The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013-03-05_WORK SESSIONAGENDA JOINT WORK SESSION EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA PLANNING COMMISISON CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY ROOM MARCH 5, 2013 5:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT— PLANNING COMMISSION WORKING GROUP UPDATE IV. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Mar 5 Work Session —1nt Mtng PC /Construction Management Plan 5:00 P.M. Tues Mar 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Mon Mar 11 Annual Meeting— Edina Advisory Boards & Commissions 5:00 p.m. Tues Mar 19 Work Session —Jnt Mtng Health Committee /Future do.town 5:30 P.M. Tues Mar 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Tues Apr 2 Work Session — Business Meeting /Neighborhood Assn. 5:30 P.M. Tues Apr 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Tues Apr 16 Work Session — Grandview Next Steps 5:30 P.M. Tues Apr 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Tue Apr 30 Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 -7:00 p.m. Tues May 7 Work Session —Jnt Mtng with HRRC 5:30 P.M. Tues May 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Tues May 21 Work Session — Budget 5:30 P.M. Tues May 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. -,n May 27 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed 's Jun 4 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. Tues Jun 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jun 18 Work Session —Jnt Mtng with EEC 5:30 P.M. Tues Jun 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Planning Commission Residential Working Group Update February 13th, 2013 Arlene Forrest, Mike Platteter, Ken Potts Of LIU ArN CityofEdina.com Planning Commission Residential Working Group - Goals • Review current residential rebuild situation. • Create and hold public input forums. • Evaluate public input results from forums and other correspondence. • Provide recommendations to Planning Commission / City Council. CityofEdina.com History on Residential Zoning Updates Similar issues were discussed in 2007 -08, with the following changes at that time: • Building height restrictions enacted, with a maximum of 35 -40' to the ridgeline. • Measured building height from existing grade rather than proposed grade. • New home's first floor elevation can only be a maximum of 1' higher than the existing home's floor elevation. • Increase of side yard setbacks on lots 50 -75 feet in width, on a sliding scale. • Eliminate bay window setback exception for home widths. Limiting residential FAR (floor /area ratios, which limits house sizes) was discussed but no action was taken by the Council. CityofEdinaxom Planning Commission Working Group, 1jrXV a .+ U Datt • Working Group started early November 2012 • City issued formal Construction Management Plan — December 2012. • Met with small stakeholder groups: residents, city staff, builders, relators • Reviewed resident letters /correspondence on issues. • Benchmarked national and surrounding city zoning ordinances. • Created and held residential public forums and city blog site for feedback. • Reviewed feedback to provide preliminary recommendations. CityofEdina.com CITY OF EDINA �4 to g O PC Residential Working Group Progress °'y�ltPo1NSE�• January RQ11 February 2013 March 2013 Blog on "Speak Up Edina" for j I Blog Discussion Jan -Feb - Resident Feedback Planning Commission - WG na 9th —— Initial Presentation Public Input Forum -Senior jCenter 10 -Noon Jan 26th Public Input Forum - Senior Center 7-9 ! `Jan 31st Summarize Feedback for I� Jan 31St - Feb 12th j Preliminary Recommendations --J I� I ,, Plante wing Commission - Working Group Report Out Feb 13th ✓ Planning Commission Discussion �� — with City Council for Next Steps March 5th I Next Steps based upon I Council Comments 1i TBD CityofEdina.com Current Residential Zoning Comparisons Less Restrictive More Restrictive IF Height Richfield Hopkins Wayzata SLP Mpls Edina Bloomington Front Setback Wayzata MPIs MPIs Richfield Hopkins Bloomington Edina Side Setback Mpls Richfield SLP Edina Hopkins Bloomington Wayzata Bldg. Coverage Bloomington Richfield SLP Hopkins Wayzata Edina Mpls* Impervious Area SLP Hopkins Edina Mpls Richfield Wayzata Bloomington Min Lot Size MpIs Richfield Hopkins SLP Edina Wayzata Bloomington Min Lot Width Mpls Richfield Hopkins SLP Wayzata Edina Bloomington * Minneapolis allows 50% lot coverage, but with a .5 FAR requirement CityofEdina.com PC Working Group, Themes Found to Date • New /Remodel Horne Size & Lot Modification Impacts: ®Most concerns on smaller city lots ( <75 width', <9,000sf) ®Massing /Height /Setbacks ® Grading and Stormwater Drainage ®Reduction - of Tree Canopy • New /Remodel Home Construction Project Impacts -: ® Site Debris /Trash Removal ® Site Excavation ® Work Hours/Noise ®Parking /Traffic . LIMaterial Staging CityofEdina.com C�II� DIP L0II�ip Approaching the Teardown /Rebuild Issues, Tiradeoffs a o Edina is fortunate to be an in- demand place to live, where people invest in the community and their homes o There 'is not a single or simple solution, many complicated issues How do individual property rights and .community rights intersect o One person's dream house can become another person's house nightmare Do not create more issues than are solved How do potential changes compare with surrounding communities Need to keep city policies & ordinances adapting to contemporary needs CityofEdinaxom CITY OO F EDINA Teardown 'Trend Not New or Unique to Edina "Homebuyers typically pursue the teardown option when drawn to an area because of proximity to employment, school quality or aesthetic appeal (e.g. streets with mature trees), but prefer a home size larger than the area offers " f4� Oi "Developers pursue the teardown option primarily .in areas where undeveloped land is scarce and the real estate market is strong. In such areas, the value of land exceeds the value of the house. Teardowns are likely if a developer can expect to sell a replacement home for about three times the initial amount of the target property" - American Planning Association, 2007 CityofEdina.com Typical Teardowns in Edina • Smaller lots and smaller homes • Northeast city quadrant and a portion of Northwest quadrants • Neighborhoods developed prior to 1950's • Established mature, older neighborhoods Y \4 ` City of Edina CityofEdina.com VMW Edina currently uses one zoning code to regulate home sizes Tools used in other communities to mitigate concerns: • New and Remodel Housing Design Review for neighborhood "fit" • New zoning or overlay districts where there are special requirements • Incentives for building reuse and providing for specific desired attributes • Construction guidelines that identify desired design characteristics • Written neighborhood "character" guidelines for new neighbors/builders ityofEdina.com Neighborhood Character? 0 • No truly objective definition, but frequently. cited • Some cites include descriptions of desired attributes as part of zoning language CityofEdina.com r, o- Cam Oy 130 w9 Lot Size Options /Density 4 TY. IIIHH • Maintain existing zoning, but this does not address reality of smaller city lot redevelopment • Current zoning was established after about one -third of the city was already developed with smaller sized lots. • Establish new lot size requirements, e.g. universally lower the lot size minimums to allow subdivisions of larger lots, 50' lots • Maintain current lot size standards but allow subdivisions into nonconforming building lots only on previously platted parcels 6tyofEdina.com Home Size: Issues Identified • New home construction can be significantly larger than many existing homes Home Size: Buildable Area Tools • Lot coverage or FAR limits • Setback dimensions e„4 • Height dimensions • Garage size and placement • Impermeable area 01 CityofEdina.com r- c Home Setbacks: Issues Identified • Current 5'- 10' interior side yard setback on lots <75' in width, in combination with lot coverage and height, can result in homes described as "too close together" Home Setbacks: Alternative Approaches • Increase the setback dimension (side yard setbacks need not be equal both sides of house) • Regulate home "sidewall architecture" • Increase accessory use set backs (sheds) • Consider changing sideyard setback uses — No egress windows in sideyards — Appropriate storm water drainage — Required access from front to rear yard ovte CityofEdina.com Height: Issues Identified • Oversized homes overshadowing existing homes • Neighborhood character is being changed g g g Height: Alternative Approaches • Change the way height is measured Highest point Mid -point of pitched roof • Reduce allowable height without eliminating two -story home construction • Use of construction guidelines o e Kill i�u�m u�uimi�iu CityofEdina.com Front Garages: Issues Identified • Garage is the dominant element of the house street frontage • Requirement per 850.08.1: "two fully enclosed spaces per dwelling unit" Front Garages: Alternative Approaches • Define the allowable location of the front -of- garage relative to the front -of -house • Establish maximum area of the front fagade that can be garage • Allow single car garages CityofEdina.com Stormwater /Grading: Issues Identified • Lack of stormwater control during construction • New home topography changes stormwater flow • This can allow additional stormwater into neighbor's yards • Lax enforcement of drainage plans • Retaining wall concerns, including cutting off tree roots Stormwater /Grading: Alternative Approaches • Require enhanced stormwater plan during construction oef� Cn `N ° • Require drainage plan for the new house and adjacent property • Require engineered retaining walls, reviewed by city • Require on -site stormwater mitigation, with no impact to adjacent properties • Direct water flow toward street through swales r r CityofEdina. com e Tree Canopy: Issues Identified • Tree protection during construction • Concern on loss of tree canopy in older neighborhoods • Environmental concerns for tree loss, including carbon sink loss, energy conservation shading effects, urban heat islands and erosion/stormwater control Tree Canopy: Alternative Approaches • Provide tree protection guidelines during construction • Provide tree ordinance for new construction/lot subdivisions • Address discretionary tree removal 0 • Incentives to leave trees • Require tree inventory and define preservation plan for mature trees • Require equivalency planting plan for trees removed o�ej •'YCUIt]'(7lie la, N ice= r ..' . �. CITY OF EDINA �o New /Remodel Home Construction. Issued Identified • Having a formal Construction Management Plan well received • Resident concerns on quality of life during construction in neighborhood • Lack of information before new home construction starts • Resident perception of lax city enforcement and /or follow -up, property infringement • Concerns that there are not penalties for builders breaking ordinances • Concerns on the overall construction work hours allowed and noise • Concerns on street congestion, especially with multiple new houses on block • Concerns on street damage and sidewalk maintenance during construction CityofEdina.com New /Remodel Dome Construction: Alternative Approaches o Update the Construction Management Plan. CON! b ° Create City phone hotline for resident concerns LogLog resident complaints and respond on action taken. p•<6tfw a<s.<w Ar•CiunOUepb rm.. MrK uamn emw CaCb.a W<Or ova °W -ft emne W.cae.e.�h ro <�s•..tle. ca.amn,•. m.,t.w p.e o�.ee r roMe r...... a....... ° Streamline overall enforcement within city depts. n•WV<P•arrorrw.i.4.ea<m . r.. •araeea k«e•oyq.rs m. rm. ®em+e. process 1�...•aa...4. om ° Require Plan enforcement retroactively., ° Require builders to meet with neighbors before construction. 5"—a oam ° More City enforcement on construction sites, visit weekly. S.C-- ° Create penalties for builders that break rules. L�.•. �a.�r.,�,m...�d,��m,��. „,,:..e� em79Dry btl<d,•1WaIWrC1•nWru4e 10•l�aWf6u QafaO•. ° Reduce construction hours evenings and weekends. e<una.vsWpw•n 2•.WA. waYna n. qn m,.w um<Om 111 w<n lw.. oq� ' - hmM nun••mt emq ®ut< W m.n.rw U1lapan Wr e,rp G+urr ramm:<mvmie•rretlm arw. A <e�<el do dptm<•nt mM tlro N utlb•/ ro ea tyg Ir qry oa pv.�4 a 4m•eM <sqd i►v • Enforce sidewalk maintenance during construction. - as +o.e.u.oce<m aw..m.,m•eeraw<.s �a...+ W re.•c Wmrmnw rrw.sr • Limit duration of construction after permit issued. r¢wa m A• p<mblr W <ro <voaumo• wry Cmrp v<on a � pnem•n tl mmeva a mm r • Require builder Letter of Credit (LOC) for public infrastructure damage during const. CityofEdina.com 5 Summary of Findings: New /Remodel Dome Size & Lot Modification Impacts: ®Most concerns on smaller city lots ( <75 width;', <9,000sf) ®Massing /Height /Setbacks ® Grading and Stormwater Drainage ® Reduction of Tree Canopy New /Remodel Home Construction Project Impacts: ® Site Debris /Trash Removal ® Site Excavation ® Work Hours/Noise ®Parking /Traffic ®Material Staging CityofEdina.com CITY OF :DII�TA Planning Commission topics for City Council Work Session Specific recommendations C Enhance Construction Management Plan More city staff enforcement on j obsites Penalties for construction violations Implement Tree Ordinance G Regulate soil import /export for projects C Improve storm water management. standards — Surface & sub - surface water control - Infrastructure impact G No egress windows in side yard setback Rear yard access required via side yard Eliminate requirement for two car garage General recommendations C Review single Residential Zoning district For lots under city minimums, explore buildable area definition revisions — Increase side yard setback dimension(s) — Decrease maximum building height and modify means of determining height — Make lot coverage limits more consistent within city code Establish front- loaded garage standards (position relative to front -of- house) CityofEdina.com Surface Floor Area Ratio None SO% ( %vith some exceptions) Ow None None Edina vs. Surrounding City Z®nin C ®m ar1s®n��'- None Minimum Lot Ordinance 5,000 s.f (R -1A) 7,200 s.f. 6,000 & 8,000 s.f. 11,000 s.f. 9,000 s.f. 6,700 s.f. Size median lot sire of 6,0DO s.f. (R -1) Provision Edina Minneapolis St. Louis Park Hopkins Bloomineton Wayzata Richfield Height 30 feet (midpoirr 30 feet (midpoint 30 feet (midpoint 35 feet (midpoint 19-40 feet 30 feet 35 feet (midpoint of 5O feet Width of pitched roof) of pitched roof) of pitched roof) of pitched roof) depending on (midpoint of pitched roof) setback pitched roof) Front Setback Avg. front 25 feet 25-30 feet or 30 feet 30 feet or 20 feet 30 feet setback of homes closest wall to prevailing setback on either side street whichever of neighborhood greater 5-10 feet depending on tot 5 feet (R -1) 7 feet on one side 8 feet 10 feet (5 feet 10 feet 5 feet Side Setback width. Setback 6 feet (R -1A) and S feet on the detached garage) must be no matter the other (2 feet increased based height detached garage) on height 255E - lot over Building 9,000 s.f. SOS 3S% 35% None 30% 3S% Coverage 30?5 - lot under 9,000 s.f. Impervious None 6S% None None 3S% 3596 4S% Surface Floor Area Ratio None SO% ( %vith some exceptions) None None None None None Minimum Lot 9.000 s_f. (or 5,000 s.f (R -1A) 7,200 s.f. 6,000 & 8,000 s.f. 11,000 s.f. 9,000 s.f. 6,700 s.f. Size median lot sire of 6,0DO s.f. (R -1) neighborhood) Minimum lot 75 feet SO feet 60 feet SO & 60 feet 80 feet 60 feet 5O feet Width CityofEdina.com Sample Residential Zoning Plan .I ..SAMPLE SQ' LOT � -•- -•- ------------ ••- -•— �� --- -- -�-�� fJ, • Y.1UtfUWfip ra�rc ;i 1 ii.aoa '1 j I � I f I i i �Avem 6�1 ._.._.._.._.._.._. _. - -•• -- 1 -T SAMPLE 7s• LOT I � h i I t I " el 25' � • 30 t C ,I a a lane 1 I ISSUES /TOPICS :t. Lot width I b. Lot depth c. Setback —front d. Setback —side e. Tree f. Escape window I ig. Stormwater h. Garage i. Retaining wall I 1. j k. M. 1 11. CityofEdina.com NOTES FROM THE RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT FORUM SATURDAY, JANUARY 26, 2013 10 PM -12 PM EDINA SENIOR CENTER Facilitators: Mike Platteter. Ken Potts and Arlene Forrest' – Residential Redevelopment "working group" Staff in Attendance: Cary Teague. Kris—Aaker. Jackie Hoogenakker Others in Aftendarue: Council Member Swenson Mary Dick Lon & Nancy Oberpriller Molly Schomburg Ryan Weber Jen Colbu m Chris and Barb Hayhoe John Peterson Bill Rodgers Jeff and Jannie Johnson Kevin Staunton Ellen Berner Edward Glickman Council Member Bennett Bob Thompson Susan Wahman Liz Genorese Scott Smith Andrew Ramirez Nora Davis Bob Westdund Janey Westin Marlene Schlekner Pat Meyers Gene Persha Liz Genorese hfike Plat titer thanked everyone for attendipq the forum and inbaduoed Ken Potts and Amen* Fischer members of the Residential Redevelopment 11,Wk Group. Plateter opened the forum with a potnarr point presentation hight*Zng the goats of the 'working group . Ruatteler sordid during this sturdy of residential development and redevelopment their group found that the'issues seemed to fan wi*-A h%* areas: construction management and zoning (setbacks. massarg). Pule'er intrimed everyone to keep at mind the fol1mv+rg dates: January 31– 7-9 PM addre*W residential redevelopment pubbc forum at the Senior Center – sxne agenda as todays. P4- e1c.7 e Workshop op Notes . y January 31`– February I r – Summarize feedback period Februarynr Ir– present findings to the Plannng Commission hfarci 5 – PC and City Council will meet to discuss next steps uvih the next steps based upon Councl conmonts. Piaruw Teague addressed the group and briefly ex br*d zoning code issues. Attendee Comments during Presentation The following convnents owxred during the presentation by Pratteter and Teague: • Concern was expressed on increased segregation between the havehave nofs that app appears be occurring as the result of large houses being built in place of ler • More Idomration from htinnetonka on their setback and other standards needs to be added (on handout). • tforrilied by the Lack of respect buiders show to neighbors. • Design regulations? Design review inn a mote 5tmhutced process. A Mnnetonka resident suggested that a study be done on her the 'new house will ` l in – maybe side setbacts need to be readdressed. • A Fulton (htinneapobs) resident informed the group thei'neigltborhood associatiori established construction guidelines: however these guidelines are not enforce. • Construction management issues; monitor beater. • Impervious surfaces – reconsideR • Respect neighborhood character. • Suggest considering a Fkmr Area Ratio (FAR) per average in area: block? PLatteter explained the Forum Agenda' indicating the attendees would break irvo snutl groups to dscuss defining issues and regroup to dsauss proposed solutions. Each smM grate %=dd then report their issues and solutions to the entire group. Group One Issue: Ch35enge bu3ders to cane up with creative solutions – bigger not ahrays better. Solution: We need more refined regulations eMorced to preserve the rw#6odwW character and our mixed income oomnvmity. Issue: Respect neighborhood – new construction shosdd conkrm to character of the ne"VZorhood –AM.EN Solution: D3ferent zoning requirements for different neighborhoods to preserve seb3dL height mature trees. etc. Issue: Restria retaining wa"s in side yard setbadt. Psge 2 of 7 CityofEdina.com Solution: H & W Standards - Other ent zoning requirements far different neighborhoods to preserve setback. height, mature trees. etc. Issue: FAR has to be consistent with the average in the neighborhood. Solution: Dfferent zoning requ'mnvm% for d4erent neighborhoods topreserve setback, height maitre trees. etc. Issue: Require that drainage and runoff be retained on the lot being remodeled. Solution: Zoning regulabons for impervious surfaces — ocilect fines ff violates Issue: Garages can't be more than % of the front face of the new structure. Solution: Different zoning requirements for cKerent neighborhoods to preserve setback, height, mature trees. eta Issue: Rol back budding height to a more reasonable level so it is consistent with the neghbonng structures. Solution: Different zoning requirements for dsferent neighborhoods to preserve setae height mature trees. etc Issue: Regulate wtiem'storage or'outbukfangs can be placed on a lot so they aren t so dose (3') to the neighboring structures so as to block views. Issue: New restrictions for height and setback on garages. Group Two Issue: General zonskg. Solution: Design review cut evaluates proposed new construction design and that fit into the existing neghborhood. Smnate use of asphalt if possNe. Issue: Affordable housing. Solution: Preserve nixed income neighborhoods. Ne46orhood specific size- restrictions based on average saes rd homes adjacent to newconstruebon. For example not to exceed 20% of ends average square footage Group Three Issues: Base new construction size (square footage) on average home sine on same Nock (above ground square footage). Solution: Sizes war change over tine. Will keep some neighborhoods ►vys small homes wils no chance a dmrsgng Issues: Design review process to evaluate aesthetic. size and stories based on addxeent homeslneig ax hood. Solution: Some" like Minneapolis site pearl renew Page 3 a`7 Workshop Notes Issues: Better and stringent enforoernern o' violations to code and zoning. Solution: Better communicate processfrequirement to neighbors Issues: Zoning based an neighborhood versus one set of rules for the whole City. Solution: Redo zoning districts GmuR Feur Issues: Front loaded garage on 50-foot lot Solution: Love to see them barred, but at least prcWt from o=Wjing more than 50% Of front face. Issue: Side Setbacks. Is increasing setback as height increases vrorking? Solution: It isn t Issue: No driveway to bade takes away side setback Solution: Great idea Issue: Mass of homes/lot coverw Solution: Require that FAR be consistent w-h average at<neighborhood Issue: Placement of accessory structure (sheds) Solution: Requre larger setback and require neighborhood approval of sung storage or accessory structure. Issue: t l *d Solution: Rol back by 5 -feet at least Issue: Tres Solution: Require that Large trees be preserved — consistent wih character of the neighborhood, Issue: %'&sere does (drainage) go v t more W coverage? Solution: Require that drainage not be directed to neigltboring tots. Issue: Neighbors not apprised of building plans Solution: Require notification of neighbors Issue: Loss of privacy in backyards, sight lines eGo homes. Solution: Preserve better, setbacks eta Issue: Retaining waWegress windom too dose to w tine Solution: Through setbacks preserve access to the back yards. lqe J o`7 CityofEdina.com Group five Issue: Damaging neighborhood trees. Solution: Tree ordnance — require permits to remwie bees larger than 10 inches in dameter Issue: Losing affordable starter homes. Solution? Issue: Could not get exptaration for Why City required ed%mges to plans. Solution: Maten complaint requires written response of Cry. Issue: Nevi structure sharing neighbors back yard — killing gardens. Solution: Neighbors should be shown plans for new construction at least one morM p6or to work starting. Issue: Side yard setbacks not suncient — too small for sm,9 lots. Solution: Rewire minimum 18' total (Both sides combined) or require minimum SAM setback an one side. S4 on other Issue: Not enough room to access the back yard. Solution: require aoc ess on one side of house to backyard (min. -T) Issue: Ddferent in size of new hone W" compared to original home. Solution: Add design guidetnes around how new home fits with existing homes —See Park Ridge. U design gunddirkes. Issue: Drainage — does the City require drainage plants? How enforced. Solution: Must drain to public drainage (efreety) or mantasn on site. Committee members thanked everyone for tl*i input and reiterated the dates of the upcoming Rrx>rsx d� Redevelopmem Forum (January 31") indicating that meeting be Written Individual Comments: See below and attached to notes. Zoni Workshop Notes Regulate where storage or outbuildings can be located so they amn 't too clo neighboirna propety lines and bltuk v;E+vs • Smart zonng Laws are neighborhood specific • Base adjacent new construction on 'a►+erage' size of existing homes in the neighborhood • Have multiple zoning districts based on neighborhoods • Consider implementing a design m-*w process • Reconsider hard surfaoe Reconsider egress trndows — setback Drveway widths • Stricter limits an building height Restrict the size of garages and their location • On 50-foot lots have 5 fop setback on one side and on the other side 8 or 9 feet • ? - is inmeasig the setback by height really %roiling Construction MananemeM • Require that the builder should be required to bring newpbsnbing from the hone to the street and not stop at the setback. • Contractors should face fines if they do not pmpedy moCltor their subs and vendors i.e. blocking streets • Tines for consmaon needs to be revaluated 7 Aft is too early • City should monitor construction sites so residents don't haje to keep calling the City of Edina vvth complaints • Street constantly blocked by trucks and other vehides • Beier enforcement of violations prainaoe. Ennineerino • Better st urn water marWenhent on the site • Restrict height and where retaining %valls in are placed in the s5de yard setback • Ensure that drainage and runoff be retained on the lot being developed or redeveloped Aesthetics • Include FAR • Respect ardetecture of other homes • Preserve sightlines • Driveway Width • Take topog m raphy into mount . Light • Oferent more restrictive requirements for 50 -foot properties. Comm • DiFerert height limits on nar mr lots. Esta rht h'p Actreview of proposed new construction arid remodNing • New construction should fit into existing footprint Establish pr otectihre covenants • FAR has to be consistent by the average of the neighborhood • Roil back building heights to be more consistent with the neighboring Properties P,;e c of 7 Pip d o_'7 CityofEdina.com Miscellaneous Workshop Notes • Garages can't be more than J, of the font face of the new smxtwre • Front loading garages on Woot vide lots - if almwed coat't take up more than W* /. andlor garage r n st start behind the habitable area of the house • Require attached garage to be in back if tot less dtm 75 -feet in width • No short garages • Conoemed about'investW coming in and Wyy lg a property — tearing down the house and building a huge house that does not fs into the neighborhood and the price point is 2 to 3 tees that of the neighborhood • We of house should fit with the houses on the street— Memingside htas big time issues • Could there be a period of time that a house can be on the nvrket before an investce can buy up the property • 1 have no `3 th at the City that they twill do anything with the residents feedback Forum was adjourned at 12 Noon. Submitted by Potts. PiaRteter and Forrest are members of the Edina Planning Commission Poe 70: 7 CityofEdina.com NOTES FROM THE RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT FORUM THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2013 7 PM — 9 PM EDINA SENIOR CENTER Facilitators: Mike Platteter. Ken Potts and Arlene Forrest' — Residential Redevelopment "working group' Staff in Attendant• Cary Teague. Kris Aaker. Jackie Hoogenakker Others in Attendance: Council Member Swenson Mary Dick Lon and Nancy Oberpriller Liz Genotese Janet Ingram Ami Sharp rim Crain Antfi Otness Scott Smith Lori and Jim Gratz Kevin Staunton Carol Engstrom Council Member Bennett Bob Thompson Susan Wahman Janet Ingram Peter Kiftilea Peggy Lawrence Mike Pearson John Angela Felt Medweather Helen Burke Mr. Platteier welcomed everyone and introduced Ken Potts and Arlene Forrest members of the Edina Planning Commission and Residential Redevelopment'Workirg grip. Planner Teague briefly exo&,ed to the group the history of 'nuissing' and changes to the Code that vrere implemented in the Last few years to address it Mr. Potts and Ms. Forrest directed the group in an exercise of identEying issues and solutions to those issues. The group broke dawn into small groups to complete the exercise. Each group presented their findings_ Results areas follows: Group One: Issue: Pedestrian Access Solution: Enforcement of point 7 on handout Workshop Notes 7. The contractor shall veep the site, as streets. all sidewalks. boulevard areas and 34icent properties dean from was-. matenalS or reuse resultng from his operations on ve. Equipment not usable on the viork site shall be pmnVty removed and the she shall be rmuirittned in a neat and orderly condtien at of t es. AS empty cans paW. p6ast+c, etc. that is not needed for constructon shaA be removed and cleaned Sam the site every em ing pray to leaving the construction s:e. WY tem work an a project lies w %A arm of pedestrian access tr345c ands veht" We the project area tivfl be Leaned and swept and all materals related to the project will be stockpiled in appropriate areas_ No materials may be depo &ed or stockpiled on the pubic streets. boulevards or sidewalks, At the end of each waking day. the Contractor shall remove any soil taut washed or was deposited on any public sidetvalk or street and shad remove any trash or debris that washed or was deported on any public property. No dumpsters. portable toilets, buiding materials. or equipment may be scored on a public street swdew1k or boulevard area. Issue: Damage to existing property including. trees. uacks, streets. Solution: 1. Pre-construction soil testing and excavation plan pre- approved by City. 2. Set up escrow account equal to % o` total remodel Costs. Issue: Elevation of house. Solution: Apply limits relative to neighborhood average. just as is done currently for Iront yard setbacks. Issue: Drihage: Solution: Landscape architect sulmits dralruge prevention plan prior to construction. Plan can indudefaddress Iimhs due to topography. Issue: Amount of lot coverage for 50 -foot lots. No solution expressed. Issue: Egress wir>dows should not be allowed at lot fine. Solution: Addressed by setback requremenis in Code. No egress widows mowed at W line. GrouoTvro Issue: Neighbtxhoods overwhetmed by oonstruaion in day to day fires. Sdution: Enforce and improve Consmiction Maintenance Plan. Issue: Builders ( foxes) shouldn't be guarding our chickens. Solution: Require builders to stay win City Codes. Issue: Front loading garages are too big for the neighborhood (Momirgside). Solution: Give a pemeantage limiting garage'waT. Establish side yard setbacks of 5- feet and 8-`eet CityofEdina.com Issue: Who is valuing our neighborhood context No solution expressed. Issue: Loss of trees Solution: Create reasonable tree preservation ordnance. Be responsible to neighbor's trees that are located near the pmperybne. AS trees within 3-5-feet o` the property line should have measures implemented to protect them. Issue: Access Solution: Stagger setbacks - one side needs to be large for aocesv 5-feet on non- egress side and 8-feet on egress side. Issue: Sweets to match the existing grid. No solution expressed. Group Three' issue: Setbacks on small lots. Solution: Stagger setbacks 10-feet on one side 541eet on the other side. All access must ocar within setback- Issue: Storm water run -off Solution: AO storm water runoff must be dealI v&A on site or directed to the street Issue:. Tree ordinance Solution: live incentives for saving trees - tax break 'or number years. Requae tree peen t fee. Est"-" + certain s'uce tree cimmference to be saved or replaced. Pay attention to trees and their drip line and require location of trees on sur-mys., Ensure root safety so they areri t crushed. City enforce your ndes. Group Four: Issue: Shadowing — Light and space considerations and loss of trees Solution: The scale of new construction needs to be matched to the scale of the existing neighborhood. Zoning requirements should be tailored to each neighborhood. Issue: Dtariage issues — changes in topography and roof size and run -off No solution expressed. Issue: Vibrations during contraction causing structural damage to neighboring home. Solution: Construction Ma %Vemmt Plan enforcement — inspect homes adacern to new construction for meelmnicals. cosmetic. before demolition and construction and during consttvaion and Aer construction. Have builder establish escrow account or bond to cover damages if damages occur. Workshop Notes Group Five: Group five oonctrred with all issues and solutions. Please note the following written and verbal comments by category. Zoning Ordinance Changes: • Suggestion to'aharrge' the ordinance for lots less than 5d -feet in width. Leave the rest alone. • Can the onf toe do somethig about yards being shadowed by l hese overly large homes (setback inaeasej. (this could be bolding too i` as part of the pernit application a shadow, study is required) • Access to the rear yard needs to be provided on each lot Ordinance requirement{ ?) • Reconsider bolding height 1 how would amt measure a fat roof? • Are there requirements regarding outbuidings (sheds) in terms of setback, sue. height? • Side setbacks are too small for small lots. Not enough room. • Address egress window, with setbacks. • Change or dkunce for lots less than 9.00D square feet or tot width under 60 — feet • Need setbacks for sheds — 2 -story sheds too dose to neighbor blocks sunlight • Tree preservation ordnance. • Increase setbacks on 50 foot wxde lots. • Setbacks — homes should Gne up. Worm across the street was allowed to be built further back on the lot. Sweet looks better when homes Gne up as in the Country Club. not all over the place. • Tree preservation. conservation — restrict cutting down trees — pro!.ert trees an property line — replace tree if removed and protect heath of existing trees. • Implement rewards for coned building practices. F-MSOrce existing codes. • Are comer lots treated djfemrrtdy than lots in the middle of the block Are comer lot setbacks Oferent. • Consider a limit on height of fences installed on top of re taining vralls. • Setbacks for egress windows for lots 50-feet of less — the window well cannot impede neighbor's access to their ohm backyard ( ?) • Need setback requiements to address light and space impact on adjacent homes. • Suggest that a 'FAR' be set at no more than 2 -arses the existing house 'footprint' excluding garage avowed on the lot A FAR like this would lim`t the height of 'Monster' smed houses. • 60-Soot lots need diffe m specs than target lots. • City should follow rules in place. • Identify and define neighborhood character for each neighborhood. CityofEdina.com Engsteering • Instead of changina the ordinance consider the 'problem of overly large houses that znpact everyone in the Qty. not only Momingside (i.e. wa'--r runoff require that vrater runoff be directed to the street). • Require soil testing (this could also belong in the building permit area or consumton management) • also t ubry prt� result construction vehicles usirta road (This would • Water runoff from a3 sides must go to the street — this rust be enforced. • Sturn water drainage and enforcement by ehosUV ordnance. • Rainwater comes o5 the neighbor's roof acrd flows into cry yard. • En!broe water twof requirements— its currently not enforced. • A real concern for drastage problems — especia2y in South Hamel Park where lots are Mfeet wide. • Make sure water gram new house drains into the sheet. Construction Management Plan: • Vibrations from construction machinery — is the builder responstre for issues or damage to neighboring homes. • No response from the City after mmpL"t is registered. • Can hours of construction be re- renewed. • Should there be standards regarding vbraton during construction. • Geodtermal instal. • Have builders take so] samples to know possible impact on neighboring homes (thy could W under building pern ts.'engheering retriew) • Crewe defin;*e consequences for code volations for builders. We paid for our new streets about 4 -years ago. Now the new construction vehicles are destroying them. Is there any recowse? Redkeet the exhaust from construction equipment • Oacnage done to home next door due to new construction or from demolition, can the City require that the builder place monies in esaoor for repair to neighbor's property. Require proof of inspection (by the City) prier to construction, after demolition and alter construction. • Currently no aonsequeruoes when develiopers violate codes. • Requ'ae pre. oiling and post construction inspection • Hie more staff— too rtarty teardowns for current stag to keep up wide • There should be a parking Om for each new house bua'L I am constantly asking people to move the!r vehicles so t can get out of my driveway. • If a home owner inquires about construction issues — can City respond in writing to them, and not just send written notice to contractorfremodeler and owner. Workshop Notes . p • Require a damage deposit from developers. • Require soil testing for new construction. Aesthetics: • Front loaded garage WC that are greater than 30'. of the front facade are too much for our neighborhood. • No va5re to the context of the neighborhood when building new homes. Trees: • loss of trees — seems replacement pLuAings are often just shrubs and omarnentS trees. • Tree loss from construction occurs and on top of the Dutch elm and tee loss due to old ape — the majority of tees have life expectancy of 50 + years and many were planted 50 + years ago. • Builder promsed to build up 39 around ail the tees on the tot and he ended up tufting down ai four trees on the IoL He proceeded to bald a house that completely shades the sw! h side of my house. • Damage to neighbors trees. • Seen abuse of trees Mat are tea standing during construction: only to d`.e a slow death. • Can Edina create a tree ordnance. In South Harriet Park be%.een 541", — W Kellogg and oakLwm tees have been lost because of teardo►ms. ntiscenaneous: • Mat impact does major change in a neighborhood have on incentives for exis&q homeowners to ma:ntan their wteardovm' house? • How do we manage the dramatic scale d,!terenoes between new and existig homes to preserve the character a the neighborhood? • our interests aren't being protected. Idle trust w h the Cy - City seems to favor builders. • Re-review the construction noise loran. • Get professionals who wolf an the current home owners behalf not the builders M • Need peopte who are skilled in conflict resohrtion1faciitators. • Urban plxwfrq designers. • Snow slides cff the roof of the new house onto my steps of my side door on my property. • Are specula ors buying up properties before pmspeave buyers have a chance to buy into an affordable neighborhood. • Couid not get explanation for why City required changes to plans. • Issue of d'dWernce in size of new hone when compared to original home. • Losahg affordable suer hones to builders. CityofEdina.com • Ow is the historic square footage and lot size in Mornings de? • Neither side of the house is passable in the side yard with a lawmmower. • New house next door that exceeds lot area ratio never 3WNed for a variance. • Current home owners interest is not important to the City. They seem to coddle builders and they have fajorites. I am not convinced that building inspectors hdd builders to the Code. • Asking builders to help far the problem is Ike asking the fox to guard the hen house. • Can building razerais for re =crag walls be regulated to prevent premature bowv:mg or disrepair • Need teeth for code violations. • Education document— maintain'dw=teP = more home vaVe— Possibly in-. pence new construction wth economics. • Does Edna support existing homeoKowers wvth Iew cost remodel loans like St Louis Park does to upgrade exist' V homes. • Not want lenders Come home to Edina Program for first time homeowners.( ?) Platteter. Potts and Foment thmiked everyone ;tor their partiopaboo. The meeting was advoeuned at M PM Submitted by f. Workshop Notes CityofEdina.com IL , To: Edina City Courarand PbiWn Corrmt=on From:MornngsdeNeghborho d&wcobonS!ecMnZConrt"ee ( cd :nanamtipde EnrLeern) Re: comiru:.ion 14mmeaTient Pbn Date: February s.:oi j The A14MIngside neghboeh ood A::oaaton held a ndghborhood decussbn on te- _der4id reconstruction in Cietoaer :a 12. More than So reddents attended, raring a vanity of gimxons and concern: about the aapads of re Ner7ilrecon. reaiononKte�iSonngpropene Uewslt�ardrwA- 7he5teerngeenrrJreepre ? arcda summaryofthedl- .a. :d".whkhvlasd wtKtadtothenei borhooel. M.- nnigCommisdonacedCityCouncil Ln Hovenber. 1 he Steenng Cornmittee alto formed a utbearrrf tco to follow up on the octaber dl c=tan. The uibcomm- -.tee has famed is zetaftn on rdderyal :onirZ code arv! the Coy- tnection Aw.agew.cm Ptan ([.titp} Reconmendat:ons rcl=cd to residritial :onng code ate fortheamnE Belowwe recomnendatlorr. related to he CMP. The CIY.P f, a tool for conmurwatng to bu+lec: Of requtremeMs and exppectatiotis related to conmbwtion Peo eet: 1 he F :n eort airs acute: a<ma•datc, which bul6en mu-2 adhere to. The Foal itto Increase corrpl wme vrnth thre requutments and reducethe potentally aegis ve impact: of the carntruco3n prove :t on adjacent properle•A. sidewa5-- androadr. A range of concern „ere raised it Octat+er re}�ng the congtutian prover: erred Rs impart on ncpjrbors art! the wsder neirborhood. Thee concems and eepaM were wmmx9--ed L fotio%n: Issues during construction CondruMon me -NICIM bloddng access to trtveways or making R diff cul: for outer ve.Nkic to get through • 1, ex and tear an roaeway: from ceratrixtion veNcles and con"Aicton aewhim- • Wd< • Ca t=.,ru tloi wWtief wven d2X: a week Ydevv-Jks torn up ud;or not mintaircd In w rter • Nel&on not said %%+* they lhaad contact about gtuntians or campWnt%; some reported Coy staff a+4v bwlder not re:pon:ive to concerns Concern: about code v ah"joe. do--ag eonzetcticn and a pecm*cd lack of enforceme - were at:o rs.eo. as was a de*e for ad axe noyce of construction pcolects and mere d.-ccl communiaton with the oty. theCrtyhr talon ;rp:toaddre•. :merry oft l+ cecaxcrn�w? ich: mrotuntquetohtornirag•Jde.Orrmai :,he devei: pmenta- d Implementation oftheC 161P and the plan to hire additional =If totntuctcan truc•Jnn :rtes weely for axnpliance Arid to Irne�gate arvd nKpond to all ci�en eampbirts. As b Cie is w erJter o by what process tnditFdual tegumnents Ci the 4VP tan be enforced ReddeM: vrlit to know what the rtfmare . andtha thrywillbaeetl orced. they wt; okrowthero are ptrta fsGfor>•otat�ais that these penaklr we sulfides w deter urrwanted be-hw. err, and dt- the City vAl be proative. in preempting impair;: 1 he SteertngCommRtee offers ;he forowing recommend :9art: to hrprove the CMP and entouMes the Cclr to made ftrther refinernent of the CUP* kglt priorwy. Please comet tt::t the crna I:b we with art- queations. MNA CMP Notes RECOMMENDATIM t. Rnt:c, itreamtne and rcrnovc repetreon fion exi•Lrtg[rl.P. 2. Name document "COrmactor Rule: and Rep'tlatiost% 36 OrZ3ma by topic:; Parkin aid traffic: Refuse. trodor; Ou-t, std Soil Cantrat Note; tiatfiwtrarc cc. 4 if regidremer. is ;.aced in code. policy. ^.ztRe or rule, st-te the regLimzrers x ut zppc= to the onEjrnl dowment or u=nct)j streinar;e S. include code. poky. stawe or rule references- if not in [tAP body. then In addet+t%.an. 6. Add eriforcement staterrent. Caycote (tao.op) stows permit to he revoked or uuLs ended for acty viobtion of code that applea to the permit. State W!dire Code t joo.otxo, :tbpx ty. alkwvs -the bauiidlr>✓ of man! to suspend or revoke a bultlno, permit for cm v+danon afore once. regu=on, or butldkng code. l r_arcernertt procedure- and per: %ics for CMY rerrtltrement -• found in City code or state vatute can also be notm y. Add Cray telepho:+e number for anyone warai rig to make a coerptatn: or request enfew"M&nt 0. A tgncd CM P +: naw regmad to receive a brtiidng permit Add notkc of the requlremc n to the CMP ax to the Rddm:ial W;dng Perri: Subrr --tal Requirements Potty. Consideraddine the requitmment to City code. q. Ado rwsghbor notificatmn requresment.• to. City code allow. double pz!kjmZ far pickup and delvmy, up,* IS truntaes. State statute does r»t appear to a1owdoub1e parUAZ. C1:ir+fy. tf daubk pwWng is dlowod -add t9 mf%rta rCtrktiai to U!P (duo see Parlang Pbn blow). It. See t-'inrrcaaoisLzmU.q'CtrgrL.: tons Pttrnit."C onfideradopBrrE :knilarprocessinEd= ter. Add regutremene fora Parking Plali.— q. Add m-.M cftnonvjWowradicemuile per to4o .o,xtora.o9afWYCOdeifwplobte. 14. [ XP+: an+ nd�ectw3ytoeannunloteMUhsmdrepond :otheeoetecrn :oEnNgttbor greet commurtcs•Jon is rueded t haCity .io+rid dt+elop a commuriratan- putt to addr= I N% noea the ptan should Inekode mforrmaton :pecdicary&- eloped fer and distAbuted to reader &- g. If CfAP h Irttended to be a "!?aid" document, speofy p"Km,. by atkh ca,-4tlore inzy be aided to or dck;ed from cw. tb. Addresto :4erQJCdo: lit,( commn-- rd,- ,dL- ib-odyafC111Pbekyv. CityofEdinaxom -"bor notfflatlon c-I be awned out by eo etra.tororeity(dcpenfln£ on pore-., theCity waim Ike to use} Notice vwufd be pnnided in v6e5rg to at propene- w thin a act raetit.: rio Iscr than tree weeks before anyof the folle tie zet6-Je cannenec demottion. excavaSi act, Vniding or con —"n xti=of :u Cory addrlors or new homes. vmtttnnotcowaaddinrhrde :aeSdrr_ :of ubectpopety ranean0cor ..aetinfonratlonterWider —.4 and contact tafornatonfor&wner, bmUrg pant! or reference number, protected :art and completion dates: lnvitatbn to view pbn: on file at City I,W (phone nurnba forquesnans, budness hou rsl ant copy of or Irk to CA!P ond;or related "aids developed:peed4alty for neiohbo •• lane Usepbstntction permits (from 0611 nneapoas) Obstruction pernnas we new red wham any portion of a city street. paiang lane or sidewa3; I- obmucted for the purpose of construction.daroltom utility repar, etc. Reljst :lion and V prov:d is dane Online at l_.+e L=a,..,h = yen . t he"regl -r, :4 hour notice if Parmre meters need to be hooded. or 46 hours if streets nr is bt po•.ted for •trio varldmp,* Fees there Is no charge for the actual peradt, but the permit is ra:,ured to park vehicles Ir the ob.Knrctd area. Lam use fees may apply if a t-JM or par tins lane is closed Meter hooding fee appy if parsing meters need to be hooded for the project. h MJMww.mrmcaoon rsac rovfo feworkslbemlt.huS6e•works aw streeeu:.&aernhs ."Pal ww plan A p.TbAS plan should be rcq Avd for all rtsdde>ritta pro(ecufor which a CMP is regatee. The plan wodid Itm!t on. ,tree paditrg to ax 160 of the tree- for thedwften of the project and prohbit double parking and 1Ctnz of eonsuneetion vehicles. A copy of the parking pbn 1hod d be attached to the CMP. I he Police Dejam"ent is permitted to post terror -ry No Varidq oat: these :ones would be poled xcordn£ totho Plan. 1 he plan would take lrzto conode ration erect wtdth(tL runber of corn tvxtion prolocts on the :tact and in the hmrxdlate area, and potential need to post mti`dp,e stmt, to enure unobmuctd trnel thra gnu the MEbborhood. r 'w91�1r'� MNA CMP Notes °� e @3 may° A?MYSiS 1haCnYse> tst agCownructanMznagemeraFtn(CM.P) cc= in: aseresofaumdztesin nu, nb red p zomph tarn to aid dsor�on . this doc:unentnumber: each m. ndatefionutheGA pseparately.Coderefcscnces.=A penait m are provided to the bestof our ability when known t caffltrud$ onacmidcwilbe scheduled dufng the had .of7:00amtoy:oopmmodaytheoup'e FM.-T. and E:oo am to 7ato pm Saturday. Sunday and hoSda+i: per Section to4o os of the [ono City Code- (m code 1*40.)) Be:Un: work beElm an the site, a contractor tip must be installed ldens" the Contrader company name. a cant= rarne and phone number and the ttx address. (Aw in code) ,. the sip may nee exceed sbc (6) sgrare feet in a drplc -':ur ty rccidentt 7:orr'n£d :trkt and ehirry. !w® (y) souse "Irk Nh dersty redden43l eemmae3l or Indu heal areas (In code, 460.0)) S. Aoopyofthlsdoctimentmust: bobeattachedtotheop .lhe City can pr&ddeabmiratedcopy of thds doernent_ (hot in code) S. theContrsctorIsrespombler oerep_ erin ganydsnagetopubik :uactsoractacentprotxrditm (Cede does not apperr to dSaw d maSn sorts fu jo, :A] except if contractor has paints for work in the rtht of way (SW cm 4:rj. Are there ercumitanOC wt:ae it es ox to edenfige psrLlr s VeKs without* pamli'j G. The Contractor shall provbde pciures of the eU stint; conditian of the orb, sidewalk mid street, and any boulevard or border tree a4, cent to the property prior to crm=tr=1ors. (hot in code) 7. Klxndanu£ torusorifpmementIsdisiwted, Itmnctberepdredwit kin three (1)wcAtnL days, unless the Contractor hoc recelved weRen permission f. om city stiff to delay re par, to a later spedfbd date. (hot in code, except when convector has permit for work in the eight of way. to the- am repo& =hccue is stated in code) & Ihe Contractor IWCbUn written perml uonfwnthecitycr ;Vwertoblockanyroadways. duen£ any portion of the pro(ecs (Not ih code- howner, there it a roof c;=re persist amore. hat Is meant By "Mori" is nor dory. See Mnm:pofes &me obstruction pcmk ) q. t dna ordnance t400 .wpaffJJnyStoppu+ZandStandng te"sia`lapptyasfolbwr No person shat rap, stand or part; a veiide, excerpt when necessary to avoid corfict with e•.her traffic ortoco m .phance with the d:rertI*maidplacesof erertizInccontroldMe.lnanyofthe fo'lowtre places: a On a boulev n: between stdewac'i and roadway; b. wittan we feet of the Irrta sredon of any public a petvre dnieway or atey wet h any street or Nghw :y; a ra any place wticre the vehicle wiz block a fire rape or the exit from arty buldiV or d. In any phee where tenporarf1, spvhbbltparifngasfan g =the stets are fnplam (sectont400.Pcrkftvb&—ions cued b s: mgLj4 ere petty rrsdeirwrars under stare taw:) W. amt pastun t: aoowed on Loci Strers as long aa a mtnim:mt of a twelvefoot (ie) wide area k open for the trnered portion of die road, uviiew otturwse airhomed by the city ergtneer. (?lot a± CityolEdina.com rote. lany rft 6wt y s ree:caCow pa&OS an both parked an both ride of the stet the troveled portAon of the road can be nan owed to a sfriek rang dhus pro ++ :ton a7owz that, ' prorldedthe ntvdedparipart atia: turw+ detheGryefsoyamisdoubkparLyr };?arup ors rni•.utet. the cc, knwa ncc., abneor: og etha.a: nkcd: otn)Nkcdorp:rWilyobstructed.tree s -a rr+:.l+ wham for rrJGen :s. the 6ry shout! reeurea parkhg ptsn (ora7res:;ioua: t ronstnxtion p-o,letts for viNch a CMP Is reored. lie :a one side of the meet and p ohnd t double park ft cmdIeUnS a f canstrucffen vdmck -- . m Ongreet: Co" oraArterialkoadwsrs, avilrimumoftweny two feet (:27must beopenfor thetrweledpordonoEtlerosd. (Not encode SeecorrAwt cSave.) -2. the Contmttor iha!l ereourage off ::reef and of! ate par:sng to worter. an site. (NO: In code) rj. Ml mwsMa State t.- wregwGafvafoae($ Ip xkIrC %tbackfromdrveeray% and atNrtyfoW CSory :cttsack from Ir. :ercevan_ (cis sa%14. but Cot ctaso :ety smsei S cute atys p'back from beaoxn, stop n'z, or tar fk eontrot s!ge1 and :o' book tram cro ::wrA ct an A-teradi*n. - ov—xclk" is cacra rnx-ked uostwnf ror"that par. on of a roedwoyordneny Irwkded with the Pm6oriEaran a• mnmton of the latae laiet of Wewalks r. in:er%cC::k nt.° roq.34 does not rpeci fy :Piet )nu otnnotpark w:t is 5' from dive any. but does speck y tharyou ='t park -,h frmt pia pubiit orprivatee."% cy.- O: y code - peafGm pa" 5'fromd*cw.)s.m-,,*gma ricn:are petty mridemeanars u rd" swe raw.) -4. Mien pa WnZon a street, a vehdde mu= be completely located on the street surface. parallel to andwithintoincheso ! the curb.(^,t6g Perry mtdemwnot under stateAim) e.g the Contractor :tu'l keep the ate. an street:, as s'devralk;_ badLvanf seas and 4gant properte: dean from waste. ntxertalz ce refuse Modne from M opent4m on tse ate- (in Code 3ec5'an 425. Pm 4no5, to-Ts sett an Is Co for cee by the f tee neer, who can may ordain writing that e.9 wgrss and egress to the site be z:oj;,w0 utitil ermpliance with this scrien of code. Settl0n705.Pa yog.occumuPadanef refi:unotbs emmirersar tone- eratremavedper7ayo5is derareia mctrarta and enfexod by the Sanitarian.) -G. Equipment not usable on the work ate snail be promptly removed (In code: Section w4G) rP. andthe site -W beendn-2lnedIna neat andoreerllrcordt '.omatailtinm.(Vagum Maybe incode. depetCingon~. it mean:) 13. 19 anpty cart~ paper. ph,te, etc_ that t: not needed fcr con-tructon mall be remxved cad cleaned from the dic eery eventne prior to Sming the cams ruirwri cite. (M rode Section 425; sce9'at �� :q. Ntxre work on anyproreet Cos wkkn are :- of pcde•7isi tra!$t ardlor vehl4itut7 trafAc the protect aresurtll be c]eanM and swop: and ai rnatahJ: reh;ed to the pnajett will be :toetpl(ed In approprltte axis (tn cadet lemon 425) :o. %-a rnatenals may be depowted or stockpiled on the pubte.stree;s. boulevards or sidew -'1s (in code Settdan >,ar) w9t�11A °� e �0 MNA CMP Notes H� � _ y 21. A: the end aE each were irgday, the Cortrmtor chaB rrnwe arty• mil Liat washed or N^; depoi -.ed on arty pub8c adearalk or crmt and zha :i reneve any trash or debts that washed or was dept_ :-ed on any public property. (en code•Sectlan4:5) u tvo dump =as, paeaS:e takts bufldirg natedac, or equ¢mer+2 Rfay be �dstrd On a prDL::.�ees, =dew.-1k, or ba:kvatd area. (!n cafC Section i. cc) a} I'mlieneofdn onto pubic road: duinghatdinS mid Meni day today cori trueionoperators anti rc4ure penod:e etrrtneof these ra:dways (W t h: tote. StKidon ,125 toys:, es chat Is be loaned V,* hutmay roe °Pmt Y•i :4. Scra;nlrGandvacrarna:: steel: weepcneoraoombinitlonrr .:ylxrequhred.(NO :s,aitedincode) :S. Power brom- or--Jdcwwrdesr type devices are not accepmb3e for ekzrtre oft heroadway. (Not tpeciJw nn code.) :6. Artys eilment:- achedontoCPrystreetsocs�dewalkz .or onto :tree :thatdataintottormuwa :yvems shall be kept clean by the Contactor. (m code Section 425) rl. %edlmcntshs7berrmaedwtttJnr2 °+our:ofdl , eoray. (Sc6cn4i5:ay:rtwriibeckanedupbr the end a f the workirL day on:he dylt occurred or was discovered. Engineer can step J aWets kV,ets :o/from the site until :: Is encored up) sg. If the Contractor fah to remove all of the tracked sedment from -tree.: the City loll remove any sediment at thetonvadoe: expense. (Not sure - -this is not tpeafied In SeeWn 425) 29. the ne wM have proper erosion and sod- -nem control and veil be adequately maintained on z cantnual bas; to cart:ln onste e•estw%xid protect an :rd oft .;e veeetntor :;%zhown on City approved crosloe control p:.rn~(Section 83a. farcedvit es rc{udnng exravadenevgradngpermlL Work must becompktedaccardtg to pem.it. ti-- Jywlicha other ru!cs appya•+d to wh.ch loads of prAWtL Sirvcy,'VcPlan poky requnres that survew . show °pC:cemeitcndrnethotof ao -Jan control. inaidpg construction entrcnce tarcdon1 90. Conr..ctor mta: protect a? :torrn G- ainln'.ets ►mh sedkttesn capture dcvicrpror to ;dl a:surhriltg activities that may rc-- dt in sed'-Iaent laden =arm wsta ruciff entering the inteL (Sectlan SP. es abcn%) ;t. the Comtrattor -hall prewde eftwive =orm drffn Irlct protection aver the Ilfe of the Project until all trafaces with potemid for discharging sedimentto an intes hove been ztablL ^ed.(Section silo, as above) . yes The Cimtactori trespon- -ble for preventngorrunbr• tng the potentlal for mt=fecadltlom. floodine.orahatonproblesns ( Sectonglo, r above Not su rcifothertectlan,q*y.) SS For examp't devices mint be re,- ;uLiry cleaned out and m:asancy overflow must be an in -cV:d pet ofthe devke to reducethe fhoodnZ poter. l3l. and dcvi:c mtct be ptxed axh that dnvirg CityofEdina.com 'MNA CMP Notes hr rdsarob�ru:darawe not created. {Not sure. a$ oatbN r .;aotbeprow:'on:ocorptabletothe b+`2bVoff WQ % The Contrsctor:F_1lclean. remove sdenent, or reptace storm draininle protect`ondevoct on a routine bates such that the deom are My functional for the text ra nstorm event (No: sate a!o allows for other provisl nsacceptaNetothebuddh3offidal.) ,y. Removsl and dhposaloftr.Aped team r? Irh We: protectionde w(ce::ls:ObeImWaTsattothe Project (Not sure. sjoal lows for other provisions cocep :abkto the bmidigrojfk E) 36. Sedt nentdepad: edInandtorp lur,Crt3drair-,%c systems is the re otrab1yoftheContractora+d shall be removed a: no expense to the Department (Nee sue. Sloetiows for other prodslans acceptable to the bud" official) 37. the Contractor and as u6coctrxtors w_11 Imuil and rnmrawn - rack cn:ranee pad or i:: equvalent or s4nitar sutfxe ; at euh lomtor+ where vdYeks enter oretdt farm the constn=an s:e. r. shown on the approved ;tan (Su rvcy,,S?cP4anpoiky requ.*cs thot the survey show °pite[mNit endmCloodaf ero%ton owirat inewos em"ructbn t:ntraneelaea:lan. ") 0. AD debts W-3 be contained on the project site. (in Dote. Sr.Gen 4:4) !9• A re�.rlsly sehed�cd tryh romewal setvko shall be Nrcd to rcmave thl: Gems (in code: Scctbn ,aS. but It ragtcrc weekly pdwpand covered cor..ahiers) qo. Btlkir>3 rna:eriats vall be ddvered to the zi:e withln the %orkin hat S:tcd In tl ahave, on:n x. needed N=z- tlra 4eep 1ng 1vV rna:enal •tockp+3f located on the ute to a re:.nrnurr (.W t M each S•.oekples eh:: eou4i h7bayatttaeepests eouAf lot decL--do tmrkanoe. mforcedbq Stntanan.) 4L sus: control ft the respor&bitty of the art-=e Contract -w. (eht sure.) 4z The Co:rtractw :1► II be required to re--pond to wry verbal notue. fran the City n3rding dust control arld Mpond appropnatelywthna+e (i) hour from:thetrne of mdllcat4m (no! tune.) 43 No basil ng mater-at peeto pottl , ere dumpsta nay be Abed avthin stress nght of way. (in cede Section esoo. Derr: aao�orrfob: trtse�onorenevrrruraregasde • <rnDedin:asio+serooa!oodgis de—rod a mWAism Gtyprovides seven daps wntran noticean l �,Inufsarcc is not ab- -celthe Ciy can aba :e Rand Charge propertyowsur.) 44 Pubic ;1dew*! : rnust be k4 openand woobetruad. (en cai eL Swdon tieo) 43. +uttem prxtiot protective fCWn shyt Intt led around 0 botfevxd tree and or roes along lot hV. that arc ir.:cndd to be sent. (riotsum) CityofEdina.com