Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-03-19_COUNCIL MEETINGr AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MARCH 19, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of March 5, 2013 and Work Session of March 5, 2013 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 01/10/13 , TOTAL $1,077,585.99; and Pre - List Dated, 01/17/2013, TOTAL $974,620.95 C. Request For Purchase — 2013 PV5 Grand Caravan — Communications & Technology Services Department D. Request For Purchase — Purchase Of Evidentiary Recording System And Server — Police Department E. Award Of Bid — Contract ENG 13 -1 Mendelssohn A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstructions F. Award of Bid — Contract ENG 13 -9 Raw Water Line On Vernon Avenue G. Traffic Safety Report of February 6, 2013 H. Memorandum Of Understanding To Retain Professional Services With The Joint Waters Commission V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Edina's "Open To Business" Program Presentation, Ron Smolund, Metropolitan Consortium Of Community Developers VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS Agenda/Edina City Council March 19, 2013 Page 2 During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3 to PUD, Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat, Lund Food Holdings, 7171 France Avnue, Resolution No. 2013-31 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Golf Dome Settlement & Bid Awards B. Ordinance No. 2013 -3 Amending Chapter 4 Concerning Demolition Permits For Single And Double Dwelling Units C. Resolution No. 2013 -28 Accepting Various Donations D. Traffic Safety Report of January 2, 2013 E. Resolution No. 2013 -29 Requesting Variance From Standards For State Aid Operation — Wooddale Avenue F. Resolution No. 2013 -30 In Support Of A Metropolitan Area Dedicated Transit Sales Tax G. Consider Revision To Approved Plans For Southdale Apartments IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Park Board, February 12, 2013 Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues T, ies !s wion Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda /Edina City Council March 19, 2013 Page 3 2. Heritage Preservation Board, February 12, 2013 3. Planning Commission, February 27, 2013 4. Human Rights & Relations Commission, January 22, 2013 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA -Regular Meeting of February 5, 2013 III. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -04 Finding That Parcel Is Occupied By A Structurally Substandard Building, (Favorable Vote Of Majority Of Commissioners Present To Approve) IV. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Mar 19 Work Session - Residential Redevelopment Management 4:30 P.M. Plan Ordinance Mar 19 Work Session —Jnt Mtng Health Committee /Future do.town 5:30 P.M. Mar 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Apr 2 Work Session — Business Meeting/Neighborhood Assn.Policy 5:30 P.M. Apr 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. Apr 16 Work Session — Grandview Next Steps 5:30 P.M. Pentagon Park Sketch Plan Apr 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. May 7 Work Session —Joint Mtng with HRRC 5:30 P.M. May 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. May 21 Work Session — Budget 5:30 P.M. May 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. May 27 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jun 4 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. Jun 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jun 18 Work Session —Jnt Mtng with EEC 5:30 P.M. Jun 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 5, 2013 5:07 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:07 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague entered the meeting at 5:14 p.m. Edina Planning Commissioners attending were: Jeffrey Carpenter, Arlene Forrest, Michael Platteter, Ken Potts, Nancy Nyrop Scherer, Michael Schroeder, and Chair, Kevin Staunton. Edina City Staff attending the meeting were: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering; Steve Kirchman, Chief Building Official; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Scott Neal, City Manager; Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief; Cary Teague, Director of Community Development; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to receive an update on Residential Redevelopment with the Planning Commission Residential Working Group. Commissioners Platteter, Potts, and Forrest made a presentation outlining the goals of the Working Group. Issues identified by the Working Group were in the categories of home size, home setbacks, home heights, front garages, storm water /grading, tree canopy, and new /remodel home construction. The Planning Commission, City Staff, and City Council members discussed the specific recommendations given by the Working Group fe+ including enhancement of the Construction Management Plan, City Staff enforcement on jobsites, penalties for construction violations, a tree ordinance, improvement of storm water management standards, no egress windows in side yard setback, rear access required via side yard and elimination of requirement for two car - garages. They also discussed Working Group's general recommendations for revisions in buildable area definitions for lots under city minimums, including increase in side yard setbacks, decrease in maximum building height and modification of the method of determining height, making lot coverage limits more consistent, and establishing standards for front - loading garages. The Mayor thanked the Planning Commission and specifically the Planning Commission Residential Working Group for their hard work. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 19, 2013. Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor if MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 5, 2013 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of February 19, 2013 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated February 21, 2013, and consisting of 24 pages; General Fund $403,490.14; CDBG Fund $68,575.00; Police Special Revenue $206.46; Working Capital Fund $17,455.65; Equipment Replacement Fund $179,706.68; Art Center Fund $1,686.38; Aquatic Center Fund $45.96; Golf Course Fund $22,419.43; Ice Arena Fund $28,874.50; Edinborough Park Fund $19,112.41; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $17,198.60; Liquor Fund $177,571.61; Utility Fund $253,195.80; Recycling Fund $34,862.58; Centennial TIF District $3,697.62; Grandview TIF District $500.00; Payroll Fund $2,106.25; TOTAL $1,230,715.07 and for approval of payment of claims dated February 28, 2013, and consisting of 25 pages; General Fund $129,105.88; Working Capital Fund $70,865.54; Equipment Replacement Fund $3,812.11; Art Center Fund $4,975.54; Golf Dome Fund $92.52; Aquatic Center Fund $70.52; Golf Course Fund $16,240.36; Ice Arena Fund $6,815.26; Edinborough Park Fund $2,801.95; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,851.50; Liquor Fund $179,936.49; Utility Fund $10,177.84; Storm Sewer Fund $246.79; PSTF Agency Fund $17,406.27; Centennial TIF District $825.00; TOTAL $445,223.57; and, Credit Card Transactions dated December 27, 2012 — January 26, 2013; TOTAL $23,421.84. IV.C. Approve On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -Sale, and Sunday Sale, Wine and Beer Liquor License Renewals IV.D. Approve Park & Recreation Turf Management Plan IV.E. Request for Purchase, Contract ENG 13 -2, Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Northwest Asphalt, Inc. at $1,738,562.34. IV.F. Request for Purchase, Contract ENG 13 -3, Braemar Hills B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Northwest Asphalt at $944,807.33. IV.G. Request for Purchase, Contract ENG 13 -4 Lake Edina Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Palda & Sons, Inc. at $3,158,445.82. IV.H. Approve Consultant Engineering Construction Phase Services — Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction IV.I. Approve request to waive building permit fee for Countryside Park Renovation Project IV.J. Waive Second Reading Adopting Ordinance No. 2013 -02 amending Section 1501 of Edina City Code Rollcall: Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 5, 2013 w Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. I V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. FRANCE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENT PROJECT— UPDATE PROVIDED Engineer Houle provided an update on the France Avenue Pedestrian Enhancement Project that was scheduled for construction from June to September of 2013. Mr. Houle answered questions of the Council related to right of way acquisition, ongoing work on urban design, and tying in to the existing bike infrastructure. Vl. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH VARIANCES, RODNEY HELM ON BEHALF OF MIRIAM KISER, 5633 TRACY AVENUE —RESOLUTION NO. 2013-26 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Rodney Helm, on behalf of Miriam Kiser, to subdivide the property at 5633 Tracy Avenue into two lots. The existing home would be torn down and two new homes built on the new lots. To accommodate this request, a Preliminary Plat and Lot Width Variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot would be required. Mr. Teague indicated in this neighborhood, median lot area was 12,090 square feet, median lot depth was 136 feet, and median lot width was 85 feet. The new lots would meet the median area and depth but would be just short of the median width. Mr. Teague stated both staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval as the findings for variance approval had been met. The Council asked questions of Mr. Teague relating to accommodation of storm water drainage, which would be addressed at the time of permit application. With regard to practical difficulty being tied to lot size, Mr. Teague noted if denied, this property owner would be denied a use that every other lot, including the lot to the east that was previously subdivided, had been granted. Proponent Presentation Miriam Kiser, proponent, stated she had lived at 5633 Tracy Avenue for 60 years. Rodney Helm, Burnet Realty and listing agent for Ms. Kiser, indicated staff had well summarized the request and neighbors had provided only positive responses. He noted the new lots would meet 155% of the median square footage and 171% of the median length. The Council encouraged Ms. Kiser to contact staff so an interview with the Historical Society could be scheduled to preserve the history of this property and the Kisers' original mid - century modern home. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -26, approving a Preliminary Plat with Lot Width Variances at 5633 Tracy Avenue based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot area and depth, and nearly meet the median width. Page 2 0 Minutes /Edina City Council /March S. 2013 3. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block of Tracy Avenue. 4. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. S. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. c. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of this property, an 80 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year. of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the District's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Tracy Avenue e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the City Engineer. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -25 ADOPTED —APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF OBLIGATIONS BY THE CITY OF LILYDALE, MINNESOTA TO FINANCE A PROJECT BY CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF MINNEAPOLIS Finance Director Presentation Finance Director Wallin indicated that in 2008, Calvin Christian School had requested the City issue tax exempt bonding to fund a project; however, that proposal was turned down. As a result, the School obtained taxable funding and was now requesting a public hearing to convert that taxable debt into tax - exempt conduit bank qualified debt issued by the City of Lilydale. It was noted the City of Edina would have no responsibility for the debt being proposed, if approved, and the purpose of the public hearing was to provide opportunity for residents to testify. Those comments would then be forwarded to the City of Lilydale. Proponent Presentation Steve Fenlon, 2042 Charlton Ridge, West St. Paul, Midwest Healthcare Capital and the Calvin Christian School's consultant, indicated if approved, the bond would be issued through the City of Lilydale to have access to bank qualification. A commercial bank would be the lender. The project scope was a building addition including a media center /library, computer lab, conference room, administrative office with health station, improvement to the front entry, a sprinkler system, extensive landscaping, and hallway with restrooms. That project cost was $2.5 million with $1.5 million financed through a taxable note. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /March S. 2013 1P Randy Kroll, Calvin Christian School Principal, presented the history of Calvin Christian School, demographics of its students, and described services /benefits brought to Edina through its outreach efforts. He indicated that the Edina campus had 30 employees who, along with 200 students, patronized Edina businesses. Mr. Kroll reported on new outreach initiatives that were underway to connect with and provide service to the neighborhood. With regard to the impact resulting from the use of tax - exempt financing versus commercial financing, it would reduce the annual debt service by $30,000 and over the term save at least $600,000. That savings would be of benefit to lower costs to families, equip each student in two classrooms with one -on -one technology, provide financial aid to at least eight students, or employ an additional paraprofessional to assist challenged students. Philip Colton, attorney with Winthrop and Weinstine representing Calvin Christian School, addressed the issue of separation of church and State. He stated case law was absolutely clear that using revenue bond /conduit financing for religious organizations was appropriate. He cited several cases before the United States Supreme Court and Minnesota Supreme Court where it had been found that tax exempt /conduit financing for this type of institution was appropriate. Mr. Colton pointed out that in this case, it was known that public money would not be used for this financing as a commercial bank would refinance the bond issue. In addition, the improvements made were not related to religious purposes. Mr. Colton opined if the Council withheld a general benefit because the recipient might be religiously affiliated, it would violate the Constitution. As an Edina resident, he asked how the Council could object to the use of a City of Lilydale backed bond issue and use of private money to refinance bonds that improved an Edina school which had been in its jurisdiction for over 50 years. Mr. Colton responded to the Council's questions related to the court's determination and indicated the court had found there was no use of public monies as it was bank financed bonds. In addition, in this case, the City of Lilydale would issue the bonds. In terms of the Statute, it contained a provision asking the local unit make a finding to support the general welfare provisions outlined in the preamble. Mr. Colton noted the bonds were used to improve a school within the district, provide education of students within the district who attended the school, and also improve property within the City's jurisdiction. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. Public Testimony John Heer, 4222 Scott Terrace, addressed the Council to oppose the request. Carolyn Jackson, 5716 Continental Drive, addressed the Council to oppose the request. Robert Stewart, 6147 Arctic Way, addressed the Council in support of the request. James Hay, 7634 Kimberly Lane, Eden Prairie, addressed the Council in support of the request. John Healey, 4808 Upper Terrace, addressed the Council in support of the request. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Manager Neal indicated the nature of the decision was allowable, yet discretionary. Attorney Mattick confirmed the decision was discretionary and stated if the Council decided to say no, it would need to briefly state a rationale for denial. Continuing, Mr. Mattick said his firm was not the City's bond counsel so he had not reviewed the documentation and could not offer a legal opinion. Page 4 r Minutes /Edina City Council /March S. 2013 Mr. Wallin advised that the resolution under consideration had been provided to Dorsey Whitney, the City's bond counsel, DGFse • Whitoey. Whit Jerry Gilligan, Dorsey Whitney, indicated he saw no issue of concern with the resolution. Member Bennett noted there was no written opinion before the Council from either the City's bond counsel or from the City Attorney. Mr. Neal stated the only thing not "ordinary" about Calvin Christian School's request was the fact that a public hearing was required to be held in Edina; while another city would be issuing the conduit financing. He reiterated that granting the request was at the discretion of the Council. Mr. Colton commented on the 1984 Rostenkowski statement paper relating to issuance of bank - qualified tax - exempt bonds and ability to access unused issuance capacity of municipalities, subject to public hearing by the municipality with jurisdiction over the site. With regard to the Statute 469.15452 requirement that a governing body finds the project furthers the purpose of prevention of "occurrence of conditions requiring redevelopment, or aid in the redevelopment of existing areas of blight, marginal land or avoidance of substantial and persistent unemployment to -fiRd eFal benefit. Mr. Mattick stated advised -the improvement had already been made so that general benefit could be found. Relating to the public testimony indicating the $30,000 savings to the school would directly result in a $30,000 loss to the taxing system, Mr. Wallin stated he was not sure there was a direct correlation between the two as it was dependent on the banking system and amount of debt. Attorney Mattick agreed with the proponent's comment that this consideration had been often made. Mr. Mattick stated he was not aware of any cases being challenged and overturned. Next, Mayor Hovland asked Mr. Mattick if the Supreme Court cases had involved higher education institutions, as pointed out by Carolyn Jackson. Mr. Mattick confirmed that was the case, but that actual issuance in Minnesota had been made to high schools. The Council discussed the request and asked questions of staff. Member Swenson indicated Calvin Christian School was a great school; however, she had not supported the 2008 request and her position had not changed. She noted the school teaches creationism versus evolution, which in her mind crossed the line for separation of church and state. Member Bennett indicated, consistent with her decision epieiea in 2008, she would vote against the request. She supported use of public resources to support public entities /goals and that had been the City's use of conduit funding in the past. She agreed with Member Swenson, noting that Calvin Christian School's own materials described the school as providing "Christian education that does not divide life into secular and sacred parts." Members Sprague and Brindle voiced support for the request as it met the statutory and constitutional test, resulted in general benefit to the community, and secular use of funds. Mayor Hovland indicated he would reverse his 2008 position against as the proponent had presented additional information to meet the constitutional test by proving a secular purpose that would not violate separation of church and state. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -25, approving the issuance of obligations by the City of Lilydale, Minnesota, to finance a project by Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Nays: Bennett, Swenson Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS —CONFIRMED Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /March S. 2013 Mayor Hovland presented the slate of appointments. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, confirming the,following appointments with three year terms ending February 1, 2016 unless noted differently: Edina Art Center Board — Kandace Ellis partial term ending 2/1/2015 and Paul Peterson; Community Health Committee — Melinda Bothun - Hurley partial term ending 2/1/2014, Nadia Martyn ,partial term ending 2/1/2015, Alison Pence partial term ending 2/1/2014, and Joel Stegner; Construction Board of Appeals — Michael Birdman partial term ending 2/1/2014, Tim Cross, Kip Peterson partial term ending 2/1/2014, and Susan Lee partial term ending 2/1/2015; Energy & Environment Commission — John Howard; Heritage Preservation Board — Tracy Holtan, Connie McDermott, Tim O'Brien, and Ryan Weber, Human Rights & Relations Commission — Laura Davis partial term ending 2/1/2015 and Leslie Lagerstrom partial term ending 2/1/2014; Planning Commission — Claudia Carr; Transportation Commission — Dawn Spanhake; and Park Board — Joseph Hulbert — reappointed to partial term ending 2/1/14. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -27 ADOPTED — SUPPORTING LEGISLATION FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS Engineer Houle presented the draft resolution supporting legislation that had been introduced into the House and Senate that would allow cities to establish street improvement districts. He answered questions of the Council and indicated if adopted; it would provide latitude to create a funding mechanism to pay for road projects, potentially reducing assessments currently paid by property owners. It was noted the terms for a "district" would need to be defined. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -27, supporting legislation for Street Improvement District. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. PETITION CIRCULATED BY EMILY BOETTGE REQUESTING SIDEWALK —RECEIVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, receiving the petition circulated by Emily Boettge requesting sidewalks for the Cornelia Elementary School Public School Zone /Walking Shed and referring the petition to Engineering. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council expressed its appreciation to Ms. Boettge and residents for their work to bring forward this matter. IX. B. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IV.C. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMUNICATION — URBAN FORESTS TASK FORCE — REINSTATED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the request of the Energy & Environment Commission to reinstate the Urban Forest Task Force to the 2013 EEC Work Plan. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX.D. MINUTES: Page 6 a - Minutes /Edina City Council /March S. 2013 1. PLANNING COMMISSION, FEBRUARY 21, 2013 2. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, DECEMBER 13, 2012 AND JANUARY 10, 2013 3. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, JANUARY 8, 2013 4. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, JANUARY 17, 2013 Informational; no action required. IX.E. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNICATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS — RECEIVED The Council acknowledged receipt of the Edina Transportation Commission Communication Committee recommendations related to development of a Comprehensive Communication Plan and referred it to staff for prioritization. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Xl. WOODDALE CENTERLINE VARIANCE REQUEST —DISCUSSED The Council discussed whether to request a variance from MnDOT for the Wooddale centerline to address traffic safety and asked staff to schedule this topic for a workshop discussion. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, directing staff to bring forward a report that would give an update of the Federal Highways Experiment that provides traffic data and also options to create a safer feeling roadway such as create bump out areas and a resolution to request a variance from MnDOT to place a centerline along Wooddale Ave between 50`h St and Valley View Rd. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received Xll. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 19, 2013. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the March 5, 2013, meeting available. Page 7 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 302013 7:40:11 Council Check Register Page - 1 3/1/2013 - 3!7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368941 31112.013 100613 AAA .. 5,517.09 TRUCK PLATES 309503 022713 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,517.09 368942 31112013 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 3,000.00 ,- BACKGROUND CHECKS 309541 PRE -PAY 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3;000.00 368943 .. 31712013 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 179.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 309504 021037292 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS, EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 179.00 368944 3/712013 7. 100613 AAA - - - 1450 VEHICLE.PLATES 309722. 030113 1553.6260 LICENSES &PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 14.50 368945 3/712013 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 585.39 - UB TEMP 309306 37377186 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 585.39 368946 31712013. 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY. 35.60 309653 1658204 5842.5515 COST OF,GOODS'SOLD MIX - YORK SELLING 36.40 309681 1658199 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 72.00 368947 31712013 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 28.00 DRAIN TREATMENT 309435 781582, 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 28.00 368948. 31712013 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 433.45 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 309723 118917 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 433.45 368949 31712013 102715- ALLEGRA EDINA 190.97 FORM PRINTING 309505 97250 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ah' - 190.97 - 368950 31712013 .105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 234.10 COFFEE 309483 156442 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 234.10 368951 31712013 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2013 - 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 197.40 HOSE 00005046 309307 AFS- 230510009 1553.6530 197.40 368952 31712013 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 113.19 PAPER 309368 10352524 -00 5822.6512 113.19 PAPER 309368 10352524 -00 5862.6512 150.90 PAPER 309368 10352524 -00 5842.6512 377.28 368953 3M2013 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 587.63 CONCESSION PRODUCT 309506 1856975 5730.5510 976.41 309507 1881508 5730.5510 399.03 309508 1879240 5730.5510 700.86 309509 1885243 5730.5510 21.75- 309510 1843255 5730.5510 89.00 CHEESE CUPS 00002312 309604 1888389 5761.5510 2,731.18 368964 31712013 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 398.11 COFFEE 309605 1058546 1550.6406 398.11 368955 31712013 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 504.15 PLOW, FLAP 00005006 309308 10112544 1553.6530 459.35 PLOW 00005006 309309 10112802 1553.6530 432.60- RETURN 00005006 309310 10112803 1553.6530 530.90 368956 31712013 117353 BASSFORD REMELE 3,138.50 LITIGATION 309369 157220 1195.6131 3,138.50 368957 31712013 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG 92.94 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309724 022813 5510.6107 92.94 368958 31712013 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 3,162.57 RINK GLASS 00008068 309311 00093115 5521.6406 3,162.57 368959 3/7/2013 105490 BELAIR SITEWORK SERVICES 118,182.90 PAYMENT NO. 1 (FINAL) 309476 030813 01243.1705.30 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page- 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERV -LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS A -243 BRAEMAR SPORTS DOME CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/112013 - 3/712013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 118,182.90 368960 31712013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 221.31 309414 77091200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 102.50 309452 77091000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,417.05 309654 77168600 SB62.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 133.32 309682 88067000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 212.03 309683 6291500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,755.35 309684 77168300. 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 57.05 309685 77168500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 64.64 309686 88066900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,963.25 368961 31712013 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,104.00 SNOW REMOVAL 309725 140658 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,104.00 368962 31712013 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 69.55 ART WORK SOLD 309580 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 69.55 368963 317/2013 125139 BERNICK'S 165.55 309687 45416 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 264.05 309688 46356 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 429.60 368964 31712013 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 364.50 COFFEE 309312 1072790 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 299.00 COFFEE 309313 1074685 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 663.50 368965 31712013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 51.45 SUPPLIES 00003152 309314 WO- 832270 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 71.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003154 309444 WO- 833331 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 153.68 INK CARTRIDGES 00003154 309444 WO- 833331 -1 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 12.81 CALCULATOR 00009240 309606 OE- 310837 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 15.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009240 309607 OE- 310745 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 37.58 PENS 309608 WO- 834098 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 43.62 WRITING PADS 309609 WO- 834027 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 386.45 368966 3/7/2013 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2013 - 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,206.00 309542 LOG10 -S3 6 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page- 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 05535.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PW BRAEMAR SITE LEAD ABATEMENT 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 5440.5511 1,206.00 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 368967 31712013 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC . 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 49.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003589 309484 81011035 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 28.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003589 309485 81011036 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,896.58 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES. 00003589 309486 81012271 - 1,973.68 368968 31712013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 21.83 WATER SENSOR 00005017 309315 717791 21.83 368969 3R12013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 2,226.75 RAP IMPLEMENTATION 309543 365853 2,226.75 368970 31712013 104166 BREVIG, PHYLLIS 68.00 SENIOR TRIP REFUND 309487 022513 68.00 368971 31712013 103995 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 120.25 ARTWORK SOLD 309581 022613 120.25 368972 31712013 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 772.71 NEWSLETTER 00008283 309488 30429 772.71 368973 31712013 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 831.60- REBATE 309511 924066610 2,769.00- CREDIT 309512 924072854 786.45 SUNGLASSES 309513 924113616 12.74 SHIPPING CHARGE 309514 924113626 1,411.20 MERCHANDISE 309515 924116884 878.30 MERCHANDISE 309516 924120479 73.60 GOLF CLUB 309517 924120420 317.94 MERCHANDISE 309518 924137027 860.18 MERCHANDISE 309519 924144349 739.81 368974 31712013 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page- 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 05535.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PW BRAEMAR SITE LEAD ABATEMENT 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2013 - 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 35 75 ART WORK SOLD 309582 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 17,434.53 35.75 368980 31712013 123898 CENTURYLINK 368975 31712013 952 920 -1586 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1586 -2113 66.42 952 922 -2444 309322 2444 -2113 82.35 952 831 -0024 309415 246280 5842.5515 952 920 -8632 309727 1,149.35 302.22 309453 246282 5822.5514 368981 31712013 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 4,612.30 309689 246279 5842.5514 PH1093 11,554.00 5,844.00 368982 31712013 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 368976 31712013 150.00 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 309556 030113 796.18 309454 95388 5842.5513 796.18 368977 31712013 102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC. 270.66 MOUSE AND LCD STAND 00004301 309610 X140059 1260.6406 270.66 368978 31712013 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 191.52 CONCRETE PATCH, MIXER 00001692 309726 1312854 5511.6406 191.52 368979 31712013 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 3,113.64 8034001 -1 309316 8034001 -2/13 1552.6186 3,289.54 5546504 -1 309317 5546504 -2/13 1470.6186 6,783.88 5591458-4 309318 5591458 -2113 1551.6186 28.86 5528973-0 309319 5528973 -2/13 1552.6186 4218.61 9724639 -1 309320 9724639 -2/13 5511.6186 17,434.53 368980 31712013 123898 CENTURYLINK 57.25 952 920 -1586 309321 1586 -2113 66.42 952 922 -2444 309322 2444 -2113 121.93 952 831 -0024 309680 0024 -2/13 56.62 952 920 -8632 309727 8632 -2113 302.22 368981 31712013 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 11,554.00 PHEP & CRI CONTRACTS 309611 PH1093 11,554.00 368982 31712013 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 3/10/13 309556 030113 1554.6188 1554.6188 1552.6188 5913.6188 4204.6103 5710.6136 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page- 5 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/612013 7:40:11 Council Check Register Page - 6 3/1/2013 - 3!7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 368983 31712013 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 205.40 309455 0178325013 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 366984 31712013 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 892.18 MARCH 2013 MAINTENANCE 309371 030113 5841.6103 892.18 368985 31712013 120433 COMCAST 107.46 8772 10 614 0396908 309612 396908 -2/13 5760.6105 6.80 8772 10 614 0373022 308613 373022 -2/13 1400.6103 114.26 368986 31712013 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 412.18 MATERIALS TESTING 309445 P00001474 01238.1705.21 412.18 368987 31712013 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 345.24 SAW SUPPLIES 00003590 309489 87952 1470.6406 345.24 368988 3x712013 131660 CREATE FOR LESS LLC 236.88 PAPER MACHE BOXES 00007169 309370 CFL000800302AO8 1624.6406 236.88 368989 3/712013 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 544.00 PUMP SUMP, TRENCH DRAINS 309490 94411 1470.6215 544.00 368990 31712013 104020 DALCO 773.01 FLOOR SCRUBBER PARTS 00003538 308614 2554886 1470.6530 76.15 DRAIN HOSE 00003594 309616 2574321 1470.6530 849.16 368991 31712013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 44.80 309416 690207 5862.5515 2,576.60 309417 690206 5862.5514 378.90 309456 690142 5822.5514 3,272.00 309690 690208 5842.5514 6,272.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT, GENERAL CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Council Check Register Page - 7 3/1/2013 -- 317/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 368992 .31712013 129157 DO -GOOD.BIZ INC 104.08 LIQUOR STORE MAILING 309323 5456 -01 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 104.08 LIQUOR STORE MAILING 309323 5456 -01 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 104.08 LIQUOR STORE MAILING 309323 5456 -01 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 312.24 368993 31712013 131590 DOOLEY, ELIZABETH 15.00 ART WORK SOLD 309583 030113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.00 368994 31712013 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 250.00 VERNON TERRACE BONDS 309544 1853984 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 250.00 368995 31712013 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 22.90 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 00001700 309728 09699700 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 10.92 00001701 309729 09700800 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 11919 00001725 309730 09724900 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 153.01 368996 31712013 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 50.00 STATE OF THE COMMUNITY MEETING 309618 32895 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 50.00 368997 3/712013 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 66.00 309520 #19 5420.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CLUB HOUSE 147.30 309520 #19 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 213.30 368998 3!112013 130998 EMERSON, ANGELA 27.95 ART WORK SOLD 309584 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 27.95 368999 31712013 117375 ESR1 5,336.82 ARC GIS ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 00002517 309545 92618370 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 5,336.82 ARC GIS ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 00002517 309545 92618370 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 10,673.64 369000 317/2013 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 150.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION AGENTS 309546 00 -10603 10044.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB 150.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Council Check Register Page - 8 3/1/2013 - 3!7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 369001 31712013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 77.17 VEHICLE PARTS 309731 1- 4073241 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.30 WATER PUMP 309732 69- 088442 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 734.65- CREDIT 309733 1- 4091688 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 146.44 BATTERIES 309734 1- 4094385 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 162.72 BATTERIES 309735 1 -4096834 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.16- CREDIT 309736 1- 4098797 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.38 OIL FILTERS 309737 69 -09027 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.92 OIL FILTERS 309738 69- 090929 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.22 BATTERY 309739 69- 090979 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.78 BATTERY 309740 1- 4102786 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.70 NOWAUTO BEAMS 309741 1- 4107992 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 82.68 BATTERY 309742 69- 091212 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.85 NON -AUTO BEAMS 309743 69- 091669 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.86 OIL SEALS 309744 69- 092076 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 220.58 BRAKE PAD KIT, ROTORS 309745 69- 092059 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 234.79 369002 31712013 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 234.53 AD FOR BID 309491 10239946 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 240.43 AD FOR BID 309619 10239924 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 474.96 369003 3/7/2013 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 25,751.44 TURN OUT GEAR 00003582 309620 7810 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25,751.44 369004 3/712013 119211 FIRSTLAB 515.55 DRUG TESTING 309621 00616943 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 515.55 369005 31712013 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY - 968.01 REPAIR JETTER NOZZLE 00001777 309547 16018 5920.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SEWER CLEANING 968.01 369006 3/712013 101557 FMAM 105.00 DUES 309492 022713 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 105.00 369007 31712013 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 36.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309493 022713 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1!2013 - 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier f Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 36.16 369008 31712013 120113 FRANCIS, JOYCE 1684 ART WORK SOLD 309585 022613 5101.4413 5120.6406 5101 .4607 5420.6511 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5861.6406 1100.6106 5821.6406 5840.6104 5840.6.107 1,750.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY DESIGN 309436 13034 1130.6103 i 1,750.00 369015 31712013" .131667 HAGGART,.RICHARD 68.21 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND- 309622 5708 YORKAVE 5900.2015 68.21 369016 31712013 125270 HARTFORD = PRIORITY ACCOUNTS Subledger Account Description ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES CLASS REGISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL-SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CUSTOMER REFUND 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page- - 9 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER REVENUES CLUB HOUSE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON OCCUPANCY CITY COUNCIL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY LIQUOR YORK GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 16.84- 369009 31712013 103039 FREY, MICHAEL ' - 104.24 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 309586 030113 104.24 369010 31.712013 131664 GANJE - FLING, MARILYN 138.00 -. CLASS REFUND 30948D 022713 138.00 369011 3.1712013 124541 GEYEN:GROUP 801.56 CARPET CLEANING 00006158 309521 22594 801.56 i 369012 31712013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 74.25 309418 149546 `'- 567.25 309419 149514 442.75 309457 149518 938.00 309458 149592 2,022.25 369013 31712013 101518 GRAUSAM,'STEVE 10.98 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 309522 022813 19.90 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 309522 022813 21.69 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 309522 022813 727.22 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 309523 FEB 100.01 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309524 FEB 2013 879.80 369014 31712013 121536 GRAY MATTER CREATIVE LLC 5120.6406 5101 .4607 5420.6511 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5861.6406 1100.6106 5821.6406 5840.6104 5840.6.107 1,750.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY DESIGN 309436 13034 1130.6103 i 1,750.00 369015 31712013" .131667 HAGGART,.RICHARD 68.21 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND- 309622 5708 YORKAVE 5900.2015 68.21 369016 31712013 125270 HARTFORD = PRIORITY ACCOUNTS Subledger Account Description ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES CLASS REGISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL-SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CUSTOMER REFUND 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page- - 9 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER REVENUES CLUB HOUSE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON OCCUPANCY CITY COUNCIL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY LIQUOR YORK GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20600 CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Council Check Register Page.- 10 3/1/2013 = 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount :Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 5,447.84. MAR 2013 PREMIUM 309525 6209883 -5. '9900:2033.05 -LIFE 'INSURANCE -99 PAYROLL CLEARING 6.65 COBRA- 309526 MAR 2013 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,454.49 369017 3/712013 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 309494 OB21924 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 369018 317/2013 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY 163.36 PRINTER 00004304-309548 52391460 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 319.56 PRINTER 00004307 309.549 52413199 1554.6710 d EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN ­MIS 197.72 LCD .& SPEAKER BAR 00004302 309623 52381028 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 732.81 PC 00004302 309624 52397073 5821.6406. GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 312.08 LCDS 00004305 309625 52411442 1260.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,725.53 369019 31712013 .103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 310.30 BUFFER PADS, CLEANERS 309527 600573819 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES " _ EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 35.66- CREDIT 309528 800063880 5720.6511 -. CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 610.33 SANITIZER, CLEANERS, FOAM WASDD002295 309529 600584431 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 884.97 369020 31712013 100805 "HIRSHFIELD'S 33.85 .PAINT 00006152 309437 03045879. 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 50.75. PAINT 00006156 309438 03046000 5440.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 84.60 369021 3/712013 .104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. r 964.50 309420 637082 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,717.45 309421 637233 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 703.50 309459 637098 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,385.45 369022 31712013 126816 HOME-DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 16.04 TOOLS 309746 021313 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 389.82 TOOLS 309746 0213.13 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE " n 405.86 369023. 31712013 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. ; 44,476.00 GENERAL LIABILITY - 309626. 147587 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 21,366.00 AUTOMOBILE INS 309627 147608 1550.6200 INSURANCE .:. CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,646:00 INLAND.MARINE (COMMERCIAL) 309628 147609 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 3/6/20,- 1:40:11 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 3/112013 — 3(1/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 123,033.00 WORKERS COMP INS 309629 147610 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 192,521.00 369024 31712013 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 24.77 ART WORK SOLD 309587 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 24.77 369025 31712013 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 500.94 CONCESSION PRODUCT 309530 2037715 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 500.94 369026 31712013 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 3,487.83 MAIL WATER BILLS 309495 74414 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 3,487.83 369027 31712013 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 450.00 309691 11196 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 300.00 309692 11170 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 750.00 369028 3P712013 105694 INFRATECH 66.38 REPLACEMENT LEADS FOR LOCAT09D01765 309324 1300023 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 66.38 369029 31712013 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 27.24 MONTHLY SERVICE 309747 10612398 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 27.24 369030 31712013 116152 INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB 370.23 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 309325 022513 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 370.23 369031 31712013 131653 JACKSON, BARBARA 153.00 CLASS REFUND 309479 022713 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 153.00 369032 31712013 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 48,225.46 TURN OUT GEAR 00003581 309630 193364 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 48,225.46 369033 31712013 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 500.00 CONSULTING SERVICE 309496 #2 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2013 - 3(7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 500.00 369034 31712013 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 500.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 309531 JJ5160 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 500.00 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page - 12 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS 369035 31712013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 738.50 309422 2057212 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 53.80 309655 2057217 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 104.00 309656 2057226 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 190.00 309657 2057236 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,065.73 309693 2057231 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,319.65 309694 2057216 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,590.40 309695 2057214 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 49.20- 309696 2015929 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 25,012.88 369037 31712013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 262.00 309423 1507564 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,126.73 309559 1512220 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,241.38 309560 1512216 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10.08 309561 1513782 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,505.68 309562 1513783 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,081.71 309563 1512215 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,443.52 309564 1512217 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,297.91 309565 1512207 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.72 309566 1512196 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.99 309567 1512205 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,286.12 309568 1512204 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,511.58 309569 1512208 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 309570 1512198 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,925.92 309571 1513788 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 281.35 309658 1512222 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12.10 309659 1506102 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,161.50 309660 1512195 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 372.08 309661 1512199 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,277.38 309662 1512219 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,408.40 309663 1512221 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,975.88 309664 1512212 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 233.24 309665 1512206 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.37 309666 1512211 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 572.55 309667 1512213 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/6120',- 1:40:11 Council Check Register Page - 13 3/1/2013 - 317/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,453.96 309668 1512214 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,439.28- 309669 567496 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22,17- 309670 567348 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,674.40 309697 1513781 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,017.91 309698 1512194 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,947.76 309699 1512193 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 777.65 309700 1512197 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,409.18 309701 1512210 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,333.07 309702 1512209 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,640.00 309703 1512935 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 66,839.79 369038 31712013 114568 JOHNSON, MARTI L. 40.30 ART WORK SOLD 309588 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.30 369039 3/712013 102603 JONAS, LENORE 52.95 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 309589 030113 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 52.95 369040 31712013 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA 355.55 ART WORK SOLD 309590 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 355.55' 369041 31712013 126924 KEITH'S TARPS INC. 523.69 UTILITY TRAILER COVER 309326 9685 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 523.69 369042 31712013 129405 KEY ELECTRIC LLC 1,227.50 ELECTRICAL WORK 309532 021813 -06 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,227.50 369043 31712013 131652 KLEIN, AVA 76.00 CLASS REFUND 309478 022713 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 76.00 369044 31712013 101502 KONTERS, VIKTORS 79.90 UNIFORM PURCHASE 309327 022613 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.90 369045 31712013 121423 LABOR LAW CENTER INC. 359.10 COMPLIANCE POSTERS 00004019 3139439 1224125 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Council Check Register Page - 14 3/1/2013 — 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 359.10 369046 31712013 131651 LAMPERT, BARBARA 8.00 CLASS OVERPAYMENT REFUND 309372 SKATER AEROBICS 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 8.00 369047 31712013 131661 LANGE, KAT 7.80 ART WORK SOLD 309591 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 7.80 369048 3/712013 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 1,144.20 REPAIRS TO TRACTOR 00002311 309631 255602 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,144.20 369049 31712013 116882 LIPPERT, BARBARA 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 309592 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 369050 31712013 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 842.10 SWIVEL LIFT KIT, YOKE 00005896 309328 00050329 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 842.10 369051 317/2013 100858 LOGIS 3,817.00 309440 36217/362721363 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 00 3,894.00 309440 36217/36272/363 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 00 4,951.00 309440 36217/36272/363 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 00 6,711.00 309440 36217/36272/363 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 00 8,371.00 309440 36217/36272/363 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 00 11,116.00 309440 36217/36272/363 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 00 13,659.00 309440 36217/36272/363 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 00 668.25 NETWORK SUPPORT 309632 36383 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,165.25 NETWORK SUPPORT 309633 36187 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 55,352.50 369052 31712013 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP CITY OF EDINA 3/6/20'1.. 7:40:11 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 3/1/2013 — 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,542.56 309460 147742 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10.80- 309461 148028 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,156.44 309704 148337 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,688.20 369053 31712013 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 596.75 HYDRAULIC FILTER KITS 00005045 309329 2131474 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.14 BEARING 309330 2131442 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 665.89 369054 31712013 131659 MCCLAIN, CHRISTOPHER & CAROLYN 12,200.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION FOR LS 309550 021613 10044.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB 12,200.00 369055 31712013 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 3/14/13 309557 030113 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 369056 31712013 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,270.00 PLYMOUTH PLAYHOUSE TRIP 309497 022213 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,270.00 369057 31712013 101483 MENARDS 179.73 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 00008072 309748 16915 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 179.73 369058 31712013 101987 MENARDS 75.81 ICE MELT, TAPE, BLEACH 00002298 309533 04748 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 75.81 369059 31712013 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 114.00 OFFICIATING FEES 309634 4308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 114.00 369060 31712013 100892 MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO. IN 31.92 RIBBONS, ROSETTES 00009241 309635 113224 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 31.92 369061 31712013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,225.00 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 00001769 309331 34308 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,225.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2013 — 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No 369062 31712013 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 255.05 METHANEAIR 309749 183071395 7413.6545 255.05 369063 31712013 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,118.00 CONNECTION FEE 309332 022113 5915.6136 22,118.00 369064 3/712013 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 186.39 PUMP, STRAINER, GAUGE 00005798 309333 0097476 -IN 1553.6530 69.64 FLOODJET TIPS 00005801 309334 0097494 -IN 1553.6530 256.03 369065 31712013 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 52.19 FOREI POSTERS 00006133 309534 12946 5410.6122 52.19 369066 31712013 128254 MN HELICOPTERS INC. - 1,067.50 DEER MANAGEMENT 309551 3122 1509.6103 1,067.50 369067 31712013 131657 MNIAAI 75.00 DUES 309498 022713 1470.6105 75.00 369068 31712013 129086 MONTGOMERY, MEREDITH 21.94 ART WORK SOLD 309593 022613 5101.4413 21.94 369069 3M2013 131666 MOOTY, CHARLES 145.51 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 309482 4805 SUNNYSLOPE 5900.2015 145.51 369070 31712013 131577 MRA -THE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATI 1,295.00 131068 MEMBERSHIP 309441 00124600 1120.6105 1,295.00 369071 317/2013 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 203.97 FLAGS, CUPS, TEE SIGNS 00002309 309636 888343 -00 5761.6406 203.97 369072 31712013 104078 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES Subledger Account Description CHEMICALS 31612013 7:40:11 Page - 16 Business Unit PSTF FIRE TOWER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEER CONTROL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 3/1/2013 — 317/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,813.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 309373 87619 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 3,813.00 369073 31712013 131668 NELSON, PETER 199.50 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 309637 6532 NAVAHO TR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 189.50 369074 31712013 131649 NEOPOST GREAT PLAINS 26.07 LABELS FOR POSTAGE MACHINE 309335 GPAR5065 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 26.07 369076 31712013 100763 NEOPOST USA INC 305.00 RATE CHANGE FOR SCALE 309336 13879046 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 305.00 369076 31712013 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 991.35 TABLECOVERS 309535 213815 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 991.35 369077 31712013 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 804.00 309572 79752 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 804.00 369078 31712013 116622 NORMANDALE CENTER FOR 4,200.00 2013 FUNDING 309638 2013 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 4,200.00 369079 31712013 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 144.04 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 309446 IN41705 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 144.04 369080 31712013 131658 NORTHLAND CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 1,500.00 GROTTO CONSTRUCTION 309761 1282 -11 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 1,500.00 369081 31712013 131662 NOVAK, BERNIE 11.70 ART WORK SOLD 309594 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 11.70 369082 31712013 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 56.55 ART WORK SOLD 309595 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 56.55 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 369083 3/712013 1 102440 PASS, GRACE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 42.25 ARTWORK SOLD 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 42.25 309705 369084 31712013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 309573 2384818 720.20 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 309574 1,354.07 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 326.87 2384812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7.00- 309671 2384815 5822.5514 2,394.14 BOTH ST SELLING 369086 31712013 5862.5512 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. VERNON SELLING 309673 1,105.00 IT CONSULTING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,105.00 2384813 369086 3!712013 VERNON SELLING 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 2384824 5862.5513 616.88 VERNON SELLING 309676 2384819 225.30 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 309706 842.18 5822.5513 369087 3M2013 309707 122417 PETTY CASH 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1.68 PETTY CASH 18.23 PETTY CASH 18.52 PETTY CASH 20.34 PETTY CASH 58.77 369068 31712013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,336.21 960.21 1,173.74 140.00 460.32 1,019.07 253.79 663.17 750.27 4 n4i oe 8,353.51 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2013 - 317/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309596 022613 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page - 18 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 309424 8389469 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 309425 8389460 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 309462 8389466 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 309705 8390085 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 309639 22313009 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 309337 09421622 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD' ARENA CONCESSIONS 309536 09421654 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 309750 030513 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 309750 030513 7410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 309750 030513 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 309750 030513 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 309573 2384818 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 309574 2384820 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 309575 2384812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 309671 2384815 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 309672 2384823 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 309673 2384821 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 309674 2384813 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 309675 2384824 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 309676 2384819 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 309706 2384811 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 309707 2384814 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register . Page - 19 3/1/2013 - 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 369089 3f712013 100119 PING 315.19 IRON SET 309338 11631458 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 909.00 GOLF BAGS 309339 11637257 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,224.19 369090 3!712013 • 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 7,269.32 NEW PLANTS FOR GROTTO 309340 315193 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 161.18 PLANT MAINTENANCE 309341 315194 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4,569.92 OCT & NOV PLANT SERVICE 309759 313083 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 12,000.42 369091 3/712013 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 46.30 PEST CONTROL 309751 3558495 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.30 369092 31712013 106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH 78.00 ED911 CARDSET MAINTENANCE 309752 84375 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 78.00 369093 3/712013 131660 PROHASKA, KARI 54.00 MODEL 309597 030113 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 54.00 369094 31712013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 260.78 STORAGE BIN 00008052 309342 5924 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 199.86 VACUUM 00008067 309343 5898 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,140.94 MOP BUCKET, CART, ICE MELT 00008053 309344 5895 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 443.31 TISSUE, LINERS, WIPES 00008024 309760 5961 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,044.89 369095 31712013 122170 REGION 3AA 3,337.94 % SEMI FINAL GAMES 309753 030113 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,805.63 % SEMI FINAL GAMES 309753 030113 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 8,143.57 369096 3)'712013 131655 RUD, HOLLY 153.00 CLASS REFUND 309481 022713 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 153.00 P 369097 31712013 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO. 179.41 MAT 00005166 309345 X62792 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.41 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2013 — 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 369098 31712013 127049 SCHNEIDER, KATHERINE 320.00 FITNESS TRAINING 309499 022613 1470.6104 320.00 369099 31712013 128052 SECAP 97.72 POSTAGE MACHINE SUPPLIES 309447 81143512 1550.6235 97.72 369100 31712013 100995 SEH 605.80 ANTENNA PROJECT CONSULTING 309346 265951 1001.4722 296.64 RAW WM 309448 265898 05501.1705.21 605.93 BRAEMAR HILLS LIGHTING 309448 265898 08059.1705.21 1,508.37 369101 31712013 102870 SEIFERT, ELIZABETH 24.70 ART WORK SOLD 309598 022613 5101.4413 24.70 369102 3f112013 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 4,228.50 FSAIVEBAADMIN 309640 907797,912058 1550.6200 4,228.50 369103 3/712013 101106 SERVICEMASTER 261.85 CLEANUP SERVICES 309500 42000 5821.6162 261.85 369104 3!112013 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 111.80 ART WORK SOLD 309599 022613 5101.4413 139.44 GALLERY SUPPLIES 309600 030113 5120.6406 251.24 369105 31712013 • 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 287.49 ACROBAT PRO 00004304 309641 B00940381 1400.6160 287.50 ACROBAT PRO 00004304 309641 800940381 1260.6406 574.99 369106 31712013 120784 SIGN PRO 477.73 DASHERBOARD 309442 6431 5510.6103 477.73 369107 31712013 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POSTAGE RENTAL OF PROPERTY CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION ART WORK SOLD INSURANCE SERVICES CUSTODIANS ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page - 20 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES WM -501 RAW WATER WELL9 TO WiP6 L -59 BRAEMAR HILLS B ART CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 i 3/1/2013 - 31712013 - Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 37.41 JAN 2013 SERVICE FEE 309537 66068 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 37.41 369108 31712013 101000 SIR SPEEDY - - 188.63 BUSINESS CARDS 309642 75915 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ' CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 188.63 _ 369109 31712013_ 131666 SKOGLUND, BRADY 55.74 WELCOME MATS 309643 STATE OF THE 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNITY 55.74 369110 31712013 117819 SOUTH OF THE RIVER COMMUNITY B. 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 3 /17/13 309558 036113 5710:6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER - EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 75.00 369111 31712013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,454.44 309426 1006955 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,192.50 309427 1006956 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,380.00 309463 1006953 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ' YORK SELLING . 2,429.85 309464 1006952 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,413.02 309465 1006949 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - 50TH ST SELLING 40.62 309466 1006954 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,415.00 309576 1008142 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD_WINE YORK-SELLING 1,046.00 309677 1006950 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,405.23 309708 1006951 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,121.48 309709 1008144 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING - 4,246.20 309710 1008145 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 28,144.34 369112 31712013 110977 SOW, ADAMA 87.75 ARTWORK SOLD 309601 022613 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 87.75 369113 31712013 104672 SPRINT 4.40 309555 873184124123 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS' 33.95 309555 873184124123 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 35.06 309555 873184124123 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 38.06 309555 873184124123 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 41.58 309555 873184124123 4090.6188 =TELEPHONE- 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 50.91 309555 873184124123 1490.6188' TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 53.02 309555 873184124123 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS CITY OF EDINA TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Council Check Register ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/1/2013 - 3/7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 65.27 GENERAL (BILLING) 309555 873184124123 1554.6230 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 71.28 309555 873184124123 7411.6188 95.26 309555 873184124123 1495.6188 102.08 309555 873184124123 1553.6188 105.45 309555 873184124123 1260.6188 143.44 309555 873184124123 5422.6188 145.84 309555 873184124123 1400.6406 155.25 309555 873184124123 1301.6188 166.32 309555 873184124123 1240.6188 193.11 309555 873184124123 1322.6188 290.84 309555 873184124123 1640.6188 471.36 309555 673184124123 5910.6188 788.55 309555 873184124123 1470.6151 1,997.47 309555 873184124123 1400.6188 5,048.50 369114 317/2013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 61.17 RELEASE VALVES 00001680 309501 S2677848.001 1470.6530 291.26 WATER HEATER CONTROLLER 00001680 309502 52677848.002 1470.6530 352.43 369115 31712013 129745 ST LOUIS PARK DO GRILL AND CHI 171.00 DILLY BARS 309538 601 5730.5510 171.00 369116 31712013 129409 STEEN, BARB 22.10 ART WORK SOLD 309602 022613 5101.4413 22.10 369117 31712013 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 3.63 RESTOCKING FEE - RETURNED PAR170005971 309347 25194 1553.6530 250.70 HYDRAULIC PUMP MOTOR 00005012 309348 25195 1553.6530 254.33 369118 3f712013 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 150.00 REMOVE DECALS/CLEAN FOR DETAIL 309349 623936 1553.6180 1,317.50 VEHICLE REPAIRS 309350 623952 1553.6180 68.02 LAMP 00005044 309351 458217 1553.6530 1,535.52 369119 31712013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 38.97 PUBLISH NOTICE 309374 1424225 1120.6120 31612013 7:40:11 Page - 22 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 2,135.90 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page - 23 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BROWNDALE DAM REPAIR COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 315.01 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 369120 31712013 118750 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INC. Council Check Register 47,861.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 3/1/2013 - 3/7/2013 030813 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 103.92 AD FOR BID 309375 1424224 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 123.41 AD FOR BID 309376 1424223 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 4871 PUBLISH NOTICE 309644 1425349 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 2,135.90 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page - 23 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BROWNDALE DAM REPAIR COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 315.01 369120 31712013 118750 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INC. 47,861.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 309477 030813 04400.1705.30 47,861•.24 369121 31712013 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 813.00 309428 010730 5862.5514 1,577.00 309711 010678 5842.5514 2,390.00 369122 31712013 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 309603 022613 5101.4413 22.75 369123 31712013 122551 TAP PUBLISHING 66.95 WEATHER TAP SUBSCRIPTION 00004310 309645 1493186- 2013030 5410.6105 1 334.70 WEATHER TAP SUBSCRIPTION 00004310 309645 1493186 - 2013030 1552.6406 1 401.65 369124 31712013 101027 TARGET BANK 104.76 X- XXX -XX9 -840 309352 FRAMES 5410.6406 104.76 369125 31712013 130357 TASC 794.00 ANNUAL RENEWAL FEE, JAN 2013 309443 IN152434 1120.6103 794.00 369126 31712013 104932 TAYLOR MADE 170.37 MERCHANDISE 309539 19196469 5440.5511 90.78 309540 19207298 5440.5511 261.15 369127 31712013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 56.80 309429 739262 5862.5515 2.079.10 309467 739261 5862.5514 2,135.90 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page - 23 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BROWNDALE DAM REPAIR COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES Council Check Register 3/1/2013 — 3(7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 369128 31712013 102636 TIMEMARK INCORPORATED 340.01 TRAFFIC CONTROLLER REPAIR 00002519 309449 113965 1260.6406 340.01 369129 31712013 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 26815 2/19/13 COUNCIL MINUTES 309646 M19631 1120.6103 268.75 369130 31712013 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 130.28 ANTENNA, LIGHTASSEMBLY 00005856 309754 591285GP 1553.6530 13.62 FILTERS 00006310 309755 602246GP 1553.6530 73.65 PIN 00005949 309756 610359GP 1553.6530 217.55 369131 3/712013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 72.14 WELDING SUPPLIES 00002308 309647 126947 5761.6406 72.14 369132 3M2013 123649 TOWMASTER 113,867.83 TRUCK BODY, PLOW EQUIPMENT 00005308 309450 346059 5900.1740 113,867.83 369133 31712013 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 448.80 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAMS 309648 102022596 1470.6175 448.80 369134 31712013 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 600.00 DOOR REPAIRS 00008055 309353 564380 5511.6180 600.00 369135 31712013 122321 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC. 420.00 JETTING AND ROOT CUTTING 309649 44207 5111.6180 420.00 369136 31712013 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 1,721.51 STOP BOX LOCATORS 00001760 309354 889248 5913.6556 1,721.51 369137 31712013 100050 USPS - HASLER 8,000.00 ACCT # 75983 309650 MAR 2013 1550.6235 8,000.00 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page - 24 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT \ TOOLS DISTRIBUTION POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 3/6/2013 7:40:11 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 3/1/2013 - 3(7/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 369138 317/2013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 109.46 ROLL TOWELS, SOAP 309355 264452 -00 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 109.46 369139 31712013 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 5.10- 309552. 2870872951 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 32.93 309552 2870872951 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 32.93 309552 2870872951 5952.6188 TELEPHONE RECYCLING 34.85 309552 2870872951 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 40.01 309552 2870872951 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 98.77 309552 2870872951 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 234.39 - 369140 31712013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 25.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 309757 7068954 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 669.82 309758 7078978 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS. 695.54 369141 3/112013 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 29.93 SAFETY GLASSES 00005912 309356 317353 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 29.93 369142 31712013 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,714.18 CONCESSION PRODUCT 309357 35846324 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,033.88 CONCESSION PRODUCT 309358 35901184 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 2,748.06 369143 3/712013 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 810.48 LEAK LOCATES 00001764 309359 3769 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 810.48 369144 317/2013 130574 WATSON COMPANY 649.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 309360 823431 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 649.00 369145 3/712013 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 758.09 . JAN 2013 WEB ANALYTICS 309451 826576954 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 758.09 369146 3/712013 123364 WHITE, SHAUN 75.47 STORAGE BINS FOR AMBULANCES 309651 022313 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 101312 WINE MERCHANTS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 309470 444899 5842.5513 3/1/2013 - 3M2013 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 75.47 YORK SELLING 1.12 309578 369147 3!712013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 555.55 309468 323555 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 797.20 309469 323450 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 988.50 309678 323554 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3/6/2013 7:40:11 Page - 26 Business Unit VERNON SELLING BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 369148 37112013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 88.00 309470 444899 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 359.36 309577 445480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 309578 445478 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,085.15 309579 445481 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 728.96 309712 445477 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 5,262.59 369149 3!712013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,146.48 309430 1080008392 5662.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 110.30 309431 1080008494 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,795.00 309432 1080008393 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON.SELLING 151.86 309471 1080005848 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,350.63 309472 1080008495 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,079.31 309473 1080008498 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,422.08 309474 1080008497 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 97.16 309475 1080008499 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,197.60 309679 1080008496 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8,754.73 309713 1080008500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,402.79 309714 1080009674 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22,507.94 369160 31712013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 1,021.90 309433 1090008446 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 64.50 309434 1090008447 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 352.00 309715 1090009182 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,690.00 309716 1090009181 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 303.00 309717 1090011457 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,602.45 309718 1090011456 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 76.50 309719 1090011455 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 1,958.05 309720 1090011454 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,701.80 309721 1090011453 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 12,770.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # - 369151 31712013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,271.00 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 1,271.00 369152 31712013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 57.04 51- 8976004 -9 241.79 51- 8987646 -8 8,641.58 51- 6644819 -9 284.22 51- 6223269 -1 1,156.93 51- 5107681 -4 67.24 51- 8997917 -7 13.33 51- 6541084 -2 ,13.33 51- 6050184 -2 126.62 51- 9608462 -5 40.30 51- 0193479 -4 905.52 51- 9011854 -4 34.77 51 -0160483 -1 25.27 51- 9770163-0 114.89 51- 9770164 -7 35.93 51- 0194596 -8 61.85 51-1420190 -3 43.20 51- 0223133 -2 36,072.04 514621797 -2 3,148.90 51- 6227619 -3 51,084.95 1,077,585.99 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1/2013 - 3!7/2013 Doc No Inv No Account No 309553 27- 01686 -170 05516.1705.21 309361 358976114 309362 358975598 309363 358945077 309364 358937326 309365 358919499 309366 358823489 309367 358789503 309377 358782685 309378 358986981 309379 358842303 309380 358975145 309381 358692258 309382 358831623 309383 358832662 309384 358692123 309385 358754846 309386 358693750 309554 359183098 309652 357608001 1321.6185 1321.6185 5720.6165 5210.6185 5111.6185 1321.6185 1646.6185 4086.6103, 5921.6185 5934.6185 5913.6185 1330.6185 1321.6185 1321.6185 1321.6185 1321.6185 1322.6185 1321.6185 5761.6185 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING INSPECTION LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,077,585.99 Total Payments 1,077,585.99 316/201 �3 7:40:11 Page 27 Business Unit W 44TH ST RECON STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GOLF DOME PROGRAM ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE AQUATIC WEEDS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT STORM LIFT STATION MAINT DISTRIBUTION TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R65CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/612013 7:41:44 Council Check Summary Page - 1 311/2013 3!7/2013 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 435,381.35 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 78.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 130,923.92 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,649.04 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 284.22 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 37.41 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 3,883.31 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 24,675.61 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 29,609.04 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,765,67 05800 LIQUOR FUND 209,128.61 05900 UTILITY FUND 179,791.41 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 47,901.54 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.93 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,996.09 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,447.84 Report Totals 1,077,585.99 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/14/2013 - 3/1412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 369153 3114/2013 125324 3M 121.25 PRESCRIPTION SAFETY GLASSES 309762 02243152 1301.6610 173.00 309763 02243172 1301.6610 90.00 309764 02243154 1552.6610 384.25 369154 311412013 100613 AAA 11.70 VEHICLE PLATES 310001 030613 1553.6260 11.70 369155 3/1412013 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 311.22 UB TEMP 309765 37413141 5910.6103 311.22 369156 311412013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 44.40 310187 1659891 5822.5515 135.60 310188 1659895 5842.5515 180.00 369157 311412013 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 175.58 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001736 309766 208501 5912.6406 175.56 369168 3114/2013 131688 ADLER, LAURA 150.00 BANK DIRECT DEPOSIT ERROR 310146 REFUND 1260.6010 150.00 369159 311412013 121667 ADVANCED FIRST AID INC. 290.60 AED SUPPLIES 310147 0113 -385 5511.6406 290.60 369160 311412013 131689 AIRWATCH LLC 3,700.00 MOBILE DEVICE MANAGEMENT 00004309 310148 AWUS -3636 1554.6103 3,700.00 369161 311412013 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 34,192.80 RECYCLING 310149 3120315 5952.6183 34,192.80 369162 3114/2013 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 27.96 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 309904 ALERTINV15321 1130.6406 27.96 Subledger Account Description SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT LICENSES & PERMITS 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page- 1 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS RECYCLING CHARGES GENERALSUPPLIES RECYCLING COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 2 3/14/2013 -311412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 369163 311412013 127366 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 88.35 LIGHTS 00005041 309767 AFS- 230570001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.35 369164 3114/2013 101479 AMERICAN SERVICES CORP. 74.76 BALER TWINE 310035 2996 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 74.76 369165 311412013 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 33.87 309844 022813 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 64.98 309844 022813 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 146.22 3D9844 022813 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 146.40 309844 022813 1470.6201 LAUNDRY. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 166.75 309844 022813 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 249.78 309844 022813 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 361.10 309844 022813 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,169.10 369166 311412013 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 841.54 FOOD 309905 1889160 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 841.54 369167 311412013 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 81.25 RESTOCKING FEE FOR RETURN 310076 10113426 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.25 369168 3/1412013 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 257.22 WASTE DISPOSAL 309768 03/2013 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 33.00 309769 030113 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 309769 030113 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 36.00 309769 030113 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 44.71 309769 030113 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 66.29 309769 030113 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.66 309769 030113 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 89.06 309769 030113 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 99.35 309769 030113 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 131.26 309769 030113 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 134.79 309769 030113 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 202.56 309769 030113 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 202.56 309769 030113 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 207.79 309769 030113 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 309970 46355 369176 311412013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 100.27 TAB DIVIDERS 309845 OE- 311851 -1 5822.5514 1140.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 235.10 309769 030113 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 646.03 309769 030113 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,487.66 369169 311412013 119465 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNT 50.00 JOB POSTING 310077 36364 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50.00 369170 311412013 123795 AXEL H OHMAN CO 33,615.00 GROTTO CONSTRUCTION 310234 APPL 1 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 33,615.00 369171 311412013 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 763.49 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 310078 3884 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 REPAIR LIGHT BAR 310150 3855 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 913.49 369172 311412013 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 942.50 STORMWATER MGMT 310079 23270354.00 -196 04393.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LAKE EDINAA RECON 942.50 369173 311412013 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 19.88 9V BATTERIES 310002 018 - 296182 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19.88 369174 3114/2013 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 553.30 309969 77168400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 81.55 310046 77263600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 292.65 310047 77091300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 288.00- 310048 77108200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.55 310189 88100100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 384.05 310190 77263800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 815.70 310191 77263300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 617.30 310192 77263400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,466.10 369175 311412013 125139 BERNICICS 309970 46355 369176 311412013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 100.27 TAB DIVIDERS 309845 OE- 311851 -1 5822.5514 1140.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3114/2013 - 311412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 31.16 CARD GUIDES 00009243 309906 OE- 311811 -1 5110.6513 131.43 369177 311412013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 49.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 309770 84596 1552.6406 49.96 369178 311412013 131494 BONNER & LEACH LLP 18,333.34 FEB 2013 FEES 310151 030613 1195.6103 18,333.34 369179 311412013 131681 BOSTROM SHEET METAL WORKS INC. 2,580.00 DUCT REPAIR 00001642 310003 9614 5913.6180 2,580.00 369180 3/1412013 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 417.52 310193 112324 5842.5513 417.52 369181 311412013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 55.03 EXHAUST PIPE 00005974 309771 716053X1 1553.6530 126.97 ALUMINUM, FILTERS 00005047 309772 717540 1553.6530 155.76 SHOCKABSORBERS 00005050 309773 718756 1553.6530 63.00 PANEL 00005021 309774 718851 1553.6530 402.49 BRAKE ADJUSTER, CHAMBER BU 00005022 309775 719623 1553.6530 400.56- CREDIT 00005008 309776 CM715241X1 1553.6530 206.59 ADJUSTER, BRAKE CHAMBER 00005024 309777 719814 1553.6530 585.62 HINGEASSEMBLY 00005026 310004 721094 1553.6530 1,194.90 369182 311412013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,191.50 CONCRETE TESTING 310080 365744 5500.1705 663.65 MATERIALS TESTING 310081 365981 01398.1705.20 390.50 MATERIALS TESTING 310082 366095 04400.1705.21 2,245.65 369183 311412013 101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC. 865.69 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTS 00001726 309778 037295 1330.6530 865.69 369184 311412013 121518 BUSHNELL OUTDOOR PRODUCTS 1,245.89 MERCHANDISE 310083 125101 5440.5511 Subledger Account Description OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page- 4 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET LAKE EDINA B BROWNDALE DAM REPAIR TRAFFIC SIGNALS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 5 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 215.00- RETURN CREDIT 310084 942165 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,030.89 369185 3/1412013 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 1,284.78 GOLF BALLS 309846 924147722 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 13.49 SHIPPING CHARGE 309847 924147726 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6,356.33 MERCHANDISE 309907 924162569 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 760.92 MERCHANDISE 310085 924173608 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,116.46 310086 924181245 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 11,531.98 369186 3114/2013 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 70.72 OCE USAGE 309848 987934873 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 70.72 369187 3/14/2013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3,690.30 309971 249686 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 342.00 310194 249685 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,032.30 369188 311412013 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 195.00 309972 95440 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 109.50 310195 95452 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 304.50 369189 311412013 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 1,144.06 POCKETJET 6 ENGINES 00003155 310087 2218347 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,144.06 369190 311412013 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 63.24 9546705 -6 309849 9546705 -2/13 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 1,600.55 5584304 -9 309850 5584304 -2/13 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 62.30 5584310 -6 309851 5584310 -2113 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 36.15 5590919-6 309852 5590919 -2113 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 156.98 5586524 -8 309908 5596524 -2/13 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,919.22 369191 3114/2013 123898 CENTURYLINK 109.92 952 826 -7398 309853 7398 -2113 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 86.08 952 941 -1019 309854 1019 -2/13 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 854.83 952 927 -8861 309855 8861 -2/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 56.40 952 929 -0297 309856 0297 -2113 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 6 3/14/2013 -3/14/201.3 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 40.84 952 922 -9246 310005 9246 -2113 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 122.57 952 926 -0419 310152 0419 -3/13 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.65 651 281 -1355 B001311 310153 1311 -3/13 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 56.62 310154 0146 -2/13 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 59.32 310154 0146 -2/13 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 121.60 310154 0146 -2113 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 140.83 310154 0146 -2/13 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 168.12 310154 0146 -2/13 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 192.19 310154 0146 -2113 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 237.00 310154 0146 -2/13 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 273.79 310154 0146 -2/13 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,595.73 310154 0146 -2113 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 4,138.49 369192 311412013 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 6,718.56 LAB SERVICES 309857 030113 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 6,718.56 369193 311412013 100667 CITY OF RICHFIELD 22.63 XCEL BILLING FOR LS 00001778 309779 5530 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAIM 22.63 369194 3114/2013 101346 COLOURS 290.00 TEMPLATE DESIGN 309909 10361 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 290.00 369196 3114/2013 120433 COMCAST 96.60 8772 10 614 0177449 309910 177449 -2113 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 90.90 8772 10 614 0164959 309911 164959 -2/13 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 187.50 369196 3114/2013 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 313.33 COMCAST ADVERTISING 310036 480420 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 313.33 COMCAST ADVERTISING 310036 480420 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 313.34 COMCAST ADVERTISING 310036 480420 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 940.00 369197 311412013 131697 COMMERCIAL DOOR SYSTEMS INC. 865.00 DOOR, FRAME, HARDWARE 310233 0097196 -IN 5500.1785 CONCESSION EQUIP ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 665.00 369198 3114/2013 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 7 3/14/2013 — 3114/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 554.15 OLYMPIC CONTROL BOX 00009232 310088 INV000074807 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 755.93 CLAY 00009239 310089 INV006075430 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 65.99 KILN REPAIR 00009232 310090 INV000075782 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,376.07 369199 311412013 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,064.27 STAFF UNIFORMS 309780 19534 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 1,064.27 369200 311412013 103330 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT 152.03 PIN, WASHERS, BUSHINGS 00005020 309912 FP149999 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 152.03 369201 311412013 130171 CTM SERVICES INC. 719.84 HYDRAULIC MOTOR 00005010 309913 2693 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 719.84 369202 311412013 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 155.24 114 - 10014090 -3 310091 022813 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 155.24 369203 311412013 129163 CURTISS, SARA 96.00 SENIOR TRIP REFUND 310006 030413 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 96.00 369204 311412013 104020 DALCO 550.55 CAN LINERS, SOAP, CLEANER 00009245 309914 2575656 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT .181.77 PUNCH DEGREASER 00005935 310007 2576777 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 732.32 369205 311412013 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 38.86 DAIRY 309915 022513 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 38.86 369206 311412013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,745.30 309973 691043 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,436.90 310049 691109 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 207.39 310196 691111 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,389.59 369207 311412013 118063 DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL 1,801.94 RUBBER COVERS 309781 13 -03 -01 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 311312013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 8 3/14/2013 -311412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,801.94 369208 311412013 101657 DEHN, BRUCE 201.49 UNIFORM PURCHASE 309858 022613 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 201.49 369209 311412013 127045 DEHNEL, JOHN 135.59 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309859 022613 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 135.59 369210 311412013 131551 DELANEY CONSULTING LLC 600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 310037 1269 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 310037 1269 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 310037 1269 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,800.00 - 369211 3114/2013 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 28.51 WRENCH, SOCKET 00005923 309782 772272 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.51 369212 311412013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 938.20 110311893 309916 110311893 -2/13 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 56.30 310092 650243624 -2/13 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 994.50 369213 311412013 129191 DICK & RICKS AUTO INTERIORS 431.51 VEHICLE REPAIRS 309917 28987 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 431.51 369214 311412013 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 310038 31227 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 310038 31227 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 683.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 310038 31227 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,050.00 369215 311412013 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC 400.00 310197 5509 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 400.00 369216 3/1412013 131677 DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES 600.00 LEADERSHIP TRAINING 310008 P- 1305 -7 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 600.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 311412013 104004 ESSIG, CRAIG CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 2,640.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 310095 030713 3/14/2013 -3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 369217 3/14/2013 131674 DUDA PLUMBING 3114/2013 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 185.00 REPAIR BROKEN PIPE 00001774 309918 789194 5913.6180 5,486.00 185.00 309924 030513 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 369218 311412013 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 1,445.52 MERCHANDISE 309919 492340 5440.5511 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 1,445.52 369219 311412013 201.00 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 310198 125 -2736 5822.5515 40.14 CODING TAPE 00001749 310093 09745000 1322.6406 33.92 ELECTRICAL OUTLETS 00001737 310094 09747900 5912.6406 6.33 FITTINGS 000.01769 310155 09748700 5913.6406 23.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 06001740 310156 09741100 5511.6406 1553.6530 103.93 80.88 ROTOR 369220 311412013 70- 136998 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS REPAIR PARTS 85.50 MANAGEMENT FEE 309860 FEB 2013 1550.6155 85.50 369221 3114/2013 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 885.35 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003872 309920 1532297 1470.6510 24.10 00003872 309921 1534111 1470.6510 112.98 00003872 309922 1534717 1470.6510 114.30 00003871 309923 1536051 1470.6510 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS Business Unit DISTRIBUTION 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 9 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL WELL HOUSES DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 369222 311412013 104004 ESSIG, CRAIG 2,640.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 310095 030713 1470.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS 2,640.00 369223 3114/2013 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,486.00 FEB 2013 BILLINGS 309924 030513 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,486.00 369224 311412013 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 201.00 310198 125 -2736 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 201.00 369225 311412013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 152.86 BOLTS 309783 1 -4112338 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 80.88 ROTOR 309784 70- 136998 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 .595.41 CITY OF EDINA 369226 Council Check Register 130136 FADS, SUSAN 3114/2013 -3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 71.01 SHOE KIT 309785 69- 092235 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 62.02 DOOR JAMB SWITCH 309786 1- 4112380 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 158.41 FVP 81) 309787 69- 092245 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 70.23 SENSOR 309788 69- 092378 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING GENERAL SKATING & HOCKEY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING .595.41 369226 311412013 130136 FADS, SUSAN 135.60 JANIFEB MILEAGE 310157 030813 1600.6107 135.60 369227 3114/2013 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 228.61 AD FOR BID 310096 10247679 1120.6120 184.28 AD FOR BID 310097 10247892 1120.6120 204.86 AD FOR BID 310183 10256657 1120.6120 617.77 369228 311412013 1 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 309789 2459317 1260.6103 425.00 369229 3114/2013 129945 FISHER, MARK 289.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 310158 030813 1622.6107 289.85 369230 311412013 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 508.80 MERCHANDISE 309925 40664262 5440.5511 508.80 309926 40664193 5440:5511 1,017.60 369231 311412013 124352 GEARGRID CORPORATION 1,148.91 SKATE RACK 00008044 309861 0007342 -IN 5511.6406 1,148.91 369232 311412013 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 46.33 R -91 PHONE 309927 4541996 1470.6188 46.33 369233 3/1412013 102540 GOERGEN, DAVID 19.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 310009 030713 5919.6104 359.01 REIMBURSE AIRFARE 310010 ACEC AWARDS 5919.6104 378.22 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING GENERAL SKATING & HOCKEY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 11 3/14/2013 -3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 369234 311412013 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 355.00 FEB 2013 SERVICE 00001780 309791 63778 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 355.00 369236 311412013 101103 GRAINGER 121.94 MEASURING TAPES, PAD 00001679 309792 9071194998 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 341.19 TOOL KIT, BATTERIES 00001677 309793 9070415303 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 35.00 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES, BRACKETS 00005922 309794 9071345442 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 48.78 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES, BRACKETS 00005922 309794 9071345442 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.00 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES, BRACKETS 00005922 309794 9071345442 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 102.00 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES, BRACKETS 00005922 309794 9071345442 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 102.00 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES, BRACKETS 00005922 309794 9071345442 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 25.15 SAFETY GLASSES 00005922 309795 9071345459 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.90 SAFETY GLASSES 00005922 309795 9071345459 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4.87 BAG CLAMP 00001573 309796 9072019996 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 40.58 FACE SHIELDS 00005016 309797 9072308373 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.40 BATTERIES 00005927 309798 9074668212 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 16.32 SAFETY GLASSES 00005927 309798 9074668212 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 59.38 SAFETY GLASSES 00005927 309798 9074668212 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 68.39 SAFETY GLASSES, BATTERIES 00005928 309799 9076022335 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 345.02 CAR WASH SOAP, GLOVES 00006193 309928 9067171042 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 88.21 TRUCK WASH 00006193 309929 9068049635 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 352.82 TRUCK WASH 00006193 309930 9068049643 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 352.82- RETURN 309931 9074080947 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 235.34 HARD HATS, WIRE WHEELS 00001770 309932 9077203199 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 4.87- RETURN 309933 9077995349 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 53.83 DRUM COVER 00001689 369934 9077995331 1280.6271 HAZ WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 17.98 SAFETY GLASSES 00005929 309935 9078272946 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 54.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005929 309936 9077863836 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 59.58 SAFETY GLASSES 00005929 309936 9077863836 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 21.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005932 309937 9079556453 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 27.48 SAFETY GLASSES 00005932 309937 9079556453 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 228.80 GLOVES 00001776 309938 9080192405 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,156.44 STORAGE CABINET 00005813 310098 9080840334 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 409.85- CREDIT 00005813 310099 9084978528 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,995.86 369237 311412013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 721.50 309974 149782 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,016.25 310050 149819 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,737.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 12 3114/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 369238 311412013 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 268.96 MOTOR DISCONNECTS 00001737 309800 105528 -1 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 268.96 369239 3/1412013 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,473.58 MAR 2013 310159 6225940 -3 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,473.58 369240 311412013 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,484.74 CHEMICALS 00005243 309801 3437321 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5,813.89 CHEMICALS 00005243 309939 3440637 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 766.92 CHEMICALS 00005243 310100 3441438 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 6,342.30 CHEMICALS 00005243 310160 3438371 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 17,407.85 369241 311412013 117186 HELGREN, ADAM 76.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 309862 030113 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 76.00 369242 311412013 102070 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLI 460.00 MEMBERSHIP 309863 2013 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 460.00 369243 311412013 100802 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 295.00 EMT REFRESHER COURSE 310011 27929 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 325.00 EMT REFRESHER COURSE 310012 27991 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,275.00 TEMPO EMT REFRESHER COURSES 310013 27993 140D.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 975.00 EMT REFRESHER COURSES 310103 27979 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,870.00 369244 311412013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 210.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 309940 1000026498 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 210.00 369245 311412013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 527.92 FEB 2013 BOOKING FEES 310014 1000028352 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 527.92 369246 311412013 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 310101 1000028298 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 310102 1000028297 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 320.62 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 13 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 540.50 309975 638063 5822.5514 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 309976 638259 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 247.50 309977 638267 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1 299 00 310051 637992 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 369247 3114/2013 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 3114/2013 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 341.22 FIRE INSPECTOR II TRAINING 310104 00285539 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 102.50 341.22 310015 D251228 -IN 1400.6406 369248 311412013 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 42.39 PAINT 00006151 309802 03045431 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 65.16 PAINT 00006157 309803 03046213 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 493.27 107.55 309804 74564 5910.6103 369249 3114/2013 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 13 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 540.50 309975 638063 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 990.00 309976 638259 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 247.50 309977 638267 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1 299 00 310051 637992 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3,077.00 369250 311412013 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 295.84 CONCESSION PRODUCT 309864 2049329 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 295.84 369251 3114/2013 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 102.50 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 310015 D251228 -IN 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 102.50 369252 3/1412013 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 493.27 MAIL LATE NOTICES 309804 74564 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 493.27 369263 3114/2013 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIAT 480.00 OFFICIATING FEES 309865 530 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ` 480.00 369254 311412013 130793 INSPEC 1,030.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 310105 212537 -3 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,030.00 369265 311412013 131687 IT'S TIME PUBLICATIONS LLC 895.00 FAMILY TIMES AD 310161 20771 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 895.00 369256 311412013 102136 JERRY S TRANSMISSION SERVICE ARENA CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 369257 311412013 369268 311412013 369269 311412013 369261 311412013 369262 311412013 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page- 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADAPTIVE RECREATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013. Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 41.84 THINNLITE BALLEST 00005973 309805 0020715 1553.6530 41.84 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 102146 JESSEN PRESS YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,487.70 AR &LE SPRING BROCHURE 310106 36595 1629.6575 1,487.70 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 172.20 310199 2057276 5842.5514 7,378.65 310200 2057275 5842.5514 7,550.85 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 37.41 ICE MELT 00006370 309941 63730221 5422.6406 37.41 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,329.01 310052 1517488 5862.5512 100.23 310053 1517490 5862.5512 2,871.61 310054 1517486 5862.5512 5.60 310055 1512218 5862.5513 1,349.32 310056 1517487 5862.5513 2,122.31 310057 1517489 5862.5513 1,482.22 310058 1517485 5862.5513 86.00- 310059 566540 5862.5513 29.12- 310060 565326 5862.5513 6.38- 310061 567350 5662.5513 3,248.76 310201 1517470 5822.5512 3,779.55 310202 1517484 5842.5512 560.10 310203 1517481 5842.5512 2,896.22 310204 1517475 5842.5513 20.99 310205 1517480 5842.5513 3,251.90 310206 1517479 5842.5513 73.12 310207 1517482 5842.5513 2,128.48 310208 1517483 5842.5513 1,967.45 310209 1517478 5842.5512 3,891.07 310210 1517477 5842.5512 223.36 310211 1517476 5842.5512 31,179.80 129405 KEY ELECTRIC LLC 1,425.00 WIRING FOR RESTROOMS 00002315 310107 030213 -02 5750.1720 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page- 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADAPTIVE RECREATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/14/2013 - 3/1412013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,425.00 369263 311412013 131680 KIRSCH, VICTOR 1,795.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 310016 QUINN KIRSCH 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,795.00 369264 3114/2013 106730 KJOS, PHIL 100.00 PIANO TUNING 310017 SENIOR CENTER 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1628.6103 5111.6406 5761.6530 5761.6530 5761.6180 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6556 1553.6530 1600.6575 1260.6406 421260.6710 129.00 35- 51278D2C11ADCD TRAINING 310019 KENNA DICK 1400.6104 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 15 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 369265 311412013 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 336.00 FEB/MAR SERVICE 310018 030113 336.00 369266 311412013 129813 LA VALLEUR, BARBARA 119.06 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 310111 030713 119.06 369267 3/1412013 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 309.52 REPAIR PARTS FOR TRACTOR 00002316 310108 254841 81.37 FILTERS 00002394 310109 255010 108.42 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 00002394 310110 255227 499.31 369268 311412013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 846.82 SCREWS, DRILL BITS, COUPLERS 00005912 309806 9301460847 890.03 LOCK NUTS, WASHERS, CLAMPS 00005924 309807 9301460848 87.39 DRILL BITS 00005921 309942 9301468507 46.72 PIPE FITTINGS 00005918 309943 9301464826 1,870.96 369269 311412013 128234 LEFFLER PRINTING COMPANY INC. 7,403.24 PARK & REC INSIDER 310112 17857 7,403.24 369270 311412013 113952 LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC. 222.54 LGO BASIC LICENSE 00002521 310113 93434181 13,615.88 CS15 DATA COLLECTOR 00002520 310162 93440776 13,838.42 369271 311412013 130106 LIFELINE TRAINING LTD 1628.6103 5111.6406 5761.6530 5761.6530 5761.6180 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6556 1553.6530 1600.6575 1260.6406 421260.6710 129.00 35- 51278D2C11ADCD TRAINING 310019 KENNA DICK 1400.6104 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 15 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG2000D CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 16 3/14/2013 -3/14/2013 Check # Dale Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 129.00 REGISTRATION 92- 512789A8DB411 310163 DEREK TOLL 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 258.00 369272 3/14/2013 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 600.28 LEG HANGERS, ASSEMBLY 00005961 309808 00050436 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.73 EARS 00005960 309809 00050424 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 461.51 TRUCK PLOW CYLINDER, SEAL KIT 00005999 309944 00050483 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 578.59 CARRIAGE ASSEMBLIES 00005967 309945 00050552 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,701.11 369273 311412013 101792 LUBE -TECH 420.13 DELO GREASE 00005934 309946 2176119 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 420.13 369274 311412013 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 554.19 BEARINGS, HOSE 309810 2131491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 441.70 MIRRORS 00005976 309811 2131537 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.26 , BEARING 309947 2131621 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 915.92 PUSH FRAME 00005800 310114 2131447 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 706.72 VEE PLOW PUSH FRAME 00005806 310115 2131497 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,638.79 369276 3/1412013 127698 MADD - MN 175.00 EHS TEEN SAFE DRIVING EVENT 310020 EDINPDI 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 175.00 369276 3/14/2013 131685 MAILFINANCE INC. 209.16 POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 310164 N3843676 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 209.16 369277 3114/2013 131681 MARCO INC. 1,539.45 PRINTER CONTRACT 310165 INV1320389 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,539.45 369278 3/14/2013 131672 MARTINSON, SCOTT 238.33 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309866 030513 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 238.33 369279 311412013 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 246.11 OXYGEN 00003649 309948 06520927 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 246.11 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3114/2013 —3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 369280 3114/2013 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 622.55 PAGING SETUP 310166 69540 1470.6180 622.55 369281 311412013 101483 MENARDS 38.38 GAP FILLER 00001739 310117 19268 1470.6530 38.38 369282 311412013 102602 METRO CASH REGISTER 48.10 RECEIPT PAPER 309867 73930 5510.6513 48.10 369283 311412013 100885 METRO SALES INC 140.00 PRINTER CLEANING 00008071 309812 145530 5511.6406 225.42 COPIER PART REPLACEMENT 310039 57767A 5841.6406 91.91 STAPLES FOR PRINTER 310167 55176A 1554.6406 457.33 369284 311412013 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 353,559.94 SEWER SERVICE 309868 0001011552 5922.6302 353,559.94 369285 311412013 104660 MICRO CENTER 32.05 LOGITEC MOUSE 00004308 310118 4337844 1553.6160 137.84 TOSHIBA 750 CANVIO PTB 310168 4315184 1554.6406 169.89 369286 3/1412013 102582 MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 400.00 PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION 310169 PLUMBING SYSTEM 47078.6710 400.00 369287 3/1412013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,347.50 STANDPIPE REPLACEMENT 00001790 310040 34316 5913.6180 1,347.50 369288 311412013 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 16,495.86 WATER PURCHASE 309869 431 - 0005.300 -31 5913.6601 13 16,495.86 369289 311412013 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 204.00 APSANNUALACCESS FEE 309870 400413003638 1400.6160 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATH CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER PURCHASED DATA PROCESSING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 311412013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 204.00 369290 311412013 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 600.00 POLICE INTERCEPTOR TRNG FEES 309871 675010000209 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 600.00 369291 311412013 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 42.75 WINDOW WASHING 310184 928008022 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 32.18 310185 928008023 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10.69 310186 928008337 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 85.62 369292 311412013 101154 MINNESOTA ASSOC OF WOMEN POLIC 235.00 CONFERENCE - JOY FRAGODT 310021 MAWP 2013 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 235.00 369293 3/1412013 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 32.00 C LICENSE EXAM 00001783 309949 NATE BEHLEN 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 32.00 369294 3/1412013 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 WATER LICENSE RENEWAL 00001787 309950 MARK JUNGWIRTH 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 23.00 369295 311412013 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 631.82 CS PARTS 00001766 309813 0295459 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 657.28 HYDRANT WRENCHES 00001766 309814 0295323 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,289.10 369296 311412013 101637 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 23.00 WW LICENSE RENEWAL 310022 MATT POYTHRESS 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 23.00 369297 3114/2013 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 713.00 MN PARENT AD 00009201 310116 140602 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 713.00 369298 3114/2013 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS 158.00 BEST PRACTICES WORKSHOP 310119 7650 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 158.00 369299 311412013 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 18 Business Unit TRAINING YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TRAINING TRAINING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION TRAINING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 52.19 ART CENTER POSTERS 309951 12947 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CUSTOMER REFUND REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 19 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 52.19 369300 311412013 131678 MOLLET, CYNDI 108.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 310023 4500 OAK DR 5900.2015 108.88 369301 3114/2013 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 115.29 MOTOR ASSEMBLY 00005051 309872 510720F6W 1553.6530 125.26 MOTORASSEMBLY 00005018 309873 510650F6W 1553.6530 240.55 369302 311412013 102308 MSANI 100.00 CAN-AM CONFERERNCE 310024 030713 1400.6104 100.00 369303 311412013 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 2,814.41 NARROW BAND 309952 888130 -00 5422.6406 2,814.41 369304 3114/2013 101575 MUNICIPALS 25.00 2013 MEMBERSHIP DUES 310170 031113 1550.6104 25.00 369305 311412013 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 97.50 310062 79753 5862.5513 97.50 369306 3/1412013 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 80.00 RANGE PASSES 309817 5025 7414.6406 80.00 369307 3114/2013 104350 NIKE USA INC. 127.50 MERCHANDISE 309874 948230365 5440.5511 514.29 309875 948230364 5440.5511 641.79 369308 311412013 131679 NORTHRUP, JEAN 22.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 310025 030513 1470.4329 22.00 369309 311412013 105007 NU- TELECOM CUSTOMER REFUND REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 19 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 20 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 566.67 MAR 2013 SERVICE 310026 80878858 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 566.67 369310 311412013 131670 OAK RIDGE WILDLIFE CONTROL 298.13 COYOTE CONTROL 309818 201313 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 298.13 369311 311412013 131686 ORION ISO 65.00 REFUND FOR CANCELLED PROGRAM 310171 JASMINE S 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 65.00 369312 3114/2013 129485 PAPCO INC. 123.17 TOWELS, CAN LINERS 309819 76855 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 123.17 369313 311412013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 958.63 309978 8390454 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,901.08 309979 8390458 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,204.32 309980 8390449 6-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 133.25 309981 8390464 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 133.25 310063 8390466 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 133.25 310212 8390463 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8,463.78 369314 3/14/2013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 405.10 309982 07807290 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 405.10 369315 3/14/2013 125978 PETSMART#459 87.94 K9 SUPPLIES 310027 T-8678 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 87.94 369316 311412013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 967.04 310064 2388095 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 170.08 310065 2388083 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,905.17 310066 2388097 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 45.99 310067 2384822 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,545.05 310068 2388096 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24 310069 2388082 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 486.90 310213 2388085 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 207.98 310214 2388084 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 49.12 310215 2388081 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/1312013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 21 3/14/2013 -3/14/20`13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,762.23 310216 2388089 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.12 310217 2388090 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 991.90 310218 2388092 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,232.00 310219 2388093 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 446.16 310220 2388094 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.36 310221 2388080 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3033.52 310222 2388091 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 178.06 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 309876 6224 PEACEDALE 5900.2015 AVE 14,905.86 369317 3/1412013 100119 PING 311412013 875.25 MERCHANDISE 310120 11652986 875.25 369318 311412013 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 030713 230.40 310223 17653 230.40 369319 3114/2013 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 142.50 STAFF PORTRAITS 309953 030413 706.91 142.50 00008054 369320 311412013 131064 POSCH, KATHY 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 178.06 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 309876 6224 PEACEDALE 5900.2015 AVE 1628.6235 5511.6511 5511.6406 5761.6511 5761.6406 1553.6406 CUSTOMER REFUND POSTAGE CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 178.06 369321 311412013 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 325.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 310028 030713 325.00 369322 311412013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 706.91 TISSUE, LINERS, TOWELS 00008054 309820 5918 566.20 ICE MELT FOR SIDEWALK 00008070 309821 6015 649.87 ICE MELT 00002314 310122 5940 724.71 TOWELS, TISSUE, CUPS 00002314 310123 5930 2,547.69 369323 311412013 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 235.11 READER 00005799 310121 62446 235.11 369324 311412013 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 1628.6235 5511.6511 5511.6406 5761.6511 5761.6406 1553.6406 CUSTOMER REFUND POSTAGE CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 22 3/14/2013 —3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 2,030.63 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 309954 1271 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,030.63 369325 311412013 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 1,023.97 EMULSION 310124 3621 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,023.97 369326 311412013 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 309955 452 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 110.49 00005189 309956 453 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 118.99 00005189 309956 453 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 150.00 00005189 309956 453 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 150.00 00005189 309956 453 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 679.48 369327 311412013 101902 RINK SYSTEMS INC 1,068.75 RINK GLASS 309822 1101536 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 1,068.75 369328 311412013 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 72,291.34 HORNETS NEST PROJECT 310125 1207021806 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 72,291.34 369329 311412013 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 48.05 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 309957 00280588 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 48.05 369330 311412013 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 208.88 SCRAPERS 00005166 309823 C62803 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 208.88 369331 311412013 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 309958 928690271 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.07 369332 3114/2013 131676 SAINTS COMMERCIAL FOOD SERVIC 193.14 COOKIES 310029 0072959-IN 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 193.14 369333 311412013 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 767.25 QUARTERLY BILLING 310126 8103392984 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 767.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 369334 311412013 103219 SGN WENDEL 7,064.87 COUNTRYSIDE SHELTER DESIGN 310127 3638 47078.671( 7,064.87 369335 311412013 120784 SIGN PRO 43.90 PRODUCT SIGNS 310041 6461 5842.6406 43.90 369336 311412013 131673 SILVER STAR INDUSTRIES . 77.63 FLOOR LINER 00005970 309877 BR- 1015080 -01 1553.6530 77.63 369337 311412013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 498.00 309983 1009136 5842.5513 3,837.00 309984 1009135 5842.5513 2,135.24 309985 1009138 5862.5512 1,541.04 309986 1009139 5862.5513 297.00 309987 1009137 5862.5513 5,710.39 309988 1009134 5842.5512 576.50 310224 1009133 5822.5513 650.00 310225 1009131 5822.5513 682.08 310226 1009132 5822.5512 15,927.25 369338 311412013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 217.93 PIPE, TOOLS 00001767 309824 52688665.001 5913.6406 241.61 PIPE 00001768 309825 S2688786.001 5913.6406 30.76 VALVE, SOLDER 00001772 309826 52689759.001 5913.6406 150.96 PVC, FITTINGS 00001750 309827 S2690665.3001 5913.6406 33.67 PIPE 00001724 309959 52686765.001 5913.6406 674.93 369339 311412013 105842 STAR EQUIPMENT INC. 236.53 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 310030 713800 5861.6180 236.53 369340 311412013 131690 STOER23NGER, SHELAGH 6.00 PARKING FEE 310172 031113 1190.6107 35.00 REPORT GRADING FEE 310172 031113 1190.6104 41.00 Subledger Account Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 23 Business Unit COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATH YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 369341 311412013 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 378.40 VEHICLE REPAIR 309960 625185 1553.6180 378.40 369342 3114/2013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 45.47 PUBLISH NOTICE 310128 1426409 1120.6120 174.83 AD FOR BID 310129 1426408 1120.6120 179.82 AD FOR BID 310130 1426407 1120.6120 400.12 369343 3114/2013 103964 SWANSON, MICHAEL 15.00 CLASS A DRIVERS LICENSE 309878 022613 1280.6105 15.00 369344 311412013 104932 TAYLOR MADE 1,541.75- CREDIT 310132 19710439 5440.5511 82.22 STAFF SHIRTS 310133 19200677 5410.6406 239.27 MERCHANDISE 310134 19224497 5440.5511 163.86 MERCHANDISE 310135 19238138 5440.5511 340.75 MERCHANDISE 310136 19253881 5440.5511 1,322.22 MERCHANDISE 310137 19245642 5440.5511 606.57 369345 311412013 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 137.30 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 309879 022813 1140.6107 137.30 369346 3114/2013 111002 TEE JAY NORTH INC. 248.14 DOOR REPAIRS _ 310031 19170 5861.6180 248.14 369347 311412013 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 309828 2013 -88735 5822.6122 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 309828 2013 -88735 5842.6122 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 309828 2013 -88735 5862.6122 990.00 369348 311412013 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 1,597.79 SNOW BUCKET 309880 215962PC 1553.6585 1,597.79 369349 311412013 101474 TITLEIST 3113/2013 7:55:15 Page - 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 25 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 230.00 GOLF BALLS 310138 1341021 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 230.00 369350 311412013 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 1,830.24 BRIDGE INSPECTION 310139 002013000390 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,830.24 369351 3114/2013 131040 TLO LLC 111.25 FEB 2013 USAGE 310032 269634 -3/13 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 111.25 369352 311412013 120595 T MOBILE 32.63 SURVEY PHONE 310131 477067848 -2/13 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 32.63 369353 311412013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 33.22 WELDING TANKS 00002313 310140 457103 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 37.97 WELDING GAS 310141 457102 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.19 369354 311412013 117176 TONKA EQUIPMENT COMPANY 566.58 GASKETS 00001728 309961 1001692 -IN 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 566.58 369355 311412013 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 5.30 BACKGROUND CHECKS 310173 02319047 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5.30 369356 311412013 103048 U.S. BANK 425.00 PAYING AGENT 309881 3339939 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 402.50 PAYING AGENT 309882 3338323 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 431.25 PAYING AGENT 309883 3339446 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 431.25 PAYING AGENT 309884 3339445 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 425.00 PAYING AGENT 309885 3339941 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 2,115.00 369357 311412013 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) 124.44 DRILL RENTAL 00001741 309829 109322792 -001 5913.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL DISTRIBUTION 124.44 369358 311412013 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 15.66 SHIPPING FEES 310174 TRAN:0739 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page.- 26 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 31.33 310175 TRAN:8146 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 13.20 310176 TRAN:7051 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 24.93 310235 TRAN:3515 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 8.85 310236 TRAN:1176 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 10.85 310237 TRAN:6483 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 36.07 310238 TRAN:5821 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 13.38 310239 TRAN:3986 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 13.60 310240 TRAN:9179 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 9.92 310241 TRAN:5894 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 24.41 310242 TRAN:5009 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 13.83 310243 TRAN:2823 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 9.69 310244 TRAN:5011 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20.45 310245 TRAN:3381 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 246.17 369359 3/14/2013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 702.73 LIQUOR BAGS, TISSUE, LINERS 309830 265804 -00 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 220.02 LIQUOR BAGS 00007511 309831 265806 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 55.58 CAN LINERS 00001718 309886 264929 -00 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 16.82 PLATES, UTENSILS 00007513 310042 262943 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 310.50 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 310042 262943 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 3.69 FORKS 310043 262943 -01 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 69.08- CREDIT 310044 265164CM 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,240.26 369360 3/14/2013 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 543.46 CART CHARGER 00001731 309832 22513006 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 772.35 STARTER, BRUSHES 00006372 309962 22013005 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 314.92 STEERING BOX ASSEMBLY 00006373 309963 22513064 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 237.19 BELTS 00006373 309964 22713005 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 119.42 PARTS FOR GOLF CART 00002305 310142 22113001 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,987.34 369361 3/14/2013 102571 VGM CLUB 160.00 190035 DUES 309965 535528 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 160.00 369362 311412013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 254.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001719 309833 7095471 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 183.77 WIRE 00001730 309834 7106549 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 836.32 WIRE 00001746 310033 7117341 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 81.40 HOLE CUTTERS, PLIERS 00001756 310143 7121098 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 27 3/14/2013 -- 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger- Account Description Business Unit 1,355.99 369363 3114/2013 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 52.84 SAFETY GLASSES 00005933 310144 318204 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 52.84 369364 311412013 119464 VINOCOPIA 128.86 309989 0073333 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 626.67 310227 0073330 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 103.50 310228 0073329 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 859.05 369365 3/14/2013 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 69.58 CONCESSION PRODUCT 309835 35970612 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 80.36 309836 35970610 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 416.83 309837 35953441 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 566.77 369366 311412013 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 174.83 LIGHT BULBS 310045 15221397 -00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 174.83 369367 311412013 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT3 /21/13 309966 022213 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 369368 3114/2013 131671 WALSH, SEAN 10.84 OVERPAID SOFTBALL REGISTRATION 309887 REFUND 4077.4390 REGISTRATION FEES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 10.84 369369 3114/2013 131648 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. 672.00 TOWNHOMES TRAFFIC STUDY 310177 1300726 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 672.00 369370 3114/2013 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT COMPANY 237.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 309888 1139 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 237.00 369371 311412013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 374.30 309990 324107 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 902.65 309991 324106 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 494.62 310229 323993 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/14/2013 — 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 28 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5862.5513 1,771.77 VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 369372 311412013 5862.5513 101312 WINE MERCHANTS VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,284.83 5842.5515 310070 446315 5862.5513 - 31.19 VERNON SELLING 310071 446314 VERNON SELLING 3.36- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 310072 60079 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,620.56 5822.5512 310230 446313 5842.5514 3,933.22 YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 369373 3/1412013 5842.5515 117462 WINECONNECT INC. YORK SELLING 159.24 WEB- MAR 2013 309838 1078 159.24 369374 3/14/2013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 7,340.45 309992 1080010976 3,170.53 309993 1080010975 3,222.44 309994 1080010981 8,174.40 309995 1080010980 102.35 309996 1080010982 730.35 310073 1080010574 80.00- 310074 875744 29.34- 310075 878083 1,033.78 310231 1080010979 773.52 310232 1080010978 24,438.48 369375 3/14/2013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,779.40 309997 1090012571 112.00 309998 1090012572 43.00 309999 1090012573 2,934.40 369376 3114/2013 102784 WORLDPOINT ECC INC. 439.55 ACLS TEXTBOOKS 00003592 310145 5320635 439.55 369377 311412013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 29,071.85 FRANCE AVE PED CROSSINGS 309839 10 -01686 -300 590.43 TRACYAVEIMPROVEMENTS 309840 15 -01686 -250 1,082.46 TRACYAVEIMPROVEMENTS 309840 15- 01686 -250 1,574.48 TRACYAVEIMPROVEMENTS 309840., 15- 01686-250 3,982.13 TRACYAVEIMPROVEMENTS 309840 15- 01686 -250 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Page - 28 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1470.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 01404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 05526.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TRACYAVE 03472.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TRACYAVE 04388.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TRACYAVE 01368.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3113/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 29 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 232.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 309841 41 -Q1686 -020 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,627.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 309841 41- 01686 -020 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 39,160.35 369378 311412013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 140.28 51- 5938955 -6 309889 359302616 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 40.18 51- 8102668 -0 309890 359147391 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,815.77 515547446 -1 309891 359112125 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 10,084.13 51- 9603061 -0 309892 359171099 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 96.39 51- 6692497 -0 309893 359128907 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 1,130.72 51- 9251919 -0 309894 359356390 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 275.46 51- 6046826 -0 309895 359304576 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 23.16 51- 4151897 -6 309896 359620959 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 42.33 51- 7567037 -0 309897 359662962 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 533.76 51- 9422326 -6 309898 359849565 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,116.07 51- 6979948 -4 309899 359819735 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,475.30 51- 6979948 -4 309899 359819735 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,782.16 51- 69799484 309899 359819735 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 2,249.54 514159265 -8 309900 358751300 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 647.85 51- 6229265 -9 309901 359308168 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,786.38 51- 6229265 -9 309901 359308168 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,279.67 51- 08375484 309967 359716120 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 760.31 51- 5634814 -2 309968 359634749 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 6,288.12 51- 6955679 -8 310178 360352244 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 4,914.24 51- 6824328 -7 310179 360181453 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 21,130.55 514888627 -1 310180 359962773 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 218.00 51- 9337452 -8 310181 358979963 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 61,830.37 369379 3/1412013 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 214.05 FEB 2013 USAGE 00004322 310034 066712123 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 214.05 369380 3/1412013 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 13,066.40 DIESEL FUEL 00005800 309842 542876, 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13,066.40 369381 3/1412013 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 518.00 310000 11806 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 518.00 369382 3/1412013 101091 ZIEGLER INC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/13/2013 7:55:15 Council Check Register Page - 30 3/14/2013 — 3/14/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 82.70 HOSE, COUPLINGS 00005052 309843 PCO01448924 1553.6530 _REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,557.79 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 310182 K39938012 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,574.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 310246 SW000168621 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 993.81 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 310247 SW000168628 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5,208.81 974,620.95 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 974,620.95 Total Payments 974,620.95 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 127,466.39 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 833.75 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 425.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 43,988.59 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 14,759.94 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,991.74 06400 GOLF COURSE FUND 30,153.71 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 102,430.66 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 34,411.03 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,538.55 05800 LIQUOR FUND 147,132.94 05900 UTILITY FUND 413,905.79 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,882.61 05950 RECYCLING FUND 34,192.80 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 6,406.87 09232 CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 2,627.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,473.58 Report Totals 974,620.95 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 3/14/2013 - 3/14/2013 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policigs a9d procedures 3113/2013 7:57:17 Page - 1 To: Mayor and City Council From: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director Date: March 19, 2013 Subject: Request for Purchase — 2013 PV5 Grand Caravan Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: March 8, 2013 Company: Dodge of Burnsville Recommended Quote or Bid: Dodge of Burnsville w91�' ow e JCn v � �o • ,nCORPOPULS11 • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV.C. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: Amount of Quote or Bid: $20,880 (State contract) General Information: The Communications & Technology Services Department's 2004 Crown Victoria is scheduled for replacement this year. Because the department's new mobile video production system will not fit in.a sedan and because a sedan is not ideal for transporting personal computers and other pieces of technology, staff recommends the purchase of a seven - passenger Dodge Grand Caravan with State contract pricing. The vehicle will be paid for out of the department's Equipment Replacement Fund. Equipment Operations Supervisor Greg Bretson of the Public Works Department, Video Production Coordinator Scott Denfeld and I.T. Specialist Nick Lovejoy recently test drove a Grand Caravan and verified that the vehicle will meet the department's needs and that its equipment will fit inside. The minivan will be one of the few in the City's fleet large enough to transport small groups and will be made available to other departments and groups as needed. Once the van is delivered in 90 to 120 days, the Crown Victoria will be turned over to the Public Works Department for auction in the future. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and Council From: Jeff Long, Chief of Police Date: 03/19/2013 Subject: Purchase of Evidentiary Recording System and Server. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 02/12/2013 Company: WHP Workflow Solutions (IRSA Video) U O Le v � �y hc�RPO�`�6 ie�t8 Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: 12/31/2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $89,521.11 Recommended Quote or Bid: WHP Workflow Solutions (IRSA Video) MN -State of Minnesota(WSCA/NASPO) Contract # 14279 General Information: The replacement of 15 in -squad video systems, audio /video recording equipment for four interview rooms, and HP server. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: March 19, 2013 • •,v va. �RYOt�`K� tBBB Agenda Item #: IV. E. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Award of Bid - Contract ENG 13 -1 Mendelssohn A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: March 11, 2013 Company: Palda & Sons, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Midwest Asphalt Corporation Hardrives, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Palda & Sons, Inc. Bid or Expiration Date: May 11, 2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $1,233,546.04 $1,238,772.51 $1,255,231.75 $1,486,806.62 $1,233,546.04 General Information: This project includes the roadways of Belmore Ln, Grove PI, John St, Kresse Cir, Maloney Ave and Spruce Rd. The project involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer system, upgrades to fire hydrants, curb and gutter spot repair, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement. The project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the December 11, 2012 Public Hearing. This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. At this point in the process we are anticipating the special assessments to be reduced by approximately 22% to $12,500, versus the $16,150 that was discussed at the project hearing. The City funded costs also saw approximately 26% reduction. These values can change based on construction related items such as soil corrections and turf restoration. The final special assessments will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing. Turf restoration for all of the 2013 projects will be hydro- seeded versus sodded. See attached memo discussing the selection of hydro- seeding as the turf restoration technique. Staff recommends awarding the project to Palda and Sons, Inc. utilizing hydro -seed for turf establishment. Attachments: Turf Establishment in Reconstruction Projects GAPMCENTRAL SVMENG DIVIPROJECTMONTRACTSUOMENG 13 -I Mendelssohn A\ADMIN\MISC11tem W.E. ENG 13 -I Mendelssohn RFP.dooc City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Y Engineering Department - Phone 952 - 826 -0371 I Fax 952 - 826 -0392 - www.CityofEdina.com MEMO Date: March 5, 2013 To: Mayor and City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Re: Turf Establishment in Reconstruction Projects Summary: Staff is recommending the use of hydro -seed for the 2013 projects with a revised contractor maintenance period of 90 -days. Staff feels hydro -seed will better meet the long term needs of the property owners for turf establishment and at the same time reduce special assessment amounts. Background Information: Lawns disturbed by roadway construction have typically been restored with the use of sod. The contractor was responsible for the establishment of sod for a period of 6 weeks (42 days) from the date of installation. After the 6 week maintenance period the property owner is then responsible for the sod. During 2012, residents and staff noticed portions of the sod installed during the 2011 construction season were not healthy. 2012 saw drought conditions for most of the year. Most of the new sod areas were brown and dormant and /or dead. This reflects badly on the construction project even though continued maintenance of the sod is the responsibility of the homeowner. Staff hosted a "Construction Contractor Think Tank" meeting. The goal of this meeting was to determine the advantages and disadvantage of sod and hydro- seeding. We wanted a turf product that property owners could perform the proper maintenance on to establish long lasting turf. Staff invited industry experts for this meeting held on January 7, 2013 at the Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility. Attendees included turf experts, contractors, and consultants familiar with City of Edina practices and clients. Topics discussed included watering, maintenance periods, proper long term care, turf color, installation techniques, drought, fertilizer, chemical treatments, equipment, installation dates and foot traffic. The 2013 bid documents require the Contractor to place 6- inches of topsoil in a level and smooth manner free of stones or other debris that are over 1.5- inches in diameter. Seed, fertilizer, and soil stabilizer is placed in a uniform manner. The Contractor is responsible for mowing the new turf during the maintenance period. The quality of the turf establishment is reviewed after the maintenance period. If the maintenance period does not end by Nov. I, the remaining balance of the maintenance will carry over and begin on April 15 of the following year. Any turf areas' deemed unacceptable at the end of the maintenance period will be re- hydro- seeded at no cost to the City. Staff realizes that resident education and communications is a key component in the establishment of turf using either method; sod or hydro -seed. Construction update letters and City Extra a -mails will Engineering Department - 7450 Metro Blvd - Edina, MN 55439 MEMO o • �s�hmbS�MSS�n be used to educate the residents on proper maintenance procedures. Turf maintenance is the responsibility of the property owner after the 90 -day turf maintenance period. Table I. Comparison of Sod and Hydro -Seed Item Sod Hydro -Seed Cost $5.00 - $6.00 / SY 25 -50% less than sod Water Equal Equal Drought Resistance Less than seed Tolerant of dry conditions Maintenance Identified by Property Owner Appears complete, less realization of maintenance needs Maintenance needs are apparent Color Some issues, defined line between new and existing turf Tends to blend with existing . turf Appearance Appears instant Established over time Installation Labor intensive Simple Installation Dates Not recommended during July / early August but can be accomplished Not recommended from June I until July 20 but can be accomplished Installation Maintenance Period 90 days recommended 90 days recommended Foot Traffic Not an issue As little as possible until germination Repairs — Cost $5.00 - $6.00 / SY 25 -50% less than sod Repairs — Installation Labor intensive Simple Repairs — Disturbance Some Minimal Environmental Footprint Sod is planted off -site, harvested, transported, and replanted. Hydro -seed is planted on -site and remains on -site. Based on a research with other communities that use hydro -seed and experience on the West 44th Street project and on information learned from the "Think Tank" session, staff is recommending the use of hydro -seed on the 2013 projects with a revised maintenance period of 90 -days. Staff feels hydro -seed will better meet the long term turf needs of the property owners. \IEd- nt8lengpubwks%PWICENTRAL SVCSIENG DIIAPROJECTSICONTRACTSU013XENG 13.1 Mendelssohn AWDMINIMISCLSod Seed Mtg120130227 WH Memo Turf Est In Recon Prol.do« Engineering Department - 7450 Metro Blvd - Edina, MN 55439 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ' A Z�N owe ,. ) • ,�CORPOTiAT�O • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. F. The Recommended Bid is From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering ❑x Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: March 19, 2013 Subject: Award of Bid - Contract ENG 13 -9 Raw Water Line On Vernon Avenue Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: March 11, 2013 Company: GM Contracting, Inc. Penn Contracting, Inc. Ellingson Drainage, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: GM Contracting, Inc. Bid or Expiration Date: May 11, 2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $188,557.88 $192,687.00 $219,349.75 $188,557.88 General Information: This project will construct a raw water main along Vernon Avenue from Hansen Road to Sherwood Rd connecting to existing segments. This segment of raw water main was part of a larger project listed in the CIP for 2014 but due to a proposed 2013 street pavement mill and overlay project by Hennepin County, staff is recommending this work be completed by June 28, 2013. The remainder of the project to connect Well No. 15 located at Mirror Lakes Drive and Interlachen Boulevard and Well No. 9 located at Hansen Road and Benton Avenue to the new water treatment plant located in the lower level of the Grandview Parking Ramp will be completed in 2014. Staff recommends awarding the project to GM Contracting, Inc. Attachments: None GAPWICENTRAL SVCS%ENG DIVIPROJECTSICONTRACTS120131ENG 13 -9 Raw Water Line on Vernon Ave1ADMINU-11SCUtenn IV.F. ENG 13 -9 Raw Water RFP.dooc City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 a To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL A Oi \roRPBB f+ 1B Agenda Item #: IV. G. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: March 19, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Traffic Safety Report Of February 6, 2013 Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of February 6, 2013. Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the February 6, 2013, Traffic Safety Committee Report at their February 21 meeting and did not have any comments regarding this report. Attachments: Traffic Safety Committee Report of February 6, 2013 Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of February 21, 2013 G:\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports \Item IV. E. Traffic Safety of December 12, 2012.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Byron Theis — Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: February 21, 2013 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of February 6, 2013 Action Requested: None. trTA. H� Agenda Item #: VI. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) did not receive any traffic safety matters for review; therefore, only Section D is included in this report. Section D shows traffic safety issues that were resolved over the phone or referred to others for resolution. Attachments: Traffic Safety Review for February 6, 2013. G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \Staff Review Summaries \13 TSAC & Min \02 -06- 13.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Wednesday, February 6, 2013 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) did not meet this month. The Committee did not receive any traffic safety matters for review; therefore, only Section D is included in this report. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. Residents with disabled child signs were contacted to see if the signs were still needed. It was determined that all disabled children signs are still needed. 2. Call from a resident concerned with speeds in the area of 60th Street West and Kellogg Avenue. Resident stated that vehicles are going "too fast" for the area. The resident was informed that a speed count would be conducted as soon as the weather permits the placement of traffic counters (in the spring) and the speed data would be sent to Edina Police Department for enforcement. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page I of I February 6, 2013 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM FEBRUARY 21, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF JAN. 17, 2013 The following correction was made: page 1, Traffic Safety Comm ittee,Report of Jan. 2, 2013, last sentence 'Member Janovy said she appreciated the analysis and that she was "comfortable with the yield sign as proposed in the report;' page 3, last sentence, change.$22,000 to $20,000. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Franzen to approve the revised minutes of Jan. 17, 2013. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT Constance and Eric Fantin, 6033 Kellogg "Ave; commented on the request to install stop signs at Kellogg & 61St. Ms. Fantin said they live four houses from Kellogg & 61St, and currently, there is a yield sign on Kellogg while 61St is a thru street. She said the street,'is'one block'from Valley View Road, the ice cream shoppe and Pamela Park and it is busy with cars, walkers, and bikers: She's . aid they witnessed two accidents last summer at the intersection.. She said she was in. attendance on "behalf of the neighborhood to address their concerns of speeding; cut thru traffic to avoid .:Valley View & Wooddale intersection, yield sign ignored and not respected, and rolling stops at, stop signs. She said they feel the best solution is stop signs instead of yield signs tG give clear signal of where to stop REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS. Traffic Safety Committee Report of Jan. 2, 2013 (Re- Review) Chair Nelson said they are revisiting this because staff did not talk with the neighborhood. He said there were two motor vehicle, accidents last year but warrants are still not met for a stop sign (warrants are three accidents within one year)., Discussion included the following: • There are stop signs at all but a few intersections in the neighborhood; • Director Houle said there probably wasn't a lot of traffic and no interest in having stop signs at the few uncontrolled intersections; o From looking at data, the road to control is 61St; most existing stop signs probably do not meet warrants; bigger concern is when signs are placed haphazardly; complete basket weave; • Reluctant to find a response that overrides the data; real issue and concerns by neighbors; placing so many signs creates speeding, cut -thru; • Would City consider a traffic circle to minimize cut -thru? Director Houle said two were placed on W. 54th as part of the bike boulevard project and responses have been minimal; • Does staff hear from neighbors that drivers are rolling through stop signs? 0 • A new request was received recently for a 4 -way stop sign at 60th & Kellogg. • Some issues are that Kellogg is one block from Wooddale; close to Pamela Park that generates traffic in the summer; and no sidewalks; • Conducting a traffic calming study was suggested; • What is the down -side if two stops signs that do not meet warrants are installed? • Counts indicate most vehicles are travelling northbound on Kellogg; replace yield signs with stop signs to complete the basket weave; • Can they do a pilot /test program? Director Houle said they would need to identify the criteria they are testing because speeding is not an issue. He said if the ETC and City Council authorizes the stop sign he will support it but his recommendation is based on engineering standards that are in place. • Concerned with a pilot program and cautioned against doing -one; • Thinking too hard on this issue; there are existing stop;signs that do not meet warrants; these would complete the basket weave; • Consider turn restriction at Valley View if there -are cut thru `traffic in the evenings but would also impact local traffic; • Will be talking about a stop sign at 61St and Oaklawn after it becomes.the new cut thru; • Making more and more exceptions; would like to defer to engineering recommendations but at the same time, need to address the concerns; • Director Houle suggested meeting with the neighborhood t get their feedback on turn restriction; he said when the intersection at Valley View /Oaklawn /62nd was realigned, the feedback from residents was that traffic was being pushed pass their property and feedback will be the same from this neighborhood; • Mrs. Fantin said she is strongly in favor,of the stop signs because they slow traffic and replaces a dangerous intersection; there are only two intersections with yields signs and drivers do not know what to do at yield signs; drivers.are used to stop signs; simply switching would make speed faster; the most amount of traffic is on" Kellogg going northbound; do not want to hear about changes on 61St because it would become worst; neighbors"' have already asked about a 4 -way stop sign at 60th & Kellogg and also a stop'sign at 61St &.Oaklawn; • Looking at everythirig;,the only reason fora stop sign is that it was requested; there is no data to base-it on; drivers go through stop'signs all the time; cannot support a stop sign on Kellogg; • Liked the traffic circle concept but do not know cost; • Make decision based on data and let City Council make the decision of exception; Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member LaForce to recommend to the City Council to reverse the ETC's previous recommendation of moving the yield sign to 61st; and recommend they 11 . leave the intersection as is so that they can explore another traffic calming measure like a traffic circle. Discussion: Would they explore traffic calming at this intersection only or all intersections? Director Houle said the neighborhood is about 8 -10 blocks with collector streets all around it and a park on one side and this summer they could study the area when there are activities at the park. The motion was amended to include adding a sign to the yield sign, in the interim, that 'cross traffic does not stop' and to study the 8 -10 block area this summer. 2 Discussion: • Is adding a sign to a yield sign allowed? Staff will check to see if this is allowed.. Aye: Bass, LaForce, lyer, Nelson, Braden Nay: Franzen, Janovy, Whited. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Committee Report of Feb. 6. 2013 Director Houle said the TSC did not meet because there was no business to discuss. Member LaForce asked if the reports are smaller because it is winter and Director Houle said yes, they do not generally get too many requests and they also cannot collect data in the winter. France Avenue Pedestrian Enhancement Project Update Director Houle said March 31 is the deadline for all agencie final approval. He said Andy Plowman with WSB would give an update on the geometrics of the project, and Michael Schroeder with LH "B, would give an update on the landscaping. j Mr. Plowman explained that the project include intersection improvements, sidewalk on the eastside, narrowing of lanes and landscaping. Some of the features are: . • Enhanced pedestrian crosswalks. (zebra striped, thermal plastic in -laid in the asphalt); • Biscuit planters at the corner of intersections for pedestrian safety as they wait to cross ( planters height range from 4 -7 inches and will,be planted with 2 ft.,tall daylilies); • Traffic signal improvements (pedestrian` /bike phasing and video.;detection); • Southdale entrance /exit will narrow up free- right, eliminated; and adding a crosswalk that was requested by Sdu#h'dale management; • All pedestrian ramps will be incompliance with public accessibility guidelines (above ADA requirements); • Byerly's:site.'is.being redeveloped aridihe- agreement is to have the sidewalk along their property cor66 up on top of•th'e retaining;wall; this is,riot in the City's plan yet because Byerly's is still developing their site plan;. • Cost is $27M, not including landscaping; • Schedule is Mar Ito complete right -of -way acquisitions; Mar 31 approved for bid; June -Sept. construction;'- Urban Design Mr. Schroeder said the challenge to them was to overlay an urban design for the corridor on to improvements that are being made in a limited portion of the corridor. He said they focused on things related to pedestrian enhancements, directives to encourage movements at designated crossings and along the corridor and to find ways to work with the private sector to get pedestrians safely across parking lots and to the corridor. Mr. Schroeder said he wants to make sure everyone understands what urban design is. He said trees, biscuit planters, etc. is not urban design; these are things that they are putting in the corridor. He said urban design is about patterns, connections, reflections and an identity that people have with where they live and work. He cautions against spending money and not getting what they want. 3 Continuing, Mr. Schroeder said they have not had a chance to frame the larger opportunities because they have been focused on meeting the requirements of the money for this improvement. He said the struggle is that France Ave is different as you move along the corridor - buildings facing different directions, limited space in right -of -ways (ROW), Centennial Lakes lost its three block signature when the trees were removed from the mid -block so they could see to the front of stores, etc. He said if the idea is to have a signature for the corridor, they need to be bold and aggressive and he suggested expanding to include motorists and not just pedestrians because most users of the corridor will continue to be motorists. He said everything they are doing works to build on something bigger but they do not know what that is yet. 31ong block signature — mid block trees were cut down so that they could see to the front of the stores He proposed creating the France Avenue Working Group to def. e if ne future patterns that build from the current project. He said members would be the ETC, Planning Commission, Energy & Environmental Commission, City Council, and business and residential property owners. He said if they agree to the working group, he would create work plan for the ETC to- review. He'said further that the process would be similar to the one used for the Grandview Square•Small /Area Study (on "a much smaller scale) where they agreed to a set of principles for the area. Meetings" ould be scheduled in•March /April /May. Director Houle said if they agree to the working group, the meeting schedule would fit; because he is planning on bidding the landscaping portion separately in June /July and the, plantings would "be•done in 2014. After discussion, the consensus was to move forward with the" working group. Director Houle will work with Chair Nelson to arrange special meetings. The ETC will be invited and whoever is available to attend can do so (attendance is not mandatory). Di "rector Houle will notify the chair of the other boards and commissions, including the:.Park >I36ard. Updates - Student Members None. Bike,Edina Task Force Received minutes "of Dec. 13, 2012., No further updates. Living Streets Working Group Chair Nelson said he, member Janovy and past member Michael Thompson met several times and worked on the draft policy. He said Mr. Thompson provided the content, while member Janovy did the editing. He thanked them for all their work. Member Janovy said the city of Maple Grove, where Mr. Thompson works, adopted their Living Streets Policy this past January. She said in writing Edina's Living Streets Policy, since there was no funding" available, they pulled from the work that BARR and HR Green did, policies from the city of Maple Grove and Los Angeles County, and input from the workshop last year. She said they are looking for feedback and the next step is for assistant city manager Karen Kurt to take the lead and circulate the draft policy to staff, boards and commissions for review and at some point there will be a public process. 4 Discussion included: • Adding a map to show where sidewalks are going in. Director Houle said he could do a concept map but did not have staff to do a detailed map at this time; or he could consult it out. • Adding a definition that explains why some parks were not included so as not to cause alarm. • Any street is an option for sidewalk even if not currently marked for sidewalk. • Member Janovy will edit and forward the draft policy to assistant city manager Kurt. Ms. Kurt is planning on attending the March ETC meeting. • Director Houle will work on the bike map as well as the functional classification map. Transportation Options Working Group Chair Nelson said the thought is to move forward with the Senior Transportation Option Study but he is not sure how to do this. Director Houle said they need to define wbat they are asking for. Member Janovy asked if the recommendation was to bring Prism /VEAP into Edina: and member Whited said yes. Member Whited said she is considering applying for a Human Services grant from Edina. Member Janovy asked if she is looking for a resolution of support and membe'r..Whited said yes.. Member Bass suggested a letter writing campaign to show support in combination with resolution from the.ETC. Member Janovy said there are other issues that the`group could work on such as how the infrastructure is serving people to help address other transportation options, not;just seniors and those with disabilities. Member Bass suggested exploring mobility, by other modes by the same senior folks, e.g. in their scooter or wheelchair. Member Whited said she is working on.an initiative with Ms. Melton that may be a good fit. Member Whited will write a recommendation. Communications Committee .. ' a. Website Feedback' Member LaForce said they <reviewed theIransportatio website from the perspective of a resident looking for information on sidewalks,"ROW, 0, ans.for bike trails; etc. and they consolidated their responses in the handout. Engineering specialist Sharon Allison:said she.reviewed the recommendations and have already began working on some of their recommendation' ns. ' Member LaForce said their recommendation is to make it easy for residents to find the information that they are looking for, e.g. under For Residents on the front page ad d:a link to the Transportation webpage. b. ETC Communication Committee Recommendations Member LaForce said they talked about what they should do — provide text, content, create communication pieces, etc. and then they realized their charge is to make recommendations because there is a professional communications staff. He said their recommendation is what staff should be working on and the big topics now are Franc Ave, Safe Routes to Schools, and Living Streets. He said the communication plan should make it easy to find answers to why, who, when, and finding better and effective ways to communicate messages on things like the purpose of the ROW, multi -modal approach, etc. Member LaForce said if these are things that the ETC supports the recommendation would be passed on to staff and the City Council. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member lyer that the ETC adopts the Communications Committee Recommendations dated Feb. 21, 2013, and forward it to the City Council. Chair Nelson asked what the committee will do moving forward and member La Force said primarily provide reaction or feedback to staff. All voted aye. Motion carried. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues Director Houle said there was an informative presentation on Tuesday night at the City Council meeting on airport noise and he recommended that the ETC watch the video.',;;. Member Janovy said there were two letters about the franchise :fees and it seems there is a high level of misunderstanding of how this was done. She said she recalled..tlie City Manager saying that Edina is one of the few cities that was not charging a franchise fee and Edina's"fee is lower than other cities. She asked if they could get this information. y B. Development Projects Update and Airport Noise Update — See memo from Cary Teague Director Houle said Mr. Teague will be updating the ETG on development projects from now on. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Whited asked about Xerxes Avenue near Crosstown where the striping between the parking and driving lane is no longer visible. Director Houle said Hennepin County will be restriping the area this spring. Member Whited said the Met Council released funding that Would fit With what they do but she would not be able to write a grant. Director Houle said it istkter to have" a' pj.an in place when applying for a grant because it is expensive to pay a consultant to write, one ($20- $30,000). He said grants of $1M and up is worth the time and expense. Member Bass said as the project manager for do.town, they hosted a telephone townhall meetings last month for the cities of Bloomington, Edina and Richfield and Edina's call was on Jan. 15. She said it was an opportunity for the Mayor to talk, With residents about a vision for a community that supports healthy choices including things like access to healthy,foods and walkable /bikeable changes. She said the call went out to 9,600 registered land lines and 2,600 listened to portions of the call and some for the full 40 minutes. There were 30 questions posed by residents and the Mayor answered 10. She said majority of the questions had to do with safety and getting around by walking /biking; and many were women bikers. A poll was taken and from four options, most said they would get involved with walkable /bikeable neighborhood (39 %). She said this is good indication for broad support of multi -modal transportation and the work that the ETC is doing. Member Bass said the Blue Cross support to do.town is coming to a close at the end of March and on Mar. 16 they are having a Champion Summit at the Works in Bloomington from 10 -2:30 p.m. and all are invited to attend. Member lyer said he and Bill Sierks wrote a couple grants that were approved for the City. He said Mr. Sierks identified the opportunities ahead of time so they could react. 0 Member Janovy noted that there was a letter to the City Council regarding heavy trucks wreaking the streets and she said it sounds like an educational opportunity. Director Houle said staff is working on a memo to City Council to address this in a general manner. He said garbage trucks are more damaging to the roadway than a typical home reconstruction project. Additional comments were: Having an approach to the traffic concerns that will generate at Hello Pizza; Sunken pavement at Inglewood & Grimes where the City did work last year; Green bike paint wearing off (Director Houle said this is not uncommon —they are repainted every year); • A bill was introduced to remove prohibition against talking about the Dan Patch corridor; consensus is that the ETC will follow this bill; • Federal money available through MNDOT for places that Have accidents and she suggested the area at Crosstown and France. Chair Nelson said over the last few days, he assisted the City Council "with interviews for new boards and commission members. He said there were at least 5 %applicants and 10 X12 were interested in the ETC and 3 -4 ranked it as their priority. He said it was refreshing to see all the people wanting to help.. Additional comments were: • Reminder to sign up for the Annual.Dinner Meeting of.Boards and Commissions at Braemar, Mar. 11, 5:00 p.m. and the 34th Annual'Volunteer.Recognition Reception at Braemar, Apr 30, 5:00 p.m. STAFF COMMENTS A. Southdale Area Transportation Study Working Group Director Houle said he is looking for 2 -3 members.to:help with writing the scope for this study. Member LaForce expressed an inte "rest..Directo'rHoule will send an email invitation as they get closer to the meeting date. B. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Update Director Houle said the east erly.half of thetrail received funding for 2015; they continue to work on funding for the westerly half for.2018. The goal is to get funding for both halves so that they can be constructed at the same time. C. Wooddale AdvisorV'rOike Lane,Update Director Houle said he met with Steve Clark and MNDOT. He said MNDOT is reluctant to make changes because the bike lanes are experimental and they would not be able to evaluate it if changes are made. He said the parking lane is an issue and the suggestion is to install popsicle cones to help with delineation. Member Janovy said she is concerned how people will respond and how the road will look. She said they need to go forward in a way that restores the iconic roadway. She said problems will exist as long as the parking lane is in place. Member lyer asked what happens if the bike lanes were removed and Director Houle said the City would probably lose the grant money. Adding bump -outs were considered but the bid came in at $260,000 said Director Houle. Member Janovy said the City Council wanted a work session and asked if it was scheduled. Director Houle said he was not aware of this. 7 D. Construction Management Plan Update Director Houle said the City Council is holding a work session on Mar 5, 5 p.m. to discuss the Construction Management plan. He said last year there were 100 teardowns. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE - 2013 NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S' -Q/ N D Work Session # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work. Sessions 1 1 / ;:, ., 2 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 50% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 2 100% Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2016 1 1 2 100% er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 1 2 100% Janov , Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 2 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 2 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 2 100% Schwei er, Steven sty dent :' ° 1, 1 /.. 2 100% Sierks, Carolinesfudent 1.; 1 50% Thompson, Michael 2/1/2013 1 1 50% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 , ' ;1, 2 100% To: Mayor and Council otLe IB- Agenda Item #: IV.H. From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works EEO Action Discussion ❑ Date: 3/19/13 Information ❑ Subject: Memorandum Of Understanding To Retain Professional Services With The Joint Waters Commission Action Requested: Approve the Memorandum of.Understanding (MOU) to retain professional services for the Minneapolis Water Rate Review with the Joint Water Commission Information / Background: The City of Edina is a wholesale customer of Minneapolis water and has been for many years. In 2009, the City of Edina approved the attached agreement with the City of Minneapolis that allows Minneapolis to periodically review their rate structure. The City of Minneapolis is currently conducting a Water Rate Review for all wholesale customers including Edina, the Joint Water Commission, Bloomington, and the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC). Each of these entities would like to hire a single professional services Contractor to perform the review of the financial model that is being developed by the City. of Minneapolis so that we can do our due diligence in understanding the differences in the new model. There will be efficiencies created by all of these entities working together. Tasks 1 -3 of the attached proposal from Environmental Financial Group will be split between the four agencies mentioned above but the 4th task, which is to evaluate the model and how it individually affects each agency will be borne by the respective agency. Staff recommends approval of the attached MOU which will simply guarantees that the City of Edina will reimburse the Joint Water Commission for our share of Tasks 1 -3 ($8,225) and all of Task 4 ($8,750). City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) To Retain Professional Services For Minneapolis Water Rate Review Between the Joint Water Commission and the City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis operates a municipal water system known as Minneapolis Water Works (MWW); and WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis has for many years sold water to the Joint Water Commission of Crystal, Golden Valley and New Hope (hereinafter JWC) for distribution; and, WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis has for many years also sold water for distribution to additional suburban municipal customers including, but not limited to Edina and Bloomington as well as the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC); and WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis is proposing changes to the water cost of service methods, rate structures and revenue requirements in an effort to align all of the whole sale water contracts with a uniform cost of services methodology; and WHEREAS, the JWC, Edina, Bloomington and the MAC wish to retain consultant services for the purposes of reviewing the proposed model and methodology, and to provide assistance with contract negotiations; and, NOW THEREFORE, the parties express their mutual understandings and commitments as follows: GAPublic Works - Utilities \Infrastructure Maintenance & Operations \Water System \Minneapolis Water \031913 \JWC Minneapolis COS Review Edina.docx 1. Consultant and Scope of Work Defined The JWC agrees to retain the services of Environmental Financial Group (EFG) and that the JWC will authorize EFG to perform the tasks as set forth in Exhibit A (EFG Proposal dated 7 March 2013). 2. Cost and Payment Referencepetailed Budget of Exhibit A, Tasks 1 -3: The Cost to the City of Edina will be equal to the total of Tasks 1 -3 divided by the number of entities participating in this Memorandum of Understanding. In addition, the City of Edina will pay for Task 4, Customer Specific Analysis and Communications in the amount not to exceed $8,750. The JWC shall invoice the Edina for Tasks 1 -3 upon receipt of the MOU. The JWC will invoice Edina for Task 4 upon completion of the work by EFG. 3. Timeline The participants who are a party to this MOU understand that time is of the essence. In order to comply with the review process set by the MWW, the consultant will begin work beginning the week of March 18, 2013 and will complete Tasks 1 -3 by May 1, 2013. It is anticipated that Task 4 will be completed by June 1, 2013. FOR THE JOINT WATER COMMISSION 1PV Thomas D. Burt, Chair 161,1119: I * 0l 11 V191 AM AN I ► f -1 BY: City Manager GAPublic Works - Utilities \Infrastructure Maintenance & Operations \Water System \Minneapolis Water\031913 \JWC Minneapolis COS Review Edina.docx . ENVIRONMENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1515 N Astor St, Ste 5C Chicago 60610 -5792 USA T +1 312 860 5767 F +1 312 278 0259 7 March 2013 Mr. Tom Burt, Chair Joint Water Commission c/o City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Minneapolis Water Rate Review Dear Mr. Burt: Environmental Financial Group, Inc. ( "EFG ") is pleased to submit to you and the Joint Water Commission ( "JWC ") this letter proposal to conduct a review of proposed City of Minneapolis ( "City") water rates and to participate in related discussions and negotiations. Project Understanding Over the past several weeks, the JWC has been participating in meetings with representatives from the City. These meetings were designed to introduce the JWC and other City wholesale customers to proposed changes in water cost of service methods, rate structures, and revenue requirements. It is apparent that this effort by the City to align all of the wholesale water contracts with a uniform cost of service methodology will involve detailed discussions and amendments to existing contracts. The City has proposed an aggressive schedule to review this proposal, negotiate any necessary contract amendments, and integrate the results into the City's 2014 budget process. The schedule calls for the release of the cost of service computer spreadsheet model on or about April 1, 2013, one -on -one meetings commencing in mid - April, and the conclusion of negotiations on or about May 1, 2013. All of these activities would take place with the model set -up to reflect, audited 2012 financial results. The resulting wholesale rate adjustment factors would then be applied to 2014 budgeted expenses to derive indicated rate increases that would be effective January 1, 2014. Within the next few weeks, City audited financial statements will be available for review. At that time, initial due diligence activities can begin as a lead -up to the April 1 release of the rate model. This review will require a Mr. Tom Burt, Chair Joint Water Commission Minneapolis Water Rate Review concentrated work effort to complete all reviews and analyses prior to anticipated one -on -one customer meetings beginning in mid - April. The JWC and several other wholesale cities have expressed an interest in conducting a detailed review of the rate model, indicated 2012 wholesale rate factors, and financial impacts of proposed changes in the City's cost of service methods. As a result, the JWC has requested that EFG submit a proposal to conduct these services and identify those costs that would be common to all customers and those which would be customer - specific so that the JWC might manage a single consulting contract benefitting multiple customer cities. Goals The goals of this Review are as follows: • Conduct detailed due diligence reviews of the City water rate proposal and cost of service analysis. • Attend one -on -one meetings with the City. • Compare and contrast existing wholesale water purchase agreements with City- proposed revenue requirements, cost of service methods, and other business terms and conditions affecting the cost of City water. • Evaluate the City's inside -city water rate structure and develop benchmark concepts to allow the future indexing of wholesale water rates with City inside -city rates. • Monitor the City's 2014 budget process and assess the financial impacts on the JWC and with other participating city wholesale customers. Scope of Services The following tasks are proposed to reach these goals and objectives. Task 1 I Due Diligence EFG shall conduct a detailed due diligence of the City's water enterprise fund and 2013 Water Rate Study. EFG shall meet with City Water and Finance department staff to collect and discuss financial statements, MERF allocation studies, depreciation and fixed asset schedules, General Fund service cost allocations, capital improvement plans, unaudited management statements, and other information related to the cost of providing water service to the City's wholesale water customers. EFG shall conduct a detailed audit of the City's computer spreadsheet rate model. This audit shall include: precedent and dependent cells, data validity, program logic, error - checking, and other spreadsheet audit functions. EFG shall analyze the cost of service methods employed in the analysis and compare and contrast these with AWWA Manual M1 (which is explicitly referenced in the JWC Water Purchase Agreement.) EFG shall pay particular attention to the use of a "residual cost" approach to determining inside -city revenue requirements. Page 2 Mr. Tom Burt, Chair Joint Water Commission Minneapolis Water Rate Review EFG shall reconstruct 2012 revenue requirements that were used as a target rate year for the 2013 Water Rate Study. This will involve the development of four distinct revenue requirements methods as used by the City and its consultants. Task 2 1 Inside -City Rate Benchmark and 2014 Budget EFG shall analyze the City's "Mayor's Recommended" budget proposal and assess its financial impact on the JWC. EFG shall analyze the City's inside -city water rate structure and assess the ability to use such rates as a benchmark for the future indexing of wholesale rates. EFG shall identify alternatives to the City's proposal to use an average cost per hundred cubic feet as such a benchmark. Task 3 1 Rate Review Report and Documentation EFG shall prepare a detailed letter report documenting the analysis, methods, conclusions and recommendations from Task 1 and 2 activities. EFG shall prepare additional memoranda, talking points, and negotiating notes as necessary. Task 41 Customer Specific Analyses and Communications EFG shall analyze the customer city water purchase and usage records to assess peak -to- average ratios and develop a negotiating strategy for discussions with the City. EFG shall analyze the city's Minneapolis Water Purchase Agreement and compare and contrast the business terms and conditions as against those proposed by the City. EFG shall also estimate the financial impact of the various proposed methods and refinements. EFG shall participate in the following meetings. EFG will produce presentation materials, handouts, as required and requested. 1. Two meetings with customer city representatives. 2. Two one -on -one meetings between customer city and City representatives. Schedule and Budget EFG understands and accepts that the schedule to complete these services will be largely dictated by others. EFG has made this project its first priority. Assuming a April 1, 2013 release of the cost model, Tasks 1 and 2 are proposed to be completed by April 15, 2013, prior to planned one -on -one customer meetings. Page 3 Mr. Tom Burt, Chair Joint Water Commission Minneapolis Water Rate Review Tasks 1 -3 services are proposed to be conducted for a total fee not to exceed $32,900. Per city services (Task 4) are proposed to be conducted for up to $8,750 per city depending on the number of meetings required. Invoices will be submitted monthly and will itemize costs related to each participating customer city. No other EFG personnel will be assigned to this work without prior approval. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to the Department and look forward to your favorable response. Thank you. Very Truly Yours, ENVIRONMENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC )'40 � Scott E. Harder, President and CEO cc: Jeannine Clancy, City of Golden Valley Page 4 Scott Admin TOTALS Harder Asst Hourly Rate $ 175.00 S 45.00 TASK 1- Due Diligence Task 1.1 Data and Document Collection and Review 16 - $ 2,800 Task 1.2 Methodology Analysis. 24 - $ 4,200 Task 1.3 Revenue Requirements Analysis 32 - $ , 5,600 Task 1.4 Rate Model Error Checking 32 - $ 5,600 SUBTOTAL LABOR 104 - $ 18,200 Travel[1] $ 8,750 $ - Printing, courier, communications $ - Subtotal Other Direct Costs $ - SUBTOTAL $18,200 TASK 2 - Inside -City Rate Benchmark and2014 Budget Analysis Task 3.1 Inside -City Rate Benchmark Options Analysis 24 - $ 4,200 Task 3.2 Minneapolis 2014 Budget Review and Rate Impact 24 - $ 4,200 SUBTOTAL LABOR 48 - $ 8,400 Travel[1] $ - Printing, courier, communications $ - Subtotal Other Direct Costs $ - SUBTOTAL $ 8,400 TASK 3 - Rate Review Report and Documentation Task 3.1 Rate Review Letter Report 24 - $ 4,200 Task 3.2 Memoranda, other written communications 12 - $ 2,100 SUBTOTAL LABOR 36 - $ 6,300 Travel[1] $ Printing, courier, communications $ - Subtotal Other Direct Costs $ - SUBTOTAL $ 6,300 DUE DILIGENCE TOTAL $ 32,900 TASK 4 - Customer - Specific Analyses and Communications Task 5.1 Peaking Factor Analysis and Financial Impact 24 - $ 4,200 Task 5.2 Customer city agreement review 8 - $ 1,400 Task 5.3 Minneapolis Customer Meetings and Preparation (2) 12 - $ 2,100 Task 5.4 Client Meetings and Preparation (2) 6 - $ 1,050 SUBTOTALLABOR 50 - $ 8,750 Travel[1] $ - Printing, courier, communications $ - Subtotal Other Direct Costs $ - CUSTOMER CITY TASKTOTAL $ 8,750 (PER CRY) [1] Customary travel expenses are included in hourly rate. Environmental Financial Group Inc. WATER DISTRIBUTION AND USE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 0107 CITY OF EDINA Date: , 2009 City of Minneapolis Contract NO. GPW\WATER DISf &SALE AGREEMENTS\ CITY OF EDINA July 21, 2009 r, -2696 1 RECEItiE AUS °9 2009 CITY OF EDINA PM #09 -12540 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this ! � day of 2009 by and between the CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ('Edina "). WITNESSETH: RECITALS A. The City, through its Department of Public Works, Water Treatment and Distribution Division, operates a municipal water system commonly known as Minneapolis Water Works (MW W). B. The City is authorized to sell and distribute water it produces pursuant' to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 456.29 and 456.37. C. Edina is authorized to purchase and receive water for the operation of its facilities pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 and Section 456.30. D. The City produces water in quantities sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Edina and the City's obligations under this Agreement. E. The City has distributed and sold water to Edina for many years to the mutual benefit of the City and Edina. F. The City and Edina wish to memorialize this demonstrated history of mutual cooperation in the administration of water distribution and use by entering into this Agreement. G. Edina maintains its own water distribution system for the benefit of the residents of the northeast portion of Edina (Morningside). NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by the City and Edina as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.01 Definitions. For the purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings: "Agreement" means this Agreement between the City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina. "AWWA" means the American Water Works Association presently headquartered in Denver, Colorado. "Base — Extra Capacity Method" — see cost of service methodology defined below. GPW \WATER DISUSALE AGREEMENTS\ 1 PM 009 -12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21. 2009 "Billing Period" means the one year period from January 1 through December 31. "Bulk Rate Adjustment Factor" means an adjustment to the Minneapolis Inside City Residential Rate based upon a rate study performed by the City and determined to be equal to sixty -two per cent (62 %) of the Minneapolis Inside City Residential Rate. The Bulk Rate Adjustment Factor is subject to adjustment based upon subsequent rate studies that may be requested by either the City or Edina as provided in Section 5.02 of this Agreement. "Qty" means the City of Minneapolis, a Minnesota municipal corporation and home rule city. "Cost of Service Methodology" means the methodology to be used by the City to determine the cost of providing water to Edina. It refers specifically to the "Base — Extra Capacity Method" of allocating Cost of Service as described in the Ml Manual of Water Supply Practices published by the AWWA. As applied to this Agreement, "Cost of Service Methodology" defines the revenue requirements of the City on a utility basis as set forth in the M1 Manual and will be implemented using the cost of service analysis described in Section 6.02 in determining applicable water rates. The utility basis defines the costs of service as the sum of operations and maintenance costs, an allowance for depreciation and an allowance for return on capital. However, as used herein, the definition of "Cost of Service Methodology" limits the revenue requirements of the City to operations and maintenance costs plus an allowance for depreciation. "Edina" means the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation. "Master Meter" means the meter that is used to invoice Edina for water delivered bey the City. The meter is located at the intersection of South France Avenue and West 40 Street. nneapolis Inside City Residential Rate" means the published price charged by the City to residential customers who live within the city limits expressed in dollars per hundred cubic feet (HCF). The Minneapolis Inside City Rate shall be adjusted during each billing period to reflect any "seasonal rate," "summer surcharge," or "inclining block conservation rate," that may be adopted by the City during the term of this Agreement. Such adjustments shall be determined based on the average monthly Water bill divided by the average monthly Water usage for residential customers located within the city limits or boundary. "User" means other customers, municipalities or joint powers entities that contract with the City for the supply and distribution of Water. "Water" means water at a point of delivery that conforms to the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act as well as all applicable state or other environmental regulations relating to potable Water. GPW\WATER DIST&SALE AGREEMENTS\ 2 PM #09 -12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21, 2009 ARTICLE II DISTRIBUTION AND SALE OF WATER Section 2.01 Distribution and Sale. The City shall sell, fiunish and deliver to Edina from the water works system of the City for the use of Edina and its customers within the limits of the Morningside Area of Edina and to the limited extent hereinafter provided, outside those corpor4te limits, for a period of twenty (20) years in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The City will submit to Edina on a monthly bill for Water used during each Billing Period. Edina will pay the bill within thirty -five (35) days of receipt of the bill. . Section 2.02 Standard of Quality. The City shall provide Water to Edina as meets the definition of Water set forth in Section 1 above. Should the quality of the Water deviate from the standard set forth in the definition of Water in Section 1 above, the City shall promptly inform Edina thereof and address the deviation within a reasonable period of time. Edina may review any Water quality data maintained by the City's Department of Public Works, Water Treatment and Distribution Division, upon one -week prior notice. In the event of operational or W4ter quality problems in the Edina Water system, both parties pledge to work cooperatively to resolve them in a timely manner. Section 2.03 Measurement of Water Supplied. Water delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall be measured by the Master Meters to be furnished and maintained by the City. The Master Meters shall be subject to periodic inspection and testing by Edina and verified by the City according to the AWWA standards for frequency of testing, accuracy and tolerances of such Master Meters. The cost of testing shall be paid by Edina. ARTICLE III OBLIGATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 3.01 Obligations and Warranties of Edina. A. Edina shall construct, own, operate and maintain the water distribution system and storage facilities, downstream of the Master Meters that are necessary to supply Water to all its users. B. Edina shall make investments in, own and maintain and operate all facilities downstream of the Master Meters that are necessary to the metering, transmission, storage and distribution of Water received from the City. C. Edina's governing body has authorized entering into this Agreement. D. Edina will cooperate with the City in any litigation involving the City pursuant to the City being a party to this Agreement where the City and Edina are not adverse parties. GPW \WATER DIST &SALE AGREEMENTS\ 3 PM #09 -12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21, 2009 Section 3.02 Obligations and Warranties of the City. A. The City's Water Treatment and Distribution Facility is operational and has the capacity to supply Water to Edina to satisfy its needs at the MSP during the term of this Agreement. B. The City shall construct, own, operate and maintain water facilities upstream of the Master Meters that are necessary to provide sufficient Water to meet the demand of Edina for the duration of this Agreement. C. The City's governing body has authorized entering into this Agreement. D. The City will cooperate with Edina in any litigation involving Edina pursuant to Edina being a party to this Agreement where Edina and the City are not adverse parties. ARTICLE IV TERM OF AGREEMENT Section 4.01 Duration. Unless terminated earlier as provided in Article VIII of this Agreement, this Agreement shall have an effective date of July 1, 2009, and conclude on June 30, 2028, at 11:59 p.m. ARTICLE V WATER RATES AND SERVICES COSTS Section 5.01 Water Rate. The cost for Water sold by the City to Edina shall be based upon the Bulk Rate Adjustment Factor. The City shall notify Edina before January 1 of each year of any changes to the Minneapolis Inside City Residential Rate and the corresponding Bulk Rate Adjustment Factor. The City will notify Edina before October 1 of each year of the estimated Bulk Rate Adjustment Factor for the following three years. Section 5.02 Changes to the Bulk Rate Adjustment Factor. The City or Edina may at any time, but no more often than bi- annually, request that the rate study performed by the City in February 2009, be updated. The requesting municipality (City or Edina) shall pay for the full cost of the updated rate study and will deliver copies of all the results to the non - requesting municipality. Any suggested changes to the Bulk Rate Adjustment Factor resulting from each rate study shall be incorporated into the Agreement as the new Bulk Rate Adjustment Factor unless both the City and Edina mutually agree to negotiate an amendment to the Agreement based upon the results of said rate study. ARTICLE VI INDEMNIFICATION Section 6.01 Indemnification by Edina. Edina agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all claims or demands for damages arising out of Edina's operations or the actions or neglect of Edina's elected officials, officers, employees or agents, GPW\WATER DIST &SALE AGREEMENTS\ 4 PM #09 -12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21, 2009 relating to this Agreement or relating to the transport, use or disposal of Water supplied pursuant to this Agreement, or from the use, installation, maintenance and repair of Edina's facilities from the points of delivery of Water to Edina as set forth in this Agreement. The City shall give Edina prompt notice of any such action. The foregoing indemnification, and any liability assumed by Edina as a result thereof, shall be subject to the limits of liability and other provisions set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver of defenses or liability limits available to Edina under law. Section 6.02 Indemnification by the City. The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Edina harmless for any and all claims based on the quality of the Water supplied to Edina by the City, which claims arise or may result from the City's operations or the actions or neglect by the City's elected officials, officers, employees or agents pursuant to this Agreement, or from the use, installation, maintenance and repair of the City's facilities inside of the City. Edina shall give City prompt notice of such action. The foregoing indemnification, and any liability assumed by City as a result thereof, shall be subject to the limits of liability and other provisions set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, and subject to the limitations on liability contained in Section 6.03 of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver of defenses or liability limits available to the City under law. Section 6.03 Temporary Suspension of Service by City. Subject to the conditions and limitations set forth herein, when necessary to make repairs to, or changes in, its lines or system, the City may, without incurring any liability therefore, suspend service for such periods as may reasonably be necessary. The City agrees to provide Edina with at least two weeks advance notice of the suspension in service and the repairs and changes to be made, and to cooperate with Edina to adjust the daily delivery schedule in anticipation of the suspension of service. The parties recognize that such temporary service interruptions may involve restrictions that apply to all City customers. In accommodating the needs of Edina during periods when service is suspended, Edina shall receive the same consideration as given to other City customers. The City shall not incur any liability for interruptions in service which result from its failure to supply Water due to the inability to secure processing materials, breakdown or damage to processing, pumping, transmission or distribution facilities, acts of war, sabotage, work stoppage, labor disruptions or conditions or circumstances beyond the authority of the City to control. Section 6.4 Emergency Suspension of Service by City. In the event an emergency occurs which results in the suspension of the delivery of Water by the City to Edina, the City will notify Edina as soon as practical of the nature of the emergency, the City's plan to correct the suspension of Water service . necessitated by the emergency and an expected schedule for repairs and resumption of Water service. ARTICLE VII AMENDMENT OR ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT Section'7.01 Assignment or Transfer of Interest. Edina shall not assign any interest in the Agreement and shall not transfer any interest in the same, either by assignment or novation, without the prior written approval of the City. Edina shall not subcontract any Water services under this Agreement to third parties without prior written approval of the City Department Contract Manager designated herein. GPW\WATER DIST &SALE AGREEMENTS\ 5 PM 1109.12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21, 2009 Section 7.02 No Resale of Water. Edina shall not sell or transfer Water to any User or other entity or individual without the written permission of the City. This prohibition shall not apply to the transfer of Water by Edina to its residents, occupants, and business operators located in the Morningside Area in the ordinary course of business by Edina. Section 7.03 Amendment. Modification or Waiver. No amendment, modification or waiver of any condition, provision or term of this Agreement shall be valid or of any effect unless made in writing, signed by the party or parties to be bound or their duly authorized representative, and specifying with particularity the extent and nature of such amendment, modification or waiver. Any waiver by either party of any breach or default of this Agreement shall not impair or prejudice any right •arising from any other breach or default. Section 7.04 Replaces Previous Agreements. This Agreement supersedes all other Water service agreements, whether written or oral, and any previous understandings between Edina and City. ARTICLE VIII CANCELLATION OR TERMINATION Section 8.01 Cancellation. Either the City or Edina may cancel or terminate this Agreement for any reason without cause upon delivery of written notice to the other party 365 days prior to the date of cancellation or termination. Section 8.02 Termination Upon Default or Breach. Either the City or Edina may terminate this Agreement if either party determines that the other is in default of, or has breached any of the terms of provisions of this Agreement. The nondefaulting party shall have the right to terminate the Agreement upon delivery of written notice to the defaulting party with notice that the event of default shall be cured within forty-five days or such other reasonable time period as the City and Edina may determine. For the purpose of this Agreement, Event of Default shall include, but not be limited to: A. Failure by Edina to remit to the City prompt payment upon receipt of an invoice pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.425. B. Failure by the City to deliver Water to Edina resulting in a breach of public safety, but subject to the limitations provided in Section 6.03 of this Agreement. Section 8.03 Remedies.* If an Event of Default has not been cured within forty -five (45) days or such other reasonable period of time after the written notice as required in Article IX has been delivered, then the City and Edina may proceed as follows: A. For nonpayment by Edina for Water provided and invoiced by the City, the City shall have the right to seek payment by any lawful means and as provided for in this Agreement, at the City's discretion including obtaining and enforcing money judgments and the levying of taxes against Edina for amounts owed and the termination of the delivery of Water service. GPW\WATER DIST &SALE AGREEMENTS\ 6 PM 1709 -12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21. 2009 B. For interruption of Water service that results in a public health or safety crisis, but subject to Section 6.03, Edina may obtain substitute Water service and obtain and enforce a money judgment against the City. C. By either the City or Edina, termination of the Agreement upon delivery of an additional written notice forty -five (45) days prior,to the termination date. No remedies are waived by failure to assert for any previous default. Provided, however, the City and Edina agree that prior to initiation of termination the parties will be required to participate in mediation, in good faith with the goal of resolving whatever conflict or issue that would otherwise give the right to terminate as provided herein. Should the parties agree that mediation has reached an impasse, or if mediation has commenced and six months have passed since its initiation without resolution; then the party seeking to terminate this Agreement may do so upon forty-five (45) days written notice. ARTICLE IX NOTICES Whenever written notice is required under the terms of this Agreement, it shall be sent to the following "Contract Manager ": For the City: Shahin Rezania Director Water Treatment and Distribution Department of Public Works City of Minneapolis 250 South 4t' Street, Room 206 Minneapolis, MN 55415 For Edina: Wayne Houle Director of Engineering and Public Works City of Edina 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 1lotice shall be delivered in person, by courier or by U.S. Postal Service; first class postage. For deliveries by U.S. Postal Service, first class postage, deliveries shall be assumed to have been received three (3) days after deposit in a U.S. mailbox. ARTICLE X CIVIL RIGHTS AND NONDISCRIMINATION Section 10.01 Equal Opportunity Statement. Edina agrees to comply with the provisions of all applicable federal and state statutes and regulations pertaining to civil rights and nondiscrimination including, without limitation, Minnesota Statutes, Section 181.59 and Chapter 363A incorporated herein by reference. GPVAWATER DIST &SALE AGREEMENTS\ 7 PM #09 -12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21, 2009 Section 10.02 Nondiscrimination. Edina will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, sex, national origin, affectional preference, disability, age, marital status or status with regard to public assistance or as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Such prohibition against discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Section 10.03 Disability Compliance Requirements. All parties that enter into contracts with the City are required to abide by the regulations of the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Edina will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of their disability and will take affirmative action to ensure that all employment practices are free from such discrimination. Such employment practices include but are not limited to the following: hiring, promotion, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, discharge, compensation and fringe benefits, classification, referral and training. The ADA also requires parties doing business with the City to provide qualified applicants and employees with disabilities with reasonable accommodation that does not impose undue hardship. Contractors also agree to post in a conspicuous place, accessible to employees and applicants, notices of their policy on nondiscrimination. The above requirements also apply to the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363A. In the event of Edina's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this Agreement, this Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspended, in whole or part, and Edina may be declared ineligible by the Minneapolis City Council from any further participation in City agreements in addition to other remedies as provided by law.' ARTICLE M NUSCELLANEOUS Section 11.01 Data Practices. Edina agrees to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and all other applicable state and federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. Edina must immediately report to the City any requests from third parties for information relating to this Agreement. The City agrees to promptly respond to inquiries from Edina concerning data requests. Edina agrees to hold the City, its officers, and employees harmless from any claims resulting from Edina's unlawful disclosure or use of data protected under state and federal laws. Section 11.02 Retention and Inspection of Records. Edina shall retain all records pertinent to expenditures incurred under this Agreement for a period of the later of six years after the termination date or six years after the resolution of all audit findings. All Edina records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the City or its designees at any time during normal business hours, upon reasonable notice as often as the City deems necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. Section 11.03 Conflict of interest/Code of Ethics. By signing this Agreement, Edina agrees that it will not represent any other party or other client which may create a conflict of GPWIWATER DIST &SALE AGREEMENTS% 8 PM 1109 -12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21, 2609 L, • interest in this Agreement with the City. If Edina is unclear if a conflict of interest exists, Edina will immediately contact the City Department of Public Works Contract Manager and ask for an interpretation. In so far as it relates to its relationship with the City created by this Agreement, Edina agrees to comply with the City's Code of Ethics, City Code of Ordinances, Title 2, Chapter 15. Edina certifies that to the best of its knowledge all City employees and officers participating in this Agreement have also complied with Title 2, Chapter 15 of that Ordinance as it applies to the relationships between the City and Edina created by this Agreement. Compliance with the City's Code of Ethics by Edina will be in its potential role as an "interested person," "lobbyist," and not as a "local official" or "local employee" (except to the extent that an Edina representative or member of its governing body is already a City official or employee). It is agreed by the City and Edina that any violation of the Code of Ethics constitutes grounds for the City to void this Agreement. All questions relative to this section shall be referred to the City and shall be promptly answered. Section 11.04 Intellectual Property and Ownership of Materials. Neither the City nor Edina anticipates any intellectual property will result from the delivery of the services provided for pursuant to this Agreement. However, any finished or unfinished data, studies, surveys, maps, reports or other materials resulting from this Agreement shall become the property of the City upon request by the City. Section 11.05 Applicable Law. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all . interpretations of this Agreement, and the appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation which may arise hereunder will be in those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. (Signature page follows.) GPVAWATER DIST&SALE AGREEMENTS\ 9 PM #09 -12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21, 2009 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. WITNESSETH: CIITY OF MINNEAPOLIS A Municipal Corporation Department Responsible for Administering This Agreement Departure f Public or is epartment Direc or Approved as to Form: _ Assistant City Attorney a Finance Officer/Desi ee 2. <31.0 Date GPWIWATER DIST &SALE AGREEMENTS\ R1 #09.12540 CITY OF EDINA July 21. 2009 49� \lam k o e less AGENDA ITEM V.A. Open To Business Progrm F-] No packet data Oral presentation ❑ Information coming ow e Cofeees To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL. Agenda Item #: VI.A From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Date: March 19, 2013 Information Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3 to PUD, Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat, Lund Food Holdings, 7171 France Avenue, Resolution No. 2013 -31 Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. Information / Background: Lund Food Holdings is proposing to tear down the existing 59,000 Byerly's grocery store, located at 7171 France Avenue and build the following. Phase I ➢ A new 47,000 square foot Byerly's store. ➢ A six/seven -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking. ➢ A six/seven -story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking. Phase 2 ➢ A six -story, 60 -unit apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. In building the first phase, the new Byerly's store would be constructed in the parking lot of the existing store at the northwest corner of the site. The existing store would remain open. When the new store is finished the existing store would be removed, and then the two apartment buildings would be constructed. To accommodate this proposed redevelopment, the following is requested: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; ➢ Preliminary Development Plan; and ➢ Preliminary Plat City of Edina - 4801 W. 501h St. - Edina, MN 55424 v This "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should these "preliminary" requests be approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Development Plan, Final Rezoning and Final Plat review which would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant has developed the proposed plans by attempting to address the issues raised by the Planning Commission and City Council. Some of the most significant changes include: ➢ Bringing the Byerly's store up to France Avenue. ➢ Relocation the loading dock away from the Promenade. ➢ Project embracing the Promenade. ➢ Better pedestrian connections. ➢ Providing sustainable concepts. Planning Commission Recommendation: On March 13, 2013, a Planning Commission motion to approve the requests failed on a vote of 4 -4. (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2013 -31 • Draft minutes from the February 27, 2013, March 13, 2013 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, February 27, 2013 • Revised Plans and Narrative Submitted to the Planning Commission March 13, 2013. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-31 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM PCD -3, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PRELIMINARY PLAT AT 7171 FRANCE FOR LUND FOOD HOLDINGSMOUNT PROPERTIES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Lund Food Holdings is requesting a rezoning from PCD -3 to PUD, Planned Unit Development, a Preliminary Development Plan and a Preliminary Plat, to build a new 47,000 square foot Byerly's store; a six/seven -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a six /seven- story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking; and a six - story, 60 -unit apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Legal Descriptions 1.03 On February 27, 2013, the Planning Commission tabled the request suggesting the applicant consider changes to the proposed plans. 1.04 On March 13, 2013, a Planning Commission motion to approve the requests failed on a vote of 4-4. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center - MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0389 it RESOLUTION NO. 2013-31 Page Two 5. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. 6. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. 7. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. 8. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. *Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. d. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Development Plan, and Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary. Development Plans dated January 28, 2012, the revisions submitted to the Planning A RESOLUTION NO. 2013-31 Page Two Commission March 13, 2013. Final Development plans should include specific locations of trash enclosure areas, number of bike parking spaces provided, and where loading/ deliveries are made to the retail space and apartments. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. 5. Architectural features or articulation must be added to the north elevation of the new Byerly's building. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated February 22, 2013. 7. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 8. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 9. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 10.. The Park Dedication fee of $1,230,00 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on March 19, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-31 Page Two CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 19, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk A Exhibit A EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Asper Schedule 'A' from Commitment to Title from First American Title Title Insurance Company, File No. NCS -495475 -MPLS, dated June 29, 2011.) The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin. State of Minnesota, and is described as follows: Parcel 1: Lot 2, Block 7, Yorktown, Hennepin County Minnesota. Parcel 2: (Proposed) Non - exclusive Cross Parking and Driveway Easement Agreement over a portion of Lot 3, Block 7, Yorktown, Hennepin County, Minnesota recorded as Document No. In the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION.`: `:'"':;:;: Lot 1, Block 1, Byerly's Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 2, Block 1, Byedy's Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 3, Block 1, Byedy's Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 4, Block 1, Byedy's Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Planning Commission March 13, 2013 A. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Preliminary Development Plan, and Preliminary Plat. Anderson -KM Builders, 7171 France Avenue South, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission they continued this item at their last meeting. Teague reported that he and Chair Staunton met to clarify for the applicant the major concerns expressed by the Commission at that meeting. Those concerns were shared with both the applicant and Commissioners via e-mail. Suggestions from the Commission were to widen and expand the connections to the promenade, enhance the pedestrian crossings within the,site, add windows to west and north elevation, address better screening for the loading dock and work on enhancing the water feature. Sustainability was also an issue with the Commission expressing that they were looking for ways to ensure that sustainable standards implemented are measureable. Appearing for the Applicant: Jim Vos, Cresa, Greg Anderson, Anderson Builders, Maureen Michaliski, Schaefer Richardson Applicant Presentations Mr. Vos addressed the Commission and reported that sustainable standards would be measurable. Vos said Lund Holdings is committed to construct buildings that use materials that reduce energy consumption. These include low flow toilets, lighting, mechanicals, motion sensors and other measures. Vos said their goal is to achieve a measurable standard 5% better than the existing energy codes. With graphics Vos pointed I out the changes to the pedestrian flow to and from the promenade and internally (covered walkways, heated sidewalks). Vos noted the connection to the promenade has been widened and ties in directly to the Byerly's store. The internal crossings are stamped concrete clearly defining the crossings. Vos further added the water feature has been enhanced and it includes an area for seating. Continuing, Vos said they also envision creating a "meeting area" with an art element. This area would be used by the apartment residents, Byerly's patrons and those walking along the promenade. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel noted the mention of LEED standards in the buildings; and questioned who actually signs off on this. Grabiel says he understands their intent to follow LEED standards; however, someone must review their measures and sign off on them. Vos responded that there is a judiciary body the reviews the standards. 1 /A • Commissioner Potts acknowledged sustainability can be challenging to address. He said he wants to how much "better the buildings will be" than just meeting the standard building code. Potts noted the applicant indicated their goal is to be 5 percent better than state code; adding that's a start, but more could be accomplished. Continuing, Potts asked if both the retail.and housing is working with EDA. Vos responded in the affirmative. With regard to storm water Potts questioned if the applicant heard anything from the Watershed District. Vos responded they are working with the District; however, the details haven't been hammered out. Vos said there is the assumption that water runoff would be handled through underground storage, adding water quality should rise. A discussion ensued on parking acknowledging some Commissioners felt that parking could be reduced allowing for more green space. Mr. Vos said it was very important that the store provides adequate parking. Vos said measures could be implemented internally such as adding more cashiers, carry-outs that would move patrons through the store more efficiently. This would also free up parking at a faster rate of turnover. Vos concluded that it has been difficult addressing sustainability without formal criteria from the City. Chair Staunton acknowledged the lack of City standards on sustainability and pointed out one of the obstacles the City faces is the building code. All building code standards must be met. Staunton said the Commission felt that adopting the PUD ordinance would be a way for the City to negotiate above those standards. Commissioner Grabiel stated one issue of concern raised at the last meeting was the driveway encroachments between the Byerly's site and the Wolfson site to the east at 3655 Hazelton Road. Grabiel asked if that issue was resolved. Vos responded in the affirmative. The Byerly's driveway no longer encroaches. Chair Grabiel commented that at the last meeting the applicant indicated the difficulty in redeveloping the site while the present store was open. Grabiel asked if that's still the case. Vos responded in the affirmative. He stated that was mandated from the start. Commissioner Forrest said.in reviewing the site plan that she believes bike racks should be located closer to the patio area. Vos agreed adding that can be reviewed. Forrest also encouraged more landscaping especially along the east, adding that wall still appears a bit tall and blank. Chair Staunton said he was curious if the applicant views the PUD process as a benefit to them. Vos responded that the PUD process is a benefit and provides the development team with the chance to do something different from what could be done through straight rezoning. Mr. Vos said the added density and setback variances allow this area to be created as part of the community at large. It can address the promenade and invite "people in" and become a destination. Commissioner Schroeder said he appreciates the sustainability goal of 5% above code; however, he believes that doesn't go very far. Continuing, Schroeder.said he also appreciates the statement that water would be handled through underground storage systems; however, storing the water that way probably is the result of the site itself. Concluding, Schroeder said he doesn't see any extra effort made to go above and beyond what would normally be done. 2 w Commissioner Carr stated that overall she believes the project was very well done, adding she has a few questions. One is the seating capacity of the patio areas. Mr. Vos responded that the at grade patio would seat between 20 & 30 visitors and the mezzanine level roughly 15. Carr asked if trees are proposed for the parking lot, adding she thinks that's a nice touch. Vos responded that can be looked at that again, however, if we add trees islands need to be added and islands can create difficulty with maintenance (plowing, etc.). Carr also asked Vos to explain the building materials and their compatibility (Byerly's and residential component). Voss indicated the materials that would be used concluding their intent was to coordinate the finishes'and color type, adding the Byerly's and the residential component won't match, however would be completely compatible. Commissioner Carr concluded that she does have a concern with the north elevation of the building, adding she would like to see windows. placed along that building wall. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. The following gave their testimony: Robert Rofidal, 7125 Briston Boulevard, Edina, MN R. Wolfson, 3655 Hazelton Road, Edina, MN Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none; Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Mr. Houle to speak to traffic. Mr. Houle gave a brief report on the traffic analysis. Chair Staunton noted that the traffic measures referred to; signalization or roundabout, and asked Mr. Houle his preference. Houle responded because of the disruption to the site and streets it takes to add a traffic signal that he believes a roundabout is the way to go. Houle reported that they have a roundabout design that can accommodate semi delivery trucks. Houle also noted that signalization at this point doesn't meet the State and County requirements, adding it is possible those requirements will be met sometime in the future, but now the State and County won't sign off on a signalization at this location. Houle pointed out this situation isn't too much different from the Westin and.Target issue; adding a roundabout was placed in that area over signalization. Commissioner Carpenter said he continues to have problems with this project and would vote against it, adding in his opinion it's an uninspired development and the lack of pedestrian integration between the promenade, residential element of the site the retail component is troubling. With regard to parking Carpenter said he would rather see more parking than less, adding he doesn't want to see cars waiting for parking spaces concluding he would rather error on the side of sufficient parking. 3 Commissioner Forrest stressed that at final she would like to see the materials board, adding she wants assurance that the materials used are compatible. Commissioner Grabiel commented that he believes the City over parks, adding this is just his opinion. Grabiel said what he is having difficulty with this evening is "negotiating" with the applicant over specific issues. Grabiel said he doesn't feel the City has a good enough tool to negotiate during the PUD process. He pointed out according to State Statute the City needs to act on a submittal within a specific timeframe, reiterating in his opinion it's difficult to negotiate at a public forum. He pointed out the last time the Commission met specific items were listed; the applicant came back with some of.those issues addressed ; and if the Commission continues to have further issues this could go on and on. Grabiel acknowledged the mention of forming a subcommittee that would negotiate with the developer during the PUD process, which could work; however, again the City has time limit. Commissioner Scherer states she is likely to vote in favor of this project. She said she continues to have issues; especially the long north facing brick wall, adding to her it looks like a prison with two guard towers at the end. She said she was also concerned with the height of the retaining wall for the community element, adding she would like it softened because she doesn't want the appearance of a tunnel from the promenade. Scherer stated she understands this is a balancing act, adding she will be very interesting in viewing the covered walkway because to her it could look cheesy. Concluding, Scherer said this has been a strange process and she appreciates everyone's input. Commissioner Potts stated that this request is asking for a significant increase in density, adding he was expecting more coming out of the gates. Concluding, Potts said he doesn't see a community benefit to grant the PUD. Commissioner Forrest stated she agrees with Commissioner Scherer's and Carr's comments on the north building wall. With regard to the PUD process Forrest acknowledged it's a balancing act that may need to be revisited further down the line. Further discussion continued on the PUD process itself and the project's pluses and minuses. Chair Staunton asked for motion. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend preliminary rezone to PUD and preliminary development plan based on staff findings found on pages 14 & 15 of the staff report and subject to staff conditions found on pages 15 & 16 of the staff report. Preliminary plat approval is also recommended based on staff conditions on page 16 of the staff report; noting the payment of a Parkland Dedication fee of $1,230,000 to be paid prior to release of the final plat. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. Commissioner Carr asked to amend the motion to include the addition of architectural features along the north building wall. Commissioners Grabiel and Forrest accepted that amendment. Ayes; Scherer, Carr, Forrest, Grabiel. Nays; Schroeder, Potts, Carpenter and Staunton. Motion failed. 4 E. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Preliminary Redevelopment Plan, and Preliminary Plat. Anderson -KM Builders. 7171 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Lund Food Holdings is proposing to tear down the existing 59,000 Byerly's grocery store, located at 7171 France Avenue and build a two phase project. Phase 1 would include a new 47,000 square foot Byerly's store, a six /seven story 109 - unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking and a six /seven story, 77- unit apartment building with a first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking. Phase 2 would consist of a six -story 60 -unit apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. Teague reported In building the first phase, the new Byerly's store would be constructed in the parking lot of the existing store at the northwest corner of the site. The existing store would remain open. When the new store is finished the existing store would be removed, and then the two apartment buildings would be constructed. Concluding, Teague explained to accommodate the proposed redevelopment the following is requested; Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; Preliminary Development Plan; and Preliminary Plat. Teague noted if "preliminary" requests are approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Development Plan, Final Rezoning and. Final Plat review which would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Continuing with his presentation Teague reminded the Commission that the applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council and from those meetings developed the proposed plans by attempting to address the issues raised by the Planning Commission and City Council. Those revisions include bringing the Byerly's store up to France Avenue, relocated the loading dock away from the Promenade, have the project embrace the Promenade, better pedestrian connections and providing some sustainable concepts. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to build a new 47,000 square foot Byerly's store; a six -story 106 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a six - story, 77 -unit apartment building with first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking; and a six - story, 60 -unit apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on Page 9 of 18 the first level and two levels of underground parking. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. 5. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. 6. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. 7. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. 8. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. . A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. *Parking ratios Page 10 of 18 for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. d. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated January 28, 2012, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. Final Development plans should include specific locations of trash enclosure areas, number of bike parking spaces provided, and where loading /deliveries are made to the retail space and apartments. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated February 22, 2013. 6. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. Planner Teague further recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat to create a new four lot subdivision at 7171 France for the proposed project based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 3. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 4. The Park Dedication fee of $1,230,00 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Appearing for the Applicant Jim Vos, Cresa, Greg Anderson, Anderson Builders, Paul Holmes, Pope Architects, Maureen Page 11 of 18 Michaliski, Schaefer Richardson Questions /Discussion Commissioner Grabiel noted that presently there is a grade change from France Avenue onto the site and asked Planner Teague if the site would continue to be elevated from France. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest commented that she understands housing is a permitted Conditional Use in the PCD -3 zoning district and asked Planner Teague if the Commission could limit the type of retail "use" in the residential component of the project. Continuing, Forrest said if limiting uses are allowed how would the Commission do it - would it be per parcel. Planner Teague responded that presently all uses allowed in the PCD -3 zoning district are permitted; however, the Commission can limit those uses per site. Continuing, Teague noted that any "use" not "called out" in the ordinance is prohibited. Commissioner Forrest questioned if the developer could choose to develop this area through the PCD -3 zoning process and not through PUD. Teague responded that could occur; however, rezoning the site to PUD solidifies a "what is approved is what you get" development. A straight PCD -3 rezoning allows all uses permitted in that zoning district to be "used ". Applicant Presentation Jim Vos, Cresa, representing Lund Food Holdings, said they are happy to be back with a redevelopment proposal developed from the feedback they received from the Commission and Council at Sketch Plan Review. Vos introduced the development team. Paul Holmes addressed the Commission and explained the proposed redevelopment plan will be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 includes a replacement for the Byerly's store of 47,000 square feet, and two market -rate rental apartment buildings Building A is a 6- story, 124,250 square foot, 106 unit building, with two levels of underground parking. Building B consists of a 6- story, 81,375- square foot, 77 -unit building with 10.450 square feet of retail space on the west of the ground level, and two levels of underground parking. Phase 2 consists of a 50,400 square foot, 48 -unit apartment building, and 10,500 square feet of retail area on the west side of the ground level and two levels of underground parking. Concluding his presentation Holmes said RLK completed a traffic study, adding that the housing element would be managed by Steven Scott. Steven Manhart, RLK reported on the findings in the traffic analysis that indicated that this redevelopment would result in acceptable levels of service for traffic using existing roadways. Mr. Manhart said in particular it was found that the additional access points to and from the Byerly's redevelopment site greatly benefit the traffic operations despite there being more trips generated than in the current situation. Page 12 of 18 Chair Staunton asked City Engineer Houle to present his findings on the France Avenue TE, specifically because it relates so closely with what's occurring in the area as far as redevelopment goes. Houle delivered a power point presentation highlighting the following design elements: • Consider narrowing lanes • Widen and landscape medians • Enhance pedestrian crosswalks • Enhanced intersection corner treatments (suggested Biscuit Planters) • Traffic signal improvements • Pedestrian /bike phasing and detection • Accessible pedestrian signals (APS) countdown timers, etc. With graphics Houle illustrated traffic and pedestrian movements. Houle reported the schedule that would be followed. 1) Plans to Hennepin County /Federal Aid (2/4/2013); Plan approved for Letting (March 31, 2013), Construction June, 2013 — September 2013. Houle also reported a volunteer is needed at the Planning Commission level for Urban Design review. Houle stated this working group would focus on urban design for the corridor. Houle said he believes the working group would meet for roughly three months. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel asked if the proposed residential units are rental. Mr. Voss responded in the affirmative. Grabiel questioned their intent to replat — who would own the apartment buildings and could they be sold to another party. Vos responded the intent is a long term partnership with Schaefer Richardson, adding the parcels are being split to accommodate financial requirements for construction. Commissioner Forrest asked for clarification on the elevation of the residential community area, adding to her it appears above grade. Mr. Vos responded that area is above grade by roughly 7 -feet at its highest point. Chair Staunton asked if more units had been added since Sketch Plan Review. Mr. Vos responded in the affirmative. Mr. Holmes interjected and explained the siting of the buildings guided unit quantity, adding he believes there is an increase of 40- units. Staunton questioned if any consideration was given to pulling Building B closer to France Avenue. Mr. Holmes said their goal with the residential element of the project was to have the housing address the promenade as suggested by the Commission and Council. Continuing, Holmes said that their intent was also to separate the commercial from residential and to have the parking for the store be in front. Commissioner Scherer questioned if unit size was determined. Ms. Michalski informed the Commission there is a wide range of unit size. Studio apartments begin at around 590 - square Page 13 of 18 feet, 1- bedrooms between 620 -830, and the range goes up from there with some loft units in excess of 1,500 square feet. Ms. Michalski gave a brief presentation of the housing units adding the design team went with a more classic look and feel to the residential building component of the project. Commissioner Scherer referred to a letter received from the property owner at 3655 Hazelton Road and asked if the lot line issue was clarified. Mr. Vos said they are working with that owner and are trying to strike a balance. Commissioner Potts said he is'having a difficult time appreciating the pedestrian connection from the promenade. Potts added he imagined a more "formal" pathway from the promenade into the site and to the new store. Mr. Vos said options are still open, and pointed out the plans indicate a pedestrian grid throughout the site. Potts suggested they "take this to the next level" by emphasizing the paths and reduce parking spaces. Concluding Potts said there are some great features in this project; however, more needs to be done. Mr. Holmes responded that at this time the plans are in the preliminary stages. Commissioner Schroeder commented on sustainability referenced in the submitted materials and asked the development team if they have a target or set of goals they want to achieve. Mr. Vos responded that the proposed new store would be smaller, which reduces energy and other measures such as mechanical design and lighting etc. would also be implemented. Ms. Michalski told the Commission the development team is also working with Excel, White Group on energy design. Mr. Vos reiterated with the use of better mechanical systems, lighting and the shrinking of the foot print there would be measurable energy savings. Commissioner Schroeder stated that may be true; however, he would like to see the applicant formulate an outline and frame a target that illustrates the energy efficiency measures that will be implemented for this project. Schroeder said he there are ways to document differences in energy consumption from a building constructed in 2013 to one that was constructed in the 1970's or 80's. Ms. Michalski said working with the White Group should help the process. Commissioner Forrest asked in reference to Engineer Houle's presentation if Metro Transit is part of the discussion. Houle responded in the affirmative. Public Testimony The following spoke to the project: John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place Janet Bohan, 800 Coventry Place Bill Wolfson, 3655 Hazelton Road Resident of 7220 York Avenue Resident 7220 York Avenue Page 14 of 18 Motion Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to this project; being none; Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Chair Staunton asked if the store would have carry outs or would it be parcel pick up. Mr. Holmes responded parcel pick up is proposed for the store. Staunton further questioned if the type of retails uses have been determined. Mr. Holmes responded that he envisions a mobile phone store, a Noodles or Punch restaurant, adding the retail, tenant mix is still being worked out. Commissioner Schroeder referred to the traffic figures and questioned if Byerly's was expecting to lose customers. He pointed out the traffic analysis standard considers building size; however, in this instance Schroeder said he doesn't believe the smaller Byerly's building makes any difference with regard to traffic to and from the store. A discussion ensued on traffic calculations, pedestrian access and site circulation. Chair Staunton noted that this is a two -step process; however it is very important the Commission gets preliminary right. Continuing, Staunton said from the discussion so far there appears to be building site issues on the east side, lack of sustainability measures and limited future build out analysis. Commissioner Kilberg said he would like to add a youth view to the discussion. Kilberg said he enjoys walking the Centennial Lakes pathways, adding that the access to the promenade is a huge plus for this redevelopment proposal. Kilberg said in his opinion, this proposal should be developed as a destination; especially the Byerly's store and the small retail spaces. Kilberg also added the proposal is good for the community and achieving easy access for vehicles and pedestrians is beneficial for all. Concluding, Kilberg said he views this redevelopment as a continuation of Centennial Lakes park and promenade walking path. The walkability is very good and will flow as one large circle. Kilberg said he also envisions opportunity on the site to develop a "square" or meeting area, adding the current plan doesn't seem to achieve that level of pedestrian interaction. Commissioner Platteter stated he has continues to have concerns with the project and in general has trouble envisioning this parcel as pedestrian friendly; especially its relationship to the promenade. Platteter also noted that the interior pedestrian flow needs clarity - how will the pedestrian navigate between landscape islands and the retail components. Concluding Platteter stressed the importance of walkability. He said to achieve walkability the residential components may need to be pulled back from the promenade. With regard to sustainability and working with the White Group a certain percentage of measurability needs to be documented. He also said he was a bit uncomfortable with the water feature. Page 15 of 18 Commissioner Scherer also noted positive features of the plan; however expressed the following concerns: better refine connectivity, reconsider the variance from the promenade, will these apartment buildings be "light stealers" from the properties to the east; adding she is also uncomfortable with the loading dock. Commissioner Potts suggested that the applicant return to the Commission with a revised plan to include more information on sustainability, energy design and further explain the joint program with Excel. Commissioner Forrest said that the Commission and development team should work together in developing this site as a PUD. Forrest stated she was a little disappointed with the PUD process, noting, what's occurring isn't much different from a straight PCD -3 rezoning. Forrest reiterated she thought that through the PUD process the Commission and applicant would work together and come up with ideas that fine tune the project. Forrest pointed out this is the first time the Commission has viewed this proposal; it's an important proposal and in her opinion it requires more thought. Chair Staunton commented that instead of a continuance the Commission "could" grant preliminary rezoning approval and list the categories Commissioners feel need more work. Staunton relayed what he heard so far is: • Provide more clarity on pedestrian circulation within the site and how the pedestrian addresses the site from the promenade and vice versa. • Consider reconfiguring the apartment building layout; possible look at reducing the variance. • Hammer down the water feature on the site. • Some Commissioners expressed displeasure_ with the loading dock scenario; location and screening. Can this be reconfigured? • How does the pedestrian element tie in with the retail components of the apartment buildings? • Create a better blend or "tie in" between the residential component of the site and the promenade and the Byerly's store itself. • Consider "use" restrictions. • Develop sustainability measures. Mr. Vos questioned if the Commission was at least supportive of the site plan (building arrangements). Commissioners commented that they have little opposition to the west side of the site; however the east side of the site needs work. Mr. Vos asked if that could mean relocating or moving the buildings. Commissioners said that was a possibility. Chair Staunton commented that in all fairness this has been a long meeting, agreeing that it may be best to continue the hearing to the next meeting of the Planning Commission on March Page 16 of 18 13th. This would allow the Commission more time to revisit the plans and also to allow more time for the applicant to possibly re -tool the project. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to continue the request for preliminary rezoning, preliminary plat, and preliminary development for Lund Holdings until the next meeting of the Planning Commission on March 13, 2013. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion to continue the meeting to March 13, 2013 approved. The applicants stressed how difficult it is to modify a site plan when certain factors can't be changed; one being the existing store must remain open during the construction of the new store and in terms of a loading dock; this is a grocery store, a loading dock is needed, and the Commission and Council have both indicated their desire to have the store relocated as close to France Avenue as possible. Mr. Holmes asked if the Commission had any suggestions on where the loading dock should be located; adding, there aren't many options. Concluding, the applicants asked for clarification and direction with the density and the orientation of the residential components of the project. Chair Staunton asked Commissioners to clarify if they "were OK" with the layout of the store and residential buildings. A number of Commissioners reiterated they were OK with the siting of the building on the west side (Byerly's store); however, were uncomfortable with the residential element on the east side. A number of Commissioners indicated they can't rule out the possibility of rearranging the buildings in the residential component. Commissioner Grabiel questioned what would happen if the applicant comes back and informs the Commission they can't change certain aspects of the project. It was noted if that were to occur the Commission would have to vote the project either up or down. Chair Staunton thanked everyone for their participation adding the request has been tabled to the next meeting of the Planning Commission on March 13, 2013. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of'packet materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Staunton thanked everyone for attending the ULI Workshop held at the Senior Center last week. Staunton also noted that in speaking with Planner Teague they felt it may be time to have a Planning "refresher" course with the City Attorney, Roger Knutson. Staunton said he and Teague would work on finding the right date for that event. Continuing, Staunton said it may be time to revisit the "Work Plan ", adding he would speak with Teague to set a date to add it to the agenda. Concluding, Staunton introduced new Page 17 of 18 w D z W Q W U z LLa LL HAZED =0A I P.��rlelal _�z I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I l l l l l l t \NjI1'� Schafer Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS Comprehensive Building S Development Services REVISED SITE PLAN WAEnrunwe/ BY OTHe11$ i/ Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue Re- Development EDINA, MN 3 -7 -2013 1 15226 -11051 VIEW OF CORNER FROM FRANCE AVENUE Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue ■■ Schafer ANDERSON Re- De�Nelopment - - ■ ■Richardson ■ KM BUILDERS 3 -11 -2013 1 15226 -11051 Compronen -e 6udnmq L Development Services PROMENADE AT SCULPTURE Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue V�ir Schafer ANDERSON Re- Development Richardson ■ KM BUILDERS EDINA MN 3- 11.2013 115226-11051 S011 Comprehensive Building 6 Development Services PROMENADE AT SIGN LOOKING NORTHWEST Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue Re- Development EDINA, MN 3 -11 -20131 15226 -11051 ■ ■ Schafer 0 0 Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS C..p,.h js BuilOmq L Development S. vl 1 PROMENADE LOOKING NORTH Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue v ■ ■Schafer ANDERSON Re- Development � KM BUILDERS EDINA MN Richardson �om „ehe�„ ea , P 3- 11-2013 1 15226.11051 q 6 oeveio ment Services ■1 3 PROMENADE LOOKING NORTH Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue ■■ Schafer ANDERSON Re- Development -, F ■ KM BUILDERS ED D INA, MN Richardson 3.11 -2013 1 15226 -11051 7mn.enensme e,me,np � 0- 1.pment 5e—ces Cary Teague om: Greg Anderson <ganderson @anderson - km.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:02 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: FW: Byerly's Edina - Sustainability Importance: High We received approval from Lunds during our project progress meeting today to send this email on to you regarding Lund's operational, sustainability attributes. Sorry for the late transfer of this information, but wanted you to have it in order to send it on to the planning commission members if possible. Thanks Cary, Greg Anderson I Chief Construction Officer 1 D: 952 - 746 -1465 1 C: 952 - 292 -1100 ganderson(cDanderson- km.com 1 4220 Park Glen Road I St. Louis Park, MN 55416 ANDERSON KM BUILDERS ' 7irtk green L�efore, printing this email. Comprehensive Building & Development Services From: Edgett, Mike fmailto: Mike. Edgett(ablfhi.coml Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 9:47 AM To: 'Jim Vos'; Greg Anderson Cc: 'Matt Masica'; Wirtanen, Kris; Kent, Jenifer; Lindeman, Wally Subject: Byerly's Edina - Sustainability Hello Jim and Greg, I understand we took too long to add any information to Matt's sustainability letter to Cary Teague on our Byerly's Edina project. I still think there could be some merit to having this information available for the upcoming meetings with the Planning Commission and /or the City Council. You are welcome to utilize any of this if your see fit to do so. Refrigeration System a. Hybrid condensers save energy and lower the total refrigerant charge by utilizing micro channel heat exchangers and E.C. motors. b. Individual case controllers further lower the refrigerant charge and energy usage by utilizing a loop piping strategy. c. The refrigeration rack system will incorporate variable capacity compressors which also lowers energy usage. d. We will utilize reclaimed heat from the refrigeration system to pre -heat water before it goes to the gas fired water heaters. e. Refrigerated cases will be of efficient design incorporating E.C. motors and efficient coil design. f. The above listed items will allow the total refrigerant charge will be 30% less than a standard system. g. Energy usage will be 25% to 40% more efficient than the standard systems. h. Night shades on all open style cases provides 50% more efficiency while the store is closed 2. Energy Management System a. Our system design monitors all components and interacts with the HVAC, refrigeration system and cases, and the overall store lighting to provide 10% less energy usage. 3. Lighting Systems a. Both interior and exterior lighting will be 20% more efficient than standard. b. Day lighting and automatically dimmable fixtures will be utilized to save energy. c. Motion activated lighting systems will be utilized in all office spaces, meeting rooms, walkin coolers and freezers d. Energy management system automatically adjusts lighting back during closed hours. 4. General Equipment a. Auger style cardboard compactor allows for 3 times the capacity within the haul away container saving on trips to the recycle center. This list captures the main contributors to sustainability components within the store. There are many more store operations driven policies and procedures that add to the performance standards for this new Byerly's store. We offer these as a means to quantify and measure the store's success. Thank you, Mike Edgett Senior Project Manager Lund Food Holdings, Inc. 952 - 915 -2680 March 6, 2013 Mr. Cary Teague Director of Community Development City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: 7171 France Avenue Redevelopment PAI Project No.15226.11051 Dear Cary: ji&liia In our original Preliminary Development Application submittal, our project narrative outlined several sustainable concepts that the project team is very excited about. During the February 271h Planning Commission meeting, we heard the comment that our sustainable goals for the project should provide a way to measure these goals. The current design of the site and buildings bring a high degree of sustainable attributes when measured by industry standard third party sustainable rating systems. The housing portion of the site in particular will be going through one such industry standard program, the Energy Design Assistance program facilitated by Xcel Energy. This program uses the same energy modeling standard as the USGBCs LEED program; ASHRAE 90.1 2007. Both LEED and EDA's programs benchmark the building's overall energy performance taking into account the building envelope and the mechanical and electrical systems that are provided within them. While this process will take considerable design development to get to the point of having measurable results to share, the housing team is committed to the EDA process. It is our opinion that the EDA process would provide a measurable third party standard in which the project can be benchmarked in comparison to other projects. Beyond that, we want to emphasize the project's sustainability goals in addition to the EDA process. Sustainable site items include: • Added density. The site will help curtail urban sprawl and be well connected to the surrounding community therefore reducing the number of automobile trips and making use of a previously developed site and infrastructure. • The site has been designed to accommodate different modes of transportation and features strong pedestrian connections, areas for bicycle storage, connection to mass transit, and accommodations for automobiles while reducing the amount of surface parking and accommodating electric vehicles by means of charging stations at the housing and grocery locations. • Our current storm water management design calls for water to be retained on site via at -grade infiltration and underground storage which will help both the rate and quality of the wateir,as it eventually leaves the site. We also continue to have discussions with the city about-tile potent! collecting rainwater from rooftops to be routed into the proposed city water feature near the promenade as well as other storm water strategies to exceed watershed requirement�'� POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 1295 BANDANA BOULEVARD N, SUITE 200 www.popearch.com ST. PAUL, MN 55108 -2735 (6511642-9200 1 FAX (6511642-1101 7171 France Ave. Redevelopment March 6, 2013 Water efficiency items include: The selection of low flow plumbing fixtures. Drought tolerant landscaping on the site and sprinklers utilizing moisture sensors to avoid unnecessary operation. Energy consumption and its effect on the atmosphere: • We would point to the previously mentioned EDA process through Xcel Energy as an effective and measurable third party process that the housing portion of the site will undergo. • When looking at materials and resources for the projects many of the materials will come from a 500 mile radius of the site; reducing the negative impact of the transportation of the building materials to the site as well as aiding local economies. • A high recycled content for building materials selected for the project including the re -use of parts of the existing building and parking lot as base and aggregate for the new parking lots. • An increased percentage of recycled material when waste is removed from site during construction thus reducing the impact on landfills. • At the grocery store we will be using high efficiency refrigeration systems and incorporating an energy management system which controls HVAC, lighting, and optimizes operating efficiencies. Improved indoor environmental quality: • Use of low VOC adhesives, sealants, paints, and flooring. • A mix of LED and fluorescent lighting, many of which will be tied to occupancy sensors throughout the project to reduce the overall energy demand for the project. • Day - lighting strategies and consideration of views for the occupants by window placement and building orientation. In conclusion, we are very excited about the sustainable ideals that are integrated into the design of the project. We want to emphasize that there will be measurable results specifically from the Energy Design Assistance program through Xcel Energy and on top of that there will be a wide array of sustainable features that will be seen, felt, and experienced on site from the charging stations in the parking areas to the day - lighting strategies for the grocery store. We feel that this project will be a tremendous asset to the City and look forward to working together with the City on a great project and amenity to the community at large. Sincerely, POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 0)4C14=k00.' I Matt Masica Senior Project Architect �P� March 6, 2013 Mr. Cary Teague Director of Community Development City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: 7171 France Avenue Redevelopment PAI Project No. 15226.11051 Dear Cary: POPE A R C H I T E C T S A family vacation will keep me from attending the Planning Commission meeting on the 13th'. So, in advance of that session, I want to provide some additional input regarding the project, and the revisions that are being made in response to the meeting of the 27th We will also be submitting additional drawings and renderings, and hopefully this narrative and those exhibits will convey our approach clearly. Jim Vos of Cresa Partners, and others on the team, will be present on the evening of the 13th to present the changes in person, and to answer questions. Reflecting on the meeting of the 27th, and reviewing the video archive (yes, all of it!), it was clear that there is a central disagreement about the organizational forces that should inform the site plan. One idea is that the design team should "grab the Promenade and pull it on to and through the site ", creating a new pedestrian armature around which buildings, roadways and parking are organized. The other view (ours) is that the Promenade itself is a strong pedestrian armature that informs the organization of sites adjacent to it, but, that to extend a pathway of that sort through our site, and to make it the primary organizing principle, would be to skew the true planning priorities. The goals of this project are, very simply, to sell groceries and rent apartments, and to develop the site in a way that best supports those endeavors, within the context of the comp plan, zoning regulations and the PUD process. Significant factors that shape the site plan include: • Keeping Byerly's in business during construction of a replacement store • Providing safe and convenient access for people in cars. This is the primary way that retail customers and residents will travel to and from the site on any day, and throughout the year. • Providing adequate visibility for retail • Providing the quantity of rental housing units needed to support the investment structure • Keeping building height at no more than six stories to control construction cost • Maintaining appropriate separation of retail and housing • Making roadway connections at mandated access points on Hazelton and France • Making best use of proximity to the Promenade Pedestrian connection to the Promenade is important and desirable, and the Promenade is an amenity-that has informed the location of the housing. But it is not, and should not be the primary organizingfdree Our site is adjacent to the Promenade, but it is not the Promenade. �3 POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 1295 BANDANA BOULEVARD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735 (651) 642 -9200 1 FAX(651)642 -1101 +N W"Apopearch.com 7171 France Ave. Redevelopment March 6, 2013 There is another force shaping the site plan, and that is the input provided to us by Planning Commission and City Council during the Sketch Plan Review process in the spring of 2012. During that process, we clearly heard the following priorities voiced: • That the Byerly's store and the housing were too close together, and that retail activities would compromise the quality of the residential neighborhood next to the Promenade • That the Byerly's store should be pulled up to France Avenue, away from the Promenade • That a stronger pedestrian connection should be created with the Promenade and that a public outdoor gathering place should be established on our site • That in order to achieve the above, building height and parking count were malleable • That (subsequent to the sketch plan process) the primary vehicular connection to Hazelton must be at our easternmost property line The plan that we have submitted clearly responds to all the forces in both of the bullet point lists above. It solves the puzzle of constructing in phases, negotiating grade changes, maintaining temporary site access for retail operations, separating construction traffic from retail traffic, creating a distinct residential neighborhood on the Promenade, separating housing and retail traffic flow, improving vehicular access to and through the site, creating a gathering place on France Avenue, providing adequate screened dockage, enhancing the Promenade and linking residential activity directly to it as has been the goal of the Planning Commission in other recent projects (i.e. Target). and providing reasonable separation between private amenities and public space. The push and pull of the various forces is a huge planning challenge, and there are no perfect solutions. The plan we have submitted is product of compromise, but it is a very good plan, and we do not believe that a significantly better option exists. Several sit -down sessions with city staff during the development of the plan also affirmed our approach. Staff has been extremely supportive, saying that this plan responds well to all the Sketch Plan input. With these things in mind we have revised the plans to provide stronger and safer pedestrian connections, and to make other improvements as well. The following changes will be included in the presentation materials for the meeting on the 13th of March: 1. A primary pedestrian pathway, distinguished from other sidewalks, has been established in a broadened space, allowing a wider path and more interesting course of travel between the Promenade and Byerly's. Benches and public gathering spaces are provided along the way. 2. One vehicular crossing has been eliminated on the north side of Building B's retail lot. 3. The pathway connection at the Promenade has been strengthened, creating a feature with benches and signage that provides a gateway to our development, and clearer way finding. 4. A covered walkway, extending from the Byerly's entry through the parking lot to the south, will provide shelter for shoppers arriving in cars and by other means. 5. The water feature that has always been part of the planning, is now clearly illustrated, along with a-'.",. pathway and footbridge connection for residents from Building A/B parking garage (where bikes are stored), directly to the Promenade. N, • o�tio�i 7171 France Ave. Redevelopment March 6, 2013 6. High translucent windows have been added to the west and east elevations of the Byerly's Store, bringing additional daylight into the Produce and Deli areas. 7. The dock screen wall design has been revised to include additional materials, and landscaping has been added. 8. We affirm the east elevation of Housing Building C, at street level, is incomplete. We have discussed using that location for public art or enhancing it in other ways, but we are not prepared to commit to any particular solution at this time. Since Building C construction is still out several years, we request approval of the site plan, with the development of Building C being conditioned upon final design review. We believe these revisions strengthen the project as a whole, and in particular the connection of residents and pedestrians to the Promenade. We have attached a revised site plan, and will bring additional exhibits illustrating the changes proposed. If there are questions in advance of the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact Jim Vos of Cresa Partners, Greg Anderson of Anderson /KM Builders, or Matt Masica, my colleague at Pope Architects. Again, my apologies for not being able to attend. Sincerely, POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. IN Paul Holmes Principal Cary Teague From: Cary Teague Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 2:51 PM To: Jim Vos Ovos @cresa.com) Ovos @cresa.com); Greg Anderson (ganderson @anderson- km.com) Cc: Kevin Staunton (kevin @stauntonlaw.com); Scott Neal; 'James Hovland' Ohovland @krausehovland.com) Subject: Byerly's Redevelopment Plans Hi Jim and Greg, Per our phone conversation yesterday, below is a summary of the concerns and issues that were raised by the Planning Commission at last Wednesday's meeting. The Planning Commission Chair has reviewed and contributed to the summary below. Primary Concerns Pedestrian connections. The commission is looking to find ways to make the site more welcoming to pedestrians, signal to motorists that they are sharing the space with pedestrians, and better facilitate pedestrian movement from the Promenade and the apartment buildings to the attractive 2 -story Byerly's. "destination" on France Avenue and back. The commission is open to any designs that can accomplish those goals. Reducing the number of times that pedestrians are required to cross drive lanes and converting "sidewalks" to widened and landscaped "walkways" that make them more inviting and signal to motorists that they are sharing the space are two possible ways to approach achieving the goal. Ultimately, the commission is looking for a site plan that makes the pedestrian experience a primary feature that the uses are linked to rather than vice - versa. Such a pedestrian oriented design is specifically identified in the city's PUD ordinance as a way to justify departures from the usual zoning code requirements. Sustainability. The commission is looking for ways to ensure that laudable sustainability ideas become measurable sustainability commitments. One way to do this is to link proposed sustainability initiatives to standard energy codes or other measurable standards so that we can determine that (as the city's PUD Ordinance puts it) the sustainability elements are "exceeding the city's standards." You could commit to LEED certification or commit to being XX% better than existing energy codes. The commission welcomes any ideas about how to demonstrate a genuinely sustainable design that goes above and beyond what is required in non -PUD situations. Engaging the Promenade. The commission wants to see more about how the project is integrated with the Promenade. While the water feature is an intriguing idea that might dovetail with some sustainability objectives, it should not be pursued if it has the effect of creating a barrier between the Promenade and the development. Some of the commission's concerns may be addressed by providing additional graphics illustrating your plans for this area but the commission would also like to hear about how you intend to interface with the Promenade in a way that helps create a special pedestrian experience for both the residents of your development and those passing by or traveling to it. Other Concerns North elevation of Byerly's. Brick wall along Hazelton. Should engage the street. Consider windows or glazing that could provide visual features that better engage the street as well as provide more natural light into the store. Building C. Proximity to Hazelton and mass /setback. Site Plan. Design the pedestrian plan first, and then locate buildings. Consider two taller apartment buildings rather than three. Loading Dock. The commission recognizes that some site circumstances may require the Byerly's to be located at the corner of the site adjacent to France and Hazelton and that such a location also requires the loading dock to be located near that corner. The commission is looking for you to explore creative ways to screen or divert attention from that understandably necessary feature. Consider a connection to the Promenade on the south lot line. w91�11� o� e • r�uont� �eee PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague February 27, 2013 VLE Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Lund Food Holdings is proposing to tear down the existing 59,000 Byerly's grocery store, located at 7171 France Avenue and build the following: Phase 1 ➢ A new 47,000 square foot Byerly's store. ➢ A six/seven -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking. ➢ A six/seven -story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking. Phase 2 ➢ A six - story, 60 -unit apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. In building the first phase, the new Byerly's store would be constructed in the parking lot of the existing store at the northwest corner of the site, and Building A would be constructed. The existing store would remain open. When the new store is finished the existing store would be removed, and then Buildings B & C would be constructed. (See the property location on pages A1—A6; the applicant's narrative on pages A25 —A27; the building renderings on pages A28— A41; and site plans on pages A42 —A58.) To accommodate this proposed redevelopment, the following is requested: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; ➢ Preliminary Development Plan; and ➢ Preliminary Plat This "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should these "preliminary" requests be approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Development Plan, Final Rezoning and Final Plat review which would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the sketch plans on pages A7 —A8; and the minutes from those meetings on pages A16 —A24.) The applicant has developed the proposed plans by attempting to address the issues raised by the Planning Commission and City Council. Some of the most significant changes include: ➢ Bringing the Byerly's store up to France Avenue. ➢ Relocation the loading dock away from the Promenade. ➢ Project embracing the Promenade. ➢ Better pedestrian connections. ➢ Providing some sustainable concepts. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Rue De France retail center; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided Mixed Use. Easterly: Vacant restaurant; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and Mixed Use. Southerly: Macy's Home Store; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and Mixed Use. Westerly: Sunrise senior living; zoned PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential and guided Office /Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 9.67 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains Byerly's Grocery Store with a large parking lot in front. (See pages A3 —A4 and A6.) Planning Guide Plan designation: MXC — Mixed Use Center. Zoning: PCD -3, Planned Commercial District (See page A5.) 2 Site Circulation Access to the site would be from France Avenue and Hazelton Road. A new right -in and right -out would be added at the south lot line on France Avenue. Hennepin County is agreeable to this new access point. There are two existing access points on Hazelton Road. These would be slightly adjusted. A future stop light is planned for the easternmost access point, and has been realigned to match the access to the north. The property owner to the west is not agreeable at this time to this arrangement. This intersection could be shifted to the east to be off the adjacent parcel. City staff would prefer the proposed alignment to match the access across the street to the north. (See page A45.) The westernmost access on Hazelton Road would be a right -in and right -out only. Extensive pedestrian paths are planned for the site. Along France Avenue and Hazelton Road, a sidewalk would be constructed with green space separating them from traffic. An interior sidewalk is planned from the France Avenue sidewalk, to the east in front of the Byerly's store, to the south side of Building C, and east to connect to the Promenade. (See page A43 & A45.) An additional connection to the Promenade is available along the south lot line. (See page A45.) Sidewalks are also proposed around each of the housing buildings to provide pedestrian connections to the France and Hazelton Road sidewalks and the Promenade. (See page A43 & A45.) Traffic & Parking Study RLK Incorporated is conducting a parking and traffic study. (See the attached draft of the study dated January 16, 2013.) The Study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. The document attached to this report is a draft of the study. RLK is anticipating completing the study this week. Representatives from RLK and Wayne Houle, the City's director of engineering will be at the Planning Commission meeting to present the study and answer any questions. Once staff receives the updated study it will be emailed out to the Commissioners prior to the meeting. The proposed new right -in and right -out on France Avenue would greatly benefit traffic operations around the site. The level of service on adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. The Study further concludes that the project would have adequate parking. Based on the proposal for 67,950 square feet of retail and 246 apartment units, 357 spaces are required for the retail, 18 bike parking stalls, and 246 enclosed units for the apartments. The applicant is proposing 314 spaces for the retail space and 357 enclosed and 33 surface stalls for the apartments. Bike racks are show at the entrances of each retail building. A shared parking 3 arrangement between all the lots for parking and drive aisle access would be established by a blanket easement over the properties. A parking study was done for the proposed project, which has concluded that the amount of parking provided would adequately serve the proposed development. (See the attached draft parking study by RLK.) A specific breakdown of the parking for each proposed lot is as follows: Lot 1 (Byerly's) _ .190 stalls proposed (252 required) Lot 2 & 3 (Housing A &B + retail) = 285 enclosed proposed + 72 surface proposed (183 enclosed required + 62 surface retail required.) Lot 4 (Housing C + retail) = 89 surface proposed + 72 enclosed proposed (62 surface retail required + 60 enclosed and required.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 68 over story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing 98 over story trees. They would include a mixture of Maple, Lindens, Oak, Crabapple and Spruce. (See pages A43, A49 —A50.) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed, around the buildings. Final Landscaping would be more closely reviewed with the Final Development Plan. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures The proposed plans would locate the loading area on the east side of the building along Hazelton Road. (See proposed location on page A43.) This is similar to the arrangement of the loading dock for the recently construction Whole Foods to the south on France Avenue. The loading area would be screened from Hazelton with a brick wall that would match the building. (See page A32, A43 & A49.) Additional landscaping is also proposed along Hazelton to screen the loading area from the Hazelton and adjacent property. This is an improvement over the current location of the loading dock facing the Promenade, and the plans reviewed during the Sketch Plan, which were also facing the Promenade. (See previous Sketch Plan on page A7 & A8.) Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be generally acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A61. A developer's agreement would be required for the 4 construction of the proposed sidewalks, public water main, sewer and any other public improvements. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City's review authority over the grading of the site. A more detailed review would be done at Final Development Plan. It should be mentioned that the water feature, as recommended in the Promenade Plan, is not specifically designed in the grading plan. (See Promenade Plan on pages A9 —A15.) The Promenade Plan ponding area is located on a high point on the site, and therefore, was difficult to get drainage to flow naturally to that spot. The applicant is indicating that roof storm water could be routed to the area, if the City constructed the pond. (See page A26 of the applicant narrative.) Lighting The applicant has indicated that all site lighting would conform to City Code requirements. Pole lights, 25 feet tall would be used to light the parking lot areas, and 14 foot tall decorative fixtures would light pedestrian walkways. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices would include lenses, reflectors or shades so as to limit light spill and glare on to adjacent properties. A detailed lighting plan would be required for the Final Development Plan review. Building /Building Material The Byerly's would be constructed of brick on all four sides, with a stone base and concrete panels. (See rendering on pages A8 —A9.) The apartment buildings would be constructed of metal panels, cement fiber panels, large windows, pre -cast concrete. The applicant believes that the mass of the building walls, in particular the west and north elevations, have been broken up by the variety of brick and concrete proposed as well as the landscaping anticipated in front. The applicant will present a visual elevation that shows the building and the landscaping together at the Planning Commission meeting. Signage The underlying zoning of the property would be PCD -3, therefore, would be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. Staff would recommend a full signage plan be submitted as part of the Final Development Plan. Plans should specifically include location and size of pylon signs and way finding signage. Specific signage regulations would be incorporated into the PUD Zoning District including way finding signage. Density The proposed density would be 24 units per acre would be toward -the lower middle end of the density range for the City's high density residential development as indicated in the table on the following page. Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69th & York Apartments 3121 691h Street 114 30 Preliminary Plat The applicant is also requesting a Preliminary Plat to create separate lots for each of the proposed buildings. (See the plat on page A44.) The site exists as two lots today; the proposed subdivision would create four lots. The subdivision would meet all minimum lot standards and subdivision requirements. Shared parking and drive -aisle agreements would need to be established across the four lots. Park Dedication Per Minnesota State Statute 462.353, Subd. 4(a) and Section 810.13 of the City Code, the applicant is required to dedicate land for public use as parks, playgrounds, recreation facilities, trails, or public open space. Per Section 810.13. Subd. 5 of the City Code, the fees in lieu of land dedication is $5,000 per dwelling unit. The development would create 246 new dwelling units; therefore, a $1,230,000 parking dedication would be required. A portion of the park dedication funds could be used to develop the water feature, as shown on the Promenade Plans on pages A9 —A15. 0 The fee would be paid prior to the City's release of the signed final plat mylars or subdivision approval for recording with Hennepin County. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 850.04. Subd. 4 D provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; 7 g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and. i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. A patio is proposed along France at the front of Byerly's, and the front walkway in front of the building would be covered with a canopy. (See page A32.) The store configuration is similar to the recently constructed Whole Foods, except that there is an entry into the store closer to France Avenue. (See page A43 & A52.) Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. (See sidewalk plan on pages A43 & A45.) The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. (See pages A25— A27a.) The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. (See pages A29 —A35.) The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. 8 The proposed uses, retail and multiple - family residential housing are uses allowed in the Mixed Use Center, as described in the Comprehensive Plan, and within the underlying PCD -3 Zoning District. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: L where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages the mixing of retail and multi- family residential uses. The proposed plans are therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Again, the proposal is for a mixture of land uses. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As indicated in table earlier within this report, and the fact that the site is located in a commercial area on France Avenue and the Promenade, the proposed density of 24 units per acre is appropriate for this site. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the underlying PCD -3 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone this site to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and 9 number of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. Please note that a few.City Standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The site layout would be improved by bringing the building up to the street; pedestrian connections would be incorporated through and around the site, including green space between the road and the sidewalk; locating the taller buildings farther back from France Avenue, into the site; introducing a mixture of uses on the site. The design of the building is of a high quality. Byerly's would be brick on all four sides, with a stone base and concrete panels. (See rendering on pages A29 —A35.) The apartment buildings would be constructed of metal panels, cement fiber panels, large windows, pre -cast concrete. The development would incorporate improved landscaping and green space. Traffic would be improved in the area with a right -in and right -out on France Avenue. 10 Compliance Table Would require a variance under PCD -3 Zoning 11 City Standard (PCD -1) Proposed Building Setbacks Byerly's Front — France Avenue 50 feet 51 feet Side Street — Hazelton Road 50 feet 26 feet* Side — South NA 200+ feet Rear — East (Promenade) NA 200+ feet Building A Front — France Avenue 81 feet 500+ feet Side Street — Hazelton Road 81 feet 300+ feet Side — South NA 41 feet Rear — East (Promenade) 81 feet 27 feet* Building B Front — France Avenue 85 feet 300+ feet Side Street — Hazelton Road 85 feet 200+ feet Side — South NA NA Rear — East (Promenade) 85 feet 200+ feet Building C Front — France Avenue 79 feet 300+ feet Side Street — Hazelton Road 79 feet 43 feet* Side — South NA NA Rear — East (Promenade) 79 feet 200+ feet Parking Lot Setbacks Front — France Avenue 20 feet 51 feet Front — Hazelton Road 20 feet 20 feet Side — North & East NA NA Building Height Byerly's One story — 21 feet Building A Eight stories or 108 feet Six/seven stories — 81 feet Building B Six/seven stories — 85 feet Building C Six stories — 79 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50% 72 %* Lot size = 9.67 acres 303,025 s.f. Parking Stalls Retail 67,950 s.f. = 357 spaces 314 spaces retail* Housing 246 units = 246 enclosed units 357 enclosed & 33 surface Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Would require a variance under PCD -3 Zoning 11 PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 2. The proposed six/seven -story buildings are two -three stories lower than the height allowed by City Code, and would fit into this area. They are consistent with some of the high density residential development to the east and south. 3. The existing roadways would support the project. RLK conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. The proposed new right -in and right -out on France Avenue would greatly benefit traffic operations around the site. The level of service on adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. 4. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for 12 guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. d. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. • Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site. As highlighted above on pages 6 -9, the proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. 2. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. A patio is proposed along France at the front of Byerly's, and the front walkway in front of the building would be covered with a canopy. (See page A32.) The store configuration is similar to the recently constructed Whole Foods, except that there is an entry into the store closer to France Avenue. (See page A43 & A52.) 3. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. (See sidewalk plan on pages A43 & A45.) 4. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. (See pages A25— A27a.) 5. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. (See pages A29 —A35.) 6. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 13 7. Ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. Staff Recommendation Preliminary Rezoning to PUD & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD- 3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to build a new 47,000 square foot Byerly's store; a six -story 106 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a six -story, 77- unit'apartment building with first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking; and a six -story, 60 -unit apartment building with 1.0,500 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. 5. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. 6. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. 7. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. 8. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 14 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. *Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. d. Encourage infiIUredevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character.. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated January 28, 2012, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. Final Development plans should include specific locations of trash enclosure areas, number of bike parking spaces provided, and where loading /deliveries are made to the retail space and apartments. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. MFl 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way -finding signage, and wall signage. 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated February 22, 2013. 6. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. Subdivision — Preliminary Plat Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat to create a new four lot subdivision at 7171 France for the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 3. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 4. The Park Dedication fee of $1,230,00 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Deadline for a city decision: May 21, 2013 16 A f Edina City of Legend i �• �. `� Ceks , ■ lilll. i � Mlle... a� � ♦�.,�ac �� � � � i I�iiiiii1111 111�� %:1 ►� „� e� . .,.....ME r i11 � ,,.. .. ■, ..■■ a _ .s ■ag■■ •ai US mm, 1 ai ■ ��� / / / // /r��: ■■ •■■ a■ �■ OEM uui Millis - IIIIIII�� VIII: � 1/�:`�,�i■� `v-J■■ '�� C 0 000• 7171 France Ave S • I �r Edina, MN 55435 �-4 f iris City of Edina G516 8925 '256520 E924 360311 1 ES13 Legend Surroull3lmg House !,'umber 6324 5973 6050 = °216P1 6921 ,��n.t Easels E917 4030 1950. 69x9 d9al 1• 391 8999. 3480 �' 3210 ,' 6`75 E9^�6933 6929 31C0 6977fi911 E923 tbuw ItiumSar L.W. 6939- 6945 H94: 0915 Slraat tame Labafa _ a r. 7 {CO r, 7C517C.0 IC01 •I s'T'_ 7s�9+. . Imo 7 7C,1^97{Ce. 7CC9 CAy Lirttils 7C?6 j7CC57CO3 7CC5 d , �r`7 7[.147 1� iJl° `1 Gaeks 7[68 70057CC8 7C49 70137 7J15 7 '.� 7000 ' : O Lake 1\eit110Y 701J•., 70f E. '.1C 7G1 Y f j7c y,` Mel 2511 .; 33%0529170 n Lakes 57fa1' 1 DO 7107 4.^iCl 7'71 —"r l I ( "S , �J- 1 u��� �I _, '• l �'''� - - Parks O P3YCek 7104 7� I�8 (, �.i r t � �^ � . , iL 3Qa5 2911 2009 Aa1�l Phato 2a 1117111 __ _ _„�.. -• -C -' - � r I �• az07 a 20 - I ^. 712 171'0 1217120 I ij•?t 71 57124 1257124. J�' %. 11��� --r-`' oll :`I - 4� 5 I I i i • 11257128.. 712128 _• - �� ?'•�•� I� "' I - �k `i 120172LW 72017207 1 - 4 T (y Y4 'I 6 ]] �, L Hwy,.• IV Owl j�.yiaC � �.. �. .: 1C 1J�''-'�61A.a1��'R• X17 �� a' Ver..�" oa21 2 IIC9pt. 711 a q +K C792a. 29,4 7 292] }- 7373 t* -_ 21115 20 J77 �+-. s !A241"�311 7 7401 x]401 7400 74057ati7 T405. .05,7�Oa 7^1[97.4' 74[9 -,�� �+,•.��`� � .,Y.� .�./•_ �,r V � 3 _ 24 '••171f.1---=•ttt 1 - ' � -0B ' � 7a 09 T408 74157414 7415 301 7424 7421 � 7 � � ' PY A17 - y 1s: ~��i•, 7. • "` • I - r. 14 27 ` S '257430 7- !333432 743] x297433 7 4397436 7439 141 - ,- > * i y/l �.3] 7478 74+5 7.44 7445 ^ ••�, v }' _ �./s K � ry_ •� r 75,E _ '515,7 514 75 15 7921 7 x 7521 7512 12 7527r7526 7527 4200 44 4 L 7573 7572 7537 ?516 753975 1539 rs..mrt+waas ee /O.:Ll .ocaSGG�x '"' � - � PID: 3202824220009 7s' O 7171 France Ave S Sidt� a Edina, MN 55435 -�cr,1j7o3r..t� nlll+ _ iris City of Edina it Legend ng Flu use liumbar Surlvvn H �.-tl __ •i_ 'r y �. t. W. �� ., jj Labels may- •• r If ,Il 1 t 1� 1 Illlfd 14e1 V.r. q Muu�_ Number Lahets CRYL"s 1. crib �� iii !.J[ i }� Tsr .� I. 0ffll�tf ri a fnl �.� Lake Itarres _ •r'_ �,r [ It[1[K Hrti[Ff,t w�. 'ti S _t _ Lak es nParks ♦kYw• 1 ref 1 ♦ , 'flit 1 " Peak 20179 Aerial Pholo ,]L it! }, •♦ 1!• c E .. 7. t rte,, ��►'._I ♦i r I , .r - rl $ f k F ♦� if Y I.Ir`.I' iC S. infl f E e r. U4 11 1 1 '+ [� t_ Y of � r r sr .. _ r .F - f s aim ^;tR< v!" 1 i 1 A. lilt • ,��; ::: Ir Vt + )235 1 ice" IF I tF e— R`1 1 f T - GALI.AGXER DP F •� 4c • `)13~ �ffiC 1 Q 1 !. �`.,',-yk [w. *i I� illi Elo ; e F 115 614 717 1111 612 ` 715' 713 - y ^2.1 Iill 6[G 2," I_r •Ilan E�e 71f A, o� PID: 3202824220009 �r0� r, 7171 France Ave S t tis'd ti�re U L. Edina, MN 55435 l-,i�a1R Fl.•M1 tt mun i . � ~ P ya City of Edina PID:3202824220009 7171 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 A5-- 2Qykl'^ Legend Straal Na— Labels .J G1y Lmis f/ Gaeks Lake Names CJ Lake. Parks Zaailg OMOO AP]tAVVnmle ?r0..i�m- 4Caat4;.of Oed�ves O:srr.F ® 47caWV -0 am D 1 ® PCa•2 SPa.rsl C-- ® xasta.,,oaCa..����a..v:cl . PJalP.ar. dJ- 3-4 DP -'J., tp -a 06— e}—1 D.;'M 2,P— AOS-la .a; ■ PRO I t?raiaadreYar. r. ® PR0,2 tf1 mf aesleaO�c: ® PR3-3tP„ .n ® PRO AJR- 4a— m�:.�.::. -- ■ PSR.(P —WSe.v O. . a Ij5e.J�as►yVnp ■ RMO4Rl"o tMde:: ^.a: Para k 2Qykl'^ Li JL A �a Aerial view from SE Byerly's Edina Mn 02/21/12 r ANDERSON ' • KM BUILDERS Comprehensive Building 6 Development Services I I I w I z Uj LU Q © z I� LJ_ �b I I � I HAZELTON ROAD ... - 0 Ov 0 V 40 PARKING SPACES @ 9`0- RAMP . ,IiI Ii:V i v- Q i P ■ i• j �� Is 0 r C{ V, (CW RFDI -�' t: NEW DRIVE -- - i- i- 1�Tr- I- ITI- i- I�"�- 1_.T_i�_TI� f T \1 I -T ��r_f_L_r f--1- r 1- T1 -t -1 �11T7 -� l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II•:L I I I I I I I I I IAN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING MACY'S SITE 1 I I I - F+I- I +H +H + f-I +H+ "A -fH H kli -Hi - I Fri I SITE PLAN Nate, POND DATA SUMMARY HousingA 125,100 sf 96 units Housing B (future) 84,800 sf 67 units Byerly's 51,800 sf Retail (future) 19,000 sf PARKING SUMMARY 5[RVICE SUPPORT 147 PARKING SPACES @ 9' -0" parking provided Housing 1 I FUTURE RETAIL I STORY w I 19,000 SS J r`ouslNG opor/ IJI ����I REtouTEo COMMON , PYLON SIGN FUTURE HOUSING 101 67 UNM — 229 PARKING SPACES @ 9'-6" 1-s TONY STORY = I { =1 I I I I I_I l l I K ,1�E�f' 46 ODO SF . 5,800 SF MEZZ RAMP . ,IiI Ii:V i v- Q i P ■ i• j �� Is 0 r C{ V, (CW RFDI -�' t: NEW DRIVE -- - i- i- 1�Tr- I- ITI- i- I�"�- 1_.T_i�_TI� f T \1 I -T ��r_f_L_r f--1- r 1- T1 -t -1 �11T7 -� l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II•:L I I I I I I I I I IAN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING MACY'S SITE 1 I I I - F+I- I +H +H + f-I +H+ "A -fH H kli -Hi - I Fri I SITE PLAN Nate, POND DATA SUMMARY HousingA 125,100 sf 96 units Housing B (future) 84,800 sf 67 units Byerly's 51,800 sf Retail (future) 19,000 sf PARKING SUMMARY parkingreq parking provided Housing (1.5 /unit) garage surface � - HOUSING 7-S TORY UNITS 9fi UNITS �`�11J�11 i 96 Housing B (future) 67 units 101 BY 1-s TONY STORY 245 146 46 ODO SF . 5,800 SF MEZZ Retail 51, Boosl' RAMP . ,IiI Ii:V i v- Q i P ■ i• j �� Is 0 r C{ V, (CW RFDI -�' t: NEW DRIVE -- - i- i- 1�Tr- I- ITI- i- I�"�- 1_.T_i�_TI� f T \1 I -T ��r_f_L_r f--1- r 1- T1 -t -1 �11T7 -� l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II•:L I I I I I I I I I IAN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING MACY'S SITE 1 I I I - F+I- I +H +H + f-I +H+ "A -fH H kli -Hi - I Fri I SITE PLAN Nate, POND DATA SUMMARY HousingA 125,100 sf 96 units Housing B (future) 84,800 sf 67 units Byerly's 51,800 sf Retail (future) 19,000 sf PARKING SUMMARY 00 , t•,tv� ^^ l o i Byerly's Edina Mn l / I I 02/22/12 ANDERSON ' • KM BUILP'_'� Comprehensive Building & De,,I,pme. parkingreq parking provided Housing (1.5 /unit) garage surface HousingA 96 units 144 96 Housing B (future) 67 units 101 50 245 146 119 Retail Byerly's 51,800 sf 277 Retail (future) 19,000 sf, 95 372 354 total required 617 I total provided 619 00 , t•,tv� ^^ l o i Byerly's Edina Mn l / I I 02/22/12 ANDERSON ' • KM BUILP'_'� Comprehensive Building & De,,I,pme. � 0 bliferia S in Center Figure 33 Promenade 10 It r Component Plan 4 WOW 70th St. Promenade Design I fE Vitt%, ■ in "f Legend '0� 10 � Gateway , Crossroads Feature Brandon uar'e c 6'M Landscaping Feature lop of I pop X_ Single Sculpture It G w i ta f fl I fvft . Sculpture Group CUPP F'91 t V Hazelton Rd. IL 7 Sculpture _191 _4� 6, _7 Fountain zz J zef h, 6 M, (7"-f 7. Pond /Stream Star`' T__ SE' .4 and Fountain r1k ' Yorktown Retail Cent6r'— < 'd". 2.- Byerlyi York kAve. • • Underpass r r I 14 f I 11111 vP Ff 'York Plaz'a , re &.13MC,000 to, tro, 'W-72 .47 V II 8■ rrrrrr 1 1T V I IM 0 100 300 Feet MW%16666?MMM9 (b EDINA PROMENADE Urban Design Plan July 2007 UM to' %inii, ry 0 ve to, tro, 'W-72 .47 V II 8■ rrrrrr 1 1T V I IM 0 100 300 Feet MW%16666?MMM9 (b EDINA PROMENADE Urban Design Plan July 2007 UM r 55 Figure 41 Stormwater Pond I Stream Concept Promenade Design PQIMENAOff ?L*P 0 50 100 150 Feet fi& EDINA rROMFNADf Urban Design Plan July 2007 w`, I um Lakes 11111111" 1 fY`iviA WC tenni Lakes s11H1" 1 014,46 11111111" I 58 Figure 43 Stormwater Pond Stream Concept - Circulation Options Promenade Design W (b EDINA I'ROMENADF Urban Design Plan July 2007 • fill i OF i m. 1w { t AL r " r ++� -. cr VOW y. t :' Promenade ' - Concepts Recommended ._.ir '�•:s. �': -! Promenade 70th St. _ _ •; Components r.;. !�• � � y s, ::sue' -��T„ � MII 1 ; n���. 1111• I i--1 1 RMI11' -, � + '�!�F . October 15.1006 } , Mar r � dI Legend � „ �fi ?I r•••,�r':r' �. � it X Gateway • K r ` '" x -a_ _. a �y • f . ' i; Special Feature !. 4, . ",=" R.'- :IV .�-- � 1 ;f�� WaterFeature- ' N "� Special Fountain ^, wW-i -;'- Water Feature - __= Fountain r AWN. 1mw1 r q v •fi z J I, 1 � k - It / AL .� I A, {{ 1 �. ' rJ• a' ,P Landscaping Feature Sculpture Group Single Sculpture Path-Oriented Devebprneent N 0 100 300 Feet m rmmm� Path 1 Transit System Study Edina, Minnesota O7. • N 0 i�� jl'Jllj--�/t;a�� 32 0 Jf :r F�.iaIut"Ge — L' .`.1 1 l.6u/ltalll c;:pith r ;T. zi lli ", V, B. Promenade Path Recommendations i r 3. Water Feature - Sculpture Fountain ti ✓MIT j V ' - t -•rat. f.. MW r on ar P,C. M400105 Vice -Chair Staunton reported ic hearing for preliminary plat approval for JMS Custom Homes 120 v ha s been continued to March 28, 2012. . REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Sketch Plan Review — 6500 France Avenue South, Edina, MN Vice -Chair Staunton explained the Sketch Plan Review process was new to the Commission and its purpose was to give developers the opportunity to share their ideas with the Commission and Council without the expense of providing full plans. Vice -Chair Staunton said at this time he is suggesting that the Commission comment on the Sketch Plan review in a structured form that encompasses three topics. 11.and Use; 2) Site Plan; 3) Design Features. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reported that the Planning Commission was asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the Byerly's site at 7171 France Avenue. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing Byerly's store and build a new 52,000 square foot Byerly's with a 96 unit 7 -story apartment on top, and a second 19,000 square foot retail building with a 67 unit apartment on-top. Parking for the building would be underneath the retail space. Loading areas would be behind the buildings facing the Promenade. (See page A8.) Primary access to the site would be off Hazelton Road,•with.a secondary access off France through the Macy's site to the south. The existing property is zoned PCD -3, which allows.retail as a permitted use, and multi - residential uses are conditionally permitted. (See page A5.) The applicant would be seeking a rezoning of the property to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The applicant is requesting a Sketch Plan review to solicit comments from the Planning Commission and City Council. Opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the Planning Commission and City Council shall be considered advisory only, and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. Should the City decide to rezone these sites to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and number of parking stalls would become the standards for the site. . Planner Aaker observed while the proposal would be an improvement over the existing Page 5 of 11 44 building and use on the site, staff is not sure that the proposal would rise to the level of meeting the purpose and intent of the PUD above. The proposal is more typical of traditional suburban development, and does not create a pedestrian friendly environment or engage the adjacent streets or the Promenade. Boulevard style sidewalks along France and Hazelton Road should be added. Due to the retaining wall along France, the sidewalk may need to be located above the retaining wall, with set of stairs to get to the bus stop. Connections from the retail uses to these sidewalks should also be required in addition to the full connection to the Promenade. Aaker also reported that a traffic study would need to be completed to determine impacts on adjacent roadways and the city engineer has expressed concern in regard to sewer capacity in the area. This issue would have to be examined closely as part of a formal submittal. Upgrades to the system, and cost sharing for those upgrades may be required. Appearing for the Applicant Greg Anderson, Anderson KM Builders Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson introduced the development team; Paul Holmes, Pope Architects and Jennifer Kent / Lunds. Mr. Anderson explained that Lunds Food is considering redeveloping their 9.67 acre site in two phases. Anderson said at present the site contains a 59,000 sq. ft. Byerly's grocery store. Continuing, Anderson explained that the intent of Phase I is to redevelop the site to include a.51,800 sq. ft. replacement of the Byerly's store with seven levels of market rate apartments above. Phase 2 would include constructing a 19,000 sq. ft. one level retail space with seven levels of market rate apartments above. Anderson said what's challenging about this redevelopment is that Byerly's would remain open during construction. Anderson also noted that at this time the project hasn't "signed" a residential partner; however those discussions are in the process. Continuing, Anderson told the Commission in discussions with Byerly's it became apparent that it was very important to them that the stores main entrance orients toward France Avenue. Anderson also informed the Commission Byerly's has had discussions with Macy's on shared opportunities including access. Paul Holms said in designing the project the buildings will address both France Avenue and the "Promenade" with the housing elements focusing on the Promenade, retail France Avenue. Holms pointed out that in reality the project is a mixed use project. Retail space would be oriented toward France Avenue and housing toward the promenade. With graphics Holms asked the Commission to note the location of the loading dock, adding the goal Page 6 of 11 AO is to shield the loading dock from both the promenade and residential aspect of the project. He added that plans to screen the dock will become firmer when a residential partner is on board. Discussion on Applicant Presentation Commissioner Fischer questioned the east /west orientation and south location of the new Byerly's building and asked the developers if this configuration was the result of the current grocery store having to remain open and the existing utility easement. Mr. Holms responded in the affirmative adding that grades also played a role in building configuration and placement. Continuing, Holms said another factor in building orientation and location was to separate the retail parking from the residential parking. Holms said another important aspect of the design was to eliminate semi - trucks from a front loading dock. A "front" loading mini dock would serve the deli and the rear dock semi - trucks. Fischer noted over the past few years the Commission has encouraged developers to design their buildings up to the street, adding in this instance the buildings are pulled away from the street similar to what exists today. Continuing, Fischer acknowledged this discrepancy; however he indicated he understands to be successful requirements for a large freestanding grocery store is different. Commissioner Schroeder said his question is broad. He explained that the City recently adopted a PUD process. This process was put in place to enable developers and the City to achieve something they couldn't achieve through the regular rezoning process. Schroeder asked the applicant what the community gets from this; what's the benefit. Mr. Holms responded that the proposed multiple land uses and added density are of benefit by establishing a direct connection between retail and housing. This connection not only enhances the immediate area but the City as well by adding to the tax base. Mr. Anderson told the Commission through this proposal Lund's would be investing in the community at large. Anderson noted that Lund's could proceed by building only a new grocery store; however they chose to redevelop the site as presented. Anderson pointed out that the existing Byerly's is tired and if the project were approved the community would get a new piece of real estate and expanded tax base. Commissioner Scherer said when she first viewed the sketch plan she was struck by . the proposed use. Scherer asked if there was still a market for this type multi housing project. Mr. Anderson responded that Lund's retained a market analysis firm and they found that market rate rental property is in demand. Commissioner Carpenter said that while he agrees that market rate apartments are now in demand, he's not sure how that will fair in the long term. Mr. Anderson responded that it's hard for him to know if this is a risk, adding there's always a risk in development; you can either be ahead of the curve or behind it. Page 7 of 11 A KI Commissioner Platteter asked if Lund's ever considered acquiring the restaurant to its immediate east. Mr. Anderson reported that Lund's has been in contact with that owner; however, at this time the discussion is in the preliminary stage and a deal hasn't been struck. Vice- Chair Staunton said at this time the discussion would focus on the proposed land use. Commissioners expressed the following: • Support the mixed use aspect of the project — use is good • Building height doesn't appear to be an issue. • Suggest that the developer study the ordinance as it relates to mixed use and implement those goals and standards. • Consider encouraging a more active environment — use imagination; such as an outlet for local artists to display their art, etc. • Make it stellar. • Lingering concern on the housing market. • Develop the site with vision; how will it be relevant 10 -20 years from now. • Create an area where people want to live, work and shop. • Embrace the importance of the Promenade. • Create a village feel. • Create a space where people want to stay and where they don't have to drive. • Ensure that the site is developed in such a way that it provides a positive experience for the people already there —the shopper's at Byerly's etc. • Create an example of how people gather. Have this be a positive experience for all; not just the residents of the project. • Consider a public purpose for this area by creating go to and stay at areas within the site that encourages them to stay. • Look at how to maximize the lobby and entrances by creating meeting spaces. • Create better access throughout the site; especially to France Avenue. There appears to be no change from the France Avenue perspective. • Consider relocating the main loading dock area; or at the very least screen it from the Promenade. Mr. Anderson asked Commissioners if their concern about providing inviting "public space" was for the residents of the proposed housing or for the general public. Commissioner Schroeder responded that his intent would be for the developer to create an attractive place for everyone, retail patrons, residents of the project and the public at large. He added he doesn't know how that would translate but would like to see it happen. Commissioners agreed, adding opportunities to gather should be encouraged and can be created. Vice -Chair Staunton introduced discussion on the "site plan ". Commissioners expressed the following: Page 8 of 11 4m • There appears to be a lot of distance from France Avenue to the stores entrance, soften this. • Keep the pedestrian in mind. Commissioners reiterated there's a lot of space between the front door of the proposed stores and France Avenue. /Hazelton • Create a place for bicycles. • Concern was expressed on sewer capacity — ensure that it's sufficient and a ? on who pays for it if it needs to be increased. • Note that Edina is moving toward the "Living Street" concept; keep that in mind with redesign. • Consider separating the housing from the retail — more housing along the Promenade. • Keep in mind ordinance requirements for utility equipment. (placement, screening, noise etc.) • Could the number of parking spaces be reduced; has compact parking ever been considered to preserve green space. Ms. Kent responded that the width of Byerly's parking spaces is part of their branding and she doesn't believe those.standards would be relaxed; however that can be discussed. • Suggest better integration of the large vehicle loading dock into the site. • Support the use of rain gardens. • Reiterate the importance of promoting pedestrian access through the large front parking areas. Consider relief islands, a front expanded patio, pedestrian walkways /aisles to the bus stop area on France. Tie into the Promenade. • Remember ADA standards — are there stairs and a ramp from the parking lot onto the sidewalk to France Avenue /bus stop. Is there even a sidewalk at the lower level on France. Be cognizant of what materials are used — pavers can cause tripping for walkers and vibrations for those in scooters. _ • Consider having staff parking near the corner of France /Hazelton. Those parking spaces probably won't be in high demand. • Ensure that the cross walks are clearly delineated; especially the walkway between Byerly's and the retail building. Add sidewalks? • Has reconfiguration of the buildings ever been considered; especially the second building. • Acknowledge that balance needs to be taken with the rear elevations of the buildings. Want them done correctly — they face either the Promenade or street. Mr. Anderson said that the residential component has separate parking acknowledging the site has no rear. • The separation of retail parking from residential parking makes sense; however there's room for tweaking — • How will the parcel pickup flow — will this work - • Connectivity. • The location of the loading dock works; however, it needs better screening from the Promenade. • Maybe there isn't a sidewalk at the lower level — part of the larger system • How are we getting people from France into the development. • The utility easement running through the site is the real deal and does drive building placement. • Two housing projects share one field of parking — that's a great strength. Page 9 of 11 kab The discussion ensued with Commissioners reiterating their concern with pedestrian access and travel throughout the site. Commissioners stressed the importance of sidewalks and wondered if France Avenue would ever be pedestrian friendly. Commissioners indicated they don't want to give up on that goal. Commissioners also acknowledged that grocery stores are different and accepted that the parking would be in front of the proposed buildings vs. their goal of having buildings address the street. Continuing, Commissioners again stressed the importance of the Promenade. The Commission also suggested embracing the Promenade, adding it's a great amenity; not only for the housing aspect of the project but for the store as well. More screening could be added around the loading dock. Vice -Chair Staunton directed the discussion to the design features of the proposed project. Commissioners expressed the following: • Support expressed for building height • From an architecture perspective make it look great; understand its sketch plan review but when /if the team comes back with an application go all out on this project. • Be creative, be innovative. • Think outside the box. Vice -Chair Staunton thanked everyone for their participation in the sketch plan review process and he told the design team he looks forward to preliminary plans. • VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Vice -Chair Staunton acknowledged receipt of the Council Connection. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Vice -Chair Staunton reported that the Grandview process continues. He told the Commission the comment period has been extended to March 28th. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review the Framework on April 11, followed by the City Council on April 17tH Commissioner Forrest reported that she attended an Integrating Arts workshop. Forrest said she discovered that more could be done to promote Edina's artists. X. STAFF COMMENTS None. Page 10 of 11 Arai XI. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Potts moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 PM. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. ,-Tack-i&f(qoqeywGkke,r Respectfully submitted Page 11 of 11 Vll. COM UNITY COMMENT Loretta Knab, 51Q,8 Richmond Drive, requested guidance on how to ino a the cost of optional sewer and water service reco truction as part of the special assessment. Houle stated he would provide that information to Ms. Kn . Joe Jellen, 5221 Minnehaha ard, expressed co rn about safety at the Southdale Center during evening hours. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIO VIII.A. SPORTS DOME FEASIBILITY STUD UTHORIZED Park Director Keprios presented th recom ndation of the Park Board to authorize consultants to conduct Phase 2 of the Edina Sp s Dome Feasi 'lity Study. The Council had previously directed staff to ask the consultant to addres he feasibility of th ite immediately south of the South Metro Training Facility. The consultant Id also address the feasib 'ty of the golf dome area and had agreed to a time and materials contra ,rather than a flat fee, with a of -to- exceed figure of $12,000. The Council indicatZthorizing o determine feasibility of the golf dom ite for a joint project with one entrance prior to prostudy of any other sites. Member Brin made a motion, seconded by Member Spragu Phase Two, location phase, of the Edina Sp s Dome Feasibility Study. Ay . dle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland otion carried. VIII. B. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW— 7171 FRANCE AVENUE FOR LUND FOOD HOLDINGS Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Lund Food Holdings to build a new 52,000 sq. ft. Byerly's with a 96 -unit 7 -story apartment on top and a second 19,000 sq. ft. retail building with a 67 -unit apartment on top at 7171 France Avenue. This building would be constructed just to the south of the existing Byerly's store and once constructed, the existing store would be torn down. Mr. Teague reviewed areas of parking and noted the loading areas behind the buildings facing the Promenade. He also noted primary access points to the site off Hazelton Road with a secondary access off France through the Macy's site to the south. Mr. Teague indicated the request was for a PUD rezoning, noting a variance and amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be required for height and consideration given to a floor area ratio of 69 percent and parking shortage. Mr. Teague advised the Planning Commission supported the proposed mixed use and was not concerned with the building height, but made many comments on the site plan including the need to create gathering /staying places by enhancing the pedestrian environment and connections to the store and promenade. Proponent Presentation Greg Anderson, 4212 Oakdale Avenue, Anderson Builders representing Lund Food Holdings, introduced the design team and indicated the new store location was placed to allow the existing Byerly's to remain open during construction, to maintain a westerly facing door, and place the parking field between France and the main entrance to retain familiarity for patrons. Mr. Anderson indicated many details remain to be worked out including access points and location of the loading dock facing the Promenade. Paul Holmes, Pope Architect, presented the sketch plan for this multi -use project and advised of the client's requirements. He indicated the proponent tried to arrange the site so the residential use and its pedestrian and vehicular traffic were separated from the retail use, placing them to face the Promenade. Phase 1 would .construct 96 units of housing over the retail and Phase 2 would construct an additional 19,000 sq. ft. of retail and 67 units above that. The Council discussed the site plan and consensus was reached that while it supported the proposed mixed use and was willing to consider the height deviation, site plan enhancements were needed in the following areas: Page 4 A)3 Minutes /Edina City Council /April 3, 2012 • Providing at -grade pedestrian interaction and connection to France Avenue and transportation opportunities • Loading dock orientation would negatively impact pedestrian experience and aesthetics of the Promenade • Minimizing impact to the Promenade • Incorporation of Living Streets philosophy and design elements • Increased integration with France Avenue • Providing pedestrian access from France Avenue without having to navigate through the cars • Creation of protected, lighted, pedestrian walkways or greenway within parking areas from grade level to the store that incorporated lighting, landing pads, landscaping, and overstory trees • Modify grass strip on south side of the building to create connectivity to the Promenade • Incorporation of landscaping and placement so it does not blunt pedestrians access to the Promenade • Improvements along Hazelton Road such as a roundabout and /or living street features • Creation of quasi - public places to gather • Enhanced sustainability features including stormwater management elements such as buried cisterns to capture stormwater for irrigation The Council supported the proposed water feature, noting it would extend and create linkage with Centennial Lakes. Member Sprague suggested the proponent consider a land swap with Szechwan Star, providing Szechwan Star with an outlot on the corner of Hazelton and France. Mr. Anderson indicated the proponent had held discussions with the ownership of Szechwan Star; however, the property values had to be much closer to consummate such a deal. He added Byerly's had many partners within the store which would not want a competing use on the corner, and it would be daunting to meet the parking requirements for a restaurant in addition to housing and retail. Mr. Anderson stated the proponent also has had conversations with Macy's regarding a licensed access across both properties. Mr. Teague confirmed that redevelopment of this site would require the proponent to install sidewalks along France Avenue and Hazelton Drive. The Council indicated it had created the PUD zoning to facilitate enhanced creativity and good development that met the needs of the developer and City. However, while the current site plan incorporated elements to meet the goals of the developer, it does not meet the goals of the City and would create PUD with one -sided benefits and no public benefits. The Council indicated that to make it worthwhile to consider a PUD zoning and variances, the proposed site plan would need to address the issues raised and the City's goals. It was mentioned the Council preferred the orientation and integration of housing near the St. Louis Park Byerly's with the Wolfe Park area as well as the University Avenue Lund's integration with residential use above. The Council encouraged the proponent to consider the comments of the Planning Commission and Council and create an iconic project in this location. Mr. Anderson indicated he respects the Council's comments, acknowledged the development team had a lot of work to do, and would continue discussions with respect to the City's input. VIII.C. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE —CONTRACT ENG 12 -1 VALLEY ESTATE IMPROVEMENT —APPROVED Mr. Houle presented the street and utility improvements proposed for the Valley Estates neighborhood and staff's recommendation to install sidewalks adjacent to Creek Valley School, along Creek Valley Road from Gleason Road to Nordic Circle, as discussed during the feasibility phase. He indicated staff was reviewing the special assessment policy; however, this $14,000 portion of the project was proposed to be special assessed in 2013 with 50% to the School District and 50% divided among neighborhood properties, at $101 /REU. The sidewalk installation was recommended to improve pedestrian safety since there was a fair amount of traffic on the roadway and the sidewalk would tie into the Gleason Road sidewalk system. Mr. Houle explained this project was approximately $100,000 over budget, which would be paid from the Storm Water Fund, because the amount of drain tile needed to address issues with stormwater drainage had been under estimated. He confirmed installation of the additional drain tile would address the concern expressed by residents at the public hearing relating to drainage issues. It was noted the special assessment would be lower than presented at the feasibility study. Page 5 A it App4cqmf Natro,fi,)e Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment January 28, 2013 Preliminary Development Application Narrative Lund Food Holdings, in partnership with Schafer Richardson Commercial Real Estate Services, seeks to redevelop an existing 9.67 acre parcel at the southeast quadrant of France Avenue and Hazelton Road in Edina. The property is presently occupied by a Byerly's store of just over 59,000 square feet. The proposed redevelopment will create an exciting mixed -use community, including a residential village along the Promenade, a new retail destination on France Avenue, and improved connections to and through the site for those driving, as well as for pedestrians, cyclists, and those using mass transit. Overview: Current zoning is PCD -3. PUD zoning classification for this project is desired in order to provide flexibility that will enhance redevelopment outcomes and provide benefits as described in the city zoning code 850.04 subpart 4. The proposed redevelopment plan includes, in Phase 1, a replacement Byerly's store of 47,000 square feet, and two market -rate rental apartment buildings. Building A is a 6 story, 106 -unit Apartment Building, with two levels of underground parking. Building B is a six story, 77 -unit Apartment Building including 10,450 sq. ft. of retail space on the west side of the ground level, and two levels of underground parking. A second phase of redevelopment includes an additional apartment building (Building C) containing 48 dwelling units and 10,500 sq. ft. of retail area on the west side of the ground level, and two levels of underground parking. Building A contains 124,250 Square feet, Building B contains 81,375 square feet and Building C contains 50,400 square feet. (Note that underground parking area is not included in the totals above.) On- site parking provided includes 186 spaces serving the Byerly's retail,48 spaces serving building B Retail, 80 spaces serving building C Retail, 285 below -grade spaces serving Building A and B residential, 72 below - grade spaces serving Building C residential, and 33 on -grade residential visitor parking spaces. Byerly's Store Description: The Byerly's store is a single level structure with a roof height ranging from 20'6" to 30'. It's exterior architectural expression is rooted in the Prairie Style School and includes the use of natural indigenous stone, brick, architectural precast, glass, stucco and metal panel. The structural system relies on load - bearing, insulated, architectural pre -cast wall panels, finished with a combination of thin -set brick, precast masonry, and exposed, scored, colored- concrete. The store layout, and the need for "back of house" spaces, limits the ability of the design team to introduce vision glass in the exterior wall. Consequently, day - lighting will be provided through other means, and articulation of the exterior is accomplished through changes in wall plane and materials. Housing Description: Buildings A, B, and C are all 6 stories in height above grade with an average parapet elevation not in excess of 85'. All three buildings rely on below -grade parking, with building A and B having interior vehicular connections below grade and a covered pedestrian connection above. The buildings are concrete construction from the parking levels through the first floor, and wood construction (Type 3A) from floors two through six. p_5- The exterior architectural expression of Buildings A, B, and C is clean, sleek and modern. Enclosure materials include brick, architectural precast, and a pressure - equalized exterior rain - screen consisting of metal panel and high quality, pre- finished fiber - cement panels of roughly 12 sq. ft. each. Continuity between the Byerly's store and the housing buildings is achieved through the use of some similar materials (principally brick & architectural precast), and similar colors. It is the desire of both Lund Food Holdings, and Schafer Richardson that the design of the buildings reflect their differing purposes. Transit and Site Access: The redevelopment of the site has been planned with pedestrian, bicycle, and transit use in mind. The layout of the residential buildings takes advantage of their immediate proximity to the Promenade, and pedestrian way- finding through the site is established by the use of landscaped sidewalks, shared -use pathways, special paving sections at roadway intersections, and other architectural features. The Byerly's store entry canopy extends east to welcome pedestrians coming from the housing and Promenade, and the design of the store includes outdoor gathering spaces along France Avenue on grade, and on a second level. The planned France Avenue pedestrian and bicycle pathway will be immediately adjacent this outdoor seating space. An existing transit stop on France Avenue will be relocated to the north side of the new Byerly's, on Hazelton Road, for improved access and safety. Access to the site from north -bound France Avenue is provided via a right -In /right -out connection established between the subject site, and the Macy's Home Store property to the south. An agreement for this shared access is in place between the two property owners. Access to the site from south -bound France Avenue, and from the east, is via two curb cuts on Hazelton Road. The easternmost access is envisioned to be signalized, while the westernmost access will be right -In /right -out only. The easternmost access drive is indicated as spanning the property line between the subject parcel and the neighboring property to the East. An agreement between the two property owners is not yet in place. Stormwater, Landscaping and Site Lighting: Storm water management design includes establishment of infiltration areas above grade, as well as below grade storage and infiltration. Roof water from residential building A is planned to be routed to a water feature along the Promenade that would be constructed by the city. Alternatively, that roof storm water could be handled internally on site. The proposed landscape design has a variety of native tree, shrub, and plant types that provide seasonal interest and will exceed the requirements of the city codes. The landscaped areas will have an efficient irrigation system with moisture sensors to reduce the amount of water needed, and to prevent over - watering. Site Lighting will be provided in accordance with city requirements. Pole lights of 25' in height will be used to light the parking lot areas, and 14' tall decorative fixtures will light pedestrian walkways. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices will include lenses, reflectors or shades so as to limit light spill and glare on to adjacent properties. Illumination measured at the property line abutting residential zoned lots will not be greater than three foot - candles or ten foot - candles measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned non - residential. Sustainability: This mixed use project will incorporate sustainable design principles, materials, system selections, and operating protocols, and will participate in Xcel Energy's Design Assistance Program. Redevelopment of an existing site in a densely developed suburban context affords many opportunities. Specific sustainable features that will be incorporated into the residential buildings include: • Energy efficient windows, roof, and wall assemblies • Occupancy sensor controls in select building locations • High efficiency heating and cooling • High efficiency, Energy Star appliances in units • LED and fluorescent lighting fixtures throughout • Individually controlled and metered heating and cooling • Low flow plumbing fixtures to reduce water usage • Use of recycled content materials • Use of regional materials • Use of Low - Emitting Materials (VOC) including adhesives and sealants, paintings and coatings, and carpeting • At least six electric vehicle charging stations in parking areas • Stormwater system designed to optimize infiltration and support Promenade water feature • Convenient bicycle storage with a minimum of 150 bicycle parking stalls in dedicated storage areas Specific sustainable features that will be incorporated into the Byerly's store include: • An energy- efficient, high - performance, building enclosure system • Day - lighting • Occupancy sensors • High efficiency mechanical and electrical systems with high - performance controls • The use of locally and regionally sourced materials, components and equipment • Incorporation of materials high in post- consumer and post industrial recycled content • Specification of Low Emitting materials • Convenient bicycle parking • Convenient access to Mass Transit Conclusion: This is an exciting redevelopment opportunity that has been in the planning stages for more than a year. The Sketch Plan Review process completed early in 2012 was of great help to the development team, and this plan has changed significantly as a result. The outcome is an approach that adds 234 housing units along the Promenade, activates France Avenue frontage with a new retail presence, and enhances access to and through the site for those who use motorized vehicles, as well as those who choose alternative means of transportation. Additional background information regarding Lund Food Holdings and Schafer - Richardson Commercial Real Estate is available on their respective websites; www.lfhi.com and www.sr - re.com . We appreciate your consideration of the Preliminary Development Plan application, and look forward to meeting with you to discuss the project in greater detail. I'm Cary Teague From: Greg Anderson <ganderson @anderson - km.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:08 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Edina Byerly's - answers to your questions... Here are the answers to your previous questions.... sorry for the delay. These are comments back from the architect... I counted the units by hand this morning and per the city submittal and the current (both of which agree with each other) and the final unit count I get for all three buildings is 246 (109 for building 'A', 77 for building '13', and 60 for building 'C'). For the second question, our largest unit is a total of 1,470nsf (which includes a 216nsf loft area). This is unit type G2 and is a 3 bedroom with loft. Let me know if you have any additional questions... thanks Cary. Greg Anderson Chief Construction Officer ' D: 952 - 746 -1465 C: 952 -292 -1100 ganderson(cDanderson- km.com 1 4220 Park Glen Road i St. Louis Park, MN 55416 ANDERSON KM BUILDERS All 7 i OK x € ?:r? t)a ? Fw i !:ire;, Comprehensive Building & Development Services N °°... 410w A'P Aw sow w /� •I j Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN 01/28/1315226-11051 AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST �yt Schafer ANDERSON Fal KM BUILDERS Richardson - [omprehensive Buildlnq b Bevelopment Services r C� geSiQkSF. 4"x12" Thin brick 4'x12" Thin brick 1" Insulated 1" Insulated clear vision Natural stone on precast panel Single highlight course ransluscent glaring in glass In aluminum /�' ser at columns Iuminum Irame System /frame System f dntl pilasters Rooftop equipment Ito be determined) pedestrian canopy with �Ipower operated ,4 ply bull[ -up roof and sliding entry doors metal roof edge SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION r�0 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT 3` Schafer Y Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN t•28 -13 BYERLY'S STORE ELEVATIONS 1532411ps1 - Metal roof edge 1. Insulated glass in precast concrete panel, and fascia aluminum frame Scored, buff color storefront system Metal Clad Columns Standing Seam at corners roofing �. /I /metal geSiQkSF. 4"x12" Thin brick 4'x12" Thin brick 1" Insulated 1" Insulated clear vision Natural stone on precast panel Single highlight course ransluscent glaring in glass In aluminum /�' ser at columns Iuminum Irame System /frame System f dntl pilasters Rooftop equipment Ito be determined) pedestrian canopy with �Ipower operated ,4 ply bull[ -up roof and sliding entry doors metal roof edge SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION r�0 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT 3` Schafer Y Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN t•28 -13 BYERLY'S STORE ELEVATIONS 1532411ps1 - J d POPE ARCHITERS 15511 wistm I EM I5s3I Mz l l01 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT 0 Schafer Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7 -28 -13 Pln NORTH ELEVATION —— — BYERLY'S STORE ELEVATIONS 353363fOSf A3.2 01/1U13 VIEW FROM PARKING, LOOKING NORTHEAST ,PN � 10�SSTf EET LEVEL VIEW FROM FRANCE AVE Preliminary Development Plan Schafer ANDERSON • Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development MINA, MN Richardson [a., KM BUILDERS /28113 15226 -11051 —prene­ B.11 9 a 0e.eiop— 5er1— GA Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re-Development EDINA, MN 01128113 15226-11051 Schafer [-',Richardson AERIALVIEW FROM NORTHEAST 'AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST ANDERSON KM BUILDERS C,,p,,h ... W, B,Ildl,g & D,,,I,p,ent S-1ce, VIEW FROM PROMENADE, LOOKING NORTHWEST ii 1: m ■■ � 1� .Ilr��i ii ■1 - 6 1 "I - „ter Rll \II \i i ��Illit 1 ,■ C0� 'ii ii ■ �GI �I ■.. r �� III��� �� ■� ■ O` �■ ��0 ■ii o1 l00 a u i I: :I ” i17Cm!; n i= ■ ■1 ' =" I Roo11 - 1`:�GI ol� ■1 . �.T n . pi ®R 0��e ■1 _ ■1 . �.■ uCC , �■ i iii �I n • �l.ul rlinl rl i® �. �. ■ ! 14 Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN '71/28/13 15226 -11051 C fi7 VIEW FROM PARKING, LOOKING EAST STREET LEVEL VIEW FROM HAZELTON ROAD M1, ■ ■ Schafer �P�gL�ti ANDERSON R KM BUILDERS Richardson Gpmpre6enslve Building S Oevelopmen! Services W 65 sf Sign 45 sf Sign 93 sf Sign 55 sf Sign NW Corners at France Ave and Hazleton Rd SW Cafe Entry at Main Elevation Main Entry NE Corner facing Hazelton entry drive Byerly's Store Signage 0' 16' 32' Building A - North Entry Building B - North Entry Building C - South Entry Housing - Entry Signage 0' 16' 32' 12' -0° 8 sf Pylon sign Building C - West Retail Building B - West Retail Housing - Typical Retail Signage 0' 16' = Natural stone veneer T- 60 sf Development Sign a c z 0 sf Monument sign /2'-0" h x 30'-0" w in o t N � _ ii Poured Concrete Wall i _i%Tei �RuJ�cmrhcm Na'it[7Tllt C? bo UY s J- -- �^ SW corner at France Ave Main Entry drive West Entry drive from Hazelton SW corner at France Ave Main Entry drive East Entry drive from Hazelton Development Signage 0' 8' 16' �rra 4 -j Main Entry columns Store - Partner Signage Detail 0' 4' Preliminary Development Plan ■ Schafer ,PN %001 ANDERSON Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA,MN O KM BUILDERS 01/28/13 15226- 11051 Richardson cemp,.h n ve enaemq a nvie -t S-1-, Metal Coping and standing seam metal roofing ✓t 4" x 12" Thin Brick - single highlight course Precast Concrete Panels, scored, Buff color A ' Natural and manufactured 4" x 12" Brick Blend Byerly's Store Materials i I Cement fiber panels, colors B (top), A, and C (bottom) Metal Panel and coping, gunmetal gray Metal Panel, silver metallic 4" x 12" Brick Blend Precast Concrete Panels, scored, dark gray color Housing Materials Preliminary Development Plan Schafer ANDERSON Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development ■ � c 4^� it, KM BUILDERS 01/28/ n ^N Richardson 01/28/ 6-11051 compren­me mnam9 s o­ .ma: 7 1 nve�n5err�auwegraoe r -. 1. 1. t6' Scale: 1 " =8' -0" I" Insulated glass in aluminum storefront system Metal clad, gunmetal gray Vertical metal picket guardrail - at terrace, 3'-6" high te• Scale: l " =8' -0" iffill :.1 0 I im EMM ffilww", i w.. a- L11 im PO EARCHITEM metallic s color A B ERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE-DEVELOPMENT r aluminum ding entry do., NORTH ELEVATION ■ _R_ • _• r _MCI 1 nve�n5err�auwegraoe r -. 1. 1. t6' Scale: 1 " =8' -0" I" Insulated glass in aluminum storefront system Metal clad, gunmetal gray Vertical metal picket guardrail - at terrace, 3'-6" high te• Scale: l " =8' -0" iffill :.1 0 I im EMM ffilww", i w.. a- L11 im PO EARCHITEM metallic s color A B ERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE-DEVELOPMENT r aluminum ding entry do., Average FFE above grade: 4 _y" EAST ELEVA . . �\Jj& 131a Schafer OrM_chuds.- ANDERSON UILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1-28-13 BUILDING A ELEVATIONS ssxzsssosx succr A3.4 NORTH ELEVATION ■ Average FFE above grade: 4 _y" EAST ELEVA . . �\Jj& 131a Schafer OrM_chuds.- ANDERSON UILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1-28-13 BUILDING A ELEVATIONS ssxzsssosx succr A3.4 W F L Metal silva Cement fiber HVAC grill (paint to ad,a" Composite wood f tiding p =tit Composite framed Precast concrete scored, da Retail slgnaga Iby. I Stucco on Precast cc panel, scored, bul I. Insulated g aluminum star 9 4 Average FFE above grade: 2' -6' a, W Scale: l " =8' -0" IN Insulated glass in aluminumn storefront system Vertical metal picket guardrail at terrace, 3' -6" high SOUTH ELEVATION Ito be determined) Metal coping, gunmetal gray - Aluminum sunscreeen, gunmotal gray Composite wood framed ® ® glazing ■� ■om Vertical metal picket guardrail at balcony, 3'-6" high Netal clad, gunmetal gray et a I panel - sliver metallic ■ ■ ■� ■r LL��It ® 1� I �1 �1� ■9�� I ■0 ■tl ■I'�In �1 ■III�I� 1 �I j 1 �� 11�■I -'I� ! I 11 I�1 � ■■�■� � ®A ® ■� ��� � 111 is !1 ` r�ri �i i '1111 11,1 s IN i I dll r1T11�. i■� i i I I I III ii ON Fiber cement board panel, color B �� I�11 ® 4 "a12 "Thin brick on � �� �� ■ 11)�1�1 f�!11�1 ■ �■ Precast concrete panel Precast concrete panel, ® .� scored, dark gray color IN Insulated glass in aluminumn storefront system Vertical metal picket guardrail at terrace, 3' -6" high SOUTH ELEVATION o• e. 16' Sale: 1 ° =8' -0" Average FFE above grace: 2' -6.. WEST ELEVAkTION �P POPE ARCHITECTS rasa ux-uee I Mrash u11101 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT Ulm Schafer IMP Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28.13 PreR�ary olnena BUILDING B ELEVATIONS (mxyp 1521611051 9 k RH 5¢14 3.5 - !■■_ ■ �I� ■� ■L� ■k ■q ■p■ ■� ■om ■ moll! ■ ■ ■� ■r ■E■ �1 1� I �1 �1� ■9�� I ■0 ■tl ■I'�In �1 ■III�I� 1 �I j 1 �� 11�■I -'I� ! I 11 I�1 � ■■�■� � ®A ® ■� ��� � 111 is !1 ` r�ri �i i '1111 11,1 s IN i I dll r1T11�. i■� i i I I I III ii ON �� I�11 ■ ■� �� ■ 1:11. r1���11 ■ � �� � 1111111 11'f11, � �� �� ■ 11)�1�1 f�!11�1 ■ �■ r I,I Il �� .� ■ I!I I 111 ■ �r �� ■ 1■� � In �� ■ 11T�'�1 ■ in ■� ■ II■I■ - (T111� ■ �� �� ■ ■ r� • �� ®�� ®®I ��� ■ �� ■ nr I I ■� ■� �■``��Iti e a �� • I�I�Y11 L11 _ �• 01 • ramll�I��a� • �• •� _ 11� �Il!j�11 • �• f1a�j1 ■� _ \i._ _t i r:.�l ���� ■�1 r - . I - I i ���r II - r, �.,II 11� II - I � ,il �� ■�� ■_ ■ ■■ m..� ■■m�. ■■ .� _...�J! �■_� .a 1� Yre a lr•IrLYe o• e. 16' Sale: 1 ° =8' -0" Average FFE above grace: 2' -6.. WEST ELEVAkTION �P POPE ARCHITECTS rasa ux-uee I Mrash u11101 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT Ulm Schafer IMP Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28.13 PreR�ary olnena BUILDING B ELEVATIONS (mxyp 1521611051 9 k RH 5¢14 3.5 - F 1W V`1 I L C7 Average FFE above grade; , 2' b Scale: I' =B' -0" NORTH ELEVATION rp ® P11 ®B ® ® 4 ' Metal panel, sliver metalll Cement nber panel, color ® e ® P _ 1■ X11 9 C �. Precast concrete panel, gray dark gray wlor �11I ■1 B 4 - i�■iu ��' 01� 4 "x12" Thin brick on precast �� 111 � � �r ■1 ®I■� �''� : �� �� : f1�'I -- ilk A� 11�''' � ii i■�I concrete panel - 1■ Ilflll�! Stucco on precast concrete panel, Signage (hyo —", Metal coping, tl-{� B ® ® - ' ■ ■ 1■ swred,buffcolor ' Retail signage(by Owner) gunmetal gray - ., r �� nn - - - - -- !� /1� 1" Insulated glass in aluminum e 1■ ITII e 1m .■1 ■ rill 1" Insulated glass In aluminum storefront syste 1■ Il�lj ■1 ..,,, "r.,,,,..,n. ",� Average FFE above grade; , 2' b Scale: I' =B' -0" NORTH ELEVATION o• s• te• Scale: l " =8' -0° rower operaveo suoing entry soar EAST ELEVATION$�0�� )P s POPEARC urtECIS no n. vain x+x ,SUM gas IssASOawoo l rw Isssl wx -rras BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT 016 Schafer of Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28 -13 BUILDING B ELEVATIONS 15 2 3 6 110 51 px 51 A3.6 1■ X11 1� �� �. 1■ •f�111 ■ 1■ ■1 . —11 j ■ 1■ 1■ �11I ■1 - i�■iu ��' 01� iii - �� 111 � � �r ■1 ®I■� �''� : �� �� : f1�'I -- ilk A� 11�''' � ii i■�I Iu11Il �i �■�I' - 1■ Ilflll�! I■ ■■ ' �' ■ 1■ I�a'11 ■ 1■ ■1 ■ � ' ■ ■ 1■ 1 ■, 11� !� /1� IEI e 1■ ITII e 1m .■1 ■ rill 11 �1��11 e 1� 1■ Il�lj ■1 it , °_- ..1•� =-- ■ :■ mill, iCI�1: ■— �.' ■ ��u�Y��:.! ■ 1 , ����■i�� nmin I ■rte �1� nW, —�✓t 1 ��� ■1 WIN ��� 1 ��� i� �.1■ FIRMS; !::■ —'� o• s• te• Scale: l " =8' -0° rower operaveo suoing entry soar EAST ELEVATION$�0�� )P s POPEARC urtECIS no n. vain x+x ,SUM gas IssASOawoo l rw Isssl wx -rras BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT 016 Schafer of Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28 -13 BUILDING B ELEVATIONS 15 2 3 6 110 51 px 51 A3.6 r W 1 L a, 16. Scale:1 " =8' -0" Metal panel, sllver metalliv, Fiber cememm panel, color C,, HVAC grill, (paint to match adjacent color) Compaslte wood framed slid ng patio door Vertical metal picket guardrail at terrace, T-6' hlgh� Stucco on precast concrete panel, scared, buff color Retail signage (by owner) �, Metal dad, gunmetal gray 1" Insulated glass In aluminum storefront system Average FFE cab— grade: (to be determined) Metal coping, gunmetal gray Aluminum sunscreen, gunmetal gray Metal panel, sliver metallic Cement Ober panel, color C Vertical metal picket guardrail at balcony, 3' -6" high Metal clad, gunmetal gray Composite wood framed glazing Signage (by owner) Power operated sliding entry door 1" Insulated glass in aluminum storefront system SOUTH ELEVATION IT t Al 2 Ilf ■1 ■1 ■ ' i1l�i III ■ 1■ III ■ ■1 ■1 ■ Ip111 1 1� ■ l��Tll ■1 Average FFE cab— grade: (to be determined) Metal coping, gunmetal gray Aluminum sunscreen, gunmetal gray Metal panel, sliver metallic Cement Ober panel, color C Vertical metal picket guardrail at balcony, 3' -6" high Metal clad, gunmetal gray Composite wood framed glazing Signage (by owner) Power operated sliding entry door 1" Insulated glass in aluminum storefront system SOUTH ELEVATION o• e• la• Sale: 1 " =8' -D" Average FFE above grade: 1' - 0' `\ �P WEST ELEVATION POPEARCHITECTS 1x95 .. S" sicat (6sxl s -1.Ira 16511wavo] Pm.u�m BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT mho Schafer off, Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28 -13 BUILDING C ELEVATIONS 15xI611051 R. PInA3.7 a J IT 1�� 1 ■�. Ilf ■1 ■1 ■ ' i1l�i III ■ 1■ III ■ ■1 ■1 ■ Ip111 1 1� ■ l��Tll ■1 'IC �� ■ �� >I■� ■ u I ■ �■ �■� ■ So 1. 01 ■ II�E� ■� �� ■ :�� '�I ■1 ■1 ■ X91 ■ 1■ 1111 ■ ■I ■1 ■ Ift�1 ■1 1■ ■ ®� �� ■ ®u'i® ■ �� �� ■ ■[ ■ m� =1 �� ■ Il ■1 �jj�11' ■1 �i:n�l 11■ I!�_ I�Ie�I ■1 c i11 �I I e �� Ii�tr11 a �� ■1 a Iil�1 �1 �� a III ■1 00 W1. o• e• la• Sale: 1 " =8' -D" Average FFE above grade: 1' - 0' `\ �P WEST ELEVATION POPEARCHITECTS 1x95 .. S" sicat (6sxl s -1.Ira 16511wavo] Pm.u�m BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT mho Schafer off, Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28 -13 BUILDING C ELEVATIONS 15xI611051 R. PInA3.7 a J I- a. 1. Scale: l " =8' -D" .9 �t6 6 Average FF� above grace: flF U. a. tE• Scale: l " =8' -0" L 1■ I 11170101 NORTH ELEVATION panel, silver metallic It flber panel, color C grill, to match adjacent color) t concrete panel, dark gray Thin brick on t concrete panel EAST ELEVATION -1 POPEARCHIMECTS U95 __WE N. SUITE M ST. PAU . . . ....... S, (.1) .—To I —I—) ..1-1 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT 010 Schafer OP Richardson ANDERSON KM HUILDEAS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7 -28 -13 P.Uri,s' 01128/13 BUILDING C ELEVATIONS A3.8 r- Metal coping, gunmetal gray Aluminum sunscreen, gunmetal gray Composite woad framed. Composite wood framed sliging patio door Vertical metal picket guardrail at balcony, 3' -6' high Metal clad, gunmetal gray Metal panel - silver metallic Fiber cement board panel, color A 9',12' Thin brick on Precast concrete panel Precast concrete panel, scored, dark gray color I" Insulated claarvlsion glass In aluminum frame system a. a. 16. Scale: l " =8' -0" HVAC grill (paint to match adjacent material( Metal Clad, gunmetal gray h� li�l�'■II ■1 ®� ■ i� ii ■ IN 11F� �1 � ■ 1� r1. ■ 1 �i�® 1' II■I�1 ■ Ilr It ■ EIT,� ■ Ir I� ■ rl� ®1■ �� ■I ■ �1 �� ®■ 1� 1■ ■ �� ■ IK ■1 ■ �1 - FITI ii �'� �� 11 ■�■1 ■ 1■ I. ■ i11 ®I® 11• 1 ■ —I ■ IN 11 �'� • le It low t 1 ■1 IN ■1 ME \AVeroge FFE above grade: a. -a. SOUTH ELEVATION 1 ■ I■ ■ d ■ �� ■ �1 � ■ y� r ■I 1 rr11 ■ Ilrr � - I� �1 I� ■ 1■ ■ �;■�Il ■ ■1 �'� ■ ■1 �� ■ 1 1 ■I 1■ ■ ■1 - �■ h ; a, e' 16• Scale: 1 " =8' -0" r 4 Average F4 -4- above grade: �y 4' -4' s C� WEST ELEVATION PO eE AaRCHREM uas rwf NS51uwii35 1asI_11oulra,l6sll­ 1 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT ■ ® Schafer E310 Richardson 07 ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.28 -13 He&wavv' BUILDING A ELEVATIONS RH ]531611051 - 1.3 - ii �'� low t 1 ■� mil • ■� o r■ri� : �� i■ ■� �■ : n1 : ii : ■ � �1 : ��' Dili � : i� � i i■11[ ■ Iii � - r,■ir� ■I,1■ ■1� ILr ■ ■I 1■ .i� r ® ®I® ®� 1 r 1 r ■ _ I' 1II Nil a, e' 16• Scale: 1 " =8' -0" r 4 Average F4 -4- above grade: �y 4' -4' s C� WEST ELEVATION PO eE AaRCHREM uas rwf NS51uwii35 1asI_11oulra,l6sll­ 1 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT ■ ® Schafer E310 Richardson 07 ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.28 -13 He&wavv' BUILDING A ELEVATIONS RH ]531611051 - 1.3 - -SO — ..-- - --- - - ------- AVENUE _---------------- - - - - -- .................. . . ..... ........... ......... . .... ........ . ..... . . ..... a. ....... . . ......... — ------ - - -- ---- ---- ----- . . ..... - ------ ---- --7 - ----- -------- ------- 7-- 11 ILI I I 1 111 1 111 oil I 11] LLI . . . . . . . . . . . m — - -- - ---------- --- - ---------- 77, p. Ti JJ o 14— 7. F-I I I I 1-7, ----------------- --- - - -- --- gg co fi m >z q § z 'Ej cm) 0 m Nyi Tr rl z 0 3M I (n Rg i ej lip k1 4 �q 2 50 q P9 9i h 9 •T FOR CONSTRUCTION 5 7171 Y� A WE S. ANDERSON ANDERSON KM BUILDERS & %Y, KM BUILDERS 4220PARK GLEN ROAD plx PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ST. LOU , S PARK, MN M416 LS ;SO ! 50 B Y E R L Y ' S A D D I T I O N Raell ----- ------- 7. Wt 11 its/ I Wow i Enna a Z 0.. Nom I,yr9 :1aWAki i BVERLY'S 47,000 SF 950 SF MEZZ lS'a� M � M � Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue Re- Development EDINA, MN 1- 28-2013 115226-11051 HAZELTON ROAD WE KNiG sRAC s es BY(E RApt I HSG'B' ;I .I ,I RETAILI 10,510 SF i I i PYLON SIGN IBORNOOD SICK �� I w HSG'C'I RETAILI 12,210 SF I I _ __1�._._ __ LOBBY I I 1 VBO.ENADE r K HOUSING W '' m,w BF r WATER FEATURE \ BY OTTERS r r I I , ■■ Schafer ANDERSON ■® Richardson 0 KM BUILDERS Comprehensive RGimmq s oeYeiSPB,eGC serm«s � ALTAIACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY WITH TOPOGRAPHY 5a I 51 PI i i so I 1 11 L 0 TS 2 AND 3, BL OCK 7, YORKTO LB HDINA LLC 0. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA VVN I. DETAJL i 7 IoWm.— 1'! 0 Fl� I t ■PARMOCCUW® E BENCHMARK ■ SURFACES I Z 7 .�3 2) 1 1� •1— —.d — =p.: lamp 0gli M ;R IWL p hev ---- — - – ------- — —F U) H - T- All, dig ®I I 6 o III I I! I� I! Iq� A s °, kEFS! j �I IL ................ 5 ----- -- - . . ---- .. ... ----- ------- ... 4 s goaii L r i P W.q s S x > -:t ----------------------------------- ----- I; P IS fill P is FIX J�j�;Ro M041,6,11.1 Imp 1, H z P1 4115 19 z amp jq OP 01,41 14p A q 14 M p H ., I ag 19 I M , F N 2 i H i 1; 181 'XI Ell o' 'e $1 ; 1441 mill i 504 II BO - IRA H H q leg F, Op 'A NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �97 71 �M� ANDERSON ANDERSON KM BUILDERS KM BUILDERS S 4220 PARK GLEN ROAD Pj-K PRELIMINARY T. LOUIS PARK. MN 55416 -_ wrz- uea_I �� er ��S rl L�v | 771 -K Ill T. iilo Rq 91 ra Po 0 7171 FM,&UE S. I ANDERSON ANDERSON KM BUILDERS 4220 P-K GLEN ROAD .'--. ~~~~.~.~~ . ~�-~~�~-�.~~ ME=====-_ . � FRAN-CE----AVENUE ---- - -- --------- - ----- ---- - -- -- -- m - ----------- ---------- - ---- -------- - ----------- ------- - --------- - - - - -- - - -------- - - - ---------- - - - - -- ----------------- - - -------- ------------ - ----- ----- ----- --- - ------------ - ----- - ------- --- sC =-=;- -------- - - ----- - ---- ------- - 7, VY. • ",W - l J- t- t T 1 I I` 4-1 I I I _.1 1 Fj I,, ------ ...... j J 7t T- 4 . . ...... V 1 r, I I I I 1 7! A i MF Ii. 19 L3 A > ( pi, -- - ----------- - ---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - 4_ J- --o m mm 11 z GI Z Rim, 0 11 H 4 XAM9 -m' T11 MA li�' Ca, NO w z FRIA!, cp m 2 Y NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A 6 7171 FfihZ �AUE �S ANDERSON ANDERSON KM BUIMERS .I�� A 4220 PARK GLEN ROAD R-T-K KM BUILDERS S T. LOUIS PARK. MN 55418 ,,.,d1R-.WAR11 GRADING PLANI - .... - --1 - I- D i W: ! LU Q ! LW LQi i I i i I i j LANDSCAPE NOTES Au TNrrs Nor n Plunwc xm, ro NaaLC soap xANOYOm uula wets MTN � 1a. a r w ou. gPANATE A1L � ,� 1aLa, ANLA4 L,YNL awu� Alm Yu1w 10.LT s0o. 1mTm ro lumseAaL orrAx vm Tm ,ETA1At v1Ax1w, NOIEt. ,mmA110N NOTE n110 PLVlINO ORALS w vuwxc Lm mums oN vwnm¢ TO BE SOOOFD 018ES5 OTNAYCS NOTm. .WONO WT NWTUS ANO PIANRTO f®S 94LL P[COL£ OF 9NfmOm HAROP.000 YILaI OL4A INmSCAPE fAFYd0 nn ree O11NIM15E NOTLIA ALL PIIxITHG ARFAS ro % WOWIFD. 1A1m. �ismi r�i1sN"'oLVrumeu: Ac�c�ov Anr L IRRIGATION NOTES LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS lumscAVC La1TNAC1w1 swL vm,r n s1oP wuT.xc ov TNfA ,LaTaan.a mL s OREIOwm er Txc me PaTa¢Imt a T1[ 1pT oLrnrmrr t� PFOP6� ou srt - ro Trs rwc.Lrmx P1Ax ro ix[ wmsrwPL ANmaTCCr PoN �L1�D eT a olwAUauL TNRS PrtD705FN a srt - xn T Paa¢TrN - xT.e 1F/ w -can taNNUC1m wuL PNOLU PLC srx�s UATN vwmxr "JL.Ias PNOVO5F0 w s1¢ . mT Axo ONILL Aac 1w wracnlml Alm aeecac POYhIL x Aownw+ ro TIE 1¢au,aD xuuaN of oLVrslmr T s :L v1u vwuuanLS PxoPOssnn a src . 1aw munn a uxm+slwn 1Nas Alm vw� suu ac vNOVmm m 11R 6 W,G1NH IS ANFw 6 ,OAOL9RIf FON 111E NE1T LuPILtE A A g1AL11T lumSUPE TIO:n1YFNT. �OR£WPUp1� �Tn50FN0TtD M PLVI. VEN61' WYIS 'MIH Y.wY 6 NccuP+m OLLRSiONT TINES FON emmm Xpa(1 OISwTLA Twv+ xr ns % raLOes nmcATwN omcx AN, corslmxnox s ro ec PNOLmTn er CONTM010N Nt NNF Alm PIANiWO APE.tS CECmOp15 COXRENg15 roTAL 4 - OWlA1R1TAt Y CAL HT. 011 LF55 ONE 4 ro Nf OL9a1al AHO CWSTMICim PFA m11PNNHTARY 2N' CAL S' M. x5F 1e N[maiAL ONS ANp LOC.L NFLUI.LT0.5 A061rt 9 NT. iIm1ANT LS' GL 10 H. x0>: 4L 14 CAL 1Y HT. xOT. 14 C- w Nw1. " ' momma GOPHER STATE ONE CALL hm au.. M, 051 -IS—u YN. TW Frx 1- 800 -x9x -1180 PLANT SCHEDULE 1 l Z ql, o 4ll�l 7 Z O U It O IL B . B i IM d. E { 11iM !!viii! N � uT Oaf J O � mZ� �(�Oy Y Y ¢ a 01 N — wn° "L N 0 W 0 O Y � m c ZIM Q Y iw �°dcc az 5 _ — - 1.sw — - airre �.-r^..r�i^-rir '�4 ^�n� �I•.ri -- W —All- 5- �a �m_�i= ��Gmr, er�rzaa mni.T^c "iir.-� L�I�.+°_��.1'+icti• *a -�I _srvTa..Y:AJ 1 l Z ql, o 4ll�l 7 Z O U It O IL B . B i IM d. E { 11iM !!viii! N � uT Oaf J O � mZ� �(�Oy Y Y ¢ a 01 N — wn° "L N 0 W 0 O Y � m c ZIM Q Y iw �°dcc az 5 •� ilix Am 7f A44 i 1 I t - I 4D 46 CG 46 9D GB CG CB 9D CB CG 46 9D CB CG CB 9D 46 CD CB 96 CB 4G CB 9D 46 4G CB 9D CB 4G 46 9D 46 4G C6 96 CB CD 46 9D is v�►° ����lJ�u�J�i�`�1���?.1����7f�o �►��•��i"''- '�'�i.' Uhf �,�I_c_�S� : 1ia�o�• 1�tGit ►aasoi•L °ACiU�asa�i•tii!�i1�ia oi? LuyS�i�-=. 6. �rl31 » tia: �l�•_ �Sd2iNia .�_<S%�1�i•.��_c.�%�_�'a_� ��ff� 4D 4B 4B Mad 46 dp 4D 4D 46' 4G 4B CB Q9 4B M FEW �4C 4B 4C ��1► �< p�r�l�%<► �,. �q�iil� ►wiPf,��3i� %�ioS *► ±�s�.� • �� � • •�"'iTT11 1 �we��-a mq� >�rb a.n • �tK `� • • e�l►,'ks.e•• n•A$rn • ilii� ���,�'� m�y�ia,• e �.II� �ii�i =� =•G� � �iT��� �em��i�= iGGiiG���iGi�iiG�i��i,l�1 46 9D 46 4D CB 96 CB CD 46 9D 4B GO GO GO 4B 4D 40 4D 00 90 CB SO 4B 40 4B El CB 4G 46 4D 46 4G 46 I yl . 12 7171 P uE S. ANDERSON ANDERSON KM BUILDERS was_— ,,,,,,,,,,r„ miiissu T 4220 PARK GLEN ROAD — — -- i•2T.K LANDSCAPE DETAILS KM BUILDERS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416— ' "-- - - -' - -- ® — •^�'�°'q ina/+a J ITV gal FRANCE AVENUE ----------- ------- ---- --------------- a5m97(N.5) We t F . ...... ...... ... ...... ...... ...... ...... ....... ..... 4-- . ...... ...... ..... ...... . ...... ...... . .......... II, I ...... . .... pap ............ ... ------ - ---- ............. ...... - ------ ... III "d 2. - ---- -T ----- - CZZ=, 120.1 "4. 3.8' 6,1 4— IF yl - x• 2jI 1 - -------- ev Ili .l, .._ �<;- � I I I �s7fl :j�:�:i:.�_ _ : -- N I =11I i )'!'13 \�'1 -FL ?I S' F . . ....... ni gig —J, 104. -T -X 9 43.8 Al, p. r % . cj- Alm 00 ;4 7Z., Al 9 zz� 7 -------------- 4 rn IM 5 q. 'HIP, t X11MIAE OM M! c 14 2 (D a T FOR CONSTRUCTION y 7171 F&W ..&UE S. ANDERSON ANDERSON KIM BUILDERS M BUILDERS S 4220 PARK GLEN ROAD PLK CSI T. — wl- Rfa4INARY LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 IR PLAN Q� i 0 z MEE �INE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN nz-� 3132' � �',�, BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■l■ Schafer Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28-13 FIRST LEVEL AND MEZZANINE FLOOR PLANS A2 -1 I I I I I I I - I BREAK ' j ROOM I• <s.• I % NG RECER + I I ' I STORAGE/FREEZERSi I I I I I I i ------- -- --- -7-- -- -- -- -- -- --= T-- - -- --- r -- - i---------- r---------- ---1 --------- � I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I s I I I I I I i BAkERY I -- -- ------- -- r--------------- T----------------r------ --------- I- ------- ---- -1- -- ---- -- j STORAGE/ j COOLERS I I I I I I I I- I I I I I S ,I DELI GROCERY I I I I - -- -- - - - - - -- ----------=---- I- --------------- 1---------------- I- ------------- 7---------- - -- u I PHARMACYI I PRODUCE PREP KI#CHEN I I I I I 4 I I I CREATIONS I I I CAFE -- --------------+--------------- t -- -- -------- -- -i-- ---- .- -- -- - -- -- — _- _ -_ -__� -------- -- I -- ------- - - --,I I I II II I II I I II II 'Y r it I I CHECKOUTS FLORAL ' 6 Q r r it I I u �I I ENTRY/EXIT II COF!,FEE I li II _ I _ -_ _- _ - - -___ 4-- _--- _- ,_- _- _- - —, _ _- ___Ir-- _- _ - - - - -_ _ -_ I_ rf____— _ _- ___� =__ BANK ji I , I _ II ENTRANCE/EXIT I U PARCEL PICK -UP � I - i-- -- - - -- ------ --------------------------- I II I I I 11 I L ■ ■ - - ■- I ■ - ■ ■ ■ ■ •- ti- - - - - -� - - - - - -� --------y-------- cl - - -_® FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN nz-� 3132' � �',�, BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■l■ Schafer Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28-13 FIRST LEVEL AND MEZZANINE FLOOR PLANS A2 -1 NG LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN Mt . BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■ Schafer ® Richardson ANDERSON - KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28 -13 BUILDINGS A & B PARKING LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN sxr�r Hl n PARKING LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 31 = 1'-0' BYERLYS FRANCE AVENUE "RE -DEVELOPMENT I ■ Schafer ® RicYlazdson �ANDERSON KM "BCHI LDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28.13 BUILDINGS AB B PARIONG LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN Mech 7 Bikes 21 18 13 13 4 i 6 6 14 . Elec T Ele 15 82 Cars 64 Cars 15 Bikes 10 16 Down torag ,� n PARKING LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 31 = 1'-0' BYERLYS FRANCE AVENUE "RE -DEVELOPMENT I ■ Schafer ® RicYlazdson �ANDERSON KM "BCHI LDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28.13 BUILDINGS AB B PARIONG LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 332' = 1'-0' FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■ ■ Schafer ® Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY• DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.28.13 BUILDINGS A & B MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN mnl M� T� Q, UPPER LEVELS TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN su= 4r FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT E Schafer Richardson �ANDERSON • KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY• DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28-13 BUILDINGS A& B UPPER LEVELS TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN REM w. �P H4 Mach 38 Cars I MEN MEN mmim- bikes Mech T Storage Down to L 36 Cars Up to out 11 X 18 7 bikes n Bldg C Parking Level 2 n Bldg C Parking Level 1 3l3T t' -0' 3/32' = 1'-0° 01 BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■ ■ Schafer Richardson �ANDERSON KM BUILDERS � r PREUMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.28-13 BUILDING C PARKING LEVELS 1 S2 1 H� HS : Bld . C Level 2 Bldg C Level 1 ° Z' - 16 re snz = r a FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT mi Schafer ®Pt Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28-13 BUILDING C LEVELS 18 2 H6 FT DN Y Retail 10880 SF Utility Elec Fitness Mail Lobby Coffee ® 0 I : Bld . C Level 2 Bldg C Level 1 ° Z' - 16 re snz = r a FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT mi Schafer ®Pt Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 -28-13 BUILDING C LEVELS 18 2 H6 ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 7171 FRANCE AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD) Subd. 4. Planned Unit Development District -4 (PUD -4) — 7171 ;France Avenue (Byerly's) A. Legal Description-. ; Lot 2, Block 7,- Yorktown Addition, Hennepin County., B. Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the. re- development plans received by the City on „ 2013, except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2013- , on file in the Office of the Planning Department under file number 2013- 004.13a. C. Principal Uses: All principal and conditional uses allowed in the Planned, Commercial District -3 (PCD -3) D. Accessory Uses; Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX All accessory uses allowed in the Planned Commercial District -3 (PCD -3) Signs allowed per the Planned Commercial District. 4�1 E. Conditional Uses: iNone F. Development Standards. Development standards per the IPCD -3 Zoning District, except the following: !Building Setbacks IFront — France Avenue 50 feet IFront — Hazelton Road 25 feet Side — East 25 feet. (Rear — South 40 feet !Building Height eight stories or 108 feet ,Maximum Floor Area Ratio 72% Parking Stalls (Residential) 350 enclosed & 33 surface iParking Stalls (Retail) 314 stalls Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX C James B. Hovland, Mayor Ab 0) CITY OF MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 g1r1A,l Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com tA O Date: February 22, 2013 H�J• �y To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Byerly's — France Avenue Re- Development Dated January 28, 2013 Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plan and offer the following comments: O A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. O A developer's agreement will be required for the placement of the public water main and sanitary sewer and for any other public improvements. O Cost participation for the France Avenue improvements, which include the right -in /right -out and also the Hazelton Road improvements will be proposed / determined prior to the final city Council approval. O Comments on the, traffic study will be submitted prior to the February 27`h Planning Commission Meeting. Civil Sheet 5• • Additional stop signs will be required internally. • The City code for maximum width of an entrance is 30 -feet. Therefore, a concrete median will be required for the westerly right -in /right -out at Hazelton Road. Civil Sheet 9• • Provide a plan that shows the roof water from the residential buildings to drain easterly towards the Promenade. • Note on plan which water mains and sanitary sewer is "Private" versus "Public ". Redlined drawing to be emailed to engineer. • Provide descriptions of easements for the "Public" infrastructure. • Provide all documentation that was required by Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit, including the maintenance agreement for the Underground Chamber Storage System. Civil Sheet 10: • Update all City of Edina details. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. G:\PW\ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS\F Streets \7171 France Avenue (Byerlys)\Staff Review\20130222 WH -Edina Review 717 France.doc hi Engineering Department - 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment in Edina, MN January 16, 2013 RLK Project No. 2012 -135 -M 0 �( 0 oxtrao rd i nary cgmmum"�'�'Oz .- � - -INCOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS , Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment Edina, MN January 16, 2013 Prepared For: The CITYo E I INA •�� " ^ °; "'���• ...For living, learning, raising families & doing business 0 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Prepared By: INCORPORATED RLK INCORPORATED . Minnetonka Office 6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 952- 933 -0972 RLK Project No. 2012 -135 -M RLK Incorporated Page i of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M TABLE OF CONTENTS B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND STUDY AREA ......................... ............................... 2 1. Description of Proposed Development .............................................................. ............................... 2 2. Map of Site and Street Network ......................................................................... ............................... 2 3. Intersections and Roadway Segments to be Analyzed ....................................... ............................... 2 C. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................. ............................... 3 1. Existing. Traffic Statistics .................................................................................... ..............................3 2. Existing Roadway Geometrics ........................................................................... ............................... 3 3. Operational Analysis Methodology .................................................................... ..............................5 4. Existing Trip Generation ...................... ............................... 5. Existing Queue Lengths ..................................................................................... ............................... 8 D. FUTURE PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT ..... 9 1. Changes in Road Network ................................................................................. ............................... 9 2. Background Development Traffic Growth ........................................................ .............................10 3. No -Build Trip Distribution .............................................................................. ............................... 11 4. Projected No -Build Traffic Volumes ................................................................. .............................12 5. 2015 No -Build Traffic Operations ..................................................................... .............................12 F. FUTURE PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH DEVELOPMENT .............15 1. Proposed Development Phases .......................................................................... .............................15 2. Proposed Directional Distribution ..................................................................... .............................15 3. Proposed Build Trip Generations ....................................................................... .............................18 4. Projected Traffic Operations — 2015 Build ........................................................ .........................:...19 5. Projected Traffic Operations — 2016 Build ........................................................ .............................21 6. Projected Traffic Operations — 2016 Build with Restaurant Development to the East ................... 22 G. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS .................................... ............................... 25 H. PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS ........................................................ ............................... 27 I. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................ ............................... 28 FIGURES...................................................................................................... ............................... 29 APPENDICES.............................................................................................. ............................... 39 RLK Incorporated Page ii of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 — Project Site .................................................................................................. ............................... 30 Figure2 — Existing Geometrics ................................................................................... ................a.............. 31 Figure 3 — Aerial Photo of Existing Conditions ........................................................... ............................... 32 Figure 4 — Existing Peak Hour Turning Movements ................................................... ............................... 33 Figure 5 — 2015 No -Build Peak Hour Turning Movements ........................................ ............................... 34 Figure6 — Proposed Geometrics .................................................................................. ............................... 35 Figure 7 — 2015 Build Peak Hour Turning Movements ............................................... ............................... 36 Figure 8 — 2016 Build Peak Hour Turning Movements ............................................... ............................... 37 Figure 9 — 2016 Build with Restaurant to the East Peak Hour Turning Movements ... ............................... 38 LIST OF TABLES Table1— LOS Criteria ................................................................................................... ............................... 6 Table 2 — Trip Generation Rates — Existing Byerly's Site ............................................. ............................... 7 Table 3 — Existing Levels of Service ............................................................................. ............................... 7 Table 4a — Selected 95`x' Percentile Queue Lengths — P.M. Peak Hour -- Existing Byerly's Site ................ 8 Table 4b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths - Sat. Midday Peak Hour - Existing Byerly's Site ..... 8 Table 5 -- Projected Levels of Service — 2015 No -Build Condition .............................. .:...........................13 Table 6a -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour -- 2015 No -Build Conditions...................................................................................................................... .............................14 Table 6b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Saturday Midday Peak Hour -- 2015 No -Build Conditions...................................................................................................................... .............................14 Table 7 -- 2015 Build - Trip Generation Estimates 1. — Proposed Site .......................... .............................18 Table 8 -- 2016 Build - Trip Generation Estimates 1. — Proposed Site .......................... .............................19 Table 9 -- Projected Levels of Service — 2015 Build Condition .................................... .............................20 Table 10a -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions..................................................................................................................... .............................20 Table 10b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions..................................................................................................................... .............................20 Table 11 -- Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition ................................. .............................21 Table 12a -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions.................................................................................................................... :.............................. 21 Table 12b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions.................................................................................................................... ............................... 22 Table 13 -- 016 Build with Impacts to the East - Trip Generation Estimates 1. — Proposed Site .................23 Table 14 -- Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition (With Impact of Parcel to the East) ..... 23 Table 15a -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions.................................................................................................................... ......... .I..................... 24 Table 15b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths: — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions.................................................................................................................... .............................:. 24 RLK Incorporated Page iii of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M A. REPORT LETTER January 16, 2013 Mr. Wayne Houle Public Works Director City of Edina . 4801 w. 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis — Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment Dear Mr. Houle: The attached report details the traffic impact analysis of the Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment at southeast comer of France Avenue (County Road 17) and Hazelton Road in Edina. The developer, Anderson -KM Builders, is proposing to redevelop the existing grocery store site into a mixed use development. The proposed redevelopment will encompass a new 52,500 square foot grocery store, an additional 20,950 square feet of retail and 234 units of multi - family housing. The redevelopment utilizes two full access intersections onto Hazelton Road, as well as a new right - in/right -out intersection on France Avenue. In addition, there is cross - access to be allowed between this site and the Macy's Furniture Store site to the south. RLK analyzed two peak times in its analysis — Weekday PM Peak Hour and Weekend Midday Peak. These two peak periods reflected the critical time periods among the three main land uses on the site. The report found that the Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment will result in acceptable levels of service for traffic using these intersections during the tested peak hours. The two access points along Hazelton will adequately serve the trips into and out of the site — especially when the easterly intersection is signalized. The right - in/right -out intersection on France will not adversely affect the northbound operation of France Avenue. Therefore, it is recommended that the City of Edina accept these findings in their consideration of the Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment. Sincerely, Stephen J. Manhart, P.E., PTOE, PTP Senior Traffic Engineer Attachment RLK Incorporated Page 1 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND STUDY AREA 1. Description of Proposed Development Anderson -KM Builders, LLC plans to redevelop an existing Byerly's Store at 7171 France Avenue South in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, MN. The site is to be redeveloped to replace the existing grocery story with a new 52,500 square foot grocery store and additional 20,950 square feet of retail and 234 units of multi - family housing. It is anticipated that the new grocery would be open mid- August of 2014, and the multi - family housing and additional retail would open in phases between mid- November, 2014 and late 2015. The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed redevelopment. 2. Map of Site and Street Network Figure 1 illustrates the development site and the study area street network. RLK analyzed traffic in the area bounded by France Avenue on the west, Hazelton Road on the north, York Avenue South on the east and 72 "d Street on the south. RLK also looked at the interaction of trips between the proposed Byerly's redevelopment site and the Macy's Furniture Store to the south. Figure 2 shows the overall street network to be analyzed in the study area. 3. Intersections and Roadway Segments to be Analyzed Existing intersections to be analyzed include: ➢ France Avenue (County State Aid Highway 17) and Hazelton Road ➢ France Avenue (County State Aid Highway 17) and W. 72 "d Street ➢ York Avenue (County State Aid Highway 31) and Hazelton Road ➢ Byerly's Main Access and Hazelton Road ➢ Byerly's Service Access and Hazelton Road This study will also focus on the following proposed driveway intersections: ➢ Byerly's new Truck/Secondary Access onto Hazelton Road (unsignalized) ➢ Byerly's new Main Access onto Hazelton Road (proposed as signalized) ➢ New Access onto France Avenue (proposed right - in/right -out) RLK Incorporated Page 2 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M C. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1. Existing Traffic Statistics To address the- impacts of a development on the surrounding roadway system, it is necessary to first understand the existing traffic conditions prior to the area's redevelopment. The site exists today with a Byerly's grocery store encompassing 59,359 square feet. In addition, there are 448 parking stalls serving the grocery store. PM peak hour and Saturday Midday peak hour turning movement counts were conducted during November 3 and 7, 2012. The two peak times analyzed — P.M. Peak Hour and Saturday Midday Peak Hour — correspond to the heaviest commercial traffic in the area. Figure 3 shows an aerial photograph of the existing intersections and driveways serving the Byerly's site. Figure 4 shows the average daily traffic along the routes within the study area. Figure 5 shows the peak hour turning movements at the major intersections within the study area. AM peak hour counts were previously conducted by Hennepin County at several nearby intersections along France Avenue. The AM peak hour counts were found to be 20% to 25% lower than the PM peak or Saturday peak counts. Therefore, only the PM and Saturday peak hours were analyzed with this study. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. According to recent traffic studies conducted for the City of Edina, it has been found that France Avenue traffic has decreased. In 2009, two -way traffic counts on France Avenue varied from 26,000 vehicles /day to 28,500 vehicles per day. In 2011, it was found that France Avenue daily traffic volumes have decreased to a range between 24,300 vehicles per day to 27,800 vehicles per day. 2. Existing Roadway Geometrics Vehicular access to the site from the development area is expected to occur primarily on two roadways: France Avenue and Hazelton Road. The following text details the specifics of each of these roadways: • France Avenue S. (County State Aid Highway 17) is functionally classified as an A -Minor Arterial- Reliever route. It exists as a six -lane divided roadway with separated left and right turn lanes in an urban cross section which travels primarily north/south through the City of Edina. In the area of the proposed site, France Avenue has a posted speed limit of 40 mph. Average daily traffic (ADT) just south of Gallagher Drive is 28,000 veh/day, as measured in 20112. • Hazelton Road is functionally classified as a collector. It is a four -lane undivided roadway with an urban cross section which travels east/west. Hazelton Road, also classified as Municipal State ' PowerPoint presentation from France Avenue TE S.P. 120 - 020 -037 Intersection Enhancements Stakeholders Meeting #1, May 31, 2012. 2 2011 Publication Traffic Volumes Metro Street Series — 4D, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Transportation Data and Analysis, Traffic Volume Program, http: / /www. dot. state .mn.us /traffic /data/index.html RLK Incorporated Page 3 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Aid System Route 166, has a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Hazelton has an ADT of 7,600 veh/day just east of the proposed site, as measured in 2009. • York Avenue S. (County State Aid Highway 31) is functionally classified as a Major Collector, and is a four -lane divided County roadway with and urban cross section and 35 mph speeds. ADT on York Avenue south of Hazelton is 15,000 veh/day, as measured in 2011. The following summary lists the numbers of lanes and types of traffic control at intersections, as well as posted speeds, no parking zones in the area: France Avenue at Hazelton Road - Traffic Signal control; On- Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 40 mph on France; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. • SB France Ave approaching Hazelton — one shared through/right, two through, one left; • NB France Ave approaching Hazelton — one free right, three through, one left; • EB Hazelton approaching France Ave — one shared left/through/right lane; • WB Hazelton approaching France Ave — one free right, one through, one left. Hazelton Road at westerly Bay's Site Entrance — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. • SB Development Driveway (Rue de France) approaching Hazelton Road — one shared right/through/left lane; • NB Byerly's westerly driveway approaching Hazelton Road — one right lane, one shared through/lane; • WB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one shared through/left lane; o EB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one shared through/left lane • Hazelton Road at easterly yerly's Site Entrance — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. o SB Development Driveway (Rue De France) approaching Hazelton Road — one shared right/through/left lane; o NB Byerly's westerly driveway approaching Hazelton Road -one shared right/through/left lane (widened for truck movements); o WB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one shared through/left lane; o EB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one shared through/left lane • York Avenue at Hazelton Road — Traffic Signal control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 35 mph on York; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. o SB York Ave approaching Hazelton — one right, two through, one left lane; o NB York Ave approaching Hazelton — one left, one through, one shared through/right; o EB Hazelton approaching York Ave — one left/through, one right;_ RLK Incorporated Page 4 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M o WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one shared. left/through/right lane. • France Avenue at 72nd Street — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 40 mph on France; Speed Limit 30 mph on 72 "d Street. • SB France Ave approaching 72nd St — one through/right, two through; • NB France Ave approaching 72nd St — three through lanes; o EB 72nd St approaching France Ave — one shared left/through/right lane. • France Avenue at Gallagher Drive — Traffic Signal control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 40 mph on.France; Speed Limit 30 mph on Gallagher. • EB Gallagher Drive approaching France Avenue — one through/right, one left; • WB Gallagher Drive approaching France Avenue — one through/right, one left; • SB France Avenue approaching Gallagher Drive — one shared through/right, two through, one left lane o NB France Avenue approaching Gallagher Drive — one shared through/right, two through, one left lane Sidewalks are currently provided on one side of France Avenue in this study area. A six -foot wide sidewalk exists adjacent to the curb along the west side of France Avenue between 66th Street to 76th Street. On the east side of France, there is no sidewalk between Hazelton Road and Gallagher Drive. There are six -foot sidewalks along the north and south sides of Hazelton Road from France Avenue to York Avenue. Metro Transit bus routes 6 and 587 currently serve this area. Bus stops are currently located along the both sides of France Avenue at Hazelton and at 72nd Street, as well as one located on the west side of France at Gallagher Drive. Along Hazelton, there are bus stops located on the north and south side of the street just west of the Target Store and just east of the Edina Promenade. Existing rights -of -way vary within the study area. From Hazelton Road south to 72nd Street, the half - street right -of -way narrows from 75 to 63 feet (for the right turn lane). The westerly half -street right -of- way of France Avenue in this segment is 50 feet. On Hazelton Road, the half -street right -of -way on the south half of the street is 36 feet, while the north half street right -of -way varies from 36 to 44 feet (again for the right turn lane). 3. Operational, Analysis Methodology Operational analyses were conducted at the study intersections per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), which reports a level of service based on the delay experienced by vehicles at a particular intersection. The level of service concept indicates a measure of average operating conditions at intersections during an hour. Service levels range from A through F with each level defined by a range of control delay per vehicle. Table 1 lists the level of service criteria used to determine acceptable traffic operation. Traffic operations for peak hour conditions within the study area were analyzed using the industry- standard Synchro /SimTraffic software package, which uses the data and methodology contained in the RLK Incorporated Page 5 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M HCM, published by the Transportation Research Board. The software model was calibrated using existing conditions before being used to assess future conditions. The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as traffic signals and stop - controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volumes on that facility. Various factors affect capacity, including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number and width of travel lanes, and intersection control. The current standards for evaluating capacity and operating conditions are contained in the HCM. The procedures describe operating conditions in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Facilities are given letter designations from "A," representing the best operating conditions, to "F," representing the worst. Generally, Level of Service "D" represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour. Table 1. LOS Criteria LOS Control Delay (sec/Veh) LOS Control Delay (sec/Veh) A < 10 A 0-10 B >10 -20 B >10 -15 C >20 -35 C >15 -25 D >35 -55 D >25 -35 E >55 -80 E >35 -50 F > 80 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000' The acceptable threshold for a particular movement at an intersection depends on both the priority assigned to that movement and its traffic volume. In general, the higher the priority and the higher the traffic volume, the more stringent the acceptable threshold will be. For example, the acceptable threshold for a high - priority/high- volume suburban movement might be "D," while LOS "F" on a low- priority/low- volume urban movement might be appropriate. For side - street stop - controlled intersections, a key measure of operational effectiveness is the side -street LOS. Long delays and poor LOS can sometimes result on the side street, even if the overall intersection is functioning well, making it a valuable design criterion. Again, depending on priority and traffic volume, acceptable side -street LOS can range from "D" to "F." A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, or the lineup of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable level of service, but if queues from the intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. The 95`h percentile queue, or the length of queue with a 5% chance of occurring during the peak hour, is considered the standard for design purposes. For the purposes of this analysis, however, LOS "D" or "E" or better is considered acceptable for low - volume movements at certain intersections. For this analysis, the industry - standard Synchro and SimTraffic software packages were used to analyze intersection operation. All operational and queue reports are found in the Appendices of this report. 'Highway Cal2acity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.0 RLK Incorporated Page 6 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 4. Existing Trip Generation Based on the trip generation rates found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual, 9`s Edition, this supermarket will generate just over 6,000 vehicular trips each weekday and more than 10,500 trips on a Saturday (See Table 2). Table 2. Trip Generation Estimates" — Existing Byerly's Site Land Use Size Weekday PM Daily Saturday Midda Saturday Daily Enter Exit Enter I Exit Supermarket 59,359 s . ft. 258 239 6,069 322 310 10,542 Total Existing Trips 258 239 6,069 322 310 10,542 497 632 30 1. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation, 9' Edition, published by ITE. Table 3, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the. current lane geometry, traffic control and traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operating at an overall LOS D or better during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours with most movements operating at LOS E or better. The northbound left turn from the westerly Byerly's intersection has significant delay in the Saturday midday period, while the eastbound lgft turn from the unsignahzed intersection of 72nd to northbound France Avenue shows significant delay during both study periods (despite minimal volumes). Full reports showing detailed LOS and delays by approach are included in the Appendix. Table 3 - Existing Level of Service Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay (sec /veh) LOS Int. Delay (Sec /veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. B (D) 18 C (D) 22 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (e) 7 a (f) 22 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive a (c) 1 a (c) 1 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (D) 24 C (D) 30 France Ave. & 72d a (f) 2 a (f) 1 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (C) 20 B (D) 16 NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LOS at signalized intersections; Lower case letter reflect LOS at unsignalized intersection. b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LOS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. RLK Incorporated Page 7 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 5. Existing Queue Lengths RLK conducted a study of the existing traffic conditions for P.M. Peak Hour and Saturday Midday traffic conditions. A queuing analysis was conducted for the main intersections /driveways for the P.M. Peak Hour. Traffic engineers use a measure called 95`'' percentile queue. The measurement defines the queue length (in feet) that has only a 5- percent probability of being exceeded during the analysis time period. If the 95`h percentile queue length approaches or exceeds the segment length, mediation may be required. Results are shown in Tables 4a and 4b: Table 4a. Selected 951h Percentile Queue Lengths' — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — Existing Byerly's Site Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 162 Northbound Through France at Hazelton 402 420 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Drivewa 256 43 Northbound Byerly's Driveway at Hazelton 500 110 Table 4b. Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — Existing Byerly's Site Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 196 Northbound Through France at Hazelton 402 302 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Drivewa 256 74 Northbound Byerly's Driveway at Hazelton 500 154 Westbound Hazelton approach has available capacity. Northbound France Avenue has a queue length that at times extends back through the 72nd Street intersection during the p.m. peak hour. Other critical movements have available capacity at intersections. RLK Incorporated Page 8 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M D. FUTURE PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT In the testing of the. future projected traffic conditions without the development (i.e., the "No- Build" condition), an annual growth rate of 1% was assumed for background traffic. Under this scenario, it is assumed that the Byerly's site remains as -is. Therefore, traffic volumes are projected to be constant for traffic entering and exiting the Byerly's site. ' The Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment project has a completion date for the final phase in 2014. Therefore, the typical date for traffic analysis is one year after completion, so as to assess the traffic once the pattern for drivers has sufficiently developed in the area. To accurately assess traffic conditions with or without the development, traffic conditions will be assessed for the year 2015 without the development, but with the normal background growth on the street system. 1. Changes in Road Network The City of Edina was successful in securing Federal Transportation Enhancement funding for the construction of Pedestrian / Intersection Enhancements along France Avenue (CSAH 17) at 76`s Street, 70`'' Street and 66`" Street. While not finalized, the recommended improvements include: • Reducing the vehicle lanes to the minimum State Aid requirements on northbound France Avenue the entire length from 76th Street to 66th Street and on southbound France Avenue and the side streets only through the intersections at 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Removing and relocation of the France Avenue northbound outside curb from 76th Street to 66th Street and southbound outside curb at the intersections of 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Removing free right turn islands in all quadrants at 76th Street, in the southeast quadrant at 70th Street, in the southeast quadrant at 69th Street, in the southeast quadrant of the Southdale entrance, in the northeast quadrant of the Southdale exit an in the southeast, southwest and northeast quadrants at 66th Street. • Widening the center median on France Avenue and the side streets to a 10 foot width only at the intersections of 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Providing an 8 foot landscaped boulevard on the eastside of France Avenue from 76th Street to 66th Street. • Providing an 8 foot sidewalk on the eastside of France Avenue from 76th Street to 66th Street and on the west side of France Avenue only at the intersections of 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. RLK Incorporated Page 9 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M • Providing a minimum 6 foot landscaped boulevard on the side streets at 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Providing a 6 foot sidewalk on the side streets where sidewalks currently exist at 66`h Street, 70`h Street and 76`h Street. • Either a.5 foot on- street bike lane or a shared lane with "Sharrow" eastbound and westbound on 66`" Street, 70`h Street and 76`h Street through France Avenue. • ADA compliant pedestrian ramps at all intersections and driveways on the eastside of France Avenue from 76`h Street to 66`h Street and on the west side of France Avenue at 66"' Street, 70`h Street and 76'h Street. • Revised traffic signal systems at 66'h Street, 70'h Street and 76`h Street including APS pedestrian push buttons, countdown pedestrian signal timers, median refuge island pedestrian push buttons and new vehicle and bicycle detection systems. • Urban design feature including, landscaping, monuments, planter boxes, bollards and colored or stamped concrete at the intersection of 66"' Street, 70`h Street and 76`h Street. Where applicable, these enhancements have been incorporated into the proposed future -year conditions and models for France Avenue ( -- both No -Build and Build scenarios). 2. Background Development Traffic Growth Despite recent decreases in traffic volumes, future traffic growth must be assumed. This background growth must be included in future year traffic forecasts. In order to account for some background growth in traffic, a traffic growth projection factor of 1.0 was used to project traffic to the 2015 and 2016 study years. In addition to the regional background traffic, other specific none development related traffic was determined and included with the overall background traffic. Southdale Residential Apartment Development - Based on information received from WSB & Associates, Inc., a 232 -unit 10 -story apartment development is proposed for the southeast corner of the Southdale Center property. The apartment building would be constructed in the northwest corner of the intersection of York Street and 69`h Street. The analysis assumes that all units will be occupied by 2015 and that the background trip generation will be included in the background of the 2015 and 2016 analysis. Future Southdale Restaurant Development — The analysis of the Southdale Residential Development included the analysis of a future restaurant that is proposed in northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 69th Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 s.f. in size with approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will be developed by 2014 and that the background trip generation for the restaurant will be the same for the 2015 and 2016 analysis scenarios. RLK Incorporated Page 10 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Centennial Lakes Coffee Shon -- Based on information received from WSB & Associates, Inc., a free - standing 1,750 square foot coffee shop building is proposed in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of France Avenue and Plaza Drive. The site has other potential uses (fast food restaurant, bank, pharmacy, specialty retail, etc.),-but the primary analysis of the site assumed a coffee shop. The analysis assumes that all units will be occupied by 2015 and that the background trip generation will be included in the background of the 2015 and 2016 analysis. • Proposed Restaurant/Retail Site — A proposed restaurant or retail site is being proposed for the site of the former Szechuan Star restaurant to the east side of the Byerly's redevelopment property site. This site will be added to the long -term background traffic impacts. In each case, RLK looked at the traffic studies prepared for each development and compared the added trips to the background traffic for each study scenario. In the short-term build alternates of the Southdale Residential Project, the 2014 Build Alternate 1 traffic on northbound France Avenue was 53 fewer trips in the P.M. Peak Hour than in the 2014 No -Build scenario for the project. The 2014 Build Alternate generated 20 more trips on northbound York Avenue for the Saturday Midday peak hour than in the 2014 No -build scenario for the project. In the Centennial Lakes Plaza Coffee Shop Traffic Study, 21 trips were added to northbound and southbound lanes of France Avenue north of Plaza Drive in the P.M. Peak Hours Similarly, 32 trips were added to northbound France Avenue in the Saturday Midday Peak Hour, and 30 trip were added to the southbound approach on France Avenue at Plaza Drive. In each development case, the associated trips were added (or subtracted, as the case may be) to either France Avenue or York Avenue through movements in the Byerly's redevelopment analysis to represent these changes to the background developments. 3. No -Build Trip Distribution If the No -Build scenario were to occur, all site traffic will continue, to enter from and exit onto Hazelton Road at the two access driveways. The westerly driveway will continue to be the primary driveway serving the site, while the easterly driveway will continue as the delivery driveway. It is assumed that the existing trip distribution pattern will remain. Site - generated trips will be unchanged from the existing trip distribution patterns. 4 Southdale Residential Traffic and Parking Study, prepared for the City of Edina by WSB & Associates, 09/04/12. 5 Centennial Lakes Coffee Shop Traffic Study, prepared for the City of Edina by WSB & Associates, 06/18/12. RLK Incorporated Page 11 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 4. Projected No -Build Traffic Volumes To accurately project No -Build traffic volumes in the study area, it is assumed the existing Byerly's traffic volumes will not change while the background traffic will increase by the annual growth rate. To model this scenario, the trip generation for the existing grocery store was calculated and stripped from the existing traffic pattern based on percentages at each intersection. The remaining traffic is considered the Background Traffic. The Background Traffic volumes were then increased by the overall growth rate (1% annually) and the additional development background trips (described above) were added. Finally, the existing grocery trips were added back.in to reflect the No -Build scenario. Figure 5 shows the 2015 No -Build turning movement volumes for the PM Peak Hour and for the Saturday Midday Peak Hour. 5. 2015 No -Build Traffic Operations Traffic operations were tested for the 2015 No -Build Scenario assuming the roadway enhancements along France Avenue have been implemented. In addition, the following geometric improvements are assumed along Hazelton: France Avenue at Hazelton Road - Traffic Signal control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 40 mph on France; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. • SB France Ave approaching Hazelton — one shared through/right, two through, one left; • NB France Ave approaching Hazelton — one free right, three through, one left; • EB Hazelton approaching France Ave — one shared left/through/right lane; • WB Hazelton approaching France Ave — one free right, one through, one left. • Hazelton Road at westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — Side Street Stop Sign control; On- Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. (Note: Modification to 3/a access not assumed under No -Build scenario.) • SB Development Driveway (Rue de France) approaching Hazelton Road — one shared right /through/left lane; • NB Byerly's westerly driveway approaching Hazelton Road — one right lane, one shared through/lane; I o WB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one left lane; o EB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one left lane serving as the west end of the Two -Way Left Turn Lane (TWLTL). • Hazelton Road at easterly Bay's Site Entrance — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. o SB Development Driveway (Rue De France) approaching Hazelton Road — one shared right/through/left lane; RLK Incorporated Page 12 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M • NB Byerly's westerly driveway approaching Hazelton Road —one shared right/through/left lane (widened for truck movements); • WB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, left turn opportunity in the TWLTL; • EB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, left turn opportunity in the TWLTL York Avenue at Hazelton Road — Traffic Signal control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 35 mph on York; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. • SB York Ave approaching Hazelton - one right, two through, one left lane; • NB York Ave approaching Hazelton — one left, one through, one shared through/right; • EB Hazelton approaching York Ave — (Note: TWLTL assumed to end prior to York Avenue) one left/through, one right; • WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one shared left/through/right lane. The levels of service for the study intersections are shown on Table 5. Table 5. Projected Levels of Service — 2015 No -Build Condition (Assumes France Avenue Enhancements) Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay sec/veh LOS Int. Delay (Sec/veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. B (F -SBLt) 17.7 C (F -SBLt) 33.3 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (d) 5.4 b (f- NBLt)) 53.9 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. a (c) 1.0 a (c) 1.7 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (F -NBLt) 31.6 C (F -NBLt) 31.4 France Ave. & 72° St. a (f -EB) 2.0 a (f) 1.5 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (F -SBLt) 19.4 B (F -SBLt) 18.6 NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LOS at signalized intersections; Lower case letter reflect LOS at unsignalized intersection. b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LOS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. The associated 95`t' percentile queue lengths for the 2015 No -Build condition are listed on Tables 6a'and 6b. RLK Incorporated Page 13 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Table 6a. Selected 95'h Percentile Queue Lengths' — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 No -Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95`h Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 139 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 419 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 99 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 125 Eastbound Left Hazelton at B erl 's Driveway 259 41 Northbound B erl 's Driveway at Hazelton 270 78 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 181 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 79 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 171 Table 6b. Selected 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2015 No -Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 951h Percentile Queue Length ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 201 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 394 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 119 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 114 Eastbound Left Hazelton at B erl 's Driveway 259 46 Northbound Byerl 's Driveway at Hazelton 270 156 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 185 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 105 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 268 RLK Incorporated Page 14 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M F. FUTURE PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH DEVELOPMENT 1. Proposed Development Phases There are several phases proposed for the Byerly's Redevelopment Project: A. Construction of a new 52,500 square -foot grocery store — completed by mid- August 2014; B. Construction of a new 109 -unit mid -rise apartment building — completed by mid- November 2014; C. Construction of a new 77 -unit mid -rise apartment building with 10,450' square feet of retail space on the ground floor — completed by mid- to late -2015. D. Construction of .a new 48 -unit mid -rise apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on the ground floor — completed by mid- to late -2015. The staging of these phases is such as to allow the existing grocery store to remain open until the new store is completed, then the old store will close and the remaining apartment and retail will be constructed. Therefore, two Build scenarios are to be tested: 0 2015 Build — incorporating the new grocery store and the 109 -unit mid -rise apartment building; 0 2016 Build — incorporating the 2015 Build land uses with the two remaining mid -rise apartments and ground floor retail. 2. Proposed Directional Distribution Because of the proposed site layout, access to the various buildings will be possible from more than one driveway. In addition, some of these driveways will be full access while others will have limited access. Generally, trips to and from most access points were distributed 80/20 with the closer access getting the majority of the entering /exiting traffic. Exiting traffic intending to head northbound on France from the grocery or from the apartments was split 50/50 between the new RI/R0 access onto France and the Hazelton signal. Some traffic headed southbound is split between the Hazelton easterly intersection or down to Gallagher intersection. The following diagrams illustrate the directional distribution of ingress and egress traffic into and out of each land use of the redevelopment project: RLK Incorporated Page 15 of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M t r Grocery Store Traffic: a 3% Hazelton 27 %q] 6'17% a 25% 1%011,f25% 41113% 4 %* 8 %0 8 %v re 8%* Q25% 1 %4 12 %& 26 %A 4-412% 31%% 8 %% 11 %% 72nd 17%,D 20% 4 17 %0 11.20% France 8 %4 35 %4p France I Q,5% ,F2% 13 %b 2 %Uo %5% $2% 13 %b 2 %1 6`17% Gallagher s% & 3o-/-7 Proposed Housing A (109 Units): Directional Distribution -Proposed Grocery Store 35 %rp inbound Trip Percentage & Direction %20% Outbound Trip Percentage & Direction General Location of Trip Generator York 5% a 3% Hazelton 27 %u, 6'17% 4-25% 1 %b 6`25% y13% 4 / 2'%,4 2 %* 34 °� p 34 %* Q,25% 1 %14 3 %,p 26%.0 X12 % 31 %% 2 %% 11%% 17 %8 20 %t1 20% Directional Distribution -Proposed Housing A (109 Units) 35 %6' Inbound Trip Percentage & Direction 20% Outbound Trip Percentage & Direction -*- General Location of Trip Generator vMq RLK Incorporated Page 16 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 2 %tt 41 %dA France Q,5% ,F2% 13 %b 2 %Uo 6'17% Gallagher 5%.- 32 °6u Directional Distribution -Proposed Housing A (109 Units) 35 %6' Inbound Trip Percentage & Direction 20% Outbound Trip Percentage & Direction -*- General Location of Trip Generator vMq RLK Incorporated Page 16 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Proposed Housing B (77 Units & 10,450 sq. ft. Retail): %5% ,� 3% Hazelton 27 %tl� X17% a 25% 411 X25% y13 4 %a 2 %0 2 %a 34 %0 X25% 1 %4 3%P 26%_- g12% 31%-* 2 %% 11%a. 17 %4 ' 1 20 %LT 17 %,1 % 20% 2 %4 41 %cP France %6% ,42% 13 %b 2%v,,, g 17% Gallagher 5 %.9 1 32 %9 Eal, Directional Distribution - Proposed Housing 8 (77 Units & Retail) 35 %0 Inbound Trip Percentage & Direction %20% Outbound Trip Percentage & Direction General Location of Trip Generator Proposed Housing C (48 Unites & 10,500 sq. ft. Retail): York %5% a 3% Hazelton 27%t, ,c-,17% a 25% 1 %11 6,25% $13 4%* 12 %p 1%.* 36 %,, 36 %b Q25 % 1%11 1 % � 26 %� X12% 42 %% 1 %% 11%% 72 n St 17 %4 4 20 %4 17 %11 1%20% 12 %4 31%,P France %6% �2 % 13 %21 2 %'t> = Gallagher 5 %& 1 r32 1/6Q York Directional Distribution -Proposed Housing C (48 Units & Retail) 35 %0 Inbound Trip Percentage & Direction Q: 20% Outbound Trip Percentage & Direction General Location of Trip Generator RLK Incorporated Page 17 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 3. Proposed Build Trip Generations Tables 7 and 8 show the proposed trip generation estimates for each phase of the development — the 2015 Build (encompassing the new Byerly's store and Housing A), and the 2016 Build (which adds the trip generation of Housing B and C to the trip generation from the 2015 Build analysis). Each is based on the trip generation rates found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual, 9`h Edition. It should be noted that each scenario is adjusted to reflect shared trips and pass -by trips. According the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, "Pass -by trips are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without a route diversion." Further, "Pass -by trips are only applicable to trips that enter or exit the site, not internal trips. "6 According to Table 5.10 of the Handbook, the average pass -by trips percentage for supermarkets is 36 %, which was used in this study. The ITE Trip Generation Manual also outlines a procedure for calculating internal capture rates for trip origins within a multi -use development (aka, "Shared Trips"). The total Shared Trip assumption for this study was 20 %. Table 7. 2015 Build - Trip Generation Estimates" — Proposed Site Land Use Size Weekday PM Daily Saturday Midday Saturday Daily Enter Exit Enter Exit Supermarket 52,500 s . ft. 254 244 5,368 285 274 9,323 Apartments (Building A) 109 Units 44 24 725 28 28 697 Total - Gross 298 268 6,093 313 302 8,626 566 615 Shared Trips 56 56 1,211 85 82 2,710 112 167 Pass -By Trips 72 72 0 0 144 0 Total Proposed Trips 170 140 4,882 228 220 5,916 ' 310 448 2. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation, 9` Edition, published by ITE. 6 Trip Generation Manual, 9`h Edition, Volume 1: User's Guide and Handbook, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, 2012. RLK Incorporated Page 18 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 1 . Table 8. 2016 Build - Trip Generation Estimates" — Proposed Site 3. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation, 91h Edition, published by ITE. 4. Projected Traffic Operations — 2015 Build Table 9 summarizes the projected levels of service for the 2015 Build Condition. This reflects the traffic operation of the new Byerly's Grocery Store and the first building of apartment units (aka, "Housing A "). This analysis assumes the intersection enhancements along France Avenue. In addition, this analysis assumes that Hazelton has been reconfigured from a four -lane roadway (two lanes in each direction) to a three -lane roadway (one lane in each direction with a center Two -Way Left Turn Lane — a "TWLTL "). Further, the westerly driveway intersection along Hazelton between the Byerly's redevelopment site and Rue de France shopping center has been configured into a three - quarter access — that is, eastbound Hazelton traffic can make left turns, make right turns or proceed straight, while westbound traffic can only turn right or proceed straight. No movement can make a left turn except the eastbound movement. That means that from the Byerly's property, northbound movements can only turn right (eastbound) at Hazelton. Full access is possible from the Byerly's property easterly intersection with Hazelton. This intersection has been tested with either signalized or unsignalized operation. Both resulting levels of service are shown in the table below. Both operate acceptably. RLK Incorporated Page 19 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Weekday PM Saturday Land Use Size Daily Midday Saturday Daily Enter Exit Enter Exit Supermarket sq. 2,500 254 244 5,368 285 274 9,323 Apartments 109 44 24 725 28 .28 697 (Building A) Units Apartment 77 31 17 512 20 20 492 (Building B) Units Specialty Retail 50,4E 0 19 20 449 26 26 522 Apartment 48 19 10 319 12 12 307 (Building C) Units Specialty Retail 19 20 451 26 26 525 50,500 Total - Gross 386 335 7,824 397 386 11,866 721 783 Shared Trips 73 73 1,576 105 102 3,134 146 207 82 1 82 10 1 10 Pass -By Trips 164 20 Total Proposed Trips 231411180 6,248 282 274 8,732 556 3. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation, 91h Edition, published by ITE. 4. Projected Traffic Operations — 2015 Build Table 9 summarizes the projected levels of service for the 2015 Build Condition. This reflects the traffic operation of the new Byerly's Grocery Store and the first building of apartment units (aka, "Housing A "). This analysis assumes the intersection enhancements along France Avenue. In addition, this analysis assumes that Hazelton has been reconfigured from a four -lane roadway (two lanes in each direction) to a three -lane roadway (one lane in each direction with a center Two -Way Left Turn Lane — a "TWLTL "). Further, the westerly driveway intersection along Hazelton between the Byerly's redevelopment site and Rue de France shopping center has been configured into a three - quarter access — that is, eastbound Hazelton traffic can make left turns, make right turns or proceed straight, while westbound traffic can only turn right or proceed straight. No movement can make a left turn except the eastbound movement. That means that from the Byerly's property, northbound movements can only turn right (eastbound) at Hazelton. Full access is possible from the Byerly's property easterly intersection with Hazelton. This intersection has been tested with either signalized or unsignalized operation. Both resulting levels of service are shown in the table below. Both operate acceptably. RLK Incorporated Page 19 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Table 9. Projected Levels of Service — 2015 Build Condition Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay (sec /veh) LOS Int. Delay (Sec /veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. B (F -SBLt) 17.3 C (F -SBLt) 31.4 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (b) 2.1 b (b) 2.4 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) B (B) 11.3 B (B) 11.6 a (c) 2.1 a (c) 3.2 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (F -NBLt) 28.8 C (F -NBLt) 31.5 France Ave. & 72 nd St. a (f -EB) 1.8 a (f -EB) 2 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. C (F -SBLt) 18.0 C (F -SBLt) 20.4 France Ave. & Byerly's Driveway a (a) n/a a (a) n/a NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LOS at signalized intersections; Lower case letter reflect LOS at unsignalized intersection. - b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LOS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. Queue lengths for the 2015 Build conditions are listed on Tables 10a and 10b. Table 10a. Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths' — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 162 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 434 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 147 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 90 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Driveway 259 45 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 43 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 182 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 71 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 196 Table 10b. Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 180 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 478 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 44 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 73 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Driveway 259 55 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 37 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 186 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 90 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 318 RLK Incorporated Page 20 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 5. Projected Traffic Operations — 2016 Build Table 11 summarizes the projected levels of service for the 2016 Build Condition. This reflects the traffic operation of the 2015 Build conditions combined with the two additional apartment buildings (aka, "Housing B and C ").and ground floor retail uses. (NOTE: This level of analysis did not include the proposed restaurant use to the east of the Byerly's redevelopment site.) This analysis assumes the same intersection enhancements along France Avenue, as well as the geometric and traffic control changes along Hazelton described under 2015 Build. Full access is again possible from the Byerly's property easterly intersection with Hazelton. This intersection has been tested with either signalized or unsignalized operation. Both resulting levels of service are shown in the table below. Both continue to operate acceptably. Table 11. Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition (Without Impact of Parcel to the East) Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay (sec /veh) LOS Int. Delay (Sec /veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. C (F -SBLt) 20.9 D (F -SBLt) 36.4 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (b) 2.2 b (b) 2.5 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) B (B) 13.0 B (C) 13.3 a (c) 2.5 a (d) 3.6 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (F -NBLt) 32.4 C (F -NBLt) 33.3 France Ave. & 72 nd St. a (c) 0.5 a (d) 0.6 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (F -SBLt) 19.2 B (F -SBLt) 18.3 France Ave. & Byerly's Driveway a (a) n/a a (a) . n/a NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LOS at signalized intersections; Lowercase letter reflect LOS at unsignalized intersection. b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LOS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. Table 12a. Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths' — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 136 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 480 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 67 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 100 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Driveway 259 41 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 41 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 176 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 93 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 146 RLK Incorporated . Page 21 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Table 12b. Selected 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions . Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95`h Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 177 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 440 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 89 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 92 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Driveway 259 91 Northbound Byerly's Driveway at Hazelton 270 49 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 187 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 124 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 176 6. Projected Traffic Operations — 2016 Build with Restaurant Development to the East Table 13 illustrates the trip generation added by the restaurant development to the east of the Byerly's Redevelopment. Applying these trip estimates, Table 14 summarizes the projected levels of service for the 2016 Build Condition assuming an outside developer were to develop the former Szechuan Star into another restaurant. Traffic operation of the 2016 Build conditions have been combined with the impacts of a possible 8,000 square foot quality sit -down restaurant that may be in operation at or after the completion of the 2016 Build scenario. This analysis assumes the same intersection enhancements along France Avenue, as well as the geometric and traffic control changes along Hazelton described under 2015 Build. Full access is again possible from the Byerly's property easterly intersection with Hazelton. This intersection has been tested with either signalized or unsignalized operation. Both resulting levels of service are shown in the table below. .Both continue to operate acceptably. RLK Incorporated Page 22 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation ImpactAnalysis 2012 -135 -M Table 13. 2016 Build with Impacts to the East - Trip Generation Estimates" — Proposed Site Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation, 9th Edition, published by ITE. Table 14. Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition (With Impact of Parcel to the East) Intersection " PM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Saturday Int. Delay (sec /veh) Land Use Size France Ave & Hazelton Rd. Daily Midday Saturday Daily Enter Exit Enter Exit b (b) 2.7 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) B (B) Supermarket 52,500 254 244 5,368 285 274 9,323 C (F -NBLt) 33.0 C (F -NBLt) 34.5 France Ave. & 72 nd St. a (c) 0.5 a (d) 0.7 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (F -SBLt) 19.3 B (F -SBLt) 18.7 France Ave. & Byerly's Driveway a (a) Apartments 109 n/a (Building A) Units 44 24 725 28 28 697 Apartment 77 31 17 512 20 20 492 (Building B) Units Specialty Retail 0 19 20 449 26 26 522 50,45 Apartment 48 19 10 319 12 12 307 (Building C) Units Specialty Retail 0,500 19 20 451 26 26 525 sq. Quality Restaurant 8,000 40 20 720 51 35 755 Total - Gross 426 354 8,544 448 421 11,621 780 869 Shared Trips 77 77 1,676 119 112 3,350 154 231 93 93 10 10 Pass -By Trips 186 20 Total Proposed Trips 231 180 6,868 319 299 ' 9 271 411 618 Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation, 9th Edition, published by ITE. Table 14. Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition (With Impact of Parcel to the East) Intersection " PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay (sec /veh) LOS Int. Delay (Sec /veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. C (F -SBLt) 21.9 D (F -SBLt) 39.6 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (b) 2.2 b (b) 2.7 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) B (B) 13.0 B (C) 13.4 a (c) 2.7 a (d) 4.4 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (F -NBLt) 33.0 C (F -NBLt) 34.5 France Ave. & 72 nd St. a (c) 0.5 a (d) 0.7 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (F -SBLt) 19.3 B (F -SBLt) 18.7 France Ave. & Byerly's Driveway a (a) n/a a (a) n/a NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LOS at signalized intersections; Lowercase letter reflect LOS at unsignalized intersection. b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LOS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. RIK Incorporated Page 23 of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M r Queuing is also assessed for this condition, and is listed in Tables 15a and 15b. Table 15a. Selected 951h Percentile Queue Lengths'— Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions w /restaurant Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95`' Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 175 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 381 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 84 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 69 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Driveway 259 68 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 54 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 185 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 90 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 161 Table 15b. Selected 95'h Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions w /restaurant Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95'h Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 93 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 442 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 90 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 93 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Driveway 259 78 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 58 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 185 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 119 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 230 RLK Incorporated Page 24 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M G. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS As part of the Edina Redevelopment Project, consideration has been given whether the easterly driveway intersection at Hazelton will be warranted for signalization as a result of this project. RLK has used the following methodology to assess the likelihood of signalization at the intersection. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has prepared a document "Metro Traffic Signal Justification Report Methodology ", to assist in determining whether an intersection is justified for signalization.' The document outlines the current methodology in determining whether criteria are met for a signal to be considered justified at a particular intersection.' For a specific intersection to be considered for a traffic signal installation one of the following criteria must be met: 1. The intersection meets Warrant IA, 1B or 7 of the current MN MUTCD. 2. Current traffic volumes do not meet Warrant IA or 1B, but development in the area will occur such that the warrants will be met in a reasonable period of time and state funds are not used for construction. 4. Current traffic volumes do not meet Warrant IA or 1B, but a significant crash problem exists (an average of at least three correctable crashes per year (any 12 -month period) over the most recent 3 -year period) and traffic volumes are likely to meet warrants within a reasonable period. 5. The intersection has significant amounts of pedestrian traffic, which can be documented. A summary of the analysis of Warrants IA and 1B are as follows: Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach: • For Major Street = 2 (left turn lane is shared), Vehicles per hour on major street (total of both approaches) must be > 600 for Condition A, 900 for Condition B • For Minor Street = 2 (left lane + shared through /right lane), Vehicle per hour on higher - volume minor street approach (one direction only) must be > 200 for Condition A, 100 for Condition B For Condition A, the 2016 Build (with restaurant) Major Street approach = 679 trips per hour in PM Peak Hour; and 911 trips per hour in Saturday Midday Peak Hour. The Minor Street approach traffic = 64 trips "Metro Traffic Signal Justification Report Methodology ", as part of Minnesota Department of Transportation Engineering Services Technical Memorandum No. 07- 02 -T -01, Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), March 20, 2007. RLK Incorporated Page 25 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M c per hour (one direction only) in PM Peak Hour; = 97 trips per hour in Saturday Midday Peak Hour. Warrant IA is not met. For Condition B, the 2016 Build (with restaurant) conditions are not met for PM Peak Hour conditions, but are very close to being met for the Saturday Midday Peak Hour. The methodology also states that a combination of Conditions A and B may be used after adequate trial of other remedial measures is made. This allows for a reduction to levels that are 80% of the previous minimums for warrants to be made. Therefore: • For Major Street =.1 (left turn lane is shared), Vehicles per hour on major street (total of both approaches) must be > 480 for Condition A, 720 for Condition B C For Minor Street = 2 (left lane + shared through /right lane), Vehicle per hour on higher - volume minor street approach (one direction only) must be > 160 for Condition A, 80 for Condition B Under these 80% conditions, the Saturday Midday Peak Hour does not meet Condition A but does meet Condition B. The nearby pedestrian crossing of Hazelton at the Edina Promenade may be documented to provide additional justification to the signalization of this intersection. RLK Incorporated Page 26 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M i H. PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS The Byerly's redevelopment has proposed the following on -site parking for each parcel of development: Byerly's Store: 46,700 sq. ft. ground floor; therefore, at 5 stalls per 1000 sq. ft., = 235 stalls required; 236 stalls provided to south of store. Housing A and B: At 2.0 stalls /unit; 186 units x 2.0 stalls = 372 stalls, per code At 1.5 stalls /unit; 186 units x 1.5 stalls = 279 stalls Parking User Rate = 1 stall per bedroom (except 3 br) = 263 stalls 286 stalls provided in garage; 25 surface stalls = 311 stalls total Housing C: At 2.0 stalls /unit; 48 units x 2.0 stalls = 96 stalls, per code At 1.5 stalls /unit; 48 units x 1.5 stalls = 72 stalls Parking User Rate = 1 stall per bedroom (except 3 br) = 64 stalls 72 stalls provided in garage; 9 surface stalls = 81-stalls total Overall Parking Summary for Housing/Retail Buildings Parking at 2 stalls per unit 468 Parking at 1.5 stalls per unit 351 Parking User Rate 327 Garage Parking Provided 358 Surface Parking Provided 34 Total Provided 392 RLK Incorporated Page 27 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M e� I. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis documents in this study, RLK Incorporated has drawn the following conclusions and recommendations: • The three -lane configuration of Hazelton appears to work well in both scenarios. O The westerly Byerly's driveway operates well (LOS -A) as a right -in /right -out at Hazelton. At this point, the easterly driveway operates equally well as either a signalized or side street stop sign intersection (both LOS -A, with signal operating slightly better, especially for northbound movements). Left turn 95th percentile queues at the intersection are less than 100 feet in each approach. As a signal, the average control delay is 7.2 sec /veh. As an unsignalized intersection, the average delay is 4.1 sec /veh (due to free flow along Hazelton). Signal warrants may be met with further analysis outside the scope of this report. • The right - in/right -out onto France operates well, and does not interfere with northbound traffic or weaving traffic approaching the right turn lane at Hazelton. • The additional access points into and out of the development disperse the trips throughout the development, and thus reduce the overall traffic impacts onto the surrounding system. • There is a reduction in overall traffic on the westbound approach of Hazelton at France. This is due to the redistribution of trips resulting from the alternate access points (right - in/right -out at France; cross access to Gallagher via the Macy's Furniture Store access, etc.). Westbound 95th percentile queues on Hazelton at France Avenue extend to the east 183 feet (total length to westerly driveway is approx. 260 feet). • There are some queuing issues with the northbound left turn movement at York, the southbound left turn from France to eastbound Hazelton, and southbound France at Gallagher. These conditions seem to exist under the No -Build as well as the Build Conditions, and seem to attributable to other development in the area (especially Target and Yorktown Square impacts at the York intersection). • Off - street parking supply is met when considered at a 1.5 stall per unit or a parking user rate is considered. The mixed use development and availability of nearby transit may allow the parking supply to meet these lower rates. It is clear that the additional access points to and from the Byerly's redevelopment site greatly benefit the traffic operations despite there being more trips generated than in the current configuration. As a result, there are no queuing impacts directly associated with the redevelopment, even with the "roadway diet" from four lanes on Hazelton to three. While a signal is not explicitly warranted based on traffic volumes, a case can be made that signalizing the easterly Byerly's intersection will facilitate the pedestrian crossing at the Promenade to the east (subject to further engineering study). RLK Incorporated Page 28 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M a Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 FIGURES Project Site Existing Geometrics Aerial Photo of Existing Conditions Existing Peak Hour Turning Movements 2015 No -Build Peak Hour Turning Movements Proposed Geometrics 2015 Build Peak Hour Turning Movements 2016 Build Peak Hour Turning Movements 2016 Build with Restaurant to the East Peak Hour Turning Movements RLK Incorporated Page 29 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 2006 RLk INC. HAZELTON ROAD TIM HBO c 19p=BF r _FE-4rLo .............. ....... C! O 10.9 M5 F�.... A—. S. Ulm MN 55435 11.9 73.362 sqf 't. :h FFE=859.2.+ OD 322.9 7� QiU=LLLW !J/ c rL I'l I '2 !2 0 cli MMIM pj-K ph 9520330972 Fm 9529331153 %, AV . cow Edlma. MN 55435 Lflner Investment Woup LP EDINA BYERLY'S E -4 WMA 25PO OF FFE-WI.V A ❑ PROJECT SITE PLAN t k X9RTTT 7 a e!%i@T!TT SCALE IN FEET Figure # 1 Project # 2012135.M li rnlF C7 cL N 2008 RLK INC. LEGEND EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL EXISTING STOP CONTROL tt Ph,=; 952 933 0972 Fm 952 9331153 -') 1 6110 B6u Cinle Dfly • Subc 100 • �eroa1�+, MN SSW EDINA BYERLY'S EXISTING GEOMETRICS Figure 2 Project # 2012135M A Figure 3 - Aerial Photo of Existing Conditions ie T F a. s. RLK Incorporated Page 32 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M ;L)2005 RLK INC. s a� �n3n I 4-225 726! 24 24 . v 44-164 266 5 21 ti 10 21 O N 1 11 ' � N r I.. � = 4 n I _ - r 13 17 M aj 1 q 32 57; rm i :'14. e•�- a ;7'r' P - - 771 t% v �.. r- en� - r 53 7 - nk _ 350 297 16 n °r - li ' r i -4 1.111& - ! 191 .] • +!+ l .- WWW { 7rafii�. D I61ec�+s m ; Fum6ur __..._ 1 Real-Property Oalrry 4 C;it Lim � , Mnranpemmynn yr I Gplla9hertYr yy.� _ Laeeen � ' RGCCO AItafx 11 wopflu m__ _ 1 i � Ftat:x• Office Prr,l RrShlp - — 2 r e•i .9est Ca.= it Q 1 wr - 7 r l � �•I� � J _ 5 7 -w 1 .6 I Imev!rr kt) 12 Efs Ital 0 fcoe. CesEre: 5 5 v;e_ Ica isl5u-ver. U5Gp Fa;m °er.i;t iV 7 EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL EXISTING STOP CONTROL Ir.— ;9529330M \ / Fes 952 933 1'.53 � 6 6110M Cl d. Drly • Sub. 100 • *s-- ertnnin, Mai 1 55343 EDINA BYERLY'S EXISTING VOLUMES LEGEND EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL EXISTING STOP CONTROL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR XXX VOLUMES SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK XXX HOUR VOLUMES Flgurs 4 Project / 2012135M 2 0 N d i; a N ��-'—�"�,. _ .. , — • ,• • ,,,yam o ti �. �� u�""'�:"`� =L-�i A nay at. f nor 4°-i 232 N I3J� .y S2n 96 4 in 25 25 779 _ 4x169 7EE 55 73 En ra l'v-r - +r .Yr 4 �1 i Y i ' tj•t o t .^ . i y irRL ...-1�.•ftp . i f - Paa 10 29 A y tMi' Traffic SCALE IN FEET orm ;.v. a a- 7 ♦- •fit I" i 13 184 an,� - 16 0' i 33 SB � t '. � � d 1 � t -..-- m _ tt�l 311 SOY r -4 v V 4 0 'i-5 1 258 21E 369 n a ♦ _ _ _ lib 191- r 4 1 I 4 1 � C � ! i \ i;♦ � �� e1 MVVb CL r I; S 44 - ` 1 • - .. . -.,e 5 -, - e , ry..._ .1n _. e� 4 ESL 90 i� 1� 33 152 M 43 09 — !/ ' r� . " !- »".Y .� - 1. � � : 1'i � •`} rte' -� mr t: qs t LEGEND SIGNAL CONTROL _ STOP CONTROL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR x r r ,`X 1r� VOLUMES XXX IrR�ger/ZU12Ci9itnlDlu _. G_ cye c s �.tc uisu s a T __ ,icy �G SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK XXX HOUR VOLUMES tt M lirtmn3�' M�IQ N i_K MnIll661�R¢ MN r 1111eA "'- F. a=:95293309T2 Ier 952 9331153 c �� •pww:lkincwm 6110 Blue Citde Ddve • Sube 100 Minaemnln, MN 55343 EDINA BYERLY'S 2015 NO -BUILD PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS Figure 5 Project / 2012135M 2008 RLK INu. II 1, 4 Y ,.. i l 9 scxF lx FEET ► �; �. - _ _ - ► MM i �a o ' F — - -- — _ — —� .) A _ _ ._l_ r- z r- ^� CA _- 111 � • = ti =: a— I _z �,r it — - -; 3 s� a - LEGEND EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL � EXISTING STOP CONTROL LANE DESIGNATION z PROPOSED SIGNAL CONTROL Im9aemj 012 Digital Glcee. cezEye: U 5 Cc : I ,di.:I5�rv9y, US�a F' er,i:eAg PROPOSED RIGHT —IN/ RIr`UT_!11 IT c RLK 1ho :952933Q912 fox 9529331!53 6110 Hlu Circle Dd— • Suhe 1 W • bllnncft- % MN 55343 EDINA BYERLY'S PROPOSED GEOMETRICS Figure 6 Project # 2012135M a d a` N N 2008 RLK INC. I • C e. fir. x + 4-762 1721 0 4 18 M O 22 25 ! N 291 412 lyy. 4 j 138 12'0 ai u iri wWll•• i l . 119t t .. t � 4La1 5 22 p n ^ :a .tr., - 76 55S P '6 1-w�.l ,ti 1 i; T • . i i 3e0 306 n i ;• IN FEET TTT �r' I. 1 1 t � � �7f ws _} ee 47 r I I t I ._ ���M. •�_ xe nl dii 1 ! � r ar r t . y• _ 1 (•i � rT ` � � �� �rCpJ �. •f : _- F _ e^ - � � „� � sji ty�:A 2 0 •IFF St coq .._� n n m �-t ra V 4 0 336 ll 257 j-42 71 �ew 166 221 + o i 0 !j 0 N _ _ ' n 927 ry r 439 n3 - 74S N $ '2e 71 1 11 - r i, �_ ('1 l r, ,°�' no tae t f :t'z•- :S� 0 2 -n 4X77 1� � a •ter 64 147-+ 7 1 Irragery'4Z1112Qiultel6lcae. eeaEYe. = s A1e:m _4" Ica - ■ 6110 Blau Ord. Dd- • Sine 100 • J4lnaem.1m MN 54343 EDINA BYERLY'S LEGEND SIGNAL CONTROL STOP CONTROL irFa 17 r,4.• Map Traffic WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR xxx VOLUMES SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK xxx HOUR VOLUMES 2015 BUILD PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS Flgure 7 Project # 2012135M n H.rn 1.iS NN .� t = MN I 17= 952 9331153 - ■ 6110 Blau Ord. Dd- • Sine 100 • J4lnaem.1m MN 54343 EDINA BYERLY'S LEGEND SIGNAL CONTROL STOP CONTROL irFa 17 r,4.• Map Traffic WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR xxx VOLUMES SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK xxx HOUR VOLUMES 2015 BUILD PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS Flgure 7 Project # 2012135M or O a O K 0 `o G C: U a 0 0 'M2008 RLK INc: �''' ♦ 4-165 1741 b 4 18 .' :• • .r o = 23 27 304 423 .1 V 144 176 ry ..rir.•.F 0,,t�'�tt .. -, r %a-LI �4Y 11 �., f.■ 1 1 5 22 h P 76 56S P . QAALE IN r _ _ e 111 v H,w.. n 17 5 p •, w n m 12 0 J.. FI 33 59 Qi • 1:- .r 4 0 259 176 Ec a n ry ;56 66 170 2 0 n w 0 1 1 6n 'r !e . ~ 4 D - 1 Ufn ••. 3000 _ ��:.aaa� � . « a: re7 LJ f I r ' To ffi� r i - a y it a u4. � i •► ,. '-a. .:. LEGEND SIGNAL CONTROL STOP CONTROL • ', *'` _ _ r' s WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR INPR VOLUMES XhX 1 ` A SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK Imeperyan12C101tn101c. HOUR VOLUMES XXX E rt HAM Lke, NR: N IIIbhfn{1, 30V mN 1' In,=: 952 733 0472 Pis 952 9331153 � 1 6110 Hlue Circle Drtm • Sahe 100 • Mlnnsmnka, MN 55343 EDINA BYERLY'S 2016 BUILD PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS I^ Figure 8 Project / 2012135M v 0 m L L N E 0 0 N N C Q 0 2008 RLK INC. C1 N ''7 V o R r .rte 1➢bhlrg,?•(1: 1'==; 952 933 0972 F= 952 933 115 i ,ww'li- 6110 Blue CA.] Ddv • Smhe 100 • Nfln —cmnl k 1L1 55343 EDINA BYERLY'S Figure I +. Project # 2016 BUILD PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS - WITH RESTAURANT 2012135M APPENDICES See Technical Appendices (bound separately) for Intersection LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersection operational performance reports and queuing analyses for each scenario. RLK Incorporated Page 39 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M c VK VM S-S� &-Vk i�o VK . 4",Q- '-TA t1wi-4 V�, 610 k�-40 ul� C- V�A �'(� . II/� c �, 1� r 1 n � � P P wV �s �� 2 0 F�1s dik 6AS ll� a � u�v� -cam. �-wv� -C� P �'�\�- uo yyl (5-- q, V\lv(cs; �e x eR I UL Of 6S is f-Y & . .......... oj (Kll� mow. ,: ..�- ; 1 w Z Ill Q w U Z Q - -PYLON SIGN EWS-6 FiAZELTOI BOA -�,J PYLON SIGN -� Illillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ■ ■Schafer Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS Comprehensive Building & Development Services M aR 0 4 `1ti13 REVISED SITE PLAN 0 IV 36 NORTH BENCH SEATING Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue Re- Development EDINA, MN 3 -7 -2013 1 15226 -11051 To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks and Recreation Director Date: March 19, 2013 Subject: Golf Dome Settlement and Bid Awards v o . eo 0 j roRroo T Agenda Item #: VIII.A Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Approve the reconstruction of the golf dome with the insurance settlement; award bids as presented for the dome fabric, turf, dome foundation renovation and steel driving deck; and grant approval to seek bids for the fire suppression system, storm sewer and storm water retention system and to seek quotes for the construction of the new support building. Information I Background: Please see the attached Executive Summary from RJM Construction regarding the details of the insurance settlement and dome construction project. Attached is also a listing of recommended contract awards. Attachments: Braemar Golf Dome Executive Summary Recommendations for Award of Contract City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 1 MINNEAPOLIS / PHOENIX / DENVER Braemar Golf Dome Replacement CONSTRUCTION RJM Executive Summary Prepared for Ann Kattreh, Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Edina Prepared by Brian Recker, Senior Vice President, RJM Construction Date: March 13, 2013 Background In 2012 the Braemar Golf Dome was damaged by a fire, causing the loss of its air supported golf dome and damage to its attached support building. Subsequent to this loss, the City of Edina notified its insurance agent of the loss and a claim was filed for the recovery of the required facility reconstruction costs. In order to begin the process of design and construction for the repairs the City of Edina hired Cuningham Group as the architect and a RJM Construction as the construction manager. The existing facility was constructed in 1983 and was designed in a manner that the support building was attached directly to the dome. Due to concerns of the original design with long term eccentric loading that the dome placed on the existing building from snow and wind loads, the City Staff decided that rather than repair the existing building, to pursue a replacement building that was separate from the dome, attached only by a connecting link. The design size of the new replacement building is slightly smaller in size to that of the existing support building. The replacement dome will be installed upon the existing underground foundations, which were not damaged in the fire. Thus the size of the dome will not be changed. Required Code Upgrades and Site Renovations It was identified that since the original dome and support building construction were constructed in 1983, several building codes have been enacted that needed to be included in the reconstruction of the facility. The list of required code upgrades that have been included in the architectural design documents are noted below: • Fire suppression system throughout the dome • Egress sidewalks at entry points to the facility • Emergency egress hardware at exit gates from the facility In order to provide the new code required fire suppression system an 8" water supply line is required to be provided from the street to the support building. This new line is significantly larger than the existing service line currently supplying the building. To install this new underground supply line, a significant amount of soil excavation required. The Watershed District regulations indicate that if more than 50 cubic yards of soil is disturbed on the project site, that new watershed site design requirements be included with the work. Since this. new supply line will greatly exceed this maximum limit, these requirements have been included in the design. These requirements include modifications to the existing grades, resulting in a new parking lot, a new retaining wall, and concrete curbs. Also included is a new underground water retention system located directly under the area of the parking lot. Insurance Reimbursement The City of Edina holds three separate insurance policies on the existing facility. One policy is for the dome replacement, another is for the support building replacement and the last is for the cost of code required upgrades. The initial offer for reimbursement by the City's insurance company in April of 2012 was $931,694. However, after extensive work by the City Staff, RJM Construction and Cuningham Group, and several meetings with the City's insurance company, the final reimbursement offer has increased to $2,600,507. In summary, the efforts made over the last year have resulted in a net increase in the insurance reimbursement of $1,668,813. The graph below illustrates the final negotiated insurance offer for each of the policies, as compared to the individual maximum policy limit. $1,720,800 $1,475,060 Dome Policy City of Edina, Braemar Golf Dome Insurance Settlement per Policy $1,000,000 $944,400 $239,903 $181,047 Dome Support Building Code Upgrade Policy cs Policy Limit ■ Final Insurance Offer Design of Elevated Driving Deck During the design discussions, the City raised concerns related to the existing condition of the wood driving deck. Although the deck was not permanently damaged as a result of the fire, the wood deck system has continued to decline due to its age. It was discussed that the replacement of this system with one constructed of structural steel and concrete would provide a structure that would last the lifecycle of the new facility, requiring minimal maintenance relative to the existing wood deck structure. It was also determined that installing this new system during the reconstruction of the dome was significantly more economical that replacing it at a later date. Photos of the existing wood deck system are reflected below. Side View Showing Out of Plumb Columns Under Deck View Showing Start of Wood Decay Proiect Bids and Current Project Budget To date there have been public bids received for the dome replacement, along with the replacement of the dome turf. In addition, several quotes have been received for other required work related to the site. The only remaining public bids to be received are for the underground storm retention system and the fire suppression system of the dome, along with quotes for the construction of the new support building. Based on the bids and quotes received and established budgets by R1M Construction for the remaining bids and quotes to be submitted, the total project budget is $3,353,700. This includes costs for architectural design as well as construction management fees. The difference between the current total project budget and the insurance reimbursement is $753,193. Value of Proiect Investment Although the net cost of the project to the City of Edina is $753,193, there are significant upgrades in the project that greatly exceed this investment. These upgrades include: • A new 1900 square foot commercially designed support building • A new asphalt parking lot, with new curbs and retaining wall system • A new fire suppression system for the dome • A new structural steel and concrete upper level driving deck • A new underground site water retention system • A new back -up generator for the fire suppression system • New concrete sidewalks to public exiting areas The approximate value for these upgrades totals $1,594,000, resulting in an added net value to the project of $840,807. Proiect Alternates During the design process, there was pricing for two. project alternates that the staff has recommended to present to the City Council. These alternates and their respective pricing are listed below: Alternate 1— Upgrade the dome membrane to a Tedlar Coating. This Teflon -type coating better sheds dirt and snow and extends the life of the fabric by approximately 5 years. The cost for this alternate is $146,230. Alternate 2 — Insulate the walls of the dome and provide an opaque finish up to fifty feet high. This insulation will improve the energy efficiency in the winter. The un- insulated area at the top of the dome allows day lighting and adds to the shedding of the snow. The cost for this alternate is $82,283. The costs for these alternates have not been included in the total project budget of $3,353,700. Council approval of alternates 1 or 2 would increase the total project budget by their respective amounts. Request at City Council Meeting At the March 19th City Council Meeting we would request two actions be made and approved in order to maintain our current construction schedule. The first action would be to approve the total project budget, along with any requested project alternates. The second action would be to approve the recommended contract awards for the bids and the quotes received to date. The summary of proposed awards will be provided in a separate document for review by the City Council and Staff. The third action would be to approve the advertisement for the last two public bid packages required to_ be bid. This would include the fire suppression system for the dome as well as the underground storm retention system. Schedule Considering a City Council approval of the bids and quotes on March 19th we expect to start construction in early May with a planned completion by November 15S It is our intention to present the recommendation for award of the remaining public bids and the quotes for the support building construction at the May 7th City Council meeting. End of Executive Summary CONSTRUCTION MINNEAPOLIS / PHOENIX / DENVER March 13, 2013 Ann Kattreh City of Edina 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Recommendations for Award of Contract — Bid Package I Dear Ann, On November 8, 2012 bids were received at the City of Edina for Braemar Golf Dome Replacement - Bid Package 1. A total of 4 bids were received for two (2) bid categories. Also, a total (4 1) of quotes were received by RJM Construction for (12) quote categories. Attached is a bid summary by trade for each bid category and quote category. After reviewing the budget with the City of Edina staff we recommend to accept / reject the project add alternates: 1 — upgrade the dome membrane to a Tedlar Coating $146,230 and 2 — insulate the walls of the dome and provide an opaque finish up to fifty feet high $82,283. See the Executive Summary for further descriptions of each of the alternates listed. Note should one or both the alternates be selected various contract amounts would be revised. RJM has completed its review of the bids and in addition to the bid review, we have also conducted a scope review with the apparent low bidder for each bid and quote category. Based on the results of these reviews we recommend to the City Council that they award the contracts as follows: Bid Categories Bid Category 13A — Air Supported Dome Fabric Systems Arizon Structures Award Amount: $632,999 11800 Dorsett Road Maryland Heights, MO 63043 Bid Category 32A — Synthetic Sports Turf Systems Pro Grass LLC Award Amount: $204,098 960 Penn Ave, 8'h Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222. Quote Categories Quote Category 2A — Selective Demolition Lloyds Construction Services, Inc. Award Amount: $35,210 7207 West 128'h Street Savage, MN 55378 Quote Category 3A — Cast -In -Place Concrete Donald R Frantz Concrete Construction, LLC Award Amount: $76,740 595 Randolph Avenue St Paul, MN 55102 Quote Category 5A — Structural Steel and Misc. Metals (mat'l only) Linco Companies Award Amount: _ $99,700 12786 601h Street NE St Michael, MN 55376 Quote Category 5A — Structural Steel and Misc. Metals (labor only) KMH Erectors, Inc. Award Amount: $35,900 PO Box 37 Maple Plain, MN 55359 Quote Category — Painting Swanson & Youngdale Award Amount: $19,265 6565 West 23rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55426 Quote Category 22A — Plumbing Northern Mechanical Contractors Award Amount: $3,500 3650 Kennebec 4102 Eagan, MN 55122 Quote Category 26A — Electrical Muska Electric Award Amount: $97,870 1985 Oakcrest Avenue Roseville, MN 55113 Quote Category 31A —Excavation Dome Lloyds. Construction Services, Inc. Award Amount: $60,949 7207 West 128`h Street Savage, MN 55378 Quote Category 31A — Excavation Site Lloyds Construction Services, Inc. Award Amount: $75,875 7207 West 128'h Street Savage, MN 55378 Quote Category 32A — Asphalt Paving Northland Paving Award Amount: $53,000 21716 Kenrick Avenue, Suite A Lakeville, MN 55044 Quote Category 32B — Site Concrete Minnesota State Curb -Gutter Award Amount: $19,550 14698 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 Quote Category 32C — Site Fence Midwest Commercial Fence Award Amount: $15,865 PO Box 223 South St Paul, MN 55075 Quote Category 32D — Retaining Walls Sunram Construction, Inc. Award Amount: $15,421 20010 75`h Avenue North Corcoran, MN 55340 Quote Category 33A — Site Utility St Paul Utility Award Amount: $71,800 190 Ryan Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 The Architect continues to finalize the design for the new building at the site. Upon completion of the design, RJM will solicit contractors for the building and make further recommendations for approval of this work. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Brian G. Recker Senior Vice President Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Bid Package 1 [aid Summary Trade November 8, 20101 2 Bid Category 13A Air Supported Dome Fabric Systems CONeTCYCTION Company Base Bid Bid Addenda Alt #1 Outer Membrane Top Finish Alt #2 Insulation Total Contract Security 4 Outer Membrane: SEAMAN 8028 Insulation & opaque membrane Arizon Structures $632,999.00 yes 4 $128,886.00 $72,524.00 $632,999.00 Yeadon Domes $769,950.00 yes 4 $177,000.00 $98,600.00 $769,950.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Bid Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade November S, 2012 Bid Category 32A - Synthetic Sports Turf Systems CONSTRUCTION Company Base Bid Bid Security Addenda 4 Alt #4 Turf B with Pad Turf B- ProGrass Extreme Alt #5 Turf A with Pad Turf AonE- Layer Alt # 6 Turf B with E -Layer Turf B- ProGrass Extreme with E -layer Total Contract ProGrass no bid yes 4 $204,098.00 no bid $305,234.00 $204.098.00 Bever Landscape Design $287,300.00 yes 4 no bid no bid no bid $287,300. 0 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 2A Selective Demolition CONSTRUCTIJON Company Base Bid Addenda Total Contract 2 Lloyd's Construction Services $35,210.00 2 $35,210.00 Ramsey Excavation $41,825.00 - $41,825.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 3A Cast -In -Place Concrete CONSTRUCTION Company Base Bid Addenda 2 Total Contract Donald R Frantz Concrete $76,740.00 2 $76,740.00 Axel H Ohman $88,000.00 - $88,000.00 Kelleher $127,442.00 - $127,442.00 Crosstown Masonry $115,170.00 2 $115,170.00 Gresser $172,025.00 - $172,025.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category SAStructural Steel & Misc. Metals (Mat'I Only) CONSTRUCT40H Company Base Bid Addenda Total Contract 2 Unco Companies $99,700.00 2 $99,700.00 Camelot Metals, Inc. $142,100.00 2 $142,100.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 5AStructural Steel & Misc. Metals (Labor Only) C0NSTQUCTOON Company Base Bid Addenda 2 Total Contract KMH Erectors $35,900.00 2 $35,900.00 Patriot Erectors $47,750.00 2 $47,750.00 Bald Eagle Erectors $47,900.00 2 $47,900.00 Linco Companies $57,560.00 2 $57,560.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category Paintin CONSTRUCT30N Company Base Bid Addenda Total Contract 2 Swanson & Youn dale $19,265.00 2 $19,265.00 DLcor -tec $23,980.00 2 $23,980.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1. Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 TV Quote Category 22A Plumbing CO NSTRUCTiION Bid Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 26A Electrical Ity CO NSTRUCT11ON Company Base Bid Addenda Total Contract 2 Muska Electric $97,870.00 2 $97,870.00 Mayer Electric $114,147.00 2 $114,147.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 31A Excavation - Dome CONSTRUCTOON ontract Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category Construction 31A Excavation - Site Base Bid CONSTRUCTOON Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 32A Asphalt Paving CONSTaucTnON Company Base Bid - Addenda 2 Total Contract Northland Paving $53,300.00 2 $53,300.00 Bituminous Roadways $56,190.00 2 $56,190.00 Northwest Asphalt $58,393.00 2 $58,393.00 Midwest Asphalt $71,250.00 - $71250.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 32B Site Concrete no CONSTRUCTION Company Base Bid Addenda 2 Total Contract MN State Curb Gutter $19,550.00 2 $19,550.00 Curb Masters $20,240.00 2 $20,240.00 North Country Concrete $21,225.00 - $21,225.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 32C Site Fence sp CONSTRUCTOON Company Base Bid Addenda Total Contract 2 Midwest Fence $15,865.00 2 $15,865.00 Keller Fence $14,920.00 2 $14,920.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 321) Retaining Walls CoNSTRUCTOON Company Base Bid Addenda Total Contract 2 Sunram Construction $15,421.00 2 $15,421.00 Structures $17,999.00 2 $17,999.00 Braemar Golf Dome Replacement Quote Package 1 Bid Summary by Trade March 13, 2013 Quote Category 33A Site Utility - water & sanitary no CONSTRUCTIION Total Contract r f' ►ANA. (oyLe p �.Al 0 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. B. From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Action Discussion ❑ Date: March 19, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2013 -3 Amending Chapter 4 Concerning Demolition Permits For Single And Double Dwelling Units Action Requested: Adopt Ordinance No. 2013 -3 Amending Chapter 4 Concerning Demolition Permits For Single And Double Dwelling Units. Information / Background: At its February 19 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff and City Attorney to review the City's "Construction Management Plan" (CMP) document and procedures in order to evaluate the overall use and effectiveness of the CMP in regulating residential redevelopment projects. I worked with City Attorney Knutson and City staff leadership on that review, which has resulted in a proposed new regulatory ordinance and enforcement plan. I distributed a draft of the proposed ordinance and enforcement plan to the Council at the March 5 Council meeting and informed the Council of my intent to advance the ordinance to the Council for adoption at the March 19 Council meeting. The material changes in City Code and enforcement strategy can be summarized as follows: New Regulatory Ordinance - Ordinance 2013 -3 is attached to this memorandum. The City Attorney drafted the new ordinance based on the current Construction Management Plan (CMP). The attached draft has been reviewed by City staff and is ready for review and adoption by the City Council. Generally, it incorporates the terms of the CMP into Chapter 4 of the City Code, which gives the City a fully enforceable CMP that is backed by the authority of our City Code. Ordinance 2013 -3 will more strongly leverage the issuance of the demolition permit. A demolition permit will not be issued unless the permit applicant can demonstrate ownership of the property. Ordinance 2013- 3 requires a number of new conditions that must be satisfied before the issuance of the demolition permit Some of those new conditions include: 1. Proof of insurance; naming City as additional insured 2. Submission of $10,000 cash escrow or letter of credit 3. Submission of soil investigation report 4. Submission of storm water management and erosion control plans S. Submission of photography of existing conditions in neighborhood City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 6. Submission of proposed building plans to the Building Official 7. Facilitation of a neighborhood meeting to share building plans with neighbors New Enforcement Plan — The City's enforcement response to the quality of life issues created by residential redevelopments has been a somewhat passive. Staff responded to calls for service, but did not actively monitor redevelopment sites for compliance. We depended on neighbors and interested residents to assist us with that function. Also, requests for enforcement came to the City in an uncoordinated manner. The City's enforcement actions were also not coordinated well. As I expect the pace and volume of residential redevelopment to increase in Edina, I believe it is necessary to shift our enforcement strategy from passive to active enforcement and also to better coordinate our regulatory enforcement functions. My plan to accomplish both of these objectives is to focus the responsibility and accountability for managing the City's regulatory enforcement duties into a single new fulltime enforcement employee (FTE). The new FTE will be responsible for coordinating all aspects of the residential redevelopment process for builders, potential new residents, current residents and City staff. The new FTE will also coordinate the pre - permit neighborhood meeting; conduct site reconnaissance; answer questions from concerned residents; coordinate City enforcement actions; and keep City staff and Council informed through the redevelopment process. estimate the cost of this new enforcement initiative to be approximately $100,000 per year. In order to fund this new FTE, I recommend the City increase the price of the demolition permit from its current price of approximately $200 to $1,500. City staff are projecting the City will issue a total of 100 demolition permits in 2013. If we issue 70 permits under the new permit price, we will be able to cover the cost of the new FTE through this new revenue source. The price change for this permit is included in Ordinance 2013- 3. SUMMARY The challenge the City is facing with residential redevelopment is not insurmountable. It is a challenge we should welcome because of what is says about the desirability of the community. I believe the City can manage its residential redevelopment challenges better if we, as Council and staff, are willing to change our approach to the challenge. I recommend the City Council approve the proposed new regulatory ordinance and the new enforcement plan, which includes full adoption of Ordinance 2013 -3 at the March 19 City Council meeting. If adopted by the Council, staff will immediately begin the search process for the new FTE; begin communicating our new standards to residents, builders and developers; and begin the drafting of new policies and procedures to implement the new ordinance requirements. ti ORDINANCE NO. 2013-3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 1 AND 4 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING DEMOLITION PERMITS FOR SINGLE AND DOUBLE DWELLING UNITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 4 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding Section 411 to read: Section 411— DEMOLITION PERMITS FOR SINGLE AND DOUBLE DWELLILNG UNITS 411.01 Purpose. The demolition of single or double dwelling units and the subsequent construction of a new dwelling unit can disrupt the quietude of the neighborhood, damage adjacent public and private property, create storm water and erosion problems, and result in littering and other nuisances. The purpose of this Section is to prevent problems associated with the demolition of single and double dwelling units and the construction of new dwellings. 411.02 Permit. The demolition of single or double dwelling units is prohibited without a permit issued by the Building Official. 411.03 Demolition Defined. Demolition is defined as removal or destruction of more than fifty percent (50 %) of the area of the exterior walls (in aggregate); or the removal or destruction of more than fifty percent (50 %) of the area of the principal roof structure (not including roofing material, fascia, soffit, eave moldings, or dormers). 411.04 Permit Application. The applicant must complete the application form provided by the City, pay the permit fee and furnish the City with the certificate of insurance, letter of credit, photographs and plans required by this Section. The application must be signed by the contractor and the property owner. The permit holder must be both the contractor and the property owner. 411.05 Permit Requirements. Subd. 1 The applicant must furnish the City with a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the following required coverage: Commercial general liability, including XCU coverage: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non - owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence Ordinance No. 2013 -3 Page 2 $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence The minimum insurance coverage must be maintained until six (6) months after the demolition has been completed or, if a new dwelling is being constructed, a certificate of occupancy has been issued. The City must be named as an additional insured. Subd. 2 The applicant must furnish the City a cash escrow or letter of credit from a bank in a form acceptable to the City's Finance Director for Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars. The City may draw on the letter of credit to reimburse the City to pay for the repair of damage to public and private property or to remedy any permit violation. The letter of credit must remain in place until the demolition is completed or, if a new dwelling is' being constructed, until a certificate of occupancy has been issued by the Building Official. Subd. 3 If excavation will occur within ten (10) feet of a property line, the applicant must furnish a soils investigation report prepared and signed by a registered professional engineer, who is competent in soil mechanics. The report must provide detailed plans to ensure that adjacent property will not be damaged by reducing lateral support for driveways, foundations, fences or lawns caused by excavation, demolition or construction activity. The report must be approved by the Building Official. The permit holder must adhere to the approved plan. Subd. 4 The applicant must submit stormwater and erosion control plans prepared and signed by a registered professional civil engineer. The plans must be approved by the Building Official and the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans. The stormwater management plan must detail how stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainage system. The erosion control plan must document how proper erosion and sediment control will be maintained on a continual basis to contain on -site erosion and protect on and off -site vegetation. Permit holder must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices at all time during the project when soil disturbing activities may result in sediment laden storm water runoff entering the inlet. The permit holder is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. Devices must be regularly cleaned out and emergency overflow must be an integral part of the device to reduce the flooding potential. Devices must be placed to prevent the creation of driving hazards or obstructions. Subd. 5 The applicant must provide photographs of the existing condition of the property, curbs, sidewalks, streets, boulevard and trees adjacent to the property. Subd. 6 If a new dwelling will be constructed on the site, the applicant must furnish the City building plans for the new dwelling, meeting all ordinance requirements, which have been approved by the Building Official. Subd. 7 At least fifteen (15) days before demolition commences, the permit holder must provide written notification to all property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the demolition site notifying the property owners of the proposed demolition and construction plans, if applicable, and inviting them to a neighborhood meeting at the r Ordinance No. 2013 -3 Page 3 Edina City Hall. The neighborhood meeting must be held at least five (5) days before demolition commences. A sign must also be posted on the demolition site at least five (5) days before demolition commences identifying the permit holder, a contact name and phone number, and the site address. The sign must also provide a City phone number to call with any questions, complaints or concerns. The sign may not exceed six (6) square feet. The sign must be kept in place until the completion of demolition or if a new dwelling is being constructed until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the dwelling being constructed. 411.06 Permit Standards. Subd. 1 The permit holder must comply with the State Building Code, State Statutes and the City Code. Subd. 2 Deliveries of equipment and material to the site, work crews on site and construction and demolition activity are prohibited except between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Subd. 3 The permit holder must repair any damage to public property, streets, sidewalks and adjacent properties. If damage occurs to the foregoing, it must be repaired within three (3) working days, unless the permit holder has received written permission from the Building Official to delay repairs to a later specified date. Subd. 4 Permit holder must maintain a five -foot (5') parking setback from driveways and a thirty -foot (30') parking setback from intersections. When parking on a street, a vehicle must be completely located on the street surface, parallel to and within twelve (12) inches of the curb. Vehicles in violation of these requirements may be towed in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 168B.035. On street parking of equipment other than motor vehicles is prohibited. Stopping, standing or parking a vehicle is prohibited, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following places: a. On a boulevard between the sidewalk and roadway; b. Within five (5) feet of the intersection of any public or private driveway or alley with any street or highway; C. Where the vehicle will block a fire escape or the exit from any building; d. Where temporary signs prohibit parking. Parking is allowed on local streets if a twelve -foot (12') wide area is open for the traveled portion of the road. On collector and arterial roadways, a minimum of twenty - two feet (22') must be open for the traveled portion of the road. Off- street and off -site parking for on site workers is required to the extent practicable. Subd. 5 The permit holder must install and maintain a rock entrance pad or its equivalent at each location where vehicles enter or exit from the construction site, at locations approved by the Building Official. Ordinance No. 2013 -3 Page 4 Subd. 6 The site must be maintained in a neat and orderly condition. Prior to leaving the construction site at the end of each day, permit holder must remove empty cans, paper, plastic and other material that is not needed for construction. The permit holder must keep, streets, sidewalks, boulevard areas and adjacent properties clean from waste, materials or refuse resulting from operations on the site. Inoperable equipment and equipment not being used on the site must be removed within twenty four (24) hours. Where work on any project lies within areas of pedestrian traffic or vehicular traffic, the project area must be cleaned and swept and all materials related to the project must be stockpiled in appropriate areas. Debris must be contained on the project site. No material may be deposited or stockpiled on the public streets, boulevards or sidewalks. At the end of each working day, the permit holder must remove any soil, trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any public sidewalk or street and must remove any trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any adjacent property. Subd. 7 Dust control is the responsibility of the permit holder. The permit holder must eliminate dust problems within one (1) hour of receiving notice from the Building Official that there is a dust problem. Subd. 8 No building material, temporary sanitary facilities, dumpster or equipment other then motor vehicles may be placed within street right -of -way, or on a sidewalk. Public sidewalks must be left open and unobstructed at all times. Subd. 9 Prior to commencing demolition, protective fencing approved by the Building Official must be installed around boulevard trees and trees that will not be removed. 411.07 Stop Work Orders. If the Building Official finds any work being performed in a dangerous or unsafe manner or that is in violation of the provisions of the permit, City Code or the State Building Code, the Building Official may issue a stop work order. The stop work order must be in writing and issued to the permit holder or the person doing the work. Upon issuance of a stop work order, the cited work must immediately cease. The stop work order must state the reason for the order and the conditions under which the cited work will be permitted to resume. 411.08 Misdemeanor. Violations of this Section or of the terms'of approval of a permit issued under this Section are a misdemeanor. Section 2. Chapter 1 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following fee: Section Subsection 411 411.04 Purpose of Fee or Chanae demolition permit for single and double dwelling Units Amount $1,500.00 Section 3. This ordinance is effective upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Ordinance No. 2013 -3 Page 5 Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. C. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: March 19, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -28 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipients departments for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -28 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-28 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Lida Dehl Lois Peabody Eugene & Betty Ann Mielke Kurt & Pauline Philipps -Zabel George & Martha Knox Culp Constance Philipps Wet Paint, St. Paul Dated: March 19, 2013 Attest: Dried Flowers & Dowels $50.00 Helen Zabel Memorial $15.00 Helen Zabel Memorial $10.00 Helen Zabel Memorial $50.00 Helen Zabel Memorial $100.00 Helen Zabel Memorial $100.00 Helen Zabel Memorial Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 19, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk � REPORT /RECOMMENDATION r. dll�l� To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: March 19, 2013 Subject: Traffic Safety Report Of January 2, 2013 roRpOAA� 1888 Agenda Item #k VIII. D. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Review and approve the revised Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2013. Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the January 2, Traffic Safety Committee Report at their February 21 meeting and made the following comments: Item B I: Change the recommendation to: Staff recommends denial of request for stop signs at the intersection of Kellogg Avenue and 61 st Street West. Based on discussion of the February 21, 2013 ETC meeting staff also recommends adding an informational plaque to the existing yield signs that states "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop ". The requestors of Item B I addressed the ETC at their February 21 ETC meeting and have requested to address the City Council. The requestors would like to see the yield signs replaced with stop signs. Attachments: Revised Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2013 Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of February 21, 2013 Email dated March 10 from Constance Fantin G:\ Engineering \lntrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports\2013 \Item VIII. D. Traffic Safety Report of January 2, 2013.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT (Revised February 21, 2013) Wednesday, January 2, 2013 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on January 2. The Director of Engineering, Public Works Director, Police Traffic Supervisor, the Community Development Director, the Sign Coordinator, and Traffic Safety Coordinator were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the January 17, Edina Transportation Commission and the February 19 City Council.agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval: At this time, there are no requests that are recommended for approval. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: 1. This request was reviewed at the November 1 5th, 2012, ETC meeting. The ETC recommended the following: Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass for staff to evaluate moving the yield sign to 61St Street and to also evaluate installing stop signs since the basket weave is already in place and the stop sign would complete the weave. All voted aye. Motion carried. The request is to install stop signs at the intersection of Kellogg Avenue and 61 :t Street West; the intersection currently has yield signs on Kellogg Avenue. This was a second request to install stop signs at this location. The first request occurred in July of 2012, which the City Council concurred. A crash at this location in October prompted a second request to install stop signs at this location. 61St Street West and Kellogg Avenue are both classified as local streets, see map. Sight lines are very good for all four directions into the intersection, see photos. Two recorded accidents have occurred at this location since 2001; these accidents occurred in 2012, see attached 2012 Traffic and Crash Data for Kellogg and 61 st. Both accidents were caused by northbound vehicles that failed to yield to the east -west moving vehicles. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page I of 5 January 2, 2013 Map: 61St Street West and Kellogg Avenue Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 2 of 5 January 2, 2013 Photo 1: 61 st Street looking eastbound. Photo 2: Kellogg Ave looking northbound Photo 3: Kellogg Ave looking southbound The City of Edina has stop sign warrant polices that are based off of the Minnesota Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devises (MNMUTCD); however, these policies have not been updated with the new MNMUTCD, therefore staff is using the new MNMUTCD for analysis of the intersection. The MNMUTCD describes guidance and standards that should be used for installation of regulatory signs such as stop signs. The MNMUTCD guidance states: At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.8 and 2B.9). The use of STOP signs on the minor - street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 3 of 5 January 2, 2013 A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day, B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway, and /or C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12 -month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. Such crashes include right -angle collisions involving road users on the minor - street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. In many low volume situations with no unusual history of intersection crashes, no control at the intersections is a cost effective strategy. Research suggests that at most locations, increasing the level of intersection control will not improve safety (see FHWA -RD -81 -084 Stop, Yield and No Control at Intersections). Keep in mind that unwarranted placement of any sign can lead to negative consequences. Installing a stop sign without meeting the required warrants will reduce the effectiveness of all stop signs in the area. This reduced effectiveness is shown by an increase of vehicles, "rolling through" or entering the intersection at a higher rate of speed than the intersection is capable of handling. This increases the chance of crashes which will make the intersection more dangerous. Research has also shown that placing stop signs increases peak speed at the midblock of streets, because drivers will speed to regain lost time at stop signs. Yield signs have the benefit of assigning right -of -way only when needed. Stop signs will require vehicles to stop during non -peak times at the intersection. Other negative consequences include increased local pollution due to stopped vehicles, and an increase in noise due to vehicles accelerating after stopping. The total ADT entering the intersection equals 417 vehicles per day, which does not comply with the MNMUTCD. See attached traffic counts. Other warrants stated in the MNMUTCD for placing a Stop sign have also not been met. Staff also studied the turning movements of the intersection to see if the existing yield signs are placed on the correct street and also to be able to recommend which street a stop sign be placed if the ETC recommends to the City Council that stop signs be placed at this intersection, see attached turning movements. The turning movement conducted shows that a majority of afternoon peak travel traffic is travelling northbound and westbound at the intersection. This could indicate that traffic is using both streets as a cut - through to avoid other intersections in the area. Staff recommends denial of request for stop signs at the intersection of Kellogg Avenue and 61 st Street West. Based on discussion of the February 21, 2013 ETC meeting staff also recommends adding an informational plaque to the existing yield signs that states "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop ". SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. At this time, there are no requests that require deferral to a later date. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 4 of 5 January 2,2013 SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. I. Call from a resident inquiring about the plowing schedule for Edina streets. Call was forwarded. to Public Works, who manages the schedule for street plowing. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 5 of 5 January 2, 2013 'n),- A, Ok e ,,ss��z�,, Cn Ca I El E3 8 El E3 To: Edina Transportation Commission Agenda Item M VI. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action 0 Discussion ❑x Date: February 21, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2013 (Re- Review) Action Requested: Review and provide feedback. Information / Background: The ETC recommended that the traffic safety report of January 2 be forwarded to the City Council. The ETC discussed Item B I of the report. During this discussion it was asked if staff had contacted the requestor, which -I thought we had. I have since learned that the requestor had not been notified and they would like an opportunity to tall. with the ETC prior to the report being forwarded to the City Council. Attached you will find the Traffic Safety Report of January 2, 2013 along with correspondence from the requestor. Attachments: Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2013 Correspondence from requestor G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Agendas \2013 R &R \20130221 \Item VI.A. Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2013 (Re- Review).docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Byron Theis — Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: January 11, 2013 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2013 o'nIJOR9 C }sea / Agenda Item #: VI. B. Action Discussion ❑ information ❑ Action Requested: Review and recommend Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of Wednesday January 2, 2013, be forwarded to City Council for approval. Information/ Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the meeting regarding any of the attached issues. An overview of the comments from the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) will be included in the staff report provided to Council for their February 19, 2013 meeting. Attachments: Traffic Safety Review for January 2, 2013. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \Staff Review Summaries \12 TSAC & Min \01- 01- 13.docx City of Edina ^ 4801 W. 50th St. ^ Edina, MN 55424 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Wednesday, January 2, 2013 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on January 2. The Director of Engineering, Public Works Director, Police Traffic Supervisor, the Community Development Director, the Sign Coordinator, and Traffic Safety Coordinator were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the January 17, Edina Transportation Commission and the February 19 City Council agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval: At this time, there are no requests that are recommended for approval. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: 1. This request was reviewed at the November 15th, 2012, ETC meeting. The ETC recommended the following: Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass for staff to evaluate moving the yield sign to 61st Street and to also evaluate installing stop signs since the basket weave ' is already in place and the stop sign would complete the weave. All voted aye. Motion carried. The request is to install stop signs at the intersection of Kellogg Avenue and 61st Street West; the intersection currently has yield signs on Kellogg Avenue. This was a second request to install stop signs at this location. The first request occurred in July of 2012, which the City Council concurred. A crash at this location in October prompted a second request to install stop signs at this location. 61sT Street West and Kellogg Avenue are both classified as local streets, see map. Sight lines are very good for all four directions into the intersection, see photos. Two recorded accidents have occurred at this location since 2001; these accidents occurred in 2012, see attached 2012 Traffic and Crash Data for Kellogg and 61 st. Both accidents were caused by northbound vehicles that failed to yield to the east -west moving vehicles. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page I of 5 January 2, 2013 Map: 61s, Street West and Kellogg Avenue Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 2of5 January 2,2Ol] rp XII aF V'A AM Am 6.0"T.,4 - 06? .- Map: 61s, Street West and Kellogg Avenue Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 2of5 January 2,2Ol] Photo 3: Kellogg Ave looking southbound Photo 1: 61 st Street looking eastbound. Photo 2: Kellogg Ave looking northbound The City of Edina has stop sign warrant polices that are based off of the Minnesota Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devises (MNMUTCD); however, these policies have not been updated with the new MNMUTCD, therefore staff is using the new MNMUTCD for analysis of the intersection. The MNMUTCD describes guidance and standards that should be used for installation of regulatory signs such as stop signs. The MNMUTCD guidance states: At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.8 and 2B.9). The use of STOP signs on the minor - street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day, Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 3 of 5 January 2, 2013 B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway, and/or C Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12 -month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. Such crashes include right -angle collisions involving road users on the minor - street approach failing to yield the right- of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. In many low volume situations with no unusual history of intersection crashes, no control at the intersections is a cost effective strategy. Research suggests that at most locations, increasing the level of intersection control will not improve safety (see FHWA-RD-8 1 -084 Stop, Yield and No Control at Intersections). Keep in mind that unwarranted placement of any sign can lead to negative consequences. Installing a stop sign without meeting the required warrants will reduce the effectiveness of all stop signs in the area. This reduced effectiveness is shown by an increase of vehicles, "rolling through" or entering the intersection at a higher rate of speed than the intersection is capable of handling. This increases the chance of crashes which will make the intersection more dangerous. Research has also shown that placing stop signs increases peak speed at the midblock of streets, because drivers will speed to regain lost time at stop signs. Yield signs have the benefit of assigning right -of -way only when needed. Stop signs will require vehicles to stop during non -peak times at the intersection. Other negative consequences include increased local pollution due to stopped vehicles, and an increase in noise due to vehicles accelerating after stopping. The total ADT entering the intersection equals 417 vehicles per day, which does not comply with the MNMUTCD. See attached traffic counts. Other warrants stated in the MNMUTCD for placing a Stop sign have also not been met. Staff also studied the turning movements of the intersection to see if the existing yield signs are placed on the correct street and also to be able to recommend which street a stop sign be placed if the ETC recommends to the City Council that stop signs be placed at this intersection, see attached turning movements. The turning movement conducted shows that a majority of afternoon peak travel traffic is travelling northbound and westbound at the intersection. This could indicate that traffic is using both streets as a cut - through to avoid other intersections in the area. Staff recommends denial of request for stop signs at the intersection of Kellogg Avenue and 61 st Street West.. However, based on the intersection turning movements staff recommends that the Yield signs be moved to 61 st Street West.. Of the ETC and the City Council wish to install stop signs at this location staff recommends that they be installed on 61st Street Chest. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. ,A,t this time, there are no requests that require deferral to a later date. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 4 of 5 January 2, 2013 SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. I. Call from a resident inquiring about the plowing schedule for Edina streets. Call was forwarded to Public Works, who manages the schedule for street plowing. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 5 of 5 January 2, 2013 � y 20`li 2 Traffoc and Crash Data for Ko0logg and 6a sk Fatal Incapacitating Injury Non - Incapacitating Injury Possible Injury tProperty Damage © Prior to 2005 Year 0 2005 0 2006 0 2007 0 2008 Q 2009 0 2010 A 2011 Q 2012 ADT* Traffic Data s5th Speed, MPH** Location Description Year 25.4 2 W. 61st Street west of Kellogg 12012 Fall Recount 23.6 177 2012 Fall Count 23.2 2012 261 106 29.7 2 Kellogg Ave. north of W 61st Street 2012 Fall Count 28.5 2012 146 84 23.5 3 W. 61st Street east of Kellogg 2012 Fall Count 22.7 2061 2012 35.3 2001 293 171 24.7 4 Kellogg Ave. south of 61st Street 2012 Fall Count 25 437 2012 27 2003 * ADT is the Average Daily Traffic on a typical Monday- Friday ** 85th percentile spped is the speed at which 85% of vehicles measured are travelling at or below Crash Data NA•k Location Severity Year Property Damage - No Apparent Injury 2008 Property Damage - No Apparent Injury 2008 Property Damage - No Aooarent Iniury 2001 Fatal Incapacitating Injury Non - Incapacitating Injury Possible Injury tProperty Damage © Prior to 2005 Year 0 2005 0 2006 0 2007 0 2008 Q 2009 0 2010 A 2011 Q 2012 ADT* ADT Entering Intersection s5th Speed, MPH** 167 56 25.4 106 '12 23.6 177 68 23.2 261 106 29.7 275 82 28.5 146 84 23.5 125 77 22.7 2061 NA. 35.3 293 171 24.7 352 205 25 437 NA 27 Month Time Oct. 1605 Jan. 1505 Aua. 1800 .N 1N +E S 22 15 m m M » City of Edina 0 2 R ao Turning Counts Study - Field Sheet 11 ° Request No.: NA 24 -� Job No.: NA � ° Q w ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Location: Date: 1919 -12720 12119 -12/20 �— L 7 County: Town: enn. ina Recorder: I� U 9 Weather: ear erval (dd) (in Minutes) PEAK AM PERIOD 7:00- tart n o ume PM PERIOD 16:00- Start n o ume HOURS 10:00 07:00 10:00 U 19:00 16:00 19:00 AM Peak Hour: 41 26 1 15 LEG 1 Kellogg Avenue Quadrant Total 2 R T d L I U l p 3 Quadrant Total �I 2 1 23 1 1 1 0 22 15 m m M » U J 0 2 R ao 11 ° L 0 24 -� A ^. � ° Q w T —a 6 0 �— L 7 R —i 1 0 I� U 9 0 4 1 13 1 2 Quadrant Total 5 U L--] T f R �� 2 Quadrant Total Kellogg Avenue LEG 2 24 d I 19 43 PM Peak Hour: 109 25 1 1 84 LEG 1 Kellogg Avenue I Quadrant Total 4 R �I T d L I U I I 6 Quadrant Total —s 2 1 21 1 2 1 0 69 54 m 0, T » a— U . J 0 4 � R ao 29 L 2 24 -� A A A t7 w T —> 9 1 L 15 R 4 0 I� U 15 Quadrant Total 32 0 1 28 78 4 IL T 1 IR Kellogg Avenue LEG —2 26 i 1 110 136 5 1 Quadrant Total d 20 44 59TH ST 4;9tN /�J�4 �J ry a0 Docva Patti! GIEn ginae rm9Vnfraslruct urerStreatMTr ,WTWFSTUDIE51i01I1TraR _COntrol.rrud City ®f Edina Traffic Contr ®I SIN WIRMAW N W +E ss Engineering Dept January, 2013 f a O 0 P N C Wayne Houle From: Wayne Houle <WHoule @EdinaMN.gov> gent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 2:35 PM ro: 'Constance Fantin' Cc: Scott Neal; 'James Hovland'; Byron Theis; Paul Nelson Subject: RE: Denial of request for stop sign on Kellogg Av. & 61st Street Constance and Eric Fantin: I have spoken to Paul Nelson — Chair of the Transportation Commission regarding 61St Street and Kellogg Avenue. Since you were not properly notified that this issue was before the Transportation Commission we will be bringing this issue back to them next Thursday, February 21. The Commission meets at 6 PM in the Community Room (2nd Floor) of City Hall. Let me know if you can make this meeting and if would like to talk prior to this meeting. Thank you for your patience on this issue. �,'• ".;.;, Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering (/ 952- 826 -04431 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 WHoule @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Constance Fantin [ mailto:ccfantin@juno.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 8:14 PM To: jhoviand @krausehovland.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle; Byron Theis; Wayne Houle Subject: Denial of request for stop sign on Kellogg Av. & 61st Street Dear Mayor Hovland, City Council Members,'Mr. Houle and Mr. Theis, We understand that the City of Edina has denied (again) the request for stop signs on Kellogg Avenue at 61st Street, based on the November traffic study, and that the City is currently recommending that existing yield signs be removed on Kellogg, making Kellogg a through street and placing yield signs on 61st Street. We vehemently object to this proposal! This will not make the intersection safer but actually more dangerous as it simply shifts the burden of yielding to 61 st Street. More importantly, it will increase the speed of the traffic down Kellogg (all the people cutting through on Kellogg to avoid the congestion at Valleyview and Wooddale). We understand that the intersection doesn't "warrant" a stop sign because there are fewer than 6000 vehicles per day; the view is not restricted; and there have "ONLY" been two crashes in the last 12 months, which is one crash under the requisite 3 or more crashes in the intersection in a 12 -month period or 5 or more crashes in a 2 -year period. Two crashes in a few month period at an intersection that has already had numerous complaints should be sufficient. Do we have to wait until a third crash occurs, possibly a fatal crash? Earlier this week, a group of neighbors waiting at the school bus stop on Kellogg and 60th Street witnessed a speeding pickup truck going northbound on Kellogg Avenue. The pickup sped through the intersection on Kellogg at 61st Street, not slowing to yield to possible traffic, continued picking up speed all down Kellogg, and cruised through the stop sign on Kellogg at 60th Street. This pickup truck was inches away from a group of several adults and children. If we make Kellogg a through street (replacing the current yield sign with nothing) it will certainly increase this type of speeding. We completely disagree with Mr. Houle's contention that adding stop signs will make existing stop signs less effective. The vast majority of law- abiding citizens stop at stop signs. If Mr. Houle believes that stop signs are ineffective, why would yield signs be more effective? Yield signs are not properly understood in this country and are themselves completely ineffective because drivers apparently don't know what to do when faced with a yield sign. We have repeatedly witnessed drivers failing to yield in this intersection, and only because we are now ultra vigilant are we able to safely cross this intersection. (I have heard the same problems with the intersection at Oaklawn and 61st Street as well, due to the unobserved yield sign there.) As neighbors concerned for the safety of all, we beg you to reconsider the current proposal. Keeping the current situation is terrible, but making the changes you outline in the traffic study will make a bad situation worse. The science of traffic management doesn't fit every situation. You have the ability to rectify this by using your own good judgment and common sense to make this dangerous intersection safer. We are in the process of collecting signatures on a petition to add stop signs (in the place of the yield signs) on Kellogg Avenue at 61st Street. Please do the right thing and help us make our neighborhood safe. We would.like to schedule a time to meet with Mayor Hovland and any city engineers necessary to this discussion. Please call either Eric Fantin at 612- 245 -8008 or Constance Fantin at 612- 396 -5525 to find a suitable time. We are thoroughly tired of having to follow up on this dangerous situation and seek to put it to rest quickly, with stop signs being placed on Kellogg. Sincerely, Constance and Eric Fantin 6033 Kellogg Avenue South Constance Fantin ccfantin -juno.com ---- - - - - -= Original Message ---- - - - - -- From: Eric Fantin <strai h8 o, mail.com> To: Constance Fantin <ccfantin@juno.com> Subject: stop Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:04:28 -0600 Mr. Fantin and Mayor Hovland: r ?r The Traffic Safety Committee along with the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has reviewed the stop sign request at Kellogg Avenue and 61s<�Street West and it will be forwarded to the City Council for their review at their February 19 City Council Meeting. a?r I have attached the traffic safety committee report that went to the ETC.® The ETC is recommending that we move the yield signs from the current Kellogg Avenue location to 615t<t>Street West.® The reason for not proposing stop signs is that they do not meet Warrants to install.® 011 Warrants for traffic control devices, such as stop signs are set by the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which is based on the national Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.® These manuals have been developed to provide guidance to traffic professionals, so that we recommend the most safest installation of a traffic control device. When a traffic control device is installed where it does not meet warrants it then becomes a very insecure installation; meaning that some people will abide by the traffic control and some will not.® The latter are typically people that live close by or travel through the area on a regular basis and do not see traffic, which eventually `hey start to coast through or run the stop sign.® This creates a more dangerous situation.® r ?r The yield signs provides the assigned right -of -way at the intersection and will be placed on the lesser traveled street, therefore creating a safer intersection.® El Let me know if you have any questions regarding this recommendation. rir Thanks for your patience throughout this process. rI Ell MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM FEBRUARY 21, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Schweiger, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES -� REGULAR MEETING OF JAN. 17, 2013 The following correction was made: page 1, Traffic Safet - CommitteeReport of Jan. 2, 2013, last sentence 'Member Janovy said she appreciated the analysis a d �f`'at she was coWortable with the yield sign as ­ proposed in the report;' page 3, last sentence, ch e. 2,000 to $20,000:: %Motion was made by member � � f, LaForce and seconded by member Franzen to ap l � ;e the revised minutes 6f.Jan.17, 2013. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT Constance and Eric Fantin, 6033 Kellogg /�,Ge, ,commented ori'fhe� request to install stop signs at Kellogg & 61St. Ms. Fantin said the live four houses r g >,& 61St, ah'd,"currentl they y there is a yield sign on Kellogg while 61 is a thru street. She��sai the street � s one b ocJc'f gm Valley; V ew Road, the ice cream shoppe and Pamela Park and it is bus t >cars',�:w; alkers a. � ' VIA summer at the interse ,on: She said slje was in' their concerns of speedingMdut thru traffic to avo Wolf r.: and not respected, and rolling stopyt stop signs of yield signs,o �;�;'`clear signal ofwljere toaop Chair Nelson sa .1" ey are revisitii were two motor ve "icle.accidents accidents within one Discussion included the foil J, - witnessed two accidents last If of the neighborhood to address ley View & Wooddale intersection, yield sign ignored ,,pid they feel the best solution is stop signs instead staff did not talk with the neighborhood. He said there year but warrants are still not met for a stop sign (warrants are three • There are stop signs at all but a few intersections in the neighborhood; • Director Houle said there probably wasn't a lot of traffic and no interest in having stop signs at the few uncontrolled intersections; • From looking at data, the road to control is 61St; most existing stop signs probably do not meet warrants; bigger concern is when signs are placed haphazardly; complete basket weave; • Reluctant to find a response that overrides the data; real issue and concerns by neighbors; placing so many signs creates speeding, cut -thru; • Would City consider a traffic circle to minimize cut -thru? Director Houle said two were placed on W. 54th as part of the bike boulevard project and responses have been minimal; • Does staff hear from neighbors that drivers are rolling through stop signs? • A new request was received recently for a 4 -way stop sign at 60th & Kellogg. • Some issues are that Kellogg is one block from Wooddale; close to Pamela Park that generates traffic in the summer; and no sidewalks; • Conducting a traffic calming study was suggested; • What is the down -side if two stops signs that do not meet warrants are installed? • Counts indicate most vehicles are travelling northbound on Kellogg; replace yield signs with stop signs to complete the basket weave; • Can they do a pilot /test program? .Director Houle said they would need to identify the criteria they are testing because speeding is not an issue. He said if the ETC and City Council authorizes the stop sign he will support it but his recommendation is based on ggngineering standards that are in place. 10/01. • Concerned with a pilot program and cautioned against doingsone; • Thinking too hard on this issue; there are existing stop,eQns that do not meet warrants; these would complete the basket weave; • Consider turn restriction at Valley View if there read t thru traffic in the evenings but would also impact local traffic;; == • Will be talking about a stop sign at 61St an a lawn after it becomesAhe new cut thru; • Making more and more exceptions; woul 9ike to defer to engineering, recommendations but at the same time, need to address the concerns;r, r fir, g/jy Director Houle suggested meetj&with the neighboyhood to get their feedback on turn restriction; rt�i''rfflrh ,� he said when the intersection attyallelfView /Oaklawnf ;?nd was realigned, the feedback from residents was that traffic was beirig'rpush'eclpass their property and feedback will be the same from this neighborhood; • Mrs. Fantin said sheAVsthYngly in favor;of the stop signs because-they slow traffic and replaces a b, fir! idi rr r r r .r �'!' rf l.Plfll� %% dangerous inters fion; tliere�are only two int coons vvith yields signs and drivers do not know what to do at yie signs; dnversare used fos "top signs, simply switching would make speed faster; fir,, � �n the most amount of traff. is is o :Kellogg going ";northbound; do not want to hear about changes on 61St becauseritnrould be�comeworst, neighbo`rsrhave already asked about a 4 -way stop sign at 60tH & Kell Band also astoprsin'at 615f &'Oaklawri • Lotikifift at everytliin`g the orilVy,''eason for' or a=3top sign is that it was requested; there is no data to base'it':.gn; drivers go t�.r.'ough .. stbip'p` s all the time; cannot support a stop sign on Kellogg; • Liked tliet�raffic circle concept but donot know cost; r:. • Make decisioh:based on data; , and let City Council make the decision of exception; <, Motion was made by rrienber Bass and seconded by member LaForce to recommend to the City Council to reverse the ETCs previousrecommendation of moving the yield sign to 61st; and recommend they leave the intersection as is so that they can explore another traffic calming measure like a traffic circle. Discussion: • Would they explore traffic calming at this intersection only or all intersections? Director Houle said the neighborhood is about 5 -10 blocks with collector streets all around it and a park on one side and this summer they could study the area when there are activities at the park. The motion was amended to include adding a sign to the yield sign, in the interim, that `cross traffic does not stop' and to study the 8 -10 block area this summer. K Discussion: • Is adding a sign to a yield sign allowed? Staff will check to see if this is allowed. Aye: Bass, LaForce, lyer, Nelson, Braden Nay: Franzen, Janovy, Whited. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Committee Report of Feb. 6, 2013 Director Houle said the TSC did not meet because there was no business to discuss. Member LaForce asked if the reports are smaller because it is winter and Director Houle said yes, they do not generally get too many requests and they also cannot collect data in the winter. France Avenue Pedestrian Enhancement Project Update Director Houle said March 31 is the deadline for all agenci�e `npa :approval. He said Andy Plowman with WSB would give an update on the geometrics of the project and N(ichael Schroeder With LHB, would give an update on the landscaping. Mr. Plow fr'''t `. Plowman explained that the project include inte ..;section improvements;�;sidewalk on the eastside, narrowing of lanes and landscaping. Some of the features are: • Enhanced pedestrian crosswalks -6-bra. striped, th • Biscuit planters at the corner of int "er "sections for F and height range from 4 -7 inches a t� 5' ;�' will be plan ;eq.,v • Traffic signal improve. ents (pedestrian /bike phas o Southdale entrant /exi i ,narrow up - free -r ht fJr�. � , I. � �/.ra d �Y requested by So1A- i a e management; • All pedestrian rampslul be in compliance requirem,yye ts�))�; �' • Byerly's sitesis beg redeveloped and•th� on top oftl e> etai6iff, ,wall; th ie their site i lah:. ,. • Cost W$ RM, not includi#g,larn • Schedule is�,M„ar Ito complete r construction;'; raI'plastic in -laid in the asphalt); 1, i -4 strian safety as they wait to cross ( planters 2 k- `bll daylilies); and vide'b ;detection); Rated, and adding a crosswalk that was public accessibility guidelines (above ADA Tent is to have the sidewalk along their property cp> in the City's plan yet because Byerly's is still acquisitions; Mar 31 approved for bid; June -Sept. Urban Design '�1;,,:el l,`la,r,.. Y g Mr. Schroeder said the challef'`eao them was to overlay an urban design for the corridor on to improvements that are being made in a limited portion of the corridor. He said they focused on things related to pedestrian enhancements, directives to encourage movements at designated crossings and along the corridor and to find ways to work with the private sector to get pedestrians safely across parking lots and to the corridor. Mr. Schroeder said he wants to make sure everyone understands what urban design is. He said trees, biscuit planters, etc. is not urban design; these are things that they are putting in the corridor. He said urban design is about patterns, connections, reflections and an identity that people have with where they live and work. He cautions against spending money and not getting what they want. 3 Continuing, Mr. Schroeder said they have not had a chance to frame the larger opportunities because they have been focused on meeting the requirements of the money for this improvement. He said the struggle is that France Ave is different as you move along the corridor - buildings facing different directions, limited space in right -of -ways (ROW), Centennial Lakes lost its three block signature when the trees were removed from the mid -block so they could see to the front of stores, etc. He said if the idea is to have a signature for the corridor, they need to be bold and aggressive and he suggested expanding to include motorists and not just pedestrians because most users of the corridor will continue to be motorists. He said everything they are doing works to build on something bigger but they do not know what that is yet. 3long block signature — mid block trees were cut down so that they see to the front of the stores He proposed creating the France Avenue Working Group to deli `� uture patterns that build from the current project. He said members would be the ETC Planr)�Commission, Energy &Environmental Commission, City Council, and business and residential property ofte,rs. He said if they agree to the working group, he would create work plan for the E�� eview. He said further that the process would be similar to the one used for the Grandview Square Sm Area Study (on a ;Much smaller scale) where they W �f ;. agreed to a set of principles for the area. Meetingsfwould be scheduled in "JVJarch /April /May. Director Houle said if they agree to the working group, the mepr i g schedule would fit b;cause he is planning on bidding the landscaping portion separate in June /J A d, the antings would�b`e'd,one in 2014. After discussion, the consensus was to m9,V fofward with t(, , with Chair Nelson to arrange special be can do so (attendance is commissions, including t Updates None. Received m Chair Nelson said he, men on the draft policy. He sa thanked them for all their updates. group. Director Houle will work and whoever is available to attend ;chair of the other boards and nd past member Michael Thompson met several times and worked ion provided the content, while member Janovy did the editing. He Member Janovy said the city of Maple Grove, where Mr. Thompson works, adopted their Living Streets Policy this past January. She said in writing Edina's Living Streets Policy, since there was no funding' available, they pulled from the work that BARR and HR Green did, policies from the city of Maple Grove and Los Angeles County, and input from the workshop last year. She said they are looking for feedback and the next step is for assistant city manager Karen Kurt to-take the lead and circulate the draft policy to staff, boards and commissions for review and at some point there will be a public process. 4 Discussion included: • Adding a map to show where sidewalks are going in. Director Houle said he could do a concept map but did not have staff to do a detailed map at this time; or he could consult it out. • Adding a definition that explains why some parks were not included so as not to cause alarm. • Any street is an option for sidewalk even if not currently marked for sidewalk. • Member Janovy will edit and forward the draft policy to assistant city manager Kurt. Ms. Kurt is planning on attending the March ETC meeting. • Director Houle will work on the bike map as well as the functional classification map. Transportation Options Working Group Chair Nelson said the thought is to move forward with the Senior Traynsportation Option Study but he is not sure how to do this. Director Houle said they need to definatliey are asking for. Member Janovy asked if the recommendation was to bring Prism /VEAP into_Ed na,'and member Whited said yes. Member i� r,,i ,. Whited said she is considering applying for a Human Service' grant,' om Edina. Member Janovy asked if she is looking for a resolution of support and mere� .,. kited said yes Member Bass suggested a letter writing campaign to show support in combinatiorY�w h resolution from li'e:ETC. pp ._.,.,. Member Janovy said there are other issues that the gf�u could�uVork on sucif' how the infrastructure is serving people to help address other tra s ortation ( - `isnot just seniors and those with disabilities. Member Bass suggested exploring mob,b" her modes a same senior folks, e.g. in their scooter or wheelchair. Member Whited said she is vSfo�kifig jdn, initiative th Ms: Melton that may be a good fit. Member Whited will write a recommendatrd -6; 5 ",. ;Q,I a. Website Feedback Member LaForce said the f<00911 1�/ for information o, sidewalks,4 handout. Enei VeerrinNspeciali began wox, on some ofs;heir reco make it ea for. residents to fiNd; the front page addra�nk to the Trans' b. ETC Communication Comi nsportatfon website from the perspective of a resident looking !r-, bike trail%,etc. and they consolidated their responses in the ;onfsPid she;-,reviewed the recommendations and have already endations ;;Member LaForce said their recommendation is to irmation that they are looking for, e.g. under For Residents on the e Recommendations Member LaForce said t b'.j talked a'bo'ut what they should do — provide text, content, create communication pieces, et"-' '- d the" realized their charge is to make recommendations because there is a professional communicat s a- is . He said their recommendation is what staff should be working on and the big topics now are France Ave, Safe Routes to Schools, and Living Streets. He said the communication plan should "make it easy to find answers to why, who, when, and finding better and effective ways to communicate messages on things like the purpose of the ROW, multi -modal approach, etc. Member LaForce said if these are things that the ETC supports the recommendation would be passed on to staff and the City Council. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member lyer that the ETC adopts the Communications Committee Recommendations dated Feb. 21, 2013, and forward it to the City Council. Chair Nelson asked what the committee will do moving forward and member LaForce said primarily provide reaction or feedback to staff. . All voted aye. Motion carried. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues Director Houle said there was an informative presentation on Tuesday night at the City Council meeting on airport noise and he recommended that the ETC watch the video Member Janovy said there were two letters about the francchis ees and it seems there is a high level of misunderstanding of how this was done. She said she recalle tie City Manager saying that Edina is one of the few cities that was not charging a franchise fee and Ea s f e' is lower than other cities. She asked if they could get this information. B. Development Projects Update and Airport No Director Houle said Mr. Teague will be updatingth CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER C6 -WMENI a /MMI Member Whited asked about Xerxes Aveoi)elhe driving lane is no longer visible. Director Houle! e 'lCob _i Member Whited said the . e `Council released; be able to write a rant�;�rector Ho y le;;said it is g ��� r because it is expensive to p�ay,a consultant to wi 11h y worth the time and expense. •`' Update — See memo'•ff;o Cary Teague Mpn development prdjL3g s from now on. v., .rfr� )wn'w ere the striping between the parking and epin C640 will be restriping the area this spring. that 'would fit with what they do but she would not .o have a:p on in place when applying for a grant ($20- $30,000). He said grants of $1M and up is Member Bds's``saitl as tle`project maager for doaovyn, trliey hosted a telephone townhall meetings last month for,the.cities of Bloomington, E'di" a ,and Richfield and Edina's call was on Jan. 15. She said it was an opportunity for >the Mayor to talkwith residents about a vision for a community that supports healthy choices including „tl%ings like access tq healthy foods and walkable /bikeable changes. She said the call went out to 9,600 register -d” land lines a cl.2,600 listened to portions of the call and some for the full 40 minutes. There were 30guestions posed by residents and the Mayor answered 10. She said majority of the rff questions had to do with`sa,fety anlfgetting around by walking /biking; and many were women bikers. A poll was taken and from fou`Foptlons, most said they would get involved with walkable / bikeable neighborhood (39 %). She said tl "is is good indication for broad support of multi -modal transportation and the work that the ETC is doing. Member Bass said the Blue Cross support to do.town is coming to a close at the end of March and on Mar. 16 they are having a Champion Summit at the Works in Bloomington from 10 -2:30 p.m. and all are invited to attend. Member lyer said he and Bill Sierks wrote a couple grants that were approved for the City. He said Mr. Sierks identified the opportunities ahead of time so they could react. I Member Janovy noted that there was a letter to the City Council regarding heavy trucks wreaking the streets and she said it sounds like an educational opportunity. Director Houle said staff is working on a memo to City Council to address this in a general manner. He said garbage trucks are more damaging to the roadway than a typical home reconstruction project. Additional comments were: • Having an approach to the traffic concerns that will generate at Hello Pizza; . . • Sunken pavement at Inglewood & Grimes where the City did work last year; • Green bike paint wearing off (Director Houle said this is not uncommon —they are repainted every year);' • A bill was introduced to remove prohibition against talking about the Dan Patch corridor; consensus is that the ETC will follow this bill; A& • Federal money available through MNDOT for places thatf `'a've accidents and she suggested the area at Crosstown and France.` '. Chair Nelson said over the last few days, he assisted t•; eyCity Council Gvithinterviews for new boards and commission members. He said there were at le 3 -4 ranked it as their priority. He said it was refs comments were: • Reminder to sign up for the An 11, 5:00 p.m. and the 34th Ann STAFF COMMENTS fI A. Southdale Area Trans _ o taf 66 Director Houle said he i9166king for LaForce expressed an interest:;,Direc •:r Yr date. .::.. B. Nine M, 11OCreek Regi6ti Director Hoy &said the easterlj funding for thewesterly half fo constructed at the'same time. C. Wooddale AdvisoryBike Lan Director Houle said he met,, ith,' fpplicants and 10 -4, were interested in the ETC and h ngyto see all the people "'Wi nting to help. Additional F •F1�Y r...Y I' Meeting o „f oar and Commissions at Braemar, Mar. ,r jtecognitioTi- ception at Braemar, Apr 30, 5:00 p.m. iember`sto -Help with writing the scope for this study. Member W' oule will seh an email invitation as they get closer to the meeting i r y e "r FIrail received funding for 2015; they continue to work on is to et fundin for both halves so that the can be g g Y Clark and MNDOT. He said MNDOT is reluctant to make changes because the bike lanes are ex'j�e dental and they would not be able to evaluate it if changes are made. He said the parking lane is an issue and the suggestion is to install popsicle cones to help with delineation. Member Janovy said she is concerned how people will respond and how the road will look. She said they need to go forward in a way that restores the iconic roadway. She said problems will exist as long as the parking lane is in place. Member lyer asked what happens if the bike lanes were removed and Director Houle said the City would probably lose the grant money. Adding bump -outs were considered but the bid came in at $260,000 said Director Houle. Member Janovy said the City Council wanted a work session and asked if it was scheduled. Director Houle said he was not aware of this. 7 D. Construction Management Plan Update Director Houle said the City Council is holding a work session on Mar 5, 5 p.m. to discuss the Construction Management plan. He said last year there were 100 teardowns. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION ... ; _.. COMMISSION:ATTENDANCE = 2013' . j Work #of Attendance NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S''QjxN D Session Mtgs, Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 % ,;;;, 2', Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1,:' Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2016 1 1 _ I er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 2 - ° 5.100 /0 Janov , Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 2' LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 !! ;, < ., 2 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2010._ 1 1 % y,_ `t ,. 2, . 1000i Schwei er, Steven s� err X�/. �,trt;; Fj >. :1:, 1 . /;i. ' �+ r- ::%f., / 2 ° 100 /0 Sierks, Caroline Alf t, 1 ;•,, OF Thompson, Michael 2/1_2U�� 3 1 7, Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 t °,. 1 1000/V 8 2. Wayne Houle From: Constance Fantin < ccfantin @juno.com> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 8:50 PM To: jhovland @krausehovland.com; jonibennett12 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonann1 @gmail.com; Wayne Houle; pnelson @shawlundquist.com; Scott Neal; Byron Theis Cc: 6strings @usfamily.net; angieandresen @comcast.net; tanya.m.belanger @gmail.com; akblatnik @yahoo.com; Suzanne @blueskyschool.org; jenneabotts @gmail.com; sarah_ @yahoo.com; carrie_brenner @yahoo.com; nathanjbrown @msn.com; @bradfordmn crburnham @aol.com; gogetemtigers comcast.net; nathan3e @gmail.com; rachmed72 @aol.com; kofoley @gmail.com; haugen.susan @gmail.com; meganmaree15 @gmail.com; e.b.j @telia.com; kkafala @yahoo.com; mitiek @yahoo.com; skalnins @earthlink.net; zura0003 @umn.edu; Iand0133 @umn.edu; mhlarsen @usfamily.net; annika.g.liden @gmail.com; judy @martydirect.com; mcmahonjulie4 @gmail.com; saetbyul @gmail.com; jpool1 @live.com; alliereilly @gmail.com; sharon.hammond @hotmail.com; scheererj @comcast.net; sheiladshane @hotmail.com; kristin.skunberg @ earthlink.net; tiasmythe @gmail.com; anne.spaulding @gmail.com; kristen.stiers @target.com; ashleyswanda @gmail.com; kristinetownsend @msn.com; ftrice_1 @ msn.com; mkwerner @engunl.com; elleziegler @yahoo.com; stephanie.b.nelson @hotmail.com; stephnordin @gmail.com; ccfantin @juno.com; chelacsamana @hotmail.com; suzy1234 @hotmail.com; renediaz7 @ comcast.net; andreaneuger @yahoo.com; andrea @humphreymusic.net; landelle @earthlink.net; lon cram @yahoo.com; dmerrigan @comcast.net; email @travelinggirl.com; bertons @me.com; cbbenson @msn.com; abbyharrell @comcast.net; jonhpope @hotmail.com; pope 1973 @live.com; zemkecol @yahoo.com; kari_malek @yahoo.com; julie.n.weliman @ gmail.com; kituijanet @yahoo.com; andrea_delrue @yahoo.ca; crowleyporter @gmail.com; erica.mayborne @gmail.com; paulalibbey @hotmail.com; nwilmot @live.com; tonya @wilhoit.org; katereiser @yahoo.com; amanda_kreider @hotmail.com; peng621 @comcast.net; gtclinafelter @gmail.com; trailerfamily @gmail.com; acavell @q.com Subject: Request for stop sign on Kellogg Av. & 61 st Street Dear Mayor Hovland, Wayne, Paul, Byron, City Council Members, We attended the Transportation Commission meeting on February 21 st and met with Director of Engineering, Wayne Houle, and Chair of Transportation Commission, Paul Nelson before the meeting. We were there from 5:30 until 7:00 p.m. and I can only say that there was a lot of discussion without great results. The one thing we accomplished was to help the Transportation Commission understand that we and other neighbors vehemently oppose their previous recommendation to move the existing yield signs from Kellogg to 61 st Street. This is good progress. The newest recommendation, however, is not to replace the yield signs with stop signs (which is what our neighborhood' has been requesting for years, as I understand from an elderly neighbor). We still believe that stop signs are the most effective and cost - efficient resolution to the dual problem of cut - through traffic speeding northbound on Kellogg and the dangerous, accident -prone intersection at Kellogg and 61 st Street. The Traffic Commission's new recommendation is to add "Cross traffic does not stop" signs to the existing yield signs on Kellogg. They also recommend the entire 8 -block area be studied and even would consider installing a traffic circle (roundabout) in the intersection at 61st and Kellogg. It seems that every conceivable option is being considered EXCEPT the stop signs which our neighborhood has requested. We do plan to attend the March 19 City Council meeting and urge our neighbors to attend as well, but we find As entire process extremely laborious and inefficient. We simply cannot understand why there is so much opposition to replacing yield signs with stop signs in this one intersection. Stop signs send an unambiguous signal to all drivers that they must stop and they do not have the right of way. In fact, during the meeting, we received a map of the entire Pamela Park neighborhood and within that 8 -block area, there are only two intersections with yield signs instead of stop signs: 61 st and Kellogg, and 61 st and Oaklawn. (We have heard from neighbors that they would like stop signs at the Oaklawn intersection as well, but we are only tackling the Kellogg intersection currently.) According to the City Engineer, many of the stop signs in Edina do not meet the "warrants" but were installed based on neighborhood concerns. We find it ludicrous that the City would take such a firm stance on only installing stop signs when officially "warranted" now, ignoring the fact that two accidents occurred last summer, and choose this moment to disregard neighborhood concerns. Several Transportation Commission members seemed ready and willing to authorize and recommend the stop signs based on the repeated pleas from our neighborhood. A couple members want to strictly observe statistics, despite neighbor complaints and requests. One member appeared determined to argue anything for the sake of NOT placing stop signs in this intersection. This member's contention, that drivers do not completely stop at stop signs, thus we shouldn't add more stop signs, is absurd. We would greatly prefer a stop sign, even if drivers only slow to a "rolling stop" instead of a full legal stop, rather than the way drivers currently plow through the intersection, completely ignoring the yield signs. This member suggested that perhaps we need a campaign to educate the American driver on the meaning of yield signs. We would whole - heartedly endorse this long -term plan, but only AFTER installing the needed stop signs in our neighborhood. We were surprised to see how quickly the entire Transportation Commission discussion turned from our neighborhood request for stop signs, to no longer considering stop signs as an option, and to only looking at other less desirable, and often more costly alternatives. We are certainly willing to see if the "Cross traffic does not stop" signs would help, but we still believe the simplest, clearest, and most effective solution to our neighborhood's traffic issues could be solved by replacing these two yield signs with stop signs. Mayor Hovland, we greatly appreciate your time and interest in our neighborhood and would welcome any intervention you could provide on behalf of common sense. Thank you all for your time. We sincerely hope that you will reconsider the Pamela Park neighborhood's request for stop signs. Best regards, Constance and Eric Fantin 6033 Kellogg Av. S. Constance Fantin ccfantin @juno.com ---- - - - - -- Original Message ---- - - - - -- From: James Hovland <jhovland @krausehovland.com> To: Constance Fantin <ccfantin @juno.com> Subject: Re: Denial of request for stop sign on Kellogg Av. & 61st Street Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:54:10 -0600 Constance, let me know how it goes. I am very interested in this issue. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - - - -- Reply message - - - -- ,rom: "Constance Fantin" < ccfantin @juno.com> .'o: "ccfantin @juno.com" < ccfantin @juno.com> Cc: "WHoule @EdinaMN.gov" <WHoule @EdinaMN.gov >, "sneal@EdinaMN.gov" <sneal@EdinaMN.gov >, "James Hovland" < jhovland @krausehovland.com >, "BTheis @EdinaMN.gov" <BTheis @EdinaMN.gov >, "pnelson @shawlundquist.com" < pnelson @shawlundquist.com> Subject: Denial of request for stop sign on Kellogg Av. & 61 st Street Date: Wed, Feb 20, 2013 7:24 pm Hello Wayne, We are still planning to attend the Traffic Commission meeting tomorrow, Thursday, Feb. 21 at 6 p.m. Are you able to meet with us beforehand at 5:30 or should we just come for the 6:00 meeting? We'll look forward to meeting you tomorrow. Best regards, Constance Fantin Constance Fantin ccfantin @juno.com ---- - - - - -- Original Message ---- - - - - -- From: "Constance Fantin" < ccfantin @juno.com> To: WHoule @EdinaMN.gov Cc: sneal @EdinaMN.gov, jhovland @krausehovland.com, BTheis @EdinaMN.gov, pnelson @shawlundquist.com Subject: RE: Denial of request for stop sign on Kellogg Av. & 61st Street Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:03:00 GMT Hello Wayne, Thank you for following up on our recent email. We would appreciate the opportunity to talk with the Traffic Commission about our neighborhood's request for stop signs on Kellogg Avenue at 61 st Street. We will definitely plan to attend the meeting on Feb. 21 at 6 p.m. and would welcome the opportunity to talk with you beforehand. Would you recommend we arrive early that day - perhaps at 5:30 - or would you prefer we plan a . time to stop by your office or even to have a conference call? We've marked our calendar to attend the Traffic Commission meeting on Feb. 21 at 6 pm and will wait to hear from you about the best time to talk before the meeting. We'll look forward to hearing from you soon and meeting you on the 21 st. Best regards, Constance and Eric Fantin Constance Fantin ccfantin @juno.com Please note: message attached From: Wayne Houle <WHoule @EdinaMN.gov> To: 'Constance Fantin' <ccfantin @juno.com> Cc: Scott Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov >,.'James Hovland' <jhovland @krausehovland.com >, Byron Theis <BTheis @EdinaMN.gov >, Paul Nelson <pnelson @shawlundquist.com> Subject: RE: Denial of request for stop sign on Kellogg Av. & 61 st Street Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:35:00 +0000 llrj,. o e In To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. E. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: March 19, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -29 Requesting Variance From Standards for State Aid Operation — Wooddale Avenue Action Requested: Review and approve the attached resolution to add a centerline stripe to Wooddale Avenue. Information / Background: At the March 5 City Council meeting, the Council requested that staff prepare a resolution to request a variance to place a centerline along Wooddale Avenue from West 50th Street to Valley View Road. As you will recall Wooddale Avenue was restriped last fall with advisory bike lanes and a north bound parking lane as part of the federally funded bike boulevard project. The advisory bike lanes were part of a request for permission to experiment from Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) with the understanding that the work would stay in place for 2 -years to determine the effectiveness of the striping. The advisory bike lanes were installed to address space constraints as Wooddale Avenue is not wide enough to accommodate designated bike lanes, a parking lane, and two travel lanes. The Transit for Liveable Communities did not feel that signage alone would sufficiently address the bicyclists' needs and felt that additional guidance would be required to make the designated corridor suitable for the average bicycle rider. The theory of an advisory bike lane is to teach both bicyclists and motorists, such that bicyclists learn the correct positioning on the roadway and motorists learn about the cyclists' right to occupy a narrow lane and how to pass bicyclists legally. A two year evaluation period is required as part of the request for permission to experiment. Some of the variables to be studied include total number of cyclists (before and after), number of cyclists riding on the sidewalks, number of cyclists riding against traffic, volume of motorists, crash data, position of vehicles and cyclists in their lanes, and a after study survey of drivers and bicyclists to determine recognition, comprehension and effectiveness, see attached sheet for current data. The study can be terminated at any time if the there is significant safety concerns that are directly or indirectly attributable to the experimentation. The public has reacted very negatively to the advisory bike lanes. Some of the issues that have been raised is how to drive a roadway that is marked this way, what to do when you meet an oncoming vehicle, what to do when there is a bicyclists in the bike lane area, why doesn't the bicyclists use the parking lane, etc. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 On February IS, staff met with the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid and Federal Aid, Transit for Liveable Communities, and Alliant Engineering to discuss the advisory bike lanes along Wooddale Avenue. Options identified by this group include: • Remove parking lane and restripe with dedicated bike lanes. • Sign the parking lane "No Driving in Parking Lane ". • Provide more verticalness along parking lane by either installing bump -outs along the roadway or with a delineator style traffic control device. • More discussion is needed regarding funding if the roadway is modified from the approved plans. The consensus of the group was to continue with the evaluation period so that future requests could be addressed appropriately by the FHWA and / or the FHWA would include this type of striping in future standards. The group discouraged painting a centerline along Wooddale Ave or even replacing the temporary centerline tabs that were installed last fall, since this would affect the evaluation of the project. A variance request from Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) State Aid along with a federal design exception will be required. The MNDOT staff person that I contacted did not know the exact process, since this project was approved and has been constructed; the MNDOT staff that will address this issue are unavailable until the week of March 18. The earliest that this issue could be addressed by the variance committee is in June. Staff recommends that we go forward with the variance request to see what the response will be and to also obtain an answer from MNDOT on the funding of the project. Attachments: Traffic Data — Volumes and Speed Crash Data Pedestrian and Bicycle Observation Data G: \PW\CENTwaL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \CONTRACTS\2012 \ENG 12 -6 Bike Blvd (TLQ\FINAL DESIGN\State Aid Variance Request \Item VIII. E. Resolution No. 2013 -29 Requesting Variance From Standard for State Aid Operation - Wooddale Avenue docx RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -29 REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM STANDARDS FOR STATE AID OPERATIONS WOODDALE AVENUE — WEST 50TH STREET TO VALLEY VIEW ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Edina Engineer is. hereby authorized to request a variance from the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, pursuant to Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations 8820.330 and 8820.9936, adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapters 161 and 162, as they apply to the addition of a centerline stripe along Wooddale Avenue from West 50th Street to Valley View Road, State Aid Route No. 120- 091 -002, located in Edina, Minnesota and Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the City has placed advisory bike lanes and has analyzed this section of roadway and feels that a centerline will better differentiate the vehicle travel lanes; and WHEREAS, the variance is requested to allow placement of a dashed centerline stripe along Wooddale Avenue from West 50th Street to Valley View Road, which the advisory bike lane marking would make the remaining portion of the travel lane substandard as contained in the geometric and design standards required by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations 8820.9936; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby indemnifies, saves and holds harmless the State, its agents and employees of and from claims, demands, actions, or causes of action arising out of, or by reason of the granting of the variance. The Council further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense, any action of proceeding begun for asserting any claim of whatever character arising out of, or by any reason of the granting of the variance. Dated: March 19, 2013. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 19, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk GAPMENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS%CONTRACTS%20121ENG 12-6. Bike Blvd (TLC) \FINAL DESIGN1Stale Aid Variance Request \Res. No. 2013 -29 Requesting MSAAS Variance.doc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: March 19, 2013 To: City Council From: Wayne Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Current Wooddale Avenue Traffic Data MEMO Attached is the traffic data for Wooddale Avenue from 2005 to 2012 (after installation of Advisor Bike Lanes). Additional data will be collected throughout the two year evaluation period for the advisory bike lanes. A summary of the traffic data for Wooddale Avenue is: Location Year Average Daily Traffic 85% Speed South of Wooddale Ln 2012 5497 33.4 2009 5700 30.4 South of 59th Street W 2012 2758 33.7 2011 3371 34.2 Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 2012 Wooddale Avenue Traffic Data 0 1 i_ � )j N W+E S Engineering Dept November, 2012 Vocation Description Year ADT'� ADT Over 25 MPH ADT Over 30 MPH* 85th Percentile Speed NB SB NB SB NB 56 1 Wooddale south of 50th Street 2009 5700 2134 1881 554 547 30.5 30.4 2005 5706 NA NA NA NA NA NA NB SB NB SB NB SB 2 Wooddale south of Wooddale Lane 2012•• 5497 2175 2430 1093 1356 32.9 33.4 NB NB NB NB NB NB 3 Wooddale south of 54th Street 2009 2005 4578 4453 2059 NA 1994 NA 1145 NA 776 NA 32 NA 33.5 NA NB SB NB SB NB SB 4 Wooddale south of 59th Street 2012••• 2758 1042 1462 573 796 33.7 33.4 2011 3371 1446 1489 853 960 33.7 34.2 2005 3108 NA NA NA NA NA NA NB SB NB SB NB SB 5 Wooddale north of Valley View Road 2009 3281 226 457 14 27 26.2 24.7 2005 3501 NA NA NA NA NA NA .-.— . Inc r Vmgc �ouy I ialjIc on a typical Ivlunuay- rrlaay ** 85 percentile speed is the speed at which 85% of vehicles measured area travelling at or below * ** Counts taken after Advisory Bike Lane installation Date Modified: 11/15/12. - By Byron Theis G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure\Streets \Traffic \TRAFF STUDIES \2012 \Wooddale.xlsx UIrT•1 OF ■rI�.A: MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com 0 e 0 Date: March 19, 2013 'moo .iy To: City Council From: Wayne Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Current Wooddale Avenue Crash Data Attached is the crash data for Wooddale Avenue. This is information that the City of Edina has access to. There might be crashes that have not been called into the police department or crashes that officers have responded to but did not file a report. Staff continues to monitor the crash data for this roadway. Also attached is a memo from our Police Chief that summarizes the four accidents that occurred after the advisory bike lanes were installed and prior to November 12 memo. There was a rear -end accident that occurred on Wooddale Avenue at West 50th Street on December 11. The apparent cause of that accident was inattentiveness. A summary per year of the crash data for Wooddale Avenue is: Year Crashes 2013 0 2012 (after advisory bike lanes) 5 2012 (prior to advisory bike lanes) 1 1 2011 7 2010 9 2009 3 2008 5 2007 6 Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 ( 2001 -2010 Crash Report for Wooddale Avenue z ` crock - ------------ i ---- IL Oarve Lake Pame f 0 9�\,ld• W E !� S Engineering Dept November, 2012 Document Path: G: lEngineeringllnfrastructurelStreelslTra tiickGrashes120121wooddale Crashes.mxd I 2001 -2010 Crash Data for Wooddale Avenue Location Total Severity Date Time # Street X- Street Qtv F Description Wooddale Avenue West 50th Street 2 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 12/20/2008 1045 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 1/14/2007 1810 2 Wooddale Avenue NA 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 2/2512009 1145 3 Wooddale Avenue Wooddale Lane 1 1 Injury: Possible Injury 9/6/2007 1450 4 Wooddale Avenue Wooddale Glen 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 11/10/2008 836 6 Wooddale Avenue NA 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 5131/2007 2010 6 Wooddale Avenue West 52nd Street 2 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 1/12/2005 811 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 4/1312001 100 7 Wooddale Avenue West 54th Street 6 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 2/12/2008 1825 2 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 2/15/2006 1050 2 inju ry: Non -incapacitating Injury 9/27/2006 1645 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 1/1312002 2400 8 Wooddale Avenue Lexington Street 2 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Inury 6/4/2010 1433 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Inury 211612007 1515 9 Wooddale Avenue West 56th Street 4 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 10/21/2010 1505 1 Injury: Possible Injury 911412007 1728 1 1 Injury: Possible Injury 6/21/2005 1535 1 1 Injury: Possible Injury 318/2001 1700 10 Wooddale Avenue Wooddiand Road 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 1213012005 1240 11 Wooddale Avenue West 68th Street 3 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 2125/2010 2318 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 2/1912009 1239 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 112012001 1200 -12 Wooddale Avenue West 59th Street 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 6/2712009 2214 13 Wooddale Avenue NA 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 3116/2010 1501 14 Wooddale Avenue West 60th Street 2 1 Injury: Non-incapacitating Injury 121212008 946 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 3/912002 1300 16 Wooddale Avenue West 61st Street 1 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 1012312008 1605 16 Wooddale Avenue `Dailey View Road 2 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 7/13/2007 1741 1 Property Damage: No Apparent Injury 5129/2004 945 Total Crashes: 31 Dato Modiflcd: 1121/2012 By: BT G: 1En0ineerinOVnf raslructure% Slreels \TrafficlCrashes120121Crash Dala_Wooddate.xlsx City Hall a 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 Phone 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 a www.CityofEdina.com (Date: November 12, 2012 To: Scott Neal, City Manager & Wayne Houle, City Engineer From: Jeff Long, Chief of Police Re: Car Accidents on Wooddale WEEpwc) At your request, I have researched the number of accidents on /near Wooddale Avenue since the advisory bike lanes were added. There have been four accidents, they are as follows: I ) September 27' at 2:36 PM, Edina case #12002364. This occurred northbound on Wooddale about 300 feet south of W.50ih Street. The driver was not familiar with the new lanes, was avoiding on- coming traffic and hit a parked car. (See Attached Report) 2) October 2 "d at 3:50 PM, Edina case #12002411. This occurred on Valley View road at Wooddale Ave. A vehicle had come to a complete stop at the stop sign. The driver of the second vehicle was looking in his rear view mirror as he was concerned about bikes in the area because of the new bike lanes. He did not see the stopped vehicle at the stop sign and "rear- ended" it. (See Attached Report) 3) October 20`h at 3:19 PM, Edina event #2012- 64357. This occurred WB 50' Street at Wooddale Ave. This had nothing to do with the bike lanes. A driver had her foot slip off the brake while at the stop light and her vehicle struck the vehicle ahead of it. (No report was taken due to minimal damage) 4) October 24`h at 7:43 AM, Edina case #12002593. This occurred southbound on Wooddale Ave. at Wooddale Glen. The first vehicle had come to a stop for a school bus stop arm. The driver of the second vehicle was looking at her dashboard in an attempt to locate the defrost button. She did not notice the first vehicle was stopped and "rear- ended" it. (See Attached report). An aside, I checked the number of citywide bicyclist crashes with the time frame of 10/31/11 — 10/31/12. Throughout the city we had 14 accidents involving bicycles. Eight of those accidents included injuries, the other six did not. - - .._- .._...._._ - - -- City nF Frlinn o dR01 WP.,;t 50th Straat o Frlinn MN 5500 I k Accident Report Page 1 of 1 wcv.u,ar.7L -" wfRDFD' ! d 6r✓ 8 _ _ 12002411 1� g gr.Lliogai wBPRaP vExglEa HEED wnlREp aua LlFNm' Dqe pAKue VTa¢ l ` N' 62 60 fb0 'Y 10 2 2012 1550 �' Rwms aT IgY1EN10l6EAm67A6 RU.Id RWDNAYDwECOC4 IR Big pN B BFr Ha �w °F � pR G 05 Valle View Rd. a 8w �• �-- COiI HO eREUTA REFHIENCEroort' ROVIeSY9 ROVfHAaTNiEOCOPPLWJCORPE.Ynme 27 �,w Edina. { _ • 05 Wooddale Ave. V7 , :6VdH M.l I POSIROx dYPERIXFTlSe M1uBW.1 cwt"" DLETATUS Po [SIfYER LICFRi611W2FA•} • aLee CIASa maunn P,y�Gja111 Z W =TM2 IYNEVMfiT. OLDIP.USTI amw Beml • R.WH V=T. DCO AASn m1H016EiM fAOIDftT W� s9 R A00.Yia mroLTx RFSDOOf w ARK Gt swup CITY 6TN&W PNYRI us MUMENne MKV ig C ECf � pAfgEOP� µPa MOW ® E%E� Wlo �M�W f. ® fi® IW aiV SYD =IL IYPH ORW Type 70 ^ ►�97RkI5PpM AWMARCHLFJMCH NAixJxBFA NdL�1 7YPH aRq l'rPe 101geP 7RNliP00.i w&nIHCHBETMCH 13"M RIAIxWd[n go I �� aniPRxLrle ~fue� w.7PRluue tote S p'pDPess roA7a �* AnpREaL Ta� ® P rfHUSE ara7e,zw PYllwp emsTa+• ewelo pslfer vExu+e We= rm L7LDEL TFM CO(m 4MIM Limo WLO2� C'ma Sp0 as 606 so DHOSEV mug E7AF0 LENlREO 6C�Q'�[AL¢CP6L�la loulw YDtiiWYl L+sn PUTE/ + 67REa YCNIiEp WD:CBpif�tcll+6 vaa vasrR.LaN , p1maE1r ® WNUM ® ® YISYIWlCfi PoIIC/hVLOER 4�WAYCH part PoilL7AVVafl1 CJJt00aD :TYPE I1K 441T xA4 Y /NYE[I WSPECHONS PiSP 8A0GEa IFACCIDENT INVOLVED ACOMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE, SCHOOL BUS, OR HEAD START BUS nN/Fp IIAELUf wq O60Y TM 7 ? REMEMSERTO NOTLFYTHE STATE PATROL(requllvd underUS J69.783 and 169AS111). "f CODLSnpLLVne68MllTiFR1 •YOrOA WRNERNALI@ D07RMJHFR COLD' JAON .vODCEerdM1HEnx.LCTDRGVWEItrwda G"lawLA PA,SFNOEr19NpD+ESaE9 Ylar nu mmCPOYi+l1 W1 TYPE YSE mew "" Cam TCxCOP 7RAMM" •. Q-M NLBSEI{MCH flYNIBR/8F1{ lie ? QORIet• QADB MOSFRNCH RYRNMMFA ' ? . QpIHFfl JE. ❑m JVdaaPAVICe nW IALVBEfl 7. I.3—M - —L OMilEA MOTTpR OMN6EDPAOPERIT, WDOEafAP00NOi0l AYD[ p PROPFRiYNiDS21 YE1101V7AONUWFTgaj D4VAGEDPROPERIY /YR10Y /TNLiMMEA ACC7YP .+• xSPmTnL' pMCa 03 aC010119 .._ ........ ... _. . ... ........_._............... ............ .... .._ .f 2 was al. ed In traffic due to high volume+ 03 _Unit and stop a�ign: Driver ' o1 -wale i "'s�aEeaE'fia or newly added bikeilanes, Driver of unit I etated••bhat he •- was••�ooking••ia••hie••seax view- -•• - -- Dow DM 01 Lin! 01 ONP1°Pea �Ra N7 I mirror and did not'see that unit 2 was stopped. 04 TYPE G'LYL " q1i' it'' i•' Y€ d' Y' tlridezl" unY' t" 2: `Neither'•drivar'-• °••- '• °�-.., � co lained of injury at the scene. 98 3 0 iwof fnwwa Y raw :ynx u _...... „ . _........._.... _,....... 01. WFATREA7 OB r _.. ..._.. YOM apaMV' 01 01 �• L .......................................... .. ........ ...._................ _ Pi T� ..... ......... ......... .... ... . . .... ..... ......... ... .. -.... r.._... I AD MOTI ........... OMRAV 01 01 OFfILERMIDClIM'ENa ] eiD0e2 _: _ _ AOrhCY ..PATRDLDTATgH D HWEPNAOL J9 LOLL Sergeant Nathan Mendel 117 lEdina PD pWFROP pWWn https:// www, dvslesupport .orgldvsinfolaccidentrecords 200811noludes LEIPrintReportIndi... 10/6/2012 Accident Report Page 1 of 1. I fvA s T Fall xanx II �AVPw ' P,,,fRfIP fTYj'fa- R1alEp *MM"EO -9uq. ' ' , "".5 °y7ed �.w. 7m+E.• & ' T 62 t1D ' RovmrxmEAf Ro1nelNVSwaasl €f.IWle ' . , RoAOVwraRFCmJ N• rt 11 a a QYmmasclall ai n_ ®Fr �Y gv°Pf�I' ¢ iF lA Wooddale Ave. 8rr -�yf O m ritw a E IA PFPEnElrcVFW .... Povlasra 39 rwuES/:ernFe ;caw UM. rPAnmE Y7oo.4d$lg Glen 27 ;� Edina _ Al.— a.: f m. •�' at .axl �ls ;'•ai:f:: -! . •satrb �, =•- .,.- •z. rovrnrr WNEIt11II.Y/OflMflw.) $D{fe $Ty9 � row. �- F+ +•�, r... d .. i ry 3 ��ortvur Rrnruf - 6wE cTLS+. ® j ��fmj 1 iuve(fOtsr uiaaf4FAST1 EV6Hm lulu rvuT.FamIRaAST ' oJlTe0l Aaam rE�cfgx? 4 � � NxY1EG9 07 1N AFa MEP IrAi/.'FR A[NlFEji — _ IMYI0.1Nr P��1 PNFECE GR6N16.1P .. _. _. GIY,4T:TRaP � � �4t .Q'dR jR i:lf- _ _. 9ff'EMf Flf6 FEAT` NRGG' LER - PII6 f y( ® 'i— Immy ti0 . Jlert TYFA oRUq•TKO ioily�{P 1R.V1Fa+pw1 IDayv.•IEE fF{IVKf (rlllllilflaw Alew iiaE dRUa' me iE11EfP ipM- •uPtrxf MuwxaaEme� PuN rarmw• •m. , anfnlwle � PEN " o:nrurtuuE - ®P — NIMEf9Taha { AInaE64 TEV P f Y{NWE CN'EEIAIR,LP. LLLI/V Eaf an,ETNR tP vE1UFE o . . plaLaQ a1a1LOt 11A1'Jf ypaEL YFNt EbaaT UWE ( M. H1' rLVE® 9rFEG' TENIAF6 E,O SF(FE�']a tmlHwlfl . •' PATE/ SIRED TFAnPaa INS Iy,aK80r Tl , �flgR 'P- Sw � � .. �' �rvlwuaw AnEflilke ; suuRllrce .iTTJ C/nJ99w _ eNIG -0Rm Ai wenso arsMCriaVi Prsvelnov .. fulyEn. NPEr�+T cwda MY TiP7 ' IFIACCIDEHTINVQLVEp4COl4MgggW .tjgq"VEHI•d -L 6CHOOLUU9,ORHFJ1q @TlIRT @U9 ? Pfhp rot z}id 19 @.d911j: 'J IitEI�A19IixG NOTIFYTHa STATE DATROL roquliadunr�rR1$�69.7RJ WN1rERCNLYEf .'(RAiliMFE11.Ya1�uPPIfr11NMfl GOThVbaER _ .. CNWEREALYOOC }EY.Ya�wi•YaTORCHLgip WJ.t4 RaINVl11F1I K 11YTi1rStE.. _ V'AI ro'sm aNeaFIF:Y 6fk 71'EE WB P•E9!6 DER aJ fEY minsP lgklr.^Mr .•. _ , 'INREFRYCB PImIWRfN .._ QJm QOT- �, MlbsuRrF.E m IR0.sw 9-- . • A. INdEFRY1EE' -" 'RU111Mrew [JOTRNI d:H:yl E7aMAIW>AaFOPFOMAfT�• •9 DEf IKWWEEG PIIa {•EAfYNIpORtEIIbMT)EN- �fiRlf) •_ aNMGFDFRa.^ER11'IY[LLat T/DPI14IfR Both eehs had Iaeeq kravelip(l Southbound on Ave, briver. 2 indicated that .he. •had_.atopped jcrsaYt ?�� 03 M 11'Wooddate u 371 i I M, bus. stop sign that had.been activated. crmF15•' `'Driver- •1•said that.• she. -had• been •1ooking••at- t- he -•• -� 1+fPn ? dashboard looking ror a defrbst.button, did mot. g bl TYPEEF TYZ w O''sad e ° that 'the "voh "ahead *of - hJid'stoppetl-gnd'"' ._ ded veh. ? ' 9 8 t�5: zf th second rearen e „• _ ,• .y _ dill LtL Yra/ Z...•• _ ••• ••• •• •• •._ • $' 02 ,�A 1 I I � I I IlY IOEYrN � _• •• 1 Ta.Rt Uvif 0 M J. (I I ME. isnuw P0. 1R'N lma i Ntara Limbeck 135• Edina PD p"'Tl OdjMA i https:// wWW, dvsl esuppoit .org /dvsinfo /accidentrecords_ 2008 /lnoltides_LE /Prijitl)VSRepol t.,. 11/8/2012 � '� O� �D ► MEMO %ngeering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 A. Flax 9m52 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com �1�, Ok e ' to 0 Date: March 19, 2013 v .� To: City Council From: Wayne Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Current Wooddale Avenue Pedestrian and Bike Observations Attached is the current pedestrian and bike observations for Wooddale Avenue. These observations were recorded from a portable traffic camera that was placed in the corridor on August 16 and 24 and also on October I and 3. Additional observations will continue throughout the evaluation period for the advisory bike lanes. Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 Counts and Observations for Wooddale Avenue Date Location Peds Total Peds Bikes Total Bikes SB NB SB NB c M, 08/23/2012 - 08/24/2012 Wooddale Avenue and 55th Street 50 54 104 99 98 197 a2 W SB NB SB NB m 08/16/2012 - 08/17/2012 Wooddale Avenue and 60th Street 23 30 53 31 61 92 Peds Bikes Total Peds On Sidewalk On Road Parking Bay Bike Lane Parking Bay Sidewalk Total Bikes SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB' SB NB SB NB N 10/03/2012 10/04/2012 Wooddale Avenue and 55th Street 51 50 4 0 3 4 112 47 29 0 40 11 27 154 v c SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB- SB NB SB NB a 10/01/2012 - V a 10/02/2012 Wooddale Avenue and 60th Street 34 44 7 3 1 0 89 26 16 4 22 1 3 72 rers \WHoule\AOPData\Loral \Mlo wft \Wln4-^ \Temporarylntemet Flles \COntent.OWook \DYNBNG61\Totals 03- 14- 2013x1s - n.re Geated: 3 /14/2013 VII[ E Sharon Allison Wayne Houle Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:31 PM To: Sharon Allison; Susan Howl Subject: FW: Wooddale Avenue Advisory Bike Lanes Can either one of you put this on the Council's dais for tonight? Thanks 0;s1t,�^ Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering c $ `� 952- 826 -04431 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 WHoule @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov �,r.. ;. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Steve Clark [ mailto:stevec @ticminnesota.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:57 PM To: Wayne Houle; 'Schoenecker, Ted (DOT)' Cc: 'Mike Anderson (manderson @alliant - inc.com)'; Erickson, Dan (DOT); Eue, Scott (DOT) Subject: RE: Wooddale Avenue Advisory Bike Lanes Hi Wayne and Ted, his email reaffirms TLC's position and MnDOT's previous guidance regarding the Advisory Bike Lanes on Wooddale Avenue. TLC encourages the City of Edina to delay any action on this matter until an objective analysis of the pre and post treatment data collection is completed. Reinstalling the center line and removing the advisory bike lanes would be inconsistent with the intent of this award to Edina, provided through the federal Non - motorized Transportation Pilot Program. Such a change would result in a roadway less encouraging of bicyclists, unless the parking lane was also removed and solid bike lanes were marked and signed, as originally proposed. This option (to allow for solid striped bike lanes) has always been supported by TLC. Let me know if you have any questions. Steve Clark Walking and Bicycling Program Manager Transit for Livable Communities 651 - 789 -1419 www.bikewalktwincities.org From: Wayne Houle [mailto:WHoule@EdinaMN.gov] ent: Monday, March 18, 2013 7:28 AM .o: 'Schoenecker, Ted (DOT)' Cc: Steve Clark; 'Mike Anderson (manderson alliant- inc.com)'; Erickson, Dan (DOT); Eue, Scott (DOT) Subject: RE: Wooddale Avenue Advisory Bike Lanes Sorry, here is the Council Report. Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering 952- 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 WHoule(cDEdinaMN.gov J www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Schoenecker, Ted (DOT) fmailto :Ted.Schoenecker @state.mn.us] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 6:10 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: 'Steve Clark'; 'Mike Anderson (manderson @alliant- inc.com)'; Erickson, Dan (DOT); Eue, Scott (DOT) Subject: RE: Wooddale Avenue Advisory Bike Lanes Wayne — We got both of your e- mails. In the first one, the council agenda report was not attached. We'll get back to you today with some responses. Ted From: Wayne Houle fmailto:WHoule @EdinaMN.gov1 Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 2:49 PM To: Schoenecker, Ted (DOT) Cc: 'Steve Clark'; 'Mike Anderson (manderson @alliant- inc.com)'; Erickson, Dan (DOT); Eue, -Scott (DOT) Subject: RE: Wooddale Avenue Advisory Bike Lanes Ted: Here is another option I would like considered: Provide a dedicated south bound bike lane with a north bound share the road for the stretch of 56th St to 50th St, since we have 28 -feet of travel lane to play with. So this would provide a 6 -ft south bound bike lane and two 11 -ft travel lanes. The area from 56th St to Valley View Rd is only 24 -feet of travel lane; this area would be share the. road for each direction. I think this would be ok since the ADT is lower in this section. Sorry for the additional request —just received it from a City Council member. Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering c`f @ 952- 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 WHoulea.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Wayne Houle Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:25 PM To: ' Schoenecker, Ted (DOT)' Cc: 'Steve Clark'; 'Mike Anderson (manderson @alliant - inc.com)'; Erickson, Dan (DOT); Eue, Scott (DOT); Scott Neal Subject: RE: Wooddale Avenue Advisory Bike Lanes Ted: We have this on the City Council agenda for Tuesday night, see attached report. I put together a resolution for the City Council to approve that would direct staff to make the application. Given that the variance request would be for a lane reduction, because the State Aid rules would be probably be interpreted that we could not include the advisory bike lane in the lane width. So that leaves the south end of Wooddale with 7' travel lanes and the north end of Wooddale with 9' travel lanes. Given my experience with MNDOT, I would be very surprised if MNDOT staff would support this — can you comment on this? So given the possibility that this variance would not be approved, could we remove the . ivisory bike lanes, change them to share the road and add the centerline (dashed) stripe? And would this jeopardize the funding for any portion of the project? I believe that a centerline stripe will not solve the public perception issue, since the public does not understand that they can drive in the bike lanes, if a biker is not present. The City would be willing to continue the evaluation period for Wooddale, however, it would then be evaluating the share the road. We will still provide an evaluation for West 54th Street. I would really like an answer on this change out to share the road by Tuesday morning. If we don't lose the funding, I believe I could offer this option on Tuesday night and the Council would go with it. I will. be tied up in interviews on Monday, so either leave a voice mail or email. Thanks for jumping on this right away (I think you can sense the urgency). Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering 952 - 826 -04431 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Y` WHouIe0__EdinaMN..qov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Schoenecker, Ted (DOT) [mailto:Ted.Schoenecker @ state.mn.us] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 2:05 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: 'Steve Clark'; 'Mike Anderson (mandersonC & alliant- inc.com)'; Schoenecker, Ted (DOT); Erickson, Dan (DOT); Eue, Scott (DOT) 'ubject: RE: Wooddale Avenue Advisory Bike Lanes Wayne — This is an item that we will have to take a little time to look into to determine what is the correct process because it could affect both state aid rules (variance) and federal aid rules (design exception). Two of our key federal aid staff are on vacation this week but will be back next week. I would like to get their input and discuss some potential options. If it is determined that you need to bring forward a state aid rules variance request, the deadline to be on the agenda for the March variance committee meeting has passed, but their next meeting is in June (they meet quarterly). We will be in touch with you next week. Ted Ted W. Schoenecker I Metro District State Aid Engineer Direct: 651 - 234 -7761 ted.schoenecker @state.mn.us MnDOT Metro District 1500 W. County Rd 132 i Roseville, MN 55113 'rom: Wayne Houle [mailto:WHoule @EdinaMN.govl ant: Monday, March 11, 2013 1:00 PM To: Schoenecker, Ted (DOT) - Cc: 'Steve Clark'; 'Mike Anderson (manderson @ alliant- inc.com)' Subject: Wooddale Avenue Advisory Bike Lanes Ted: Our City Council requested that staff pursue options to make Wooddale Avenue feel safer such as painting a centerline through the advisory bike lanes. Being a federally funded project that was appropriated by the Transit for Liveable Communities I realize that this questions needs to be answered by more than the MnDOT State Aid Variance Committee. Can you let me know the process and submittal requirements for the different MnDOT groups that would need to review and hopefully approve this variation? Thanks MD-t�— Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering 952 - 826 -0443 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 Moule(M-EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov ("...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business 4 r I 1 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL q�NA�l Off.`' �. U) Agenda Item #: VIII. F. From: James Hovland Action Mayor. Discussion ❑ Date: March 19, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -30 In Support Of A Metropolitan Area Dedicate Transit Sales Tax Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: Mayor Hovland will be presenting this resolution requested by the Regional Conference of Mayor. , The resolution supports a sales tax increase to support sustained investment to building out and operate the metropolitan region's transit system. Attachment: Resolution No. 2013 -30 Draft Letter To Speaker Thissen Regional Transit System Map City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-30 IN SUPPORT OF A METROPOLITAN AREA DEDICATED TRANSIT SALES TAX WHEREAS, the Seven County Metropolitan Area ( "Metro ") is the economic engine for the State of Minnesota producing approximately 75% of the state's domestic gross product; and WHEREAS, the Metro is expected to grow by approximately 600,000 people by 2030; and WHEREAS, the Metro has been working diligently to grow, retain and attract jobs for our state economy; and WHEREAS, an effective and efficient transportation system is critical to be able to economically compete with other regions in the country and to attract new companies and employees to our Metro region; and WHEREAS, an effective and efficient transit system relieves congestion for highway and roadway users, attracts new economic investments, provides an essential mobility infrastructure for workers, businesses and students; and WHEREAS, approximately 79% of Minnesotans believe our state would benefit from having an expanded and improved public transit system; and 65% of Minnesotans support an increase in the Metro area sales tax to fund transit. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Edina does hereby encourage all Minnesota legislators to support the passage of a bill providing for a Metro wide increase in the sales tax in order to create a reliable and sufficient transit funding source that not only keeps the Twin Cities Metropolitan Region highly competitive with other regions but helps Minnesota create a world class transportation system that will allow our state to compete more effectively on a global scale and reach our full economic development potential. Attest: Passed and adopted by the City Council of Edina this 19th day of March, 2013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 19, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Debra A. Mangen, Edina City Clerk Regional Council of ayors Majority Leader Thomas Bakk 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Capitol, Room 226 St. Paul, MN 55155 -1606 Speaker Paul Thissen 463 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 RE: Proposed regional sales tax for transit Dear Majority Leader Bakk and Speaker Thissen: Please see the attached list of members of the Regional Council of Mayors who are in support of a sales tax increase to support sustained investment to build out and operate the metropolitan region's transit system as defined by the Governor's Transportation Finance Advisory Committee. The Regional Council of Mayors was formed in 2005 and provides a non - partisan platform focused on building action strategies to raise the region's overall economic competitiveness and quality of life. The Regional Council of Mayors believes that the development of a competitive regional transit system is key to our region's long -term economic competitiveness and vitality. The development of a complete and multi -modal transit system is necessary for all of our communities to provide essential mobility, relieve congestion, attract new investment, and create jobs for all Minnesotans. We represent a diverse set of municipalities from across the region, each with its own character and needs. Across that diversity, we understand that the health and prosperity of our communities is linked to that of the region. By investing in our regional transit infrastructure, the Governor's plan will help maintain our region's economic competitiveness and allow our towns and cities to thrive. Indeed, a recent study by the Itasca Project, an organization led by some of the region's leading CEOs, confirms the importance of investing in transit to the region's economy. It found that building out the region's transit network would create a return on investment of between $6.5 and $13.9 billion, or between 7.8% and 20.9 %. We believe the Governor's proposal represents an opportunity that our region cannot afford to pass up. We urge you to join us in supporting that proposal to help fund the investments that our region needs to thrive. Cc: Representative Hornstein, Representative Erhardt, Senator Dibble IV Existing Transit System Valley Will Schroeer Director, Infrastructure for Economic Development 612.370.9157 wschroeer @minneapolischamber.org c (MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL( hanihicr o(CrnnmcKc SAINT PAUL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Bloomington Chamber of Commerce CHAMBER O F C O M M E RC E Nenheast Mmneapohs Ctwm0er of Commerce Help transform today's transit map... into this competitive economic engine. Visit www.MoreJobsLessTraffic.com for info. I IN Minneapolis-St. Paul 2 Existing : Proposed nsit Corridors �I� err Transit Network for Economic • , gF Competitiveness and Congestion Relief mp--nis made possible .6"'new revenue Proposed Southwest LRT I Gfeen Line Extension METRO flied Line 0ji,eaths LRT) METRO Green Line ICentral Corridor LRTi -- Aw s ,:1r Exoitusg Bids System to Grew 1% A-tielly l : P � ' T R : C®M�M :� DATI • R OR Too MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: March 19, 2013 -A, Cn o j��ORPOP.F+��q o 1880 Agenda Item #: VIII.G Action Discussion 0 Information Subject: Consideration of Revisions to the approved plans for Southdale Apartments Action Requested: Approve the attached revisions, or send the request for full review and recommendation to the Planning Commission. If the item is referred to the Planning Commission, the City Council would then take final action as a revised Site Plan, following the Planning Commission recommendation. I Information / Background: The applicant is requesting some revisions to the approved plans for the Southdale Apartments. (See A attached narrative explaining the revisions in detail.) The highlights of the revisions include: ➢ Elimination of the York Avenue intersection improvements. Applicant has stated that a pedestrian crossing on York would be added, but is not shown on the proposed plan. ➢ Revising Building B from 6 stories to 5 stories. ➢ Revising-Building-C--from 4- stories to 3 stories. Building C becomes. apartment style housing rather than 2 story townhomes. ➢ Enhanced landscaping replaces the drive aisles behind Building C. ➢ Changed pervious pavers on surface drives — now bituminous. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50`h St. • Edina, MN 55424 BKV G R O U P Architecture Interior Design Engineering Boa man Kroos Vogel Group Inc. Memorandum PROJECT: One Southdale Place COMM. NO.: 1884.01 DATE: March 4, 2013 RE: Clarifications and Revisions update to City of Edina Below reflects a comprehensive list of layout and configuration changes that were implemented to adhere to conditions placed on the project by the Planning Commission and City Council. Our goal was to remain true to, or enhance, the original approvals. The essence and spirit of the design remains, showcasing more cost- effective implementation efforts. Siteworlc Revisions (numbers are coordinated with plan): I. Added significant landscape buffering and pedestrian paths /connections by removing drive; aprons and curb /gutter on the west (Mall) side of Building C 2. ,Added a sidewalk connection north to Transit Station 3. Added crosswalk indicator (to be finalized with City of Edina) to Westin & Galleria across 69`". 4. Reconstructed parking lot island to create a green pedestrian connection to Southdale Mall 5. Eliminated boardwalk "bridges" over rain gardens 6. Revised and improved courtyard design 7. Offering one pedestrian crossing on south side of intersection (pending County approval) in lieu of full intersection reconstruction on York Ave, due to elimination of secondary north entry to underground parking. 8. Reduced maximum berm height to 6 feet 9. Changed pervious pavers on surface drives — now bituminous 10. Upgraded entrance turnaround to concrete for longer -term viability. Paver walk still surrounds turnaround Building Revisions(numbers are coordinated with plan): I. Change of shape for Building C from curvilinear to segmented. Form remains similar. 2. Parking garage efficiency enhanced by upgrading layout from curvilinear to segmented. Total Garage & Surface Stalls: 327 stalls previously, 338 currently. 3. Walls of I` floor Lobby and Club Room changed from curvilinear to segmented 4. Northerly parking garage access ramp was eliminated due to enhancements in parking efficiency 5. Reduced height of Building B by one story from 6 to 5 stories. Construction type went from 5 -story wood on I -story concrete above grade, to 5 -story wood type III -B construction. 6. Reduced height of Building C courtyard, taking it from 4 -story wood type V -A to 3 -story wood type V -B construction. Eliminated green roofs from roof of 3- story building due to change in unit type from 2 -story townhomes and garages with roof access to stacked flats. q:\ 1884 -01 \I \cor \dd clarifications memo to city 0225 13_dmm.doc PROJECT SUMMARY FLOOR TOTAL %K PRG 11. FLOOR FLOOR ROOK RGa RWR BOOR FLOOR RCCR 511 Mdans (numbers are coordinated with WLDRIG FOOTPRIW WRe 1. Added significant landscape buffering and m North Sico d St'd pedestrian paths/connections by removing drive, aprons T11pROys 2-3 55+01 Tc*rli. a 612-339 -3752 and curo/gufter on the west (Mall) side d Building C — b 612- 339 -6211 www.ekvyrovp.LOm 2. Added a sidewalk connection north to Transit Station STUIRT 3. Added crosswalk indicator (to be finalized with City of 5 , - , . _ S0.N! Y FLOOR AREA N 1 _'Z u,YT .l.Y. A >SR. n.PN T,a!! ]qO5) Ia,TOr ra.AI II.YI it JRD,IRR S! DWELLING OMTS tersecbon reconstruction on York Ave due to elimination of secondary north entry to underground parking. Southdale Housing 8. Reduced maximum berm height to 6 feet 9. Changed pervious pavers on surface drives - now bituminous 1 B. Upgraded enhance turnaround to concrete for lon- 2. lRerR PARKING -S.N PARRPG- TOWNN(WE Ml AALLs PERM0U5 uA>O s uMT oENm ROOK A— RANG KEY NOTES QQ u.R.x :Legend (� omFr frm mxxx f -- Ar dA Ar Site Revisions iorDet mksfwr Building Revisions Gnrq 511 Mdans (numbers are coordinated with plan): 1. Added significant landscape buffering and m North Sico d St'd pedestrian paths/connections by removing drive, aprons T11pROys 2-3 55+01 Tc*rli. a 612-339 -3752 and curo/gufter on the west (Mall) side d Building C — b 612- 339 -6211 www.ekvyrovp.LOm 2. Added a sidewalk connection north to Transit Station STUIRT 3. Added crosswalk indicator (to be finalized with City of 5 , - , . _ Edina) to Westin & Galleria across 691h. 4. Reconstructed parking lot island to create a green 111111111,11-1 •:; on Previously Approved Plan W. "'e s '10 otins =o ,1�� x''"` 0 J ^2 Building Revisions(numbers are coordinated with ��..,�_+......�..- Ian �• P. Change of shape for Building C from curvilineartosegmented. Formremainssinrlac s 2. Parking garage efficiency enhanced by upgrading layout from curvilinear to segmented. Total Garage & Surface Stalls: 327 stalls previously, 338 currently 3. Walls of 1 st floor Lobby and Club Room charged from curvilinear to segmented 4 Northerly parking garage access ramp was eliminated due to enhancements in parking efficiency 5. Reduced height of Building B by one story from 6 to 5 SrM PLAN stores. Construction type went from 5 -story wood on 1 -story concrete above grade, to 5 -story wood type III -B construction. 6. Reduced height of Building C courtyard, taking it from 4 -story wood type V -A to 3 -story wood type V -B construction. Eliminated green roofs from L I oo roof d 3 -stay building due to change In unit type from 2 -story townhomes and garages with rod access to e roI R�c.PKL« stacked flats. B K V :Legend G R O U P -- Ar dA Ar Site Revisions iorDet mksfwr Building Revisions Gnrq 511 Mdans (numbers are coordinated with plan): 1. Added significant landscape buffering and m North Sico d St'd pedestrian paths/connections by removing drive, aprons T11pROys 2-3 55+01 Tc*rli. a 612-339 -3752 and curo/gufter on the west (Mall) side d Building C — b 612- 339 -6211 www.ekvyrovp.LOm 2. Added a sidewalk connection north to Transit Station STUIRT 3. Added crosswalk indicator (to be finalized with City of 5 , - , . _ Edina) to Westin & Galleria across 691h. 4. Reconstructed parking lot island to create a green pedestrian connection to Southdale Mall 5. Eliminated boardwalk °bridges- over rain gardens 6. Revised and improved courtyard design 7. Offering one pedestrian crossing on south side of intersection (pending County approval) in lieu of full in• tersecbon reconstruction on York Ave due to elimination of secondary north entry to underground parking. Southdale Housing 8. Reduced maximum berm height to 6 feet 9. Changed pervious pavers on surface drives - now bituminous 1 B. Upgraded enhance turnaround to concrete for lon- ger- term viability Paver walk still surrounds turnaround Building Revisions(numbers are coordinated with ��..,�_+......�..- Ian �• P. Change of shape for Building C from curvilineartosegmented. Formremainssinrlac s 2. Parking garage efficiency enhanced by upgrading layout from curvilinear to segmented. Total Garage & Surface Stalls: 327 stalls previously, 338 currently 3. Walls of 1 st floor Lobby and Club Room charged from curvilinear to segmented 4 Northerly parking garage access ramp was eliminated due to enhancements in parking efficiency 5. Reduced height of Building B by one story from 6 to 5 SrM PLAN stores. Construction type went from 5 -story wood on 1 -story concrete above grade, to 5 -story wood type III -B construction. 6. Reduced height of Building C courtyard, taking it from 4 -story wood type V -A to 3 -story wood type V -B construction. Eliminated green roofs from L I oo roof d 3 -stay building due to change In unit type from 2 -story townhomes and garages with rod access to e roI R�c.PKL« stacked flats. KEY NOTES Legend Qu.or�w Q ue+rw w Qi m,nv m¢ <v.w Q .,Rn mnr sm. ,rm ..art• l for D-V L-d—p. An, bIUM, re Site Revisions °..�,. Kreea Veje1 Building Revisions aw Silevi Revisions (numbers are coordinated with m North Second Se— plan): r+.r,e I M 55401 1. Added significant landscape buflenng and Tekplwne. 612- 379 -3752 pedestrian paths /connections by removing drive, aprons Fmllc 612 - 739 -6212 .bkvg�ou p.com and curb/guder on the west (Mall) side of Building C 2. Added a sidewalk connection north to Transit Station LEGEND 3. Added crosswalk indicator (to be finalized with City of �ofyaaa�ka�xecn� Current Plan f.& �A4 A I Q "i iflar\ WEST 69TH STREET / MIy 1 ki,� 0 °T 10 C® eve C B K Legend G R O U P Amh Mae l for D-V L-d—p. An, bIUM, re Site Revisions °..�,. Kreea Veje1 Building Revisions aw Silevi Revisions (numbers are coordinated with m North Second Se— plan): r+.r,e I M 55401 1. Added significant landscape buflenng and Tekplwne. 612- 379 -3752 pedestrian paths /connections by removing drive, aprons Fmllc 612 - 739 -6212 .bkvg�ou p.com and curb/guder on the west (Mall) side of Building C 2. Added a sidewalk connection north to Transit Station 3. Added crosswalk indicator (to be finalized with City of Edina) to Westin & Gai across 69th. 4. Reconstructed parking la island to create a green Design pedesMan connection to Spdhdale Mall Development 5. Eliminated boardwalk "bridges' over rain gardens 6. Revised and improved courtyard design 7. Offering one pedestrian crossing on south side of intersection (pending County approval) in lieu of full in- tersection reconstruction on York Ave due to elirtYnaticn One Southdake of secondary north entry to underground parking. Place 8. Reduced madmum berm height to 6 feet 9. Changed pervious pavers on surface drives – row bituminous, 10. Upgraded entrance turnaround to concrete for lon- ger-term viability Paver walk still surrounds turnaround gym. Building Revisions(numbers are coordinated with ...u..............,. plan): 1. Change of shape for Building C from —� curvilineartosegmented. form remains similar. 2. Parking garage efficiency enhanced by Total Garage & Surface Stalls: 327 stalls previously, 338 zmvupgradirlglayoutfmmcurNlineartosegmented. currently 3. Walls of 1 st floor Lobby and Club Room changed from curvilinear to segmented 4. Northerly parking garage access ramp was elirr inated due to enhancements in parking efficiency SITE PLAN 5. Reduced height of Building B by one story from 6 to 5 Stories. Construction type went from 5 -story wood on 1 -story concrete above grade, to 5 -story wood type 111.8 construction. L' 00 6. Reduced height of Building C courtyard. taking it from 4 -story wood type V -A to 3 -story wood type V -B construction. Eliminated green roofs from roof of 3 -story building due to change in unit type from 2 -stay townhomes and garages with roof access to stacked flats. Southdale Residential Development Land Use Application Package - 09 1 � 1 City of Edina, Minnesota SU ART':� Southdale Residential Development Land Use Application Package - 09.12.12 av�G P Southdale Residential Development Land Use Application Package - 09.12.12 e, K,v Southdale Residential Development Land Use Application Package - 09.12.12 g, Kuv Quuthdale Residential Development Land Use Application Package - 09.12.12 ■ B K L.and Use Application Package - 09.12.12 (S.; 0 I i e - It I", 1 1 3 � 117� !, .1 1� I STUART pj BKV Southdale Place Residential Developmeni 03.05.13 BKV Southdale Place Residential Development 03.05.1 3 BKV Sow. hdr ale Place Residential Development 03.05.13 BKV Southdale Place Residential Development 03.05.93 BKV SOL�� d -,?!r. Place Residential Development 03.05.• 1 Z, BKV Southdale Place Residential Development 03.05.935 B K V To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering P1888 I Agenda Item #: VIII. H. Action Discussion ❑ Date: March 19, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -32 France Avenue Pedestrian Enhancement Easements Action Requested: Approve attached Resolution No. 2013 -32. Information / Background: The France Avenue Pedestrian Enhancement project requires six easements to complete the project as submitted to Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT). All six property owners have committed to donating the easements. Two additional easements from Byerly's and Macy's will be required if the Byerly's redevelopment proposal is approved. Five of the six easements that require City Council approval are: Centennial Lake 11, L.L.C. Easement Southdale Center LLC Easement U.S. Bank National Association Easement Nash -Finch Company Easement Edina Business Plaza, LLC Easement The Galleria Shopping Center easement does not require City Council approval. Our City Attorney's office has been working with each properties legal counsel to come to final easements and has prepared the attached resolution and easements. One of the easements has been signed and the other easements are being signed by the respective owners. The project is still on track to receive MNDOT approval on March 31. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -32 Centennial Lake 11, L.L.C. Easement Southdale Center LLC Easement U.S. Bank National Association Easement Nash -Finch Company Easement Edina Business Plaza, LLC Easement Q7MCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\CONTRACTS\2013\ENG 13 -5 France Ave Intersections \BA404 Intersections EnhanceWl easements\Item Vlll. H. Resolution No. 2013.32 France Ave Ped Enhancemnt Easements.docx City of Edina -• 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -32 l CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING EASEMENTS FOR THE FRANCE AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City requires additional permanent and temporary construction easements for public sidewalk and utilities in connection with the City's 2013 France Avenue Pedestrian Enhancement Project; WHEREAS, the following property owners have agreed to provide the necessary easements at no cost to the City for the property they own within the project, under conditions identified in the corresponding easement attached hereto: Centennial Lake II, L.L.C. Easement Southdale Center LLC Easement U.S. Bank National Association Easement Nash -Finch Company Easement Edina Business Plaza, LLC Easement (collectively referred to herein as "Easements ") WHEREAS, the City agrees to the terms and conditions of the Easements; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina: The City approves easements for the properties owned by the following property owners within the Project area, substantially in the forms attached hereto: Centennial Lake II, L.L.C. Easement Southdale Center LLC Easement U.S. Bank National Association Easement Nash - Finch Company Easement Edina Business.Plaza, LLC Easement 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Third Amendment. Dated: March 19, 2013 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the -City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 19, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNI�SS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard d• Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 (reserved for recording information) GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS This Agreement is entered into this _ day of , 2013, by CENTENNIAL LAKES II, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", and the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", its successors and assigns,. RECITALS A. Grantor owns real property legally described as Lot 3, Block 1, South Edina Development Third Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Property"). B. Grantor is willing to grant the City the following easements subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFOR, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and the City agree as follows: 1. Grantor hereby grants to the City a permanent, non - exclusive easement for public sidewalk and underground utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through that portion of the Property legally described on the attached Exhibit "A "(the "Permanent Easement Area")" and 168068v1 depicted on Exhibit A -1, including the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the Permanent Easement Area at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public sidewalk and utility systems, at the City's sole cost, over, across, on, under, and through the Permanent Easement Area, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the Permanent Easement Area, and the further right to remove from the Permanent Easement Area trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk and utility easements. The City shall be solely responsible for constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining said sidewalk and utilities and all costs related thereto. 2. Grantor hereby grants to the City a temporary, non - exclusive construction easement over, across, on, under, and through that portion of the Property legally described on the attached Exhibit "A "(the "Temporary Easement Area" and, together with the "Permanent Easement Area" the "Easement Area ") and depicted on Exhibit A -1. To have and to hold the same, unto the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, commencing upon execution of this Agreement and. expiring December 31, 2013, together with the right of ingress to and egress from the Temporary Easement Area, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns, all at the City's sole cost. Grantor hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the right to use and enjoy the above described Temporary Easement Area, subject only to the right of the City to. use the same for the purposes herein expressed. As a condition of said temporary construction easement grant, the City shall, upon completion of construction and prior to termination, restore the ground surface of the Temporary Easement Area to its original condition so far as is reasonably practicable with the exception of any grade changes, bank sloping, ditching, fills, slope construction, cuts and any removal of earth, other 168068A 2 materials, trees and other vegetation. 3. The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises except the rights, if any, of tenants under unrecorded leases; and that it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 4. The rights granted to the City under this Agreement are subject to all existing matters of public record. Grantor reserves the right to occupy, use and improve the Easement Area for all purposes not inconsistent with, nor interfering with the rights herein granted to the City. 5. The City agrees that its use of the Easement Area will not interfere with any existing utilities or improvements on the Property. The City shall be responsible for any damage to the Easement Area and/or to the Property caused by the use of said sidewalk or said utilities, and shall pay Grantor its reasonable costs of repairing any such damage upon the demand of Grantor. 6. This Agreement shall be binding upon and benefit the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns, and shall run with the land. 168068A 3 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor and the City have signed this Agreement this day of , 20_ 34 97.1w"ITS Centennial Lakes II, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company By: Centennial Jack II, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its: Managing Member By: State Farm Realty Investment Company, an Arizona corporation Its: Managing Member By: Its By: Its: STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of March, 2013, by the of State Farm Realty Investment Company, an Arizona corporation, Managing Member of Centennial Jack H, L.L.C., a Delaware limited. liability company, Managing Member of Centennial Lakes H, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability corporation, on behalf of the limited liability company. Signature of Person Taking acknowledgment Title: 168068v1 4 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of March, 2013, by , the of State Farm Realty Investment Company, an Arizona corporation, Managing Member of Centennial Jack H, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company,. Managing Member of Centennial Lakes II, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability corporation, on behalf of the limited liability company. Signature of Person Taking acknowledgment Title: 168068v1 5 GRANTEE: CITY OF EDINA . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNuTsoN Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651 452 -5000 RNK/cjh 168068v1 6 EXIIIBIT "A" Permanent Easement Area Legal Description: A permanent sidewalk and utility easement over, under, and across that portion of Lot 3, Block 1, South Edina Development Third Addition ( "Lot 3 "), as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies northerly of Line A to be hereinafter described: Commencing at the most northerly northeast corner of said Lot 3, thence North 58 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northeasterly line thereof, 3 6. 10 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point A; thence continue North 58 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, 6.61 feet to the point of beginning of said Line A; thence North 64 degrees 55 minutes 44 seconds_West, 55.09 feet; thence westerly along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 294.00 feet, central angle of 24 degrees 57 minutes 11 seconds for 128.04 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, 51.47 feet to the northwesterly line of said Lot 3 and there terminating. Temporary Easement Area Legal Description: A temporary construction easement across that portion of said Lot 3, which lies southwesterly and southeasterly of the northeasterly and northwesterly line of said Lot 3, southerly of said Line A and northerly of the following described line: Beginning at said Point A; thence South 31 degrees 11 minutes 13 seconds West, 16.17 feet; thence North 58 degrees 48 minutes 47 seconds West, 13.10 feet; thence North 25 degrees 04 minutes 16 seconds East, 12.47 feet; thence North 64 degrees 55 minutes 44 seconds West, 46.91 feet; thence westerly along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 29 1. 00 feet, central angle of 24 degrees 57 minutes 11 seconds for 126.73 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, 41.70 feet; thence South 53 degrees 17 minutes 48 seconds West, 57.82 feet to the northwesterly line of said Lot 3 and there terminating. Said temporary easement shall expire on December 31, 2013. 168068v1 7 EXHIBIT A -I Depiction of Easement Area 111 1 . Fq 0. sa9 'r.ae'u jt Z •J SrR ��t`O I •�4.g /..4 TO , 1:71E ITT J. IJ III 'I 1! <5. �3�9•� ���� Gft7P.GFRR�YA'CF.71ir.'ASt I I 1 1 1 I YI.W ILb7 kJP °/J -�\ i C"rx:6 tof3 1 I 531 °al'13•B � _ c _ Q4. Is j I BLOC( 1 _�.... _ I a PARCEL 1 a POf -028.2433-0Df3 OpgOfi r LL01�� soo Y. v„ f r I I s I i LL. j e se ,ee s I a 0 PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT AREA = 1,793 sq R S m , PROPOSEO TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA= 1,262 pq R 7O1Xenia Avenue SaUUl; ulfa 3oo France AvenUajrnproVementS ,:Qty,,, � WS6PmledNo.103M 6UrinsapoOa,MN55419 Date: 11120112 WSB wwwsbeng.com basement Parcel Sketch e y JY . ® _ r Parcel No. 1 1aa,Irm.rafLVSwm City of Edina, Minnesota INFR STRUGM r ETSG MMING I PWMG I GON5IRII M - 168068v1 8 MORTGAGE BOLDER CONSENT TO EASEMENT JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, which holds a mortgage on all or part of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Grant of Permanent and Temporary Easements, which mortgage was recorded May 29, 2008, as Document No. 9139952 with the office of the County Recorder for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Recorder's Office'), and amended pursuant to a Consolidated, Amended and Restated Mortgage, Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated January 31, 2013, and recorded , 2013, as Document No. with'the Recorder's Office, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, consent, and is subject to the foregoing Grant of Permanent and Temporary Easements. JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY By: PPM Finance, Inc., it authorized agent By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013, by the of PPM Finance, Inc., the authorized agent of Jackson National Life Insurance Company, a Michigan corporation, on behalf of the corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 RNK/cjh 168068v1 9 (reserved for recording information) GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS SOUTHDALE CENTER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", its successors and assigns, the following easements: 1. A permanent easement for public sidewalk and underground utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B ", including the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the permanent easement premises at all reasonable times, subject to the terms of attached Exhibit "C ", to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public sidewalk and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the permanent easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the permanent easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other 168076v2 obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk and utility easements. 2. A temporary construction easement over, across, on, under, and through the land situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B ". To have and to hold the same, unto the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, commencing upon execution of this document and expiring October 15, 2013, together with the right of ingress to and egress from the temporary easement premises, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns. Grantor hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the right to use and enjoy the above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes-herein expressed. As a condition of said temporary construction easement grant, the City shall, upon completion of construction and prior to termination, restore the ground surface of the temporary construction easement premises to its original condition so far as is reasonably practicable. The above named Grantor, for itself; its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises. 3. Not withstanding the above, the rights, privileges and easements granted herein are expressly subject to, and Grantee, for itself, its successors and assigns, by the use and enjoyment of such rights, privileges and easements, does agree to be bound by, the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 168076v2 2 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has executed this Agreement this day of March, 2013. GRANTOR: SOUTHDALE CENTER, LLC a Delaware limited liability company LOU STATE OF INDIANA ) )ss. COUNTY OF MARION ) Name: Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of March, 2013, by the of Southdale Center, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, who is presently known to me and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said limited liability company, Grantor. NOTARY PUBLIC 168076v2 3 GRANTEE: CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20____, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTsoN Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651 452 -5000 168076v2 4 AMP 168076v2 EXHIBIT "A" Parcels 6 and 7 Legal Descriptions: That part of Tract G, Registered Land Survey No. 432, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the Easterly line of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1641, distant 281.80 feet North of the southeast corner of said Tract C; thence Southerly along said Easterly line and its Southerly extension a distance of 285.00 feet; thence Southerly to the Northeast corner of Tract D, said Registered Land Survey No. 1641 and there terminating. AND Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1815, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT "B" Easement Descriptions: A permanent sidewalk and utility easement over, under, and across the parcels described in Exhibit A, which lies westerly of Line A hereinafter described: Commencing at the Northwest Corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County Minnesota; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 27 Seconds West, assumed bearing along the west line thereof, 408.98 feet; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds East, 61.95 feet to the west line of said Tract A and the point of beginning of Line A to be hereinafter described; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 27 seconds West, 167.92 feet; thence South 00 degrees 34 minutes 10 seconds East, 30.85 feet; thence South 00 degrees 31 minutes 48 seconds East, 421.40 feet; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 08 seconds West, 314.53 feet; thence South 89 degrees 46 minutes 50 seconds East, 12.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 08 seconds West, 225.86 feet; thence South 04 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds West, 133.58 feet; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 03 seconds West, 124.06 feet to the southwesterly line of said Tract A and said line there terminating. AND ALSO. A temporary construction easement across the parcels described in Exhibit A, which lies easterly of the west line of said Tract A, easterly of said Line A and southerly and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest Corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County Minnesota; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 27 Seconds West, assumed bearing along the. west line thereof, 224.27 feet; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds East, 70.00 feet to the west line of said Tract A and the point of beginning of the-line to be hereinafter described; thence North 89 degrees 34 minutes 34 seconds East, 17.22 feet; thence South 00 degrees 25 minutes 26 seconds East, 89.16 feet; thence South 09 degrees 11 minutes 36 seconds West, 105.36 feet; thence South 00 degrees 16 minutes 51 seconds East, 44.24 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 09 seconds East, 10.00 feet; tbence South 00 degrees 16 minutes 51 seconds East, 52.26 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 09 seconds East, 25.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 16 minutes 51 seconds East, 105.37 feet; thence South 89 degrees 43 minutes 09 seconds West, 30.00 feet; thence South 00 168076v2 6 degrees 16 minutes 51 seconds East, 517.32 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 09 seconds East, 10.00 feet; thence South 00 degree 16 minutes 51 seconds East, 261.61 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 09 seconds East, 48.08 feet; thence South 00 degrees 16 minutes 51 seconds East, 44.35 feet; thence South 89 degrees 43 minutes 09 seconds West, 57.32 feet; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 08 seconds West, 158.20 feet; thence South 04 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds West, 133.59 feet; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 03 seconds West, 135.17 feet to the southwesterly line of said Tract A and there terminating. Said temporary easement shall expire on: October 15, 2013. 168076v2 7 EXHIBIT "C" UTILITY EASEMENT PROVISIONS 1. Grantee shall install the utility facilities at such depth so as to not interfere with the use of the easement lands by Grantor or otherwise as a public sidewalk, and upon completion of such installation, Grantee shall furnish to Grantor a set of reproducible drawings which accurately depict the installed location of the utility facilities and the approximate original depth thereof. 2. Grantee shall thereafter perform all necessary maintenance, repairs and replacement of the utility facilities. 3. The installation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the utility facilities shall be accomplished at no cost or expense to Grantor and Grantee shall, at its expense, promptly restore the subsurface and surface of the land (including pavement, curbs, gutters, landscaping and the like) to the same condition that existed prior to such installation, maintenance, repair and replacement by Grantee. ' 4. Grantee agrees that there shall be no construction between October 16 and December 31 of any given year. 5. Grantor reserves to itself and its successors and assigns, tenants and others claiming by, through or under Grantor, the unrestricted use of the easement lands for pedestrian ingress and egress, and to make such other uses of the easement lands, including underground utilities, as are not herein expressly prohibited and are not inconsistent with the rights and easements herein granted. 6. Grantee will exercise its right under this Agreement in such away as to not interfere with the conduct by Grantor or others claiming by, through or under Grantor of the business(es) now or hereafter located on the easement lands and on the lands located adjacent thereto. 7. Grantee will protect, indemnify, defend and hold harmless Grantor from and against any and all claims (and expenses including without limitation reasonable attorney fees) for death of or injury to any person or damage to property, or any action of every kind and nature which may arise out of or in connection, with or by reason of the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair or use of the facilities, or by reason of Grantee's use of the easements hereinbefore granted, or by reason of the exercis.e of any other right granted it hereunder, except to the extent such claims and actions arise out of or result from the negligent acts or omissions of Grantor, its successors, assigns, agents, contractors, subcontractors, tenants and others acting under authority of, by, through or under Grantor. 168076v2 8 (reservedfor recording information) GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, the following easements: A permanent easement for public sidewalk and utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B ", including the rights of the City; its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the permanent easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public sidewalk and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the permanent easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the permanent easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk and utility easements. 1680744 2. A temporary construction easement over, across, on, under, and through the land situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B ". To have and to hold the same, unto the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, commencing upon execution of this document and expiring upon the earlier of (i) completion of construction of the sidewalk; or December 31, 2013, together with the right of ingress to and egress from the temporary easement premises, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining'the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns. Grantor hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the-right to use and enjoy the above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. As a condition of said temporary construction easement grant, the City shall, upon completion of construction and prior to termination, restore the ground surface of the temporary construction easement premises to its original condition so far as is reasonably practicable with the exception of any grade changes, bank sloping, ditching, fills, slope construction, cuts and any removal of earth, other materials, trees and other vegetation.3. City, its employees, agents and contractors hereby indemnify and hold Grantor harmless from and against any injury, expense, damage, liability or claim incurred by Grantor arising directly or indirectly from the entry rights granted by Grantor to City hereunder or any act or omission by City, its agents, employees, servants, contractors, or any other person entering upon the property under express or implied invitation or consent of City. City further agrees to reimburse Grantor for any costs or expenses, including, but not limited to, court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by Grantor with respect to any such injury, expense, damage, liability or claim. 4. City shall_ require its agents and contractors, if any, to carry worker's compensation insurance as required by applicable law and commercially reasonable 168074v4 2 comprehensive liability coverage for injury to or death of a person or persons and for damage to property occasioned by or arising out of any use of the Property. 5. City shall use the Property only as necessary for the purpose described above, and shall use its best efforts not to interfere with Grantor's use'and enjoyment of the Property. In light of the fact that Grantor operates a retail facility on the Property, City shall not (i) block or in any way restrict access to or from the Property, except when necessary to perform the work identified Paragraph 1 of this Easement Agreement, during such time the City will ensure that only one -half of the access will by under construction at a time or an alternate access will be made available; or (ii) otherwise cause Grantor's operations on the Property to be interfered with or interrupted. City shall keep the Property free and clear of debris at all times and shall not use the Property for the storage of material. 1680744 3 IN TESTIMONY WIIEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this agreement this day of ; 20_ GRANTOR: U.S. Bank National Association STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by , the of First Building Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation, Grantor. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA. ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by , the of First Building Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation, Grantor. 168074v4 4 GRANTEE: CITY OF EDINA STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2Q__, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTsoN Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651452 -5000 RNK/cjh 168074v4 5 E7HIIBIT "A" Parcels 3 and 4 Legal Descriptions: Lot 1, Block 1, except that part thereof which lies Northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the North line of Section 32, Township 28, Range 24 distant 110 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said section to a point on the West line thereof distant 110 Southerly of said Northwest corner; Lot 2, Block 1, except the Easterly 70 feet thereof; Yorktown, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT "B" Easement Descriptions: A permanent sidewalk and utility easement over, under, and across the parcels described iri Exhibit A, which lies easterly of Hennepin County permanent highway easement line as described in document number 2189613 for Parcel No. 22 and westerly of Line A hereinafter described: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Yorktown, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence North 89 degrees 47 minutes 51 seconds East, assumed bearing along the south line thereof,. 13.00 feet to the point of beginning of Line A to be hereinafter described; thence North 04 degrees 55 minutes 37 seconds East, 31.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 26 seconds West, 217.65 feet; thence North 02 degrees 27 minutes 42 seconds West, 47.70 feet; thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 30 seconds West, 77.61 feet to the southeasterly Right of Way line of Hennepin County Road Number 17 (France Avenue) and said Line A there terminating. Also A permanent sidewalk and utility easement over, under, and across the parcels described in Exhibit A, which lies southerly of Hennepin County permanent highway easement line as described in document number 2189613 for Parcel No. 22 and northerly of Line B hereinafter described: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 1,. said Block 1; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 30 seconds East, assumed bearing alone the east line thereof, 5.78 feet to the point of beginning of said Line B; thence South 89 degrees 07 minutes 19 seconds West, 89.46 feet to said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and said Line B there terminating. AND ALSO A temporary construction easement across the parcels described in Exhibit A, which lies easterly of said Line A, easterly of said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 2; thence North 89 degrees 47 minutes 51 seconds East, assumed bearing along the south line thereof, 17.62 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be hereinafter described; thence North 05 degrees 39 minutes 08 seconds East, 31.42 feet; thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 26 seconds West, 217.95 feet; thence North 02 degrees 27 minutes 42 seconds West, 47.78 feet; thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 30 seconds West, 114.87 feet to said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and there terminating. 1680740 6 Also A temporary construction easement across the parcels described in Exhibit A, which lies southerly of said Line B, southerly of said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast comer of Lot 1, said Block 1; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 30 seconds East, assumed bearing alone the east line thereof, 10.30 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be hereinafter described; thence South 86 degrees 14 minutes 51 seconds West, 112.86 feet to said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and there terminating. Said temporary easements shall expire on: December 31, 2013. 168074v4 7 (reserved for recording information) GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS NASH -FINCH COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, the following easements: 1. A permanent easement for public sidewalk and utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B ", including the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the permanent easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public sidewalk and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the permanent easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the permanent easement premises, and the further right to remove I trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk and utility easements. Grantor reserves all rights within the permanent easement premises not inconsistent with the rights of the City herein. 168078v2 2. A temporary construction easement over, across, on, under, and through the land situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibits "A" and "B ". To have and to hold the same, unto the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, commencing upon execution of this document and expiring December 31, 2013, together with the right of ingress to and egress from the temporary easement premises, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns. Grantor hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the right to use and enjoy the above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City'to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. As a condition of said temporary construction easement grant, the City shall, upon completion of construction and prior to termination, restore the ground surface of the temporary construction easement premises to its original condition so far as is reasonably practicable with the exception of any grade changes, bank sloping, ditching, fills, slope construction, cuts and any removal of earth, other materials, trees and other vegetation. 3. Any and all cuts, fills, excavations or embankments necessary in the construction, maintenance or future alteration of any City improvement within the easement premises shall be made and maintained to provide adequate drainage of and from the property owned by Grantor. 4. City shall use the Property only as necessary for the purpose described above, and shall use its best efforts not to interfere with Grantor's use and enjoyment of the Property and to provide Grantor with adequate notice of construction within the easement premises. City shall not (i) block or in any way restrict access to or from the Property, except when necessary to perform the work identified Paragraph 1 of this Easement Agreement, during such time the City will ensure that only one -half of the access will by under construction at a time or an alternate access will be made available; or (ii) otherwise cause Grantor's operations on the Property to be 168078v2 2 interfered with or interrupted. City shall keep the Property free and clear of debris at all times and shall not use the Property for the storage of material. 5. The City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Grantor, its directors, officers, employees (collectively "Grantor ") and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, judgments, lawsuits, costs and expenses arising from or growing out of the entry upon, construction, use or occupancy of the property subject to the Easement, excluding intentional or negligent acts by Grantor. 6. If the City, its contractors, subcontractors, or agents damage or .destroy any of the property or any personal property of Grantor or others as a result of construction, installation or maintenance of the improvements to be constructed by City, such damage or destruction shall be corrected by City in the event the responsible party fails to repair, restore or otherwise remedy the damage or destruction. 7. The above named Grantor does not warrant its title to the property subject to this Easement, nor undertake to defend City in its use, and the grant made by the Easement is subject to all outstanding rights or interest of others, including, but not limited to utility easement. Grantor does warrant that it does have the corporate authority to issue this easement and has passed all necessary corporate resolutions authorizing this easement. 8. The City agrees that Grantor's property will not be assessed for the 2013 France Avenue Construction Project. 9. The City has prepared the legal descriptions identified within this Easement and the City represents and warrants that the legal descriptions match the color coded site plan (also prepared by the City) of the .described easement areas. 16so78v2 3 10. Nothing provided in this Easement shall be construed to be a grant or conveyance by Grantor to the City of any kind of property right or easement except within the area legally describing the property subject to the Easement. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this agreement this day of , 20_ GRANTOR: NASH -FINCH COMPANY In STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) . Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ' 20___, by , the of Nash -Finch Company, a Delaware corporation, on behalf of said corporation, Grantor. 061".1 A ' l eco, 16807sv2 4 day of CITY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this . day of , 20____, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNlTfsoN Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651 -452 -5000 R1VK/cjh 168078v2 EXHIBIT "A" Parcel 11 Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Edina Office Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT "B" Easement Descriptions: A permanent sidewalk and utility easement over, under, and across Lot 1, Block 1, Edina Office Center, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies westerly of Hennepin County permanent high_ way easement line as described in document number 2189613, westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 and easterly of Line A to be hereinafter described: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 00 degrees 44 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line thereof, 344.05 feet to the point of beginning of said Line A, thence northwesterly along a non - tangential curve, concave to the northeast for 26.84 feet, having a radius of 51.00 feet, central angle of 30 degrees 31 minutes 05 seconds, chord bearing of North 16 degrees 00 minutes 53 seconds West and chord distance of 26.84 feet; thence North 00 degrees 45 minutes 20 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 146.80 feet to said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and there terminating. AND A permanent sidewalk and utility easement over, under, and across said Lot 1, which lies southerly of said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and northerly of Line B to be hereinafter described; Commencing at the termination of said Line A; thence North 43 degrees 47 minutes 36 seconds West, 62.87 feet to a point on said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and the point of beginning of Line B; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, 187.03 feet; thence westerly along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 58.00 feet, central angle of 30 degrees 18 minutes 55 seconds, 30.69 feet to said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and there terminating. AND ALSO A temporary construction easement across said Lot 1, which lies westerly of the east line of said Lot 1, westerly of said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line, westerly of said Line A and easterly of a line parallel to and distant 3.00 feet westerly of said Line A. Said parallel line shall extend northerly to its intersection with said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and southerly to its intersection with the east line of said Lot 1. AND A temporary construction easement across said Lot 1, which lies southerly of said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line, southerly of said Line B and northerly of the following described line; commencing at the termination of said Line B; thence North 85 degree 24 minutes 09 seconds West, along said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line, 6.28 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be hereinafter described; thence southeasterly along a non - tangential curve, concave to the north for 30.69 feet, having a radius of 58.00 feet, 168o78v2 6 central angle of 30 degrees 18 minutes 55 seconds, chord bearing of South 74 degrees 43 minutes 27 seconds East and a chord distance of 30.33 feet; thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds East, 145.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 06 seconds West, 3.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds East, 54.35 feet to Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and there terminating. Said temporary easements shall expire on: December 31, 2013. 168078v2 7 (reserved for recording information) GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS EDINA BUSINESS PLAZA, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", its successors and assigns, the following easements: 1. A permanent easement for public sidewalk and utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B ", including the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the permanent easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public sidewalk and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the permanent easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the permanent easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk and utility easements. Other than as set forth in the plans 16so77v2 previously provided to Grantor by Grantee, prior to Grantee performing any other grading for the 2013 project or lowering the ground elevation for the 2013 project on the easement premises, Grantee shall submit to Grantor plans and specifications for such work and Grantee shall perform no such work until such plans and specifications have been approved by Grantor. 2. A temporary construction easement over, across, on, under, and through the land situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B ". To have and to hold the same, unto the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, commencing upon execution of this document and expiring December 31, 2013, together with the right of ingress to and egress from the temporary easement premises, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns. Grantor hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the right to use and enjoy the above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. As a condition of said temporary construction easement grant, the City shall, upon completion of construction and prior to termination, restore the ground surface of the temporary construction easement premises to its original condition so far as is reasonably practicable with the exception of any grade changes, bank sloping, ditching, fills, slope construction, cuts and any removal of earth, other materials, trees and other vegetation. 3. The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 168o77v2 2 4. Grantee will be responsible for renovation, replacement, maintenance, and upkeep of the public sidewalk, any utilities it places in or upon the easement premises. Grantee shall also be responsible for the renovation, replacement, and maintenance of the boulevard area in the easement premises which responsibilities shall include repairing winter and salt damage, sodding or seeding, and weed control. Grantor shall water the boulevard area in the easement premises. 168077v2 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this agreement this day of , 2013. GRANTOR: EDINA BUSINESS PLAZA, LLC Lo STATE OF NIINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Its: Treasurer /Secretary The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ' 2013, by Chad J. Thomas, the Treasurer /Secretary of Edina Business Plaza, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company,. on behalf of said company, Grantor. NOTARY PUBLIC 16so77v2 4 GRANTEE: CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651 -452 -5000 RNK/cjh 168077v2 5 EXHIBIT "A" Parcel 10 Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Edina Office Center 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT "B" Easement Descriptions: A permanent sidewalk and utility easement over, under, and across Lot 2, Block 1, Edina Office Center 2nd Addition, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies northerly and westerly of Hennepin County permanent highway easement line as described in document numbers 2043023 and 2043023 and easterly and southerly of Line A to be hereinafter described: Commencing at the most southerly southwesterly corner of said Lot 2; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 52 seconds East, assumed bearing along the south line'thereof, 69.60 feet to the point of beginning of said Line A, thence North 01 degrees 55 minutes 44 seconds West, 20.09 feet, thence North 87 degrees 23 minutes 33 seconds East, 47.78 feet; thence easterly along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 1852.00 feet, central angle of 02 degrees 13 minutes 28 seconds, for 71.90 feet; thence North 89 degrees 37 minutes 01 seconds East, tangent to last described curve, 74.20 feet; thence northeasterly along a tangential curve, concave the northwest, having a radius of 48.00 feet, central angle of 90 degrees 22 minutes 21 seconds, for 75.71 feet, thence North 89 degrees 14 minutes 40 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve, 1.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 45 minutes 20 seconds West, 102.39 feet; thence North 02 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, 136.42 feet to said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and there terminating. AND ALSO A temporary construction easement across said Lot 2, which lies northerly and westerly of said Line A and easterly and southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the most southerly southwesterly corner of said Lot 2; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 52 seconds East, assumed bearing along the south line thereof, 61.19 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be hereinafter described; thence North 02 degrees 36 minutes 27 seconds West, 36.69 feet; thence North 87 degrees 23 minutes 33 seconds East, 20.00 feet; thence South 02 degrees 36 minutes 27 seconds East, 15.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 23 minutes 33 seconds East, 36.41 feet; thence easterly along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 1854.00 feet, central angle of 02 degrees 13 minutes 28 seconds for 71.98 feet; thence North 89 degrees 37 minutes 01 seconds East, tangent to last described curve, 74.20 feet; thence northeasterly along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a radius of 46.00 feet, central angle of 90 degrees 22 minutes 21 seconds for 72.56 feet; thence North 00 degrees 45 minutes 20 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 102.48 feet; thence North 02 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East, 136.53 feet; thence South 86 degrees 56 minutes 11 seconds East, 3.00 feet to said Hennepin County permanent highway easement line and there terminating. Said temporary easement shall expire on: December 31, 2013. 1314244.1 168o77v2 6 I To: MAYOR A COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: March 19, 2013 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: None necessary. Information / Background: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. � &S !A � o e 0 Agenda Item #: IX. A. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Susan Howl Dear Rep Erhardt /Senator Franzen & Mayor Hovland, Please read the linked article. This is another major reason why the Dan Patch Corridor being used for commuter rail is so important. While Southwest Light rail is very important it only extends as far as Eden Prairie while the Dan Patch line goes as far as Northfield & Fairbault. Sincerely Andy Brown 5512 Park Place Edina MN 55424 612- 220 -3045 n Mon, 3/4/13, rep. ron .erhardtnhouse.leg.stite.nin.us < rep. roii. erhai -tt ahorrse.lcz.vtale.nrlt.iis> wrote: From: I'CP. ronx chat 'dt(W,) house. leg.statc. ill n.its <rcp. ron. erhardt (n?house.lee.state.nl».us> Subject: 2013 Session Update: February Forecast To: "Announcements From Representative Ron Erhardt" <rep roll erhardt Iistnww3 . house. leg. state. nin.its> Date: Monday, March 4, 2013, 6:35 PM 543 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 651 - 296 -4363 click to unsubscribe Trouble viewing this page? Visit uS online Minnesota House of Representatives Rep. Ron Erhardt (49A) - Email Newsletter News Items March 4. 201 3 Rep. Erhardt to Host Town Hall Meeting Saturday, February 23. 2013 - (Posted: Feb 8 2013 Dear neighbors, 4:47PM) Statement on Governor Dayton's State of the State Last week, Minnesota Management and Budget released Address - (Posted: Feb 6 2013 the February economic forecast. The February budget 8:26PM) forecast shows a projected budget deficit of $627 p .1 g T STATE REP. S LEGISLATIVE SWORN -IN AS LEGISLATIVE million for fiscal years 2014 -15. This is an SESSION BEGINS - (Posted: improvement of $463 million 11'oin the November Jan 92013 11:37AM) budget forecast that showed a projected deficit of $1.1 billion. E -mail: rep. ron.erhardI CCD house. mn Fiscal year 2012 -13 is now projected to have a positive Archived News Items Legislative Assistant: balance of $295 million. Current law directs $290 million to Subscribe to RSS News Lily Schultze 651 - 296 -7167 hay back the K -12 school shifts, leaving a balance of $801 Feeds !F`i million that is still owed to the schools. Read more about RSS. Committee Assignments: Audio & Video Chair: Transportation Policy The econonlic forecast shows that Minnesota is moving Capital Investment in the right direction. We are seeing employment Rules and Legislative Audio Commentary Administration growth and job recovery that is ahead of the RSS Audio Commentary Taxes nation. Minnesota is projected to reach pre - recession odcast Transportation Finance levels of employment by the end of 'tile year. Informational interview Biographical Information: Home: Edina " 4214 Sunnyside Unfortunately, we still have a very large budget deficit Road, 55424; 952 - 927 -9437 to solve. Over the last ten years, Minnesota has Occupation: Financial planner experienced eight budget deficits and is in a cycle of Education: B.A., psychology, B.B.A., general business, having a budget deficit year after year. We have a University of Minnesota, Twin unique opportunity at this point to correct our finances Cities 1990 and to set our state on stable financial footing into the Term: 10th (non - consecutive) future. Family: Single Please contact isle with your input as we work to put Prefers interim mail at this forth a responsible balanced budget. I appreciate address. hearing From Edina residents. I can be reached by phone at 651 -296 -4363 or by entail at re ).ron.erhard1. ir4house.nlll. Sincerely. Ron Erhardt State Representative, Edina click to unsubscribe Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:38 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FVV: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Suzanne Knelman (mailto:sueknelman @aol.coml Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 12:41 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I realize you are very busy but do you think you could direct the city manager to send me the Edina Code of Ethics and other pertinent documents I requested before the meeting tomorrow. I would also appreciate, when it is available, the city attorney's decision on the issue of council member Sprague's potential conflict of interest vote on the variance of 5801 crescent Terrace. I have yet to hear back from member Sprague an official response to the questions I raised. Do you know when he might be sending an official response to my four questions. Thank you, Suzanne Knelman Sent from my Suzanne Jane Timm From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:54 PM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Pollution =' Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoaOEdinaMN.gov l YA-m. Edina MN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families �4. Doing Business From: innaci(&aol.com [mailto:innaci(a)aol.coml Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:45 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Pollution Attn: Mayor, City Manager and Council Members Re: Concentrated flight pattern over Edina neighborhoods What a relief last Saturday. Sunday and even yesterday, March 4 ... no constant airplane noise and air quality pollution over south west Edina - 62 Crosstown south to 494. Highway 100 west to Tracy Last week most days, starting after 6 am, it seemed there were flights roaring every five to eight minutes apart each morning; some flights after 11 pm in the evening. And one at 2.21 AM!. Was very disturbing... the almost constant roar. Noisy inside with the windows closed; one can only imagine how much greater the noise and air pollution in summer with windows open or being outside in garden, on deck or patio, along a walking or bike path. What ways are there to measure detrimental /continual airplane noise levels and adverse air pollution on people because of a concentrated flight pattern? I would hope that common health sense and quality of life for people on the ground are taken into consideration. Inna K. Hays 5857 Creek Valley Road Edina 55439 952.941.3795 Susan Howl Subject: Edina Swim Club FW: Celebrating the Success of the Weekend TO: Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council Members, I thought you might enjoy reading a short recap (below) of the highly successful Minnesota Regional Championship meet hosted by Edina Swim Club at the Southview pool over the weekend. 730 swimmers ages 6 — 18 from multiple clubs across the metro area participated throughout the weekend. Edina Swim Club had 150 swimmers participate. We had many positive comments not only from Edina Swim Club parents but also the competitor team parents and - coaches about how well run the meet was. ' One mom purchasing a meet program told me "Edina — you guys always get it right ". We are very proud of our coaches and athletes, and proud to represent the Edina community in such a positive way. Thank you for your continued support of the Edina Swim Club. Best regards, Cyd Perszyk President, Edina Swim Club Board From: notifications(&edinaswim.com [ mailto :notifications(u)edinaswim.coml On Behalf Of Denise Coach Carlson Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 8:30 AM To: Duane & Cyd Perszyk Cc: Cyd Perszyk Subject: Celebrating the Success of the Weekend Edina Swim Club From Coach Jeff, Coach Denise and the Edina Swim Club Coaches: Celebration of Success- What an outstanding weekend of swimming for the Edina Swim Club. Our parents, swimmers and coaches hosted the first of the new format of Championship Meets -the Minnesota Regional Championship. It was a big success on all fronts, and the coaches are grateful for the all the volunteers who put on this event, and created an environment for swimmers to have a fun, competitive championship meet. Thank you to all. Edina Swim Club came away with an overwhelming win over all! We had some really great teams included at our site, which provided for lots of furious racing and fast swimming. Not only did we win the meet. we achieved over 90 new Champ times, including the new "Win it/Swim" births into the State Meets. Perhaps the most important statistic is that over 90% of all the individual swimmers from our team were able to score points! Under this new format, it is true that everyone counts, and everyone is counted upon to contribute. It was truly a team effort by all athletes involved and will lead us into the next level of competition, the Senior State and Age Group State Meets with confidence, excitement and lots of team spirit!!! Way to go Gators! Many of the Senior men also participated in the Minnesota State High School League Championships this past weekend as well. Gator men won or were on relays that won 7 of the events in the AA meet, and 1 of the events at the A meet. We want to recognize the many swimmers from various high schools that all come together during the rest of the year to represent the Edina Swim Club- Boys AA- Aaron Greenberg: All American -200 medley relay(lrst -AII time Record), 50 Free(lrst), 100 Free(lrst) Jack Lindell: All American -200 medley relay(2nd), 200 IM(lrst), 100 bk(2nd), 400 Free relay(lrst) Erick Huft: All American -200 medley relay(2nd), 200 Free(3rd), 500 fr(2nd), 400 Free relay(lrst) Brett Weicht: All American -200 medley relay(2nd), 100 fly(7th), 200 Free relay(2nd) Pierce Schultz: All American -200 medley relay(2nd), 200 Free relay(2nd) Noah Lucas: All American -200 Free(lrst -AII time record), 500 Free(lrst -AII time record), 200 Free relay(9th), 400 Free relay(3rd) Nick Wilkerson: 100 Breast(3rd), 200 IM(15th) Matthew Hedman: 200 IM(7th), 500 Free(6th) Sasha Safanov: 200 Free relay(9th), 400 Free relay(3rd) Ben Kaiser: 200 Free relay(9th), 400 Free relay(3rd) Andrew Schlais: 200 Free relay(9th), 400 Free relay(3rd) Miles Tracey: 200 Medley relay(16th) Boys A- Humphrey Pruett: 200 Medley Relay(lrst), 200 IM(5th), 100 Breast(3rd) Zach Litwin: 200 Medley Relay(2nd), 200 IM(7th), 100 Breast(5th) Mohab Eid: 200 Free(6th), 100 Free(11th), 400 Free relay(4th) Alex Roe: 50 Free(14th) Other Participants: Gunnar Swanson, Nick Hedman, Sam Khodursky, Jacob Totall The Senior State Meet begins on Thursday 3/7 at the University of Minnesota. We are looking forward to more outstanding swims and great team spirit!! The Age Group State Meet begins next Thursday, 3114 in Rochester. Both meets are going to be very excing and we can not wait to share the victories with the whole team!! Go Gators! Edina Coaches Jane Timm From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:19 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(ZDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: LOIS RING [mailto:llydesignsCalmsn.com] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 3:19 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Michael Frey; Barbara La Valleur Subject: For: Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Re: Include Public Art in new Edina projects I recently watched the Planning Commission meeting re the Byerly's Apartment project. It occurs to me since I am the retired Chair of Edina Public Art Committee that it is an opportune time to discuss with the developer of this project as well as the Southdale Apartment project to include funding for public art, namely a sculpture. The Byerly's project which borders the Promenade is most fitting. Please give this consideration in how you can encourage involvement by these developers with the community to include public art. EPAC has the lists of sculptors to assist in the selection of an artist. Thank you, Lois Ring Jane Timm From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:02 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: My Concerns About Slavery X Lynette Biunno, Receptionist _ 952 - 927 -8861 i Fax 952 -826 -0389 IbiunnoCcDEdinaMN.gov I vnvw.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living- 1- rar11619, Rai-illg Fiimilicti :' DOin� liu:inr,.'. From: Slavery Footprint jmailto: no- repllyCdslave[yfootprint.orgj Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 8:27 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: My Concerns About Slavery Dear James Hovland, i want to see an end to modern -day slavery, a crime that continues today and is present ever here in our city. I respectfully ask that you help make our city a leader in the Fight to end slavery. The first place to start is to ensure that our law enforcement are trained to identify victims of trafficking. Once victims of trafficking have been identified, we need a system in place that ensures the safety and rehabilitation of victims. Our law enforcement should be equipped to conduct proactive, victim- centered trafficking investigations and be prepared to help with the prosecution of trafficking crimes. I respectfully ask that you allocate funding in your budget for training of law enforcement. At a nlininluril, i want our police department to have one officer trained as a point- person for cases of human trafficking and slavery. Victims ofhunlan trafficking face a horrific life in which they are threatened, beaten, raped, starved, locked up, or psychologically manipulated - all for the financial profit of human traffickers. I urge you to help us in this fight. To notify voters in our area about what your adilliilistration is doing to protect the victims of human trafficking in our city and to prosecute those who perpetrate this crime, please e -mail a copy of an open letter or statement on the issue to: nlvcitynslaveryfootprint.org. Sincerely, Charity Woods charitylatte.h(c�gnlail.conl Jane Timm From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8:12 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: HF 1044/SF927: comprehensive funding bill for transit, bicycling, walking, & ADA compliance Attachments: Transit FactSheetwCoalition.pdf Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnora?EdinaMN.gov I vmw. Edina MN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raisin; Familie, & Doing; Business From: Barb Thoman [ mai Ito: barbt(&ticminnesota.org] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 5:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: FW: HF 1044/SF927: comprehensive funding bill for transit, bicycling, walking, & ADA compliance Hello Mayor Hoveland, I am in touch today to make sure you know about important legislation at the Capitol this session and the broad -based coalition that supports it. I would also like to ask for your support. The Transit for a Stronger Economy Coalition, with more 45 organizations -- including unions, developers, people with disabilities, low- income and underserved communities, and active transportation, health, and environmental interests -- is advocating for passage this legislative session of a bill (HF 1044/SF 927) that would expand transit, including bus and rail, fund bicycle and walking projects, and speed up compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the metropolitan region. This bill also substantially expands funding for transit in Greater Minnesota. The Transit for a Stronger Economy bill, authored by Senator Bobby Joe Champion and Representative Melissa Hortman, calls for an additional $300 million per year in the metro and $32 million in Greater Minnesota for transit. This bill is an historic opportunity to build out the transit system in 15 years not 30 or more. It will create more than 30,000 jobs and greatly expand access to jobs (including an additional 45,000 to 55,000 jobs accessible to the region's low- income neighborhoods). Working families, students, and seniors can't afford to wait. Our region and state can't afford to fall farther behind. We need your support! Please join us at the House hearing, Wednesday, March 20, 6:00 -7:30 pm in the State Office Building (Rm 10). Find out more about the campaign on our web site (www.transit4mn.org). Please "like" and "share" our Facebook page among your networks: Facebook.com /Transit for a Stronger Economy. Our Twitter hashtag is >ttransit4mn. The Governor's budget significantly advances funding for metro area transit (bus and rail). The Transit for a Stronger Economy bill is more comprehensive; it expands transit investment statewide and includes a critical local return that will allow metro counties and cities to prioritize investments to provide safer and more convenient options for bicycling, walking, ADA compliance and local transit, such as streetcars or circulators. We look forward to working with you as we create a 21st century transportation system in Minnesota! Working families, seniors, students, long -time Minnesotans and new residents need this nowl Barb Thoman, Executive Director Transit for Livable Communities I Bike Walk Twin Cities Desk: 651 - 789 -1405 1 Cell: 651 - 500 -5958 barbt(mticminnesota.ors www.ticminnesota.orQ I www.bikewalktwincities.orp TRANSIT ECONOMY What is the focus of this campaign? To build out the metropolitan region's transit system in fifteen years, not forty and greatly expand transit in Greater Minnesota This initiative will: • Create jobs (30,000+ for construction) • Give workers affordable options for getting to their jobs • Reduce future costs for roads and auto expenses • Complement the existing comprehensive highway system and ease traffic delays for all commuters The build -out includes transitways (light rail and bus rapid transit), better bus service (rapid bus and expanded hours and frequency), and local needs (bicycling/walking, ADA compliance for people with disabilities, local transit improvements). Cost: $300 million /year in the metro and $32 million /year in Greater Minnesota. What specifically would $300m /yr buy in the metro, and $32m /yr in Greater Minnesota? BUS ($125 million)— expand and upgrade service LRT /BRT /Rail ($125 million) — build -out the • High - amenity "rapid bus" service on 12 regional system of transitways, including Bus Rapid Transit high - frequency routes • 3 more light rail transit (LRT) lines, • Higher frequency, faster bus service to more locations, with longer service including Southwest, Bottineau, and hours an east-metro LRT line • Better shelters, lighting, and technology • Keep fares affordable LOCAL NEEDS ($50 million) —funds to cities and counties • Sidewalks, bicycle routes, and ADA compliance projects • Local transit improvements What happens if we do nothing? • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) with dedicated lanes on 4 more highway corridors • Related rail investments GREATER MINNESOTA ($32 million) • 250 more bus routes across 64 operating systems to meet needs in existing systems and add service in counties and communities currently without transit service. Evening and weekend service in key areas • Progress on the build -out of a regional transit system stops. • Minnesota would fall farther behind competing regions in attracting and keeping jobs. • No expansion of bus service. We have a very efficient, highly -rated bus system, but currently only 1/4 of metro -area residents live close to convenient service (within 1/4 mile of service that operates at least every half- hour). • Very limited funds for local needs for bicycling /walking, ADA compliance, and local transit investments For more information, visit www.transit4mn.org Transit for a Stronger Economy coalition: Advocating Change Together (ACT) African Career, Education & Resource, Inc. AFL -CIO AFSCME Council 5 Alliance for Metropolitan Stability Alliance for Sustainability Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1005 American Heart Association American Lung Association in Minnesota Asian Economic Development Association Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota BlueGreen Alliance CWA Minnesota State Council Conservation Minnesota The Cornerstone Group Cycles for Change Envision Minnesota Episcopal Homes of Minnesota Fresh Energy Growth & Justice Hope Community ISAIAH Jewish Community Action Local Initiatives Support Corporation Twin Cities Masjid An -Nur Minneapolis Bicycle Coalition Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Minnesota Environmental Partnership Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (MPIRG) Minnesota Public Transit Association Minnesota State Building & Construction Trades Council Minnesota Young Professionals Environmental Group Minnesotans for Healthy Kids Coalition MN350 National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Upper Midwest New American Academy Nice Ride Minnesota Project for Pride in Living Saint Paul Bicycle Coalition SEW Minnesota State Council Sheet Metal Workers Local 410 Sierra Club North Star Chapter Transit for Livable Communities United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) 1189 United Transportation Union YEA! MN, a program of the Will Steger Foundation TWIN CITI ES- REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN ANOKA f r.UNDED UNFUNDED Light Rail i .,.:-...-. Rapid Bu: �j'ie Gro, LRi/BRT (mode TBO) ,i �, Rapid RusiStreetcar Highvray Bus I a * INTERCHANGE 3 , �:•:.L;r�;S - SAINT E- . :a Y• PAUL HENNEPIN- - °w :' DEPOT WASHINGTON r rry Al il 0!-, Al eeYtr' ® ::IRf °dill .;tp- - 1.iutnr.tanl,, r �.t Aaplr••dbnd r i 19Q GM �.. Mr u :} MEMNON- le is �r ` ry a RAMSEY, I,.. MINNEAPOLIS '� 4 a * INTERCHANGE 3 , �:•:.L;r�;S - SAINT E- . :a Y• PAUL HENNEPIN- - °w :' DEPOT WASHINGTON r rry Al il 0!-, Al eeYtr' ® ::IRf °dill .;tp- - 1.iutnr.tanl,, r �.t ` r CARVER Hen prairie - " DAKOTA �. - SCOTT ::, • ,.:. ;. C,; . ii• hn s d•' fined on'th n�3,�,a: ?::, .,n•oua S ii -5 <t 1 u11:1 -nn .a au:,,�, Fl - !i t ._ .. :....y.- t 5tra.u. cr C.orvnn. [;l,lliuun I'•CI: �:tl,_. `:J. t::l'..IL f.: a_ f .. Jane Timm From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:50 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Street Improvement Districts Bill Up on Wednesday [We need your help] Lynette Eliunno, Receptionist i I(;1 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 I Ibiunno(@EdinaMN.gov I vnvw.EdinaMN.go v 4..J. ...Far Living:. 1- yarning, Raisin; Families & Doing Ru:invss From: Cederholm, Heather [mailto:hcederholm @Imc.orgl Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:40 PM Cc: Finn, Anne; Ziegler, Laura Subject: Street Improvement Districts Bill Up on Wednesday [We need your help) You are being contacted because your representative serves on the House Transportation Policy Committee which will hear legislation Tomorrow, Wednesday, March 13 at 6 p.m. that would enable cities to establish street improvement districts. We need your help in contacting your legislators before that hearing! Bottom Line Cities support HF 745 (Erhardt, DFL- Edina) and SF 607 (Carlson, DFL- Eagan), legislation that would allow cities to create street improvement districts. This authority would allow cities to collect fees from property owners within a district to fund municipal street maintenance, construction, reconstruction, and facility upgrades. If enacted, this legislation would provide cities with an additional tool to build and maintain city streets. Please share the following information with your legislators. • This is enabling legislation. No city would be required to create a municipal street improvement district. • The street improvement district authority legislation is modeled after Minn. Stat. 435.44, which allows cities to establish sidewalk improvement districts. • This authority would provide a funding mechanism that is fair. It establishes a clear relationship between who pays fees and where projects occur, but stops short of the benefit test that sometimes makes special assessments vulnerable to legal challenges. It also does not prohibit cities from collecting fees from tax exempt properties within a district. • This tool allows cities to perform maintenance and reconstruction on schedule. Timely maintenance is essential to preserving streets and thereby protecting taxpayer investments. • This tool would allow property owners to fund expensive projects by paying relatively small fees over time. The tool could be used to mitigate or eliminate the need for special assessments. For more information, access the related article from the Third Reading on the League's website. Download talking points online (pdf). We need your help! Contact your representative(s) on the House Transportation Policy Committee by 6 p.m. on Wednesday, March 13 to share support with the points listed above. If you are able, please contact your senator also; this piece of legislation is moving through both chambers quickly. Thank you for your help in advocating for cities —your stories and contact with representatives really does matter! If you get feedback from your legislator that you'd be willing to share, or if you have questions on this initiative, please contact Anne Finn (651) 281 -1263 or afinn@Imc.ors 3/i3/i3 0 Thoto 6y Lois Ring C¢ntenniafLakes Tark E4na, NX Jane Timm From: Susan Howl Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:23 AM To: Jane Timm Cc: Ariel Klugman Subject: FW: Lunds /Byerlys development plan on France Susan Howl, Executive Assistant 952 - 826 -0403 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0390 showIpEdinaMN.nov I w<vw.EdinaMN.gov —, ...For Living, L earning, Raisin.- Families & Doing Business From: Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:21 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Lunds /Byerlys development plan on France Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnot7g EdinaMN.gov I vnvw.EdinaMN.gov ...h)r Living. Learning;, Raising Families :` Doing Ru;inc:,� From: Marie Sullivan fmailto :mariesullivan870gmail.comI Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:28 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Edina Mail; ionibennettl2Cd)comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; ann swenson; Scott Neal Subject: Lunds /Byerlys development plan on France Dear Edina Official, i have recently read an article about the proposed development on France Avenue at the current 13yerly's store site. There are 3 very important'issues I hope you will examine very carefully before allowing this development. First, have you thoroughly discussed this with school district officials? We know that housing intended for retired people cannot legally exclude families with school aged children and 1 know that Cornelia grade school, Southview Middle School, as well as the 1 -ligh School are beyond functional capacity as it is!!!! Before we add more housing we better think long and hard about how to fit more children into our schools without even more overcrowding. We don't want to mess with our schools reputation or that will significantly lower housing values. The second issue is the water table. .1 remember not too long ago there was great concern that the aquifer supplying south Edina and parts of Bloomington was low and at risk. Adding more housing will contribute to this problem, and though it may not be seen as a current problem this particular year, a long term study must be considered. "Third, 1 remember hearing that new construction on the west side ol' France was not to exceed 4 -6 stories so as not to infringe on the private. SUbUrban homes in the neighborhood. The East side of France is not Car enough away from the neighborhood to allow any higher than that and 1 understand the 13yerlys project is to allow 7 stories. I believe this will negatively impact the Cornelia neighborhood and we should require the height to be lower than proposed. 1 believe the proposed height will negatively impact housing values in my neighborhood and the current homeowners in this area need to be able to voice their opposition to it. Have they been notified of the plan so they can do so? For all 3 of these issues, long term studies need to be carried out and seriously considered in order to secure future quality of living in 0111• city. Again, thank you for listening. Sincerely, Marie Sullivan MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL February 12, 2013 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. ll. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Deeds, Segreto, Cella, Steel, Gieseke, Jacobson, Jones, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Deeds, Segreto, Cella, Steel, Gieseke, Jacobson, Jones, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of Tuesday, January 8, 2013 Ayes: Members Deeds, Segreto, Cella, Steel, Gieseke, Jacobson, Jones, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None Vl. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Edible Playground Public Hearing — Lewis Park Member Segreto commented, as she read through the letters, a lot of them felt the location selected was not a sunny location. Kristin Aarsvold, Recreation Supervisor, indicated she will talk with Bob Prestrud, Parks Foreman, because that was one of the areas he suggested and thought it would get enough sunlight. She thinks they can move it a little bit in order to get more sunlight. Member Jones stated that if they do decide to move ahead with this she would like to make sure that is part of the condition that the location get at least 8 hours of sunlight. Member Deeds suggested maybe putting up some netting for the soccer balls. Ms. Aarsvold replied they will look into that and as problems arise they will be looking at some problem solving. Member Hulbert asked how close it is to the soccer fields because they may no longer be resting a field so there will be a lot more activity. Ms. Aarsvold replied Mr. Prestrud didn't feel they would have any issues with soccer and they will go out again in the spring to make sure they are meeting the requirement of 8 hours of sunlight and will then give the exact location. Ms. Kattreh added she did talk to the Edina Soccer Club and they had no concerns in that area. Member Jones indicated this is going to cost quite a bit of money and knows that a grant has been requested as well as some pledges have been obtained but because they can't pull $11,000 out of the air she would like to at least set a stipulation that all of the pledges and grants be obtained before anything is started. Ms. Aarsvold replied absolutely and in her timeline it states they will not do 1 anything until those funds are secured in an account that the City has designated for the edible playground. Member Jones indicated that in the past they had talked about using the irrigation system of the soccer field to spray onto the garden and she is concerned because they are looking at putting in a wood fence. It seems like this would be a recipe for it to rot at an earlier age than it would need to and wondered if there was another plan for that. Ms. Aarsvold replied that she will be going to a "School Yard Garden Workshop" on February 22 at the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum so she is learning as she goes and they will need to come up with a Plan B on how they will get water out to the site. She stated she has no problem letting 30 children carry buckets of water from a park building because part of this is the effort the kids are putting into it and they could possibly run a hose and make it a fun activity; however, the main purpose is for them to have fun and hopefully produce some good, healthy food. Member Jones asked if the edible garden will be locked to which Ms. Aarsvold replied yes, they will have a padlock on both the shed and front gate. Member Jones asked so they are not envisioning this to be open at all to the community to which Ms. Aarsvold explained it's really designed for the kids who are registered in the playground program and their families. She noted they did discuss there may be an opportunity to do a "realtor" type box where they could have a key if a family wanted to come. She also stated she is going to plan a few nights where the kids can come with their families to an open house type thing. Member Jones asked if the school type gardens are locked during the off hours to Which Ms. Aarsvold replied she doesn't know. Member Jones indicated that she is a little reluctant because the rest of their parks while they may be scheduled at certain times the rest of the time they are open to the community. She stated she is a little uncomfortable with it being only offered to only 30 kids and not having it available or open any other time. Ms. Aarsvold replied she knows that Eden Prairie does lock their garden mainly as a deterrent to keep out vandals, etc. She noted that a school yard garden is designated for kids who attend that certain school and that they did look at it as a programming opportunity for the kids who attend Lewis Park; however, anyone who lives in Edina can register for the playground program at Lewis Park. She explained they are hoping that it becomes a unique way for them to build a little program at Lewis so for kids who like gardening will say they want sign for the playground program at Lewis Park. Member Jones commented that she thought she saw somewhere that they were going to target certain students to be participants and asked is it going to be open and accessible to all students to which Ms. Aarsvold replied absolutely. Member Jones asked they are not going to be giving preferential treatment to anyone to which Ms. Aarsvold replied no. Ms. Aarsvold explained they can take 75 kids at the Lewis Park site and typically they get around 30 who sign up and this location has never filled. She noted that she will be marketing to the kids who live in the Oaklawn Apartments in that they will have a flyer in their lobby to let them know this is happening. In addition, she will be working with the Creek Valley ELL teacher to get some information out to those students; however, anyone is more than welcome to sign up. She noted that there will also be three camps offered in August that anyone can register for. Member Deeds pointed out that he actually doesn't see this any different than when they lock the locker rooms at Braemar Arena. In fact, we probably have a lot of facilities that we lock up and are only used for specific sports teams or specific undertakings that are not directly open to the public. He stated this is a small space; they are not taking up a large chunk of the park so he doesn't think it changes the way in which they operate and doesn't see that as a particular concern. 2 Member Jones noted that in looking at the drawings if a soccer ball were to go in there would we need to lock it up because there will be more damage done trying to climb over the fence than just leaving it open. She added they are really not keeping out any vandals with locking a 4 foot high fence. Ms. Aarsvold responded she is open to leaving it unlocked if the Park Board is open to leaving it unlocked. She noted that is something she will ask about at the workshop she will be attending. Member Jacobson commented another good- reason to lock it would be to prevent the deer and other animals from coming in it. Ms. Aarsvold replied she will also talk with Mr. Prestrud and see what he would suggest. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Cella, to approve the edible garden in Lewis Park. Member Jones reiterated the conditions that there be eight hours of sunlight during the summer and all funding is secured as stated in the document. Ayes: Members Deeds, Segreto, Cella, Steel, Gieseke, Jacobson, Jones, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried VI.A. Yorktown Park Pilot Community Garden Rules and Policies — Ms. Faus informed the Park Board their initial step in coming up with these rules and policies was to assemble a working group and.their first step in defining the rules and policies was to do some research and find out what other cities have adopted for policies and rules. In addition, they contacted the "MRPA" as well as "Resource Gardening Matters ". She noted after they collected the information and spent some time looking through all of the different rules and policies the other cities have developed they created that chart. She indicated they presented a draft of these rules and policies to the community garden working group at the January 30 meeting. They provided some great suggestions, additions and changes and are now looking for Park Board's approval of the rules and policies for the Yorktown Community Garden Pilot project. Member Deeds asked is this set up as essentially organic produce and the rules are such to which Ms. Faus replied that is correct. Member Segreto indicated under number two of the regulations it states that returning gardeners will be given first preference the following year and asked if that is what they have found in their research or do some cities do it by a lottery. Ms. Faus replied some cities do use a lottery but the majority of the cities did it by priority where if you had a garden one year the next year you were given priority. She added that they certainly could look at doing a lottery system for the following year. Member Segreto stated that may be a decision to make after you gauge what the interest in the garden is and asked how many plots will there be.. Ms. Faus replied they are starting out with approximately 50 plots and that the nice thing about the location they are selecting is there could possibly be room for expansion if they find the gardens are extremely popular. Member Cella indicated that also is the only regulation that struck her as something she would question. She stated they should agree to revisit that at the end of this gardening season to see what the demand for those plots were because she would hate to see people who know nothing about it at the start and then would not be able to have one because of others who were able to get them first would always have those plots. Member Jones commented that she thinks one of the reasons some community gardens do it by priority is because there becomes an active group community that takes care of the garden and in order for that to happen there usually is some type of legacy and things like that. She stated she would 3 suggest in that section, whether they are going to use a lottery or not, to keep the stipulation that would be giving priority to former garden plot holders; however, if their garden had not been maintained they would lose their priority. Member Deeds stated that he would like to see approximately a 50% turnover every year. He indicated it's really a question to review these after the second year to see what kind of turnover they are getting or are they getting locked up. It's an empirical question and until they run it they won't know. Ms. Faus pointed out when they were putting the rules and regulations together they realized they may have to make some changes next year and that it's going to be trial and error so they will take some great notes and make sure they are ready to make certain changes needed for the following year. Member Jones asked if they have any idea how many Edina residents will actually sign up for this to which Ms. Kattreh replied they haven't had the opportunity to actually do a survey but that the gardens will be open to Edina residents first and they will not open them up to non - residents unless they have extra space available after a certain date. She noted they were given this project in December so they haven't had an opportunity to gauge interest; however, based on the information they've seen from their neighboring communities they are popular and do fill up. Member Deeds asked about raised beds to which Ms. Faus replied they decided to not offer raised beds this year just because of their time and financial constraints but certainly will look at adding those in phase two next year. Member Kathryn Peterson commented just a consideration on the waiver it references "my child" and she is not sure that this is necessarily a program geared for children so you may want to consider changing it to say "my family ". Member Jones pointed out that in the garden plots she is familiar with they do not allow hoses . because of the amount of water than can be wasted; therefore, she would recommend that they don't allow the use of hoses especially since they will be bringing in water with their water buffalo. Ms. Kattreh commented that is a discussion they have been going back and forth on and they are very interested in Park Board's input. She noted it is something they will certainly be talking about further with the working group and they've gone both ways because that was exactly their concern. She stated they don't want to create a hardship for people to have to carry water long distances so they are certainly open to any suggestions. Member Deeds asked is there a reason for no pets to which Ms. Faus replied the cities that have a community garden all have a no pet policy but she does not know the exact reason why, possibly out of respect for the other gardeners. Member Jacobson suggested maybe they should be more specific about the language regarding pets in that they are allowed in the general area but not in the planting area because then it would be about waste and food and not having the two mix. Member Jones asked Ms. Kattreh if she is proposing they are going to talk about rules and regulations further in the working group. Ms. Kattreh replied they are asking for approval of the rules and regulations tonight so if there are any changes anyone would like to see made they could certainly do that. She commented in their meeting in January they handed out the rules and they asked for people to submit any changes to them to which those changes have already been incorporated into the rules. Member Jones stated that she would like to add "If weeds are growing 12" tall on more than 1/3 of your plot or if you've extended your plot beyond the assigned boundary lines you will be contacted by the park district by.phone or email. You will need to respond to this communication. Gardeners will then have two weeks from the day we notify you to take the appropriate action before the plot will be 4 mowed. You're expected to maintain your plot during any extended absences ". She noted this — — — specifies the process and it is the weeds that make it such an eyesore which is also why she suggests this. Ms. Faus.pointed out that in addition to the rules and regulations they are also working on an application form which lists gardener expectations and that would be another area where they could include the specific part about the weeds. Member Jones noted that in general she agrees with what was laid out; however, since they want to welcome people to the gardens maybe there is a way that they could word it to make it friendlier as well as more welcoming and encouraging. She noted when people are signing up for a garden plot they want it to be a fun experience and feels it could be worded a little bit differently. Chair Steel asked if there will be any resources for first time planters to which Ms. Faus replied yes, there will be some master gardeners to work with the people and they are also hoping to have a master gardener available on certain nights for people who may want further advice. Chair Steel asked if an issue comes up in July that we didn't anticipate how that will be approached. Ms. Kattreh replied they are going to be setting up a gardeners committee that will have a staff representative as well as a smaller representation of the working group that will include some actual gardeners in the community garden. This group will help to mediate any issues they may have. Member Jones asked will this area be locked to which Ms. Faus replied they hadn't planned on locking the area. Members Jones asked what the difference is between this garden and the garden at Lewis Park. Member Hulbert replied it isn't close to a general field area and there are not going to be soccer balls flying around. Member Cella pointed out this is designated as a community garden; the other garden at Lewis Park is part of the playground program where you sign up to participate in it with a fee so for example instead of signing up for a soccer camp they are signing up for a garden camp. She noted her understanding is kids are there gardening under the supervision of park personnel where with the community garden anyone who has a plot can come in when they feel like gardening. Ms. Kattreh replied that she would totally concur; both programs are considered to be pilot programs and they are doing their best to utilize the great resources they have in terms of people on their working group as well as the resources they've been able to collect through MRPA. She stated they will be reviewing this constantly and will be prepared to make any changes to make it a successful experience for all participants. Member Hulbert noted that one of the rules states that priority is given to Edina residents but thinks there may be an education curve for residents who don't know that a community garden exists. He indicated that if it takes a little while for this to fill up and only 25 residents step up the first year and then residents from other communities come in he would still like to see that subsequent years Edina residents will have some sort of precedence over plots versus other community residents. Ms. Faus replied what they anticipate doing next year is having a registration period probably in January made available first to previous gardeners as well as Edina residents and if there are still plots available the following month open it up to non - residents. Member Jacobson asked should the non - resident fee be higher than the resident fee to which Ms. Faus replied in their research they did not find that.other cities offered different rates for residents and non - residents. She added some cities only made the garden available for residents and is something that could be a possibility. Member Gieseke asked do non - residents retain the right as returning gardeners to keep their plot year after year. Ms. Faus replied that her initial answer would be no because even though they were a previous gardener Edina residents would have first priority and that may need to be specified more in the rules. Member Deeds suggested that they list the priorities: priority #1 is for returning gardeners who are Edina residents; priority #2 is for Edina residents; priority #3 is for returning non -Edina residents, etc., so that everybody understands the priorities. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to approve the proposed Yorktown Park Community Garden Rules and Policies Member Cella stated some of the suggestions that have been made and everyone has agreed to be appropriate should be incorporated into the rules and procedures on the final document. Ayes: Members Deeds, Segreto, Cella, Steel, Gieseke, Jacobson, Jones, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried VI.C. Yorktown Park Pilot Community Garden Parking Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board as she mentioned before they have a very aggressive timeline to get this project done by the middle of May. She noted in looking at the timeline they had February 1 as a goal to have their rules and policies set and noted they are working on location and parking. She indicated the next big thing for the Park Board will be to hold a public hearing at the next Park Board meeting. She indicated they are finalizing a site plan with the Engineering Department and hope to have a mailing out the beginning of next week to notify neighbors within 1,000 feet of the property. She noted if it receives Park Board approval they will take it to the City Council on their April 2 meeting and after that they will start construction. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that in January Ms. Faus and she met with Greg Hanks from the YMCA because they realized that parking is an issue at Yorktown Park. She noted they looked at a couple of options and the first option was to approach the YMCA and see if they might be interested in a shared parking on their back lot. She indicated what came from that meeting was a possible partnership opportunity with the YMCA. She pointed out that the YMCA does run into a lot of parking capacity issues in their lot at a variety of times during the day and during the year and so they did express some concern about using their parking lot for the community garden. She indicated that they talked about the fact that during the summer is when the YMCA is not as busy and is when the community garden would never have more than 10 to 15 cars in the parking lot; however, they still had concern because during the summer is when they run a lot of camp programs and the buses that come out of the back parking lot. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that what was proposed, at least very tentatively in the early stages, was a partnership with the YMCA on creating a parking lot at the very corner of Yorktown Park adjacent to the existing YMCA parking lot. She stated again they are in the very early stages but the YMCA is proposing that they would actually build and maintain that parking lot on Yorktown Park property and give Yorktown Park City of Edina users access to that parking lot year around. She noted that would be two great benefits for the city, one is it would be a dedicated parking lot for the community garden, which they don't have access to parking anywhere else and it would also give them a great opportunity to provide a trailhead parking lot for the Nine Mile Creek Trail which is going to.be just on the very northern edge of the community garden. She stressed that she told the YMCA that it was important she first had this discussion with the Park Board to see if you had any interest in her pursuing this any further. Member Gieseke stated that it looks like it's a reasonable request. His concern is it's shared space so would there be signage that designates certain time periods for use by the community garden in case there is overflow from the current YMCA situation that it fills to capacity. Ms. Kattreh replied they have not taken their conversations to that level yet but. would anticipate they would want to assign certain spots as community garden parking only. N. Member Segreto indicated her concern is right now the community garden is somewhat of an experiment and if they enter into an agreement to build a parking lot and the garden does not succeed then they have a parking lot; however, it could be used for parking in the future for the bike trail which also has some risk involved. She stated she would like to be open to the idea but she doesn't see them judiciously doing it the first year and therefore would like to tell the YMCA it would be good for the City to have a parking lot there but not hinged on this first year. Member Segreto asked about the shared bathroom situation and what will the gardeners do, will they walk into the YMCA and use their bathrooms. Ms. Kattreh replied they did have that discussion and the YMCA is open to that; although it's probably not ideal for them or for the gardeners because of the distance people would need to travel. She noted the YMCA has offered to add a port-a -potty to that area for the community garden. Member Segreto commented that there are some residents who have negative feelings about port-a- potties, especially older residents. Ms. Kattreh responded they certainly have considered the aesthetic concerns of a port-a -potty in that area and if they extend it beyond a pilot program she could see them building some sort of a perimeter shelter around the building to help shield it. Member Cella asked how the green space they are looking at for the garden plots and proposed parking lot is currently being used during the summer. Ms. Kattreh replied that it is not programmed; however, the YMCA used to use it for some of.their athletic programs but no longer use it. She added it is not programmed and receives very little use because of the access and lack of parking. Member Deeds indicated it would solve the permeability problem if they could do a gravel parking lot with some drain the and assorted other things. It solves the water run -off problem, makes.it relatively inexpensive and makes it reversible if necessary. He stated if the demand is there then they can go back and put in some kind of asphalt or preferably some kind of permeable surface. He stated he is actually a little more concerned about the water run -off and the permeability and we need to quit building non - permeable parking lots. Ms. Kattreh pointed out that part of the approval process for a parking lot would require Watershed District approval and they could certainly explore any option the Park Board would be interested in having staff explore. She indicated they do not have a budget for the community garden so they are going to be asking the City Council to allocate some funding for the garden and they certainly do not have money in the budget to even provide a temporary parking lot. She noted she could explore this with the YMCA but she is not sure they would be interested in funding a parking lot that would be used for just the summer because they need a parking lot during the winter as well. She indicated if there are concerns about the viability of.the community garden for a year or two they might be better off putting the garden where they would put it and see if they could work out an arrangement with the YMCA to share their parking lot in the meantime. Member Deeds asked is the community garden viable without a parking lot to which Ms. Kattreh replied no, they definitely need parking in that area. Member Jacobson commented if they do a parking lot with the YMCA parking lot it makes it seem like it's the YMCA's parking lot. She suggested they put a little barrier or somehow separate it in a way so that it doesn't look like it's the YMCA's parking lot. Ms. Kattreh replied they could certainly explore that and noted that during the working group meeting Member Jones asked if there is another way to gain access to that parking lot and there really isn't another viable option. She stated that she understands the concerns but would like to reiterate that she really does feel that it would be a large benefit to the Nine Mile Creek Trail as a drop off point for bikes. Member Deeds commented that the downside risk is essentially they give up a piece of parkland that is essentially unused at this point to which Ms. Kattreh replied that is correct. Member Deeds stated so we give them the land and the YMCA is going to take all of the expenses and build a parking lot, they get additional parking and we get use of a parking lot that may be good for the community garden and may well be really beneficial to Nine Mile Creek down the road. He noted the downside is that never happens and the YMCA gets a parking lot. Member Hulbert stated we are not giving the land away we are just letting them put a parking lot on it. Member Deeds responded there will be a contractual agreement that there will be parking there but the downside risk is we are giving up some land in exchange for to put a parking lot in. Member Gieseke stated that land is essentially not programmed and if they have a parking lot maybe they can utilize it in a different capacity maybe even year around if they want to take advantage of that. He asked Ms. Kattreh if any thought has been given to enhancing the fire station that is there by adding 20 stalls or something like that. Ms. Kattreh replied they have not had that discussion but that they do have some constraints there with the access because there is a bridge with an underpass where the promenade carries through. She noted she would not say that it's not feasible but it would be very difficult with an emergency vehicle access in that area. She added she is not quite sure how it would fit and how the Fire Department would feel about having residential traffic going through the parking lot with their emergency vehicles. Member Jones commented that she doesn't understand why they would want to put in a 40 stall parking lot fora community garden that has 40 plots. She stated she is really opposed to taking up any open space parkland for excessive parking and does not think that serves their community well and doesn't think that is part of the long -term goal for the park district which is to keep open space in parks. She noted maybe they could look into adding parking spaces by the Fire Department and the community garden would be served with far fewer than 40 parking spaces. She pointed out that most people who signed the petition live in the Durham Apartments and those people wouldn't even need parking spaces. She indicated she wants to go very, very slowly on paving over parkland and if the secondary process is to say we need it for a trailhead for Nine Mile Creek there are many places where there is parking near Nine Mile Creek. Member Cella stated that she shares Member Jones concern about paving over green space but if they are committed to putting in a community garden they also need to be committed to provide some place for people who don't live in the Durham Apartments to park. She pointed out if they want to utilize the community garden and they have no space for them to park then it's not worth going ahead with the garden project. They need to somehow make it accessible to as many Edina residents as possible and therefore they have to solve the parking problem. Member Jones replied she is not suggesting that they not solve a parking problem but she doesn't think they need 40 spaces. Chair Steel indicated there are a lot of people who will be using the Nine Mile Creek trail and asked Ms. Kattreh if she could look into other trail heads. Chair Steel commented from her own experience she has seen 10 cars and trailers at the trailhead by Wayzata so she knows they do take up some space and ask if staff could check with other cities that have the Three Rivers Park District trail and get an idea. Ms. Kattreh replied she would be more than happy to do that. Ms. Kattreh explained the 40, spots came from the YMCA and they are looking at making approximately a $70,000 investment in this parking lot so they are going to want to make it to meet their needs as well because we do not need 40 spots for a community garden or trailhead. This is just one opportunity to get a parking lot for the amenity we are proposing. Member Deeds asked if parking were put in is the open space that is there programmable in the sense of putting in an athletic field, what is the current condition of it because maybe the 40 spaces could be useful for that too. Member Hulbert responded the YMCA used to program youth soccer for Pre Kindergarten /Kindergarten so it's a good size for that. Member Gieseke commented they used to have two or three games going on at once. Ms. Kattreh indicated if they had a parking lot it would give them the ability to do some programming there. Member Jones stated that she does think they could use at least 10 spots for the Nine Mile Creek Trail and suggested staff should go back to the YMCA and say can we add on ten spots because that would help them and they can see how it is used this year and if they need more than ten spots they can talk about it next year. Member Gieseke noted that Richfield is right on the border and are also part of the Tri -City Skate Park so they have an interest and maybe it's worthwhile to talk to them about the cul -de -sac that is there and expanding some kind of parking around there even with access from the YMCA Edina side there. He added it may be a more pleasant way to go about this and less green space would be eaten up. He commented he is assuming, because this is adjacent to Richfield, there is going to be some Richfield response to the community garden plus there are some access issues for Richfield for the Tri -city Skate Park. Chair Steel replied she doesn't see Richfield being as open to funding but maybe Three Rivers Park District is. Ms. Kattreh responded she has not had any conversations with Three Rivers Park District at this point. She indicated that given their time constraints she probably won't have the opportunity to explore parking opportunities on any of these other venues. She stated that if the Park Board is not interested in pursuing a parking option with the YMCA right now then she will need to discuss with them the viability of sharing a lot and she is not sure what their answer would be. Member Deeds asked the current utilization of this park is there are no programs scheduled and it's a bunch of grass to which Ms. Kattreh replied it's underutilized. Member Deeds asked so without parking it's going to remain underutilized to which Ms. Kattreh replied that is correct. Member Deeds asked so with parking in conjunction with the YMCA not only does it open up the community gardens but it open ups the potential for other programs and other utilizations to which Ms. Kattreh replied that is correct, yes. Chair Steel stated that the sentiment she is sensing from the Park Board is that we want minimal parking spaces that are the most environmentally friendly, but that we do need parking. Member Hulbert indicated we are committed to doing this community garden and thinks it's going to be successful and a lot of people are going to want to use it and it was his thought that a parking lot would cost them approximately $50,000. He stated if the YMCA wants to step up and pay $70,000 for a parking lot he would like to play ball and doesn't think the YMCA is going to want to give them 10 to 20 stalls for a community garden if the area is not being used. He stated Edina needs more dog parks, more youth small soccer fields, etc., and he doesn't want to look at this and say we just want our 10 stalls because they are not going to want to do it and we are missing an opportunity. Member Jones asked isn't there an elevation change in the area they are talking about for a potential field to which Ms. Kattreh replied in that area the elevation is pretty flat. Member Jones stated speaking for open space that area is really built up and if they are already taking up a quarter of the park for a community garden there are people who do enjoy walking on grassy areas and having a place to throw a Frisbee and there is no other place in this area to do that. Ms. Kattreh commented there is a park adjacent on the eastern side that is in Richfield. Member Jones commented if the park is underutilized it's not very well landscaped and it feels fairly industrialized with that skate park and 9 feels it could use more trees. She stated she doesn't think this is an ideal site for a soccer field and thinks there are other fields that would make it feel better as you're biking or as you're walking around but thinks it is not the most ideal setting for a ball field. Member Hulbert replied kids have played soccer there all of the time and they could ride their bike to the soccer field if it's right on the promenade and it would still have a green space. Member Segreto noted she is sensitive to the open space argument and agrees with Member Jones that 40 spaces seems like a lot but for them to have the garden they need to have parking and thinks they should take the opportunity of a partnership with the YMCA because it's a good opportunity. She commented that she doesn't know what the magic number is for the YMCA to say okay we will do the construction but she suspects that it's not 10 spaces. She added 20 spaces feels better and that it can always be enlarged but maybe that's a good start. Member Hulbert replied she has a feeling they are going to say however many spots we want they are going to want at least that same amount. Member Deeds stated Edina is a dense city with very little space and here they have an underutilized piece of land and it's underutilized because there is no place to park to make use of it. He indicated the YMCA is willing to spend money to put in 40 spots which makes it a useful piece of land for a much broader array whether it's a ball field, Nine Mile Creek Trailhead, skating rink, he doesn't know what is appropriate in there but it makes it a useful space. As it stands right now it is underutilized and not useful space and we need to spend money mowing it. Member Segreto responded if we do this parking lot we are encumbering the land with a long -term easement and shared agreement. She added when they talk about strategic planning this park does not have a strategic plan so we don't know what the fate of this park will be in the future. Chair Steel reiterated to the Park Board that Ms. Kattreh brought this to them to have their first discussion and mull it over and if it is something they are going to want to consider they are not going to be able to pick the magic number that the YMCA will decide on tonight. She asked the Park Board how they would feel if Ms. Kattreh went back to the YMCA and asked them what the best offer is they can give us and then we can take a look'at that. Member Gieseke commented that he agrees with Member Jones in that they don't want to make it too industrial but they do need parking and it makes sense and is reasonable because it's zero expense to the city. He stated he is concerned about the look and asked if they could be greedy and tell them they would like 30 spots instead of 40 as well as ask if they would put some greenery around it to make the park look pretty. Ms. Kattreh replied she would be happy to ask for anything that is suggested. Member Jones indicated on the agenda it says this item is for discussion yet Ms. Kattreh is the one who will be moving forward on this. She asked Ms. Kattreh if there is feedback she would like to hear from each board member to help make the discussion useful so that you are not only hearing from a few members. Ms. Kattreh replied it was difficult for her to'put this on the agenda because they are so early in the stage in that they don't have an offer on the table from the YMCA; therefore, she is having a hard time asking for approval for something because there is no offer for you to approve. She stated that she certainly understands everyone's concern for green space and she shares those concerns. She indicated that in bringing the request for the 40 spots it was based on a request from the YCMA for 40 to 50 spots and she capped it at 40 spots. She stated if the recommendation from the board was to go back and ask for 25 or 30 spots that kind of feedback would be most helpful and yes, it would be helpful to hear from everyone in one way, shape or form. She noted she can be in touch with the board over the next month to let you how it's proceeding. She informed the Park Board that their next phase is the public hearing phase and the approval of the project from the Park Board. She noted at that point if the board is not interested they can talk about taking it out or go back to the YMCA with 10 another revision. She pointed out this project has been made very difficult because of the short time frame they are working on and added that she literally doesn't have two weeks in play to delay the project and wishes they could do it differently. Chair Steel stated that it is hard to come up with a number without knowing what programs we could have in the future; therefore, she thinks it would be helpful to have a few realistic ideas because if they build this parking lot she wants to use the entire park. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board one thing they have not mentioned is they would like to do some programming at the community garden and that they already have some interest from Fairview Southdale Hospital in holding some clinics and gardening activities. She added that she sees this as a community meeting space so, in addition to any possible recreational use of that space; she also sees it as an educational programming site. Member Deeds stated that he would recommend that the Park Board trust Ms. Kattreh and empower her to continue the conversations with the YMCA. He thinks it's reasonable to at least capture this conversation and see what the YMCA is willing to do. He would like to see a motion that simply empowers Ms. Kattreh to continue the conversation and see where it's negotiated out and see what the offer looks like. Member Jones stated she assumes they would be talking about a long -term easement for getting access to that park to which Ms. Kattreh replied absolutely and that the City Attorney will help draw up some long -term agreements for the use of this parking lot. Chair Steel asked if they have enough time to get the public hearing notice out. Ms. Kattreh responded the public hearing notice they have drawn up does include a parking lot and noted they have been working with the Engineering Department to get that ready. She stated they could take it out and use verbiage that the parking lot is subject to change but that is what they are planning unless the Park Board is absolutely not interested in this option. Member Jones stated that to be fair to the residents in the area they need to be very specific about what type and size of a parking lot and garden they are proposing in their neighborhood park. Ms. Kattreh replied they have a parking lot drawn out that right now has 40 spots. Member Cella asked so basically the decision for them right now is do they send the public meeting notice with or without a parking lot. Ms. Kattreh responded that is correct and she absolutely agrees they want to try to make it as accurate as they possibly can and in this case if anything they would error on the side of a larger parking lot. Member Kathryn Peterson indicated she agrees that in order to support the community garden they need parking and they need to take better advantage of this space as mentioned. It's a shame it is not being better used at this point and feels having parking there would support that or some other programming. VI.D. 2013 Park Board Work Plan Schedule Ms. Kattreh reminded the Park Board that at their last meeting she was asked to put together a more detailed calendar to show how they would be able achieve all of the goals they have set for 2013 and is interested in any feedback, comment or changes the Park Board would like to see made. Chair Steel pointed out that she is working with Ms. Kattreh to shepherd the strategic planning process and pulled those items together because she thought that might be a doable timeline; however., she is completely open for suggestions. She noted that at the next Park Board meeting they will start digging into the strategic planning process and hopefully it will become much clearer how that will unfold. 11 Member Hulbert made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to approve the 2013 Park Board Work Plan Schedule. Ayes: Member Deeds, Segreto, Cella, Steel, Gieseke, Jacobson, Jones, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried VI.E. Monarch Way Station at Arneson Acres Park Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that the Garden Club "Late Bloomers" is proposing to add a "Monarch Way Station" at Arneson Acres Park. She stated they think it's going to be a big draw that could actually receive some recognition from the National Monarch Society and added that it will be a native plant garden. Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to approve the Monarch Way Station at Arneson Acres Park. Member Segreto asked if the butterflies are going to be tagged as part of the tracking system because it's really important to know where they are migrating and kids get excited about putting labels on the wings. Ms. Kattreh indicated they had not mentioned that but she will talk to them about it. Ayes: Members Deeds, Segreto, Cella, Steel, Gieseke, Jacobson, Jones, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VII.A. COUNCIL UPDATES Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that Chair Steel has asked that she put together a compilation of City Council agenda items that directly impact Parks and Recreation or the Park Board. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that the City Council did vote 3 -2 to change the residency percentage for the Edina Swim Club to receive priority access to the aquatic center and to be the recognized swimming association in Edina. She noted that it went from 75% to 60% and they are currently working to negotiate with the Edina Swim Club and Aqua Jets to determine an agreeable use of pool time this summer. Member Jones asked for a copy of the new agreement once it's done to which Ms. Kattreh replied the new agreement was actually approved by the City Council in April and she would be more than happy to get her a copy of that. VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Jones thanked staff for all of the work they've done with edible garden and community garden. She noted the community garden meeting was very well put together with respect to all of the paperwork they had for them to look at. Member Jones asked for an update on both dome projects. Ms. Kattreh replied with regards to the golf dome they did receive a preliminary insurance settlement offer from the insurance company but they are still a ways apart. Their goal is to try to finish negotiations by the end of February and be able to take an offer and project plan to the City Council in March, start construction in April and open by November 1 at the latest. She added they are running on a_ very short time frame and they are doing the best that they can to negotiate the very best deal that they can. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board regarding the Sports Dome they are working on compiling the data they have collected from the athletic field users to determine outdoor athletic field needs. She noted it was a 15 to 20 page survey that they sent out to all of their field users asking them for current 12 r field use needs, future field use needs and to really think outside the box not necessarily in the fields they are currently using but what type of space they will need. She stated their goal is to have the data compiled within the next month and will then have a plan ready to submit. Member Deeds asked if there is a timeline on the sports dome to which Ms. Kattreh replied as soon as possible and noted they are working as fast as they can to try to put this data together. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board she is soliciting one or two volunteers to attend a March 19 City Council work session in conjunction with Blue Cross Blue Shield via Do.Town and they will present a "Health in all Policies" for the City. She explained what they would like to do is provide a health lens in evaluating projects to consider healthy and active living components for all projects that we implement in the future. She noted it's a way to sustain the "Do.Town" concept in our daily business decisions. She indicated the Community Health Committee will attend the work session and they are also looking for representatives from Planning, Transportation and Park Board. Member Segreto volunteered to attend the work session. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that she has been approached by a resident interested in turning some of the hockey rinks into off -leash dog areas and asked the Park Board if this is something they would be interested in entertaining either now or in the future. Member Hulbert indicated they discussed doing that two years ago at Creek Valley and it was decided no because kids like to play soccer in those rinks during the summer as well as residents were concerned about the proximity to some of the homes. Member Segreto added there was also the issue with having people come from outside of the community and because it is so close to the school there was a safety factor. She indicated there are hockey rinks located in many different locations and this is not a proposal to use all of them so maybe one or two of them would work. Member Deeds noted they strike him as way too small because it's essentially concentrating a lot of dogs and a lot of what dogs leave behind in a relatively small space and added even large dog parks are a mess. It doesn't seem on the surface as viable. Member Hulbert asked where they are at with the dog park that exists but doesn't exist on 42nd and France Ave.; on the Edina /Minneapolis border. Ms. Kattreh replied that property is owned by the City of Minneapolis and there have been discussions about that site many times over the years. She noted within the last year the City of Minneapolis contacted both St. Louis Park and Edina for a meeting to express a possible interest in selling that property to which they definitely expressed interest in hearing a little bit more but have not heard from them since. She stated they would definitely be open to that if they were approached. Member Segreto stated that she would be open to the possibility of having a dog park on the east side of the City since Van Valkenburg Park is their only dog park and is all the way on the west side of Edina. ,Chair Steel commented she would like to pop into Pamela Park's ice rink for ten minutes so her two small dogs could run around; however, she doesn't want to have policing issues and have this be a formal location type thing. She indicated if there is any opportunity so residents could let their dogs run around for 15 minutes in a little more informal setting than the Van Valkenburg dog park. She noted she sees the Van Valkenburg dog park as more of a destination park, whereas Pamela Park would be you walk through, give your dog a little time to run around on its own and keep going. 13 Member Hulbert pointed out that anytime you talk about having a dog park near homes, which a lot of these hockey rinks are near homes, there is going to be a lot of people in opposition. He noted one possibility where there are no homes for a dog park would be York Park. Member Gieseke indicated we have schools and hockey rinks and certain park facilities in certain areas for a reason. He stated he is a dog lover and owner but you are going to have some noises and other issues and there are reasons why they put dog parks in certain locations. Member Deeds commented that unless there is some limitation you are going to put on it it's not going to be just small dogs, there are going to be big dogs too and that's why he questions the size of the hockey rinks. Chair Steel suggested they could put a limit on the number of dogs that could be in the rink at one time and that would also keep the noise down. Member Jones stated that she thinks this should be an agenda item and also thinks they should limit the number of dogs allowed in at one time. l Member Kathryn Peterson noted that is fine as long as there are very tight parameters and as Member Segreto mentioned we are not talking about all of the parks because there are going to be a number of parks that are by schools and playgrounds and are going to have a number of limiting factors. Therefore, there are probably going to be relatively few hockey rinks that will be suitable. Member Deeds suggested before it becomes an agenda item to find out if there are any rinks that are actually viable given the parameters. Ms. Kattreh replied she would be more than happy to put together a list and they can talk about it at their next meeting. Chair Steel asked Ms. Kattreh to also check with surrounding cities to see if this is something they do. Ms. Kattreh replied the resident who brought this forward did quite a bit of research and found there was one surrounding city that did allow it but it was only at one or two parks. Member Gieseke commented that he would ask to keep an eye towards equal distribution throughout the city; something that would make sense on the east side if there is such a thing. Member Jones asked if staff could also find out what additional maintenance would be needed and how it would work. Ms. Kattreh replied she will put together a list and they can have a brief discussion at their next meeting and decide how they would like to proceed. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. 14 MINUTES Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, February 12, 2013 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Carr and Members Moore, Davis, Curran, Mellom, Johnson, and Good. Absent were Members Anger, Stegner, Christiaansen, and Sussman. Planner Repya being absent, staff was represented by Consultant Robert Vogel. . Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Davis moved to approve the meeting agenda as submitted. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES January 8, 2013 The minutes of the January 8, 2013 meeting were approved as mailed. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None VI. NEW BUSINESS: A. 2013 Heritage Award The board reviewed the rules and application form. A subcommittee consisting of Members Mellom, Good and Johnson was appointed to make the final selection and report back to the HPB at its April meeting B. Planning Activities'for the City's Quasquicentennial Member Moore reported on the preparations being made by the Edina Historical Society to celebrate the 125`h anniversary of the incorporation of Edina. Members discussed ways for the HPB to be actively involved in the quasquicentennial. Consultant Vogel suggested that the board sponsor digitizing the old village council minutes and posting them online. There was also discussion of reproducing old photographs (from the city assessor records) of the houses on one city street, such as Wooddale Avenue, to document the evolution of the streetscape. Ross Davis agreed to investigate and report back to the Board on the feasibility of a Wooddale photo project. 0 ina Heritage Preservation Boar Minutes February 12, 2013 VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Update Status of 203 Work Plan Chair Carr reviewed the 2013 work plan. Progress is being made on the work plan action items. No formal action was taken. B. Update Status of CLG Grant — Mid Century Modern Historic Context Study Consultant Vogel updated the board on the progress of the "Mid Century Modern" project, which is on schedule for completion in July. C. Update — Consultant's 2013 Work Plan (Discretionary Tasks) The board reviewed a memorandum prepared by Consultant Vogel that described and prioritized some "additional discretionary" projects that could be carried out if time and resources become available. No further action was taken. D. Updates from Standing Committees 1. Communication & Education — Video Clip Idea — No Report 2. Research and Landmark Designation of Eligible Edina Properties Member Moore reported that he and Planner Repya had drafted a letter to be sent to owners of properties determined eligible for heritage landmark designation, inviting them to an informational meeting. The date of the informational meeting has not been set. E. Updates from Ad Hoc (Temporary) Committees 1. Southdale Center Preservation There was discussion of the parking lot signs at Southdale Center. Member Moore advised the board that the existing signs were replicas and not originals. Some members felt that the Edina Historical Society should look into acquiring one of the signs for its museum. Member Moore agreed to share that idea with the Historical Society. 2. Sustainability - No Report VIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. Heritage Preservation Board Reference Booklet There was discussion of the format- and contents of a board information book, based on the outlines provided by Planner Repya and Chair Carr. There was a consensus of opinion that the two outlines needed to be merged into a reference binder for the use of individual HPB members, with some additional information available upon request. Chair Carr agreed to work with Planner Repya to prepare the content of the reference binder. No formal action was . taken. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes February 12, 2013 B. Neighborhood Association Naming Committee's Recommendation The board reviewed the recommendations made by the neighborhood association naming committee and several related emails from Edina residents. In particular, certain residents of the Country Club District had asked the HPB to review whether.or not the neighborhood naming would have an impact on the status of the Country Club District as an Edina Heritage Landmark, i.e. the use of the name "Greater Country Club Neighborhood" to include the Sunnyslope neighborhood as well as the historic district. Consultant Vogel advised the board that the naming of neighborhoods would have no effect orn heritage preservation, or in particular, on the status of or treatment of the Country Club District as an Edina Heritage Landmark. In view of the foregoing, no action was taken. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None Chair Carr - Member Carr reported that this was her last meeting as well as the last meeting for Members Curran, Anger and Stegner (who were absent). Ms. Carr thanked the board for giving her the opportunity to serve as chairperson and added that she will be following the upcoming activities of the HPB with great interest. X. STAFF COMMENTS None VI. NEXT. MEETING DATE March 12, 2013 X1 1. ADJOURNMENT 8:40 p.m. Member Davis moved for adjournment at 8:40 p.m. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Robert Vogel Preservation Planning Consultant And Claudia Carr Chair, Heritage Preservation Board 3 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FEBRUARY 27, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Staunton called the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission to order at 7:00 PM. II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Commissioners Forrest, Scherer, Schroeder, Kilberg, Potts, Platteter, Cherkassky, Carpeter, Grabiel, Staunton III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Meeting Agenda was approved as submitted. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEMS Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the February 13, 2012, meeting minutes. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No comment. VI. PUBLIC HEARING A. Variance. Oertel Architects /City of Edina. 7450 Metro Blvd., Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the City of Edina is requesting a 24 -foot setback variance to construct a 16.5 -foot tall, 40' x 30' protective canopy over the existing fuel island. The canopy would be constructed of prefinished metal panels to match the panels on the existing Public Works building. Page 1 of 18 Teague reported that the subject property is 7.8 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains the Public Works building, surface parking, loading do and a salt storage building. Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variance based on the following findings: a) The practical difficult is caused by the existing location of storm water utility lines that mandated the fuel islands to be located where they are; and the tight drive aisle area in which to move trucks through the site. b) The encroachment into the setback is a relatively minor area compared to the size of the existing building on the site. c) The request is reasonable given the location of the existing fuel islands. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following condition: 1. The canopy must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped February 5, 2013. Appearing for the Applicant Wayne Houle, City Engineer Discussion Commissioner Forrest asked Planner Teague if the proposed canopy is considered an accessory use. Teague responded in the affirmative. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing and asked if anyone would like to speak to this issue; being none, Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved variance approval for the canopy based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 8 -0. B. Variance. Hemberger. 5601 Countryside Road, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property is located on the south Page 2 of 18 side of Country side Road consisting of a 2 story home with an attached two car garage, The property owners would like to expand the back wall of the garage by 4.9 feet and add a second floor to include bedroom area and bathroom over the garage. The existing garage is located 8.1 feet from the west lot line and conforms to the minimum 5 foot side yard setback requirements for a garage. Currently there are storage trusses above the garage; however, it is not convertible to living space given the low roofline. The homeowners are proposing to increase the roof height in order to accommodate a bedroom area. The second floor area will be setback and indented from the front wall of the garage to reduce impact from the street view. The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 10 foot side yard setback for living space, however, six inches of setback must be added for each twelve inches the side wall height exceeds 15 feet. The height of the addition from grade to mid- point of the gable roof is 21.5 feet requiring a side yard setback of 12.5 feet. The existing garage provides a side yard setback of 8.1 feet therefore a 5.15 foot side yard setback variance is required. Aaker explained the neighboring house adjacent to the expansion area has their garage next to the improvement so the neighbor's living space is not directly affected. Spacing. between structures will remain the same at approximately 12 feet between the two garages. It should be noted that a similar room space above a garage at a nonconforming setback is just down the block at 5525 Countryside. Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance requested side yard setback variance, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it slightly alters existing conditions without reducing setback or impacting the surrounding neighbors. b. The imposed setback and existing house location does not provide opportunity for an increase in roof pitch or adequate room space above the existing garage. c. The original placement of the home closer to the west lot line makes it difficult to adjust living spaces within the existing structure. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions. Survey date stamped: 5/31/2012.and building plans/ elevations date stamped: February 12, 2013. Page 3 of 18 Appearing for the Applicant Mr. and Mrs. Hemberger Discussion Commissioner Forrest commented that in her opinion this request appears self- imposed. Planner Aaker responded that the applicant wanted to preserve the trees in the rear yard, adding their difficulty was that the house was constructed closer to one property line than the other, adding most houses in the immediate area weren't sited that way. The majority of houses in this area appear centered on the lot. Mrs. Hemberger said it was very important to them to preserve the trees in the rear yard and achieve additional space in a reasonable manner. Mr. Craig builder for the applicant explained that another issue they faced was the location of the load bearing wall. Mr. Craig noted a possible conforming location would require placing a support beam through the garage which would create difficulty in vehicle parking. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. No public comment. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All vote aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Forrest said that although she likes the project she was struggling with practical difficulties. Continuing, Forrest said if approved she would like added to the findings that the practical difficulties were the mature trees, location of the house on the lot and load bearing wall. Commissioner Platteter asked if any trees need to be removed to accommodate construction. Mr. Hemberger said all trees would remain. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved variance approval. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest asked if they would accept an amendment to the motion to include as practical difficulties the mature trees, load bearing wall and location of the house on the lot. Commissioners Grabiel and Carpenter accepted those findings. All voted aye; motion carried. Page 4 of 18 E. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Preliminary Redevelopment Plan, and Preliminary Plat. Anderson -KM Builders. 7171 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Lund Food Holdings is proposing to tear down the existing 59,000 Byerly's grocery store, located at 7171 France Avenue and build a two phase project. Phase 1 would include a new 47,000 square foot Byerly's store, a six /seven story 109 - unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking and a six /seven story, 77- unit apartment building with a first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking. Phase 2 would consist of a six -story 60 -unit apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. Teague reported In building the first phase, the new Byerly's store would be constructed in the parking lot of the existing store at the northwest corner of the site. The existing store would remain open. When the new store is finished the existing store would be removed, and then the two apartment buildings would be constructed. Concluding, Teague explained to accommodate the proposed redevelopment the following is requested; Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; Preliminary Development Plan; and Preliminary Plat. Teague noted if "preliminary" requests are approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Development Plan, Final Rezoning and Final Plat review which would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Continuing with his presentation Teague reminded the Commission that the applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council and from those meetings developed the proposed plans by attempting to address the issues raised by the Planning Commission and City Council. Those revisions include bringing the Byerly's store up to France Avenue, relocated the loading dock away from the Promenade, have the project embrace the Promenade, better pedestrian connections and providing some sustainable concepts. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to build a new 47,000 square foot.Byerly's store; a six -story 106 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a six - story, 77 -unit apartment building with first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking; and a six - story, 60 -unit apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on Page 9 of 18 the first level and two levels of underground parking. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. 5. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. 6. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. 7. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. 8. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. *Parking ratios Page 10 of 18 for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. d. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure And that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated January 28, 2012, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. Final Development plans should include specific locations of trash enclosure areas, number of bike parking spaces provided, and where loading /deliveries are made to the retail space and apartments. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated February 22, 2013. 6. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. Planner Teague further recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary.Plat to create a new four lot subdivision at 7171 France for the proposed project based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 3. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 4. The Park Dedication fee of $1,230,00 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Appearing for the Applicant Jim Vos, Cresa, Greg Anderson, Anderson Builders, Paul Holmes, Pope Architects, Maureen Page 11 of 18 Michaliski, Schaefer Richardson Questions /Discussion Commissioner Grabiel noted that presently there is a grade change from France Avenue onto the site and asked Planner Teague if the site would continue to be elevated from France. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest commented that she understands housing is a permitted Conditional Use in the PCD -3 zoning district and asked Planner Teague if the Commission could limit the type of retail "use" in the residential component of the project. Continuing, Forrest said if limiting uses are allowed how would the Commission do it - would it be per parcel. Planner Teague responded that presently all uses allowed in the PCD -3 zoning district are permitted; however, the Commission can limit those uses per site. Continuing, Teague noted that any "use" not "called out" in the ordinance is prohibited. Commissioner Forrest questioned if the developer could choose to develop this area through the PCD -3 zoning process and not through PUD. Teague responded that could occur; however, rezoning the site to PUD solidifies a "what is approved is what you get" development. A straight PCD -3 rezoning allows all uses permitted in that zoning district to be "used ". Applicant Presentation Jim Vos, Cresa, representing Lund Food Holdings, said they are happy to be back with a redevelopment proposal developed from the feedback they received from the Commission and Council at Sketch Plan Review. Vos introduced the development team. Paul Holmes addressed the Commission and explained the proposed redevelopment plan will be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 includes a replacement for the Byerly's store of 47,000 square feet, and two market -rate rental apartment buildings Building A is.a 6- story, 12.4,250 - square foot, 106 unit building, with two levels of underground parking. Building B consists of a 6- story, 81,375- square foot, 77 -unit building with 10.450 square feet of retail space on the west of the ground level, and two levels of underground parking. Phase 2 consists of a 50,400 square foot, 48 -unit apartment building, and 10,500 square feet of retail area on the west side of the ground level and two levels of underground parking. Concluding his presentation Holmes said RLK completed a traffic study, adding that the housing element would be managed by Steven Scott. Steven Manhart, RLK reported on the findings in the traffic analysis that indicated that this redevelopment would result in acceptable levels of service for traffic using existing roadways. Mr. Manhart said in particular it was found that the additional access points to and from the Byerly's redevelopment site greatly benefit the traffic operations despite there being more trips generated than in the current situation. Page 12 of 18 Chair Staunton asked City Engineer Houle to present his findings on the France Avenue TE, specifically because it relates so closely with what's occurring in the area as far as redevelopment goes. Houle delivered a power point presentation highlighting the following design elements: • Consider narrowing lanes • Widen and landscape medians • Enhance pedestrian crosswalks • Enhanced intersection corner treatments (suggested Biscuit Planters) • Traffic signal improvements • Pedestrian /bike phasing and detection • Accessible pedestrian signals (APS) countdown timers, etc. With graphics Houle illustrated traffic and pedestrian movements. Houle reported the schedule that would be followed. 1) Plans to Hennepin County /Federal Aid (2/4/2013); Plan approved for Letting (March 31, 2013), Construction June, 2013 — September 2013. Houle also reported a volunteer is needed at the Planning Commission level for Urban Design review. Houle stated this working group would focus on urban design for the corridor. Houle said he believes the working group would meet for roughly three months. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel asked if the proposed residential units are rental. Mr. Voss responded in the affirmative. Grabiel questioned their intent to replat — who would own the apartment buildings and could they be sold to another party. Vos responded the intent is a long term partnership with Schaefer Richardson, adding the parcels are being split to accommodate financial requirements for construction. Commissioner Forrest asked for clarification on the elevation of the residential community area, adding to her it appears above grade. Mr. Vos responded that area is above grade by roughly 7 -feet at its highest point. Chair Staunton asked if more units had been added since Sketch Plan Review. Mr. Vos responded in the affirmative. Mr. Holmes interjected and explained the siting of the buildings guided unit quantity, adding he believes there is an increase of 40- units. Staunton questioned if any consideration was given to pulling Building B closer to France Avenue. Mr. Holmes said their goal with the residential element of the project was to have the housing address the promenade as suggested by the Commission and Council. Continuing, Holmes said that their intent was also to separate the commercial from residential and to have the parking for the store be in front. Commissioner Scherer questioned if unit size was determined. Ms. Michalski informed the Commission there is a wide range of unit size. Studio apartments begin at around 590- square Page 13 of 18 feet, 1- bedrooms between 620 -830, and the range goes up from there with some loft units in excess of 1,500 square feet. Ms. Michalski gave a brief presentation of the housing units adding the design team went with a more classic look and feel to the residential building component of the project. Commissioner Scherer referred to a letter received from the property owner at 3655 Hazelton Road and asked if the lot line issue was clarified. Mr. Vos said they are working with that owner and are trying to strike a balance. Commissioner Potts said he is having a difficult time appreciating the pedestrian connection from the promenade. Potts added he imagined a more "formal" pathway from the promenade into the site and to the new store. Mr. Vos said options are still open, and pointed out the plans indicate a pedestrian grid throughout the site. Potts suggested they "take this to the next level" by emphasizing the paths and reduce parking spaces. Concluding Potts said there are some great features in this project; however, more needs to be done. Mr. Holmes responded that at this time the plans are in the preliminary stages. Commissioner Schroeder commented on sustainability referenced in the submitted materials and asked the development team if they have a .target or set of goals they want to achieve. Mr, Vos responded that the proposed new store would be smaller, which reduces energy and other measures such as mechanical design and lighting etc. would also be implemented. Ms. Michalski told the Commission the development team is also working with Excel, White Group on energy design. Mr. Vos reiterated with the use of better mechanical systems, lighting and the shrinking of the foot print there would be measurable energy savings. Commissioner Schroeder stated that may be true; however, he would like to see the applicant formulate an outline and frame a target that illustrates the energy efficiency measures that will be implemented for this project. Schroeder said he there are ways to document differences in energy consumption from a building constructed in 2013 to one that was constructed in the . 1970's or 80's. Ms. Michalski said working with the White Group should help the process. Commissioner Forrest asked in reference to Engineer Houle's presentation if Metro Transit is part of the discussion. Houle responded in the affirmative. Public Testimony The following spoke to the project: John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place Janet Bohan, 800 Coventry Place Bill Wolfson, 3655 Hazelton Road Resident of 7220 York Avenue Resident 7220 York Avenue Page 14 of 18 Motion Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to this project; being none; Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Chair Staunton asked if the store would have carry outs or would it be parcel pick up. Mr. Holmes responded parcel pick up is proposed for the store. Staunton further questioned if the type of retails uses have been determined. Mr. Holmes responded that he envisions a mobile phone store, a Noodles or Punch restaurant, adding the retail tenant mix is still being worked out. Commissioner Schroeder referred to the traffic figures and questioned if Byerly's was expecting to lose customers. He pointed out the traffic analysis standard considers building size; however, in this instance Schroeder said he doesn't believe the smaller Byerly's building makes any difference with regard to traffic to and from the store. A discussion ensued on traffic calculations, pedestrian access and site circulation. Chair Staunton noted that this is a two -step process; however it is very important the Commission gets preliminary right. Continuing, Staunton said from the discussion so far there appears to be building site issues on the east side, lack of sustainability measures and limited future build out analysis. Commissioner Kilberg said he would like to add a youth view to the discussion. Kilberg said he enjoys walking the Centennial Lakes pathways, adding that the access to the promenade is a huge plus for this redevelopment proposal. Kilberg said in his opinjon, this proposal should be developed as a destination; especially the Byerly's store and the small retail spaces. Kilberg also added the proposal is good for the community and achieving easy access for vehicles and pedestrians is beneficial for all. Concluding, Kilberg said he views this redevelopment as a continuation of Centennial Lakes park and promenade walking path. The walkability is very good and will flow as one large circle. Kilberg said he also envisions opportunity on the site to develop a "square" or meeting area, adding the current plan doesn't seem to achieve that level of pedestrian interaction. Commissioner Platteter stated he has continues to have concerns with the project and in general has trouble envisioning this parcel as pedestrian friendly; especially its relationship to the promenade. Platteter also noted that the interior pedestrian flow needs clarity - how will the pedestrian navigate between landscape islands and the retail components. Concluding Platteter stressed the importance 'of walkability. He said to achieve walkability the residential components may need to be pulled back from the promenade. With regard to sustainability and working with the White Group a certain percentage of measurability needs to be documented. He also said he was a bit uncomfortable with the water feature. Page 15 of 18 Commissioner Scherer also noted positive features of the plan; however expressed the following concerns: better refine connectivity, reconsider the variance from the promenade, will these apartment buildings be "light stealers" from the properties to the east; adding she is also uncomfortable with the loading dock. Commissioner Potts suggested that the applicant return to the Commission with a revised plan to include more information on sustainability, energy design and further explain the joint program with Excel. Commissioner Forrest said that the Commission and development team should work together in developing this site as a PUD. Forrest stated she was a little disappointed with the PUD process, noting, what's occurring isn't much different from a straight PCD -3 rezoning. Forrest reiterated she thought that through the PUD process the Commission and applicant would work together and come up with ideas that fine tune the project. Forrest pointed out this is the first time the Commission has viewed this proposal; it's an important proposal and in her opinion it requires more thought. Chair Staunton commented that instead of a continuance the Commission "could" grant preliminary rezoning approval and list the categories Commissioners feel need more work. Staunton relayed what he heard so far is: • Provide more clarity on pedestrian circulation within the site and how the pedestrian addresses the site from the promenade and vice versa. • Consider reconfiguring the apartment building layout; possible look at reducing the variance. • Hammer down the water feature on the site. • Some Commissioners expressed displeasure with the loading dock scenario; location and screening. Can this be reconfigured? • How does the pedestrian element tie in with the retail components of the apartment buildings? • Create a better blend or "tie in" between the residential component of the site and the promenade and the Byerly's store itself. • Consider "use" restrictions. • Develop sustainability measures. Mr. Vos questioned if the Commission was at least supportive of the site plan (building arrangements). Commissioners commented that they have little opposition to the west side of the site; however the east side of the site needs work. Mr. Vos asked if that could mean relocating or moving the buildings. Commissioners said that was a. possibility. Chair Staunton commented that in all fairness this has been a long meeting, agreeing that it may be best to continue the hearing to the next meeting of the Planning Commission on March Page 16 of 18 13th. This would allow the Commission more time to revisit the plans and also to allow more time for the applicant to possibly re -tool the project. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to continue the request for preliminary rezoning, preliminary plat, and preliminary development for Lund Holdings until the next meeting of the Planning Commission on March 13, 2013. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion to continue the meeting to March 13, 2013 approved. The applicants stressed how difficult it is to modify a site plan when certain factors can't be changed; one being the existing store must remain open during the construction of the new store and in terms of a loading dock; this is a grocery store, a loading dock is needed, and the Commission and Council have both indicated their desire to have the store relocated as close to France Avenue as possible. Mr. Holmes asked if the Commission had any suggestions on where the loading dock should be located; adding, there aren't many options. Concluding, the applicants asked for clarification and direction with the density and the orientation of the residential components of the project. Chair Staunton asked Commissioners to clarify if they "were OK" with the layout of the store and residential buildings. A number of Commissioners reiterated they were OK with the siting of the building on the west side (Byerly's store); however, were uncomfortable with the residential element on the east side. A number of Commissioners indicated they can't rule out the possibility of rearranging the buildings in the residential component. Commissioner Grabiel questioned what would happen if the applicant comes back and informs the Commission they can't change certain aspects of the project. It was noted if that were to occur the Commission would have to vote.the project either up or down. Chair Staunton thanked everyone for their participation adding the request has been tabled to the next meeting of the Planning Commission on March 13, 2013. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. Vlll. CHAIR AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Staunton thanked everyone for attending the ULI Workshop held at the Senior Center last week. Staunton also noted that in speaking with Planner Teague they felt it may be time to have a Planning "refresher" course with the City Attorney, Roger Knutson. Staunton said he and Teague would work on finding the right date for that event. Continuing, Staunton said it may be time to revisit the "Work Plan ", adding he would speak with Teague to set a date to add it to the agenda. Concluding, Staunton introduced new Page 17 of 18 appointee Claudia Carr, adding he would be working on a new seating arrangement for Commissioners. Commissioner Platteter reported that he wouldn't be attending the next Planning Commission meeting (March 13th) IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague asked if one member'of the Planning Commission would like to volunteer to serve on an Urban Design board as mentioned by Mr. Houle. Claudia Carr volunteered to serve. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Grabiel moved to adjourn the meeting at 11:50 pm. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 9494l Respectfully submitted Page 18 of 18 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION January 22, 2013 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston called the meeting to order at 7:07 PM. H. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Bigbee, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston, and Student Members Mohtadi and Stang. Staff present: Lisa Schaefer, Staff Liaison and Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Stanton to approve the meeting agenda of the January 22, 2013 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bigbee. Ayes: Bigbee, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED W. A. November 27, 2012 Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Seidman and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee to approve the November 27, 2012 minutes. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no community comments. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. 2013 Meeting Schedule Commissioner Finsness made a motion and Vice Chair Seidman seconded the motion to cancel the December 26th meeting. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Chair Kingston pointed out that the Commission had previous made a decision to change the March meeting to March 19, 2013. Motion was made by Commissioner Newell and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee to adopt the 2013 meeting schedule. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. B. Assess 2012 Commission Work Chair Kingston congratulated the Commission on a hard year's work; the Commission will evaluate the 2012 work plan and decide what to carry over to the 2013 work plan. Domestic Partner Ordinance Commissioner Stanton explained this is no longer just a local government issue; there may be bills at the state level for domestic partner benefits. Chair Kingston clarified what is currently on the 2012 work plan was for contracting preference to be given to companies that offer domestic partner benefits when all else is equal. Commissioner Winnick suggested the domestic partner ordinance may need to be adjusted from time to time. As more issues come up in this area, and at the state level having a person be the contact could be helpful. Commissioner Bigbee suggested a revision to action and due date in light of new developments at the State. It should be revised to say, will monitor the domestic partner ordinance and what is developing and will bring up changes as necessary. Chair Kingston pointed out the State is not bringing up contracts, and this was put on here to be a focus of the joint work session. Commissioner Finsness suggested monitoring at all levels. Commissioner Winnick suggested changing the category to monitor domestic partner ordinance and propose changes to City policy in accordance with domestic partner related developments. Commissioner Stanton expressed his interest in taking over if there is a broader mission to the category. Commissioner Bigbee made a motion and Commissioner Winnick seconded a motion to create a broader mission for the monitoring domestic partnership ordinance commission initiative and to accept Commissioner Stanton's offer to lead the broadened objective. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Commissioner Stanton will lead item four and present the contracting information in May at the Joint session with the Council. In April, Commission Stanton will bring forward other .issues for us to consider for the Joint Session. At the next meeting Commissioner Stanton will bring forth an idea of what a broader objective in this area would look like. Initiate Census Research Funding Recommendation Commissioner Stanton made a motion to remove initiating census research funding in 2013 and replace with community outreach efforts. Vice Chair Seidman seconded the motion. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Commissioner Bigbee asked if Commissioner Stanton and Newell would still be in leading this issue. Commissioner Newell commented Fartun Weli is planning to report back to us in the upcoming months with what she will need in order to help with outreach. She offered to lead the initiative. Commissioner Stanton shared an update about the Resolution 2012 -178 approved by Council about domestic partner health care benefits. He also offered to talk to legislatures about the resolution at the capital, if the City would like to. Staff Liaison Schaefer will check with Manager Neal about whether Commissioner Stanton should speak to legislators on behalf of the City about the resolution. Chair Kingston asked if Commissioner Stanton would like to include this with the first item monitoring domestic partner related issues. The Commission agreed the item would fit with the broader mission. C. 2013 Work Plan and Budget Edina Reads Chair Kingston shared, although all of the items on the 2013 work plan were approved by the Council, the budget for the HRRC was not changed. The Commission has $3,050 for all activities and needs to prioritize the funds. In 2012, the Commission purchased the books for Edina Reads. Commissioner Finsness explained the only item left is the Speaker fee for $150.00. Any other money would be for video and communications. We would need to discuss that with Jennifer. Chair Kingston suggested capping this at $500 for video. Staff Liaison Schaefer stated she would check on the budget. She also clarified the City is in the second year of a two year budget, there could be an additional request made at another date. Chair Kingston stated we will put down $150 and pend additional funding for video production. Developing Cross Organizational Partnerships Commissioner Stanton stated the $1,500 for developing cross organizational partnerships was just a place holder at this point and could probably be cut in half. Commissioner Newell disagreed and said until we hear from Fartun she is hesitant to cut the budget. She wanted to put together a work plan with Fartun, doing it as a request for our group where she would record her hours, etc. Commissioner Seidman asked if she would be essentially a consultant. Commissioner Newell said yes, but she has not replied with what she would need in order to do that yet. Commissioner Finsness suggested we could make a recommendation to the Council to use her expertise and it could come from another source of City funds. Chair Kingston stated she did not leave the November meeting thinking the Commission had agreed to hire her as a consultant to the Commission. Commissioner Newell responded at the end of the meeting we asked where we wanted to take this and Fartun said she would put a proposal together we could consider. Chair Kingston clarified she thought it was what the Commission could do, not that we were hiring her. Commissioner Bigbee stated if we go to the Council for this, there are partners like the police department and parks and recreation. Commissioner Finsness proposes leaving the $1,500 as is today, because we don't have enough information. Explore support opportunities for victims of domestic violence Commissioner Newell said she envisioned having someone come in and talk about the needs for victims of domestic violence. There would be no budget associated with the item. Commissioner Bigbee stated getting more information and data from the police about incidents could be helpful. Commissioner Seidman suggested a bigger event rather than just the Commission; the Commission could advertise the event to the public. Days of Remembrance Chair Kingston shared there are still some unknowns in the budget. She does not know what the space fee for the school would be, and if they would charge a fee for renting the piano. This event is probably going to be over $1,000 which would put us over budget at this point. The would also need a piano. Commissioner Finsness asked if there is a date and if a church with a piano and seats, could work. Chair Kingston said we could look at that but we were trying to keep the venue neutral. Commissioner Bigbee suggested reaching out to multiple faith groups to get funding for the space. Chair Kingston stated we are going to have to make a decision pretty quickly about this and where we will spend our dollars, and she was not comfortable fundraising. Commissioner Finsness stated she believes they paid about $450 for tech fees and did not pay for the space last time. D. Appoint leaders for each Commission initiative Chair Kingston confirmed that all of the initiatives have an assigned leader and leaders would give updates at the next meeting. E. Discover Human Rights training series by The Advocates for Human Rights Commissioner Bigbee explained two offers for training for human rights. The first one is from the Advocates for Human Rights. This is a series of four workshops. Each session is half a day. From previous experience, they have been really good. He thought this could be an educational opportunity for commission members and employees. Chair Kingston shared the last two options are courses that relate to a step by step process for implementation. She will probably be sending some of her City of St. Paul staff, and she will give an update on their experiences. F. YWCA of Minneapolis Racial Justice Workshops Commissioner Bigbee shared he is not very familiar with the next option but it would be another opportunity for commission members and city staff. Staff Liaison Schaefer will share this with all appropriate city staff. Commissioner Bigbee shared his experience working with the LMHRC. He has been working with the group since 2010. He has suggested ways in which the league could be more effective. He recommends that if the City gets an invoice for membership that the City does not continue to be members at this time. He is open to someone else representing HRRC if they want to continue. Chair Kingston explained her experience with the group over the past two years. Some of the cities who were on the league have left the league or disbanded their human rights commissions. She agrees with Arnie and his experience and would support moving away from the league for 2013. Commissioner Bigbee moved and Commissioner Winnick seconded a motion to suspend the commission's membership with the LNUMC to be revisited next year. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. H. Present Tom Oye Award nominations Commissioner Winnick shared that the Commission received five nominations for the Tom Oye Award. Two nominations were for the same candidate, and one nomination was for two co- nominees resulting in five nominees. Commissioner Winnick made the motion and Commissioner Seidman seconded the motion accepting the nominations. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Commissioner Winnick moved to formally establish a two year cycle for all nominations not selected as a recipient of the award, without any further work on the nominee's part. When the thank you letter goes out to all nominees and nominators announcing the award recipient, they should also be informed of the two year cycle. Commissioner Seidman seconded the motion. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Commissioner Winnick made a motion to move the nomination deadline date to before the January meeting, so discussions can take place at the February meeting, and the final action at the March meeting. Commissioner Bigbee seconded the motion. Commissioner Finsness stated she still feels she would have trouble making a determination without more detailed criteria. Chair Kingston stated the Commission had previously determined they will not be establishing further criteria during this award cycle. Ayes: Bigbee, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Abstain: Finsness Motion carried. Commissioner Winnick stated they should formalize the voting process. Commissioner Winnick made a motion that the vote be held like any other vote of the Commission, by individual vote of the Commissioners present, majority rule. Commissioner Stanton seconded the motion. Commissioner Finsness stated she would like her comments to be considered, because she feels you cannot vote up or down this many people without running into ties. She feels very uncomfortable voting on five individuals who are all very well qualified without the Commission having common definitions of what the criteria is. She didn't vote last year and will not vote again, because she feels all of the nominees meet the criteria. Chair Kingston stated the application does have criteria listed. The Commission has discussed having a rubric many times. In September, the Commission decided to table the rubric or modifying the criteria until after the 2013 Tom Oye Award cycle is finished in April. Commission Newell asked for Commissioner Winnick to state the current criteria that is on the form. Commissioner Winnick shared the following selection criteria. Selection Criteria Anyone who lives or works in Edina is eligible for this award. Nominees will be evaluated based on their efforts to: (1) Foster respect and dignity for others (2) Model courage and/or compassion in the advancement of human rights (3) Demonstrate leadership by example for improving human relations and/or advancing human rights Chair Kingston stated this has gone on for a number of months and we already decided the issue is tabled until May. She does not want the Commission to spend more time on something that has already been voted on and discussed many times. If a member chooses to not participate in this process, that is his/her choice. Commissioner Newell asked if stated everyone was comfortable with what the criteria mean. Commissioner Stanton explained he has participated in a lot of democratic bodies, and you cannot reduce everything to a totally objective decision. There is a place for subjective evaluation. Commissioner Newell pointed out there is a description which outlines criteria, there just seems to be some discomfort with what the criteria means. The description is the basis of what a rubric would be to go any further would mean we all have different definitions of these terms. Commissioner Seidman agreed with Commissioner Stanton. She stated it feels bad to pick one winner, but eventually we need to make a decision. The rubric was on previous agendas, but no specific rubric was ever brought forward for consideration, and they needed to move forward with the nomination process. Commissioner Bigbee shared they are all good candidates, it is a choice and it does reflect us as a group, culture and society. The real goals are to lift up someone in our community and acknowledge them. Commissioner Winnick stated he felt deference has been given by the chair to discuss this again because this has already been decided on by the Commission for this year. We have an approach and by majority vote it can go forward. What we have to remember is that our nomination has a tremendous effect on the winner. Commissioner Newell shared she felt the difference is how we are interpreting. For Commissioner Finsness, the award is a property right. Commissioner Newell asked why we needed to have one winner. Commissioner Seidman moved to call to question and Commissioner Stanton seconded the motion. Ayes: Bigbee, Kingston, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Nays: None. Motion carried. Return to original motion regarding voting. Ayes: Bigbee, Kingston, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Nays: None. Motion carried. I. Present Chair and Vice Chair nominees Commissioner Winnick shared they have one Commissioner willing to stand for Chair, Commissioner Bigbee and one Commissioner willing to stand for Vice Chair, Commissioner Seidman. Chair Kingston clarified there will be a discussion at next month's meeting and they will allow any nominations from the floor, then the Commission will vote. If we have a contested race, each person can speak for no more than three minutes. Commissioner Winnick reminded the group, if the race is contested, it will be by ballot signed by the voter. Chair Kingston reminded the group they will also have an opening for administrative chair. After the Chair and Vice Chair has been concluded they will need to choose a new administrative chair. J. 2013 Work Plan Edina Reads Commissioner Finsness asked to allow time to talk about the Edina Read's book. Commissioner Bigbee asked to put it on the agenda for next meeting for 20 minutes. Commissioner Finsness shared the League of Women voters is on board to help with publicize the event. Student Commissioner Stang shared that she talked to some parent groups about including the book in the spring newsletters; she will also be distributing posters around the school for the event. Commissioner Finsness said one Edina teacheris having her whole class read the book. Days of Remembrance Chair Kingston explained she is trying to pick a day with Janet Horvath and wanted to know whether or not a Saturday or Sunday performance would work. Commissioner Seidman shared two years ago, the event was held on a weekend and we had a good turnout. Commissioner Finsness asked if there is a difference in cost or availability with the school. Commissioner Winnick asked if it was enough for a program. Chair Kingston shared Janet speaks and there are pictures.She normally leads a discussion afterwards. She believes Janet has only performed the piece three times before. Chair Kingston asked if the Student Commissioners Stang and Mohtadi would want to help with the event. Both Commissioners agreed. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Kingston shared there was one correspondence that came to the Mayor, and may work well with the monitoring domestic partner ordinance work plan item. It is about gender expression being included in our definition of human rights. Commissioner Bigbee asked if the phrase `gender expression' is common terminology. Commissioner Winnick stated right now the policy reflects the State Statute. He is going to look into whether transgender has been interpreted and included under sexual orientation. Staff Liaison Schaefer shared our policy does reflect state statute and in employment law sexual orientation has been interpreted to include transgender. That doesn't mean the Commission couldn't recommend to the Council to change the terminology. Commissioner Stanton stated our policy has not always matched up with the law. Chair Kingston stated I am not sure if the transgender community would feel they belong under sexual orientation. In the past, Outfront Minnesota has talked to us about labeling single stall bathrooms as unisex, but this has not been on their list. Commissioner Newell and Winnick will both reach out to the writer. Commissioner Stanton will talk to Outfront Minnesota. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Bigbee shared several publications and said he has a lending library if anyone would like any reading material. Commissioner Seidman asked about recruitment for the boards and commissions. Applications are due on February 1 at 4:30 pm. Commissioner Stanton asked about how term limits work, and if there is a break between serving years if they can come back. Staff will check on that information and get back to the Commission. Commissioner Finsness shared she has received a human rights kit to help teach human rights. The Commission will allocate around 15 minutes on the March meeting. 1X. STAFF COMMENTS Staff Liaison Schaefer reminded the group about the electronic packet and asked the Commission to let us know if you would like a paper copy. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Commissioner Bigbee moved and Commissioner Seidman seconded adjournment of the meeting. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. Chair Kingston declared the meeting adjourned at 9:17 PM. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC, February 26, 2013 Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern Jessi Kingston, HRRC Chair • MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 19, 2013 10:15 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the meeting to order at 10:15 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5, 2013 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for February 5, 2013. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-03 AUTHORIZING OPEN TO BUSINESS PROGRAM ADOPTED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf explained the City has in 2012, the implemented an "Open to Business" program to provide free business consultation to Edina -based entrepreneurs and others interested in opening a small business in Edina. The Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers (MCCD) was contracted to provide the service based on their success in other cities. He stated during the first year, MCCD served 17 Edina clients and provided consultation on a variety of business ideas including: optometrist, cross cultural marketing consulting, plastic moving box rental, restaurant, financial planner, risk management consulting, import/export, food manufacturer, and staffing agency. Mr. Neuendorf stated the efforts resulted in the creation or retention of 23 jobs with MCCD also approving capital loans totaling $80,000 to bring the ideas to fruition. Mr. Neuendorf said Hennepin County has again offered to split the costs to municipalities that provide this service. The Hennepin County HRA will fund up to 50% of the $10,000 annual fee provided that Edina contributes a matching amount ($5,000). Based on the success of the program in the first year and the potential for even better results in 2013, staff recommended that the Edina HRA approve this program and authorize staff to seek funds from Hennepin County and renew a contract with MCCD to continue providing this service during 2013. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Swenson made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bennett adopting Resolution No. 2013 -03 authorizing the Open to Business Program, authorizing staff to seek Hennepin County Funds and renewing the MCDD contract provided service in 2013. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 1 Scott Neal, Executive Director w.ne o J� 0 To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: III. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: March 19, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 - 04, Finding that Parcel is Occupied by a Structurally Substandard Building Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information I Background: The former Public Works facility located at 5146 Eden Avenue is intended to be cleared in order to eliminate a potential nuisance and to make the site more attractive for complete redevelopment. The demolition contract (approved February 19, 2013) is anticipated to be financed by the HRA with funds remaining from the previous Grandview TIF redevelopment district. The Grandview Development Framework (approved April 2012) recommends that Tax Increment Financing (TIF) be considered to fund future improvements in the area. The first step in that process is declaring one or more buildings to be substandard. After a building is found to be substandard, the City has three years to establish a TIF District that includes the site of the substandard building. The existing structure has been inspected to document its condition. The inspector determined that the vacant building is in poor condition and lacks numerous elements required of new buildings. The report notes a complete lack of accessibility features as well as a lack of life safety, fire protection systems and inadequate mechanical ventilation systems. The report concludes that "after inspecting and evaluating the building within the proposed TIF District on March 12, 2013, and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment District... it is our professional opinion that the building qualifies as substandard." Based on these findings, staff recommends that the HRA approve the attached Resolution. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -04 LHB Report dated March 13, 2013 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-04 FINDING THAT PARCEL IS OCCUPIED BY A STRUCTURALLY SUBSTANDARD BUILDING BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. The HRA intends to include in a tax increment financing district to be created by HRA under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179 (the "TIF District "), 3 tax parcels located in the City of Edina (the "City ") at 5146 Eden Avenue consisting of PID #s 28- 117 -31 -0014, 28- 117 -21 -31 -0015, and 28- 117 -21 -31 -0016 (together, the "Parcel'), on which the former public works facility of the City is located. The HRA has engaged LHB, Inc. to inspect the Parcel and the building located on the Parcel and to prepare a report as to the Parcel and the condition of the building. A copy of the report of LHB, Inc. dated March 13, 2013 (the "LHB Report"), has been presented to and reviewed by the Board of Commissioners. It is expected that the building located on the Parcel will be demolished and removed by the City prior to the creation of the TIF District, and the cost of such demolition and removal will be financed by the HRA. 2. The Board of Commissioners hereby finds as follows: (a) that the building located on the Parcel is structurally substandard within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10(b), since it contains defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance; (b) that the building located on the Parcel is not in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings and could not be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15% of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the Parcel; (c) more than 15% of the area of each of the 3 tax parcels included in the Parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or similar structures; and (d) after the demolition and removal of the building on the Parcel the HRA intends to include the Parcel within the TIF District. In making the findings under (a), (b) and (c) above the HRA is relying on the LHB Report. Attest: Dated: March 19, 2013 Ann Swenson, Secretary James B. Hovland, Chair 250 Third Avenue North, Suite 450 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612.338.2029 Fax 612.338.2088 www.LHBcorp.com March 13, 2013 Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 TIF ANALYSIS FOR 5146 EDEN AVENUE (PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY) LHB was hired to inspect the former public works facility at 5146 Eden Avenue in Edina, MN in order to determine if it meets the definition of "Substandard" as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10. The building could potentially be included in a future Redevelopment TIF District, so will need to be compliant with all of the statutes pertaining to a Redevelopment District. Duluth, MN Minneapolis, MN STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR . I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of March 19, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Executive Director Edina Public Works Facility TIF Analysis Page 3 of 5 March 13, 2013 tr ,1 M rf tTt � r � � 1 x' tart w-r.l� � � 1 1 *V- Site Diagram 1 B. Condition of Building,_ - ___ ... "and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance;" 1. Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, `structurally substandard' shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." a. We do not count energy code deficiencies toward the thresholds required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b)) defined as "structurally substandard ", due to concerns expressed by the State of Minnesota Court of Appeals in the Walser Auto Sales, Inc. vs. City of Richfield case filed November 13, 2001. II r �r wmt- 1 � rr r tr ,1 M rf tTt � r � � 1 x' tart w-r.l� � � 1 1 *V- Site Diagram 1 B. Condition of Building,_ - ___ ... "and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance;" 1. Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, `structurally substandard' shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." a. We do not count energy code deficiencies toward the thresholds required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b)) defined as "structurally substandard ", due to concerns expressed by the State of Minnesota Court of Appeals in the Walser Auto Sales, Inc. vs. City of Richfield case filed November 13, 2001. Edina Public Works Facility TIF Analysis Page 2 of 5 March 13, 2013 CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the building within the proposed TIF District on March 12, 2013, and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, it is our professional opinion that the building qualifies as substandard. The remainder of this letter and attachments describe our process and findings in detail. MINNESOTA STATUTE 469.174, SUBDIVISION 10 REQUIREMENTS The property was inspected in accordance with the following requirements under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), which states: Interior Inspection "The municipality may not make such determination [that the building is structurally substandard] without an interior inspection of the property..." Exterior Inspection and Other Means "An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard." Documentation "Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3(1)." Qualification Requirements Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 (a) (1) requires two tests for occupied parcels: A. Coverage Test ... "parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots" The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains building, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots." Findings: The public works site is made up of three parcels, with more than 15 percent of each parcel occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots (see attached site diagram no. 1, and summary spreadsheet). Edina Public Works Facility TIF Analysis Page '4 of 5 March 13, 2013 Findings: This building exceeds the criteria required to be determined a substandard building. 2. Buildings are not eligible to be considered structurally substandard unless they meet certain additional criteria, as set forth in Subdivision 10(c) which states: "A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence." "Items of evidence that support such a conclusion [that the building is not disqualified] include recent fire or police inspections, on -site property appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence." LHB counts energy code deficiencies toward the 15 percent code threshold required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c)) for the following reasons: • The Minnesota energy code is one of ten building code areas highlighted by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry website where minimum construction standards are required by law. • The index page of the 2007 Minnesota Building Code lists the Minnesota Energy Code as a "Required Enforcement" area, compared to an additional list of "Optional Enforcement" chapters. • The Senior Building Code Representative for the Construction Codes and Licensing Division of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry confirmed that the Minnesota Energy Code is being enforced throughout the State of Minnesota. In a January 2002 report to the Minnesota Legislature, the Management Analysis Division of the Minnesota Department of Administration confirmed that the construction cost of new buildings complying with the Minnesota Energy Code is higher than buildings built prior to the enactment of the code. Proper TIF analysis requires a comparison between the replacement value of a new building built under current code standards with the repairs that would be necessary to bring the existing building up to current code standards. In order for an equal comparison to be made, all applicable code chapters should be applied to both scenarios. Since current construction estimating software automatically applies the construction cost of complying with the Minnesota Energy Code, energy code deficiencies should also be identified in the existing structures. Findings: This building exceeds the building code deficiency criteria required to be determined substandard, with over 15 percent of its replacement value required to modify building code deficiencies. Edina Public Works Facility TIF Analysis Page 5 of 5 March 13, 2013 TEAM CREDENTIALS Michael A. Fischer, AIA LEED AP - Project PrincipaUTIFAnalyst Michael has twenty -six years of architectural experience as project .principal, project manager, project designer and project architect on municipal planning, educational, commercial and governmental projects. He is a Senior Vice President at LHB and currently leads the Minneapolis office. Michael completed a two -year Bush Fellowship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1999, earning Masters Degrees in City Planning and Real Estate Development. Michael has served on over 40 committees, boards, commissions and community task forces, including a term as.City Council President in Superior, Wisconsin, Chair of the Duluth/Superior Metropolitan Planning organization, and Chair of the Planning Commission in Edina, Minnesota. Michael was one of four architects in the country to receive the National "Young Architects Citation" from the American Institute of Architects in 1997. CLOSING We have attached a summary spreadsheet, building code /condition deficiency report, replacement cost worksheet, code - related repair cost worksheets, and thumbnail photo sheets of the existing building condition for inclusion in your council resolution. Please contact me at (612) 752 -6920 if you have any questions. LHB INC. MICHAEL A. FISCHER, AIA, LEED AP SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT M: \13Proj \130153 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF \Public Works Building \Public Works Facility Letter of Finding 3- 13- 13.doc. ® 311&13 Grandview Redevelopment TIF Analysis SUMMARY SPREADSHEET 11F Improved or . Survey Method Site Area Coverage Area of Coverage Percent Coverage No. of Building 15%of Building Code No. of Buildings No. of buildings Map No. 4 Properly Address and Name • Vacant Vacant Used I&F.) Improvements of Improvements Guandty Buildings Replaeamem Replacement Deficiencies Exceeding 15% determined (S.F.) (S.F.) Cost Cost Criteria substandard - 1 28.117 -21. 31-0016 5146 Eden Avenue - Public Works Fec11@y, Improved InterlorlExterior 126,996 115.000 90.6% 126,996 1 $3,439.601 $515,940 $1.098,118 1 1 2 28. 117.21 - 31.0015 5146 Eden Avenue - Public Works Site Improved WA 9,000 8.000 88.9% 9.000 0 3 28. 117 -21- 31-0014 5147 Eden Avenue - Public Works Site Improved WA 9,000 3,000 .33.3% 9.000 0 TOTALS 144.996 144.9% 1 1 1 Total Coverage Percent: 100.0% Percent of buildings exceeding 15 percent code deficiency threshold: 100.0% Percent of buildings determined substandard: 100.0 °� r CM1ke Fhth.,V3— ridv1wr'nF Iftktf P bN, Wdrka Bu dtnglEdme Grandvhw R°devebpmeni TIF Summery Spreed3heet J -13.13 5146 EDEN AVENUE CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT March 13, 2013 Map No. & Building Name: Map No. 1 Former Public Works Facility Address & PID: 5146 Eden Avenue, PID 28- 117 -21 -31 -0016 Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): March 12, 2013, 3:30pm Inspection Type: Interior /Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $ 3,439,600 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $ 1,098,118 Percentage of Replacement Cost: 31.9% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. The roof does not meet current minimum slope requirements per code. 2. Interior floor slab and walls are damaged due to fire department training. B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Restroom facilities do not meet current accessibility codes. b. `Copper has been removed from the building, plumbing system is not functioning. c. Drinking fountain near entrance lobby does not meet code. d. Grease traps in the repair garage do not meet current codes. 2. Light and Ventilation a. The ventilation system is not adequate in the shop area. b. The cooling and heating system is not adequate in the office area. c. Light fixtures are old, not energy efficient and mostly not working. 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. The mezzanine stairs do not meet current codes. b. Railings on all stairs do not meet current codes. c. An elevator is required for access to the upper floor. d. Guard rails at mezzanine spaces do not meet current codes. 4. ' Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. All wall surfaces require new paint. b. All interior (wall, ceiling, floor) surfaces require updating. c. Windows are broken in several offices. Exterior Construction a. Several exterior windows are broken, allowing air and water to infiltrate the building. b. The public entrance to the building does not have an airlock vestibule. c. All man doors are weathered and lightly damaged. d. Overhead doors have minor staining, dents and dings. e. The exterior wall has rust spots in various locations. f. Concrete block on both sides of public entrance are damaged. g. Areas of damage and decay are visible on roof eaves. Overview of Condition Deficiencies The former public works building is a large structure used for storage and maintenance of vehicles and equipment along with office functions for public works, streets, utilities, park and recreation and other miscellaneous groups. It was built in 1963 and vacated in 2010 after the City constructed a new public works facility. Overall, the building is in poor condition as a result of age and non -use. A significant amount of work would be required for this building to be made functional for a public or non - public use. In total, the defects and deficiencies in this building are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. Description of Code Deficiencies 1. The roof does not meet current minimum slope requirements per code. 2. Restroom facilities do not meet current accessibility codes. 3. Drinking fountain near entrance lobby does not meet code. 4. Grease traps in the repair garage do not meet current codes. 5. The ventilation system is not adequate in the shop area. 6. The cooling and heating system is not adequate in the office area. 7. The mezzanine stairs do not meet current codes. 8. Railings on all stairs do not meet current codes. 9. An elevator is required for access to the upper floor. 10. Guard rails at mezzanine spaces do not meet current codes. 11. Windows are broken allowing air and water to infiltrate the building envelope. Energy Code In addition to the building code deficiencies listed above, the existing building does not comply with the current energy code. These deficiencies are not included in the estimated costs to correct code deficiencies and are not considered in determining whether or not the building is substandard: - Building's light fixtures are not energy efficient per code — T -12 fixtures. - Building's walls and roof seem to lack adequate insulation to meet code. - Building's windows are not energy efficient per code. M: \13Proj \130153 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF \Public Works Building\Public Works Substandard Building Report 3- 13- 13.doc Square Foot Cost Estimate Report Estimate Name: Edina Public Works 1.05 42,932 Garage, Repair with Poured Concrete / Steel Strip footing, concrete, reinforced, load 11.1 KLF, soil bearing capacity 6 Building Type: Joists A1030 Location: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 356,952 Slab on grade, 6" thick, light industrial, reinforced Story Count: 1 , IP = , ,n•f rrrrrtrnG Story Height (L.F.): 20 ,ten,,, Floor Area (S.F.): Labor Type: 40888i STD fn Basement Included: No 0 Data Release: t1 Year 2013 Quarter 1 Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. Cost Per Square Foot: $81.82 Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. Building Cost: $3,439,600.78 248,599 %of Total i[Cost Per S.F. -'I' Cost A1010 Standard Foundations 1.05 42,932 Strip footing, concrete, reinforced, load 11.1 KLF, soil bearing capacity 6 A1030 Slab on Grade 8.73 356,952 Slab on grade, 6" thick, light industrial, reinforced A2010 Basement Excavation 0 0 Excavate and fill, 30,000 SF, 4' deep, sand, gravel, or common earth, on A2020 Basement Walls 0 0 Foundation wall, CIP, 4' wall height, direct chute, .148 CY /LF, 7.2 PLF, B1020 Roof Construction 6.08 248,599 Roof, steel joists, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on bearing walls, 40' bay, 25.5" 82010 Exterior Walls 8.65 353,681 Concrete wall, reinforced, 8' high, 8" thick, plain finish, 3000 PSI B2020 Exterior Windows 0.79 32,302 Windows, aluminum, sliding, standard glass, 5'x 3' B2030 Exterior Doors 1.65 67,465 Door, steel 18 gauge, hollow metal, 1 door with frame, no label, 3' -0" x Door, steel 24 gauge, overhead, sectional, manual operation, 12' -0" x 12'• B3010 Roof Coverings 6.62, 270,679 Roofing, asphalt flood coat, gravel, base sheet, 3 plies 15# asphalt felt, Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite with 2" EPS, 1" perlite Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face Gravel stop, aluminum, extruded, 4 ", mill finish, .050" thick B3020 Roof Openings 0 0 Skylight, plastic domes, insulated curbs, 10 SF to 20 SF, single glazing C1010 Partitions 1.87 76,461 Lightweight block 4" thick C1020 Interior Doors 0.43 17,582 Door, single leaf, kd steel frame, hollow metal, commercial quality, flush, C1030 Fittings 0.04 1,636 Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung,•stainless steel C3010 Wall Finishes 2.95 120,620 2 coats paint on masonry with block filler Painting, masonry or concrete, latex, brushwork, primer & 2 coats E1090 Other Equipment F Special Construction Painting, masonry or concrete, latex, brushwork, addition for block filler � C3020 Floor Finishes 1.44 58,879 Concrete topping, hardeners, metallic additive, minimum Vinyl, composition tile, minimum C3030 Ceiling Finishes 0.43 17,582 Acoustic ceilings, 5/8" fiberglass board, 24" x 48" tile, tee grid, �F D2010 Plumbing Fixtures 3.49 142,699 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with.flush valve, wall hung Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung Lavatory w /trim, wall hung, PE on Cl, 19" x 17" Service sink w /trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w /rim guard, 24" x 20" Shower, stall, baked enamel, molded stone receptor, 30" square Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH D2020 Domestic Water Distribution 0.59 24,124 Gas fired water heater, residential, 100< F rise, 30 gal tank, 32 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage 2.08 85,047 Roof drain, steel gals sch 40 threaded, 4" diam piping, 10' high Roof drain, steel galv sch 40 threaded, 4" diam piping, for each D3050 Terminal & Package Units 10.03 410,107 Rooftop, single zone, air conditioner, factories, 10,000 SF, 33.33 ton D3090 Other HVAC Systems /Equip 0.23 9,404 Garage, single exhaust, 3" outlet, cars & light trucks, 1 bay Garage, single exhaust, 3" outlet, additional bays up to seven bays D4010 Sprinklers 5.05 206,484 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, ordinary hazard, 1 floor, 10,000 SF D4020 Standpipes 0 0 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor Wet standpipe risers, class Ill, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, D5010 Electrical Service /Distribution 0.13 5,315 Service installation, includes breakers, metering, 20' conduit & wire, 3 Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 200 A Switchgear installation, incl switchboard, panels & circuit breaker, D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring 8.72 356,543 Receptacles incl plate, box, conduit, wire, 4 per 1000 SF, .5 watts per SF Miscellaneous power, 1 watt Central air conditioning power, 3 watts Fluorescent fixtures recess mounted in ceiling, 1.6 watt per SF, 40 FC, 10 - D5030 Communications and Security 2.0 81,776 Communication and alarm systems, fire detection, addressable, 25 Fire alarm command center, addressable with voice, excl. wire & conduit - Internet wiring, 4 data /voice outlets per 1000 S.F. D5090 Other Electrical Systems 0.1 4,089 Generator sets, w /battery, charger, muffler and transfer switch, E1030 Vehicular Equipment 0 0 Architectural equipment, auto equipment hoists, single post, 4 ton E1090 Other Equipment F Special Construction 0° /d � 0 G Building Sitework 0 SubTotal 100% $71.15 2,990,957 Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit) 10.00% $7.12 299,096 Architectural Fees 5.00% $3.56 149,548 User Fees 0.00% $0.00 0 'Total Building Cost .� Edina, Minnesota Proposed Grandview TIF District Project No. 130153.00 Parcel 28- 117 -21 -31 -0016 - Public Works Facility Unit Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Quantity Total Accessibility Items Replace toilets to provide handicap accessibility for each sex Build (4) new acccessible toilet rooms W/ compliant number of accessories and fixtures Remove existng toilet rooms $ 2,250.00 Lump 3 $ 6,750.00 3 water closets $ 3,750.00 each 4 $ 15,000.00 3lays $ 2,500.00 each 4 $ 10,000.00 2 Urinals $ 2,500.00 each 2 $ 5,000.00 3 sets of grab bars $ 600.00 each 4 $ 2,400.00 3 sets toilet room accessories $ 750.00 each 4 $ 3,000.00 Interior room reconstruction (doors, partitions,finishes) $ 60.00 SF 500 $ 30,000.00 Reinstall toilet Room Ventilation System $ 1,000.00 each 4 $ 4,000.00 Interior configuration does not provide for accessible route. Interior handicap access route not provided through out building. MN 1341.0405, Item E Add Elevator to upper level spaces Elevator Pit and footings $ 8,000.00 Lump 1 $ 8,000.00 12" CMU Elevator Shaft walls $ 13.00 SF 1,216 $ 15,808.00 Elevator Equipment (2 stop) $ 44,575.00 Lump 1 $ 44,575.00 Elevator Equipment Room (Assume 64 SF) $ 30.00 SF 64 $ 1,920.00 Power 100 amp 3 phase Safety Switch $ 520.00 Lump 1 $ 520.00 Circuit Breaker $ 795.00 Lump 1 $ 795.00 Motor Starter $ 450.00 Lump 1 $ 450.00 Wire and Conduit Feeder (150 feet assumed) $ 31.00 LF 150 $ 4,650.00 Fire Alarm Connections $ 1,000.00 lump 1 $ 1,000.00 Emergency Phone Connection $ 12.00 LF 150 $ 1,800.00 Fire Seperation Items Office area must be fire separated from Garage area Provide new fire rated doors at existing openings 6' -0 "x 7' -0" $ 1,300.00 Each 2 $ 2,600.00 Provide new fire -rated doors at existing openings 3' -0 "x T -0" $ 850.00 Each 5 $ 4,250.00 Exterior Envelope Windows are 25 percent broken allowing water and air infiltration Remove and replace windows $ 12,000.00 Allow 1 $ 12,000.00 The existing roof slope does not meet the 1/4" per foot required in IBC 1507 Remove existing roof above structure $ 0.50 SF 40,000 $ 20,000.00 Install new roof with tapered insulation providing proper drainage $ 4.00 SF 40,000 $ 160,000.00 Exiting Stairs do not provide for proper handrail extension at top and bottom of stair. IBC 1003.3.3.3.11.5. Remove existing handrails $ 400.00 Each 6 $ 2,400.00 Install new handrail $ 25.00 LF 240 $ 6,000.00 Mezzanine Guard rails do not meet current code (space between bars) Remove existing guard rails $ 4.00 LF 500 $ 2,000.00 Install new guard rails $ 25.00 LF 500 $ 12,500.00 Provide new exit signage and emergency lighting $ 400.00 Each 8 $ 3,200.00 Fire Protection IBC Chapter 9 - Fire alarm system required in high -pile storage areas Update fire alarm system in storage areas $ 1.75 SF 10,000 $ 17,500.00 Plumbing Drinking fountain in entrance area is blocking path of egress Demolish existing drinking fountain and install code complying unit $ 2,500.00 EA 1 $ 2,500.00 Mechanical- Electrical HVAC system is insufficient for properly ventilating the garage space and for properly cooling and heating the office space Demolish existing HVAC system in office and garage areas $ 0.75 Allow 40,000 $ 30,000.00 Provide new HVAC (with electrical upgrades) for entire facility $ 10.00 SF - 40,000 $ 400,000.00 Edina, Minnesota Proposed Grandview TIF District Project No. 130163.00 Parcel 28- 117 -21 -31 -0016 - Public Works Facility Unit Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Quantity Total Electrical Insufficient power for upgraded HVAC, lighting system largely gutted or dated Demo existing electrical system and remnants of lighting $ 10,000.00 Allow 1 $ 10,000.00 Provide new service entrance and switch gear $ 1.75 SF 40,000 $ 70,000.00 Provide new branch circuits and lighting in portions of the building $ 7.50 SF 25,000 $ 187,500.00 Total Code Improvements $ 1,098,118.00 • JIM IMG-7664 IMG-7665 IMG-7671 IMG-7672 lNiG-1673 IMG-7676 IMG-7689 IMG-7690 IMG-7691 IMG-7677 IMG-7678 IMG-7682 IMG-7683 IMG-7687 IMG-7688 IMG-7692 IMG-7693 AL A x� a t IMG 7 94 ITIG 76 °5 It`, ^G 7696 IP.9G ?697 IMG 7698 IMG_7729 IMG_7730 IMG_7731 77/ IMG_7732 IMG_7733 � - '� � r 1 5 • if !1 '�l 'Pi IMG_7734 IMG_7735 I-- 1-L IMG 7739 IrOG 77:3 IMG_7736 IMG_7737 IMG_7738