINAATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINAATHLETIC ASSOCIATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 114.00 OFFICIATING FEES 309262 4300 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAC CHARGES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 14 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INSPECTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLASS REGISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PERSONNEL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 399.00 368849 212812013 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 2,638.90 JAN 2013 SAC 308974 021913 1495.4307 2,638.90 368850 2/2812013 101471 MGCSA 520.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES (4) 308975 2013 5410.6105 520.00 368851 212812013 130914 MICKELSON, DAVID 150.00 CLASS REIMBURSEMENT 309206 CONTINUING ED 1495.6104 150.00 368852 212812013 104650 MICRO CENTER 144.26 HARD DRIVE 308810 4312451 1130.6406 37.40- RETURN 308811 4315710 1130.6406 106.86 368853 212812013 131634 MINKLER MARYCH, DENISE 386.00 CLASS REFUND 308807 021913 5101.4607 386.00 368854 212812013 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 98.00 HAND SOAP 00001499 309107 SOI -010547 1552.6511 98.00 368855 212812013 120012 MINNESOTA CHAPTER OF APA 25.00 JOB LISTING 308977 2013 1550.6121 25.00 368856 212812013 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 300.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 308976 BRUCE DEHN 5919.6104 300.00 368857 2/2812013 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 41.10 GASKETS 00005913 309109 0097311 -IN 1553.6530 41.10 368858 2128/2013 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS 75.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT 309110 REI PERMIT -2013 5511.6136 SAC CHARGES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 14 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INSPECTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLASS REGISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES ADVERTISING PERSONNEL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/2712013 7:46:34 Council Check Register Page - 15 2/28/2013 - 2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 75.00 368859 2/28/2013 101796 MPCA 269.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 308633 2200090085 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 269.00 368860 212W2013 101796 MPCA 269.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE LICENSE 309106 2200069132 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 269.00 368861 212812013 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,200.00 MGAAD 309263 G281359 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,275.00 MGAAD 309264 G281383 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 3,475.00 368862 212812013 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 30.43 NUTS 00006369 309207 888282 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 579.78 GRINDER PARTS 00006366 309208 887773 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 610.21 368863 2/2812013 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHI 125.00 EDINA ART CENTER AD 309209 282420 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 125.00 368864 2/2812013 104350 NIKE USA INC. 34.63 SHIRT 308978 948024879 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 34.63 368865 212812013 106429 NISI, LAURA 81.00 CLASS REFUND 308808 021913 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 81.00 368866 2/2812013 130141 DENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 312.49 309241 1134 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 312.49 368867 212812013 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 372.90 JAN 2013 SERVICES 309111 W13010651 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.94 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 23.94 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 23.94 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.88 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 1,905.04 CITY OF EDINA 368868 2/2812013 Council Check Register 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 2128/2013 -2/28/2013 PEST CONTROL Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 47.88 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5913.6188 TELEPHONE 47.88 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 71.82 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 71.82 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 71.82 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 92.52 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 115.76 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 119.70 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 167.58 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5760.6188 TELEPHONE 167.58 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5710.6188 TELEPHONE 198.68 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 239.40 JAN 2013 SERVICE 309112 W13010645 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 1551.6180 5511.6180 5440.6406 7411.6511 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5822.5513 5822.5513 368873 212812013 100949 PDI NINTH HOUSE 1,500.00 PERFORMANCE REVIEW 309114 1101314249 1120.6103 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERALSUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2/2712013 7:46:34 Page- 16 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT YORK FIRE STATION YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY SKATING & HOCKEY CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PSTF OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ADMINISTRATION 1,905.04 368868 2/2812013 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 134.16 PEST CONTROL 309113 81874251 134.16 368869 212812013 104895 OVERHEAD DOOR CO. 194.45 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 308634 77559 194.45 368870 2128/2013 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC 169.62 DISPLAYS FOR PRO SHOP 00006149 309210 306354 169.62 368871 2/2812013 129485 PAPCO INC. 105.69 DISINFECTANT, LINERS, TOWELS 308635 76332 105.69 368872 2/2812013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,226.44 309033 8388497 -IN 424.68 309034 8388506 -IN 7.00- 309035 8388396 -CM 123.44 309036 8388394 -CM 33.25 309159 8388518 -IN 266.25 309242 8387822 -IN 197.25 309243 8388521 -IN 1551.6180 5511.6180 5440.6406 7411.6511 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5822.5513 5822.5513 368873 212812013 100949 PDI NINTH HOUSE 1,500.00 PERFORMANCE REVIEW 309114 1101314249 1120.6103 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERALSUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2/2712013 7:46:34 Page- 16 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT YORK FIRE STATION YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY SKATING & HOCKEY CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PSTF OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 5520.5510 1470.6104 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5514 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5440.5511 5720.6180 1553.6583 2127/2013 7:46:34 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 368874 2/2812013 VERNON SELLING 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,005.73 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 308636 09421557 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,005.73 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 368875 212812013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 124709 PETRELLA, ADAM 200.00 EMT REFRESHER 309003 022013 200.00 368876 2/2812013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,742.28 309037 2381491 2,607.89 309038 2381492 .56 309039 2381482 395.20 309040 2381483 1,387.71 309041 2381493 91,12 309160 2381485 1,179.20 309161 2382224 3,589.22 309162 2381488 748.16 309163 2381481 1,309.24 309164 2381490 2,060.84 309165 2381489 1.12 309166 2381480 70.00 309244 2381484 122.24 309245 2381486 1,075.82 309246 2381478 1,052.32 309247 2382225 17,432.92 368877 212812013 100119 PING 1,575.94 GOLF CLUBS 308979 11629694 1,575.94 368878 212812013 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,276.44 PLANT MAINTENANCE 309211 315151 2,276.44 368879 212812013 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 75.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005633 309300 210024951 75.00 368880 2/2812013 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 5520.5510 1470.6104 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5514 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5440.5511 5720.6180 1553.6583 2127/2013 7:46:34 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS TIRES & TUBES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 - 2128/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2.150.00 ART CENTER POSTAGE 309212 022213 5110.6235 POSTAGE 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 18 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2.150.00 368881 2/2812013 118956 QUINN, RYAN 385.00 BLUE CARD TRAINING 309228 REGISTRATION 1470.6104 FEE 385.00 368882 212812013 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 232.98 BEARINGS 00006364 309213 CD1644463 5422.6530 232.98 368883 2/2812013 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 145.50 REPAIR PIPE LEAK 00001656 308980 15372 5913.6160 145.50 368884 212812013 125936 REINDERS INC. 435.28 SALT FOR ICE MELT 00001702 309115 3019190 -00 1647.6406 435.28 368885 212812013 100978 RIEDELL SHOES INC. 214.25 RENTAL SKATES 00008046 308637 54561714 5511.6406 214.25 368886 212812013 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 619.90 SOFTENER SALT 00008048 308638 00280118 5511.6406 91.70 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 309004 00280067 1470.6406 711.60 368887 212812013 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 246.18 PAINT DISPOSAL 309214 60099218 5422.6182 246.18 368888 2/2812013 117807 SAM'S CLUB 328.64 ARCADE / KITCHEN SUPPLIES 308639 3576.4666 7411.6406 328.64 368889 212812013 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 309229 INV- 10141 -2013 1470.6160 733.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 309230 INV 10218 -2013 1470.6160 783.00 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 18 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 2/27/2013 7:46:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 2/28/2013 - 2/28/2013 Check # Date. Amount Supplier / _Explanation , PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 368890 212812013- 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 26.65 ARTWORK SOLD 308640 021913 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.65 368891 212612013 103836 SCHEERER, DANIEL 300.00 PAINTING 309005 FIRE STATION 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL . 300.00 368892 212812013 127049 SCHNEIDER; KATHERINE 240.00 FITNESS TRAINING 309006 021813 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 368893%- 212812013 100995 SEH 70,287.34 NORMANDALE STREET RECON 309215 265416 01394.1705.20 CONSULTINGDESIGN NORMANDALE 70,287.34 368894 212812013 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 42.39 PAINT, TRAY LINERS 00001684 309116 " 9980-0. 1325.6532 PAINT - -- STREET NAME SIGNS 42.39 368895 2/2812013 120302 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 22.43 PAINT, BRUSH 00001629 309117 9068 -3 1325.6532 PAINT STREET NAME SIGNS 22.43 368896 212812013 120784 SIGN PRO 158.18. SIGNS 308641 6417 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 158.18 368897 212812013 = -- 131645 SMITH, HAROLD 150.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 309216- 5914 OLINGER RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 150:00 368898 212812013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS - 2,380.97 309042 1004798 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR . YORK SELLING 4,750.50 309043 1004797 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,341.64 309044 1004795 5822.5513 COST-OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,258.80 309045 1004796 _ 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 397.00 309046 1004800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE, VERNON SELLING 7,635.00 309047 1004801 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING " 3,018.66 309048 1004802 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS -SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 400.00 309167 1005993 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .. 306.50 309248 1005994 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Council Check Register Page - 20 2/28/2013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 47.00- 309275 2011755 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 624.00- 309276 2011754 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 529.00- 309277 2011756 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 21,289.07 368899 212812013 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 467.80 SCADA PROGRAMMING 308981 1254 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,700.00 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00001843 308982 1255 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,167.80 368900 2/2812013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 124.70 PIPE/FITTINGS 00001711 308983 S2684739.001 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 124.70 368901 212812013 102371 STANDARD SPRING 620.50 REAR SPRING, U -BOLTS 00005042 309118 344039 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 620.50 368902 2/28/2013 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 317/13 309217 022213 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 368903 2/2812013 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 487.59 POLICE EXTERNALAP INSTALL 308642 16360 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 287.70 SQUAD LAPTOP ACCESS POINT 308643 16362 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 479.04 LOW VOLTAGE WIRING 309218 16361 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,254.33 368904 212812013 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 269.22 TIRES 00005013 309119 10115603 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 269.22 368905 2/28/2013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 45.47 PUBLISH NOTICE 308644 1423434 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 535.50 EDINA LIQUOR AD 309120 1422639 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 580.97 366906 212812013 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 42.73 380007460384 LISTING 309121 020413 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 42.73 380007460384 LISTING 309121 020413 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 42.74 380007460384 LISTING 309121 020413 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 128.20 CITY OF EDINA 2/27/2013 7:46:34 R55CKREG L6G20000 Council Check Register Page -.. 21 2/28/2013 -2128/2013 Check # Date Amount ? Supplier /Explanation P6# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368907 212812013 101171 SUPERIOR SHORES RESORT 500.00 WORKSHOP 309219 022213 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 500.00 368908 212812013 120998 SURLY BREWING CO.. 1,021.00 309049 010491 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1;248.00 309050 010415 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 750.00 309051 010459 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,248.00 309052 010414 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 936.00 309053 010413 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS.SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,203.00 366909. 2/2812013 101025 .TAMARACK MATERIALS INC. 57.93 EGG CRATE PANELS 00002290 309220 7105328 -00 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 57:93 368910 2128/2013 104932 TAYLOR MADE 99.17 STAFF SHIRTS 309265 19190693 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 574.01 GOLF BALLS 309266 19193989 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6,362.22- MERCHANDISE 309267 19174217 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 249.51 GOLF CLUBS 309268' 19174218 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 431.05 GOLF CLUBS 309269 19163026 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS'- PRO SHOP- PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 635.96 MERCHANDISE 309270 19183025 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 335.40 MERCHANDISE 309271 19169588 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP - PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES. . 987.37 ' GOLF BALLS 309272 19169586 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAILSALES 423.61 MERCHANDISE 309273 19169587 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS,- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 450.00- CREDIT 309274 19706574 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES - 4,121.76- CREDIT 309301 18700142 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,324.90= CREDIT 309302 18701034 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 273.30- CREDIT 309303 18736900 . 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES.. 617.40- CREDIT 309304 18753753 5440.5511 COST -OF GOODS = PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ' 2,316.94 - J 368911 2/2812013 131644 TERHOR ST, JOYCE 17.00.. SUPER SUNDAY REFUND 309221 FRANCIS 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 17.00 368912 212812013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 81.75 309054 738084 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _. VERNON SELLING 2,930.50 -. 309055 738083 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING . 3,012.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Council Check Register Page - 22 2/2812013 -2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368913 212812013 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 268.75 DRAFT COUNCIL MINUTES 215/13 308645 M19605 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 268.75 368914 2/2812013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 67.81 ARGON 00006367 309222 126652 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 67.81 368915 212812013 124763 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 175.92 COPIER USAGE 308646 221909609 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 175.92 368916 212812013 129105 TWIN SOURCE 49.38 CLEANING SOLUTION 309122 00430832 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 49.38 CLEANING SOLUTION 309122 00430832 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 98.77 CLEANING SOLUTION 309122 00430832 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 197.53 368917 212812013 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 3,686.18 UNIFORMS 308984 013113 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,686.18 368918 212812013 116991 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA VMC 179.20 K9 EXAM 308647 789305 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 179.20 368919 2/2812013 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 104.35 SHIP TRAFFIC TESTER 309123 TRAN: 9665 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 104.35 368920 212812013 119479 VALLEY VIEW GLASS & SCREEN 187.50 PLEXIGLASS 309305 091012 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 187,50 368921 2128/2013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 302.91 LIQUOR BAGS 309007 264451 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 302.91 368922 212812013 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 97.15 785950500 -00001 308985 2870221064 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 97.15 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 —2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368923 2128/2013 128680 VIDACARE CORPORATION 1,048.47 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003586 309008 70677 1470.6510 1,048.47 368924 2128/2013 119454 VINOCOPJA 740.00 309168 0072632 -IN 5842.5513 740.00 368925 212812013 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 414.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 308648 35870709 5520.5510 414.00 368926 212812013 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,250.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 308649 213001 1140.6103 2,250.00 368927 212812013 131635 WARNER, CHRISTINE 78.00 CLASS REFUND 308809 021913 5101.4607 78.00 368928 212812013 130574 WATSON COMPANY 218.05 CONCESSION PRODUCT 308650 822905 5520.5510 218.05 368929 212812013 101075 WEIGLE, SUE 168.43 VOLUNTEER LUNCHEON GIFTS 308651 021213 1628.6406 168.43 368930 212812013 131648 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. 3,926.43 VERNON AVE TRAFFIC STUDY 309291 1300322 1140,6103 3,926.43 368931 212812013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 978.15 309056 322998 -00 5842.5513 2,112.05 309057 323001 -00 5862.5513 911.55 309249 323007 -00 5822.5513 4,001.75 368932 2128/2013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS .56 309058 444653 5862.5513 1,347.56 309059 444656 5862.5513 2/2712013 7:46:34 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description Business Unit FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2127/2013 7:46:34 Council Check Register Page - 24 2/28/2013 -212812013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 676.07 309169 444718 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 309170 444652 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,735.19 309171 444655 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 648.96 309250 444651 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8,409.46 368933 2128/2013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 56.00 309060 1080005833 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 10,237.94 309060 1080005833 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,245.84 309061 1080005845 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,174.67 309062 1080005844 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 504.11 309063 1080005850 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,700.34 309064 1080005849 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,997.39 309065 1080005847 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 65.35- 309066 878529 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 551.10 309251 1080006943 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,912.45 309252 1080005846 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 29,314.49 368934 212812013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,490.00 309067 1090006054 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 112.00 309068 1090006055 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 309069 1090006056 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 43.00 309070 1090005016 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,259.00 309071 1090005307 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,198.30 309072 1090005015 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,803.00 309253 1090008058 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 21.50 309254 1090008142 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,353.85 309255 1090008060 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 139.50 309256 1090008141 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 112.00 309257 1090008059 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 11,553.65 ' 368935 212812013 112752 WPS MEDICARE PART B 397.72 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 308986 EUNICE JOHNSON 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 397.72 368936 212812013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 43.74 51- 5276505 -8 308987 357759713 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,530.75 51- 5619094 -8 309223 357416511 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5,301.66 51- 5619094 -8 309223 357416511 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 6,876.15 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2/28/2013 — 2/28/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 368937 2/2812013 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 19,831.80 UNLEADED FUEL 00005800 309124 541360 1553.6581 6,800.14 DIESEL FUEL 00005800 309125 541362 1553.6581 6,833.80 DIESEL FUEL 00005800 309292 541699 1553.6581 33,465.74 368938 2128/2013 120099 - Z WINES USA LLC 327.50 309073 11767 5842.5513 327.50 368939 212812013 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 214.07 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 308652 54069423 7411.6406 141.98 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 308653 54069425 5510.6610 356.05 368940 212812013 101091 ZIEGLER INC 843.79 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 309293 SW050194583 1553.6180 843.79 Subledger Account Description GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE 2/27/2013 7:46:34 Page - 25 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 445,223.57 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 445,223.57 Total Payments 445,223.57 PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 2/27/2013 7:48:06 Council Check Summary Page- 1 2128/2013 - 2/28/2013 Company Amount 01000 GENERALFUND 129,105.88 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 70,865.54 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,812.11 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,975.54 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 92.52 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 70.52 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 16,240.36 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 6,815.26 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 2,801.95 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,851.50 05800 LIQUOR FUND 179,936.49 05900 UTILITY FUND 10,177.84 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 246.79 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 17,406.27 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 825.00 Report Totals 445,223.57 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies a d procedu� ate ity \y CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 12/27/12-01/26/13 .Number Account Name Date Amount MCCG Description Merchant Name City State Account * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/01/08 $249.00 TRAINING NATL PUBLIC EMPLOYER LA 760- 433 -1686 CA 1170.6104 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/01/08 $175.00 MEMBERSHIP NATL PUBLIC EMPLOYER LA 760 - 433 -1686 CA 1170.6105 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/01/18 $125.00 ADVERTISING WISCONSIN PARK & RECRE 414 - 423 -1210 WI 1170.6120 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/01/22 $175.00 MEMBERSHIP NATL PUBLIC EMPLOYER LA 760- 433 -1686 CA 1170.6105 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/01/03 $26.81 IPAD CHARGER BESTBUY.COM 00009944 888 - 2378289 MN 1495.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/01/07 $20.00 DATA SERVICE VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/01/08 $42.90 ADAPTER MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL ST LOUIS PARK MN 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/01/09 $325.00 TRAINING HENNEPIN CTY MED CENTER 612 - 8739152 MN 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/01/11 $1,321.47 TRAINING MNSCU 877 - 4666728 MN 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/01/14 $190.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES B &N BOOKST MINN -ST -U #3739 507- 389 -1649 MN 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/01/15 $81.21 EATING /DRINKING SHAM ROCKS GRILL & PUB SAINT PAUL MN 1470.6106 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/01/22 $208.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTYSCHEERER 2013/01/24 $798.00 CLOTHING LANDS END BUS OUTFITTERS DODGEVILLE WI 1470.6558 * *0127 KAREN KURT 2013/01/07 $48.00 TRAINING SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITI 612 - 7207667. MN 1120.6104 * *0127 KAREN KURT 2013/01/09 $68.00 BOOKS APA - BOOKSTORE 312- 4319100 IL 1120.6406 * *0127 KAREN KURT 2013/01/15 $17.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1120.6406 * *0127 KAREN KURT 2013/01/16 $174.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1120.6406 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/01/14 $93.93 CELL PHONE SPRINT *WIRELESS 800 - 639 -6111 KS 1120.6188 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/01/16 $1,165.80 AIRFARE DELTA AIR 0062322456472 DELTA.COM CA 1130.6124 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/01/16 $1,165.80 AIRFARE DELTA AIR 0062322456473 DELTA.COM CA 1130.6124 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2012/12/28 $624.00 BOOKS BARNES & NOBLE #2514 EDINA MN 1504.6218 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/01/22 $197.09 FOOD PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/07 $35.00 CONFERENCE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 800 - 321 -5011 DC 1140.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/07 $45.00 CONFERENCE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 800 - 321 -5011 DC 1140.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/08 $218.42 FOOD PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/11 $19.95 TRANSACTION FEE PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -9770 CA 1550.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/11 $18.25 TRANSACTION FEE PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -9770 CA 1550.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/14 $45.00 MEHA CONFERENCE PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1490.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/14 $45.00 MEHA CONFERENCE PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1490.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/15 $240.00 TRAINING U OF M CCE NONCREDIT 612 - 625 -4259 MN 1495.6104 * *0176' JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/16 $50.00 RECERTIFICATION 123SIGNUP 877- 6919951 CA 1160.6105 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/16 $50.00 DUES AMERICAN PAYROLLASSOCIAT 210 - 2264600 TX 1160.6105 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 12/27/12-01/26/13 Number Account Name Date Amount MCCG Description Merchant Name City State Account * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/22 $48.00 CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITI 612 - 7207667 MN 1100.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/22 $94.41 ASHRAE 15 -2007 TECHSTREET 800- 699 -9277 MI 1495.6405 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/23 $35.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402 - 935 -7733 DC 1490.6105 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/01/23 $35.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402- 935 -7733 DC 1490.6105 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/01/05 $33.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN 1120.6406 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/01/16. $530.00 MCFOA CONFERENCE GTS EDUCATIONAL EVE 651 - 222 -7409 MN 1180.6104 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/01/17 $275.00 POSTAGE NEOPOST USA MILFORD CT 1550.6235 . * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/01/22 $48.00 TRAINING SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITI 612 - 7207667 MN 1100.6104 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2012/12/31 $96.00 MPLS /STP BUS JOURNAL CITY BUSINESS - MINNEAPOLIS 612 - 288 -2100 MN 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2012/12/31 $330.00 ANNUAL FEE APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888 - 7564624 IL 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON . 2013/01/08 $79.00 REGISTATION LBP *REALESTATECOMMGRP 312 - 416 -1860 IL 1190.6104 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/01/11 $80.00. MAAO MEMBERSHIP MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763 - 569 -3357 MN 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/01/12 $80.00 MAAO MEMBERSHIP MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763 -569 -3357 MN 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/01/12 $80.00 MAAO MEMBERSHIP MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763- 569 -3357 MN 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/01/12 $80.00 MAAO MEMBERSHIP MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763 -569 -3357 MN 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/01/12 $80.00 MAAO MEMBERSHIP MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763 - 569 -3357 MN 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/01/11 $375.00 CONT ED APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888- 7564624 IL 1190.6104 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/01/11 $44.00 PUBLICATION APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888 - 7564624 IL 1190.6406 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/01/16 $21.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL ST LOUIS PARK MN 1260.6406 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/01/23 $345.00 ENGINEERS CONFERENCE U OF M CCE NONCREDIT 612- 625 4259 MN 1260.6104 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2013/01/16 $345.00 ENGINEERS CONFERENCE U OF M CCE NONCREDIT 612 -625 -4259 MN 1281.6104 * *6973 GREG BRETSON 2013/01/03 $90.00 RECERTIFICATION DAKOTA TECH CUSTOM TRAINI 651 - 4238301 MN 1281.6104 * *6973 GREG BRETSON 2013/01/03 $95.00 RECERTIFICATION HTC CUSTOM TRAINING 952 - 9951300 MN 1281.6104 * *6973 GREG BRETSON 2013/01/04 $168.50 VEHICLE EXPENSE VCN *MN STATE PATROL 866 - 2551856 MN 1553.6585 * *6973 GREG BRETSON 2013/01/08 $95.00 RECERTIFICATION HTC CUSTOM TRAINING 952- 9951300 MN 1281.6104 * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER 2012/12/27 $605.00 TRAINING PENN FOSTER DOMESTIC 888 - 4271000 PA 1281.6104 * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER 2013/01/08 $25.62 SUPPLIES NORTHERN TOOL EQUIP MINNETONKA MN 1301.6406 * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER 2013/01/16 $69.71 PHONE HOLSTER SPRINT STORE #1558 EDINA MN 1301.6406 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2013/01/02 $118.80 RENEWAL DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 651 - 2845528 MN 1240.6105 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2013/01/17 $325.00 TRAINING POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 651 - 2967250 MN 5919.6104 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2013/01/18 $726.36 TUITION MNSCU 877 - 4666728 MN 5919.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/02 $685.00 REGISTATION NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFICE 800 - 279 -9127 PA 1400.6104 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 12/27/12-01/26/13 Number Account Name Date Amount MCCG Description Merchant Name City State Account * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/02 $685.00 REGISTATION NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFICE 800 - 279 -9127 PA 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/02 $320.00 MEMBERSHIP MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLIC 651 - 4570677 MN 1400.6105 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/02 $130.00 MEMBERSHIP MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLIC 651 - 4570677 MN 1400.6105 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/04 $20.00 TRAINING GLOCK PROFESSIONAL INC SMYRNA GA 1400.6405 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/04 $243.81 HOTELS HOLIDAY INNS DULUTH MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/07 $425.00 FTO BASIC CERTIFICATION ATOM 763- 545 -0064 MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/07 $425.00 FTO BASIC CERTIFICATION ATOM 763 - 545 -0064 MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/10 $117.46 PERMITS MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLIC 651 - 4570677 MN 1400.6406 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/15 $27.85 FLASH DRIVES MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL ST LOUIS PARK MN 1400.6406 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/16 $75.00 RENEWAL FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSO 703 - 6321990 VA 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/01/22 $75.00 RENEWAL FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSO 703 - 6321990 VA 1400.6104 * *5546 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2013/01/08 $28.61 FOOD DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *5546 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2013/01/18 $78.00 LEAGUE BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN PR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/01/10 $76.84 FOOD CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/01/10 ($25.00) FOOD CUB FOODS #3128 SSS EDINA MN .1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/01/11 $150.00 BOOK MINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOO 612 - 215 -2520 MN 1629.6406 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2013/01/11 $2.00 PARKING MPLS METERS MULTI MINNEAPOLIS MN 1600.6406 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/01/08 $125.00 WATERSHED CONF PAYPAL *FRESHWATERS 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1640.6104 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/01/08 $125.00 WATERSHED CONF PAYPAL *FRESHWATERS 402- 935 -7733 CA 1640.6104 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/01/09 $38.89 PHONE HOLSTER DISCOUNTCELL 801 - 235 -9809 UT 1646.6406 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/01/10 $569.28 TUITION DAKOTACTY TECH B US OFF ROSEMOUNT MN 1640.6104 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/01/09 ($1,452.72) TUITION REFUND MNSCU SAINT PAUL MN 1640.6104 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/01/14 $527.49 TOOLS NORTHERN TOOL EQUIP MINNETONKA MN 1648.6530 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/01/16 $180.00 TRAINING JRK SEED AND TURF SUPPLY 651 - 6866756 MN 1643.6104 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/01/23 $875.00 TREE RECERTIFICATION U OF M CCE NONCREDIT 612 - 625 -4259 MN 1644.6104 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/12/27 $20.00 DATA SERVICE VZWRLSS *PREPAID PYMNT 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/12/27 $316.71 PROJECTION SCREEN COMPUTER NERDS INTERNATIO 888 - 5666373 FL 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/12/27 $42.85 CASE FOR PROJ SCREEN B & H PHOTO- VIDEO.COM 800 - 9479950 NY 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/12/27 $178.95 TELEPROMPTER ACCESS. BODELIN 800- 441 -6877 OR 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/12/28 $5.00 SOFTWARE AKSMT.COM . 877- 273 -3049 CA 1130.6124 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/03 $119.78 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CINEQUIPT MINNEAPOLIS MN 1130.6103 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/05 $32.17 SOFTWARE ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 12/27/12-01/26/13 Number Account Name Date Amount MCCG Description Merchant Name City State Account * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/06 $32.17 SOFTWARE ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/07 $49.00 SOFTWARE CTO *GOTOMEETING.COM 800- 263 -6317 CA 1495.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/09 $381.10 COMPUTER SUPPLIES B & H PHOTO- VIDEO.COM 800 - 9479950 NY 1130.6407 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/10 $5.54 SUPPLIES JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/10 $54.99 BUSINESS EXPENS PAYPAL *MARIKANEUMA 402 - 935 =7733 CA 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/09 $74.02 WIRELESS MOUSE APPLE STORE #R054 EDINA MN 1130.6407 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/10 $23.80 SCREEN PROTECTORS AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1260.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/10 $23.80 SCREEN PROTECTORS AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 4204.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/13 $20.00 DATA SERVICE VZWRLSS *PRPAYAUTOPAY 888- 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2013/01/17 $20.00 DATA SERVICE VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2013/01/16 $35.28 PAPER ROLLS & RIBBONS PAPER ROLLS & RIBBONS 201 - 684 -1730 NJ 5510.6513 * *7838 DOUG BAUMAN 2012/12/26 $160.90 SHARK TARGET 00002204 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6511 * *7838 DOUG BAUMAN 2013/01/15 $189.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE DEPOT #415 EDEN PRARIE MN 5510.6513 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2013/01/14 $37.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL ST LOUIS PARK MN 5110/5125.( * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2013/01/22 $484.00 ADVERTISING NEMAA 612- 788 -1679 MN 5110.6122 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/12/28 $63.90 GENERAL SUPPLIES PALAY DISPLAY IND 952- 983 -2026 MN 5440.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/12/31 $9.64 GENERAL SUPPLIES PALAY DISPLAY IND 952 - 983 -2026 MN 5440.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/01/02 $144.75 GENERALSUPPLIES QUALITYFAB7702180117 770 - 2180117 GA 5420.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/01/04 $436.05 REPAIR PARTS ATTACHMENTS DIRECT LLC MO 320 - 7591551 MN 5422.6530 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/01/07 $377.65 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VINYLGUARD 781 - 569 -6710 MA 5422.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/01/17 $43.43 REPAIR PARTS ATTACHMENTS DIRECT LLC MO 320 - 7591551 MN 5422.6530 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/01/19 $76.80 OFFICE SERVICES FIRST SHRED 763 - 5373333 MN 5420.6182 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/01/03 $35.61 OFFICE SERVICES PB METER REN *TAL 800 - 228 -1071. CT 5710.6235 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/01/04 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES - POSTAGE 800 - 468 -8454 CT 5710.6235 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/01/23 $100.00 POSTAGE PITN EYB OWES- POSTAGE 800- 468 -8454 CT 5710.6235 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/12/21 ($5.00) SYSTEM TEST CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EDINA MN 5760.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/01/22 $31.28 REPAIR PARTS FERGUSON ENT #1649 952 - 894 -9385 MN 5761.6530 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/01/22 $199.34 GENERAL SUPPLIES MENARDS 3021 BURNSVILLE MN 5761.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/29 $25.15 OTHER PARTY CITY #773 BLOOMINGTON MN 5822.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/29 $25.15 OTHER PARTY CITY #773 BLOOMINGTON MN 5842.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/29 $25.15 OTHER PARTY CITY #773 BLOOMINGTON MN 5862.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/31 $40.41 FOOD DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 5860.6106 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 12/27/12-01/26/13 Number Account Name Date Amount MCCG Description Merchant Name City State Account * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/30 $10.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5820.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/30 .$12.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE-MAX EDINA MN 5840.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/12/30 $10.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5860.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/01/04 $12.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5820.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/01/04 $28.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5840.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/01/12 $191.87 REPAIR PARTS JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAR EDINA MN 5841.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2012/12/27 $9.35 VEHICLE EXPENSE HOLIDAY STNSTORE 0025 MINNEAPOLIS MN 7414.6106 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/01/01 $47.52 OFFICE SERVICES EMA *EMMA EMAIL MARKETING 800 - 5954401 TN 7410.6105 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/01/10 $81.18 OFFICE SERVICES GOOGLE *5107668870 CC @GOOGLE.COM CA 7410.6122 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/02 $162.86 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/03 $45.02 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7412.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/03 $79.77 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7412.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/08 $47.28 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7412.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/08 $15.00 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6511 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/09 $20.73 SUPPLIES BDI *BEARING DISTRIBUTR 216 - 642 -9100 OH 7412.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/09 $4.27 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411:6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/11 $77.15 SUPPLIES BDI *BEARING DISTRIBUTR 216 - 642 -9100 OH 7411.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/01/22 $7.55 SUPPLIES BDI *BEARING DISTRIBUTR 216- 642 -9100 OH 7413.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2012/01/23 $9.75 FOOD RAINBOW FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7410.6106 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2012/01/23 $11.78 BATTERIES THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7410.6406 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2013/01/08 $55.64 SUPPLIES GUNSTOP RELOADING 9524740211 MN 7412.6406 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2013/01/14 $60.04 SUPPLIES GANDER MOUNTAIN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7414.6218 * *9781 DAVID AMON 2013/01/16 $341.13 SUPPLIES GUNSTOP RELOADING 9524740211 MN 7412.6406 $23,421.84 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies a d procedures d5e Vi a / 1 3 r To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen ,l� o e 0 INNS Agenda Item #: IV. C. Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: February 19, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -Sale, Sunday Sale, Wine and Beer Liquor License Renewals Action Requested: Council approve the Club On -Sale, On -Sale Intoxicating, Sunday Sale, Wine and Beer Liquor License renewals as presented for the period beginning April 1, 2013 and ending March 31, 2014. Information / Background: Applications for renewal of On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -sale, Sunday On -Sale, Wine On -Sale, Beer On -Sale and Beer Off -Sale Liquor Licenses for the establishments listed below. All applications have been reviewed by the Edina Police Department and renewals are recommended per the attached memo. The applicants have submitted all necessary paperwork in accordance with the City's liquor ordinance and State Statutes, and have paid their license fees. In the case of the applicants for both wine and beer licenses, statute allows the establishments to also sell strong beer in their restaurants. One licensee, Biranyani has not to date filed a renewal application. They have been informed and understand that they will have a license interruption due to the lateness of their renewal. Edina's renewal date is April 1, 2013. Once the Council approves the renewals, staff will forward all necessary documentation to the Minnesota Liquor Control for state approval. Following is a listing of requested renewals by category: On -Sale Intoxicating & Sunday Sale Big Bowl Cocina Del Barrio Crave Restaurant Eden Avenue Grill Edina Grill Restaurant Lake Shore Grill McCormick & Schmick Seafood Restaurant Mozza Mia P.F. Chang's Bistro Pinstripes, Inc. Pittsburgh Blue Raku Inc. Romano's Macaroni Grill Ruby Tuesday Salut Bar Americain Tavern On France The Cheesecake Factory Westin Edina Galleria Club & Sunday Sale Edina Country Club Interlachen Country Club City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 On -Sale Wine and On -Sale 3.2 Beer Beaujo's Chipotle Mexican Grill Cooks of Crocus Hill D'Amico & Sons Good Earth Restaurant On -Sale 3.2 Licenses: Chuck E. Cheese's Davanni's Pizza /Hoagies Off -Sale 3.2 Licenses: Cub Foods DB Convenience LLC (Edina Market & Deli) Holiday Stationstore #217 Attachments: Sgt. Tim Olson's Memo Marriott Residence Inn Noodles & Company People's Organic Coffee /Wine Galleria Cafe Rice Paper Asian Fusion Restaurant Us of Edina Restaurant Jerry's Foods Speedway SuperAmerica LLC 4 Memo To: Chief Jeff Long From: SergeV) Iso� Date: February 26, 2013 Re: Liquor License Renewals Background checks have been completed for the 2013 -2014 licensing period for the following liquor licenses: On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale, Wine and 3.2 Beer On -Sale, 3.2 Beer On -Sale, 3.2 Beer Off - Sale, and Club On -Sale and Sunday Sale The following restaurants and country clubs comply with City code. An unqualified recommendation for approval of these renewal applications is warranted. ON-SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE • Big Bowl • Cocina Del Barrio • Crave Restaurant • Eden Avenue Grill • Edina Grill Restaurant • Lake Shore Grill • McCormick & Schmick's • Mozza Mia • P.F. Chang's China Bistro • Pinstripes • Pittsburg Blue • Raku Inc • Romano's Macaroni Grill • Ruby Tuesday • Salut Bar Americain • Tavern on France • The Chees2cake Factory • Westin Edina Galleria • Page 1 im WINE AND 3.2 BEER ON-SALE • Beaujo's • Chipotle Mexican Grill • Cooks of Crocus Hill • D'Amico & Sons • Good Earth Restaurant • Marriott Residence Inn • Noodles & Company • Peoples Organic Coffee and Wine Cafe • Rice Paper • Vs of Edina BEER 3.2 ON -SALE • Davanni's Pizza /Hoagie • Chuck E. Cheese BEER 3.2 OFF -SALE • Cub Foods • DB Convenience LLC (Edina Market and Deli) • Holiday Stationstore #217 • Jerry Foods • Speedway Superamerica, LLC CLUB ON-SALE AND SUNDAY SALE • Edina Country Club • Interlachen Country Club • Page 2 To: City Council From: Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager Date: March 5, 2013 Subject: Park and Recreation Turf Management Plan w9�N��lry o Ceq Cn H�v �y • `�COAPORP�� � 1880 Agenda Item #: IV. D. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Adopt the Edina Park and Recreation Turf Management Plan With Proposed Staff Edits. Information / Background: The Turf Management Task Force was formed in September 2010 at the request of the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) as a response to Edina residents' concerns on the use of herbicides in parks and children play areas. The Task Force consisted of one member each from the EEC, the Community Health Committee and the Park Board. The City was represented by the former Superintendent of Parks. The Task Force reviewed the original Turf Management Plan and evaluated how it was implemented from 1994 to date. The Task Force reports that herbicides were not always applied according to the plan. Residents' concerns about excessive dandelion weeds in untreated areas (classified as "C" in the plan) had prompted treatment of those areas with one -time spraying of the herbicide 2,4 D early in the spring. The Task Force revised the Turf Management Plan (January 13, 2012) to update the list of recreation, facility and open areas and their related designation for weed tolerance and control. The designations for several areas were changed from the original plan to raise the level of weed tolerance and eliminate all but organic weed control. The Plan further notes "Organic herbicides have been shown to be an effective non -toxic alternative for lawn care. Unlike chemicals, organic applications require attention to proper timing and weather conditions. Typically, it takes three to four seasons to eliminate weeds, compared with just one application per season for the chemicals." The Plan was reviewed with the Council during a joint work session with the EEC on January 21, 2012. Due to staff transitions, the Plan was not forwarded to the Council for official approval. We apologize for this oversight. However, the Parks and Recreation Department followed the guidelines during the 2012 growing season. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Current Parks and Recreation and Public Works leadership supports the intent and work done by the Task Force to reduce the use of pesticides on City property. Current leadership would suggest the following edits to the plan: 1) City Hall is returned to an A designation from an O/C designation. 2) Category O is clarified to allow for the use of organic applications prior to the presence of 15 % -25% weed cover. Staff believes that organic applications will be more effective before weeds have an established presence on the property. It is important to note that staff experience with organic applications has yielded mixed results. Residents are likely to see more weeds over the next few years as the residual impact of the herbicides wears off. As a result, we anticipate more resident complaints about the condition of the City parks and facilities, as well — -- complaints- about the - spreading -of weeds_to_private _ property._Staff would benefit from assistance from the EEC with respect to public education and would recommend that this be considered for a future work plan. Attachment: • Edina Park and Recreation Turf Management Plan - Revised January 13, 2012 (Redline Version) h, y '. I' .� i Introduction The City of Edina owns and maintains over 1,500 acres of beautiful park land, wooded areas and open space within its city boundaries. Approximately 600 acres are grassy areas that are routinely maintained on a mowing schedule. In addition, the Edina Park and Recreation Department also maintains many acres of highway islands and boulevards. Part of the maintenance responsibility includes controlling undesirable and/or injurious pests, such as weeds, insects and fungus to an acceptable level of tolerance. Some of the Edina Park Maintenance Department turf management practices that have been used in the past have included the use of fertilizers and herbicides. . Terminology By dictionary definition, pesticides are chemicals used to kill pests, such as insects and rodents. Herbicides are chemicals used to eradicate (kill) plants, such as weeds and grasses. In fact, the term "cide" means killer. The word "pesticides', however, is commonly used as the term that includes all the "cides" in the industry, such as fungicides, insecticides, and herbicides. In other words, all herbicides are considered to be a type of pesticide. There are 18 major pesticides that are used in approximately 2,100 different lawn care products. Selective herbicides are chemicals that are designed to eradicate specific plants, such as broad leaf weeds, while not harmfully affecting other plant species that share common turf, such as desirable grasses. One of the most commonly used selective herbicide chemical is 2,4 -D. Non - selective herbicides are chemicals that are designed to eradicate all "green' plant life. In other words, Non - selective herbicides, such as Roundup (a water soluble Non - selective herbicide brand name manufactured by Monsanto Company), are used to kill all green plants, such as all turf grasses and weeds. Non - selective herbicides essentially block the photosynthetic process in plants. Turf areas that have been treated with Non - selective herbicides can be re- turfed (seeded or sodded) within a week after application. Non - selective herbicides are commonly used to kill green growth around trees and under fencing to eliminate the need for labor intensive grass /weed trimming. Organic herbicides are non - chemicals. often plant -based such as corn gluten. that work b inhibiting root formation at the time of germination. The timing of application is very important for the treatment to be effective. Turf must be treated before weeds germinate. Organic herbicides have low or no toxicitv for humans and animals and break down ranidly in the environment after application. History One of the turf management practices that has been used by the Edina Park Maintenance Department to control weeds and other undesirable grasses has included broadcast applications of selective herbicides by licensed herbicide applicators. This practice has long been viewed as an economical approach to weed control. The largest grassy areas of the Edina Park System have typically been treated with selective herbicides (sprayed on in a liquid form) once per year in the Spring. These large area applications have been carried out by Edina Park Maintenance staff who have been trained and licensed by the Minnesota State Department of Agriculture. The smaller areas, such as roadway triangles and islands, that are more labor intensive to maintain, have been annually treated with selective herbicides in the Spring by contracted turf care companies, such as True Green ChemLawn. The heavily scheduled athletic fields throughout the Edina Park System have typically been treated with selective herbicides in a liquid form in the Spring and have received an application of weed and feed granular (combination fertilizer and selective herbicide) in the Fall of the year. Fertilizers are typically applied once or twice annually to turf areas in need of nutrients to maintain healthy grasses. Fertilizers are not herbicides and are not considered to be a member of the "pesticide" family. Fertilizers are essentially nutrients (food) for grass plants. The large open grassy areas throughout the Edina Park System have not been treated with fertilizers in past practices, mainly due to economic reasons. In the past, the Edina Park and Recreation Department has used non - selective herbicides, such as Roundup, to eliminate green growth around trees, under fencing, around hockey boards and in cracks that develop in tennis courts and hard surface areas, such as basketball courts. This practice has been an economical approach to grass and weed trimming, mainly for aesthetic purposes. The eradication of weeds and grasses that develop in cracks in tennis courts and hard surfaces courts has been done for two main reasons: 1 Eliminate hazardous play surface conditions (safety reasons). 2 Minimize further damage to the hard surface area (economic reasons). The main goal of the Edina Park and Recreation Department's turf management plan has long been to maintain safe and aesthetic turf in the most economical fashion allowed by law. The Edina Park and Recreation Department's past practices have been carried out by hard working, dedicated and well trained maintenance personnel who take great pride in their work. The City of Edina and its Park Maintenance Department have always been concerned and conscious of the impact of its turf maintenance practices on human and animal health and the environment. Because the most important factor in applying herbicides is safety (especially that of children), the Park and Recreation Department has voluntarily made (and continues to make) changes in its own methodology in the application of herbicides to help minimize herbicide exposure to children. During the Spring of 1994, several concerned residents questioned the potential health hazards associated with the Edina Park and Recreation Department's turf management practices. At the Edina City Council meeting on Monday, June 20, 1994, the Edina City Council directed staff to work with Edina Community Health Advisory Committee (ECHSAC) to establish a plan and a process that addresses the concerns of the use of herbicides on City owned property. ECHSAC July 13, 1994, Meetin The ECHSAC met on Monday, July 13, 1994, to discuss this issue. After lengthy discussion, it was determined that the goal should be to find alternative methods of turf management to control pests, such as weeds, that require considerably less or no herbicides. The issue regarding the potential health hazards and environmental impact associated with the use of herbicides was discussed and there was clearly debate on both sides of the issue. It was determined by the ECHSAC that, at this point in time, there is not enough undisputed conclusive evidence that suggests that the Edina Park and Recreation Department's current use of herbicides does or does not pose potential health or environmental hazards. Therefore, the recommendation of the ECHSAC was for the City of Edina to establish a turf management plan that errs on the safe side of herbicide use. The action taken by the ECHSAC at that meeting was as follows: -- - - - -- - - - — ----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Bob Wilkins MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT WORK WITH THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IN CREATING A CLASSIFICATION OF PARK PROPERTIES AND RECOMMEND AN APPLICATION PROCESS THAT WOULD LIMIT AND REDUCE USE OF HERBICIDES IN RESPONSE TO CITIZENS CONCERN. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO HERBICIDE USE, THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS INVESTIGATING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM), A PROGRAM EMPHASIZING FERTILIZING, SEEDING, AND MOWING. THIS PROGRAM WOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR IMPLEMENTATION IF THERE IS PROVEN EFFECTIVENESS. Audrey Runyan SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. At the August 1, 1994, City Council meeting, the Edina City Council directed the staff to research and recommend a plan to reduce the use of herbicides on public properties and present the recommendations initially to the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee. The ECHSAC was asked to review staffs recommendations for alternatives for turf management during the month of December, 1994. The plan was to then have staff take the ECHSAC's recommendations to the Edina Park Board at the January, 1995, Park Board meeting. The Edina City Council has further directed that the matter then be brought before the Edina City Council on Monday, February 6, 1995. At the November 10h ECHSAC meeting, the ECHSAC was concerned about the long term effects of herbicide use, as well as, recommending a realistic and acceptable plan using preventative measures that will benefit people 20 to 30 years from now. The ECHSAC determined that there is good reason to establish a plan and policy that reduces the amount of herbicide use on public and private lands. Through this study, it was learned that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registers, rather than licenses, herbicides and pesticides. Therefore, the EPA does not guarantee the safety of the products they review. The EPA can, however, require testing of products and recently stipulated, for example, that the 24, D manufacturers repeat an animal -cancer study. The EPA has also asked the industry to take voluntary risk - reduction measures while the study proceeds. According to the 1993 General Accounting Office (GAO) Report, the EPA is more concerned with the health effects of one -time or short-term exposures to MCPP and dicamba along with 2,4 -D (which are "licensed herbicides" currently used by the Edina Park and Recreation Department). The 1993 GAO Report also states that dicamba and 2,4 -D are deemed "restricted use candidates" by the EPA due to groundwater concerns. The one fact that is most commonly misunderstood by the public is that an EPA "licensed herbicide" is not necessarily "safe'' with regards to human and /or environmental health. Through this study we have further learned that the EPA has not yet developed guidelines to assess the health effects of human exposure to pesticides after they are applied to lawns. In particular, the EPA is concerned about the persistence of pesticides in the environment and potential effect on children, who may have more contact with treated lawns than adults (1993 GAO report). Edina Park Board January 10, 1995 Meeting At the January 10, 1995 Edina Park Board meeting, the Edina Park Board took the following action: Mr. Fee MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT WE ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ECHSAC AND RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY ADOPT THE TURF MANAGEMENT PLAN AS PRESENTED IN THE REPORT SUBJECT TO ANNUAL REVIEW OR SOONER IF DETERMINED NECESSARY. John Dovolis SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES There are various but limited turf management practices that promote healthy grass growth and turf stability while minimizing weed growth without the use of herbicides. The goal is to create a strong and healthy grass that dominates weed growth. Ideally, the goal is to maintain healthy turf grasses while controlling the percentage of pests (weeds) within a predetermined tolerance level without the use of herbicides. Desirable grasses need four main elements to survive: I Air 2 Water 3 Food (nutrients) 4 Sunlight Grasses cannot survive when any of the above elements are absent. The most important element is air. In other words, if soil is too compacted, grasses cannot breath. The second most critical element is water. Desirable grasses do not compete well against weeds and undesirable grass plants in drought conditions. The fact is that weed plants (such as knotweed) and undesirable grass plants (such as sandbur) are typically much hardier plants than desirable grasses (such as bluegrass or ryegrass). If left to nature without any interference of turf maintenance, weeds and undesirable grasses will eventually dominate the turf. In some cases, a weed dominated turf can lead to unsafe or intolerable turf conditions for certain turf users, such as softball, baseball, soccer and football players and golfers. Integrated pest management practices that help desirable grasses best compete with weeds are as follows: 1 Irrigation Aeration 3 Proper drainage - -- - -- - - - - -- - 4 More frequent mowing schedule whenever possible (ideally never cut more than 1/3 of the grass plant each cut) 5 Set mowers higher (cut grasses ideally at 2'/2 ") 6 Proper fertilization schedule (more frequent and smaller quantities per application, plus proper timing) 7 Over seeding (slit seeding) 8 Top dressing 9 Use most durable grass seed mixture selections 10 Sodding where practical I 1 Minimizing thatch where needed 12 Spot use applications (as opposed to broadcast applications) of least toxic herbicides only in cases where the intended activity would be intolerably compromised or when an economic or potential human injury is at risk To achieve'the goal to use the least amount of herbicides possible, staff is proposing the following IPM based turf management plan: TURF MANAGEMENT PLAN (GOALS) 1 Identify existing pests, such as weeds, and their current percentage make up of existing ground cover. 2 Identify stressed areas of turf and evaluate IPM based options for treatment of the problem. 3 Establish a classification of Edina's public -owned park lands and open space and establish a weed tolerance level to each property. 4 Establish reasonable investments needed and desired to assure best results utilizing IPM based principles in turf management. 5 Routinely monitor and analyze success of IPM based turf management program in writing: a Identify the pest (weed) and the size (density) of its infestation. b Keep records of effectiveness of treatment on solving each turf problem; irrigation, fertilization, mowing, aeration, dethaching, and, as a last resort, use of least toxic chemical. c Keep records of citizen complaints and•comments related to turf management program. 6 Develop a list of acceptable management strategies for eradication of weeds when weed dominance exceeds predetermined tolerance levels, such as: a .Predetermine a list of herbicides that are effective against the targeted pest (weed) but . is least disruptive to the environment, and human and animal health. b Use methods of selective spot treatments` instead of broadcast treatments whenever possible. c Post signage before, during and after applying herbicides. Signs should carry the following information: I) date of application: 2) any advisojy Jeguired.by State law. _ - Deleted: to keep off the grass for at least 7 d Apply herbicides only as a last resort. - - days after application. Signs should be clearly legible e Consult a professional turf restoration professional before determining that herbicides are necessary. It is recommended to continue this practice for a minimum of two years. f Making sure that herbicides are applied by only licensed herbicide applicators. 7 Designate a responsible individual (or individuals) for making decisions to carry out and evaluate.the turf management plan. 8 Educate full -time maintenance staff as to best turf management practices using integrated pest management approaches to pest control. In other words. become self - reliant to avoid long -term reliance on consulting expertise. 9 Promote and educate the public as to responsible effective private lawn care practices. Encourage the public to implement integrated pest management practices on their private properties: Turf Management Task Force The TurfManaeement Task Force was formed in September 2010 at the request of the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) as a response to Edina residents' concerns on the use of herbicides in parks and children play areas. The Task Force consisted of one member each from the EEC commission, the Community and Health Committee and the Park Board. The City was represented by the Superintendent of Parks. The Task Force reviewed the original Turf Management Plan and evaluated how it was implemented from 1994 to date. It was discovered that herbicides were not always applied according to the plan. Residents' concerns about excessive dandelion weeds in untreated areas (classified as "C" in the plan) had prompted treatment of those areas with one -time spraying of the herbicide 2.4 D early in the springy Organic herbicides have been shown to be as an effective non -toxic alternative for lawn care. Unlike chemicals. however. organic applications require additional attention to proper timing 7 and weather conditions. Typically. it takes three to four.seasons to eliminate weeds. compared with lust one application per season for the chemicals. The Turf Management Task Force concluded that organics can be easily integrated within the current turf management practiced by staff. Organics will be the environmental preferable alternative to treating areas that have 25% tolerance for weeds and are located at or near children play areas. The revised plan uses a new label "O" to indicate turf areas that will be treated with organics. .A statement will be added to the City website indicating that there will be no spraying - - - Deleted: Signs will be posted near children play - areas to make it known that they have not been within 30 feet of children's play areas. The Turf Management Task Force recommends that the. chemically treated. Edina Energy and Environment Commission reviewtturf mans ee ment practices every five years _ _ Deleted: ing in consultation with the Park Board. with the goal of brogressively decreasing e of ----- - -- - -- - -- ------- - - - - -- -- the us- - -- -- - -- — chemical pesticides. WEED TOLERANCE CLASSIFICATION FOR CITY OF EDINA OWNED PROPERTY WEED TOLERANCE CLASSIFICATION FOR CITY OF EDINA OWNED PROPERTY In 1995, the City of Edina adopted the following standards to Edina's public -owned parklands and open space. Next to each classified public land or open space, is a suggested category (A -D) designation as to the level of weed tolerance proposed for that particular area. In turn, each classification dictates the type of turf management needed for that specific ground cover. The definition of each category is as follows: CATEGORY A These areas shall have a 0 -5% tolerance for weeds. In other words, herbicides will not be applied to_these_ground_ covers _untiI weed _growth makes up 5% of the total ground cover and it has been determined that there are no other reasonable methods of weed control. CATEGORY B These areas shall have a 15 %-25% tolerance for weeds. In other words, herbicides will not be applied to these ground covers until weed growth makes up 15 % -25% of the total ground cover and it has been determined that there are no other reasonable methods of weed contr4 ----------- Deleted:. CATEGORY C These areas shall have a 100% tolerance for weeds. In other words, herbicides will not be used I s a means to eradicate weeds with the exception of noxious weeds or other exotics mandated by State Law. If necessary, where needed or desired, these areas will undergo a returfiiient (restoratior�_which will replace-or restore existing ground cover. ----------------------- Deleted:), CATEGORY D These are areas that are subject to special herbicide applications, such as eradication of noxious weeds as mandated by Minnesota State law and the creation of oak savanna forests. In essence, all public -owned and private -owned properties are subject to category in the event that noxious weeds are present. CATEGORY O These areas shall have a 15 % -25% tolerance for weeds. These areas are scheduled and non- scheduled athletic fields located near schools or untreated areas. It is desirable to reduce the amount of chemicals in these areas to avoid unnecessary health and environmental risks. These areas shal l either be treated with ore_ anics. or revert to category C. These areas are indicated below as "O /C" *These areas were changed from staff's recommended category "B" to category "C" by the Edina Community Health Services Advisory These were changed for reasons of minimizing potential herbicide exposure to children (Comelia School fields, Creek Valley School fields and the Yorktown Park field next to the Southdale YMCA). CATEGORY 1 GOLF COURSES: • Braemar Golf Course (36 holes) A • Braemar Golf Driving Range A • Normandale Golf Course (9 holes), A - 2 FLOWER GARDENS: • 72 different sites throughout park system A • Formal Gardens at Arneson Acres Park A 3 SCHEDULED ATHLETIC FIELDS (CAN BE LOCKED /SECURED): • Braemar soccer field (one field) A • Courtney Fields Baseball Complex (4 fields) A • Garden Park baseball field (one field) A • Van Valkenburg Park Softball Complex (3 fields) A Deleted: z Deleted- s 4 MULTIPLE -USE SCHEDULED ATHLETIC FIELDS: Deleted:. C•toB • Alden Park soccer field (1 field) B Deleted: I • Cornelia School softball fields (1 field Deleted: .C•toB • Cornelia School baseball field (fields) � " Deleted: 3 - - ........... ' ' • Countryside Park baseball fields Qfields) B Deleted: 3 • Creek Valley soccer fields (�5 fields) , _ - Deleted: c•to B • Garden Park softball field (1 field) B Formatted: Font: Bold • Garden Park soccer fields 4 fields B _ _ Deleted: z • Highlands Park soccer field Q fields B Deleted: I • Highlands Park softball field (1 field) B Deleted: Lake Comelia • o and Park aseball field I field _ _ {,- Deleted: e ��--------- - -d - -- ---------------------------- • Rosland Park Disc Golf (l field) O/C Deleted: softball • �toslandPark�lp baseball) __________BI______________ • Lewis Park soccer /football fields fields B Deleted: B .. • Normandale Park baseball field (I field) B Moved (Insertion) [1] • amela Park softball fields field B • Pamela Park soccer fields fields B - --- )------------------- ---------- - - - - -- Deleted: <#>Pamela Pack baseball fields �z • Strachauer Park (2 soccer) B fields) _ _ .. B¶ • Todd Park softball field (1 field) O/C --------- Deleted: I. . • Walnut Ridge Park (2 Lacrosse) B Deleted- z • Weber Park baseball )field oftball fields fields ( )rS-------- - - - - -� -- - - - - - B --- - - - - - - - - - - - Deleted:8 • Woo ddale Park baseball /softball field (1 field) B Deleted i I•--------------------- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 5 MULTIPLE =USE NON - SCHEDULED ATHLETIC FIELDS: Deleted Deleted: <k> Yorktown Park softball field Q field :.:. C•deletd (one field each) Deleted: <s >Alden Park ..... • Arden Park O/ C to B¶ • Birchcrest Park O /C4 -' Deleted :.toB -- - - - - - - - - - Deleted: to 11 10 MEDIAN GRASS AREAS (ISLANDS AND TRIANGLES): • Frontage roads • Bristol O/C .Boulevards B Triangles/medians • Browndale O/C York Ave. Island B. • Boulevards adjoining Bredesen Park • Chowen Park O/ - — �'---- - - - Deleted: to B O/C • Heights Park - - - --- O/C - _ - Deleted: CB (organic treatment) 12 Kojetin Park ------------------ �O /QMcGuire Deleted: CB (organic treatment . O/C' ------------ - - Deleted: ¶ • _i____------ ----- - ---- -- --- -------- ---- --- - - -- -- -- ---- ---- ___ _ --_ Deleted:.<#>Normandale Park ...... • Sherwood Park O /C � CtoB¶ • St. Johns's Park _ ---- - - -- -- O /(, Moved up [11: Roseland • �Tingdale Park ------ - - - - O /CS -. Park. - - ....O /C¶. • York Park O/ G'------- .. ------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Deleted. toB 6 SPECIAL USE MAINTAINED FACILITIES (Outdoor areas): BI do <#>stracnaner Park ... . c to B¶ C to • Arneson Park (arboretum and general grounds) A Deleted: to B • Braemar Arena grounds area B Deleted: <#>Walnut Ridge Park - - - - . • Braemar Golf Dome grounds area C C to B$ • Centennial Lakes _A _ _ _ _ _ ---------- Deleted: to s • Edina City Hall Q& - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Deleted: uhBrian Wiouermann Gun • Edina Art Center Range . C delete¶ • Edina Fire Department - -- A Deleted: A • Edina Public Woks Building grounds O/ C Deleted: B Edinborough Park (one acre exterior area) A - - Deleted: A • Frank Tupa Park (historical site) O /C� Deleted: to B) • Williams Park (historical site) ----------------- O/C - Deleted: CB (organic treatment) 7 MAINTAINED OPEN PLAY AREAS /OPEN GREENSPACE: • All 38 parks (approx. 400 acres) C 8 DESIGNATED PICNIC AREAS: • Lake Cornelia Park C • Braemar Park C 9 PLAYGROUND AREAS: 24 playground equipment sites C 10 MEDIAN GRASS AREAS (ISLANDS AND TRIANGLES): • Frontage roads B • .Boulevards B Triangles/medians B • York Ave. Island B. • Boulevards adjoining Bredesen Park O/C • . Boulevards adjoining Duggan Plaza. O/C The "Circle" area of Duggan Plaza O/C 12 I I WOODED/NATURE AREAS: • Braemar Park savanna forest areas D • Bredesen Park C • Lake Cornelia Park C 12 NON - MAINTAINED OPEN SPACE/WOODED AREAS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS PARK LAND: • Fox Meadow Park (park land) O/C • Garden Park Addition (open space) C • Highlands Park O/C • Krahl Hill (open space) C • Lincoln Drive Floodplain (open space) C • Moore Property on Melody Lake (open space) C • Todd Park O/C • Walnut Ridge Park C --------------------- --------- Deleted:u�� 13 HARD SURFACE AREAS: ----- ------ - - - - -- • Basketball courts (8 sites) A • Parking lots A • Pathways A • Tennis courts (15 sites) A 14 INDOOR PARK AREAS WITH PLANT GROWTH: • Edinborough Park (trees, shrubs and flowers) A • Arneson Park greenhouse (primarily flowers) A 15 PLANT GROWTH IN AND AROUND LAKES, PONDS AND CREEKS: • Islands D • Shoreline D 16 OUTDOOR HOCKEY RINKS: • 10 sites C 17 AREAS WITH NOXIOUS WEEDS: • Public -owned property D • Private -owned property D The premier athletic fields that are classified as "A" all have two things in common: 1 Irrigation 2 Fencing Because all class "A" athletic fields have irrigation, they require the least amount of herbicides (and possibly none) (delete) to maintain healthy turf with very few weeds. Irrigation is an important tool and key component in implementing IPM based turf management practices. The 13 only irrigated athletic fields that are suggested to have a class "A" tolerance to weeds are those with fencing. If herbicides are ever needed to maintain their 5 %.weed tolerance, the entire area can be locked and secured from users during and shortly after herbicide applications (typically 24 hours as recommended by herbicide manufacturers). This practice will minimize the potential human exposure to herbicide chemicals. There are currently five Q0)_i!:(%Ated athletic ball fields that are suggested to have a "B_' --------- Deleted: 5 classification for weed tolerance because they do not ave security fencing:. 1 Garden Park soccer fields 4fields . - - Deleted: 2 2 Lewis Park soccer /football field fields) ._3__Pamela.Park soccer fields_ fields Deleted: 2 There are currently three (3) irrigated athletic ball fields that are suggested to have a. "O /C" classification for weed tolerance because they are located next to Creek Valley Elementary Schoo4 - - Deleted: 1 Creek Valley soccer field (3 fields) The. "B" classification irrigated athletic fields will rarely (if ever) need herbicide applications to maintain a weed tolerance of 25 %, whereas, the non- irrigated class "B" athletic fields present a greater challenge to control weed dominance without the use of herbicides.. The main reason for the recommended "B" classification for the five irrigated: athletic fields is due to their lack of fencing to secure access to these areas. With proper equipment, labor and materials, IPM based turf management practices should dramatically reduce or eliminate the use of herbicides on all irrigated athletic fields. The "Hard Surface Areas" have an "A" classification for 3 main reasons: 1 Undesirable weeds that grow in cracks on hard surface areas can create an unsafe surface for users. 2 Non - treated weeds in hard surface cracks can lead to further hard surface damage which could lead intolerable or unreasonable economic injury. 3 Human exposure to spot treatment herbicide use on hard.surface areash very minimal = - - Deleted: are (exposures are typically limited to footwear). At this time, none of the class "C" turf areas have irrigation except the three Creek Valley soccer fields. If this Turf Management Plan is adopted, it is staff s recommendation to direct the Edina Park Maintenance Department to use IPM based turf management techniques to maintain these class "C" weed tolerance areas to as high a standard as possible without the use of herbicides and - - - Deleted:. usinliorQanics when needed Even though these are classified to have the highest level of tolerance for weeds, it is staff s recommendation to attempt to maintain the best turf possible with the available resources and labor (without the use of herbicides). Without irrigation, even good turf management cannot avoid eventual domination of weeds, however, good turf management can successfully deter the inevitable. The length of time for 14 which a good turf management program will succeed on non - irrigated turf depends on turf use, and soil and weather conditions. As mentioned earlier, all property within the City of Edina boundaries (public or private) are subject to a "D" classification if noxious weeds are present. Under the Minnesota Noxious Weed Law (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 18, Sections 18.75 to 18.88), there are hirteen noxious weeds , , - Deleted: ten that have been deemed by the Commissioner of Agriculture to be injurious to public health, Formatted: Front color: Text 2 public roads, crops, livestock. In addition, there are any number of fifty -one (51) secondary Formatted: Font color: Accent t weeds that may be added to the noxious weed list by the Minnesota Commissioner of Agriculture without a hearing or upon petition by the Edina City Mayor and approval by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. The following is a list of the 4hi rteen noxious----------- Deleted: ten weeds: Common Name Botanical Name • ------------ ------------------ 1. Yellow Star Thistle - --- --- ---- --- --- _, - - - Centaurea solstitialis L. 2. Grecian Foxglove. Digitalis lanata Ehrh. 3. Oriental Bittersweet. Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb. 4. Leafy Spurge Euphorbia esula (L.) 5. Canada Thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) . 6. Musk Thistle ---------------------- Carduusnutans -L.1 7. Xlume]ess Thistle Carduus acanthoides (L.) ' - -c ust --------------------- 8. Gar]ic Mustard -lhigHa ------------------------ Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) 9. Purple Loosestrife Lythrum salicaria. vireatum (L.). 10. Wild Parshnip. Pastinaca saliva L. 11. Common Tansy Tanacetum valgare (L.) 12. Spotted Knapweed Centaurea sloebe spp. micranthos 13. Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans (Ktze.) CONCLUSION It is reasonable to expect that the Edina Park and Recreation Department will likely receive many complaints about increased visible weeds in the parks, however, this should not be viewed as a lack of the program's success. A moratorium on herbicide use is not a practical, realistic, or responsible approach to turf management and weed (or pest) control. As previously mentioned, if left to nature without any interference of turf maintenance, weeds and undesirable grasses will eventually dominate the turf. It would be economically unreasonable to routinely:replace ground cover with new turf in efforts to avoid use of all herbicides in all areas at all cost. An IPM based Turf Management Plan is the most reasonable approach to a reduction and, in some cases, elimination of herbicide dependency. To be successful, citizens should be expected to accept higher weed tolerance in many areas of the park system that have previously been managed at a relatively low weed tolerance level. It is 15 Deleted. <# >Field Bindweed. _ .. Convolvulus arvensis¶ <#>Hemp .. .. Cannabis sativa$ <#>Loosestrife, purple . . . Lythrum salicaria or virgatum¶ - < #>Poison ivy _ ..... Rhos radicans¶ <# >Spurge, leafy . . Euphorbia esulal <# >Sowthistle, perennial . . . . Sonchus arvensis$ Deleted: , bull . .. . Cirsium vulgare Deleted:, Canada_ Deleted:, musk Deleted: < # >Thistle, plumeless . .... Carduus acanthoides$ 'y reasonable to anticipate that the most visibly noticeable presence of weeds will be the few weeks in early spring when dandelions (annuals) have flowered. As pointed out at the December 14, 1994, Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee meeting, there are approximately 4,700 acres of privately owned and maintained residential lawn turf and approximately 150 acres of, commercial lawn turf. Combined, there are approximately 4,850 acres of privately owned and maintained lawn turf within the City of Edina, which is about 800% more ground cover than that which is maintained by the Edina Park and Recreation Department. The point is that public education regarding environmentally conscious approaches to lawn care is an important part of this proposal. 16 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: March 5, 2013 oi e r •'�roRPOW% 7888 Agenda Item M IV. E. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Contract No. ENG 13 -2 Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: February 20, 2013 Company: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Palda and Sons, Inc. Valley Paving, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corp. Midwest Asphalt Corp. Recommended Quote or Bid: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: April 20, 2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $1,738,562.34 $1,855,186.81 $1,901,059.73 $1,969,013.60 $1,995,062.25 $1,738,562.34 This project is for street and utility improvements in the Normandale Neighborhood. The project includes spot repairs to existing concrete curb and gutter, reconstructing the existing roadways, storm sewer system repairs, replacing hydrants and gate valves, trunk water main pipe extensions, water and sewer service pipe reconstruction and rehabilitating trunk sanitary sewer pipe. The project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the December 11, 2012 Public Hearing. This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. The bid reflects a potential reduction of approximately 30% in City funded costs. At this point in the process we are anticipating the special assessment to be reduced by approximately 22% to $11,500, versus the $14,800 that was discussed at the project hearing. This value can change based on construction related items such as soil corrections and turf restoration. The final special assessment will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing. Turf restoration for all of the 2013 projects will be hydro- seeded versus sodded. See attached memo discussing the selection of hydro- seeding as the turf restoration technique. Staff recommends awarding the project to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. utilizing hydro -seed for turf establishment. Attachments: Turf Establishment in Reconstruction Projects Memo G.-TVIACENTRAL SVCSXENG DMPROJECTSXCONTRACTSX2013 \ENG 13 -2 NormandalelADMINV-11SCVtem roc Contr No. ENG 13 -2 Normandale.do« City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Engineering Department - Phone 952- 826 -0371 ax 952 - 826 -0392 - www.CityofEdina.com Date: March 5, 2013 To: Mayor and City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Re: Turf Establishment in Reconstruction Projects MEMO SN& O e,, �yD Summary: Staff is recommending the use of hydro -seed for the 2013 projects with a revised contractor maintenance period of 90 -days. Staff feels hydro -seed will better meet the long term needs of the property owners for turf establishment and at the same time reduce special assessment amounts. Background Information: Lawns disturbed by roadway construction have typically been restored with the use of sod. The contractor was responsible for the establishment of sod for a period of 6 weeks (42 days) from the date of installation. After the 6 week maintenance period the property owner is then responsible for the sod. During 2012, residents and staff noticed portions of the sod installed during the 2011 construction season were not healthy. 2012 saw drought conditions for most of the year. Most of the new sod areas were brown and dormant and /or dead. This reflects badly on the construction project even though continued maintenance of the sod is the responsibility of the homeowner. Staff hosted a "Construction Contractor Think Tank" meeting. The goal of this meeting was to determine the advantages and disadvantage of sod and hydro- seeding. We wanted a turf product that property owners could perform the proper maintenance on to establish long lasting turf. Staff invited industry experts for this meeting held on January 7, 2013 at the Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility. Attendees included turf experts, contractors, and consultants familiar with City of Edina practices and clients. Topics discussed included watering, maintenance periods, proper long term care, turf color, installation techniques, drought, fertilizer, chemical treatments, equipment, installation dates and foot traffic. The 2013 bid documents require the Contractor to place 6- inches of topsoil in a level and smooth manner free of stones or other debris that are over 1.5- inches in diameter. Seed, fertilizer, and soil stabilizer is placed in a uniform manner. The Contractor is responsible for mowing the new turf during the maintenance period. The quality of the turf establishment is reviewed after the maintenance period. If the maintenance period does not end by Nov. 1, the remaining balance of the maintenance will carry over and begin on April 15 of the following year. Any turf areas' deemed unacceptable at the end of the maintenance period will be re- hydro- seeded at no cost to the City. Staff realizes that resident education and communications is a key component in the establishment of turf using either method; sod or hydro -seed. Construction update letters and City Extra a -mails will Engineering Department - 7450 Metro Blvd - Edina, MN 55439 MEMO l A o e A, En be used to educate the residents on proper maintenance procedures. Turf maintenance is the responsibility of the property owner after the 90 -day turf maintenance period. Table 1. Comparison of Sod and Hydro -Seed Item Sod Hydro -Seed Cost $5.00 - $6.00 / SY 25 -50% less than sod Water Equal Equal Drought Resistance Less than seed Tolerant of dry conditions Maintenance Identified by Property Owner Appears complete, less realization of maintenance needs Maintenance needs are apparent Color Some issues, defined line between new and existing turf Tends to blend with existing turf Appearance Appears instant Established over time Installation Labor intensive Simple Installation Dates Not recommended during July / early August but can be accomplished Not recommended from June I until July 20 but can be accomplished Installation Maintenance Period 90 days recommended 90 days recommended Foot Traffic Not an issue As little as possible until germination Repairs — Cost $5.00 - $6.00 / SY 25 -50% less than sod Repairs — Installation Labor intensive Simple Repairs — Disturbance Some Minimal Environmental Footprint Sod is planted off -site, harvested, transported, and replanted. Hydro -seed is planted on -site and remains on -site. Based on a research with other communities that use hydro -seed and experience on the West 44th Street project and on information learned from the "Think Tank" session, staff is recommending the use of hydro -seed on the 2013 projects with a revised maintenance period of 90 -days. Staff feels hydro -seed will better meet the long term turf needs of the property owners. 11Ed- nt8\engpubwks~CENTRAL SWMENG DIAPROJECTS%CONTRACTSU0131ENG 13 -1 Mendelssohn AIADMINVISCISod_Seed Mte20130227 WH Memo Turf Est In Recon Proi.dotx Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: March 5, 2013 U 1009 0 • I�roRPOR!`��O • 1886 Agenda Item #: IV. F. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Contract ENG 13 -3 Braemar Hills B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: February 25, 2012 Company: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Valley Paving, Inc. Midwest Asphalt Corporation GMH Asphalt Corporation Palda & Sons, Inc. Hardrives, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: April 27, 2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $ 944,807.33 $1,017,809.80 $1,021,929.60 $1,097,679.00 $1,121,689.20 $1,266,902.08 $944,807.33 This project includes the roadways of Scotia Dr, Tupa Cir, Tupa Dr, St. Patricks Ln, and Gleason Cir. The project involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer system, upgrades to fire hydrants, curb and gutter spot repair, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement. The project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the December 11, 2012 Public Hearing. This project will be funded by special assessments, respective utility funds, and the PACS Fund (for lighting replacement). At this point in the process we are anticipating the special assessments to be reduced by approximately 3% from what was discussed at the project hearing. These values can change based on construction related items such as soil corrections and turf restoration. The final special assessments will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing. Turf restoration for all of the 2013 projects will be hydro- seeded versus sodded. See attached memo discussing the selection of hydro- seeding as the turf restoration technique. Staff recommends awarding the project to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. utilizing hydro -seed for turf establishment. Attachments: Turf Establishment in Reconstruction Projects GAI'MCENTRAL SVCSIENG DIVIPROJECTMCONTRACTS12013XENG 13.3 Braemar Hills BWDMINIMISCUtem IV. F. Con No. ENG 13 -2 Braemar RFP.dooc City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 i Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: March 5, 2013 To: Mayor and City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Re: Turf Establishment in Reconstruction Projects MEMO {gtN�11� o e ` �En �J � ay Summary: Staff is recommending the use of hydro -seed for the 2013 projects with a revised contractor maintenance period of 90 -days. Staff feels hydro -seed will better meet the longterm needs of the property owners for turf establishment and at the same time reduce special assessment amounts. Background Information: Lawns disturbed by roadway construction have typically been restored with the use of sod. The contractor was responsible for the establishment of sod for a period of 6 weeks (42 days) from the date of installation. After the 6 week maintenance period the property owner is then responsible for the sod. During 2012, residents and staff noticed portions of the sod installed during the 2011 construction season were not healthy. 2012 saw drought conditions for most of the year. Most of the new sod areas were brown and dormant and /or dead. This reflects badly on the construction project even though continued maintenance of the sod is the responsibility of the homeowner. Staff hosted a "Construction Contractor Think Tank" meeting. The goal of this meeting was to determine the advantages and disadvantage of sod and hydro- seeding. We wanted a turf product that property owners could perform the proper maintenance on to establish long lasting turf. Staff invited industry experts for this meeting held on January 7, 2013 at the Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility. Attendees included turf experts, contractors, and consultants familiar with City of Edina practices and clients. Topics discussed included watering, maintenance periods, proper long term care, turf color, installation techniques, drought, fertilizer, chemical treatments, equipment, installation dates and foot traffic. The 2013 bid documents require the Contractor to place 6- inches of.topsoil in a level and smooth manner free of stones or other debris that are over 1.5- inches in diameter. Seed, fertilizer, and soil stabilizer is placed in a uniform manner. The Contractor is responsible for mowing the new turf during the maintenance period. The quality of the turf establishment is reviewed after the maintenance period. If the maintenance period does not end by Nov. 1, the remaining balance of the maintenance will carry over and begin on April 15 of the following year. Any turf areas' deemed unacceptable at the end of the maintenance period will be re- hydro- seeded at no cost to the City. Staff realizes that resident education and communications is a key component in the establishment of turf using either method; sod or hydro -seed. Construction update letters and City Extra a -mails will Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 MEMO o e ° ' stn En 0 •'A S� be used to educate the residents on proper maintenance procedures. Turf maintenance is the responsibility of the property owner after the 90 -day turf maintenance period. Table I. Comparison of Sod and Hydro -Seed Item Sod Hydro -Seed Cost $5.00 - $6.00 / SY 25 -50% less than sod Water Equal Equal Drought Resistance Less than seed Tolerant of dry conditions Maintenance Identified by Property Owner Appears complete, less realization of maintenance needs Maintenance needs are apparent Color Some issues, defined line between new and existing turf Tends to blend with existing turf Appearance Appears instant Established over time Installation Labor intensive Simple Installation Dates Not recommended during July / early August but can be accomplished Not recommended from June I until July 20 but can be accomplished Installation Maintenance Period 90 days recommended 90 days recommended Foot Traffic Not an issue As little as possible until germination Repairs — Cost $5.00 - $6.00 / SY 25 -50% less than sod Repairs — Installation Labor intensive Simple Repairs — Disturbance Some Minimal Environmental_ Footprint Sod is planted off -site, harvested, transported, and replanted. Hydro -seed is planted on -site and remains on -site. Based on a research with other communities that use hydro -seed and experience on the West 4461 Street project and on information learned from the "Think Tank" session, staff is recommending the use of hydro -seed on the 2013 projects with a revised maintenance period of 90 -days. Staff feels hydro -seed will better meet the long term turf needs of the property owners. 1\Ed•nt8lengpubwkslPW10ENTRAL SVCS%ENG DIVIPROJECTSICONTRACTS120131ENG 13.1 Mendelssohn AWDMINNISC1Sod Seed Mq120130227 WH Memo Turf Est in Recon ProJ.docx Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: March 5, 2013 ow Le r Lt4,) 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. G. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Contract ENG 13 -4 Lake Edina Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: February 25, 2012 Company: Palda & Sons, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Midwest Asphalt Corporation GMH Asphalt Corporation Hardrives, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Palda & Sons, Inc. Bid or Expiration Date: April 27, 2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $3,158,445.82 $3,173,656.53 $3,298,501.35 $3,540,224.60 $3,888,537.20 $3,158,445.82 General Information: This project involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer system, upgrades to fire hydrants, curb and gutter spot repair, reconstruction of bituminous pavement, and cosmetic sound wall improvements. The project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the December 11, 2012 Public Hearing. This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. The City funded costs saw no change based on bids. At this point in the process we are anticipating the special assessment to be reduced by approximately 40% to $7,200, versus the $12,500 that was discussed at the project hearing. This value can change based on construction related items such as soil corrections and turf restoration. The final special assessment will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing. Turf restoration for all of the 2013 projects will be hydro- seeded versus sodded. See attached memo discussing the selection of hydro- seeding as the turf restoration technique. Staff recommends awarding the project to Palda & Sons, Inc. utilizing hydro -seed for turf establishment. Attachments: Turf Establishment in Reconstruction Projects Memo GAPMCENTRAL SVCMENG DIV\PROJECTMCONTRACTSUOI AENG 13-4 Lake EdinAADMIMMISCUtem W.G. Con No. ENG 13A Lk Edina RFP.do« City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: March 5, 2013 To: Mayor and City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Re: Turf Establishment in Reconstruction Projects MEMO o+ a Summary: Staff is recommending the use of hydro -seed for the 2013 projects with a revised contractor maintenance period of 90 -days. Staff feels hydro -seed will better meet the long term needs of the property owners for turf establishment and at the same time reduce special assessment amounts. Background Information: Lawns disturbed by roadway construction have typically been restored with the use of sod. The contractor was responsible for the establishment of sod for a period of 6 weeks (42 days) from the date of installation. After the 6 week maintenance period the property owner is then responsible for the sod. During 2012, residents and staff noticed portions of the sod installed during the 2011 construction season were not healthy. 2012 saw drought conditions for most of the year. Most of the new sod areas were brown and dormant and /or dead.. This reflects badly on the construction project even though continued maintenance of the sod is the responsibility of the homeowner. Staff hosted a "Construction Contractor Think Tank" meeting. The goal of this meeting was to determine the advantages and disadvantage of sod and hydro- seeding. We wanted a turf product that property owners could perform the proper maintenance on to establish long lasting turf. Staff invited industry experts for this meeting held on January 7, 2013 at the Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility. Attendees included turf experts, contractors, and consultants familiar with City of Edina practices and clients. Topics discussed included watering, maintenance periods, proper long term care, turf color, installation techniques, drought, fertilizer, chemical treatments, equipment, installation dates and foot traffic. The 2013 bid documents require the Contractor to place 6- inches of topsoil in a level and smooth manner free of stones or other debris that are over 1.5- inches in diameter. Seed, fertilizer, and soil stabilizer is placed in a uniform manner. The Contractor is responsible for mowing the new turf during the maintenance period. The quality of the turf establishment is reviewed after the maintenance period. If the maintenance period does not end by Nov. I, the remaining balance of the maintenance will carry over and begin on April 15 of the following year. Any turf areas' deemed unacceptable at the end of the maintenance period will be re- hydro- seeded at no cost to the City. Staff realizes that resident education and communications is a key component in the establishment of turf using either method; sod or hydro -seed. Construction update letters and City Extra a -mails will Engineering Department 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 MEMO 491�'11� U) , e be used to educate the residents on proper maintenance procedures. Turf maintenance is the responsibility of the property owner after the 90 -day turf maintenance period. Table I. Comparison of Sod and Hydro -Seed Item Sod Hydro -Seed Cost $5.00 - $6.00 / SY 25 -50% less than sod Water Equal Equal Drought Resistance Less than seed Tolerant of dry conditions Maintenance Identified by Property Owner Appears complete, less realization of maintenance needs Maintenance needs are apparent Color Some issues, defined line between new and existing turf Tends to blend with existing turf Appearance Appears instant Established over time Installation Labor intensive Simple Installation Dates Not recommended during July / early August but can be accomplished Not recommended from June I until July 20 but can be accomplished Installation Maintenance Period 90 days recommended 90 days recommended Foot Traffic Not an issue As little as possible until germination Repairs — Cost $5.00 - $6.00 / SY 25 -50% less than sod Repairs — Installation Labor intensive Simple. Repairs — Disturbance Some Minimal Environmental Footprint Sod is planted off -site, harvested, transported, and replanted. Hydro -seed is planted on -site and remains on -site. Based on a research with other communities that use hydro -seed and experience on the West 44th Street project and on information learned from the "Think Tank" session, staff is recommending the use of hydro -seed on the 2013 projects with a revised maintenance period of 90 -days. Staff feels hydro -seed will better meet the long term turf needs of the property owners. \\Ed- nt81engpubwks\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTMCONTRACTS\20131ENG 13 -1 Mendelssohn A\ADMIN\MISC\Sod_Seed Mtg\20130227 WH Memo Turf Est In Recon Proj.docK Engineering Department - 7450 Metro Blvd - Edina, MN 55439 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL o e �� �4�� � may° CIO • jNroRPOIiP`�� � IBBB Agenda Item #: IV. H. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: March 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Consultant Engineering Construction Phase Services for Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for Consultant Engineering Construction Phase Services for Normandale Neighborhood Reconstruction project. Information / Background: Attached is the proposal from SEH, Inc. for construction phase services for Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project. This project is being awarded to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. and is scheduled to begin early spring of 2013. The estimated fee for this service is $212,436. The combined fee for the feasibility, design, and construction services is estimated at $454,242; this cost is below the costs indicated in the Feasibility Study. Attachments: Proposal of Consultant Engineering Construction Phase Services for Normandale Neighborhood Reconstruction GA W\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIVTROJECTMCONTRACTSM I MENG 13 -2 Normandale\ADMIN \LEGAL \Item IV. H. Consultant Engineering City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 k J SEH Building 6 Better World for All of Us" February 26, 2013 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Wayne: SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT RE: City of Edina Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Construction Phase Services City Contract No. ENG 13 -2 SEH No. EDINA121719 10.00 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.® (SEH) thanks you for the opportunity to assist the City of Edina (City) with construction phase services for the referenced project: We will provide these services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated July 25, 1988, herein called the Agreement. We have enclosed a Task Hour Budget (THB) that describes our not -to- exceed fee of $212,436.00, scope, and key assumptions for this project. We have based our proposal on our experience from providing construction phase services on previous City projects and the level of service the City requires for its residents during reconstruction. In the table below, cell B3 is the total engineering fee estimated in the feasibility study. Cell C3 is the actual total engineering fee for the project. Because the total engineering fee in cell C3 is considerably less than the fee in cell B3, our engineering fee will not increase the estimated amount of the special assessment. Engineers I Architects I Planners .I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax Total Engineering Fee Item Estimated in Feasibility Actual Stud Feasibility Study, Bid Documents and $241,806 Bidding Assistance Construction Phase $452,954 $212,436 Services Total $694,760 $454,242 Engineers I Architects I Planners .I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax Wayne Houle February 26, 2013 Page 2 This Supplemental Letter Agreement, THB, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and the SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. As always, please contact me at 952.912.2611 or ppasko(@sehinc.com with questions or comments. Thanks again for choosing SEH to provide'the City with these services. We value our relationship with the City and look forward to another exciting season of reconstruction. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. e4wld', pzewk Paul J. Pasko III, PE Project Manager Enclosures p: \ae \e \edina\ 121719 \1 - gent \10 - contracts \proposal \construction phase\revision\normandale cps seh final.dom Accepted on this _day of , 2013 City of Edina, Minnesota Name 0 LI Task Hour Budget SEH City of Edina Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction (11) Construction Phase Services February 26, 2013 [—TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $212,436.00 PAAEiMEdIna\1 Mi Oki -genhl 0wcontr6cts\PtopDsaftC6nsir q . loh P hqsel THB Norh an dale Const Phase CouncII.xIsx]THB NOTES (1) Includes hours to verify the control used by the City for the topographic survey and/or set new control if needed. (2) SEH will use the City's format for a Daily Cbhstruction Report. (3) This task assumes that the City will secure material inspection services and make these services available to SEH. Page 1 of 3 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY PROJECT TASICS. Md"DE, , C699bW 6N: PHASE SERVICES Subtotal Hours ours 1,786 iconswup ip Subtotaltfiboi Cost $204i027.18 L Provide Construction Staking Services (1 )(15) M408.82 ISubtotal ... .... S ubt ot at LA'bor.C- 6t 2.1 Provide RP R Services (2) (3) Q (14) (18) (19) Admmistrahon 3.1 'Constructioit Administration (4) (6) (7) (8) (9) (18) 12 PrbAde M-built Drawings and Service Infortnation (13) (16) (17) 3.3 Pie are Final Assessment Roll in August 2014 14 Assessment Hearing (12) ',gubt6taltaborf wt- [—TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $212,436.00 PAAEiMEdIna\1 Mi Oki -genhl 0wcontr6cts\PtopDsaftC6nsir q . loh P hqsel THB Norh an dale Const Phase CouncII.xIsx]THB NOTES (1) Includes hours to verify the control used by the City for the topographic survey and/or set new control if needed. (2) SEH will use the City's format for a Daily Cbhstruction Report. (3) This task assumes that the City will secure material inspection services and make these services available to SEH. Page 1 of 3 ESTE"TED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES Subtotal Hours ours 1,786 Subtotaltfiboi Cost $204i027.18 SUW06i SEH Eipenses (10). M408.82 ISubtotal ... .... $212,436,90 [—TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $212,436.00 PAAEiMEdIna\1 Mi Oki -genhl 0wcontr6cts\PtopDsaftC6nsir q . loh P hqsel THB Norh an dale Const Phase CouncII.xIsx]THB NOTES (1) Includes hours to verify the control used by the City for the topographic survey and/or set new control if needed. (2) SEH will use the City's format for a Daily Cbhstruction Report. (3) This task assumes that the City will secure material inspection services and make these services available to SEH. Page 1 of 3 (4) SEH will copy, fold, and provide the mailing labels for any update newsletters. City staff will insert these updates into envelopes, attach the mailing label and postage and send the updates from Engineering. (5) Assumes SEH will provide 1 RPR for 20 hours per week between 4/22/13 and 5/10/13 (3 weeks), 1 RPR for 50 hours per week between 5/13/13 and 8/16/13 (14 weeks), 1 RPR for 20 hours per week between 8/19/13 and 9/6/13 (3 weeks), and 1 RPR for 20 hours per week between 4/28/14 and 6/20/14 (8 weeks). (6) For each Application for Payment (AFP) SEH will use its format for tracking monthly quantities per City funding source, the City's format for the cover sheet of the AFP, and the SEH format for the AFP's subsequent pages. (7) SEH assumes preparation of three (3) resident update newsletters. One newsletter will be distributed after the award of the project and one (1) newsletter per each stage of the project to the entire neighborhood. These updates will be in a .docx format. These updates will include suggesting that residents subscribe to the City Extra list serve tool and a project networking account. If enough residents sign up for the list serve tool and project networking account, SEH will only prepare and submit .docx files to the City for the City to distribute to the residents using'their list serve tool. (8) Task includes scheduling and conducting a pre- construction meeting, preparing and sending the City minutes of pre - construction meeting for distribution, attending weekly on site progress meetings, preparing and sending the City minutes of those meetings for distribution, preparing applications for payments, preparing any necessary change orders, and the preparation of as -built drawings. (9) Includes hours to review shop drawings. (10) Reimbursable expenses include printing, auto allowances, mileage, and survey equipment. (11) All contractor reconstruction work shall be completed prior to November 1, 2013 except for the spring 2014 punchlist walk through. (12) Other than preparing the final assessment roll and providing technical backup during the hearing itself, SEH will not provide any other services for the assessment hearing. (13) As -built drawing requirements concerning labeling, required data, and submittal materials will follow the City of Edina record drawing procedure dated April 15, 2009. (14) RPR duties include taking digital photographs of every water service and sanitary sewer service reconstruction at the corp stop, curb stop, sanitary wye, and connection point with the existing sanitary sewer service. Shown in each digital photograph will be a time /date stamp and a dry erase board labeled with the specific address. (15) Includes hours to gather as -built information. (16) SEH will submit a .xlsx spreadsheet titled "Summary of Private Sanitary, Sewer and Water Service Pipe Reconstruction ", with column labels matching the assessment roll and additional columns detailing the information gathered for each sanitary sewer and water service pipe by the Edina Building Department and during construction by SEH. Page 1 of 1 0 7) As-built information will be provided to the City by December 6, 2013. As built information Will include.as built:pjapsheets in pdf format, spreadsheet of XYZ locates, AutoCAD file of proposed utilities line work and XYZ locates, spreadsheet titled "Summary of Private Sanitary Sewer and. Water Service Pipe Reconstruction"., copies of Edina Building Department sanitary sewer and water service pipe reconstruction notes, SEH sanitary sewer and water service pipe reconstruction notes, and the digital photographs for each address of the sanitary sewer service and water service pipes detailed above. (1 8) SEH Will use project networking communications ions suOh as twitter.com. to update the project residents, who sign 'up; about daily construction activities that may affect them. A City approved, project specific account will be set up using M-ps existing twitter account. Twitter account sign up information will be included with the resident newsletters. SEH will assign one individual to create the communications for the duration of the project to Iceep Obinhiumdations consistent: 0 9) This task includes time fora wa,&L-ou gh of the proj6d.with City staff following substantial completion. Page 3 of 3 To: Mayor and Council From: Scott Neal Date: 3/5/13 -w91�,r� o e CoRPORP`I Jess Agenda Item #: IV-1. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Request to Waive Building Permit Fee for Countryside Park Renovation Project Action Requested: Approve the request to waive the building permit fee for the Countryside Park renovation project. Information / Background: The City typically assesses and pays building permit fee for municipal building projects. I am recommending the City Council approve a request to waive the building permit fee for the Countryside Park renovation project. The building permit fee for the project is $9,800. Waiving the fee allows the City to set aside more money for potential future change orders, add more value to the project, and makes the project more affordable by reducing the overall project cost. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501^ St. • Edina, MN 55424 a ;f o e 0 Toe MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #. Iv. J. From: Lisa Schaefer, Action Staff Liaison to the Human Rights and Relations Commission Discussion ❑ Date: March 5, 2013 Information. ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2013 -02 Amending Section 1501 of Edina City Code. Action Requested: Consideration of the attached Ordinance No. 2013 -02 regarding amendments to Section 1501: Human Rights & Relations Commission, including waiving of the second reading of the Ordinance. Information / Background: At the January 22, 2013 meeting of the Human Rights and Relations Commission the Commission unanimously voted to suspend the EHRRC's membership with the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commission (LMHRC) to be revisited. next year. The EHRRC felt that the ordinance was too restrictive in identifying the specific organization (LMHRC) with which to partner. The EHRRC felt that the City would be better served with more flexible language to allow the EHRRC to partner with other agencies and organizations that share the same mission. Below are the revisions: 501.01 Policy Statement. C. Cooperate with the State Department of Human Rights, the Minneseta League of HuFnaR Rights, EenR►issieas -and other agencies and commissions in their programs of human rights. 150.1.03 Duties. C. Cooperate with the State Department of Human Rights, the State League of H_..,._., Rights /`_.........__._"_ aAd other agencies and commissions and programs that relate to the public policy stated herein. City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St. • : Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE SECTION 1501: HUMAN RIGHTS &RELATIONS COMMISSION. The City Council of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 1501.01 is amended to read: 1501.01 Policy Statement C. Cooperate with the State Department of Human Rights, and other agencies and commissions in their programs of human rights. Section 2. Subsection 1501.03 is amended to read: 1501.03 Duties C. Cooperate with the State Department of Human Rights, and other agencies and commissions in their programs of human rights. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk owe 14 0 v 9 �AV lase To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.A From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: March 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary Plat With Variances, Rodney Helm on Behalf of Miriam Kiser, 5633 Tracy Avenue, Resolution No. 2013 -26 Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. Information / Background: Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser is proposing to subdivide the property at 5633 Tracy Avenue into two lots. The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. To accommodate the request the following is required: I. Preliminary Plat; and 2. Lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. Both lots would gain access off Tracy Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 12,090 square feet, median lot depth is ,136 feet, and the median lot width is 85 feet. The new lots would meet the median area and depth, but would be just short of the median width. Planning Commission Recommendation: On February 13, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Lot Division. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2012 -26 • Draft minutes from the February 13, 2013 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, February 13, 2013 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50`" St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-26 APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH LOT WIDTH VARIANCES AT 5633 TRACY AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mr. Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser is requesting a Preliminary Plat of 5633 Tracy Avenue divide the existing parcel into two lots. 1.02 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lot 1, Block 1, Warden Acres Kiser Replat Fairfax Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.03 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels') described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Kiser Subdivision. 1.04 The proposed subdivision requires the following variances: 1. Lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. 1.05 On February 13, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat and Variances on a Vote of 8 -0. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot area and depth, and nearly meet the median width. 3. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block of Tracy Avenue. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-26 Page Two 4. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. c. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Plat and requested Variances for the proposed subdivision of 5633 Tracy Avenue. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Tracy Avenue. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-26 Page Two Adopted this _ day of , 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed.and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2013. City Clerk E. Subdivision. Kiser. 5633 Tracy Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser is proposing to subdivide the property at 5633 Tracy Avenue into two lots. To accommodate the request the following is required: . 1. A subdivision; and 2. Lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. Teague explained that both lots would gain access off Tracy Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 12,090 square feet, median lot depth is 136 feet, and the median lot width is 85 feet. The new lots would meet the median area and depth, but would be just short of the median width. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property in the same manner as the adjacent property to the east. Teague noted the condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to the Tracy Avenue area. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5633 Tracy Avenue and the lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot area and depth, and nearly meet the median width. 3. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block of Tracy Avenue. 4. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. 9 Approval is also subject to the following conditions: The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Tracy Avenue. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to- curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Appearing for the Applicant Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser and Miriam Kiser, property owner. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify how lot sizes are determined; by the average or median. Planner Teague responded it's the median. Commissioner Scherer commented that if she read the plans correctly the requested subdivision would mirror exactly the lots to its east. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Applicant Presentation Mr. Helm addressed the Commission and introduced property owner and longtime Edina resident Miriam Kiser. Mr. Helm noted that within the 500 -foot neighborhood there are 77 data sets. 22 of the lots range between 80 — 81 feet in width and eleven are at 80 feet. Mr. Helm pointed out while lot width variances are required for each lot the lots will exceed the minimum lot width requirement of 75 -feet. Mr. Helm informed Commissioners that Tracy is a 10 State road and the State indicated they have no issues with the subdivision as proposed. Helm also noted both lots are stubbed for water. Concluding, Mr. Helm asked the Commission for their support. Mrs. Kiser echoed that statement. Chair Staunton asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak to this issues; being none Commissioner Scherer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Forrest said she doesn't agree with staff that one of the practical difficulties is the oversized lot . She added in her opinion practical difficulties exist because the median lot width gets skewed by the adjoining properties; however she pointed out lot area and depth exceed the median. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved to recommend preliminary plat approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion..All voted aye; motion carried. VIII. REPORT& AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Zoning Ordina ce Update — Residential Deve ment — Ken Potts, Arlene . Forrest and Mik Platteter Commissioner Platteter introduc 0 (at the request of the Commission) c small "working group /subcommitte ' as it relates to Code issues and nsi would be to provide suggestio /reco City Council. )KIssioners Potts and Forrest reporting the three nteered late October early November to create a tackle the issues of residential redevelopment ction management. Platteter said their final goal rgendations to the Planning Commission and Commissioners Platteter, orrest and Potts dlkve a brief overview and with the aid of graphics indica/othe "we" were and where "we" are going. The following points were highlight • Held twormation gathering forums and evaluated input results. • Presentommission current zoning comparisons between Cities; noting that Edi " the more restrictive category. • As mp6tioned at the last Planning Commission meeting the themes of "concern" apptar to fall into two categories; new /remodel, home size and lot modification 11 o� e t4 a Cn Nov ffi3 �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague February 13, 2013 VILE Community Development Director File # 2013.002a 2011.015.11a INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser is proposing to subdivide the property at 5633 Tracy Avenue into two lots. (See property location on pages Al A4.) The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A6 —A17.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; and ' 2. Lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for`each lot. Both lots would gain access off Tracy Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 12,090 square feet, median lot depth is 136 feet, and the median lot width is 85 feet. (See attached median calculations on pages A8 and A16.) The new lots would meet the median area and depth, but would be just short of the median width. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property in the same manner as the adjacent property to the east. (See pages A2 —A3.) Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are single - family homes, zoned and guided low- density residential. (See page A3.) Existing Site Features The existing site contains a one story single - family home and detached garage. (See pages A3 and A5.) Both the home and garage would be removed. Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single- dwelling residential R -1, Single- dwelling district * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally acceptable. Adequate drainage and utility easements are proposed along all the lot lines. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. Sewer and water has already been stubbed to each lot. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. Primary Issue Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met with this proposal. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards -, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the 2 Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 12,090 s.f. 85 feet 135 feet Lot 1 18,748 s.f. 80 feet* 232 feet Lot 2 18,748 s.f. 80 feet*. 232 feet * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally acceptable. Adequate drainage and utility easements are proposed along all the lot lines. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. Sewer and water has already been stubbed to each lot. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. Primary Issue Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met with this proposal. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards -, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the 2 code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is due to the fact that the subject property is double the size of all lots on this block. This block was originally plated with 80 -foot lots, with the exception of the subject property. (See page A2.) The 85 -foot lot width requirement is due to wider lots further away from the subject property. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood and original plat. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of his property of which the lots would be the same as existing lots in the area. The site has utility stub connections that were installed as part of the Tracy Avenue street improvement project. (See page Al2.) b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? The condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to the Tracy Avenue area. The vast majority of the lots on Oaklawn are 80 feet wide and roughly 18,000 square feet in size. The circumstance of the oversized lot was not created by the applicant. C) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The neighborhood includes a vast majority of single - family homes on 80 -foot wide lots as proposed. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5633 Tracy Avenue and the lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. Approval is based on the following findings: Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot area and depth, and nearly meet the median width. 3. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block of Tracy Avenue. W 4. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. Approval is subject to the following conditions: The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Tracy Avenue. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. - C! A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Deadline for a City Decision: May 21, 2012 L' OGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 2 � % 7 City of Edina SWS 163408 5508 58045408 3104 5409 sloe s7o1`sros 24 5408 L-L-Lj 9h' + ^6i /{ 5109 ' 3313 a r05 340e 3500 3709 5501 5100 3501 3500 5501 3500 � �. 1 9471 a /78300 3f 24 CC Legend Highlightecl Feature Surr0un6inp House Number Labels 9904 550.7 5501 5505 7504 5105 3504 350S713S�55015300 5417 $505 634? 5704 311734 t< yyoy 5305 9412 s5oo 55oB 3709 3700 350913 S421 3110 yu V House Number Labels 551] 551! 954 5512 SS16 9317 5511 731- 7509 $51! 33,2 6316 3301 3710 3311; 3701 651- / _ 5503 3516 551-r-5526 5%4 24 5105 3111 853 Street Name Labels City Limits eN.16 yy2p 5517 am 5535 3320 5523 $13 3525 5526 3531 5521 7520 5521 33N 5509 550! 24 % 3523 3308 'Lan �:' 3524 3579 "1B 5513 5511 6117 1D 5508 1 . f 6770 1 SSe93771 �'.' Creeks Ej Lake Names 5121 3329 512 5518 �Q5 ( 6317 5838 337] 55a 5528 5529 5372 $517 5516 3N7 _ 17 ' 1 H� • 53]3 F� E 5531 6]17 5511 Lakes . Parks 3577333 S3i2 5521 3532 5313 Sam SSYS 3570 5521 532 1 ; 1 Parcels 5513.600 3605 )7 78 3541 %]0 OOtWASTER WA 3600 5805 N ; YX 9523 560 3807 J5Dp0560! Y4 s6B�56BD 3600 J60f 5e06fi SBa 560551 ( 9' 5717 37135 5605 3601 5539 5608 13 13 %i2 /5727 5 5009 5808 5612 ( 5310 %1Z 77 ; 24 55113 57105700 /2 15 3611 55165512 x38!6 550174 j I�I_ �_���5300 5313 74 n 4 5600 508 / /./) %3 (�O \re.n Pa.w / -\ 5617 3616 %f 5882 4 5729 `SB12� /B1) 5807 24 y Hawka4-I J ✓ />. 1 506pp %f7 j 3B21TS01 V 13 3621 26 T. v am "4' '5725 7053701 550955055 5513 1 ' 361 3814- 511 I J_x Bar j ,>a 361] ti5312 t 5721 \S`T 8836 -5316 553 24 /i] 56161 1 %213610 5623156N t/ • SBf %20 625 J,_D]100 5017 15711 56.42 370 3525 it 5Q3.1 .. 811.5'534 I E J 34 37013700 1 __�� -- -rK \� /6804 5629 Dr0 J�6e11 N /5008 n ; 371]: y`52D - . 5636 / . 24 / 3700 5709 s7or �-652a - ( J f 705 701 706 TOe 12 /5801 5701 , S41T 12 36)1 2 €{ f $912 5804 �5d01y f 5859 5705 5916 17381) 5704 3708 A 5808 5840 SN1 $710 8730 0700 554! (( 5714 571 36100 i589 ( 74 j t1T -21 5713 5712 I nj5M 1 j5721,1120 92079085sa %21 57067 S8N f11716� 3708 CMS 5609 3706 24 5720 3600 3708 5303430 �654f0 I n43724 18 560845900. B]2 OZB %70CS7� 3818 5937 $017 X 12 9730 7161 X5608 5724 5804 OVE ST 580,��5BOOj - {334, 55095505 $42, 171 `'800 6720 5712 s700 565 % 6 D04I Isso1 TM1172B 366, 5909 5905 5831 5 f s4sr sao01 1%05 5801 5809 5805 5804 %12 3908 5950 5824 5820 00 ^3800 %20 6816 �� B08 SBOB� 5805 24 BOD SBOB 2i 5800 5901 5518 6809't,� 58013771 A,777087)01 5817 12 I 5910 AXI OR .�- 55604 -- 3717 09 58��28 1! 5812 5917 59990559015813 5817 O8 L 1_97145712 7 5700 17 DSN 5516 3045500 381631!2 %16 2 L 4 37,6 24 512 1uw�--�'� 5824- SDpB 5e08 . 5804 ` 5900 501;' 5908 5901 5605 5800 1180 5912 16 5901 %17 9311 i 5900 -135p9 5505 552155'7 5 5419 5489 $901 3]23 3717 ir-*- 3905 59013617 `r.�16L1j0 59,20 6036 0539 904 24 �3 5fn 1 525 5005 3101 3� 59 S 5908 t is 3908 �I 1l Sy% 3913 5924 6000 16032 $618 1 5604 5570 54103412' SfOd 5612 58200�36p6� ¢317 I .512 55045500, $420 4 5816 2 $917 60o4 628 2f.. 6048 5912 6008 6028 52 940 501136005605 !77 3505 S1 13421 1 5408 1920 16001 1719 321 309 LJ,4f3 3]76 5712 3)26 2< 8011 6076 6056 $950 6000 5510 5518 33113308 5504 3500 5407 8000 7r"" ff �1 5800 x001 _ . 807H Sr W _ 34 5]2(7713 5926 8001 $005 $605 6005 �BOOJi ..naners cmres Kla0rC4CEpS 6009 oa: 6009, 5000 6008 PID:3211721130066 5633 Tracy Ave 5Sd Q Edina, MN 55436 1�u ,alb -�C�1f {1t]M1A� 1 411]11 � % 7 3377 5328 SSM 3372 SSY6 5532 3531 5336 5523 5310 537? DtY:CAS7fi7 KAY � t7rtivoR a v5 s 5381 %oo %ad 3711 3717 SM was 6604 3581 5508 am i Sam \24 $617 710 3708 5612 i 3729 W "KE5 7H1 $712 $705 3701 -� 5723 5768 r � s721 5704 a7ao . Hawk 'La a 5711 HAPIKESD1^. 5713 5705 5701 5708 1 15704 15700 1 City of Edina $321 / 3321 am % 5607 5601 Sam 5605 5604 5609 3608 MIS 5612 5617 $616 5621 5620 %25 5608 5624 %M 3637 $676 5612 %28 5672 5636 5608 5604 5640 S130 5786 5715 5613 5608 %05 5700 5709 5705 5712 5616 5612 5606 5604 5600 716 $ 5770 OROVE 57 C 9804 5601 5600 5700 5612 5609 MOS 5770 5112 5M5 a" am 5506 %20 6616 5600 w 5801 5721 5717 5711 5709 5765 5701 %13 5672 sws ban %24 LYLBCL4 %28 5632 �._�._�....— _.....,,.�........ 57125700 5704 5700 •t� C� o v n 5600 air 5605 9 5601 5604 5609 5605 .5329 %O8 3617 5609 %12 e 5518 5512 $508 5504 5616 550 5500 3305 W! PARK RD 3309 5513 5509 3508 5513 5505 T 5613 35t2 y1F 5517 5576 5521 5671 3520 5525 3811 5524 5529 24 5528 3533 5532 5537 varMn Park 5541 5545 5549 E to i 5705 24 1 caran Park aaeison 5104 3500 3(30 5709 [ PID:3211721130066 5633 Tracy Ave Edina, MN 55436 %07 5327 Q 5515 3509 5$05 >s 5803 3604 250/ 5451 5503 21 5505 3508 %17 %17 ,5510 5512 3506 3504 5500 Legend Highlighted Feature Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels 1 City Limits /.� Creaks Lake Names Lakes Parks Parcels City of Edina w � Legend Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels N City Limits �! Creeks EDLake Names ElLakes ❑ Parks ElParcels 2009 Aerial Photo 5617 x - SE r16 ye'xS _. rr f`{ 5621 S'2� Ijra�. t ice_ � ll r� v � 4 I � ? � � Y :T .y_a�:. _ • ep 5621 � S` • 5 's s'1 �, .fib . ' .A r+a nxa� .dl I 562T �.. :J '� it 7 . { t• r I •� �sf� 4 �.__,.��__ } �� > - ._ r., t►�. n 5612 56 3 ✓• x J z .. 1 £ J. _ r 1 ii Ir.,�s FJ _: �= d•o oi� ;i` 5J00 v�k ur -. `i3a 7. I- � ��s2r5 sa7�.. sw6 ar�sea5 '1 s2o6 i_. � _ y, y r 2 a - S F rC ., i J ,. •��t. wa �r...wwace,rv�._, c asm t iii PID:3211721130066 A, p 5633 Tracy Aver', Edina, MN 55436 i�.[Ll rou�gFfi �uun w � Legend Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels N City Limits �! Creeks EDLake Names ElLakes ❑ Parks ElParcels 2009 Aerial Photo ;1 � City of Edina s7s] 5s:1 g!M 3372 3713 gals Legend Sill Surrounding House Numb— 33J2 558] Bits 5177 se:s 3720 SM 5572 ya Labels 1 House Nunn be, Labels -t 31100 $645 Street Name Labels ' ✓t" ./ City Llm its "3607 71D1 3609 /� Creeks owe Se66 Sb1 (000 MAW ❑ lake Name 377 7717 371 3303 sea 8606 ;5603 St00 SW6 14 36x7 t' lak" 1' deo 617 Parks ❑ as Sea y sow t - = ED ParcNa S70o 7617 $ gels SM! -- ogle SSf7 1700 e7o6 5676 , " 5507 =06 Arlal Photo 7,18 5617 gls _ 3300 3305 773 5509 77 17 5703 e701 � _ 5611 SoM son sta 3307 Me 6679 sm —1 35u 6771 g7a l700 ss71 snr �, ul - 7sn t 1 lt37 sll6 5323 5717 S7t7 j 7677 ^t sw $324 3319 3703 3701 6676 1 sat 11 �.. 33721 WIG 7617 sea ea/6 7616 5377 H77 sm 5 7 3700 t rill ;# 3516 5770 53(9 ' 5715 0 is '8006 SQeS 8700 24 - 37a 3703,' 37/2 2705 750D 3610 5716 S6fi 17 s6a JQ01 7600 - 5700 • - -�., s +,n � it •�YF -4 . best s1a 7esl s77a sn2 sra Sits sea 3663 $515 7!03 37a ,j - • 3103 sW6 sm ls01 5M 3451 .: .. sea 3316 0370 Sits sea M Ise 7. r= 1101 3601 6771 5717 5711 5709 5703 701 uu $513 "M shoe sots i` 5617 sm - s7os u- ..�.+d,nkwscmr .;c;.ocisus sy;5712 s7a s7o+ s7a 5675 sa77 3121 sett .'i ult son ssa ssa 3306 _ PID:3211721130066 t e 5633 Tracy Ave ' tie Edina, MN 55436 � un ;1 � cXi sTIN6 A'_ .� �;, , , .. '..1 � _ .,M ... .; � as _. - . �. Wit. �� .n �: " Aw I 1(54vvi )VAt POV'J I 5633 Tracy Subdivision: Explanation of Request 5633 Tracy Avenue represents the remaining two parcels of what originally was platted as a 4 parcel site. The east 232.5 feet was subdivided off in the late 1960's into two parcels. The remaining 232.5 feet to the west has been held and occupied by the original owner. The remaining portion is 161.28 feet wide and 232.5 deep. This is identical to the east portion that had been subdivided off. There currently is a single family dwelling on the site and a detached garage. The dwelling is in need of major renovation. As mentioned, the subject property is owned by the original owner, Miriam Kiser, 85, and represents a significant portion of her retirement assets. Given the condition of the home, the break- up of value of the site has a much greater economic value than the single home /single site current configuration. Prior to this process, all early indications were that this would be a conforming subdivision. To illustrate this position, the City of Edina, during its Tracy Avenue sewer /water /street project, ran separate utilities to the new proposed site. In addition, the City also updated the water line connection to the existing home to conform with new - construction code requirements. The 'new site' sewer connection were done at the expense of the owner, representing roughly $15,000 (assessed until closing). The seller, in an effort to conserve monies, waited until there was a valid purchase agreement on the property before paying the surveyor expense to produce the needed subdivision documentation. Again, all initial conversations with the City predicted a conforming subdivision. The proposed site subdivision meets all requirements except for one condition, that being, meeting or exceeding the median lot width within the 500' defined neighborhood data set (77 properties). The proposed sites (2) meet the minimum zoning requirement of 80' width and, again, meet all other requirements. Further, the current site is somewhat of an anomaly within the 500' neighborhood being at the 99th percentile of width of the 77 sample set, 310% larger than the median lot square footage of the set and 171% deeper than the median of the set. The new proposed sites will remain 155% larger in area than median of the neighborhood set and will have the same depth as the original site. Detailed answers to the variance questions are provided later in this application. lk Attachment A: 5633 Tracy Variance Responses: The proposed Variance will: 1 Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable: YES. The subject property is the remaining two parcels of what originally was a 4 parcel sized plat. The eastern one half of the site was subdivided into two separate sites in the late 1960's. The practical difficulty faced in this process is the 500' neighborhood definition. This particular `500'- neighborhood (77 sample)' encompasses a number of sites than when platted were done with shorter depths, but during platting, to gain larger square footage, widths were increased. An example is the blocks to the south of the subject. During platting the lot subdivision changed from fronting Tracy to fronting the east -west avenues. When this was done, the developer at the time was able to subdivide roughly 6 sites to every 4 sites as platted on the subject's block platting configuration. Further, with regards to reasonable use, the new proposed sites meet the minima n lot width (80') and are 155% larger in square footage than the median of the 77 property sampling and 171% deeper than the median of said property set. 2) Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district: YES. Of the 77 property set in the defined neighborhood, 13 of the homes front Tracy. Of those 13 properties, 9 homes have a narrower width than each of the proposed sites. Further, the proposed subject sites exceed the median width of the Tracy subset which is 80 feet. Please reference attachment B. This parcel is unique and in all practical purposes represents two appropriately sized sites for the neighborhood. Only two other properties out of the 77 sample remotely have the same issue. 3) Be in harmony with the .general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance: YES. The proposed sites meet minimum lot width of the zoning area (80'). Further, the proposed sites meet both minimum lot depth and square footage. With regards to the intent or spirit of the ordinance, the proposed sites offer the approximately the same site offering of its neighboring sites and greatly exceeds both the lot depth and lot area medians (as shown in #1 above). Further, from an intent level, all preliminary indications were that these would be conforming sites. To illustrate this fact, the City of Edina during their resurfacing and sewer project, proceeded to run separate utilities to the proposed new site based upon the `spirit' of the subdivision. Only after the 500' neighborhood analysis did the narrow miss on the median width requirement arise. 4) Not alter the essential Character of the neighborhood: YES. Looking further into the data set of the 77 properties as the defined in the 500' neighborhood, the proposed subdivision actually brings the proposed sites more in line with the typical sites. Currently, lot width of the subject is at the 99`h percentile of the 77 property set and post subdivision. The new sites will be wider than 31 of the 77 sites (401h percentile) and within 3/4 inch of width of 5 more sites in set, placing the property at proximately at the 47 "h percentile when treating these additional 5 parcels as comparable sites. This is shown in Attachment B. LPN C1� �7 Attachment B: 5633 Tracy Subdision: Width sample details Sample Width Notes: 1 50 2 75 3 75 4 75 5 75 6 75 7 75 Subset: Tracy lot widths 8 75 75 9 75 75 10 75 76 11 75 75 12 75 80 13 75 121.8 14 76 78 15 78 80 16 80 80 17 80 80.7 18 80 80.7 19 80 80 20 80 93 21 80 80 median on Tracy 22 80 23 80 24 80 25 80 26 80 27 80 28 80 29 80 30 80 31 80.6 32 80.7 80.64 proposed lot width (between 31 and 32 sampling units, 40 percentile of samle set) 33 80.7 within 3/4 of inch ' 34 80.7 within 3/4 of inch 35 80.7 within 3/4 of inch 36 80.7 within 3/4 of inch 37 84 38 85 exceeds 31 out of the 77 within 314 of inch of 5 more 39 85 40 85 41 85 42 85 43 85 44 85 45 86.9 46 88 47 88 48 89 49 90 50 90 51 90 52 90 53 90 54 90 55 90 56 90 57 90 58 90 59 91 60 93 61 93 62 93 63 93 64 93 65 93 66 93 67 93 68 93 69 93 70 95 71 100 72 100 73 103 74 104 75 110 76 120 121.28 Current subject is 99 percentile of sampling set 77 121.8 Average 85.633766 Median 85 A�- ,. �`,� -_of � Cyr` +P �,'''n" •_,�r�.. l JAN 2 2012 CITY OF 5633 Tracy Subdivision: Explanation of Request 5633 Tracy Avenue represents the remaining two parcels of what originally was platted as a 4 parcel site. The east 232.5 feet was subdivided off in the late 1960's into two parcels. The remaining 232.5 feet to the west has been held and occupied by the original owner. The remaining portion is. 161.28 feet wide and 232.5 deep. This is identical to the east portion that had been subdivided off. There currently is a single family dwelling on the site and a detached garage. The dwelling is in need of major renovation. As mentioned, the subject property is owned by the original owner, Miriam Kiser, 85, and represents a significant portion of her retirement assets. Given the condition of the home, the break- up of value of the site has a much greater economic value than the single home /single site current configuration. This subdivision requests separating the remaining 161.28 by 232.5 ft parcel into two equally sized parcels, with frontage on Tracy Avenue. Each site will be 80.64 feet wide. .' T, G vi OF NAN A �( NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION Re: Kiser Subdivision 5633 Tracy Ave., Edina, IMN 55436 To Whom it may Concern: This notice is being sent to all single - family property owners within 500 feet of the property proposed for subdivision pursuant to the City Ordinance Number 810. The property proposed for subdivision is located at 5633 Tracy Ave., Edina, Minnesota. The Property is legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Warden Acres Kiser Replat, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The proposed subdivision consists of dividing the existing parcel into 2 Lots. The contact person for this subdivision is Rod Helm and can be contacted by mail at Rod Helm 3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Telephone number: 952 - 924 -6246 The proposal will be considered by the Edina Planning Commission on Wednesday, February 13, 2013, at 7:00 pm, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 West 50th Street. If you desire more information pertaining to the public heating schedule or subdivision process please feel free to contact the City of Edina Planning Departments at (952) 826- 0369. Sincerely, Rod Helm Alb '� �i /i/�ri t7i ii• -ni /i I i•r far - -nl nl r �i r nnrrlr rll. - door srll \ I 916.4 , I I 930.0 I 't 1 I I .' {.• �I: -ra{`• �i!� fl w, of stole border l 909.6 ' \I ,� I I 'l.'a•.j�;y;.; .'�'Is4 t• � .i . "35.0 91�.BxI \x �� �� - -� I 9/2./ �09li #z S 89 °51'45" E 232.50 I 6 D .. J_ '1 I a corl er•ote.: ', ;�' • 9 -4 '.I: �' mh i„ _ \ 9 5•.• ;r<.,• 4.9 '' .. � ' 2�'. . 91~1`4` I II 1 t I wall Fop/ / ' ;;4ya9e - _ •: flaw O Fra?le `a, .3• 913.5/ / clothes poke _ J nm 9 1.50 1 o �\ BYdge' `22.0 ', Irly- 69 /.38WS u>v°900.04N 1 m I 1 +9/63 .91G.01 '.gin:• - �I ```� I 1 1 / FSbs `V �F I •N 1 / ' i•.0 �` �I I �I \ 1 / , W / r a'u•• ,• • r�r�r -•i • r�r- i I31.. r -t1j1 II e 1r .ir . -,- / - n• "c: I /I/ rt F// It - / \/ /1 Fr / h- i 14 , •. h._l 1 fYY -F�l rr I w • I 1 1,7 \ I u 1 1 � •. steel s1 /l '' '' a Overhang' s 15.+' Utility Fasemen I 7. 1 �9j16.1 I I � concrete dd 39.8\1%\'\'\ 9/7.2 y � 3P7 I n .3\ -J`-t0 ry Frame I a/c umr I Wp foundatron " ui y -Y' - -- N 00.7 9/6.6 No 5FE 3 I ® ❑concontenna \ I L n `28.6 `O 929.1 I pad v CQ (� I 9/6.4 \40.3 -916.0 a lhyl I 1 �\{I ,Y- W/ top I / 1 w/anchor N� X914.9 I spy laalst 2P ,t+ 915.3 ` 9� �' / •• i / I I I 1 !edge //q n ,,,(/a'�i basal I �.I of erig>Rg end of fencdol lard I over hw2't / r f , I I catch in,,r =905.93, I �' n c e / 3- ' nds-r n \ 1909.2 / _=t J �_ ��,opa�7n�- IP_�Yy-NC- �Y1- - W- - - 9NF-- ✓G•WfL- 2t7 W w>.f- ti 49 / -�'7 fldhtY' P °-le= i Y -W I nSErl - -W-W OV-d wares _ _ _5J'1pJL LBL L I ,i ----------- Note: Adchhanal block t+plrs n M area - - - - - - 3 \ 909.3x I 909.6 s 9/0.3 fie. 924.3a 39.0 I _..:I top Pak 910.2 909.5 923.3 ' I I top fafrndWzon. top foundabon 9/0.8 I 6 roafP=k 925.8 l ra f LEGEND .- � "•Z- -- Oaofe Gvatmj C�tor O O otc 4m Mmmart Sd ya� emotes Iron Monument F..d mac r5ht ¢ ltydr:nt J7 P Poe O � Gtdr Eavna O -w-w- O,riheadtwo -< a- saamaysanlr -a-a- 9mmaeuwv -r -.,- wt- -at -a- Gal Mme - - - ra, Lear tsRtteeeer &dde Lnee avuto -aft of ro adprrnt 5-& SHEET_INDEX Shpt 1- EXLGAI p CarAW=Scary Shpt 2 -Pml dmay Plx Shret 3- R -1 L•tn W Mn 5W feet,fSAae P .Short 4- Gr•d1M, Drag., UU:4 aItl Trey F r' ° trabelh.ervmex® L -J I,I ILLJ =s; I -J I �s; I �T- I R HAWKE5 TERRACE i L -, I L -, I :i I L � �LJ ;s; I •;i I I - I -T• I -1- I I w w Q 60 60 ! -Story Frame No.5629 / vl/ /i 1r-r I i� -- I� /ai � err �- - � y- - l �la� I'll i rvi lY�l 1 � /! �Y I/ -1 1 1 L/ L_ I Y / -1 l/ 1 1 L_ ,/ ! 1 L_ ! Y! Y. ♦/ \/ , I I I I Y 1 Y, S 89 051'45" E 232.50 N 89 °51'48" W 232.50 I -_ i I I I I I Prame I ' I Garage I I I I I I• I ! -Story Frame No.56/2 ` -Story Frame I I / _ Prame No.561 6 I (house faces south) I No.5608 (house faces south) , - - al , _(h ) _(house 560 south) nn /I #%,I lrr -1 N T Y: W' d• 0 0 0 0 cn .f PROP05ED UTILITY $ DRA EA,5EMENT5 ARE SHOWN I I Imo` 51. - -i I- - - -- O O Being 5 feet In width and ad,10 lot lines and 10 feet in width adjoining right of way Imes SHEET ME)( Shad I - ExEung Gm==SmY Sham R- P.UttA -YPW Shad S -R -1 lnla wi0Yn 500(" Shad <- GrWim, Ordmptl. UUI ' ' 1 Ll� 60I ♦ I M� n!— IIR -1W — nae It — a— S— S —S —S —S Id manhole HAWKES nm =9/ 1.50 -1 o 2 Fpp F m 691.36W,5 w TLI\/V 'l C 1rrv=900,04N I CI PROPOSED SERVlr.6 �i I ZI I II j. L j o -i, I 60 I8c Iroof peak 1 II 930.0 I -Story Frame ...I... _ . on ofaf n (:. :( -' I ': ' ` , N0.5629 971.1 border over knee `I ' 909.6 arr�ge, n 1..• 3S0 9/4.7 I `, cancreta l ♦ 1 I yE \ 1 I • '_ \ 69+-,0 1 nn /Z.-•• - _ _ � `, I I \ A ave o enorAU rn r 1 SILT FENCE p // e� ra10� -Vt• � c4 � o ruo9 -- / / -ntm rasc V Ica. Ivl l -story Frame No.56 / 6 (house faces south) INLET PROTECTION STD. 2'X3' STORM STRICTURE D= 1110 s1DRtr CASW ^ top founded 9/0.6 I r��r�- �•re\rr f- ri �- 1 1 1 r / 1 1 � 1 / 11 1 \ 1 I CO � \ I 1\ Ltil \ I I 910.2 l -Story Frame I roP rD "maw Dn No.56/2. 9/0.6 (house faces south) I I - tofy Frame - a k No. 5608 al r ♦(house faces south) ll /I /I I\ll /'Fr RDCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE I- OA rm,r - Aa,, -- CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1- CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL F EXCAVATION. (DIAL 811) 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO CONS? 3. PROTECT ANY EXISTING STREET CATI WITH INLET PROTECION DEVICES. 4. AFTER EXISTING DRIVEWAY REMOVAL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ACCESS FOR: rAl1•WPE,'Ol,m Gopher State C 'IeLfl� 14007gi166 GOVERNING SPECIFICA 1- The 2005 edition of the Minnesota Depar Transportation - Standard, Specifications and the City of Edina's Specifications. 2. The latest edition of the Minnesota Man. Traffic control devices. 3. The Islas edition of the City Engineers As Minnesota Standard Specifications. r LEGEND %-'�• -- D-axs a,sh,d uemw 0 rap dC rn. 0 D=wt- e9„ Mrncaaart sa, • D, a k- M-o Fw �P— P.Ib 0 • Cot,* goon O F- -W W— or.*.&wc --a —Q- seam,.9ksa -a —eu- Gas Man tcciem t< &d&v tins 0 c m r sire Sac® D-tta- b-aa4r d.-- Darot a e sarq 7rcs eo a. SHEET INDFX Shoot 1 • E eunq Shoal 3 - Prollmh sheet 3 -R•1 lm meal a -G Aq 1 1 ♦ I I 1 1 1 1 i I I I 1 r 1 1 r I 1 1 I Satcfi basin I / 1 rYn= 905.931 1 "17903.070 909.2 ♦ - - ' - overlrvd I 910.2 l -Story Frame I roP rD "maw Dn No.56/2. 9/0.6 (house faces south) I I - tofy Frame - a k No. 5608 al r ♦(house faces south) ll /I /I I\ll /'Fr RDCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE I- OA rm,r - Aa,, -- CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1- CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL F EXCAVATION. (DIAL 811) 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO CONS? 3. PROTECT ANY EXISTING STREET CATI WITH INLET PROTECION DEVICES. 4. AFTER EXISTING DRIVEWAY REMOVAL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ACCESS FOR: rAl1•WPE,'Ol,m Gopher State C 'IeLfl� 14007gi166 GOVERNING SPECIFICA 1- The 2005 edition of the Minnesota Depar Transportation - Standard, Specifications and the City of Edina's Specifications. 2. The latest edition of the Minnesota Man. Traffic control devices. 3. The Islas edition of the City Engineers As Minnesota Standard Specifications. r LEGEND %-'�• -- D-axs a,sh,d uemw 0 rap dC rn. 0 D=wt- e9„ Mrncaaart sa, • D, a k- M-o Fw �P— P.Ib 0 • Cot,* goon O F- -W W— or.*.&wc --a —Q- seam,.9ksa -a —eu- Gas Man tcciem t< &d&v tins 0 c m r sire Sac® D-tta- b-aa4r d.-- Darot a e sarq 7rcs eo a. SHEET INDFX Shoot 1 • E eunq Shoal 3 - Prollmh sheet 3 -R•1 lm meal a -G Aq M '`' datrN I i I 8I6A I, w o� •2; I i - :II 99x0 II I I L'a_II�: M'.. •1.' 9l F.E. � 1 `t I r i �l, �� qi I . „_ \ _ - � S 89 °51'45° • J' I 910 0 %Y3/aC d"F/ 9/ 130 ne•�E9 /3Ea'3 I I 9EI$ `�'9. ``�' \I I; \ 916. HA WKF.5 11T k- TERRACE Z w ` I - � ` "F vm� P N I ° ° d" :!•• . Ore rgenq i /3.F � 1111 I '/ ].l •, �l-$LOry ftr .o I std 1 I 1�}1 I,sQ]I 1 —�- - -_ LEGEND 916.6 b NO m I ® a�etQmu dl it I It}I 11ge'0.+,, I /` deGM� �- I X40 1 . 'J I I �I � \ kaee 2]•` %� 4JIJ3 /r / / / � I! � I I � ` \\ �� Em.9.. I �9 r j �dad9rl r'�/ I I� f�'bwr I eMdlxCm ins I I e�903D7. Y r1809.Y \ \. —_ Q P®eerPdtimemyoeedl •Y_ m '' yY= nom• -acv rb �v 91 - __ •� I 1 ' 0.3 --_AdJhvW Nrl qao ntloti �_ I\ It, - -t- - - - - -- - - - -- I 8 I910.9 i r -9xa I I \9093 8293 'I I fi���Ci " "' /un}mm 9294 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 -72!n.- EEEMSTING ONDITIONS SURVEY FOR r EXISTING CONDITIONS KISER SUBDIVISION Far. Miriam Wser 5633 Tmcy Ave. EQian, NIN 55436 CERTIFICATION lb ap ®! tlene a qm IIY J.em° r YYmm°n PmImC b Yw Imp /MVrpr\ may aigetmwm°dgrimautlm.mdte aweb Wemsn NI w. W UrnmlmaMnmmtl°E.Im Y W eCba LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LAND SIYiYEI'OR9 ]Wl rJao —U. 9aO014YN PAFK W 16GIS Irr ��� r rmcLS r gO2it Sheet 7 of 4 NOTES: Pmpuaoeaac SeDTIwyM -ray ea+ ssw Pm°myle.meemnrmmmaa\nm -ISOass rrmw ]a+lz WoNlouno . al (wW. a..aoa w LLOId) PmP...armas,od.mn•an lsm. w.anuwml� x•Flru Y�C baly gleWv2gma 9a. Ymt vabal0 MW-ftlqlOM1R W mNaW W >YS6 D qet iml mu r"wmb - nwr wq lase ma Tad H.dmm.)iwni8 AnadPoml•Awl Ra ➢�gadH.dmly � Ian P�.,b l.w.a "]a. a•. e....m.q.em.n,a. P..raa/�n� No. zrmJawe�a, wawa amr m egPL z xml. gdekTgr•/qJe.aSamdLaq .' Legal Description ra L, Olxk 4 W.de,e®Ir;,r agdn,Hw°p,Gwq, N9mm4 EXISTING CONDITIONS KISER SUBDIVISION Far. Miriam Wser 5633 Tmcy Ave. EQian, NIN 55436 CERTIFICATION lb ap ®! tlene a qm IIY J.em° r YYmm°n PmImC b Yw Imp /MVrpr\ may aigetmwm°dgrimautlm.mdte aweb Wemsn NI w. W UrnmlmaMnmmtl°E.Im Y W eCba LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LAND SIYiYEI'OR9 ]Wl rJao —U. 9aO014YN PAFK W 16GIS Irr ��� r rmcLS r gO2it Sheet 7 of 4 �J I -- I -a I I I . I o HAK KF5 TERRACE I _ I I I I _ I _ I I U4 J 2 Q U Go Go l.5tory frame No.5629 N N PROPOSED LMLr Y 6 DRAINAGE EA5EMENT5 ARE SHOWN THU5: - 51 L- 5..q mg 5 ke m wdth aMad�anvtg W hno and lO At m wdIh a,M adjoamlg nght of wry Imp ice. - JAN � SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 60 EET..y INARY PLAT 77 N 89 °51'48° W 232.50 I I I FF NOTES: I I I I . I F�RIe I. I Garage I Pmpury Mtra�eel]Tng4w_F®u,eN Belle PiopvplCmeOmlbn]8n0r. v- 11]31 -t]CCB I I . I I I 1 •SLO/Y Pfame I r /StoF:C I No.5612 I I_ Flame N0.5G I G fnonee hcp eotltll I I 8 n f-c— � �>owv Im PROPOSED LMLr Y 6 DRAINAGE EA5EMENT5 ARE SHOWN THU5: - 51 L- 5..q mg 5 ke m wdth aMad�anvtg W hno and lO At m wdIh a,M adjoamlg nght of wry Imp ice. - JAN � SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 60 EET..y INARY PLAT 77 PRELIMINARY PLAT KISER SUBDIVISION For. Miriam Kiser 5633 TV A— RUN MN 66438 OERTFlGTION Ibeb'.�bea elmp.smn®tr�pwm NneG IaiE'�H� gal.4trr�..app.l9] ' demas�Nf Ye.Y1Y.mY11moJ OW1981teap• .AIx n tro,< Mn AG LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LAND SURVfiY0R5 ]em nim PARK. AVl AVETK M eeOeNLYN 6e1x0 ]m-0e0.1e9]peone ]014e04U31a .�fp. ®ems. r 1e5619 .a BOexl Sheet 2 of 4 FF NOTES: Pmpury Mtra�eel]Tng4w_F®u,eN Belle PiopvplCmeOmlbn]8n0r. v- 11]31 -t]CCB ' 0mW xaao tYVeuen -Rt (aq. � ueeY99'+) wpna xn+m tram :Rt leh9e o.mow O.9!W Pse�.E eaebn 9e0svt¢ FlvYYN Maptl�9sea OLYVk Vab�tN43.Ye.Ietle6W mYM1N� Rm Ya¢ x9Ytl Ttl4 /]n d Plap�l] • Al9] g2l4Ae mre) TmImMVWPadm l.t -x Im Lax - tmu w.e ttwermiatwm9v tllltm eNar. rmlvex Oom.re.e BL IOLPUY,MN 651n Mm�ede xmaet.r.erat su. tw IA�.Iw 9slte 9na. P.mml.ele m... -otmw Legal Description ta. L BlarY 4 wudm Mxn Km RW W. Nrmp^G..4. Mv.rm PRELIMINARY PLAT KISER SUBDIVISION For. Miriam Kiser 5633 TV A— RUN MN 66438 OERTFlGTION Ibeb'.�bea elmp.smn®tr�pwm NneG IaiE'�H� gal.4trr�..app.l9] ' demas�Nf Ye.Y1Y.mY11moJ OW1981teap• .AIx n tro,< Mn AG LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LAND SURVfiY0R5 ]em nim PARK. AVl AVETK M eeOeNLYN 6e1x0 ]m-0e0.1e9]peone ]014e04U31a .�fp. ®ems. r 1e5619 .a BOexl Sheet 2 of 4 E60b •' ?5 Ld Waaa dmm tram Rumapb Cdq T=R® Lot VNatr WO DWh W ddwftUdb/ do C$' d EdWa ft&M ndwn118amon550d DWCD) Code Lm Wavmlan Dun NWn4M Ontly HO Sawm ILA oer..ng wA� o.I .- o.p.orya agrTCws R•1 LOTS WRNIN 500 FEET OF PROPOSED KISSER SUSDMSION Miriam Kiser 6577 Tleoy Am EdbA MN 554M KISER SUBDIVISION Fw. Miriam IGser 5077 T.W A- EdLM MN 55475 CERtIFlCATION Ie..er�. r...Cpmrie..resbr=.m. amr is ww: ��h. ��+ •r wn r Ie�rs ueu orblm.v e Ir.wzm °1r'^ LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LAlda bURITnAg9 1011510AVEMItre mWRNI pAlai W aam fad 1Odm]m fMw v Imis Sheet 3 or 4 NOTES: Haag Aaeas ®TO 1 E" W wua phpW laW�.aelane.: atlral.om 6-4--a OObro.•M Mo. O.ft lMUmm 1.p�dT..ha O.meo- A.��ttl� fm1 ar Nl Ta! Nw.mlJdm h4PlPhraYby r ra atr TeI Ana r qqp. au] M Paa e.a {rodm bell�hamWTanma. 4YhmaILYpOaam�e.eNb�rpililrW ■ach a.aamrbt>d� trhhmY.aCldyhn.epwammWy. a..�anarryr..0r�r9.a srTS �� Legal D- .dptlon W I.lam•4 V.etoA® IOC/gt4t Nq• C­� KISER SUBDIVISION Fw. Miriam IGser 5077 T.W A- EdLM MN 55475 CERtIFlCATION Ie..er�. r...Cpmrie..resbr=.m. amr is ww: ��h. ��+ •r wn r Ie�rs ueu orblm.v e Ir.wzm °1r'^ LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LAlda bURITnAg9 1011510AVEMItre mWRNI pAlai W aam fad 1Odm]m fMw v Imis Sheet 3 or 4 •� I i I s,.1..,,,. :;� /- 5tory Frame >.me -------- I CONSTRUCTION NOTES I. /. No.562.9 ..�.�.. 91R.d� , 1. COMACT OOPIERBTATE 0181 G,LPWOaTOMr/ I - -__� ,, 11 1 18UTALL8LLT fENOEPWDIIIOm •'(W101,011 S 186.5 45' E 232.50 lag' — — — > -- — uraleASaa i •.-' ---------------- - - - - -- - _------------------- — ------ 1'uerPY° __. I I �/I� L'•l 1'�-f I 91'S/� Mw ` - -_� 1 I A�EIOBfWO0WV6NAY W310VK YSTNl _J I 19 /!tl � I T E3 i ' —`— __ - -- ; 11 NBRtWiWNA0069f9a6IIEIr�H ' P Gophrr State One Call / d' ' ji ; I 9 /LO I I `O _ T om. •I . ; , HAWKES , L 1 m 1 _ won 37.0, TERRACE I 1I Y ���I fT s `I —Y i \ ¢', i GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS • i ItmrWeD9EVVlCL9 ° �� I ' c I, /5.� uaty } 1\ ` I 1_ y ' I ` /LI I I I I r0 ` ,. 18aTaarpe,n8•°�0°° oleumrla pepv�ml�N �, ly \ ,�1 MFA,uY Bp•tllomn. —,•_J / - - -- I 1 , 1 —� —�� 1Th•N/n,eAhn Wa,•MMm•h lAmuYal WJlnm I , / 7 I ` I I rlr raY� � , � `I / I�1110 I♦ ]. TM hlo WnmNPe tl4'FnOnem NwL6wN J i, 9.5Y ``I 11 1 �' 1♦ I YI°nuu. 9mtlo18PeN.alwu I Z 1� efl I I P r -___ —_ I� \ ►' � ' 1 /tlC•pcy I �p `_l• IIRR Ep ' I © 1 `!V7 q � M.9 • I I 1 T ' 1 �] LEGEND •J I a� y s• -� - 1 �J /59 Le�O tom', I G ' i/ /j •i I ' , \, V �avmI//�� /; r-99n ylt23230 _ • 4® 9/01 - A'da+MUlrad Na�gonllo nee -__- Q -t - -- - -- - -- -' I I °,eP:"` I !•Story Frame I F«��i - -" o�n frX� ,�d„e n�,,.,,�,.. 1-5toryfiame 5612. No.561 6 910'0 Roux hco 9oatlJ I !- o.5 Framc 9�23e ( f c 3oar1J I I f—ee r,(hDloe (acc93OULhd .i, .._._. ,a_• ill, , i>t:, ...,, SLT rpirF L.i.M PEES IDUI 1161 od0, -,/rmq SiD. 21S Sfmal B1W1L1180= +arn� ' rm,x o]rr]Iloe ro c'uame/m61 sre e...:mr.rm...u.ar.rm, vc wam mn GRADING FIM LOT RCY •F � I 1 soosr � iS • mar lam w mu6mmx .mma ate) mw I I n.r�rm.° ovum ,n n -]oer me.� 4. nmimnl m ns mo m vor. O many Oe,mi, SCALE IN FEET 3 rReer 0 20 40 60 GRADING, DRAINAGE, UTILITY .EE PLAN Miriam Kiser 6933 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55439 NOTES: Rryaq Atlaea 6811TSyba., rayuN ssme nevnv,am»m rmmc AI1T3, -1)068 � xmay Omfo]m -RI [and• OMOne00Y1W PmpaW Zmim Chmabo'm -RI l8ty Oavmp Itl OIOW amN•G a4M°een•eK �r.m Ara.a.a.4cmmn° Yuk Vale am Hausa NYNPrutnihmN aerYW: ZB YY T°IalNUtln °NT•TKr•W InLU�) TOIY WmBrolalapmr0l°b•2 /w rlpr°per•d lan Id, - m°e •4n — Tq,m°rebmnma�ar 1 r�er.mv.mm ,�•� W..•eeo • mn 6u Legal Description Im L ebh 401edmA® K,.: BgJn.Nmv,mn Cnm9. ]1'v°mu GRADING, DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND TREE PLAN KISER SUBDIVISION F, Miriam Kiser 5633 Tracy A- .rT Edinn• MN 65436 1t1 CERTIFICATION r `�\ TbO 'omelm.•e ®°`nasmCVbmsluPmMCaeLn w.wm eamin°�wu®,a LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LWD SUFYaY0ai4 r86 T]aBAYeNVE N B W ]ONLYN PAW(, 14N BNrO amr,n xa]4awuz m Nauemvvwr ram 105610 owu.m 80811 i + Sheet 4 of 4 Page 1 of 2 Helm, Rod M From: Sherman, Tod (DOT) [Tod.Sherman @state.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 2:03 PM To: Helm, Rod M Subject: RE: 5633 Tracy Avenue, Edina, Subdivision Rod: Thanks for sending in the plans. MnDOT has no problems with the proposed lot split. Thanks, Tod Tod Sherman, Planning Supervisor Mn /DOT Nletro District 1500 W. County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 234 -7794 tod.sherman @state.mn.us From: Helm, Rod M [mailto:RHelm @CBBURNET.COM] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:19 PM To: Sherman, Tod (DOT) Subject: 5633 Tracy Avenue, Edina, Subdivision Tod Sherman MN Department of Transportation Metro District Dear Tod, Thanks for your time on the phone today. As discussed, please find the following attachments regarding the proposed subdivision of 5633 Tracy Avenue in Edina: 1) Application for subdivision 2) Plat of current site 3) Proposed site subdivision plat Thanks again. Let me know if you need anything else. Rod He1_al CRS, GRI, rEALTOR 2013 A-Eick7v E /a. /, jIIIN Assoc of Realtors Voted r4.lpls/St Paid it fag. "Super Agent ", '03 -'12 CBB lrrto mtzoral Aaident's Cirle Coldwell Banker Bumet 3033 Excelsior Blvd. Slilie # 100 MinneapoUs, N IN 55416 952.924.6246 (work) 61%.720.9792 (cell) 612.920.4706 (fax) .Licensed agent in YIN rhelm(&, cbburnet.com 2/5/2013 hl� To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: John Wallin, Finance Director Date: February 5, 2013 of e ► '` - A Agenda Item #: VI. B. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Consider Resolution No. 2013 -25 Approving the Issuance of Obligations By the City of Lilydale, Minnesota to Finance A Project By Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis Action Requested: Hold public hearing and consider Resolution No. 2013 -25 Approving the Issuance of Obligations by the City of Lilydale, Minnesota to Finance a Project by Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis Information I Background: Calvin Christian School issued taxable debt in 2008 for construction of an addition to the school. The School approached the City Council in March of 2008 to request the issuance of conduit debt. The City Council turned down the proposal at the time and the school issued taxable debt instead. Calvin Christian School recently approached staff concerning the issuance of tax- exempt conduit debt utilizing the City of Edina to refinance its taxable debt Staff believes there is a potential that the City could issue debt approaching the $10,000,000 limit for bank qualified debt, therefore, Calvin Christian School could not issue bank qualified debt through the City of Edina. Calvin Christian School has begun negotiations with several banks and the City of Lilydale for the issuance of tax- exempt bank qualified debt, however, as the project was within the City of Edina, The Edina City Council would need to hold a public hearing for the City of Lilydale to issue the debt The attached resolution was drafted by Calvin Christian School's Bond Counsel Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith and Frederick, PA.. A letter from the School's consultant Steve Fenlon of Midwest Healthcare Capital with introductory remarks regarding the Calvin Christian School request for the public gearing is also attached. The City would have no financial responsibility with the issuance of the debt being proposed. Attachment: Letter from Midwest Healthcare Capital, Calvin Christian, School's consultant, with introductory remarks regarding their request for a public hearing. Resolution No. 2013 -25 Approving the Issuance of Obligations by the City of Lilydale, Minnesota to Finance a Project by Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 ti REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION MHC Nonprofit Tax- Exempt Finance Specialist 2042 Charlton Ridge W. St. Paul, Minnesota 55118 Office (651) 455 -8300 Cell (651) 308 -0949 Email: st evens midwesthealthcarecapital.com To: John Wallin Cc: Randy Kroll From: Steve Fenlon Date: 1/23/13 Re: Introductory remarks regarding CCS request for public hearing Calvin Christian School ( "CCS ") has operated its school at its present site for more than 50 years. CCS is organized (under the auspices of the IRS) as a 501(c)3, nonprofit corporation as a school. As such, and subject to the close scrutiny of bond counsel a study has been undertaken to review the 2007 construction expenditures specifically allocating the costs to the spaces which serve as educational, administrative and athletic to ensure no issue with the "separation of church and state." Page 2 As a qualifying nonprofit CCS has a right to access tax - exempt financing for qualifying spaces and original construction costs. CCS and Midwest Healthcare Capital have requested and obtained lending proposals from three area banks: one has been selected as the most attractive and a commitment is expected in the next few days. Refinancing at this juncture with low interest rates further reduced due to the tax- exempt, bank - qualified loan structure makes eminent sense in helping CCS continue to offer private school educations at reasonable tuition rates and still pay teaching staff a livable wage. CCS consulted with the City of Edina several months ago and learned at that time, the City intended to issue more than $10 million in bonds in 2013, which would prevent CCS' note from receiving a bank - qualification designation. Since that designation is commonly a requirement in order to attract a bank lender, and since CCS has structured its offering assuming a bank lender, it pursued another issuer under the MN statute which allows for a nexus issuer, that is a community for whom its citizens benefit from the availability of the educational opportunities offered to students at CCS. The City of Lilydale has tentatively agreed to issue the note, of course subject to a public hearing being held by the City of Edina and the adoption of a resolution by the Edina City Council expressing the Council's consent. Therefore, we hereby request that the City of Edina hold the mandatory jurisdictional public hearing, and after that hearing and during the same meeting, consider and approve a resolution instructing the City of Lilydale to issue its tax - exempt, bank - qualified note which will refinance the existing long term indebtedness of Calvin Christian School. The City of Edina's role in this transaction does not call for it to actually issue the note but is rather limited to holding a public hearing and directing the City of Lilydale to issue its note. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Calvin Christian School (campus does not include a church) has been a solid citizen in Edina and has provided an educational alternative to the citizens of Edina and south Minneapolis. CCS thanks the City of Edina for considering this request and expects that the City will take this step (one which does not result in risk or cost to the City) in recognition to the contributions CCS has made in assuring a broad and diversified educational opportunity to the citizens of Edina. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION NO. 2013-25 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF OBLIGATIONS BY THE CITY OF LILYDALE, MINNESOTA TO FINANCE A PROJECT BY CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF MINNEAPOLIS Page 3 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council (the "City Council ") of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01 Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis (the "Borrower ") located at 4015 Inglewood Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation and organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") desires to refinance taxable indebtedness incurred for the activities described below and a portion of the costs asssociated with the refinancing: Improvements to the kindergarten through eighth grade, 180 - student, school campus located at 4015 Inglewood Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota, which it owns and operates, consisting of (a) constructing and equipping an 8,600 square foot addition to the existing main school building to provide a new lobby, media center (incorporating a library, computer lab, office and conference room), office suite (including a reception area, three administrative offices, a nursing office, a workroom and two single -stall restrooms); (b) constructing and equipping a 1,075 square foot addition to the west building to provide including a new entryway, a hallway and boys' and girls' restrooms; and (c) related renovation to existing areas to provide a staff room, a learning resource room and a tutoring room (the "Project "). 1.02 It is anticipated that the refinancing will be pursuant to an issue of tax- exempt obligations to be purchased by a lending institution which will require that such obligations be designated by the issuer thereof as "qualified tax exempt obligations" under Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Each issuer of "qualified tax exempt obligations" is limited to issuance of not more than $10,000,000 of such obligations during each calendar year, whether designated or not. 1.03 It is anticipated that the City will issue obligations in calendar year 2013 in an amount in excess of $10,000,000 to finance its own projects. 1.04 The City of Lilydale, Minnesota (the "Issuer ") has agreed to issue tax- exempt bank qualified revenue obligations, in one or more series, in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 (the "Obligations ") to finance the Project. The Obligations will be issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165 as amended, relating to municipal industrial development (the "Act "). 1.05 Minnesota Statues, Section 471.656 provides that a municipality may not issue obligations to finance the acquisition or improvement of real property located outside of the REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 corporate boundaries of the issuer unless the municipality in which the real property to be improved is located consents to the issuance of such obligations. .1.06 The tax exempt bond provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, require that each jurisdiction containing a project to be financed with tax exempt obligations hold a public hearing on the issuance. Section 2. Public Hearing Held. 2.01 An initial resolution was adopted by the Council on February 5, 2013, scheduling a public hearing on the issuance of the Obligations and the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. 2.02 A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Edina Sun Current, the City's official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation, calling a public hearing on the proposed issuance of the Obligations and the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. 2.03 The City Council has, on March 5, 2013, held a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance, through the issuance of the Obligations by the Issuer, the portion of the Project located within the jurisdictional limits of the City, at which all those appearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted. Section 3. Approvals. 3.01 The issuance by the Issuer of the Obligations to refinance the Project is approved. 3.02 The Mayor and the Clerk, or the authorized designee of any of the foregoing, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver such other documents or certificates needed by the Issuer from the City for the sale of the Obligations. Section 4. Limited Obligation. The Obligations, when and if issued for the Project, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Issuer or the City. (There will, however, be a charge, lien or encumbrance on the Project, which is not an asset of the Issuer or the City.) The Obligations, when and if issued, shall recite in substance that the Obligations and the interest thereon, are payable solely from revenues received from the Project and property pledged for payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the Issuer or the City. Passed and adopted by the City Council on March 5, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 5 I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 5, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 6 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meetmg''of the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, was duly called and.held at the City Hall located at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, ti Minnesota, on Tuesday, March 5, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: and the following members were absent: MOTION: Member moved to adopt Resolution No. , entitled "Resolution Approving the Issuance of Obligations by the City of Lilydale, Minnesota to Finance a Project by Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis" SECOND: Member RESULT: On a roll call vote the motion was carried. Ayes: Nays: Not Voting: Absent: M: I DOCS 11699510000021 ROL I I OA 11580 a. DOCX To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: James Hovland Mayor Date: March 5, 2013 6 y V � peen Agenda Item M. VIII. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Appointments To Advisory Boards, Committees And Commissions Action Requested: Appoint the persons listed below. Information / Background: The City received applications for members to fill vacancies on its advisory boards, commissions and committees. The City Council conducted interviews of applicants on February 7, 11 and 20, 2013. Members who were unable to meeting the attendance requirement during 2012 were also interviewed on these dates with the intention of reappointment. The following slate of people has been recommended for appointment or reappointment as noted below: New Appointments — All three -year terms ending 2/1/2016 unless noted differently () Art Center Board — Kandace Ellis (02/1/2015) and Paul Peterson Community Health Committee — Melinda Bothum - Hurley (2/1/2014), Nadia Martin (2/1/2015), Alison Pence (2/1/2014), and Joel Stegner Construction Board of Appeals — Michael Birdman (2/1/2014), Tim Cross, Kip Peterson (2/1/2014) and Susan Lee (2/1/2015) Energy & Environment Commission — John Howard Heritage Preservation Board — Tracy Holtan, Connie McDermott, Tim O'Brien and Ryan Weber Human Rights & Relations Commission — Laura Davis (2/1/2015) and Leslie Lagerstrom (2/1/2014) Transportation Commission — Dawn Spanhake Reappointment: Park Board — Joseph Hulbert (2/1/2014) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St - Edina, MN 55424 t o e ,888 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M VIII. B. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: March 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -27 Supporting Legislation For Street Improvement Districts Action Requested: Approve resolution supporting legislation for street improvement districts. Information / Background: Attached is an email from the League of Minnesota Cities describing the bills that have been introduced into the House and Senate regarding legislation that would allow cities to establish street improvement districts. The original versions of the submitted bills are also attached. Attachments: • Resolution No. 2013 -27 Supporting Legislation for Street Improvement District • Email from APWA - Minnesota Chapter regarding Street Improvement Districts • House File 745 • Senate File 607 GA W\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \PAVEMENT MGMT\Misc \Item VIII. B. Resolution No. 2013 -27 Supporting Legislation for Street Improvement Districts.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 Ik RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -27 SUPPORTING LEGISLATION FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has introduced legislation, House File No. 745 and Senate File No. 607, that will allow cities to establish street improvement districts; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina supports the passage of this enabling legislation that would create a tool that the City could utilize to offset its future roadway costs; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that urges the Minnesota legislature to pass House File No. 745 and Senate File No 607. Dated: March 5, 2013 Attest:_ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 5, 2013, and as recorded in the. Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day. of , 20_ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 City Clerk Wayne Houle . From: APWA MN <apwamin nesota@g mail. com > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 8:23 PM Subject: Street Improvement District Bill Introduced Fellow colleagues: There is currently legislation being proposed that would allow cities to create street improvement districts. The legislation being proposed is enabling legislation which means cities can decide whether or not they would like to use this type of funding mechanism. This type of legislation has been supported by our association, as well as the city engineers association, for many years as a means to provide us another tool in our street funding toolbox. The information below provides a great summary of the legislation, and as public works advocates, what we need to do to help get this legislation passed. I would urge you to take the time to review this legislation with your city managers, and develop a plan for making certain your local legislators know you support this legislation. I truly feel that this legislation has a good chance of passing if we can pull together, and get the word out that we support it! If you have any questions, please contact Anne Finn as mentioned below. Thanks for your interest. Lee Gustafson President, APWA -MN Lee Gustafson, P.E. Director of Engineering City of Minnetonka /14600 Minnetonka Blvd. /Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone 952.939.8239/ Email: Igustafson @eminnetonlza.com A League initiative that would allow cities to create street improvement districts was introduced in the House and Senate this week. (Published Feb 22, 2013) A League initiative that would allow cities to create street improvement districts was introduced in the House on Feb. 20 and in the Senate on Feb. 21. HF 745 (Erhardt, DFL- Edina) and SF 607 (Carlson, DFL -Eagan) would allow cities to collect fees from property owners within a district to fund municipal street maintenance, construction, reconstruction, and facility upgrades. If enacted, this legislation would provide cities with an additional tool to build and maintain city streets. The street improvement district initiative has been a high legislative priority for the League in recent years, and it may have renewed momentum in 2013 due to its endorsement by the Governor's Transportation Finance Advisory Committee and the growing likelihood of passage of a meaningful transportation funding package this year. The House bill has been referred to the Government Operations Committee and the Senate companion has been referred to the State and Local Government Committee. Both bills have a mix of Republican and lemocratic- Farmer -Labor (DFL) co- authors. If the bills pass through initial committees, they are expected to ..avel to transportation committees in both bodies. We need your help The League is encouraging city officials to ask their legislators to support this initiative as it moves through the committee process. League policies LE -6 and LE -30 (pages 46 and 62 in 2013 City Policies) reference the League's support for this tool. Access contact information for your legislator here. In advocating for this tool, the League is stressing the following points: • This is enabling legislation. No city would be required to create a municipal street improvement district. • The street improvement district authority legislation is modeled after Minn. Stat. 435.44, which allows cities to establish sidewalk improvement districts. • This authority would provide a funding mechanism that is fair. It establishes a clear relationship between who pays fees and where projects occur, but stops short of the benefit test that sometimes makes special assessments vulnerable to legal challenges. It also does not prohibit cities from collecting fees from tax exempt properties within a district. • This tool allows cities to perform maintenance and reconstruction on schedule. Timely maintenance is essential to preserving streets and thereby protecting taxpayer investments. • This tool would allow property owners to fund expensive projects by paying relatively small fees over time. The tool could be used to mitigate or eliminate the need for special assessments. questions? Contact Anne Finn at (651 28) 1 -1263 or afinn@lmc.org. Anne Finn I Assistant Intergovernmental Relations Director League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Ave. West I St. Paul, MN 55103 Tel: (6 1) 281 -1263 1 Fax: (651) 215 -4117 afinn(&Imc.org Want to know what's happening at the Capitol? Bookmark LMC's Third Reading newsfeed and follow #Imcleg on Twitter. Pat Schutrop Chapter Assistant PO Box 27965 Golden Valley, MN 55427 1- 888 - 407 -2650 (toll free) pschutrop@mcg.net H.F. No. 745, as introduced - 88th Legislative Session (2013 -2014) Page 1 of 3 f •. Legislature Home I Links to the World Help Advanced Search t4_ Minnesota House of Representatives House I Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions I Bill Search and Status I Statutes, Laws, and Rules KEY: = removed, old language. underscored = added, new language. Authors and Status List versions i H.F. No. 745, as introduced - 88th Legislative Session (2013 -2014) Posted on Feb 20, 2013 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to municipalities; authorizing municipalities to establish street 1.3 improvement districts and apportion street improvement fees within districts; 1.4 requiring adoption of street improvement plan; authorizing collection of fees; 1.5 proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 435. 1.6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.7 Section 1. [435.391 MUNICIPAL STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS. 1.8 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms 1.9 have the meanings given them. 1.10 (b) "Governing body" means the city council of a municipality. 1.11 (c) "Improvements" means construction, reconstruction, and facility upgrades 1.12 involving: right -of -way acquisition; paving, curbs and gutters; bridges and culverts and 1.13 their repair; milling; overlaying, drainage and storm sewers, excavation; base work; 1.14 subgrade corrections; street lighting; traffic signals, signage; sidewalks; pavement 1.15 markings, boulevard and easement restoration, impact mitigation, connection and 1.16 reconnection of utilities; turn lanes; medians, street and alley returns, retaining walls; 1.17 fences, lane additions; and fixed transit infrastructure, trails, or pathways. "Fixed transit 1.18 infrastructure" does not include commuter rail rolling stock, light rail vehicles, or 1.19 transit way buses; capital costs for park- and -ride facilities, feasibility studies, planning, 1.20 alternative analyses, environmental studies, engineering, or construction of transit ways, 1.21 or operating assistance for transit ways. 1.22 (d) "Maintenance" means striping, seal coating, crack sealing_ pavement repair, 1.23 sidewalk maintenance, signal maintenance, street light maintenance, and signage. 1.24 a "Municipal street" means a street, alley, or public way in which the municipality 1.25 is the road authority with powers conferred by section 429.021. 2.1 (fl "Municipality" means a home rule charter or statutory city. 2.2 (g) "Street improvement district" means a geographic area designated by a 2.3 municipality and located within the municipality within which street improvements and 2.4 maintenance may be undertaken and financed according to this section. 2.5 Subd. 2. Authorization. A municipality may establish by ordinance municipal 2.6 street improvement districts and may defray all or part of the total costs of municipal 2.7 street improvements and maintenance by apportioning street improvement fees to all of 2.8 the parcels located in the district. 2.9 Subd. 3. Uniformity. The total costs of municipal street improvements and 2.10 maintenance must be apportioned to all parcels or tracts of land located in the established 2.11 street improvement district on a uniform basis within each classification of real estate. 2.12 Subd. 4. Adoption of plan. Before establishing a municipal street improvement 2.13 district or authorizing a street improvement fee, a municipality must propose and adopt a 2.14 street improvement plan that identifies the location of the municipal street improvement 2.15 district and identifies and estimates the costs of the proposed improvements during the 2.16 proposed period of collection of municipal street improvement fees, which must be for H.F. No. 745, as introduced - 88th Legislative Session (2013 -2014) Page 2 of 3 a period of at least five years and at most 20 years. Notice of a public hearing on the proposed plan must be given by mail to all affected landowners at least ten days before the bearing and posted for at least ten days before the hearing. At the public hearing, the governing body must present the plan and all affected landowners in attendance must have the opportunity to comment before the governing body considers adoption of the plan. Subd. 5. Citywide districts. A municipality that establishes a street improvement district that encompasses the entire political iurisdiction may adiust the fees annually as part of the annual budget process utilizing truth in taxation notices and hearings to satisfy the notice and hearing requirements in this section. A citywide district may be renewed annually for an indefinite period. Subd. 6. Use of fees. Revenues from street improvement fees must be placed in a separate account and used only for projects located within the district and identified in the municipal street improvement plan. Subd. 7. Collection; up to 20 years. (a) An ordinance adopted under this section must provide for billing and payment of the fee on a monthly, quarterly, or other basis as directed by the governing body. The governing body may collect municipal street improvement fees within a street improvement district for a maximum of 20 years. (b) Fees that, as of October 15 of each year, have remained unpaid for at least 30 days may be certified to the county auditor for collection as a special assessment payable in the following calendar year asainst the affected property. Subd. 8. Notice; hearings, A municipality may impose a municipal street improvement fee by ordinance. The ordinance must not be voted on or adopted until after aapublic hearing has been held on the question. Subd. 9. Not exclusive means of financing improvements. The use of the municipal street improvement fee by a municipality does not restrict the municipality from imposing other measures to pay the costs of local street improvements or maintenance, except that a municipality must not impose special assessments for projects funded with street improvement fees. EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective July 1, 2013. Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation to your House Member or State Senator. For Legislative Staff or for directions to the Capitol, visit the Contact Us page. General questions or comments. last updated: 04/18/2012 2.17 2.18 2.19 S.F. No. 607, as introduced - 88th Legislative Session (2013 -2014) Page 1 of 3 a r .. Legislature Home i Links to the World i Help i Advanced Search Minnesota Senate House i Senate i Joint Departments and Commissions i Bill Search and Status i Statutes, Laws, and Rules KEY:A*:r:iR1Een = removed, old language. underscored = added, new language. Authors and Status List versions,I S.F. 'No. 607, as introduced - 88th Legislative Session (2013 -2014) Posted on Feb 19, 2013 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to municipalities; authorizing municipalities to establish street 1.3 improvement districts and apportion street improvement fees within districts; 1.4 requiring adoption of street improvement plan; authorizing collection of fees; 1.5 proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 435. 1.6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.7 Section 1. [435.391 MUNICIPAL STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS. 1.8 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms 1.9 have the meanings given them. 1.10 (b) "Governing body" means the city council of a municipality. 1.11 (c) "Improvements" means construction, reconstruction, and facility upgrades 1.12 involving: right -of -way acquisition; paving; curbs and gutters; bridges and culverts and 1.13 their repair; milling; overlaying; drainage and storm sewers; excavation; base work; 1.14 subgrade corrections; street lighting; traffic signals, signage, sidewalks, pavement 1.15 markings, boulevard and easement restoration; impact mitigation; connection and 1.16 reconnection of utilities; turn lanes; medians; street and alley returns; retaining walls; 1.17 fences; lane additions, and fixed transit infrastructure, trails, or pathways. "Fixed transit 1.18 infrastructure" does not include commuter rail rolling stock, light rail vehicles, or 1.19 transit way buses; capital costs for park- and -ride facilities, feasibility studies, planning, 1.20 alternative analyses, environmental studies, engineering, or construction of transit ways, 1.21 or operating assistance for transit ways. 1.22 (d) "Maintenance" means striping, seal coating, crack sealing, pavement repair, 1.23 sidewalk maintenance, signal maintenance, street light maintenance, and signage. 1.24 (e) "Municipal street" means a street, alley, or public way in which the municipality 1.25 is the road authority with powers conferred by section 429.021. 2.1 (fl "Municipality" means a home rule charter or statutory city. 2.2 (g) "Street improvement district" means a geographic area designated by a 2.3 municipality and located within the municipality within which street improvements and 2.4 maintenance may be undertaken and financed according to this section. 2.5 Subd. 2. Authorization. A municipality may establish by ordinance municipal 2.6 street improvement districts and may defray all or part of the total costs of municipal 2.7 street improvements and maintenance by apportioning street improvement fees to all of 2.8 the parcels located in the district. 2.9 Subd. 3. Uniformity. The total costs of municipal street improvements and 2.10 maintenance must be apportioned to all parcels or tracts of land located in the established 2.11 street improvement district on a uniform basis within each classification of real estate. 2.12 Subd. 4. Adoption of plan. Before establishing a municipal street improvement 2.13 district or authorizing a street improvement fee, a municipality must propose and adopt a 2.14 street improvement plan that identifies the location of the municipal street improvement 2.15 district and identifies and estimates the costs of the proposed improvements during the 2.16 proposed period of collection of municipal street improvement fees, which must be for S.F. No. 607, as introduced - 88th Legislative Session (2013 -2014) Page 2 of 3 a period of at least�five years and at most 20 years. Notice of a public hearing on the proposed plan must be given by mail to all affected landowners at least ten days before the hearing and posted for at least ten days before the hearing. At the public hearing, the governing body must present the plan and all affected landowners in attendance must have the opportunity to comment before the governing body considers adoption of the plan. Subd. 5. Citywide districts. A municipality that establishes a street improvement district that encompasses the entire political iurisdiction may adiust the fees annually as part of the annual budget process, utilizing truth in taxation notices and hearings to satisfy the notice and hearing requirements in this section. A citywide district may be renewed annually for an indefinite period. Subd. 6. Use of fees. Revenues from street improvement fees must be placed in a separate account and used only for projects located within the district and identified in the municipal street improvement plan. Subd. 7. Collection: uo to 20 years. (a) An ordinance adopted under this section must provide for billing and payment of the fee on a monthly, quarterly, or other basis as directed by the izoverning body. The governing body _may collect municipal street immovement fees within a street improvement district for a maximum of 20 years. (b) Fees that, as of October 15 of each year, have remained unpaid for at least 30 days may be certified to the county auditor for collection as a special assessment payable in the following calendar year against the affected property. Subd. 8. Notice: hearings, A municipality may impose a municipal street improvement fee by ordinance. The ordinance must not be voted on or adopted until after a public hearing has been held on the question. Subd. 9. Not exclusive means of financing improvements. The use of the municipal street improvement fee by a municipality does not restrict the municipality from imposing other measures to paav the costs of local street improvements or maintenance, except that a municipality must not impose special assessments for projects funded with street improvement fees. EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective July 1, 2013. Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation to your House Member or State Senator. For Legislative Staff or for directions to the Capitol, visit the Contact Us page. General questions or comments. last updated: 04/18/2012 2.17 2.18 2.19 1 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL 0 ( --- 1.1,� Agenda Item #: IX. k From: Debra Mangen Action M City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: March 5, 2013 Information O Subject: Receive Petition Circulated By Emily Boettge Requesting Sidewalk Action Requested: Motion receiving the February 27, 2013 petition requesting sidewalk in the Cornelia Elementary School Public School Zone/Walking Shed and refer it to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Information / Background: On Tuesday, February 27, 2013, Emily Boettge submitted a petition signed by residents in and around Cornelia Elementary School. The petition requested sidewalk construction to be assessed in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan regarding sidewalks in a Public School Zone/Walking Shed. The normal process is to formally receive the petition and refer it to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Attachment: Petition City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 I Emily Boettge 6816 Oaklawn Ave. SEAS eF Edina, MN 55435 EB 2 6 2013 4801 W 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and the City Council, Please see the attached petition from homeowners in favor of building sidewalks along Cornelia Dr. and West Shore Dr. in the Cornelia neighborhood. We believe that our neighborhood needs sidewalks along these busy roadways to create a safe path, for pedestrians to walk. Although sidewalks would be beneficial throughout our neighborhood, Cornelia Dr. and West Shore Dr., in particular, are busy streets that are direct routes to Cornelia Elementary and The Edina Aquatic Center. We are concerned that walking in the street is not safe, especially for our children who walk to Cornelia Elementary School. Walking in the street isn't safe at any time of year, but the threat is exacerbated during the winter months when children are obscured by snow banks, walking in the road while the snow plows are out, dodging bad drivers and trying to make their way in less than ideal conditions. Furthermore, with a residential speed limit set at 30 mph, motorists often accelerate upwards of 40 mph and drive at these speeds while distracted. We have signed the petition in the hopes that you will consider our neighborhood a priority for upcoming infrastructure projects. Enclosed are two letters from neighbors and photos to illustrate how the snow accumulates on Cornelia Dr,. directly across the street from Cornelia Elementary, making walking very dangerous. Sincerely, illy- oettge Encl. letters from residents, photos Jeff Garfin 6841 Oaklawn Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 To whom it may concern, December 17, 2012 I am writing to you not only as a concerned Parent of 2 children who attend Cornelia Elementary School, but, also as a 20 year Employee of the Edina Fire Department who has responded to many Personal Injury accidents in my time as a full time Paramedic / Firefighter. My family and I live 2 blocks from Cornelia School and, for that reason, we walk our Kindergartener and Second grader to and from school daily. I have always been cautious and concerned about walking them, especially, on Dunberry Lane and Cornelia Drive which are busy streets. The sidewalk on the West side of Cornelia Drive heading North from 70`' Street is only a half block long. Where there is no sidewalk. Our options are to walk on resident's lawns when there is no snow (which create paths on homeowner's lawns) and in the street when there is snow. As you see in the picture above (taken, looking North on Cornelia Drive, on December 12'h, 2012) children have to walk in traffic due to no sidewalk. The SUV driving South in the picture, is forced to drive in the North bound lane causing not only a hazard to pedestrian traffic, but also to vehicle traffic. In the picture you can see how children have to walk in the actual traffic lane. Children can easily slip and vehicles can easily slide which will someday cause a preventable tragedy. I believe any main street leading towards a School should have sidewalks, due to the number of walkers, going to and from schools. This is a public safety issue and I strongly encourage continuing the sidewalk on the West side of Cornelia Drive, North from 70'h Street. I think it would also be in the best interest of public safety if the sidewalk continued the entire length of Cornelia Drive, from 70 "' Street to 66'h Street as it is the main route to the Edina Aquatic Center for residents living to the south. Cornelia Drive was recently marked as a "Bike Blvd." which may increase the usage of the street by bikes causing even more concerns for pedestrians forced to walk in the street / Bike Blvd. Thank you for taking the time to consider the safety of our children and residents of Edina. Jeffrey G. Garfin gEAL .r January 21, 2013 Peter and Kathy Pascale 4505 Dunberry Lane Edina MN 55435 To the City of Edina; We are writing to let you know our concern for our neighborhoods' safety regarding sidewalks. We have 3 kids who walk to the pool in the summer and now that they are getting older to many of their activities. We are very concerned that there are no sidewalks for them to walk safely to where they need to go. We do a lot of walking in the neighborhood for exercise and feel the neighborhood could be safer for pedestrians, especially on West Shore and Cornelia. , We see the older people in the neighborhood out for walks and wonder how safe they are walking with cars speeding so fast down our streets. When it is dark it is especially hard to see teenagers and people walking their dogs at night. They often times will walk on people's lawns for more distance from the cars. We are also concerned about the kids who walk to Cornelia or are waiting, for their buses in the morning. Our kids have to wait for the bus when it's dark in the morning and there is not a safe spot for them to stand.while they wait. They have to be in the street where cars can't see them or stand in the neighbor's yard. When kids are out playing or riding their bike or trying to get some place and there are cars parked on the street, we feel really unsafe driving down the street. We use much caution but sidewalks are necessary to be sure that everyone involved has the safest conditions possible. Thank you for considering our request. Please make sidewalks a priority as you look to improve Edina into continuing to be a great place to live for people of all ages. Please make safety an investment into our future and for generations to come. Thank you; Kathy and Peter, Pascale City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50`I' Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL MISIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: Tile persons who have sighed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abode to the locations listed below. West Side- of Cpr Viet - Dr. -b a C.r ossulal le- a} Duv\lo-trr'u Ln. -Fo . between_ (7 �~ S l . and -h to nbtXr'u L n . LOCATION OF. I \IPROVE \IEN'1'111'!itREE'I'NAME ADDRESS ADDRE S -the E46f Side ol- Cot y\e.licLtoy. beIwcen_ DLknl0crr!4 and 1,(a4--,\ St-. LOCATION F IMPROVEMENT rREET .CIF `1p`Y rte; try�'G ADDRES. ADDRESS ceat l5eti�een " S }.. �o Ln k a D and u v1 t rr y LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT Bl' S tEE'r NAME ADDRESS ADDRI: S "e_ WcS.t- S;de o(- West Shore W. bets \•eenl)unberr - j Un • and (0G–k- 9E-. 41,OCATION OF IAIPROVE�IENT Rl' S'rREET NA\!E JJcteuva.l11L cbr%Strvkci+0r 40 be asscr. GO( in o �[ o•^alar ADDRESS ee W i }h -4I+G C`iti ADDRESS of �dino'S Gernp +aY+enS �G -tm, +5Nr+c.4,0n plan regaect.4 -1 SWeWatKg in aL Pt&bliL S 4-icol 20r+e: /yWa.lk,*v1q Shed . IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) E• rv,i 114 'AJ . ffr \2A it . ^fit ! -'C 1 Y'\ PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) (ok l(0 cc, k(c'0y, F di nd . M N 5S`! -cZS wl9 E' l 4 l l!^kk o w Ave. E6 via, M N 5,51 A5 NANIEJ ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME - (PRINTED) �T.� ✓ Fct S c «( Y-- s c :L_ Jr 9W4 - A" A e_1 F&,-e e- t_e,,, lkaj J�r IS�`ic� �LUn �b�rU —Le cc 1-1"!, 4ctdr�rnn+ C� (I e x V nr-,,d e r of hard I � L --so, 07,t/4 it �n PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) j5 y35 �a An3Gier rL-6 1R601s - L)fI -)de o-P gcf-cdal 6 9 1(v I-�r.' 1[._r Lh. 20 , "u 9--, 4 �Iq 12 vJ iJN-' e as,"Nol X54 -35 �JSI 6 8 33 4ve C cc J n4r SS VOL r j QqY g aa,k-ta �S�Qa r�(,�r�av�I,�I Lza. jssy3s LMI lH W • gee44ge -. 6 mo NANIE ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practice::Ict requires that we it form poa ofd our rights about the private darn ire are requesting on this form. Uncler the leAv. your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted frill become public information. There is no consequence. %r refusing to supply thi.e if formation. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) This petition was circulated by: �ati� �e- vntz��s �Z� S i ±Thu'6 Zahleboq=/ I,uv-'l Atlldnra kq r 15 60,i f71e1�5Sc�Ja� r�` c �% �i ��.�f'h�✓ �olLc✓r� 2rp�� Lomas' PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) / Ze `/ kJ ('SOS wV,5ti"•. SS y 3j- � wte rS�tvt LA u u N4 C goo k)oMcke,We Sb Y Uz F Shag -- Pf. . Ftt,- , 55` 135 E,-.6 l" ate 4- .tc►P. t Un 0a k la o n .6 /e v NAME Q ADDRESS e- �v PHONE The - Whinesola Data Practices Acl requires than we it forin you of yourYighls about the private dour we are requesling on this form: Under the law, your telephone number is private data. T his petition when submitted will become public information. There is no cunsequence, for re frtsing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTI'ONN'NER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTVADDRESS (PRINTED) 13 11 u Xn aRCAA Mw+br,� WZ4 W6L16f, Dq�V- 1 1) L,(.C7 71 ►-) t -5p i-e- c. 0 u o d d a Skill. 41, V C-I,Y- h This petition was circulated by: I,- 7(�Lj J fell.- p&IF- 00� a� ,o �, Ave- q572- ki NAME Q ADDRESS PHONE The illinnesola Dala Practices ,=lc/ requires that we inform you qfyour rights about the private dala ive are requesting on this form. Under the law, your. telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted wi// become public information. There. is no consequence for• refusing ►d'supply this ii?foi illation. You may attach extra pages with signatUres. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE • (PRINTED) r � PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) r- This petition was circulated by: �C �-� �� ✓ ✓�, "w �s' S �w�A 21� i r (�T� C� � :--' eQ, t � (�, . F-mI1 'F- c?-1 -r to�1(n t`nkIn,o' -) A NAt\,I.EJ ADDRESS PHONE /'he Minnesota Data'Praclices Acl requires that use inform )you of your rights irboul the privak- dada we are requesting on ibis form. Under the lenv, your lelephone number is private data. This petition when suhmitted mill become public in/ornralion. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 Ju) r e- -Tc ►-I S CAC., e.r 1 � Jam. ��/ r'P�i �� G01,N 1,'z. Dr This petition was circulated by: �C �-� �� ✓ ✓�, "w �s' S �w�A 21� i r (�T� C� � :--' eQ, t � (�, . F-mI1 'F- c?-1 -r to�1(n t`nkIn,o' -) A NAt\,I.EJ ADDRESS PHONE /'he Minnesota Data'Praclices Acl requires that use inform )you of your rights irboul the privak- dada we are requesting on ibis form. Under the lenv, your lelephone number is private data. This petition when suhmitted mill become public in/ornralion. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 IMV S;p IF I -sit 74 E -,W- � ! �PIrau._. s r AL a To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: March 5, 2013 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council Meeting. No action is requested. O P 1 MG�r Agenda Item #: IX. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information City of Edina 48 01 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 'A tri U? O Susan Howl Subject: MN State Passenger Rail Transit /Street Cars /Light Rail To Whom it may concern: Please support (Politically & Financially) the effort for affordable fast State of Minnesota Rail Transit Welcome to the Vented Frustrations of a DAILY COMMUTER and LONG TERM MINNESOTA RESIDENT, PLEASE SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS!!!! -NLX to Duluth (So we can help the Duluth economy, UMD and attend the Duluth Maritime Festival) We can call it the Herb Brooks Train, since real people, really do DIE on our crap MN roads. -Zip Rail to Rochester, so my friends and I who end up taking our parents to Mayo don't have to take that death trap known as HWY 52 -Fast Train to Fargo, So Minnesotans can better benefit from the Oil Boom in North Dakota and not worry about being snowed in a ditch off of HWY 94 - Northstar Rail to St. Cloud (So my friend's kids can go to St.Cloud State w/o having to pay for room and board & I won't have to sit on 494N for two hours trying to reach my cabin) And then maybe you'll be able to get the freaking NorthStar Passengers stats up!! -SW Light Rail, Dan Patch Corridor and a light rail line that runs west on 394 or Hwy 55. Every Morning and every Evening I can litterally hold a picnic on the hood of my vehicle as I wait in traffic. The Byerly's fried chicken smells really good as I sit there and wait on HWY 100 !!! -Dan Patch would also get to Northfield which would allow Minneapolis students to attend Carleton College & St.Olaf without have to pay a King's fortune in Room & Board. By the way another one of my friend's sisters DIED on the freeway trying to get back to St.Olaf - A street car from the central corridor to the State Fair Grounds (Seasonal) and Hamline, Mac, UST and the other St. Paul colleges. ITS ONLY THE GREAT MN GET TOGETHER, I THINK IT WILL GET USED!!!!!! - Street Cars in all of South Minneapolis and the first ring suburbs such as St.Louis Park, Richfield, Edina, Unless of course the game plan is to take out thousands of homes worth Multiple Millions of dollars in order lay more concrete that MN DOT won't plow in the winter. That first snow fall this season was the worst performance I've seen in my 20 plus years of driving Well there you have it, said my peace, as a taxpayer I'm fine with increasing the sales tax, the gas tax, the income tax, & the internet sales tax, just give me something tangible that I can see, and that gives long term benefit to us all. I'm tired of waiting and watching my life go past my eyes on MN Highways at 5 miles per hour and in other cases seeing my friends die from crap infrastructure. PS: 5 minutes slower and I would have been dead at the bottom of the 35W bridge collapse, just trying to get from work at Honeywell to home that day. Sincerely, Andy Brown 5512 Park Place =dins MN 55424 312- 220 -3045 Susan Howl Subject: Bike Lanes on Wooddale Ave. No driver's lanes? Three times while driving down Wooddale Ave. running into a car. The first, I reported to said they had nothing to do with the parking painted on Wooddale. He said he had heard of about this. He said the "project" was passed question is: what happened to a YELLOW line of Wooddale? at night I narrowly missed an Edina Police Officer. He lane, and the bike lanes several people concerned by the Edina City Council. My being painted down the middle I have never seen a bike rider on Wooddale the last 30 times I drove down Wooddale. (I've seen one on 70th.) I would think the LEAST the Council could do was to have included a YELLOW line down the middle. My wife and I have lived in Edina for 47 years. Our son and his wife have lived in Edina for 25 years, their children, 14 to 22 years) We have all been bike riders at one time or another. (My wife,Pat, used to ride from Bruce Avenue over to Lake Harriet, around part of Lake Calhoun, around Lake of the Isles, and back home. Don't recall many bike lanes along the way.) Now when I drive down Wooddale at night I drive about 5 miles an hour when another car is approaching me while I try to figure how much space I have. Someone told me that I could drive in the Bike Lane if no bike riders are present. Or in the parking lane. HELLO! You couldn't afford a YELLOW line? Jack,Sr. & Pat Mertes 6730 Vernon Ave. pmert4620 @yahoo.com 1 ,Susan'Howl Subject: Very frustrated with your plans Sara & 1en, Karen and I feel completely mislead by you. We now have copies of your plans and the survey, and the new building is SUBSTANTIALLY bigger than your current house. It's obvious Sicora did everything they could to max -out what they could build on your lot. It's MUCH closer to our home - It appears to go back 10 FEET (OR MORE) FARTHER than your current family room (you told us it wouldn't go back any farther than the current room, and it appears to go back an additional 10 -15 feet) - And I will never understand what logical reason there is to have a roof peak so high. What possible, practical purpose is there to having a house go so much higher than your living space on the second floor. Sicora and you sure went through the motions of being sensitive to the neighborhood, but in the end all you cared about were your own selfish and superficial desires. When we met with you we requested you take the code changes being considered into account, and you gave us the impression you would. It's now obvious you not only didn't do this — you made sure you took advantage of every possible inch available under the existing code. We expected this from Dave Allen when he tore down the house on the other side of us last month because he's a contractor, but we had higher hopes for somebody that the neighborhood happily welcomed when you moved in last year and who appeared to want to be part of that neighborhood. This email is copied to the entire city council, the planning commission, and people that have been advising the task force in hopes we can find any problem, mistake, or loophole in your plans that we can use to our advantage. Paul Nicholas 4016 Lynn Ave (612) 269 -7300 ED I t "Ift am R. MAIU rL-Oop FLAU bA-tt5MVQ'T rLOO12 FLAID I i a 4\ ....... .... ............. . . .... ..... ---- 7-Z- r',, Izoor rLAO Qj a ,VeOUO LOOP rLAO z O W z 0 w i1 RIGHT VLIO�VATIOU uern a pbAR t�LCVATIOU .mat aee�s • � /.•. re acxe. � /.•. rc TLC T CLt�VATIOU r. ROUT VLCVATIOU i W U Z h t411of 0 W Q �. Z a a. p W . 3 a 0 cc N N W r,*^ ! i J°6a tz.-e htG11011 'D' htL11011 'A' '. (DTIPle-AL WALL hbe-TIOQ b 0 m CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR SICORA, INC. OF LOT 8, BLOCK 3, MINIKAHDA VISTA THIRD ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EXISTING HOUSE 012 I - "" S- 89°3630" E 13 I I " 26' ASH - =� a; - 22`SIL R� .P 1 / —� L O -HQUSE m 34' SILVER a MAPLE 7.. N i O , OSTWG CONCRETE DRIVEWAY r yV l #4014 EWAY _ -.. . =.: oary ", r gL3 •o m ..: N _::_._._:.�.: _:---_-"... _ .,.. ma�y`` I .,� J'^ � g,gFta' SILVER "999— !L E I•� . : 4 °363D:' W, 133.80 \ EXISTING j ;:..r HOUSE ,` I - #4016 60 V: J Zt W Q v LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (VERIFY) Lot 8, Block 3, MINIKAHDA VISTA THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE, MINNESOTA 0 210 1) GARAGE = 901.0 This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property, the topography of the property, and the location of an existing house, driveway and major trees thereon, SCALE IN FEET 2) TOP OF FOUNDATION = 901.3 and the proposed location of a proposed house and driveway. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 3) BASEMENT = 893.1 : Iron marker found Iron marker set Existing contour line SCALE 5� Proposed contour line ,eie�or: s ncenr•Inrcc lur• I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report x,._20. — Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum -HQUSE 60 V: J Zt W Q v LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (VERIFY) Lot 8, Block 3, MINIKAHDA VISTA THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE, MINNESOTA 0 210 1) GARAGE = 901.0 This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property, the topography of the property, and the location of an existing house, driveway and major trees thereon, SCALE IN FEET 2) TOP OF FOUNDATION = 901.3 and the proposed location of a proposed house and driveway. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 3) BASEMENT = 893.1 : Iron marker found Iron marker set Existing contour line SCALE 5� Proposed contour line ,eie�or: s ncenr•Inrcc lur• I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report x,._20. — Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum City of Edina 4801 W. 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council Members, February 25, 2013 On February 20, 2013, 1 sent an email to the City of Edina asking three questions in reference to Edina City Council member Josh Sprague's affirmative vote on the 5801 Crescent Terrace variance request. To date, I have no official response to these simple, yet important, questions. Restated, I ask if council member Sprague, 1) works for the realty company involved with the sale of said property, 2) works in the same office of realtor directly involved in sale of said property and 3) whether council mernber Sprague publicly disclosed these facts prior to the variance vote. I have since reviewed the tape of the Edina City Council meeting of February 19, 2013, and confirmed that member Sprague did not make any public disclosure of any information raised in my first two questions. The League of Minnesota Cities publishes an information memo titled "Official Conflict of Interest ". Under section IV. Section B page 16, it states, "Any city official who has a personal financial interest in an official non - contractual action is generally disqualified from participating in that action ". The memo further states, "some would argue that the member participation makes the decision voidable, even if his or her vote was not necessary. The bias of one council member could make a city decision arbitrary." I would hope the Council would take this situation seriously and take appropriate action. I request response to my three questions. At this point I am requesting this issue be placed on the agenda for the next city council meeting. Please let me know if you plan to honor this request as I will need adequate time to make travel plans back to Edina for the meeting. In the meantime, I am officially requesting, according to data practices statute, that the city email me any documents of the City of Edina that speaks to Code of Ethics or other Governance documents that reference a council members' disclosure or recuse expectations given a potential conflict of interest. If there is something that I am confused concerning this matter, please contact me. Thank you for your consideration of my concems. Suzanne Knelman 859- 707 -5639 'Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 8:24 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina council Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �_ 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 .�� J „yi,� IbiunnoCDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Dxbell(@aol.com [mailto:DxbellCd)aol.coml Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 6:03 PM To: jonibennettl2Cabcomcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague(dedinarealtYcom; swensonannlC&gmail.com; Edina Mail Subject: Edina council Yesterday when I opened my gas bill I was informed that once again Edina is imposing a new tax on its citizens with a "franchise fee" This latest fee has finally made me so fed up with all the latest proposals that I must write to the council and express how unhappy I am with what all the new changes that recently have been created by this council. It started with the ruining of 70th Street. The stop light on West Shore Dr stops traffic every 1 minute whether there is cross traffic or not. It is completely energy inefficient. Slowing the speed limit to 25mph is forcing cars to use side streets because the traffic backs up on 70th St in part because of the needless stop lights and roundabouts. There are other streets with bike paths but they are not at 25 MPH. Maybe the speed limit is set at 25 mph because one of you lives on that street. Wooddale is a complete disaster and it should be changed back to the way it was before there are more accidents. Streets have been ground out to change the lane markings and just left that way. It is not a quality look for Edina. Recycling has now been reduced to twice per month. Yet the citizens are still charged the same weekly fee. This is just another example of cutting services and not passing the savings on to the citizens . Now my cell phone has a city tax. There is also a bike path maintenance tax, This council should be looking at ways to reduce spending not looking to create new taxes. We have enough of that problem with the Federal Govt, Why can't Edina lead by example and try to reduce expenses rather than create new taxes? Dede Darling Ries PNO%M SHAKOPEE February 19, 2013 Honorable Governor Mark Dayton Office of the Governor 130 State Capitol 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 RE: Your proposal to increase the regional sales tax for transit Dear Governor Dayton: Metropolitan Council FEB 2 5 2013 Received Chales Office 1 write to express the support of the Shakopee City Council for your proposal to increase the sales tax for transit purposes by t/a cent in the seven - county Metropolitan Area. On Tuesday, February 19th, the City Council voted to support this proposal. We share your belief that the development of a complete and competitive transit system in the Region is key to its long -term economic competitiveness and vitality. The development of a complete and multi -modal transit system in the Twin Cities Region will also be of great benefit to the Region's workers and residents. The $200 million per year your proposal is expected to generate is essential to completing important rail, LRT and BRT projects in the Region, as well as assuring that areas like Scott County can continue to expand local and express bus service that will help to best utilize the investments in regional roadways. In Shakopee, we have been committed to the beneficial expansion of transit options that serve our residents and businesses. Most recently, this has been expressed in the partnership between the Cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake, and Scott County. This partnership led to the creation of the B1ueXpress in July of 2007, a commuter service which has continued to experience among the greatest rates of growth of any regional bus service provider (9% increase in 2012). COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857 129 Holmes Street South - Shakopee, Minnesota • 55379 -1351 • 952- 233.9300 • FAX 952- 233 -3801 • %vww.ci.shnkopcc.mn.us We look forward to working with you, your office and the Legislature on the implementation of this important proposal. Sincerely, B Mayor, City of Shakopee cc: Representative Frank Hornstein Senator Steve Murphy Representative Mike Beard Senator Eric Pratt Representative Tony Albright v?Vretropolitan Council Chair Susan Haigh Senator Scott Dibble Senator Kevin Dahle Scott County Chair Tom Wolf Scott County Commissioner Dave Menden Scott County Commissioner Joe Wagner Scott County Commissioner Barbara Marschall Susan Howl From: Kitty O'Dea [mailto:kodea.mn(abgmail.coml Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: 4524 Bruce Please forward to City Council: Re Construction Management Concerns I watched the Council meeting tonight. I am happy to hear Council discussing the construction management issues in Edina. I know it is a thorny issue and appreciate that you are trying to find some solutions. Expectations need to be set and residents educated about what their role is and what the rules are. It is frustrating to call the police over and over and not have any tickets issued. Also, not all builders require close supervision, but some do...... Kitty O'Dea Begin forwarded message: From: Kitty O'Dea <kodea.mn(c- gmail.com> Subject: 4524 Bruce Date: February 12, 2013 8:49:12 PM CST To: SKirchman(aD-EdinaMN.gov, jlong(cD-edinamn.gov Cc: sneal(cDEdinaMN.gov Steve & Jeff, I am hoping that you can clarify some things regarding construction management. I assume that the builder at 4524 signed a construction management agreement (see attached below). My questions are: Steve: - What are the consequences of not following the agreement? - Whose responsibility is it to monitor construction sites for compliance to the agreement? Jeff: - I've called the police several times regarding the blocked sidewalk. I was told to do this by the police department when there was construction next to my house. On the most recent call, I asked the officer why he didn't issue a ticket. He said that there had been no other reports of the blocked sidewalk since construction had started and it was the officers discretion whether or not to issue a citation. If they move the vehicle, the police don't ticket. What is being missed is that the offenders keep on offending when the officers aren't there. I was surprised that he said there were no other complaints when I had called at least 4 times over the past few months. My questions are: 1. Why aren't calls to a construction site captured in the system by that address? 2. How can the officer know if this is a one time event or habitual practice if the data isn't kept? '2. At what point will a ticket be issued? Its clear that the builders and their contractors know that there are no consequences for violating the agreement/City ordinances. As a result, they habitually break the rules. The City has put the residents in the position of monitoring and reporting violations. That's fine, I understand that the City staff can't be there 24/7, but it is very frustrating to make the effort to report an issue and see that nothing of consequence happens, no records are kept and the behavior continues unchecked. If the police /City would start issuing a few citations, I'll wager that the issues would be resolved. Here are the issues that I've seen at 4524 Bruce. I did ask them to move vehicles and equipment a few times, but got tired after having the same thing happen over and over, I finally called the police. Its hard to figure out what the City Ordinances cover these issues, but I took a shot at it. Even if they don't bio;ate code, they do violate the construction management agreement. 1. There is construction equipment on the boulevard in front of 4526 Bruce (neighbors home) Not sure, but I think this violates Section 1035.03 subs 4 littp: / /Iegacy.ci.edina.mn.us /CityCode /L5- O 1 _C it_yCodeSect l 03 5.htm and Violates section 421 of Edina City Code (eight of way management http://Iegacy.ci.edina.mn.us/CityCode/L5-01 CityCodeSect0421 .htm 2. Repeated instances of vehicles blocking the sidewalk - these are parked vehicles, not unloading or loading. Violates Section 425 Edina City Code littp://Iegacy.ci.ediiia.mn.us/CityCode/L5- 01 _CityCodeSect0425.htm 3. Trucks are parked on the curb / /boulevard Violates Section 1400.10 Subd. 1 Edina City Code http• / /Iegtacy.ci.edina.mn.us /CityCode /L5- 0l CityCodeSect l 400.htm 4. Trucks are parking within 5 feet of the driveways Violates Section 1400.10 Subd. 1 Edina City Code http: / /legacy.ci.edina.nin.us /CityCode /L5- 01 _CityCodeSect] 400.htm 5. There has been debris, including nails on the sidewalk. Violates Section 425 Edina City Code http: / /legacy.ci.edina.mn.us /CityCode /L5- 01 CityCodeSect0425.htm I would like to see the following: 1. CIty start tracking complaints by construction site address and builder 2. Start issuing tickets /take action for repeated violations. I understand giving them 1 chance, but if its a repeat offense at the same address a ticket should be issued. 3. Issue a copy of the construction rules and code that applies to construction to neighbors on the street where construction is taking place and let them know what to do if there are any problems. I spoke to some of the neighbors adjacent to 4524. They said they didn't know that these issues were violations of the code /CM agreement and didn't know what to do if they happen. Rules without enforcement/consequences aren't rules. The builder at 4524 is the same one that built next to me and I had the same issues, and more, several years ago. I appreciate your response. Thanks Kitty Attachement: 1. Construction Management http://edinai-nii.gov/corecode/uploads/docunieiit/uploaded pdfs /corecode edina/ConstructionM.anagementPlan2 012_1 8.pdf 100.09 Penalties. Subd. 1 Petty Misdemeanors. Whenever an act or omission is declared in this Code to be a petty misdemeanor, any person violating the provision will, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $200. The cost of prosecution may be added to the penalty imposed on every person convicted of violating any provision of this Code. Subd. 2 Misdemeanors. In any case other than those in which a violation is expressly stated to be a petty misdemeanor in this Code, any person violating any provision of this Code, or any rule or regulation adopted under this Code will, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and be subject to a fine of not more than $700 or imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 days or both, plus, in either case, the cost of prosecution. The cost of prosecution may be added to the penalty imposed on every person convicted of violating any provision of this Code. Subd. 3 Separate Violations. Unless otherwise provided, each act of violation and every day on which a violation occurs or continues, constitutes a separate offense. Subd. 4 Application to City Personnel. The failure of any officer or employee of the City to perform any official duty imposed by this Code will not subject the officer or employee to the penalty imposed for violation unless a penalty is specifically provided for such failure. Subd. 5 Other Remedies. In addition to the remedies set out above in this Subsection, the City may exercise, with or separately, from such remedies and at the same or separate times, all and any legal and equitable remedies then available to the City by this Code or State Law to enforce this Code, or to recover any fees, charges or expenses owed to City pursuant to this Code, including, without limitation, injunction and the penalties and remedies in any provision incorporated into this Code by reference as provided by Subd. 8 of this Subsection. Subd. 6 Costs of Enforcement. The person or persons violating this Code shall be jointly and severally liable for all fees or costs incurred by the City in enforcing this Code, or in collecting any fees, charges or expenses, including interest, owed to the City, including attorney's fees. Interest on such fees and costs, from the dates incurred until paid, shall be charged at a rate equal to the lesser of (i) the highest interest rate allowed by law, or (ii) two percentage points in excess of the reference rate. Such person or persons shall also be jointly and severally liable for all costs of collecting such fees, costs and interest, with interest from the dates incurred until paid, at the same rate as is payable on such fees or costs. Reference rate shall mean the rate publicly announced from time to time by First Edina National Bank or any successor thereto. If such bank, or its successor, ceases announcing its rate publicly, reference rate shall mean the interest rate charged from time to time by such bank, or its successor, on 90 -day unsecured business loans to its most credit -worthy customers. Subd. 7 Permits, Licenses and Registrations. In addition to other remedies available to the City, the City may revoke or suspend, pursuant to the provisions of Section 160 of the Code, any permit, license or registration when the holder has violated or failed to comply with any provision of this Codf which applies to the permit, license or registration which is the subject of the suspension or revocation. 3 Subd. 8 Incorporated Law. Any code, statute, or other provision, incorporated into and made a part of this code by reference, shall also include and incorporate any penalties and remedies for violations which are a part of such incorporated provision, and the City may enforce such penalties and pursue such remedies in addition to the other penalties and remedies set out or referenced in this Code. Subd. 9 Interest. All fees, charges and other monies owed to the City pursuant to any provision of this Code, at the option of the City, shall bear interest from the date payable to the City until paid, at the lesser of the two rates set out in Subd. 6 of this Subsection. 4 Susan Howl - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Suzanne Knelman [mailto:sueknelman @aol.coml Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:13 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: > Dear Mayor, > > Early today a neighbor contacted me expressing surprise with the vote. The surprise was that council member Josh Sprague had not recused himself. Could you confirm whether or not council member Sprague is with the realty firm that served as the buyers broker, that he is in the same office as buyers broker and if so did he publicly disclose this potential conflict of interest. > Thank you in your assistance to this issue. > Sent from my Suzanne's iPad 1 Feb 21,1013 Mayor James Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland, On Saturday, March 23, at 8:30 p.m., thousands of cities around the world will go dark_forone hour during Earth Hour, WWF'.s annual campaign to raise awareness of the environmental challenges we all face, such as climate change. As a resident of Minneapolis, I am turning'out my lights and I urge our community to take part in Earth..Hour. Here's how: 1. Turn off all non - essential lights in and around our government buildings 2. Promote the event and encourage landmarks and businesses in our community to join in. Participating for one hour during Earth Hour is only the first step. In addition to that symbolic event, our city can gain recognition for its efforts on climate change through the Earth Hour City Challenge. Our towns and cities are already facing the staggering costs of weather driven to extremes by climate change, and the resulting power outages, flooded roadways, shuttered businesses, and damaged homes are becoming more and more frequent. Many cities across America understand_ these risks and are taking practical measures to prepare. Our city must do the same. With this.letter I challenge our city to first take part in Earth Hour and then to participate in WWF's Earth Hour City Challenge! I hope you help protect my family and fellow residents by preparing for the increasingly extreme weather our community faces. Learn more at http : / /worldwildlif6.org /earthhour. Sincerely, Mr. Doug Westendorp 4915 France Ave S Minneapolis', MN 55410 -1759 6 t I...,eague of 'Women Voters of Edina The Public is invited to League of Women Voters Edina March meetings on Health Insurance Exchanges in Minnesota: Saturday, March 9th 10 - 11:30am at Edina City Hall, Community Room "Health Insurance Exchange Overview" Speaker: April Todd - Malmlov, Exchange Director .r April Todd - Malmlov has 15 years of experience in the public and private health care sectors. Prior to this position, Ms. Todd- Malmlov also served as the Vice President of Strategic Analysis and Communications for Government Affairs at UnitedHealth Group during the debate and passage of the Affordable Care Act. Thursday, March 14th 10- 11:30am at the Southdale Library "Health Reform & the Transformation of Minnesota Health Care" Speaker: Stefan Gildemeister, Minnesota Department of Health As the State Health Economist and Director of the Health Economics Program, Mr. Gildemeister provides policy advice and analytic guidance to Minnesota's implementation of the federal Affordable Care Act. Sponsored by the League of Women Voters Edina �I For more information, see LWVEdina.org or contact LWVEdina @gmail.com Toe Mayor & Council: Members From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date:. March 5, 2013 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS Agenda Item #: 1X. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information X Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received after your packets were delivered. No action is requested. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 0 1 Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:22 AM Subject: FW: P•Is. forward to Mary Brindle This message has been forwarded to the City Council. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant If _ ti 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 I_ ekastner(rDEdinaMN.00v I www.EdinaMN.aov -I ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: WinnieandSteve Martin Finailto:martins60l2 ()gmaii.comI Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 7:15 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: ann Swenson Subject: Pls. forward to Mary Brindle Lynette, Can you please forward to Mary Brindle as info. below is in regards to an article about her comments 1/31. Thanks! Hey Mary, I was speaking with Susie Miller over at Braemar who is making an enthusiastic effort to open the West Arena at Braemar to walking hours for citizens of Edina. She had relayed to me her concern of making this happen and I reflected to her the feedback I heard on 1/17/2013 "do- town" town hall meeting of the multiple requests for safe, indoor walking facilities. I know there is a Walk with Mayor Hovland at Braemar this third Sat. (3/21 I believe) to try to encourage this option for Edina Residents. I couldn't help but think of this as I read p.4 in this weeks Sun Current, Letter to the Editor, about a healthy community and how hard it is to exercise in poor air quality. Braemar is an excellent solution to this issue as it provides a safe, indoor, climate controlled area (ideal for summer and winter) that is currently available and would be of no extra costs to let residents use. Nor would it be at any extra cost to have Braemar extend this offer. Susie's ideal plan would be to have lines painted so it would be similar to an indoor track. 7 laps = 1 mile. In my opinion, this would be an easy, no -cost solution for a voiced need for many of Edina's Citizens. I air a mom of two, not quite a senior citizen : -), and use Braemar often with my family. This would be a great opportunity for our residents, especially senior, if we were able to make this happen. Just wanted to help spread the word. Winnie Martin martins601 2�gmai l.coin 952- 484 -5575 From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:24 AM Subject: FW: Insights to your Meeting on Tuesday with MNA This message has also been forwarded to the Mayor. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant t; 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1�, ekastner(cD Edina MN.gov i www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Livin,; Learning, R 3LSlih Families Si Doing Business From: Kimberly Korb jmailto •kimberlykorb(a)yahoo.com1 Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 5:50 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cary Teague; Steve Kirchman; Kris Aaker; Scott Neal; ionibennettl2Cd)comcast.net; swensonannlPgmail.com, josh (&ioshspraque.com; swensonannlca)gmail.com; joshCa�ioshsprague.com Subject: Insights to your Meeting on Tuesday with MNA Good evening All As a 10+ year resident of Morningside, I want to express that while I feel some of the re- development has not been appropriate for the neighborhood (bad builders), much of it has increased our property values and contributed positively to the city. This weekend, I became aware of the group MNA. They say it represents the residents of Morningside. That is simply NOT TRUE. For over three years I have served as our street/block captain. I know my neighbors, and have never heard of this group before the this weekend. Nor have I been invited to any meetings or received any out -put communications of their "recommendations" for our area. While I will do my best to personally assert these facts.on Tuesday at your meeting, that may not be possible. The purpose of my letter is to advise you that MNA does not represent Morningside as they say - they are not inclusive in the "meetings" and do not share the outcomes / recommendations freely with all of us potentially impacted. Thank you for your time & service. Kimberly Korb 4226 Alden Drive ORIGINAL QUALITY DOCUMENT Susan Howl Subject: A ten - year -old's perspective on out -of -scale houses Please enact a moratorium on tear downs while you figure out better parameters for small lots. The house to our south was demolished last month. We experienced 9 days of shaking, so much so that things were falling off our walls. Things broke. The house to our north, 4014 Lynn Avenue, is scheduled to be torn down next month, and the entire foundation will be removed. This will mean even more shaking. We are worried about our foundation and drainage issues, not to mention having 2 OUT -OF -SCALE houses on either side of us. The footprint for the 4014 Sicora house, goes to the maximum points in each direction, including up (the parameters meant for bigger lots). We are helpless, unless you stop the madness! Instead of having a backyard oasis, the majority of our view will be siding. i • �,�tl:r'/.°>t+3.�a- +�'�. -•1 *• rf'} ri'. �`•+ r_'. ���I. i' rr•' �3Li' i-�iP.'.S.P1::,'7?�IwrA•xr. -r.. •9. iL�'; •• : +t {hnt�•�.r.._1�.}r .. , ari.•rrw.•... :• -•... �.+_.t d-."�; �e : G••_y;. r „+,i r . Qvr,ten- year -old son; Gabe, wrote this letter; all on:Fiis own; after hearing tFiat the house to out- north -was goi g to -be �* • a J 1. •;�� _ �'< •• •�'. ,—• `. 'tip •' ,,. � y - .h . rt.._ , o,,. a 1 • ,r '•:.' 1.a rM �• ••:iL ' 1 � . -� -•3 •�•- 1 •- ri Yy I• � .. a � '�,.' ' 1 , J�'l t!�:.•r;a : r '. 1� ' . .. .Y.r .r {..�y •. ':1 ,. rr .. ;, Y? ' , . "f � '•1, +, •��' •T�' 'f .y'.1 u•r. � .4 ri •fir.. .,. .. !;C.: FA:� _ +sue ._ r .: j � .. '� . 5 y �.1 •� ,~ • ' n ' of a . z - ,1 °•' •. •+^S � � rys' r- �', 't• S ^�,••t r �Y rti�. i % '�:? •s •'�r�• - • t•i ' :.. ,� - S�'�.. • � � .t r..:: 'tip ' -rr'�-j' � ,,... � ti- - � �... _ .' �,. - �' a •'.•a •• "i, .1 ¢ f : 1. y r -'�; �S- i6'�._.� ' .. f . .� .y � `� �Y.�.'a r�y• '_ *.r ... •f •• �' F ... .t ter'. �F, -� ' h.. y � •d - � •,•L... - •'ti ;' "` -'' i � lam, I d F\ 1, �' �•' •y � r - -'• 1 •,•.r ....•.:. ••4 .. 1'� torn down.. y' c r Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:32 AM Subject: FW: A tax whose time has come ... This message has been forwarded to the City Council. - _Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952- 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastner(cbEdinaMN.00v i www.EdinaMN.00v �J ...For Living, 1.earninh, Raisina Families 6z Doing Business From: PAUL JAEHNERT ,[mailto•pjaehnert(@msn,com1 Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 1:34 PM Subject: A tax whose time has come ... A tax whose time has come ... Some members of Congress are proposing a tax on stock transactions. Such a tax would have very little impact on most of those buying and selling stocks because of proposed tax limitations on ordinary transactions. A stock transactions tax would incur extra costs mostly to those who are speculating by perpetually buying and selling the same stocks multiple times a day. It's what's known as 'churning'. Those engaged in that practice usually turn a small profit on each transaction, but make many millions on sheer weight of trading volume. I fail to see how churning benefits anyone but the speculators. Even though a stock transactions tax, as has been proposed, would be .0025 %, it would have negligible effect on most investors. It's estimated that a stock transactions tax would generate about $50 to $100 billion dollars a year in tax revenue -- no small piece of change! It would be nice to see such additional revenue go towards payment of our national debt instead of into the pockets of Wall Street speculators. - -Paul G. Jaehnert Susan Howl From: Emilie Kastner on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:33 AM Subject: FW: Airport This message has been forwarded to the City Council. Emilie Kastner, Communications Assistant 952 - 826 -0342 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ekastnerCd) Edina MN.gov_ I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kitty O'Dea Lmailto•kodea mn(@gmail.coml Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 12:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Airport To City Council I just watched the discussion regarding RNAV at City Council. Very productive discussion on the issues. I appreciate Council's continued vigilance on resolving this matter in an equitable way for the residents of Edina. Kitty O'Dea 1 residential architecture Mayor Hovland, Morningside is a wonderful place to call home: As a single M mother I've n the neighborhood was my found acceptance and kindness from and in my neigh bors Y 80 year old neighbor Penny Sandberg. Penny introduced me to the people on my block and to the Morningside Woman's club which is thriving due to its spirit and diversity. The ages of the woman's club run from women in their 30's to women in their 80's and 90's. I've found the development in Morningside troubling. Primarily because the new builds, thatLate the most notice, are the ones where existing homes (many of them solidly built) are raised. In their place are homes that do not fit into the context of the neighborhood. Many may see the existing homes in the neighborhood as vastly different in their styles, but I don't. I see them as solidly built, compact and neighborhood friendly. Even in their array they are consistent in their square footage with friendly because their front approximately 1,000 to 1,500 square foot footprints. They neighborhood scaled. Garages tend to be facades are composed of windows, doors and front porch es that are detached and in the rear yard, which keeps the mass of the home down. In the existing homes that have attached garages the portion of the front fagade that is associated with the garage door is a smaller ends to occur on lots deep portion of the whole. This also only t s and lots that are deeper, a have heedched garage. Meaning lots that are wider have attached garage garages. If, as in many of the new builds, the lot is narrow and the garage is on the front the garage dominates the home and provides a fagade that isn't humanely scaled. Typically the existing homes aren't very deep, or wide, which allows fight to penetratrPlhan how can the home be usedswes dv'o concentrate on how much square footage can be built, rather resulting in cost per square foot reasoning, rather than quality per square foot reasoning. The end result is houses that are massive in comparison to the neighborhood and in roofs that are overly dominant because of the "thickness" of the footprint. Susan Susanka has written a series of books based upon the "not so big house" which concentrate on quality rather than quantity. This brings me to the other t bothering on the task for about issue; a lot force I admire, of energy has been spent on the builders. Although there thing g builder focusing on the builders for this issue is a bit like asking the os? The MN AIA has many resources fore been a task force comprised of Architects or community Planners? us to use, such as the Minnesota Design team, who "use community development principles to help Minnesota communities develop and act upon a shared vision for their future" or the Residential Architecture committee. There are also many architects in the community that have done wonderful work with the existing housing stock and new builds that would have just as much to say on this matter. What is most frustrating is hearing builders say "This is what the client wants" The conversation an architect has with a client goes much deeper than that. Many clients are in this process for the first time and aren't aware of the consequences. As an architect we discuss the ramifications of design decisions and decide together on the best course of action. The goal for an architect is to build well, not just build. I've also heard builders say that architects are expensive, but this isn't so. I have personally helped with remodels where the client is very pleased with the result, have homes that fit today's lifestyles and have spent significantly less than what new builds sell for. I know of other architects that have designed in this neighborhood in the same way. I hope you'll reach out to the design community as well in this discussion. I've also heard some builders say that quality sells well, and that does make me hopeful, as I also believe that is true. This is a difficult concept to get across, but Edina has been known for quality, rather than size, for quite some time and I'd like this idea to transfer over to our housing stock as well. There are few areas where I can afford to, or want to live, in Edina. Morningside is one of them. The mix of people here is across the board. There are artists, entertainers, scientists, engineers, politicians and educators. Cities thrive because of the creativity, knowledge and exchange of ideas. Richard Florida writes in "The rise of the creative class and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life." that this mix of people and ideas is creating a new social class, one in which communities attract the kind of business and people that make cities strong. It's my personal belief that the quality of the community is better for our future rather than the quantity of money that is being used on our housing stock. My hope is that we take the time to foster quality growth rather than quantity growth. Sincerely, Meriwether Felt Meriwether, Inc 4116 Grimes Ave So Edina, MN 55416 Cc: City Council and Planning Department via e-mail Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2.013 8:32 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Calvin Christian School revenue bond proposal �- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist iV=: 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 _ Ibiunno -EdinaMN.gov l www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families &Doing Business From: Steven 1. Timmer Lmailto •stimmer(aplanetlawyers.coml Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 4:33 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Calvin Christian School revenue bond proposal Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council, When this issue came up before, I appeared before the Council and opposed the idea of using City bonding capacity for the request on both policy and constitutional grounds. I also wrote a follow -up email that is probably floating around somewhere. Now, I understand, the school has come back with a different proposal; it has apparently found another municipality willing to issue the bonds. This makes the idea less objectionable, I suppose, on policy grounds. Why some other municipality wants to get involved in this is something I frankly don't understand, but I'm not a council member there. I still harbor great constitutional reservations about Edina stamping its imprimatur on this at any level of involvement, cooperation, or support. The school is a plainly sectarian operation, highly integrated with the Reformed Church. It is open, as I understand, only to children of Christian parents. The legal authority that the City's bond counsel referred to at the last hearing about this struck me as very shaky. The private college involved in that case and the school in the present situation are vastly different and distinguishable things. If the City want to pursue this, it must, in my view, have an ironclad opinion from the City's bond counsel, not merely counsel from the school. It should recite the facts relied on in considerable detail and be free of material disclaimers. Indemnities from the other parties ought to be considered as well, including for counsel fees that may well arise out of First Amendment litigation over this. Remember, even the case used as authority was litigated, not doubt at considerable expense to the parties. I cannot be at the meeting tomorrow evening, or I would make these remarks in person. With warm regards to all, Steve Steve Timmer stimmerPPIanetlawyers.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:03 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Grand opening Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cbEdinaMN.gov l www.EdinaMN.gov -� - ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Julie Simmons jmai Ito: J Sim monObchuckanddons.coml Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Grand opening Good morning! I am writing to you to let you know that we just opened up our 191h Chuck & Don's location in Minnesota on Monday March 4th in the Yorkdale Shoppes. We have grand opening plans scheduled for Saturday April 20th and would love to have a city representative available to part take in the ribbon cutting honors. The ribbon cutting is schedule to happen at 10am and will include our business owners Chuck Anderson and Bob Hartzell. Do you have a city representative available for the time that you could commit to the event? Thanks! Julie Simmons Chuck & Don's Pet Food Outlet isimmons@chuckanddons.com I From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:08 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Morningside proposal Attachments: MNA subcommittee residential zoning code.pdf Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cD Edina MN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Bti5ine,s From: tony(cbtchomebuildersinc.com jmailto •tony(a)tchomebuildersinc.coml Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:05 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2Cacomcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshspraguePedinarealty,com; swensonannl()gmail.com; Cary Teague Subject: Morningside proposal To Whom It May Concern, I rarely speak up to my City council members, Mayor and city planners, but as a 40 year resident and working builder in the city of Edina I have to say this, lastest proposal by the Morningside people is something that should not even be looked at. I'm not sure if their trying to gets us back to being called the Village of Edina or what. I think the planning commision has done a good job of reworking the home scale in our city, its the strictest one around. As aeworking builder I have done alot of homes for professionals that I enjoy having as neighbors. I'm constantly fighting to try and get more of these professionals to live in our city. They bring their ideas,their intellect, higher tax base and they make great neighbors. I'm not sure about you, but as a forty year resident I believe they make a safer neighbor as well. What this group of people are proposing will make these professionals go away. I think you need to talk to the older genera! tion of Edina neighbors and ask them their thoughts, not just what the new people want. Thank you for your time. Tony Giannakakis TC Homebuilders Inc. 952 926 6100 To: Edina City Council and Planning Commission From: Morningside Neighborhood Association subcommittee Re: Residential zoning code Date: February 28, 2013 The Morningside Neighborhood Association held a neighborhood conversation on residential reconstruction in October zoiz. More than 5o residents attended. The steering committee prepared a summary of the meeting, which was distributed in November (attached), and formed a subcommittee to follow up on the discussion. The subcommittee focused its attention on residential zoning code and the Construction Management Plan (CMP). Our recommendations on the CMP were distributed to the PlanningCommission and City Council on February 5, 2013. The attached recommendations relate to the City's residential zoning code. These recommendations were developed by the subcommittee and are currently being reviewed by the steering committee. The process used by the subcommittee to develop these recommendations included: • Reviewed residential zoning code of Edina and other communities; • Met with five builders (Dan Murphy of Kuhl Design and Build, Dave Allen of City Homes, Lon Oberpriller of Replacement Homes, Dave Pinske of David Pinske Design and Build, and Mike Pearson and Morningside Builders); • Met with Cary Teague and Kris Aaker in Planning and Community Development; • Met with Steve Kirchman in Building Inspections; • Met with members of the Planning Commission subcommittee on residential zoning; • Attended both public input sessions on residential construction; • Additional small group and individual meetings with interested residents In any discussion on.residential zoning, there are likely to be a variety of views. There are residents who want to see more restrictive residential zoning code and residents who do not. Our goal was to balance these divergent perspectives and make practical recommendations that not only address the concerns raised at the October meeting, but also simplify the code and plan review. We would be happy to meet to go over the recommendations and answer any of your questions. Please contact us at Thank you. P RECOMMENDATIONS— Lots less than 75' wide, unless specified The following recommendations apply to lots less than 75' wide, unless specified. For background on the issues these recommendations will address, please see the October 2012 MNA meeting summary. Increase interior side yard setback Recommendations i. For lots 63' wide and less: i6' aggregate, with 6' minimum on one side For lots 64'– 66' feet wide: 16' aggregate, with 7' minimum on one side For lots 67'– 69' wide: 8' each side (16') For lots 70'– 7z' wide: 9' each side (18') For lots 73' wide and over: lo' each side (zo') z. Apply same interior side yard setbacks to attached garages and other attached accessory structures 3. Delete requirement to increase interior side yard setback by six inches for each one foot building height exceeds 15' (lots 9,000 sq. ft. and less only) 4. Delete requirement to increase interior side yard setback by four inches for each one foot lot width exceeds 6o' (up to 75') 5. Delete alternate setback rule Benefits 1. Increases minimum interior side yard setbacks on narrow lots z. Addresses resident concerns 3. Flexibility on narrowest lots 4. Simplifies setbacks simplifies plan review 5. Increases transparency and neighbor notification by requiring all non - conformities to seek variance See tables next page 2 Table i Table i Current Interior Side Yard Setbacks Proposed Interior Side Yard Setbacks Lot Width Current Interior Side Yard Setback' 6o' and under 5' each side 61' 5'4" each side 62' 5' 8" each side 63, 6' each side 64' 6'4" each side 65' 6' 8" each side 66' 7' each side 67, 7' 4" each side 68' 7' 8" each side 69, 8' each side 701 8'4" each side 711 8' 8" each side 72 9' each side 73' 9' 4" each side 74' 9' 8" each side 75' and over io' each side 'Does not include additional setback for building height over 15' Lot Width Proposed Interior Side Yard Setback 63' and under 16' aggregate, with 6' minimum 64'- 66' 16' aggregate, with 7' minimum 67' - 69' 8' each side (16') 70' - 7z' 9' each side (18') 73' and over lo' each side (zo') 3 Reduce building height Recommendations 1. Cap at 30' to the ridge, measured from the first floor elevation z. Delete measurement to mid line Benefits 1. Decreases overall building height to reduce mass and impact on neighboring properties z. Simplifies measurement — height is measured from a constant (first floor elevation rather than average grade. Code prohibiting raising first floor more than 1' to stay) 3. Simplifies code and plan review — eliminates complexity of measuring to midline on different roof styles Reduce lot coverage The majority of original homes in Morningside were constructed before 197o. Lots were platted for the size of home built or anticipated to be built at the time of the plat. In 195o, the average size of a single family home was 983 sq. ft. In 2o11, the average size of a single family home was 2,480 sq. ft. —a 152 %'increase.' A new home in Morningside can be two or more times larger than the home it replaced. The smaller the lot, the greater the possible impact of the larger house on its neighbors. The impacts most often stated are loss of light, air, and privacy, and drainage concerns. Recommendations on lots less than 9,000 sq. ft. in area: 1. Reduce lot coverage to 215% (making it the same as for lots 9,000 sq. ft. and over) z. Cap lot coverage at 1,875 sq. ft. (in practice, applies only to lots more than 7,5000 sq. ft. and less than 9,000 sq. ft.) 3. Allow bonus 400 sq. ft. for detached rear garage Benefits 1. Small reduction in lot coverage with attached garage z. No reduction in lot coverage with bonus for detached garage See Tables 4 - 7' ' http: / /css.snre .umich.edu /css_doc /CSSol- o8.pdf 4 J _.O/ 1.Y .�•Y�� Table 4 - Lompanson vi Sul- anu - ,-,- -. • - b- z5% Difference Dimension Area 30% 5o x 100 5,000 1,500 1,250 -250 50. x �z0 6,000 1,800 1,500 -300 50 x 150 7,500 2,250 1,875 -375 50 x zoo 10,000 NA 2,500 0 6o x loo 6,000 1,8o0 11500 -300 6o x 120 7,200 2,160 1,800 -36o 6o x 150 9,000 NA 2,250 0 6o x zoo 12,000 NA 3,000 0 70 x 100 7,000 2,100 1,750 -350 70 x 120 8,400 2,520 (2,250 2,100 -150 with cap) 70 x 150 10,500 NA 2,625 0 70 x zoo 14,000 NA 3,500 _, __J 0 , �, A 'Lot coverage is "the percentage of the jot area ULLUYI CU 1%y PI II1 -1-1 uj l- •' "`""v % -- - 0- - -- structures, including without limitation, patios." Lot coverage can, but does not necessarily, equal interior square footage. PI Table 5 - 25% lot covers a with Area 1,875 cap and 25 %' bonus 400 sq. 1,875 Cape Ti. TOI- ueLau,cu 400 sq. ft. Sa, obi Lot Dimension garage coverage bonus with bonus 50 x 100 5,000 1,250 NA 1,650 33% 50 x 120 6,000 1,500 NA 1,900 32% 50 x 150 7,500 1,875 NA 2,275 30% 50 x zoo 10;000- 6,000 2,500 1,500 NA NA NA 1,900 25% 32% 6o x ioo 6o x izo 7,200 1,800 NA 2,200 31% 6o x 150 9,000 2,250 NA NA 25% 6o x zoo 1z,000 3,000 NA NA 65 x loo 6,500 1,625 NA 2,025 65 x izo 7;800 1,95 0 1875 U,'%/- 65 x 150 9,750 2,438 NA NA 65 x zoo 13,000 3,250 NA NA 'For lots 9,0oo sq. ft. and over, current lot coverage is z5Ib. 'For lots more than 7,500 sq. ft. but less than 9,000 sq. ft. in area, current cap is 2,250 sq. ft. 313onus applies to lots less than 9,000 sq. ft. 4 2 Table 6 - Dt Dimension 50 x too 50 x 150 50 x 200 65 x 100 65 x 150 65 x zoo 70 x 100 70 x 150 70 x 200 've1D 117CI I IL VIC,, llal - -��. �.... First z z "d S Second. T Two Area L Lot F coverage' s setback f floor f floor f floor s story potenti s setback p potential p potential2 al 5,000 1 1,500 5 5'15 1 1,500 v varies v varies < <3,000 7,500 2 2,250 5 5'15' 2 2,250 v varies v varies < <4,500 10,00 2 2,500 5 5'15' 2 2,250 v varies v varies < <5,000 0 6,500 1 1,950 6 6' 8 "16'.8" 1 1,950 v varies v varies < <3,900 9,750 2 2,437 6 6' 8 1116' 8" 2 2,437 v varies v varies < <4,874 13,00 3 3,250 6 6' 8 "16' 8" 3 3,250 v varies v varies < <6,500 0 7,000 1 1,750 8 8' 4 "18' 4" 1 1,750 v varies v varies < <3,500 10,50 2 2,625 8 8'4y'/8' 4" 2 2,625 v varies v varies < <5,250 0 14,00 3 3,500 8 8' 4 1118' 4" 3 3,500 v varies v varies < <7,000 0 25% for 9,000 sq. ft. and over; 30% for under 9,000 sq. ft. Does not inc u e ase ,A A- 1 aDle / - uevew n,c„, Dimension Area Lot Detached First floor First 2 floor Second Two coverage garage setback floor setback floor story 25% bonus potential potential potential' 50 x 100 5,000 1,250 400 16' wl 6' 1,250 16'w/ 6' 1,250 2,500 . min min plus 400 50 x 150 7,500 1,875 400 16' wl 6' 1,875 16' wl 6' 1,875 3,750 min min lus 400 50.X zoo 10,000 2,500 NA 16' wl 6' . 2,500 16' wl 6' 2,500 5,000 min min 65 x 100 6,500 1,625 400 16' vvl 7' 1,625 16' wl 7' 1,625 3,250 min min lus 400 65 x 150 9,750 2,437 NA 16' w/ 7' 2,437 16'W/ 7' 2,437 4,874 min min 65 x 200 13,000 3,250 NA 16' wl 7' 3,250 16'W/ 7' 3,250 6,500 min min 70 x 100 7,000 1,750 400 9'19' 1,750 9'19' 1,750 3,500 lus 400 70 x 150 10,500 2,625 NA 9'19' 2,625 9'19' 2,625 5,250 70 x zoo 14,000 3,500 NA 9'19' 3,500 9'19' 3,500 7,000 ' Does not include basement 7 ' Does not include basement 7 Require on -site access to backyard Recommendation 1. Require unobstructed on -site access to backyard from one side of house Benefits i. Reduces impacts on neighboring properties z. Provides access to home and yard for maintenance Protect trees Recommendation 1. Develop comprehensive tree protection, preservation and replacement ordinance Benefits 1. Preserve and improve urban forest z. Preserve neighborhood character 3. Reduce impacts on neighboring properties Address drainage concerns Recommendation 1. Stronger code and plan review Recommendation 1. Reduce impacts on neighboring properties z. Reduce volume of untreated stormwater that goes into storm sewer and local creeks, ponds and lakes Encourage garages that do not dominate front facade Recommendations 1. Increased interior side yard setbacks and 400 sq. ft. bonus for detached garage provide incentive to locate garage at rear of the house 2. Neighborhood character guidelines can define garage styles that are keeping with the neighborhood character (these can include not only detached rear garages, but also side loading, set back, and front loading garages that take up less than a set percentage of the front facade) 3. Administrative site plan review can award points for garage styles that have desirable design features Benefits 1. Addresses resident concerns 8 Recommendation 1. Develop guidelines for neighborhood character with input from neighborhood task force Neighborhood character can be difficult to define, especially in a neighborhood that was developed over a long period. Morningside was platted in 1905 and original homes developed over most of the century. When thinking about features that define neighborhood character, it is important to understand that a feature does not need to be pervasive for it to be considered a defining characteristic. For example, we've heard many residents comment that they feel front loading garages are out of character. Yet, the neighborhood has many original homes with front loading garages. We've heard that the size of some new homes is out of scale with the neighborhood. Yet, there are several large original homes with square footage that may equal the new homes. It is therefore important to think of neighborhood character in two ways: the physical features that dominate an area and the features that dominate people's perceptions of an area. They may be the same thing in some cases, but in others they may not. The following features generally define neighborhood character in Morningside. The list is offered as a starting point to a longer discussion on neighborhood character and development of guidelines. • Mature trees • Sidewalks • Larger homes on larger lots, smaller homes on smaller lots • Larger homes with traditional two -story architecture, often brick or stucco, garages set back or at rear of home • Garage doors do not dominate front fa4ade Benefits 1. Addresses resident concerns 2. Strengthens neighborhood identity Institute administrative site plan review Recommendation 1. Develop an administrative site plan review process similar to that used by the City of Minneapolis (attached) The plan identifies desirable design elements and assigns points to them. Builders choose which design elements to include in their project to earn the 9 required number of points. This gives the builder flexibility while encouraging desirable design elements that may not be specified in code. The design elements can be tailored for specific neighborhoods to help to preserve neighborhood character. The design elements or site features can also provide incentives for tree preservation and replacement, green building practices, increased energy efficiency, reductions in impervious surfaces or other features deemed desirable. Benefits 1. Alternative to citizen design review board z. Flexibility — builders and homeowners can choose which elements to incorporate into design 3. Design elements can be neighborhood- specific, without requiring additional zoning or overlay district SUMMARY The above recommendations offer trade -offs. In exchange for greater interior side yard setbacks, setbacks do not have to be stepped back for building height above 15', allowing for more traditional two -story architecture, more second floor square footage, and less complexity in plan review. In exchange for reduced height to the ridge, height is measured from the first floor elevation, rather than the average front yard grade, reducing mass and simplifying plan review. In exchange for reduced lot coverage, builders are given a bonus if they locate a detached garage at the rear, bringing lot coverage back up to and over 30%. See comparison table attached. Any changes have the potential for unintended consequences. For this reason, we recommend that any proposed changes be modeled and tested against real life examples. These recommendations are intended to work together. The recommendations should also be considered in conjunction with our earlier recommendations to refine the CMP, which address issues such as neighbor notification, site conditions, construction traffic and other concerns raised at the October meeting. Please excuse any errors in calculations. 10 Dimension Area Lot coverage Lot Lot Lot Interior side Interior . side yard Max height Max height percentage coverage coverage sq.ft. coverage sq.ft. yard setback setback current proposed current percentage proposed current proposed current' proposed (with bonus 50 x 100 5,000 30% 25 %+ 1,500 1,250 5'15' 16' w16' 35' 3 0° bonus (1,650) min. 50 x 150 7,500 30% 25 %+ 2,250 1,875 5'15' 16' wl 6' 35' 30, bonus 2,275 min. 50 x zoo 10,000 25% 25% 3,000 2,500 5'15' 16 w16' 35' 30' (2,900) min. , 65 x 100 6,500 30% 25 %+ 1,950 1,625 6' 8 "16' 16' w17' 35' 3 0' bonus 2,025 8" min. 65 x 150 9,750 25% Y 25% z 2,438 2,438 6' 8 "16' 16' w17' 35 30, 8" min. 65 x zoo 13,000 25% 25% 3,25° 3,25° 6' 8 "16' 16' w17' 35' 30, 8" min. 7,000 30% 25 %+ 2,100 1,750 8'4"/8' 9'19' 35' 3 0' 70 x 100 bonus 2,150 4 70 x 150 10,500 25% 25% 2,625 2,625 8'4"/8' 9'19' 35' 30' 4" 70 x zoo 14,000 25% 25% 3,500 3,500 8' 4 "18' 9'19' 35' 30' 4" X1 -A- ­+k—le fnr aarh fnnt 'Base 5115' setback, plus additional Tour incnes Tor eau, iwL wi .� -- • - -- - building height exceeds 15'. Table 8— Summary New residences containing.,1A dwelling units A GUIDE TO a ` shall I obtain aiminimurn of 15 points from Site 'Plan Review: the categories illustrated be ow. DesignS must also comply w ith the standards included in Reside Applicability. Residential Point System (1-4 units) Chapter, 535, Regulations of General L MMI.K.M., V �Mlx P At least one parking space The pitch of th s e primary roof �At least -io% of the walls or, At leapt 20r,,`bf the walk -ovided in an enclosed line is 6/1-2 or steepeeach. r (or floor that face a fear on each floor that face a is pi here is a r interior side not includina garacle that is detached from less-sf e&.p or flat if t e lot line, public st.ree.1,,i are icr \!,jalls on half walls on half stories,, it,je n-ia6n,strL1CWre. roof of sirnilar pitch within icio not, illClUdirg feet). stories; arc. vllinclovvs. windows. ". POINTS POINTS POINTS POINTS no .a 4; p The prirriary exterior The structure ihcludes a The structure includes an There is at least one de CidLIOLIS tree building materials are :;basernent as defined by the open-air,,cov&red front in the front yard. porck'6f at least .7a square: masonry, brick, stone, build;ng,cocle. . I I : : e, feet if th:e're is at least one Stucco; N-Vood,, cement - en front ng op on t porch based siding, and/or glass. existi within lo,D feet of the site. 4 POINTS POINTS POINT 'POINT . 5 ACCESSIBILITY Designs that offer certain accessibility features will receive point bonuses that allow them to bypass Some of tl-iese BONUSE� requirements while still fulfilling the 15-point n -iinirnurn. FOR MORE INFORMATION Consult the Site Plan Review Chapter 53o, Article VI of the City's Zoning C,ci& online at city of minneapolis http: / /www.minneapolismn.gov /government /ordinances asp 2d Center for Sustainable Systems Residential Buildings llnNersity I,i t•.4lchigan 44p Church Slieel Ann .lrhor. 1'1 4F109 -107! Phone- 734.; 64. 14 12 email. css.irl'o n;u, uch. :: Patterns of Use Proven climate- specific, resource - efficient house design strategies exist, but per capita materials and energy consumption continue to increase. additionally, between 1950 and 1990, urbanized land expansion grew at a rate 3 times the rate of population growth.' Size and Occupancy Average Size of a New U.S. Single - Family House' ,� majority of americans live in single - family houses — in 2011, 64% of the 115 million U.S. households were single - family.'- Some 1970 2011 unsustainable residential building trends to consider: 1,500 ft 2 2,480 ft2 Average size of a new U.S. single -family house 23 1950 983 ft'- 1970 1,500 ft'- 2000 2,200 ft'- 2011 2,480 ft'- a 152% increase from 1950 Average area per person in a new U.S. single -family house'- - 1950 292 ft' per person - 1970 478 ft- per person - 2000 840 ft- per person 2011 961 ft-' per person a 229% increase from 1950 Average number of occupants per U.S. household2,4 1950 3.37 1970 3.14 2011 2.58 a 23% decrease from 1950 • In 1950, 9% of housing units were occupied by only one person. In 2009, this had increased to 27 %.5 • americans spend, on average, 90% of their time indoors." Energy Use ■ � new single - family house in Miclvgan — as studied in 1998 by CSS — consumes 1.3 G] per square meter annually. •g ■ A similar study of 3 houses in Sweden built in the 1990's shows annual energy consumption of 0.49 — 0.56 GJ per square meter — less than half the energy consumed in the Michigan house-9 ■ Between 1990 and 2010, total residential GHG emissions increased by 28.7% while population increased by only 249/6.j11 ■ The residential sector accounted for 22% of total primary energy consumption in the US in 2011.11 See figure on right for a breakdown of energy consumption by activity. 65% i.._....g 0........6 Increase Average U.S. Residential Energy Consumption in 2010' Space Cooling, 16% Lighting, 10% t, 4 ., Refrigeration. 5% t A r Color Televisions, ' WelerHealirig f 5% 13% :,_ {'; Clothes Dryers, 3% Cooking, 3% Dishwashers, 1% —Freezers, 1% Space Healing, \ Personal 25 %' `Compute s. 3% other Uses, 14% I l Furnace Fans, 2% Clothes Washers. o% ' Rusk, D. (1990( Inside 60mc (Jtrl It, lL' (;tone H'immng .l'n Irgies Ito Sming IMmn Amcrcn, Washington, D C Bookings institution Press. ' National Assonavon of Home Builders (2007) Housing 1•oc/r, Figrves and T w,di and.Single-1•hmilt•.Square Fnomge Br location, U.S. Census Bureau, and Wilson. A. and J. Boehland (21)05) °Small is Beautiful, U.S House Size, Resource Use, and the Environment" dm,roal nJlmhat ial L•ca109P. Vol 9, Na 1-2.277-287. ' U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Characteristics of Neur Hm+sing 2011 and American Comm nit), Horsing .Sunr0009. ' U.S. Census Bureau, Curivni populraion .Survey. 2011 Anm+al Social and Economic Supplement 'U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Census of Housing, Tables Living Alone (2004) and (2010) 2009 American Camm+ni0, Survey. ° Wilson, S. (201)4) "Design for Health: Summit for Massachusetts Health Care Decision Makers." Presentation September 2004. ' Blanchard, S. and P. Reppe (1998) Life Cycle Anal rcis oft Residential Home in Michigan (CSS98 -05). 135.156. (CSS00.11). ' Keoleien, G.A, S. Blanchard and P. Reppe (2001) "Life Cycle Energy, Costs, and Strategies for Improving a Single Family House ",.lm+rnal of Industrial EcoloRV 4(2), p. ° Adalberth, K. (1997) "Energy use during the Life Cycle of Single -Unit Dwellings: Examples" Building and Emironmem, Vol. 32, No. 4, 321 -329. EPA (2012) hm ntnrrn of U.S. Grecnhouse Gas Emissinns and Sinks: 1990- 2010. " U.S. DOE, Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2012) Annual Energy Review 2011. '= El A (2011),4t nl Energy nmlook 2011. ComO:r�� S6: o` t'sctst ?eat; <htipalcsasnro.umich.edu> Life Cycle impacts The Center for Sustainable Systems conducted a case study to inventory life -cycle energy consumption from manufacturing, construction and operational phases of a new 3,450 fr- single - family house built in .inn :arbor in 1998. The following o ff - the -shelf energy efficiency strategies were then modeled to quantify the resulting life -cycle energy savings? ■ Wall and ceiling insulation increased from R -15 to R -35 and R -23 to R -49 respectively; building infiltration (leakage) reduced by half ■ Wooden basement walls instead of concrete; basement thermal insulation increased 'lryi from R -12 to R -39 ' `, ■ Double - glazed windows upgraded to include low -e treatment and argon fill E ■ Energy- efficient appliances; stove & dryer switched from electricity to natural g as ¢f 2 Energy- efficient lighting (fluorescent) ■ Building- integrated shading (overhangs) on south - facing windows ~' ®® I` .4 tkY .� p, Hot -water heat recover ;, A• -* �.. to -air heat recovery used with ventilation system ■ Glass fiber thermal insulation replaced with recycled cellulose Recycled- materials roofing shingles (wood /plastic) ■ The case study house required 172 tons of concrete? and 24 tons of wood and wood products." ■ 90% of the life cycle energy consumption occurred during operation; only 10% went into building and maintaiivng the house. ibutors to the primary energy consumption of the case study house were polyamide for carpet, concrete in foundation, PVC ■ Top contr for siding, window £runes and pipes, and asphalt roofing shingles. ■ 75% of the materials in the case study house are currently recyclable?; however, the U.S. average recycling rate of building materials from demolition and construction is only 20- 30 %.13 ■ A 63% building life -cycle energy reduction was achieved through the above measures, all with readily available technologyh Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions were reduced from 1,013 to 374 metric tons COQ- equivalent, over the 50 year life of the house. ■ Despite the additional material requirements, the total embodied energy was reduced by about 4 9/0. ■ Installing high efficiency HVAC system and cellulose insulation ranked as the most effective strategies in reducing annual energy costs. Solutions and Sustainable Alternatives Reduce operational demand of the home From a life -cycle perspective, energy and water consumption during the life of a building contribute much more to its environmental impact than do building materials. The following suggestions can significantly reduce operational energy demand: ■ Use passive heating methods — passive solar, waste heat from disposed hot water. ■ 'Make use of passive cooling — night- flushing, shading. ■ Add ceiling fans, and the A/C can be comfortably set about 5 degrees higher. ■ Maximize day lighting — skylights, south facing windows. ■ Consider decentralized, "passive" sanitary services — compost toilet, living machine, rainwater use for toilets, greywater for gardening. ■ ? Convert appliances from electric to natural gas, reducing primary energy consumption by about 75 % ■ Install a low -flow showerhead — less than 2.5 gallons- per - minute — to save both water and energy. ■ Save 40% of hot water heating energy with a simple wastewater heat exchanger. 7 ■ Adequate insulation — recorrunended R- values can be calculated online at: http: / /%vwnv.ornl.gov /—roofs /Zip /ZipHol-ne.html. ■ Many energy efficient home upgrades, if installed before 2012, are still eligible for federal tax credits: HVAC systems, insulation, roofing, water heaters, and windows and doors. Some renewable energy systems also qualify through 2016. Please see: http: / /www. energ),sa\,ers.gov/ financial /70010.html.14 Select durable'andlor renewable materials Building materials with long lives may have greater upfront cost, but long term savings and reduced environmental impact are achieved 1)), avoiding replacement. Renewable building materials also offer potential environmental advantages. r ■ Durables to consider: cork or ±; r ��� �.�' rye . r hardwood vs. carpet, standing -seam - � ?� �'�ir•r �°� __ roofing vs. asphalt shingles --k r 17uf�y, ■ Renewables to consider: cork,�r�?< linoleum, wool carpet, certified K wood and plywood, strawboard, J 11 cellulose insulation, straw -bale NO, F ■ Substituting asphalt shingle roofing with recycled plastic /wood fiber - -- shingles can reduce embodied Photo Courtesy of http: l/ www. smeumich .edu/greendmalgreen_meteriels. energy by 98% over 50 years. 7 . ... __.. .......... -' U.S. EPA (1499) Chnrrn.'n•ri.nri,x, ufAuilJinl'- Relined Cunarnrcrinn arnl Oc )'-Ener y saye in the Il n Strvinras Energy M EPA9 tom - �, g hnsuleuon html u' U.S. Department of Energy. Energy Etiiciency end ReneweHe Energy (20061 "Energy Savers'.'fips on Sevmg Fsergy 8 Money at Home. insulation hnp�liwswl ecre ever ovhonsumedu ps Cite as' Cenlei for Susiama°le Sysietns. Unrversily of Michigan. 2072 "ResidenGa! 8ur;drnas Facisneef Put' Mo CSSUt -Ud Oclouer «01: Morningsidw Morningside has ahvays been a wciconvng community, wrath diverse housing styles —from early 20th century bungalows, post war Crape Cods, 1960s & 70s ramblers, to today's larger suburban - styled homes. The benefits of residential reconstruction in the neighborhood are many. Residential reconstruction: • Renews housing stock and adds to the diversity of housing styles in Morningside • Attracts new residents to Morningside • Has the potential to raise property values • Increases the City's tax base _ i %,.c l.� ,. c—t t—•� r -:4 r..c :- L. .. .�I. 'it F" 3,:1 i,. F.— �.k ^): 7..� . Avariety of concerns were raised at the 2012 MNA Annual Meeting during a discussion on residential reconstruction. For the most part, these concerns are related to the impact of residential reconstruction on neighboring properties from the perspective of those who have been impacted. Some concerns are related to building styles and neighborhood character. As the below notes show, many concerns and their impacts are inter- related. _<rtj+t :';4 "- FF.r��iC- �tE ^I� 5,��+r.J' E'•�� >�'!`��iw...�i Changes to side or rear yard elevation, lot grade or land contours • Can result in removal of trees and vegetation • Can change patterns of surface water runoff and drainage • Can impact building height • Can increase visual mass • Can changee sun /shade cyclee on adjacent properties • (:an reduce privacy in adjacent homes or yards Changes to lot coverage, setback, or how home is located on the lot • Can change neighborhood character • Can increase visual mass • Can result in tree removal • Can change sun /shade cycle on adjacent properties • Can impact air circulation • Can reduce privacy in adjacent homes or yards Changes to surface water runoff and drainage • Can direct water to adjacent properties • Can cause standing water, flooding, erosion, and property damage Retaining walls at lot line • Can require access from adjacent properties to build and maintain Tree removal • Can change neighborhood character, natural aesthetics • Can alter sun /shade cycles on adjacent properties • Can reduce privacy in adjacent homes and yards Window wells to lot line • Can prevent homeowner from accessing own backyard from o�vn property • Can create potenti al safety issues �tiath children, vehicles on adjacent driveways Homes with no outside access to back yard • Can result in use of neighboring property to access, with or without permission • Potential for issues with adverse possession and homeowner liability Changes in sun /shade cycles on adjacent properties • Can change thaw /freeze cycles • Can impact gardens and landscaping • Can reduce or increase light in interior living spaces • Can reduce or increase need for mechanical heating and cooling Changes to air circulation • Can impact comfort and interior air quality • Can reduce or increase need for mechanical lieating and cooling Changes to privacy • Can create need for fence:, landscaping, or window coverings • C:an impact how neighboring property owners use and enjoy their propern Changes to traffic patterns, vehicle access, and parking • Can impact neighborhood livability • Can create concerns about safety • Construction vehicles blocking access to driveways or making it difficult for other vehicles to get through • NX'ear and tear on roadways from construction vehicles and construction activities • N oise • Construction activ. ties seven days a week • Sidewalks torn up and /or not maintained in winter • Neighbors not sure who they should contact about questions or complaints; some experienced City staff and /or builder not responsive to concerns What does City code say about residential reconstruction? • Perception drat City code is inadequate to protect neighboring properties and neighborhood character in the areas of: building height or rooflincs • setbacks (especially window wells and eaves) lot coverage • grading, elevation and drainage • garages at the front • penalties for violations 2 Hov many variances are granted? • Perception that some recently built homes have required variances and that variances are easy to obtain What code or policy changes related to residential reconstruction are currently being discussed? How do residents advocate for code or policy changes? What other strategies or practices does the City have to address concerns about residential reconstruction? • Perception that plan review and inspection practices sometimes tai] to etch code violations related to building height, setbacks, lot coverage, grading, elevation and drainage Perception that, when code violations related to the above are caught after construction has begun, current practices do not require the builder to take corrective action • Perception that this contributes to some builders intentionally violating code What can be done to protect a property from construction activities or new construction on a nearby or adjacent lot? About SO residents attended the discussion on residential reconstruction held as part of the 2012 NINA Annual Meeting. The goal of this discussion was to give residents an opportunity: to share experiences, and identify questions and concerns related to residential reconstrucrir�n in the neighborhood. In any discussion on residential reconstruction, there are lilcel\7 to be a variety of views. The Steering Comnvttee hopes to hear from as mane residents as possible on this issue. Whether you are a new or longtime Morningside resident, whether you live in an original, remodeled, or rebuilt home, your perspective is valuable. To comment on this summary, share your experience, or ask a question, please email the MNA Steering Committee at edina.morningside @gmail.com. The Steering Committee will share this summary and any new input with City, officials and ask for responses to the questions and concerns that have been raised. The Steering Committee will also work to schedule a neighborhood meeting VL7itl1 City officials to identify and discuss action steps that can be. taken in response to these concerns. Information will be posted on the NINA website and distributed via the NNA email list. The Nforni.ngside Neighborhood Association (NINA) .vas formed at a neighborhood meeting on November 9, 2003. The purpose of the ASIA is to promote a better community through group action, to promote involvement in decisions made by local government, and to represent the interests of all residents and property owners in the Morningside Neighborhood. Activities of the NINA are guided by a Steering Comnuttee, elected each October at the Annual Meeting. 2012 -2013 Steering Committee members are: Nfindy Ahler (Crocker), I -lelen Burke (Grimes), 1\Iary Carte (Branson), Pat Corcoran (I\-Ionterey), Susan Danz] (Lynn), Jennifer Janovy (Inglewood), Kay Johnson (Oakdale). Tim Rudnicki (Lynn), Scott Smith (TVlorningside Road), and Paul Thompson (Crocker). For more information, please see wv,lv.edinamorningside.org or email edina.morningside @gmiail.c.om. © 2012 Morningside Neighborhood Association _s_ Deb Mangen From: Joni Bennett <jonibennett12 @corncast.net> Sent Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:15 PM To: Deb Mangen Subject Fwd: Steve Timmer letter March 3, 2008 re: Calvin Christian School HRA revenue bond proposal Good Afternoon, Deb - Steven Timmer sent an email to the Council yesterday referring to the letter below. Would you please have copies of this for the Council at this evening's meeting? Thank you - Joni Begin forwarded message: From: "Jennifer Bennerotte" <JBennerotte(c_ci.edina.mn.us> Date: March 4, 2008 2:23:56 PM CST Cc: "Deb Mangen" <DMangen _ci.edina.mn.us> Subject: FW: Calvin Christian School HRA revenue bond proposal ... Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerotte(o�ci.edina.mn.us From: Steve Timmer r mailto :stimmer @planetlawyers.coml Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 9:07 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Calvin Christian School HRA revenue bond proposal ... Please forward to members of the City Council Ladies and Gentlemen, I want to write to you about the HRA deliberations tonight while the subject is fresh on my mind. You clearly made the right, and I believe only legal, decision. All, or most of you anyway, seemed to readily grasp the pervasive nature of the religious instruction at CCS; it obviated the need for me to ask a question of you, and especially of bond counsel. That is: have you ever been in Calvin Christian School? If you have, then you know that the school makes no effort to segregate religious and secular teaching. It does, in fact, the reverse, and the evidence is everywhere. Everywhere. You could more easily unscramble an egg than segregate religious and secular at CCS. I also have to admit to you that I was hardly impressed by the supercilious bond lawyer —I've already forgotten his name —who showed up for the city. Other than praising you for your insightful questions, he added nothing to the discussion. He obviously knew little or nothing about the nature of the institution being discussed and was only prepared to talk about the law as it applied to CCS in the vaguest of terms. Even there, I am not sure he got it quite straight. The case he referred to— remember now, he's the bond lawyer, not me— involved the issue of state revenue bonds for construction of facilities at private colleges where the instruction is easily segregated from religious worship. And you don't even have to be a Christian to go to most private colleges in Minnesota. The head of the religion department at St. Olaf, where my son attends, is a practicing Hindu. CCS, on the other hand, is a K -8 "Christian" school that only takes students from families where at least one of the parents is a "practicing Christian," as attested to by a Christian clergy member. But learned bond counsel obviously didn't know that. The only thing that a prospective plaintiff in an Establishment Clause case would have to do is take a video tour of CCS. Religious imagery and paraphernalia are omnipresent. Based on the community comment and the interest of the MCLU, I think you could have expected a suit if you had proceeded. If you ever head down this road again, I think at a minimum you need a bond opinion that sets forth an accurate and detailed set of facts upon which the opinion is made, not someone who stands at the podium without notes and tells the council "It's been done before, and gosh, it seems okay here" just before the Council votes on a significant point of constitutional law. I am relieved that you voted as you did. Steve Timmer 5348 Oaklawn Avenue Edina, MN 55424 stimmer @planetlaywers.com AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION 450 NORTH SYNDICATE SUITE 230 SAINT PAUL. MN 55.104 T/651.645.4O97 F/651.647.5948 SUPPORTfdACLU•MN.ORG WWW.ACLU- MN.ORG rsz�?$t,= a�'f3r.+�ar «tom .,c���- •i?�tl" ❑:'. 'Z AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION m' o(`MINNESOTA LL_ February 26, 2008 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota, 55424 VIA FACSIMILE and U.S. MAIL To the Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, It has come to our attention that the Edina HRA is considering issuing 501(c)(3) revenue bonds on behalf of Calvin Christian School in Edina, Minnesota. We are concerned that this financing would violate the establishment of religion clauses of both the Constitution of the United States and the Minnesota Constitution. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution reads, in part, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.." Article I, Section 16 of the Minnesota Constitution reads, in part, "nor shall any control of or interference with the rights.of.conscience be permitted, or any preference be given by to any religious establishment or mode of worship." The constitutional test for whether a 501(c)(3) revenue bond financing (so- called "pass through bonds ") violates the Establishment Clause is a .three prong test: Whether the pass through bond program advances a clear, governmental, secular interest; whether the program's primary effect is to advance or inhibit religion; and whether the program presents the perception of endorsement of religion to the reasonable observer. We believe that the proposed revenue bond financing for Calvin Christian School would fail that test.` Calvin Christian School acknowledges themselves to be a pervasively sectarian . institution. Advertising on their web site states that they "support Christian education that does not divide life into secular and sacred parts." Therefore, it is fair to consider that the proceeds of the bonds will be used for sectarian uses. The issuance of these. bonds will not advance a clear, governmental, secular. interest. This project will not bring in additional tax revenues to the City of Edina. It is unlikely that any construction jobs created will primarily benefit residents of Edina. Finally, because the students of the school come from more than 50 metro -area municipalities, this project does not primarily benefit the education of Edina children.. f The primary effect of this financing is to advance religion. This financing is not part of an overall program to build new libraries for schools in Edina. It will only build the library for Calvin Christian school. Calvin Christian's expansion is designed to serve its mission, "Education fully integrated with a biblical knowledge of God and his world. The school does not carve out the.project which these bonds will finance as purely secular or available for general public use. Therefore, this action by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA ") will advance the sectarian mission of the school. Finally, this program presents the perception that this financing is an endorsement of religion to a reasonable observer. In prior cases on this issue, the revenue bonds have been part of an overall city development plan. In this case,. this is an issue of first impression. The HRA is a distinct governmental body from the.City of Edina. Looking back through its actions to 1994, one can see that the HRA has financed the redevelopment of the Centennial Lakes area; 50th and. France, and the Grandview Area. More recently, it issued revenue, bonds.payable by the City of Edina for new public gymnasiums at the Community Center and Southview Middle School. In December of 2007, the ERA's counsel mistakenly announced that the 'HRA had a policy in place sine.• 995 for doing 501(c)(3) pass through finances, and thus approved a pass through financing`for the Volunteers of America. In fact, it was the City of Edina that had passed such a policy. The Volunteers of America financing was a radical departure from the previous work. of the HRA. However, it at least served to subsidize a charity which offers help in housing. The Calvin Christian project does not bring any new business to Edina, it does not redevelop a.blighied area,.nor does it promote low.income housing. This construction is not part of an overall plan by the HRA to build libraries. for schools or.improve education in Edina. In fact, the HRA rejected a proposal from. the West Metro Education Program for a magnet'school at the Grandview site.. A reasonable observer could easily conclude that this program 'is designed solely to advance the religious purposes of Calvin Christian School. For these reasons, the ACLU -MN urges the HRA to deny Calvin Christian School's request for the issuance of revenue bonds for the renovation of their school building. Sincerely, Teresa Nelson Legal Counsel . To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL ow e Nov � �,o • PORAI�9 • 1888 Agenda Item #: IX. C. From: Ross Bintner P.E., Environmental Manager Action Discussion ❑ Date: March 5, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Energy & Environment Commission (EEC) Advisory Communication — Urban Forests Task Force Action Requested: The EEC respectfully requests that the Urban Forest Task Force work plan item (Exhibit 1) be restored to the 2013 EEC work plan. Information / Background: See attached advisory communication. 0 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 This advisory is in response to City Council having removed the Urban Forest Task Force (UFTF) from the 2013 EEC work plan. Background: EEC formed the UFTF in response to the need to update City ordinances related to trees as well as to meet the requirments of one of the Green Step Cities best practice actions. The UFTF is composed of Dianne Plunkett Latham (Chair /EEC), Joseph 'Hulbert (Park Board), Michael. Schroeder (Planning) and Tom Horwath (Staff). Assessment: Council may not have realized that the UFTF has had at least 8 meetings since it began in 2010 and that it has ,a preliminary draft report, which the UFTF would like to finish up with a few,more meetings,and; present to Council at EEC's June Work Session with Council Recommendation: EEC respectfully requests that the Urban Forest Task Force work plan item (Exhibit 1) be restored to the 2013 EEC work plan. Routine From To Action Requested EEC City Council Include as correspondence to Council. hEnergy and Environment Commission \Projects \2013 \Urban Forest Advisory\130305 EEC Urban Forest Advisory.doc Exhibit 1 2013 New Initiative Target Budget ... Completion Required Required Approval a Date Urban Forestry Policy December 2013 Staff time in Moderate: Review and Tree Planting 2013, with Parks Director, Project potential budget City Forester, City Review current tree planting- recommendations Planner. policies and existing efforts in for future planting, removal, and operations. development requirements. This item is a continuation of work of the Urban Forest Task Force. R MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FEBRUARY 23, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Grabiel called the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission to order at 7:00 PM. II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Commissioners Scherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Kilberg, Potts, Platteter, Cherkassky, Fischer, Staunton, Grabiel Members absent: Carpenter III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Meeting Agenda was approved as submitted. IV. ANNULA MEETING — ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND ADOPTION OF BYLAWS Chair Grabiel addressed the Commission and informed them it is time to elect new officers. Chair Grabiel opened nominations for Chair. Commissioner Platteter moved to nominate Commissioner Staunton to serve as Chair. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. No further nominations for Chair were moved. Commissioner Scherer moved to close the nominations for Chair. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; Chair nominations closed. Kevin Staunton was elected Chair of the Edina Planning Commission Kevin Staunton took the Chair and asked for nominations for Vice - Chair. Commissioner Potts moved to nominate Commissioner Platteter as Vice - Chair. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. No further nominations for Vice - Chair were moved. Nominations were closed. Chair Staunton welcomed Commissioner Platteter as Vice- Chair. Chair Staunton asked for nominations for Secretary. Commissioner Platteter moved to nominate Ken Potts for Secretary. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. No further nominations for Secretary were moved; being none Commissioner Potts was elected Edina Planning Commission Secretary. V. APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEMS Commissioner Platteter moved approval of the January 23, 2013, meeting minutes. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest pointed out on page 4 Commissioner Potts needed to be changed to Commissioner Platteter. All voted aye; motion carried. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT No comment. VII. PUBLIC HEARING A. Lot Division. Maimares. 5809 and 5813 Tingdale Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Thomas J. Maimares is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides the two properties at 5809 and 5813 Tingdale Avenue. The purpose of the request is to slightly shift the side lot line between these two properties so that the each lot would have more area in the between the home and the side property line, and to eliminate the driveway encroachment at the front lot line. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5809 and 5813 Tingdale Avenue. Approval is based on the findings: 1. The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The purpose of the lot line adjustment is to provide additional side yard setback for each home and eliminate the driveway encroachment. 3. The resulting lot area, lot width and lot depth would not change. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend lot division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. F) B. Variance — Kolles. 7380 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Marketplace Home Mortgage, 7380 France Avenue is requesting a variance to allow a 36 square foot wall sign on the south elevation of the building that does not face a street. Sign ordinance No. 460.05 Subd. 5, allows properties zoned Planned Office District to display one wall sign and one monument sign on street facing facades only. Teague explained that the applicant recently purchased the subject office building which formerly housed multiple tenants, and is undertaking a considerable renovation project. Included in the renovation work is an improved sign plan. The applicant is in agreement with the size criteria set out for signs in the Planned Office District, however believes that the restriction of only allowing the signs to face a street frontage impedes the ability to identify his building to the same extent that surrounding properties are allowed. Since the subject building's only street frontage is on France Avenue to the east, the property owner may display a wall sign and a monument sign, 50 square feet and 36 square feet in area, totaling 86 square feet in area abutting France Avenue. The subject request entails installation of a 50 square foot wall sign on the France Avenue elevation which is allowed; and removing the existing monument sign on France, to be replaced by a 36 square foot wall sign on the south elevation of the building, lacking street frontage, thus subject to the variance request. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variance based on the following findings: a) The practical difficult is being only one of the three office zoned properties of 14 on the east side of France Avenue from the Crosstown Highway south to Minnesota Drive lacking side street frontage, thus unable to sign the north or south face of the building. b) The City has approved a relatively similar sign to be built at the Fidelity building at 7700 France. Fidelity was approved for a wall sign to face a non - street frontage area as part of the final development plan process. Said north elevation abuts an interior lot line, not street frontage. c) The request is reasonable in that the applicant is removing the allowed free standing sign on the site. Therefore, overall square footage of signage allowed in this zoning district (86 square feet) is what is being requested. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The wall sign on the south elevation is limited to 36 square feet in area; and is subject to review and approval of a Sign Permit by the Planning Division. 2. Only one sign is allowed on the east elevation not to exceed 50 square feet in area. For a total signage allowed for the building of 86 square feet in area. Appearing for the Applicant Gregory Kolles Discussion A brief discussion ensued on the reason the sign was located on the south side of the building and removal of the monument sign as a condition of approval. Mr. Kolles explained that the reason the sign was placed on the south side was due, to sight lines. He added the sight lines are better traveling north because of the change in topography. Motion Commissioner Scherer moved variance approval based on staff findings 1. a, b, & c and the additional finding that the existing monument sign must be removed, prior to installment of the new sign. Approval is also subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Forrest commented that in her opinion finding 1.b. isn't a finding adding in her opinion previous variances granted shouldn't have a bearing on this variance. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Chair Staunton asked Commissioner Forrest if she would like her comment added as a condition of approval. Forrest agreed. Chair Staunton asked Commissioners Scherer and Grabiel if they would accept Commissioner Forrest's comment as a condition of approval; both agreed. All voted aye; motion carried. C. Variance. Seward. 6937 Cornelia Drive, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Board the subject property is an interior lot located east of Cornelia Drive consisting of a rambler with an attached two car garage. The addition will be a one story addition to the main floor with basement below. The plan is to maintain the existing rambler by adding living space behind the existing home. The property is subjected to a minimum 5 foot setback for an attached garage and a 10 foot setback for living space. The existing garage on the south side of the home is located 7.9 feet from the south lot line. The existing living space on E P the north side of the home is 6.8 feet from the north lot line or 3.2 feet cloer than the 10 foot setback allowed. The ordinance allows 200 square feet,of additional encroachment per built floor at an existing nonconforming setback. Unfortunately the garage side conforms to the 5 foot minimum side yard setback at 7.9 feet from the side lot line but not the 10 foot side yard setback for living space. The owners assumed that the side wall of the garage could be extended into the rear yard for a living space addition, however, the addition for living space needs to be 10 feet from the side lot line. The side wall of the garage is also at an angle to the south lot line, so extending it farther into the rear yard brings the wall closer to the lot line as the wall is extended into the back yard. The property is 9,839 square feet in area with the home and proposed additions occupying 25% of the lot area. The required setback from the side lot line limits the building area of the lot given the existing setback provided by the original home built in 1955. Staff believes it is reasonable to extend the living space behind the garage similar to the setback provided by the north wall of the home. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is consistent with existing conditions and matches the nonconforming setback of the north side of the home. 3) The imposed setbacks severely limit design opportunity. The intent of the ordinance is to provide adequate spacing from the side lot line. The addition will provide a similar setback that exists throughout the neighborhood. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions: Survey date stamped: January 28, 2013 and building plans and elevations date stamped: January 29, 2013. Appearing for the Applicant James Seward Applicant Presentation Chair Staunton acknowledged letters of support from neighbors, within 200 -feet. Mr. Seward addressed the Commission and informed them he has lived in his home for seven years; loves the neighborhood, and needs additional space for their family to grow. Seward said their intent is for a modest addition (supported by neighbors) in keeping with the character of the rambler style home, noting the proposed addition is one story. Continuing Seward said one issue that was very important for them was to protect the large tree in the rear yard, adding that tree is a central character to the rear yard. Concluding, Seward said the front street fagade will not change, reiterating their intent was to maintain the character of the rambler style home. Chair Staunton asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak to this issue; being none, Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel acknowledged letters of support from the neighbors and added in his opinion the applicant is maintaining the character of the existing home and making every effort to save the large tree in the rear yard. Grabiel concluded that he supports the variance request as submitted, adding it's a prime example of a good remodel. Commissioner Platteter thanked the applicant for "looking out for the tree ". Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. D. Variance. Einhorn. 6717 Rosemary Lane, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property, is a corner lot located in the north east corner of Rosemary Lane and Valley View Road. The existing home on the property was built inl967 and consists of a one story rambler with an attached two car garage. The property is subjected to two front yard setbacks, along Rosemary Lane C and Valley View Road. The homeowners would like to add a small mudroom north of their existing garage and add a third garage stall south of the existing garage. The front yard setback required from Rosemary Lane is approximately 51' feet with the subject home providing a 30 foot setback. The setback required from Valley View Road is 39.7 feet with the subject home providing a setback from Valley View of 36.2 feet. The existing home is nonconforming regarding setbacks from both streets and while not in the area of proposed construction, the existing rear yard setback of 13.3 feet is also nonconforming regarding the required 25 foot rear yard setback. The subject lot was subdivided off from the lot to the north in 1966, and received a depth variance to allow a lot depth of 110 feet instead of 120 feet and to allow the home to front Rosemary Lane with the side street along Valley View Road. Front yard setback variances were not required to locate the house at the time it was built, so it is presumed that the nonconforming setbacks from both streets must have complied with the ordinances at the time. The home is currently nonconforming along both street frontages and from the rear lot line. Based on buildable area, there is very little opportunity for expansion with the exception of perhaps adding a second floor. The homeowner desires to maintain the structure as a rambler and not alter the character of the neighborhood. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings: 1. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it will allow slight modifications to an existing nonconforming structure and will have little if any impact on surrounding properties. 2. The practical difficulties in complying with the ordinances are the existing nonconforming setbacks of the current home and original orientation of the home on the lot with a nonconforming lot depth. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions survey date stamped: December 27, 2012 and building plans and elevations date stamped: December 19, 2012. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. and Mrs. Einhorn, property owners and applicants. Applicant Presentation Mrs. Einhorn addressed the Commission and explained they have four boys and love 7 their community; however they need additional space for storage and the parking of future vehicles. Concluding, Einhorn asked the Commission for their support. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel stated he had no issue with the proposed mudroom; however, has an issue with the third garage stall. Chair Staunton asked Commissioner Grabiel if he would feel differently if the proposed third garage stall was proposed as living space; not garage. Commissioner Grabiel responded he was unsure how he would feel about that. Grabiel noted the applicant currently meets the City's 2 -stall garage minimum. Chair Staunton asked Planner Aaker if the proposed additions create lot coverage issues. Planner Aaker responded lot coverage is not an issue. Commissioner Platteter asked the applicant if they are planning to add additional landscaping to soften garage impact. Mrs. Einhorn explained that currently there is a fence and two large trees in that area, adding they also could do additional plantings in that area. Commissioner Scherer said this is an unusual situation with very few opportunities for expansion, adding that personally she favors three stall garages; it gets equipment and vehicles off driveways and yards. Concluding, Scherer said she supports the request as submitted. Commissioner Potts asked Mrs. Einhorn if any steps would be taken to save the trees. Mrs. Einhorn responded that she contacted an arborist who will work with them to implement measures to protect both trees. Motion Commissioner Scherer moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Potts, Platteter, and Staunton. Nay; Grabiel. Motion carried. E. Subdivision. Kiser. 5633 Tracy Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser is proposing to subdivide the property at 5633 Tracy Avenue into two lots. To accommodate the request the following is required: 8 1. A subdivision; and 2. Lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. Teague explained that both lots would gain access off Tracy Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 12,090 square feet, median lot depth is 136 feet, and the median lot width is 85 feet. The new lots would meet the median area and depth, but would be just short of the median width. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property in the same manner as the adjacent property to the east. Teague noted the condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to the Tracy Avenue area. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5633 Tracy Avenue and the lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot area and depth, and nearly meet the median width. 3. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block of Tracy Avenue. 4. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: 0 a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Tracy Avenue. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to- curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Appearing for the Applicant Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser and Miriam Kiser, property owner. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify how lot sizes are determined; by the average or median. Planner Teague responded it's the median. Commissioner Scherer commented that if she read the plans correctly the requested subdivision would mirror exactly the lots to its east. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Applicant Presentation Mr. Helm addressed the Commission and introduced property owner and longtime Edina resident Miriam Kiser. . Mr. Helm noted that within the 500 -foot neighborhood there are 77 data sets. 22 of the lots range between 80 — 81 feet in width and eleven are at 80 feet. Mr. Helm pointed out while lot width variances are required for each lot the lots will exceed the minimum lot width requirement of 75 -feet. Mr. Helm informed Commissioners that Tracy is a State road and the State indicated they have no issues with the subdivision as proposed. Helm also noted both lots are stubbed for water. Concluding, Mr. Helm asked the Commission for their support. Mrs. Kiser echoed that statement. Chair Staunton asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak to this issues; being none Commissioner Scherer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 10 Discussion Commissioner Forrest said she doesn't agree with staff that one of the practical difficulties is the oversized lot. She added in her opinion practical difficulties exist because the median lot width gets skewed by the adjoining properties; however she pointed out lot area and depth exceed the median. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved to recommend preliminary plat approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VIII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Zoning Ordinance Update — Residential Development — Ken Potts, Arlene Forrest and Mike Platteter Commissioner Platteter introduced Commissioners Potts and Forrest reporting the three (at the request of the Commission) volunteered late October early November to create a small "working group /subcommittee" to tackle the issues of residential redevelopment as it relates to Code issues and construction management. Platteter said their final goal would be to provide suggestions /recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. Commissioners Platteter, Forrest and Potts gave a brief overview and with the aid of graphics indicated where "we" were and where "we" are going. The following points were highlighted: • Held two public information gathering forums and evaluated input results. • Presented to the Commission current zoning comparisons between Cities; noting that Edina "fell into" the more restrictive category. • As mentioned at the last Planning Commission meeting the themes of "concern" appear to fall into two categories; new /remodel, home size and lot modification impacts; and new /remodel home construction project impacts; both fielded the following comments /concerns: 1. Majority of concerns appeared to be with lots smaller than 75 -feet in width 2. Concern expressed over the mass /height and setbacks of the new /remodeled properties. 3. Grading and drainage appeared to be a real issue for many. 4. Tree and landscaping loss and tree /landscape maintenance after construction. 5. Access to rear yard. Maintain it. 11 6. Site debris /trash removal. Enforce newly enacted Construction Maintenance Plan. 7. Work hours /noise. Enforce Construction Maintenance Plan. 8. Parking /traffic. Enforce Construction Maintenance Plan. 9. Material staging. Enforce Construction Maintenance Plan. The subcommittee stressed the issues are very complicated and there probably is no single solution. Difficulty was noted when balancing individual property rights with community rights and if changes are made the City doesn't want to create more issues than are solved. The following "solutions" evolved from the public input forums and past meetings of the "subcommittee ": • Should there be design review for a neighborhood "fit ". Commissioner Forrest commented that would be a difficult and complex issue, adding who would review the designs of all new houses. Platteter agreed and .commented that it would be difficult to establish guidelines because Edina has such a wide range of housing styles. • Establish new zoning or overlay districts with varying requirements (setbacks, height) by lot size. Commissioner Potts noted that the current zoning ordinance requirements were mostly written for lots at or over 75 -feet in width. Potts noted much of Edina (especially on the east side) lot widths are less than 75 -feet. • Establish new lot size requirements (setbacks, lot coverage) for the smaller lots. • How does one maintain current lot size standards but allow subdivisions that create nonconforming lots in areas of nonconforming lots. • Floor Area Ratio could be used as a tool to limit building mass. • Garage size and placement of the garage. Reduce the percent of "garage door ". • Impermeable area — how to calculate lot coverage. What should-be included, excluded. • Increase accessory use setbacks (outbuildings, sheds). Three feet is too close is some areas. • Prohibit egress windows in side yards — suggest staggering setbacks; 5 -feet on one side, 10 -feet on the other. • Reconsider the way building height is measured. • Consider allowing in the "small lot" neighborhoods single stall garages; not two as currently required. This would avoid overbuilding and the large front loading garages found in the smaller lot neighborhoods. Platteter indicated that this evening no formal action would be taken; however, they would like feedback from the Commission on some of the ideas they outlined before the joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council on March 5th. Platteter said at that time the "subcommittee" would present their findings to the Planning Commission and Council. The subcommittee concluded their presentation. Chair Staunton thanked the three for all their work and thanked them for reaching out not only to the residents of Edina but the business and building community as well. Staunton said the subcommittee opened up a great dialogue. 12 Discussion Commissioner Grabiel noted the mention of design review. Commissioner Forrest said design review has been brought up a number of times and pointed out a form of design review is occurring in the Country Club District with strict guidelines; however; Forrest said the difficulty they identified was who would be the design "reviewer(s) ", adding that would be a very difficult element to establish. Platteter and Potts agreed with Forrest pointing out if one only focuses on Morningside that neighborhood is very eclectic and it would be difficult to develop guidelines in that neighborhood and in Edina at large because it's a completely developed City. Design review can work in a new City, or new subdivision; however, there is difficulty in establishing a design review committee or review group committee in a community that's completely developed, developed during different times and with differing lot sizes.. The question becomes "what would the guidelines be "? Chair Staunton agreed and added it may be possible to establish a "general" set of standards that would encompass the entire City - such as roof pitch, garage size, etc. Commissioner Grabiel asked what the reaction was from the builders /developers at their meeting. Platteter said that the builders expressed frustration with the current way the Ordinance determines building height by stepping back the building for each foot the building height exceeds 15 -feet. Platteter said that this current formula (at least from the builder's perspective) prohibits the construction of specific housing styles. Commissioner Potts said the builders welcomed the Construction Maintenance Plan. Commissioner Scherer commented that she was intrigued with the findings presented by the subcommittee especially the "hot buttons ". She said with the Construction Maintenance Management plan it appears that staff would need to be even more involved with a project than at present. With regard to mass and lot coverage she said the City may need to reconsider what's included and excluded in lot coverage. Scherer also agreed that the "outbuilding" question of size and setback may also need to be revisited. Continuing, Scherer stated she understands the aesthetic ramifications of front loading garages and that their appearance may be "too much" for some people; however, there are many Edina residents that don't want to look at excess "stuff' and excess vehicles on driveways and believe a two and even three stall garage isn't enough. She concluded she may have difficulty supporting the one stall garage option. Commissioner Platter responded that suggestion would only be for lots 50 -feet or less. Commissioner Grabiel said with regard to front loading garages that he was impressed with the suggestion of limiting the front loading garage to a percentage of the total fagade. A discussion ensued acknowledging the difficulties of a uniform code that applies City wide. It was also observed that the large amount of teardowns in specific 13 neighborhoods is a big stressor. It was also noted that banks may be more receptive to a teardown /rebuilt because of the uncertainty of the condition of the house, adding remodeling could be even more expensive and /or timely depending on what they find. Chair Staunton said this dialogue would continue to March 5th with a joint meeting between the Planning Commission and City Council. Staunton said the Commission needs to think about how this is approached. Commissioner Grabiel said one goal of the Construction Maintenance Management Plan would be to try to avoid situations where the City ends up in Court. Grabiel wondered if the City should develop a hearing or mitigation process if a complaint can't be resolved. Commissioner Platteter agreed, adding the subcommittee discussed creating a fine system for violators. Planner Teague informed the Commission City Attorney Roger Knutson would be present at the joint meeting. Teague noted there's a lot to consider. It was further suggested that if Commissioners have other ideas for the Construction Maintenance Management Plan to share their ideas, with the subcommittee or City Staff prior to March 5th Commissioner Platteter reported that at this time the City of Minneapolis is conducting a small'area plan for the Linden Hills neighborhood, adding that maybe the City could find out from Minneapolis more about that process. Planner Teague said he will find out if Minneapolis plans on any outreach with Edina. Chair Staunton thanked the subcommittee for their work on this issue and reminded Commission of the joint Council and Planning Commission meeting on the 5th IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. X. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Staunton mentioned that last evening the City Council hosted a ULI workshop that was very informative. He added there will be future workshops available for Commissioners to attend and Staff will let up know when those opportunities arise. Chair Staunton reported that the City has received formal application from Byerly's on their redevelopment proposal and the Commission will hear their request at the next meeting. XI. STAFF COMMENTS None. 14 XII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Grabiel moved for adjournment at 9:20 PM. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. l/Q6to Tl00,l IrQ�G/G�/� Respectfully submitted 15 N MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday December 13, 2012 7:04 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:04p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Gubrud, Heer, Kostuch, Latham, Risser, Sokol, Thompson, Zarrin, and Chair Sierks Late Arrival: Rudnicki Absent:'Brandt Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Zarrin to approve the Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes. Revise November Meeting Minutes and approve in January. B. Attendance report and roster C. Workgroup list and minutes. Add Chad Bell as a Prospective Member and move John Dolphin as a Member in the Energy Working Group. Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Latham to approve the Attendance Report and Roster and Work Group List and Minutes as amended. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No Comments. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. January meeting planning. The January meeting will be the annual televised EEC monthly meeting. Member Latham will create the seating chart. i. Subcommittee reports (Subcommittee chairs). Each Work Group will present 1 -3 highlights from the past year and future goals within five minutes. Chairs will email their topics and any PowerPoint's to Mr. Bintner. Project Earth update from the Edina High School. ii. Allied Single Sort. This topic will be discussed within the Recycling and Solid Waste Work Group Report. Explanation of what new commodities are being collected will be the main focus. iii. McKinstry GESP /Solar. A speaker is still.being requested for a 15 minute presentation. iv. B3 System. Mr. Bintner will do a 20 minute presentation on the B3 System. v. ULI Regional Indicators - Richard Carter has been confirmed for a 20 minute presentation. vi. Green Step Cities - Philipp Muessig has been confirmed for a 20 minute presentation. The Working Groups and Guest Speakers shall present in the following order: 1. Recycling and Solid Waste 2. Air and Water Quality 3. Purchasing 4. Education and Outreach S. Student Update 6. Energy 7. McKinstry GESP /Solar 8. B3 System 9. ULI Regional Indicators 10. Green Step Cities B. Capital Improvement Program 2013 -2017 Draft. Mr. Bintner reviewed the projects that had some clean water or energy relation to land or a building. EEC would like to see more Environmental Projects in the CIP. Member Kostuch would like to see the green procurement policy committee activated. Mr. Bintner will ask the City Manager who the procurement policy members are and the status of the committee. EEC Members would like to have the procurement policy reviewed with all of the CIP Projects. All RFP projects should include sustainability as well. The procurement policy was a part of the Green Step Cities process and needs to be implemented within City projects. EEC Members would like the Council to ask how the procurement policy was implemented within a project before it gets approved. Member Rudnicki arrives at 8:02pm. C. Air and Water Quality WG. The meeting was cancelled due to the Thanksgiving Holiday. D. Education Outreach WG. Proposing a Climate presentation on April 18th with Paul Douglas or Mark Sealy as a guest speaker. Member Sokol reported that Project Earth received a Green Partners Grant to install hand dryers in the high school bathrooms to remove paper towel waste. i. Solar Workshop Report. Member Thompson said 75 people attended the Solar Workshop Event. He thanked Mr. Bintner and the Communications Dept. for all of their help with planning and televising the event. The Work Group would like to have a Solar event annually. The Members were disappointed with the Sun Current's not having advertised the event. E. Energy WG. The Work Group passed a resolution recommending expanding EEEP to include Single Family projects. EEC Members expressed concerns as to whether the City had sufficient staff capacity, whether there were any legal concerns given the FHWA position on residential PACE, and whether the City had any concerns about its debt rating. L Wind and Solar Ordinance. Member Sierks said the city doesn't have a model ordinance. A variance or conditional use permit would be needed if something violates a location or height issue. The work group will follow up with what the City of Orono is doing with wind turbines on residential property. ii. EEEP Program Changes. Mr. Bintner gave an update on administrative edits that he did to the EEEP Program. He discussed a proposal about sustainability to the Commercial Energy PACE Tool and have a reward and recognition by the city on completion of the energy project. F. Recycling & Solid Waste WG i. Ordinance Amendment. Member Latham was directed to revise the proposed code with the items the EEC Members recommended. Due to lack of anticipated time at the January meeting, the proposed changes will be scheduled on the February agenda. Member Zarrin gave an update on Commercial Recycling education for business owners through a Task Force. Edina has been invited to be a Pilot project for Hennepin County Environmental Services' new commercial recycling education program. The Edina Chamber of Commerce has expressed a willingness to participate. The Commission thanked member Zarrin for her initiative in getting Edina into the Hennepin County pilot project. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Zarrin contingent on the city approving staff to be on the Task Force: we recommend the following Business Recycling Education Task Force, Member Zarrin as Chair, Bill Neuendorf as staff member, or other appropriate staff member, and invite the Chamber of Commerce, Hennepin County Environmental Services, Edina Business Representation (50th & France, etc.), and Education and Recycling Solid Waste Working Group Members as maybe interested. Motion carried unanimously. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS. No Comments. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS. No Comments. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Green Step Cities Review. This topic was tabled. B. Wellhead Protection Plan P2. Mr. Bintner said the Public Hearing will occur on December 181h Member Latham gave an update on items that occurred at the December Park Board meeting. The first is a proposal of a Mountain Bike Course around the Braemar Golf Course named The Ridges at Braemar, which was tabeled at the December Park Board meeting. The second is setting up a Task Force for Community Gardens with one being proposed at Yorktown Park. The final is a children's Edible Garden, which is being planned at Lewis Park. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 9:16p.m. Motion made by Member Heer and seconded by Member Gubrud to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Resp ttully submitted, cca Foster GIS Administrator MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday January 10, 2013 7:01 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:01p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Brandt, Heer, Kostuch, Latham, Risser, Sokol, Thompson, Zarrin, and Chair Sierks Absent: Gubrud, Rudnicki Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A.. Minutes. Revise December Meeting Minutes and approve in February. B. Attendance report and roster C. Workgroup list and minutes Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Risser to approve the Minutes for November and Consent Agenda and amend the December Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No Comments. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Air and Water Quality WG. Member Risser explained the merger of the Air Quality and the Water Quality Working Groups was due to the Chair of the Water Quality stepping down and that both environments influence each other. In 2012, No Idle signs were installed at Concord Elementary & Creek Valley Elementary Schools encouraging residents not to idle their engines while they pick up and drop off children. The Working Group reviewed the Wellhead Protection Plan for the city. In 2013, the Working Group would like to encourage residents in getting the local lake names officially recognized by the DNR for their documents to be better understood. The Storm Water Pollution Plan will be reviewed this year too. B. Recycling & Solid Waste WG. Member Latham thanked all Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group Members for their participation and invited new members to call city hall if they want to join. In October 2012, Single Sort Recycling was approved by the City Council, so Member Latham reviewed what is and isn't acceptable to recycle now. She reviewed the 2012 comparison of single verses duel sort and how paper, glass and the new commodities has increased recycling by 8% during the 4th quarter 2012 compared to 4th quarter 2011. She said if residents would like to recycle organics they can contact Vierkant Disposal Inc. She reminded residents that the wheeled carts must be stored out of view of the front yard per city code. She said you can contact the city if you'd like to upgrade or down grade your recycling cart size. She reminded residents that your green bins will not be picked up if you're using them for overflow. She suggested possibly working with a neighbor who recycles less to take your overflow. In 2012, 25 Recycling Bins were installed at City Parks; additional 25 bins will be installed yearly until a total of 100 bins have been installed. "No Pet Waste" Stickers will be placed on the Park Recycling Bins to stop contamination of the recyclables. If a bag of pet waste is put in a recycling bin, the entire contents of the bin will be put in the trash and not recycled. Organic Recycling has been implemented at City Hall & Edinborough and will be soon be added to the other city facilities. Edina is the only city to ask for a Trash Collection report by weight and the RSW working group will review the findings this year. In 2013, Member Zarrin will be starting a Business Recycling Education Task Force. Members of the task force will include EEC Members, City Staff, Hennepin County Environmental Services, Edina Chamber of Commerce and local business owners. Edina will be a pilot city for Hennepin County for promoting, educating and reviewing commercial recycling. C. Education Outreach WG. Member Thompson reviewed the mission of the working group. In April 2012, there was a Dialogue on The Environment, Economy & Food Supply from Global to Local with Dr. Jonathan Foley. In November, Solar Works in Edina was an event where one business and two residents shared their solar installation experiences. Edina Interfaith Environmental Coalition was created to educate energy efficiency and environmental stewardship among the faith communities. In 2013, EEC Film Series will start in March with the Carbon Nation Film. Second Annual April Earth, Day Celebration with the topic What's Up with the Weather? Member Thompson invited residents to contact him if they'd like to join the working group. D. Student Initiatives. Member Sokol reported that Project Earth received a Green Partners Grant to install hand dryers in the high school bathrooms to remove paper towel waste. Member Brandt reported that Project Earth installed compost centers in the high school lunchroom and installed water bottle fillers to encourage students to use refillable bottles instead of plastic water bottles. E. Purchasing Task Force. Member Kostuch said the first green purchasing policy task force annual report will be due this year. F. Energy WG. Member Heer gave an overview of EEEP. In 2012, he reported that Edina won an award for PACE from the Environmental Initiative Group. Edina achieved Step 3 for Green Step Cities. The working group gave a recommendation for a more energy efficient Golf Dome. In 2013, Member Heer plans to promote EEEP, Building Energy Efficiency Audits, and continue work on the Green Step Cities program. Member Heer also thanked Mr. Bintner for all of his hard work with the EEC. G. Presentations i. McKinstry GESP /Solar (Trish Curtis & Brent Schmidt). Ms. Curtis gave a Project Overview which included Building Envelope Improvements (weatherization upgrades), Solar (solar panels installed at City Hall), Water Conservation (reducing flow of water on showers), and Interior Lighting (for better energy efficiency) within all City facilities. The project cost was $701,093 with utility savings of $54,021 and it included incentives of $284,750 with the project payback occurring within 7.7years. ii. B3 System. Mr. Bintner presented the 3yrs of data on City Facilities using the Building Energy Use Benchmark System. He discussed what the current building energy use is, opportunities exist for energy savings, how previous energy efficiency improvements performed and if the city is meeting their environmental goals. ei iii. ULI Regional Indicators. Rick Carter, consultant at LHB Inc gave the Regional Indicators Report which compared Edina and 20 other cities within MN over a four year period. The report contains Edina's total city use of Energy, Water, Travel, Waste and Greenhouse Gas Emissions among Residential and Commercial /Industrial properties. The goal is to promote efficiency and sustainable change at the scale of the city through multiple tasks. iv. Green Step Cities. Chair Sierks said there are 50 cities participating in Green Step Cities which is a free, voluntary, continuous challenge, assistance and recognition framework for taking more sustainable actions. Edina was a pilot city and now has completed Step 3 along with three other cities. There are 28 best practices with 4 -8 optional actions under each best practice. Edina has completed 37 actions under 16 best practices. The program is currently developing Steps 4 -6. Member Latham thanked Chair Sierks for being instrumental in Edina joining the program. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS. No Comments. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. 2013 EEC Workplan. Mr. Bintner reviewed the 2013 EEC Work Plan that was approved by Council. The work plan is Comprehensive City Building Energy Efficiency Project, Energy Efficiency Community Outreach and Education Project, Promote Edina Emerald Energy Program with exploring applications to residential property, Integrate Comprehensive Plan Chapter 10 Into City Operations, Surface Water Quality Policy Exploration, and Update Recycling Licensing Ordinance with language or program related to commercial recycling. Chair Sierks.would like to work with City staff to explore what risks might be involved with expanding PACE to residential properties and possibly have it promoted by the EEC April Forum. Member Zarrin introduced her plan for a Business Recycling Education Task Force that will meet once a month every third Wednesday at 3:30pm at the Chamber of Commerce. Member Latham asked Mr. Bintner why the Urban Forest Task Force was removed as a Work Plan item, since it was on the 2012 Work Plan and that there isn't much staff time involved. Mr. Bintner said it was due to other priorities. Chair Sierks would like to discuss what the work plan priorities are at the February EEC meeting and decide if the EEC Working Groups are structured appropriately to accomplish the work plan and decide at that time if EEC should recommend that the Urban Forest Task Force proceed forward. Chair Sierks asked Mr. Bintner to schedule a Work Session with Council. Member Latham proposed that during the work session they can discuss the urban forest task force. IX. STAFF COMMENTS. No Comments. Member Latham said a Community Gardening Task Force was formed at the Park Board meeting. A Community Garden is being proposed in Yorktown Park next to the YMCA. Member Latham said she volunteered to help write standards to manage the Gardens. Member Thompson also volunteered to be on the task force. Member Thompson said he is on the Morningside Neighborhood Association Steering Committee to plan a Community Garden in Morningside on private property. Motion made by Member Risser and seconded by Member Zarrin to approve Commissioner Latham and Commissioner Thompson as members on the Community Gardening Task Force. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 8:45p.m. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Reb cca. Foster GIS Administrator a MINUTES Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, January 8, 2013 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Carr, and Members, Davis, Moore, Christiaansen, Stegner, Sussman, and Good. Absent were Members Curran, Anger, Mellom, and Johnson. Staff present was Planner Joyce Repya. 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Stegner moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES December 11, 2012 Member Davis moved approval of the minutes from the December 11, 2012 meeting. Member Christiaansen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None VI. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. H -13 -1 4627 Casco Avenue - Build a detached garage in the northeast corner of the rear yard & replace attached garage with living space Planner Repya reported that the subject property is located on the east side of the 4600 block of Casco Avenue. The existing home, an American Georgian Revival with Federal Revival influence, was constructed in 1936 and currently has a single story 2 -car attached garage accessed by a driveway on the north side of the property. The Certificate of Appropriateness request entails the construction of a new detached garage in the northeast corner of the rear yard. The plans also include converting the single story attached garage to living space at the rear of the home. The proposed 504 square foot 2 -car detached garage measures 24' x 21' feet in area. A service door and window are provided on the south elevation. Access to the garage will be obtained on the west elevation from the existing driveway. The design of the structure is proposed to compliment the style of the home utilizing bricks taken from the existing attached garage on the west (front) elevation and Hardi -board lap siding on the north, south, and east elevations. The height of the garage is shown to be 17' 8" at the highest peak. The height at the mid -point of the gable is shown to be 14' 3 "', and a height of 8'9" is provided at the eave line. The hip roof Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes January 8, 2013 is designed with an 8/12 pitch, complimenting the hip roof of the home. All dimensions for the proposed structure are consistent with the surrounding detached garages and new garages previously approved by the HPB through the Certificate of Appropriateness process. The proposed location of the garage is 4'4" from the north and east property lines. The north and east elevations abut 6 foot privacy fences, thus no windows or architectural detailing has been provided for those sides, which is consistent with other garages plans approved in the district. Ms. Repya pointed out that plans for the conversion of the attached garage to living space at the rear of the home were provided for the Board's information. The new space was designed to provide a compatible use of the home while at the same time maintain the home's overall historic character. The attached garage space will be reduced by approximately 190 square feet to ensure that the total footprint of the structures on the lot does not exceed the 30% maximum allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. (The existing lot coverage is 24.1%, and the proposed lot coverage will be 29.7 %). A second story enclosed porch over the existing attached garage is proposed to be removed — replaced with a flat- roofed deck enclosed with a wrought iron railing. Also, the existing brick on the attached garage will be used to clad the west elevation of the garage that is somewhat visible from the front street as one looks up the driveway; thus the one story conversion to living space is proposed to be clad with Hardi -board lap siding to match the north, east and south walls of the new detached garage. Ms. Repya added that Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel had reviewed the proposal and observed that construction of new detached garage is appropriate in the Country Club District. .In his evaluation, Mr. Vogel pointed out that the project as proposed would satisfy the requirements of the district plan of treatment by matching the character of the historic house and by being compatible with it in size, scale, massing, and material; it would also be compatible with the character of the neighborhood as a whole. The plans also show a traditional garage that will be architecturally subordinate to the house and provide for visual screening from adjacent properties. Mr. Vogel concluded his critique by recommending approval of the COA application. Planner Repya'concluded that she agreed with Consultant Vogel's evaluation of the proposed improvements to the property, noting that the detached garage is consistent with new garages previously reviewed in the district and conversion of the attached garage to living space will blend in well with the historic fagade of the home. She too recommended approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request subject the plans presented and a year built plaque be affixed to the exterior of the new detached garage. Ms. Repya added that the following findings support the approval recommendation: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the proposed projects. • The proposed detached garage and conversion of the attached garage to living space will complement the architectural style of the home and not be detrimental to the adjacent 2 � t Edina - Heritage - Preservation - Board - - - -- - - -- - - Minutes - - - - January 8, 2013 historic structures. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Property owner, Brad Frankenstein was in attendance and responded to questions from the Board to clarify their understanding of the project. Member Christiaansen asked if the color for the lap siding had been determined. Mr. Frankenstein explained that he and his wife are currently in the exploration mode — driving around the neighborhood to get ideas. He pointed out that it is important that the project not only compliment his home, but the neighboring properties as well. He added that they will be looking for subtle colors to contrast with the brick. Following a brief discussion with board members stating that the proposal under consideration was a good project, Member Moore moved to approve the COA application subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque attached to the exterior of the new detached garage. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Review of completed COA projects Planner Repya provided the Board with a PowerPoint presentation showing before and after photographs for eight Country Club District Certificate of Appropriate projects which had been completed in the past year. Ms. Repya pointed out that up until now the HPB had not been provided the opportunity to "view the fruits of their labors ". She added that it is important to remember that once a COA is approved, there is follow- through to ensure that what was approved is built. Board members agreed that they enjoyed seeing the finished projects, which often look very different than when reviewed in the plan form on paper. Ms. Repya suggested that the "COA's in Review" be an annual year -end report for the HPB. The Board agreed that would be most helpful. VII. OLD BUSINESS Chair Carr explained that she is initiating a new format for the "old business" portion of the agenda to include the work plan status as well as the activities of the standing and ad hoc /working committees. While there may be nothing to report from a respective group, the intention is to ensure that work items are not forgotten. The board agreed that would be a good idea. Edina Heritage Preservation Board - - I - - - Minutes— - - - - -- - -- January 8, 2013 A. Report on Status of HPB 2013 Work Plan Chair Carr reported that the City Council approved the proposed 2013 Work Plan for the HPB. Board members briefly reviewed the document. Planner Repya suggested that the work plan remain in their meeting packets for easy reference. B. Report on Status of Consultant's 2013 Work Plan - Continued to February C. Reports by Standing Committees 1. Communication and Education Chair Carr reminded the board that this past fall a meeting took place with the City's Communications Department, and HPB members Stegner, Sussman and herself. At the meeting, the intention of educating the public on preservation issues utilizing the internet and video .production was discussed. It was agreed that a periodic Facebook posting identifying a historic property and asking an engaging question to encourage input would be posted on a monthly basis. Ms. Carr explained that she has been working on providing the text for the posts and will submit them to the Communications Department soon. Regarding the historic video clips, the idea producing one program highlighting the importance of heritage preservation in the community was revamped to creating numerous, short (2 -3 minute) clips, with the thought that it appears the public has been too impatient to sit through programs as long as 25 minutes; however shorter clips can spark interest and are well received. The Communications Department is currently looking for sponsors to fund the project as well as talent to serve as the preservation spokesperson. In the meantime, the HPB will be responsible for providing the content for the shows. Board members expressed excitement for the project and agreed to work on content for the shows at the February meeting. 2. Research and Designation of Eligible Properties and Heritage Landmarks Member Moore reported that he and Planner Repya met shortly after the December HPB meeting to discuss the best approach to inviting owners of properties determined eligible heritage landmark designation to consider the potential for landmark designation. Moore pointed out that some of the properties on the list have been identified as having potential for designation, and have either never been approached, or approached long ago. It is thought that by inviting the property owners as a group, perhaps as part of the City's 125` anniversary activities, they may be more receptive. Mr. Moore concluded that he and Ms. Repya are in the process of drafting the landmark invitation letters when the property owners.will be invited to an informational meeting which could possibly be held at the Grange Hall. A date for the meeting has not been identified, however sometime during May (Preservation Month) could be timely. Board members thanked Mr. Moore for the report and expressed an interest in learning more about the landmark designation project in the future. 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes _ January 8, 2013 3. Design Review Process The evaluation sheet approved at the December meeting was laminated and given to each board member as a resource when evaluating Certificate of Appropriateness requests in the Country Club District. The work of this committee has been completed for now. D. Reports by Working Committees I. Southdale Center Preservation Member Moore reported that at the most recent meeting of the Edina Historical Society (EHS), Executive Director Marci Matson reported that she had a brainstorming session with Laurie Van Dalen from Southdale Center on ways the Historical Society can work with Southdale Center. At the meeting, Ms. Van Dalen was clear that Simon Properties will not relinquish ownership of its archives, but will consider creating a legal document outlining a long -term loan. Also, Southdale staff will work on inventorying the material, using an Excel spreadsheet format that EHS can interface with their software. Ms. Matson also reported on the following upcoming and potential EHS events in April centering on Southdale: • Southdale will celebrate the completion of its remodeling project. • The PBS special "10 Buildings that Changed America" (including Southdale) will air. Potential for a viewing party with a 1956 theme and speaker. • A possible Southdale exhibit/photo display, to coincide with the PBS special • "History Happened Here" Quasquicentennial exhibit posters displayed at Southdale (near original art pieces) • Christmas 1956 display to coincide with the year Southdale opened. Board members thanked Mr. Moore for the report noting that it is good to see the EHS is having positive conversations with the Southdale staff. Discussion ensued regarding the continued hope that Southdale will consider recognizing the significant art pieces as heritage landmarks in Edina; noting that these pieces are the only original artifacts of the iconic 1956 mall; and it is important that they stay in Edina. 2. Sustainability - No Report 3. Archaeology Survey of Edina and CLG Grant Planner Repya reminded the Board that at the December meeting the question arose as to whether the Three Rivers Park District had considered the archaeology of Nine Mile Creek in their studies for the proposed Nine Mile Bike Trail project. Responding to that inquiry, Ms. Repya contacted the Three Rivers Park District and learned that a study of the creek area from Tracy Avenue to France Avenue is proposed in 2015. At that time a review of the cultural resources in the area would be included in the study. Ms. Repya pointed out that it is premature for the HPB to address this issue, and recommended that it be flagged for inclusion in an upcoming 2014 -2015 work plan. Board members agreed that was a good idea. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes January 8, 2013 Vill. OTHER BUSINESS A. Recognizing Edina's 125" Anniversary (Quasquicentennial) Planner Repya observed that the HPB has identified a desire to plan activities celebrating the City's Quasquicentennial, and she suggested that the Board could center the activities celebrating Preservation Month in May on the Quasquicentennial theme. She pointed out that in addition to the annual Council Proclamation, Heritage Award and tour of the Cahill School & Grange Hall, the HPB could consider additional opportunities to share the City's history with the public. Board members agreed that would be a good idea. Member Stegner suggested inviting members of the Edina Historical Society to an HPB meeting to discuss ways to work together. Chair Carr suggested adding that "Planning for the Quasquicentennial" to the February agenda. The Board agreed that would be a good idea. B. Edina's Cemeteries Planner Repya reported that at the last HPB meeting the Board discussed an article about the Jewish Cemetery on France Avenue and asked that the topic be included on the January agenda. Since the December meeting, Ms. Repya reported that there was no new information to report on the cemetery; and she suggested that if the Board has an interest in Edina's cemeteries — of which there are two (the Jewish Cemetery on France Avenue and the Grandview Cemetery in the northwest corner of the City), that the topic be added to the Work Plan for 2014. Board members agreed that addressing the cemeteries at this time would be deviating from the 2013' Work Plan, and considering them in the future made sense. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None X. STAFF COMMENTS None VI. NEXT MEETING DATE February 12, 2013 XII. ADJOURNMENT 8:15 p.m. Member Davis moved for adjournment at 8:15 p.m. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya I MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 17, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Sierks, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member lyer to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF DEC. 20.2012 Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member LaForce to approve the minutes of Dec. 20, 2012. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Traffic Safety Committee Report of Jan. 2, 2013 Section 6.1. Director Houle stated that staff evaluated the request from the ETC to install stop signs to complete the basket weave and stop signs in general and they still did not meet warrants. He said staff does not recommend installing stop signs, but is recommending changing the direction of the yield sign from the north /south movement to east /west and, if the ETC recommends the stop sign, to install it on the east /west movement of traffic. Installation would be in February /March. Member Laforce asked what the rationale was for the east /west recommendation and director Houle explained that it is based on the flow of traffic which is more apt to continue flowing on the north /south movement and, there is less traffic on the east /west movement. He said they prefer to give the right -of -way to where there is more traffic. Member Janovy said the request for the stop sign was from a resident and asked if the requestor has been informed. Mr. Houle said it is customary for staff to call and inform requestors of the recommendation. Member Janovy said she appreciated the analysis and that she was comfortable with the yield sign as proposed in the report. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to forward the Jan 2 Traffic Safety Committee Report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. . Updates Student Members None. f Bike Edina Task Force Received minutes of Dec. 13, 2012. Member Janovy said in addition to discussing their role at their January meeting, three residents who are interested in having a mountain bike trail at Braemar presented their idea. Living Streets Working Group Received minutes of Jan. 8, 2013. Member Thompson said they reviewed and made changes to the draft Living Streets Policy. He said most of the work is completed and in February, they would like to present it to the ETC for review and discussion. He said they would also talk about the possibility of dissolving the working group and form a committee that would be responsible for shaping the policy'and holding public meetings to gather feedback. The committee could include ETC members, Councilmembers, members from other boards and commissions, etc. Transportation Options Working Group a.. Presentation on Senior Transportation Options for Edina —Courtney Whited and Hope Melton Member Whited introduced Ms. Hope Melton, a member of the working group. Member Whited said the working group's charge is: • To review current transportation options for Edina seniors aging in place; including volunteer driver services, public transportation, private commercial transportation, and non - motorized transportation, and identity the need for additional services as appropriate. • Review and make recommendations for additional services and infrastructure improvements to meet the transportation needs of Edina seniors aging in place. • To recommend partnerships and outside sources of funding to help meet the transportation needs of Edina seniors aging in place. • To identify other populations who may also be served by these measures. Member Whited and Ms. Melton said the group reviewed and evaluated five options for senior transportation in Edina. The following minimum guidelines were established to evaluate and rank each one on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being not acceptable and 5 being meets all expectation(s): 1. No eligibility guidelines (senior, disabled) 2. Rider to any destination, for any reason 3. Service hours 4. Service area at minimum covers Edina, can also serve VA Hospital in Minneapolis, Methodist /Park Nicollet Clinics, Tria Orthopedics, University of Minnesota Hospital and downtown Minneapolis clinics 5. Wheel chair equipped vehicles 6. Cost per ride, one -way fare, and commitment to serve low income people 7. Paid drivers and /or volunteer drivers background checked and fully trained 8. Willingness to grow with rider needs and to coordinate with other program The following companies were evaluated and their scores were: 1. PRISM Express (People Responding in Social Ministry) - 39 2. VEAP Transportation (Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People) —32.5 3. ITN (Independent Transportation Network) — 20.5 (not established) 2 4. Metro Transit public transit BE Line —not scored because they felt it would inaccurately tabulate a perfect score. 5. Streetcar (reviewed but not scored — listed as a future wish, if funding could be secured) They made the following recommendations: • Coordination of existing services models to serve the transportation needs of seniors in Edina. There is no set up fees or time needed. The programs are well established in the communities they currently serve. Additionally, potential funders embrace the fact that programs are coordinating and not duplicating services so that they are funding one entity for many needs Versus many entities for individual needs. • Together, PRISM Express dial -a -ride and VEAP Volunteer driver transportation can provide the affordable, social services style of transportation that Edina seniors desire. PRISM Express can be set up to serve the general public in Edina and not just seniors like they have been doing in the City of St. Louis Park for the past one and a half year. • That the City charge a "transportation fee" of $3.28 per residency to housing developers, i.e., new housing being erected in the Southdale parking lot, similar to the Pedestrian and Cyclists franchise fee to help subsidize transportation options in Edina. Could also establish a "parking spot user fee" similar to City of Eden Prairie. Work on a City TDM. The City does need to put a line item in its budget for funds to pay for this service. Riders will be charged a suggested donation fee to ride, based on their stated monthly income. • Concerns were discussed if Edina was to go with a brand new transit option, i.e. ITN, that this would add another layer to an already fragmented transportation system. Additionally, because of the relatively high cost per trip, the ITN option appears to be set up to serve the financially advantaged population and not for the general public. • Consider competition for funding dollars & volunteers if establishing a brand new program(s) versus going with existing programs. Discussion Member Janovy asked what they learned about other volunteer services in Edina. Member Whited said there were a couple churches with driver volunteer programs but they have all frizzled out. She said they are hard programs to maintain. Member Janovy also asked about senior housing that have their own transportation. Member Whited said there are still a few but most are moving away from owning their own transportation be of costs and regulations and is contracting with existing services. She said they tend to be limited in their schedule to grocery shopping and eating out once weekly and this does not suit the needs. Member LaForce said he liked the criteria that was used and asked if they looked at the demand for the service, understanding that this was not part of their charge. They did not look at demand; however, member Whited said she works with the state's demographer and a report was just published about transportation needs of seniors and the disabled that she can provide later on. Additionally, she said there used to be a Dial -A -Ride in Edina that frizzled out and those riders are most likely relying on friends, neighbors, family, Metro Transit and Metro Mobility. She said the seniors are making do with these options and are getting by going to necessary appointments like doctor's visits. Ms. Melton added that they cannot volunteer in the community or socialize. Member Franzen asked if the fee would be used to fund the gap between $3.50 and $10.98. Member Whited said PRISM's average riders pay $3.50 or $4.50 but their true cost is $10.98. She said they have a 3 funder that pays $5.00 per ride for those 60 and older and City of St. Louis Park pays $20,000 annually which is $5.00 per rider. Student member Schweiger asked how does a financially advantaged senior citizen gets around Edina and member Whited said there are private programs with concierge services that they pay to transport them, help with cleaning, cooking, etc. He asked why would they stop using the concierge service and use the one being recommended. Ms. Melton said they would not necessarily need to stop using the concierge service; however, they are discussing transportation unlike the concierge services that also offers cleaning, cooking, etc. Member Whited added that transportation cost is $25 each way in these programs versus $10 roundtrip. Member lyer asked if riders would be able to schedule rides by calling a dispatch center and if the City would be involved with this. Member Whited said yes they would call to schedule rides but the City would not be involved except to the_ extent like St. Louis Park is in marketing the program. He also asked if there is a similar city that they could learn from and how they raised the funds. Member Whited said St. Louis Park would be a good example; she said it took five years for them to approve the program. Member Thompson asked about St. Louis Park's funding and member Whited said it is an amount that is set aside because the program is a priority for them. Member Braden asked how was 55 and 60 established as a senior age and member Whited said the senior age is established by their funders. Member Braden asked if it could be increased and Member Whited said it is currently being discussed. Communications Committee No update. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues No comment. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Chair, report on 2012 Accomplishments The following are a list of the ETC's accomplishments for 2012: 1. Living Streets a. Created the Living Streets Policy Framework 2. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund a. Helped create ordinance for franchise fees and policy for implementing fund. 3. Safe Routes to Schools Comprehensive Plan a. Initiated study to be completed in 2013 4. Bike Projects a. TLC Bike Blvd Project b. Other miscellaneous bikeway projects 5. France Avenue Pedestrian Bridge Rescoping 6. Review of Capital Projects a. Tracy Avenue 4 b. Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects c. Gallagher Drive and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements 7. Review of Traffic Safety Committee Reports 8. ETC Bylaws 9. Formation of working group a. Communications Committee Member Franzen asked about the use of sod versus hydroseeding. Director Houle said staff is currently doing research and they are favoring hydroseeding. Director Houle will share more with the ETC at the February meeting. Member Thompson said his term will expire Feb. 1. He said it was a pleasure serving and getting to know everyone. Member Janovy said she emailed questions to Director Houle because there has been discussion in the community about construction traffic and the impacts on neighborhoods. She said the Planning Commission has a subcommittee looking at residential reconstruction and they've had two public meetings and she believes traffic will be one of the issues and the ETC should be aware of this. She requested a detail report on the France Avenue Pedestrian project. Chair Nelson thanked member Thompson for his service and made the following comments: • He attended a City of Richfield public works department meeting regarding W. 66th Street. He said the City received funding for reconstructing the roadway and have set up a series of meetings through March to gather feedback. He said he plans on attending the meetings. W. 66th Street. connects to the Southdale area. • Requested adding the Southwest Light Rail Transit to a future agenda for discussion. • Construction of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will begin in 2014 and he requested adding this to the agenda. STAFF COMMENTS A. 2011 Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey Results Director Houle said member lyer asked recently if staff had ever surveyed residents after projects were completed and the information that was handed out are the results of a 2011 survey of residents in the 2010 neighborhood reconstruction project areas. He said staff is planning on surveying residents in the 2011 neighborhood reconstruction project areas and would like feedback on the survey from the ETC and the communications committee. Member Franzen asked if staff has looked at using electronic surveys and Director Houle said he is open to this but would still need to send hard copies. Other feedback was observations made of residents' responses. Director Houle gave the following updates: • The 2013 neighborhood reconstruction projects will bid in February or March 5 Final plans for the France Avenue Pedestrian project will be submitted to MnDOT Feb. 4 and distributed to the ETC at the February meeting. Plan review time by MnDOT is approximately six weeks. • The 2013 ETC Workplan will be emailed to everyone tomorrow. He attended a webinar hosted by Transit for Livable Communities on Best Practices on Pedestrian Wayfinding. He said staff is currently working on a wayfinding system for the 50th & France area and soon will be doing same for pedestrians and bikers. He will be attending another class and recommended that.the ETC also consider attending. Chair Nelson said he has already signed up for the class. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE. - 2013 NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session # of Mtgs ; Attendance %` Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 0 0% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 160 % Franzen, Nathan 2/1 /2016 1 1 100, %0 I er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 1 100 % Janovy, Jennifer' 2/1/2014 1 1 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 100 % Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 100 %. Schwei er, Steven student 1 1 100% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 100% Thompson, Michael 2/1 /2013 1 7 100% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 100% A � REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Friz To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M IX. E. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Date: March 5, 2013 Information Subject: Edina Transportation Commission Communication Committee Recommendations Action Requested: No Action Requested Information / Background: Attached are recommendations for communication needs from the Edina Transportation Commission. Attachments: ETC Communication Committee Recommendations 2/21/2013 G:\ EngineeringU nfras tructum\Streets\TraPo[ \TRANSP COMM\Correspondance\2013 Corr\hem IX.E ETC Communication Committee Recommendadons.doot City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 ETC Communication Committee Recommendations 2M/2013 The role of the Communications Committee is to identify communications needs and recommend strategies to City staff. The Committee also acts as a sounding board for work that is in process. The Committee recommends the ETC forward the following recommendations to City Communications staff and the City Council. Recommendations 1 Staff should develop comprehensive communication plans to address the following current transportation initiatives: a France Avenue Crossings Project. This project requires an immediate and comprehensive communication effort. b Safe Routes to Schools Study. This study is currently underway and will result in a SRTS plan. A communications plan should be prepared that focuses on the benefits of active transportation to school, city and school district collaboration, and role the SRTS plan will play in qualifying the city for future SRTS grants. c Living Streets. This policy is still in development. A communications plan should communicate the benefits of a Living Streets policy and the connection of this policy to goals and objectives in Vision 20/20 and the Comprehensive Plan. It should place the city's Living Streets policy in context with county, regional, state, and federal transportation policy and industry best practices (engineering, planning, public health, etc.). Staff should implement communication plans well in advance of policy adoption (such as in the case of Living Streets and SRTS) and project construction (such as in the case of France Avenue and other infrastructure projects). At the very least a successful plan should identify communication objectives, audiences, messages, media, spokespersons, partners, etc. A successful communication effort should provide all stakeholders (internal and external) with an accurate and meaningful understanding of the initiative. At the very least stakeholders need to know: a What's the history for this initiative? b What were the critical issues? c What are the project goals? d What are the tangible benefits? e What are the project's costs? f What is the schedule? g What are the key milestones? h How will it benefit residents? i They should also have a vehicle for sharing feedback and getting answers to specific questions. 3 Other recommendations: a The Edina Police Department should be involved in communicating the rules about how to use various bike facilities around town. The idea of offering presentations, similar to the coyote presentations, has been discussed with Chief Long. The communications committee recommends pursuing this further. We believe that the City should undertake an effort to help homeowners understand what transportation rights -of -way are and what is and isn't allowed within them. The City of Golden Valley has a helpful web page on this subject that may provide some insights about how we might proceed. See http:// www .goldenvalleymn.gov /streets/row /index.php c Signage and road markings are critical to helping people understand how to use bike facilities. We recommend an effort to standardize all signage and road markings within the city in accordance with MN MUTCD and best practices. Placement of signs should be context sensitive, with unnecessary signs avoided. d The effectiveness of video programming as a means for communicating important city initiatives should be evaluated in light of low viewership and audience reach. e Finally, we recommend the City make an ongoing effort to communicate internally and to residents the City's vision for a fully integrated, multi-modal transportation system that safely, conveniently and equitably serves all users (ages, abilities, and income levels) and modes (motorists, transit riders, bicyclists and pedestrians). r� 1 A0 Green Line LRT Extension Corridor Management Committee January 2, 2013 A0MetroTr.-.t em w0 M o PPTVTnn �l EDEN PRAIRIE I MINNETONKA I EDINA i HOPKINS I ST. LOUIS PARK I MINNEAPOLIS SOUTHWEST z Today's Topics • Preliminary Engineering Consultants Contract Awards • Peer Review Consultant Contract Request for Proposal (RFP) • Environmental Program Update — Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) — Public Comment Period Ended — Responsible Government Unit (RGU) Authority Transfer to Met Council — Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) RFP • 2013 Project Look Ahead 1/2/2013 1 SOUTHWEST Preliminary Engineering Consultants Contract Awards AGMetrDTr�it I� 00 11 M p 1PVLJTAN EDEN PRAIRIE I MINNETONKA I EDINA I HOPKINS I ST. LOUIS PARK I MINNEAPOUS r- SOUTHWES Preliminary Engineering Consultants Scope of Work - 30% Engineering Southwest LRT Project Office Independent Engineering Prelimina rY Engineering Cons Peer Review Civil/Track Utility Bridges & Stations & Engineering Relocation Structures Streetscape Systems Operations & Project Engineering Maintenance Controls Facility 1/2/2013 2 { SOUTHWEST Jr Preliminary Engineering Consultants Procurement Schedule Advertise RFPs August 17, 2012 Hold pre - proposal conferences Receive proposals Interview proposers Conduct proposal evaluations /negotiations Award & sign contracts / Issue Notices -to- Proceed September 6, 2012 October 2, 2012 Oct 30 — Nov 2, 2012 Nov - Dec 2012 December 19, 2012 SOUTHWEST Preliminary Engineering Consultants Procurement Process — Evaluation Panels • Consists of six members for each procurement — Southwest LRT Project Office (2) — Light Rail Operations — MnDOT — Hennepin County — Community Works • Identifies most qualified proposer • Provides recommendation to the Council 19 1/2/2013 3 SOUTHWEST Preliminary Engineering Consultants (PEC) Procurement Process — Technical Advisory Groups • Consists of six members for each procurement PEC West PEC East - Southwest LRT Project Office - Southwest LRT Project Office - MnDOT - MnDOT - Eden Prairie - Hopkins - Hopkins - Minneapolis - Minnetonka - St. Louis Park - Metropolitan Transportation - Three Rivers Park District Services Provides technical review and input SOUTHWEST Preliminary Engineering Consultants Scope of Work - 30% Engineering ,r„4F,, Full SWLRT Alignment ., $,.t CP B.. Lake SPU, 1/2/2013 4 Preliminary Engineering Consultants December 19, 2012 Council actions: • Awarded PEC West contract to AECOM — Contract amount not -to- exceed $16,787,963 — Proposal achieves 17% DBE goal • Awarded PEC East contract to Kimley -Horn and Associates — Contract amount not -to- exceed $16,788,349 — Proposal achieves 17% DBE goal SOUTHWEST im Preliminary Engineering Local Funding: Sources CTIB: HCRRA: $55.8 M (60 %) $18.6 M (20 %) State: $18.6 M (20 %) Total PE budget: $93 million 1/2/2013 5 SOUTHWEST Preliminary Engineering Local Funding: Commitments $18.6 M: - HCRRA $55.8 M: All funds All funds committed ?, committed $11.6 M $ 7.0 M committed remaining Total PE budget: $93 million SOUTH'VVEST44;1 Funding for Preliminary Engineering Consultants • Funding for PE • Amount expended to date* • Balance available for PE • Planned expenditures — Complete 30% engineering * As of November 30, 2012 $81.4 MM 3.8 MM $77.6 MM $33.6 MM 1/2/2013 SOUTHWEST _ Peer Review Consultant Contract Request for Proposal (RFP) A 00 MEfI1DPOLITMI EDEN PRAIRIE I MINNETONKA I EDINA I HOPKINS I ST. LOUIS PARK I MINNEAPOLIS Peer Review Consultant (PRC) Procurement Schedule Major Milestones Dates Hold pre - proposal conference 1/23/2013 Interview proposers Apr 2013 Award & sign contract May 2013 W 14 1/2/2013 7 PRC — Scope of Work • Complete engineering reviews on plans, calculations and specifications. — 30% Design — 60% Design — 90% Design • Conduct spot reviews on engineering work products r" SOUTHWESTTj�L 6 PRC — Independent Reviews • Activities managed by the SPO Deputy Project Director • Precluded from participating on any other SWLRT consulting contracts • SPO will make final determination on PRC reviews and recommendations 1/2/2013 0 ,1 -- -__- SOUTHWEST EnvironmenW Program Update Ae m&.T.,w MLTRof.m.a N EDEN PRAIRIE I MINNETONKA I EDINA I HOPKINS I ST. LOUIS PARK I MINNEAPOLIS m Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Schedule Nov 13, 2012 Public Hearing — Hennepin County Government Center, A -2400 Nov 29, 2012 Public Hearing — Eden Prairie City Hall Dec 31, 2012 DEIS public comment period closed 1/2/2013 V] SOUTHWEST 9 DEIS Public Hearing • Dates and locations: — 11/13/12, Hennepin County Government Center, A -2400 4:00 to 5:00 PM, public open house (Public Service Level) 4:30 PM, Formal Public Hearing — 11/14/12, St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd 5:00 to 6:00 PM, public open house 6:00 PM, Formal Public Hearing — 11/29/12, Eden Prairie City Hall, 8080 Mitchell Road 5:00 to 6:00 PM, public open house 6:00 PM, Formal Public Hearing 20 DEIS Summary of Comments • 441 comments received as of December 13 — 338 written comments (email, postal mail, comment cards) — 103 verbal comments received during public hearings • Minneapolis — 22 comments • St. Louis Park — 52 comments • Eden Prairie — 29 comments • Examples of themes — Freight rail — Impacts to traffic — Impacts to businesses — Impacts to trails 1/2/2013 k 10 1� DEIS Public Comment Process • Hennepin County collected comments • Upon the close of the comment period, Hennepin County to turn over all comments received to the Council • SPO is using Project Management Software, e- Builder, to capture comments and track analysis and responses during Final EIS (FEIS) development • FTA and the Council will consider all comments submitted and provide responses to substantive comments in the FEIS Responsible Government Unit Authority • Responsible Government Unit (RGU) authority transferred from HCRRA to Council on December 31, 2012 - Required under Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) - Assigned to the government unit with greatest authority over project - Council responsible for environmental process, including development of FEIS - Council and HCRRA approved transfer effective as of close of comment period - Notice will be published in Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Monitor on January 7, 2013 2, 22 1/2/2013 11 SOUTHWEST 23 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) Consultant - Procurement Schedule Advertise RFP Dec 2012 /Jan 2013 Proposals Due Jan /Feb 2013 Interview proposers Feb 2013 Proposal evaluations / negotiations Mar /Apr 2013 Contract Award / Notice to Proceed May 2013 SOUTHWEST 24 FEIS Consultant — Scope of Work • Prepare FEIS • Support Agency Coordination Activities • Support Public Involvement Activities • Support Environmental Permitting Activities 1/2/2013 12 SOUTHWEST 2013 Project Look Ahead ©MetroTrarsit ® 00 METPOEUI.IT,W ��..11 EDEN PRAIRIE I MINNETONKA I EDINA I HOPKINS I ST. LOUIS PARK I MINNEAPOLIS SOUTHWEST Project Development Overview Project Development National & Minnesota Environmental Policy Acts (NEPA & MEPA) SWLRT Community Works Project Public Involvement 2011 2012 2013 2014 Entry into Municipal Consent 30% Design Final Design Preliminary Engineering October - December 2012: F FA Record of DEIS Comment Period Decision (ROD) nvironmental Impact Statement Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) GMetroTransit MEO RORN�ITµ 10, 1/2/2013 13 27 PE Activities — Engineering & Design Key Tasks • Conduct Geotechnical and Field Survey Work • Resolve Design Challenges and Technical Issues • Prepare Municipal Consent Plans • Prepare 30% Design Plans and Specs Key Milestones • Q3 2013: Submit Municipal Consent Plans for Agency Review • Q4 2013: Complete Municipal Consent Approval Process • Q1 2014: Finalize 30% Design Plans and Specs W PE Activities — Environmental Key Tasks • Prepare FEIS • Conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessment • Conduct Phase II Archaeological Survey • Conduct Architectural /Historic Structures Survey Key Milestones • Q2 2013: Issue NTP for FEIS Consultant • Q4 2013: Complete Phase I Environmental Site Assessment • Q4 2013: Complete Phase II Archaeological Survey • Q4 2013: Complete Architectural / Historic Structures Survey • Q3 2014: FTA issues Record of Decision (ROD) 1/2/2013 14 29 PE Activities — Project Wide Key Tasks • Revise New Starts Application • Update Management Plans • Update Ridership and Financial Forecasts Key Milestones • Q3 2013: Submit New Starts Update for FFY 2015 to FTA • Q2 2014: Request Entry into Final Design • Q4 2014: Complete Preliminary Engineering / Enter Final Design 2013 Key Issues /Decisions • Freight Rail Co- Location and Relocation • Eden Prairie Alignment Alternatives • Operations and Maintenance Facility 30 1/2/2013 15 More Information Online: www.SWLRT.orq Email: SWLRT metrotransit.orq SOUTHWEST 1/2/2013 16 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager ovr Date: March S, 2013 Subject: Residential Redevelopment Management Plan Action Requested: Agenda Item 4: Action i:.! Discussion Xi Information f..1 Receive this nuernorandum and attached draft ordinance for discussion at the March 5 Ciry Council meeting and consider the draft ordinance and associated recommendations at the March 19 City Council meeting. information / Background: At its February 19 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff and City Attorney to review the City's "Construction Management Plan" (CMP) document and procedures in order to evaluate the overall use and effectiveness of the CMP in regulating residential redevelopment projects. I worked with City Attorney Knutson and City staff leadership on that review, which has resulted in a proposed new regulatory strategy, ordinance and enforcement plan. New-ha a a,t ry,_Su acegy -The new regularory strategy is to more strongly leverage the issuance of the demolition permit. The issuance of the demolition permit is a crucial step in the residential redevelopment process. An existing home cannot be razed without a demolition permit from the City. A demolition perrnit will not be issued unless the permit applicant can demonstrate ownership of the property. A builder /developer is likely to be more deliberate and careful about purchasing an existing house far the purpose of redeveloping it if they know the issuance of the demolition permit is noc a {eit de compier. Our proposed new regulatory strategy is to implement new requirements Char must be satisfied before the issuance of the demolition permit. Some of those new requirements include: 1. Proof of insurance; naming City as additional insured 2. Submission of $10,000 cash escrow or letter of credit 3. Submission of soil investigation report 4. Submission of storm water management and erosion control plans 5, Submission of photography of existing conditions in neighborhood 6. Submission of proposed building plans to the Building Official 7. facilitation of a neighborhood meeting to share building plans v✓ith neighbors Under the new regulatory sumogy, a demolition perrnit: will nor. he issued until all of these conditio ns are, satisfied. City of Edina , 4801 W 500, St. - Edina, MN 55424 . f RIPORT ! RECOMMENDATION New,,Ke$ulato� y O� d,i_nance The City Attorney has drafted a new or-dina11 e cl}at adds a new section to Chapter 4. The proposed ordinance is attached to this memorandum. It is carries it draft watermark to indicate that it is not in final form. I am providing it: to Council Members at the March 5 Council meeting for the purpose of seeking your input on the proposed draft at the March 19 Council meeting. The City Arc rney.drafted ihe. new or'dinanc , based on the current Construction Managemept. Plan (CMP). By incorporating the terms of the CMP. into the new ordinance, we have created a fijlly`enf6rce, able CMP that Is backed by.the authority o "f otii- City Code. Neyv.Enfoi^cemetlt Plan — The City's enforcement response'to the quality of life issues created by residential redevelopments ha' not beericonsistently our best work. RequestsJor enforcement corne to the City in an uncoordinated manner,, The City's enforcement actions can be.just. as uncoordinated. The answer to this problcni is to coordinate the City's enforcement: response by focusing the responsibility and accountability for that response into a single new fulitime enforcement employee. The new FTE•will be,responsible for coordinating all aspects of the residential redevelopment process for builders, potential new residents, current residents and Ciry staff. The new FTE will coordinate the pre- pernnit neighborhood meeting; conduct site reconnaissance; answer questions from concerned residents; coordinate City enforcement actions; and keep Ciry staff and Council informed through the redevelopment process, estimate the Cost of this new enforcement, initiative to be approximately $100,000 per year. In order to fund this new FTE, I recommend the City increase the price of the demolition permit from its current: price of approximately $200 to $:1,500. City staff are projecting the City will issue a total of 100 demolition permits in 2013. If we issue 70 permits under the new permit price, we will be able to cover the cost of thC., new FTE through this new revenue soured. SUMMARY The challenge the City is facing wick residential redevelopment is not instn-mountable, It is a challenge we. Should welcome because of.what'is says about the desirability of the community. I believe'che City can manage its residential redevelopment challenges better if we, as Council and staff, are willing to change the way we approacl'the challenge. I will recommend at the March 19 City Council rneetfng drat the City Council approve the proposed new regulatory strategy, approve a new regulatory ordinance and approve the new.ei)forcement plan. We are anticipating a busy 2013 construction seasons: If the Council is open to the changes I alai proposing, the sooner:we put then) into place, the better for all concerned: ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING DEMOLITION PERMITS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 4 of the I'dina City Code is amended by adding Section 411 to read: Section 411 — DEMOLITION PERMITS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 411.01 Purpose. The demolition of single family homes and the subsequent construction of a new home can disrupt the quietude of the neighborhood, damage adjacent public and private property, create storm water and erosion problems, and result in littering and other nuisances. The purpose of this Section is to prevent problems associated with the demolition of single family homes and the construction of new hornes. 4'11.02 Permit. The demolition of a single farnily home is prohibited without a permit issued by the Building Official. 411.03 Permit Application. The applicant must complete the application form provided by the City, pay the permit fee and furnish the City with the certificate of insurance, letter of credit, photographs and plans required by this Section. l he application must be signed by the contractor and the property owner. The permit holder must be both the contractor and the property owner. Doc. #I 68978v.3 RNK: 03101/20 13 411.04 Permit Requirements. Subd. 1 The applicant must furnish the City with a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the following required coverage: Commercial general liability, including XCU coverage: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence 52,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property I)amage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non- owned, hired), Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence The minimum insurance coverage must be maintained until six (G) months after the dernolition has been corpleted or, if a new home is being constructed, a certificate of occupancy has been issr.red. The City must be named as an additional insured. Subd. 2 The: applicant must furnish the City a cash escrow or letter of credit from a bank in a form acceptable to the City's Finance Director in an amount for $10,000, The City may draw on the letter of credit to reimburse the City for inspection and enforcement costs, to pay for the repair of damage to public and private property or to remedy any permit violation, The letter of credit must remain in place until the demolition is completed or, if a new home is being constructed until a certificate of occupancy has been issued by the Building Official. Subd. 3 If excavation will occur within twenty(20) feet of a property line, the applicant must furnish a soils investigation report prepared and signed by a registered professional engineer, who is competent in soil mechanics. The report must provide detailed plans to ensure that adjacent property will not be damaged by reducing lateral support for driveways, foundations, fences or lawns caused by excavation, demolition or construction activity. The report must be approved by the Building Official. The permit holder must adhere to the approved plan. Subd. 4 The applicant must submit stormwater and erosion control plans prepared and signed by a registered) professional civil engineer. The i:o .4r6S97 8 %,, RtiK: 03 /01 13013 plans must be approved by the Building Official and the permit holder must adhere to ti►e approved plans. The stormwater management plan rnust detail how stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainage system. The erosion control plan must document how proper erosion and sediment control will be maintained on a continual basis to contain on site erosion and protect on and off -site vegetation. Permit holder must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices at all time during the project when soil disturbing activities rnay result in sediment laden storm water runoff entering the inlet. The permit holder is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. Devices must be regularly cleaned out and emergency overflow must be an integral pail of the device to reduce the flooding potential. Devices must be placed to prevent the creation of driving hazards or obstructions. Subd. 5 The applicant must provide photographs of the existing condition of the property, curbs, sidewalks, streets, boulevard and trees adjacent to the property. Subd. G If a new home will be constructed on the site, the applicant must furnish the City building plans for the new home, meeting all ordinance requirements, which have been approved by the Building Official. Subd. 7 At least fifteen (.15) days before demolition commences, the permit holder must provide written notification to all property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the demolition site notifying tide property owners of the proposed demolition and construction plans, if applicable, and inviting them to a neighborhood meeting at the Edina City Hall. The neighborhood meeting must be held at least five (5) days before demolition commences. A sign must also be posted on the demolition site at least five (5) days before demolition commences identifying the permit holder, a contact name and phone number, and the site address. The sign must also provide a City phone number to call with any questions, complaints or concerns. The sign may not exceed six (G) square feet in a single - family residential zoning district and thirty -two (32) square feet in high density residential, commercial or industrial areas. The sign must be kept in place until the completion of demolition or if a new home is being constructed until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the home bx;ing constructed. 11.05 Permit Standards, Subd. 1 The permit holder must comply with the State Building Code, State Statutes and the City Code. Doe. i 68978%,.3 RNK:03!)1'2013 Subd. 2 Deliveries of equipment and material to the site, work crews on site and construction and demolition activity are prohibited except between the hOLlI -S of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. SUbd. 3 The permit holder must repair any damage to pr.lblic property, streets, sidewalks and adjacent properties. If damage occurs to the toregoing, it must be repaired within three (3) working days, unless the penflit Bolder has received written permission from the City Building Official to delay repairs to a later specified date. Subd. 4 Permit holder must maintain a five -foot (5') parking setback frorn driveways and a thirty -foot (30') parking setback from intersections. When parking on a street, a vehicle must be completely located on the street surface, parallel to and within twelve ('12) inches of the crlrb. Vehicles in violation of these requirements i-nay be towed in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 16813.035. On street parking of equipment other than motor vehicles is prohibited. Stopping, standing or perking a vehicle is prohibited, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic of- in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following places: a. On a boulevard between the sidewalk and roadway; b. Within five (5) feet of the intersection of any public or private driveway or alley with any street or highway; C. Where the vehicle will block a fire escape or the exit from any building; d. Where temporary signs prohibit parking. Parking is allowed on local streets if a twelve -foot (12) wide area is open for the traveled portion of the road. On collector and arterial roadways, a minimum of twenty -two feet (22') must be open for the traveled portion of the road. Off- street and off-site parking for on site workers is required to the extent practicable. Subd. 5 The peraiit holder must install and maintain a rock entrance pad or its equivalent at each location where vehicles enter or exit from the construction site, at locations approved by the City Building Official. Subd. 6 The site must be maintained in a neat and orderly condition at all times. Prior to leaving the construction site at the end of each day, permit holder rrrust remove empty cans, paper, plastic and other material that is not needed for construction, The permit holder must keep, streets, sidewalks, boulevard areas and adjacent properties clean from waste, Doc, f 16597Sv.3 4 RINK: 03160P2013 materials or refuse resulting from operations on the site. Inoperable equipment and equipment not being used on the site niust be removed within twenty four (24) hours. Where work on any project lies within Areas of pedestrian traffic or vehicul�Ar traffic, the project area must be cleaned and swept and all materials related to the project must be stockpiled in appropriate areas. Debris must be contained on the project site. No material may be deposited or stockpiled on the public streets, boulevards or sidewalks. At the end of each working day, the permit holder must remove any soil, trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any public sidewalk or street and must remove any trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any adjacent property. Subd. 7 DLISt control is the responsibility of the permit holder. 1 -he permit holder must eliminate dust problems within one (1) hour of receiving notice from the Building Official that there is a dust problem. Subd. 8 No building material, temporary sanitary facilities, dumpster or equipment other then motor vehicles may be placed within street right -of.. way, or on a sidewalk. Public sidewalks must be left open and unobstructed at all tinges. Subd. 9 Prior to commencing demolition, protective fencing approved by the Building Official must be installed around boulevard trees and trees that will not be removed. 411,06 Stop Work Orders. If the Building Official finds any work being perforr'ned in a dangerous or unsafe manner or that is in violation of the provisions of the permit, City Code or the State Building Code, the Building Official may issue a stop work order. The stop work order must be in writing and issued to the permit holder or the person doing the work. Upon issuance of a stop work order, the cited work must immediately cease, The stop work order must state the reason for the order and the conditions under which the cited work will be permitted to resun'le. 411.07 Misdemeanor. Violations of this Section or of the terms of approval of a permit issued under this Section are a misdemeanor. Doc. 4168973x.3 5 R\IK: 03/01/2013 Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon its passage and publiCatlon. First Reading: Second Reeding: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Suii'Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk Doc. f I G& ()78 •.3 � RNK:O',jO1!201., CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK |. ihe Undersigned duly appointed and GCbDg City Clerk for the City OfEdina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted hV the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting o[ 2O13. and aoreoo/dedinthe, K4inutos of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS nny hand and seal of said City this dGy0f .2013. Qty Clerk uv. -'�|^Sn7G,3, nx< :m'mzoo a rtn r S Coalition for Healthy Youth and Communities Report to the Community pop rd.a..r. ar ,^i Famll .irony. pix i � "••' 9 si aUf1.r1 NMYN ` r r . rtaao Sr ling " . • � I r . an aampY tar �..=. ;`"r p, art L roe (xecnM�n ` old Vadlny �f` �� :r s GnMily tfIInd- rb fncncIS a, ,., r u dq ..., n<.j. . - �ficvlr _ _ �w�r`r� 11J1 f.. VuNNIN� Heygran ry I C% %�j PINK BaSS to�`r S. h.1. MY 1 aM +O %....M~ N I n �� , ,xl 8slslMxll !1Y rm ltowt { jk•..l � Y� H 1W / �,•! _ MX 11 RIM �CY.V � SeKk4sGRI ;�e•t, /G.:y SF0►1C �rx1u5 '=. �M �� v! T P"" .,,,s... � x.�,rh! �' H7 dIWIWI � Sa�cfr � .wsi frpm�S \tt .— sOCCri fMTIhJ HN \\ME Fr sy _ c Md11 If1Y1S � �°K\ �� l" i 1 FrYnk lb(XCy r ' .. } " *.• T#.ker G� 1 cwn"' °.d.., HntA.ty #S MF MI\ d •" w.r. �y. i.,.`h w ker �d" 3w< tq..\m wMwtC� �iiLLY �Ud� iw.dv Ou:s� I -2HO , Fn'wy Ch *Yw+ .� 3 M� f011111 Yale ill 4�. ► ` _ �ulm r ''• d ad "�— Iln _4kBLOOMINGTOl \j\ Tri -city ��� �� Partners 1 c`G �° for Healthy Youth \ and Gornrnunities L bfoornington �7► r i •' "The most powerful tool we have to address our Nation's drug problem is preventing it before it even begins." GI ne"Mowske, Director of National Drug Control Policy This report covers Tri -City Partners coalition highlights from year 9 of a 10 -year Drug Free Community Grant through the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrations (SAMHSA). The coalition is now in the tenth and final year of federal funding, which will end on September 30, 2013. We look forward to continued collaboration with community partners and are currently exploring additional ways to sustain the efforts of the coalition. It is rewarding to look back and reflect on how the community and the nation have acknowledged that the work of coalitions like ours are a powerful and effective tool for youth substance use prevention. The TCP Coalition uses the Strategic Prevention Framework (SPF) during the planning process (graphic at right). The SPF is a commu- nity -based risk and protective factors approach to prevention with a series of community -level guiding principles. It reauires t_hP_ following systematic process: 1. AsseSS TCP's prevention needs based on data 2. Build TCP's prevention Capacity 3. Develop a strategic Plan 4. Implement effective community prevention programs, policies and practices Evaluate our efforts for outcomes Assessment Susta na ' J • Monitored alcohol and tobacco compliance check results for the three cities. The Bloomington results were presented to the Bloomington Advisory Board of Health • Compiled a summary of the 2011 Key Informant interviews and communicated them with coalition members through a presentation and also featured the results in the newsletter. Capacity . ■ Supported five different community high school youth initiatives for ongoing, underage drinking Prevention efforts. Groups involved in the initiatives included Edina High School Sober Squad, Kennedy High School IGNITE, Jefferson High School Prevention Group, and two Bloomington High School Captain Councils. Sponsored a three -day Life of an Athlete training. Life of an Athlete is a prevention program that emphasizes research about the impact of drugs and alcohol on student athletes and all young people. It also reinforces the value of good training habits, proper nutrition, strong communication skills and model citizenship. Sixty youth and thirty adults participated, including teams from Bloomington and Edina. Bloomington Public Health continued to provide contract services for Bloomington Public Schools in coordinating Safe and Drug Free Schools Program. This resulted in numerous joint prevention activities which included sponsoring two Chemical Health workshops for Bloomington Schools staff, sponsoring a parent workshop on substance use, distributing substance use prevention messages to parents and students and maintaining the Bloomington Safe House Parent Network. Assisted in planning and carrying out the annual, statewide Shutting Off the Tap to Teens and Young Adults skill - building conference for preven- tion professionals. Raising ■ Prepared and distributed TCP Coalition e- newsletter which was sent out Drug -Free Kids monthly to over 330 people. Advice by Age Informed community members about the Bloomington Social Host Ordi- nance and the Together We Stand Campaign in two interviews on the ® T A +_c4 Bloomington Today cable television program. �q =" ■ Promoted two multi -city Prescription Drug Collection Take Back events. .,.�- ■ Provided technical assistance to students at Kennedy and Jefferson high schools in developing and delivering interactive presentations to 375 eighth - graders on the importance of making healthy choices. ■ The Edina Action team developed the 2011 -2012 Together We Stand Social Marketing campaign and selected the message, "Who stands between kids and alcohol? We do." This team also worked on planning the We are in this Together Town Hall Forum. The Richfield Action Team partnered with the Family Partnership organization to begin planning for a substance abuse prevention project with Latino parents. The Bloomington Action Team worked with key community groups to participate in the "Who Stands Between Kids and Alcohol - We Do!" public service announcement. ■ Partnered with Bloomington Education Cable Television in developing and producing a Bloomington Public Service Announcement for the Together we stand Campaign. This PSA included diverse community groups including faith communities, schools, parents, youth, a liquor establishment, law enforcement and other city staff. � ary or The Bloomington BLOOMINGTON Social Host Ordinance MINNESOrA A social host ordinance J - holds persons criminally responsible for hosting events where •.' persons under 21 years of age are permitted to consume alcohol. A host is the person who knowingly provides a venue for an underage drinking party to occur, regardless of their age• and regardless of who provided the alcohol. A host is NOT a property owner or parent who was unaware of illegal alcohol consumption on their property while away. violation of the ordinance is a misdemeanor and is punishable by up to 90 days in jail and/ rtnering orafineofuplo S 1.000. Carried out Together We Stand Campaign through pa For more information, please visit the City of Bloomington websae and search for with schools, hotels /motels, businesses, liquor stores, fait 'sonal host' communities and other community organizations in delivering the key campaign message, "Who Stands Between Kids and Alcohol? We Do ?" • Continued to inform the Bloomington community about the Social Host Ordinance. • Co- Sponsored a "We Can Do This Together" Town Hall forum in Edina focused on youth substance use prevention. Provided three positive parenting workshops for Spanish- speaking parent groups in Bloomington and Richfield. ■ Presented the alcohol policies and deterring underage drinking at hotels /motels project for the Shutting of the Tap to Teens Conference. Distributed 4,000 "Raising Drug Free Kids: Advice by Age" booklets. Distributed 42 information packets to alcohol retailers in Bloomington, Richfield and Edina. Developed and distributed 6 Bloomington Safe House Parent Network newsletters with prevention information and resources. Evaluation m Conducted the Richfield Community Readiness Surveys to gather residents' opinions on the use of alcohol, tobacco, drug use and gambling by community members. ■ Evaluated feedback from forums and events held in the community.