Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013-06-04_COUNCIL MEETING
1 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 4, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL :1 III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of May 21, 2013, Closed Session of May 21, 2013 and Work Session of May 21, 2013 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 05/23/13, TOTAL $751,276.09; and Pre -List Dated, 05/30/2013, TOTAL $535,238.83 and Credit Card Charges Dated 3/26/13 To 4/25/13 TOTAL: $29,240.33 C. Shared Parking Agreement With YMCA For Yorktown Park D. Engineering Services — Evaluation Of FEMA Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations E. Agreement With Nine Mile Creek Watershed District For Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan F. Agreement With Minnesota Pollution Control Agency For Grant And To Purchase An Electric Vehicle G. Engineering Services — Public Engagement And Preliminary Engineering Services For 54th Street W And Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan H. 2013 Sidewalk Projects Prioritization List I. Request For Purchase — 2013 -2014 Salt Purchase V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Resolution Of Condolence, James Van Valkenburg B. Resolution Of Condolence, Marcella Daehn Agenda/Edina City Council June 4, 2013 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Fairview Southdale Hospital — Site Plan Review With Drive Aisle Setback And Parking Variances, 6401 France Avenue, Resolution No. 2013 -46 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING — Final Rezoning from PCD -3 to PUD, Planned Unit Development, Final Development Plan and Final Plat, Lund Food Holdings, 7171 France Avenue, Ordinance No. 2013 -6 And Resolution No. 2013 -45 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING — Receive Feasibility Study And Consider Ordering Improvements, Hazelton Road Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -417, Resolution No. 2013 -47 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Appeal From License Denial: Curtiss Delane Smith, Resolution No. 2013 -49 B. Resolution No. 2013 -48 Accepting Various Donations IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes I 0 Agenda /Edina City Council June 4, 2013 Page 3 1. Planning Commission, May 8, 2013 2. Edina Transportation Commission, April 25, 2013 3. Human Rights And Relations Commission, April 23, 2013 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Meeting of May 21, 2013 V. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -8 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3944 WEST 49 -1/2 STREET VI. RECEIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CONSIDER ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS, HAZELTON ROAD RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -417, RESOLUTION NO. 2013-9 VII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Jun 4 Joint Mtng with Edina Housing Foundation /BC Vacancies Tues Jun 4 Regular Meeting Tues Jun 18 Work Session —Joint Meeting with EEC Tues Jun 18 Regular Meeting Tues Jun 25 Special Meeting Tues Jul 2 CANCELLED REGULAR MEETING Thu Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Thu Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY PARADE 'rues Jul 16 Joint Meeting With ETC /Living Streets .jes Jul 16 Regular Meeting Mon Aug 5 Work Session — 2014 -2015 Proposed Work Plan & Budget Mon Aug 5 Regular Meeting Tues Aug 20 Work Session — Sports Dome Tues Aug 20 Regular Meeting 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10:00 A.M. 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 21, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Swemei; Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson Br-+nle made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle Swenran', approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.C, Access Agreement — 6137 Brookview Avenue; and, IV.F, Request for Purchase — Wooddale Re- Striping ENG12 -6NB, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of May 7, 2013 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 9, 2013, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $189,533.43; General Debt Service Fund $425.00; Working Capital Fund $4,451.90; Equipment Replacement Fund $14,619.70; Art Center Fund $8,118.41; Golf Dome Fund $298.63; Aquatic Center Fund $1,052.37; Golf Course Fund $31,662.11; Ice Arena Fund $50,256.72; Edinborough Park Fund $10,495.81; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $17,740.43; Liquor Fund $334,635.17; Utility Fund $388,603.41; Storm Sewer Fund $784.15; Recycling Fund $34,192.80; PSTF Agency Fund $4,659.45; TOTAL $1.091.529.49 and for approval of payment of claims dated May 16, 2013, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $124,260.21; Police Special Revenue $892.73; General Debt Service Fund $2,000.00; Working Capital Fund $16,454.21; Equipment Replacement Fund $4,799.80; Art Center Fund $2,448.80; Aquatic Center Fund $589.21; Golf Course Fund $26,180.18; Ice Arena Fund $24,701.88; Edinborough Park Fund $7,958.69; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,832.94; Liquor Fund $214,866.71; Utility Fund $37,281.03; Storm Sewer Fund $2,859.36; PSTF Agency Fund $2,721.16; Centennial TIF District $412.50; Grandview TIF District $3,147.15; TOTAL $476.406.56. 149 C Access AgF{.i%1ient — 027 grankisiew Avenue IV.D. Request for Purchase — 2013 Police Uniform Contract awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder Uniforms Unlimited at $2,463.00. IV.E. Request for Purchase — Contract ENG13 -10 Raw Water Main awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder Northdale Construction Co., Inc. at $139,741.01. IV.G. Request for Purchase — SCADA Radio System Upgrade awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder D2 Services, Inc. at $46,148.63. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.C. ACCESS AGREEMENT— 6137 BROOKVIEW AVENUE —APPROVED - Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 21, 2013 Park and Recreation Director Kattreh answered questions of the Council relating to the access agreement between the City and Paul J. Donnay Three, LLC. The discussion included the location of the proposed access (a small portion of Pamela Park north of West 62nd Street), the builder's responsibility to replace any trees, shrubs or other park property it damaged, and the planned location for the project dumpster. The dilsGI-119-369A VwhiGh P9Fti9R A-f P-RITIP-la PaFk, and potential less ef park Material Sueh , etc., and the plaRRed leeat*^^ FAff the a.,mpst °r. It was noted that the residents on the block supported locating the dumpster at the back of the lot, the risk of damage to public property would be minimized by locating the dumpster in the front yard. pFefeFFed leeatien for the a,,mpst„ r „'a ick„ i., h., i., the f.,..,. VaFd where there ,,w be th.- le-ast potential damage to PUbIi.... peFt.. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle 64AFea3ern approving the Access Agreement for 6137 Brookview Avenue. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.F. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — WOODDALE RE- STRIPING ENG12 -6NB — APPROVED City Engineer Houle answered questions of the Council relating to project to restripe Wooddale Avenue from Valley View Road to 50th Street W., in relation to the features and specifications of the design and the public notification process. There was discussion on "ghosting" of the dashes, chevrons, share the road sharrows, the width of the bike lane, and the encroachment of shrubbery into the bike lane that property owners would be requested to trim back. It was noted that the sharrows had been proposed as adopted by MBTC standards. These standards had been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Transportation Commission. Member Bennett expressed her concern regarding safety relating to the potential for speeding vehicles in the wider travel lanes and the inevitably recurring encroachment of the shrubs into the bike lane. She stated her preference was that the plan be amended to widen the bike lane /reduce the width of the vehicle travel lanes Feadway. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the Request for Purchase — Wooddale Re- Striping ENG12 -6NB awarding the bid to recommended low bidder AAA Striping Service Co at $32,874.00. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nay: Bennett Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. ANNALEE FRIEDMAN, MISS NORTH STAR STATE - RECOGNIZED Annalee Friedman provided information on her title as Miss North Star State, including her plans to help people learn to read and to ensure that no one goes hungry. She requested individuals interested in becoming involved to consider sponsorship and advertising in the National Pageant Book. Vl. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. NEW ON -SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES ROJO EDINA, DBA ROJO MEXICAN GRILL, 2750A SOUTHDALE CENTER, EDINA MINNESOTA - APPROVED Deputy Clerk Presentation Deputy Clerk Timm provided information on the application from Rojo Edina for new On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses. Rojo Edina had filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the licenses. Ms. Timm stated Edina City Code required a public hearing before the issuance of a new On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. It was noted the proper notification had been published in the Edina Sun Current and code requirements of all applicable City departments had been met. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing. Public Testimony Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 21, 2013 There was none. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett gr- iAdle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle met, approving the New On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday On -Sale Liquor Licenses Rojo Edina, DBA Rojo Mexican Grill, 2750A Southdale Center, Edina, Minnesota. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Jason Merritt, representing Rojo Edina, 1602 West End Boulevard, St. Louis Park, informed the Council about the anticipated restaurant opening date of June 10, 2013. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE VETERANS' MEMORIAL —APPROVED Recreation Supervisor Presentation Recreation Supervisor Aarsvold informed the Council about the request for an allocation of $38,500 for architectural fees to provide final landscape, architectural and engineering design services, construction documents, bidding assistance and construction administration for the proposed Veterans' Memorial. The $38,500 would pay the final services requested of SEH Inc. bringing the memorial into the next stage of design beyond the original renderings. The intent was that having the construction documents in place would facilitate the process of soliciting in -kind donations. Marshall Schwartz, 5528 Dundee Road, Veterans Memorial Committee, shared statistics on the number of Edina residents who were veterans and the pride of the veterans in the community. He stated the Veterans Memorial Committee strongly recommended to move forward aggressively with the proposed Veterans' Memorial Project. Bob Kojetin, 5016 William Avenue, Veterans Memorial Committee, informed the Council about the intent of the Committee to use the requested funds to finalize the SEH contract for construction documents that could be used to solicit in -kind donations as well as donations from the general public. There was discussion by the Council about the concern of going outside of the normal budget and capital funding process for approval ed of funding requests and the need for strategic direction by the Committee. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Mayor Hovland, approving a 50% matching grant, not to exceed $19,250, to the Veterans' Memorial Project to complete the SEH contract for project and design documents. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. GRANDVIEW COMMUNITY ADVISORY TEAM —DIRECTION PROVIDED Economic Development Manager Presentation Economic Development Manager Neuendorf requested direction from the Council on selecting members for the Grandview Community Advisory Team (CAT). The Council discussed the categories of membership planned for the Grandview CAT and the preferred process to select members. It was noted that the Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 21, 2013 and Transportation Commission categories had been filled. Council consensus was to have each Council Member put forward one name in the category of commercial property owner within Grandview, one name in the category of business owner or manager within Grandview, and two names in the categories of neighborhood resident and community resident. The information would be forwarded to Economic Development Manager Neuendorf as soon as possible. There was discussion on incorporating the following topics into future Grandview discussions: transit oriented development, existing development capacity, and potential . major infrastructure changes. Member Bennett requested that a listening session be held by members of the new CAT with previous participants in the first CAT and second -phase Steering Committee and working groups. There was alse VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -44 CALLING PUBLIC HEARING OF CITY COUNCIL — PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF GRANDVIEW 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT — APPROVED Economic Development Manager Presentation Mr. Neuendorf presented information on the proposed resolution to initiate the process creating a Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District by scheduling a public hearing to discuss the scope, nature and impact creation of such a district. Mr. Neuendorf stated the creation of TIF district was likely the best method to raise revenue to fund infrastructure improvements in this area. He stated the first step in this multi -step, multi -month process of creating a TIF District was to schedule a public hearing. Mr. Neuendorf said the proposed resolution called for a public hearing on July 16, 2013 to begin this process. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -44 Calling Public Hearing of City Council — Proposed Modifications to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan & Proposed Establishment of Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. SKETCH PLAN, 6500 FRANCE AVENUE —REVIEWED Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the proposed sketch plan for 6500 France Avenue. The sketch plan proposal was to redevelop the property at 6500 France Avenue. The previously approved plan for the site was a five -story, 62 -foot tall, 102,478 square -foot medical office /retail building with an attached 4 -5 level parking ramp. The applicant was requesting consideration of a change in use to 109 units of senior assisted living; and 100 units of transitional and memory care. Transitional care would include short-term stays by patients that who had surgery at Fairview Hospital or Twin City Orthopedic (TCO). The building would be similar in style to the previously approved building and five stories in height. A pedestrian skyway would connect the building to the hospital parking ramp to the north. The parking ramp would be removed and replaced with housing. The parking would be provided underground and there would be a 15,000 square -foot reduction in the structure footprint from the previous plan. Mr. Teague explained that to accommodate the request, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and PUD Zoning District would be required. The density of the development using 109 units of senior assisted living would be 46 units per acre, which would be on the higher end of high density residential development in the City of Edina. Counting the memory care and skilled nursing beds along with the assisted living, the density would be 80 units per acre. The transitional care could be seen as an extension of the regional medical uses of the hospital and TCO. Mr. Teague stated that the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal and generally believed that the use was a better fit for the site compared to the medical office; however, it was concerned with the proposed density and would like to see examples of Ebenezer projects in other cities and how other cities viewed these types of uses for Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 21, 2013 density. The Commission liked the skyway pedestrian connection to the parking ramp and hospital. Sustainable design was mentioned as an important component moving forward and the Commission also suggested consideration of providing some affordable housing units. Proponent Presentation Steve Michals of Mount Development, 3600 Minnesota Drive, informed the Council that the structure design, materials, streetscape features, height, and setback associated with this project would be similar to the plan that had been previously submitted and approved by the Council. He noted that the theater, bistro, beauty salon, community room, and dining room area would also be available for use by Point of France residents. He informed the Council that the City would be requested to approve a tax abatement pay -as -you go agreement to fund the skyway planned for the project. Mr. Michals answered questions of the Council on the anticipated timeline to break ground, the proposed location of the chiller, the background on the decision to change from the approved project to the current project, the proposed level of density, and the market study in relation to the penetration rate in senior housing. There was discussion on density and use and capacity limits in the area of the proposed project. Susan Farr of Ebenezer provided information on potential residents of the proposed project. She stated there were currently individuals who would like the option for this type of facility to allow them to continue residing in Edina. She answered questions of the Council regarding typical age qualifications for transitional care facilities and explained that the exact definition for this project was being determined at this time. Ed Farr of Farr Architects, Inc., provided an overview of the sketch plan for the proposed project at 6500 France Avenue. He noted that with the current proposed use, the entire block would consist of residential. He pointed out that there would be considerably less roof area than with the previously approved plan for the medical office building, the cubic volume of the facility would be about 25% less, and there would be fewer cars according to the traffic study. Mr. Farr and Ms. Farr answered questions of the Council in relation to potential accessories that might be included on the rooftop, such as plumbing stacks and a stairway. They discussed variable floor heights and square footage of the rooms anticipated for the project, service delivery schedules, and the potential impact of the loading dock /service entrance to the neighbors, screening and sound control planned for the mechanical oriented units, parking, and traffic flow onto 65th Avenue. Following review of the plan, positive comments from the Council were: the proposed use fits in well with the regional medical concept and the synergy with Fairview Hospital and Twin City Orthopedics; fewer cars and additional green space than with 4e4:� the previously proposed plan; and, spacious units. Comments of concern from the Council were: possible density concerns; particularly with respect to infrastructure demands and sufficiency and, the potential for wood burning fireplaces or fire pits that had been discussed previously. Requests as the plan comes forward were: providing specifics on the size of parcels /number of units in relation to examples of similar projects; importance on being a good neighbor; importance on addressing the affordability aspect with a percentage of the units; and, specifics on how the skyway and pedestrian movement would connect into the area of Twin City Orthopedic IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX. B. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMUNICATION —RECOMMENDATION Courtney Whited, Chair of the Edina Transportation Commission Transportation Options Working Group, provided an overview of the review conducted by the Edina Transportation Commission on the current Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 21, 2013 transportation options for Edina residents, particularly senior and disabled citizens. Ms. Whited also provided information on PRISM Express as the all encompassing option for any resident in Edina. PRISM Express does not have eligibility guidelines, does not require application, and does not require a wait period to ride. The cost to ride was based on a sliding scale fee based on the rider's stated income. Riders could be transported to /from any destination within their service area, which includes seven other adjoining cities to Edina, the vehicles were wheelchair lift- equipped, and the service was assistive door -to- door and was willing to grow and coordinate with other programs. Ms. Whited provided information on 1) PRISM Express' application for the Metropolitan Council's New Freedom funding; 2) funds available through Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging; and, 3) rider fares. She explained that on average, riders pay $3.50, while the true cost per ride to operate this service was $10.98 per one -way ride. Ms. Whited stated it was recommended that the Council authorize PRISM Express dial -a -ride transportation to expand into the City of Edina and to include appropriate funding, estimated in an amount of $10,000, in the 2014 budget, to cover a portion of the operating expense to do so. Council members discussed the recommendations of the Edina Transportation Commission regarding PRISM Express dial -a -ride. Following the brief discussion Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to forward the request for $10,000 to the 2013 Human Services Task Force for consideration with their 2014 -2015 budget requests. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX.C. MINUTES 1. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, APRIL 11, 2013 2. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, APRIL 9, 2013 3. PARK BOARD, APRIL 9, 2013 4. HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION, MARCH 19, 2013 S. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, MARCH 21, 2013 Informational; no action required. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received X.A. DATA PRACTICES REQUEST— COUNCIL MEMBER BENNETT Member Bennett explained that at a meeting with several Edina residents, the Metropolitan Airport Commission's Noise Oversight Committee staff had offered to provide data about runway use and aircraft flight patterns and altitudes. Kevin Terrell, a Minneapolis resident working with the MSP FairSkies Coalition, had prepared a request for the public data, and Minneapolis City Council Member John Quincy also was interested in obtaining information for his constituents. Member Bennett continued that NOC staff had offered to produce the data without a formal data practices request. Mayor Hovland questioned how actively the Council should be working with a citizen advocacy group and questioned FairSkies strategies. Member Bennett responded that because they are under the same flight paths, Edina residents share many concerns and interests with residents of Minneapolis and Richfield. She praised the FairSkies Coalition for providing information to Edina residents and for translating highly technical information into understandable form. 't , „ +„a +ti-,+ AACD P,,. -kce. Coalition ('Pair Skop—S'1 had- BrPmarpri , e,;+ E,,. - 711:1-1° Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:50 p.m. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 21, 2013 Respectfully submitted, Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 4, 2013. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the May 21, 2013, meeting available. MINUTES OF THE CLOSED WORK- SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 21, 2013 4:36 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 4:36 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: AFi Klugman, City M-,nage. into ; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; and Jay Lindgren, Attorney, Dorsey & Whitney. SESSION CLOSED Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett to move into closed session to discuss potential real estate acquisition 3944 49 Yi Street West at 4:36 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Economic Development Manager Neuendorf updated the Council on the status of the property at 3944 49 Y2 Street West. Mr. Neuendorf and Attorney Jay Lindgren reported on the potential acquisition of the property at 3944 49 Y2 Street West. The Council and staff discussed the level of interest, timing and potential purchase terms for the property. ADJOURNMENT Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Sprague to adjourn the closed session at 5:28 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 4, 2013. Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 21, 2013 5:34 P.M. 11/ICRIAIP_ /"/1A/1 /CAICII 1`1519ti9l;. - - -Ayes-. Bennett, °�,�„Findd le, SpFague, c,...,. sen and t,A. y9F LJ ....IA...a CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hovland at 5:34 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff attending the meeting included: Ann Kattreh, Park & Recreation Director; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Scott Neal, City Manager; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk; and John Wallin, Finance Director. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to receive an update on the 2014 -2015 Work Plan and Budget Process. 2014 -2015 WORK PLAN AND BUDGET UPDATE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Assistant City Manager Kurt presentation proposed process for development of the 2014 -2015 Work Plan and General Operating Budget including the process and timeline, budget challenges, tax comparisons, and HRA Levy. Ms. Kurt also explained the public engagement process that would be followed to garner citizen input. Ms. Kurt highlighted the following work plan themes the Council set during their May 3 -4, 2013 retreat: • Infrastructure 0 RNAV Workforce Commercial and Mixed Use Communications & Engagement Redevelopment Community Vision Assistant Finance Director Roggeman reviewed the timeline of the budget, and explained the three different citizen engagement events called "Financing Our Future" that will be held in June 2013. He explained the proposed HRA levy was allowed by statute, had some limitations on expenditures eligible to be funded by an HRA levy, and would be outside of any levy limits. Mr. Roggeman presented a listing of surrounding cities using the HRA Levy. Staff and Council discussed budget challenges to consider for 2014 -2015 including total expenditure requests by staff of $1.4 million, new full time staff requests, part-time staff levels, part-time staff healthcare, and general healthcare costs. Mayor Hovland thanked city staff for their hard work. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:56 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 4, 2013. Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/2312013 —5/2312013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 371291 5/2312013 .127125 AAKER, KRIS 75.15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 314954 051713 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ALARM SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5/21/2613 14:05:08 Page- 1 Business Unit PLANNING SEWER CLEANING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING CONTINGENCIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP. RETAIL SALES MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 75.15 371292 512312013 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 73.16 HOSE, CLAMPS 00001222 315048 1- 849235 5920.6530 73.16 371293 512312013 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 7,333.76 FLATBED FOR NEW TRUCK 00005797 314661 0136023 -IN 1553.6585 7,333.76 371294 512312013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 128.40 314988 1679191 5862.5515 128.40 371295 6123/2013 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 61.60 ALUMINIUM VENTING 00001212 314662 222034 1500.6406 61.60 371296 5/2312013 129458. ACME TOOLS 1,224.76 DRILLS, DRIVERS 00001165 314663 1885820 1301.6556 1,224.76- ,371297 512312013 131688 ADLER, LAURA 102.83 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 314664 051413 1260.6107 102.83 371296 512312013 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 104.22 ALARM MONITORING 314889 96935409 5111.6250 ' 104.22 371299 512312013 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. 829.86 BIKE BLVD DESIGN 314848 53989 1260.6103 829.86 371300 5/2312013 131974 AMG -SF LLC 76.80 SHOES 00006074 314955 0000758 -IN 5440.5511 76.80 371301 512312013 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 33,469.73 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 314849 10361627 -00 1130.6123 REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ALARM SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5/21/2613 14:05:08 Page- 1 Business Unit PLANNING SEWER CLEANING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING CONTINGENCIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP. RETAIL SALES MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS a i R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5123/2013 —5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 33,469.73 I 371302 512312013 116465 ANDERSON, TOM 98.61 - TASTING CUPS 314850 051613 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 5121/2013 14:05:08 Page - 2 Business Unit YORK SELLING GRILL ENGINEERING GENERAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT GENERAL SUPPLIES, GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION ARENA ICE MAINT 98.61 371303' 512312013 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 1,175.30 FOOD 314627 1927679 5421.5510 1,175.30 371304 512312013 101282 APWA 645.48 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 314890, 612495 -2013. 1260.6105 1,129.52 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 314890 612495 -2013 1280.6105 1,775.00 371305 512312013 101677 - ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 43.61 CEILING TILE 00008004 314973 10056816 5511.6406 43.61 , 371306 512312013 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 663.61 TEMPERATURE SENSOR 00005144 314665 10115945 1553.6585 663.61 371307 512312013 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I 192.32 ALTERNATOR 00005242 314666 153179 1553.6530 192.32 371308 512312013 126019 B & B PRODUCTS 1 RIGS AND SQUA 1 410.19 VEHICLE REPAIR 314851 3918 1553.6180 260.62 REPLACE SIREN SPEAKER 314852 3920 1400.6215 670.81 371309 512312013 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 2,900.00 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE PHASE 1 314628 23271292.00 -1 9232.6136 1 2,900.00 371310 512312013 102346 BEARCOM 43.05 WALKIE TALKIES 315049 4202760 1629.6406 43.05 371311 512312013 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 414.70 ZAMBONI PARTS 00008009 314974 00093866 - 5521.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 5121/2013 14:05:08 Page - 2 Business Unit YORK SELLING GRILL ENGINEERING GENERAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT GENERAL SUPPLIES, GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION ARENA ICE MAINT Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS:SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 3 VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINAA RECON CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINAA RECON COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS MATERIALS /SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES RICHMOND HILLS PK. Council Check Register 5/23/2013 - 5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 414.70 371312 512312013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 123.55 314989 78235900 5862.5513 113.12 314990 88431300 5822.5515 73.10 314991 78236100 5822.5515 89.55. 314992 78236000 5822.5513 945.85 314993 78235600 5842.5512 41.00 314994 78235700 5842.5515 55.60 314995 88431100 5842.5515 700.40 314996 78235500 5842.5513 77.60 314997 88431200 5862.5515 91.43 314998 6311200 5862.5515 31.14 314999 88431400 5860.6406 - 2,342.34 371313 5/2312013 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 805.00 SNOW REMOVAL 314956 140911 7411.6136 805.00 371314 512312013 .129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING 2,950.00 REPLACE WATER LINE 314853 8104696 05533.1705.21 6,370.00 REPLACE SEWER LINE 314853 B104896 03477.1705.21 9,320.00 371315 612312013 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 216.00 PIZZA 314576 319060 5520.5510 216.00 '371316 5/2312013 125139 BERNICK'S 352.00 314762 60096 5842.5514 352.00 371317 512312013 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 183.00 COFFEE 314577 1091354 5520.5510 67.50 COFFEE 314578 1091925 5520.5510 250.50 371318 512312013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 9.95 POSTCARDS FOR SURVEY MAILINGS 314854 OE- 316692 -1 01387.1705.31 9.95 POSTCARDS FOR SURVEY MAILINGS 314854 OE- 316692 -1 01386.1705.31 9.95 POSTCARDS FOR SURVEY MAILINGS 314854 OE- 316692 -1 01388.1705.31 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS:SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 3 VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINAA RECON CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINAA RECON COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS MATERIALS /SUPPLIES VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD MATERIALS /SUPPLIES VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD MATERIALS/SUPPLIES RICHMOND HILLS PK. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger- Account Description 9.95 POSTCARDS FOR SURVEY MAILINGS 314854 OE- 316692 -1 01385.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 9.98 POSTCARDS FOR SURVEY MAILINGS 314854 OE- 316692 -1 01368.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 59.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003180 314855 WO- 853039 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 109.36 371319 512912013 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 134,358.00 JUNE 2013 PREMIUM 314891 11006 -5/13 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 17,662.50 JUNE COBRA 314892 MAY 2013 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 152,020.50 371320 512312013 122688, BMK SOLUTIONS 65.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 314579 85203 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 33.10 314580 85284 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.23 314581 85374 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.43 314582 86193 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.58 314583 86236 1495.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 155.97 314584 86498 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 51.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001457 314667 86839 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 500.79 371321 512312013 131967 BOLLING S SONS 2,500.00 DEMOLITION ESCROW REFUND 314893 ED121137 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2.500.00 371322 512312013 119351 BOURGETIMPORTS 364.50 314763 113244 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 419.50 315000 113525 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 558.00 315001 113531 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE 1,342.00 371323 512312013 131732 BOWMAN, SUSAN . 66.00 GOLF PROGRAM REFUND 314894 PETER FLOM 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC 66.00 371324 512312013, 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 214.40 BRACKET 00005134 314668 106760SAV 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 210.18 SWITCH, PANEL 314669 739397 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 132.49 SWITCHASSEMBLY 00005245 314670 740193 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 22.98 CAPASSEMBLY 00005232 314671 742047 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 580.05 371325 512312013 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 512112013 14:05:08 Page- 4 Business Unit COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING PARKADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 5 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 249.87 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 371326 612312013 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 19.25 PETTY CASH 314895 051613 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.87 PETTY CASH 314895 051613 5422.6540 FERTILIZER 29.59 PETTY CASH 314895 051613 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, 31.00 PETTY CASH 314895 051613 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 44.66 PETTY CASH 314895 051613 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.00 PETTY CASH 314895 051613 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 52.50 PETTY CASH 314895 051613 5422.6540 FERTILIZER 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 5 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 249.87 371326 612312013 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 8,420.95 SEALANT 314672 12292190-00 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 8,420.95 371327 5/23/2013 121518 BUSHNELL OUTDOOR PRODUCTS. 187.19 MERCHANDISE 314896 189092 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 187.19 371328 512312013 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 426.30 GOLF CLUBS 314897 924393487 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 96.02 GOLF CLUB 314898 924393521 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 522.32 371329 612312013 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 13,062.62 LEGAL COUNSEL 315071 2851.4/13 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV -LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 13,062.62 371330 6/2312013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 47.05 314764 287904 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,355.70 314765 287908 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17,20 314766 287905 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,280.20 314767 287907 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 7,700.15 371331 612312013 130252 CARTER, JOEL 156.23 ART WORK SOLD 314950 051713 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 156.23 371332 6/23/2013 129923 CAWLEY 77.76 NAME BADGES 314585 V158059 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 40.78 NAME BADGES 314586 V159979 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 49.34 NAME BADGES 314587 V159981 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 167.88 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Council Check Register Page - 6 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371333 612312013 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 177.59 SHOVEL HANDLES, BRUSHES 00005219 314673 1315669 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 177.59 371334 512312013 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 67.59 314588 050313 5821.6186 HEAT .50TH ST OCCUPANCY 178.44 314588 ' 050313 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 227.50 314588 050313 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 304.74 314588 050313 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 308.73 314588 050313 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 313.41 314588. 050313 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 740.10 314588 050313 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 749.53 314588 050913 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 902.25 314588 050313 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 1,024.03 314588 050913 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,057.22 314588 050313 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,164.05 314588 050313 5420.6186 HEAT - CLUB HOUSE 1,281.48 314588 050313 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 2,381.64 314588 050313 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,568.85 314588 050313 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 7,095.78 314588 050313 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 20,365.34 371335 512312013 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 3,337.90 314899 2613592 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 88.71 314900 2614032 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 3,426.61 371336 512312013 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 166.28 ENVELOPES 314856 70966 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 166.28 371337 612312013 123898 CENTURYUNK 205.64 952 835 -6661 314589 6661 -5/13 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 107.10 952 835 -1161 314590 1161 -5113 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 58.24 952 944 -1841 314591 1841 -5/13 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 155.14 952 285 -2951 314592 2951 -5/13 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 59.26 952 9446522 315050 6522 -5/13 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 585.38 371398 512312013 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 698.96 SPONGES, CLEANERS, WIPES 314593 517529 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 698.96 371339 512312013 100683 CHEMSEARCH 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 7 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE ADAPTIVE RECREATION CENTENNIAL LAKES.OPERATING DARE 717.79 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 314975 1095597 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 717.79 488.72 ASPHALT 314674 371340 512312. 013 BLACKTOP 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 488.72 371345 27.94' 00101025 - 0203610011 314594 203610011 -4/13 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 344.16 550.23 00101025 - 0203600013 314595 203600013 -4/13 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 578.17 371346 5123/2013 101948 COUNTRY CLUB TURF 371341 5/2312013 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 936.23 BENTGRASS SOD 00002345 314901 1901 5761.6540 FERTILIZER • 230.60 315002 0188022606 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING i 122132 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC. 230.60 590.70 T- SHIRTS, DARE ITEMS 00003181 314857 371342 512312013 GENERAL SUPPLIES 131979 COHEN, MELISSA 590.70 39.58 IRRIGATION REPAIR 315051 052013 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 39.58 371343 512312013 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 1,271.66 TV AND WEB ADVERTISING 314596 NW492770 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,271.67 TV AND WEB ADVERTISING 314596 NW492770 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1 271 67 TV AND WEB ADVERTISING 314596 NW492770 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE ADAPTIVE RECREATION CENTENNIAL LAKES.OPERATING DARE 3,815.00 371344 512312013 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 488.72 ASPHALT 314674 043013 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 488.72 371345 512312013 101704 COOK, BARBARA 344.16 PROGRAM COORDINATOR SERVICES 314629 13 -1618 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 344.16 371346 5123/2013 101948 COUNTRY CLUB TURF 936.23 BENTGRASS SOD 00002345 314901 1901 5761.6540 FERTILIZER • 936.23 371347 512312013 122132 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC. 590.70 T- SHIRTS, DARE ITEMS 00003181 314857 54049 1425.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES 590.70 GENERAL MAINTENANCE ADAPTIVE RECREATION CENTENNIAL LAKES.OPERATING DARE R55CKREG LOG20000 314768 701056 5842.5514 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 22.40 314769 701057 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register 3,141.30 314770 701054 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5/23/2013 -5/2312013 701055 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 371348 512312013 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 95.21 2,709.66 GROOMER 00001002 314675 160116 1646.6556 TOOLS 92.66 314631 2,709.66 5421.5510- COST OF GOODS SOLD 56.40 371349 512312013 5421.5510 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. 44.22 314903 457897 -" 5421.5510 1,491.55 FIELD MARKING CHALK 00001129 314902 11882 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER ,. c� 1,491.55 512312013 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 371350 512312013 104020 DALCO PERMIT FOR MILL POND 314859 051513 5938.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 437.59 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 00001118 314676 2598933 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. 5123/2013 653.75 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 00001125 314677 2599692 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.60 650487671, 314976 43.82 PARK CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 00001118 314678 2599640 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 141.57 WYPALLS 00001454 314679 2602771 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 84.86 WINDEX•CLEANER 00001980 314858 2596867- 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES , 1,361.59 371351 512312013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 8 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,304.42 314768 701056 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22.40 314769 701057 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,141.30 314770 701054 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 790.75 314771 701055 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 66.30 314772 701053 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING PAYROLL CLEARING GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL MILLPOND LK VEGETATION CONTROL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 7,325.17 371352 512312013 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURAN 2,321.69 JUNE 2013 STD INSURANCE 314597 F018342 -5/13 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 2,321.69 371353 512312013 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 95.21 BAKERY 314630 457216 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 92.66 314631 457516 5421.5510- COST OF GOODS SOLD 56.40 314632 457667 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 44.22 314903 457897 -" 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 288.49 371354 512312013 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 47.00 PERMIT FOR MILL POND 314859 051513 5938.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 47.00 371355 5123/2013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 28.60 650487671, 314976 650487671 -5/13 5511.6188 TELEPHONE o' 28.60 PAYROLL CLEARING GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL MILLPOND LK VEGETATION CONTROL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Council Check Register Page - 9 5123/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business,Unit 371356' 5123/2013 123162 DISH 57.74 8255 7070 8142 2839 314957 050413 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 57.74 YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING MEETING EXPENSE 371357 512312013 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 521.89 FLOOD PLAIN MAILINGS 314860 5653 -01 5932.6103 521.89 371358 512312013 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC 224.00 314773 5692 5822.5513 224.00 371359 512312013 116926 DONOVAN, EDITH 90.00 ADDITIONAL TICKET 314904 ANYTHING GOES 1628.4392.07 90.00 371360 5/2312013 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 546.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 314946 051713 4077.6103 546.00 371361 612312013 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 55.53 SCREW ANCHOR 00001231 314680 09924000 1553.6406 55.53 371362 .512312013 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 198.33 DIRECTORY AD - EDINA LIQUOR 314598 33188 5822.6122 198.33 DIRECTORY AD - EDINA LIQUOR 314598 33188 5842.6122 198.34 DIRECTORY AD - EDINA LIQUOR 314598 33188 5862.6122 50.00 MEETING - DENFELD & NISSEN 314861 33198 1130.6106 645.00 371363 512312013 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 50.00 . EARTH DAY EVENT 315052 PERMIT 48307 1122.6103 50.00 371364 512312013 125152 EISERT, THOMAS 85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 314958 051713 1495.6104 85.00 371365 5/2312013 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 242.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 314862 00 -10683 10044.1705.21 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS CONSULTING INSPECTION LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 242.00 371366 512312013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 50.26 MOTOR PART 314681 69- 098107 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 251.30 BRAKE LINING KIT, ROTORS 314682 69- 098348 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 110.11 PUMP 314683 69- 098452 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 201.56 RADIATOR 314684 113167709 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 479.40 PUMP, GEAR 314685 69- 099204 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 69.95 FILTERS, OIL CAP 314686 69=099222 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 77.23 BATTERY - 31468T 1- 4174853 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,239.81 371367 512312013 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 312.16 SCANNING OF ARENA PHOTOS - 315072 8326063 -T2 -3240 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 77 312.16 371368 512312013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 3,384.93 METERS 00001175 315053 0018983 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 94.12 FITTINGS 00001175 315654 0019088 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 734.77 HAND READER 00001175 315055 0020260 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 721.83 METER COUPLINGS 00001175 315056 0020379 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4,935.65 371369 512312013 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 249.00 SUBSCRIPTION - BOB WILSON 314633 0055850 -4/13 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 249.00 371370 612312013 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 90.00 315003 6474 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 90.00 315004 6492 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 180.00 371371 512312013 131969 GAGE, SHERYL 180.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 314905 JR LEAGUE 5401.4592 GREEN FEES NINE HOLES 180.00 371372 512312013 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN 350.86 OIL 314977 42096 5521.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 180.00 WINTER TO SUMMER CHANGEOVER 314978 42095 5521:6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 530.86 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR ASSESSING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF REVENUES ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT CITY OF EDINA 5121/2013 14:05:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 5/23/2013 - 5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier. / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371373 512312013 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 360.00 MERCHANDISE 314906 11599830 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 360.00 371374 512312013 100773- GENERAL PARTS INC. 61.92 SCALE REMOVER 00001211 314634 1363380 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 253.63 SANITIZER, FILTER 00001156 314907 1363602 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 315.55 371375 5/2312013 119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL CO. INC. 3,800.00 DUCT WORK, PIPING 00001009 314688 06356 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 3,800.00 371376 512312013 100920 ,GENUINE PARTS 'COMPANY - MINNEA 44.82 PARTS 314635 043013 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 138.98 PARTS 314635 043013 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 674.05 PARTS 314635 043013 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 857.85 371377 512312013 103185 GERTENS 12.80 TOPDRESS SOIL 00001127 314689 275500 1644.6541 PLANTINGS &TREES TREES &MAINTENANCE 643.39 ARBOR DAY TREES 00001123 314908 275656 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 20.28 CEDAR MULCH 00001209 314909 276145 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 432.84 TREES 00001253 314910 277128 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE i 1,109.31 371378 512312013 131962 GLIEDEN, JOHN 5.00 ALARM BILL OVERPAYMENT 314863 REIMBURSEMENT 1406.4332 FALSE ALARMS - POLICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5.00 371379 512312013 129838 GLOWING HEARTH & HOME 45.62 PERMIT REFUND 314959 ED119468 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS ' 46.00 PERMIT REFUND 314960 ED120042 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS I INSPECTIONS 91.62 371380 512312013 1007111 GRAFIX SHOPPE 176.34 TRUCK GRAPHICS 314690 86874 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 176.34 371381 512312013 101103 GRAINGER 541.84 CABLE TIES 00001102 314691 9124519761 1642.6406 _GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE u 349.16 CORD REEL 00001130 314692 9130688097 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 775.75 CITY OF EDINA 371383 612312013 Council Check Register 100788 HILL MESABI 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 CUTTING EDGES c Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv.No Account No - Subledger Account Description' 79.08. FILTER BAGS 00001134 314693 9130894653 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.08 FILTER BAGS 00001134 314694 9130688105 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 171.68 WATER CARTRIDGES '00001135 314695 9130894646 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 197.21 WATER CARTRIDGES 00001135 314695 9130894646 5420.6406 • GENERAL SUPPLIES r 30.91 MEMO PADS 00005273 314696 9133960303 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES' 349.16 CORD REEL 00001130 314697 9136444206 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 34.99 MARKERS 00005243 314911 9134897850 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.61 r. SAFETY GLASSES 00005276 - 314912 9136053718 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT . 1,860.72 371386 512312013 100797 HAWKINS INC. 371382. 612312013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 8,799.94 CHEMICALS 00001250 202.25 3464056 314774 152378 5862.5513 , COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 573.50 314775 152379 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1318:6406 1318.6406 5710.6136 9900.2033.05 1550.6043 5915.6586 1553.6530 1553.6530 .1550.6040 -,- 1550.6043 " GENERAL SUPPLIES '. GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER LIFE INSURANCE - 99 COBRA INSURANCE WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS HOSPITALIZATION COBRA INSURANCE 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 12 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 775.75 371383 612312013 100788 HILL MESABI 9,477.35 CUTTING EDGES 314698 87783 8,227.02 CUTTING EDGES 314913 87836 17,704.37 371384 512312013 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 5/16/13 314961 051513 250.00 371385 5/2312013 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 7,520.13 JUNE 2013 PREMIUM 314915 6320897 -9 103.69 COBRA 314916 JUNE 2013 7,623.82 371386 512312013 100797 HAWKINS INC. 8,799.94 CHEMICALS 00001250 315057 3464056 8,799.94 371387 512312013 100798 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIPMENT 1,903.22 IDLERS, CONVEYOR BELT 00005224 314699 C81494 291.66 BELT ROLLERS 00005224 314914 C81458 2,194.88 371388 612312013 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS - 11,662.85 JUNE 2013 PREMIUM 314917 43398342 1,232.31 COBRA 314918 43394668 12,895.16 1318:6406 1318.6406 5710.6136 9900.2033.05 1550.6043 5915.6586 1553.6530 1553.6530 .1550.6040 -,- 1550.6043 " GENERAL SUPPLIES '. GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER LIFE INSURANCE - 99 COBRA INSURANCE WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS HOSPITALIZATION COBRA INSURANCE 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 12 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2013 14:05:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 371389 512312013 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC. 547.30 PAVERS , 00002346 314919 296454 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 547.30 371390 _ 512312013 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 314920 024530 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 371391 512312013 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,796.70 RADIO ADMIN FEES 314636 130438015 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL . POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,272.00 RADIO ADMIN FEES 314637 130438014 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 651.90 RADIO ADMIN FEE 314700 130438075 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,720.60 371392 5/2312013 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 4,533.80 NEW PCS 00004330 314638 52686902 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 156.05 MONITOR 00004331 314639 52699110 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 173.13 MONITOR _ 00004331 314639 52699110 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,862.98 371393 512312013 102483 HILTI INC. 943.05 CAULK 00001170 315058 4602594246 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 943.05 371394 512312013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 694.00 314776 647947 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,353.50 314777 648185 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.00 314778 647946 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,093.00 314779 647945 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,196.50 371395 512312013 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 114.70 ENGINEERING /PW SUPPLIES 314701 041213 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 270.94 ENGINEERING /PW SUPPLIES 314701 041213 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 636.12 ENGINEERING /PW SUPPLIES 314701 041213 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 1,021.76 371396 5/23/2013 122565 HYSER, TIMOTHY 156.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 314947 051713 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 156.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Council Check Register Page - 14 5/23/2013 -5123/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No . Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371397 512312013 _ 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 342.69 CHECK VALVE 00001917 315059 773462 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 342.69 371398 512312013 131548 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL 110.06 STOOL SEATS 00001966 314702 IN0270045 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 110.06 371399 512312013 104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 125.00 ICC ANNUAL DUES - 0184502 314599 2940510 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 125.00 371400 512312013 104696 INTL SECURITY PRODUCTS 213.75 FENCING PARTS 00001226 314921 3040603 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 213.75 371401 5/2312013 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 231.40 EXIT SIGNS 00001099 314703 S100372989.001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 231.40 371402 512312013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 139.65 314780 2084061 5922.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,971.44 314781 2084055 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 53.80 314782 2084049 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 65.80 314783 1970332 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 521.80 314962 2090918 5421.5514 COST, OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,948.70 315005 2084048 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,801.55 315006 2084066 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 38.80 315007 2084067 5842.5515 COST OF. GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.00 315008 2084068 5842.5513 COSf'OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 63.00 315009 2084074 5842.5514 COST OF. +GOODS'SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,622.54 J 371403 512312013 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 292.86 HERBICIDE, SPREADER STICKER 00001204 314704 64551872 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 292.86 371405 5/2312013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 232.92 314784 1568060 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,348.64 314785 1571984 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,881.97 314786 1571966. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3.36 314787 1571948 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 4,879.09 2,756.63 19.91 276.85 487.84 4.76- 51.37- 608.88- 10.00- 10.09- 266.03 94.11 3,250.41 3,686.30 3,125.48 5,149.71 2,285.02 4,062.11 1.12 59.99 1,135.16 1,845.35 572.35 995.66 31.37 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD: WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD. LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT UNIFORMS 5/21 /20 i:1 14:05:08 Page - 15 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST- SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING '50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA . Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 314788 1571947 5862.5513 314789 1571963 5862.5512 314790 1571945 5862.5512 314791 1571965 5862.5512 ' 314792 1571967 5862.5512 314793 576070 5842.5513 314794 576071 5842.5513 314795 576295 5862.5512 314796 575223 5862.5512 314797 575222 5862.5512 315010 1571960 5842.5512 315011 1571958 5842.5515 315012 1571961 5842.5513 315013 1571957 5842.5512 315014 1571959 5842.5513 315015 1571946 5842.5513 315016 1571962 5842.5512 315017 1571949 5822.5513 315018 1571950 5822.5513 315019 1571940 5822.5514 315020 1571941 5822.5513 315021 1571951 5822.5513 315022 1571942 5822.5512 315023 1571943 5822.5512 315024 1571944 5822.5515 315025 1571952 5822.5512 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD: WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD. LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT UNIFORMS 5/21 /20 i:1 14:05:08 Page - 15 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST- SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING '50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39,041.85 . 371406 5/23/2013 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 37.50 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 314951 051513 5110.6406 37.50 371407 512312013 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 65.55 BEARING INSERTS 00005223 314705 N349574 1553.6530 65.55" 371408 5/23/2013 130789 KATZ, DAVID 185.00 HOMETOWN HERO STORIES 314864 141 1130.6103 185.00 371409 5/2312013 111018 KEEPRS INC. 242.56 UNIFORMS 00003616 314640 216328 1470.6558 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD: WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD. LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT UNIFORMS 5/21 /20 i:1 14:05:08 Page - 15 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST- SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING '50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 INSPECTIONS 200.00 CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS 371411. Council Check Register EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 131963 KNIGHT, RACHEL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 DATAPROCESSING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 249.38 00003617 314641 217244 1470.6558: DEPT UNIFORMS 195.97 REFUND 00003573 314642 216728 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 444.33 TENNIS LESSONS REFUND 00003615 314643 216628 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 1,132.24 171.00 371410 5/2312013 131976 KLEMMENSEN, BETH 371412 512312013 200.00 JR GOLF LESSONS REFUND 314963 CANCELLATION 5401.4601 DRIVING RANGE 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 16 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT: GENERAL FIREDEPT. GENERAL GOLF REVENUES SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 200.00 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS 371411. 512312013 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 131963 KNIGHT, RACHEL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY-& ENVIRONMENT COMM DATAPROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.00 SAFETY CAMP PROGRAM REFUND 314865 REFUND 1600.4390.06 36.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 314865 REFUND 1600.4390.01 100.00 TENNIS LESSONS REFUND 314865 REFUND 1600.4390.02 171.00 371412 512312013 131966 KOTHRADE SEWER WATER & EXCAVAT 2,500.00 DEMOLITION ESCROW REFUND 314922 E6121013 1495.4109 • 2,500.00 371413 512312013 100845 KREMER SERVICES LLC 618.20 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 315060 24836 1553.6180 618.20 371414 512312013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 419.25 SCREWS, WASHERS, BITS 00005111 314706 9301615399 1553.6530 54.17 DRILL BITS 00005111 314707 9301618968 1553.6530 n 38.01 BATTERY CLEANER 00005111 314708 9301626106 1553.6530 416.19 BITS, WASHERS, SCREWS 00005240 314709 9301629935 1553.6530 927.62 371415 5/2312013 103217 LHB PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN 500.00 REGIONAL INDICATORS -2012 DATA 314866 120205.00 -1 1122.6103 500.00 371416 512312013 100558 LIND ELECTRONICS INC. 299.14 POWER SUPPLY FOR SQUADS 314923 281688 1400.6160 299.14 ' 371417 5/2312013 131975 LINDUS CONSTRUCTION INC. 212.20 PERMIT REFUND 314964 ED120893 1495.4111 ; - 212.20 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 16 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT: GENERAL FIREDEPT. GENERAL GOLF REVENUES SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY-& ENVIRONMENT COMM DATAPROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2013 14:05:08 _ R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 5/23/2013 --5123/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371418 512312013 101314 LITTLE BLIND SPOT, THE 177.00 SHUTTER REPAIR 314644 SNS21789 5430.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 177.00 371419 6/2312013 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 163.29 COPIER SERVICE 315061 1569170 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 163.29 371420 5/23/2013 101792 LOBE -TECH 507.74 GAS 00006137 314645 2203222 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 912.04 DIESEL 00006137 314646 2203230 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,614.93 GAS 00006136 314647 2203229 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 230.00- CREDIT 314924 522362 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,804.71 371421 5/2312013 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 153.50 DRUG KITS FOR EVIDENCE ROOM 314867 273607 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 153.50 371422 5/231201.3 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,149.55. 315026 152357 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,149.55_- 371423 5/2312013 131885 MAINSTREET BAKERY 50.40 HOT DOG BUNS 314600 218570 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 50.40 371424 5/2312013 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE.KARNOWSKI 2,000.00 2012 AUDIT 315073 33507 5932.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GENERAL STORM SEWER 2.500.00, 2012 AUDIT 315073 33507 5820.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT 50TH STREET GENERAL 2,500.00 2012 AUDIT 315073 33507 5840.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,500.00 2012 AUDIT 315073 33507 5860.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 9,500.00 371426 6123/2013 131057 MCF /LINO LAKES 20,175.00 WORK CREW SERVICES 314979 133238 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 186.00 WORK CREW SERVICES 314980 135685 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 20,361.00 371426 512312013 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 37.29 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 314710 051513 1240.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 37.29 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA - Council Check Register 5/23/2013 - 5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 371427 512312013 101483 MENARDS 103.54 BUILDING SUPPLIES 00008005 314601. 24683 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.97 RATCHET 00001032 314711 23421 1646.6556 TOOLS 75.21 HARDWARE 00001095 314712 23898 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 121.32 LUMBER, NAILS 00001124 314713 24500 1646.6577 LUMBER 170.88 LUMBER 00001140 314714 24649 1646.6577 LUMBER 154.73 LUMBER, HARDWARE 00001158 314715 24986 1646.6577 LUMBER 27.71 SHOP TOWELS, GATE LATCH 00001172 315062 25712 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 676.36 371428 512312013 102281 MENARDS 12.26 HARDWARE 00001024 314716 22082 1646.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.26 - 371429 5123/2013 131972 MGA HOSPITALITY 616.57 ` UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 314925 6809 CRESTON RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 616.57 371430 512312013 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 50.00 SUPPLIES 314926 34493 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS - 624.43 SUPPLIES 314926 34493 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES r. 961.00 SUPPLIES 314926 34493 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 1,635.43 371431 512312013 130635 MILLNER, CHAD 2,343.16 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 314868 051613 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 2,343.16 371432. 5123/2013 102441 MINING AUGER & TOOL WORKS INC. 828.28 DRILLING CONTRACTOR 00001169 315063 28487 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 828.28 371433 512312013 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 196.01 FOAMING HAND SOAP 00001218 314927 SOI -013363 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 196.01 371434 512312013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 857.50 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001171. 314717 34398 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 857.50 u 371435 5123/2013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS &SUBURBAN SEWER & 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 18 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION 'BUILDING MAINTENANCE UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 —5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,500.00 SEWER REPAIR - 6409 SHERWOOD 00002560 314869 34388 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,500.00 371438 5/23/2013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,500.00 SEWER REPAIR - 6400 SHERWOOD 00002565 314870 34387 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION ,1,500.00 371437 5123/2013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,500.00 SEWER REPAIR - 6417 SHERWOOD 00002566 314871 34389 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,500.00 371438 512312013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 5,320.00 SEWER REPAIR - 6417 RYAN AVE ()0002564 314872 34394 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5,320.00 371439 . 6/2312013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,500.00 SEWER REPAIR - 6525 SHERWOOD 00002567 314873 34395 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,500.00 371440 512312013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,400.00 SEWER REPAIR - 6325 PARNELL 00002562 315064. 34403 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2,400.00 371441 512312013 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 64.00 AIR BAFFLE 00005199 314718 1327480 -00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 64.00 371442 512312013 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 CERTIFICATION - PETER LUCHT 315065 CLASS B 5913.6260 J LICENSES & PERMITS 23.00 371443 512312013 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 25.14 MOWER PARTS 00001119 314928 0099012 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 95.42 GAUGE 00001206 314929 0099013 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 120.56 371444 5/2312013 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 190.58. BRAKE KIT, ROTORASSEMBLIES 00005226 314719 512504F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 190.58 371445 512312013 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 3,500.36 SPRINKLER HEADS 00006399 314648 897398 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 19 Business Unit NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 37,1446 512312013 371447 512312013 371448 612312013 371449 612312013 371450 512312013 371451 512312013 371452: 5/2312013 Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/2312013 -5/2312013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,500.36 100763 NEOPOST USA INC 297.00 METER RENTAL 314874 50154148 1550.6235 POSTAGE 297.00 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 54.00 FIREARMS TRAINING BOOKS 314965 5178 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 54.00 105968 NHA HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING 202.50 WELLTUNE -UP 314649 19606250 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 202.50 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 262.53 STEEL 00005227 314720 259223 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 262.53 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 165.83 LIGHT BAR FOR PLOW 00005124 314721 32996 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 664.42' LIGHTS, BRACKET ' 00005269 314722 33226 1553.6530 REPAIR'PARTS 70.91- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 314875 051013 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 759.34 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 2.64 PAPER 00006034 314650 1574354623 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.64 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 23.94 314876 W13040655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 23.94, 314876 W13040655 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 23.94 314876 W13040655 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 47.88 314876 W13040655 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 47.88 314876 W13040655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 47.88 314876 W13040655 5913.6188 - TELEPHONE 71.82 314876 W13040655 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 71.82 314876 W13040655 5841.6188 TELEPHONE _ 71.82 314876 W13040655 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 71.82 314876 W13040655 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 92.52 314876 W13040655 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 116.50 314876 W13040655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 119.70, 314876 W13040655 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 20 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PUBLIC PROGRAMS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY. YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG L0G20000 YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 371453 512312013 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 167.58 314876 W13040655 5760.6188 TELEPHONE 167.58 314876 W13040655 5710.6188 TELEPHONE 239.40 314876 W13040655 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 372.90 314877 W13040660 5420.6188 TELEPHONE i YORK SELLING 1,778.92 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 371453 512312013 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 8.36 CABLE 00001026 - 314723 516043 1646.6530 8.36 371454 512312013 101659 ORKIN COMMERCIAL SERVICES 1,692.86 ANNUAL PEST CONTROL 314878 9562094 -2013 1470.6103 699.03 ANNUAL PEST CONTROL 314879 6881124 -2013 1470.6103 I 2,391.89 371455 512312013 100709 ORNING, DAN 120.00 REGISTER PROGRAMMING 314930 051613 4075.6406 120.00 371456 512312013 104895 OVERHEAD DOOR CO. 194.45 DOOR REPAIR 00008012 314981 78901 5511.6180 194.45 I 371457 512312013 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 720.75 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 314931 50306 5761.6230 720.75 i 371458 5/2312013 129485 PAPCOINC. 196.44 MOP HEADS 314966 78214 7411.6511 196.44 371459 5/2312013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,955.80 314798 8399843 -IN 5842.5513 3,808.70 314799 8399857 -IN 5862.5513 1,206.51 314800 8399852 -IN 5822.5513 73.25 315027 8400107 -IN 5842.5513 7,044.26 37146.0 512312013 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 595.00 IT CONSULTING 314932 51113005 1554.6103 595.00 REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 21 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION SKATING & HOCKEY CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VANVALKENBURG ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 475.00 POSTER DESIGN CITY OF EDINA 051313 -1 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount I Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 371461 612312013 131970 PEDROLIE, CHERYL 100.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 314933 JR LEAGUE 5401.4601 DRIVING RANGE 126111 4607.6406 100.00 EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 766.63 371462 512312013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 371465 5123/2013 416.00 314801 10006835 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 715.61 80.00 314880 16327570 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 712.06 314982 16327569 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 314803 2423036 1,843.67 i VERNON SELLING' 371463 512312013 314804 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- . 22 Business Unit GOLF REVENUES YORK SELLING GRILL ARENA CONCESSIONS 475.00 POSTER DESIGN 314967 051313 -1 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 475.00 I 371464 512312013 119935 PET CROSSING 766.63 K9 EXAM 314651 126111 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 766.63 I 371465 5123/2013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 80.00 314802 2420408 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 181.73 314803 2423036 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING' 1,504.04 314804 2423034 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 176.74 314805 2423035 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 68.12- 314806 3504343 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 104.07- 314807 3503916 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,438.04 315028 2423033 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,604.27 315029 2423031 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 869.48 315030 2423032 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 642.08 315031 2423029 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 838.49 315032 2423027 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 321.08 315033 2423028 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 7,483.76 371466 512312013 124176 'PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 256.00 314808 18184. 5842.5515 - COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 256.00 371467 6/2312013 130174 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 3,370.50 FIELD PAINT 00001011 314724 INV474784 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 3,370.50 371468 5/2312013 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 —5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 195.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL 00005115 314725 210057943 1553.6583 5750.1705 7410.6218 1646.6406 4077.6103 5913.6180 1646.6180 1646.6180 5919.6180 421460.6710 5422.6545 1643.6540 5420.6530 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description TIRES & TUBES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS EDUCATION PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET PSTF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINAATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 195.00 i 371469 512312013 129592 PRECISION PLUMBING & HEATING 1 2,280.25 i PLUMBING REPAIRS AT PAVILION 00002344 314934 6035 2,280.25 371470 5/2312013 130860 PROTECT AND SERVE TRAINING LLC 3,250.00 i USE OF FORCE INSTRUCTION 314968 2013 -05001 3,250.00 371471 5/2312013 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC. 181.69 i EKCOSCREENS 00001037 314935 52861 181.69 371472 5/2312013 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 754.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 314948 051713 754.00 I 371473 5/2312013 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 110.00 PLUMBING REPAIRS 00001161 314602 15488 293.25 PLUMBING REPAIRS 314936 15603 992.45 PLUMBING REPAIRS 314937 15602 580.25 INSTALL NEW RPZ VALVE 00001174 315066 15628 1,975.95 371474 512312013 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 3,684.00 SIREN MAINTENANCE 314652 97359 3,684.00 371475 512312013 125936 REINDERS INC. 2,206.14 FUNGICIDE 00006400 314653 3019924-00 4,820.06 FERTILIZER 00001947 314726 3019508 -00 7,026.20 i 371476 612312013 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 427.50 TOILET REPAIRS 314654 61405 427.50 371477 512312013 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 106.81 PINTLE MOUNT HITCH 00005244. 314727 1927410630 106.81 5750.1705 7410.6218 1646.6406 4077.6103 5913.6180 1646.6180 1646.6180 5919.6180 421460.6710 5422.6545 1643.6540 5420.6530 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description TIRES & TUBES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS EDUCATION PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET PSTF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINAATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 ART CENTER REVENUES MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE CITY OF EDINA FINANCE Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 371478 512312013 1 10,1000 RJM PRINTING INC. 135.20 BUSINESS CARDS i 314881 76906 1550.6406 135.20 371479 5123/2013 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 140.95 SOFTENER SALT. 00003648" 314655 00283868 1470.6406 140.95 i 371480 512312013 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 419.86 1 PARTS'.WASHER SERVICE 314657 60613977 5422.6182 113.07 PARTS'. WASHER SERVICE 314728 929103147 1553.6530 532.93 371481 5/2312013 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 11.70 ART WORK SOLD 314952 051013 5101.4413 " 11.70 371482 5123/2013 129460 SAWYER, KYLE 24.00 MILEAGE / PARKING 315067 052013 1160.6106 33.75 MILEAGE / PARKING 315067 052013 1160.6107 57.75 371483 612312013 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 85.02 LUMBER 00001923 314729 41101174 1646.6577 100.14. LUMBER, NAILS 00001162 315068 41110737 5913.6406 185.16 371484 512312013 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 234.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 314949 051713 4077.6103 234.00 371485 512312013 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 788.58 I QUARTERLY BILLING 314938 8103459897 1628.6103 788.58 371486 512312013 131971 SCHULZ, ERNA 1,437.80 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 314939 051413 1470.4329 1,437.80 371487 512312013 128052 SECAP _ 282.35 POSTAGE MACHINE SUPPLIES - 314603" 81144632 1550.6235 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RUBBISH REMOVAL, MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE LUMBER_ BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register I 5/23/2013 —5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 28235 371488 5/2312013 I 100995 SEH 371492 512312013 i 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 630.46 RICHMOND HILLS RD PROJECT 314882 267647 526.34 I 314809 782.81 RICHMOND HILLS RD PROJECT 314882 267647 4,929.50 314810 836.93 .RICHMOND HILLS RD PROJECT 314882 267647 1,411.54 314811 11208.38 RICHMOND HILLS RD PROJECT 314882 267647 220.50 314812 431.54 INDUSTRAIL PARK LIGHTING 315069 268487 3,717.50 314813 3,890.12 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 371489 5123/2013 1032684 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK'SELLING 4,297.59 314815 I 129.87 PAINT 00001751 315074 09999 1,005.50 ! 314816 129.87 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. 50TH ST SELLING 371490 , 5/2312013 1032686 111824 SIDEKICK COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 342.50 315035 4,106.39 COMMERCIAL PLAN SCANNING I 314604 4491 16,582.00 j 4,106.39 371491 5/23/2013 131968 SIMON, JOHN 04387.1705.21 05525.1705.21 03471.1705.21 01388.1705.21 08060.1705.20 1301.6406 1495.6103 94 95 BASIC SKILLS SOFTWARE PROG 314940 FIGURE SKATING 5510.6105 CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN GENERALSUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5/2112013 14:05:08 Page - 25 Business Unit RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING GENERAL MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 94.95 I 371492 512312013 i 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 526.34 I 314809 1032680 5822.5512 COST OF.GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,929.50 314810 1032687 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,411.54 314811 1032685 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 220.50 314812 1030358 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,717.50 314813 1032683 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 90.41 j 314814 1032684 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK'SELLING 4,297.59 314815 I 1032682 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,005.50 ! 314816 1032681 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. 50TH ST SELLING 40.62 315034 1032686 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 342.50 315035 1034008 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLID WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16,582.00 j 371493 5/2312013 i 131956 SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL TECH 689.35 COMPOST - COMMUNITY GARDEN 314730 13344 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 689.35 i 371494 512312013 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 4,445.20 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 314605 1268 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 4,445.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 _ CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5123/2013 Check # Date 371495 512312013 371496 512312013 371497 5/2312013 37:1498 5/2312013 37.1499 512312013 371500 5123/2013 371501 512312013 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1646.6530 1646.6530 1553.6530 7411.6406 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES , 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 5510.6105 1120.6120 5821.6188 5841.6188 5861.6188 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ' ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS ADVERTISING LEGAL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE i 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 26 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION. ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ARENAADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 101004 SPS COMPANIES 130.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00001152 314731 S2722202.001 62.29 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00001201'314732 52722658.001 193.28 I 102371 STANDARD SPRING 41.18 U -BOLTS 00001890 314733 344372 41.18 i 114820 STRAUGHAN HARDWARE INC. 2,207.23 DOOR KICKPLATES 314969 225934 2,207.23 i 101015, STREICHERS 29.99 GLOVES 00003572 314658 11019216 29.99 i 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 143.99 TIRE 00005230 314734 10117155 143.99 i 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 45.47 PUBLISH ORD 2013 -04 314606 '1436633 493.62 i PUBLISH ORD 2013 -3 314607 1436632 58.46 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -20 314608 1436626 45.47 PUBLISH NOTICE 314609 1436627 45.47 PUBLISH NOTICE 314610 1436628 58.46 PUBLISH ORD 2013-01 314611 1436629 103.92 : PUBLISH ORD 2012 -19 314612 1436630 617.03 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -22 314613 1436631 142.89 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -23 314614 1436625 38.97 PUBLISH NOTICE 314615 1436624 255.00 BRAEMARAD 314616 1436732 84.44 I PUBLISH NOTICE 314617 1438108 1,989.20 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 42.73 PHONE LISTING 314883 050413 42.73 PHONE LISTING I - 314883 050413 42.74- PHONE LISTING 314883 050413. 128.20 1646.6530 1646.6530 1553.6530 7411.6406 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES , 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 5510.6105 1120.6120 5821.6188 5841.6188 5861.6188 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ' ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS ADVERTISING LEGAL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE i 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 26 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION. ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ARENAADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/'c., 14:05:08 Council Check Register Page - 27 5421.6180 5110.6103 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1550.6103 _ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit I 371502 5123/2013 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 314656 413540 - 772.00 314817 013413 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,323.00 314818 013366 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1 00500 314819 013433 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5421.6180 5110.6103 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1550.6103 _ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,100.00 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 371503 5123/2013 CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 314656 413540 40.00 371504 512312013 129564 TAKALO, CRAIG 162.00 AC INSTRUCTION 314953 051713 . 162.00 371505 512312013 i 130357 TASC 155.00 i COBRAADMIN FEE 315070 IN162802 155.00 i 371506 512312013 i 104932 TAYLOR MADE i 368.12 MERCHANDISE - 314941 19488507 368.12 I 371507 612312013 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 414.84 SAIL, COMPOST 00002333 314942 S173707 -IN 414.84 371508 512312013 102798 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 795.99 APR 2013 BACKGROUND CHECKS 314618 827166858 795.99 371509 512312013 I 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 449.00 1 314820 751349 187.35, 314821 752663 . 4,321.05 314822 752672 78.00 314970 00770897 5,035.40 371510 512312013 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 160.95 VET MEMORIAL MEETING MINUTES 314619 M19753 160.95 5421.6180 5110.6103 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1550.6103 _ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER . VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Council Check Register Page - 28 5123/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger. Account Description Business Unit 371511 512312013 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 135.32 SWITCH, BULBS- 00005246 314735 1067741 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 171.81 HOSE ASSEMBLIES 00005151 314736 1067739 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 307.13 371512 512312013 124532 TMS JOHNSON INC. . 80.46 AIR VENTS 00001227 314737 00110457 1500.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 80.46- 371513 512312013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 19.96. WELDING TIPS 00005236 314738 135626 1553.6580'! WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 206.20 - WELDING GAS 00005222 .314739 135625 1553.6580: WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.19 AN TIPS 00005226 314740 135482 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.02 WELDING GAS 314741 460231- 1553.6580_:" WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 30.51 WELDING TANKS 314943 460232 5761.6466..,.' . GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 315.88 371514 512312013 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 266.88 COPIER USAGE 314971 228188819. 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 266.88 371515 512312013 129403 TRAUN, MARK 390.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 314983 051713 -4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINAATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 390.00 371516 512312013 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 124.71 MOWER PARTS 00001025 314742 SI33392 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 28.60 MOWER PARTS 00001106 314743 TI22196 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 48.82 FILTERS 314744 JI73581 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 178.08 MOWER PARTS 00001098 314745 M103322 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 380.21 371517 512312013 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 1,737.19 LOCK SYSTEM 00008013 314984 574784 5511.6180 CONTRACTED.REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 703.06 DOOR REPAIR 00008011 314985 576834 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 263.63 DOOR REPAIR 00008010-314986 576890 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,703.88 371518 512312013 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO: 2,404.69 SEED MIXTURE 00006202 ' ,314659 29610 _ 5422.6543 ., SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 477.41 SEED, MULCH 314746 29627 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,882.10 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 371519 5/2312013 103973 ULINE 209.23 EVIDENCE SUPPLIES 314620 50915122 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 29 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE 5421.6406 209.23 GRILL 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 371520 5/2312013 COST OF GOODS SOLD 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,175.95 FIELD PAINT, FIELD RAKES 00001997 314747 104 - 0020378 LITTER REMOVAL 373.96 LACROSSE NETS 00001017 314748 104 - 0020446 CONTINGENCIES 1,549.91 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 371521 5/2312013 1500.6406 101908 US FOODS CONTINGENCIES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 318.38 CUST 43805514 50TH ST SELLING 314660 043013 50TH ST SELLING 561.26 CUST 43805514 314660 043013 3,263.30 CUST 43805514 314660 043013 4,142.94 371522 512312013 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 182.80 PAGERS 314621 W0319246E 182.80 _ 371523 512312013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 585.35 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 314622 272315 -00 588.35 CAN LINERS 00001126 314749 272093 -00 56.94 CAN LINERS 314750 272632 -00 1,230.64 371524 5123/2013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 47.99 TOGGLE SWITCHES 00001145 314751 7273449 178.22 METAL STUDS 00001200 314752 7281724 609.00 CONDUIT, MOUNTING BRACKETS 00001200 314753 7280446 153.90 BLANK PLATES, SWITCH PLATES 00001205 314754 7281677 989.11 371525 5/2312013 I 119454 VINOCOPIA 327.50 314823 0077335 -IN 185.50 315036 - 0077334 -IN 46.50 315037 0077333 -IN 559.50 371520 512312013 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 356.28 BULBS 00001128 314755 15224888 -00 304.98 BULBS 00001128 314756 15224888 -01 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page- 29 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1645.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 _COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 166.15 BULBS 00001220 314884 .15225398 -00 1322.6406 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM 5862.5513 5842.5513 '5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5822.5512 5862.5515 5862.5512 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 58225513 5842.5512 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST,OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5121/2013 14:05:08 r . Page - 30 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL MOWING ARENA CONCESSIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 827.41 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 371527 512312013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 120009 WALL ENTERPRISES INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 257.25 GRINDING WHEELS 00001084 314758 L- 242 -18 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 257.25 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 371528 612312013 130574 WATSON COMPANY 161.63 CONCESSION PRODUCT 314987 826345 161.63 371529 - 512312013 131973 WEBER, AMY 36.00 TENNIS SESSION 1 314972 REFUND 36.00 371530 512312013 101033 ,WINE COMPANY, THE 1,125.45 314824 330010 -00 854.85 314825 330000 -00 585.90 314826 330018 -00 2,566.20 371531 512312013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 2,385.12 314827 455510 3,056.48 314828 455507 2,266.87 315038 455505 408.48 i 315039 455509 784.96 315040 455506 8,901.91 371532 612312013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 5,965.77 314829 1080038859 1,432.99 314830 1080038857 72.00 314831 1080038854 3,056.60 314831 1080038854 2,787.06 314832 1080038855 1,584.25 i 314833 1080038860 1,080.10 314834 1080038858 100.91 314835 1080038861 250.00 - 314836 2080006643 15.00- 314837 2080006642 105.36- 314838 2080006644 2,176.15- 314839 2080005869 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM 5862.5513 5842.5513 '5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5822.5512 5862.5515 5862.5512 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 58225513 5842.5512 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST,OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5121/2013 14:05:08 r . Page - 30 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL MOWING ARENA CONCESSIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2013 14:05:08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 5/23/2013 -5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 68.00- 314840 2080005717 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 96.20 315041 1080038856 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 13,561.37 371533 512312013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 3,638.20 314841 1090046421 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 43.00 314842 1090046423 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 275.50 314843 1090046422 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 72.00 314844 1090045277 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 64.50 314845 1090045278 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,011.90 314846 1090045276 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,864.80 314847 1090045654 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,390.25 315042 1090048902 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 21.50 315043 1090048904 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,184.65 315044 1090048903 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 77.20- 315045 2090011795 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 119.30- 315046 2090005485 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 14,369.80 371534 5/2312013 116774 WOODLAKE NATURE CENTER 100.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 314944 ,_ SEPT 13 EVENT 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 100.00 i 371535 512312013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 629.50 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 314885 29- 01686 -170 04380.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION W 44TH ST RECON 1,782.00 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 314886 17- 01686 -250 01368.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON '35,851.00 FRANCE AVE PED CROSSING 314887 12- 01686 -300 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 706.00 GATEWAYAUARUPDATE 314945 1- 01686 -370 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 38,968.50 371536 512312013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 666.93 51i 5619094 -8 314623 367780561 1552.6185 LIGHT '& POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 15,490.28 51;5605640-1 314624 368147995 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 5,977.13 5145888961-7 314625 367784280 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 572.32 51- 4197645 -8 314626 367762595 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,315.66 51- 6227619 -3 314888 368323942 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 25,022.32 371537 512312013 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 3,361.55 FUEL 314759 . 553265 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 343.34 FUEL 314760 553844 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,151.80 FUEL 314761 553264 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/23/2013 —5/23/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6,856.69 371538 512312013 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 185.00 315047 12014 185.00 371539 512312013 103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER 19,117.07 2013 GMC SIERRA 00005810 315308 F33656 19,117.07 i 751,276.09 Grand Total 5/21/2013 14:05:08 Page - 32 Business Unit 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 751,276.09 Total Payments 751,276.09 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2013 14:07:22 Council Check Summary Page - 1 5/23/2013 - 5/23/2013 Company 01000 GENERALFUND I 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND ! I 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND i 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 07400 PSTFAGENCY FUND 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 09900 PAYROLL FUND Report Totals Amount 348,817.21 42,582.19 22, 801.07 1,421.78 92.52 112.65 24,955.83 35,005.13 3,862.58 8,481.97 172,169.37 67,565.83 3,828.85 6,837.29 2,900.00 9,841.82 751,276.09 0 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poiicie and procedures 61 - 0. 1 CITY OF EDINA 5/29/2013 7:41:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 5124/2013 —5130/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371540 512412013 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 2,443.10 PLAY STRUCTURE REPAIRS 315536 2358 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,443.10 371541 513012013' 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 135.60 315466 1679196 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 59.60 315570 1682325 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 99.60 315571 1682328 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 294.80 371542 513012013 129458 ACME TOOLS 436.90 HAMMER DRILL 00001286 315496 1935075 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 436.90 371543 513012013 101949 ADDED TOUCH 2,075.00 SAND & REPAIR POOL PADS 315378 AQUATIC CENTER 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 2,075.00 371544 513012013 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 73.24 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 315543 121266 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 73.24 371545 613012013 106991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 174.54 COFFEE 315379 156643 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 174.54 371546 513012013 132048 AMERICAN LEGION POST 320 120.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE AD 315497 BRAEMAR GOLF 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 120.00 371547 513012013 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 1,023.07 COPIER PAPER 315631 10362504 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,023.07 371548 513012013 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 814.41 CONCESSION PRODUCT 315380 1931966 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,142.89 FOOD 315498 1931914 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,957.30 371549 5/3012013 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 404.06 COFFEE 315313 1073778 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 404.06 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Council Check Register Page - 2 5/24/2013 -5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger.- Account Description -- Buslness,Unit 371550 513012013 124292 ARCHER, RYAN 186.00 MERCHANDISE 315499 105 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 186.00 371551 513012013 132032 'ARNDT; SARAH 100.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 315419 CANCELATION 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 371552 513012013 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,389.00 315572 21460 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 914.00 315573 21461 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,303.00 371553 513012013 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 25.93 IPAD SERVICE 315381 267240706569X05 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 1713 25.93 371554 5/30/2013 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. - 340.50 INTERACTIVE GIS MAPPING 315632 23271068.00 -11 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 11,895.69 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 315633 23271292.01 -1) 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 12,236.19 371555 513012013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 97.55 315433 78235800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD-LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 334.01 315467 88362200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING . 61.50 315574 78336300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 87.19 315575 88470200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 452.20 315576 78336400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 301.55 315577 78335900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 121.55 315578 78336100 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,455.55 371556 513012013 125139 BERNICK'S 619.15 315579 61471 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 165.55 315580 61469 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 784.70 371557 513012013 100648 - BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 76.93 LABELS 315309 OE- 318709 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 434.45 EASELS, PADS, MARKERS 315310 - 0E- 319070 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL . 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 3 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FINANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 371563 5130/2013 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 39.70 PATCH FOR SLIDE 00002140 315382 12304783 -00 5311.6406 39.70 Council Check Register 5130/2013 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 5/24/2013 -5/30/2013 AG -LIME FOR FIELDS 315324 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 371565 513012013 207.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES .315311 WO- 854447 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 787.67 JUNE 2013 NEWSLETTER 00008286 315383 126.37 STAPLES, FILE JACKETS 315312 WO- 854405 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.93 CASH REGISTER ROLLS 00009259 315431 OE- 319320 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 855.91 GOLF CLUB 315503 924406598 5440.5511 371558 513012013 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 27.15 PADLOCK 315410 S81650 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.15 371559 513012013 102645' BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 41;899.00 LOG10•Kl PREMIUM 315500 052013 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 1,206.00 LOG10 -S3 PREMIUM 315501 6/2013 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 43,105.00 371560 513012013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 131.34 DESK ORGANIZERS, MARKERS 315502 87029 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 131.34 371561 513012013 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,066.43 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003619 315544 60208587 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 293.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003619 315545 81078467 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 73.59 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003619 315546 81080951 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 1,433.92 371562 513012013 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 3 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FINANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 371563 5130/2013 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 39.70 PATCH FOR SLIDE 00002140 315382 12304783 -00 5311.6406 39.70 .371564 5130/2013 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 1,063.40 AG -LIME FOR FIELDS 315324 051513 1642.6542 1,063.40 371565 513012013 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 787.67 JUNE 2013 NEWSLETTER 00008286 315383 31292 1628.6575 787.67 371566 513012013 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 126.17 GOLF CLUB 315503 924406598 5440.5511 GENERAL SUPPLIES INFIELD MIXTURE PRINTING POOL OPERATION FIELD MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS COST OF GOODS -:PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/24/2013 -5/3012013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 126.17 371567 513012013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page- 4 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 282.25 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 315434 288800 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,909.70 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 315435 291689 5842.5514 104.55 315436 291688 5842.5515 17.20 315469 291692 5822.5515 445.60 315581 291691 5822.5514 1,200.40 315640 294222 5842.5514 5,959.70 371568 513012013 112561 _ CENTERPOINT ENERGY 929.33 8034001 -1 315314 8034001 -5/13 1552.6186 80.52 5596524 -8 315418 5596524 -5/13 5430.6186 680.08 5584304 -9 315565 5584304 -5/13 7411.6186 145.85- 5590919 -6 315566 5590919 -5/13 7413.6582 23.63 5584310 -6 315567 5584310 -5/13 7413.6186 1,859.41 371569 513012013 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 151.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 315315 71022 1130.6575 151.46 ENVELOPES 315316 71024 1550.6406 302.46 371570 513012013 - 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 4,710.90 00103426- 0345052006 315325 345052006 -5/13 1552.6189 46.58 00086676- 0330288022 315384 86676 -5/13 5310.6189 421.94 00105263- 0335037016 315504 335037016 -5/13 5430.6189 413.53 00113607 - 0342163045 315547 342163045 -5/13 1470.6189 5,592.95 371571 513012013 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 175.28 SCBA CLEANER 00003629 315548 149731 1470.6511- 1,101.25 GAS MONITOR MAINTENANCE 315549 149780 1470.6215 1,276.53 371572 613012013 132040 COLWELL, JACKIE 99.00 PROGRAM REFUND 315421 CANCELATION 1600.4390.29 99.00 371573' 5/3012013 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 776.64 MERCHANDISE 315505 92372048 5440.5511 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page- 4 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD, MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COST OF GOODS = PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/24/2013 -5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description SALE OF WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING. EXPENSE 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 5 Business Unit UTILITY REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 776.64 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 371574 513012013 VERNON SELLING 132030 D & D SERVICES OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,090.00 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 315326 052113 5901.4626 1,090.00 371575 513012013 104020 DALCO 153.90 INDUSTRIAL HAND CLEANER 00001118 315327 2603831 1646.6406 74.71 ANTIBACTERIAL CLEANER 00001118 315328 2604400 - 1646.6406 228.61 371576 513012013 102285 DAVANNIS 132.44 DINNER FOR RESCUE CREW 315550 222052 -C 1470.6106 132.44 371577 513012013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,292.55 315437 702017 5842.5514 87.80 315582 702015 5862.5515 2,398.75 315583 702014 5862.5514 2,108.40 315584 702016 5822.5514 6,887.50 371578 5/3012013 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 187.02 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 315385 052113 1130.6107 187.02 371579 513012013 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 61.13 BAKERY 315506 458253 5421.5510 63.74 315507 458313 -5421.5510 44.34 315508 458311 5421.5510 169.21 371580 5130/2013 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 230.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001264 315329 09939600 1322.6406 230.50 371581 5/3012013 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 60.00 APRIL 2013 TICKETS 315420 TASTE OF EDINA 5822.6122 210.00 APRIL 2013 TICKETS 315420 TASTE OF EDINA 5842.6122 270.00 APRIL 2013 TICKETS 315420 TASTE OF EDINA 5862.6122 600.00 MAY 2013 TICKETS 315420 TASTE OF EDINA 5822.6122 1,590.00 MAY 2013 TICKETS 315420 TASTE OF EDINA 5862.6122 SALE OF WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING. EXPENSE 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 5 Business Unit UTILITY REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/2412013 -- 5/3012013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2.730.00 MAY 2013 TICKETS 315420 TASTE OF EDINA 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 25.00 MEETING - BILL NEUENDORF 315634 33237 9232.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page- 6 Business Unit YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS FLOWRIDER POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WATER METER REPLACEMENT ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.00 TRAVELIN TEENS REFUND 315318 OWEN GORDON 1600.4390.31 TRAVELIN TEENS 92.00 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5,485.00 371582 5130/2013 104645 EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL 124.00 FLOWERS FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK 315509 052013 5720.6620 124.00 371583 513012013 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 2,217.10 INSTALL PUMP - FLOWRIDER 00002122 315386 0049817 -IN 5330.6180 2,217.10 371584 513012013 106035 FASTENALCOMPANY 47.81 NUTS, BOLTS 00002128 315387 MNTC2117484 5311.6406 159.58 NUTS & BOLTS 00002128 315388 MNTC2117516 5311.6406 207.39 - 371585 513012013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 149,871.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 315510 053113 05536.1705.30 149,871.80 371586 513012013 119211 FIRSTLAB .. 439.45 DOT DRUG TESTING 315317 00648076 1550.6121 439.45 371587 5130/2013 101475 FOOTJOY i 66.81 SHOES 315511 4962977 5440.5511 66.81 371588 613012013 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP,TOWELS 315412 1006492264 5422.6201 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 315413 1006514730 5422.6201 30.00 37.1589 513012013 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. i 261.63 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 315389 1364155 5311.6406 201.63 371590 613012013 132029 GORDON, SARA TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page- 6 Business Unit YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS FLOWRIDER POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WATER METER REPLACEMENT ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.00 TRAVELIN TEENS REFUND 315318 OWEN GORDON 1600.4390.31 TRAVELIN TEENS 92.00 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 371593 513012013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100785 GREUPNER, JOE CITY OF EDINA GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,067.00 GOLF LESSON - CLASSES 315414 052213 5410.6132 Council Check Register GOLF LESSON CLASSES 315414 052213 5410.6132 5/24/2013 —5/30/2013 11,950.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 371591 513012013 132039 HARDIE, JANIS 101103 GRAINGER 32.50 TANK FITTING, ELBOW 00005247 315330 9138536363 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 511.80 WRENCH, GLOVES, EAR MUFFS 00006203 315411 9137224698 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 821.23 CORD REEL 00001215 315551 9136741916 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,365.53 1,625.00 VALVE BOX CONTROLLER 00001008 371592 5/30/2013 160001906 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,625.00 371593 513012013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100785 GREUPNER, JOE PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,067.00 GOLF LESSON - CLASSES 315414 052213 5410.6132 10,883.00 GOLF LESSON CLASSES 315414 052213 5410.6132 11,950.00 371594. 5/30/2013 132039 HARDIE, JANIS 99.00 PROGRAM REFUND 315422 CANCELATION 1600.4390.29 99.00 371595 513012013 130116 HARRIS CONTRACTING COMPANY 1,625.00 VALVE BOX CONTROLLER 00001008 315331 160001906 1500.6406 1,625.00 371596 513012013 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,524.12 JUNE 2013 315552 6330722 -7 9900.2033.16 3,524.12 371697 6130/2013 128367 HEFTY GRAPICS INC. 87.97 SCHEDULING BOOK 315390 1305032 5310.6513 87.97 371598 5130/2013 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 315512 024546 5421.5510 153.12 371599 513012013 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 350.45 SOAP, SANITIZER 00002134 315391 .- 600682305 5720.6511 350.45 371600 513012013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 270.00 315438 648427 5842.5514 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page- 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS.SOLD GRILL CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/5/13: 315541 CITY OF EDINA 150.00 Council Check Register 371604 5130/2013 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 5/2412013 -5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No RECESSED CAN, TRIM 00001122 315333 1,903.50 1500.6406 315471 649203 5842.5514 315334 S100372798.003 3,070.37 1 1 315586 648911 5862.5514 867.38 315587 648972 5822.5514 - 6,111.25 CONSULTING SERVICES 315553 #3 1470.6103 371601 5130/2013 132028 HOPKINS, BELINDA 371606 513012013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST.'OF MINN 105.00 MINI HAWKS PROG REFUND 315319 TORI HOPKINS 1600.4390.22 315439 105.00 5842.5514 151.80 371602 513012013 5430.5514 119808 INTEGRA 9.866.30 315588 2084107 5842.5514 27.74 PHONE/INTERNET 315568 10909932 _ 7411.6188 5822.5515 27.74 - 315590 2036253 5842.5514 371603 513012013 127942 ISLES, BILL AND KATE, 2084106 5842.5514 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER MINI HAWKS TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER' GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALS UPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page- 8 Buslness Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 126.09 HERBICIDE 00006401 315415 64581414 5431.6545 CHEMICALS 217.77 IRON -00006402 315416 64584266 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 343.86 YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/5/13: 315541 051513 5760.6136 _ 150.00 371604 5130/2013 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 124.78 RECESSED CAN, TRIM 00001093 315332 ,Sl00372798.001 1500.6406 103.89 RECESSED CAN, TRIM 00001122 315333 S100376831.001 1500.6406 94.31 PUSH BUTTON HOLDERS 00001093 315334 S100372798.003 1500.6406 322.98 371605 6/3012013 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 875.00- CONSULTING SERVICES 315553 #3 1470.6103 875.00 371606 513012013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST.'OF MINN - 123.25 315439 2084075 5842.5514 151.80 315513 2036700 5430.5514 9.866.30 315588 2084107 5842.5514 38.80 315589 2084097 5822.5515 226.80 - 315590 2036253 5842.5514 95.96- 315591 2084106 5842.5514 9,211.90 315641 2084091 5862.5514 75.60 315642 2036271 5862.5514 19,598.49 371607 513012013 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. MINI HAWKS TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER' GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALS UPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page- 8 Buslness Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 126.09 HERBICIDE 00006401 315415 64581414 5431.6545 CHEMICALS 217.77 IRON -00006402 315416 64584266 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 343.86 YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Council Check Register Page - 9 5124/2013 -5130/2013 Check # Date Amount- Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371609 513012013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,290.26 315472 1577459 5862.5513 COST-OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,368.41 315473 1577475 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 09 315474 1577455 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 193.96 315475 1577478 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 143.24 315476 1577460 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,779.44 315477 1577477 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .56 315478 1577452 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,561.91 315479 1577474 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 163.95 315592 1577449 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,138.57 315593 1577450 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 501.52 315594 1577456 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,049.09 315595 1577463 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 283.85 315596 1577457 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10,148.68 315597 1577470 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING ,93 315598 1577453 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,12 315599 1577454 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,001.67 315600 1577468 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 983.84 315601 1577462 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,119.43 315602 1577472 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 300.00 315603 1575050 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,650.95 315604 1577469 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,12 315605 1577451 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 62.74 315606 1577471 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,154.27 315607 1577473 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD.LI000R YORK SELLING 2,118.46 315608 1577461 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 39.42- 315609 576868 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 81.70- 315610 576867 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 382.06 315643 1577849 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 45,279.00 371610 613012013 129918 JOHNSON, BRIAN -80.12 GIFT INK PENS 315569 REIMBURSE 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 80.12 371611 513012013 111018 KEEPRS INC. 36.99 UNIFORMS 00003618 315554 217227. 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 80.49 UNIFORMS 00003617 315555 217244 -01 - 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 117.48 371612 5/3012013 131976 KLEMMENSEN, BETH CITY OF EDINA 5/29/2013 7:41:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Councit Check Register Page - 10 5/24/2013 —5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 24.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 315556 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 99.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 315556 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 123.00 l 371613 5/3012013 100852' LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 334.70 NUTS, WASHERS, RIVETS 00001867 315335 9301528891 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 334.70 371614 5/3012013 104670 LAWYER NURSERY INC. 222.75 TREE PLANTINGS 315336 10140056 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 222.75 371615 5/3012013 132034 LEE, RACHEL 77.00 PROGRAM REFUND 315423 FAB 4 & 51 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 77.00 371616 513012013 113952 LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC. 50.94 HAND STRAP 00002533 315635 93494439 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 50.94 371617 513012013 129078 LIDKE, MARK 76.12 EPAC SUPPLIES REFUND 315432 052113 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 76.12 371618 513012013 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 2,360.00 FIRST AID TRAINING 315514 LL -4822 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,360.00 371619 513012013 130014 LIGHTING HOUSE USA INC. 2,000.00 LIGHTING ANALYSIS 315392 20101 5700.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 2,000.00 371620 513012013 100858 LOGIS - 1,759.00 SYSTEM SUPPORT 315393 36707 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,717.00 SYSTEM SUPPORT 315393 36707 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING' ADMINISTRATION 3,289.00 SYSTEM SUPPORT 315393 36707 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING -CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,336.00 SYSTEM SUPPORT 315393 36707 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,406.00 SYSTEM SUPPORT 315393 36707 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,591.00 SYSTEM SUPPORT 315393 36707 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,384.00 SYSTEM SUPPORT 315393; 36707 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 3,821.32 INSIGHT LICENSES 315394 36786 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 32,303.32 CITY OF EDINA 5/29/2013 7:41:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 5/24/2013 -5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371621 613012013 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 69.63 WELLNESS SUPPLIES 315636 052413 1513.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 69.63 371622 513012013 101146 MATRIX 330.35 315395 608122764 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 330.35 371623 5/3012013 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 1,850.09 SOFTWARE AGREEMENT 315396 14129 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOLADMINISTRATION 1,850.09 371624 513012013 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,257.50 RED WING TROLLEY TOUR 315637 052213 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,257.50 I 371625 513012013 101483 MENARDS 28.85 SNAP TOGGLE BOLT 00001151 315337 24965 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 61.31 LEAKPROOF DROP, PAINT PAILS 00001238 315338 25522 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 13.50 DRYWALL, SCREWS 00001232 315339 25312 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 133.78 HARDWARE 00001258 315340 25730 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8.27 QUALITY BOARD 00001141 315515 24655 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 245.71 371626 513012013 101987 MENARDS 20.94 HAND RAIL BRACKETS 00001094 315516 9386 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 87.69 MULCH 00002141 315517 11003 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 210.34 WEED & FEED, HOSE, MULCH 00002141 315518 10985 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 55.60 MULCH 00002143 315519 11080 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 374.57 371627 5/3012013 100885 METRO SALES INC 947.08 MFP FOR AQUATIC CENTER USE 315320 66999A 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,533.00 IT PRINTER REPLACEMENT 315320 66999A 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,841.23 MFP FOR EDINBOROUGH USE 315320 66999A 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 5,321.31 371628 513012013 104650 MICRO CENTER 178.45 AV SUPPLIES 315397 4467168 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 178.45 CITY OF EDINA 5/29/2013 7:41:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 5124/2013 —5130/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 371629 5130/2013 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 354.24 TOWELS, TISSUE 00003624 315557 24496 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 354.24 " 371630 513012013 123849 MILLER, KARIN 100.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 315424 CANCELATION " 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 371631 5130/2013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS &SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,500.00 SEWER REPAIR - 6517 SHERWOOD 00002569 315341 34404 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 1,500.00 371632 513012013 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 , STATEWIDE HOSPITALITY FEE 315321 50245 -2013 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG 35.00 371633 613012013 100906 MT1 DISTRIBUTING INC. 2,498.36 REPAIRS TO MOWERS 00002348 315520 882212 -00 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,498.36 _ 371634 513012013 132033 MURPHY, SAYOMI 9.00 CLASS REFUND 315425 ART CENTER 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 9.00 371635 513012013 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 275.00 315480 81848 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 380.50 315611 81847 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 655.50 371636 513012013 132050 NWHSU 375.00 BRAEMAR ROOM CANCELATION 315521 REFUND 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 375.00 371637 513012013 132036 O'MEARA, KELLY 38.00 PROGRAM REFUND 315426 CANCELATION 1600.4390.29 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 38.00 371638 513012013 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 2,300.00 WATER REPAIR 00002553 315342 3030 05533.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINAA RECON 4,365.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002553 315342 3030 03477.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINAA RECON 6,665.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5/24/2013 -5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 371639 5130/2013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50.16 PERMIT REFUND 315638 ED121173 1495.4114 50.16 371640 513012013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,654.33 315440 8400830 -IN 5862.5513 895.13 315441 8400806 -IN 5842.5513 91.25 315442 8400838 -IN 5842.5512 766.06 315612 8400816 -IN 5822.5513 4,406.77 371641 513012013 124366 PEARSON, JACK 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/6/13 315542 051513 5760.6136 200.00 371642 5/3012013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 204.72 -- 315398 16327565 5730.5510 921.78 315522 16327635 5421.5510 1,126.50 371643 513012013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 45.60 315481 2426515 5862.5513 439.44 315482 2426524 5862.5513 2,249.73. 315483 2426522 5862.5513 579.22 315484 2426523 5862.5512 5.17- 315485 3504693 5842.5513 5.17- 315486 3504694 5842.5513 8.33- 315487 3504695 5842.5513 62.52- 315488 3504696 5842.5513 61.50- 315489 3504697 5842.5513 1,696.52 315613 2426513 5822.5513 674.72 315614 2426517 5822.5513 278.78 315615 2426516 5822.5512 2,142.75 315616 2426519 5842.5513 246.96 315617 2426514 5842.5513 864.21 315618 2426521 5842.5513 624.54 315619 2426520 5842.5512 9,699.78 371644 513012013 100953 PHYSIO - CONTROL INC. 150.70 CASE FOR AED 00002135 315399 114003592 5310.6610 900.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003614 315558 114005907 1470.6510 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 13 Subledger Account Description Business Unit HEATING PERMITS INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 733.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA 1500.6406 371652 513012013 CONTINGENCIES Council Check Register SCAN AIR FILTER INC. CONTINGENCIES 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 5/24/2013 -5/30/2013 l Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,050.70 371653 513012013 371645 513012013 SHANNON, JIM 130926, PLANTSCAPE INC. 150.00 2,376.75 PLANT MAINTENANCE 315400 316833 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 150.00 2,376.75 371646 513012013 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 160.88 STAFF PORTRAITS 315401 052013 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 00001036 315344 160.88 261.57 PAINT 371647 513012013 315345 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 43.59 79.76 622833 WATER 315402 622833 -04-13 5720.6406 79.76 l 371648 513012013 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 107.16 READER HOUSING 315343 63151 1552.6530 107.16 371649 513012013 132051 RICHARD ALAN: PRODUCTIONS - 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6 /4/13 315539 051513 200.00 371650 513012013 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT- 5760.6136 123.53 101" ""'9350 315322 BUNS, STARBURST 4075.5510 123.53 371651 513012013 118168 SANSIO 733.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 315559 INV -11461 -2013 1470.6160 1470.6530 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 14 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD DATA PROCESSING REPAIR PARTS VANVALKENBURG FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5760.6136 733.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1500.6406 371652 513012013 CONTINGENCIES 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. CONTINGENCIES 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 856.67 FILTERS 00001109 315560 124655 856.67 371653 513012013 103249 SHANNON, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/4/13 315540 051513 150.00 371654 613012013 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 96.82 PAINT 00001036 315344 8955 -7 261.57 PAINT 00001088 315345 9154-6 43.59 PAINT - -- 00001104 315346 9278 -3 1470.6530 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 14 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD DATA PROCESSING REPAIR PARTS VANVALKENBURG FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/24/2013 --5/30/2013 5129/2013 7:41:35 Page - 15 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21.04 PAINT 00001114 315347 3430 -2 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 58.53 PAINT, ROLLERS 00001108 315348 9292-4 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES , 18.14 PAINT 00001112 315349. 3428 -6 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 89.04 PAINT, ROLLERS 00001132 315350 9600 -8 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 588.73 371655 5/30/2013 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 59.48 TIME CLOCK ACTIVITY 315403 67010 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 59.48 371656 5/3012013 101690 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO 428.03 FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIR 315404 68935314 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,737.71 ALARM SYSTEM REPAIR 00002294 315405 68931807 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,165.74 ' 371657 513012013 117819 SOUTH OF THE RIVER COMMUNITY B 50.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/2/13 315537 051513 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50,00 371668 5130/2013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 127.95 315443 1033248 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 315444 1035094 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,330.98 315445 1035097 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 643.50 315446 1035092 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 570.00 315447 1034009 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD ONE VERNON SELLING 1,278.00 315448 1035095 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,675.08 315449 1035096 5842.5513' COST OF GOODS SOLD ONE YORK SELLING 2,275.62 315450 1035100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 160.00- 315451 0002267 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 108.46 315620 1036375 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 192.50 315621 1035627 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,056.08 315644 1035099 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD ONE VERNON SELLING 3,267.61 315645, 1035098 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 209.00 315646 1036374 5862.55.13 COST OF GOODS SOLD ONE VERNON SELLING 15,575.90 371659 513012013 103273 SOUTHSIDE BIG BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/3/13 315538 051513 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 371660 5130/2013 104672 SPRINT 14.00 315323 051813 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 513012013 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 70.82 BRAKER KITS, ACTUATORS 00001239 5/24/2013 -5/30/2013 1646.6530 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account Description 28.60 315323 051813 1552.6188 TELEPHONE 30.20 315323 051813 5720.6188 TELEPHONE 35.02 315323 051813 1190.6188 TELEPHONE 50.60 315323 051813 1490.6188 TELEPHONE 56.00 315323 051813 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 59.60 315323 051813 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 86.20 315323 051813 1553.6188 TELEPHONE 89.20 315323 051813 1495.6188 TELEPHONE 109.49 315323 051813 5422.6188 TELEPHONE 120.40 315323 051813 1240.6188 TELEPHONE 190.98 315323 051813 1322.6188 TELEPHONE 191.20 315323 051813 1301.6188 TELEPHONE 283.19 315323 051813 1260.6188 TELEPHONE 416.60 315323 051813 1640.6188 TELEPHONE- 490.58 490.58 315323 051813 5910.6188 TELEPHONE 583.50 315323 051813 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1.577.88 315323 051813. 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 371661 513012013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 70.82 BRAKER KITS, ACTUATORS 00001239 315351 S2725644.001 1646.6530 70.82 371662 5130/2013 101015 STREICHERS 179.99 UNIFORMS 00003572 315561 11019544 1470.6558 179.99 371663 513012013 - 118750 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INC. 2,519.01 FINAL PAYMENT 315562 053113 04400.1705.30 2,519.01 371664 513012013 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 503.70 PHONE CASES, CHARGERS 315352 34471 1552.6406 503.70 371665 513012013 120297 TADYCH, BRIAN 8.10 JURY DUTY EXPENSE 315523 052013 1301.6010 8.10 371666 613012013 104932 TAYLOR MADE 625.63 GOLF BALLS 315524 19523875 5440.5511 588.43 SHOES 315525 19554554 5440.5511 REPAIR PARTS DEPT UNIFORMS 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 16 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ASSESSING PUBLIC HEALTH 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL- MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT.'GENERAL . CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BROWNDALE DAM REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Council Check Register Page - 17. 5/24/2013 -5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 66.92 SHOES 315526 19559639 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,910.83 SHIRTS 315527 19565771 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,191.81 371667 513012013, 131869 TEKIELA, KATHERINE 101.00 CLASS REFUND 315427 ART CENTER 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 101.00 371688 513012013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 132.00 315528 753024 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 35.00 - 315529 00770934 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 102.00 315622 753847 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 161.25 315623 753846 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,226.13 315624 753848 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,586.38 371669 513012013 132037 TOFLEY, ANDREW 24.00 PROGRAM REFUND 315428 CANCELATION 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 24.00 371670 513012013 128835 TOWN & COUNTRY CLEANING CO. IN 7,059.10 WINDOW CLEANING 315563 W513953 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 7,059.10 - 371671 513012013 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 549.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 315530 102056908 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 549.00 371672 6130/2013 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 254.73 FRAMING STEEL 00001957 315353 572050 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 254.73 371673 513012013 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 2,404.69 SEED MIXTURE 00006204 315417 29676 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,404.69 371674 513012013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 59.06 TISSUE 00007512 315406 274064 -00 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 48.93 LIQUOR BAGS 315531 274063 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 107.99 371676 5/30/2013 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 32.89 32.89 40.01 41.37 371676 CITY OF EDINA 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5/24/2013 -5/3012013 SAFETY JACKETS /RAINCOATS 00002526 PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 315407 9704707935 5952.6188 TELEPHONE 315407 9704707935 1240.6188 TELEPHONE 315407 9704707935 1260.6188 TELEPHONE 315407 9704707935 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 315407 9704707935 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 315407 9704707935 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 371676 513012013 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 294.40 SAFETY JACKETS /RAINCOATS 00002526 315639 322918 1260.6406 294.40 371677 513012013 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 59.99 LIGHTING 00001219 315564 15225396 -00 1470.6406 59.99 371678 5130/2013 132038 WEDUM, CHRIS 48.00 PROGRAM REFUND 315429 CANCELATION 1600.4390.01 48.00 371679 513012013 132049 WETMORE, KRISTINE 50.00 GOLF LESSONS CANCELATION 315532 REFUND 5401.4602 -- 50.00 371680 613012013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,559.10 315490 330475 -00 5842.5513 120.00 315625 330806 -00 5842.5513 663.55 315626 330471 -00 5822.5513 1,451.80 315647 330599 -00 5862.5513 I,I 3,794.45 371681 5/3012013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1.21 315491 456413 5862.5513. 6,662.88 - 315492 456416 5862.5513 .56 315627 456412 5842.5513 4,320.15 315628 456415 5842.5513 - '115.79 315629 456411 5822.5513 11,100.59 371682 513012013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,333.03 315452 1080041473 5642.5513 248.60 315453 1080041472 5842.5515 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND LESSONS 512912013 7:41:35 Page - 18 Business Unit RECYCLING PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GOLF REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST-OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5129/2013 7:41:35 Council Check Register Page - 19 5/24/2013 --5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descriptlon Business Unit 6,838.34 315453 1080041472 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 450.65 315454 1080039919 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.43 315455 1080039920 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,444.04 315456 1080041467 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 149.24- 315457 2080007374 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.31- 315458 2080006183 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 392.82 315493 1080041470 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,682.53 315494 1080041468 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,799.25 315630 1080041471 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19,041.14 371683 513012013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 300.00 315459 1090049113 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 174.60 315460 1090049116 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING. 120.00 315461 1090049115 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 879.85 315462 1090048905 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 503.00 315463 1090049984 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 315464 1090049985 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,780.90 315465 1090049983 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 125.00 315533 1090048908 5421.5514, COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 381.00 315534 1090048907 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 192.00 315535 1090048882 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4,633.35 315648 1090052582 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,990.00 315649 1090049114 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING. 3,089.80 315650 1090052585 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19,191.00 371684 513012013 132035 WORST, MOLLY 24.00 PROGRAM REFUND 315430 CANCELATION 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 24.00 371685 5130/2013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 45.48 51- 5276505 -8 315408 368645355 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,544.58 51- 5605640 -1 315409 369083304 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 2,590.06 371686 513012013 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 82.50 315495 12031 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 535,238.83 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register - 5/24/2013 —5/30/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO.# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Check Total 535,238.83 Total Payments 535,238.83 5/29/2013 7:41:35 Page - 20 Business Unit R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EUWA 5/29/20;_ .:43:05 Council Check Summary Page - 1 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 114,229.87 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 290.65 05100 ART CENTER FUND 120.93 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 7,882.72 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,134.89 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 14.00 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 13,958.53 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,398.36 05800 LIQUOR FUND 184,286.69 05900 UTILITY FUND 167,908.46 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,519.01 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.89 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,017.02 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 11,920.69 09900 PAYROLL FUND 31524.12 Report Totals 535,238.83 5/24/2013 - 5/30/2013 We confirm-to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these °claims comply Imall material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing-policie ,s an procedures det®, 3 C CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/26/13- 04/25/13 Acct Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant . City State Account * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/04/09 $30.00 Job Posting PAYPAL *SPRINGBOARD 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1550.6121 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/04/09 $30.00 Job Posting PAYPAL *SPRINGBOARD 402- 935 -7733 CA 1550.6121 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/04/17 $18.61 Food CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 1550.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/03/26 $928.10 Supplies SCS CASES 9095927406 MN 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/03/27 $240.26 Food DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1470.6106 * *7693 MARTYSCHEERER 2013/03/27 $1,155.19 Supplies PETROGEN INC 719 - 5961175 CO 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/02 $25.38 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED . EDINA MN 1470.6106 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/07 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP� 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/09 $19.97 Shipping THE UPS STORE 1715 EDINA MN 1470.6103 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/09 $46.00 Fuel THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/10 $157.80 Supplies TRUSOUTH OIL, LLC 318 - 7953800 LA 1470.6406 .* *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/15 $2.00 Parking ANW PARKING RAMP MINNEAPOLIS MN 1470.6107 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/15 $2.00 Parking ANW PARKING RAMP MINNEAPOLIS MN 1470.6107 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/16 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PREPAID PYMN 888- 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/16 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PREPAID PYMNS88- 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/16 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PREPAID PYMN 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/16 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PREPAID PYMN 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1495.618.8, * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER .2013/04/16 $23.58 OTHER APL *APPLE ITUNES STORE 866 - 712 -7753 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/16 $23.58 OTHER APL *APPLE ITUNES STORE 866 - 712 -7753 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/04/17 $23.58 OTHER APL *APPLE ITUNES STORE 866 - 712 -7753 CA 1495.6188 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/03/26 $40.65 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/03/29 $60.02 Food PITTSBURGH BLUE EDINA EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/04/04 $60.22 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/04/10 $26.19 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/04/12 $34.37 Food BUNNY'S BAR & GRILL ST LOUIS PARK MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/04/14 $93.79 Cell Phone SPRINT *WIRELESS 800 - 639 -6111 KS 1120.6188 * *0168 SCOTT, NEAL 2013/04/11 $489.32 Lodging GRAND VIEW LODGE & TE NISSWA MN 1120.6104 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/04/15 $33.09 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/04/16 $44.10 Food GOOD EARTH I EDINA MN 1120.6106 GAPurchasing cards\2013 purchasing card electronic files12013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 5/20/2013 G: \Pur ^hasing,cards\2013 purchasing. card electronic files\2013 US13 Purchasing Card Register.xlsx -,/90/2013 CITY OF EDINA - CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/26/13- 04/25/13 Acct Account Nam_ a Date -- Amount Description Merchant City State Account * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/04/18 ($93:32) Lodging GRAND VIEW LODGE & TE NISSWA MN 1120.6104 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/04/22 $70.86 Food BIAGGIS EP EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1120.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/03/26 $208.76 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/03/28 $225.00 Conference GTS EDUCATIONAL EVE 651- 222 -7409 MN 1120.6104 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/04/02 $152.33 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/04/01 $591.79 Catering BYERLY'S ST LOUIS PARK MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/04/16 $171.28 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/04/17 $225.00 Training GTS EDUCATIONAL EVE 651- 222 -7409 MN 1120.6104 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/04/20 $489.32 Lodging -Kurt GRAND VIEW LODGE & TE NISSWA MN 1120.6104 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/04/20. $489.32 Lodgin_ g- Klugmar GRAND VIEW LODGE & TE NISSWA MN 1120.6104 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/04/23 $178.95 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1504.6218 * *9159 CARY TEAGUE 2013/03/27 $34.51 Food PERKINS REST 00010058 EDINA MN 1140.6106 * *9159 CARY TEAGUE 2013/04/21 $20.99 Personal - repaid CVS PHARMACY #5308 LAKEVILLE MN 1140.6406 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/03/28 $219:00 Dues AMERICAN PAYROLL ASS( 210 - 2264600 TX 1160.6105 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/04/05 $369.00 Conference-Rogf MNSOCIETYOFCPAS 952 -831 -2707 IVIN 1160.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/04/05 $369.00 Conference -Saw, MNSOCIETYOFCPAS 952- 831 -2707 MN 1160.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/04/11 $19.95 Transaction Fee PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888- 883 =9770 CA 1550.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/04/11 $18.25 Transaction Fee PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -9770 CA 1550.6155 * *0143 DEB MANGEN, 2013/03/25 $575.00 .Conference PAYPAL *INTERNATION 402 -93.5 -7733 CA 1180.6104 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/03/28 $47.55 ' Office Supplies OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN 1120.6406 * *0143 DEB MANGEN. 2013/04/03 $100.00 Conference INTERNATIONAL INSTITU1909- 9444162 CA 1180.6104 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/04/09 $48.00 Training SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 612 - 7207667 MN 1100.6104 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/04/13 $89.95- Office Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTAMZN.COM /BI WA 1180.6406 * *0143 DEB MANGEN. 2013/04/13 $9.55 Office Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMIAMZN.COM /BI WA 1180.6104 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/04/17 $5.35 App APL *APPLE ITUNES STORE 866 -712 -7753 CA 1180.6406 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2013/04/22 $13.89 Coffee STARBUCKS #02592 EDINA EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/03/25 $500.00 Conference INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIA 816 - 7018100 MO 1190!6104 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/03/29 $4.45 Office Supplies THE UPS STORE 1715 EDINA MN 1190.6406 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/01 $90.04 Food PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS =P MN 1190.6106 G: \Pur ^hasing,cards\2013 purchasing. card electronic files\2013 US13 Purchasing Card Register.xlsx -,/90/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/26/13- 04/25/13 Acct Account Name Date * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/01 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/02 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/02 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/12 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/13 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/13 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/17 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/17 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/19 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/04/23 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/03/26 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/04/09 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/04/12 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/04/19 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE, 2013/04/19 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE. 2013/04/19 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/04/19 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/04/19 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2013/03/26 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2013/04/01 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2013/04/02 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2013/04/04 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2013/04/04 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON, 2013/04/09 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2013/03/26 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2013/03/26 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2013/03/26 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2013/04/01 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2013/04/15 Amount Description Merchant City State $7.58 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN $190.00 Conference- Wils•APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888 - 7564624 IL $190.00 Conference -Stoe APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888 - 7564624 IL $160.00 Seminar -Stulc MINNESOTA ASSOC OF A! 763- 569 -3357 MN $160.00 Seminar- Lederm MINNESOTA ASSOC OF A! 763- 569 -3357 MN $160.00 Seminar - Wilson MINNESOTA ASSOC OF A!763-569-3357 MN $5.35 Food PARK CAFE MINNEAPOLIS MN $10.50 Parking GOVT MPLSPARKING MINNEAPOLIS MN $6.00 Parking MN ST IAP ADM PMD PAF SAINT PAUL MN $5.35 Office Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN $463.99 Travel FRONTIER Al 4222174806 FAREFAMILIES OK $225.00 Conference U OF M CCE NONCREDIT 612- 625 -4259 IVIN $85.80 Postage USPS 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS MN $17.82 Postage USPS 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS MN $22.77 Postage USPS 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $23.43 Postage USPS 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS MN $265.00 Utility Permits HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC W, 612- 5960236 MN $265.00 Utility Permits HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC W, 612 - 5960236 MN $99.00 Conference SKILLPATH SEMINARS MA913- 3623900 KS $933.55 Supplies DRYWALL SUPPLY PLYMO PLYMOUTH MN $136.19 Supplies MICRO CENTER- #045 RET,ST LOUIS PARK MN $187.09 Supplies DRYWALL SUPPLY PLYMO PLYMOUTH MN $17.45 Supplies HOME PRO VACUUM CEN 801- 5530788 UT $225.00 Conference U OF M CCE NONCREDIT 612 - 625 -4259 MN $225.21 Ice SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN $19.30 Propane SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA::: MN $26.81 Propane SUPERAMERICA4047 EDINA MN $320.00 Training RUFFRIDGE -JOHNSON E(612.-3789558 MN $51.46 Accessories SPRINT STORE #1558 EDINA MN Account 1190.6106 1190.6104 1190.6104 1190.6104 1190.6104 1190.6104 1190.6106 1190.6106 1190.6107 119.0.6406 1260.6106, 1260.6104, 01398 - 1705.31 01395.1705.31 013 94.1705.31 01393.1705.31 01404.1705.20 05543.1705.20 1281.6104 1500.6406 1552.6406 1500.6406 1552.6511 1281.6104 1552.6406 1301.6406 1301.6406 1281.6104 1301.6406 G: \Purchasing cards\2013 purchasing card electronic files\2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 5/20/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/26/13= 04/25/13 .Acct Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant_ City State Account * *6973 GREG BRETSON 2013/04/11 $149.00 Training FREDPRYOR CAREER TRAC 800- 5563012 KS 1-281.6104 * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER 2013/03/27 $15.21 Supplies ROCKLER WOOD* MINNETONKA MN 1301.6556 * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER 2013/03/28 $107.26 OTHER BEST BUY MHT 0000281E RICHFIELD, - -MN 1301.6556 * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER , 2013/04'/16 $120.71 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1301.6556 - * *6981 JOHN SCHEERER 2013/04/19 $45.06 Supplies WHITEHALL PRODUCTS WHITEHALL MI 1318.64.06 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON ' 2013/04/05 $400.00 Conference MN ELECTRICAL ASSOC 612- 827 -6,117 MN 1240.6105 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2013/04/23 $6.83 Food Arbys MONTICELLO MN 1281.6104 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN 2013/03/26 $425.00 Conference AZTECA SYSTEMS INC 801- 5232751 UT 5919.6104 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN 2013/03/26 $463.99 Travel FRONTIER.AI 42221- 74806.FAREFAMILIES OK 5919.6406 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN 2013/04/01 $7.49 Supplies ;NORTHERNrTOOL EQU, IPh BURNSVILLE, -MN 5913.6406 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN . 2013/04/11 $215.00 Permit HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC W, 612 - 5960236 ,IVIN. .5913.6260 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN 2013/04/17 $242.10 Supplies HOMEDEPOT.COM 800- 430 -3376 :CA 1399.6406 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2013/03/25 $21000 Business Expensf PAYPAL *MINNESOTASE 402 - 935 -7733 CA' 5919.6104 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2013/04/09 $75.29 Hydrant Adapter USA BLUE BOOK 800 =493 -9876 IL -. 5913.6406 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2013/04/10 $159.04 Supplies WW GRAINGER 877- 2022594 ..PA 5921.6556 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/03/24 .$89:50 Lodging SHOOTING STAR HOTEL MAHNOMEN MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/03/27 $10.73 Food CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/03/27 $20.72 Food CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/03/29 $182.37 -Food QDOBA MEXICAN GRILL= 2_EDINA MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/03/02 ($552:46) Gun Safe WWW.THESPORTSAUTHC 888 -801 -9164 PA 1400.6406 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/02 $214.55 Food QDOBA MEXICAN GRILL -2 EDINA MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/03 $160.91 Food QDOBA MEXICAN GRILL -2 EDINA.;. MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/03 $30.29 Food AVIANDS AT METROP.OIN'SAINT`LOUIS P MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/,04/04 $160.91 Food QDOBA MEXICAN GRILL -2 EDINA MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/11 $275.00 Conference THE EVENT GROUP - HTTP: / /WWW. MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/11 $60.00 General Supplies FREDS SHOE REPAIR HOPKINS � MN - 1400.6406 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/16 $39.32 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF - -ED EDINA MN. 1400:6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/16 $45.00 Conference PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402- 935 -7733 CA 1490.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/16 $45.00 Conference _- PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402- 935 -7733 CA 1490.6104 G:1Pu� '-gsing cards12013 purchasing card electronic files\2013 USP ^- .,irchasing Card, Register.xlsx '-"'0/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/26/13- 04/25/13 Acct Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant City State Account * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/16 $276.80 Lodging RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LOD DEERWOOD MN 1490.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/17 $695.00 Training COOPER INSTITUTE 972 - 3413200 TX 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/18 $144.28 Lodging RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LOD DEERWOOD MN 1490.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/22 $32.14 Food FAMOUS DAVES BBQ DULUTH MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/23 $20.03 Accessories 3GSTORE.COM /MDG 847 - 462 -4004 IL 1400.6160 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/23 $24.97 Food PIZZA LUCE DULUTH III DULUTH MN 1400.6104 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/04/23 $10.95 Food GRANDMAS SALOON 7 Gf DULUTH MN 1400.6104 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2013/04/10 $29.95 Software AVANQUEST NORTH AME 800- 3956682 CA 5820.6513 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2013/04/11 $167.08 Cables MONOPRICE INC 909 - 989 -6887 CA 1554.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2013/04/12 $36.90 Cables MONOPRICE INC 909- 989 - 6887 CA 1554.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2013/04/18 $61.10 iPad Accessories AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BI WA 1554.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2013/04/18 $18.99 iPad Accessories AMAZON MKTPLACE PMIAMZN.COM /BI WA 1100.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2013/04/22 $563.57 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2821 ELK RIVER MN 1554.6406 * *5546 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2013/03/26 $140.40 League BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN I EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629.6406 * *5546 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2013/04/06 $38.48 Supplies TRISTRO.COM /CC 800 -454 -3599 OH 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/04/09 $156.00 Office Supplies PARADISE CHARTER CRUZ' 952 - 474 -8949 MN 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/04/14 $118.84 Recreation PINSTRIPES 847 - 4802323 MN 1629.6406 * *5629 DONNA TILSNER 2013/03/27 $35.00 Gift Card BUNNY'S BAR & GRILL ST LOUIS PARK MN 4077.6406 * *5629 DONNA TILSNER 2013/03/21 $183.42 General Supplies SEARS.COM 9300 800- 349 -4358 IA 1624.6406 * *5629 DONNA TILSNER 2013/04/02 $764.99 General Supplies FOODSERVICEWAREHOU! 877 - 877 -4379 CO 4075.6406 * *5629 DONNA TILSNER 2013/03/12 ($141.95) DISPUTED TRAWTHE INVITATION SHOP 111 - 111 -1111 CA 1622.6406 * *5629 DONNA TILSNER 2013/02/28 ($26.66) DISPUTED TRAN! PAPERMART 323 - 7268200 CA 1622.6406 * *56.29 DONNA TILSNER 2013/03/05 ($146.11) DISPUTED IRAN! US IMPRINTS LLC 866 - 604 -6774 TN 1622.6406 * *5629 DONNA TILSNER 2013/04/22 $26.66 WHOLESALE TRA PAPERMART RE -BILL 323 - 7268200 CA 1622.6406 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/04/10 $27.26 Supplies PARTY CITY #764 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1500.6103 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/04/17 $146.11 WHOLESALE TRA US IMPRINTS LLC 866 - 604 -6774 TN 1622.6406 * *4509 DONNATILSNER 2013/04/21 $62.00 Ballhopper AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BI WA 1623.6406 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/04/21 $62.00 Ballhopper AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /Bl WA 1623.6406 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/04/22 $24.99 Food BYERLY'S ST LOUIS P ST LOUIS PAR MN 1500.6103 G: \Purchasing cards\2013 purchasing card electronic files\2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 5/20/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER. 03/26/13- 04/25/13 Acct . Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant City, . State Account * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/04/22 $62.00 Ballhopper AMAZON.COM AM2N.COM /BI WA 1623.6406: * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/04/24 $88.07 Supplies DISPLAYS2GO.COM 401- 2470333 RI 1628.6406 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2013/03/26 $42.90 Supplies EDINA ART CENTER 612 - 9156600 MN 1600.6406 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2013/04/22 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP� 888- 294 -6804 CA 1600.6103 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/03/28 $137.10 Pressure washer NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPh BURNSVILLE MN 5913.6406 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/03/29 $35.34 Parts . NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPh BURNSVILLE MN 5913.6406 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/04/02 $299.00 Training SKILLPATH SEMINARS MA 913 - 3623900 KS 1640.6104 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2013/04/02 $299.00 Training SKILLPATH SEMINARS MA 913- 3623900 "KS 1640.6104 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013/03/25 $128;72 TV TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /03/26 $20.00 Data Plan -Benue VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP/ 888 -294 -6804 CA - 1130.6160 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /03/27 $128.99 Wad Accessories AMAZON MKTPLACE PM1 AMZN.COM /BI WA 1100.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013/03/27 $242.22 Wad Accessories AMAZON MKTPLACE PMIAMZN:COM /BI WA 1470.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /03/27 $102.16- Wad Accessories AMAZON MKTPLACE PMIAMZN.COM /BI WA 1495.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /03/27 $97.88 Wad Accessories AMAZON MKTPLACE PMIAMZN.COM /BI WA 1600.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /03/27 $247.47 Hard drives AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTAMZN.COM /BI WA 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /03/28 $5.00 Software AKSMT.COM 877- 273 -3049 CA 1130.6124 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /03/31 $281.48 Hard drives AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BI WA 1554.6710 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/02 $899.99 TV AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BI WA 2401.4760 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/04 $101.90 Laptop battery AMAZON MKTPLACE PMIAMZN.COM /BI WA 1470.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/04 $128.50 Wad Accessories AMAZON MKTPLACE PMIAMZN.COM /BI WA 5913.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/04 $9.10 Office Supplies OFFICE MAX ST. LOUIS PAR. MN 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/06 $32.17 Software ADOBE SYSTEMS,-,INC. 800- 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/06 $32.17 Software ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800- 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/07 $52.56 OFFICE SERVICES CITRIXONLINE.COM 855 - 837 -1750 CA 1495.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/08 $17.97 OFFICE SERVICES CINEQUIPT MINNEAPOLIS MN 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013/04/13 $20.00 Data plan - Denfel VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPI 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/15 $50.00 Membership AMERICAN INST OF. GRAP 212- 807 -1990 NY 1130.6105 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/16 $129.00 Conference EB *SEE CHANGE 2013 CC EVENTBRITE.C(CA 1130.6104 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/16 $107.76 Camera Accessoi CINEQUIPT MINNEAPOLIS MN- 1130.6407 G: \Pur^'gsing cards\2013 purchasing card electronic files\2013 USIB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx F ")0/2013 G: \Purchasing cards\2013 purchasing card electronic files\2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 5/20/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/26/13- 04/25/13 Acct Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant City State Account * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/17 $20.00 Data Plan -Martir VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOP/ 888- 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/17 $750.00 Office Services GOOGLE *SITE SEARCH GOOGLE.COM /CA 1130.6124 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013 /04/22 $20.00 Data Plan -Benne VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPE 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNER012013/04/24 $125.00 Registration EB 60TH ANNIVERSARY C EVENTBRITE.C(CA 1130.6106 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2013/04/01 $60.00 Training PAYPAL *MIAMA 402 - 935 -7733 CA 5510.6104 * *7820 SUSIE MILLER 2013/04/11 $311.80 Airfare DELTA AIR 00623281849 DELTA.COM CA 5510.6104 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2013/04/04 $53.00 Pressure Tank FILTER DIRECT CO 714 - 953 -9009 CA 5111.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2013/04/08 $100.00 Advertising PAYPAL *DANNYSAATHO 402- 935 -7733 CA 5110.6122 . * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/04/01 $18.15 Office Services MR LOCK 817 - 2678022 TX 5420.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/04/05 $12.00 Supplies PAYPAL *APRES INC EDINA MN 5420.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/04/16 $110.00 Membership US GOLF ASSOCIATION 908 -234 -2300 NJ 5410.6105 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/04/17 $225.00 Membership NATIONAL GOLF 561 - 7446006 FL 5410.6105 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/04/19 $45.25 Office Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PM1 AMZN.COM /BI WA 5410.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/04/23 $90.00 Training MINNESOTA-LICENSED BE 651 - 772 -0910 MN 5410.6105 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/04/23 $126.71 Flags VICTORY CORPS 7637461371 MN 5410.6406 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/04/03 $35.61 Postage PB METER REN *TAL 800- 228 -1071 CT 5710.6235 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/04/04 $100.00 Postage PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 - 468 -8454 CT 5710.6235 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/04/12 $530.00 Training MN RECREATION AND PA 763 -571 -1305 MN 5710.6104 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/04/17 $107.26 Wad Accessories BEST BUY MHT 0000281E RICHFIELD MN 1600.6513 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/03/26 $70.65 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 . * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/03/26 $222.98 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/03/28 $44.83 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/04/01 $56.39 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/04/01 $73.75 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/04/02 $38.60 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/04/05 $21.41 Supplies NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPh BURNSVILLE MN'. 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/04/09 $17.00 Seminar PAYPAL *WOMENINLEIS 402- 935 -7733 CA 5760.6104 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/04/10 $17.66 Supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/04/16 $21.72 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD' MN 5761.6406 G: \Purchasing cards\2013 purchasing card electronic files\2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 5/20/2013 G : \Pur-',3sing cards\2013 purchasing card.electronic'files\2013 USES +rchasing Card Register.xlsx )/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/26/13- 04/25/13 Acct Account Name Date Amount Description - Merchant City State Account * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/04/24 $197.41 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD- MN 5761.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/03/29 $16.05 Office Supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5820.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM ;2013/03/29 $16.05 Office Supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5840.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/03/29 $16.05 Office Supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN. 5860.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/04/03 $71.80 Office Supplies STAPLS70983380330000C 877 - 8267755 MI 5840.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/04/11 $15.54 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT'BEST HAR EDINA MN 5842.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/04/17 $38.93 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5841.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/04/18 $6.40 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST.HAR EDINA MN -5841.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/03/26 $24.99 Office Supplies ENVIROINKSCOM 512- 731 -6277 TX 7410.6513 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/04/01 $36.87 Office Services_ EMA *EMMA EMAIL MARI800- 5954401 TN 7410.6122 - * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/04/01 $111.90 Supplies PATRIOT SURPLUS 717- 323 -1104 PA 7414.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/04/02 $2.00 Magazine SubscrTWX *READERSD 800- 882 -6317 NY 7410.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/04/02 $44.08„ Food PAPA JOHN'S #1537 1502- 261 -7272 MN 7410.6106 * *7021 DEB FIELDS l 2013/04/05 $152.90. Signs SMARTSIGN 7187971900 NY 7411.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/04/10 $66.63 Office Services GOOGLE *ADWS5107668 GOOGLE *AD1A CA 7410.6122 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/04/12 $2.00 Magazine SubscrTWX *ROLLNGST 800- 882 -6317 NY 7410.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/04/22 $2.00 Magazine SubscrTWX *TIMEMAG 800 -882 -6317 NY 7410.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/04/23 $59.70 Food BACKSTREET KITCHEN 952 - 9438008 MN 7410.6106 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/03/26 $97.53 Supplies MENARDS 3268 _EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7412.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/03/30 $64.32 Ammo GANDER MOUNTAIN ' EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7414.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/04 $104.06 Ladder THE HOME DEPOT -2812 - EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/04 $32.68 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/04 $11.77 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 .EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/12 $38.51 Ammo GUN STOP OF M I N N ETO N 000-0000000 MN 7414.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/17 $110.04 Supplies SEARS ROEBUCK 1142 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/22 ($21.44) Supplies TARGET 00023002 RICHFIELD MN 7414.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/22 $66.42 Supplies TARGET 00023002 RICHFIELD MN 7414.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/23 $32.13 Supplies TARGET 00002204 EDEN-PRAIRIE MN - 7414.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/22 $126.42 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 G : \Pur-',3sing cards\2013 purchasing card.electronic'files\2013 USES +rchasing Card Register.xlsx )/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/26/13- 04/25/13 Acct Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant City State Account * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/04/23 $20.14 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT #415 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 $29,240.33 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll 'es nd procedures da �� l 3 G: \Purchasing cards\2013 purchasing card electronic files\2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 5/20/2013 it To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks and Recreation Director Date: June 4, 2013 Subject: Shared Parking Agreement With YMCA for Yorktown Park 0 e ^CORPOR15 1888 Agenda Item #: IV.C. Action Requested: Approve the Shared Parking Agreement with the YMCA for Yorktown Park Information / Background: Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ At the April 2 City Council meeting the City Council approved the Yorktown Park "pilot" community garden project, including a new shared use parking lot with the YMCA. The YMCA will pay for the construction and maintenance of the parking lot on Yorktown Park property. There is a net gain of 28 stalls, with the elimination of a row of parking on the existing parking lot and Yorktown Park border. Staff will monitor parking lot usage and survey gardeners to determine if any signage is required for community garden parking. The city will obtain quotes for construction of the shared parking area. The city will select a quote and the YMCA must agree and accept the quote. The YMCA will pay the city the amount of the selected quote and the city will hire the contractor to construct the parking area and oversee the construction process. The term of this agreement is 20 years and will automatically extend for 5 year terms unless either party gives a 60 day notice prior to the last day of the term. The required maintenance for the shared parking area is described in detail in Exhibit B. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT THIS SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT (this "Agreement ") is made effective as of May 29, 2013, by and between Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Twin Cities, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation d /b /a YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities, 2125 East Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 (the "YMCA "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (the "City "). Recitals A. The City is the fee owner of real property legally described as Outlot C, Yorktown, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City Property "), which the City uses and operates as Yorktown Park. B. The YMCA is the fee owner of real property legally described as Lot 1, Block 4, Yorktown, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "YMCA Property "), which the YMCA uses to operate its Southdale YMCA. C. The YMCA Property is south of and adjacent to the City Property, and the portion of the YMCA Property abutting the City Property is used by the YMCA and its members, employees and other users for parking. D. The City intends to use part of the easterly portion of the City Property for a new community garden (the "Community Garden "). E. The City Property lacks off - street parking and the City needs off - street parking for the Community Garden. F. The YMCA would benefit from additional off - street parking for the YMCA Property. G. The City and the YMCA wish to arrange for the construction, maintenance and use of an 2316826v2 off - street parking area (the "Shared Parking Area ") located primarily on the City Property 1 Is but partly on the YMCA Property, as depicted on Exhibit "A" hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of License by the YMCA. In consideration of the City's covenants and agreements in this Agreement, the.YMCA hereby grants to the City, for the benefit of the users of the Community Garden, a license to use the curb cuts and driveways on and serving the YMCA Property, as they shall be located and relocated by the YMCA from time to time, for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress between York Avenue South and the Shared Parking Area. 2. Grant of License by the City. In consideration of the YMCA's covenants and agreements in this Agreement, the City hereby grants to the YMCA, for the benefit of the members, employees and other users of the YMCA Property, a license to use the Shared Parking Area for vehicular parking while using the YMCA Property. 3. Construction of Shared Parking Area. The City will promptly obtain quotes to construct the Shared Parking Area and, if the quote selected by the City is accepted by the YMCA, the YMCA will pay to the City the amount of the selected and accepted quote and the City will cause the Shared Parking Area promptly to be constructed in accordance with that quote. If the YMCA fails to approve the selected quote or to pay to the City the amount of the selected quote on or before June 30, 2013, this Agreement shall never become effective and shall have no force or effect. 4. Maintenance of Shared Parking Area. Throughout the term of the licenses hereby granted, the YMCA shall be responsible for maintenance of the Shared Parking Area in accordance with Exhibit "B." 5. Term of Licenses. The term of the licenses granted pursuant to this Agreement is twenty 2316826v2 2 (20) years, commencing on the date of completion of construction of the Shared Parking Area, as certified in a written notice from the 6ty to the YMCA; provided, however, that the term of the licenses granted pursuant to this Agreement automatically shall be extended for successive extension terms of five (5) years each unless the City or the YMCA elects, by written notice to the other given not later than sixty (60) days prior to the last day of the term (whether the initial or any extension term) that such party elects that the licenses shall expire at the end of the current term (whether the initial term or any extension term). Upon the expiration or sooner termination (by mutual written consent) of the licenses granted pursuant to this Agreement, the City and the YMCA each may, at its own expense, restore the City Property and the YMCA Property, respectively, to eliminate the Shared Parking Area. 6. Additional Miscellaneous Provisions. A. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect to any matter mentioned herein, and no prior or contemporaneous agreement or understanding pertaining to any such matter shall be effective. B. This Agreement may be modified only by a writing signed by the parties in interest at the time of the modification. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the address listed in the opening paragraph. Either party may, by written notice to the other, specify a different address for notice purposes. Notices shall be deemed given when actually 2316826v2 3 received or when delivery thereof is refused. C. The rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, their respective successors and assigns. D. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. E. The invalidity of any provision of this Agreement as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction shall in no way affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party to this Agreement has caused it to be executed on the date indicated below. Dated: , 2013. CITY OF EDINA LO-A James Hovland, Mayor By: Scott Neal, City Manager Dated: , 2013. YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES, DB /A YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES By: Its By: Its 2316826v2 4 Exhibit A k.,ro.TT i 4. m, , J-j D m tt _ 1 0 m o n IF o z zC4 A. 1 ® 1 4. XEF�XES AVE JWIP �n {ii o 1 HEREBY CERTIFY iNAT iwS ° v PIAH WAS PREPARED 8Y SI CR yORKTOWN PARK OF EDINA ^7 a UN[IER WY OMECt SIIPERN90N COMMUNITY GARDEN ~ x 0 THAT I Au A CULv c o ENf EERCO PROCESS�OUAL COMMUNITY GARDEN @CITY EO,NAUYNROS5a39 VAx,7 CHGNEER DPR( THE LAWS Cd THE STATE a uluxcsorA Ph: 957- 826 -0371 & PARKING LOT PARKING LOT Far 952 -826 -0392 NQCIATEIBYI REIIARNS rwR xn y]9Zp_ REMS10R5 li 2316826v2 EXHIBIT "A" Depiction of Shared Parking Area EXHIBIT "B" Shared Parking Area Maintenance Requirements Plowing: After two (2) inches of snow has accumulated. Striping: Striped in conjunction with adjoining YMCA parking lot. Sweeping: Swept in conjunction with adjoining YMCA parking lot. Patching: Potholes will be repaired each Spring Cracksealing: Cracksealed in conjunction with adjoining YMCA parking lot. Sealcoating: Sealcoated within four (4) years after construction. Catch Basins: Catch basins shall be kept clear of debris at all times. Miscellaneous: The YMCA shall be responsible for all other maintenance of the Shared Parking Area required by City ordinances. 2316826v2 0 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ,w91A= O/ neF - \:� 0_RPORp� O lace. Agenda Item #: IV. D. From: Laura Adler, Water Resources Coordinator Action M Discussion ❑ Date: June 4, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Engineering Services — Evaluation of FEMA Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for Engineering Services. Information / Background: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has been revising the flood plain maps throughout Hennepin County since 2004. They issued a set of Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and the accompanying Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Hennepin County and started a 90 day review period on April 5, 2013. The proposed flood plain map was developed by FEMA and its contractors using hydrologic models and more accurate elevation information than was available when the maps were last revised in 2004. Staff has reviewed the preliminary flood plain maps, provided notices to over 800 properties, and fielded calls from residents representing around 150 properties affected by the changes. There are three areas that may justify an appeal during the FEMA 90 day review. Two flood zones include major changes in the flood elevation: the Rolling Green Neighborhood and Nine Mile Village, another in the Morningside Neighborhood does,not have an elevation assigned to it. This request for purchase will provide technical review of the three areas to determine if an appeal is warranted, and if warranted, substantiation to support an appeal. Staff will work with technical experts at BARR Engineering Company (BARR) to determine if an appeal is warranted at each location. The cost for this request for purchase is a high side estimate assuming each site is determined to warrant an appeal, discussed below in greater detail in the detailed staff review. Detailed Staff Review Residents in the Rolling Green Neighborhood, Morningside Neighborhood and in Nine Mile Village have expressed concern about being newly included in the flood plain and have asked staff to look into these areas further to determine if an appeal to FEMA is warranted. The inclusion. in the flood plain can have effects on flood insurance requirements, property values, and the feasibility to add -on or rebuild a home. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 r. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Staff asked BARR to put together a. scope of services to review the flood plain in these three areas. The scope of services consisted of two parts: (1) a review of the existing information to determine if further investigation is warranted, and (2) a more thorough investigation of areas where it is warranted, along with possible preparation of appeal(s) to FEMA. BARR has a significant amount of background information, having worked on the city's Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP), which included modeling of the storm sewer system throughout the city. They were also a part of a storm sewer project in the Rolling Green Neighborhood, worked on a previous change to the flood maps for Methodist Hospital, and serve as the Engineering Advisor for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, who provided modeling of Nine Mile Creek to FEMA. / The goal of this evaluation is to ensure that FEMA's FIRMs are as accurate as possible. This may mean that some of these evaluations do not result in an appeal. In any case, we will have greater confidence in the accuracy of the flood risk assessment. Morningside Area This area has been identified by FEMA as a Zone A (or an approximate 100 -year flood inundation area) with no base flood elevation determined (see Attachment 1). The extent of the 100 -year flood plain area shown on the preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) extends beyond the flood inundation area predicted in Edina's CWRMP, which is based on a 100 -year flood elevation of 869 MSL. If the base flood elevation were determined to.be 869 MSL, approximately 16 properties would be removed from the flood plain. Part I of the evaluation of the Morningside Area includes investigating the origin of the flood inundation area on the FIRM and comparing it to the flood elevation in the CWRMP. The cost range for Part I is $1,000- $2,000. Part 2 of the evaluation of the Morningside Area includes further investigation if necessary, and if it is determined that an appeal should be made to FEMA, the documentation regarding the modeling and /or mapping and preparation of submittal materials for the appeal. The cost range for Part 2 is $1,00045,000. Nine Mile Village The 100 -year flood plain shown on the preliminary FIRM in the Bredesen Park areas has expanded to include Nine Mile Village, which is located southeast of Bredesen Park and northwest of the intersection of Trunk Highway, (TH) 62 and Tracy Avenue (see Attachment 2). This represents the potential for backwater from the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek overtop a high point in the ditch on the north side of TH 62 and flow eastward into the Nine Mile Village development. There are approximately 24 townhomes that are now included in the flood plain that were not previously. A portion of the site of The Waters development is also included within the new flood plain. However, the preliminary FIRM shows an aerial photo and elevations from before construction this site started, and may not accurately reflect the current elevations on the site. There are a number of technical issues involved in this investigation. There are two different storm water:' models for the area: the model from the city's CWRMP, which describes all of the land that does not drain directly to Nine Mile Creek (the "City" model), and the model of Nine Mile Creek, which describes flows within the creek and the lands that drain directly to it (the "Creek" model). These two models are used in conjunction to predictthe real -world behavior of the storm water system. One aspect of the two separate models is that the Creek model does not include the storage provided in the pond areas east of Nine Mile Village. The Creek model shows that the elevation of the creek rises to REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 857 MSL, which is an increase of 4 feet over the 2004 base flood elevation in the area. FEMA took that elevation and traced it along the ground elevations. In this case, that traced elevation appears to overtop the high point of the ditch adjacent to TH 62, which would allow the floodwaters to spill into Nine Mile Village and the ponds to the east. However, since the amount of storage that would be provided after that spillover isn't included, the model may not accurately predict the flood elevation in that area. The first step to this investigation will be to get a more accurate elevation survey of the area to determine if the high point in the TH 62 ditch is above or below 857 MSL. City staff will complete this survey. Part I of the evaluation of the Nine Mile Village area will include a review the elevation survey and a review of Nine Mile Creek and City storm water models. The cost range for Part I is $1,000- $1,500. Part 2 of the, evaluation will include further investigation is necessary, and if it is determined that an appeal should be made to FEMA, the documentation regarding the modeling and /or mapping and preparation of submittal materials for the appeal. The cost range for Part 2 is $2,000 45,000. Rolling Green Area There is some history to the flood plain in the Rolling Green area (see Attachment 3). In 2004, FIRMS were issued with the base flood elevation of 892 MSL. This elevation was the same as the elevation from 1980, and the reason for the reissuance was to provide flood plain information in a digital format. In 2005, FEMA began the process of revising the FIRMs in Hennepin County. Also in 2005, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) developed a hydrologic and hydraulic model (H &H model) of the watershed of Minnehaha Creek. The H &H model predicted a lower flood elevation in the Rolling Green area (approximately 888.5 MSL). The results from this model were included in the preliminary flood plain maps issued by FEMA as part of the county -wide map updates. In 2006, several municipalities expressed concerns about the significant reductions in flood elevation, and the MN DNR and FEMA agreed to work on resolving these concerns with the H &H model used. In 2007, Methodist Hospital in St. Louis Park conducted a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) which was necessary to accommodate the expansion of their facility adjacent to Minnehaha Creek. The modeling analysis for the LOMR used the MCWD H &H model as the base model, with some modifications conducted to more accurately model flows in the creek and meet MN DNR requirements. The outcome of the LOMR was a flood elevation of 889.5 in the Meadowbrook Golf Course and Rolling Green neighborhood. This was lower than the flood elevation from the 2004 maps, but higher than the elevation originally predicted by the MCWD H &H model. Since the 2007 LOMR, the MN DNR and FEMA have worked to improve the H &H model of Minnehaha Creek. The 100 -year flood elevation included in the 2013 preliminary FIRM for this area is 891 MSL. The Rolling Green Neighborhood has had a number of teardown and rebuilds in the past few years. This has been possible because the official flood elevation has been set at 8891 MSL. Residents who see that the flood plain may increase to 891 MSL are concerned that their opportunity for sale or rebuild on their property will be significantly limited, affecting their property values. They are also questioning the change from the 2007 LOMR. Part I of the evaluation of the Rolling Green area includes contacting the MN DNR and FEMA regarding the reason for the increase in flood elevation from the 2007 LOMR, reviewing the elevation data used to map the preliminary FIRM and comparison with the more current elevation data, and reviewing some specific projects that have occurred in ther area that may affect flood levels. The cost range for Part I is $3,000- REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 4 $7,000. Part 2 of the evaluation includes, if warranted, further investigation into the model in the immediate area. It may include the preparation of documentation regarding the modeling and /or mapping for the submittal of an appeal. The cost range for Part 2 is $4,000 - $10,000. _ Attachments: Maps: I. Morningside Area 2. Nine Mile Village 3. Rolling Green Area BARR Engineering Co: Proposal I GAMUNFRAS \UTILITIES DIVISTORM SEWERIFIood PlainU0130604 CounciNtem M D. Engineering Services - Evaluation of FEMA Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations.docx Attachment 1 Morningside Area 0 0 0 U N a U 2 6 d Parcels Edina Parcels A, Surrounding Parcels O4 p �,l ,_,. City Owned Property �, le O Proposed Flood Plain q �y Proposed 100 -year flood plain •.�. Ko• Ik$h Proposed 500 -year flood plain Attachment 2 Nine Mile Village Proposed Flood Plain S�1NA Proposed 100 -year flood plain �j/' —��1� Proposed 500 -year flood plain ®l e Parcels Existing 100 -year flood plain Parcels •, . ��• City Owned Property `s G Attachment 3 Rolling Green Area Parcels = Edina Parcels F—ISurrounding Parcels = Existing 100 -year flood plain (from 2007 LOMR) Proposed Flood Plain Proposed 100 -year flood plain Proposed 500 -year flood plain • `1�'��rt, Est fit'`', • ��gs resourceful. naturally, g' engineering and environmental consultants E3ARR May 29, 2013 i Ms. Laura Adler City of Edina Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Scope of Services for Evaluation of FEMA Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations Dear Ms. Adler The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recently released proposed flood hazard determinations for the city of Edina for public review and comment. Per your request we have developed a scope of services to evaluate three proposed FEMA floodplain areas identified by City of Edina (City) staff that either differ from the effective (2004) FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) or may not accurately represent the floodplain based on more recent modeling and/or mapping. The proposed floodplain in each of these areas identified by the City has the potential for substantial effects on Edina residents; therefore, in these areas the City would like to investigate the technical supporting information and if appropriate, submit an appeal to FEMA within the 90 day appeal period that ends July 4, 2013. Detailed below is Barr's proposed scope of services and estimated costs to assist City staff with evaluation of these areas and submittal of an appeal, if necessary. The estimated costs for each task are presented as ranges due to the investigative nature of this scope of services and the difficulty in determining the level of effort for model revisions and appeal submittal preparation without a full understanding the extent of the issues with the modeling and/or mapping. Completion of the work tasks and tracking of associated costs will be completed in close coordination with City staff. Task 1. Morningside Area Background This area has been identified by FEMA as a Zone A (or an approximate 100 -yr flood inundation area) with no base flood elevation determined. The extent of the 100 -year floodplain area shown on the preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) extends beyond the flood inundation area predicted in Edina's Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP), which is based on a100 -year flood elevation of 869 MSL. Barr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77th Street, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Ms. Laura Adler May 29, 2013 Page 2 Subtask 1 A. Preliminary evaluation of proposed FEMA determination To evaluate whether the proposed FEMA floodplain determination should be appealed, Barr will complete the following: C Determine whether or not a specific flood elevation was used to map the flood inundation area; if a specific elevation was used, determine the vertical datum of that elevation C If the elevation used for the mapping is greater than the predicted flood elevation in the City's CWRMP, determine, the reason for the higher elevation by identifying and reviewing the engineering information (which may or may not include modeli ng) used for the FEMA mapping and assessing its appropriateness in comparison with the City's detailed XP -SWMM model O Identify the elevation data source used to map the zone identified on the preliminary FIRM G Review the City's XP -SWMM model for the Morningside area O Discuss with MN DNR and FEMA the likelihood of the flood inundation area being revised through appeal based on updated modeling and/or mapping The results of the preliminary evaluation will be summarized and presented to City staff at a meeting to determine if further evaluation is necessary. Subtask IA. Estimated cost range: $1,000 - $2,000 Subtask 1 B. Additional evaluation and preparation of relevant information for appeal submittal If necessary, the modeling and/or mapping of the 100 -year floodplain in the Morningside area will be further evaluated. If it is determined that the flood zone identified on the preliminary FIRM should be appealed, documentation regarding the modeling and /or mapping will be prepared. Note that the estimated cost below includes preparation of submittal information, but does not include time for, addressing follow -up questions and/or discussion with MN DNR and FEMA, which would be additional cost. Subtask 113. Estimated cost range: $1,000 - $5,000 PAMp1s\23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013\FEMA Evaluations \Scope_Let ter_ FEMA _PrelimFMM_Eva1_5- 29- 2013.docx Ms. Laura Adler May 29, 2013 Page 3 Task 2. Nine Mile Village Background The 100 -year floodplain shown on the preliminary FIRM in the Bredesen Park area has expanded to include Nine Mile Village, which is located southeast of Bredesen Park and northwest of the intersection of Trunk Highway (TH) 62 and Tracy Avenue. The expanded floodplain shown on the preliminary FIRM represents the potential for backwater from the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek to overtop a high point in the ditch on the north side of TH 62 and flow eastward into the Nine Mile Village development. The 100 - year flood elevations identified in the City's CWRMP for w"- aterbodies within the Nine Mile Village development are lower, as they do not reflect this potential for backwater from the creek. Subtask 2A. Preliminary evaluation of proposed FEMA determination To determine whether the proposed FEMA determination should be appealed, Barr will evaluate the following: ® Review of the XP -SWMM model and resulting 100 -year flood elevations of the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek upstream of TH 62 used by FEMA Review of the digital elevation data (and vertical datum) used to model and map the floodplain shown on the preliminary FIRM C Review of field survey results to assess potential for backwater into the Nine Mile Village development (field survey to be conducted by City staff) The results of the preliminary evaluation will be summarized and presented to City staff in a meeting to determine if further evaluation is necessary. Subtask 2A. Estimated cost range: $1,000 - $1,500 Subtask 2B. Additional evaluation and preparation of relevant information for appeal submittal If review of the modeling and available digital elevation data indicates a potential for backwater to flow eastward to the Nine Mile Village development, the model of the Nine Mile Village development will be revised accordingly and 100 -year flood elevations for waterbodies within the Nine Mile Village development will be re- evaluated. If it is determined that the flood zone identified on the preliminary FIRM should be revised, documentation regarding the modeling and/or mapping will be prepared. Note that the estimated cost below includes preparation of submittal information, but does not include time for addressing follow -up questions and/or discussion with MN DNR and FEMA, which would potentially be at additional cost. Subtask 2B. Estimated cost range: $2,000 - $5,000 P:\Mpls\23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles\2013\FEMA Evaluat ions\ Scope_ Letter_ FEMA_PrelinTIRM_Eval_5- 29- 2013.docx Ms. Laura Adler May 29, 2013 Paae 4 Task 3. Rolling Green Area Background The 100 -year floodplain identified on the preliminary FIRM for the Rolling Green neighborhood extends beyondlthe previously established floodplain in several areas. The historic 100 -year flood elevation for this area is 892, as identified in the effective Hennepin County Flood Insurance Study dated' 2004. In 2005, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) developed a hydrologic and hydraulic model of the watershed tributary to Minnehaha Creek, which predicted a lower flood elevation in the Rolli ng Green area (approximately 888.5). The results from this model were included in the preliminary floodplain maps issued by FEMA as part of the county -wide map updates. In 2006, several municipalities expressed concerns about the significant reductions in flood elevations, and the MN DNR and FEMA agreed to work on resolving these. concerns with the hydrologic and hydraulic model used. In 2007, the Park Nicollet Hospital in St. Louis Park conducted a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) which was necessary to accommodate expansion of their facility adjacent to Minnehaha Creek. The modeling analysis for the LOMR used the MCWD hydrologic and hydraulic model as the base model, with some model modifications conducted to more accurately model flows in the creek and meet MN DNR requirements. The outcome of the LOMR was an increased 100 -year flood elevation (approximately 889.5) in the Meadowbrook golf course and Rolling Green neighborhood. Since the 2007 LOMR, the MN DNR worked with FEMA to improve the hydrologic and hydraulic model of Minnehaha Creek. The 100 -year flood elevation included in the preliminary FIRM for this area is now 891. Subtask 3A. Preliminary evaluation of proposed FEMA determination To understand the reason for the differences in 100 -year flood elevations from the revised hydrologic and hydraulic model and determine whether the proposed FEMA determination should be appealed, Barr will conduct the following tasks: C Preparation of a timeline,documenting revisions to the FEMA 100 -year floodplain elevation and associated modeling efforts in'the Rolling Green area © Verification that the proposed 100 -year elevation (89 1) reflects the results from the most recent MCWD hydrologic,and hydraulic model and discussion with MN DNR and FEMA regarding the reason for the increase in flood elevation (from 2007 LOMR) • Review of the digital elevation data used to map the floodplain shown on the preliminary FIRM and comparison with more current digital elevation data (Mn DNR LiDAR, 2011) • Review of FEMA's revised XP -SWMM model and comparison with the model used for the 2007 Park Nicollet LOMR to understand the differences-in the 100 -year flood elevations and evaluate the need for City appeal PAMp1s\23 MM27 \2327354 \WorkFiles\2013\FEMA Evaluations\ Scope_ Letter_ FEMA _PrelimFIRM_Eval_5- 29- 2013.docx Ms. Laura Adler May 29, 2013 Page 5 The results of the preliminary evaluation will be summarized and presented to City staff in a meeting to determine if further evaluation is necessary. Subtask 3A. Estimated cost range: $3,000 - $7,000 Subtask 3B. Additional evaluation and preparation of relevant -information for appeal submittal If deemed necessary, the modeling and/or mapping of the 100 -year floodplain in the Rolling Green area will be revised and documentation regarding the modeling and/or mapping will be prepared. Note that the estimated cost below includes preparation of submittal information, but does not include time for addressing follow -up questions and/or discussions with MN DNR and FEMA, which would potentially be additional cost. Subtask 3B. Estimated cost range: $4,000 - $10,000 Cost Summary The table below summarizes the estimated cost ranges identified above in Tasks 1 through 3. We propose to perform the described scope of services on a time and expense basis. P:\Mp1s\23 MN\ 27\2327354 \WorkFiles\2013\FEMA Evaluations\ Scope_ Letter_ FEMA _PrelinTMM_Eva1_5- 29- 2013.docx Low High Task Task Description Estimated Estimated Cost Cost lA Morningside Area: Preliminary evaluation of proposed FEMA $ 1,000 $2,000 determination 1B Morningside Area: Additional evaluation and preparation of $1,000 relevant information for appeal submittal .$5,000 2A Nine Mile Village: Preliminary evaluation of proposed FEMA $1,000, $1,500 determination 2B Nine Mile Village: Additional evaluation and preparation of $2,000 $5,000 relevant information for appeal submittal 3A Rolling,Green Area: Preliminary evaluation of proposed FEMA $3,000 $7,000 determination 3B Rolling Green Area: Additional evaluation and preparation of $4,000 $10,000 relevant information for appeal submittal Total for Preliminary Tasks 1A, 2A, and 3A $5,000 $10,500 Total for all Tasks $12,000 $30,500 P:\Mp1s\23 MN\ 27\2327354 \WorkFiles\2013\FEMA Evaluations\ Scope_ Letter_ FEMA _PrelinTMM_Eva1_5- 29- 2013.docx Ms. Laura Adler May 29, 2013 Paae 6 We appreciate the opportunity to continue providing engineering services to the City of Edina and look forward to working with you on this project. If the proposed scope of services and associated fees are satisfactory, please sign a copy of this letter in the space provided, and return it to us at your earliest convenience. Sincerely yours, BARR ENGINEERING CO. By Robert C. Obermeyer Its Vice President Accepted this _ day of , 20_ CITY OF EDINA C Its P:\Mpls\23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013\FEMA Evaluations\ Scope_ Letter_ FEMA _PrelimFlRM_Eval_5- 29- 2013.docx (A. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Cn �y • ,MCORMR -1 O • 1688.: Agenda .Item #: IV.. E. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 4, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Agreement With Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for Edina. Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan Action Requested: Authorize Mayor to sign attached Cooperative Agreement between Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina for Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan. Information / Background: Attached is a cooperative agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for professional services with BARR Engineering Company for the concept development of the water resources component for the northerly Centennial Lakes drainage area. This project explores an opportunity for regional stormwater management planned in coordination with the promenade landscape feature and other potential developments within this drainage area. The City's cost for this study is not to exceed $20,000. This study will be funded through the Storm Water Utility Fund. Attachments: • Cooperative Agreement between Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina for Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan • Work Plan — Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan G: \PW\INFRAS \PARK MAINT DIV\Parks \Centennial Lakes Park \Promanade Area\Phase 4 \Item IV E Agreement With Nine Mile Creek Watershed District For Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Between the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan This Agreement is, made by and between''the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD); -a watershed district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D, and the City of Edina ( "Edina "), a statutory city'of the State of Minnesota. Recitals.and Statement of Purpose WHEREAS the NMCWD has an approved Water Resources Management Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103B that includes goals of managing stormwater flows on site and improving water quality in Nine Mile Creek; k, WHEREAS Edina has an approved Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan that includes goals of managing stormwater to provide flood protection and clean water services, a Wellhead Protection Plan that includes the goals of managing pollution risk,to the aquifers that provide domestic water supply, and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that includes goals of: reducing,pollu,tant discharge to local water bodies; WHEREAS both the NMCWD and Edina pursue these goals through various programs including regulation of. redevelopment and working with private property owners to, incorporate innovative and effective stormwater management methods; WHEREAS the NMCWD and Edina wish to explore the potential for use of such methods within the Centennial Lakes watershed and in conjunction with certain expected redevelopment activity within that watershed; THEREFORE the NMCWD and Edina hereby enter into this legally binding agreement to undertake and jointly fund an engineering study for this .purpose, according to the following terms. 1 r� AGREEMENT T. The NMCWD will enter into a professional services agreement with Barr Engineering Company to perform the scope of services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein ( "Services'). 2. Edina will have input into the Services through,the structured meetings and review opportunities stated in Exhibit A. 1n addition, Edina may communicate -with the NMCWD at any time regarding the Services. The NMCWD retains its discretion in directing the performance of the Services and administering the contract with. Barr Engineering, subject to the approval'-of Edina, and will incorporate Edina's input and both the NMCWD and Edina have to agree on the acceptance of Barr Engineering's report. Any written communication between either party and Barr Engineering will be copied to the other Party 3. The NMCWD and Edina will facilitate.Barr Engineering's performance of the Services by all means within their reasonable administrative capacity. If Barr Engineering requires entry onto public or private property for the purpose of the Services, Edina will use its good offices to assist in securing any necessary permissions and the parties will coordinate to afford Barr Engineering the use of their legal authorities to enter, as necessary and as they judge legally sound. The final report will acknowledge financial support from both the NMCWD and Edina. , 4. The NMCWD will provide for the professional services contract to identify Edina as an intended beneficiary of the Services; to extend duty of care, insurance and indemnification requirements to both the NMCWD and Edina; and to state that Edina and the NMCWD jointly share all rights to use of the final Barr Engineering report and any rights in the event of a breach of the contract by Barr Engineering. 5. Within 30 days of NMCWD invoicing, Edina will reimburse the NMCWD for one -half of amounts the NMCWD pays to Barr Engineering, for the Services, up to an aggregate total of $20,000. Edina will not withhold reimbursement to the NMCWD on the basis of dissatisfaction with the Services., If either party is dissatisfied with the Services, the parties will consult in good faith to resolve the dissatisfaction. 6. If the Services or the performance of this Agreement requires the sharing of data that is defined as not public under the Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 13 (DPA), the NMCWD and Edina will cooperate•to preserve the classification of the data and otherwise conform to the DPA. If Edina receives a request for data pursuant to the DPA that may encompass data Edina possesses or has created as a result of this Agreement, it j will inform the NMCWD and transmit a copy of the request. ]f the request is addressed to the, NMCWD, Edina will not provide any information or documents, but will direct the inquiry to the NMCWD. If the request is addressed to Edina, Edina will be responsible to determine whether it is legally required to respond to the request and otherwise what its legal obligations are, but will notify and consult with the NMCWD before replying. 7. The official representatives of the parties with respect to this Agreement are as follows: NMCWD: Administrator Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Edina: Director of Engineering 8.7he parties will-use the product of the Services in good faith to explore stormwater I olume reduction opportunities,% jointly and individually. However, nothing in this Agreement obligates either the NMCWD or Edina to any specific undertaking or any commitment`.of funds beyond the funding of the Services as set forth herein. 9. This Agreement is the complete and entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, representations and understandings, if any, between the parties respecting such matters. This Agreement may be amended only, by a writing signed by both parties. This Agreement terminates on the completion of the Services and Edina's fulfillment of its reimbursement obligations.hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement. I NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota By J Its President Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION 3 �1 CITY OF EDINA, a statutory city By Dated: Its Mayor 4 By District Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION By City Attorney To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Ross Bintner P.E. Environmental Engineer Date: June 4, 2013 oe t� •' IBBB roRPB8 j . Agenda Item #: 'IV. F. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject, Agreement with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for Grant and to Purchase an Electric Vehicle. Action Requested: Accept Grant, Authorize Mayor to Sign Grant Agreement Between the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the City of Edina and Authorize Purchase of an Electric Vehicle. Information / Background: Staff applied for a grant to complement 'the proposed purchase of a new vehicle for the Engineering Department under Capital Improvement Plan item ENG -13 -019. The application was successful and the City was awarded $5,000 toward the purchase of an all- electric vehicle. The City owns a variety of electric vehicles including golf carts and Zamboni, but if approved, this.will be first electric vehicle in the road fleet. This grant presented an opportunity to meet increased vehicle demands in the Engineering department, evaluate a new technology and promote sustainability goals outlined in Chapter 10 of the Comprehensive Plan that imagine a "green fleet." Grant Information Eligible projects for the local air pollution grant included installation of electric car charging stations, purchase of electric vehicles, implementation of route optimization software, development of a'fleet management plan to increase average fuel economy, or targeted education to institutionalize performance tracking systems and driving habits. Grant funds of $75,000 were available, with maximum grant awards of $5,000. The successful grant application for the purchase of an electric vehicle is attached, and the work plan is made part of the contract with the State. The work plan commits the City to purchasing an electric vehicle, commissioning a stylized partial vinyl wrap, creating a web page and tracking and communicating costs and benefits of operations. Purchase Information The fleet manager has reviewed state and federal joint purchasing contracts and electric vehicles were unavailable using these purchasing methods. Three quotes were received for local auto dealerships: City of Edina 4801 W. 50" St. Edina, MN 55424 0 Compan Quot e I. Kline Nissan (Leaf) $27,700.00 2: Feldman's Nissan (Leaf) $30,452.00 3. Metropolitan Ford (Focus) $40,673.25 The low quote was for $27,700 with additional tax and fees of approximately $2,375. An estimate for the stylized vinyl wrap is $700. $30,775 total costs are expected or $25,775 after grant revenue with approval of this item. Delivery could range from 30 -90+ days depending on availability. Policy Information Related Comprehensive Plan policy descriptions include: 10.2 Reduce;greenhouse gas emissions 10.7 Importance of fleet in City energy diet 10.10 Importance.of vehicle use to air quality Related Comprehensive Plan environmental goals include: 10.2.C.8. Increase average fuel efficiency of municipal fleet 10.2.C.12 Public education on sustainability topics 10.3.4 Lead by example in conserving energy in city fleet Attachments: Grant Application Grant Agreement G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENVIRONMENT DIV \EEEP \EV Grant Application \Item IV F Agreement With Minnesota Pollution Control Agency For Grant And To ' Purchase An Electric Vehicle.docx Minnesota Pollution Attachment Aa Application Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North for Local Government Air Pollutant St. Paul, MN5SISS -4194 Emissions Reduction Projects Instructions on how to complete the application are located on the last page of this application form. Please read the Request for Proposals (RFP) before submitting this application. Part I Applicant / Project Information .Applicant name (6ity,1ownship, county): City of Edina Project title: Electric Vehicle Purchase Project summary (limited to 1000 characters): The City of Edina has taken a leadership role in energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction in City operations. This grant will enable the City to upgrade the purchase of a standard pool vehicle to an electric vehicle. City vehicles are highly visible in;the community and this will be the first on- the -road electric vehicle in the City fleet. The vehicle will be styled to draw attention to the alternative fuel source using.a partial vinyl wrap to better serve as a demonstration of technology through its presence' in the community. Community engagement and education will be enhanced and through reporting operating and maintenance costs on the City website. Experience from this grant will inform future city fleet purchase decisions. Project type ❑ A. Installation of electric vehicle charging station(s) for fleet or public use. M B. Purchase of a plug -in electric vehicle or plug -in gas/electric hybrid vehicle for fleet use. ❑ C. Implementation or enhancement of route optimization software for snowplows, street sweepers.or other vehicles. ❑ D. Development of a fleet plan for increasing the average fuel economy. ❑ E. Education of employees, including developing a performance tracking system for efficient driving habits, including idling reduction. Part 2 Experience and Qualifications 2a. Applicant's experience /qualifications: Purchase of a new vehicle, tracking ongoing maintenance and operation expense and sharing results on the City of.Edina website are routine functions of City staff and not proposed as grant reimbursable expenses or match. 2b. If applicable, significant participants) /partners experience /qualifications: Part 3 Project Work Plan 3a. Attach 'a project work plan. (use format provided in Instructions, below) and Budget (Attachment B). 3b. Attach a projected environmental outcomes table (use format provided in Instructions, below). www.oca.state.mn.us 651 - 296 -6300 800 - 657 -3864• TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800 - 657 -3864 mm- rfp1 -09b • 1112112 Page 1 of 2 Part,3 Project Work Plan Task 1: Purchase Electric Vehicle (EV) Description: City fleet manager will purchase new Nissan Leaf and commission a stylized partial vinyl wrap that draws attention to the Edina EV web presence. Timeframe: June 2013 Person(s) Responsible: Fleet Manager Task.2: Track 3 -year Cost of Operation . Description: City fleet manager will track total cost of operation and maintenance Timeframe: June 2013 —June 2016 Person(s) Responsible: Fleet Manager Task 3: Web Presence Description: Restyle www.edinagogreen.org or new domain with EV content and progress report on this grant with links to other.City; sustainability initiatives such as the Home Energy Squad and Edina Emerald Energy Program. Timeframe: June 2013 — June 2016 Person(s) Responsible: Environmental Engineer Task 4: Evaluate and Report Description: Report ongoing cost of operation, environmental benefit and ability of car to meet user needs on City website: Produce final report to,grant authority that includes metrics on. cost/benefit and environmental services as well as narrative describing user and community feedback received during the course of the 3 year reporting period. . Timeframe: June 2016 Person(s) Responsible: Environmental Engineer Projected Environmental Outcomes Project type Estimated fuel reduction (gal. of gas per r. ) Estimated GHG reduction (lb of CO2 a uiv/ r: ) Estimated economic savings (total dollars •5 ear Electric Vehicle 535.7 5,583 $6371 Track and share results via website - - - tsumate summary anacneo;'"Aiternative venicle uecision Iooi.- Part 31b Project Budget Summary — See Attachment B for detail. Task 1: Purchase Electric Vehicle GRANT: $5000: MATCH: $26,745.20 + $700.00 Task 2: Track 3 -year Cost of Operation GRANT: $0 MATCH: $0 ADD'L IN -KIND: 8 hrs /year Task 3: Track 3 -year Cost of Operation GRANT: $0 MATCH: $0 ADD'L IN -KIND: 16 hrs /year Task 4: Evaluate and Report GRANT: $0 MATCH: $0 ADD'L IN -KIND: 8 hrs /year in first 2 years, 16hrs in year 3. www.oca.state.mn.us 651 - 296 -6300 800 - 657 -3864• TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800 - 657 -3864 mm- rfp1 -09b • 1112112 Page 2 of 2 Enter appropriate values in the yellow cells. As you enter your data, note on the graph which type of vehicle has low accumulated discount costs in a particular year of operation (the lower line means cheaper). This spreadsheet is designed for sensitivity analysis — changing variables to determine the effects of these changes. Try different values in the yellow cells, such as purchase price of the vehicle and how many miles you expect to drive per year, and see what effect they have on cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This tool downloaded from the University of Minnesota Extension publication, Should I buy an alternative vehicle ?, at exte Monthly payments, gas usage and GHG emissions in first five years Monthly car payments (if financed) Monthly opportunity cost of down payment or purchase Average monthly gasoline payments Average monthly engine maintenance costs Average monthly electrical payments Monthly costs (ownership, fuel, engine maintenance) Difference in monthly payments in first 5 years vs. conventional Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions Annual gasoline usage (gal.) Annual electricity usage from grid (kWh) Annual GHG emissions from gasoline usage (lb. of CO2 equiv.) Annual GHG emissions of electricity source (lb. of CO2 equiv.) Total Annual GHG emissions (lb. of CO2 equivalent) Annual GHG reduction in metric tonnes per year Effective CO2 tax charged to self by owning alternative vehicle per metric tonne Extended range Car pricing and performance assumptions Hybrid vehicle Hybrid vehicle EKMk vehicle electric Negotiated Purchase Price (plus charging station) $ 24,000 $ $ 31,745 #NUMI Down payment (if financed) or total purchase price $ . $ - 5 Months of car loan 360 360 #DIV /0! Interest rate on car loan 4.SD% 4.50% $ 25.35 Income tax credits for hybrid, electric, and charging station $ - #DIV /01 Cost of battery service assumed in year 8 #NUMI $ $ 4,000 #NUMI Miles per gallon of gasoline 28 $ (117.58) #NUMI Miles per kilowatt -hour of electricity #DIV /01 4.0 #DIV /01 Expected miles per year 15,000 - 3,750 #DIV /01 Annual miles from grid electricity (less or equal to above figure) #DIV /01 - #DIV /0 Gasoline and electricity prices, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions rates, and discount rate 6,680 #DIV /0 Gasoline (E70) price for life of car $3.75 #DIV /01 6,680 #DIV /0 Additional cost of premium gasoline per gallon $0.25 (Affects fuel cost of extended range electric only) #DIV /01 Electricity price (arid) per kWh for life of car $0.1150 #NUMI (46) #NUMI Gas engine maintenance per 3000 miles $60.84 Personal discount rate applied to costs 3.50 %. (3HG emissions per MWh of electicity (tons) 1791.44 Pounds per Mwh (See E'ect -GHG tab GHG emission per gallon of gasoline (E10) 22.89 Pounds per gallon below; Monthly payments, gas usage and GHG emissions in first five years Monthly car payments (if financed) Monthly opportunity cost of down payment or purchase Average monthly gasoline payments Average monthly engine maintenance costs Average monthly electrical payments Monthly costs (ownership, fuel, engine maintenance) Difference in monthly payments in first 5 years vs. conventional Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions Annual gasoline usage (gal.) Annual electricity usage from grid (kWh) Annual GHG emissions from gasoline usage (lb. of CO2 equiv.) Annual GHG emissions of electricity source (lb. of CO2 equiv.) Total Annual GHG emissions (lb. of CO2 equivalent) Annual GHG reduction in metric tonnes per year Effective CO2 tax charged to self by owning alternative vehicle per metric tonne nsion.umn.edu/energy/vehicle. Accumulated discounted costs of ownership and operation of conventional, hybrid, electric, and extended range electric vehicles by year $40,000 — -- - 33,230 $30,000 - - - -- $20,000 n ntional $10,000 —H brid —s— Electric — + —Ext. Range Elect. 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Years of operation Accumulated discounted costs of ownership and operation in year 15 Ext. Range Electric,$_- -____.________L__.._._. - - " - "� $16,719 Hybrid $- Conventional $33,230 5- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (lb.) Ext. Range Electric Electric '- - - .- - - 6,680 Hybrid Conventional 12,263 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 Extended range Hybrid vehicle Electric vehicle electric $ 121.60 #NUMI $ 160.85 #NUMI $ $ . $ 5 $ 167.41 #DIV /0! #DIV /0! $ 25.35 $ 25.35 $ 25.35 $ 35.94 #DIV /01 $ 314.37 #NUMI $ 196.79 #NUMI #NUM! $ (117.58) #NUMI 535.7 #DIV /01 #DIV /01 - - 3,750 #DIV /01 12,263 #DIV /01 - #DIV /0 - - 6,680 #DIV /0 12,263 #DIV /01 6,680 #DIV /0 - #DIV /01 2.532 #DIV /01 #NUMI (46) #NUMI nsion.umn.edu/energy/vehicle. Accumulated discounted costs of ownership and operation of conventional, hybrid, electric, and extended range electric vehicles by year $40,000 — -- - 33,230 $30,000 - - - -- $20,000 n ntional $10,000 —H brid —s— Electric — + —Ext. Range Elect. 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Years of operation Accumulated discounted costs of ownership and operation in year 15 Ext. Range Electric,$_- -____.________L__.._._. - - " - "� $16,719 Hybrid $- Conventional $33,230 5- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (lb.) Ext. Range Electric Electric '- - - .- - - 6,680 Hybrid Conventional 12,263 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 SWIFT Grant Contract No.: 00400404000404061536 STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT This Grant Contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of the MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( "State" or "MPCA "), 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, and the CITY OF EDINA, 4801 West 50`x' Street, Edina, MN 55424 -1394, ( "Grantee "). Recitals 1. Under Minnesota Statute § 116.03, subd.2, the State is empowered to enter int6 this grant. 2. The State is in need of the City of Edina, to purchase an electronic vehicle. 3. 'The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant contract to the satisfaction of the State. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 1613.98 Subdivision 1, the Grantee agrees to minimize administrative costs as a condition of this grant. Grant Contract Term of Grant Contract 1.1 Effective date: May 6, 2013, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes y i -If, .v5, subdivision 2, v✓hichc vcr is later. The Grantee must not begin work under this grant contract until this contract is fully executed and the Grantee has been notified by the State's Authorized Representative to begin the work. 1.2 Expiration date: June 30, 2014, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. 1.3 Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant contract: Liability; State Audits; Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; Publicity and Endorsement; Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and Data Disclosure. 2 Grantee's Duties The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will conduct the Project as specified by the duties described in ATTACHMENT A, which is attached and incorporated into this Grant Contract. The Grantee will have the option of submitting all required reports electronically or by mail. 3 Time The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant contract. In the performance of this grant contract, time is of the essence. 4 Consideration and Payment 4.1 Consideration. The State will pay for all services performed by the Grantee under this grant contract as follows: (a). Compensation. The Grantee will be paid according to the breakdown of costs contained in the budget section of ATTACHMENT B. (b) Travel Expenses. Reimbursement for travel and subsistence expenses actually and necessarily incurred by the Grantee as a result of this Grant Contract will not exceed $0.00; provided that the Grantee will be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current "Commissioner's Plan" promulgated by the commissioner of Employee Relations. The Grantee will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside Minnesota unless it has received the State's prior written approval for out of state travel. Minnesota will be considered the home state for determining whether travel is out of state. (c) Total Obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the Grantee under this Grant Contract will not exceed $5,000 (Five Thousand Dollars). CR6631 SWIFT Grant Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 4.2. Payment (a) Invoices Upon execution of this Grant Contract the MPCA shall promptly pay the Grantee, after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for work actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced work. Invoices must be submitted at least quarterly, and be received within 30 days from the end of each quarter. Invoices shall include: o Name of Grantee • Grantee Project Manager • Grant Amount • Grant Amount available to date • Invoice Number • Invoice Date. • Purchase Order Number • MPCA Project Manager • State Grant Contract Number (SWIFT) • Invoicing Period (actual working period) o Subcontractor'invoices, if applicable Itemized labor (hourly breakdown), equipment Invoices for work done through June 30th each year must be submitted by July 31 or the invoice may not be paid. Invoices shall be submitted to: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Accounts Payable, 66 Floor 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4194 Or e-mail to: mpca.ap@state.mn.usH (subject line: Grantee Name, invoice.number, and SWIFT number) Invoices must be submitted timely. Conditions of Payment All services provided by the Grantee under this grant contract must be performed to the State's satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable _ federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6 Authorized Representative The State's Project Manager for this project is,Fran Crotty, 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155, 651- 757 -2297, fran.crotty@e,state.mn.us, or her successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee's performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this Grant Contract. The State's Project Manager must review all invoices prior, to being signed by the State's Authorized Representative. Grantee's Authorized Representative The Grantee's Authorized Representative is Wayne Houle, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 -1394, 952- 826 -0443, whoule@ci.edina.mn.us, or his successor. If the Grantee's Authorized Representative changes at any time during this AGREEMENT, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. Grantee's Project Manager The Grantee's Project Manager is Ross Bintner, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 -1394, 952- 903 -5713, RBintner @ Edina MN.gov, or his successor. If the Grantee's Project Manager changes at any time during this AGREEMENT, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. CR6631 SWIFT Grant Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 7 Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Contract Complete 7.1 Assignment. The Grantee shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant contract without the prior written consent of the State, approved by the same parties who executed and approved this grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.2 Amendments. Any amendments to this grant contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the, original grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.3 Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant contract, that failure does not waive the provision or the State's right to enforce it. 7.4 Grant Contract Complete. This grant contract contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 1 8 Liability The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney's fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this grant contract by the Grantee or the Grantee's agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant contract. 9 State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 1613.98, Subd.8, the Grantee's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Grantee or other party relevantt6-this grant agreement or transaction are subject to examination by the State and /or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this grant agreement, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, _whichever is later. 10 Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property 10.1. Government Data Practices. The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this grant contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee, receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. The Grantee's response to the request shall comply with applicable law. 10.2. Intellectual Property Rights (A) Intellectual Property Rights: All rights, title, and interest to all intellectual property rights, including all copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the WORKS and DOCUMENTS created and paid for under this Grant Contract, shall be jointly owned by the GRANTEE and the STATE. WORKS, shall mean all inventions, improvements, or discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes or disks, conceived, reduced to practice, created, or originated by the GRANTEE, its employees and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others, in the performance of this Grant Contract. "DOCUMENTS" shall mean the originals of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, disks, or other materials, whether intangible or electronic forms, prepared by the GRANTEE, its employees, or subcontractors, in the performance of this Grant Contract. The ownership interests of the STATE and the GRANTEE in the WORKS and DOCUMENTS shall be equal. The party's ownership interest in the WORKS and DOCUMENTS shall not be reduced by any royalties or revenues received from the sale of the products or the licensing or other activities arising from the use of the WORKS and DOCUMENTS. Each party hereto shall, at the request of the other, execute all papers and perform all other acts necessary to transfer or record the appropriate ownership interests in the WORKS and DOCUMENTS. CR6631 SWIFT Grant Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 (B) Obligations a. Notification: Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not patentable) is made or conceived for the first time, or actually or constructively reduced to practice by the . GRANTEE, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of this. Grant Contract, the GRANTEE shall immediately give the,State's Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and shall promptly furnish the Authorized Representative with complete information and/or disclosure thereon. All decisions, regarding the filing of patent, copyright, trademark or service mark applications and/or registrations shall be the joint decision ofthe'GRANTEE and the STATE, and costs for such applications shall be divided as agreed by the parties at the time of the filing decisions. In the event the.parties cannot agree on said filing decisions, the filing decision will be made by the STATE. b. Representation: The GRANTEE shall perform all acts, and take all steps, necessary to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the WORKS and DOCUMENTS are the sole property: of the GRANTEE and the STATE as agreed herein, and that no GRANTEE. employee, agent, or contractor retains any interest in.and to the WORKS and DOCUMENTS. The GRANTEE represents and warrants that the WORKS and DOCUMENTS'do not and shall not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of others. The GRANTEE shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the STATE, at the GRANTEE's expense, from any action or claim brought against the STATE to the extent that it is based on a claim that all or part of the WORKS or DOCUMENTS infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. The GRANTEE shall be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands, obligations, liabilities, costs, and damages including, but not limited to, attorney fees. If such a claim or action arises, or in the GRANTEE's or the STATE's opinion is likely to arise, the GRANTEE shall, at the STATE's discretion, either procure for the STATE the right or license to use. the intellectual property rights at issue or replace or modify the allegedly infringing WORKS or DOCUMENTS necessary and appropriate to .obviate the claim. This remedy shall be in addition to, and not exclusive of, other remedies provided by law. (C) Use of Works and Documents: The STATE and GRANTEE shall jointly have the right to make, have made, reproduce, modify, distribute, perform, and otherwise use the , WORKS, including DOCUMENTS produced under this Grant Contract, for noncommercial research, scholarly work, government purposes, and other noncommercial purposes without payment or accounting to the other party. No commercial development, manufacture, marketing,, reproduction, distribution, sales or licensing of the WORKS, including DOCUMENTS, shall be authorized without a future written contractual agreement between the parties. (D) Possession of Documents: The DOCUMENTS may remain in the possession of the GRANTEE. The STATE may inspect'any of the DOCUMENTS at any reasonable time. The GRANTEE shall provide a copy of the DOCUMENTS to the STATE without cost upon the request of the STATE. (E) Survivability: The rights and duties of the STATE and the GRANTEE, provided for above, shall survive the expiration or cancellation of this Grant Contract. 11 Workers' Compensation The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers' compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee's employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the State's obligation or responsibility. CR6631 SWIFT Grant Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 . 12 Publicity and Endorsement 12.1 -Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For,purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs; and similar public notices prepared by or for the Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract. 12.2 Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services. 13 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue. Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this grant contract. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 14 Termination 14.1 Termination by the State. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract with or without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the`Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 14.2 Termination for Cause. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract if the State finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this grant contract, that reasonable progress has not been made or that the purposes for which the funds were granted'have not been or will not be fulfilled. The State may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed. 14.3 Termination forinsufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract if: a) If funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient,to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the Grantee. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis; for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the contract is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that notice. 15 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. CR6631 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat ' ' 16A.15 and 16C.05. Signed: Date: SWIFT Contract No: 61536 PO No.: 3000007409 2. CITY OF EDINA The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant contract on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: Title: Date: SWIFT Grant Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 3. MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Bv: (with delegated authority) Title: Date: Distribution: Agency Grantee State' s Authorized Representative — On -Base Link CR6631 6 SWIFT Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 Attachment A: Work Plan City of Edina Project Title: Purchase of Electric Vehicle Grantee Project Manager: Robb Bintner, PE, Environmental Engineer Address: 4801 West 50th Street City: Edina State: MN Zip: 55424 Phone #: 952 - 903 -5713 E -mail: RBintner @EdinaMN.Rov Authorized Representative: Wayne Hould, Public Works Director /City Engineer Address: 4801 West 50th Street City: Edina State: MN Zip: 55424 Phone #: 952 - 826 -0443 E -mail: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us MPCA Project Manager: Fran Crotty Title: Project Manager Address: 520 Lafayette Road North City: St. Paul State: MN ZIP: 55155 Phone #: 651 - 757 -2297 E -mail: fran.crotty @state.mn.us CR6631 1 SWIFT. Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 Attachment A: Work Plan Project Work Plan Task 1: Purchase Electric Vehicle (EV) Description: City fleet manager will purchase new Nissan Leaf and commission a stylized partial vinyl, wrap that draws attention the Edina EV web presence. Timeframe: June '2013 Person(s) Responsible: City Fleet Manager Task 2: Track Cost of Operation Description: Will track the total cost of operation and maintenance until June 30, 2014. Plan to voluntarily track this information for an additional 2 years. Timeframe: June 2013 to June 30, 2014 Person(s) Responsible:. City Fleet Manager Task 3: Web Presence Description: Restyle www.edinagopreen.org or new domain with EV content and progress report on this grant with links to other City sustainability initiatives such as the Home Energy Squad and Edina Emerald Energy Program. Timeframe: June 2013 to June 30, 2014 Person(s) Responsible: Environmental Engineer Task 4: Evaluate and Report Description: Report ongoing cost of operation, environmental benefit and ability of car to meet user needs on City website. Produce final report to MPCA that includes metrics on cost /benefit and environmental services as well as narrative describing user and community feedback received until June 30, 2014. Plan to voluntarily track and report this information for an additional 2 years. Timeframe: June 30, 2014 Person(s) Responsible: Environmental Engineer CR6631 2 .f SWIFT Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 Attachment A: Work Plan Project Evaluation and Report Provide final document to MPCA required per the grant application for final project submittal and provide results on electric vehicle purchase and how this purchase provides positive impacts to reducing emissions and protect the environment. Projected Environmental Outcomes Proj2Ct 'tj pe Estimated fuel reduction. (gal of gas /diesel per yr.) Estimated reduction in vehicle miles traveled /yr. Estimated economic savings (total dollars) Charging station(s) Electric Vehicle - Track and share results via website .535.7- 5,583 $6,371 CR6631 3 Minnesota Pollution ffil Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MIN 59155 -4194 GRANT REQUEST SWIFT Contract No.: 0000000000000000000061536 Attachment B: Budget for Local Government Air Pollutant Emissions Reduction Projects Amount requested Purchase Nissan Leaf 1 I. II. III. ($5,000 maximum provided in the Work Plan from qty Unit Grant Match amount or 75% of total cost, Total + Matching funds /value of In -kind . Task 2-4: • Labor— Environmental Engineer Funds whichever is less) $ 5000 (25% minimum match required) $27,445.20 = .Total project cost: $32,445.00. SUMMARIZED BUDGET BY COST CATEGORY Add rows as necessary for each Task Purchase Nissan Leaf 1 I. II. III. IV. provided in the Work Plan from qty Unit Grant Match amount Match amount Total AiiachmenA — Application Task 2-4: • Labor— Environmental Engineer Funds (Cash) (In -kind) 'Budget i ask is Purchase Nissan Leaf 1 Each $5000.00 $26745.20 $26,745.20 - $31745.20 Partial Vinyl Wrap and Artwork 1 Each Y $700.00 Public Work Personnel Budget $700.00 Task 2-4: • Labor— Environmental Engineer 80 Hours 80 hours • Labor- Fleet Manager 32 Hours —32 hours Grand Total $5000.00 $27,445.20 112 hours 532.445.20 MATCH INFORMATION Nature of Match (cash or In -Kind) Description: For In -Kind, describe For Cash, list source(s) Amount /Value Secured? (Y or N) Cash — Purchase Engineering Equipment Budget $26,745.20 - Y Cash — Purchase Engineering Equipment Budget $700.00 Y Staff Time Public Work Personnel Budget Add'I in -kind Y I. Applicant is the sole source of matching funds for the proposed project? ® Yes [:]No If no, do the application materials identify secured matching funds? ❑ Yes ❑ No CR6631 1 To: I 'I R C MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL O 1rr), o lass Agenda1tem #: IV. G. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action IR Discussion ❑ Date: June 4, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Engineering Services - Public Engagement and Preliminary Engineering Services for 54th St W and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to sign attached proposal for Engineering Services and also attached master agreement with SEH, Inc. Information / Background: The 54th St W roadway from Wooddale Ave to France Ave and the bridge over Minnehaha Creek is programmed for reconstruction for 2014. When preparing the request for proposal for engineering services for this project staff realized that the storm water for this area needs to also be studied. Storm water drainage encompasses an area from 50th St W on the north, France Ave on the east and 54th St on the south. Potential future projects within this drainage area include local roadway projects, improvements within Arden Park, and potential improvements within the 50th and France business area. This project will analyze the storm water challenges then will develop an overall storm water management plan, while also providing a preliminary design for the 54th St W roadway and bridge project. The project includes a very robust public engagement process. Staff sent out request for proposals to five firms. Staff from Park & Recreation, Economic'Development, and Engineering, as well as staff from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviewed the proposals and interviewed the top three firms. The firms were reviewed for understanding the project, public engagement process, storm water management plan understanding, past experience, project team and cost. The review team determined that all of the firms have the ability to engineer the project but SEH was a step above in their proposed approach due to the public engagement portion of the project. SEH,is proposing to team up with Carroll, Franck, and Associates, who will design and deliver an authentic, transparent public engagement process. The fee for this portion of the project is $89,922.00. This project is listed in the 2013 CIP as Project #'s PW -01 -012 ($150,000) and PW -05 -003 ($180,000), which appropriated $330,000 for planning and design services. Staff is also including an updated Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services that our City attorney and SEH's attorney have prepared. Attachments: 0 SEH Proposal Letter Dated June 4, 2013 0 Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services with SEH —June 4, 2013 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • . Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 C Engineering Proposal for Public, Engagement and Preliminary Engineering Services for 54th St W and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan. G:U'WICENTRAL SVCSIENG DIVIPROJECTSUMPR NOSIBA416 54th St Bridge & Street RepairlADMINIMISCUtem IV. G. Engineering Services - Public Engagement and Preliminary Engineering For 54th St W and Arden Park Stormwater Management Plan.dotx �o SEN SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT June 4, 2013 Mr. Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina - Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina; MN 55439 Dear Mr. Houle: RE: City of Edina Public Engagement and Preliminary Engineering Services for 54th Street and Arden Park Area Storinwater Management Plan SEH No. P -EDINA 124251 10.00 The City of Edina is for living, learning, raising families, and doing business; for at least 30.-years SEH has supported the City's daily attainment of this mission. During the years we have served the City, the City has changed. What matters from those changes is what was learned. Your request for proposal includes piloting a public, engagement process and living streets guidelines. These pilots tell us the Cityy continues to work very hard on a refining its understanding of what's important to its residents and their expectations. We offer the City a fantastic.approach and team to help move to this next level. Our team features SEH's proven expertise in the City combined with the very unique services of Carroll, Franck &Associates (CFA). CFA's Ann, e Carroll designs and delivers authentic, transparent public engagement processes, bringing underrepresented'and unheard voices to the table; SEH'sproject manager Paul Pasko keeps our entire team committed to its approach that comprehensively integrates the disciplines of stakeholder engagement, planning and sustainability, and engineering. We will provide our services in accordance with our Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. We have enclosed our detailed proposal that includes our approach, narrative /work plan, timeline; background, and detailed cost breakdown calculating our not -to- exceed fee of $80,222.00. Our not -to- exceed fee includes reimbursable. expenses. If the City accepts this Supplemental Letter Agreement, we will bill the City monthly on an hourly basis for services, expenses, and equipment. This Supplemental Letter Agreement, proposal, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and the SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. As always, please contact me at 952.912.2611 or ppasko @sehinc.com with questions or comments. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, NIN 553.13 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer %mmsehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax Mr. Wayne D. Houle, PE June 4, 2013 Page 2 We're speechless about being asked to help the City meet its objectives through this project, except for two little words: thank you. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT(HEN�DRICKSON INC. �4, V zr Paul J. Pas To III, PE Project Manager and Client Service Manager PJP3 Enclosure c: Anne Carroll, Carroll, Franck & Associates Toby Muse, SEH p laekkdina% 124251\ I- gealkIO-contractslptoposalTmal proposaRS 14 13 spplm t1 fir egmnt rev 63 13.docx Accepted on this day of , 2013 City of Edina, Minnesota By: Name MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT made between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter. called the "OWNER ", and SHORT ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC., hereinafter called the 'ENGINEER ". OWNER intends: to secure professional ENGINEERING services, according to the terms of this Agreement dated June 4, 2013. 1. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT OWNER intends to secure professional consulting engineering, architectural, planning and/or land survey services on an ongoing basis for general City services and multiple projects, according to the terms of this agreement. OWNER and ENGINEER shall enter into project specific supplemental agreements. This Master Agreement shall be deemed incorporated into the Supplemental Agreements unless a Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that it is not incorporated. If there is a conflict between the terms of the Supplemental Agreement and the Master Agreement, the terms of the Master Agreement shall control unless the Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that despite the conflict the terms of the Supplemental Agreement apply. 2. PUBLIC EMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER 2.1 STUDY AND REPORT PHASE-/ FEASIBILITY REPORT 2.1.1. Consult with OWNERto clarify and define OWNER'S requirements for the Project, review available data and attend necessary meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.1.2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER'S providing or obtaining from others data or services of the types described in paragraph 4, and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services. 2.1.3. Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project and participate in consultations with such authorities. 2.1.4. Provide analyses of OWNER'S needs, planning surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective�sites and solutions. 2.1.5. Provide a general economic analysis of OWNER'S requirements applicable to various alternatives. 2.1.6. The ENGINEER shall conduct and prepare preliminary studies, layouts, sketches, preliminary field work, preliminary cost estimates, estimates of assessment rates, and shall assist the OWNER I in obtaining required subsurface investigations as required for the preparation of the Doc. #170480v.1 1 RNK: 5/23/2013 Feasibility Reports. The Feasibility Reports shall conform to the requirements of Minn. Stat. Chapter 429 if the cost of the project may be assessed in whole or part. The report shall contain schematic layouts, sketches and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to indicate clearly the considerations involved (including applicable requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction as aforesaid) and the alternative solutions available to OWNER and setting forth ENGINEER'S findings and recommendations. This Report will be accompanied by ENGINEER'S opinion of probable costs for the Project, including the following which will be separately itemized: construction cost and indirect cost consisting of engineering costs and contingencies, and (on the basis of information furnished by OWNER) allowances for such other items as charges of all other professionals and consultants, for the cost of land and rights -of -way, for compensation for or damages to properties, for interest and financing charges and for other services to be provided by others for OWNER. The total of all construction and indirect costs are hereinafter called "Total Project Costs ". 2.1.7. Furnish five (5) printed copies of the Study and Report documents and one (1) electronic file and review them in person with OWNER. 2.1.8. The ENGINEER shall assist with presenting the Feasibility Reports to the proper reviewing agencies and to the City Council. The ENGINEER shall. appear at the public hearing to present the information. 2.2 PRELMNARY DESIGN PHASE 2.2.1. In consultation with OWNER and on the basis of the accepted Study and Report documents, determine the general scope, extent and character of the Project; attend necessary meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.2.2. Prepare Preliminary Design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary drawings, outline specifications and written descriptions of the Project. 2.2.3. Advise OWNER if additional data or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 are necessary and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services. 2.2.4. Based on the information contained in the Preliminary Design documents, submit a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs. 2.2.5. Furnish preliminary legal descriptions and exhibits for all permanent and temporary easements anticipated to construct the Project. 2.2.6. Furnish three (3) copies of the above Preliminary Report documents and one (1) electronic copy and present and review them in person with OWNER 2.3 FINAL DESIGN PHASE 2.3.1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Report documents, the City's design standards, and the revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs prepare for incorporation in the Doc. #I 70480v. 1 2 RNK: 5/23/2013 Bidding Documents final drawings to show the general scope, extent and character-of the work to be furnished and performed by Contractoii(s) (hereinafter called "Plans ") and Specifications. 2.3.2. Provide technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for use in filing applications for .permits with or obtaining approvals of such governmental authorities as "have jurisdiction to ,.approve the design 'of the Project, . and _ assist OWNER in :consultations with appropriate authorities. The ENGINEER shall. submit all applications and easement descriptions to the appropriate agencies and submit copies to the OWNER. 2.3.3. Provide legal descriptions and exhibits for all easements, property,surveys •or related engineering services needed for the transfer of interests in "real property and field surveys for design purposes and engineering surveys and staking 'to enable Contractor(s)-top roceed.with theirwork. 2.3.4. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project Costs caused by changes in general scope, extent or character or design requirements of the Project or Construction Costs. Furnish to OWNER a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs based_ on the Plans and Specifications. 2.3.5. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where appropriate) bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of other related documents. 2.3.6. Attend necessary hearings and meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.3.7. , Furnish three (3) copies of the aboveodocuments and of the Plans and Specifications and present and review them in person with OWNER. 2.3.8. The ENGINEER shall furnish one copy of all design calculations as requested by OWNER. 2.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATING PHASE 2.4.1. The ENGINEER shall prepare and forward the Advertisement for Bids to the designated publications, official newspaper and the OWNER. The ENGINEER shall supply up to thirty (30) sets of full size final Plans and Specifications for use in obtaining bids and submitting for general review. The ENGINEER shall maintain a record of prospective bidders to whom Bidding Documents have been issued, attend pre -bid meetings and receive and process deposits for Bidding Documents. 2.4:2. Prepare Contract Documents. 2.4.3. . Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify or expand the Bidding Documents. 2.4.4. Consult with and advise OWNER as to the acceptability of the prime contractor and subcontractors, suppliers, and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s) Doc. # 170480v.1 3 RNK: 5/23/2013 (herein called "Contractor(s) ") for the portions of the work where acceptability is required by the Bidding Documents. 2.4.5. Consult with and advise OWNER concerning and determining the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitution prior to the award of contracts is allowed by the Bidding Documents. 2.4.6. Attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets and assist OWNER in evaluating bidder qualifications and recommendations on bids, and in assembling and awarding contracts for construction, materials, equipment and services. 2.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2.5.1. General Administration of Construction Contract. ENGINEER shall consult with and advise OWNER and act as OWNER'S representative. All of OWNER'S instructions to Contractor(s) will be issued through ENGINEER who will have authority to act on behalf of Owner to the extent provided in the General Conditions except as otherwise provided in writing. The General Conditions shall not be modified without the written agreement of the OWNER. 2.5.2. Visits to Site and Observation of Construction. In connection with observations of the work of Contractor(s) while it is in progress: 2.5.2.1. ENGINEER shall make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction as ENGINEER deems necessary in order to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the various aspects of Contractor(s) work. In addition, if requested by OWNER, ENGINEER shall provide the services of a Resident Project Representative (and assistants as agreed) at the site to assist ENGINEER and to provide more continuous observation of such work. Based on information obtained during such visits and on such observations, ENGINEER shall endeavor to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and ENGINEER shall keep OWNER informed of the progress of the work. 2.5.2.2. The Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be ENGINEER'S agent or employee and under ENGINEER'S supervision. 2.5.2.3. The purpose of the ENGINEER'S visits to and representation by the Resident Project Representative (and assistants, if any) at the site will be to enable ENGINEER to better carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned to and undertaken by ENGINEER during the Construction Phase, and, in addition, by exercise of ENGINEER'S efforts as an experienced and qualified design professional, to provide for OWNER a greater degree of confidence that the completed work of Contractor(s) will conform to the Contract Documents and that the integrity of the design concept as reflected in the Contract Documents has been Doc. #170480v.1 4 RNK: 5/23/2013 implemented and preserved by Contractor(s). On the other hand, ENGINEER shall not; during such visits or as a result of such observations of Contractor(s)' work in progress, supervise, direct, or, have control over Contractor(s)' work, nor shall ENGINEER have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for the Contractor(s)' means, methods, techniques, sequences,,, or..procedures of construction. selected by Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or, for any failure of Contractor(s) to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes,,. or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their work. Accordingly, ENGINEER can, neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume 'responsibility for Contractor(s)' failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2.5.2.4. If ENGINEER observes or otherwise becomes aware of defects or deficiencies in the. work, or nonconformance to the Contract Documents, ENGINEER shall promptly give written notice thereof to OWNER. 2.5.3. Defective Work. During such visits and on the basis of such observation, ENGINEER may disapprove of or reject Contractor(s) work while it is in progress if ENGINEER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents. 2.5.4. Interpretations and Clarifications. ENGINEER shall issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare work directive changes and change orders as required -for OWNER'S approval. 2.5.5. Shop Drawings. .ENGINEER shall review and approve (or take other appropriate action in respect of) Shop Drawings, samples and other data which Contractor(s) are required to submit, but only for conformance. with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action shall not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. 2.5.6. Substitutes. ENGINEER shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s). 2.5.7. Inspections and Tests. ' ENGINEER shall have authority, as OWNER'S representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work, and shall receive and review all. certificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their content complies with the requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents). ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely on the results of such tests. Doc. #170480v.1 5 RNK: 5/23/2013 2.5.8. ENGINEER shall respond to all written claims submitted by Contractor in a timely fashion. ENGINEER shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. 2.5.9. Applications for Payment. Based on ENGINEER'S on -site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, on information provided by the Resident Project Representative and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and schedules: 2.5.9.1. ENGINEER shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts and the OWNER shall verify the amounts. Such recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, and that, to the best of ENGINEER'S knowledge, information and belief, the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation). In the case of unit price work, ENGINEER'S recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of such work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Contract Documents). 2.5.9.2. By recommending any payment ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of Contractor(s)' work as it is furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in this Agreement and the Contract Documents. ENGINEER'S review of Contractor(s)' work for the purposes of recommending payment will not impose on ENGINEER responsibility to supervise, direct or control such work or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or Contractor(s)' compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not impose on ENGINEER responsibility to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used the money paid on account of the Contract Price, or to determine that title to any of the. work, materials or equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that there may not be other matters at issue between OWNER and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 2.5.10. Contractor(s)' Completion Documents. ENGINEER shall receive and review maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of insurance, tests and approvals which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) .in accordance with the Contract Documents (but such review will only be to determine that their content complies with the requirements of, and in the case of certificates on inspection, tests and approvals the results certified indicate compliance. with, the Contract Documents); and .shall transmit them to OWNER with written comments. 2.5.11. Inspections. ENGINEER shall conduct an inspection to determine if the work, is substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the completed work is acceptable so that ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, final payment to Contractor(s) and give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such recommendation and notice will be subject to the limitations expressed in paragraph 1.6.9.2. 2.5.12. Limitation of Responsibilities. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any Contractor, or of any subcontractor or supplier, or any of the Contractor(s)' or subcontractors' or suppliers' agents or employees of any other persons (except ENGINEER'S own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise furnishing or performing any of the Contractor(s)' work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 2.5.1 through 2.5.12 inclusive, shall be construed to release ENGINEER from liability for failure to properly perform duties and responsibilities assumed by ENGINEER in the Contract Documents. 2.6 OPERATIONAL PHASE 2.6.1. Provide assistance in the closing of any financial or related transaction for the Project. 2.6.2. Provide assistance in connection with the refining and adjusting of any equipment or system. 2.6.3. Assist OWNER in . training OWNER'S staff to operate and maintain the Project. Extensive training shall be mutually agreed upon within the Supplemental Agreement as Additional Services as defined in Section 3 of this agreement. 2.6.4. Assist OWNER in developing systems and procedures for control of the operation and maintenance of and record keeping for the Project. ` 2.6.5. Within ninety (90) days after completion of a Project, prepare a set of reproducible record prints of Drawings and'an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record Drawing requirements, attached hereto, showing those changes made during the construction process, based` on the marked -up .prints, drawings and other data famished by Contractor(s) to ENGINEER and which ENGINEER considered significant. ENGINEER will not be, responsible for any errors or omissions in the information provided by Contractor that is incorporated in -the record drawings and record documents. Final payment will be made only after record drawings are received by the OWNER Doc. #170480v.1 7 RNK: 5/23/2013 2.6.6. In company with OWNER, visit the Project to observe any apparent defects in the completed construction, assist OWNER in consultations and discussions with Contractor(s) concerning correction of such deficiencies, and make recommendations asp to replacement or correction of defective work. 2.6.7. Assist OWNER in preparation of assessment roll for City improvement projects, and attend assessment hearings. 3. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER 3.1 SERVICES REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. If authorized in writing by OWNER, ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in paragraphs 3. 1.1 through 3.1.12, inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement or Work Order and will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Section 6. 3.1.1. Preparation of applications and: supporting documents (in addition to those furnished under Basic Services) for private or governmental grants, loans or advances in connection with the Project; preparation or review of environmental assessments and impact statements;' review and evaluation of the effect on the design requirements of the Project of any such statements and documents prepared by others; and 'assistance in obtaining approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the anticipated environmental impact of the Project. 3.1.2. Field Services to make measured drawings of or to investigate existing conditions or, facilities, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished to OWNER by others. 3.1.3. '. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER'S schedule, character of construction or method of financing; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent -to the preparation. of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond ENGINEER'S control. J 3.1.4. Providing renderings or models for OWNER'S use. 3.1.5. Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by OWNER for Contractor(s)' work which is not executed or documents for out -of- sequence work. 3.1.6. Investigations and studies involving, but not limited to, detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; providing value engineering during the course of design; the preparation of feasibility, studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; assistance in obtaining fin" ancing for the Project; evaluating processes available for licensing; assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing; detailed quantity surveys of material, equipment and labor; and audits or inventories required in connection with construction performed by OWNER. Doc. #170480v.1 8 . RNK: 5/23/2013 3.1.7. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than Basic Services (which include, but are not limited to, customary civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering and customary architectural design incidental thereto); and providing data or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 when OWNER employs:,ENGINEER to provide such data or services in lieu of furnishing the same in accordance with paragraph 4.4. .3.1.8. Services during out -of -town travel required of ENGINEER other than visits to the site or OWNER'S office. 3.1.9. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except when_ such assistance is required to complete services called for in paragraph 2:4. 3.1.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals to supplement Basic Services under paragraph 1.7.3. 3.1.11. Preparing . to serve or serving as a consultant or 'witness for OWNER in any litigation, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project unless the ENGINEER is a defendant (except for assistance in consultations which is included as part of Basic Services. 3.1.12. Additional services in connection with the Project, including services which are to be furnished by OWNER in accordance with Section 4, and services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement. 3.2 SERVICES NOT REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. When required by the Contract Documents in circumstances beyond ENGINEER'S control, ENGINEER shall famish or obtain from others, as circumstances require during` construction and without waiting for specific authorization from OWNER, Additional Services listed in paragraphs 3.2.1 through 3.2.5,' inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Sery ices except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement. ENGINEER shall advise OWNER promptly after starting any such additional services which will be paid for by OWNER. 3.2.1. Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect changes requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic Services is not commensurate with the additional services rendered. 3.2.2. Services in making revisions to Plans and Specifications occasioned by the acceptance of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); and. services after the award to each contract in evaluating and determining the acceptability of an unreason_ able or excessive number of substitutions proposed by Contractor. 3.2.3.. Services resulting from significant delays, changes or price increases occurring as a direct or indirect result of material, equipment or energy shortages. 3.2.4. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) a significant amount of defective or Doc. #170480v.1 9 RNK: 5/23/2013 neglected work of any Contractor, (3) acceleration of the progress schedule involving services beyond normal working hours, and (4) default by any Contractor. 3.2.5. Services (other than Basic Services during the Operational Phase) -in connection with an Partial use of an art of the Project... OWNER prior to Substantial Completion. any YP J Y p P 4. , OWNER'S PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES. OWNER shall do the following: 4.1 Designate in, writing a person to act as OWNER'S representative with respect to the services to -be rendered` under: this Agreement, such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions 'receive information, interpret and define OWNER'S policies and decisions with respect to ENGINEER'S:,services for the Project. 4.2 Provide criteria and information as to OWNER'S requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints,, space, capacity and performance .requirements, flexibility and, expandability;. and any budgetary , limitations' and furnish copies of design and construction standards OWNER-will require to be included. in the Plans and Specifications. 4.3 Assist ENGINEER by placing at ENGINEER'S disposal all available information pertinent to the; Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. 4.4 Furnish to ENGINEER as required. for performance of ENGINEER'S Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached amendment, the following: 4.4.1. Data prepared by or services of others, including without limitation, borings, and subsurface explorations, hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials and equipment; 4.4.2. Appropriate professional interpretations of all the foregoing; 4.4.3: Environmental assessment and impact statements, if needed; 4.4.4. Property, boundary, easement, right -of -way, topographic and utility surveys; 4.4.5. Property descriptions; and 4.4.6. Zoning, deed and other land use restrictions; All of which ENGINEER may use and rely upon, in performing services under this Agreement. 4.5 Provide engineering surveys or authorize ENGINEER to establish reference points for construction to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with the layout of the work. 4.6 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public and private property as required for ENGINEER to perform services under this Agreement. Doc. #170480v.1 10 RNK: 5/23/2013 4.7 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, Drawings, Specifications, proposals and other documents presented by ENGINEER. Obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of ENGINEER. 4.8 Prepare applications and provide support for approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Project. 4.9 Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER may require or ENGINEER may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be raised by Contractor(s), such auditing service as OWNER may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid under the construction contract, and such inspection services as OWNER may require to ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule, regulations, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. 4.10 If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER at the site who is not ENGINEER or ENGINEER'S agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such other person and the affect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER and the Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be set forth in a supplemental agreement. 4.11 If more than one prime contract is to be awarded for construction, materials, equipment and services for the entire Project, designate a person or organization to have authority and responsibility for coordinating the activities among the various prime contractors. 4.12 Furnish to ENGINEER data or estimated figures as to OWNER'S anticipated costs for services to be provided by others for OWNER so that ENGINEER may make the necessary findings to support opinions of probable Total Project Costs. 4.13 Attend the pre -bid meeting, bid opening, pre - construction meetings, construction progress and other job related meetings and substantial completion inspections and final payment inspections. 4.14 Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope of timing of ENGINEER'S services, or any defect or nonconformance in the work of any Contractor. 4.15 Furnish, or direct ENGINEER to provide, Additional Services as stipulated in paragraph 3 of this Agreement or other services as required. 4.16 Require all Private Utilities with facilities in the OWNER'S right of way to: (a) Locate and mark said utilities upon request; Doc. #170480v.1 11 RNK: 5/23/2013 (b) Relocate and/or protect said utilities as determined necessary to accommodate the proposed Work; (c) Submit a schedule of the necessary relocation/protection activities to the OWNER for review. 4.17 Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Section 4. 5. PERIODS OF PROJECT SERVICE 5.1 The provisions of Section 6 and the various rates of compensation for ENGINEER'S services provided for elsewhere in this Agreement have been agreed to in anticipation of the orderly and continuous progress of the Project through completion of the Construction Phase. ENGINEER'S obligation to render services hereunder will extend for a period which may reasonably be required for the design, award of contracts, construction and initial operation of the Project including extra work and required extensions thereto. 5.2 The services called for in the Study and Report Phase will be completed and the Report submitted within the agreed period after written authorization to proceed with that phase of services which will be given by OWNER. 5.3 After acceptance by OWNER of the Study and Report Phase documents indicating any specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, ENGINEER shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the Preliminary Design Phase, and shall submit preliminary design documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs within the agreed period. 5.4 After acceptance by OWNER of the Preliminary Design Phase documents and revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs, indicating any specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, ENGINEER shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the Final Design Phase; and shall deliver Contract Documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs for all work of Contractor(s) on the Project within the agreed period. 5.5 ENGINEER'S services under the Study and Report Phase, Preliminary Design Phase, and Final Design Phase, shall each be considered complete when the submissions for that phase have been accepted by OWNER. 5.6 After acceptance by OWNER of the ENGINEER'S Drawings, Specifications and other Final Design Phase documentation including the most recent opinion of probable Total Project Costs and upon written authorization to proceed, ENGINEER shall proceed with performance of the services called for in the Bidding or Negotiating phase. This Phase shall terminate and the services to be rendered thereunder shall be considered complete upon commencement of the Construction Phase or upon cessation of negotiations with prospective Contractor(s). 5.7 The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the first prime contract to be executed for the work of the Project or any part thereof, and will terminate upon written recommendation by ENGINEER of final payment on the last prime contract to be completed. Doc. #170480v.1 12 RNK: 5/23/2013 Construction Phase services may be rendered at different times in respect of separate prime contracts if the Project involves more than one prime.contract. 5.8 The Operational Phase will commence during the Construction Phase and will terminate upon the last of the following ° events: (1).one year after the date'of Substantial Completion, as defined in the. Contract Documents, if the . last, prime contract for construction, . materials and equipment on which substantial completion is achieved; (2) after final payment to the Contractor(s); (3) after all known issues have been satisfactorily resolved. 5.9 If OWNER requests significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project, the time of performance: of ENGINEER'S services shall be adjusted equitably. 5.10 OWNER shall give prompt authorization to proceed or note proceed with any phase of services after completion of the immediately preceding phase. 5.11 In the, event that the work designed or specified by ENGINEER is to be furnished or performed under more than one prime contract, or if ENGINEER'S services are to be separately sequenced with the. work of one or more prime contractors (such as in the case of fast - tracking), OWNER and ENGINEER shall, prior to commencement of the Final Design Phase, develop a schedule for performance of ENGINEER'S services. -during the Final Design, Bidding or Negotiating and Construction Phases in order to sequence and coordinate properly such services as are applicable to the work under such separate contracts. 6. PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER 6.1 PAYMENT. For Project services, ENGINEER will be paid in accordance with the Supplemental Agreement between the parties for the Project. 6.2 OTHER PROVISIONS CONCERNING PAYMENTS. 6.2.1. If OWNER fails to make any, payment due ENGINEER for services and expenses within thirty five (35) days after receipt of ENGINEER'S statement therefor, the amounts due ENGINEER will be increased at the rate of one -half percent (1/2 %) per month from said thirtieth day, and in addition, ENGINEER may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges. 6.2.2. In the event of termination•by OWNER under paragraph 8.1 upon the completion of any phase of the Basic Services, progress payments due ENGINEER for services rendered through such phase shall constitute total payment for such services. In the event of such termination by OWNER during any phase of the Basic Services, ENGINEER will be. paid for services actually and necessarily rendered during that phase by ENGINEER'S principals and employees engaged directly on the Project, on the basis of ENGINEER'S Hourly Costs based upon the fee schedule on file with the City. Doc. #170480v.1 13 RNK: 5/23/2013 In the event of any such termination, ENGINEER also will be reimbursed for the reasonable charges of independent professional associates and consultants employed by ENGINEER to render Basic Services, and paid for all unpaid Additional Services and unpaid reimbursables. 6.2.3. Records of ENGINEER'S time pertinent to ENGINEER'S compensation under this Agreement will be kept in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Copies will be made available to OWNER at cost on request prior to final payment for ENGINEER'S services. 6.2.4. ENGINEER shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. ENGINEER must pay Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten (10) days of ENGINEER'S receipt of payment from OWNER. ENGINEER must pay interest of one and five - tenths percent (1.5 %) per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100) or more is Ten Dollars ($10). 7. CONSTRUCTION COST AND OPINIONS OF COST 7.1 CONSTRUCTION COST. The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as "Construction Cost ") means the total cost to OWNER of those portions of the entire Project designed and specified by ENGINEER, but it will not include indirect costs such as ENGINEER'S compensation and expenses, the cost of land, rights -of -way, or compensation for or damages to, properties unless this Agreement so specifies, nor will it include OWNER'S legal, accounting, insurance counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in connection with the Project or the cost of other services to be provided by others to OWNER pursuant to paragraph 4. (Construction Cost is one of the items comprising Total Project Cost which is defined in paragraph 2.2.6). 7.2 OPINIONS OF COST. Since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, ENGINEER'S opinions of probable Total Project Costs and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of ENGINEER'S experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER'S best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Total Project or Construction Costs will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by ENGINEER. 8. GENERAL 8.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Engineer as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Engineer is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Engineer shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Engineer shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Engineer's performance under this Agreement. City and Engineer agree that Engineer shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Engineer or any of Engineer's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Engineer shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Engineer's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding Doc. #170480v.1 14 RNK: 5/23/2013 amounts, and/or self - employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid bylaw or regulation. 8.2 TERMINATION. OWNER may terminate this Agreement and any, Supplemental Agreement without cause by written notice delivered to the ENGINEER. . Upon termination under this provision if.ther& is no fault, of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the OWNER terminates . the Agreement because the. ENGINEER has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment. shall be made to the ENGINEER,' and the OWNER may retain another contractor to undertake: or complete the work identified in the Contract Documents. If as a result, the OWNER incurs total costs for the work (including payments to both the present contractor and a future contractor) which exceed the not to exceed amount specified in the Contract. Documents, if any, then the ENGINEER shall be responsible for the difference between the cost actually incurred and the Agreement amount. 8.3 DOCUMENTS. All documents including Plans and Specifications prepared or furnished by ENGINEER (and ENGINEER'S independent professional associates and consultants) pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project and the OWNER will be provided with information and reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the Project by OWNER and others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by OWNER or others on extensions of the Projector on any other:project. Any reuse without written verification, or adaptation by ENGINEER for the specific purpose intended will be. at OWNER'S sole risk. If the OWNER or ENGINEER terminates this Agreement, copies of all' files, records, and drawings in ENGINEER'S possession relating to service performance for OWNER shall be turned over to OWNER without cost to OWNER. 8.4 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. The ENGINEER must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data,, created, collected, received; stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the ENGINEER pursuant -to this Agreement. The ENGINEER is subject to all the provisions of,the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. :In the event the ENGINEER receives a request to release data, the ENGINEER must immediately notify the OWNER. The OWNER will give the ENGINEER instructions concerning the release of the data to the. requesting .party before the data is released. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the OWNER, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from ENGINEER'S officers', agents', `owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 8.5 INSURANCE 8.5.1. ENGINEER shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect ENGINEER from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for Doc. #170480v.1 15 RNK: 5/23/2013 bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence /aggregate Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit Excess/Umbrella Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence /aggregate The OWNER shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and umbrella policies on a primary and non - contributory basis. 8.5.2. Professional Liability Insurance. The ENGINEER shall secure and maintain a professional liability insurance policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damages for legal liability arising out of the performance of professional services for the OWNER, in the insured's capacity as ENGINEER, if such legal liability is caused by a negligent act, error or omission of the insured or any person or organization for which the insured is legally liable. Said policy shall provide minimum limits of $1,000,000 with a deductible maximum of $50,000 unless the OWNER agrees to a high deductible. 8.5.3. Before commencing work the ENGINEER shall provide the OWNER a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to OWNER. The certificate shall provide that such insurance cannot be cancelled until thirty (30) days after the OWNER has received written notice of the insurer's intention of cancel this insurance. 8.6 INDEMNIFICATION. The ENGINEER agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold OWNER harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by ENGINEER's acts, errors, or omissions in the performance of professional services under this Agreement and those of his or her subcontractors or anyone for whom the ENGINEER is liable. 8.7 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS. ENGINEER shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional engineer under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. ENGINEER shall comply with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, and regulations and the OWNER's mandated standards that OWNER has provided ENGINEER in writing. OWNER shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of ENGINEER'S services. 8.8 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER. 8.9 CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this contract shall be venued in the Hennepin County District Court. Doc. #170480v.1 16 RNK: 5/23/2013 W 8.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS .8.10.1. OWNER and ENGINEER each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and ENGINEER are hereby bound to the other party, to_ this Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements, and obligations' of this Agreement. 8.10.2. Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall. assign, sublet.or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due) this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation maybe: restricted' bylaw. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any- written .consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent professional associates and consultants as ENGINEER may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 8.10.3. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the OWNER and ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party. 8.11 PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONSTRACTORS. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. - The Contractor must pay interest of 1' /2 percent per month or any part of the month. to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 8.12 COPYRIGHT/PATENT INFRINGEMENT. ENGINEER shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, Drawings or Specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the OWNER from loss or damage resulting there from. 8.13 NOTICES. Any notice required under, this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at its address on the signature page and given personally, by facsimile, by registered or certified mail postage prepaid, or by a commercial courier service. All notices shall be effective upon the date of receipt. 8.14 SURVIVAL. All express representations, waivers, indemnifications, and limitations of liability included in this Agreement will survive its completion or termination for any reason. Doc. #170480v.1 17 RNK: 5/23/2013 8.15 SEVERABILITY. Any provision or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any Laws or Regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and ENGINEER, who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 8.16 WAIVER. A party's non - enforcement of any provision shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. 9. PRIOR AGREEMENT This Agreement supersedes all prior written and oral contracts and agreements except for the following: General Engineering Services Project, West 70th Street/Final Landscape Design/Construction Project, Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Sewer, Water and Street Reconstruction Project, Veterans Memorial Project, Richmond Hills Park Roadway improvements Project, Antenna Projects, and Normandale Street Reconstruction Project. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: CITY OF EDINA BY: Its Mayor AND Its City Manager ADDRESS FOR GIVING NOTICES: Doc. #I 70480v. I RNK: 5/23/2013 ENGINEER: SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. BY: 9A is Senior Vice - President IN ADDRESS FOR GIVING NOTICES: Paul J. Pasko III, PE Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 VA SEH Building a Better World for All of Us" 4t 000 Proposal for Public Engagement and Preliminary Engineering Services for S4th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan City of Edina, Minnesota a ■ m Carroll, fa a � Franck W".1"", May 14, 2013 I. () 17, .7 NO Py 'CaR" -:Q I LD� I 3 4 F, if Al, R t r., 1 rq 4 r 14— -tl t4 9� rs "ToAl. IT Alp -;f A, P 77, L-- '_ — Pul AK Lk! k7 ORT-5p, 8=v 1.4 -r7 r Ag r,w IR lor d" 0. U1, Tl� -A SEH Building a Better World for All of Us'" May 14, 2013 Mr. Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina - Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Mr. Houle: RE: City of Edina Public Engagement and Preliminary Engineering Services for 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan SEH No. P -EDINA 124251 The City of Edina is for living, learning, raising families, and doing business; for at least 30 years SEH has supported the City's daily attainment of this mission. During the years we have served the City, the City has changed. What matters from those changes is what was learned. Your request for proposal includes piloting a public engagement process and living streets guidelines. These pilots tell us the City continues to work very hard on a refining its understanding of what's important to its residents and their expectations. We offer the City a fantastic approach and team to help move to this next level. Our team features SEH's proven expertise in the City combined with the very unique services of Carroll, Franck & Associates (CFA). CFA's Anne Carroll designs and delivers authentic, transparent public engagement processes, bringing underrepresented and unheard voices to the table; SEH's project manager Paul Pasko keeps our entire team committed to its approach that comprehensively integrates the disciplines of stakeholder engagement, planning and sustainability, and engineering. We're speechless about being asked to help the City meet its objectives through this project, except for two little words: thank you. Sincerely, e�, a'e -722Z— Paul J. Pasko IIl, PE Project Manager and Client Service Manager Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax 'i 0.- IT Table of Contents Understanding/Approach ...................................... I Narrative/Work Plan ............................................. 4 Work Plan/Timeline/Deliverables ...................... 10 •7 Background/Experience-Tearn Overview......... 12 jt`, Background/Experience-Discipline Leaders .... 15 Background/Experience-Discipline Support.... 18 Detailed Cost Breakdown ....... .............................20 V rwi IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Understanding /Approach Community infrastructure projects have never been more complex than they are today. Even when the technical need is irrefutable, many projects in fully built neighborhoods carry high price tags, cause disruption, require widely varied expertise, and face vigorous neighborhood contest — for which most cities and consulting firms are simply not prepared. This project illustrates that messy constellation of challenges and opportunities, for which we have brought together a diverse, multidisciplinary team poised to serve Edina with an innovative, collaborative, and integrated approach. Rehabilitating an aging 54th Street allows reimagining and renewing 54th Street's key transportation infrastructure and a variety of environmental infrastructure in the Minnehaha Creek subwatershed. With this infrastructure comes an equal opportunity to provide meaningful stakeholder engagement. Our engagement will help participants understand project parameters and reach consensus on sustainable infrastructure improvements. If achieving this balance results in the City providing expanded services, then the services must have a reasonable cost. If the balance results in a plan to guide future environmental improvements, that plan must be consistent with the expectations of not just affected neighborhoods, but the broader community including Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). The plan must be integral enough to guide the reconstruction of 54th Street and upcoming neighborhood street reconstruction and potential future redevelopment projects. A typical approach to a project like this closely coordinates technical and engagement work, for example the technical team usually provides the engagement team with key information for public meetings. The triple helix graphic below shows that SEH will ratchet the typical approach up an order of magnitude by comprehensively integrating the technical and engagement project disciplines while also adding a planning and sustainability discipline. Our triple helix illustrates our commitment throughout this project to the core of our approach; the integration of stakeholder engagement, planning and sustainability, and engineering disciplines. Sharing the core of . 50 this approach is respect and humility and resistance to the urge to present detailed design too soon. While our SEH team, City staff, City commissions, and partners like MCWD bring extensive technical and design expertise, we understand that we do not speak for community stakeholders. Our Work Plan is therefore built around internationally recognized engagement principles and values: We set clear goals and make only the promises we know we can keep, provide technical information and context at a level so participants can meaningfully contribute, create authentic spaces and listen to diverse voices, and collaboratively explore rigorously defined scenarios that weave together community needs, technical requirements, and stakeholder priorities. Day by day, together we build broad, informed, and durable consensus. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page I The City of Edina has long supported sustainability principles to create a safer, more livable, and welcoming transportation network and community for everyone. In the context of this project, `everyone' is shown in the preliminary stakeholder map below. The City has moved to action through efforts such as multimodal transportation, street vitality, Green Steps, Fit City, and do.Edina. Our approach honors this commitment by infusing new Living Streets guidelines and principles, nationally recognized Envision sustainability evaluation, and leading -edge water resource options into our highly interactive stakeholder engagement, inclusive 54th Street redesign, and innovative Arden Park Stormwater Management Plan. Living Streets Guidelines and Principles Together with staff, key partners, and stakeholders, we will define a reasonable balance for the West 54th Street corridor. The street is a collector traveling through a primarily residential neighborhood. It is one of few Minnehaha Creek crossings and provides direct driveway access to residents. Recognizing the scope of State Aid design standards, Living Streets principles, the new bicycle facilities, and an established neighborhood makes it challenging to balance the needs of adjacent residents, area mothers with jogging strollers headed to Arden Park, Route 6 Metro Transit bus users, and church members needing on- street parking. These varied and sometimes conflicting stakeholder perspectives and preferences within the regulatory context make our team's transparent, integrated, and iterative approach essential for success. We won't be designing the typical large -scale meetings where people shout out their personal positions and are completely disconnected from policies, community needs, and their neighbors' ideas and interests. We will design engagement opportunities for stakeholders to respectfully explore preferences and options with their associated implications and tradeoffs, and in the context of Living Streets. For example, people may support Living Streets policies that prioritize vulnerable users such as children -- until they learn that the sidewalks needed to accomplish that would take out the driveways and retaining walls their neighbors have built in the City's right -of -way. Our well - designed and facilitated engagement, clear understanding of Living Streets and innovative design principles, and tailored tools and techniques will help stakeholders understand the full range of issues and perspectives, and move toward consensus. Envision: Sustainability Evaluation SEH is a charter member of the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure's Envision rating system. This unique new framework unites over 900 sector - specific systems into a comprehensive tool to evaluate and rate the community, environmental, and economic benefits of infrastructure projects. It was developed jointly by APWA, ACEC, and ASCE in partnership with Harvard University's Zofnass Program for Sustainable Infrastructure. page 2 1 City of Edina • 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stonmwater Management Plan Our SEH team's certified Envision Sustainability Professional will guide our use of this tool, integrating programs and policies such as Living Streets, sustainability principles, and Green Steps into this important project. The Envision system supports transformational, collaborative approaches that promote sustainable infrastructure development using a lifecycle approach. For each credit in the five categories, points are earned based on the level of achievement. As both an educational and planning tool, Envision helps project teams and communities understand the issues and opportunities for all aspects of infrastructure planning. Like our overall integrated approach, Envision will be a valuable tool at every step of this project. It will help our team, City staff, and key partners agree on sustainability terms and principles, and ensure consistent and clear communications and stakeholder engagement around sustainability. After we jointly refine the Envision credits for this project, we will use the tool to educate and engage stakeholders on sustainability principles so they.can identify important aspects of the project that critically impact their quality of life and environment. As we move into preliminary scenarios, the Envision tool allows stakeholders and the project team to compare the full range of "triple bottom line" impacts for each using a more objective assessment and balancing community, environmental, and economic factors. And as both technical staff and stakeholders are working from the same tool, Envision provides a clear framework for the preliminary design to incorporate the community's values into the project. Finally, for this pilot engagement effort, stakeholders could use the Envision tool as a visual scorecard or checklist to quickly and consistently assess how the project is progressing. Leading -edge Water Resource Options Edina's sustainability commitments and the current status of the Creek demand a more inclusive and integrated approach to stormwater management. This stretch of Minnehaha Creek is impaired for chloride, fecal coliform, dissolved oxygen, and fish bioassessments, which threaten aquatic life and recreational uses. Our approach for developing a plan to guide future stormwater and ecological enhancements in the project area and the Minnehaha Creek corridor models our uniquely integrated and transparent process. Our engagement design combines input from project stakeholders on current topics with educational information on the regulatory need and basis for stormwater management -- and weaves issues together with the Envision sustainability evaluation. Our iterative, scenario -based process assures technical coherence and regulatory alignment while supporting genuine stakeholder exploration of priorities, ideas, and alternatives to meet expectations and requirements. Our collaborative and closely integrated approach means we will work with the City, the MCWD as a key partner, and community stakeholders to develop an innovative and consensus -based stormwater plan. We will include details of how treatment credits throughout the study apply to a given project and how excess credits could be applied to future projects. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page 3 60 Credits in 5 Categories QUALITY OF LIFE Purpose, Community, Wellbeing QLEADERSHIP Collaboration, Management, Planning RESOURCE ALLOCATION Materials, Energy Water NATURAL WORLD Siting, Land & Water, Biodiversity CLIR ?Aic AhD Ri�,K Emission, Resilience The Envision system supports transformational, collaborative approaches that promote sustainable infrastructure development using a lifecycle approach. For each credit in the five categories, points are earned based on the level of achievement. As both an educational and planning tool, Envision helps project teams and communities understand the issues and opportunities for all aspects of infrastructure planning. Like our overall integrated approach, Envision will be a valuable tool at every step of this project. It will help our team, City staff, and key partners agree on sustainability terms and principles, and ensure consistent and clear communications and stakeholder engagement around sustainability. After we jointly refine the Envision credits for this project, we will use the tool to educate and engage stakeholders on sustainability principles so they.can identify important aspects of the project that critically impact their quality of life and environment. As we move into preliminary scenarios, the Envision tool allows stakeholders and the project team to compare the full range of "triple bottom line" impacts for each using a more objective assessment and balancing community, environmental, and economic factors. And as both technical staff and stakeholders are working from the same tool, Envision provides a clear framework for the preliminary design to incorporate the community's values into the project. Finally, for this pilot engagement effort, stakeholders could use the Envision tool as a visual scorecard or checklist to quickly and consistently assess how the project is progressing. Leading -edge Water Resource Options Edina's sustainability commitments and the current status of the Creek demand a more inclusive and integrated approach to stormwater management. This stretch of Minnehaha Creek is impaired for chloride, fecal coliform, dissolved oxygen, and fish bioassessments, which threaten aquatic life and recreational uses. Our approach for developing a plan to guide future stormwater and ecological enhancements in the project area and the Minnehaha Creek corridor models our uniquely integrated and transparent process. Our engagement design combines input from project stakeholders on current topics with educational information on the regulatory need and basis for stormwater management -- and weaves issues together with the Envision sustainability evaluation. Our iterative, scenario -based process assures technical coherence and regulatory alignment while supporting genuine stakeholder exploration of priorities, ideas, and alternatives to meet expectations and requirements. Our collaborative and closely integrated approach means we will work with the City, the MCWD as a key partner, and community stakeholders to develop an innovative and consensus -based stormwater plan. We will include details of how treatment credits throughout the study apply to a given project and how excess credits could be applied to future projects. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page 3 IAP2 Core Values for the Practice of Public Participation I. Public participation is based on the belief that those who are affected by a decision have a right to be involved in the decision - making process. 2. Public participation includes the promise that the public's contribution will influence the decision. 3. Public participation promotes sustainable decisions by recognizing and communicating the needs and interests of all participants, including decision makers. 4. Public participation seeks out and facilitates the involvement of those potentially affected by or interested in a decision. 5. Public participation seeks input from participants in designing how they participate. 6. Public participation provides participants with the information they need to participate in a meaningful way. 7. Public participation communicates to participants how their input affected the decision. www.iap2.org Narrative /Work Plan This Work Plan describes our team's commitment to a fully integrated, inclusive, and consensus -based approach. 1.0. Set Parameters I Write Stakeholder Engagement Plan Define project's broad engagement parameters, shape the stakeholder engagement design, collect critical technical data, and position important initial communications to stakeholders. Consensus established here is fundamental to meaningfully engaging stakeholders. I. Set Project Parameters Set project parameters via a workshop with lead City staff, City commission members, and key partners (such as MCWD) that will include the following: • Define technical and community parameters underlying the infrastructure. — Include parameters such as, but not limited to, improving creek water quality, increasing access to the creek and park, City pavement evaluation for 54th Street, the commitment to living streets, presence of the City well, opportunities to loop the water main, Municipal State Aid (MSA) street design requirements, sustainability goals, and funding sources. — Integrated within the workshop is reaching agreement on Edina's parameters for this pilot stakeholder engagement. • Determine engagement goals. — Use International Association for Public Participation's IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum to determine overall engagement goals and "promise to the public" for this pilot engagement effort. — Agree on the core values underpinning our engagement work (see sidebar on left). • Refine stakeholders. — Building from the sample stakeholders listed in the RFP, we will identify all key stakeholders and partners to share information and gather information, input, and feedback. — Agree on stakeholders and differentiate within sets of stakeholders; not all stakeholders have the same "stake" in all elements of this project, and the breadth and depth of engagement varies by stakeholder group. Identify key topics for communications and engagement: Decide on topics for which we need to provide information and on which we are — and are not — seeking input. For example, it is disingenuous to ask for "input" on MSA standards. Our commitment to transparency means we will be clear on the project's parameters and focus, support engagement on those, and after a certain point redirect input on other topics. page 4 1 City of Edina . 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan Customize sustainability tool: Using our team's certified Envision sustainability professional, identify applicable sustainability credits within the five categories (see summary figure on page 4) relevant to project parameters, engagement goals, identified users, and key topics. Determine core communications tools: Great communications are central to any authentic engagement and even more critical for this pilot, so we will identify this project's core and supplemental communications tools. Examples of likely tools include the City's project website, City Extra, project- specific blog on the City's website, Facebook, Twitter, periodic features in the community paper, and items in local /partner publications. 1.2. Prepare Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) The parameters we established in the workshop form the foundation for a robust SEP for this pilot engagement process. As the process roadmap, the SEP describes each set of stakeholders, plans to successfully engage them, responsibilities, schedule, and status. As a "living" document it allows for detours, so we will regularly update and refine it to meet evolving needs, and make the summary schedule widely available to support participation. 1.3. Collect and Review Existing Data Collect and review existing data from City and MCWD to ensure that all stakeholder engagement and technical analyses are aligned and fully informed. Examples of traditional and innovative tools and techniques grouped by objective: Objective: Generate ideas and gather input on broad questions from individuals. • Intercept surveys are an excellent and fun way to quickly gather relevant and substantive input as well as basic demographics in a way that appeals to participants; these 3 -4 minute surveys are easy to run with a host of trained volunteers or college students at community gathering spots, parks, and community events • Surveys on paper, in- person, by phone, and web -based allow large numbers of individuals to generate ideas, react or respond generally to options or alternatives, and identify missing information or resources • Social media provides a platform to share outbound information and identify emerging issues or questions; for this project, mainstream tools such as Facebook and Twitter would allow appropriate content oversight • In- person, video, and audio /phone interviews are useful ways to gather detailed information, perspectives, and priorities Objective: Generate ideas and gather input on broad questions from groups. • Community events and gatherings: Working with local partners, these allow us to quickly and cost - effectively share information and gather input from large numbers of stakeholders • Open space formats include stations for participants to get information, look at alternatives, provide written or oral input, and discuss issues or concerns; standalone events or with community sessions • Focus groups allow small groups of people over 2 -3 hours to better understand diverse perspectives, advance content or process, resolve confusion, identify themes, develop scenarios, and move toward consensus • Community information sessions: These widely publicized and larger -scale events are typically cohosted with key partners. Used to share information; present summary input, common themes, and points of divergence; and gather input or feedback. Various techniques are embedded such as open - space /stations with staff, storytelling booths, intercept or online surveys, presentations, etc.; used singly or in clusters. Objective: Explore options, examine alternatives, deepen understanding, move toward consensus, develop recommendations, or make decisions. • Study sessions: These hybrids help meet stakeholders' unique needs; small groups dig deeply into a specific topic, small number of options, or particular needs in one or more 2 -3 hour sessions • Workshops: These smaller - group, multi -hour sessions allow selected participants to tackle complex issues or challenges, develop options or alternatives, bridge differences, develop drafts, or reach consensus • Charettes: These heavily visual, collaborative events bring stakeholders together in one or more intensive work sessions to develop plans, deeply examine alternatives and options, and move toward consensus; charettes are often a full -day or more and may have multiple, iterative sessions Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page 5 2.0. Tell the Story I Gather Issues 2.1. Tell the Story A thoughtful set of stakeholder communications serves as a "soft launch" to this consensus -based stakeholder engagement pilot. Based on our earlier agreements, we will jointly craft initial communications with common core content nuanced by stakeholder category (e.g., partners /regulatory agencies, 54th Street neighbors, commission or task force members, etc.). Sample core content: Succinct description of the project needs /parameters; the City's commitment to authentically integrating stakeholder perspectives into planning, design, and decision making, information resources; and initial engagement opportunities. We anticipate City distribution via mail or similar means to ensure receipt by all identified stakeholders, supplemented by agreed -upon communications channels. 2.2. Gather Stakeholder Issues on Initial Topics Based on the jointly identified topics and guided by the SEP, we will begin "scans" with identified stakeholders to understand their key issues. Here we would be seeking individual perspectives and expect divergence, so informal in- person and online tools would be appropriate. Actual methods will be driven by the SEP, but below are realistic examples. • For area residents, we may lead trained teams of college students for evening and weekend "doorknocking." Wearing City t- shirts and nametags, they would carry copies of the earlier "Tell the Story" letters plus a summary handout, the list of selected key topics, and in 2 -3 short questions ask stakeholders about their issues, interests, or concerns. Team members would write the responses in real time, then enter the data daily for compilation and analysis. • For Council and Mayor, City commission and task force members, department staff, and key partners, for example, we may request time on work session agendas to gather perspectives. For business and nonprofit stakeholders, individual phone calls or small group discussions would work well. • For identified stakeholders who are not "fixed in place," such as park users, teens, canoeists, cyclists, etc., short and friendly in- person intercept surveys are a great choice. • For all stakeholders, we will create and widely publicize online survey and input tools that include the same information and questions. • For issues from all stakeholders, we will compile, analyze, and share with the joint project team and key partners, and regularly publish summaries via agreed -upon core communications. page 6 1 City of Edina • 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan 3.0. Build Preliminary Scenarios and Gather Input Based on stakeholder input on the initial topics from the previous set of tasks, our integrated team will build a set of preliminary scenarios. These move the process more formally toward broad consensus. The preliminary scenarios will align with the agreed -upon topic areas, address identified stakeholder issues, and incorporate the complex interconnections between 54th Street, stormwater management and Minnehaha Creek, Living Streets and sustainability, policies, regulations, funding, and so on. 3.1. Define Key Components and Build Preliminary Scenarios • Constructed in modules to provide stakeholders with important P these may include, for example, the user or service needs it meets (sidewalks for ped access, bike lanes, traffic- calming measuring to preserve neighborhood feel, etc.), what problems it solves (filtration for water quality, etc.), order of magnitude construction costs, maintenance costs, Envision /Living Streets rating or score, and so on. • All will be enriched by our team's deep knowledge and innovative design, and this work will feed directly into both the refined scenarios and preliminary engineering tasks below. • Draft, pilot, and finalize preliminary scenarios. 3.2. Gather Stakeholder Input on Preliminary Scenarios G' h ' h d b b d d Lven t e objectives, t ese woul a community ase an in- person, likely a set of workshops or study sessions. We will promote them via lists from previous engagement and City, community, and partner media. Actual methods will be driven by the SEP, but below are realistic examples. • The structure would likely include a short informational presentation, process guidance (including Envision /Living Streets tools), and then facilitated roundtable discussions to review, explore, and discuss the preliminary scenarios • Some sessions may target general stakeholders; others may be hosted by the City, key partners like MCWD, or community groups such as business owners and developers, regulatory groups, ETC, EEC, Bike Edina Task Force, etc. ENVISION SUSTAINABILITY CREDIT RATING SYSTEM subcategory QLI.1 Improve community quality of life (T1.2 Stimulate sustainable growth and development UJ QL1.3 Develop local skills and capabilities _ COMMUNITY QL2.1 Enhance public health and safety QL2.2 Minimize noise and vibration 00.2.3 Minimize light pollution QL2.4 Improve community mobility and access QL2.5 Encourage alternative modes of transportation QL2.8 Improve site accessibility, safety and wayfindi ng C Preserve historic and cultural resources 203.2 _ Preserve views and local character QL3.3 Enhance public space QLO.D Innovate or exceed credit requirements . - LD1.1 Provide effective leadership and commitment LD1.2 Establish a sustainability management system LD1.3 Poster collaboration and teamwork _ LD1.4 Provide for stakeholder involvement 1D2.1 Pursue by- product synergy opportunities c LD2.2 Improve Infrastructure integration �� •. ,i,'.,,'. LD3.1 Plan for long -term monitoring and maintenance LD3.2 Address conflicting regulations and policies LD3.3 Extend useful life We will also create specific opportunities for City staff and elected officials to continue helping shape fully- informed and consensus -based outcomes. • Documentation would be done by table, possibly with some reporting out to the full group • For all sessions, compile, analyze, and share with the joint project team and key partners, and regularly publish a summary via the agreed -upon core communications methods. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page 7 4.0. Build Refined Scenarios and Gather Feedback I Select Preferred Alternative Working from the contributions and feedback from community stakeholders, City staff, commissioners, partners, and others, our integrated team will create a small set of refined scenarios to move the final step toward consensus. Following stakeholder feedback and final changes, this defines the contents of the Feasibility Study and Stormwater Management Plan. 4.1. Define Key Components and Build Refined Scenarios These will have the same core elements and content as the preliminary scenarios, but based on stakeholder and partner feedback some modules may be eliminated, others will have more detailed information, and they may be combined in new and innovative ways to better meet needs, priorities, and "thread the needle" with complex and conflicting priorities. 4.2. Gather Stakeholder Feedback on Refined Scenarios Anticipating the same objectives around consensus and working with established parameters, we would likely use a similar process as above, but this time to gather feedback on these more comprehensive and detailed scenarios. We will continue incorporating the Envision tool, Living Streets criteria, and all other parameters. Likely in the form of fewer but longer workshops or possibly charettes, we will ensure that critical stakeholders are actively involved. We will prepare detailed documentation, analyses, conclusions, and recommendations on both technical results and the pilot stakeholder engagement process. 4.3. Formally Select Preferred Alternative We will design and host a comprehensive workshop with our team, lead City staff, and likely MCWD to review and evaluate the results and resolve potential outstanding issues. Our key deliverable is an alternative that represents broad stakeholder consensus to reimagine and renew 54th Street's key transportation infrastructure, and the environmental infrastructure within Minnehaha Creek's subwatershed. 4.4. Share Preferred Alternative We will share preferred alternative with City departments heads, affected commissions, the Council, and the public. page 8 1 City of Edina • 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan 5.0. Translate Preferred Alternative to Feasibility Study for 54th Street and a Stormwater Management Plan for the Arden Park Area Each task described above addresses critical issues and builds stakeholder consensus to shape the primary technical deliverables — the Feasibility Study and SWMP. Conclusions and recommendations were noted above, and additional information will be included as appropriate in the Appendix. 5.1. Prepare Feasibility Study Deliver paper and electronic versions containing the following sections: Summary, location, initiation and issues, summary of this pilot stakeholder engagement effort and key results, existing conditions, proposed improvements, right of way and easements, projects costs, assessments, project schedule, feasibility, and appendix. The appendix will contain process and content information from this pilot stakeholder engagement effort, key sustainability measurements, study -level project design graphics, possible assessment roll, and other background data that were critical to the development of the study. 5.2. Prepare Stormwater Management Plan Deliver paper and electronic versions that report the goals and policies of the MCWD and the City of Edina, consensus -based preferred solutions to stormwater runoff in the Arden Park neighborhood, and requirements for rehabilitating 54th Street. The plan will also contain a narrative of the results, and methods of analysis used to arrive at those results, for the technical stormwater analysis /model assumptions written for the technical stakeholders like MCWD. The analysis will include the existing conditions and the scenarios of proposed stormwater management improvements developed in the previous tasks, all consistent with Living Streets principles, sustainability measurements, and stakeholder consensus. Preferred scenarios will include metrics such as, but not limited to, cost per pound of total phosphorus removed. Preparing the Feasibility Study and Stormwater Management Plan includes: • Gathering comments for draft documents, editing based on comments, and delivering final study and plan documents • One presentation to the City Council at the Public Improvement Hearing • One presentation to the transportation commission • Periodic working meetings with City and MCWD FEASIBILITY STUDY ;/ NORMANDALE NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Sherwood Avenue, Ryan Avenue, Parnell Avenue, West Store Drive, 65° Street. and 64" Street IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -194 November 14, 2012 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA Tow. q... o.. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. page 9 Work Plan /Timeline /Deliverables This table illustrates the work plan activities by discipline over time and calls out the key interim and final deliverables. - 0 111.1 1 0 1 .0 — SET PARAMETERS, WRITE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN —Set project parameters < 1.2 — Prepare stakeholder engagement plan r 1.3 — Collect and review existing data 2.0 —TELL THE STORY, GATHER ISSUES I I 2.1 — Tell the story 2.2 — Gather stakeholder issues on initial topics 3.0 — BUILD PRELIMINARY SCENARIOS AND GATHER INPUT 1 3.1 — Define key components and build preliminary scenarios 1 3.2 — Gather stakeholder input on preliminary scenarios r• 4.0 — BUILD REFINED SCENARIOS & GATHER FEEDBACK 4.1 — Define key components and build refined scenarios 42 — Gather stakeholder feedback on refined scenarios I I I 1 4.3 — Formally select preferred alternative 5.0 — TRANSLATE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE TO FEASIBILITY STUDY I 1 I I 5.1 —Prepare Feasibility Study i 5.2 — Prepare Stormwater Management Plan I I 1 Task Discipline Stakeholder Engagement Planning and Sustainability Engineering . r- Deliverables i I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I i I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I i I I 1 I 1 I I I I i I I I I Compile Input I I I on Preliminary I Scenarios 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 Preliminary 1 1 I Scenarios I I T_ _ _ i I —1 1 I Mail Initial I I I Communication i I 1 Engagement I 1 Stakeholder 1 I Plan i I Defined Project I Parameters Envision Rating System page 10 1 City of Edina • 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan _ �_ AUG SEP OCT $16,113 $12,182 $24,824 $19,941 1 I $16,862 .�r r1. $89,922 1 I Final Feasibility 1 Draft Feasibility Study /SWMP Total Cost A: 1 Preferred Study /SWMP with this Pr( 1 Alternative Refined Scenarios ;sociated iposal Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page I I Background /Experience - Team Overview Established in 1927, SEH is a multidiscipline firm of engineers, architects, planners, and scientists known for our comprehensive technical capabilities and superior client service, which contribute to Building a Better World for All of UsTm. To respond to your project needs, SEH has teamed with Carroll, Franck & Associates which specializes in designing and delivering authentic and transparent public engagement processes, and particularly in bringing underrepresented and unheard voices to the table. Areas of extensive work include challenging public policy issues, multi- stakeholder environments, innovative engagement techniques, and community-based consensus building. Our combined skills brings to the City of Edina a seasoned team of public engagement specialists; street reconstruction and stormwater engineers; sustainability and Envision experts, landscape architects, and park planners; and multimodal transportation (Living Streets), traffic, and structural engineers. We have assembled this team to address all of the City of Edina's needs as you look to solicit input and build consensus for this important and highly visible project. Representative Project Experience Lake Harriet Stakeholder Engagement — Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board — Minneapolis, Minn. Carroll Franck & Associates designed and implemented a robust and practical public engagement process, technical analysis, and prepared recommendations to the Park Board on capital improvements around Lake Harriet. We successfully engaged and gathered input from 1,200+ stakeholders through intercept surveys, online surveys, interviews, focus groups, community meetings, and workshops. The project included combining stakeholder input with complex technical, design, and financial issues to reach consensus on an innovative, defensible, and sustainable solution. Envision Sustainability Rating System — Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD), Milwaukee, Wis. 1 In 2012, SEH was hired by the MMSD to develop a report using ENVISION to help evaluate three flood management alternatives as a component of the Lyons Park Creek Flood Management Planning Project. A secondary objective of the report was to help advance the practice of applying triple bottom line decision making to MMSD projects by applying two different sustainability rating systems to the project. Country Club Area Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction Project — City of Edina, Minn. SEH reconstructed the streets and public utilities along a 4.8 mile corridor that service 557 single family homes. A significant part of this project included addressing stakeholders concerns about perceived cut - through vehicle traffic in the northeast part of Edina. SEH worked with stakeholders in Edina (including its Heritage Preservation and Traffic Commissions) and from the adjoining Cities of Saint Louis Park and Minneapolis. We assisted with several stakeholder meetings including mock ups of proposed speed bumps and traffic signs to help assure stakeholder needs were adequately addressed. page 12 1 City of Edina • 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan .._. �_`- r •. ¢UAUTYt7FLipL a Country Club Area Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction Project — City of Edina, Minn. SEH reconstructed the streets and public utilities along a 4.8 mile corridor that service 557 single family homes. A significant part of this project included addressing stakeholders concerns about perceived cut - through vehicle traffic in the northeast part of Edina. SEH worked with stakeholders in Edina (including its Heritage Preservation and Traffic Commissions) and from the adjoining Cities of Saint Louis Park and Minneapolis. We assisted with several stakeholder meetings including mock ups of proposed speed bumps and traffic signs to help assure stakeholder needs were adequately addressed. page 12 1 City of Edina • 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan Snelling Avenue Living Streets — City of St. Paul, Minn. SEH's plan for multimodal transportation options and opportunities to incorporate green design on Snelling Avenue demonstrates the team's strong understanding of multimodal, Living Streets principles and how they are successfully incorporated into community outreach efforts which is directly applicable to the preliminary design of West 54th Street. Snelling Avenue is a state trunk highway that travels through urban neighborhoods with a diverse set of user groups and competing needs. SEH led a comprehensive stakeholder engagement process to involve agency, advocate, resident, and community partners in the development of concept alternatives. The rigorous stakeholder involvement process led to widespread acceptance of the plan which includes contextually appropriate multimodal treatments. Minnehaha— Hiawatha Corridor, Infrastructure Planning — Hennepin County, Minn. Carroll, Franck & Associates designed and led the implementation of all public participation for this collaborative corridor planning effort. Community issues and priorities drove the framework and will yield millions in county, city, and other public /private infrastructure investments in this aged industrial corridor. The framework also incorporated existing plans and extensive new research and analysis. Successfully reached out to underrepresented stakeholders and also facilitated community and technical committees that wove together key issues, goals and strategies, and information into a viable framework. Engagement included stakeholder identification and analysis, in- person input at community events and festivals, intercept surveys, door knocking, community meetings, presentations, informational materials, and audio /video input. Surface Water Plan Update — City of Chanhassen, Minn. For the City of Chanhassen, SEH has provided numerous and ongoing surface water and drainage- erlated services. Our work on the Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) Update included Task Force meetings to guide plan development of the overriding goals, policies and development standards. We collected GPS and total station survey data of inverts and locations of more than 6,000 stormwater system structures and completed MnRAMs of more than 385 wetlands. From these field collected data we created function GIS mapping tools of the storm systems and more than 450 wetland, pond, stream corridor and lake features. One of the key efforts of the plan update was to update the data quality and modeling results of the citywide HydroCAD model. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page t 3 Lakes /Lyndale Connectivity Plan - City of Richfield SEH used a multifaceted approach to develop a Connectivity Plan for the Lakes at Lyndale District of Richfield. The core of the approach utilized three primary activities: site and existing conditions analysis; incorporation of previous plans; and the development of concepts and recommendations addressing existing gaps through retrofit solutions for the built environment. Working with City Planning staff, internal City stakeholders and citizen stakeholders we established evaluation/ ranking criteria and vetted concepts which enhance connectivity for pedestrians and bicyclists throughout the district and provides a strong interrelationship with the street and transit system. TH 41 EIS Consensus Building - MnDOT Carroll, Franck & Associates worked closely with 12 key stakeholder agencies to reach consensus on a highly- contentious Minnesota River crossing as part of a Tier I EIS: FHWA and USFWS /Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge; MnDOT, DNR, SHPO; Metropolitan Council; Cities of Chaska, Shakopee, Carver, and Chanhassen; and Scott and Carver Counties. Critical issues included: environmental justice; Section 4(f) for protected lands and historic properties; noise and visual impacts; public safety; ecosystem and refuge user impacts; and others; exploring corridor options and impacts, developing common goals and strategies to address impacts for all key stakeholders, identifying innovative mitigation, and creating a sustainable structure for ongoing engagement over the next 20 years. � , 1 Stormwater Management Plan - City of Long Lake SEH assisted the City of Long Lake with the stormwater planning and feasibility analysis for their proposed downtown redevelopment. As part of the project, SEH evaluated the existing natural resources in the ravine /drainage system and ponds; identified water quality treatment needs to accommodate the redevelopment water quality plan, and prepared conceptual designs and cost estimates for stream stabilization restoration work and pond system expansion or enhancement. The water quality improvements were a key element in the City of Long Lake's recent selection for an LCDA grant for the downtown project. The project included an innovative subsurface gravel wetland system that will remove an estimated 10 pounds of phosphorus from entering Long Lake on an annual basis. page 14 1 City of Edina - 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan Background Experience — Discipline Leaders STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Anne Carroll, M.P. it PLAN NINGISUSTAINABILITY Andrew Dane, AICP, ENV SP IL 'I. a ENGINEERING Paul Pasko III, PE Project Manager t IY �� Ron Leaf, PE Water Resources r Heather Kienitz, PE Living Streets Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page 15 Anne R. Carroll, M.P. Since 1985, Carroll, Franck & Associates (CF &A), has provided inclusive stakeholder engagement and strategic planning consulting, professional development training, and graduate -level teaching to public and nonprofit organizations. We specialize in designing and delivering authentic and transparent public engagement processes, civil discourse, and consensus building. Areas of extensive work include challenging public policy issues, complex multi- stakeholder environments, infrastructure and planning topics, and creative engagement techniques. CF &A has successfully engaged the full spectrum of stakeholders through projects with the following organizations: • Hennepin County Housing, Community Works, and Transit — Minnehaha- Hiawatha Corridor • Minnesota Department of Transportation — TH 41 Tier 1 EIS • Minnesota Departments of Education and Human Services — Early Childhood Standards and Indicators (Statewide) • Minneapolis Department of Public Works — Minneapolis Bicycle Master Plan • Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board — Southwest LRT DEIS Community Advisory Committee; Lake Harriet Infrastructure Community Advisory Committee • Hennepin County Office to End Homelessness and County Human Services and Public Health: Hennepin County Continuum of Care (annual) "The stakeholder engagement process...was one of the most robust and comprehensive ever conducted on a project of this type — we heard directly from over 1,200 people through intercept surveys.... One of our early goals was to produce defensible, supportable, and sustainable recommendations that could stand on their own merits. We feel we have more than met that goal. Our extensive community engagement injected that critically important human element, which directly shaped our thinking and ensures that our recommendations will resonate with the local community, park visitors, and the MPRB. " Matt Perry, Minneapolis Parks and Recreation CAC Chair "I was told you are the best in the business, and they were right" -- Don Pflaum, City of Minneapolis Bicycle Master Plan Project Manager" Matt Perry, CAC Chair Andrew F. Dane, AICP, ENV SP I Senior Community Development and Sustainability Specialist /Envision Andrew Dane is a Community Development and Sustainability Specialist who brings 17 years of successful sustainable development experience working with municipalities, private businesses, tribes, and 1� %2M non - profits. He is a highly skilled and confident group process leader and facilitator, with extensive experience designing and leading public participation and community engagement processes. Andrew specializes in planning and public participation to support downtown and neighborhood revitalization, community planning, and economic development efforts. Project experience includes: • Sustainable Communities Public Policy Forum — State of Wisconsin • Lyons Park Creek ENVISION Evaluation, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District — Milwaukee, Wis. • Barron County Comprehensive Plan — Barron, Wis. • Market Analysis & Downtown Strategy — Sherwood, Wis. • Downtown Porter Master Plan — Porter, Ind. page 16 1 City of Edina • 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan Paul J. Pasko III, PE I Project Manager /Principal Paul is a Project Manager with 28 years of experience in a wide variety of municipal, transportation, 3` trail, storm water runoff, and utility engineering projects. While Paul's responsibilities range from } project inception to completion; his primary responsibility is public engagement. He has engaged the public in every way from simple `one on one' in- person conversations with stakeholders to appearances on the Discovery Channel. Paul will use his engagement experience to assure this team remains committed to its approach that comprehensively integrates the disciplines of engineering, stakeholder engagement, and planning and sustainability. • West 77th Street Reconstruction between Trunk Highway 100 and Metro Boulevard — Edina, Minn. • Country Club / Sunnyslope Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation — Edina, Minn. • 66th Street Sidewalk Improvements — Edina, Minn. • Country Club Area Sewer, Water Main, and Street Reconstruction — Edina, Minn. • Ridge Road Street and Utility Reconstruction - Edina, Minn • Gallagher Drive / Nine Mile Creek Regional Bike Trail Improvements — Edina, Minn. and Three Rivers Park District • Reconstruction of Valley View Road — Eden Prairie, Minn. Ronald B. Leaf, PE I Principal /Senior Water Resources Engineer Ron Leaf is responsible for managing a variety of water resources projects and has extensive experience with comprehensive surface water management planning, flood studies and mapping, storm water ordinances, NPDES permitting and storm water low - impact development practices. Ron previously worked for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and was responsible for coordinating revisions to the state's water quality rules, providing legislative testimony on implementation of water quality programs, and developing engineering standards for storage structures and treatment systems. In recent years, he has managed six area wide storm water master planning projects that have involved significant stakeholder involvement, coordination with the local watershed organization and development of a multi -year implementation program to meet or exceed regulatory requirements and project specific goals. • Walker -Lake Area Stormwater Master Plan, (Coordination with MCWD), City of St. Louis Park, Minn. • Downtown Area Stormwater Master Plan (Coordination with MCWD), City of Long Lake Minn. • Blake Road /Cottageville Park Concept Plan (Coordination with MCWD), City of Hopkins, Minn. • Surface Water Management Plan Update — Chanhassen, Minn. • Second Generation Water Resources Management Plan — Burnsville, Minn. • Surface Water Management Plan Update — Shoreview, Minn. Heather N. Kienitz, PE I Living Streets /Multi -Modal Transportation Engineer Heather Kienitz is a Multi -Modal Transportation Engineer with 15 years of experience developing context sensitive solutions that balance the needs of all roadway users. She has experience planning and designing retrofit solutions to provide facilities for non - motorized users within the built environment as well as reconstruction projects. She led the preliminary and final design through construction of over 26 miles of retrofit bicycle facilities in Minneapolis and led the traffic task for the Multimodal Plan for Snelling Avenue in St. Paul. Heather routinely conducts work with agency and community stakeholders to develop Complete Streets transportation solutions. • Snelling Avenue Multimodal Transportation Plan (MnDOT) — St. Paul, Minn. • Non - Motorized Transportation Pilot Program Bicycle Operations — Minneapolis, Minn. • Lakes at Lyndale Connectivity Urban Design Plan — Richfield Minn. • West 106th Street Multimodal Traffic Study — Bloomington, Minn. • Linden Hills Small Area Plan — Minneapolis, Minn. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page 17 Background Experience — Discipline Support Veronica Anderson, AICP, ASLA I Senior Urban Designer /Planner Veronica Anderson is a Designer /Planner and Project Manager with more than 17 years of experience working on public planning and design projects. As an Urban Planner, Veronica has focused on community and park system planning, land use planning and commercial and neighborhood redevelopment. As an Urban Designer, Veronica has focused on site planning, '44 creative storm water management and traffic calming projects incorporating both hardscape and native vegetation treatments. Veronica is also an experienced group facilitator who believes in the necessity of early and on -going public participation during the planning and design process to achieve informed consent among the stakeholders. • Southdale /Woodhill Neighborhood Street Improvements — City of Edina, Minn. • Counry Club Area Sewer, Water Main, and Street Reconstruction — City of Edina, Minn. • Ridge Road Reconstruction — City of Edina, Minn. • West 70th Street — City of Edina, Minn. • Rice Creek Parkway — City of Shoreview, Minn. • Maplewood Nature Preserve — City of Maplewood, Minn. • Park System Plan — City of Golden Valley Minn. 11A, Toby Muse, PE I Municipal Engineer Toby is experienced in a variety of municipal engineering projects from feasibility stage to final construction and project closeout. Types of projects include existing road, trail and parking lot rehabilitation, storm water detention and conveyance systems, sanitary sewer systems, water distribution systems, lighting and traffic signal systems. Responsible for feasibility development, preliminary and final design, cost estimating, preparation of plans and specifications, and construction observation. • Gallagher Drive /Nine Mile Creek Regional Bike Trail Improvements — City of Edina, Minn. and Three Rivers Park District • Richmond Hills Neighborhood Roadway and Utility Improvements — City of Edina, Minn. • Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway and Utility Improvements — City of Edina, Minn. • Country Club Area Sewer, Water Main, and Street Reconstruction — City of Edina, Minn. • Southdale / Woodhill Neighborhood Street Reconstruction — City of Edina, Minn. • Nine Mile Village Water Line Rehabilitation — City of Edina, Minn. page 18 1 City of Edina • 54th Street and Arden Park Area Stormwater Management Plan Jeff A. Johnson, PE I Structural Engineer Jeff Johnson is a Structural Project Manager /Design Engineer with more than 30 years experience in project management, design, renovation and construction observation of a variety of bridge and hydraulic structures. Jeff's experience includes design of more than 400 state, county and local bridges utilizing steel beam, prestressed girder, continuous structural concrete slab, rehabilitation of stone arches and timber structures. Projects include: Ridge Road Reconstruction — City of Edina, Minn. • Country Club Area Sewer, Water Main, and Street Reconstruction — City of Edina, Minn. • Minnehaha Woods Neighorhood Street and Utility Improvements — City of Edina, Minn. • Bryant Avenue Pedestrian Bridge Rehabilitation Over Minnehaha Creek — Minneapolis, Minn. • CSAH 35 over Maple Creek (West Bridge), Owatonna — Steele County, Minn. • CSAH 64 over Browns Creek — Washington County, Minn. • Third Street Stone Arch Bridge Rehabilitation over Miller Creek — Duluth, Minn. • Rock Island Swing Bridge Rehabilitation over the Mississippi River — Inver Grove Heights, Minn. Michael E. Kotila, PE I Senior Transportation Engineer Mike Kotila is a Professional Engineer with more than 25 years of traffic and transportation engineering experience. Mike's project experience includes traffic data collection and analysis, traffic calming studies and forecasting, safe routes to school, transportation system plans, Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) studies, roundabouts, traffic modeling, geometric design, signal and lighting design, ITS applications, construction staging, detouring, traffic signing and striping design. • Southdale /Woodhill Neighborhood Street Improvements — City of Edina, Minn. • Country Club Area Sewer, Water Main, and Street Reconstruction — City of Edina, Minn. Ridge Road Reconstruction — City of Edina, Minn. • Gallagher Drive /Nine Mile Creek Regional Bike Trail Improvements — City of Edina, Minn. and Three Rivers Park District • Franklin Avenue (CSAH 5) and East River Parkway Preliminary Design — Minneapolis, Minn. • TH 169 at Bren Road /Londonderry and Excelsior Boulevard — Edina, Minnetonka, and Hopkins Minn. • West 76th Street /Penn Avenue — Richfield, Minn. • Brooklyn Boulevard (CSAH 152) Reconstruction — Brooklyn Center, Minn. • Midtown Exchange Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan — Minneapolis, Minn. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I page 19 A SEH Detailed Cost Breakdown City ofEdlna Public Engagement cord Prelir»iiiaty Engineering Services for 5416 Streef and Arden Park Area Stornrmvater Alanageuzent Plan May 14, 2013 ® � mo ®oo ©000mom�� � m•mmm ®am��mo�a� ■ ©0e ©e ©��ee� ©� � • � • ®am ®moo��mo�o� 0m ® ®000��m��o�.-�■■. NOTES (I) Total etimmed cnn for mlumm I. • 6. is 364,922. Columm I. - 6. do nm melude public cngogemcnl cosec Public engagemcm costa em 525,000. Thc total cost mocimed wish Nis pmposal is 564,921 +3 2S,ODO - 539,922. (2) Include om (I) workshop mining to discm stakeholdn mmmimicalimu ()) Include thine (3) svodshops n study sessions m difcuss preliminary seerurim (u) Include PW (2) workshops or chamnes to discuss refined scenmin ( 5) Includesdevelupmentoflhree(3)mf edsmnmio: (6) Includes presming do dmfl and final f 3iliry study m one (1) Edim TmnspmL lio,Clm Wi mecung and ene (I) Public Impmmncnl Hering (]) Include presemi a the Arden Park Area Sormwmer Mmogcment Plm of ox l l) Minrchaha Creek Wotershed Dislrim Bamd rncaing (3) If odditionl meetings om required beyond dose outlined above, mr rate pn meeting is i]_,200 Pape 2 0l2 41. 44 -11b 4_ Wooddale Pave IL 44 ir Ln V)t ', • _d • •_ `_';��� �..� � __ a�.�.,• - �.. ,,, 1"� T - - � -4�.- , � ;, ` •• '' , I, - I cal; AN N7, P6 R'Lz i tft-, rand ue !4;t f o00 Building a Better World for All of Us'" sehinc.com .A To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: June 4, 2013 Subject: 2013 Sidewalk Projects Prioritization List o e • ,MCuRPOi .-I lHBH Agenda Item M. IV. H. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Authorize staff to perform a public process with the neighborhood and develop plans and specifications and take bids for the School Road sidewalk. And also authorize staff to further study the Interlachen Blvd, Xerxes Ave, and West Shore Dr & Cornelia Ave sidewalks. Information / Background: Staff presented the following sidewalks to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) at their May 16 meeting, see attached ETC report: • School Rd — from Normandale Rd to School Rd along 60th St W, along School Rd from 60th St W to Concord Ave; $310,000. • 42nd St W — from Oakdale Ave to France Ave; $440,000. • W Normandale Frontage Rd — from Benton Ave south to Clover Ridge; $190,000. • Xerxes Ave — from 60th St W to 56th St W; $480,000. • Interlachen Blvd — from Mirror Lakes Dr to Vernon Ave; $700,000. • E Normandale Rd - from 70th to 66th; unknown cost • Cornelia Ave / West Shore Dr / Dunburry Ln — between 70th St W and 66th St W.; $480,000 Staff requested that the ETC prioritize the projects with the understanding that at a minimum, one project would be constructed in 2013. After much discussion, the ETC recommended that the City Council pursue the School Road, Interlachen Blvd, Xerxes Ave, and West Shore Dr & Cornelia Ave sidewalks in no particular order. Staff is recommending that the City Council pursue the School Rd sidewalk for construction in 2013 and then study which other sidewalks or portions of sidewalks can be also be constructed within the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety fund budget. Attachments: • May 16 ETC Staff Report for Prioritization of Sidewalk Projects • May 16 ETC Draft Minutes GAI'MINFRAMSTREETS DIVISIDEWALKS N BIKEWAYS \Future Sidewalk Plans\Item IV. H. 2013 Sidewalk Projects Prioritization Llst.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: May 16, 2013 Subject: Prioritization of Sidewalk Projects 9111 � A O e Cn • ,y��ORi'ORi''<<'p � 1898 Agenda Item #: VI. A. Action. Discussion Information ❑ Action Requested: Review and recommend to the City Council a priority list of sidewalks, including which sidewalk should be constructed in 2013. Information / Background: The new Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund will have approximately $400,000 for sidewalk or bike facilities in 2013. At the April 18 ETC meeting, I introduced seven sidewalk projects that staff is currently preparing feasibility studies. We have not identified which project should be constructed first. In the future, we will be able to rely on an updated sidewalk plan and policy along with the Living Streets Implementation plan. Staff is suggesting using the following guidance to prioritize the construction of these projects: I. Sidewalks in road reconstruction project areas. 2. Sidewalks abutting significant private development that can be funded (in whole or part) by the private developer. 3. Sidewalks on streets with demonstrated safety issues for pedestrians. 4. Sidewalks that abut a public school, public building, community playfield, or neighborhood park. 5. Sidewalks on identified active routes to schools, parks, or commercial destinations or on transit routes. 6. Missing segments of sidewalk along minor arterials. 7. Missing segments of sidewalk along collectors (one side minimum). 8. Sidewalks funded in whole or in part by grants or other agencies. The first four projects listed below have draft feasibility studies (attached). The next project has been estimated but a draft feasibility study has not been done. The last two projects do not have estimates or draft feasibility studies yet. e School Rd — from Normandale Rd to School Rd along 60th St W, along School Rd from 60th St W to Concord Ave; $310,000. • 42nd St W — from Oakdale Ave to France Ave; $440,000. • W Normandale Frontage Rd — from Benton Ave south to Clover Ridge; $190,000. • Xerxes Ave — from 60th St W to 56th St W; $480,000. • Interlachen Blvd — from Mirror Lakes Dr to Vernon Ave; $700,000. • E Normandale Rd - from 70th to 66th. • Cornelia Ave / West Shore Dr / Dunburry Ln — between 70th St W and 66th St W. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Below is a table that could be utilized to prioritize the sidewalk projects. Page 2 Priority PROJECT o-vC ; 'a > s of C o0C Ad O 4J to � Q V, (d td bo C Ttl d T V Z N X Z >;LL H W Sidewalks in road reconstruction project x - 2014 areas. (easterly portion) 2 Sidewalks abutting significant private development and which can be funded (in whole or part) by,the private developer. 3 Sidewalks on streets with demonstrated safety issues for pedestrians. ? ? ? 4 Sidewalks that abut a public school, public building, community playfield, or x x x neighborhood park. 5 Sidewalks on identified active routes to schools, parks, or commercial x x x x destinations or on transit routes. 6 Missing segments of sidewalk along minor arterials. 7 Missing segments of sidewalk along collectors (one side minimum). x x 8 Sidewalks funded in whole or in part by grants or other agencies. Staff is requesting that the ETC prioritize the above projects. The list will then be submitted to the City Council. Once the City Council makes a decision regarding which project to move forward with, staff will begin the public engagement process for the project to be constructed this summer. The Xerxes Ave project is,the only project that has had public engagement to date. Attachments: Feasibility Studies for School Rd, 42nd St W, W Normandale Rd, and Xerxes Ave Sidewalk Projects. GABiylneering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Agendas & RR's \2013 R&R \20130516 \Item VI.A. Prioritization of Sidewalk Proiects.dom MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM MAY 16, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Sierks, Spanhake and Whited. f APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Bass to approve the meeting agenda. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 25, 2013 The following corrections were made: page 4, paragraph 1, "...Expect bid delay..." change to "...Expect big delay...," "...related to their..." change to "...related to the City's..: Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Braden to approve the revised minutes of April 25, 2013. Ayes: Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, LaForce, Nelson, Spanhake, Whited Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Prioritization of Sidewalk Projects Director Houle said there are seven sidewalk projects that were either petitioned by residents or were requested by. City Council and with the PACS.fund now.iri place, he asked that the ETC prioritize the sidewalks acid recommend to the City Council which 'one(s) should be built in 2013. He suggested eight principles that could be used in prioritizing the sidewalks and said in the future, they would rely on an updated sidewalk plan and policy as well as the Living Streets Implementation Plan. He said staff has already completed draft feasibility studies and estimates for some of the sidewalks. The seven sidewalks are: 1. School Rd — from Normandale Rd to School Rd along 60th St W, along School Rd from 60th St W to Concord Ave ($310,000) 2. 42nd St W — from Oakdale Ave to France Ave ($440,000) 3. W. Normandale Frontage Rd —from Benton Ave south to Clover Ridge ($190,000) 4. Xerxes Ave — from 60th St w to 56th St W ($480,000) 5. Interlachen Blvd — from Mirror Lakes Dr to Vernon Ave ($700,000) 6. E. Normandale Rd —from 70th St W to 66th St W (feasibility study not completed) 7. Cornelia Ave / West Shore Dr / Dunberry La — between 70th St and 66th St W (feasibility study not completed) Discussion included: How to evaluate principle #3 "sidewalk on streets with demonstrated safety issues for pedestrians;" no evaluation is in place yet; "demonstrated" was used to differentiate between perception; 2 perception must be considered if the goal is to shift mode; general engineering evaluation practice is to separate pedestrians and vehicles when there are 500 -750 cars per day. • How to advocate for a street like Interlachen Blvd with few properties. • The seven sidewalks are in order of how they should be built based on safety, opportunity, etc. • Areas with a safety issue should be a priority, followed by school zones. • Should sidewalks be built based on demands or what is right for Edina? • Start with a map of existing sidewalks to equitably fill in all quadrants. • PACS fund for the first year is not for a full year and it will also fund the transportation planner's salary and the Wooddale Ave restriping project. • Community input is important. • Money is available to build at least two sidewalks in 2013 and selecting two is the goal; a transportation planner will soon be hired to help them define principles and the Living Streets Policy. • Can we build in phases to get as much done as possible? • Walk /bike to school just took place recently4nd students from Cornelia Elementary could not participate because there are no safe routes. Motion was made by member LaForce to recommend School..Road, Xerxes Avenue, and Interlachen Blvd, in no particular order, pending funding discussion by staff With,City Manager. The motion was seconded by member Janovy. After discussion, the motion was amended to include West Shore /Cornelia. All voted aye. Motion carried. Motion was made by member LaForce to recommend-connecting the cul -de -sac at 59th St W to Normandale Rd going towards Benton Ave and the motion was seconded by member Whited. All voted aye. Motion carried. Hazelton Road Improvements Director Houle said staff and B:yerl,y's have been working with Hennepin County since last year to get approval for a right -in /right -out onto France Ave. Hennepin County have agreed to this and will be providing a letter of support. Hennepin County required that the access from 72nd St W to France Ave be reduced to a three - quarter access to prevent vehicles from exiting Byerly's site and travel across France Ave to 72 "d St W. Additionally, they also asked for enhancement to the two accesses east of Byerly's on Hazelton Rd. Mr. Andrew Plowman with WSB explained that the project will include one lane in each direction, landscaped medians, % access at west entrance, a modified elliptical shape roundabout at east entrance with adequate movement for fire trucks, and right -in /right -out at Byerly's west entrance. At the Rue De France west entrance, an island will be added to eliminate left turns, and the Szechuan Star driveway will be relocated but location is still to be determined. Director Houle said the cost split will be 1/3 City and 2/3 Byerly's. An open house is scheduled for May 28, 5 -6 p.m. to share the proposal with the public and on June 4, the City Council will hold a public hearing for the roadway improvements at the same time they consider final approval for the Byerly's redevelopment. 2 Discussion included: • Liked the plan. • Senses that they are creating more driving thru and parking lots ( Byerly's and Macy's has a cross easement that allows Byerly's traffic to drive across Macy's parking lot to Gallagher Dr.) • Now that neighborhoods are defined we should start using this to define notices and mailing area (open house /public hearing notices were mailed to everyone within 1,000 ft. of the project.) • It was noted that the communications committee was to review the communications plan that is in place. Traffic Safety Committee Report of May 1, 2013 Regarding Section A, member La Force asked if staff was reconimending an exception and Director Houle said no. He said it is an offset intersection. Motion was made by member lyer and seconded by member LaForce to forward the Traffic Safety C.omiro «ee Report of May 1 Lo 16h...,�, .,V;:nc:l. All voted aye• My +:o^ carried. Living Streets Policy Update Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager, presented the presentation that she will be giving to boards, commissions and staff about the Living Streets Policy. The Living Streets Policy was developed by the ETC. It will be presented to City Council on July 16 in a work session. Member Bass recommended doing a presentation to the two.watershed districts because in Maplewood, their watershed district was very supportive and even provided a grant. Ms. Kurt said the plan is to form an advisory committee (including the transportation planner) and begin meeting in July to finalize the policy. Member Whited volunteered to serve on the committee. Discussion 'included: • Are we benchmarking to'-other communities? Not at this time because there really isn't any to benchmark to. There is software that rates infrastructure but it is heavy on the transportation side but falls short on the 'green' side. • Trees do not play a prominent role in this policy — Maplewood included ash trees when they did reconstruction projects. The Energy & Environment Commission (EEC) might want to comment on this. • Make transportation and 'green' equitable in the policy. • BARR had good visuals that would help with presentation to the community. • Can add another principle on landscaping and trees but do not want to slow down the process. a Keep going and ask the EEC to help in this area. • Are costs increasing and Living Streets will help to reduce costs? It is more about having data in one place to serve competing interests. • It is transportation- heavy, are we missing benchmarks that other boards and commission could relate to? Updates Student Members Member Schweiger said he will be biking more this summer after seeing the rise in gas price! Member Sierks said she will be reapplying to serve on the ETC and asked for everyone's support. Bike Edina Task Force Received minutes of April 11, 2013. Member Janovy said the Police are focusing on bike safety and that there is a need for bike education. Living Streets Working Group — None F Transportation Options Working Group Member Whited said she met with Manager Neal to clarify that it was her company, PRISM, that would be getting the money and not her. Member Janovy said the'ETC knew member Whited's association with PRISM when they made the recommendation and chair "Nelson added that they did look at other options and decided to go with PRISM. Member Whited said her company applied for a Freedom Funds grant for a new vehicle (for this operation) and they've made it through the first round. Communications Committee - Done Member Bass asked if the City Council received their communications recommendation and Director Houle said they did but they did not offer any comments. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues - None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Bass said she attended a Living Streets workshop sponsored by Allianz for Sustainability at the League of. nnesota Cities and shared what the.ETC have done so far, how they've generated support and how do.Town helped to facilitate community engagement around Living Streets. She said one difference is that the ETC's policy was generated out of a transportation group while others are generated from environmental groups with a real focus on green elements. She said everyone is struggling with how to do community engagement. Member Bass said MnDOT has released solicitation for Safe Routes to School funds. She said the infrastructure is predictable (mostly sidewalks) but most of the non - infrastructure grants are to school districts or other public institutions for hiring Safe Routes coordinator to implement education and enforcement activities. Additionally, school districts are purchasing bike fleets and offering education and maintenance to students and staff. Member Bass shared this as ideas for funding and implementation in Edina. Chair Nelson said the Grandview Area redevelopment is starting up again and they are looking for a representative from the ETC. Member Janovy volunteered. rd 0 STAFF COMMENTS • A work session with the ETC and City Council is scheduled for July 16. • The next France Ave Urban Design meeting will be June 6 or 17, 7 p.m. at the Public Works and Park Maintenance facility. An email will be sent to confirm the date. • 2014 Reconstruction Projects — an open house was held last year; surveyors are currently working the areas; next month the ETC will receive information for review and feedback. • The Wooddale Restriping Request for Purchase is going to City Council on May 21 for approval. • The Lake Edina Pathway was approved by City Council. Engineering is designing the path and Public Works will build it. Staff will take into consideration concern of golf balls being hit towards the path when deciding how high to build the fence. • 54th St W and bridge improvements are scheduled for 2014 and staff is reviewing four proposals to select a consultant for the project. Park Maintenance, Public Works, Economic Development and Engineering are reviewing the proposals. Public engagement is a key component in the proposal. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE NAME TERM J. F,, M. A. M J J A S O N D Work Session # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1'_ 1 1 1 5 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1. 4 80% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 4 80% Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 80% I er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 4 80% Janov , Jennifer 2/1 /2014 1. 1 `1 1 1 5 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 10001. Schwei er, Steven student 1 1 1 3 60% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 1 4 80% S anhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 2 40% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 100% 5 To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #:IV.I The Recommended Bid is From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works $�Q ®. Within Budget Not Within Budget Date: 6/04/13 Subject: Request For Purchase — 2013 -2014 Salt Purchase Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration: Date: State Contract 12/31/2013 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Cargill, Inc. — Regular Road Salt $60.45 per ton (State Contract 62341) Cargill, Inc. — Treated Road Salt $73.48 per ton (State Contract 62349) Recommended Quote or Bid: Cargill, Inc. State contracts General Information: This is the annual purchase for road salt used for snow and ice control. The City purchases Salt from the State of Minnesota Contract and will purchase approximately 2400 tons of regular salt and 600 tons of treated salt for the 2013 — 2014 winter season, depending on winter conditions. The treated 'salt is used during the very cold events and has a lower operating temperature. These costs are just over 2% higher than the 2012 -2013 salt costs. This purchase is funded through the Public Works snow and ice control operating budget. City of Edina = 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 �. 1 Agenda Item V. A. A �1 e r�CORPORP'��9 • iaaa RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE' JAMES VAN VALKENBURG WHEREAS, James Van Valkenburg passed away suddenly on Saturday, May 25, 2013; and WHEREAS, James Van Valkenburg served as a member of the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals " from 1966 to 1973; and WHEREAS, James Van Valkenburg served as an Village Trustee for Edina from 1960 to 1974; and WHEREAS, James Van Valkenburg served as the first Mayor of the City of Edina from 1975 to 1980; and WHEREAS, James Van Valkenburg was a Charter Board Member of the Edina Community Foundation in 1977; serving as president and treasurer during his tenure; and WHEREAS, James Van Valkenburg was a 40 -year leader of the Edina Crime Prevention Fund; and WHEREAS, James Van Valkenburg was appointed to the Edina Art Center Board in 1982, serving for 27 years, chairing the Board in 2009; and WHEREAS, James Van Valkenburg served with great conviction, enthusiasm and honor, often communicating through letters with his,many colleagues. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby,extends its heartfelt sympathy to James .Van Valkenburg's family members in their loss,. recognizing further that his death is a distinct loss to the City in which he lived, served and won deep affection and respect. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 4, 2013. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Agenda Item B. tees RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE MARCELLA DAEHN WHEREAS, Marcella Daehn passed away following an illness on Saturday, May.25, 2013; and WHEREAS, Marcella Daehn served as the City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota beginning in 1977 until her retirement in April of 1995; and WHEREAS, as City Clerk, Marcella was responsible for the administration of all city business .licenses, the conduct of elections, preparation of City Council materials including minutes and packets, the codification of ordinances and all legal notices for the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, during her tenure with the City of Edina, Ms. Daehn performed all duties in an exemplary manner and was a valued member of the City staff, and WHEREAS, she was a.trustworthy, energetic and outgoing employee with a genuine heart for service to Edina's citizens and her fellow employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby extends its heartfelt sympathy to Marcella Daehn's family members in their loss. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 4, 2013. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor owed ORPo 1888 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.A From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑x Discussion Date: June 4, 2013 Information = Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Fairview Southdale Hospital — Site Plan Review with drive aisle setback and parking space Variances, 6401 France Avenue; Resolution No. 2013 -46. Action Requested: Approve the attached Resolution, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Information /Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision — August 20, 2013) Fairview Southdale Hospital is proposing to build a two -level 88,974 square foot addition for a new Emergency Care and Urgent Care Center at their site at 6401 France Avenue. The existing Emergency and Urgent Care facility would be remodeled for hospital use. To accommodate the. proposed addition, the following is requested: ➢ Site Plan Review. ➢ Drive -aisle setback from 20 -feet to 6 -10 feet for the new round -a -bout drop off and pick up area and drive aisle in front of the addition adjacent to Crosstown Highway. ➢ Parking Stall Variance from 2,728 to 2,051 spaces. Planning Commission Recommendation: On May 22, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Site Plan and Variances subject to the findings and conditions in the Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Commission suggested that the applicant further examine the landscaping at the end of the round -a -bout and consider a greater buffer to screen vehicle headlights. The applicant has submitted a revised landscape plan to provide that screening. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2013 -46 • Revised Landscape Plans date stamped May 29, 2013 • Letter from MnDot dated May 20, 2013 • Draft minutes from the May 22, 2013, Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, May 22, 2013 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501 St. • Edina, MN 55424 [. 4 ' RESOLUTION NO. 2013-46 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCES AT 640 FRANCE AVENUE TO BUILD AN 88,974 SQUARE FOOT EMERGENCY AND URGENT CARE CENTER AT FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Fairview Southdale Hospital is proposing to build a two -level 88,974 square foot addition for a new Emergency Care and Urgent Care Center at their site at 6401 France Avenue. The existing Emergency and Urgent Care facility would be remodeled for hospital use. The property is legally described as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1716, Hennepin County Minn. 1.02 With the exception of the requested Variances, the proposed plans meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance Requirements. 1.03 A drive -aisle setback variance from 20 feet to 6 -10 feet is requested for a new round -a -bout drop -off and pick -up area adjacent to Crosstown Highway is requested. 1.04 A parking stall Variance from 2,728 to 2,051 spaces is requested. 1.05 On May 22, 2012 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Site Plan and the proposed Variances. Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the parking space variance and drive aisle setback variance. 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the. existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0389 R$SOLUTION NO. 2013-46 Page Two 3. The variances requested are reasonable. The drive -aisle setback variance would have no impact on Crosstown Highway. There would still be a 40 -foot green space separation between the freeway on ramp and the hospital drive - aisle. The parking study concludes that the site would be adequately parked. 4. The west parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Site Plan and Variances at 6401 France Avenue for Fairview Southdale Hospital. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped April 24, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 24, 2013 & April 29, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 17, 2013. 6. Should delays and queuing become an issue at the France Avenue/ 65 Street intersection in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 7. Fire lanes must be signed subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-46 Page Two 8. Submit a copy of the Minnesota Department of Transportation drainage permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet MnDot's requirements. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on November 20, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 4, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013 City Clerk -.7 L1 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING BUILDING ...... ....... ----------- I a DUNHAMPIRI SLul FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion A0,1 0C Vok CONySSi OVERALL PLANTING PLAN SM PLAN MPILIC-ON L100 REQUIRED TREES LOT PERIMETER -U 2W SS TREES (FOR EVERY 4U) EASING NEW "EC—loi-,Ow.uuh 0 FLOWERING ORNAMEi4TAL -.7 L1 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING BUILDING ...... ....... ----------- I a DUNHAMPIRI SLul FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion A0,1 0C Vok CONySSi OVERALL PLANTING PLAN SM PLAN MPILIC-ON L100 PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE Z EXISTING BUILDING GENERAL NOTES: .4 n-7— LEGEND 61, 0' .... ........ . 4. TOTA' 04 EPM 13 RFG/10 — A lK A PAR, FAdRVIEW —Fairview Southdale Emergency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expansion is \ 0% ............. .................................... . ........ ....... ............ I I.... - q ..... . ; ..... CAKF]i WA .......................................... ....... ............................ ......... . .. la .. . . . .......... WN /4 j NEW BUILDING .... ..... . PA/36 .......................... .......................................................................................... V................. .. ......... ............ ....... %!: ................ . .. ....................................... . ... - - - ........... . ............ 1 ........... ............................................................... .......... ........................... • jp" i .............................................. ......... .......... % .. ....................................... .............. ....... I .... .... A PAR, FAdRVIEW —Fairview Southdale Emergency Expansion - 6w- /4 j COO UEQ MRIL24,27 PLANTING PLAN • jp" i .......... .. L101 .eu'ESOr b4p `�' ' 9y °4 Minnesota Department of Transportation II Metropolitan District aa° Waters Edge Building °F,°a g 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 May 20, 2013 Jackie Hoogenakker City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 SUBJECT: Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion MnDOT Review # S 13 -033 Southeast of TH 62 and France Ave Edina, Hennepin County Control Section 2774 Dear Ms. Hoogenakker: Thank you for submitting the Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion to MnDOT for review. MnDOT has reviewed the plans and has the following comments: Design/Traffic: Please submit retaining wall plans for review. MnDOT needs additional retaining wall details to determine if there are any safety impacts to the eastbound TH 62 entrance ramp. Please direct questions regarding this comment to Nancy Jacobson (651- 234 -7647 or nancy.ljacobson@state.mn.us) of MnDOT's Metro Design Section. Water Resources: A drainage permit is required for the proposed project. MnDOT will not allow an increase in discharge to MnDOT right -of -way. Please submit the following information with the drainage permit application: • Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows • Final drainage plan showing storm sewer plan, storm sewer and culvert profiles and contours • Existing and proposed drainage facilities computations for the 2, 10, and 100 year rainfall events Please direct any questions regarding water resources to Hailu Shekur (651- 234 -7521 or hailu.shekur@state.mn.us) of MnDOT Metro District's Water Resources Section. Permits: As, previously stated, a drainage permit is required. Additionally, any use of or work within or affecting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at http: / /www.dot.state.mn.us /utility/ Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Jeff Dierberger (651- 234 -7916 or Jeffrey .dierberger(,state.mn.us) of MnDOT Metro District's Permits Section. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf. version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e -mail at metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us provided that each separate e- mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MnDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftp: / /ftp2. dot. state. mn. us / pub / incoming /MetroWatersEdge /Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234 -7793. Sincerely, Michael J. Corbett, PE Senior Planner Copy sent via E -Mail: Jeff Dierberger, Permits Nancy Jacobson, Design Hailu Shekur, Water Resources Becky Parzyck, Right -of -Way April Crockett, Area Engineer Clare Lackey, Traffic Cary Teague, City of Edina Ann Braden, Metropolitan Council student scholarships for St. Thomas. Johnson and Ling thanked the Commission for their time and asked for their support of the variance request. Discussion A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agree nt that the lot Id be unbuildable without a variance, adding there are practical difficultie o support grant' .the variance. Motion Commissioner moved varian approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner seconded t J,06 motion. All voted aye; motion carried. C. Site Plan Review. Brian Lubben, Walker & Associates /Fairview Southdale Hospital. 6401 • J� France Avenue, Edina, MN • `Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Fairview Southdale Hospital is proposing to build a two -level 88,974 square foot addition for a new Emergency Care and Urgent Care Center at their site at 6401 France Avenue. The existing Emergency and Urgent Care facility would be remodeled for hospital use. To accommodate the proposed addition the following is requested; a Site Plan Review, drive -aisle setback from 20 -feet to 6 -10 feet for the new round -a -bout drop off and pick up area and drive aisle in front of the addition adjacent to Crosstown Highway and a Parking Stall Variance from 2,728 to 2,051 spaces. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for Fairview Southdale Hospital based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the parking space variance and drive aisle setback variance. 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses. 3. The variances requested are reasonable. The drive -aisle setback variance would have no impact on Crosstown Highway. There would still be a 40 -foot green space separation between the freeway on ramp and the hospital drive - aisle. The parking study concludes that the site would be adequately parked. 4. The west parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. Approval of the Site Plan is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped April 24, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 24, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 17, 2013. 6. Should delays and queuing become an issue at the France Avenue /65 Street intersection in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 7. Fire lanes must be signed subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. Appearing for the Applicant Robert Gruman, Administrator Fairview Southdale Hospital, Brian Lubben, Walker & Associates, Vicki Hooper and Amy Dunlap hGA. Applicant Presentation Robert Gruman gave a brief history of the hospital and the request and introduced the development team. Concluding, Gruman asked the Commission for their support. Vikki Hopper with the aid of graphics explained the 89,000 square foot emergency center addition. Hooper said the build out includes shel I space on three .levels and 9,420 square feet of renovated space. Hooper explained that the project includes observation units on the second level to accommodate patient stays of less than 24 hours, main level emergency services and basement area for office space. Hooper also added the helipad will be relocated and existing central plant will be enlarged to accommodate the additional program area. Amy Dunlap explained to the Commission the materials that will be used on the addition. Brian Lubben explained to the Commission the variance request for setback is to provide easy movement within the site for vehicles. The variance would be from the outermost curve of the roundabout. Continuing, Lubben explained the second variance is for parking, adding that Fairview Southdale Hospital (FSH) has conducted multiple parking counts and found on average the current daily peak usage is roughly 1,500 vehicles. Lubben said the highest count complied was roughly 1,700 spaces. Lubben noted the reduction from 2,575 spaces to 2,051 spaces would still provide 37 percent more parking spaces than the actual daily peak use and 21 percent more than the highest recorded parking usage. Concluding, Lubben stated that he believes the increased visits to the emergency room would increase incrementally. Russ Williams addressed the Commission and stated that the new emergency center would be high quality and would meet the needs of the aging population. Williams said their goal is to provide absolute care for the region, adding Fairview Southdale Hospital ranks #1 in survival rates for heart attack patients. Concluding, Williams said the community deserves a great emergency room. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel commented that he observed on the plans that there is quite a distance between the freeway and the ramp and questioned if the County would require screening. Grabiel said he wondered if vehicle headlights from the new entrance to the ER could shine on vehicles accessing Hwy 62 via the ramp off France Avenue. Commissioner Platteter also questioned if the County had any plans to widen the entrance ramp. Mr. Gruman responded that the plans have been submitted to MnDOT for their review. Chair Staunton asked for a "walk- through" of the internal and external building functions before and after expansion. With graphics Gruman pointed out the changes to the site as the result of the expansion. Gruman also noted that the new emergency center (ER) would be constructed while the present ER is operating. This provides the utmost care of Fairview's patients. Commissioner Carr commented that she has used the ER in the past with her mother and expressed concern about emergency parking during the construction phase. Gruman said everything will be done to minimize difficulty in parking during this time. Gruman reported that they are considering starting a valet service for the ER and will add additional parking spaces at the front. Gruman acknowledged that emergency parking availability during the construction phase would need to be strictly monitored to ensure adequate parking. Commissioner Forrest commented that she shares the concern about emergency parking and asked Mr. Gruman if he knows what the percentage of trips to the ER is from ambulances. Forrest said in her opinion more needs to be done to address temporary emergency parking; she stated presently emergency parking is confusing, adding parking may be adequate but its where the emergency parking is located that's the problem.. Gruman responded that he believes % of the ER visits are by ambulance. Commissioner Scherer also noted urgent care parking demands. Gruman said the reconfiguration of the interior spaces would bring the urgent care component closer to the emergency room, acknowledging adequate parking is a very important component during the construction phase and after. Commissioner Platteter questioned the number of handicapped parking stalls indicated on the plans, adding the required handicapped parking spaces need to be met; however, it may be possible to provide more "short term" parking if this area exceeds the required spaces for handicap parking. Mr. Gruman responded that parking in front of the ER hasn't been finalized, adding he would look into those numbers. Commissioner Potts questioned if more parking could be accommodated elsewhere on the campus. Mr. Gruman responded that the ramp is designed to "hold" three more levels. Gruman reiterated FSH doesn't want an issue with parking. Potts asked what would trigger another level. Gruman noted that parking spaces are carefully monitored and the hospital would request another level before the parking formula requiring an additional level would even "kick in ". Gruman also added that emergency parking appears to be at its highest during the evenings and weekends, not during peak times. Commissioner Carr said the addition of valet parking for the ER is a good start and asked Mr. Gruman if Fairview was considering some type of roof top decking or green space. Mr. Gruman said those plans haven't been finalized; however landscaping would be revisited, adding they plan on adding additional landscaping for this project. Chair Staunton said his one concern is safety near the roundabout. He asked the applicant to take another look at spacing in this area. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Hearing The following spoke in support of the project: Kevin Waterston, 7110 France Avenue, Edina, MN Martin Kirsch, 6729 Penn Avenue South, Richfield, MN Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none Commissioner Potts moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Chuck Rickart, WSB traffic consultant if he had any comments on the project. Chuck Rickart explained that he analyzed the potential traffic and parking impacts from the proposed expansion of the Fairview Southdale Emergency Center and broke it into three pieces; urgent care, existing ER and new space. Rickart said in the short term he finds no issues. He added no modification to the access is planned with the expansion project; however, the ring road is planned to be modified to include a new roundabout that will accommodate the new expansion. Continuing, Rickart pointed out redevelopment is planned in this area which includes the 65th Street intersection and when /if the growth of the proposed redevelopments causes this intersection to breakdown the hospital would be responsible for paying their portion of any changes /modifications made to the intersection. Concluding, Rickart said with regard to parking that Fairview Southdale has very extensive parking numbers, adding his analysis supported their numbers adding he was comfortable with those numbers. Motion Commissioner Carpenter commented he has no problem with the proposal as submitted. Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. Chair Staunton suggested that the applicant take another look at the area between the new roundabout and MnDOT freeway, property and find a way to buffer that area and to ensure an adequate turn around radius. Mr. Grumman responded that they would take the initiative and review this area and provide some form of buffer; probably through landscaping. Commissioner Forrest also suggested that they take another look at emergency parking availability from the users perspective. All voted aye; motion carried. 8 -0 491�,r� o� a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague May 22, 2013 VI.C. Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Fairview Southdale Hospital is proposing to build a two -level 88,974 square foot addition for a new Emergency Care and Urgent Care Center at their site at 6401 France Avenue. (See location on pages Al A5.) The existing Emergency and Urgent Care facility would be remodeled for hospital use. (See project narrative on pages A6 —A19; and the proposed plans on pages A20 —A37.) To accommodate the proposed addition, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review. 2. Drive -aisle setback from 20 -feet to 6 -10 feet for the new round -a -bout drop off'and pick up area and drive aisle in front of the addition adjacent to Crosstown Highway. (See page A28.) 3. Parking Stall Variance from 2,728 to 2,051 spaces. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Crosstown Highway 62 further north, single - family homes, zoned and guide low- density residential Easterly: The Colony Condominiums; zoned and guided for high- density residential Southerly: Southdale Medical Building; zoned and guided Regional Medical District Westerly: Fairview Hospital parking ramp Existing Site Features The subject property is 13.8 acres in size and contains the Fairview Southdale Hospital and parking ramp, and a freestanding medical office building. The site is 16.7 acres in size when adding the parking ramp site on the west side of France. (See pages A3 —A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: RM, Regional Medical (See page A5a.) Zoning: RMD, Regional Medical District. (See page A2.) Site Access The primary access to the site would remain be off of 65th Street West. Users of the new facility would just continue north and west to the new Emergency and Urgent Care. The same parking ramp would be used. The site will continue to be two way all around the hospital. (See page A5 and A26.) Parking & Traffic As mentioned above, a parking space variance is requested to accommodate the required number of parking spaces for the site. Based on the square footage of the hospital, medical offices, expanded emergency room, number of doctors and beds, 2,728 parking spaces are required for the entire site; that includes the anticipated number of employees as a result of the expansion. There are 2,051 parking spaces on the site including both parking ramps. WSB and Associates completed a traffic and parking study for the existing and proposed hospital operations. (See study on pages A37 —A85.) The study concludes that the existing adjacent roadways can support the proposed addition, and there would be adequate parking provided. (See pages A49 —A50 of the study.) Although study concludes that no improvements are required at this time, in the future at France Avenue /65th Street intersection they are anticipated. Should delays and queuing become an issue in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital would be responsible for their share of those improvements. Landscaping The proposed landscape plan exceeds the City's requirements. Based on the perimeter of the site, 85 over story trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs are required. The side would contain 164 existing and proposed over story trees around the site & a full complement of understory trees and shrubs. (See landscape plan on pages A31 —A32.) 2 Grading & Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the plans and found them generally acceptable and offered comments and conditions for approval. (See city engineer memo on page Al 15.) These shall be made part of the conditions for approval of the project.. Plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Building Materials The building addition would be light in color to generally match the hospital; building materials would include architectural cast stone, stone, metal panel, curtain wall and glass. (See renderings on pages A21 A25.) The applicant will present a materials board at the Planning Commission meeting. Variance — Drive Aisle Setback Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The access drive is located adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. (See page A28.) There is no direct access to the highway from the hospital site. The hospital site is elevated from Crosstown; therefore, the paved surface would not be visible from the highway. The practical difficulty is caused by the right -of- way taken for the freeway entrance ramp. As a result there is excess green space (40 feet) between the highway and the round -a -bout turn around; which would appear that there is adequate separation from the highway. 3 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The Hospital site is unique in the RMD zoning district. There are no other hospital sites within the district. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. There is adequate (40 feet) green space between the hospital drive aisle and the Crosstown Highway. There is also a 5 -foot chain link fence separating the uses. Variance — Parking Stalls Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns.. Staff believes the proposed parking stall variance is reasonable. A parking study was conducted by WSB Associates that concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Hospital site. The study concludes that the hospital could function adequately with 1750 and 1850 parking spaces. There are an existing 2,051 spaces on the site. (See pages A49 —A50 of the parking study.) When the hospital was expanded back in 2000, the specific City Code calculation was not done, rather, a parking analysis was done which concluded that there would be adequate parking. (See minutes from Planning Commission and City Council meetings on pages A86 —Al 14.) That study has proven to be accurate, as the parking has functioned adequately. The City of Edina does not want to require unnecessary paving or parking ramps for parking stalls that are not needed. !I 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. Again, the hospital site is unique in the RMD zoning district. It is the only regional hospital in Edina. There are no other 16.5 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. Again, the City would rather see green space and development rather than large parking lots or ramps that are not needed. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a larger and taller structured parking ramp, either on the west side of France or on hospital site. Based on the parking study done by WSB, this parking would not be needed. Compliance Table * Variance Required ** Assumes a 10% increase in staff with the addition 5 City Standard (PCD -3) Proposed Building Addition Setbacks Front — Crosstown Highway 35 feet 65 feet Front — West 65`h Street 35 feet 200+ feet Front,— France Avenue 35 feet 200+ feet Side — East 100 feet 200+ feet Parking & Drive Aisle Setbacks Front — Crosstown Highway 20 feet 6 & 10 feet* Front — West 65th Street 20 feet 200+ feet Front — France Avenue 20 feet 200+ feet Side — East 10 feet 200+ feet Building Height Twelve Stories or 144 feet Two Stories & whichever is less 32 feet Maximum Floor Area 1.0 of the tract .94 of the tract Ratio (FAR) Tract size = 16.7 acres or Gross s.f. = 728,559 s.f. 687,257 s.f. Parking Stalls (Site) 2,728 ** spaces based on the 2,051 spaces* 1 space per bed; 1 space per 200 square feet of medical office and 1 space per employee on a major shift Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance Required ** Assumes a 10% increase in staff with the addition 5 PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue Is the proposed emergency and urgent care addition and associated Variances reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for six reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the RMD, Regional Medical District. 2. The proposed building setbacks are met. 3. The proposed addition could be supported by the existing roadway system, based on the traffic and parking study done by WSB and Associates. (See pages A37— A85.) 4. With the exception of the drive -aisle setback and parking stall variances, the proposal meets all minimum zoning ordinance requirements. . 5. The variances are reasonable. The drive -aisle setback variance would have no impact on Crosstown Highway. There would still be a 40 -foot green space separation between the freeway on ramp and the hospital drive - aisle. The parking study concludes that the proposed addition and existing uses on the site would be supported by the existing parking facilities. Traditionally, the City of Edina has not required parking stalls, when they are not needed. Additional parking could be provided by adding levels to the existing parking ramps if needed. 6. Fairview Hospital provides a convenient community asset that provides a vital service to the City of Edina and surrounding area. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for Fairview Southdale Hospital. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the parking space variance and drive aisle setback variance. R 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses. 3. The variances requested are reasonable. The drive -aisle setback variance would have no impact on Crosstown Highway. There would still be a 40- foot green space separation between the freeway on ramp and the hospital drive - aisle. The parking study concludes that the site would be adequately parked. 4. The west parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. Approval of the Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 24, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped April 24, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 24, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 17, 2013. 6. Should delays and queuing become an issue at the France Avenue /65 Street intersection in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required VA in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their share of those improvements. - 7. Fire lanes must be signed subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. Deadline for a city decision: August 20, 2013 r 8 City of Edina Legend FUghlightd ME City Umits IV MOL M mm on ■ Parhs ON ■ ■ ■ — — _— � ?— i ter' ■� !l-.._. __ x;11111 11111 11111 II111 _- rirll _■ ■_— " —_—_; - •• -r -� ��, __•ss __ __ ■11 1111 1 _- __ __ _ -- - mss' ■r ■ 1 sQ oI �■ __ ._ _- 1 11111 �� i ri�� r� p• �����'ii �`� ��� � _- �__ -_ I�n� :- :�► ,..gyp l�.,��� -- !_ �I,i�'a�l ��� _I , �i��, ■lI� �� �� rim 1■' _ �IM ...l. mm „111 ■f -fl�� V �iii:1 : ::::� ■ � r!. �I I/ •� ■ 1 �^ 7009 7005 6100' 6101 6200 4f01'4013���� 01 6204 1f 17 5105 62 6108 6203 6711 6108 6111 6209 6212 b210 6117 6212 6215 6218 40 5114 5775 121fi 6119 I I 6110 26"21F- y 5273 6220 6777 6724 34 6777 } 6777 6127 6]01 6218 u 32 6110 6701 5300 ' T6 V a 2 6707 67]2 16 6700 6..05 67M 6309 6700 a `01 6304 m 6109 5708 k fiJ17 6707 16 5303 6317 6311 m 6717 61`2 12 6311 6717 6]16 a 6311 6716 08 6316 5315 6710 6715 W11 w 6310 6]19 6328 6728 6773 fi329 '66 37 6312 6JJ FRlJ7CE AY65 f01�'9 O*Y62 Jo1e 4616 *a Ga00 1610 � 5624 $ 6671 6700 6701 6701 6709 __.. -. 12 6717 .....f..nwaus�.<tct_9cscssm D ~� F� City of Edina 6201.6100' 6201 6200 � 2< 2J p, 610. S. fiSW y .201, 14 2< -� J6213j62121 62 3 6211- 2 6217 6116 X21 #6121 6210 26121 6210 17 '6229 6116 1225 62244 i '6]01 6700 6301 24 6705 '6701 6]05 �pb� 6]09 tt P� 6J 1J 6JC8 IC�`15 BJ 17 .�'0C4� >� 62104" 68ru lir w PID:2902824230169 6401 France Ave S Edina, MN 55410 9M 1, 11 Legend SurrOU dmg House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels D ]JSJ 3720 'Al City Limits Creeks Gem Lake Names Li Lakes Parks Zoning / O APOIAut O.r &P.,Wg Darnel 1 O NDDJ pled Onnbpmnnl D¢1rw41 322 / ■ NO05INtrOl Oerebpnam10�1rie1 83176330^ ® NOD61NmN DevfcmrcnlDdnctl 38 ■ PCD- 11Pbnnd Cenmm�D�e.�iO:l ® PCO 21Pbnnd COMMIOADrs1j w ® PCD-11Pbnnad COnmrOil Onlriel I ® PC9JIPCnnd Cc s+Ortnl Dralnel Q WDip�.d\d —U Dw l id H 120 ■ RID iPlmnaB Una Drslrbtl 1.16 � POD -1 IPbn�d Olf{m Dinrinl Pe0 -2 iPhnnedO Ddrill NM 6 ■ PRD- 11Pmneed Real -a Dmrt l 6!<4 PRO- 21Pbnnd Rc9konld Delritl 24 - ® PRD 7IPbnnel ROSEOn:.D.—I 6500 ® PRD J IPIanrud R viienfal Ds " 6550 ® PRO.51PImnd RaOe-14 D--j 3250 S ■ PSR4Il N — Senier a.—I ■ R.t lsbsb D.vOmyDwl �� 6626 ® R.21Deveo OwvDnp ml ■ RMOiRgonalNdcalDntml Parcels �Ik r` ill FO A� City of Edina 1116 41044100 �:- x `16120 �4`a 6123 UfIJ /17181]6 B7J16146 61M 61186179 611f 6115612! 6125 G12d 61156731' 6137 Lagen Surrounding House Numher 7110. 8•'4108 Pa 611/ >4 "t1K. 8110 8141 all 8177 8137 6128 8118 6118 _. 6129 8128 '4178 Label, La 6201 112 JIU1 - 4009!0056700 6701 6100 6105' 4016205 6205 6104 8101 6200 6701 8700 71 N 'n P.— Number La be is d705 6105 7111 6708 6209 670d 6105 6101 620.610( 1i 1 ` � ,,.f` _ , .,. _ - Street Name Labels 621 : - 6708 6109 .6111 6711 ;. ,.. 6106108 6109 8708 6217 8717 '� ��. M �.. - - r 7A7A ]420 6< "00 ,./ City Lhnita 6110 -' •6117 6111 6115 6116 6117 6116 67117 6717 6117 21 7350 Creaks 1210 611! 6113 6116 6110 6120 6114_ b110 6117 6116 6217 Lake 111et Na /1]6 6178 613Y ,6170 1 61 J 6277 6275 6771 8711 6210 6271 6710 Y1 7164 ( O (2]I 6131 6277 6117. � 6701 6278 6150, 6227 ---- 8219 fi111 6715 6723 iA bti : 3261 105 ,,.. N� 1 Parks 16701 U',o 6703 6131 4228 6700 614 670 ,w00 6707 6700 6301 1i yi 6703 ' ! (�� Parcels Is L.� 1726 6305- C 6309 6700 7120 - 'F- 6]08 - ,ice d 6705 6101 630c 6707 �1� +r 0 10 '- 2012 Photo 8764 6709 _ 6717 6707 4216 6709 6712 c 6717 6312671) 6]09 6]08 F7U9 6712 �. F7f7 6308 S�` 7.1® .t 67776716 6377 4212 -' it 6371 6717 6716 6311 6716 a 6311 6317 6714 / T (768 6716 67.3 6710 6713 6]24 V 6724 6]11 E12 �' 1 6770 '. .. '4104- ' '� F6l 6320 6719 6728 6719 6716 F325 �!'/ • - :, 1 �"� �f� ?8 1200 6728 U7 ?l 6771 67]] -- '—CIA •' ti k i7c -sg665 »= 6767 - ,., 2 i+0 , ■ ,640d UJIM Y w 6416 (4018 40-0 '. :k. G 6401 6426 .5.. �. !,` 11 fa f�aw• Y 1..x1114355 6432 -15 - 7 -_ 1 .5TH 23 `w f s i f6 25 _ i h517 y 6506. 0 C ! f 6517_. P 6650 r A 16515. 7100' 1 • - � I s ' � � . �� h2i 6515 /f+ S.l ' 3250 � s R =n.� � Pry .�..' I 654 t � 7i •..'. ff1 2(IJ 3777 3,JJ16j` f� _6619 57 IN x3101 .. 5611 - •• .• 1; .. 6616 y�%•"' 7710 6611 7 61fi 6620 6617 66^4 E6 1��! '_'fir _ I, i 610 - ~ < !•T£ 3710 �' 6615 C � \v fi7000 6701 t / J ' ' ` ' ] ]0 _ • 6 18 - 6705 6705 i• Y ' • y' '� t ; '' 200 6636 67U� •'vD V'` 100 670! S, 6715 \••� 6177 �'• I . _ +Mcn1s c (cl:OriSGI. U �. / i •' , a.. PID: 2902824230169 ^ ♦nl I o _ 6401 France Ave S f � Q „ tia L Edina, MN 55410 r� �p `..x(17 . 1 AFB \`-'., A� vll;A,,---,- ' � ' ' ' M- 114 wrowl —I- 14* Lit % lt� ot mc mw�p ow mul MIS jai Fr FRANGEAVES Iw tt sa ICIZ- '`. •� .5t- �� ter_ mil. :4I E' �'� 0.�~ •,. _ + ___ DFEYIAYE"S Ilk N � ,. 'y Z CIS 5� ya�y{ a•� _- � � uA, � �l h�� � '1 v� FRANCE AVE S - -_ Or mb GI •V ' tz c v ([,, rr �/ rr'' yam(• q��r•rr�� y�-,[� �r�( pr n j .. R C� 11' � *►•6FfC =t. liF+'; !f7 iWY T44A��77',,��+WO .d'1 � _r il� I a�,• � � Alibi tit 44iu � r.' -. dE �J '`. •� .5t- �� ter_ mil. :4I E' �'� 0.�~ •,. _ + ___ DFEYIAYE"S Ilk N � ,. 'y Z CIS 5� ya�y{ a•� _- � � uA, � �l h�� � '1 v� FRANCE AVE S - -_ Or mb GI •V ' tz Leyend LOR- LOW Denser ResideMal OR -Office Residential RM. Regianal 14e61a1 LDAR- LmaDenser AVwhed Restental 0 -OMce OSP- Open Space and Palls MDR - MedWm DenstlY Resldantlal MXC -Mlaed We Center gY3 =' -• PSP- PUNUSent Pubic FDR- High Densty Residential CAC- O.- IIYAIWRYCentb LAM - United Atc.ss Hgt o - - tC -H Igh1,ont6od Cdnn 1al I. InNstrial P1 IIDR W Caen 11 4 2 650 St 12 35 R f SI I j 4 4 F 71 2 OR ' W 6 71 h 51 2 _J 10 t 3 t� C• 8 8 ~� 4 2 3 2 LL Heioht Limits 4 2 Stories: 24' 2 2 3 Stories: 36' 4 Stories: 48' - 5 Stories: 60' 4 8 Stories: 96' 9 Stories: 108' 10 Stories: 120' p „al,,,,, Ate, � 4 IIDR 4 12 Stories: 144' 2 ElStandard Height HDR J 9 Podium Height W 7611, SI I ; 11IDR 1212 4 OR ' •.� '`., g 2 - ,1 W 7711, E1 L-1 12 rriiriq }ori � Futur e Land Use Plan with ov"I"'IW4 City of Edina Building Heights 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Southeast Quadrant Figure 4.613 Data Source: URS e 0 0.5 Mires A'So� ft Fairview Southdale Hospital — Emergency Center-Expansion *40 22 April 2013, Walker & Associates ®. Site Plan Application — Written Statement Introduction For nearly fifty years Fairview Southdale Hospital has fulfilled its mission to provide high quality, low cost, exceptional healthcare for patients and families. Completion of this proposed addition in 2015 will mark a milestone in Fairview's continued growth since completion of the original building in 1965. Project Drivers • Emergency room visits to this facility are expected to grow to approximately 50,000 per year �\ • Current Emergency Department occupies approximately 15 000 square feet and is at capacity ytiN���� g Y p p pP Y q p Y ��c�P.��`� • Increase capacity and flexibility while improving flow and integration of services a • Optimize use of site and improve access to all functions • Strengthen brand identify from Highway 62 and France Avenue PQR Project Components • Combines Emergency Care with Urgent Care in one integrated and efficient space • Improves site access to the Emergency Department / Urgent Care and other functions • Adds 88,974 square feet of new built -out and shell space on three levels and 9,420 square feet of renovated space • Adds an Observation unit to accommodate patient stays of less than 24 hours • Relocates the existing helipad to the roof of the east wing • Expands the existing Central Plant to serve the additional program area Page 1 of 2 Design Considerations ■ Over the past approximately eight months Fairview Southdale Hospital has worked closely with their Design Team to move this project forward. This highly skilled team of consultants provides professional services including masterplanning, site survey, geotechnical, environmental, architectural, civil engineering, landscape design, interior design, structural engineering, medical equipment planning, emergency department planning, lean planning, virtual reality, cost estimating, furniture, fixture, and equipment planning, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, low voltage planning, helipad planning, traffic and parking planning, construction auditing, special inspections and testing, commissioning, signage design, elevator planning, and project management. ■ The team has enrolled this project in Xcel Energy's Design Assistance Program and is working with Xcel's facilitator, the Weidt Group, to analyze the proposed project, create an energy model to predict energy use, develop strategies to conserve energy, implement the selected strategies, and then monitor the results. ■ We looked closely at providing additional sustainable features in this building such as a green roof. There are limited opportunities to provide significant areas of green roof and many of these are interrupted by mechanical equipment. In the end we elected to focus our effort on the new building systems, mechanical systems, and electrical systems that will make this project as energy efficient as possible. Key Team Members �1 Fairview Southdale Hospital has selected several key team members to assist them with this project. These team members are highly experienced in healthcare development and have worked with Fairview Southdale Hospital on past projects... • HGA Architects • Dunham • The Weidt Group • Knutson Construction • Walker & Associates -VV�� ` 0,9 2 , 2013 Pap- 2 of 2 Fairview Southdale Hospital — Emergency Center Expansion 6 May 2013, Walker & Associates Site Plan Application — Written Statement Major Project Components With improved access and a combined Emergency Care and Urgent Care, the completed addition provides 88,974 square feet of new built -out and shell space on three levels and 9,420 square feet of renovated space. Included in the project is an Observation Unit at the Second Level to accommodate patient stays of less than 24 hours, a relocated helipad at the Third Level roof of the east wing, and expansion of the existing Central Plant to serve the additional program area. Variance Application — Setback To allow easy movement within the site for emergency and other large vehicles, we propose to'reduce the required setback from the required ten feet to seven feet in a limited area adjacent to the outermost curve of the roundabout. Variance Application — Parking Actual average daily peak usage at the site is currently 1,495 parking spaces and the highest recorded parking usage is 1,690 parking spaces. We propose to reduce the required 2,575 spaces to 2,051 parking spaces. This amount of parking is still a full 37 percent more than the actual average daily peak and 21 percent more than the highest recorded parking usage. Page 1 of 1 EA, Fairview Southdale Hospital — Emergency Center Expansion 22 April 2013, Walker & Associates Variance Application — Parking By the Zoning Ordinance, the Parking Requirement for this project is approximately 2,575 spaces. When this project is completed, the campus will provide 2,051 parking spaces. The actual average daily peak usage at the site is currently 1,495 parking spaces and the highest recorded parking usage is 1,690 parking spaces. We request a Parking Variance to accommodate construction of this new project. Condition Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance Answer Explanation Yes Long term monitoring of parking use by the Owner confirms that the current parking tr- provided on this campus easily meets the current parking need. Projections indicate QI- that the existing parking arrangement will serve the parking needs of the expanded facility as well. This approach to serving the parking need is proven and reasonable. Yes This facility is landlocked on all sides and does not have the option to construct additional areas of surface parking. Most of the parking needs for the facility are served by parking ramps at the east and west sides of the campus. Current and future parking needs are well met by the current parking arrangement. Yes The current parking arrangement provides ample, convenient, and safe parking in accordance with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. Not alter the essential character of a Yes The current parking arrangement has been in place since 2002 and fits well with the neighborhood surrounding neighborhood. _ - h APR 242013 Page 1 of 1 Fairview Southdale Hospital — Emergency Center Expansion 22 April 2013, Walker & Associates Existing Condition P/D, Building Use, Site Area in Floor Area Gross Floor Area Parking Spaces Property Address Owner/Taxpayer Square Feet, in Square Feet* in Square Feet ** 'Acres 3002824140001, West Parking Ramp, 125,484 0 0 1,018 structured 6400 France Avenue South IRET Properties 2.88 2902824230169, Hospital, East Parking Ramp, 531,671 561,562 Hospital, 514,783 74 surface, 6401 France Avenue South and Central Plant, 12.21 12,868 975 structured Nt- Fairview Southdale Hospital Central Plant 2902824230170, Medical Office Building, 21,021 60,275 Estimated 54,248 0 2902824230171, IRET Properties 0.48 6405 France Avenue South 2902824230166, Medical Office Building, 44,402 77,136 Estimated 69,442 0 6363 France Avenue South IRET Properties 1.02 2902824230167, Unbuilt, 5,981 0 0 0 Address Unassigned Fairview Southdale Hospital 0.14 Totals 728,559 711,841 638,473 2,067 16.73 * Excludes parking ramps only ": F• ** Excludes parking ramps, mechanical rooms, restrooms, elevator shafts, stairwenl -,, "a id similar paces according to the Zoning Ordinance APR 2 4 2013 Page 1 of 3 Completed Condition PID, Building Use, Site Area in Floor Area Gross Floor Area Parking Spaces Property Address Owner /Taxpayer Square Feet, In Square Feet* in Square Feet ** Acres 3002824140001, West Parking Ramp, 125,484 0 0 1,018 structured 6400 France Avenue South IRET Properties 2.88 2902824230169, Hospital, East Parking Ramp, 531,671 650,536 Hospital, Estimated 594,860 58 surface, 6401 France Avenue South and Central Plant, 12.21 13,200 975 structured Fairview Southdale Hospital Central Plant 2902824230170, Medical Office Building, 21,021 60,275 Estimated 54,248 0 2902824230171, IRET Properties 0.48 6405 France Avenue South 2902824230166, Medical Office Building, 44,402 77,136 Estimated 69,442 0 6363 France Avenue South IRET Properties 1.02 2902824230167, Unbuilt, 5,981 0 0 0 Address Unassigned Fairview Southdale Hospital 0.14 Totals 728,559 801,147 Estimated 718,550 2,051 16.73 * Excludes parking ramps only ** Excludes parking ramps, mechanical rooms, restrooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, and similar spaces according to the Zoning Ordinance PaeP 2 of 3 Parking Required Property Address Building Use, Licensed Peak Shift Peak Employees Required Owner/Taxpayer Patient Beds Per Shift Parking* 6401 France Avenue South Hospital, 326 Day 1,525 1,851 Fairview Southdale Hospital 6405 France Avenue South Medical Office Building, 0 Day 180 Estimated 320 IRET Properties 6363 France Avenue South Medical Office Building, 0 Day 175 Estimated 404 IRET Properties Totals 326 1,880 2,575 c-6 *According to the Zoning Ordinance, Required Parking is calculated as follows; Medical or Dental Offices and Clinics - One space for each 200 square feet of Gross Floor Area, plus one space per physician or dentist; Hospitals - One space per bed, plus one space per employee or volunteer on the major shift Parking Provided and Used Parking Structures Building Use, Parking Users Peak Days Parking Spaces Average Peak Owner /Taxpayer Provided Occupied Parking Spaces East Parking Ramp, Parking Structures, Patients, Visitors, Tuesday and 1,993 1,455 West Parking Ramp, Fairview Southdale Hospital and Staff Wednesday Surface Parking Surface Parking, Patients, Visitors, Tuesday and 58 Estimated 40 Fairview Southdale Hospital and Staff Wednesday Totals 2,051 1,495 Page 3 of 3 Fairview Southdale Hospital — Emergency Center Expansion 22 April 2013, Walker & Associates Variance Application — Setback By Zoning Ordinance, the setback to the roundabout within our site is ten feet. To allow easy movement within the site for emergency and other large vehicles we propose to reduce the setback to four feet in the limited area adjacent to the outermost curve of the roundabout. We request a Parking Variance to accommodate construction of this new project. Condition Answer Explanation Relieve practical difficulties in Yes The need to expand this facility is potentially compromised by the tightly constricted complying with the zoning ordinance site. Expansion of the roundabout allows for better flow of emergency vehicles, fire M and that the use is reasonable department equipment, and other larger vehicles. This is a minor accommodation and is reasonable. Correct extraordinary circumstances Yes This facility is landlocked on all sides and has limited area available for expansion to applicable to this property but not fulfill its public mission. The proposed driveway configuration allows some flexibility in applicable to other property in the using the available site area to its best use. vicinity or zoning district Be in harmony with the general Yes The proposed driveway configuration requires this minor variance and accomplishes purposes and intent of the zoning the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. ordinance Not of a ?;the essential character of a Yes The proposed driveway configuration is internal to this building site and fits well with neighborFigtoo the surrounding neighborhood. 2�CP Page 1 of 1 Fairview Southdale Hospital — Emergency Center Expansion 9 May 2013, Walker & Associates Existing Condition P1D, Building Use, Site Area in Floor Area Gross Floor Area Parking Spaces Property Address Owner/Taxpayer Square Feet, in Square Feee in Square Feee Acres 3002824140001, West Parking Ramp, 125,484 0 0 1,018 structured 6400 France Avenue South IRET Properties 2.88 2902824230169, Hospital, East Parking Ramp, 531,671 561,562 Hospital, 484,2503 74 surface, 6401 France Avenue South and Central Plant, 12.21 12,868 975 structured Fairview Southdale Hospital Central Plant 2902824230170, Medical Office Building, 21,021 64,128 57,659 0 2902824230171, IRET Properties 0.48 6405 France Avenue South 2902824230166, Medical Office Building, 44,402 77,958 68,920 0 6363 France Avenue South IRET Properties 1.02 2902824230167, Unbuilt, 5,981 0 0 0 Address Unassigned Fairview Southdale Hospital 0.14 Totals 728,559 716,516 610,829 2,067 16.73 'Excludes parking ramps only 2Excludes parking ramps, mechanical rooms, restrooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, and similar spaces according to the Zoning Ordinance 3Excludes 57,752 square feet along with 326 patient toilets at 60 square feet average per space Page 1 of 1 Completed Condition PID, Building Use, Site Area in Floor Area Gross Floor Area Parking Spaces Property Address Owner /Taxpayer Square Feet, In Square Feee in Square Feee Acres 3002824140001, West Parking Ramp, 125,484 0 0 1,018 structured 6400 France Avenue South IRET Properties 2.88 2902824230169, Hospital, East Parking Ramp, 531,671 650,536 Hospital, 560,6783 58 surface, 6401 France Avenue South and Central Plant, 12.21 13,200 975 structured Fairview Southdale Hospital Central Plant 2902824230170, Medical Office Building, 21,021 64,128 57,659 0 2902824230171, IRET Properties 0.48 6405 France Avenue South l 2902824230166, Medical Office Building, 44,402 77,958 .68,920 0 6363 France Avenue South IRET Properties 1.02 2902824230167, Unbuilt, 5,981 0 0 0 Address Unassigned Fairview Southdale Hospital 0.14 Totals _ 728,559 805,822 687,257 2,051 16.73 'Excludes parking ramps only 2Excludes parking ramps, mechanical rooms, restrooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, and similar spaces according to the Zoning Ordinance 3Excludes 57,752 square feet along with 326 patient toilets at 60 square feet average per space Fj Pago ') of 2 Parking Required Property Address Building Use, Licensed Peak Shift Peak Employees Required Owner /Taxpayer Patient Beds Per Shift Parking' 6401 France Avenue South Hospital, 326 Day 1,525 1,851 Fairview Southdale Hospital 6405 France Avenue South Medical Office Building, 0 Day 180 320 IRET Properties 6363 France Avenue South Medical Office Building, 0 Day 175 404 IRET Properties Totals 326 1,880 2,575 'According to the Zoning Ordinance, Required Parking is calculated as follows; Medical or Dental Offices and Clinics - One space for each 200 square feet of Gross Floor Area, plus one space per physician or dentist; Hospitals - One space per bed, plus one space per employee or volunteer on the major shift Parking Provided and Used Parking Structures Building Use, Parking Users Peak Days Parking Spaces Average Peak Owner /Taxpayer Provided Occupied Parking Spaces East Parking Ramp, Parking Structures, Patients, Visitors; Tuesday and 1,993 1,455 West Parking Ramp, Fairview Southdale Hospital and Staff Wednesday Surface Parking Surface Parking, Patients, Visitors, Tuesday and 58 40 Fairview Southdale Hospital and Staff Wednesday Totals 2,051 1,4951 'Highest recorded parking usage is 1,690 parking spaces Page 3 of 3 Existing Hospital — Excluded Floor Areas 24 April 2013, Fairview Southdale .Hospital Extended Floor Description Area Area Lower Level Mechanical Rooms varies 18,170 Lower Level Janitor /Electrical/ Linen varies 1,513 Lower Level Shafts varies 1,011 1st Floor Mechanical Rooms 211 211 1st Floor Janitor /Electrical/ Linen varies 736 1st Floor Shafts varies 1,666 1st Floor Ambulance Garage 1,948 1,948 2 thru 8 Shafts varies 1,764 2 thru 8 Janitor /Electrical/ Linen varies 3,598 2nd Floor Mechanical Space 2,317 2,317 LL thru 8 Elevator shafts 600 5400 LL thru 3 Elevator shaft #7 180 720 LL thru 8 Stair A thru D 155 5580 2,3 Stair E 168 336 LL- 3 Stair F 180 720 LL -1 Stair G 224 448 LL -1 Stair H 200 400 LL -1 Stair M 160 320 1st Floor Atrium Stairs 1057 1057 LL thru 8 Dumbwaiters 60 540 LL Public /Staff Restrooms varies 1265 1st Floor Public /Staff Restrooms varies 1112 2,3 Public /Staff Restrooms 220 440 4 thru 8 Public /Staff Restrooms 46 (23 ea) 230 9 Penthouse 6250 • Total 57,752 Page 4 of 4 _r-- Emergency Center Expansion — Excluded Floor Areas 24 April 2013, HGA Description Area Basement Level Elevators /Stairwells 725 Mechanical Room 4,272 Electrical / Communication 2,090 Area Well 419 Elevator Equipment 345 Subtotal 7,851 First Level, Elevators /Stairwells 962 Mechanical Shafts 471 Electrical / Communication 420 Public Restrooms 484 Subtotal 2,337 Second Level Elevators /Stairwells 854 Mechanical Shafts 117 Electrical / Communication 307 Patient Toilets (18 at 60 square feet) 1,080 Subtotal 2,358 Total 12,546 Page 5 of 5 _1W IRET Buildings — Excluded and Gross Floor Areas 8 May 2013, Todd Mulvihill, BDH +Young 6405 France Building Third Floor (Second Floor Similar to Third Floor) 12,933 Gross Building 21,376 Verticals 1,716 Service Areas 287 Extrapolated Toilets (4X56.25) 225 Gross Floor Area 19,148 Fourth Floor Gross Building 21,376 Verticals 1,501 Service Areas 287 S Extrapolated Toilets (4X56.25) 225 .,7 Gross Floor Area 19,363 6363 France Building First and Second Floors (Each) Gross Building 12,993 Verticals 1,071 Service Areas 277 - Extrapolated Toilets (4X56.25) 225 Gross Floor Area 11,420 Third through Sixth Floors (Each) Gross Building 12,933 Verticals 911 Service Areas 277 Extrapolated Toilets (4X56.25) _ 225 Gross Floor Area 11,520 Page f; of 6 X I -NEW AMBULANCE GARAGE AERA T.O.Cuff" ■ .K S30 FAIRNIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion IGAIO - I-E-21-1: EXTERIOR ELEVATION RENDERINGS A400. DUNHAMARE 0 0111111 -1 -1 7 -- ----- ---- - - -- - - - - - - - -- - -------------------------- OL ■ 7'. tv I -NEW AMBULANCE GARAGE AERA T.O.Cuff" ■ .K S30 FAIRNIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion IGAIO - I-E-21-1: EXTERIOR ELEVATION RENDERINGS A400. Aj IfA. . DUNHAM�I T.n C1MT�NIn, .�.....w..,......r+.. NR TA. LINll N111�IR '� r. aT£- : •• ,� - � ..: TA.IFIST IIWf �LELEVATION - SECOND IEVEL OBSERVATION UNIT ( EAST ELEVAITON - EAST ENTRY AT EXISnNG GARAGE AREA B] FA ITEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion IISIE DATE —L 11 EXTERIOR ELEVATION RENDERINGS srte aLnx n.rucnnaH A401. Q.� avnarnROi <cLa >a<cLamrATxnofLOOn .,, VARI[WTlOIATTlRN Of <4L -t> • <4L -b iY1 AT lIN% vAIINCArlDranERn O! <cLb a w[s >rrr ATwAmnc F %IST <IIM13> VMIIEWT[O rATTLRN OF <4L]> a <4�]> AT CAST lNTAY /1 SOUTHEAST PERSPECiNE @ SECOND LEVEL OBSERVATION UNIT ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■ ■■ Ir� ■■ Sam ON M_ n NORTHEAST PERSDECTNE @NEW EAST ENTRY wRl> )ovfrt AHO iA)[IA L <MRl> VAAN4ATIDPATTERNOf T1T AT }Np flOOA WA IBM FA1RV(EW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion sa n Tn ni 2ND FLOOR ISSUE WTE AIRA ]A.]M) EXTERIOR ELEVATION RENDERINGS and PLANAP0.1GTpN A402. Zb- W :Q- V1Mf4iTFI M1TFNM p <441a{�44bTYI AT 3ND IlOpI <4L -1 a i ^GLl�a 1YN AT WNRNK Cpl( GN.1 COLUMNS PUCE CAST 3RLWALLWI —AL -I.. N —E CONC SRFWALLWI NORTH P[RSPECTIVE EROM HWV 62 1 I 1 1 1 n NORTHWEST DERSPECrIVE DUN HAMPARkI c° FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion VA— AT[DIAITFNNp mw> i.co-v T1T 3ND ILODR SUIT-UP N40I �CSTN t a <4L l> n N EXTERIOR ELEVATION RENDERINGS nrnxanoN A403. z1-- 4-j -fz Q-P� 3 all noun a bull, *vs. M I■ a 4111 —7j Q=aIXPANSION DUN M AM "M IOU ""' FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion .Gllo — SS—TE —1121 EXISTING SITE PHOTO AND NEW RENDERING snp—R1C — A900 Jj L ,W I>METALF#NEL— HPPGWRANARVAWG TIN6H <MRI> METAL PANEL N1TH PPG WMNAP VAW {WL FINISH OUNHAMPI a y 7. J. <CSTF11>APQINECNPAL USf STONE ._ .. cG41> � � � _�.. .■.■ NSION GLASS <STN I>STONE <G4]> - 1M1SSNSLUCFIIP GU55 FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion BUILDING MATERIAL SAMPLE BOARD A910 ef81 L•IS ` ,�,- —r— da 4pi�s C - - �L —- _ — Fairview � , _ I Southdale : — C 7Emergency C \ // 1��� ,•1� �I IIC Center Expansion _ � n � � I � • � `P� i �:r /!+��`:: "•°� � ,tea ' i I ! — 2 C� P -- -- - --- - - - - - ---- - -- _ — _ �• I� � 'y. • I I j .I,•f I IS9UE WTE AMUL1l d11] • ° dH_ • - - - — ...• . I PLAN L SITE 1 i -,.• e� � --- >1v - - -- ------- --- ---- --- - -- _� Ne,•.rx•r sASac� GENERA c • ``� _• r'm� bass - - �� 6577 sm�r w. ." ° ]IT•PLANAPP„� mnn SITE INFORMATION _ OMER: FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES NO1 FRANCE AVE SOUTH. EDINA. MN 55135 PROPERTY: FMMEW SOUTHUXLE AOOTRICK 7TUCiA•TRACT B•LOT2. BLOCK I- OUROTA TRACT �i SITE DATA I AREA AC AREA OUNHAM121 SITEI PARCEL 1380 807183.85 PROJECT LIMITS 21 C _ IMPERVIOUB ARF_A BEFORE 1 10.80 R AR 11.37 — ZONING REQUIREMENTS 1 EXISTING ZONING: REGIONA MEDICAL DISTRICT •,1 F \�- __� _'_ PROPOSED ZONING: REGIONAL MEDICAL DISTRICT / C ,VyytS / C C AOJAA ENT ZONING: NORTH: NONE (HNN 82) T — — a C SOUTH: M.D. C E C EAST: P.R.D.-4 — [ C WEST: APA _— SETBACICS: FRONT • 35' OR BLDG. HT. SIDE •201 REAR •2D PARKING LOTS: SIDE OR REAR • 10' oW •` ee pa isg -- ./ ,•_y • � - _ _ I �t�c — �..._�B�P.Y._— _ _ 1• -- P �—`.�i FA wEW ef81 L•IS ` ,�,- —r— da 4pi�s C - - �L —- _ — Fairview � , _ I Southdale : — C 7Emergency C \ // 1��� ,•1� �I IIC Center Expansion _ � n � � I � • � `P� i �:r /!+��`:: "•°� � ,tea ' i I ! — 2 C� P -- -- - --- - - - - - ---- - -- _ — _ �• I� � 'y. • I I j .I,•f I IS9UE WTE AMUL1l d11] • ° dH_ • - - - — ...• . I PLAN L SITE 1 i -,.• e� � --- >1v - - -- ------- --- ---- --- - -- _� Ne,•.rx•r sASac� GENERA c • ``� _• r'm� bass - - �� 6577 sm�r w. ." ° ]IT•PLANAPP„� mnn - • �, P TOP -e]s.l r — LP TOP -8)5.) IP 2 ,. ��_'� ct� BITAIAlIN0U5•j`� - — I =F ' I —' bF Ind -e°e'B d�AS) �'� I Nmo 6363 BUILDING - ebs ,�,,,•' - .....��:''��' _,, ; _ _ � — KIN EAST PAR C RAMPI OB y lk- P� I Fairview BUILDING ADDITION - rim a J — -- ;— — Southdale Emergency I PY Center ,.;�, 1 .•w.BdBB .. '� I� — — — I — Expansion �, ' o , —� SGIrIN Feu MuaasorA °'� ` ' ' �- - - „�•o+` - .' � _ DES 0'r rIPJ£S' .ELI ,,•J r I PI,I 1 SfRP�c£ /�� FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL I r! _ 6401 FRANCE AVENUE S As. rw�u�wurn.r�, llS F MINOUS bq9 / � ;!l:0.�•..i =8fi 7.0 � p81 T(51UNE -SEE NEST GR01 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES: DIJIVWRNA61rFErbwEFPEA KEY NOTES LEGEND �,� 1. MPG BrDitYWATFAPERWrFGRCIX9 � G9T M brORU.wATER P4lMIWi ISNPPPI Nllbi 6E PI�PAAm ]. CMIR0.d15f BYAPRYNG WATERASOFTFHAS PEWNEDBY50.AFIII WEATHER CDNDOMrIS. ©56TFF]!0. EASNIO NDE%ORRWR - - ---- APPRWED,ANDBHENENrm A9 PNrtOFTI ¢9PRplER.TNEGWIMGlGN6 ONPROPERCNLTRUCIIONArBlMAM1ENANCEOFALLTENPgURYERaSpNANO��E b CONrNAC1GRMWTRDURNE1Y OSPECTTHE PRNFR SOE FYFAYSEVExmDAY9OVHWDACIIVE E)�THIDCQR4IN -� — ©WIETPROTECT,Gx fLMryIQrEMOVm( ,_ __�_ _ mIE GATE APRIL3..IDrJ BmYENMTgNCRAR0.8. NSPmr%YIB YLWTBEPROPEraY WOlLFN1EA NRABFMIEVFN TTHAT E]CEE09 P8YICNEb.N1 2 TNECONIRACrOR MUSTAIFFLTE SwPw ANO PREPAREAEUPF lE1DMUBEST M.IHA(art]!r ®EROSNYI CDNr110. BLA1a�r SPOr E1F/ATE)H �'U SITE EROSION PRACICEb( BAp) ALTDNPWIA$ NECE59MYroAppRESRCNANG E9NMC:IW1CIIp1 B. ALLHWRINLTWNeL &@FMUBTBERFPAWm,RERACED.OA SUPREMfNIFII WIINFUXCMVAL BLPA OPEMRp1 MANIENANCE WFATNEA, GR bFAWNALCWARgNBTXAT EFFELTINE DGCI4AGE ® ROCN CONSrRUCBW E]R PROFOSm CDMWR9 oRANAGE IT Nrm"AU AND SEDIMENT O PDLLIITANTe TO SURFACE WATER9 MID CDMRV WRN REBIAATGNYAGL CPFAUUEA®!R. In NL CGSIRUCT(W wA. MATERWS UUSr BE PROPFJLLr D6NMma0FFBRE NAPEAMRTED s TNECONRIACIOR MUbrP(ANAxD%WEMENr wrtABU :consruucr�vPNAbwavEGETATn�E DL9PO�F�6n'�. SIRrvA ANOOMERPRAC lICE9 THATMNNGE FAOSNJV NIO COMRr wrtNTrff 1 CGNOUICro ENSURE FIXALBTMU]ATION OP TI@PNaIECTLrE IF PEw]w1EMT eTABRDwrgN —E DRAwADE DNOE PROECT LN08 � CONTROL PLAN INePECRav ANO YNNTENANLE RfDU1REMENr80FTHE NPGGmERIL PERMR@W R10om1L CANNOTOCCUR UR WI1rIN ]MV6OFCOMRETINOGMDINGACTNT', F9'GBU9HTEB�OPMY COxrl10. PMCTICE9 MUR BE Ubm TO NIMM2EbmIMENT ENhTiIxGSURFACE vEGETATNE COVER WIM WTSPHDTYPE ]MULCH. WLET PROTmTNW rrnwnunnnwUnNU O WATWBORAdALEM PROPERTY, ESTABLISH BEDIMFMCWRiIX PRACIICE9AT]LL DO'MI 13. ALL SLOPE88TEEPER TIUN.:I NVBT BE STABRIiEO WIIN GTECARY ]EROSIDN CDMR0.BUlMEr GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE LAN0019NRBN0 ACTNIIIE9 BEGIN.NLSTOPN NlET9MI5TB6 UAV➢DT]5671. PROTECTED%BTH bURAeIE BMW OUWNO CONBTRIICRDN NlR FINPL BTABILWTNW L9 8BTFEXCE BA%11WE 8LILID) SRE PLAN APPLU:ATMSN ESTABLISXm. 13 pyagIDN CDNIRDLFUIER LOG NUSTBE PRODUCTUSTEDGN MnGOPBAPPROVm PPOWCT9 LLRT. b TENPDPARYSOASroCIPRE] MUSTNAVEPFA IItiErEABCTFENCECROTHEREFFECINE N. BT BABRF.D.ATTIEAST75 %OFbIIEMUSTIU GENTVEUcATYk l.8000RERa9NlBLANNETb.r 6mUAENTCONRiIXS. FBEIiLW O�GK FAOSIONCCN010.BlANIaT _ .ZD �% CLOO / r ! BUILDING ADDITION F /' \, \ °� %'. !!•� K\ I ill_— — — a7 FAiRVIEW o Fairview - = a Emergency 6�y ®� — F �0 I Expansion t \ &C, P G� �g e9 \�PJES .. /NEW HELIPAD /ROOF `•. �, mr w ..mrw 5 Fa / FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL TOP xE Exoa La< '' / \.e% �// I I . 10" �0"o 6401 FRANCE AVENUE S. F = F > I TCH LINE -SE SXEETCa02 / •_ — IL Ph _.. _._......_._ ..__.,. LD GENERAL NOTES FOR LAYOUT: KEYNOTES: SURFACING LEGEND: LEGEND: HoAxo: um]+]m Arm wRacIJJ TEn ARE To T]¢ fA0E0FOWBUMES9OTQ :AWi5EHD1ED- B.G(OF OLxex TT•GLLY HNLL�9 SEJYm 1J¢FACEDFGIxE. 2�OVOLEtE9 FOR COtIIIRYCDOX OF xEW fOHOEIE Qj xEW xETNxxGwN1 Q WTOL E>DOJx6 WxM CWRSEIL��1 DVNNOUS WeM GwIaEINNOF]]FDI �PAVE+ExT ONERUJtnAwl BGMGE DOOD AOCE99 LNGLE F:Gx ap t LgwEDATE APNL2J.30+] A Q DOLJARw �� EmAxswJJOerr -- E! -- SITE LAYOUT 6J6J BUILDING Q] aux LDMFETJFwIJH UAx BATEwrsro QE HosEOwx cuXEECUnm =Te iA .Iw,00nun WJ'"` nPP o.°EOCxAxuux weaRADe coxDLnJaxr xLW UAa«fLe � AND SURFACING LAN NFEEF. tl. NIGN JOINT9 WITH WALKZRXEHS. HOPIZONTAL OFFLECJIDNS, wRxNG fARNE0.4, E1C.AND USE fOUAL ANEL8�9. . eEE )DVX%%FOX JOxixG DEFAVt Qe eF]DCOxCRElEOVRSa GIrt1FJ] Q dt] CONCRETE CVRE6GUTlER WIDE CONUIETE BnM � CONCRETE PAVELffM M 1-�aGGREMIE GSE IwaoDt]+M) �f CRETE TA wAPPR0VE0 GRAlSIE IM wBORAOE HEW ORANAGEEJI]UODxE xEW+rvpRAM NEW WIE VALVE jy 61R PLNl PRQIECTLVRIe •IIIIIIIIHVIHIIHINIIInIInI APPLIG1roN • C301 o �,x __- __ Q _ EAST PARKING RAMP w � RJa °_ 5Efl" iii ___ l� G __° _ —i— ,�a"`� •' ./° .i;�r..r, 11 - � ! / r ! BUILDING ADDITION F /' \, \ °� %'. !!•� K\ I ill_— — — a7 FAiRVIEW Fairview = Southdale Emergency — F = I Expansion t \ &C, �g e9 \�PJES .. /NEW HELIPAD /ROOF `•. �, 5 Fa / FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL TOP xE Exoa La< '' / \.e% �// I I . 10" �0"o 6401 FRANCE AVENUE S. F = F > TCH LINE -SE SXEETCa02 / •_ — IL Ph _.. _._......_._ ..__.,. LD GENERAL NOTES FOR LAYOUT: KEYNOTES: SURFACING LEGEND: LEGEND: HoAxo: um]+]m Arm wRacIJJ TEn ARE To T]¢ fA0E0FOWBUMES9OTQ :AWi5EHD1ED- B.G(OF OLxex TT•GLLY HNLL�9 SEJYm 1J¢FACEDFGIxE. 2�OVOLEtE9 FOR COtIIIRYCDOX OF xEW fOHOEIE Qj xEW xETNxxGwN1 Q WTOL E>DOJx6 WxM CWRSEIL��1 DVNNOUS WeM GwIaEINNOF]]FDI �PAVE+ExT ONERUJtnAwl BGMGE DOOD AOCE99 LNGLE F:Gx ap t LgwEDATE APNL2J.30+] FACxc Q DOLJARw �� EmAxswJJOerr -- E! -- SITE LAYOUT .. HAImMU EPACxDaaa+maJOxnxwALJOroEE ]sEET. wraEJJmuruATOx Tle:waxwmTx. e. �nceJO afmHmal.JU+rsNCarxnfTf oeE+]JSET. uAmvu sPACwoa LRJxw e]wAemoxJOxoTGee Q] aux LDMFETJFwIJH UAx BATEwrsro QE HosEOwx cuXEECUnm =Te iA .Iw,00nun WJ'"` nPP o.°EOCxAxuux weaRADe coxDLnJaxr xLW UAa«fLe � AND SURFACING LAN NFEEF. tl. NIGN JOINT9 WITH WALKZRXEHS. HOPIZONTAL OFFLECJIDNS, wRxNG fARNE0.4, E1C.AND USE fOUAL ANEL8�9. . eEE )DVX%%FOX JOxixG DEFAVt Qe eF]DCOxCRElEOVRSa GIrt1FJ] Q dt] CONCRETE CVRE6GUTlER WIDE CONUIETE BnM � CONCRETE PAVELffM M 1-�aGGREMIE GSE IwaoDt]+M) �f CRETE TA wAPPR0VE0 GRAlSIE IM wBORAOE HEW ORANAGEEJI]UODxE xEW+rvpRAM NEW WIE VALVE jy 61R PLNl PRQIECTLVRIe •IIIIIIIIHVIHIIHINIIInIInI APPLIG1roN • C301 .� W C ......... ..... . . . . . . —C �. _. Ed FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion .— —1— —E— —.=13 OVERALL PLANTING PLAN sm — "p—N L100 REQUIRED TREES LOT PERNETER - 3U412.30- EIOSTING NEW 85 TREES (FOR EVERY 40-) 9M'oF'E%0§U. 74, `9 0 0 FLOWERING ORNAMENTAL S- ......... ..... . . . . . . —C �. _. Ed FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion .— —1— —E— —.=13 OVERALL PLANTING PLAN sm — "p—N L100 1`31- PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE GENERALNOTES: 0 LEGEND . . . . . . . . . . EPM 13 CAK DUNHAMPOR] gft�,='�l REOYAM-4160 FIRM —Southdale Emergency Center Expansion -E IFAW PMWAIG PL4V �W OWE F,11WAP ............ . ... . ... . ................ DUNHAMPOR] L101 Fairview —Southdale Emergency Center Expansion -E PMWAIG PL4V L101 O ... 6^ BITUMINOUS -17 AST Qj�P , ✓I m-BBD.I DPI 1y1� J '-", I �J `I = � _` � -- N e)20 R/ ,y1� jY" ��CF �, F.- •�v ''V -N.f r I- _ V• •\' vo in-71. OP -eat5s(( 6363 BU /CD /]V Z. C,A BS(NE),y�rV 0. lr LLLV➢ \ _ _ - ` GRASS — m GRASS '', \ .=i I ED, _ "� tDa• NU �' ®�` mNDS �� 7 --�- " i � EA ST PAR KIN -- M P o AA- I I --A P f� NAAA�rsM R 61T1A11N0U5 �P`"'I"'.y e, a 7a ` N �^,y'�N R i S 4nraP.wwur G LrP' w I I cR TOP w E_ a fi1oPFee1� rDd.e6 - ,�..,.I�i,✓� Ny_eeaB,::; cB 8 LzDyr .3iNVZm wY BwJ iV ^ --iY.a LA - ty_,y+,Qab �"'Fa'7 ■ ■ -x i a - �yPrp,N iY6lx R1 `''',,,yA wv -esa9 _ 1Wi_ `� ixoxeais. �'`,°'""°�j'pl' �� •� J`e _ o y. T / - - 2 e else [ '4 -sj, . Fairview Southdale Emergency :,6` ..�v, /�.. -. ,� .. - ----._ • ••�. ^ '.-.. SP7RAL 5Tt5 T �� _ r^. T Center a: ,�� I -i I' ��3�/' �/ Expansion �1 r - /�. II 1 t PDNO (--' 1 RE A Lv GRASS I I s EAAB [ C0. CONCRETE WALKWAY -6 'I ;. �'. wN @7 -vb9 ruxcalc pyl.'+ — I E 'A I ew1FRAnCE AVENUE e^' m,:s S as Sr f M`en 7,/ {t I _ IPPER LEVEL® 'An,,,, 8t '�{.,� { sdtX EO9+A.laraESOrA ®D'+- ] (4K CLASS ENTRANCE n/ S� �� 99 PJ 5, J - .GRASS �; ♦ i 1I 9�P�cE N �... �. ��.• � j � �BBP I I i T A 1 t�OdS / 4 FAIRVIEW SOUTHOALE HOSPITAL �p 640/ FRANCE AVENUES BITU) NOUS xo o,W NOP=e]I.5 • b' / I� 861.0 TCH LIKE -SEES TC11 iTOPveal.6 me.D O TOP 4.1 DEMOLITION NOTES: KEY NOTES 1.UTUZE GOPNUi STATE ONECALL 9Te1EL O1ffiP73?IIBS NNQIR9 ]. COOPOPIATEOpR11PilONKPEDESTRWNANO VEMILUMTRKFC QPROIEGT ®SALVAGE FIAGPOUE ANp 1IDN9TALL AT RONOVE TREE5IWIID �I.. XO]`NQ ,SGb11300 PNgi TO= FOW@lOAM'EMAVATSW. WRN OVAE0. I�. 2OIXUiPWOUxOERGROUH ppE BXOWNATAPPROMw.1E aCNSS MLLST BF TAwEN OIWNOreP191RUCWON TO PPOSECT SURVEV ®BASVCUT EIVSTWOPAVFYEM IOGTR)N APPRDVED BY OYMEA r�sii�sorrus. TPa�9.AU Ex6mSO OUTUmF9 WVNOVB¢BHOWN. WI BE MMUYFNTBAMO PROPEi1TY MONa QREAgVE1PMIN POs! ®PeOVDE HTEYPORARI'NEIWRTATEOGTGN REMOVE CURB ISSUE GATE: APRs N. MIS CONSTIIUCeDN FF1D VFNFYIOrhiAN OFUTUTE9TXAT WYBE NPACSEO BYCO16TRUCIXIH. P. PR0IEGlALLTREES NOT 9PECFIGILY OF9fiATEDFmSImIDVAL QRFILC TEHMMNT ��' �`�UTMry �-- `� -+-a- iTE Q SALVAGE W WDSOCII.WD RETIIW TO W.MR S. PROVOETENPOPARY ROIX CONSe1UC11011 EgTATN1IfIf igH9 10.8AWCUT PAVEIAEM THAT RFY 9ATREMWK WRS. QREIAOVEeIOY REMOVE PAVEpeNT EMOLITION NNEREC— TRULTONTMFFlCEN1fRSPUBUCRMOWAV. ® REMOVE 6EWER STRUCNIiE PEBTORE OR REPAUS DARAGED ROAOB WAUa CURBa UTSTEA Q REMOVE UCIRPUE LAN �. STORM 6fwER INLEIB LIUei BE PROTEOIED VAxSaT FFANE BAIf ORPW,T WIEALLLBTO CONDRION EOUALTDtli BETiFRTWI CXEO4OROTIEREOUwAIFM ASEOAO9 MNISPERYAPFWIOPgpID PRESOH91W1COONCOIAOANAN0 A9 REONRED BY O•vxFli. © NOVE OENEMTORTOLOGTLIVW ®REMWESTDNE WALL RflAJYE NIBDBIG cavEn a EsrAmisffn. el16DWGAODl11011 eAtEMENr ®RELOGTE EnsiwDTRABX COwAnDR BAw wrLWE n.cooRDWATE DfWUPIPW of Unurv¢awcovnnLV.vNER.uwr — .... —_..- S.RIOVLIBTRAFFIC FICINACCDRO1 WITXTNENWP890TA SERWrEOCJSUPTION TOTNE9 APPROYID BYOwxE.ti ® SfEARCXOECNMLWUMNGS FOR I®gALyAGEBWEMCNANO RETURN TOOWNER MANUALOF UNOURCTMFFICCONTIt0. OEVY:ES, INCUAN DA BUUDINO,DEMOUWDH TREE PROTELTON TEMPORMY TRAFFlC CONTROLIDHEIAYOURFIELD NANVAL DATED 611E PLAN APPUGTION FFBI{UARY MII. ATALLTWE9 THAT WiSRU 1OMNIGTN1V OlUUPIG ®RESIOVE RETANWO WALL TMFFq; @� THE PIIOJECT SRE Ala? PUBUL ROPDWAYS. MAMAN TVA t t' WIDE IAHE9 fORACCE59 TOAMBULANCE GMGE ,THE6ISSBIRDUIGND ®RENO�IE w000 FENCE PAANYA BTRLV`IUREATALLTOR:a 100 tQ RPIOVE GTE CAROIENfR 1 w DUNMAMP2I 81 EAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion - .rwwoeA— same FD�YiWlEAOTA NO: '-1- LADE -- 2,.91] BASEMENT LEVEL OVERALL PLAN WarE ruxavnuranuu A200 W OUNHAMPI cu FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion �o� mu+�•vE+nESa.x Ynwu- wYSO,. � XMND: ?506Yt SOO nsvewre rmaY�, xoiY FIRST LEVEL OVERALL PLAN 1b a, lw �0MALL HRSr LEVEL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL FL00R PLAN b A210 W Q- OVERALL SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A220 DUNHAMPI o8 FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion we, molts �vDNE swrH EnNA uwrvESOr� nw w: am. asue ogre: •vnnza, zo,a SECOND LEVEL OVERALL PLAN cre a—u—N 'IA AIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL 6401 FRANCE AVENUE S. ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN - PHOTOMETRICS �Q., o. = - 1111 L, 11 L DUNHAM GENERAL NOTES: MEAiRviEw Fairview Southdale. Emergency Center Expansion CONS 140 ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN - PHOTOMETRICS sff--- E102 .1 .0 '0. 'u 1. 1.0 'W '0.6 *u % 'w h, 'lA NA 'N 'IA AIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL 6401 FRANCE AVENUE S. ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN - PHOTOMETRICS �Q., o. = - 1111 L, 11 L DUNHAM GENERAL NOTES: MEAiRviEw Fairview Southdale. Emergency Center Expansion CONS 140 ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN - PHOTOMETRICS sff--- E102 A WSBInfrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning m Construction - & Associates, Inc. Memorandum DATE: May 14, 2013 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE: Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -38 Background 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed expansion of the Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center would have on the existing hospital parking, site circulation and the adjacent roadway system. The site is located in the southeast quadrant of TH 62 and France Avenue. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed plan includes the expansion of the emergency center, urgent care, behavioral health and observation area. The proposed expansion consists of a 77,500 sf (gross area), two - story building located on the north side of the existing hospital building. Existing access to this area of the hospital is from 65th Street at two access locations. No modification to the access planned with the expansions project. However the ring road is planned to be modified to include a new roundabout that will accommodate the new expansion and provide improved circulation and access to the 6363 building and the east parking ramp. The proposed site plan including the ring road improvements is shown in Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed site expansion were evaluated at the following locations. • France Avenue at 66th Street • France Avenue at 65th Street • 65th Street at Hospital Driveway • 65th Street at Drew Avenue • 66th Street at Drew Avenue The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. A3-7 FSH— Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 2 of 15 Existing Traffic Characteristics The existing lane configuration and traffic control include: France Avenue (CSAH 17) is north/south a 6 -lane divided Arterial roadway from south of 66th Street to north of 65th Street. Primary access to York Avenue is by local streets and development driveways. The posted speed limit on France Avenue in the vicinity of the site is 40 mph. 66th Street (CSAH 53) is an east /west 4 -lane divided Minor Arterial roadway. Street access and access to adjacent developments including the Southdale Shopping Center is provided from this roadway. The speed limit posted on 66th Street is 35 mph. 65th Street 65th Street is an east /west City street with numerous access driveways. The existing roadway configuration includes a single lane in each direction. All the driveway access points are controlled with stop signs, stopping the exiting movements from the developments. A 30 mph speed limit is posted on this roadway. Drew Avenue is a north/south City street with numerous access driveways. The existing roadway configuration between 66th Street and 65th Street includes a single lane in each direction with a continuous center left turn lane (three lane section). All the driveway access points are controlled with stop signs, stopping the exiting movements from the developments. A 30 mph speed limit is posted on this roadway. Drew Avenue north of 65th Street is a two -lane street providing access around the hospital. Access to the Fairview Southdale parking ramp and several hospital related uses is provided from this roadway.. The lane configurations at each of the study area intersection are as follows: France Avenue at 66th Street — Traffic Signal Control SB France Ave approaching 66th St — one right/through, two through, one left NB France Ave approaching 66th St — one right, three through, one left EB 66th St approaching France Ave — one right, two through, one left WB 66th St approaching France Ave — one right, two through, two left France Avenue at 65th Street — Traffic Signal Control SB France Ave approaching 65th St — one right/through, two through, one left NB France Ave approaching 65th St — one right/through, two through, one left EB 65th St approaching France Ave — one right /through, one left WB 65th St approaching France Ave — one right, one through/left 65th Street at Hospital Driveway — Side Street Stop SB Hospital Driveway approaching 65th St — one right/through/left EB 65th St approaching Hospital Driveway — one right/through/left WB 65th St approaching Hospital Driveway - one right/through/left A 3g FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 3 of 15 65th Street at Drew Avenue - Side Street Stop SB Drew Ave approaching 65th St — one right, one through/left NB Drew Ave approaching 65th St — one right/through, one left EB 65th St approaching Drew Ave — one right /through/left WB 65th St approaching Drew Ave — one right /through/left 66th Street at Drew Avenue /Southdale Center Access — Traffic Signal Control SB Drew Ave approaching 66th St — one right/through, one left NB Southdale Center Access approaching 66th St — inbound lanes only EB 66th St approaching Drew Ave — one right, two through, one left WB 65th St approaching France Aver one right /through, two through, one left AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts and daily hourly approach counts were conducted during the week on April 1, 2013. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. Figure 3 shows the existing intersections and driveways along each corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study, with the existing 2013 AM and PM peak hour and traffic volumes. The traffic count data is included in the Appendix. Background (Non Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions (2012) and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. However, in order to account for some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period was used to project traffic to the 2014 and 2030 analysis years. In addition to the regional background traffic, other specific none development related traffic was determined and included with the overall background traffic. Edina Medical Plaza (6500 France Avenue) — The City recently approved the redevelopment of the properties in the southwest quadrant of France Avenue and 65' Street. The proposed site included redevelopment of both the 6500 France Avenue site and the 4005 65th Avenue site with a five story 96,500 sf medical office building with an attached 3 story parking structure. However, recently the City was presented a revised site plan changing the use on the site to a 209 unit senior housing and skilled care facility. With this change, it is assumed that this project will not be open and will not be included with 2014 analysis but, will be fully developed and included in the 2030 background traffic. Southdale Residential - The City recently approved the addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking lot. The site is located in the northwest quadrant of 69th Street and York Avenue. It is assumed that this project will not be open and included as part of the 2014 analysis but, will be fully leased and included in the 2030 background traffic. 431 FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 4 of 15 Additional Southdale Mall Development - Based on the information received from Southdale Center about the current vacancy rates and plans for renovations, it was determined that following the renovations, the mall would have an additional 143,880 sf of leasable space available. This figure includes leasable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all leasable space will be occupied by 2014 and included in the background traffic for the 2014 and 2030 analysis. Future Restaurant Development —. A future restaurant is proposed in northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 691h Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 sf in size with approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will not be developed by 2014 but, will be open and included and included as part of the 2030 background traffic. The estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation rates used to estimate the additional development traffic is based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition. The table shows the AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. Table 1- Estimated Additional. Background Trip Generation Use Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Senior Housing/Skilled 209 units 42 15 27 53 29 24 Apartments 232 units 118 24 94 144 94 50 Shopping Center 143,880 sf 138 86 52 533. 256 277 Restaurant 8000 sf 87 48 39 79 47 32 Total New Trips 385 173 212 1 809 426 383 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Site Expansion Trip Generation The trip generation used to estimate the proposed additional site traffic was calculated two ways: (1) Using traffic generation rated from similar land use (i.e. hospital) as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, and; (2) Based on data provided by the hospital on annual and average peak visits to the emergency room and urgent care facilities. �� FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 5 of 15 Determining the traffic generation using the existing site conditions was based on data provided by the hospital from November 2011 through August 2012. During this time frame for the emergency room there was an average of 3 visits in the AM peak hour and an average of 7 visits in the PM peak hour. For the urgent care facility, at the peak, there were 7 visits per hour. Currently the urgent care does not operate during the AM peak hour. Each of these visits represents two trips, one in and one out. It is proposed that there will be a10% increase in services with the proposed expansion and that the urgent care would be operating during the AM peak hour. This will result in an increase of 16 trips in the AM peak hour (assuming a peek condition for the urgent care) and 4 trips in the PM peak hour. The estimated trip generation from the proposed Fairview Southdale Hospital expansion is shown below in Table 2. Table 2 - Estimated Expansion Trip Generation — ITE Rates Use Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Emergency Room 2 1 1 2 1 1 Urgent Care Facility 14 7 7 2 1 1 1 Hospital Uses (l) 20, 820 sf 20 13 7 20 8 12 Total Expansion 36 21 15 24 10 14 (1) - Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Traffic Distribution Background and site - generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve the area. In general the Trip Distribution was assumed: • 30% to the north • 40% to the south • 15% to the east • 15% to the west. Additional background trips were distributed to 65th Street, 66th Street or France Avenue based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. The generated trips for the proposed Fairview Southdale Hospital expansion were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on 65th Street and circulate using the existing Drew Avenue ring road. These trips were assigned based on the ratio of existing traffic patterns on each respective roadway. FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 6 of 15 Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2014 which is the year after the proposed expansion would'be completed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. Three improvement alternatives were evaluated. 1. Existing — Assuming existing lane configurations and traffic control 2. No Build — Assuming existing lane configurations and traffic control without the hospital expansion 3. Build — Assuming existing lane configuration and traffic control with the hospital expansion. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non - development background traffic growth to the existing 2013 traffic counts to determine the "No- Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated Fairview Southdale Hospital expansion traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 4— 7 shows the projected 2014 and 2030 No -Build and Build AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Operations Existing and /or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the impacted intersections and access driveway adjacent to the hospital. The analysis was conducted for the following scenarios. 1. Existing 2013 Conditions 2. Projected 2014 No Build 3. Projected 2014 Build 4. Projected 2030 No Build 5. Projected 2030 Build This section describes the methodology used to assess, the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. Analysis Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. A-�—� FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 7 of 15 LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign - controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long - queues and /or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through- street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un- signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The threshold LOS values for un- signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low - volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. L3 . Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un- Signalized A < 10 < 10 B 10 -20 10 -15 C 20 -35 15 -25 D 35-55 25-35 E 55-80 35-50 F >80 >50 Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low - volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. L3 FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 8 of 15 The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. Existinz Level of Service Summary Table 4, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operating at an overall LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours with all movements operating at LOS E or better. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. Table 4 - Existing Level of Service Intersection AM Peak hour PM Peak Hour LOS Overall Delay sec /veh LOS Overall Delay sec /veh France Ave at 65th Street C (D) 20.1 C (E) 21.5 France Ave at 66`" Street C (D) 23.0 C (D) 26.1 65`h Street at Hospital Driveway A (B) 4.5 A (C) 6.2 65th Street at Drew Avenue A (B) 6.9 A (B) 5.6 66`h Street at Drew Avenue C (D) 24.4 C (D) 24.8 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2014 which is the year after the proposed Southdale Hospital expansion would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5 and 6. Detailed tables showing the LOS and delays by approach are included in the Appendix. gq FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 9 of 15 Table 5 — Forecasted No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existin conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the major intersections on France Avenue at 65t Street and 66th Street and on 66th Street at Drew Avenue /Southdale entrance. By 2030 the analysis indicates that at the intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue potential issues on the 65th Street approaches and France Avenue left turns may exist. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. . Table 5 — Forecasted No Build Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 — Forecasted Build with Hospital Expansion, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours with some movements at LOS E. Similar to the Forecasted No -Build conditions the intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue will have potential delay issues. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. In addition the intersection of 65th Street and the Hospital Entrance will experience increased delays, although they do not indicate a need for potential mitigation. 5 2014 2030 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Overall Overall Overall Overall LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay sec /veh sec /veh sec /veh sec /veh France Ave at 65th St C (D) 20.5 C (E) 22.8 C (D) 23.7 D (E) 37.4 France Ave at 66th St C (D) 23.1 C (D) 26.3 C (D) 23.5 C (E) 32.8 65th St at Hospital A (B) 4.5 A (B) 7.5 A (C) 5.1 C (D) 14.4 Driveway 65th St at Drew Ave A (B) 7.0 A(B) 5.6 A (B) 1 7.5 A(B) 6.1 66th St at Drew Ave C (D) 24.5 C (D) 24.9 C (D) 26.5 C (D) 27.3 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 — Forecasted Build with Hospital Expansion, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours with some movements at LOS E. Similar to the Forecasted No -Build conditions the intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue will have potential delay issues. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. In addition the intersection of 65th Street and the Hospital Entrance will experience increased delays, although they do not indicate a need for potential mitigation. 5 FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 10 of 15 Table 6 — Forecast Build with Hospital Expansion Intersection 2014 2030 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Overall Delay sec /veh LOS Overall Delay sec /veh LOS Overall Delay sec /veh LOS Overall Delay sec /veh France Ave at 65`h Street C (D) 20.5 C (E) 23.3 C (D) 23.7 D (E) 37.4 France Ave at 66`h Street C (D) 23.1 C (D) 26.6 C (D) 24.0 C (E) 35.0 65'h Street at Hospital Driveway A (C) 4.7 A (D) 7.9 A (C) - 5.1 C (D) 21.8 65'h Street at Drew Ave A (B) 7.1 A(B) 5.6 A (B) 7.5 A(B) 6.1 66th Street at Drew Ave C (D) 24.8 C (D) 24.9 C (D) 26.5 C (D) 27.3 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Vehicle Oueuina Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2014 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at the intersections in the study area. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, and future no- build and build 2014 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases however, for the 2030 no -build and build conditions, the maximum queues were exceeded, specifically; on 65th Street between France Avenue and the hospital entrance. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were typically identified one or two times during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 4 to 6 seconds. The potential future mitigation at the 65th Street and France Avenue intersection discussed above will improve the flow of traffic on 65th Street and also minimize traffic blocking the hospital entrance. Additional signage could also be added indicating "do not block intersection" and /or "no left turns during peak hours" at the hospital entrance should this become an issue. Tables showing the average and maximum queue lengths by movement and approach are included in the Appendix. ✓If_ FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 11 of 15 Parking Impact Analysis The parking impacts to the existing Fairview Southdale Hospital and Medical office buildings were analyzed based on the current use of the site and anticipated growth. Table 7 below shows a summary of the existing parking available on the site. Currently there are two primary parking structures and surface spaces located throughout the site. These locations are shown in Figure 2. Table 7 —Available Parking Location Existing Spaces Proposed Spaces West Parking Ramp 1.018 1018 East Parking Ramp 975 975 Surface Spaces 74 58 Total Parking Spaces 2067 2051 'In order to provide a base line of the parking demand for the site, the existing parking was counted. Table 8 shows the average and peak number of occupied spaces throughout the site. Table 8 — Parking Use Counter! Location Average Occupied Spaces Peak Occupied Spaces West Parking Ramp 1455 1690 East Parking Ramp Surface Spaces 40 58 Total Parking Spaces 1495 1748 Based on the City Code the Fairview Southdale Hospital site would require approximately 2575 parking spaces. If it is assumed that the site will have a 10% increase in staff as a result of the expansion, the site would require 2728. In both case a parking variance is required for site would require 6747total spaces requiring a variance for 524 and 677 respectively. Table 9 shows the required parking based on the City Code. 4 47 FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 12 of 15 Table 9 — Parking Required per City Code Use Existing Parking Proposed Parking Hospital 1525 Emp Re ui red 1678 Emp Required 6405 Medical Office 326 Beds 192 326 Beds 192 Hospital 1525 Em 1851 1678 Emp 2004 Total Parking Spaces Required 54,248 sf 1 1704 54,248 sf 1831 6405 Medical Office 49 Doc /Dent 320 49 Doc/Dent 320 69,442 sf 69,442 sf 6363 Medical Office 56 Doc/Dent 404 56 Doc/Dent 1 404 Total Parking Spaces Required I 2575 1 2728 The parking demand for the site was also estimated based on the parking demand surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4`y' Edition. Table 10 below shows a summary of each uses and what the anticipated peak parking demand would be for a typical weekday. This would represent the worst case condition for the parking on the site assuming the existing and proposed uses. Based on this analysis, the existing parkingprequired is very similar to the peak occupied spaces counted. Table 10 — Parking Demand per ITE Use Existing ReParking quired Proposed Required Hospital 1525 Emp 1266 1678 Emp 1393 6405 Medical Office 54,248 sf 192 54,248 sf 192 6363 Medical Office 69,442 sf 246 69,442 sf 246 Total Parking Spaces Required 1 1704 1831 Based on the above parking summary, there is and would be sufficient parking available on site for the proposed Fairview Southdale expansion. 4K FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 13 of 15 Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The .proposed Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion project includes the expansion of the emergency center, urgent care, behavioral health and observation area. The site is anticipated to generate an additional 36 trips in the AM peak hour and 24 trips in the PM peak hour. • Additional trips will be generated from other approved or anticipated development in the surrounding area. These uses will generate an additional 385 trips in the AM peak hour and 809 trips in the PM peak hour. • Existing traffic operations at the intersections and driveways in the study area on 65tth Street and 66th Street are all operating at overall LOS D or better for the both the AM and PM peak hours. • Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2014 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the AM and PM peak hours. However, some movements, specifically at the 65th Street and France Avenue intersection will be operating at LOS E. By 2030 the analysis indicates that at the intersection may have potential issues on the 65th Street approaches and France Avenue left turns. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane lengths and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C. Intersection traffic operations for the Forecasted Build alternative (with the Hospital Expansion traffic) in 2014 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. Similar to the Forecasted No -Build conditions the intersection of 65`h Street and France Avenue may have potential delay issues. With the minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C. The results of the queuing analysis found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, and future no -build and build 2014 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases however, for the 2030 no -build and build conditions, the maximum queues were exceeded, specifically; on 65th Street between France Avenue and the hospital entrance. The potential future mitigation at the 65th Street and France Avenue intersection will improve the flow of traffic on 65th Street and also minimize traffic blocking the hospital entrance. Additional signage could also be added at the hospital entrance should this become an issue. 44 FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 14 of 15 The existing or proposed available parking does not or will not meet the City's Code. A With the current and proposed Hospital Expansion, 2728 parking spaces would be required based on City Code. The current plan provides for 2051 parking spaces. This would require a variance for 677 parking spaces. • Based on the parking count and the ITE parking generation estimates the total parking required for the Fairview Southdale Hospital site would range between 1750 and 1850 spaces. With this estimate, no parking variance would be required. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Provide the proposed roadway internal roadway improvements as shown on the proposed site plan (Figure 2). 2. Although no improvements to the France Avenue at 65`h Street intersection are specifically required at this time. Should delays and queuing become an issue in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 3. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion project. A5_0 FSH — Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina May 14, 2013 Page 15 of 15 APPENDIX 45--t of 0 ,n 0 N m D w 4 0 32nd ST. ST. w w a a ST. 'J -J a a 1w �D Z _ J 1�11 � h ST. ZA w �I • �I r r VI W J v N z u R G /y7 A Q EW a > l CH OWEN < } a Cq v~ R a CU I�RVE Q ❑❑ D, W. 62 nd U ST. a A W. 62 nd a z a CA• 3 Q a a 6ARRI SO,V w ow w 6 a 35. CA_ > U a a °�/ 0 700 ft aoo f 35. ° � 36• J a a x _ ��l_/ o w > � w > vx J o v m W- 64 th ST. a 64 th ST. a [MINNESOTA A z o W. 64th p r J U > a • W. ••' a Project Location th a • sst S. J rll U� o S T. T Z rO Z1 O z J O U • 3 • a w • w W ■ fY UJ } � Lake a� m ° •S a z z W. 66th : ■ T. e r � z N Q rA �IYTON T. 69th ST. LARf ASPgS to TR f� Creek 39. HIBISC o Of 'r Cornelia ° SOUT Study Area w ynp P6VNa _1 a Rnvre %Ja ` aR' 8 th ST. BALFANZ o ti L11 Q R. z RD. ���.� �/� ❑u(� a IE o DUDS ON r o LA. 2 II 0RD WAY w �� ,4 z c� �O J��ul W. 69th ST. Q ' Z Q L J Q Q' OQ 000000 C�tieERRY W, W. a o -d- w OJ J 0 70th o > a w ST. o ANDOVER RD- -, MAVELL E w Z m J tail a C-0 C BEL VIDERE LA, o w ° DR, RO IAR�y J _ o HAZELTON ° OR C W ASPASIA E CIR, CARE Y of a o C -R pUNygM ppN ko W. c� _ °' 72 nd ST. -- 9 w pR. p' � o � a 'tRTH DR. w C/;OD Q a o 4 p w J 0� J p > pNDELL DR. w 0 a z w x Cr w PHLOX GILFORD DR. 3 0 z Li Of LE F1 w a L ❑w X �X LA. a JU o° 4th Lake HIBISCUS a a ¢ PARKLAVYN w AVE. w ST. ST. AVE. 0 Edina � �pUM 0 �� 0 0 W. 75th � ° SSA ° Pp �P PLAZA r w QOP AY RE �e G DR. a a Y th ST. Z 5 N 3 BLVD. W. a J w O � Y � W X Q O X ST. 77th d Cn \ \\ ° w � w a ° MINNESOTA D� VIKING w DR. � o d �r o -•- U Traffic and Parking Study Figure 1 e Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion �.� City of Edina, Minnesota Project Location Map � sI� / /a�'�.0 I 1 I C� CC' I�.m, ow.rorxomsn j c i Ci T Ej FAIRVIEW FWM— '1 �i/j• - _ t- rae _._ ICr Emerge \\ C 7 IC °e LiC'i•'(iu_ j\ — 5 , PLAN SRE :o B rr�� Plus n C am s s:r w C300 <� Traffic and Parking Study Figure 2 e F Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion �.. ®- City of Edina, Minnesota Proposed Site Plan Asa f.i i. LEGEND 4 -'- Thru -Stop Intersection 1 1 .. OSignalized Intersection - Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area 1 c m '!•N + 102(103) MINNESOTA ® All -Way Stop Intersection s.' -. h. t 1 �•S,� �' � pp � • t 262(303) e h liter Intersection Lane Geometry 179 ( 376) _ 16(,x,, � �' . AM (PM) Turning m � + /3(96J « N + 187(350) j ,0'('0') Movement Volumes _ 711 V 50 ( 511) •f" 11 ( 12) (131) 73 -0 •j ttr► 4 IS ( 24) 63 + t, ( 93)196 (148) 346 -�+ (108) 37 � (82) 208 11 ('.. 1� L ' I w °mss' 1i -'•'' " 111,11'.1 \. 31_�►1,. : � %. . � (100) 61 k '; ...i_ (354)200 y 1 H't 16, r - .a_ - ^'. .Itt'I Flil '1 llc.:. A S� i. 1•rr `11411 �, •yy4•. 1 4 -'- 1 1 .. _ ■ _'4 - - 1 c m '!•N + 102(103) t 154(299) 't s.' -. h. t 1 �•S,� �' � pp � 32(28) t t 262(303) 45)139 1 �► v Ir 111 n, r 241 224 ( 62)108 + - 1 79 90 ( ) J L S f 1 (100) 61 4 1 . (354)200 y 1 H't 16, r - .a_ - ^'. .Itt'I Flil '1 llc.:. !ice 1„ 153 ( 46) 't •' - �" '. 4 N .� � 4- 4- 675 (757) %L C 38 (120) �` •,�` •. �_ "' 30) 52 J e o Kam, (727)254 y Traffic and Parking Study Figure 3 Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina, Minnesota Existing Conditions A S� LEGEND (111 Thru -Stop Intersection Signalized Intersection .V rt Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area :.11 •,* t41NNE5o7A �, " °`� All -Way Stop Intersection w may" �+.-- �,,._�..� ..a. r • �' i► '3�^ F • �1 Intersection Lane Geometry 162(384) ( t 16(15) ; ' AM(PM)Turning M 100(200) + 44 ( 98) H + 797 (358) _ Movement Volumes =t- •il! {{ 51( 52) - �► N 11(12) + (134) 75 .0 W, 11� � ► ' - p� �� n _ _ (95)200 ,^�; (152)354► o m = •• St.. s.. # (110)38iy ^t (841212 ilk• 14 '*r �•. _ 1.'V,.i1.' �tt< 1;67• �;•,•,,� �� ') f - .S i■ i JFfi,.r': a. 4. i 1 + 102 (103) 1 i _ R 157(285) � F-. !111:7 __- _ $.�S � �' •/ P�N 32(28) w m ^ r 267(315) RIM'!,a• tt T1� (45)139 Ij f► •e J row + -* ilt i{ i 246 (229) : �. C 1 • � (62)106 + '• _ .1 �.} ff'' Jt 11'1'1•' �•.8 „r� % (81) 92 -0 Ij ttt' i ji i, �6 (100) 61 361 20a -• .„ FI • ,:F �_ t. •e Iu 111 In ( ) -► t t.- F - ^ .4 IUr•IC r'!<ilt ( 87) 39 1 _ + !•' 11 i> • .}� .: pM1 e rr. all 153(461 t1 ♦ , '' r. ,., ° •'-' 675(757) i w 1 4; 675(757) 4 or 38 (120) 1 (727)254 y o c A. Traffic and Parking Study Figure 4 Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion v ar° ay • 4,�e�..•• City of Edina, Minnesota 2014 No Build Conditions A LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection OSignalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area 't'MINNESOIA� All -Way Stop Intersection a n1e, Intersection Lane Geometry 1a7(3s8J r _ 18(15) AM (PM) Turning + 44(98) + 196(363) . 100(200) Movement Volumes .ill 4 56 ( 557) + 11 ( 12) (134) 75 tt 1► ( 26) 68 w�► 1.1.. ( 95) 200 ,^„ (151) 363 + ° '• 110) 38 (84)212 • I 1; , y 1 I/•1 _ - 23 ( 8) a!e + 102 (103) ry.. t 1s7(285) r. 'hs8 __.�� ^� J '!•N 32(28) �� 9 2fi7(315) Ilr ✓;1 (^ Sf+ is �t I ., A'111V1- 6= ..✓ ^ (45)139 •ijj iI 249(232) �• I_'V (62)108+ J ^m 1. 83) 95 ti .A + (100) fit (361)204 4 ,* 6 , . 1 t 153(46) ♦ y o 675(757) ti Ir 38 (120) 30) 52 @" • ' r G- ( 727) 254 „�,• (571 24 "fi — �•'. 9 \! Traffic and Parking Study Figure 5 F� e ly Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina, Minnesota 2014 Build Conditions LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection OSignalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area t MINNESOTA � , �,. 'r•• ® All Way Stop Intersection wi1ir Intersection Lane Geometry P 17 g 208(436) r ' 20( 17) Lrs AM (PM) Turning r + 50(111) N ° 100(200) Movement Volumes � 11 58( 59) + 13 (14) (152) 85 J q t ♦♦ ( 26) 69 (108)227 (174)405 ;+ ( 125) 43 95)241 -I `•luli':Y-11�1`� 4' tw''a1L.- `!r. � ` 4 '— ...,.i> #1� •.- tom. :. �� +]��+f�( '��. :7 � t�F %'Y'1 y •.a Ilb 11) 23( 81 >R ° 102 (103) 4L 179 (3Z4) i�11�7 �y -- -- -- SI•r= 32(28) .. e _ •~- 304(358) 11jP'-! (45)139 4 r 2e0(260) I.t. ': - - (62)108 1 i1� ( 92)104 J i i ! 100) 61 - - 14 ~ (411)232 4r s �w o� A I- 153 ( 46) 4 • '- 675(757) s i YY r 36(120) .. 4 5♦ �." - ` ` - .* t • • ' � ,� � 0 J 1 52 r \ ti .•��� ♦ .t^ a " ~i % ( 727) 254 +. `^ `�,:+ `` 1� 1}. _. i `j, ! f ',>\ ;s ,• ry F !`xA (s7) z4 ti 41��! k �t Traffic and Parking Study Figure 6 ° e o Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 No Build Conditions ASS LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection rt, O Signalized Intersection Signalized Intersection t�, Outside Study Area At t MIN "ESOUw ® All Way Stop Intersection Intersection Lane Geometry o^� $ 213(490) 1 1 20( 17) ,« AM (PM) Turning + S0(111) n . + 224(413) 100(200) Movement Volumes ill � 53 ( 6411 �► 13 ( 14 ) 4 e (152) 05 1 fj 11� w128) 74 + ► i� ( 28) 74 g y (108) 227 (179) 419 + (125) 43 Q (95) 241 , •� ^ 23( 8) =� T m -+ 102 (10 179(324) `''�.4r11 M - - -.r� 32 ( 2& ) - v N 358 11' 304 ' "' ! I ^ 6A - a ^r e o ( ) A IUS`I r (45)139 fj f► Ye 11, ill 1 283(263) t�.!" FI •r .141 '� t° :` (62)108 ► ttA u s " (94)107 ..,. -!.. - -.! 1 ■ �, (100) 61 -► rH+}r.� r xz f>r 4u of '21 (411)232 -► 1 - :: "� ,7 ,bf•1. 9'lFnl'le•:7i�i 99) 44 !._f,1a,•d� w�•,r�.m 'i 11. 4. w, h 153 ( 46) y- .d N14 11 or 38(120) ( 727) 254 57 24 Z _. J r t ti� �13A..1T k ° Traffic and Parking Study Figure 7 ° e o Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 Build Conditions As- LEGEND .•t Thru -Stop Intersection Signalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area (MINNESOTA -'�� "1 All -Way Stop Intersection ntr Intersection Lane Geometry 4. 213( +40) 29(17) AM (PM) Turning ti 50(111) +� 224(413) .; ,00(200) Movement Volumes dii ti or 63( 64) �► 13(,4) _ (152) 85 ./ Ij 11 } f r R' ffi� f f" 3 f � (28) 74 + (109)227 (179)414 + _= - � f (125) 43 — _ — ! (95)241 ~ - »mill to i, V it •i r �.vyy 1 -' .T jt I riF7 t =:T f 1' ir. T ,1 X111 it l• n 1 23( a) A + 102(103) _ e t 119(324) �N 32(28) .. pp H 304(356) 1 1 `^ 6� ,.-• ( ) 1 i.. 95 139 r P dii it r 283 (263) 62)106 -{+ m i 1 1 ��f { 94)107 r ( ,� 1 !'� (100) 61 — ( 1 -1 .IL�ti.1 , .,�� {{1 , t; �a u1 111�(s•1 (411)232 ,..� I )1 �' � : �` �3 It" .. f 11 r•e ,'glli ��= •r9i!i ( 99) 44 ti � .. t ` I iIAI .• �'. •� ryR_.q ' 15317E � 7 •i_ a +L r •'�. .., ~ 675(757) ) t4 r 38 (120) ` » `v �� , •, y` / N +i- + ^ I �, r r o 0 s *5 v . z a ..,. •.. • �., (727) 254 y % _ LE_ :it, Ab �r a Traffic and Parking Study Figure 8 r e o Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center Expansion 2030 Build Conditions FJ �y City of Edina, Minnesota With Mitigated Lane Geometry A`�_1 .=rance Ave & 65th St 6:30 -9:30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 30's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN ('�rniinc Printarl_ I Inchiftari File Name : france ave & 65th st Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page No : 1 07:00 AM 19 France Ave From North 48 0 65th St From East 29 3 France Ave From South 0 33 65th St From West 77 14 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Tofu Right Thru Left Peds A . anal Ri ht Thru Left Peds A . Tool Ri ht Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 06:30 AM 06745 AM 35 40 63 61 0 72 84 0 159 196 10 15 4 1 0 4 4 0 15 23 8 15 41 17 0 72 19 0 66 106 2 2 17 4 0 32 5 0 23 39 263 364 Total 75 135 145 0 355 25 8 5 0 38 23 113 36 0 172 4 49 9 0 62 627 07:00 AM 19 93 48 0 160 29 3 1 0 33 12 77 14 0 . 103 6 35 14 0 55 351 07:15 AM 27 132 68 0 227 33 8 3 0 44 23 76 20 0 119 3 43 20 0 66 456 07:30 AM 18 134 56 0 208 45 12 2 0 59 18 93 34 0 145 9 42 13 0 64 476 07:45 AM 19 172 64 0 255 36 13 5 0 54 29 115 34 0 178 4 54 15 0 73 560 Total 83 531 236 0 850 143 36 11 0 190 82 361 102 0 545 22 174 62 0 258 1843 08:00 AM 19 143 51 0 213 38 15 5 0 58 20 116 25 0 161 9 52 11 0 72 504 08:15 AM 26 173 54 0 253 52 13 15 0 80 26 124 27 1 178 6 50 22 0 78 589 08:30 AM 24 161 58 0 243 54 12 15 0 81 30 123 13 0 166 13 51 21 0 85 575 08:45 AM 21 156 54 0 231 49 9 19 0 77 35 139 16 0 190 9 35 13 1 58 556 Total 90 633 217 0 940 193 49 54 0 296 111 502 81 1 695 37 188 67 1 293 2224 09:00 AM 23 195 55 0 273 61 18 12 0 91 32 141 16 0 189 9 24 17 0 50 603 09:15 AM 26 157 60 0 243 60 10 13 1 84 33 137 14 0 184 8 36 21 0 65 576 Total 49 352 115 0 516 1 121 28 25 1 175 65 278 30 0 373 1 17 60 38 0 115F 1179 03:30 PM 14 171 44 0 2291 98 30 15 1431 15 241 19 0 275 24 45 39 0 1070 03:45 PM 11 190 29 0 230 100 29 19 10 149 27 268 15 0 3101 20 25 25 0 759 Total 1 25 361 73 0 459 1 198 59 34 1 2921 42 509 34 0 5851 44 70 64 0 1781 1514 04:00 PM 14 163 34 0 211 100 26 20 0 146 10 258 13 0 281 26 29 44 0 99 737 04:15 PM 6 180 24 0 210 83 17 19 2 121 22 270 8 0 300 20 27 31 0 78 709 04:30 PM 6 178 19 0 203 110 .36 14 0 160 14 251 12 0 277 26 26 43 0 95 735 04:45 PM 10 196 27 0 233 92 16 9 0 117 18 309 12 0 339 23 17 26 0 66 755 Total 36 717 104 0 857 385 95 62 2 544 64 1088 45 0 1197 95 99 144 0 338 2936 05:00 PM 6 165 18 0 189 102 25 15 2 144 16 334 10 0 360 38 23 33 0 94 787 05:15 PM 5 197 12 0 214 68 18 12 0 98 19 344 10 0 373 21 18 29 0 68 753 05:30 PM 6 194 12 0 212 56 22 8 0 86 9 274 17 0 300 13 13 19 0 45 643 05:45 PM 5 212 15 0 232 47 3 11 0 61 5 248 11 0 264 8 15 21 0 44 601 Total 22 768 57 0 847 273 68 46 2 389 49 1200 48 0 1297 80 69 102 0 251 2784 06:00 PM 6 168 15 1 190 33 3 1 0 37 6 275 8 0 289 15 12 23 0 50 566 06:15 PM 7 193 17 0 217 51 7 3 0 61 10 289 5 0 304 10 3 15 0 28 610 Grand Total 393 3858 979 1 5231 1422 353 241 6 2022 452 4615 389 1 5457 324 724 524 1 1573 14283 Apprch % 7.5 73.8 18.7 0 70.3 17.5 11.9 0.3 8.3 84.6 7.1 0 20.6 46 33.3 0.1 Total % 2.8 27 6.9 0 36.6 10 2.5 1.7 0 14.2 3.2 32.3 2.7 0 38.2 2.3 5.1 3.7 0 11 00 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 65th St 6:30 -9:30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 30's File Name : france ave & 65th Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:15 AM Int. Total 08:15 AM France Ave From North 65th St From East France Ave From South 65th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App.Tatnl Right ThrU Left Peds App,Tobl Right Thru Left Peds App.ToW Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App,T.W Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:15 AM Int. Total 08:15 AM 26 173 54 0 253 52 13 15 0 80 26 124 27 1 178 6 50 22 0 78 589 08:30 AM 24 161 58 0 243 54 12 15 0 81 30 123 13 0 166 13 51 21 0 85 575 08:45 AM 21 156 54 0 231 49 9 19 0 77 35 139 16 0 190 9 35 13 1 58 556 09:00 AM 23 195 55 0 273 61 18 12 0 91 32 141 16 0 189 9 24 17 0 50 603 Total volume 94 685 221 0 1000 216 52 61 0 329 123 527 72 1 723 37 160 73 1 271 2323 % App. Total 9.4 68.5 22.1 0 65.7 15.8 18.5 0 17 72.9 10 0.1 13.7 59 26.9 0.4 PHF 1 .904 .878 .953 .000 .916 .885 .722 .803 .000 .904 .879 .934 .667 .250 .951 1 .712 .784 .830 .250 .797 .963 � 1. ci France Ave Out In Total 816 Lr 1 1816 941 685 2 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data co J N H 0) C o North —2 N N 5 — Peak Hour Begins at 08:15 AM N co . 'v nshifted r O� m° 41 T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 721 5271 1231 1 783 1 F 1506 Out In Total � 1. ci WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN , =rance Ave & 65th St 6:30 -9:30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 30's File Name : france ave &65th st Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM Int. Total 04:30 PM France Ave From North 65th St From East France Ave From South 65th St From West Start Time Right Thru I Left Peds App.romi Right Thru Left Peds A,, 1,W Right Thru Left Peds App.r,,i Right I Thru Left Peds App.To4l Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM Int. Total 04:30 PM 6 178 19 0 203 110 36 14 0 160 14 251 12 0 277 26 26 43 0 95 735 04:45 PM 10 196 27 0 233 92 16 9 0 117 18 309 12 0 339 23 17 26 0 66 755 05:00 PM 6 165 18 0 189 102 25 15 2 144 16 334 10 0 360 38 23 33 0 94 787 05:15 PM 5 197 12 0 214 68 18 12 0 98 19 344 10 0 373 21 18 29 0 68 753 Total Volume 27 736 76 0 839 372 95 50 2 519 67 1238 44 0 1349 108 84 131 0 323 3030 App. Total 3.2 87.7 9.1 0 71.7 18.3 9.6 0.4 5 91.8 3.3 0 33.4 26 40.6 0 PHF 1 .675 .934 .704 .000 .900 .845 .660 .833 .250 .811 .882 .900 .917 .000 .904 .711 .808 .762 .000 .850 .963 ba France Ave Out In Total 41 839 1 2580 271 7361 76 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data W � 6 "vim J 1 I W ^ N wo o5 North i 2 — m Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM 0 O� O L y Unshifted o o Cn a m 41 T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 238 671 0 894 1349 2243 Out In Total Frgnr.p Ave ba 65th St & Southdale Hospital 6 -9 am & 3 -6pm Edina, MN 1686 -380 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN rirnllnC Prinforl_ I Inchiftori 0 File Name : 65th st & parking lot Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 4/2/2013 Page No : 1 07:00 AM 3 Southdale Hospital 1 0 4 65th St 18 0 0 Southdale Hospital 0 1 6 65th St 7 18 65 15 0 From North 130 07:15 AM From East 0 2 0 From South 5 31 From West 37 1 1 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Toes Right Thru Left Peds A .TOe, Ri ht Thru Left Peds App. TOeI Ri ht Thru I Left Peds I App. Toes Int.Total 06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 13 7 0 22 30 06:15 AM 4 0 0 0 4 1 6 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 6 47 9 0 62 74 06:30 AM 4 0 2 0 6 3 10 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 2 9 60 19 0 88 109 06:45 AM 6 0 1 0 7 1 20 0 0 21 0 1 1 0 2 25 76 24 0 125 155 Total 14 0 3 0 17 5 43 1 0 49 0 2 3 0 5 42 196 59 0 297 368 07:00 AM 3 0 1 0 4 3 18 0 0 21 0 1 6 0 7 18 65 15 0 98 130 07:15 AM 4 0 2 0 6 5 31 1 0 37 1 1 5 0 7 12 76 11 0 99 149 07:30 AM 2 0 1 0 3 1 49 2 0 52 3 0 8 0 11 29 79 10 0 118 184 07:45 AM 5 2 1 0 8 4 36 6 0 46 0 0 11 0 11 43 91 19 0 153 218 Total 14 2 5 0 21 13 134 9 0 156 4 2 30 0 36 102 311 55 0 468 1 681 08:00 AM 7 0 1 0 8 5 25 1 0 31 2 0 9 0 11 46 70 18 0 134 184 08:15 AM 6 0 2 0 8 2 42 1 0 45 0 0 13 0 13 53 96 15 0 164 230 08:30 AM 6 0 1 0 7 4 49 1 0 54 7 0 28 0 35 66 89 11 0 166 262 08:45 AM 4 1 2 0- 7 1 30 4 0 35 2 0 28 0 30 55 64 9 0 128 200 Total 23 1 6 0 30 12 146 7 0 165 11 0 78 0 89 220 319 53 0 592 876 03:00 PM 18 0 1 0 19 3 70 1 0 74 15 1 30 0 46 40 38 9 0 87 226 03:15 PM 14 0 3 0 17 3 54 4 0 61 16 0 45 0 61 37 45 11 0 93 232 03:30 PM 18 0 1 0 19 0 88 2 0 90 13 2 33 0 48 34 48 2 0 84 241 03:45 PM 14 0 2 0 16 1 68 3 0 72 21 1 27 1 50 29 38 15 0 82 220 Total 64 0 7 0 71 7 280 10 0 297 65 4 135 1 205 140 169 37 0 346 1 919 04:00 PM 15 0 0 0 15 2 84 1 0 87 9 0 36 0 45 20 35 7 1 63 210 04:15 PM 8 0 0 0 8 5 79 4 0 88 5 0 29 0 34 18 37 2 0 57 187 . 04:30 PM 6 0 0 0 6 4 84 2 0 90 5 0 38 0 43 15 38 0 0 53 192 04:45 PM 8 0 0 0 8 3 76 1 0 80 6 0 24 0 30 17 42 0 0 59 177 Total 37 0 0 0 37 14 323 8 0 345 25 0 127 0 152 70 152 9 1 232 1 766 05:00 PM 7 0 0 0 7 2 72 2 0 76 7 0 18 0 25 16 31 0 0 47 155 05:15 PM 5 1 0 0 6 2 49 3 0 54 5 0 11 0 16 14 29 0 0 43 119 05:30 PM 5 0 2 0 7 1 47 1 0 49 4 0 9 0 13 9 25 4 0 38 107 05:45 PM 9 1 0 0 10 2 32 1 0 35 3 2 21 0 26 10 24 8 0 42 113 Total 26 2 2 0 30 7 200 7 0 214 19 2 59 0 80 49 109 12 0 170 494 Grand Total 1 178 5 23 0 206 58 1126 42 0 1226 124 10 432 1 567 623 1256 225 1 2105 4104 Apprch % 86.4 2.4 11.2 0 4.7 91.8 3.4 0 21.9 1.8 76.2 0.2 29.6 59.7 10.7 0 Total % 1 4.3 0.1 0.6 0 5 1.4 27.4 1 0 29.9 3 0.2 10.5 0 13.8 15.2 30.6 5.5 0 51.3 �G3 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Southdale Hospital 6 -9 am & 3 -6pm Edina, MN 1686 -380 File Name : 65th st & parking lot Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 4/2/2013 Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak He it for Entire Intersecti— R—;— t n7-Ar. AINA Int. Total 07:45 AM Southdale Hospital From North 65th St From East Southdale Hospital From South 65th St From West Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Toes Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. ToWl Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.W Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Ap.T.Wl Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak He it for Entire Intersecti— R—;— t n7-Ar. AINA Int. Total 07:45 AM 5 2 1 0 8 4 36 6 0 46 0 0 11 0 11 43 91 19 0 153 218 08:00 AM 7 0 1 0 8 5 25 1 0 31 2 -- 0 9 0 11 46 70 18 0 134 184 08:15 AM 6 0 2 0 8 2 42 1 0 45 0 0 13 0 13 53 96 15 0 164 230 08:30 AM 6 0 1 0 7 4 49 1 0 54 7 0 28 0 35 66 89 11 0 166 262 Total Volume 24 2 5 0 31 15 152 9 0 176 9 0 61 0 70 208 346 63 0 617 894 % App. Total 77.4 6.5 16.1 0 8.5 86.4 5.1 0 12.9 0 87.1 0 33.7 56.1 10.2 0 PHF .857 .250 .625 .000 .969 .750 .776 .375 .000 .815 .321 .000 .545 .000 .500 .788 .901 .829 .000 .929 .853 /}G4 Southdale Hospital Out I Total ® 3 09 241 21 51 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data m � r— / North �2= 2 ° tr N m Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 A m o 't tr y Unshifted m m Ut o� ° m �o y a °° N °— +, T r Left Thru Ri ht ads 611 Ol 91 0 2 9 89 Out n Total /}G4 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Southdale Hospital 6 -9 am & 3 -6pm Edina, MN 1686 -380 File Name : 65th st & parking lot Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 4/2/2013 Page No :3 - Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Southdale Hospital 65th St Southdale Hospital 65th St From North From East From South From West Start Time Rig Thr Left Ped w= T -1 Rig I Thr Ped Left App Taa Right Thr Left Peds App, Total Right Thr Left Peds App, Total ht u S 0 2 ht u s 3 70 u 0 74 15 0 30 0 - Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Southdale Hospital —Qjjl In Total 6 1 119 641 01 71 0 Right Th Left Peds Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM Peak Hour Data 0 2 North 03:00 PM 18 0 1 0 19 3 70 1 0 74 15 1 30 0 46 40 38 9 0 87 226 03:15 PM 14 0 3 0 17 3 54 4 0 61 16 0 45 0 61 37 45 11 0 93 232 03:30 PM 18 0 1 0 19 0 88 2 0 90 13 2 33 0 48 34 48 2 0 84 241 03:45 PM 14 0 2 0 16 1 68 3 0 72 21 1 27 1 50 29 38 15 0 82 220 Total Volume 64 0 7 0 71 7 280 10 0 297 65 4 135 1 205 140 169 37 0 346 919 % ADD. Total 90.1 0 9.9 0 2.4 94.3 3.4 0 31.7 2 65.9 0.5 40.5 48.8 10.7 0 ju �— I Southdale Hospital —Qjjl In Total 6 1 119 641 01 71 0 Right Th Left Peds Peak Hour Data 0 2 North N ~2 0 Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 P m o r nshifted r o O °9 m wm �° a ° o C9 — 4� T r Left Thru ia eds 1351 41 651 1 50 205 F 355 Out In Total ju �— I WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Drew Ave File Name : 65th st & drew ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Site Code : 00000006 Edina, MN Start Date : 4/3/2013 1686 -38 Page No : 1 hrmine Printarl_ I Inehiffarl 07:00 AM 9 Drew Ave 0 0 15 4 65th St 4 0 17 Drew Ave 13 16 0 30 65th St 10 21 0 36 From North 07:15 AM 9 8 From East 0 21 4 From South 6 0 27 From West 20 0 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds APP. 28 Ri ht Thru Left Peds App. Tnmi Ri ht Thru Left Peds A .Taml Ri hl Thru Left Peds .Tome Int.Total 06:00 AM 1 1 0 0 2 2 4 1 0 7 0 5 1 0 6 4 5 11 0 20 35 06:15 AM 1 3 0 0 4 4 5 2 0 11 0 11 11 0 22 3 6 20 0 29 66 06:30 AM 5 2 1 0 8 3 9 4 0 16 0 24 9 0 33 6 3 44 0 53 110 06:45 AM 9 4 0 0 13 13 12 3 0 28 0 22 8 0 30 5 16 44 0 65 136 Total 16 10 1 0 27 22 30 10 0 62 0 62 29 0 91 18 30 119 0 167 347 07:00 AM 9 6 0 0 15 4 9 4 0 17 1 13 16 0 30 5 10 21 0 36 98 07:15 AM 9 8 4 0 21 4 17 6 0 27 1 14 20 0 35 8 21 28 0 57 140 07:30 AM 18 16 4 1 39 4 26 6 0 36 4 18 20 0 42 3 20 36 0 59 176 07:45 AM 13 7 1 0 21 8 29 6 0 43 1 29 29 0 59 12 22 50 0 84 207 Total 49 37 9 1 96 20 81 22 0 123 7 74 85 0 166 28 73 135 0 236 621 08:00 AM 21 11 0 0 32 3 25 13 0 41 4 24 17 0 45 14 25 21 0 60 178 08:15 AM 16 8 2 0 26 7 25 3 0 35 1 18 24 0 43 20 31 31 1 83 187 08:30 AM 20 8 2 0 30 5 23 10 0 38 3 16 14 0 33 15 30 37 0 82 183 08:45 AM 10 6 1 0 17 4 21 1 0 26 3 6 10 0 19 9 18 32 0 59 121 Total 67 33 5 0 105 19 94 27 0 140 11 64 65 0 140 58 104 121 1 284 669 03:00 PM 34 22 4 0 60 5 24 7 0 36 3 7 12 0 22 24 11 13 0 48 166' 03:15 PM 34 14 2 1 51 0 26 6 0 32 4 11 12 0 27 25 23 17 0 65 175 03:30 PM 45 44 3 0 92 2 17 8 0 27 4 10 16 0 30 25 21 22 0 68 217 03:45 PM 38 27 1 0 66 3 21 3 0 27 0 7 12 0 19 28 16 15 0 59 171 Total 151 107 10 1 269 10 88 24 0 122 11 35 52 0 98 102 71 67 0 240 729 04:00 PM 30 24 4 0 58 1 25 8 0 34 3 4 10 0 17 28 14 14 0 56 165 04:15 PM 26 29 1 0 56 0 23 9 0 32 4 6 15 0 25 16 16 8 0 40 153 04:30 PM 49 22 5 0 76 4 34 8 0 46 5 5 12 0 22 28 16 8 0 52 196 04:45 PM 18 19 2 0 39 3 22 6 0 31 4 11 7 0 22 30 19 11 0 60 152 Total 123 94 12 0 229 8 104 31 0 143 16 26 44 0 86 102 65 41 0 208 666 05:00 PM 27 25 2 0 54 1 30 2 0 33 1 6 10 0 17 36 15 8 0 59 163 05:15 PM 23 10 1 0 34 0 20 10 0 30 1 6 11 0 18 18 24 15 0 57 139 05:30 PM 19 15 0 0 34 1 16 13 0 30 1 7 6 0 14 26 23 13 1 63 141 05:45 PM 19 11 2 0 32 0 20 1 0 21 0 5 4 0 9 7 10 12 0 29 91 Total 88 61 5 0 154 2 86 26 0 114 3 24 31 0 58 87 72 48 1 208 534 Grand Total 1 494 342 42 2 8801 81 483 140 0 7041 48 285 306 0 639 395 415 531 2 1343 3566 Approh % 56.1 38.9 4.8 0.2 11.5 68.6 19.9 0 7.5 44.6 47.9 0 29.4 30.9 39.5 0.1 Total % 13.9 9.6 1.2 0.1 24.7 2.3 13.5 3.9 0 19.7 1.3 8 8.6 0 17.9 11.1 11.6 14.9 0.1 37.7 �G � WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Drew Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -38 File Name : 65th st & drew ave Site Code : 00000006 Start Date : 4/3/2013 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 0745 AM Int. Total 07:45 AM Drew Ave From North 65th St From East Drew Ave From South 65th St From West Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.ToUl Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.TOWI Right I Thru I Left I Peds p .Toal Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.ToW Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 0745 AM Int. Total 07:45 AM 13 7 1 0 21 8 29 6 0 43 1 29. 29 0 59 12 22 50 0 84 207 08:00 AM 21 11 0 0 32 3 25 13 0 41 4 24 17 0 45 14 25 21 0 60 178 08:15 AM 16 8 2 0 26 7 25 3 0 35 1 18 24 0 43 20 31 31 1 83 187 08:30 AM 20 8 2 0 30 5 23 10 0 38 3 16 14 0 33 15 30 37 0 82 183 Total volume 70 34 5 0 109 23 102 32 0 157 9 87 84 0 180 61 108 139 1 309 755 % App. Total 64.2 31.2 4.6 0 14.6 65 20.4 0 5 48.3 46.7 0 19.7 35 45 0.3 PHF 1 .833 .773 .625 .000 .852 .719 .879 .615 .000 .913 .563 .750 .724 .000 .763 .763 .871 .695 .250 .920 .912 X47 Drew Ave Total t oI 3 5 0 Right Thru Le. it Peds Peak Hour Data Z0J W N 'o 2 o ff North �2 2N v, 10 — _ Peak Hour Begins al 07:45 A + Unshif ed �x N °i EL m o m — 4, T r Left Th ru ht Peds 841 871 91 0 ® 8 ®3 Out In Total X47 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Drew Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -38 File Name : 65th st & drew ave Site Code : 00000006 Start Date : 4/3/2013 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Inferzectinn Renins of n3'M PM In1. Total 03:00 PM Drew Ave 65th St Drew Ave 65th St 60 From North From East From South From West Start Time Rig Thr Left Ped aPp am Rig Thr Ped Left aPa Right ght Thr Left Peds ppp,T°al Right Thr Left Peds App. To al 51 ht u s 0 ht u S 12 0 u 25 23 17 U 65 175 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Inferzectinn Renins of n3'M PM In1. Total 03:00 PM 34 22 4 0 60 5 24 7 0 36 3 7 12 0 22 24 11 13 0 48 166 03:15 PM 34 14 2 1 51 0 26 6 0 32 4 11 12 0 27 25 23 17 0 65 175 03:30 PM 45 44 3 0 92 2 17 8 0 27 4 10 16 0 30 25 21 22 0 68 217 03:45 PM 38 27 1 0 66 3 21 3 0 27 0 7 12 0 19 28 16 15 0 59 171 Total volume 151 107 10 1 269 10 88 24 0 122 11 35 52 0 98 102 71 67 0 240 729 A . Total 56.1 39.8 3.7 0.4 8.2 72.1 19.7 0 11.2 35.7 53.1 0 42.5 29.6 27.9 0 PHF .839 .608 .625 .250 .731 1 .500 .846 .750 .000 .847 1 .688 .795 .813 .000 .817 1 .911 .772 .761 .000 .882 1 .840 kv� Drew Ave Out In Total 112 269 38 T- I 1511 107 10 1 Right T hr Left Pads Peak Hour Data 6 F (Ds -i ? �+ p O �^ North N a° m fi N N. Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 P w N F.q 0 ° _ y ° Unshifted �� p � N �o d .0 A 4, T r Left Thru i ht Peds 52 35 ill 0 233 F 98 331 Out In Total kv� 66th St & Drew Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -38 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN (_mi inn D.;n*err I 1 —k;0 -1 File Name : 66th st & drew Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 4/4/2013 Page No : 1 07:00 AM 3 Drew Ave 7 0 11 66th St 78 5 0 Drew Ave 0 0 0 0 66th St 6 29 5 0 From North 160 07:15 AM From East 1 6 0 From South 35 117 4 From West 0 0 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Tow Right I Thru I Left I Peds A , Total Right I Thrr1 I Left I Peds I Ap,. Tatal Right]--T—MUT 23 Left I Peds I Ap,. Toni Int. Total 06:00 AM 1 1 5 0 7 7 27 2 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 3 14 1 0 18 61 06:15 AM 2 0 5 0 7 18 36 1 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 5 16 3 0 24 86 06:30 AM 0 2 5 0 7 25 47 4 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 3 26 5 0 34 117 06:45 AM 2 1 6 0 9 29 46 3 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 3 44 11 0 58 145 Total 5 4 21 0 30 79 156 10 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 14 100 20 0 134 409 07:00 AM 3 1 7 0 11 26 78 5 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 5 0 40 160 07:15 AM 7 1 6 0 14 35 117 4 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 2 53 5 0 60 230 07:30 AM 3 1 23 0 27 50 189 6 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 6 56 9 0 71 343 07:45 AM 9 2 12 0 23 50 225 12 0 287 0 0 0 0 0 8 61 13 0 82 392 Total 22 5 48 0 75 161 609 27 0 797 0 0 0 0 0 22 199 32 0 253 1125 08:00 AM 2 2 15 0 19 27 171 11 0 209 0. 0 0 0 0 6 73 15 0 94 322 08:15 AM 7 0 13 0 20 57 160 7 2 226 0 0 0 0 0 8 56 9 0 73 319 08:30 AM 14 1 16 0 31 19 119 8 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 2 64 15 0 81 258 08:45 AM 6 4 20 0 30 30 99 18 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 4 72 22 0 98 275 Total 29 7 64 0 100 133 549 44 2 728 0 0 0 0 0 20 265 61 0 346 1174 03:00 PM 12 5 35 0 52 21 132 26 1 180 0 0 0 0 0 11 107 8 0 126 358 03:15 PM 19 6 40 0 65 23 162 22 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 10 84 11 0 105. 377 03:30 PM 23 5 54 0 82 21 148 41 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 .11 105 7 0 123 415 03:45 PM 12 7 49 0 68 11 180 21 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 12 104 10 0 126 406 Total 66 23 178 0 267 76 622 110 1 809 0 0 0 0 0 44 400 36 0 480 1556 04:00 PM 10 4 62 0 76 14 182 36 0 232 0 0 0 0 0 4 138 14 0 156 464 04:15 PM 17 2 51 0 70 8 184 24 1 217 0 0 0 0 0 6 146 9 0 161 448 04:30 PM 13 8 73 0 94 12 202 23 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 3 174 13 0 190 521 04:45 PM 9 4 47 0 60 18 200 28 0 246 2 0 0 0 2 5 173 7 0 185 493 Total 49 18 233 0 300 52 768 111 1 932 2 0 0 0 2 18 631 43 0 692 1926 05:00 PM 15 3 51 0 69 9 176 34 0 219 0 0 0 0 0 12 204 6 0 222 510 05:15 PM 10 7 40 0 57 7 179 35 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 37 176 4 3 220 498 05:30 PM 7 4 27 0 38 6 174 27 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 11 185 3 0 199 444 05:45 PM 8 5 31 0 44 5 165 24 0 194 0 0 5 0 5 12 155 5 0 172 415 Total 40 19 149 0 208 27 694 120 0 841 0 0 5 0 5 72 720 18 3 813 1 1867 Grand Total 211 76 693 0 9801 28 3398 422 4 4352 2 0 5 0 7 190 2315 210 3 2718 8057 Apprch % 21.5 7.8 70.7 0 12.1 78.1 9.7 0.1 28.6 0 71.4 0 7 85.2 7.7 0.1 Total % 2.6 0.9 8.6 0 12.2 6.6 42.2 5.2 0 54 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 2.4 28.7 2.6 0 33.7 Aq WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 66th St & Drew Ave File Name : 66th st & drew 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Site Code : 00000007 Edina, MN Start Date : 4/4/2013 1686 -38 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 0730 AM InL Total Drew Ave From North 66th St From East Drew Ave From South 66th St From West Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A2P.TOW Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A— TOW, Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.Ul Right I Thru I Left I Pads I App.TW Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 0730 AM InL Total A7" " 9 Out In Total 2301 F 89 F 3191 5 63 0 Right T� Le. R Peds 07:30 AM 3 1 23 0 27 50 189 6 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 6 56 9 0 71 343 07:45 AM 9 2 12 0 23 50 225 12 0 287 0 0 0 0 0 8 61 13 0 82 392 08:00 AM 2 2 15 0 19 27 171 11 0 209 0 0 0 0 0 6 73 15 0 94 322 08:15 AM 7 0 13 0 20 57 160 7 2 226 0 0 0 0 0 8 56 9 0 73 319 Total Volume 21 - 5 63 0 89 184 745 36 2 967 0 0 0 0 0 28 246 46 0 320 1376 % App. Total 23.6 5.6 70.8 0 19 77 3.7 0.2 0 0 0 0 8.8 76.9 14.4 0 PHF .583 .625 .685 .000 .824 .807 .828 .750 .250 .842 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .875 .842 .767 .000 .851 .878 A7" " Drew Ave Out In Total 2301 F 89 F 3191 5 63 0 Right T� Le. R Peds Peak Hour Data 75 W �� p 0 co t —I North 4—= p 2 M rn m CO _ Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A ° t Unshifled r m r= rn (n O� ° �o T r Left Thru Ri hl Peds ol ol Ol 0 69 69 Out In Total A7" " WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 66th St & Drew Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -38 File Name : 66th st & drew Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 4/4/2013 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Drew Ave 66th St Drew Ave 66th St Out In Total 761 356 From North From East From South From West Start Time Rig I Thr Left Ped .11 T- Rig Thr Ped Left — Right Thr Left Peds App. Ta rai Right Thr U Peds nPP. roWi 04:45 PM ht u s 28 ht u s 0 0 0 u 15 3 51 0 69 9 176 34 0 219 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Drew Ave Out In Total 761 356 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM Inl. Total Right Thru Left Peds 04:30 PM 13 8 73 0 94 12 202 23 0 237 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 9 4 47 0 60 18 200 28 0 246 2 0 0 0 05:00 PM 15 3 51 0 69 9 176 34 0 219 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 10 7 40 0 57 7 179 35 0 221. 0 0 0 0 Total volume 47 22 211 0 280 46 757 120 0 923 2 0 0 0 % Ann. Total 16.8 7.9 75.4 0 5 82 13 0 Out In Total Ave 100 0 0 0 —(l Drew Ave Out In Total 761 356 471 221 2 1 0 Inl. Total Right Thru Left Peds T 1 Peak Hour Data 0 3 174 13 0 190 521 2 5 173 7 0 185 493 0 12 204 6 0 222 510 0 37 176 4 3 220 498 2 57 727 30 3 817 2022 7 89 3.7 0.4 —(l Drew Ave Out In Total 761 356 471 221 2 1 0 Right Thru Left Peds T 1 Peak Hour Data oO R �s J 1 I rn o O W r—� North -2 N rn Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P N r - i/ (o Uns ifted -0 w O T CL N O Cl) 4-, T r Left Thru i a t e 01 01 21 0 199 2 [ 201 Out In Total Ave —(l 07:00 AM 7 France Ave 20 0 107, 66th St W . . , 24 0 France Ave 12 62 66th St W 0 76 4 26 7 From North 37 302 07:15 AM From East 105 , 17 0 From Soi th 26 51 From West 0.' _ 105 13 Start Time. Ri ht Thru Left I Peds a .Totii Right Thru I Left Peds a '.rte R7ight ' Thru -.Left Peds a .Tom Right Thru I Left 1. Peds I Ap, Tout: 1m.Tota1 06 :00 AM 0 . 35. , 8 0 43 9 3 6. 0 ;18 3 21-'-0', 2 .0 26 3 12 '' 4 0 19 : 106 06:15 AM , 3 35 7 0 45 11 10 : ., 6 0 27 11 34 1 0 -, 46. 0 l0 ...' 11 0 . "21 139 06:30 AM 6 58 12 0 76 20 : 23 14 0. 57 12 .. 59 -' 2 0 73. 5 22 . . 8 0., 35 241. 06:45 AM 2 60 13 0 75. 2l 30' 13 0 64 22 47 1 0 70 7 34 10 0` 51 260 Total 11 188 40 0 239 61 66 39 0 166: 48 161 6 0 215 15 78 33 0 126 •746 07:00 AM 7 80 20 0 107, 22 36 24 0 82 12 62 2 0 76 4 26 7 0 37 302 07:15 AM 12 . 105 , 17 0 134' 26 51 28 0.' _ 105 13 66 2 0 81 3 44 16 0 63 383' 07:30 AM 8 142 21 0 . 171 47 73` 52 0 172 16 93,i 3 . 0 112 8 . 48 20 6 76 .531 07:45 AM 8 161 19 0 188 35 81 62, 0 178 17 66 4 0. 87 10 50 10 0 70 523 Total 35 488 77 0 600 130' 241 166 '" 0 537` 58 287 :.11 0 356 25 -168 53 0 246 1739 08:00 AM 13 161 32 0 206;. 38 69 60 0 167 14 76 4 0 99 14 42 11 0 67 539 08:15 AM 9 130 25 0 164, 30 47 46 0. 123 20 99 8 0 127 7 57 21 0 85 499 08:30 AM 8 155 35 0 198 35 38 48 0 121 26 102 4 0 132 7 51 19 0 77 528 . * ** BREAK * ** .Total 30 446 92 0 568 103 154 154 0 411 65 277 16 0 358 28 150 51 0 229 1566 * ** BREAK * ** 11:00 AM 10 192 45 0 247 54 43 70 0 167 40 138 24 0 202 26 41 12 0 79 695 11:15 AM 15 182 43 0 240 58 30 55 0 143 38 157 21 0 216 33 55 .20 0 .108 707 11:30 AM 12 165 46 0 223 64 52 71 0 187 62 .150 .30 0 .242 29 60 8 0 97 749 11:45 AM 7 175 49 0 231 44 59 66 0 169 59 171 27 0 257 33 67 11 0 111 768 Total 44 714 183 0 941 220 184 262 0 666 199 616 102 0 917• 121 223 51 0 395 2919' 12:00 PM 10 177 65 0 252 60 55 76 0 191 53 158 43 0 254 31 68 14 0 113' 810 12:15 PM 15 176 54 0. 245 64 65 82 0 211' 62 218 28 0 308 30 60 14 0 104 868 12:30 PM 12 159 51 0 222 60 59 X73 0 192 47 183 33 0 263 21 67 18 0 106 783 12:45 PM 8 208 45 0 261 .68 52 80 0 200 47 191 33 0 271 33 65 11 0 109 841 Total 45 720 215 0 980 252 231 311 0 794 209 750 137 0 1096 115 260 57 0 432 3302 * ** BREAK * ** '03:00 PM 9 134 62 0 205 44 68 19 0 131 59 186 72 0 317 6 59 18 0 83 736 03:15 PM 13 161 78 0 252 .43 64 29 0 136 60 208 58 0 326' 12 46 17 0 .75 " 789 " 03:30 PM 10 141 64 0 215 52 82 56 0 190 55 187 69 0 311 23 67 7 0 97 813 03-45 PM 21 153 43 0 217 70 58 70 0 198 50 189 38 0 277 21 78 13 0 112'. 804 Total 53 589 247 0 889 209 272 '174 0 655 224 770 237 0 1231 62 250 55 0 367 3142 04:00 PM 18 156 ;'72 0 246 31 .88 66 0 185 49 163 24 0 236 25 69 19 0 113 780 04:15 PM 8 192 63 0 '.263 :61 60 46, 0 167 61 189 32 0 282 14 66 9 0 89 801 04:30 PM 10 149. 61 0 220 51 75 59 0 185 _ 76 185 34 0 295 24 77 14 0 115' 815 04:45 PM 11, 147 46 0 264 64 77 64 0 205 64 163 28 0 255 20' 80 15 0 115, 779 Total. 47 644 242 0 933 207 300. ,235' 0 742 250 700 118 0 1068 83 292' X57 0 432 3175 05:00 PM 78 152 69 0 239 68 88 63 0 219 84 228 46 0 358 17 104 23 0 144 _ 960 05:15 PM 17 143 74 0 234 63 69 38 0 170' 55 230 45 0 330 24 93 13 0 130 864 05:30 PM 10 167' 67 ` 0 244;, :':.. 52 76 53 0 181 51 180 23 0 254 30 87 6 - 0 123 802 05:45 PM 19 143 82 0 244 58 51 35 0 144 47 190. 38 0 275 21 95 7 -0 123 786 Total 64 605 292 0 961 241 284, 189 0 714 237 828 152 0 1217 92 379 49 0 520 3412' Grand Total. 329 4394 1388 0 6111 1423 1732 1530 0 4685 1296 4389 779 0 6458 541. 1800 '466 0 2747 20001 Apprch % 5.4 71.9 22.7 0 30.4- 37 32.7 0 20 68 111 0 19.7 65.5 14.8 0 1 Total % 1.6 22 6.9 0 . 30.6 7.1 8.7 7.6 0 23.4 6.4 21.9 3.9 0 32.3 2.7 9 2 0 13.7 470-1, WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 66th St 6-9,11-1, 3 -6 Edina, MN File Name : fance & 66th Site Code : 00000104 Start Date : 1/10/2007 Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of l Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM I.I. Total 07:30 AM France Ave From North 66th St W From East France Ave I From South 66th St W From West Start Time A Toml I Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds . I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A .T-1 I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A .Total Right Thru I Left I Peds A .Tool Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of l Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM I.I. Total 07:30 AM 8 142 21 0 171 47 73 52 0 172 16 93 3 0 112 8 48 20 0 76 531 07:45 AM 8 161 19 0 188 35 81 62 0 178 17 66 4 0 87 10 50 10 0 70 523 08:00 AM 13 161 32 0 206 38 69 60 0 167 19 76 4 0 99 14. 42 11 0 67 539 08:15 AM 9 130 25 0 164 30 47 46 0 123 20 99 8 0 127 7 57 21 0 85 499 Total volume 38 594 97 0 729 150 270 220 0 640 72 334 19 0 425 39 197 62 0 298 2092 App. Total 5.2 81.5 13.3 0 23.4 42.2 34.4 0 16.9 78.6 4.5 0 13.1 66.1 20.8 0 PHF .731 .922 .758 .000 .885 1 .798 .833 .887 .000 .899 1 .900 .843 .594 .000 .837 1 .696 .864 .738 .000 .876 .970 AI J France Ave Out In Total © 7 9 F1275 381 5941 971 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data oO�s J T •�.' O o m0 2� North ~2 ° c t Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A 0 a O M L� i � Unshifted N N O O C C CD O d d N O W 4, T r Left Thru to Peds 191 3341 721 0 853 788 Out In Total AI J WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 66th St 6-9,11-1, 3 -6 Edina, MN File Name : france & 66th Site Code : 00000104 Start Date : 1/10/2007 Page No : 3 Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Beeins at 12:00 PM lnt. Total 12:00 PM France Ave 66th St W France Ave 66th St W 252 From North From East From South From West Start Time Rig Thr Left Ped "°"T °' Rig Thr Ped Loft .p >*„ Right Thr Left Peds App.Toul Right Thr Left Peds App. Toil 65 ' ht u 211 s 218 ht u s 30 60 u 0 104 868 12:30 PM u 159 51 Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Beeins at 12:00 PM lnt. Total 12:00 PM 10 177 65 0 252 60 55 76 0 191 53 158 43 0 254 31 68 14 0 113 810 12:15 PM 15 176 54 0 245 64 65 ' 82 0 211 62 218 28 0 308 30 60 14 0 104 868 12:30 PM 12 159 51 0 222 60 59 73 0 192 47 183 33 0 263 21 67 18 0 106 783 12745 PM 8 208 45 0 261 68 52 80 0 200 47 191 33 0 271 33 65 11 0 109 841 Total volume 45 720 215 0 980 252 231 311 0 794 209 750 137 0 1096 115 260 57 0 432 3302 App. Total 4.6 73.5 21.9 0 31.7 29.1 39.2 0 19.1 68.4 12.5 0 26.6 60.2 13.2 0 PHF .750 .865 .827 .000 .939 .926 .888 .948 .000 .941 .843 .860 .797 .000 .890 .871 .956 .792 .000 .956 .951 P f France Ave Out In Total 10591 1 9801 1 2039 451 720 215 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 6 �� J rN m0 o 2 —+. North f -2 a c c� _ - Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 P _ m � E y Unshifted .� y� �o CO fD V d _ O_ N O 4, T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 1 37t 750 2091 0 1146 F 1096 F2240 Out In Total P f WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 66th St 6-9,11-1, 3 -6 Edina, MN File Name : france & 66th Site Code : 00000104 Start Date : 1/10/2007 Page No : 4 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak I of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM NI. Tolol 04:30 PM France Ave 66th St W France Ave 66th St W 220 From North From East From South From West Start Time Rig Rig Thr Left Ped 295 Rig Thr Ped Left A, — Right Thr Left Peds App. Tow Right Thr Left Peds App.rom 64 77 u 0 s 64 ht u s 255 20 u 15 0 115 779 u 18 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak I of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM NI. Tolol 04:30 PM 10 149 61 V 0 220 51 75 59 0 185 76 185 34 0 295 24 77 14 0 115 815 04:45 PM 11 147 46 0 204 64 77 64 0 205 64 163 28 0 255 20 80 15 0 115 779 05:00 PM 18 152 69 0 239 68 88 63 0 219 84 228 46 0 358 17 104 23 0 144 960 05:15 PM 17 143 74 0 234 63 69 38 0 170 55 230 45 0 330 24 93 13 0 130 864 Total Volume 56 591 250 0 897 246 309 224 0 779 279 806 153 0 1238 85 354 65 0 504 3418 App. Total 6.2 65.9 27.9 0 31.6 39.7 28.8 0 22.5 65.1 12.4 0 16.9 70.2 12.9 0 PHF .778 .972 .845 .000 .938 .904 .878 .875 .000 .889 .830 .876 .832 .000 .865 .885 .851 .707 .000 .875 .890 France Ave Out In Total 111 897 2014 561 5911 2501 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data O J O W m North 4-2 o rn Peak Hour Begins at m L Y Unshifted N r. �� a G 0 — 41 T r Left T ru Right Peds 153 806 279 0 900 1238 F 2138 Out In Total SmTrer/k Shnda6an Sertmury 4119120 '3 Ealsiirg AM Peak Hour Ca lto Measures of EHedWewss 176 K: \01686- 3801TraKclSynchro12013 MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs) 5/152013 m © ®m�mmm ®oo ® ©om���000mo m ®moom___ m ®te ®oeoeenteetsttem�e�nnnt�ts �em� ®e___ ��nnnnennnenntstem�n ®neet�ts � ®�______ m © ©m ®nn © ®e�samt,mmmmeset ®ts m���n ®��� eeoemeoemn ® ®emm ® ®neeet�ts �tt■tt■tt■ts ®��� memmm�e ®tmen ©t�tts'mn ®meset�ts mt ©tntntetntt■tt■tt■ m ©emte ©mum ®tenetemnnneeet�ts m���t ©,stets,® ;mtetemeteteeme ® ©mm�mnnneent ®ts m���e ®��� meennnmee ©� ®mt��m�� ®nnet�ts �tstntnts ®amts emetee® emm�e ®t ©t��,�m�mnnet ®ts��etet ®t ®tit ®t�t�tt■ m ®meeme ©m ©e ©t ©t�mm ®meet ®ts �t�t�t�t ®tts��t� 'meoemneem ®nnt ®t�;m�© ®neat ®ts �t�t�t�tst�t 'm�������� ©t ®t® 'mnnnnnnnnnnne�mnnnseet�ts �oemme ©mmmnen ©�;em��nnnt ®ts etetntet�t�tt■tt■tn me © ©m ©enen� © ®tn�m ® ® ®enet�ts �tststnt ®tntt■tt■tt■ e ®emene ®m ®e ©name ® ©nnet�ts �tetst�t ©tmt ®t ®tt■ m ®���nnne ®���t�mnnneset�ts �tt■tntntntnt��tt■ 'm ®���0000��Emtmmm000000t�ts m�������� I� m����nnne��tm�mmnnneeene��mt •������� m����nnnnEm���mmnnneeet�ts m�������� 176 K: \01686- 3801TraKclSynchro12013 MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs) 5/152013 S%nTraMs S%nJallon Summary 411913913 E[ISrXg PM Pea% Hod Condlllms Menmea of Errecllveness K: 101686- 380\Tra(fic \Synchro12013 MOEs TAB: ]PM MOEs] 5/15/2013 me�mm e ®m ®e�e�em��� ©ee�om ©�eme___ now m ©seeseeeme ©a�;m�e ®nun ®e mem,������ ®m © ®em ®m ©e�me�m ®e ®seem•e �e ®m, ®m.��� 'mmm�emm ® ®nae ®mom ©meeee ®e m���e ©e ®m, meem�mem�ee ©emm ® ® ®eee ®e m���ee��� �I� mm�m�m� ®m ®�emt�m��mnnem.e ®meee��� mmmm�mem ® ®e ® ®mtme ®mnee�e �� ®��� ® ®m•® mmneneeeeeenemtmeeesee�e ��������� mm ® ®�m�meee ©mtmtm��meee�e �e ®��m.m, ©� K: 101686- 380\Tra(fic \Synchro12013 MOEs TAB: ]PM MOEs] 5/15/2013 ShnTrarrk Sbndallon su•wury snanaaa YOU No Bultl AM Peak How Measwes or EHetlNeness k-7 W K \01686- 380\Traf cASynchroVO14 NB MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs] 511512013 m__= mmo ®mmm ® ® ©o ®omm� ® ®000�o �,mo ®o ® e� ®eemm� ©e ©ee� ®�eee�e�oe___e ®ee® e ©m ©m ®mmm ® ©�e�mmm ®ese ®e m___ee�_� m ©emm ©emm ® ©nemmmmmeee�e m___e ®ems® mm ®m ®mmm ®n ® ©mtmmmm ®eee ®e m�_�e���� �mmm�memme ®ee�e�m ©ene�e ee� ® ©���_ meoe ©mme ®e ® ®e�!mmmmneem,e �e��e�_�® • !meenneseeneneemesesee�e 'ememeemmm m________ ©� © ®�em�mnenm,e ee ®ewe___ m © © ©ee ©emm ® © ©emmm ®nee�e �se��e___ • • o����0000����monn0000�o m________ k-7 W K \01686- 380\Traf cASynchroVO14 NB MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs] 511512013 skaTrarno sknUVon summary 6/1N200 2014 No Build PM Peak Hour Messorea or Eff.df resa K:\01686-380\TraffidSynchroUO14NBMOEs TAB: ]PM MOEs] 5/15/2013 3: 661h Street & Drew Ave ��eeseeeeeeee e���eeeese�e�o�________ K:\01686-380\TraffidSynchroUO14NBMOEs TAB: ]PM MOEs] 5/15/2013 sknTramr SI-dadoo surorray 41148013 2014 BWId AM Peak Hour Measures or Effective- W K :\01686- 380\Traf6c \Synchro\2014 Build MOEs TAB: ]AM MOEs] 5/1512013 mmm� ' ®mom ©om ® ©mm� ® ®000�o meemmemmee� ®amm��mneem�e��!m���mt ®ee® mmme�m�e� © ®mmtmm ® ®mnne�e mm��m• ®��� mmem ®mmemnene�m���een ®e 'm ®mom ® ®��� mmnemenne ®em ©�;n��emnne�e �mte������ emmmememesese�;emmmnee ®e m���ess��� m © ©emese ®mom ®® ®;mom ®mneem.e ����ee��� meenmeeem ©em ®��mm ®mesa ®e � ®m. ® ® ®��� eem ®m © ®e ®ne © ®�,enmmeee ®e m���em,��� m ©em�em ©gin ® ©emmmmmeeeme m���ommem. mm ®emm ®m ® ©�mmtme ®mmeee�e m���em��� mmme�mmem © ®e ®�m� ® ®nee�e mm.eee ®a ®e emmm��emmn ®e ®�,e ®mmene ®e ear ®e�ee� m ®em�m�m� ©se ©mtm� ®mnee�e me�ee���� meemeemmee ®e ©mt����mneem�e me��m,�e ©® mneneennenesemtmnenesem. a m�������� oeemmeemm ©eee�,o���nen�e a ®�e�m,��� me ©emeemm ®se ®��m� ® ®esem�e �emt�m,e��� m ©e ©me ©semne ®�,m��meee�e �m,�ee�m,e� 'm�� ®�neee ®���m,mneneeem■e m�������� �o����onoo ®���omnn0000m■o o�����e�� m����nnee ®� ®�mmneneeem■e m�������� m����eeee����m;mnneeeem•e ��������� � m����nnen����mmnnneeem■e !m�������� m����neen����mmnnneeem■e m�������� W K :\01686- 380\Traf6c \Synchro\2014 Build MOEs TAB: ]AM MOEs] 5/1512013 S'anTrank S'enJa0on S-uy 511412013 2014 Build PM Peak Hour Measures of EBetlWemss �I l KA01686380\Tratfi6Synchro12014 Build MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] 5115/2013 m000 � ®o meme�m ®eme�� ®�m�� ®�eo�e mo ®eme___ �me� ®e�e�e�e ©a�,� ®m ©eee ®e � ®mmmemmm m�mn���e� see ©�ie� ®�eee�e��emmmmmmmm mm�mmnm�e ® ©��mm ®��eee ®e mmmm ®mmmm ',memm ®eee ® ®e © ®�m� ®eee ®e mmmmmemmm 4: 661h Street & France Ave mme�eme���� ©e�m���nen�e �mmememmm me�� ®e��m ®ems ®�m� ®�nee�e �emmmmem® �ennneeseneee�menesee�e mmmmemmmm mm ®tee ®memn�ee�e�� ®nnn�e � ©memmmmm m ®�eoe���se ©��Im�� ®nee�e � ®mmmmm ®m m����nnee������nesese�e •• mmmmmmmmm m����noon����mmnnoeeo�o mmmmmmmmm m����0000����mm000000�o mmmmmmmmm m����nnen����mmnneeee�e mmmmmmmmm �II� m����nnnn����mmnnneee�e • • mmmmmmmmm m����eene����m,mneneee�e mmmmmmmmm im����nene����mmnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm m����neee����mmnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm m����nene����mmnnneee�e • • ilmmmmmmmmm m����nenn�����mnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm m����nnnn����mmnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm m����nnnn����mmnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm �I l KA01686380\Tratfi6Synchro12014 Build MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] 5115/2013 SunTmff,c ShUflm Sv q wla 13 20M No BuDd AM PeaMH w Measves al EHedWercsa qua K \01686- 380\TmffidSynchro12030 NB MOEs TAB: ]AM MOEs] 5/15/2013 omo��000�moom ®mm�o�000�o m © ®oo ®___ mnnneseneee�e�meenese�e m�������� qua K \01686- 380\TmffidSynchro12030 NB MOEs TAB: ]AM MOEs] 5/15/2013 SknTralric Skmlallon Sunawry 511M010 2000 No Bu0d PM Peak Hour Measures of Enediveness A- %3 K:\01686-380\TratriclSynchro\203ONSMOEs TAB: [PM MOEs[ 5/15/2013 o n®V",m���nnn�e � ©en ® ©enenenmtmtm��ennn�e �___ee___ �� mmmm ®mmmmne ®amm ® ®meeem■e� m���neemm, 'memmeemme ©e ®em'mmmmeoem■e m���mtm��� mmmr�nemme "m" ��mneee mm���0000�� ®�mm000000m■o��m��mt����� m����nnnn����emnnneeem■e 'm����nnnn����emnnneeem■e ��������� m�������� m����nnnn����mmneneeem•e �m�������� m����nenn����e,menneeem■e m�������� A- %3 K:\01686-380\TratriclSynchro\203ONSMOEs TAB: [PM MOEs[ 5/15/2013 ShnTn;ne sO wru nllalion Sury W M01] 2030 Build PM Peak How Measures of Effediveness K10168 &38(ATmfficlSynchro12030 Build MOEs TAB: (AM MOEs) 5/15/2013 ��mo��mo��oo�oomm�� ®000�o mommmo___ o em ®�emm ©e ®eee�m�e�eee�e m___e�___ �seeeeseesese����seesee�� �________ eemmmm ®mm ®� ©��m ® ®aee�e�o,� ® ®e ® ®___ K10168 &38(ATmfficlSynchro12030 Build MOEs TAB: (AM MOEs) 5/15/2013 skuTrame skuutarol Su—ary 6114=3 2030 Buld PM Peak Hour Measures of EHedlveness �� S KA016853801TratfidSynchmW30 Build MOEs TAB: ]PM MOEs] - 5/15/2013 mneseneesesee�mesesee�e i��������� m ®� ®�nnno���msolm000000�o m�������� m ®� ®�nenn���mse,mnnneee�e m���s���� �� S KA016853801TratfidSynchmW30 Build MOEs TAB: ]PM MOEs] - 5/15/2013 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 P -00 -1 Fairview Southdale Hospital 6401 France Avenue South, Edina, MN Request: Final Development Plan for hospital expansion and Conditional Use Permit for construction of a parking ramp at 6400 France Avenue South Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Fairview Southdale hospital is seeking approval for an expansion that includes remodeling existing space, expanding outpatient services, additional medical office space, and construction of structured parking on the existing surface parking lot west of France Avenue. The expansion would occur in three phases. Phase I would be a single story with lower level addition to the west side of the building. Phase II would further expand the first floor, would add three levels of medical office space (MOB) above the addition, would construct a 984 space parking structure west of France Avenue which would be connected to the hospital by a skyway over France. Phase III would reorient the hospital's main entrance from the north to the west side and complete the interior remodeling. The proposed 4 level, 984 space parking structure requires 2 setback variances. The first is along the north property line which is the right of way for the Crosstown highway. The ramp has been pushed as far north as possible to maximize the setback from 65th Street. As a result a 32 foot setback variance is requested which is equal to the height of the ramp. The second variance occurs at the southwesterly corner of the ramp where a 4 foot setback variance is requested. The ramp provides a 31 foot setback where 35 feet is required. Mr. Larsen explained when all 3 phases of the hospital expansion are complete the Floor Area Ratio for the site will be 1.06 which exceeds the maximum FAR of 1.0 for the Regional Medical District. This ultimate FAR, however, does not take into account the property west of France owned by the hospital (the parking ramp property). If given credit for this property the FAR would drop to 0.88 and would not require a variance. The relocated ring road along the west and north sides of the building comes within 3 feet of the property line on the north side and within 5 feet along the west side of the building. The required setback is 20 feet. Thus, a 17 foot parking setback variance is required. The ring road is necessary because the hospital intends to limit access to the parking areas to the west and north of the building. 0� Mr. Larsen pointed out the Zoning Ordinance bases parking requirements for hospitals on the number of beds and employees. We have found this standard does not work to evaluate parking demand for a modern hospital campus. Rather we have relied on parking counts and the experience at other suburban hospitals to determine how much parking is needed. This method has worked well. The hospital's parking consultant estimates a overall demand of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the completed project. The proposed ramp would provide parking adequate to meet expected demand. According to the analysis existing parking is adequate to meet Phase I demand. Mr. Larsen told the Commission the traffic impact of the proposed development is addressed in the attached Traffic Impact Study prepared by BRW, Inc. The study is attached for Commission review. The study has been reviewed by the City Engineer. Recommendations for area improvements are detailed on page 30 of the report. Improvements to Drew Avenue should occur coincident with Phase I, while improvements west of France should occur when the ramp is built in Phase IL Mr. Larsen stated Fairview Southdale is a community asset that provides vital services to the community and region. Staff believes it is essential that the hospital have the flexibility to react and change as the delivery of health care evolves. Acquiring the site west of France Avenue allows the hospital this flexibility. Construction of the skyway will allow the two sites to function as one. Traffic is, and will continue to be an issue in this area. Proposed improvements in the Traffic Study are consistent with the city's master planning for the area. Staff recommends approval of the ,3 phase plan for the expansion and remodeling, and also recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the 4 level ramp conditioned on: 1. Permits from 9 Mile Creek Watershed District 2. Hospital participation in street and intersection improvements as set out in the Traffic Impact Study 3. Refer ring road design to staff to examine possible modification which could occur with Phase II of the project Mr. Mark Enger, Mr. Daniel Weber were present representing Fairview Southdale Hospital. Mr. Richard Dahl was present representing BWBR Architects, and Mr. Howard Preston of BRW was present. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen why 6400 France Avenue (site of proposed ramp) requires a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Larsen explained the site is zoned APD, Automobile Parking District, and constructing a ramp in an APD zone requires a Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner McClelland commented that she has some concern that in the future the ramp could be sold to a separate party. Mr. Larsen responded once the ramp is physically connected to the hospital via the skyway that concern would not be an issue. Commissioner Swenson noted Phase I is aggressive and eliminates parking during the construction phase. She asked if staff believes parking demands will be met during the construction process. Mr. Larsen agreed that providing adequate parking will be a balancing act, adding he believes during the construction period parking will be adequate. Commissioner Swenson suggested that the parking ramp structure be constructed first, thereby providing parking during construction phases. Mr. Mark Enger addressed the Commission and informed them Fairview Southdale Hospital (FSH) is 35 years old, has experienced many changes, and is committed to the City of Edina and the community. Mr. Enger said the main site is15 acres, and was donated to FSH by the Dayton family for health care to the community. Mr. Enger told the Commission for the past three years FSH has looked at numerous expansion scenarios, and believes the plan before the Commission this evening fulfills the hospitals and communities needs. Mr. Enger said FSH is now operating at its maximum capacity due to the growth of the southwest suburbs, and FSH needs to meet the demands of the community. Mr. Enger explained the proposed campus expansion will be accomplished in three phases, and it is the goal of the hospital to accomplish the three phases with as little disruption as possible. Mr. Enger introduced to the Commission, Mr. Daniel Weber also of FSH. Mr. Weber informed the Commission the goal of the hospital, is to orient the hospital toward the west, France Avenue. He said the front entrance for the hospital will be moved from the north to the west taking full advantage of France Avenue. Mr. Weber added new landscaping.will be incorporated on site and a "green area" will be developed on the first floor allowing visitors and patients to enjoy the outdoors. Mr. Weber also noted the hospital will be creating quasi - public spaces that the hospital intends to offer the community for use. Mr. Weber said the hospital wants to develop a strong purpose of campus. Mr. Weber introduced Mr. Rick Dahl, architect for the project to further explain the proposal. Mr. Dahl told the Commission the goal of the project is to create a recognized campus that is approachable and flexible. Mr. Dahl added the project is also cost effective, and re- enforces the sense of campus. Continuing, Mr. Dahl said the master plan will include; clinical components and. support spaces, educational facilities, quasi - public spaces, medical office building, parking ramp and a skyway spanning France Avenue. Mr. Dahl said the master plan is proposed to be implemented over the course of three phases. Mr. Dahl explained Phase I is proposed to begin in the spring of 2000 and completed by the winter of 2002. Phase I will include 74,000 square feet of expansion .which will occur on the first and lower levels. Phase I also includes 52,000 square feet of remodeling on the first floor. Phase I will include the heart center, including a cardiology suite of seven procedure rooms. Surgery facilities are also expanded by adding eight Ors and MRI is being relocated adjacent to the Emergency Department. Phase II adds the medical mall, parking ramp and skyway. This phase is targeted to begin in the spring of 2001 and end in the winter of 2002. Mr. Dahl said Phase III includes the completion of the medical mall, expansion of the post- operative recover area, a 20 foot wide lower level concourse will be created to route public traffic from the new outpatient entrance. Construction of Phase III is anticipated to being in the spring of 2002 and completed in the fall of 2003. Concluding Mr. Dahl explained the building design will be respectful of the existing hospital, and the proposed materials for expansion include brick to match the existing building, precast concrete, and green marble. Similar materials will be used on the proposed skyway and parking ramp. Mr. Enger told the Commission traffic is a concern in the area, and the hospital is working with City staff on signage to aid in the better flow of traffic, and to divert some traffic to Valley View Road. Mr. Enger said there will -be some temporary parking inconveniences that the hospital hopes to mitigate by. providing shuttle services for staff and temporary parking solutions. Chairman Johnson questioned if the bulk of patient and visitor parking will be located in the proposed new ramp west of France Avenue and will the existing ramp be used by staff. Mr. Enger responded the existing ramp will be used by tenants and patients of the existing medical office building. Mr. Enger said he believes the vast majority of staff will park in the new parking structure. Chairman Johnson said the last time the hospital came before the Commission there was some talk about West 65th Street and Drew Avenue. Chairman Johnson questioned what happened to that plan. Mr. Enger said a previous option of the hospital was an expansion that included the closure and re- routing West 65th Street. Mr. Enger said that scenario has died. Mr. Enger introduced Mr. Howard Preston of BRW. Mr. Preston said as part of the traffic study BRW conducted a technical analysis of what is occurring now, and what will occur in the future. Mr. Preston said he has worked closely with Mr. Hoffman from the City's Engineering Department, and has suggested that Drew Avenue be widened from 66th Street to 65 th Street to accommodate traffic. h6 Chairman Johnson asked if there has been any discussion between the hospital and the neighborhood. Mr. Preston said prior to the change in scenarios BRW conducted a vehicle trace survey in the area. This survey indicated that much of the traffic on West 65th Street appeared to be destined for the hospital. Mr. Preston said it has been their goal to focus traffic coming to . and going from the hospital to West 66th Street and Drew Avenue. Mr. Enger, interjected and told the Commission FSH has held two community forums inviting the neighbors giving them an opportunity to discuss the proposed expansion, and in addition the hospital has kept in contact with Pacey Irk, Chair of the Colony Association. Mr. Enger said at this time there appears to be no issues. Chairman Johnson stated traffic on Valley View Road coming west from the proposed ramp concerns him. He pointed out Valley View Road is 300 to 400 feet from the ramp, and if a vehicle turns right onto Valley View Road, and turns left onto Crosstown a stacking problem will occur. Chairman Johnson noted it is already difficult to get onto Crosstown. Mr. Preston, said FSH is looking into the possibility of creating signalization at the south and north ramp terminals. Mr. Preston said it is hoped this will assist vehicles in getting from 65th onto Valley View Road going north and turning west onto the Crosstown. Mr. Preston added congestion on the Crosstown highway is beyond the scope of the hospital. Chairman Johnson stated during certain hours one can't get on the Crosstown ramp. Continuing, Chairman Johnson said he has a concern especially during rush hour that travelers will figure out a way to wind through the neighborhood and pick up north bound 100 at Benton Avenue. Mr. Preston agreed that is a possibility. Mr. Enger interjected it is difficult to define when rush hours starts and stops, adding hospital shift changes are during different hours, and it is our hope that the staggered time frame distributes traffic. Mr. Enger said the hospital shares the same concerns regarding traffic. He stated it is important to the hospital that patients and visitors gain easy access to the campus. Mr. Enger concluded hospital staff is very interested in working with the City, County and State, to resolve traffic issues, reiterating finding solutions is very important to FSH and the community. Commissioner Swenson questioned Mr. Hoffman if it is possible to put a traffic light at the bottom of the Valley View Road exit from Crosstown Highway. Mr. Hoffman said that can be accomplished, adding there is a plan to construct three lanes at this point because the exit lane is so short merging into flowing traffic with so many turns required to gain access to France Avenue. Commissioner Swenson said she also has a concern with the ramp.entrance from Valley View Road traveling westbound on Crosstown Highway. She said it is difficult to excelerate fast enough because the merge lane is so short. Mr. 410 Hoffman said he agrees with that observation, and explained there is an idea using additional land to making the merging easier. Commissioner McClelland said she noticed the hospital has stressed it is a non for profit organization, and pointed out when the hospital requested the office building and ramp in the NE corner of the campus it was felt at that time that that would be the last expansion to the campus. Mr. Enger explained BTO, owner of the medical office building is not a non profit organization. He said they are for profit and pay property taxes, and will continue to pay taxes on the existing building, and the proposed new office suites. Continuing, Mr. Enger pointed out the demand for medical facilities has increased during the last decade which can be noted in the occupancy rates of medical facilities along France Avenue. Mr. Enger said he cannot address what occurred before he came to FSH, and how the hospital presented itself at that time, but believes this expansion is needed and is an asset to the community. Commissioner McClelland questioned Mr. Enger on the temporary structure variance the hospital requested in December. Mr. Enger said at this time FSH is considering other options. It was found that the cost of the temporary structure exceeds the budget of the hospital. Mr. Dahl interjected he was present at the December Zoning Board hearing and explained as designed the temporary structure would be required to conform to building codes and cost became a factor. Concluding, Mr. Dahl said they are in the process of discussing other temporary options. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Enger is he knows the percentage breakdown of residents that use the hospital and It's campus facilities. Mr. Enger explained FSH encompasses the SW metro area, which includes Edina, parts of southwest Minneapolis, Bloomington, and Richfield. Mr. Enger said that percentage is roughly 85 %. 15% comes from other regions. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen the difference between Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and lot coverage. Mr. Larsen explained lot coverage (building footprint coverage) calculations are used in the residential districts. FAR is used in commercial and other zones and measures the gross floor area divided by the lot area. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if he knows of any areas in the City where the FAR is as intense. Mr. Larsen said many of our commercial zones are at the maximum FAR. Mr. Larsen explained what is different in this situation is that France Avenue divides the campus creating a situation where the property west of France Avenue cannot be used in FAR calculations, even if it is owned by the hospital and considered part of the campus. 41 l Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if he has a concern about setting a FAR precedent. Mr. Larsen said by law variances are not precedent setting, they are always unique to each site. Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Larsen if he is aware of future development plans on the Southdale Medical Building site. Mr. Larsen said that is a real possibility. He added the traffic analysis was required to assume an addition will occur on that site. Commissioner Lonsbury asked. Mr. Larsen if City Code allows skyways. Mr. Larsen said skyways are not addressed in the code. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said France Avenue is a County road and the County has indicated they have no problem with the proposed skyway as long as it meets height requirements. Commissioner Lonsbury questioned if any code modifications should occur regarding skyways. Mr. Larsen stated that is worth thinking about, adding at the present time he does not believe there is another skyway imminent. Commissioner Byron moved to recommend Final Development Plan and Conditional Use approval, subject to: permits from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District; hospital participation in street and intersection improvements as set out in the Traffic Impact Study; refer ring road design to staff to examine possible modification which could occur with Phase II of the project, and subject to variance approval as they relate to the parking ramp and ring road. Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion. Chairman Johnson asked Commissioner's Byron and Bergman if they would accept an amendment to the motion that would include the further study and discussion of Drew Avenue and its intersections. Commissioner's Byron and Bergman accepted the amendment. All voted aye; motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/February 15, 2000 Passed and adopted this 15th day of February, 2000. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Ordinance No. 850 -A -16 adopted. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO APRIL 4, 2000, FINAL DEVLEOPMENT PLAN, FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Mr. Larsen reported that Fairview Southdale Hospital has requested approval for an expansion that would include remodeling existing space, expanding outpatient services, additional medical office space and construction of structured parking on the existing surface parking lot west of France Avenue. The proposal requires the Council approve a Final Development Plan and a Conditional Use Permit. The expansion would take place in three phases. Phase 1 would be a two -story addition (one -story with basement) to the west side of the existing building. Phase 2 would further expand the first floor, add three levels of medical office space (65,700 square feet) above this expansion and would construct a 984 space parking structure west of France Avenue connected to the hospital by a skyway over France. Phase 3 would reorient the hospital's main entrance from the north to the west side of the building and complete the proposed interior remodeling. Mr. Larsen added that City staff requested the hospital complete an environmental assessment worksheet which the Council has received. He said that Statute requires no action for 30 days after publication of the worksheet which was published February 7, 2000. Therefore, Mr. Larsen recommended that action would need to be continued until at the earliest March 21, 2000. The proposal requires two variances. He explained that the ramp has been pushed as far north as possible to maximize the setback from 65th Street. As a result, a 32 -foot setback variance is requested is equal to the height of the ramp. The second variance is at the southwesterly corner of the ramp where the ramp provides 31 feet of setback and 35 feet are required resulting in a variance of 4 feet. Mr. Larsen said that when all three phases of the expansion are complete, the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the site will be 1.06 which exceeds the maximum FAR of 1.0 for the Regional Medical District. He noted that this FAR does not take into account the property west of France owned by the hospital (the parking structure). When given credit for the property west of France the FAR drops to 0.88 and would comply with Edina Code. Parking regulations base requirements upon the number of beds and employees. Staff has found this standard does not work to evaluate parking for a modern hospital campus. The parking consultant has estimated an overall demand of 5 spaces for 1,000 square feet of completed project. The proposed ramp would provide 1,137 (originally 984) parking spaces and based upon parking counts and experience at other suburban hospitals it is believed the proposal will adequately meet the demand. Page 7 41-3 Minutes/Bdina City Council/ February 15, 2000 Mr. Larsen reported, that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the Fairview Southdale Hospital expansion subject to the following conditions: 1. Watershed District permits; 2. Hospital participation in street and intersection improvements set out in the traffic impact analysis section of the EAW.; and 3. Redesign of ring route and parking area west of the addition to be reviewed by staff. Following the Planning Commission meeting, Planning and Engineering staff met with hospital representatives to consider site plan changes which would reduce hard surface and add landscaped area along the France Avenue side of the hospital. As a result of those discussions, a revised site plan and landscaping plan have been submitted. The revised plan eliminates the separate parking and ring route areas west of the building, reduces parking and hard surface area, while providing additional landscaped areas. The parking area west of the building will be used primarily for handicapped parking. The parking north of the building will continue to be short term physician parking. Mr. Larsen said the changes appear to represent a significant improvement and staff recommends approval of the change. He added that partially in consideration for the site plan changes; the hospital is requesting consideration of a slightly larger parking ramp. The expanded ramp would increase capacity from 984 stalls originally proposed to 1,137 stalls. The expansion would occur on the west side of the structure. This expansion would meet setbacks and not require a variance. The additional spaces would replace those lost through the redesign of the site plan, and would provide a cushion to handle occasional peak demand times for the hospital and clinic. The expanded ramp would remain at four levels. He concluded that staff recommended approval of the revised ramp plan. Member Faust asked if the parking west of France would be free or fee parking; if the Phase 2 parking could be required before the Phase 1; whether the expansion to the ramp requires a variance; and how high would the skyway be above France Avenue? Mr. Larsen replied he assumed it would be fee parking, that the parking would be completed as soon as possible, however, according to the traffic study of the EAW the surface lot should be able to handle Phase 1 parking needs. He added that the expansion to the parking ramp does not require a variance, and that the skyway was planned to be 18 feet above France Avenue. Member Faust commented that she wants to see the parking constructed during the first phase. Proponent Presentation Mark Enger, Administrator, Fairview Southdale Hospital, thanked the Council for the opportunity to present the hospital's proposed expansion plans. He noted that Fairview will celebrate its 35th year of service during 2000. Mr. Enger said the proposed expansion was in response to additional demands for service. As the suburban population has increased, demographics changed and technologies have advanced. Hospitals see large increases in calls for services in many areas. Page 8 14A T- Minutes/Edina City Council/February 15, 2000 Mr. Enger said the team has been working for almost .two years to develop the proposed expansion plans. He showed the Council and audience the architectural renderings of the proposed expansion. Mr. Enger reported the Board has approved $35,000,000 of improvement in the Phase 1 & 2 expansions. The hospital intends to expand its surgical capacity and its cardiovascular services; to build structured parking on the surface lot, west of France Avenue to be attached to the hospital via a skyway; and add medical office space. Mr. Enger stated that the hospital has attempted to be diligent in working with neighbors. They have hosted two community forums. Mr. Enger reiterated that the hospital is very committed to the community. Their intent is to create space available to the community when not used by the hospital. They are also very concerned about traffic. For this reason the ramp has been designed to disperse traffic. Mr. Enger asked the Council for their support of the project. He introduced Mr. Richard Dahl, BWBR Architects, and Mr. Howard Preston of BRW Traffic Consultants. Richard Dahl, BWBR Architects, explained he had been working with Fairview Southdale Hospital for two years. Mr. Dahl said four principles guided the proposal: proactive wellness;. accessible facilities; flexibility of use; and cost effectiveness. Mr. Dahl reported the building design responded to space allocation, would be respectful of the existing hospital, and re- enforces the sense of campus. The master plan will include: clinical components and support spaces, education facilities, quasi - public spaces, medical office building, parking ramp and a skyway spanning France Avenue. Mr. Dahl explained Phase 1 is proposed to begin in Spring 2000 and be completed by Winter 2002. It will include 74,000 square feet of expansion occurring on the first and lower levels. Phase 1 also includes 52,000 square feet of remodeling on the first floor of the hospital. It will include the heart center (a cardiology suite of seven procedure rooms), surgery facilities will also be expanded by adding eight OR's and MRI will be relocated adjacent to the Emergency Department. Phase 2 will add the medical mall, parking ramp and skyway. Mr. Dahl said this phase would be targeted to begin construction during Spring 2001 and be completed Winter 2002. Phase 3 would include the completion of the medical mall, expansion of the post- operative recovery area, a 20 -foot wide lower -level concourse to route public traffic from the new outpatient entrance. Mr. Dahl stated that Phase 3 would begin Spring 2002 and be completed Fall 2003. He added that during the third phase the main entrance would be reoriented to France Avenue and the interior space will be changed, thus necessitating the greatest demand for additional parking. Member Johnson asked the proponents what the need was for additional medical offices? Mr. Enger replied there was an increased demand for office space, and that the plan would create office space around certain clinical specialties. Mayor Maetzold commented that Southdale was the only five star heart hospital in the upper midwest. Member Faust expressed concern with construction parking. Where are all the construction workers parking? This could create a very difficult situation in an already strained area. She Page 9 41- Minutes/Edina City Council/ February 15, 2000 asked that by the time the hospital came back for its final approval in April; the construction parking should be worked out and reported to the Council. Mr. Enger acknowledged the concern for construction parking. He said off -site parking would most likely be needed. Southdale Shopping Center may be a possible location. Member Hovland said that Fairview Southdale has been a good corporate citizen. He applauded their desire to expand, improve accessibility and approachability. Member Hovland acknowledges the ramp west of France Avenue promotes these issues. He asked how many patients are expected daily? Mr. Enger replied estimates are 240 beds per day plus 120 emergency room visits. In addition, there will be increased outpatient use. It is anticipated that there will be up to 19,000 car visits per day. Member Hovland asked if the proposal looked to 2005 and beyond and about the demographics of the potential patient base. Mr. Enger said yes, it had and assumed a 3% annual growth factor. He added that 70% of the patients come from Edina with the remaining 30% from the Minnesota Valley area. Member Hovland expressed concern with growth and increased traffic demands. He asked if perhaps MnDOT should be asked to create direct access to Valley View and to the ramp. Member Hovland also asked if the increased number of employees had been factored into the traffic calculations. Howard Preston of BRW explained that as part of the traffic study, BRW conducted a technical analysis of what the current traffic is and what the future will bring. He said he worked with the City Engineering Department and has suggested that Drew Avenue be widened from 66th Street to 65th Street to accommodate traffic. Mr. Hoffman added there is a plan to construct three lanes at the bottom of Valley View Road's exit from Crosstown Highway and to bring the traffic directly into the ramp without cars ever needing to go as far east as France. Public Comment Pacy Erck , 6315 Colony Way. Ms. Erck, President Colony Homeowners Association, stated she represented 500 residents from 308 units. They are concerned about traffic. Ms. Erck reported that parking issues already exist. Colony resident are very concerned with the congestion on Drew Avenue and about pedestrian traffic coming from the parking ramp. With the redesign of 66th Street now only right turns are allowed onto Barrie Road. Ms. Erck urged the Council to require the parking structure be in place before any other expansion is built. Construction of this magnitude will take two to three years and keep 500 people frustrated and in jeopardy. Linda Schmidt, 6483 Barrie Road, complained that the morning traffic on Barrie Road speeds now. She urged that traffic be directed to avoid Barrie Road. Doug Murray, 6566 France Avenue, stated he is the Legal Chair for the Point of France Board of Directors. Mr. Murray echoed the traffic concerns of the previous speakers. He stated he had a number of questions about the parking structure and stated it will decrease the value of Page 10 44f Minutes/Edina City Council/February 15, 2000 a number of Point of France homes. Mr. Murray urged that the structure be extensively screened and that any trees planted be mature trees. Point of France has concern with the ramp's height and its rectangular shape. Mr. Murray asked what about future expansion of the ramp. Mayor Maetzold noted that the Council may only deal with the current proposal. Mr. Murray continued questioning whether the proposal was the best use of the space. He pointed out that many accidents occur at 65f Street and France Avenue and urged the Council to proceed with caution. Doug Erickson, 5020 Richmond Drive, stated he believed that the proposed expansion was a nightmare waiting to happen. Mr. Erickson urged caution in any approval because of the impact on France Avenue traffic. Katherine Abbott, 6566 France Avenue South, stated she lives overlooking a traffic jam. Ms. Abbott said she had no notice of any proposed expansion until last week. She asked the City to get control over the height of the ramp and to ensure there is adequate screening. Ms. Abbott asked if there would be another opportunity to review the proposal. Unidentified Women, 6315 Colony Way, asked if there were any guarantee the parking would be built. She questioned whether people will be able to cross France Avenue after the construction. Council Discussion/ Action Mayor Maetzold asked if the Council wished to close the public hearing. Member Johnson made a motion to close the public hearing. No second. Member Johnson withdrew his motion for lack of second. Member Kelly stated he did not support the hospital expansion as proposed. Member Faust asked if there was a height restriction on the ramp and if the hospital increased the traffic on Drew Avenue could they be required to install sidewalk on Drew? Mr. Larsen answered the parking structure could have three additional levels added in the future He added it could be recommended that the hospital participate in the cost of installing sidewalk. Manager Hughes said that sidewalk could be looked at now and added as a condition of approval. Member Faust stated that she believed if the hospital is creating a problem, they should be required to solve it. Member Hovland commented the expansion is extremely complex. He indicated he had concerns with traffic related issues. Mr. Hoffman explained that it has been intended to bring traffic from Valley View to the proposed parking structure. This would attempt to keep the parking traffic off France Avenue. Guidance signs would be installed on the Crosstown Highway. Mr. Preston of BRW added the traffic has been analyzed and it is the hospitals desire to divert as much traffic from France Avenue as possible. He noted that perhaps 30 -35% Page 11 41V I Minutes/Edina City Council/ February 15, 2000 hospital traffic comes from the west and will be directed to Valley View Road. He added that about 36% of the traffic comes from the east and it was hoped to direct them onto 66th and Drew using lights and intersection improvements to move traffic off France. Member Hovland stated he continued to be troubled by the statistics shown in the traffic analysis. Mayor Maetzold said he could not be at the March 21, 2000, Council meeting and since it seemed more discussion of this issue was needed; he suggested the item be carried over until April 4, 2000. Consensus of the Council was to carry the item over to April 4, 2000. Linda Schmidt, 6483 Barrie Road, said she frequently travels on Valley View and she is concerned that increased traffic will cause traffic back -up onto the freeway. Member Johnson moved to continue the public hearing until April 4, 2000, and to grant the City a sixty day extension from action until, May 11, 2000. Member Kelly stated he was opposed to granting a 60 -day extension from action. He continued adding he could support a hospital expansion, however, in his estimation, the proposal makes a bad situation worse. He suspects the site will be overbuilt. Member Kelly said he found nothing aesthetically appealing for the Highway 62 /France major city intersection. The landscaping proposed was poor and the set of variances requested very ambitious. He challenged the architects to redo their design and come up with answers to the concerns expressed by Council and citizens and urged them to not only address the hospital's desires, but also the communities'. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Maetzold Nay: Kelly Motion carried. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED, FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES, NORTHEASTERN QUADRANT OF HIGHWAY 169 & I -494 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Mr. Larsen explained the subject property is approximately 13 acres and zoned Planned Office District, POD -1. The property is vacant. Its northerly 75 feet are subject to an NSP easement for an overhead transmission line. The central portion of the site contains a pond covered by an easement in favor of the state highway department and a large portion of the site is impacted by wetlands and flood plain. Mr. Larsen noted the City of Edina owns the property having acquired it from the FDIC in 1991. He said the City has entered into a purchase agreement with the Frauenshuh Company to acquire and develop the property. The site became part of the City of Edina as a result of a land exchange with the City of Bloomington that included portions of the Raddison South Page 12 A" WHEREAS, the Coun it considered the extent the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacatio and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or muni . ality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas a d sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed va tion to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion th eof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, ernove or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R OLVED by the City Council of the ity of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the Rowing public street right -of -wa and utility and drainage easements are hereby vacated of ctive as of April 4,2000: All drainage and utility easements, created by the plat of Brae ood Park, which are contained within the following: Lo 1, except the Easterly 1 feet thereof, Block 1, Braewood Park; Part of that certain drainage and utility e record in Hennepin County, Minnesota, Lot 1, Block 1, Braewood Park, All of 78th Street, as dedicated in Braewood in Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies it, create y Document No. 1456628 of the W t 10 feet of the East 185 feet of ,cording to the plat thereof of record ly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot YBI ck 1, Braewood Park, thence westerly along a southerly line of said Lot, and al g a c e concave northerly and having a radius of 7489.44 feet, a central angle of degree 1 inutes 29 seconds and a chord of 173.16 feet bearing South 87 degrees 3 minutes 4 econds West, an arc distance of 173.16 feet to the intersection of said outherly line .th the easterly line of said 78th Street, being the point of beginnin of the line to be d crib( then South 88 degrees 10 minutes 30 seconds West 150.0 feet to the intersectio of the westerly line of said 78th Street with the southerly li of said Lot, and there ter ' ating. BE IT FURTHER RESOLV that said vacation does n %ar: ffect, and there are continued, reserved, and retained y the said resolution ordering thcation, the following existing easements and authori in, on and under the above vacated The authority of Nort rn States Power Company, US West Co unications, Paragon Cable Minnesota, Minnegasco to enter upon the above va ated area for the maintenance, repl cement, repair and removal of and for other attending to, underground co duit, manholes, cables, wires and poles required r utility service now in, on or u der the above vacated area. BE IT FURT ER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of comple on of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Audito and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.8 . Member Johnson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: aust, Hovland,. Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Mod n carried. RESOLUTION 2000 -38 ADOPTED APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR NEED OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONTINUED UNTIL APRIL 18, 2000 - FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL BUILDING EXPANSION AND PARKING RAMP CONSTRUCTION (6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated there were three items requiring action all related to the proposed expansion of the hospital, the added medical office space, and the parking ramp proposed west of France Avenue. At the first hearing for the hospital expansion, the comment period for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was still open so the hearing was continued. Mr. Larsen explained the EAW, was a study of the impact of the development, to ascertain whether a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would be needed. The hospital voluntarily completed the EAW, prepared by BRW, at the request of City staff. The EAW's 30 day comment period for the draft document ended on March 8, 2000. All comments received on the EAW were sent to the Council. The Council was also sent a response to the comments, that lists some findings of fact, supporting a negative declaration, meaning that no EIS would be necessary. Mr. Larsen stated that if the Council decided to support the negative declaration, they would be able to act on the local zoning requests consisting of a Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit. The Final Development Plan would allow the expansion of the hospital on the east side of France Avenue. The Conditional Use Permit would allow the hospital to construct a four -level parking structure on the west side of France Avenue connected by a skyway to the hospital. Mr. Larsen noted that a major part of the EAW was a traffic study. He introduced Rick Nau of BRW who would review the traffic study, its findings, and BRW's recommendations. Proponent Comment Richard Nau, BRW, Traffic Consultant for Fairview Southdale reviewed the Fairview Southdale and Southdale Medical Office Building (MOB) Traffic Study. Mr. Nau said the traffic study included the following elements: • Counts of 1999 existing traffic volumes • Estimate background traffic growth between 1999 and 2005 • Estimate traffic generated by hospital and Southdale MOB expansions • Analyze traffic operations with and without expansion traffic • Determine needed roadway improvements Member Faust asked which medical office building Mr. Nau was referring to in his report; the proposed Fairview expansion or the office building owned by Northco. Mr. Nau said he was referring to the office building owned by Northco. The report included both the expansion of Fairview Hospital and the Southdale Medical Office Building (MOB) owned by Northco. Mr. Nau. stated it was determined that the hospital expansion would generate an additional 330 trips per day or a 55% increase and the MOB expansion would generate 264 trips per day or a 45% increase in area traffic. Mr. Nau. displayed a graphic illustration of the estimated traffic impact on area intersections after the expansions, showing increases ranging from 2% to 12% by the year 2005, with the intersection at West 65th Street and France Avenue receiving the largest increase at 12 %. He explained that increases over 5% were significant. Mr. Nau noted that existing traffic operating deficiencies included close intersection spacing resulting in lack of stacking distance at ramp meters; and a lack of signalization that results in cross street traffic delays. These deficiencies will remain after the expansion and the additional traffic generated will warrant more signalization of the area. Proposed hospital related mitigation measures would include: Page 3 64100 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 • New guide signs on TH 62 directing westbound hospital traffic to exit at Xerxes Avenue • New guide signs on TH 62 directing eastbound hospital traffic to exit at Valley View Road - • Installation of a signal at the intersection of the Valley View ramp to TH 62 • Installation of a signal and reconfiguration of intersection to allow through and left turn movement on all four approaches at Valley View and West 65th Street • Widen Drew Avenue to 40 feet to accommodate three lanes. Mr. Nau added the intent of the proposed mitigation measures would be to bring traffic into the hospital and MOB through Xerxes Avenue and Valley View Road attempting to keep it off France Avenue. Member Hovland asked about MnDOT's comment over lack of a.m. traffic data in the study. Mr. Nau said this was discussed with MnDOT. He said the hospital is generating more traffic during the p.m. peak hour than during the a.m. peak hour. The traffic associated with the hospital does not actually coincide with the peak hours; that is, work shifts of 7 -3. For this reason, a.m. traffic data was not collected. Mr. Nau reported that after this review MnDOT was satisfied with the data provided. Member Hovland asked if there was any expectation that MnDOT would be resistant to the proposed new signage, or the curb cut and signalization at Valley View for the eastbound traffic. Mr. Nau replied that no significant resistance from MnDOT was anticipated relative to the proposed signage. He said that concern was expressed about the curb cut and will reserve judgement until a plan is submitted for their approval, however, in Mr. Nau's opinion this is still a viable solution. Member Hovland asked Mr. Nau if he had any traffic projections for volumes when the recommended mitigation measures were put into place. Mr. Nau replied that the volumes would change to some extent, but not a great deal because most of the percentage increases are relatively low. Member Hovland asked if there were other long range traffic measures that should be investigated in case of additional medical facility expansion in that quadrant. Mr. Nau said he could not comment unless he had a proposal to analyze. Member Faust expressed concern that the traffic study did not include peak a.m. traffic counts. She also asked who would pay for the recommended traffic mitigation measures such as the signals, and if sidewalks were still proposed for installation on Drew Avenue. Member Faust asked if there would still be room to install sidewalks if Drew Avenue were widened to three lanes. Member Kelly asked if Mr. Nau could comment on proposed funding of all the recommended traffic mitigation improvements. Mr. Nau replied that he did believe that there would be room for sidewalks on Drew Avenue and he stated that his traffic study did not address the funding of any of the proposed mitigation measures. He stated his assumption that because the streets involved are state aid streets there should be some funding available, but that a portion of the costs would need to be paid for locally, and that determination would be the Council's. Member Kelly added that he shared the concerns expressed earlier about the lack of peak a.m. traffic data, especially since there are indications that additional development may occur in the area. Secondly, funding of the needed improvements must be discussed. Member Kelly also Page 4 &1 b i Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 noted his concern about storm water run off. He added the Council has dealt with storm water throughout his tenure. MnDOT said they were very concerned about run off, and he noted this was not mentioned in the response to comments, however, it was stated that the net impervious area would decrease. Would this decrease include the parking structure. _Mr. Hoffman explained. that the run off from the west side of France would be directed to a new pipe directly down to the pond and would not go into any MnDOT pipes. In his experience in- the France Avenue interchange, if a 12 -inch rainfall occurs some flooding will happen, but otherwise it should not be a problem. Member Johnson questioned how BRW could propose to install a signal at the eastbound ramp of TH 62 and West 651h Street in light of the March % 2000, MhDOT letter opposing the proposed eastbound signal at West 65th' Street. Mr. Nau said that the plan has-'been reviewed by MnDOT and will require their approval,. which BRW believes will be granted. Mr. Nau said `:that providing a signal and cued detection device to prevent traffic backing up on TH 62 would allay the MnDOT concern. Member Johnson asked if any consideration had been giving to providing direct access -from TH 62 to the parking facility similar to downtown Minneapolis's Target Center exits. Mr. Nau responded that this had not been considered. He added that the downtown facilities are public not private such as the proposed hospital ramp. Mr,_ Nau said that he believed a direct access would not be consistent with MnDOT's policy relative.to access to trunk highways. Mayor Maetzold asked if the proposed widening of the exit ramp from TH 62 eastbound that link with Valley View Road. would necessitate filling the holding pond on Valley View. Mr. Nau replied that at this time there has not been detailed engineering, but a cursory look at the air photos indicated that it could fit within the existing right -of -way. Mayor Maetzold continued asking if encroachment into the pond became necessary would that be considered a significant environmental event. Mr, Nau. hesitated to give a, definitive answer, but suggested that it would most likely be a minor incursion into a storm water holding pond. Member Faust asked if an additional lane off the eastbound TH 62 had been considered. Mr. Hoffman explained that this additional lane was already planned by the City's consultant SRF to widen the ramp. He added this improvement. would be done in conjunction with the improvement of Valley View Road by the pond. He added that the pond should not be impacted by any proposed improvements to the Valley View interchange. Mark Enger, Fairview Hospital Administrator, .6401 France Avenue South, said that as a result of discussions with City staff, the City Council, citizen input, and Fairview's development staff, the hospital listened to and attempted to respond to most of the questions. Mr. Enger said that changes have occurred in how hospitals deliver service to patients. Reimbursements for charges have changed. ' Technological advances have greatly changed patient services. The focus has shifted from in- patient care to more ambulatory based services. He added that there are procedures being performed at Fairview Southdale that two years ago were not dreamed of. Patients are being discharged on the day of service that five years ago would have spent seven days in the hospital after the procedure. One in three households in: Edina has an elderly member. There has been a great increase in demand for cardiovascular care. Three years ago Fairview began planning in response to the health care needs. Mr. Enger stated that in 1998, expansion plans were begun looking at every vertical and horizontal possibility to fit expansion on a very tight hospital campus. Mr. Enger noted that the first option was to expand southerly, but the hospital could not come to terms with the other principal so they had to look at other options. He noted there are many medical office buildings on France Avenue and suggested that Page 5 "`off Minutes/Edina City Council/April 42000 the proposed medical office building expansion be viewed not as a MOB, but as a heart /vascular care center. This center will allow Edina to offer state -of -the -art care to its residents. Mr. Enger said the hospital is prepared to install sidewalks at Drew Avenue and West 651h Street. They have decided to build the parking ramp at the same time as the other Phase I expansion. Their contractor, Knutson, has arranged for workers' parking off -site and not on city streets. Fairview has contracted 430 parking spots at Southdale by Key Cadillac for ten months and intends to shuttle hospital employees during construction. He concluded urging the Council to move forward. Richard Dahl, BWBR Architects, Fairview Southdale's architects took over the presentation. Mr. Dahl used graphics to demonstrate the design changes made in response to comments received earlier. The redesigned project has redistributed the green space on the east side of France, bringing it out as a well- landscaped edge to the campus. On the west side of France Avenue the ramp has been pushed north increasing the green space which will be bermed and landscaped to 40 feet. The variance on West 65th Street was eliminated, however, there is a 0 lot line variance necessary on the north side bordering the Crosstown Highway. Mr. Dahl showed a sample of the textured concrete that will be the exterior material of the ramp. The ramp will also use glass and aluminum wall for a portion of its exterior. He presented the proposed design of the skyway over France Avenue. Member Kelly asked if any signage was proposed for the skyway. Mr. Enger replied that the Skyway would not have any signage. Dr. Karen Porth, 6363 Fairview Physicians Office Building, Fairview Hospital Chief of Staff, urged the Council to approve the expansion plans. She reported an increased need for medical staff and technology to improve patient care. Dr. Porth said there has been a large increase in heart and vascular illness as our population ages. Technological advances also have increased the amount of procedures available to care for patients. Physicians and patients want this care available to them in an integrated facility and Fairview must expand to meet this need. Fairview has a wonderful group of physicians committed to serving patient needs, but to stay competitive and retain these physicians they must expand. Mr. Enger concluded thanking the Council for the time and urged Council move the expansion plans forward as soon as possible. Public Comment Bruce Carlson, owner of Southdale Medical Building, stated he wanted to present their future plans. Currently Mr. Carlson said his building is at fifty percent capacity for the allowed floor area ratio (FAR) under Edina's zoning code. Mr. Carlson indicated that he intends to expand up to sixty -nine percent of the allowed FAR. He said he supported the hospital's request for expansion. Mr. Carlson showed graphic boards depicting a conceptual potential expansion of his medical office building. It would include a 69,000 square foot office expansion with 75 underground parking spaces and a 1/2 half level ramp addition. The proposed three -story building would permit the Minnesota Heart Group to occupy the entire first floor. Mr. Carlson indicated that his building is presently 95% occupied and he is not currently before the Council with an expansion request. He added he supported the hospital's expansion, but wished that Fairview Southdale would allow the Southdale Medical Office Building to expand. Page 6 �3 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 Norbert Weninger, 6566 France Avenue South, Board Chair, Point of France, reviewed the points made in his letter to the Council. Mr. Weninger pointed out the ramp and expansion will increase traffic that is already a nightmare. He added the height of the ramp is of great concern to the fifty residents who have homes facing the ramp. Point of France residents' other concern include the exterior surface of the parking ramp, surface water runoff, and the precedent set by allowing a skyway. Elmer Johnson,- 6566 France Avenue, Point of France resident, for twenty years asked if the hospital's ramp could be depressed into the ground. Bob Clinton, 6712 Rosemary Lane, asked if the proposed ramp will be free or a pay to park ramp. Mike Callas, 4930 West 77th Street, Edina Chamber of Commerce, stated he was representing Pat Tucker. Mr. Callas explained the Chamber understood the issues and concerns, however they still support the proposed expansion. He read the following Chamber resolution into the record: "EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Fairview Southdale 2000 -2002 Expansion Project WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital is the Twin Cities' eighth largest hospital and has a reputation for outstanding patient care; and WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital, a non - profit organization, is Edina's largest year -round employer at more than 2000 employees, a good steward of the Edina Community and committed to meeting the needs of its immediate service area; and WHEREAS, the demographics of the Edina area point to increased demands for cardiovascular services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Edina Chamber of Commerce does hereby support the Fairview Southdale 2000 -2002 Expansion Project to increase its capacity to serve patients, families and the community. Adopted by the Edina Chamber of Commerce the 151h day of March, 2000." Hugh Thompson, 6301 Colony Way, stated he had two concerns. The first is traffic which is horrendous and secondly, what is the purpose of the surveying on Drew and 65th Street. Bill Bellows, 6566 France Avenue, asked about what type of greenery was planned for the parking structure's roof. Mr. Bellows also expressed concern over reflection from the aluminum used in the skyway and glass wall design of the elevator and atrium. Laurel Thompson, 6301 Colony Way, added she was concerned about all the costs incurred by the proposed expansion. Ms. Thompson asked who would pay for the building. Mayor Maetzold explained the hospital was responsible for any building expansion. The only costs to be decided would be any needed public improvements, such as streets, sidewalks, etc. Iver Ross, 7504 Colony Way, said that he has an office in the 4010 Building and many times now it takes 15 minutes to get home. Mr. Ross said the Colony already has problems with outside cars on their private street. Council Discussion/ Action Member Hovland made a motion seconded by Member Johnson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Page 7 4o Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 Mayor Maetzold asked if the hospital had considered building the parking structure underground and why if there are no plans to go higher is the ramp being oversized in the plans. Mr. Enger replied that it would have added over $1,000,000 to the cost of the ramp to build one level of the ramp underground. He added that while at this time the proposed expansion would serve the hospital for many years, they want to maintain the flexibility of further expansion if it becomes necessary in the future. Member Faust asked if a variance would be required to add to the ramp in the future. Mr. Larsen said that any future expansion to the ramp would require conditional use permit approval in the future, even without any need for a variance. Member Hovland asked about the lighting proposed for the ramp. Mr. Dahl said that the lighting would be downcast and the fixtures would be cut off fixtures to keep the light confined within the ramp to avoid any glare at Point of France. He added the lights could be directed northward also. Member Faust asked if all levels of the ramp would have handicapped access, whether security issues have been looked at with such a parking ramp and if employees will be charged to park in the ramp. Mr. Dahl said that there will be handicapped parking stalls clustered on each level of the ramp near the elevator. He added that his firm has designed a number of parking ramps and a number of security measures are rolled into each design. He said that his firm follows guidance during the design stage from a Minneapolis ordinance developed to deal specifically with such security issues. Mr. Enger added that the hospital currently has 24 -hour security and may need to add more resources when this expansion occurs. He informed the Council that hospital employees will be charged at a modest rate to park in the ramp. Mayor Maetzold asked how to ensure the Drew Avenue sidewalks are made a part of the project. Mr. Hughes answered that the sidewalk installation could be made a condition of the approval or Council could direct City staff to come back and hold a project hearing for the purpose of installing the improvement and assessing the cost to benefited property owners. Mayor Maetzold asked about the larger issue of requiring the hospital to pay a portion of the traffic improvements identified for the area. Mr. Hoffman explained that only portions of the improvements would be state aid eligible. He said that West 65th Street from Valley View is not a state aid street, so no gas tax funds could be used for that leg of the intersection improvements. He proposed that possible sources of funds would come from MnDOT for ramp improvements, gas tax on state aid street, special assessments to larger area, and a specified amount to be assigned to the ramp because of its location and impact on the surrounding area. Mr. Hughes explained that three legs of the intersection would be eligible for state aid funding and one would not. So one - fourth of the total cost must be funded locally as a special assessment to an area determined to be benefited from the improvement. Member Faust asked if the one - fourth share for the installation of the two stop lights would be around $100,000. Mr. Hoffman said that no feasibility has been done, but that could be a rough estimate. Member Hovland asked about potential costs of signalizing Xerxes Avenue and 641h Street. Mr. Hoffman said that again a portion could be funded through state aid and the rest would be local funding. He added this signal also involves Richfield. Member Hovland continued asking about the France Avenue bridge deck over the Crosstown Highway. Mr. Hoffman said this project currently is entirely funded by MnDOT, Hennepin County and the City. Page 8 filb� Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 Member Faust asked how an assessment might be calculated for widening of Drew Avenue. Mr. Hoffman said that would be determined by the Council. An assessment could be either a front foot or an- area assessment. Mayor Maetzold asked if the Council should become involved in the exterior finish of the parking ramp and landscaping in light of the Point of France residents' concerns. Mr. Hughes answered that Council could as part of the final development plan approval, specify building materials and to the extent that it pleases the Council to have said materials presented. He added that the City has typically not become involved in the colors, but has requested certain types of materials be used for exterior finishes. Mr. Hughes said that landscaping is also a part of final development plan approval. The Council may specify the type and or size of plantings they would like to see. He reminded the Council that developers must post landscaping bonds to ensure compliance with their approved plans. Member Hovland asked about Mr. Weninger's concern about storm water from the ramp flowing into Point of France's pond. Mr. Hoffman explained that would not happen, that the storm water would flow into a pipe directed further west along Valley View, leaving less water actually getting to the Point of France pond. Member Johnson asked if procedurally the Council should become involved in the details as raised this evening when either approving or denying such a request. He added that he still has concern about traffic issues and who is planning to pay for the improvements discussed this evening. Member Johnson indicated that he supported the hospital's expansion project, but wants assurance that the details will be taken care when approval is given. Mayor Maetzold noted these are very legitimate concerns. He said that perhaps the expansion of the hospital will act as a catalyst starting some necessary improvements in the area. Mayor Maetzold added that he drives France Avenue daily and in his experience at 7:00 a.m., there is not a problem with traffic. However, from 2:30 p.m. and later, gridlock is a problem in the area. Member Kelly stated he has a number of comments. He thanked the hospital for responding to concerns raised earlier. Elimination of the 65th Street variance and the addition of green space, changing the time of the ramp construction and providing additional ramp design were laudable. He stated he appreciated all the changes that indicate the hospital development team has listened and responded. Member Kelly also stated that he thinks everyone agrees that the hospital is a very important and valuable asset to the community; and expansion should go forward on this site. The question is what expansion should be approved and how should it look. Member Kelly voiced concern over the collateral impact of approving the expansion. He expressed grave concern over how all the pieces fit together and their impact on the entire area of the City. This has been Member Kelly's concern all along. Are the traffic solutions proposed today, solutions that will address continued growth in the particular area and the development that is contemplated from the Crosstown to the Galleria. Member Kelly stated that the Council must be responsible and take a global look at development in that particular area because it has already seen one additional plan come forward. He added that Southdale has been kicking around various plans and he would be reluctant to pursue development in a piecemeal fashion, not considering the collateral effect of such development. Member Kelly said he was deeply concerned that the collateral effect of the development has not been studied. In particular, he said that no a.m. traffic counts had been done. He said that addressing developer costs in the assessment period would be akin to closing the barn door after the horse is gone. In order to adequately address development, you must address how the costs are going to be covered in the Page 9 410 q 0 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 non state aid areas. Everyone has differing views of what the hospital's fair share of the improvement would be and waiting until the assessment leaves the City open to legal challenges if the hospital determines they are being unduly burdened. However, if an agreement is reached while working out the conditional use permit, the City avoids any further potential disagreement down the line. Member Kelly said that an agreement is needed prior to granting approval, and more detail is also needed on the traffic counts prior to approval. Member Kelly said that he did not want his comments interpreted as meaning that he thought the proposed expansion was a .poorly designed landscape plan, or that he does not favor expansion in the area. However, he stated that as discussed earlier; the Council should pause and study the area from the Galleria to the Crosstown, knowing that there will be expansion of medical and retail uses in the area. It should be found out how the pieces best fit together comprehensively. For this reason he would not support approval at this time, what he favors instead is taking some time to really study the area comprehensively. If, however, the Council decides to move forward he urged that they consider in the Conditional Use Permit the material and landscaping approval discussed, and make sure no signage be allowed on the skyway. Member Faust stated her main concern is the parking ramp and the Point of France residents. She said she believed the plans, as presented, for the parking ramp are very preliminary. The Council has not seen a definitive ramp plan and that should be presented before any approval is granted. Member Faust said that looking at the overall development in the area should have been done twenty years ago. She agreed it will be hard to develop further in this area because of all the traffic issues, but changing development standards now seems counter- productive. Member Hovland said he believes the core problem is traffic just like in many other parts of the City. However, the hospital is not the generator of most of the traffic. Hindsight says that better planning twenty years ago would leave us with more options. However, the City must do the best it can with what is available in a compressed area. Personally, Member Hovland thinks the hospital has come up with good ideas in a tight area. He likes the parking ramp on the west side of France Avenue with the skyway across to the hospital. He agrees with no signage being allowed on the skyway. Member Hovland stated that conditions should be inserted into the conditional use permit or developer's agreement covering: landscape plan being satisfactory to staff, making sure that lighting is appropriately downcast to protect neighbors, and that the exterior building materials and skyway design be incorporated into the an agreement with the hospital. He said that issues involving state aid, gas tax, or special assessments, could be dealt with subsequent in time to approving the project. Member Hovland asked staff if the entire area of the project could be defined and then the allocation of cost dealt with later, so as not to make it a condition of approving the final development plan or conditional use permit. Mr. Hughes said he thought that separating the improvements made sense because they are all off -site of the hospital campus. They are part of intersections the City controls and the issue later becomes allocation of the cost of the improvements. Mayor Maetzold asked if the cost allocation could be done based upon the number of employees. Mr. Hughes replied he had never heard of that formula, but a close corollary would be assessments levied based upon floor area instead of lot area. Member Hovland acknowledged the concerns of Point of France and said they could be addressed. However, he questioned whether the City could regulate the structure of the parking ramp foundation. Member Hovland said he believed the Comprehensive Plan has already been put into place with one area of concern, Southdale. He said the quadrant where all the medical buildings are located may in the future become an even more expanded medical facility and maybe that entire expansion would be great news for the entire community. Member Hovland Page 10 A10 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 added that he thought the expansion of the hospital was fantastic, that perhaps Fairview would become a regional medical center. Member Hovland acknowledged traffic is a problem to be resolved. As future developments come forward the Council's job will be- to review each project He expressed concern over the Southdale shopping area. However, if the medical quadrant continues to grow, perhaps an extended stay hotel will develop or some additional shopping capabilities for Southdale. Perhaps the medical quadrant could even become a mini "Mayo'. Member Hovland believes that conditions could be placed upon approvals protecting Point of France, which the developer has indicated being amenable to, so he favored moving forward. Mayor Maetzold agreed with Member Hovland. He also agreed with Member Kelly's concern for France Avenue. Mayor Maetzold supported moving ahead with the hospital expansion at this time. He suggested that Member Kelly's suggestion of more comprehensive plan of the area, however, be pursued with the City's Vision 20/20 planning process. Member Johnson asked a procedural question about the action required. He wanted to know if a list of conditions could be attached to the approvals. Mayor Maetzold asked staff if the conditions could be contained under the final development plan and conditional use permit. Mr. Hughes responded that the Council should either approve or deny the resolution on the EAW, then conditions with respect to cost of surrounding street system would be best addressed with the final development plan, and any conditions dealing with the ramp should be part of the conditional use permit. Member Kelly asked for clarification from the City Attorney on the best method of handling the cost issues associated with the development. Attorney Boelter said that perhaps traffic issues should be attached to both the final development plan and the conditional use permit. Member Faust interjected that she wanted to see a parking ramp design, not just the potential materials. Motion by Member Hovland, seconded by Member Johnson introducing the following resolution and moving its approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-38 CITY OF EDINA A RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital is the proposer of the project consisting of a 174,000 square foot expansion to the west and north of the existing facility, a four - level, 970 - vehicle parking ramp west of France Avenue, and an east/west connection via a skyway, located in the city of Edina (the "City "); and WHEREAS, the city of Edina is the Responsible Governmental Unit pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.0500, and WHEREAS, the EAW was prepared using the form approved by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board for EAW's in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1300; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1500, the EAW was completed and distributed on January 31, 2000 to all persons and agencies on the official Environmental Quality Board distribution list; and WHEREAS, the notification of the EAW was published in the Minnesota EQB Monitor on February 7,2000; and WHEREAS, the public review and comment period remained open until March 8,2000; and WHEREAS, the comments on the EAW were received and responded to; and WHEREAS, this decision is made in compliance with the time schedule provided in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700; and Page 11 A 10% Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 WHEREAS, the record considered by the City Council for purposes of it decision herein consists of the EAW, related reports and analysis; the comments received thereon, and the responses to such comments, all of which are incorporated herein and made a part of this decision; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, acting with respect to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion, that it finds and concludes the following: 1. The .EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota Policy Act and Minnesota Rules, Parts 4410.1000 to 4410.1700, and 2. The EAW satisfactorily addressed all of the issues for which existing information could have been reasonably obtained; and 3. The findings of fact contained in Exhibit A (attached) are made; and 4. Based on criteria established in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, and the findings of fact, the Project does not have a potential for significant environmental effects; and 5. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the City of Edina therefore makes a "Negative Declaration ". Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota this 4th day of April, 2000. Roll call: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Maetzold Nay: Kelly Resolution adopted on a 4 -1 vote. Member Hovland made a motion to approve the final development plan and conditional use permit. Mayor Maetzold seconded the motion. Motion died. Member Johnson suggested that conditions be attached to the approval, by either amendment or delay. He stated he wants to see the conditions and wants them well thought out. Member Hovland said that in the past the Council has crafted the conditions at the final hearing. Member Kelly stated he did not see how the cost issues can be addressed at this time and that he had previously pointed out the flaws of moving to a special assessment improvement. Member Hovland asked Members Kelly and Johnson how they would suggest an agreement be reached with the hospital on the cost allocation. Member Kelly said that after the costs are known; a reasonable apportionment be mutually agreed upon with all concerned parties. If this is not done, during the assessment process the City is open to legal challenges. Member Hovland asked why not use the special assessment process to ascertain the allocation. He said he felt the approval should be moved forward and let the special assessment process take care of the allocation of the improvement costs. Otherwise, in his opinion there would be an unfair delay to the hospital. He stated that he felt it would be more fair to use the due process of a special assessment project. Member Kelly disagreed, stating that taxpayers could be subjected to additional expenses of legal defense of an assessment. Mayor Maetzold stated he agreed with Member Hovland that the special assessment process should be allowed to take care of the cost allocation. If approval is delayed two weeks there would still be others who should have a share of the cost that would not be able to. be brought into the mix. In Mayor Maetzold's opinion following a special assessment process would be the most equitable way to proceed. Member Kelly stated he was not advocating the hospital pay more than a fair share, just that the share be decided before any approval. Member Johnson noted that Mr. Enger had stated earlier he would be willing to work with the City in paying a fair portion of the needed improvements. He suggested that City staff work with the hospital to achieve an agreement for cost apportionment. Member Johnson said that he would be prepared to vote on the expansion at the next Council Page 12 A-(p Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 meeting if something can be agreed to between the City and the hospital. Member Faust asked that the Drew Avenue sidewalk be included in the discussion. Member Kelly made a motion continuing action until April 18, 2000, on the final development plan and conditional use permit request of Fairview Southdale Hospital and directing staff: to negotiate a cost sharing agreement with respect to the improvements at Valley View Road and West 65th Street, and Drew Avenue; to provide additional details as to the ramp design, and to develop the conditions necessary for said approvals. Member Faust seconded the motion. Member Johnson stated he would support the motion, however, he did not want to dictate materials, etc. to the hospital. Member Hovland noted that a month ago when he saw this plan he was very concerned about costs. His first impression was that the hospital should pay all the costs. However, upon further reflection, he decided using the special assessment method would be better. Mr. Enger asked that Southdale Medical Center be made a part of any cost sharing negotiation involving the proposed improvements. Mayor Maetzold told Mr. Enger that this would be decided upon by City staff. Ayes: Faust, Johnson, Kelly Nay: Hovland, Maetzold Motion carried on a 3 -2 vote. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -39 LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 5000 AND 5004 KELSEY TERRACE (CARL HANSEN) Motion made by Member Johnson and .seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION 2000 -39 WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present single tracts of land: Lots 18 and 19, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision as follows: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 18, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying north of the south 10.59 feet thereof. PARCEL B: Lot 19, and the south 10.59 feet of Lot 18, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said newly created Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land (PARCEL A and PARCEL B) as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 Page 13 Alto Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 WHEREAS, he Edina City Council on the 4th of April, 2000, fixed a date for a Council hearing on th.6,proposed street reconstruction, Improvement No. A -189/a-nd WHEREAS, ten ays' mailed notice and two weeks' publishe otice of the hearing was given, and the hea 'ng was held thereon on the 2nd day of M , 2000, for Improvement No. A -189 resurfacing S ool Road from West 60th Street to Co cord Avenue, Ruth Drive, and West 59th Street, at wh h time all persons desiring to be h rd were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT \na D that the Co ncil has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and beivised oft pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the constructiimprove nt, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domacquisi on of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be ren all bsequent proceedings as Improvement Project No. A -189 resurfacing Schom est 60th Street to Concord Avenue, Ruth Drive, and West 59th Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED Improv nt Project No. A -189 resurfacing School Road from West 60th Street to Concord Avenu , Rut Drive, and West 59th Street is hereby ordered as proposed, pending further revie of the uth Drive and West 59th Street portion of the improvement, after bids are recei ed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED/that the City F this improvement. The engi eer shall cause making of such improvem t. r is hereby designated as the engineer for and specifications to be prepared for the BE IT FURTHER RESO VED, that the City Enginee 's hereby authorized to advertise for bids and receive same f r the aforementioned improvem ts, noting that alternate bids are to be received showing 1yest 59th Street and Ruth Drive sep tely from School Road. Passed and adopted his 2nd day of May, 2000. Member Hovland s conded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, H eland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION 2000 -53 ADOPTED APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL (6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH) BUILDING EXPANSION AND PARKING RAMP AND RESOLUTION 2000 -54 ADOPTED APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PARKING STRUCTURE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen said that after the April 4, 2000, public hearing Fairview Hospital responded to the concerns raised by the Council by: Page 3 A- 111 Minutes/Edina City CouncilJMay 2, 2000 • BRW,: Inc. conducted a.m. traffic counts in order: to compare them to the p.m. counts used for their original study. The counts demonstrated that p.m. counts were higher than a.m.:counts.and were appropriate to use for the study. Submitted a revised landscaping plan illustrating additional , and larger stock than what had been offered in writing at. the April 4, 2000, meeting. • Project architects have done additional work on design, and materials for the proposed ramp. • Two phases for road improvements. Phase 1 would be a widening of Drew Avenue to accommodate three traffic lanes and a six =foot sidewalk on the west side of the "street between 65. and 66+x. Street. The sidewalk would be pavers to tie into the 661 Street sidewalk. Southdale Medical's owners have agreed . to grant the necessary sidewalk easement. Funding for Phase 1 would be, 100% through special. assessment. to the hospital, Southdale Medical, and the medical office building at 6363 France Avenue. The assessment would be allocated on a floor area basis. The estimated project cost is $155,000.00 ♦ Phase 2 would be the reconstruction of West 65th Street west of France Avenue and the reconstruction of the intersection of Valley View Road and West _65t' Street. The project would include an expansion of the ramp, addition of signals, reconstruction of the intersection and rehabilitation of the,.pavement. The West 65th portion of the improvement is not a municipal state aid street so it would be funded by a 100% assessment. This portion of the project is estimated at $194,000. The remainder of proposed improvements are estimated at $950,000:00 with approximately $712,500.00 eligible for state aid funding leaving an additional $237,500.00 to be assessed. The hospital, Southdale Medical, the medical office building at 6363 France Avenue, and all properties abutting West 65th Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road would be included in the assessment area for this improvement. • Fairview Southdale Hospital and the owner of the medical office building at 7373 France Avenue have agreed to waive their right of appeal for any special assessment that does not exceed the Engineer s estimate; retaining the right to appeal any portion of an assessment exceeding the same. Member Johnson asked why only the hospital was used in calculating the floor area, not the parking structure. Mr. Hughes explained that the City views the parking structure as an accessory building to the hospital. For this reason the parking structure was not used in calculating the special assessments the hospital would be responsible for. Mr. Larsen reviewed the suggested conditions for approval of both the Final Development Plan and the Conditional Use Permit as follows: Final Development Plan Conditions: 1. Watershed District Permits. 2. Landscaping Plan dated, 4/20/00 and bond. 3. Exterior materials shall be brick, marble and glass matching materials on hospital. Page 4i �`a. Minutes/Edina City Council/May, 2, 2000 4. Agreement by hospital and .the owners of 6363 France Avenue to waive their right of appeal of special . assessments for off -site improvements subject to term of the agreement signed by all parties and on file at City Hall: Conditional Use Permit Conditions: 1. Design and materials detailed on ramp plan as presented May 2, 2000 to City Council. 2. Landscaping Plan dated, 4/20/00 and bond. 3. All lighting in parking structure and on the site containing the structure shall be shaded so as to concentrate illumination on -site and within the structure.- .4. No signage on the skyway. Proponent Presentation Richard Dahl, BWBR Architects, reviewed the revised plans, using graphics and actual samples of the materials intended for use in the ramp. Mr. Dahl explained the stair: tower curtain wall will be clear anodized aluminum and green tinted glazing. The elevator tower. will be -brick, matching the hospital. This will be covered by a clear anodized aluminum fascia and soffit. The ramp will consist of poured in place concrete walls with sand textured acrylic coating. The wall adjacent to the brick elevator tower and curtain wall will be light taupe with the span of the building a combination of light and dark taupe. The .columns will be cast in place concrete painted a dark earth tone. Mr. Dahl also reviewed the proposed landscaping and berm. Member Faust expressed.her disappointment with the design as proposed. She stated she had specifically asked that the parking structure design complement',the existing and proposed hospital. Member Faust stated that in her opinion the designers had not done as requested. Member Hovland and Mayor Maetzold disagreed with Member Faust. They stated that in their opinions and experience the proposed design was a good attempt at blending the new hospital addition and ramp with existing buildings and designs. Member Kelly stated in his opinion the hospital proposal is an over building of the site and he still would have liked to. seen a more comprehensive study ' of the. area before proceeding. However, he believes that the hospital is a good citizen and good for the community. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2000 -53 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Final Development Plan revision dated May 2, 2000, for Fairview Southdale Medical Center, Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, located at 6401 France Avenue presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 2, 2000, be and is hereby approved conditioned upon: 1. Watershed District Permits. 2. Landscaping -Plan dated, 4/20/00 and bond. 3. Exterior materials shall be brick, marble and glass matching materials on hospital. 4. Agreement by hospital and the owners of 6363. France Avenue to waive their right of appeal of special assessments for off -site improvements subject to terms of the agreement signed by all parties and on file at City Hall. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Page 5 N3 " . Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Nay: Faust Motion carried. Member Johnson, made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-54 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES PARKING STRUCTURE WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Code Section 850 (the Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Code Section No. 850.04 Subd. 4_have been satisfied: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Fairview Health Services conditioned upon the following: 1. Design and materials detailed on ramp plan as presented May 2, 2000 to City Council. 2. . Landscaping Plan dated, 4/20/00 and bond. 3. All lighting in parking structure and on the site containing the structure shall be shaded so as to concentrate illumination on -site and within the structure. 4. No signage on the skyway. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of May, 2000. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Nay: Faust Motion carried. r *PRELIMINARY REZONING AND\ GRANDVIEW SOUARE CONTINUED\Tl and seconded by Member Hovland \ Development Plan for Grandview. Square, Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. Mayor Maetzold excused himself from the j ►AXLE L� V GLV11V1 1V 1. 1 LtX1V. Vl lJp <.Ltil \1\ MAY 16, 2000 M ion made by Member Johnson ntinuing Prel' inary- Rezoning and Overall on Clark/Op Development until May 16, 2000. nain4er of the meeting at 8:05 P.M. ACTION TABLED UNTIL MAY 16, 2000, ON SECTION 450 - SWIMMING POOLS Sanitarian elf ordinance amendment was to bring Edina's c de i amendment would address three items in the imm . access barriers, and chlorine concentration. 7V Mr. Velde stated the first section would a. a spa pool. Spa pools are typical 30 to 34 area. Mr. Velde said staff believed this rO L1Vt11N% -JU 1VV LVVV -V:J - t11V1L'1V L11V l.I explained the reason for the proposed o compliance with state statute. The Poll Code: spa pool deck elevations, v the required c :hes in height al )n would not in Page 6 k to be lower than the, top rim of 1 0 larger than 100 square feet in �rfe e with live saving efforts. The A-1 0 Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: May 17, 2013 To: Cary Teague - Community Development Director From: Wayne Houle - Director of Engineering Re: Fairview Southdale Emergency Center Expansion Dated April 24, 2013 MEMO A. rOk a H 0 �O � �O Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plan and offer the following comments: O A Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. O An agreement should be drafted and executed regarding maintenance of the water system including fire hydrants. O Replace all hydrants on property to new standard. Boundary Survey • The boundary survey shows many easements located within existing building footprint. The easements should be vacated and or modified. • Show watermain along east side of hospital. Civil Sheet C303: • Provide fire -truck turning radius for roundabout. Civil Sheet C500: • Inspect sanitary sewer line below parking ramp. • Provide inflow and infiltration study of parking ramp. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. G: \PW\ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS\F Streets \6401 France Ave (Southdale Hospital)\2013 Addition \Staff Review \2013051. WH -Edina Review 6401 France.doc Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Brandi Westbrook <brandi.granlund @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:56 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: brandi.granlund @yahoo.com Subject: Case File 2013.011 Site Plan Review RE: Case File 2013.011 Logal Description: RLS No. 1716 Site Plan Review - Fairview Southdale Hospital I received a letter recently with a description stating possible site plan development for properties owners within 1000 feet. The expansion includes an 89,000 square foot emergency expansion to the north side of the existing hospital. I personally own property at 6312 Barrie Road. I am NOT opposed to the expansion of the hospital if I am paid fairly for my property. If this is the case, I would be in approval for this Fairview Southdale Hospital expansion. Thank you, Brandi Granlund - Westbrook Jackie Hoogenakker From: Gnorbymn <gnorbymn @aol.com> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 8:14 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file 2013.011 To Whom It May Concern, I live at the Colony at Edina, I received the letter regarding the fairview expansion. I was under the impression you have already approved this expansion since the bid was already accepted and the building is to be built starting in Mar 14. 1 live directly on the crosstown, I have no use what so ever of my deck due to the noise from the freeway. The heliport has late night arrivals on a regular basis that wake me up during the night. Then when the airport decided to change the landing and take off path to go over the crosstown I get every two minute departures or arrivals right over my condo. I will camp out in my den which is in the middle of my condo with only one window facing east. My bedroom faces fairview hospital. If the city of Edina would lower the speed limit on crosstown say between xerxes and France down to 35 or 40 miles per hour it would be much quieter here and I could use my deck. In st.paul they have a stretch of freeway that has a much lower speed limit due to houses being close to the freeway. So if the ultimate plan is to actually not have the entrance be on France for the emergency room and try to sneek it in by expanding heritage drive past the nursing homes and directly in front of my front door I am against it. I see many planners outside here looking at the grassy area in front of my condo. If that is the plan to put a road parallel to crosstown to an emergency room entrance that would be unacceptable to keep me up all night with ambulance arrivals. Sincerely Gretchen Norby 6304 barrie road Edina,MN 55435 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Noonan Bill <bwnoon @earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013.10:18 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file 2013 -011 Fairview Hospital expansion Edina Planning Commission I received the letter to all property owners within 1000 feet of the project. My address is 6204 Chowen, which is one block north of the project. Your letter didn't state if the height of the buildings will increase. My concern is that increase height will increase noise reflection off the expanded buildings if they go up a couple more floor. We have perhaps have one of the noisiest neighborhoods in Edina. This includes the new concentration of airplane traffic routes, normal Hwy 62 traffic, hospital bound ambulances, and there are no sound barriers next to the highway. Please do what you can to limit noise increase. Solutions: Ask the architect to deflect the building exterior noise in multiple directions. We might even get a better looking building as a result. Make sure that the State and Hennepin County traffic planning include noise barriers in future Hwy 62 expansion. Thank you. Bill Noonan H 952 - 922 -3385 C 612 - 804 -2535 o e A 10, In • f �CORPOliP�4'O • 188A To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.B. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion 0 Date: June 4, 2013 Information Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Final Rezoning from PCD -3 to PUD, Final Development Plan and Final Plat at 7171 France Avenue for Lund Food Holdings: Ordinance No. 2013 -6, Resolution No. 2013 -45. Action Requested: Adopt the attached Ordinance establishing the PUD Zoning District and approve the Resolution, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Information /Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision.— July 21, 2013) Lund Food Holdings is requesting final review for a proposal to tear down the existing 59,000 Byerly's grocery store, located at 7171 France Avenue and build the following: Phase 1 ➢ A new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store. ➢ A six /seven -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking. (Building A.) Phase 2 ➢ A six /seven -story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,711 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking. (Building B.) ➢ A six - story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. (Building C.) In building the first phase, the new Byerly's store would be constructed in the parking lot of the existing store at the northwest corner of the site, and Building A would be constructed in the southeast corner of the site. The existing store. would remain open. When the new store is finished the existing store would be removed, and then Buildings B & C would be constructed. This request has already received the following approvals from the City Council: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; ➢ Preliminary Development Plan; and ➢ Preliminary Plat City of Edina • 4801 W. SO'h St • Edina, MN SS424 1. •.& L There were 18 conditions attached to the preliminary approvals. The applicant has addressed each of those conditions, and how they meet those conditions in an addendum to their narrative on pages A14e —A14k of the planning commission staff report.) The applicant is also requesting revision of two conditions that are recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. 1. To allow the secondary free standing sign off Hazelton Road to be 100 square feet in size, rather than 50 square feet. 2. Park Dedication to be paid at the time of certificate of occupancy, rather than at the time of issuance of a building permit. The following is therefore requested for this final review: ➢ Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; (Including a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD Zoning District.) ➢ Final Development Plan; and ➢ Final Plat Planning Commission Recommendation: On May 22, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Rezoning to PUD, Final Development Plan and Final Plat subject to the findings and conditions in the Planning Commission staff report. (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2013 -45 & Ordinance No. 2013 -6 • Promenade Preliminary Concept Design date stamped May 29, 2013 • Draft minutes from the May 22, 2013, Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, May 22, 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-45 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM PCD -3, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & FINAL PLAT AT 7171 FRANCE FOR LUND FOOD HOLDINGSMOUNT PROPERTIES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Lund Food Holdings is requesting a rezoning from PCD -3 to PUD, Planned Unit Development, a Preliminary Development Plan and a Preliminary Plat, to build a new 47,000 square foot Byerly's store; a six /seven -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a six /seven- story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,450 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking; and a six - story, 60 -unit apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Legal Descriptions 1.03 On May 22, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requests subject to the Conditions Outlined in the May 22, 2013, Planning Commission Staff Report. 1.04 On June 4, 2013, the City Council considered the requests. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center - MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. CITY OF EDINA 4801• West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov 9 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-45 Page Two 5. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. 6. The applicant is also proposing sustainability principles within their project narrative, and pledges an energy efficiency standard that would exceed the code driven energy efficiency standard by a minimum of 5 %. 7. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. 8. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. d. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat subject to the following conditions: RESOLUTION NO. 2013-45 Page Two 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Utility plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped April 26, 2013 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted,, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one -year after City Council approval. If the plat is not filed it shall be deemed null and void. 6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. A portion of the park dedication funds shall be used to develop the water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value of the easement shall be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit. 8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 17, 2012; including the development agreement. 9. All public utility, roadway and sidewalk easements shall be dedicated to the City. 10. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10 %. 11. No delivery truck traffic shall be allowed on 70th Street. 12. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 13. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 14. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. A portion of the park dedication funds shall be used to develop the water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value of the easement would be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-45 Page Two Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 4, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 4, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2013. City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 7171 FRANCE AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD) Subd. 4. Planned Unit Development District -4 (PUD -4) — 71 France A. Legal Description: Lots 1 -4, Block 1, 71 France Addition, Hennepin County. B. Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re- development plans received by the City on April 26, 2013, except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2013- , on file in the Office of the Planning Department under file number 2013- 004.13a. C. Principal Uses: All principal and conditional uses allowed in the Planned Commercial District -3 (PCD -3) D. Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the Planned Commercial District -3 (PCD -3) E. Conditional Uses: (None Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX r F. Development Standards. Development standards per the PCD -3 Zoning District, except the following:' !Building Setbacks' Max. Hqt. !Front — France Avenue 50 feet (Front — Hazelton Road 24 feet ;Side — North 22 feet Side — East (lot line setback) 46 feet Side — East (Promenade setback) 11 feet (Story 1) 100 s.f. (France Ave) 22 feet (Story 2 -8) !Rear — South 1.1 feet (Story 1) 50 s.f. (Hazelton Rd.) 40 feet (Story 2 -8) ,Building Height eight stories or 108 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio 80% Parking Stalls (Residential) 350 enclosed & 33 surface Parking Stalls (Retail) 314 stalls Signage Type Max. Number Max. Area Max. Hqt. Building ID Residential One per building 12 s.f. 6 ft Building /store ID Retail One per bldg. front 15% of wall area N/A Freestanding (Retail) One per entrance 100 s.f. (France Ave) 20 ft: 50 s.f. (Hazelton Rd.) 20 ft. Neighborhood ID Sign One per street front 60 s.f. 2 ft: Promenade 25 s.f. 7 ft. Directional monument 6 s.f. 4 ft. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication: Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS. my hand and seal of said City this day of 12013. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text — XXXX Added text -XXXX REOLCATE FIBER OPTIC SCULPTURAL WATER FEATURE SWINGING BENCH (TYP..) �IlI t� O PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (TYP.) BROOK CROSSING FEATURE CONNECT TO B' • Ngpp DEVELOPMENT �c'J) WALK / : , `�. \ � G BABBLING BROOK CASCADE D 25 50 866 SCALE o o 865 864 869 9i BUILDING FFE 869.6 63 BROOK CROSSING FEATURE 2.5' MAX. DRY STACKED WALL 10'COLORID CONCRETE WALK I�I POND ELEV. 862 HARD EDGE AT WATER —' MANHOLES TO BE CAPPED BELOW GRADE I / 862 BROOK CROSSING FEATURE 2.5' MAX. DRY STACKED WALL— 4'CONCRETE WALK \ 86 4 t '. BYERLY'S FRANCE AVE. REDEVELOPMENT 863 HOUSING BUILDING'A' 862 _ • _ BABBLING BROOK AT 1.5% FALL 861 ( 1 BROOK CROSSING FEATURE ---- -'/1 /�"3 �— CONNECTION FOR BICYCLES TO i _ ___ _ __ ______ - CONDOMINIUMS i 1 X I � FUTURE WATER FEATUREi r5j ELEVATION 855 SCULPTURAL WATER BASIN (END OF - BABBLING BROOK) BROOK CROSSING FEATURE) I / ET-� !� `1 1 EXISTING TRA1l-(TYR.) � \ 1 -- \ ! EXISTING TREE (TYP.) ------------ ---- --- - -( FUTURE TRAIL LOOP ` �> 8$ � I BERM CITY CITY OF EDINA / PROMENADE IMPROVEMENTS / / PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN MAY 29, 2013 8$5 Ulls r CONNECT NEW TRAIL TO CIRCLE 9$4 Discussion A discussion ensued with Commis ' ners in agreement that the to ould be unbuildable without a variance, adding t/are cal difficulties to support gr ing the variance. Motion Commissioner m pproval bas on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner econded the motion. All ted aye; motion carried. O�J B. Final Rezoning, Final Development and Final Plat. Anderson -KM Builders ( Byerly's) 7171 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Lund Food Holdings is requesting final review for a proposal to tear down the existing 59,000 Byerly's grocery store, located at 7171 France Avenue and build the following in phases. The first phase would include a new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store and a six /seven -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking (Building A). Phase two would include a six /seven -story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,711 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking. (Building B.) and lastly a six - story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. (Building C.) Teague-said this In building the first phase, the new Byerly's store would be constructed in the parking lot of the existing store at the northwest corner of the site, and Building A would be constructed in the southeast corner of the site. The existing store would remain open. When the new store is finished the existing store would be removed, and then Buildings B & C would be constructed. Continuing, Teague explained preliminary approvals have been granted and at this time the applicant is seeking the following for this final review; Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; (Including a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD Zoning District.), Final Development Plan; and Final Plat Teague further explained that the underlying zoning of the property would be PCD -3, therefore, would be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. The applicant has submitted a signage plan to approve for the overall development. The locations and size of pylon signs, wall signs and way finding signs are included in the PUD regulations for this site. This site is unique as a unified development, with four separate lots, four buildings, including three separate retail and three separate residential buildings. Site way finding will be important. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommds that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, and Final Development Plan to build a new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store; a 6/7 -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a 6/7- story, 77 -unit apartment building with first floor 10,711 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking; and a six -story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. Approval is also subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. 5. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. 6. The applicant is also proposing sustainability principles within their project narrative, and pledges an energy efficiency standard that would exceed the code driven energy efficiency standard by a minimum of 5 %. 7. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. 8. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies'of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. d. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Utility plan date'stamped April 26, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped April 26, 2013 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one -year after City Council approval. If the plat is not filed it shall be deemed null and void. 6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. A portion of the park dedication funds shall be used to develop the water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value of the easement shall be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit. 8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 17, 2012. 9. All public utility, roadway and sidewalk easements shall be dedicated to the City. 10. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10 %. 11. No delivery truck traffic shall be allowed on 70th Street. 12. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. Teague further recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat to create a new four lot subdivision at 7171 France for the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 3. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 4. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. A portion of the park dedication funds shall be used to develop the water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value of the easement would be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit. Appearing for the applicant Jim Vos, Cresa Applicant Presentation Mr. Vos delivered a power point presentation highlighting the changes to the proposal from preliminary to final and responding to the conditions stipulated by staff. Vos stated for the most part the final plans address previous issues, adding there are changes and minor clarifications. Vos did note that final plans contain an expanded store mezzanine and the addition of the requested architectural detail on the north face. Vos stated that housing remains relatively unchanged, though the exterior materials have been upgraded. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Mr. Vos if Macy's and the property to the east (Wolfson) are on board. Mr. Vos responded at this time they have presented temporary construction licenses and /or reciprocal access easement agreements to both Macy's and Wolfson's. Vos added he meets with Mr. Wolfson tomorrow to finalize their agreements. Chair Staunton commented that in general he finds the signage package complimentary but questions the height of the sign at the roundabout /Hazelton. Staunton asked Vos to speak to the signage package. Commissioners Scherer and Forrest expressed concerns with the signage package. Mr. Vos explained that the signage package includes monument signs and their locations and size, way finding signage and wall signs. In response to Chair Staunton's question on signage near the roundabout Vos explained that the sign is needed at a specific height due to the roundabouts interior height. Vos also pointed out that signage is important because this site contains four parcels with two uses and signage has to accommodate both pedestrian and vehicular way finding. Commissioner Platteter also commented about the height of the pylon sign as previously mentioned by Chair Staunton. Vos reiterated that the intent of this sign is to enhance way finding and the height is needed because of the design of the roundabout. Platteter further questioned if signage facing the Promenade should match other Promenade signs. A lengthy discussion ensued on signage especially the way the proposed way finding sign addresses the Promenade. Commissioner Scherer stated she would like to see the City develop a consistent sign "package" along the Promenade and for other parks. Scherer noted that currently signage is prohibited from facing a park. Chair Staunton acknowledged that currently the Ordinance prohibits signs facing City parks; however, that was the result of a conscious effort by the City to develop the Centennial Lakes area with the rear of the retail buildings facing the park; with no signage facing park property. Since the initial development of this area the Promenade has been greatly enhanced and it is becoming part of the Centennial Lakes park system. The question now is how to address signage on the "park ". The discussion continued on signage with Commissioners expressing the need for amending the sign ordinance to address park signage and other Commissioners in favor of the signs as presented; noting flexibility is needed in way finding and in opening up the site to everyone including walkers of the Promenade. Mr. Vos commented that Byerly's would be the first site along the Promenade inviting the public into their area to share their amenities. Planner Teague pointed out that this request is for a PUD rezoning which is the reason a signage package was included. Teague reminded Commissioners a PUD rezoning is site specific. This sign "package" is only for this site; this project. Commissioner Grabiel asked Mr. Vos to speak to drainage and underground water storage. Mr. Vos explained with the aid of graphics water flow, percolation, Swedish storage system, pipe gallery, swale and rain gardens. Commissioner Platteter asked Mr. Vos the reasoning behind the covered sidewalk. Mr. Vos explained that the corporate office likes the idea of a covered sidewalk, adding it is part of the plan. Platteter said from his experience covered walkways don't always age well. Platteter stated he isn't in favor of deferring the parkland dedication fee as suggested by the applicant. Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant to present the exterior materials board. Mr. Holmes, Pope Architects, told the Commission that the building materials for the retail component and housing would be complementary. The freestanding store would consist of a metal roof edge and fascia, insulated glass in aluminum frame storefront system, precast concrete panels, scored, buff color, standing seam metal roofing and metal coping, and a manufactured stone base with brick on precast panel. The columns and pilasters are natural stone veneer. Continuing, Holmes stated the housing element would include metal coping, aluminum sunscreen, stucco, insulated vision glass in aluminum frame systems, stucco sign band for retail Building A and varying shades of brick. Public Hearine No public comment. Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Motion Commissioner Carr moved to recommend Final Rezoning, Final Development and Final Plat approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Scherer asked Commissioners Carr and Grabiel if they would accept an amendment to their motion that would include an additional condition that any signage proposed to face the Promenade "be held" until the City approves an ordinance regulating signage facing City parks. Planner Teague responded that amending the sign ordinance with regard to signage facing City parks would be a big undertaking, adding careful thought must go into any amendments to the ordinance. He suggested that signage facing the park be in coordination with signs along the Promenade. Chair Staunton suggested that the amendment state that any sign facing the Promenade is consistent in size and appearance to what the City wants to see in signage on the Promenade. Commissioner Carr said she can't accept an amendment that would change the Ordinance; adding that would be too restrictive in her opinion. Carr pointed out the City stressed to the applicant during the preliminary review process and approval the importance of opening up their site to visitors of the park. Carr pointed out without adequate way finding signage visitors may feel they are trespassing on private property. Chair Staunton stated that amendment was not accepted by the mover. Chair Staunton asked Commissioners how they feel about deferring the Parkland Dedication on Building A until a certificate of occupancy is issued. Commissioner Carr stated in her opinion the applicant needs to determine the value of the easement area and the value of construction and deduct that from the total and present their findings to the City Council for their determination. Carr said she would like the applicant to calculate those figures before this proceeds to Council. Commissioners agreed to support the staff condition requiring that park dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit. Commissioner Carpenter stated he is generally supportive of the project with some reservations. Commissioner Grabiel stated he supports the project as presented adding he looks forward to this redevelopment. Commissioner Scherer stated she also supports the project; however, continues to have reservations on how signage addresses City parks. All voted aye; motion carried. 'w91�,r�'L� o� e �J � �o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague May 22, 2013 VI.B. Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Lund Food Holdings is requesting final review for a proposal to tear down the existing 59,000 Byerly's grocery store, located at 7171 France Avenue and build the following: Phase 1 ➢ A new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store. ➢ A six/seven -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking. (Building A.) Phase 2 ➢ A six/seven -story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,711 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking. (Building B.) ➢ A six -story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. (Building C.) (See site location on pages Al —A10) In building the first phase, the new Byerly's store would be constructed in the parking lot of the existing store at the northwest corner of the site, and Building A would be constructed in the southeast corner of the site. The existing store would remain open. When the new store is finished the existing store would be removed, and then Buildings B & C would be constructed. (See the applicant's narrative on pages A14a —A14k; the site plan and building renderings on pages Al 5—A28.) This request has already received the following approvals from the City Council: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; ➢ Preliminary Development Plan; and ➢ Preliminary. Plat (See attached Preliminary Development Plans on pages All 1 A14.) There were 18 conditions attached to the preliminary approvals. The applicant has addressed each of those conditions, and how they meet those conditions in an addendum to their narrative on pages A14e— A14k.) The following is therefore requested for this final review: ➢ Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; (Including a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD Zoning District.) ➢ Final Development Plan; and ➢ Final Plat SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Rue De France retail center; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided Mixed Use. Easterly: Vacant restaurant; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and Mixed Use. Southerly: Macy's Home Store; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and Mixed Use. Westerly: Sunrise senior living; zoned PSR -4, Planned Senior Residential and guided Office /Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 9.67 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains Byerly's Grocery Store with a large parking lot in front. (See pages A3 —A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: MXC — Mixed Use Center. Zoning: PCD -3, Planned Commercial District (See page A5.) Site Circulation Access to the site would be from France Avenue and Hazelton Road. A new right -in and right -out would be added at the south lot line on France Avenue. (See page A15.) Hennepin County is agreeable to this new access point. (See County approval letter on page A14k.) 74 There are two existing access points on Hazelton Road. These would be slightly adjusted. A future round -a -bout is planned for the easternmost access point, and has been realigned to match the access to the north. The property owner to the west is now agreeable to this arrangement. (See page A16.) The westernmost access on Hazelton Road would be a right -in and right -out only. As was approved as part of the Preliminary Development Plan, extensive pedestrian paths are planned for the site. Along France Avenue and Hazelton Road, a boulevard style sidewalk would be constructed with green space separating them from traffic. An interior sidewalk is planned from the France Avenue sidewalk, to the east in front of the Byerly's store, to the south side of Building C, and east to connect to the Promenade. (See page A15.) An additional connection to the.Promenade is available from Building A, along the south lot line. Sidewalks are proposed around each of the housing buildings to provide pedestrian connections to the France and Hazelton Road sidewalks and the Promenade. A covered walkway is proposed in the Byerly's parking lot. (See page A15, A16 and A18.) Traffic & Parking Study RLK Incorporated is conducting a parking and traffic study. (See the attached study dated January 16, 2013.) The Study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. The proposed new right -in and right -out on France Avenue would greatly benefit traffic operations around the site. The level of service on adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. The Study further concludes that the project would have adequate parking. Based on the proposal for 68,992 square feet of retail and 234 apartment units, 362 spaces are required for the retail, 19 bike parking stalls, and 234 enclosed units for the apartments. The applicant is proposing 307 spaces for the retail space, 351 enclosed and 23 surface stalls for the apartments. There are 126 enclosed bike racks in the apartment building, and a total of 24 bike racks show at the entrances of each retail building. A shared parking arrangement between all the lots for parking and drive aisle access would be established by a blanket easement over the properties. A parking study was done for the proposed project, which has concluded that the amount of parking provided would adequately serve the proposed development. (See the attached parking study by RLK.) Bike Stalls Based on the square footage of the retail space, 19 spaces for bikes is required. The applicant is proposing 24 spaces to be located in three bike 3 racks with 8 stalls available in each rack. They are conveniently located in front of each of the three retail buildings. (See page A15.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 68 over, story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing 98 over story trees. They would include a mixture of Maple, Lindens, Oak, Crabapple, Birch and Spruce. (See pages A39 —A40.) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. The proposal complies with the City's landscaping regulations. Additionally, per a condition of preliminary approval, the applicant has enhanced the landscaping at the southeast corner of the site by addition Black Hills Spruce and Juniper. Loading Dock/Trash' Enclosures The proposed plans would locate the loading area on the east side of the building along Hazelton Road. (See proposed location on page A15.) This is similar to the arrangement of the loading dock for the recently construction Whole Foods to the south on France Avenue. The loading area would be screened from Hazelton with a brick wall that would match the building. (See page A15, A18 & A39.) Additional landscaping is also proposed along Hazelton to screen the loading area from the Hazelton and adjacent property. This is an improvement over the current location of the loading dock facing the Promenade, and the plans reviewed during the Sketch Plan, which were also facing the Promenade. (See previous Sketch Plan on page A7 & A8.) Loading for the retail space would take place through the main entrances. Trash areas would be located inside of the retail buildings B and C. The Byerly's trash would be located within the loading dock area which would be screened as described above. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be generally acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A99 -A100. A developer's agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks, public water main, sewer and any other public improvements. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City's review authority over the grading of the site. It should be mentioned that the water feature, as recommended in the Promenade Plan, is not specifically designed in the grading plan. (See Promenade Plan on pages A9 —A10.) The Promenade Plan ponding area is located on a high point.on the site, and therefore, is difficult to get drainage to flow naturally to that spot. The applicant is indicating that roof storm water could be routed to the area, with 4 the City of Edina constructing the water feature. (See page All 4b of the applicant narrative.) Lighting The applicant has indicated that all site lighting would conform to City Code requirements. Pole lights, 25 feet tall would be used to light the parking lot areas, and 14 foot tall decorative fixtures would light pedestrian walkways. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices would include lenses, reflectors or shades so as to limit light spill and glare on to adjacent properties. The proposed plans conform to all minimum City Code requirements for lighting. Building /Building Material The proposed building plans and materials are consistent with the Preliminary Plans. The Byerly's store would be constructed of brick on all four sides, with a stone base and concrete panels. (See rendering on pages A16 —A29.) The apartment buildings would be constructed of brick, stucco, metal - panel, and glass. The applicant believes that the mass of the building walls, in particular the west and north elevations, have been broken up by the variety of brick, concrete, windows and landscaping proposed. Signage The underlying zoning of the property would be PCD -3, therefore, would be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. The applicant has submitted a signage plan to approve for the overall development. The locations and size of pylon signs, wall signs and way finding signs are included in the PUD regulations for this site. This site is unique as a unified development, with four separate lots, four buildings, including three separate retail and three separate residential buildings. Site way finding will be important. The proposed signs generally meet the City Code requirements in regard to size; however, due to the mixed use of the property, with multiple lots, additional signs are allowed through the PUD to assist with way finding on the site. Those include the 71 France" signs on both France and Hazelton, and the monument sign facing the Promenade. (See proposed Ordinance on pages A56- A58 and the plans on page A15 and A28.) A sign proposed that would be too large under the PCD -3 Zoning District is the freestanding sign on Hazelton Road, near the entrance to the apartments. As proposed that sign is 100 square feet; zoning ordinance maximum is 50 square feet for a secondary free standing sign off a side street. The applicant believes that 100 square foot sign is critical for the retail portion of the site for way finding, given the three separate commercial buildings. 5 Density The proposed density would be 24 units per acre would be toward the lower middle end of the density range for the City's high density residential development as indicated in the table on the following page. Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69th & York Apartments 3121 69th Street 114 30 Final Plat The applicant is also requesting a Plat to create separate. lots for each of the proposed buildings. (See the plat on page A33.) The site exists as two lots today; the proposed subdivision would create four lots. The subdivision would meet all minimum lot standards and subdivision requirements. Shared parking and drive -aisle agreements would need to be established across the four lots. Preliminary Plat approval has already been granted Park Dedication Per Minnesota State Statute 462.353, Subd. 4(a) and Section 810.13 of the City Code, the applicant is required to dedicate land for public use as parks, playgrounds, recreation facilities, trails, or public open space. Per Section 810.13. Subd. 5 of the City Code, the fees in lieu of land dedication is $5,000 per dwelling unit. The development would create 234 new dwelling units; therefore, a $1,170,000 parking dedication would be required. A portion of the park dedication funds would be used to develop the 2 water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value of the easement would be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication fees would be paid prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 850.04. Subd. 4 D provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; 7 f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. A patio is proposed along France at the front of Byerly's, and the front walkway in front of the building would be covered with a canopy. (See page Al 5.) The store configuration is similar to the recently constructed Whole Foods, except that there is an entry into the store closer to France Avenue. (See page Al & A20.) Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. (See sidewalk plan on page Al 5.) The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. (See pages A14c— A14d.) There was concern raised by the Planning Commission in regard to sustainability of the project, and how it would be monitored in the future. The store and housing projects would participate in the Energy Design Assistance program through Xcel Energy, and a wide array of sustainable measures will be integrated into the project. The development team is committed to an outcome for both the store and housing component that would exceed code - driven energy efficiency standards by a minimum of 5 %. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. (See pages A16 —A29.) The site circulation would be improved on the site with a right -in and right - out added along France Avenue. 8 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. The proposed uses, retail and multiple - family residential housing are uses allowed in the Mixed Use Center, as described in the Comprehensive Plan, and within the underlying PCD -3 Zoning District. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages the mixing of retail and multi- family residential uses. The proposed plans are therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; Again, the proposal is for a mixture of land uses. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As indicated in table earlier within this report, and the fact that the site is located in a commercial area on France Avenue and the Promenade, the proposed density of 24 units per acre is appropriate for this site. Z iv, the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the underlying PCD -3 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone this site to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and number of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. Please note that a few City Standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The site layout would be improved by bringing the building up to the street; pedestrian connections would be incorporated through and around the site, including green space between the road and the sidewalk; locating the taller buildings farther back from France Avenue, into the site; introducing a mixture of uses on the site. The design of the building is of a high quality. Byerly's would be brick on all four sides, with a stone base and concrete panels. (See rendering on pages A16 —A29.) The apartment buildings would be constructed of brick, stucco, metal panels, and large windows. The development would incorporate improved landscaping and green space. Traffic would be improved in the area with a right -in and right -out on France Avenue. 10 Compliance Table * Would require a variance under PCD -3 Zoning 11 City Standard (PCD -3) Proposed Building Setbacks Byerly's Front — France Avenue 50 feet 51 feet Side Street — Hazelton Road 50 feet 24 feet* Side — South NA 200+ feet Rear — East (Promenade) NA 200+ feet Building A Front — France Avenue 81 feet 500+ feet Side Street — Hazelton Road 81 feet 300+ feet Side — South NA 11 & 41 feet Rear — East (Promenade) 81 feet 11 & 22 feet* Building B Front — France Avenue 85 feet 300+ feet Side Street — Hazelton Road 85 feet 200+ feet Side — South NA NA Rear — East (Promenade) 85 feet 200+ feet Building C Front — France Avenue 79 feet 300+ feet Side Street — Hazelton Road 79 feet 43 feet* Side — South NA NA Rear — East 79 feet 46 feet* Parking Lot Setbacks Front — France Avenue 20 feet 51 feet Front — Hazelton Road 20 feet 20 feet Side — South & East NA NA Building Height Byerly's One story — 21 feet Building A Eight stories or 108 feet Six/seven stories — 81 feet Building B Six/seven stories — 85 feet Building C Six stories — 79 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50% 80 %* Lot size = 9.67 acres 338,164 s.f. Parking Stalls Retail 68,992 s.f. = 357 spaces 307 spaces retail* Housing 234 units = 234 enclosed units 351 enclosed & 23 surface Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Would require a variance under PCD -3 Zoning 11 PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 2. The proposed six/seven -story buildings are one -two stories lower than the height allowed by City Code, and would fit into this area. They are consistent with some of the high density residential development to the east and south. 3. The existing roadways would support the project. RLK conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. The proposed new right -in and right -out on France Avenue would greatly benefit traffic operations around the site. The level of service on adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. 4. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for 12 guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. d. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. • Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site. As highlighted above on pages 6 -10, the proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: 1. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. 2. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. A patio is proposed along France at the front of Byerly's, and the front walkway in front of the building would be covered with a canopy. (See page A32.) The store configuration is similar to the recently constructed Whole Foods, except that there is an entry into the store closer to France Avenue. (See page A43 & A52.) 3. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. (See sidewalk plan on pages A43 & A45.) 4. The store and housing projects would participate in the Energy Design Assistance program through Xcel Energy, and a wide array of sustainable measures will be integrated into the project. (See pages A14c— A14d.) The development team is committed to an outcome for both the store and housing component that would exceed code - driven energy efficiency standards by a minimum of 5 %. 13 5. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. (See pages A16 —A29.) 6. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 7. Ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. • Are the Proposed Plans consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plans? Yes. The proposed plans are consistent with the Preliminary Plans. Buildings are all in the same location, pedestrian connections are the same, building materials and landscaping are also the same. Additionally, the applicant has met each of the 18 conditions that were required in the_ Preliminary Development Plan review. (See pages Al4e- A14k.) Staff Recommendation Final Rezoning to PUD & Final Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, and Final Development Plan to build a new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store; a 6/7 -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a 6/7 -story, 77 -unit apartment building with first floor 10,711 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking; and a six -story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. 14 5. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle. 6. The applicant is also proposing sustainability principles within their project narrative, and pledges an energy efficiency standard that would exceed the code driven energy efficiency standard by a minimum of 5 %. 7. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. 8. The site circulation would be improved with a right -in and right -out added along France Avenue. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. Improving the auto - oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. 15 d. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Utility plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped April 26, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped April 26, 2013 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one -year after City Council approval. If the plat is not filed it shall be deemed null and void. 6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. A portion of the park dedication funds shall be used to develop the water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value of the easement shall be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit. 8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 17, 2012. 16 9. All public utility, roadway and sidewalk easements shall be dedicated to the City. 10. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10 %. 11. No delivery truck traffic shall be allowed on 70th Street. 12. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. Subdivision — Final Plat Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat to create a new four lot subdivision at 7171 France for the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 3. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 4. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. A portion of the park dedication funds shall be used to develop the water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value of the easement would be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit. Deadline for a city decision: July 21, 2013 17 ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 7171 FRANCE AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1.. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD)' !Subd. 4. Planned Unit Development District -4 (PUD -4) — 71 France A. Legal Description; Lots 1 -4, Block 1, 71 France Addition, Hennepin County.; B. Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re- development plans received by the City on April 26, 2013, except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2013- , on file in the Office of the Planning Department under file number 2013- 004.13a., C. Principal Uses; All principal and conditional uses allowed in the Planned Commercial District -3 (PCD -3) D. Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the Planned Commercial District -3 (PCD -3) E. Conditional Uses: None Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX IF. Development Standards. Development standards per the PCD -3 Zoning District, except the following:; tuilding Setbacks !Front — France Avenue !Front — Hazelton Road Side — North Side — East (lot line setback) 'Side — East (Promenade setback) !Rear — South Building Height Maximum Floor Area Ratio Parking Stalls (Residential) ,Parking Stalls (Retail) Signage Type Building ID Residential Building /store ID Retail Freestanding (Retail) Neighborhood ID Sign Directional monument 50 feet 24 feet 22 feet 46 feet 11 feet (Story 1) 22 feet (Story 2 -8) 11 feet (Story 1) 40 feet (Story 2 -8) eight stories or 108 feet 80% 350 enclosed & 33 surface 314 stalls Max. Number One per building One per bldg. front One per entrance One per street front Promenade Max. Area 12 s.f. 15% of wall area 100 s.f. (France Ave) 50 s.f. (Hazelton Rd.) 60 s.f. 25 s.f. 6 s.f. Max. Hqt. 6 ft. N/A 20 ft. 20 ft. 2 ft. 7 ft. - 4 ft. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —'XXXX' ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX F'Ur City of Edina ME- 2..Ml md PID: 3202824220009 7171 France Ave S tia Edina, MN 55435 A f Legend Htjh6phlad Foatura .f Cdy Lords L.k.s Parks ❑ Pant b �a City of Edina 1/11 + • - � Iii .. �� .. •� miry �♦r���� �����♦�I„ MEN -1 ��, - a ■ ��! �� �� it � ■e Ak T. �a -4 i& " p _ City of Edina '..312 1 fio 0 I If��l f 'r 75 ';6 ► -�r—�. 6ie9 t .� {� JI JI i.1i•(i 31C0 33,3 wl�l -,.fjJ i' -7� jI�1 - q'• ti'c •�11 4 � '7C01 iCCO 70157314' P li 7CCI 1- (3.91 1 01 .�II� F• �1• r ID217025'. 70 0 Si � 1.J -' / 1. n j70J73C05: • f 7� I I '� 1C x,]71, 14 • 7110 a f, J F `�� k, C �,JR, - 71'01 V "•.• �.,4 �J — S 6 ° t✓y E3 .zr•• , 310sR <Y 4 02030W2- J-.� i Ih• 124` I of lr ' yL r��1yy71 fl 711 `_ 1 �: 7161- .YA'�'� A 71 ]2y 3 , fi ,� x � .\ aS� )•T3 r j.1 7�12 r�["1 F aLi�i: ' �•- 101dy'1117'16 719 �a1 7 �, � Pill, 10142a E aK,717,;}Ms'!: st}'i•`/i pis Fi '310 zaXllc9 i?i71 i) 9 K n •da 1ta+ r I•,.2 li :r a.. .�k'0112 tIGIEa2x4 , Iw; wd�t 1M 7232, Jl Blx �in1E `� -23• / I "n A� r^-1: ' s Ufa cl/ 91.412 ]1, # }) cs v�, iczT% �:7C87 515 t •� i p t !'V 901.0 3 1 i ,6• - Y 1 1J - r•.i RE3J � 24 'k °t• ]0193113 7 a )373 -AV 213205201:33 215 - 3)0317 te- •irS 1700137400 74057900 E+241CT]11 7a J� 4r1 i� �74N }74097.38 l57L•I' Q's!•V` ,3524 - �Vt 740970E 7- 15741. �1 - - •ry `.. 301 _'. 1 Yom. a 2413,7412 741117., A N - 1 V � ` a•; ,, ' '277a2i 425 7430 7 - 1 r4z_ 7a 34 7439 wae�� 1 -. f • ; 74377430 74457444'4 ^t� , s 7 -31 24. 7501,7'00 r'. v. 7W9 750E v. � �'z' _ ' 'rl py �'• 7 'a 75157514 7 75x yk 1520 7550 ` 1 t 1512 75271752E a [ \ 7533 7572 0 4i v el y PID:3202824220009 7171 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 43 Legend Sueoundtlg House Number Labels House Ni Labels Sliest Rama Labab .! Cily LWs / Craeks Laks Names Lakes Ps1ks OPal is 2009 Asriel Pholo City of Edina OgLn Surrouurfig House Numbei Labeb _r 1 �. .. _ > €� 1 r i Ff.RM11, � I . • " J i"`.d \ I � 1"� 1 Ill flfH C7101� r� 3650. �Sii'T7. Houma Numb. r Labak 51raet Nama Labek `/ Coy Units [ -�• • f� �.: I' . � I^ 1tr7I �- r r@tf ( Gaks Lake NOmes t_I — ❑ Parks _ - - •t �� •Mr��,�! t1 t. ...'F 71P� to +.. 1 � Parrab 2009 Aellel Photo � 4 fill -F' 0 f't `F '� if � �` 7 j E - J - FA1 } --�- , N :1 � �� ' f l E 1 1 I I j R { i 1 t• ':t -. . E, I (. ,�R 1.� ifiG I � !•F fl�Fj B ji I � S' 'it - li. lilt _ 1V .235 `. 71 r 1� ht k+, ••� �R' it '.l F6 Rf17JI °ALLAGXER DR F >4i� 3TLf� 1 •` t Y�Skt'°u Y' IG18� . .1117 I E16 ;� 713 •�/ X1115 b14 i` 1 .' _lu /r J r 1014 1012 t l l'i 612 q` e� 71151 '124 I I I I 'bi0 77117 4 1 PID: 3202824220009 7171 France Ave S Sri Edina, MN 55435 � , r1CYif41i-� 2.R4� • lu1�1} A OM 'Muz- milli WIN Pon tia of Edina PID:3202824220009 7171 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 As-- 'A Legend St.st N% m L.b.Is Cly Linfi-. C.0 Lake W—. Lakes Parks Zoning 0 Ej ■ 0 ■ 0 0 F-1 Poo (h'.j bi—a a�q ■ Pup j pi--'A'j:a t-L t AD3.1 PW-2j---dOr-0---k4 ■ PaD.1 PAD-2 (P-,i R..i-" Ufwiti P.493 ip..".1 A-drffd owo.j PRO 4 Wf.,w .Ik6*d D4%j.Ij go ppo s 4p� --d ztid " ok—, M Parals A Aerial view from SE View from SE - Macy's Prop line Byerly's Edina Mn T ANDERSON Comprehensive Building & Development Services ICA i I LU I Z "' Q O w U Z I� I I�1 I> I $ I I HAZELTON ROAD ... + �K � o k,,�) UI `1_1 I I I I I I 40 PARKING SPACES @ 9' -0" I 4 SUPPO`' 147 PARKING SPACES @ 9' -0" � r FUTURE RETAIL Uo0 RAII GAROEr' I•STORY aDbvx) N: 19,000 SF JI IV I I I I I I I I I I I I��� XODSING - ill-- ,I- yl- {lyll- III I }I - III- -{II -- III -- III -III spoor/ [OMMOr REIOCATEO PYLON SIGN FUTURE HOUSING 7-STORY 67 UNITS 229 PARKING SPACES @ 9' -6" :•.1 HOUSING a_ 7 -STORY 9-00+8 96 UNITS V H HHH -H -HH B� RIL S \ 46.000 SF ♦ 5.800 SF MEZZ ppCg S1.R00 SF f Rn Mu .6 DATA SUMMARY HousingA 125,100 sf 96 units Housing B (future) 84,800 sf 67 units . Byerly's 51,600 sf Retail (future) 19,000 sf PARKING SUMMARY parking req parking provided Housing (1.5 /unit) garage surface Housing 96 units 144 96 Housing B (future) 67 units 101 50 245 146 119 Retail Byerly's 51,800 Sf 277 Retail (future) 19,000 sf 95 372 354 total required I total provided 619 DOCK rK f �� 'COVERED, K \I /� Byerlyrs Edina Mn / 4 o iDRIVE I I I I I I T17-11-1 -I-rrT - I I POND E%ISTINGMACY -SWE \ \ I I H +I -I i -I -I H+ H +[.� =1;- �1 SITE PLAN �J t 30-0 �- NOflTN ANDERSON L� KM BUILD "S Compreh —We Bulldln4 S Develop, 02/22/12 P A lomp Galleria C lu ' rsbop'ping Center ��{�,/ 'tl 41 IN Y IR. -t �.+,: '4s..: :•'.i� If I..,1 , ,. t/1 t t 1 t! r 1 Ifry lin HllA i • IM 1 n rlt �t m rRn Ihl» I• 11 1 I I 1 �- nlar '. :.�;'T`�!'�"`•'la�v�Qi ? 1pt'r� ��.�I 70th St. ' Irtll 7101,. i 1i {i \r Np - _- -1 I • inpirr try. v♦.... t .. i f '� �'f •� - ♦ tit \�,lt - \ \t � � .i�Y � FS _ _ _.� ArliN %• t� I � ( I fP�irry rirr ♦ i ... � FL Brandon, c� t`\ w r ' S �.cr. :1I a rArgv:ir. . �1 E q ■ .�. ` rk �',�F mar_ '— *"• ,� ` , � ��r,� �i�.t � i I i' P IN � _i� .i. ., £ ' ,' 'r' f ♦ � � a a �l I r r I IM II 11 1 � SI • Star` IT L - rktown• Retail Centef��� Byerlysr i�l I `♦ i '.11114 Fftrltfli sl4tlp 1 v 51 r, r 1�r .• li I'!1 /,rte cY,£ � ,•+ 1 nts .y r: Iils� St� Under, , 01 0 100 300 Feet EDINA PROMENADE { wl -.1 '' ' ` r r Urban Design Plan IM, trY0 i L ra P' •e � ., tj � I�Qe� July 2007 I R'' • f 1 !y • �,t UM ♦ � I 1 iing, Figure 33 Promenade Component Plan Promenade Design Legend X I. Gateway 2. Crossroads Feature 3 Landscaping Feature *ft 4. Single Sculpture ' M 5' Sculpture Group ' r! s' Sculpture Fountain � ^w I ; ! 7. Pond / Stream and Fountain 8. �' �, York Ave. • Underpass 01 0 100 300 Feet EDINA PROMENADE { wl -.1 '' ' ` r r Urban Design Plan IM, trY0 i L ra P' •e � ., tj � I�Qe� July 2007 I R'' • f 1 !y • �,t UM ♦ � I 1 iing, Figure 41 Stormwater Pond I Stream Concept Promenade Design PRImEPANI ?L#P 1 0 50 100 150 Feet EDINA PROMENADE Urban Design Plan July 2007 w z W Q W U z LL iij I AZEL bAD RYLOHSIGH- — tl Schafer Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS Comprehensive Buddmq S Development Services REVISED SITE PLAN _/ WATER GFANRE EY OTHERS , % Preliminary Development Plan Byerly'S France Avenue Re- Development EDINA, MN 3 -7 -2013 1 15226-11051 P1�Fu M 14 Ait I PLAN QJ I i I Preliminary Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN 01/26/13 15226 -11051 f �I - - - - w4L AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST Schafer ANDERSON Richardson KM BUILDERS Comprehensive BWIdinq 6 OevB., —t Services 7 metalroofedge sliding entry doors J11V 111 LLCVNIIVIV e' B' 16' Pau^ ftAY WEST ELEKATION ` iL0 POUF MR fl T,75 vfs �w`Mx ssla -Sl]5 (iS11N1fiW fAY I6v�F3�LL01 BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT Elm Schafer Y Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN b28-13 j Relminary 01/28/13 OeMapmeM %an BYERLY'S STORE ELEVATIONS 15116 11oS1 1, mcm A .3. l J °' °' Is' NORTH ELEVATION PROM. PLAW POPE ARCHMM �6i>t NZ.zOp�fut165t�ur•1101 arAlwn BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT 0�1 Schafer T Richardson ANDERSON KM BUILDERS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN t -28 -13 wewmn WaW3 D-b,W Fl. BYERLY'S STORE ELEVATIONS �m „ Isxxsv°sl MY Y MCM A 3.2 Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment April 24,2013 Final Development Application Narrative Lund Food Holdings, in partnership with Schafer Richardson, seeks to redevelop an existing 9.67 acre parcel at the southeast quadrant of France Avenue and Hazelton Road in Edina. The property is presently occupied by a Byerly's store of just over 59,000 sq. ft. The proposed redevelopment will create an exciting mixed - use community, including a residential village along the Promenade, a new retail destination on France Avenue, and improved connections to and through the site for those driving, as well as for pedestrians, cyclists, and those using mass transit. Overview: Current zoning is PCD -3. PUD zoning classification for this project is desired in order to provide flexibility that will enhance redevelopment outcomes and provide benefits as described in the city zoning code 850.04 subpart 4. The proposed redevelopment plan includes, in Phase 1, a replacement Byerly's store, 47,119 sq. ft. in footprint, and two market -rate rental apartment buildings. Building A is a 6 story, 104 -unit Apartment Building, with two levels of underground parking. Building B is a six story, 77 -unit Apartment Building including 10,711 sq. ft. of retail space on the west side of the ground level, and two levels of underground parking. A second phase of redevelopment includes an additional apartment building (Building C) containing 48 dwelling units and 11,162 sq. ft. of retail area on the west side of the ground level, and two levels of underground parking. Building A contains 130,181 sq. ft. Building B contains 98,536 sq. ft. and Building C contains 78,029 sq. ft. (Note that underground parking area and enclosed ramps are not included in the totals above.) On- site parking provided includes 183 spaces serving the Byerly's retail, 44 spaces serving Building B Retail, 80 spaces serving Building C Retail, 278 below -grade spaces serving Building A and B residential, 73 kelow- grade spaces serving Building C residential, and 23 on- grade residential visitor parking spaces.�,�` QQ` The requested building addresses are as follows: Byerly's Store 7171 France Avenue `� �► lI S \_ Housing Building A 7141 France Avenue Q� PQ� < VQ Housing Building B 7131 France Avenue Q� Housing Building C 7121 France Avenue Byerly's Store Description: The Byerly's store is a single level, slab -on grade structure, with a mezzanine of 4,500 sq. ft. Building height ranges from 20'6" to 30'. It's exterior architectural expression is rooted in the Prairie Style School and includes the use of natural indigenous stone, brick, architectural precast, glass, stucco and metal panel. The structural system relies on load- bearing, insulated, architectural pre -cast wall panels, finished with a combination of thin -set brick, precast masonry, and exposed, scored, colored- concrete. The store layout and the need for "back of house" spaces limit the ability of the design team to introduce vision glass in the exterior wall. Vision glass has been added where possible, and further articulation of the exterior has been accomplished through changes in wall plane and materials. #cl Page 2 A covered walkway, constructed of materials similar to the store, extends through the primary store parking field on a north /south axis to provide shelter for pedestrians. Housing Description: Buildings A, B, and C are all 6 stories in height above grade with an average parapet elevation not in excess of 85'. All three buildings rely on below -grade parking, with building A and B having interior vehicular connection below grade, and an enclosed, heated, pedestrian connection above. The buildings are concrete construction from the parking levels through the first floor, and wood construction (Type 3A) from floors two through six. The exterior architectural expression of Buildings A, B, and C is clean, sleek and modern. Enclosure materials include brick, stucco, metal - panel, and glass. Continuity between the Byerly's store and the housing buildings is achieved through the use of similar materials and colors. It is the desire of both Lund Food Holdings, and Schafer Richardson that the design of the buildings reflect their differing purposes. Transit and Site Access: The redevelopment of the site has been planned with pedestrian, bicycle, and transit use in mind. The layout of the residential buildings takes advantage of their immediate proximity to the Promenade, and pedestrian way- finding through the site is established by the use of a broad, landscaped, walkway, special paving sections at roadway intersections, and other architectural features. The Byerly's store entry canopy extends east to welcome pedestrians coming from the housing and Promenade, and the design of the store includes outdoor gathering spaces along France Avenue on grade, and on a second level. The planned France Avenue pedestrian and bicycle pathway will be immediately adjacent this outdoor seating space. An existing transit stop on France Avenue will be relocated to the north side of the new Byerly's, on Hazelton Road, for improved access and safety. Access to the site from north -bound France Avenue is provided via a right -In /right -out connection established between the subject site, and the Macy's Home Store property to the south. An agreement for this shared access is in place between the two property owners. Access to the site from south -bound France Avenue, and from the east, is via two curb cuts on Hazelton Road. The easternmost access is envisioned to be signalized, while the westernmost access will be right -In /right -out only. The easternmost access drive is indicated as spanning the property line between the subject parcel and the neighboring property to the East. An agreement between the two property owners is in place. Stormwater, Landscaping and Site Lighting: Storm water management design includes conventional as well as innovative technologies. Rain Gardens, Tree Pits, and a Stockholm soils system will capture surface drainage and promote transpiration and infiltration. The Stockholm soils system utilizes a rock area (tree pit) below grade to promote plant health as well as to provide storm water volume storage. Additional rate control, and below -grade infiltration will be provided through construction of a storm water vault below the Byerly's parking area. Roof water f housing buildings A, B, & C will be routed to a water feature along the Promenade that we underste "rIII be designed and constructed by the City. The proposed landscape design has a variety of native tree, shrub, and plant types that provo�eas u interest and will exceed the requirements of the City codes. The landscaped areas will ha Nal effi {� 4A e\ Page 3 irrigation system with moisture sensors to reduce the amount of water needed, and to prevent over - watering. Site Lighting will be provided in accordance with City requirements. Pole lights of 25' in height will be used to light the parking lot areas, and 14' tall decorative fixtures will light pedestrian walkways. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices will include lenses, reflectors or shades so as to limit light spill and glare onto adjacent properties. Illumination measured at the property line abutting residential zoned lots will not be greater than three foot - candles or ten foot - candles measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned non- residential. A photometric plan is included in the submission. Please note that the design may evolve as final fixture selection occurs, within the confines of the zoning ordinance. Sustainability: This mixed use project will incorporate sustainable design principles, materials, system selections, and operating protocols. Redevelopment of an existing site in a densely developed suburban context affords many opportunities. The Store and Housing projects will participate in the Energy Design Assistance program through Xcel Energy, and a wide array of sustainable measures will be integrated in to the project. The housing design team began the EDA process on April 8, and the Store design team will follow shortly. The entire project team is committed to an outcome for both the store and housing, that exceeds code - driven energy efficiency standards by a minimum of 5 %. Specific sustainable features that will be incorporated into the residential buildings include: • Energy efficient windows, roof, and wall assemblies • Occupancy sensor controls in select building locations • High efficiency heating and cooling • High efficiency, Energy Star appliances in units • LED and fluorescent lighting fixtures throughout • Individually controlled and metered heating and cooling • Low flow plumbing fixtures and irrigation sensors to reduce water usage • Use of recycled content materials • Use of regional materials • Use of Low- Emitting Materials (VOC) including adhesives and sealants, paintings and coatings, and carpeting • At least six electric vehicle charging stations in parking areas • Stormwater system designed to optimize infiltration and support Promenade water feature • Convenient bicycle storage with a minimum of 150 bicycle parking stalls in dedicated storage areas Specific sustainable features that will be incorporated into the Byerly's store include: • An energy- efficient, high - performance, building enclosure system Al • Day - lighting • Occupancy sensors Q�Q • High efficiency mechanical and electrical systems with high - performance controls �V� �%N Q • The use of locally and regionally sourced materials, components and - equipment • Incorporation of materials high in post- consumer and post industrial recycled c �nt Query • The inclusion of 6car- charging stations in a preferred location in the store par l�i lot. P ��� A+(' Page 4 • Night shades will be installed on open refrigerated display cases within the store, resulting in an energy savings of approximately 50 %. • Store lighting, both interior and exterior, will be 20% more efficient than standard systems • The total refrigerant charge for the grocery store will be 30% less than a standard system • Specification of Low Emitting materials • Convenient bicycle parking • Convenient access to Mass Transit Signage: Signage design is included in the submission. The design includes signage applied to retaining walls at the main entry points that identifies the residential neighborhood, coupled with pylon signs in the same locations identifying retail uses. In addition, building- mounted signage will be used to identify other retail partners and tenants. Please note that the signage design is intended to convey the scale and location of various signage components, and that final design (font, colors, etc.) will follow. Conclusion: This is an exciting redevelopment opportunity that has been in the planning stages for more than a year. The Sketch Plan Review process completed early in 2012 was of great help to the development team, and this plan changed significantly as a result. The Preliminary Development Process, likewise, improved the project significantly. The pedestrian connection from the Promenade, in particular, was greatly enhanced during this process. The outcome is a Final Development Submission that adds 234 housing units along the Promenade, activates France Avenue frontage with a new retail presence, connects the Promenade to the France Avenue Frontage for Pedestrians, and enhances access to and through the site for all who will use it. . Additional background information regarding Lund Food Holdings and Schafer - Richardson Commercial Real Estate is available on their respective websites; www.lfhi.com and www.sr - re.com . We appreciate your consideration of the Final Development Plan application; and look forward to meeting with you to discuss the project in greater detail. Q� *A Cresa Minneapolis 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.337.8498 tel 612.337.8459 fax Memorandum Date May 6, 2013 To Cary Teague, City Planner Company City of Edina From Jim Vos Re 71 France / Byerly's redevelopment Response to Preliminary Site Plan Approval Conditions cc Cary — The Tenant's Advantage cresa.com Attached is our response to each of the 17 conditions stipulated in your memo to us following the City Council's conditional approval of the preliminary site plan for the redevelopment of the Byerly's property on the corner of France Ave and Hazelton. We've attempted for each item to reference the specific page of the plans where the requested item is shown, or to explain our response to the requirement established. You will see that we believe we have respected each of the 17 conditions (and one which your memo did not include but the council specifically requested.) As you review the final plans submitted, you will note that the revisions since our previous submission are minor clarifications in most regards. With the exception of the expanded store mezzanine and the addition of the requested architectural detail on the north face, the store remains relatively unchanged. The Housing design is also generally unchanged, though we have upgraded the exterior materials in some areas. There was some concern previously about our arrangements with the neighboring property owners. At this time, we have presented temporary construction licenses and /or reciprocal access easement agreements to both Macy's and the Wolfson's. We have had cordial discussions with both parties and expect to have these documents finalized by the end of May. On behalf of the entire development team, I'd be happy to answer any additional questions you may have, or to gather additional information that is necessary for this Final Site Plan Approval and PUD application. Please feel free to contact me at any time. savills Partners In Global Real Estate 4t 71 France — Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated January 28, 2012, the revisions submitted to the Planning Commission March 13, 2013. Final Development plans should include specific locations of trash enclosure areas, number of bike parking spaces provided, and where loading/ deliveries are made to the retail space and apartments. We believe the final Development Plans are generally consistent with the Preliminary Plans. Specific locations of trash enclosure areas and bike parking locations /counts are illustrated on the Site Plan, Sheet A1.1. Loading and deliveries for the retail tenants are intended to be through their primary entrances. Residents will be permitted to move in through the main building entrances — packages and mail deliveries will be located in the first floor mail centers for each building. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Final Landscape Plan is indicated on sheets C13 and C14 of the civil plan set. Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance would require 68 trees on the site, plus additional shrubs or perennial plantings. The submitted plan, consistent with our intent to add green spaces, includes 95 over -story trees and 38 ornamental trees, plus 880 shrubs and over 2700 perennials. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 850.04, Subd.3 H.S.f indicates that the planner may require the lighting plan which is included in the plan set as sheet C.12. That section of the zoning ordinance is not specific about how Lighting Plan is to meet landscaping requirements. 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. The complete Sign Plan is included in the submitted plan set with the architectural drawings and perspectives. 5. Architectural features, windows or articulation must be added to the north elevation of the new Byerly's building. Having studied the interior layout of the store, the determination was made that additional architectural detail would be the most prudent revision to the north elevation of the new Byerly's building. The detail which was originally along the very west edge has now been replicated along the full width of the North wall (shown on Sheet A3.2). Additional pilaster details have also been added to the loading area wall, and additional plantings - both foundation plantings and trees /shrubs — have been added along the north wall (visible in the Landscaping Plan, Sheet C.13) Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated February 22, 2013. The various conditions referenced in the city engineer's Feb. 22 memo have been addressed either on the drawings where requested, or will be addressed in the development agreement. Page 1-of 6 hl i,r- 71 France — Bverly's France Avenue Redevelopment 7. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. We understand this requirement and understand the final motion to approve the application would normally include the creation of the requisite PUD district. 8. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. We understand the timing requirements of the final plat process and will comply. 9. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. All of the access easements between the various parcels, as well as parking easements, and utility easements will be recorded with the final plat. 10. The Park Dedication fee of $1,230,00 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. As a part of the Development Agreement to be executed, Staff and the applicant have negotiated potential offsets to the Park Dedication fee in exchange for necessary easements (other than access points), environmental remediation, construction of the City water feature, and /or other public /private improvements. Staff has also acknowledged that the phasing of the construction will roll out over a period of years, and that any fee due after said offsets would be paid prior the issuance of Occupancy Certificates on a building -by- building basis (based on unit count). The city will receive cash or equivalent value for the Park Dedication Fee due. 11. Enhanced and taller landscaping in the southeast corner of the site by the pool. As illustrated on the final Landscape Plan (Sheet C.13) additional planting of various types have been provided on the Southeast corner of the building, including 6 Black Hills Spruce trees and a number of junipers which provide height and texture variations. 12. All public utility, roadway and sidewalk easements shall be dedicated to the City. The plat and easement agreements will comply with this requirement. 13. Detail must be provided for the proposed covered walkways. The design of the covered walkway in the parking lot is based on a single column design with two flat roof segments as illustrated on the site plan Sheet A1.1 and visible in the Perspective Sheet 3, showing the aerial view from the Southeast. The covered walkway in front of the grocery store is a two- column design with similar materials - also shown on the site plan Sheet A1.1, but also illustrated in Sheet A3.1. Page 2 of 6 A49 71 France — Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment 14. Attempt an energy saving goal of 10 %above Code. The housing portion of the development has enrolled in the Xcel Energy Design Assistance program and a kick off meeting was held on April 8, 2013. Currently the Weidt group is performing energy modeling and preliminary cost analysis for the development. A strategy results meeting will be held on May 20'h and final project selections will be made mid to end of June after the bundle analysis has been completed. Energy saving strategies being considered include: increased percentages a LED lighting in the project, daylighting controls, occupancy sensors, upgraded and alternate unit heating /cooling packages, energy star bath fans, fan system power reductions, and increased water heating efficiency. In addition to our efforts towards a 10% energy savings above code we have also added improved stormwater features to the housing site - a Swedish stormwater system is proposed which would manage virtually all housing- related stormwater while improving tree health. The grocery store portion of the Site is now also enrolled in the Xcel Energy EDA program, and we will pursue that to completion over the next 60 -90 days. Significant developments in refrigeration efficiency will be evident in the store design, such as individual case controllers and variable capacity compressors which reduce the coolant charge and energy usage, and night shades to contain cooling during non -store hours. The store will also utilize reclaimed heat from the refrigeration system to pre -heat water before it goes into the gas fired water heaters. The refrigeration systems should be approximately 40% more efficient than traditional methods. We've elsewhere mentioned the LED lighting system that will be used throughout the store, which, in combination with daylighting, variable lighting controls, and motion- controlled lighting where appropriate, should result in energy savings of approx. 20% over traditional systems. While not directly tied to energy consumption that gets measured on site, the new cardboard compactor system allows for three times the capacity of the current system, reducing trips for haulers to the recycling center. 15. Enhanced landscaping within the Byerly's parking field. We studied the area between islands and the walkway and find it to be quite efficient and relatively small. Target's lot was offered as an example — they have approx. 750 stalls. Our total store parking field is approx. 25% of that, with 114 on the east side of the covered walk. That leaves 143 stalls in the open field, including the 4 tree islands — Whole Foods has 136 stalls in their front and no green space or tree islands /screening. Scaled overlay images of how the new Byerly's parking area compares to both Target (landscaped with tree islands) and Whole Foods (no landscaping of any kind) are attached as Exhibit A. 16. All crosswalks shall be marked with duraprint stamping to clearly identify the pedestrian crossing. The Duraprint concrete stamping, and all cross walks, are shown where requested on the Site Plan, Sheet A1.1. 17. No delivery truck traffic shall be allowed on 70th Street. Byerly's will instruct their corporate drivers not to use 70`h street from Hwy 100 to France for any delivery activity. In addition, Byerly's will request their vendor and direct delivery partners to also avoid using 70th. While we support and will cooperate with this request, as we understand Target has also done, we respectfully suggest the city post "No Truck Traffic" signs along the specified route for the benefit of the residents in the area. Page 3 of 6 4k 71 France — Bverly's France Avenue Redevelopment 18. County approval of the right -in and right -out on France Avenue. In the letter from Hennepin County Public Works dated April 9, 2013, Director James N. Grube states, "The county is in support of the proposed right -in /right -out access" (see copy attached.) In addition to the conditions listed in the 3120113 email from the City Planner, the applicant noted one additional condition articulated by the council during their review /approval of the preliminary site plan. The council requested, specifically, that a sidewalk be added running north from the retail portion of "Building C" to the current Hazelton Avenue sidewalk. This pedestrian link has been added and can be seen on the site plan, Sheet A1.1. Page 4 of 6 71 France — Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment Exhibit A — Parking Comparison Images Scale comparison of Proposed Byerly's Parking to Target Parking Lot Scale comparison of Proposed Byerly's Parking to Whole Foods Lot Page 5 of 6 Al+j 71 France — Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment County Letter Supporting Right -in /Right -out design (Emphasis added) Hennepin County Public Works Transportation Department Phone: 612. 596 -0300 Public Works Facility 1600 Prairie Drive Web:www.co.hennepin.mn.us Medina, MN 55340 -5421 April 9, 2013 Mr. Cary Teague, Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Preliminary Plat Review — 13yerly's Right- In/Right -Out Proposed Access Southeast Quadrant of CSAI.1 17 (France Avenue) and I lazelton Road Hennepin County Plat Review No. 3265 Dear Mr. Teague: Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow tip to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. over the last few months we've discussed various site plans for the proposers redevelopment of Byerly's with city staff and the developer. A key element of our discussion has been the possible addition ora right- in/right -out access onto France Avenue, The most recent site plans were sent by the city on March 23, 2013. The city also provided updated concepts for improvements to the France Avenue medians on March 291h. A traffic impact study was completed for this proposed redevelnpntcnt by RLK Inc., dated February 22, 2013. Stall- from the City of Edina, along with file developer and their consultants, presented information to the county Plat Review Contnitice on March 5111. The county is in support of the proposed right -in /right -out access with the inclusion of the following comments. Access Design — From the initial discussions, the have supported a site plan and traffic circulation system that incorporated the adjacent Macy's Horne Store. We feel [hat patrons to the various commercial establishments will need alternative routes to access France Avenue, thus avoiding a concentrated burden on any one access point. The current site plan shows this internal connection. Based on the current site plan / access design, channelization modifications are being proposed for the France Avenuen2nd Street intersection to accommodate the right -in /right -out for Byerly's and increase the weaving distance on France Avenue. In addition, we have discussed (lie maintenance and snow plowing for the proposed right -in /right -out island. It is our understanding that the county's maintenance %tafl' will not be responsible for any portion of the maintenance of this proposed entrancelexit. Rigid- of- lt'egj — Based on our discussions with the City, the design of the retaining walls will not encroach within the county right- of-way along France Avenue. No additional right -of -way is being requested by the county as part of this proposed redevelopment. Permits — Please inform tine developer that the construction of the right -in /right -out access will require an approved Hennepin County pennit prior to beginning construction. Any additional proposed construction within county right -of -way will also require a permit, including, but not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. permit questions can he directed to Steve Grocn at (612) 596 -0337 ors net r.Kroen(a)cvahennepbt.rnn.rrs. Please contact Bob Byers (612) 596 -0354 or rnhertht 'er3f6'crahenaenirr.rnur.r1 s fur further discussion ofthesc items ( /Sincerely,r ^� 1m es N. Grubc, P.F. Director of Transporation and County Engineer 1NG /cjs cc: Wayne Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Plat Review Committee Mark Larson, Hennepin County Survey Office /in f -giud Oppurt+a14),1- mldoyel Page 6 of 6 1.11 z Li Q I.LI 1 U Z LL. ff HAZELTON_ _ ROAD..... .. PYLON S" IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 11 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 t� IIIII 1111111111111111111111111��1 _I_I�I���I \ IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l i l l l l l I.I ■ B, Schafer ®� Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES Comprehensive Building L Development Services ENTRY SIGN BENCH SEATING BIKE CONNECTION PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROMENADE / SEATING BENCH Final Development Plan Byerly's France Avenue Re- Development EDINA, MN 4.25-2013 115226-11051 SITE PLAN NdI1H �1 a i ✓C ! � 1a Final Development Plan • ' Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN 04/2511315226-11051 ■ ■Schafer MIR, Richardson r AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST ANDERSON COMPANIES VIEW FROM PARKING, LOOKING NORTHEAST Final Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN D4/25113 15226-12051 ■ ■Schafer UN Richardson STREET LEVEL VIEW FROM FRANCE AVE ■ANDERSON ' COMPANIES comprenonsv. eulwny � owriwmml Sxrkrr r '4 f - w \ AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTHEAST 11 Final Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN 04/25/13 15226.11051 ■ ■Schafer • � Richardson AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST ANDERSON COMPANIES c.mnr.nm.ro• euiama c oneomn.n� s..rm.. VIEW FROM PROMENADE, LOOKING NORTHWEST VIEW FROM PARKING, LOOKING EAST Final Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN 04/25/13 15226 -11051 ■ ■Schafer • N Richardson STREET LEVEL VIEW FROM HAZELTON ROAD ANDERSON COMPANIES crmr<rn.mi.. ewaop c omirrm.� x<,. � al roof edge V Insulated glass in g Precast concrete panel, Manufactured 4 "x12 "Thin brick 4 "x12 "Thin brick 1" Insulated 1" Insulated clear Natural stone Precast I. aluminum frame storefront system buff color stone base on cast 1 n le hi Ni ht course pre pan si g g g translucent glaring in ision glass in aluminum frame system/ �luminum frame system (a' eneer at columns and pilasters course /scored, Metal clad columns Standing seam Rooftop egipment / /string /at comers /metal roofing /Metal coping �(to be determined) / JSignage(by owner) \Pedestrian canopy with \ / 4 Ply built -up roof and Power operated metal roofedge sliding entry doors il6S7fIF.4d:i SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION NVE MCHITECiS I, som ma ST. v W 4 Mx s5 t0a--, BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■' $Chaff[ * Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -25 -13 Fb W35/33 3YERLY'S STORE ELEVATIONS 1531 &llfbl MCM A3.1 r2J Standing seam metal /11 at loading dock d -k-11: LAST LLLVAIIUN NORTH ELEVATION POPE ARCHITECTS rtwu v M x ss lox. n.s1w mo "'M MN BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■ Schafer ■ Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES � r FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -25 -13 s W- Fvm' 00/15/13 e,ekmnent Pte, - -- -- BYERLY'S STORE ELEVATIONS 1521611051 MCM X-3. 2 II ii �I� 11 �� ■ii, �-.� �'■i�' i■ � iii ! _�. ��_, iG, r, � .■ tni UiI�A19: 1�1�aJ:r�iitl�i.'i�'..��4'��als i,•..,�,���wEn�U e � ■� logo 111111111 NMI INS In t Mimi own 3 BYERLY'S wim III NO IN wilm ea=. Tli1 re RA-1 Lmliwt a it 11131111 E— lo ■ Nis In ■ 1allml — lllm ol f I WINE! in It 1■ Alit Impli Is Inn et :■lk 1� SYERLY'S ■ No i Ism 11m■1r ■1��1■.1ms1111�11 IIG I 11 lmilil�l ®11 Ilil .�� lily! IN .iillil Iii 1�1pig111 ■1 ■�1��111�11 HUM, � i 'eiel5lf 7t1® ME 1.1 , Jmmm, 100111 " Imp III IMea1M1■M11 O M111111■!E1111111■ER11 ■11 P11g E ARCHITECTS 3 BYERLY'S P11g E ARCHITECTS 3 BYERLY'S IS Kill Kill III 91111 oil migo ■ENEM No INS 111®11011 mmal FI-1 — El oil oil WNMI, ild led M-9-mi. BYERLY'S ■ cresa �.0 <7' Ver o' 6• I6• Scale: l ^ =s' -o^ SOUTH ELEVATION Average FFE above grade. 1' -0. 0' a,16• Scale: I " =g' -0^ WEST ELEVATION POPE ARCXITECTS sr —4 rnAru,4 R. suits xm . rR svaans 8YERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT 06 Schafer MIN Richardson ■ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 44543 era.w tirl oM1N1� OerakgnrR Plw Sigpimerbl OS /O) /13 Inlgmalm —_ BUILDING C ELEVATIONS 15-16 -11051 A3.7 — Scale: l " =8' -0" �1 J Average FFE above grade: 1 - 0" NORTH ELEVATION 1■ ■ ■ ■� a' 16' Scale: 3" = 8'- 0" Aetal panel, silver metallic itu¢o, color C 1VAC grill, paint to match adjacent cdorl IrickA nck B EAST ELEVATION 7 PE AIICMITECrS 1.95 .,M PE N. SURE 100 aU4 as s3i0s113S 16511 N39i00 I Fax 16$O NS -1101 wwx.pppeart� tan BYERLYS FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT Schafer • Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -25 -13 F1alr rlvLL M /35/13 Cwwaa/Plaw Sq/raW _ DS/D7113 ky11a1 BUILDING C ELEVATIONS 15336 -31051 aN A3.8 - ■1 ��� �'� ■1 �� ■ Iltllo ■I ® • �� • ONE ■li !�� �11 ■� 1■ 1■ GOB ■tl silo 1 Elio ■�� loll �l •�� ■1 ■1 �� til ■11 ■I ■ ��.��� 11tl1 _IN ■_I■ I�Illlllil ■ �� ■ IMilfifClw111 �e gl ■Il��a_ mill tl�li ■1����•�tii��� ��� _�� llill� ■1 ■ ��! ■ ,� �i11J ■% �■� ■1 �� ■1 ■ ��■= �Itl���! ■ �� ®11�� ■�� ■ ■ ■1 ■ of �� ■ ,Ilfl�l�l�lt� I ■ ■ �� ■ _ �� - � n■lin�•lr����■■i�i�i ■ i�■■■�-l:n�ii MINN :J _ f'y'1•- �' a' 16' Scale: 3" = 8'- 0" Aetal panel, silver metallic itu¢o, color C 1VAC grill, paint to match adjacent cdorl IrickA nck B EAST ELEVATION 7 PE AIICMITECrS 1.95 .,M PE N. SURE 100 aU4 as s3i0s113S 16511 N39i00 I Fax 16$O NS -1101 wwx.pppeart� tan BYERLYS FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT Schafer • Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -25 -13 F1alr rlvLL M /35/13 Cwwaa/Plaw Sq/raW _ DS/D7113 ky11a1 BUILDING C ELEVATIONS 15336 -31051 aN A3.8 65 sf Sign 9' -0" h x 18' -D" w Internally lit _ 45 sf Sign 4' -0" h x 11' -6" w Internally lit 93 sf Sign 8' -6" h x 20' -0" w Internally lit Store Partner Signage beyond column - See Store Partner Signage detail 55 sf Sign 8' -0" h x 16' -0" w Internally lit NW Corners at France Ave and Hazleton Rd SW Cafe Entry at Main Elevation Main Entry NE Corner facing Hazelton entry drive Byerly's Store Signage 10 sf Retail sign band 4' -6" high sign band with 24" high letters 20' -0" Building A - North Entry I lding B - North Entry Building C - South Entry Housing - Entry Signage 12' -0" 100 sf Pylon sign 0' 16' 32' Building C - c; ra.t icetail Building B - West Retail Housing -Typical Retail Signage Final Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN 04/24/13 15226 11051 ■ � Schafer Richardson 0' 16' 32' Main Entry columns Store - Partner Signage Detail D 4' ANDERSON COMPANIES Natural stone veneer 15' -0" 45 sf Monument sign 60 sf Development Sign • 10' -6" 4'-3" 2' -0" h x 30'-D" w o Poured concrete retaining v OR r' FRANC r 4 corner at France Ave Main Entry drive SW West Entry drive from Hazelton Promenade SW corner at France Ave Main Entry drive East Entry drive from Hazelton Development Signage 0' 8' 16' Final Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN 04/24/13 15226 11051 ■ � Schafer Richardson 0' 16' 32' Main Entry columns Store - Partner Signage Detail D 4' ANDERSON COMPANIES Metal Coping and standing seam metal roofing 4" x 12" Thin Brick - single highlight course Precast Concrete Panels, scored, Buff color 7 Natural aFnd manuf2:tured 4" x 12" Brick Blend Byerly's Store Materials Final Development Plan Byerly's - France Ave. Re- Development EDINA, MN 04/24/13 15226 -11051 Metal Panel and coping, gunmetal gray Stucco, colors B (top), A, and C (bottom) Metal Panel, silver metallic ■ ■Schafer • �' Richardson 4" x 12" Brick Blend A 4" x 12" Brick Blend B Housing Materials ANDERSON COMPANIES CanynM1rn,ivv NM1llep f Wwlaprn�n[ SYVkn I ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY o<- LB ED /NA LLC or' LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 7, YORKTOWN WITH TOPOGRAPHY HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ■ PROPERIYGESCR /�ve�u..er u. i.wn rv.r ..wmr nu. nn. dmrne. Cmrmn . x> • . � .� — — — �- — _ — e�m•.rwm.m�rxa�.,mm,a.r�mrcrm r e�e r x.��k=r�..rm�.mre.wa Im',•�,'; --�m '..y:. s "._ .•� ,�,, ; � 1-0 - �.�. � �.r :.• ,..w•re., x...w• wrrr mm,. I::°°o °e::f "•_w w.mor eo.."wr b.w..,.m.0 .wr».• .r eern�. at.. ,. �..I._. x „M.,a ew„,r. I I so so •..�' � � l I '.�� --� _ _ ewUa �•mrm t � � . ue. • at. Fels IMxN I aeai�.z..par f ° ".. r). n, It x�• ��Ililllk,1'G l';IIIIIIIIII I_I'I�I ,_ P :: I © I( II I Id I I BO rLO'_r a 'ztzn .ou .ae, •..• "e I f aap I �rvoe x- o,n- x•- xx -n00e � yp I I I I I ✓� I I V I I I I I l l f l l: I �• n r tgp I�. o^ � � I I a ".nwn a .m.e �-. a "m.., �,.� " „e.” eamw -» ... •,wtea. ,,,.,, _wwa.. IEq I Ilkh11111111T11i _ _ "w a" m. "'I I r_m,ro. e,etw IZ i O g�q1� I I I I d I I SII I I I I` no nz- oze- z.- ::- �;lt -• 1 r •�,•II n ••� = so a., . t e� {di' 11 II 1 111 I I I ly'II I I II j .u. e I _ % I '•I� ro s I a . wm..r .m .gym. ro rww....,.. m xm m .,,a a.m..r.a wmrc .o-m.. we rrn rm..1 -11, et, xx Y P e .• .e• ro m•w a .. ro. e Her m mdra . on aen •..•n gds. IIIIIIIIdIII.I d L_I 1 I I I PRA S 10 .Y ` L d% I3 n � of "�I�I I I I — IA-1 I I I I Lirp, R p ) (� L I �1 1 I� l�� ry F• y nr" i 'r y��l 1111 —I fl kFl I I II I I� IJ "t's'i ^.o�ry rytlrU• :•i�...: a� �— •� -�_ I !� ter, /�� i � � e i - �;°i°".:,'a'"�'M �p I AI I I'•,I IS I I IY I I I I'I I Il • :,n_ �I �' ���C f — — � . /ice:` a:e`•".'� P� 2i2 s. L II�I�.IIVIWTIil.11h IL71L� �11r11'111�iHiII.II -II (w�p awoxm w.rwfsar_s amn. m LLR� t \ ro e rNm t zm rm. uf[ c w'i 1. x` xo wm poa) m amgi•rd ...toe u•u.ma• non um / /' / •nr voml s , . r a a wean•a er u• f•awu Cm "a•tr ummm.mr .xm., •x•ora• I I. W1 J Ii 1. li rl.l I I Il rhl_I I � Il�l_Fl I�� �,. _ �� ,/ / ""• �.,�• Fri I �-b l i 111 T r ITI r I N u �Tr Ti �t.[I -I o-- —✓ ��; ryo ;; �m n "., nw H ro r..r .� n.. t.w•m. �.m,. - _:�•..., _ A�x.,.,>,.�..__ %� _. ^_ J�p ^» l O,�,c„a::,..xw�.'a" .. rr. _ r..• m.. �.. •.�...ar.r..•a..m..e...,.,r.m,. if _ _ ^ so sD - -1�� 111III•HIIII I rhrlF ill }II IIL�7�1 111l111l1111111 rJTliIIII1 �1� O�mV'I(Ilil j / "`" "`�'"" "' °•'�""` 41 11 Q O % „// i / ',.. w ,,,.m••,. "n•.....,.- .�w.rm•.._. "m....w ' illlkV1 IFl ?T•r, _ �_�j +L?,` I! one__. n..,.a ".. ..,.r.� ",.�.r �. ..r,... III,131I� — - - -- /n. —ww n ro __ .w...m.. .. .• r.. l C1 LL ,el jII.Y2ejj ;'s i ! yam..•,- �l i' ' y,W 7" ` ®N gg18°n " , c�L ) °.o / '\ OrMr. ITI 11 o ,�x �. yti / l�• III � * „4VI � ° no-er..:a _ o•�/ i�ir � T O : ....._..._ Lw► d 1 171,1 I I W :r�s. C.64 , — _ - - -- _ - -- _- _---- ---- - - - - -- - - --- ---_ -- i ! �c Y w J� .6xtl I - °r: fir•.!.. — - — - _ =— � / �. — ■PARK /NG LIX/N /� ,�. • r•.. �r•+.�r.••rr...wwwworwrn...+..v s. wrn. zm.. a�..n ” _ SeOe'5w...� _. �Y�$,.� •.�:,. n. row..wx.,a.v, 15 �,, .'::; e.: e•::. i•"+ .... "rw.`�.J;M ".'°.P.;.,'C: "4Yw .w.uo_.,_r �•.... rwe. 11 LP ■ LEE — ■ &4S /S OFBEAR /NGS — . re m+r� /� // \H \\ �r�e rowrc. a•or"w •mm,r r_ `' . • w ! n,•sT[ $S 0 BENLHxWARK u n.veo-am�e I �r \ n^ I _ •e ®n• ar mz xeu,ena w n.•ee ..wue ■SURFACES - S \ / m ro.•wmo ramw wm.0 - r n \DETAIL / o ��a z �:i _ f a• A s a 7 E j � W h o z w .p ti o 5 o ° 2 m N Q ti z o i � H n Z h n O f � Z N •y'v - AN [o CAL F I Z" GOPHER� TA T nKlF 65 1. INU. 1 BOD-2. .;N 11, "C N ROAD a 7' gKOING LEGEND TS 0 Q CEBEP A. I* (R(Fb� BE TREE To me! 11 US RX.-D I—) "MA�E -ITIT) sAm K N 85- A I.L-1364.4(Mll SID cl =MN AN REBER 70 BE EDDj1.'_- TE PE.—B END!. E., —1. ( !:% Z' B'-M =) I MBEMEN T" BE, 196.9 3655 Hazelton Rood Edina, MN 55435 Trustee Et Al Blair Wolfson Trus 7- (P—TC UTUTB TO BE REA-D OP M I -El OPTIC .1 M— —n C.—MICB) E .80). 7171 France Avenue S. 47.9 Do 33.0 Edina, MN 55435 MEN— Do A!BP 59,359 sqft. 47.9 L! 4" CI FFE-869.51 5.1 DO R 0 --TON -1 11�. IL —E.. 1.) LU z MP f L A I J I LL BBI I yr Z R�E, C� w I 1 1 1 1 k! B— I 0E,B- 150.2 v)o5 L Z < N L z LI L) LL BI —65-1 —"*—IIT SANI— w GIZ�_ 1. - -- — — - 0 EZ"2' a V" w—pmk D SEPEN A u), z 3o Do "J—'IA' J z 0 S— IN CET U A —Am— REMOVAL NOTES E.--TOR SNAU- FIELD —1 —I..S AND E—ONS 1A, F . .... �' XIC 14 AU I EDIATEILT N TV[ NINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS, ALL EXISTING UILITY LOCAIONS SNOW ME APPROIIATE. ZF ICENt PI 0.NER, CONTACT GDPNER STATE ONE CA T -A -OOD2) FOR V z 0 ^u ANNOL�1. BE— (65 C54 UTILITY TLOCATIONS 48 HOURS PRIOR EX ATION. ZQw 55- 1—V I I I ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO K. ....... .. RE—L& REFER TO STORMWATER POLLUTION E PRE—TON . < z' PLAN FOR EROSBON CONTROL ED TE EXISTING PRIVATE U—S F \I� M I ' / 1/ ' // AS NECESSARY, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTI—Es CONTRACTOR TO RE—/NEI-OCA 1IU1 COMPANIES, �—�l A 7 rL*Ts DITRACTOR IS RESION&BLE FOR ALL REMOVALS NOTED ON PL— ALL PERMITS, APPUCATEQNS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSID:UTY OF IIE —ACTOR. SALVAGED FOR POTENTIAL REINSTAILLAFON. Au- TRAFFIC SIGNS MTENIN STE SMALL BE REIMOWD AND -34. 11-d 9-1 Imoul i 7 BYERLY'S ADDITION rI y mzz Yxa Oam oO Woo 04 11 Z AN 6�e W / RLK 71 FRANCE L------------------------------- ----------- - - --.� ., r ===== T ----------------------- _____ _____T_________________________ T_ 1l:.uw.n.,m.i. II cvwn Ra Fn i� d°'°rcu o."r'i` II � I II I e iC; FGaI I .. W y� is Pg b3`� / RLK .. I �T�.u,� II a I � I "ii � .ter -- - - - • X11 -�� . � _ I i I- °,.m ._ - a°,...... �' i � I .,. - += F---- --- = = = - y�. III °I v I , a / RLK I Z W 'a W 1 LL i TRASH 7171 FRANCE AVENUE BYERLY'S FFE =866.0 uZakJ CONCRETE i al! 11410 1 WO W-14F. 44 HSG B FFE= 869.60 7121 FRANCE AVE HSG C FFE =871.0 OF EXISTING BUxDING IIBLIC ART (MD) 7141 FRANCE AVE HSG A FFE= 869.60 WATER OTHERS BY OTHERS ; IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r\ PLAN xDRTx SIGN BENCH SEATING FBRIDGE PROMENADE BENCH SEATING BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT Mee Schafer 9E Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES I I FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 42413 SITE PLAN mrma Rb 4441] P.•.w®e vr� mee� m, Anq omq xua Al.l - . -- -- —_ -- - 1 --_ - -- .. __,,"':_— CALL - - -_ Niz— Ilow onovpmtrs RV oIlmis r wa Td n.. - ssz nes g ; 'i n �!I -- - - - - -- �T -ten " , . wTD, PDN, N,~ S LEGEND / r x FnNNAU ANB SON NIK. L. . -. • .`. �r �y�^— .IM.m,L.,WNOB -- - -- - - - ..I— rIT - - - -- -. GEN � aR� I II I CUT _'fir_ GOT4 I HSG C' rz PONT 18,112 SF I { i. II I II f III I FFE =871.0 BYERLYS I'i t 47,119 SF 1 m - j IIi i FFE =8fi6.0 li i I jl ij.L l T: IPRmoo°o'I uzAwR�o••Au10 IIIIIIIi o _ - i f IN SCALE � ... QQQO aDIE •waA � � „ . -. ... m... a - - E�.s : M . _ .. ,, O Y '`•.� S + I O b m — 0E•'A .wa I !I � Y: M.n .. - - --- - -- I SITE DATA i i II i I 6 i jl II j - RP �: a ®QQ .IOm KapinE oho, —1 I ji I in - .. .- ! - -- --- --- PARCEL pESCNPTOE PARCEL AREA BUBDNC AREA ' PANNED PROVIDED LOT 1 • 9J AL HT,119 SF 18A STALLS - lOT 3 1 m AC AC 30 Sb SF 31.51) 4 1B $TALI$• I4 STAllS• LDT a LTS Ac +B.9m ss 96 STALLS• LOTAL: 9.6J AC 61.163 SF JA3 STALLS Fn EC m Woa O¢NT' "G07 1 _� ( REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR TOTAL PARKING m W Z. 'I II II 1 I dF STALLS PROVDED, INCLUDING UNDERGROUND PARKING '�•. f�.LfII Im I! ° I �.I! 1, I ' t07 -3- CO I I Z¢a W j I I f �yi . w •if R RBea A - - II I _ O I f u HSGB I , SITE NOTES. wN° I;II 21,533 SF / 1 - { 6 FFE = 869.60 _ - ` cpNTRACTNe sxAU Fmn vENDY. LOCA n AND ELEVAnous a r ! II f� aF ExISTND u11UTff3 AxD ToPOmAPNC FEATURES PRwn TO - Z• UT THE —CEMENT OF SITE -A... THE CONTRA .. ¢ . SHALL IMN[NATELT NO— THE ENGINEER of —M CS i, I 1 1117 - + . • Im -mn � r aR vARUnoxs feOM ME PLANS _ ` I � i I: IVY 5[uW /• T � .• �f PAVSIG / ALL N ARE TO ME FACE Of CURB UNLESS 4 MEA4 E.G. HSG A BUILNNG DIMENSIONS REFER TO THE — GE.GCE OF - 20,530 SF BUILNNG UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.. I! 0 0 0'3 0 o o u i IIjI _- FFE = 869.60 ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I ALL CURB. AND HITTER TO BE 5512 UNLESS OMERMSE NOTED. 01 sal, 1 ` 0 •SBB K PEDESTRUVI RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL CURB - -L'N CROSSINGS OF SID EIKALX. - tn Ca / / SIGNAGE^& STRIPING NOTES .i Zlo- i ___ _ __________________ CONTBACTOR AS SHALL BE RESPNJ THIS ALL SITE 9GNAGE :Q u AND s N - uTY1i•fAmtOIT . ✓ I i II L ^% ✓1� d Gay pIRB B11G6 —CAPPED I¢�.umlC — — — wIp ENSLNB PPED PARKING FRONDED PER MA, CODE. ,- TEN PONT . •/ ' w / CONTRACTOR DCAPPE LOGOS P T AND CROSS AHATCH H,NNDIGP ED GGG HDICAPPED STALLS. JT[R rtoTI�J ' LO-NG AISLES WITH PAVEMENT MARKING PANT. E• IN WIOM. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY /ALL ORECnONAL TRAFFIC N .. .. ARROWS. AS SHONN. IN WHILE PAINT. W CURB / / PAINTED ORpSSWALK$ TO BE 3'.6' PAINTED 81111E BLOCKS 1 ' I j 1� II iIt (Tw) wRN J• SPA— z 1' I IF-• III I ! I I(�, I I 1 I 1 ALL SIGNACESHALL NCLUDE POST. CONCRETE FOOTING AND - as iSTEEL CA9NG WHGE REWIRED. a.. . I I i i- i i IQ l ALL o eaNOT PRRO PROTECTED ro CURS. ®w s i i c�°ONisw . LLa I RULED " CONCRETE AND PANTED rELLOw (SEE `DN n B O1 ANY /ALL STOP SIGNS TO INCLUDE A 2E• RIDE PAINTED STOP BAR. IN WHITE PANT. PLACED AT, THE STOP SINE LOCATION A 1, I ; / / t " I • I I MINIMUM OF <' FROM MOS6WAI.R. IF APPUGBLE. ALL' STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN TO THE U All SIGNS 1D WE PLACED 10" BEHNO ME BACK K CURB va ! I Fn UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.In J. � � |� |) ! ` � | a . U � , \\\ e»» Lo \I cn $ r d! «[ §m[ �} § ) � 2 Ej3 I AA V) \\\ v) Z w 10.1. o z La Z Oj a I z 0 S % z Z < GOPHER be— " be- dgg�g ONE STATE CALL X TN F 1-800- 25II,11611 UH M 17 71, SCALE FEET BENCHMARK • HSG C p. p: 2 SF;; -� =U NE .1 1. .1-- ON-— • - SS1.0 (UM29) kRl_�S UTILITY NOTES W" I 47,J19 FFE=866 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MD.0 LOCAII.. A. ELEVATIONS OF E UM 0 AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO ME COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHAM MMEDIAMI NOTIFY ME CHOWDER OF DISCREPANCIES OR WIAITONS MOM ME PI.AWS. 2. AM S NO UTILITY LOCATIONS SHORN ME APPROXIMATE. CONTACT I, 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (651-454-10001) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS HOURS PRIM TO EKCAVAYOW. I 8 3. WATER MAIN. SANITARY SERER & STORM SEINER CDRSMUCM)N SHALL TO THIS CURREN .11. OF ANTIARD SPTCIMA_ RN WATER MAIN AND SECE UNIZE INSTALLATION AND S,NNITMY SEWER AND SFDRON SCwT.R WSTNU.ATOW AS PREPARED BY ME CITY E- 2=41 ASSOCIATION OF MN.mou (LEAN). MPED A CA_ — AND MAN-BLES - P_ AREAS SNALL BE MT. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GLIFTERS SHALL HE SUMPED 0." 0.04 S DEIAR.& RN ELEVATIONS SHOWN OR THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT PER wl R, _UL� ALL MAYERIALS SHALL BE SPECIFIED IN CRAY SEPCIFICATTORS EXCEPT AS c__ ERED1. AM NAITERI SHALL COMPLY IRTH ME REQUIREMENTS OF E ALL S,MITARY SEWD? TO BE I MR-31 UNLESS TO BE ALL STORM SEWER TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WITH R-4 MINTS. AND RUBBER CASKETS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. L5 J B. A HYDRANTS SHAM BE WCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB 0 H LILL M ILUI I LmS OF HER .SE NOTED. m5z T1*1=.= 'Ij T. TYPICAL HYDRANT QQ OF: HYDRANT. GATE -IL IL5- OF S' DIP WATERMAN AND MY HYDRANT �N. HYDRANT EXTEMSONS SHALL BE .-ENTAI- % P.s K A< & A MINUMUM Of 7.5 FEET OF EERIER IS KOURRED OVER AM INAITYTIMAN. UNLESS OTHERIMSE NOTED. OJEPTH MAY SE REQUIRED ITT .1 C. N SEWER A .— OF IS' MERMIAL SERAURAYM 1. SANYTARY OR C) C. U, w- 91 UNES. HSG B I % AMINTILIUM OF 18 WCHMIOF �ERMCAL MP TION D 21;533SI/ H b, ONTAL SEPOON S FITELARED FCIT AM JITUM. UFDESfi OTHERITISE ..TED. FFE=889.60 7 NJ 10. CE0,71TACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS PLANS CONSIROUl ON AND SUBMIT THEM PLANS TO CHCONEER UPON COSIPLEFON N; _j CONTRACTOR REFER 0 ARCH-1URN. PUNS FOR MCI LOCATIONS AIMMEHSCNS OF VESTIBULE. COTS. UMPS. MUM DMS. PREOSE BUTUDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATION& 'D -7:7 12. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE ME PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ME DISTURBED BY UN TY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE FESTERED IN KIND. SOO AREAS SHAM BE RESTORED WIN 8 INCHES OFT PLACED BENEATH ME WD. 1M ME COMMACTM SHAM BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFg,2NymoLm Z in =& M CONTROL ME MOMEMENT OF TRAFFIC TMHERE NE TRAFFIC 0 CMT D. DEMCES MUST CTINIFORM TO MIN DEPARYMENT OF A- STANDARD& in 177 577 14. PRIOR V PLACEMENT OF ACME TE EASE. A TEST ROM MILL. BE w SS RECED M ME MEET AND PAB`M AREA "B"""i CM�E A E Z 0 THE BERLS EN AREAS THE IN AR ONECTa OF _E`R AND SHALL BE AS DROCTITTED 11 ME I DETERMINE VNION SECTIONS OF ME STREET OR PA JUNG UNSTABRUL COME TON OF ME SUBGRADE — — BE COMPLETED IN — — — — --- ACCOICANCE - THE RECIARENJEHYS OF ME 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BUTOM., - —S —7 MANINCLE AND CATCH BASN STIOLUCTURNES M ME ENTRNEER. INGOS SHALL AMERY NE WDRIDNO DAYS FOR SHOP DRARUNG REVIEW. 16. ME CONTRACTOR AND THEM SLIPPURP SHALL DETERMINE THE MIMUM L'i DIME1111 REWRED FOR EACH STORM SEM STRUCTURE 17. ALL UTTJYES ARE TO WITHIN 10 FEET OF EUIUDWO, COORDINATE FINAL BUILDING CONNECTUNS WIN MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. 1' I , l ! ' I I I{!1 I I I I � ' Iii lI� I --�- m ' +. [- at>, 1I _ m-, - 'Ira .� ..1 .ir , I D �II I ! � # � "i._!. �! ' ' - i -:l II '- , i i Ii -- i -! i .! .. ' - ..i _ .: -II - :! _ I 1 I _.�iI L ! 1 - i f. -I . ,- _I ' L .'ii 1 - 4f;� . - _ r I -' .', I I , --i - - r f - ..r I : _ � �'• 'I Ir '� B'P'S � .�f ,; / ,/ I I / / 1 I i I 18. PIPE UENONS ARE ESTIMATED FOR DESCH PURP DEFUCING WTER MAN MINTS TO A MAMUM OF 2' TO ACHIEVE ALICHMENT IS ALLOWED. 1 1 7 1 1 APPRMD EW- 19. MANHOLE AND CATCH BASIN CASTINGS SHAM BE HUMAN OR 'N V�w Q Q 20. COMM OR SHALL PROTECT ALL UMUTTES NOT REMOVED By DEMMY OPERATION& TREE PROTECT) SNAM. BE MAINTAINED UNNY1. AM ON v 1 __C1" IS COMPLETE I GENERAL NOTES 1. R� x wuc mlxu suwsmox[ wLis °x- .N =000:) PmRMio s�rRms i M Al® R[3ONCi v wOAwSF M A wOF U,ID9' UMIS w ON wffi.FiA /�!!O[,G:RMrmnq .Pmm�W , ,[ MY� MSIYIRGx NO R.MID 06T,LIRIJ6 mx TI�1 �wrau m°Ei 1p 4Dae0°mr ,m'�"lu uA°a .m[enn .io s lm ui[u xolm ro e< Am w ,u w¢, ro e¢ cR.oEO. awr aumw R[eumRm Rlen6 nnn u.� � +o�'RUwulm auu s [mon m M AT1D[na! ar M wn:ztt ,�6Y,TERYL SY6lfRRGB RL s ,�,m M.� .wwawL s � M � CRY A,n NNDIOAR aw]RID:! M M 41pSL1P[ CWIPA['IM mm ro M SVBI®JN M • p Arn /OR a01,TnN ' IRRIGATION NOTES !. u .rt coxrwnox swu a RowraaE rm! man. a, vn owRQ •MFR m00uG ,16E LYLL 2 �ROIm @t M 4WSW[ tAWMi¢f AR m x[01. R. V[AT p'bfw0 /wpp� m11G,W ST011pATON �flRG,t0. M �IOG,iW %L w2 — M iuOn RPMX M'fM0! PROP[MY C1wB wRA[ IIIY Lu6fM wmDNpni ,RL uRDY.VF COMR R[S1d69f0 T u DvT[CRY ,RWt u!� ABMUlG BuLDRn mOxO,inN, RNO /NRx ��� n mw[u[Im OGAYiE io M Prov[Pa sR[Mmn . wio io F vrt wauw. — CONIFEROUS TREE Rlemxs� w To sue rRm: xouLVUL TxE mnRrnme b NL M[5 w , PVMD POmnN T1NPnxoN M[ DUNVwi , Y W TpQ ilaRW ,w[ NlaIS,R,T[A R[Ya[ Ai MAST -1 DF M xRG ,xTU[. AIn BMW IRO! BRB P01R5. PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS �. owx a io•: ,wmwim u�uu � .wL¢�Rnm'�an�mw,wTUm m . Y.lxuY 1/IWYSE i0P SOR EIIAV, SR[ wn PwmND xOL[5 ,In 1¢1l YxOD,�S{Q S ^CV,GnP6. IOLw[ NL Of&6 N,� @uw.�N eY.wYT. sPEC[� m,a`o`mn wuamf O�vml M nwnrw soa w+ ra w�iY�KBO�NbTMinwb ulIIS Yo,Fn aR6R6E M uwsnx Pws u,ss uwu sn[ w,nwv ma �mev cY�wm .tm ,uw o�.•'v sa wm�iuYw low � w ww RYY Qr. NO TIT I'M SOI��� C0 �[,R[ A�PROwn[ ,OD N VWn LYW4PF[m�P[ItMO 5„RNC. r P6nUID. wmv m owl R®IUCC w AAN m ww s Iwaw" F.=m"— DDS xm sr.L[ MY.A P. Pu�xo o[ ml w�nw".Iar umir r�mm�il nel�ixa'� PLANTING NOTES wrt =m mmR NO _ _umn9 Yrtx , wsrc uc r1o� sYu aWI,C[5, taltH[D ORIAE M loaf rREAS Sill u nuu a., oR w oRwxrcc svaua M�sao�s uL a[�nroumrozix[Y ARMS omuRam o,rt ro DR.nwc vnoR Txw lwsc ARUS N— m O— RLPYR AlL I—E ro PWP[RM moo P—M w4R,T0N5 AT NO — TO M ORi¢ DECIDUOUS TREE �sra mxm.,;mrs a.mx ro sw,<[ TRUS. wYnw, ra maP.cTw b R)�R u�uw0 ,Rb1 w A wN0 mSRIM ,WtlXGM M nTDRYrz u[Txow ar Taa s,uan ,I¢ uus,wTm REwa ., uwsr xoF a M .FS TYw[, um wmAP rmY Ren nnna m�>�xnTriRis (,rvj ,R¢ Rw ro rwsl eRnn! SHRUB wm LcosOl xm,s OF wwPmR[D (11) v[uvrt Nt Mwsr xur a M Rv¢ ,rRr• .lo mooAV FROU wre wAxrs. OR .ew1 F rsl¢n ro• Dfa sxRm� Dwi6s wn[D anmaq same �1ou um �¢ of m m v v D2 - DETAIL PLANTING PLAN NOTE — ' nnR so®IU ON wasw[ wAn my cool ANO ,AxosrAm ro,w cot b H— DNTwR 4ODFo GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T- 00.. ATw Bbl -as, -root MIL T. FIU 1- BOD -25i -1166 D3 - DETAIL PLANTING PLAN NOTE Ru[R ro PLwr soYOwE ox wnscNC P,uN PERENNIAL _ o wx s,Rls ,Y..) ROOT mL,AR m B[ twd NOTE: NO LDOSEN R0 OF D— WERIZED -E— (TYP.) (UNLESS IUU Aw M NOTED DTHMME) SWRb BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO MD. ox suocanc ROOT IULIM 10 BE LEVEL OR SLIOMRY ABCVE FINISHED GRADE. v[c. ARIES NULCH - 3• DEEP ARIES PuIRNn SR - sT SEE PUN SSHREODED DwooD samr tol,w, ro L x,wDn 10P602 - SQ SmG �RAj•µp� w00D STA¢ 5• P.V.C. EDGING ERER TO PUN FOR RErTR ,D ruN mR DROUxD SUttMD[ GROUND cwER BGRADE - 3. OEP1N (Mlle. - '::•.•. . -. .•�.•• ..'., -. SOIL - _ EE S SPED. - - - - - - SEE SPEC. DECIDUOUS TREE �sra mxm.,;mrs a.mx ro sw,<[ TRUS. wYnw, ra maP.cTw b R)�R u�uw0 ,Rb1 w A wN0 mSRIM ,WtlXGM M nTDRYrz u[Txow ar Taa s,uan ,I¢ uus,wTm REwa ., uwsr xoF a M .FS TYw[, um wmAP rmY Ren nnna m�>�xnTriRis (,rvj ,R¢ Rw ro rwsl eRnn! SHRUB wm LcosOl xm,s OF wwPmR[D (11) v[uvrt Nt Mwsr xur a M Rv¢ ,rRr• .lo mooAV FROU wre wAxrs. OR .ew1 F rsl¢n ro• Dfa sxRm� Dwi6s wn[D anmaq same �1ou um �¢ of m m v v D2 - DETAIL PLANTING PLAN NOTE — ' nnR so®IU ON wasw[ wAn my cool ANO ,AxosrAm ro,w cot b H— DNTwR 4ODFo GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T- 00.. ATw Bbl -as, -root MIL T. FIU 1- BOD -25i -1166 D3 - DETAIL PLANTING PLAN NOTE Ru[R ro PLwr soYOwE ox wnscNC P,uN rox mE,ru vaosAP[ roVaa o C= Rh # 8E 2 E23 � i s�aa In b EC O0JON 5w MZww7 �fJDy Yy¢ Z ., Oa v_, (n OO wa0 Z F QN OW, H C (L 0 2 z < u El 01 w � L o U� a < = ^�9 0 5 R— c b.. b., t, 1. t, 1, .,1 _T7 it GOPHER STATE CALL 1, b MK T , -aO0- 252-1155 o F� T� b' b, b., 1, I.IAI b. 1 b.� I b\ 11, 1., b. I .1 1.. • —1.1 :,_1..,' I HSG C 18,112 SF FFE=871.0 1 b., b., U U U 1, I I., U 1. so b.. At U 1. 1� U b.. 1: Al LI 11 a, 11 U I b. U b., b., t� t, b Q�. e, b, .1 k* 1.� b.. b. BYERL'rS —21a3" M 14' FLEX — b.. b. 47,119 SF FFE=866.0 lin -Ii D. b. I I., 1. 1.. 1., 11 1., 11 1, p- lv HSG B 21,533 SF FFE=869.60 t, U 1x A-- 1— 1 1- 0 HSG A 20,530 SF FFE=869.60 El ... ....... 10 I g I z —40K 1 O.B-0 9256 I05.0 B2 -IDQ Io5-7 19 Claud q alt ]q1A- C,'25i9- VS]M- WeSt- <ItILP�I 0.0'11 5956 BB 021!141 I.A. 2101 Ill,mlrma 11.1114.11" Cd H H— b,f,, dEgghg GOPHER STATE CALL 1, b MK T , -aO0- 252-1155 o F� T� 0 do ,Z, b., 1. II U b, I.. I., HSG C 18,112 SF FFE=871.0 1 b., b., U U U 1, I I., U 1. so b.. At U 1. 1� U b.. 1: Al LI 11 a, 11 U I b. U b., b., t� t, b Q�. e, b, .1 k* 1.� b.. A-- 1— 1 1- 0 HSG A 20,530 SF FFE=869.60 El ... ....... 10 I g I z —40K 1 O.B-0 9256 I05.0 B2 -IDQ Io5-7 19 Claud q alt ]q1A- C,'25i9- VS]M- WeSt- <ItILP�I 0.0'11 5956 BB 021!141 I.A. 2101 Ill,mlrma 11.1114.11" Cd H H— b,f,, dEgghg GOPHER STATE CALL MK T , -aO0- 252-1155 o F� T� 0 mzz 0 REF —21a3" M 14' FLEX — Z w < lin n! p- :Z, (n 01 ,io <1 u K 0 mzz —21a3" M 14' FLEX — Z w < :Z, (n 01 ,io <1 u K o- o- o- T I� o- -- 4 4 (D MEZZANINE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN v BYERLYS FRANCE AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT E ■ Schafer UM Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -24 -13 FIRST LEVELAND MEZZANINE FLOOR PLANS ,ma -,mss A2.1 POPE ARCHITECTS BYERLY'S --------------------------------------------------------- - PARKING LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN -0" BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT rays Schafer Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES � r FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -24 -13 BUILDINGS A & B PARKING LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN Plant Oe.xe isosiron Hl N 0 6 Storage I i 21 Bike 15 Storage 15 Storage 3 15 13 I I I 15' 9 4 I Property Line I I Bike Storage .4i 3 3 9 Elev Lobby 7B Stalls 20 Bike Spaces 64 Stalls 41 Storage Units Bike 28 Bike Spaces Storage Storage 8 I 3 I 13 i i 4 m m ° Gen Unexcavaled Up E Unexcavated forage — I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 ------------------------------- I --------------------------------------------------------- - PARKING LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN -0" BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT rays Schafer Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES � r FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -24 -13 BUILDINGS A & B PARKING LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN Plant Oe.xe isosiron Hl I — — — — — — — — — -- -- I -- — — — — — — — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — I — — — — — QPARKING LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN �z .Z -i-0 BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT Elm Schafer Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 42413 BUILDINGS A & B PARKING LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 111 I Storag 6 Mech I y y 21 Bike 15 I Mech Pet Wash Storage I P Pump Room 3 I I 11 14 13 I I 15 I a i I I y k I Bike I d Storage Treshj 3 3 9 Trash I 59 Stalls Bike 77 Stalls I 28 Bike Spaces Storage 20 Bike Spaces ike Storage I Storage 8 15 p D 4 -- -- I -- — — — — — — — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — I — — — — — QPARKING LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN �z .Z -i-0 BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT Elm Schafer Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 42413 BUILDINGS A & B PARKING LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 111 BYE R LY'S v 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 cresa Poop J C1 UPPER LEVELS TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN BYERLY'S FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■ ■ Schafer Richardson ANDERSON . COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 42413 BUILDINGS A & B UPPER LEVELS TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN H4 i Level 6 Plan of Loft Units Hs 3/32 — BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT ■ Schafer Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL • DEVELOPMENT PLAN 42413 SIXTH LEVEL PLAN OF LOFT UNITS iszzs.nmr cn.�w H5 LOft/ROOf Plan Buildings A&B Z.. a 1%. BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE-DEVELOPMENT ■ Schafer Up Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL , DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -24 -19 LOFT /ROOF PLAN BUILDINGS A & B iuxsnmr cm.b H6 , Mach Mach ImI I Storage 36 Stalls 15 Bike Spaces Up to Exit 37 Stalls 11 15 Bike Spaces T 12 Up 18 m 'm m Storage 7 m Mach e Stora Down to LL 36 Stalls 15 Bike Spaces Up to Exit AN 11 T 18 Storage 7 m 'm n Bldg C Parking Level 2 Bldg C Parking Level 1C ParkinD Level 1 H� may =��• Hr �,., �.P FRANCE AVENUE RE- DEVELOPMENT ■ ■ Schafer MTN Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 42413 BUILDING C PARKING LEVELS PN. H7 a n Bldg C Level 1 (z1:Bldg. C Level 2 BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■ Schafer lqm Richardson ANRERSON COMPANIES I FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4.24 -13 BUILDING C LEVELS 18 2 �'MMB C�actar H8 POPE ARCIIITECTS 5/ BYE R LY'S i ■ `�7 T�1 POPE ARCHITECT'S \/ BYE R LY'S i ■ cresa r (1 Ver 3 L Average FFE above grade: 01 .. Is. S.le: 1 " =8' -0" 11LIM • mmmomm MWEER- �mm� 111�=Epp- �_m— WI®.110_ Rooftop equipment (to be determined) Metal coping, gunmetal gray Aluminum sunscreen, gunmetal gray Metal panel, silver metallic Stucco, color C Vertical metal picket guardrail at balcony, 3' -6" high Metal dad, gunmetal gray opening 5ignage (by owner) Aluminum storefront entry door 1" Insulated glass in aluminum storefront system SOUTH ELEVATION Average FFE above grade: D' 1. 16' Sra)e:1 " =8' -0" WEST ELEVATION POPE ARCHITECTS AxA a—x, suns xw sT. 1A.4 Mx 551W -x)35 BYERLY'S FRANCEAVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT Mi Schafer Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 425 -13 y aw: rel .1tsm Devebprenl P� BUILDING C ELEVATIONS �,�,y xszzl:ttost a.x cesary n— A3.7 1 Average FFE abm 11 -D, L o• s• W Scale: I " =e' -o" NORTH ELEVATION Scale: I" s' - D^ EAST ELEVATION POPE ARCXRECrS vvas eMlouuuw x.wm]ao ST. PAx4 MN SSlaL2i15 Issll6FlAloal FAlf IFsslR.x -1101 ..x..PxP.+rawm FRANCE AVENUE RE -DEVELOPMENT ■ Schafer Ep Richardson ANDERSON COMPANIES FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 -25 -13 er metallic ldjacent color) iue rRn4F: Feel OF /15/13 Dnvo4p PM BUILDING C ELEVATIONS 'iiva R. 15 2 2 6110 51 Heh RH_ �a4 A3.8 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment in Edina, MN January 16, 2013 RLK Project No. 2012 -135 -M Creating extraordinary Communities AfS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment Edina, MN January 16, 2013 Prepared For: rz -- ��� e CITYar e r DINA • �5'',:;,; •,�`'• .For living. learning, raising families & doing business CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Prepared By: /0"M"� RLK INCORPORATED RLK INCORPORATED Minnetonka Office 6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 952- 933 -0972 RLK Project No. 2012 -135 -M RLK Incorporated Page i of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 44 January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M TABLE OF CONTENTS B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND STUDY AREA ......................... ............................... 2 1. Description of Proposed Development ............................................................... ..............................2 2. Map of Site and Street Network .......................................................................... ..............................2 3. Intersections and Roadway Segments to be Analyzed ....................................... ............................... 2 C. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................. ............................... 3 1. Existing Traffic Statistics .................................................................................... ..............................3 2. Existing Roadway Geometrics ............................................................................ ..............................3 3. Operational Analysis Methodology ................................................ :................................................. 5 4. Existing Trip Generation ..................................................................................... ..............................7 5. Existing Queue Lengths ...................................................................................... ..............................8 D. FUTURE PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT ..... 9 1. Changes in Road Network ................................................................................. ............................... 9 2. Background Development Traffic Growth ........................................................ .............................10 3. No -Build Trip Distribution ................................................................................ .............................11 4. Projected No -Build Traffic Volumes ................................................................. .............................12 5. 2015 No -Build Traffic Operations ..................................................................... .............................12 F. FUTURE PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH DEVELOPMENT .............15 1. Proposed Development Phases .......................................................................... .............................15 2. Proposed Directional Distribution ..................................................................... .............................15 3. Proposed Build Trip Generations ....................................................................... .............................18 4. Projected Traffic Operations — 2015 Build ........................................................ .........................:...19 5. Projected Traffic Operations — 2016 Build ...................................................... ............................... 21 6. Projected Traffic Operations — 2016 Build with Restaurant Development to the East ................... 22 G. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS .................................... ............................... 25 H. PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS ........................................................ ............................... 27 I. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOM1VIIr,1VDATIONS ................................ ............................... 28 FIGURES.............................................................................................:........ ............................... 29 APPENDICES.............................................................................................. ............................... 39 RLK Incorporated Page Ti of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 — Project Site .................................................................................................. ............................... 30 Figure 2 — Existing Geometrics ................................................................................... ............................... 31 Figure 3 — Aerial Photo of Existing Conditions ........................................................... ............................... 32 Figure 4 — Existing Peak Hour Turning Movements ................................................... ............................... 33 Figure 5 — 2015 No -Build Peak Hour Turning Movements ........................................ ............................... 34 Figure6 — Proposed Geometrics .................................................................................. ............................... 35 Figure 7 — 2015 Build Peak Hour Turning Movements ............................................... ............................... 36 Figure 8 — 2016 Build Peak Hour Turning Movements ............................................... ............................... 37 Figure 9 — 2016 Build with Restaurant to the East Peak Hour Turning Movements ... ............................... 38 LIST OF TABLES Table1 — LOS Criteria ................................................................................................... ............................... 6 Table 2 — Trip Generation Rates — Existing Byerly's Site ............................................. ............................... 7 Table 3 — Existing Levels of Service .............................................................................. ..............................7 Table 4a — Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths — P.M. Peak Hour'-- Existing Byerly's Site ................ 8 Table 4b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths - Sat. Midday Peak Hour - Existing Byerly's Site ..... 8 Table 5 -- Projected Levels of Service — 2015 No -Build Condition .............................. .............................13 Table 6a -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour -- 2015 No -Build Conditions...................................................................................................................... .............................14 Table 6b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Saturday Midday Peak Hour -- 2015 No -Build Conditions...................................................................................................................... .............................14 Table 7 -- 2015 Build - Trip Generation Estimates 1. — Proposed Site .......................... .............................18 Table 8 -- 2016 Build - Trip Generation Estimates 1. —Proposed Site .......................... .............................19 Table 9 -- Projected Levels of Service — 2015 Build Condition .................................... .............................20 Table 10a -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions.........................................................:........................................................... .............................20 Table 10b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions..................................................................................................................... .............................20 Table 11 -- Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition ................................. .............................21 Table 12a -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions.................................................................................................................... :.............................. 21 Table 12b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions.................................................................................................................... ............................... 22 Table 13 -- 016 Build with Impacts to the East - Trip Generation Estimates 1. — Proposed Site ................. 23 Table 14 -- Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition (With Impact of Parcel to the East) .....23 Table 15a -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions.................................................................................................................... ............................... 24 Table 15b -- Selected 95th Percentile Queue Lengths. — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions.................................................................................................................... ............................... 24 RLK Incorporated Page iii of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M A- -Z A. REPORT LETTER January 16, 2013 Mr. Wayne Houle Public Works Director City of Edina 4801 w. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis — Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment Dear Mr. Houle: The attached report details the traffic impact analysis of the Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment at southeast comer of France Avenue (County Road 17) and Hazelton Road in Edina. The developer, Anderson -KM Builders, is proposing to redevelop the existing grocery store site into a mixed use development. The proposed redevelopment will encompass a new 52,500 square foot grocery store, an additional 20,950 square feet of retail and 234 units of multi - family housing. The redevelopment utilizes two full access intersections onto Hazelton Road, as well as a new right - in/right -out intersection on France Avenue. In addition, there is cross - access to be allowed between this site and the Macy's Furniture Store site to the south. RLK analyzed two peak times in its analysis — Weekday PM Peak Hour and Weekend Midday Peak. These two peak periods reflected the critical time periods among the three main land uses on the site. The report found that the Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment will result in acceptable levels of service for traffic using these intersections during the tested peak hours. The two access points along Hazelton will adequately serve the trips into and out of the site — especially when the easterly intersection is signalized. The right- in/right -out intersection on France will not adversely affect the northbound operation of France Avenue. Therefore, it is recommended that the City of Edina accept these findings in their consideration of the Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment. Sincerely, Stephen J. Manhart, P.E., PTOE, PTP Senior Traffic Engineer Attachment RLK Incorporated Page 1 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 460 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND STUDY AREA 1. Description of Proposed Development Anderson -KM Builders, LLC plans to redevelop an existing Byerly's Store at 7171 France Avenue South in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, MN. The site is to be redeveloped to replace the existing grocery story with a new 52,500 square foot grocery store and additional 20,950 square feet of retail and 234 units of multi - family housing. It is anticipated that the new grocery would be open mid- August of 2014, and the multi - family housing and additional retail would open in phases between mid- November, 2014 and late 2015. The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed redevelopment. 2. Map of Site and Street Network Figure 1 illustrates the development site and the study area street network. RLK analyzed traffic in the area bounded by France Avenue on the west, Hazelton Road on the north, York Avenue South on the east and 72nd Street on the south. RLK also looked at the interaction of trips between the proposed Byerly's redevelopment site and the Macy's Furniture Store to the south. Figure 2 shows the overall street network to be analyzed in the study area. 3. Intersections and Roadway Segments to be Analyzed Existing intersections to be analyzed include: ➢ France Avenue (County State Aid Highway 17) and Hazelton Road ➢ France Avenue (County State Aid Highway 17) and W. 72nd Street ➢ York Avenue (County State Aid Highway 31) and Hazelton Road ➢ Byerly's Main Access and Hazelton Road ➢ Byerly's Service Access and Hazelton Road This study will also focus on the following proposed driveway intersections: ➢ Byerly's new Track/Secondary Access onto Hazelton Road (unsignalized) ➢ Byerly's new Main Access onto Hazelton Road (proposed as signalized) ➢ New Access onto France Avenue (proposed right- in/right -out) RLK Incorporated Page 2 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M hi C. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1. Existing Traffic Statistics To address the impacts of a development on the surrounding roadway system, it is necessary to first understand the existing traffic conditions prior to the area's redevelopment. The site exists today with a Byerly's grocery store encompassing 59,359 square feet. In addition, there are 448 parking stalls serving the grocery store. PM peak hour and Saturday Midday peak hour turning movement counts were conducted during November 3 and 7, 2012. The two peak times analyzed — P.M. Peak Hour and Saturday Midday Peak Hour — correspond to the heaviest commercial traffic in the area. Figure 3 shows an aerial photograph of the existing intersections and driveways serving the Byerly's site. Figure 4 shows the average daily traffic along the routes within the study area. Figure 5 shows the peak hour turning movements at the major intersections within the study area. AM peak hour counts were previously conducted by Hennepin County at several nearby intersections along France Avenue. The AM peak hour counts were found to be 20% to 25% lower than the PM peak or Saturday peak counts. Therefore, only the PM and Saturday peak hours were analyzed with this study. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. According to recent traffic studies conducted for the City of Edina, it has been found that France Avenue traffic has decreased. In 2009, two -way traffic counts on France Avenue varied from 26,000 vehicles /day to 28,500 vehicles per day. In 2011, it was found that France Avenue daily traffic volumes have decreased to a range between 24,300 vehicles per day to 27,800 vehicles per day.' 2. Existing Roadway Geometrics Vehicular access to the site from the development area is expected to occur primarily on two roadways: France Avenue and Hazelton Road. The following text details the specifics of each of these roadways: • France Avenue S. (County State Aid Highway 17) is functionally classified as an A -Minor Arterial- Reliever route. It exists as a six -lane divided roadway with separated left and right turn lanes in an urban cross section which travels primarily north/south through the City of Edina. In the area of the proposed site, France Avenue has a posted speed limit of 40 mph. Average daily traffic (ADT) just south of Gallagher Drive is 28,000 veh/day, as measured in 20112. • Hazelton Road is functionally classified as a collector. It is a four -lane undivided roadway with an urban cross section which travels east/west. Hazelton Road, also classified as Municipal State ' PowerPoint presentation from France Avenue TE S.P. 120 - 020 -037 Intersection Enhancements Stakeholders Meeting #1, May 31, 2012. 2 2011 Publication Traffic Volumes Metro Street Series — 4D, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Transportation Data and Analysis, Traffic Volume Program, http: / /www. dot. state .mn.us /traffic /data/index.htm] RLK Incorporated Page 3 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M AG2- Aid System Route 166, has a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Hazelton has an ADT of 7,600 veh/day just east of the proposed site, as measured in 2009. • York Avenue S. (County State Aid Highway 31) is functionally classified as a Major Collector, and is a four -lane divided County roadway with and urban cross section and 35 mph speeds. ADT on York Avenue south of Hazelton is 15,000 veh/day, as measured in 2011. The following summary lists the numbers of lanes and types of traffic control at intersections, as well as posted speeds, no parking zones in the area: France Avenue at Hazelton Road - Traffic Signal control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 40 mph on France; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. • SB France Ave approaching Hazelton — one shared through/right, two through, one left; • NB France Ave approaching Hazelton — one free right, three through, one left; • EB Hazelton approaching France Ave — one shared left/through/right lane; • WB Hazelton approaching France Ave — one free right, one through, one left. Hazelton Road at westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. • SB Development Driveway (Rue de France) approaching Hazelton Road — one shared right/through/left lane; • NB Byerly's westerly driveway approaching Hazelton Road — one right lane, one shared through/lane; o WB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one shared through/left lane; o EB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one shared through/left lane Hazelton Road at easterly Byerly's Site Entrance — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. • SB Development Driveway (Rue De France) approaching Hazelton Road — one shared right/through/left lane; • NB Byerly's westerly driveway approaching Hazelton Road —one shared right/through/left lane (widened for truck movements); • WB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one shared through/left lane; • EB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one shared through/left lane • York Avenue at Hazelton Road — Traffic Signal control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 35 mph on York; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. o SB York Ave approaching Hazelton — one right, two through, one left lane; o NB York Ave approaching Hazelton — one left, one through, one shared through/right; o EB Hazelton approaching York Ave — one left/through, one right; RLK Incorporated Page 4 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M ��3 o WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one shared left/through/right lane. France Avenue at 72nd Street — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 40 mph on France; Speed Limit 30 mph on 72 ❑d Street. • SB France Ave approaching 72nd St — one through/right, two through; • NB France Ave approaching 72nd St — three through lanes; • EB 72nd St approaching France Ave — one shared left/through/right lane. France Avenue at Gallagher Drive — Traffic Signal control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 40 mph on France; Speed Limit 30 mph on Gallagher. • EB Gallagher Drive approaching France Avenue — one through/right, one left; • WB Gallagher Drive approaching France Avenue — one through/right, one left; • SB France Avenue approaching Gallagher Drive — one shared through/right, two through, one left lane o NB France Avenue approaching Gallagher Drive — one shared through/right, two through, one left lane Sidewalks are currently provided on one side of France Avenue in this study area. A six -foot wide sidewalk exists adjacent to the curb along the west side of France Avenue between 66th Street to 76th Street. On the east side of France, there is no sidewalk between Hazelton Road and Gallagher Drive. There are six-foot sidewalks along the north and south sides of Hazelton Road from France Avenue to York Avenue. Metro Transit bus routes 6 and 587 currently serve this area. Bus stops are currently located along the both sides of France Avenue at Hazelton and at 72nd Street, as well as one located on the west side of France at Gallagher Drive. Along Hazelton, there are bus stops located on the north and south side of the street just west of the Target Store and just east of the Edina Promenade. Existing rights -of -way vary within the study area. From Hazelton Road south to 72nd Street, the half - street right -of -way narrows from 75 to 63 feet (for the right turn lane). The westerly half -street right -of- way of France Avenue in this segment is 50 feet. On Hazelton Road, the half -street right -of -way on the south half of the street is 36 feet, while the north half street right -of -way varies from 36 to 44 feet (again for the right turn lane). 3. Operational Analysis Methodology Operational analyses were conducted at the study intersections per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), which reports a level of service based on the delay experienced by vehicles at a particular intersection. The level of service concept indicates a measure of average operating conditions at intersections during an hour. Service levels range from A through F with each level defined by a range of control delay per vehicle. Table 1 lists the level of service criteria used to determine acceptable traffic operation. Traffic operations for peak hour conditions within the study area were analyzed using the industry- standard Synchro /SimTraffic software package, which uses the data and methodology contained in the RLK Incorporated Page 5 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 46$ HCM, published by the Transportation Research Board. The software model was calibrated using existing conditions before being used to assess future conditions. The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as traffic signals and stop - controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volumes on that facility. Various factors affect capacity, including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number and width of travel lanes, and intersection control. The current standards for evaluating capacity and operating conditions are contained in the HCM. The procedures describe operating conditions in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Facilities are given letter designations from "A," representing the best operating conditions, to "F," representing the worst. Generally, Level of Service "D" represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour. Table 1. LOS Criteria LOS Control Delay (secNeh) LOS Control Delay (sec/Veh) A 510 A 0-10 B >10 -20 B >10 -15 C >20 -35 C >15 -25 D >35 -55 D >25 -35 E >55 -80 E >35 -50 F > 80 F >50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000' The acceptable threshold for a particular movement at an intersection depends on both the priority assigned to that movement and its traffic volume. In general, the higher the priority and the higher the traffic volume, the more stringent the acceptable threshold will be. For example, the acceptable threshold for a high - priority/high- volume suburban movement might be "D," while LOS "F" on a low-priorityAow- volume urban movement might be appropriate. For side -street stop - controlled intersections, a key measure of operational effectiveness is the side -street LOS. Long delays and poor LOS can sometimes result on the side street, even if the overall intersection is functioning well, making it a valuable design criterion. Again, depending on priority and traffic volume, acceptable side -street LOS can range from "D" to "F." A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, or the lineup of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable level of service, but if queues from the intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. The 95th percentile queue, or the length of queue with a 5% chance of occurring during the peak hour, is considered the standard for design purposes. For the purposes of this analysis, however, LOS "D" or "E" or better is considered acceptable for low - volume movements at certain intersections. For this analysis, the industry - standard Synchro and SimTraffic software packages were used to analyze intersection operation. All operational and queue reports are found in the Appendices of this report. s Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.0 RLK Incorporated Page 6 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M A �.� J 4. Existing Trip Generation Based on the trip generation rates found in•the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual, 9`h Edition, this supermarket.will generatejust over 6,000 vehicular trips each weekday and more than 10,500 trips on a Saturday (See Table 2): x, Table 2. Trip.Generad6n Estimates'' — Eadsting- Byerly's Site Land Use Size Weekday PM' Daily Saturday AM a Saturday Daily Enter Exit Enter- Exit Supermarket 59;359 s ft. 258 239 6,069 322 310 107542 Total Existing Trips 258497 239 6,069 322. .310 10,542 24 632 30 1. Per the data and methodologies to 1np generation, Y— rwtton, puousnea oy tt n. Table 3, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current .lane geometry, traffic control and traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operating at an overall LOS. D or better during both the weekday PM and. Saturday peak hours with most movements operating at LOS .E or, better. The northbound left turn from the westerly Byerly's intersection has significant delay in the Saturday midday period, while the eastbound lgft turn from the unsignalized intersection of 72nd to northbound France Avenue shows significant delay during both study periods (despite minimal volumes). Full reports showing detailed LOS and delays by approach are included in the Appendix. Table 3 - Existing Level of Service Intersection PM, Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS 'Int. Delay (sec /veh) LOS Int. Delay (Sec /veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. B (D) 18 C (D) 22 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (e) 7 a (f) 22 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive a (c) 1 a (c) 1 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (D) 24 C (D) . 30 France Ave. & 72° St. a (f) 2 a a (f) 1 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (C) 20 B (D) '16 NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LOS at signahzea intersections; Lower case terser reuect wa ac unsignanzea mtersecuon. b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LAS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily, worst movement delay. RLK Incorporated Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis Page 7 of 39 January 1,6; 2013 2012 -135 -M 5. Existing Queue Lengths RLK conducted a study of the existing traffic conditions for P.M. Peak Hour and Saturday Midday traffic conditions. A queuing analysis was conducted for the main intersections /driveways for the P.M. Peak Hour. Traffic engineers use a measure called 95"' percentile queue. The measurement defines the queue length (in feet) that has only a 5- percent probability of being exceeded during the analysis time period. If the 95`'' percentile queue length approaches or exceeds the segment length, mediation may be required. Results are shown in Tables 4a and 4b: Table 4a. Selected 95"' Percentile Queue Lengths'— Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — Existing Byerly's Site Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95`h Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 162 Northbound Through France at Hazelton 402 420 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Drivewa 256 43 Northbound Byerly's Driveway at Hazelton 500 110 Table 4b. Selected 95"' Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — Existing Byerly's Site Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95`h Percentile Queue Len (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 196 Northbound Through France at Hazelton 402 302 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Drivewa 256 74 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 500 154 Westbound Hazelton approach has available capacity. Northbound France Avenue has a queue length that at times extends back through the 72°d Street intersection during the p.m. peak hour. Other critical movements have available capacity at intersections. RLK Incorporated Page 8 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M /: 9 D. FUTURE PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT In the testing of the future projected traffic conditions without the development (i.e., the "No- Build" condition), an annual growth rate of 1% was assumed for background traffic. Under this scenario, it is assumed that the Byerly's site remains as -is. Therefore, traffic volumes are projected to be constant for traffic entering and exiting the Byerly's site. The Byerly's France Avenue Redevelopment project has a completion date for the final phase in 2014. Therefore, the typical date for traffic analysis is one year after completion, so as to assess the traffic once the pattern for drivers has sufficiently developed in the area. To accurately assess traffic conditions with or without the development, traffic conditions will be assessed for the year 2015 without the development, but with the normal background growth on the street system. 1. Changes in Road Network The City of Edina was successful in securing Federal Transportation Enhancement funding for the construction of Pedestrian / Intersection Enhancements along France Avenue (CSAH 17) at 76ffi Street, 70`h Street and 66t' Street. While not finalized, the recommended improvements include: • Reducing the vehicle lanes to the minimum State Aid requirements on northbound France Avenue the entire length from 76th Street to 66th Street and on southbound France Avenue and the side streets only through the intersections at 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Removing and relocation of the France Avenue northbound outside curb from 76th Street to 66th Street and southbound outside curb at the intersections of 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Removing free right turn islands in all quadrants at 76th Street, in the southeast quadrant at 70th Street, in the southeast quadrant at 69th Street, in the southeast quadrant of the Southdale entrance, in the northeast quadrant of the Southdale exit an in the southeast, southwest and northeast quadrants at 66th Street. • Widening the center median on France Avenue and the side streets to a 10 foot width only at the intersections of 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Providing an 8 foot landscaped boulevard on the eastside of France Avenue from 76th Street to 66th Street. • Providing an 8 foot sidewalk on the eastside of France Avenue from 76th Street to 66th Street and on the west side of France Avenue only at the intersections of 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. RLK Incorporated Page 9 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 9u u • Providing a minimum 6 foot landscaped boulevard on the side streets at 66th Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Providing a 6 foot sidewalk on the side streets where sidewalks currently exist at 66`h Street, 70th Street and 76th Street. • Either a 5 foot on -street bike lane or a shared lane with "Sharrow" eastbound and westbound on 66`h Street, 70th Street and 76`h Street through France Avenue. • ADA compliant Redestrian ramps at all intersections and driveways on the eastside of France Avenue from 76 Street to 66`h Street and on the west side of France Avenue at 66th Street, 70`h Street and 76`s Street. • Revised traffic signal systems at 66`h Street, 70`h Street and 76`h Street including APS pedestrian push buttons, countdown pedestrian signal timers, median refuge island pedestrian push buttons and new vehicle and bicycle detection systems. • Urban design feature including, landscaping, monuments, planter boxes, bollards and colored or stamped concrete at the intersection of 66`s Street, 70`h Street and 76`s Street. Where applicable, these enhancements have been incorporated into the proposed future -year conditions and models for France Avenue ( -- both No -Build and Build scenarios). 2. Background Development Traffic Growth Despite recent decreases in traffic volumes, future traffic growth must be assumed. This background growth must be included in future year traffic forecasts. In order to account for some background growth in traffic, a traffic growth projection factor of 1.0 was used to project traffic to the 2015 and 2016 study years. In addition to the regional background traffic, other specific none development related traffic was determined and included with the overall background traffic. Southdale Residential Apartment Development - Based on information received from WSB & Associates, Inc., a 232 -unit 10 -story apartment development is proposed for the southeast corner of the Southdale Center property. The apartment building would be constructed in the northwest comer of the intersection of York Street and 69`h Street. The analysis assumes that all units will be occupied by 2015 and that the background trip generation will be included in the background of the 2015 and 2016 analysis. Future Southdale Restaurant Development — The analysis of the Southdale Residential Development included the analysis of a future restaurant that is proposed in northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 69th Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 s.f. in size with approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will be developed by 2014 and that the background trip generation for the restaurant will be the same for the 2015 and 2016 analysis scenarios. RLK Incorporated Page 10 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Aq I.. Centennial Lakes Coffee Shon -- Based on information received from WSB & Associates, Inc., a free - standing 1,750 square foot coffee shop building is proposed in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of France Avenue and Plaza Drive. The site has other potential uses (fast food restaurant, bank, pharmacy, specialty retail, etc.), but the primary analysis of the site assumed a coffee shop. The analysis assumes that all units will be occupied by 2015 and that the background trip generation will be included in the background of the 2015 and 2016 analysis. Proposed Restaurant/Retail Site — A proposed restaurant or retail site is being proposed for the site of the former Szechuan Star restaurant to the east side of the Byerly's redevelopment property site. This site will be added to the long -term background traffic impacts. In each case, RLK looked at the traffic studies prepared for each development and compared the added trips to the background traffic for each study scenario. In the short-term build alternates of the Southdale Residential Project, the 2014 Build Alternate 1 traffic on northbound France Avenue was 53 fewer trips in the P.M. Peak Hour than in the 2014 No -Build scenario for the project. a The 2014 Build Alternate generated 20 more trips on northbound York Avenue for the Saturday Midday peak hour than in the 2014 No -build scenario for the project. In the Centennial Lakes Plaza Coffee Shop Traffic Study, 21 trips were added to northbound and southbound lanes of France Avenue north of Plaza Drive in the P.M. Peak Hour.5 Similarly, 32 trips were added to northbound France Avenue in the Saturday Midday Peak Hour, and 30 trip were added to the southbound approach on France Avenue at Plaza Drive. In each development case, the associated trips were added (or subtracted, as the case may be) to either France Avenue or York Avenue through movements in the Byerly's redevelopment analysis to represent these changes to the background developments. 3. No -Build Trip Distribution If the No -Build scenario were to occur, all site traffic will continue to enter from and exit onto Hazelton Road at the two access driveways. The westerly driveway will continue to be the primary driveway serving the site, while the easterly driveway will continue as the delivery driveway. It is assumed that the existing trip distribution pattern will remain. Site - generated trips will be unchanged from the existing trip distribution patterns. 4 Southdale Residential Traffic and Parking Study, prepared for the City of Edina by WSB & Associates, 09/04/12. 5 Centennial Lakes Coffee Shov Traffic Study, prepared for the City of Edina by WSB & Associates, 06/18/12. RLK Incorporated Page 11 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 470 4. Projected No -Build Traffic Volumes To accurately project No -Build traffic volumes in the study area, it is assumed the existing Byerly's traffic volumes will not change while the background traffic will increase by the annual growth rate. To model this scenario, the trip generation for the existing grocery store was calculated and stripped from the existing traffic pattern based on percentages at each intersection. The remaining traffic is considered the Background Traffic. The Background Traffic volumes were then increased by the overall growth rate (1% annually) and the additional development background trips (described above) were added. Finally, the existing grocery trips were added back.in to reflect the No -Build scenario. Figure 5 shows the 2015 No -Build turning movement volumes for the PM Peak Hour and for the Saturday Midday Peak Hour. 5. 2015 No -Build Traffic Operations Traffic operations were tested for the 2015 No -Build Scenario assuming the roadway enhancements along France Avenue have been implemented. In addition, the following geometric improvements are assumed along Hazelton: France Avenue at Hazelton Road - Traffic Signal control; On- Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 40 mph on France; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. o SB France Ave approaching Hazelton — one shared through/right, two through, one left; o NB France Ave approaching Hazelton — one free right, three through, one left; o EB Hazelton approaching France Ave — one shared left/through/right lane; o WB Hazelton approaching France Ave — one free right, one through, one left. Hazelton Road at westerly Bay's Site Entrance — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. (Note: Modification to 3/ access not assumed under No -Build scenario.) • SB Development Driveway (Rue de France) approaching Hazelton Road — one shared right/through/left lane; • NB Byerly's westerly driveway approaching Hazelton Road — one right lane, one shared through/lane; • WB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one left lane; • EB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, one left lane serving as the.west end of the Two -Way Left Turn Lane (TWLTL). Hazelton Road at easterly Byerly's Site Entrance — Side Street Stop Sign control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. o SB Development Driveway (Rue De France) approaching Hazelton Road — one shared right/through/left lane; `r RLK Incorporated Page 12 of 39 January 16, 2U 13 Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M �`7 I • NB Byerly's westerly driveway approaching Hazelton Road —one shared right/through/left lane (widened for truck movements); • WB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, left turn opportunity in the TWLTL; • EB Hazelton Road approaching westerly Byerly's Site Entrance — one shared through/right lane, left turn opportunity in the TWLTL York Avenue at Hazelton Road — Traffic Signal control; On -Street Parking prohibited; Speed Limit 35 mph on York; Speed Limit 30 mph on Hazelton. • SB York Ave approaching Hazelton — one right, two through, one left lane; • NB York Ave approaching Hazelton — one left, one through, one shared through/right; • EB Hazelton approaching York Ave — (Note: TWLTL assumed to end prior to York Avenue) one left/through, one right; • WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one shared left/through/right lane. The levels of service for the study intersections are shown on Table 5. Table 5. Projected Levels of Service — 2015 No -Build Condition (Assumes France Avenue Enhancements) Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay (seclveh ) LOS Int. Delay (Seclveh France Ave & Hazelton Rd. B (F -SBLt) 17.7 C (F -SBLt) 33.3 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (d) 5.4 b (f- NBLt)) 53.9 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. a (c) 1.0 a (c) 1.7 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (F -NBLt) 31.6 C (F -NBLt) 31.4 France Ave. & 72° St. a (f -EB) 2.0 a (f) 1.5 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (F -SBLt) 19.4 B (F -SBLt) 18.6 NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LOS at signalized intersections; Lowercase letter reflect LOS at unsignalized intersection. b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LOS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. The associated 95th percentile queue lengths for the 2015 No -Build condition are listed on Tables 6a and 6b. RLK Incorporated Page 13 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Ala Table 6a. Selected 95a' Percentile Queue Lengths' — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 No -Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 951'' Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Tum Hazelton at France 256 139 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 419 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 99 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 125 Eastbound Left Hazelton at B erl 's Driveway 259 41 Northbound B erl 's Driveway at Hazelton 270 78 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 181 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 79 Southbound Left Tum France at Gallagher 230 171 Table 6b. Selected 95b Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2015 No -Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95"' Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Tum Hazelton at France 256 201 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 394 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 119 Westbound Ri ht France at Hazelton 150 114 Eastbound Left Hazelton at B erl 's Driveway 259 46 Northbound B erly's Driveway at Hazelton 270 156 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 185 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 105 Southbound Left Tum France at Gallagher 230 268 RLK Incorporated Page 14 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M l[`? 5 F. FUTURE PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH DEVELOPMENT 1. Proposed Development Phases There are several phases proposed for the Byerly's Redevelopment Project: A. Construction of a new 52,500 square -foot grocery store — completed by mid- August 2014; B. Construction of a new 109 -unit mid -rise apartment building — completed by mid- November 2014; C. Construction of a new 77 -unit mid -rise apartment building with 10,450 square feet of retail space on the ground floor — completed by mid- to late -2015. D. Construction of a new 48 -unit mid -rise apartment building with 10,500 square feet of retail space on the ground floor — completed by mid- to late -2015. The staging of these phases is such as to allow the existing grocery store to remain open until the new store is completed, then the old store will close and the remaining apartment and retail will be constructed. Therefore, two Build scenarios are to be tested: 0 2015 Build — incorporating the new grocery store and the 109 -unit mid -rise apartment building; e 2016 Build — incorporating the 2015 Build land uses with the two remaining mid -rise apartments and ground floor retail. 2. Proposed Directional Distribution Because of the proposed site layout; access to the various buildings will be possible from more than one driveway. In addition, some of these driveways will be full access while others will have limited access. Generally, trips to and from most access points were distributed 80/20 with the closer access getting the majority of, the entering /exiting traffic. Exiting traffic intending to head northbound on France from the grocery or from the apartments was split 50/50 between the new RI/RO access onto France and the Hazelton signal. Some traffic headed southbound is split between the Hazelton easterly intersection or down to Gallagher intersection. The following diagrams illustrate the directional distribution of ingress and egress traffic into and out of each land use of the redevelopment project: RLK Incorporated Page 15 of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis Pf January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M Grocery Store Traffic: a 3% Hazelton 27 %q> 14,17% a 25% 1 %11 If 25 % e13% 4%a 8 %0 8%a 25%P 8 %* R25% 1%4 12 %p 26%�P X12 31 %% 8%% 72nd 17 %a i 4 20%1 17 %,1l 1% 20% I 8%4 35%6' France I *.5% 02°% 13 %11 2 %�> Fr 17 % Gallagher s %_- 30 %4 Proposed Housing A (109 Units): Directional Distribution -Proposed Grocery Store 35%6' Inbound Trip Percentage & Direction ,L- 20% outbound Trip Percentage & Direction -* General Location of Trip Generator York 5% a 3% Hazelton 47 1O , f17% a 25% 1 % 11 �2s% X13 °� 4%a 2%6:, 2 %a 34 %* A25% 1 % 4 3 %d� 26%x, q12% 31 %% 2%% 11 %�, 17%s 72 nd St. 2%4 20 %u York I 1 MD R. 20% I 2%4 41 %0 France %5% ,z2% 13%11 2 %t� L: Gallagher s %,p I F32-7. Directional Distribution - Proposed Housing A (109Unfts) 35%,P Inbound Trip Percentage & Direction X20% outbound Trip Percentage &Direction * General Location of Trip Generator RLK Incorporated Page 16 of 39 Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 471r)-- January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M Proposed Housing B (77 Units & 10,450 sq. ft. Retail): %5% a 3% Hazelton 27 vv, 617% a25% 1%b 625% $13% 4 %a 2 %e 2 %* 34 % 34 %0 X25% 1 %ti 3 %4 26%-,. :h12% 31%% 2 %% 11 % �• 17 %fs 72' St. 2 %4 20 %o York I 17 %n 20 2 %ft 41 %0 Directional Distribution - Proposed Housing B (77 Units & Retail) France 35%e Inbound Trip Percentage &Direction %6% 20% Outbound Trip Percentage & Direction ;;2% 13%C• 2 %F. 617 % General Location of Trip Generator Gallagher 5 %& 1 32%4 Proposed Housing C (48 Unites & 10,500 sq. ft. Retail): %5% a 3% Hazelton 27 %F, 617% a 25% 1 % 4,25% $13 4%c 12%dD 1 %a 36 %Q= 36 %a Q25% 11%4 1 %a 26% 7p Q12% 42 %% 1 %1* 11%-- 72 nl St 17 %4 20 %G C- 20% 12 %Q 31 %cp France %6% c2% 113%J5 2 %1> 617 Gallagher 5 %.1 1 3z %4 York Directional Distribution - Proposed Housing C (48 Units & Retail) 35%& Inbound Trip Percentage & Direction 20% Outbound Trip Percentage & Direction General Location of Trip Generator RLK Incorporated Page 17 of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis A 7G January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M 3. Proposed Build Trip Generations Tables 7 and 8 show the proposed trip generation estimates for each phase of the development — the 2015 Build (encompassing the new Byerly's store and Housing A), and the 2016 Build (which adds the trip generation of Housing B and C to the trip generation from the 2015 Build analysis). Each is based on the trip generation rates found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual, 9`h Edition. It should be noted that each scenario is adjusted to reflect shared trips and pass -by trips. According the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, "Pass -by trips are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without a route diversion." Further, "Pass -by trips are only applicable to trips that enter or exit the site, not internal trips. "6 According to Table 5.10 of the Handbook, the average pass -by trips percentage for supermarkets is 36 %, which was used in this study. The ITE Trip Generation Manual also outlines a procedure for calculating internal capture rates for trip origins within a multi -use development (aka, "Shared Trips "). The total Shared Trip assumption for this study was 20 %. Table 7. 2015 Build - Trip Generation Estimates" — Proposed Site Land Use Size Weekday PM Daily Saturday Midda y Saturday Daily Enter Exit Enter E3dt Supermarket 52,500 s ft 254 244 5,368 285 274 9,323. Apartments (Building A) 109 Units 44 24 725 28 28 697 Total - Gross 298 268 6,093 313 '302 8,626 566 615 Shared Trips 56 56 1,211 85 82 2,710 112 167 Pass -By Trips '72 72 0 0 144 0 Total Proposed Trips 170 4,882 228 220 5,916 310140 448 2. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation, 9' Edition, published by ITE. 6 Trip Generation Manual 9h Edition; Volume 1: User's Guide and Handbook, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, 2012. RLK Incorporated Page 18 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 77 Table 8. 2016 Build - Trip Generation Estimates'' — Proposed Site Land Use Size Weekday PM Daily Saturday Midday Saturday Daily Enter Exit Enter Exit Supermarket 52,500 s . ft. 254 244 5,368 285 274 9,323 Apartments (Building A) 109 Units 44 24 725 28 28 697 Apartment (Buildin B) r77 s 31 17 512 20 20 492 Specialty Retail so ft 19 20 449 26 26 522 Apartment (Building C) 48 Units 19 10 319 12 12 307 Specialty Retail sq. 0' ft 19 20 451 26 26 525 Total - Gross 386 335 7,824 397 386 11,866 721 783 Shared Trips 73 73 1,576 105 102 3,134 146 207 Pass -By Trips 82 1 82 10 T 10 164 20 —2827-274 Total Proposed Trips 231 1 180 6,248 8,732 411 556 3. Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation. 9' Edition, published by ITE. 4. Projected Traffic Operations — 2015 Build Table 9 summarizes the projected levels of service for the 2015 Build Condition. This reflects the traffic operation of the new Byerly's Grocery Store and the first building of apartment units (aka, "Housing A "). This analysis assumes the intersection enhancements along France Avenue. In addition, this analysis assumes that Hazelton has been reconfigured from a four -lane roadway (two lanes in each direction) to a three -lane roadway (one lane in each direction with a center Two -Way Left Turn Lane — a "TWLTI: ). Further, the westerly driveway intersection along Hazelton between the Byerly's redevelopment site and Rue de France shopping center has been configured into a three- quarter access — that is, eastbound Hazelton traffic can make left turns, make right toms or proceed straight, while westbound traffic can only turn right or proceed straight. No movement can make a left turn except the eastbound movement. That means that from the Byerly's property, northbound movements can only turn right (eastbound) at Hazelton. Full access is possible from the Byerly's property easterly intersection with Hazelton. This intersection has been tested with either signalized or unsignalized operation. Both resulting levels of service are shown in the table below. Both operate acceptably. RLK Incorporated Page 19 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 7� Table 9. Projected Levels of Service — 2015 Build Condition Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay (sec/veh) LOS Int. Delay (Sec/veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. B (F -SBLt) 17.3 C (F -SBLt) 31.4 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (b) 2.1 b (b) 2.4 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) B (B) 11.3 B (B) 11.6 a (c) 2.1 a (c) 3.2 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (F -NBLt) 28.8 C (F -NBLt) 31.5 France Ave. & 72 nd St. a (f -EB) 1.8 a (f -'FR) 2 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. C (F -SBLt) 18.0 C (F -SBLt) 20.4 France Ave. & Byerly's Driveway a (a) I n/a a (a) n/a NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LOS at signalized intersections; Lowercase letter reflect LUS at unsignalizetl intersection. b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LOS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. Queue lengths for the 2015 Build conditions are listed on Tables 10a and 10b. Table 10a. Selected 95`" Percentile Queue Lengths' — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95h Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 162 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 434 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 147 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 90 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Drivewa 259 45 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 43 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 182 L--Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 71 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 196 Table 10b. Selected 951h Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2015 Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 951h Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 180 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 478 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 44 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 73 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Driveway 259 55 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 37 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 186 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 90 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 318 RLK Incorporated Page 20 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M k7y 5. Projected Traffic Operations — 2016 Build Table 11 summarizes the projected levels of service for the 2016 Build Condition. This reflects the traffic operation of the 2015 Build conditions combined with the two additional apartment buildings (aka, "Housing B and C ").and ground floor retail uses. (NOTE: This level of analysis did not include the proposed restaurant use to the east of the Byerly's redevelopment site.) This analysis assumes the same intersection enhancements along France Avenue, as well as the geometric and traffic control changes along Hazelton described under 2015 Build. Full access is again possible from the Byerly's property easterly intersection with Hazelton. This intersection has been tested with either signalized or unsignalized operation. Both resulting levels of service are shown in the table below. Both continue to operate acceptably. Table 11. Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition (Without Impact of Parcel to the East) Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay (sec /veh) LOS Int. Delay (Sec /veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. C (F -SBLt) 20.9 D (F -SBLt) 36.4 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (b) 2.2 b (b) 2.5 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) B (B) 13.0 B (C) 13.3 a (c) 2.5 a (d) 3.6 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (F -NBLt) 32.4 C (F -NBLt) 33.3 France Ave. & 72° d St. a (c) 0.5 a (d) 0.6 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (F -SBLt) 19.2 B (F -SBLt) 18.3 France Ave. & Byerly's Driveway a (a) n/a a (a) n/a NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LAS at signalized intersections; Lower case letter reflect LADS at unsignalized intersection b. First letter reflects Intersection LAS; letter inside parentheses reflects LAS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. Table 12a. Selected 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths' — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95th Percentile Queue Len h (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 136 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 480 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 67 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 100 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Drivewa 259 41 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 41 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 176 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 93 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 1 146 RLK Incorporated Page 21 of 39 January 16, 2U 13 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M � � . Table 12b. Selected 95'b Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions Segm ent Segment Length (ft.) 95` Percentile Queue Len (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 177 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 440 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 89 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 92 Eastbound Left Hazelton at Byerly's Drivewa 259 91 Northbound Byerly's Drivewa at Hazelton 270 49 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 187 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 124 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 176 6. Projected Traffic Operations — 2016 Build with Restaurant Development to the East Table 13 illustrates the trip generation added by the restaurant development to the east of the Byerly's Redevelopment. Applying these trip estimates, Table 14 summarizes the projected levels of service for the 2016 Build Condition assuming an outside developer were to develop the former Szechuan Star into another restaurant. Traffic operation of the 2016 Build conditions have been combined with the impacts of a possible 8,000 square foot quality sit -down restaurant that may be in operation at or after the completion of the 2016 Build scenario. This analysis assumes the same intersection enhancements along France Avenue, as well as the geometric and traffic control changes along Hazelton described under 2015 Build. Full access is again possible from the Byerly's property easterly intersection with Hazelton. This intersection has been tested with either signalized or unsignalized operation. Both resulting levels of service are shown in the table below. Both continue to operate acceptably. RLK Incorporated Page 22 of 39 January 16, 2U 13 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M Mm Table 13. 2016 Build with Impacts to the East - Trip Generation Estimates" — Proposed Site Land Use Size Weekday PM Daily Saturday Midday Saturday Daily Enter Exit Enter EAt Supermarket 52,500 s 254 244 5,368 285 274 9,323 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) B (B) 13.0 B (C) 13.4 a (c) 2.7 a (d) Apartments (Building A) 109 Units C (F -NBLt) 24 725 28 28 697 0.5 a (d) 0.7 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (F -SBLt) 19.3 B (F -SBLt) 18.7 Apartment (Building B) 77 Units 31 17 512 20 20 492 Specialty Retail 10,450 s . ft. 19 20 449 26 26 522 Apartment (Building C) 48 Units 19 10 319 12 12 307 Specialty Retail 10,500 19 20 451 26 26 525 Quality Restaurant 81000 s . ft. 40 20 720 51 35 755 Total - Gross 426 354 8,544 448 421 11,621 780 869 Shared Trips 77 77 1,676 119 112 3,350 154 231 Pass -By Trips 93 1 93 10 1 10 186 20 Total Proposed Trips 231 1 180 6,868 319 299 9,271 411 618 Per the data and methodologies in Trio Generation, 9 Edition, published by ITE. Table 14. Projected Levels of Service — 2016 Build Condition (With Impact of Parcel to the East) Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Int. Delay (sec/veh) LOS Int. Delay (Sec /veh) France Ave & Hazelton Rd. C (F -SBLt) 21.9 D (F -SBLt) 39.6 Hazelton Rd. & Westerly Byerly's Drive a (b) 2.2 b (b) 2.7 Hazelton Rd. & Easterly Byerly's Drive (Signalized or unsignalized) B (B) 13.0 B (C) 13.4 a (c) 2.7 a (d) 4.4 Hazelton Rd. & York Ave. C (F -NBLt) 33.0 C (F -NBLt) 34.5 France Ave. & 72 nd St. a (c) 0.5 a (d) 0.7 France Ave. & Gallagher Dr. B (F -SBLt) 19.3 B (F -SBLt) 18.7 France Ave. & Byerly's Driveway a (a) n/a a (a) n/a NOTES: a. Upper Case letters reflect LAS at signalized intersections; Lower case letter reflect LOS at unsignatizea b. First letter reflects Intersection LOS; letter inside parentheses reflects LAS of worst movement. c. Int. Delay reflects overall average intersection delay, not necessarily worst movement delay. RLK Incorporated Page 23 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M 0 a Queuing is also assessed for this condition, and is listed in Tables 15a and 15b. Table 15a. Selected 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths' — Weekday P.M. Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions w /restaurant Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 175 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 381 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 84 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 69 Eastbound Left Hazelton at B erl 's Driveway 259 68 Northbound B erl 's Driveway at Hazelton 270 54 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 185 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 90 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher t 230 161 Table 15b. Selected 95 "' Percentile Queue Lengths' — Saturday Midday Peak Hour — 2016 Build Conditions w /restaurant Segment Segment Length (ft.) 95`' Percentile Queue Length (ft.) Westbound Left Turn Hazelton at France 256 93 Southbound Left France at Hazelton 360 442 Northbound Right France at Hazelton 315 90 Westbound Right France at Hazelton 150 93 Eastbound Left Hazelton at B erl 's Driveway 259 78 Northbound B er] 's Driveway at Hazelton 270 58 Northbound Left York at Hazelton 160 185 Westbound Left Turn Gallagher at France 120 119 Southbound Left Turn France at Gallagher 230 230 RLK Incorporated Page 24 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M m i G. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS As part of the Edina Redevelopment Project, consideration has been given whether the easterly driveway intersection at Hazelton will be warranted for signalization as a result of this project. RLK has used the following methodology to assess the likelihood of signalization at the intersection. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has prepared a document "Metro Traffic Signal Justification Report Methodology ", to assist in determining whether an intersection is justified for signalization.' The document outlines the current methodology in determining whether criteria are met for a signal to be considered justified at a particular intersection. For a specific intersection to be considered for a traffic signal installation one of the following criteria must be met: 1. The intersection meets Warrant IA, 1B or 7 of the current MN MLTTCD. 2. Current traffic volumes do not meet Warrant IA or 1B, but development in the area will occur such that the warrants will be met in a reasonable period of time and state funds are not used for construction. 4. Current traffic volumes do not meet Warrant IA or 1B, but a significant crash problem exists (an average of at least three correctable crashes per year (any 12 -month period) over the most recent 3 -year period) and traffic volumes are likely to meet warrants within a reasonable period. 5. The intersection has significant amounts of pedestrian traffic, which can be documented. A summary of the analysis of Warrants IA and 1B are as follows: Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach: • For Major Street = 2 (left turn lane is shared), Vehicles per hour on major street (total of both approaches) must be > 600 for Condition A, 900 for Condition B • For Minor Street = 2 (left lane + shared through/right lane), Vehicle per hour on higher- volume minor street approach (one direction only) must be > 200 for Condition A, 100 for Condition B For Condition A, the 2016 Build (with restaurant) Major Street approach = 679 trips per hour in PM Peak Hour; and 911 trips per hour in Saturday Midday Peak Hour. The Minor Street approach traffic = 64 trips 7 "Metro Traffic Signal Justification Report Methodology ", as part of Minnesota Department of Transportation Engineering Services Technical Memorandum No. 07- 02 -T -01, Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), March 20, 2007. RLK Incorporated Page 25 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M ht per hour (one direction only) in PM Peak Hour; = 97 trips per hour in Saturday Midday Peak Hour. Warrant 1A is not met. For Condition B, the 2016 Build (with restaurant) conditions are not met for PM Peak Hour conditions, but are very close to being met for the Saturday Midday Peak Hour. The methodology also states that a combination of Conditions A and B may be used after adequate trial of other remedial measures is made. This allows for a reduction to levels that are 80% of the previous minimums for warrants to be made. Therefore: • For Major Street = 1 (left turn lane is shared), Vehicles per hour on major street (total of both approaches) must be > 480 for Condition A, 720 for Condition B • For Minor Street = 2 (left lane + shared through/right lane), Vehicle per hour on higher- volume minor street approach (one direction only) must be > 160 for Condition A, 80 for Condition B Under these 80% conditions, the Saturday Midday Peak Hour does not meet Condition A but does meet Condition B. The nearby pedestrian crossing of Hazelton at the Edina Promenade may be documented to provide additional justification to the signalization of this intersection. RLK Incorporated Page 26 of 39 January 16, 2013 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 2012 -135 -M MAw H. PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS The Byerly's redevelopment has proposed the following on -site parking for each parcel of development: Byerly's Store: 46,700 sq. ft. ground floor; therefore, at 5 stalls per 1000 sq. ft., = 235 stalls required; 236 stalls provided to south of store. Housing A and B: At 2.0 stalls /unit; 186 units x 2.0 stalls = 372 stalls, per code At 1.5 stalls/unit; 186 units x 1.5 stalls = 279 stalls Parking User Rate = 1 stall per bedroom (except 3 br) = 263 stalls 286 stalls provided in garage; 25 surface stalls = 311 stalls total Housing C: At 2.0 stalls /unit; 48 units x 2.0 stalls = 96 stalls, per code At 1.5 stalls /unit; 48 units x 1.5 stalls = 72 stalls Parking User Rate = 1 stall per bedroom (except 3 br) = 64 stalls 72 stalls provided in garage; 9 surface stalls = 81 stalls total Overall Parking Summary for Housing/Retail Buildings Parking at 2 stalls per unit 468 Parking at 1.5 stalls per unit 351 Parking User Rate 327 Garage Parking Provided 358 Surface Parking Provided 34 Total Provided 392 RLK Incorporated Page 27 of 39 Byedy's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 464 January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M I. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis documents in this study, RLK Incorporated has drawn the following conclusions and recommendations: • The three -lane configuration of Hazelton appears to work well in both scenarios. • The westerly Byerly's driveway operates well (LOS -A) as a right- inhight -out at Hazelton. At this point, the easterly driveway operates equally well as either a signalized or side street stop sign intersection (both LOS -A, with signal operating slightly better, especially for northbound movements). Left turn 95th percentile queues at the intersection are less than 100 feet in each approach. As a signal, the average control delay is 7.2 sec /veh. As an unsignalized intersection, the average delay is 4.1 sec /veh (due to free flow along Hazelton). Signal warrants may be met with further analysis outside the scope of this report. • The right- in/right -out onto France operates well, and does not interfere with northbound traffic or weaving traffic approaching the right turn lane at Hazelton. • The additional access points into and out of the development disperse the trips throughout the development, and thus reduce the overall traffic impacts onto the surrounding system. • There is a reduction in overall traffic on the westbound approach of Hazelton at France. This is due to the redistribution of trips resulting from the alternate access points (right- in/right -out at France; cross access to Gallagher via the Macy's Furniture Store access, etc.). Westbound 95th percentile queues on Hazelton at France Avenue extend to the east 183 feet (total length to westerly driveway is approx. 260 feet). • There are some queuing issues with the northbound left turn movement at York, the southbound left turn from France to eastbound Hazelton, and southbound France at Gallagher. These conditions seem to exist under the No -Build as well as the Build Conditions, and seem to attributable to other development in the area (especially Target and Yorktown Square impacts at the York intersection). • Off -street parking supply is met when considered at a 1.5 stall per unit or a parking user rate is considered. The mixed use development and availability of nearby transit may allow the parking supply to meet these lower rates. It is clear that the additional access points to and from the Byerly's redevelopment site greatly benefit the traffic operations despite there being more trips generated than in the current configuration. As a result, there are no queuing impacts directly associated with the redevelopment, even with the "roadway diet" from four lanes on Hazelton to three. While a signal is not explicitly warranted based on traffic volumes, a case can be made that signalizing the easterly Byerly's intersection will facilitate the pedestrian crossing at the Promenade to the east (subject to further engineering study). RLK Incorporated Page 28 of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis h7 January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M FIGURES Figure 1 Project Site Figure 2 Existing Geometrics Figure 3 Aerial Photo of Existing Conditions Figure 4 Existing Peak Hour Turning Movements Figure 5 2015 No -Build Peak Hour Turning Movements Figure 6 Proposed Geometrics Figure 7 2015 Build Peak Hour Turning Movements Figure 8 2016 Build Peak Hour Turning Movements Figure 9 2016 Build with Restaurant to the East Peak Hour Turning Movements RLK Incorporated Page 29 of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M 2006 RLK INC. HAMLMM RM Nwr 11.. FFBWW 2tMW =TI77� illillIF[TFI-HTI]IIIIIIIiIIIIII= ...... ........... 337.7 oil 7233 r-... A— B. EdIna, MN 55433 73.362 WL rFE-8W2:h 32" ............ = G.1.9h.. DM- EdInd, MN 55435 Mber Investment ftup LP h DdaftMN RLK rz Pon 95]933 'm 0 v ,1 6110 Blue Camin IM.0 Bubo 100 W—umak, hIN ssms m EDINA BYERLY'S .E' E E HWA MUM OF IFF&W1.9 PROJECT SITE PLAN Ail a 60 120 I SCALE IN FEET ngure Ip 1 Project f 2012135M �-fil I IBM � 2tMW =TI77� illillIF[TFI-HTI]IIIIIIIiIIIIII= ...... ........... 337.7 oil 7233 r-... A— B. EdIna, MN 55433 73.362 WL rFE-8W2:h 32" ............ = G.1.9h.. DM- EdInd, MN 55435 Mber Investment ftup LP h DdaftMN RLK rz Pon 95]933 'm 0 v ,1 6110 Blue Camin IM.0 Bubo 100 W—umak, hIN ssms m EDINA BYERLY'S .E' E E HWA MUM OF IFF&W1.9 PROJECT SITE PLAN Ail a 60 120 I SCALE IN FEET ngure Ip 1 Project f 2012135M Cis 2008 RLK INC. Ham Uk-, MN pJ-K Mau; 9Q 933 09� Par. 952 93911 C YRi •IL:m...... 6110 Blue Qrde Dd- • Sehe 100 • M3memnlo6 MN SSW EDINA BYERLY'S EXISTING GEOMETRICS ngure 2 Project # 2012135M iure 3 — Aerial Nnotc ol M WEVA k4i I I Its RIKO] its I I I to -'ITFFii - Z N P FT- l 91' I Hil l5r Ll 11-11 L"I 11111-1- wTlw* t CS-1 `Ulftl HE I F", 4� 7777 g linim Hazeltnn Rd _ k r - — Hazdlur ! -- w.� -.._. _ _ -_ a: FuiMlne_ — rRPd OPe� alrty �gertnitChewZ.' t t -qk Elm ~rArS �� � CerltertniaJ 1 I . !:- • Lake s a Dnkft Hr lAbE. MMNN N Ri > >�.MN x[1'7 Ph=; 9S2 933 0912 \ / Pe>+ 952 937 1153 -O� 6110 Bl— Cir 1e rj,i— • sniee 100 • hfln . - -,* MN 55W _Jo Ano�FlaOtp Br irr - uM Crr Rp�cv Mpt,�Hi $�anT"f.�DR9" . �0~ H � ! t13 0 0 o n 1 d13 302 r 11 7b 239 4 0 ` t) m 0 N n hJ - y . LEGEND EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL EXISTING STOP CONTROL x WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR XXX VOLUMES SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK XXX aEFt us ee 1001calsu -,et.uSOOAF HOUR VOLUMES EDINA BYERLY'S EXISTING VOLUMES Traffic 1 Flgurs Project / 2012135M 2008 RLK INC. E u� N N � 1 6110 Blue Ci 1 / DeI vtk MN 11u lAkP, MN llibwrq MN wmmla. MN Ml "=MN MN mom; 953 933 OM Fm 957 9331153 �Ak � S h. 100 - Minnemnl % MN 557 3 EDINA BYERLYIS SIGNAL CONTROL STOP CONTROL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 2015 NO -BUILT ^AK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS ngurs 5 Project # 2019135M U E u X11 IL , r { � � �► TTTr', �i 11 3 itt CENTER TWO- LANE W 1 Map 4 Traffic VON a+• Xi S �a d��gil y •�, ' . �J - — °`�• ' sewn L•U�ay 1, P .. nppwl l I AWnd1L it i _ � 7.1 •, ;� 'i7� - - `� � Irne9`IY �iU720iQI1nI01cDe. CraEre: U 5 Ce.l�i� l St.�,r_/. U5uA �e '3 1 6110 B1— Cild. Dd: • SOM 110 . Mian k% MN S-SW EDINA BYERLYIS PROPOSED GEOMEMCS OM LEGEND EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL MN EXISTING STOP CONTROL MN LANE DESIGNATION L.K >, PROPOSED SIGNAL CONTROL R r� ■ '� ?L=; 952 933 0472 RIGHT —OUT PYn 952 9331153 '3 1 6110 B1— Cild. Dd: • SOM 110 . Mian k% MN S-SW EDINA BYERLYIS PROPOSED GEOMEMCS OM LEGEND EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL Q5 EXISTING STOP CONTROL LANE DESIGNATION z PROPOSED SIGNAL CONTROL PROPOSED RIGHT —IN/ RIGHT —OUT ngurg 6 Project 2012135M rn v E 0 0 m 0 0 N wL O l O a d u O O O O a V LC U d r 0 n I 0 4 M 5 m i Y V i; E a rn N N n 20013 RLK INC. 611 n Hl— O. rh]nth, MN F I—,.>r, MN I llbh4g MN Min0."l. MN CMkLIc, lIN Phone: 953 933 0412 Pa 9529331153 � A • R.Im 100 • Mi2c 'lam MN S.MS EDINA BYERLY'S SIGNAL CONTROL STOP CONTROL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 2015 BUILD PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS Figure Project 2019135M 2005 RLK INC. SIGNAL CONTROL STOP CONTROL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES EI J n v Him I� MIN °N Mac lM3mamnlo„MN O�kik. d(N FIL m l 952 933 09x2 \ / F.:: 952 933 t153 -°� 6110 Blau Gale Drive • sole. IM • Ml— MN SMAll EDINA BYERLY'S 2016 BUILD PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS Figure 8 Project 11 2012135M I I 0 I 1^ 2008 RLK INC. i I n��i II ', ♦ 'Liss 1 4 1a . S ° 23 ' g 30� 4a X140 SM r �� i'' r.1ap 6 22 7• 5 P /4 t0 22 m ib 310 `+i il` — I Ira�c i .a Zi ( 14 to b 50� 269 �s [ ��7 sr. .� .. am 234 t• 4 0 64 M nmo 0 a 464 352 i ' r1 30 077 y N '---I— - - -- _.0 14 13 r- -1 t37 y '• 4177 �l ��nS 144 1 > 4. is /7 152 't i� 44 70 I LEGEND } r SIGNAL CONTROL STOP CONTROL s WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR R VOLUMES XXX SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK XXX C3 „4� ....�! - , - 1 "` Im�g_f749Z01 "cII101t710L-Ge C!•i�'ll $ 'U_ slap (cel5ove►.'JSGP,-r7i^� °rhi:! AO HOUR VOLUMES E -- n N -9 1 6110 m= L7: • Sulm 100 • D9n>Ymalg MN 55343 EDINA BYERLYIS Flqurt 9 Project / 2016 BUILD PEAK HOUR 4JRN MOVEMENTS - WITH RESTAURANT 20"'135M M �� Flun�i�AfN 'Mloneucwd, N AlN iii (]�LIc, DIN Ma"; 952 9330972 \ / Pac 952 933 1153 -9 1 6110 m= L7: • Sulm 100 • D9n>Ymalg MN 55343 EDINA BYERLYIS Flqurt 9 Project / 2016 BUILD PEAK HOUR 4JRN MOVEMENTS - WITH RESTAURANT 20"'135M 9 APPENDICES See Technical Appendices (bound separately) for Intersection LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersection operational performance reports and queuing analyses for each scenario. RLK Incorporated Page 39 of 39 Byerly's Edina Transportation Impact Analysis 11 January 16, 2013 2012 -135 -M Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: May 17, 2013 To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Byerly's — France Avenue Re- Development Dated April 26, 2013 MEMO !n v �U �O ,eeu Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plan and offer the following comments: • A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. • A developer's agreement will be required for the placement of the public water main and sanitary sewer and for any other public improvements. The developer agreement should also include cost participation for the France Avenue improvements and also should indicate that the watermain and sanitary sewer mainline are public. The agreement should also state that the City is responsible for the maintenance and operation of the watermain and sanitary sewer and in the event that the City needs to excavate for a repair of the system that the City is not responsible for restoring the surface, such as pavements and or landscaping. Civil Plat: • Sidewalk easements should be shown along France Avenue and also along Hazelton Road. Any easements needed for the roundabout should also be shown. Civil Sheet 4• • Show existing sanitary sewer trunk line located in southwest corner of the development. Civil Sheet 5• • Show updated roundabout design. • Change the island of the right -in right -out on Hazelton Rd to be concrete versus paint. Civil Sheet 6• • Storm sewer details need to show separating fabric between uncompacted subgrade and rock. • Provide additional storm sewer at entrance to underground garage of HSG A. Civil Sheet 9• • Show existing sanitary sewer trunk line located in southwest corner of development. • Re -align westerly north -south water main to eliminate bends in watermain including where the mainline connects to the watermain on Hazelton Rd. • Indicate on plans what utilities are private versus public by noting that on the pipes. • Move gate - valves on services closer to mainline. Engineering will indicate where to place the gate - valves. • Provide additional storm sewer at entrance to underground garage of HSG A. Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 1 Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952- 826 -0392 • www.Cityof clina.com r Civil Sheet 10• • Update all City of Edina details. MEMO w9SN�,r'1• o ei N r O CrJ � , .ay • ����bAppMSk� B0 ia Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. G: \PW\ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \F Streets \7171 France Avenue (Byerlys) \Staff Revievw\20130517 WH -Edina Review 7171 France.doc ion 7 Engineering Department 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 O e �� r �t� v .�o A CORP., "" 1888 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI. C. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: June 4, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Public Hearing — Receive Feasibility Study and Consider Ordering Improvements, Hazelton Road Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -417, Resolution No. 2013 -47 Action Requested: If the City Council determines the project to be necessary, cost effective, and feasible, the Council shall adopt attached Resolution No. 2013 -47 receiving the feasibility study, authorizing plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken for Hazelton Road Improvement No. BA -417. Information / Background: City staff initiated this project as part of the Byerly's Redevelopment Project. The Feasibility Study is being submitted with this report. The overall project cost is $1,043,748. Funding for this project will be from the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing district. Please refer to the Feasibility Report for a breakdown of the costs. Right -of -way for the roundabout will also be required from four property owners. However, staff is anticipating that the right -of -way will be donated. Staff has had many internal discussions regarding the roundabout and has also shared the design with the Edina Transportation Commission and also has hosted an open house for the public. Staff does not have any issues with the roundabout and has not received any correspondence regarding this project. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -47 Feasibility Study — Hazelton Road Improvements, BA -417 G: \PW\CENTRA— I\ENGDIV —I\ PROJECTS\ IMPRNO— I \BA417H— I\PRELIM— I\FEASIB -1 \PUBLIC— I%Item VI. C. Receive Feasibility Study and Consider Ordering Improvements, Hazelton Road Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -417, Resolution No. 2013- 47.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -47 RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR HAZELTON ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -417 WHEREAS, at the request of the Edina City Engineer, a study have been prepared by staff and consultant with reference to the proposed Improvement No. BA -417, Hazelton Roadway Improvements; and WHEREAS, on the 16th day.of A-1 ril, 2013, the City Council fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA-417, the proposed. improvement of Hazelton Roadway Improvements; and WHEREAS notices were mailed and published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing vtias hC, ld thereon on the 4th day of June, 2013, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary., cost - effective, and feasible. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Dated: June 4, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA. ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was: duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 4, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this:. day of 120 City Clerk G: \PV,ACENTRAL SVCS\ENG DRAPROJECTS\IMPR NOS \BA417 Hazelton Road Impr\PRELIM DES IGNTEASIBILIMPUBLIC HEARINGS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard o Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826.0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Y 4�91�11 o e O V �y • �mxrow.TE�. FEASIBILITY STUDY HAZELTON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS France Avenue (CSAH 17) to Edina Promenade IMPROVEMENT NO. BA - 417 May 29, 2013 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA hereby certify that this feasibility study was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 26082 05/29/13 Charles Rickaartt, f , PE ,rReg.g. No. Date P Approved !/T/ 44:' 9 /?p / 3 Wayn6 D. Houl , PE bate City Engineer A, _%V, )e h FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA - 417 Cr o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT �•,�bRVJMTtt CITY OF EDINA STREET IMPROVEMENTS Hazelton Road — France Avenue (CSAH 17) to Edina Promenade May 28, 2013 LOCATION: The project is located along Hazelton Road between France Avenue and the Edina pedestrian Promenade as shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1. Protect Location Map 05 0 0 pQOPj INITIATION & ISSUES: The City has been working with Lund Food Holdings for the reconstruction of the existing Byerly's grocery store site, located in the southeast quadrant of France Avenue and Hazelton Road (7171 France Avenue) to include: a new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store; a six/seven -story 109 -unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a six/seven -story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,711 square foot retail area and two levels of underground parking, and; a six -story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking. In conjunction with the site redevelopment, access to the site from France Avenue and Hazelton Road was evaluated. A key component to the proposed access configuration was the addition of a right -in /right -out on France Avenue. As part of the agreement with Hennepin County for the right - in /right -out access, modifications to the access locations on Hazelton Road were required. This included modifying the west Byerly's entrance to a right - in /right -out, modifying the west entrance for the Rue De France to a 3/ access, and providing a full movement combined east entrance for Byerly's /Szechuan Star and Guitar Center /Rue De France. Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE Two primary roadway configuration alternatives were considered for Hazelton Road. One assumed a traffic control signal at the east access and the other assumed a roundabout. Both included the modification of the west entrance to a right -in /right -out for Byerly's and a % access for Rue De France. After review of the traffic operations and impacts to the adjacent properties it was determined that the roundabout option provided the most benefit. Staff Identified Issues The following issues were identified by staff during the preliminary scoping of the project and review of the Byerly's development proposal: • Byerly's site access • Intersection operation and control at the primary site access • Poor condition of existing pavement • Existing retaining wall impacts adjacent to roadway • Pwkinn iMmirt. in .9dicent develonmants _ • Poor sidewalk condition • Pedestrian crossing at Hazelton Road and Edina Promenade Public Open House A public open house was held on May 28. Notices were sent to 93 residential and commercial properties within 1000 feet of the project. Five (5) people were in attendance at the meeting. All comments were positive in support of the project. Copies of the meeting notice and sign in sheet are included in the Appendix. Edina Transportation Commission Review The proposed project was presented to the Edina Transportation Commission on May 16. In general comments from the meeting were positive in support of the plan. A copy of the draft meeting minutes is included in the Appendix. City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update and the Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. Sidewalk Facilities Chapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of existing and proposed sidewalk facilities and funding options within the City. As shown in Figure 7.10 of Appendix N, there are existing sidewalks on both sides of Hazelton Road with no proposed additional sidewalk facilities shown for the corridor. The existing sidewalks provide connections to the north /south Edina Promenade. Bicycle Facilities Chapter 7 of the plan addresses locations of proposed bicycle facilities within the City as part of the Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. As shown in Figure 7.11 of Appendix N, Hazelton Road is not a designated bike route; however the Edina Promenade adjacent to the project is a designated primary bike route. Page 2of11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE EXISTING CONDITIONS: Hazelton Road consists of the following existing roadway characteristics: • Classified as a Collector • Posted Speed Limit — 30 mph • Bituminous pavement constructed in 1972 • Width = 51 feet (curb face to curb face) • No parking on either side • 5' sidewalk on the both sides with no boulevard • Existing ADT = 7600 vehicles per day • Projected 2030 ADT = 9000 vehicles per day • Length =1015 ft (.19 miles) Roadway Hazelton Road between France Avenue and the Edina Promenade is a bituminous roadway that was constructed in 1972 and consists of four -lanes (two in each direction) with no parking allowed on either side of the street. The width of Hazelton Road is 51 feet, from curb face to curb face. There are existing 5' sidewalks directly behind the curb on both sides of the street. The existing pavement section consists of 7" of bituminous pavement over 5" of class 5 aggregate base. ww 7r 5' 13.5' 12' 12' 13.5' 5' walk Thru Lane Thru Lane Thru Lane Thru Lane Walk Ll � �wv�•, %f4 s, ,� 51' Section Figure 2. Existing Typical Section The curb & gutter, sidewalk, and bituminous roadway are generally in poor condition. Segments of the sidewalk are structurally deteriorating, are trip hazards, and are less than the minimum City standard width of 5 feet. In addition, the sidewalks on both sides of Hazelton Road are located adjacent to the curb lines with no boulevard. The following photos illustrate the existing conditions. Photo 1 — Pavement Condition Page 3 of 11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE Photo 2 — Sidewalk Photo 3 — Looking West towards France Avenue .Kn mem-6-1mr. WIT Photo 4 — Retaining Wall at Rue De France Photo 5 — Looking East towards Edina Promenade Page 4of11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE Photo 6 — Edina Promenade Crossing Geotechnical Information A geotechnical evaluation report was prepared for the adjacent Byerly's development. It indicates that the soil conditions in the area mostly consist of sandy loams, loamy sands, and sandy clay loams. Municipal State Aid Street Hazelton Road, from France Avenue to York Avenue is a designated Municipal State Aid Street (MSA) and is eligible to receive funding through the State gas tax. The purpose of this fund is to help local governments construct and maintain collector and arterial roadways. The State Aid office of MnDOT has established clearly defined design requirements for MSA streets. Bicvcle Accommodations According to the City of Edina's Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, Hazelton Road is not currently on the City's bicycle system. However, the Edina Promenade has a designation as a primary route for cyclists. The primary goal of the Bicycle Transportation Plan is to provide a safe and convenient bicycle transportation network. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer: The trunk sanitary sewer system along Hazelton Road consists of 9 -inch diameter clay pipe running from France Avenue east through the project area. Five (5) services are provided from this sewer main Watermain: The existing watermain is an 8 -inch, ductile iron pipe, from France Avenue to the east. Six (6) services and two hydrants are provided from this watermain. Storm Sewer: In general, storm water runoff is channeled along curb and gutter where it is captured in storm sewer catch basins. The storm water on the west end of the project is conveyed through an 18 -inch RCP pipe to the France Avenue system. The storm water on the east end of the project is conveyed through a 21 -inch pipe to the York Avenue system. Both systems ultimately routed to Centennial Lake. Page 5 of 11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE Private Utilities Private utilities extend along the corridor. All utilities are located underground. The existing gas main runs along the southside of the roadway. The City's fiber optic line runs along the north side of the roadway. Street Lighting consists of "shoebox" style lighting. In addition, there are bollard lights at the Promenade entrance. Landscaping Some properties have vegetation, hardscapes (such as monuments and retaining walls), or other landscaped items within or adjacent to the City right - of -way. Many of these landscape items are located directly behind the sidewalks. Some of these landscape items will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary reconstruction work. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The following improvements are proposed: • Addition of a raised concrete median west of France Avenue • Modification to the Byerly's /Rue de France access • Construction of a roundabout at the Byerly's /Guitar Center access • Reconstruction of the existing undisturbed pavement • Sidewalk connections to the Edina Promenade • Drainage improvements as needed • Manhole and gate valve adjustments for the utility systems P/E 5' Ft/W W4 5' 5' 5' 12.5 16' 12.5' 5' 5' 5' Walk Blvd Shid Thru lane Median Thru Lane Shld Blvd Walk - - 51' Section Figure 3. Proposed Typical Sections Roadway Components Proposed 1. Driving Lanes: Currently there are two driving lanes in each direction; one 12' lane and one 13.5' lane. It is proposed to reduce the number of lanes to one 12.5' lane in each direction. The lane widths will meet all State Aid Standards. Page 6of11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE Shoulders: There are currently no paved shoulders on this section of roadway. It is proposed that a 5' shoulder /gutter be provided in each direction. Although Hazelton Road is not a designated bike route, including the 5' shoulder as a gutter will provide an improved bike connection to the Edina Promenade. 3. East Access Intersection Control (Roundabout): A roundabout is proposed as the intersection control for the east access to Byerly's /Guitar Center. The intersection was studied to determine the appropriate location, size and configuration. Some of the concerns indicated were with providing adequate movements for Fire trucks and impacting the least number of parking stalls in the Rue De France and Guitar Center lots. The resulting roundabout has the following characteristics: Modified Elliptical shape to provide for improved east /west and east to south Fire Truck movements. See Appendix for illustrations of the fire truck turning templates. Removing of the parking lot separation between Rue De France and Guitar Center to improve circulation from the roundabout. Removing 8 parking stalls from Guitar Center, 4 parking stalls from Szechuan Star and no parking stalls from Rue De France. i Figure 4. Proposed East Access Roundabout i 4. West Access Intersection Control (Partial): The west access to the Rue De France eliminates the left turns out of the driveway. All other movements will be maintained including the addition of a dedicated left turn lane from eastbound Hazelton Road into the site. The west access into the Byerly's site will be restricted to right -in /right -out. The center median island will be mountable to provide for trucks turning into the Byerly's loading dock area Page 7of11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE Figure 5. Proposed West Access 5. Sidewalks: The existing 5'sidewalks are located directly behind the curb with no boulevard. It is proposed that a new 5' boulevard be provided between the curb and the sidewalk. 6. Metro Transit Bus Stop: The existing Metro Transit bus stop on France Avenue will be relocated to eastbound Hazelton Road between France Avenue and the west Byerly's access. The details of the stop will be addressed in the final design of the project. 7. Enhanced Crosswalks: Pedestrian crossings at the roundabout will be marked with in -laid pavement brick patterned pavement markings similar to other new crossings in the City of Edina. It is proposed to add "in -laid" pavement markings and signage to enhance the visibility of the crosswalks (see example below). r Xr Ir - Figure 6. "In- Laid" Crosswalk and Example (701h Street) 8. Landscaped Median: The center islands will be landscaped, which will include shrubs, trees and native grasses. The treatment will be similar to the style implemented on 701h Street near the Galleria. Page 8of11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE 9. Pedestrian Level Lighting_ Pedestrian level lighting will be included adjacent to the sidewalk to supplement the existing and proposed street lighting. The poles and fixtures will be similar to those proposed for the France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing project. 10. Pedestrian Crossing (Promenade): Currently the pedestrian crossing at the Edina Promenade is push button activated and requires the pedestrian to cross 4 lanes of traffic. Although no changes are proposed to the actual crossing, the proposed improvements will reduce the number of lanes to be crossed to one in each direction, and will provide a refuge island in the center should the pedestrian not make it across. 11. Pedestrian Curb Ramps: All of the pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards as dictated by MSA and ADA. 12. Edina Public Utilities: Sanitary Sewer: The sanitary sewer pipe system will be evaluated during final design. It is assumed that no pipe repair work is needed with the project. Manholes will be adjusted as required. Watermain: City staff is currently evaluating the watermain system to determine if any areas have a history of breaks. The areas that are deemed deficient will be replaced. The two hydrants within the project area will be replaced with City standard hydrants. Gate valves will be adjusted as required. Storm Sewer: The existing storm sewer is proposed to be replaced to meet the capacity needs based on the City of Edina's Stormwater Management Plan and MSA standards. r r 1 r Rs 1ff1f t f ► , � ht ''.. T g5 ,. -- Iwo - -- Figure 7 - Proposed Project Layout 1 L` ,n r Page 9 of 11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: PROJECT COSTS & FUNDING: FEASIBILITY: Permanent right -of -way and temporary easement will be needed from the Rue De France, Guitar Center, Szechuan Star and Byerly's. It is anticipated all right -of -way needed will be donated by the adjacent properties. as f � T � •' - �aw M 0 Ir F `�'� k inn+ r Ir<c�r F tr I•rr jftf r Figure 8 — Right- of -WaV Required J R The total estimated project cost is $1,043,748. The total estimated cost includes a 10% construction contingency and 22% for engineering, administration, and financing. A table outlining the construction cost is including in the Appendix. Funding for the entire project will be through the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district- The proposed improvements as outlined in this study are found to be necessary, cost effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. Page 10 of 11 Feasibility Study HAZELTON ROAD — FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINA PROMENADE PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an engineering standpoint: APPENDIX: City Council Orders the Public Hearing ......................... ............................... May 7, 2013 Edina Transportation Commission Reviews Project ..... ............................... May 16, 2013 Neighborhood Meeting .................:............................. ............................... May 28, 2013 Feasibility Report Received by City Council ...................... ...........................June 4, 2013 City Council Conducts Public hearing and Orders Project . ...........................June 4. 2013 City Council and MnDOT approve Plans and Specifications ................6............ July, 2013 Receive Bids ................... ............................... Late Summer 2013/ Early Summer 2010) Award Contract ............... ............................... Late Summer 2013/ Early Summer 2010) Begin Construction .......... ............................... Late Summer 2013/ Early Summer 2014(') Complete Construction .............................................. ............................... Summer 2014 (1) — Schedule is dependent on the construction schedule for the France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing project and the Byerly's redevelopment improvements. A. Informational Meeting Notice and Sign In Sheet B. Draft ETC Meeting Minutes C. City Comprehensive Plan —Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities (Fig. 7.10 and 7.11) D. Construction Cost Estimate E. Fire Truck Turning Illustrations Page 11 of 11 May 15, 2013 RE: Hazelton Roadway Improvements and Public Hearing Dear Area Property Owners: The Edina City Council is considering a safety improvement project along Hazelton Road. You are invited to an open house and also a public hearing for this project. If you are unable to attend the public hearing, you may submit your comment via email to mail @EdinaMN.gov. You will be able to provide input at both meetings; dates for the meetings are: Open House Tuesday, May 28, 5 to 6 PM Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Public Hearin Tuesday, June 4, 7 PM City Council Chambers — City Hall 4801 50`1' St W The project consists of reducing the lanes from four to a modified three / two lanes, a roundabout will be constructed just west of the Promenade, and sidewalks will be upgraded to boulevard style sidewalks; see sketch. ttm ' a Tr Thank you, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering GAPIMCENTRAL SVCS%ENG MAPROJECTMIMPR NOS%BA417 Hazelton Road InnpMDMIN1C0RR%LETTS & EMAILSQ0130514 Invite Itr BA417.docx Neighborhood Open House 5:00 – 7.00 PM– Tuesday, May 28, 2013 o e `•t? Sign In Sheet 72nd Street (RI/RO) WSB Project No. 01686 -400 Name Address Telephone Emai Mobile/Fax Comment Kaij 1'.'; Nan k L!W&Al- 7/10 A.4Nr -z 4v.- > 4(7MF_ Q kI , Ca� Jt-,Kl i PM 14k)-i- 71 -71 FAN AV 915 -&�Q _. .- e- r� P;I. seA 130 1enngf►1P -% Asa- 2,17'M J pf11p5ef'o A44 -lir4l.4ek ccr� �vlt✓1 gaQo perxale^ fch rce4 W. rJr A4 Cj7Zs Page 1 K.• 101686- 4001AdminMeetingLWeetingSign -ln 051813.doc (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING HAZELTON ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -417 The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, June 4, 2013, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing for Hazelton Roadway Improvements. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2013 or 2014. The proposed plans can be found online at: httr): / /edinamn.gov /index.r)hp ?section= hdzelton roadway To comment on these plans, you may: -Write to City of Edina, Attention Engineering, 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, MN 55439 • Email to mail @EdinaMN.4ov, attention City Council and Engineering -Attend the Public Hearing and offer comments. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Debra Mangen City Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN ON May 30, 2012 PLEASE SEND TWO (2) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION. BILL TO CITY OF EDINA. MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM MAY 16, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Sierks, Spanhake and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Bass to approve the meeting agenda. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES DC/_111 AD RACC711Ur nE ADRII 2C -min The following corrections were made: page 4, paragraph 1, "...Expect bid delay..." change to "...Expect big delay...," "...related to their..." change to "...related to the City's..." Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Braden to approve the revised minutes of April 25, 2013. Ayes: Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, LaForce, Nelson, Spanhake, Whited Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Prioritization of Sidewalk Projects Director Houle said there are seven sidewalk projects that were either petitioned by residents or were requested by City Council and with the PACS fund now in place, he asked that the ETC prioritize the sidewalks and recommend to the City Council which one(s) should be built in 2013. He suggested eight principles that could be used in prioritizing the sidewalks and said in the future, they would rely on an updated sidewalk plan and policy as well as the Living Streets Implementation Plan. He said staff has already completed draft feasibility studies and estimates for some of the sidewalks. The seven sidewalks are: 1. School Rd —from Normandale Rd to School Rd along 60th St W, along School Rd from 60th St W to Concord Ave ($310,000) 2. 42nd St W — from Oakdale Ave to France Ave ($440,000) 3. W. Normandale Frontage Rd —from Benton Ave south to Clover Ridge ($190,000) 4. Xerxes Ave — from 60th St w to 56th St W ($480,000) 5. Interlachen Blvd — from Mirror Lakes Dr to Vernon Ave ($700,000) 6. E. Normandale Rd —from 70th St W to 66th St W (feasibility study not completed) 7. Cornelia Ave / West Shore Dr / Dunberry La — between 70th St and 66th St W (feasibility study not completed) Discussion included: a How to evaluate principle #3 "sidewalk on streets with demonstrated safety issues for pedestrians;" no evaluation is in place yet; "demonstrated" was used to differentiate between perception; perception must be considered if the goal is to shift mode; general engineering evaluation practice is to separate pedestrians and vehicles when there are 500 -750 cars per day. • How to advocate for a street like Interlachen Blvd with few properties. • The seven sidewalks are in order of how they should be built based on safety, opportunity, etc. • Areas with a safety issue should be a priority, followed by school zones. • Should sidewalks be built based on demands or what is right for Edina? • Start with a map of existing sidewalks to equitably fill in all quadrants. • PACS fund for the first year is not for a full year and it will also fund the transportation planner's salary and the Wooddale Ave restriping project. • Community input is important. • Money is available to build at least two sidewalks in 2013 and selecting two is the goal; a transportation planner will soon be hired to help them define principles and the Living Streets Policy. • Can we build in phases to get as much done as possible? • Walk /bike to school just took place recently and students from Cornelia Elementary could not participate because there are no safe routes. Motion was made by member LaForce to recommend School Road, Xerxes Avenue, and Interlachen Blvd, in no particular order, pending funding discussion by staff with City Manager. The motion was seconded by member Janovy. After discussion, the motion was amended to include West Shore /Cornelia. All voted aye. Motion carried. Motion was made by member LaForce to recommend connecting the cul -de -sac at 59th St W to Normandale Rd going towards Benton Ave and the motion was seconded by member Whited. All voted aye. Motion carried. Hazelton Road Improvements Director Houle said staff and Byerly's have been working with Hennepin County since last year to get approval for a right -in /right -out onto France Ave. Hennepin County have agreed to this and will be providing a letter of support. Hennepin County required that the access from 72nd St W to France Ave be reduced to a three - quarter access to prevent vehicles from exiting Byerly's site and travel across France Ave to 72nd St W. Additionally, they also asked for enhancement to the two accesses east of Byerly's on Hazelton Rd. Mr. Andrew Plowman with WSB explained that the project will include one lane in each direction, landscaped medians, % access at west entrance, a modified elliptical shape roundabout at east entrance with adequate movement for fire trucks, and right -in /right -out at Byerly's west entrance. At the Rue De France west entrance, an island will be added to eliminate left turns, and the Szechuan Star driveway will be relocated but location is still to be determined. Director Houle said the cost split will be 1/3 City and 2/3 Byerly's. An open house is scheduled for May 28, 5 -6 p.m. to share the proposal with the public and on June 4, the City Council will hold a public hearing for the roadway improvements at the same time they consider final approval for the Byerly's redevelopment. 2 Discussion included: • Liked the plan. • Senses that they are creating more driving thru and parking lots (Byerly's and Macy's has a cross easement that allows Byerly's traffic to drive across Macy's parking lot to Gallagher Dr.) • Now that neighborhoods are defined we should start using this to define notices and mailing area (open house /public hearing notices were mailed to everyone within 1,000 ft. of the project.) • It was noted that the communications committee was to review the communications plan that is in place. Traffic Safety Committee Report of MaV 1, 2013 Regarding Section A, member La Force asked if staff was recommending an exception and Director Houle said no. He said it is an offset intersection. Motion was made by member lyer and seconded by member LaForce to forward the Traffic Safety Committee Report of May 1 to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Living Streets Policy Update Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager, presented the presentation that she will be giving to boards, commissions and staff about the Living Streets Policy. The Living Streets Policy was developed by the ETC. It will be presented to City Council on July 16 in a work session. Member Bass recommended doing a presentation to the two watershed districts because in Maplewood, their watershed district was very supportive and even provided a grant. Ms. Kurt said the plan is to form an advisory committee (including the transportation planner) and begin meeting in July to finalize the policy. Member Whited volunteered to serve on the committee. Discussion included: • Are we benchmarking to other communities? Not at this time because there really isn't any to benchmark to. There is software that rates infrastructure but it is heavy on the transportation side but falls short on the 'green' side. • Trees do not play a prominent role in this policy — Maplewood included ash trees when they did reconstruction projects. The Energy & Environment Commission (EEC) might want to comment on this. • Make transportation and 'green' equitable in the policy. • BARR had good visuals that would help with presentation to the community. • Can add another principle on landscaping and trees but do not want to slow down the process. • Keep going and ask the EEC to help in this area. • Are costs increasing and Living Streets will help to reduce costs? It is more about having data in one place to serve competing interests. • It is transportation - heavy, are we missing benchmarks that other boards and commission could relate to? Updates Student Members Member Schweiger said he will be biking more this summer after seeing the rise in gas price! Member Sierks said she will be reapplying to serve on the ETC and asked for everyone's support. Bike Edina Task Force Received minutes of April 11, 2013. Member Janovy said the Police are focusing on bike safety and that there is a need for bike education. Living Streets Working Group — None Transportation Options Working Group Member Whited said she met with Manager Neal to clarify that it was her company, PRISM, that would be getting the money and not her. Member Janovy said the ETC knew member Whited's association with i'R1IS1`1� iidhen ti icy iiiadc the rcw�iuiicndativn and chair Ireiwn added that ti icy did ivvk at vtiicr options and decided to go with PRISM. Member Whited said her company applied for a Freedom Funds grant for a new vehicle (for this operation) and they've made it through the first round. Communications Committee - None Member Bass asked if the City Council received their communications recommendation and Director Houle said they did but they did not offer any comments. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues - None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Bass said she attended a Living Streets workshop sponsored by Allianz for Sustainability at the League of Minnesota Cities and shared what the ETC have done so far, how they've generated support and how do.Town helped to facilitate community engagement around Living Streets. She said one difference is that the ETC's policy was generated out of a transportation group while others are generated from environmental groups with a real focus on green elements. She said everyone is struggling with how to do community engagement. Member Bass said MnDOT has released solicitation for Safe Routes to School funds. She said the infrastructure is predictable (mostly sidewalks) but most of the non - infrastructure grants are to school districts or other public institutions for hiring Safe Routes coordinator to implement education and enforcement activities. Additionally, school districts are purchasing bike fleets and offering education and maintenance to students and staff. Member Bass shared this as ideas for funding and implementation in Edina. Chair Nelson said the Grandview Area redevelopment is starting up again and they are looking for a representative from the ETC. Member Janovy volunteered. 4 STAFF COMMENTS • A work session with the ETC and City Council is scheduled for July 16. • The next France Ave Urban Design meeting will be June 6 or 17, 7 p.m. at the Public Works and Park Maintenance facility. An email will be sent to confirm the date. • 2014 Reconstruction Projects — an open house was held last year; surveyors are currently working the areas; next month the ETC will receive information for review and feedback. • The Woodd.ale Restriping Request for Purchase is going to City Council on May 21 for approval. • The Lake Edina Pathway was approved by City Council. Engineering is designing the path and Public Works will build it. Staff will take into consideration concern of golf balls being hit towards the path when deciding how high to build the fence. • 54th St W and bridge improvements are scheduled for 2014 and staff is reviewing four proposais to select a consultant for the project. Park Maintenance, Public Works, Economic Development and Engineering are reviewing the proposals. Public engagement is a key component in the proposal. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session tt of Mtgs Attendance % MeetingsMork Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 5, . Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 4,- 80% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 .4''J. 80 %° Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 41 80 %° I er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 .4 :., .:; ,.. 80 %, - Janovy, Jennifer 211/2014 1 1 1 1 1 .5 LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 5 Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 _5 '!00 %0 Schwei er, Steven student 1 1 1 3 ..60% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 1 4 80 %° S anhake, Dawn 1 2/1/2016 1 1 40% . Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 V5� 900 %0 3 158 M IEW SHWN+10 62 .�riw� ��[Ll�i�lllll 17 1Tc� 11 Id Bm,fo,- �' 494.v. iL 158 i.EN'MIWA1111I&M ::100 62 494 17 21 31 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS HAZELTON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WSB Project: HAZELTON ROAD Project Location: City of Edina WSB Project No.: 1686 -400 Date: 5292013 Opinion of Probable Cost Item Number _ Description Unit Unit Price PROJECI'TOTAL Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 535,000.00 1.00 $35,000.0 2031.501 FIELD OFFICE TYPE D EACH $8,000.00 1.00 $9,000.0 2101,502 CLEARING TREE $200.00 20 $4,000.00 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE SI25.00 20 520500.00 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LIN FT $12.00 200 52,400.00 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT $2.50 3600 $9,000.00 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT $1.00 8500 $8,500.00 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 1 $2.00 7500 515,000.00 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 5800.00 2 $1,600.0 2104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE &BOX EACH $230.00 4 $920.0 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 5151100 4 $600.00 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN TYPE C EACH $25.00 10 $250.0 2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 52.50 300 $750.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CUYD $10.00 300 53,000.00 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CUYD $12.00 500 56,000.00 2105,522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CUYD 1 $18.00 500 59,000.0 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CUYD $8,00 1000 58,000.00 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 5300.00 15 54,501100 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P) CUYD $22.00 1200 526,400.00 2301.503 CONCRETE PAVEMENT IRREGULAR WIDTH 7.0" SQYD 532.00 260 58,320.0 2301.511 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE CUYD $150.00 60 $9,000.00 2301.529 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED) POUND 54.00 440 $1,760.0 2301.602 1" DOWEL BAR EACH $8.00 700 $2,400.00 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COARSE MIX (3,C) TON $66.00 1550 $102,300.0 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,B) TON $62.00 1150 $71,300.00 2502.601 IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVISION LUMP SLIM SI0,000.00 1 SI0,000.00 2503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V LIN FT $25.00 150 53,750.00 2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 LIN FT 532.00 40 $1,280.0 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH $600.00 8 $4,800.00 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 51,000.00 2 $2,000.00 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH $2,700.00 1 52,700,0 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE &BOX EACH 5200,00 4 $800.0 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND S3.50 200 5700.0 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TYPE CC -48 LIN FT 5400.00 80.00 532,000.00 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 5500.00 8 $4,000.00 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ Fir $3.50 8500 $29,750.00 2531,501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B612 LIN FT 512.00 130 511560.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8618 LIN FT 514.00 2500 $35,000.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN S524 LIN FT $18.00 250 54,500.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B660 LIN FT $25,00 1,700 512,500.00 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT HE SQ YD 560.00 200 $12,000.00 2571.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT $40.00 120 54,800.00 2545.511 LIGHTING UNIT TYPE RESIDENTIAL 25'SHOEBOX EACH 511,000.00 14 5154,000.00 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SLIM $30,000.00 1.00 530,000.00 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 530.00 100.00 $3,000.00 2571.503 ORNAMENTAL TREE 5' HT BR TREE $300.00 15.00 $4,500.00 2571.504 ISHRUB SHRUB $50.00 150.00 57,500.00 2571.507 PERENNIAL PLANT 515.00 500.00 $7,500.00 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED LIN FT 52.00 150 5300.00 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 5250.00 8 52,000.00 2573.602 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 51,000.00 2 $2,000.0 2575.505 SODDING TYTC SALT RESISTANT SQ YD $3.00 3500 510,500.00 2582.501 PAVT MSSG(YIELD) EPDXY EACH 5150.00 4 $600.00 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -EPDXY LIN FT $0.50 2500 $ 1,250.00 2582.502 24" DOTTED LINE WHITE -EPDXY LIN FT $6.75 72 $486.00 2582,502 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY LIN FT $0.50 60 570.00 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY LIN FT 10.75 600 5450.00 2582.618 CROSSWALK MARKING SPECIAL SQFT 515.00 1400 $21,000.00 CONSTRUCTION TOT Ai b ii,(StiM ' Page 1 KA01686400 \QuantiryA Preliminary% Engineers_Estimate(Prelim).xlsx Hazelton Road — Fire Truck Turning Movements East/West Movements MAYOR AND COUNCIL Jeff Long Chief of Police Agenda Item #: VIII.A Action Discussion Information ❑ Subject: Appeal From License Denial: Curtiss Delane Smith, Resolution No. 2013 -49 Action Requested: ACTION REQUESTED: Affirm the denial of the Peddler and Solicitor Permit requested by Curtiss Delane Smith. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: On April 15, 2013 Curtiss Smith applied for a Peddler and Solicitor Permit to promote "Twin City Contracting ". As part of the application process, the applicants are supplied with an overview copy of Edina Ordinance #1311, which covers Peddlers and Solicitors. In addition they are provided with a sheet titled "Checklist and Procedures for Peddler and Solicitor Applicants ". On the, previously mentioned checklist it is explained that they are giving consent to have a background check completed. It also indicates that "Any falsification of answers on the application or if the application is not completed in its entirety the application will be denied ". On page two of the application the following "yes or no" check box question is asked, "Have you ever been convicted of a rcrime, or violation of any municipal ordinance, other than a petty misdemeanor traffic offense ?" The question is then followed by the statement of, "If yes, answer the following questions ". City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 Mr. Smith selected the box that said "no" to being convicted of a crime. He then wrote the exact words "I never been convicted of a major crime small traffic stuff /no'felonies ". (Spaces inserted where he left large spaces) Upon completion of the background check it was discovered that the applicant had several misdemeanor convictions involving theft, traffic offenses as well as a gross misdemeanor conviction for "False Information to a Court Official'. Edina City Ordinance 1311.05 reads: Denial of Permit Application or Registration Application. In addition to the provisions of Section 160 of this code, the following shall constitute grounds for denial of the permit application or registration application: (A) Past fraud, misrepresentation or misstatement made in the course of carrying on business as a peddler or solicitor. (B) Conviction of any crime or crimes directly related to carrying on business as a peddler or solicitor, as provided in M.S.364.03, Subd.2, where the applicant has not shown competent evidence or sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to perform the duties and responsibilities, as provided in M.S.364.03, Subd.3. Crimes that are considered to be directly related to the business of peddling and soliciting include but are not limited to crimes involving assault, -criminal sexual conduct, burglary, robbery, fraud, theft or moral turpitude. (C) Revocation of a past permit issued under this Section. (D) Past violations of any provision of this Section. The applicant has prior theft convictions, which he did not disclose. Theft is listed in 1311.05 (B) as a ground for denial. In addition, Edina City Ordinance #160 referred to in the above listed ordinance (1311.05), addresses additional reasons for denial. Specifically, Ordinance 160.04 (B), states that "Misstatements in the application" are cause for denial. The applicant clearly failed to note his criminal convictions. On April 16th 2013, Curtiss Smith was mailed a letter informing him that his application had been denied due to misrepresentations on the application. recommend that the City Council affirm the denial of this Peddler and Solicitor Permit. * ), RESOLUTION NO. 2013-49 DENYING APPEAL OF PEDDLER AND SOLICTORS PERMIT Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 On April 15, 2013, Curtiss Smith applied for a Peddler and Solicitors Permit. 1.02 The application asks if the applicant has ever been convicted of a crime, or violation, of any municipal ordinance, other than a petty misdemeanor traffic offense. Mr. Smith answered the question with the "No" box. He hand wrote the following words underneath the box, "I never been convicted of a major crime small traffic stuff /no felonies ". 1.03 A criminal background check showed that Curtiss Smith had convictions of misdemeanor Theft and gross misdemeanor False Information to a Court Official. 1.04 Edina- City- Ordinancet#160.04(B.)states that" Misstatements_ inthe _application"-axe_cause -for_denial 1.05 Edina City Ordinance #1311.05 (B) indicates that a theft conviction is also a cause for denial. 1.06 On April 16th, 2013 a letter was mailed informing Mr. Smith that his application had been denied due to misrepresentations on the application. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Curtiss Smith failed to disclose his criminal convictions on the Peddler and Solicitor Application. 2.02 Edina City Ordinance #160.04 (B) states that "Misstatements in the application" are cause for denial. 2.03 Edina City Ordinance #1311.05 (B) indicates that a theft conviction is also a cause for denial. 2.04 A criminal background check revealed that Mr. Smith had previous convictions for "Theft" and "False Information to a Court Official". 2.05 Based on the misstatements by Curtiss Smith and his Theft conviction, the Peddler and Solicitor Application was denied. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the Appeal of the Peddler and Solicitor Application. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 4, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK � t I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 4, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. Edina Police Department Memo To: Sergeant Tim Olson From: Lynn Olson Date: 04/15/13 Subject: Solicitor Applications/ Curtiss Smith / Twin Cities Contracting Werooeived-the mr -hed- application- for - solicitation -on 04/-15/-13. The following systems have been checked for this applicant: Statewide Supervision: Odyssey: See attached Portal (QDP, KQ): See Attached Pistol: Crimes: DE Hennepin Warrants: Ramsey Warrants: On the attached application for solicitation Mr. Imith failed to accurately answer the question in regards to any convictions he might have. He failed to disclose several misdemeanor convictions involving theft convictions, traffic offense as well as a gross misdemeanor conviction for FALSE INFORMATION TO COURT OFFICIAL. At this time I have not looked any further into the applicants background as these should be grounds for a denial. Based on the information gathered, I submit the attached application for your consideration. Thank you. Attachments 4,9A.t o� a 0 City of Edina Curtiss Delane Smith 910 Portland Ave #325 Minneapolis, MN 55404 April 16, 2013 RE: Application for Solicitation/Curtiss Smith/Twin Cities Contracting Dear Mr. Smith: This letter is to inform you that your application for solicitation in The City of Edina has been denied due to misrepresentations on the'application as stated in the following city * Edina City Code 160.04, Section B According to the Edina City Code, applicants who have been denied may appeal the denial to the City Council. To appeal, an applicant should file a written request appealing the denial with the City Clerk. The City Council would hear the appeal within thirty days of receiving it. Enclosed is a copy of Edina Code Section 160.04, 160.05 and 160.06 for your review. Sincerely, i Chief Jeff Lo , Edina Police Department Enclosure Cc: City Clerk NM/lo Edina Police Department Administration (952) 826 -1610 4801 West 50th Street Fax (952) 826 -1607 Edina, Minnesota Police 24 hr. and TDD Line (952) 826 -1600 55424 -1394 J�t3' /71 14 0 -3 Fe LU Ff y 012 )Pr JAOLOe -T U FO F, u f %}�C'r� D orb TO Fb '71) e )tV 'Tfe 11 vt "i 0 tlu-e l� SI p{ F qucP .�om5 of TO o�E f3 uj sc� 120eoE � P FT s�hc� � w�wf fio Sc�oo r wf-� hoer !�. Sv9�'cP .r wa � c,u��+ � Cocc I �cn lw.c�' he (P "C(�1� J0 ln�i� OFF !M y Reelora So log q 1 17 o . SQL S �a� � 3_�;rlr TTl A TT CNXT o i Le _I >4� o r . • rN�i7iipp{iAT�� • 1888 To:. MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda,..Item #: VIII. B. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Pate: June 4, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -48 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipients departments for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -48 City of Edina 4801 W. 50Th St Edina, MN 55424 . RESOLUTION NO. 2013-48 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON rI j BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its,citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Patricia Sullivan Metal Standing Easel Jan Grote Easel, Oil Paints, Brushes & Paper Pinstripes Restaurant Food For EPAC June 12, 2013 Event Ruth & Mark Valgemae $500.00 Braemar Golf Course Memorial Fund: Timothy Lees $50.00 Dated: June 4, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA 1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June4, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: Mayor Hovland and City Council Members From: Bill Neuendorf / Economic Development Manager Date: June 4, 2013 Subject: Grandview Community Advisory Team Appointments Action Requested: Appoint a slate of candidates. o e • `��RPORHTD� • 1888 Agenda Item M VIII. C. Action IR Discussion 0 Information F-1 Information / Background: Based on the positive feedback received at the May 17, 2013 update, staff has continued to plan for the creation of a Community Advisory Team to help guide the redevelopment of the Grandview District. As of May 17, 2013, more than 20 residents have expressed interest in participating. A roster of candidates is attached. Time is of the essence in convening this Advisory Team. There is much work to do so that the implementation of the Grandview Development Framework can be accelerated. Attachments: Roster of Candidates with Addresses (dated May 30, 2013) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 Grandview Community Advisory Team Roster of Interested Candidates (with Addresses) Categories of Membership (# of seats) Interested Candidates as of 5/17/13 Address Preference Commercial property owner within Grandview (1) Nancy Grazzini Olson Eden 100 building, 5100 Eden Ave. Darcy Winter Representing Jerry's Enterprises, 5125 Vernon Ave. Bill McReavy Washburn- McReavy funeral home, 5000 West 50th Business owner or manager within Grandview (1) Bill McReavy See above Colin Bredesen Patisserie Margo, 5133 Gus Young Ln Planning Commission, active members (2) Kevin Staunton 5277 Lochloy Dr x Michael Schroeder 7020 Kellogg Ave x Transportation Commission, active member (1) Jennifer Janovy 4016 Inglewood Ave x Park & Recreation representative (1) Sue Jacobson 5812 Vernon La x Neighborhood resident, (2) Tara Finn 5221 Richwood Dr Chris Rofidal 5037 56th St W Richard Borland 5004 Yvonne Ter Pat Olk 5315 Pinewood Tr Chris Walgren 5233 Richwood Dr Jimmy Bennett 5332 Interlachen Blvd Community resident, at large (2) Matt Goldstein 5908 Crescent Sandy Fox 580168th St W Bright Dornblaser 4630 Drexel Ave Andy Brown 5512 Park PI Thomas Raeuchle 4634 Bruce Ave Timothy Kuck 6316 Westwood Ct Mike Fischer 4512 Dunham Dr Lisa Diehl 5301 Ayrshire Blvd Larry Chestler 5117 Mirror Lakes Dr Sue Davison 6716 Galway Dr Updated May 30, 2013 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: June 4, 2013 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council Meeting. No action is requested. 'w9��11rj,, • !,roRPORP��9 • Jess Agenda Item #: IX. A. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information X s� abbeys HOPE SAFER POOLS. SAFER KIDS. May 28th, 2013 Mayor Jim Hovland Office of the Mayor City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, Please accept this letter as our cordial invitation to attend the World's Largest Swimming Lesson on Tuesday, June 18th from 10 -11 a.m. at the Edina Aquatics Center. Each year, non- profits, public health organizations and municipal governments organize coordinated swim lessons for children around the world. This year, we are expecting that the Edina event will have a record number of participants. In fact, we believe that our event has an excellent chance to break the world record for the largest swim lesson at a single facility. Your presence, participation, and brief remarks will help us to not only draw attention to the importance of swim lessons, but will also raise the profile of the event in our community. As you know, last year, we had a record number of drownings in Minnesota. We believe that the vast majority of these incidents could have been prevented if children had been taught appropriate swimming skills and prevention techniques. It is our hope that our swim lesson will contribute to a safer summer for the Edina community. The Edina community, over the years, has been so supportive of our foundation's mission. Your presence at this event would be another great opportunity to showcase our partnership and your commitment to the children of Edina. Please contact me or our program coordinator, Sam Carolus at sam@abbeyshope.org or 952.303.5421 if you'd like more details about our event. We look forward to hearing from you about your participation! Keep the Faith, K a t i !yT to C o- Founder, Abbey's Hope Charitable Foundation 5021 Vernon Aue. Suite 164 www obbeidshope.org phone (952) 303.5421 e-mail, info @abbegshope.org mail Edina, Minnesota 55436 6605 Kenney Place Edina, MN 55439 May 29, 2013 Ann Kattreh Park and Recreation Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Ann, Effective immediately, I am submitting my resignation as the Chair of the Edina Veterans Memorial Committee. I am extremely proud of what the committee has accomplished to date, regarding the establishment of a memorial honoring the veterans from the Edina community who served their country. However, I believe that a change in the committee's leadership at this time would increase the probability that the memorial project will move forward resulting in the construction of the memorial. I remain steadfast in my belief that a memorial in this community is long overdue and I will continue to support the committee's efforts in this regard in any way I am able. I look forward to the day that the memorial is dedicated to all veterans, but especially to those who lost their lives in the service of their country. Regards, Michael G. Goergen Cc: Mayor James Hovland Kristin Aarsvold. Florence M. McCarthy 5501 Dewey Hill Road #321 Edina, Minnesota 55439 May 24, 2013 Scott Neal, City Manager and Jeff Long, Police Chief City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina Minnesota 55424 Dear City Manager Neal and Police Chief Long, I am writing to express my deep appreciation for the kindness, courtesy, and professionalism of an Edina police officer, Officer Scott Thompson. Recently, my husband experienced a severe heart attack while driving his car. We are both in our 80s. My first indication that this event had occurred was when Officer Thompson knocked on my door to advise me what had happened and to help get me to the hospital. From my first contact with him, Officer Thompson was the essence of thoughtfulness, respect and consideration. I simply can not imagine how any person could have helped me through those first minutes and hour of that horrible time as well as Officer Thompson did. He is an amazing person and a consummate professional who is a credit to the City of Edina and to the Edina Police. I commend him to you and hope that he receives whatever recognition is appropriate for providing invaluable help and assistance to a citizen of Edina at what was a very difficult time. I am more grateful than you will ever know. Thank you. Sincerely, )Xv &A/ P. S.: City Manager Neal has my permission to share this letter with the Council if he wishes and if Chief Long and Officer Thompson consent. cc: Officer Scott Thompson Susan Howl Subject: MSP FairSkies Mayor Holvand, My family just bought a home in SW Minneapolis, blocks from Edina, and we have many reasons why we're unhappy with the increased plane noise. The first is our daughter's health. According to a study commissioned by Germany's Federal Environment Agency, living under a flight path can seriously damage your health. German researchers have discovered that people who are exposed to jet noise have a substantially increased risk of stroke, high blood pressure and heart disease. The second is the noise impacts being outside in our yard or at the park one block from our home. The plane noise is much worse than it ever has been so now we're impacted inside and out the home. The reason we moved to SW Minneapolis is because of the beautiful nature, the low crime rates, the good schools and the home values which have appreciated at a higher rate than average. Now with this increased plane noise we have a much noisier home inside and out and one that won't be appreciating at a good percentage because it's now a less desirable area. Lake Harriet will also feel the environmental strain of this proposal. We have an airport used by the state of Minnesota yet a high percentage of the flights are going over a very narrow corridor that happens to be a fully developed urban area. This will have a negative effect on the safety, health and livability of our neighborhoods. Please overturn the federal statute since the FAA is not subject to state laws. Thanks, Tim Tim Kresse I Senior National Underwriting Account Executive I American Public Media W 651.290.1521 1 C 612.702.1482 1 F 651.290.1149 480 Cedar Street I St. Paul, MN 55101 tkresse Cd)americanpublicmedia.org Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 10:43 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Growing Number of Americans Go Carless (CNBC Article) Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 A,- IbiunnoCa EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov -- ...For Living, Learning, Raisin.- Families & Doing; Business From: Andrew Brown [ma ilto :andrew.r. brown Cd)att.net] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 10:31 AM To: Sen. Melisa. Franzen (cbsenate.mn; sen.david.senjem(&senate.mn; rep. ron.erhardt(a)house.mn; rep.paul.thissen(cahouse.mn; Da)ton.Budget(astate.mn.us; Charlie.Zelle(&state.mn.us; Edina Mail; iacobsjeffrey @comcast.net; susan.haigh(abmetc.state.mn.us; steve .elkins(cbmetc. state. mn.us; James .brimeyer(a)metc. state. mn.us; dana .graharnOXi.northfield.mn.us; abrede(a)rochestermn.gov; rep. mike. beard() house.mn; rep.david.bly(a)house.mn; rep.kurt.daudt@) house. mn; rep.frank.hornstein(a)house.mn; rep.phyllis.kahn(o house.mn; rep.ann.lenczewski@) house, mn; rep. paul.rosenthalO)house.mn; rep. kurt.zellers(a) house. mn; sen.scott.dibble(cllsenate.mn; sen.jeff.haydenCa)senate.mn; sen.lyle.koenen(a)senate.mn; sen.iulie.rosen(absenate.mn; sen.katie.sieben(a)senate.mn; sen.dave.thompson(a)senate.mn; sen.kevin.dahle(a)senate.mn Cc: whitneyl(a)ticminnesota.org; Courtney Whited; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague0edinarealty.com; 3onibennettl2(a)comcast.net; swensonannl(&cimail.com; kpetersen(abzanassoc.com; autumn. lehrke(a)co.washington.mn.us; councilmembedenPaol.com; Janice .rettman(a)co.ramsey.mn.us; linda .higgins @co.hennepin.mn.us; mike.slavik(a)co.dakota.mn.us; ward5(a)ci.stpaul.mn.us; kfranke(O )stpaulpark.org; BHollenbeck @ci.hastings.mn.us; ikeller(&g usmarLcom; sg60000(abhotmail.com; Cam .GordonCa)ci.minneapolis.mn.us Subject: Growing Number of Americans Go Carless (CNBC Article) http://www.cnbc.com/id/100762511 The above article is for your information. It is even more important now that we invest heavily in Light Rail, Street Cars and Inter City Passenger Rail so we remain a competitive state where people want to live, work and learn. Do this to help generations of Minnesotans to come. Please take next year's legislative session to invest heavily in: SouthWest Light Rail Bottineau Light Rail Red Rock Rail (To Red Wing) Zip Rail (to Rochester) Northern Lights Express (to Duluth) Extend NorthStar Rail to St.Cloud and Beyond to Cabin Country Remove the Dan Patch Corridor Gag Rule Street Cars in Minneapolis, St.Paul, State Fair Grounds, & Inner Ring suburbs Thank you, Sincerely, Andy Brown 5512 Park Place Edina MN 55424 612- 220 -3045 $YTiUi Qrm.?Jny Go Go Page 1 of 4 I` LiBa THE #1 GROWTH STRATEGY O�tOn y 9 S a AIBD °r, m Bore AUTOMOBILES Hot Trend in Automobiles: Not Owning One Tee, Size Published: Friday, 24 May 2013 1 L',17 AM ET By, Paul Eisenslein. CNBC Conhi'-^.utor Reamim,md 43 Twitter " 23 Unkedln 8 Share _ - '�"•�!�!!!�1' Vfiether by choice or through financial reality, the percentage of American ,a households without a car has doubled over • - � the pall two decades ...and is now approaching 1 in 10. • - _ The impact of this Irend could be significant, especially when i! comes to alternatives to driving, such as (mr- sharing and mass transit, according to research by CNW Marketing. "While the recession was in large part responsible for the latest spurt, the trend was already clear," said CNVts research chief Art Spinella, "A growing number of Americans felt they didn't (teed or want a personal car." (Read More: Younger Americans: No House, No Car, Less Debt) According to CNV•J data, the number of U.S. households without a car stood at a modest 5.7 percent in 1991. Thal figure stayed relatively stable through the early part of the new millennium. But it has been increasing slowly since then. with a "rapid rise' beginning in 2007. By last year. the total number of carless households hit 9 3 percent]. (Read More From the Detroit Bureau: Sales Soaring, Detroit Makers Trim Summer Break to Boost Production} The new research is in line with a separate study released last week by the U.S. Public Research Interest Group. or PIRG, which declared that, "the driving boom is over" It noted a decline in the average household vehicle fleet, for one thing, and it found that millennial motorists are both waiting longer to get a driver's license than previous generations and clocking fever miles on the road. (Read More: Study Indicates That America's Driving Boom is Over! CNW, research found Ihat is not a phenomenon limited la just millennials. The trend. said Spinella. is parlieulany noticeable. among "moth youngest and oldest Americans." Where there's resurgent urbanization among U.S. youth, he pointed out, a growing number of the elderly have moved to retirement communities where owning a car is no longer a requirement for getting services, for example. That's a pariicularty notable shift for older baby boomers, a generation that defined America's "on the road" car culture. .,i ' ELTAti1 l MORL WORKSPACE. 1� WITH rC'ONOhn't' CONAFORT' a BEHIND THE WHEEL WITH PHIL LEBEAU • Testa Pays Off $465 Million DOE Loan, ?he cnmpanp aeca�^,e l ^e fill to repay money under Advanced T.echnoi.ngy -. Vehicle Manufacturing program. Lutz Sees Stripped Down Fisker as Ip Potential Gem Bob Lutz is teatvng up with Wanxiang Group. a Chinese auto parts supplier, in a bid to buy the ailing Fisher r Mercedes S- Class: Ups Tech and ME;::— Luxury {� Mercedes -Benz is digging in and Putting mere leau:res into its redesigned llagsnia S -Class sedan. TOP NEWS AND ANALYSIS, Immigration Bill 'Could Create DMZ_' Likc Korea Fed's Bullard Wants Faster inflation Before Tapering OE Mom Homeowners Become Accidental Landlords Watching for Signs of a Too - Strong US Economy Finally, Clarity From the Fed! Or Maybe Not ... CNBC DISRUPTOR 50 INNOVATORS, Busting the Telecom Monopoly. With a 59•Ccnl APP 5e 7isruptor Companies Changing the Rusinees ;world New York's 11 Largest venture- Backed Exits Tecnology Companies Down- Shilbng Road Rage The Faeebook Money Mall Street Docsn't Want MOST POPULAR STORIES, Early Movers: ANF, PG. FL, P, SHLD & More Despite Overseas Weakness, US Durable Goods Rise Immigration Bill 'Could Create DMZ_' L. ike Karea_ Truck Strike May Have Caused Wash. Bridge Collapse Have You Seen Kmart's New Ad? It's a Gasl http : / /www.cnbc.com /id/100762511 5/24/2013 0 Page 2 of 4 iMow From the Detroit Bureau: Chevy's New Spark Battery Car WIII Cost Under MOST POPULAR VIDEO', $20k) Are Currency Wars a Concern? Larry Bossidy on Immigration Reform LrJthotil a sudden reversal. the trendline suggests that the number of carless Fed's Tapering Could Be Very Slow: Bullard households could reach 10 percent this year or soon afterward. The question is Euro 2one'More Stable' Than a Year Ago: Dmghi whether the trend is going to continue indefinitely. As the recession clearly has been Retail's Winners, Losers to Watch: Pro a factor in the shift, the economic recovery could lead at least some carless households to add •.wheels. -But various studies suggest there are other factors at sponsored Links work and that there may never be a return to the high level of households with cars LifeLock k Official Site seen as recently as the 1990s. Protect your Identity with Life Lock Ultimate- Today. The impact is likely la be fell in a number of ways. . While the. U.S. new Car market is after its worst drnvn.lum since the Great Truth About Annuities ?' Don't Buy Any Annuity Until You Watch This Special viaeo Depression, few: people expect demand to reach the more than 17 indlion peak seen Report! - during past recoveries. the of no- vehicle households rises. CNW forecasts the aulo industry (1200 %) Stocks? And as number Will This $0.50 Stock Hit $0.00? Wit $10,000 Turn into may be forced to shift more vehicles into fleets. whether commercial, government or $120,0007 MvM. billionairertncks. ram . even the fast - growing list of car- sharing services. Buy a link here (More From the Detroit Bureau: Driverless Cars Draw Strong Public Interest) "While the full impact of these trends are years away, we can see the formation of a future that includes more car - sharing, increased use of public transportation and diminishing status of owning a new vehicle. • said Spinella. "Again. this is years away - -- perhaps a decade -- -but the shift is clearly taking root.- ,,. By CNBC ContabulorPaul Eisenstein, Foltoa• him on Twitter @DeiroitBureau krx.om ;need 43 'rwitte; 44 •.1 Lulkedln 8 Share Print Email RELATED America's Driving [loom Is Over: Study Unlike Boomers, Younger Americans Scale Back Debt 10 Cl:rslc Piuscle Cars Automobiles F C orlomy US: NoWa 7 "rarsprnalion Sponsored Links DSS (NYSE MKT) The Next Big Patent Stockl www.P.edChir, com LifeLock,1D Official Site Protect your Identity with UfeLock Ultirrete"r Today. LifeLur;k.com Billionaire Battle! Which billionaire will win this fight? htto' %lcuro +:CrldnE�n ^.: cam''5]7r Buy a link hors COMMENTS 5 i:rmin -nr . lmai iavfa I M ry 24. 2013 0834 FM E'l _ My employer supplies mine. otherwise I .would be driving a bomb. Aulomobiies are one of the largest drains on personal income, College is the other. ,. F.epert Airui - asisaid I May 24, 2013 DB:38 AM ET olt yeah :well awen saw a pig droving a rah on Iv 5/24/2013 http://www.cnbc.com/id/100762511 Page 3 of 4 juDiamond I May 24. 2013 09'.02 ALM E T Instead cA wrapping a fancy care around a fal 255 how bout losing weight? n Report Abuse Radfcal_t I May 24. 2013 09:22 AM E'.T Maybe it has something to do with that 202.1%jump in prices for both new and used that they've laLen in the last few years. But just remember, (here is NO INFLATION!!! ' :Report.- l:usr; Zachlp2010 I May 24. 2013 09:40 AIA ET Having lived in America for long enough. I would find :t very hard to believe that you could make it in this country without a ear. Simply job opportunities are spread out within 100's- 1000'5 of square miles wihin eaCh nlegaregl -n. This may have more to do with people living O.Ser to urban centers., the development of more mass transit options, and the amount of people out of work and on disabllityirelired then anything else _ v R.:;p.n A.....r_ NoKoolaid4MeTks i May 24, 2013 09.40 AM ET Dowt V` /,rrr. •Jbama is working on :hiS you wit: score gel a Tree car vmh your Obama Cer f >nr..ne' Ghost_ of Xmas-_Future I May 24, 2013 10:04 AM ET Cars are a ripoff. plain and simple. If people can make this work its great, v\rllh Obama's economy' producing nothing but low end retail jobs, and everybody's savings getting destroyed by zero interest rates and runaway food, fuel prices, this makes sense. Live in urban areas near shopping and work, lake public transportation, walk or bike. You'll save money and probably bum calories also. n Report Abuse Shellgame I May 24, 2013 1018 AM ET Look for.lhis to continue and increase. America is becoming a 2nd world country and we have our govemmein our voting record, and pur corporations for this problem. F,na'ly we ses that everything does nrrt grow on trees. and someone actually needs, to go 9Ui and wort,, som =one needs is +aks responsibility for their own. hea'thcarr;, emnioyment, retirement, and sufvivai digital24 1 flay 24. 201.1 10.22 AM El' More people live in urban, areas. for which you do not need a car, The most fierce I ?altlegmund for car sharing in Europe Is Munich, home to BMIN It is also not a coincidence that Munich has one of the highest rases of people using bicycles to get around tow". 11 costs 75.100 Euros per monl "n to rent a car space in an apartment building. Then you pay at least $5 per hour if you want to park the ca r while shopping in the city center. Gasoline costs are high. Finally . people are not earning anough to pay, Adios cars The, next Irontier is e10,1rle HC'yTJ0S WIlich allow VOL] to arrive at work wilho:ll having broken a sweat . Report Ah: ; tpnI i SAay 24. 201' 10'.9_4 AM ET the hem ,s inn2ti.-,.. 1e1eS1 ;.' o inflation c :Ome : : : :ul'r. 22` !n'en ve.srs I betw:•e that car r, e.Gin(latin . hart r., -i r—f rJ Il?- years aql, rio trans .r: lit^ a::unVy WC IJ!d g,:e a car loan Ir,r nv— titan 3Pr rnhmht dart !tail• slave:t rri ;,re aff."'na ' e'en wild aim,e average inllaaol\ PCL' ±9; 5!• ;hc eHl ipalr5 nbv, bai;n 0—nded Out In ; ;' mdllin S. But tt:al le'alry fulls whin you w'aril tL IrarJC yc'Jf car in, Before a person would have equity w•heil they traded in their vehidc. new they ore underwater. And you know Inat most of that price goes m paying the interest on all the bonds that the mismanaged auto manufacturers have accumulated. Report Abuse MORE COMMENTS 1 12 Next I Las! w ADD COMMENTS plea sr, Sign 1'i or Ragisw, to participalo _ Your Conirnerits itlp Io 1100 ,harar:Iers'i, http: / /www.cnbc.com/id/100762511 5/24/2013 X�14 el 160A /?Z" Z- 7�6 �` Gk� � ✓��'_ to �z� arN 77- s, j� Ito (ze ZoP� 4- ` jam✓ L��� 1 � ,Z2 1600 HOPKINS CROSSROAD MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 553°5 -2026 952-358 -5177 September 20, 2011 RESENT November 7, 2011_ cY �� Dear Nancy, On behalf of The Waters Senior Living, I'd like to thank you for your continued interest in The Waters of Edina, the planned senior living community adjacent to the Colonial Church of Edina. I am excited to share with you an update on the building's progress. Thanks to your support, we recently received all necessary city approvals and are now in the process of finalizing funding and placing the finishing touches on architectural plans. From the positive feedback we've received, we are confident that the remaining phases of the development process will go smoothly. Construction is anticipated to begin in the spring/summer of 2012 with a grand opening in 2013. Once a look forty d to welcoming you as one of the first residents of the premier the building is completed, senior living destination in the Twin Cities. As a reminder, I've included some highlights of the "gracious living and genuine caring" The Waters of Edina will offer: • A gorgeous senior living campus designed to complement its neighboring landmark, the Colonial Church of Edina • Outdoor areas that include fountains, waterfalls, extensive landscaping, and walking trails • Spacious floor plans that include upscale finishes, nine -foot ceilings, upgraded kitchen features, walk -in closets, high speed internet, individually controlled heating and cooling systems, and 24 -hour security systems • A strong focus on wellness with features such as a therapy pool, spa area, exercise room and community room/chapel • Round - the -clock health and personal services if needed, all in one location • A variety. of wellness programs, spiritual services, social activities and dining options in areas such Mthe bistro, restaurant, theater room, game room, library raft room, and parlor , c We will let you know as soon as pricing plans and housing applications are available. We will provide another update during the 2011 holiday season. If you have any questions, please call 952-358-5177. We hope you have an enjoyable autumn! Sincerely, Jay Jensen�j The Waters Senior Living Dn Clime ` r C� Do a'A_1� www.TheWaters5eniorUving.com Susan Howl Hello MN SRTS coalition- - Congratulations! The Minnesota Safe Routes to School program was funded at $500,000 per biennium! This money is in the base funding for the Minnesota Department of Transportation which means it will be continued into future biennia. This is the first -ever commitment in the state transportation budget to ensure that our children are given the opportunity.to safely walk and bike to school. This funding will help communities plan SRTS programs, provide training for staff and volunteers to support SRTS, and other non - infrastructure costs that are crucial to a successful SRTS program. This funding will be awarded on a competitive basis to schools across Minnesota. Already Thinking Ahead to Next Year—While we had requested a total of $16 million in bonding dollars (($12.8M infrastructure) and general fund ($3.2M non - infrastructure) for SRTS; we were,pleas'ed that the Legislature supported this out of all the competing priorities for transportation dollars. We have a strong foothold in the bonding bill for next year. The House, Senate and Governor had agreed upon an $800 million bonding package that included $2 million for SRTS. That bill went to the House floor late last week and unfortunately fell short of the super majority vote needed to pass a bonding bill. (They were short just 5 votes.) This required the Capital Investment Chairs; leadership and the governor to go back to the drawing board and ultimately they crafted a greatly scaled back bonding bill at $176 million that included Capitol building renovations and a handful of other urgent projects which did garner the super majority to pass..The big take -away for next year: we know there is support for SRTS in next year's bonding bill (evidenced by the fact it was included in the original House /Senate /Gov agreement on bonding). However, we cannot rest on our laurels. We will need to be sure that SRTS projects are included in the tours that the Capital Investment Committees will be taking over the next year. We need to keep our coalition active to make sure legislators hear us. And we must continue to trumpet the successes and the need for more resources in Minnesota for SRTS. Thank you for your help in achieving this tremendous success! We again made a strong showing at the Capitol for SRTS as a coalition. Thanks to the Minnesota Bicycle Alliance for co- leading this effort with American Heart Association. Thanks to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota for their invaluable contribution to this effort- thanks to Jill Chamberlain and Monica Dionne for providing the local projects at the district level for legislators. This was an incredible asset to provide to legislators who know all politics is local. Thanks to BCBS —MN for giving us time with their rock star communications expert, Steve Kinsella. Steve quickly identified opportunities to spread the word about SRTS throughout the process and was instrumental in creating the video that helped kick the campaign off. These assets brought by BCBS -MN in research and communications made a tremendous difference for those of us at the Capitol -it freed us up to concentrate on lobbying and it provided some of the most persuasive information we could share with legislators. Thanks to Transit for Livable Communities and Fresh Energy for their advice and support for the SRTS coalition— particularly for those of us new to lobbying on transportation issues. Thanks to Mission: Readiness and Major General Rodney Hannula (ret.) for communicating your perspective on national security and childhood obesity to lawmakers. It was a timely and persuasive message! And thanks to American Cancer Society for doing a lot of heavy lifting on lobbying legislators. I know I left off key stakeholders and individuals —but please know that this effort was truly a team effort and would not have been possible without the contributions of the entire coalition. Thank you for your role in this success. Next Steps: Please reach out to the following legislators and thank.the.m for their support of SRTS this year: Sen. Transp. Chair.Scott Dibble sen.scott.dibble @ senate.mn House Transp. Chair Frank Hornstein rep.f rank. hornstein @house.mn House Capital Investment Chair Alice Hausman rep.a lice. hausman @house.mn House chief author of SRTS Rep. Melissa Hortman rep.melissa.hortman @ house.mn Senate chief author of SRTS Sen. Melisa Franzen sen.melisa.franzen @ senate.mn Thanks again! It is a pleasure to work with such a committed group of advocates! Rachel Callanan, JD MNM Regional Vice President of Advocacy, Minnesota & Wisconsin American, Heart Association, Midwest Affiliate w TO: CITY OF EDINA - CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: 6566 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH, CONDO # 47.� Owner DATE: MAY 15, 2014 RE: PROPOSED BUILDING AT 6500 FRANCE AVENUE It is my position that the proposed building at 6500 France Avenue is too large for the space. The new proposal asks for a Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 2.1% which is twice that allowed by the zoning ordinance. Also the site density requested by the developers is 88 units /acre. Similar senior housing developments in Edina are between 34 and 42 units /acre. I am not opposed to a senior housing project, however, it should be built within the rules of the city ordinances. - Vo kK�+✓ Owner's Name - Signature LeJ fij 8 Edina un Current Current.mnsun.com Thursday, May 16, 2013 How passes anti - bullying bill after Wgislators recallmwsonal eApAi To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: June 4, 2013 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS owe 1` ch �y • ,�roRPORA�9 • lass Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Requested: Attached is correspondence received after the packets were delivered to you. No action is necessary. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 W Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information X❑ Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:11 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FVV: The City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 " i 3, Ibiunno0EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN,gov ...For Living, Learning, Raring Families S& Doing Bu,iness From: WESTERDAHL WILLIAM [mailto:westyw2Cabgmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: The City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan 5/30/13 Dear Mayor Hovland, In 2007 Edina adopted "The City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan" Since 2007 there have been a number of significant events which will impact the use of bicycles for transportation in Edina. Among these are: The designation of OPUS and CITY WEST as stations on the Southwest Light rail line. Both of these stations are likely to draw significant numbers of bicycle commuters , are within one half mile of Edina's west boundary, and will likely be used by Edina residents. The establishment of a west campus for United Health Care at the SE intersection of Shady Oak Road and the Crosstown highway. According to some newspaper articles, approximately 6700 employees are to be located on this campus. This campus is 3/4 mile from Edina's west boundary an will likely be used by Edina bicycle commuters. The adoption of a creek route for the "Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail" through Edina to be constructed by the Three Rivers Park District. This trail is likely to be primarily for recreation, not transportation, unplowed during the winter, unlighted, and having limited access as it passes through the Nine Mile Creek wetlands. My questions arc: Is the "The City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan" still operative? Who is responsible for monitoring/implementing the 2007 plan? Are there plans to modify the 2007 plan to include the effect of the Southwest Rail Stations, the new United Health Care Campus, and the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail? Sincerely, Wm Westerdahl vvestyw2rgmail.com. J June 3, 2013 Edina City Council West 50m Street Edina, MN Re: GrandView Process Dear City Council Members: CC: Edina City Manager Scott Neal, Edina City Economic Development Director Bill Neuendorf As a follow -up to my letter dated April 17, 2013, I am enclosing an article from yesterday's NY Times: " A Streetcomer Serenade for the Public Plaza ". I would ask you to pay particular attention to the point that cities leaving public redevelopment to private developers end up with public spaces that are unusable afterthoughts, not the vibrant life - filled, connected places envisioned by the Framework. The article also mentions the Hayes Valley neighborhood in San Francisco. In my 4/13 letter, I referenced examples of public spaces spurring private redevelopment and provided the links. Hayes Street was one. Church Street in Burlington, Vermont was another. The Framework always used the Montreal Town Green as an example on which members of the Steering Committee all agreed. The process as it has been designed going forward gets it backwards. It asks developers to define the land use before public spaces are defined. I would ask the Council, Manager Neal and City Economic Development Director Neuendorf to spend time with the following: Gil Penalosa's TED Talk: htW: / /tedxtalks ted com/video/TEDxCarlton-Gil- Penalosa- Creati Dan Burden's Walkable Communities: http: / /www.waMive.org These two embody the spirit and intent of the Framework. They demonstrate how public decisions regarding land use create the type of spaces our 2 -year process laid forth. I would ask, once more, for the Council to define a process that honors the Framework and would be pleased to discuss my thoughts at your convenience. Repec y, Kim Montgomery A Prescription for Plazas and Public Spaces - NYTimes.com i HOME PAGE I TODAY'S PAPER VIDEO i MOST POPULAR U.S. Edition S c�hc lctu fork �>tmcs Art & Design WORLD U.S. N.Y. / REGION BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY SCIENCE HEALTH SPORTS OPINION E ART S DESIGN BOOKS DANCE MOVIES MUSIC TELEVISION THEATER a A Streetcorner Serenade for the Public Plaza iii? ii (i [II 1]fG i31 _ .._ s- _A The New York City Department of Transportation Left, Pearl Street Triangle in Dumbo, Brooklyn, as k previously existed as a parking site and, right, as the city's Department of Transportation remade it in a renovation plan. More Photos a By MICHAEL KIMMELMAN Published: May 31, 2013 62 Comments In Brooklyn, the No. 3 subway line ends at New Lots Avenue, where FACEBOOK passengers descend from the elevated tracks to what used to be a TWITTER nasty intersection, trafficked by prostitutes, drug dealers — "You GOOGLE+ name it," as Eddie Di Benedetto, the owner of Caterina's Pizzeria, put it the other day. Not long ago, a coalition of local merchants and SAVE community leaders turned to the New York City Department of E -MAIL Transportation, which runs a program to make traffic circles, SHARE triangles and streets into pedestrian plazas. PRINT The department brought in some REPRINTS Multimedia potted trees and chairs, closed off a short street and voila, what had been a , problem became a boon. Since the plaza opened last summer, crime has plummeted, Mr. Di Benedetto told me, crediting the local police precinct. He heads the New Lots Avenue Triangle Merchants Association. http:/ /www.nytimes.com /2013 /06/02 /arts /design /a- prescription- for - plazas- and - public- spaces.htmI ?pagt A Prescription for Plazas and Public Spaces - NYTimes.com ,� "People use the place all the time now, meaning the area is watched and safe," he said. "I've had my pizzeria since 1971, ` °r ' so I can tell you, this is a renaissance." i Cities need publi A sortable calendar of noteworthy like that at New Lots. cultural events in the New York c spaces like plazas. For years they have I srkde show mostly been planned from the top down. In New York, D.I.Y.-Style Public spaces zoning laws have carved many of these spaces from commercial developments, which have been given bonuses d Readers' Comments to include them. Mayor Bloomberg is pushing a new Connect With proposal to rezone east Midtown, near Grand Central, that Us on Twitter Follow is a variation on this same old trickle -down theme. @nytimesarts for t arts and Arts But fresh thinking has focused on cheap, quick, temporary t entertainment and D.I.Y. -style approaches to creating public space — news. Arts Twitter List: Critics, Reporters among these, curbside "parklets" in San Francisco and a and Editors communal farm on what had been a derelict parcel in the middle of Phoenix. "Small steps, big changes," as Janette Arts Sadik -Khan, the New York City Department of Entertainment Guide Transportation commissioner, described the logic of plazas A sortable calendar of noteworthy like that at New Lots. cultural events in the New York region, selected by Times critics. And guess what? A beer garden made out of freight Go to Event Listings n containers on an Empry plot tarns out to be a lot more popular and better for a city than a sad corporate atrium Readers' Comments with a few cafe tables and a long list of don'ts on the wall. Tell us about your favorite public plaza. As more and more educated Americans, especially younger Read All Comments (62) a ones, are looking to move downtown, seeking alternatives to suburbs and cars, they're reframing the demand for public space. They want elbow room and creative sites, cooked up by the community or, like the plaza program, developed from a democratic mix of top -down and bottom -up governance. The other day I visited Michael Bierut, whose design firm, Pentagram, has drawn the maps that accompany the new bike -share program. Pentagram's New York office faces Madison Square Park. Mr. Bierut remembered when the plaza program started to take over the pedestrian - unfriendly territory where Broadway crosses Fifth Avenue, just next to the park. Traffic patterns improved, but he still thought the city was nuts to create plazas from concrete islands marooned between busy boulevards when there was already, right there, one of the most gorgeous parks in the city. "Was I wrong," he said, laughing. The plazas outside his building are mobbed on warm days, with people even toting Shake Shack burgers out of the park to sit next to all the traffic — partly for the view (the Flatiron building one way, the Empire State Building the other) but also for the reason people gravitate to Trafalgar Square in London or the Piazza del Campo in Siena, Italy. To be in the middle of things. "It's why we congregate near the kitchen at a dinner party instead of in the living room," said Andy Wiley- Schwartz, who directs the Department of Transportation's plaza program "That's where you see people coming and going to the fridge to grab a beer and watch stuff happen." http:/ /www.nytlmes.com /2013 /06/02 /arts /design /a- prescription- for - plazas- and - public- spaces.htmPpag A Prescription for Plazas and Public Spaces - NYTlmes.com Nationwide, people moving downtown want to be in on the mix, too; they want pedestrian - friendly streets, parks and plazas. And smart cities are responding, like Dallas, whose Klyde Warren Park opened downtown last year atop the Woodall Rodgers Freeway, where it burrows for a few merciful blocks below ground. The place was buzzing when I passed by one recent weekend. In Phoenix, where nearly half of all city lots are vacant, the mayor, Greg Stanton, lately chose an empty 15 -acre parcel — an eyesore in the heart of town — for an urban park and garden where nearby residents, mostly immigrants, can grow vegetables, for their own tables or to sell at local farmers' markets. And in San Francisco, the city government has been renting out curbside parking spaces, long term, on the condition they be turned into parklets. Most involve little more than benches and shrubs. But the best have become elaborate interventions, with landscaping, platforms, even mini -mini -golf. I spent a morning watching kids play and adults sunbathe in a parklet outside Fourbarrel Coffee on Valencia Street Los Angeles and Philadelphia, among others, have recently started parklet programs. New York is trying it out, too. In the Hayes Valley neighborhood of San Francisco, I also came across a project called Proxy, which recovers the land left behind where a highway had been. After the Central Freeway was taken down, residents petitioned the mayor to do something with a few of the vacant lots it left behind. Douglas Burnham, a local architect who runs the firm Envelope A +D, proposed Proxy: a shifting, temporary campus of modified shipping containers hosting retailers, art galleries and cafes. Crowds flock to hang out at the Suppenkuche's Biergarten, a scene at night The architecture is simple. The vibe is friendly. The changing layout conforms to a neighborhood in flux. Local merchants feared Proxy would steal customers away. Instead, it has brought people to the neighborhood. Back east, retailers in Times Square saw a similar influx after the plaza program closed Broadway to cars. Carmageddon didn't happen; business boomed. Commercial rents in Times Square have doubled during the last year alone. All these New York plaza projects haven't come up roses. Neighborhoods mostly request plazas with an agreement to look after them; poorer communities, without Business Improvement Districts, have sometimes had trouble with the maintenance. To aid them, Ms. Sadik -Khan said, the Transportation Department is working with the Horticultural Society of New York and the nonprofit ACE Programs for the Homeless to develop a jobs initiative in which ex- convicts and homeless people provide horticultural services and general upkeep. Communities pay on a sliding scale for the help. It remains to be seen if it delivers. The process of construction is that the department first lays out the plazas (Pearl Street in the Dumbo area of Brooklyn, for example) with temporary materials.'Ihen the city's Department of Design and Construction takes over, as do outside architects, including . well-known and young firms like Snohetta (Times Square), RBA GROUP and DSGN AGNC (Corona, Queens) to consult with local representatives on the final results. Not surprisingly, bottom -up design usually works better than trickle -down. That east Midtown rezoning plan I mentioned, which the Bloomberg administration is trying to ram through the City Council before the mayor's term expires, would be a bonanza for commercial developers who want to erect giant office towers on Park Avenue and around Grand Central Station. But even as it portends to radically reshape the neighborhood, it treats the public realm (mass transit as well) as an afterthought NewYorkPass.00m Turks & Caicos Packages All Inclusive Turks & Caicos Deals: 7 -Night from only $849 per person ClubMed.usfTurks +end +caioos 6/3/13 11:01 AM" http: / /www.nytimes.com/ 2013 /06/02 /arts /design /a- prescription- for - plazas- and - public- spaces.htmPpagewanted= all &_r =0 Page 3 of 5 , __ -: :. e __ _ A Prescription for Plazas and Public Spaces - NYTimes.com 6/3/13 11:01 AM 1 There's a half -baked idea to transform some of Vanderbilt Avenue into a pedestrian street and a plan for public space being drawn up with consultants. In return for the right to extra big building's, developers would contribute to a city-run fund that, someday, .c act on that plan. It remains a backward approach to addressing public needs. Weave seen, what happens the old way. During the early 1960s, zoning codes in New York created privately `owned public_ spaces, or POPS. There are now more than 500 of these plazas, arcades and atriums — spaces that often nobody wanted, least of all the developers who built them in exchange for gaining minions of extra square feet and,other valuable zoning concessions. I spent a, day last month touring sites with Jerold Kayden, an urban planner and Harvard professor.: The city Planning Commission has tried in recent years to improve standards and upgrade ,.certain locations, working with outsiders in some cases. Mr. Kayden took me to whathad been an especially grim atrium near 62nd Street and Broadway that, with Lincoln Center's patronage, has been turned into the David Rubenstein Atrium, expertly redesigned by Tod Williams and Billie Tsien. There are regular concerts and cafe tables . next.to gadget- charging outlets. I chatted with four women running a small dance company in Inwood who meet there every week for the usual reason: to feel in the middle of things, they said. These public spaces more or less operate on the honor system, so owners take advantage. At Trump Tower, public benches that the building is obliged to provide have been replaced by a sales counter hawking Trump merchandise, and there was no furniture, though . promised, on the public terraces. J. P. Morgan Chase, which owns 383 Madison Avenue, has blocked off a lobby that is a public through -space, claiming security con erns. Guards shooed me out the door when I asked whether the building's owners had obtained wssion from the city. Since Occupy Wall Street took over Zuccotti Park, another POPS, owners have drawn up ever more restrictive lists of rules. At 120 Park Avenue; across from Grand Central (years ago the Whitney Museum had a branch there; now it's desolate), a guard stopped me from taking a photograph; at 590 Madison Avenue, formerly the IBM Building, the nicest of the indoor sites, you can't play cards. New Yorkers deserve better, and have paid for it As with the rest of the public realm, the priority ought to be public service. Ms. Sadik -Khan is right: Improving public space doesn't always take much. It's good for business. It's good for people. It's common sense. This article'has been revised to reflect thefollowing correction: Cormctlon: JUne 2,2013 Two captions this weekend with an article about D.I.Y. -style public spaces describe incorrectly the Pearl Street Triangle shown in Dumbo, Brooklyn. The photograph of a parking lot shows what the triangle used to look like — not its current state. And a photo illustration shows the triangle's renovations; Pearl Street Triangle is not awaiting renovation. A version of this article appeared in print on June 2, 2013, on page AR1 of the New York edition with the headline: A ^' etcomer Serenade for the Public Plaza. SAVE E -MAIL SHARE http: / /www.nytimes.com/ 2013 /06/02/ arts / design /a- prescription- for - plazas- and - public- spaces.htrhPpagewanted =all &_r =0 Page 4 of 5 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS May 8, 2013 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Scherer, Potts Carpenter, Kilberg, Cherkassky, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Grabiel, Staunton Absent from Roll: Schroeder III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Potts moved approval of the April 24, 2013 meeting agenda. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Potts moved approval of the February 27, 2013 meeting minutes. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Planning Commission will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members. to respond to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. No public comment. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Variance. Roy Lecy. 6905 Valley View Road, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property is located on the south side of Valley View Road consisting of a rambler with a tuck -under two car garage built in 1955. The lot is 26,634 square Page 1 of 14 feet in area with existing lot coverage of 6.6 %. The owners are hoping to tear down the existing structure and replace it with a rambler with an attached three car garage. The owners would like to locate the new home near the existing front yard setback. Planner Aaker explained that the current home is located 29.7 feet from the front lot line. The zoning ordinance requires that the new home maintain the average front yard setback of the homes on either side. The home to the east is located 29.7 feet from Valley View Road right -of -way and the home to the west is located 308 feet from Valley View resulting in an average front yard setback for the property of 168.85 feet. The new home will be setback from the front lot line approximately 34.89 feet, which is a greater distance from the front lot line than the existing home. The front west corner of the new home will be the closest building point to the street with the remainder of the front fagade angled away from Valley View and farther from the front lot line than the existing home The new home is proposed to be a walk -out with back yard views angled towards a pond located west of the property. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variance based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a) The practical difficult is caused by the location of the home to the west that is actually located south of the subject property's rear lot line. b) The encroachment into the setback improves upon an existing nonconforming setback that was established when the original home was built in 1955 and was conforming at that time. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following condition: 1. The-home must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped, March 29, 2013. Appearing for the Applicant Roy Lecy, builder and Jim and Deb Ryman property owners. Applicant Presentation Roy Lecy addressed the Commission and explained that he along with the property owners worked with the adjacent neighbors fronting Mark Terrace Drive on "tweaking" the location of the new home to afford those neighbors better views. Mr. Lecy said he believes the revisions are acceptable to those neighbors. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Page 2 of 14 Public Hearine Peter Sussman, 6904 Mark Terrace Drive, addressed the Commission and informed them the property owners and builder were very helpful during this process. Concluding, Sussman said he was pleased with the outcome; the revisions are acceptable. Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Carpenter said he believes the variance is justified and commended all parties on working together to achieve an acceptable outcome. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. Variance. Chris Drazan. 5501 Lakeview Drive, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property is a corner lot located south and east of Lakeview Drive. The property owner is proposing to build a new home that will conform to all of the ordinance requirements with the exception of the required setbacks from Lakeview Drive. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following; with the exception of the front yard setback variance all standards and ordinances are met; the proposed use of the property is reasonable because it will uphold the established front setback pattern already existing on the block and the practical difficulty is complying with the deep front yard setbacks and the angle of the east lot line. Approval is, also subject to the plans presented Appearing for the Applicant Doug Johnson, Builder Page 3 of 14 Applicant Presentation Mr. Johnson explained that Mr. Drazan could not be present this evening, adding Mr. Drazan informed him he spoke with neighbors; however, he was not made aware of what was discussed. Public Comment. Margaret Shaw, 4611 Lakeview Dirve expressed concerns. Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel said in his opinion this is more of a "McMansion" issue. He pointed out the proposed house is twice as large as the existing house. Grabiel acknowledged that except for the front yard setback variance the rest of the house meets code; however, it is also possible more could be done to mitigate the impact of the new house from the adjoining neighbor. A discussion ensued on the rationale of shifting the house with the observation made that shifting the house could also create other issues for the neighbor. Commissioner Forrest commented that in her opinion this is a catch -22, adding in a sense the Commission must do a balancing act. Forrest said one comment she has is that the garage wall is too "blank ", adding something needs to be done to soften its impact. Forrest acknowledged regardless of what happens the new house will be a change to the neighbor. Chair Staunton said in his opinion the practical difficulty in this instance is that the subject lot must maintain two front yard setbacks. Most lots are required to meet one front yard setback; not two. Motion Commissioner Potts moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. Ayes; Potts, Platteter, Carr, Staunton. Nay; Grabiel, Carpenter, Forrest. Motion carried. C. Conditional Use Permit with Variances. Christian Dean. 6612 Indian Hills Road, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the property owner, Malcom Liepke, is proposing to tear down the existing multi -level house built in 1953 and construct a new home at 6612 Indian Hills Road. The lot Mr. Liepke owns to the east, at 6608 Indian Hills Road will remain vacant. Aaker noted the property is a corner lot located north of Indian Hills Road and east of Indian Hills Circle. The property backs up to Page 4 of 14 Arrowhead Lake. The existing home on site is a multi -level home that has had a series of additions over the years that resulted in a split /multi -level condition. Planner Aaker explained that the new home would have a flat roof and will be contemporary in design. The proposed new home is predominantly a single story walk -out with a second floor in -set from the front walls of the home and occupying approximately 30% of the overall house length. The architect has indicated that the over -all design goal is to create a low, horizontal structure hugging the rolling landscape with portions of the structure imbedded into the topography of the site. The strategy is to be respectful of existing grades, low profile and organic. The garage would be accessed from Indian Head Circle and will be partially sub -grade with a roof garden above at entry level. Planner Aaker reported that the applicant also owns a lot to the east at 6608 Indian Hills Road which is subject to a Restrictive Covenant recorded with the County by a previous owner which prohibits the erection of any building, dwelling or other permanent structure on the lot. The lot to the east also had a Conservation Restriction imposed upon it when approved for subdivision by the City in 1984. As part of subdivision the City imposed Conservation Easement upland from the Lake edge. The owner's vacant lot at 6608 Indian Hills Road will remain undeveloped between the new home and the neighboring home to the east. Planner - Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit with Variance and the setback Variances for property located at 6612 Indian Hills Road. The Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation 2.8 feet above the one foot first floor increase of the existing home. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance Section 850.04, Subd E. 2. The proposal will keep the new first floor at approximately the same height as the existing main level of the home. 3. The proposed home is in character within this neighborhood. There are a variety of housing styles throughout the Indian Hills neighborhood. There have been a number of properties that have had homes re -built on them that are of similar or are larger in size, mass and scale. 4. The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The improvements would provide a reasonable use of a corner lot subjected to two front yard setbacks. The proposed home would uphold the established front setback pattern already existing on the block with only minor point intrusions. The setbacks proposed from Arrowhead Lake include would be 6 inches farther back form the Lake edge than the existing home. Because of the angle of setback from the Lake, only a triangular portion of the terrace extends beyond the setback of the existing home. b. The setbacks from Indian Hills Road are for minor point intrusions of the at -grade terrace and a subgrade garage. Both intrusions are small triangular over -laps into the setback. C. The home is appropriate in size and scale for the 49,079 square foot lot. The home is designed to be low profile and to fit within the existing topography. The neighbor to the east has a "no build" lot between their lot and the new home limiting impact to the east. Page 5 of 14 d.' The practical difficulties include the steep slopes on the lot, the irregular shape of the lot, and the required setbacks based on the adjacent home which has an 80 -foot front yard setback, and the 75 foot setback required from Arrowhead Lake. e. This lot is subjected to much deeper setbacks than a typical single dwelling lot. f. The first floor is defined by the entry level of a multi -level home instead of defined by the existing main floor of the current home. g. The purpose behind the ordinance is to maintain an established front yard sight line and street scape and to maintain adequate distance from water bodies. The ordinance is meant to prevent a continual erosion of both of those setback standards. The front yard setback over -laps are minor point intrusions that do not affect adjacent properties. Duplicating the Lake setback of the existing home would not compromise the intent of the ordinance to provide spacing from a natural resource. The new home is low profile with a flat roof and would be elevated above the Lake. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance in terms of the house location, mass and over -all height with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Survey date stamped: April 24, 2013 • Building plans/ elevations date stamped: April 24, 2013. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. The execution and recording of a Conservation Easement 41 feet upland from the Ordinary High Water level of Arrowhead Lake. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. & Mrs. Liepke and Christian Dean, Architect Discussion Commissioner Carpenter asked for clarification on the Conditional Use Permit process and if this process was the result of a problem a previous resident had with ground water? Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative, adding this process was recently developed to respond to a change in variance criteria. Commissioner Grabiel asked if Arrowhead Lake has a public access point. Aaker responded that she doesn't believe so. Applicant Presentation Mr. Dean addressed the Commission and with the aid of graphics indicated their intent was to Page 6 of 14 design a low slung house while making every effort to tie the house in with the topography. Dean added the house is modern with an organic design that is very sensitive to the natural topography. Discussion Commissioner Platteter expressed concern about the variance from the lake and how important it is to maintain that setback. Commissioner Forrest commented that she respects the design of the new house; however is also concerned with the setback from the lake. Public Hearine Harry Joslyn, 6718 Indian Hills Road, Edina, MN David Swendsen, 6616 Pawnee Road, Edina, MN Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Grabiel commented that it appears the DNR created a requirement that's "one size fits all ", pointing out City Ordinance allows the City to grant variances from the DNR restrictions. Grabiel pointed out Edina is an urban area and there are many properties in Edina that do not meet the DNR mandated setbacks. Planner Aaker agreed adding the previous setback from water bodies was 25 -feet. Chair Staunton asked why Arrowhead is required to maintain a greater setback from water bodies than the standard DNR established at 50 -feet. Planner Teague responded based on environmental conditions the DNR established a 75 -foot setback from Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, and Lake Cornelia and Mirror Lake. Commissioner Forrest said she is having difficulty in finding practical difficulties to support the setback variance from the lake; especially for the terrace /deck. She added she also struggles with the Conditional Use pointing out this request doesn't meet conditions one through three. Chair Staunton said he's a little distressed the Conditional Use Permit process the Commission and Council approved isn't technically being "used" how it was intended. Staunton said he may be struggling with the setback of the terrace from Arrowhead; however, wants to be supportive of the Conditional Use Permit adding the design of the house is a great. Page 7 of 14 Commissioner Platteter stated he agrees the design of the house is very good but he continues to struggle with the setback from Arrowhead for both house and terrace. Platteter said he can't support the Conditional Use Permit because the setback to Arrowhead is one of the factors. Commissioner Scherer stated she lives in the neighborhood and likes the architect's adherence to the topography. Scherer noted the new house would be located at the exact setback from Arrowhead Lake as the previous house. A lengthy discussion ensued on the setback from Arrowhead Lake for the on -grade terrace and if the proposed terrace /deck would be made of permeable materials. Chair Staunton asked the applicant if they thought about locating the house closer to the street which would increase the setback from the lake. Mr. Liepke told the Commission much thought was given to the location of the house. He said the house is situated in a natural area. He pointed out if the house was moved farther forward the natural knoll would need to be removed which would require a lot of grading and more disturbance to the lot. Liepke also explained neighbors have expressed support for the house and its location. Mr. Dean stated they worked with the intent and the spirit of the Code. He pointed out there is a park like quality to this lot; partially due to the uniqueness of the adjacent vacant lot at 6608 Indian Hills Road. Dean stated the 6608 lot would never be developer per restrictive covenant. Continuing, Dean pointed out only the new proposed exterior terraces are located closer to the lake than the existing structure, adding those terraces are visually less impactful outdoor spaces than a raised deck. Dean stated the property owners will make every effort to provide permeable pavers for the terraces. Commissioner Carr asked if the terraces would be stone. Mr. Liepke responded he is not certain at this time; however his primary concern is the environment. He also informed the Commission the site would also be landscaped replacing the buckthorn which was found throughout the lot. Concluding, Liepke said he wants to be good stewards of this lot. Commissioner Forrest said to her it would be helpful if the Commission decides to approve this request that a condition for approval would be requiring a landscaping plan and the use of permeable terrace materials on the terraces. Commissioners Carr and Scherer agreed that conditions of approval should be added to a motion. Commissioner Potts stated he continues to struggle with the lake side, adding he feels the entire house should be moved closer to the street. Mr. Liepke reiterated the neighbors also support the layout of the house; especially the residents along the lake. Page 8 of 14 Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved Conditional Use Permit Approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Approval also requires the applicant to provide the City with a landscaping plan and to use permeable materials on the terrace(s). Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. A discussion ensued on the additional conditions with Commissioner indicating those conditions would remain. Chair Staunton called for the vote; Ayes; Scherer, Carr, Grabiel, Staunton. Nay; Potts, Platteter, Carpenter, Forrest. Motion failed 4-4 VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS' A. Sketch Plan Review — 6500 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Mount Properties has requested that the Commission consider a new sketch plan proposal to redevelop the property at 6500 France Avenue. Teague reminded the Commission Mount Properties previously received approval of a five - story, 62 -foot tall, and 102,478 square foot medical office /retail building with attached ramp. Teague explained the new sketch plan is a change in use to 109 units of senior assisted living; and 100 units of transitional and memory care. Teague stated to accommodate this request, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and an amendment to the PUD Zoning District is required. Appearing for the Applicant Stephen Michals, Mount Properties and Ed Farr, Edward Farr Architects Inc. Luigi Bernardi, Aurora Investments and Susan Farr, Ebenezer. Discussion Commissioner Kilberg noted that the plans depicted a skyway and asked Planner Teague if the skyway would require a variance. Teague responded that that was a good question, adding the skyway would require further review as part of the formal application process and at that time it would be ascertained if a variance was required. Page 9 of 14 Applicant Presentation Mr. Michals addressed the Commission and explained the change in use from a medical office /retail building to a senior assisted living facility is unique because of its proximity to Fairview Southdale Hospital and its use as a specialized senior care facility. Michals reported the new building would be operated by Ebenezer as a part of the Fairview Healthcare Systems. Continuing, Michals noted the recently constructed senior assisted living facility at 7500 York Avenue (York Gardens) is an award winning senior facility that is 100% leased and is also operated by Ebenezer. Michals said retail support services are also proposed for the "community" to include a pharmacy, Bistro, and a senior designed urgent care clinic. Michals introduced Susan Farr, of Ebenezer. Susan Farr explained Ebenezer believes the location of the proposed senior facility is excellent. It is proposed as a continuum of care from assisted to nursing home including short term stay options. Farr noted the proposed skyway would connect the medical uses provided by the hospital to the residents of the proposed building. Ed Farr delivered a power point presentation. Questions Commissioner Grabiel stated parking could be an issue for him. Planner Teague explained that the proposed use requires less parking than the previously approved medical office /retail use. Grabiel asked Teague for a breakdown of nursing/ apartment units in the proposed facility. Teague reported at this time the applicant is proposing a building with 109 senior assisted living units and 100 units which can be considered as nursing home type units. Teague said the applicant has indicated parking for the new use would be adequate. Commissioner Platteter said he agrees with Gabriel's concern over parking and questioned where visitors would park; and if visitors would be permitted to use the hospital ramp to park. Mr. Michals indicated the site provides 136 enclosed parking stalls and 8 surface parking stalls. He pointed out this is a senior building where parking demand is low, adding Ebenezer is very good with parking ratios and they have expressed the opinion that the proposed facility provides adequate parking. Use of the ramp would also be an option. Planner Teague commented that the City has also asked WSB to take a look at parking for the site and provide the City with a change in use traffic analysis. Commissioner Platteter noted that this proposal is a sharp increase in density and to the best of his knowledge it's also a density the City hasn't been asked to support. Platteter asked Planner Teague to look for density comparisons so when the applicant returns with a formal application the Commission can see what a building of this size and use "feels" like. Continuing, Platteter acknowledged this is a unique facility, adding it's not a "true" apartment building; it appears Page 10 of 14 part hospital. Platteter commented that the Commission has always been cautious with requests to amend the Comprehensive Plan. Reiterating density is an issue for him and an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan needs further thought. Chair Staunton commented that Ebenezer operates York Gardens and asked what the advantage is of this facility over York Gardens. Ms. Farr responded the difference is the location and the medical amenities provided by this location. Farr also noted this facility will also be a nursing home with extended stay suites and observation rooms. Residents of this facility will be able to "age in place" with all their needs met at this building. Technically residents of the building wouldn't need a car. Commissioner Forrest asked Ms. Farr if the facility has an age requirement. Farr responded in the affirmative. Forrest asked if the moratorium on nursing homes was lifted. Farr responded it hasn't been lifted yet. Forrest also commented on affordability and asked if there would be affordable units. Farr responded they are still working through the numbers; however, a percentage of the housing units would be affordable under the elderly waiver. Continuing, Forrest asked if this location could be considered isolating because of the busy street and the lack of day to day amenities in the immediate area. Ms. Farr responded this facility would provide a van to drive able bodied seniors to different locations and it would also be a full service building. Farr added that Ebenezer does a lot with " Lifelong Learning" such as music and art classes. They also offer a number of intergenerational activities. Farr reported that a couple of their facilities contain a day care center on site. Concluding, Farr said their goal is to enhance the life of seniors; it's not going to be a building where the residents feel "locked down ". Commissioner Car commented that she likes the design of the building. Carr said in her opinion this project is architecturally pleasing, it's not just flat building walls, concluding she especially likes the carved out terraces and court yards. Commissioner Potts noted the building now has more of a residential feel and asked how this building differs from the previous building with regard to structure. Mr. Farr responded that the previous building was a steel frame building with columns and beams with precast concrete floor systems. The new building is a cast in place post tension concrete design building which is top of the line and is also quieter than a steel cast building. Potts also asked if any thought was given to sustainability measures. Farr responded they aren't quite there yet. Commissioner Scherer stated she likes the idea of continuous care, adding the concept is great and the location of the new Twin City Orthopedics in relation to this building is also a plus. Commissioner Grabiel questioned if there could be a "fatigue factor" with senior housing. He pointed out the new facility at 7500 York and the Waters as examples of recent senior housing additions to Edina. Continuing, Grabiel also asked the applicant what's changed from then to Page 11 of 14 now, pointing out the Commission and Council went through almost a year of meetings to achieve the previously approved medical office /retail building. Mr. Farr responded with regard to senior housing Edina is an "old" zip code and the market analysis indicates Edina's residents would like to remain in their City as they age. Mr. Michals also added at the time of the original application the Fairview Health Systems wasn't involved and in January we were provided with new information and the partnership with Fairview Health Systems /Ebenezer and Aurora was formed. Continuing, Michals said Aurora Investments would own the building reiterating Ebenezer would operate the facility. Commissioner Kilberg informed the Commission he has worked with Ebenezer and has the utmost respect for their organization, adding he sees this redevelopment as a plus. Kilberg stated he likes the additional greenspace, concluding this is more appealing in his opinion. Commissioner Forrest said she believes maintaining a high quality of life for seniors along with continuous care is great; however, she stated the Commission worked hard on the previous project and project across the street. Forrest said she remembers during the discussions on the TCO building that the Commission expressed the desire for this area to become a medical campus and enhance the pedestrian experience while doing so. She pointed out this facility is now residential and the experience for the pedestrian would change. Concluding, Forrest stated in her opinion this request changes the vision for this area, adding she is concerned about that. Chair Staunton opened the meeting for public comment stressing that this is not a public hearing. Public Comment Susan Laiderman, 6566 France Avenue #402. John Windhort, 6566 France Avenue, #204 Mr. Laiderman 6566 France Avenue, #402 Marilyn Kemme, 6566 France Avenue, #1206 Discussion The discussion ensued with Commissioners expressing the opinion that the project is too dense. It was also noted that this project requires a change in use and the Commission and Council will have to revisit their previous vision for this area and decide if this proposal warrants a change in vision. Commissioners acknowledged they understood how the change in use occurred but the basic "use" of this corner must now be resolved by the question is the change in use right. Page 12 of 14 Commissioners also agreed that in many ways this building is a good transition. They indicated the height appears consistent and the skyway is an important amenity. Concluding, Commissioners reiterated the increase in density is of concern; however, it is mitigated by the decrease in traffic. Commissioners suggested to staff if this returns as a formal application that staff finds comparable buildings. Commissioners stated they want to know how a building with this density would look and interact. Chair Staunton thanked the applicants for their presentation. B. Zoning Ordinance Update — Residential Development Chair Staunton acknowledged the materials received from staff, adding at this time there would be no further discussion on the ordinance update; however, he suggested if Commissioners had any comments or additions to what staff provided to e-mail staff their suggestions, etc. Concluding, Staunton said the goal is to have the public hearing on the amendments to the ordinance sometime in June. C. Grandview District — Selection of two Planning Commissioners for a Community Advisory Team (CAT) Chair Staunton told the Commission that he; along with Commissioners Schroeder would be serving on the CAT. Commissioner Scherer moved to appoint Chair Staunton and Commissioner Schroeder as members of the Grandview Advisory Team. (CAT). Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Staunton also informed the Commission the Council may request that a small area plan be done on the Wooddale and Valley View Road neighborhood. He added when that "plan" receives the "go ahead" volunteers would be needed. Chair Staunton also aked the Commission to keep "in the back of their mind" that mid -term is coming up for review of the Comprehensive Plan. IX. STAFF COMMENTS None Page 13 of 14 X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Carr moved meeting adjournment at 11:20 PM. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chair Staunton thanked everyone for attending. (7w& Ilealtalke Respectfully submitted. Page 14 of 14 �l MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 25, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Braden, Franzen, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Sierks, and Whited. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE -CHAIR Director Houle called for nominations for chair. Member Janovy nominated chair Nelson and the nomination was seconded by member Bass. Chair Nelson accepted the nomination. There being no other nominations, the nomination was closed. All voted aye. Motion carried. Member LaForce nominated member Bass for the vice -chair and the nomination was seconded by member Franzen. Member Bass accepted the nomination. There being no other nomination, the nomination was closed. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Bass to approve the meeting agenda. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES . REGULAR MEETING OF MAR. 21, 2013 The following corrections were made: page 3, Safe Routes to School, '...it is completed but is concerned...;' page 3, Chair and Commission Member Comments, 'She said, according to what she's read,...;' ...aware of the administrative citation option;' page 4, 4th paragraph, '...she would be cautious of setting time limit...' Motion was made by member Braden and seconded by member Bass to approve the revised minutes of Mar. 21, 2013. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Active (Safe) Routes to School Presentation Ms. JoNette Kuhnau, associate with Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., presented an update on Active (Safe) Routes to School. Ms. Kuhnau said they have been working on this project for Bloomington Public Health since last year. She said Safe Routes or Active Routes to School encourages students to walk and bike, do it safer and to make it an active part of their lifestyle. She said in the 1960's over 50% of students walked or biked to school and now there are less than 15 %, even when they live less than one mile from school. She explained the benefits as improved health, students' behavior improved and so does their performance in the, classroom, and less congestion and pollution. This health initiative project is funded by the MN Department of Health and there are also federal funds available that are administered by MNDOT for planning purposes. The National Center for Safe Routes to School provides resources. Ms. Kuhnau said they are working in Edina and Richfield to develop a comprehensive plan to prioritize needs and create uniformity at all school sites and having a plan makes the school district and City eligible for funding and MNDOT needs to see a plan in place when funds are applied for. She said the plan addresses education also since infrastructure changes alone' is not enough to see changes in behaviors. To establish baseline conditions, she said they look at the number of students that currently bike or walk; lives within a half of mile to one mile of school to determine target audience; the entire infrastructure on school sites and routes; and district�policy for walking and biking to school. They also identify activities that are already happening around walking and biking, e.g. Edina has a walk to school day in the fall. Ms. Kuhnau said they will make short and long term recommendations around five categories: engineering (infrastructure - sidewalk, bike facilities, bike racks, etc .,), education and encouragement (parents /school support), enforcement (drivers' behavior), and evaluation (what's most effective). Data gathering in Edina includes a working group made up of Edina city and district staff, two members.of the ETC and Bloomington Public Health staff, and the group has had several meetings where they've discussed `data needs, challenges and overcoming them, etc. Ms.-Kuhnau said they've collected various maps from the City and the school district showing sidewalks, walking area, and has done site reviews for Creek Valley,_Cornelia, and Highlands Elementary Schools and the rest will be completed by May 2013. Additionally,.she said they've had meetings with all principals to learn about concerns at their specific site; conducted' student tally to see how students arrive at school (teacher tally during first hour). The next step said Ms. Kuhnau in.the data gathering process is a Parent Survey to determine attitude towards walking /biking and to identify obstacles that they will need to overcome to encourage walking /biking. The survey will be mailed to all families within the district and will also be available online. As they wrap up the data gathering process and work towards finalizing a draft plan, Ms. Kuhnau said some of the challenges and opportunities that they've seen in, Edina are schools already have active and engaged principals and parents (wellness initiatives and past participation in walk and bike events); over 150 students live in the walk zone; the City has.plans for additional sidewalks and bike facilities; students may live close to school but the direct route is long -- probably could get easements to shorten route, especially in areas where students are already cutting thru; physical education curriculum; schools' liability concerns (schools are not taking on increased liability because they are laying out a plan); bicycling on sidewalks is not allowed in some communities but they make exceptions, for example, children 10 years or younger can bike on sidewalks, and New York allows children 12 or younger or a 26" wheel diameter. Discussion • Why are there fewer walkers now? Because the number of vehicles per household has increased, number of parents working outside the home, new schools are built further out of city centers, and schools are on county highways. a Will the comprehensive plan need to be updated annually? No required updates at this time. • Will you be meeting with students to see why they do not walk /bike and how this could be improved? Member Sierks said she is on the Student Council and thinks this would be a good idea. No plans currently but this could be included. Member Bass agreed with member Sierks and also suggested meeting with the district's Wellness Committee. Lake Edina Pathway Proposal Director Houle said this was brought to the Park Board by the Park and Recreation Department and the Park Board voted it down. He said an ETC member. requested adding this to the ETC agenda. The path is from Parklawn Avenue to the cul -de -sac on Kellogg Avenue, on park land at Fred Richards Golf Course. He 2 said two reasons for denial are that they are planning a study to develop a master plan for the course and also planning to install a play structure at Lake Edina Park. City Council will be holding a public hearing on May 7. 1 Member Janovy said she asked to add this to the agenda. She said they discussed it at the BETF meeting with a Park Board member and it is in the Bike Plan as a primary route and in the CIP to be built in 2013. She said it is a transportation path and it would serve the purpose as discussed above by Ms. Kuhnau. She noted that there was a letter of support from a resident showing value to adults. Discussion ensued about the relationship ofthe Three Rivers Trail to the path and it was determined that the trail would not be impacted by the path. Member Bass clarified that the project (trail and play structure) was not introduced and hosted by do.Town, as stated in staffs memo. She said it was the Family Resource Center that hosted the event after residents expressed an interest and do.Town was in attendance to talk with residents. She agreed that there is a need for moving people and serving neighborhoods and the path was cited by neighbors as a transportation and recreational need. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce supporting the Lake Edina Park Path and to write an advisory communication to the City Council expressing support for the reasons stated tonight. All voted aye. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Committee Report of Apr. 3, 2013 No comment. Updates Student Members — None. Bike Edina Task Force Received minutes of Mar. 13, 2013. Member Janovy said there will be a Bike Rodeo at Cornelia Elementary School on April 27. Living Streets Working Group Chair Nelson said they are continuing to meet and their next meeting is scheduled for next Monday. Transportation Options Working Group Member Whited said she revised the advisory communication (Senior Transportation Option Study) and it was forwarded to Director Houle to be included on the City Council's May-7 agenda. Communications Committee — None. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues None. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member LaForce asked if the "Expect big delays" sign on France Avenue was related to the City's France Avenue Intersection Enhancement project. Director Houle said it is a County project that continued from last year. Member,LaForce asked how this project will impact the City's project. Director Houle said the City's'project will. not have nearly the amount of delay like "the County's project. Anticipated start date for the City's project is early July and the County'should be done with their' roject by this time. Member LaForce asked what communication has taken place regarding Wooddale Avenue since it has been approved for restriping. Director Houle said a letter was mailed to homeowners adjacent to Wooddale Avenue explaining the City Council's decision. Member LaForce said they should consider educating the public on how to drive on Wooddale with the new restriping. Member Janovy asked if staff received any feedback from residents on the letter that was sent out explaining the new restriping plan and director Houle said none have been received to date. Chair Nelson asked if director Houle was,aware of any other projects that the County or MNDOT is doing. Director. Houle said Minneapolis and the County are reconstructing Penn Avenue, north of the crosstown and in July /August, the bridge will be closed for redecking. Member Bass urged residents to complete the Parent Survey that was mentioned earlier. She asked Director Houle to see if the City's communication staff could help to promote the Parent Survey. Member Janovy asked for an update on Vernon Avenue. Director Houle said he is meeting with the County on Tuesday to talk about the bike plan as Vernon is scheduled for a mill and overlay in Sept /Oct. STAFF COMMENTS France Avenue Intersection Enhancement Update — staff met the March 31St deadline and all submittals, including easement acquisitions were approved by MnDOT. MnDOT is reviewing the final plans which could take about three weeks and then the project will be advertised for bids. The first Urban Design meeting for this project took place on April 22 and the plan is to schedule another meeting. Minutes from the first meeting will be distributed. Byerly's Redevelopment Update — City Council approved a feasibility study for a roundabout on Hazelton Road and staff is hoping to have a layout ready for the ETC's May 16 meeting and a public hearinglon June 4. A condition of the site approval is to have a right -in /right -out on France Avenue and staff is working with the County to make this happen. Pedestrian Plan Update —A transportation planner should be hired in about one month. Staff is beginning to review the Pedestrian Plan as they plan for 2014 projects and would like the ETC to help prioritize the order in which sidewalks should be built. Additionally, staff is recommending that at.least one sidewalk be built in 2013 from the six sidewalk feasibility studies that were approved by City Council but funding was not available. The approved locations are School Road, 42 6d Street, Interlachen Blvd, West Normandale Trail, Xerxes Avenue, and East Normandale. The Pedestrian Plan was not fully analyzed and Director Houle suggested that each ETC member look at their quadrant of the city and lay out where 'sidewalks should be, or clarify for him if the intention was to put sidewalks on every street or based on traffic counts. Member Janovy said the draft Living Streets Policy proposed principles and a priority system for sidewalks. In reference to the overall Pedestrian Plan, 4 A member Janovy suggested waiting until the Active Routes to School plan is complete, until they are further along with Living Streets and the transportation planner is hired, and regarding the sidewalks already approved, she suggested picking one or two to build. Director Houle noted that some Councilmembers have been inquiring about the Pedestrian Plan. Member Bass added that she appreciated acknowledgement of the delay but would prefer to wait and work with the transportation planner and to have an open and engaged public process. Xerxes Avenue Update — Residents' concern is that this is a two lane roadway that drivers drive as though it is three lanes (using the parking lane as a 3rd lane). Last fall, the County restriped it and the paint flaked off. Until they can repaint, they've placed barricades in the parking lanes and will be adding a variable message board telling drivers not to drive in the parking lane. The new layout will include bump outs at the intersections and traffic control delineators in the bump outs. Additionally, staff will be coordinating with the County and Minneapolis to do a traffic study from Heritage Drive to crosstown because as you might recall, both Penn and Xerxes Avenues bridge decks will be redone (pushing traffic into Edina) and it is good time to look at realigning the traffic lanes to make it safer. Member Janovy asked if they could also do video counts of pedestrians and bikes and Director Houle said yes. Member Whited asked which days counts would be done because traffic increases on the weekends and Director Houle said it would be done for a full two weeks. Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Update — Project start kick -off meetings are scheduled in the field with residents to meet the project inspector and contractor. The first one was last night but because of rain it was held at Public Works; feedback from residents was positive. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session # of Mtgs Attendance Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 4 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 3 75 % Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 3 75 % Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2016 1 1 1 3. 75 % I er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 3, 75% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 4 100 %, LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 4 100016 Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 100 % Schwei er, Steven student 1 1 2. 50% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 3 75 % S anhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 i 1 1 1 25 %, Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 100% 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION April 23, 2013 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bigbee called the meeting to order at 6:55 PM. II. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Cashmore; Davis, Kingston, Lagerstrom; Seidman, Stanton, Winnick, Chair Bigbee and Student Member Stang. Staff present: Lisa Schaefer, Staff Liaison and Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern. III. MEETING AGENDA APPR0VED' Motion was made by Commissioner Stanton to approve the meeting agenda of the April 23, 2013 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kingston. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Davis, Kingston, Lagerstrom, Seidman, Stanton and Winnick. Motion carried. IV. CONSENTAGENDA ADOPTED A. March 19, 2013 Minutes B. Community Outreach Work Group and Press Release. Motion was made by Commissioner Cashmore and seconded by Commissioner Seidman to approve the consent agenda. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Davis, Kingston, Lagerstrom; Seidman, Stanton and Winnick. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Lisa Finsness, addressed the Human Rights and Relations Commission regarding the removal of a Human Rights and Relations Commission Member. Finsness stated on February 5, 2013 a member was removed by the City Council, as a result of a complaint. She stated that the HRRC's role is to value human rights, which involves the right to participate in government and respect its community. • Concern was expressed about the removal by the Council allegedly without due process, due diligence or fact finding. Finsness was also concerned about the bylaws of the HRRC not honoring article 10 of the United Nations' International Declaration for Human Rights. • Finsness suggested correcting the wrong by having a conversation with the person affected by this complaint and amending the bylaws to require due process. Commissioner Kingston stated she did not feel that Finsness' statement was an accurate depiction of the situation, the actions of the City Council or the role of this Commission. Chair Bigbee reminded the Commission that although Commission Members may be asked to sit in interviews, the appointment or removal of individuals from the Commission is done by the City Council. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Plan a joint Work Session with Council Chair Bigbee reminded the Commission the joint work session will be held from 5:30 -7 pm on Tuesday May 7, 2013 Commissioner Kingston reminded the Commission the structure of past work, sessions. Last time, they highlighted the key accomplishments of the previous year and each group presented what they are working on. There is a specific item on the agenda related to the Domestic Partnership Ordinance that has been tabled to be-discussed at the work session with Council. Commissioner Stanton asked to discuss whether the Commission wants to bring forward the Domestic Partner Ordinance Revisions. He has two concerns, 1) next week the legislature'will . vote on legalizing same -sex marriage, which could render the ordinance redundant; 2) In July the Supreme Court will rule -on DOMA, which may have a lot of impacts related to benefits. Since it is in a state of flux and some of the ordinance itself is out of date, a lot has changed since 2010. Commissioner. Stanton made a motion to revisit in July, and ask the Council for their input on what is being suggested. There was not a second, motion failed. Commissioner Cashmore pointed out that DOMA will not affect businesses smaller than 50 employees, so it would not accomplish the goal of the revision. Commissioner Winnick explained even if marriage was legalized in Minnesota, the City does business with others outside the state. All this provision does is allow the City to give preference to a company that provides benefits for domestic partners. If this is the approach we take, the next level of discussion is whether or not it- should be exact or substantially similar. Commissioner Cashmore explained they put in exact because Council Member Brindle had concerns about justifying paying more because someone offers domestic partnerships. We wanted to give the City the out. The goal is for this to serve symbolically, as a gesture of support for companies who offer benefits to domestic partners. Chair Bigbee asked to put together a presentation which review of our previous years' experience and highlights the new ideas and initiatives the Commission has. The presentation will include: Anti - Bullying- Edina Reads, Tom Oye Award, adding Gender Expression to the City Ordinance, Opposition to the Marriage Amendment, Opposition to the Voter ID Amendment, Domestic Partner Registry, Conflict Free Materials, Days of Remembrance, Religious Observance Policy, Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals, Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan, Super PACs (even though it was tabled by Council). Commissioner Lagerstrom proposed an additional anti - bullying event for 2013 and provided information about what the Blake School is currently doing. Comm issioner,Seidman, stated we should bring to the Council that we will be working on another event for this year related to anti - bullying it will be a new event. Chair Bigbee asked if the Quasquicentennial is currently -on the work plan. City Manager Intern Klugman stated this event is not on the work plan approved by the Council, it will need to be presented to Council and get their approval. Chair Bigbee also stated we will review and update the Council on our current approved work plan items which include: Anti - Bullying- Edina Reads, Community Outreach related to Census Demographic Changes: The Community Outreach will have two initiatives to explain, the working group and the MN Advocates for Human Rights' community listening sessions training The City of Richfield has reached out to the Commission about training. Chair Bigbee stated the Commission will also present new ideas and initiatives to be discussed with council, an additional anti - bullying event, youth retreats and the Quasquicentennial event. B. Domestic Partner Legislation Review Commissioner Stanton gave an update on domestic partner legislation and stated there are three options right now that may get voted on in the next week or so. Those options include: the legalized marriage bill, a proposal for all new marriages to be civil unions for all couples regardless of sexual orientation and the bill the HRRC recommended to Council about local jurisdictions having the ability to define dependents for their own jurisdictions. C. Quasquicentennial City Manager Intern Klugman explained to the Commission die Quasquicentennial is not currently on the commission's work plan. Since the HRRC bylaws outline a press release is needed for the implementation of a new working group we need to get permission from the council to work on the project. Commissioner Lagerstrorn shared if they give permission we will be putting out a press release for the working group. Chair Bigbee shared that we have talked to a few people who signed up to be on the Human Rights and Relations Commission who were not selected to see if they have any interest in being on a working group. So far, four of them have expressed interest. Commissioner Winnick made a motion to approve the formation of the working group for the Quasquicentennial with the condition the Council gives permission at the joint work session and to give Leslie permission to work with staff to draft a press release for the working group. Commissioner Kingston seconded the motion. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Davis, Kingston, Lagerstrom, Seidman, Stanton and Winnick. Motion carried. D. General Work Plan updates i. Monitor Domestic Partner Legislation and the City Ordinance. 1 Commissioner Stanton shared the Council did amend the City Ordinance to include Gender Expression. Community Outreach Efforts- no updates. iii. Anti - bullying event and education- Edina Reads . City Manager Intern Klugman shared that the Communication and Technology services_ department is planning to finish up the video of the Edina Reads.event this Week. The video will play on channel 16 until May 26 on Tuesdays at 1 1 pm, Wednesdays 7 am and 3 pm.. Commissioner Davis asked if the video will be available on the website. Staff Liaison Schaefer responded that we will look into it. iv. Tom Oye Award Commissioner Winnick shared the Tom Oye Award presentation will be at 5 pin on April 30 at the volunteer recognition reception. Days of Remembrance Commissioner Seidman shared they are currently working with the JCRC to find a speaker for next year's Day of Remembrance. This year, the posters were put up in the lobby and the videos are playing on channel 16. Commissioner Seidman mentioned the_ Commission has only reused the information for the last two years and has not spent additional funds. Commissioner Kingston shared we still have the books, videos and handouts available from the last two years for future events. vi. Domestic Violence Commissioner Kingston shared when this was put on the work plan it was an idea from a commissioner and has not been started. She asked if this is an item the commission wants to continue to explore or if the commission wants to table the item and find out from the community what is actually needed. Since the work hasn't started. Commissioner Stanton shared through the human services task force, we are already currently funding this and we get a copy of their statistics. As a commission, he feels we need to be a little more focused and that others are better suited to work on this issue. Commissioner Davis stated her agreement with Commissions Stanton's comment. Commissioner Kingston asked about contacting the partners that the City is already funding to get an update. '1 Chair Bigbee asked if this is a priority or if the HRRC should remove it from the work plan. Commissioner Kingston made a motion to remove Domestic Violence from the 2013 work plan, Commissioner Winnick seconded the motion. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Davis, Kingston, Lagerstrom, Seidman, Stanton and Winnick. Motion carried. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS There was none. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS f Commissioner Winnick explained we have to appoint a member to serve on the Edina Community Council. Commissioner Winnick has served for the past two years, if anyone is interested in serving. Chair Bigbee asked if by June Commissioner could have their nominations selected. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Staff Liaison Schaefer reminded the Commission to register for the April 30 Volunteer Reception. City Manager Intern Klugman passed out an email from former Commissioner Meg Newell, saying goodbye and giving an update about the Charity Woods contact. 111 1-03101111 13 5 3 1:11,0111 There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Commissioner Davis moved and Commissioner Kingston seconded adjournment of the meeting. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Davis, Kingston, Lagerstrom, Seidman, Stanton and Winnick. Motion carried. Chair Bigbee declared the meeting adjourned at 9:07 PM Respectfully submitted, Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern Minutes approved by HRRC, May 28, 2013 Arnie Bigbee, HRRC Chair MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 21, 2013 10:51 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 10:51 P.M: ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were.Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Meeting Agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF May 7, 2013 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for May 7, 2013. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ENGINEERING SERVICES FRANCE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS - CONSTRUCTION PHASE Engineering Director Houle explained the WSB & Associates, Inc. proposal for the construction phase of the France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Improvement Project. The anticipated construction start date would be July 2013 with an estimated construction cost of $285,460. Mr. Houle explained the WSB proposal included a robust communication plan. During discussion it was noted that the communication plan would be. approximately ten percent of the total proposal. The items making up the WSB proposal were reviewed. Commissioner Swenson made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sprague to authorize the Executive Director to enter into an agreement with WSB & Associates for Construction Phase Engineering Services for France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Improvements. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -07 ADOPTED SETTING JULY 16, . 2013 AS THE HEARING .DATE ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GRANDVIEW 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, A. REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. Chair Hovland noted the proposed )Yesolution was required of the HRA to set a public hearing for July 16, 2013 to consider: modification to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and the proposed establishment of the Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District, a redevelopment district. He noted the same issue had just been acted on at the earlier May 21, 2013 City Council meeting. Motion of Commissioner Swenson seconded by Commissioner Bennett setting a public hearing for July 16, 2013 to consider modification of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment District, and the proposed establishment of the Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District, a redevelopment district. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item.#: HRA V. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion Date: June 4, 2013 Information Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -08, Authorizing the Acquisition of a Fee Simple Interest in Property Located at 3944 West 49-1/2 Street Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: After many years in business, the owners have retired and closed the Hooten Dry Cleaning business located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street. This site is located immediately adjacent to the North Parking Ramp that provides public parking for the employees and customers located at the 50th and France Business District. 1 City staff has been in contact with the property owners for several months as they contemplated closing the business. Efforts to acquire the property through a negotiated sale have not been successful. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) intends to use its condemnation authority to acquire the site while the building is-without active businesses. The acquisition will allow the City /HRA.to expand public parking options for the business district. The first floor of the expanded parking ramp may also include space for future municipal liquor operations. _ Attachments: Resolution No: 2013 -08 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 o- RESOLUTION NO.2013 -08 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3944 WEST 49 -1/2 STREET WHEREAS, the, Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "); owns and operates an off-street parking facility known as the North Parking Ramp at 3936 -3940 West 49 -1/2 Street ( "North Parking Ramp ") to provide public parking in the'50th and France business district; WHEREAS, the City of Edina ( "City") and the HRA have studied the parking availability for the 50th and France business district and have determined that additional public. parking is needed to support the continued success of this district; WHEREAS, the HRA has determined that expansion of the North Parking Ramp is necessary to provide additional public parking WHEREAS, the HRA has determined that acquisition of a fee simple interest in the single story building located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street, immediately west of the North Parking Ramp, is necessary to expand the North Parking Ramp to provide additional public parking; WHEREAS, the City owns and operates a municipal liquor store at 3943 West 50th Street and has further determined that it maybe necessary in the future to relocate said liquor store to a new location within the 501h and France business district; WHEREAS, a portion of the property at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street could be used to relocate the municipal liquor store currently located at 3943 West 50th Street, while still using the`remainder of the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street site for expansion of the North Parking Ramp; WHEREAS the business owners have closed the business located at the property; WHEREAS the City and HRA have been negotiating with the owners of 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property to acquire a fee simple interest in said property and to date have not entered into an agreement to acquire said property; WHEREAS, in order to construct the expansion of the North Parking Ramp and to have a site , available for the possible relocation of the Edina municipal liquor store currently.located at 3943 West 50th Street, it will be necessary to procure the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property through the right of eminent domain; and WHEREAS, the construction of the expansion of the North Parking Ramp makes it necessary for the City and HRA to acquire the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property as soon as possible, and no later than January 15, 2014,-and in order to construct such improvements on a timely basis it will be necessary to procure the required property interest through a "quick take" condemnation action, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042; 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF.THE HRA, that in order to expand the North Parking Ramp and obtain a site for the possible relocation of the municipal liquor store, the HRA proceed to acquire the required fee simple interest in the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street under its power of,eminent domain and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042, having first fulfilled the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.036 and all other necessary requirements for the exercise of eminent domain power; and that the attorneys for the HRA be instructed and directed to advise and assist the HRA with regard to fulfilling any necessary legal conditions for the initiation of an eminent domain action, and to file the necessary petition or petitions therefore and to prosecute such action or actions to a successful conclusion, or until it is abandoned, dismissed or terminated by the HRA or the Court; and that the attorneys for the HRA and the Commissioners, employees and agents of the HRA do all things necessary to be done in the commencement, prosecution and successful termination of such. eminent domain - proceedings; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it is hereby found and declared that the acquisition of a fee simple interest in the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street by the HRA under its power of eminent domain is necessary to expand the North Parking Ramp and to obtain_a site for possible relocation of the municipal liquor store. Dated: June 4, 2013. Attest: Ann.Swenson, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR James B. Hovland, Chair I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Special Meeting of June 4, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Special Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of I Executive Director C c i� eI��RPORA�F'9 1888 To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA VI From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 4, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Receive Feasibility Study and Consider Ordering Improvements, Hazelton Road Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -417, Resolution No. 2013 -9 Action Requested: If the HRA determines the project to be necessary, cost effective, and feasible, the HRA shall adopt attached Resolution No. 2013 -8 receiving the feasibility study, authorizing plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken for Hazelton Road Improvement No. BA -417. Information / Background: City staff initiated this project as part of the Byerly's Redevelopment Project. The Feasibility Study packaged with Item VI. C. of the June 4, 2013, City Council Agenda Packet. The overall project cost is estimated at $1,043,748. Funding for this project will be from the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing district. Please refer to the Feasibility Report for a breakdown of the costs. Right -of- way for the roundabout will also be required from four property owners. However, staff is anticipating that the right -of -way will be donated. Staff has had many internal discussions regarding the roundabout and has also shared the design with the Edina Transportation Commission and also has hosted an open house for the public. Staff does not have any issues with the roundabout and has not received any correspondence regarding this project. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -9 Feasibility Study — Hazelton Road Improvements, BA -417 (NOTE: See Item VI.C. for this attachment) GA PWICENTRA— I\ ENGDIV— I\ PROJECTSIIMPRNO- 11BA417H— ITRELIM- ITEASIB —I %PUBLIC —IXHRA Item A Receive Feasibility Study and Consider Ordering Improvements, Hazelton Road Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -417, Resolution No. 2013- 8.docx - City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -9 RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR HAZELTO" I'ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -417 WHEREAS, :at the request of the Edina City Engineer, a study have ,been prepared by staff and consultant with reference to the proposed Improvement No. BA -417, Hazelton Roadway Improvements; and WHEREAS, on the 16th day of April, 2013, the City Council fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA -417, the proposed improvement of Hazelton Roadway Improvements; and WHEREAS notices Were mailed and published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 4th day of June, 2013, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible. 2. Such improvement is hereby. ordered. ; 3. The city engineer is hereby,Oesignated as, the engineer for this improvement. The. engineer shall prepare plans aiid,specif,.icatiops for the making of such improvement. Dated: June 4, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Chairperson I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of June 4, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk GAPNACENTRAL SVCS\ENG DMPROJECTUMPR NOS1BA417 Hazelton Road Impr1PRELIM DESIGNTEASIBILIMPUBLIC HEARINGS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.goy - 952 - 826 -0371 - Fax 952 - 826 -0392 A newsletter for the City Council and employees of the City of Edina Bretson EQuips Himself for Relftement by Brady Skoglund, Communications Intern Greg Bretson knows Edina, and he should. He's spent nearly his whole life in the suburb - 34 of those years working for the City of Edina's Public Works Department. Bretson has decided to pass the baton at the end of May and begin a life of retirement. Bretson started in Edina as a technician for the Public Works Department on March 8, 1979. held this position for 17 years ire becoming the Equipment Operations Supervisor in 1996. The team includes Todd Halstead, Gunnar Kaasa, Jim Voelker, Jay Van Altvorst and Tony Leone. Over his 34 years, Bretson has seen a few changes, most notably the new facility. "What we had was such a far cry from what we have now," said Bretson, "it was like walking into the Dark Ages." The previous facility, located on Eden Avenue, was much smaller than the current building on Metro Boulevard and could not accommodate the 350 various vehicles the current facility holds. Bretson's time with Public Works is a career of which he's proud. Bretson said that being with Public Works has given him a �--. way of measuring accomplishment EDIINA because the work he has done is very tangible. tmpLoytt IDf NTIFfCATIOM WaGoltr W" _ wu it LIMA& "This team is the best I've ever worked with," said Bretson of his team of technicians. "We're like six brothers." Bretson's work with the Public Works Department has gained him a lot of fans, including Public Works Director Brian Olson. "Greg has been the biggest assistance that I've had transitioning into this role," said Olson. "He's been the most open, honest person." Gunnar Kaasa, who has been with the City for seven years as a echnician, has been preparing to move into Bretson's role and is thankful to have him as a mentor and friend. "Greg's been a great guy," said Kaasa, "he's been a very good tutor." With retirement comes a feeling of missing the work place, especially the people. Luckily, Bretson lives close to the Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility and is sure he'll see the guys often. "My right arm is going to get tired waving at the guys," said Bretson. Although Bretson is stepping away from the Public Works Department, he is not slowing down. He already has plans to head up to the 15 -acre family compound on Big Bass Lake this fall to remodel the cabin. Not, however, until after he and his wife, Karen, take a road trip to visit their son and daughter -in -law in Montana. Bretson has been a grouse hunter since he was 12 years old and is looking forward to being able to do that at the cabin with his new English Setter puppy, Stormy. Continued on Page 4 ... 511012013 THIS ISSUE 2 Around The Water Cooler 3 A Day In The Life ... 3 Caught In The Act 4 Staff Notes MILESTONES David Weierke, Public Works - Park Maintenance, 10 years. (May 5, 2003) Greg Bomsta, Fire - Building Inspections, 25 years. (May 16, 1988) Darrell Todd, Fire, 25 years. (May 9, 1988) May 10, Bob, Braemar Golf Course May 12, Tom, Police May 13, John, Public Works May 13, Kristin, Parks & Recreation May 15, Susie, Braemar Arena May 17, Brian, Police May 18, Aaron, Engineering May 18, Dave, Public Works �. i' pl J/ 1 1 i� Following is a summary of some of the projects of some departments, divisions and facilities. Other areas of the City will be featured in upcoming issues. Edina Art Center The selections for the 2013 -2014 outdoor sculpture exhibit have been selected and can be viewed on the Edina Promenade, 50th & France and Grandview Square beginning June 1. An opening reception for sculpture artists will be held June 12, at Pinstripes Bowling Bocce Bistro. Police Traffic Award WATERCongratulations to Edina Patrol Officer Nicole I Pesek, who received the "2012 Traffic Safety COOLER Recognition Award" award at an annual meeting of the Hennepin County Chiefs of Police Association on May 8. Sgt. Scott Kuyper, Officer Nicole Pesek, Sgt. Jeff Elasky and Deputy Chief Dave Nelson pose for a photo after Pesek accepts her award. p2 The award is given to those who show an outstanding effort in traffic code enforcement, innovate traffic safety programs, extraordinary success stories and overall dedication to traffic enforcement. In 2012, while working the night shift, Pesek made 32 DUI arrests and issued more than 877 traffic citations. In addition to showing a strong hand in traffic enforcement, Pesek takes part in the Edina Police Department's Teen Safe Driving Initiative. Kuyper said she's been instrumental in generating ideas to educate teen drivers on the various dangers of driving, included distracted driving. Explorers Congratulations to the Edina /Eden Prairie Law Enforcement Explorer Post 925, who placed in the 38th - annual Minnesota Law Enforcement Exploring Conference last month in Rochester, Minn. Post 925 placed second in "First Aid" and "Crime Prevention," fourth in "Use of Force" and "White Collar Crime" and fifth in "Slow Fire Pistol" competitions. More than 900 Explorers from Minnesota and surrounding sty' --; competed at the annual statewide conference working through scenarios that reflected real lice law enforcement situations. This was Officer Kenna Dick and Officer Brandon Kuske's last competition as Explorer advisors, as they will step down this year. We want to extend a huge thank you for their exemplary work and dedication to Post 925 for the last several years! May `Focus In' As a part of the 2013 "Focus In" campaign, Edina patrol officers will focus efforts on bike safety during the month of May Starting Over On May 1, Fox 9 aired a story about Detective Dave Carlson, who made a difference in a young woman's life after she was kidnapped and abused. It's a touching story that reminds us how important it is to show compassion and what a difference it can make. We encourage you to watch it at http: / /bit.ly /18ZbmG0. Fire Firefighter/ Paramedic Brandon Winkel spent the first weekend of May in Madison, Wis., for the 2013 Mad -City "Fire on Ice" Hockey Classic. Winkel participated on the Minneapolis Suburban team, and competed against teams from the Green Bay, Chicago, Madison, Milwaukee and Duluth Fire departments, among others. The Minneapolis Suburban team won the tournament, which benefits the Make -a -Wish Foundation. The Edina Fire Department's Fire Prevention Bureau is wrapping up fire safety talks, having done more than 15 visits in April. The Fire Department is gearing up for summer activities, including the Edina High School seniors' bonfire, spraying kids with fire hoses at parks, and neighborhood and block party visits. The Fire Department has begun the process to fill vacant Captain and Lieutenant roles. The positions should be filled sometime this summer. A DAY IN THE LIFE OF... BRAIMAR COIF COURSE FACIIITY COORDINATOR MA RY W 001 BRIDGE "I love lDIS by Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator When Mary Wooldridge started working at Braemar community. Golf Course at the age of 15, she never expected Wooldridge to make her career in golf, or even meet her future It's been fun husband at the City -owned facility to work for the City and I wouldn't "I started working at Braemar selling hot dogs and lemonade in 'the pit,"" Wooldridge said, describing the pit as a gazeb " U b t eween the nines" that sold snacks to golfers. "When I started, I never thought I'd be where 1 am today. I always thought I was going to work in an ad agency." When the pit closed, Wooldridge, an Edina native and current resident, change o worked in the clubhouse grill, which is where her romance started. thing." "I was in the grill, he was maintenance," she said. "His mom, who was also a former Park Board member, was my tennis coach and asked if I had ever met him. We were all good friends and would do stuff after work. leading to where she currently is today as Facility Coordinator. "I still do all of the buying and merchandising in the Pro Shop, but also wear many other hats," she said. "I coordinate the schedule of the course, including golf leagues, outside groups --a tournaments; run reports for the purse; do special orders and receive nvoices. It's a lot to do, but I love IN THE ACS -1 City Forester Tom Horwath, i'1-irk Maintenance Worker Mark Spain ind Public Works employee John Buckentine plant a tree in the snow at Garden Park May 3 to celebrate Arbor Day. The planting was originally scheduled for April 26, which was rescheduled because of snow the variety." Having worked for Braemar Golf Course for many years, Wooldridge has seen a lot of change. But one thing she said that has remained relatively consistent is the customers. "It's been fun to see the change, nd continually see the same people ne back to golf year after year," iid. But a long -time career can't go without a good story. We eventually got to know each other "[n 1987, we had a big sleepover in the clubhouse," and, well, here we she said. "There was a large group outing of 75 are." people, and a torrential downpour situated itself over the course. [Then - Manager john Vallerie] saw After the grill, the storm coming from the east and said `this Wooldridge doesn't look good' There was so much rain, no one started working could leave the parking lot. To make thing worse, in the Pro Shop in the power went out. So, we had Braemar staff and merchandising. She the big group of golfers stranded overnight. We temporarily left ended up firing up the outdoor grill and making Braemar when she burgers for everyone." got married and had her first son, but Even though she isn't writing copy for an ad came back to work agency, she is happy with how things have turned the Pro Shop as out. merchandiser and "I love this community. It's been fun to work for the buyer. City and I wouldn't change a thing." Since her return Wooldridge enjoys gardening, running with her 19 years ago, sister, going "up north" with family and golfing Wooldridge has at Braemar and other area courses. She also likes taken on more and spending time with her husband, Mark, and two more responsibility, boys, Tom and Matt. _, '�V� 1, ; p 3 NOTES Fire Captain Doug Bagley retired April 30, after 27 years with the Edina Fire Department. Bagley began work for the City of Edina in 1986 as a Paramedic and was later promoted to Captain in 1991. Prior to the City of Edina, Bagley held various emergency paramedic and reserve firefighter positions in St. Paul and Napa, Calif. City Manager Scott Neal was appointed as the Chair of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission. As Chair, Neal will oversee the operations and decisions regarding the public, education and government access channels for member cities, which is comprised of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Richfield and Minnetonka. Neal's appointment took effect April 24, and runs for one year. Wellness Commifiee Pick up your punch card at the next Wellness event! Collect 10 punches and receive a $15 gift card to one of these restaurants: • Q. Cumbers • Good Earth • People's Organic Cafe • Subway j V1 CaphAMfT1EE Accumulate a punch o °f every na you attend. collect P $15 gift card to a local restaurant! I Name 6 7 8 q 10 3 4 5 FIRST JOB -- patty McGrath What was your first job? I started as a weekend custodian and was then promoted to a bus girl, and then a pizza cook at the Italian Village Restaurant in Davenport, Iowa. Do you remember how much you were paid? I was paid $2.25 per hour and every now and then the waitresses would share their tips. If you could do it all over again, would you still take that job? Yes! It was not a glamorous job, but a terrific introduction to the working world and customer service. As an added bonus, you got a free meal at the end of your shift and all the soda you could drink. What did you learn on the job that you have carried with you into your career? The owner had very high standards and set clear expectations. Even though I was young, he instilled his philosophy of "if you are going to do a job, do it right!" and that has always stayed with me. Patty McGrath began work on March 18 as the General Manager for Edinborough Park and the Edina Aquatic Center. McGrath has a bachelor's degree in Recreation and Leisure Studies from Winona State University. She held various positions at the YMCA since 1991 and most recently was Executive Director of the Hudson and River Falls YMCA. • "My First job" is a feature of City Slick compiled by Lynette Biunno meant to give employees a glimpse of each other's professional beginnings. Greg Bretson Continued from Page 1 ... "I've got quite a few things on my bucket list," said Bretson, who is also a wood worker and plans on building a boat. Bretson has enjoyed working with Edina's Public Works Department because he sees it as being able to take care of the city where he grew up. "Everyone here in Public Works is like family," said Bretson, "the whole City is like family." There will be a retirement party for Bretson at 12:30 p.m. May 30 at the Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility. 3nop rot, arigiriol, one -of a kind garden inspireo items it STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of Governor Mark Dayton 130 State Capitol • 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard • Saint Paul, MN 55155 TO: LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WITHIN THE SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA FROM: OFFICE OF GOVERNOR MARK DAYTON DATE: FRIDAY, MAY 24, 2013 RE: - APPLICANTS FOR METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SEATS Governor Dayton is seeking applicants to serve on the Metropolitan Council (Council), and invites you to participate in the appointment process. Per state statute, the Minnesota Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, a redistricting bill modifying the Council's district boundaries. As a result, current Council members must re -apply to retain their seats, and applications for new members will be accepted as part of the open appointment process. Please provide any recommendations you may have, and encourage citizens who have an interest in the work of the Council to apply. State statute requires applicants to be knowledgeable about urban and metropolitan affairs, and to reside in the district for which they are seeking appointment. A map of the Council's districts can be found on line at: • hgp://www.gis.leg.mn/redist20 10/MetCouncil/mc2013 IA/openlayers/bidex.php?nai-ne=mc2Ol3-IA Metropolitan Council appointments are governed under the Minnesota Open Appointments process, which is administered by the Minnesota Secretary of State. Interested individuals should contact the Secretary of State's office for an application by calling 651 -556 -0643. Applications are also available on the Secretary of State's website at: • hiip:/ /www.sos,state.mn.us /index.aspx ?page =308 The Secretary of State published the notice of vacancies on Monday, May 20, 2013. Applications must be received by close of business on Monday, June 10, 2013, to be considered. Applications will be forwarded to the Governor's office and will be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council Nominating Committee. Qualified applicants will be invited to appear for an interview with the Committee at a public hearing in late June 2013. The Nominating Committee will make its recommendations to the Governor. Note: the Governor is not required to make appointments exclusively from the list of candidates recommended by the Nominating Committee. If you have questions about the appointment process, please contact Mr. Judd Schetnan, Government Affairs Director, Metropolitan Council, at 651- 602 -2242, or via email at Judd. schetnan(cDmetc. state. mn.us. Thank you for your contribution to this important process. Voice: (651) 201 -3400 or (800) 657 -3717 Fax: (651) 797 -1850 MN Relay (800) 627 -3529 Website: htW: / governor.state.mn.us An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on recycled paper containing 15 % post consumer material and state government printed