Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-08-20_COUNCIL MEETING>p AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2013 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of August 5, 2013, and Work Session of August 5, 2013 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 08/08/13, TOTAL $795,536.12 ; and Pre -List Dated, 08/15/2013, TOTAL $ 1,637,769.13 C. Request For Purchase — Rebranding/Design Services /Interior Signage And Displays For Edina Liquor Stores D. Request For Purchase — Contract No. ENG 13 -17NB — Vernon Avenue and Hansen Road Right Turn Lane E. Engineering Services — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Update F. Order Minor Plan Amendment To Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan G. Release Of Public Improvement And Special Assessment Agreement H. Approve Special Assessment Agreement I. Traffic Safety Report of July 3, 2013 J. Allocation of 2012 General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance K. Resolution No. 2013 -66 Amending Council Agenda L. 50th and France Parking Improvements — Design Services & Feasibility Study V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Emergency Preparedness Agenda/Edina City Council August 20, 2013 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff' members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Final Rezoning To PUD, Final Development Plan And Final Plat, Vernon Avenue Housing, 5109 -5125 West 49th Street, Resolution No. 2013 -64, Ordinance No. 2013- 8, (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary Plat Approval With Lot Width And Lot Area Variances, Rodney Helm On Behalf Of Tom And Gretchen Shanight, 5612 Tracy Avenue, Resolution No. 2013 -65 (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the some issue in the interest of time and topic Generally speaking items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Approve Living Streets Policy B. Sketch Plan — 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard C. Resolution No. 2013 -67 Accepting Various Donations IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes I. Arts & Culture Commission, June 29, 2013 2. Planning Commission, July 10 and 24, 2013 3. Heritage Preservation Board, July 9, 2013 Agenda/Edina City Council August 20, 2013 Page 3 4. Park Board, July 9, 2013 S. Transportation Commission, June 20, 2013 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Aug 20 Closed Session — Real Property Acquisition /Pending Litigation 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 20 Work Session — Sports Dome :6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Sep 2 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Sep 3 Work Session — Pentagon Park & Fairview Southdale Hospital ER 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sep 17 Work Session — Joint Meeting with HPB 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct I Work Session — Boards & Commissions 2014 Work Plan Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct I Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Oct 14 Work Session — Business Meeting/Utility Rate Study 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Oct 14 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov 4 Work Session — Human Services Task Force Study 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Nov 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov I I VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Nov 19 Work Session — Final Budget Review /Finalize 2014Work Plan 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Nov 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 28 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 29 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Dec 2 Work Session —joint Meeting With Edina Housing Foundation 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tue Dec 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 10 Special Meeting - Public Improvement Hearings 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tiles Dec 17 Work Session —TBD !s Dec 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS .es Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed at Noon Wed Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed at Noon Wed Jan 1 NEW YEAR'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 5 2013 5:40 P.M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hovland at 5:40 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Bennett, Brindle Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Wayne Houle, City Engineer; Annie Johnson, City Manager Intern; Ann Kattreh, Park & Recreation Director; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; and John Wallin, Finance Director Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to review the 2014 -15 Work Plan and 2014 -2015 Operating Budget 2014 -2015 WORK PLAN City Manager Neal reviewed the strategic priorities developed to date, noting a detailed description, key performance indicators and annual goals for: 1) Infrastructure, 2) Commercial and Mixed Use Redevelopment, 3) Workforce, 4) Communication and Engagement, 5) Community Vision, and 6) Aviation Noise. The Council and staff briefly discussed the six strategic priorities. Staff will develop a more formal 2014 -2015 Work Plan for the coming biennium. 2014 -2015 OPERATING BUDGET Manager Neal reviewed the process followed to date in developing the 2014 -15 Operating Budget. He noted that if all of 70 budget requests were implemented it would require approximately $1.4 M additional expenditures with about $700,000 new revenue opportunities and eight new full -time positions. There were also several adjustments to part time staffing and seveFal seven requests to cover additional health care costs that are expected as a result of PPACA. However, with the legislature's levy limits, Mr. Neal explained the 2014 budget could not increase beyond 3% of the tax capacity levies payable in 2014. He added that the partial municipal sale tax exemption, the delay of PPACA, the city's proposed health insurance increases, changes to the PERA Policy & Fire fund and the addition of new services since the 2012 -13 budget was developed, all present opportunities and challenges in development of the city's budget. Mr. Neal explained his recommendation would focus on three areas: workforce related costs, technology and capital. Some scenarios were reviewed and the Council discussed various aspects to be considered in the development of the 2014 -15 budget. The next step would be the development of the maximum possible levy that must be adopted in September, but which can be adjusted downward before the final levy is adopted in December. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 20, 2013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 5, 2013 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.A, Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of July 16, 2013, and Work Session of July 16, 2013, as follows: of july 16, 2013 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 18, 2013, and consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $163,183.78; Police Special Revenue $104.93; Working Capital Fund $333.02; Equipment Replacement Fund $1,788.73; Art Center Fund $4,340.33; Aquatic Center Fund $37.29; Golf Course Fund $ 56,595.47; Ice Arena Fund $26,513.20; Edinborough Park Fund $256.77; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $7,028.44; Liquor Fund $219,204.31; Utility Fund $39,242.69; Storm Sewer Fund $1,111.58; Recycling Fund $34,224.44; PSTF Agency Fund $897.03; Centennial TIF District $6,694.82; Grandview TIF District $4,724.57; Payroll Fund $2,310.24; TOTAL $568,591.64; and for receipt of payment of claims dated July 25, 2013, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $1,512,604.81; Police Special Revenue $92.03; Working Capital Fund $379,290.03; Equipment Replacement Fund $694.65; Art Center Fund $766.89; Golf Dome Fund $500.00; Aquatic Center Fund $29,886.05; Golf Course Fund $14,882.43; Ice Arena Fund $10,735.00; Edinborough Park Fund $6,263.81; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $7,912.77; Liquor Fund $124,073.23; Utility Fund $678,602.31; Storm Sewer Fund $477,898.24; PSTF Agency Fund $80.71; Grandview TIF District $18,211.76; Payroll Fund $7,527.03; TOTAL $3,270,021.75; and for receipt of payment of claims dated August 1, 2013, and consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $122,918.38; Police Special Revenue $3,154.00; Working Capital Fund $46,529.96; Equipment Replacement Fund $24,079.10; Art Center Fund $795.00; Aquatic Center Fund $12,527.97; Golf Course Fund $22,252.79; Ice Arena Fund $6,618.08; Edinborough Park Fund $22.229.83; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,317.05; Liquor Fund $241,391.03; Utility Fund $42.637.53; Storm Sewer Fund $77,569.93; PSTF Agency Fund $1,308.89; Centennial TIF District $7,375.82; Grandview TIF District $ 770.00; TOTAL $636.475.36; and, Credit Card Transactions dated May 26, 2013 — June 25, 2013; TOTAL $24,001.72. IV.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -60, authorizing Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement IV.D. Approve Election Equipment Agreement with Hennepin County IV.E. Approve Changes to Human Rights & Relations Commission Work Plan IV.F. Request For Purchase — Edinborough Park Pool Shell Re- surfacing, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Signature Aquatics at $55,841 Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 IV.G. Request For Purchase — HD Playback Equipment for Edina and Eden Prairie Government Access Channels, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Alpha Video and Comcast at $113,363 IV.H. Reject Bids — Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. III, ENG 13 -16 [V.I. Approve Change Order — Lake Edina Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction — Landscaping IV.J. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 6443 McCauley Terrace Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.A APPROVAL OF MINUTES — REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 16, 2013, APPROVED AS CORRECTED AND WORK SESSION OF JULY 16, 2013, APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Sprague requested the following correction to the Regular Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2013: Item VLA, page 4, bullet point six of the motion to state: "Front Facing Garage: eliminate ". Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the Regular Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2013 as amended above, and approving the Work Session Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2013 as presented. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY RESULTS PRESENTATION — DR. BILL MORRIS, DECISION RESOURCES — PRESENTED Dr. Bill Morris of Decision Resources Limited, provided a presentation and answered questions of the City Council on the major findings of the 2013 Quality of Life Survey. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, AMENDMENT TO PUD REZONING, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AURORA PROJECTS LLC, 6500 FRANCE AVENUE & 4005 65TH STREET WEST, RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -61 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -62 (COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT — AFFIRMATIVE ROLL CALL VOTE OF FOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PASS, REZONING AMENDMENT — FIRST READING REQUIRES OFFERING OF ORDINANCE ONLY. SECOND READING: FAVORABLE ROLLCALL VOTE OF THREE COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PASS. WAIVER OF SECOND READING: AFFIRMATIVE ROLLCALL VOTE OF FOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PASS) — ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the preliminary development plan of Aurora Projects LLC, 6500 France Avenue & 4005 65th Street West with the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and amendment to PUD rezoning. Mr. Teague explained that the City Council had been requested to consider a change to the proposal to redevelop the property at 6500 France Avenue. The previously approved plan for the site was a five -story, 62 -foot tall, 102,478 square foot medical office /retail building with an attached 4 -5 level parking ramp. Mount Development and Aurora Investments, LLC were requesting consideration of a change in use to 111 units of senior assisted and independent living; 66 units of ie transitional care /skilled nursing and memory care beds; and, 18 care suites. The "care" suites would include short term stays by patients #fat who have had surgery at Fairview Hospital or Twin City Orthopedic (TCO). The building would be similar in style to the previously approved building and still be five stories in height. A pedestrian skyway would connect the building to the hospital parking ramp to the north. The previously approved parking ramp would be removed and replaced with housing. The parking would be provided underground. There would be a 15,000 square -foot reduction in the structure footprint from the previous plan. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Mr. Teague explained to accommodate the request, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and an amendment to the PUD Zoning District would be required. The density of the development including all of the different types of units, at a total of 195, would be 83 units per acre, which would be a density higher than any development currently existing in Edina. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Regional Medical -RM." Senior Housing is not an allowed use within the RM designation. Therefore, the proposed use would require a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. The proponent had requested a Guide Plan amendment that would allow Senior Assisted Living Housing as a permitted use within the Regional Medical District. The transitional care units were already allowed in the RM District. Mr. Teague stated a Planning Commission motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Rezoning and Site Plan failed on a vote of 4 -5. The motion for approval included several conditions. Based on the comments and recommendations from the Planning Commission, the proponent had revised the proposed plans to address those concerns. Mr. Teague presented details of the revised plans presented by the proponent: • Chillers have been moved from the west side of the property near the loading area to the far northeast corner of the roof, and would be completely screened. • The upper floor balconies have been adjusted to conform to the originally stated setbacks. • Created a podium setback on the west side of the building and shifted the building six feet away from the west lot line. The third, fourth, and fifth floors would have a 58 -foot setback, and the first and second floors would have a 48 -foot setback. The previous plan had a 42 -foot setback for all floors. • Attempted to create a more pedestrian friendly environment on France Avenue by relocating a coffee shop /bistro and moving the public art to the corner. • Added twelve large coniferous trees on the Cornelia Apartment site for additional landscaping. • Moved the resident garage access to the north wing on the west side (was previously on the south wing). • Created a dock high access door and extended the memory garden slab over the truck dock. This would provide screening of the trucks during unloading. • Agreed to limit the hours of major deliveries to 9 a.m. through 4 p.m. • Created several service vehicle short -term parking spaces on 65th Street West at the front door for smaller truck deliveries. This would reduce the number of deliveries on the west side of the building. • Added a third lane to the proposed west entrance on 65th Street West. • Agreed to quantifiable benchmarks for sustainability. A pledge to attempt to achieve an 18% savings over baseline systems (In comparison, Byerly's pledged to achieve a 10% savings.). • Reduced the number of units from 197 to 195. • IRGFease the Increased affordable housing from four units to 10% of the assisted and independent units (11 units). Mr. Teague reviewed suburban examples of high density regulation and development in the cities of St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, and Bloomington. He presented suggested Comprehensive Plan Amendment language as recommended by staff, and advised that staff was further suggesting flexibility in regard to density for senior housing in the HDR District, as well as the RM District. Mr. Teague stated using the recommended amended text as a basis for review of the subject project, a case could be made to support the proposed high density through the PUD Zoning process. The proposed project would be connected to Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway so residents would not have to go outside to go to appointments at the hospital. Based on the traffic study by WSB, the use would generate less traffic than would a 102,000 square -foot medical office building with retail uses on the first level. There would be adequate sewer capacity to serve the project, and water would be available to the site. Convenient transit service was available for workers and residents as the MTC #6 bus was available at the building. Additional routes in the Southdale area were the 515, 538, 539, 578, 579, and 684. The Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 building would include sustainable design principles, public art, and affordable housing with primary parking below grade. Mr. Teague reported on staff's recommendation that the City Council approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow senior housing in the RMS District; to potentially allow greater density for senior housing development under certain circumstances on a case -by -case basis; that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District; and, approve the Preliminary Development Plan subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. Mr. Teague answered questions of the City Council relating to senior housing building density examples o.,,, -- the Gi ; public access to retail amenities; affordable housing calculation; the proposed green roof parking structure and terrace area; and, sustainability. Mr. Teague stated he would be involved with the sustainability element of the development. He answered additinn;d relocation questions of the City Council relating to the addition of the chiller; parking requirements; definition of senior housing to include transitional care /skilled nursing; trash pickup; and, density level / FAA floor area ratio in relation to the previously approved plan and the plan as currently proposed. Proponent Presentation Members of the Development Team, Luigi Bernardi of Aurora Development, LLC, Stephen Michals of Mount Development, Susan Farr of per Ebenezer, and Edward Farr of Edward Farr Architects, provided information on the Preliminary Development Plan for 6500 France Avenue and 4005 65th Street West, including modifications made to the proposed plan following the July 10, 2013, Planning Commission meeting. The Development Team answered questions of the City Council relating to the skyway, public access to retail amenities, parking, and setbacks. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing. Public Testimony Maria Field, Chief OpeFat°^^ 0 Executive of Heritage of Edina, 3420 Heritage Drive, addressed the Council. Kate Hamilton- Sones, Director of Nursing at Heritage of Edina, 3420 Heritage Drive, addressed the Council. Ron Q4 Kalick, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 901, addressed the Council. Marilyn Kemme, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 1206, addressed the Council. Mark Waterston, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 1203, addressed the Council. sa#Iia Dalia Katz, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 503, addressed the Council. Ralph Laiderman, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 402, addressed the Council. Craig Alshouse, Developer, Co- Owner, and Manager of Cornelia Place, 4025 West 65th Street, addressed the Council. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Maria Ga4+g Kalick, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 901, addressed the Council. Susan Laiderman, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 402, addressed the Council. Tanya Belanger, 6326 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. City Attorney Mattick addressed issues raised during public testimony, indicating that action on the proposed Guide Plan Amendment would not set a precedent for other developments in relation to density. Chuck Rickart, WSB, addressed issues raised during public testimony, providing information on the traffic study associated with the proposed development. Mr. Farr and Mr. Michals addressed issues raised during public testimony, providing information on trees included in the landscaping plan, distance between buildings, proximity of the building to the sidewalk, trash pickup, and density. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to staff's recommendation for approval with the proposed density. He stated the traffic study showed that the revised plan would generate less traffic than the original proposal, adequate parking would be provided, there would be the connection to the hospital, the skyway, public access to the retail amenities, an affordable housing component, sustainability, the building would not be taller than the originally proposed building with the cubic footage actually reduced, and the parking would not be a surface parking lot. He stated the proposed development had reached a level that would be a benefit to the City. There was discussion on density, the affordable housing component, and regulation of trash pickup hours and /or coordination of trash pickup with the neighboring development. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -61, Approving a Guide Plan Amendment to Allow Senior Housing in the RMS District and Determine Maximum Densities for Senior Housing on a case -by -case basis, based on the following findings: 1. Senior Housing is a compatible use with the Regional Medical District. It would provide seniors a benefit of having medical facilities within close proximity. 2. Densities for Senior Housing within the RMO & HDR Districts would be determined on a case by case basis, allowing the City some discretion as to when high density for senior housing may be appropriate. Densities for senior housing would be based on proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. 3. In general, senior housing generates less traffic than all -age housing or medical office facilities. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Roll call vote Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -62, Approving Preliminary Rezoning to Amend the PUD, Planned Unit Development – 3 Zoning District and Preliminary Development Plan for Aurora Investments at 6500 France and 4005 West 65"' Street, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, ass — " ;e 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street, provides underground parking, and provides an indoor pedestrian connection to the hospital. 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, architectural precast concrete, and glass, and is compatible with previously approved medical building. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. S. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. Traffic generated by the proposed project would be less than the approved medical building for the site. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of linear buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 7. Higher densities are justified for the following reasons: The project would be connected to the Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway, tying the project to the Hospital; Senior Housing would generate less traffic than the approved medical building with retail on the site; existing roadways would support the project; adequate utilities are available to the site; convenient transit service is available for workers and residents; the building would include sustainable design principles; public art is proposed; affordable housing is offered; and primary parking would be below grade. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated July 26, 2013; including construction of the skyway connection to the Fairview Hospital parking ramp. 2. A noise study must be done to demonstrate that the proposed mechanical equipment meets all noise regulations. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 3. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's revised narrative. 4. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. S. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated July 2, 2013. 6. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 7. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. S. Affordable housing units shall be 10% of all units with the exception of the transitional care units. 9. Deliveries on the west side of the building shall be limited to 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. Member Sprague seconded the motion. A friendly amendment was offered by Member Bennett, accepted by Member Swenson and Member Sprague, to amend Condition No. 9 as follows: Deliveries on the west side of the building shall be limited to 9:00 am to 4:00 pm., as shall trash pick -up unless otherwise coordinated with neighboring buildings. lit was neted that PAF. Teague w9uld bee invelved 40.41; the sustaiRability element ef the develepment. 'Developer agreed to list Cary Teague as Design Team Member for purposes of the Xcel EDA program, and that Mr. Teague would be copied on all communications with Xcel concerning_ sustainability measures related to the EDA program. Roll call vote: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. CONSIDER ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS & MODIFICATIONS OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOLUTION NO. 2013-63 — ADOPTED City Manager Presentation Manager Neal presented information on the City's issuance of Build America Bonds in 2009 to help finance construction of the new Public Works building. The agreement stated that if the federal government were to short the City on its planned subsidy of those bonds, it would give the City the ability to refinance -those bonds. The City had not received the August 1, 2013 scheduled subsidy payment on the bonds from the federal government. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute, the City might issue bonds to finance capital expenditures under its Capital Improvement Plan without election provided that, among other things, prior to issuing the bonds the City adopted the Plan after a public hearing thereon and published a notice of its intention to issue the bonds and the date and time of a hearing to obtain public comment on the matter. It was anticipated that the City would save approximately $200,000 over the life of the bonds. The public hearing scheduled tonight was to receive public testimony on the proposed refinance of the Build America Bonds. Finance Director Wallin informed the Council that Resolution No. 2013 -63 would adopt a modification to the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and approve the issuance of the General Obligation Bonds for the refinancing. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -63, adopting a modification to the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and approving the issuance of General Obligation Bonds. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. PRIORITY USE POLICY BRAEMER ARENA Parks and Recreation Director Presentation Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh presented background discussions on a priority use policy for Braemar Arena due to the demand for prime season ice at the Arena. While Braemar Arena was currently able to meet nearly 100% of ice needs for Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club (BCLFSC), it was only able to meet less than 500 of the ice needs for the Edina Hockey Association (EHA). Ms. Kattreh stated staff had hosted three meetings, each with three representatives from the EHA and the BCLFSC, to work towards a solution for the priority access agreement and ice allocation at the Arena. At the end of the third meeting, they were unable to reach an agreement that was acceptable to both the EHA and BCLFSC. Consistent with the message.to the EHA and BCLSFSC at the start of the process, if the group could not reach consensus on a draft priority use policy for the arena, staff would draft one unilaterally and submit it to the City Council at the August 5 2013, meeting for consideration and possible adoption. Because the two groups could not reach a consensus on a priority use agreement, the proposed priority use policy did not have the support of either the EHA or the BCLFSC. Ms. Kattreh presented staffs proposed priority use policy for Braemar Arena, noting that in addition to establishing priority categories, the proposal also describes the transition for implementing the policy in the East Arena. She explained that as staff and representatives from the respective organizations discussed the terms of the possible priority use policy, they discussed several alternatives for distributing the Prime Season -Prime Time Hours. Staff's current recommendation is as follows: Current: EHA: 2000 BCLFSC:700 Year 1: EHA: 2118 BCLFSC: 582 Year 2: EHA: 2250 BCLFSC: 450 Year 3: EHA: 2250 BCLFSC: 450 Year 4: EHA: 2458 BCLFSC: 241 Ms. Kattreh noted the following options for consideration by the Council: 1. Do Nothing —The Council could decide to do nothing. There was no legal requirement to have a priority use agreement for City facilities. This option preserved the status quo for both the EHA and the BCLFSC in the East Arena. 2. Postpone the Decision. — the Ga -un� °1 cauld decide that ° PFi9Fity use agFeemeRt was but ReW war-, nn-t t-hp- time to ad9pt ene, and cauld table this dee;,-;qR-.R until .;; fi-A-We t-APARP-d- Ar "RdPfiRPd dat 3. Adopt the Staff Recommendation. if +h e C-49-- ,r;1 . e +„ decide that a pFieFity use eliey was 4. Adopt an Alternative Policy. —The G^„^e;I epuld ae,.,ae that a .,.,,,..+„ USe pel*Gy 4A Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Ms. Kattreh stated staff would recommend Option 3. Ms. Kattreh and Braemar Arena General Manager Miller answered questions relating to the tetal numbeF^F� s-c;uFFen tly used by oE6PSG, WS figure beck °e^ t *Fn the definition of prime season, the total number of hours rented by BCLFSC in the prime and non -prime seasons, U.S. Figure Skating's requirement that a figure skating club conduct the majority of its skating activities in its home arena, "envelope criteria" for the synchronized skating Team Braemar limiting its ability to change its training facility, and ice arenas where BCLFSC potentially can rent ice time. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the staff recommended allocation of ice hours for Braemar Arena, with the following amendment: Year 1: EHA: 2118 BCLFSC: 582 Year 2: EHA: 2250 BCLFSC: 450 Year 3: EHA: 2250 BCLFSC: 450 Year 4: EHA: 2-4582349 BCLFSC: 244 350 And that a study be completed after the second year of how BCLFSC was functioning in relation to ice time and as a club. There was discussion on the $20 /skater fee paid by BCLFSC, the Decision Resources Quality of Life Survey results in relation to recreational facilities in the community, US Figure Skating Association requirements in relation to home arenas, priority ice time hours and usage, potential alternative arenas for BCLFSC to book ice time, 2012 net operating deficit of Braemar Arena, supply and demand for sheets of ice in the City, and a potential task force to study the effects of the change in ice hours. Member Swenson and Member Sprague withdrew the motion on the floor. Motion by Member Sprague, seconded by Member Swenson, appFGViRg +"^ staff rec- a-mm° ^a °a approving the following allocation of ice hours for Braemar Arena, with the following amendment: Year 1: EHA: 2118 BCLFSC: 582 Year 2 and going forward: EHA: 2250 BCLFSC: 450 Year 3; ELI ;- 2,250;B F6G* 45 Year 4- EWA; - 2459; 11CV6Q � And that a study is to be completed after the second year of how BCLFSC is functioning in relation to ice time and as a club, and that $20 user fee conventional agreements be drafted for the EHA and BCLFSC and presented to the Council for ratification. There was discussion on determining the appropriate balancing point for rental of ice time. Manager Neal suggested that Council make a decision on the volume of ice time with staff preparing a process for the proposed evaluation of the effects on the change in ice time. Motion by Member Swenson, seconded by Member Sprague to call the question. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion on the floor: Ayes: Sprague, Swenson Nays: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Motion failed. Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /Aukrust 5, 2013 Motion by Mayor Hovland, seconded by Member Bennett, to reduce the BCLFSC ice hours and pass them to the EHA as follows: 159 hour reduction in 2013/2014 during prime season (September 16`h to March 15th); 159 hour reduction in 2014/2015 during prime season (September 16`h to March 15`h), with staff directed to determine a process to evaluate future allocation of ice time to be recommended by the Park Board and adopted by the City Council, to be completed by the second City Council meeting in May of 2015. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hovland Nays: Sprague, Swenson Motion carried. There was discussion on whether and how to proceed with ratification of $20 user fee / conventional agreements with the EHA and BCLFSC. Motion by Member Sprague, seconded by Member Brindle, to direct staff to negotiate the final terms of the $20 per participant fees and other conditions and to present the conventional agreements with the EHA and BCLFFC to the Council for ratification. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried VIII.B. SECOND READING — ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING THE R -1 & R -2 ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING COVERAGE, SETBACK, HEIGHT AND GENERAL REGULATIONS, ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -7 (SECOND READING: FAVORABLE ROLLCALL VOTE OF THREE COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PASS) —ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague informed the Council that based on the direction of the City Council at first reading, staff drafted Ordinance No. 2013 -7(a) for consideration. Staff also drafted Ordinance No. 2013 -7(b) that included the recommendation from the Planning Commission in regard to side yard setbacks. If the Council were to be in agreement with the Planning Commission version of the Ordinance, Council was asked to choose between the alternative language presented in the staff report. Staff agreed with the Planning Commission in that the alternative side yard setback requirement of 25% of the lot width would bring greater simplicity and clarity than the sliding scale. Mr. Teague noted there were two different effective dates for certain provisions within the Ordinance. Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the Ordinance would take effect immediately. It would put in place the regulations regarding site issues, including maintenance access, grading, drainage, and retaining walls. It would also relocate the building coverage requirements into one location in the Code and eliminate the accessory buildings used for dwelling purpose language. Sections 5, 6, and 7, relating to building structure requirements would take effect January 1, 2014. By delaying to the first of the year, it would allow those that were in the process of designing homes time to finish their designs, and still begin construction this year. It would also allow time for builders and architects building in Edina, to inform their clients of the new regulations and effective date. New building in 2014 would all be required to meet the new Ordinance. Planning Commission Members Potts and Forrest answered questions of the City Council on the proposed ordinance amendment. There was discussion on Section 6, Side Yard Setback Requirements, and allowing the option of (a) Planning Commission proposed interior side yard setbacks of adding 2 feet to the current setbacks or (b) second floor setback. Staff was directed to modify Section 6 to allow the options and to present this section for Council consideration (Sections 5 -7 to be presented at a future City Council meeting). There was discussion on Section 2, Drainage, Retaining Walls, and Site Access, and on Section 5, Egress Windows Wells Encroachment. Member Swenson made a motion to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2013 -7, Zoning Ordinance Amendment Regarding The R -1 & R -2 Zoning District Requirements For Building Coverage, Setback, Height and General Regulations, Sections 1-4. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Page 10 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. C. LB 71 FRANCE ADDITION (BYERLY'S) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT —APPROVED Economic Development Manager Presentation Economic Development Manager Neuendorf stated on June 4, 2013, the City Council approved the redevelopment plans for the Byerly's site at 7171 France Avenue to allow for a new grocery store and three housing /retail buildings. As a follow up to that approval, City staff and City Attorney Knutson have prepared a Development Contract. This contract identifies the specific roles and responsibilities of the developer and City, sets conditions for the subdivision of land and establishes engineering and site development safeguards to ensure public safety and well -being during and after construction. This contract also specified that an outlot parcel be transferred to the City to construct new storm water detention facilities and water feature per the July 2007 Promenade Plan. Mr. Neuendorf explained that the private redevelopment would occur concurrently with three major public works projects: improvements to France Avenue, Hazelton Road, and the Promenade. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague Brindle, approving the LB 71 France Addition ( Byerly's) Development Contract and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the documents. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-58, ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS -ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member a Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -58 accepting various donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. "�A. VIII.E. APPOINTMENT TO EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, appointing Emily Boettge to the Edina Transportation Commission for a term expiring February 1, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. 1X.8. MINUTES: 1. HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION, JUNE 25, 2013 Informational; no action required. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received There was discussion on adding an Aviation /Air Noise Update to the end of the Reports /Recommendations portion of the agenda. Clerk Mangen explained that the addition of items to the regular City Council agendas would require a resolution to be adopted by the City Council. Staff was directed to prepare a resolution for Council consideration at the next City Council meeting. Page 11 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 There was discussion on the current Planning Commission vacancy, noting that Michael Fischer would be willing to fill the remainder of the term. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the appointment of Michael Fischer to the Planning Commission for the remainder of the term of Jeffrey Carpenter. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 20, 2013. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the August 5, 2013, meeting available. Page 12 CITY OF EDINA 817/2013 9:21:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 8/8/2013 — 8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 373916 8/812013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 14.00 321075 1706735 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 113.20 321303 1706740 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 75.60 321304 1707474 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 93.20 321305 1706734 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 296.00 373917 8/8/2013 129458 ACME TOOLS 894.54 DRILL DRIVERS 00005469 320764 2061020 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 894.54 373918 81812013 114322 ADVANTAGE COATING INC. 17,544.72 RANGE FLOOR REFINISHING 321181 4617 7412.6103 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE 17,544.72 373919 81812013 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 248.00 CARBON DIOXIDE 320699 31084435 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 128.15 CARBON DIOXIDE 320700 31086833 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 376.15 373920 818/2013 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 1,083.71 VALVES, TUBING 00001503 321182 13351 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 1,083.71 373921 818/2013 132478 ANDERSON,ALICIA 54.00 PARK & REC PROGRAM REFUND 320701 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 54.00 373922 8/8/2013 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 462.81 CONCESSION PRODUCT 320702 1964601 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 462.81 373923 8/812013 118491 APPLE INC. 119.00 WARRANTY FOR CTS IMAC 00004344 320593 4246237673 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,702.87 IMAC FOR CTS 00004344 320594 4246636429 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,821.87 373924 81812013 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 694.19 STENNER PUMP 320703 41016 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 694.19 373925 81812013 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY R55CKREG LOG20000 8/8/2013 CITY OF EDINA 817/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register ART WORK SOLD Page - 2 071013 5101.4413 8/812013 -8/8/2013 23.40 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,030.00 320822 24717 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 513.00 PLANT 321045 24994 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,364.00 16.16 321076 24910 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,907.00 81812013 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 373926 8/8/2013 120995 AVR INC. 122.35 BATTERIES 00003002 320704 1,529.38 READY -MIX 00005112 321247 8085B 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,812.60 READY -MIX 00005100 321248 81000 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 2,322.39 READY -MIX 00001245 321249 81627 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 2,265.75 READY -MIX 00001245 321250 81717 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 849.66 102.55 321251 82234 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 821.33 8/8/2013 321252 82132 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 5.664.38 321253 81930 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 373927 8/8/2013 112862 AXELSON, MARY 23.40 ART WORK SOLD 320796 071013 5101.4413 23.40 373928 81812013 100638 BACHMAN'S 16.16 PLANT 320595 10450174 5422.6275 16.16 373929 81812013 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 122.35 BATTERIES 00003002 320704 018 - 310273 1400.6406 122.35 373930 8/812013 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG 102.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321254 080513 5510.6107 102.55 373931 8/8/2013 102608 BAVARIAN MUSIKMEISTERS, THE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/14/13 320705 072513 5760.6136 150.00 373932 8/812013 127908 BAZZILLIONS, THE 25.00 BAL DUE ON 6/11/13 PERFORMANCE 320706 072513 5760.6136 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/15/13 320706 072513 5760.6136 225.00 373933 818/2013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 935.50 320823 79202600 5842.5512 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 817/2013 9:21:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 8/8/2013 -818/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 42.55 321077 79295700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 663.30 321078 79295500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,239.85 321079 79295200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 418.60 321080 79295400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 80.87 321081 88829500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 36.55 321082 79295300 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6.78 321083 88829400 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 208.98 321306 88829700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 93.04 321307 88829300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 434.25 321308 6344600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 75.00- 321309 88728800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,105.47 373934 8/812013 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 95.55 ARTWORK SOLD 320797 071013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 95.55 373935 81812013 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 164.90 JULY 4TH FLOAT MAKING SUPPLIES 321255 072613 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 164.90 373936 8/8/2013 125139 BERNICK'S 453.60 321046 74826 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 619.15 321047 74829 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,072.75 373937 81812013 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 150.95 COFFEE 321183 1108879 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 150.95 373938 81812013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 282.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 320596 WO- 868583 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 21.29 PENS 320597 WO- 868768 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 127.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003201 320598 WO- 867688 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003202 320599 WO- 867756 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 17.79 TAPE DISPENSERS 320707 WO- 868500 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 57.77 CHAIR MAT 320708 OE- 325772 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 170.36 OFFICE-SUPPLIES 320709 OE- 325697 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 43.17 STAPLER, PITCHERS 320765 OE- 325901 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 48.44 DISINFECTING WIPES 320766 WO- 869544 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 113.97 LABELS, PENS 00009273 321184 OE- 325044 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 941.22 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 617/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 4 8/8/2013 -8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 373939 8/8/2013 101376 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 102.60 DOGGING KEYS 00002001 321185 S83086 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 102.60 373940 818/2013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 62.76 WHITE BOARD, BOOKENDS 00001457 320768 88808 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 62.76 373941 818/2013 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 150.72 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003642 321055 81141543 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 573.78 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 321056 81149675 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 724.50 373942 8/8/2013 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 752.00 321084 114779 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 752.00 373943 81812013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 35.90 BATTERY CABLE 00005372 320767 763893 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 364.43 GLASS 00005178 321256 756314 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 400.33 373944 81812013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 3,427.00 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS/TESTING 320648 371449 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 2;200.00 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY -BUS GARAGE 321257 372319 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 5,627.00 373945 81812013 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 426.00 CANDY 320710 2340:034551 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 426.00 373946 81812013 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 807.98 AUG 2013 NEWSLETTER 00008286 320600 31824 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 807.98 373947 8/812013 120541 CANNON RIVER WINERY 234.00 320825 5528 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 234.00 373948 81812013 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 120.00 OCE MAINTENANCE 321057 988008091 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 817/2013 9:21:56 Page- 5 Business Unit INSPECTIONS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 802.75 CITY OF EDINA 330815 R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 320.00 321085 332647 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,683.65 8/8/2013 -8/8/2013 321086 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,852.60 60.68 OCE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 321058 988016253 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 180.68 5,659.00 373949 81812013 122888 CAP AMERICA INC. 373951 81812013 286.73 HATS FOR DOME GROUNDBREAKING 320711 698930 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 286.73 108.00 373950 818/2013 321258 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS 817/2013 9:21:56 Page- 5 Business Unit INSPECTIONS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 802.75 320826 330815 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 320.00 321085 332647 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,683.65 321086 330816 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,852.60 321087 330817 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,659.00 373951 81812013 132520 CARPENTER, JENNIE 108.00 PARK & REC PROGRAM REFUND 321258 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 108.00 373952 81812013 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 287.50 320827 96352 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 326.00 320828 96373 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 613.50 373953 81812013 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 1,621.76 5591458-4 320601 5591458 -7113 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 297.44 5546504 -1 320602 5546504 -7113 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20.19 9546705 -6 320603 9546705 -7/13 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 1,939.39 373954 818/2013 123898 CENTURYLINK 57.62 952 920 -8632 320604 8632 -7/13 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 355.89 952 927 -8861 320649 8861 -7113 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 123.99 952 831 -0024 320650 0024 -7/13 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 57.58 952 929 -0297 320651 0297 -7/13 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE - 41.86 320712 9246 -7/13 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.82 321259 0146 -7/13 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 60.52 321259 0146 -7/13 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 122.51 321259 0146 -7/13 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 144.14 321259 0146 -7/13 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 171.73 321259 0146 -7/13 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 193.37 321259 0146 -7/13 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 240.58 321259 0146 -7/13 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 6 8/812013 -8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 284.37 321259 0146 -7113 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 957.25 321259 0146 -7113 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,869.23 373955 8/812013 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 96.00 AIRWATCH LICENSES 320605 COM -0053 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 144.00 AIRWATCH LICENSES 320606 COM -0050 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 741.71 MICROSOFT OFFICE LICENSE 320607 COM -0051 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 48.00 AIRWATCH LICENSE 320713 COM -0055 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 2,868.26 NETWORK SWITCH 320714 COM -0046 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 48.00 AIRWATCH LICENSE 320715 COM -0056 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 450.00 BRAEMAR ABOUT TOWN AD 320716 COM -0032 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 4,395.97 373956 81812013 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 847.02 XCEL BILLING FOR LIFT STATION 00001597 320608 5620 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 847.02 373957 81812013 132522 CLAY- KING.COM INC. 159.12 CLAY TOOLS 00009271 321260 74745 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 159.12 373958 818/2013 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 153.60 321059 0148153324 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YOIRK SELLING 153.60 373959 81812013 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 24.05 ACRYLIC 00009265 321186 INV000078833 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,033.53 CLAY 00009266 321187 INV000078832 5110.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 92.71 STAIN 321188 R200388259 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,157.06 CLAY 00009269 321189 INV000079495 5110.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 107.90 BRUSHES, SPONGES 00009274 321190 INV000079736 5110.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,415.25 373960 81812013 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS MIDWE 525.08 CASTINGS 00001596 320609 5000029520 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 525.08 373961 81812013 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 13,565.85 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN /ENGINEERING 320652 39234 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 851.72 PREDESIGN 320653 39231 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 14,417.57 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/712013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 7 8/8/2013 -8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 373962 8/8/2013 100700 CURTIS 1000 - MIDWEST 669.87 POST -IT -NOTES 321191 3610152 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 669.87 373963 8/8/2013 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. 2,874.94 TURFACE QUICK DRY 00001523 321261 12047 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 895.61 HILLTOPPER MOUND CLAY 00001636 321262 12048 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 3,770.55 373964 818 12013 104020 DALCO 380.48 TOWEL DISPENSERS 00001532 321192 2628954 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 105.17 FLOOR CARE 00001454 321193 2630257 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 345.29 TOWELS, TISSUE 00001454 321194 2633889 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 127.18 TOWELS 00001505 321263 2624066 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 958.12 373965 81812013 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 51.35 ART WORK SOLD 320798 071013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 51.35 373966 8/8/2013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 89.60 320829 711989 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 784.20 320830 711991 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,112.20 321048 711985 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 88.70 321049 711986 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,713.55 321088 711990 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 41.60 321089 711988 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 386.50 321090 711987 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 418.95 321091 712399 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 418.95 321310 712406 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,054.25 373967 8/8/2013 124357 DELANEY, ALICE 62.40 ART WORK SOLD 320799 071013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 62.40 373968 818/2013 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 155.78 BAKERY 320717 467129 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 76.37 320718 467130 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 232.15 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8!7/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 8 8/8/2013 —8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 373969 81812013 132510 DERING PIERSON GROUP 28,731.10 COUNTRYSIDE PARK SHELTER PROJ 321229 APPL 1.0 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATH 28,731.10 373970 818/2013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 89.00 321195 650243624 -7/13 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 89.00 373971 8/812013 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,837.14 REFUSE 321264 544329 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,484.43 REFUSE 321265 544330 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 7,321.57 373972 81812013 121268 DIRR,ALEX 27.30 ART WORK SOLD 320800 071013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 27.30 373973 81812013 123942 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE INC. 20,900.00 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN 00005818 321266 073013 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 20,900.00 373974 8/8/2013 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 883.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 321267 32139 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 883.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 321267 32139 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 883.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 321267 32139 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,650.00 373975 818/2013 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 320801 071013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 373976 818/2013 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 49.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001655 320769 10118100 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 49.60 373977 81812013 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 38.83 HERITAGE AWARD PLAQUE 321196 89095 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 16.39 DENNYAWARDS 321197 89175 1130.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 55.22 373978 81812013 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 94.66 MANAGEMENT FEE 321198 080113 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Bf712013 9:21:56 Page- 9 Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT POOL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 8/8/2013 —818/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 94.66 373979 818/2013 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 1,896.03 MOTOR REPLACEMENT 00001577 320610 405251 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,896.03 373980 8/8/2013 100747 ELSMORE AQUATIC 362.50 GOGGLES 320719 77399 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 362.50 373981 81812013 130998 EMERSON, ANGELA 23.40 ART WORK SOLD 320802 071013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 23.40 373982 8/812013 132523 ENGINEERED SALES CO. 270.11 KILN PARTS 00001537 321268 115677 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS 270.11 373983 818/2013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 39.99 SEALS 320770 69- 107518 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 39.99 373984 8/8/2013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 3,339.61 FITTINGS 00001583 320611 0036873 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,250.20 METERS 00001583 320612 0035909 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,092.71 METERS 00001725 321199 0035909 -1 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,318.34 METERS, FLANGES 00001725 321200 0037519 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8,000.86 373985 81812013 102727 FORCE AMERICA 372.82 SENSOR COUPLERS 00005375 321201 01409626 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 372.82 373986 818/2013 103275 FORSETH, JOEL 150.01 DIESEL FUEL - TASK FORCE ONE 321060 073113 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 150.01 373987 8/812013 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 173.95 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 321269 080213 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 173.95 373988 81812013 1132514 FRYKMAN, NANCY Bf712013 9:21:56 Page- 9 Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT POOL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/812013 --8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 51.52 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 321270 REIMBURSE 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Page - 10 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF RANGE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 51.52 373989 81812013 132476 GAY ROBINSON CONSULTING 1,695.75 REGISTRATION - KAREN KURT 320654 CANADIAN 1120.6104 TRAINERS COLL 1,695.75 373990 8/8/2013 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 188.50 ARTWORK SOLD 320803 071013 5101.4413 188.50 373991 81812013 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 92.41 R -91 PHONE (2 MONTHS) 321061 4892918 1470.6188 92.41 373992 81812013 129787 GM CONTRACTING INC. 1,200.00 HYDRANT METER RENTAL REFUND 321271 080113 5901.4626 1,200.00 373993 818/2013 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,981.55 JULY 2013 SERVICE 00001723 321202 77015 5913.6103 1,981.55 373994 81812013 101103 GRAINGER 342.30 LIGHT BULBS 00002181 320720 9194965787 5720.6406 15.92 BANDAGES 00005440 320771 9198922909 1552.6406 46.28 ROD ENDS 00005194 320772 9200257773 1553.6530 91.22 NUMBERS & LETTERS 00001675 320773 9199976581 1322.6406 31.44 FLUORESCENT LAMPS 00001681 320774 9200886985 1552.6406 112.00 SHELF 321203 9201832251 7412.6406 639.16 373995 81812013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 493.50 321311 155212 5862.5513 493.50 373996 818/2013 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 110.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321272 080213 5840.6107 110.18 373997 818/2013 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Page - 10 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF RANGE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 8/712013 9:21:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 8/8/2013 —8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 104.04 GENERATOR WIRE 00001661 320775 967684731 5914.6530 REPAIR PARTS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 104.04 373998 81812013 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 299.88 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIRS 320776 132430 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 299.88 373999 8/8/2013 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 345.00 GOLF TEES 320721 50139 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 345.00 374000 81812013 100155 GRITTON, KAY 109.20 ART WORK SOLD 320804 071013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 109.20 374001 81812013 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/13/13 320722 072513 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 374002 8/8/2013 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 213.22 THERMAL ROLLS 320655 119117 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 21122 THERMAL ROLLS 321204 119102 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 426.44 374003 818/2013 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,606.55 AUG 2013 PREMIUIM 321205 6410440 -9 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,606.55 374004 8/812013 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,949.47 _CHEMICALS 00001250 320613 3494559 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,475.29 CHLORINE, CAUSTIC SODA 320723 3491590 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 7,204.80 CHEMICALS 00001250 321206 3496379 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 11.629.56 374005 81812013 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 424.08 PIPE, FLARED END 00001666 320614 B261371 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 905.66 METER BOXES 00001595 320615 8261177 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 1,329.74 374006 81812013 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 321.80 PIZZA 320724 1062704 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 321.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 320831 659512 5842.5514 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 914.50 321050 659190 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register 689.00 321092 659191 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8/8/2013 — 8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374007 81812013 321273 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 370.64 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 320725 024673 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 153.12 374008 81812013 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,275.00 TEMPO EMT REFRESHER COURSES 320726 30205 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 2,275.00 374009 81812013 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 320727 30254 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,475.08 374010 8/8/2013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 678.57 ROOM & BOARD 320616 1000032691 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 678.57 374011 8/8/2013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,013.95 JULY 2013 BOOKING FEES 321207 1000033069 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES 1,013.95 374012 81812013 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 321208 1000032987 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 160.31 374013 81812013 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 5,700.00 PROMOTIONAL TESTING 321062 00291946 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,700.00 374014 8/8/2013 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 303.79 MOPS, OT CLEANER 00002184 320728 600780351 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 303.79 374015 8/812013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 8f712013 9:21:56 Page - 12 Business Unit GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,476.00 320831 659512 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 914.50 321050 659190 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 689.00 321092 659191 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,079.50 374016 8/8/2013 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 370.64 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321273 080113 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 370.64 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/712013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 13 8/8/2013 —8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Po ft Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 374017 81812013 132516 HURKADI, BASU 75.00 LEAK BY WATER METER 321274 080213 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 75.00 374018 81812013 130873 HUSNIK, MATT 21.50 LICENSE UPGRADE 321275 073113 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 21.50 374019 81812013 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,044.20 CONCESSION PRODUCT 320729 2202961 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,044.20 374020 8/8/2013 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 7,490.30 VFD REPLACEMENT 00001366 320617 5898 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 7,490.30 374021 81812013 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 453.53 MAIL LATE NOTICES 321276 80043 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 453.53 374022 8/812013 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 435.00 321312 13450 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 435.00 374023 81812013 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 10.26 FITTINGS 00001660 320618 787364 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 10.26 374024 81812013 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 199.75 POSTERS 320730 94961 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 199.75 374025 8/8/2013 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 398.10 EMBROIDERED SHOULDER EMBLEMS 320731 31377 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 398.10 374026 81812013 132518 IVORY, THETPHEL 100.00 ART WORK SOLD /BEST IN SHOW 321277 071513 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 100.00 374027 81812013 102146 JESSEN PRESS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 267.19 LETTERHEAD 1,122.19 ARBLE SUMMER BROCHURE 1,389.38 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/8/2013 -8/8/2013 Doc No Inv No Account No 321209 37247 1550.6406 321210 38626 1629.6575 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING 8/712013 9:21:56 Page - 14 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION 374028 8/8/2013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 12,251.75 321093 2108918 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 38.80 321094 2108919 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,438.60 321095 2108907 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,322.20 321096 2108903 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 22.40- 321097 2108917 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21,028.95 374029 818/2013 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW - 3701'FULLER ST 321278 ED121834 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 374030 81812013 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW - 5108 59TH ST 321279 ED122235 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 374033 818/2013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 287.72 320832 1628306 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.88- 320833 585289 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.73- 321051 585605 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.00- 321052 585606 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,929.15 321098 1634142 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 489.90 321099 1634140 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,251.48 321100 1634135 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,521.83 321101 1634158 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .28 321102 1634139 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,212.32 321103 1634157 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,448.46 321104 1634160 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 94.11 321105 1634161 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 648.18 321106 1634164 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,187.92 321107 1634136 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,362.08 321108 1634148 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,649.39 321109 1634150 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,785.25 321110 1634153 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.99 321111 1634154 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.40 321112 1634138 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10,789.29 321113 1634149 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,419.91 321114 1634151 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 817/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 15 8/8/2013 -8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 98.11 321115 1634152 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,053.27 321116 1634155 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20.00- 321117 585266 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 15.88- 321118 585287 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.41- 321119 585283 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.11- 321120 585284 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16.00- 321121 585285 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 21.10- 321122 584309 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 13.83- 321123 584308 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 21.66- 321124 585604 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8.27- 321125 585603 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,335.26 321313 1634137 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,212.32 321314 1634134 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 474.85 321315 1634141 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 93.73 321316 1634143 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,189.60 321317 1634133 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,498.95 321318 1634156 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,024.42 321319 1634159 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,747.38 321320 1634162 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.99 321321 1634163 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 321322 1634144 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 62,679.79 374034 8/812013 123696 JOHNSTON, TORI 57.85 ARTWORK SOLD 320805 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 57.85 374035 61812013 132519 JONES, CHIP 75.00 ART WORK SOLD /MERIT AWARD 321280 071513 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 75.00 374036 81812013 111018 KEEPRS INC. 33.69 UNIFORMS 00003647 321063 221364 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.58 00003628 321064 221175 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 268.48 00003649 321065 221778 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 267.95 00003647 321066 221364 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 30.01 00003648 321067 221704 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL , 681.71 374037 81812013 132512 KNUTSON DEVELOPMENT 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW -5712 BEARD AVE 321281 ED121988 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 817/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 16 8/8/2013 —818/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 374038 8/812013 100354 LAGUNA CLAY CO. 927.69 CLAY 00009268 321211 177906 5110.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 927.69 374039 8/8/2013 121656 LAVEN, JANE 66.95 ART WORK SOLD 320806 071013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 66.95 374040 8/8/2013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 30.03 DRILL BITS 00001610 320777 9301800346 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 331.42 TY -RAP, FITTINGS, SCREWS 00005399 320778 9301797129 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 361.45 374041 8/812013 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 30.00 ONLINE CLASS TRAINING 320656 184255 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30.00 374042 818/2013 132515 LICHTENBERGER, JOSEPH 106.08 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 321282 4504 ARDEN AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 106.08 374043 8/8/2013 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 152.01 REIMBURSE FOR FUEL 321283 080213 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 152.01 374044 81812013 100858 LOGIS 1,759.00 320619 36939 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,717.00 320619 36939 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,289.00 320619 36939 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,336.00 320619 36939 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,406.00 320619 36939 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,591.00 320619 36939 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,384.00 320619 36939 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 28,482.00 374045 818/2013 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,214.68 321323 157205 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,214.68 374046 8/8/2013 101928 MCKENZIE, THOMAS 105.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 320732 073113 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/8/2013 —8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 105.97 374047 818/2013 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC. 1,489.53 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003644 321068 30719 1470.6510 1,489.53 374048 8/8/2013 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 288.75 CITY OF LAKES TRIP 320620 5 ADDITIONAL 1628.6103.07 288.75 374049 8/812013 103720 MEDTECH 110.40 WRISTBANDS 320733 IN000411303 5311.6406 110.40 374050 8/8/2013 101483 MENARDS 35.61 SLEDGEHAMMER, UTILITY KNIVES 00001521 320779 29913 1301.6556 53.41 LIGHT KIT 00001521 320780 29912 4090.6406 40.32 WINDOW WASHING SUPPLIES 00001626 321212 31239 1551.6406 129.34 374051 8/8/2013 100885 METRO SALES INC 116.53 STAPLES 321213 83979A 1550.6230 116.53 374052 818/2013 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 98.00 FOAMING HAND SOAP 00001531 321215 SOI- 015252 5311.6406 98.00 FOAMING HAND SOAP 321216 SOI- 015468 5311.6406 196.01 FOAMING HAND SOAP 321217 SOI -015739 1551.6406 392.01 374053 81812013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,347.50 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001599 320621 34486 5913.6180 1,837.50 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001722 321214 34489 5913.6180 3,185.00 374054 81812013 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 25,719.84 WATER PURCHASE 321284 431 - 0005.300 -8/ 5913.6601 13 25,719.84 374055 8/812013 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.34 WINDOW WASHING 320657 928013373 5821.6180 8f7/2013 9:21:56 Page- 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 817/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 18 8/812013 —8/8/2013 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 16.09 320658 928013037 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 21.38 321218 928013036 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 42.81 374056 81812013 127320 MINNESOTA CIT OFFICER'S ASSOCI 1,250.00 MOA CIT CERTIFICATION (2) 320734 20130725 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,250.00 374057 81812013 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 81.90 CLAY UNDERGLAZE 00009276 321219 75963 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 187.20 TURNTABLE BANDING WHEELS 00009279 321220 76064 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 269.10 374058 81812013 100906 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 8.00 HANDICAPS 320735 45- 0150 -21 -7/13 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 198.00 320736 45- 0150 -13 -7/13 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 1,848.00 320737 45- 0150 -16 -7/13 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 2,054.00 374059 818/2013 106430 MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY 315.86 BEAMS, FRAMES, WIRE DECKS 00005187 320781 M60731 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 315.86 374060 8/8/2013 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 64.16 VALVES 00002393 321221 0100613 -IN 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 64.16 374061 8/812013 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 52.75 POSTCARDS 320738 13762 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 52.75 374062 8/8/2013 132477 MOHN, KIRSTEN 54.00 PARK & REC PROGRAM REFUND 320739 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 54.00 374063 81812013 132613 MSI CUSTOM HOMES 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW - 5316 BROOKVIEW 321285 ED 121494 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 374064 81812013 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,378.48 HYDRAULIC MOTOR ASSEMBLY 00005401 320782 917884 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,378.48 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/812013 -8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374065 8/8/2013 132517 NAPLAN,ALLAN 200.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 321286 7217 OAKLAWN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND AVE 200.00 374066 81812013 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 8f7/2013 9:21:56 Page - 19 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 105.50 321126 83150 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 601.00 321324 83490 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 315.00 321325 83491 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,021.50 374067 8/8/2013 132509 NOLAN, MARK 40.39 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321222 080113 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 40.39 374068 81812013 102260 NORMAN, MIKE 66.95 ARTWORK SOLD 320807 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 66.95 374069 81812013 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 495.56 STROBES, LIGHTS 00005373 320783 33984 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 495.56 374070 8/812013 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. - 668.11 ART SUPPLIES 321351 44176101 5120.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 41.95 321352 44160901 5120.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 10.20 321353 44382500 5120.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 77.28 321354 44448000 5120.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 267.37- 321355 44367900 5120.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 12.79 321356 44360501 5120.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 13.03- 321357 44382000 5120.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 529.93 374071 818/2013 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 81.44 THERMAL PAPER 320740 668222914001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 81.44 374072 8/812013 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 33.80 ART WORK SOLD 320808 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 33.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 81712013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page- 20 8/8/2013 - 8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 374073 8/8/2013 130333 O'MALLEY,MARYANNE 31.20 ART WORK SOLD 320809 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.20 374074 8/8/2013 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 22.43 ART WORK SOLD 320810 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.43 374075 818/2013 102440 PASS, GRACE 139.75 ART WORK SOLD 320811 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 139.75 374076 818/2013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,693.26 320834 8409727 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,712.60 321127 8409722 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 70.50 321128 8407915 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 521.75 321129 8409726 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,198.11 374077 81812013 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 MONTHLY FEE 321223 25303929 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 374078 8/8/2013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 632.35 320741 10553768 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 238.76 320742 10553835 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 440.30 320835 10781912 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,311.41 374078 8/812013 106806 PERFORMANCE KENNELS INC. 38.48 REHYDRATE TABS 321287 2488 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 38.48 374080 8/8/2013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 7.00- 320836 3509221 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 227.95 321130 2462967 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 544.21 321131 2462963 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,249.51 321132 2462972 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 453.44 321133 2462964 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 648.80 321134 2462970 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 283.43 321135 2462974 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 786.96 321136 2462971 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 21 8/8/2013 -8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 16.00- 321137 3509220 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 46.12 321326 2462966 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 61.60 321327 2462965 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,318.40 321328 2462975 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 705.00 321329 2462973 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,302.42 374081 818/2013 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 69.47 COMMITTEE GROUP PHOTO 321224 071813 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 69.47 374082 81812013 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 301.72 OFF ROAD SERVICE 00005308 320784 210069818 1553.6180 - CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.44 BULK FOAM 00003638 321069 210069476 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 360.16 374083 81812013 131054 POSCH, CATHY 67.04 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 301517 7117 CORNELIA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DR 67.04 374084 81812013 129593 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT T 125.00 REGISTRATION -JEFF ELASKY 320743 Q941 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 125.00 374085 8/812013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 407.07 NITRILE GLOVES, TISSUE, TOWELS00002178 320744 6267 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 203.77 SQUEEGEES, SANITIZERS 00002177 320745 6262 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 800.91 TISSUE, TOWELS, GLOVES 00002005 321225 6275 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 134.71 DOOR LATCHES 00002005 321226 6273 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,546.46 374086 818/2013 100186 PROULX, ADAM 50.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 320746 073113 5710.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 50.40 374087 818/2013 126424 QUINN, MATTHEW 37.70 ART WORK SOLD 320812 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 37.70 374088 81812013 132506 RAD ZOO, THE 215.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/08/13 321070 073013 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 817/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 22 8/8/2013 -8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 250.00 215.00 374093 818/2013 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 374089 8/812013 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY 50.32 WIRINGADAPTER 00005192 320785 1927442516 1553.6530 500.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 320622 073013 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 100.61 500.00 374094 8/812013 374090 8/812013 125321 REACH WITH ME 18,220.72 HORNETS NEST PROJECT 320659 1207021810 5500.1705 931.00 KID N' PLAY PROGRAM 321286 8112 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 374095 81812013 931.00 113372 RONNING, TED 374091 8/8/2013 320749 101698 RECREONICS 5760.6136 150.00 579.76 STAIRS FOR LADDERS 00001649 320747 640352 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 579.76 427.50 CLEAR SEWER PIPE 320750 04817206319. 5311.6180 374092 8/8/2013 132197 REVLOCAL 374097 8/8/2013 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 250.00 PAY - PER -CLICK CAMPAIGN 320748 RE- 39MRB7H4M -7/ 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDUCATION PROGRAMS EDUCATION PROGRAMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE POOL OPERATION SENIOR CITIZENS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 13 250.00 374093 818/2013 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 50.32 WIRINGADAPTER 00005192 320785 1927442516 1553.6530 50.29 RING LOCKS 00005192 320786 1927442517 1553.6530 100.61 374094 8/812013 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 18,220.72 HORNETS NEST PROJECT 320659 1207021810 5500.1705 18,220.72 374095 81812013 113372 RONNING, TED 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/12113 320749 072513 5760.6136 150.00 374096 81812013 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 427.50 CLEAR SEWER PIPE 320750 04817206319. 5311.6180 427.50 374097 8/8/2013 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 8.20 101" ""'9350 320623 072513 1628.6406 79.80 101" ""'9350 320623 072513 1513.6218 159.60 101" "•'•9350 320624 072713 1513.6218 247.60 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDUCATION PROGRAMS EDUCATION PROGRAMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE POOL OPERATION SENIOR CITIZENS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES PARKING RAMP 285.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 320625 073013 CITY OF EDINA DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS R55CKREG LOG20000 285.00 374106 81812013 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 374102 8/8/2013 Council Check Register 183.30 ART WORK SOLD 320815 071113 8/8/2013 —8/8/2013 ART WORK SOLD Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374098 8/812013 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 374103 8/8/2013 100995 SEH 293.84 COUPLERS 00005404 320787 P22934 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 1,651.85 293.84 321228 270576 1001.4722 374099 8/8/2013 1,651.85 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 131.04 40.63 ART WORK SOLD 320813 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.63 15000 CL PERFORMANCE 8111113 374100 8/8/2013 5760.6136 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 762.54 QUARTERLY SERVICE BILLING 321227 8103528120 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 762.54 374101 8/8/2013 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES PARKING RAMP 285.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 320625 073013 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 285.00 374106 81812013 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 374102 8/8/2013 127490 SCULLY, PAT 183.30 ART WORK SOLD 320815 071113 117.00 ART WORK SOLD 320814 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 117.00 374107 81812013 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 374103 8/8/2013 100995 SEH ADOBE 00004342 320626 801167574 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 1,651.85 ANTENNA PROJECTS 321228 270576 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 1,651.85 131.04 ARTWORK SOLD 320816 374104 81812013 103249 SHANNON, JIM ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15000 CL PERFORMANCE 8111113 320751 072513 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 374105 8/812013 103249 SHANNON, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/13/13 320752 073113 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 374106 81812013 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 183.30 ART WORK SOLD 320815 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 183.30 374107 81812013 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 287.49 ADOBE 00004342 320626 801167574 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 287.49 374108 81812013 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 131.04 ARTWORK SOLD 320816 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8/8/2013 - 8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 131.04 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 374110 8/8/2013 YORK SELLING 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 315.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 320837 1058148 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,443.37 320838 1059278 5862.5513 12.62 320839 1059277 5862.5512 .50 321138 1053327 5842.5512 1,614.61 321139 1059271 5842.5512 1.00 321140 1059270 5842.5512 2,194.10 321141 1059273 5842.5512 6,833.00 321142 1059274 5842.5513 1,616.50 321143 1059275 5842.5513 4,261.50 321144 1059272 5842.5513 40.62 321145 1059279 5862.5515 397.63 321146 1059267 5822.5512 619.50 321147 1059266 5822.5513 298.50 321148 1059269 5822.5513 1,974.72 321330 1060744 5842.5513 2,816.50 321331 1059268 5822.5513 161.00 321332 1060745 5862.5513 8,781.00 321333 1059281 5862.5513 1,030.00 321334 1059282 5862.5513 1,757.87 321335 1059280 5862.5512 198.45 321336 1059283 5862.5512 36,367.99 374111 818/2013 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI 7,161.44 THIRD QUARTER 320821 201312 1132.6136 7,161.44 374112 8/8/2013 110977 SOW, ADAMA 198.25 ART WORK SOLD 320817 071113 5101.4413 198.25 374113 8/812013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 40.70 METER NIPPLES 00001576 320788 S2759359.001 5917.6530 615.29 REPLACE WATER HEATER 00001671 321071 S2761920.001 5821.6406 65.74 PILOT SPARK IGNITOR 321230 S2760224.001 7411.6530 721.73 374114 8/8/2013 128187 ST PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT 139.00 TRAINING - 10/30/13 320753 SCOTT KUYPER 1400.6104 817/2013 9:21:56 Page - 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CABLE COMMISSION ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ART CENTER REVENUES METER REPAIR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 600.00 ABOUT TOWN COLUMNS CITY OF EDINA 322 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS Council Check Register 8/8/2013 —818/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 155.00 FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICE 139.00 1303897 5311.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 374115 81812013 105136 STANDARD WATER CONTROL SYSTEMS 374121 89.43 PERMIT REFUND 321289 ED123001 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS 89.43 800.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE AD 320755 1448391 374116 8/8/2013 GOLF ADMINISTRATION 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 195.16 EDINA LIQUOR AD 320790 1450820 5862.6122 1,017.66 EDINA LIQUOR AD 321290 073113 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 320790 1450820 1,017.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 321290 073113 5622.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINA LIQUOR AD 320790 1,017.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 321290 073113 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,385.50 3,053.00 374122 374117 8/8/2013 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 129409 STEEN, BARB 57.20 ARTWORK SOLD 320818 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD CONTINGENCIES 57.20 14,620.00 374118 8/812013 374123 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 150.00 REMOVE ALL DECALS 320789 632835 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6502 -RGR 5422.6540 150.00 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,340.21 374119 8/812013 100593 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Page - 25 Business Unit INSPECTIONS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 600.00 ABOUT TOWN COLUMNS 321231 322 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 600.00 374120 81812013 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 155.00 FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICE 320754 1303897 5311.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 155.00 374121 8/8/2013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 800.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE AD 320755 1448391 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 195.16 EDINA LIQUOR AD 320790 1450820 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 195.17 EDINA LIQUOR AD 320790 1450820 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 195.17 EDINA LIQUOR AD 320790 1450820 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 1,385.50 374122 818/2013 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 14,620.00 VIBES PROJECT 321232 67082 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 14,620.00 374123 81812013 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 1,340.21 LIQUID FERTILIZER 321291 6502 -RGR 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,340.21 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 26 8/8/2013 -818/20`13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 374124 8/8/2013 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 320819 071113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 374125 8/8/2013 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 320756 497708 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 40.00 374126 8/812013 129564 TAKALO, CRAIG 324.00 MODEL 321292 060213 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 324.00 374127 8/812013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 521.00 320840 00771174 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 182.00- 320841 766379CR 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 152.15 321053 767836 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,605.05 321054 767837 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,096.20 374128 8/812013 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 50,947.44 VIDEO CONFERENCING UPGRADE 00003544 321072 723 -1 421460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT 2,782.71 SERVICES COMPLETED 00003544 321073 723 -2 421460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT 53,730.15 374129 818/2013 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 1,560.00 FITNESS TRAINING 321074 70113 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,560.00 374130 81812013 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 321293 2013 -88739 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 321293 2013 -88739 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 321293 2013 -88739 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 990.00 374131 8/8/2013 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 384.60 COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 321233 M19910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 384.60 374132 818/2013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 448.88 WELDING WIRE, HELMET 00005365 320791 146178 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 167.13 WELDING GAS 00005371 320792 146699 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 8/7/2013 9:21:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 8/8/2013 - 8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 616.01 374133 8/812013 116535 TRAVELERS 4,955.00 DEDUCTIBLE 321294 000442550 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,955.00 374134 81812013 124597 TUORILA, SHERYL 103.35 ARTWORK SOLD 320820 071113 6101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 103.35 374135 818/2013 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 172.46 FLASHERS 00005403 320793 JI77546 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 172.46 374136 81812013 132524 TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION 2,500.00 ADVERTISING TPT2 321295 SPNO03849 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,500.00 374137 818/2013 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) 2,217.66 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 321296 112494910 -001 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 2,217.66 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 321297 112494883 -001 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 4,435.32 374138 81812013 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC 598.39 WHITE FIELD PAINT 321298 1501 - 000831 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 265.49 ANCHOR SUPREME BASE SET 00001638 321299 150 - 0002818 -01 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 863.88 374139 8/812013 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 48.92 SHIP WATER SAMPLES 00001721 321234 TRAN:2560 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 48.92 374140 81812013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 111.67 CAN LINERS, SOAP, UTENSILS 320660 278462 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 363.50 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS 320660 278462 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 49.62 CAN LINERS 320661 281162 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 381.88 LIQUOR BAGS 320661 281162 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 101.34 CAN LINERS 321235 280599 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 60.66 LIQUOR BAGS, CAN LINERS 321236 281166 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 617.79 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 321237 281165 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,686.46 R55CKREG LOG20000 321149 0081354 -IN 5842.5513 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 407.51 321150 0081358 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register 321151 0081359 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 111.75 8/8/2013 -8/812013 5822.5515 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374141 8/812013 0081357 -IN 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 875.00 GOLF CART RENTAL 00006210 320757 68929 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 381.64 61.35 WIRE ASSEMBLIES 00002002 321238 68624 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS 30.67 SWITCHES 00002002 321239 68782 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS 195.78 27.84 SOLENOID 00002002 321240 68787 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS 994.86 321153 336173 -00 374142 81812013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 15.02 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001670 320794 7492660 1301.6556 TOOLS 19.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001670 320794 7492660 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 305.84 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001670 320794 7492660 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.51 BOLTS, CONNECTORS 321241 7458011 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.51 BOLTS, CONNECTORS 321241 7458011 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 941.21 374143 818/2013 119454 VINOCOPIA 817/2013 9:21:56 Page - 28 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 572.00 321149 0081354 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 407.51 321150 0081358 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.50 321151 0081359 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 111.75 321152 0081355 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 240.83 321337 0081356 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 82.50 321338 0081357 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 374144 8/8/2013 COST OF GOODS SOLD 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 779.63 CONCESSION PRODUCT 320758 36926978 311.72 CONCESSION PRODUCT 320759 36949396 1,159.76 CONCESSION PRODUCT 320760 37173041 2,445.09 CONCESSION PRODUCT 320761 36949756 1,553.59 CONCESSION PRODUCT 320762 37141614 6,249.79 374145 8/8/2013 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 381.64 REGISTRATION CARD RECEIPTS 321242 58417 381.64 374146 8/8/2013 132521 WHITED, COURTNEY 195.78 DUPLICATE CHARGE ON ACCT 321300 REFUND 195.78 374147 81812013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 477.90 321153 336173 -00 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5110.6575 PRINTING 5301.4532 5822.5513 SEASON TICKETS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 817/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 29 8/8/2013 -8/8/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,775.80 321339 336319 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,553.70 321340 336325 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,807.40 374148 8/812013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,836.32 321154 465477 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,180.72 321155 465475 5622.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.68 321341 465666 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 605.60 321342 465667 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,687.95 321343 465478 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,312.27 374149 81812013 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 WEB - AUG 2013 321301 1130 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.24 374151 8/812013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,222.06 320842 1080065138 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 218.40 321156 1080067796 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,085.11 321157 1080067795 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,839.42 321158 1080067794 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10,109.60 321159 1080067797 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 343.15 321160 1080065950 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,410.25 321161 1080067773 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,457.67 321162 1080067771 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,213.25 321163 1080067772 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 120.00- 321164 2080011656 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.00- 321165 2080011674 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 60.00- 321166 2080011676 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 100.00- 321167 2080011688 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 88.00- 321168 2080011692 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 161.50- 321169 2080011702 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 105.00- 321170 2080011723 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 33.00- 321171 2080011670 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR .50TH ST SELLING 11.15- 321172 2080007791 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 19.26- 321173 2080010083 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 19.85- 321174 2080010527 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,899.09 321344 1080067769 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,934.85 321345 1080067768 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,626.95 321346 1080067853 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,037.20 321347 1080067770 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 46,643.24 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 30 8/8/2013 -81812013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 374152 81812013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 480.00 320843 1090084797 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,446.00 320844 1090084798 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 64.50 320845 1090085582 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 232.00 320846 1090085581 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 118.70 320847 1090083808 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5,096.45 321175 1090085500 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 316.00 321176 1090087943 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,854.25 321177 1090087942 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 321178 1090087941 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 72.00 321179 1090087880 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 80.25- 321180 2090024470 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 129.00 321348 1090087878 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,349.00 321349 1090087877 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 16,099.15 374153 818/2013 129856 WISCONSIN PHYSICIANS SERVICE 391.54 121061 - MARVIN MOORE 321243 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REFUND 403.92 121395 - MARVIN MOORE 321243 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REFUND 795.46 374154 8/812013 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 261.46 MINI GOLF BALLS 00002003 321244 300303 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 261.46 374155 81812013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 3,207.50 6500 FRANCE SENIOR HOUSING 320662 2- 01686 -430 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 2,030.00 SOUTHDALE MED TRAFFIC STUDY 320663 1- 01686450 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 5,237.50 374157 8/8/2013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 766.50 51- 9251919 -0 320627 377355371 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 2,100.03 51- 5107681 -4 320628 377128151 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 3,075.31 51- 5547446 -1 320629 377139058 1626.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 147.73 51- 9608462 -5 320630 377192553 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2,667.71 51- 9011854 -4 320631 377181817 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 201.27 51- 01934794 320632 377055006 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 41.60 51- 8976004 -9 320633 377180950 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 34,424.74 51- 4621797 -2 320634 377288600 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CITY OF EDINA 8/7/2013 9:21:56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 8/8/2013 -8/812013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 30.68 51- 0160483 -1 320635 376895655 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 32.16 51- 0223133 -2 320636 376896190 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 45.02 51- 8997917 -7 320637 377034781 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 23.90 51- 9770163 -6 320638 377048039 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 94.70 51- 9770164 -7 320639 377041244 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 42.21 51- 0194596 -8 320640 376894204 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 89.25 51- 6692497 -0 320641 377005160 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 16.70 51- 6541084 -2 320642 377002114 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.28 51- 8102668 -0 320643 377338752 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 168.71 51- 8987646 -8 320644 377182026 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 57.95 51- 4420190 -3 320645 376810090 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 224.98 51- 6223269 -1 320646 377146604 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 14.29 51- 6050184 -2 320647 376999153 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 11,567.55 51- 6955679 -8 320664 377371743 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 612.64 51- 6229265 -9 320665 377496064 1481.6185 - LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 2,508.67 51- 6229265 -9 320665 377496064 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 579.50 51- 6046826 -0 320666 377490477 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 199.93 51- 5938955 -6 320667 377489552 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 186.21 51- 9337452 -8 320668 377543763 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 11,018.11 51- 4827232 -6 320669 377470545 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 4,206.46 51- 4159265 -8 321245 376961284 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 35,231.66 51- 4888627 -1 321302 377837937 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 110,414.45 374158 8/8/2013 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 235.45 JULY USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 321246 069299870 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 235.45 374159 81812013 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 16,278.50 UNLEADED FUEL 00005191 320795 568860 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16,278.50 374160 8/812013 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 149.00 321350 12180 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 149.00 374161 8/812013 132479 ZEULI, ANTHONY 15.00 PAID TWICE - FIREARM TRAINING 320763 REFUND 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 15.00 795,536.12 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/7/2013 9:21:56 Council Check Register Page - 32 8/812013 —8/812013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Check Total 795,536.12 Total Payments 795,536.12 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/7/2013 9:26:02 Council Check Summary Page - 1 8/8/2013 - 8/8/2013 Company Amount 01000 GENERALFUND 193,150.37 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 36,416.36 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 74,917.64 05100 ART CENTER FUND 12,641.64 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 17,504.56 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 26,635.28 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 8.711.34 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 53,839.30 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 1,818.14 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,629.20 05800 LIQUOR FUND 249,660.19 05900 UTILITY FUND 86,385.30 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,190.82 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 22,229.43 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 2,200.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,606.55 Report Totals 795,536.12 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll es and Procedures d R55CKREG LOG20000 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER CITY OF EDINA 205.73 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 321359 Council Check Register 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 173.14 RADIO REPAIRS 321627 8115/2013 - 8/1512013 CONTRACTED REPAIRS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374162 8/1512013 124613 ABM JANITORIAL- NORTH CENTRAL r 319.28 CONCESSION PRODUCT 2,885.36 AUG 2013 SERVICE 321797 5581637 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOOD 321500 2,885.36 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 71.75 BEEF FRANKS 374163 8/15/2013 5421.5510 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY GRILL 91.25- CREDIT 321502 1967780 5421.5510 54.80 GRILL 321667 1707473 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 54.80 374164 8/15/2013 129458 ACME TOOLS 39.98 TUFF TOES 00001685 321452 2057274 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.98 374165 811512013 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 34,192.80 RECYCLING 321735 3256557 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 34,192.80 374166 8/1512013 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 254.47 COFFEE 321358 156816 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 254.47 374167 811512013 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 68.61 321586 073113 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 104.83 321586 073113 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 144.22 321586 073113 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 151.76 321586 073113 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 161.86 321586 073113 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 299.12 321586 073113 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 397.03 321586 073113 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page- 1 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE RECYCLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 374168 811512013 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 205.73 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 321359 39328 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 173.14 RADIO REPAIRS 321627 39471 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT, GENERAL 378.87 374169 811512013 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 319.28 CONCESSION PRODUCT 321360 1970017 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 555.30 FOOD 321500 1969947 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 71.75 BEEF FRANKS 321501 1971273 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 91.25- CREDIT 321502 1967780 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 108.79 POPCORN 00002012 321736 1970016 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 963.87 R55CKREG LOG20000 321668 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,375.00 Council Check Register 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 374170 811512013 RUBBISH REMOVAL 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 33.28 321362 080113 1481.6182 58.64 HOSE PIPE, CLAMPS 00001547 321503 59900 1318.6406 080113 5111.6182 58.64 ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 56.55 321362 374171 811512013 RUBBISH REMOVAL 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 66.29 321362 080113 1470.6182 311.58 COFFEE 321361 1080791 1550.6406 080113 1628.6182 311.58 SENIOR CITIZENS 73.92 321362 374172 811512013 RUBBISH REMOVAL 132589 ARIZON STRUCTURES WORLDWIDE LL 108.88 321362 080113 5861.6182 171,521.84 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321829 APPL 1 5200.1727 080113 1645.6182 171,521.84 LITTER REMOVAL 162.79 321362 374173 8115/2013 RUBBISH REMOVAL 132589 ARIZON STRUCTURES WORLDWIDE LL 207.79 321362 080113 1551.6182 137,350.29 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321830 APPL 2 5200.1727 080113 1301.6182 137,350.29 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 208.32 321362 374174 8/16/2013 RUBBISH REMOVAL 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 217.25 321362 080113 5422.6182 33.16 ADHESIVE 00001682 321504 10058196 1552.6406 080113 5511.6182 33.16 ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 301.70 321362 374175 8/1512013 RUBBISH REMOVAL 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME GOLF DOME GENERALSUPPLIES 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 2 Business Unit SNOW & ICE REMOVAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,375.00 321668 25248 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,375.00 374176 811512013 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 321362 080113 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 321362 080113 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 321362 080113 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 56.55 321362 080113 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 66.29 321362 080113 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.66 321362 080113 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 73.92 321362 080113 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 108.88 321362 080113 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 117.76 321362 080113 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 162.79 321362 080113 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 207.79 321362 080113 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 208.31 321362 080113 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 208.32 321362 080113 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 217.25 321362 080113 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 269.56 321362 080113 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 301.70 321362 080113 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION CITY OF EDINA 8/1412013 8:36:37 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309.03 321362 080113 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 399.03 321362 080113 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 646.03 321362 080113 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 258.54 321737 8/01/13 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 3,791.40 374177 8/15/2013 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 2,700.00 BUILD UP NEW SQUAD 321363 3959 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 3,760.20 BUILD UP NEW SQUAD 321364 3961 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 15,507.00 BUILD UP NEW SQUADS 321365 3960 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 21, 967.20 374178 811512013 100638 BACHMAN'S 1,027.50 TREES 00006459 321505 50003/1 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 615.91 TREES 00006466 321506 50238/1 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,643.41 374179 8/15/2013 120814 BAGGALLINI INC. 35.00 GOLF BAG 321587 IVC00595605 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 35.00 374180 811512013 132576 BARDEN, CHRIS 16.20 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 321738 3605 W 55TH ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 16.20 374181 811512013 130702 BARKLEY, TRAVIS 400.00 JR LEAGUE GOLF INSTRUCTION 321809 080513 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 400.00 374182 811512013 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 240.00 LEGAL FEES 321588 119571 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 240.00 LEGAL FEES 321589 119570 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 480.00 374183 8/1512013 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 5.35 BATTERIES 321739 020- 275726 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 5.35 374184 8/15/2013 100645 BEACON ATHLETICS 710.00 FIELD PAINT 321366 0430104 -IN 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 710.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374185 8/1512013 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 1,464.01 NEW HOCKEY GOAL FRAMES 00008028 321367 00094610 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,464.01 374186 8/15/2013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 8/1412013 8:36:37 Page - 4 Business Unit ARENA ICE MAINT 73.10 321772 30083400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 657.30 321773 30083500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 230.65 321774 88867500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 399.60 321775 30085200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 140.55 321776 79295600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 374187 811512013 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 583.54 AUG 2013 SERVICE 321740 141509 7411.6136 583.54 374188 8115/2013 125139 BERNICK'S 352.00 321669 76072 5842.5514 352.00 374189 8/1512013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 191.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003000 321368 WO- 868980 -1 1400.6513 53.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 321369 OE- 326399 -1 1550.6406 21.29 PENS 321453 OE- 325429 -1 1260.6406 267.01 374190 811512013 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 9,187.50 LANNON STONE REPAIR 321590 2013 1344.6180 9,187.50 374191 8/1512013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 57.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 321507 89045 1552.6406 57.22 374192 811512013 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 657.00 321670 114768 5862.5513 508.50 321671 114850 5842.5513 1,165.50 374193 811512013 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 1,288.43 FUEL TANK, BAND ASSEMBLIES 00005380 321370 766288 1553.6530 246.43- CREDIT 00005347 321812 CM755676 1553.6530 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/1512013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 177.13- CREDIT 00005409 321813 CM768812 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 121.88- CREDIT 00005380 321814 CM766288 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 44010.1705 01398.1705.21 9234.6103 9234.6103 1554.6107 5760.6136 1642.6103 5862.6575 5822.6575 5842.6575 5761.6620 5760.6136 5761.6511 5761.6530 1647.6103 5421.5514 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSULTING INSPECTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page- 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PW FACILITY FUEL CANOPY LAKE EDINA B GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING FIELD MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 742.99 374194 8/15/2013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 316.25 MATERIALS TESTING 321454 371436 1,096.00 MATERIALS TESTING 321455 372204 3,004.15 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 321628 370962 9,378.75 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 321629 372326 13,795.15 374195 811512013 131731 BROWNING, RYAN 461.61 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321591 080513 461.61 374196 8/15/2013 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/20/13 321583 080113 200.00 374197 8/1512013 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 398.10 AG -LIME 321815 073113 398.10 374198 8/1512013 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 176.26 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 321508 31928 176.27 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 321508 31928 176.27 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 321508 31928 528.80 374199 811512013 122074 BUIE, BARB 1.92 PETTY CASH 321509 080513 35.39 PETTY CASH 321509 080513 64.67 PETTY CASH 321509 080513 83.68 PETTY CASH 321509 080513 185.66 374200 811512013 123615 CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT INC. 4,377.60 GEESE MANAGEMENT 321630 2013011 4,377.60 374201 8/1512013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 53.70 321672 00010554 44010.1705 01398.1705.21 9234.6103 9234.6103 1554.6107 5760.6136 1642.6103 5862.6575 5822.6575 5842.6575 5761.6620 5760.6136 5761.6511 5761.6530 1647.6103 5421.5514 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSULTING INSPECTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page- 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PW FACILITY FUEL CANOPY LAKE EDINA B GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING FIELD MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R56CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Council Check Register Page - 6 8115/2013 -8116/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,533.83 321673 00010560 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 94.40 321674 00010561 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 394.20 321675 334933 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,076.13 374202 811512013 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 215.00 321676 96434 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 190.00- 321677 96380 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 25.00 374203 811512013 129923 CAWLEY 34.51 NAME BADGES 321456 V174490 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 34.51 374204 811512013 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 1,491.09 STRIPPER, CURE & SEAL 00001483 321510 1323018 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 863.29 CURE & SEAL, SHOVELS, TROWEL 00001679 321511 1327870 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,354.38 374205 8115/2013 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 24.29 3922 W 49 1/2 ST 321631 9941026 -7/13 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 12.43 3924 W 49 1/2 ST 321632 9941021 -7/13 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 12.43 3928 W 49 1/2 ST 321633 9941020 -7/13 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 12.43 3930 W 49 1/2 ST 321634 9941012 -7/13 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 61.58 374206 8115/2013 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 191.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 321457 71100 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 191.00 374207 8/15/2013 123898 CENTURYLINK 114.76 952826 -7398 321371 7398 -7/13 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 90.92 952 941 -1019 321372 1019 -7113 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 606.52 612 E12 -6797 321798 6797 -8/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 606.52 612 E01 -0426 321799 0426 -8/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,418.72 374208 811512013 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 240.00 AIRWATCH LICENSES 321512 COM -0054 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 374209 8/1512013 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 374210 811512013 Amount Supplier/ Explanation 270.31 ASPHALT MIX 270.31 120433 COMCAST 6.80 8772 10 614 0373022 6.80 8772 10 614 0373022 6.80 8772 10 614 0023973 65.96 8772 10 614 0177449 90.90 8772 10 614 0164959 110.61 8772 10 614 0396908 287.87 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 321513 071213 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 321373 373022 -6/13 321374 373022 -7/13 321375 23973 -7/13 321514 177449 -7/13 321515 164959 -7/13 321741 396908 -7/13 374211 8115/2013 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5420.6406 628.35 ASPHALT TELEPHONE 321516 071513 5913.6518 1,045.04 ASPHALT BLACKTOP 321516 071513 5913.6518 16,042.29 ASPHALT BLACKTOP 321516 071513 1,048.94 ASPHALT 321517 073113 2,747.23 ASPHALT 321517 073113 45,271.56 ASPHALT 321517 073113 66,783.41 374212 8115/2013 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 352.07 PAILS, SPRAYER 00001409 321458 0096402 -IN 86.79 REBAR, SAFETY VESTS 00001457 321459 0097165 -IN 389.78 SAFETY VESTS, CRACK SEALER 00001516 321518 0097680 -IN 828.64 374213 811612013 130818 COUNTINGCARS.COM 1,666.18 COUNTCAM 40 00004027 321635 565 1,666.18 374214 8115/2013 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,013.45 WATER BOTTLES 321376 21764 1,686.50 UNIFORMS 321377 21995 2,686.12 BEACH TOWELS 321378 22086 77.18 HAND STAMPS 321379 22170 5,463.25 374215 8115/2013 131636 CROCS INC. 77.04 SHOES 321592 2145387RI 77.04 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 7 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION BRIDGES GUARD RAILS ENGINEERING GENERAL POOL ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION POOL ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Council Check Register Page - 8 8/15/2013 - 8115/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 374216 811512013 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 238.94 114 - 10014090 -3 321636 073113 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 238.94 374217 811512013 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 4,534.12 FIRE PROTECTION GENERATOR 321519 39369 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 4,534.12 374218 8/1512013 104020 DALCO 206.35 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 00001669 321380 2632494 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 183.72 WINDEX, ALL PURPOSE CLEANER 00005434 321381 2632462 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 611.87 TAMPON VENDING MACHINE 00001454 321382 2633732 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 41.26 WINDEX 321520 2635471 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 1,043.20 374219 811512013 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE 820.80 DIRT 00008022 321816 1362,1437 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 820.80 374220 811512013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 48.00 321678 713074 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,154.65 321679 713075 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,202.65 374221 811512013 118063 DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL _ 9,250.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEANUP 321742 13 -03 -02 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 5,295.09 SUPPLIED GUM RUBBER COVERS 321743 13 -03-03 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 14,545.09 374222 8/15/2013 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 250.61 HITCH STEP BAR 00005377 321521 4- 143692 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 250.61 374223 8115/2013 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 346.23 PLIERS, IMPACT WRENCH 00005468 321383 819136 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.81- RETURN 321384 819160 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 326.42 374224 811512013 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 61.07 BAKERY 321522 467470 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 55.83 321523 467608 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 66.57 321524 467741 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2013 8:36:37 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 8/15/2013 -- 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 81.82 321525 467993 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 96.28 321526 467486 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 41.66 321527 468217 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 403.23 374225 8115/2013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 1,583.76 110311893 321529 110311893 -7/13 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,583.76 374226 8115/2013 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 663.64 TRAFFIC PAINT 00001203 321460 802145995 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 118.56 TRAFFIC PAINT 00001435 321461 802146226 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 793.01 WHITE DURABLE PAINT 00001447 321462 802146288 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 4,286.33 WHITE / YELLOW DURABLE 00001435 321463 802146243 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 79.62 BLACK TRAFFIC PAINT 321464 802146354 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 869.86 TRAFFIC PAINT 00001513 321465 802146552 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 793.01 WHITE DURABLE PAINT 00001559 321466 802146786 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 793.01 WHITE DURABLE PAINT 00001657 321467 802147065 .1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2,568.74 WHITE / YELLOW DURABLE 00001657 321468 802147066 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 54.65 REPACK KIT 321528 802146381 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 11,020.43 374227 811512013 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 1,823.82 BRAEMAR SURVEY MAILING 321530 5798 -01 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,823.82 374228 811512013 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONST 11,571.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321827 APPL 1 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 11,571.00 374229 8/15/2013 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONST 20,781.25 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321828 APPL 2 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 20,781.25 374230 8/1512013 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONST 27,445.50 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321833 #1 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 27,445.50 374231 811512013 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 144.00 CARAMEL CORN 321385 1642 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 144.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON OCCUPANCY ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY CITY OF EDINA YORK OCCUPANCY ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE Council Check Register 8/1512013 —811512013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No In0 No Account No 374232 811512013 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 1,325.25 TRAFFIC CONES 321531 0102556 -IN 1314.6406 1,325.25 374233 8115/2013 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 43.24 SKORT 321593 501532 5440.5511 43.24 374234 8115/2013 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 136.78 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001641 321386 10109400 5511.6406 318.38 WIRE, COUPLINGS, CONNECTORS 00001624 321387 10102400 5511.6406 455.16 374235 811512013 113116 EDINA CHEERLEADING 2,400.00 CHEERLEADING CAMP 321637 080813 1600.4390.25 2,400.00 374236 8/15/2013 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 406.00 BUS FOR PLAYGROUND PROGRAMS 321638 130 -056 1624.6406 406.00 374237 8115/2013 103594 EDINALARM INC. 359.10 MONITORING SERVICE - 6 MO 321388 82047 5861.6250 609.19 MONITORING SERVICE - 6 MO 321388 82047 5821.6250 654.07 MONITORING SERVICE - 6 MO 321388 82047 5841.6250 335.05 ALARM MONITORING 321532 82112 5420.6250 335.05 ALARM MONITORING 321594 82102 5420.6250 2,292.46 374238 811512013 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 72.60 321680 983 5862.5515 72.60 374239 8/1512013 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 2,376.33 PUMP REPAIR 00001593 321595 0050532 -IN 5921.6180 2,376.33 374240 811512013 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 1,179.09 E -81 REPAIRS 321639 69468 1470.6180 1,179.09 374241 8/15/2013 130846 ETHICAL LEADERS IN ACTION LLC Subledger Account Description GENERALSUPPLIES 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 10 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CHEERLEEDING CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND 8. THEATER ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 11 Business Unit INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 300.00 BLDG DEPT MEETING 321640 1159 1495.6103 650.00 PARAMEDIC MEETING 321640 1159 1470.6103 950.00 374242 8/1512013 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,084.00 JULY BILLINGS 321800 080713 1470.6103 6,084.00 374243 8/1512013 100158 EXPLORE MINNESOTA GOLF ALLIANC 450.00 GOLF TIME EMGA COOP AD 321533 BRAEMAR GC 5410.6122 450.00 374244 8/15/2013 116872 EXTRACTOR CORPORATION 662.00 SWIMSUIT WATER EXTRACTOR 00001551 321389 13 -1470 5311.6406 662.00 374245 8/15/2013 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 536.00 321681 W- 800669 5822.5515 536.00 374246 811512013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 267.79 AUTO PARTS 321390 1- 4231913 1553.6530 40.42 STRAP SETS 321391 1- 4236210 1553.6530 53.91 SWITCH 321534 69- 108296 1553.6530 362.12 374247 811512013 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 800.00 JR GOLF LEAGE INSTRUCTION 321596 080513 5410.6132 800.00 374248 8/15/2013 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 289.65 SAFETY CAMP GROUP PHOTOS 321469 T2- 327107 -83260 1624.6406 63 289.65 374249 8115/2013 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 27.17 HARDWARE 00001557 321392 MNTC2118644 1646.6530 27.17 374250 8/15/2013 130136 FADS, SUSAN 118.09 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321597 080613 1600.6107 118.09 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 11 Business Unit INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Council Check Register Page - 12 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 374251 8115/2013 100051 FBI -NAA NORTHWEST CHAPTER 80.00 SHOOTING COURSE REGISTRATION 321810 081213 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 374252 8/1512013 132565 FENSKE, HEATHER 54.00 PARK & REC PROGRAM REFUND 321641 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 54.00 374253 8/1512013 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 321470 2460455 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 374254 811512013 101475 FOOTJOY 142.75 JACKET 321598 5102655 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 142.75 374255 8115/2013 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 98.20 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 321744 080913 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 98.20 374256 811512013 104980 FRONTIER PRECISION INC. 550.00 TRIMBLE TRAINING 00001734 321745 117456 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 550.00 374257 811512013 100764 G & K SERVICES 21.88 321599 073113 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 77.77 321599 073113 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.45 321599 073113 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 98.46 321599 073113 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 152.42 321599 073113 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 223.10 321599 073113 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 285.41 321599 073113 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 955.49 374258 811512013 132556 GARRY, TERESA 40.00 SAFETY CAMP REFUND 321600 REFUND 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 40.00 374259 8/1512013 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY • MINNFA 134.60 AUTO PARTS 321601 073113 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 289.07 AUTO PARTS 321601 073113 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 - 8115/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5420.6230 5919.6104 5200.1727 1643.6406 5422.6406 5842.5513 5521.6406 5410.6132 5761.6406 5913.6543 5765.6540 5761.6540 47084.6710 1643.6543 5511.6406 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 13 Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF DOME GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAINING GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GENERAL TURF CARE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES SOD & BLACK DIRT FERTILIZER FERTILIZER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING DISTRIBUTION PROMENADE EXPENSES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING LAKE EDINA PK PATHWAY GENERAL TURF CARE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 423.67 374260 811512013 124541 GEYEN GROUP 400.78 CARPET CLEANING 00006215 321535 22955 400.78 374261 8/15/2013 102540 GOERGEN, DAVID 21.47 TRAINING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321817 NEPTUNE 21.47 374262 811512013 132593 GORMAN SURVEYING INC. 462.50 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321838 8089E 462.50 374263 811512013 101103 GRAINGER 116.95 FLOAT SWITCH, ELBOWS 00001658 321393 9198604663 297.06 GLOVES, TAPE 00006220 321536 9199976599 414.01 374264 811512013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,913.25 321682 155399 2,913.25 374265 8/15/2013 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 115.48 SUB PANEL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 321394 967505159 115.48 374266 811512013 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 1,200.00 JR LEAGUE GOLF INSTRUCTION 321602 080513 1,200.00 374267 811512013 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 47.03 DIRT, SOD, MULCH 321818 073113 580.86 DIRT, SOD, MULCH 321818 073113 666.90 DIRT, SOD, MULCH 321818 073113 889.18 DIRT, SOD, MULCH 321818 073113 1,000.35 DIRT, SOD, MULCH 321818 073113 1,431.39 DIRT, SOD, MULCH 321818 073113 1,938.76 DIRT, SOD, MULCH 321818 073113 6,554.47 374268 8115/2013 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 5420.6230 5919.6104 5200.1727 1643.6406 5422.6406 5842.5513 5521.6406 5410.6132 5761.6406 5913.6543 5765.6540 5761.6540 47084.6710 1643.6543 5511.6406 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 13 Business Unit SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF DOME GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAINING GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GENERAL TURF CARE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES SOD & BLACK DIRT FERTILIZER FERTILIZER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING DISTRIBUTION PROMENADE EXPENSES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING LAKE EDINA PK PATHWAY GENERAL TURF CARE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 - 8/1512013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 33.35 FOUNTAIN PARTS 00001664 321395 112320 -1 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8/1412013 8:36:37 Page - 14 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EQUIPMENT RENTAL STREET RENOVATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE STREET RENOVATION GRILL GRILL ASSESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 33.35 CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL SUPPLIES 374269 8/1512013 129929 HANLY, DUSTIN 21.47 REIMBURSE TRAINING MILEAGE 321746 NEPTUNE 5919.6104 21.47 374270 8/1512013 132566 HARVEY, WENDY 35.00 PARK & REC PROGRAM REFUND 321642 REFUND 1600.4390.06 35.00 374271 811512013 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,544.66 CHEMICALS 321396 3495054 5311.6545 3,399.41 CHEMICALS 00001250 321397 3497990 5915.6586 4,944.07 374272 811512013 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC. 244.69 STAIN REMOVER, TAR REMOVER 321398 321067 1314.6406 3,379.01 STONE FOR COMM GARDEN WALL 00001699 321537 320829 1647.6103 184.95 PAINTITAR REMOVER, TECHNISEAL 321801 321411 1314.6406 3,808.65 374273 8/1512013 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 321538 024681 5421.5510 153.12 321539 024694 5421.5510 306.24 374274 811512013 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 321471 1000032988 1190.6105 1,272.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE 321604 130638014 1470.6151 1,432.31 374275 811512013 132558 HERBERT, AMY 68.00 CLASS REFUND 321603 080513 5101.4607 68.00 374276 811512013 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 40.61 DISPLAY SPEAKERS 00003198 321540 53086352 1554.6710 167.79 PC DISPLAY 00003198 321541 53087519 1554.6710 34.20 SPEAKER BARS 00004345 321542 53146275 1552.6406 242.60 8/1412013 8:36:37 Page - 14 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EQUIPMENT RENTAL STREET RENOVATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE STREET RENOVATION GRILL GRILL ASSESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 8/14/2011 8:36:37 Page - 15 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS A -249 LAKE EDINA RECON LANDSCP 1 74245 321683 660545 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,742.45 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 374280 8/15/2013 101632 HOLIDAY Council Check Register 63.00 1400 - 003 -772 -977 321643 8/15/2013 —8/1512013 1470.6107 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374277 8115/2013 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 8/1512013 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 25.32 HOSE VACUUM ASSEMBLY 00002184 321399 600786221 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1.47 ELBOW INSERTS 25.32 071213 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 374278 811512013 7.93 128215 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA 321606 071213 01395.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 8,320.00 LANDSCAPING - LAKE EDINA 00002525 321605 6963 01249.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 321606 071213 8,320.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 374279 811512013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 8/14/2011 8:36:37 Page - 15 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS A -249 LAKE EDINA RECON LANDSCP 1 74245 321683 660545 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD BRAEMAR HILLS B STREET RENOVATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 1,742.45 374280 8/15/2013 101632 HOLIDAY 63.00 1400 - 003 -772 -977 321643 FUEL 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 63.00 374281 8/1512013 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1.47 ELBOW INSERTS 321606 071213 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.93 SCREWS 321606 071213 01395.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 114.22 LUMBER, SPRINKLER HEADS 321606 071213 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 123.62 374282 811512013 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 555.50 POOL CHEMICALS 00002129 321400 13042920 5720.6545 CHEMICALS 1,107.52- CREDIT 321401 RMA -829 5720.6545 CHEMICALS 446.59 POOL CHEMICALS 00002152 321402 13052814 5720.6545 CHEMICALS 740.03 POOL CHEMICALS 00002183 321403 13072237 5720.6545 CHEMICALS 634.60 374283 811512013 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 1,566.00 OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIRS 321644' D259527 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,566.00 374284 811512013 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 161.38 POSTER REPRINTS 321472 94990 1130.6575 PRINTING 161.38 374285 8115/2013 132592 J.F.AHERNCO. 4,681.60 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321835 350263 -01 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 4,681.60 374286 8115/2013 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD BRAEMAR HILLS B STREET RENOVATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Council Check Register Page - 16 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 30,627.62 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321836 350263 -02 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 30,627.62 374287 811512013 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 5,225.00 ABILITY TO CREATE AN ACCOUNT 321473 JJ5239 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 5,225.00 374288 811612013 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 52.56 TOILET SERVICE 321404 66464 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 9.39 TOILET SERVICE 321474 65950 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 61.95 374289 8/1512013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 649.60 321684 2117870 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 39.05 321685 2108952 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 300.00 321686 2108956 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 988.65 374290 8/1512013 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 29.17 PIPE FITTINGS 00006456 321405 65498773 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 152.47 FOAM MARKERS 00006226 321406 65495562 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 225.96 TANK CLEANER 00006465 321543 65583683 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 407.60 374292 8/1512013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 178.24 321687 1639484 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,327.25 321686 1639510 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,317.26 321689 1639492 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.99 321690 1639493 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 618.83 321691 1639491 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 121.12 321692 1639509 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 798.74 321693 1639494 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,251.22 321694 1639508 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,532.95 321695 1639511 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 899.55 321696 1634621 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,595.08 321777 1639498 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 321778 1639486 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,212.32 321779 1639501 - 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,889.84 321780 1639503 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 301.60 321781 1639499 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.12 321782 1639504 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,313.25 321783 1639507 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5110.6564 5111.6406 5110.6513 5125.6513 5120.6406 5110.6406 5110.6564 1551.6406 1553.6530 1553.6530 5921.6406 1500.6103 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/14/2011 8:36:37 Page - 17 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES DEPT UNIFORMS 24,942.49 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 FIRE DEPT. 374293 8/1512013 DEPT UNIFORMS 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE Council Check Register DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. 8/15/2013 - 8115/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,886.82 321784 1639500 5842.5513 20.99 321785 1639506 5842.5513 1,860.62 321786 1639502 5842.5513 1761.58 321787 1639505 5842.5513 5110.6564 5111.6406 5110.6513 5125.6513 5120.6406 5110.6406 5110.6564 1551.6406 1553.6530 1553.6530 5921.6406 1500.6103 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/14/2011 8:36:37 Page - 17 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES DEPT UNIFORMS 24,942.49 GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. 374293 8/1512013 DEPT UNIFORMS 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. 26.96 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 321747 080913 26.96 374294 811512013 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 14.85 PETTY CASH 321544 080713 15.81 PETTY CASH 321544 080713 17.16 PETTY CASH 321544 080713 25.00 PETTY CASH 321544 080713 38.52 PETTY CASH 321544 080713 177.91 PETTY CASH 321544 080713 289.25 374295 811512013 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 449.61 REFRIGERANT 00001694 321407 007756 449.61 374296 811512013 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 155.50 BEARINGS 00005405 321545 0983701 165.87 BEARINGS 00005405 321546 J638333 195.11 STRAPS 00001592 321607 P210817 516.48 374297 8115/2013 131439 KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL LLP 19,481.00 FLIGHT TRACK CHANGES 321475 14418 19,481.00 374298 811512013 111018 KEEPRS INC. 1,822.22 UNIFORM PATCHES 00003631 321645 218401 173.36 UNIFORMS 00003649 321646 221778 -01 356.94 UNIFORMS 00003648 321647 221704 -01 122.37 UNIFORMS 00003647 321648 221364 -02 434.97 UNIFORMS 00003628 321649 221175 -01 2,909.86 374299 8115/2013 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 5110.6564 5111.6406 5110.6513 5125.6513 5120.6406 5110.6406 5110.6564 1551.6406 1553.6530 1553.6530 5921.6406 1500.6103 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/14/2011 8:36:37 Page - 17 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Council Check Register Page - 18 8/1512013 -8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 593.75 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321834 1306600001 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 593.75 374300 8/15/2013 126953 KIMM, RYAN 150.00 FARMERS MARKET 8122/13 321579 080113 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 374301 8/15/2013 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 289.00 FAUCET REPAIR - 6994 TUPPA 321476 2151 05531.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BRAEMAR HILLS B RECON 294.00 REMOVE SEDIMENT -4708 TRILLIUM 321477 2165 05533.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINAA RECON 312.50 4708 AND 4801 TRILLUM 321478 2168 05533.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINA A RECON 895.50 374302 811512013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 453.80 DRILL BITS 00005437 321547 9301779102 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 453.80 374303 811512013 121152 LEA, STEVE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/19/13 321581 080113 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 374304 811512013 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 646.75 SAND 321548 213762 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 646.75 374305 8/1512013 132579 LIBERTY ENVELOPE 101.53 SENIOR CENTER ENVELOPES 321748 81397 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 260.78 7450 METRO ENVELOPES 321749 81398 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 181.69 PUBLIC HEARING ENVELOPES 321750 81399 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 405.06 ENVELOPES 321751 81400 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 949.06 374306 8115/2013 132575 LINSTROM, LINDA 100.00 AMBULANCE REFUND 321752 080813 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 374307 811512013 120856 LLOYD'S CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 33,449.50 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321826 0212497 -IN 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 33,449.50 374308 8/1512013 101843 LONG, JEFF 424.73 FBINAA CONFERENCE EXPENSES 321479 2013 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8/1412013 8:36:37 Page - 19 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENA ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRIPS PROF SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 3,075.46 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 374310 811512013 101361 M.I.A.M.A. Council Check Register 900.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 00008031 8/15/2013 — 8/15/2013 2405 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 424.73 374311 8/1512013 374309 8115/2013 101792 LUBE -TECH 1,065.65 GAS 00006136 321549 2243507 5422.6581 GASOLINE 1,442.07 DIESEL 00006137 321550 2243506 5422.6581 GASOLINE 56774 GAS 00006136 321551 2243508 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/1412013 8:36:37 Page - 19 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENA ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRIPS PROF SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 3,075.46 374310 811512013 101361 M.I.A.M.A. 900.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 00008031 321416 2405 5510.6104 900.00 374311 8/1512013 131581 MARCO INC. 9,171.45 SEMI ANNUAL PRINTER CONTRACT 321552 INV1520178 1554.6230 9,171.45 374312 8115/2013 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 450.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATION 321553 8585 1550.6121 450.00 374313 8115/2013 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 105.00 INTERCOM REPAIRS 321554 481732 1470.6180 105.00 374314 811512013 131867 MAXX SUNGLASSES 422.06 SUNGLASSES 321608 139374 5440.5511 422.06 374315 8/15/2013 125941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 5,081.00 REPLACE FAILED COMPRESSOR 321408 2600443 5720.6180 3,013.00 REPLACE AIR SUPPLY FAN 00002176 321409 2600564 5720.6180 8,094.00 374316 811512013 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,839.00 AUG ISTRIP 321650 080713 1628.6103.07 1,839.00 374317 8115/2013 101327 MEDICINE SHOW BAND, THE 600.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8118/13 321580 080113 5760.6136 600.00 374318 8/1512013 101483 MENARDS 8/1412013 8:36:37 Page - 19 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENA ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRIPS PROF SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS SENIOR CITIZENS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA. 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Council Check Register Page - 20 8115/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7.18 COUPLERS 321410 31260 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 31.97 LIGHT BULBS 00001645 321411 31456 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 67.64 DOLLY; GLOVES, TAPE 00008029 321412 32163 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 143.06 NOZZLES, HOSES 00001760 321413 32928 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 43.26 WIRE MESH 00006455 321414 31868 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 51.64 MARKING PAINT, CORD 00001464 321555 28960 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 24.92 LUMBER 00001465 321556 28938 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 79.40 WRENCH SET, BITS, KNIFE 00001713 321609 32831 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 449.07 374319 811512013 100885 METRO SALES INC 357.58 PRINTER MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 321557 541418 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY 357.58 374320 8115/2013 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 353,559.94 SEWER SERVICE 321415 0001023478 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 353,559.94 374321 8/15/2013 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 416.29 STEP ASSEMBLY, COVER 00005470 321558 485469 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 416.29 374322 8/1512013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,940.00 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001732 321753 34500 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,940.00 374323 811512013 120051 MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE 80.00 FIRE CHIEF DIRECTORY 321754 60298 7410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PSTF ADMINISTRATION 80.00 374324 811512013 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 618.83 EMULSION 321559 69428 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 618.83 374325 8/15/2013 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 123.52 SPRAY GUN 00001678 321417 0100711 -IN 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 64.29 TRIGGER VALVE 00001684 321418 0100768 -IN 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 32.01 HYDRANT ADAPTER 00005472 321610 0100893 -IN 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 219.82 374326 811512013 102169 MOONLIGHT SERENADERS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/21/13 321584 080113 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8115/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page- 21 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 5422.6530 150.00 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5422.6611 374327 8/1512013 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 105729 MOWER COUNTY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 115.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 321788 081213 5761.6406 115.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5761.6530 374328 811512013 CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 121243 MRCC REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,495.00 INTERCITY LEADERSHIP VISIT 321480 2013 2,495.00 374329 8115/2013 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 847.17 ROLLER MOUNTS, FILTERS 00006461 321560 918941 -00 440.00 BOARD REPAIR 321561 918985 -00 685.18 CONVERSION ASSEMBLIES 00006463 321562 919323 -00 89.47 SCREWS 00006466 321563 919982 -00 77.58 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002007 321755 920906 -00 16.54 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002008 321756 921310 -00 77.64 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002008 321757 921437 -00 2,233.58 374330 8115/2013 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 9,500.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321831 APPL 1 9,500.00 374331 8115/2013 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 4,750.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321837 APPL (1) 4,750.00 374332 8/15/2013 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 705.64 REPAIR COMPRESSOR - ARROWHEAD 321481 1840 705.64 374333 811512013 103007 NELSON, DAVID 414.37 FBINAA CONFERENCE EXPENSES 321482 2013 414.37 374334 8115/2013 100922 NEWMAN SIGNS 1,029.43 SIGN LETTERS 00001549 321483 TI- 0263944 1,046.21 SIGN LETTERS, BRACKETS 321484 TI- 0264358 475.18 CLOSED TO THRU TRAFFIC SIGNS 00001642 321485 TI- 0264315 2,550.82 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page- 21 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRO 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374335 811512013 102551 NFPA 3,146.85 NATL FIRE CODES SUBSCRIPTION 321651 080713 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,146.85 374336 8115/2013 104350 NIKE USA INC. 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 22 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,456.15 40.38 SHORTS 321611 951928955 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 382.57 RAIN SUITS 321612 951928954 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 988.69 MERCHANDISE 321613 952051333 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,411.64 374337 8115/2013 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 AUG 2013 SERVICES 321614 3520 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 658.75 374338 8115/2013 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 120.23 ZIPLINE WIRE 00001676 321419 521942 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 120.23 374339 8/1512013 119486 PARAGON BLACK DIRT 846.45 BLACK DIRT 321819 4754 47084.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT LAKE EDINA PK PATHWAY 846.45 374340 8/1512013 132577 PATRICK, CORY 113.25 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 321758 4833 WESTBROOK 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LA 113.25 374341 8/15/2013 100347 PAUSTIS S SONS 994.70 321697 8410623 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 203.20 321698 8410631 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,152.98 321699 8410633 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,350.88 374342 811512013 124366 PEARSON, JACK 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/22/13 321585 080113 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 374343 8115/2013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 836.65 321759 10553852 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 619.50 321760 10553904 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,456.15 R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/15/2013 - 8115/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 374344 8/15/2013 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC 250.00 GRAPHIC DESIGN - LOGOS 321486 080213 -8 1130.6103 175.00 GRAPHIC DESIGN - POSTCARD 321487 080213 -9 1130.6103 550.00 GOLF COURSE BROCHURE DESIGN 321802 081313 -1 1130.6103 325.00 TABLETOP TREASURE MAP DESIGN 321803 081313 1130.6103 1,300.00 374346 811512013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 27.17 321700 2443038 5822.5512 214.03 321701 2466421 5862.5513 155.36 321702 2466414 5862.5513 2,467.24 321703 2466423 5862.5513 1,008.93 321704 2466422 5862.5512 57.12- 321705 3509340 5862.5513 1,446.11 321789 2466419 5642.5512 749.27 321790 2466420 5842.5513 1,627.56 321791 2466418 5842.5513 572.65 321792 2466413 5842.5513 8,211.20 374346 8115/2013 100953 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 19.80 AED SIGN FOR AQUATIC CTR 00002135 321564 114022440 5311.6406 4,104.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 00003644 321565 414009740 1470.6215 4,123.80 374347 811612013 104235 PLATENBERG, KATHY 125.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/20/13 321582 080113 5760.6136 125.00 374348 811512013 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 325.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 321820 081213 1628.6235 325.00 374349 8/1512013 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 4,365.86 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY POSTAGE 321821 081313 1627.6406 4,365.86 374350 811512013 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 68.93 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321761 TRAINING 5919.6104 68.93 374351 8/15/2013 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 23 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 — 8115/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,234.96 PLATES, CUTLERY SETS 00002185 321420 6280 5720.5510 321.14 TISSUE, TOWELS, URINAL SCREENS0008021 321421 6233 5511.6511 614.19 GLOVES, TISSUE, LINERS 00008030 321422 6285 5511.6511 449.25 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 00008035 321423 6265 5511.6511 111.29 TERRY TOWELS 00002182 321424 6274 5720.6511 627.88 CAN LINERS, GLOVES, TOWELS 00002182 321425 6278 5720.6511 3,358.71 374352 811512013 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 450.80 FOUNTAIN REPAIR 00002010 321762 15937 5761.6180 450.80 374353 811512013 125321 REACH WITH ME 1,225.00 FACILITATION OF KID N' PLAY 321652 8114 1600.4390.52 1,225.00 374354 8115/2013 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 736.95 REPLACED TOILET 321426 61886 5422.6180 736.95 374355 8115/2013 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 4,738.79 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 321615 081613 44010.1705.30 4,738.79 374356 8/15/2013 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 106,420.21 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321839 1305018701 5200.1727 106,420.21 374357 8/15/2013 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 22,810.41 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321840 201305018702 5200.1727 22,810.41 374358 8/1512013 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 633.80 SOFTENER SALT 321427 00287413 5511.6406 94.91 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 321653 00287291 1470.6406 728.71 374359 8115/2013 129492 ROCHESTER CONCRETE PRODUCTS LL 80.58 PAVERS 00002013 321763 122994 5761.6530 80.58 374360 811512013 129857 ROCKMAN LANDSCAPING & TREE SER Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 24 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW FACILITY FUEL CANOPY GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT, GENERAL REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2013 8:36:37 R55CKREG LOG20000 -Council Check Register Page - 25 8/15/2013 — 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO It Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,179.20 TREE REMOVAL 00001770 321822 3316 W 56TH 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,179.20 374361 8/1512013 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 CHANGE OUT PARTS WASHER 321566 929699333 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.07 374362 8115/2013 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 321654 INV- 11404 -2013 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 374363 8/1512013 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 40.10 LUMBER 00001651 321567 41131364 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 40.10 374364 811512013 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 788.58 QUARTERLY BILLING 321655 8103527477 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 788.58 374365 8/15/2013 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 200.00 K9 BOARDING FEES 321811 081213 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 200.00 374366 811512013 132555 SF CABLE INC. 21.14 CABLE FOR SQUAD GPS 321616 661503 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.14 374367 8/1512013 103219 SGN WENDEL 1,173.00 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 321568 3678 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH 1,173.00 374368 811512013 132567 SHANE, SHEILA 83.00 CLASS REFUND 321656 080513 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 83.00 374369 811512013 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 122.67 PAINT 00001683 321488 3352 -5 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 122.67 374370 8/1512013 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 145.96 PAINT 00001453 321489 2070 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 145.96 R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 374371 8/15/2013 131543 SIGNCRAFTERS 1,265.08 FLAGPOLE REPAIR 00002009 321764 50765 5761.6180 1,265.08 374372 811512013 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTER 336.66 CARPET CLEANING 321428 1013C 5821.6162 224.44 321429 1014C 5861.6162 224.44 321430 1015C 5841.6162 785.54 374373 8/1512013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,410.50 321706 1061822 5862.5513 6,219.50 321707 1061823 5862.5513 1,624.25 321708 1061820 5842.5512 4,841.00 321709 1061818 5842.5513 264.50 321710 1061819 5842.5513 1,880.50 321711 1061821 5842.5513 84.50 321712 1061817 5822.5513 627.50 321713 1061814 5822.5513 2,454.10 321714 1061824 5862.5512 198.50 321715 1059834 5862.5512 25.41 321716 1057390 5842.5512 96.00- 321717 0003869 5822.5513 19,534.26 374374 8115/2013 130021 SPRING LAKE PARK FIRE DEPT. IN 75.00 BLUE CARD TRAINING 321569 BC- 0096 -1 1470.6104 75.00 374375 8115/2013 118682 SPRINT 30.00 GPS TRACKING INVESTIGATION 321657 LCI- 178908 1400.6406 30.00 374376 8/1512013 108680 ST. PAUL UTILITIES INC. 27,550.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 321832 4811 5200.1727 27,550.00 374377 8/15/2013 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 32.45 PANEL 00005382 321570 492858 1553.6530 64.65 VEHICLE REPAIRS 321571 633477 1553.6180 97.10 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS SERVICES CUSTODIANS SERVICES CUSTODIANS SERVICES CUSTODIANS 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 26 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 - CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 — 8115/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374378 8/15/2013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 51 96 PUBLISH NOTICE 321431 1453141 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL DATA PROCESSING 8/14/2, _ _ 8:36:37 Page - 27 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONCRETE CONCRETE CUSTOMER REFUND GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL CLASS REGISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 51.96 374379 8/15/2013 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 1,355.96 PROPERTY ROOM SCANNER 321432 68487 1400.6160 1,355.96 374380 8/1512013 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 375.47 8101113 MOVIE 321433 DB1829947 5760.6136 402.28 8/08/13 MOVIE 321617 OB1833620 5760.6136 777.75 374381 8/15/2013 132560 SWENCRAFT 2,800.00 REMOVE/1NSTALL COUNTERTOPS 321618 HALF DUE 1180.6103 2,800.00 374382 8/1512013 104932 TAYLOR MADE 842.46 MERCHANDISE 321619 21004279 5440.5511 39.26 SKORT 321620 21070253 5440.5511 881.72 374383 8/1512013 120325 TCC MATERIALS 332.63 MORTAR 00001705 321658 0000621635 5932.6520 12.00- PALLET RETURN 321659 0000622269 5932.6520 320.63 374384 8/15/2013 132578 THATCHER, MARY _ 73.70 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 321765 5309 HALIFAX 5900.2015 73.70 374385 8115/2013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 261.00 321793 767613 5421.5514 261.00 374386 8/1512013 132557 THYNE, KATIE 83.00 CLASS REFUND 321621 080513 5101.4607 83.00 374387 8115/2013 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 600.00 BRAEMAR GOLF /DOME AD 321572 2013 - 105125 5410.6122 DATA PROCESSING 8/14/2, _ _ 8:36:37 Page - 27 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONCRETE CONCRETE CUSTOMER REFUND GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL CLASS REGISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 4,356.78 CITY OF EDINA 321622 1894043 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register 4,356.78 8/15/2013 —8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 600.00 374388 8/15/2013 321437 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 396.55 COUNCIL MINUTES 7/16/13 321434 M19942 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 192.90 PARK BOARD MEETING MINUTES 321573 M19941 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120595 T- MOBILE 589.45 374389 8/1512013 103277 TITAN MACHINERY SURVEY PHONE 477067848 321490 072713 1260.6188 1,227.22 PEDAL ASSEMBLY, CUTTING EDGESl0005406 321435 1622863 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 32.63 39.05 PLOW BOLTS 00005447 321436 1669563 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 374393 1,266.27 101293 TODD, DARRELL 374390 8/1512013 101474 TITLEIST 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 28 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,356.78 GOLF BALLS 321622 1894043 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,356.78 374391 8/15/2013 131040 TLO LLC 110.25 JULY 2013 USAGE 321437 269634 -8/13 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 110.25 374392 811512013 120595 T- MOBILE 32.63 SURVEY PHONE 477067848 321490 072713 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 32.63 374393 811512013 101293 TODD, DARRELL 108.29 REPLACEMENT AIR PUMP 321660 080713 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 108.29 374394 811612013 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 31.53 WELDING TANKS 321766 464926 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 31.53' 374395 811512013 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 230.35 GRINDING WHEELS 00001659 321438 S134719 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING 230.35 374396 811512013 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 313.09 DOOR CLOSER 00001436 321823 583206 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 313.09 374397 811512013 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 75.45 MULCH 321439 30537 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW 8 ICE REMOVAL CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2 . - 8:36:37 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 8/15/2013 - 8115/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 154.97 RYEGRASS SEED 321440 30530 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 577.13 ATHLETIC TURF MIXTURE 00001662 321441 30557 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 577.13 ATHLETIC TURF MIXTURE 00001680 321442 30573 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 577.13 ATHLETIC TURF MIXTURE 00001686 321443 30595 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 865.69 ATHLETIC TURF MIXTURE 00001696 321444 30608 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 384.75 TURF MIXTURE 00006222 321574 30604 5424.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT RANGE 1,125.39 EROSION BLANKETS, SEED 321824 30517 47084.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT LAKE EDINA PK PATHWAY 577.23 EROSION BLANKETS, SEED 321825 30491 47084.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT LAKE EDINA PK PATHWAY 4,914.87 374398 8/15/2013 125032 UNI- SELECT USA 513.19 AUTO PARTS 321767 073113 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 513.19 374399 8/1512013 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 12.23 SHIP WATER SAMPLES 321623 TRAN:5564 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 12.23 4 374400 811512013 101908 US FOODS 346.51 DEGREASER, CLEANERS 321575 43805514 -7/13 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 765.42 FOIL, TRAYS, GLASSES 321575 43805514 -7/13 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 8,422.04 FOOD 321575 43805514 -7113 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 9,533.97 374401 811512013 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 1,233.00 EXCAVATE FOR REPAIR 00001730 321661 19017 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,233.00 374402 811512013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 102.11 TOWELS 321576 281566 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 102.11 374403 8115/2013 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 802.65 CLUTCH, BELTS 00006462 321577 69156 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 300.49 STEERING BOX ASSEMBLY 00002006 321768 69165 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,103.14 374404 8115/2013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 14.77 CONDUIT 00001706 321624 7512301 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 132.11 WIRE, CHARGER 00001706 321624 7512301 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.05 CONDUIT 00001688 321625 7502270 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 113.50 FUSES 00001688 321625 7502270 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 221.08 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 00001688 321625 7502270 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 30 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 494.51 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 374405 8/15/2013 YORK SELLING 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION VERNON SELLING 547.11 CONCESSION PRODUCT 321445 37199705 5520.5510 547.11 374406 8/1512013 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 542.00 LEAK LOCATES 00001731 321662 4190 5913.6103 542.00 374407 8115/2013 102020 WELLS, GARY 21.47 TRAINING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 321769 NEPTUNE 5919.6104 21.47 374408 811512013 101501 WENZEL HEATING & AIR COND 66.80 PERMIT REFUND 321626 ED122635 1495.4115 66.80 374409 811512013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 937.20 321718 336926 -00 5842.5513 • 1,450.40 321719 336925 -00 5862.5513 2,387.60 374410 811512013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 637.60 321720 466378 5862.5513 4,193.23 321721 466375 5862.5513 700.96 321794 466374 5842.5513 2,761.36 321795 466377 5842.5513 8,293.15 374411 8/15/2013 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 606.70 INSECTICIDE 321446 58820109 5422.6545 606.70 374412 811512013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 566.79 321722 1080070277 5822.5512 1,490.53 321723 1080070276 5862.5513 10,320.92 321724 1080070279 5842.5512 88.09 321725 1080070281 5842.5515 3,902.41 321726 1080070280 5842.5513 3,138.65 321727 1080070275 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 30 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ONE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Council Check Register Page - 31 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No • Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,531.00- 321728 4080000583 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,027.00- 321728 4080000583 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 427.00- 321728 4080000583 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 264.03 321796 1080067854 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 16,786.42 374413 8115/2013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 458.00 321729 1090087944 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 206.40 321730 1090087328 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 392.00 321731 1090088966 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 43.00 321732 1090088967 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,769.50 321733 1090088965 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,897.40 321734 1090087879 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,766.30 374414 811512013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 502.00 XERXES AVE TRAFFIC COUNTS 321491 2- 01686 -420 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 4,777.00 FRANCE AVE PED CROSSINGS 321492 15- 01686 -300 01404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 1,224.00 TRACYAVE IMPROVEMENTS 321493 19- 01686 -250 01368,1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON 3,623.50 HAZELTON RD DESIGN 321663 1- 01686 -460 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,264.00 HAZELTON RD FEASABILITY STUDY 321664 3- 01686 -400 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 13,390.50 374415 811512013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 37.75 51- 7567037 -0 321447 377872426 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 33.46 51- 4151897 -6 321448 377825599 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 429.90 51- 9422326 -6 321449 377897368 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,346.67 51- 4966303 -6 321450 377838561 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 7,309.30 51- 0837548 -4 321494 377930746 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 22,916.73 51- 5605640 -1 321495 378175429 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 2,391.36 51- 5634814 -2 321496 377847805 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 1,534.64 51- 6979948 -4 321497 377866200 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 2,002.63 51- 6979948 -4 321497 377866200 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 2,471.92 51- 6979948 -4 321497 377866200 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 7,919.33 51- 9603061 -0 321498 377895484 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 950.22 51- 6137136 -8 321499 377854934 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 76.98 3926 W 49 1/2 ST 321665 377750028 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 5,126.15 51- 6840050 -6 321770 378354690 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 10,771.23 51- 6824328 -7 321805 378711196 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 51,028.56 51- 5605640 -1 321806 378582342 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 522.03 51- 5605640 -1 321807 378765609 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 14,343.16 51- 6121102 -5 321808 378698695 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/15/2013 — 8/15/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No \Subledger Account Description 132,212.02 374416 811512013 132553 YALE MECHANICAL 1,257.28 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 321451 141704 1,257.28 374417 8/15/2013 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 173.28 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 321771 54069964 173.28 374418 811512013 101091 ZIEGLER INC 2,825.81 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 321578 SW060056047 4,693.72 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 321666 E8644301 7,519.53 1,637,769.13 Grand Total 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,637,769.13 Total Payments 1,637,769.13 8/14/2013 8:36:37 Page - 32 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 8/15/2013 - 8/15/2013 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 241,039.35 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 25,402.39 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 21,967.20 05100 ART CENTER FUND 693.12 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 614,049.59 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 8,723.51 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 52,185.25 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 8,801.93 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 11,947.83 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 7,497.81 05800 LIQUOR FUND 117,092.91 05900 UTILITY FUND 455,497.37 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,417.63 05950 RECYCLING FUND 34,192.80 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 15,851.48 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 7,026.06 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 12,382.90 Report Totals 1,637,769.13 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll is d Procedures—date 8114/2013 8:39:12 Page - 1 To: City Council From: Karen M. Kurt, Assistant City Manager Date: August 5, 2013 vi v �y J 104 Agenda Item #: IV. C. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request For Purchase - Rebranding /Design Services /Interior Signage And Displays For Edina Liquor Stores Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Company: Hot Dish Advertising Recommended Quote or Bid: Hot Dish Advertising General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: Amount of Quote or Bid: $25,000 Staff met with six potential partners before recommending Hot Dish Advertising to assist with rebranding and design services for Edina Liquor. Through the work with Hot Dish Advertising, Edina Liquor will develop new, consistent brand messaging for implementation in stores. The work will cover brand development and design, advertising and signage templates, marketing and media plan, and promotional calendar. We anticipate that another $35,000 will be spent on interior signage, store end -cap displays, banners and other branding elements for an approximate total cost of $60,000. We will also be evaluating the potential for new exterior signage. Once implemented, our Communication and Technology Services department and liquor store staff will facilitate ongoing brand management. Signage for Edina Liquor stores is included in the CIP for 2013. This request for purchase follows extensive work done by Edina Liquor and Delaney Consulting this spring to study our customer base and market positioning. A key finding from the study was that Edina Liquor does not consistently communicate its value proposition to attract or retain customers. Clearly communicating our brand value is critical given the increasingly competitive nature of the liquor business and the potential for new liquor outlets located just outside the Edina border. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, Director of Engineering Date: August 20, 2013 A a (Le v � �y 1868 Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is © Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request For Purchase - Contract No. ENG 13 -17NB — Vernon Ave and Hansen Road Right Turn Lane Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 9, 2013 Company: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: October 9, 2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $74,239.22 $79,531.00 $74,239.22 Hennepin County has plans for a mill and overlay along Vernon Ave between TH Highway 62 to 53rd St W for this September / October. Staff has been working with Hennepin County to install dedicated bike lanes along Vernon Ave as part of the mill and overlay project. Hennepin County has determined that dedicated bike lanes will fit between Gleason Rd and 53rd St W, except at Hansen Rd. This project includes widening and constructing a right turn lane along Vernon Ave at the intersection of Hansen Rd to accommodate dedicated bike lanes along Vernon Ave. The City plans on getting this work completed prior to Hennepin County's mill and overlay. This project will be funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. GAPWICENTRAL SVCSIENG DIVIPROJECTSICONTRACTSI2013 \ENG 13 -17NB Vernon Hansen Right Turn La1A253 Right turn Lane on Vernon at HansenWDMIMMISCNtem IV.D. Request for Purchase - Contract No. ENG 13 -17NB - Vernon—Hansen Right Turn Lane.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 w� o e rl�` • ,�roAPORA��9 • 1899 To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #: IV. E. From: Laura Adler, Water Resources Coordinator Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 20, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Engineering Services - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Update Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for Engineering Services for the revision of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Information / Background: Attached is the proposal from WSB & Associates, Inc. for engineering services for revision of the city's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The fee for these services is $31,900; these services were included in the 2013 CIP under ENG -13 -017. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency revised the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) general permit, effective August 1, 2013. Due to this revision, the city must update its Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to meet the new requirements. This revision will be prepared by WSB and Associates with oversight of Staff and will be.presented to the Council for consideration. Attachments: Proposal of Engineering Services for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Update dated August 12, 2013. GAI'MINFRAMUTILITIES DIVISTORM SEWER \Plans and Permits\2013 SWPPP\Item IV. E Engineering Services — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Update City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 WSB & dssoddl& file. engineering-planning- environmental- construction ' August 12, 2013 Ms. Laura Adler City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 Re: MS4 Program Update Dear Ms. Adler 701 Xenia Avenue South` Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 -541 -4800 Pax'.763- 5.41 =1700' This letter contains a scope of work for the WSB's MS4 stormwater program. This scope has been developed based on our conversations with you and the needs of Edina: WSB's M94 work plan will help the City meet its current requirements as well as prepare the community for the changes in the MS4 permit. The updated permit became law on August 1, 2013 and the Cittyy will need to submit their application for permit reauthorization by December 29, 2013. This scope of services will help the City revise its existing permit to meet the requirements of-the new permit. Task 1: MS4 Program Assessment The MS4 Program Assessment includes identifying gaps in the City's existing•permit, preparing. a summary of anticipated program changes, assessing the current program, and completing an evaluation of the City's existing program. Gaps Analysis (September 2013) The Gaps Analysis Report will help the City determine where the current program, will have deficiencies according to "the new MS4 general permit. The Gaps Analysis - Report will include one meeting with the: City's Water Resources Coordinator. The information gathered during the gaps analysis will be used to begin identifying potential program changes. This analysis will also identify the costs of potential changes so the City is able. to make decisions on how to build or-expand on.any existing program components. This gaps analysis will summarize -all potential program changes. Outline of Proposed SWPPP Revisions (September 2013). The information gathered during ihb Gaps Analysis will be used to develop a summary of major anticipated program revision §: Developing a summary of program changes at this stage will be helpful prior to completing the program assessment so that feedback can be St clouds•nneapolis • St: Paul Equal Ogpprturlity. Employer _ y eng.com .. w. npdcs m=41pmpo:ots%2013�- dim_ms4 2013_08 1213.docx Ms. Laura Adler August 12, 2013 Page 2 obtained during the program assessment regarding specific changes that may occur with the City's MS4 program. Program Assessment (September — October 2013) WSB's MS4 project team will assist you with assessment of the current Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). The program assessment will be conducted during three separate meetings and will include the following departments: • Engineering • Planning/Inspections • Communications • Public Works . • Pan ks This will be used as not only an informational gathering session, but as an opportunity to present ideas that could be implemented into the City's MS4 program. A report summarizing the findings of the assessment will be provided as a part of this analysis and will include the following: e Summary of interviews with City staff • Review of existing BMPs, CWRMP, WHPP, Ordinances, TMDLs, storm sewer system mapping, and Watershed Requirements e Facilities inspections • Cost analysis for program implementation to help the City make decisions on how to build or expand on any existing program components. Task 1 Deliverables: Meetings • Gaps analysis discussion with Water Resource Coordinator • Staff interviews (3 separate meetings) • Facilities inspections Reports /summaries • Gaps analysis • Outline of proposed program changes • Facilities inspection and BMP recommendations • Program assessment Completing these tasks is critical to updating the MS4 program and it will allow the City of Edina to have confidence thatlhc updates to their M IS4 program will meet the new MS4 permit requirements. ..- mPa.V.ayaop—t,\zou\.&.� ..42013 as1a IA- Ms. Laura Adler August 12, 2013 Page 3 Task 2: SWPPP Revisions This describes the activities that the City will take to revise their MS4 program and create their revised SWPPP. The SWPPP is all the programs that define and make up the City's MS4 program and are not the BMP sheets alone. These may include revisions to BMPs sheets along with the activities identified below. Identify Partnerships (October 2013) This will include a summary of existing partnerships the City currently has. Identify if new partnerships are warranted and update the appropriate BMP sheets. Prioritize Education (October 2013) This activity will include recommendations for focusing on a high priority stormwater related issues to be emphasized for education and outreach during the permit term. (e.g.; specific TMDL reduction targets, changing local business practices, promoting adoption of the residential BMPs). Organization Chart (October 2013) With assistance from the City, we will develop an organizational chart to identify what departments are responsible for specific BMP activities. Mapping and Inventory (October 2013) Mapping and Inventory will include a procedure and process for updating the storm sewer system map, if gaps were identified during the program assessment. If map updates are necessary a schedule will be included along with measurable goals. In addition, the City will need to submit the MPCA required pond inventory within 12 months of the date the permit coverage is extended. It is assumed that the City has comprehensive map of their system; however, if significant work is necessary to update the storm water system mapping WSB will provide a separate scope for the completion of this work. Enforcement Response Procedures (October 2013) WSB will develop the Enforcement Response Procedures (ERPs) that will describe procedures and circumstances for the implementation of verbal warnings, written notices, and escalated enforcement measures. The enforcement response procedure will be developed to compel compliance with the illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction site erosion and sediment control, and post - construction stormwater management requirements. sr.%Vdesk=4lpropomis120131edins ms4 2013 091213.d= Ms. Laura Adler August 12, 2013 Page 4 0 Written Procedures (October 2013) Written procedures will be created for pollution prevention/good housekeeping, responding to known/suspected illicit discharges, completing site plans reviews and site inspection, storm sewer inspections and maintenance, employee training, and program documentation. These may come in the form of checklists, BMP cut sheets, and standardized inspections forms /letters. Ordinances (October 2013) The City is currently developing policies for implementation of ordinances 411.05 and/or 425 and, 850.07. WSB will assist with the following tasks: • Assistance with development of a credit system towards stormwater utility fees where BMPs are implemented • Identification of BMP sizes and costs based on policy requirements Other tasks that may be provided as a part of a separate scope include the following: • Development of standard details • Development of typical lot stormwater management plans/BMP layouts Long -term Maintenance (October 2013) This will include reviewing the.existing regulatory mechanisms to determine how the City ensures long -term maintenance of private systems draining to the City's storm sewer system. This will include developing post construction regulatory language that will allow the MS4 to conduct inspections, perform maintenance, and assess costs to maintain structural stormwater BMPs constructed after the effective date of this permit. Facilities Inventory (October 2013) The Facilities Inventory will include compiling the information that was gathered during the program assessment to develop a GIS inventory of all municipally owned /operated facilities. This inventory will include a map and a spreadsheet of all material being stored along with BMPs designed to prevent discharges of pollutants in stormwater. Pond Assessment Procedures (October 2013) This will include identifying procedures and methods for evaluating the TSS and TP treatment effectiveness of MS4 owned/operated ponds within the City. This will include measurable goals and a schedule for completing this activity. This will also include a discussion regarding WSB's Storm Water Asset Management Program (SWAMP), which is intended fulfill this MS4 requirement as well prioritize pond inspection and maintenance to occur in a cost effective manner. w: lnpdn\w4�propomis12013kdina_ms4 2013_081 213.d= Ms. Laura Adler August 12, 2013 Page 5 Training (October 2013) Development of a comprehensive training program is critical to the foundation of any MS4 program. It is important to communicate to all City staff how their role may be impacting stormwater pollution. WSB completes annual training for numerous MS4 communities. We will recommend the incorporation of this training or something comparable into your annual program. TMDLs (October 2013) This will include taking all the approved TMDLs that were identified during the program assessment process and identifying all activities that will be completed to achieve compliance with the TMDL Waste Load Allocation (WLA) reduction requirements. This will include identifying progress towards meeting the TMDL goals, BMPs either implemented or planned to be implemented, an estimate of cumulative load reductions, and a narrative describing what strategies will be taken if the WLA is not being achieved by the-desired date. Record Keeping (October 2013) WSB will work with the City to identify mechanisms to successfully track and report activities that are occurring in the City. This will include reviewing the City's existing tools being utilized to track their current programs and recommendations for developing or utilizing new tools. Task 2 Deliverables: • Meetings • Identification of partnerships • Prioritization of education • Organization chart • Mapping procedures and recommendations • Enforcement response procedures • Written procedures • Ordinance review • Long -term maintenance review and regulatory language development a Facilities inventory o GIS mapping and compilation of database a Pond assessment procedures TMDL review and process for meetings goals e Record keeping recommendations ,rinpd.\- 4�— p.s.I,X2013\ed'ma ms42013_ 31213.dacr Ms. Laura Adler August 12, 2013 Page 6 Task 3: Submittal of Application for Reauthorization (October 2013) All the work completed up to this point will help the City to understand what revisions they plan to make to the City's MS4 program and the cost implications of making those changes. This task will include preparing the application for reauthorization for discussion with the City staff. Task 3 includes working with the City to fill out and submit the application for reauthorization to receive permit coverage. The City is required to submit this by December 29, 2013. Task 3 Deliverables: • Application for reauthorization • Overview of program changes for City Council consideration Schedule . It is anticipated that the work outlined above will be completed in September and October. This information will be presented to the City Council on November 19, 2013. Cost This proposal outlines the work needed to complete the tasks associated with the WSB MS4 program, in accordance with the Master Agreement for Professional Services dated June 18, 2013. WSB proposes to complete these tasks above for an hourly reimbursable cost of $31,900 (Table 1). Table 1. Cost Estimate Tasks Cost Task 1 Meetings 4 $2,100 Gaps Analysis $1,000 Outline of Proposed SWPPP Revisions $1,000 Program Assessment $3,400 Sub Total $7,500 Task 2 Meetings 2 $1,000 Revisions to existing BMP sheets $3,100 Identify partnerships $300 Prioritize education $300 Organizational chart $500 Mapping and inventory $500 Enforcement response procedures $2,600 Written procedures $2,600 w. lnpdezlmz4�opawlz12013�sdinu _ms4 2013_031213.d- Ms. Laura Adler August 12, 2013 Page 7 Tasks Cost Ordinances $4,800 Long-term maintenance review $2,100 Facilities inventory $2,100 Pond assessment procedures $300 Training $200 TMDL review $1,300 Record keeping recommendations $300 Sub Total $22,000 Task 3 Application for Reauthorization $1,400 Overview of program changes for Council consideration $1,000 Sub Total $2,400 TOTAL PROJECT COST $31,900 All other tasks will be separate work plans billed as hourly or other directive ordered by the City. This letter represents our complete understanding of the MS4 regulatory program and the proposed scope of services. If you are in agreement with the scope of services and proposed fee, please sign in the appropriate space below and return one copy to us. We appreciate the opportunity to share this proposal wit you, and look forward to working with the City of Edina efficiently bring your MS4 Program into compliance. If you have any questions about this proposal, please contact me at 651- 286 -8464 or jcarlson @wsbeng.com. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jesse Carlson Water Resources Project Manager w4rpdes\ms4\prop=Ls12013bdim ms42013 081213.dmx Ms. Laura Adler August 12, 2013 Page 8 ACCEPTED BY: City of Edina Name Signature Date va�a�,�,zoi3�a �a2oi3 osiz13.aa To: Mayor and City Council From: Laura Adler, Water Resources Coordinator t14 A. �CORPORA't/ �68s Agenda Item #: IV. F. Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 20, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Order Minor Plan Amendment to the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Action Requested: Order Minor Plan Amendment to the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Information / Background: History The city has provided services for a number of lakes and ponds for many years. Some of the lakes are treated to reduce aquatic vegetation and algae at the city's expense; some are managed more aggressively with the costs assessed to surrounding homeowners. There are currently 39 lakes and ponds treated at the city's expense. The number of lakes treated has increased throughout the years, and as a result there is no standard service level. In addition to the aquatic vegetation management we provide, some lakes also have aerators, pumps to add water to the lake when levels are low, pumps to take water out of the lake when levels are high, and are stocked with fish. In late 2012, the Engineering Department took over contract management for these services and has identified the following issues: Varying Level of Service Some lakeshore owners want a higher level of service than the city typically provides for aquatic vegetation management. These lakeshore owners have come to the city and asked us to manage aquatic vegetation contracts, and then special assess the cost back to them. There are currently three lakes that go through the special assessment process: Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, and Mill Pond. In some cases, lakeshore owners have differing desires for lakes. This is an issue with Melody Lake. The City operates a pump that is used to lower the level of the lake to reduce the risk of flooding. Staff often receives conflicting requests from lakeshore owners; some want the lake level lower, and some want it higher. With no clear policy guiding staff, and no official representation from the lakeshore owners, staff are placed in the difficult position of trying to balance the needs and wants of the lakeshore owners. Lake level is one type of conflict, other potential conflicts include; prioritization of type, location and surface area of the treatment, and the use and timing of aquatic herbicides application. Ecosystem Balance Lakes and ponds are complex systems. They include living components, such as plants, animals, and microorganisms, and their growth are driven by environmental factors such as sunlight, water temperature, wind, and chemical interactions. Each lake and pond has its own balance between these components. Changes in any of them can have major impacts on the lake's ecosystem, causing excess plant growth or fish City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 die -off. When changes are introduced into the system, whether through urbanization, a desire for a specific type of look, or creating recreational opportunities (like boating or fishing), the ecosystem is changed. Under current practices, only one or two aspects of the lake are evaluated and managed for. This can have unintended and undesired consequences on other aspects of the lake's ecosystem. The current practice is to manage most water bodies exclusively for a range of aquatic plants. This approach has the potential to sacrifice other management outcomes such as fishery productivity, water clarity, or waterfowl habitat. Contract Management. Transparency and Public Process The process to manage the service contracts for these lakes has problems. There is no set way that a new group of lakeshore owners could set up a similar service for their lake. On the lakes that are already special assessed, staff have generally worked with a single contact from the lakeshore owners, but that contact does not have any authority to actually speak for the rest of the lakeshore owners. Prior to this year, quotes were not regularly requested, as is now required by the city's purchasing policy. Staff requested quotes this year, and due to the prices that came in, contracted with a company that was not the residents' first choice. There was no method in place to make the choice for a more expensive company, since there was no official representation for the lakeshore owners. This contract process also brought to light the uneven and undefined service expectation. Public Purpose and Prioritization For new service requests, no criteria exist to determine which lakes and ponds are eligible, and for what types of treatment. For lakes and ponds with existing service, staff judgment is unguided by policy when balancing how public money is spent and how to prioritize public benefits. Consider Lake Pamela: this is a 17 acre lake, with public access, and approximately half of it is bordered by a large park. The public clearly benefits from the treatment of this lake. Compare that to a pond such as St. John's Pond (near 56th Street and St. John's Avenue): this is a small pond, approximately 1/3 acre, surrounded by a small number of private residences. There is no public access, and while the neighboring residents benefit from the pond's treatment, the general public does not. However, the city pays for similar treatment on both waterbodies. There are many other lakes and ponds within the city of similar size and condition to St. John's Pond that receive no treatment at all. Overall, the current process for managing lakes and ponds lacks transparency, policy direction, and cohesiveness. Establishing a clear policy to guide the management of lakes and ponds would be a way to resolve these issues. Proposed Solution /Process Staff recommends formalizing lake and pond service policy by creating a minor plan amendment to the city's Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. The policy would create a framework for determining public benefit of waterbodies, setting service levels, prioritizing treatment, and ensuring that public money is efficiently spent for public benefit. Other cities which provide aquatic plant management services establish the public benefit, service levels, and prioritization based on a number of criteria. These criteria include the size of the water body, public access, or the ability of the lake to sustain fish. Determining a set of criteria for evaluating the water bodies will allow staff to provide consistent treatment. In cases where riparian owners want a higher service level than the city provides or wish to take part prioritizing and determining service level, the policy would lay out a path to follow to organize with neighbors, and request that the city contract for the services and special assess the cost to the benefitting properties. Including the policy in the CWRMP will ensure that the process is transparent to all stakeholders, including residents, watershed organizations, and state agencies. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Public Process Page 3 A minor amendment to the CWRMP requires, at a minimum, that the Council approve the draft amendment. The draft amendment is then sent to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for a 60 day review. At the same time, the draft amendment is sent to the Met Council for a 45 day review. If all agencies approve the draft amendment, it comes back to the city for official adoption by the Council. In addition to required public process, staff proposes a stakeholder process as a part of drafting the amendment. Stakeholders include riparian owners, with existing special assessments and without, watershed management organizations, state agencies, and park and water body users. This would allow staff to engage stakeholders in the process, increasing buy -in and.addressing concerns in the amendment If the Council elects to order this amendment to the CWRMP, Staff will gather input from stakeholders, draft the minor amendment, share the draft with stakeholders, iterate changes and submit the final consensus for council review. G: \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENVIRONMENT DIV\Lakes and Ponds \Item IVY. Minor Plan Amendment.docx A.1 \1? I � Y ow le , • ,N�bRpot,,, ease To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. G. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 20, 2013. Information ❑ Subject: Release of Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement Action Requested: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to approve attached Release of Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement. Information / Background: On May 2, 2013, the property owners entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement. The property owners have requested that the City release the subject property from the Public Improvement and Special Assessment. The property owners have paid the special assessment referenced in the Special Assessment Agreement. Attachments: Release of Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PR0JECTS \C0NTRACTS \2012 \ENG 12-4 Richmond Hills \SS471 \Release of Agreements \Item W.G. Approve Special Assessment Agreements.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 (Reserved for Recording Data) RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS: A. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Thomas B. Divine and Marie R. Divine, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Properly Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 2, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on May 30, 2013, as Document No. T05081006 over property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property "); B. - The City has been requested by Property Owners to release the Subject Property from the Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement; and C. The Property Owners have paid the special assessments referenced in the Special Assessment Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: insi5vi The Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as Document No. T05081006 is hereby released. Dated: CITY OF EDINA :_ STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland, Mayor Debra Mangen, City Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by James Hovland and Debra Mangen, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite #317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 651- 452 -5000 RNK/cjh 171815v1 2 EXHIBIT A Lot 22, Stow's Yvonne Terrace, Hennepin County, Minnesota. insisvi L4l �oeD t AMD SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made thisAkI L day of a , 2013, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporatio ( "City ") and THOMAS B. DIVINE AND MARIE R. DIVINE, husband and wife (the "Property Owners "). RECITALS A. Property Owners are the owners of Lot 22, Stow's Yvonne Terrace, Hennepin County, Minnesota, having a street address of 5009 Yvonne Terrace, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owners replace the existing sewer service 'line(s) from the trurik sanitary sewer pipe to the righi -o way 'line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 12 -4. C. Property Owners have . replaced their sewer and have requested that the . City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES.AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owners received a quote of $3,000.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45`h Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owners entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1053 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1053 for the amount of $3,000.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL, ASSESSMENT.. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,000.00 against the'Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 12 -4. The Property Owners waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 12 -4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owners waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING. EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owners and the Property Owners' successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. 169847v1 ENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 J PROPERTY OWNERS: Karen K. Bretson, as Attorney -in -Fact for Thomas B. Divine Karen K. Bretson, as Attomey -in -Fact for Marie R. Divine STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )Ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o2 0 day of , 2013, by Karen K. Bretson, as Attorney -in -Fact for Thomas B. Divine and Marie R. Divine, husband and wife. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651- 452 -5000 RNK/cjh 169847v1 ki 4 i • ----------------- MARJORIE J BERGMAN lift NOTARY PUBUC•MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31.2017 AAAAAAA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- James B. Hovland, Mayor AND: cott H. Neal, i Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 'n A The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of "� VVII 2013, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and C' Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ,Notary Public SHARON M. ALLISON NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA Ny CommissIm Expires,10. 31, 2015 169847v1 2 NA, atte ,92 -ly . ,A Eo . ��oRrocan'� lase To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. H. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 20, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Special Assessment Agreement Action Requested: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to approve attached Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement for sanitary sewer and water services for the 2013 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction areas. Information / Background: For the 2013 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction projects, residents in the Normandale Neighborhood project area were required to upgrade their sanitary sewer service line from the mainline to the right -of- way line and were encouraged to upgrade the entire line to their house, as well as their water service line. Residents in the other project areas were encouraged to do the same upgrades. Residents requested that the extra cost be added to the special assessment for the project. Our City Attorney prepared the attached agreement, which adds this cost to the final special assessment cost which will be known at the end of the project. Attachment: One Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement (Lake Edina Neighborhood) G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PR0JECTS \C0NTRACTS \2013 \ENG 13-4 Lake Edina \SS477 Lake Edina A \ADMIN \MISC \Item W.H. Approve Special Assessment Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ib day of , 2013, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and STEPHEN J. GRIFFITHS AND KIMBERLY A. GRIFFITHS, husband and wife (the "Property Owners "). RECITALS A. Property Owners are. the owners of Lot 2, Block 1, Lake Edina Addition Block One Replat, Hennepin County, Minnesota, having a street address of 4812 Larkspur Lane, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owners replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 13-4. C. Property Owners have. replaced their utility service line(s) and have requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owners received a quote of $7,650.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. - Property Owners entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2558 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an. invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2558 for the amount of , 7 650.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed 'and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $7,650.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 13 -4. The Property Owners waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 13-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the. benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owners waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT ;.RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owners and the Property Owners' successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. 169955v 1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 PROPERTY OWNERS: Stephen . Griffiths A 6— Kimberly A. ffiths STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF )SS. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of -T� I w , 2013, by Stephen J. Griffiths and Kimberly A. Griffiths, husband and wife. NOTARY PUBLIC �t r . MONET J. EPPS NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires January 31, 2018 169955v1 2 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )Ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City 1V1d11lagCi of ule %ALY vi r-Uma, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the Corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651 -452 -5000 RNK:cjh 169955vl 3 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Engineering Date: August 20, 2013 Subject: Traffic Safety Report Of July 3, 2013 Le � r� • ,�CORPOAP`�� • )BBB Agenda Item M IV. I. Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 3, 2013. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the July 3, 2013, Traffic Safety Committee Report at their July 18 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval, see attached draft minutes. Attachments: Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 3, 2013 Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2013 G:\ Engineering \lnfrzsvucwre \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports \2013 \Item IV. I. Traffic Safety Report of July 3, 2013.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Byron Theis — Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: July 18, 2013 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 3, 2013 w91NA �1 ow e v � �y • ,MC�RPORt`T�O • lBee Agenda Item M VI. D. Action M Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Review and recommend Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of Wednesday, July 3, 2013, be forwarded to City Council for approval. Information / Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the meeting regarding any of the attached issues. An overview of the comments from the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) will be included in the staff report provided to Council for their August 20, 2013, meeting. Attachments: Traffic Safety Committee Report for July 3, 2013. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \Staff Review Summaries \13 TSAC & Min \07 -03- 13.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Wednesday, July 3, 2013 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on July 3. The Director of Engineering, Public Works Director, the Assistant City Planner, the Transportation Planner, Sign Coordinator, and Traffic Safety Coordinator were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the July 18, Edina Transportation Commission and the August 20 City Council agenda. SECTION A: Requests on ;�;hi�h the r-mmittee re:nmmcnrlc annrnuni- ..y.. •-rr. Request for parking restrictions in the area of 5821 Zenith Avenue. This request comes from the relative of the resident who lives at 5821 Zenith Avenue. The requestor states that they require Metro Mobility bus to pick up /drop off in front of the residence for travel. The requestor has noticed that sometimes vehicles park in front of the residence, making pick up /drop of difficult. The requestor was interested in finding a solution that would always allow the mobility bus to park in front of the residence. Photos are provided below. Zenith Avenue is a local roadway with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 135 vehicles, and an 85th percentile speed of 20.6 MPH. It is a 28 foot wide bituminous street with no curb and gutter. There are currently no parking restrictions in the area. The TSC discussed using signs that state, "No parking, loading zone" in the area. There are other areas where, "no parking, loading zone" signs are used for Metro Mobility buses. Staff recommends the approval of "No parking, loading zone" at 5821 Zenith Avenue. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page I of 9 July 3, 2013 14 5924 5928 29 15614 5637 5672 $637 5632 519 6 5808 `5629 5628 5637 5628 5637 5637 5711 5717 5701 5700 5637 5672 5641 5635 S1TM 5 5701 5700 5729 5730 5729 5733 5836 5933 5700 5705 5704 5705 5704 5741 5745 57(( 5707 5749 5748 5749 5753 5856 5701 5700 5701 5700 5704 5709 5708 5709 5708 5705 5704 5705 570( 5705 5708 5713 5712 5713 5712 5708 5709 5708 5709 5712 5717 5716 5717 5716 5709 5713 5772 5717 5712 5713 5716 5711 5720 5721 5720 5716 5717 5716 5717 5710 5715 5125 5725 5724 5777 572< 5711 5720 5721 5724 5729 5728 5719 5718 5715 5728 5725 5711 5725 5728 5731 5772 5777 5771 5729 5732 5729 5728 5729 5772 5737 5736 5777 5736 5773 5736 S7J3 5732 5773 57)6 5741 5740 5711 57(0 SB7N Sl W 5801 5800 5807 5800 5807 5 5800 5801 5801 5805 5801 5805 5801 5805 801 5805 5800 5805 5808 5809 5808 5809 5808 5809 8 5809 5808 5809 5813 5812 581 5812 5817 581 5817 5812 5811 5817 5016 w 58 7 5816 5817 581 5817 5817 5816 5821 5820 ¢ I 5810 w ¢ 5811 _ 582 5821 5818 5821 5810 5825 5824 58 5824 5825 58 5825 5824 5825 5821 5828 5829 5828 5819 28 5829 5828 5829 5832 SSj7 872 5877 5831 5873 5832 5879 5818 5877 5836 5837 587 7 5836 5877 5876 5833 5832 5817 5840 3851 5810 5841 5810 SBSf SBIS w 5837 W36 SSiS 5841 5815 5844 5845 5844 5645 5818 5901 5900 59TH 5T W 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5901 5900 5905 5904 5905 5904 5905 5901 5905 5904 5905 5904 5909 5908 5909 5908 5909 5908 5909 5908 5909 5908 5913 5912 5913 5912 5917 5912 5913 5912 5973 5912 y 5917 59 16 5917 5918 5917 5918 5917 5916 5917 5916 > 5021 ¢ 5920 5921 5910 5921 5920 4 5911 5920 5911 5920 5915 5925 5915 5924 5925 st 5921 ? 5925 3921 u�q4 �^ 5925 1924 5928 m 5933 -- 5918 5919 5977 5932 5919 5973 5918 5932 5929 59.73 L"32 5929 5932 I I I 1 1� �� �� ��1 34163412340 37163716 371 7216 3211.7zoa ,zoo, 7116 771 5933 5936 3405 I I -, I 3304 320( 3104 60TH 37W u.a�ma.:,waa;[m��ge �c�:oce cc:aw 6001 6000 6001 6000 p Map: Zenith Avenue near 58`h Street Traffic Safety Committee Report July 3, 2013 5634 5633 5635 5640 5637 5641 5646 5645 3021 5700 5701 5707 5808 5705 5815 5708 5909 5711 5712 5711 5717 5716 5717 5721 5720 5711 5725 5724 5725 5729 5730 5729 5733 5836 5933 5737 5736 5735 5741 5740 5741 5745 57(( 5745 5749 5748 5749 5753 5856 5857 5757 5756 5757 5801 5 805 5800 5801 580: 5808 5905 5815 5812 5909 5811 5816 5973 5917 5820 5917 5827 5814 5921 5827 5828 5809 5833 5832 5929 5837 5836 5933 5841 5840 5937 5845 5844 5941 5849 5848 5853 5852 5853 5857 5856 5857 5901 5900 5901 5905 5904 5905 5909 5908 5909 5913 5912 5973 5917 5916 5917 5921 5910 5921 5925 5924 5925 5929 5928 5929 5933 5932 5933 5937 5936 5937 5941 5940 5941 5945 3008 3000 2924 1920 3018 1916 3015 6000 6001 Page 2 of 9 Photo: 5821 Zenith looking south Photo: 5821 Zenith looking north Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 3 of 9 July 3, 2013 2. Request for pedestrian crossing lights at the intersection of 66th Street West and Southdale Road. This request is from a resident who uses the park frequently. The requestor states that vehicles are not stopping for pedestrians at this intersection. The requestor also states that he was hit by a car going through this intersection. Requestor would like to increase the visibility of the crosswalk. A map and photos are provided below. 18GI7WAY 82 ES 1a4Y62 TO VAL EF VE- YVR, B477f S7 W 24 �1 4377 4313 24 4311 t 1 • R-TaM Park 4300 �77YW627O�,�A�S 4018 4010 r 457y37� 4 1 �r a � 4075 T 4005 SB7175TW 6609 4207 24 4305 4301 6600 fi6 6604 6 5 6604 6608 667 6608 6612 6609 6627 6612 6616 6673 6616 6625 6620 6620 6617 6629 6624 6624 6621 --- -} 5, 6701 l7j 6700 6701 t 6700 p /ti Lake Cornelia 24 6704 % 6705 6704 6709 A r^ 6705 24 6708 6709 6708 6713 _ 6708 � � \ 6112 6800 6717 iB771S7W 6712 6716 6713 6717 ua aamf++akGls.cmr4'e lc 1 -��� % 6801 0 Map: 66`h Street West and Southdale Road 6400 Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 4 of 9 July 3, 2013 Ane op dommow- w. r Marked pedestrian crosswalks can be enhanced as outlined in the City of Edina Local Traffic Control section. It states: Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks • Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the "Vehicle Gap Time" This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: • More than five gaps — pavement marking and signage only. • Four to five gaps — add activated pedestal mounted flasher. • Less than three gaps — add activated overhead mounted flasher The gaps counted in the area averaged 4 gaps during the peak hour at 5 P.M.. This crosswalk would qualify for an activated pedestal mounted flasher. 66th Street West is classified as a Collector Street with an ADT of 9823 vehicles and an 85th percentile speed of 33.5 MPH. It is a 38 foot wide bituminous street with insurmountable curb and gutter on both sides. Sidewalks are on both sides and marked crosswalks at Southdale Road. There is no report of the crash involving pedestrians. Staff recommends approval of installation of activated pedestal mounted flasher for the crosswalk located at 66t4 Street West and Southdale Road. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: At this time, there are no requests that are recommended for denial. SECTION C: Requests that are referred to a later date: I . Request for pedestrian improvements at the intersection of Valley View Road and Chapel Lane. This request is from a crossing guard supervisor for the school. The requestor states that vehicles are not yielding to pedestrians in the crosswalk. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 6 of 9 July 3, 2013 6621 6612 6608 6617 �7, y 6625 66 }6 0 6629 6A17 6632 6610 6625 6621 6677 6750 620! 6701 6712 6708 6701 6200 6716 6700 6705 SET 6720 6701 'VS � 6205 'S 6709 6705 6201 6724 6717 6709 24 6717 6728 3 6717 1 6721 6772 .1 6711 6772 6768 6764 ' 760 6807 680 1 167 n VALLEY VW-WRD 6600 6801 6010 6016 6012 6008 6004 6000 5908 5904 5900 � 6 6804 6808 6 g1APa OR 6805 6812 6808 6027 6017 E013 6009 6005 6007 5905 5901 6809 6025 6811 5917 6811 6816 G81J 6817 6016 6011 6008 6004 6000 6816 6817 5917 6816 6817 6020 6908 6820 BNANP DR 6821 5911 6820 6821 ?� 6821 6024 6017 6077 6009 6005 6007 6825 6824 6825 6821 g 6907 5913 6028 6016 6012 6008 6004 6000 6917 6829 6900 6901 6828 6001 6905 6911 my TER 6904 6832 6005 6907 6836 6840 6029 6025 6021 6017 6017 6009 6908 6909 6909 6909 6012 6008 6912 6907 6905 24 6996 6994 61 00 6000 5920 5972 6111 6110 677fi 6112 f 7000 6990 24 6013 Q,� 5900 6917 6128 6005 aoq ��AEVi Cm�"y[ IC) t04YS 6621]5 kYAI Map: Valley View Road and Chapel Lane Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 7 of 9 July 3, 2013 Photo: Chapel Lane and Valley View Road, looking west Photo: Valley View Road, looking north Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 8 of 9 July 3, 2013 The criterion for placement of crosswalks and type of control is outlined within the City of Edina Local Traffic Control list. It states: Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks • Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. • Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during any eight hour period. • Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the "Vehicle Gap Time ". This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: ■ More than five gaps —pavement marking and signage only. ■ Four to five gaps — add activated pedestal mounted flasher. ■ Less than three gaps — add activated overhead mounted flasher After discussion, staff concluded that further study is needed. Staff will gather additional traffic counts, along with discussing issue with the school district. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. I. Request for speed counts to be done on 66th Street West near the intersection of Wilryan Avenue. Requestor states that vehicles are speeding through the area. 66th Street West has an ADT of 4297 vehicles and an 85th of 31.8 MPH. Speed counts were taken and forwarded to Edina Police Department (EPD) for enforcement. 2. Request for speed counts on Code Avenue near Porter Lane. Code Avenue has an ADT of 631 vehicles and an 85th of 25.6 MPH. Speed counts were taken, and forwarded to EPD for enforcement. Call from a resident about traffic volumes in Cedars of Edina Apartment complex. 'A voicemail was left with the resident, who has not called back. That parking lot is a private lot, which is not controlled by the City of Edina. 4. Call from a resident about residential construction parking. Resident states that vehicles from construction are parking on both sides of the street and possibly causing a safety issue. Resident would like temporary parking restrictions until the residential construction is completed. Resident was forwarded to EPD, who place temporary parking restriction signs. 5. Call from a resident about construction parking. Resident was interested in knowing the options when ,construction vehicles begin to park near a project. Resident was forwarded to the Redevelopment Coordinator. 6. Call from a resident regarding construction around Xerxes Avenue and TH 62. Resident was forwarded to Hennepin County, who is managing construction in the area. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 9 of 9 July 3, 2013 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 18, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaFotc j o approve the meeting agenda. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2013 — Approved as corrected. Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by m ember Whited to approve the revised minutes of June 20, 4W.B. NII Vot ij dye. Motion carded. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS) Update Transportation planner Mark Nolan presented the follow_ ing short, medium and long term plans for the PACS fund: Short Term • Prepare strategy for utilization of PACS fund • Finalize Sidewalk Priority Plan criteria e 2013 Sidewalk /Non- Motorized Transportation Facilities (NMTF) projects ■ School Road Sidewalk ■-Vernon Avenue Bike Lanes ■ .Ped.- activated pedestal -mounted flashers (Rosland Park, Edina High and Valley View Middle Schools) • Plan for 2014 sidewalk /other, NMTF projects Birchcrest B Neighborhood: Valley View & Normandale Road Sidewalks Strachauer Park D Neighborhood: W. 62nd Street Sidewalk ■ Morningside B Neighborhood: W. 42nd Street, Alder Drive & Scott Terrace Sidewalks ■ Ped- activated overhead mounted flasher: mid -block crossing at 691h (Southdale- Galleria) Medium -Lone Term • Prepare Living Streets Plan and coordinate with PACS Fund (Sidewalk Priority Plan) o Determine priority projects for future years • Update Sidewalk /Pedestrian Facilities map • Prepare for Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan update • Develop public input /outreach procedure 2014 Work Plan Update Director Houle said the only change was to the France Avenue Intersections Improvement Project to reflect the construction delay until 2014. He said they will need to finalize the plan and recommendation to City Council by August. Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 3, 2013 Brief discussion ensued regarding Sections A.1, A.2, and C.1. Updates Student Members - None Bike Edina Task Force Member Janovy said they continue to have discussion on their bylaws and to work,on the Bicycle Community Friendly application. Living Streets Working Group Chair Nelson said on July 16, they updated the City Council on the draft.Living Streets Policy and on their visits to boards and commissions that they've presented the policy to. He saicl the City Council approved the Living Streets Advisory Group and they are looking for volunteers; currently, th re'are approximately 10 -12 volunteers and they will begin meeting soon. ! ' Members Bass and Janovy suggested creating a Living Streets work plan that would include projects that other boards and commissions are working on that are Living Streets related. Chair Nelson will draft an email to the chairs of other boards and commissions to this effect. Transportation Options Working Group Member White said their next phase is to work on funding thru the Health and Human Services grant process which is due August 31. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not to keep the working group going and the conclusion was that the working group had completed its work. After discussion, motion was made by member Whited to disband the Transportation Options Working Group and the motion was seconded by member LaForce. All voted aye. Motion carried. Communications Committee a. Community Transformation Grant Member Bass said the $5,000 grant she referred to last month was the Statewide Health Improvement Program grant and not the Community Transformation Grant. She said.they are discussing ways to use the funds and will have an update in,August: Member LaForce asked for an update on the communications plan for the France Avenue Intersections Improvement that they reviewed and offered comments on. Director Houle said the plan is not finalized yet because they are still working on the urban design piece. He said they are moving forward on generating the Frequently Asked Questions and it will be routed to the committee for review before being posted to the website. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues — A letter was received from resident Dr. Frank Wei requesting a sidewalk on 66th St W. Director Houle said this location is not on the Sidewalk Plan and it is not scheduled for reconstruction any time soon. Member lyer said the location would make a good network connection. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member lyer said he would like to participate in the Living Streets Advisory Group but not as a volunteer. Member Whited asked Director Houle when 58th St. W. is scheduled for reconstruction because the asphalt is eroding. He said it is scheduled for 2014. Chair Nelson said on 66th St. W., west of TH -100, there is quite a large bump in the road. Director Houle will check to 2 see what has caused the bump. Member Laforce asked if there were any crash data for Benton Ave as you exit TH -100 south. He said this intersection continues to be unsafe. Member Janovy added that it is too wide for a two -lane roadway. Director Houle said he will add this intersection to their workload for evaluation. ' Member Janovy said she submitted a sidewalk petition to City Council on July 16. She asked if it could be incorporated into the 2014 project that is scheduled. Director Houle said staff knew the petition was coming and is already working to see if it can be incorporated. STAFF COMMENTS • Commissioner Braden resigned effective today. • The neighborhood reconstruction projects are progressing on schedule despite the weather. • The School Road sidewalk RFP was approved by City Couricil July 16. • One bid was received for France Avenue Intersections`Improvements and it was $600,000 higher than estimated; staff consulted with MnDOT to see if the federal funds would be affected if they were to reject the bid and rebid; this is not the case and on July 16,,City Council accepted staffs recommendation to rebid in the fall with construction in 2014. A second meeting was held for the Urban Design piece of this project and a third is scheduled for August 21, 7 -9 p.m:", • Hennepin County is still on schedule to mill and overlay. Vern6n Avenue; the Penn Avenue Bridge redecking is starting Monday, July 22- October 22, and traffic is detoured to Xerxes Avenue. Xerxes Avenue Bridge will be redecked next year and staff is continuing to. work with the County to improve lane designs. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. F� i ATTENDANCE ii TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE - 2013 _ NAME: ,; TERM `-J F_ M A` .M A, ~J A S O N D Work Session # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions`'., 1 8 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 7/16 1 7 88% Braden, Ann" 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2016 .1, 1 1 1 1 5 63% I er, I er 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Schwei er, Steven student 1 1 1 3 38% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% S anhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 3 50% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% 3 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: John Wallin, Finance Director Date: August 20, 2013 Subject: Allocation of 2012 General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance 'w9��llrjr O e - Cn • ,1�RPOA�'�F'9 • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. J. Action Requested: Approve proposal to allocate the 2012 General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance Information / Background: Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ The City ended 2012 with a General Fund unassigned fund balance of $1,697,872. The City Fund Balance Policy states that it is the policy of the City that, to the extent possible, such excess funds will be transferred to the Construction Fund to support capital improvements and equipment The fund balance policy also states that available fund balances shall not be used for ongoing operating expenditures. The 2013 -20717 Capital Improvement Plan funding for 2013 and 2014 projects was based on $800,000 in transfers of this unassigned balance to the Construction Fund. The Golf Course continues to build its cash deficit with the negative balance of $1,728,000 as of June 30. The bond raters Moody's and Standard and Poor's will not look on this favorability especially on top of new debt proposed this fall. The Ice Arena was hit with two issues which affected it cash balance in 2012. The first was the ice making equipment went down requiring approximately $300,000 in emergency repairs. The second issue was certain cost overruns with the Hive project led to an additional $300,000 cost. The Arena Fund as of June 30 has a cash deficit of $686,000. The equipment replacement program funding was reduced by approximately $300,000 per year in 2008 as part of the budget reduction at the time. Because of the reduction in the annual funding and inflationary increases the amount needed to fund the equipment replacement program and the expected actual costs to replace equipment is leaving a growing shortage that will within the next couple of years eliminate the balance in the fund needed to replace many pieces of equipment. The longer equipment is on the road the higher the cost to maintain it resulting in an increase in general fund expenditures. Recommendation Allocations Transfer to Construction Fund for 2013 -2014 CIP Projects $797,872 Transfer to Arena Fund for unplanned expenses in 2012 $300,000 Transfer to Golf Course Fund to start stabilizing fund deficit $300,000 Transfer to Equipment Replacement Program $300,000 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Scott Neal City Manager Date: August 20, 2013 Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -66 Amending Council Agenda Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: w9�,f� O e Cl) 0 • f y�RPOPA��O • lose Agenda Item #: IV. K. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ At the last meeting, the Council directed staff to add an item to their regular Council Agenda so that Aviation Noise Updates can be noted and posted online. As required by City Code, staff has prepared the attached resolution amending the Council's meeting agenda to include the requested item. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -66 City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St - Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -66 REVISING THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED that the Order of Business for the Edina City Council Meetings shall be changed as follows: I. Call To Order 11. Roll Call 111. Approval of Meeting Agenda IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda V. Special Recognitions and Presentations VI. Public Hearings VII. Community Comment VIII. Reports /Recommendations IX. Correspondence and Petitions X. Aviation Noise Update XI. Mayor and Council Comments XII. Manager's Miscellaneous Items XIII. Adjourn Meeting Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. Dated this 20th day of August, 2013 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 20, 2013 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk REPORT / RECOMMENDATION 10 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. L From: Bill Neuendorl' Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: August 20, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: 50rh and France Parking Improvements - Design Services & Feasibility Study Action Requested: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to execute the proposal for engineering design services. Information / Background: Professional services are needed to prepare a Feasibility Study that identifies a cost - effective strategy to improve the parking facilities in the 50th & France business district. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. was identified as the preferred design /engineering firm based on input from several property owners, business owners and City staff. Kimley -Horn retains national experts in complex parking scenarios and is familiar with the 50th and France district. This proposal takes advantage of some of the previous work conducted by Walker Parking in 2012 and includes a broader scope that is intended to provide a more comprehensive assessment of how public improvements can contribute to the economic health and prosperity of the district and Edina community. Key elements of this proposal include the following. 1) Numerous opportunities for stakeholder input so that the final design is strongly supported by property owners, businesses, residents and other customers 2) Identification of way - finding strategies and best management practices for increasing the efficient use of parking spaces 3) Streetscape improvements to update and unify the shopping experience 4) Study of expansion options at North Parking Ramp, including new commercial space on the street level as well as options for improving the South and Middle Ramps 5) Prioritizing repair and rehabilitation needs of all existing ramps b) Preparation of alternative strategies to achieve parking and wayfinding goals of the district 7) Preparation of Feasibility Report that quantifies scope, costs and financing strategies for the preferred strategy 8) Design documents for priority repairs in 2013 9) Design documents for lighting improvements in 2013 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 The maximum cost of this work will be $260,000. In accordance with City Code, the cost of this work will be assessed back to the commercial properties that enjoy the shared benefits. Upon successful completion and City acceptance of the Feasibility Study in December 2013, Kimley -Horn is anticipated to be re- engaged to prepare design documents so that the preferred solution can be implemented and constructed in 2014 -2015. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the attached proposal and service agreement. Attachments: Kimley Horn proposal / supplemental agreement dated August 16, 2013 Engineering Services Master Agreement dated August 16, 2013 MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 50th & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements AGREEMENT made between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "OWNER ", and KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter called the "ENGINEER ". OWNER intends to secure professional ENGINEERING services, according to the terms of this Agreement dated August 16, 2013. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT OWNER intends to secure professional consulting engineering, architectural, planning and/or land survey services on an ongoing basis for general City services and multiple projects, according to the terms of this agreement. OWNER and ENGINEER shall enter into project specific supplemental agreements. This Master Agreement shall be deemed incorporated into the Supplemental Agreements unless a Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that it is not incorporated. If there is a conflict between the terms of the Supplemental Agreement and the Master Agreement, the terms of the Master Agreement shall control unless the Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that despite the conflict the terms of the Supplemental Agreement apply. 2. PUBLIC IlOPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER 2.1 STUDY AND REPORT PHASE / FEASIBILITY REPORT 2.1.1. Consult with OWNER to clarify and define OWNER'S requirements for the Project, review available data and attend necessary meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.1.2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER'S providing or obtaining from others data or services of the types described in paragraph 4, and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services. 2.1.3. Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project and participate in consultations with such authorities. 2.1.4. Provide analyses of OWNER'S needs, planning surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions. 2.1.5. Provide a general cost / benefit analysis of OWNER'S requirements applicable to various alternatives. Doe. 4170480v -2 50 and France Improvements RNK: 6/12/2013 Page 1 August 16, 2013 2.3 FINAL DESIGN PHASE 2.3.1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Design documents, the City's design standards, and the revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs prepare for incorporation in the Bidding Documents final drawings to show the general scope, extent and character of the work to be furnished and performed by Contractor(s) (hereinafter called 'Plans ") and Specifications. 2.3.2. Provide technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for use in filing applications for permits with or obtaining approvals of such governmental authorities as have jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project, and assist OWNER in consultations with appropriate authorities. The ENGINEER shall submit all applications and permit support data to the appropriate agencies and submit copies to the OWNER. 2.3.3. Based on property information received from Owner in accordance with Paragraph 4.4, provide legal descriptions and exhibits for all easements, property surveys or related engineering services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and engineering surveys and staking to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with their work. 2.3.4. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project Costs caused by changes in general scope, extent or character or design requirements of the Project or Construction Costs. Furnish to OWNER a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs based on the Plans and Specifications. 2.3.5. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where appropriate) bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of other related documents. 2.3.6. Attend necessary hearings and meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.3.7. Furnish three (3) copies of the listed Final Design documents, including the Plans and Specifications, and present and review them in person with OWNER. 2.3.8. The ENGINEER shall famish one copy of all design calculations when requested by OWNER. 2.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATING PHASE 2.4.1. The ENGINEER shall prepare and forward the Advertisement for Bids to the designated publications, official newspaper and the OWNER. The ENGINEER shall supply up to thirty (30) sets of full size final Plans and Specifications for use in obtaining bids and submitting for general review. The ENGINEER shall maintain a record of prospective bidders to whom Bidding Documents have been issued, attend pre -bid meetings and receive and process deposits for Bidding Documents. 2.4.2. Prepare Contract Documents. Doc. 4170480v.2 50'h and France Improvements RNK: 6/12/2013 Page 3 August 16, 2013 experienced and qualified design professional, to provide for OWNER a greater degree of confidence that the completed work of Contractor(s) will conform to the Contract Documents and that the integrity of the design concept as reflected in the Contract Documents has been implemented and preserved by Contractor(s). On the other hand, ENGINEER shall not, during such visits or as a result of such observations of Contractor(s)' work in progress, supervise, direct, or have control over Contractor(s)' work, nor shall ENGINEER have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for the Contractor(s)' means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected by Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their work. Accordingly, ENGINEER can neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume responsibility for Contractor(s)' failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2.5.2.4. If ENGINEER observes or otherwise becomes aware of defects or deficiencies in the work, or nonconformance to the Contract Documents, ENGINEER shall promptly give written notice thereof to OWNER. 2.5.3. Defective Work. During such visits and on the basis of such observation, ENGINEER may disapprove of or reject Contractor(s) work while it is in progress if ENGINEER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents. 2.5.4. Interpretations and Clarifications. ENGINEER shall issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare work directive changes and change orders as required for OWNER'S approval. 2.5.5. Shop Drawings. ENGINEER shall review and approve (or take other appropriate action in respect of) Shop Drawings, samples and other data which Contractor(s) are required to submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action shall not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. 2.5.6. Substitutes. ENGINEER shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s). 2.5.7. Inspections and Tests. ENGINEER shall have authority, as OWNER'S representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work by Contrictoi, and shall receive and review all certificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their Doc. 4170480v.2 50d and France Improvements RNK: 6/12/2013 Page 5 August 16; 2013 OWNER and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid. 2.5.10. Contractor(s)' Completion Documents. ENGINEER shall receive and review maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of insurance, tests and approvals which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract Documents (but such review will only be to determine that their content complies with the requirements of, and in the case of certificates on inspection, tests and approvals the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents); and shall transmit them to OWNER with written comments. 2.5.11. Inspections. ENGINEER shall conduct an inspection to determine if the work is substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the completed work is acceptable so that ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, final payment to Contractor(s) and give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such recommendation and notice will be subject to the limitations expressed in paragraph 2.5.5. 2.5.12. Limitation of Responsibilities. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any Contractor, or of any subcontractor or supplier, or any of the Contractor(s)' or subcontractors' or suppliers' agents or employees of any other persons (except ENGINEER'S own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise furnishing or performing any of the Contractor(s)' work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 2.5.1 through 2.5.12 inclusive, shall be construed to release ENGINEER from liability for failure to properly perform duties and responsibilities assumed by ENGINEER in the Contract Documents. 2.6 OPERATIONAL PHASE 2.6.1. Provide assistance in the closing of any financial or related transaction for the Project. 2.6.2. Provide assistance in connection with the refining and adjusting of any equipment or system. 2.6.3. Assist OWNER in training OWNER'S staff to operate and maintain the Project. Extensive training shall be mutually agreed upon within the Supplemental Agreement as Additional Services as defined in Section 3 of this agreement. 2.6.4. Assist OWNER in developing systems and procedures for control of the operation and maintenance of and record keeping for the Project. 2.6.5. Within ninety (90) days after completion of a Project, prepare a set of reproducible record prints of Drawings and an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record Drawing requirements, attached hereto, showing those changes made during the construction process, based on the marked -up prints, drawings and other data furnished by Contractor(s) to ENGINEER and which ENGINEER considered significant. ENGINEER will not be responsible for any errors or omissions in the information provided by Contractor that is incorporated in the record drawings and Doc. 4170480v.2 50 and France Improvements RNK: 6/12/2013 Page 7 August 16, 2013 licensing; assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing; detailed quantity surveys of material, equipment and labor; and audits or inventories required in connection with construction performed by OWNER. 3.1.7. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than Basic Services (which include, but are not limited to, customary civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering and customary architectural design incidental thereto); and providing data or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 when OWNER employs ENGINEER to provide such data or services in lieu of furnishing the same in accordance with paragraph 4.4. 3.1.8. Services during out -of -town travel required of ENGINEER other than visits to the site or OWNER'S office. 3.1.9. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except when such assistance is required to complete services called for in paragraph 2.4. 3.1.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals to supplement Basic Services under paragraph 2.5.10. 3.1.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for OWNER in any litigation, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project unless the ENGINEER is a defendant (except for assistance in consultations which is included as part of Basic Services. 3.1.12. Additional services in connection with the Project, including services which are to be furnished by OWNER in accordance with Section 4, and services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement. 3.2 SERVICES NOT REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. When required by the Contract Documents in circumstances beyond ENGINEER'S control, ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others, as circumstances require during construction and without waiting for specific authorization from OWNER, Additional Services listed in paragraphs 3.2.1 through 3.2.5, inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement. ENGINEER shall advise OWNER promptly after starting any such additional services which will be paid for by OWNER. 3.2.1. Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect changes requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic Services is not commensurate with the additional services rendered. 3.2.2. Services in making revisions to Plans and Specifications occasioned by the acceptance of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); and services after the award to each contract in evaluating and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable or excessive number of substitutions proposed by Contractor. Doc. 417048ov.2 50'h and France Improvements RNK: 6/12/2013 Page 9 August 16; 2013 4.5 Provide engineering surveys or authorize ENGINEER to establish reference points for construction to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with the layout of the work. 4.6 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public and private property as required for ENGINEER to perform services under this Agreement. 4.7 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, Drawings, Specifications, proposals and other documents presented by ENGINEER. Obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of ENGINEER. 4.8 Prepare applications and provide support for approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Project. 4.9 Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER may require or ENGINEER may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be raised by Contractor(s), such auditing service as OWNER may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid under the construction contract, and such inspection services as OWNER may require to ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule, regulations, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. 4.10 If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER at the site who is not ENGINEER or ENGINEER'S agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such other person and the affect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER and the Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be set forth in a supplemental agreement. 4.11 If more than one prime contract is to be awarded for construction, materials, equipment and services for the entire Project, designate a person or organization to have authority and responsibility for coordinating the activities among the various prime contractors. 4.12 Furnish to ENGINEER data or estimated figures as to OWNER'S anticipated costs for services to be provided by others for OWNER so that ENGINEER may make the necessary findings to support opinions of probable Total Project Costs. 4.13 Attend the pre -bid meeting, bid opening, pre - construction meetings, construction progress and other job related meetings and substantial completion inspections and final payment inspections. 4.14 Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope of timing of ENGINEER'S services, or any defect or nonconformance in the work of any Contractor. 4.15 Furnish, or direct ENGINEER to provide, Additional Services as stipulated in paragraph 3.1 of this Agreement or other services as required. Doc. 4170480x.2 501h and France Improvements RNK: 6/12/2013 Page 11 August 16; 2013 5.7 The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the first prime contract to be executed for the work of the Project or any part thereof, and will terminate upon written recommendation by ENGINEER of final payment on the last prime contract to be completed. Construction Phase services may be rendered at different times in respect of separate prime contracts if the Project involves more than one prime contract. 5.8 The Operational Phase will commence during the Construction Phase and will terminate upon the last 'of the following events: (1) one year after the date of Substantial Completion, as defined in the Contract Documents, if the last prime contract for construction, materials and equipment on which substantial completion is achieved; (2) after final payment to the Contractor(s); (3) after all known issues have been satisfactorily resolved. . 5.9 If OWNER requests significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project, the time of performance of ENGINEER'S services shall be adjusted equitably. 5.10 OWNER shall give prompt authorization to proceed or not proceed with any phase of services after completion of the immediately preceding phase. 5.11 In the event that the work designed or specified by ENGINEER is to be furnished or performed under more than one prime contract, or if ENGINEER'S services are to be separately sequenced with the work of one or more prime contractors (such as in the case of fast - tracking), OWNER and ENGINEER shall, prior to commencement of the Final Design Phase, develop a schedule for performance of ENGINEER'S services during the Final Design, Bidding or Negotiating and Construction Phases in order to sequence and coordinate properly such services as are applicable to the work under such separate contracts. 6. PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER 6.1 PAYMENT. For Project services, ENGINEER will be paid in accordance with the Supplemental Agreement between the parties for the Project. 6.2 OTHER PROVISIONS CONCERNING PAYMENTS. 6.2.1. If OWNER fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and expenses within thirty five (35) days after receipt of ENGINEER'S statement therefor, the amounts due ENGINEER will be increased at the rate of one -half percent (1/2 %) per month from said thirtieth day, and in addition, ENGINEER may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges. 6.2.2. In the event of termination by OWNER under paragraph 8.1 upon the completion of any phase of the Basic Services, progress payments due ENGINEER for services rendered through such phase shall constitute total payment for such services. In the event of such termination by OWNER during any phase of the Basic Services, ENGINEER will be paid for services actually and necessarily rendered during that phase by ENGINEER'S principals and employees engaged directly Doc. 4170480v.2 50`x' and France Improvements RNK: 6/12/2013 Page 13 August 16, 2013 that Engineer or any of Engineer's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Engineer shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Engineer's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self - employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 8.2 TERMINATION. OWNER may terminate this Agreement and any Supplemental Agreement without cause by written notice delivered to the ENGINEER. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the OWNER terminates the Agreement because the ENGINEER has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the ENGINEER, and the OWNER may retain another contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in the Contract Documents. If as a result, the OWNER incurs total costs for the work (including payments to both the present contractor and a future contractor) which exceed the not to exceed amount specified in the Contract Documents, if any, then the ENGINEER shall be responsible for the difference between the cost actually incurred and the Agreement amount. 8.3 DOCUMENTS. All documents including Plans and Specifications prepared or furnished by ENGINEER (and ENGINEER'S independent professional associates and consultants) pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project and the OWNER will be provided with information and reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the Project by OWNER and others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by OWNER or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by ENGINEER for the specific purpose intended will be at OWNER'S sole risk. If the OWNER or ENGINEER terminates this Agreement, copies of all files, records, and drawings in ENGINEER'S possession relating to service performance for OWNER shall be turned over to OWNER without cost to OWNER. 8.4 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. The ENGINEER must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement. The ENGINEER is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event the ENGINEER receives a request to release data, the ENGINEER must immediately notify the OWNER. The OWNER will give the ENGINEER instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released and the ENGINEER will be reimbursed as Additional Public Improvement Services by OWNER under Paragraph 3.1for ENGINEER'S reasonable costs in complying with a request to release data. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the OWNER, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from ENGINEER'S officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. Doc. #I 70480v.2 50'h and France Improvements RNK: 6/12/2013 Page 15 August 16, 2013 writing. OWNER shall not be responsible for , discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of ENGINEER'S services.. 8.8 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER. 8.9 CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this contract shall be venued in the Hennepin County District Court. 8.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 8.10.1. OWNER and ENGINEER each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and ENGINEER are hereby bound to the other party, to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements, and obligations of this Agreement. 8.10.2. Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due) this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent professional associates and consultants as ENGINEER may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 8.10.3. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the OWNER and ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party. 8.11 PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1' /� percent per month or any part of the month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 8.12 COPYRIGHT/PATENT INFRINGEMENT. ENGINEER shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, Doc. 4170480v.2 5& and France Improvements RNK: 6/12!2013 Page 17 August 16, 2013 ®l Kimley -Horn _— and Associates. Inc. August 16, 2013 Mr. Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Parking and Wayfinding Feasibility Study Services 50`h & France District - Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services Dear Mr. Neuendorf: Thank you for selecting the Kimley -Horn team to work with you to deliver parking and wayfinding improvements in the 50`b & France District. Our project understanding, scope of services, schedule, and fee are detailed below. Project Understanding The City of Edina is moving forward with a parking and wayfinding project in the 50ffi & France District with the following objectives; • Provide 150 — 200 additional parking spaces • Improve parking ramp accessibility, safety and appearance • Provide a parking wayfinding system that informs motorists of the location of available parking • Evaluate parking policy and make recommendations that address the parking needs of both customers and employees • Evaluate the feasibility of including commercial / retail space within parking ramp expansions and potentially on the city surface parking lot (Clancy's lot). • City -owned property at 3930 West 49 '/z Street (formerly Edina Realty). • Property located at 3944 West 49 '/2 Street (Hooten's Cleaners) in the process of being acquired by the City. • Identification of repairs to South, Middle and North ramps • Identification of streetscape improvements to enhance wayfinding and the customer experience We understand that the improvements will be funded by special assessments of the benefitting properties. 2. One joint meeting with PMT and PAT to develop guiding principles. Assumes attendance by up to 3 KHA team members. E. Parking Management Best Practices Presentation 1. Kimley -Horn will present "90 Parking Best Practices in 90 Minutes" to the PMT and PAT to provide a common point of reference for thinking about strategies that may be appropriate for the 50t' & France District. 2. One joint meeting with the PMT and PAT for Parking Management Best Practices presentation. F. Solicit Input on Alternatives via Small Group Meetings 1. Invite property owners and tenants to small group meetings to obtain input on the alternatives developed in Task 6. Small groups will consist of 10 to 12 members, from the same geographic area. Property owners will be encouraged to invite their tenants to attend these meetings. Up to 15 small group meetings are included in the scope of work. Assumes attendance by up to 2 KHA team members. G. Public Open House to Present Preferred Alternative 1. Based on the input from the small group meetings, and meetings with PMT and PAT to determine the preferred alternative, we will schedule and lead an open house format public meeting to display the preferred alternative. 2. Comment cards will be made available to obtain initial public impression about issues and opportunities. H. Public Hearing for Improvements 1. In accordance with Minn. Statute 429 an improvement hearing will be held by the City Council. 2. Assumes attendance by up to 3 KHA team members. 1. Public Hearing for Assessments 1. In accordance with Minn. Statue 429 an assessment hearing will be held by the City Council. 2. Assumes attendance by up to 3 KHA team members. Owner to Provide: Ramp Plans, 5e & France district plan in AutoCAD with topography, survey information, previous relevant reports; City will also provide iveb- hosting services for project - related materials Deliverables: Meeting minutes and supporting graphics 2. Wayfinding and Parking Management Services consist of the following tasks: A. Initial Parkinp- Plan Review 1. Review initial parking supply /demand assumptions and plans. a. Identify the needs of each defined user group. b. Perform a customer survey to gather information on customer parking preferences, perception of existing parking facilities and acceptance of possible parking management strategies. The survey will be face -to -face interviews with random samples of customers departing the North, Middle and South ramps. Develop a business card style handout with information for respondents to take an on- line version of the survey if they opt not to stop for the face -to -face interview. Survey duration will be a total of 4 two -hour periods for a total of eight survey hours during one week. Survey time periods will generally consist of a weekday morning, lunch and evening and • Policies and procedures development • Communications and protocols • Payment systems and validation programs ❑ Special event parking. ❑ Fee structures in relation to market conditions. ❑ Transient self - parking • Uncontrolled parking • Traditional cashiered exit • Validation programs • Pay -on -foot • Central Cashier • Pay by Space • Pay -by -Cell Phone • Credit Card in/out ❑ Transient valet parking • Traditional valet • Valet stack ❑ Employee parking • Traditional card access /nested parking • Tied into larger building security system • Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI)I • Off -site parking ❑ Residential parking • Segregated parking areas for residential • Secured/segregated parking areas • Valet parking for residential b. Review and recommend parking management and enforcement strategies to help ensure user groups park appropriately. c. Provide recommendations on effectively communicating parking policies to tenants. d. Recommend any additional management strategies that will improve parking conditions. ❑ Provide a copy of "Parking Management Best Practices" ❑ Review this with the PMT and PAT and identify concepts that are desired for this project. Meeting is covered in Task I.E. e. Provide recommendations to enhance operational flexibility and improve parking operations and traffic flow. f. Provide recommendations to improve parking related signage and wayfinding. C. Identify Equipment/Technology Options. 1. Present to the PMT and PAT the latest parking management technologies. Meeting is covered in Task I.E. 2. After discussion with the PMT and PAT, recommend specific equipment/technology applications a. Detail the exact location and function of all components of the revenue and access control system for the parking decks /lots. b. Provide equipment specifications for bidding and pricing. Owner to Provide: Previous parking studies (i f applicable), history of parking management strategies previously attempted, existing parking management policies and procedures. Deliverables: Existing streetscape and district signage photographic inventory and summary memorandum; up to four total alternative streetscape concepts related to parking ramp configurations; a streetscape concept for the median at Halifax and 49- 1/2; up to two concepts for parking wayf nding signs; up to three alternative concept plans for Clancy's lot. 4. Parking Ramp / Commercial Expansion Services consist of the following tasks: B. Existing Conditions Review 1. Review existing plans and other available documents for the South, Middle and North Parking Ramps. 2. Perform a field review of the existing South, Middle and North Parking Ramps. This review will focus on functional aspects of the ramps. A condition assessment review is included in Task 5. C. Zoning and Design Standards Assessment 1. Review Zoning Code and relevant Design Standards as they apply to ramp expansion and city surface lot development. Summarize review which will be used in conjunction with the Preliminary Building Code Analysis in formulating options for expansion and improvements. D. Preliminary Building Code Anal 1. Evaluate existing parking structures with Building Official to determine outstanding code deficiencies. 2. Review MNSBC to determine code parameters for rehabilitation and expansion projects E. North Parking Ramp East Expansion Options 1. Conceptual design for four options for the expansion of the North Parking Ramp to the east onto the former Edina Realty building property. One option would have three levels of parking and another with four levels of parking. The other concepts would incorporate retail/coinmercial space on the first level for both a three level expansion and a four level expansion. F. North Parking Ramp West Expansion Options 1. Conceptual design for two options for the expansion of the North Parking Ramp to the west onto the Hooten Cleaners site. Each option would provide three levels. One of the options would incorporate retail /commercial space on the first level, with the potential for storage in a lower level. G. South Parking Ramp Stairs. Elevator and Lightin 1. Conceptual design for reconstruction of the northeast and center stair cores of the South Parking Ramp. The reconstruction of the northeast stair core would include the incorporation of an elevator. 2. Evaluation of the existing light system and recommendations for possible upgrades H. Middle Parking Ramp Stairs. Elevator and Lighting 1. Conceptual design for a new stair /elevator core on the south side of the Middle Parking Ramp. 2. Evaluation of the existing light system and recommendations for possible upgrades. I. Visualizations 1. Prepare background plans, elevations, 3D model, photographs and other visualizations to support engagement process and alternatives analysis. 7. Feasibility Report We will prepare a feasibility report for the project based on the preferred alternative and input received from City staff and the City Council. The feasibility report will incorporate relevant portions of the April 2012 "Feasibility Report Middle and South Ramp 50'b and France Parking Ramp Expansion." The feasibility report will include the following: A. Existing Conditions Information 1. Obtain topographic survey for the extents of the preferred alternative. 2. Obtain geotechnical information to determine soil support values for the parking ramp and commercial expansions as well as any new pavement. 3. Obtain environmental testing information for any sites that are potential sources of contamination within the extents of the preferred alternative. B. Proposed Improvements 1. A description of the proposed wayfinding, streetscape, urban design, parking management, parking ramp / commercial expansion, parking ramp rehabilitation improvements included as a part of the project. C. Right- of- Way/Easement Requirements 1. Any necessary right -of -way /easement requirements for the proposed improvements will be identified. At this time, it is assumed that no right -of- way or easement acquisition will be needed. D. Estimated Costs 1. Estimated costs for the various improvements will be provided. E. Proposed Financing Plan 1. The proposed financing plan for the improvements will be identified. F. Project Schedule 1. A proposed schedule for the implementation of the improvements will be provided. G. Final Report 1. Upon completion, we will provide copies of the feasibility report to City staff and the City Council. We have assumed that we will provide up to twelve (12) copies of the report and one electronic (pdf) file copy. We have assumed that the Feasibility Report will be presented to City Council at the same meeting as the Improvement Hearing (Task 1.H). Owner to Provide: Property ownership rolls Deliverables: Single doewnent with executive summary, alternatives and appendix 8. Design 2013 Parking Ramp Rehabilitation Projects We will prepare a set of plans and specifications for first phase of rehabilitation for the Middle Ramp. The intention is to have the work completed in 2013. Repairs to the South & North Ramp are anticipated to occur in 2014. The services will consist of the following: A. Meeting with the PMT and PAT to review staging of the repairs B. Issue bidding or construction documents depending on the procurement method. C. Review bids received and make recommendation for award. D. Periodic review of work performed by the contractor. E. Review contractor submittals including product data, shop drawings and payment applications. Fee and Billing Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. will provide the services described in the scope of services on a labor fee plus expense basis not to exceed Two Hundred Sixty Thoursand dollars ($260,000). Labor fee will be billed according to the attached hourly rate schedule. An amount will be added to each invoice to cover certain other expenses such as in -house duplicating, local mileage, postage, and delivery charges. The total estimated fees and expenses for the work tasks included in this Agreement is: 1. Stakeholder Engagement $ 32,000 2. Wayfinding and Parking Management $ 45,000 3. Streetscape / Urban Design $ 20,000 4. Parking Ramp / Commercial Expansion $ 65,000 5. Identify Parking Ramp Rehabilitation Projects $ 22,000 6. Alternatives Analysis $ 7,000 7. Feasibility Report $ 22,000 8. Design 2013 Parking Ramp Rehabilitation Projects $ 15,000 9. Design 2013 Parking Ramp Lighting Improvements $ 17,000 Reimbursable Expenses $ 15,000 TOTAL $260,000 Fees will be invoiced monthly based on the actual amount of service performed and expenses incurred. Payment will be due within 35 days of the date of the invoice. In addition to the matters set forth herein, our Agreement shall include and be subject to, and only to, the terms and conditions of the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Service between the City and Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc.dated August 16, 2013, except that sections 2.4 through 2.6 are deleted and sections 2.2 and 2.3 apply only to Tasks 8 and 9. If you concur in all the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the services, please have authorized persons execute both copies of this Agreement in the spaces provided below, retain one copy, and return the other to us. Fees and times stated in this Agreement are valid for sixty (60) days after the date of this letter. We appreciate this opportunity to continue our services to the City of Edina. Please contact me at 651- 643 -0446 if you have any questions. Sincerely, KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Jon B. Horn, P.E. Project Manager Vice President Attachment: Hourly Rate Schedule Copy: File 11 City of Edina Parking and Wayfinding Feasibility Study 50th & France District Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Schedule of Rates Effective January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 Classification Hourly Rate Administrative Assistant $ 82.50 CARD Technician $ 90.00 Clerical $ 70.00 Client Manager $190.00 Drafter $ 64.00 Field Technician I $102.50 Field Technician 11 $110.00 Graduate Eng. /Planner I $102.50 Graduate Eng. /Planner 11 $112.50 Principal $195.00 Project Engineer/Planner $120.00 Project Manager $145.00 Senior Administrative Assistant $100.00 Senior CADD Technician $100.00 Senior Designer $120.00 Senior Field Technician $125.00 Senior Project Manager $165.00 Reimbursable expenses (copy /printing charges, plotting, mileage, delivery charges, faxes, etc.) will be charged as an office expense at 6.0% of the labor fee. Additional rates may be negotiated at a later date for classifications or services not included above. To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: August 20, 2013 o e� " • !�CORPOFT`�FJ • lase Agenda Item #: V. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Subject: Emergency Preparedness Action Requested: Information / Background: This will be a presentation. There is no packet data City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 ow e ^'roRPOSU+�° ,aaa To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.A. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 20, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Final Rezoning to PUD, Final Development Plan and Final Plat. Vernon Avenue Housing. 5109 -5125 West 49th Street, Resolution No. 2013 -64, Ordinance No. 2013 -8 Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. Information / Background: Hunt Associates are requesting final review of the redevelopment of three lots located at 5109 -5125 West 49th Street. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two apartments and single family home on the site (10 units total) and build a new 16 -unit attached housing development. (See narrative and plans on pages A22 —A45 in the Planning Commission staff report.) The subject properties total 1.43 acres in size; therefore, the proposed density of the project would be I I units per acre. The applicant received preliminary rezoning and plan approval of this project on April 16, 2013. (See approved plans, Planning Commission and City Council minutes on pages A7 —A21.) The existing property is zoned PRD -2, Planned Residential District -2, which allows residential building containing six or fewer dwelling units. The existing apartments contain four and five units each. The applicant is seeking final rezoning of the property to PUD, Planned Unit Development. On April 16th, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to guide the site MDR, Medium Density Residential to allow a density of 5 -12 units per acre. In order to obtain to approvals for the project, the following is the final step required for approval: I . Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to PUD, 2. .Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD, and 3. Final Plat The proposed plans are consistent with the plans that were recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council; including reducing the density by eliminating one unit and reducing the height from four stories to three. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 Planning Commission Recommendation: On July 24, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposed project. (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2013 -64 • Ordinance No. 2013 -8 • Draft minutes from the July 24, 2013 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, July 24, 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-64 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM PRD -2, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO PUD -5, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -5, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & FINAL PLAT AT 5109 -5125 WEST 49TH STREET FOR HUNT ASSOCIATES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Hunt Associates is requesting redevelopment of three lots, 5109 -5125 West 49th Street. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two apartments and single family home on the site (10 units total) and build a new 16 -unit attached housing development. The subject properties total 1.43 acres in size; therefore, the proposed density of the project would be 11 units per acre. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Legal Descriptions 1.03 On July 24, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan for the site. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which contemplates medium density housing for the site. 3. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today it is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan turns and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of two - story townhomes. 5. Parking areas and garages are internal to the site, and not visible from 49th street or Vernon Avenue. 6. The project would enhance pedestrian connections. The plan provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 49th to Vernon, that would connect, not only this CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-64 Page Two 7. Landscaping would be enhanced. Extensive Landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. The number of over story trees is over double the number required by City Code. The mature trees along Vernon Avenue would be preserved. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning to PUD -5, Planned Unit Development -5, Final Development Plan, and Final Plat subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Utility plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped June 24, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one -year after City Council approval. If the plat is not filed it shall be deemed null and void. 6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. The park dedication fees are due prior to release of the final plat. 8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated July 19, 2013. 9. Compliance with the fire marshal recommendation in his email dated July 12, 2013. 10. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-64 Page Two 11. The Park Dedication fee of $35,000 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. 12. There shall be no rooftop decks. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 20, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 20, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk Exhibit A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, File No. 152183, dated October 31, 2011. and File No. 153093, dated October 5, 2012) Lot 3, 4, 5 and 6, and all that part of Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12 lying North of State Highway No. 5, Block 4, " Tingdale bros., Brookside', Except that part of Lot 12 which lies Southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 12 distant 35 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence run Southwesterly to the Southwest comer of the above described Lot 12 and there terminating Together with: A 25.00 foot wide strip of land lying east of the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad between West 49th Street and Vernon Avenue in Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Torrens Property, Certificate Number. 577550 And: Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Tingdale Bros: Brookside, Except that part of said Lot 8 described as follows: I Beginning at a point on the East boundary of said Lot 8 distant 28 feet North of the Southeast comer thereof; thence South along said East boundary 28 feet; thence West along the South boundary of said Lot, 50 feet; thence North along the West boundary of said Lot, 12 feet; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, including any part or portion of any street or alley adjacent to said premises vacated or to be vacated, Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract 91 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 5109 -5125 WEST 49th STREET (Vernon Townhomes) The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD); Subd. 4. Planned Unit Development District -5 (PUD -5) — 5109 -5125 West 49th, Street (Vernon Townhomes) A. Legal Description: See attached B. Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re development plans received by the City on June 24, 2013, except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2013 -64, on file in the Office of the Planning Department under file number 2013- 005.13a `C. Principal Uses: Residential buildings_ containing six or fewer units.. D. Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District' Signs allowed pe r the Planned Residential District.; E. Conditional Uses:; None Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX 1F. Development Standards. Development standards per the PRD -2 Zoning_ District,_ except the_following: Buildinq Setbacks' 'Front — 4 9th Street 35 feet —structure 18 feet — stair /deck/patio Front — Vernon 7 feet` Side — East 15 & 42 feet !Rear — South 15 feet Building Height 2 -1/2 stories or 35.5 feet Building Coverage - 26 % Parking Stalls (Residential) 2 enclosed stalls per unit Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor a Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 20, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X- Added text —XXXX Exhibit A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, File No. 152183, dated October 31, 2011. and File No. 153093, dated October 5, 2012) Lot 3, 4, 5 and 6, and all that part of Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12 lying North of State Highway No. 5, Block 4, "ringdale Bros: Brookside ", Except that part of Lot 12 which lies Southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 12 distant 35 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence run Southwesterly to the Southwest comer of the above described Lot 12 and there terminating Together with: A 25.00 foot wide strip of land lying east of the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad between West 49th Street and Vernon Avenue in Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Torrens Property, Certificate Number. 577550 And: Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Tingdale Bros: Brookside, Except that part of said Lot 8 described as follows: I Beginning at a point on the East boundary of said Lot 8 distant 28 feet North of the Southeast comer thereof; thence South along said East boundary 28 feet; thence West along the South boundary of said . Lot, 50 feet; thence North along the West boundary of said Lot, 12 feet; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, including any part or portion of any street or alley adjacent to said premises vacated or to be vacated, Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract , v Commissioner Carpenter stated he too feels the proposed subdivision is sensitive to the environment; however, he is somewhat concerned with the sight lines at t corner as expressed by Ms. Rocheford. Carpenter stated he wants assurapces that house placemen land topography are carefully assessed to ensure clear view in maintained. Commissioner Platteter commented th he likes how thYas developer is working with the land, adding in his opinion the shared driveway is a great tion. If don depicted it should create a good plat. Commissioner Carr stated she has no addition% comm Commissioner Forrest commented that it may be s ble this site is one lot because of the terrain. She also expressed concern that any redevelopment of t slot would impact the urban canopy. Forrest encouraged the builder to be in contact with then gh ors during the construction process. Chair Staunton said he had an initial concern wit he req st because of the magnitude of the lot area variance; however, understands differing neigh rhoods ca lay a role in "skewing" the numbers. Staunton stated he also has a strong preferenc for the drivew access to remain off Tracy Avenue as indicated on the plans. He further suggested a possibility of Ii Ring parking to one side of the street to ensure greater visibility. Motion Commissioner Potts moved to recomm d preliminary plat approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff condition Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 7 -0. B. Final Rezoning, Final Plat and Final Development. Edina Fifty Five, LLC. 5109 -5125 49th Street West. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission Hunt Associates are requesting final review of the redevelopment of three lots located at 5109 -5125 West 49th Street. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two apartments and single family home on the site) and build a new 16 -unit attached housing development. The subject properties total 1.43 acres in size; therefore, the proposed density of the project would be 11 units per acre. Continuing, Aaker noted the applicant received preliminary rezoning and plan approval of this project on April 16, 2013. Aaker reported in order to obtain to approvals for the project, the following is the final step required for approval; Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to PUD and Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. Page 5 of 15 The proposed plans are consistent with the plans that were recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council; including reducing the density by eliminating one unit and reducing the height from four stories to three. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PRD -2, Planned Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, Final Development and Final Plat to plat and build 16 new townhomes on the subject 1.43 acre parcel subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan for the site. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plank .WhJch contemplates medium density housing for the site. 3. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision'6,. 4in n e Ye uirements. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient an'd creative use of \6 property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today i,tris`ciearly the back of thesite; and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan turns and faces, Vernon Avenue with a ro O,f two -story townhomes. 5. Parking areas and garages are internal to the site aa 'nd not visible from 491" s�'reet or Vernon Avenue. \ \ 6. The project would enhance pedestrian connections. The .plart provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 491" to Vernon; that`woul .connect,n t on y this development, but the entire area to the - north to the Gran&iew District., 7. Landscaping would be enhanced. Extensive. Landsca'pmg isproposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. The number of over story trees is over double the numb'er`required.by City Code. TheIMature trees along Vernon Avenue would be .. preserved: Approval is also subject to the.following Conditions 1. Subject to staff approval,,the she,'must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the follo ing plans 'unless modified by the conditions below: • _' Site plan 'date stamped June 24, 2013. • Grading,plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Utility `plari` date stamped June 24, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 24, 2013. Building elevations date stamped June 24, 2013. Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. Page 6 of 15 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one -year after City Council approval. If the plat is not filed it shall be deemed null and void. 6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. The park dedication fees are due prior to release of the final plat. 8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineepin his memo dated July 19, 2013. 9. Compliance with the fire marshal recommendation irfhis•'email dated July 12, 2013. Appearing for the Applicant Chris Palkowitsch, BKV Group and D. Hunt, Hunt Discussion Commissioner Car stated she was very happy to see th4t the uni`cunt and buildirg F eiight was reduced. Carr asked which unit was r owed. Mr. Palkowitsch responded that the NUunit was eliminated. Applicant Presentation Mr. Palkowitsch add ressed'the`Comrnission and 6plainedktliey`( stoned to both the Planning Commission and City Council suggest o'hs before Submitting their final plans. As previously mentioned a unit was eliminated, buil`ding,height W,5s, reduced, aid the units along Vernon Avenue were pulled back. Also eliminated as per Commission and Council requd`sts were the roof top deck options. The units along: Vernon Avenue includes - buffer but continue to have presence on Vernon Avenue. Palkowitsch said one of the key elements of the improvements b.the site is how the site is connected to greater Edina for both pedestrians;and bikes. Th6 proposed connection to Vernon increases access for the entire neighborhood.'' Align is also proposed identifying the development. Continuing, Palkowitsch ;said sustainability goals include retaining as much of the mature vegetation and trees as possible, including; a goo'd`vegetative buffer from the surrounding traffic for those homes on Vernon Avenue. Palkowitsch:said building materials have been changed from wood to stone and fiber cement with stucco to match the stone. Concluding, Palkowitsch said they accept the recommendations from the City Engineer; however are opposed to the request for a 5 -foot grass area between the roadway and sidewalk on Vernon Avenue. Discussion Commissioner Forrest commented that she appreciates the attention paid to the existing vegetation; Page 7 of 15 however, wishes there was a tree survey that better identifies what's there and what will be added. Commissioner Potts stated that he isn't sure how he feels about the proposed monument sign in a residential neighborhood. Mr. Palkowitsch reported ordinance allows 24 square foot identification sign. Commissioner Platteter said his concern is how the neighborhood would be impacted during the construction process. He added he wants the project to be policed per the new ordinance 411. Planner Aaker responded 411 pertain to single and double dwelling units. Platteter acknowledged that fact; however pointed out the residential homes across the street would be greatly impacted as a result of this redevelopment. Commissioner Carr commented that she tends to agree with;Engineer Houle's recommendation of a boulevard style sidewalk for the units facing Vernon Avenue :Commissioner Forrest agreed, adding the intent is to develop sidewalks away from the roads; it's safer. Commissioner Platteter stated he too agrees with Houle on providing some boulevard area; however, without a plan to view it's difficult to comment on. Platteter said he's not sure there is;adequate spacing to accommodate that boulevard while retaining yard space for the units. 4 A discussion ensued on the recommendation from Engineer Houle regarding providing p- boulevard along Vernon Avenue. Commissionerseexpressed the opinion.that they agreed with Houle's comments initially; however, because of the future possibility -of realigning the exit ramp and to continue to provide adequate spacing for the Vernon Avenue units it's difficult'to.make an educated guess on if this boulevard request would work- as,requested'by.;Houle; or._ift :n.eeds some form oftweaking to ensure the units on Vern on,Avenue remain viable:, Mr. Hunt expressed the opinion thatmoving the units ;back from Vernon Avenue would be difficult because the site was designed with what exists, pointing out the real possibility that in the future the exit ramp could be, reconfigured. Corhmist.ioner.Plattetee,agreed they don't have adequate information on potential,-' : rodway chan es and requirements Commissio er Carr asked Planner Aaker if the City requires the requested boulevard area. Planner Aaker said at this time it isn't a reduirement;'however the City is going in that direction as mentioned by Commissioner Forrest. Chair Staunton noted:tl e;,change per Fire Marshall on the drive aisle width from 18 -feet to 20 -feet and questioned if that would be`a problem. Mr. Palkowitsch responded at this time they are working with the Fire Marshall on that requirement. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Hearine Mary Hartupee, 5016 Edenbrook Lane, pointed out Vernon Avenue is a very busy street and trying to maintain green boulevard space would be difficult. She pointed out the requested 5 -foot boulevard would also be difficult to maintain because of the high volume of traffic and materials used by the street crew during winter weather. Hartupee thanked the developers for fine tuning this project; adding it's a better project than before. Hartupee also suggested erecting a stop sign for those exiting Page 8 of 15 the development. Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the project; being none Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Continued Discussion Commissioner Forrest said the goal of the PUD process is to find solutions for both sides; adding she believes this project is superior to what was originally presented. Forrest said she is also in favor of Engineer Houle's requirements including the boulevard along Vern'oAvenue; but isn't sure in what form that boulevard should be. Forrest acknowledged the juggling;act between privacy vs. engagement for the Vernon Avenue units. Chair Staunton said he understands the request for thd,buffer along Verno venue; acknowledging it does create a change in plans for the Vernon Avenue` noting, the ides of the buffer is to provide more safety for pedestrians. Continuing, Staunton reiterated the requested ch \'ange to boulevard along Vernon may be an issue that needs further review. He�uggested a,6 -foot sideW "IK c�oser to the street be looked at; however, on this point he isn't sure. St au, on said;hfe;`agrees with Hoy\ \le`:on storm water �o\ �:;:;•:\ retention and the Fire Marshall on drive: aisle width. Stare ton;commented he was unsure about a stop sign exiting the site. _ ?...;; ,Y �i; Mr. Hunt said if the Commission really objeefs` proposed sign not only identifies the develops; Commissioner Forrest sa►.d.;this'development w '•..fir; Commissioner Potts sai' %'Khis opini is pro simple sidewalk and bike 'Walkway is great ar emonument sigri.t will not be built. Hunt said the but`fe ped;.screen \mechanical box equipment. be .a ve.rynicewelcome to the neighborhood. sitive for the neighborhood. The additions of a access Vernon Avenue. Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Final Development and Final Rezoning to PUD and a zoning ordinance amendment establishirig.the PUD subject to staff conditions (all staff) and the additional condition that this project be reviewed under Ordinance 411; the-Residential Construction \ \%\\ \, `. i , Maintenance Plan ;`citing the residential nature directly across the road. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion„\�,, :? A brief discussion ensued 6i�lhe?sidewal'k /boulevard area on Vernon Avenue. It was recommended that the applicants address the request from the City Engineer and negotiate with Council if this request won't work. It was further suggested that if revised they buffer as much as possible using the existing grade to provide the Vernon Avenue units with enough yard /patio space. Commissioners observed without graphics it was difficult to envision the area with the recommended boulevard. The discussion also acknowledged that in the future the public right of way will change along with the potential for realignment of the exit ramp. It was further noted that the traffic exiting Highway 100 onto Vernon will continue to require access to Interlachen Boulevard Chair Staunton said his suggestion of a 6 -foot wide sidewalk (near street) with 4 + feet of boulevard was Page 9 of 15 a compromise that may work; however as previously mentioned without seeing it it is difficult to design or envision. It was further suggested that staff conditions (all) be available for review at the Council level. Concluding, Commissioners thanked the developers for their response to their earlier comments adding in their opinion this will be a good project and possibly the first in the redevelopment of the Grandview area.. Ayes; Carpenter, Potts, Platteter, Carr, Forrest, Staunton. Motion carried. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review— Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Grou Boulevard, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission.t y'a proposal to re- develop 5801 Edina Industrial c including a drive-through.-,.Currently the buildid a hair loss treatment center; a telecommunicat' e formerly occupied bV,a builder office /showro" 1 Edina Industrial ng asked \o consider a sketch plan rd from Ace uses to retail uses he >site co `t ins a real estate office, ruching itea a small vacancy applicant; :Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group, would like to repurpose a :'dtremo the existing building with neighborhood retail services: >, Aaker explained to accommodate.th.e req` est,`the following w Id be required: 1 A Rezoning from POD, Planned <O ice District -1, to PCD -2, PI a ed Commercial District -�\ 2. A Comprehensive Guicl6 an A endment from Office to Neighbo ood Commercial Continuing, Aaker reportecl,th;at'the roperty is located just west of Highway 10 nd is located across the street from retai ses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commerc I District. Uses include a gas station, urger King, and a small retail strip center. North nd east of the site are office /light ind strial uses. The proposed use of the property woul be consistent with the existing Ian uses to the south. Aaker noted this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Page 10 of 15 o`` e �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 24, 2013 VI.B. Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description & Background Hunt Associates are requesting final- review of the redevelopment of three lots located at 5109 -5125 West 49t Street. (See property location on pages Al —A6.) The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two apartments and single family home on the site (10 units total) and build a new 16 -unit attached housing development. (See narrative and plans on pages A22 —A45.) The subject properties total 1.43 acres in size; therefore, the proposed density of the project would be 11 units per acre. The applicant received preliminary rezoning and plan approval of this project on April 16, 2013. (See approved plans, Planning Commission and City Council minutes on pages A7 —A21.) The existing property is zoned PRD -2, Planned Residential District -2, which allows residential building containing six or fewer dwelling units. The existing apartments contain four and five units each. The applicant is seeking final rezoning of the property to PUD, Planned Unit Development. On April 16th, the City Council 'also approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to guide the site MDR, Medium Density Residential to allow a density of 5 -12 units per acre. In order to obtain to approvals for the project, the following is the final step required for approval: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to PUD. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. The proposed plans are consistent with the plans that were recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council; including reducing the density by eliminating one unit and reducing the height from four stories to three. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single- family homes; zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Easterly: Single- family homes; zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Southerly: Vernon Avenue. Westerly: Railroad tracks and the Holiday gas station; Zoned and guided for Commercial use. Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.43 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains a single - family home and two townhome buildings containing nine dwelling units between the two. (See pages A3 —A6.) Planning Guide Plan designation: MDR, Medium Density Residential (4 -12 units per acre) Zoning: PRD -2, Planned Residential District -2 Access /Site Circulation Access to the site would be from 49th Street West on the north side of the site. This neighborhood is relatively isolated; there is only one roadway access point to the surrounding street system. That access is from Brookside Avenue, up to Interlachen Boulevard. (See pages Al —A2.) A public pedestrian connection would be made from the sidewalk on 49th Street through the site on the west lot line to Vernon Avenue, which would provide a pedestrian connection from this neighborhood to the GrandView area. (See pages A31 —A33.) The fire marshal has reviewed the proposed plans and is recommending that the interior drive aisles be widened to 20 feet. (See page A48.) Traffic Study As part of the Preliminary Approval and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic study, which concludes that the surrounding roadways could support the additional seven units that are proposed to be added, and no improvements are needed at adjacent 4 intersections to accommodate the proposed project. (See the study conclusions on page A46.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 25 over story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing 87 over story trees. They would include a mixture of Maple, Juniper, Spruce, Oak and Linden. (See pages A32 —A34.) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. The Landscape Plan is consistent with the preliminary plans. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be generally acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A47. A Developer's Agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks, utilities and any other public improvements. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as they are the City's review authority over the grading of the site. Building /Building Material The applicant is proposing the townhomes to be made of painted fiber' cement, architectural cast stone and stained wood panels. (See pages A26- A29a.) The buildings would have flat roofs with patios on the top that would contain a rectangular deck. Density The proposal is to develop 16 units on this 1.43 acre parcel. The project was originally proposed for 17 units; however, based on the recommendation from the Planning Commission and City Council, the applicant eliminated one unit. The proposed density of 11 units per acre . would be on the high end of the medium density residential range. However, there are already 10 units on this site, which is located on a minor arterial roadway (Vernon Avenue). Higher densities are often located on arterial roadways. Medium Density residential is often used to buffer low density residential development from commercial areas or major roadways. The proposed land use arrangement would accomplish that. 3 Final Plat The applicant is also requesting a Final Plat, called O'Brien Kimmel, to create separate lots for each of the proposed units. The Final Plat is consistent with the Preliminary Plat, with the exception of the elimination of one lot. (See the Preliminary & Final Plat on pages A30— A30a.) Park Dedication Per Minnesota State Statute..462.353, Subd. 4(a) and Section 810.13 of the City Code, the applicant is required to dedicate land for public use as parks, playgrounds, recreation facilities, trails, or public open space. Per Section 810.13. Subd. 5 of the City Code, the fee in lieu of land dedication is $5,000 per dwelling unit. The development would create 6 new dwelling units; therefore $30,000 would be required for park dedication at the time of release of the final plat. The fee would be paid prior to the City's release of the signed final plat mylars or subdivision approval for recording with Hennepin County. Future Project Expansion The proposed plans have been designed so that the proposed project could be extended to east. The internal driveway could be.extended if needed. (See page A31.) Signage Required signage for the site would be regulated in the PUD Ordinance. As proposed, the signage required would be that of the underlying PRD, Planned Residential District. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 850.04. Subd. 4 D provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD. District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: 4 a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the ,City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f, preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and L ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. As determined as part of the Preliminary Development Plan review, the proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today it is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan turns and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of two -story townhomes. (See page A28.) The plan also provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 49th to Vernon, that would connect, not only this development, but the entire area to the north to the Grandview District. Extensive landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. The number of over story trees is over double the number required by City Code. The mature trees along Vernon Avenue would be preserved. The transition of land uses is appropriate. Medium density residential is often used to buffer low density residential development from commercial areas or major roadways. The proposed land use arrangement with the proposed development on Vernon Avenue, would buffer the low density residential area to the north from Vernon Avenue and the Commercial development to the south. Proposed parking areas and garages are internal to the site, and would not be not visible from 49t street or Vernon Avenue. 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1. R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. The proposed use, townhomes containing six or fewer uses, is a permitted use in the existing zoning PRD -2 Zoning District. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: L where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Medium Density Residential - MDR," which allows 5 -12 units per acre. The proposed plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Under the current zoning, a maximum of 11 units would be allowed on the site; 10 exist today. n ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; This project would be for a single land use; however, as stated above is consistent with some of the objectives of the PUD Ordinance. iii, permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As mentioned the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the underlying PRD -2 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone this site to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and number of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. Please note that a few City Standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The site layout would be improved by engaging Vernon Avenue and providing a public pedestrian connection to Vernon Avenue and the Grandview District. The design of the buildings would be of painted fiber cement, architectural cast stone and stained wood panels (See pages A26- A29a.) 7 Compliance Table *Variances would be required Under the PRD -2 Regulations PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site. As highlighted above on pages 4 -7, the proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: 1. Create a more efficient and creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today Vernon is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan turns and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of two -story townhomes. (See page A28.) 2. The transition of land uses is appropriate. The townhome proposal would provide a nice transition of land uses between the single - family homes to the north, to Vernon Avenue and the Grandview commercial district to the south. The proposed townhome development would serve as a buffer; with a row of six townhomes facing 49th Street. 3. The proposal would be a vast improvement over the current two existing apartment buildings and single - family home on the site. City Standard Proposed (PRD -2) Front — 49th Street 30 feet 35 feet structure* 18 feet (stairs /deck/patio) Front — Vernon 30 feet 7 feet* Side — East 30 feet 15 feet* & 42 feet Side — West 30 feet 15 feet* Building Height 2 -1/2 stories or 2.5 stories & 35.6 feet* 30 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 25% 25.5 %* Density 8 units per acre (11 11 units per acre (16 units) units) Parking Stalls 2 enclosed spaces 2 enclosed spaces per unit per unit *Variances would be required Under the PRD -2 Regulations PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site. As highlighted above on pages 4 -7, the proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: 1. Create a more efficient and creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today Vernon is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan turns and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of two -story townhomes. (See page A28.) 2. The transition of land uses is appropriate. The townhome proposal would provide a nice transition of land uses between the single - family homes to the north, to Vernon Avenue and the Grandview commercial district to the south. The proposed townhome development would serve as a buffer; with a row of six townhomes facing 49th Street. 3. The proposal would be a vast improvement over the current two existing apartment buildings and single - family home on the site. 4. The proposed two /three story buildings are generally consistent with existing height in the area. 5. Provide internal parking. Parking areas and garages are internal to the site, and not visible from 49th street or Vernon Avenue. 6. Enhance pedestrian connections. The plan provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 49th to Vernon, that would connect, not only this development, but the entire area to the north to the GrandView District. 7. Enhance landscaping. Extensive landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes..The number of over story trees is over double the number required by City Code. The mature trees along Vernon Avenue would be preserved. 8. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. b. Locate and orient buildings to fit with their existing and /or planned context by framing and complementing adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. c. Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces. d. Regulate scale, massing, and height to provide complementary transitions to adjacent sites and nearby neighborhoods and areas. e. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 9. The existing roadways would support the project. Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads. (See page A46.) 10. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 6 Staff Recommendation Final Rezoning to PUD, Final Development Plan & Final Plat Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PRD -2, . Planned Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, Final Development and Final Plat to plat and build 16 new townhomes on the subject 1.43 acre parcel. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan for the site. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which contemplates medium density housing for the site. 3. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. requirements. 4. The proposal would create amore efficient and creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today it is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan turns and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of two -story townhomes. 5. Parking areas and garages are internal to the site, and not visible from 49th street or Vernon Avenue. 6. The project would enhance pedestrian connections. The plan provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 49th to Vernon, that would connect, not only this development, but the entire area to the north to the Grandview District. 7. Landscaping would be enhanced. Extensive Landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. The number of over story trees is over double the number required by City Code. The mature trees along Vernon Avenue would be preserved. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Site plan date stamped June 24, 2013. Grading plan date stamped June 24, 2013. 10 • Utility plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped June 24, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one -year after City Council approval. If the plat is not filed it shall be deemed null and void. 6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. The park dedication fees are due prior to release of the final plat. 8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated July 19, 2013. 9. Compliance with the fire marshal recommendation in his email dated July 12, 2013. Deadline for a city decision: October 1, 2013 11 Draft ORDINANCE NO. 2013- Draft AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 5109 -5125 WEST 49th STREET (Vernon Townhomes) The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD) Subd. 4. Planned Unit Development District -5 (PUD -5) — 5109 -5125 West 49t Street (Vernon Townhomes) A. Legal Description; B. _ _Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re- development plans received by the City on , 2013, except aS amended by City Council Resolution No. 2013- , on file in the Office 'of the Planning Department under file number 2013- 005.13a.j C. Principal Uses :; Residential buildings containing six or fewer units' D. Accessory Uses:; All accessory uses allowed in the R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District Signs allowed per the Planned Residential District.; E. Conditional Uses: None Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX F. Development Standards. Development standards per the PRD -2 Zoning District, except the following: Building Setbacks Front — 49t Street :Front — Vernon Side — East Rear — South Building Height Building Coverage 35 feet — structure 18 feet — stair /deck/patio 7 feet 15 & 42 feet 15 feet 2-1/2 stories or 35.5 feet 26% Parking Stalls (Residential) 2 enclosed stalls per unit Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX 0 Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX �. Stricken text —SAE Added text —XXXX M City of Edina 48TH.'TW o Lwgond 4801 5209 5205 5207 4801 H..se Number Laba7s 4636 Straat.Nome Luis SiZi 117 5113 5108 5!05'4800 4805 - Csl'Limit. 4803. We �t & dH11 is 7� Gmexs 4809 "' w � � d6f3 0 �k� OmE6 4810 W �WL 5120 5116.511215108 5104 5 Ay 4900 5217 ?8!2 4813 4617 f'-1 !Parks 4816 4821 ; parcel. 4816 4817 ,�gyLpy�rp pL 2 4825 5701 b 0° 4904 4820 4H21 4825 5121 5117 5113 4833 � a c RIl1LE AVP 4832 4837 4624 5120 5176.5112 5108 4641 4806 4626 4632 4836 4640 4840 4845 14 s R � N d0TH 8r w 4 tea.. 4912 4900 $21 5209 $'Of 105 , SO . 5207 5105 �3002' 5109 5117 - 125 4916 24 SDDO 5200 9 �9 4920 �p 5010 sow p es & w STS ti y 5007 �zz 5100 SYGLNGLA s 5013 24 0 5191 5035 5075 24 y ¢ �$ 24 5146 Q 5101 0 5116 2/ Frank TuHu Patk Wm rcWrFNASCJb cwpg.'C'u+37514 0 - 216h – -- PI®: 281172131® ®4® 4 -n qL 5115 49th St eiu ' tia �• Edina, MN 55436 E�cf . w Inr M City of Edina S �• .50,77 i �•.. • j r � LeHeri p; Ha,uR Numter LaLe is ry sheet Nam Labe is City Umifs b lalm a�amrs l r n j 5 "o v: _ s7r�r �l q ra aea,r y ��e a : I pacers , stus ; 27II8 Ae +i51Pht. 1c16 zj VT i Prii !I IY , 1 4 SfOS .-.. -•T . 1tt� 4 6DTH ST y 4 up; cft rc Cos scot ya C Y par -�� ti j I o ' �� � � � "• t f .� �'. � c`J • � zip �, J •Jc rwdn rA•'A Gmr R'C,.l.'rL2YL ` _ - 1'. -' I . w~+• :I:.O l G�i. _ _ ____ e P1®: 281171'1310040 rf,1 �;, i IT t��1 5115 49th St W �i L > <t ;;; �4 /I Edina, MN 55436 �`� . . .� J k7w-Wpv I ' aiod 'A � rp !4y. A- -OAN Wru,l 5 � F-w- " k� 7TW 64 �.-1,,..� 71 1 151 16 I 15112 51 oa 5120 jUU�J .B.o I 31 Y O 0. KZ M Q 0 J 3 ARC J�AVE �1 SITE PLAN i ®WMEHMMMMMM- KEY NOTES .mcsmw cwuom vn,+ s,.ws �' cs�s,wc swx ,�css: no uu.x, 0 ewun�m ,aEx csEE sxEn uo�1 0 a+XM+[M1f4 rt¢[5: (tE[ sKn E1o11 rsE 11.1, .oxn.w a.1� FREE ,. QD � C��� — - ` - B K V G R O U P Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boa man Kmoa Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Strcet Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Facsimile: 6 2- 339 -6212 — .bkvgraup.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Development Plan Submittal Vernon Avenue Townhomes �Tncnnorr PFASpNS Na [L1TE wh I owe -o oxa nar I SITE PLAN L900 o loll EKV—ry -EOE KEY NOTES .mcsmw cwuom vn,+ s,.ws �' cs�s,wc swx ,�css: no uu.x, 0 ewun�m ,aEx csEE sxEn uo�1 0 a+XM+[M1f4 rt¢[5: (tE[ sKn E1o11 rsE 11.1, .oxn.w a.1� FREE ,. QD � C��� — - ` - B K V G R O U P Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boa man Kmoa Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Strcet Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Facsimile: 6 2- 339 -6212 — .bkvgraup.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Development Plan Submittal Vernon Avenue Townhomes �Tncnnorr PFASpNS Na [L1TE wh I owe -o oxa nar I SITE PLAN L900 o loll EKV—ry -EOE .1 ZPL- - ---------- ---------- Ty --------------- Vernon Avenue Townhouses 04-08-13 scam Perspective View - Northeast BKV G R 0 U P Vernon Avenue Townhouses Perspective View - Northwest ,4-33-13 S-1- BKV G R O U P [&Z, R D ID VERNON AVENUE TOWNHOMES f � 49TH AVENUE - LOOKING EAST HuntAssociates B K r VERNON AVENUE TOWNHOMES PM at 49TH AVENUE - LOOKING WEST a. ", B K HuntAssoci �--7 D £I �i ai k os 4 a � - 1I1 =1I1 =1 1= 1I1= 1L =11= _- = III = III =I I I°l I I =1TI= III = III =III =1 1 =Il- III =III = III =�= 111 —I I �I L 1�1= 1J1 „�1 �1 -1TFJ� JL �1 � 1�1-� -Jj 11 �- TI=C =_ 1�FI� J�� 1�1 -1� 1 ICI ICI „11 �I �I T 1 ... ... i1 SITE WEST ELEVATION umn ro.s�ex � . 1=11 H I I- I _ =� I -fll -I I- III -1 LI 1-I I -11 I -I I-I 1- L1=111� I -11 - -I 1 1 -1 � I-I I _I� T Ihl�l I I�����TTTr --�i l Ir1- IITiI�T�i�Tlll l I�fl � TI�TiI I II T II I ITI i �irb���i- �ii�Ti � ITi=i I I ( =1ii = 1�lir~�I i II I�1Tl�� � II I �TLI�_TII T �I� I II��ITII� T II I IITII I �I�TIi� T I I� � i�Til I IIT��TI��TI� i / SITE SECTION NORTH -SOUTH �I :I i =11111- 1J1 -11= X11 I=t j[ - LL = L =1 I I I I I I 1 JAI I 1 -Lljj-Ljl 1=1 I I_ I I=1 I 1_� L i_ G 11W=W-J I -J =L- III - III -I i =l =I 1= 1J1= Iii -1I I -I 11- 111= ll1=1�= - ;11-1 T1° -11 -1 1-1 1 -1 1 -L -J 1 -1 1 -1 1- -1 1-1 �1 =1 hJJ1.; JJ 1= -� -1 1� -1 1=1 -L -1 I II -1 1 -1 1 =1 =1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 I F MI � -1 ELITE SECTION EAST -WEST - Vernon Avenue Townhouses Site Sections 0 B K V 40 &13 G R O U P ECE �� Commissioner Carr asked to amend the motion. to include the addition of architectural features along the north building wall. Commissioners Grabiel and Forrest accepted that amendment. Ayes; Scherer, Carr, Forrest, Grabiel. Nays; Schroeder, Potts, Carpenter and Staunton. Motion failed. V� B. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat. Edina Fifty- Five LLC. 5125 49th Street West and 5118 -5109 49th Street West Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Hunt Associates N requesting redevelopment of three lots, 5109 -5125 West 49th Street. The applicant is proposing to,tear down the existing two apartments and single family home on the site (10 units' total) and build_ a new 17 -unit attached housing development. The subject properties total 1.43 acres in size; therefore, the proposed density of;the project would be 12 units per acre. The existing property is zoned PRD -2, Planned Residential District4, which allows residential building containing six or fewer dwelling units. the existing apartments: contain four and five units each. The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the property to PUD, Planned Uniit.:Development. The site is guided LDAR, Low Density Attached Residential (44 units per acre) „therefore,`a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to MDR, Mediuni.Density Residential would .be required to allow a density of 5 -12 units per acre. The applicant narrative indicates'why they believe that a PUD rezoning is justified for this proposed development. Planner Teague stated, that staff recommends that the City Council approve the request for a ComprehensiGe Plan Amendment from LDAR,,Low;Density Attached Residential to MDR, Mediuri. `Density Residential (5 -12 units per acre) for the subject property based on the following findings: 1. The subject property is a transition area, and serves as a buffer from single - family homes to the north to Vernon`Avenue and the Grandview Commercial area to the south. 2. The proposal would be an .improvement over the current two existing apartment buildings and single - family home (10 units) on the site. Seven townhomes would face 49th Street and eight townhomes would face Vernon Avenue with the garages and drive aisle internal to the site. 3. The proposed two /three story buildings are generally consistent with existing height in the area. 4. The existing roadways would support the project. Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads. Page 6 of 13 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car.' b. Locate and orient buildings to fit with their existing and /or planned context by framing and complementing adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. c. Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service.areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent /surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets,, parks,.and open spaces. d. Regulate scale, massing, and height to provide complementary ;transitions to adjacent sites and nearby neighborhoods and areas. e. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities.that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Teague added that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PRD -2, Planned Residential District to'PUb; Planned Unit.Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to build 17 newtownhomes on the subject 1.43 acre parcel based on the following,find :r'p 1. The proposal would.create amore efficient and'creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenu,e..Today it is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees: The proposed site plan turns and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of two -story . townhomes. 2. `Parking areas and garages are internal to the site, and not visible from 49th street or Vernon Avenue... 3. The project ,would enhance pedestrian connections. The plan provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 49th to,Vernon, that would connect, not only this development, but the entire area to the north to the Grandview District. 4. Landscaping would be enhanced. Extensive Landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. The number of over story trees is over double the number required by City Code. The mature trees along Vernon Avenue would be preserved. Page 7 of 13 Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated February 13, 2013 and the final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated March 7, 2013. 3. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned .Unit Development for this site. Concluding, Teague recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat to. create a new 17 -lot townhome plat for the subject property based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. requirements. And subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The Final Plat must be considered within one -year after.: approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void.: 3. A shared parking and access agreement rrlust be established across the Plat. 4. The Park Dedication fee of $35;000 shall be`paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Appearing for the Applicant David Motzenbecker, Chris Palkowitsch; BKV Group, Ed Terhaar, Wenck Applicant Presentation Mr. Motzenbecker delivered a power'point presentation. He further informed the Commission BKV adjusted the development to better fit the site and meet the'goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Motzenbecker further explained the topography of the property played a large role in building design. Motzenbecker explained that they are putting in a plinth to minimize stairs, adding the plinth moves along the property line and raises it about two feet. Continuing, along the front the development team wanted to open the units up to the street . Small patios will be added on the top of the plinth. With graphics Motzenbecker explained the internal circulation, parking and guest parking. He pointed out there will be bike and pedestrian access and the site would be open creating a more welcoming space; this also creates a space that is public; not private. Motzenbecker introduced Chris Palkowitsch, project architect. Page 8 of 13 �ts-- Chris Palkowitsch told Commissioners that each unit would have their own entry and the exterior building materials have been chosen and will be cast stone, fiber - cement panels, and stained wood to warm the exterior palate. Palkowitsch said the project would promote energy efficiency and the conservation of natural resources. Continuing, Palkowitsch said general sustainability principles for the buildings and the site will be applied as follows: • It is possible the existing buildings will be relocated. • If the buildings are demolished many of the materials will be recycled. • Use of low VOC paints. • Energy Star appliance. • High — efficiency HVAC will be standard. • Stone, and cement board with recycled contents will be incorporated • Skylights will add additional daylight to each unit reducing energy consumption; and • Storm water infiltration and a variety of native plants. Motzenbecker also asked the Commission to note that'along Vernon Avenue the units are two -story with a gathering space in the front. Motzenbecker also pointed out that the front doors "are "sunken ", providing each unit with privacy from Vernon Avenue and passersby. Discussion Commissioner Forrest questioned accessibility and asked if.any units are without stairs. Forrest also stated parking concerns•her; especially' guest parking or lack thereof:- Mr. P responded any unit could be retro- fitted for an elevator. Commissio'ner.tare corimmented .that she observed that some garages have windows and questioned this reasoning: -Mr. Palkowitsch explained that the windows proposed for the garages are frosted; letting light in and providing a degree, of privacy. Commissioner Forrest asked how building height is measured. Planner Teague explained that building height is measured. from the existing grade. Chair Staunton stated tfie roofs di .66 proposed townhouses are flat and pointed out Edina's Comprehensive Plan suggests pitched roofs; not flat as proposed. Mr. Motzenbecker explained that the reason they went with the flat roof was to ensure that the buildings "tie" into the neighborhood. He noted that the majority of the roofs (single family homes) in the neighborhood are hip; adding the proposed flat roof "ties" in better while minimizing the impact of building height. Ed Terhaar addressed the Commission and gave a brief overview of traffic highlighting the following: • Proposed development is expected to generate 1 net trip during the weekday peak period, 2 net trips during the weekday pm and 29 weekday daily trips. • Intersections have adequate capacity; no improvements would be required. Page 9 of 13 d'14C • It should be noted that the entire neighborhood area has only one access point and if a train was stopped on the tracks for an extended period of time, additional steps would be needed to access this neighborhood; however, this exists with or without the proposed townhomes. Terhaar told the Commission townhouses tend to generate fewer trips than single family homes. He also acknowledged that the intersection of Vernon and Interlachen Boulevard can pose problems. Commissioners agreed with that statement. A discussion ensured on the ramifications of this development on neighborhood traffic, acknowledging the unique one.way in and out and railroad tracks. Chair Staunton acknowledged that this proposal is located in a unique setting with a one way in and out, agreeing if you go up the hill and try to turn left onto Intedachen Boulevard one can "sit" there for some time before there is an opening to turn. Mr. Terhaar agreed, adding he believes that movement is at service level D which isn't good; however, is acceptable in an urban setting. Commissioner Forrest questioned how often the figures_used forthe_traffic analysis report are updated. Mr. Terhaar responded they are updated on a regular basis; - adding "it was recently updated and the oj most current information was used in this analysis. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. The following spoke to the proposal: Michelle Anderson, 511249 th Street West Steve Russ, 5040 Hankerson Avenue Tony Wagner, 5120..West W h.Street Leslie Losey; 5165 West 49th Street Gail Helberebt, 5116 West 49th Street ` Mrs. Wagnerj.5120 West 49th. Street Chair, Staunton asked if anyone else: would like to speak to this issue; being none Commissioner Potts moved to close the,pUblic hearing: ,Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chair Staunton questioned how storm water and snow removal would be handled. Mr. Motzenbecker said they have a civil engineer on board that between now and final will work out the storm water management issues, adding he believes at this time runoff storage will be underground. Continuing, Motzenbecker said with regard to snow removal the excess snow will be moved off site. Chair Staunton said he observed on the schematics there are units with roof top decks and asked if that is an option. He pointed out neighbors privacy would be compromised. Mr. Motzenbecker said there is an interest in roof top decks, adding they would be an amenity on some of the units. Page 10 of 13 4P Commissioner Carr discussed density and setbacks and asked the developers if they ever considered removing the last townhouse unit on the east. She pointed out this unit directly abuts a residential home and if that unit were removed that area could be used for guest parking. Mr. Motzenbecker responded they hadn't considered that option. Chair Staunton directed the discussion back to the Comprehensive Plan and the requested amendment to increase density and have a. flat roof. Commissioner Carpenter said he doesn't have a problem in increasing density in this location. Commissioner Forrest said she struggles with an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan noting the Comprehensive Plan is the City's development guide. Commissioner Schroeder commented that his struggle would be leaving the site low density, adding the step from low density to medium density may actually encourage redevelopment, and in this instance seems reasonable. Schroeder said this project could be considered one of the first steps in the GranclView Plan, noting the increase in density. isn't at the upper end of what's permitted in medium density. Chair Staunton stated he agrees with 'Commissioner Schroeder. Continuing, Schroeder said in his opinion( from a site plan perspective) that he doesn't mind the intensity, and in fact, would slide the entire development over;; closer to. Vernon Avenue, narrow the'dr.iveway and squeeze the site together from all sides. Schroeder said if this is done the impact•of the building height from 49th street would be minimized. Commissio.ne.r. Forrest said she wasn't adverse to the project; however has a concern. She said she doesn't what this site to appear claustrophobic and negatively impact the neighbors. The neighbors do have legitimate concerns. ` Chair Staunton said he agrees the neighbors have legitimate issues; however change in this location makes sense. Continuing, Staunton:said he really likes the look of the project from Vernon Avenue, adding he also believes the use of PO' in this instance is correct. Staunton said he also likes that the site provides a pathway to Vernon Avenue for not only residents of the townhouses but area residents as well. He also stated he things the bike curb is another plus. Continuing, Staunton said the trick of this project is to make the transition from residential to the commercial area off Vernon Avenue friendly. Concluding, Staunton said he does have a concern with the overall building height and the flat roof (especially from West 49th Street). Commissioner Forrest questioned who would maintain the Vernon Avenue access. Mr. Motzenbecker responded that the association for the townhomes would maintain the access. Page 11 of 13 Ot Minutes /Edina City Council /April 15, 2013 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application fora time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to release of the final plat, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the District's requirements. b. Enter into a Developers Agreement with the City. The Developers Agreement shall include the requirement for construction of the sidewalk as proposed. c. Pay the park dedication fee of $10,000. d. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with the overall grading plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. e. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering's memo dated March 22, 2013. f. A construction management plan will be required for the overall development of the site, and for each individual home construction. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the City Engineer. h. Establishment of a tree and slope conservation easement as demonstrated on the grading and tree preservation plan. Approval of a conservation easement with the final plat. i. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road. j. The applicant must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street, and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The configuration shall be subject to approval of the Director of Engineering. k. A stop sign is required to be installed on the new street approaching Morningside Road. Clear sight lines shall be maintained from the intersection. I. Use of Lot 7 for the overall grading of the development will require compensation to the City of Edina. A restoration plan shall be submitted by the applicant subject to review and approval by the City Council. m. The new road shall be built to the City standards, including a 27 -foot width. n. Signage stating "No Parking Fire Lane" along one side of the roadway the entire length of the road. o. Installation of fire hydrant(s) near end of cul -de -sac, and possibly at intersection of Morningside. Fire hydrant location is subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. p. Submittal of a landscape plan showing trees in the right -of -way. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. Vlll. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY REZONING TO PUD, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT, HUNT ASSOCIATES 5109 — 5125 WEST 49TH STREET _ RESOLUTION NO. 2013-33 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2013-37 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague advised the proponent had submitted revised plans based on the Council's comments at the April 2, 2013, meeting. The revised plans removed one unit, increased the northeast setback from 15 feet to 42 feet, increased the setback on 491h Street to 36 feet, added sidewalk on 49`h Street, provided additional greenspace, implemented a one -way drive with additional drive and curb cut (trash truck access) and added three guest parking spaces. Proponent Presentation Page 5 1�c� Minutes /Edina City Council /April 16, 2013 Chris Palkowitsch, BKV Group, provided an overview of the revised plans. He presented the preliminary materials board and visual renderings of the proposed plan. The Council discussed the revised plans, noting its similar density with the proposed five townhomes along 491h Street facing five existing single - family homes. It was suggested that a right turn lane onto Brookside Avenue be considered for improved traffic flow. City Engineer Houle advised there would need to be consideration of an additional emergency access into the neighborhood. He informed the Council that the infiltration system was sufficient to handle the drainage for the development. Dan Hunt, Developer, answered questions raised by the Council. He indicated that the stairway down from Vernon Avenue would be lit and the trash pickup would not require backing up the vehicle to access the end two units. A smaller truck would service the development with the driver walking to pick up the cans for the two end units. Member Bennett verified with staff that the Urban Land Institute had conducted its workshop for Council, Planning Commission members, and staff on "The New Normal" in development as a free service. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -33, approving a Guide Plan Amendment from LDAR, Low Density Attached Residential (4 -8 units per acre) to MDR, Medium Density Residential (5 -12 Units per acre) at 5109 -5125 West 491h Street for Hunt Associates based on the following findings: 1. The subject property is a transition area, and serves as a buffer from single - family homes to the north to Vernon Avenue and the Grand View Commercial area to the south. 2. The proposal would be an improvement over the current two existing apartment buildings and single - family home (10 units) on the site. Five townhomes would face 49`h Street and three townhomes would face west, and eight townhomes would face Vernon .Avenue; the garages and drive aisle are internal to the site. 3. The proposed two / three story buildings are generally consistent with existing height in the area. 4. The existing roadways would support the project. Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads. S. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. b. Locate and orient buildings to fit with their existing and / or planned context by framing and complementing adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces. c. Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas; and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent / surrounding properties without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces. d. Regular scale, massing and height to provide complementary transitions to adjacent sites and nearby neighborhoods and areas. e. Encourage infill / redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and / or corridor context and character. And subject to the following condition: 1. Final Rezoning to PUD and Final Development Plan approval for the project. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. Page 6 IjA Minutes /Edina City Council /April 15, 2013 Member Bennett recalled that Council members had asked ULI panelists how Edina could best facilitate redevelopment, and that the panelists had replied that the Council should develop clear rules and then follow them. She quoted one of the panelists, who had stated "the Comprehensive Plan is not the Dead Sea Scrolls, but neither should it be changed cavalierly for every development that comes along." Member Bennett continued that medium to high density development was not appropriate next to single family homes, and approving that development was not consistent with the city's stated goal of protecting residential neighborhoods. The Council discussed the benefits of the subject development, including the similar density with the proposed five townhomes along 49`h Street facing five existing single - family homes and addition of the sidewalk on 491h Street. It was stressed that the proposed development would improve the neighborhood, not adversely impact it. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -37, approving Preliminary Rezoning from PRD -2, Planned Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development Preliminary Development Plan & Preliminary Plat at 5109 -5125 West 491h Street for Hunt Associates based on the following findings: - 1. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today it is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan turns and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of two -story townhomes. 2. Parking areas and garages are internal to the site, and not visible from 49`h Street or Vernon Avenue. 3. The project would enhance pedestrian connections. The plan provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 49`h to Vernon, that would connect, not only this development, but the entire area to the north to the GrandView District. 4. Landscaping would be enhanced. Extensive landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. The number of over story trees is over double the number required by City Code. The mature trees along Vernon Avenue would be preserved. 5. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans date stamped April 9, 2013. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated March 7, 2013. 4. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 5. Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development, PUD. 6. The Final Plat must be considered within one year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 7. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 8. The Park Dedication fee of $35,000 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. 9. There shall be no rooftop decks. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. VIILB. PLANNING COMMISSION 2013 WORK PLAN AMENDMENT —APPROVED Mr. Teague presented the 2013 Work Plan Amendment for the Planning Commission to conduct a Small Area Plan for the Valley View and Wooddale areas, which had been identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a potential area of change. The anticipated cost would be $25,000 to $75,000 depending on the scope of work to be done by a consultant. Mr. Teague stated TIF monies were available from this development district that could be applied to pay for the cost of this study. Page 7 4a` MEMORANDUM BKV G. R o u P PROJECT: Vernon Avenue Housing Architecture Interior Design TO: Cary Teague Landscape Architecture Engineering FROM: Chris Palkowitsch Boarman Kroos Vogel CLIENT 1 FIRM NAME: Edina Fifty Five, LLC COMM. NO.: 1874.01 Group Inc. DATE: 06.24.13 222 North Second Street Minneapolis. MN 5501 Telephone: 612.339.37752 Development pp RE: Narrative for Vernon Avenue Dlo t Final Application Facsimile: 612.339.6212 www.bkvgroup.com EOE Through meetings with the city council and planning commission during the course of the preliminary design application process, the Vernon Avenue Housing development has been reconfigured to be a 16 -unit townhome development. The units will be 3 levels each with their own tuck -under 2 -car garage and 2 guest spaces behind their garage. They will range in gross floor area from 2780 to 3364 square feet. The development is located on three parcels of land adjacent to the Vernon Avenue exit ramp from Hwy. 100 southbound. The parcels are between Vernon Avenue on the south and 49th Street on the north. The development is envisioned to meet the demands of empty- nesters and those who want to stay in Edina and downsize their homes. However, life -cycle housing is currently in short supply. We see this development ensuring a high quality of design that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, as well as fitting in nicely with the current GrandView Heights Small Area Plan and many of its suggestions. Taking the Planning Commission's and Staff's previous comments into consideration, we've reduced the density and scale to something we feel better fits within the neighborhood context. Sixteen units currently equates to approximately 11.42 units /acre. The building has been reduced in height from the previous scheme from 4 stories to 3 stories, fitting within the zoning requirements for height. �� Adding a townhome development at this location is appropriate and will bring �'�� public value to the city and neighborhood. The creation of life -cycle housing with a high -level of amenities is an excellent public value. With its location near Hwy. believe that b locating allows the development t here that we are eliminating additional ve Y 9 p 9 traffic that will filter into the heart of the neighborhood One of the key elements of our site plan is how we are connecting the development to greater Edina. We are still planning to add a public walkway to our site that connects 49th Street and the neighborhood beyond directly to Vernon �a:� Avenue. This access route works directly into the small area plan route suggestions of bicycle and pedestrian paths. We also anticipate improving the sidewalk and boulevard along Vernon, helping to create a better connection to the east. We envision this as a catalyst towards beginning the "complete streets" transformation of Vernon as outlined in the small area plan. One of our sustainability goals is to retain as much of the mature vegetation and trees as possible, ensuring the development has a good vegetative buffer from the surrounding traffic. This -also benefits the developments heating and cooling costs; as the trees will help keep the building cooler during the summer months, and when the leaves drop, allow the sun to warm the building during winter. The parcels - 5109, 5117, and 5125 49th Street W — are 60,850 square feet (1.4 acres) in size and zoned PRD -2. The current zoning allows 2.5 stories /30' and 6 units. The very top elevation of this project is 36' at the high parapet condition. The main roof is 32'. We have worked extensively with the planning commission and city council to create appropriate setbacks and site sections drawings, these relationships were preliminary approved. This submittal is now the final application for the project. In the preliminary submittal we worked through the following land use applications: 1. Rezoning from PRD -2 to PUD 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 3. Preliminary Development Plan Application We ask for your support and recommendations of approval for this submittal. A 22.Z A BKV' G R O U P A ��N �oFAq'Ql' T� ' Vernon Ave S Vernon Ave 5 llllll',Iill VERNON AVENUE TOWNHOMES - EXISTING AERIAL B • 02. 13.2013 -j •i i .e I_- ' � 1 � k .tl PL1NVAIG, DEPgRT LpW JUN 2 4 2013 J VERNON AVENUE TOWNHOMES - SITE PICTURES • 02.13.2013 49TH AVE - LOOKING i A RJ 6'' h 49TH AVE - LOOKING WEST i -I-- CP 47 . 2 3 oi%o 1w. . 11414 --A -- Ar rN 4L w- 11-61, Jill VERNON AVL - LOOKING WEST AA.a, w VERNON AVE - LOOKING EAST P> ~' t7 1 { ra (� PAINTED FIBER CEMENT W/ BATTERNS zt:lp- FIT � r __7 . -_ STAINED WOOD PANELS FIBER CEMENT TRIM VERNON AVENUE TOWNHOMES - MATERIALS 0 3 0 3. 2 0 1 3 W V � P R :EL) M ji jkA k Pb T SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS OBR /EN KIMMEL R.T. Doc. No. I C.R.DOC.No. -------------------------------- I - - - - -- _J I I I I � $ � I NBY.wbYr tlSaO NORTH I 8 xm mnotl 8 .so �rp9� mt xnmm I o zo - s• °A I _ I 1 I I I ao Block z sULE IN FEET . a I� $ 1 e 2 3I 4 WTI I gl' 9.St a I •I I a 10 3 ; 1 outlot H.moesooz I Block 2 „� -- ,- -= I I yr' 7 3 2s 3 = a Block 3 r" HTr��E \ •L 1 _ _ _—^, Jam— - - - - -1 - - - - -- L -- - - - -I— - - - - -'1 — — — — -- L SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS OBRF KIMMEL ------ - 1 IuUU -_J .ew p 2. mg N 1 A ARC F- AVE T PLAN KEY ND7ES m19°ew.a�v o0 mwp .m ws, .v m BKV G R O U P bdaior Dmign land —pe Arthitedu 6lgtllE'Clfllg Buarman K.- V Group 222 North 5—d Stmd K—apob MN 55901 Teleph"' 612- 339 -3752 Fa—b-- Fa- 612- 339 -6212 — .bkvgroup.m,n NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Final Development Plan Submittal Vemon Avenue Townhomes srrEPLAN, 4i. rb�.o r LI00 O 1011 Ed OO..k EOE w KEYNOTES Qi .aaysa oa.� wa Eu.o Q �mw � aos o.e< u � r�a<nrtn e°°ur°.•`olmw rx omm O00 mn0 roam. ev w O uam rOM n.� ®o m. Pa Om v.n Q r. Q us mwue �, mwow. � IOa am uan Q nm mwc _ QQ ®� Qe v....oaw.wwc: sm.�on Q laws ®.w�.c n.. c� vm.wn e .m ' - LEGEND: cnarrao irn pU1N AIL 7 r c BKV G R O U P Intmior Design Landsmpe Alrhitet Engineering . Beaman Krum Vogel Gmup 4m 212 North Semnd Street Mmneapolis MN 55901 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Fammil. 612- 339 -6212 vw.v,bkvgroup.— NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Final Development Plan Submittal Vernon Avenue Tovmhorns mnarwiun 1 �.�me.urrwroE. gmn MNAMq or N-TQl% PIANO, f , I ��^^�°�' CY L102 O alll BNGapk WE O*'W •• ••3�[i3� ©mom Oni romt�'�es���m�a mn�r•���� oro��mi2» oomr• arv�Q�a��m� ®�m� mo���lom m ©c-•.����m�rr BKV G R O U P Intmior Design Landsmpe Alrhitet Engineering . Beaman Krum Vogel Gmup 4m 212 North Semnd Street Mmneapolis MN 55901 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Fammil. 612- 339 -6212 vw.v,bkvgroup.— NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Final Development Plan Submittal Vernon Avenue Tovmhorns mnarwiun 1 �.�me.urrwroE. gmn MNAMq or N-TQl% PIANO, f , I ��^^�°�' CY L102 O alll BNGapk WE DETAIL 2 LEGEND: �a � ocawn E V G h - U P LMiior Design Uncisope Architffium Engineering B.— Krona Vogel Grp Inc 222 Noah Semnd 51ree[ M n. -P-Es MN 55901 Td-ph.- 612- 339 -3752 Fammle: 612 - 3391212 — .bkvgroep- NOT FOR CONSFRUCTION Final Development Plan Submittal Vemon Avenue Tovmhomes a m+ .+r..yaawr`.waw e.nrPV°aa.�m�ix� PLAN DETAIL 2 L103 Ow,�.m a .n., pam.n K p. oa��o ®a mo�����m� oom�csa�al� onaa �� ®ate mo����m v ©� m o ®���m sa v om� ©mom ®gym® oo � �mC C � WIIIIIIIII LEGEND: �a � ocawn E V G h - U P LMiior Design Uncisope Architffium Engineering B.— Krona Vogel Grp Inc 222 Noah Semnd 51ree[ M n. -P-Es MN 55901 Td-ph.- 612- 339 -3752 Fammle: 612 - 3391212 — .bkvgroep- NOT FOR CONSFRUCTION Final Development Plan Submittal Vemon Avenue Tovmhomes a m+ .+r..yaawr`.waw e.nrPV°aa.�m�ix� PLAN DETAIL 2 L103 Ow,�.m a .n., pam.n K p. LEGEND: �a � ocawn E V G h - U P LMiior Design Uncisope Architffium Engineering B.— Krona Vogel Grp Inc 222 Noah Semnd 51ree[ M n. -P-Es MN 55901 Td-ph.- 612- 339 -3752 Fammle: 612 - 3391212 — .bkvgroep- NOT FOR CONSFRUCTION Final Development Plan Submittal Vemon Avenue Tovmhomes a m+ .+r..yaawr`.waw e.nrPV°aa.�m�ix� PLAN DETAIL 2 L103 ::3pp STONE AC ENT BKV WALLS AT STAIR G R 0 U P STONEACbENT WALLS AT STAIR ---- w: - ------- J. rr j --r L RAISED PLANTERS li-K AndvItechtne Interior Design Landscape Architecture V.—ng Kr— G up 222 North Second Street Minneapolis MN 11411 Telephone 612-339-3752 Facsimilo. 612-339-6212 I - - - -e - - - - P- - - -- BUILDING C (C - UNITS) ---LL --- I --------- - NOTE: SEE A200 SHEETS FOR - — ------- BUILDING 8 (B - UNITS) ---------- ii II UNIT PLAN LAYOUTS MILE VemorlAvenue BUILDING A2 Townhomes e� (A-QNITSY- 7-7 1 ------ F --- 1 6 BUILDING Al io n (A-UNITS) L/ - -- - F ---- I F ---- I 11 I 4' ---- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------- J BAS F-MjECAN NXN FLQTR P Al 00 u— —a\VG-*—X W 4.. a LLJ 1 i- - I ,.1 L�ll1� � =_ �� 11 ,I ram � I j �� L . , I', , i �! It' ®I IIII� I _�� ■ IIII� I _ ■,' J �I . -_ I' - © I ■ ■I I � ■1 I!I I!■I I ■I I ■I I ■I I!I Illl�lk, ��L: 1.1 ": • "I ►� I I•I 1.1 IIII�_tl 1 =11 =1 HIM I � Illllli 1�11111111�11111 ��® . AN . XN .� C71 x(71 �� � i'i "� .- �'i _ � �T lil I■I �_ lit lil ���� -- - - ail �. �1 1 ■ ■ C71i C71 I � J .L � J•O — - - - �• ',�I ..I �_. li! ICI I. lC7 - IC7r -; II.I ICI T � lil E L V G '.. U Archkecwre Interior Design landsmpe ArchitwW B,tnceng ■—•n ■- Vugc1 Group me 222 North Second Street Mmneapola MN 55901 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Faaimle: 612- 339 -6212 vivw.bkvgroup.com I NH.lTO1J15 Vernon Avenue Townhomes MYMW N3UMNbdNJ 1 r uwlntvaaloswaul,on rffi FIRST FLOOR PLAN 3 A101 OW EWG.*ftEM I I LI � CL1 ..L U, ,4 44 II � I II � I I ii I I r I O IS I I I. do-- — — I NOTE: SEE A200 SHEETS FOR UNIT PLAN LAYOUTS I I � I I I � I I � � I I I I I ' I I I I • 'i p i BKV G R O U P A'dut -b- Interior Desip landscape ArdrftM Engineerhg Boecman Wow Vosd Group Inc 222 North Second Streee Mimeapob MN 55901 Tekphon' 612- 339 -3752 Fa®nie: 612- 339 -6212 www.b kvgroup. mn .WUX� Vernon Avenue Tovmhomes carmI,. INre � roseurtA SECOND FLOOR PLAN A102 I I I L! J I I � I 11NG NITS) I I g CRIC a— Scul I BUILDING Al (A - UNITS) I I I E V G IN - U P Arohitectt re Interior Design landscape Ardlitlmn Engineering Baartnan Group Inc 222 North 5etnnd 5 Minneapolis MN ' Telephone: 612-339 - Fars ". 612-339 - w bkvgroup. kTaLTOM5 Vemon Avenue Townhomes MRPN N RR AWN �tmrama I rvYyM18 �mavaxi �°nS eoo"smn�rc� ROOF PLAN Al 03 I CRICKET, TYP. i � I I SCUPPERS, TYP.I I I BUILDING B (B - UNITS) HIGH PARAPET WALL, 48" AT BUILDING'TOWERS" rl I E Yp PARAPET WALL, 24 ", P. I I T' Typ' ERs, TYP. BUILDING (A- UNITS) A2 -- - - - ---fll I P. I kVERF'LOWII* CRICK ET, TIP. I SCUPPERS, TYP.— I E V G IN - U P Arohitectt re Interior Design landscape Ardlitlmn Engineering Baartnan Group Inc 222 North 5etnnd 5 Minneapolis MN ' Telephone: 612-339 - Fars ". 612-339 - w bkvgroup. kTaLTOM5 Vemon Avenue Townhomes MRPN N RR AWN �tmrama I rvYyM18 �mavaxi �°nS eoo"smn�rc� ROOF PLAN Al 03 c,a L/ Ir•J C1. W f 1�1 �!1 i LU _i cn. rl Nodh FJevation - Courtyard BuBdnn A - -=A-t (1 Wesl Devotion - Builtllna A BKV G R O U P A.h tecIIuo Interior Dedv, La &q. Ardulewue E*ne.lrg B- Kroos an Vogd Group Inc 222 North Sewnd Strc Minneapolis MN 554 Telephone: 612- 339 -37. faaimk 612- 339 -62 — .bkvgroup.w 0 TP ROt3.TTnE Vemon Avenue ToWnhomes 1a:rawr ruawraa Cmre gawzt �� Y umronaamsmanvro� t �\ EXTERI,QR` EL: IONS A401 OM BNQoq EM CJ� w —9 w z � Easl Elevallon - CoudyaM Building C Ll.r..v n west Elevation - Building C rl Sgulh Elevallon - Buildino C eu»ac� BKV G R O U P kftdw Deslgi landsupa Ardiitemuc Engi6 Bgaeman Brow Vagd Group klc 222 North Second Sor Minneapofs MN 55, Telephone: 612- 339 -3i Fa.bu k - 612- 339 -63 vrmv. bkvg ro up.. �6LVNI5 Vernon Avenue Townhomes MYRMI llpiRlNdaN rfnarnnm nme,o "nw,A°�d'endsmars, na A403 Q— BNew,kem 91 I �I I (�1 I �i F— 1 l T') SITE WEST ELEVATION M SECTION NO SOUTH SITE SECTIO EAST-MrST 2 J P Arth t. 4b- ,t.e- Desig, landsape kdrdl Md En &—ing awrrnan Kenos Vegd Grog b. 222 North Second Street Mimeapolis MN 55401 Telephone 612 - 339 -3752 Faint 1e: 612 -339 -6212 —hkv g ro up. win CIIS.LTA'Jlu Vernon Avenue Townhomes umentusar.sonatrtrtcn BUILDING /SITE SECTIONS A501 m BKV G R 0 U P Ar ihMoee Interior Des!Vi Lampe Architec4ue Engineering 9oarman Woo Vogel Gr-p Inc 222 Nonh Second Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone: 612- 339 -3752 Faaim]le 612- 339 -6212 vmw. b lc v g r o u p. com PIERCE PIN] 9t ASSOCIATES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Final Development Plan Submittal Vemon Avenue Tovmhomes vasuxnsmN �.rN.r�..aear uvolu�.m� - \V`0 uvmora Ne wre �Qnr�3� aY pO A,` OJNn®ON N6 ice* SITE LAYOUTAND PAVING PLAN ® r SITE. LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN C300 v o mu ovcn,wr<me E V G J P Aldutem- Interior Design Boarman K— Vogel Group L- 222 North Second Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone 612- 339 -3752 Faai le: 612- 339 -6212 wvnv.bkvgroup.mm PIERCE PINI & A550CLATES NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION Final Development Plan Submhal Vernon Avenue Townhomes vio 'uswora � wn YJe( onnvm ar om®ar cwv�,na GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C400 o m° --.ax y 0 0 ✓— � -- --- d - - - -= -------------r----------- n.wn.. 149ml tre West • / c�_ ---rte I� T1 .�,� — w n � ••. ! I 1• '�— w r r w I I Ting I � 0 12 Bro 7. - j /Bb 50th Street West. I • %= —'"_ �' . ✓wr °I ° 156) I r °,I I •' —� ^r --- - - -1 -- �_— -- J------ 1------ L- - - - - -J r „�PJenJeu. �° Vernon r I r R a ® (1GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN s E V G J P Aldutem- Interior Design Boarman K— Vogel Group L- 222 North Second Street Minneapolis MN 55401 Telephone 612- 339 -3752 Faai le: 612- 339 -6212 wvnv.bkvgroup.mm PIERCE PINI & A550CLATES NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION Final Development Plan Submhal Vernon Avenue Townhomes vio 'uswora � wn YJe( onnvm ar om®ar cwv�,na GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C400 o m° --.ax FL 1-7 BKV G R 0 U P Ardutedb- Intedor Design Landscape Architsb.. .2 aarm K.- Vogel tre4f West • T 222 North Second Stre KmeWks MN 55401 Ncshnil. 612-339-6212 'y w w .bkvgroup.com PIERCE PINT — III I I n - — — — — — ASSOCIATES NOTFOR r CONSTRUCTION Final 74 1 7 \A I 1 I Development Plan Submittal RR 4 Vemon Avenue Tomhornes 14 6, 13 ll 12 Bro 0 ic! Street West 50th aosm --------------- qpfi (Go - — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — lent"' n e, M— -- '41 UTILITY PLAN LITY PLAIN C500 -J 0 W13 MG — S��Ar 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 1 net trip during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 2 net trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 29 net weekday daily trips. • All of the analyzed intersections have adequate capacity with existing geometries and control to accommodate the proposed development. No improvements are needed at these intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • The maximum southbound vehicle queue lengths at the Vernon Avenue /Interlachen Boulevard intersection do not interfere with operations at the Interlachen Boulevard/Brookside Avenue intersection under 2015 Build conditions. • The maximum westbound queue at the Interlachen Boulevard /Brookside Avenue intersection does not result in any operational issues. • The proposed project is located in a neighborhood that has only one roadway access point to the surrounding street system. The neighborhood is bound by the creek on the north, T.H. 100 on the east, and Vernon Avenue on the south. In addition, railroad tracks are located immediately east of Brookside Avenue. A review of the entire neighborhood area did not reveal an obvious location for a secondary access. If a train was stopped on the tracks for an excessive amount of time, additional steps would be needed to access the neighborhood. F., ff �ili� CITY OF MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 A. Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com 0 Date: July 18, 2013 H'�o. •ay To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Vernon Townhomes Dated June 24, 2013 Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plan and offer the following comments: O A Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. O A developer's agreement will be required for the placement of the public water main and sanitary sewer and for any other public improvements. O Reconstruct sidewalk along Vernon Avenue to be a boulevard style sidewalk; i.e. 5 -foot grass area between roadway and sidewalk. Sheet 200• • Remove all individual sewer and water services from the respective mains along 49`h St W. Due to the extent of patching required the roadway will need to be repaved from curb to curb along the entire development. Sheet 500• • Provide all documentation that was required by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit, including the maintenance agreement for the Underground Chamber Storage System. • Provide a looped watermain by extending the watermain along the easterly side of development to 49`h St W. • Add fire hydrant to westerly side of entry to development. • Redesign sanitary sewer that exits the site to not have as steep of grade. • Minimum size of sanitary sewer main should be 8- inches. • The water and sanitary sewer systems should be indicated that they are public. Sheet L 100• • Show potential future roadway as shown in the Grandview plan. • Address noise along Vernon Avenue and if development should also include noise mitigation, such as a noise wall, specialized windows, heating and cooling systems, etc. • Maybe include more bio- retention areas to infiltrate the surface water. This could also be done with reuse of roof water, cisterns such as rain - barrels, etc. • Use permeable pavers for the driveways. • Where will the snow that is removed from the drive isle and driveways be stored? Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. G: \PW\ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \40 - 49 Streets\5 125 -5109 49th St W (Vernon Townhomes) \Vernon Townhomes\Staff Engineering Department • 7450 MMeetro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 44 Cary Teague From: Jeff Siems Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 3:40 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Wayne Houle; Steve Kirchman; Brian Olson; Andy Medzis; Marty Scheerer Subject: Vernon Avenue townhomes Fire Department PC comments Attachments: Truck 12205 Turning Performance Analysis Report.pdf Ca ry, Following our PC meeting this morning, here are some initial comments regarding the proposed Vernon Avenue Townhome project.from the fire department: 1. It appears that the private roadway is shown as being 18'. Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) 503.1.1 exception 1 requires fire sprinkler protection of the structure(s). 2. The roadway minimum width shall be 20' (and include sprinklers noted above) per MSFC 503.2.1. 3. The roadway angle of approach /departure, turning radius and weight capacity shall meet the fire departments largest vehicle per MSFC 503.2.3, 503.2.4, 503.2.7 (see attached) 4. Private fire hydrants shall be.located per MSFC 508.5 (Confer with City of Edina Engineering for number and location). 5. Portions of the roadways may require signage of "fire lane, no parking" (MSFC 503.3). Jeff Siems, Fire Marshal 952- 826 -0337 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0393 isiems(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Fire To read news about what matters most, read the EFD Pulse blo . AMC Turning Performance Analysis - ----------- --------------- Additional Bumper Depth 1 Axle Track f— Wheel Offset NIA �� —Cramp Angle Chassis Overhang / P\ \ ►( -` —Tread Width Wheelbase / ; 10 Ay 0 Cv�b Vim''' l 9 ' R s I I Inside Turning Radius �1 Parameters: 5/1/2013 Inside Cramp Angle: 45.000 Axle Track: 81.92 in. Wheel Offset: 5.25 in. Tread Width: 16.60 in. Chassis Overhang: 65.99 in. Additional Bumper Depth: 19.00 in. Front Overhang 84.99 in. Wheelbase: 258.00 in. Calculated Turning Radii: Inside Turn: 20 ft. 4 in. Curb to Curb: 36 ft. 8 in. Wall to Wall: 41 ft. 1 in. Comments: Truck 12205 Components PRIDE # Description Front Tires 0078244 Tires, Michelin, 425/65822.50 20 ply XZY 3 tread Chassis 0070220 Dash -2000, Chassis, PAP /SkyArm/Midmount Front Bumper 0123625 Bumper, 19" extended, ImpNel Aerial Device 0006900 xxxAerial, 100' Pierce Platform Notes: Actual Inside Cramp Angle may be less due to highly specialized options. Curb to Curb turning radius calculated for a 9.00 inch curb. Page 1 of 2 FA •. Jackie Hoogenakker :rom: theabels2 @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:51 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: ianhabel @aol.com Re: Development plan for 5109 -5125 49th St. W. and the Planning Commission meeting July 24: We have lived at 5104 Millpond PI., one block north, for 21 years and are very much in favor of the proposed rezoning and planned unit development. 49th St. W. is the gateway to our entire neighborhood, as this is a no- outlet area. The existing apartment buildings and vacant single - family home and properties are extremely unsightly, and becoming more so. Some realtors have stated that the properties in this area are less desirable because the neighborhood entrance looks so shabby. This proposed development seems to us a significant improvement! We are confident that the proposed development will be pleasing and appealing to the neighborhood and potential buyers as well. This is a great location, and probably will appeal to many who, like ourselves, are at the stage in life where less property maintenance and upkeep is desirable. We personally know others that would consider moving into the proposed development! Some places in Edina are undeserving of being torn down, but these 3 properties surely need to be redeveloped. Sincerely, Ian and Julia Abel 1 Hennepin _U April 2, 2013 Hennepin County Public Works Transportation Department Public Works Facility 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 -5421 Mr. Wayne Houle, P.E. Director of Engineering City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Phone: 612- 596 -0300 Web: www.co.hennepin.mn.us Re: Preliminary Development Plan Review — Vernon Avenue Townhomes Northwest Quadrant of Vernon Ave (CSAH 15 8) and TH 100 Hennepin County Plat Review No. 3271 Dear Mr. Houle: �QF1 4 �p13 Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. The preliminary development plan for the Vernon Avenue Townhomes was received by Hennepin County on March 5, 2013. Based on our review, the following comments are provided: Access — Based on the preliminary development plan (dated 2/13/13), access for the Vernon Avenue Townhomes will be provided on 49th Street. No direct access will be provided to CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue). Right -of -Way — Based on our understanding, Mn/DOT currently controls all of the right -of -way in the northwest quadrant of Vernon Avenue and TH 100. It appears that all of the parcels in this quadrant have restricted access designated in their deeds to these roadways. No additional right - of -way is being requested by the county as part of this proposed development. Permits — Please inform the developer that all proposed construction within county right -of -way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Permit questions can be directed to Steve Groen at (612) 596 -0337 or steve.,aroen(&co.hennepin.mn. us. Please contact Bob Byers (612) 596 -0354 or robert byers( co.hennepin.mn.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, James N. Grube, P.E. Director of Transportation and County Engineer JNG /cj s cc: Plat Review Committee Mark Larson, Hennepin County Survey Office An Equal Opportunity Employer • k ", • �`�roRrotu�T� • lees To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.B. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: August 20, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Preliminary Plat with lot width and lot area variances, Rod Helm on behalf of Tom and Gretchen Shanight, 5612 Tracy Avenue. Resolution No. 2013 -65 Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. Information / Background: Rodney Helm on behalf of Tom and Gretchen Shanight is proposing to subdivide the property at 5612 Tracy Avenue into two lots. The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4 —A16 of the Planning Commission staff report.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; and 2. Lot width variances from 80.7 feet to 80 feet for each lot; lot depth variances from 157 feet to 122 feet; and lot area variances from 17,651 square feet to 9,820 square feet. Both lots would gain access off Tracy Avenue by a shared driveway, utilizing the existing driveway to the site. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 17,651 square feet, median lot depth is 157 feet, and the median lot width is 80.7. (See attached median calculations on pages A7 —A10.) This is a neighborhood with varrying lot sizes. Larger lots to the north across Vernon and to the east across Tracy Avenue have established the large minimum lot sizes for this property. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property in the same manner as the existing lots on the west side of Tracy Avenue . (See pages A2 —A3 & A17 —A19.) A subdivision with similar circumstances was recently approved in this area at 5633 Tracy Avenue by the applicant. (See attached plans and minutes from the Planning Commission and City Council meetings on pages A20 —A26.) Planning Commission Recommendation: On July 24, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously approved the Preliminary Plat. (Vote: 7 -0.) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50`h St. • Edina, MN 55424 ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2013 -65 Planning Commission minutes Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 24, 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-65 APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH LOT WIDTH AND LOT AREA VARIANCES AT 5612 TRACY AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mr. Rodney Helm on behalf of Tom and Gretchen Shanight is requesting a Preliminary Plat of 5612 Tracy Avenue divide the existing parcel into two lots. 1.02 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: The South 1 foot of the East 160 feet of Lot 6 and the East 160 feet of the North Half of Lot 7, WARDEN ACRES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.03 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Shanight Addition. 1.04 The proposed subdivision requires the following variances: Lot width variances from 80.7 feet to 80 feet for each lot; lot depth variances from 157 feet to 122 feet; and lot area variances from 17,651 square feet to 9,820 square feet. 1.05 On July 24, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat and Variances on a Vote of 7 -0. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block on the west side of Tracy Avenue north of Hawkes Drive. 3. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-65 Page Two 4. The 9,820 square foot lots are larger than the general standard minimum lot area of 9,000 square feet. 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is roughly two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the blocks north of Hawkes Drive and west of Tracy Avenue. c. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80 -foot wide, 9,000+ square foot lot, which is common to the area. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Plat and requested Variances for the proposed subdivision of 5612 Tracy Avenue. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Park dedication fee of $5,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 3. Vehicle access to these lots shall be off of Tracy Avenue. 4. Compliance with the conditions required by the director of engineering in his memo dated July 18, 2013. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-65 Page Two d. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. f. A private driveway easement established over Lot 1 to serve Lot 2 must be filed with Hennepin County. Adopted this _ day of , 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of . , 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2013. City Clerk y\)- A, V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Subdivision. Preliminary Plat. Shanight Addition. 5612 Tracy Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reported Rodney Helm on behalf of Tom and Gretchen Shanight is proposing to subdivide the property at 5612 Tracy Avenue into two lots. The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. To accommodate the request the following is required:A subdivision; and Lot width variances from 80.7 feet to 80 feet for each lot; lot depth variances from 157 feet to 122 feet; and lot area variances from 17,651 square feet to 9,820 square feet,; Planner Aaker stated both lots would gain access off Tr4 y,AVenue by'a'shared driveway, utilizing the existing driveway to the site. Within this neighborhood; the median lot area 5,17,651 square feet, median lot depth is 157 feet, and the median lot width is 80.7. This is a neighborhood with varrying lot sizes. Larger lots to the north across Vernon and to theeast across Tracy Avenue have established the large minimum lot sizes for this property. The applicant 'is'-"proposing to subdivide th'e::property in the same manner as the existing lots on the westside of Tracy•Atienue . Aaker reported that a subdivision with si Tracy Avenue by the applicant._ ntly approved in this area at 5633 Aaker concluded that,staff, "ecomr'r�ends that thd':,OtyCouncil approve,the proposed two lot subdivision \� \�` of 5612 Tracy Avenue; lotwidth variances from 80.746 80 to 80 feet for each lot; lot depth variances from 157 feet to 122 feet'foreach lot ;,arid lot area variances from 17,651 square feet to 9,820 square feet based on thefollowing findings ` , >. 1. Except for the variances; -the 'proposal meet's•the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. X 2. The rpposal is consistent,with tlte, lots on this block on the west side of Tracy Avenue north of Hawke\sy?Drive. 3. The 80466t;wide lot is widerthan the general standard required width of 75 feet. 4. The 9,820 squar • foot lots•are larger than the general standard minimum lot area of 9,000 square feet., 5. The proposal meets<th'e'eequired standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is roughly two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the blocks north of Hawkes Drive and west of Tracy Avenue. C. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. Page 2 of 15 d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80- foot wide, 9,000+ square foot lot, which is common to the area. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval.will be void. �`�`� 2. Park dedication fee of $5,000 must be paid prior to releasi.fofAhe final plat. 3. Vehicle access to these lots shall be off of Tracy Avenue 4. Compliance with the conditions required by the director of'enngineering in his memo dated July 18, 2013. Prior to issuance of a building permit\the following 'temps must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approdi I The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirem \ \ents;., b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained fromt a Edina, engineering department. , n W. , . C. A grading plan subject,to review and approval`of the city engineer. d. A construction management p .an`will be requi or the construction of the new homes. e. Utility hook ups;are subject t6review of -t "city engi ee Q* r ...� f. A privato driveway easement establishetl over Lot-1 to eve Lot 2 must be filed with Hennepin'County. [NTeJ Commissioner 1=a responded in the asked proced` rally if the City Council hears this request twice. Planner Aaker pative. Council_ hears the request for preliminary and final. Commissioner Carr questioned if tf e project were approved would the applicant be able to build houses on the lots without variances: Planner Aaker said the applicant indicated houses could be built without variances from the zoning ordinance. Chair Staunton asked Planner Aaker if the statistics were driven by the 500 -foot neighborhood, adding it seems like a large lot area variance is needed. Aaker agreed the lot area variance appears large; adding variances from the subdivision ordinance would be required. Commissioner Platteter asked for clarification on if the new houses would meet the zoning ordinance. Aaker reiterated the applicant did not indicate further variances would be needed. Page 3 of 15 Applicant Presentation Rodney Helm addressed the Commission informing them he is representing the Shanight's, property owners. Helm reported he was the agent that presented the Kiser Addition subdivision at 5633 Tracy, adding he is familiar with this neighborhood. Helm said if one looks at the 500 -foot neighborhood it appears to be two separate neighborhoods -west of Tracy and east of Tracy. Helm explained the reasons for the variances to the subdivision ordinance result from the fact when calculating the 500 -foot neighborhood both "neighborhoods" were included. Continuing, Helm said in his opinion this division would help create a strong corner for Hawkes Terrace. He said the existing home is an outdated four level home without much architectural value. Helm further stated;tt`at:he believes retaining the driveway access off Tracy Avenue for both properties makes the,most sense with less disruption to the site and neighbors. He also added close attention was and willbe; aid to the existing conditions on the site, including the grade and vegetation and of course vehicl6,access: Concluding, Helm acknowledged that the subdivisiori`niisses all three media'"i �,equirements; width, area and depth; however, he believes the attention paid.tgthe redevelopment ofthis,site (topography, vegetation) will be a benefit to the neighborhood and E ipa.:..; 4 Commissioner Carpenter asked Mr. Helm;vi hqe the drive 6y access is for the homes directly across the street. Helm responded that he believes toth;peoperties access` Hawkes. Helm said the proposed access off Tracy for the new lots really help'set up'; the;site for a ggod, redevelopment. Chair Staunton opened th6liLiblithearing. Public Hearings??> 44 a•\ Tim Laughlin, 5705 Hawkes Terrace informed the Commission he lives directly across the street from the subject site; Laughlin staffed he'has lived in tfiIs neighborhood for many years, adding this corner worked, for him all these =years; however he can be agreeable to the proposed subdivision as submitted especially since the lots would be accessetl:off Tracy Avenue, not Hawkes Terrace. Terry Rocheford`,; 5604 Hawkes Terrace, told the Commission she doesn't have an issue with the subdivision; however wants assurances the access will be off Tracy Avenue. Rocheford said she has additional concerns atiout,parking`oWthe street and clear view when leaving Hawkes Terrace onto Tracy. Concluding, Rocheford ask. ed;the; applicant to police the site and keep the tall grass mowed. Chair Staunton asked if anyon`e-else would like to speak to the issue; being none Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Potts stated in his opinion this is a reasonable request adding he appreciates that the applicant paid close attention to the topography and vegetation when designing the plat. Page 4 of 15 Commissioner Carpenter stated he too feels the proposed subdivision is sensitive to the environment; however, he is somewhat concerned with the sight lines at the corner as expressed by Ms. Rocheford. Carpenter stated he wants assurances that house placement and topography are carefully assessed to ensure clear view in maintained. Commissioner Platteter commented that he likes how the developer is working with the land, adding in his opinion the shared driveway is a great option. If done as depicted it should create a good plat. Commissioner Carr stated she has no additional comments. Commissioner Forrest commented that it may be possible this si e;is:orie lot because of the terrain. She also expressed concern that any redevelopment of this lot would impact the urban canopy. Forrest encouraged the builder to be in contact with the neighbors :d' ing t pristruction process. Chair Staunton said he had an initial concern with t variance; however, understands differing neighbo'l Staunton stated he also has a strong preference fo indicated on the plans. He further suggested the pi to ensure greater visibility. Motion Commissioner Potts moved to.recommend 'pi findings and subject to staff.0nditions. Corn aye; motion carried. B. 'best because of`the magnitude of the lot area can play a role in skewing the numbers. �`� ,\ riveway access to remainroff Tracy Avenue as ty of Urn itng parking to o ide of the street proval with variances based on staff ter seconded the motion. All voted Edina Fifty Five, LLC. 5109 -5125 49`h Street Planner Aaker info'r"med` the Comsion Hun s ciates are requesting final review of the redevelopment of three1ots located at 5109 -51 West 49th Street. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two spar" fi single f ily ome on the site) and build a new 16 -unit attached housing development. The s eject properties tal 1.4 cres in size; therefore, the proposed density of the project would be 11 units per acre. Conti uing, Aaker ted the applicant received preliminary rezoning and plan approval of this project o April 16, 2013. Aaker reported in order to obtain to a 01 rovals for the projec the following is the final step . required for approval; Final Develop m t Plan and Final Rezoning t UD and Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. Page 5 of 15 49SN��r� 0 e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 24, 2013 VI.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Rodney Helm on behalf of Tom and Gretchen Shanight is proposing to subdivide the property at 5612 Tracy Avenue into two lots. (See property location on pages Al —A3.) The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4 —A16.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; and 2. Lot width variances from 80.7 feet to 80 feet for each lot; lot depth variances from 157 feet to 122 feet; and lot area variances from 17,651 square feet to 9,820 square feet. Both lots would gain access off Tracy Avenue by a shared driveway, utilizing the existing driveway to the site. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is. 17,651 square feet, median lot depth is 157 feet, and the median lot width is 80.7. (See attached median calculations on pages A7 —A10.) This is a neighborhood with varrying lot sizes. Larger lots to the north across Vernon and to the east across Tracy Avenue have established the large minimum lot sizes for this property. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property in the same manner as the existing lots on the west side of Tracy Avenue. (See pages A2— A3 & Al7 —A19.) A subdivision with similar circumstances was recently approved in this area at 5633 Tracy Avenue by the applicant. (See attached plans and minutes from the Planning Commission and City Council meetings on pages A20 —A26.) Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are single - family homes, zoned and guided low- density residential. (See page A3.) Existing Site Features The existing site is a corner lot, contains a single - family home and attached garage. The lot is oversized compared to surround lots, contains mature trees, and relatively steep slopes along Hawkes Terrace. (See page A3.) Access to site is from Tracy Avenue. The single - .family home would be removed. Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single- dwelling residential R -1, Single- dwelling district * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally acceptable. Adequate drainage and utility easements are proposed along all the lot lines. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. The grading plan shows the buildable area for Lot 1 with a 15 foot setback off of Tracy Avenue. (See page Al 5.) The required setback is 35 feet, to match the setback of the home to the north. If this subdivision is approved, it would not approve a building pad for a 15 -foot setback. However, as indicated on page A15, there still would be adequate building area for a new home. There would be a building pad of 39 feet by 65 feet or 2,535 square feet. Park Dedication As with all subdivision proposals, park dedication is required. Edina City Code requires a park dedication fee of $5,000 for each additional lot created. Therefore a park dedication fee of $5,000 would be required. 2 Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 17,651 s.f. 80.7 feet 157 feet Lot 1 9,820 s.f.* 80 feet* 122 feet* Lot 2 9,820 s.f.* 80 feet* 122 feet* * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally acceptable. Adequate drainage and utility easements are proposed along all the lot lines. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. The grading plan shows the buildable area for Lot 1 with a 15 foot setback off of Tracy Avenue. (See page Al 5.) The required setback is 35 feet, to match the setback of the home to the north. If this subdivision is approved, it would not approve a building pad for a 15 -foot setback. However, as indicated on page A15, there still would be adequate building area for a new home. There would be a building pad of 39 feet by 65 feet or 2,535 square feet. Park Dedication As with all subdivision proposals, park dedication is required. Edina City Code requires a park dedication fee of $5,000 for each additional lot created. Therefore a park dedication fee of $5,000 would be required. 2 Primary Issue • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a variance are met with this proposal. Per state law and the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is due to the fact that the subject property is double the size of all lots on this block. This block was originally plated with lots similar in size to those proposed with this subdivision, with the exception of the subject property. (See page A2.) The lot width and depth requirements are due to wider and deeper lots further away from the subject property, and primarily east of Tracy Avenue. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate. area. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood and original plat. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of his property of which the lots would be the same as existing lots in the area. (See pages A17 —A19, which show lots area, lot width and lot depths in that immediate neighborhood.) The applicant is proposing to preserve the slopes and vegetation along Hawkes Terrace, which includes Black Walnut trees, by using the existing driveway off of Tracy Avenue to gain access to both lots; rather than cut in two new driveways off of Hawkes Terrace. Access off of a local street and not Tracy Avenue, which is a much busier roadway, would typically be required, as it would normally be a safer entrance to the properties.. However, in this instance, given the benefit of preserving the slopes, vegetation and mature trees, staff would recommend the shared driveway. The city engineer has reviewed the proposed access and would be agreeable. (See page A20.) An easement must be established over Lot 1 granting an access easement for Lot 2. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? The condition of this oversized lot is unique to the west side of Tracy Avenue on this block. All the lots on the west side of Tracy Avenue, north of Hawkes Drive are similar in size to the two proposed lots. The circumstance of the oversized lot was not created by the applicant. C) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The neighborhood includes a vast majority of single - family homes on similar sized lots as proposed. The applicant proposes not to disturb the character along Hawkes Terrace, by utilizing the existing driveway off of Tracy Avenue to access both lots. (See page Al 5.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of . 5612 Tracy Avenue; lot width variances from 80.7 feet to 80 feet for each lot; lot depth variances from 157 feet to 122 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 17,651 square feet to 9,820 square feet. Approval is based on the following findings: Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block on the west side of Tracy Avenue north of Hawkes Drive. 3. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. 4. The 9,820 square foot lots are larger than the general standard minimum lot area of 9,000 square feet. 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 4 a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is roughly two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the blocks north of Hawkes Drive and west of Tracy Avenue. C. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80 -foot wide, 9,000+ square foot lot, which is common to the area. Approval is subject to the following conditions: The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Park dedication fee of $5,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 3. Vehicle access to these lots shall be off of Tracy Avenue. 4. Compliance with the conditions required by the director of engineering in -his memo dated July 18, 2013. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. A private driveway easement established over Lot 1 to serve Lot 2 must be filed with Hennepin County. Deadline for a City Decision: October 1, 2013 C. City of Edina qa 3301 5500 3501 5600 5301 5300 5501 5717 5709 5413 5308 Legend _ Highlighted feature 5305 5504 5505 5504 5505 5504 �� 5304 5300 3417 5312 Surrounding House Number 5505 5508 5885 Labels 5509 r' 5509 3506 5309 5512 � 9508 3509 3512 3321 3316 � 551] 5513 S312 � 5516 5301 5320 House Number Labels Street Name Labels 5313 �y 5552 5316 5513 5301 5517 $317 sirs 3305 V City Limits /" 3317 Ssfe $510 5521 3517 5320 5504 24 �,- Creeks 5521 SSIp 3321 55X! 3327 3514 3300 SM 5506 Garden Park Lake Names 7524 3323 5525 5508 5509 j -_ —. Lakes 5543 3321 5529 5324 8325 5528 3513 5512 5313 5513 5308 3516 O Parks SS29 5526 SS2t 5528 557.7 5528 8518 5372 5517 $SiT 6516 5512 pY 5517 ty Py4S Parcels 3513 5533 5572 5531 3531 5516 A �{ 5521 •' 5577 3532 36.73 5376 5129 3328 S92f 3532 3601 5937 5536 3511 5536 ty` novcasrat war 3600 Se09 14 pr(tjpt'3 =1iD 9 5601 6601 5606 5540 5600 '`604 5601 5600 5600 1661 3600 1803 3lzS s72r sn75717 5605 3604 3604 5603 7664 3806 5613 s900 / s606 3609 3609 5606 se66 M12 SIM l ' 24 5613 71Will; 5612:% 5615 1612 351635iz 7l08 Sofa L161 5586 (yt5`8808177 5 24 5729 `5802 802 gA l r i 24 804 5807 Hawked Lk. _ ` i 5725 HAY19rE3792 5712 3703 3761 $e17 7616 5621 5620 s303 RG6EPARKHD 5500 5609 5517. 5505 It 3313 4 S60R t / 17 5814 6�SSH 5721 5704 015700 9825 5624 ° 5626 8028 5113 3377 7521 5621 SS}i 3617 j /\ ^ Sal 5620 0815 % 57/7 NAW(ESOR 5633 96J2 6523 i 5621 552620 55 7 SitT S804 5629 57fI 06 073701 5636 11 j 24 7808 R 0 65]3 3801 5701 X165 5816 5605 5704 17043 5618:5612 3606 360436/0 32 353 5341 5900 5069 5700 3705 5730 l8f7 5549 381 5704 5.'08 5775 Ss1l 3606 7603 3700 21 I4 5821 5709 Si OS $703 ; 5901 STOB 5828 5e14 1712 5711 5716 5616 S61t 1686 5604 3600 21 3304 3300 70 54 5706 rbn PaA Ado ' S8 5720 Ss3fi 5832 $820 ¢ S9 5616 5716 $ 5801 u rs7 W "• SBT2 S7I0 3712 5708 ¢ 5401 5800 ~ 3817 5600 3605 Soot S'J21 5515 3509 330 S12S 583738373619 8il 5821.,56/7 5805 5801 5603 6641 T3604 j r W 3020 5616 3800 5806 5888 438013721371 57775706 J7053701 3608 5806 5820 3816 5817 SH2 5603 21 3808 �� 5806 5673 A�DH 5801 5605 5604 rw �+�rn -a1s.c r<sa,c:::x:::�an �n 5804 5817 3804 L11E LW PID: 3211721130060 ° 5612 Tracy Ave " ' tie L Edina, MN 55436 '•� <ru1 . u1t9• 5520 5601 5521 5524 5509 5509 5508 5604 5601 5525 5600 5608 5721 5717 5508 5604 5604 ti 5616 5513 5513 5605 5524 5525 5528 5624 5512 5529 n 5632 5512 5528 5612 5608 5517 5517 5516 5529 5532 5533 5609 M }' 5516 5533 5536 5532 5537 5525 5520 5521 5532 24 STER WAY 5708 i 5612 X DONGA pUNp�� WARDEN A VE ?GSi 5601 5605 5609 5516 IWCE PARK RO 551 p 5613 2 5677 a 5621 5528 5532 5601 VERNON AVE S 5605 5604 5601 5600 5600 5608 5721 5717 5713 5604 5604 ti 5616 5621 5605 5620 5625 5624 5629 5628 n 5632 5636 5616 5612 5608 5608 A 5609 M 24 5708 i 5612 X 5613 5710 " HAWKES TER 5729 24 Hawkes Lake 5712 5705 5701 5725 5706 i . 5721 5704 5700 HAWKES DR 5717 .•,.. .\ 5713 5629 5705 5701 5709 i 5701 - 5708 5704 5700 U�ccr lui:�hctVS.C��t.!Cy LOGl5 GG2D5 - WARDEN A VE ?GSi 5601 5605 5609 5516 IWCE PARK RO 551 p 5613 2 5677 a 5621 5528 5532 5601 5600 5605 5604 5609 5608 5615 5612 5617 5616 5621 5620 5625 5624 5629 5628 5633 5632 5636 5616 5612 5608 5604 5640 WARDEN A VE ?GSi 5601 5605 5609 5516 IWCE PARK RO 551 p 5613 2 5677 a 5621 5528 5532 A 5612 Tracy Subdivision: Explanation of Request 5612 Tracy Avenue is an oversized parcel that appears to be better suited as two parcels facing Hawkes Terrace. There currently is a single family dwelling on the site and a detached garage. The dwelling is in need of major renovation. Given the condition of the home, the break -up of value of the site has a much greater economic value than the single home /single site current configuration. The proposed sites do not match the current zoning requirements for individual sites in lot median width and depth. Review of the plat and 500' radius surrounding neighborhood plats, it appears that original plat was meant to be two sites. Detailed answers to the variance questions are provided later in this application. .��XQ�� �a Al� 5612 Tracy Subdivision: Explanation of Request 5612 Tracy Avenue represents a double parcel on the corner of Hawkes Terrace and Tracy Avenue. The remaining housing on Hawkes Terrace front Hawkes Terrace. There currently is a single family dwelling on the site and a detached garage. The dwelling is in need of major renovation. Given the condition of the home, the break -up of value of the site has a much greater economic value than the.single home /single site current configuration. Also, the subject property.is somewhat of an outlier, sitting back on its site and facing Tracy. This subdivision requests separating the 160.1 by 122.75 foot lot, currently fronting Tracy on the 122.75 dimension, into two, lots fronting Hawkes with 80 and 80.1 frontage. The south side of the site, which would be the Hawkes frontage, does have a rise and trees. The sites could either have (1) south side driveway egress to Hawkes with tuck under gararge for the westerly site and optional egress to either Hawkes or Tracy at current curb cut for the easterly site or (2) create an easement access across east site from Tracy to the west site allowing rise and trees to be kept and retaining only one curb cut on Tracy. Plats were drawn as #1 option. We can have redrawn to #2 option, but that might be best left to the building permit process later. C\ �1) Attachment A: 5612 Tracy Variance Responses: The proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties in compl ying With the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable: YES. The 500' neighborhood creates two practical difficulties, one relating to the lot width and the other to the lot depth. First, with regards to the lot width of the proposed sites, the proposed sites will be just under the median, which for ordinance purposes, requires variance. Of the 63 sites in the neighborhood, 21 sites lie within 6 inches of width of the proposed sites (reference attachment B). Due to the original platting, a number of sites are pie- shaped.' Width is determined with a 50' setback into the sites. The result is that these pie- shaped create a greater width value than measured at the street, as would be the case for a standard rectangular platted neighborhood where lot width is lot width. This has skewed the median upwards some, pushing a number of conforming width lots (over 75' width), 31 of 32 that fall below the median, into non- conformance. With regards to depth, the 500' neighborhood really consists of two property types, those with more of a standard lot depth of 120 -140', and those with excessive lot depths, 200; and over. These groups represent 20 and 27 of the properties in the 62 property set respectively. See attachment C. Because of these two separate groups of properties, and their relative distribution of property, the median for this particular neighborhood has been skewed upwards forcing a number of the more standardized lots to be in nonconformance with the median rule. Further, when looking at Hawkes Terrance specifically, the lot depth of the proposed sites match up directly with the remaining sites on the northside of street. 2) Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district: YES. Of the 63 property set in the defined neighborhood, the only other parcel that is double sized in nature is 5633 Tracy, which just received subdivision approval this past spring. No other sites are situated in such a way that would allow two 80' frontage lots. Further, by review of the 500' neighborhood platting, the subject site appears to have belonged to Hawkes Terrace from a livability standpoint, since it represents approximately two times the site directly to the west. 3) Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance: YES. The proposed sites meet minimum lot width of the zoning area (75'). The depth of the lot matches the site directly to the west. With regards to the intent or spirit of the ordinance, the proposed sites offer approximately the same site offering as a number of the neighboring sites. As referenced above, in the general field of properties in the 500' radius, the sites are really grouped in two categories, excessively deep lots and standard lots. I have highlighted this fact on attachment C. Note that of the 63 defined neighborhood homes, 20 of them range from 120 -140' creating a more standard category, while there is another grouping of much larger property, 27 in count, that have depth in excess of 200' Again, this really creates two groups of property. The Hawkes Terrace properties tend to be more standard sized and match more directly against the proposed sites. 4) Not alter the essential Character of the neighborhood: YES. Looking directly at the Hawkes sites, the new proposed sites more directly reflect those sites. Also, by changing the frontage of the subject into two frontages on Hawkes, the neighborhood character of that street will only be enhanced, feeling more consistent with itself. This subject, in its current state, is somewhat disconnected with both Tracy Avenue and Hawkes Terrace. Subdivision of this site will provide greater consistency for Hawkes Terrace. /�N 5532 5533 csm 5525 55: — 551. 5532 tai W 51 y 548 � 552y tc3_ c `510 5533 541;5 ,723 5737 S7)3 W. s 56,4-4 5604 5605 5604 n 56D9 5065 5c06 56149 we 5516 5532 5533 csm 5525 55: 5537 - 1521 5532 tai 5601 5E -01 r S.�OI s6fA 541;5 ,723 5737 S7)3 W. s 56,4-4 5604 5605 5604 56D9 5065 5c06 56149 we 24 5613 5730 5708 5311 501 . 5612._.. 5516 551: - - H ti•Mkt ti ILK 5617 5616 RIDGE -FARO RC - 5712 `oll 5620 5705 5741 SSL) SSC 5725 LAKE -- 545 5u24 5768 _721 57u4 7700 5629 5629 su 7 HAWLLS DR a _Fi: Attachment B, Shanight Addition: Sorted By width, Raw date collected from Surveyors numbers Lot No Length 39 0 0 32 68.5 121.8 9 75 247 12 75 224 19 75 300 20 75 300 21 75 300 22 75 230 23 75 157 31 75 155 33 75 121.8 34 75 135 30 76 155 49 76 140 24 137 27 136 28 8 217.5 29 8 217.5 35 8 200 36 8 200 37 8 295 38 3 295 42 8 247.5 43 8 247.5 51 8 135 52 80 217.5 53 86, 247.5 62 80.5 232.5 63 80.5_. 232.5 41 80` 232.5 40 80 232.5 44 80 232.5 45 80: 232.5 46 232.5 47 232.5 10 82 217.5 50 83 165 58 83 248 11 84 155 18 85 125 25 85 135.7 26 85 136 60 85 125 55 86 140 56 86 140 15 90 130 17 90 125 54 93 161 59 93 130 61 93 130 57 98 130 16 100 125 14 103 125 13 110 235 2 112 150 7 112 150 1 120 157 3 120 150 5 120 153 8 120 150 48 125 224 6 135 148 J 150 190 median 80.7 157 average 87.04127 183.96508 NOTE: 21 sites out of 63 are within 0.7 Ft width of proposed sites Attachment C, Shanight Addition: Sorted by lot depth Raw date collected from Surveyors numbers Lot No Width Depth 39 0 0 32 68.5 33 75 14 103 125 16 100 125 17 90 125 18 85 125 60 85 125 15 90 130 57 98 130 59 93 130 61 93 130 34 75 135 51 80 135 25 85 135.7 26 85 136 27 80 136 24 80 137 49 76 140 55 86 190 56 86 140 6 135 148 2 112 150 3 120 150 7 112 150 8 120 I50 5 120 153 11 84 155 30 76 155 31 75 155 1 120 157 23 75 157 54 93 161 50 83 165 4 150 190 35 80 36 80 206 10 82 217.5 28 80 2175 29 80 217.5 52 80 217 5 12 75 22 1 48 125 224 22 75 230 40 80.7 2325 41 80.6 232.5 44 80.7 232.5 45 80.7 232.5 46 80.7 232.5 47 80.7 232.5 62 80.5 232.5 63 80.5 232.5 13 110 235 9 75 247 42 80 247.5 43 80 247.5 53 80 2.47.5 58 83 248 37 80 295 38 80 295 19 75 300 20 75 300 21 75 80.7 157 87.04127 183.96508 NOTE: Sites are primary in two groups, small sites, 120 -140 lengths, and large sites 200 +. General data set becomes very diverse because of this causing a very high median and average. This has forced a lot of the sites to be quite a bit under median. 41 Attachment A, Shanight Addition: Raw date collected from Surveyors numbers Lot No Width Length 1 120 157 2 112 150 3 120 150 4 150 190 5 120 153 6 135 148 7 112 150 8 120 150 9 75 247 10 82 217.5 ll 84 155 12 75 224 13 110 235 14 iO3 125 15 90 130 16 100 _ 125 17 90 125 18 85 125 19 75 300 20 75 300 21 75 300 22 75 230 23 75 157 24 80 137 25 85 135.7 26 85 136 27 '80 136 28 80 217.5 29 80 217.5 30 76 155 31 75 155 32 68.5 121.8 33 75 121.8 34 75 135 35 80 200 36 80 200 37 80 295 38 80 295 39 0 0 40 80.7 232.5 41 80.6 232.5 42 80 247.5 43 80 247.5 44 80.7 232.5 45 80.7 232.5 46 80.7 232.5 47 80.7 232.5 _ 48 125 224 49 76 140 50 83, 165 51 80 135 52 80 217.5 53 80 247.5 54 93 161 55 86 140 56 86 140 57 98 130 58 83 248 59 93 130 60 85 125 61 93 130 62 80.5 232.5 63 80.5 232.5 median 80.7 157 average 87.04127 183.96508 A[ 6 + SCALE lu FEEr 0 20 40 60 EEd55436 NDTIONS SURVEY FOR: en Shanight NOTES: Endw rS`a•o. um °.•bl iouw••dnopwr • 5e5,. q.n N•5 ctrl ,w. novco5S5e dxa.. ar da�LZmwbo°�". w're Legal Description TR 17. tool°r AVn160 fmorr.db y, We Ib0 fui ar We NaWIWr d aei i. ww6orr Acars. n�m.� caw, - EXISTING CONDITIONS SHANIGHT ADDITION For. Tom & Gretchen Shanight 5612 Tracy A- Edlan, MN 55476 CERTIFICATION in• odr••••mmu w•. w � Wu•i •wa •.rgm•um pmxs ercw 4"0 rn �•� uu drvtiWO�. LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LANG SURVEYORS Sheet I of 5 + I I I I I I I I I I i S 89'27'29' E 160.01 I J I 9 ID y I Q I :• ItCEID - -_ -io -- ---- -- - - -_ - -_ — HAWKES TERRACE ------------------------------ f Zf SCALE lu FEEr 0 20 40 60 EEd55436 NDTIONS SURVEY FOR: en Shanight NOTES: Endw rS`a•o. um °.•bl iouw••dnopwr • 5e5,. q.n N•5 ctrl ,w. novco5S5e dxa.. ar da�LZmwbo°�". w're Legal Description TR 17. tool°r AVn160 fmorr.db y, We Ib0 fui ar We NaWIWr d aei i. ww6orr Acars. n�m.� caw, - EXISTING CONDITIONS SHANIGHT ADDITION For. Tom & Gretchen Shanight 5612 Tracy A- Edlan, MN 55476 CERTIFICATION in• odr••••mmu w•. w � Wu•i •wa •.rgm•um pmxs ercw 4"0 rn �•� uu drvtiWO�. LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. LANG SURVEYORS Sheet I of 5 + PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR: LIM Tom �&:Gretchen Shanight 56' 2 Tracy A- [Edl- MEN 55436 11 NOTES: M=t T.W aaad 1­y • -1 1.1 PA5 eel. 1111 snanplu Legal Description S.,i. I -- 160 15.1-16— No --N—Ilif dlm 7. ­ PRELIMINARY PLAT SHANIGHT ADDITION For. Tom & Gretched Shanight 5612 Tracy A- Edlan. MN 55436 FFc- FI-TI.N LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. S - ------------ - 1 -- ---------- -j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - Z� N ao L 0 T 2 L 0 'T 1 ---------- �j ------------------------------- : S 89-27'29- E 160.01 HAWKE5 TERRACE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PROP05CV UrIUTY i DRAINAGE EA5CMENT5 ARE 5HOM THU5: SCALE IN I'M 20 40 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR: LIM Tom �&:Gretchen Shanight 56' 2 Tracy A- [Edl- MEN 55436 11 NOTES: M=t T.W aaad 1­y • -1 1.1 PA5 eel. 1111 snanplu Legal Description S.,i. I -- 160 15.1-16— No --N—Ilif dlm 7. ­ PRELIMINARY PLAT SHANIGHT ADDITION For. Tom & Gretched Shanight 5612 Tracy A- Edlan. MN 55436 FFc- FI-TI.N LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. HA WKE5 TERRACE ----------------------------- I C GRACING PLAN LOT KEY 11�1 ------------- Z 0:= no CONSTRUCTION NOTES 2. PWR TO C—T- 3. —TE—YE—I roa - TeGMSM OC ZS�1— t—,lettate Onc Call GOVERNING SPECIFICATONS lEGfNO SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 60 ALTERNATE K GRADING, DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND TREE PLAN Tom & Gretchen Shanight 5612 Tracy ,I Edha MN 55436 11 NOTES: I T— z' Legal Description ALTERNATE GRADING, DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND TREE PLAN SHANIGHT ADDITION For. TOM & Gretchen Shanight 5611 Tracy Ave. Ethan, MN 55436 FF-ER ZATIL). LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC. v4 vows 31— SITOGI, 5 of 5 i I I CONSTRUCTION NOTES - I I_- PxeR re EuuPwaR ro rm,r I................ 1. �s°6u w7.x x+` LE, Pxm—d IE�4�s`".cx a�INs �i .... S69-27-29- RoDxEDxS R aTID A nE55EaR51TEA<DE55. • E 160Dv c ec '•'- I. __ __ _ ___ D w . s 2911114— _ ,, I _ 2 1 l ` �� Gophcr State One Call I j U "1 r j is jam, w 2 I GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS a o ` ru 8 'ru ,w I Q I� w„ Iwmnmwv,. II (FFE= 926.7) h (FFE,t+= -Yy929. 0); � 1° - T•, I x. III iv ww ena,x.rs il L eeceNn �— — •— • —• —•— — �� • —.L. -sue. — .— ,— ._. —,� - — - -- 1 0 O�Wa.a HA WK ES TERRACE ii y y0- •� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — x I s••- rs...e j I 9Li iFHCE Px xxcsmu xo<x E11 xDD>ax 5,.E I � TINE ®,ri �� vow. ua • -- rew i i GKADING PLAN LOT KEY P.. ,. , b. u'�..a:.'uur"�� � n,w oma. u+.+.•. w+•r...,..,a O e 17.1" rtx ...,,.m a nE u•.cnn,,. m xm re „wc ,�xnr O ..y e�.+m ••••s•••,•••n�. s,xeer SCALE IN FEE! 0 2u 46 oe GRADING, DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND TREE PLAN Tom & Gretchen Shanight 5612 Tracy Ave. Edina. MN 55436 NOTES: EA,u.O m.W cla „uke - w11... o.cuS UM N,inn, m Wxam,x nnmrrv..- R- I(sho. o... In,x oxmal a.5uw's �. S.=— �4hl (I, I.., 1-1—.1.4--.1.1 Legal Description TI,. S.al, I foal of iJe Gvt I60 !<a of bl b wd N16u I60 rm ofJ¢ Nonli aal! GRADING, DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND TREE PLAN SHANIGHT ADDITION For. Tom & Gretchen Shanight 5512 Tracy Ave. Edian, MN 55436 CERTIFICATION ,= 50...: LOT SURVEYS COMPANYY, INC. NO SURVEYORS OROOxLrn PMI(Mry 551]8 Sheet 4 of 5 + r- L -J L�J L�J \I ti � 1 .1 1 � 1 `r\ ��J L \- 12" 1 .♦ I I! r% 1 r% !♦ r- A r\ r\ A l K J It-IJ h( /1 11 -I I- - !I 1 I/ JI \f p JV V� I 60 I \ ♦I I I L- I 1 I L/ ♦I L- / IL L/ I • . I tf 1 I i peak 5606 928.5 945.4 KO 0-5 I Residence 9z 9 N No. 560 cor \ 3I 924.3 I 923.6 9'3.7 I 922.5 wOo fence S 89 027'29" E 169.01 0 34`: ' I - u1 'Power POIe 1 - �- 80 - - -- 5outh true of Lot 6 - 80 0- 1 Iwr 8 'N - - i �- - - - -7 - - - - Driveway EaTement p - -i - Iri 11 °. I 924 �` \ 2 i i 1 24.4 i; 6" rsfer I ! I I I _92_4. 924. i d a � I I v t0 O N \ I I I 9\25.0 � � 1 w I I , 22.2 I I 1 ti I 1 1 I I` 4 m# I I u- I .I 1 I I` t I N I I -925 lI �I/ C� \ l LU I I t O 22 tl Lvj I j \ \ t \ J I cY I' i7 IOreve. yree 6 °0 9201 11 i i 1 1 I04 I / 23.2 I N I � I Ia I r I N 11 J v P m s- o h I to O I r I I II ..� � %eer' z 1 01-"f = 926.7) �I I 925.0 8 evergre , (FE = 926 -'1122.,5 LU I/\ . I r 1 t2r?I e 1 I 921.4 I I I n� -120 32113 1` g � T ON N I CD sanliary �ervrce 9,3.3 ` Water 5eMCe I ,------ --- -__ I I 23.r I 929. .9;3-1 J1 ) I I __ I 40 .ma re ` n 923.9 --I -___ __� • -- _ _ _ _ Ij i � f S) Al Poi t' tr- - ~_ - -__— __= 20.5 - - -� I \- - - - - - - - I L - - - -_ - - -� . I _ 1c - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - _ -9 +3- -80:0 - - 97 -- - - - 976'7 _ _ _ - ------ - - _22 t�ez - - _ / - �i7�- - - - - - ' _ - - - - - - _ - 9r�- 24t 1 Ovhe Jvi s' 5?O 916.6 ! _ - o f Ynr - wu 9n{,Q.BB uv _ Wu _� wu - w, 9� 9 / 2.T :or,crete curb ro 914:00 19 u:... 915 ti,9 li 11 J v P m s- evergreen ?2.5 � � V U U k Lbvt b 91 Wu - - Wu - wu wu 1. 3I i �I n� UQ N �1 sanliary �ervrce Water 5eMCe u - WM - Wu WM - evergreen ?2.5 � � V U U k Lbvt b 91 Wu - - Wu - wu wu 1. 1 i' ;E m 91V K r r>�r rrrr rr�r- /I r rr rr�r ir�rr r r. ♦i r r a._ r l r ci v r__ i —I L i I r ■, i_ r r r.i �R V, a� . Residence �> >r ti r NO 5781 !Nest hne of the East 160 feet of Lot 7 t 6 ' 0 °4224 "E 122.75 N VO chain Gnu k fence t Ft I all l I ,II I iI i I ;R , I! Ik I I III, I I tie 25 I F A j I { I I U <2 -� CO `x- pa III I � I ' I g'I ��- , � �. rh v wray ! to ° Irt I N rT1 I`� n -rte .L, >- �c I� ` -r -� -� -N��00 °02'24 "7122.75 = = =- '' I I! L -- I m II 1 (-- -Ire - - - -, — - - - - - -- ------------------ I- -- �,p I I rD 11 ve1(way j �� t i b I I o� A I I I r a 0� 11 In �- I ! I I II J O 11 I�, ` , � Il 25 c�I I o r �" O N v, N I I, NU io I I Ca3 , --I, -ZZZ* � I v i� --324-@ lrTi� -1915— — -- - - - - -- - -� i a — / overhead wires_ —w -- -w —w —w 92t N 00° 2 4 " E 122.5 _ _ = ��r-. z- = _ i:: _ - A r ♦ I rote 9 • `' R B6 -60 concrete rb C9 N R ? A O rb n Iry 5601 3,3a�- • : =i13 5605 I j J-7"1 5609 12;OoL 2d 5613 5 5725 i 5721 s s 9H7 Hawkes Lake t 57t3 a ,: < <•.,.�•� •, : n�n� s c�r:yr;e; _�;s sus �ws V--NON AVE S 5600 5600 5601 11,G1.��1 5604 5604 5605 � 1 4G'sd �I,•»4 5608 5608 M 6609 LIT,7°�/� 11, 411 STAB 5710 3617 14A VWWS/}TER let4 1 ` { IO16Ia, `621 5112 5705 5701 `:625 5708 " STOd 'r J HA WKE`_� _ F. ��7 5633 5705 5709 ��7 5633 *77 1 5713 24 5613 5725 5721 i 5111 Hawkestaka 5713 1 ;d�-•sKada;:';A 111S- CWj":q•c i`= S-P -;9 G;5 ?:u`. 5600 - l 5664 -76 Ih j h 58178 -7 S 5708 571d NA VINES TER 5709 1 f kY..�OR 5?05 5701 k (I 5617 5621 5625 5629 5633 Le ( w i.DTtf VERNON AVE S 5601 5600 7 5604 5665 to 7S was 5609 g0 5600 - l 5664 -76 Ih j h 58178 -7 S 5708 571d NA VINES TER 5709 1 f kY..�OR 5?05 5701 k (I 5617 5621 5625 5629 5633 Le ( w i.DTtf 5725 5721 + S71T HawkasEnka i 5713 s :I.0 c¢uoix�:9A Uf15C ,,-..yri =i i43SGL'd}i5 VSWQVAVE s 5600 5604 IBS 5608 i 35' 5710 5708 HA WKES TER 5600 ISS 5604 A 5608 M ISIS' ax 570+9 HAWKES DR 5705 :/ a AM 5601 $605 sm 5613 soli 8621 5625 �C2) DoT d E PTA} S 5713 5601 5605 5609 24 5613 5725 5721 + S71T HawkasEnka i 5713 s :I.0 c¢uoix�:9A Uf15C ,,-..yri =i i43SGL'd}i5 VSWQVAVE s 5600 5604 IBS 5608 i 35' 5710 5708 HA WKES TER 5600 ISS 5604 A 5608 M ISIS' ax 570+9 HAWKES DR 5705 :/ a AM 5601 $605 sm 5613 soli 8621 5625 �C2) DoT d E PTA} S ffol 160 City of Edina - � - -- - 5301 5900 $501 SS00 5301 5700 5501 5713 3101 8413 5308 Legend a :CI Highlighted feature 5507 3303 5705 3901 5505 $504 5� 5SM 5304 3500 "IT 5508 5172 _ SurrauMli House Number ng Labels 3509 W512 k� 3 55 5708 15TJ 5513 SW !1so 5512 5421 5601 5316 5320 House Number Labels y 5512 5513 5316 5513 5516 5301 Street Name labels 5517 5517 5517 7576 5507 ./ Clty Limits /,."� 5516 5528 s521 3717 5720 $504 to Creeks 5521 3518 5311 5720 5527 _ 551 552A 5500 6301 8701 24 aerdenPrk f� lJ Lake Names 5714 �� 5508 SSOD �] Lakos 5123 S624 5329 55b 5324 5715 3316 5513 5513 6311 5313 3518 S50H � Parks 5518 5529 ! I Im 7526 5528 WS7 2 5517 $716 1" 5512 5517 0, 'OS Parcels 5333 3911 a 5533 5532 5537 1572 Sm ,537 3572 1573 6530 5323 SS20 5521 9532 5601 5532 6536 9341 8738 Q, DUYG137HV WAY Sw 9 24 DVMDF£RD 7671 5805 3540 600 5104 A SNOT SIM S600 560! Ji00 560.9 $7215717 5713 ,1885 7604 W04 Sm 6861 a 3601 5813 - 7800 5009 1808 5606 5807 5808 5609 111111 —24 –F 5801 �, l f j 26 5613 ..... r 570815612: ' WRI 9812 5817 3611 516 f2 S 3504 Safa 5501 5500 790 �� SW02 9 24 74 5720 z 5807 Hawkas, 7725 58 fei PIIW9 TER 5712 570S970f DRT 5620 RDC,E PARKRD 5 5513 508 305 8 S SSf j 617 j 5814 k 5721 6708 T6/ 00 5625 5624 0 A Sm 5621 5613 351 51I $514 3`ry 21 9617 1 $620 8829 5717 r fY.—DI 5W2 1633 i 3713 551 5529 5 N 29 � 1035701 24 j 24 F 2 \,Nf O 6/01 970} r , 5611 5812 56881WOd.5640 572 SS j ia1W 3708 3900 5�y 5700 7048700 SN1 j ' 774 3785 587 3730 S549 Sg 8704 5701 5115.5513 3800'5505 5700 24 N 5821 9981 8701 7 -5705 5712 ' 5703 E 24 ' 2 2H 59245/710 57/1 stirs 561xs6oe s6a shoo ssa ssro s43o 545 9700 r6on Par►Aad ' 8 2 5730 ¢ 7000 5816 5110 � 4804 v rn'e sr W Selz 5837 5833 5828 815 5821..17' s 720 7712 5780 SW01 33609 5600 5805 5001 5101 3511 5515 5309 8425 560flOWI / 543 5104 5 W 6120 5Bf6 Sd00 38010 5M/f 5721 71 571 57 W70S 5701 5609 3820 5176 Swe 9673 3012 N 5108 580 1F7. C i:l7 AMY DR 5804 � 8105 5804 � 5877 24 111 - TTIT Woowst.irM45.C.ryriCl: 1RG�"%IOi r+ 5609 Yffl .�� \ A. PID: 3211721130060 , 4 Pl o P 5612 Tracy Ave tiaL Edina, MN 55436 ffol 160 ' Lill . 60m _ roof peak I . ` 930.0 I - `�', I ''' ^".L.•at.:;..'• l -Story Frame '- - - - -- I _ _ - i •l' , portion ofsten '.I".;,I I.. °•eflo No.5629 , I CONSTRUCTION NOTES g 9 P border over tine_ 909.6 '•I:.. .. I.. .815.4 135 0L l \ ♦ 1. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CAU ° I w bas .•I I �tO 9/ - - 914.7 s I cootie to t \ , EXCAVATION. (DIAL 811) VIP. qq c ♦ , 1 S 89 °51'45" E 232SO \ 1 1 I 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO CON Inv7905.)a 9/ .6 1 ...•01 pX -- >__- -C -� -- ---- -� - - -\ \ -- - - - - -- - 3. PROTECT ANY EXISTING STREET C1 L. I Orlye wa - - - -- -- '_��-- �- - -- - -- - -- -I i -httyyp lei WITH INLET PROTECION DEVICES. / 9/5,6 �� ' j mh �! I 91163 L j b! I 8q, I 1 1 ' 9'4 _�� - - - - I I 4. AFTER EXISTING DRIVEWAY REMOV h ` 11 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ACCESS FOF I 'ry � cCfl O I 1 �r 'I " , 1 / 1 I 1 m u ♦ h I I ' • 01 I I I 1 w1 1 ���R ` �I I� ♦ I I � NTOREYW DIGI 915.9 4 Gopher S ta�tse w o.a I 916.0 twaclrcaREn sst muFlffamZ41t65 o �- manhole ` O T o HAWKE5 rim =911.50 Ln Inv= 891.38W,5 m ace I 370 1 / \ I ♦ I 1 I I 11 , / mv= 900.04N I+Y\ 1 I / .I / ♦ I ♦ I I I 13 / YZ: TERRACE 7 y x``� �� �� ♦ i , `\ ► ", 1` -' GOVERNING SPECIFIC PROPOSED 5ERVICE3 � I I � <g I , r F I 915.? uw ty F45emen I '.L• 1 1 ♦ :e I L �.v _� • /___________ 1 ♦x/6.1 I 1 1 / I 0 \ 1. The 2005 edition of the Minnesota De - - - - 1 0. I T C `- ----------- �.- - -J•�. ,r- - - - - -o -+ -ri --------- J-- - -1 - -I l Transportation ^Standard, Specificatior -� J -- \ S 89 5147 E 231.50 , , I LW \ 1 and the City of Edina's Specifications. I LQ 11 �• r _- '� - -Fr = _------------ ��-L-- -- I I -- y -_-' -- ��' - J - - -- I h 1� 2. The latest edition of the Minnesota Me, r�v way 1 I - - - - -- I l ---------- r-- -7 - - -I II1 I�..I Traffic control devices. L,, I I I 0 Z0I M I I 9.5� 'I - _ - I I h 3. The lates edition of the City Engineers. 01 I _ 1 1 Minnesota Standard 5 eclfications. `V 0; I II m F 91,16.0_ V I �h -1 I O 1 P (0 1 11 ♦__/ II l 3 m I I Q I v r 1 l udhty pole _s' I u) C m I /I. 914.9 / , w/anchor 1 0 I I `I� lu I // s I, I NI lJL,2 x I O I/ I / 1ypA b l ` LEGEND z�� 9Y5.6 I 5.3 i ', \ eT q' �, I I ♦ ♦ sy , Y edge of edgy g \// / 'v ,l 1 hatch basin 11 -- oe roro [ song C rou l nri2'_ 0��� / r I I r�.n =905.931 �`• ormeo P.°po3rt eo.t U mv= 903.07® 0 D-ot (- Monument,- ` y O I m r C - -� -� --------- - - -�`� - - -- /- --.1\y / I / 1\ ♦ / • Ga°tn lino Menumentl Fence �W -ham 1nw� ,W_W_ 19092 -_ mM C - - \ - • ._ - - -9ts7 - _89°5'.4' �I 1L 232rJQ - •P+�rh,-aa xmrs .,,vl,ry poles I nserl ovenread units u r Ewe ____ -_ -- - �i 910.2 Note: Additional block Nlal /s In this area - - _ - - - - ♦ - , I t o' B,s "" garage O MaMde \. .floor Frame r - - - - .- - 4 - - - - `♦ -x-x- fence 60 C' I 9i0! Garage 2211 - / . - w---w- 0-*-dw- 90,9 6 u 909.3x -� -� Storm 9cwa ♦ ♦ I G /' / 910.3 � I I jy - - - t'aeemellt tine ♦ ` ♦ ♦ / roo fP� I ' �..... Burlmng Lrle I 924.3 I 'tea' D-t- Pr I-d 0-0 h -39.0♦ I / - �•� aemees su.rxe w,ra•er top au ndad n roa peak I 910.2 sos.s 923.3 I l -Story Frame top feundadon ' senores G+shng r ro 1 -Story Frame I tap foundation No.56 / 2. I 910.6 No. 56 / 6 I 910.6 (house faces south) l - tory Frame y of 6wk .(house faces south) I No.5608 ^I ^ r,(house faces south) / I L_ L- I Y L- L- i -1 ! I I r -+ I Y ♦/ r 1 SILT FENCE _ INLET PROTECTION - SHEET INDEX e „ + / /�.ac ors, a�+n• �. w SM. . 2'X3' STORM STRUCTURE sh -E.w shoe, s - Pn:n rmrltr aT____mm+naac nt'IUS. ara ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE -- shec, 4•Drae �/ Sheet 3 -R•1 I D15rINC STORM NG � � - E. Subdivision. Kiser. 5633 Tracy Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser is proposing to subdivide the property at 5633 Tracy Avenue into two lots. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; and 2. Lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. Teague explained that both lots would gain access off Tracy Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 12,090 square feet, median lot depth is 136 feet, and. the median lot width is 85 feet. The new lots .would meet the median area and depth, but would be just short of the median width. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property in the same manner as the adjacent property to the east. Teague noted the condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to the Tracy Avenue area. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5633 Tracy Avenue and the lot width variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot area and depth, and nearly meet the median width. 3. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block of Tracy Avenue. 4. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. AaD 9 Approval is also subject to the following conditions: The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Tracy Avenue. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to- curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Appearing for the Applicant Rodney Helm on behalf of Miriam Kiser and Miriam Kiser, property owner. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify how lot sizes are determined; by the average or median. Planner Teague responded it's the median. Commissioner Scherer commented that if she read the plans correctly the requested subdivision would mirror exactly the lots to its east. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Applicant Presentation Mr. Helm addressed the Commission and introduced property owner and longtime Edina resident Miriam Kiser. Mr. Helm noted that within the 500 -foot neighborhood there are 77 data sets. 22 of the lots range between 80 — 81 feet in width and eleven are at 80 feet. Mr. Helm pointed out while lot width variances are required for each lot the lots will exceed the minimum lot width requirement of 75 -feet. Mr. Helm informed Commissioners that Tracy is a 1� 10 State road and the State indicated they have no issues with the subdivision as proposed. Helm also noted both lots are stubbed for water. Concluding, Mr. Helm asked the Commission for their support. Mrs. Kiser echoed that statement. Chair Staunton asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak to this issues; being none Commissioner Scherer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Forrest said she doesn't agree with staff that one of the practical difficulties is the oversized lot. She added in her opinion practical difficulties exist because the median lot width gets skewed by the adjoining properties; however she pointed out lot area and depth exceed the median. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved to recommend preliminary plat approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VIII. REPORTS,,,AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Zoning Ordina ce Update — Residential Deve ment —Ken Potts, Arlene Forrest and MiPlatteter Commissioner Platteter introduced d Com issioners Potts and Forrest reporting the three (at the request of the Commission) vo nteered late October early November to create a small "working group /subcommitte ' tackle the issues of residential redevelopment as it relates to Code issues and nst ction management. Platteter said their final goal would be to provide suggestio -/recomnrnendations to the'Planning Commission and City Council. Commissioners Platteter, orrest and Potts . ve a brief overview and with the aid of graphics indicated wher "we" were and where "we" are going. The following points were highlighted: Held two pu 9ic information gathering forums and evaluated input results. Presented o the Commission current zoning comparisons between Cities; noting that Edi "fell into" the more restrictive category. • As m 'tioned at the last Planning Commission meeting the themes of "concern" ,jen ap ear to fall into two categories; new /remodel, home size and lot modification 4aL� 11 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, vague, Swenson, Hi Motion carried. i V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS A ESEN V.A. FRANCE AVENUE PEDESTR HAN Engineer Houle provided an ate on e scheduled for construction m June to Sep related to right of wa acquisition, ongoing TIONS PROJECT — UPDATE PROVIDED France Avenue Pedestrian Enhancement Project that was -nber of 2013. Mr. Houle answered questions of the Council Nprk on urban design, and tying in to the existing bike infrastructure. 6 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD— Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH VARIANCES, RODNEY HELM ON BEHALF OF MIRIAM KISER, 5633 TRACY AVENUE —RESOLUTION NO. 2013-26 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Rodney Helm, on behalf of Miriam Kiser, to subdivide the property at 5633 Tracy Avenue into two lots. The existing home would be torn down and two new homes built on the new lots. To accommodate this request, a Preliminary Plat and Lot Width Variances from 85 feet to 80 feet for each lot would be required. Mr. Teague indicated in this neighborhood, median lot area was 12,090 square feet, median lot depth was 136 feet, and median lot width was 85 feet. The new lots would meet the median area and depth but would be just short of the median width. Mr. Teague stated both staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval as the findings for variance approval had been met. The Council asked questions of Mr. Teague relating to accommodation of storm water drainage, which would be addressed at the time of permit application. With regard to practical difficulty being tied to lot size, Mr. Teague noted if denied, this property owner would be denied a use that every other lot, including the lot to the east that was previously subdivided, had been granted. Proponent Presentation Miriam Kiser, proponent, stated she had lived at 5633 Tracy Avenue for 60 years. Rodney Helm, Burnet Realty and listing agent for Ms. Kiser, indicated staff had well summarized the request and neighbors had provided only positive responses. He noted the new lots would meet 155% of the median square footage and 171% of the median length. The Council encouraged Ms. Kiser to contact staff so an interview with the Historical Society could be scheduled to preserve the history of this property and the Kisers' original mid - century modern home. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -26, approving a Preliminary Plat with Lot Width Variances at 5633 Tracy Avenue based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot area and depth, and nearly meet the median width. Page 2 Aar Minutes /Edina City Council /March 5, 2013 3. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block of Tracy Avenue. 4. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. S. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. c. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of this property, an 80 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the District's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Tracy Avenue e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the City Engineer. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2 -25 ADOPTED — APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OBLIGATIONS BY THE CITY OF LILYDALE, MINN OTA TO FINANCE A PROJECT BY C VIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF MINNEAPOLIS Finance Director Presentation Finance Director Wallin indicated th in 20Vsa Christian chool had requested the City issue tax exempt bonding to fund a project; ho eveposal s turned down. As a result, the School obtained taxable funding and was now r ublic aring to convert that taxable debt into tax - exempt cond uit bank qualified debt issue of ilydale. It was noted the City of Edina would have no responsibility for the debt being proroved, and the purpose of the public hearing was to provide opportunity for residents to testiomments would then be forwarded to the City of Lilydale. Proponent Presentation Steve Fenlon, 2042 Charlton Ridge, West S . Paul, Mid st Healthcare Capital and the Calvin Christian School's consultant, indicated if approved he bond to a issued through the City of Lilydale to have access to bank qualification. A commer ial bank would be t lender. The project scope was a building addition including a media center /li ary, computer lab, con erence room, administrative office with health station, improvement to th front entry, a sprinkler syst , extensive landscaping, and hallway with restrooms. That project cost as $2.5 million with $1.5 million financed through a taxable note. Page 3 4a� OF MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 A. Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com o e Date: July 18, 2013 H`'Ao A �y To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Preliminary Plat for Shanight Addition Dated June 25, 2013 Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plat and offer the following comments: O A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as MPCA, curb cut permits from City of Edina Engineering Department, and a grading permit from the City of Edina Building Department. O SAC and REC fees will be required for this project. Sheet 4 of 4 — Grading, Drainage, Utility and Tree Plan: • Change background on plan to show improved Tracy Ave; the current plan does not show the concrete curb and gutter bike lane. • Provide a swale from the southwest corner of the building pad of Lot 2 to Hawkes Terrace. • To minimize the disturbance of the vegetative buffer along Hawkes Terrace, I would recommend that the applicant look at utilizing the current driveway apron on Tracy Ave for both driveways. typically recommend removing driveways from collector streets to minimize access to busier roadways. I also recommend that the driveways be designed to have turn - around spaces so the exiting vehicles can drive into traffic versus backing into traffic. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. qa7 Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 To: City Council From: Karen M. Kurt Assistant City Manager Date: August 20, 2013 Subject: Approve Living Streets Policy Action Requested: Approve Living Streets Policy ,r� �- V1 E� ,O • In�.ixw° • 1PPP Agenda Item #: VIII. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information I Background: In May 2011, the City Council adopted a resolution in support of Living Streets and directed the Edina Transportation Commission to work with staff to develop a Living Streets Policy. Key steps in the development of the policy are outlined below: • ETC formed a Living Streets Working Group. Members Paul Nelson, Jennifer Janovy and Michael Thompson played a critical role in policy development • The City received a $15,000 grant from the Bloomington Health Department. These funds were used to hire a consultant to review current city policies and to provide a framework for moving forward. • Blue Cross and Blue Shield sponsored a workshop on February 15, 2012 led by representatives from the National Complete Streets Coalition. Key community stakeholders attended and participated in a brainstorming session about Edina's vision for future streets. • The ETC Working Group and staff prepared a draft Living Streets Policy which was reviewed with the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, Human Rights and Relations Commission, Park Board, Energy and Environment Commission and Bike Edina Task Force. Feedback is collected for incorporation into the Living Streets Policy and future Living Streets Plan. • The Living Streets Policy draft is reviewed during a joint work session with ETC and City Council. Upon policy adoption, Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner, will begin working with internal and external advisory groups to draft content for the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how the Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well best practices for community engagement during the design process. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Confirmed members of the external advisory group are: • Arnie Bigbee, Human Rights and Relations Commission • Claudia Carr, Planning Commission • Jennifer Janovy, Transportation Commission • Ellen Jones, Park Board • Bill McCabe, Arts and Culture Commission • Paul Nelson, Transportation Commission • Paul Thompson, Energy and Environment Commission • Courtney Whited, Transportation Commission Page 2 Staff is waiting for confirmation from additional representatives from the Planning Commission, Energy and Environment Commission and Community Health Committee. Additional community expertise will be sought as needed throughout the process. Members of the internal advisory team are: • Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer • Jeff Elasky, Police Lieutenant • Susan Faus, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director • Cindy Larson, Redevelopment Coordinator • Chad Millner, Assistant City Engineer • Bob Pestrud, Parks Foreman • John Scheerer, Street Supervisor • Jeff Siems, Fire Marshal Additional staff expertise will be sought as needed throughout the process. Staff is also in the process of securing a $5,000 grant from Bloomington Public Health that will be used to develop a community education and outreach plan for Living Streets. Attachments: Proposed Living Streets Policy Living Streets Policy Introduction Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina's vision for Living Streets and the principles and plans that will guide implementation. The Living Street Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City/s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving, reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the "do.town" effort related to community health, and the Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Street Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. For example, the Living Streets Policy will support the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which addresses mandates established under the Clean Water Act. The Living Streets Policy provides the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how the Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design process. Lastly, existing and future supporting plans such as the Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to Schools, Sidewalk Priority Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan will help to identify which projects are priorities with respect to this Policy. Living Streets Vision Edina is a place where... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Living Streets Prindples The following principles will guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes. Connectivity • The City will design, operate, and maintain a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel. • The City will seek opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation. This includes preserving and repurposing existing rights -of -way, and adding new rights -of -way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit. • The City will prioritize non - motorized improvements to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas. • The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. • Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Application • The City will apply this Living Streets Policy to all street projects including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation, or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • The City will act as an advocate for Living Street principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. • Living Streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of smaller improvements or maintenance activities over time. • The City will draw on all sources of transportation funding to implement this Policy and actively pursue grants, cost sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • All City departments will support the vision and principles outlined in the Policy in their work. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving, and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of the project proposal. Exceptions: • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair, or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway, or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands, or other critical areas. Desien The City will develop and adopt guidelines as part of the Living Streets Plan to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines will allow for context- sensitive designs. The City's design guidelines will: • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well- designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared -use pathways on all arterial and collector streets and on local connector streets as determined by context. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid -block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right -of -way for boulevards. • Allocate right -of -way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations, and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update the Living Streets Plan. Context Sensitivity Although many streets look more or less the same, every street is a unique combination of its neighborhood, adjacent land uses, natural features, street design, users, and modes. To accommodate these differences, the City will: • Seek input from stakeholders; • Design streets with a strong sense of place; • Be mindful of preserving and protecting natural features, such as waterways, trees, slopes, and ravines; • Be mindful of existing land uses and neighborhood character; and • Coordinate with business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts. Benchmarks and Performance Measures The City will monitor and measure its performance relative to this Policy. Benchmarks demonstrating success include: • Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling; • Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely; • Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably; • An active way of life is available to all; • There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries; • No unfiltered street water flows into local waterways; storm water volume is reduced; and • Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. The City will draw on the following data to measure performance. Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. • Number of crashes or transportation - related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post - project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Speed statistics of vehicles on local streets. Implementation The goal of this Policy is to define and guide the implementation of Living Streets principles. Several steps still need to be taken to reach this goal. The first step will be to develop a Living Streets Plan to guide the implementation of the Policy. The Plan will: • Identify and implement standards or guidelines for street and intersection design, universal pedestrian access, transit accommodations, and pedestrian crossings; • Identify and implement standards or guidelines for streetscape ecosystems, including street water management, urban forestry, street furniture, and utilities; • Identify regulatory demands and their relationship to this Policy (ADA /PROWAG, MPCA, MNMUTCD, MnDOT state aid, watershed districts); • Define the process by which residents participate in street design and request Living Streets improvements; and • Define standards for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to ensure access to key public, private and regional destinations. Additional implementation steps include: • Communicate this Policy to residents and other stakeholders; educate and engage on an ongoing basis; • Update City ordinances, engineering standards, policies and guidelines to agree with this Policy; • Inventory building and zoning codes to bring these into agreement with Living Streets principles as established by this Policy; • Update and document maintenance policies and practices to support Policy goals; • Update and document enforcement policies and practices to ensure safe streets for all modes; • Incorporate Living Streets concepts in the next circulation of the City's general plans (Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to School Plan, etc.); • Incorporate Living Streets as a criteria when evaluating transportation priorities in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP); • Review and update funding policies to ensure funding sources for Living Streets projects; and • Coordinate with partner jurisdictions to achieve goals in this Policy. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • ,,v v9. ��RBPeUg �� To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.B From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion ❑X Date: August 20, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Sketch Plan, 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re- develop 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard from office uses to retail uses including a drive - through. Currently the building on the site contains a real estate office, a hair loss treatment center, a telecommunication switching site and a small vacancy formerly occupied by a builder office /showroom. The applicant, Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group, would like to repurpose and remodel the existing building with neighborhood retail services. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5a —A 10 of the Planning Commission staff memo.) To accommodate the request, the following would be required: I. A Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. The property is located just west of Highway 100 and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Uses include a gas station, Burger King, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. (See the Zoning for the area on page A2, and the Comprehensive Plan designations for the area on pages A I I —A 13.) The proposed use of the property would be consistent with the existing land uses to the south. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A 13.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." Therefore, the decision to require a Small Area Plan can be made by the City Council at the Sketch Plan review. Planning Commission Consideration: On July 24, 2013, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) The Planning Commission generally believed that the use was appropriate as long as adequate parking was provided. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the July 24, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Memo, July 24, 2012 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 a compromise that may work; however as previously mentioned without seeing it it is difficult to design or envision. It was further suggested that staff conditions (all) be available for review at the Council level. Concluding, Commissioners thanked the developers for their response to their earlier comments adding in their opinion this will be a good project and possibly the first in the - redevelopment of the Grandview area. Ayes; Carpenter, Potts, Platteter, Carr, Forrest, Staunton. Motion carried. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review— Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group— 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re- develop 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard from office uses to retail uses including a drive - through. Currently the building on the site contains a real estate office, a hair loss treatment center, a telecommunication switching site and a small vacancy formerly occupied by a builder office /showroom. The applicant, Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group, would like to repurpose and remodel the existing building with neighborhood retail services. Aaker explained to accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. A Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. Continuing, Aaker reported that the property is located just west of Highway 100 and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Uses include a gas station, Burger King, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. The proposed use of the property would be consistent with the existing land uses to the south. Aaker noted this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Page 10 of 15 Council." Therefore, the decision to require a Small. Area Plan can be made by the City Council at the Sketch Plan review. Appearing for the Applicant David Anderson, Frauenshuh and Nick Sperides, SRa Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson addressed the Commission and reported their intent is to rezone the property from POD1, (Planned Office District) to PCD2, (Planned Commercial District). Anderson explained this is a sizeable employment area, adding their goal is to repurpose the property to better serve neighborhood commercial service demands and the economic viability of the property. With graphics Anderson pointed out "before" and "after" schematics of the property noting the building is low level. If the Commission and Council are agreeable to repurposing the property the following changes to the property would include: • Implement an updated landscape plan • Improve and repair the building's exterior, to include lighting, awnings and other architectural features • Create a better pedestrian experience by including walkways and outdoor seating areas • Potential for a drive - through option • Reconfigure the parking in keeping with ordinance requirements and •. Improved internal vehicle access and circulation. Concluding Anderson asked the Commission for their opinion on the sketch plan. Discussion Commissioner Platteter commented that he likes the concept; however, believes this is a hard site to get in and out of. Platteter suggested reconsidering access points (eliminate west entry along Edina Ind. Blvd.) and changing the location of the proposed drive - through; possibly to the rear. Continuing, Platteter also suggested energizing the corner of Metro Blvd /Edina Inc. Blvd. to be more pedestrian friendly. Concluding, Platteter stated he understands the requested change, adding it would continue the synergy of the areas service component; however, this is a hard site. Mr. Sperides responded that they looked at different scenarios for the drive - through but found out that moving it to the rear wouldn't work because of the three lanes (in, out & Drive - through), circulation and the difficulty in ensuring that the driver is on the proper side. Commissioner Platteter agreed driver placement was an issue, he noted in the Grandview area a drive- through is located between buildings; in the middle. Mr. Sperides added they are open to revisiting drive - through placement, adding they don't know if a drive- through would be part of the equation; however, want that option kept open because it's important to retail. Continuing, Sperides said another point they needed to keep in mind was stacking. Platteter agreed, adding as presented he is unsure if stacking would be adequate. Mr. Page 11 of 15 Sperides pointed out adequate stacking capacity is also very important for the retailer; without adequate stacking the business would suffer too. Chair Staunton, commented that it is important to both the Commission and City Council that adequate stacking space is provided for drive - through window components. Staunton asked the applicant what their vision is for this property. Mr. Anderson said Frauenshuh observed this area was undergoing a change and creating an opportunity to repurpose the property in response to that change would benefit everyone. Anderson said what they do know is that the employment base is there and retail services to respond to that base are needed. Continuing, Anderson said the vision is to capture the current activity in a positive manner. Anderson added in his opinion this area has become more of a mixed use area, reiterating the introduction of more retail is good. Commissioner Potts stated in his opinion this area is very challenging and if redeveloped a complete traffic analysis needs to be completed. Planner Aaker responded if a formal application to rezone the property is submitted a traffic analysis is a requirement of that process. Commissioner Carr said she realizes this is only in the "sketch plan" phase; however if redeveloped she would like the applicant to pay attention to aesthetics; such as lighting, landscaping, outdoor seating areas, etc. to create a more attractive place to visit and view. Anderson commented the intent would be to revitalize the site. Commissioner Forrest commented that she's not sure she's on board with the rezoning request. Forrest said she is concerned with parking, vehicle circulation and the potential drive - through space. Continuing, Forrest pointed out as previously mentioned by Commissioner Potts that much depends on the outcome of the traffic analysis. Mr. Anderson said the initial thought was to gain Commission and Council input on the proposed rezoning. Anderson said if that support was present it would allow them to prepare a site plan supported by a completed market and traffic analysis for formal review. Anderson explained that is the reason why the plans presented aren't firm, reiterating they felt the first step was to gain input on the rezoning. A discussion ensued on if the Commission felt extending the PCD zoning designation to this side of the street makes sense. Commissioners expressed the opinion that pedestrian and vehicle safety is of the utmost importance, pointing out the volume of activity is this "neighborhood" is very high. Commissioners also observed that it is difficult to make a decision without the facts; such as tenant mix and how that mix relates to traffic. Page 12 of 15 Commissioner Forrest asked Planner Aaker if the site were rezoned would all uses within the PCD -2 zoning district be allowed. Aaker responded in the affirmative; adding parking requirements need to be met for each use which could limit uses. The discussion continued on the rezoning clarifying without the traffic analysis and knowledge of the uses in the tenant space it is difficult to make an educated decision. Commissioners suggested moving forward keeping in mind how important the relationship is between traffic and use. It was further noted that if it is found that pedestrians do want to cross the street both ways having these amenities makes sense and would be of benefit to the area and areas users. Mr. Anderson thanked the Commission for their comments, adding they would speak with City staff before submitting the sketch plan to the City Council. B. Residential Redevelopment Ordinance — Recap from City Council Meeting Chair Staunton reminded the Commission of the numerous meetings held on residential redevelopment and amending the Zoning Ordinance. Staunton said the Commission forwarded their final draft to the City Council for their July 16th meeting. Staunton stated he along with Commissioners Forrest and Potts attended that meeting to present the Commission's recommendations. Staunton stated after Council action there was concern that the Council didn't understand the intent of the Commission on specific issues; mainly building height, 2 "d story step elimination and setbacks. Chair Staunton said in speaking with City Staff he felt there was a need to reiterate to the Council the Commissions intent on one set of items ( #3 per memo) and referred the Commission to the attached statement of intent and graphics. Clarifying Staunton said at their July 16th meeting the Council adopted a 30 -foot cap on building height and elimination of the second floor setback; however declined to adopt the side yard setback formula. Staunton added he doesn't want to second guess the Council and is agreeable with their decision; however, reiterated he wants to make sure they understood the Commissions intent on side yard setback as part of a "bundle" that works simultaneously. Staunton referred to the table provided in the Ordinance amendment on side yard setbacks and wondered if the Council thought this table was too cumbersome. Staunton said the goal of the Commission was also to provide the public with greater clarity in the Ordinance; however, the Council may not have felt this was achieved in the Commission's final draft. Staunton told the Commission he would be forwarding his statement along with the graphics provided by Commissioner Potts to the Council before their final reading on the Ordinance amendments at their August 5th meeting. Staunton asked the Commission for their input on the "statement ". He acknowledged the statement also recommends that on lots narrower than 75 -feet in width that there be at least a total of 25% of the lot width (with a minimum setback no less than what currently exists). Page 13 of 15 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: July 24, 2013 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard MEMO o G� 0 .,nom �. The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re- develop 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard from office uses to retail uses including a drive - through. (See location on pages Al —A4.) Currently the building on the site contains a real estate office, a hair loss treatment center, a telecommunication switching site and a small vacancy formerly occupied by a builder office /showroom. The applicant, Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group, would like to repurpose and remodel the existing building with neighborhood retail services. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5a —A10.) To accommodate the request, the following would be required: A Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. The property is located just west of Highway 100 and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Uses include a gas station, Burger King, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. (See the Zoning for the area on page A2, and the Comprehensive Plan designations for the area on pages Al 1 —A13.) The proposed use of the property would be consistent with the existing land uses to the south. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page Al 3.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." Therefore, the decision to require a Small Area Plan can be made by the City Council at the Sketch Plan review. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO w9jN�1 A oV1 Cn .by The following is a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed building complies with the POD -1 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Compliance Table * Variance Required (Site would become short parked) Comprehensive Plan Inconsistency The site is guided for Office Uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The above mentioned Commercial sites located south of the subject property, are guided for Industrial use, therefore, they are not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (Page A11.) If the applicant pursues a Comprehensive Plan amendment, staff would also recommend that these Commercial sites also be included for consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Neighborhood Commercial to bring the existing uses into compliance. Additional Identified Issues Staff would highlight the following issues for discussion: ➢ Drive - through in front of the building. Consider moving it to the back of the building. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard (POD -1) Proposed (Existing) Buildinq Setbacks (Existing Building) Front — Edina Ind. Blvd 35 feet 56 feet Front — Metro Boulevard 35 feet 35 feet Rear — East 20 feet 58 feet Side — North 20 feet 62 feet Building Height 4 stories 1 story Building Coverage 30% 22% Maximum Floor Area .5% .22% Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls (Site) (Office Use) 58 57 (Retail Use) 71 57* Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance Required (Site would become short parked) Comprehensive Plan Inconsistency The site is guided for Office Uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The above mentioned Commercial sites located south of the subject property, are guided for Industrial use, therefore, they are not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (Page A11.) If the applicant pursues a Comprehensive Plan amendment, staff would also recommend that these Commercial sites also be included for consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Neighborhood Commercial to bring the existing uses into compliance. Additional Identified Issues Staff would highlight the following issues for discussion: ➢ Drive - through in front of the building. Consider moving it to the back of the building. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 'I CITY OO F :DItNA i MEMO ➢ Elimination of the existing western access to Edina Industrial Boulevard. This access is too close to the intersection. ➢ Concern over a lack of parking space for conversion into retail spaces. The shortage could further increase, if a restaurant use were to go into the site. ➢ Circulation. If drive - through is moved to the back, there may not be adequate area for two way circulation. ➢ Office land uses to the north and west. Traffic /Parking A traffic and parking study would need to be completed to determine impacts on adjacent roadways, and if there would be adequate parking provided. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 8 E a' E C LL S L J • Jr g z E Irk � • � _ m q u W "' >^ raar+rrn r roo r' -rr S ✓ � W ' ^ n a $ h q + n Ll$ ^ R g ��I1Y76 ®R o• t� a.m M a U fz g a E � � v% c a J m v E E '°• F °g tl 9 9 S 'C B 3 g R$�� 3 F i a 6 6 d fs 0 �$ o�_' �.! � W ��� y R �� �� •: III O 'IX3NWAVIPD y '. ,t� j - _ OA 7B LON ¢� f W ^$ 8 R � ! I tl z F City of Edina NC 1'f41- h ! � ,r 7615 L 7615 W w AWMI 1'5109 7500 1 i ' R 51019 r F± Q t• Ydf A •� u P EMA Wt'5TRML Qt YQ• - - - 77 IN ST W o _ _ ^�• •. � s '4 7,x00 �i -t �"-: _ ti 7750 ylr. 1 L s- � 2211 left '# n • _,A t fir, i. I i tiro f�� .t • 7tl00 - -. y ,' -. e.w,.,•fwsew tatrJ061xiat16 �: k�1Y''S � �.., � o�_ — ._ —. _:.,.r. e le ' r' � r1 y a k ��V `-') •� ti r ,U4d Legend Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Y .! / °" City Limits Creeks . -.� Lake Names Lakes ❑ Parks I—I l�l Parcels 2092 Aerial Photo City of Edina NC 1'f41- h ! � ,r 7615 L 7615 W w AWMI 1'5109 7500 1 i ' R 51019 r F± Q t• Ydf A •� u P EMA Wt'5TRML Qt YQ• - - - 77 IN ST W o _ _ ^�• •. � s '4 7,x00 �i -t �"-: _ ti 7750 ylr. 1 L s- � 2211 left '# n • _,A t fir, i. I i tiro f�� .t • 7tl00 - -. y ,' -. e.w,.,•fwsew tatrJ061xiat16 �: k�1Y''S � �.., � o�_ — ._ —. _:.,.r. e le ' r' � r1 y a k ��V `-') •� ti r ,U4d Legend Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Street Name Labels .! / °" City Limits Creeks . -.� Lake Names Lakes ❑ Parks I—I l�l Parcels 2092 Aerial Photo >t• X wd 7645 D1U0 i EDWA KJDUSTRAL BLVD 1 Ab t Ob a n � 5105 {' M�aa0el w.tiAtiUS CaPY'4�i41 1 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group July 10, 2013 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard - Rezoning and Repositioning Plan Dear Mr. Teague: In connection with our recent discussions, this letter describes the schematic land use plan and repositioning initiative Frauenshuh Inc. is undertaking for property at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard ( "Property "). Overview Frauenshuh is in the process of acquiring the Property with the intent of making significant improvements and enhancements that will position the site to better serve neighborhood commercial service demand and economic viability of the Property. The Property consists of an approximately 1.3 acre parcel with an existing approximately 12,916 square foot one -story multi -tenant commercial building. The building at one time was operated as a bank branch facility with drive - through (on the westerly portion of the site) and eventually expanded easterly into its existing configuration (see attached existing site plan). Current building tenants include a real estate ,brokerage office, hair loss treatment center, a telecommunication switching site and a small vacancy formerly occupied by a builder office /showroom. The property is presently zoned POD 1 (Planned Office District), which permits office uses various types of commercial uses, but limits certain types of retail uses such as those allowed in the PCD (planned commercial district) zone, including restaurants, retail shops and other types of neighborhood commercial services that are valued services in this area. , The potential to revitalize the property while bringing additional high quality neighborhood retail services to the area, and Frauenshuh is requesting to rezone the property to the PCD2 designation to allow a wider range of neighborhood commercial uses that would add to the mix and vitality of the property and neighborhood commercial services. kS m 7101 West 78th Street, Suite 100 a Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 ® Telephone: 952.829.3480 n FrauenshuhCommercial.com Cary Teague July 10, 2013 Page 2 Repositioning Plan Highlillhts The enclosed schematic plan set shows future potential and current property conditions. Aged and outdated landscape treatments and general exterior building and parking deferred maintenance issues are evident. The intent of the repositioning plan is to invest and bring new life and character to the property through a physical improvement and dynamic leasing strategy. The PCD rezoning will allow implementation of a repositioning plan that would allow existing building tenants to remain while providing the ability to attract new and vibrant neighborhood commercial tenants that are attracted to the convenience, visibility and character of the property. Some of the repositioning highlights will include: ® Implement an updated landscape plan for the Property; Improvements and repair of exterior building elements, to potentially include: architectural treatments, awnings, accent lighting and materials replacement; e Installation of pedestrian enhancements, including walkways, outdoor seating areas, etc.. per future tenant plans; e Future drive - through on the westerly portion of the building per future tenant plans; • Reconfiguration of parking layout, while maintaining a parking ratio in excess of 4:1000 for the overall site; O Improved internal vehicle access and site circulation. Timing and Next Steps Frauenshuh is prepared to proceed with the submittal of the formal site plan and rezoning application. Prior to this application, we look forward to additional feedback from the City on the sketch plan and project concept. If you have questions in the meantime, please contact me at (952) 829 -3480. Sincerely, '1 Davi A erson Senior Vice President Enclosures: Schematic Plan Set cc: Nick Sperides, SRa Dean Williamson, Frauenshuh AS I� 4400 WEST OLD SHMOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 SITE IMPROVEMENTS FRAUENSHUH BLOONJNCTCh�I, NJNNESOTA 55437 Sfla—. PH: 954.996.9664 5801 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD FX:954.996.9663 Commercial Real Estate Group SPERIDES REINERS ARCIIITEM,INC. WWW.SVKJ- TECTSINC.COM -r MARINE 1 �'!t ®► f j Paz L 8 >t 14 o� „ z :a �.il • .wr - N� 4200 WEST OLD SHMOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 SITE OVERLAY • BLOOMINGTON, MNNESOTA 55437 F R AU EN S H U H PH: 952.996.9662 5801 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD ,a, FK 952.996.9663 Commercial Real Estate Group iPUIDFS REIMERS ARCHITECTS, IN' WWW.SRARCHITECT5INCCOM BITUMINOUS / e 60 I RE FM FT GREEN AREA Qi''t11II Vu�! RIIPCiIE W J o i 3 07 I (o' "t W ~ U af O _ a �O LL _ B I" V Q I a I BITUMINOUS SPEPI069 ApNCNS ARC111iF.C15, P'C OWNER: PARKLAWN PROPERTIES LLC S 89'31'30" E 318.01 _ I GREEN I AREA I FF 30 PARKI G STA I BITUMINOUS �I ei BITUMINOUS GREEN 1 AREA - -- 61.3 - -- W_ F o! o w 5801 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD / 1 -STORY BRICK BUILDING 11"C z FOOTPRINT AREA = 12,930 SO. FT. x 0- BUILDING IS 17.8 FEET IN HEIGHT AT THIS POINT— \ UI \ \ BITUMINOUS .6 61.8 U7) jGREEN 6 AREA W Z O PATIO 14 ARQY 6TALlA I BITUMINOUS n GREEN AREA X � I GREEN• .19 ,In a 8 AREA I•RDAD W� ACCFE6 N 89'31'30° W 318.01 — EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD SITE PLAN OPTION 1 07.09.2D13 © FRAUENSHUH ,9 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 20 EXISTING SITE JUNE 2013 BLOOMINGTON, FK FRAUENSHUH 2llNGTCxJ MINNESOTA 55437 FH:952.996.9663 952.996.9662 5801 EDNA INDUSTRIAL BLVD Commercial Real Estate Group SPERIDB ncrncxsaacwhc- WWW.SRARCWTECTSINC.COM OWNER: PARKLAWN PROPERTIES LLC S 89'31 X30" E 318.01 BITUMINOUS / I 60 I i GREEN AREA I ,A A I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 301 PARKING STALLS 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I T BITUMINOUS I �I ml ACCES ROAD I I BITUMINOUS I GREEN AREA GREEN AREA / 7 — — — — — — 61.3 \ Z ILLS / � � LLJ D_ O O GREEN .1 ti O d o O AREA 5801 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD 1 -STORY BRICK BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA = 12,930 SO. FT. z S? O O O IL' 0_ O ® BUILDING IS 17.8 FEET IN HEIGHT AT THIS POINT— — — / \ a 0- =m 0 4/ \ \\ -A O Z I \ C Q Ul 3 / \ W /�yy _ 35.6 '6 61.8 N I / / 8•••�1`' :' ;'.; ;'.; ;'..;. ,: :.;: :•, �••.•'.;'..•..•.. GREEN p' -,p: GREEN AREA I W LLJ AREA Z 2 .T 9 I 0 4, 3. O I� GREEN I IN AREA BITUMINOUS nl GREEN llqq``• 15 P KING ALLS AREA 60 T V ROAD ACCESS / ROAD ACCESS \ —� GRN I I AREEA A I N 89'31'30" W 318.01 - EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD 5108 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD $PGGIDE9 AGWGRS ARCIRTECI9,NC SITE EXISTING 07.09.9013 FRAUENSHUH - -- - -- i11A �. p • Q ( :j / J ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 0) � 2 • . ,.� . 2008 Comprehensive Plan City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update S' Data Source: URS e F_tA -1 Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 At I Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -25 for living,,learning, raising families &doing business: fir` ? 1y 3008 Connpreh.ensiv Plan. Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development,. Density Mixed Use Guidelines 'Guidelines Categories MXC Established or emerging mixed Maintain existing, or Mixed -Use Center use districts serving areas larger create new, Floor to Area Current examples: than one neighborhood (and pedestrian and Ratio -Per •. 50th France beyond city boundaries). streetscape current and Primary uses: Retail, office, amenities; encourage � Zonin g Code: • Grandview service, multifamily residential, or require structured maximum of institutional uses, parks and parking. Buildings 1.5 open space. "step down" in height 1 -2 Vertical mixed use should be from intersections. units /acre encouraged, and may be 4 stories at 50th It required on larger sites. France; 3 -6 stories at Grandview CAC The most intense district in Form -based design - Community Activity terms of uses, height and . standards for building Floor to Area Center coverage. placement, massing_ Ratio -Per Example: Greater Primary uses: Retail, office, and street - level current Southdale area (not lodging, entertainment and treatment. Zoning Code: including large multi- residential uses, combined or in Buildings should be maximum of family residential separate buildings. placed in appropriate 0.5 to 1.0* neighborhoods such Secondary uses: Institutional, proximity to streets to 2 - 3 as Centennial Lakes) recreational uses. create pedestrian units /acre Mixed use should be encouraged, scale. �� Buildings "step and may be required.on larger down at boundaries sites. with lower- density districts and upper stories "step back ". from street. More stringent design standards for buildings > 5 stories. Emphasize pedestrian circulation; re- introduce finer- grained circulation patterns where feasible. j Applies to existing predominantly Performance Industrial industrial areas within the City. standards to ensure Floor to Area Primary uses: industrial, compatibility with Ratio: Per manufacturing. Secondary uses: adjacent uses-, Zoning Code: limited retail and service uses. screening of outdoor 0.5* activities. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -29 e t. ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan Legend: Potential Areas of Change- I - North France Avenue 2- Neighborhood Commercial Nodes 3- Con-Irnunq Cornrnercial Nodes 4-S 0 uthdale Area n INN 5 - CornrnerciaVOffice Corridors u u :I r 7� M — WA WINT P, 62ntl �7 I Y 65th 51 WT7W vow vin. f. rX z _ V 7 0 r ILI AWN j, W 7 W 78th it-1 I 801h SI W K 1 rt -t Figure 4.4 5 0* City of Edina Conceptual Land Use Framework: 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Potential Areas of Change Date ofAerial Photography: August 2006 F-L-F-1-J-1 0 0 5 fides Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4.- Land Use and Community Design A13 4-33 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: August 5, 2013 Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -67 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: O! nel' • ,. \J vFp • ��RBPe08 Agenda Item #: VIII. C. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipients departments for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -67 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-67 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Crosstown Camera Club Marty Thatcher Heidi Briggs William & Carol Lord Mary Bang Lisa Colbert Anne Marie Gromme Bob Genovese Michael Kelly & Michelle Herring Carol Urness Steven Fishbeck Lorraine W. Neuger Lorraine W. Neuger Craig Plekkenpol Dated August 20, 2013 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK $50.00 Art Books & Artist Supplies Artist Supplies $50.00 Paddy Nelson Memorial $50.00 Juried Art Show Artist Supplies 16 mm Projector Bell & Howell Assorted Sized Pottery Batts $500.00 Juried Art Show $30 Juried Art Show $100.00 Juried Art Show $100.00 Jim Van Valkenburg Memorial $100.00 Honoring Deb Neuger & Bill McCabe $50.00 Juried Art Show James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 20, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk si BLOOMINGTON CMC THEATRE BLOOMINGTON ART CENTER BLOOMINGTON THEATRE AND ART CENTER 'e exist to enrich the cultural fabric of the communities we serve by providing high quality :rforming arts, visual arts, and arts education programs, and welcoming and nurturing talent. August 7, 2013 Councilmember Mary Brindle City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mary: In just a few short weeks, Bloomington Theatre and Art Center (BTAC) will open Bloomington Mapworks 111— an exhibition that presents eight of our hometown's most iconic places through six artists' eyes. From the tranquil Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge to the bustling Mall of America and the inimitable David Fong's, Bloomington's landmarks are both celebrated and re- imagined in this remarkable show. Bloomington Mapworks 111 is no ordinary exhibit. It's a rare opportunity for people of all walks of life to find common ground through fresh perspectives on the places we live, work, and play. To celebrate, we're throwing a party for the artists, exhibition sponsors, and BTAC friends and supporters to preview the show before it opens to the general public. I hope you'll join us for this fun - filled evening! Bloomington Mapworks 111 Preview Party Thursday, August 29, 6 — 8 p.m. Bloomington Center for the Arts hors d'oeuvres by CRAVE a music by Brother Timothy o cash bar Civic Plaza by Erik Sletten —one of 48 paintings featured in Bloomington Mapworks 111. Kind regards, - -A Andrea Specht Executive Director 1800 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, MN 55431 952 - 563 -8575 1 www.btacmn.org Tickets are available for $20 at www.btacmn.org (look for the link to Bloomington Mapworks 111 on our home page) or by calling 952 -563- 8575. 1 look forward to seeing you at the party! METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMNUSSION �P °t iS S,p -ti, Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport r t 9� 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450 -2799 IT ` Phone(612)726 -8100 yt t N 0 N Office of Executive Director 9 0" e t G� SN 41RPoft August 7, 2013 City of Edina Attn: Mayor James Hovland 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Mayor Hovland, SEAL -9 20'3 RECEIVED I am following up on our discussion about the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) review of the partial implementation of Area Navigation (RNAV) procedures at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP). As you know, the FAA has expressed concern that there are possible safety barriers to the partial implementation of RNAV at MSP. The FAA is continuing to conduct its safety review to determine if the partial RNAV implementation proposal can be executed safely. The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is awaiting the findings of the FAA's safety analysis. I assure you that upon receipt of the FAA safety study findings, the MAC will share the information with all interested stakeholders, including the City of Edina. miel MAC Executive Director /CEO The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer. www.mspairport.com Reliever Airports: AIRLAKE • ANOKA COUNTY /BLAINE • CRYSTAL • FLYING CLOUD • LAKE ELMO • SAINT PAUL DOWNTOWN ece "OK9 C, C C v p V9 PA O'[ Ll 3 C CA e bf L J ot CA b � _ �C, C 1 g A f# If 75 IJ 9t Cite Council Tem Expires Gary E. Johnson ..............2014 Mayor Liquor Comminee Public Works DeveiopmentAVater Personnel EDA John Young, Jr ..................2014 Public Safety Liquor Committee DevelopmentnVater Heartland Trail Extension Community Club EDA Stacey Riedberger .............2016 Public Works Government Services Friends of the Pool EDA & EDA Advisor C.J. Holl ...........................2014 Public Safety Liquor Committee Personnel EDA & EDA Advisor Ben Gunkelman ...............2016 Government Services Public Safety EDA & EDA Advisor Public Utilities Commission Jerald Pederson .................2013 2013 Justin Martin ....................2014 Donald Martodam .............2015 2014 Gary E. Johnson........ ex- officio Airport Commission John Young, Jr ...................2013 Geoff Bentley .....................2014 Mike Sprenger ...................2014 2013 Dennis Martin ...................2015 Todd Sparrow ....................2015 2014 Park Board Brad Christensen ...............2013 Vacant ............................... 2013 C.J. Holl . ...........................2014 Marc Ness .......................... 2014 Deanna Ulven ....................2015 Planning Commission *Craig Fenske ....................2013 Stacey Riedberger ..............2013 *Philip Stahl ......................2014 Jay Swanson ......................2014 *Mel Ristvedt .....................2015 Gregg Pekas ......................2016 Vacant .... ...........................2016 *Board of Adjustment members City Attorney Zenas Baer Citv Clerk —Treasurer Lisa Jetvig Public Works Kevin Berg Gerry Muck City of Hawley Phone: (218) 483 -3331 MOO i 305 6th Street Fax: (218) 483 -3332 www.hawley.govoffce.ce / P.O. Box 69 Birthplace of the Hawley, Minnesota 56549 -0069 TTY: 1- 800 - 627 -3529 Hjemkomst August 5; 2013 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W 501h St Edina, MN 55424 -1330 RE: July 28 fatal house fire in the Cite of Hawley Dear Mayor Hovland: I want to personally thank the City of Edina and specifically the Edina Fire Department for its assistance fighting the fire and stabilizing the structure in Hawley. I was personally at the scene and the fire fighters knew exactly what to do and how to react as the scene commander directed all of the teams. Because of the length of time needed to bring the fire under control and to recover the body, we needed many air tanks and trained fire personnel. The ppmmur;ications where great, the team preparedness was superb and the fire fighters . attitudes were great. every fire fighter would do anything asked of them to help 'bring the fire under control and find and recover the young girl, Rylie Efterfield. It was a very difficult morning for everyone at the fire scene. I was able to talk to and thank many of the teams that came to assist in this tragic event. Please do pass on Hawley's sincere appreciation to your department members. You have -a talented, well trained department. Deb Mangen From: timothydeangelo @yahoo.com mt: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 7:40 AM ,o: Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Braemar Priority Use Policy City leaders, This will be my oldest son's (7 yrs old) 4th year in the EHA and the hockey experience has been priceless for him. The coaches and administration have been second to none! My younger son (4 yrs old) is starting hockey this fall and we decided to put him in the Minnesota Made program as all the practices and games are at one location. That way my older boy can still be part of the EHA league where his friends are. My wife is a RN and works weekends so I alone have to coordinate the kids activities on the weekend (including my oldest daughter's activities also). We felt that I could not juggle driving the two boys all over the metro area for hockey and the MM program was the only option for both boys to play hockey. Long story short, I was appalled that a city facility did not put the EHA organization first. I do not know all the details on the subject but based on the figures that I have seen the large majority of the residents in the EHA are bearing a much larger burden then the figure skating club, who the majority are not even residents. In my eyes it is simple if city dollars go into the facility the residents that pay those taxes get priority first, period. Otherwise stop using our money for the faculty, sell it to a private owner and the can do what they want. Tim DeAngelo 4616 Concord Terrace, Edina Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint! Deb Mangen From: Pat Manion <pmanion @originalmktg.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 8:42 AM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Braemar Ice solution Good Morning, As Past President of the EHA and District 6 hockey I watched in amazement you meeting last evening. Without detailing all of the errors presented last night I wanted to give a potential partial solution. Since you have shifted both the EHA ice and the Skating Club ice why not ask the EHS teams to shift ice as well? High school begins I believe at 8:30. Why not ask both the Boys and Girls team to take SOME ice at 6:30 -8:00a am? With the brand new locker rooms the players no longer need to schlep their equipment back and forth. It is left in the locker rooms. They could shower after practice and head off to school. I believe the HS calls this Zero hour. These teams then could use after school as off ice training at Velocity. While this is not a perfect solution it would let all teams using Braemar participate in the current ice shortage. Patrick Manion 6121 Crescent Dr. Edina ,MN.55436 Cell: 612 - 750 -4017 Phone: 952 - 941 -2530 Fax: 952 - 941 -6566 Deb Man en -om: Herm Finnegan <HFinnegan @loffler.com> nt: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 9:55 AM o: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net;joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Disappointing Dear Council Members, I was in attendance last night for the council meeting and I was extremely disappointed with the decision made on the priority use agreement for Braemar. The disappointment doesn't come from the number of hours allocated to EHA for the next two years (which equals less than two hour per team per year), it is about wasting City employees time and making tough decisions. You asked City employees (and used tax payer dollars) to research the situation and come to the board with a recommendation. They did their job, you didn't take any part of their recommendation and you want to create another task force to resolve this matter at another date. You already had the task force and you didn't value their input. The community looks for you to make tough decisions to more Edina forward. Last night you failed and cowardly pushed this issue off for two more years. Now, there is no clear direction for either group and this issues hangs around for two more year. Needless to say, very disappointing. Sincerely, Herm Finnegan Electronic Privacy Notice. This email, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 -2521, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. 1 Deb Mangen From: shmakredes @q.com Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 7:36 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: steve.makredes @target.com Subject: Fwd: Braemar Priority Use Agreement Honorable Mayor Hovland; I applaud your leadership! I attended the City Council Meeting last night and thought you had a firm grasp of the issues facing BCLFSC and EHA. You managed the conversation around ice time very well with your fellow Council Members. I feel you came up with a solution that will preserve figure skating in Edina. I hope that staff will now cooperate in working out the details of the agreement. I know we can count on your continued support. Edina is very fortunate to have you as Mayor! Thank You, Steve Makredes 4916 West Sunnyslope Road Edina, MN 55424 From: shmakredes2q.com To: mailgedinamn.gov Cc: "Steve Makredes" <steve.makredes(a,target.com> Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2013 10:20:44 PM Subject: Braemar Priority Use Agreement Honorable Mayor Hovland; I am a resident of Edina and my daughter has been a member of BCLFSC since 2004 and a member of Team Braemar. I would like to thanking you for your leadership at the July 16th City Council Meeting. I attended that meeting and thought that you were able to understand the impact the proposed Priority Use Agreement would have on BCLFSC. I thought your recommendation for the two sides to meet was a wise one. Unfortunately, my understanding of those meetings was the EHA position was not if BCLFSC would loose significant ice time but, when. The reason I was told EHA did not support the Park Board recommendation was it did not give them ice time fast enough. Hardly the spirit of compromise. I have just finished reading the Agenda for the August 5th City Council Meeting and the Park Board's staff revised recommendation for a Priority Use Agreement. If accepted, I believe this will ultimately lead to the end of the 47 year Figure Skating tradition in Edina. Figure Skating is a different sport than hockey. EHA is looking at ice -time through a hockey lens. While it was nice of them to offer up their ice scheduler, a quick look at open ice times at the arenas they proposed show no consecutive open ice hours. 1 would like you to consider a few other thoughts as you weigh you options for tomorrow's meeting: • Great cities provide services to a variety of activities • 2014 is an Olympic year and Figure Skating plays a major role in broadcast television. We can expect to see an increase in Edina citizen's desire to enter the sport. • Figure Skaters are athletes for sure, but are also artists, in fact they are a perfect blend of athletics and the arts. • Not all Edina residents support the dominance of Hockey. EHA has developed a very successful program with the resources they have and so has BCLFSC. The changes proposed will result in the end of BCLFSC and further dominance of hockey in Edina. • The year round cash flow generated by BCLFSC to the Braemar Arena As a parent of a figure skater, I was open to negotiate a compromise, the reality is there is not enough ice time to allow EHA to increase its ice hours at Braemar the way they want to. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting tomorrow night. For now the only course of action I can see is accept option 1 (maintain the status quo) or require EHA to be more flexible in negotiating ice hours so we can come up with a mutual agreement. Steve Makredes 4916 West Sunnyslope Road ?dina, MN 55424 952- 927 -8422 Deb Man en From: scottbell <sbell321 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mayor Hovland Dear Mr. Hovland, I am disappointed in your decision not to support the EHA in their request for priority ice time for the families of Edina. I will make certain to express myself with my vote and by devoting my time during the election to make certain we have a mayor who will support its residents in the future. You have made it clear with your current vote on the EHA issue how you feel about the families of Edina. Thank you, Scott Bell Deb Man en --om: Alex & Ted Christianson <tofte @earthlink.net> nt: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:15 PM 0: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you Mayor Hovland Dear Mayor Hovland, Thank you for your leadership during the icky ice time issue as we call it in our hockey & figure skating house. I know it has been a very contenious issue and we are grateful for your help and support. Thank you for listening, reading, meeting and researching the issue thoroughly. The skaters that were there last night learned a lot about city governement and were able to discern some good roles models!! Thank you!!! Enjoy the rest of summer! Best- The Christianson Family Ted (Assitant hockey coach and father of a figure skater) Alex (Hockey mom /team manager and Figure skater mom /equipment manager) Addie (Figure skater and Team Braemar member) Calvin (1st year Pee Wee Hockey player) Deb Man en From: Ann Makredes <amakr @msn.com> Sent Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:04 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Priority Use Agreement for BCLFSC and EHA Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland, I was present at last night's council meeting and I just would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart for your leadership in this very difficult situation. You clearly had listened to us and had read all the emails we sent you over the last few weeks. Figure skating is a complex sport but I am hopeful that, with the flexibility of Team Braemar being able to purchase some ice elsewhere, the club will be able to remain at Braemar arena. My 14 year old daughter, who was also present yesterday, learned a lot about standing up for your rights, member representation, democracy and strong leadership. Thank you again for your support, Ann Makredes 4916 West Sunnyslope Road Edina, MN 55424 Deb Man en 'mom: Paul F. Puerzer <ppuerzer @spacecenterinc.com> it: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:28 AM %): Edina Mail Subject. Edina City Council - BCLFSC Mayor Hovland — Thank you for your tireless efforts to find a workable solution to the ice time issues at the Braemar Arena. It takes a brave leader to admit that they don't always have all of the answers; especially when others want to push ahead without regard to the consequences. In two years we might find that the result of this slower path is the difference between a check -up and an autopsy. I must admit that I am still a little concerned about the staff's role in this process. Although they were supplied with all the same information that allowed you and the council to arrive at a more compromised solution they would have recommended cutting so many hours as to eventually make the BCLFSC unviable. I hope that they will realize all the cff rt find the hours that we are being required to give up — not just the number but the times and days — and not attempt to reallocate those numbers over a schedule that will not allow us to meet training schedules. Sadly even though their proposal might have proved disastrous for BCFFSC it would still not have been sufficient to resolve EHA's issues. Construction of the 4th sheet contained in the sports dome proposal might also not seem enough to EHA but perhaps it will provide them with some additional time and help to not further diminish BCLFSC's ability to survive. I know cost is always an issue but believe that given how passionate both EHA and BCLFSC are about our athletes that here would be interest by private parties to assist in the expansion. Thanks again, Paul Puerzer Deb Mangen From: Brent Hall <bhall @WLHall.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 2:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Comment for Jim Hovland Mayor Hovland, I am a resident of Edina and a business owner in Hopkins. My building is a potential victim of the Hopkins OMF location so I went to today's Corridor Management Committee meeting to better understand the process. I sat directly behind you and, I believe, in front of one of your associates. First of all, I was extremely impressed by your probing and insightful questions. As a tax payer and business owner, it makes me feel much better about the utilization of my tax dollars when I see how thorough the process is and how inquisitive and engaged the committee members are. I also thought that your compliments to the Met Council staff on the quality and quantity of their work was also a very classy gesture on your part. As a small business owner who doesn't throw around denominations like "million" and "billion" lightly, I very much appreciated the comments you directed to Peter Wagenius from the City of Minneapolis regarding keeping all three land users (LRT, freight & bike path) above ground assuming there is enough space available. This seems to be a common sense, cost effective solution. Why are 65 trains (LRT) a day OK (and something Minneapolis must always have been willing to accept) but 71 (LRT + freight) anathema and something that cannot even be discussed? If the freight train traffic is so objectionable, is the City of Minneapolis willing pay for the tunnel with its own money? As a Republican, my biggest concern with large public works projects such as this is how the cost / value tradeoff gets distorted when you are not spending your own money. If the City of Minneapolis had to pay for the tunnels themselves, the deep tunnel would be off the table.and the shallow tunnel would barely be a consideration. They would manage through the design and accommodate everyone as best they could and realize that putting a project this ambitious through an existing residential area is never easy and that some cost / benefit tradeoffs simply have to be accepted. Whether or not this is just a preliminary bargaining position against the railroads or FTA I don't know. Thank you again for your hard and thoughtful work on this project, Sincerely, Brent Hall 57 Woodland Circle, Edina 1 W.1. HALL CO. 530 15th Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 952 - 974 -7620 (Direct) 612 - 889 -7208 (Cell) 952 - 937 -9126 (Fax) www.wlhall.com Deb Man en From: Tass von Schmidt -Pauli <tassysp @yahoo.com> Sent Wednesday, November 30,20119:27 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Tass von Schmidt -Pauli Subject: Sally Lane obstruction Dear Council members, I suggest a possible solution to the "tree obstruction" issue on Sally Lane and Valleyview rd intersection. I refer to the Driveway mirror. As one trevels west on Valleyview just past Gleason rd,the old Moore House has a large driveway mirror to allow its occupants to see what is coming down Valleyview before exiting thier driveway. Why couldn't a large mirror be placed on the northest corner of the SL and VV intersection to allow cars to see what is coming west on Valleyview ?? It would be less expensive than tearing down beautiful arbivitae. Tass von Schmidt -Pauli tassyspPvahoo.com Deb Man en -.0m: Diane Wabbe <dwabbe @co.carver.mn.us> it: Thursday, August 08, 2013 1:55 PM �0: Edina Mail Subject: Meeting request from Commissioner Maluchnik Dear Mayor Hovland, Carver County Commissioner, Randy Maluchnik, requested that I contact you to set up a time for him to meet with you over lunch. Would you be available to meet him either on Monday, August 19th or Tuesday, August 20th, at a restaurant and time convenient for you. If these dates don't work, perhaps you can suggest a day the first week of September that will work for you. Thank you for your help. Carver County Administration 952 - 361 -1503 Deb Mangen From: James Hovland <jhovland @krausehovland.com> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 2:17 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Andrea Nelson Subject: RE: Meeting request from Commissioner Maluchnik Diane, thanks for the email. Please let the Commissioner know that Monday the 19th for lunch will work for me suggest Salut at 501h & France at noon. Thanks for setting this up. James B. Hovland, Esquire KRAUSE & HOVLAND, Chartered 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 ihovlandC�krausehovland.com Phone: (612) 874 -8550 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 ... .... ..... .... _..- ......... _.I...-..... __..__ _ ...__...._...__.......__..... .... From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:lbiunno0)EdinaMN.gov1 On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 1:59 PM Cc: Jane Timm Subject: FW: Meeting request from Commissioner Maluchnik Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 . IbiunnoCcbEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Diane Wabbe [ma i Ito: dwabbeCdko.carver.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 1:55 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Meeting request from Commissioner Maluchnik Dear Mayor Hovland, Carver County Commissioner, Randy Maluchnik, requested that I contact you to set up a time for him to meet with you over lunch. Would you be available to meet him either on Monday, August 191h or Tuesday, August 20th, at a restaurant and time convenient for you. If these dates don't work, perhaps you can suggest a day the first week of September that will work for you. Thank you for your help. Diane Carver County Administration 952 - 361 -1503 Deb Man en 'rum: Paul Grette <pgrette @gmail.com> nt: Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:00 PM u: Edina Mail Subject: Cc. Letter to Govenor Dayton Regarding Air Traffic Noise Attachments: My Flight Log.docx Cc. Mayor Hovland August 8, 2013 Dear Governor Dayton, I am Kim Harkins - Grette. I live at 5709 York Ave. S. in Edina, MN and I am asking for your help. Since 2010, after Delta Airlines moved in as our new airport neighbors, the number of low flying flights over my house and block has increased to an unbelievable level (more flights in a day than previously in a week). They are louder than a ore eca ey are flying lower. I can't even - get away fr house with all the doors and windows completely shut. On a regular basis, the flights start at 7 AM and continue until 10 PM. Frequently they start just after 5 AM and continue until 11PM. I am a person who loves gardening, walking in my neighborhood, entertaining on my patio with friends and family, and enjoying my family room. I can't hear the person next to me on my patio. In my family room, I can't hear the TV or radio, or someone on the phone. The planes are so low and so loud and my house wasn't specially made to handle all the constant low- flying planes. My house isn't the problem. I moved to Edina because of location. The constant noise has left me with lack of sleep, headaches, and it is very stressful not to have any relief from it. Now it is like I live in a cheap motel at the end of a runway instead of a nice neighborhood over 6 miles from the airport. I did not choose this. Increased noise was forced upon me with no discussion. Sending complaints to the MAC don't seem to have any effect. I really need you to exert your influence to get this noise out of our neighborhoods and start accommodating neighborhoods over commerce. There are runways that send planes over industrial or sparsely populated areas that are being underutilized , such as Runway 17 (which cost taxpayers $700 million), instead of the ones that send planes right over neighborhoods. I have attached a sampling of the planes that went over my home and block I live on during a stretch of a typical day. I would appreciate anything you can do to help. <<...>> Thank you so much, Kim Harkins - Grette Cc. Mayor Hovland Mu Flinht Trackinn I nn 29- Jul -13 30- Jul -13 1-Aug-13 3-Aug-13 23 42 79 24 6:58 AM 7:09 AM 7:39 AM 9:23 AM 10:15 AM 11:30 AM 7:02 AM 7:14 AM 7:13 AM 7:43 AM 9:25 AM 10:16 AM 11:35 AM 7:03 AM 7:15 AM 7:14 AM 7:44 AM 9:27 AM 10:17 AM 11:36 AM 7:05 AM 7:16 AM 7:15 AM 7:46 AM 9:29 AM 10:28 AM 11:36 AM 7:08 AM 7:17 AM 7:16 AM 7:46 AM 9:32 AM 10:29 AM 11:37 AM 7:10 AM 7:18 AM 7:18 AM 7:48 AM 9:34 AM 10:30 AM 11:39 AM 7:12 AM 7:23 AM 7:19 AM 7:49 AM 9:35 AM 10:30 AM 11:40 AM 7:13 AM 7:24 AM 7:20 AM 7:52 AM 9:36 AM 10:31 AM 11:42 AM 7:15 AM 7:25 AM 7:22 AM 7:53 AM 9:37 AM 10:32 AM 11:45 AM 7:16 AM 7:26 AM 7:23 AM 7:55 AM 9:39 AM 10:35 AM 11:45 AM 7:18 AM 7:28 AM 7:24 AM 7:56 AM 9:40 AM 10:40 AM 11:47 AM 7:20 AM 7:29 AM 7:26 AM 7:59 AM 9:41 AM 10:43 AM 11:47 AM 7:22 AM 7:30 AM 7:27 AM 8:00 AM 9:42 AM 10:44 AM 11:48 AM 7:24 AM 7:31 AM 7:28 AM 8:03 AM 9:44 AM 10:45 AM 11:50 AM 7:25 AM 7:32 AM 7:29 AM 8:03 AM 9:46 AM 10:50 AM 11:50 AM 7:27 AM 7:33 AM 7:30 AM 8:04 AM 9:47 AM 11:00 AM 11:51 AM 7:28 AM 7:34 AM 7:32 AM 8:14 AM 9:48 AM 11:04 AM 11:53 AM 7:29 AM 7:35 AM 7:33 AM 8:16 AM 9:49 AM 11:04 AM 11:54 AM 7:33 AM 7:36 AM 7:35 AM 8:19 AM 9:50 AM 11:14 AM 11:55 AM 7:40 AM 7:40 AM 7:36 AM 9:54 AM 11:15 AM 11:56 AM 7:42 AM 7:42 AM 7:37 AM 9:55 AM 11:15 AM 11:58 AM 7:45 AM 7:43 AM 7:37 AM 9:57 AM 11:17 AM 11:58 AM 7:49 AM 7:44 AM 7:38 AM 10:04 AM 11:23 AM 11:59 AM 7:50 AM 10:07 AM 11:24 AM 12:OOPM 7:54 AM 10:10 AM 11:25 AM 12:03 PM 10:12 AM 11:26 AM 10:13 AM 11:28 AM Deb Man en -mom: JulieA.Swenson <JulieA.Swenson @target.com> nt: Friday, August 09, 2013 7:01 AM o: Edina Mail Subject: Thanks! HO We are a figure skating family, living in Edina, and appreciate the work preserving our ice time. We were all set to move our daughter to the Bloomington Figure Skating Club, but since we can still get ice time at Breamar we will very happily stay here. We spend a fortune on skating with ice time and we employ an expensive coach. We spend a lot more money in Edina than hockey families. And our skaters compete all over the world. I'd much rather do that from Edina than Bloomington. Deb Man en From: jdeets @att.net Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 8:01 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Thank you for the support of figure skating in Edina! The Honorable James Hovland, Mayor of Edina, Thank you for the support of figure skating in Edina! Jennifer Deets (Maddie loves to skate!) Deb Man en nm: Tom Incantalupo <skoach92 @yahoo.com> t; Friday, August 09, 2013 10:13 AM Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: EHA and BCLFSC Resolution To: Edina City Council members in support of the BCLFSC From: Tom Incantalupo - Braemar City of Lakes figure Skating Club - Staff Coach Date: 8/9/13 Re: Edina City Council meeting on Monday, August 5th 2013 I would like to thank all of you for your time, energy and your obvious care you have given to the matter that was presented before you on Monday evening regarding EHA and BCLFSC. With the pressure the EHA attempted to apply, all of you were able to demonstrate a wisdom that is nothing short of remarkable by achieving a rational, fact based resolution that allows the Figure Skating Club to function to a major degree. There may be some difficulty for BCLFSC accommodating the higher level skaters and BCLFSC may be having to ask for more /additional ice -time in the future (especially with an Olympic year on the horizon), but because of your commitment to figure :„ a 1 ran to enntin„e training my higher level athletes at Braemar Arena before considering S&MID ', 1 1J1,1 Jul— Y, yr a•. uv .... -•� - - --- -p - - -- -- - - – - – another facility. I am grateful that all of you were able to see a bigger picture as to how this might impact our club. Comparing Figure Skating to Hockey, Golf to Football, Tennis to Basketball, etc. is just not possible as they are completely different sports, but you did not let this happen. I try not to get too involved with any type of political conflicts, but this was a conflict way too important not for me to share my concerns with you and, of course, my sincere gratification. If there is anything that I may be able to assist with in the future by offering a professionals' view of our sport, I would not hesitate. Respectfully, om Incantalupo TOM INCANTALUPO P.S.A. Master Rated in Freestyle P.S.A. Level V Ranking National & International Coach U.S.O.C. and DartfishQ Certified Video Analysis Technician Coaching since 1990 C: 651 - 270 -2206 W: 651 -368 -7838 e- mail: skoach92Caryahoo.com Coaching at Braemar Arena and Bloomington Ice Garden ALL AGES, ALL LEVELS, ALL DREAMS... Deb Man en From: Lina Garcia <lgarcia @usmayors.org> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 1:17 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Kay Scrimger; Lina Garcia; mayorsoffice @rochesterhills.org; Tom McClimon Subject: International Affairs Committee Chair Oakland Mayor Jean Quan: Report on Committee Meeting (August 2013) Attachments: KANE presentation.docx; Russian Olympics and LGBT.pdf August 9, 2013 TO: Members of the International Affairs Committee FROM: Mayor Jean Quan of Oakland, Chair of the Committee SUBJECT: Committee Meeting in Los Vegas, June 22, 2013 The International Affairs Committee met on Saturday afternoon, June 22, in Las Vegas at the U.S. Conference of Mayors' 81st Annual Meeting and considered a variety of international areas, including international trade and investment, nuclear disarmament, and international human rights. The committee passed the following policy resolutions: Advancing U.S. Metro Economic Growth through Collaboration and Trade in the Americas; • Promoting and Encouraging International Human Rights; • Calling for U.S. Leadership in Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons and Redirection of Military Spending to Domestic Needs; and • Calling on the U.S. Government to Support Free and Fair Elections in Venezuela and in All Countries. The Mexican Consul in Las Vegas Julian Adem discussed the strong trade relationships between the U.S. and Mexico and listed several promising product areas that will increase trade even more. David Fransen, Canadian Consul General in Los Angeles, emphasized the powerful and extensive trade relationship between the U.S. and Canada. Canada and the U.S. are the world's ' argest trading partners, with $742.5 billion in goods and services in 2012. Jackie Cabasso, Mayors for Peace North American Coordinator, discussed the most recent international efforts devoted to nuclear disarmament as well as the 8th General Conference of Mayors for Peace to be held August 3 -6, 2013, in Hiroshima, continuing Mayors for Peace' strong stand for a world without nuclear weapons. Mary D. Kane, President and CEO of Sister Cities International, described the variety of international city relationships her organization fosters in the 136 nations on six continents. At my request, Ms- Kane has provided a summary of her presentation at our committee meeting, which is attached. As mayors, we are always seeking opportunities to build global connections to create jobs and investment in our cities. I had the opportunity to travel to China in May 2011 to meet with business leaders in Beijing, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong as part of my city's efforts to attract additional trade and investment. Also, our new USCM President Mesa, AZ Mayor Scott Smith stopped by our committee meeting to discuss a resolution that he sponsored (Advancing Trade in the Americans, as listed above) and reiterated that one of his priorities as incoming President is to increase support for trade between the U.S., Canada and Mexico to help spur economic growth. I also wanted to call the committee's attention to my concern about the upcoming Winter Olympics to be held in Sochi, Russia, in 2014. Russian Parliament and President Vladamir Putin has made it clear that anyone who openly supports gay rights or is openly gay in public could be subjected to time in prison. I have written a letter to International Olympics Committee General Christophe de Kepper expressing my view that Olympic athletes may be ill treated and requesting that the IOC work with the Russian government to change its discriminatory laws or relocate the 2014 Olympics to another country. I am attaching my letter to this email. 2 I would like to thank all members of our committee for your continuing support and participation. Our committee meeting sparked much discussion on the resolutions. We look forward to seeing you at our January meeting in Washington DC to continue our consideration of these and other international issues. In the meantime, if you have any questions, comments or concerns, please contact the following USCM staff: Lina Garcia, Director of International Programs, 202 - 341 -6113 or 1 a� rcia(a usmayors.org or Kay Scrimger at 202 -861 -8772 or kscrimgergusmgyors.or . Presentation by Mary D. Kane, President and CEO, Sister Cities International United States Conference of Mayors, 81S` Annual Meeting June 22, 2013, Las Vegas, NV Sister Cities International was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower on September 11, 1956 at the White House conference on citizen diplomacy. The sister city network today is comprised of 500 U.S. cities with nearly 2,000 partnerships in 140 countries on six continents. Sister city relationships are grassroots - level, long -term connections that can be leveraged for the overall benefit of the community. Today, sister city relationships are key avenues for cities to connect globally. As cities today become hubs for export and import, movement of goods, and innovation, Sister Cities International firmly believes that these global connections help communities thrive. In recent years, the network is seeing a trend of more sister cities working together in the realm of business and trade. Several economic development opportunities are borne out of sister city connections. A prime example of a sister city connection leading to a business opportunity is that of Lakeland, FL and its sister city Chongming, China. In August 2011, ECON Inc., a Lakeland - based engineering firm with 22 employees, leveraged the city's sister relationship to receive a five -year, one billion U.S. dollar contract to build a theme park on Chongming Island. In addition to bringing in business and trade, global connections help communities reap countless benefits, including more jobs, better infrastructure, and international education programs for its youth. We encourage cities to strengthen and rejuvenate existing relationships and start new ones as an avenue for collaboration. In the coming years, Sister Cities International will continue to engage youth from all over the world through programs. We also look forward to growing relationships in the Middle East and North Africa. In this new era of citizen diplomacy, Sister Cities International has embraced technology. We are on Facebook and Twitter and we also have a new, interactive website — making us more accessible. The President of the Unites States has been the Honorary Chairperson of Sister Cities International since Eisenhower in 1956. This past January, we celebrated the inauguration of the President of the United States with the very first Sister Cities International Inaugural Gala. The Sister Cities International Inaugural Gala will now be a fixture every four years. In 2014, we will be hosting a U.S. -China sister city conference to celebrate the 35th anniversary of the first sister city relationship with China. We invite all Mayors to join us to mark this important milestone. As we connect globally, we thrive locally. Christophe De Kepper Director General International Olympic Committee ChAteau de Vidy 1007 Lausanne Switzerland Dear Mr. De Kepper, I am writing to you about the recent escalation of discrimination and violence against the LGBT community in Russia. The Russian Parliament and President Vladimir Putin have made it clear that anyone who openly supports gay rights or is openly gay in public could be subjected to time in prison. This raises huge concerns about the Winter Olympics being held in Sochi, Russia in 2014. Mr. Putnn has taken a number of actions hostile to the LGBT coninnuiity including a ban on the adoption of Russian children by gay couples, allowing the police to arrest gay or pro -gay tourists and allowing them to be detained for up to 14 clays and imposing fines on "homosexual propaganda," which includes any positive portrayal of gays. During the 2012 London Summer Olympics there were 21 openly gay and lesbian athletes who competed. If the Russian laws were enforced the 2014 Winter Olympic athletes could be subject to irnprisomuent. These policies are the antithesis of what the Olympic spirit represents, which according to your own website states, "Building a peaceful and better world-in the Olympic Spirit which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play." The Russian government's actions are also incompatible with the Olympic Charter's promotion of "human dignity," as well as a violation of Russia's international legal obligation to ensure non - discrimination and respect for freedom of expression. Your own Olympic Charter bars any form of discrimination and the IOC's role is explicitly "to act against any form of discrimination affecting the Olympic Movement" [Article 2(6) of the Charter]. The City of Oakland has sent 12 athletes the Olympics over the years, an illustrious list that includes Tiffany Chin, Stephen Clark, Peter Rocca, Marcus Jensen, Geoffi-ey Picard, Albert White, Archie Williams, Austin Sperry, Gary Payton, Brad Gilbert, Brad Gilbert and Buster Crabbe, Our City is one of the most diverse cities in America and we celebrate our differences and thrive on our individuality. We have strong anti - discrimination laws and as a conununity are appalled at the actions of the Russian government. I encourage you to work with the Russian govermnent in changing their discriminatory and repressive laws. If not, I strongly encourage you to find a new location for the 2014 Winter Olympics that celebrates the diversity of all people and upholds your own Olympic charter. I look forward to your reply. Sincerely, Mayor Jean Qrian • Sandra Cramer 4205 Chestnut Lane N.E. Prior Lake, MN 55372 August 9, 2013 Greetings: The Honorable James Hovland, Mayor of Edina, mail @edinamn.gov The Honorable Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Member, jonibennettl2 @comcast.net The Honorable Mary Brindle, Edina City Council Member, mbrindle @comcast.net Today I am attending a scrapbook weekend and I am reflecting of my daughter's year on Team Braemar. As I work on her Team Braemar year scrapbook I am remembering the great friendships she gained and the growth and confidence as a synchronized skater and individual skater. Even though we are Associate Members with Braemar, she still continues to skate on Wednesday's at Braemar with Coach Kathleen Gazich. We have been with Kathleen for three years now and she also continues being coach by Loni Keenan at Burnsville MN Valley Figure Skating Club. We became Associates with Braemar the year before joining Team Braemar and I can truly appreciate the growth Rachel has had of these two talented Coaches and the great year with Pam May and Toni Swiggum with Team Braemar. Rachel wants to be the best figure skater she can be so we go where the talented coaches are. Rachel is 16 years old and a Junior at Prior Lake High School this fall, she has been skating since she was four years old and wouldn't trade it for any other sport. She is dedicated and wanted to skate with the world renowned Team Braemar of Edina and a highly recognized club which is why we come from afar to skate. As we are not residents of Edina, I do have an interest in the ice time for my skater and want to write to thank you for your support in the Braemar City of Lake Figure Skating Club and the importance it has on the communities... not just Edina but other surrounding cities that want to have their skater skate with a wonderful club!! Sincerely, Sandra and Rachel Cramer (daughter) n.:— 1 „1— IIAN 2011 -2012 Team Braemar waiting for 2011 -2012 Team Braemar Novice Novice results!! 2 "d Place!!!! receiving their silver medals!!! Deb Mangen From: Kathleen Gazich <kathleen.gazich @gmail.com> on behalf of Kathleen Gazich <kgazich @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 5:28 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you for your service ' Dear Honorable James Hovland, I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all that you do for Edina. I am the Co -Head Professional and Lead Instructor (director) for the Skating School at Braemar Arena. I really feel that you did an excellent job of addressing the issues for ice allocation. There was no way to please both organizations and you were able to find some common ground. You have great mediation skills. I have attended the last two City Council meetings was it quite a learning experience on City government and I appreciate your service to this position. I appreciate the fact that a less drastic reduction in our ice was taken. I am hoping that we can still grow our program and give opportunities to future Edina figure skaters. I feel that the 20 year agreement that we made with the management needs to be upheld. It is sending the wrong message to our children that an agreement can be made and broken at a later date. It's like a bait and switch. Our money was accepted and no notice was received that our agreement was not a valid contract. Again, Thank you for your support of the Braemar City of Lake Figure Skating Club, Respectfully, Kathleen Gazich Deb Man en From: Bernie Beaver <bbeaver44 @gmail.com> .ant: Saturday, August 10, 2013 7:51 AM o: Edina Mail Subject: braemar Good vote re the figure 'skating club use of Braemar. . Not an easy one but it seems that the two sides should be able to compromise. 1 Deb Mangen From: wrh wrh <wrhdesign @hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 2:00 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mayor James B. Hovland important info Mayor James B. Hovland City of Edina, Minnesota 8/10/2013 Mayor Hovland: Recently, I read your most insightful and important quote in the Minneapolis StarTribune. why the light -rail line, freight trains and recreational trails couldn't run above ground and next to one another in the Kenilworth corridor, Wagenius replied, "That is not at all remotely on the table ". Actually this verbiage was recorded by an excellent.journalistic article by reporter Patrick Doyle at the Trib! In very practical reality of today's urban design principles concerning (TOD) Transportation Oriented Development, your viewpoint mayor is right on the money and very practical. Concerning the pragmatic and most economic approach to the very messy project called SW LRT, you have a solid opinion! Wagenius in my estimation is a city employee charged with publicity aiming for the elimination of DM &E railroad freight operations through the western lakes area of Minneapolis. The alternate and not -as -yet approved re -route through St. Louis Park could be a future transit advantage for the City of Edina! As the rail line running north and south through the cities of St. Louis Park and Edina owned and operated by the Canadian Pacific Railroad, has future possibility that will put the City of Edina on a world map of high- speed rail destinations. When I retired from the City of Minneapolis Engineering Services Division as a infrastructure land surveyor I decided to finally establish my own consultancy; William R. Hume Design (WRHDesign). I have a background in rail design and am one of America's leading writers concerning the future of high -speed rail in America. Please Google; william hume high speed rail. There you will find just a few of the many journalistic articles I have authored concerning the engineering design, operation, advantage and life- changing experience of true high -speed rail. I have been published in Washington, DC., in the (AAR) American Association of Railroads "Smartbrief daily news ". I have a very interesting and reachable design concept for the City of Edina using incredible high -speed rail. No other rail authority in the state of Minnesota has even dreamed of this concept. When an individual uniquely qualified such as myself with a background in engineering and journalism (BA degree English), has the practical construction experience and creativity to realize great infrastructure transit designs, some city will benefit greatly. Let us talk soon about what I can help in future planning for the excellent City of Edina! Best regards, Villiam William R. Hume Design 320 South Brunswick Avenue Golden Valley, Minnesota 55416 -1012 cell: 612- 205 -1962 e -mail: wrhdesign@hotmaii.com Deb Mangen From: USCM /Cochran <actionalert @usmayors.org> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 8:32 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: The August 12, 2013 edition of U.S.Mayor The August 12, 2013 edition of U.S.Mayor is now available at http://usmayors.org/usmayornewspaper/documents/08 12 13 Inside you will find: • Summer Leadership Meeting - Mayors to Washington: Partnership Needed for Jobs, Economic Growth, Built on Local Innovation • Bi- Partisan Support Builds in House for "Don't Mess with our Bonds" Coalition • HUD, Transportation Funding Bills Collapse in Congress • LED Lighting Will Save Independence $4 Million • President Obama Offers New Housing Proposals • Apply Now: $400,000 in Obesity Prevention Grants and so much more! To remove this e-mail address from this list, please go to h": / /usmUors.org /contactme and change your city's contact information accordingly. Deb Mangen lzrom: USCM /Cochran <actionalert@usmayors.org> rnt: Monday, August 12, 2013 11:44 AM o: Edina Mail Subject: Register for Mayors' Day Thursday, September 12 During Empowerment Week in Birmingham Attachments: MayorsEmpowermentWeek.pdf THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYO' 1620 EYE STMT NOR7 "HV Ul' WASHINGTON, 1 >.(: 20DO6 TELEPHONE (202) 293 -7330 FAX (202) 293 -2352 URL arw.�,usmarors.arF To: The Mayor From: Tom Cochran, CEO and Executive Director Birmingham Mayor William A. Bell, Sr. has invited all mayors to be with him in Birmingham during September 11 -15 to participate in Empowerment Week which will commemorate the 50th anniversary of the I)ombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church which killed four young girls as well as Birmingham's civil rights movement of 1963. Thursday September 12 will be mayors' day and will feature two panel discussions by mayors in the 16th Street Baptist Church — one on Reaching Economic Justice, the other on Building Tolerance. The U.S. Conference of Mayors Vice President Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson will preside at the events. Among the mayors participating in the panels will be Conference of Mayors Past President Michael Nutter of Philadelphia, Paul Soglin of Madison, Marilyn Strickland of Tacoma, Mitch Landrieu of New Orleans, Chris Cabaldon of West Sacramento and Greg Fisher of Louisville. We will have a press conference in front of the Church following the panel discussions and then go across the street to the Civil Rights Institute for a luncheon with an address by Charleston Mayor and Conference Past President Joe Riley. The day will begin with a breakfast at the Westin Hotel. Registration and hotel information are available on line at httn : / /usmayors.org/Empowermentl3. The number of rooms available is limited, so if you plan to attend please reserve your room as soon as possible. You will be able to reserve your room to stay on for other events during Empowerment Week. Mayor Bell will provide Mayors with access to all events. Please contact Mayor Bell's Chief of Staff, Chuck Fausch, at Erskin.Faush(ibbirminghamal.gov for information. Information on Empowerment Week is at 50yearsforward.com. Empowerment Week Schedule Birmingham officials are planning a full schedule for Empowerment Week: • Wednesday, September 11 will focus on Service, and include volunteer clean-up projects throughout the City. • Thursday, September 12 will focus on Reflection and include the mayors' panels. • Friday, September 13 will focus on Restoration and include sessions with members of Congress, mayors from other countries, civic and opinion leaders, and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. • Saturday, September 14 will focus on Reconciliation and will include Dr. Bill Cosby, filmmaker Spike Lee and other national arts, culture, and entertainment figures hosting a day of conversations and a screening on the civil rights movements and its effects. • Sunday, September 15 will focus on Commemoration and include an afternoon worship service, live theatrical events in several Birmingham parks, and other special events.. If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact the Conference's Public Safety Director Laura DeKoven Waxman at lwaxmanQa usmayors.org. or (202) 489 -7534. To remove this e-mail address from this list, please go to htt ./ /usmayors.org /contactme and change your city's contact information accordingly. The United States Conference of lvlayors Mayors' Empowerment Week September 11 -15, 2013 The Westin Hotel Birmingham, AL REGISTRATION FORM (You may register on line at hgp % %usmavors.or -aiEmpotinermentl3 or complete this registration form and fax to U.S. Conference of Mayors Meetings Department at 202 467 4276). (Any staff who accompanies a Mayor must register separately) NAME Organizati Address_ City Telephone, Email PrefelTed Name on Badge: Name of Partner /Accompanying Spouse: Fax Title State Zip Attendee has special needs: Yes_ No (If yes, USCM will contact) HOTEL INFORMATION Room reservations must be made by calling the hotel directly. Please identify yourself as an attendee of the U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting to ensure the group rate. A block of rooms has been set aside at the following hotel: The Westin Birmingham 2221 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. N. Birmingham, AL 1- 888 - 627 -7108 RATE/TAXES: $159.00 Single/Double Occupancy Taxes: 17.5 Reservations must be made before Seotember 4 2013 to receive the discounted rates. Rerservations made after the cutoff date of September 4, 2013 cannot be guaranteed at the discounted rate. Reservations may cancelled up to 72 hours without loss of first night's deposit. Please note that all NO SHOWS will be charged one (1) night's room deposit. Also any early departure fee of $50 will apply if you check prior to your confirmed checkout date. Please return this form to: The U.S. Conference of Mayors Attention: Carol Edwards 1620 Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 293 -7330 Fax: (202)467 -4276 Deb Mangen From: sbaer @mercatonai.com Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:37 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Emilie Kastner; Jesse Berst; Jim Whittaker, Chris Williams Subject: FW: Smart Cities Council Readiness Guide "Beta -Test' for Edina Attachments: How to Download the Readiness Guide.pdf Importance: High Hi Mayor Hovland and Emilie, I wanted to follow up with you to set a time for a kick off call with the Smart Cities Council Staff. Please let me know a time that suits your schedule in the next week if possible and I will send out a meeting invitation. Best regards, Sandy From: Chris Williams <cwilliams @mercatorxxi.com> Date: Monday, August 5, 2013 11:56 AM To: "Edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us" <Edinamail Pci.ed ina.mn.us> Cc: Sandra Baer <sandrabaer@mindsprine.com >, Jesse Berst < iesse .berst @GlobalSmartEnergv.com >, Jim Whittaker <iwhittaker @mercatorxxi.com> Subject: Smart Cities Council Readiness Guide "Beta- Test" for Edina Dear Mayor Hovland, We are pleased that Edina has agreed to help us beta -test the Smart Cities Council Readiness Guide. Our goal is to give you an early start in the process of becoming a smart city. This is a learning process for the Smart Cities Council (www.smartcitiescouncil.com) and for each city testing our Guide. To be clear about expectations, this exercise will help position your city for the next steps; in fact it should be the first step in your planning process. In turn, we are relying on your feedback to bridge the gap between our technological and subject matter expertise and your real world knowledge and experience. There is no fee associated with this testing; the Smart Cities Council appreciates your willingness to help us create a useful tool that will help your city and other municipalities across the globe. Importantly, we see technology as a means to an end. We rely on you to establish the end point you want to reach -- that is, to tell us your vision for your city and your unique strengths and priorities. With your goals at hand, we can then determine whether and when smart technology can help you get there. Our intent is to help you in the transformation process to enhance citizen services and the quality of life. Below, we outline the process and schedule for our Readiness Guide beta -test. Please review the process, and then respond to us with an email addressing the following three points: 1. Confirm that we have the appropriate point of contact. 2. Select a, Readiness Guide team from your staff who will be responsible for reading and reviewing the Readiness Guide. This team will be included in all of our calls throughout the testing period. 3. Set a time for a kick -off call (see below) with the SCC staff and your team as soon as possible. Readiness Guide Beta -Test Process: Kick -off call (Edina team and SCC staff) Time frame: week of August 5th The purpose of our kick -off call is to review all of the elements of the beta -test process outlined in this note. We want to put everyone on the same page about expectations and timing. We also want to get to know you! During this call, we will also identify a time for the midterm call. Midterm call (Edina team and SCC staff) Time Frame: week of August 19th The midterm call will allow us to connect with you and see how you are coming along with your read through and review of the Readiness Guide. We will not ask for specific feedback on this call; we will host this call to answer any questions you may have and ensure that you are making progress in the planning process. We will also identify a time for the Feedback call. Feedback call (Edina team and SCC staff) Suggested time: week of September 2nd The feedback call is the opportunity to deliver your specific feedback to the Readiness Guide. This call, and your preparation for it, will be incredibly valuable to us as we look to create a bridge between our technology experts and your real -world understanding of city and citizen needs. Here are the questions that we would like you to answer during this call: A. Is the Guide useful to you? How? How not? B. What elements are missing from the Guide? What could be added that would increase the Guide's usefulness to you? C. What did you find confusing? D. Do you think a completed Readiness Guide will help you plan and procure services to achieve your vision and objectives? Why, or why not? These questions can be answered over the phone, in an email note, or on the PDF of the Readiness Guide itself (see below, 'How to Download the Readiness Guide' for specific instructions). During this call, we will also identify a time for the Priority Setting call. Priority Setting for Mentoring Session call (Edina team and SCC staff) Time Frame: Week of September 9 The priority setting call is designed to make sure that you get the most from your mentoring session. The Smart Cities Council has an ecosystem of Partners and Advisors — experts who will mentor you based on your top priority decisions for innovation. We will learn of your priorities on this call and then select those Partners and Advisors with the most relevance to your agenda for your mentoring session. During this call, we will also identify a time for the Mentoring Session call. 2 Mentoring Session call (Edina team, SCC staff, and select SCC Partners) Time Frame: Month of October The mentoring session call is an opportunity for you to receive some expert guidance on a topic of your choosing from the experts themselves — our Partners and Advisors. Indeed, our Partners and Advisors will appreciate this opportunity to learn from you. They will be grateful to understand your problems and aspirations as they endeavor to determine how they can help. During this call, we will identify a time for a Final Follow -up call. Final Follow -up call (Edina team and SCC staff) To conclude our beta -test, we will have a final call to assess any additional feedback. In addition we will provide you the latest information about the SCC's formal launch of the Readiness Guide in November at the time of the Barcelona Smart Cities Expo and World Congress. With your permission, we will acknowledge Edina and express our appreciation for you contribution to shaping the Smart Cities Council Readiness Guide. How to Download the Readiness Guide Central to this entire process is, of course, the Readiness Guide. We have attached simple instructions for downloading and viewing the Readiness Guide. The Readiness Guide is hosted in Dropbox. Dropbox is, a straightforward file- sharing system that you can use for free. The attached instructions will walk you through the simple steps to downloading and reading the Readiness Guide. Please feel free to contact Chris Williams or Sandra Baer at any stage of this process with questions. Finally, kindly do not distribute the Readiness Guide or this note to anyone outside of your organization. We look forward to hearing back from you, and scheduling our beta -test kick -off call, at your earliest convenience. Best Regards, Christopher Williams Director of Research, Smart Cities Council / Mercator XXI, LLC Suite 800 1455 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC, 20004 202.349.2904 (w) 203.434.9007 (c) www.smartcitiescouncil.com / www.mercatorxxi.com Sandra Baer Principal Mercator XXI 1455 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20004 Mobile: 240.876.8131 Email: sbaer @mercatorxxi.com SmartC*it"iesCounci How to download the Readiness Guide The Readiness Guide is hosted in a file- sharing cloud called Dropbox. Dropbox is easy to use, easy to access, and free. Because the Readiness Guide is a large file with many images, and because we are still in test mode, the Guide is currently broken down into individual chapters. Let's get started! 1. Click the link below to go to Dropbox. Immediately below you will find a link to a Dropbox containing the chapters. Once you click it, your browser will open a Dropbox window containing all of the Readiness Guide chapters. Link to the Readiness Guide chapters in Dropbox 2. Click on the chapter you wish to review, then click the Download button. The chapter will open in a browser tab. On top is a bar with Dropbox at the left and a blue 'Download' button on the right. Click the "Download" button (shown below). Download 1i Ov Chrinopher Williams • 3. Save the file to your computer. To save you the trouble of constantly having to access our Dropbox just to read the Readiness Guide, save the file to a location of your preference on your computer once you have downloaded it. Optional: how to make edits to the actual Readiness Guide PDFs If you want to add comments directly to the PDFs of the Guide (the alternative is to verbally transmit them on the phone, or to write them in an email or a Word document), then please follow these additional steps. 4. Open the file with Adobe Reader. If you do not already have Adobe Reader, you may obtain it for free by clicking this link. In case you are new to Adobe Reader, we have provided detailed instructions for its use. 5. Read and comment on the text. a. In Adobe Reader, look in the top right. You will see 3 bars — 'Tools', 'Signs' and 'Comment'. Click on 'Comment'. Customize - Tools Sign I Comment b. If necessary, click on the Annotations pane under the 'Comment' bar to show Annotations functions (usually this pane is already expanded). Annotations QEP T T. I.A. 46 T 'b TO c. Use the Annotations functions to write your comment. The most helpful tool is the Text Correction Markup button in the lower right of the Annotation pane. It displays as a capital "T" with a star to the right. Now you can delete, insert and replace text as you would in a word processor. FO You may also want to make use of the 'Highlight text' function that lets you highlight a section and make a comment without changing the text. Click on the 'Highlight text' icon, which is second from the left on the top of the Annotations pane. It displays as a highlighter pen and yellow note with capital "T" inside. Select the text that you wish to comment upon. The text should now be highlighted yellow. Double click on the yellow text to bring forth a text box, and write your comment. 6. Save the file and email it to Chris Williams. If you have any questions, please contact SCC Research Director Chris Williams at cwilliams(a_)mercatorxxi.com or (202) 349 -2094. SCC Update August 2012 Page 2 Deb Mangen From: Nell Gelhaus <ngelhaus @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:00 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: HRC Honorary Committee Invite Attachments: Honorary Letter 2013.pdf Hello Mayor Hovland, I'm following up on the recent letter sent to you to be a part of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Honorary Committee for the 23rd Annual Twin Cities Dinner on Saturday, September 21; a copy of the invitation letter is attached. If you are interested in being part of this year's HRC Honorary Committee, please respond at your earliest convenience to Jason Bryan at kJasonb3(abgmail.com or by phone at 651- 592 -2803. Please feel free to let me know if you have questions or need additional information. Thanks! Nell Gelhaus Twin Cities HRC HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN® July 15 2013 Dear Friend of HRC: On behalf of the Twin Cities Human Rights Campaign (HRC), we invite you to become a member of the Honorary Committee for the 23rd Annual Twin Cities HRC Dinner on Saturday, September 2151 at the Minneapolis Hilton. We are anticipating 1,000+ HRC members and supporters to join us to make this year's theme — "Engage: Join the Momentum" — both a celebration of our victories this past year, as well as a call to action as we continue our work for equality on many fronts. We have much to celebrate! Since last year's Twin Cities HRC Dinner, Minnesota became the first state to defeat an anti - marriage constitutional amendment, and then went on to pass equal marriage for all. The US Supreme Court struck down California's Proposition 8, and ruled Section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional, creating Federal marriage recognition for same -sex couples in 13 states (plus D.C.). HRC's work also continues to pass the Employment Non - Discrimination Act (ENDA), to protect students from bullying, ensure equal access to healthcare, and strive for inclusive immigration reform. Joining the Honorary Committee lends your name to support HRC's work and puts you in the impressive company of elected officials as well as business, academic, religious and community leaders who have all served as previous Honorary Committee members. Becoming an Honorary Committee member is simple. We ask only that you purchase a dinner ticket (www.twincitiesdinner.org) and lend us the use of your name for the evening to promote GLBT equality. We also invite you to attend the VIP Reception at no extra cost, and mingle with other Honorary Committee members, corporate sponsors, and other HRC supporters. The VIP reception is from 5:00 PM to 6:00 pm with dinner following at 7:30 pm. To confirm your acceptance, sponsor a table, purchase additional tickets, or for any other questions, please contact K. Jason Bryan at 651 -592 -2803 or k.jasoiib3rgn ail.com. Thank you for your support of HRC! Sincerely, Corey Smith and Arouna Phommasouvanh 2013 HRC Twin Cities Dinner Committee Co- chairs The Human Rights Campaign is America's largest non - profit advocacy organization working to ensure basic equal rights for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender citizens. With more than 700,000 members from all walks of life, HRC's mission is, in part: "...to ensure that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans can be open, honest and safe at home, at work, and in the community. " PO Box 50608 A$inncapolis, MN 5540: wrb n- mm,.mcin cities TAR C.orq Deb Mangen From: Carl Schreiner <carl_aundria @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:20 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: [WARNING: MESSAGE ENCRYPTED - POSSIBLE VIRUS]Braemar followup - thank you Attachments: 2013 -08 -05 CC correspondence 3.pdf 2013 -08 -05 letter to city council.pdf Please forward this to Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland, Our family's 3 kids all figure skate and play hockey in Edina. All 3 were thrilled to meet you at the Mayor's Walk. They had to leave early to go to their figure skate competition. They represent Edina well, all 3 took first place. They will be representing Edina again this Fri and Sat at the MN State championship. Thank you for recognizing the value of the BCLFSC to Edina. I am concerned the motion the City Council approved 8/5 will deter future success of the Club. Ms Bennett's opening comment that the BCLFSC does not receive hours but pays full market price and that they are not a tenant but a co- founder was spot on. I wish it had resonated further with the Council. We experience both sides of this issue and it is hard to stomach the antagonist actions of Braemar management towards the BCLFSC. The 8/5 Priority Use Agreement proposal says, "In order to assist BCLFSC with the proposed transition, city staff would assist BCLFSC with securing ice time at other facilities in block scheduling that would allow BCLFSC to operate its programs and services." The Assumptions page shown at the 8/5 meeting said, "Arena General Manager will assist BCLFSC in obtaining blocks of hours at convenient facilities." Ms. Miller was asked what she has obtained, and she had nothing. She did say the EHA would be helping locate ice. My letter to the City Council from earlier 8/5 (attached - see points 5 &6) raised the suspicion that no good ice would be found and any offered would be junk. That is exactly what Ron Green, EHA president, included in his packet of info to the Council (attached - see page 32). North St Paul? Burnsville during the school day? The list is absolutely insincere and offensive. The language at the meeting of experimenting to see how many hours can be stripped from the Club without it imploding or moving was shocking. Since when has Edina been about minimal support for excellence? It is obvious that Ms. Miller and Ms. Kattreh want nothing more than to turn Braemar into a hockey only facility. This is not the Edina way. Our various sports need full support to thrive. The City Council will be re- visiting the $20 /user - 20 year agreements /board resolutions from both the EHA and BCLFSC. The EHA is receiving 800 hours /season from the Hornets Nest. That is great value for their $20 /user fee. Please ensure the approvals reflect concessions to the BCLFSC for their contributions to a project that does nothing to serve them. The BCLFSC board resolution is only asking for a promise to continue the status quo with some needed updates to the East rink that will benefit both figure skating and hockey. It is more that reasonable. The BCLFSC is a great neighbor to the EHA. Our kids would not have the hockey success they enjoy if it were not for the support of their BCLFSC instructors. The 4th rink proposal would bring much needed seasonal ice to the EHA - about 1000 hours /season by my estimate. Seasonal ice is a perfect solution for a seasonal renter as the City fights to minimize losses at Braemar. Please support this addition with the condition that the BCLFSC receives their full allotment of ice (quantity and time) back with no additional concessions from the BCLFSC. It will be a great trade for the EHA and allow them to show they are a good neighbor to the BCLFSC. Thank you for your service to Edina. Our kids are amazed at the length of time you spend on such a wide variety of issues. Thanks, 1 Carl Schreiner 5264 Lochloy Dr Edina, MN 55436 Carl Schreiner 612 -554 -1311 August 5, 2013 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am writing concerning the August 5, 2013 proposed Priority Use Policy for Braemar Arena. My family skates in the EHA and BCLFSC. The success of both organizations is important to us. The proposal should be rejected and the status quo maintained (page 6, option 1). There are a number of reasons why the proposed hasty and drastic shift of historic policy is premature and damaging. 1) Page 2 of the proposal indicates that the policy is attempting to recognize an official sport for Braemar Arena. Since when has the purpose of Priority Use Policies in Edina been to pit sport against sport? The Edina Youth Sports Task Force states "It is the City of Edina's view that the public is best served when there is only one independently incorporated youth athletic association per sport." It does not say one sport per facility or field. The proposal would set a destructive precedent that could pit soccer vs football vs lacrosse vs baseball, etc to become the popular, higher priority sport for Edina's various facilities and fields. Contention and elimination of sports would be the result. The City Council must recognize the historic contributions and importance of figure skating in Edina and continue to recognize a club /association as the official figure skating club for Edina. The BCLFSC is still the obvious and wise choice. Any Priority Use Policy the City Council approves must ensure the future success of the legacy sports of Edina. 2) Resident participation is mentioned frequently in the proposal. This or other apples to oranges comparisons should not be a factor to favor hockey or figure skating over the other. The EHA has 90 %+ residency because its governing body, Minnesota Hockey, requires it. The BCLFSC cannot be expected to maintain that % because its governing body, US Figure Skating, dictates that they have an open membership policy. This is very similar to the swim club scenario. The City did not use residency percentages to eliminate the sport, but set the % low enough to qualify an official club. Because Braemar Arena is an Enterprise facility, it could be reasoned that profitability of organizations should be the standard. This would shift the priority to organizations that rent consistent hours year round. The BCLFSC does, the EHA does not. However, just like a 90% residency policy is unfair to the BCLFSC, this standard would be unfair to the EHA because MH dictates their official season. The EHA and BCLFSC have successfully served Edina residents for 47 years at Braemar. The City should seek to help each Club without sabotaging the other. 3) The impact of the Hornets Nest and proposed 4th ice sheet has not been taken into account. Nowhere in the proposal are the training hours of either included in the calculations. Will the 4th ice sheet be an exclusive benefit to figure skating as the Hornets Nest was to hockey? Or will it be an additional blessing to the EHA, providing far more ice as compared to receiving BCLFSC hours in the East arena? How well would building additional seasonal ice sheets - ala Minnesota Made and St. Paul - satisfy the ice needs for Edina's skating clubs? 4) The proposal is giving Velocity Hockey Center a higher priority than an Edina Youth Athletic Association and equal priority to another and also priority over other organizations that have previously rented from Braemar. This is a dangerous precedent to set. Do we want for profit organizations to have priority access over our youth associations /clubs at Braemar and other City facilities and fields? Should a "new kid on the block" be allowed to trump historic renters? Should the City favor a for profit business with priority access when a direct competitor (Minnesota Made) is going at it alone? 5) The City staff and EHA president both state they support figure skating. Yet City staff is giving vague promises to help secure non - Braemar ice for the BCLFSC. None has been secured and there is no guarantee. And the EHA's offer to help schedule.ice is also non-reassuring, The EHA president said in an email to the City Council 8/2, "Both the City and EHA have offered to assist the Club with getting ice time that closely matches any hours they would lose at Braemar." If the EHA wants to take the cream of the ice that they don't control (Braemar ice), what makes the City Council think the EHA will give a comparable quality and quantity of ice to the BCLFSC for ice they, the EHA, controls? The EHA focus is on hockey and their own needs - as it should be. As they work to serve their membership, why would they give prime blocks of ice at other arenas to the BCLFSC? Braemar staff attitude is alarming. They are supposed to support hockey and figure skating, yet have no solid guarantee to replace ice needed by the BCLFSC. And we are to believe the BCLFSC will be able to survive and Braemar Arena will still have the Club call it its home? 6) Is there really available ice to be picked up? From the 8/2 email, "parents purchased additional ice once the teams were picked to supplement what the EHA provides (we estimate 500 -750 hours). Bottom line: Ice is available. And it's available in similar time blocks at other arenas." If this large quantity of prime time, nearby ice is available after hockey tryouts, why didn't the EHA reserve it in advance of the season? Why instead has the EHA rented ice at Mariucci and Ridder? Staff also mentions in the proposal that St Louis Park, Hopkins, and Richfield could accommodate ice times for the BCLFSC. We have never had an EHA practice at SLP: I do not recollect any EHA team being assigned ice at SLP. Why hasn't the EHA jumped on this "accommodative" ice? Once again, why would the EHA not secure prime time, nearby ice but instead leapfrog close arenas like SLID, Hopkins, and Richfield to buy ice at Mariucci and Ridder? Let's be honest, if the EHA hasn't been able to secure it, there isn't prime time, nearby ice for the BCLFSC to easily acquire. 7) City staff states in the June 11, 2013 Park Board minutes included in the proposal that "figure skaters can skate right after school because they can arrive at 3pm." Edina HS lets out at 3:10, Edina elementary schools let out at 3:05 and 3:50. These Edina residents cannot skate "right after school at 3pm." The Junior high schools get out at 2:40. Valley View students must rush over to make a 3pm time. I would not be comfortable committing to a 3pm time if my child was at South View. Such obvious misrepresentations by staff should be a warning to the City Council. 8) There is also the matter of the 20 year agreement to maintain BCLFSC ice times. From the Star Tribune 7/22, "The club agreed to pay $20 per year per member to help pay for new hockey locker rooms at Braemar, which was renovated last year. In return, the city said it would give the Skating Club priority scheduling for its current ice times. 'We want the city to honor our good -faith agreement,' Wright said. Said Miller: 'I'm not proud of that part of it.' If the city breaks the agreement..." Do we want to be known as a City whose word cannot be trusted? My family loves hockey and figure skating. I am grateful the City is willing to supplement the EHA for only renting ice part of the year. I am grateful the City supported the EHA's project to build the Hornets Nest. I am grateful the City is considering a proposal to add a 4th ice sheet. hope the City will continue to support hockey and the EHA. I am grateful the City has supported figure skating so well in the past. I am hopeful that figure skating and the BCLFSC will continue to be highly valued and supported by the City - not just in word, but in deed. I implore the City Council not to allow these organizational errors and tragic lack of vision to stain any part of the reputation of Edina and Braemar Arena. It would truly be a shame if the quality of programs in Edina was tainted by the loss of the internationally acclaimed Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club. Sincerely, Carl Schreiner 5264 Lochloy Dr Edina, MN 55436 CC: The Honorable James Hovland, Edina Mayor The Honorable Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Member The Honorable Mary Brindle, Edina City Council Member The Honorable Josh Sprague, Edina City Council Member The Honorable Ann Swenson, Edina City Council Member Mr. Scott Neal, Edina City Manager Ms. Ann Kattreh, Edina Parks and Recreation Director Deb Mangen From: Elaine Tarone <etarone @umn.edu> ent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 3:48 PM o: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: SAVE THE DATE: CARLA OPEN HOUSE • Tuesday, October 15, 2013 Dear Mayor Hovland, I am very pleased to invite you to join me in a small VIP reception at 3:00 pm Oct. 15 in the Minnesota Room in the McNamara Center to meet and chat with Mr. Clay Pell, the U.S. Dept. of Education Deputy Assistant Secretary for International and Foreign Language Education (Title VI). Title VI supports several centers at the University of Minnesota that whose goal is to improve the quality of language and culture learning in the state; one of those centers is CARLA. Mr. Pell, a strong advocate for language and culture learning in an internationalized curriculum, will be introduced by President Kaler as the invited speaker at CARLA's 20th Anniversary Open House, which will take place 4:00 -6:30 pm in Memorial Hall of the McNamara Center. I hope you will be able to stay for Mr. Pell's lecture and discussion, and the reception as well. Please RSVP to this email address to let me know whether you will be able to join me for this exciting event. In the event that you are unable to attend, and want to designate a representative from your office to replace you, please let me know who that will be. Best wishes, Elaine Tarone Director, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA) Trouble viewing this message? Read this message on the Web. 91.wo - Save the Date - CARLA's 20th Anniversary Open House and Invited Speaker Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4:00 — 6:30 p.m. Memorial Hall, McNamara Alumni Center 200 Oak St SE, Minneapolis, MN Clay Pell, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Internationa and Foreign Language Education (Title VI) in the U.S. Department of Education, will be the featured speake at this special event to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA). Mr. Pell's remarks will be followed by a reception featuring delicious food and informational booths highlighting CARLA- sponsored projects along with other Title VI centers on campus. Mark your calendar to join us in celebrating 20 years of supporting language learning! CARLA I Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA This email was sent by the Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition at the University of Minnesota, 331 17th Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414. To stop email communication from CARLA, please e -mail the center at carla @umn.edu. ©2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Elaine Tarone, Distinguished Teaching Professor and Director Center for Advanced Research in Language Acquisition (CARLA) Global Programs and Strategy Alliance University of Minnesota 331 17th Ave. S.E. Room 140 Mpls MN 55414 612- 625 -8882 ` SEPL `7 X42 ©1� August 12, 2013 Dear Governor Dayton, ay 1 have a concern for my well being that I 'm hoping someone may be able to consider and be able to remedy the cause. I'm an eighty -two year old resident of Edina. I have lived in my own home for fifty six years. I have been widowed for the last twenty -two years. I have been self sufficient all these years & enjoyed living in Edina without any major problems. However, now I have a major problem I did not create, nor have any way of changing the problem — I need your help and understanding. Problem — The increase in airplane noise over this area of Edina. The change in airplane noise has affected how we live and sleep. Conversations between neighbors & family inside or outside the house become impossible when the planes fly continuously. It is impossible, with frequencies as much as two to three times a minute, to hear the phone or TV because of noise. There are necessary noises that we citizens adjust to for our well being - garbage trucks, school buses, trucks, etc. — are a few + routine deliveries. These noises are different than the constant repeating all day noise of the airplanes overhead!! - many per minute. The airplane flyover could possibly be re- routed over the freeway or shopping centers in the area until they reach a higher altitude. To lose sleep in the morning with planes to wake you up rather than birds or an alarm clock is not a good way to start the day. And then have that noise continue many times an hour. In the many years I have enjoyed living in my home, I have never been so affected by the increased plane noise — due to the flight patterns. Hopefully you will help get these flight patterns adjusted and reduce the noise in our area. My only options to eliminate the affect of the noise on my life would be to MOVE or DIE! Each of these options is unacceptable to me. Please consider my request to make some changes in the flight patterns. Thank you. Sincerely, MaryAnn Lavoie Long time Edina resident at: 5712 York Ave. S. Edina, MN 55410 Cc. Mayor James Hovland C, zt 303 East Nicollet Boulevard Member 7373 France Ave. S. Suite 330 AMENIUNSOCIMOF ° °"" Suite 100 PIASMCAND FE NSMUCME Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 SURGEONS, INC Edina, Minnesota 55435 (952) 435 -0177 Fax: (952) 435 -6287 Joseph M. Gryskiewicz, M.D., FA.C.S. (952) 842 -1000 Fax: (952) 435 -6287 Web Site: www.tcplasticsurgerycom Board Certified Plastic Surgeon Web Site: www.tcplasticsurgerycom August 14, 2013 Edina City Hall Council Chambers ATTN: City Council Members 4801 W. 50'x' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council Members, / I am writing you regarding the Edina Masters Swim Team. I have been a faithful member on the swim team since 1990. I have had a business in Edina, Edina Plastic Surgery and now Gryskiewicz Twin Cities Cosmetic Surgery since 1985. I currently am a resident of Edina and have lived here since 1995. This is the first summer we were unable to swim outside at the beginning of the summer. Instead of starting the first week of June for outdoor swimming, we had to start the first week of August. We missed two months of outdoor swimming which I greatly anticipate during the long, cold winter. This was a huge disappointment to both myself as well as our coach Erich Welton and to my teammates. It is our understanding that many individuals participate in the use of the outdoor Edina pool in the summertime that do not live in Edina, but come from Eden Prairie. I don't think it is fair that we Edina residents should have to take the scraps off the table. We should be sitting at the table and have first choice with our swimming as opposed to people from other suburbs. I think the people from other suburbs should be relegated to either no pool use or pool use at other times and certainly we should be assured of the fun outdoor swimming with the morning sunrise like we have experienced over the past 23 years. Sincerely yours, ' 1. G64 ell ez Jo p M. Gryskiewicz, MD, FACS Past- President Minnesota Society of Plastic Surgeons, G• ` The Rhinoplasty Society, �:� SEAL The Aesthetic Society Education and Research Foundation (ASERF) Clinical Professor University of Minnesota '`!G, Cleft Palate and Craniofaeial Clinics School of Dentistry roe JMG /ts Hh House of History Make A Better Future Learn From The Past "Change is objective - Progress is subjective - Don't confuse the two -" R. Ernest Ladifor H16 1 bit House of History Make a Better Future -- Learnhnm the Past Robert E. Rofidal President 7125 Bristol B T re �'c varr A rAlk e Iva Edina, DIN 55435 -4109 IV��b Ste O' /S�QY 4� i 952- 807 -7102 bobrofida41e,com i iaa a if ap 7125 ' t "Boulevard * Edina * 55435 -4109 * 952- 927 -8594 * brofidal @comcast.net IMe. Aftaad sports AArA Back to school: _F M. ypS ficA. i. ir.ei iAAe enn.d. STARTRTBUNE.COM /LOCAL -'SECTION AA • WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14,201 si eYS_ 1 S eACe tl ®11 •. But redevelopment creates tension for some: _ Neighbors expressed thei 3y MARY JANE SMETANKA serious issue that faced the city ! displeasure ;metari(-a�startn"tiune.com' That's extraordinary, Morris told with the con - the City Council last week. ty e next , The struction of a e highest g P g �y 1 large house on most serious issue farm their area cities 25 ercent he said and n g city,. p vUY cc �RJ�Z r z r ' OaklawnAve- is and their most:frequent response ' in most ci4ies only about 6,percent -: ; /j �Ov��S n� rs ;' 4 nue in Edina is .:. "nothiii ;' can't,find a bone to`pick with their STr4Y " '. i. in 2007. Rede- That's right nothing 'E :hometown .` :,' 'z Edina surveys residents,- every,,; o JT «FjB 4RN(�ppS + �J - � r ` �a,u�z��, velopment, es eciall the P Y ..Those people are what Decision ,, . `� ttesources President Bill Morns calls: two years, as a way for the council -�;a : �• " 5 - ' increasing sizf „ community "boosters." When-his.' to track the opuiions of their city's ; 1 t �_ '`s of single -farm _, :� firmsurveyed Edina residents mJuly silent mijbhty ,While this year's,'; -: fi at .homes,remaii w and gave them the` chance to ham -: > survey showed that: residents are a concern for mer away, at their, city with whatever less likely to rate their quality of life • Edina resident criticism they wanted, 34.percent` t said:they couldn't_think".of a single Edina continues onAA6 star Tribune file 'The overarching theme ° 93 percent said.the city services they get in return _- -. The only city' ervices that residents were lake - : ' here is that the city is still regarded as a special place;' for property taxes are good Reside! ents warm about were the quay- ity and: taste of• drinking ,, Morris said. The only other or excellent. Morris said that was the highest satis- Edina water and street repair. '. city in the area with such high ratings is St. Louis Park, faction ranking with city Sri. Y Eighty four percent said -the ' would' like better y he said. services in the region. Though redevelopment really. 1S drmlang water, and 47 per- Other survey findings has been a controversial .; .` 'cent they�would`like better in • 84 percent of residents subject in Edina, 75 percent .: street repair ' said they felt they could of residents said they sup- The sury showed w- gro ing concerns aboufhivenile influence city affairs, which Ported continued redevel- opment. The most common • EDINA FROM AA1 crime and 'speeding, liutaa22 "could Morris said is 15 points higher than any other com- objection cited by the 18 p ercent of resideii }s think of no serious safety m tr'� percent who opposed rede- velopment was "houses are as "excellent" than they did _concerns.;Some'72 percent Edina schools area "Good too large." 'two ears Ago =, 73 percent Y .. g P. "did thus year, vs. -90 percent , "said there,isn t an area in the hue draw. schools" g was the top reason for mov- The telephone survey in 2011 — 99 percent still city where they.X§uld feel i`: unsafe,walkmg at,hight. ing to the city, and was cited in 400 randomly selected households, with a said likwas good or excel- lent.ui Edina. -' -.: Survey results show a by 35 percent of residents. Asked what city feature nonresponse rate of almost A hint at why that supe- population that generally "feels financially secure, is should be preserved for the 4 percent. ' rior rating faded was in the 10 ercent residents who P willing to pay more prop- ,. future, respondents men - tioned Edina High School Mary Jane Smetanka • 61.673 -7390 „of .said housing .teardowns e"rty taxes if they think its warranted, is pleased with second -most frequently. Twitter: @smetan -are' the ;most senous'issue facing, the city. Morris government services and • Almost half of residents said they thought their .said those' people .were_ more - feels more empowered than residents in any metro city property taxes are "about likely to call their quality of that Moms surveys. A large average;” 40 percent said life goo d,rather than excel- majority of people — 79 they are somewhat or very lent. - -- percent— said they intend high. Almost two- thirds of to live in Edina for over 10 respondents said they'd sup- port a tax increase if it was more years: needed to maintain city ser- vices at their current level. Deb Mangen From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Mayor Hovland— Broom, Sean <Sean.Broom @mail.house.gov> Thursday, August 15, 2013 9:39 AM Edina Mail Rep. Ellison RNAV Forum RNAV Forum 082713.pdf I've been remiss in not including you on the info on this forum. 8/27 in the evening Rep. Ellison will be hosting a forum about the future of RNAV implementation at the airport. The flyer for the event is attached. Feel free to contact me, or have any staff contact me at 612 -522 -1212 or 612 -72o -6233 or at this email address. Sean Broom Community Representative, District Scheduler Congressman Keith Ellison (MN 05) email: sean.broom(@mail.house.gov phone: 612- 522 -1212 Sign up for Congressman Ellison's e- newsletter! Follow the Congressman on Twitter and Facebook by clicking the links below: FCLL0WUSO.4 Find us on wikker ® Facebook Congressman Keith Ellison invites you to a forum to discuss implementing RNAV at Minneapolis-Saint..-Pau.1 Airport RNAV is technology used by airports and airlines to direct airplane flight patterns through our communities* Xhat it means fora, your familv, and your community Tuesday - August 27., 201.3 5 :30-7 :00 PM Washburn High School 201 W 49th St; Minneapolis, MN 55419 If you have any questions about this event, please call (612) 522 -1212. Deb Mangen From: wrh wrh <wrhdesign @hotmail.com> ►ent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 1:15 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you Mayor! WRHume Mayor James B. Hovland City of Edina, Minnesota Mayor Hovland (Jim) 8/15/2013 Thank you for your time in phone conversation recently. Regional and individual city planning for the future of public transit will be critical in enhancing the image and residential desirability of a suburb such as Edina! Advance planning and the proper public relations may demonstrate the advantages for a young couple selecting a neighborhood to establish a home. It is quality by association, in combination with a cities features that attract upper demographic families. It is not out of the realm of possibilities that Edina could lead the TC metropolitan area in forward transportation design and concept. In a rather entertaining manner in application of media; Edina could "hijack" so -to -speak all the focus of rail transport attention. The city of Edina could put the local populous on alert that huge leaps in transportation advancement are in the works! Best regards, William Hume cell: 612 - 205 -1962 e -mail: wrhdesign@hotmail.com Deb Mangen From: gerard greene <gerry.greene @gmail.com> Sent Thursday, August 15, 2013 1:49 PM To: Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle ( Comcast );joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: In Support of A Dome in Edina Dear Board Members, I am writing you to encourage your support for the Edina Dome project at Braemar. My family of 4 (Gerry - 47, Rhonda always 29), Paige (10) and Paddy (7) have lived in Edina, at 6108 Westridge Blvd, for the last 4 years. Our children play hockey, tennis, golf, touch football, and soccer, all in the confines of Edina. Our family quality of life would be greatly enhanced, as we would be able to utilize a local option for Winter training. We presently make 25 -30 trips a winter to Holy Angels dome. I am particularly encouraged by the indoor walking track proposal, which will have appeal to all ages of Edinaians. Anything the city does to mitigate the obesity epidemic is positive. I look forward to our city being named, at some point, as a desitnation place to live in a national publication. I encourage you to familiarize yourself into the financial aspects of the dome. I personally contributed to it, and see it operating at a breakeven with all the support from Baseball, Soccer, Lacrosse and Football. I think the financials were completed conservatively and accurately. The cooperation of many sporting associations was unprecedented. I look forward to your comments and your votes on the topic. Sincerely, The Greene family Gerry Greene 847 - 942 -6670 Berry. greenekgmail.com Deb Mangen From: Safety In the Park <safetyinthepark @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:57 PM Subject: Freight Rail Re -route This Week Freight Rail Re -route This Week Monday - Jami and Thom had conference call with Susan Haigh, Met Council Chair and Jim Brimeyer Met Council Representative for St. Louis Park. There is nothing drastically new to report. It was an opportunity for them to listen to our concerns that we articulated as: There is a true lack of public process on this whole project since the new route debuted (no hearings, no public study groups, just open houses) Lack of information since the new route debuted (no DEIS study, no derailment/noise /vibration studies, etc) The decision criteria that put four of the six co- location options on the shelf should really mean that the Brunswick central line be removed from consideration. Chair Haigh listened and said she would take the information under advisement. Representative Brimeyer mentioned that he could see our point when we discussed the third bullet point. Tuesday — Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority ( HCRRA) Meeting HCRRA Chair, Peter McLaughlin interrupted the presentation by Met Council engineer Mark Fuhrman to give a detailed HCRRA version of the freight rail history. This version was a litany of half - truths that created the misunderstandings, such as the TC &W railroad had earlier accepted the re- route. This misinformation wasted years of planning and cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars. County Commissioner Gail Dorfman focused on the press release letter by TC &W President, Mark Wegner from last. January. This letter points out that there was a possible re -route design in 2008 that was somewhat acceptable to TC &W. Dorfman wants Southwest Planning Office (SPO) to look for that design and discuss it again with TCW. Future meetings with Mark Wagner are in the works. We wonder, does a 2008 completed plan even exist? Had audience members been able to ask questions at the HCRRA meeting, Safety in the Park would have asked Commissioner Dorfman why Hennipin County had not looked for and found the 2008 design and used it in their SWLRT - Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The TC &W rejected the DEIS re -route design more that 18 months before the DEIS was issued. Wednesday - Corridor Management Committee (CMC) — This committee is made up of Mayors (or their representatives), three County Commissioners, some Met Council Members. City Council Member Jake Spano represents St. Louis Park. A full summary of the meeting can be found at http• / /www startribune com /locaUsouth/219707771..htni1? page = all &prepage= 1 &c=y#continue Points to highlight from the CMC meeting: Edina Mayor Hovland is the champion of St. Louis Park. His insistence to keep all of the, co- location options on the table could save SLP if the tunneling options are found to be impractical. We don't know why our Mayor won't speak up for our city or even attend the CMC the meetings. It is clear Hennepin County and Minneapolis have not given up on relocating freight though SLP SLP has two very expensive stations area "betterments" on the "wish list." Just in case we cant have both, residents should think about which would be more important to our community and let our City Council know their thoughts. 1.) Moving the Louisiana Station closer to Methodist Hospital 2.) Separating car /pedestrian traffic from freight/LRT traffic at Beltline Blvd. New important meeting dates (most times are not yet public): August 28 - 9:30 -11:30 CMC at SLP City Hall — Discussion of SWLRT issues including freight alignment September 4 - CMC - Finish discussion and give recommendation to the Met Council September 11 - Met Council will be given a presentation - (we don't know the content of presentation at this time) These last two meetings are the big ones. - Approval of scope and cost (all SWLRT including freight) September 23 — Met Council Transportation Committee September 25 - Met Council - final re- route /co- location decision Safety in the Park will have representatives at all of these meetings and issue updates. Deb Mangen From: Intergovernmental Affairs <LocalGovernment @who.eop.gov> ;ent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:58 PM -iubject: Invitation to a Local Leaders Call with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius - Tuesday, August 20 The White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs cordially invites you to join U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on a Local Leaders Call to discuss the Affordable Care Act and how state and local leaders can help expand access to quality, affordable health coverage for millions of Americans in the Health Insurance Marketplaces starting October 1. Call Information Date: Tuesday, August 20 Time: 1:00 pm EDT RSVP: Click here to RSVP and receive the call -in information This call is off the record and not for Dress purposes. We hope you will join us for this important discussion. Deb Mangen From: William Larson <cedarlake @q.com> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 5:56 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Southwest Light Rail and Edina Community Lutheran Connection Hi Jim, Rich and I are members at Edina Community Lutheran Church, like you. We read your recent comments in the Star Tribune recommending co- location of the new Southwest Light Rail line and freight line at grade with great interest. You see, this affects us directly, as we will lose our home if the co- location at grade occurs. About half of our condominium complex, Cedar Lake Shores, will be demolished to make room for both rail lines at grade. We recognize that the deep tunnel option is a very expensive option. As a fiscally responsible mayor, you would like to show that you can contain costs on this project. But unless you have visited our neighborhood recently, driven on Cedar Lake Parkway where it crosses the tracks during the 4 -6 pm rush hour, biked the Kennilworth Corridor, or enjoyed a dip in nearby Cedar Lake, it's easy to suggest the best option is to knock down a few homes to save some money building light rail. We ask you to not support going from this: To this: Jim, you probably are familiar with our neighborhood, but we cordially invite you to come over and have a glass of lemonade with us so we can show you our home and our neighborhood. Just let us know when you have a little time, and we'll set it up. Yours friends, Bill Larson and Rich Space Home: 612 - 928 -3030 Cell: 612- 310 -8476 3311 St. Paul Ave. Minneapolis Deb Mangen From: Xiaoxi lannsen <xiaoxijannsen @gmail.com> Sent Friday, August 16, 2013 8:19 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Letter to Mayor Hovland regarding airplane noise To who it may concern, Could you please forward the follwing message to Mayor Hovland? Dear Mayor Hovland, We are writing to you since we are deeply concerned with the current flight patterns traveling over our house on a daily basis. We have a large quantity of planes flying overhead almost every 3 -5 minutes every day for the past month. There are days when the planes travel together head to tail causing non -stop noise. During the summer, we have not seen a reprieve from this pattern. And in fact, we believe the number of planes flying overhead is increasing. We are concerned the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) flight tracker application is inaccurately recording flight paths. There have been many occurrences where flights are traveling directly overhead, but when the application displayed flights for the specific time period during which this occurred, there were supposedly no flights flying overhead. From July 11th to August 15th 2013, we have only had 5 days in this span where the planes did not fly near our home. The worst time in the day is from 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM — 7:00 PM, during which we endure constant head to tail noise. This diminishes our quality of life as it inhibits us from spending time outside. Can you please give pressure to FAA and MAC to avoid flying over our residential area? Instead, have FAA and /or MAC send more flights along highways and commercial /industrial regions. Would you please help us in this regard? Sincerely, Brad and Xiaoxi Jannsen 5701 York Ave S. Edina, MN 55410 (612)- 990 -1701 xiaoxi.iannsen@gmail.com 1 Deb Mangen From: aporter @refinedIIc.com Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:23 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: enelson @refinedllc.com Subject: New residential building code Please forward to Mayor and City Council Members: Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I understand at the upcoming City Council meeting you will be determining the final amendments to the residential building /zoning ordinances. The changes that you are planning to pass are, assumably, equal to or an improvement over the current ordinances. Is it not reasonable that we allow these "better" ordinance requirements asap? I understand why it is reasonable to allow the old ordinance through the end of the year, but isn't it logical to allow the new ordinance immediately as well if the applicant chooses? .... Of course, as long as the applicant doesn't apply for a blending of the old and the new ordinances. Please consider allowing the new ordinances to be implemented now and not mandate an outdated, less desireable ordinance through the end of the year. Thanks Andy Porter REFINED Cell: 612.991.9301 Fax: 952.303.3170 Email: aoorter(&RefinedLLC.com www.RefinedLLC.com Deb Mangen From: USCM /Cochran < actionalert= usmayors .org @mail27.atlll.rsgsv.net> on behalf of USCM /Cochran <actionalert @usmayors.org> Sent Friday, August 16, 2013 10:02 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Maximize Energy Savings- Tradition Energy Awarded New Energy Consulting & Management Services Contract Make sure your information is up -to -date. Click here to Update Your City's Contact Is this email not displaying correctly? Information. View it in your browser. THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS IG_D LYE S7'HF1 1, NORT11V1`U" a'ASI�Jf�i A, me NX" TFI Fa14ONT ("21 243.79;N) FAX UW) UKL: wmwanmary orb TO: The Mayor and City Representatives FROM: Tom Cochran, CEO and Executive Director As a founding sponsor of the U.S. Communities Government Purchasing Alliance, the U.S. Conference of Mayors is excited to announce that Tradition Energy has been awarded a three -year contract to-provide energy consulting and management services. This exclusive contract was awarded through a competitive solicitation process conducted by lead public agency City of Mesquite, TX and is eligible for use as of August 1 st. Join an upcoming webinar to learn more. The contract delivers services that will help cities maximize savings on energy expenditures, provide better budget and cost control, and improve procurement efficiency. Through the contract, Tradition Energy will provide a comprehensive suite of services, which include procurement for the following: electricity, natural gas, renewable energy and transportation fuels procurement aggregation, energy efficiency and facility management demand response /curtailment, energy data management and reporting energy bill processing and payment energy risk management, market research and intelligence reporting energy bill auditing and rate analysis Various energy services are offered in each state depending on the legislative and regulatory developments. To view services in your area, click here. Find out more by registering for an upcoming webinar. If you are unable to attend one of the webinar dates, contact Tradition Energy for additional information. Date: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 Time: 8:00 a.m. PDT /11:00 a.m. EDT Register Here Date: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. PDT /1:00 p.m. EDT Register Here If you have any questions about this contract, webinar, or the U.S. Communities Program, please contact Kathryn Kretschmer - Weyland with the Conference at 301 - 460 -5251. follow on Twitter I like us on Facebook I forward to a friend Copyright © 2013 United States Conference of Mayors, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you receive email updates from the U.S. Conference of Mayors. This email was sent to EdinaMail(a)ci.edina.mn.us why did 1 pet this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences United States Conference of Mayors • 1620 1 St., N.W. - 4th Floor - Washington, DC 20006 2 Deb Mangen From: Rick Windham <rick.windham @aol.com> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:58 AM To: James Hovland; Brian Olson; Jeff Frahm; rick.windham @aol.com Subject: New Street Driveway I live at 6233 Belmore lane and have asked several times that my driveway entrance be left intact, (I have two entrances.) I have recently found that I have been turned down for this request and would like to escalate the issue. My house sits on a large lot (approx. 200 ft square) and we have been in the house for 34 years in September. When we moved into the house there was a drive around the house that goes from a breezeway around the back of the house on a drive that was Class 5 crushed rock to the west side of the lot. The driveway was graded so that it is well defined. We use this driveway several times a year to move large items around the yard and a variety of other reasons. In addition our yard serves as a connection from the 400 block to the 300 block of John Street and walkers and bikers use the driveway to push strollers and other items while on a walk. The loss of the driveway will make this trail less convenient. The driveway entrance is not cracked or in anyway in need of repair, it is only being replaced because in the word of someone on the project, there cannot be a driveway to nowhere. Well we use the driveway and in our opinion it should not be replaced, as we will now not be able to enter the yard as we have bee able to do for all these years. In fact in the next few weeks, we will be having a tree removed and if we do not have the entrance, we will incur additional expense to get the equipment that the tree service needs to remove the tree. I would ask that the driveway be left in place, so that we continue to have access to our yard the way we always have. Rick Windham 6233 Belmore Lane 952 - 938 -8591 Deb Mangen From: Jeff Northrup <jeff. north rup @concordusa.com> Sent. Friday, August 16, 2013 12:17 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast. net ;joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail; James Hovland Subject. Dome Dear Mayor and Council Members, I just wanted to email you and show my support for the Dome and Field initiative. I am hoping that you will find a way to finally make this dream happen. I was born in Edina, raised in Edina, and currently live in Edina. I grew up playing Baseball, Football and Soccer on the very same fields that my four daughters play on. I am proud of our city, our programs, and our community. However, we, as a city, have not stayed current. We are far from the concept of "excellence" when it comes to the infrastructure of our athletic fields and facilities. My daughters are playing on fields that have had little or no changes since I played on them 30 years ago. Many are in rough shape and, quite frankly, are bordering on dangerous. Meanwhile, many of our neighboring communities have state of the art domes and turf fields that they can leverage for extended seasons and into the winter. Where Edina sits today is foreign territory for me. "Why doesn't Edina have a dome ? ", I am frequently asked by my Minnetonka and Eden Prairie friends. "Wow, the fields are in rough shape ", I hear from families at my kids' games. I am not used to defending Edina's excellence, or the pursuit thereof. Our pursuit of excellence is well known. Our schools are first rate. Our streets are plowed of snow faster than any other community. Our athletic programs hire the best coaches. Our arts programs are awesome. And our Hockey Team is the tali of the universe. But just take a visit to most of our practice and game fields during the spring and summer field sports seasons. When you walk them you can see with your own eyes some of the overcrowding, over - utilization, and poor conditions. Here are some things to consider: Our fields are in disrepair. Many of them were built on dumping grounds for Minneapolis street and curb waste and are almost impossible to improve through irrigation or landscaping. Garden Park, for example, has about 3 inches of top soil on top of asphalt and cement. Others are built on swamps or in lowlands. Creek Valley is sinking and looks like a rippled carpet right now. Meanwhile, Walnut Ridge is barely above the water table. This spring, most of my kids' soccer practices were cancelled — not because of inclement weather, but because of saturated fields. Our fields are in high demand and in short supply. We don't have enough field space. And much of the field space that we do have access to is in disrepair and /or over - utilized. Who could have known 50 years ago that soccer and lacrosse would have, literally, thousands of Edina kids playing? And yet, as a parent, what is our option? Realistically it is a screen. Yes a screen in the form of a TV, Computer, video game, Instagram, or Facebook. Parents are desperately trying to keep their kids healthy and active by minimizing screen time. How do we do that? We sign them up for athletics, music, and arts programs. We need more (and better) field options so that our kids can stay healthy and active. We are trying to stay competitive. Our families measure wins and losses. When we compete against other communities, we care about the outcome. Probably too much, to be honest. But that "excellence expectation" is woven into us in Edina. The fact is, other communities have better training facilities — better fields and a dome to train in the winter. Sports are year round now. We can argue whether or not that is a good reality or not. But it is a fact. Our soccer players are training year round. Same for hockey, baseball, softball, lacrosse, and other sports. We need a dome. There -is no opposition (not really, anyway). Who is organizing to oppose a dome that everyone in the community can use? There are no neighbors to the Braemar site who can complain. There are no Screen - Time - Advocacy- Groups that oppose healthy, active kids. In fact, I would guess that the only opposition you will get to this initiative is the typical financial opponents who don't want the city to spend money on anything (hyperbole, I know). But that should not stop us. We need this dome. We need better fields. This is good for Edina, it's residents, and its future. With no real opposition, why kick this can down the road any longer? I hope I have illustrated some valid, and even less obvious, reasons why this dome and field initiative is important. I am hoping that the City Council will vote to finance the "wide- footprint" dome that the Park and Rec has proposed, will finance some field improvements immediately, and will make future field improvements a major priority as we keep our city striving for excellence. Thank you for your work. Please reach out to me if I can help in any way. Jeff Northrup 5221 Wooddale Ave Class of 1990, EHS Husband, Father, Coach, Volunteer, CEO p 952.241.1002 m 612.910.0833 e jell @concordusa.com CO. CONCORD IT problems: meet old-fashioned wor.k ethic. 509 2nd Avenue South I Hopkins, MN 55343 1 www.concordusa.com This message and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the designated recipient and may contain attorney - client privileged, proprietary or otherwise private information. Unauthorized use, copying or distribution of this e-mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. if you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original and any attachments. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION o� a i To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: August 20, 2013 Subject: Correspondence Received After Packet Action Requested: No action is necessary. :�___-.A9U Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the Council's packet was distributed Friday. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 5700 Abbott Ave. S Aug. 15, 2013 ��r mrs . Bennett Edina Councilwoman Dear Mrs. Bennett: EDINA, Mn 55410 I meant to write you immediately but after all the carax accidetnts rear ended at a red light, etc. 3 times hit by drunk, once head on another rear ended and 3rd car (mine) parked, slid over to get something out of the glove compartment a dunk smashed into the DRIVERS door!!!! But I KNOW constitutional law which is something most politicians do not know, or care. See enclosesure of quote an d response of the nat who ran for governor last time. Not only does the constitution say ones home and properly is "sacred" but that even includes mail -- posting, etc. Even you -- and that is surprising as generally WOMEN know more anout the law than others -- even you says free speecg h, or political seepch.is EXEMPT. IT IS NOT. Please don't yell fire in a crowded thearher and please don't try to enter a home saying it is your right in of free speech to do-so to give opionins of politics, religion or whatever else. CONSTITUTION FORBIDS IF and this has been upheld by many, many, many Supreme court rulings. Years ago whem the Democrats kept sending junk mail and would not stop, I called SEn. Wellstone -- he agreed it is unconstitutional when notified (as I had on phone and in writing many times).He got it stopped and only a few times since have the disregarded. On the other hand for 20 yeas CONSTANLTY the Republicans and Ehrhart, etc wog NOT STOP. F na1 ly took to Rep. party to court. They lost $ X3(=(aaaX $ 5000 dp;;ars. Offer to settle for cost of going to court -- cab to and from St. Paul, etc. They said, in effect we'll show you. They oriceeded ti get a transfer to district court aned kept making motions thi by law I had to have a n attorney to answer -- kept it up ti 1 my costs were abouu $ 15,000. Yest $ 15,000 -- on a yearly income of $ 14,000. And 20k years ago took Edina Realty to district court withi copies of the constituition, many letters begging to stop, pictures of the junk on my door, copies of supereme U.S. court from the 40s and on and the judge (thnk god now dead) said as -he handed the exhibits back, via the assistant these are NOT RELEVANT in the start oe fMinnesota. And tl this day the crooked Edina Realty, in my opinion crooked) keeps the mailings up and in legalese threatenecd to bankrupt me if took them to court-! Tell me I should be calm. Even EDINA is too scared to do anything to enforce the ordinance the passed -- used my tax money to do so -- and the nice Michele at the police dept sayin last year, no use to call us. We can't do a thing. Of course they cannot set the pace for the use oa a person home -- Only the owner can -- but the courts here will nto endforce that or if they do the companies will take a disabled person such as I to court with the explicit intent to BAN KRUOT THEM.- Difficult as it is at my age and state of health to move, if you can tell we a state in which the U.S. COnstituionis relevant, I will try to move these HELP. nvrp Please fr fprgive typing errors, do not mistake them for lack of clarity of thought. Just the result of Multiple Sclerosis since age 18 -- complieated by heart problem, melanoma in the 80s and spinal stenosis and multitudg car accidents. AND by beloved IBM selectric in nearly 50 years old and needd needs a bit of help. Right now. with Penn Ave. such a mess I haven't feen able to find anyone who can even take it there for me. I do not mean to whine -- but it is not too mcuh to expect the local or state or federal goverment to follow the constitution -- especially parts are are EURE MELY CLEAR and no obscure or debatable. Everyone seems to believe and I with them that this country 00 - -- givernment fedler, state or local is run by whoemever has the most money to vuy variance (lot line to lot ine for housing) placards, written advertising. What I can't figure out ifs why any gov't even China lends money to such a country, or what the heck they owould want with it when the simply take it over in bankruptcy! But please know you nor anyone else has the free speech right to press political, religious, orpurchase info on any private phone, or private home. And though there is no law against it, except perhaps moral, to spend education money for preschoolers to learn to puch buttons -- and never to learn history, or how to read -- or even how TO WRITE THEIR OWN NAMES is SAD at best. If you need the full caopy of the 1969 Supreme court to *ling let me know, I have copid it byt only included a few pages. YOU will have to get a copy of the constitution from a libarary befeore all the books are burned and only button pushing is available. Take care of cyourself, as I would jusge you as a caring person. ANOT-11,99- VIEW D , E ear s les �� .MUM vatiy " ! . but. - qPq 1s Ike ; "t tiQ4ia1 nor JwOkdn into the Suprem r Claw of. tbe Xqn n; w. l ich provides that federal laws khaU, �e O supreme Lave,of the I ,» # 4 in a state's constit is to the eor; When i aes a b es t e.fi.4W e i n 1858,, , it signed ,on to this fog of inn . G City of Edina Trades and Occupations 1315.03 Section 1315 - Deposit of Advertising Material on Residential Property 1315.01 Deposit of Advertising Handbills, Advertising Circulars, Advertising Material Prohibited. Any resident of the City who wishes to exclude the deposit of advertising handbills, advertising circulars and other advertising material from the premises occupied by the resident may place upon or near the front entrance to the premises a printed placard or sign bearing the following notice: "Depositing of Handbills, Circulars, Advertising Material Prohibited." The .placard or sign shall be of the same minimum size and bear the same minimum size printing as provided in Subsection 1310.02 of this Code. 1315.02 Shall Not Deface Placard. No person other than the person occupying the premises shall remove, injure or deface the placard or sign. 1315 -03 Shall Not Enter. No person shall enter upon any premises where such a sign or placard is placed and deposit any advertising handbills, advertising circulars or other advertising material. --I ' 7nd adopted 7 -22 -71 City of Edina Trades and Occupations 1315.03 Section 1315 - Deposit of Advertising Material on Residential Property 1315.01 Deposit of Advertising Handbills, Advertising Circulars, Advertising Material Prohibited. Any resident of the City who wishes to exclude the deposit of advertising handbills, advertising circulars and other advertising material from the premises occupied by the resident may place upon or near the front entrance to the premises a printed placard or sign bearing the following notice: "Depositing of Handbills, Circulars, Advertising Material Prohibited." The.placard or sign shall be of the same minimum size and bear the same minimum size printing as provided in Subsection 1310.02 of this Code. 1315.02 Shall Not Deface Placard. No person other than the person occupying the premises shall remove, injure or deface the placard or sign. 1315.03 Shall Not Enter. No person shall enter upon any premises where such a sign or placard is placed and deposit -any advertising handbills, advertising circulars or other advertising material. History: Ord 1304 adopted 7 -22 -71 c I Opininn of I lir. Court 397 U. S. The appellants also contend that the requirement that the sender remove the addressee's name from all mailing lists in his possession violates the Fifth Amend- ment because it constitutes a taking without due proc- ess of law. The appellants are not prohibiter) from using, selling, or exchanging their mailing lists; they are simply required to delete the names of the complaining addressees from the lists and cease all mailings to those persons. Appellants next contend that compliance with the statute is confiscatory because the costs attending re- moval of the names are prohibitive. We agree with the conclusion of the District Court that the "burden does not amount- to "-a-- violation of due process guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. Partic- ularly when in the context presently before this Court it is being applied to commercial enterprises." 300 F. Stipp., at 1041. See California State Auto Ins. Bureau A% Maloney, 341 U. S. 105 (1051). There is no merit to the appellants' allegations that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. A statute is fatally vague only when it exposes a potential actor to some risk or detriment without giving him fair tvarn- ing of the nature of the proscribed conduct. United Stntes. v. Cardiff, 344 U. S. 174, 176 (1953). IIere the appellants know precisely Miat they must do on receipt of a- prohibitory order. The complainants' names must he removed from the sender's mailing lists alit) lie must refrain from future mailings to the named addressees. The sender is exposed to a contempt sanction only if lie continues to mail to a particular addressee after admin- istrative and judicial proceedings. Appellants run no substantial risk of miscalculation. For,the reasons stated, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. It is so ordered. 18 years old,.from receiving political, religious, or other materials that tine parents find offensive. In my view, a; statute so construed and applied is not without con - �'` stitutional difficulties. Cf. Tinker v. Des 111oi7les School 'Dist., 393 U.-S.- 503 (1069); Ginsberg v. New York, 390 629,, (1968). In this case, however, there is no ! particularized attack upon the constitutionality of slib- section (g), nor, indeed, is.there any indication on this record that under § 4009 (g) children in their late teens, have been un�iIillingly deprived of the opportunity to: receive materials:•; In; these circumstances,. I understand the Court to leave open the question of the right of older children to. •receive.materials through.thd mail. without governmental.. -interference and also :'tile 'more specific• question wliether § 4009 (g)• may constitutionally be ap- plied with respect' to all materials and to all children under 19. ' '. 16q 728 BRENNAN, J.,. concurring A4R. JUSTICl BRENNAN, «'ltll Whom ?,,Tn. JUSTICE I° .4;. i. DOUGLAS joins, concurring. Join the Court's opinion but add a fete words. I ;T r•. agree that 39 U. S. C. § 4009 (1964 ed., Stipp. IV) is constitutional insofar as it permits an addressee to re- it mailer to remove his name from its mailing lists 't! quire and to stop all future mailings to the addressee. As the =.: Court notes, however, subsection (g) of § 4009 also allows in- an addressee to request the Postmaster General to is chide in any prohibitory order "tile names of any of his children who have not attained their nineteenth minor bi'rtliday, and who reside with the addressee." In light of the broad interpretation that the Court assigns to 94009, and see ante, at 738, the possibility exists that parents could prevent their children, even if they are 18 years old,.from receiving political, religious, or other materials that tine parents find offensive. In my view, a; statute so construed and applied is not without con - �'` stitutional difficulties. Cf. Tinker v. Des 111oi7les School 'Dist., 393 U.-S.- 503 (1069); Ginsberg v. New York, 390 629,, (1968). In this case, however, there is no ! particularized attack upon the constitutionality of slib- section (g), nor, indeed, is.there any indication on this record that under § 4009 (g) children in their late teens, have been un�iIillingly deprived of the opportunity to: receive materials:•; In; these circumstances,. I understand the Court to leave open the question of the right of older children to. •receive.materials through.thd mail. without governmental.. -interference and also :'tile 'more specific• question wliether § 4009 (g)• may constitutionally be ap- plied with respect' to all materials and to all children under 19. ' '. 16q 736 OCTOBER TERM, 1969 Opinion of the Court 397 U. S. Without doubt the public postal system is an indispensa- ble. adjunct of every civilized society and communication is imperative to a healthy social order. But the right of every person "to be let alone" must be placed in the scales with the right of others to communicate. In today's complex society we are inescapably captive audiences for many purposes, but a sufficient measure of individual autonomy must survive "to permit every house- holder to exercise control over unwanted mail. To make the householder the exclusive and final judge of what will cross his threshold undoubtedly has the effect of impeding the flow of ideas, information, and arguments that, ideally, ' he should I receive and consider. Today's merchandising:methods, the plethora of mass mailings subsidized by low•postal rates, and the growth of the sale of large mailing -ljsts as an industry in itself have changed the m9*iIrrian` from a 'carrier of primarily private com- munications,.as he was in a more leisurely day, and have made him an adjunct of the mass mailer who sends unsolicited and often unwanted mail into every home. It.'places no'strain' on the doctrine of judicial notice to observe that whether measured by nieces or pounds, Everyman's mail today is made up overwhelmingly of material he did not seek from persons lie sloes not know. And all too often it is matter he finds offensive. In Martin V. Struthers, 319 U. S. 141 (1943), Mx. JusTicE BLAcx, for the Court, while supporting the "(f]reedom to distribute information to every citizen," id., at 146, acknowledged a limitation in terms of leav- ing "with' the homeowner himself" the power to deckle "whether distributors of literature may lawfully call at a home. ". Id., at 148. Weighing the highly important right to communicate, but without trying to determine where it fits•into constitutional imperatives, against the very basic right to be free from sights, sounds, and tangi- ble. matter we do not want, it' seems to us that a mailer's R.UWAlV V. rU01 Vl'1'iV� ..--- -• 728 Opinion of tho Court right to communicate must stag at the mailbox of an unreceptive addressee. The Court has traditionally respected the right of a Householder to bar,'by order or notice, solicitors, hawkers, ,and peddlers,from his property.' . See.Afa.rti -n v. Struthers, 'su'pra; cf: Hall v.'Coinmonwealth,! 188 Va. 72, 49 S. E. 2d 36cJ,. appeal::dismissed m , 335 U. S. 875 (1948). In this case-the ailer's,•right to communicate is circumscribed only by an affirmative act of,the addressee giving notice that he wishes no further mailings: from that mailer. To iliold leis. would tend to license a form. of trespass and would -make hardly more sense than to say that' a .:'radio or television.viewer may not twist the-dial to cut off .an offensive.-6r boring communication and thus bar its en= t ring his home Nothing in the..Constitution compels us s'to listen- to;'or, view any umvantsd: communication, what- ever 'its merit—we see no basis for, according the printed word. or pietures ' a- different, or more preferred status because, they': iire: -sent by mail : The: ancient concept •'that "a man's home is his castle'.' into which "not' even the .:king may enter" has lost none of its vitality, and none of the recognized exceptions includes any right to com- !municate *offensively with another. See Camara v.. Jlfu : nicipal Court, 387 U. S. 523 (1967). Botli the-: absoluteness of the citizen's right under 400J *and .ifis* finality are essential; what may not be provocative 'to• one person may well be to another. In operative: effect the power of the'householder under the :statute is 'unlimited; lie may" prohibit the mailing of a dry goods catalog because:he objects to the con- tents—or in the text of -the language touting the merchandise.. Congress provided this sweeping power not only to! protect privacy but to avoid possible con - stitutional .questions that. might . arise from vesting the power to make any' discretionary evaluation of the material in a governmental official. . Jean Lehner 5700 Abbott Avenue South Edina, ANN 55410 RC: Your recent solicitations To Whom It May Concern: The purpose of this letter is to advise you to cease sending mail solicitations to my home at 5700 Abbott Avenue South, Edina, MN 55410 and to instruct you to remove my name from your mailing list. I consider each piece of mail solicitation I receive from you to be a violation of my constitutional rights, a disregard of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, and a trespass. The use of my property to receive your mailings will incur a $500.00 fee for each use of my property. You do not need to contact me. Your continuing to send unwanted mail will signify your acceptance of my terms and rates. If you continue to send me unwanted mail, I will charge you $500.00 per piece of mail each time. I will invoice you each time that 1 receive a piece of mail, such invoice to be net thirty (30) days. In the event that I have to commence collection efforts, please be advised that I will seek attorney's fees and related costs of collection. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Jean Leaner P.S. Concerning phone violations, please know that there is a federal law which states if you call AGAIN after being warned or told not to do so, there is a $500.00 charge for the first call and $1500.00 for each call thereafter. NOTE: Repeat violations by mail will be charged the same as the federal law for phone trespass violations - $500.00 the first violation after being warned and $1500.00 Im every violation after that. ABOUT THE AUTHOR (by H.M.W) Jean Lettner received her Bachelor of Arts Degree from the College of St. Teresa, and later did graduate work at the University of Minnesota, Her first MS attack (although not recognized for what it was) took place when she was only an 18 -year old college senior, but because she had, since the age of 10, been known to have a heart murmur associated with rheumatic fever, it was rashly assumed that her symptoms resulted from overwork and other stresses. During the ensuing years she built a successful career in the travel industry despite constantly recurring problems with her balance, reduction of feeling in her right side, and other equally debilitating symptoms; which again were attributed to overwork. Undaunted, in 1969 she opened her own travel agency. In 1975 she chanced on a newspaper article about MS, which described exactly the symptoms which had been plaguing her over the years! Now fortified with the certain knowledge that she was indeed an MS victim, she wrote her doctor asking that during her upcoming annual examination he take special care to consider the likely presence of MS. To her astonishment, she was rebuffed and told that her problem was "adrenal exhaustion ". Shortly after this, she lost both her sight and the ability to stand unassisted. After hospitalization and numerous tests, the diagnosis was made official: MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. Although carefully following the advice of her neurologists and taking the prescribed medications religiously, she became convinced that her condition was actually worsening, because of the side effects of the FDA- approved drugs. During this period she somehow found (with a cane's assistance and sight recovery) the determination to Honor her commitments to escort groups to Russia, Europe, the Orient, etc. In the face of further degeneration, she reluctantly declined official speaking invitations from the governments of Australia and China, handed her hard -won group business to competitors, and sold her travel agency. Now freed from concern for her clients she was, with the knowledge gained from the study and experience of her own case, able to divert all of her energies to finding a natural way to fight MS. In the years while doing so, she succeeded in restoring her health and vitality to the extent that after many years, she can now walk one and a half miles in 30 minutes, unaided and threw away her canes long ago! This booklet is a summary of the knowledge she has painstakingly acquired, and which has been instrumental in returning herself and others to a nonnal life. 8/13/2000 PREFACE © 2000 Jean Lettner Multiple Sclerosis is an asymptomatic disease. This means that the disease and its rlmnaging effects may be present even though its symptoms are not. Thus, it is almost certain that during periods of apparent dormancy or remission, the insidious and relentless assaults persist, and the disease should therefore continue to be confronted using every non -toxic means available. Remission, with its usual absence of symptoms, is not necessarily a signal that all is well, and should not be the time to relax our efforts. Rather remission should be seized upon as a heaven -sent opportunity to protect undamaged myelin sheath. A combination of prudent lifestyle, diet changes and correct, consistent, appropriate supplementation may ensure that other necessary repair and rebuilding be accomplished. Other, more familiar asymptomatic diseases (often referred to as silent killers) are high blood pressure, many forms of heart disease, osteoporosis and cancer. Often when discovered, they are so entrenched that recovery is unlikely. However, those among us battling MS are often luckier, because we may become aware of MS and its attendant problems in sufficient time to take judicious corrective measures. It is not an overstatement to say reducing or ceasing the battle with MS during remission, is the equivalent of surrendering your weapons and turning your back on a well armed intruder. STAY ON THE OFFENSIVE. Never give up. Jean Lettner Author 2 Deb Mangen From: Lynn Laaksonen <goldielax @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 1:38 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennetl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: oppose subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass Edina City Council members, As residents of Indian Hills for the last 36 years my husband and I strongly oppose the subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass. Through the years we have come to appreciate the size of our property (over 1 acre) even more than we did when we first moved here to start our family. We have seen most of the neighboring houses torn down and replaced by bigger homes but because of the size of our property and the wild area between the homes, we aren't in the same situation as the Country Club area. I wish we all had 2 acre lots. About 20 years ago there was a proposal to subdivide 6520 Indian Hills Road which we opposed and the subdivision was denied. The threat at the time was a warning about the massive size of the house that would be built. Well, a massive house was built — it has subsequently been torn down and another big house replaced it — but it was ok because the property was big enough to support it and still allow wild area and not be intrusive on the neighborhood. Please deny this current subdivision request and allow Indian Hills to remain the neighborhood that families want to move to because it is in Edina and it allows them the size home they want and property that gives them the space and privacy to enjoy Edina at its best. Thank you, Kay and Lynn Laaksonen 6404 Indian Hills Road Deb Mangen From: Jeanette Colby <jmcolby @earthlink.net> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:43 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: IQAA Position Statement on SWLRT, July 1, 2013 Attachments: LRT KIAA Position Against Co- location.docx Please direct this email to Mayor James Hovland Dear Mayor Hovland, The Kenwood Isles Area Association (KIAA) understands the difficulty the Corridor Management Committee faces as you consider the long- standing problem of re- routing the freight rail to make room for the SWLRT. We appreciate that the Project Office has been very creative in its effort to find a solution. KIAA, however, continues to oppose at -grade "co- location." We ask that you please take the time to read our attached position statement. Even though many KIAA residents think this LPA route is not ideal, we have worked cooperatively and in the spirit of compromise to make the SWLRT the best it can be. If the Met Council now proposes to co- locate freight and LRT, after years of policy and promises that freight would be relocated, Kenwood Isles residents would find this a significant breach of the public trust. Thank you for your efforts and consideration. Best regards, Jeanette Colby on behalf of the Kenwood Isles Area Association Kenwood Isles Area Association Position Statement on Freight Relocation for SWLRT Adopted July 1, 2013 Nearly a mile of the proposed SWLRT runs through the Kenwood Isles Area Association neighborhood. We vehemently oppose the idea of maintaining freight rail along with light rail at grade in the Kenilworth Corridor, known as "co- location." Relocation of freight out of the Kenilworth Corridor has been promised for years. While the corridor was long used for transporting goods, freight use of Kenilworth was halted in 1993 when the Midtown Greenway was established. When freight was later re- introduced into the Kenilworth Corridor, Hennepin County assured residents this use of the corridor was temporary. Meanwhile, over 20 years of citizen efforts to build and maintain Cedar Lake Park and the Kenilworth Trail have resulted in a more beautiful and complete Grand Rounds and Chain of Lakes. Traffic on federally funded commuter and recreational bicycle trails in the Kenilworth Corridor grew to at least 620,000, perhaps approaching one million, visits in 2012. When the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority began looking at using the Kenilworth Corridor for LRT, several key studies and decisions reiterated the expectation that, if Kenilworth is to be used for transit, then the freight line must be relocated. (See notes below.) Trails were to be preserved. Freight rail was to be considered a separate project with a separate funding stream, according to Hennepin County. This position was stated publicly on many occasions, including Community Advisory Committee meetings and Policy Advisory Committee meetings. Minneapolis residents have positively contributed to the SWLRT process based on the information that freight and light rail would not co -exist in the Kenilworth Corridor. Although many of us think that Kenilworth is not the best route, most have participated in the spirit of cooperation and compromise to make the SWLRT the best it can be. Despite numerous engineering studies on rerouting the freight rail, it was not until December 2012 that the current freight operator in the Kenilworth Corridor, TC &W, decided to weigh in publicly on the location of its freight rail route. TC &W rejected the proposed reroute. The Met Council has responded by advancing new proposals for both rerouting the freight and keeping it in the Kenilwortli Corridor. For either option, these proposals range from the hugely impactful to the very expensive — or both. Six of the eight proposals call for "co- location" despite the temporary status of freight in Kenilworth. The Kenilworth proposals include the destruction of homes, trails, parkland, and green space. Most of the proposals would significantly add to the noise, safety issues, visual impacts, traffic backups, and other environmental impacts identified in the DEIS. This is not a NIMBY issue. The Kenilworth Trail provides safe, healthy recreational and commuter options for the city and region. It is functionally part of our park system. The Kenilworth Corridor is priceless green space that cannot be replaced. For over a decade public agencies have stated that freight rail must be relocated to make way for LRT through the Kenilworth Corridor. If this position is reversed midway through the design process for SWLRT, the residents of Kenwood Isles would find this a significant breach of the public trust. Simply stated, none of the co- location proposals are in keeping with the project goals of preserving the environment, protecting the quality of life, and creating a safe transit mode compatible with existing trails. This has been a deeply flawed process, and we reject any recommendation for at -grade co- location in the Kenilworth Corridor. If freight doesn't work in St. Louis Park, perhaps it's time to rethink the Locally Preferred Alternative. Notes 1) The 29'x' Street and Southwest Corridor Vintage Trolley Study (2000) noted that, "To implement transit service in the Southwest Corridor, either a rail swap with Canadian Pacific Rail or a southern interconnect must occur." 2) The FTA- compliant Alternatives Analysis (2005 -2007) defines the Kenilworth section of route 3A for the proposed Southwest Light Rail in this way: "Just north of West Lake Street the route enters an exclusive (LRT) guideway in the HCRRA's Kenilworth Corridor to Penn Avenue" (page 25). This study goes on to say that "to construct and operate an exclusive transit -only guideway in the HCRRA's Kenilworth Corridor the existing freight rail service must be relocated" (page 26). 3) The "Locally Preferred Alternative" (LPA) recommended by HCRRA (10/2912009) to participating municipalities and the Metropolitan Council included a recommendation that freight rail relocation be considered as a separate "parallel process." 4) In adopting HCRRA's recommended Locally Preferred Alternative based on treating relocation of the freight rail as a separate process, the City of Minneapolis' Resolution (January, 2010) stated: "Be It Further Resolved that the current environmental quality, natural conditions, wildlife, urban forest, and the walking and biking paths be preserved and protected during construction and operation of the proposed Southwest LRT line. Be It Further Resolved that any negative impacts to the parks and park -like surrounding areas resulting from the Southwest LRT line are minimized and that access to Cedar Lake Park, Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Kenilworth Trail and the Midtown Greenway is retained." 5) The Draft Environmental Impact Statement supports the Locally Preferred Alternative, which includes relocation of freight out of the Kenilworth Corridor. (December, 2012) 6) The southwesttransitvay.org has stated since its inception that: Hennepin County and its partners are committed to ensuring that a connected system of trails is retained throughout the southwest metro area. Currently, there are four trails that may be affected by a Southwest LRT line. They are the Southwest LRT trail, the Kenilworth trail, the Cedar Lake Park trail, and the Midtown Greenway. These trails are all located on property owned by the HCRRA. The existing walking and biking trails will be maintained; there is plenty of space for light rail and the existing trails. Currently, rails and trails safely coexist in more than 60 areas of the United States. Kenwood Isles Area Association Position Statement on Freiiht Relocation for SWLRT Adopted July 1, 2013 Nearly a mile of the proposed SWLRT runs through the Kenwood Isles Area Association neighborhood. We vehemently oppose the idea of maintaining freight rail along with light rail at grade in the Kenilworth Corridor, known as "co- location." Relocation of freight out of the Kenilworth Corridor has been promised for years. While the corridor was long used for transporting goods, freight use of Kenilworth was halted in 1993 when the Midtown Greenway was established. When freight was later re- introduced into the Kenilworth Corridor, Hennepin County assured residents this use of the corridor was temporary. Meanwhile, over 20 years of citizen efforts to build and maintain Cedar Lake Park and the Kenilworth Trail have resulted in a more beautiful and complete Grand Rounds and Chain of Lakes. Traffic on federally funded commuter and recreational bicycle trails in the Kenilworth Corridor grew to at least 620,000, perhaps approaching one million, visits in 2012. When the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority began looking at using the Kenilworth Corridor for LRT, several key studies and decisions reiterated the expectation that, if Kenilworth is to be used for transit, then the freight line must be relocated. (See notes below.) Trails were to be preserved. Freight rail was to be considered a separate project with a separate funding stream, according to Hennepin County. This position was stated publicly on many occasions, including Community Advisory Committee meetings and Policy Advisory Committee meetings. Minneapolis residents have positively contributed to the SWLRT process based on the information that freight and light rail would not co -exist in the Kenilworth Corridor. Although many of us think that Kenilworth is not the best route, most have participated in the spirit of cooperation and compromise to make the SWLRT the best it can be. Despite numerous engineering studies on rerouting the freight rail, it was not until December 2012 that the current freight operator in the Kenilworth Corridor, TC &W, decided to weigh in publicly on the location of its freight rail route. TC &W rejected the proposed reroute. The Met Council has responded by advancing new proposals for both rerouting the freight and keeping it in the Kenilworth Corridor. For either option, these proposals range from the hugely impactful to the very expensive — or both. Six of the eight proposals call for "co- location" despite the temporary status of freight in Kenilworth. The Kenilworth proposals include the destruction of homes, trails, parkland, and green space. Most of the proposals would significantly add to the noise, safety issues, visual impacts, traffic backups, and other environmental impacts identified in the DEIS. This is not a NIMBY issue. The Kenilworth Trail provides safe, healthy recreational and commuter options for the city and region. It is functionally part of our park system. The Kenilworth Corridor is priceless green space that cannot be replaced. For over a decade public agencies have stated that freight rail must be relocated to make way for LRT through the Kenilworth Corridor. If this position is reversed midway through the design process for SWLRT, the residents of Kenwood Isles would find this a significant breach of the public trust. Simply stated, none of the co- location proposals are in keeping with the project goals of preserving the environment, protecting the quality of life, and creating a safe transit mode compatible with existing trails. This has been a deeply flawed process, and we reject any recommendation for at -grade co- location in the Kenilworth Corridor. If freight doesn't work in St. Louis Park, perhaps it's time to rethink the Locally Preferred Alternative. Notes 1) The 29'x' Street and Southwest Corridor Vintage Trolley Study (2000) noted that, "To implement transit service in the Southwest Corridor, either a rail swap with Canadian Pacific Rail or a southern interconnect must occur." 2) The FTA- compliant Alternatives Analysis (2005 -2007) defines the Kenilworth section of route 3A for the proposed Southwest Light Rail in this way: "Just north of West Lake Street the route enters an exclusive (LRT) guideway in the HCRRA's Kenilworth Corridor to Penn Avenue" (page 25). This study goes on to say that "to construct and operate an exclusive transit - only guideway in the HCRRA's Kenilworth Corridor the existing freight rail service must be relocated" (page 26). 3) The "Locally Preferred Alternative" (LPA) recommended by HCRRA (10/29/2009) to participating municipalities and the Metropolitan Council included a recommendation that freight rail relocation be considered as a separate "parallel process." 4) In adopting HCRRA's recommended Locally Preferred Alternative based on treating relocation of the freight rail as a separate process, the City of Minneapolis' Resolution (January, 2010) stated: "Be It Further Resolved that the current environmental quality, natural conditions, wildlife, urban forest, and the walking and biking paths be preserved and protected during construction and operation of the proposed Southwest LRT line. Be It Further Resolved that any negative impacts to the parks and park -like surrounding areas resulting from the Southwest LRT line are minimized and that access to Cedar Lake Park, Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Kenilworth Trail and the Midtown Greenway is retained." 5) The Draft Environmental Impact Statement supports the Locally Preferred Alternative, which includes relocation of freight out of the Kenilworth Corridor. (December, 2012) 6) The southwesttransihvay.org has stated since its inception that: Hennepin County and its partners are committed to ensuring that a connected system of trails is retained throughout the southwest metro area. Currently, there are four trails that may be affected by a Southwest LRT line. They are the Southwest LRT trail, the Kenilworth trail, the Cedar Lake Park trail, and the Midtown Greenway. These trails are all located on property owned by the HCRRA. The existing walking and biking trails will be maintained; there is plenty of space for light rail and the existing trails. Currently, rails and trails safely coexist in more than 60 areas of the United States. Deb Mangen From: ggday @aol.com Sent Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:47 PM To: Edina Mail Subject SWLRT Dear Mayor Hovland: I have become aware that as part of the agenda at the August 28th meeting of the Corridor Management Committee you want to discuss the possibility of a shallow tunnel or other at -grade locating in the Kenilworth Greenway. I am writing to ask that you support the City of Minneapolis in its efforts to NOT co- locate (including the shallow tunnel option or even a short shallow tunnel eliminating the Northern segment) freight rail and LRT on the Kenilworth Greenway. The Kenilworth Greenway is a regional asset used by Edina residents as well as many others to commute to work, attend events in Minneapolis and to enjoy as part of the Twin Cities' regional trail system. I respect the Edina Parks & Recreation Department's mission "to do our part in further developing, preserving, and maintaining the City of Edina's parks, recreation programs and resources as a premier and comprehensive parks and recreation department in the Twin Cities area ". Please respect Mayor Rybak and the Minneapolis City Council to determine what is best for Minneapolis, the Kenilworth Greenway and the nearly one million Kenilworth Greenway users. Georgianna Day Ludcke Deb Mangen From: Patty Schmitz < pschmitz2806@gmail.com > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 6:22 AM To: Edina Mail; Patty Schmitz Subject: Co- location in Minneapolis Dear Mayor Jim Hovland: A couple of weeks ago 1 saw an article in the Star Tribune that noted that you were in favor of co- location of freight and LRT as part of the SWLRT green line extension. I'm going on memory now but I think you commented that they should simply relocate the bike path so that the problem of having room for both LRT and freight would be resolved. I'm hoping that you have ridden the portion of the Kenilworth Greenway that is giving the planners the most difficulty as it is the narrowest part of that corridor. I'm not sure if you have also ridden the suggested "re- route'' of the bike path, which I think you are advocating as one simple and inexpensive option. If you have not, I would encourage you to do so, so that you can see how the current safe and direct biking path would become a much more confusing route, including street crossings at the heavily travelled Dean Parkway. i would lie happy to ride along with you if you would like. 1 used to live closer to Edina in SW Mpls. and drove frequently through your city. I know that Edina has worked very hard to create safe biking paths through your city, and I think that you have experienced how challenging it is to do so when there are no natural corridors to create those paths. i had occasion to drive on Wooddale Avenue a couple of times when the biking lanes were striped — it actually made me so frightened as a driver that I resolved to never drive on Wooddale for fear that I Would hit a car or a cyclist! As you u•e aware, the City of Minneapolis welcomed the LRT through the Kenilworth Greenway with the stipulation that there be no co- location of freight (which is there temporarily) and LRT. if your city had made such a stipulation. i am sure that you would be fighting to make sure that that stipulation held firm, and would look to other elected officials to suppotrt you in that. f ask that you respect our city in its efforts against co- location of any kind. Sincerely, Patty Schmitz 2806 Dean Parkway pschmitz2806@gmail.com Deb Mangen From: Dan Arom <arom.dan @gmail.com> Sent Monday, August 19, 2013 9:40 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Edina Dome Support Mayor Hovland, I would like to express my support towards the construction of a domed facility in Edina! Growing up in Edina and living here for the better part of 25 years, having three school aged children, and having parent who still lives here, one of the truly great components of living in Edina are the facilities and activities that form this community and the bonds between residents. Also watching my mother retire and still want to live in this community and seeing the potential benefits from an indoor facility in such close proximity will be of great benefit to her mental and physical well being. Facilities such as the proposed dome will serve so many individuals from multiple age groups, that I believe there is a wonderful opportunity to act on the proposal to build the facility. Thank you for considering the project. Sincerely, Dan Arom Deb Mangen From: courtney Kiernat <courtneyck @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:59 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mayor Hovland- LRT Done Right for all Twin City residents Attachments: PastedGraphic -5.pdf Dear Mayor Jim Hovland: As a member of LRT Done Right, a grassroots citizens group strongly against co- location of freight and LRT on the Kenilworth Greenway, I am writing to ask that you reconsider your push for co- location. As a Minneapolis resident who frequents Edina businesses daily, I hope that you will respect Mayor Rybak and the City of Minneapolis' position to save the Kenilworth Greenway. The Kenilworth Greenway is a regional asset used by Edina and Twin City residents to commute to work, attend regional events and enjoy the regional trail system. LRT is supposed to enhance quality of life for residents, your support of co- location goes against enhancement and encourages the destruction of limited urban green space. Please reconsider your position on SWLRT in the Kenilworth Greenway. Sincerely, Courtney Cushing Kiernat Courtney Cushing Kiernat cou rtneyck0i),comcast. net 612- 865 -5048 - - - - - - - - - - CC 40 FT, v Deb Mangen From: julie sabo <julieannsabo @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 1:29 PM To: Edina Mail;jhovland @krausehovland.com Subject: LRT - Do not colocate /no shallow tunnel Dear Mayor Jim Hovland: I am writing to ask that you support the City of Minneapolis in its efforts to not co- locate (including shallow tunnel) freight rail and LRT on the Kenilworth Greenway. The Kenilworth Greenway is a regional asset used by Edina residents to commute to work, attend Minneapolis events and everyday enjoyment of the Twin Cities' regional trail system. We purchased our home on the Kenilworth Trail to use the commuter bike path. My husband commutes to the Federal Reserve Bank every day, year round. When snow is thick on the unplowed streets of Minneapolis the commuter bike paths, plowed by morning, have allowed him to get to work on time. Our family also use the trails to access grocery shopping, restaurants, Twins games, school and friends in other neighborhoods. Kenilworth trail provides a safe biking option for our two young sons. The Kenilworth trail is an integral part of our lives and our quality of life will be greatly impacted by your decision. Putting LRT through the Kenilworth Greenway has always been of questionable public policy to our family, but we are well aware of the complex interests and pressures that are part of developing public infrastructure. At a policy level it was a decision that left us shaking our heads, but at a personal level I was excited to have the LRT. I thought the bike trail infrastructure would support the LRT in a much more environmentally clean transit system, they would compliment each other. That is NOT what is happening. We bought our home knowing that the freight would be relocated to make way for LRT. We have not opposed LRT, but we do adamantly oppose the colocation of freight and LRT. I respect the Edina Parks & Recreation Department's mission "to do our part in further developing, preserving, and maintaining the City of Edina's parks, recreation programs and resources as a premier and comprehensive parks and recreation department in the Twin Cities area." Please respect Mayor Rybak and the Minneapolis City Council to determine what is best for Minneapolis, the Kenilworth Greenway and the nearly one million Kenilworth Greenway users. Consider a new alignment that makes more sense for the city and our region. Sincerely, Julie Sabo Name: Julie Sabo Address: 2560 Upton Ave South, Minneapolis E -mail: julieannsabo6byahoo.com Deb Mangen From: Larson, Sandi <slarson @subrad.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 3:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: No co- location of freight and LRT in the Kenilworth Greenway August 19, 2013 Dear Mayor Hovland: I am writing to ask that you support the City of Minneapolis in its efforts to not co- locate freight rail and LRT (including shallow tunnel) on the Kenilworth Greenway. The Kenilworth Greenway is a regional trail used by nearly one million users for both commuting and recreation, including Edina commuters and families. As you proceed with your decision - making, please listen to and consider other options including a deep tunnel or more specifically, a re- examination of the alignment that that allows residents the opportunities of LRT but not the destruction of regional resources. This is a resource that if once lost will never be the same for generations to follow. I respect the Edina Parks & Recreation Department's mission to preserve and protect your parks and recreation opportunities and ask that you also stand behind Mayor Rybak and the Mpls City Council as they determine what is best for for Minneapolis. Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Sandra Larson 2800 Dean Parkway Mpls, MN slarsonO- subrad.com Privacy Notice: The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material, including "protected health information ". If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy and delete this message from any computer and contact us immediately by return e-mail. Deb Mangen From: Angie & Sandeep <angie_sandeep @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 3:47 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Kenilworth Trail Dear Mayor Jim Hovland: I am writing to ask that you support the City of Minneapolis in its efforts to not co- locate (including shallow tunnel) freight rail and LRT on the Kenilworth Greenway. The Kenilworth Greenway is a regional asset used by Edina residents to commute to work, attend Minneapolis events and everyday enjoyment of the Twin Cities' regional trail system. I respect the Edina Parks & Recreation Department's mission "to do our part in further developing, preserving, and maintaining the City of Edina's parks, recreation programs and resources as a premier and comprehensive parks and recreation department in the Twin Cities area." Please respect Mayor Rybak and the Minneapolis City Council to determine what is best for Minneapolis, the Kenilworth Greenway and the nearly one million Kenilworth Greenway users. As a pediatrician working for a federally qualified health center, I see that people of all income levels in Minneapolis have access to playgrounds and bike trails. The effort our city makes towards protecting its parks earns Minneapolis a well deserved reputation for being forward thinking. This has lead to better health for low income people. For this and many other reasons, I say we can not endanger the chain of lakes. Thanks! Sincerely Angela Erdrich, MD 2218 Oliver Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55405 Anaie Sandeev(awahoo.com 612 516 6866 cell 612 377 5632 home Deb Mangen From: World Wildlife Fund <ecomments @wwfus.org> on behalf of Janice Opfinger <jlopfinger @mindspring.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 6:42 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Enroll our Community in the 2013 Earth Hour City Challenge - Fromjlopfinger @mindspring.com Aug 19, 2013 Mayor James Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland, This message was sent from ilopfineer @mindsgrine.com Thank you for your efforts to improve our community. As a resident, I am writing to express my deep concern about the threat that the impacts of climate change pose to our community. That is why I urge you to enroll our community in World Wildlife Fund's Earth Hour City Challenge (http: / /woridwildIife .ore /citychaIlenee), which offers a platform to recognize and reward cities for the work they do. The City Challenge builds on the annual Earth Hour event where millions around the globe turn out their lights for one hour in a call for action to protect the planet. All cities that share their sustainability efforts through the Earth Hour City Challenge will be publicly recognized and have a chance to compete for one of three $30,000 grants and be crowned an Earth Hour Capital! Learn more and enroll our city at http:// worldwildlife.ore /citychallenee Participating in this initiative can help raise the profile of our existing sustainability efforts and encourage us to do even more to advance renewable energy and prepare for climate change. I sincerely hope you will visit the website and take advantage of this great opportunity. Sincerely, Mrs. Janice Opfinger 317 Adams Ave Hopkins, MN 55343 -8434 Deb Mangen From: Crabtreejr @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 201311:08 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: Minnehaha Woods Street Reconstruction - warranty work Attachments Minnehaha_ Woods _5408_Oaklawn_Avenue_holejpg Dear Mayor Hovlund am following up on our recent conversation regarding the Minnehaha Woods street reconstruction took place in 2011. We are now approaching the end of the warranty period. 1. Street at 5408 Oaklawn Avenue At my house, 5408 Oaklawn Avenue, there was settlement of the curb by about 1.5" on the west side of the street. At another point it had dropped. On the opposite side of the street there was settlement of one section of curb, and stress cracks in another. There is a dip in the roadway across the whole street. In addition there is what I believe to be a settlement crack some 18' long to the south of the settled curbs. I am disappointed that this has taken place. I attach a photograph taken from the front yard of 5409 Oaklawn, looking towards 5408 Oaklawn, of the hole which was dug by the City "s contractor when making the new sewer connections, and installing the new water service lines to the shut -off valves. It was a substantial hole. You will also see that the soil is clay. Since the project I have learned much about building roads on clay. My understanding is that civil engineers would far rather build roads on sand which has good drainage. I was told by one engineer that you could remove the clay and replace it with a different material, but then that can cause other drainage problems. The key point about clay is that it must be compacted very carefully in layers of no more than 18 ", and preferably 12" at a time. This is time consuming. This compaction did not take place, certainly towards the bottom of this hole. A susbtantial quantity of clay was put in and then heavy earth moving equipment rolled over it. The settlement crack occured in the area of the edge of the hole (left hand side of the photograph). All of this does beg the question as to what exactly is expected of the the City and its engineers, SEH. One of the two SEH site engineers is shown in the photograph (standing, looking to the left). We pay people to do a job...... Before I move on, and in the interests of full disclosure, I had my sewer replaced with 4" PVC line from the house to the center of the street. My contractor dug a short way into the street before slip - lining the 4" PVC pipe through the original 6" clay tile pipe. The curb dropped where he had not dug, etc etc. 2. Warranty Work Some warranty work in already underway. Yesterday, the settled curbs outside my. house were removed. I understand that they are about to be replaced. The contractor also saw cut the street prior to replacing some of the black top. Ideally the hole would be dug out, the clay properly compacted, the required road bed put in, and then resurfaced. What I suspect will happen is that a section of blacktop will merely be replaced. Does the contractor gain by this, ie by gambling that the rectification work costs less than doing the job correctly? I asked the contractor about a settlement crack further down the block. It is some 22' long, and is outside 5432 Oaklawn Avenue. They knew nothing about it. Last night, at the meeting to discuss the 54th Street reconstruction, I asked Wayne Houle, the City Engineer. whether this remedial work was being done under the supervision of the City or SEH. I was told that it was. I then said that there were settlement cracks, and settled curbs which had not been marked for remedial work. I was asked if I had a list. As of now I do not, but will compile one and send it to Wayne. I need to walk through the rest of the neighbourhood, and drive round at night to look for dips in the roadway first. This does beg the question as to who is doing what inspection? The residents were assessed significant engineering fees for this project. Finally, I am encouraged that remedial work is under way. I hope that most of the roadway settlement has already taken place. From here on, it becomes the City's problem, and the future repair costs fall back on the residents. I hope that we can learn from this for future projects. If you have questions, please ask. I have many more photographs, both of the hole, and the finished work, and am prepared to share all of them. Sincerely John Crabtree 5408 Oaklawn Avenue tel 952 - 928 -8434 cc. Wayne Houle, City Engineer SEAL 0 21,13 Dear Governor Dayton, August 15, 2013 I have lived in my present home in Edina for 21 years and have enjoyed it very much until now. Since Delta Airlines moved in, I have almost constant noise on a daily basis. The noise from one plane does not fade away before the roar of another begins. There is a marked increase since Delta's presence here. Plane noise after 11 PM and early in the morning (2 AM — 5 AM) makes it difficult to sleep. I am self - employed and work in an office in my home. I frequently need to put managers and clients on hold while planes pass over, because the roar is so loud that we cannot hear each other speak. So you may get an idea of the frequency, here is a random sampling from Aug. 14, 2013 for one half hour (asterisks* indicate planes going directly above my home): 11:32 AM 11:45 11:32 11:46* 11:34 11:48 11:36* 11:50 11:37 11:52 11:38 11:53 11:40* 11:53 11:41 11:54 11:42* 11:55* 11:44 11:58 11:45 12:00 Noon Twenty two planes in 30 minutes, no higher than the distance of 3 city blocks from my house I sincerely hope you marshal your resources to mitigate this situation. Sincerely Nancy A. Quinn 5713 York Ave. S. Edina, MN 55410 acres85848@mvpacks.net Cc. Mayor Hovland XF11,M Connect lofl kip: / /web.mail.comcaSLnet/zim m /Wprinaxssag:?id= 11608&tz= Amc... XFINITY Connect 55car1ton@comcastnet RECEIVE f Font Size = 6609 Blackfoot Pass Property Subdivision From : 55cariton @comcast.net Sat, Aug 17, 2013 12:07 PM Subject: 6609 Blackfoot Pass Property Subdivision Bcc : cteague @EdinaMN.gov, KAaker @EdinaMN.gov, jhoogenakker @edinamn.gov, mail @EdinaMn.gov, joshsprague @edinarealty.com, swensonannl @gmail.com, mbrindle @comcast.net, LSLEDDER @Aol.com Since I will be out of town at the time of the Aug. 28 Planning Committee meeting, I would like to express my feelings and concerns now. Four of us neighbors attended the Aug. 8 meeting held by Scott Busyn of Great Neighborhood Homes at the Blackfoot Pass property. I was already in possession of a copy of the Preliminary Plat that GNH had registered with City Hall. This explicitly states a proposal to divide the parcel into two lots: Lot 1 @1.32 acres and Lot 2 @.46 acre. Mr. Busyn promptly informed us that his surveyor made a mistake and the two lots would be 1.08 and .7 acres respectively and that the mean or average lot size for the neighborhood was .72 acres. We were surprised to hear him say that his surveyor often makes mistakes and I question how he arrived at his figures! It seems to me that the only fair way to arrive at a mean or average lot size would be to compare other homes in the Indian Hills neighborhood within a certain proximity to the Blackfoot Pass property; such as Blackfoot Pass, Cheyenne Tr. and Cheyenne Circle, Indian Hills Road, etc. To take homes outside of Indian Hills would be like comparing apples and oranges. Neighbors have been discussing conservation easements and I will be interested in knowing more about this. Since my property is directly adjacent to the proposed subdivision property, I will be the one most significantly impacted by any decisions made. I cannot imagine more than one home on that piece of land and still be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Indian Hills is a beautiful and unique area. This is a well established neighborhood with dense vegetation, mature trees that have taken decades to grow and in many cases separate one home from another. While having a country feel, it is in close proximity to schools, churches, and shops. We treasure the size of our lots and sub - dividing them is inconsistent with the character of the neighborhood, Your interest and attention to this entire matter are deeply appreciated. I may be reached by phone after Aug. 29. Thank you very much. Pat Kreuziger 6705 Cheyenne Trail Edina, MN 55439 952 944 -2828 d =-J 8/17/2013 12:14 PM Edina Art and Culture Commission Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Community Room June 29, 2013 9:00 A.M. I. Call to Order Chair Bouassida called the meeting to order at 9:06 a.m. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Hafed Bouassida, Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Colin Nelson, Kitty O'Dea, Paul Peterson, Thomas Raeuchle, and John Swon. Commissioners Absent: None. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center. Guests: James Hovland, Mayor; George Sutton, Sutton & Associates; Tom Borrup, Independent Consultant; Bill McCabe. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda The agenda was approved as presented. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda There was no consent agenda. V. Community Comment No comments were made. VI. Welcome & Introductions A. Welcome by Chair Hafed Bouassida Chair Bouassida welcomed the Mayor, Arts and Culture Commissioners, staff, and guests. He noted that this strategy session is a big step for Edina and for other cities who will seek to follow the model of the newly created Arts and Culture Commission. Chair Bouassida introduced Art Center General Manager Michael Frey. B. Introductions by Art Center General Manager Michael Frey General Manager Frey thanked everyone for attending and introduced the two consultants, Mr. Sutton and Mr. Borrup.. George Sutton, Sutton & Associates, thanked the Commission and stated that it is rare that money is the challenge when dealing with arts and culture committees; rather, the challenge is consensus. He expressed belief that this is a great opportunity to continue the work previously begun with the Edina Art Center Analysis and the Arts and Culture Working Group, particularly the ability to look beyond the Art Center to other opportunities in the community. Tom Borrup, Independent Consultant, stated he has worked for many years on strategic planning and broader community planning, helping communities think about arts and culture and how it can leverage other types of change. Each Commissioner introduced himself /herself. Mayor Hovland introduced himself, noting the Council is excited about the Arts and Culture Commission especially as the community is starting to move towards public appreciation of art. He noted the Commission can help assess the needs for the public spaces around Grandview Square and the Promenade. He suggested the Commission spend its time Zing aspirational rather than worrying about the structure of the Commission. The Commission will report directly to the Council, though the Park Board has some oversight related to the Art Center. C. Review of Day's Agenda Chair Bouassida introduced the agenda. He noted that the Commission struggled with the agenda and specifically whether to discuss organization, structure, and /or aspiration. He noted the two important pieces of work supporting today's meeting: a study conducted by Mr. Sutton and the work done by the Arts and Culture Working Group. VII. Morning Session A. Review of Structure — "What are we, anyway" Mr. Sutton stated the objective is to hear from everybody today. He reminded the Commission of where the work left off when the analysis was completed, noting his report reflected the will of the Art Center advisory board at the time. He recalled that the Arts and Culture Working Group had been offered the opportunity to look at Southdale, and the opportunity was appreciated, but it simply did not fit. A look was also taken at the current Art Center and whether to recommend that the City spend more money on the facility, but that was not pursued due to its location and the facility itself. He noted there are more emerging opportunities in which the Art Center might take a role. There seems to be a lot of opportunity to serve a cultural community in Edina. He added that the Council has committed to ongoing support and a full -time Arts Center general manager as well. Mr. Sutton continued that this Commission was formed to advise the Council on the aspirational aspects in the community; there is no management responsibility or oversight of the Art Center. The Council is looking to this Commission to gather community input and progressive ideas. Commissioner La Valleur commented about the goal of employing more full -time and fewer part-time employees at the Art Center. General Manager Frey noted that effort is ongoing. Mr. Sutton recalled the City was encouraged to professionalize staff, and that is underway. General Manager Frey stated the Arts and Culture Working Group decided upon the following mission statement: Our mission is to build a vibrant community, foster common bonds, nurture talent and create venues for expressing and appreciating the arts and culture in Edina. Chair Bouassida asked the Commissioners to answer the question of "What are we, anyway." Commissioner La Valleur began the discussion by stating this is a group of passionate Edina residents committed to having art be more than just a conversation in the City. Producing results is critical. She expressed a personal interest in a new Art Center that reflects the greatness of this City, one that is inclusive of performing arts, painting, singing, poetry, and that is a venue where residents can perform and visitors can come to see great art. Commissioner Swon questioned what the Commission's relationship to a performing arts center would be, since the Commission would not manage it. Mr. Swon commented on EPAC — the Edina Performing Arts Center at Edina High School. Commissioner Meifert stated he is very action - oriented, having a business background, and suggested the Commission should be pursuing initiatives in the form of film, fine arts, music, literature, and stage in the community. As a group, a two -year plan should be focused on to achieve that. He suggested focusing on fewer things rather than many things. Commissioner Lappin agreed with the previously expressed comments. Mr. McCabe noted there is a lot of interest beyond this group to have something to say about what is going to happen. He recalled that with the Arts and Culture Working Group, from time to time there were large numbers of people engaged, and then they would fall off. It clearly indicated an interest in the community, in both the process and the end result. Coming out of that study was an indication of interest in a variety of art forms, but also in a facility and relating the arts to the economic life in the community. As the Commission goes forward, the message should be coherent, whatever that message is. Commissioner Nelson stated he sees the Commission offering a greater variety of genres of art, though not everything can be offered, so perhaps a couple types of art should be the focus. He agreed with the concept of involving non - artists as well. He stated it is hard to find the artists in Edina and to get them to come forward. He suggested finding a way to encourage the local artists in Edina to contribute to the work of the Commission. General Manager Frey stated Edina is a unique City, and an arts and culture presence also needs a unique quality to it. Right now people do not know the where the Art Center is. He stated there are people out there wanting to get involved, and efforts need to be focused on methods of involvement. Commissioner O'Dea echoed the idea of broadening the City's idea of the arts. She stated that the Commission's mission should be to create the vision of what integrating the arts in Edina looks like. The Commission's job should be to bring it to life and prioritize. There are opportunities out there, and the question is how to get people to participate and to have a structure in place to help them do that. Commissioner Raeuchle expressed agreement with most of what has been said. The new mission statement was riginally conceived as the mission for the Art Center, but very little would be required to make it the mission of the Arts and Culture Commission. The Commission is in a position to shape the City vis -a -vis the arts. He suggested the Commission is more of a facilitator than a 'doer' of arts. If someone has an arts - related issue in Edina, the Commission can facilitate the issue with the City. The last thing the Commission should be is a bottleneck. Chair Bouassida agreed with Commissioner Raeuchle's comments. He stated that as facilitators, the goal is to help other people implement what they have in mind. The Commission should be the group to help others reach their goals. It is essential to note that one or two Commissioners can be involved with an issue with the City, but the City should drive the process. He commented that it is disconcerting to have a situation in which there are five Commissioners and one person from the City involved on one working group. Mr. Sutton suggested instead of saying, "they come to us," there should be a way for the Commission to go to the public. Chair Bouassida agreed. Commissioner Peterson began by saying he is new to the Commission and suggested there is an incredible opportunity to elevate the arts in Edina. He believes the Commission brings something unique to the table, and it should be very clear and unified about what to bring to the Council. He asked that all Commissioners be very open- minded about how to best facilitate bringing forth many genres of art to the citizens of Edina. Once the vision is clear, the Commission can bring the ideas to light in a different way. He suggested there has to be a better way to get the word out. One area that requires unity is financing. He agreed bottlenecking is a bad thing and should be avoided. Commissioner Ellis expressed support for the comments made thus far. She would like Edina to have a draw from inside and outside the community in order to continue to bring energy to the community. Five or ten years down the road, she would like Edina to be recognized for arts and cultural opportunities on a greater scale than it does now. Mayor Hovland stated Edina resident Curtis Johnson coauthored a book, Disrupting Class, which mentioned how Minnesotans are really great at admiring problems. In his view, aspirations that move to action are what we want to achieve. The Council has to be convinced those aspirations are need - based. It will be an interesting pathway as the Iommission figures out what is factually need - based. He encouraged the Commission to discover what is out there in arms of latent need, performing arts being one example. Mr. Sutton summarized some of the adjectives expressed so far: the Commission wantsto be visionary, committed, results- oriented, inclusive, ambitious, action - oriented, suggestive, focused, connective, expansive, measureable, inclusionary, engaged, coherent, communicative, practical, effective, advocates, helpful, representative, lifting, unified, fluid, attractive, needs based, realistic, with the ability to get things done. B. Aspirations for Cultural Entrepreneurship in Edina Mr. Sutton asked the Commission to discuss other aspirational programmatic ideas. Commissioner Ellis suggested increased opportunity and participation with the school district along with use of the performing arts center; other ideas are community theater, children's theater, and jazz quartets. Commissioner Meifert stated he drives past the Edina Performing Arts Center regularly, and it is vacant most of the time. It is a great venue, but it is reserved for high school activities. Mr. Sutton stated in higher education and school systems, there are facilities that are necessary, but there are no good mechanisms for shared uses. Commissioner Ellis stated if there is a connection in the community stronger than what there is now, there would be greater goodwill about what the students are doing and other facilities that might be built. Commissioner Swon stated the Edina Performing Arts Center is not terribly welcoming when it comes to the schedule. Commissioner Peterson stated he is in the process of making inroads in that community through higher education, which is currently missing. Mr. Sutton stated there are assets underutilized in the community, but he encouraged the Commission to return to the ea of programming itself. Commissioner Peterson stated he would like a music festival, possibly a jazz festival, which would attract people for a day or a weekend with vendors and sponsorships. He also suggested enhanced smaller things like music in the parks and a greater utilization of the Show - Mobile, which is brought out only two or three times. He noted that Centennial Lakes has a well - planned out amphitheater. Edinborough is another place to elevate music in the parks. The Show - Mobile can be brought to different parks and bring in some more current music. He also encouraged cooperation between the arts and higher education, noting that an evaluation can be done regarding turning the Edina Performing Arts Center into a venue for the arts. Commissioner Ellis stated there are simple things that can be added to the Edina library, such as alphabets and letters ors the staircases, similar to what is currently at the Ridgedale library. Commissioner O'Dea recalled that during her international travels last year, she noticed art everywhere, such as stone decorations in the sidewalks and tile in the sidewalks. She would like to integrate art in the City, so there is a surprise everywhere. She asked how art can be incorporated into projects that the Planning Commission and Council are in the process of approving. Commissioner Raeuchle suggested forms of art that are not permanent — a mime on the corner, for example. He would like to encourage the smaller, everyday art that is transient rather than exclusively art that takes up space. He also noted that in order to do something not related to movies or dinner, residents have to go out of town. Chair Bouassida stated there are two ways to look at this programmatically. Mimes and music in the park are great ideas. The other side is doing things and responding to needs. The Arts and Culture Working Group brought forward very concrete issues that need to be dealt with related to communication, permits, and regulations regarding doing art in a private home. The entire study should not be neglected with all emphasis placed on trying to implement dreams. He pointed out a document of the Arts and Culture Working Group, which highlighted the top five challenges faced in the Edina arts community. General Manager Frey clarified that the document referenced was created by Claire Lukens and Brendon Johnson and is a 31 -page document with a summary page. Commissioner Nelson stated he has started the Author's Studio, where he interviews authors from Edina and elsewhere. Writing classes have also begun at the Art Center in partnership with The Loft Around Town. He also suggested looking into a book festival. Bloomington started one less than ten years ago, and it has a good turnout. Writing contests are another idea. Another option is to publish a book of short stories, fiction, and poetry written by Edina authors. He noted the Author's Studio runs eight times during the month by Comcast and is now also uploaded onto YouTube. Mr. McCabe suggested coordination among various administrations between the school district, the City, and the business community in terms of changing expectations and attitudes about arts. Several years ago, the issue with working with the school district was on the agenda; there has to be a way to overcome the inability to share facilities. Regarding business community involvement, he recalled when "Jazz at the G" was hosted by Gabbert's in the Galleria, and it drew a huge crowd. He also suggested making use of a variety of media. Commissioner Lappin encouraged the Commission to work with the school district and also to improve advertisement of music in the parks. Commissioner Meifert would like to see space for artists to display their work on an ongoing basis. He would also like to see a screenplay contest, which would be a great tie -in with the film festival, with a maximum screenplay of 10 pages long. The films would be filmed, produced, and shown at the film festival and would require inclusion of one crowd scene of residents of Edina. He also suggested community theater, which could involve the Edina Performing Arts Center. He also suggested increasing the presence of dance studios. He noted there are currently two competitive dance studios but no place to dance locally once high school is over. Commissioner Peterson stated there should be space for young dancers to have recitals in Edina rather than having to go to other cities. Commissioner Swon stated that for the long -term, there needs to be additional venues, though the school is a good short-term solution. Bringing in people from outside would require a larger facility in close proximity to other business and commerce. He stated there are so many groups asking for so much money all the time, and the model might be exhausted. One of the challenges is the arts community is not communicating with the wealthy community. A capital campaign would be a different approach. Chair Raeuchle added that currently, there is not much to offer in return either. Commissioner Swon agreed that gallery and exhibit space is needed. Commissioner Raeuchle stated many venues require programming, and there needs to be a reason to stay for a while, like a cafe or a restaurant. The high school auditorium requires someone to drive elsewhere for dinner ahead of time, which is an impediment. Commissioner La Valleur suggested making a vehicle available for touring the sculptures. Tours begin in July, and it is currently a walking tour of the Promenade only, not Grandview Square or 50`h & France. She saw an Edinborough Park vehicle that holds 10 to 15 passengers. She added that art- wrapped utility boxes are in the works, and those can be a community project. City Manager Scott Neal gave approval to proceed with two art- wrapped utility boxes. Commissioner La Valleur stated additional signage is needed for the Promenade and other venues. Other ideas include attractive benches in parks and at bus stops, European -style chess under a bridge of Centennial Lakes and ceramic tiles on Centennial Lakes with art included. She also noted that the City is not using the pinecone; she pointed out the Edina Public Arts Committee uses it on its logo. The pinecone is in Centennial Lakes, but it is not used as a marketing tool like it should be. Commissioner La Valleur commented that social media is underutilized currently. She has encouraged people to take a picture of themselves with their favorite sculpture and post it. Mayor Hovland encouraged expansion of music in the parks. He stated there could be a certain type of music every Thursday night at a park. He expressed support for more music at 50`h & France, which is an admired area in terms of business and should be maximized. He also expressed support for the idea of street art. A book festival is another good idea. He noted that the City -run photography contest draws the same participants year after year and could be expanded. Mayor Hovland noted that Bridgeport, Connecticut, has a lot of abandoned industrial buildings, and the City has worked with Cisco Systems to create images under the bridges and on the sides of buildings to mask the decay of the blight. Perhaps there are locations in Edina where something can be projected, like the parking ramp on the Macy's Home Store side. Mayor Hovland also brought up food as art. He also mentioned Art Basel in Miami Beach, a festival that draws tens of thousands each year. Benefactors could be found for a future performing arts center. He noted that Bloomington has a benefactor who created an endowment specifically to backstop any operating losses. Commissioner La Valleur stated she would like to see further inroads with the high school, but that does not take away from the long -term need for a performing arts center with businesses around it. Mayor Hovland stated a farmer's market could move in to 50`h &France. ,ommissioner Raeuchle suggested turning the surface parking lot into a park, particularly for eating take -out at 501h& rance. He mentioned a currently existing urban space for people to eat outdoors at 26` and Nicollet in Minneapolis. Chair Bouassida brought up a suggestion from the Arts and Cultural Working Group, which was placing a photograph of a famous painting and placing it in the park with directions included of where to see the painting in person — whether that be at Walker, the Minneapolis Institute of Arts, et cetera. Commissioner Raeuchle stated the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra has community concerts in various venues around the city. There is an opportunity for quality classical concert music. Mr. Frey noted that Sandra Shaughnessy has invited a potter Robbie Lobell to the Art Center who deals exclusively with pottery for oven to table and a chef for the event is being discussed. The meeting recessed for a 15 minute break at 10:56 a.m. Mr. Sutton stated an arts center should be responsive to the need. He also summarized that the Commissioners expressed support for art all over the place, not just an aggregate place. It should also be a place, if it is built, to have some interaction with the City. Building a facility is one thing; animating it on an ongoing basis is another thing. There are few organizations with professional staff to administrate programs and there are fewer people employed as artists in this community. Mr. Sutton suggested the Commission move on to discuss entrepreneurship in the arts. He pointed out that Commissioner Swon has created a film festival, Commissioner La Valleur has really grown the Edina Public Art Committee, and Commissioner Nelson launched The Author's Studio. He asked the Commissioners to discuss entrepreneurship and what kinds of resources would the Commission and users need. Commissioner La Valleur stated most artists she knows are working from their home. She suggested looking at a way to use art to generate income and what prohibits that. Most people are not able to have a rented studio from which to sell -rt. Mobile venues are needed. She would like to know more about the visual artists in the community. Commissioner Raeuchle stated there are ways of encouraging entrepreneurship by, for example, having a screenplay contest. Something can be done to stimulate artistic entrepreneurship within the community through a variety of means. Mr. Sutton stated there is the Northrup King Warehouse in NE Minneapolis that sat empty for a long time, and finally it was rented to artists. Commissioner Nelson added that happened because the City approached the developer and asked him to do something with the eyesore in the city. Commissioner Ellis noted that is a destination now, and there has been marketing to support it. Commissioner Peterson stated there should be an infrastructure to help bring people out of the woodwork, specifically, a unified fundraising mechanism. He asked the Commission to consider how to unify fundraising so that something can be offered in return. He noted that another aspect is educating the public about who the Commission is and what it is trying to do. There are things that need to be done in an infrastructure type of way. Mayor Hovland stated if something needs to be produced, the Comcast studio in Bloomington can be utilized. Commissioner Ellis brought up the need for an Arts and Culture Commission website where arts and cultural events are housed in one location. Commissioner Meifert stated entrepreneurship needs to be focused on communication. Commissioner Swon suggested going out into the community to assess needs and dreams. General Manager Frey stated that was attempted through Survey Monkey and phone interviews with residents throught the Arts & Culture Working Group intern. The Peggy Kelly Music Studio was set up originally to be a production studio, with recording and production capability, but it lacked the entrepreneurship to carry it forward. Commissioner Raeuchle stated the question is how to take the next step. Mr. Sutton stated Mr. Borrup's presentation will look at how municipalities have leveraged community aspirations. He pointed out the Commission is very much dependent on the City, which is supportive. He asked the Commission to discuss what needs to be attracted or supported or just brought out in the community. Commissioner O'Dea stated there are many entrepreneurs in the school area, so they are out there. Perhaps the first thing to do is tap into the people at the original Arts and Culture Working Group. Mr. Sutton stated the only way the Art Center could communicate was through the City communications department, and that is an example of how not to do it. Chair Bouassida stated the point of the Commission is to foster entrepreneurship. The first goal of the Commission is to remove the roadblocks to entrepreneurship. At the end of the day, if the Commission is able to remove roadblocks that prevent people from doing the arts, then those people will be entrepreneurs. Mr. Sutton asked whether a roadblock to performing arts is a dedicated facility. The Commissioners concurred. Chair Bouassida noted additional roadblocks, such as lack of studio and performance space, rules and regulations and how to change them to make the City welcoming, and the previously discussed communication bottlenecks. Commissioner Ellis discussed an art of the lakes tour near her cabin, where artists are working out of their homes, generating income out of their home, and offering classes in their home. Her impression is that is not possible with parking ordinances and that type of thing in Edina. The Commission agreed on the limitations of using the City's website for the Arts and Culture Commission. General Manager Frey noted the City's website for the Art Center could be expanded and increased. It becomes cumbersome because it follows City protocol. Commissioner La Valleur suggested communicating /advertising via Facebook. Several Commissioners stated that is not the best venue. Commissioner Swon noted that the Commission currently operates without a budget. He suggested one option of going through the Edina Community Foundation if funds are needed for a website. Mr. Sutton suggested that creating a "Friends of" program is a possibility. He also noted the Arts and Culture Commission is an advisory body to the City Council and does not have its own funding mechanism. Mayor Hovland posed the question of what the role of government is related to arts and community. Over time, this is a question that should be carefully explored. He cannot see the City creating a building that has space available for artists to rent and to work and sell their works. He cited an example of a home for artists on Lincoln Road in South Beach. These artists are in a key retail location and have a building where they work and sell their wares. It feels like a private gallery, not a government gallery. He commented that what should be discussed is what City should be doing to set the table for success, and then at what point should the City be getting out of the way. Further discussion ensued on the best way to create a separate website for the Commission. .Aayor Hovland stated the Commission needs to be thinking about public /private partnerships. Commissioner La Valleur stated Edina has expensive properties, not blighted grounds like other cities where redevelopment is an option. Commissioner Raeuchle suggested a discussion on what needs can be satisfied without a budget. Other commissions also do not have a budget and still do successful, helpful work. Perhaps the Commission should consider what kinds of things can be done without a budget. The next step is private /public partnerships; then the next step is determining whether the City is willing to chip in money for a building. Chair Bouassida stated at some point there is a need of money. He is happy to see that the idea of public /private partnership is in the works. Mr. Sutton stated people start businesses every day. He does not believe there is much in the way; there is so much market opportunity. The overreliance on government creates an impediment because there has not been the need to draw in private capital. In St. Paul, the City has the STAR grants program. The City reserves a percentage of sales tax for grants to be made to St. Paul organizations, and it is administered by the City. Commissioner Raeuchle noted there is a park dedication fee, so perhaps there could be an arts dedication fee. He noted the Legacy Act is a new source of funding, but very little of that funding is going to Edina. Commissioner Swon brought up the Service Corp of Retired Executives (SCORE) program through the Small Business Administration. Mr. Sutton stated Mr. Borrup's presentation will help broaden the tools and vocabulary to what is available. Chair Bouassida stated the Legacy Fund is very powerful and that nothing prevents the City from approaching the Legacy amendment and going for those grants or creating 501(c)3's. C. Noon — Break The meeting recessed for a five minute break at 12:03 p.m. Vill. Working Lunch Mr. Borrup presented the Creative Community Builder's Handbook and discussed nurturing creative assets. Cultural leaders are really community leaders; the goal is to maintain an inclusive cultural tent. He noted Edina is not an island; not everything has to be created here. What is unique and special that we can do in Edina. He suggested people think bigger, and the Mayor is helping with that. Know your assets and leverage them; keep a constant inventory. Mr. Borrup stated people come to the arts community wearing many hats. Arts tend to make people horizontal; they connect people across the spectrum. Mr. Borrup stated his book covers approaches to sustainable economic, social and physical development through the arts. It grew out of a frustration of people in the arts not working with those around them to get things done. He noted the arts create jobs. Arts help cities enhance and project place identity. The arts also build social capital, stimulate trade and tourism, attract investment, diversity the economy, enhance value in communities, retain wealthy locally. Mr. Borrup continued that a big change is taking place; he mentioned the work of Richard Florida, author of the book "Rise of the Creative Class ", who has documented big shifts in how we spend our time and money and believes we are in the midst of a big shift right now. After 60 years of expensive infrastructure, there are now emphases on planning around transit, walkable centers, and more transit options with new focal points with walkable spaces. Mr. Borrup quoted the work of Ash Amin from 2006 who discussed four R's of creating "The Good City": repair, relatedness, rights, and re- enchantment. 1r. Borrup cited a study by the Knight Foundation /Gallup that discovered what makes people emotionally attached to a ,,lace. They were quite surprised to consistently find over the three -year study: social offerings, openness, and beauty. Mr. Borrup cited the work of John Hawkes, who looks at sustainable places through four pillars: economic well- being, environmental well- being, social well- being, and cultural well- being. He discussed the core competencies to be applied to making Edina a good city, including fostering creativity, cultural celebration and exchange, a role in planning and development, contributing to the quality of life. Mr. Borrup discussed cited a recent study by the National Governors Association and the new engines of growth and the role of arts and culture. Arts and culture provide a fast - growth dynamic industry cluster, help mature industries becom more competitive, provide critical ingredients for innovative places, catalyze community revitalization, and delivering a better - prepared workforce. He noted some trends among local arts councils, including prioritizing individual artists, creating initiatives in arts education in school, collecting and dissemination data, having an engaged Board as a key to success, and partnerships and collaborations as a key tool. He highlighted the governmental arts agencies in Providence and Shreveport, where they worked on creating art space, then place, then community. Mr. Borrup discussed several artist /organizational core competencies, including creating and managing spaces open to new ideas, getting people involved, promoting ideas and projects, applying creativity to implementation, and making community work fun. Mr. Borrup summarized with some final thoughts /basic principles: cultural leaders are community leaders, maintain inclusive cultural tent, look around to not replicate other cities, think bigger, and know your assets and leverage them. He noted next steps including: taking stock of assets; thinking about who are the most immediate partners; thinking about community's needs, desire, and interests; devise a strategic plan; formalizing an implementation plan; and start with what you can do. He ended with the admonition to: ask not what the community can do for the arts, ask what the arts can do for your community. The Commission thanked Mr. Borrup for.his presentation. Mayor Hovland stated the Commission has a good sense that it needs to create community, not just space and place Mayor Hovland recalled the story he recently heard at the Mayors Conference, by Tony Sheia who is reinventing Las Vegas with respect to housing and with respect to community. He wants to create opportunities for collision, where people collide with each other. Mr. Borrup referred to it as 'bump rate'. Mr. Sutton thanked Chair Bouassida and everyone else on the Commission who has spent so much time on looking beyond the Art Center in Edina. The mechanics are not in place right now to write checks to do things. But there is the ability to focus on where investments could be made to leverage some of these efforts. IX. Afternoon Sessions A. What are the resources needed to foster success —finances, supportive infrastructure, and mind share? Mr. Sutton stated he wants to discuss what cities have done to leverage public /private partnerships Mr. Borrup began with a case study of Governor's Island in New York, where the City of New York has taken over the island and invited in artists. Free ferry rides are provided to bring people to the island to view the art. It has been a phenomenal success, and people flock there to watch all of the different art being created. The City has done all the funding so far, and now they are looking at philanthropic dollars and food vendors are also there. Commissioner Raeuchle stated the Friends of the Arts in St. Paul have been funding an artist in residence, Marcus Young. He is actually embedded in the public works department in St. Paul; a grant was received to get it started. Mr. Borrup discussed working with Yellow Springs, Ohio, where a lot of creative energy exists, but with no synchronization between them. His job was to build a relationship between the business and creative community, and it has made a huge difference. The relationships in the community are much more positive. Commissioner Raeuchle stated coordination should be happening with the Chamber of Commerce. The relationship between the Chamber and the Art Center was not always very positive, so there is an opportunity for collaboration as well. Mayor Hovland stated the Edina Chamber is looking for all kinds of new opportunities, and one is to collaborate on improving quality of place. He added that he had a recent meeting with the Bush Foundation, which is about to embark on a new project to build community, and grants may be available. Mayor Hovland noted that a special dispensation from the legislature is needed to create a sales tax increase. He noted that one idea is to attach a fee for every development that is dedicated to arts and culture in Edina; it could be a percentage of the value of the building permit or the project. Commissioner Raeuchle exhorted the Commission not to forget about some of the community issues that knit people together, noting there is more to it than a piece of art; the question is how to support people bumping into each other. ''hair Bouassida stated one of the Commission's roles might be to advise the Council on such issues. Mr. Sutton asked whether a quarterly report by the Commission to the City Council is feasible. Mayor Hovland responded that something can be worked out. Currently the Commission meets with Council twice a year at Joint Work Sessions. Chair Bouassida noted the City has already invited the Arts and Culture Commission to present their 2014 Work Plan and that is underway. The City is expecting the Arts and Culture Commission to present a clear plan on what it would like to work on. He suggested setting concrete goals that are achievable between now and next year. The Commission discussed creating working groups as well as setting goals for the next calendar year. Chair Bouassida stated the Commission needs the following documents to proceed: a copy of the minutes from today's meeting; the document generated by the Arts and Culture Working Group; and, a copy of Mr. Borrup's presentation. He suggested that by the next meeting, every Commissioner should be able to suggest working groups as well as five goals for the next year. The Commission proceeded to discuss the goals for 2014, including: • communication strategy; • artistic calendar (events, resources, opportunities for artists); • media /advertising /social media; film, music, juried show; • establish working groups; • secure a role in the Grandview District Citizen Advisory Committee (as a top priority); • identify core strengths and develop five -year strategies; • examine enabling /ordinances and rules; • explore funding options; • explore culinary arts /projects /opportunities; • continue assessing space needs; establish working relationship with business community; • re- engage artists in Edina; and • identify partners. Chair Bouassida stated he would like every Commissioner to come prepared with his or her top five goals and ideas for working groups by the next meeting. The Commissioners discussed the bylaws and whether to revise the old set. Mayor Hovland asked the Commission to revise the boilerplate bylaws as necessary, and the Council will approve the modified bylaws. Chair Bouassida asked for volunteers for a small committee to work modifying the bylaws by the next meeting. Commissioners Ellis, Meifert, and Raeuchle volunteered General Manager Frey noted that the 4th of July parade is coming soon, and any Commissioners who would like to represent the Commission in the parade can ride together in a vehicle. X. Thank You and Adjournment Chair Bouassida thanked Mr. Sutton, Mr. Borrup, and the Commissioners for their time. Chair Bouassida thanked Mayor Hovland for attending the entire meeting. The meeting adjourned at 1:51 p.m. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 10, 2013 7:00 P`M I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Scherer, Schroeder, Potts, Platteter, Forrest, Grabiel, Carpenter, Carr, Cherkassky, Kilberg Staunton III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Carpenter moved approval of the meeting agenda. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Scherer moved approval of the June 12 & 24, 2013 meeting minutes. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning to Amend the PUD -3 Zoning District, Preliminary Development Plan. Mount Properties /Aurora Investments, 6500 France Avenue, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a change to the proposal to redevelop the property at 6500 France Avenue. The previously approved plan for Page 1 of 12 the site was a five- story, 62 -foot tall, 102,478 square foot medical office /retail building with an attached 4 -5 level parking ramp. Teague explained that Mount Development and Aurora Investments, LLC are requesting consideration of a change in use to 111 units of senior assisted living; 68 units of traditional care /skilled nursing and memory care beds and 18 care suites. The "care" suites would-include short term stays by patients that have had surgery at Fairview Hospital or Twin City Orthopedic (TCO). The building would be similar in style from the previously approved building and still be five stories in height. A pedestrian skyway would connect the building to the hospital parking ramp to the north. The previously approved parking ramp would be removed and replaced with housing. The parking would be provided underground. There would be a 15,000 square foot reduction in the structure footprint from the previous plan. To accommodate the request, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and an amendment PUD Zoning District would be required. Teague further explained that this development proposal is subject to a two -step review process. The first step in the process is to obtain the following approvals: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow senior housing as a permitted use in the Regional Medical District, Preliminary Rezoning to amend the PUD, Planned Unit Development -3 Zoning District; and Preliminary tYevefopment Plan. Teague stated the second step requires: Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District and Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. Teague asked the Commission to note that the applicant is also proposing to provide four (4) units of affordable housing through the Elderly Waiver program. The Planning Commission and City Council may wish to consider requiring additional affordable housing units, perhaps 10% of all the senior housing units, which would be a total of eighteen (18). units. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow senior housing in the RMD District; and to potentially allow greater density for senior housing development under certain circumstances on a case by case basis based on the following findings: 1. Senior Housing is a compatible use with the Regional Medical District. It would provide seniors a benefit of having medical facilities within close proximity. 2. Densities for Senior Housing within the RMD & HDR Districts would be determined on a case by case basis, allowing the City some discretion as to when high density for senior housing may be appropriate. Densities for senior housing would be based on proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. In general, senior housing generates less traffic than all -age housing or medical office facilities. Page 2 of 12 Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District, and approve the Preliminary Development Plan. Approval is also based on the following findings: I. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, assuming the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street, provides underground parking, and provides an indoor pedestrian connection to the hospital. 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, architectural precast concrete, and glass, and is compatible with previously approved medical building. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. 5. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. Traffic generated by the proposed project would be less than the approved medical building for the site. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design.. Where appropriate, building facades should forma consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of linear buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. ■ Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Page 3 of 12 ■ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian - scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 7. Higher densities are justified for the following reasons: The project would be connected to the Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway, tying the project to the Hospital; Senior Housing would generate less traffic than the approved medical building with retail on the site; existing roadways would support the project; adequate utilities are available to the site; convenient transit service is available for workers and residents; the building would include sustainable design principles; public art is proposed; affordable housing is offered; and primary parking would be below grade. Preliminary approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 6, 2013; including construction of the skyway connection tolhe Fairview Hospital parking ramp. 2. A noise study must be done to demonstrate that the proposed mechanical equipment meets all noise regulations. 3. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the Planning Commission staff report. 4. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated July 2, 2013. 6. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 7. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. Appearing for the Applicant Stephen Michals, Mount Development Co., Ed Farr, Edward Farr, Edward Farr Architects, Susan Farr, Ebenezer and Luigi Bernardi, owner. Discussion Commissioner Carr said in reviewing the submitted materials it appeared to her that the description of Senior Housing includes independent living, assisted living, memory care, and Page 4 of 12 skilled nursing -Carr asked if any of the tenants of this facility would be under 55 -years in age; and if so would that become an issue. Continuing, Carr said she assumes that this facility would allow those under 55 in need that need assisted living, adding clarification may be needed on the definition. Commissioner Carpenter also noted in the Regional Medical District (RMD) senior housing isn't permitted. Planner Teague'agreed, adding when this site was designated as RMD there was no thought of housing of any type in this area; therefore an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is required Commissioner Carr asked where the definition of affordable housing comes from. Planner Teague responded it was established by the Met Council. Commissioner Potts also asked Planner Teague if the City has established a definition for sustainable design principles. Teague responded at this time there is no definition. Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague if the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the previous proposal also included building height. Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Teague if the ramp that was proposed for the previous approved project for the medical office building was include in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR), and if so would the FAR be similar. Teague responded the ramp was not included in FAR, adding he believes if the ramp were included the FAR would be greater than the FAR of the new. proposal. Applicant Presentation Steve Michals thanked the Commission for their time and introduced the development team Ed Farr, Susan Farr and Luigi Bernardi. Ed Farr addressed the Commission reporting that the. proposal is for a senior care building that is 5- stories; plus one level of under - building parking at 228,842 square feet. Farr delivered a power point presentation including graphics indicating the building design presents an attractive facade using multiple colors of face brick, warm toned architectural precast concrete wall panels with a variety of surface finishes. Farr pointed out that the corner plaza area will offer outdoor seating coordinating with the City's initiative to upgrade the pedestrian experience. Concluding Farr stated that the NE building corner and France and 65th will still have its.distinctive glazed backlit crown. Steve Michals addressed the Commission and explained a number of the units would be high Page 5 of 12 end and include fireplaces. The building as proposed will contain interactive. features such as dining, hair dresser, exercise facilities and theater. Michals said the dining and theater amenities have been offered for use to residents of the Point of France and Cornelia Place. Michals indicated this proposal is different from the previous proposal as it engages the street. This change is because of the change in use. Michals further explained that this project continues to support the pedestrian environment along France with flower gardens and sitting areas similar to the previously approved medical office building. Continuing, Michals said similar to the previously approved project green building practices would be incorporated throughout all phases of the project. Concluding, Michals stated this project would benefit the entire community by creating new jobs, new senior services, increased tax base and a reduction in traffic congestion Commissioner Grabiel asked the status of the skyway; will it be built. Michals responded the skyway is part of the application and will be built. Commissioner Carr reiterated the importance of the word "senior" per Ordinance amendment and questioned if that word could become problematic for them. Ms. Farr responded the average age of their residents is 82 years; however, she agreed that for the transitional care component there is no age requirement and they could be younger than the typically accepted 55 years and older for senior designation. Continuing, Farr said Ebenezer is very excited about this location, adding they have been in the senior care industry for over 100 years. A discussion ensued on the affordability component of the project with Commissioners indicating they felt 4 units may not be sufficient. Commissioner Platteter asked Mr. Farr if they are keeping the existing boulevard trees. Mr. Farr responded in the affirmative, adding one tree will be removed to accommodate the construction of skyway. Platteter asked if the podium height element is similar to the previous plan. Mr. Farr responded it is similar; on the third level. Commissioner Potts questioned if (for this project) they would continue to work with Xcel Energy White Group; and if so; when the project is finalized provide measurability targets. Mr. Farr responded they would provide that information to the best of their ability at the time of final approval. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing.- Page 6 of 12 Public Comments Maria Field, Heritage of Edina, addressed the Commission and stated in her opinion there are more than enough assisted living facilities in Edina. Field also stated from her experience traffic --congestion will become an issue because there are many more deliveries to and from an assisted living care facility than people think (care givers, pharmacy deliveries, oxygen deliveries, etc.). Field asked the Commission to vote "No ". Kate Sones, Heritage of Edina, echoed Ms. Field that there are too many assisted living facilities within close proximity to each other. Sandy Havet, Heritage of Edina, agreed with previous comments and reported she found there are 30 assisted living facilities within 10 miles of the subject site. Bonnie Miller, Heritage of Edina, asked the Commission to vote Nay on the request, noting the impact from employee parking and traffic would be noticeable. Patty Schumaker, Heritage of Edina, informed the Commission Heritage is one of the few assisted living facilities in the area that accepts affordable housing senior waivers. Dale Johnson, 6566 France Avenue, #803, informed the Commission he sits on the Board of Directors for the Point of France and reported the Board hasn't conducted a formal survey soliciting residents opinion of the change in use; however, he learned from speaking with some residents that they were "fine" with the change in use; however, the density was too high. Ralph Laiderman, 6566 France Avenue, #402, told the Commission in his opinion the proposed assisted living facility is too dense., adding this density is overbuilding on the lot, pointing out the building as proposed would have the highest density in the City. Laiderman also questioned if the proposed balconies meet setback requirements. Concluding, Laiderman asked the Commission to encourage plan .revisions for a less dense assisted living facility. Dalia Katz, 6566 France Avenue, #503, reported that she too believes the density is too high, adding she is very worried how the construction of this building would impact her property values. Katz stated this project will increase parking demand and she is concerned visitors to the new facility may use the parking lot for the Point of France. Mary Kramer, 6566 France Avenue, #801 stated she believes as a result of the increased density traffic would increase, congestion would occur, including problems with parking. She explained she came face to face with the areas traffic congestion while attempting to cross France Avenue which resulted in an injury. Kramer read into the record a letter from Katherine Abbott, #308. Craig Alshouse, The Craig Company, 1300 Willowbrook Drive, (property owner of Cornelia Place) told the Commission in his opinion the developer has done a good job with the building's Page 7 of 12 design, adding he also supports the use; however, has a number of issues because of the impact this building would have on his residents at Cornelia Place. Alshouse said he sees three issues of concern. First issue building height; Alshouse said Cornelia Place residents were fine with the height of the approved parking ramp; however, if this proposal is approved as depicted the residents on the east would now be looking up, not down on a building and have expressed displeasure with this change. The second issue is the new location of the entrance for both delivery vehicles and residents. He added the previously approved plan had multiple entrances; not one and this change negatively impact residents. Alshouse noted the new delivery location will now be visible to Cornelia Place residents and the noise of these vehicles backing up would also be negative. Listening to beep beep beep all day from vehicles backing up would get very old fast. Alshouse also observed that the chillers have been relocated from the south side to the west (directly across from Cornelia Place), adding they "cry foul ". Concluding, Alshouse stated that the. third concern is density. The density as proposed is higher than anything he's seen in this area. Ron Calin, 6566 France Avenue, #901, said he can't argue with the use; it's a good one; however, traffic congestion is a grave concern. The traffic that exists within this area is very complex and with the expansion of Fairview Southdale Hospitals emergency component traffic will only get worse. Mark Waterston, 6566 France Avenue, #1203, stated he agrees with comments on traffic adding from the 12th floor he views the comings and goings of traffic. He pointed out the Hospital was "here first" and the additional traffic in this area would be felt. Jean Emrich, 6566 France Avenue, #508, addressed the Commission and stated she also believes noise from the proposed new building would negatively impact residents of the Point of France. She acknowledged the residential component of the plan is good but with the beeping of service vehicles the quality of life for the Point of France residents would be compromised. Nancy Otis, 6566 France Avenue, #1211, stated in her opinion the project is too big. She stated she is concerned with parking, traffic congestion and noise. She asked the Commission to force the development team to follow Code. Lloyd Thorsen, 6566 France Avenue, #610, urged the Commission to reconsider the request and asked the Commission to consider the density of the proposed building, increase in traffic and the fact that in the very near future Fairview Southdale Hospital would be adding an addition. Concluding, Thorsen said this project would change the area. Alan Erkie, 6566 France Avenue, #602, stated his view would be lost and the building is just too large for the space. Page 8 of 12 Susan Laiderman, 6566 France Avenue, #402 addressed the Commission and expressed her concern that the City of Edina doesn't have an ombudsman for residents of.multiunit properties, pointing out Edina recently hired a residential Redevelopment Coordinator to monitor the R -1 and R -2 zoned properties. She pointed out residents of the Point of France pay taxes too and there is no one to advocate for us. Laiderman said she would submit to City Staff letters from other residents of the Point of France. Chair Staunton thanked everyone for their participation in the public hearing process and asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Chair Staunton asked Chuck Rickart with WS.B to speak to the issue of parking and traffic congestion. Chuck Rickart acknowledged comments from those in the assisted living care industry and residents of the Point of France that traffic congestion is already an issue and this proposal would only add to it. Rickart said it's hard to reconcile the traffic analysis with what the neighbors stated. Rickart explained that traffic movements were evaluated for impacted intersections and the in /out to the site based on the existing conditions, projected 2014 build out and the projected 2030 build out. Levels of service were also monitored during both the AM and PM peak hours to include the daily traffic. The analysis also includes "use" and based on the studies it appears that traffic will increase; however, not at the rate of the previously approved medical office use proposal. Concluding, Rickart said at this time there are no recommendations for improvements to the France Avenue and 65th Street intersections; however should delays and queuing become an issue in the future the Aurora on France development would be responsible for their share of those improvements. Commissioner Forrest said her concern is more with the new access to the site. She pointed out this one access will be used for everything from deliveries to visitors. Chair Staunton commented that it appears from the traffic analysis that this proposal generates fewer movements than the past proposal. Rickart responded he agrees with that statement. Continuing, Staunton referred to the balconies and the possibility of their encroachment into the setback. Mr. Farr responded he believes the balconies "jut out" about 1 Meet, adding on the final plans the balconies will be addressed in greater detail. Planner Teague commented that "issue" would need further clarification to ensure variances aren't required. Continuing, Staunton said the comments from Mr. Alshouse about the impact this proposal would have on Cornelia Place made sense. The tenants on the east end of that building will now overlook service areas and would be subjected to numerous beep beep beeps from vehicles backing up, adding it's quite a change from the previous proposal. Mr. Farr responded that most of the delivery vehicles will be at a smaller scale with minimum backup. Farr also pointed out the "Memory Garden" will be visible to the upper levels. Page 9 of 12 Commissioner Carr asked Mr. Farr if he ever considered accessing the loading area off West 65th Street. Farr responded that because of the grade he doesn't believe that movement could occur; however is willing to take another look at it. Commissioner Platteter asked Mr. Farr how many service vehicle trips he expects per day /week. Mr. Farr said he believes the use will generate roughly 20 trips per week. Platteter agreed with Commissioner Carr's comment about relocating the loading dock area and also suggested limiting delivery hours. Ms. Farr interjected and explained that the majority of Ebenezer facilities limit delivery hours to daytime hours (9 -4). Platteter asked Planner Teague if there was a way to ensure that at least for large vehicles that loading and unloading could occur only during regular business hours. Teague responded that condition could be part of the PUD conditions. Commissioner Forrest asked Ms. Farr if she knows the number of workers a facility of this magnitude employs. Ms. Farr responded at this time she doesn't know the exact number; however, she reminded the Commission this facility operates 24/7 in three shifts. The discussion focused on the relocation of the chillers with Commissioners agreeing that the relocation of the chillers from the south side to the west directly impacted the residents of Cornelia Place not only visually but from noise. Commissioners stated they also want assurances that the chillers meet noise standards. Commissioners also wondered if the chillers could be moved to another location (roof). Commissioner Scherer commented if they consider relocating the chillers to the roof to keep in mind those chillers need to be adequately screened. Commissioner Grabiel stated he supports the proposal as submitted. He added he doesn't believe the Commission should interject their opinion on if there are "too many" senior housing facilities within a certain area any more than they would comment on if there are too many restaurants or drug stores within a certain area. Grabiel said there is a market demand for this product, reiterating he supports it. Concluding, Grabiel stated he feels the job of the Commission is to do what's best for the City. Commissioner Schroeder stated his concern with this proposal is that it no longer engages or enhances the pedestrian experience. Schroeder pointed out the previously approved "store front" concept and public access has been completely eliminated. He explained because of this change nothing draws the public in; nothing is proposed to attract human activity. Continuing, Schroeder reiterated that the goal of the City has been to engage the street. Farr acknowledged there is a change because of the use, adding for security reasons he doesn't believe people can just "walk in" off the street. Farr also pointed out seating and landscaped areas remain and would engage the pedestrian. Schroeder said he doesn't agree this proposal is better for France Avenue. Page 10 of 12 Commissioner Potts said he agrees with Commissioner Schroeder, adding he also has concerns with the west side of the site and believes the proposal negatively impacts the residents of Cornelia Place. Potts stated redesign is needed; it's a good project; however, it's not there yet, . adding he can't support the proposal as submitted. Commissioner Forrest stated she likes the use; however, not at this location. She said she views this area as a premiere regional medical location. Forrest said she remembers when the building across the street was constructed that the expressed vision for this area was regional medical; not residential. Concluding, Forrest said amending the Comprehensive Plan to allow this use also isn't agreeable with her. Commissioner Carpenter stated his concern is with the impact this proposal has on its neighbors; especially Cornelia Place. Commissioner Carr stated there are pros and cons with this project; however at the end of the day is in favor of the proposal as submitted with additional conditions. Carr said -in her opinion there is no reason to limit affordable housing to four units, the use of the word senior needs clarification, the chillers need to be relocated as per discussion and the setbacks for balconies need to be addressed. Commissioner Scherer stated she has no issue with the proposed use or density and is not worried about precedent setting; however, she is very concerned with the negative impact this building design imposes on the residents of Cornelia Place. Scherer concluded in her opinion the change to them is radical. Commissioner Platteter said he agrees with Commissioner Scherer's comments, adding if approved delivery times should be limited to daytime only. Chair Staunton noted that there appears to be issues with the project and asked the applicant if they would like to continue thi!�.twallow time for redesign or vote on the issue. After further discussion the applicants requested a vote. Motion Commissioner Carr moved to recommend approval of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and amendment to the PUD Zoning District for 6500 France Avenue based on staff findings; subject to staff conditions with additional conditions 1) increase affordable housing units from 4 to 10 %, 2) define what's meant by the word "senior", 3), address the setback issue with balconies, 4) relocate chillers as offered by Mr. Farr to the NE corner of the roof to include an attractive screen for the chillers. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Platteter offered an amendment that deliveries be limited to daytime hours (9- 4) this excluded emergency vehicles, and residents moving in and out. Amendment accepted. Page 11 of 12 Chair Staunton called the vote. Ayes; Carr, Platteter, Grabiel, Staunton. Nays; Scherer Schroeder, Carpenter, Potts, Forrest. Motion failed. S -4 Chair Staunton thanked everyone for their participation. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Schroeder reported that he attended the France Avenue meeting discussion On urban design, adding he would continue to update the Commission on this committee. Chair Staunton reported that the Living Streets committee is getting ready to T -up with Commissioner Carr expressing interest in joining the committee. Chair Staunton reported the Grandview Committee will soon be "firing up ", adding he will keep the Commission apprised of how that is going. Commissioner Platteter reminded the audience that the City Council will address the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments on July 16tH IX. STAFF COMMENTS 1►G7n X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Carr moved meeting adjournment at 11:30 pm. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted Page 12 of 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 24, 2013 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Potts, Platteter, Forrest, Carpenter, Carr, Staunton Absent from the roll: Scherer, Grabiel, Schroeder; Kilberg, Cherkassky III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Carpenter moved approval of the meeting agenda. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive addressed the Commission and informed them in his opinion houses undergoing extensive remodels should also have an overseer. Persha said large remodeling projects also have dumpsters in the front yard, porta -pots, parking issues, and construction noise similar to new construction. Persha suggested that the City establish tear down and remodel rosters that include photos of the property before construction. Continuing, Persha further stated he has another issue with redevelopment and it's with landscaping, adding in his opinion someone needs to oversee these remodeling projects to ensure that the yard is seeded /sodded in a timely manner and back to its original shape within a certain period of time; not years. Persha referred to Ordinance 480.02 which talks about time limits for construction, adding that the 12 month period for exterior finishes should be what the project is held to, and if more time is needed the applicant must reapply for another permit. Concluding, Persha also recommended review of the commercial projects. Chair Staunton thanked Mr. Persha for his comments and asked City Staff to consider his issues. Page 1 of 15 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Subdivision. Preliminary Plat. Shanight Addition. 5612 Tracy Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reported Rodney Helm on behalf of Tom and Gretchen Shanight is proposing to subdivide the property at 5612 Tracy Avenue into two lots. The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. To accommodate the request the following is required:A subdivision; and Lot width variances from 80.7 feet to 80 feet for each lot; lot depth variances from 157 feet to 122 feet; and lot area variances from 17,651 square feet to 9,820 square feet. Planner Aaker stated both lots would gain access off Tracy Avenue by a shared driveway, utilizing the existing driveway to the site. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 17,651 square feet, median lot depth is 157 feet, and the median lot width is 80.7. This is a neighborhood with varrying Lot sizes. Larger lots to the north across Vernon and to the east across Tracy Avenue have established the large minimum lot sizes for this property. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property in the same manner as the existing lots on the west side of Tracy Avenue . Aaker reported that a subdivision with similar circumstances was recently approved in this area at 5633 Tracy Avenue by the applicant. Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5612 Tracy Avenue; lot width variances from 80.7 feet to 80 feet for each lot; lot depth variances from 157 feet to 122 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 17,651 square feet to 9,820 square feet based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The proposal is consistent with the lots on this block on the west side of Tracy Avenue north of Hawkes Drive. 3. The 80 -foot wide lot is wider than the general standard required width of 75 feet. 4. The 9,820 square foot lots are larger than the general standard minimum lot area of 9,000 square feet. 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is roughly two times the size of every lot on-the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the blocks north of Hawkes Drive and west of Tracy Avenue. C. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. Page 2 of 15 d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, an 80- foot wide, 9,000+ square foot lot, which is common to the area. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Park dedication fee of $5,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 3. Vehicle access to these lots shall be off of Tracy Avenue. 4. Compliance with the conditions required by the director of engineering in his memo dated July 18, 2013. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. f. A private driveway easement established over Lot 1 to serve Lot 2 must be filed with Hennepin County. Appearing for the Applicant Rodney Helm Discussion Commissioner Forrest asked procedurally if the City Council hears this request twice. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative. Council hears the request for preliminary and final. Commissioner Carr questioned if the project were approved would the applicant be able to build houses on the lots without variances. Planner Aaker said the applicant indicated houses could be built without variances from the zoning ordinance. Chair Staunton asked Planner Aaker if the statistics were driven by the 500 -foot neighborhood, adding it seems like a large lot area variance is needed. Aaker agreed the lot area variance appears large; adding variances from the subdivision ordinance would be required. Commissioner Platteter asked for clarification on if the new houses would meet the zoning ordinance. Aaker reiterated the applicant did not indicate further variances would be needed. Page 3 of 15 Applicant Presentation Rodney Helm addressed the Commission informing them he is representing the Shanight's, property owners. Helm reported he was the agent that presented the Kiser Addition subdivision at 5633 Tracy, adding he is familiar with this neighborhood. Helm said if one looks at the 500 -foot neighborhood it appears to be two separate neighborhoods -west of Tracy and east of Tracy. Helm explained the reasons for the variances to the subdivision ordinance result from the fact when calculating the 500 -foot neighborhood both "neighborhoods" were included. Continuing, Helm said in his opinion this division would help create a strong corner for Hawkes Terrace. He said the existing home is an outdated four level home without much architectural value. Helm further stated that he believes retaining the driveway access off Tracy Avenue for both properties makes the most sense with less disruption to the site and neighbors. He also added close attention was and will be paid to the existing conditions on the site, including the grade and vegetation and of course vehicle access. Concluding, Helm acknowledged that the subdivision misses all three median requirements; width, area and depth; however, he believes the attention paid to the redevelopment of this site (topography, vegetation) will be a benefit to the neighborhood and Edina. Commissioner Carpenter asked Mr. Helm where the driveway access is for the homes directly across the street. Helm responded that he believes both properties access Hawkes. Helm said the proposed access off Tracy for the new lots really help "set up" the site for a good. redevelopment. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Hearings Tim Laughlin, 5705 Hawkes Terrace informed the Commission he lives directly across the street from the subject site. Laughlin stated he has lived in this neighborhood for many years, adding this corner worked for him all these years; however he can be agreeable to the proposed subdivision as submitted especially since the lots would be accessed off Tracy Avenue, not Hawkes Terrace. Terry Rocheford, 5604 Hawkes Terrace, told the Commission she doesn't have an issue with the subdivision; however wants assurances the access will be off Tracy Avenue. Rocheford said she has additional concerns about parking on the street and clear view when leaving Hawkes Terrace onto Tracy. Concluding, Rocheford asked the applicant to police the site and keep the tall grass mowed. Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Potts stated in his opinion this is a reasonable request adding he appreciates that the applicant paid close attention to the topography and vegetation when designing the plat. Page 4 of 15 Commissioner Carpenter stated he too feels the proposed subdivision is sensitive to the environment; however, he is somewhat concerned with the sight lines at the corner as expressed by Ms. Rocheford. Carpenter stated he wants assurances that house placement and topography are carefully assessed to ensure clear view in maintained. Commissioner Platteter commented that he likes how the developer is working with the land, adding in his opinion the shared driveway is a great option. If done as depicted it should create a good plat. Commissioner Carr stated she has no additional comments. Commissioner Forrest commented that it may be possible this site is one lot because of the terrain. She also expressed concern that any redevelopment of this lot would impact the urban canopy. Forrest encouraged the builder to be in contact with the neighbors during the construction process. Chair Staunton said he had an initial concern with the request because of the magnitude of the lot area variance; however, understands differing neighborhoods can play a role in "skewing" the numbers. Staunton stated he also has a strong preference for the driveway access to remain off Tracy Avenue as indicated on the plans. He further suggested the possibility of limiting parking to one side of the street to ensure greater visibility. Motion Commissioner Potts moved to recommend preliminary plat approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 7 -0. B. Final Rezoning; Final Plat and Final Development. Edina Fifty Five, LLC. 5109 -5125 49th Street West. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission Hunt Associates are requesting final review of the redevelopment of three lots located at 5109 -5125 West 491h Street. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two apartments and single family home on the site) and build a new 16 -unit attached housing development. The subject properties total 1.43 acres in size; therefore, the proposed density of the project would be 11 units per acre. Continuing, Aaker noted the applicant received preliminary rezoning and plan approval of this project on April 16, 2013. Aaker reported in order to obtain to approvals for the project, the following is the final step required for approval; Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to PUD and Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. Page 5 of 15 The proposed plans are consistent with the plans that were recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council; including reducing the density by eliminating one unit and reducing the height from four stories to three. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PRD -2, Planned Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, Final Development and Final Plat to plat and build 16 new townhomes on the subject 1.43 acre parcel subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan for the site. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which contemplates medium density housing for the site. 3. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. 4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. Currently the site does not engage Vernon Avenue. Today it is clearly the back of the site, and contains mature trees. The proposed site plan turns and faces Vernon Avenue with a row of two -story . townhomes. 5. Parking areas and garages are internal to the site, and not visible from 49th street or Vernon Avenue. 6. The project would enhance pedestrian connections. The plan provides for a public sidewalk through the site from 491h to Vernon, that would connect, not only this development, but the entire area to the north to the Grandview District. 7. Landscaping would be enhanced. Extensive Landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. The number of over story trees is over double the number required by City Code. The mature trees along Vernon Avenue would be preserved. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Utility plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 24, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped June 24, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. Page 6 of 15 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one -year after City Council approval. If the plat is not filed it shall be deemed null and void. 6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat. 7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. The park dedication fees are due prior to release of the final plat. 8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated July 19, 2013. 9. Compliance with the fire marshal recommendation in his email dated July 12, 2013. Appearing for the Applicant Chris Palkowitsch, BKV Group and D. Hunt, Hunt Associates Discussion Commissioner Car stated she was very happy to see that the unit count and building height was reduced. Carr asked which unit was removed. Mr. Palkowitsch responded that the NE unit was eliminated. Applicant Presentation Mr. Palkowitsch addressed the Commission and explained they listened to both the Planning Commission and City Council suggestions before submitting their final plans. As previously mentioned a unit was eliminated, building height was reduced, and the units along Vernon Avenue were pulled back. Also eliminated as per Commission and Council requests were the roof top deck options. The units along Vernon Avenue includes a buffer but continue to have presence on Vernon Avenue. Palkowitsch said one of the key elements of the improvements to the site is how the site is connected to greater Edina for both pedestrians and bikes. The proposed connection to Vernon increases access for the entire neighborhood. A sign is also proposed identifying the development. Continuing, Palkowitsch said sustainability goals include retaining as much of the mature vegetation and trees as possible, including a good vegetative buffer from the surrounding traffic for those homes on Vernon Avenue. Palkowitsch said building materials have been changed from wood to stone and fiber cement with stucco to match the stone. Concluding, Palkowitsch said they accept the recommendations from the City Engineer; however are opposed to the request for a 5 -foot grass area between the roadway and sidewalk on Vernon Avenue. Discussion Commissioner Forrest commented that she appreciates the attention paid to the existing vegetation; Page 7 of 15 however, wishes there was a tree survey that better identifies what's there and what will be added. Commissioner Potts stated that he isn't sure how he feels about the proposed monument sign in a residential neighborhood. Mr. Palkowitsch reported ordinance allows 24 square foot identification sign. Commissioner Platteter said his concern is how the neighborhood would be impacted during the construction process. He added he wants the project to be policed per the new ordinance 411. Planner Aaker responded 411 pertain to single and double dwelling units. Platteter acknowledged that fact; however pointed out the residential homes across the street would be greatly impacted as a result of this redevelopment. Commissioner Carr commented that she tends to agree with Engineer Houle's recommendation of a boulevard style sidewalk for the units facing Vernon Avenue. Commissioner Forrest agreed, adding the intent is to develop sidewalks away from the roads; it's safer. Commissioner Platteter stated he too agrees with Houle on providing some boulevard area; however, without a plan to view it's difficult to comment on. Platteter said he's not sure there is adequate spacing to accommodate that boulevard while retaining yard space for the units. A discussion ensued on the recommendation from Engineer Houle regarding providing a boulevard along Vernon Avenue. Commissioners expressed the opinion that they agreed with Houle's comments initially; however, because of the future possibility of realigning the exit ramp and to continue to provide adequate spacing for the Vernon Avenue units it's difficult to make an educated guess on if this boulevard request would work as requested by Houle; or if it needs some form of tweaking to ensure the units on Vernon Avenue remain viable. Mr. Hunt expressed the opinion that moving the units back from Vernon Avenue would be difficult because the site was designed with what exists, pointing out the real possibility that in the future the exit ramp could be reconfigured. Commissioner Platteter agreed they don't have adequate information on potential roadway changes and requirements. Commissioner Carr asked Planner Aaker if the City requires the requested boulevard area. Planner Aaker said at this time it isn't a requirement; however the City is going in that direction as mentioned by Commissioner Forrest. Chair Staunton noted the change per Fire Marshall on the drive aisle width from 18 -feet to 20 -feet and questioned if that would be a problem. Mr. Palkowitsch responded at this time they are working with the Fire Marshall on that requirement. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Hearing Mary Hartupee, 5016 Edenbrook Lane, pointed out Vernon Avenue is a very busy street and trying to maintain green boulevard space would be difficult. She pointed out the requested 5 -foot boulevard would also be difficult to maintain because of the high volume of traffic and materials used by the street crew during winter weather. Hartupee thanked the developers for fine tuning this project; adding it's a better project than before. Hartupee also suggested erecting a stop sign for those exiting Page 8 of 15 the development. Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the project; being none Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Continued Discussion Commissioner Forrest said the goal of the PUD process is to find solutions for both sides; adding she believes this project is superior to what was originally presented. Forrest said she is also in favor of Engineer Houle's requirements including the boulevard along Vernon Avenue; but isn't sure in what form that boulevard should be. Forrest acknowledged the juggling act between privacy vs. engagement for the Vernon Avenue units. Chair Staunton said he understands the request for the buffer along Vernon Avenue; acknowledging it does create a change in plans for the Vernon Avenue units; noting, the idea of the buffer is to provide more safety for pedestrians. Continuing, Staunton reiterated the requested change to boulevard along Vernon may be an issue that needs further review. He suggested a 6 -foot sidewalk closer to the street be looked at; however, on this point he isn't sure. Staunton said he agrees with Houle on storm water retention and the Fire Marshall on drive aisle width. Staunton commented he was unsure about a stop sign exiting the site. Mr. Hunt said if the Commission really objects to the monument sign it will not be built. Hunt said the proposed sign not only identifies the development but helped screen the mechanical box equipment. Commissioner Forrest said this development would be a very nice welcome to the neighborhood. Commissioner Potts said in his opinion this project is positive for the neighborhood. The additions of a simple sidewalk and bike walkway is a great amenity to access Vernon Avenue. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Final Development and Final Rezoning to PUD and a zoning ordinance amendment establishing the PUD subject to staff conditions (all staff) and the additional condition that this project be reviewed under Ordinance 411; the Residential Construction Maintenance Plan; citing the residential nature directly across the road. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. A brief discussion ensued on the sidewalk /boulevard area on Vernon Avenue. It was recommended that the applicants address the request from the City Engineer and negotiate with Council if this request won't work. It was further suggested that if revised they buffer as much as possible using the existing grade to provide the Vernon Avenue units with enough yard /patio space. Commissioners observed without graphics it was difficult to envision the area with the recommended boulevard. The discussion also acknowledged that in the future the public right of way will change along with the potential for realignment of the exit ramp. It was further noted that the traffic exiting Highway 100 onto Vernon will continue to require access to Interlachen Boulevard Chair Staunton said his suggestion of a 6 -foot wide sidewalk (near street) with 4 + feet of boulevard was Page 9 of 15 a compromise that may work; however as previously mentioned without seeing it it is difficult to design or envision. It was further suggested that staff conditions (all) be available for review at the Council level. Concluding, Commissioners thanked the developers for their response to their earlier comments adding in their opinion this will be a good project and possibly the first in the redevelopment of the Grandview area. Ayes; Carpenter, Potts, Platteter, Carr, Forrest, Staunton. Motion carried. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review— Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group — 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re- develop 5801 Edina Industrial Boulevard from office uses to retail uses including a drive - through. Currently the building on.the site contains a real estate office, a hair loss treatment center, a telecommunication switching site and a small vacancy formerly occupied by a builder office /showroom. The applicant, Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group, would like to repurpose and remodel the existing building with neighborhood retail services. Aaker explained to accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. A Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. Continuing, Aaker reported that the property is located just west of Highway 100 and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Uses include a gas station, Burger King, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. The proposed use of the property would be consistent with the existing land uses to the south. Aaker noted this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Page 10 of 15 Council." Therefore, the decision to require a Small Area Plan can be made by the City Council at the Sketch Plan review. Appearing for the Applicant David Anderson, Frauenshuh and Nick Sperides, SRa Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson addressed the Commission and reported their intent is to rezone the property from POD1, (Planned Office District) to PCD2, (Planned Commercial District). Anderson explained this is a sizeable employment area, adding their goal is to repurpose the property to better serve neighborhood commercial service demands and the economic viability of the property. With. graphics Anderson pointed out "before" and "after" schematics of the property noting the building is low level. If the Commission and Council are agreeable to repurposing the property the following changes to the property would include: • Implement an updated landscape plan • Improve and repair the building's exterior, to include lighting, awnings and other architectural features • Create a better pedestrian experience by including walkways and outdoor seating areas • Potential for a drive - through option • Reconfigure the parking in keeping with ordinance requirements and • Improved internal vehicle access and circulation. Concluding Anderson asked the Commission for their opinion on the sketch plan. Discussion Commissioner Platteter commented that he likes the concept; however, believes this is a hard site to get in and out of. Platteter suggested reconsidering access points (eliminate west entry along Edina Ind. Blvd.) and changing the location of the proposed drive - through; possibly to the rear. Continuing, Platteter also suggested energizing the corner of Metro Blvd /Edina Inc. Blvd. to be more pedestrian friendly. Concluding, Platteter stated he understands the requested change, adding it would continue the synergy of the areas service component; however, this is a hard site. Mr. Sperides responded that they looked at different scenarios for the drive - through but found out that moving it to the rear wouldn't work because of the three lanes (in, out & Drive - through), circulation and the difficulty in ensuring that the driver is on the proper side. Commissioner Platteter agreed driver placement was an issue, he noted in the Grandview area a drive - through is located between buildings; in the middle. Mr. Sperides added they are open to revisiting drive - through placement, adding they don't know if a drive - through would be part of the equation; however, want that option kept open because it's important to retail. Continuing, Sperides said another point they needed to keep in mind was stacking. Platteter agreed, adding as presented he is unsure if stacking would be adequate. Mr. Page 11 of 15 Sperides pointed out adequate stacking capacity is also very important for the retailer; without adequate stacking the business would suffer too. Chair Staunton commented that it is important to both the Commission and City Council that adequate stacking space is provided for drive - through window components. Staunton asked the applicant what their vision is for this property. Mr. Anderson said Frauenshuh observed this area was undergoing a change and creating an opportunity to repurpose the property in response to that change would benefit everyone. Anderson said what they do know is that the employment base is there and retail services to respond to that base are needed. Continuing, Anderson said the vision is to capture the current activity in a positive manner. Anderson added in his opinion this area has become more of a mixed use area, reiterating the introduction of more retail is good. Commissioner Potts stated in his opinion this area is very challenging and if redeveloped a complete traffic analysis needs to be completed. Planner Aaker responded if a formal application to rezone the property is submitted a traffic analysis is a requirement of that process. Commissioner Carr said she realizes this is only in the "sketch plan" phase; however if redeveloped she would like the applicant to pay attention to aesthetics; such as lighting, landscaping, outdoor seating areas, etc. to create a more attractive place to visit and view. Anderson commented the intent would be to revitalize the site. Commissioner Forrest commented that she's not sure she's on board with the rezoning request. Forrest said she is concerned with parking, vehicle circulation and the potential drive - through space. Continuing, Forrest pointed out as previously mentioned by Commissioner Potts that much depends on the outcome of the traffic analysis. Mr. Anderson said the initial thought was to gain Commission and Council input on the proposed rezoning. Anderson said if that support was present it would allow them to prepare a site plan supported by a completed market and traffic analysis for formal review. Anderson explained that is the reason why the plans presented aren't firm, reiterating they felt the first step was to gain input on the rezoning. A discussion ensued on if the Commission felt extending the PCD zoning designation to this side of the street makes sense. Commissioners expressed the opinion that pedestrian and vehicle safety is of the utmost importance, pointing out the volume of activity is this "neighborhood" is very high. Commissioners also observed that it is difficult to make a decision without the facts; such as tenant mix and how that mix relates to traffic. Page 12 of 15 Commissioner Forrest asked Planner Aaker if the site were rezoned would all uses within the PCD -2 zoning district be allowed. Aaker responded in the affirmative; adding parking requirements need to be met for each use which could limit uses. The discussion continued on the rezoning clarifying without the traffic analysis and knowledge of the uses in the tenant space it is difficult to make an educated decision. Commissioners suggested moving forward keeping in mind how important the relationship is between traffic and use. It was further noted that if it is found that pedestrians do want to cross the street both ways having these amenities makes sense and would be of benefit to the area and areas users. Mr. Anderson thanked the Commission for their comments, adding they would speak with City staff before submitting the sketch plan to the City Council. B. Residential Redevelopment Ordinance — Recap from City Council Meeting Chair Staunton reminded the Commission of the numerous meetings held on residential redevelopment and amending the Zoning Ordinance. Staunton said the Commission forwarded their final draft to the City Council for their July 16th meeting. Staunton stated he along with Commissioners Forrest and Potts attended that meeting to present the Commission's recommendations. Staunton stated after Council action there was concern that the Council didn't understand the intent of the Commission on specific issues; mainly building height, 2nd story step elimination and setbacks. Chair Staunton said in speaking with City Staff he felt there was a need to reiterate to the Council the Commissions intent on one set of items ( #3 per memo) and referred the Commission to the attached statement of intent and graphics. Clarifying Staunton said at their July 16th meeting the Council adopted a 30 -foot cap on building height and elimination of the second floor setback; however declined to adopt the side yard setback formula. Staunton added he doesn't want to second guess the Council and is agreeable with their decision; however, reiterated he wants to make sure they understood the Commissions intent on side yard setback as part of a "bundle" that works simultaneously. Staunton referred to the table provided in the Ordinance amendment on side yard setbacks and wondered if the Council thought this table was too cumbersome. Staunton said the goal of the Commission was also to provide the public with greater clarity in the Ordinance; however, the Council may not have felt this was achieved in the Commission's final draft. Staunton told the Commission he would be forwarding his statement along with the graphics provided by Commissioner Potts to the Council before their final reading on the Ordinance amendments at their August 5th meeting. Staunton asked the Commission for their input on the "statement ". He acknowledged the statement also recommends that on lots narrower than 75 -feet in width that there be at least a total of 25% of the lot width (with a minimum setback no less than what currently exists). Page 13 of 15 This formula may bring greater simplicity and clarity than the sliding scale originally proposed or the setback chart provided by the Commission. Concluding, Staunton reiterated that he wants the Council to know that the opinion of the Commission was that this was a three part "bundle "; building height, eliminate 2 "d floor setbacks and side yard setback. Staunton noted that the Commission wasn't wedded to any particular mechanics for accomplishing this; however, creating additional space between structures on small lots was their goal. Staunton said he was sorry.he wasn't clear enough with the Council and asked the Commission their opinion on his statement. Commissioner Carpenter said in his opinion it is a good statement and fine as written pointing out the statement doesn't instruct the Council. A discussion ensued on the statement and graphics prepared by Chair Staunton and Commissioner Potts, noting the intent of the Commission was to provide greater setbacks on smaller lots, adding the statement (or another form) with attachments should be forwarded to the Council. Commissioner Carr said she was concerned the addition of the 25% total lot width formula may also be confusing; however, reiterated the intent was to provide adequate spacing on smaller lots. Carr reiterated that it was at the suggestion of the Commission that staff provide the table found in the draft Ordinance presented to Council on the 16th. Commissioner Potts said the intent of the Commission was to reduce building height, increase side yard setbacks on smaller lots and eliminate the 2nd story setback formula. Potts said the referenced 25% of lot width included in the statement was intended to be a clearer way to increase setback on lots less than 75 -feet in width. Potts acknowledged the table prepared by staff was at the request of the Commission. Commissioner Forrest stated she continues to be concerned that the Ordinance amendments may not have went "far enough ". Forrest pointed out in the one.story and one and one half story neighborhoods a large two story house can still be constructed changing the character of that neighborhood. Forrest said the 25% lot width is another tool to provide greater setbacks, adding the Ordinance can be revisited if it is found the amendments aren't providing the relief intended. Commissioner Carr said the intent in her opinion was an Ordinance easier to understand and implement while providing adequate spacing. Chair Staunton asked the Commission to vote on forwarding the statement with graphics to the City Council for their August 5th meeting. Staunton said he would leave it up to City Staff on now to convey this message. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to forward the statement and graphics provided by Chair Staunton and Commissioner Potts to the August 5, 2013, meeting of the City Council. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Page 14 of 15 C. Living Streets Working Group —Appoint Planning Commission reps to working group Chair Staunton stated that Commissioners Carr and Platteter have expressed interest in serving on the Living Streets working group and asked for a motion to formally nominate them to those positions. Motion Commissioner Potts moved to appoint Commissioner Carr and Commissioner Platteter to serve as representatives of the Planning Commission on the Living Streets working group. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; Carr and Platteter appointed as members of the Living Streets working group. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Staunton said he attended his first Grandview Committee meeting, adding he and Michael Schroeder are serving on the Committee and will periodically report back to the Commission. Staunton reported that Mike Fischer and Jennifer Janovy chair the group. Commissioner Carr commented that she thinks it may be a good idea for staff to apprise the Commission about remodels; along with tear down rebuilds. Staunton agreed adding he would check with staff to see when Cindy Larson the new Redevelopment Coordinator has time to report to us on what she found "out on the streets ". Learning about enforcement would be good for the Commission. IX. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Carr moved meeting adjournment at 10:05 PM. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. ,9ackte &oo_geaakke� Respectfully submitted Page 15 of 15 MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, July 9, 2013 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:05 P.M. II. ROLL CALL - New Member Michael Birdman was introduced Answering roll call were Members Moore, Mellom, Christiaansen, O'Brien, Weber, and Birdman. Absent were Members Sussman, McDermott, Holtan, Good and Johnson. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel was also in attendance. 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Christiaansen moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Weber seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.- IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES June 11, 2013 Member Mellom moved to approve the minutes from the June 11, 2013 meeting. Member Christiaansen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None VI. WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS TOUR Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel led the board on a tour of the West Minneapolis Heights area in the Presidents neighborhood. Mr. Vogel began the tour with a brief history of the area which dates back to the mid -1850, well before Edina was incorporated in 1888. Referring to photos of some of the older significant homes provided by Member Weber; Mr. Vogel explained the development patterns and the prevalent architectural styles of the homes. Board members observed that the properties north of Belmore Lane were developed first, with the area south of Belmore built predominantly in the post war era. They also commented that they found the area to be much more diverse than they would have expected with a large concentration of eclectic architectural styles, much like the Morningside neighborhood. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes July 9, 2013 In a recap of the tour, board members agreed that they enjoyed getting out of the conference room and seeing the area first -hand and in context with its surroundings. Also observing that the experience provides a perspective one doesn't get when reading a report and looking at photographs. Planner Repya observed that those are prevalent comments heard after every annual tour, which is why the walk- abouts have become a favorite summer activity for the HPB. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS -None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Mellom announced that she has asked the Hennepin County Barr Association to consider offering continuing legal education classes that address legal issues relative to preservation. The Bar Association's Real Property Section officers are considering her request and will make a decision later this year. Ms. Mellom agreed to keep the HPB advised if the Bar Association decides to offer continuing education classes addressing preservation matters. X. STAFF COMMENTS Historic House Tour - Planner Repya announced that the Historical Society is planning a Historic Home Tour on September 15`h when the public will have the opportunity to view the Baird House, 4400 W. 50'' Street (former HPB Member Forrest's home), a Country Club District Home at 4506 Arden Avenue (HPB Member Mellom's home), and a Morningside Bungalow at 4006 W. 44'h Street. The tour is an event planned as part of the City's Quasquicentennial celebration, and tickets will soon be available for purchase at City Hall. The Historical Society has asked if the HPB would like to participate in the tour. Ms. Repya stated that she planned on having information available at each of the homes explaining the historic significance of each. She also encouraged any board member interested in participating in the tour to let her know. State Preservation Conference — September 12 & 13 — Lanesboro, MN — Ms. Repya reminded the board that the upcoming State Preservation Conference is scheduled for September 12 and 13 in Lanesboro, MN. Because Edina is a Certified Local Government (CLG), we are required to send at least one board member to the annual conference. Currently, Member Sussman has indicated that he plans to attend the conference, and she encouraged the board member to consider adding this worthwhile conference to their schedules. She added that because Edina is a CLG there are scholarship funds available to pay for the conference and lodging. The board thanked Ms. Repya for the reminder and agreed to let her know if they would be able to attend. 2 ' Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes July 9, 2013 XI. NEXT MEETING DATE August 1.3, 2013 XII. ADJOURNMENT 8:30,p:m. Member O'Brien moved for adjournment at 8:30 p.m. Member Birdman seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried: Respectfully submitted; Joyce 2 epya 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL July 9, 2013 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Ih ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Deeds, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Dan Peterson. 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Deeds, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Dan Peterson. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA IV A APPFeyal eF Minutes — Regular. Dn.L Re-ar-d MeetiAg Gf juRe 11 9091 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA W.A. REGULAR PARK BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 1, 2013 —APPROVED AS AMENDED. Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, correcting the regular meeting minutes of June 11, 2013, page three, paragraph 10, during Chair Steel's discussion of accessibility to parks via sidewalks, add the phrase: "because the policy only talks about every child's access to a school, not a park ". Chair Steel requested a second change on page four, paragraph one, immediately after the phrase "Chair Steel asked about putting in a pedestrian bridge" to add: "for the Richfield School District children ", followed by the existing "to access Strachauer Park ", with a final addition of: "since the closest park is Rosland in that area ". Ayes: Members Deeds, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Dan Peterson. Motion carried. Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Cella, approving the regular minutes of June 11, 2013, as corrected. Ayes: Members Deeds, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Celia, Jones, Dan Peterson. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. Vt. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. 54th Street and Arden Park Stormwater Management Plan Ms. Kattreh introduced the two consultants present to assist in the discussion, Paul Pasko and Caitlin Badger. Mr. Pasko introduced Ms. Badger noting she will provide an overview of the 54th Street project as well as the Stormwater Management Plan. She noted the first topic under discussion is 54th Street from Wooddale to France and she asked for the Park Board to raise issues and questions of concern. Mr. Pasko noted that tonight's meeting is not the time for offering solutions, but rather is primarily about getting questions and concerns on the table. Member Gieseke asked about the issue of access to the creek, specifically those wanting to canoe, as well as parking space challenges. He also brought up traffic issues in the area. Member Jones brought up the issue of access safety thinking, specifically getting out of the water safely and getting from one side to the other safely. Member Deeds brought up trail access and float access, as well as improved aesthetics in the area. Member Cella asked about impact on the parkland that is already present. Mr. Pasko stated that is still undetermined. The emphasis for 54th Street seems to be on the right -of -way; everything is on the table as data is collected. Member Dan Peterson asked if Arden Park is part of a flood plain. He recalled that over 30 years ago the city installed a bigger, better bridge. He also asked what legal entities will be involved. Mr. Pasko responded that Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is involved as well as the DNR and the Corp of Engineers. Member Dan Peterson brought up the issue of limited parking as well as speeding. He noted that he has also seen kids fishing in that area. a Member Deeds asked about the amenities at Arden Park to which Ms. Kattreh responded there is a hockey rink, free - skating rink, shelter building, canoe landing, playground and a trail through the park. Chair Steel stated she used to tube down there quite a bit when she was younger, especially when she was a nanny for two younger kids. The main issues were finding a spot to park bikes and getting there safely while both walking and biking. Member Deeds stated this might be an opportunity to use potential native filtration, marshes, plants and other things that would encourage wildlife around the park. Member Jones stated it looks as if the area north of the bridge is flooded. Mr. Pasko summarized that one question might be how to make the flood waters a feature rather than an impediment when they are present. Member Jones stated the bridge is not wide enough for pedestrians, bikes and cars. It would be ideal to not have a bike lane disappear while getting on the bridge. Member Deeds encouraged thinking about how to get off the bridge. He stated it is a safety and aesthetic issue. The more the bike lanes can be separated from the walking paths the better. Mr. Pasko noted that on Minnetonka Boulevard there is a separate bridge of 10 or 15 feet for bikes only. 2 Chair Steel asked if there is a lot of biking activity for children in that area to which Ms. Kattreh replied there are some bikes going through there. The majority of activity she has seen is mothers with strollers as well as dog walkers. Chair Steel asked about the trail composition and Ms. Kattreh responded it is asphalt. Member Deeds stated there is a larger discussion in the city about bike paths, so what happens here should be built in consideration of those discussions of the non - auto -based transportation system. Member Gieseke stated there is a greater need for recreational programming. Member Jones stated there are a lot of needs for the park but that can be left for future discussion of aging shelter buildings. All research shows it is good to put in painted lanes on streets, but those painted lanes do not increase the number of people biking. The way to increase biking is to have protected bike lanes. She noted that is a very narrow street and as a mother she is not sure about the comfort level of letting children biking on that street. She encouraged the design to have either protected bike lanes or a wide enough sidewalk to be a multi -use trail. She wants people to feel comfortable about biking to parks and to the Edina Aquatic Center. Member Cella echoed comments about a separate biking trail, particularly since 54`h Street takes traffic from east to west in Edina and is used significantly during rush hour for commuter traffic. Member Jacobson brought up the issue of being very purposeful about lighting, as there is currently not a lot of lighting in that area. Member Deeds stated it is important to have properly focused lighting, as there is often so much energy wasted in street lighting. Mr. Pasko stated as plans start to take shape, he encouraged the Park Board to consider the long -term plan of the park. That will impact where things get placed. Member Jones stated as far as she knows there are no plans for design on the park. The shelter building is at least 20 years old. Ms. Kattreh stated it was probably built in the 1970s. Member Cella suggested there should be a subcommittee to think through the park layout. Chair Steel stated this is a unique feature and she would like to see what the consultants can propose and then what can be accommodated in the city's plan. Member Jones noted that the Park Board has never had this opportunity during a street reconstruction to make comments, so this is unusual. This is a time when the city is bringing the community together to discuss needs and desires with respect to streets. This may also be a good time to re- evaluate parks. It may be that this is a perfect time for the community to say what they would like in their parks so that plans for redevelopment of neighborhood parks can have the same type of calendar for streets. Both streets and playgrounds have approximately 20 -year life cycles, so perhaps they could be scheduled on a similar timeline. Ms. Badger stated feedback is being collected on the park as well and that information will be available to the city for now or later. Member Gieseke noted that the River Walk in San Antonio has interesting, bold ideas that could be incorporated, whether it is a boardwalk, seasonal entertainment or a community gathering space. Member Jones stated it looks like the street has already been reconstructed to France. Mr. Pasko noted that a few years back curb and gutter were added and there was an overlay rather than a complete reconstruction. Ms. Badger thanked the Park Board for their feedback. She encouraged any further comments or concerns as they may come to mind. Mr. Pasko concluded with a brief overview of the timeline of the projects moving forward. VI.B. Sports Dome and Athletic Field Recommendation Ms. Kattreh introduced Susie Miller, Braemar Arena Manager, who has worked on the pro forma for the Sports Dome and provided a lot of information on the potential for an outdoor refrigerated rink. Ms. Kattreh also introduced Kathy Wallace, an architect from the Cunningham Group, who has provided architectural services for the Sports Dome as well as the Golf Dome. Ms. Kattreh outlined the four renderings of the options for the Sports Dome, noting all options are at the Braemar athletic field site. Options A and C, as outlined in the Power Point presentation and board packet, are the two viable options still under consideration, as Options B and D were quickly eliminated from consideration. She noted the details are not yet worked out with the Fire Department. Staff believes there is sufficient room to meet fire code requirements, but some adaptations might be needed as the process moves along. Ms. Kattreh noted staff was pleased to find out that the cost estimates do not vary much between Options A and C; the range is $5.3 million to $6 million, with an approximate additional $2 million for a refrigerated outdoor ice rink. Ms. Kattreh noted they wanted to maximize the space available and also allow for a wider field; making it more marketable and with the ability to run games east /west as well as north /south. Member Cella asked about the additional costs for Option C. Ms. Kattreh noted those costs are higher due to the retaining walls and grading as well as a higher cost in the extra fabric in a 250 -foot dome. Member Jacobson asked whether plans include a walking or running track around the edge to which Ms. Kattreh responded affirmatively. She noted it would be very similar to the Maple Grove dome, which was included in the Park Board packet. Ms. Kattreh noted that the costs presented in the report are just construction costs and do not include anything related to operations. The included pro forma covers operational revenues and expenses. She stated the goal for this pro forma was to ensure the dome would be sustainable without additional funding from the city. Therefore, staff has discussed with Edina athletic associations implementing a $30 per participant priority use fee for scheduling the dome. She has worked with Lacrosse, Soccer, Baseball, and Football to agree to give them priority scheduling of the dome, with the $30 per person fee, which would guarantee the City $95,310 in annual dome operations. Staff will also go out to secure non -Edina groups, but this was a way to secure finances with groups who have the most interest in the dome. 4 Ms. Kattreh discussed a variety of future programming options as well as the business plan to develop relationships with non - residents who will use the dome. Chair Steel asked about the possibility of event rentals at the dome. Ms. Kattreh responded affirmatively, noting rentals are something that will be considered for the dome. She also noted that over 15 years the priority use access fees would accumulate to over $1.4 million. Chair Steel encouraged the priority use policy to be created in such a way to encourage equity, with the goal of avoiding some of the same difficulties being faced right now. Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that at the guidance of Parks and Recreation consultants, staff worked with the athletic associations to revise and enhance the pro forma. She highlighted some of those changes, noting the expenses are conservative and revenues are confirmed. The hours and schedule are confirmed as well as the priority use fee. She also noted that at year 15 the dome will have reached a 115% cost recovery. Chair Steel asked about the ages of players and whether there will be enough space for families to visit, particularly as it relates to playgrounds or other amenities. Ms. Kattreh stated there will be a wide age range of players from little kids to older kids. She pointed out the site might be very tight if the option that eliminates the current playground is selected; however, amenities are something to consider. She noted there is a very welcoming common area and concession stand for parents who might want to hang out while kids are practicing. Discussion ensued regarding the life expectancy of the turf and the dome itself and whether the sinking fund would be able to cover those replacement costs. Ms. Kattreh discussed the outdoor refrigerated rink, and that the east arena needs to be switched from R22 to ammonia for refrigeration by the year 2020. She noted the pro forma is based upon a 17 -week season though favorable weather would allow for a 19 -week season. Member Deeds asked about a warming house. Ms. Kattreh responded staff has not vetted all the options, including a heated bench, a roof, and access to restrooms. Member Cella asked whether an additional outdoor piece of ice was on the original list of priorities. Ms. Kattreh responded that it was not, though staff wanted to ensure they did not miss out on any opportunities and wanted to at least consider any options while working with the consultants. Member Jacobson asked whether the ice rink area can be used for a potential field in the summer. Ms. Kattreh stated a concrete base will give the rink the longest life; some cities use it as a BMX or a skateboard park. Member Jones asked what makes up the $2 million price tag for the ice rink. Ms. Kattreh explained a large portion of it would be connecting the refrigeration mechanism from the east arena as well as the rink, as well as tubing, boards, engineering and architect fees and other soft costs. She stated the $2 million is a realistic cost unless something like a roof over the ice arena is considered. Member Jacobson asked how this would impact the scheduling issues with the hockey and figure skating club. Ms. Kattreh said it might help alleviate the situation, but would not solve it as hockey rents such a large number of hours. 5 Member Deeds asked about space for parking if the dome and ice rink are fully booked. Ms. Miller replied the big high school games present the most parking challenges, which happen about six times per season. Ms. Kattreh noted there might be a 10 percent savings if one construction contract included both the dome as well as the outdoor refrigerated rink. Various possible economies of scale were discussed. Chair Steel stated choices need to be made regarding whether this is a great place for kids and parents to come together or whether it is just a place for kids to be dropped off. Those other possible amenities could be discussed down the road. Ms. Kattreh. asked the Park Board to voice whether there is interest in the outdoor refrigerated ice. Member Deeds stated the dome and the athletic field improvements are top priority. He stated most of the problem is that most of the fields are not built to withstand most of our weather and are not built to drain. Member Jones thanked staff for thinking about the outdoor ice rink; she does not know where it fits in with the priorities of Braemar Arena and whether this is a need that should be acted on this year and whether there is funding for it. She is intrigued by it, since other communities do have a lot of ice time, but she does not know if this is going to be in the budget. Ms. Kattreh noted that ties in with Member Deeds' point — if there was $2 million to spend, should it be spent on an ice rink or spent on renovating five athletic fields? Member Cella commented that renovating more fields is a priority over ice. But if plans for the dome proceed, it makes sense to leave space for the ice rink. 1� Member Gieseke asked whether discussions have been had with the hockey folks who are raising money for the Hornet's Nest. Ms. Kattreh stated no, those conversations have not been had due to lack of time, but it is a good idea. Ms. Kattreh stated one point worth noting is that if the city is going to put a rink there, it is an ideal location because it is very shaded and protected. Member Deeds stated the space should definitely be reserved for an ice rink, but the timing is unknown. Ms. Kattreh indicated staff has spent time studying the current field use and field needs and has determined there is a need for a minimum of two full -sized rectangular fields. Sometimes associations limit numbers of players because of lack of field availability; city programming is also limited due to field space limitations. Inclement weather significantly impacts the majority of the fields due to poor drainage and proximity to creeks and lakes. The Edina Soccer Club cancelled 825 practices and games due to the unusually wet spring. Ms. Kattreh highlighted some significant facilities needing improvement that would greatly impact programs and associations. The first field highlighted is Creek Valley School Park, which happens to be on School District property but is maintained by the city. She estimated that changing to sand fields would cost $450,000 per field. This is a primary facility for youth soccer programs. She also highlighted Cornelia School Park, where playability could be improved as well. She also highlighted Pamela Park, where $2.3 million of improvements are needed, including a sand -peat field, a turf field, parking lots and lighting. Those improvements were originally slated within the city's CIP but were then removed. D Member Deeds thanked Ms. Kattreh for all the work put into the study of the fields. He expressed support in a combination of the two, -- investments in the fields as well as the dome. Ms. Kattreh provided an overview of the timeline moving ahead. She noted that City Council will have to decide whether bonding would be an option for the project. She added in 2017 the last park bond referendum will be paid off that was originally issued in 1997. Ms. Kattreh stated there, is the potential to add a couple athletic fields on the east side of Fred Richards Golf Course if the golf course is turned back into a park, but that is still very premature. Member Jones agreed with Member Deeds' comments that this is an important thing to move forward on, but she does not want to see a net loss of playing fields; looking at it as a package is important. She encouraged looking into geothermal options to help reduce energy costs. She suggested a subcommittee within the Park Board to pursue other energy options and in particular what other communities are doing. Member Jones proposed the city seriously look into other funding methods or for a capital campaign. She noted the Hornet's Nest was a good example of private funding to the city and providing 25 percent of the project. That enabled the city to create a really nice facility. She suggested looking into private funding or naming rights so the city is not the only option for paying for capital expenses. She commended the work of the Parks and Recreation consultants; all of the recommendations from the June 18 feasibility study make a whole lot of sense. Chair Steel thanked Ms. Kattreh and Ms. Miller for their efforts in putting all this information together. Member Dan Peterson asked about rounds of golf played at the Fred Richards Golf Course. Ms. Kattreh stated that she does not know but that staff can obtain those numbers. Vll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VILA. Council Updates None. VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Cella asked whether the summary results of the community survey will be included on the next agenda. Ms. Kattreh responded affirmatively. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh stated the Countryside Park project is moving along, after a delay due to the weather. The Golf Dome project is on schedule. The next project is storm sewer and water retention. The dome is still on schedule for a November 1 opening. Pre - construction meetings for the Garden Park baseball field are starting soon. The Community Garden parking lot construction starts the week of July 29. The other big project right now is the two -year budget, which is due on July 17. X. ADJOURNMENT Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m. Ayes: Members Deeds, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Dan Peterson. Motion Carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. 7 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM JUNE 20, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Braden, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Sierks, and Spanhake. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member lyer to approve the meeting agenda. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 16, 2013 — Approved as corrected. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Spanhake to approve the revised minutes of May 16, 2013. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. Director Houle introduced new employee Mark Nolan, transportation planner. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS 541h St. W. Bridge and Roadway Reconstruction Study Director Houle stated that this project is in the Capital Improvement Plan for 2013 to complete the planning and design phase with reconstruction in 2014. The project includes reconstructing 54th St. W. from Wooddale to France Avenues; reconstructing the bridge over Minnehaha Creek; and designing a stormwater management plan to mitigate untreated stormwater runoff into the creek. Request for Proposals (RFP) for the planning and design phase were solicited. He said the difference in this project than others was that staff wanted a robust public engagement process. SEH was selected from the four RFPs that were received because they had the best public engagement process which included working with a public relations firm. Director Houle said their approach is to identify issues and needs up front and this will be done through online surveys, intercept surveys and door knocking. The intercept surveys and door knocking will be done in the area from Wooddale Avenue over to France Avenue and from 50th St. W. down to 56th St. W. The online survey can be done by anyone throughout the City. Director Houle introduced Ms. Anne Carroll from Carroll, Franck & Associates, the public relations firm working with SEH. Ms. Carroll said the RFP made it very clear that the public engagement process was central to the project and they recommended using the International Association for Public Participation framework which is nationally recognized and internationally tested. She said staff chose to use 'collaborate' from the framework to work with all stakeholders, including the ETC. Continuing, Ms. Carroll said residents were notified of the project via a letter and they started the intercept surveys this morning with a team of ten graduate students asking two key questions: 1. What issues and needs do you see on 54th St. W., including the bridge? (Please focus on needs and issues rather than specific solutions. Example: We live west of Arden Park and kids cannot walk there safely; or, the bridge isn't wide enough for cars, bikes, and walkers.) 2. What issues and needs do you see for Minnehaha Creek and Arden Park? (Please focus on issues and needs rather than specific solutions. Example: Stormwater runoff dumps directly from the road into the creek; or, the canoe landing is primitive and slippery after it rains.) Ms. Carroll said community input will be gathered as follows (input will be combined and not reported as individual or group feedback): 1. Gather issues and needs about 54th St. W., stormwater, and the creek and park — June -July 2. Gather input on design components— August 3. Gather feedback on refined scenarios —August-September The City Council public hearing will be October or November. The ETC was asked to share their input on the two issues above and on issue #1, they shared the following: • Having a place to stand to see the water (area is narrow); • Bridge is narrow; • Need to separate pedestrians, bikers and vehicles; • Stop sign is unexpected, not likely to stop when biking considering there is an oncoming hill ahead (loses momentum); • Church parking (private organization relying on public parking); • Dedicated bike lanes on both sides to build out the system and optimize the street for cycling; • Need sidewalk to improve safety and access to creek; • Grade separation so that traffic does not have go down to the level of the creek; Issue #2: • Stairway not maintained in winter, • Sidewalk on Brookview to get to the stairway; • Make it easier /safer for canoeists to cross 54th; • More parking without adding to runoff; • Make people feel safe biking and parking to reduce vehicle parking; • Aesthetics of creek — algae blooms; • Move warming house away from creek for safety, visibility; • Make Oaklawn a scenic viewing vista; • Add a trail in the park; Ms. Carroll thanked everyone for their participation and reminded them that they too, can complete the online survey if other issues came to mind. Director Houle encouraged the ETC to visit the area. Discussion • The budget is approximately $2M to be paid mostly from State Aid funds; the roadway cost split will be 80% State Aid and 20% assessed to residents. • Member Janovy said she is concerned that some phrasing in the letter sent to residents is vague enough to be misleading, e.g. "the State will pay for approximately 80 percent of the reconstruction. " She said the ETC knows what this means but its likely to be misunderstood by the general public. She encouraged rewriting the letter. She is also concerned with how authentic the engagement is going to be given competing interests (sidewalk /bike lanes /boulevard /State Aid standards). In response to the authenticity of the engagement, Director Houle said it is in the engagement process that they will determine what people's interest are. • Member lyer said he likes the idea of collaboration but is worried with the impression that a lot of public input will be part of the decision - making. He said area residents may want things that visiting residents may not want and he asked whose input will be given priority. He said he would have preferred to use "involve" from the framework because it tells residents upfront that they will be listened to but the decision - making 2 will be based on sound engineering practices and what will benefit the overall City. In response, Director Houle said the process is set up so that no one group gets preferential treatment and the series of workshops are set up to engage residents at different stages. Additionally, member lyer said there is no mention of how this project fits with the Comprehensive Plan, Safe Routes to School, etc. and suggested that these should be included. Director Houle said the draft Living Streets Policy will be implemented and it is mentioned in the tasks. Member Bass said they need to tie the pieces together (stormwater issue, multi -modal transportation, etc.) in a more overt way so that residents can make the connection. Member Janovy added that in the past, residents could refuse a sidewalk in their neighborhood because the option was there; but this project so far, has communicated that these things are non - negotiable. She asked how you invite input when there are things off the table that may be important to residents. She added further that door knocking for her would be intrusive. Member Bass said she understands that not everyone likes door knocking but it is a great opportunity to involve residents because you are meeting them where they are and they are more likely to participate in the design process. She added that this is good step and will be a growth process for them. 2013 Capital Improvement Plan and Work Plan Update Director Houle updated the ETC on their Work Plan progress. He said the 2014 Work Plan is due to the City Council in September. He recommended adding this to the August agenda for discussion. Member lyer recommended a working group to brainstorm ideas. Member Bass suggested asking City Council if there is anything that they would like the ETC to work on. Director Houle will distribute the 2013 Work Plan Update to City Council for the next scheduled work session. 2014 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Director Houle said the ETC will receive the feasibility studies in September and make recommendations to the City Council in October. He said even though the Comprehensive, Bike, and Sidewalk Plans does not include these neighborhood streets he asked if they should review them to see if sidewalks should be added because the draft Living Streets Policy specifies types of locations for sidewalks. He said if there is a chance that sidewalks will be recommended by the ETC, he would like to know this sooner rather than later so that residents can be informed and provide feedback (a neighborhood open house is scheduled for July 29). In the Bredesen Park D Neighborhood, for example, traffic volume is low but Director Houle asked if it makes sense to add a sidewalk along Tamarac Lane to connect with the future Nine Mile Creek Trail. Member lyer asked what the criteria for adding sidewalks were and Director Houle said there are no specific rules but his general rule is 500 -750 cars per day. Member Bass said since it will be too late to fully implement the draft Living Streets Policy into the 2014 neighborhoods; in the meantime, they could offer rain gardens as options to residents or use 54th St. W. to demonstrate what a Living Streets is like. She said there are elements of the policy that could be implemented. (The policy is expected to be approved this summer.) Director Houle said they have options in Bredesen Park D because all the curb and gutter will be replaced. Member La Force is concerned that there are few houses, low traffic volume and a cul -de -sac. Member lyer suggested criteria such as park, traffic, school for adding sidewalk. Member Janovy said they were lacking information to make decisions (volume counts /speed, etc.). In the Morningside B Neighborhood, chair Nelson said there are sidewalks that ends abruptly for no apparent reason or that continue on the opposite side of the road. Director Houle said they are recommending continuing the sidewalks that ends mid -way on both Alden and Scott to 42nd and on 42 "d, he asked if they are still considering only the northside to France Ave. He said they could also continue it to the border (to the west) and they could also consider including Grimes from 42nd to Inglewood to the border (petition coming for this segment). Member Janovy said she does not believe the two sidewalks (Alden and Scott) need to be continued and that more information is needed to make a decision on 42nd (to construct on one or both sides). Member Bass said if they do not complete Alden and Scott the perception could be that they are inconsistent in what they are doing which is filling in missing 3 gaps of sidewalks and it will be another 30 years before these roadways will be redone; however, she does believe that 42nd is more crucial. Birchcrest B Neighborhood has some concrete streets and staff is analyzing them to determine if they should keep the concrete or replace it with bituminous. A petition was received for a sidewalk along the Benton Ave frontage road. Also, residents have asked if they could get a sidewalk on Valley View Rd (not on Sidewalk Plan). Member Janovy said she thought the Sidewalk Plan was no longer current and the Comp Plan is so much better. After a brief discussion, member lyer motioned to make the Sidewalk Plan obsolete. Director Houle said the Sidewalk Plan is a good starting point so he would not recommend making it obsolete. The motion failed for lack of a second. In Strachauer Park B Neighborhood, the ETC recommended a sidewalk along the perimeter of the park to have a safe place to walk after parking. There are many complaints about on- street parking in this area. Bike facility was also suggested to encourage biking to the park. There is nothing unusual about the Countryside F Neighborhood. Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 5, 2013 Section D — it was noted that the ETC usually get the data for this section. Section C -2 —Chair Nelson lives in the area and he said he did not receive the survey. Both he and member Braden agreed that throughout the day there is a steady flow of traffic. Director Houle was asked what the police do if they do not issue speeding tickets until over 15 mph and he said they do smart enforcements — Engineering data helps them determine when /where to send out enforcement. Motion was made by member Braden and seconded by member Bass to forward the Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 5 to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members - None Bike Edina Task Force Received minutes of May 9, 2013. Member Janovy said they are starting the process of filling out the Bicycle Community Friendly Application and in the fall they will offer training to individuals who are interested in becoming league certified bicycle instructors. Living Streets Working Group Chair Nelson said the draft Living Streets Policy is making its way around to boards and commissions and they have all been very receptive to it. Transportation Options Working Group Chair Nelson said member Whited is having ongoing discussion with the City Council regarding the Senior Transportation Option funding. He said the City Council is working on finding funds and member Whited is working on a grant separately. Director Houle said this was well received by the City Council. . Communications Committee Member LaForce said they requested a copy of the draft France Avenue Intersections Enhancement communication plan for review and offered some recommendations. Director Houle their recommendations were received and he would follow up with them next week. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS 4 A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues - None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Bass reported that she and member Janovy met with the Edina High School Student Council (arranged by ETC student member Sierks) regarding Safe Routes to School. She said she asked the students if they had education on safe bicycling and pedestrian behavior and some said they had. She said they all knew it was illegal to ride on the sidewalk but they were conflicted because their parents will not let them ride in the street and with a lack of sidewalk, their parents are worried about their safety. She said the consultant's report will probably recommend that they revisit the no riding on sidewalk policy. Additionally, bike security was mentioned as a concern. She said there is a bike rack but it is not in a visible location and the bikes could be tampered with. She said at Richfield High or Junior High they have a best practice bike parking cage with a close loop surveillance system so students do not have to worry about their bikes. She said there are concrete things that can be included in their Safe Routes to School plan. Member Bass said Bloomington Public Health is giving out $5,000 Community Transformation Grants to assist with promotion of the Living Streets policy but she is not sure yet what promotion means. Member Janovy said there is an issue with all the school buses leaving the campus one right behind each while traffic with the right -of -way waits. She said she wrote to David White but have not gotten a response. She said she was aware that this was not the purview of the ETC but somehow they need to let the school district know that their choices are affecting others. Director Houle added that they have internal circulation issues that spill onto the roadway. He said he use to meet regularly with them and they should probably get these meetings started again. Member Janovy suggested placing signs to signify who is working on a particular project with a phone number to call with questions. She said she has seen this in Minneapolis. She also suggested -a street obstruction permit process. STAFF COMMENTS • The 2013 projects are progressing on schedule despite the weather. • Wooddale Avenue has been restriped to sharrows. • France Avenue Intersections Enhancement — bid opening is June 27; the second urban design meeting is scheduled for July 9. • The School Road sidewalk was approved by City Council. Staff went door knocking and residents were receptive to the sidewalk. Bid opening is July 9. • The Xerxes Avenue Bridge is opened. Staff is working with Bloomington and Hennepin County to move the 4- way stop sign from the south side of the Bridge to the north side because there is more traffic on this side. • MnDOT will be working on the TH494 auxiliary lane thru fall. • Crosstown, Penn Avenue and Xerxes Avenue — Penn Avenue Bridge was shutdown recently for redecking and traffic was pushed to Xerxes Avenue. To alleviate back -ups which is sometimes all the way to 56th St, staff is working with Hennepin County, Minneapolis, Richfield and MnDOT to eliminate the parking lane from Crosstown to 60th and adjust the timing on the traffic signal. Xerxes Avenue Bridge is scheduled for redecking this fall and the roadway to the north will be milled and overlaid. • The Lake Edina pathway is under construction. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE p. a F 6 Work 'w.'# of Attendance - NAME TERM•• . J F M A M J J A 3 O N D Session IVltgs % Meetings/Work Sessions Bass; Katherine 2!1%2014 1 1 1 1 40 Braden,.Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1. 1 1 `Franzen;` Nathan 2!1/2016 1 1 1 1 I er, Su a 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 Jano ` , Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 .1 1 ,100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 .`A' 1 Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1: Schwei er, Steven = student . 1 1 1 Sierks, Caroline student -1 1 1 1. 15= S arihake, Dawn. 2/1%2016 1 -` ` 1 Whited, Courtney', 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 .1. , r "k5 6 04"Al he Braemar Clubhouse is available as a banquet and rental facility. Braemar provides an experienced, professional banquet and meeting staff; a large deck overlooking the golf course; choice of D] or band, if desired; dance floor; convenient, free parking for 500 cars; and air conditioning. Braemar Golf Course Fred Richards Executive 6364 John Harris Drive Golf Course Edina, MN 55439 7640 Parklawn Ave. 952-903-5750 (main) Edina, MN 55435 952-903-5760 (Executive 612-915-6606 Course/Range) www.BraemarGolf.com BRAIAIAR BraemarGolf@EdinaMN.gov s�e www.EdinaMN.gov -i A& * Alb ONOW am 71� -" f ' F4, Nestled in Braemar Park, Edina's Braemar Golf' Course is rated among the top public golf courses. Braemar Park is 500 acres of rolling hills and scenic lakes surrounded by beautiful, untouched oak ridges. There's a feeling of seclusion amidst its urban setting, only 20 minutes from downtown Minneapolis and the Minneapolis /St. Paul International Airport. Braemar features 27 regulation holes, two 9 -hole executive courses, a pro shop, driving range, practice pi green, indoor golf dome, banquet and meeting rooms and other amenities. Braemar also offers golf lessons, rules and etiquette clinics and leagues. liD loam At Braemar's popular ran golfers have the option o hitting off natural grass or synthetic mats. Golfers aim at various target greens spread throughout the range. The adjacent large putting green is also available to all. In addition, Braemar features a short game area with multiple greens and a practice bunker. ® n c� emca. t I �ec�KaCa( iam. 27-M, C,,:. 0 -7 - Hays Twenty -seven holes await the 19-27- ClInte golfer at Braemar! The course features long, difficult front nine; a shorter, somewhat easier back nine and a scenic new nine where golfers are rewarded for their accuracy. The course combines bunkers, water and large undulating greens to make it a fun and challenging course for all golfers. Bu,,,, �, Fxeo,,, Cow� ie Braemar Executive Course is a Par 29 with its longest pole measuring 326 yards and the shortest measuring 110 yards. With its rolling greens, various water hazards and sand bunkers, it is both fun and challenging for golfers of all abilities. F,v-,d, Uo,� Exec CaT C Located in southeast Edina near the greater Southdale area, Fred Richards Executive Course is a Par 29 course complete with clubhouse and putting green. Managed by Braemar Golf Course, this executive course offers the golfer an opportunity to decide between two different flagstick positions on each hole. This concept allows the beginning golfer a chance to take an easier approach to the hole while a more challenging route can be taken by the more experienced golfer. Both routes are rated for handicap purposes. M e Pa,tIt", Ca„l. Golfers can enjoy advanced reservation privileges and reduced green fees by purchasing patron cards for the regulation or executive courses. Resident patron card holders who are 75 and older receive a "super- senior" rate Monday through Thursday until 1 p.m. i Buy One, Play Three Anytime Tuesday and Wednesday and after 1 p.m. Sunday, Patron Card and Tour Card holders receive { the Preferred Rate for 18 or 9 holes at Braemar and two other metro area courses - Baker National Golf Course and Brookview Golf Course. No other benefits transfer. �7i r c \ 1 r � ..,