Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013-09-17_COUNCIL MEETING
REVISE AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER IL ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members -present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of September 3, 2013 and Work Session of September 3, 2013 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 09/05/13, TOTAL $742,793.08; and Pre -List Dated, 09/12/2013, TOTAL $1,974,013.51 C. Resolution No. 2013 -75 Setting the Hearing Dates for Special Assessments & Utility Certification (10/14/2013) D. Request For Purchase — 2012 12 Ft. Ford Box Truck — Edina Liquor Stores E. Resolution No. 2013 -78 Lot Division — 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive/Interlachen Country Club, Michael Gorman F. Request For Purchase — Replacement of West Arena Low E Ceiling — Braemar Arena V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Agenda/Edina City Council September 17, 2013 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PUBLIC HEARING — Resolution No. 2013 -77. Silver Oak Development On Behalf Of The IRET Properties; Site Plan Review With A Parking Ramp Setback And Parking Stall Variance At 6525 -45 France Avenue (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2013 -79 & Resolution No. 2013 -80 Awarding Sale of G.O. Bonds Series 2013A & 2013B B. Sketch Plan Review — 6725 York Avenue (Wick's site) and five single family homes on Xerxes Avenue to the east of 6725 York. C. Second Reading — Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding the R- I & R -2 Zoning District requirements; Ordinance No.-2013 - 09 D. Resolution No. 2013 -76 Accepting Various Donations -, t. Kesolution No. LU 13 -U I tminent Uomain Acquisition Ut t'roperty Located At JY44 West �749'V2 Street IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Park Board, August 13, 2013 2. Heritage Preservation Board, August 13, 2013 3. Planning Commission, August 28, 2013 4. Transportation Commission, July 18; 2013 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X111. ADJOURNMENT Agenda/Edina City Council September 17, 2013 Page 3 EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Meeting of September 3, 2013 V. PUBLIC HEARING — Eminent Domain Acquisition Of Property Located At 3944 West 49 ''A Street. Resolution No. 2013- 13(Favorable vote of majority of HRA Commissioners to approve) VI. Resolution No. 2013 -14 Authorizing Redemption of Series 2009B Bonds VII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. r= SCHEDULE OF'UPCOMINGs'MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Sep 17 Closed Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 17 Work Session —joint Meeting with HPB 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct I Work Session — Boards & Commissions 2014 Work Plan Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct I Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Oct 14 Work Session — Business Meeting/Utility Rate Study 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Oct 14 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov 4 Work Session — Human Services Task Force 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Nov 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov I I VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Nov 19 Work Session — Final Budget Review /Finalize 2014Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Nov 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 28 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 29 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Dec 2 Work Session —joint Meeting With Edina Housing Foundation 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM SWLRT Housing Corridor Report Tue Dec 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Ties Dec 10 Special Meeting - Public Improvement Hearings 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS :s Dec 17 Work Session —TBD ,es Dec 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed at Noon Wed Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Tues Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed at Noon Wed Jan 1 NEW YEAR'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland_ Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item IV.I, Resolution No 2013 -69, Denying A Preliminary Plat With Lot Width And Lot Area Variances, Ron Helm on Behalf of Tom And Gretchen Shanight, 5612 Tracy Avenue, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular, closed session, and work session meeting minutes of August 20, 2013. IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 22, 2013, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $124,054.89; Police Special Revenue $104.93; Working Capital Fund $852,389.48; Art Center Fund $6,215.87; Aquatic Center Fund $13,279.52; Golf Course Fund $31,140.58; Ice Arena Fund $5,825.60; Edinborough Park Fund $29,881.61; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $11,366.79; Liquor Fund $255,231.11; Utility Fund $530,772.06; Storm Sewer Fund $340,021.33; PSTF Agency Fund $7,372.10; Centennial TIF District $8,800.00; Payroll Fund $2,443.24; TOTAL $2,218,899.05 and for receipt of payment of claims dated August 29, 2013, and consisting of 35 pages; General Fund $424,785.39; Police Special Revenue $424,78539; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $3,034.35; Working Capital Fund $2,978.30; Equipment Replacement Fund $50,504.77; Art Center Fund $2,794.27; Aquatic Center Fund $7,750.19; Golf Course Fund $11,732.80; Ice Arena Fund $11,496.41; Edinborough Park Fund $14,288.66; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $8,765.03; Liquor Fund $208,052,59; Utility Fund $53,909.21; Storm Sewer Fund $11,200.91; Recycling Fund $14:76; PSTF Agency Fund $297.33; Centennial TIF District $3,535.00; Payroll Fund $5,549.68; TOTAL $821,250.88. IV.C. Request for Purchase — Countryside Park Hockey Lighting, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Musco Lighting, US- Communities Electrical Contract MA- IS1340234 -4, at $34,449.00. IV.D. Request for Purchase — Aquatic Center Hot Water heater, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Yale Mechanical (Option 2), at $45,300. IV.E. Approve 2013 4014 Union Contract For Minnesota Public Employees Association: 911 Dispatchers. IV.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -68, Authorizing Donation of Used Tactical SWAT Vests To Hennepin County Ambulance. IV.G. Set 2014 Budget And Levy Public Hearing And Budget And Levy Adoption Meeting. IV.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -73 & Resolution No. 2013 -74, Providing For Sale of G.O. Bonds Series 2013A & 2013B. And 'at Area VaFianees, IV.J. Approve Agreement To Provide Dispatch Services And Emergency Communications For The City of Richfield. IVX Adopt Motion Not To WaiveZ# Statutory Tort Limits For League Of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. IV.L. Authorize Removal Of Existing Parking Bay At 421 Blake Road. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 3, 2013 0 IV.M. Request for Purchase — Emergency Repair Well No. 13, 6721 Second Street, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner & Sons, at $ 75,000.00 (estimate). Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.1. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-69, DENYING A PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH LOT WIDTH AND LOT AREA VARIANCES, RON HELM ON BEHALF OF TOM AND GRETCHEN SHANIGHT, 5612 TRACY AVENUE — REFERRED The Council discussed whether or not to table the preliminary plat allowing the applicant to propose an alternate alignment. City Attorney Knutson provided information stating procedurally, the action taken at the August 20, 2013 City Council meeting had been to direct staff to prepare findings denying the requested preliminary plat. He stated the City Council's options for action included: to refer the preliminary plat back to the Planning Commission, to act on the findings that were prepared, or to table the preliminary plat to a date ,specific. 'Mr. Knutson recommended the applicant be requested to sign a waiver from the statutory deadline for action, if the preliminary plat were to be referred to the Planning Commission. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, referring the preliminary plat with lot width and lot area variances requested by Ron Helm on behalf of Tom and Gretchen Shanight, 5612 Tracy Avenue,,to the Planning Commission, conditioned on a waiver being signed by the applicant extending the required date for action to December 17, 2013, and directing staff to re- notify the neighbors. Ayes: Bennett, Bindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland. Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Manager Neal and the Council recognized Fire.Chief Scheerer for his service to the City, noting his upcoming retirement. Mr. Sch,eerer stated his appreciation for the support of the City Council, staff, and community during his employment. V.A. CONSTITUTION WEEK— PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read. in full the Constitution Week Proclamation, declaring the week of September 17 -23 as Constitution Week. Member, .Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the proclamation declaring the week of September, 17 -23 as Constitution Week in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Sarah Patzloff accepted the Constitution Week Proclamation on behalf of the Monument Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution. V. B. IMAGES OF EDINA PHOTO CONTEST PRESENTATION— PRESENTED Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented the photographs and winners of the 2013 Images of Edina Contest, with awards presented by Mayor Hovland. V. C. SEPTEMBER 2013 SPINAL CORD INJURY AWARENESS MONTH — PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full the Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month Proclamation, declaring September 2013 as Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month. Motion made and seconded unanimously by the City Council adopting the proclamation declaring September 2013 as Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Rebecca Panser thanked the Council for acknowledging September as disability awareness month. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 3, 2013 VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. Vll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VILA. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -71 ADOPTING PRELIMINARY 2014 TAX LEVY AND OPERATING BUDGET - ADOPTED Mr. Neal explained the preliminary tax levy was the basis for tax notices distributed to property owners in November. He noted the maximum levy could be lowered at the time of final adoption, but could not be raised. Mr. Neal recommended that the Council adopt the preliminary levy at the total tax capacity levy of $26,845,355 / total tax levy of $27,473,155. Finance Director. Wallin informed the Council that while a 3% general fund levy increase had been proposed, the calculation of the debt levy would actually lower the overall levy increase to approximately 271 %. Mr. Wallin reviewed the schedule for the hearing and adoption meetings in December. Mr. Neal noted that the impact of the proposed levy on a median valued home for 2014 would be approximately $24 per year. He said the 2014 levy increase would allow licenses for city technology to be brought up to date, would cover increased health care costs; adding there was no increased staffing level anticipated. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -71, Adopting Preliminary 2014 Tax Levy And Operating Budget. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -70 ADOPTING THE FINAL AUAR, ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW — UPDATE FOR PENTAGON PARK — ADOPTED Community Development Director Teague informed the Council that the City had responded to comments made by the Metropolitan Council, MnDot, and Hennepin County Public Works on the Final AUAR Update for Pentagon Park. The Final AUAR Update was being presented to the Council for adoption. Chuck Rickart, WSB & Associates, summarized the Final AUAR Update for Pentagon Park and comments received from the Metropolitan Council, MnDOT and Hennepin County Public Works. Mr. Rickart and Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to agency comments on noise mitigation, traffic impacts, traffic levels, and ordinance standards as they pertained to construction times and operation. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -70, Adopting the Final AUAR, Alternative Urban Areawide Review — Update for Pentagon Park. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2013-72 ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS —ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -72 accepting various donations. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VILD. PROCESS FOR COMMUNITY SPACE PROGRAMMING RELATED TO REDEVELOPMENT OF 5146 EDEN AVENUE —DIRECTION GIVEN Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 3, 2013 Mr. Neal stated there was discussion at the last Council meeting about the need to collect information and make a decision on the use of the community space in the Grandview Redevelopment prior to the Request for Information (RFI) process. He said there was interest from some members of the Grandview Citizen Advisory Team (CAT) to receive further direction from the Council. Mr. Neal reviewed the following Grandview CAT process options: 1) Creating a redevelopment catalyst for the Grandview Area; 2) Inventorying,and Identifying community recreation needs through Needs Assessment Task Force (additional eight to twelve months); and, 3) Inventorying and identifying community recreation needs through hired consultant (additional three to four months). Mr. Neal suggested a fourth option to proceed with the redevelopment process using community space as green -space until a compelling community need surfaced and more defined financial resources were available. The Council discussion included: the guiding principles of the Grandview Redevelopment Framework, the possibility of a community needs assessment including a community survey to be conducted by Decision Resources and a current infrastructure analysis, potential timelines each aspect's impact while keeping the process moving forward. Council consensus was to authorize staff to proceed with a community survey tightly focused on possible site uses, with the resultant information conveyed to the CAT to be used in the RFI process. The CAT was asked to review and comment on the survey results and to also review the RFIs, with a recommendation forwarded to the Council. The RFI presentation would include a public notification process, with a deadline of January 1, 2014, for RFI submittals. The Council asked to be notified should an adjustment be needed to the timeline. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. MINUTES: 1. VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE, JUNE 21, 2013 2. PLANNING COMMISSION, AUGUST 14, 2013 3. ARTS & CULTURE COMMISSION, JULY 25, 2013 4. HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION, JULY 23, 2013 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 17, 2013. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the September 3, 2013, meeting available. Page 4 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 S:OS P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. ROLL. CALL Answering roll call were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting included: Annie Johnson, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Director; and Cary Teague, Planning Director. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to receive presentations on the Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Room expansion and the Pentagon Park Redevelopment Update. FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM EXPANSION Larry Laukka, Fairview Southdale Hospital Campaign Committee Chair, introduced the team which included: Fred Richards, Campaign Committee; Brad Beard, President, Fairview Southdale Hospital, Robb Gruman, Vice President of Facilities and Support Services, Fairview Southdale Hospital; and Tina Hoye, John Tietz and Russ Nelson of Nelson, Tietz & Hoye. Mr. Laukka made a presentation to the City Council detailing the planned Fairview Southdale Hospital Emergency Center expansion. He detailed the phases of the expansion and requested assistance from the City. The Council and Fairview Team discussed the various aspects of the hospital expansion and potential impacts on the Edina community as well as the opportunities and obstacles the City faced in participating in the expansion. Following the discussion, the Council asked staff to investigate any possible avenues available to the City to assist in the project. PENTAGON PARK RED_ EVELOPMENT UPDATE Joining .the meeting were Planning Commissioners: Chair Kevin Staunton and Commissioners Michael Schroeder, Arlene Forrest, Ken Potts, and Mike Fischer. Representing Hillcrest Development were: Scott Tankenoff, Charlie Nestor, Hillcrest Development; Jim Nelson; Eberhardt Advisory, LLC; Bob Close, Bob Close and Associates; and Tom Whitlock, President of Damon Farber and Associates; ,and Brad Schaeffer and Mark Rauenhorst. Mr. Close and Mr. Whitlock made a presentation updating the City Council on the redevelopment of Pentagon Park. They outlined what had been done to date to stabilize the property and reviewed various possible scenarios for future redevelopment. The Council asked questions of the team and discussed the proposed redevelopment with staff and the Planning Commission. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 17, 2013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 9/5/2013 - 9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 374943 91512013 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 153.90 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 323262 021039646 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 153.90 374944 9/512013 116531 ABLE SPRINKLER 366.30 SPRINKLER REPAIRS 322979 13016 01398.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINA B 366.30 374945 915/2013 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 14,821.43 FIBERGLASS TRUCK BODY 00005812 322980 0137150 -IN 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 14, 821.43 374946 91512013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 104.40 323111 1714336 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 71.60 323112 6612414026 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 127.60 323349 082913 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 303.60 374947 9/5/2013 129458 ACME TOOLS 37.38 SAW BLADES 00001851 323064 2115739 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 37.38 374948 916/2013 122055 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC. 128.25 DECALS 00003664 323063 188385 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 128.25 374949 91512013 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 196.49 CARBON DIOXIDE LIQUID 323263 31111977 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 196.49 374950 915/2013 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 32.71 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 322981 123486 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY 330.67 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 322982 123485 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 32.71 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 322983 123484 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 88.53 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 323143 123488 5430.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 484.62 374951 91512013 102715 ALLEGRA EDINA 60.56 ADDRESS SIGNAGE 323264 99605 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 267.62 MARRIOTT PASSES 323265 100173 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 328.18 R55CKREG LOG20000 1,886.00 CITY OF EDINA 374957 91512013 119465 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNT Council Check Register 50.00 WEBSITE JOB POSTING 323333 9/5/2013 —9/5/2013 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374952 9/5/2013 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON 1 100665 AMSAN 170.95 ALTERNATOR 00005417 323146 175.73 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 323266 294316112 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.29 SANITIZER WIPES 00001820 323267 294606546 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 132654 BARCODESINC 205.02 524.62 PRINTER FOR EVIDENCE ROOM 322984 374953 91512013 DATA PROCESSING 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 524.62 1,062.66 COPIER PAPER 323332 10371824 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,062.66 73.16 BATTERIES 323066 018 - 311918 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 374954 9/5/2013 73.16 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 374961 9/5/2013 6,317.00 COMMERCIAL PACKAGE POLICY 323062 6100000146577 1550.6200 INSURANCE 6,317.00 374955 915/2013 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 70.00 SAUSAGE BRATWURST 323144 1980222 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 990.83 FOOD 323145 1979891 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,060.83 374956 9/512013 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Page- 2 BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GRILL GRILL 900.00 323113 26364 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 986.00 323350 26365 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT, GENERAL STREET RENOVATION 184.47 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 323067 082713 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 184.47 1,886.00 374957 91512013 119465 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNT 50.00 WEBSITE JOB POSTING 323333 36909 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 50.00 374958 915/2013 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON 1 170.95 ALTERNATOR 00005417 323146 153891 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 170.95 374959 91512013 132654 BARCODESINC 524.62 PRINTER FOR EVIDENCE ROOM 322984 574526 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 524.62 374960 9/512013 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 73.16 BATTERIES 323066 018 - 311918 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 73.16 374961 9/5/2013 120517 BEITEL, DAWN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT, GENERAL STREET RENOVATION 184.47 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 323067 082713 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 184.47 374966 91512013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 3,305.50 SPECIAL INSPECTIONSITESTING 2,159.50 INSPECTIONSITESTING SERVICES 1,140.00 INSPECTIONS/TESTING SERVICES 6,605.00 374967 91512013 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 204.05 HOMETOWN HEROES PHOTOS 283.17 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 309.99 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 30.00 CITY SLICK PHOTOS 30.00 EMPLOYEE PORTRAITS 134.53 HOMETOWN HEROES PHOTOS 338.84 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 1,545.67 Council Check Register 9/5/2013 -9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 374962 91512013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 200.05 323351 79564400 5862.5512 73.10 323384 79564500 5822.5515 179.78 323385 88982200 5842.5515 41.00 323386 79564000 5842.5515 398.55 323387 79564100 5842.5512 892.48 374963 91512013 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING 1,950.00 INSTALL SEWER AND WATERLINE 00001090 299517 A94332 05525.1705.21 5,175.00 INSTALL SEWER AND WATERLINE 00001090 299517 A94332 03471.1705.21 7,125.00 374964 91512013 125139 BERNICK'S 619.15 323210 80407 5842.5514 364.05 323352 80408 5862.5514 983.20 374965 91612013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 23.96 RECEIPT BOOKS 00003004 322985 WO- 873581 -1 1400.6513 8.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003004 322986 WO- 873583 -1 1400.6513 97.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 322987 ' WO- 873883 -1 1400.6513 99.11 LABELS, ADHESIVE NOTES 00009283 323068 WO- 873509 -1 5110.6513 228.77 374966 91512013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 3,305.50 SPECIAL INSPECTIONSITESTING 2,159.50 INSPECTIONSITESTING SERVICES 1,140.00 INSPECTIONS/TESTING SERVICES 6,605.00 374967 91512013 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 204.05 HOMETOWN HEROES PHOTOS 283.17 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 215.09 HOMETOWN HEROES PHOTOS 309.99 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 30.00 CITY SLICK PHOTOS 30.00 EMPLOYEE PORTRAITS 134.53 HOMETOWN HEROES PHOTOS 338.84 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 1,545.67 323334 373609 323401 371176 323402 372737 323335 1176 323335 1176 323336 1178 323336 1178 323337 1179 323337 1179 323337 1179 323337 1179 5200.1727 47078.6710 47078.6710 1130.6124 1130.6123 1130.6124 1130.6123 1130.6408 1130.6408 1130.6124 1130.6123 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF DOME EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 914/26 . 13:15:31 Page - 3 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATH COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATH WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 323114. 346925. CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,548.45 323115 346923 Council Check Register YORK SELLING 69.70 323116 346927 5822.5515 9/5/2013 - 9/5/2013 209.50 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 374968 9/5/2013 5822.5514 111706 BREDEMUS HARDWARE CO. 50TH ST SELLING 4,842.25 2,490.33 CLOSER ARMS, ARMOR PLATES 323268 209966 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,490.33 319.50 323117 96540 5842.5513 374969 91512013 97.50 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 323388 96549 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 417.00 811.18 NEWSLETTER 322988 32091 1628.6575 PRINTING 374976 9/512013 129923 CAWLEY 611.18 15.78 374970 915/2013 V178127 122074 BUIE, BARB PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 31.38 NAME BADGES 322991 V178352 8.89 PETTY-CASH 323065 082613 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 98.50 PETTY CASH 323065 082613 .5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 107.39 374971 91512013 132666 BURNS EXCAVATING INC. 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW -6905 VALLEY VIEW 323329 122477 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 374972 91512013 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 757.98 EDINA MAPS FRAMING 322989 MAPS 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 757.98 374973 91512013 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 67.94 OCE MAINTENANCE 323069 ',!988058085 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 67.94 374974 9/5/2013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Page- 4 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE INSPECTIONS ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING 99.40 323114. 346925. 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,548.45 323115 346923 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 69.70 323116 346927 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 209.50 323389 021633 - .5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 915.20 323390 346926 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,842.25 374975 915/2013 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 319.50 323117 96540 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 97.50 323388 96549 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 417.00 374976 9/512013 129923 CAWLEY 15.78 SENIOR CENTER NAME TAGS 322990 V178127 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 31.38 NAME BADGES 322991 V178352 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 374977 91512013 374978 91512013 374979 91512013 374980 91512013 374981 91512013 374982 915/2013 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/5/2013 - 9/5/2013 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9/4120w 13:15:31 Page - 5 47.16 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 148.20 323121 15.98 3924 W 49 -112 ST 322992 9941021 -8/13 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 29.60 9322 W 49 -1/2 ST 322993 9941026 -8/13 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 28.97 3928 W 49 -1/2 ST 322994 9941020 -8/13 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 15.98 3930 W 49 -1/2 ST 322995 9941012 -8/13 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 381.95 9724639 -1 322996 9724639 -8/13 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 17.90 5596524 -8 322997 5596524 -8/13 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 198.20 8034001 -1 322998 8034001 -8/13 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 573.51 5546504 -1 322999 5546504 -8/13 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,637.10 5591458 -4 323000 5591458 -8/13 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 21.33 9546705 -6 323070 9546705 -8/13 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 240.01 5584304 -9 323269 5584304 -8113 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 15.92 5584310 -6 323270 5584310 -8/13 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 15.92 5590919 -6 323271 5590919 -8/13 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 3,192.37 . 123898 CENTURYLINK 58.51 952 920 -1586 323001 1566 -8113 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 67.49 952 922 -2444 323002 2444 -8/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 57.23 952 920 -8632 323071 8632 -8/13 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 123.53 952 831 -0024 323109 0024 -8/13 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 306.76 122084 CITY OF EDINA -UTILITIES 795.93 00113607- 0342163045 323072 342163045 -8/13 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 044 21 00086676- 0330288022 323272 330288022 -8/13 5310.6189 SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION 1, 1,840.14 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 148.20 323121 0198020221 298.00 323211 0108435433 446.20 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 892.18 SEPT 2013 SERVICES 323003 090113 892.18 120433 COMCAST 6.80 8772 10 614 0373022 323004 373022 -8/13 119.09 323073 396908 -8/13 5862.5515 5642.5515 5841.6103 1400.6103 5760.6230 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 716212 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 92.80 Council Check Register 716213 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 41.60 9/5/2013 -9/5/2013 716210 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 125.89 66.30 323354 716208 374983 9/512013 VERNON SELLING 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 323355 716209 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 535.10 ASPHALT 323147 130815 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 28,570.93 ASPHALT 323147 130815 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 29,106.03 374989 91512013 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 374984 91512013 17.63 102596 CROWN TROPHY 00005522 323273 4- 144218 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 148.88 ENGRAVING 00009272 323074 1194 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 148.88 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 374985 9/512013 16.86 132665 CUSTOM RENOVATIONS 323150 821880 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT.OPERATION GEN 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW -6336 MILDRED AVE 323327 122756 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -6304 BROOKVIEW 323328 083113 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 5,000.00 374986 9/5/2013 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 46,038.78 SCADA RADIO SYSTEM UPGRADE 00001863 323110 10362, 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,800.80 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 323148 10380 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 49,839.58 374987 915/2013 104020 DALCO 21.46 HEAVY DUTY LUBRICANT 00005458 323149 2644323 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 21.46 374988 9/512013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 9/4/2013 13:15.31 Page- 6 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,136.25 323118 716212 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 92.80 323119 716213 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 41.60 323120 716210 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 369.60 323353 716753 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 66.30 323354 716208 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,302.20 323355 716209 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,019.85 323391 716211 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8,028.60 374989 91512013 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 17.63 REMOTE CASE 00005522 323273 4- 144218 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.63 - 374990 915/2013 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 16.86 SCREWDRIVERS 323150 821880 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT.OPERATION GEN 1.46 SOCKET 00005415 323151 826732 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9/4/21,,_ 13:15:31 Page - 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL GRILL GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS INSPECTIONS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT GENERAL STORM SEWER CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/5/2013 -9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287.21 THERMOMETERS, WRENCH 00005415 323152 826722 1553.6556 TOOLS 67.69 BPC FRAC COM 00001825 323274 826547 1646.6556 TOOLS 373.22 374991 91512013 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 60.79 BAKERY 323153 470493 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 323154 470494 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 91.39 323155 471033 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 79.10 231.28 374992 91512013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 323075 650243624 -8113 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 89.00 89.00 374993 91512013 101766 DISPLAY SALES 172.71 FLAGS 323005 INVO091735 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 172.71 374994 91512013 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW -6037 KELLOGG AVE 323331 122071 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 374995 91512013 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 37.19 HUBS 00001804 323156 10189200 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.44 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001801 323275 10183400 1646.6578 LAMPS &'FIXTURES 42.63 374996 91512013 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 324.61 PHOTO CONTEST PLAQUES 323006 89988 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 324.61 374997 91512013 132658 EHS THESPIAN BOOSTERS 10.51 PARK SHELTER REFUND 323076 ROSLAND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 144.49 PARK SHELTER REFUND 323076 ROSLAND 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL 155.00 374998 915/2013 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 5,186.77 PUMP REPAIR 00001740 323077 0050704 -IN 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5,186.77 374999 91512013 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 4,456.69 CASTINGS 00001252 323007 SS4642 5932.6536 CASTINGS 9/4/21,,_ 13:15:31 Page - 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL GRILL GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS INSPECTIONS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/5/2013 -9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 4,456.69 375000 9/512013 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 449.16 TERMINALS, CONNECTORS 00005381 323078 200047 1553.6530 449.16 376001 9/512013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 133.89 FVP 323008 1- 4245808 1553.6530 133.89 FVP 323157 1- 4251114 1553.6530 43.85 WATER PUMP 323158 69- 111096 1553.6530 218.19 FAN CLUTCH, FAN BLADE 323159 69- 111073 1553.6530 529.82 375002 91612013 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 11.54 T2- 327777 PHOTO 323338 8326063 1130.6408 11.54 375003 9/5/2013 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 9.38 BOLTS 00001808 323079 MNTC2119298 1322.6406 5.58 BRIDGE BOLTS 00006225 323160 MNTC2119054 5422.6406 14.47 NUT FOR ZIP LINE 00001677 323276 MNTC2118900 5311.6406 29.43 376004 9/512013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS. 1,546.55 CS PARTS 00001741 323009 0042345 5913.6406 1,846.41 METERS 00001745 323010 0042743 ' 5917.6530 1,322.26 METERS' 00001745 323011 0040227 -1 5917.6530 1,114.92 _ METER COUPLINGS 00001742 323012 0042749 5917.6530 1,428.47 METERS 00001745 323080 0043808 5917.6530 745.30 METERS 00001745 323081 0044330 5917.6530 8,003.91 375005 91512013 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC. 25.33 BOLTS, WASHERS 00005519 323082 62743 .1470.6530 25.33 375006 91512013 121386 FLINT HILLS RESOURCES LP 16,694.77 CRS -2P 323161 14877245 -0 1314.6519 14,444.67 CRS -2P 323162 14899789 -0 1314.6519 31,139.44 375007 91512013 121634 FORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Page- 8 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ROAD OIL ROAD OIL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION 914/20,. 3:15:31 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Page _ 9 Council Check Register 915/2013 — 915/2013 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Check # Date 323013 133485 1400.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,154.25 THERMAL ROLLS 1,154.25 375008 9/512013 132664 FRANEK INC. 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW -5213 DUNDEE RD 323326 123186 2,500.00 375009 91612013 103039 FREY, MICHAEL GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 53.39 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 323141 082913 5110.6406 53.39 375010 91512013 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 3,938.06 WADING POOL BOILER REPAIR 323277 118170 5311.6180 3,938.06 375011 91512013 101103 GRAINGER 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 44.71 BURN SPRAY, BURN JEL, WIPES 00005457 323083 9221845796 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.71 BURN SPRAY, BURN JEL, WIPES 00005457 323083 9221845796 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.72 BURN SPRAY, BURN JEL, WIPES 00005457 323083 9221845796 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 274.97 MARKING PAINT 00001749 323163 9226134915 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 323278 9223026460 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 113.72 EAR PLUGS 00001837 323279 9225262345 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.58 WASP /HORNET SPRAY 570.41 375012 91512013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,271.00 323122 156286 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 48.00- 323356 156379 5862.5513 5,223.00 375013 91512013 121536 GRAY MATTER CREATIVE LLC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 2,150.00 FALL ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 323014 13153 1130.6103 2,150.00 375014 91512013 128230 GREENLEE, JORDON GENERAL SUPPLIES OLD COMMUNICATIONS 32.17 CD /DVD BINDER 255418 020311 2210.6406 32.17 375015 9/512013 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 5410.6132 PROFESSIONALSVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 3,380.00 GOLFLESSONS 323164 082913 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5,168.00 GOLF LESSONS 323164 082913 5410.6132 8,548.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Council Check Register Page - 10 9/5/2013 —9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description _ Business Unit 375016 9/512013 130146 H2 GOLF COMPANY LLC 12.90 TEES 323165 8244 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 12.90 375017 9/5/2013 132660 HANSON, MARLENE 85.00 PATRON CARD REFUND 323168 082813 5401.4531 MEMBERSHIPS GOLF REVENUES 85.00 375018 9/512013 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,605.76 SEPT 2013 PREMIUM 323166 6437665 -0 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,605.76 375019 9/5/2013 100797 HAWKINS INC. 6,371.20 CHEMICALS 00001250, 323015 3504179 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,570.05 CHEMICALS 00001250 323084 3505592 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,446.87 CHLORINE, SODIUM HYDROXIDE 323280 3503005 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 11,388.12 375020 91512013 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 323167 024731 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 375021 9/512013 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 1,369.83 WORK STATIONS 323339 524671 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1,369.83 375022 9/5/2013 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 179.27 PORCELAIN CLEANER, CSP CLEAN®H002203. 323281 600825576 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 179.27 375023 91512013 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 87.62 PAINT 00002200 323282 03071050 5720.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 87.62 375024 915/2013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,690.00 323123 663797 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,567.50 323357 663466 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,257.50 375025 91512013 129547 HOLTZ GARDEN CENTER 860.32 IRRIGATION SERVICE 323085 26519. 05503.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -503 W70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 860.32 .- 9/4/2 .3:15:31 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Page - 11 Council Check Register 9/5/2013 --9/5/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 375026 9/512013 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 293.80 SODIUM HYDROSULFITE 323283 13080628 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 414.51 STAIN INHIBITOR, TABLETS 00002196 323284 13081507 5720.6545 CHEMICALS 708.31 375027 91512013 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 846.26 BIRTHDAY PARTY BROCHURES 323285 32488 5710.6575 PRINTING 846.26 375028 91512013 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 213.18 CONCESSION PRODUCT 323286 2237984 5320.5510 213.18 375029 915/2013 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 3,516.92 MAIL WATER BILLS 323016 80651 5910.6103 3,516.92 375030 91512011 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 323358 13942 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 450.00 450.00 375031 91512013 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 49.80 PVC PIPE 00001829 323287 792877 1643.6103 90.21 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001830 323288 793182 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 140.01 375032 91512013 132663 J.S. STEWART CO. CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW -5613 ABBOTT 323324 123274 1495.4109 2,500.00 375033 91512013 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 CONSULTING FEES 323340 #4 200.00 375034 9/512013 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 15.21 323086 082613 1551.6406 323086 082813 5430.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 16.12 323086 082813 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 21.77 323086 082813 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 28.92 323086 082813 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 37.58 323086 082813 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 39.31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 63.57 65.23 74.77 76.25 76.73 76.91 120.51 133.88 185.61 245.91 259.13 298.95 309.86 339.97 451.01 1,274.93 4,212.13 375035 9/5/2013 375036 91512013 102146 JESSEN PRESS 106.88 LETTERHEAD 106.88 323341 38907 1550.6406 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 52.56 TOILET SERVICE 323289 67882 1645.6182 52.56 Subledger Account Description COURSE BEAUTIFICATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Page - 12 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TREES & MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LITTER REMOVAL 375037 9/512013 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 915/2013 -9/5/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323086 082813 5422.6275 323086 082813 1322.6406 323086 082813 1553.6406 323086 082813 5311.6406 323086 082813 5422.6406 323086 082813 5431.6406 323086 082813 1553.6530 323086 082813 1552.6406 323086 082813 4090.6406 323086 082813 1470.6406 323086 082813 1644.6556 323086 082813 5761.6406 323086 082813 5720.6406 323086 082813 1301.6406 323086 082813 .5913.6406 323086 082813 1646.6406 323341 38907 1550.6406 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 52.56 TOILET SERVICE 323289 67882 1645.6182 52.56 Subledger Account Description COURSE BEAUTIFICATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVAL 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Page - 12 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TREES & MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LITTER REMOVAL 375037 9/512013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,156.60 323124 2119637 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 15.00 323125 2119674 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,428.40 323126 2119673 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 403.60 323212 2124149 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 21.00 323213 2119690 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,999.25 323214 2119688 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 93.16- 323215 2119687 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,683.50 323359 2119669 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 21,614.19 375038 9/5/2013 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW -5024 HANKERSON 323330 121343 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 375039 915/2013 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 9/4/2013 13:15:31 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Page - 13 Council Check Register 9/5/2013 -9/5/2013 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Check # 323169 65731051 5431.6545 CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 137.40 HERBICIDE . 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 101.69 COUPLINGS 00006477 323170 65732280 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 16.61 INSERTS 00006484 323171 65822199 5422.6611 00002028 323342 65758189 5761.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 18.47 OIL 274.17 375041 915/2013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 323216 1656417 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,706.98 323217 1656427 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 570.37 323218 1656422 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 422.15 323219 1656418 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 51.12 323220 1656416 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,956.79 323221 1656398 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 323222 589097 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.38- 323223 589094 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 17.25- 323224 589096 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 12.50- 323225 589092 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.39- 323360 1656413 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 646.39 323361 1656415 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,494.02 323362 1656411 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,484.70 323363 1656412 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.99 323364 1656397 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.68 323365 1656414 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,073.45 323366 1656425 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,560.29 323367 1656426 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.99 323368 1656420 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,846.65 323369 1656419 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,504.23 323370 1656421 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,958.84 323371 1.656424 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 59.99 323392 1656404 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,207.15 27,549.36 375042 91512013 132668 JOHNSON, ANNIE 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 61.98 REIMBURSEMENT 323381 082913 73.85 REIMBURSEMENT 323381 082913 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 135.83 375043 91512013 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 13.48 LINSET TP, FOAM TAPE 323017 009756 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 13.48 375044 9/5/2013 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/5/2013 —9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 666.64 FLANGES, BEARINGS 00005405 323172 0990385 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 666.64 375045 9/5/2013 131439 KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL LLP 7,165.89 FLIGHT TRACK CHANGES MSP 323290 14547 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 7,165.89 375046 91512013 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 2,444.00 DNR PERMIT FEE 323343 107925 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 2,444.00 375047 9/5/2013 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 13,812.19 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 323344 090613 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 13,812.19 375048 915/2013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 562.74 TY -RAP, CAPSCREWS, DRILL BITS 00005455 323087 9301857380 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32.92 CAP SCREWS 00005516 323173 9301863252 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 448.11 SCREWS, WASHERS, ADAPTERS 00005459 323291 9301872016 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,043.77 375049 9/5/2013 132661 LOBELL, MS. ROBBIE 637.00 WORKSHOP 323142 082913 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 637.00 375050 9/512013 101792 LUBE -TECH 95.00 USED OIL PICK -UP 323174 2255870 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.00 375051 91512013 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 1,698.80 SWEEPER BROOMS 323088 9292 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 3,337.50 MILLING BITS 323089 .9294 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 5,036.30 , 375052 915/2013 132657 MAGERS & QUINN 34.68 TRAINING BOOKS FOR STAFF +323090 2261 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 69.31 TRAINING BOOKS FOR STAFF 323090 2261 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 69.36 TRAINING BOOKS FOR STAFF ; 323090 2261 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 173.35 375053 915/2013 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 320.00 HOSTING FEE 323018 186 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 914/2013 13:15:31 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20D00 Page - 15 Council Check Register 9/5/2013 - 9/512013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 320.00 375054 9/512013 101146 MATRIX TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN -MIS 371.84 323019 608152205 1554.6188 371.84 375055 91512013 131877 MCGRATH, PATTY REIMBURSE 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 233.08 CONCESSION PRODUCT 323292 233.08 375056 915/2013 125941 MCOUAY INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 313.95 DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR 323020 2602475 5511.6180 1,139.02 DESERT AIRE SERVICE 323293 2601550 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 716.90 POOL HEATER SERVICE 323294 2602548 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 622.41 REPLACE GFI POOL HEATER 323295 2602798 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,792.28 375057 91512013 103944 MED COMPASS 7414.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 605.00 HEARING TESTS, BLOOD TESTS 323296 21976 605.00 375058 91512013 101483 MENARDS 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13.97 BIT, SCREW 00001816 323297 34486 180.29 LUMBER, NAILS, CORD 00001838 323298 34871 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 194.26 375059 915/2013 101987 MENARDS 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 213.96 UTILITY PUMPS, HOSE 00002197 323299 19708 213.96 375060 91512013 102602 METRO CASH REGISTER OFFICE.SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 75.80 THERMAL RECEIPT PAPER 323175 74795 5430.6513 75.80 375061 91512013 128364 MHP 83.31 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 257772 JEAN TEMPLE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.31 375062 91512013 104650 MICRO CENTER 122.83 DVDS FOR iCOP 00003005 323021 4596496 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 122.83 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Council Check Register Page - 16 9/512013 - 9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 375063 915/2013 100351 MIKE'S SHOE REPAIR INC. 20.00 GEAR REPAIRS 323091 8202013. 1470.6180 i CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00 375064 91512013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,143.75 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 00001751 323022 34512 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,143.75 375065 9/512013 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,940.00 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 00001754 323092 34519 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,940.00 375066 91512013 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 32.18 WINDOW WASHING 323300 928014050 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS . VERNON OCCUPANCY 42.75 323301 928014049 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS" YORK OCCUPANCY 74.93 375067 915/2013 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 419.45 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 323023 24831 162816103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 419.45 375068 91512013 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. - 20.35 GASKETS 00001841 323302 0101158 -IN 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING 20.35 375069 9/512013 108537 MOORE, JOEL 58.75 FUEL REIMBURSEMENT 323024 081513 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.75 375070 9/5/2013 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 683.95- RETURN MOUNTS 323176 920609 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 218.01 FUEL SOLENOID 00006471 323177 921668 -00 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 71.56 IRRIGATION PIPE, SOIL STAPLES 00002008 323178 922003 -00 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 22.96 MUFFLER CLAMP 00006474 323179 922239 -00 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 257.65 COIL, PLUG WIRES 00006471 323180 921668 -01 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 1,336.87 PICKER IGNITION 00006474 323181 922239 -01 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 746.01 2 -SPOOL VALVE 00006475 323182 922486 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 12.00 CLAMP 323183 922952 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 413.52 REAR LIFTARM - 00006478 323184 923226 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,253.63 SPRINKLERS 00006483 323185 925316 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4,648.26 CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 9/5/2013 -9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 375071 91512013 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 463.50 323226 84203 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 288.50 323393 84202 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 752.00 375072 91512013 132659 NEW LIFE CONTRACTING 219.88 PERMIT REFUND - WRONG ADDRESS 323098 ED123752 1495.4111, BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 219.88 375073 915/2013 104350 NIKE USA INC. 650.20 SHIRTS 323186 952658186 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 70.66 RAIN SUIT 323187 952778870 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 720.86 375074 91512013 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 1,349.83 LIGHT BARS, LIGHTS 00005416 323188 34198 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,349.83 375075 91512013 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 162.88 THERMAL PAPER 323189 671145646001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 58.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 323303 671183416001 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 221.26 375076 91512013 118145 PADDLE WHEELER 138.25 CRANK SETS 00002024 323093 1481 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 138.25 375077 91512013 132655 PAPPAS PROFESSIONAL DETAILING 69.63 EXTERIOR CLEANING 00003003 323025 013 -3523 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.63 375078 91512013 119486 PARAGON BLACK DIRT 1,000.35 BLACK DIRT 323094 4746 47084.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT LAKE EDINA PK PATHWAY 1,000.35 375079 9/5/2013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,285.90 323127 8413567 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 690.70 323128 8413563 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 209.50 323129 8412589 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,255.65 323227 8413555 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,441.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Council Check Register Page - 18 915/2013 -9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 375080 9/512013 119219 PC /NAMETAG 86.72 LAMINATING SUPPLIES 323026 15542479 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 86.72 375081 91512013 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 431.14 323027 16933109 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,403.25 323228 16933175 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 57.60 323229 17277020 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 153.91 323304 16933125 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 2,045.90 375082 9/5/2013 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC 150.00 NEIGHBORHOOD POSTCARDS 323345 082313 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 375083 915/2013 117087 PETERSON COMPANIES 7,850.00 NEW MAINLINE IRRIGATION 323028 25097 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 133,956.00 GARDEN PARK RENOVATIONS 323346 APPL 1 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 141,806.00 375084 9/5/2013 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 635.93 323230 2476896 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 508.58 323231 2476897 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 827.64 323232 2476898 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 450.08 323233 2476891 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 674.26 323234 2476900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,939.08 323235 2476901 • 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 61.60 323236 12476892 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,088.14 323237 2476899 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,087.08 323238. 2476893 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 637.49 323394 2476894 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 752.55 323395 2476890 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9,662.43 375085 91512013 100953 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 50.40 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003660 323095 114038291 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.40 375086, 91512013 132653 PINAPATI, YASH 53.00 REFUND FOR UNCHASHED CHECK 323029 ART CENTER 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER.REVENUES CLASS 53.00 9/4/2013 13:15:31 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Page - 19 Council Check Register 9/5/2013 - 9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 375087 91512013 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 256.00 323239 19112 5842.5515 256.00 375088 91512013 116619 PIPELINE SUPPLY INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 49.60 PVC CAPS 00006223 323190 S3109188.003 5422.6406 49.60 375089 915/2013 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,376.75 PLANT MAINTENANCE 323305 318522 5720.6620 2,376.75 375090 91512013 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION,GEN 612.89 TIRES 00005451 323099 210073800 1553.6583 105.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005451 323191 210076215 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 220.23 SERVICE CALL - FLAT TIRE 00005451 323306 210075566 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1 938.12 375091 91512013 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 312.50 NITRLE GLOVES 323030 51258 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 312.50 375092 91512013 108322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 904.29 LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00002021 323096 6294 5765.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 671.86 TISSUE, LINERS, CLEANERS 00002021 323097 6402 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 299.28 TISSUE, GLOVES, CLEANER 00002202 323307 6526 572b.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 94.29 HOT CUP SLEEVES 00007700 323308 6297 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 461.91 CAN LINERS, VACUUM 00002195 323309 6301 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,431.63 375093 91512013 131068 RADABAUGH, JOHN 97.72 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 301840 6705 VERNON AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 97.72 376094 91512013 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 988.38 EMULSION 323192 3870 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION '. 988.38 375095 915/2013 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 417.53 SHOCK ABSORBERS, DOOR PANEL00005517 323193 B8997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 417.53 R55CKREG LOG20000 UTY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Council Check Register Page - 20 9/5/2013 — 9/5/2013' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No _ Inv No 1 Account No Subledger- Account Description Business Unit 375096 8/512013 125936 REINDERS INC. 2,857.84 FERTILIZER 00006476 323194 3022444 -00 5431.6540 FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 3,154.95 FERTILIZER 00001810 323310 3022512 -00 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 6,012.79 375097 9/5/2013 100977 RICHFIELD' PLUMBING COMPANY 136.00 CLEARED FLOOR DRAIN 323195 62034 5430.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 136.00 CLEARED FLOOR DRAIN 323196 62047 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 272.00 375098 9/5/2013 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 83,337.52 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 323382 090613 44010.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW FACILITY FUEL CANOPY 83,337.52 - 375099 9/5/2013 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 113.50 323130 69731 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 113.50 375100 9/5/2013 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 2,907.00 GRIND DEBRIS WITH TUB GRINDER 323311 ..73797 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,907.00 375101 91512013 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 22.19 0402 37306935 0 323312 082013 01412.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES GLEN VIEW ADDITION NHOOD RECON 47.70 0402 37306935 0 323312 082013 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 55.23 0402 37306935 0 323312 082013 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 125.12 375102 91512013 132076 SCHERBER CO. 2,500.00 REFUND ESCROW -4609 56TH ST W 323325 12314. 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 375103 91512013 100995 SEH 292.79 EDINA WATER MODEL UPDATE 323031 271824 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,312.11 INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 323032 271750 08060.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 1,604.90 375104 9/512013 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 40.34 NAME PLATE 323197 43800 1100.6103 -' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY COUNCIL 338.34 SIGNS 323197 43800 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 378.68 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 375105 91512013 375106 91512013 375107 9/512013 375108 91612013 375109 91512013 375110 9/512013 375111 91512013 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/5/2013 —9/512013 A t Su lier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No moun pp 103219 SGN WENDEL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,173.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 323383 3702 1,173.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 121382 SIGNATURE AQUATICS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,216.06 UV BY -PASS, FILTER FLUSH 323313 1693 4,216.06 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,258.84 YORK SELLING 323240 1069193 2,908.34 323241 1069195 .50 323242 1069186 40.62 323243 1069190 3,574.43 323244 1069189 3,932.00 323245 1069187 .50 323246 1069192 32.00- 323247 9009778 1,120.00- 323248 9013245 1,100.00- 323249 9013263 2,075.00- 323250 9006637 8,558.00- 323251 9015409 2,220.00- 323252 9014953 472.00- 323253 0004326 140.00- 323254 9015508 -1 1,556.83 323396 1069183 2,655.06 132667 SOWADA & BARNA PLUMBING 15.50 PERMIT REFUND - JOB CANCELLED 323347 ED123741 15.50 105152 SPAIN, MARK - PW 79.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 323100 082713 79.98 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 5,245.20 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 323033 1304 5,245.20 104672 SPRINT 3.36 323139 129 47078.6710 5720.6180 5862.5513 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5862.5512 5842.5512 5822.5512 5822.5512 5862.5512 5842.5512 5862.5512 5822.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 1495.4112 1646.6201 5913.6103 1190.6188 Subledger Account Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 914/2013 13:15:31 Page - 21 Business Unit COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS LAUNDRY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/412013 13:15:31 Council Check Register Page - 22 915/2013 -915/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3.84 323139 129 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 15.20 323139 129 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 22.40 323139 129 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 35.84 323139 129 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 50.01 323139 129 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 51.29 323139 129 1490.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 55.84 323139 129 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.32 323139 129 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 73.12 323139 129 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 89.28 323139 129 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 94.72 323139 129 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 184.84 323139 129 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 188.75 323139 129 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 417.65 323139 129 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 432.21 323139 129 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 504.51 323139 129 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 506.10 323139 129 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 559.86 323139 129 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,042.68 323139 129 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,403.82 375112 9/512013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 74.10 FITTINGS 00001747 323034 S2775259:0011 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 8.30 GAS 00001823 323035 S2775863.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 18.22 ADAPTER 00001747 323036 S2776863.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 420.00 CONVERSION KIT, SIDE MOUNT 00001831 323101 S2776729.001 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 225.56 FITTINGS 00001747 323102, S2777756.001 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 746.18 375113 91512013 129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SO 214.55 BATTERY 00003667 323348 10517379 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 214.55 375114 9/5/2013 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 260.00 SUBSCRIPTION, 323314 1908753 -8/13 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 260.00 375115 91512013 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 79.26 CABLE 00005418 323198 498172 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.26 3751116 9/5/2013 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS CITY OF EDINA 914/2013 13:15:31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Page - 23 Council Check Register 9/512013 —9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 45.47 PUBLISH NOTICE 323037 1456825 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 45.47 375117 915/2013 132560 SWENCRAFT 2,800.00 COUNTERTOP INSTALLATION 32303a BALANCE 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 2,800.00 375118 9/512013 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 323199 789827 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 40.00 375119 9/5/2013 129564 TAKALO, CRAIG 108.00 MODEL 323140 082913 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 108.00 375120 91512013 101027 TARGET BANK 114.60 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 323200 081813 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 114.60 375121 91512013 132656 TASA, SUSAN 18.00 SR CENTER CLASS REFUND 323103 082713 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 18.00 375122 91512013 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 116.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 323104 082313 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 116.96 375123 91512013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 801.00 323255 00771246 323372 773585 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,875.85 323373 773586 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 116.00 4,792.85 375124 915/2013 103218 TRI STATE BOBCAT 683.25 CYLINDER, HYDRAULIC FLUID 00005523 323201 P24824 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 683.25 375125 91512013 100682 TRUGREEN PROCESSING CENTER 112.64 LAWN SERVICE 323315 10742632 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 112.64 375126 9/512013 118190 TURFWERKS LLC I� R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Council Check Register Page - 24 9/5/2013 -9/512013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 632.49 CABLES 00006428 323202 M103595, 5422,6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 632.49 375127 9/512013 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 773.19 FILTERS 00008040 323039 0537764 -IN 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 773.19 375128 9/512013 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 1,058.08 SPRINGS, PLUGS 00005183 323040 397938 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,058.08 375129 9/512013 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 733.43 SEED 00006228 323203 30789 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 733.43 375130 9/5/2013 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) 288.55 CLUTCH, DRUM, BELTS 00005509 323204 113545550 -001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 288.55 375131 915/2013 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC 44.76 CLEAT CLEANER, ROSIN BAGS 00001638 323316 150- 0002819 -01 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 179.52 FIELD PAINT 00001695 323317 1501- 000905 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 224.28 375132 9/5/2013 100050 USPS- HASLER 8,000.00 ACCT #75983 323041 082813 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,000.00 375133 91512013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 68.34 CUPS 323205 283013 -02 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 12.42- CREDIT 323206 204209CM 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 569.43 CAN LINERS 00001836 323318 284250 -00 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 625.35 375134 91512013 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.. 53.18 VOLTAGE REGULATOR 323207 69448 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 875.83 CONTROLLER, BRAKE CABLE 00006479 323208 69689 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 201.62 FILTER 00006481 323209 69704 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 1,130.63 375135 9/5/2013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 167.08 GFI PLUG INS 00001828 323319 7574099 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 914/2013 13:15:31 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 9/512013 -9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 18.79 BLANK COVERS 00001834 323320 7580021 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 185.87 375136 91512013 119454 VINOCOPIA 241,83 323131 0082576 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 241.83 375137 91512013 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 495.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 323042 37381097 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,718.35 CONCESSION PRODUCT 323321 37384866 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,213.35 375138 91512013 132064 WINDFELDT, STEPHANIE 750.00 GOGGLE VIRTUAL TOUR 323322 AQUATIC CENTER 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 750.00 375139 91512013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 754.85 323256 338535 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 323257 338676 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 340.40 1,095.25 375140 9/512013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 608.96 323256 469108 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 246.24 323259 469105 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 146.24 323374 469104 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,677,71 323375 469107 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,679.15 375141 915/2013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 123.02 323132 1080078149 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,446.14 323133 1080078139 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 150.20 323134 1080078142 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,396.20 323135 1080078140 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,389.44 323260 1080078145 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,298.13 323261 1080078146 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,632.69 323397 1080078143 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 874.47 1 323398 1080079393 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 526.90 323399 1080079514 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 153.15- 323400 2080015354 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19,684.04 375142 9/5/2013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Council Check Register Page - 26 9/512013 -9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,111.40 323136 1090099911 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 192.00 323137 1090099912 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,282.50 323138 1090099070 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,914.05 323376 1090102411 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 96.00 323377 1090102412 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 64.50 323378 1090102413 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,177.00 323379 1090102416 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 717.00 323380 1090102417 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,554.45 375143 91512013 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 189.34 MINI GOLF BALLS 00002025 323105. 302504 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 189.34 375144 91512013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 568.00 6500 FRANCE SENIOR HOUSING 323106 3- 01686 -430 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 568.00 375145 9/5/2013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,502.17 51- 5547446 -1 323044 380822363 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 1,746.64 51- 5107681 -4 323045 380786005 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 18.97 51- 0193479 -4 323046 380697336 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 149.76 51- 9608462 -5 323047 380869195 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 3,001.35 51- 9011854 -4 323048 380949004 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 14.29 51- 6050184 -2 323049 380634528 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 41.42 51- 8976004 -9 323050 380847966 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 44.41 51- 8997917 -7 323051 380676533 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 93.45 51- 9770164 -7 323052 380683033 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 23.94 51- 9770163 -6 323053 380691359 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 39.05 51- 0194596 -8 323054 380535548 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.29 51- 6541084 -2 323055 380641399 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 245.57 51- 6223269 -1 323056 380804243 ' 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 30.71 51- 0160483 -1 323057 380535919 1330.6165 LIGHT '& POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 32.07 51- 0223133 -2 323058 380537041 1322.6165 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 58.52 51- 4420190 -3 323059 380604061 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 189.85 51- 8987646 -8 323060 380856353 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 97.06 51- 6692497 -0 323061 380975085 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 3,444.39 51- 4159265 -8 323323 380780871 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 10,099.85 51- 6955679 -8 323403 381157500 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL' 21,887.76 375146 91512013 132553 YALE MECHANICAL 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Page - 27 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/5/2013 -- 9/5/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,738.74 REPAIR AIR CONDITIONER 00001668 323107 141893 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,738.74 375147 915/2013 129406 ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC 350.00 NEW CAR RUST PROTECTION 00005485 323043 95476 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 350.00 375148 91512013 101091 ZIEGLER INC 00005518 323108. PC001492943 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 104.44 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 104.44 375149 915/2013 106459 CLASSIC CATERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200.00 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION LUNCH 323456 DOWNPAYMENT 1513.6103 200.00 Payment Instrument Totals 742,793.08 Grand Total Check Total 742,793.08 Total Payments 742,793.08 9/4/2013 13:15:31 Page - 27 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/4/2013 13:17:30 Council Check Summary Page - 1 9/5/2013 - 9/5/2013 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 167,239.89 02200 DNU OLD COMMUNICATIONS FUND 32.17 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 232,754.84 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 14,821.43 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,846.02 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,551.07 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 9,730.83 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,808.31 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 2,593.55 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 13,180.91 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,608.20 05800 LIQUOR FUND 137,212.32 05900 UTILITY FUND 100,024.27 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 20,731.85 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 6,961.13 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 90.53 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,605.76 Report Totals 742,793.08 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing-poll 'es and s" procedure � � r CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 9/12/2013 - 9112/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 375150 9/12/2013 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL 2,885.36 SEPT 2013 SERVICE 324106 5688932 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,885.36 375151 9112/2013 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 122.00 323500 1717359 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 148.40 323501 1716592 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 152.40 323561 1717360 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 102.00 324023 1718491 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 38.80 324024 1719795 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 33.20 324025 1717358 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 70.00 324026 1719182 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 54.80 324027 1719183 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 87.60 324028 1718497 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.80 324029 1719181 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 828.00 375152 9112/2013 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 167.32 CARBON DIOXIDE 324107 31114750 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 142.08 CARBON DIOXIDE 324108 31113308 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 309.40 375153 911212013 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 59.35 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 323532 123745 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 59.35 375154 911212013 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. 90.00 BIKE BLVD DESIGN 323404 54258 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 90.00 375155 911212013 132670 AMERICAN BANK OF THE NORTH 151.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 323457 6408 TIMBER 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RIDGE 151.88 375156 9112/2013 100627 AMERICAN TEST CENTER INC. 1,257.00 LADDER TESTING 323718 2132483 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,257.00 375157 911212013 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 70.21 123458 083113 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 104.83 I 323458 083113 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 375158 9112/2013 1553.6530 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 144.22 323458 083113 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 161.86 323458 083113 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 200.24 323458 083113 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 275.60 323458 083113 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 603.93 323458 -083113 1470.6201 LAUNDRY COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 2 Business Unit - VERNON OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,560.89 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 375158 9112/2013 1553.6530 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 732.74 927.60 FOOD 323459 1983571 5421.5510 15.32- 33.00 323460 1980446 5421.5510 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 568.07 CONCESSION PRODUCT 324109 1983532 5730.5510 YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 1,480.35 090113 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 375159 911212013 090113 118491 APPLE INC. RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 2,914.62 IMAC 00004346 323533 1800398699 1554.6710 2,914.62 375160 911212013 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 357.33 COFFEE 323534 1084869 1550.6406 163.67 COFFEE 323661 9981782 7411.6406 521.00 375161 911212013 132589 ARIZON STRUCTURES WORLDWIDE LL 353,270.90 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324150 APPL 3 5200.1727 353,270.90 375162 911212013 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 704.00 323562' 26736 5842.5514 890.00 323563 26569 5822.5514 652.00 .324030 26844 5862.5514 470.00 324031 26949 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 2 Business Unit - VERNON OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 375163 9112/2013 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 732.74 UNDERBODY BOX 00005482 323405 10120126 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS_ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 732.74 375164 911212013 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 323662 090113 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 323662 090113 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 323662 090113 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 56.55 323662 090113 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 66.29 323662 090113 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.66 323662 090113 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 73.92 323662 090113 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 99.35 323662 090113 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 162.79 323662 090113 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 175.62 323662 090113 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 207.79 323662 090113 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 208.31 323662 090113 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 208.32 323662 090113 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 21725 323662 090113 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 269.56 323662 090113 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 309.03 323662 090113 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 385.86 323662 090113 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 399.03 323662 090113 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 646.03 323662 090113 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,665.35 375165 911212013 132408 AUTHENTIC EDGE LLC 3,131.25 MANAGEMENT COACHING SESSION 323461 INV -1 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 3,131.25 375166 9/1212013 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON 1 213.70 ALTERNATOR REBUILD 00005460 323406 153920 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 213.70 375167 911212013 120995 AVR INC. 1,019.59 READY MIX 00001245 323506 80602 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 4,248.28 READY MIX 00001245 323507 83208 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 3,058.76 READY MIX 00001245 323508 83020 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 2,435.68 READY MIX 00001245 323509 83283 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 2,152.46 READY MIX 00001245 323510 84189 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 969.89 READY MIX 00001245 323511 84390 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 2,095.82 READY MIX 00001245 323512 84286 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 15,980.48 376168 911212013 119457 BARBARA SCHNEIDER FOUNDATION 560.00 CRISIS TRAINING - D. BOOSALIS 323407 241 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 560.00 375169 911212013 104345 BARCLAYAUDIO 1,448.80 REPAIRS TO SOUND SYSTEM 00002018 288660 051812 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 520.28 MICROPHONE 00002019 288661 052112 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Council Check Register Page - 4 9/12/2013 - 9/1212013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,969.00 375170 9112/2013 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 8,187.50 MODELING & ANALYSIS 323406 23271180.00 -14 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 8,187.50 375171 9/12/2013 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 37.19 BATTERIES 323663 018 - 313760 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 97.90 BATTERIES 323663 018 - 313760 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 135.09 375172 911212013 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG 97.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 323462 090313 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 97.75 375173 9/1212013 129549 BEHLEN, NATE 14.13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 324103 090913 5919.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS TRAINING 14.13 375174 911212013 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 54.84 323503 88982300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 41.00 323504 79564300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 225.24 323505 6358900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 247.10 323564 79564200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 248.20 324032 79653800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON.SELLING 194.51 324033 89016600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 316.65 324034 79653700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 112.62 324035 6361700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,440.16 375175 911212013 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 583.54 SEPT.2013 LAWN SERVICE 323664 141659 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 583.54 375176 911212013 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 98.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003007 323513 WO- 876111 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 323535 OE- 328542 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20.61 MAILERS 323536 WO- 875901 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 26.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009286 323719 WO- 876192 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 119.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 323720 WO- 876779 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 81- CREDIT 324110 CP -OE- 325697 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 6.77- CREDIT 324111 CP -OE- 325697 -1- ' '1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/1212013 - 9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit - 2 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page- 5 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1470.6510 317.70 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 375177 911212013 GENERAL 115305 BLENKER, DEAN FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 35.40 UNIFORM PURCHASE GENERAL 323409 083013 01398.1705.21 35.40 375178 9/1212013 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 23.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 323721 89876 59.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 324112 88562 24.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 324113 88767 107.41 376179 9112/2013 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 119.40 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003659 323722 81174593 2,985.84 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003659 323723 81174592 60.52 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003659 323724 81187668 1,423.92 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003669 323725 81189134 4,589.68 375180 911212013 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,093.50 323565 115282 2,147.00 323566 115280 211.00 323567 115332 917.50 323568 115281 340.50 324036 115338 4,709.50 375181 911212013 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 384.25 MATERIALS TESTING 323410 373604 923.25 MATERIALS TESTING 323411 373603 936.25 MATERIALS TESTING 323412 373599 615.25 MATERIALS TESTING 323413 373600 1,599.00 MATERIALS TESTING 323414 373601 4,458.00 375182 911212013 122074 BUIE, BARB 18.86 PETTY CASH 323665 090613 176.62 PETTY CASH 323665 090613 195.48 375183 911212013 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page- 5 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 47088.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 07108.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 01394.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 01395.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 01398.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK COMMUNITY GARDEN PARK LOT S108 SCHOOL ROAD NORMANDALE BRAEMAR HILLS B LAKE EDINA B CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Council Check Register Page - 6. 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 73.14 OCE MAINTENANCE 324114 988035935 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 56.83 OCE MAINTENANCE 324115 ..'.988048929 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 746.88 OCE 300 SUPPLIES 324116 902083745 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 238.77 OCE 300 SUPPLIES 324117 902091130 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 352.18 MAINTENANCE KIT- 324118 902092022 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1,467.80 112.44 952 826 -7398 323417 7398 -8/13 7410.6103 375184 911212013 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 323418 0297 -8/13 4090.6188 57.23 5,793.00 323463 323569 350539 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 25.30 0146 -8/13 323570 350536 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 680.50 5841.6188 323571 350535 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 375185 911212013 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 97.50 323572 96550 5862.5513 244.50 323573 96579 5842.5513 342.00 375186 911212013 123898 CENTURYLINK 344.91 952 927 -8861 323415 8861 -8/13 1554.6188 88.60 952 941 -1019 323416 1019 -8/13 7411.6188 112.44 952 826 -7398 323417 7398 -8/13 7410.6103 57.04 952 929 -0297 323418 0297 -8/13 4090.6188 57.23 323463 0146 -8/13 5911.6188 59.93 323463 0146 -8/13 1628.6188 121.92 323463 0146 -8/13 5841.6188 143.55 323463 0146 -8/13 5821.6188 169.97 323463 0146 -8/13 1622.6188 192.79 323463 0146 -8113 5932.6188 238.82 323463 0146 -8/13 1646.6188 279.27 323463 0146 -8/13 5511.6188 733.67 323463 0146 =8/13 1554.6188 41.48 323514 9246 -8/13 1400.6188 2,641.62 375187 911212013 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 947.81 6/13 - 8/13 LAB SERVICES 00001922 323537 090313 ` 5915.6136 947.81 375188 9112/2013 102504 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 250.00 TECH DAY REGISTRATION 323668 090613 1554.6104 250.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE WELL PUMPS SENIOR CITIZENS YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY SKATING & HOCKEY GENERAL STORM SEWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 9/1112013 7:46:57 Page- 7 Business Unit INSPECTIONS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT INSPECTIONS DWI.FORFEITURE COMMUNICATIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE ARENA CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/12/2013 — 9112/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 375189 9/1212013 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 240.00 AIRWATCH LICENSES 324119 COM -0052 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 240.00 375190 911212013 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 384.42 XCEL BILLING 00001920 323464 5676 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 384.42 375191 911212013 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 3,528.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 324120 8113,9113 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,528.00 375192 911212013 103141 CMI INC. 260.17 DATA MASTER GAS /MOUTHPIECES 323419 791362 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 260.17 375193 911212013 101345 COLOURS 1,994.00 ARENA BROCHURE DESIGN 324122 10349 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,502.53 ARENA BROCHURE 324122 10349 5510.6575 PRINTING 5,496.53 375194 911212013 120433 COMCAST 68.88 8772110 614 0177449 323666 177449 -8/13 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 90.90 8772,10 614 0164959 323667 164959 -8/13 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 159.78 375195 911212013 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 154.48 BROOMS, SAFETY VESTS 00001840 323726 0101156 -IN 1301.6556 TOOLS _ 154.48 375196 9/12/2013 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 176.31 ELEMENTS, RIBS 00009282 323727 R200389152 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS 176.31 375197 9112/2013 .102332 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES OF THE TWI 2,060.00 REMOVE / REPLACE DOOR & FRAME 323728 130709 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,060.00 375198 9/1212013 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,189.57 BIRTHDAY PARTY SUPPLIES 323465 23340 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 654.97 GUARD SHIRTS 324121 22206 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 9/1112013 7:46:57 Page- 7 Business Unit INSPECTIONS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT INSPECTIONS DWI.FORFEITURE COMMUNICATIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE ARENA CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 323673 082613 - 5421.5510 CITY OF EDINA GRILL 251.25 Council Check Register 375203 9112/2013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 9/12/2013 -9/12/2013 323574 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,844.54 4,005.55 323576 717055 5842.5514 375199 9/1212013 1,196.00 130131 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE 5822:5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,138.40 115.01 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 285397• 5845 BEARD AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 161.00 324037 717559 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER S 556.00 324038 717558 115.01 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 751.20 324039 376200 911212013 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 104020 DALCO 181.77 PUNCH DEGREASER 00001813 :323729 2641580: 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 329.43 TOWELS 00009274 323730 2646047 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 21.46- CREDIT 00005458 323731 2644323RETURN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 489.74 376201 911212013 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE 333.46 PEAT 00001865 323732 3909,3917 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 333.46 375202 911212013 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page- 8 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER BLOG/MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION 251.25 DAIRY. 323673 082613 - 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 251.25 375203 9112/2013 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,530.85 323574 717107 5862.5514 COST,OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.90 323575 717106 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,005.55 323576 717055 5842.5514 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,196.00 323577 716355 5822:5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,138.40 323578 717054 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 161.00 324037 717559 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 556.00 324038 717558 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 751.20 324039 717553 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 11,382.90 375204 9/12/2013 101657 DEHN, BRUCE 14.13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 324104 090913 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 14.13 375205 911212013 100720 DENNYS STH AVE. BAKERY 113.58 BAKERY 323669 471369 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 100.40 323670 471370 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 213.98 375206 911212013 132669 DESIGN FLAGS CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 9/12/2013 — 9/1212013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,495.00 FLAGPOLE REPAIRS 323420 5004 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,495.00 375207 9/1212013 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 1,583.76 110311893 323671 110311893 -8/13 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,583.76 375208 911212013 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 296.74 PAINT 00001779 323733 802147537 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 793.01 PAINT 00001761 323734 802147400 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1,702.31 PAINT 00001761 323735 802147522 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2,792.06 375209 911212013 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 219.50 NEIGHBORHOOD POSTCARDS 323538 5854 -01 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 219.50 375210 9/1212013 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 883.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 323539 32209 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 883.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 323539 32209 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 883.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 323539 32209 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,650.00 375211 911212013 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONST 20,030.75 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324151 APPL 3 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 20,030.75 375212 911212013 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONST 36,290.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324152 APP 1 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 36,290.00 375213 9/1212013 132446 DO TRAINING RESTAURANTS LLC 47.28 BIRTHDAY CAKES 324123 08212013 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 47.28 375214 9112/2013 104192. DYNAMIC BRANDS 43.95 WHEELS FOR RENTAL PUSH CARTS 323672 858142 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 43.95 375215 911212013 105417 EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 10,000.00 ANNUAL SUPPORT 323540 2013 1516.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HISTORICAL SOCIETY 10,000.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 METER REPAIR CITY OF EDINA METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR Council Check Register METER REPAIR 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 375216 911212013 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 45.70 323674 #41 BRAEMAR 5420.5514 BANQUET 182.25 323674., #41 BRAEMAR 5420.5513 BANQUET 227.95 375217 911212013 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 94.66 MANAGEMENT FEE 323541 090413 1550.6155 94.66 375218 911212013 102865 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN 87.89 PAPER ROLLS, AUTOMARKS 323542 859876 .1180.6406 87.89 375219 911212013 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 6,359.06 MANHOLE LIDS 00001252 323421 SS4924 5932.6536 6,359.06 375220 9/1212013 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 502.50 323502 W-8.12915, 5862.5515 502.50 375221 911212013 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY. 179.87 FOX SPLASH- 2DRUMFOB 323422, 14258885 1553.6530 77.23 BATTERY -323736 14233902 1553.6530 73.22 FVP C31 -11AP 323737 14256224 1553.6530 330.32 375222 911212013 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 9.16 BOLTS 00005193 324124. MNTC2116916 5311.6406 41.44 ZIPLINE HARDWARE 00001815 324125 MNTC2119331 5311.6406 41.68 ZIPLINE BOLTS 324126 MNTC2119439 5311.6406 92.28 375223 911212013 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 939.39 METERS 00001759 323466 0042743 -1 5917.6530 2,135.00 METERS 00001759 323467 0046218 5917.6530 7.28 GASKETS 00001759 323468 0046280. 5917.6530 3,106.51 METERS 000017591-323469' 0040227 -2 ,5917.6530 6,168.18 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Business Unit CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 10 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION CASTINGS. GENERAL STORM SEWER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 9112/2013 — 9112/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 376224 911212013 122077 FIELDS, DEBRA 55.00 COSTCO MEMBERSHIP FEE 323675 090413 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 55.00 375225 911212013 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 338.55 REPLACE LOCK 00001926 323738 348617 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 338.55 375226 911212013 132694 FULTON, MATTHEW S 5,000.00 GOLF COURSE STUDY 324019 090213 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 5,000.00 376227 9/1212013 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 323676 1006672436 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 323677 1006694818 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 30.00 I - 375228 911212013 102419 GARDEN S ASSOCIATES INC 110.00 INTERPRETER 323678 124964 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 110.00 376229 9/1212013 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN 19,236.00 REPLACEMENT WATER /SUMP TANKS 323470 42397 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 19,236.00 375230 9/1212013 127515 GILGENBACH, JORDAN 175.72 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 324144 090913 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 175.72 375231 911212013 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 68.83 R- 911PHONE 323739 4978104 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.83 375232 911212013 102764 GOLDEN VALLEY ORCHESTRA 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 5/01/11 288131 RE -ISSUE 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 376233 9112/2013 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 2,163.85 AUG 2013 SERVICE 00001921 323471 78351 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 2,163.85 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY.OF EDINA ,- Council Check Register 9/12/2013 - 9112/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger ,Account Description 375234 911212013 132593 GORMAN SURVEYING INC 1,023.75 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324153 8163, 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 1,023.75 375235 911212013 129548 GPRS 30.00 SEMINAR - JESSICA NIKUNEN 323680 OCT 17 1170.6104: CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS REGISTRATION 30.00 SEMINAR - VICKI OLSON 323680 OCT 17 1160.6104'. CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS REGISTRATION 60.00 375236 911212013 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 226.10 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00001923 323472 844 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 226.10 375237 911212013 101103 GRAINGER 94.23 CLAMPS 00005486 323740 9227285500 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 263.36 FILTERS; LIGHTBULBS 00002192..324127 " - 9214588734 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 103.24 FILTERS 00001294 324128. 9217421156 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 221.88 CHROME FIXTURE 00002199 324129 9223081432 5720:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 682.71 375238 9/1212013 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC .1,273.25 323579 156539. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 286.74 324040 156535 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 491.25 324041 156540 " - 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,051.24 375239 911212013 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 140.69 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 323741 090613 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 140.69 375240 9112/2013 131557 GRAY MANUFACTURING CO. INC. 718.00 HYDRAULIC FLOOR JACK 00005487 323423 783988 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 718.00 375241 9112/2013 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 9/1112013 7:46:57 Page - 12 Business Unit GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET HUMAN RESOURCES FINANCE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 138.55 GOLF PITCH FIX TOOLS 323679 50534 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 138.55 375242 9112/2013 119985 GRINNELL,- MARGIE 260.00 ART WORK SOLD 298781 100212 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 13 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY 7,306.10 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,567.60 Council Check Register 3508331 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 9/12/2013 — 9/1212013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 260.00 375243 9/1212013 9/1212013 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 193.67 GENERAL REPAIR SUPPLIES 323424 PLY0440885 5841.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 193.67 369.12 PIPE; FLARED END 00001856 323475 375244 911212013 5932.6535 100797 HAWKINS INC. GENERAL STORM SEWER 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 13 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY 7,306.10 CHEMICALS 00001250 323473 3508826 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,567.60 CHEMICALS 00001250 323474 3508331 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 11,873.70 375245 9/1212013 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 369.12 PIPE; FLARED END 00001856 323475 B412447 5932.6535 PIPE GENERAL STORM SEWER 369.12 1 375246 911212013 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 323681 024756 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 375247 9/1212013 106371 - HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 323425 30889 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 376248 9/1212013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,876.75 ROOM & BOARD 323426 I 1000033689 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 1,876.75 375249 911212013 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 337.50 AUG 2013 BOOKING 323682 1000033902 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 337.50 375250 911212013 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,796.70 RADIO ADMIN FEE 323427 130738015 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 323515 1000033814 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 323543 1000033815 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 2,117.32 375251 9/1212013 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 927.71 LAPTOP FOR PW 00004341 323476 53186529 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 927.71 375252 911212013 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/12/2013 - 9/1212013 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,289.00 323580 663510 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,633.00 323581 664808 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 106.94 323582 664811 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,028.94 375253 9112/2013 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 5.14 PW /ENG SUPPLIES 323516 081313 01395.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BRAEMAR HILLS B 63.59 PW /ENG SUPPLIES 323516 081313 01395.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BRAEMAR HILLS B 271.10 PW /ENG SUPPLIES 323516 081313 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 339.83 375254 911212013 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 327.00 INLAND MARINE (COMMERCIAL) 323544 160564 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,011.00 INLAND MARINE (COMMERCIAL) 323742 160859 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 144,923.00 WORKER'S COMP 323743 160858 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 22,641.00 BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE 323744 160857 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 53,638.00 GENERAL LIABILITY 323745 160860 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 225,540.00 375255 911212013 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 577.50 VFD MAINTENANCE 00001756 323428 5983 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 577.50 375256 911212013 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 478.08 MAIL LATE NOTICES 324130 81022 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 478.08 375257 911212013 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 291.00 324042 14109 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 420.00 324043 13999 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 711.00 375258 911212013 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 220.26 BOND - RATING TOUR MANUAL 323545 95186 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 220.26 375259 911212013 118275 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 44.50 NOTARY STAMP - NORGREN 323429 247663 • 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.50 375260 911212013 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 1,799.76 TURNOUT GEAR 00003656 323746 199541 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,799.76 375261 911212013 132687 JENALEX COMPANY 1,322.24 VESTCOOLERS, AIR EXTENDERS 1,322.24 375262 911212013 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 244.00 373.40 5,933.60 56.35 4,924.35 4,771.20 261.00 6.91- CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323683 3839 323684 2132605 323684 2132605 324044 2119689 324045 2119729 324046 2119728 324047 2119714 324048 2119722 324049 2119727 324050 2119721 16,543.94 375263 911212013 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 213.90 CHEMICALS 00005461 323517 65928852 213.90 375264 911212013 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA IN 740.25 EXHAUST REPAIR 00001925 323747 10074133 -00 740.25 375267 911212013 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,132.32 323583 1658189 28.00 323584 1657161 24.00 323585 1657162 259.36 323586 1656403 254.04 323587 1656405 866.84 323588 1656399 754.63 323589 1656396 1,120.46 323590 1656402 1,12 323591 1662005 1,300.99 323592 1662010 1,437.76 323593 1662014 62.74 323594 1662015 521.52 323595 1662017 1,944.13 323596 1662016 2,967.69 323597 1662011 2340.6406 5420.5514 5421.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5842.5514 5822.5514 4091.6406 5915.6180 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5515 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS.SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 15 Business Unit DWI FORFEITURE CLUB HOUSE GRILL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 f . CITY OF EDINA 9111/2013 7:46:57 Council Check Register Page - 16 9/12/2013 - 911212013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit .56 323598 1662001 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 104.95 323599 1655055 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING .18 323600 1656400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.88- 323601 590644 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.33- 323602 589093 5842.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.93- 323603 589098 "5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.33- 323604 589095 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 312.98- 323605 588369 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.67- 323606 589551 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.00- 323607 590045 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 755.82 324051 1661457 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,770.49 324052 1661462 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,357.33 324053 1661465 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,605.38 324054 1662012 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,558.80 324055 1662013 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 32.00 324056 1632882 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,139.11 324057 1662004 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 501.64 324058 1662002 .5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 952.98 324059 1662006 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,962.87 324060 1662000 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,575.74 324061 1661460 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS,SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 323.49 324062 1661466 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 70.48 324063 1661464 .5842.5515 COST OF -GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,478.44 324064 1661463 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.68 324065 1661458 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,600.28 324066 1661461 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,212.32 324067 1661459 5842.5512 -COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 443.35 324068 1661999 _5822:5512 COST.OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 910.06 324069 ^1662003 5822.5512 COST.OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 43,652.43 375268 911212013 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 8.88 CAULK GUN 323430 010883 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 8.88 375269 911212013 100354 LAGUNA CLAY CO. 1,046.58 CLAY 00009267. 323748 180778 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,046.58 375270 911212013 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 1,977.00 ALGAE TREATMENT '00002530'323431 108000 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRO 1,358.00 ALGAE TREATMENT 00002532 323432 .108001. 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 17 Business Unit PONDS & LAKES INSPECTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET i CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/12/2013 — 9/1212013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 838.00 ALGAE TREATMENT 00002531 323433 108002 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,173.00 375271 911212013 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 71.25 UNIFORM SHIRTS 324131 SIN960129 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 71.25 376272 9112/2013 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 87.64 ENGINE OIL 00002000 323685 01 -22196 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 617.35 TRACTOR REPAIR 00002398 323686 01 -27023 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 704.99 375273 911212013 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 688.35 DRILL BITS, CABLE TIES 00001784 323749 9301839003 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 719.07 DRILL BITS, SCREWS, CLEANER 00005419 323750 9301885244 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,407.42 375274 911212013 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 26,615.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 323687 090613 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 26,615.00 375275 911212013 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 30.00 MAYORS ASSOCIATION DUES 323688 2013 1100.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30.00 375276 9/1212013 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 525.95 TOPDRESSING 00002034 323689 214010 5761.6540 FERTILIZER 525.95 375277 9112/2013 132579 LIBERTY ENVELOPE 116.92 ENVELOPES 324132 81641 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 116.92 375278 911212013 132752 LINCO FAB INC. 6,650.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324154 APPL 1 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 6,650.00 375279 911212013 120856 LLOYD'S CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 48,112.72 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324155 APPL 2 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 48,112.72 375280 911212013 100858 LOGIS 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 17 Business Unit PONDS & LAKES INSPECTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Council Check Register Page - 18 9/12/2013 - 9/1212013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 ADMIN FEE 323477 37167 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 141.08 BACKUP TAPES 323477 37167 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,770.19 WIFI AT ROSLAND 323477. 37167 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 77,996.99 CORE SWITCH REPLACEMENT 323477 - 37167 421554.6710 - EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 123.75 SMTF WIFI 323546 37196 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 148.50 WIFI PHONES 323546 37196 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 445.50 IT CONSULTING 323546 37196 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 81,676.01 . 375281 911212013 101792 LUBE -TECH 3,932.87 OIL 00005489 323434 2256412 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,277.09 DIESEL 00006137 323691 2255947 5431.6581 GASOLINE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 988.12 GAS 00006136 323692 2255946 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 618.39 GAS 00006136 323693 2255945 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 6,816.47 375282 911212013 101078 LUBE -TECH ESI 148.43 FUEL PUMP REPAIR 323690 2403 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RANGE 148.43 375283 9/12/2013 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 761.69 324070 159351 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 761.69 375284 911212013 129322 MANAGED DESIGN LLC 450.00 INFRAWORKS TRAINING CLASS 00002573 323435 16296 1260.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 450.00 375285 9/1212013 130484 MARK'S CONCESSION REPAIR LLC 174.88 POPCORN MACHINE REPAIR 323478 1053 5520.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA CONCESSIONS 174.88 375286 911212013 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 111.31 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 324145 090913 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 34.80 STOCK PHOTOS 324147 SEPT2013 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 64.19 STOCK PHOTOS 324147 SEPT2013 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 210.30 375287 9/12/2013 131877 MCGRATH, PATTY 108.14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 324148 090913 5710.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 108.14 9/11/20'ij 7:46:57 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SEWER SERVICE METRO GENERALSUPPLIES SEWER TREATMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILLPOND LK VEGETATION CONTROL WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PRINTING ADMINISTRATION PRINTING ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/12/2013 - 9112/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 375288 911212013 101928 MCKENZIE, THOMAS 214.29 INVESTIGATION EXPENSES 323436 090313 1400.6406 214.29 375289 911212013 101463 MENARDS 32.05 GARAGE DOOR SENSOR 00001859 323437 35226 5841.6406 126.01 PAINT ROLLERS, GLOVES 00001804 323751 34049 1301.6406 27.77 i HARDBOARD 00001691 323752 32494 1314.6406 112.11 NAILS, LUMBER 00001877 323753 35783 1314.6406 41.44 LOCK, CABINET 00001762 323754 33156 1301.6556 74.75 KNEEPADS, COVERS 00001786 323755 33602 1301.6556 32.17- RETURN 323756 35484 5841.6406 381.96 375290 911212013 100885 METRO SALES INC 2,257.94 PD QUARTERLY COPIER MAINT 323479 543056 1554.6230 2,257.94 375291 911212013 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 353,559.94 SEWER SERVICE 323694 0001024747 5922.6302 353,559.94 375292 9/1212013 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 192.30 TISSUE, NAPKINS, LINERS 00003665 323757 34982 1470.6406 192.30 375293 911212013 132059 MIDWEST WEED HARVESTING INC. 1,941.50 HARVESTING - MILLPOND 00002529 323438 ED813.3 5938.6103 1,941.50 375294 911212013 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 27,035.51 WATER PURCHASE 323547 431 - 0005.300 -91 5913.6601 13 27,035.51 376295 911212013 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 21.38 BAND HOSE 00005524 323758 0101291 -IN 1553.6530 21.38 375296 911212013 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 52.56 NEIGHBORHOOD POSTERS 323548 13969 1120.6575 113.28 NEIGHBORHOOD POSTCARDS 323549 13966 1120.6575 9/11/20'ij 7:46:57 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SEWER SERVICE METRO GENERALSUPPLIES SEWER TREATMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILLPOND LK VEGETATION CONTROL WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PRINTING ADMINISTRATION PRINTING ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 195.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 911212013 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 323695 �. 57.64 STUDIO WORKSHOP POSTERS 323759 .13915 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 223.48 375297 911212013 100898 MINVALCO 911212013 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 67.27 SENSOR 324133 910024 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.27 14,250.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324156 376298 911212013 5200.1727 102487 MNISCIA 9111/2013 7:46:57 Page - 20 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING 195.00 FALL CONFERENCE -MIKE LUTZ 323439 00636 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT, GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 167.00 323608 84328 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 167.00 _ 376303 9112/2013 105061 NEW HORIZONS 200.00 EXCEL CLASS - C. FIEDLER 324134 INV- 132504 -N9G7 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION DD 375304 9112/2013 137.86 137.86 375305 911212013 1,702.48 1.702.48 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 324146 090913 1130.6107 132753 NOR DQUIST SIGN COMPANY BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324157 13484 5200.1727 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE' COMMUNICATIONS GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 195.00 375299 911212013 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 550.00 WEDDING GUIDE ADS 323695 �. IN4279 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 550.00 375300 911212013 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 14,250.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324156 APPL 2 . 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 14,250.00 375301 911212013 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS 125.00 ART CENTER ADS 323760 326968 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 125.00 323761 339758 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 125.00 323762 353190 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 375.00 375302 9/1212013 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. - CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 167.00 323608 84328 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 167.00 _ 376303 9112/2013 105061 NEW HORIZONS 200.00 EXCEL CLASS - C. FIEDLER 324134 INV- 132504 -N9G7 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION DD 375304 9112/2013 137.86 137.86 375305 911212013 1,702.48 1.702.48 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 324146 090913 1130.6107 132753 NOR DQUIST SIGN COMPANY BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324157 13484 5200.1727 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE' COMMUNICATIONS GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET Subledger Account Description SIGNS & POSTS REPAIR PARTS 9/11/201:1 7:46:57 Page - 21 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 375306 911212013 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 873.06 I GALVANIZED PIPE 00001854 323763 268502 1325.6531 873.06 375307 911212013 1042132 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 141.68 MAPILIGHT 00005521 323764 34231 1553.6530 141.68 375308 911212013 1323164 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 EAP SERVICES - SEPT 2013 323518 3533 1550.6103 658.75 375309 911212013 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 33.98 FOLDING TABLE 00006034 323696 671792880001 5410.6406 118.04 IPAD KEYBOARD 324135 671183523001 5710.6513 152.02 376310 9112/2013 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 104.52 SLING, RATCHET 00001862 323765 523965 5913.6406 104.52 375311 9112/2013 101439 OLSEN FIRE INSPECTION 245.00 ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER TEST 324136 2033 1646.6103 245.00 375312 9112/2013 132671 OLSEN, BRIAN 612.88" I CONFERENCE EXPENSES 323480 083013 1280.6104 612.88 375313 911212013 101659 ORKIN COMMERCIAL SERVICES 147.57 PEST CONTROL 323550 86551219 1551.6180 147.57 375314 911212013 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 750.75 323609 8414428 -IN 5862.5513 1,338.01 323610 8414426 -IN 5842.5513 1,176.65 324071 8414427 -IN 5822.5513 3,265.41 375315 911212013 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 AUG '2013ACTIVITY 323551 25951208 5910.6155 39.95 Subledger Account Description SIGNS & POSTS REPAIR PARTS 9/11/201:1 7:46:57 Page - 21 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 375316 9112/2013 375317 9/1212013 Amount Supplier / Explanation 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 680.00 IT CONSULTING 680.00 100945 ` PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 401.52 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/12/2013 - 9/1212013 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 323552 82413008 1554.6103 323697 1693242 5430.5510 323698 16933243 5421.5510 375318 9112/2013 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 45.31 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 323611 2474946 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 70.12 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 323612 "2480395 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 753.38 50TH ST SELLING 323613 2480396 58615513 57.12 323614 2480388 5862.5513 1,654.84 323615 2480393 5862.5513 57.12 323616 2480394 5862.5515 619.26 324072 2480086 5842.5513 677.46 324073 2480084 5842.5513 703.68 324074- 2480083 5842.5513 132.54 324075 2480389. 5822.5512 1,341.93 324076 ' 2480085 5842.5512 373.37 324.077 2480387 5822.5513 132.95 324078 2475965 5822.5514 185.60 324079 2480390 5822.5513 6,804.68 �Y 375319 911212013 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 46.30 PEST CONTROL 323699 3819366 7411.6103 46.30 375320 9112/2013 119620- POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 93.52- TIRE 00005451 323440 210075933 1553.6583 3,221.58 TIRES, SERVICE 00005484, 323519 210073801 1553.6180 3,315.10 375321 9/1212013 119429 POVOLNY SPECIALTIES 2,030.62 SIGNAL SERVICE CABINETS 00001818 323520 36622 1330.6530 2,030.63 SIGNAL SERVICE CABINETS 00001818 323520 36622 1322.6530 4,061.25 375322 911212013 129593 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT T Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page- 22 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY TIRES & TUBES CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PROMENADE EXPENSES ICE ARENA REVENUES GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET INMENT 1211109 225210 112009 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER OLD EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 EP ENTERTA CITY OF EDINA RSSCKREG LOG20000 150.00 Council Check Register 375328 911212013 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 9/1212013 — 9112/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 125.00 REGISTRATION - BRIAN THOLEN 323441 Q987 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 125.00 911212013 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 375323 911212013 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 409.50 UNCLOG DRAINS 323701 17257919 299.27 NETWORK CHANGES 323553 64318 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES I 299.27 375330 911212013 375324 911212013 100874 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 113.07 675.00 DRINKING FOUNTAIN REPAIR 00002032 323700 16010 5765.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 675.00 375325 911212013 911212013 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 131676 SAINTS COMMERCIAL FOOD SERVIC 1,016.00 DASHERBOARD AD SALES 324137 913151 -8 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,016.00 125.26 375326 911212013 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 911212013 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 32,774.04 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324149 1305018703 5200.1727 GOLF DOME PAPER CLIPS 324138 32,774.04 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 375327 9/1212013 114687 ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY BAND 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PROMENADE EXPENSES ICE ARENA REVENUES GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET INMENT 1211109 225210 112009 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER OLD EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 150.00 EP ENTERTA 150.00 375328 911212013 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 285.00 DUES - SCOTT NEAL 323554 1940 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 285.00 375329 911212013 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 409.50 UNCLOG DRAINS 323701 17257919 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 409.50 I 375330 911212013 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 323766 929893257 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 113.07 375331 911212013 131676 SAINTS COMMERCIAL FOOD SERVIC 125.26 COOKIES 323702 0076613 -IN 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 125.26 375332 911212013 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 1,269.44 PAPER CLIPS 324138 SH2168 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,269.44 ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/12/2013 -9/12120113 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 375333 9/12/2013 130921 SCHAEFER, LISA 279.11 JUN/JUUAUG MILEAGE 323481 :REIMBURSE 1170:6107 279.11 375334 9112/2013 100349 SCOTTCOUNTY` 175.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 323521 090513 1000.2055 175.00 375335 911212013 100995 SEH 32,420.72 54TH ST PRELIM ENGINEERING 323442 271999 01416.1705.20 1,007.96 RICHMOND HILLS PK RD PROJ 323443. 272121 04387.1705.21 1,251.54 RICHMOND HILLS PK RD PROJ 323443 272121 05525.1705.21 1,338.06 RICHMOND HILLS PK RD PROJ 323443 272121 03471.1705.21 1,931.92 RICHMOND HILLS PK RD PROJ 323443 272121 01388.1705.21 3,065.67 NORMANDALE STREET RECONS 323444 27 -1996 04390.1705.21 7,669.44 NORMANDALE STREET RECONS 323444 271996 05530.1705.21 10,998.48 NORMANDALE STREET RECONS 323444 271996 03474.1705.21 11,535.76 NORMANDALE STREET.RECONS 323444 271996 01394.1705.21 71,219.55 375336 911212013 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 154.82 NAME PLATES 323445 43944 - 1100.6406 154.82 375337 911212013 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 287.49 ACROBAT 00004346 323482 B01217743 1280.6406 287.49 375338 911212013 101556 SHRED -IT USA MINNEAPOLIS 183.98 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 324139 9402389686 5710.6406 183.98 375339 9112/2013 120784 SIGN PRO 124.39 SIGNS 323767 6955 1325.6531 124.39 375340 911212013 121382 SIGNATURE AQUATICS 27,020.50 POOL RESURFACING - BAL DUE 00002188 324140 1692 5700.1705 27,020.50 376341 9/12/2013 131886 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING. INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE &STREET REPAIR RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET CITY OF EDINA 9/11/2013 7:46:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 29.20 HOT DOG BUNS 323483 225588 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 29.20 375342 911212013 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 1,168.02 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 323703 40989 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 325.37 BEER COOLER REPAIR 323704 40990 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 1,493.39 375344 911212013 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 3,466.87 323617 1071078 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 512.50 323618 1071081 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,212.50 323619 1069188 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,375.00 323620 1070568 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,654.25 323621 1070565 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,430.85 323622 1069194 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 403.98 323623 1069184 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,364.56 323624 1071082 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .50 323625 1071080 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,964.00 323626 1071079 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,174.00 323627 1069185 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,315.47 323628 1071075 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,200.88 323629 1071076 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,746.26 323630 1069191 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.00 323631 1070566 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.00 323632 1071077 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,464.00 323633 1070567 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 442.50 324080 1071073 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 454.50 324081 1071074 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 744.50 324082 5002466 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 483.00 324083 5002438 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30,412.12 375345 911212013 101004 SPS COMPANIES 156.59 FITTINGS 00001757 323768 52782703.001 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 66.99- RETURN 324102 52760224.002 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 89.60 375346 911212013 108680 ST. PAUL UTILITIES INC. 38,257.45 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324156 APPL NO. 2 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 38,257.45 375347 911212013 101007 STAR TRIBUNE R55CKREG LOG20000 2,163.00 CITY OF EDINA 375348 9112/2013 Council Check Register 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 AMMO 00003131 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 721.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 323484 1009685704 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 721.00 EDINNLIQUORADS 323484 1009685704 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 721.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 323484 1009685704 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS AMMUNITION GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 26 Business Unit 50TH ST.SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF RANGE CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION'GEN TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,163.00 375348 9112/2013 101015 STREICHERS 430.28 AMMO 00003131 323522 11040477 1400.6104 4,041.00 AMMO 00003131 323522 11040477 1400.6551 89.65 GUN CLEANING PATCHES 323705 11042824 7412.6406 4,560.93 375349 911212013 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 291.88 RELOCATED CABLES IN BLDG DEPT 323555 16896 1554.6103 291.88 375350 911212013 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 22.74 CAP 00005421 323769, 499272 1553.6530 22.74 376351 911212013 105441 SUSA 200.00 UTILITY OPERATIONS (4) 323446 ONE -DAY SCHOOL 5919.6104 200.00 375352 9112/2013 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 402.28 8/22/13 MOVIE 323447 DB1838340 5760.6136 402.28 8/29/13 MOVIE 323448 DB1840757 5760.6136 804.56 375353 911212013 104932 TAYLOR MADE 93.68 MERCHANDISE 323770 21164955 5440.5511 492.04 323771 21174535 5440.5511 78.91 323772 21174536 5440.5511 89.38 GOLF BALLS 323773 21137224` 5440.5511 126.62 MERCHANDISE 323774 21124292 .5440.5511 330.00- PROMO CREDIT 323775 21713712 5440.5511 414.90- JUNE REBATE 323776 - 21714341 5440.5511 135.73 ' 375354 911212013 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 52.95 323634 775049 5862.5515 5,118.85 323635 775048 5862.5514 34.00- 323706 00771265 5421.5514 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS AMMUNITION GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 26 Business Unit 50TH ST.SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF RANGE CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION'GEN TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9111/2013 7:46:57 Page- 27 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9112/2013 -9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 5,137.80 375355 911212013 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 328.16 ELEVATOR REPAIRS 323777 5000115581 1470.6180 328.16 375356 911212013 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 323449 2013 -88740 5822.6122 330.00 I MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 323449 2013 -88740 5842.6122 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 323449 2013 -88740 5862.6122 990.00 375357 911212013 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 364.60 COUNCIL MEETING 8120/13 323556 M19997 1120.6103 192.90 i ART COMMISSION MINUTES 323778 M19998 5110.6103 557.50 375358 9/12/2013 131040 TLO LLC 111.25 AUG 2013 USAGE 323523 269634 -AUG 13 1400.6105 111.25 375359 911212013 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 10.60 BACKGROUND CHECKS 323707 08318552 1400.6160 10.60 375360 911212013 116535 TRAVELERS 6,190.00 DEDUCTIBLE 324141 000444663 1550.6200 6,190.00 375361 9112/2013 103218 TRI STATE BOBCAT 79.41 HYDRAULIC FLUID 00005523 323450 P24929 1553.6584 603.84 CYLINDER 00005523 323451 P24927 1553.6530 683.25 375362 911212013 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 608.95 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 323557 284917 -00 5842.6512 44.40 LIQUOR BAGS 323558 284917 -01 5842.6512 37.25- CREDIT 323559 284211CM 5842.6512 988.81 TISSUE, TOWELS, CAN LINERS 323708 284879 -00 5421.6406 1,604.91 I 375363 9112/2013 1286 1 0 VIDACARE CORPORATION Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9111/2013 7:46:57 Page- 27 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 9/12/2013 —9/1212013 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,678.43 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003670 323779 96605 1470.6510 1,678.43 375364 911212013 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 24.50 BAND SAW BLADES 00001860 323524 7592870 1301.6556 80.23 POWER OUTLET, WP BOXES 00001826 324142 7569692 5311.6406 104.73 375365 9/12/2013 119454 VINOCOPIA 177.50 324084 0083039 -IN 5862.5513 108.75 324085 0083038 -IN 5862.5515 742.00 324086 0083036 -IN 5842.5513 264.63 324087 0083035 -IN 5842.5512 296.75 324088 0083037 -IN 5822.5512 1,589.63 375366 911212013 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,146.55 CONCESSION PRODUCT 323485 37352206 5520.5510 1,146.55 375367 911212013 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 76.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 323525 090413 1553.6201 76.97 375368 911212013 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,225.00 CONSULTANT SERVICES 323709 213017 1140.6103 2,225.00 375369 911212013 101932 VOTH, BART 14.13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 324105 090913 5919.6104 14.13 375370 9/1212013 132751 WARNING LITES OF MN 506.25, ROAD CLOSED SIGNAGE 324143 226 -83013 47078.6710 506.25 375371 911212013 103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO 2,522.25 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 324159 APPL 1 5200.1727 2,522.25 375372 911212013 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. - 767.77 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 323486 090313 1190.6104 Subledger Account Description FIRST AID SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 28 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LAUNDRY ARENA CONCESSIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS TRAINING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GOLF DOME COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATH GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET . . CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 767.77 - 375373 9/1212013 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 2,969.50 326.30 3,232.10 382.30 2,375.60 789.20 765.90 10,840.90 375374 9112/2013 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 230.03 2,988.63 . 129.12 612.48 1.12 815.49 4,776.87 375375 911212013 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 12,092.30 3,270.28 2,463.65 181.07 11,409.32 1,935.92 1,136.00 5,013.80 1,095.15 185.15- 12,160.01 1,383.00 51,955.35 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9112/2013 - 9/12/2013 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 29 323636 338677 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 323637 338534 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 323638 338799 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 323639 339126 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 323640 338901 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 323641 339133 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 324089 339128 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 323642 469103 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 323643 469947 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 323644 469945 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 324090 469876 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 324091 469875 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 324092 469944 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 323645 1080080614 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 323646 1080080551 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 323647 1080080549 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 323648 1080080550 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 323649 1080078147 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 323650 1080080615 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 323651 1080078148 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 323652 1080078141 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 323653 1080078144 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 323654 2080015335 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 324093 1080080548 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 324094 1080080552 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 375376 9112/2013 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 464.40 323487 1090102418 5421.5514 76.50 323655 1090102415 5822.5514 971.40 323656 1090103467 5862.5514 107.50 323657 1090103469 5862.5514 2,943.20 323658 1090103468 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/12/2013 - 9112/2013 9/11/2013 7:46:57 Page - 30 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,531.40 323659 1090103470 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,771.05 323660 1090102414 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,099.14. 324095 1090105848 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,487.20 324096 1090105846 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 120.00 324097 1090105847 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 120.00 324098 1090105844 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 131.60 324099 1090105845 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,496.57 324100 1090105843 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 30.00- 324101 2090029466 .5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 24,289.96 375377 911212013 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,987.25 FRANCE AVE PED CROSSINGS 323452 16 -01686 -300 01404.1705.20• CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 6,063.50 HAZELTON RD FINAL DESIGN 323488 2- 01686 -460 01417.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS 142.00 HAZELTON RD FEASIBILITY STUDY 323489 4- 01686.400 01417.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS 1,710.50 GATEWAY AUAR UPDATE 323710 5- 01686 -370 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 9,903.25 375379 911212013 101726 XCEL ENERGY 34,617.56 51- 4621797 -2 323453 381113919 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 7,297.02 51- 6121102 -5 323454 381556022 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.61 51- 8102668 -0 323490 381173614 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 7,163.49 51- 0837548 -4 323491 381578584 5915.6185 LIGHT &'POWER WATER TREATMENT 1,301.24 51- 5634814 -2 323492 381490308 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 252.73 51- 5938955 -6 323493 381325550 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 421.76 51- 9422326 -6 323494 381710479 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 783.17 51- 9251919 -0 323495 381369331 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 36.43 51- 4151897 -6 323496 381467371 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 37.90 51- 7567037 -0 323497 381523209 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 198.48 51- 9337452 -8 323498 381380309 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 10,317.71 514827232 -6 323499 381310838 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 1,224.20 51- 6979948 -4 323526 381677691 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,806.17 51- 69799484 323526 381677691 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 2,238.32 51- 69799484 323526 381677691 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 739.20 51- 6229265 -9 323527 381499712 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 2,035.05 51- 6229265 -9 323527 381499712 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 766.84 51- 6137136 -8 323528 381829222. 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 33,477.97 51- 4888627 -1 323529 381807216 5511:6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 397.24 51- 6046826 -0 323530 381327100 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 8,472.33 51- 9603061 -0 323531 381379118 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 65.36 51- 0010033667 -7 323560 381203278. 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT CITY OF EDINA 9111/2013 7:46:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 9/12/2013 — 9/12/2013 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,168.16 514966303 -6 323711 381812696 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 9,644.03 51- 6824328 -7 324021 382191469 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 2,652.66 51- 6121102 -5' 324022 381994697 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 128,053.63 375380 911212013 130600 YOUNG WOODCRAFT 429.10 REPAIR BROKEN TEE BOXES 323712 110 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 429.10 375381 9112/2013 101091 ZIEGLER INC 1,283.31 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 323455 SW140133899 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,283.31 1,974,013.51 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,974,013.51 Total Payments 1,974,013.51 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 911112013 7:49:15 Council Check Summery Page - 1 9/12/2013 - 9/12/2013 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 423,390.02 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,582.41 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 64,616.49 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 77,996.99 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,509.05 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 554,884.34 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 11,840.45 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,195.85 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 63,848.80 05600 DNU OLDEDINBOR /CENT LAKES FUND 150.00 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 29,380.52 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 6,208.23 05800 LIQUOR FUND 246,271.80 05900 UTILITY FUND 447,681.48 05930 STORM SEWER FUND .18,794.76 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,195.96 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 65.36 Report Totals 1,974,013.51 we confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polic es nd nrocedures daO (� 4 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13- 07/25/13 Account Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/07/08 $32.20 Food CUB FOODS #4974 EAGAN MN 1170.6106 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/07/09 $38.24 Food BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE EDINA MN 1170.6106 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/07/10 $100.00 HOTELS ARROWWOOD RESORT CALEXANDRIA MN 1170.6104 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2013/07/10 $100.00 HOTELS ARROWWOOD RESORT CALEXANDRIA MN 1170.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/06/28 $47.52 Food JERRY'S FOODS EDINA MN 1470.6106 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/06/28 $52.45 Food LIONS TAP EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1470.6106 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/06/28 $40.00 Uniforms LANDS END BUS OUTFITTE 800 - 587 -1541 WI 1470.6558 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/06/27 $193.85 Office Supplies B &N BOOKST MINN -ST -U# 507- 389 -1649 MN 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/04 $228.52 Personal- repaid ALAMO RENT -A -CAR LAS VEGAS NV 1470.6106 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/05 $436.80 Personal- repaid MONTE CARLO FRONT DE: LAS VEGAS NV 1470.6106 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/07 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/12 $939.50 Supplies BATTERY UNIVERSE 208 - 347 -2745 ID 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/15 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/15 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/15 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/15 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1470.6188 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/22 $3.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTAMZN.COM /BILL WA 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/22 $4.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT AMZN.COM /BILL WA' 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/22 $15.80. Ground commercial THE UPS STORE. 1715 EDINA MN 1470.6103 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/23 $20.65 OTHER AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/23 $35.40 Wad Accessory APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE 800 - 676 -2775 CA 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2013/07/23- $214.54 Office Supplies STAPLES 00119180 BLOOMINGTON MN 1470.6406 * *0127 KAREN KURT 2013/07/15 $103.69 Books INDEPENDENT PUBLISHER 312- 337 -0747 IL 1120.6405 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/10 $94.23 Food SALUT BAR AMERICAIN EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/03 $25.31 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/01 $64.82 Food GOOD EARTH I EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/03 $33.28 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/03 $40.19 Food BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/09 $30.94 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 G: \Purchasing cards \2013 purchasing card electronic files \2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 8/29/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13- 07/25/13 Account Account Name . Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/10 $25.00 OFFICE SERVICES ICMA INTERNET' 800 - 745 -8780 DC 1120.6104 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/10 $71.08 Food SALUT,;BAR'AMERICAIN EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/12 $30.75 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/15 $93.72 Cell phone SPRINT *WIRELESS 800 - 639 -6111 KS 1120.6188 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2013/07/22 $57.30 Food RAKU JAPANESE REST EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/06/28 $32.16 Food BRUEGGERS #21 EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/06/28 $17:18 Food DAIRY QUEEN 111605 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1120.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/06/27 x$60.08 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN, 1120.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/07/11 $89.34 Food PAN ERA, BREAD #1315 EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/07/15 $135.52 Food PINSTRIPES 847 - 4802323 MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/07/16 $167:71 "Food -- D'AMICO.& SONS /EDINA .EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/07/23 $89.27 Food D'AMICO & SONS /EDINA EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *8738 SUSAN HOWL 2013/07/23 $149.98 DISPUTED TRANSACTWALGREENS #13753 EDINA MN 1120.6406 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/06/27 $505.00. - Business Expense GOVERNMENT FINANCE C 312 - 977 -9700 IL 1160.6103 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/07/02 $19.95 Transaction -fee PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -9770 TX 1550.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/07/02 $18.25 Transaction. fee PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888- 883 = 9770" TX 1550.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2013/07/03 $50.00 Registration MINNESOTA GOVERNMEP 651-7927036 MN. 1160.6104 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/07/18: .$.214.60 License VUE *LICENSING 800- 274 -3444 MN 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/07/18 $85.64 Books W1NWjMYBOOKORDERS C 866 - 7974314 MN 1190.6406 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/07/22 $501:80 Subscription D J *WALL ST JOURNAL 800- 568 -7625 MA 1190.6105 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2013/07/24 $214.60 License VUE *LICENSING 800- 274 -3444 MN 1190.6105 * *0101 WAYNE.HOULE 2013/07/10 $46.53 Postage ,. USPS 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1260.6406 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/07/-10 $43.56 Postage USPS- 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 01406.1705.31 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/07/10 $44.88 Postage USPS - 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS' MN 01410.1705.31 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/07/10 $30.03 Postage USPS 2663270433340990 - MINNEAPOLIS MN 01411.1705.31 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/07/10 $5.11 Postage USPS 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 01407.1705.31 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/07/10 $5.12 Postage USPS 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 01408.1705.31 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/07/10 $25.08 Postage USPS 2663270433340990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 01409.1705.31 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2013/07/16 $45.04 Office=Supplies STAPLES -00119180 BLOOMINGTON MN 1260.6406 G: \PL ,sing cards \2013 purchasing card electronic files \2013 USF rchasing Card Register.xlsx )/2013 Account Account Name 'I Date * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2013/06/26 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWP2013 /07/10 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWP2013 /07/09 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWP2013 /07/09 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAWP2013 /07/09 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2013/07/02 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON 2013/07/02 * *6999 DAN MCMAHON, 2013/07/22 * *_6999 DAN MCMAHON 2013/07/24 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN 2013/07/10 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN 2013/07/17 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN ! 2013/07/17 * *7005 DAVE GOERGEN j 2013/07/17 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2013/07/05 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2013/07/05 * *.7013 GARY WELLS 2013/07/08 * *7013 GARY WELLS 2013/07/22 * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2013/07/01 * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2013/07/03 * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2013/07/17 * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2013/07/18 * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2013/07/18 * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2013/07/18 * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2013/07/19 * *9221 JEFF LONG 2013/06/27 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/06/18 * *7804 JEFF LONG 2013/06/21 * *9221 JEFF LONG 2013/07/23 * *9221 JEFF LONG 2013/07/23 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13- 07/25/13 Amount Description Merchant Name City $532.24 Blade Guard MCCLELLANS TOOL PRO D BLAINE ($70.00) Registration U OF M CCE NONCREDIT SAINT PAUL $257.39 Vehicle Expense SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA $57.90 Vehicle Expense SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA $26.81 Vehicle Expense SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA $94.80 License DEPARTMENT OF LABOR f 651- 2845528 $74.70 Signs /Supplies SMARTSIGN 7187971900 $74.80 License DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 1 651 - 2845528 $1,049.00 Charger AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTAMZN.COM /BILL $245.00 Registration PAYPAL *MINNESOTASE 402 - 935 -7733 $53.61 Supplies WALGREENS #3114 EDINA $144.75 Supplies JO -ANN ETC #2026 EDINA $176.92 Supplies JO -ANN ETC #2026 EDINA $206.54 Manhole Cover Cush USA BLUE BOOK 800- 493 -9876 $169.93 Disposable Gloves WW GRAINGER 877 - 2022594 $52.16 Battery WW GRAINGER 877 - 2022594 $33.05 Radial Bearing WW GRAINGER 877 - 2022594 $44.10 Vehicle Expense SUPERAMERICA 4718 NORTH MANKATO $145.68 Lodging BEST WESTERN N MANKATO $95.00 Training Seminar TAC TEAM 805 - 488 -8381 $350.00 Registration PAYPAL *TAPE 402 - 935 -7733 $395.00 Conference -Lynn SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR 407- 3043448 $395.00 Conference -Ryan SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR 407- 3043448 $195.00 Registration HTC CUSTOM TRAINING 952 - 9951300 $29.99 Food BYERLY'S EDINA EDINA ($537.41) Supplies SCHATZLEIN SADDLE 63 612 - 825 -2459 ($63.80) Pool testing supplies. TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES IP 410 - 4724340 $30.00 Supplies RALPHS SHOE SERVICE RICHFIELD $85.81 Flash Drive MICRO CENTER #045 RET/ ST LOUIS PARK GAPurchasing cards \2013 purchasing card electronic files \2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx State Account M N 1301.6556 MN 1281.6104 M N 1552.6406 MN 1314.6406 MN 1314.6406 M N 1240.6105 NY 1552.6406 M N 1240.6105 WA 1553.6585 CA 5919.6104 MN 5913.6406 MN 5913.6406 MN 5913.6406 IL 5923.6406 PA 5923.6610 PA 5913.6406 PA 5921.6530 M N 1400.6107 MN 1400.6104 CA 1400.6104 CA 1400.6104 FL 1400.6104 FL 1400.6104 MN 1400.6104 M N 1400.6104 M N 1400.6406 M D 5952.6406 M N 1400.6104 M N 1400.6160 8/29/2013 Account * *1996 * *1996 * *1996 * *1996 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *8753 * *5546 * *5546 * *5546 * *5546 * *5546 * *5587 * *5587 * *5587 * *5587 Account Name Date GUNNAR KAASA 2013/07/10 GUNNAR KAASA 2013/07/11 GUNNAR KAASA 2013/07/15 GUNNAR KAASA 2013/07/18 RYAN BROWNING 2013/06/26 RYAN BROWNING 2013/06/26 RYAN BROWNING 2013/06/26 RYAN,BROWNING 2013/06/26 RYAN BROWNING 2013/06/26 RYAN BROWNING 2013/06/26 RYANBROWNING 2013/07/10 RYAN BROWNING 2013/07/11 RYAN•BROWNING 2013/07/11 RYAN BROWNING 2013/07/11 RYAN BROWNING 2013/07/10 -RYAN BROWNING 2013/07/10 RYANBROWNING 2013/07/12 RYAN BROWNING 2013/07/15 RYAN BROWNING 2013/07/15 RYAMBROWNING 2013/07/22 KRISTIN AARSVOLD2013 /06/26 KRISTIN AARSVOLD2013 /07/01 KRISTIN AARSVOLD2013 /01/03 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2013/07/17 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2013/07/22 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/01 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/08 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/09 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/09 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13- 07/25/13 Amount Description Merchant Name City $127.25 Dues /Membership AMERICAN PUBLIC WORK: DAN.PAVLICH @C $279.16 AOTO /RV DEALERS FELDMANN IMPORTS BLOOMINGTON $96.52 Supplies SPRINT STORE #1558 EDINA $199.00 Dues /Membership AMERICAN PUBLIC WORK: DAN.PAVLICH @C $119.10 iPad Accessory :AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTAMZN.COM /BILL $74.86 Phone Chargers AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT AMZN.COM /BILL $53.99 IT Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT AMZN.COM /BILL $50.63 IT Supplies AMAZON-MKTPLACE PMT AMZN.COM /BILL $43.28 IT Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTAMZN.COM /BILL $583.22 IT Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT AMZN.COM /BILL $36.38 Wireless Mouse AMAZON MKTPLACE'PMTAMZN.COM /BILL $790.00 Conference SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR 407 - 3043448' - $622.40 Lodging SHERATON HOTELS GREED GREENSBORO $622.40 Lodging . SHERATON HOTELS GREED GREENSBORO $454.60 Airfare USAIRWAYS` 037232065C800-428-4322 $454.60 Airfare USAIRWAYS 037232065C800-428-4322 $203.74 Cables BEST BUY MHT 00006114 EDEN PRAIRIE $622.77 iPad Accessories AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTAMZN.COM /BILL $14.98 iPad Accessories . AMAZON MKTPLACE PMT AMZN.COM /BILL $45.23 IT Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PARK $61.07 Supplies TARGET 00023135 1 EDINA $20.55 WHOLESALE TRADE JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAR EDINA $8.56 Drycleaning HALLMARK CLEANERS E EDINA $12.83 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA $22.46 Paint Pail JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAR EDINA $228.00 Field Trip PARADISE CHARTER CRUD 952- 474 -8949 $20.54 Food LUNDS #2 EDINA $21.42 Supplies MICHAELS #3739 BLOOMINGTON - $3.19'-.Supplies MICHAELS #3739 BLOOMINGTON State Account MO -1280.6105 MN 1553.6180 MN 1553.6406 MO 1553.6103 WA 1140.6406 WA 1400.6188 WA 1554.6406 WA 1554.6406 WA 1554.6406 WA 1554.6406 WA 421260.6710 FL 2310.6104 NC 2310.6104 NC 2310.6104 AZ 2310.6104 AZ 2310.6104 MN 1554.6406 WA 1495.6406 WA 1495.6406 MN 1554.6406 MN 1624.6406 MN 1624.6406 MN 1627.6103 MN 1624.6406 MN 1624.6406 MN 1624.6406 MN 1624.6406 MN 1624.6406 MN 1624.6406 G: \Pi ising cards \2013. purchasing card electronic files\2013 USr rchasing Card Register.xlsx 1/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13- 07/25/13 Account Account Name Date Amount Description ; Merchant Name City State Account * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/11 $60.30 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/10 $123.00 Field Trip? WALKER ART CENTER GEK 612 - 375 -7600 MN 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/15 ($135.52) DISPUTED TRANSACT PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/15 $102.86 Supplies PARTY CITY #764 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/15 $71.94 Supplies JO -ANN ETC #2026 EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/16 $451.00 Field Trip GRAND SLAM SPORTS 952 - 224 -0414 MN 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/17 $345.26 Supplies ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800 - 2280475 NE 1624.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2013/07/22 $11.20 Supplies MICHAELS STORES 3739 BLOOMINGTON MN 1624.6406 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2013/06/27 $415.07 Rental ULTIMATE EVENTS INC PLYMOUTH MN 1627.6406 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2013/07/22 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAYAUTOPA 888- 294 -6804 CA 1600.6188 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/06/27 $203.71 Tennis Program BANNERS TO GO 612 - 9252883 MN 1623.6406 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER, 2013/06/27 $90.00 Backpack BAGSINBULK.COM 888 - 758 -2247 NY 1513.6218 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/06/29 $52.34 Supplies POSTERS ON BOARD MINNEAPOLIS MN 1628.6406 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 2013/06/29 $82.58 Supplies POSTERS ON BOARD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 1628.6406 * *4509 DONNA TILSNER 1 2013/07/11 ($26.81) Key Cabinet THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1628.6406 * *4509 DONNA TILSNEW 2013/07/13 $74.36 Supplies MINNEAPOLIS LOCK AND MINNEAPOLIS MN 1628.6406 * *4509 DONNA TILSNERI 2013/07/11 $26.81 Key Cabinet THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1628.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/02 ($128:72) Television TARGER 00021899 ST LOUIS PARK _ MN 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER. BENNER( 2013 /07/02 $20.00 Data Plan- Jennifer VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888- 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/05 $53.63 Software ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE,R(2013 /07/06 $53.63 Software ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/08 .$30.00 Job Post on MNPR bl PAYPAL *RYAN 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1130.6122 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/,08 $5.00 Subscription THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCU 612 - 6734343 MN 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER(2013 /07/10 $17.97 Equipment Rental CINEQUIPT MINNEAPOLIS MN 1130.6410 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/11 $20.00 Data Plan -Scott VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/13 $510.00 Wellness NIKE.COM 800 - 806 -6453 OR 1513.6218 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/11 $10.00 Workshop MAGC 651 - 6754434 MN 1130.6104 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/13 $20.00 Data Plan -J Bennett VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1100.6160 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/16 $25.75 Reference Book BARNES &NOBLE *COM 800 - 843 -2665 NJ 1130.6406 G: \Purchasing cards \2013 purchasing card electronic files \2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 8/29/2013 Account * *2293 * *2293 * *2293 * *2293 * *2293 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8300 * *8318 * *8318 * *8318 * *6428 * *6428 * *6428 * *6428 * *7838 * *7838 * *3792 Account Name Date JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/17 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/17 JENNIFER BENNER(2013/07/18 JENNIFER BENNER( 2013/07/18 JENNIFER BENNER(2013 /07/22 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/06/25 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/06/25 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/06/26 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/06/27 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/06/29 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/06/28 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/06/29 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/07/05 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/07/08 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/07/08 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/07/09 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/07/15 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/07/21 MARY WOOLDRID( 2013/07/24 TOM SWENSON 2013/07/05 TOM SWENSON 2013/07/09 TOM SWENSON 2013/07/18 TODD ANDERSON 2013/06/29 TODD ANDERSON 2013/06/28 TODD ANDERSON 2013/07/19 TODD ANDERSON 2013/07/23 DOUG BAUMAN 2013/06/27 DOUG BAUMAN 2013/07/16 MICHAEL FREY 2013/06/25 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13- 07/25/13 Amount Description Merchant Name City . State Account $20.00 Data Plan - Kaylin VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888- 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 $29.95 Fresh Books 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS 416 - 481 -6946 ON 1130.6103 $184.05 2013 AP Stylebooks U OF M BKSTRS WEBSITE 612 - 625 -5516 MN 1130.6406 $5.00 Software AKSMT.COM 877 - 273 -3049 CA 1130.6124 $20.00 Data Plan -A Swensor VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1100.6160 $23.46 Supplies TARGET 00002204 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5410.6610 $14.58 Advertising FACEBK *YRUD4A632 WWW.FB.ME /CC CA 5410.6122 $1,500.00 Advertising COMCAST SPOTLIGHT CHI 847 - 384 -5000 MI 5410.6122 $10.72 Shipping FEDEX 448387710006031 MEMPHIS TN 5440.6122 $11.66 Shipping FEDEX 795793867236 800 - 4633339 TN 5440.6122 $20.00 Data Plan -Mary VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 5410.6513 $36.73 Advertising FACEBK *3D47E4N532 WWW.FB.ME /CC CA 5410.6122 $13.27 Advertising FACEBK *W6LNC42632 WWW.FB.ME /CC CA 5410.6122 $50.00 Advertising FACE BOO K.COM *SHA952: WWW.FB.ME /CC CA 5410.6122 $200.00 Office Services GOOGLE *ADWS53644071 CC @GOOGLE.COM CA 5410.6122 $34.95 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT #415 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5410.6406 $50.00 Advertising FACEBOOK.COM *41V12A5� WWW.FB.ME /CC CA 5410.6122 $36.35 Advertising FACEBK *NADJD4W532 WWW.FB.ME /CC CA 5410.6122 $150.00 Advertising COMCAST SPOTLIGHT CHI 847 - 384 -5000 MI 5410.6122 $210.00 Radio License FCC 877 - 480 -3201 DC 5410.6105 $223.74 Supplies KELE INC MEMPHIS TN 5410.6406 $74.80 License DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 1651- 2845528 MN 5410.6105 $57.90 Propane SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN 5420.6406 $9.09 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5410.6406 $23.59 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5422.6406 $21.51 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5424.6530 $17.40 Food CUB FOODS EDEN PRAI EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5520.5510 $12.62 Food CUB FOODS EDEN PRAI EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5520.5510 $1,037.62 Advertising IMPRINT COM 281- 786 -3764 TX 5110.6122 G: \PL' )sing cards \2013 purchasing card electronic files \2013 USF rchasing Card Register.xlsx 02013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13- 07/25/13 Account Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2013/06/29 $148.04 Meeting Expense PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 5110.6106 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/07/10 $1,299.49 Supplies ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800- 295 -5510 IL 5421.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/07/10 $857.51 Supplies ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800 - 295 -5510 IL 5420.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/07/10 $226.72 Supplies ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800 - 295 -5510 IL 5410.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/07/10 $8.25 Food LUNDS #3 RICHFIELD MN 5421.5510 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/07/12 $127.77 Catering Supplies FOODSERVICEWAREHOUS 877 - 877 -4379 CQ 5420.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/07/16 $156.70 Liquor EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5420.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2013/07/24 $445.61 Supplies ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800 - 295 -5510 IL 5420.6406 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/07/03 $27.62 Postage PITNEY BOWES* 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5710.6235 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2013/07/23 $100.00 Postage POSTAGE REFILL 800 - 468 -8454 CT 5710.6235 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/04 $100.69 Clothing VISR WWW.VISR.NET NC 5720.5510 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/03 $269.75 Pool COGS ELSMORE SWIM SHOP APPLE VALLEY MN 5310.5510 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/12 $79.24 Clothing VISR WWW.VISR.NET NC 5720.5510 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/17 $50.93 Clothing TARGET 00021899 ST LOUIS PARK MN 5720.5510 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/17 $67.41 Clothing TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5720.5510 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/17 $96.52 Food DQ GRILL &CHILL #41184 EDINA MN 5720.5510 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/18 $11.99 Cake CUB FOODS 43128 EDINA MN 5310.5510 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/18 ($3.32) Food CUB FOODS #3128 SSS EDINA MN 5310.5510 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRAT 2013/07/23 $13.98 Food CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 5310.5510 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/06/25 $13.68 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5761.6406 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/06/26 $128.26 Foliage BACHMAN'S INC #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5761.6620 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/06/26 $28.93 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6406 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/01 $98.08 Paint and Supplies SHERWIN WILLIAMS #314 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6532 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/01 $40.53 Office Supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5760.6513 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/02 $605.19 Paint and Supplies SHERWIN WILLIAMS #314 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6532 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/02 $58.77 Foliage MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5761.6620 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/05 $168.58 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/08 $128.50 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/09 $338.62 Parts MOWPART.COM 877- 306 -3708 TX 5761.6530 G: \Purchasing cards \2013 purchasing card electronic files \2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 8/29/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD:- PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13= 07/25/13 Account Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant. Name City State Account * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/10 $256.66 Foliage MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6620 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/11 $349.75 Paint.and Supplies SHERWIN WILLIAMS #314 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/10 $22.46 Supplies THE.HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6620 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/12 $99.99 Supplies AMAZON- MKTPLACE PMTAMZN.COM /BILL WA 5761.6406 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/17 $128.72 Supplies DICK'S CLOTHING &SPORT RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *6906 ,TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/23 $44.99 _Mulch THE MULCH STORE BURNSVILLE MN 5761.6540 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/23 $491.87 Paint and Supplies SHERWIN WILLIAMS #314. RICHFIELD MN 5761.6532 * *6906 TOM SHIRLEY 2013/07/23 $620.35 Supplies MENARDS 3.297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/06/24 ($4.27) Key Blank JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAR EDINA MN 5861.6406. * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/06/24 $9.33 Supplies BLOOMINGTON SECURIT BLOOMINGTON MN 5821.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/06/24 $9.33 "Supplies BLOOMINGTON SECURIT BLOOMINGTON MN 5841.6406. * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/06/24 $9.34 Supplies BLOOMINGTON SECURIT BLOOMINGTON MN 5861.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/07/16 $209.94, Supplies THE -HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5841.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/07/01 $47.00 Batteries BATTERIES PLUS #16 BLOOMINGTON MN 5861.6530 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/07/02 $23.50 Battery BATTERIES PLUS #16 BLOOMINGTON - MN 5821.6530 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/07/16 $10.32 Supplies MENARDS-3297 RICHFIELD MN 5821.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/07/16 $10.32 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5841.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/07/16 $10.31 .Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5861.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2013/07/16 $56.79 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2805- BLOOMINGTON MN 5861.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/07/01 $291.97 Signs /Supplies SMARTSIGN 7187971900 NY 7411.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/07/01 $83.91 Office Services EMA *EMMA EMAIL MARK 800 - 5954401 TN 7410.6122 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/07/02 $78.17 Signs /Supplies SMARTSIGN 718- 797 -1900 NY 7413.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/07/05 ($25.35) OFFICE SUPPLIES SMARTSIGN 7187971900 NY 7413.6406 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/07/10 $26.52 Office Services GOOGLE *ADWS51076681 CC @GOOGLE.COM CA 7410.6122 * *7021 DEB FIELDS. 2013/07/19 $16.09 Food. DQ GRILL &CHILL #41184 EDINA MN 7410.6106 * *7021 DEB FIELDS 2013/07/21 $25.84 Office Supplies. OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 7410.6513 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/01 $4.60 Auto Supplies OREILLY AUTO 00032482 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/03 $3.73 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/04 $72.39 Supplies MENARDS 3268. EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 G:\PL: ising cards \2013 purchasing card electronic files \2013 USA rchasing Card Register.xlsx 1/2013 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 06/26/13- 07/25/13 Account Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/06 $34.79 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/05 $39.67 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/12 $50.88 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/18 $7.28 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6516 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/22 $66.99 Supplies SP COMPANIES #1 SAINT LOUIS P MN 7411.6530 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/22 $20.80 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *7039 GERALD KOPLOS 2013/07/22 $43.82 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2.812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 # ## # # # # ## We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici s and procedures gA;e G: \Purchasing cards \2013 purchasing card electronic files \2013 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 8/29/2013 I2 : POO RT / IZ : COMMA : NDATION To: MAYOR & COUNCIL 101 L / )itt� Cr 0 Agenda Item #: IV. C. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: September 1.7, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -75 Setting the Hearing Dates for Special Assessments & Utility Certification (10/14/2013) Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: Every year the City holds special assessment public hearings for the purpose of considering the various improvement and maintenance projects undertaken throughout the City of Edina which will be specially assessed against the benefitted property owners. In order to hold the hearing, the' Council must adopt a resolution calling said hearings. Staff recommends that the hearing be set on October 14, 2013, for the following improvements: Aquatic Weeds — Imp. No. AQ -13 Weed Mowing — Imp. No. WD -13 Tree Removal — Imp. No. TR -13 50th & France Improvement M -13 Grandview Square — Improvement G -13 Tracy Ave Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -368 Countryside Neighborhood Roadway Improvement, Improvement No. BA -385 Artic Way, Improvement No. BA -386 Glacier Place, Improvement No. BA-400 Gleason Court, Improvement No. BA -401 Polar Circle, Improvement No. BA -402 Vernon Court and Vernon Hills Court, Improvement No. BA -403 Valley Estates Neighborhood Roadway °'Improvement, Improvement No. BA -387 Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvement, Improvement No. BA -388 The public hearing for the certification of delinquent utilities DU- I should also be set on October 14, 2012 Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -75 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -75 CALLING PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND DELINQUENT UTILITIES ON OCTOBER 14, 2013 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that 'a public hearing shall be held on the 14th day of October, 2013, in the Council`Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment, and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such Improvement will be given an opportunity to, be heard with reference to assessments for the following projects: Aquatic Weeds — Imp. No. AQ -1'3 Weed Mowing — Imp. No. WD -13 Tree Removal — Imp.. No.:TR -13 50th & France — Improvement M -13 Grandview Square— Improvement G -13 Tracy Ave Roadway Improvements,, Improvement No. BA -368 Countryside Neighborhood Roadway Improvement, Improvement No. BA -385 Artic Way, Improvement No. BA -386 Glacier Place, ImprovementkNo. 6A -400 Gleason Court, Improvement No. BA -40.1 Polar-Circle, Improvement. BA -402 Vernon Court t'ancl Vernon Hills Court, Improvement No. BA -403 Valley Estates Neighborhood Roadway Improvement, Improvement No. BA -387 Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood. Roadway,lmprovement, Improvement No. BA -388 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE ClWCOUNCIL;OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 14th day of October, 2013; in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such certification of Delinquent Utilities - DU- 13,.and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such certification will be given an opportunity to be heard. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE.CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that the City Clerk is directed to publish and mail notices of the aforementioned public hearings. Attest: ADOPTED thisl7th day of September 2013 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 17, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 0 , 20_ City Clerk To: Mayor & City Council From: Steve Grausam Director Of Liquor Operations Date: September 17, 2013 Subject: 2012 Ford 12 Ft. Box Truck — Edina Liquor Stores Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 28, 2013 Company: Roseville Midway Ford HGAC Cooperative Purchasing Program Recommended Quote or Bid: Roseville Midway Ford 0 -t A eCe (J) 0 Agenda Item #: I V.D. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget ® NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: Sept. 18, 2013 Amount of Quote or Bid: $28,060 $32,403.14 General Information: This purchase is to replace our existing utility van that is 12 years old and was involved in an accident that damaged one of the rear doors. The van was not on the replacement schedule for 2013 but due to the accident and the cost of repairs being more than the value of the van the liquor stores would like to proceed with replacing it. By purchasing this type of vehicle instead of a cargo van it allows us to wheel product directly into the truck vs us having to load each case by hand. This will allow us to be more efficient when moving product from store -to -store and it will also save employees from using improper body mechanics. This truck will also be available for use in other departments when not in use by liquor stores. /o'� 0 n To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV.E. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: September 17, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -78 Lot Division — 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive /Interlachen Country Club, Michael Gorman Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. 0 0 Information / Background: Mr. Michael Gorman is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides his property at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive and the Interlachen Country Club property. The purpose of the request is to shift the rear lot line of the Gorman property into the golf course property to match a fence line that was installed by a previous property owner of 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive. (See narrative and the proposed lot line shift on pages A4 —A8 of the Plannning Commission staff report.) Planning Commission Recommendation: On September 11, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Lot Division. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2013 -78 o Draft minutes from. the September 1 l,'2013 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, September 11, 2013 City of Edina 4801 W. 501" St. Edina, MN 55424 R :PORT / R : COO MME :�NDATION /o'� 0 n To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV.E. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: September 17, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -78 Lot Division — 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive /Interlachen Country Club, Michael Gorman Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. 0 0 Information / Background: Mr. Michael Gorman is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides his property at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive and the Interlachen Country Club property. The purpose of the request is to shift the rear lot line of the Gorman property into the golf course property to match a fence line that was installed by a previous property owner of 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive. (See narrative and the proposed lot line shift on pages A4 —A8 of the Plannning Commission staff report.) Planning Commission Recommendation: On September 11, 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Lot Division. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2013 -78 o Draft minutes from. the September 1 l,'2013 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, September 11, 2013 City of Edina 4801 W. 501" St. Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-78 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION OF 5100 MIRROR LAKES DRIVE AND INTERLACEN GOLF COURSE WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED See Exhibit A WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels') described as follows: See Exhibit A WHEREAS, the requested lot line adjustment is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina. City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved pursuant to City Code Sections 850 and 810.04 Subd. 2, and further subject, however, to the provision that the NSP easement that runs along the existing side lot line would have to be shifted five feet to the east, and the overhead power lines would have to be moved five feet to the east before issuance of a building permit for a garage addition. Adopted this 17th day of September, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-78 'Page Two CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 17, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk EXISTING DESCRIPTION tt ERTY FOR MICHAEL A.0 ELIZABETH GORMAN ` Lot: 1 ,. Block "2, MIRROR •.LAKES IN EDINA,; Hennepin. 'County,' "Minnesota. ,. 'PROPOSED = PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR "MICHAEL AND ELIZABETH GORMAN :Lot; j; "Block .2,. MIRROR :LAKES ]N-:EDINA, Hennepin County,. Minnesota. AND'. That ";part of "Lot 3 '. Auditors Subdivision. No;' 248; . Hennepin -County, :Minnesota : .described :as,:follows: . Beginning: =at _;the southwest. corner of :Lot 1— Block•• 2;•.:MIRROR'.,LAKES 'IN :'"EDINA,.: "Henne ini;.Coun ; P ty : . .. Minnesota;.,thence';South 01;,degrees.l6.- minutes "T3 seconds East''assumed,:bearing along:itFie west fine `of 1ot.2, Block 1, said MIRROR: LAKES ""IN. "'EDINA" a ;distance �of"25`.1'9 .feet thence ";North 57 . degrees 56:-minutes :05 - seconds. West` a, distance of 24.51 "• feet;'.thence;NorFh 49 `:'degrees ;42 • "minutes 42 seconds: West. a .distance :of-20 82 feeti "thence - North. ':44'`degrees 04'- 'minutes: 03. seconds :West " a` distance .'of 16.66- feet;"thence North. 15 degrees ..50..`minutes "07`:seconds;West i distance ..of `46.49" feet; . thence North 02',degrees 15 :minutes 43 'seconds ".; East `:a distance "=of: 23:95 feet;''thence i - North. 14':degrees 145 minutes '..57 seconds" =West a .distance'of'•67:48 fe6t-- ;thence- :North 70 ;degrees . 18 ;'minutes :'.03'.; seconds ;East "'a "disionce 6f.'78.25. `feet to 'its, intersection ;with ithe west line of 'said i Lot :1; thence .South -00.. :degrees :19" minutes 41• •. seconds "',East "along: the..''west :.line 'of. said.. Lot 1 ;a . . distance of. 54.54: feet; 'thence South :00 .,degrees A 6 minutes 13 :seconds" -East "along" ;the "'west.. line 'said of 'L'ot' 1 a.,distance of 119L00'-feet t'o the,:point of.;.b -:" -ng: - .' t � Area of Parcel A '_ '10,043.8 Sq.. Ft. C C 0.23 .Acres L EXISTING 'PROPERTY DESCRIPTION — INTE'RLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB Lot 3. AUDITOR'S •SUBDIVISION !NO. 2481, C Hennepin sCourty, :Minnesota. • 1. 5 • C PROPOSED :'PROPERTY DESCRIPTION — INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB i Lot '3, - AUDITOR'S SUBDMSION :NO. 248, % `Hennepin: County; :Minnesota. R EXCEPT �C:F• � " C That part of 'Lot 3 Auditors Subdivision No. 2'48, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: O %• C L Beginning at the southwest .comer of Lot 1, Block". 2; "MIRROR LAKES IN ..EDINA, .Hennepin County,- Minnesota; thence South °degrees : °! `+ ; �'.. LL Z 0. 1 16 •.minutes 1"3 seconds'.East' assumed bearing .along ;the•;wesf" line".of,'Lot '2, "Block 1, •said -MIRROR::•LAKES" IN'"EDINA. a distance of :25'.1'9..feef 'thence ,North: " C -57 ; degrees 86'minutes '05 seconds •"West, a ..distance.- "of.•24.51 _feet thence.•North 49'..degrees.�-42 minutes . seconds; West of 20;82: "feet;;thence:;rNorth "44x �S :off; ° y � •42 o`:distance: degrees 04""minutes",03 seconds- West" a distance "of '16.66 '•4eet; thence North -1"5" degrees ".50 minutes 07 ^seconds• West -'a distance of .. � ;3 46.49 feet; . thence :North O2 degrees"' "15. "minutes 43 seconds East .a'" distance - of `23 95 feet thence f� -C North" 14 degrees :;45" minutes 57, seconds{:.West a. distanc6'of:; 67:48;. feet; 'thence --jNorth J0,,degrees 18 ;minutes 03, "seconds._East "'a. distance of..78.i5':;feet.Ad :. its <- intersecti.on."with'`.the- west`iine ofrsaid Lot South .00 , degrees'.19. minutes, :41 ";seconds;' East;dlong', the:: west`'line`'of _saidlllbt'I .- a distance of 54:54!Jeet; Ahence °South 00 :degrees' 16 minutes 13.;seconds .East along -the ,.west: line a of said Lot 1' a distance ';of 119.Oo :feet to the 'point of -beginning. (C ":LL a N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 11, 2013 VILA. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Mr. Michael Gorman is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides his property at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive and the Interlachen Country Club property. (See property location on pages Al A3.) The, purpose of the request is to shift the rear lot line of the Gorman property into the golf course property to match a fence line that was installed by a previous property owner of 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive. (See narrative and the proposed lot line shift on pages A4 —A8.) Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding properties and land uses include single - family homes and the Interlachen golf course, zoned and guided low - density residential (See pages A1— A2.) Existing Site Features Single- family home and the golf course. Planning._. Guide Plan designation: Low- density residential Zoning: R -1, Single- family residential Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. The resulting lot line shift does not create an additional lot. The division makes the existing lot at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive slightly larger, going from`1.41 acres to 1.64 acres. The golf course loses a very small portion of a wooded area of the golf course. (See page A2 and A8.) The division legally establishes the lot line that has been used in practice as a result of the previous property owner's installation of a fence, retaining wall and a portion of a swimming pool on the golf course property. The resulting lots would still be larger than most in the area. The subject property at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive is the largest lot on this portion of Mirror Lakes Drive. (See page Al.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive and the Interlachen Golf Course: Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The division legally establishes the lot line that has been used in practice as a result of the previous property owner's installation of a fence on the golf course property. 3. The resulting lots are still larger than most lots in the area. Deadline for a city decision: November 1, 2013 2 Interactive Property Maps,/ Map 090cE Vd j INTERLACHEN BLVD � I w S w Z . I ^' Highlands Park H /G'HLAA(D LAKE Iw!, f _ 1_ I i (U[]15rasz: - L - i -- - -- - -- - — Parcel 29- 117 -21 -31 -0012 ID: Owner M B Gorman & E L Gorman Name: Parcel 5100 Mirror Lakes Dr Address: Edina, MN 55436 Property Residential Type: Home- Homestead stead: Parcel 1.41 acres Area: 61,226 sq ft 4( Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. N Print Date: 9/5/2013 -t This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 A Think Green! i Interactive L' Maps 1/ f� Parcel 29- 117 -21 -31 -0012 ID: Owner M B Gorman & E L Gorman Name: Parcel 5100 Mirror Lakes Dr Address: Edina, MN 55436 Property Residential Type: Home- Homestead stead: Parcel 1.41 acres Area: 61,226 sq ft 0? V. Property Map Map Scale: 1" ^ 100 ft. /(N Print Date: 9/5/2013 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 A Think Green! �a i Interact1 e IVlap�s , E r, Property Map E A3 tr p k f 1 X „t r. Parcel Map Scale: 1" = 50 ft. N 29.117 -21 -31 -0012 A -T -B: Torrens ID: Print Date: 9/5/2013 Owner M B Gorman & E L Gorman Market $1,659,500 Name: Total: Parcel 5100 Mirror Lakes Dr Tax $26,306.30 Address: Edina, MN 55436 Total: (Payable: 2013) Property Residential Sale $1,390,000 Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Homestead Sale 03/2000 representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 1.41 acres Sale Warranty Deed COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 Area: 61,226 sq ft Code: A 11hink Green! A3 W To: Edina Planning Commission From: Michael and Elizabeth Gorman 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 Re: Lot Division Application (Miinor Lot Line Adjustment) Date: August 25th, 2013 Summary: NCR k A-T/ ufF The Gormans live at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive, legally described as Lot, Block 2, Mirror Lakes in Edina. The Gorman property adjoins Interlachen Country Club (ICC). The parties are seeking a Lot Line Adjustment to reflect the purchase by the Gorman family of .23 of an acre from ICC (Parcel A in the attached documents). A purchase agreement for this transaction has been signed between the parties. Rationale: The purpose of the transaction is for the Gormans to acquire property from ICC which has been encroached upon by a fence installed by the previous owners of the Gorman property. The transaction will facilitate a clear delineation of the parties' respective property interests. 00 A� 5100 MIRROR LAKES ROAD SURVEY FOR: Michael & Elizabeth Go= an Reference JOB: 144 -13 03 10 -04 190 -05 89/53 O 2 L.1 1, BIM L —M -m W ED N..n.Pn C.wlr, W;in.wl.. IwxES eix [0.x� �� xmn<p'n L.unryb4icmn.le. p..l .I b1 B W,d.., 9u.6rubn H.. NC . smm o H BbeB I, gN00N Nx6 iN .eg,eev 9B Mmlea e IO.Bf O. .a lw, , a Wnl wul a ll b<I� QqIu a n ,J ee a %rp�e �.slMnu ea45 >�,cme • Eon o n<,YSon u6inn00 eepee X19 .I 3.3. le nc, swlx 00 Eeq •, Area 01 P .... I A 10,04].8 0.23 A ,. b1 ], AODrtOBS BUB 1- 10. 948, PROP09[0 PPOPEBtt 0Eq[NPMx - xt.9i0x's SuBOmsW . 8 nre . 44 dn C.unIY• ILmoa1.. � -EPT In.l P. 1 .1 .1 � acl.re s.ema,l.. x.. 991 .1 i ao.:'•IM b I9nNtm uus w i aq. 99 IS e� .,in .sll,,mnn.M f19 . L.1 1; In,.q..14 1 W 1.11. I1 '1d1 41 ..I SIBS �h In 00 b9W s1eM..l 119.00 L NORTH E`• ba P repport .,, w , 90P.r S . La n, Sur Minnes,l< W. BROW. L 20 0 20 40 W00draw DOI.d: Scole 1" = 20• fl a"s EXISTING , ,r1ERTY DESCRIPTION FOR MICHAEL AND ELIZABETH GORMAN Lot 1, Block 2, MIRROR .LAKES IN EDINA, Hennepin. County, Minnesota. PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR MICHAEL AND ELIZABETH GORMAN Lot 1, Block .2, MIRROR LAKES IN EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND That .part of Lot 3' 'Auditors Subdivision No. 248, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2, MIRROR. LAKES 1N EDINA, Hennepin .County, Minnesota; thence South D1_. degrees 16'minutes 13 seconds. East assumed bearing along the west tine of Lot:2. Block 1, said MIRROR LAKES IN EDINA a distance of 25.19 feet;. thence North 57' . degrees-56 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of 24.51 feet; thence North 49 degrees 42 .minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 20.82 feet; thence North. 44 degrees 04 minutes 03 ;seconds .West a distance of 16:66 feet: thence North 15 degrees 50 minutes '07 seconds West a distance of 46.49 feet; thence North 02 degrees 15 minutes 43 seconds East '6 distance of 23.95 feet; thence North 14` degrees :45 minutes 57 seconds West a' distance of 67.48 -feet; thence North 70 degrees 18 minutes 03' seconds East a distance of, 78.25 feet to ' its intersection with the west line of said Lot ,1; thence. South 00 .degrees 19 minutes 41 ,seconds East along the west line of said. Lot 1 a distance of 54.54. feet; thence South .00 degrees 16 minutes 13 seconds East along :the west .line of said Lot 1 a distance of 119.00 feet to the .point of, beginning. Area of Parcel A = 10,043.8 Sq. Ft. 0.23 Acres EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION — INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB Lot 3, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 248, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION — INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB Lot 3, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 248, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT That part of Lot 3 Auditors Subdivision No. 248, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the southwest comer of Lot 1, Block 2, MIRROR LAKES IN EDINA, Hennepin County,. Minnesota; thence South 01 degrees 1.6 minutes 1.3' seconds . East' assumed _ bearing along the west line of .'Lot 2, Block 1, said MIRROR LAKES IN EDINA .,a'distance.of 25.19, feet;. thence ,North! 57 degrees 56 minutes 05 - seconds West a distance of 24.51 feet;; thence .North 49. degrees' 42 minutes 42 seconds West b ' distance of 20.82 feet; thence,.:North 44' degrees, 04. minutes .03 seconds West' a distance of 16.66 -feet; thence 'North 15 degrees 50.7 minutes .07 seconds West 'a distance of; 46.49 feet;. thence North 02 degrees' 15 minutes 43 seconds .East a distance of 23.95 feet `thence North 14 degrees 45 minutes 57. seconds, West a distance of 67.48, feet: 'thence North 70 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds- East a distance of 78.25 feet to its intersection with the west line of said Lot`: 1; thence South 00 degrees 19 minutes 41 'seconds East; along , the. west line of said: Lot I. a distance of 54.54 feet; thence South 00 degrees 16 minutes 13 seconds East along the west. line of said Lot 1 a distance of 119.00 feet to the point of beginning. .; LL C a 5100 MIRROR LAKES ROAD S Ulf VE Y FOR: Michael & Elizabeth P.ePe=.o ��.r o s a,Pr4. ro• wK�L Gorman �L=w m m11 onoi• * a ��__ or P-1 A _ 10,043.9 °i--- .__�_ 0.23 Acrr COON i R�Y 5 I `� M, r o I I -.44-10's M.. °. :.e. I l % �,� S _ _,o.----- - - - - -� C `� y II�p a.o,..4 �30Irt N, L� w4'IM — — — _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ ,n...e+nry i]0 1.et MGM ev.l.rry °i Uv .e.l.rry 90.00 I..l. u <. �'p d.i.nc. of 5..5. ie <: in.M pecan i c .\ =N. c.. • r Q �, "� 1 M r 6�,094.�9 5a, fl. I •rep ,LC F� NORTH O o f o NO.75ai • i�v .. c<p. 3 LOT plot / w C K mI 2 ..Pori Lana so. M�nnesolL W. BROW s�. °a J� g i .'�'.'S -� °_v'a•w,s� I 41 ' SIC v °.M wooers. 75 O s N)808.54 °W I ��� Scale 1" = 20, ft s t Reference .1/4 73 r0 -0a JOB: U4-13 190 —OS 89/53 00 5100 MIRROR LAKES ROAD SURVEY FOR: Michael & Elizabeth • Gorman TNTt_kLACH EN couorO 511 . i ,t ,.d w W ] lWx.n SrWwwl w. x.x ...n. �.�.M..d I.a: . �1.. w wr mr u. Sw1. 01 a u lm,ne rn W x. on 1, w w°Slia ulES w I !! M x0�l.µ uw !s :..ma 11x .'— x�� Mm POSE . NNlrrn Kwn Inl al.ie. MvN Ox y.�...! liN rp I.;- W SeNI m .qNY 11 ilWln . n ^ b n ^ }� W Illw. EeNn 00 Myna II Mnulu .1 a•aoa u i�: M , P• olA 10.0438r _�T =� •, W �� z 0.23 k� I z �� W 1. WMOKS AI®�N6d .R x.l --- ----- --- ----------- ------ W ..a..y I wl..M. r•«.Ir. uwMnl. ---------- - --------- ul !, wman almlWnl. In 2u�� E.wr. - I (•p_ .l 11v r�llwM mms .f W ,. N I I �[wl . I c- - / i Reference 126 -03 10 -04 J09: 344 -13 69/17 190 -05 89/53 ...n. �.�.M..d I.a: . �1.. w I rn P . n ^ b n ^ }� W Illw. EeNn 00 Myna II Mnulu .1 a•aoa u i�: co •, W �� z I I z aei.�lel.�`.r ili.00ll.00a m�n. --- ----- --- ----------- ------ W ..a..y xw La hW na.ry w w .nwy — L.I. -------'�. I (•p_ I ^� \` �[wl W V w. na..r xw Ir M l,l /.. X. /. c 1 l.J� << s. NORTH U y_ er p .rY �� 8 W f o I I i2 No•f9.4 I-+.L. Ey. � �C a °, a nor f`♦ _ _ _ / i` S ti o 1 I y9668 I 1 PfOf S;,J \ ?•, b ww w I J �8 f5g '�los. A.E usi!.Kwrt , 1 p1• 6 I.w.. ....._ 913ry „L.•r ... wrb 1 � -... ,.•, r �g r h.n': 'O•�j� ~��_ IY _ � /� :^ -rEltl INE L.RIOIf -�,� I i � �unG` SU / 4innllalc ?} rJ[J. I ° 1 I :� ♦ 0`\� W. BROW. 1 c2 . I♦ 'Z \ $A 20 0 20 W Wooaraw 3 z "1 I ♦ 281 Jy.L a.1 N76-08-,,7,5.W I lv Oolld` �O . I c- - / i Reference 126 -03 10 -04 J09: 344 -13 69/17 190 -05 89/53 VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Lot Division — 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive /Interlachen Country Club Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Michael Gorman is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides his property at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive and the Interlachen Country Club property. The purpose of the request is to shift the rear lot line of the Gorman property into the golf course property to match a fence line that was installed by the previous owner of 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive. Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive and the Interlachen Golf Course subject to the following findings: The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot; the division legally establishes the lot line that has been used in practice as a result of the previous property owner's installation of a fence on the golf course property; and the resulting lots are still larger than most lots in the area. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend lot division approval based on staff findings. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. To: Edina City Council From:. Susie Miller, Braemar Arena General Manager Date: September 17, 2013 ch O IV Agenda Item #: IVY. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Replacement of West Arena Low E Ceiling — Braemar Arena Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: August 20, 2013 Company: Energie Innovation Inc. Custom Ice USA Twin City Acoustics, Inc Recommended Quote or Bid: Energie Innovation Inc. $47,480.00 Amount of Quote or Bid: $47,480.00. (Inc. Demo of Existing Ceiling & Light Fixtures) $51,275.00 (Inc. Demo of Existing) $88,598.00 (Does not include Demo) General Information: The existing Low. Emissivity Ceiling,is panels.that are strung the width of the sheet of ice and supported by cabling. The intent of the Low E Ceiling.is to provide energy efficiency, brighten the space and provide a more appealing look. The Low E Ceiling installed in the West Arena is falling down. In 2011, two-panels were removed because they were hanging down and pucks were getting stuck in them. Since the West Arena is the main rink for high school games, figure skating show, and large special events it is important to replace them one year prior to the 2014 replacement cycle. The existing Low E Ceiling, panels were installed in 1994. We are recommending replacing the existing panels with an Astro -Rink Low Emissivity Ceiling. The Astro- Rink ceiling is reflective insulation and contains two: layers of bubble film that is reinforced with. metalized film on .both. sides. The material is framed in for durability as well as appearance. The bubble insulation material provides an R value and the material is 95% reflective on both sides to provide increased energy efficiency. The three bids received are for comparable products to the Astro -Rink two layer bubble insulation and metalized film on both sides. The Custom Ice USA company offers three products. The EnerShield -DBF coverage is the product that is comparable to the Astro -Rink. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER The Astro -Rink product will provide: • 25% average reduction in refrigeration costs per year • Reduced radian loads to the ice surface • Increased roof insulation • A condensation and drip free arena • 40% increase in light levels • Improved acoustics This is a 2013 CIP item. We have $75,000 budgeted. Attachments: Energie Innovation Inc. Quote Custom Ice USA Quote Twin City Acoustics, Inc. Quote City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 ENERGIE INNOVATION INC. August 20, 2013 Reference: ASTRO -RINK low - emissivity reflective insulated ceiling at the Braemar Arena, Edina, MN West Rink Dear Mrs. Miller, First- of.all, let . me thank you, for your Interest in our revolutionary reflective insulating and low emissivity ceiling products. Energie Innovation is a company that specializes in the supply and installation of reflective insulating materials to the growing market of energy conservation industries, from residential and commercial to industrial and agricultural applications, since 1989. Let me now introduce our ASTRO -RINK product, the best low emissivity ceiling for your arena or curling club projects. ASTRO-RINK reflective insulation is composed of 2 layers of bubble film with reinforced aluminum metalized films on both sides (MPETBubble /Bubble /MPET). These bubbles form trapped air spaces between the aluminum surfaces to give the structure excellent "R" values. Because ASTRO -RINK is also impervious to moisture and air currents, it is an ideal convection and vapor barrier. The material is reinforced to prevent damages caused by pucks and other flying objects; therefore protective netting is not required. Most importantly ASTRO -RINK reflects heat away from your ice surface. You will benefit from: 25 % average reduction in refrigeration costs per year ➢ Reduced radiant loads to the ice surface Increased roof insulation A condensation and drip free arena ➢ 40 %increase in the light levels ➢ Improved acoustics In Addition, the ASTRO -RINK low emissivity ceiling is completely maintenance free for life and all our reflective insulation products arc considered user friendly. Many of our clients have benefited from incentive programs offered by their local utility companies. We at Energie Innovation can help you benefit from these incentives by providing detailed feasibility study analysis for the installation or our ASTRO -RINK reflective ceiling. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time and discovering our revolutionary product. Feel free to visit us on our web site at www.energie- innovation.com and discover the potential for future energy savings and improved skating environment. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information Best regards, Robert Baljak Energie Innovation Inc. ENERGIE INNOVATION iNC. 2970 Halpern Street St- Laurent, QC H4S 1R2, Canada Tel: 514 -334 -3783 Fax: 514 -334 -3925 Date: 20 August, 2013 ESTIMATION No 2013 -617 ame:- - -Braemar Arena Attn: Susie Miller Address: 7501 Ikola Way City: Edina State: MN Zip: 55439 Tel /Fax: T. 952- 833 -9502• F. 952- 833 -9501; smiller EdinaMN. ov Qty Description Unit Price TOTAL USD Project: Astro- Rink low emissivity ceiling installation in the West_ _Rink at the Braemar Arena, Edina, MN Option #1: Standard installation $41,850.00 To supply and install an Astro -Rink low emissivity ceiling in one ice rink. The reflective insulated ceiling will be installed below the steel deck (standard installation). We will cover the area above the ice surface up to the ductwork that runs along both sides of the ice surface and up to 4' outside of the ice surface at the ends of the ice rink. We will also leave an 8" air space along the entire ducts to permit for air circulation. Option #2: Installation suspended 4" below steel deck $46,960.00 To supply and install an Astro -Rink low emissivity ceiling in one ice rink. The reflective insulated ceiling will be suspended 4" below the steel deck. We will cover the area above the ice surface up to the ductwork that runs along both sides of the. ice surface and up to 4' outside of the ice surface at the ends of the ice rink. We will also leave an 8" air space along the entire ducts to permit for air circulation. Ontlon #3: Removal of existing low_ a ceiling $1,680.00 Remove existing cable hung low emissivity ceiling and accessories. The waste container to be provided by the client. Option #4: Removal of existing lights fixtures $3,950.00 Remove existing light fixtures that are no longer in use in the ice rink area (approximately 45). Client must certify that there is no more power connected to the light fixtures before we proceed with removal. The waste container to be provided by the client. Astro -Rink reflective insulation is composed of 2 layers of bubble film with reinforced aluminum metalized films on both sides (MPETBubbleBubble /MPET). Total I USD $ The price quoted for installation of Astro -Rink insulation is as described: Galvanized "U" bars will be used to build up the coiling framework. 'they will be attached to the existing steel deck with the help of HEX head zinc plated self - drilling screws at 4' center to center:" Mis built =up framework will be used to keep the material in place. Permanent support is then ensured by the use of double sided adhesive tape and HEX head zinc plated sharp point screws spaced approximately 18" apart, through the insulation and into the framework. Finally, all seams will be sealed with 3" aluminum tape. The rolls of reflective insulation will run the length of the building. Warranty: S years on labor and lifetime on Astro -Rink material. Price.is valid for 60 days and does not Include taxes if applicable. Price does not include building permit or engineering fees if applicable. Priced using non -union labor. Oi\pberf gusf 20, 205 Robert Baljak Date Energie Innovation Inc. 1051 Clinton SL — Sulte 224 Buffalo, NY 14206 1- 866.887 -8840 Rink Designs Build www.customicerinks.com QUOTATION July 24th, 2013 2 Pages Braemar Arena 7501 Ikola Way Edina, MN 55439 RE: Braemar Arena — Low Emissivity Ceiling The following proposal is for the supply and installation of a Low Emissivity Ceiling at the Braemar Arena in Edina, MN. The ceilings will cover the ice surface and extend approximately 5' outwards on each side. The approximate ceiling coverage will be 95' x 210' with the material installed below the beams following the flat contour of the building structure. Pricing options are listed below for several installation types and materials. The first option is "EnerShield -AD" and shall be suspended on aircraft cable similar to the existing ceiling. A price option is listed to install horizontal netting extending out approximately 50' from the ends of the rink to protect the ceiling from puck damage. The second option is "EnerShield -PR" which is a heavier grade material to protect against errant pucks and is also suspended on aircraft. cable similar to the existing ceiling. The third option is a bubble insulation Low -E fabric, "EnerShield -DBF ", and will be installed on steel channels attached to the roof structure above the rink. The prices include all materials, hardware, labour, manlift rental, insurance and freight for each type of installation. This does not include the ducting of vents, lowering of lights, lowering of fans, or the installation or removal of other arena equipment. A price has also been listed to re move and dispose of the existing ceiling prior to installing a new one on the same trip. The price for 95' x 210' EnerShield -AD coverage .................... ..............................$ 28,650.00 The price for horizontal netting extending to the blue lines in each end .................$ 4,300.00 The price for 95' x 210' EnerShield -PR coverage .................... ..............................$ 40,250.00 The price for 95'x 210' EnerShield -DBF coverage .................. ..............................$ 51,275.00 The price to remove and dispose of the existing Low -F: ceiling ............................$ 3,000.00 Exclusions - Applicable taxes are extra Union or prevailing wages Separate trips for removal of existing ceiling or netting addition Terms - All pricing is in US Funds 50% Deposit, 30% 1 week prior to shipping, 20% Balance upon completion Other Items Subject to Custom Ice Standard Terms and Conditions as approved by Custom Ice Credit staff Thank you. Sincerely, Jake Miller Custom Ice Inc. 2 n Braemer Arena P� con C.) PROPOSAL Date: 9/6/2013 Twin City Acoustics 2655 Cheshire Lane N Plymouth MN 55447 Job Name /Location West Ice Sheet Plans and Specifications by: Architect: - Addends: E Coe-) We propose to furnish the following materials for the above job in accordance with the terns and conditions below. t.ebor and equipment Ibr installation is included unless specifically stated to the contrary . 763- 535 -6697 Fax 763 - 535 -5309: www.tcacoustics.com C MTT--�11� V H Acoustical Ceilings - 09510 Labor and materials to furnish and install an insulation system above ice sheet using the specified sample product, This will be fastened to a grid system. $ 88,598.00 Demo of existing system not included in price Material, labor and sales tax included in price Note: Dumpstets, sweeping, and final cleaning to be fundshed by General Contractor at no cost to Twin Citv Acoustim. Inc. Seismic bracine not included in cost. For the sum of see above S sec above FOB )obsite Delivery as required This proposal is subject to acceptance within 30 days. TERMS: Net cwh payment for 90% of value of materials delivered on job, and labor for installing materials in job during previous 30 day period; shall be due 10'h of following month, balance net cash 30 days after completion. All taxes now or hereafter levied by any federal, state or local authority, upon sale of foregoing materials, am not included in the price and shall be paid by purchaser unless specifically stated otherwise in this proposal. Accepted By: By: Title TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS, INC. By Scott Gallop .NDATIUO N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director. Date: September 17, 2013 Agenda ItemA VI.A. Action 0 Discussion Information Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Resolution No. 2013 -77. Silver Oak Development on behalf of the IRET Properties; Site Plan Review with a parking ramp setback and parking stall Variance at 6525 -45 France Avenue. Action Requested: Approve the attached resolution, which includes conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission Recommendation: On August 28, 2013, a motion to approve the proposed Site Plan and Variances subject to findings and conditions failed on a 4 -5 Vote. (See. attached minutes from the Planning Commission meeting.) Planning Commission concerns included the location and screening of the loading dock, conflict between truck traffic and pedestrian and vehicle circulation, and width of drive entrance /exit from 66th. The applicant has submitted revised plans to address . concerns raised by the Planning Commission. (See attached.) Information /Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision — October 14, 201.3-) Silver Oak Development on behalf of the IRET Properties is proposing to build a four story 60,000 square foot medical office 'expansion, and new parking ramp expansion to the existing 273,000 square foot Southdale Medical Office building located at 6525 -45 France Avenue. The new addition would be located on the south side of the existing building and west of the existing parking ramp. To accommodate the proposed addition, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review. 2. Parking Ramp Setback Variance from 40 and 34.5 feet.to 34.5, 28 and 20 feet for the new parking deck to match the existing parking ramp setback. Differing setbacks are required for the ramp structure because the ramp itself is 34.5 feet tall; and the structure around the stairs is 40 feet tall. 3. Parking Stall Variance from 1,715 spaces to,1,577 spaces. A proof of parking plan for an additional deck could expand parking to 1,749 spaces has been provided. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2013 -77 • Revised Narrative & Plans date stamped September 10, 2013 • Draft minutes from the August 28, 2013, Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, August 28, 2013 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50`h St. • Edina, MN 55424 PLANNING DEPA T IMENIT SEP 10 2013 CITY OF EUNA COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,inc. September 17, 2013 Gity Council and Planning Staff City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Southdale Medical Office Building Dear Council and Staff: At the September 3, 2013 Planning Commission meeting, a few of the Commissioners expressed concern over the items noted below. We offer the following adjustments and clarifications with regards to these items. Architecture Engineering Interiors Planning Preservation L -.Commission expressed concern over the size of the trees at the delivery area screening. We have increased the size of the plantings at this area (see renderings). Additionally, there is a low stone wall and berm at this location, amounting to approximately 3' high, to enhance the landscaping and provide further screening. If the Council feels additional plantings or an increase in the wall or berm height would be beneficial we would be happy to do this. 2. Commission expressed concern over the landscaping along Drew Ave. We are proposing to install all new landscaping and paver walks for the entire length of Drew Ave. We will work closely with the City Arborist to determine what existing trees can be saved. Our preference is to always save "quality old growth trees ". 3. Commission expressed concern over the ability of delivery vehicles to access the delivery area. The mijority of the campus's delivery vehicles are the 30', or less, box truck type vehicles (UPS, coffee, shredding, office supplies, water, linens, etc.) with infrequent deliveries handled by a tractor trailer, 75' or less, (clinic moves, medical equipment, specialized delivery, etc.). We have included in the Council packets diagrams showing how a 30' box truck and 75' semi would access this area. 4. Commission expressed concern about safety and confusion for deliveries, vehicle ramp access and pedestrian access. Currently, deliveries occur throughout the project site at several locations, however the bulk of the delivery traffic currently is using the South lot of the 6545 building and entering the•sitegrbm Wh St. This has created safety concerns for patients and pedestrians accessing the building(s). Early in the design, the team identified the need and desire to consolidate and control the delivery services to a greater degree. Therefore, a single location on the South side of the proposed new building was determined to be the best way to provide better safety and control. Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 t612.332.3654 (332.3626 www .collaborativedesigngroup.com ti DEP 1�6itj B SEP 10 2013 (V Additionally, the building management has in place delivery policies that preclude large deliveries from occurring during active hours. As noted in the Southdale Medical Center Rules and Regulations; After initial occupancy, movement in or out of the building of furniture or office equipment, or dispatch or receipt by Lessee of any bulky material, merchandise or materials which required use of elevators or stairways, or movement through the building entrances or lobby will be restricted to weekends and between the hours of5:00 p.m. and 7.00 a.m. on weekdays. " `Such pre- arrangement initiated by Lessee will include determination by Lessor, and subject to its decision and control............ " 5. Commission expressed concern over the width of the new entrance at the South side of the site. The existing entrance configuration at the South side of the site includes two separate entrances, one in /out access and one right in only. We are proposing to eliminate both of these entrances and provide a new "right in, right out" divided entrance. This provides us with the greatest amount of safe traffic flow, for both vehicles and pedestrians. We feel this is a safer condition because pedestrians have to be concerned about one direction of traffic from each crossing only. However, if the Council feels a single undivided entrance that accommodates both in and out traffic with out division is better, we would be happy to do this. V truly } C' laboratil es O'Shea Principal | ) � / \ ^ .� -` 7 ' loop Parking Ramp City of Edina Council Presentation | | | | || | || NN RFjT INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST /| r ti SEP 10 2013 IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST MM i m F� LC,t fir -' r�. /,�.• ' c is S j -� 1 ; IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST SEP l) 2013 Ir Ff IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST lrr/ Q D O, U" U U� (a) QD Q N U L.L a 66th Street n L7 SEP 10 2013 7 QD Q Di i IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST J InwM i f i� {7`7{i•yr� rw1�� K• �M11H lCC y. t � - •r ra.r. '�I IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST Existing Parking Spaces Required Parking Spaces Based on New Office Building Proposed Parking Spaces 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Parking Statistics SEP 10 2013 1 �S ti rn rr .� w►. .- �rer c I IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST View from 66th Street SEP 10 2013 r_ r. . r' IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST View from 66th Street SEP 10 2013 :;tMrc•rwr . rr .• rE �f r r.,+r ^ . 1 ' .1�"lrr��► s IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST If View from 66th Street SEP 10 2013 IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST ' r C � 1 IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST View from 66th Street SEP 0 2013 IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST c r � .. ,.► i . e IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST c Aerial from Drew Avenue r rr Iry Ps . vh; *.. .- at IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUS- View from Drew Avenue SEP 10 2013 ,; 4q Tt t� IYwri/M F� Wrf t. If. lit � IM tt rl lti i �.Ia /1 ♦.R sR r �+ �,�v� h r` • F trrr IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST 4 View from Drew Avenue SEP 10 2013 CP ... . tr nrn 1 %JC ML IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST View from 65th Street SEP 10 2013 .1 r� T• f r .�• \�r.�Y . k•.I�.rn h rf yv rl pss M h rw.r� IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST 4 Aerial from 66th Street t r, :ii�l:n rrF• I �_ IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST t SEP 10 2013 0 n' r IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST S E P 10 2013 r .r f � i i r IRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST 111111111 A 7- A jr, L ----------- ------------ . . . ......... . m - ----------- - 4 ..On K— 06M, B910W, 0 30 60 re COLLABORATIVE �tm =I— Z E w U (D 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction OVERALL LANDSCAPE L200 E>--. E>=-- — il> ii - 4 ..On K— 06M, B910W, 0 30 60 re COLLABORATIVE �tm =I— Z E w U (D 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction OVERALL LANDSCAPE L200 21 RESOLUTION NO: 2013 -77 H RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCES AT 6525 -45 FRANCE AVENUE TO BUILD A 60,000 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION AND PARKING RAMP EXPANSION FOR THE SOUTHDALE MEDICAL OFFICE CAMPUS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Silver Oak Development on behalf of the IRET Properties is proposing to build a four story 60,000 square<foot medical office expansion, and new parking ramp expansion to the existing 273 ;000 square foot Southdale Medical Office building located at 6525 -45 France Avenue. 1.02 To accommodate the proposed addition, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review. 2. Parking Ramp Setback Variance from 40 and 34.5 feet to 34.5, 28 and 20 feet for the new parking deck to match the existing parking ramp setback. (See page A16a.) Differing setbacks are required for the ramp structure because the ramp itself is 34.5 feet tall; and the structure around the stairs is 40 feet tall. 3. Parking Stall Variance from 1,715 spaces to 1,577 spaces. A proof of parking plan for an additional deck could expand parking to 1,749 spaces has been provided. The property is legally described as follows: See attached. 1.02 With the exception of the requested Variances, the proposed plans meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance Requirements. 1.03 On August 28, 2013, a motion to approve the proposed Site Plan and Variances subject to findings and conditions failed on a 4 -5 Vote by the Planning Commission. 1.04 The applicant submitted revised plans to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission. Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the parking space and ramp variances. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 RESOLUTION NO. 2013- Page Two 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses. 3. The variances are reasonable. As mentioned, the setbacks for the parking ramp expansion, match the existing setbacks: The parking study concludes that the proposed addition and existing uses on the site would be supported by the existing parking facilities. Traditionally; the City of Edina has not required parking stalls, when they are not needed. ,Additional parking could be provided by adding levels to the existing parking ramps if needed. 4. The parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approval of the Site. Plan and Variances at 6525 -45 France Avenue for Silver Oak Development on behalf of IRET Properties. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site.must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following, plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped .July 26, 2013 & September 10, 2013. • Grading,plan date stamped.July 26, 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped July 26, 2013 & revised on September 11, 2013 • Lighting plan date stamped July 26, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped July 26, 2013 & September 10, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Trees planted in front of the loading dock shall be 12 feet tall at the time of planting. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. RISOLUTION NO. 2013- Page Two 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo -dated August 22, 2013. 6. Should delays and queuing become an issue at the France Avenue/ 65 Street intersection in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 7. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. 8. The driveway entrance/ exit off 66th shall be reduced in width subject to review and approval of the plans by the city engineer at the time of building permit approval. 9. The applicant must enter into a proof of parking agreement with the City to ensure the necessary parking space will be provided if needed. Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof of parking stalls constructed by adding the addition to the parking ramp. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on September 17, 2013. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 17, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013 City Clerk Exhibit A TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1728, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. AND TRACT B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 1728, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. AND THE EAST 2 1/2 ACRES OF LOT 1, "CASSIN'S OUTLOTS ". ALL BEING SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD, IF ANY. A@ Commissione rabiel asked Planner Teague what the zoning classifica ' is on the properties to the west. elNe responded that the zoning classification fort adjacent properties to the west is PID, Plan ne dustrial District, with the City of Bloomiq on also to the west. Commissioner Carr asked t applicant if the variance s approved does he plan on re- landscaping the site. Mr. KelI responded in th firmative, adding a retailing wall, new sod and plantings will be added. Public Hearing Chair Staunton asked if anyon ,p4ould like Apeak to the item; being none, Commissioner Grabiel moved to close thporublic hearing. Co \based s seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing clo Motion Commis ' ner Grabiel moved variance approff findings and su bject to staff cond' ns. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. C. Site Plan with Variances. Paul Reinke /Oak Development. 6545 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Silver Oak Development on behalf of the IRET Properties is proposing to build a four story 60,000 square foot medical office expansion, and new parking ramp expansion to the existing 273,000 square foot Southdale Medical Office building located at 6525 -45 France Avenue. The new addition would be located on the south side of the existing building and west of the existing parking ramp. Teague stated to accommodate the proposed addition, the following is requested; Site Plan Review., Parking Ramp Setback Variance from 40 and 34.5 feet to 34.5, 28 and 20 feet for the new parking deck to match the existing parking ramp setback. Differing setbacks are required for the ramp structure because the ramp itself is 34.5 feet tall; and the structure around the stairs is 40 feet tall and a parking stall Variance from 1,715 spaces to 1,577 spaces. A proof of parking plan for an additional deck could expand parking to 1,749 spaces has been provided. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for the Southdale Medical building expansion based on the following findings: Page 3 of 14 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the parking space and ramp variances. 2. W.SB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing . roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses. 3. The variances are reasonable. As mentioned, the setbacks for the parking ramp expansion, match the existing setbacks. The parking study concludes that the proposed addition and existing uses on the site would be supported by the existing parking facilities. Traditionally, the City of Edina has not required parking stalls, when they are not needed. Additional parking could be provided.by adding levels to the existing parking ramps if needed. 4. The parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. Approval of the Site Plan is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must.be developed and maintained insubstantial conformance with the following plans, _unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date,staniped July 26, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped July 261 2013: • Landscaping plan date stamped July 26, 2013. • Lighting plan date stamped July 26; 2013. • Building elevations_ date stampedJ,uly 26; 2013. • Building materials'board as presented at the Planning Commission and City'Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount. for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek. Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to.meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated August 22, 2013. 6. Should delays and queuing become an issue at the France Avenue /65 Street intersection in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 7. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. Page 4 of 14 8. The applicant must enter into a proof of parking agreement with the City to ensure the necessary parking space will be provided if needed. Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof of parking stalls constructed by adding the addition to the parking ramp. Appearing for the Applicant Paul Reinke Discussion Commissioner Carpenter asked. Planner Teague who determines the "share" a business pays for street improvements. Chuck Rickart.addressed the question and explained that the cost a business pays for street improvements, is determined by a sliding scale process taking into account the size of the expansion including the change in traffic patterns, increase in trip generations; etc. Rickart pointed out in this area; especially on this corner (West 65th Street) there are a number of players that would be responsible for the improvements, pointing out each "corner" is and or will be undergoing expansion. With regard to the Proof of Parking (POP) agreement recommended in the staff report Commissioner Carpenter asked what triggers it. Planner Teague explained that Edina Ordinance indicates that the City Manager is the "body" that determines if the POP should be implemented. Commissioner Grabiel asked Teague if he recalls the City Manager initiating a POP. Teague responded to date he's.not aware of any POP agreement(s) that have been implemented at the request of the City Manager. Most businesses police themselves. Commissioner Forrest indicated she is hesitant to support the loading dock in the new location. Continuing, Forrest also questioned how the traffic analysis calculated vehicle trips. Mr. Rickart responded that the parking analysis viewed this site as a medical use site. Forrest pointed out the site is also planned for retail. Rickart responded a small retail component was-also included in the calculations (Regional Medical with Retail Component), adding the majority of medical uses including hospitals operate some form of onsite retail. Commissioner Potts asked Planner Teague who reviews the internal traffic circulation on the plans. Teague responded that the City Engineer reviews all internal vehicle movements. Commissioner Schroeder asked Mr. Rickart if he believes the ingress /egress is necessary at 48- feet, adding it's rather wide. Schroeder commented that in his opinion safety in pedestrian navigation is important and would be compromised with 48 -feet of lane(s) to navigate. Commissioner Carr referred to the landscaping plan and suggested that the applicant take another look at it and plant trees taller than indicated. Planner Teague commented that the Page 5 of 14 • e? tI proposed landscaping plan exceeds ordinance; however, the Commission can request extra, taller plantings because of the need for a variance. Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if he knows what the zoning is on the opposite side of the street (Drew). Planner Teague responded the zoning on the east side of Drew is also Regional Medical (RMD). Applicant Presentation Paul Reinke addressed the Commission and introduced the development team, Gail , property manager and James O'Shea, architect. Mr. Reinke said they were very excited about the proposed expansion. Mr. O'Shea addressed the comments on the loading dock and explained the existing facility doesn't have a "true" loading dock area and the goal of this design is to have one consolidated loading dock for the entire site. O'Shea said the new design can incorporate two semi - trailer loading berths and 1 small loading berth for the smaller delivery vehicles. Continuing, O'Shea further explained with regard to the proposed drive aisle width that it was felt that the larger width would provide a wider turning radius for the larger vehicles. Concluding, O'Shea reported that the new office building is proposed at 60,000 square feet, including a new parking garage /ramp with 1,180 parking spaces, adding these spaces will accommodate existing and future parking levels. O'Shea said that at this time their thought is that the parking will be built first. With regard to West 66th Street it will be enhanced with landscaping including an enhancement of Drew Avenue. Discussion Commissioner Carr commented that she has a concern with the location of the loading dock and questioned if it could be placed in another location; possibly to the rear. Mr. O'Shea responded that they considered different locations for the garage; however, found no viable alternatives. He explained working with large semi - trailers poses a challenge. Carr also stated she wants the pedestrian walkways to be clearly delineated to ensure that both the pedestrians and vehicles are aware of these walkways. Commissioner Platteter stated that he agrees with Commissioner Schroeder's observation that the widths of the drive aisles entering and exiting the site are large. Platteter asked if vegetation would be planted to screen the new loading dock. Mr. O'Shea responded in the affirmative, adding their intent is to plant Spruce trees. O'Shea also noted there is a retaining wall /berm in this area along 66th Street that would also help screen the loading dock. Platteter asked the height of the new trees. O'Shea responded their intent is to plant 6 -foot trees. Page 6of14 Commissioner Forrest told the applicant she wants them to make every effort to completely screen the loading dock. She also expressed concern about truck maneuvering (backing up) and pedestrian safety in this area. Continuing, Forrest noted there is a discrepancy in parking numbers depicted on the 2007 submittal vs. this submittal, adding she wants assurances the parking is adequate. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing; being none Commissioner Grabiel moved to -close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Further Discussion and Motion Commissioner Carr stated she has reservations about the location of the new loading dock. Continuing, she reiterated she wants all walkways clearly delineated and would like more attention paid to Ian" dscaping along Drew Avenue and West 66th Street. Carr indicated as submitted she couldn't support the request as submitted. Commissioner Forrest reiterated her concern is about the differences in the parking calculations on the 2007 plan vs. the calculations submitted for this project. Forrest acknowledged the POP agreement; adding she doesn't want to see the site over parked but wants to ensure it is adequately parked. Forrest also noted she can't support the proposal as submitted; the loading dock needs further attention along with the ingress /egress. Chair Staunton pointed out that the applicant has presented a POP agreement indicating if more parking spaces are needed parking spaces would be increased per agreement. Commissioner Scherer asked to note for the record the overall plan provides 1,577 parking spaces and if the POP agreement is initiated there will be a total of 1,752 parking spaces. Commissioner Schroeder stated he doesn't like the way this project interfaces with West 66th Street. Schroeder reiterated that the ingress /egress is too wide, too much pavement for pedestrians to navigate and the minimal space for semi - trucks backing in and out makes him uncomfortable Continuing, Schroeder said he has no issue with the building, his issue is with site access and loading dock area. Continuing, Schroeder commented in order to get a "better product" the Commission could entertain the idea of approving setback variances to achieve a better development. Schroeder acknowledged a setback variance is needed for the ramp but with flexibility more may be able to be done with relief to the building setback. Chair Staunton agreed with Schroeder's comment and asked Mr. Reinke if they over considered expanding to the west. Mr. Reinke said expanding toward France Avenue wasn't considered because of the internal orientation of the building and setback. Continuing, Staunton asked if there was another place for the loading dock. Mr. Reinke responded as previously mentioned this is the best location for the loading dock because it reduces internal congestion and it consolidates the loading, delivery and trash removal. Reinke also noted this configuration also provides management with the opportunity to better manage all vehicle and pedestrian circulation. Reinke said that all deliveries from the semi - trucks would be coordinated so no Page 7 of 14 ,'•-a large vehicle deliveries would occur during peak hours. Large deliveries would take place in the early am or late pm managed by building management. Gayle Greion told the Commission that this project if approved would allow the site to accommodate deliveries from large vehicles; presently the site cannot accommodate large deliveries which are a detriment to the tenants. Greion said they are very happy to have a more formal delivery area that can accommodate large vehicles and lessen the harshness of Minnesota winter weather. Commissioner Platteter asked Mr. Greion to reiterate office management can regulate times when semi - trucks can deliver. Ms. Greion responded that delivery times can be scheduled through management and won't disrupt regular business hours. Commissioner Carr said another concern she has is with the proximity of the loading dock to other vehicles and pedestrian traffic. The discussion continued on the loading dock, traffic circulation, width of the drive aisles, landscaping, etc. with some Commissioners expressing the opinion that they couldn't support the proposal as submitted. Planner Teague reminded the Commission this project is for site plan approval adding what's requested is permitted. Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if the City Engineer has reviewed the project. Teague responded in the affirmative. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Site Plan approval with Variance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including the additional conditions: increase landscaping along Drew Avenue, plant taller trees (12 -foot) on West 66th Street to better screen the loading dock area, clearly delineate all pedestrian walkways and a reduce the width of the ingress /egress. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. Commissioner Carr asked Planner Teague if this motion should be done in two parts. Teague responded that the actions are tied so one motion is sufficient. Ayes; Platteter, Potts, Grabiel, Staunton. Nays; Scherer, Schroeder, Carpenter, Carr, Forrest. Motion failed 4 -5 VII. REPOND RECOM A. Sketch Plan Revie,York Avenue, the Wicks site of 14 W. ' , 11 o e HJ � �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator -Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague August 28, 2013 VI.0 Community Development Director ; INFORMATION /BACKGROUND. Project Description. Silver. Oak Development on behalf of the IRET Properties is proposing to build a four story 60,000 square foot medical office expansion, and new parking ramp expansion to the existing 273,000 square foot Southdale Medical Office building located at 6525 -45 France Avenue. (See location on pages Al —A2.) The new addition would be located on the south side of the existing building and west of the existing parking ramp. (See applicant narrative on pages A3 A10 and the proposed plans on pages Al2 —A32.) To accommodate the proposed addition, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review. 2. Parking Ramp Setback Variance from 40 and 34.5 feet to 34.5, 28 and 20 feet for the new parking deck to match the existing parking ramp setback. (See page A16a.) Differing setbacks are required for the ramp structure because the ramp itself is 34.5 feet tall; and the structure around the stairs is 40 feet tall. 3. Parking Stall Variance from 1,715 spaces to 1,577 spaces..A proof of parking plan for an additional deck could expand parking to 1,749 spaces has been provided. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Southdale Fairview Hospital; zoned and guided for regional medical office uses. Easterly: A variety of off medical and office uses; zoned and guided for medical office uses. Southerly: Southdale; zoned and guided for commercial uses. Westerly: Point of France; zoned and guided high density residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 9 acres in size, contains the Southdale Medical Center building and a parking ramp. The site is relatively flat. (See page A2.) Planning Guide Plan designation: RM, Regional Medical. (See page A11.) Zoning: RMD, Regional Medical District. Compliance Table a 2 City Standard Proposed Building Front — France Avenue 65.5 feet 100+ feet Side Street — 66th Street 65.5 feet 75 feet Side Street — Drew 65.5 feet 100+ feet Side Street — 65th Street 65.5 feet 100+ feet Parking Ramp Front — France Avenue 34.5 & 40 feet 100+ feet Side Street — 66th Street 34.5 & 40 feet 34.5 feet* Side Street — Drew 34.5 & 40 feet 20 -28 feet* Side Street — 65th Street 34.5 & 40 feet 7.4 feet (existing condition) Building Height 12 stories, and 144 feet 4 stories, and 65.5 feet Floor Area Ratio 100% 84% Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 10 -20 feet (all parking setback areas and drive - aisles are existing; no changes proposed) Parking Stalls 1,715 stalls 1,577 stalls proposed (1,752 stalls with the proof -of- parking) Over -story Trees 59 required 75 existing trees (number is based on the perimeter of the site) 2 Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed utilities and grading and drainage plans and found them to be generally acceptable. (See the City Engineer's comments on pages A106— A110.) A condition of approval should include meeting all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo. A .permit would' also be. required. from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed district. Parking There are currently three parking levels in the existing ramp. Levels one and two were constructed in 1964, and are in need of significant repair. Level three was I constructed in 2002.. The addition to the parking ramp would consist of removing and replacing levels one and two. Level three would be extended to the south end of the ramp and a new level four would be added. The new ramp,would total 1,180 spaces. There are 397 surface stalls on the site. The overall site would therefore, provide 1,577 parking spaces. Based on the. square footage of the existing building and proposed addition, 1,715 spaces are required. A proof -of- parking plan has been provided, that shows an additional 175 spaces could be added to the top level of the parking ramp to meet the city code. (See page A9.) The applicant does not believe that these stalls will be needed, but have agreed to construct them if parking becomes a problem. A condition of any approval should be that if parking becomes a problem, the additional stalls must be provided. WSB & Associates conducted a parking study, which concludes that the proposed parking should adequately serve the site. (See page A50.) Site Access & Traffic Currently there are two access points off of 66th Street. These two would be combined into one entrance, which would bee right in an6 right out only. All other access points would remain the same, including into the parking ramp. (See pages Al. 4 and A16.) WSB and Associates also completed a traffic study to analyze impacts on the adjacent roadways. (See study on pages A36— A105.) The study concludes that the existing adjacent roadways would support the proposed addition. However, as with all development proposed within this area recently, should delays and queuing ever become an issue at the France Avenue /65 Street intersection in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future, the Southdale Medical site will be responsible for their share of those improvements. (See page A50.) 3 Building Design The addition would be. constructed primarily of glass /glazing with masonry/architectural precast with composite aluminum panels. The ramp would also be made of mason ry:architectural precast. with the stairwells to be made of glass /glazing to match the building. :(See attached pages Al2 -A13.) The building-has-been designed to match or blend.with the existing six -story building on the site and.to match /blend.with the parking ramp.. Landscaping There are 75 mature trees around the perimeter of: the site,_ which is more than. required by code. Additional shrubs and'pla.ntings.would be provided at the entrance and along 66th Street to enhance the existing landscaping. (See pages A21 —A22.) Mechanical Equipment A new mechanical room is- planned to be) located within the parking ramp, at the north end. (See pages A24 -A28.) The mechanical equipment would be screened on the roof of the parking ramp. (See page A13.).: Loading Dock The loading dock for the new building would be located on the south side of the building facing 66th Street. The loading area meets the. required front yard setback. Extra landscaping: is. proposed: along 66th, to provide screening of the area, including five Black Hills Spruce. (See pages A21 -A22.) Variance — Parking Structure Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: . Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with 4 the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The location of the parking ramp is an existing condition; the variances are requested to enlarge the ramp by adding levels. A proof of parking plan was granted to add a fourth level to the ramp in 2007 as part of the most recent expansion to the Southdale Medical Office (See Council minutes from that approval including the conditions, of approval on pages A33 —A35.) The practical difficulty is:caused by the existing location of the ramp. It would not be reasonable to -require the ramp to be relocated to meet the required setback. The encroachment into the required -is minor compared to the mass of the structure that complies with the ordinance. (See page Al 6a.) 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstances are the location of the existing building and parking ramp that would make it difficult to relocate to meet the required setbacks. The proposed expansion is reasonable given the proposal does not exceed the FAR requirement of 1.0 for the site. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. A parking ramp already exists at the proposed setbacks. The addition of levels to the parking ramp would not alter the character of the neighborhood. Variance — Parking Stalls Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with 5 the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed iparking stall variance is reasonable. A parking study was conducted byWSB Associates that:concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the site. The study concludes that the medical office uses could function adequately with 1,422 spaces. There would be 1,577 spaces on the site with the addition to the parking ramp. (See page A50 of the, parking study.) A proof-of-parking plan has been provided, that shows an additional 175 spaces could be added to the top level of the parking ramp: to meet the city code. (See page A9.) The applicant does. not believe that these stalls will be needed, but have agreed to construct them if parking. becomes a problem. A condition of:any approval should be that if parking becomes a problem, the additiona[stalls must be provided. 2) There are circumstances' that are' unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstance is the existing location of the buildings and parking ramp on the site. It has been the city's general policy with previous similar requests, to not build parking stalls when they are not needed. 3) Will the variance alter the-essential character of the neighborhood? No. The.alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a larger and taller structured parking ramp. Based on the parking - study done by WSB', this parking would not be needed. PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposed addition and associated Variances reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the RMD, Regional Medical District. 2. The proposed building setbacks are met for the medical office addition, and the setbacks for the parking ramp expansion meet the existing parking ramp setbacks. 0 3. The proposed addition would. be supported by the existing roadway system, based on the traffic and parking study done by WSB and Associates. (See pages A36— A105.) 4. The variances are ..; reasonable. As. mentioned, the setbacks for the parking ramp expansion,:match the existing setbacks. The parking study concludes that the proposed addition and existing uses on the site would be supported by the existing parking facilities. Traditionally, the City of Edina has not required parking stalls, when they are not needed. Additional parking could be provided by adding levels to the existing parking ramps if needed. 5. The Southdale Medical Building and associated medical office uses provide a convenient community asset. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for the Southdale Medical building expansion. Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with: the exception of the parking space and ramp variances. 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses. 3. The variances are reasonable. As mentioned, the setbacks for the parking ramp expansion, match the existing setbacks. The parking study concludes that the proposed addition and existing uses on the site would be supported by the existing parking facilities. Traditionally, the City of Edina has not required parking stalls, when they are not needed. Additional parking could be provided by adding levels to the existing parking ramps if needed. 4. The parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. Approval of the Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: 7 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped July 26, 20.13. • Grading plan date stamped "July 26, 2013. • Landscaping plan date'stamped.July 26, 2011 o Lighting plan date stamped July 26, 2013. Building_ elevations date stamped July 26, 2013. Building materials board as. presenfed'at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally,- a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watel'shed. District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to 'meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in.his memo dated August 22, 2013.. 6. Should delays and queuing become an issue at the France Avenue /65 Street intersection in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 7. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. 8. The applicant must enter into a proof of parking agreement with the City to ensure the necessary parking space will be provided if needed. Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof of parking stalls constructed by adding the addition to the parking ramp. Deadline for a city decision: October 15, 2013 8 s G 117 �•.. -z T __ -- _ Parcel WIN 29-028-24-23-0172 6S4S FR�1N�� Owner Interacti�e Name: , Parcel 6545 France Ave S Property - -� Maps, /x Map .`. r CC••: r R R C. '4 59TH .^T TS IH it Y:'— :y - i ff NTH :irt Z_ I J ? y HA�M 10 1-1 Rri ".I- / .v� - 40- I A y ''1' -•.Ir �y 1'9 u 1 _`MU ST'.. Parnela Part, a r ter: fdt•Sir +z 0 2F1G 3TW ND SF ' t �o: _. t. m 2 2 HERITA i,r PR I J - SSt" .]iH f.1 O. [111 ::I :'. 1 z m r4IH �Tr = a j X U - u _. __Z Rc_land Park I si '.. i - O I _T -A' _ ' r u - CCTH ST'.1v s G 117 �•.. -z T __ -- _ Parcel WIN 29-028-24-23-0172 6S4S FR�1N�� Owner fit Name: , Parcel 6545 France Ave S Address: Edina, MN 55435 CT flRLTANZ RD .`. r CC••: r R R C. '4 n' a r > J ? y HA�M 10 1-1 Rri ".I- / _ - 40- I A y ''1' -•.Ir �y 1'9 u 1 _`MU ST'.. s G 117 �•.. -z T __ -- _ Parcel WIN 29-028-24-23-0172 6S4S FR�1N�� Owner Smb Operating Company Llc Name: Parcel 6545 France Ave S Address: Edina, MN 55435 Parcel 5.86 acres Area: 255,138 sq ft Il I z f6F.E 71-T `A �. 71 li� Sid •' r Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N Print Date: 8/21/2013 )V This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 '� Ihiak Green! Interactive Property f MaI�sOr� Map A r ;. v + rj r, 42 ' � x4 i, � R 1 �'� �� �+ r • j�p '�'\ � ..•fir ��. i.. r-�, » . : I� "� $ _ ,_ :,�.._ �� . p�� ' �j0' !•r — `� ,. C`�R `fir �" +jl� �`� .:"� � 'p 7 t� is Writ' j ^r �R"4 _ 4ft .- MR l Parcel 29- 028 -24 -23 -0172 ID: Owner Smb Operating Company Llc Name: Parcel 6545 France Ave S Address: Edina, MN 55435 Parcel 5.86 acres Area: 255,138 sq ft AZ I t..Il A Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 8/21/2013 -(k This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 A Think Green! A�PP� i ��► -�vT' COLLABORATIVE Design(y.roup,inc. July 26, 2013 Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Southdale Medical Office Building Dear Cary: As noted in the City of Edina - Site Plan Application, a "written statement describing the intended use of the property and why the City should approve the request ", shall be included. Please find requested information below: The proposed project will include approximately 60,000 square feet of new medical office building, a new loading dock to serve the entire campus, a new central plant for cooling and heating and a new parking garage with 1,180 parking spaces. Office Building The new office building component is approximately 60,000 square feet and 4 stories with a partial basementformechanical /electrical and a underground tunnel connection to the existing facility for building services. The new building is specifically designed to accommodate medical office uses. and to support such uses. Retail, restaurant or other service providers are anticipated at the ground floor level of the building. The building is 15, 000 square feet per floor and 14 feet floor to floor. The office is anticipated to attract "ClassA °medical office tenants. Loading Dock The existing facility does not have a "true "loading dock. The new design will incorporate 2 full size . loading berths and 1 small loading berth with a raised dock area, dock levelers, dock seal and dock bumpers This loading facility is needed as the overall campus building size has grown to 333, 000 square feet and the current loading situation is creating traffic and pedestrian safety concerns. The new dock area will alleviate this problem. Central Plant The existing Medical Office Building shares an agreement with Southdale Fairview Hospital to provide steam and chilled water for heating and cooling of their facility. As hospital demand has grown the Medical Office Building has struggled to maintain summer cooling, especially during the worst days. In anticipation of even greater decreased supply from the hospital's central plant the Medical Office Building is proposing providing their own central plant, therefore guaranteeing appropriate utilities for the future. Architecture Engineering Interiors Planning Preservation 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 t612.332.3654 f332.3626 Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer 3 www .collaborativedesigngroup.com Parking Gg_mge There.are currendy 3 parking levels in the existing garage providing approximately 738 parking spaces. The third level was constructed in 2002 and levels one and two were. constructed in 1964. Levels one. and two are both in need ofsigniricant repair and have seen their useful service period. The proposed garage anticipates demolishing level one and two and leaving the current, newer, level three. Newlevels one and two will be built, level three. will be extended to south end of the site and a newlevel four will be added. The total new parking ramp will provide 1,180 spaces. This new ramp and additional parking is needed to meet the current parkingneeds as well as the expanded need due to the addition of the 60,000 square foot office building. Request Approval The City should approve this request because. - The project will create greater safety for pedestrians and vehicular traffic. - The project will consolidate and organize the loading, delivery and trash removal. This has the added benefit of allowing building management to more closely regulate and monitor these activities. - Parking additions are being made to satisfy the current need and added building square footage. Ourgoals is not to "over park "but "appropriately park': . - The potential addition'ofthe central plant will better serve the existing and new tenants. The building will be better positioned to appropriately control building systems and energy cost This will have a significant impact on the campus in the future as energy cost rise. - The additional medical office space will benefit the hospital and community by allowing critical medical services to expand in a location that directly supports the hospital's mission and all surrounding businesses Very truly yours, Collaborative Design Group, Inc. Mark Beckman Project Architect Enclosures 0 .COLLABORATIVE Desjglx'r llp'«'�. July 26, 2013 Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Variances for Southdale Medical Office Building Parking Ramp Dear Cary: The attached Variance Application includes three variances related to the proposed parking ramp at the east side of the Southdale Medical Office Building Campus. The inter - related variances are as follows: 1. Fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Reduced setbacks from the lot lines. 3. Increase in building height relative to set backline locations. As noted in the City of Edina — Variance Application (page 2) the following four items are addressed. • The proposed variance will relieve some practical difficulties relative to set back and height of the parking ramp. The parking ramp needs to be expanded to four levels to meet the parking requirements. The existing three level ramp, structurally designed for vertical expansion, is at or over the setbacks for three levels. It would be difficult and costly to not add to the existing structure. • Adding on to the existing ramp already too close to the property line is an extraordinary circumstance unique to this property. .• The proposed variances will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. The new four level ramp will generally meet height and set back requirements along 66th Street and will be unchanged along 65th Street. • The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The adjacent blocks contain hospital, retail, and offices occupancies that will not be adversely affected by the granting of these variances. A detailed explanation of each variance and supporting data is attached. Architecture Engineering Interiors Planning Preservation 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 x612.332.3654 (332.3626 Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer www .collaborativedesigngroup.com 46 Y ry Very truly yours, Collaborative Design Group, Inc. Mark Beckman Project Architect Enclosures 46 Variance No. 1: Parking Spaces Provided Explanation of Request: Applicant is seeking a variance to provide fewer parking spaces than what is required by the Zoning Ordinance. Per SubSectiorr 850.08, Subd. 1, paragraph M, parking spaces shall be provided at the rate of 1 space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space for each physician or dentist. Parking Calculations. and Analysis: Existing office buildings @ 273,000 sq. #t. + new office building @ 60,000 sq. ft. = 333,000 sq. ft. gross / 200 sq. ft. = 1,665 cars + 50 physicians (estimated number on site at one time) = 1,715 cars total required on site. Analysis of existing parking lot and ramp usage in June 2013 indicates that approximately 932 spaces, or 74.3 %, of the available 1254 are being utilized at any one time. ( See Attached Exhibit B — Existing Parking Utilization) Based on existing usage of 932 plus full requirement of 300 spaces for the new 60,000 sq. ft. office building the owner would like to propose the initial construction of 4 level ramp accommodating 1,180 spaces. The parking ramp plus the other 397 spaces on site would provide a total of 1,577 parking spaces on the campus. 1,577 is 92% of the required 1,715 parking stalls. See attached Survey and parking ramp plans A fifth level on the parking ramp, accommodating 175, is proposed as "proof of parking," bringing the potential total to 1,752 spaces. See attached Exhibit C — Parking Summary and parking ramp plans. A7 Exhibit B - Parking Utilization Analysis Southdale Medical Campus Between June 11 and 17, 2013 a parking utilization analysis was conducted on the existing parking facilities (surface lots and parking ramp) Numbers below indicate the parking. spaces recorded as open at the times indicated. Tues 6/11 — Surface lots — 33 open, Ramp 249 open - 10 AM 75 open, 263 open — 3 PM Wed 6/12 — Surface lots — 70 open, Ramp 243 open — 10 AM 49 open, Ramp 269 open — 3 PM Thurs 6/13 Surface lots — 31 open, Ramp 250 open —10 AM 97 open, Ramp 271 open — 3 PM Fri 6/14 Surface lots — 105 open, Ramp 279 open — 10 AM 132 open, Ramp 307 open — 3 PM Mon 6/17 Surface lots —19 open, Ramp 224 open —10 AM 55 open, Ramp 275 open — 3 PM After deleting the smallest and largest numbers, the average number of open spaces on site at any given time is 322. 1254 spaces on site minus 322 = 932 occupied spaces. AB Exhibit C - Project Parking Count Summary Southdale Medical Campus July 26, 2013 Zoning Requirements: 1 car per 200 sq. ft. gross floor area, plus 1 car per doctor 333,000 sq. ft. gross / 200 sq. ft. = 1,665 cars + 50 physicians (estimated number on site at one time) = 1,715 cars total Proposed Project Parking: Existing Parking to Remain: Surface Parking (west and north lots) Lower Level Parking (6525 Building): "Courtyard" Parking: Total Existing Parking: New /Remodeled Parking Ramp: Basement Level: First Level (Grade): Second Level: Third Level: Fourth Level: Total Parking in Ramp: South. Surface Lot (new) Total Parking Proposed: Proof of Parking: (future, if needed) Ramp Fifth Level: Total Parking Al 310 75 6 391 129 256 276 281 238 1,180 6 1,577 1750 1,752 Explanation of Request: Applicant is seeking a variance for front and side yard setbacks exceeding those allowed by the zoning ordinance. Per paragraph G of Subd 5 of SubSection 850.08 the required front and side yard setback is 20 feet plus 1 foot for each foot of height exceeding 20 feet. It is proposed that the existing parking ramp, three levels at the north end and two levels at the south end, be expanded�vertically to a height of four levels (five levels with "proof of parking "). The existing parking ramp width and structural column grid will be maintained. The existing three level ramp is already over the set back lines along 65th Street and Drew Avenue. Setback Summary Data: Building height equals the required setback. Proposed height: Four level ramp at top of parapet: 34' -6" Five level ramp at top of parapet: 44' =6 Proposed height: Top of stair tower at southeast corner: 39' -8" Top of stair tower at southeast corner: 49' -8" Existing height: Top of parapet at speed ramp at 65t1h St.: 23' -6" Proposed Setbacks from property lines: Drew Avenue at 65th Street (north end of site): 20.06 ft. Drew Avenue at 66th Street (south end of site): 28.54 ft. 66th Street at stair tower: 35:0 ft. 65th Street at existing speed ramp: 7.4 ft. (existing condition) Ale ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan G.L Figure 4.3 City of Edina Future Land Use Plan 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS r- LJ- -LJ—1 0 0 5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design I 4 -25 Southdale Medical Campus 3800 West 66th Street Project and Zoning Data z «I., �x..lk.lb,. .Pw,.l x.dau.lYlxwo) s.wwt Fs�.IF Ola. Yb s.lb«.. axiwb mvm wdaay rxq+I.Wx.wao-ase.. to ^Y or..t �e.t Walt walWmY Wpe lw�rxn top mb YOwbtxq. Mrn kr J w\+.+lao.aro c+A smw F�a. MQn P omww.. Px"+o siw FMFdM arc «z�RSa aw.wyme..a. rat Fwle w+,. bxelry Ywp: « r «ep t'b w nneMF.«"IMP.nsy twv Hasa zv. arcProW Yx..i. rAat ].'s' e. Sw negn x trd <: ]9d vanwy: trzx of GfA W, w+cbbwn q.Jtla'. F. ,q ubabp cFA: Il ;wbY hev.« «wnerq cvA: w.wbJ l.xb avw.ty TaY Sbv Arvs: ]a ;woJ 'alJ NOpe.w eMtlb,p GFA: ,S,oNY xwnM. el EJ a anM SPw «: I]SF Project Location Ffkl r •o.e • xv � .mil I ] x d� i s M1 F L «. 9... y f a c Jr E "•w i a n.b..a� NJ«: t. FMewoJCF.asnwt MbbYbxr. 1 GMY. ame�aFF, o-rb�FlrwF ,b�wv,.ayaFV�wbs�FyFMtW bFwhp .W F,w,w e,.Fxa FFA•,�...«.s..dbd,F.bx.. ba.war�.,.a,..�.. Y «.x.,wx.ro x...F.. . eon w,'YVbnm Abwwa FWS'V GFA'abxbaw bala`m/a•Fraw. ]]]YOO.e rto-oaar zoo w.n I.ew uF•wpbYYas psuwwex,�mmYwum.)•I rlsuFaJ __ ns l+oY ere mnloxY. en q� iGalFhM1q PMxp ]91 iusl Pvebq n Nxq: I.tw vxtt iwJ vanbq t,lY Edina, Minnesota COLLABORATNE nesignCroup,ax U0 1.L U ca v CCN ^C rWrt � M by y N L w b d I A w SITE PLAN APPROVAL JULY 26, 2013 SHEET INDEX, CODE DATA, PROJECT TEAM AND LOCATION MAP W °Ili' I�s�= IIA■g4 ■Ir i�.xui:�t..��'.^- "�' _ _���� - — - -- rcl�.lt'9AI�` mjtR I 7E I- MEDICAL CAMPUS VIEW FROM 66th STREET& DREW MEDICAL CAMPUS& PARKING RAMP VIEW FROM DREW i tN wrrJ�w e�y . aN - rwwsr' �■ MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING SOUTHWEST FACADE MEDICAL CAMPUS PARKING RAMP VIEW FROM 66th STREEr mm COMPOSITE/ G—J NS MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING VIEW OF LINK TO „ LUM, URAL PRECAST ALUMINUM PA SOUTH ELEVATION - MATERIALS & HEIGHTS SCALE: 1'.0" EXISTING ca - COLLNBOIUrne Design —p,- N 1 ,- ca CU C � 5 = V�. W APPROVAL JULY 26, 2013 BUILDING ELEVATION PERSPECTIVES A400 COLLABOR4TIVE C. cc 0 v CD CDN dQ L N � - o 0 o 6 � � w SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction EXISTING t CONDITIONS - � NORTH ^ wCCIIbWelow. Mrm C.CIIv.I°.Yan pip. 0 30 60 C101 • o f :1� -i� f Fes- -- — _ — -o' — -. IIII � Hy i1 J,' .. - . _— — _ —.- -- -- '— COLLABOR4TIVE C. cc 0 v CD CDN dQ L N � - o 0 o 6 � � w SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction EXISTING t CONDITIONS - � NORTH ^ wCCIIbWelow. Mrm C.CIIv.I°.Yan pip. 0 30 60 C101 M A TCWLIRE -7 I—N qT ED - - - - -- - 7 — — ---------- LT: A IIAT..L oE 11H r 1, Iz f 12 N ILI 0 r. 575 1-8 12 /7R>' " rz 64� 070 2 r 0 -OCLq 15- (7� `0. -jL 66TH STREET 11 EST — — — — — — — — — - J ........... --1 F7- llT X d �� 0 X—hr.Below. Cdlbd—Y--ft a 20 40 COLLABORATIVE DesignGmUp,- U) CL E m 0 tLf (D z Mw SCHEMATIC DESIGN DEMOLITION 0102 TRICT I F 1114 r I i3 21 t 0 T. me hen Cd[bW-Y.ft Mlllm%mmi 30 50 coLweorsnrne 1. ca I I P 0 ■ R CL E ca ca CD P, to SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction OVERALL SITE PLAN 0200 I GFiA11 PLL FECL54nRY PERITS PJP. Ca KTEUCIYYI Y�nwe, K ueE OF, FMK r:tirr -a vAv T. iNE LY.rtAI FIE, WrtCH CNI BF parI1E0 fC(M iN HRtEER, 9NALL et 116M F� ST <rtC, 05A%fP FKES EETWFFI 1 iFF nRAYRY.4 Nn A' p 1 1 4wLL EF RFPat1Er/ 1J ixFAF 1 Y. POUrAP P ' . 9NOWI p! 1FESe _ a >va6:5 N.n rxE —Al eF.nEL fcf. swat eE ca -wPRtn rJ rte su oRPv 3 6W.nFC LA1(N1 H4'LE9 PIE PARALLH Y111 t# ItRPEBV^W.R rO 1xe MLSFe _ LPE 41 TxF LMAiq! eG1CATEC. 4 CcENS'pL SNJYY! AFE TJ A. OF NRB Ain F/rE— FACE 6 tAO4C U4E. INiEO OMEP.YtiE ' S CELYEAIE OArt.EC Si:.LL4 Y'rtx A i-rCx W[! WxYt P /srtEU 9TFEF. [tuEA1F ACCESS A9. Y'nx s-Fk'H Wnt En 9r. ES 4° fKFE! a! CEIliER f Al 14 CEWi1 S+L'LE i0 [REGrthl aE iF.AYEL. = au. SPACE ("—AFE s1:EAl eFamEO RAw.r pE STALL CH TOJ 9F JF 68033 F —A. 0. pF CAC PER pd;ip¢ _ 9ii,PJJ EF T—L 113,OM */2- - ,w, r . SJ PuYY_IAItl 4]H 31AU9 65TI1 STREET WEST TI Tor UH eA 1 I I —AL 9t< I I AL I—. #11AL. f0 -1A. Ile S¢I EA. Ac i ie j Im j I ..• FEW PAR[NC (P4¢tN6 04¢ALt) �vseP a star tMn I 4Jf AL PAR6,C %ELLS G¢JVn.En G FA . x TF!UC[Si415 � 3 (NSij 9E < . — _��I___.��_ ; __ _ — _ ________________ eT'[__ 1-ta -- O 1 — li ! I 1 IYAr7r w n A N niR�N e cYr., wla Gepl ,p RI STALLS M PARENG J A C STALLS TC PACA C STLLS P¢ FA FAAAQP I A'.. us -v EA. EIOSTN.^. PERVIN3 Ss. F¢I'gJi 6.]]I SF TO... (10.6V A,) Y65.Bi3 SF. 1ov- P¢gPOSEU. F41•ANS st,]90 9 ItsSk vt¢vtcus Yc,us sF. ce.+ss TOTAL (e ?.69 AN :64p44 9F. IAV.P\ — Mp H — RFaalA1 rtornL J 1FL1 _a.e Ian) Fcd,i YMD (f6iN ST) - Fr. IPRN. Pu.r +r. FEx:Nr, R.A. tGSTN sil - GS Ft. (M.p +. eLLLaK FEY.M) 3E%E (PREY• Alt.) - . Fr, (PM:P PuDYL^ FEIL1t) b v, TEAI 6 AS FcumF•s. FRw t YMD 166THEIT) Ss 11. (PROP, 6A¢PLe —1) ..R (64TH 3T) 93 fi. (MOP, —A. NEk'HL) 56t (OFEW A. 14 Ft. (Ma`. 6i.PA. FEIL1,r) 1F 1 WARD tE sTREET) - TO 11 R c NORTH Know whol's Below. 1 Call before you dig. 0 30 60 FE MATCWLRE E) I 66TH STREET wEsr MATr-WL.AE (ME LEFTI c 0 — — — — — r 0 C4 C4 I 66TH STREET wEsr MATr-WL.AE (ME LEFTI c 0 — — — — — — — -- 0 C4 C4 E 11- UPI f LL 11 - 0 NORT DmwhcnBelow. C.U.—y!.dlg. mom�w� 20 40 COLLABORATIVE DCSignCmup,- U) CL E CD ca -0 Not for Construcllon unssxLm SITE PLAN C201 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- LL 11 - 0 NORT DmwhcnBelow. C.U.—y!.dlg. mom�w� 20 40 COLLABORATIVE DCSignCmup,- U) CL E CD ca -0 Not for Construcllon unssxLm SITE PLAN C201 :.J .J :g rt CFO om 1E> -T. EX- P-ED TID A.LE IED161 co eulNO L. 66TH STREET WEST --------- !� ----------- MATrWLAr: k 7-7 --------------- 0 — E> MATCWL&E w :.J .J :g rt CFO om 1E> -T. EX- P-ED TID A.LE IED161 co eulNO L. 66TH STREET WEST --------- !� ----------- > 2f !qqllj D . . ............. NORTH Koo�wtxnBelaw. cahw-yooft M^Imi o 20 40 ce - COLLABORATIVE DC34pGrOUp,- L A 1 11 1 CL E m 2 8 o 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction .—,. .., —I.., & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C301 1 I I lu� I I E> 7 > 2f !qqllj D . . ............. NORTH Koo�wtxnBelaw. cahw-yooft M^Imi o 20 40 ce - COLLABORATIVE DC34pGrOUp,- L A 1 11 1 CL E m 2 8 o 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction .—,. .., —I.., & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C301 ENLARGED AREA I WE 1A a ENLARGED AREA 2 JL> ------- - :LIZ- S. 0 NGRTH L—homllelaw. cd1b.r-y. ft MeNlmi 0 20 40 ,. ca I I I F 0 R M CL E (D A ED SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction DETAILED GRADING PLAN C302 -,l T : , I If E>j gem. T E>l --- ------------- 7 uo - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — o II FiE NORTH N. CCIIbW- rmlm� Y-ft o 20 40 cowleoRArnE CL E Lo E Not for Construction UnLMES C401 MATCWL&E r F.. T FiE NORTH N. CCIIbW- rmlm� Y-ft o 20 40 cowleoRArnE CL E Lo E Not for Construction UnLMES C401 E> E>—.— ID— =47= FROP05ED 5OUTHE)ALE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING EXFIAN61ON 60, 00 S.F. 0. —411. LT NORTH K— wbcn NOW. mllm� Cdlberm.y-ft 0 10 20 re CL E CD A Ur 2 Ur 0 Cn SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction LANDSCAPE PLAN- L201 o ZO ollrAlio, -10, o c 0 o d- FROP05ED 5OUTHE)ALE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING EXFIAN61ON 60, 00 S.F. 0. —411. LT NORTH K— wbcn NOW. mllm� Cdlberm.y-ft 0 10 20 re CL E CD A Ur 2 Ur 0 Cn SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction LANDSCAPE PLAN- L201 00NI11ROUS TREE PLANTING WX PLANTED PARKING ISLAND .1. Wj. BICYCLE RACK DETAIL 2. 1HRU11 1Lk"NG sin EDGING AT PLANTING BED et 0 K— whom Below. CCU bf-Yft o 10 20 cc - COLLABORATIVE Dcdl;nGroup.- L I U F 0 R H U) CL E SCHEMATIC DESIGN Not for Construction: LANDSCAPE DETAILS L701 (� T n T T T T T T? rz 13 fa td.1 15 ,16 17 19 19 I III 1 P1 l Tl 7 1 XS 1 ze I _- r-_- f-- I-- T-- T- T-- 1-- T- T- T- T- T - - -1 -_ BASEMENT LEVEL PARKING PLAN 117 STANDARD PARKING 12 COMPACT PARKING 129 TOTAL m OFFICE BUILDING (FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SEE SHEET A210) ., COLLABORATIVE DedgnGroup,- CL V cc 0 (D % /W/�} " N w w �O u SITE PLAN APPROVAL JULY 26, 2013 . e� BASEMENTLEVEL PARKING PLAN A200 I I� Im BASEMENT LEVEL PARKING PLAN 117 STANDARD PARKING 12 COMPACT PARKING 129 TOTAL m OFFICE BUILDING (FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SEE SHEET A210) ., COLLABORATIVE DedgnGroup,- CL V cc 0 (D % /W/�} " N w w �O u SITE PLAN APPROVAL JULY 26, 2013 . e� BASEMENTLEVEL PARKING PLAN A200 a� i► j 234 STANDARD PARKING OFFICE BUILD N G 22 COMPACT PARKING - - (FOR REFERENCE ONUY, SEE SHEET A2tt) 256 TOTAL Q FIRST LEVEL PARKING PLAN 2� �wae ,r..v COLLABORATIVE _ nesigaGrOUp,- ,m.w im cc U V N •y Yl N i T v 0 G E V ! Ian W SITE PLAN APPROVAL JULY 26, 2013 FIRST LEVEL PARKING PLAN A201 ITT 7 coLLARCIRATNE nesigacroup,� N Q E m U V C� C � - M y N N b d = 3 s C °= m a m w SITE PLAN APPROVAL JULY 26, 2013 SECOND LEVEL PARKING PLAN MIM t T T n T T n T T T io n Y 7, 7I W %RTHIR. LEVEL PARKING PLAN - COLLABORATIVE nesignc=p,- imm.m ss9°ioi m Q. P cc cj cu v . C� G /QRi m •V N � � N � d 0 � m a0 a � W SITE PLAN APPROVAL JULY 26. 2013 THIRD LEVEL PARKING PLAN A203 /�� � �/ 2� �•_".. vm •ter 10 11 � t2 t3 to 1a.1 � 15 16 17 to t9 zo z1 zz z7 za I �� I ",*hl VLA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I L® t FIFTH LEVEL PARKING PLAN COLLABORATIVE DesignGPOup,i- ,ro� m'ss�ioi W em®s.a.,ya:vm. A�A ].L E co V cu V A� SW G CD N V! N M N H N t INO d APPROVAL JULY 26, 2013 FIFTH LEVEL PARKING PLAN A205 b51 52 9 S9' 55 � 56 1 BASEN EMT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN x210 wVe w is r R11MG RN R I I I II I I ' I I - '; I I I .ewvsl.au ,i I, wma..nu I k I I II it I II I A li A I e II II I I� �I I � El- ta am I I I b57 52 5] 5/ 55 56 I w� t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN COLLABORATIVE Design —up.- a U ca V :a •V � N L ,Np d SITE PLAN OFFICE BUILDING FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A211 W t TYPICA 'SECOND THIRD & FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 17 � •* a cB U ca v y � t�0 d }� C SITE PLAN APPROVAL JULY 26, 2013 OFFICE BUILDING TYPICAL SECOND, THIRD & FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A212 . ........... ............ ... . . . . . . ..... . ..... . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. ...... ........... ........... I ........ ............. .......... ............... .......... ............... . . . . . . . . . . . u � � — u . � — � ................... .............................. ....................... .......... .................... ....................... F ............. ....... ........... ....... -------------------- —611 .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . %� SITE PLAN POINT BY POINT CALCS COLLABORATIVE DcdgnGrOUp'- SEBESTA BLOMBERG ICU 0 (D u A 2 E 0 I . IE d July 26, 2013 SITE PLAN POINT BY POINT CALCULATIONS E01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L . . . ... . . . . T . . . ... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d- . . . . . . ... . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - --- - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .... . . ..... . . . ..... .. . . . . . . . ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . I . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %� SITE PLAN POINT BY POINT CALCS COLLABORATIVE DcdgnGrOUp'- SEBESTA BLOMBERG ICU 0 (D u A 2 E 0 I . IE d July 26, 2013 SITE PLAN POINT BY POINT CALCULATIONS E01 ROLLCALL Hovland. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 17, 2007 7:00 P.M. .g rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Swenson and Mayor CONSENT AGENDA EMS APPROVED Motion ma y Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson approv the Council Consent A da as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, enson, Hov d Motion carried. 2007 IMAGES OF EDINA PHOX0 C'QJNTEST WINNERS RECOGNIZED Communications Director Bennerotte introduced e winners o e 2007 Images of Edina Photo Contest: "Good Hair Day by Polly Norman for a "Doing Business ategory; "Puppy Love" by Libby Pastor for the "Raising Families" catego ; "Fall at Cornelia" by Bar a Nichols for the "Living' category; "Spark" by Diane Schroeder the "Learning" category; and cie the Shutterbug' taken by 5 -year old Grace Hendrickso ,for the "Judges Choice Award." Mayor. ovland presented the awards to each recipient whil eir photos were displayed: 2007 OF THE REGULAR MEETING: OF JULY 3, 200'7 AND ORK.SESSION OF TUNE 19, ►VED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by. , ber Swenson approving I the minutes of the Regular Meeting Of July 3, 2007, and Work Session of June 19, Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -78 ADOPTED APPROVING "FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SOUTHDALE MEDICAL BUILDING OPERATING CO.,.6545/25 FRANCE AVENUE, BUILDING_ EXPANSION Affidavits of notice were presented approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Teague explained the applicant, SMB Operating Company requested Final Development Plan to allow the expansion of the Southdale Medical Building located at 6545/25 France Avenue. Mr. Teague said. the proponent was present and would .address the proposal with the Council. He reported the Planning Commission recommended the City Council consider approving the requested final development plan based on the following findings: • The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a final development plan, and • The parking stalls would meet the city code with the proof of parking plan. Further, Mr. Teague the Planning Commission recommended the final development plan be subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 6, 2007 date changed to July 11, 2007. • Grading plan dated June 6, 2007. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 6, 2007. •. Building elevations date stamped June 6, 2007. Page 1 433 A inutes/Edina City Counciouly 17, 2007 • Proof of Parking Plan date stamped June 6, 2007. 2. The property owner will be responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. The applicant must enter into a.proof of parking agreement with the City to ensure the lJ necessary parking space will be provided if needed. Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof of parking stalls be constructed by adding the addition to the parking deck, and increasing the number of compact stalls. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek watershed district permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. All miti gation measures required by the transportation commission and by the transportation studies must be completed by the applicant. 6. All conditions required by the City Engineer in his June 15, and June 22, 2007 memorandum: 7. The realigned access on 66th Street will be subject to Hennepin County approval. 8. The property owner would be required to pay their fair share of the cost of a traffic signal on 65th Street, per city policy if warrants were met for installation. Dennis Zylla, 5353 Wayzata Boulevard, Developer, introduced the development team, of Todd Young, KKE Architects, Tom Wenz Sr., Investors Real Estate Trust and John Crawford of URS Corporation. Mr. Zylla reviewed the proposed addition to the Southdale Medical Building using graphic displays and narrative. Issues discussed by Council included: location where existing contract parking customers will be sent, methodology of determining parking adequacy of site, concern about parking adequacy with aging community, how would signage be addressed, traffic congestion concern, potential need for a signal, location of the proposed sidewalk, whether there was a need for a bike rack, why the traffic consultant used the ITE trip generation manual instead of an actual count,. traffic. circulation on the site, the curb cut on W 66th Street, proposed building materials, review of the proposed addition, landscaping, islands proposed in the parking lot, West 65th Street turn lane, signage and drainage issue. Various members of the development team and city staff answered the questions. Public Comment Kathryn Friedell, 6566 France Avenue, President of Point of France Homeowners, expressed concern regarding traffic congestion, signage, landscaping and drainage. Linda Schmitz, 6583 Barrie Road, expressed concern with traffic on Barrie Road and requested adequate signage. Dr. Anthony Shibley, Ob Gyn Specialists, PA, 3625 France Avenue, urged approval of the proposed addition, stating it was needed. He indicated that during his ten years of tenancy he had not seen a parking problem. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion introducing and adopting Resolution No. 2007 -78 approving the Final Development Plan for Southdale Medical Operating Company for the building expansion at 6545/25 France Avenue with the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 6, 2007 date changed to July 11, 2007. Page 2 A 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/luly 17, 2007 • Grading plan dated June 6, 2007. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 6, 2007. • Building elevations date stamped June 6, 2007. • Proof of Parking Plan date stamped June 6, 2007. 2. The property owner will be responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 3. The applicant must enter into a proof of parking agreement with the City to ensure the necessary parking space will be provided if needed. Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof of parking stalls be constructed by adding the addition to the parking deck, and increasing the number of compact stalls. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek watershed district permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. All mitigation measures required by the Transportation Commission and by the Transportation Studies must be completed by the applicant. 6. All conditions required by the City Engineer in his June 15, and June 22, 2007 memorandums. 7. The realigned access on 66th Street will be subject to Hennepin County approval. 8. Install traffic signal per city policy if warrants were met. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING FOR REQUESTED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & VARIANCE, CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, 4015 INGLEWOOD AVENUE, BUILDING EXPANSION CONTINUED TO AUGUST 7, 2007 Mr. Teague explained that due to a deficiency in the mailed notices staff recommended the Calvin Christian School public hearing be continued until August 7, 2007. Member Swenson moved to continue the hearing for the requested conditional use permit by Calvin Christian School, 4015 Inglewood Avenue allowing a proposed building expansion until August 7, 2007. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2007-79 GRANTING VARIANCE, 4548 OXFORD AVENUE Affidavits of notice were presented approved and ordered placed on file. Assistant Planner Aaker explained the Zoning Board of Appeals had granted a variance to the property owners at 4548 Oxford Avenue, to allow the homeowners to construct an addition to their home. She noted the Zoning Board approved the request on a majority vote of 2 members to 1 member. Mr. Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Avenue, had requested the City Council consider his appeal of the Zoning Board's decision. Ms. Aaker explained the property currently accessed the home from Hollywood, but after the proposed addition the property would have access from Oxford. She added the property was a corner lot and therefore subject to two front yard setbacks. Ms. Aaker stated the homeowners originally submitted plans that would have placed the proposed addition much closer to Hollywood. She noted the revised plan kept the garage in -line and at the same setback as the existing non - conforming setback of the home from Oxford Avenue and also increased the proposed setback of the new side wall of the garage to 15 feet from Hollywood. Dick Miller, 5340 Hollywood Road, presented his appeal of the granted variance. He pointed out the entire home located at 4548 Oxford was built outside of the buildable area. Mr. Miller said granting Page 3 A WSB &Anwi.tes, Inc. Infrastructure a Engineering a Planning ■ Construction Memorandum DATE: August 22, 2013 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE: South dale Medical Campus Expansion Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -45 Background 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed expansion of the Southdale Medical Campus will have on the adjacent roadway system as well as the existing medical office parking and site circulation. The site is located north of 66th Street (CSAH 53) between France Avenue (CSAH 17) and Drew Avenue. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed plan includes: construction of a 60,000 sf expansion to the existing medical office campus, and; the expansion /reconstruction of the existing parking ramp with the addition of 1180 new parking spaces. Access to the existing site is from two full movement driveways on 65tH Street, a full movement driveway to the parking ramp from Drew Avenue, a right - in/right -out driveway from 66t1 Street and a right -in only driveway from 661h Street. The proposed site plan will modify the access on 66th Street, eliminating the right -in only access and shifting the right - in/right -out access approximately 100 feet west. This access modification will require approval from Hennepin County. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing. and proposed site expansion were evaluated at the following locations. France Avenue at 66th Street • France Avenue at 65th Street • 65th Street at Southdale Medical Office west driveway/Hospital entrance • 65th Street at Southdale Medical Office east driveway • Drew Avenue at Southdale Medical Office Parking Ramp driveway • 65th Street at Drew Avenue • 66th Street at Drew Avenue • 66th Street at Southdale Medical Office Right- in/Right -out driveway • 66th Street at Southdale Medical Office Right -in only driveway 431 Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 2 of 16 The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. Existing Traffic Characteristics The existing lane configuration and traffic control include: France Avenue (CSAH 17) is north /south a 6 -lane. divided Arterial roadway from south of 66th Street to north of 65th Street. Primary.access to France Avenue is by local streets and major development driveways. The posted speed limit on France Avenue in the vicinity of the site is 40 mph. 66th Street (CSAH 53) is an east /west 4 -lane divided Minor Arterial roadway. Street access and access to adjacent developments including the Southdale Medical Office and. Southdale Shopping Center is.provided from this roadway. The speed limit posted on 66th Street is 35 mph. 65th Street 65th Street is an east /.west City street with numerous access driveways. The existing roadway configuration includes a single lane in each direction. All the driveway access points are`controlled with stop signs,, stopping the exiting movements from the: developments. A 30' mph speed limit is posted on this roadway. Drew Avenue is a north/south City street with numerous access driveways. The existing roadway configuration between 66th Street and 65th Street•includes a single lane in each direction with a continuous center left turn lane (three lane section). All the driveway access points are controlled with stop signs, stopping :the exiting movements: from "the developments. .A 30 mph speed limit is posted on this roadway. Drew Avenue north of 65th Street is a two -lane street providing access around Fairview. Southdale Hospital. The lane configurations at each of the study area intersection are as follows: France Avenue at 66th Street — Traffic Signal Control SB France Ave approaching 66th St — one right/through, two through, one left NB France Ave approaching 66th St — one right, three through, one left EB 66th St approaching France Ave — one right, two through, one left WB 66th St approaching France Ave — one right, two through, two left France Avenue at 65th Street - Traffic Signal Control SB France Ave approaching 65th St — one right/through, two through; one left NB France Ave approaching 65th. St — one right/through, two through, one left EB 65th St approaching France Ave — one right /through, one left WB 65th St approaching France Ave — one right, one through/left . 65th Street at Southdale Medical Office/Hospital west driveway — Side. Street Stop SB Hospital driveway approaching 65th St — one right / through/left NB Southdale Medical Office driveway approaching 65th St — one right/through/left EB 65th St approaching Hospital /Southdale Medical Office driveway — one right/through /left " 65th St approaching Hospital/Southdale Medical Office driveway - one right /through /left AV Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 3 of 16 65th Street at Southdale Medical Office east driveway — Side Street Stop NB Southdale Medical Office driveway approaching 65th St — one right/left EB 65th St approaching Southdale Medical .Office driveway — one right/through WB 65th St approaching Southdale Medical Office driveway -.one through /left 65th.Street at Drew Avenue - Side Street Stop_ SB Drew Ave approaching 65th St — one right, one through/left NB Drew Ave approaching 65th St — one right/through, one left EB 65th St approaching' Drew Ave — one right /through/left WB 65th St approaching Drew Ave — one right/through/left Drew Avenue at Southdale Medical Office parking ramp driveway - Side Street Stop SB Drew Ave approaching Southdale Medical Office driveway — one right /through NB Drew Ave approaching Southdale Medical Office driveway — one through, one left EB Southdale Medical Office driveway approaching Drew Ave - one right /left 66th Street at Drew Avenue /Southdale Center Access — Traffic Signal Control SB Drew Ave approaching 66th St — one right/through, one left NB Southdale Center Access approaching 66th St — inbound lanes only EB 66th St approaching Drew Ave — one right, two through, one left WB 65th St approaching France Ave — one right /through, two through, one left 66th Street at Southdale Medical Office Right- in/Right -out driveway — Side Street Stop SB Southdale Medical Office driveway approaching 66th St — one right WB 65th St approaching Southdale Medical Office driveway — one right /through, two through 66th Street at Southdale Medical Office Right -in only driveway — inbound only WB 65th St approaching Southdale Medical Office driveway — one right /through, two through AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts and daily hourly approach counts were conducted during the week on April 1, 2013 and the week of June 10, 2013. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. Figure 3 shows the existing intersections and driveways along each corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study, with the existing 2013 AM and PM peak hour and traffic volumes. The traffic count data is included in the Appendix. Background (Non Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions (2013) and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. However; in order to account for some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period was used to project traffic to the 2015 and 2030 analysis years. A3'% t Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 4 of 16 In addition to the regional background traffic growth, other specific none development related traffic near the site was determined and included with the overall background traffic. These projects included: Fairview Southdale Hospital Expansion — The proposed plan includes the expansion of the emergency center, urgent care, behavioral health and observation area. The proposed expansion consists of a 77,500 sf (gross area), two -story building located on the north side of the existing hospital building. This project has been approved by the City Council. It is assumed that it will be completed in 2014 and included in the, background traffic for the 2015 and 2030 analysis. Edina Medical Plaza (6500 France Avenue) — The City recently approved the redevelopment of the properties in the southwest quadrant of France Avenue and 65' Street. The proposed site included redevelopment.of both the 6500 France Avenue site and the 4005 65th Avenue site with a five story 96,500 sf medical office building with an attached 3 story parking structure. However, recently the City was presented a revised site plan changing the use on the site to a 209 unit senior housing and skilled.care facility. This proposal is currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. With this change, it is assumed that this project will not be open and will not be included with 2015 analysis but, will be fully developed and included in the 2030 background traffic. Southdale Residential.- The City recently.approved the addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking lot. The site is located in the northwest quadrant of 69th Street and York Avenue. This project is currently under construction. It is assumed that the project -will be open and is included as.part of the 2015 and 2030 background traffic. Additional Southdale Mall Development - Based on the information received from Southdale Center about the current vacancy rates and plans for renovations, it was determined that following the renovations, the mall would have an additional. 143,880 sf of leasable space available. This figure includes leasable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all leasable space will be occupied and included in the background. traffic for the 2015 and 2030 analysis. Future Restaurant Development — A future restaurant is anticipated in the northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 69th Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 sf in size with approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will not be developed by 2015 but, will be open and included and included as part of the 2030 background traffic. The estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table I. The trip generation rates used to estimate the additional development traffic is based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip-Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The table shows the AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. A31 Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 5 of 16 Table l - Estimated Additional Background Trip Generation Use Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Hospital Expansion 77,500 sf 36 21 15 24 10 14 Senior Housing 209 units 27 18 9 40 18 22 Apartments 232 units 118 24 94 144 94 50 Shopping Center 143,880 sf 138 86 52 533 256 277 Restaurant 8000 sf 87 48 39 79 47 32 Total New Trips 1 406 197 1 209 1 820 425 395 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Site Expansion Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed site expansion is shown below in Table 2. The trip generation rates used to estimate the proposed site traffic are based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition. The table shows the total daily, AM peak hour and PM. peak hour trip generation for the proposed site. Table 2 - Estimated Expansion Trip Generation — ITE Rates Use Size S ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Medical Office 1 60 1 2168 1084 1084 144 1 114 1 30 215 60 155 (1) - Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Traffic Distribution Background and site - generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve the area. In general the Trip Distribution was assumed: • 30% to the north • 40% to the south • 15% to the east • 15% to the west AqO Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 6 of 16 The additional background trips from adjacent developments were assigned to 65th Street, 66th Street, Drew Avenue and. France Avenue based on the overall directional distribution and ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. The generated trips for the proposed-Southdale Medical Office expansion were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on 65th Street, 66th Street and Drew Avenue and circulate through the site. These trips .were assigned based on the ratio of existing traffic patterns on each respective roadway. Future Year. Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2015 which is the year after the-proposed expansion would be completed and assumed to be fully occupied and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame.,Three improvement alternatives were evaluated. 1. Existing .Conditions — Assumes existing lane configuration and traffic control. 2. No =Build — Assumes existing lane configuration and traffic control, without' the proposed Southdale Medical Office expansion. 3. Build — Assumes existing lane configuration and traffic control with the proposed Southdale Medical Office expansion. The traffic forecasts were prepared, by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non - development background traffic growth to the existing 2013 traffic counts to determine the "No- Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated Southdale Medical Office expansion traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 4 - 7 shows the projected 2015 and 2030 No -Build and Build AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Operations Existing and /or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the impacted intersections and access driveway adjacent to the hospital. The analysis was conducted for the following scenarios. I . Existing 2013 Conditions 2. Projected 2015 No Build 3. Projected 2015 Build 4. Projected 2030 No Build 5. Projected 2030 Build This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. Ast Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 7 of 16 Analysis Methodolozy The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating -at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign - controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and /or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through- street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un- signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The threshold LOS values for un- signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM Af+a Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un- Signalized A <10 5 10 B 10 -20 10-15 C 20 -35 15 -25 D 35-55 25-35 E 55-80 35-50 F > 80 >50 Source: HCM Af+a Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 8of16 LOS, as described above,,can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low _traffic.volume as compared to the volume on the other legs For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could resulfin a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while. benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes,. could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance. of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas.. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: • Synchro, a software package.that implements Highway`Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each.signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- moyement volumes, lane geometries, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used -to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. , • SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and' driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. Existinz Level of Service Summary Table 4, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operating at an overall LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours with all movements operating at LOS E or better. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. �� J i Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 9 of 16 Table 4 - Existing Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2015 which is the year after the proposed Southdale Medical Office expansion would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5 and 6. Detailed tables showing the LOS and delays by approach are included in the Appendix. Table 5 — Forecasted No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2015 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existin conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the major intersections on France Avenue at 65t Street and 66th Street and on 66th Street at Drew Avenue /Southdale entrance. By 2030 the analysis indicates that at the intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue potential. issues on the 65th Street approaches and France Avenue left turns may exist. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. A4� AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Overall Overall LOS Delay LOS Delay sec /veh sec /veh France Ave at 65th St C (D) 20.9 C (E) 22.55 France Ave at 66th St C (D) 22.5 C (D) 25.1 65t St at Southdale Medical Office A (A) 4.5 A (C) 6.6 west driveway / Hospital entrance 65t St at Southdale Medical Office A (A) 2.3 A (A) 2.4 east driveway 65th St at Drew Ave. A (A) 6.6 A (A) 5.6 Drew Ave at Southdale Medical. A (A) 0.8 A (A) 1.6 Office driveway 66th St at Drew Ave C (D) 24.7 C (D) 24.5 6-6tSt at Southdale Medical Office A (A) 1.5 A (A) 1.5 Right-in/Right-out 661 St at Southdale Medical Office A (A) 1.3 A (A) 1.7 Right -in only C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2015 which is the year after the proposed Southdale Medical Office expansion would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5 and 6. Detailed tables showing the LOS and delays by approach are included in the Appendix. Table 5 — Forecasted No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2015 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existin conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the major intersections on France Avenue at 65t Street and 66th Street and on 66th Street at Drew Avenue /Southdale entrance. By 2030 the analysis indicates that at the intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue potential. issues on the 65th Street approaches and France Avenue left turns may exist. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. A4� Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 10 of 16 Table S - Forecasted No Build Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 - Forecasted Build with Soutdale Medical Office Expansion, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2015 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours with some movements at LOS E. Similar to the Forecasted No -Build conditions the intersection of 65`h Street and France Avenue will have potential delay issues. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. In addition the intersection of 65`h Street and the Southdale Medical Office/Hospital Entrance driveway will experience increased delays, although they do not indicate a need for potential mitigation. The analysis of the relocated and combined access on 66th Street does not indicate any issues for traffic exiting the site. There are sufficient gaps in westbound traffic from the signal at Drew Avenue to allow vehicles to access 66`h Street and cross to the left lane to turn south on France Avenue. Aq-T 2015 2030 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Overall Overall Overall Overall LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay sec /veh sec /veh sec /veh sec /veh France Ave at 65th St C (D) 21.5 C (E) 23.3 C (D) 25.7 D (E) 36.2 France Ave at 66`h St C (D) 23.1 C (D) 26.6 C (D) 24.5 C (E) 25.0 65` St at SMO west driveway / Hospital A (A) 4.3 A (C) 7.6 A (C) 5.6 C (E) 32.6 entrance 65t St at SMO east A (A) 2.1 A (A) 2.5 A (A) 2.2 A (C) 9.4 driveway 65th St at Drew Ave A (A) 6.6 A(A) 5.9 A (A) 7.6 A(B) 8.0 Drew Ave at SMO A (A) 0.8 A (A) 1.6 A (A) 0.9 A (A) 1.7 driveway 66th St at Drew Ave C (D) 24.5 C (D) 25.0 C (D) 24.4 C (D) 23.9 66th St at SMO Right- A (A) 1.4 A (A) 1.4 A (A) 1.4 A (A) 1.6 in/Right -out 66` St at SMO Right -in A (A) 1.3 A (A) 1.8 A (A) 1.4 A(A) 2.0 only C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 - Forecasted Build with Soutdale Medical Office Expansion, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2015 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours with some movements at LOS E. Similar to the Forecasted No -Build conditions the intersection of 65`h Street and France Avenue will have potential delay issues. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. In addition the intersection of 65`h Street and the Southdale Medical Office/Hospital Entrance driveway will experience increased delays, although they do not indicate a need for potential mitigation. The analysis of the relocated and combined access on 66th Street does not indicate any issues for traffic exiting the site. There are sufficient gaps in westbound traffic from the signal at Drew Avenue to allow vehicles to access 66`h Street and cross to the left lane to turn south on France Avenue. Aq-T J � Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 11 of 16 Table 6 - Forecast Build with Hospital Expansion C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Vehicle Oueuinz Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2015 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at the intersections in the study area. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, and future no- build and build 2015 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases however, for the 2030 no -build and build conditions, the maximum queues were exceeded, specifically; on 65th Street between France Avenue and the Southdale Medical Office west driveway/Hospital Entrance . The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were typically identified one or two times during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 4 to 6 seconds. The potential future mitigation at the 65th Street and France Avenue intersection discussed above will improve the flow of traffic on 65th Street and also minimize traffic blocking the Southdale Medical Office west driveway/Hospital Entrance. Additional signage could also be added indicating "do not block intersection" and /or "no left turns during peak hours" should this A� V 2015 2030 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Overall Overall Overall Overall LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay sec /veh sec /veh sec /veh sec /veh France Ave at 65th St C (D) 22.6 C (E) 32.8 C (D) 28.2 D (E) 36.6 France Ave at 66th St C (D) 22.85 C (D) 26.3 C (D) 24.6 C (E) 29.7 65t St at SMO / Hospital A (C) 5.4 C (D) 22.6 A (D) 7.5 D (E) 33.1 west driveway 65" St at SMO east A (B) 2.5 A (C) 4.1 A (A) 2.7 A (C) 8.4 driveway 65th St at Drew Ave A (A) 6.8 A(B) 5.5 A (B) 7.2 A(B) 6.5 Drew Ave at SMO A. (A) 0.9 A (A) 1.7 A (A) 0.9 A (A) 1.7 driveway 66th St at Drew Ave C (D) 23.2 C (D) 24.8 C (D) 22.7 C (D) 26.7 66t St at SMO Right- A (A) 2.3 A (A) 3.1 A (A) 2.3 A (A) 3.2 in/Right-out 66 St at SMO Right -in NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA only C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Vehicle Oueuinz Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2015 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at the intersections in the study area. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, and future no- build and build 2015 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases however, for the 2030 no -build and build conditions, the maximum queues were exceeded, specifically; on 65th Street between France Avenue and the Southdale Medical Office west driveway/Hospital Entrance . The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were typically identified one or two times during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 4 to 6 seconds. The potential future mitigation at the 65th Street and France Avenue intersection discussed above will improve the flow of traffic on 65th Street and also minimize traffic blocking the Southdale Medical Office west driveway/Hospital Entrance. Additional signage could also be added indicating "do not block intersection" and /or "no left turns during peak hours" should this A� V Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 12 of 16 become an issue. Tables showing the average and maximum queue lengths by movement and approach are included in the Appendix. Parking Impact Analysis The parking impacts to the existing Southdale Medical Office Campus were analyzed based on the current use of the site and anticipated expansion. Currently there is one primary parking structure located adjacent to Drew Avenue and surface spaces located throughout the site. The proposed plan removes some surface parking spaces to accommodate the building expansion and new entrance modifications. In addition the proposed parking ramp will be reconstructed to add additional parking spaces. Table 7 below shows a summary of the existing and proposed parking available on the site. These locations are shown on the site plan in Figure 2. Table 7 —Available Parking Location Existing Spaces Proposed Spaces Surface Spaces 513 397 Parking Ramp 741 1180 [Total Parking Spaces 1254 1577 In order to provide a base line of the parking demand for the site, the existing parking utilization was counted in June 2013. Table 8 shows the average and peak number of occupied spaces throughout the site. Currently the site has an average utilization of 74% and a peak utilization of 81%. Table 8 — Current Parking Utilization Location Average Occupied Spaces Peak Occupied Spaces Surface Spaces 450 494 Parking Ramp 482 517 Total Parking Spaces 932 1011 Based on the City Code the existing Southdale Medical Office Campus would require approximately 1407 parking spaces. With the proposed expansion the site would require 1715 parking spaces. Based on these requirements a parking variance would be required for 153 and 138 spaces respectively. Table 9 shows the required parking based on the City Code. 0-1 Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 13 of 16 Table 9 —Parking Required per City Code Use Existing Parking Proposed Parking Medical Office 273,000 sf Re uired 333,000 sf Required Medical Office 273,000 sf 1365 333,000 sf 1665 Medical Office 42 Doc/Dent 42 50 Doc/Dent 50 Total Parking Spaces Required 1407 1715 The parking demand for the site was also estimated based on the parking surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4`" Edition. Table 10 below shows a summary of what the anticipated peak parking demand would be for a typical weekday. This would represent the worst case condition for the parking on the site assuming the existing and proposed uses. Table 10 — Parking Demand per ITE Use Existing Parking R ed Proposed =red Parking Medical Office 273,000 sf 1166 333,000 sf 1422 Based on the above parking summaries, there is and would be sufficient parking available on site for the proposed Southdale Medical Office Campus expansion. With a peak utilization of 81% indicating a need for 1390 parking and an ITE parking demand indicating a need for 1422 parking spaces, it can be concluded that the 1577 parking spaces being provided with this plan would be adequate, even though the City Code requires 1715 parking spaces. In addition, the developer has identified a "proof of parking" plan for an additional 175 parking spaces by adding a fifth level of the parking ramp. With this additional parking, the site would meet City Code and would not need any parking variances, now or with the proposed expansion. Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed Southdale Medical Office Expansion project includes the construction of an additional 60,000 sf of medical office and parking ramp expansion. The site is anticipated to generate an additional 144 trips in the AM peak hour and 214 trips in the PM peak hour. 4`ff5 Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 14 of 16: • Additional trips will be generated from other approved or anticipated development in the surrounding area. These uses will generate an additional 406 trips in the AM peak hour and 820 trips in the PM peak hour. • Existing traffic operations at the intersections and driveways in the study area on 65tth Street, Drew Avenue and 66th Street are all operating at overall LOS D or better for the both the AM and PM peak hours. o Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2015 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the AM and PM peak hours. However, some movements, specifically at the 65th Street,and France Avenue intersection.will be operating at LOS E. By 2030 the analysis indicates that at the intersection may have potential issues on the 65th Street approaches and France Avenue left turns. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane lengths and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C. • Intersection traffic operations for the Forecasted Build alternative (with the Southdale Medical Office Expansion traffic) in 2,015 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. Similar to the Forecasted No -Build conditions the intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue may have potential delay issues. With the minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized_ , improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C. • The results of the queuing analysis found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, and future no -build and build 2015 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases however, for the 2030 no -build and build, conditions, the maximum queues were exceeded, specifically; on 65t1' Street between France Avenue and the Southdale medical Office/Hospital Entrance driveway. The potential future mitigation at the 65th Street and France Avenue intersection will improve the flow of traffic on 65th Street and also minimize traffic blocking the Southdale Medical Office/Hospital Entrance driveway. Additional signage could also be added at the driveway should this become an issue. • The developer would be required to secure access modification approval from Hennepin County for the proposed access changes on 66th Street. • . The existing or proposed available parking does not or will not meet the City's Code with the current parking conditions or with the proposed Medical Office Campus Expansion. With the proposed Medical Office expansion 1715 parking spaces would be required based on City Code. The current plan provides for 1577 parking spaces. This would require a variance for 138 parking spaces. The proposed plan includes prof of parking for 175 parking spaces with the addition of a fifth level to the parking ramp, which would bring the site into compliance and would not require a variance. 1"Mr Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 15 of 16 • Based on the current parking utilization and the ITE parking generation estimates the total parking needed for the :Southdale Medical Office Campus site would range between . 1390 and 1422 spaces. With these estimates, no parking variance would be required. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Provide the proposed site access and circulation improvements as shown on the proposed site plan (Figure 2). 2. Although no improvements to the France Avenue at 65th Street intersection are specifically required at this time. Should delays and queuing become an issue in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Southdale Medical Office will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 3. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed Southdale Medical Office Campus Expansion project. A S"O r H Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina August 22, 2013 Page 16 of 16 APPENDIX Asj N O C v w V ` UJ O7N1 EW a w> CH OWEN g�� a a (q A a D a CU RVE Q R� D W. 62 C ST. T DDD D D 2nd 5� 3, W. � 62 nd ST. '`� � 4 w x o ,,J a (q a a z a RRI SON w o w w aa = a _ 0 700 ft 1400 ft 35. o 36.. '•µ` 't o w w L.. > > a a v=i J `n ro W, a ST. > 64 th ST. a [MMNF A 64 th ST, p z r W, 64th a w w w ■..4 a > _ W. 0 3 OD ,i a a a a ■ } a W. z o 65 the ST. Z ssth ST. w Z � 0_ Z J C� � • .. _ c-, Project Location a w ■ J w Lake ° a� IIm h D 5T. LO a z W. 66th o .S UD _ i Cornelia a QDo ■ ■ ■� ■ ■... SOUTH ALE a o ti Study Area �p CIR. C\J ��� CD NA 68 th c m ROYCA r� OR. S T. 0 [ BALFANZ o Q TON UPpe RD. �F� �P• a > UJ �A Wf TER- zo JUDS pN �' � O �lq 69th C r�RO Al ~n �� ; � L z (JJ ��� W. 69th ST. ° ST, WA a Q z Q w Q Q 000000 0 Qq 38. ONNeERRY U o Zq•a O Q J Dp G ° 70th o > `J w ST. . � W. DD�D a � O o R .> �� a aQ > LAR,t =ANDOVER D a A�AVELL E w~ sAG N U ZDDD wD ASPgs� P CL4R VIDERE LA. o _ fo DR• HAZELTON RO• x� 9 v ORe C w ° v _ Y w TRf� �q ASPASJA 07R ZgRf " o a o o x Lca �° `rGM CIR. OUNygM 0C4y MORE W. cJa = `d 72 nd ST. (y w F/qV - m o S a D Creek HIBISCUS o 3 fC�SWORTH o� DR. w v �ITO( z Q ¢ = q J d AVE. �� J O FON a > a M 0 0 DELL DR. W in w_ DR 0 2: W ~ r o PHLOx GILFORD DR. � o 0 z m LA. a wU o= J X w 4th HIBISCUS > Y > J a CT. o ST. a a a 0 PARKLAWN AVE. ST. AVE. ° 0 o SEDUM o W. 75th o QOPPY SORE 1.A w QP� PLAZA r > LA. Y a G W. 76th _cam ST. �- "ll BLVD. Us DU W' Y ae 77th ST. 1 � > VIKING w DR. Ln r ° 1� t" <t Traffic and Parking Study Figure e }� Southdale Medical Campus Expansion ,.rt City of Edina, Minnesota Project Location Map ^S3 CL n• 111111!!_ 'I \ it I V ', . �' I InGbrval6n NL s C200 Traffic and Parking Study Figure 2 Southdale Medical Campus Expansion City of Edina, Minnesota Proposed Site Plan ^S3 I 179(376) a + 43 ( 96) 50(51) (131) 73 -0 �j ttP ( 93)196 (108) 37 ... �- 18 ( 15) 1 ry + 187 (350) + 11 ( 12) ( 24) 63 + (148) 346 + o a ( 82) 208 .. 6 •►t • 0 ( 0) s s s o a o 213(292) � 58( 3) (o)o Y (187)265 o ( 3) 95 il9i� _r 14u 1 4 toy 1# +IA4 299 ►� �h -t't1 s 309) '¢ 224) » fr p+t Lh'.:f -.i� •1 �• e" �: �A 28 ( 2) 0 0 r 659 ( 832) o r ~ 0 ( 0) 4. Traffic and Parking Study ° e Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Yr'•"NZ �,•ay City of Edina, Minnesota AS•4' 77 ( 23) o 658 (741) 4H •J 0 ( 0) 23 ( 8) M1 r, + 117(103) +/ r 32(41) ( 45)139 9 �. ( 83) 68 + (100) 61 '" V 0 ( 0) 01 0) ,i 0 ( 0) ( 11) 1 ry t (0)0; s ( 40) 6 .-. — 153 (46) e ,,, �• 675(757) 4 or 38 (120) ( 30) 52 -0 727)254 -# ( 57) 24 7 Figure 3 Existing Conditions LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection OSignalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area ® All -Way Stop Intersection v�tF Intersection Lane Geometry AM (PM) Turning 100(200 ) Movement Volumes 77 ( 23) o 658 (741) 4H •J 0 ( 0) 23 ( 8) M1 r, + 117(103) +/ r 32(41) ( 45)139 9 �. ( 83) 68 + (100) 61 '" V 0 ( 0) 01 0) ,i 0 ( 0) ( 11) 1 ry t (0)0; s ( 40) 6 .-. — 153 (46) e ,,, �• 675(757) 4 or 38 (120) ( 30) 52 -0 727)254 -# ( 57) 24 7 Figure 3 Existing Conditions 28 ( 2) — 77 ( 23) -- 153 ( 46) 0 0 0 o V t-• 673(832) ,,, ° 672(741) a .,, +•- 689(757) °' F t` .— 0 ( 0) .! 0 ( 0) .i 4 it 38 (120) ( 30) 52 .0 ( 727) 254 ( 57) 24 N V q ZA. Traffic and Parking Study °(e to Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Figure 4 2015 No Build Conditions •.�,W City of Edina, Minnesota g5 S LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection OSignalized Intersection ( Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area MINNESOTA ® All -Way Stop Intersection �tP Intersection Lane Geometry 187(388) la 15)) AM (PM) Turning m �' 44(98) N N .�- 796(363) N 100(200) Movement Volumes 411 4 56 ( 57) .t• 11 ( 12) ^e (134) 75 1 t 1 j ( 26) 68 0 0 ( 0) ? 95 200 ( ) (157) 363 •�+ ° o 0 222 ( 305) 23 ( 8) (110) 38 _, ( 84) 212 58 ( 3) — — 126(116) 0) 0 m �. 32 ( 28) F 's M (197)282 1 *� (45)139 �j P 3) 95 ( 93) 85 + — p 0( 0) L 157(285 h • !11'r.s _ ___ -:'tea "" .� `V v m .�-- 267(315) *J11 L r 249(232) ;. 1 3 q ^s.14. ,• * *� 11 f t (361)) 204 t i #* ..y�., 8" w =a1 R { 0) 0 ; o ( 87) 39 -11 .,� '•'Z' �:. R _. ilk _66th ., 28 ( 2) — 77 ( 23) -- 153 ( 46) 0 0 0 o V t-• 673(832) ,,, ° 672(741) a .,, +•- 689(757) °' F t` .— 0 ( 0) .! 0 ( 0) .i 4 it 38 (120) ( 30) 52 .0 ( 727) 254 ( 57) 24 N V q ZA. Traffic and Parking Study °(e to Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Figure 4 2015 No Build Conditions •.�,W City of Edina, Minnesota g5 S I .r i 201(426) / 1 + szfta) ill 4 61(68) (134) 75 J `j tt . (107) 220 i' (110) 39 " It ti 1571285 r 261(315) �ll ti 258 ( 279) ( 83) 95 J ti tt (361)204 ) ( 87) 39 N A � A. ,1T 4 � Traffic and Parking Study 11 �(e Southdale Medical Campus Expansion `• �,�..•• City of Edina, Minnesota 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) (16) z � i (0)o; ( 54) 8 -� 167 ( 51) 712 (769) I& Ir 38 (120) ( 33) 61 ( 727) 254 ( 57) 24 N Figure 5 2015 Build Conditions LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection Signalized Intersection "+ ,.�� 1 ✓' Signalized Intersection ♦ / � Outside Study Area 1�'J•y7 "tip yl. �i 0 ( 0) YEMINNESOTA ® All -Way Stop Intersection Intersection Lane Geometry 18(15) AM (PM) Turning e + 207(392) 100(200) Movement Volumes + 13 (17) (26) 68 T 0 ( O) 7w w (160) 384+ o o e 224 (310. 23 ( 8) iz (120) 257 — 72 ( 4) n Z_ — + 126 (116) N r ( 0) 0 N 34 (29) o (211)284 L (45)139 ry r (93)85+ (128) 64 A. ,1T 4 � Traffic and Parking Study 11 �(e Southdale Medical Campus Expansion `• �,�..•• City of Edina, Minnesota 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) (16) z � i (0)o; ( 54) 8 -� 167 ( 51) 712 (769) I& Ir 38 (120) ( 33) 61 ( 727) 254 ( 57) 24 N Figure 5 2015 Build Conditions ♦ / � 128 ( 37) o ° ,., o o �, 674 (755) 1�'J•y7 "tip yl. �i 0 ( 0) A. ,1T 4 � Traffic and Parking Study 11 �(e Southdale Medical Campus Expansion `• �,�..•• City of Edina, Minnesota 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) (16) z � i (0)o; ( 54) 8 -� 167 ( 51) 712 (769) I& Ir 38 (120) ( 33) 61 ( 727) 254 ( 57) 24 N Figure 5 2015 Build Conditions 28 ( 2) 77 ( 23) - 177 ( 5`d 4•44'-' „, 766(945) ,� o - F 765(856) e F 717(826) F” 0 0 0 O1 « F 0( 0) 0( 0) V r 44 (139) ( 37) 60 J ( 843) 295 ,.~• o o s ( 66) 28 ' t Traffic and Parking Study ° e y Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Figure 6 �•'' ,� 2030 No Build Conditions „..n• City of Edina, Minnesota Asp LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection ,r O Signalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area t'MINNESOTA er` All -Way Stop Intersection �1P Intersection Lane Geometry 1 -- $ 213(440) 20(17) AM (PM) Turning n+ 50(111) f + 224 (413) 1oot2oo� Movement Volumes dii ti 63 ( 64 + 13 ( 14) T (152) 85 .0 ttr}► ( 28) 74 + 0( 0) ? (108) 227 (179) 414 + e e 254 ( 359) 25 ( 10) (125) 43 58 ( 3) - - a 130(152) y .. 11 . • ( 0) 0 Y �/ �• 37 ( 32) �1ki54::U1,ti�• 11y; e M (255) 335 '- (53)159 • • V ( 3) 95 (127)108 + (116) 71 L 119(324 ►'- .. ;h'c4 P ^Sf e 304 358 4~- 1 ) h 1�4 r.E• ty ■� '- 0( 0) 4i �.i� 7il ti ,� 283(263) of o) - ( 941107 ttr+ • ' o 28 ( 2) 77 ( 23) - 177 ( 5`d 4•44'-' „, 766(945) ,� o - F 765(856) e F 717(826) F” 0 0 0 O1 « F 0( 0) 0( 0) V r 44 (139) ( 37) 60 J ( 843) 295 ,.~• o o s ( 66) 28 ' t Traffic and Parking Study ° e y Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Figure 6 �•'' ,� 2030 No Build Conditions „..n• City of Edina, Minnesota Asp v 227(478) 58 (137) .ill 4 68 ( 75) (152) 85 .0 tt►- (120) 247 m (125) 43 L 179 (3241 304(358) r 292 (310) (94)107 ti tt� (411)232 _ ( 99) 44 N i 20(17) \ « — + 235(442) rt+ 15 (19) ( 28) 74 T (182) 435 + m (131)286 `- •. i 4 nL 0 0 0 ( 0) a o 256(364) o 72( 4) (0) 0 V (269) 337 0 o e o ( 6) 116 Traffic and Parking Study J� } Southdale Medical Campus Expansion ••4,�n�..•• City of Edina, Minnesota o ( a) .! 0( 0) ( 16) 2 'j t (0)0; ( 54) 8 V m -� 191 ( 60)\ r 800(638) .! r 44(139) ( 40) 69 -0 ( 843) 295 ( 66) 28 N \ I Figure 7 2030 Build Conditions LEGEND 121 ,1 Thru -Stop Intersection © Signalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area ® All -Way Stop Intersection fit!' Intersection Lane Geometry AM (PM) Turning 100(200 ) Movement Volumes .$ 4. i. 4� ski 1 — � �i 25 ( 1) • o e 130( 1 R) �+ 39 ( 33) ( 53)159 q t+ (127) 108 + 3 Traffic and Parking Study J� } Southdale Medical Campus Expansion ••4,�n�..•• City of Edina, Minnesota o ( a) .! 0( 0) ( 16) 2 'j t (0)0; ( 54) 8 V m -� 191 ( 60)\ r 800(638) .! r 44(139) ( 40) 69 -0 ( 843) 295 ( 66) 28 N \ I Figure 7 2030 Build Conditions 121 ,1 off .$ 4. j r�; ski 1 — � �i >_ �.. _„ • 'rl �• 128(37) 767 (870) Traffic and Parking Study J� } Southdale Medical Campus Expansion ••4,�n�..•• City of Edina, Minnesota o ( a) .! 0( 0) ( 16) 2 'j t (0)0; ( 54) 8 V m -� 191 ( 60)\ r 800(638) .! r 44(139) ( 40) 69 -0 ( 843) 295 ( 66) 28 N \ I Figure 7 2030 Build Conditions 0 0 ( o) s s 0 0 256(364) o 4r 72 ( 4) ( 0) 0 Y (269)337 o e (6)116 V — LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection © t'MINNESOTA� Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area ® All -Way Stop Intersection rj1jw Intersection Lane Geometry ,rT■ AM (PM) Turning 100(200) 4: Movement Volumes _ _ t t , i6 2 292 ♦ ( 94)101 J t ♦(310) r'' A (411)232 ! 227 ( 478) .• ^tt 0 _ 20 ( 17) .- 58 137 ( 1 ' — � + 235 (442) '!la V r 68 ( 75) + 15 ( 19) (152) 85 .0 1 11 ♦ j ( 28) 74 + (120) 247 9 (1821435 V - a (125) 43 — (131)286 F 0 ( o) s s 0 0 256(364) o 4r 72 ( 4) ( 0) 0 Y (269)337 o e (6)116 V — LEGEND Thru -Stop Intersection © Signalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Outside Study Area ® All -Way Stop Intersection rj1jw Intersection Lane Geometry ,rT■ AM (PM) Turning 100(200) 4: Movement Volumes 0 ( o) s s 0 0 256(364) o 4r 72 ( 4) ( 0) 0 Y (269)337 o e (6)116 V — r %�� Traffic and Parking Study ° e ' y r Southdale Medical Campus Expansion �Yl City of Edina, Minnesota riF 128 ( 37) o « 767 (R70) �i 0 ( 0) 25 (10) E < + 130(152) 4i t. 39 ( 33) ( 53)159 'j t► (127)108 + (144) 74 U( 0) .! 0 ( 0) ( 16) 2 It t 1 0) 0 o ( 54) 8 V — -, 191 ( 60) ^i e � F 800(638) w i P. r 44 (139) ' ( 40) 69 J (843)295 y o s 166) 28 Figure 8 2030 Build Conditions with Mitigated Lane Geometry i rRA. _ t 179(324 - -; r ,rT■ — t F 304(356) - - �M"' -�F- � _ _ t t , i6 2 292 ♦ ( 94)101 J t ♦(310) r'' A (411)232 ! ! ia't'4� r " "' E 1'3 ,g A r !� : r %�� Traffic and Parking Study ° e ' y r Southdale Medical Campus Expansion �Yl City of Edina, Minnesota riF 128 ( 37) o « 767 (R70) �i 0 ( 0) 25 (10) E < + 130(152) 4i t. 39 ( 33) ( 53)159 'j t► (127)108 + (144) 74 U( 0) .! 0 ( 0) ( 16) 2 It t 1 0) 0 o ( 54) 8 V — -, 191 ( 60) ^i e � F 800(638) w i P. r 44 (139) ' ( 40) 69 J (843)295 y o s 166) 28 Figure 8 2030 Build Conditions with Mitigated Lane Geometry France Ave & 66th St 6 -9, 11 -1, 3 -6 Edina, MN WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : fance & 66th Site Code : 00000104 Start Date : 1/10/2007 Page No : 1 07:00 AM 7 80 20 France Ave 12 105 17 07:30 AM 8 66th St W 07:45 AM 8 161 19 France Ave 35 488 77 66th St W 13 161 32 08:15 AM 9 130 25 From North 8 155 35 * ** BREAK * ** From East Total 30 446 92 From South 12:45 PM 8 From West 45 Total 45 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds A .Taicl Right Thru Left Peds A .Tomt Ri ht Thru Left Peds A T-i Right Thru Left Peds A .Toms Int.Tont 06:00 AM 0 35 8 0 43 9 3 6 0 18 3 21 2 0 26 3 12 4 0 19 106 06:15 AM 3 35 7 0 45 11 10 6 0 27 11 34 1 0 46 0 10 11 0 21 139 06:30 AM 6 58 12 0 76 20 23 14 0 57 12 59 2 0 73 5 22 8 0 35 241 06:45 AM 2 60 13 0 75 21 30 13 0 64 22 47 1 0 70 7 34 10 0 51 260 Total 11 188 40 0 239 61 66 39 0 166 48 161 6 0 215 15 78 33 0 126 746 07:00 AM 7 80 20 07:15 AM 12 105 17 07:30 AM 8 142 21 07:45 AM 8 161 19 Total 35 488 77 08:00 AM 13 161 32 08:15 AM 9 130 25 08:30 AM 8 155 35 * ** BREAK * ** 54 Total 30 446 92 * ** BREAK * ** 11:00 AM 10 192 45 11:15 AM 15 182 43 11:30 AM 12 165 46 11:45 AM 7 175 49 Total 44 714 183 12:00 PM 10 177 65 12:15 PM 15 176 54 12:30 PM 12 159 51 12:45 PM 8 208 45 Total 45 720 215 * ** BREAK * ** 03:00 PM 9 134 62 03:15 PM 13 161 78 03:30 PM 10 141 64 03:45 PM 21 153 43 Total 53 589 247 04:00 PM 18 156 72 04:15 PM 8 192 63 04:30 PM 10 149 61 04:45 PM 11 147 46 Total 47 644 242 05:00 PM 18 152 69 05:15 PM 17 143 74 05:30 PM 10 167 67 05:45 PM 19 143 82 Total 64 605 292 Grand Total 329 4394 1388 Apprch % 5.4 71.9 22.7 Total % 1.6 22 6.9 0 107 22 36 24 0 82 12 62 2 0 76 4 26 7 0 37 302 0 134 26 51 28 0 105 13 66 2 0 81 3 44 16 0 63 383 0 171 47 73 52 0 172 16 93 3 0 112 8 48 20 0 76 531 0 188 35 81 62 0 178 17 66 4. 0 87 10 50 10 0 70 523 0 600 130 241 166 0 537 58 287 11 0 356 1 25 168 53 0 246 1739 0 206 1 38 69 60 0 167 19 76 4 0 99 14 42 11 0 67 539 0 164 30 47 46 0 123 20 99 8 0 127 7 I 57 21 0 85 499 0 198 35 38 48 0 121 26 102 4 0 132 7 51 19 0 77 528 0 568 1 103 154 154 0 411 1 65 277 16 0 358 1 28 150 51 0 229 1 1566 0 247 54 43 70 0 167 40 138 24 0 202 26 41 12 0 79 695 0 240 58 30 55 0 143 38 157 21 0 216 33 55 20 0 108 707 0 223 64 52 71 0 187 62 150 30 0 242 29 60 8 0 97 749 0 231 44 59 66 0 169 59 171 27 0 257 33 67 11 0 111 768 0 941 220 184 262 0 666 199 616 102 0 917 1 121 223 51 0 395 2919 0 252 60 55 76 0 191 53 158 43 0 254 31 68 14 0 113 810 0 245 64 65 82 0 211 62 218 28 0 308 30 . 60 14 0 104 868 0 222 60 59 73 0 192 47 183 33 0 263 21 67 18 0 106 783 0 261 68 52 80 0 200 47 191 33 0 271 33 65 11 0 109 841 0 980 252 231 311 0 794 209 750 137 0 1096 115 260 57 0 432 3302 0 205 44 68 19 0 131 59 186 72 0 317 6 59 18 0 83 736 0 252 .43 64 29 0 136 60 208 58 0 326 12 46 17 0 75 789 0 215 52 82 56 0 190 55 187 69 0 311 23 67 7 0 97 813 0 217 70 58 70 0 198 50 189 38 0 277 21 78 13 0 112 804 0 889 209 272 174 0 655 224 770 237 0 1231 62 250 55 0 367 3142 0 246 31 88 66 0 185 49 163 24 0 236 25 69 19 0 113 780 0 263 61 60 46 0 167 61- 189 32 0 282 14 66 9 0 89 801 0 220 51 75 59 0 185 76 185 34 0 295 24 77 14 0 115 815 0 204 64 77 64 0 205 64 163 28 0 255 20 80 15 0 115 779 0 933 207 300 235 0 742 250 700 118 0 1068 83 292 57 0 432 3175 0 239 68 88 63 0 219 84 228 46 0 358 17 104 23 0 144 960 0 234 63 69 38 0 170 55 230 45 0 330 24 93 13 0 130 864 0. 244 52 76 53 0 181 51 180 23 0 254 30 87 6 0 123 802 0 244 58 51 35 0 144 47 190 38 0 275 21 95 7 0 123 786 0 961 241 284 189 0 714 237 828 152 0 1217 92 379 49 0 520 3412 0 6111 1 1423 1732 1530 0 4685 1 1290 4389 779 0 6458 541 1800 406 0 2747 20001 0 30.4 37 32.7 0 20 68 12.1 0 19.7 65.5 14.8 0 0 30.6 7.1 8.7 7.6 0 23.4 6.4 21.9 3.9 0 32.3 2.7 9 2 0 13.7 A60 WSB &- Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 66th St 6-9,11-1, 3 -6 Edina, MN File Name : fance & 66th Site Code :_00000104 Start Date :1/10/20017 Page No 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 _ M--;— na. z n. A TI A . ln). Total 07:30 AM France Ave From North 66th St W From East France Ave From South 66th St W- From West Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds A T-1 Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I Aep. Towl I Right, I Thru I Left I Peds I A- T..) Ri ht Thru I Left I Peds I APP.Toul Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 _ M--;— na. z n. A TI A . ln). Total 07:30 AM 8 142 21 0 171 47 :73 52 0 172 16 93 3 0 112 8 48 .20 0. 76 531 07:45 AM 8 161 19 0 188 35 81. 62 0 178 17 66 4 0 87 10 50 10 0 70 523 08:00 AM 13 161 32 _ 0 206 38 69 60 0 161 19 76 4 0 99 14 42 11 0 67 539 08:15 AM 9 130 25 0 164 30 47 46 0 123- 20 99 8 0 127 7 57 21 0 85 499 Total Volume 38 594 97_ 0 729 150 270 220 0 640 72 334 19 0 425 39 197 62 0 298 2092 % App. Total .5.2 81.5 _ . 13.3 _ 0 23.4 42.2 34.4 0 16.9 78.6 4.5 0 13.1 . 66.1 20.8 0 PHF. 1 .731 .922 ..758 .000 . .885 1 .798 .833 .887 .000 .899 1 .900 .843 .594 .000 .837 .696 .864 .738 .000 .876 .970 France Aver Out In — Total_ 54-61 9 F12751 38 594 97 0 Right Thai Left Peds Peak Hour Data +, T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 19 334 721 0 0 Out In Total F- P A— A61 " - t t-� , o North Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A o o co fO � r �� Uns ifted r �x o oy v 0 om o a � �+ o +, T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 19 334 721 0 0 Out In Total F- P A— A61 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 66th St 6-9,11-1, 3 -6 Edina, MN File Name : fance & 66th Site Code : 00000104 Start Date : 1/10/2007 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM -Peak 1 of 1 Ponle T-Tnor fnr Fntire Tntersertinn Begins at 12'00 PM Int. T.I.I. 12:00 PM France Ave 66th St W France Ave 66th St W 252 From North From East From South From West Start Time Rig Thr Left Ped ^W *^� Rig Thr Ped Left �r� Right Thr Left Peds app.ro� Right Thr Left Peds App.Tonl 245 ht u 82 s 211 ht u s 0 308 u 60 14 0 u 868 Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM -Peak 1 of 1 Ponle T-Tnor fnr Fntire Tntersertinn Begins at 12'00 PM Int. T.I.I. 12:00 PM 10 177 65 0 252 60 55 76 0 191 53 158 43 0 254 31 68 14 0 113 810 12:15 PM 15 176 54 0 245 64 65 82 0 211 62 218 28 0 308 30 60 14 0 104 868 12:30 PM 12 159 51 0 222 60 59 73 0 192 47 183 33 0 263 21 67 18 0 106 783 1145 PM 8 208 45 0 261 68 52 80 0 200 47 191 33 0 271 33 65 11 0 109 841 Total volume 45 720 215 0 980 252 231 311 0 794 209 750 137 0 1096 115 260 57 0 432 3302 % App. Total 4.6 73.5 21.9 0 31.7 29.1 39.2 0 19.1 68.4 12.5 0 26.6 60.2 13.2 0 PHF .750 .865 .827 .000 .939 1 .926 .888 .948 .000 .941 1 .843 .860 .797 .000 .890 .871 .956 .792 .000 .956 .951 4C'I France Ave Out In Total 059 980 L 2039 451 7201 2151 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data F� _j ? O North p C — Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 P Cn rD E N Unshifted _V n V a] F+ Left Thru Riaht Peds 1371 7501 2091 0 146 096 2242 Out In Total 4C'I France Ave & 66th St File Name : france & 66th 6 -9, 11 -1, 3 -6 Site Code 00000104 Edina, MN Start Date : 1/10/2007 Page No 4 Nt. Totul Peak Hour Analysis. From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 _a I—_ r__ _C ;_... p.....__.:.... De.. 7....... /1A.10 DAR ... .. .. . . 04:30 PM France Ave 66th St W France Ave 66th St W 220 From Nort h From East From South From West Start Time Rig I Thr. Left Ped �*� Rig :.Thr Ped Left ,�r� Right Thr Left Peds npp.Tout' Right :. Thr Left Peds App.Toul. 204 ht u 64 s 205 ht 163 s 0 255 h . 80 15 0 u 779 Nt. Totul Peak Hour Analysis. From 02:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 _a I—_ r__ _C ;_... p.....__.:.... De.. 7....... /1A.10 DAR ... .. .. . . 04:30 PM 10 149 61 V 0 220 51 .75 59 0 185 76 185 34 0 295 24 77 14 0 115 815 04:45 PM 11 147 46 0 204 64 77 64 0 205 64 163 28 0 255 20 . 80 15 0 115 779 05:00 PM 18 152. 69 0 239 68 88 63 0 219 84 228 46 0 358 .17 .104 23 0 144 960 05715 PM 17 .143 74 0 234 63 69 38 .0 170 55 230 45 0 330 .' 24 93 13 0 130 864 Total Volume 56 591 250 0 897 246 309 224 0 779 279 '806 153. . 0 1238 85 354 65 0 504 3418 % App. Total 6.2 65.9 27.9 0 31.6 39.7 28.8 0 22.5 65.1 12.4 0 16.9 70.2 12.9 0 PHF .778 .972 :845 .000 .938 .904 .878 .875 .000 .889 .830 .876 .832 .000 .865 .885 .851 .707 .000 .875 .890 > � J O � U) C (O 0� O m v a France Ave Out In Total 1117 897 1 2014 561 5911 250 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04 :30 P U shifted 14 Left Thru Riaht Peds 1531 806 2791 0 900 1238 2138 Out In Total France Ave A3 N �m m� W � —2 2.� W O OO J � j � (rD N O CD mm N O N — France Ave & 65th St 6:30 79:30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 30's France Ave 06:30 AM 35 63 61 06:45 AM 40 72 84 Total 75 135 145 07:00 AM 19 93 48 07:15 AM 27 132 68 07:30 AM 18 134 56 07:45 AM 19 172 64 Total 83 531 236 08:00 AM 19 143 51 08:15 AM 26 173 54 08:30 AM 24 161 58 08:45 AM 21 156 54 Total 90 633 217 09:00 AM 23 195 55 09:15 AM 26 157 60 Total 49 352 115 03:30 PM 14 171 44 03:45 PM 11 190 29 Total 1 25 361 73 04:00 PM 14 163 34 04:15 PM 6 180 24 04:30 PM 6 178 19 04:45 PM 10 196 27 Total 36 717 104 05:00 PM 6 165 18 05:15 PM 5 197 12 05:30 PM 6 194 12 05:45 PM 5 212 15 Total 22 768 57 06:00 PM 6 168 15 06:15 PM 7 193 17 Grand Total 393 3858 979 Apprch % 7.5 73.8 18.7 Total % 2.8 27 6.9 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St 0 159 10 4 1 0 196 15 4 4 0 355 1 25 8 5 0 160 29 3 1 0 227 33 8 3 0 208 45 12 2 0 255 36 13 5 0 850 143 36 11 0 213 38 15 5 0 253 52 13 15 0 243 54 12 15 0 231 49 9 19 0 940 193 49 54 0 273 61 18 12 0 243 60 10 13 0 5161 121 28 25 France Ave 0 15 8 41 17 0 23 15 72 19 0 38 23 113 36 0 33 12 77 14 0 44 23 76 20 0 59 18 93 34 0 54 29 115 34 0 190 82 361 102 0 58 20 116 25 0 80 26 124 27 0 81 30 123 13 0 77 35 139 16 0 296 111 502 81 0 91 32 141 16 1 84 33 137 14 1 1751 65 278 30 0 2291 98 30 15 0 1431 15 241 19 0 2301 100 29 19 1 1491 27 268 15 0 4591 198 59 34 1 292 1 42 509 34 0 211 100 26 20 0 146 10 258 13 0 210 83 17 19 2 121 22 270 8 0 203 110 36 14 0 160 14 251 12 0 233 92 16 9 0 117 18 309 12 0 857 385 95 62 2 544 64 1088 45 0 189 102 25 15 2 144 16 334 10 0 214 68 18 12 0 98 19 344 10 0 212 56 22 8 0 86 9 274 17 0 232 47 3 11 0 61 5 248 11 0 847 273 68 46 2 389 49 1200 48 1 190 33 3 1 0 37 6 275 8 0 217 51 7 3 0 61 10 289 5 1 5231 1422 353 241 6 2022 452 4615 389 0 70.3 17.5 11.9 0.3 8.3 84.6 7.1 0 36.6 10 2.5 1.7 0 14.2 3.2 32.3 2.7 It'l/ � File Name : fance ave & 65th s. Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page No : 1 65th St 0 66 2 17 4 0 106 2 32 5 0 1721 4 49 9 0 103 6 35 14 0 119 3 43 20 0 145 9 42 13 0 178 4 54 15 0 545 22 174 62 0 161 9 52 11 1 178 6 50 22 0 166 13 51 21 0 190 9 35 13 1 695 37 188 67 0 1891 9 24 17 0 184 8 36 21 0 3731 17 60 38 0 23 263 0 39 364 0 62 1 627 0 J73 351 0 456 0 476 0 560 0 1843 0 J293 504 0 589 0 575 1 556 1 2224 0 50 1 603 0 65 576 0 115 F 1179 0 275 24 45 39 0 108 755 0 310 20 25 25 0 70 759 0 5851 44 70 64 0 1781 1514 0 281 26 29 44 0 99 737 0 300 20 27 31 0 78 709 0 277 26 26 43 0 95 735 0 339 23 17 26 0 66 755 0 1197 95 99 144 0 338 2936 0 360 38 23 33 0 94 787 0 373 21 18 29 0 68 753 0 300 13 13 19 0 45 643 0 264 8 15 21 0 44 601 0 1297 80 69 102 0 251 1 784 0 289 15 12 23 0 10 566 0 304 10 3 15 0 28 610 1 5457 324 724 524 1 1573 14283 0 20.6 46 33.3 0.1' 0 38.2 2.3 5.1 3.7 0 11 tvntutaapull. rvnv. France Ave & 65th St File Name : fance ave & 65th st 6:30 -9:30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Site Code 00000001 Edina, MN Start Date 2/22/2012 30'.s Page No :2 ` Int. Total Peak Hour.Analysis From:06:30 AM to 11:45 AM France Ave From North 65th St From East France Ave From South 65th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App.Tca Right Thru Left Peds App.,.w Right Thru Left Peds App.T.W Right Thru Left Peds App,Totzl Int. Total Peak Hour.Analysis From:06:30 AM to 11:45 AM -, Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:15 AM 08:15 AM, 26 173 54 -, 0 253 52 13 15 0 80 26 124 27 1 178 6 50 22 0 78 589 08:30 AM' 24 161 58 0 243 54 12 15 0 81 30 123 13 0 166. 13 51 21 0 85 575 08:45 AM 21 156f . 54 0 231 49 9 19 0 .77 35 139 16 0 190 9...' 35 13 1 58, 556 09:00 AM 23 195 •55 0 273 61 18 12 0 91 32 141 16 0 189 9 24 17 0 50 603 Total Volume 94 685 221 0 1000 216 52 61 0 329_ 123 527 72 1 723 37 160 73 1 271 2323 % App. Total 9:4 68.5 221 0 65.7 15.8 18.5 0 17 72.9 10 0.1 - 13.7 59 26.9 0.4 PHF .904 .878 .953...000 .916 .885 .722 .803 .000 .904 .879 .934 .667 .250 .951 .712 .784 .830 .250 .797 .963 France Ave Out In Total 816 .'.1000 1816 941 6851 2211 0 7ht Th Left Peds Peak Hour Data 4 � =� t F J C' North t0 .2c -� Peak Hour Begins at 08:15 AM � M L m m Unshifted j� N O v a 1 +i T r Left Thru Ri hl Peds 527 1231 1 783 723 1506 Out In Total France Ave ,�G S N � -2 2 N � W � � r m rM rn aJ n_ WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 65th St 6:30 -9:30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 30's File Name : fance ave & 65th st Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page No :3 Inl. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 France Ave From North 65th St From East France Ave From South 65th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds I App.Total Right Thru Left I Peds App.ToW Right Thru Left Peds App.T.W Inl. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 �s T w wo H J ^�` N Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM _ — Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 6 178 19 0 203 110 36 14 0 160 14 251 12 0 277 26 26 43 0 95 735 04:45 PM 10 196 27 0 233 92 16 9 0 117 18 309 12 0 339 23 17 26 0 66 755 05:00 PM 6 165 18 0 189 102 25 15 2 144 16 334 10 0 360 38 23 33 0 94 787 05:15 PM 5 197 12 0 214 68 18 12 0 98 19 344 10 0 373 21 18 29 0 68 753 Total Volume 27 736 76 0 839 372 95 50 2 519 67 1238 44 0 1349 108 84 131 0 323 1 3030 France Ave Out In Total 839 2580 27 736 76 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 6 �s T w wo H J ^�` N North _ — Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM O 0, to O N U s'fte rx0 O O O N N �O d N N O 4-, T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 1 441 12381 671 0 694 9 2243 Out In Total A6( 65th St & Southdale Hospital 6 -9 am & 37.6pm Edina, MN 1686 -380 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : 65th st & parking lot Site Code :00000005 Start Date 4/2/2013 Page No : 1 k67 Southdale Hospital 65th St Southdale Hospital 65th St From North From East 3 0 From South 0 4 From West 18 0 0 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds . Towl Right Thru Left Peds ram Ri ht Thru Left Peds romi Ri ht . Thru Left I Peds App. Todl IOC. rOldl 06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 13 7 0 22 30 06:15 AM 4 0 0 0 4 1 6 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 6 47 9 0 62 74 06:30 AM 4 0 2 0 6 3 10 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 2 9 60 19 0 88 109 06:45 AM. 6 0 1 0 7 1 20 0. 0 21 0 1 1 0 2 25 76 24 0 125 155 Total 14 0 3 0 17 5 43 1 0 49 0 2 3 0 5 42 196 59 0 297 368 k67 07:00 AM 3 0 1 0 4 3 18 0 0 21 0 1 6 0 7 18 65 15 0 98 130 07:15 AM 4 0 2 0 6 5 31 1 0 37 1 1 5 0 7 12 76 11 0 99 149 07:30 AM 2 0 1 0 3 1 49 2 0 52 3 0 8 0 11 29 79 10 0, 118 184 07:45 AM 5 2 1 0 8 4- 36 6 0 46 0 0 11 0 11 43 91 19 0 153 218 Total 14 2 5 0 21 13 134 9 0 156 4 2 30 0 36 102 311 55 0 468 681 08:00 AM 7 0 1 0 8 5 25 1 0 31 2 0 9 0 11 46 70 18 0 134 184 08:15 AM 6 0 2 0 8 2 42 1 0 45 0 0 13 0 13 53 96 15 0 164 230 08:30 AM 6 0 1 0 7 4 49 1 0 54 7 0 28 0 35 66 89 11 0 166 262 08:45 AM 4 1 2 0 7 1 30 4 0 35 2 0 28 0 30 55 64 9 0 128 200 Total 23 1 6 0 30 12 146 7 0 165 11 0 78 0 89 220 319 53 0 592 876 03:00 PM 18 0 1 0 19 3 70 1 0 74 15 1 30 0 46 40 38 9 0 87 226 03:15 PM 14 0 3 0 17 3 54 4 0 61 16 0 45 0 61 37 45 11 0 93 232 03:30 PM 18 0 1 0 19 0 88 2 0 90 13 2 33 0 48 34 48 2 0 84 241 03:45 PM 14 0 2 0 16 1 68 3 0 72 21 1 27 1 50 29 38 . 15 0 82 220 Total 64 0 7 0 71 7 280 10 0 297 65 4 135 1 205 140 169 37 0 346 919 04:00 PM 15 0 0 0 15 2 84 1 0 87 9 0 36 0 45 20 35 7 1 63 210 04:15 PM 8 0 0 0 8 5 79 4 0 88 5 0 29 0 34 18 37 2 0 57 187 04:30 PM 6 0 0 0 6 4 84 2 0 90 5 0 38 0 43 15 38 0 0 53 192 04:45 PM 8 0 0 0 8 3 76 1 0 80 6 0 24 0 30 17 42 0 0 59 177 Total 37 0 0 0 37 14 323 8 0 345 25 0 127 0 152 70 152 9 1 232 766 05:00 PM 7 0 0 0 7 2 72 2 0 76 7 0 18 0 25 16 31 0 0 47 155 05:15 PM 5, 1 0 0 6• 2s 49 . 3 0 54 5 0 11 0 16 14. _29 0 0 43 119 05:30 PM 5 0 2 0 7 1 47 1 0 49 4 0 9 0 13 9 25 4 0 38 107 05:45 PM 9 1 0 0 10 2 32 1 0 35 3 2 21 0 26 10 24 8 0 42 113 Total 26 2 2 0 30 7 200 7 0 214 19 2 59 0 80 49 109 12 0 170 494 Grand Total 178 5 23 0 206 58 1126 42 0 1226 124 10 432 1 567 623 1256 225 1 2105 .4104 Apprch % I 86.4 2.4 11.2 0 4.7 91.8 3.4 0 21.9 1.8 76.2 0.2 29.6 59.7 10.7 0 I Total % 4.3 0.1 0.6 0 5 1.4 27.4 1 0 29.9 3 0.2 10.5 0 13.8 15.2 30.6 5.5 0 51.3 k67 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Southdale Hospital 6 -9 am & 3 -6pm Edina, MN 1686 -380 File Name : 65th st & parking lot Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 4/2/2013 Page No : 2 Inl. Total Peak Hour Analysis from Ub:UU AM 10 11:40 AM - veaK 1 Of 1 Southdale Hospital From North 65th St I From East Southdale Hospital I From South 65th St I From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I AEp.T..l I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Toel I Right I Thru I Left I Peds LAPP, Toel I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. ToW Inl. Total Peak Hour Analysis from Ub:UU AM 10 11:40 AM - veaK 1 Of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 5 2 1 0 8 4 36 6 0 46 0 0 11 0 11 43 91 19 0 153 218 08:00 AM 7 0 1 0 8 5 25 1 0 31 2 0 9 0 11 46 70 18 0 134 184 08:15 AM 6 0 2 0 8 2 42 1 0 45 0 0 13 0 13 53 96 15 0 164 230 08:30 AM 6 0 1 0 7 4 49 1 0 54 7 0 28 0 35 66 89 11 0 166 262 Total Volume 24 2 5 0 31 15 152 9 0 176 9 0 61 0 70 208 346 63 0 617 894 0/ Aoo_ Total 77.4 6.5 16.1 0 8.5 86.4 5.1 0 12.9 0 87.1 0 33.7 56.1 10.2 0 Southdale Hospital Oft_ n Total r 781 3 2 5 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data North ° W c —� -2 N m Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 A E 4 lo ° t O1 rA Unshifted � N to � �O 'o fD W m +, T r Let Thru Riaht Peds 6 0 91 0 ® 0 28 OutIn Total 4K 65th St &Southdale Hospital File Name : 66th st & parking lot 6 -9 am & 376pm Site Code :.00000005 Edina, MN Start Date : 4/2/2013 1686 -380 Page No 3 1 Total Peak Hour Analysis, From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Southdale Hospital 65th St Southdale,Hospital 65th St From North From From South From West Start Time Rig I Thr Left Ped qoo Rig Thr .0 Ped Left �o:ad :Right Thr Left Pads ppp,romi Ri ht g Thr Left Peds App. .TMI ht u s 03:00 PM. =18 0 r. "1 0 _ 14 3 fit 1 s 74 15 u 30 0 .46 u 38 9 1 Total Peak Hour Analysis, From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM 03:00 PM. =18 0 r. "1 0 _ 14 3 70 1 0 74 15 1 30 0 .46 40 38 9 0 87 226 03:15 PM 14 0 13 0 17 3 54 4 0 61 16 0 45 0 61 37 45 11 0 93 232 03:30 PM 18 0 1 0 19 0 88 2 0 90 13 2 33 0 48 34 48 2 0 84 241 03:45 PM 14 0 2 0 16 1 68 3 0 72 21 1 27 1 50 29 38 15 0 82 220 Total Volume 64 0 7 0 71 7 280 10 0 297 65 4 135 1 20.5 140 169 37 0 346 919 % App. Total 90.1 0 9.9 0 2.4 94.3 3.4 0' 31.7 2 65.9 0.5 40.5 48.8 10.7 0 PHF 1 .889 .000 .583 .000 .934 .583 .795 .625 .000 .825 1 .774 .500 .750 .250 .840 .875 .880 .617 .000 .930 .953 Southdale Hospital Out In Total 48 1 119 0 0 �ht Th Left Peds Peak Hour Data o �f- J 2 North co � r —► 05S L — Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 P r O .. y Unshifte � O y O a. 4, T r Left Thru Ri ht ads 1351 41 651 1 150 205- 355 Out In Total Rnufhdale Hnsnital AGE+ WO —2 w rn 2 m N 0 N J a �- y O WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & S entrance (E of France) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -45 File Name : 65th st & S entrance (site 1) Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 6/11/2013 Page No : 1 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 65th St 0 42 0 S entrance (E of France) 0 0 0 65th St 32 0 0 45 87 07:15 AM From North 0 0 0 0 From East 26 21 0 From South 2 0 0 F on West .2 29 58 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds I App. Total Int. Total 06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 16 0 0 19 28 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 18 43 0 0 61 74 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 2 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 15 59 0 0 74 94 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 5 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 13 64 0 0 77 107 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 13 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 49 182 0 0 231 303 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 11 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 13 32 0 0 45 87 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 21 0 47 2 0 0 0 .2 29 58 0 0 87 136 07:30 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 68 12 1 81 0 0 0 2 2 30 65 0 1 96 181 07:45 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 44 18 0 62 0 0 0 1 1 19 66 0 1 86 150 Total 0 0 0 3 3 0 169 62 1 232 2 0 0 3 5 91 221 0 2 314 554 08:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 50 13 0 63 1 0 1 0 2 20 67 0 2 89 155 08:15 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 52 15 0 67 2 0 2 0 4 26 53 0 2 81 154 - 08:30 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 54 9 3 66 2 0 0 4 6 15 53 0 0 68 142 08:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 39 10 0 49 2 0 1 0 3 10 56 0 0 66 120 Total 0 0 0 7 7 0 195 47 3 245 7 0 4 4 15 71 229 0 4 304 571 03:00 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0 68 1 0 69 2 0 16 3 21 1 62 0 2 65 159 03:15 PM 0 0 0 4 4 0 69 3 0 72 4 0 8 1 13 2 66 0 1 69 158 03:30 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 104 4 0 108 8 0 13 5 26 2 58 0 0 60 195 03:45 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0 50 2 1 53 4 0 6 3 13 2 35 0 0 37 105 Total 0 0 0 11 11 0 291 10 1 302 18 0 43 12 73 7 221 0 3 231 617 04:00 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 86 1 0 87 10 0 26 2 38 0 55 0 0 55 183 04:15 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 73 1 0 74 6 0 16 1 23 2 52 0 0 54 154 04:30 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0 68 0 0 68 16 0 23 1 40 1 49 0 1 51 161 04:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 60 1 1 62 9 0 20 4 33 0 52 0 0 52 148 Total 0 0 0 9 9 0 287 3 1 291 41 .0 85 8 134 3 208 0 1 212 646 05:00 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 74 4 0 78 19 0 35 0 54 0 43 0 1 44 179 05:15 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0 54 2 2 58 6 0 10 0 16 2 34 0 1 37 113 05:30 PM 0 0 0 8 8 0 55 0 0 55 8 0 11 0 19 0 34 0 0 34 116 05:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 32 1 0 33 4 0 6 3 13 0 33 0 0 33 80 Total 0 0 0 14 14 0 215 7 2 224 37 0 62 3 1021 2 144 0 2 1481 488 Grand Total 0 0 0 44 441 0 1216 142 8 1366 105 0 194 30 3291 223 1205 0 12 1440 3179 Apprch °h 0 0 0 100 0 89 10.4 0.6 31.9 0 59 9.1 15.5 83.7 0 0.8 Total °h 0 0 0 1.4 1.4 0 38.3 4.5 0.3 43 3.3 0 6.1 0.9 10.3 7 37.9 0 0.4 45.3 A 70 07:30 AM WSB .& Associates 0 0 2 701 Xenia Ave S 0 68 12 Minneapolis, MN 81 0 65th St & S entrance (E of France) 0 File Name : 65th st & S entrance (site 1) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm 65 Site Code :00000001 Edina, MN .181 Start Date : 6/11/2013 1686 -45 0 Page No -.3 0 44 18 65th St 62 0 - 0 65th St - S entrance (E of France) 19 66 0 1 From North - 150 From East From South 0 0 From West 1 0 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total Right Thru Left I Peds I App. Total I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 20 67 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 68 12 1 81 0 0 0 2 2 30 65 0 1 96 .181 07:45 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 44 18 0 62 0 0 0 1 1 19 66 0 1 86 150 08:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 50 13 0 63 1 0 1 0 2 20 67 0 2 89 155 08:15 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 52 15 0 67 2 0 2 0 4 26 53 0 2 81 154 Total Volume 0- 0 0 6 6 0 214 58 1 273 3 0 3 3 9 95 251 0 6 352 640 % App. Total 0 0 0 100 0 78.4 21.2 0.4 33.3 0 333 33.3 27 71.3 0 1.7 PHF .000 .000 .000 .750 .750 .000 .787 .806 .250 .843 .375 .000 .375 .375 .563 .792 -.937 .000 .750 .917 .884 h -f l WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & S entrance (E of France) File Name : 65th st & S entrance (site 1) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Site Code : 00000001 Edina, MN Start Date : 6/11/2013 1686 -45 Page No : 4 Out- In otal Right Tflru Lefl Peds Peak Hour Data North a —► ~2 _ m 5 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A ,N m m ° Lln.,h tied Left Thru r� o Rloht s Out In Total VO, 65th St & S entrance (E of France) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -45 From North Start Time i Right I Thru I Left I Peds npr Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM -Peak' WSB &Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneanolis- MN ru: ivumC . OOltl JL 6t J CIIl1d1lGe (SIIC 1) Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 6/11/2013 Page No : 5 St S entrance (E of France) 65th St 04:00 PM 0 . 0 - 0 3 3 0 86 1 0 87 10 0 - 26 2 38 0 55 0 0 55 183 04:15 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 73 1 0 74 6 0 16 1 23 2 52 0 0 54 154 04:30 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0 68 0 0 68 16 0 23 1 40 1 49 0 1 51 161 04:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 60 1 1 62 9 0 20 4 33 0 52 0 0 52 148 Total Volume 0 0 0 9 9 0 287 3 1 291 41 0 85 8 134 3 208 0 1 212 646 % Apo. Total 0 0 0 100 0 98.6 1 0.3 30.6 0 63.4 6 1.4 98.1 0 0.5 PHF .000 .000 .000 .750 .750 .000 .834 .750 .250 .836 .641 .000 .817 .500 .838 .375 .945 .000 .250 .964 .883 A-73 6 79 am and 3 =6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -45 Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 6/11/2013 Page No : 6 Right Th Lgft Peds, Peak Hour Data 1 . GJ Nor . N C-� 5 _ _ Peak Hour Begins at 04:0 gP S r' —PI -i T r i d Out In Total A71 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Drew Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN . 1.686 -38 File Name : 65th st & drew ave Site Code :00000006 Start Date 4/3/2013 Page No :1 07:00 AM 9 Drew Ave 0 0 15 65th St 9 4 0 Drew. Ave 1 13 16 0 65th St 5 10 21 0 From North 98 07:15 AM From East 8 4 0 From South 4 17 6 From West 27 1 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds .Tnfa� Right Thru Left Peds A .Toni Ri hl Thru Left' Peds 'n .rams Ri ht Thru Left Peds Am ToW 'Int.Total 06:00 AM 1 1. 0. 0 2 2 4 IT 0 7 0 .'5 1, 0 6 `4 5 11 0 20 35 06:15 AM 1 3 0 0 4 4 5- 2 0 11 0. A 1. 11 0 22- - 3 '6 .. 20 0. 29 66 06:30 AM 5 2 1 0 8 3 9 4 0 16 0 24` 9 0 33 6 3 :. 44 0 53 110 06:45'AM 9 4 0 0 13 13 12 3 0 28 0 22 8 0 30 5 16 44 0 65 136 Total 16 10 1 0 27 22 30 10 0 62 0 62 29 0 91 18 30 119 0 167 1 347 07:00 AM 9 6 0 0 15 4 9 4 0 17 1 13 16 0 30 5 10 21 0 .. 36 98 07:15 AM 9 8 4 0 21 4 17 6 0 27 1 14 20 0 35. 8 21 28 0 57 140 07:30 AM 18 16 4 1 39 4 26 6 0 36 4 18 20 0 42 3 20 .36 0 59 176 07:45 AM. 13 7 1 0 21 8 29 6 0 43 1 29 29 0 59 12 22 50 0 84 207 Total 49 37 9 1 96 20 81 22 0 123 7 74 85 0 166 28 73 135 0 236 621 08:00 AM 21 11 0 0 32 3 25 13 0 41 4 24 17 0 45 14 25 21 0 60 178 08:15 AM 16 8 2 0 26 7 25 3 0 35 1 18 24 0 43 20 31 31 1 83 187 08:30 AM 20 8 2 0 30 5 23 10 0 38 3 .16 14 0 33 15 30 37 0 82 183 - 08:45 AM 10 6 1 0 17 4 21 1 0 26 3 6 10 0 19 9 18 32 0 59 121 Total 67 33 5 0 105 19 94 27 0 140 11 64 65 0 140 58 104 121 1 284 669 03:00 PM 34 22 4 0 60 5 24 ' 7 0 36 3 7 12 0 22 24 11 13 0 48 166 03:15 PM 34 14 2 1 51 0 26 6 0 32 4 11 12 0 27 25 23 17 0 65 175 03:30 PM 45 44 3 0 92 2 17 8 0 27 4 .. 10 16 0 30 25 21 22 0 68 217 03:45 PM 38 27 1 0 66 3 21 3 0 27 0 7 12 .: 0 19 28 16 15 0 59 171 Total 151 107 10 1 269 10 88 24 0 122 11 35 52 0 981 102 71 67 0 240 729 04:00 PM 30 24 4 0 58 1 25 8 0 34 3 4 10 0 17 28 14 14 0 56 165 04:15 PM 26 29 1 0 56 0 23 9 0 32 4 6 15 0 25 :'16 16 8 0 40 153 04:30 PM 49 22 5 0 76 4 34 8 0 46 5 5 12 0 22 28 16 8 0 52 196 04:45 PM 18 19 2 0 39 3 22 6 0 31 4 11 7 0 22 30 19 11 .0 60 152 Total 123 94 12 0 229 8 104 31 0 143 16 26 44 0 86 102 65 41 0 2081 666 05:00 PM 27 25 2 0 54 1 30 2 0 33 1 6 10 0 17 36 15 8 0 59 163 05:15 PM 23 _ 10 1 0 34 0 20 10 0 30 1 6 11 0 18 18 24 15 0 57 139 05:30 PM 19 15 0 0 34 1 16 13 0 30 1 7 6 0 14 26 23 13 1 63 141 05:45 PM 19 11 2 0 32 0 20 1 0 21 0 5 4 0 9 7 10 12 0 29 91 Total 88 61 5 0 154 2 86 26 0 114 3 24 31 0 58 87 72 48 1 2018, 534 Grand Total 494 342 42 2 880 81 483 140 0 704 1 48 285 306 0 639 395 415 531 2 1343 3566 Apprch % 56.1 38.9 4.8 0.2 1 11.5 68.6 19.9 0 7.5 44.6 47.9 0 1 29.4 30.9 39.5 0.1 Total % 13.9 9.6 1.2 0.1 24.7 2.3 13.5 3.9 0 19.7 1.3 8 8.6 0 17.9 11.1 11.6 14.9 0.1 37.7 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Drew Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -38 File Name : 65th st & drew ave Site Code : 00000006 Start Date : 4/3/2013 Page No :2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Drew Ave From North 65th St From East Drew Ave From South 65th St From West Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP. Total Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds A .Total Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds LApp.T.W Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP.T.W Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Drew Ave Total ®5 t70 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM T iht Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data Z 1 07:45 AM 13 7 1 0 21 8 29 6 0 43 1 29 29 0 59 12 22 50 0 84 207 08:00 AM 21 11 0 0 32 3 25 13 0 41 4 24 17 0 45 14 25 21 0 60 178 08:15 AM 16 8 2 0 26 7 25 3 0 35 1 18 24 0 43 20 31 31 1 83 187 08:30 AM 20 8 2 0 30 5 23 10 0 38 3 16 14 0 33 15 30 37 0 82 183 Total Volume 70 34 5 0 109 23 102 32 0 157 9 87 84 0 180 61 108 139 1 309 755 "/ Aoo. Total 64.2 31.2 4.6 0 14.6 65 20.4 0 5 48.3 46.7 0 19.7 35 45 0.3 P7 F Drew Ave Total ®5 t70 T iht Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data Z 1 W o N.C.. m o North F- -2 0 N o> N Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 A to Co rte— jR y s ito r �xN cn p N �O N 4, N O T F+ Left Right Peds 1 841 871 91 0 Out In Total P7 F WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 65th St & Drew "Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN. 1,686 -38 File Name : 65th st & drew ave Site Code :00000006 Start Date : 4/3/2013 Page No :3 Start Time Drew Ave 65th_ St Drew. Ave 65th St Rig From North From East. From South From West Right Thr Left Peds qpp, To al Right Thr Left Peds qpp, io a Int. Total ht u. s ht u s u O n u ~2 _ — Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM;to 05:45,PM - Peak 1 of 1 Start Time Rig Thr Left Ped Rig Thr Left Ped �,, nm Right Thr Left Peds qpp, To al Right Thr Left Peds qpp, io a Int. Total ht u. s ht u s u O n u ~2 _ — Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM;to 05:45,PM - Peak 1 of 1 (°n mo N � '.oc�, o y Unshifted r �; A n� rn O� °v m �d ti Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:MPM y 0 a — I I Left Thru Ri ht Peds 52 35 11 0 03:00 PM 34 22 4 0 60 5 24 7 0 36 3 7 12 0 22 24 11 13 0 48- 166 03:15 PM 34 1,4 2 1 51 0 26 6 0 32 4 11 12 0 27 25 23 17 0 65 175 03:30 PM 45 44 3 0 92 2 17 8 0 27 4 10 16 0 30 25 21 22 0 68 217 03:45 PM 38 27 1 0 66 3 21 3 0 27 0 7 12 0 19 28 16 15 0 59 171 Total Volume 151 107 10 1 269 _ 10 88 24 0 122 11 35 52 0 98 102 71 67 0 240 729, % App. Total 56.1 - 39.8 3.7 0.4 - 8.2 72.1 19.7 0 11.2 35.7 53.1 0 . 42.5 29.6 27.9 0 PHF .839 .608 .625 .250 .731 .500 .846 .750 .000 .847 1 .688 .795 .813 .000 .817 .911 .772 .761 .000 .882 1 .840 � 77 Drew Ave Out In Total 112 269 381 15 107 10 1 Right T� Left Peds Peak Hour Data 1� O n North ~2 _ — Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 P � (°n mo N � '.oc�, o y Unshifted r �; A n� rn O� °v m �d ti y 0 a — I I Left Thru Ri ht Peds 52 35 11 0 233 98 331 Out In Total A. � 77 WSB & Associates .701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Drew Ave, &Entrance (S of 65th St) _ File Name : Drew Ave & w entrance (site 2) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Site Code :00000002 Edina, MN Start Date 6/12/2013 1686 -45 Page No :1 Total 6. 35 Drew Ave 0. 42 0 0 Entrance 0 0' 1 98 Drew Ave 1 112 1 Parking lot Entrance 0 5 6 160 07:00 AM From North 9 0 0 11 From East 0 0 0 0 From South 26 4 0 From West 2 0 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total Int.Total 06:00 AM 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0. 9 1 0 10 0 0 0 .1 ... 1 16 06:15 AM 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 2 0 19 0 0 0 3' 3 28 06:30 AM 1 16 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 : 2 0 31 1 0 0 1. 2 50 OB 5 AM 3 10 1 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 1 52 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 1 0 1 1 48 9 1 591 2 0 0 3 5 93 08:15 AM 1 24 1 2 Total 6. 35 1 0. 42 0 0 .0 0 0' 1 98 12 1 112 1 0 0 5 6 160 07:00 AM 2 9 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 4 0 30 2 0 1 0' ' 3 44 07:15 AM 1 17 2 2 22 0 0 1 0 1 1 43 7 0 51 0 0 0 2 2 176 07:30 AM , 2 35 1 1 39 0 0 0 0 0 1. 44 4 0 49 1 0 0 1 2 90 ` 07:45 AM 6 27 1 1 35 2 0 0 0 2 0 57 8 0 65 2 0 1 0 3 105 Total 11 88 4 4 107 .2 0 1. 0 3 2 170 23 0 195 5 0 2 3 10 315 08:00 AM 3 24 0 1 28 0 0 1 0 1 1 48 9 1 591 2 0 0 3 5 93 08:15 AM 1 24 1 2 28 0 0 0 0 0 3 44 8 1 56 1 0 0 2 3 87 08:30 AM .4 29 1 1 35 0 0 1 0 1 0 40 4 0 44 4 0 0 0 4 84 08:45 AM 3 27 1 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 1 40 8 0 49 3 0 1 1 5 85 ,Total 11. 104 3 4 122 0 0 2 0 2 5 .172 29 2 2081 10 0 1 6 171 349 03:00 P.M 0 41 1 0 42 2 1 1 1 5 3 18 2 0 23 4 1 1 2 8 78 03:15 PM 2 46 1 0 49 2 0 4 0 6 3 25 1 0 29 ' 5 0 2 6 13 97 03:30 PM 0 59 1 1 61 0 0 1 0 1 3 23 1 1 28 6 0 2 3 11 101 03:45 PM 0 84 0 1 85 1 0 2 1 4 1 27 0 1 29 5' 0 1 2 8 126 Total 2 230 3 2 237 5 1 a 2 16 10 93 4 2 109 20 1 6 13 401 402 04:00 PM 2 .78 0 1 81 2 0 0 0 2 1 19 2 .. 0 22 10 0. 2 3 15 120 04:15 PM 1 73 0 2 76 0 0 3 0 3 1 23 2 0 26 4 0 2 .6 12 117 04:30 PM 0. 74 0 4 78 0 0 6 0 6 0 24 1 0 25 21 0 6 6 33 142 04:45 PM 0 64 0 0 64 1 0 1 1 3 0 21 2 0 23 7 0 2 4 13 103 Total 3 289 0 7 299 3 0 10 1 14 2 87 7 0 96 42 0 12 19 73 482 05:00 PM 0 66 0 5 71 1 0 1 0 2 0 14 0 0 14 11 0 8 1 20 107 05:15 PM 0 43 0 1 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 21 9 0 5 5 19 84 05:30 PM 0 .. 51 0. 1 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 0 18 4 .0 0 4. 8 78 05:45 PM 0 41 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 1 0 11 9 2 5 2 18 70 Total 0 201 0 7 208 1 0 1 0 2 1 61 2 0 64 33 2 18 12 651 339 Grand Total 1 33 947 11 24. 1015 11 1 22 3 37 21 681 77 5 784 111 3 39 58 211 2047 Apprch % 3.3 93.3 1.1 2.4 29.7 2.7 59.5 8.1 2.7 86.9 9.8 0.6 52.6 1.4 18.5 27.5 Total % 1 1.6 46.3 0.5 1.2 49.6 0.5 0 1.1 0.1 1.83 1 33.3 3.8 0.2 38.3 5.4 0.1 1.9 2.8 10.3 Alf 07:30 AM WSB & Associates 35 1 1 701 Xenia Ave S 0 0 0 Minneapolis, MN 0 1 Drew Ave & Entrance (S of 65th St) 4 File Name ; Drew Ave & w entrance (site 2) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm 0 Site Code : 00000002 Edina, MN 90 Start Date : 6/12/2013 1686 745 1 Page No : 3 2 0 0 Parking lot Entrance 2 0 Drew Ave 8 Entrance Drew Ave 2 0 1 0 From North 105 From East From South 24 0 From West 28 0 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds . Total Ri hl Thru Left Peds . T.0 Ri hl Thru Left Peds total Ri ht Thru Left Peds . Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM l0 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 0 0 3 07:30 AM 2 35 1 1 39 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 4 0 49 1 0 0 1 2 90 07:45 AM 6 27 1 1 35 2 0 0 0 2 0 57 8 0 65 2 0 1 0 3 105 08:00 AM 3 24 0 1 28 0 0 1 0 1 1 48 9 1 59 2 0 0 3 5 93 08:15 AM 1 24 1 2 28 0 0 0 0 0 3 44 8 1 56 1 0 0 2 3 87 Total Volume 12 '110 3 5 130 2 0. 1 0 3 5 193 29 2 229 6 0 1 6 13 375 % App. Total 92 84.6 2.3 3.8 66.7 0 33.3 0 2.2 84.3 12.7 0.9 46.2 0 7.7 46.2 PHF .500 .786 :750 .625 .833 .250 .000 .250 .000 .375 .417 .846 .806 .500 .881 .750 .000 .250 .500 .650 .893 h -7 1 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Drew Ave & Entrance (S of 65th St) File Name : Drew Ave & w entrance (site 2) 6 -9 am and 3-6 pm Site Code : 00000002 Edina, MN Start Date : 6/12/2013 1686 -45 Page No : 4 Drew Ave Total 1 3281 121 1101 31 51 Right Thru L@ft Petls Peak Hour Data North f -2 a Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A asps v o a Ur j �- e ON In Total ��V Drew Ave & Entrance (S of 65th St) 6 -9 am and 3 =6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -45 Drew Ave From North Start Time I Right I Thru I Len I Peds I App. Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis., MN File Name Drew Ave & w entrance (site 2) Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 6/12/2013 Page No : 5 Drew From 7 Thru Le App. Total I Int. Total 03:45 PM 0 84 0 1 85 1 0 2 1 4 1 27 0 1 29 5 0 1 2 8 126 04:00 PM 2 78 0 1 81 2 0 0 0 2 1 19 2 0 22 10 0 2 3 15 120 04:15 PM 1 73 0 2 76 0 0 3 0 3 1 23 2 0 26 4 0 2 6 12 117 04:30 PM 0 74 0 4 78 0 0 6 0 6 0 24 1 0 25 21 0 6 6 33 142 Total Volume 3 309 0 8 320 3 0 11 1 15 3 93 5 1 102 40 0 11. 17 68 505 % Arm. tal 0.9 96.6 0 2.5 20 0 73.3 6.7 2.9 91.2 4.9 1 58.8 0 16.2 25 PHF .375 .920 .000 .500 .941 .375 .000 .458 .250 .625 .750 .861 .625 .250 .879 .476 .000 .458 .708 .515 .889 W WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Drew Ave & Entrance (S of 65th St) File Name : Drew Ave & w entrance (site 2) 6-9 am and 3 -6 pm Site Code ; 00000002 Edina, MN Start Date : 6/12/2013 1686 -45, Page No : 6. T Left h Out In Totet l�� 2- i 66th St & Drew Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1.686 -38 WSB & Associates_ 701 Xenia.Ave S Minneapolis, MN Groups Printed- Unshifted File.Name : 66th`st & drew Site Code :.00.00000.7 Start Date : 4/4/2013 Page No :1 07:00 AM 3 Drew Ave 7 0 11 66th St 78 5 0 Drew Ave 0 0 0 0 66th St 6 29 5 0 40 From North 07:15 AM 7 From -East 6 0 14 From South 117 4 0 From West 0 0 0 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds rams Right Thru Left I Peds I App. real Ri ht Thru I Left I Peds Am TOW Ri ht Thru Left Peds App. roll Int.Total .06:00 AM 1 .1. ` "5 0. 7 7 27 2 0 36 0 0 0 ' 0 0 3. 14 1 0 18 61 06:15 AM 2 0 5 0 7 18 36 1 0 55 0 0 0 0 0. 5 1& ,. - 3 0. 24 86 06:30 AM .0 2 5, . 0 7 25 47 4 0. 76 0 0 0 0 0, 3 26 - 5 0 34 117 06:45 AM 2 1 6 0 9 29 46 3 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 3 44 Al 0 .58 145 Total 5 4 21 0 301 79 156 10 0 245 0 0 0 0 01 14 100 :20 0 134 f 409 07:00 AM 3 2. 1 7 0 11 26 78 5 0 .109 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 5 0 40 160 07:15 AM 7 1 6 0 14 35 117 4 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 2 53 5 0 60 230 07:30 AM 3 1 23 0 27 50 189 6 0 245 0 0 .0 0 0 6 56 9 6 71 343 07:45 AM 9 2 12 0 23 50 225 12 0 287 0 0 0 0 0 8 61 13 0 82 392 Total 22 5 48 0 75 161 609 27 0 797 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 199 32 0 253 1125 08:00 AM 2 2 15 0 19 27 171 11 0 209 0 0 0 0 0 6 73 15 0 94 322 08:15 AM 7 0 13 0 20 57 160 7 2 226 0 0 0 0 0 8 56 9 0 73 319 08:30 AM _ 14 1 16 0 31 19 119 8 0 146 0 0 -. 0 0 0 2 64 15 0 81 258 08:45 AM 6 4 20 0 30 30 99 18 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 4 72 22 0 98 275 Total 29 7 64 0 100 133 549 44 2 728 0 0 0 0 0 20 265 61 0 346 1174 03:00 PM 12 5 35 0 52 21 132 26 1 180 0 0 0 0 0 11 107 8 0 126 358 03:15 PM 19 6 40 0 65 23 162 22 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 10 84 11 0 105 377 03:30 PM 23 5 54 0 82 21 148. 41 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 11 105 7 0 123 415 03:45 PM 12 7 49 0" 68 11 180 21 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 12 104 10 0 126 406 Total 66 23 178 0 267 76 622 110 1 809 0 0 0 0 0 44 400 36 0 480 1556 04:00 PM 10 4 62 0 76 14 182 36 0 232. 0 0 0 0 0 4 . 138 14 0 156 464 04:15 PM, 17 2 51 0 70 8 184 24 1 217 0 0 0 0 0 6 146 9 0 161 448 04:30 PM 13 8 73 0 94 12 202 23 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 3 174 13 0 190 521 04:45 PM .9 4 47. 0 60 18 200 28 0 246 2 0 0 0 2 5 173 7 0 185 493 Total 49 18 233 0 300 52 768 111 1 932 2 0 0 0 2 18. 631 43 0 692 1926 05:00 PM 15 3 ` 51 0 69 9 176 34 0 219 0 0 0 0 0 12 204 6 0 222 510 05:15 PM 10 7 40 0 57 7 179 35 . 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 37 176 4 3 220 498 05:30 PM 7 4 27- 0 38 6 174 27 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 11 185 3 0 199 444 05:45 PM 8 5 31 0 44 5 165 24 0 194 0 0 5 0 5 12 155 5 0 172 415 Total 40 19 149 0 208 27 694 120 0 841 0 0 5 0 5 72 720 18 3 813 1867 Grand Total 211 76 693 0 980 1 528 3398 422 4 4352 2 0 5 0 7 190 2315. 210 3 2718 8057 Apprch % 21.5 7.8 70.7 0 12.1 78.1 - 9.7 0.1 28.6 0 71.4 0 I 7 85.2 7.7 0.1 I Total % 2.6 0.9 8.6 0 12.2 6.6 42.2 5.2 0 54 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 2.4 28.7 2.6 0 33.7 03 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 66th St & Drew Ave 6 -9 am & 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -38 File Name : 66th st & drew Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 4/4/2013 Page No : 2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:Q0 AM to 11:45 AM - F'eaK 1 OT 1 Drew Ave From North 66th St From East Drew Ave From South 66th St From West Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App.T.w Right I Thru I Left I Peds Tam Right I Thru I Left I Peds LAPP. Tom Right I Thru I Left Peds A .To al Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:Q0 AM to 11:45 AM - F'eaK 1 OT 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 3 1 23 0 27 50 189 6 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 6 56 9 0 71 343 07:45 AM 9 2 12 0 23 50 225 12 0 287 0 0 0 0 0 8 61 13 0 82 392 08:00 AM 2 2 15 0 19 27 171 11 0 209 0 0 0 0 0 6 73 15 0 94 322 08:15 AM 7 0 13 0 20 57 160 7 2 226 0 0 0 0 0 8 56 9 0 73 319 Total Volume 21 5 63 0 89 184 745 36 2 967 0 0 0 0 0 28 246 46 0 320 1376 % Am. Total 23.6 5.6 70.8 0 19 77 3.7 0.2 0 0 0 0 8.8 76.9 14.4 0 0 d � C ~ L _� O a Drew Ave ut n Total 89 5 63 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 1 North Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A U s i e 4, T r Left Riaht Peds 01 Ol 01 0 Out In Total nr— Av< pf A � 0 ~2 v o) CA CA r � � r' m '0 0 CD � m— N N 66th St & Drew Ave 6- 9am &3 -6pm Edina, MN 1686 -38 WSB &Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : 66th st & drew Site Code :.00000007 Start Date :4/4/2013 Page No :3 J _j F N 2 V% C I- L — � L O � CL Drew Ave Out In Total 76 280 1 356 471 221 2111 0 Right Thru Left Peds .Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P Unshifted *-, T r Left h R' ht Peds' 0 0 21 0 99 2 F 201 Out In Total n�- AVA Ass O OAI A 4' - 2 4 _ _m N � � r� N 0 m rn °y^ °. w — N � Drew Ave 66th St Drew Ave 66th St From North From East From South From West Start Time I R'g Thr Left Ped Rig Thr Ped Left w,.rm Right Thr Left Peds nPP.r °mi Right Thr Left Peds npP.r°mi ht u s u u J _j F N 2 V% C I- L — � L O � CL Drew Ave Out In Total 76 280 1 356 471 221 2111 0 Right Thru Left Peds .Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P Unshifted *-, T r Left h R' ht Peds' 0 0 21 0 99 2 F 201 Out In Total n�- AVA Ass O OAI A 4' - 2 4 _ _m N � � r� N 0 m rn °y^ °. w — N � Int. Total ht u s ht u s u u Peak Hour.Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45_ PM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04`.30 PM 13 8 73 0 941 12 202 23 . 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 3 .174 13 0 190 521' 04:45 PM 9 4 47 0 60 18 200 28 0 246 2 0 0 0 2 5 173 7 0 185 493 05:00 PM 15 3: 51 0 69 9 176 34 0 219 0 0 0 0 0 12 204 .6 0 222 510 05:15 PM 10 7 40 0 57 7 179 35 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 37 176 4 3 220 498 Total Volume 47..: 22 211 0 280 46 757 .120 0 923 2 0 0 0 2 57 727 30 3 817 2022 App. Lotal 16.8 7.9 75.4 0 5 82 13 0 100 0 0 0 7 89 3.7 0:4 PHF .783 .686 323 .000 .745 .639 .937 .857 .000 .938 .250 .000. .000 .000 .250 .385 .891 .577 .250 .920 .970 J _j F N 2 V% C I- L — � L O � CL Drew Ave Out In Total 76 280 1 356 471 221 2111 0 Right Thru Left Peds .Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P Unshifted *-, T r Left h R' ht Peds' 0 0 21 0 99 2 F 201 Out In Total n�- AVA Ass O OAI A 4' - 2 4 _ _m N � � r� N 0 m rn °y^ °. w — N � WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 66th St & 2nd Entrance (E of France) File Name : 66th st & N entrance (site 3) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Site Code : 00000003 Edina, MN Start Date : 6/11/2013 1686 -45 Page No : 1 07:00 AM 2nd Entrance (E of France) 0 0 66th St 1 9 141 0 0 150 0 0 0 66th St 5 58 0 0 From North 214 07:15 AM From East 0 0 0 From South 13 237 From West 0 250 Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App, Torsi Ri ht I Thru I Left Peds a .Tome Ri ht I Thal I Left I Peds I APP. Tow Ri ht I Thru I Left Peds I App. Tome Int. Total 06:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 3 35 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 0 0 20 59 06:15 AM 2 0 0 0 2 4 36 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 67 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 9 50 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 2 31 0 0 33 92 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 84 0 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 4 55 0 0 59 153 Total 3 0 0 0 3 26 205 0 0 231 0 0 0 0 0 8 129 0 0 137 371 07:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 9 141 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 5 58 0 0 63 214 07:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 13 237 0 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 7 77 0 0 84 335 07:30 AM 7 0 0 0 7 18 294 0 0 312 0 0 0 0 0 4 79 0 0 83 402 07:45 AM 6 0 0 0 6 17 337 0 0 354 0 0 0 0 0 5 88 0 0 93 453 Total 15 0 0 0 15 57 1009 0 0 1066 0 0 0 0 0 21 302 0 0 323 1404 08:00 AM 6 0 0 0 6 22 303 0 0 325 0 0 0 0 0 8 98 0 0 106 437 08:15 AM 10 0 0 0 10 20 312 0 0 332 0 0 0 0 0 5 99 0 0 104 446 08:30 AM 11 0 0 0 11 13 230 0 0 243 0 0 0 0 0 5 92 0 0 97 351 08:45 AM 11 0 0 0 11 23 269 0 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 4 97 0 0 101 404 Total 38 0 0 0 38 78 1114 0 0 1192 0 0 0 0 01 22 386 0 0 408 1638 03:00 PM 20 0 0 0 20 10 179 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 0 28 134 0 0 162 371 03:15 PM 26 0 0 0 26 12 210 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 23 128 0 0 151 399 03:30 PM 23 0 0 0 23 7 225 0 0 232 0 0 0 0 0 31 156 0 0 187 442 03:45 PM 17 0 0 0 17 13 228 0 0 241 0 0 0 0 0 25 178 0 0 203 461 Total 86 0 0 0 86 42 842 0 0 884 0 0 0 0 0 107 596 0 0 7031 1673 04:00 PM 28 0 0 0 28 3 241 0 0 244 0 0 0 0 0 29 187 0 0 216 488 04:15 PM 31 0 0 0 31 7 237 0 0 244 0 0 0 0 0 18 194 0 0 212 487 04:30 PM 33 0 0 0 33 7 245 0 0 252 0 0 0 0 0 19 238 0 0 257 542 04:45 PM 26 0 0 0 26 10 297 0 0 307 0 0 0 0 0 25 248 0 0 273 606 Total 118 0 0 0 118 27 1020 0 0 1047 0 0 0 0 0 91 867 0 0 9581 2123 05:00 PM 21 0 0 0 21 6 279 0 0 285 0 0 0 0 0 16 271 0 0 287 593 05:15 PM 11 0 0 0 11 2 316 0 0 318 0 0 0 0 0 22 259 0 0 281 610 05:30 PM 7 0 0 0 7 4 269 0 0 273 0 0 0 0 0 17 237 0 0 254 534 05:45 PM 12 0 0 0 12 3 268 0 0 271 0 0 0 0 0 21 200 0 0 221 504 Total 51 0 0 0 51 15 1132 0 0 1147 0 0 0 0 0 76 967 0 0 1043 2241 Grand Total 1 311 0 0 0 311 1 245 5322 0 0 5567 0 0 0 0 0 325 3247 0 0 3572 9450 Apprch % 100 0 0 0 4.4 95.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 90.9 0 0 To % 3.3 0 0 0 3.3 1 2.6 56.3 0 0 58.9 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 34.4 0 0 37.8 �tG 66th St & 2nd Entrance (E of France) File Name 66th st & N entrance (site 3) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Site Code 00000003 Edina, MN Start Date 6/11 /2013 1686 -45 Page No : 2 f Z f— J 2 C I L m O� 0 a 2nd Entrance (E of France) Out In Tota 06 29 ol 01 0 Right T� eft Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A 1 - Unshifted +, T r Left i ht Peds ol ol 01 0 22 Out In Total W 2nd Entrance (E of France) From North 66th St From East From South 66th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds romi Right Thru Left Peds Ri hl Thrti Left Peds Ri ht 'ThrU Left f Z f— J 2 C I L m O� 0 a 2nd Entrance (E of France) Out In Tota 06 29 ol 01 0 Right T� eft Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A 1 - Unshifted +, T r Left i ht Peds ol ol 01 0 22 Out In Total W J �O —C N W r �CD 0 w rn ID °° m Peds q .romi Int.Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM - 07:30 AM . 7 0 0 0 7 .18 294 0 0 312 .. 0 0. 0 0 0 4. 79 0 0 83 .` 402 07:45 AM 6 0. .: 0 0 6 17 337 0 0 354 0 0 0 0 0 5 88 0 0 93 453 08:00 AM 6 '0 0 0 6 22 303 0 0 325 0 0 0 0 0 8 98 " 0 0 106 437 08:15 AM 10 0 0 -' 0 10 20 312 0 0 332 0 0 0 0 0 5 99 0 0 104 _446 Total volume 29 . 0 0. 0 29 77 1246 0 0 1323 0 0 0 0 0' 22 364 0 0 386 1738 % App. Total 100 01 0 0 5.8 94.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 94.3 0 0 PHF 1 .725 .000 .000 .000 .725 .875 .924 .000 .000 .934 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .688 .919 .000 .000 .910 .959 f Z f— J 2 C I L m O� 0 a 2nd Entrance (E of France) Out In Tota 06 29 ol 01 0 Right T� eft Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A 1 - Unshifted +, T r Left i ht Peds ol ol 01 0 22 Out In Total W J �O —C N W r �CD 0 w rn ID °° m WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 66th St & 2nd Entrance (E of France) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -45 File Name : 66th st & N entrance (site 3) Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 6/11/2013 Page No : 3 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis 2nd Entrance (E of France) 66th St 66th St From North From East From South From West Start Time Rig Thr Left Ped *� Rig Thr Ped Left — Right Thr Left Peds n o.rodi Right Thr Left Peds App. Total Peak Hour Data ht u s ht u s 245 0 u 252 0 0 u 0 0 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 2nd Entrance (E of France) Out I Total 9 9 0 0 0 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM Peak Hour Data 04:30 PM 33 0 0 0 33 7 245 0 0 252 0 0 0 0 0 19 238 0 0 257 542 04:45 PM 26 0 0 0 26 10 297 0 0 307 0 0 0 0 0 25 248 0 0 273 606 05:00 PM 21 0 0 0 21 6 279 0 0 285 0 0 0 0 0 16 271 0 0 287 593 05:15 PM 11 0 0 0 11 2 316 0 0 318 0 0 0 0 0 22 259 0 0 281 610 Total Volume 91 0 0 0 91 25 1137 0 0 1162 0 0 0 0 0 82 1016 0 0 1098 2351 % App. Total 100 0 0 0 2.2 97.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.5 92.5 0 0 PHF .689 .000 .000 .000 .689 .625 .900 .000 .000 .914 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .820 .937 .000 .000 .956 .964 44$ 2nd Entrance (E of France) Out I Total 9 9 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data m North i� °' m in o r —► H �2 w 0 m Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P ID f0 00 L i-E 1 - U s ifted �� o N (n 0 d (1 N O CO 4� T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 01 01 01 0 © 0 82 Out In Total 44$ 66th St & Entrance ( E of France Ave) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm: Edina, MN 1686 -45 r WSB- & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : 66th st &,N entrance (site 4). Site Code :00000004 Start Date : 6/12/2013 Page No :1 07:00 AM Entrance (E of France) 0 .0 0 66th St 5 125 0 0 Entrance 0 0 0 0 I 66th St 0 59 0 0 From North 189 07:15 AM From East .. 0 0 0 From South 4 183 0 From West .187 0 Start Time Ri hr Thni Left Peds A .Ta Ri ht Thru Left .Peds A .TOW Ri ht Thru Left Peds App. Toll Ri ht Thru Left Peds iami tnt.Totat 06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 •0 28 62 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 35 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 .22 0 0 22 58 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 57 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 48 108 :06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 01 1 97 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 58 156 Total. 0 0 0 0 01 5- 223 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 0 0 156 - 384 07:00 AM 0 0 .0 0 0 5 125 0 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 59 189 07:15 AM 0 .. 0 0 0 0 4 183 0 0. .187 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 65 252 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 6 272 0 0 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 65 343 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 339 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 107 456 Total 0 0 0 0 0 25 919 0 0 944 0 0 0 0 0 0 296 0 0 296 1240 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 302 0 0 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 103 412 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 282 0 0 285 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 0 99 384 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 8 281 0 0 289 0 0 0 0 0 0 .105 0 0 105 394 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 11 263 0 0 274 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 107 381 Total 0 0 0 0 0 29 1128 0 0 1157 0 0 0 0 0 0 414 0 0 4141 1571 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 226 0 0 233 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 0 0 162 395 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 223 0 0 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 0 0 254 485 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 252 0 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 171 432 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 275 0 0 279 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 0 0 177 456 Total 0 0 0 0 0 28 976 0 0 1004 0 0 0 0 0 0 764 0 0 764 1768 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 262 0 0 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 0 209 473 04:15 PM 0 0 .0 0 0 2 265 0 0 267 0 0 0 .0 0 0 239 0 0 239 506 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 270 0 0 271 0 0 0 0 0 0 266 0 0 266 537 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 266 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 0 0 234 560 Total 0 0 0 0 0 5 1063 0 0 1068 0 0 0 0 0 0 948 0 0 948 2016 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 0 0 291 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 0 0 260 551 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 292 0 0 293 0 0 0 0 0 0 261. 0 0 261 554 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 249 0 0 249 0 0 0 0 0 0 271 0 0 271 520 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 219 0 0 220 0 0 0 0 0 0. 210 0. 0 210 430 Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1051 0 0 1053 0 0 0 0 0 0 1002 0 0 1002 2055 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 94 5360 0 0 5454 0 0 0 0 0 0 3580 0 0 3580 9034 Apprch % I 0 0 0 0 I 1.7 98.3 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 100 0 0 T % otal 0 0 0 0 0 1 59.3 0 0 60.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.6 0 0 39.6 Age WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 66th St & Entrance ( E of France Ave) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -45 File Name : 66th st & N entrance (site 4) Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 6/12/2013 Page No :2 Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Entrance (E of France) From North 66th St I From East Entrance From South 66th St From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Tom I Right I Thru I Left I Peds Alp. Total Right I Thru Left I Peds L App. Total I Right I Thru I Left Peds Toth Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 339 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 107 456 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 302 0 0 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 103 412 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 282 0 0 285 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 0 99 384 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 8 281 0 0 289 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 105 394 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 28 1204 0 0 1232 0 0 0 0 0 0 414 0 0 414 1646 % Aoo. Total 0 0 . 0 0 2.3 97.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 Entrance (E of France) =2-81L Right T1 Left Peds Peak Hour Data 75 0 �O CO North _ 2 � N rn c I-� -2 p m o Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 A m CD N � y 1 - Unshi ed rx o )0 d a a Ho *-, T r Left Thru Riaht Peds 0 0 01 0 0 0 F--O� Out In Total 4qa 66th St & Entrance ( E of France Ave) 6 -9 am and 3 -6 pm Edina, MN 1686 -45 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : 66th st & N entrance (site 4) Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 6/12/2013 Page No :3 A'( Entrance (E of France) 66th St Entrance 66th St From North From East From South From West StartTlme .Rig Thr Left Ped Rig Thr Left Ped Right Thr Left �Peds. App.Tami Right Thr Left Peds App.TOhl ht u t ht u rn � � U 1 - Unshifted �x ° A'( Entrance (E of France) Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 ht T� Left Peds Inl. Total . Peak Hour Data 75 H� MO t North 20 rn Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P � 1 - Unshifted �x ° Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM -Peak 1 of 1 U A m �O T r Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM Le h Right Peds 0 0 0 0 O 0 Oo 04:30 PM 0- 0 0 0 0 1 270 0 0 271 0 0 0 0 0 0 .266 0 0 266 537 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 266 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 0 0 234: 500 05:06 PM 0 0. 0 0 0 0 291 0. 0 291 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 0 0 260 551 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 292 0 0 293 0 0 0 0 0 0 261 0 0 261 554 Total Volume 0. 0 0 0 0 2 1119 0 0. 1121 0 0 0 0 0 0 1021 0 0. 1021 2142 App. Total 0 0 0 0 0.2 99.8 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .958 .000 .000 :956 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .960 .000 :000 .960 .967 A'( Entrance (E of France) Out In Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 ht T� Left Peds Peak Hour Data 75 H� MO t North 20 rn Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P � 1 - Unshifted �x ° Q� ° N U A m �O T r Le h Right Peds 0 0 0 0 O 0 Oo Out In Total Pntmnrp A'( SkamR Sun m �ry 8=01 E,,UN qM Peak Ha CertGllm Measiaea a /Eff Gk ss Aix K\ 01686 450\TraHc\SynchmTl is8ng12013 MOEs TAB: SAM MOEs1 822/2013 �m000�oo � . �oee�© ®ems © ©mm�tem�mnnn�n o___e ®nn� m ®ee�� ®e��ee��m ® ®mnnnm•n m��eee___ �o ©m�ee�e�enn ®mm�nnenn�e �e��me___ mnnnn ©n ®eon ©�ntmnmm�ne�n ®ne______ emmn�nene ® ®e ®ee�e�een ®e e___ne___ m ©n ©see ©nennnemmmm�ne ®e � ©n______ eneeenemen ® ®emmn© ®nee ®e m���am��� mennmmenme ©neemm ®mnnn�e � ©tee ®e��� m ©ammo © ©mm ® ©ntntmmm ®nnnn.n ���� ©nnen ennnennnmm�nnt ®men ®eee ®e � ©n������ oommee�meo�n000�� ®noo�o ee ®ems ©��� mo © © ®oommneo ©omen ®nnn�o mmomoo��� e ®epee ©e ®eeeaem� ® ®nee�e m ®neem ®ems .. one © ©neemn ©e ®eenm ®nnnn.e e����n��� mnneenneennnam mnmm�nn�e m�����e ®� mnnnnneneneeee,mnmmnenn . e m��� ©n... mnnnnnnnnnnnnemnnnennn. a m�������� Aix K\ 01686 450\TraHc\SynchmTl is8ng12013 MOEs TAB: SAM MOEs1 822/2013 • r SknTraHic Str "ion Sw-ry - EaL t PM Peak How Condl am - - Meazwes of EnetiWaneza ' 413 K \01686.4501Tm fic%SynchrolExisbng12013 MOEs TAB: FPM MOEs] 8222013 �. 1e�m,a�os�® enmmeemmna�ee�emnmmme�e� mmnnmmeemm�nmt��meaemm�e �A��v��_� la ommom ®mom ®mm ®mm���nmm�® ®m�am�mr� mmommoom ©e ®nmt�m�� ®ano ®a mom ®oo��� me ®mmemee ® ®m����� ®nee�e me�em� ®ems �mnneeenemnna��nmamee�e m����mv��� enm ©mnm ©mn ®e ®�'enm ®eee�e ee��a ©woe m0emmneeene ® ®ml�m0 ®mee ®m. ���mt�� ®ems mnnnen�m�nem�e,mm ®mama ®m. m ®��ee�®� !�nnnenemnnnnem mmm�eee�e�� m�����mt�� mnnnnaennnnne�mnnmmee�e m�������� �meenememe�e�mmm ®eeee ®e m�������� 413 K \01686.4501Tm fic%SynchrolExisbng12013 MOEs TAB: FPM MOEs] 8222013 SknTnNlc sm,VaHm summary 8=013 2015 No Bdid AM Peak Neur Com560re Measwe5 of ENeclkrera:ss i444 IC1016654501TrafficlSynchro12015 NB12015 NB MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs) 6/27/2013 000000�m�m e moeeeeeoeeeeo�moeeeee�e ��________ memo ®eeeee ©eee ©e�eeeo ®e m____e___ B_ , , eseseeeeeseeeeeeeee�e�e e________ ®eeeeeeeeseeee�eeeeee�e �________ mom ®moo ®m ©e�mmo��m000�o oomo ® ®___ mo ©o ® ©oom�� ©amm ®� ®000�o 'mmmmemmmm ® ®e © ®�mm��� nee ®e m ©eemm ®em .. Imme�oee meeennenenenemmnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm one ©�n�m�nm © ®een� ®eee�e� emmmmmmmm mneeenneeneeammnn�eee�e mmmmmm ® ©m Imenennm�mnm��mmn��eee�e mmmme ©mmm menennenennnemmnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm °®'imnnn°eee°e��m�������� mennnnneennee 'mmmmmmmmm mnnnenenenen� men ®neee ®e i444 IC1016654501TrafficlSynchro12015 NB12015 NB MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs) 6/27/2013 shnTrofllc s4ndMIm su,mvry 2015 No Bu" PMP,.x Ho Cor4Uom Effedivemss Mea- 'I Alf- K: \01686- 4501Tmffid5yndiroUO15 NB12015 NB MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] - 822@013 Oil �� mmm ©mmmm mnnnnnnnnn�ne�mnnneee� mmmmwmmmm ��� ®ern ®mnen ©�mnnmene�e �m '�eme ®mmmmms �� ® ®ennn� ® ©© ®gym ®� ©ee0 ®e ©mmmm '® nee ® ®mmm�e ® ®��� ®nnen�0��:�ammae ®sm '�nnmenem ® ®e ©ern ®eneee�e �smeemn ®e !mnem�ee�� ®nom ®�,�� ®none ®e mmm ®semmm '� ®nnnn ©�� ®en ©� mnnenen�e��'� ® ®mmmmmm laneennnnnn�neBannesee�e �m ®mm ®mmm !mnm ©tee © ©en�e ®��n� ®sen�� mmmm ®mmm ��nne ®nnn ®ee ® ®e��n ®new ®� �mesmm®mm mnnennnnnnen��mnnnaenn.e '� ®mmmmmmm �m ®mmm ®enenm ©m��mm��n0n�o �m ®mm ®mmm �nnnnnnnnnene ®mnnnnee�e mmmsmmmmm; enn ©mnme ©ne ®e ®mnn ®ee��e��emmmoemom mnnmm�nennnn ®mmnnnanen•a mmmomm ®em ',mnnnnnnnenene ®mnnneee�e mmmm ©eemm . '� mnnnnnnnnnnneemnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm ens ®ene ©ennneeennn0ee�e ammmmmmmm mnnnnennnnneem,,mnn0e0e�� mmmmm_mmo mnennmm�emm�eemnnneee�e mmmmmmmmm Alf- K: \01686- 4501Tmffid5yndiroUO15 NB12015 NB MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] - 822@013 SknTraBle SirnaaBon Surnmary 8127/1013 7070 No Bo0d AM Peak kfo a asur Con&io- Mees of EBeGlveness Alf K101686A501Traffic%Synchro12030 NB12030 NB MOEs TAB: ]AM MOEs] 8222013 ®ommmmommm�oo ®m ®��oon�o mommmo___ ee�e ©eeee ©e ©e ®m� ®�eee�e ��e�eee�e ®eeee ®� ®�ese�e meeoeoeeeeeee�meeeeee�o m________ . oeeeseeeeeeee�e�eeeee�e.: '�________ �eseeoeseeeee���e�see�e ��ee______ �eeeseeeeseee��seesee�e ��________ mmnmmmoommonamm ®�onno�o 'm ©mt ®mm��� mememmmee © ©n ©mm��mneemse mmmmemm. ©� mnnnnnnneeenemtmenneeem ■ e m�������� 'mnneenneene © ®�mnn ©eee�e 'm�����mte� 'mennnnemeeememmemmeeem . e m��� ©e��� I 'mnnnennneennee mnnneee�e�1 m�������� 'enmemn ® ©en ®me�oemmeee�e e���� ©��� mnnnennnennneemnnneee�e m�������� �mennnneneneneelmn ®neee ®e m�������� Alf K101686A501Traffic%Synchro12030 NB12030 NB MOEs TAB: ]AM MOEs] 8222013 SmTraRc Shnola6on Summary ar2]2a13 ]M Ns B PM Pea4 Neor Conchtf— . Neasurn or EQedk —ss K:% 01686 -450 %TrafflckSynchroX2030 NB12030 NB MOEs TAB: [PM MOEsj 822/2013 ARE m ®e�oee�e� ©eemm���ne��e � ®tee ®m ©ems m��eeneneneeem ,mn��eee�e��'m��o����� m�nm�neeeenee�mne ®eee ®e m�����e ®� m�eeneoemee���m� ®eee� ®e m��a�m��� I 'mnenennnnnnnee mnneeee�0�� ��������� ene ®mee ©oe�e��oe��eee�e e����e��� mneeeennennneemnnneee�e ��������� K:% 01686 -450 %TrafflckSynchroX2030 NB12030 NB MOEs TAB: [PM MOEsj 822/2013 suaTramo SWuUUm summary 9122120" 2919 Build AM Peak Nma CorM6lom Was— of Effadhrcraesa hil K: \01666- 4501Traffic%Synchro12015 Buildl2015 Build MOEs TAB: )AM MOFs) 627/2013 o ®mmene ® © ®� ©e�ene�me Amon emmmmmmmm mee ©me ®em ® ®ne�mn ®_999_9 mmmmmmmmm Min M®M______ mnnnnnnnnnnneemnnneeeme m________ mne ®oeemmn ®e ®mmnm ®999_9 mmmmaemmm mmmmmnnme ®m ©e ©mmmmnnnme memee ©mmm mmm ©memn ®nme ®�ommmmmnme emmmmmmmm m©emm©®mm®©eM mmmmmmmm _mmm ®e ®em �mmeeemenn ©� ®nt�m ®mmeseme mmmme ®mmm 'memee ©mnesenee,m ®meseeme . me ®mmmmmm menennesennneeoneeeseme emmmmmmmm mnmm ®emmmne ©e�'meemeseme mmmmmmmmm m ©nemeene ®e ®© 'mnn ®ese ®e mmmmmmmmm mnnennennneseemneneseme emmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmme© ©mom ®mnnnmm mmmmmmmmm mm ©mm000 ®e ©e ®mm ® ®nnnomo� _mom ©ommm mmemeeoen ®ee ©m'm�� ®nneme mememmmmm mnnnneennnenemmneneeeme mmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmn ®n�mmnmmnnnmm emmmm ©mmm mnnemnneennne ®',mnnmeeeme mmmmmm© ©m Mmnmmmmmmnmmmmmn® ®999_9 mmmmeemmm mmmnemmemn ©e ©e'm�m ®nneme mm000 ®mmm ooemenemem ©neo m��mnneme�� mmmmmmm ©m m ®mnmmmmemm� ®em n ®nee ®e mmmmm"Mmm meeneeeme ©nne�me� ®neeme mmmmmmmmm hil K: \01666- 4501Traffic%Synchro12015 Buildl2015 Build MOEs TAB: )AM MOFs) 627/2013 sknTraHlc aknMeHOn Sianmary S=M" MIS Buld PM Peak Hour Condi lom Measures of Effective- 0 K:X01686-450\TraMc1SynchroX20l5 BuilcR2015 Build MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] 812 212 01 3 0000m000mu000© om ®mom 000000m HOW mm =mmmm= o mooeeooeoeeeemmeeeeee�e m________� e o . �m________ �seeeeeeeeeee�mese�ee�e : omm ®o ®mm���o ® ®o�� ®oeo�o momoom___ moomoomo ® ® ® © ®mm�m�000�o mom ®oo___ . meeeeeeeeeeeee�eeeeee�e m________ ! mn®® eneemnm ®�mmn��eee�e��lm���am��� 'mnn��nn��nn © ©mmne ®eee ®e m�����mfmt� �mnnnen�e�nme�eme��eee�e m���a ®��� 'mm� ©mm�e�e ©��m'm��� nee ®e �memte �mmtmmmtm ®mte ®® e� ®eme ®mmme ® ®m m ®��nee�e� eem ®mt�mtmt� mew ®�e�em ®e ©e ®m��mnen�e mmtme����� me�� ®eem ® ©© ®ammo ® ®nne ®e_ ®mm 0 K:X01686-450\TraMc1SynchroX20l5 BuilcR2015 Build MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] 812 212 01 3 synTrame smruraum saamry 912=0" 20]1 BJid AM Pest Now Ca ditlom Was —of Eff ci... Moo K :101686450\TrelfidSynchro12030 Build\2030 Build MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs] 822/2013 Of ., m0000000e0000�m00��08�0 m�������� Moo K :101686450\TrelfidSynchro12030 Build\2030 Build MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs] 822/2013 SknTraRc SmW,tlon Summry SIt2R010 2030 Bldld PM Peak Hm CondOlom Mea — of EfleGh2mss may, _ ....... . ..... . •... 'm�0nne�nnneeemme�neee�e m________ mnn��nnm ®nee�mmnn�eee�e m_____e�_ !mnnenn�m�ee�m�©e��eee�� �___0m■___ Aco ( K\01686-4501TmMcASynchr02030 BuilcK2030 Build MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] 8rM2013 sknTraffle Sk ulalon suoenary B12=D a 2015 ea did AM Pk Haw Candid re -N6(h M6lgaflan Measwes of EHMi —ss .......,.,. -tea_ ......... mo�o���o�m ®mom Ed- mnnnnnnnnnnnemmnnneee�e 'm�������� m�e�enemenee ®�mn ® ®eee�e Im����e��� ' - - memne ®en ® ©ee ©gym ®�eeee�e .. �e ®������ aennesennenneeeenneee�e e�w����� m ©ee�enenme� ®�m�e�eee�e �ee������ 'mennesenneene� ®enesee�e�� - ��������� oo ®��m� ®e�meomo�� ®noo�o oo ®omo��� mm ©ommom ®� © © ®m'm��onoo�o 'mmommo��� m�emememm ®ne ©mm� ® ®nee�e me�eem��� _ mnn�neennennemmneeeee�e m�������� ��mnnmeeem ®enee ®mnn�eee�e� m����� ©ems mnennee�mne��eme ® ®eee�e m��we ©��� !me��oe ®�me� ©e�m��mnne�e �eemm•�a ®e oe�meme ®ems ® ©me ®�mnnee��'em ® ®mm�e� meoeoeoe ®mem�eme�mnee�e me��e���� 419 ) KA 01666- 4501TrafOcASynchro12015 BuiId12015 Build MOEs - MiOgated TAB; SAM MOEs] 822/2017 SknTmmc Sandatim Summary ammo' 2015 Build PM Peak Hour tmldalef6• N p{Ylgallan w res o /EBediver S A (0 3 K:Wl68&450XTraKcISynchroX20l5 Build12015 Build MOEs • Mi0gated TAB: [PM MOEs) 822/2013 mmto��e�e�o ®mm ® ®m ®aflem © ®t ®tmm ®��tete ® ®® t�tatatat ®ta___ . - '�me ©© ®same ® ®ts�m�e�te0tett�tts ®___ts ®___ e ®m ®�memmtee ©t ®tteemtememm ®e ®___eat___ ® ecsmtetemtetenaatmi��m�a0 ®tt�etet t�tata______ �temmmtemm ®se ®tste'ammmtemtett�t� �___t ®ta___ . ' ��mtem�te ®meetetstm�mmmmtetet�tt� Meta______ eem tam© ®tee ®atetstme ®mtemeeta�tts e___t ®ta___ �mtemtemteteteemene�mtetemmtetet�ts m________ �mte® os ®te�te�te ®tee�mtemmteestet�ts m________ �m ®temm ® ®mte ®a ®tmt�m ® ® ®semtt�ttm �tatete ®ta___ ©temm ®te�mm® ©tat® teas ®mteteteto�sttm�1�___tata_ty_ ®maser ®mm ®sem ®emmmmetetet�M t� ® ® ®tatatattsts �® tam�etete ®m ® ©mt ®tm�m ®emmtett�tts �___tets___ . ' m ®aeaseaamase ®a0tmte� ®mteesat�t� �t ®t ®ta_____ ' eteteatetemtetemetetsteetetete0tetet�ttm e________ �aseas ®aseaseasaas�ammnm ®a�atemat�as m___a�___ mmtetem ®etemme0tste� ®te ®asasasat�as �t ®ts______ I �tetatemtetemmteemetemmteteetetet�t� a________ 'ommme ®�ootemte� ®'m�� ®nnnamas mta ®same°___ moomm ®motor ® ® ®t ®�m� ®m ®no ®o� mm ®moo___ �m ®mmtemmmte ®em�m ® ® ®ntate�e mM ®e�eme�_ mteteteteteteteteteeteemmtetetetetete m________ stem ®mesmte ®te ®te ®�emm ®teet eon �____ta___ men® ®ate® ®tee © ©mmnte ®teeter ®ts m_____M0_ mtetetetetemmetetmtetet ®,mtetemetetet�M �___t ©ts___ mmaoetm® meteteem ® ®m��mtetete�e����mem�Mee me�temm�te� mate® ®mom ®�meeMe mm�eee___ etemm ®eete ©teem, ©temm�mmtetett�ts motet ®t ®,stet ®tats A (0 3 K:Wl68&450XTraKcISynchroX20l5 Build12015 Build MOEs • Mi0gated TAB: [PM MOEs) 822/2013 ShnTnHlc ahnuletlon S—ary BM=17 1070 Build AM Penh Hem tonddlons - Wdh MAlgadon Measures of Egedk —s Alot K:101686.450\TrafBdSynchro\2030 Buildk2030 Build MOEs - Mitigation TAB: [AM MOEsj 82212013 - ©one ©Home ® © ® ® ®o�n ®nne�n en ©nn�n ®® m ©me ®eee ©eee ©m���nnn�n mnn�m ®___ me © ®ee ©seneoee�,m��nnee�e m���n ©��� �mnne� ®sen�ennt ®m�neinee�e � ® ®������ e® enm ©emm�nne ®onnneee ®e��e��� ®���� mnnnnnnnnnnnn ©,mnnnnn HOW m�������� mnm�enm�enenem;,mn ® ®ennne m����n��� '��nne ®m ®e ©eee ©,m ®nneee ®e��;�nneen��� ©em ©me® ©urn ©nem,enn ®esene e���n���� mnne ®eee ®� © © ®�m� ®neee�e '�����nnnnn m�mnmm�nene © ©m!,m�nnese�e ����n���� . mn�nmeen� ®ennt�,mnneseene !� ©nn����� ennnnnennnnnn�mnnnnee�e ,��������� memnmemne®n�nnt�mn ®enee�e ��������� m ©Hen ©nnnenne�,mne�see�e �en������ mnennnennnnnn�;mnenneen•e ��������� meenmm�m� ®nommm���nnnn.n mone����� mmommmoom000 ®�Imm ®�nno ®n mn�m ©m��� mn�meennnee © ®�m�� ®nne�n m ® ®nnnn ®� .. 'mnnnnnnnnnnnnntmnnnnee�e !m�������� mn�menmmmn�nnt�mnnnnne�e m�������� mnnennn © ©nnnntm;mnnnneene� m�����nn�'i 'mnnnnn�nnn�nmemnnneeene ����nn��� 'm ©emenem ®neeeem�� ®nne�n mnne ®m�ee 'ooem ®enm © ® ©n ©em ®� ©nee ®n ens ®n�nn� mm ®e�m ©eee ® ® ®mm���nnnnn me�nnn��� mm ©eemee ® ®nne�m�� ®nne�n urn ®nn�emn Alot K:101686.450\TrafBdSynchro\2030 Buildk2030 Build MOEs - Mitigation TAB: [AM MOEsj 82212013 shnTnHk st mdadon sunmary 9/atft013 Baselhq Mnsves of EHedHercss A(VT KA01686A501Tmffic\Synchro12030 BuildU030 Build MOEs - Mitigation TAB: [PM MOEs[ 8/22/2013 2: 66th SOW SOURW. Ed- o . ' eeese�eeeeese�e �meeeeeeeoeeeeemeooeee�e ©�esee�e�oe___e ©___ �________ ��ee��ee��ee�e��ee ®eee�e�o�e ©eee___ now �... �nneneeneeseemeseeese�e��e�������� mememememe� ©���e ®ease ®e �����e��� mmeemme ®eee ® ®��memeee�e � ®e������ meeseneeeeesemt �eenn0e�e�� ��������� omeo�momm © ©n�oo���nnn�o oo ®emm��� m0000m ©om ®gym ®mm���onn�o momma ©�o�, meoemeeneee ©eelmmm ®nee�e me ®e�eee� . 'mnnnnneeneneee,mnnneee�e�� m�������� enmmmne ©meee��en® ®eee ®e e�������� mnnmmnn ® ®ee © ®�Imnnmeee�� m�����e ®� mnenene�mee��eme��ese�e m��� ®m��� mm�mm ® ®mme ® ®mt�m� ®mnne�e mmm� ®ems ®® ememem ©em ®�emt�e ®emnne ®e m ® ® ®�ee�� �meme�mmm�mee ©ems ©�eee�e m�mmm���� !memeoemmmeenemtm���nne�e Ime�mm��mm A(VT KA01686A501Tmffic\Synchro12030 BuildU030 Build MOEs - Mitigation TAB: [PM MOEs[ 8/22/2013 01 1 CITY OF MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com ;-0 }' m 'p Date: August 22, 2013 To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne D. Houle — City Engineer Re: Review of Planning Submittal for Southdale Medical Campus 3800 66th St W Engineering has reviewed the revised plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. • Hennepin County supports the consolidation of the driveways along 66th St W, see attached email. Sheet C 102 Demolition Plan: o Any pedestrian or roadway light removal should be coordinated with Edina Public Works for removal and storage of light fixture. Sheet C200 Overall Site Plan: • Show proposed intersection improvements "France Ave Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project" at 66th St and France Ave; contact WSB & Associates for layout. • Provide detail on driveway crossings over the brick paver sidewalks. Use detail from 1996/1997 66th St project. This should include the new crossing and the snow chute crossing. Sheet C201 Site Plan: o Provide detail on driveway crossings over the brick paver sidewalks. Use detail from 1996/1997 66th St project. This should include the new crossing and the snow chute crossing. o Will require "curb cut" permit for apron to the snow chute. Sheet C301 Grading, Drainage, Paving, & Erosion Control Plan: o Show the pedestrian light being reinstalled east of driveway on 66th St. Sheet L701 Site Plan: o Change bike rack detail BR -0.Ixo either an A or B style racks, see below. AX Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 Bike Walk Twin Cities Bike Parking Program Specs May 2011 StvleABike Rack: t With proper installation, Style A bike tacos are capable of puking up to ~ two bikes and allowing users to lock their frame and wheels with a u -style r�) j bike lack- The outside diameter of the rack is 24" and 35" bigh. 3S" liaterials 1 The mcka are gahm dzed steel tubing (1.4" outside diameter, scbed. 40 steel pipe). JI I Mauntfng system The racks have two mounting feet per unit Each foot is .25" thick steel plate. 2.5" wide by 6" long. The full circumference of the rack body is 24" y, welded to the feet plates. The fat are 221" apart, center line �n measm�s. Stile B Bike Rack: ° Villproper mctctlat i Snie B bike racks are capable of parking up to two bikes and allowing i s to lock dim frame and wheels with a u style S.5 bike lock. The racks are 35" for foot mounted models and 40" high for ma f gmrmd mount models (allowing 5" to be below grade)- The bike rack is 165" wide at the middle a the ring. 3faterials 35" 1. "� " the racks are galtmuized steel tubing ( post - 2.375" diameter, schedule 40 steel pipe. ring -1.5" outside diameter, I l gauge steel tube). Afounting The racks have a 6"x6" by .25" thick foot plate. Each plate shall hate 2375 ° four slob. The fill circumference of the rack body is welded to the flet plate& For in -ground mounting there will be no mounting feet but the rack body is 5" longer. Transit for livable Communities tvww.flc" mnesota.org Sheet A20 I to A205 Parking Level Plans: s "A °+ �:, « n + „p,�� .� v ILL �l • Provide additional detail on snow chute, such as: Does it include a snow melter? Is the snow hauled away? If it is hauled away, what will be the time of day for removal? What traffic control will they provide, etc. • Floor drains for the top two levels need to drain to the storm sewer system in order to capture runoff during large events. • Can the outer drive isles be change to angled parking, since these drive isles are one -ways? If not add additional pavement markings to indicate the direction of travel. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. G: \PW \ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \F Streets \6525 6545 France Avenue )Southdale Medical Building) \2013 Expansion \20130822 WH -Edina Review 3800 66th St W.doc A tin `1 Engineering Department ° 7450 Metro Blvd ° Edina, MN 55439 Cary Teague From: Wayne Houle Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:19 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: FW: Southdale Medical Office Building Attachments: pic26134 jpg; 20130822 WH -Edina Review 3800 66th St W.doc Can you include this email with my memo? Thanks Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering 952 - 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 WHoule @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN -gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Robert.Byers @co.hennepin.mn.us [ma ilto : Robert. Byers@co. hen nepin.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 1:28 PM To: Reid Schulz; Bob Schunicht, PE Cc: Carla.Stueve @co.hennepin.mn.us; Steve.Groen @co.hennepin.mn.us; Wayne Houle Subject: Southdale Medical Office Building Reid: At out Plat Review Committee meeting yesterday we discussed your latest proposed access revision which would consolidate the driveways to the mid -block location. Our group supports this concept, and views it as an improvement over the current situation. Please go ahead and work with Steve Groen on our staff regarding the driveway permit. If you are familiar with our ePermitting system, you can also start an application at: https: / /roadPermits.co.hennepin.mn.us :.. Bob Byers, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Hennepin County Public Works - Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 -5421 (612) 596 -0354 robert.byers(@co.hennepin.mn.us From: Carla J Stueve /PW /Hennepin To: Robert H. Byers /PW /Hennepin @Hennepin, Date: 08/14/2013 01:08 PM Subject:Re: Southdale. Medical Office Building Bob, Have you responded to. Reid that all looks good, or would you like me to reply? His email referenced ROW impacts, we did not discuss that.our.plat meeting. It.isn't obvious to me that there are any ROW impacts to France Ave.. Thanks) Carla Carla Stueve, P.E.] Transportation Engineer Hennepin County Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 Office 612.596.0356 'Cell 612.868.6677 Email carla.stueve @co.hennepin.mn.us From: Robert H. Byers /PW /Hennepin To: Reid Schulz <rschulz @landform.net> 'c: Carla J Stueve /PW /Hennepin @Hennepin date: 08/06/2013.06:52 AM Subject:Re: Southdale Medical Office Building Thanks Reid. We've got a review committee that meets on Tuesday mornings- I'll put this on the agenda and get you any comments we have after we discuss. I ii. Bob Byers, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Hennepin County Public Works - Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 -5421 (612) 596 -0354 robert.byers@co.hennepin.mn.us rrom: Reid Schulz <rschulz @landform.net> To: "Bob Byers ( robert.bvers @co.hennepin.mn.us)" <robert .beers @co.hennepin.mn.us >, Date: 08/02/2013 02:45 PM �Q I Z / [0O Subject:Southdale Medical Office Building Bob, I was given your name by Bob Schunicht in our office. We've submitted to the city of Edina a site plan applicatiorrfor review of the Southdale Medical Office Building expansion on the corner of 66th st. and France Ave. I wanted to touch base with you and submit those same drawings to the county for their review and approval. it's my understanding you have a basic scope of this project and what impacts to the ROW our plan includes. Please take a look and don't hesitate to call if you have any questions. Reid Schulz LANDFORM, Designer Direct: 612 -638 -0245 (Embedded image moved to file: pic26134.jpg)landform.net NOTICE: All drawings, specifications, instruments of service, and other documents, data, or information of any kind, including all electronic files and data ( "Documents ") attached to or "linked" from this E -mail are protected by copyright pursuant to U.S. and international copyright laws. Your use of the Documents is controlled and restricted by the terms of use. By downloading the attached files or by accessing the links contained in this E -mail message, you are agreeing to the .terms of use. COPYRIGHT © 1994 -2012 LANDFORM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NOTICE: indicated professional registrations are for the state in which the office is located; to obtain information about other state licenses, please contact Human Resources at 612 - 252 -9070. Landform ®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish° are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. [attachment "2313 -07 -26 - Site Plan App Civil Documents.pdf" deleted by Robert H. Byers /PW /Hennepin]Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney - client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message of this message, please immediately notify from your computer system. AI16 'v Le ,. ' O o q 8Rr To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. A. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 17, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -79 & Resolution No. 2013 -80 Awarding Sale of G.O. Bonds Series 2013A & 2013B Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2013 -79 Authorizing Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of $8,535,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A and Resolution 2013- 80 Authorizing Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of $1,125,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B. Information / Background: Attached are the resolutions awarding the sale of bonds as drafted by the City's bond counsel, Dorsey & Whitney. The $8,535,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A has two purposes. The first purpose to effect a current refunding of the HRH's Taxable Public Project revenue bonds, Series 2009B (Build America Bonds). The second purpose is the funding of approximately $2,630,000 in principal to the permanent improvement revolving(PIR) fund to finance the City's street reconstruction projects constructed in 2013 and to be assessed in 2014. The 2009B Bonds were originally issued through the HRA and as such the HRA needs to adopt a resolution to redeem the 2009B Bonds as a separate action within the HRA agenda. The $1,125,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 20138 is to finance the portion of the Braemar Golf Dome improvements project net of insurance payments. The bids will be received and tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, September 17. The bids and Ehlers & Associates analysis will be presented to the City Council at the September 17 Council meeting. Attachments: Resolution 2013 -79 Resolution 2013 -80 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50Th St • Edina, MN 55424 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $8,535,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013A Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on September 17, 2013 at 7.00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): Pages 1 through 23 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-79 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $8,535,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all:resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. 2013. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of September, Debra Mangen, City Clerk It was reported that ( ) proposals. had been received prior to 11:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $8,535,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential' purchasers of the Bonds.; The,proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms.of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid-for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] Councilmember resolution and moved its adoption: then introduced the following RESOLUTION NO. 2013-79 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $8,535,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013A. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota ,(the. "City "); as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2005 -70, adopted on August 1 "6, 2005, the City created a revolving fund as contemplated by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.09.1, Subdivision 7a, designated as the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund, and established certain accounts within such Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. On June 18, 2013, this Council held a public hearing on the questions of approving the adoption of amendments to the City's Capital Improvement Plan (the "Plan") and issuing general obligation capital improvement plan bonds in the maximum principal amount of $6,000,000 for the purpose of purchasing the portion of the City's public works facility currently leased by the City from the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority "), which was originally financed with proceeds of the Authority's $6,125,000 Taxable Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009B (City of Edina- Annual-Appropriation Lease Obligations), dated, as . originally issued, as of November 24, 2009 (the "Series 2009B Bonds '). No petition requesting a vote on the question of issuing general obligation capital improvement bonds as provided in the Plan has been filed within 30 days following said public hearing, and the Council fmds that the general obligation capital improvement bonds may be issued without an election pursuant to' Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521, subdivision 2. This Council hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the City to issue its $8,535,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A (the "Bonds ") for the purpose of (i) financing from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the cost of the construction of various local street improvement projects undertaken by the City pursuant to Minnesota.Statutes, Chapter 429 (together, the "Improvements'.'); and (ii) to. acquire from the Authority the portion of the public works facility currently leased by the City from the Authority and to currently refund the Series 2009B Bonds maturing in the years 2014 through 2030 in the aggregate principal amount of $5,735,000 (the "Refunded Bonds "). The Refunded Bonds will be redeemed on November 1, 2013 (the "Redemption Date "). This Council hereby determines to issue and sell the Bonds to defray the expense incurred and'estimated to be incurred by the City in-making the Improvements and to refund the Refunded Bonds, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65. The portion of the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements are referred to as the "Improvement Bonds" and are issued pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Chapter 475, and the portion of the Bonds issued to refund the Refunded Bonds are referred to as the "Refunding Bonds" and are issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 and Chapter 475. The allocation of the Bonds for this purpose is set forth in Section 2.01 hereof. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, (� proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of , of , , and associates (the "Purchaser "), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ - , the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.04. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 1.05. Maturities. This Council finds and determines that the maturities of the Improvement Bonds, as set forth in Section 3.01 hereof, are warranted by the anticipated collection of the assessments to be levied for the cost of the Improvements. Section 2. Bond Terms; Registration; Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; PUMent. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A, shall be originally dated as of October 10, 2013, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest, computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30 -day months, from October 10, 2013 until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: -2- Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2014 $305,000 2023 $515,000 2015 305,000 2024 530,000 2016 455,000 2025 545,000 2017 465,000 2026 555,000 2018 . 470,000 2027 580,000 2019 475,000 2028 600,000 2020 480,000 2029 620,000 2021 490,000 2030 645,000 2022 500,000 2030 215,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Improvement Bonds: Year Amount 2016 $150,000 2017 155,000 2018 155,000 2019 160,000 2020 160,000 2021 165,000 2022 165,000 2023 170,000 2024 175,000 2025 180,000 2026 185,000 2027 190,000 2028 200,000 2029 205,000 2030 215,000 1911 The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Refunding Bonds: Year Amount 2014 $270,000 2015 275,000 2016 280,000 2017 285,000 2018 290,000 2019 300,000 2020 310,000 2021 315,000 2022 330,000 2023 340,000 2024 350,000 2025 365,000 2026 375,000 2027 390,000 2028 405,000 2029 420,000 2030 435,000 2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2014, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Re ister. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer -4- after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal, amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e). Improper or Unauthorized Transfer.' When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the. refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment; deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and.all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the ' owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar;for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. F (h)' Mutilated Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the `"reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. -5- (i) AuthenticatingAgent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. 0) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Paying_ Age nt. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 2014 through 2022 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 2023 through 2030 shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 2022 and on any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing on February 1, 20_ are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: Bonds Maturing on February Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amountl Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption thereof to be published as required by law and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds IM to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or,portions thereof so, to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.06. Execution Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be'printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate . of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive .evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. form: 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the following -7- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2013A Ita Interest Rate REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: Maturity Date of Date Original Issue CUSIP February 1, 20_ October 10, 2013 CEDE & CO. THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2014 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $8,535,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to serial number, maturity date, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on September 17, 2013 (the "Resolution "), to maintain the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund of the City, a permanent fund established for the financing and refinancing of local improvements for which special assessments may be levied against property specifically benefited thereby, and to finance -8- certain projects as described in the City's Capital Improvement Plan and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 and Chapters 429 and 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered Bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds of this issue maturing in 2022 and earlier years are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in 2023 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds maturing on the same date, on February 1, 2022 and any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of,redemption. . [Bonds maturing in the year 20_ shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium.] At least thirty days prior to. the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of the Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bond or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon the partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's /attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of -9- receiving payment and for all other purposes, and:neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. -Notwithstanding any other provisions, of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the,Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this. in Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nomee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that:all acts, conditions and things required by -the Constitution and laws-of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to'be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied or agreed to levy special assessments on property°specially benefited by the-improvements financed by the Bonds and from ad valorem taxes heretofore duly levied on all taxable property in the,City, collectible in the years and amounts required'to produce sums not less than five percent in excess of the principal of and interest on such portion of the Bonds as-'such principal -and interest respectively become due; that if needed to-pay' the principal and interest on this Bond, additional ad valorem taxes will belevied upon all,taxable property. in the City without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does -not cause -the indebtedness of the City to'exceed any constitutional or statutory limitati6h. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit` under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate-of Authentication, hereon shall have'been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed'on its behalf 8y, the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. City Manager -10- CITY OF EDINA Mayor ____ .......... ..._ _ CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UTMA ................. Custodian ...................... in common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ................... TEN ENT -- as tenants (State) by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: -11- PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medalion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. [End of Bond Form.] 2.08. Use of Securities Depository; Book -Entry Only System. The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book -Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the "DTC Participants "), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the `Beneficial Owners "). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC's nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words "CEDE & CO." in this Resolution shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or -12- Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than -DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book -Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the. Book -Entry Only System; the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to,make available. printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (e) Notwithstanding any other provisions.of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the.Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. i (f) In the event that the Book -Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued, except as provided in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book -Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements with the -13- securities depository described herein, and thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository's rights under clause (e) above. Section 3. Use of Proceeds. 3.01. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. All proceeds of the Bonds received from the Purchaser allocated to the Refunding Bonds are irrevocably appropriated to pay and redeem the Refunded Bonds on the Redemption Date. The City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to redeem the Refunded Bonds on the Redemption Date. 3.02. General Obligation Bonds, Permanent Improvement Revolving, Fund Series 2013A Improvement Construction Fund. The City hereby establishes as a special subaccount in the Construction Fund of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2013 Improvement Construction Fund (the "Series 2013 Improvement Construction Fund ") as a separate bookkeeping account on its books and records. There shall be deposited into the Series 2013 Improvement Construction Fund, when and as received, the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds allocated to the Improvement Bonds. There shall be established a separate account within the Series 2013 Improvement Construction Fund to record expenditures for each Improvement. The moneys in the Series 2013 Improvement Construction Fund will be disbursed by the City, in accordance with this Resolution and the City's normal procedures, to pay (or reimburse the City for) the costs of the Improvements, including also the issuance costs of the Improvement Bonds pursuant to Section 8 hereof. At such time as the Improvements are completed the City shall transfer any remaining balance in the Series 2013 Improvement Construction Fund as provided in Resolution No. 2005 -70. Section 4. Bond Funds. So long as any of the Improvement Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City shall maintain a separate debt service fund on its official books and records to be known as the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2013 Bond Fund (the "Improvement Bond Fund ") within the Debt Service Account of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (the "Improvement Debt Service Account "), and the principal of and interest on the Improvement Bonds shall be payable from the Improvement Bond Fund. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Improvement Bond Fund (a) all moneys transferred with respect to the Improvement Bonds from other accounts within the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Improvement Debt Service Account in accordance with this Resolution; and (b) all other moneys as shall be appropriated by the City Council to the Improvement Bond Fund from time to time. On the business day preceding each date on which principal of or interest on the Improvement Bonds are to be paid by the City in accordance with this Resolution, the City Finance Director shall, without further direction by the Council, transfer from the Improvement Debt Service Account in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Improvement Bond Fund an amount sufficient to pay such principal and interest. If the aggregate balance in the Improvement Bond Fund is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all Improvement Bonds payable therefrom, the payment -14- shall be made from any fund of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund when the balance therein is sufficient, and the City Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient amount of ad valorem taxes to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or statutory limitation. The Refunding Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2013A Bond Fund (the "Refunding Bond Fund ") which the City agrees to maintain until the Refunding Bonds have been paid in full. If the moneys in the Refunding Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on the Refunding, Bonds, such amounts shall be paid,from other moneys on hand in other funds of the City, which otherfurids shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient; moneys become available in the Refunding Bond Fund. The moneys on hand in the Refunding Bond'Fund'from time to time shall be used only to pay the principal of and interest on the Refimding`$onds: Into the Refunding -Bond Fund shall be paid: (a) all taxes collected pursuant to Section 5.02 for the payment of the Refunding Bonds; and (b) any other funds appropriated by the Council for the payment of the Refunding Bonds. Section 5. Security Provisions. 5.01. Levy of Special Assessments. For the payment of the cost of the Improvements and the project refinanced by the Refunding Bonds the City has or will levy special assessments against all assessable lots; tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefor; based upon the benefits received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less than twenty percent (20 %) of the cost of the improvements. The City hereby covenants and agrees that for payment of the cost of the Improvements and of the project refinanced by the Refunding Bonds it will do and perform all acts and things necessary for the full and valid levy of special assessments against all assessable lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefor, based upon the benefits received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less than twenty percent (20 %) of the cost of the Improvements and of the project refinanced by the Refunding Bonds. In the event:that any such assessment shall be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken'by the City '.or this Council or any of the City's officers or employees, either in the making of such assessment -or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and this Council hereby covenant and agree that they will forthwith do all such further acts and take all such further proceedings as may be required by law to make such assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property. 5.02. Ad Valorem Taxes. The full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest in the Bonds as the same become respectively due. In order to produce aggregate amounts not less than 5% in excess of the amounts needed'to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Refunding Bonds, ad valorem taxes are hereby levied on all taxable property in the City, the taxes to be levied and collected in the following years and amounts: -15- Lew Years Collection Years Amount KLOPI-1-:3 1308I-66 IV DUN a This tax shall be irrepealabale as long as any of the Refunding Bonds are outstanding and unpaid; provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. 5.03. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and the interest on the Bonds, and the Improvement Bonds shall be payable from the Improvement Bond Fund and the Refunding Bonds shall be payable from the Refunding Bond Fund in accordance with the provisions and covenants contained in this Resolution. It is estimated that the special assessments levied and to be levied for the payment of the Improvements will be collected in amounts not less than five percent (5 %) in excess of the annual principal and interest requirements of the Bonds. Section 6. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 7. County Auditor Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money, Arbitrage and Official Statement. 7.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 7.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and -16- records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 7.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations ") as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the,- Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds e owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 7.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this Resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 7.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 7.06. Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purpose of Section 265(b) of the Code relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. The City represents that in calendar year 2013 it does not reasonable expect to issue tax- exempt obligations which are not private activity bonds (not treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds under Section 145 of the Code as private activity bonds for purposes of this representation) in an amount in excess of $10,000,000. 7.08. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated September _, 2013, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement -17- and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. 7.09. Reimbursement. The City certifies that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure with respect to the financed facilities which the City paid or will have paid more than 60 days prior to the issuance of the Bonds unless, with respect to such prior expenditures, the City shall have made a declaration of official intent which complies with the provisions of Section 1.150 -2 of the Regulations, provided that a declaration of official intent shall not be required (i) with respect to certain de minimis expenditures, if any, with respect to the financed facilities meeting the requirements of Section 1.150- 2(f)(1) of the Regulations, or (ii) with respect to "preliminary expenditures" for the financed facilities as defined in Section 1.150- 2(f)(2) of the Regulations, including engineering or architectural expenses and similar preparatory expenses, which in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the "issue price" of the Bonds. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 8, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 8, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 8 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this Resolution. As used in this Section 8, "Owner" or `Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any `Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, `Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds -18- through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding " means when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been cancelled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in Section 6 hereof. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1), on or before 365 days after, the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information "): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not, included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness, in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Current Property Valuations; Direct Debt; Tax Levies and Collections; Population Trend; Employment/Unemployment. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. -19- If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any ptt of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 8 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds: (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 -TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (H) Bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; -20- (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or a similar event with respect to the City; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material and (N) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. (3). In a timely: manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or .conditions:' (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d); . (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) as follows: (1) The City agrees -to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). (2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term-, Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this Section 8 'shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this Section 8 shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the -21- City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this Section 8 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 8 (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the.provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 8 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This Section 8 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 9. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Klein Bank, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Attest: Adopted this 17th day of September, 2013. -22- Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -23- COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION AND TAX LEVY The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on September 17, 2013, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $8,535,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A, dated as of October 10, 2013. I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register and the tax required by law for payment of the Bonds has been levied and filed, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of )2013. County Auditor (SEAL) CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO, $1,125,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013B Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on September 17, 2013 at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: _Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): Pages 1 through -19 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-80 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $1,125,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013B duly qualified -and acting recording officer of the public I, the undersigned, being the corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of September, 2013. Debra Mangen, City Clerk It was reported that proposals had.been received prior to 11:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $1,125,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been 'read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest` Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] Councilmember resolution and moved its adoption: then introduced the following RESOLUTION NO. 2013-80 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $1,125,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013B BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows`. Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. The City has presently outstanding its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009B, initially dated as of April 29, 2009 (the "Series 2009B Bonds "), its General Obligation Recreational Facilities Bonds, Series 2009C, initially dated as of December 10, 2009 (the "Series 2009C Bonds "), its Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012B, initially dated as of October 10, 2012 (the "Series 201 -213 Bonds ") and its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C (the "Series 2012C Bonds "), initially dated as of October 10, 2012 (the "Series 2012C Bonds "), issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655 (the "Act "), and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Series 2009B Bonds, Series 2009C Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds the Series 2012C Bond are payable primarily out of the net revenues to be derived from the municipal golf courses, ice arena, swimming pool and liquor stores of the City (the "Net Revenues "). This Council has previously determined to issue and sell $1,125,000 principal amount of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B, of the,City (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in connection with the construction of improvements, including reconstruction of a. golf dome for Braemar Golf Course (the "Project "), including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65. The Bonds are payable primarily out of the. Net Revenues. 1.02. Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the Net Revenues in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 exceeds the maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year on the Bonds, the Series 2009B Bonds, the Series 2009C Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds and the Series 2012C Bonds for which the Net Revenues are pledged (the Series 2009B Bonds, the Series 2009C Bonds and the Series 2012C Bonds are herein collectively referred to as the "Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds "). . 1.03. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, (_) proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of , of , and associates (the "Purchaser "), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.04. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Bond Terms; Rekistration; Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; Payment. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B, shall be originally dated as of October 10, 2013, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest, computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30 -day months, from October 10, 2013 until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2015 $60,000 2023 $75,000 2016 65,000 2024 80,000 2017 70,000 2025 80,000 2018 70,000 2026 80,000 2019 70,000 2027 85,000 2020 70,000 2028 85,000 2021 70,000 2029 90,000 2022 75,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. 2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2014, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. -2- 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The, effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) .Re ister. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner . thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar; duly executed by the registered owner thereof, or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new.Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however,, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of 'a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e)- Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the'endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal , in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as, the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal' of and, interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be. valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond. to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. -3- (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. 0) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Paying Agent. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 2015 through 2022 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 2023 through 2029 shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 2022 and on any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing on February 1, 20_ are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption -4- date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: Bonds Maturing on February 1, 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate . Payment Date Principal Amountl Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption thereof to be published as required by law and,-not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior -to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders .of any Bonds to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed impart in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.06. Execution Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved -or lithographed - facsimiles' of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, -5- executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2013B Interest Rate REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: Maturity Date of Date Original Issue CUSIP February I; 20_ October 10, 2013 CEDE & CO. THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, without option of prior payment, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2014 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $1,125,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to maturity date, interest rate, and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on September 17, 2013 (the "Resolution "), for the purpose of financing improvements to the City's golf course, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5;000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered Bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds of this issue maturing in 2022 and earlier years are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated' maturity dates in 2023 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or iri part, and if in part in. such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds maturing on the same date, on February 1, 2022 and any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the .principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing in the year 20_ shall be subject to man datory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium. Notice of redemption shall be given as provided in the following paragraph] As provided in .the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to -be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or. exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co.,, as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this -7- Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that, by the Resolution the City has pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds the net revenues of the City's golf courses, swimming pool, ice arena and liquor stores as shall be required to pay such principal and interest and on a parity with the pledge of such net revenues to the payment of other outstanding bonds of the City; that if necessary for payment of the principal and interest, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. CITY OF EDINA City Manager CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION Mayor This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UTMA ................. Custodian ............ , ......... in common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ................... TEN ENT -- as tenants (State) by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment mustcorrespond with the name as it appears upon the face-of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medalion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature -9- guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. [End of Bond Form.] 2.08. Use of Securities Depository; Book -Entry Only System. The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book -Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the "DTC Participants "), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the "Beneficial Owners "). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC's nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words "CEDE & CO." in this Order shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and. the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book -Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book -Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial -10- series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to. maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring, or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the' securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the . availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested.by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, whenever the _securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (e) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. (f) In the event that the Book -Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued, except as provided in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities, depository to the Beneficial Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book -Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements with the securities depository described herein, and thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository's rights under clause (e) above. Section 3. 2013B General Obligation Bonds Construction Fund. Proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited in a separate Series2013B General Obligation Bonds Bond Construction Fund (the "Construction Fund ") which shall be created and maintained on the books of the City as a separate account. The Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Project and of costs of issuance of the Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Project, any amounts remaining in the Construction Fund shall be credited and paid to the Bond Fund created pursuant to Section 4 hereof. -11- Section 4. Bond Fund. 4.01. 2013B General Obligation Bonds Bond Fund. The Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B Bond Fund (the "Bond Fund "), which the City agrees to maintain until the Bonds have been paid in full. If the moneys in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on the Bonds, such amounts shall be paid from other moneys on hand in other funds of the City, which other funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys become available in the Bond Fund. There shall be credited to the Bond Fund the following: (a) All collections of any taxes levied for the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, including the Net Revenues herein pledged and appropriated to the Bond Fund. (b) The sum of $ from Net Revenues, which amount shall be credited to a separate subaccount in the Bond Fund as a reserve for the Bonds as required by the Act, and which amounts equal the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Bonds and is required to be deposited therein pursuant to the Act. (c) Any other funds appropriated by the City for the payment of the Bonds. 4.02. Pledge of Net Revenues. The Net Revenues are hereby irrevocably pledged and appropriated to the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon when due and the maintenance of the reserve account required by the Act. The pledge of the Net Revenues to the payment of the Bonds and maintenance of the reserve account is on a parity with the pledge of the Net Revenues to the payment of the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds. Nothing herein shall preclude the City from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of the Net Revenues for payment of additional obligations of the City hereafter authorized if the Council determines before the authorization of such additional obligations that the estimated Net Revenues will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to the payment of the Bonds, the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds and additional obligations, for payment of the Bonds, the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds and such additional obligations. Such further pledges and appropriations of Net Revenues may be made superior or subordinate to, or on a parity with, the pledge and appropriation herein made. Section 5. Pledge of Taxing Powers. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become due, the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. It is, however, presently estimated that the funds appropriated pursuant to Section 4 hereof will provide sums not less than 5% in excess of principal and interest on the Bonds when due, and therefore no tax levy is presently required. Section 6. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are -12- due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before tliat date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are .then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably,in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be 'so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at- such rates and maturing or callable at the holder's option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 7. County Auditor Registration Certification of Proceedings Investment of Money Arbitrage and Official Statement. 7.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 7:02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 7.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the. Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations ".), as are enacted or promulgated and -in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income.,of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. . -13- 7.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this Resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 7.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 7.06. Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purpose of Section 265(b) of the Code relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. The City represents that in calendar year 2013 it does not reasonable expect to issue tax- exempt obligations which are not private activity bonds (not treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds under Section 145 of the Code as private activity bonds for purposes of this representation) in an amount in excess of $10,00000. 7.07. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated September _, 2013, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 8, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in -14- equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 8, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 8 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this Resolution. As used in this Section 8, "Owner" or `Bondowner ".means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any `Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar'eyidence of such beneficial. ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to_the Registrar. As used herein, `Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or, entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, .to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees,,depositones or -other intermediaries), or.(b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding " means when used with reference to.Bonds means all Bonds whi&have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been cancelled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in Section 6 hereof. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City; the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information "): (A) ,. the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, 1. prepared in, accordance with generally,accepted accounting principles in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have.not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effectthereof, and certified as to accuracy; and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, -15- which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Current Property Valuations; Direct Debt; Tax Levies and Collections; Population Trend; Employment/Unemployment. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 8 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds: (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; SUZ (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (I) Bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or a similar event with respect to the City; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material and (N) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this. Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this Section 8 pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. -17- (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) as follows: (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). (2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied ,by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this Section 8 shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this,Section 8,shall terminate, and. be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative. actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements, of this Section 8 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any, statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 8. (and the form. and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended orsupplemented by the City from time'to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the' Qwners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council -filed in the office of the recording officer of the,City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who I may rely on certificates of 'the City and others and the opinion may be subject to'customary qualifications, to the'' effect thaf: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made. .in- con nection with.a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a- change in the identity nature or status of the City or the'type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required byj or better complies:with, the, provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 8 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary- offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances. applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the. City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. ' (3) This Section 8 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. -18- Section 9. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Klein Bank, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Adopted this 17th day of September, 2013. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 6L2 COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on September 17, 2013, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form,and details of an issue of $1,125,000 General Obligation, Bonds, Series 2013B, dated as of October 10, 2013. I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. WITNESS -my hand and:official seal this . day,of 2013. County Auditor (SEAL) J owe vt�li) ,aas To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.B. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion ❑X Date: September 17, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Sketch Plan - 6725 York Avenue ( Wicke's site) and five single family homes on Exerxes Avenue to the ear of 6725 York. Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. Information / Background: The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the property at 6725 York Avenue. The proposed project also includes five single - family homes on Xerxes Avenue. The applicant is in negotiation with these property owners to purchase the homes, and incorporate them into the development. The property at 6725 York (the former Wicke's building site) is currently zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District -3, and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. The five- single family homes are zoned and guided for low density residential use. The applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing commercial building, and the five single - family homes and build a six -story, 273 unit upscale apartment building with 22,289 square feet of retail (potential super market/deli) on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue, with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Surface spaces would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident guests. The loading area for the market would be at the rear of the retail building and south side of the apartment building. (See plans and narrative on pages A3 —A17 of the Planning Commission Memo.) To accommodate the request, four amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 66 feet. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 59. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from 1.0 to 1.55. ➢ Re- guiding the land use for the six single - family homes from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. A rezoning of all the properties would then be required to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Planning Commission Consideration: On July 24, 2013, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: Minutes from the August 28, 2013 Edina Planning Commission meeting - Planning Commission Memo, August 28, 2013 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501 St. • Edina, MN 55424 Commissioner Potts recused himself from the discussion. Planner Comments Planner Teague told the Commission staff received a Sketch Plan Review for 6725 York Avenue (the former Wick's). Teague explained the applicant is in negotiation with the owners of Wick's and the five (5) residential homes fronting Xerxes Avenue. Teague stated the subject site is currently zoned PCD -3. Continuing, Teague said the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing commercial and the five single family homes and build a six - story, 273 unit upscale apartment building with 22,289 square feet of retail space on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail component on York with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Teague reported to accommodate the request four (4) amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required as follows: • Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 66 feet • Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 82 • floor Area Ratio — from 1.0 to 3.1 • Re- guiding the land use for the six single - family homes from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. Teague concluded the applicant is considering a rezoning of the properties to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Chmielewski, Lennar Multifamily Investors, LLC Applicant Presentation Mr. Chmielewski gave a brief history on Lennar and explained that originally they only considered the Wick's site; however felt only utilizing that site pushed the envelope so they decided to approach residential property owners on Xerxes to obtain those houses and add them to the site. Continuing, Chmielewski said they.propose to build a high -end luxury Multifamily rental community with complimentary retail. Chmielewski introduced Aaron Russet to further speak to the proposal. Mr. Russet told the Commission they are very happy to be in Edina. Russet referred to the density and explained that the calculations presented in the redevelopment materials did not include the five single family homes they are hoping to acquire. Continuing, Russet explained they are proposing to build a 273 -unit upscale multifamily complex that is six (6) stories with retail below. Russet said the attraction to this site is the walkability factor, adding from this Page 9of14 location the residents of the building have access to all venues, shopping, City Park, library, Government Center, etc. Russet further explained that their intent is to create an urban mixed -use, pedestrian friendly sustainable community. As previously mentioned by Mr. Chmielewski the area offers abundance to amenities and this creates an environment without dependence on daily automobile trips. Continuing, Russet said they are committed to sustainable design principles reflected in the City's Comprehensive Plan. He added their intent will feature green elements including green construction, practices, material specification, thermal high- efficiency windows and numerous planted green spaces both on the site as well as on the roof. Russet said they are also working with the White Group on sustainability. With graphics Mr. Russet concluded highlighting the following aspects of the project: • Open terraces on both ends of the project (pocket parks) • Walking paths of high quality pavement. • Decorative lighting • Front doors • All parking is proposed to be contained within • Building i.s designed-open'to the south • Exterior building materials include transparent glass storefront, masonry and "Edina" limestone at street level. Above includes composition of masonry, architectural metal and large amounts of glass • Unit breakdown 7% studio. 40% one bedroom, 11% one bedroom plus den and 32% two bedrooms. Chair Staunton thanked the development team for their presentation and explained the Sketch Plan Review process is informal and nonbinding. Commissioner Grabiel stated he was encouraged that someone was considering purchasing the site and redeveloping the property. Grabiel acknowledged he was somewhat concerned when he first reviewed the materials; however, if the five residential homes are acquired that's a different story. Grabiel asked if three bedrooms or two bedrooms plus den were ever considered. Mr. Russet responded that this development would be a "rent by choice" and they have found that many people that rent by choice are either downsizing or desire smaller living space. Russet explained that at this time they are waiting for an update of the market study; however, it appears the market may be for smaller spaces. Continuing, Grabiel acknowledged this is an area of heightened activity, questioning if the market is sound for.this type of project in such a dense area. Russet responded that population metrics indicated a drop in home ownership and for every percent home ownership drops a million families need a home. Walkability is also a very important factor in home choice and this area is highly walkable. Page 10 of 14 Commissioner Carpenter asked if the owners of the homes have been contacted. Mr. Chmielewski said that process is continuing through a real estate broker adding two of the homes are in foreclosure and it takes a little more time when working with banks. Commissioner Carr stated she really loves the look of the building but does have a concern with the proposed density; which is clearly on the high side. Carr said she agreed with the comments from Grabiel especially on unit size, adding the two bedroom with den in her opinion would be an attractive choice. Carr said in her opinion the project is intriguing and if special care is taken in buffering the residential properties in Richfield this may be a good project. Concluding Carr noted that with regard to the retail space depicted on the plans the applicant should be aware for future retail tenants that the abutting property is a large grocery store. Mr. Chmielewski said with regard to unit numbers, spacing and size it's important to find the right density to ensure that the project will be successful. Chmielewski said the property owners reside in New York City and their price for the subject property reflects the New York City market. Chmielewski said the development team would take under advisement all comments from the Commission and would make every effort to buffer Xerxes Avenue. He added at this time their intent through design is to make the units feel and look like town homes /brownstones vs. the traditional apartment building look. Commissioner Schroeder said he finds the project and site plan interesting, adding he likes the connectivity and other elements of the project; however has a few concerns about the Xerxes Avenue side. Schroeder said the Xerxes Avenue component of the project is the most difficult to address. He pointed out as presented the proposed facade facing Xerxes Avenue is imposing. He suggested that they reconsider the large facade and relocate a portion of the building by placing it on top of the building nearest France Avenue. This change; in his opinion, would better suit the site, adding height in this area is generally found along York Avenue; not Xerxes (Westin, new Southdale apartments etc.). Continuing Schroeder pointed out when considering the projects impact on Xerxes Avenue, vehicle traffic, especially truck traffic, needs to be further reviewed. Schroeder stated if left as is all truck traffic would only occur on Xerxes Avenue. Concluding Schroeder asked the applicants to consider "marrying" the subject sites loading dock area with the Cub Foods loading dock. This action would reduce.and mitigate all delivery traffic. Commissioner Scherer complemented the look of the building but shared concerns over the amount of concrete on the site and its impact on Richfield. Commissioner Platteter stated that overall he's not opposed to the density of the project or building height; however, has a concern with the ramp accessing the underground parking. Platteter suggested that this access point be relocated more to the middle to avoid confusion. With regard to connectivity Platteter said he likes the incorporation this project includes to enhance pedestrian spaces. Concluding, Platteter said he also supports the requirement for affordable housing. Page 11 of 14 Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if he knows the zoning classification the City of Richfield has on their side of Xerxes (east). Teague responded he's not sure of that zoning. He added he knows that Richfield either has or is going through a rezoning process for this area to allow for more density. Grabiel said during the review process the City needs to keep in mind what's best for Edina while being respectful to the City of Richfield. The development team acknowledged that much of their focus is in "the devils in the details ", adding they really appreciate the comments from the Commission. Mr. Russet acknowledged this site is a challenge; however believes it's worth it. Commissioner Forrest said that while the project has good points she is concerned with how portions of the project violate the Comprehensive plan. Forrest added as previously mentioned the homes across the street from this project will be impacted. She concluded she likes the look but has concerns. The discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that the project has merit; however, wants the development team to take a further look at reducing the buildings impact on Xerxes Avenue, increase greenspace where possible, consider the City Comprehensive Plan during the design process, reconsider the fagade of the building as it relates to Xerxes Avenue, carefully consider the retail tenant mix, better design the building's access point and continue to work on the loading dock area and the underground parking access, etc. Also it is very important to work with the residents of Richfield to reduce and or minimize the buildings impact on them. Chair Staunton thanked the applicant for sharing their sketch plan with them. Staunton stated he hopes their venture is successful adding that so far no one has found something that could work for this site. Staunton reiterated his thanks and stressed to the applicant the importance of communicating with the City of Richfield. The applicants ensured Chair Staunton they would engage the City of Richfield and Xerxes Avenue residents. B. 2014 Chair Staunton told the C mission every fall the nning Commission Work Plan is discussed and prioritized. Staunton sal hat at this tim a would like Commissioners to start thinking about the 2014 Work Plan. Sta on said topic suggestions should be forwarded to Teague or him prior to the Commission m tin Staunton concluded that his goal for finalizing the Work Plan is for some time in Sept er or October. Commissioner Scherer noted4may be a %pod idea to discuss the Work Plan prior to a Commission meeting. Co missioners VIII. CORR ONDENCE AND PE Page 12 of 14 DIP 3D M& City Hall • Phone 952- 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com _. . Date: August 28, 2013 To: Planning Commission ME®- .. From: Cary-Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 6725 York Avenue (Wick's Site) — Agenda Item VII.A. The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the property at 6725 York Avenue. (See property location on pages Al A2.) The proposed project also includes five single- family homes on Xerxes Avenue. The applicant is in negotiation with these property owners to purchase the homes, and incorporate them into the development. The property at 6725 York (the former Wick's building site) is currently zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District -3, and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. The five - single family homes are zoned. and guided for low density residential use. The applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing commercial building, and the five single- family homes and build a six -story, 273 unit upscale apartment building with 22,289 square feet of retail (potential super market/deli) on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue, with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments.. Surface spaces would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident guests. The loading area for the market would be at the rear of the retail building and south side of the apartment building. (See plans and narrative on pages A3 —A17.) To accommodate the request, four: amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height - from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 66 feet. ➢ - Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 59: ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from 1.0 to 1.55. Re- guiding the.land use for the six single- family homes from Low Density - Residential to Community Activity Center. A rezoning of all the properties would then be required to PUD, Planned Unit Development. I City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 MEMO A oeAF� U) �yo The compliance table below demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the current zoning of PCD -3: * Variance or would require change to PUD The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current use of the site. However, the proposed density is significant, and more than doubles the density allowed in the Comprehensive Plan; and the FAR proposed is triple what is allowed. Edina does not have an all -age high density residential project with over 50 units per acre. The recently approved senior housing project at 6500 France Avenue is the only project over 50 units per acre. That project was approved in part because of the connection to the hospital, and it is restricted to senior housing. See the table on the following page. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard (PCD -3) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — York Avenue 66 feet 100+ feet Front — Xerxes 66 feet 25 feet* Avenue 66 feet . 51 feet* Side = North 66 feet 55 feet* Rear — South Building Height Four stories and Six Stories & 48 feet 66 feet* Maximum Floor Area 1.0% 1.55 %* Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls 127 — retail 131 spaces exterior (retail & guest parking) 273 enclosed 373 stalls enclosed (residential) Parking Stall Size 8.5'x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance or would require change to PUD The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current use of the site. However, the proposed density is significant, and more than doubles the density allowed in the Comprehensive Plan; and the FAR proposed is triple what is allowed. Edina does not have an all -age high density residential project with over 50 units per acre. The recently approved senior housing project at 6500 France Avenue is the only project over 50 units per acre. That project was approved in part because of the connection to the hospital, and it is restricted to senior housing. See the table on the following page. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CIMT�lY OO F _.DhNA High Density Development in Edina MEMO wgiN�l A 0 e A\ TS t4 Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 6500 France — Senior Housing 6500 France 179, 76 TRAFFIC /SITE ACCESS A traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. The. applicant is proposing that same right -in and right -out access.arrangement as existing.. An additional access is proposed off Xerxes Avenue facing Richfield. AFFORDABLE HOUSING The. applicant is not proposing. any affordable housing as part of this project. However, given the proposed density, rezoning and the Comprehensive Plan Amendments required to accommodate the proposal, this project, rovides an opportunity to require an affordable housing. If 10% of the units were required to be affordable, per. Met Council standards, the City could gain 27 units towards its goal established of 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020 with the Met Council. (See pages A2a -A2b.) City of Edina.• 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 cm, alp MM& MEMO w9tN�11rL n� SUSTAINABLE DESIGN As indicated in- the project narrative, the applicant is pledging this project to include sustainable design principles. (See page A5.) Through the use of the PUD zoning, the city could provide protections to ensure.that the building proposed is actually constructed_ , sustainable design is utilized, and if desired affordable housing is provided. City of Edina .•. 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Interactive Maps // SOUTHDALE C11i Parcel i L6 29- 028 -24 -31 -0003 W Owner Nha Birmingham Llc Et Al �z Parcel Y Address: Edina, MN 55435 j Property Q Type: }f X31 i 'i stead: I I i i Parcel 29- 028 -24 -31 -0003 ID: Owner Nha Birmingham Llc Et Al Name: Parcel 6725 York Ave S Address: Edina, MN 55435 j Property Commercial- Preferred Type: Home- Non - Homestead stead: Parcel 3.33 acres Area: 145,096 sq ft Pro eft p Y Map «i 41 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 A TIMk Green! i Interactive Maps ,r v Welcome Results 6725 York Avenue, Edina Find a PID or an address on the map PID: 2902824310003 6725 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 Owner /Taxpayer Nha Birmingham Llc Owner: Et Al Taxpayer: School Dist: 280 Sewer Dist: Watershed Dist: 1 Parcel 3.33 acres Parcel Area: 145,096 sq ft Legend Measure Parcel -Nei hborhoodS _ •'� ., Street i _ p- City, 0 it 2 AL 4. ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan Q49�.��My Figure 4.3 City of Edina Future Land Use Plan Yes. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS fvLFI 0 05 Me, Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 a Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -25 a�9eA. '�` 1 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business \�;. /� 2008 Comprehensive Plan City Affordability Goals Since 1996, Edina has participated in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act program. The Livable Communities Act (LCA) is a Metropolitan Council grant -based program to encourage communities to achieve goals in affordable and life -cycle housing production and quality of life improvements. At the program's inception, the Metropolitan Council estimated the amount of the City's existing housing stock that was affordable and the City and the Metropolitan Council jointly established goals for the criteria of affordability, life -cycle housing (housing types that are not single - family detached units) and housing density. See Table 5.2 on next page. Table 5.2. Livable Communities Act Benchmarks and Goals for Edina Table 5.2 shows the Metropolitan Council's 1995 estimates and City of Edina goals: Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — A d h 5 -5 Chapter 5: Housing City Index Benchmark Goal Affordability Ownership 31% 64 -77% 31% Rental 14% 32 -45% 43% Life -cycle housing Type (non -SF detached 43% 38-41% 43% Owner /renter mix 71/29% (64 -71)/ (30-36)% 71/29% Density Single- family detached 2.3 /acre 2.3 -2.9 /acre 2.3 /acre Multi-family 16 /acre 11 -15 /acre 16 /acre Table 5.2 shows the Metropolitan Council's 1995 estimates and City of Edina goals: Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — A d h 5 -5 Chapter 5: Housing ti o e }° for living, learning, raising families & doing business n �° 2008 Comprehensive Plan ■ The City Index column refers to a snapshot of the Edina's affordable housing, life -cycle housing, and housing density taken from the data available in 1995. AF The Benchmark column is a range that represents the City Index average for communities within similar Metropolitan Council planning sectors. ■ The Goal column indicates the affordable and life - cycle housing share, and the densities negotiated between Edina and the Metropolitan Council. ■ Affordability refers to the estimate of the share of Edina's affordable housing stock that was considered affordable at the start of the LCA program. ■ Life -cycle Housing includes housing types that are not single - family detached units; the figures are percentages based on Edina's total housing stock. ■ Density means the number of housing units per acre for both single - family detached units, and multi - family units. The Metropolitan Council has identified new affordable housing needs for all cities and townships within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area for the period from 2011 -2020. The housing plan element of local comprehensive plans is required to reflect the allocated portion of the forecasted demand for affordable housing. The City's share of this allocation is 212 affordable housing units.by 2020. Current City Housing Programs Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) was established in 1974 for the purpose of undertaking urban redevelopment projects and assisting with the development of affordable housing. The HRA has facilitated the development of a number of low- and moderate - income housing developments, including Yorkdale Townhomes, Oak Glen, Summit Point and South Haven. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — /� �C 5 -6 Chapter 5: Housing / 1 LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS 1 1300 E. WOODFIELD RD, SUITE 304 1 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 1 847.592.3350 LEPAMAW LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS ATTN: Cary Teague, Community Development Director The City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 August 15th, 2013 Dear Mr. Cary Teague, Please find the attached plans for the proposed development at the Wickes Furniture site at 6725 York Avenue South in Edina, Minnesota. We appreciate the time you and your staff have given us over the past few months. We are excited for the opportunity to continue our work and move this project forward. In an effort to ensure that we create a development that enhances the neighborhood and surrounding community while also embracing the long -term strategies for the city of Edina, we have met with the following people over the past few months: • James Hovland - Mayor • Scott Neal - City Manager • Cary Teague - Community Development Director • Bill Neuendorf - Economic Development Manager • Joni Bennett - City Council Member • Ann Swenson - City Council Member • Mary Brindle - City Council Member • Josh Sprague - City Council Member Their insight and ideas have been invaluable to our progress and have already directly impacted the designs for this development. We look forward to the sketch plan review and will continue to use this input to create the best project possible. Please let me know if you have any questions or immediate comments to our plans. Kind Regards, Peter Chmielewski Assoc. AIA, LEED AP, MBA Development Manager Lennar Multifamily Investors, LLC !oil "Imim PAN ��: NA W4 .!.I- m! .Zi . rig �;,xy: r� � � tilde 'atl�����i� -T FLATS ff loll will eSG architects ilia =a N ®I NA NMI1\11, R13 Sq, 7 —I - I-- �; ll .— as ..... i - -i—,_ - .'' -,z TL 13 1 1 m =I i 71 UK ,me, MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 6725 York Avenue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 iii.-.Team DEVELOPER: LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS, LLC (LMI) Lennar Corporation (NYSE: LEN) is a Miami -based homebuilder founded in 1954, with a market capitalization of over $6.8 billion. It has offices in 33 markets and 16 states, and employs approximately 4.000 associates nationwide: In mid -2011, Lennar created Lennar Multifamily Investors, LLC (LNiI), a company that specializes in the development, management, construction, and ownership of Class - •, A multifamily communities across the nation. Llvil's core vision is to work in topaier cities with lop tier architccls to create luxury condorninium quality rental communities. Since its founding, LMI has attracted 'an outstanding team of seasoned professionals, has purchased 12 sites and contracted for 16 more. Five projects are under construction and the company has plans to start 11 more projects in 2013. LMI's pipeline includes over 10,000 units and S2.6 billion in total development,cost. Beyond the numbers, LMI is led by professionals that are passionate about creating vibrant communities that positively impact not only the residents, but also the surrounding communities that we become an integral part of. , ARCHITECT:.ELNESS SIN ENSON GRAHAM ARCHITECTS (ESG) Since our founding in 1970, Elness Swenson Graham (ESG) Architects has helped our clients create environments for business, community and leisure. In doing so; we have gained the experience and ability to .`deliver high quality designs for many building types. But this alone is not enough to achieve our mission. The essence of ESG is more than just architecture and bulldings. Throughout our entire lime, our commitment to enriching cur built environment has remained steadfast. It's a commitment that drives us to go beyond the expected to deliver the superior, the timeless, the memorable and the unique; to create environments • that capture the human spirt and uplift our lives. This is what we do best. We strive to combine our clients' needs and stewardship for the environment with our knowledge of buildings, markets and culture to deliver uplifting and forward - looking design solutions. The experience derived from our work allows us to offer each client a great breadth of informed and integrated services. %Ne bring holistic solutions to complex problems. We create truly unique environments that enhance our communities and help our clients successfully pursue their goals in the development and construction industries. Project. Purpose and Vision The purpose and vision for this multifamily development in Edina is to create a high -end luxury rental community with complimentary retail. This complimentary high -end retail tenant (such as a high end fresh grocer / deli or olher community based retail tenant) will flourish with the other shopping opportunities along York Avenue while also adding an incredible lifestyle value to the residents of the building. This development will give Edina residents a wonderful living option as they downsize, retire, move, etc. while still staying in the community they love. The project will also establish a better utilization for the Wickes furniture site and eliminate the existing dated structure. We strongly believe that this project will become a catalyst for future redevelopment opportunities for other properties going North along York Avenue. The strong pedestrian connection and community terraces will dramatically enhance the walkabiBly of this area with connection into and throughout the site. Special attention has been paid tov ✓ard the building materials and massing to properly fit within this community; creating a place that is " Pure Edina" by incorporating elements from the surrounding areas such as the limestone that is on City Hall and other Edina structure. esc -__ -- LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS Architectural Description The architectural design and massing of this project is based on guidance from urban design and architectural design principles developed in the City of Edina's land use plans and timeless city building strategies. The design and massing creates a new fabric and a better street definition along York and Xerxes Avenues. The design implements active street -level d .,olling units on the North, South, and East facades of the building. A large opening in the building massing on the south facade of the second level will allow great sun penetration into the amenity courtyard. The architectural expression and materials of this project will incorporate contemporary materials and facade composition. The building materials will feature a transparent glass storefront, masonry, and "Edina" limestone at the street level. Above which will float a traditionally inspired composition of masonry, architectural metal, and large amounts of glass. Special attention has been paid toward proper setbacks, material usage, landscaping, and privacy along Xerxes Avenue where our development is adjacent to the single family residential community. AVE. Streetscape and Public Realm . The design of this development features strectscape improvements including new pavement, street trees, and lighting. The groundscape will feature green landscape elements, high quality pavement, pedestrian gathering and sitting areas, and decorative lighting. The sidewalks will wrap the entire site allowing neighboring properties a through -way access from York Avenue to Xerxes. This pedestrian connection will also create a one -third of a mile walking path around the site as a safe walking path for residences and the community. Distinct nodes will be linked to these sidewalks as community, terraces. These nodes will both highlight the residential entrance and commercial tenant on each side of the facade facing York Avenue. Green and Sustainable Features The key sustainability, strategy for this project is to create an urban mixe -usc, pedestrian friendly community that allows residents to live, work, and play without dependence on daily automobile usage. The mixed use development v✓ill include a complimentary retail tenant to the residential tenants. The development learn is committed to the sustainable design principles reflected in the City's comprehensive plan. Our sustainable design mission is to promote livable communities through the use of energy efficient systems, green bullding practices, reduced dependency on automobiles, creative density, high quality pedestrian and bicycle public rea!rn, and the preservation of natural resources. The project will feature a series of green elements including green construction practices, materials specification, thermal high- efficiency :windows and exterior envelope, and numerous permeable planled green spaces both on the site as well as on the amenity level roof- MULTI - FAMILY DEVELOPMEN -i- 6725 York Avenue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 d-� VICINITY f . SITIE EXISTING CONDITION - VIEW FROM YORK AVE S Site Neighborhood Height Comparison Edina Towers Southdale Fairview Thrivent Financial Thrvent United Properties Site Southdale Mall Southdale Office Ctr The Westin York Place I 17 Stories - 210' 9 Stories - 100' 7 Stories - 80' Financial 4 Stories - 48' 6 Stories - 67' 2 Stories - 40' 7 Stories - 80' Edina Gallerla 4 Stories - 3 Stories - 40' I 18 Stories - 236' .J I I I ( I - — - — - — - — - — - — - --------- •- - - - - -J ------ - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------- .............. ... ............... '------ - - - - -. ........................... ............................................... ..................... ....... . .. ......... ............ .......... ---- ..--.....---.------------------- -- ------------ - - - - -- - -------------------------------------------------- ----------- Building Height Comparison PAP I 1 • y f � C-1 �v aim Rim ■� 4s i� M! Is Mq vA�r r t■ att �N -� ►%w �r ��. irk Iii: 1i wI� AM-AN 1 ra ii 1. .,� Mom owl R,�� FLATS N 011"WAir �i� i wrap. iinmi M Imam again t■.■ w _ 211IMMEW tun"' j ' � � s.. by `• a r. _- ��� � �� vn��;k ` 'f��- eSG L E N N A IZ MULTI- FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 6725 York Avenue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 architects LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS 5 wry+ ✓ . T t p s • �.� _ r zi • ��'4 ! 1� i•^'Y` ka y j ± ' _._ire•-' . ` . w. -.. i _ 't I 110 ;17 on low `' � �Lre � ' �I�. t�',�c��� ;:'�'•�' 't ■�j 1��� '�� glow No IGjit+yr�lf iuI 4� • �' id'Jfe'3 11 R, � .�; �7II �. ;, .a "',E, �M= ; r.�� ��'�������� I Ij�� d�.�� - '•` i��'�" i�iIL�lbie WA m oS:�J �lel Aa ® in !�,- e� AU r! M IA �i te>• lulu �C C Cdu IHn >� Cv� ►�t„ c� IIM Ili r�` t. a■ IS t■o !� Rim tt�1 ��O! ffll ��1 >• �':�r �� 1 n�= , :� �� /'�� �\ r'�0. ■.. �ii�er.m r ouu �1 ■ �IIN YII >•�� m � I�1 u • `,�,••, i yy o �`I �i IIAl11A� ��B�III t "� /:. r. reie;y►J _ "'Its '' r j.: ti1�i14h -- - � � ` - sue'— r� _� � :� - �,,, � .. t y {r.,, •k,. eSG L E N N A M MULTI - FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 6725 York Avenue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 architects LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS 6 Bill�;, �_� al Ii, eA �� z��� a -t.��� Il ��� ■ 17 lj IV i eS G L E N N A 1w architects LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS .. � 11t el I° E- RIM Rim INA pi �-7-7 '7 7Z: MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 6725 York Avenue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 7 WFIR �' 1011. Idl _q RN real dr Ei R_ '.19 =F F' � liq --b 3: ' ::tom "= �]�I�il. �a~ ' Y;aiJ�14, A "q i� 7t 1 r471 .0 1`rw R- - 111L�. IL lag W� XERXES AVE e SG LENNAFT MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 6725 York Avenue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS eSG L N N A Ii MULTI - FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 6%255 York Avenue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 —1-1. LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS q 1,13337 17i133f 79�5&F 1 79.11 11IR DIN I 1,0 �5f I,O�Si I I,090RSi ]1,35F 7938 SF N 7985E 11 1,20 �Sf IF 0 I BB 728 SF O I gR 28 SF a pc` 1,0G2 5f 19R 728 OR 0 1 BR 1 729 SF D ctu BRo OM FITNESS R P F 2,270 5F 1,552 SF S66 SF Bar& Bar& Grill Grill Q" — eeaaeeae- Ej _-Z m m_m Casa c BD z ®..� c ®�'.. ® 6B8B88BBOBB- Outdoor Fire mo 0 0 � 1 BR 1 BR DEN 709 SF 716 5F 64 i 1.1361 F I B76L3F kW 704 SF I 704SF I I,IZOBORSF Level 2 Plan Levels 3 -6 Plan �? � 1 BR 2 e R z eP 1 8R IBR 1 BP DEN 758 SF � 743 5F G 7S8 SF Sa 1,07] SF 1,077 SF 158 SF 793 SF 874 SF 7 8R rl 1 BR DEN 1,122 5F 903 SF IBR 728 SF I BR 2 BR 728 SF 1.077 SF 1 8R 726 SF NII, z en 1,062 SF 2 BR Roofof 1.077 SF CommerciaBelow 1,062 SF sT 546 SF 1 :728 SF 1 8R 2 BR 728 SF 1.077 SF 1BR I BR 732 SF 724 SF I PR DEN 1 984 SF I BR 758 SF ST 5ioruge 564 SF 1 RR 764 SF 2 RR 1,100 SF 1 RP 704 SF ST — 603 SF Elec E��I F 2 BR i BR 1 6R DEN 1 1,069 SF 704 SF 916 SF 2 BR 1,136 SF �T 178 SF _ 1 9P 709 F I BP 704 SF 2 BP I.I00 SF Levels 3 -6 Plan Level P1 Plan A.... .... . . 1 2 3 4 B 5 6 1 7 8 j 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 c T-21--o-.hu-o", 30'-0* D 31' - 0" 31' 2q '-O" 31'-.0'. 50-0" 2B, -O „ I/29' -O'• y 25-0” 16-0' ry H Level P1 Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 j 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 T-21--o-.hu-o", 30'-0* 51'-0* 31' - 0" 31' 2q '-O" 31'-.0'. 50-0" 2B, -O „ I/29' -O'• y 25-0” 16-0' Level P1 Plan ROOF LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL 5 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL I LEVEL PI �44 Section ��Ill�lqw min Ll Lin FIlmm'l mmlm!!Ilmml , U.. �11. lll�Plm 11 11 ■■ 11 �!■ -",-I nUP ■■ 1■ ■ ■' 11 1■ ■■ 11 i 11 ■■ 11 II -,I�1► ■i� . � . I��! ■I�l�l�! .�I�l�l�le1! ■I ■! ■il �44 Section .'ice 6725 York Ave 5, Edina MN Lennar Homes Mixed -Use Development Residential Retail I o„cl I1c Tn 1 r_rr D --,inn r1r Dut.il A—onit„ Ant rcF Ant DCF I Initc Dar4ino* Par4ino =- Minus One Parking 93,014 93,014 7 11 18 Level 1 230 5 Level 1 Res / Parking /Retail 92,315 50,756 22,289 25 19,270 10,720 11 143 121 Level Res /Amenity 49,102 20 55 5,157 43,945 36,590 42 6 20 Level Residential 55,104 4 25 6 55,104 48,206 55 Level Residential 55,104 55,104 48,206 55 Level Residential 55,104 55,104 48,206 55 Level Residential 55,104 55,104 48,206 55 Total 454,847 143,770 22,289 `12 of the Level 1 spaces are outside **Retail spaces are all outside Unit Distribution Summary In„nl fli, rlin 1 no 1 Roma 13 Qo 283,631 240,134 273 Tandem Total I lnile ft.dc Level 1 0 4 0 7 11 18 Level 4 18 5 15 42 57 Level 4 25 6 20 55 75 Level 4 25 6 20 55 75 Level 4 25 6 20 55 75 Level 4 25 6 20 55 75 373 121 18 390 Total Zo 1ZZ Z9 luZ Z73 375 % 7% 45% 11% 37% Avg Size 566 735 920 1,102 ESG Architects Inc. July 8, 2013 Metrics York Condo Association 7200 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 August 28, 2013 Members of the Edina Planning Commission: We were shocked to learn of plans to build an apartment building on the Borotka Furniture site at.6725 York Avenue. We wish to voice our strong opposition to adding additional multi - family housing on this section of York Avenue. Traffic on York Avenue as well as 66h and 76h Streets running east and west has increased substantially over the last five years. Those of us living in this corridor are already concerned about how we will absorb the additional traffic generated by the apartments being built at Byerly's and Southdale. Many senior citizens live in the area because of proximity to grocery stores and the library. Because of heavy traffic, it has become increasingly difficult for them to pull their cars onto York. Avenue or to cross the street safely. It seems unthinkable to consider adding yet another apartment building within a four block area. We are also concerned about the increase in the transient population, which is unlikely to have much interest in investing in the neighborhood. Transients also change the character of the area. Finally, we believe additional. apartments and their impact on our neighborhood may result in lower property values on our properties. It is possible that the increased revenue to the City from another development will reduce the amount of revenue currently generated by our building and others in the area Please consider the very negative impact additional Housing will have on those already living in- this area and oppose this project. Yours truly, York Condo Association Board of Directors Don McRae, President R � PORT / R � COO MMr :�NDATION 0 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.C. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑x Discussion Date: September 17; 2013 Information F1 Subject: Second Reading — Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding the R- I & R -2, Zoning District requirements for Building Coverage, Setback, Height and General Regulations; Ordinance No. 2013 =09. Action Requested: Adopt the attached Ordinance amending Section 850.04. Information /Background: The attached Ordinance includes the Council recommendation to include an option for side yard setback on lots 61 -74 feet in width. The options include meeting the current setback requirements, and the revised setbacks proposed by the planning commission. ATTACHMENTS: • Council report from August 5, 2013. • Draft Ordinance dated 9- 17 -13. as recommended by the City Council. City of Edina . • 4801 W. 501" Sc Edina, MN 55424 Draft 9 -17 -2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING THE R -1, SINGLE- DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT, AND R -2, DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING COVERAGE, SETBACK, HEIGHT & GENERAL REGULATIONS The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 6. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11). Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX Front Side Interior Side Yard Rear Street Street Yard 2. Single dwelling The required interior unit buildings on lots 30' ** 15' yard setback of 5 feet 25' more than 60 feet in shall increase by 1/3 width, but less than foot (4 inches) for each 75 feet in width. foot that the lot width exceeds 60 feet.' OR shall meet the table in #5 below. * ** 4. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings: rages, mss, gFeeR Buses and 9aFden houses W 415! 5' h. egress window, NA NA NA wells. *Egress window wells may encroach in the side yard setback on one side. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX 5. Other Uses: * ** Single dwelling unit buildings on lots more than 60 feet in width, but less than 75 feet in width: 'Lot Width' Required Interior, ;Side Yard Setback 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side' 73 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side, 72 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side' j7 11 119'4" with no less than 9 feet on one side;,. 70 118'8" with no less than 9 feet on one side, 69' 118' with no less than 9 feet on one side' 68' 117'4" with no less than 8 feet on one side' 6J7 .116'8" with no less than 8 feet on one side' 66' 116' with no less than 8 feet on one side; 65 115'4" with no less than 7 feet on one side 64� 114'8" with no less than 7 feet on one side, 63' 114' with no less than 7 feet on one side 62 113'4" with no less than 6 feet on one side; 61 : 112' 8 " total with no less than 6 feet on one side If this option is utilized for the required interior side yard setback, Subdivision 7.A.3. shall not apply. C. Height Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX 1. Single dwelling units buildings and structures accessory thereto. 2. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings, but not attached thereto. 3. All other buildings and structures 21/2 stories. of 30 feet is lode. f ��ihinhever r maximum height see .below. .F- 1 '/2 stories or 18 feet whichever is less 3 stories or 40 feet whichever is less 4. The maximum height to the highest point on a roof -of a single or double dwelling 'unit shall be 35 ;3Q feet. For lots that exceed 75 feet in width, the maximum height to the ridge line shall be 35 feet, and the maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width. In. no event shall the maximum height exceed 40`sfeet. Section 2. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 7.A. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. Sidewall Articulation for a Principal Structure. In order to avoid the' monotonous appearance of long, unbroken building facades from abutting properties, the length of an exterior side wall shall not ex—c( thirty (30) feet without.a) a minimum of at least a one (1) foot deep t t en (10) foot wide offset (projecting or. recessed) or b) a combina o of two (2) of the following architectural or utilitarian features every, ti hirty_(30) feet: 1. Structural windows, awnings or canot 2. Projecting bay or box windows. -3. Stoops 4. Porches: 5. Chimneys (minimum depth of one (1) 6. Balconies 7. Pilasters Existing text - XXXX 3 Stricken text -fix. Added text - XXXX 8. Second story roof overhang_(at least twenty-percent (20 %) of the fagade length) 9. Port- cocheres (a roofed structure extending from the building' over an adjacent driveway that vehicles drive through, typical sheltering those ose getting out of vehicles or as a passageway tc a garage), Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2014. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please" publish in the. Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF "CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its. Regular Meeting of , 2013, and, as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 12013. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX 4 Stricken text — iEXXX Added text — XXXX R' To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #s; VIII.B. From: ` Cary Teague, Community Development Director Arption ' ❑x 11311�CUssi06 [� Date: August 5, 2013 Infgrnl4iion Subject: Second Reading — Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding the R- I & R -2, Zoning District requirements for Building Coverage, Setback, Height and General Regulations; Ordinance No. 2013 — 7. Action Requested: Adopt the attached Ordinance amending Section 850.04; with consideration given to the attached statement and recommendation from the Planning Commission. 1 Information /Bacicground: The following is a summary of the changes recommended by the City Council in each of the nine issues categories: 1. Drainage, retaining walls, egress windows and site access. (Approved as written; with the exception that the setback for egress windows was reduced from 5 to 3 feet.) 2. Building Lot Coverage. (No changes to the .existing OrdMdfice.) 3. Side yard setback including second story setback requirement. (Tool. out the side yard setback increase for lots under 75 feet in width; approved the three -foot maintenance access; approved the elimination of the second story setback requirement; and approved the elimination of the five foot setback allowance for an attached garage.) 4. Building Height. (Approved as written — Height reduced from 35 to 30 feet to ridge line for lots 75 feet in width or less.) S. Side wall articulation. (Approved as written.) City'd Edina • 4801 W. SO St. • Edina, MN 55424 r :6. Front facing garage. (Eliminated the regulations on front facing garages. The Council did however ;. request additional information on nine -foot tall garage doors.) A standard garage door height is ' typically eight feet height. The framing around it can vary in width. The nine -foot standard is typically used to prevent a taller garage door to house an RV, which is typically 12 -14 feet in height. 7. Nonconforming front yard'setbacks. (Eliminated the proposed language.) 8. Garage stall.requirements (Eliminated the allowance of a one -stall garage.) 9. Miscellaneous Code Revision "clean up." (Approved as written. The flood plain regulations require MR approval and therefore were removed.) Based on the direction,of the City Council at first reading, staff drafted the attached Ordinance No. 2013 -7(a) for consideration. With respect to the attached statement from the Planning Commission, staff drafted a second Ordinance`No. 2013 -7(b) that includes the recommendation from the Planning Commission in regard to side yard setbacks. Ifthe Council is in agreement with the Planning Commission version of the Ordinance, the Council is asked to choose between the alternative language that is listed on Pages 9 -10. Staff agrees with the Planning Commission in that the alternative side yard setback requirement of 25% of the lot width would bring greater simplicity and clarity than the sliding scale. (Page 10.) ,Please note that there are two different effective dates for certain provisions within the Ordinance. Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Ordinance would take effect immediately. It would put in place the regulations regarding site issues, including maintenance access, grading., drainage, and retaining walls. It also relocates the.building coverage requirements into one location in the Code and eliminates the accessory buildings used for dwelling purpose language. - Sections 5, 6 and 7, relating to building structure requirements would take effect January 1, 2014. By delaying to the first of the year, it would allow those that are in the process of designing homes plenty of time to finish their designs, and still begin construction this year. It would also allow plenty of time for builders and architects building in Edina, to inform their clients of the new regulations and when they will take effect. Building typically slows down after the holidays, and therefore., the ordinance should not take people by surprise. New building.in 2014 would then all be required to meet the new Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: • Statement /Recommendation from the Planning Commission. • Email correspondence from Jennifer Janovy. (Provides a table that shows a side ya.rd setback comparison of.the existing Ordinance and proposed Planning Commission setbacks.) • Draft Ordinances dated 8 -5 -13 as recommended by the City Council. CIIT�i OF ED11A MEMO City Hall • Phone 952- 927 -8861 4,91NA-.{� Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com p�J -e ,rte" Date:' August 5, 2013 To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment — Statement from the Planning Commission At its July 24 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the Council's July 16 actions on its recommend revisions to the Zoning Code and asked that the following statement be forwarded to the Council for its consideration as it conducts a second reading on the ordinance revisions: "We appreciate the Council's thoughtful review of our proposed zoning code amendments at its July 16 meeting. As we considered the results of that review, we wanted to make sure that you understood our intent with respect to the recommendations we made regarding building height and setbacks. Specifically, our recommendations regarding building height, second story setbacks, and side yard setbacks, were intended to work together to address concerns we heard during our process about the mass of new or remodeled structures on smaller lots. In our view, all three changes were necessary to temper the impact of new structures on neighboring properties while also permitting a larger range of design options. Although your initial decision to adopt only the height and second story setback, elements of this recommendation may not make a difference in the total square footage of a new or remodeled structure, it will permit such structures to be built closer (at least on one side) to adjacent properties than what we recommended. In the course of our process we concluded that creating some additional space between structures on small lots was an important goal and, accordingly, want to be sure you intend not to pursue that goal. If you want to pursue this goal, you should know that we are not wedded to any particular mechanics for accomplishing it. In fact, a provision that side yard setbacks on lots narrower than 75 feet be at least a total`of 25% of the lot width (with a minimum setback no less than what currently exists) might bring greater simplicity and clarity than the sliding scale we originally proposed while still achieving the policy objective we sought." City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO o e The following highlights the Previous Proposal vs. the Planning Commissions alternative suggestion regarding side yard setbacks. The table on the following page highlights the specific comparisons to the existing City Code: Previous Proposal: 6. Interior Side Yard Setbacks for lots 60 -74 feet in width shall be as follows: Lot Width Required Interior Side Yard Setback 74 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 73 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 72 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 71 19'4" with no less than 9 feet on one side 70 18'8" with no less than 9 feet on one side 69 18' with no less than 9 feet on one side 68 17'4" with no less than 8 feet on one side 67 16'8" with no less than 8 feet on one side 66 16' with no less than 8 feet on one side 65 15'4" with no less than 7 feet on one side 64 14'8" with no less than 7 feet on one side 63 -14' with no less than 7 feet on one side 62 13'4" with no less than 6 feet on one side 61 12' 8 " total with no less than 6 feet on one side Alternative: 6. Interior Side Yard Setbacks for lots greater than 49 feet, but less than 74 feet in width, the side yard setback shall be at least a total of 25% "of the lot width with a minimum setback. no less than the current side yard setbacks. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Interior Side Yard Setbacks Comparison Lot Width Current Interior Side Yard Setbacks PC Proposed Interior Side Yard Setbacks Simplified Setbacks -25% of lot width Under 50' 10' same same 50' 10' 12' 12' 6" . 51' 10' 12' 12' 9" 52' 10' 12' 13' 53' 10' 12' 13' 3" 54' 10' 12' 13' 6" 55' 10' 12' 13' 9' 56' 10' 12' 14' 57' 10' 12' 14' 3" 58' 10' 12' 14': 6" 59' 10' 12' 14' 9" 60' 10' 12' 15' 61' 10' 8" 121811 151311 62' 11' 4" 131411 15' 6" 63' 12' 14' 15' 9" 64' 12181.1 14' 8" '16' 65' 13' 4' 151411 16'. -3" _ - - 66' 14' 16' 16' 6" 67' 14' 8" 16' 8" 16' 9" 68' 15'4" 17' 4" 17' 69' 16' 18' 17' 3" 70' 161411 18' 4" 17' 6" 71' 17' 19, 17, 9„ . 72' 17' 8" 19' 8" 18' .73' . 18141/ 20, 181311 74' 19' 20' 18,: 6„ 75' and up 20' 20' same NOTES a Current interior, side yard setbacks are 5' on each side for lots under 60' wide. The setback then increases by 4" for each additional foot of lot width, up to 75'. Setbacks for lots 75' and wider are 10' each side. a PC proposed interior side yard setbacks add 2' to current setbacks. o The simplified setback is 25% of lot width. Simplified Setback: - o Applies to lots 50' – 75' wide only. 35 Current R -1 Zoning TOTAL ALLOW. 6468 s.f. 30 20- 10- I - --------------------------------- p---------------------------------- — r,`S 3. t Level 2250 s.f. Level 1 2250 s.f. TOTAL ALLOW. 6750 s.f. Proposed R -1 Zoning based on City Council First Reading July 16, 2013 30 50' I m I i Max. lot coverage 50' x 150' =7500 s.f. 7500 s.f. x'90 = 2250 s.f. TOTAL ALLOW. 6750 s.f. Proposed R -1 Zoning based on Planning Commission recommendation of April 24, 2013 Cary Teague From: Jennifer <rjmeyovy @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 7:28 PM To: Cary Teague; Kris Aaker Cc: James Hovland Subject: Simplified interior side yard setbacks Attachments: Interior Side Yard Setbacks -- Comparison.doc Cary and Kris, I shared the following with Kevin Staunton and he suggested I send it to you. As you know, the Planning Commission voted to forward to the City Council a clarification of their recommendations regarding interior side yard setbacks, building height, and elimination of the second story setback requirement. My understanding is this clarification will also include some discussion of setting interior side yard setbacks at 25% of lot width. I like this idea for a couple of reasons. First, it's simple and fair. It provides a simple way to calculate interior side yard setbacks and applies the same standard to all lots 50' - 75'. Second, for those who are concerned about increasing interior side yard setbacks, it does not increase setbacks on lots less than 50' wide or more than 75' wide. In fact, for lots 73' - 74' wide the simplified setback is actually less than the current setback. For lots 68'- 7.5' wide, the simplified setback is actually less than what the Planning Commission proposed. In this way, the simplified setback is also a compromise. Attached are some tables and further explanation. The larger table compares interior side yard setbacks: current, Planning Commission recommendation, and simplified (25% of lot width). The second table shows the simplified interior side yard setback only. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you for your continued efforts on this topic. Sincerely, Jennifer Janovy Interior Side Yard Setbacks Comparison Lot Width Current Interior Side.Yard Setbacks PC Proposed Interior Side Yard Setbacks Simplified Setbacks -25% of lot width Under 50' 10' same same 50' 10' 12' 121611 53' . _. _ _ 10' - - - 12'- -12' 9" 52' 10' 12' 13', 53' 10' 12' 13' 3" 54' 10' 12' 13' 6" 55' 10' 12' 13),911 56' 10' 12' 14' 57' 10' 12' 141311 58' 10' 12' 14' 6" 59' 10' 12' 14' 9" 60' 10' 12' 15' 61' 10' 8" 12' 8" 15' 3" 62' 11' 4" 13' 4" 15' 6" 63' 12' 14' 1-51911 64' 12' 8" 14' 8" 16' 65' 13' 4' 15' 4" 16' 3" 66' 14' 16' 16' 6" 67' 14' 8" 161811 16' 9" 68' 15' 4" 17' 4" 17' 69' 16' 18' 17' 3" 70' 16' 4" 18' 4" 17' 6" 71' 17' 19' 17, g„ 72' 171811 19' 8" 18' 73' 181411 20, 18131/ 74' 19' 20' 18' 6" 75' and up 20' 20' same NOTES 6 Current- interior side yard setbacks are 5' on each side for lots under 60' wide. The setback then increases by 4" for each additional foot of lot width, up to 75'. Setbacks for lots 75' and wider are 10' each side. a PC proposed interior side yard setbacks add 2' to current setbacks. o The simplified setback is 25% of lot width. Simplified Setback: a . Applies to lots 50'-75' wide only. • Simple calculation that applies the same setback standard to all lots 50'— 75' wide. • No change proposed to setbacks on lots less than 50' wide (remains 5' on each side). • No change proposed to setbacks on lots 75' and up (remains 10' on each side). • In two cases (lots 73' and 74' wide) simplified setback is less than current setback (by 1 inch and 6 inches respectively) o On lots 68'— 75' wide, simplified setback is less than PC proposed setbacks. Lot width Setback Standard Note Under 50' S' each side 50'— 75' Total setback is 25% of lot width. Setback on each side is % total setback 75' and up 10' each side Draft 8 -5 -2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -7(a) AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT, AND R -2, DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING COVERAGE, .SETBACK, HEIGHT & GENERAL REGULATIONS The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850.03. Subd. 3. Definitions is hereby amended as follows: Building Height or Structure Height. (Commercial, Industrial and High Density Residential)The distance measured from the average existing ground elevation adjoining the building at the front building line to the top of the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch -type roof, or to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. References in this Section to building height shall include and mean structure height, and if the structure is other than a building, the height shall be measured from said average existing ground elevation to the highest point of the structure. "Existing ground elevation" means the lowest of the following elevations: (1) the grade approved at the time of the subdivision creating the lot, (2) the grade at the time the last demolition permit. was issued for a principal structure that was on the lot, (3) the grade at the time the building permit for a principal structure on the lot is applied for. luilding Height or Structure Height. (Single & Two Dwelling Unit luildings)The distance measured from the average existing ground levation adjoining the building at the front building line to the highest point n a roof. References in this Section to building height shall include and7_ lean structure height, and if the structure is other than a building, the heigh hall be measured from said average existing ground elevation to the higher oint of the structure. "Existing ground elevation" means the lowest of theI Aowing elevations: (1) the grade approved at the time of the subdivision reating the lot, (2) the grade at the time the last demolition permit was .sued for a principal structure that was on the lot, (3) the grade at the ti e ie building-permit for a principal structure on the lot is applied for. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX lesidential Maintenance Access. For a single and double dwelling unit, lear flat walkway from a. front yard to a rear yard. This area allows outsidE edestrian access and space to bring equipment from a front yard to.a rea and without anv encroachment on neighboring property. Section 2. Subsection 850.07. Subd. 7. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7. Drainage, Retaining Walls & Site Access. Drainage. �FspeFties. No person shall obstruct or divert the natural flow of runoff so as to harm the public health, safety or general welfare. Surface water runoff shall be properly ^h ed lconveyed into storm sewers, watercourses, ponding areas or other public facilities. As part of the building permit, the applicant must submit a I and erosion control plan along with a stormwater" management plan that is signed by a licensed professional engineer. The - stormwater management plan must detail how stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainage system. The plans must be approved by the city engineer and'; the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans. All nroyi inn f6r drainage innlL ding storm sewerc_shooi d Fainage and wales shall be reviewed and apprnttoi-l- by the enginee, nrieF to dens +n us+ien ar installation. 2. Retaining Walls. All retaining walls must be shown on a grading; plan as part of a building permit application. Plans musts r demonstrate materials to be used for the retaining wall I Retaining walls taller than four (4) feet must meet three (3) foot setback. 3. Site Access. In an R -1 or R =2 Zoning District, a residential `maintenance access of at least three (3) feet in width is required I one side of a single or two dwelling unit from the front yard to, the rear yard. Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text — XXXX r—� Added text —XXXX Section 3. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 6. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. 1. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. On lots with an existing conditional use, if the combined.total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, is 1,000 square feet or greater, a conditional use permit is required. 2. Lots Less, Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. 47 Building Coverage shall include all principal or access buildings, including, but not limited tof a. Decks and patios. The first 150 square feet of an unenclosed deck or patio shall not be included when computing building, coverage. b. Gazebos c. Balconies., d. Breezeways. b. Porches. Accessory recreational facilities constructed above grade, such as paddle tennis courts. he following improvements shall be excluded when computing building coverage Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text — XXXX ' Added text —XXXX a. Driveways and sidewalks, but not patios, subject to 3. above. b. Parking lots and parking ramps. Accessory recreational facilities not enclosed by solid wall land not covered by a roof, including outdoor swimmin pools, tennis courts and shuffleboard courts. but fvclr,araGilitie Delhi ro nnnstru ed h rani uGh „ �c- Ii- �„c��- a�eve- g�ae�- as -paddf Unenclosed and uncovered ste square feetj Overhanging eaves and roof posts or pillarsf and stoops less than 5 ections not supported Section 4. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 7.A. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following'-special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. 1 , , , gaMges), is used OF iRtended for use, in whole eF in paFt, for Fesidential eqGUp�anGy, .suE3h aGGessery hl �ilydini-1 nr o�rl ln�l lro LI Jll N�•lCl lL. or such addition nr�r� i n, Sal . GGMPIY with all of the rvinimllm sett Gk fn-r a single dwelling unit b ailding. . B. One Dwelling Unit Per Single Dwelling Unit Lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall be erected, placed or used on any lot unless the lot is subdivided into two or more lots pursuant to Section 810 of this Code. 850.07, Existing text — XXXX 4 Stricken text - XXXX Added text —XXXX C. Basements. All single dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed with a basement having 'a gross floor area equal to at least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above. The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for purposes of this paragraph. D. Minimum Building Width. No more than 30 percent of the length, in the aggregate, of a single dwelling unit building shall measure less than 18 feet in width as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls. E. Parking Ramps Prohibited. No parking ramp shall be constructed in the R 1 District. F. Temporary retail sales of evergreen products from Conditional Use properties 1. The Manager may grant a permit for temporary retail sales of evergreen product's, if: a. the owner of the property or other non - profit group approved by the owner conducts the sale. b. the duration of the.sale does not exceed 45 consecutive days and does not start before November 15 in any year. c. the sale area is located in a suitable off - street location that does not interfere with traffic circulation on the site or obstruct parking spaces needed by the principal use on the site. d. the sale area is not located within 200 feet of a property zoned and used for residential occupancy. - e. the hours of operation do not extend beyond 10:00.p.m. f. signage is limited to one sign per street frontage with an aggregate sign area not exceeding 100 square feet: G. Additions to or replacement of, single dwelling: unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units. For additions, alterations and changes to, or rebuilds of existing single dwelling unit buildings and buildings. containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split Existing text — XXXX 5 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX level dwelling is torn down and a new home.is built, the new first floor or entry level elevation may not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the home that was torn down. Subject to Section 850.11 Subd. 2. I. the first floor elevation may be increased more than one (1) foot. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply to all single dwelling unit_ buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units including units in the flood plain overlay district. Any deviation from the requirements of this paragraph shall require a variance. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Section 5. Subsection 850.11. Subd. G. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11)._ Front Street Side InteriorSide Rear Street Yard Yard 5. Buildings and structures accessory.to single dwelling unit buildings- b. ttaGhed -30! 4-5- rte' 2-& sheds, ga, garden hn g. all other 30' 15' 5' accessory buildings and structures. h. egress window N N U wells. ''Egress window wells am y encroach in the side yard setback, on one side. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —X X 5'" NA 7 C. Height 1. Single dwelling units buildings and structures accessory thereto. 2. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings, but not attached thereto. 3. All other buildings and structures 2'/2 stories. ^" wee h wEAe er is lees for, Ie i maximum height see #4 below. 1 '/ stories or 18 feet whichever is less 3 stories or 40 feet whichever is less 4. The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a single or double dwelling unit shall be 35 ;30, feet. For lots that exceed 75 feet in width, the maximum height to the ridge line shall be 35 feet, and the maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width:. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet. Section 6. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 7.A. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. ln,addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following.speeial requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. feef: 3.4 -Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length. or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no Existing text - XXXX 8 Stricken text -X r—, Added text - XXXX P.-LMALM11AUZ. cc Z - - - feef: 3.4 -Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length. or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no Existing text - XXXX 8 Stricken text -X r—, Added text - XXXX rear lot line, then for setback purposes the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the.front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. 4. Rear Yard Setback Corner Lots Required to Maintain Two Front Street Setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to 'a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. 5. Through Lots. For a through lot, the required setback for all buildings. and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. 5idewall Articulation for a Principal Structure. In order to avoid the' I appearance of long, unbroken building facades fromL abutting properties, the length of an exterior side wall shall not exceed! thirty (30) feet without a) a minimum of at least a one -(1) foot deep by ten (10) foot wide offset (projecting or recessed) or b) a combination! oftwo (2) of the following architectural or utilitarian features every of (30) feet: 1. Structural windows, awnings or canopies 2. Projecting bay or box windows. — 3. Stoops 4. Porches 15. Chimneys (minimum depth of one (1) foot) 6. Balconies IT . Pilastersr 8 Second story roof overhang_(at least twenty_pgrcent (20 %) of the fagade length),— - 9. Port- cocheres (a roofed structure extending from the building �---Iover an adjacent driveway that vehicles drive through, typical Existing text — XXXX .9 Stricken text — XXXX Added text- XXXX sheltering those getting out of vehicles or as a passageway to a garage), Section 7. Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this Ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Sections 5 and 6 of this Ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2014. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send.two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the uhdersigned.duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting.of , 2013, and as recorded.in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX 10 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Draft 8 -5 -2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -7(b) AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT, AND R -2, DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING COVERAGE, SETBACK, HEIGHT & GENERAL REGULATIONS The City Council Of. Edina Ordains: Section 1. - Subsection 850.03. Subd. 3. Definitions is hereby amended as follows: Building Height or Structure Height. (Commercial, Industrial and High Density Residential)The distance measured from the average existing ground elevation adjoining the building at the front building line to the top of the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch -type roof; or to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. References in this Section to building height shall include and mean structure height, and if the structure is other than a building, the height shall be measured from said average existing ground elevation to the highest point of the structure. "Existing ground elevation" means the lowest of the following elevations: (1) the grade approved at the time of the subdivision creating the lot, (2) the grade at the time the last . demolition permit was issued for a principal structure that was on the lot, (3) the grade at the time the building permit for a principal structure on the lot is applied for. Building Height or Structure Height. (Single & Two Dwelling Unit Buildings)The distance measured from the average existing ground' elevation adjoining the building at the front building line to the highest point ion a roof. References in this .Section to building height shall include and, mean structure height, and if the structure is other than a building, the height, shall be measured from said average existing ground elevation to the highes I of the structure. "Existing ground elevation" means the lowest of the7 following elevations: (1) the grade approved at the time of the subdivision' creating the lot, (2) the grade at the time the last demolition permit wasr issued for a principal structure that was on the lot, (3) the grade at the time the building permit for a principal structure on the lot is applied for.(� Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX r—, Added text —XXXX ,sidential Maintenance Access. For a single and double dwelling unit, gar flat walkway from a front yard to a rear yard. This area allows outsidE destrian access and space to bring equipment from a front yard to a rea rd without anv encroachment on neighboring property-.7— Section 2. Subsection 850.07. Subd. 7. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7. Drainage, Retaining Walls & Site Access. 11. I No person shall obstruct or divert the natural flow of[ 'runoff so as to harm the public health, safety or general welfare Surface water runoff shall be properly Ghanneled'conveyed into storm sewers, watercourses, pon ding areas or other public_ facilities. As part of the building permit, the applicant must submit a grading and erosion control plan along with a stormwater' management plan that is signed by a licensed professional I The stormwater management plan must detail h stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent, property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainagE system. The plans must be approved by the city engineer and the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans. 2. Retaining Walls. All retaining walls must be shown on a grading, —'plan as part of a building permit application. Plans musty 'demonstrate materials to be used for the retaining wall construction. Retaining walls taller than four (4) feet must teem a: three (3) foot setback. 3.----.,Site Access. In an R -1 or R -2 Zoning District, a residential maintenance access of at least three (3) feet in width is required on one side of a single or two dwelling unit from the front yard to the rear yard. Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Section 3. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 6. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. 1. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. On lots with an existing conditional use, if the combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, is 1,000 square feet or greater, a conditional use permit is required. 2; Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all buildings and structures, provided, however, that the area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. r4-1 Building Coverage shall include all principal or accessory buildings, including, but not limited to a. Decks and patios. The first 150 square feet of an unenclos deck or patio shall not be included when computing buildi b. Gazebos c. Balconies. d. Breezeways. e. Porches. f. Accessory recreational facilities constructed above grade, such as paddle tennis courts. he following improvements shall be excluded when computing building coverage: Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Driveways and sidewalks, but not patios, subject to 3.a above. b. Parking lots 'and parking ramps. c. Accessory recreational facilities not enclosed by solid wall --wand not covered by a roof, including outdoor swimmin pools, tennis courts and shuffleboard courts. r„ ++ , hiGh aFe E;eRStFUGted bv- grade,- SUGh -as —page ±«;T;; H.Unenclosed and uncovered steps and stoops less than 50 square feet. e. Overhanging eaves and roof projections not supported by posts or pillars. Section 4. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 7:A. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. _ A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. (' I GGe onry Buildinnc§ and Stn"Inti Fes Used fer__Dwelling PUIFpgses. SubjeGt +n the FequiroPnents ef Faryragh B. of SuW --7 a thi?. 850.11, if any aGGesseFy building OF StFUGt (iRGluding, Wiihei t IitatFpq� pes\' er if ah ndgjifien fr- ()r e�Wane inn `nf (iREAYdinr, witho �t limitation an additional stnnr on\ viucnrrc�, �vrcrrara -rnrrrrccR�v,1r'i,, ,�cc�r,� - cccrarrrorrur:rrvr.�°-rTl 'aan a.GGeJSJ frcFU.Gc' Ar�GY�mg�vT "ut li�irniit6tivrn, garages ' is d "im fr see in who! �ic j � � feF residential OGGupanGy, +hen SUGh�cJ building r of r Te OF UGh' addition expansion, shallE;ernply yyifh all of the- minima ern sethaGk requirements fee a single ,dwelling Unit building. B:. One Dwelling Unit Per Single Dwelling Unit Lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall be erected, placed or used. on any lot unless the lot is subdivided into two or more lots pursuant to Section 810 of this Code. G. De..i..'7ks and Patios. Notwithstanding the PFE)viSions of Subsection 950.07-; Existing text — XXXX 4 Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX C. Basements. All single dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed with a basement having a gross floor area equal to at least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above. The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for purposes of this paragraph. D. Minimum Building Width. No more than 30 percent of the length, in the aggregate, of a single dwelling unit building shall measure less than 18 feet in width as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls. E. , Parking Ramps Prohibited. No parking ramp shall be constructed in the .R 1 District. F. Temporary retail sales of evergreen products from Conditional. Use properties 1. The Manager may grant a permit for temporary retail sales of evergreen products, if: a. the owner of the .property or other non - profit group approved by the owner conducts the sale. b. the duration of the sale does not exceed 45 consecutive days and does not start before November 15 in any year. C. the sale area is located in a suitable off- street location that does not interfere with traffic circulation on the site or Obstruct parking spaces needed by the principal use on the site. d. the sale area is not located within 200 feet of a property zoned and used for residential occupancy. e. the hours of operation do not extend beyond 10:00 p.m. f. signage is limited to one sign per street frontage with an aggregate sign area not exceeding 100 square feet. G. Additions to or replacement of, single dwelling.unit buildings and buildings containing two. dwelling. units. For additions, alterations and changes to, or rebuilds of existing single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be. more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split Existing text — XXXX 5 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX I evel dwelling is torn down and a new home is built, the new first floor or entry level elevation may not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the home that was torn down. Subject to Section 850.11 Subd. 2. I. the first floor elevation may be increased more than one (1) foot. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply to all single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units including units in the flood plain overlay district. Any deviation from the requirements of this paragraph shall require a variance. J 6 Section 5. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 6. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11). Front Street Side InteriorSide Rear Street Yard Yard 5. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings: garages too! S greeRheuses ar4 garde hnneoo g. all other 30' 15' 5' 5' accessory buildings and structures. h. egress wind NA NA U N wells. 'Egress window wells may, encroach in the side yard setback Lon side. Existing text — XXXX 7 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX C. Height 1. Single dwelling units buildings and structures accessory thereto. 2. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings, but not attached thereto. 3. All other buildings and structures 2 Y2 stories. er 30 fees whirheyeo is Bess for maximum height see #4 below. 1 Y2 stories or 18 feet whichever is less 3 stories or 40 feet whichever is less 4. The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a single or double dwelling unit shall be 35 30 feet. For lots that exceed 75 feet in width, the maximum height to the ridge line shall be 35 feet, and the maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet. Section 6. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 7.A. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. f$9� 3.4 -Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 Existing text — XXXX 8 Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX A. n Mal" - - LI C. - f$9� 3.4 -Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 Existing text — XXXX 8 Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX feet in length or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then for setback purposes the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. 4. Rear Yard Setback - Corner Lots Required to Maintain Two Front Street Setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be . a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. 5. Through Lots. For a through lot, the required setback * for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. 6. Interior Side Yard Setbacks for lots 60 -74 feet in width shall be as follows: Lot Width Required Interior Side Yard .Setback 74 20' With no less than 10 feet on one side 73 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 72 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 71 19'4" with no'less than 9 feet on one side 70 18'8" with no less than 9 feet on one side 69 18' with no less than 9 feet on .one side 9 68 17'4" with no less than 8 feet on one side 67 16'8" with no less than 8 feet on one. side 66 16' with no less than 8 feet on one side 65 164" with no less than 7 feet on one side 64 14'8" with no less than 7 feet on one side 63 14' with no less than 7 feet on one side 62 13'4" with no less than 6 feet on one side 61 12' 8 " total with no less than 6 feet on one side OR 6.. Interior Side Yard Setbacks for lots greater than 49 feet, but, less than 74 feet in width, the side yard setback shall be at least a total of 25% of the lot width with -a minimum setback no less than the current side yard setbacks. H�Sidewall Articulation for Principal Structure. In order to avoid the monotonous appearance of long, unbroken building facades from abutting properties, the length of an exterior side wall shall not exceed thirty (30) feet without a) a minimum of at least a one (1) foot deep by ten (10) foot wide offset (projecting or recessed) or b) a combination) iof two (2) of the following architectural or utilitarian features every thirty (30) feet: 1. Structural windows, awnings or canopies 2. Projecting bay or box windows. 3. Stoops 4. Porches 5. Chimneys (minimum depth of one (1) foot) 6. Balconiesr �7. Pilasters,, 8. Second story roof overhang (at least twenty_percent (20 %) of the fagade length)— 9. Port- cocheres (a roofed structure extending from the building ��over an adjacent driveway that vehicles drive through, typically Existing text — XXXX 10 Stricken text — XGXX Added text - xxxx eltering those getting out of vehicles or as a passa iaraaO Section 7. Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this Ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Sections 5, and 6 of this Ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2014. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mang en, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of )2013. Existing text — XXXX 1.1 Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #:., VIII.B. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Discussion ❑ Date: August 5, 2013 pnforimatlon LJ Subject: Second Reading — Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding the R- I & R -21 Zoning District requirements for Building Coverage, Setback, Height and General Regulations; Ordinance No. 2013 — 7. Action Requested: Adopt the attached Ordinance amending Section 850.04; with consideration given to the attached statement and recommendation from the Planning Commission. Information /Background: The following is a summary of the changes recommended by the City Council in each of the nine issues categories: 1. Drainage, retaining walls, egress windows and site access. (Approved as written; with the exception that the setback. for egress windows was reduced from 5 to 3 feet.) 2. Building Lot Coverage. (No changes to the .existing Oi ftahce.) 3. Side yard setback. including second story setback requirement. (Took out the side yard setback increase for lots under 75 feet in width; approved the three -foot maintenance access; approved the elimination of the second story setback requirement; and approved the elimination of the five foot setback allowance for an attached garage.) 4. Building Height. (Approved as written — Height reduced .from 35 to 30 feet to ridge line for lots 75 feet in width or less.) 5. Side wall articulation. (Approved as written.) M City'd Edina • 4801 W. 50t' St. • Edina, MN 55424 ;6. Front facing garage. (Eliminated the regulations on front facing garages. The Council did however =j request additional information on nine -foot tall garage doors.) A standard garage door height is ' typically eight feet height. The framing around it can vary in width. The nine -foot standard is typically used to prevent a taller garage door to house an RV, which is typically 12 -14 feet in height. 7. Nonconforming front yard 'setbacks. (Eliminated the proposed language.) 8. Garage stall,requirements (Eliminated the allowance of a one -stall garage.) 9. Miscellaneous Code Revision "clean up." (Approved as written. The flood plain regulations require DNR approval and therefore were removed.) Based on the direction,of the City Council at first reading, staff drafted the attached Ordinance No. 2013 -7(a) for consideration. With respect to the attached statement from the Planning Commission, staff drafted a second Ordinance'No. 2013 -7(b) that includes the recommendation from the Planning Commission in regard to side yard setbacks. If the Council is in agreement with the Planning Commission version of the Ordinance, the Council is asked to choose between the alternative language that is listed on Pages 9 -10. Staff agrees with the Planning Commission in that the alternative side yard setback requirement of 25% of the lot width would bring greater simplicity and clarity than the sliding scale. (Page 10.) Please note that there are two different effective dates for certain provisions within the Ordinance. Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Ordinance would take effect immediately. It would put in place the regulations regarding site issues, including maintenance access, grading, drainage, and retaining walls. It also relocates the building coverage requirements into one location in the Code and eliminates the accessory buildings used for dwelling purpose language. Sections 5, 6 and 1, relating to building structure requirements would take effect January 1, 2014. By delaying to the first of the year, it would allow those that are in the process of designing homes plenty of time to finish their designs, and still begin construction this year. It would also allow plenty of time for builders and architects building in Edina, to inform their clients of the new regulations and when they will take effect. Building typically slows down after the holidays, and therefore., the ordinance should not take people by surprise. New building in 2014 would then all be required to meet the new Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: • Statement /Recommendation from the Planning Commission. Email correspondence from Jennifer Janovy. (Provides a table that shows a side yard setback comparison of the existing Ordinance and proposed Planning Commission setbacks.) Draft Ordinances dated 8 -5 -13 as recommended by the City Council. c,a1J,s •'� ��[' ,• . �P•� say ` 'roi City Hall o Phone 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date:' August 5, 2013 To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director MEMO C' Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment — •Statement from the Planning Commissioh At its July 24 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the Council's July 16 actions on its recommend revisions to, the Zoning Code and asked that the following statement be forwarded to the Council fr its consideration as it conducts a second reading on the. ordinance revisions: "We appreciate the Council's thoughtful review of our proposed zoning code amendments at its July 16 meeting. As we considered the results of that review, we wanted to make sure that you understood our intent with respect to the recommendations we made regarding building height and.setbacks. Specifically, our recommendations regarding. building height, second story setbacks, and side yard setbacks, were intended to work together to address concerns we heard during our process about the mass of new or remodeled structures on smaller lots. In our view, all three changes were necessary to temper the impact 'of new structures on. neighboring properties while also permitting a larger range of design options. Although your initial decision to adopt only the height and second story setback elements of this recommendation may not make a difference in the total square footage of a new or remodeled structure, it will permit such structures to be built closer (at least on one side) to adjacent properties than what we recommended. In the course of our process we concluded that creating some additional space between structures on small lots was an important goal and, accordingly, want to be sure you intend not to pursue that goal. If you want to pursue this goal, you should know that we are not wedded to any particular mechanics for accomplishing it. In fact, a provision that side yard setbacks on lots narrower than 75 feet be at least a total of 25% of the lot width (with a minimum setback no less than what currently.exists) might bring greater simplicity and clarity than the sliding scale. we originally proposed while still achieving the policy objective we sought." City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 MEMO .1� o e� The following highlights the Previous Proposal vs. the Planning Commissions alternative suggestion regarding side yard setbacks. The table on the following page highlights the specific comparisons to the existing City Code: Previous Proposal: 6. Interior Side Yard Setbacks for lots 60 -74 feet in width shall be as follows: Lot Width Required Interior Side Yard Setback 74 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 73 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 72 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 71 19'4" with no less than 9 feet on one side 70 18'8" with no less than 9 feet on one, side 69 18' with no less than 9 feet on one side 68 17'4" with no less than 8 feet on one side 67 16'8" with no less than 8 feet on one side 66 16' with no less than 8 feet on one side 65 15'4" with no less than 7 feet on one side 64 14'8" with no less than 7 feet on one side 63 14' with no less than 7 feet on one side 62 13'4" with no less than 6 feet on one side 61 12' 8 " total with no Jess than 6 feet on one side Alternative: 6. Interior Side Yard Setbacks for lots greater than 49 feet, but less than 74 feet in width, the side yard setback shall be at least a total of 25% 'of the lot width with a minimum setback no less than the current side yard setbacks. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Interior Side Yard Setbacks Comparison Lot Width _ Current Interior Side Yard Setbacks PC Proposed Interior Side Yard Setbacks Simplified Setbacks -25% of lot width Under 50' 10' same same 50' 10' 12' 12' 6" 51' 10 12' 121911 52' 10' 12' 13' 53' 10' 12' 131311 54' 10' 12' 13' 6" 55' 10' 12' 131.9" 56' 10' 12' 14' 57' 10' 12' 14)3" 58' 10' 12' 14' 6" 59' 10' 12' 14' 9" 60' 10' 12' 15' 61' : 10' 8" 12' 8" 15' 3" 62' 11'4' 13' 4" 1516" 63' 12' 14, 151911 64' 12' g„ 14, 811, 16' 65' 13' 4' 15' 4" 16' 3" 66' .14' 16' 161611 67' 14' 8" 1618/1" 16'.9„ 68' 15' 4" 17' 4" 17' 69' 16' 18' 70' .161.411 18,411 17' "6" 71' 17' 19' 17' 9" 72' 17' 8" .191811 18, 73' 18' 4" .20' 181311 74' 19' 20' 18' 6" 75' and up 20' 20' same NOTES ® Current interior side yard setbacks are 5' on each side for lots under 60' wide. The setback then increases by 4" for each additional foot of lot width, up to 75'. Setbacks for lots 75' and wider are 10' each side. ® PC proposed interior side yard setbacks add 2' to current setbacks. ® The simplified setback is 25% of lot width. Simplified Setback: 0 Appi,ies to lots 50' — 75' wide only. 35 sn I I I I m i I . I I Max. lot coverage '.50'x150'= 7500s.f. 75g0 s.f. x,.30 = MO s.f. I s' bo' Y ,. I I I I I I I I ' I I I I j Site Plan Current R -1 Zoning TOTAL ALLOW. 6468 s.f. 30- 20- 10- 0- ITOTALALLOW. 6750 s.f. Proposed R -1 Zoning based on City Council First Reading July 16, 2013 30 20— 10—----------------------- -- - - - - -- 0 — ------------------------------- ------------------------------- A w•. 50' I I I I m j I I I I Max_ lot coverage 50' x 150' = 7500 s.f. 7500 s:f x.30 = 2250 s.f. I I �f 5' 38' 7' a " I I I I I I I I I I I I j Site Plan TOTAL ALLOW. 6750 s.f. Proposed R -1 Zoning based on Planning Commission recommendation of April 24, 2013 Cary Teague From: Jennifer <rjmeyovy @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 7:28 PM To: Cary Teague; Kris Aaker Cc: James Hovland Subject: Simplified interior side yard setbacks Attachments: Interior-Side Yard Setbacks -- Comparison.doc Cary and Kris, I shared the following with Kevin Staunton and he suggested I send it to you. As you know, the Planning Commission voted to forward to the City Council a clarification of their recommendations regarding interior side yard setbacks, building height, and elimination of the second story setback requirement. My understanding is this clarification will also include some discussion of setting interior side yard setbacks at 25% of lot width. I like this idea for a couple of reasons. First, it's simple and fair. It provides a simple way to calculate interior side yard setbacks and applies the same standard to all lots 50'- 75'. Second, for those who are concerned about increasing interior side yard setbacks, it does not increase setbacks on lots less than 50' wide or more than 75' wide. In fact, for lots 73'- 74' wide the simplified setback is actually less than the current setback. For lots 68'- 75' wide, the simplified setback is actually less than what the Planning Commission proposed. In this way, the simplified setback is also a compromise. Attached are some tables and further explanation. The larger table compares interior side yard setbacks: current, Planning Commission recommendation, and simplified (25% of lot width). The second table shows the simplified interior side yard setback only. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you for your continued efforts on this topic. Sincerely, Jennifer Janovy Interior Side Yard Setbacks Comparison Lot Width Current Interior Side Yard Setbacks. PC Proposed Interior Side Yard Setbacks Simplified Setbacks -25% of lot width Under 50' 10' same same 50' 10' 12' 12' 6" 51' 10' 12' 12' 9" 52' 10' 12' 13' 53' 10' 12' 13' 3" 54' 10' 12' 13' 6" 55' '10' 12' 13' 9" 56' 10' 12' 14' 57' 10' 12' 14' 3" 58' 10' 12' 14' 6" 59' 10' 12' 14' 9" 60' 10' 12' 15' 61' 10' 8" 12' 8" 15'3" 62'. 111411 13' 4" 15' 6" 63' 12' 14' 15' 9" 64'. 12' 8" 14' 8" 16' 65' 13' 4' 15' 4" 16' 3" 66' 14' 16' 16' 6" 67' 14' 8" 16' 8" 16. 9„ 68' 15'4" 17' 4:' 17' 69' 16' 18' 17' 3" 70': 16.4» 18, 4„ 17, . 6„ 71' 17' 19' 17' 9" 72' 17' 8" 19' 8" 18' 73' 18' 4" 20, 18' 3" 74' 19' 20' 18, 6„ 75' and :up 20' 20'. same. NOTES ® Current interior side yard setbacks are 5' on -each .side for lots under 60' wide. The setback then increases by 4" for each additional foot of lot width, up to.75'. Setbacks for lots 75' and wider are 10' each side. e PC proposed interior side yard setbacks add 2'to current setbacks. o The simplified setback is 25% of lot width. Simplified Setback: s Applies to lots 50' - 75' wide only. • Simple calculation that applies the same setback standard to all lots 50'— 75' wide. • No change proposed to setbacks on lots less than 50' wide (remains 5' on each side). • No change proposed to setbacks on lots 75' and up (remains 10' on each side). • In two cases (lots 73' and 74' wide) simplified setback is less than current setback (by 1 inch and 6 inches respectively) • On lots 68' — 75' wide, simplified setback is less than PC proposed setbacks. Lot width Setback Standard Note Under 50' .5 each side 50'— 75' Total setback is 25% of lot Width. Setback on each side is % total setback 75' and up 10' each side Draft 8 -5 -2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -7(a) AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT, AND R -2, DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING COVERAGE, SETBACK, . HEIGHT & GENERAL REGULATIONS The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850.03. Subd. 3. Definitions is hereby amended as follows: Building Height or Structure Height. (Commercial, Industrial and High Density Residential)The distance measured from the average existing ground elevation adjoining the building at the front building line to the top of the cornice of ,a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch -type roof, or to the average distance of the highest gable. on _a pitched or hip roof. References in this Section to building height shall include. and mean structure height, and if the structure is other than a building, the height shall be measured from said average existing ground elevation to the highest point of the structure. "Existing ground elevation" means the lowest of the..following elevations: (1) the grade approved at the time of the subdivision creating the lot, (2) the grade at the time the last demolition permit was issued for a principal structure that was on the lot, (3) the grade at the time the building permit for a principal structure on the lot is applied for. Building Height or Structure Height. (Single & Two Dweng Unit Buildings)The distance measured from the average existing ground I adjoining the building at the front building line to the highest point, ion a roof. References in this Section to building height shall include and[ mean structure height, and if the structure is other than a building, the heigh shall be measured from said average existing ground elevation to the higher ` point of the structure. "Existing ground elevation" means the lowest of the elevations: (1) the grade approved at the time of the subdivision creating the lot, (2) the grade at the time the last demolition permit was !J issued for a principal structure that was on the lot, (3) the grade at the ti the building permit for a principal structure on the lot is applied for.1 Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX ; esidential Maintenance Access. For a single and double dwelling unit, lear flat walkway from a front yard to a rear yard. This area allows outsid edestrian access and space to bring equipment from a front yard to.a rep and without any encroachment on neighboring_propertyJ— Section 2. Subsection 850.07. Subd. 7. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7. Drainage, Retaining Walls & Site Access. Drainage. OepeFties- No person shall obstruct or divert the natural flow of, runoff so as to harm the public health, safety or general welfare Surface water runoff shall be properly Ghann into storm sewers, watercourses, ponding areas or other public facilities. As part of the building permit, the applicant must submit a I and erosion control plan along with a stormwate L management plan that is signed by a licensed professional engineer. The e-stormwater management plan must detail how stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainagE system. The plans must be approved by the city engineer and the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans. All r�rniic in)m fnr'rl 6inage innln�rJirin `c +nr_er�_c6yer- '§heet rdr inage and syiales Sall be reyieyyb d And .�r�nrnmrd h�i the ..... .. .�., S- all �..�..�_ b _he Retaining Walls. All retaining walls must be shown on a grading plan as part of a building permit application. Plans musts demonstrate materials to be used for the retaining wall construction. Retaining walls taller than four (4) feet must meet three (3) foot setback. Site Access. In an R -1 or R -2 Zoning District, a residential` maintenance access of at least three (3) feet in width is req on one side of a single or two dwelling unit from the front y� the rear vardT Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text - XXXX Added text —XXXX Section 3. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 6. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. 1. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. On lots with an existing conditional use, if the combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, is 1,000 square feet or greater, a conditional use permit is required. 2. Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all buildings and structures_ , provided, however, that the area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXX-X Added text — XXXX uilding Coverage shall include all principal or accesso uildinas. including. but not limited to:F— a. Decks and patios. The first 150 square feet of an unenclosed' ��deck or patio shall not be included when computing building coverage. b. Gazebos c. Balconies. d. Breezeways. e. Porches. Accessory recreational facilities constructed above grade, such as paddle tennis courtsi The following improvements shall be excluded when computing building coverage 3 and sidewalks, but not patios, subiect to 3.a bove b. Parking lots and parking ramps. c.. Accessory recreational facilities not enclosed by solid wal land not covered by a roof, including outdoor swimmir pools, tennis courts and shuffleboard courts. but faGil 5 shallrtnlud d when nnmPNtiny- hr rilrlin� nn�ior��� d. Unenclosed and uncovered steps and stoops less than 5C square feet. 9. Overhanging eaves and roof projections not supported by posts or pillars. Section 4. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 7.A. is hereby amended'.as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. S bsebtien g50.1 cif any nry building er otr � wa�.TCCCrvrr— , y limitatian,. r er-.if,any addition �o of ling, expansl limitation, : an additional steFy on) an --c GGe sE)Fy -building p�S E�e /innlr ding without lirnitOtien r r gaFages), v r . 'resice4g� l enr N n0nnv , then s 'nh ar eessery - building e r stru ntu re OF r r additi'bh or n hall Gemply with all of th Eli— cracrrcrorr— v�ei%�a-rr��fB-I- �srrcrr�c minimr rrn seth T b k req rirements fer a single dwelling unit building. - B. One Dwelling Unit Per Single Dwelling Unit Lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall be erected, placed or used on any lot unless the lot is subdivided into two or more lots pursuant to Section 810 of this Code. �+ ht: nr*- and-Da fin tiding the provisions E)f S- ubsevti E)R 85G-. 7 �r'r..7"c7rta�7[ro'S�ibtVVtt1�� ``""�. �. �. 77 , Existing text - XXXX 4 Stricken text — XXXX r—� Added text —XXXX C. Basements. All single dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed with a basement having a gross floor area equal to at least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above. The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for purposes of this paragraph. D. Minimum Building Width. No more than 30 percent of the length, in the aggregate, of a single dwelling unit building shall. measure less than 18 feet in width as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls. E. Parking Ramps Prohibited. No parking ramp shall be constructed in the R 1 District. F. Temporary retail sales of evergreen products from Conditional Use properties 1. The Manager may grant a permit for temporary retail sales of evergreen products, if: a. the owner of the property or other non - profit group approved by the owner conducts the sale. b, the duration of the sale does not exceed 45 consecutive days and does not start before November 15 in any year. c. the sale area is located in a suitable off - street location that does not interfere with traffic circulation on the site or obstruct parking spaces needed by the principal use on the site. d. the sale area is not located within 200 feet of a property zoned and used for residential occupancy. e. the hours of operation do not extend. beyond 10:00 p.m. f.. signage is limited to one sign per street frontage with an aggregate sign area not exceeding 100 square feet. G. Additions to or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units: For additions, alterations and changes to, or rebuilds of existing single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split Existing text — XXXX 5 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX level dwelling is torn down and a new home.is built, the new first floor or entry level elevation may not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the home that was torn down. Subject to Section 850.11 Subd. 2. I. the first floor elevation may be increased more than one (1) foot. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply to all single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units including units in the flood plain overlay district. Any deviation from the requirements of this paragraph shall require a variance. Existing text — XXXX 6 Stricken text —XYD'X Added text —XX X Section 5. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 6. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11). Front Street Side InteriorSide Rear Street Yard Yard 5. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings; h -. -icv .. WI 4-5! rr gaF.Ig -sue eGI 'Sheds, gFeenhe see and- . gaFd en heroes g. all other 30' 15' 5' accessory buildings and structures. h. egress window, N NA Lj wells. *Egress. window wells may, encroach in the -side yard setback on one side. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXX X Added text —XXXX 5' NA 7 C. Height 1. Single dwelling units buildings and structures accessory thereto. 2. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings, but not attached thereto. 3. All other buildings and structures 2'/z stories. eo,feef Whinheve is 4e&s for maximum height see #4 below. 1 '/ stories or 18 feet whichever is less 3 stories or 40 feet whichever is less 4. The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a single or double dwelling unit shall be 35 30 feet. For lots that exceed 75 feet in width, the maximum height to the ridge line shall be 35 feet, and the maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet. Section 6. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 7.A. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. f89f: . 3.4 -Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX r- P.7- MCWTZ MWMMIMMMMW f89f: . 3.4 -Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX rear lot line, then for setback purposes the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. 4. Rear Yard Setback - Corner Lots Required to Maintain Two front Street Setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot.required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot.line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to 'a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. 5. Through Lots. For a through lot, the required setback for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. LH_Sidewall Articulation for a Principal Structure. In order to avoid they monotonous appearance of long, unbroken building facades from abutting properties, the length of an exterior side wall shall not exceed thirty (30) feet without a) a minimum of at least a one (1) foot deep by ten (10) foot wide offset (projecting or recessed) or b) a combination! of two (2) of the following architectural or utilitarian features every thirty _(30) feet: 1. Structural windows, awnings or canopies 2. Projecting bay or box windows.— �3. Stoops 4. Porches 5. Chimneys (minimum depth of one (1) foot) 6. Balconies I7. Pilasters: 8. Second story roof overhang_(at least twenty (20 %) of J he facade length)— .9 Port- cocheres (a roofed structure extending from the building over an adjacent driveway that vehicles drive through, typically =~ Existing text - XXXX 9 Stricken text — X(XX Added text = XXXX sheltering those getting out of vehicles or as a passageway to a garage) Section 7. Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this Ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Sections 5 and 6 of this Ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2014. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed an_ d acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX 10 Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX Draft 8 -5 -2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -7(b) AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING THE R -1, SINGLE - DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT, AND R -2, DOUBLE DWELLING. UNIT DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING COVERAGE, SETBACK, HEIGHT & GENERAL REGULATIONS The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850.03. Subd. 3. Definitions.is hereby amended as' follows: Building Height or Structure Height. (Commercial, Industrial and High Density Residential)The distance measured from the average existing ground elevation adjoining the building at the front building line to the top of the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round, or other arch -type roof, or to the average distance of the highest gable. on q. pitched or hip roof. References in this Section to building height shall include and mean'structure height, and if the structure is other than a building, the height shall be measured from said average existing ground elevation to the highest point of the structure. "Existing ground elevation" means the lowest of the following elevations: (1) the grade approved at the time:of the subdivision creating.the lot, (2) the grade at the time the last. demolition permit was issued for a principal structure that was on the lot, (3) the,grade at the4time the building permit for a principal structure on the lot is applied`for. Building Height or Structure Height. (Single & Two Dwelling Unit Buildings)The distance measured from the average existing ground. elevation adjoining the building at the front building line to the highest on a roof. References in this Section to building height shall include andl mean structure height, and if the structure is other than a building, the height shall be measured from said average existing ground elevation to the highes I of the structure. "Existing ground elevation" means the lowest of the, following elevations: (1) the grade approved at the time of the subdivision' creating the lot, (2) the grade at the time the last demolition permit wasF issued for a principal structure that was on the lot, (3) the grade at the time the building_permit for a principal structure on the lot is applied for. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text - XXXX r-� Added text —XXXX iResidential Maintenance Access. For a single and double dwelling unit, a clear flat walkway from a front yard to a rear yard. This area allows outside .pedestrian access and space to bring equipment from a front yard to a rear, yard without any encroachment on neighboring property.; Section 2. Subsection 850.07. Subd. 7. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7. Drainage, Retaining Walls & Site Access. CXiStinn rdraina a rate shall net be inGFeased nrJ' 1. Drainage. ��- a -r�ag� ����A rlirentien shall Ret be altered to reilireGt water to adjacent pmperties-. No person shall obstruct or divert the natural flow of runoff so as to harm the public health, safety or general welfare. Surface water runoff shall be properly Ghanneled ' conveyed i into storm sewers, watercourses, ponding areas or other public facilities. As part of the building permit, the applicant must submit a grading and erosion control plan along with a stormwater management plan that is signed by a licensed professional engineer. The stormwater management plan must detail how stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainage system. The plans must be approved by the city engineer and the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans.; dFaffinage and swales, shall be Feviev�ed and appFaved by the nigi� c r`TpriGr� � GE)RStr� ntinn OF inc tNllntinn 2. 'Retaining Walls. All retain_ ing walls must be shown on a grading; plan as part of a building permit application. Plans must demonstrate materials to be used for the retaining wall construction. Retaining walls taller than four (4) feet must_ meet a. three (3). foot setback. 3. Site Access. In an R -1 or R -2 Zoning District, a residential maintenance access of at least three (3) feet in width is required on one side of a single or two dwelling unit from the front yard to the rear yard.. Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX Section 3. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 6. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. Building Coverage. 1. Lots 9,000 Square Feet or Greater in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. On lots with an existing conditional use, if the combined total area occupied by all .accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, is 1,000 square feet or greater, a conditional use permit is required. 2. Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in Area. Building coverage shall be not more than 30 percent for all-buildings and structures, provided, however, that the area occupied by all . buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square feet. 3. The combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings and structures, excluding attached garages, shall not exceed 1,000 square feet for lots used for single dwelling unit buildings. 41 Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX . Added text — XXXX uilding Coverage shall include all principal or accesso uildincis, including, but not limited to:7 Decks and patios. The first 150 square feet of an unenclose deck or patio shall not be included when computing buildin b. Gazebos c. Balconies. d Breezeways. e. Porches. Accessory recreational facilities constructed above grade,] such as paddle tennis courts. The following improvements shall be excluded when computing building coverage: 3 Driveways and sidewalks, but not patios, subject to 3.a above F b. Parking lots and parking ramps. Accessory recreational facilities not enclosed by solid wal land not covered by a roof, including outdoor swimmir pools, tennis courts ,� ,and �. s`'huffleboard courts. h, �+,�- iliti� iw hinnhh are GenStWeted- abeye--g deg Si h as paddle tenn Unenclosed and uncovered steps and stoops less than 5 square feet. Overhanging eaves and roof projections not supported b 'posts .or pillars. Section 4. Subsection 850:.11. Subd. 7.A. is hereby amended -as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for SingI'Dwelling Unit Lots. u b eGti5fY 11, if aRY l+abeSsor — building eF St.F G it (ihGludinU, i or -any addition to e .. f , intended , . ... e in wh9le or in rn a, r residential nn � hGYi then such. arGesseFy building or Stn Gt ure rc.�rucrrcrai�c� y , � Tarr � y v � v � � u v �u � �. OF SU ddffitmen or pans shall nbrnply with .III of thc� vr— �aC-I� ei�- �}aiiJTV�� arr- cvrrrF".y-- ° °'c'r u�v��Ta... minimirn seth E;k requirements for a single dwelling unit building . ��T rrz� rr.�v requirements dwelling rrrrcr -�+ unit � � �.. u u � � � B. One Dwelling Unit Per Single Dwelling Unit Lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall be erected, placed or used on any lot unless the lot is subdivided into two or more lots pursuant to Section 810 of this Code. G. rlonl c nd Patios. eWthst of S bseGtion 850.07, Existing text — XXXX 4 Stricken text - XXXX r—� Added text —XXXX C. Basements. All single dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed with a basement having a gross floor area equal to at least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above. The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for purposes of this paragraph. D. Minimum Building Width. No more than 30 percent of the length, in the aggregate, of a single dwelling unit building shall measure less than 18 feet in width as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls: E. Parking Ramps Prohibited. No parking ramp shall be constructed in the R 1 District. F. Temporary retail sales of evergreen products from Conditional Use properties 1. The Manager may. grant a permit for temporary retail sales of evergreen products, if: a. the owner of the property or other non - profit group approved by the owner conducts the sale. -- b. the duration of the sale does not exceed 45 consecutive days and does not start before November 15 in any year. C. the sale area is located in a suitable off - street location that does not interfere with traffic circulation on the site or obstruct parking spaces needed by the principal use on the site. d. the sale area is not located within 200 feet of a property zoned and used for residential occupancy. - e. the hours of operation do not extend beyond 10:00 p.m. f. signage is limited to one sign per street frontage with an. aggregate sign area not exceeding 100 square feet. G. Additions to or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units. For add.itions,. alterations and changes to, or rebuilds of existing single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split Existing text — XXXX 5 Stricken. text — XXX-X Added text - X level dwelling is torn down and a new home is built, the new first floor or entry level elevation,may `not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the.home that was torn down. Subject to Section 850.11 Subd. 2. I. the, first floor elevation may be increased more than one (1) foot. The provisions of.this paragraph shall apply to all single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units including units in the flood plain overlay district. Any deviation from the requirements of this paragraph shall require a variance. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX 6 Section 5. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 6. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6 Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11). Front Street Side InteriorSide Rear Street Yard Yard 5. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings: garages, tee! g4iT�C.TCGOf S nreenheuses aP gapde' hence- g. all other 30' accessory buildings and structures. P. egress wind, N wells. '`Egress window wells may, encroach in the side yard setba k on one side. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X r—� Added text — XXXX 15' 5' 5' N U NA 7 C. Height 1. Single dwelling units buildings and structures accessory thereto. 2. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings, but not attached thereto. 3. All other buildings and structures 2 % stories. ^r 30 feet �nihinhrnier in loco f f maximum height see #4 below. 1 '/z stories or 18 feet whichever is less 3 stories or 40 feet whichever is less 4. The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a single or double dwelling unit shall be 35 YO'. feet. For lots that exceed 75 fee width, the maximum height to the ridge line shall be 35 feet, and the maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet. Section 6. Subsection 850.11. Subd. 7.A. is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 7 Special Requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in Subsection 850.07, the following special requirements shall apply. A. Special Setback Requirements for Single Dwelling Unit Lots. Elm W I im 3.4 -Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 Existing text — XXXX 8 Stricken text — XX-XX Added text —XXXX feet in length or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then for setback purposes the rear lot line.shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30, feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. 4. Rear Yard Setback - Corner Lots Required to Maintain Two Front Street Setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. 5. Through Lots. For a through lot, the required setback, for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front.shall be not less than 25 feet. 6. Interior Side Yard Setbacks for lots 60 -74 feet in width shall be as follows: Lot Width Required Interior Side Yard Setback 74 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 73 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 72 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 71 19'4" with no less than "9 feet on one side 70 18'8" with no less than 9 feet on one side 69 18' with no less than 9 feet on one side Existing text =XXXX 9 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX 68 17'4" with no less than 8 feet on one side 67 16'8" with no less than -8 feet on one side 66 16' with no. less than 8 feet on one side 65 15'4" with no less than 7 feet, on one side 64 14'87. with no less than 7 feet on one side 63 14' with no less than 7 feet on one side 62 13'4" with no less than 6 feet on one side 61 12'. 8 " total with no less than 6 feet on one side OR 6. Interior Side Yard Setbacks for lots greater than 49 feet,: but. less than 74 feet in width, the side yard setback shall be at Ii ast a total of 25% of the lot width with. a minimum setback no less than the current side yard setbacks. H. Sidewall Articulation for a Principal Structure. In order to avoid the monotonous appearance of long, unbroken building facades from abutting properties, the length of an exterior side wall shall not exceed thirty (30) feet without a) a minimum of at least a one (1) foot deep by. n (10) foot wide offset (projecting or recessed) or b) a combination te r Hof two (2) of the following architectural or utilitarian features every thirty _(30) feet: 1. Structural windows, awnings or canopies . ' 2. Projecting bay or box windows. 3. Stoops 4F— L-1 . Porchs 5. Chimneys (minimum depth of one (1) foot), 16. Balconies �7. Pilastersr 8 Second story roof ova erhang (at least twenty. percent 20 %) of the facade length) 9. Port- cocheres (a roofed structure extending from the building ,over an adjacent driveway that vehicles drive through, typically Existing text — XXXX 10 Stricken text — XXXX Added text - XXXX sheltering those getting out of vehicles or as a passageway to a garage, Section 7. Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this Ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Sections 5, and 6 of this Ordinance shall be.effective January 1, 2014. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at'its Regular Meeting of , 2013, and as recorded in-the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS.my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2013. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX, I _ Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -76 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 O C,; Q O �CORfbR!'i� lase To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. D. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: September 17, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: .Resolution No. 2013- 76 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipients departments for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -76 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-76 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows-cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said .. donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED „that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina 'Braemar Memorial Fund For Future Golf Course Equipment Purchases: Daniel Moran $100.00 Braemar Men's Club $150.00 Edina`Police Department: Dated September 17, 2013 Attest: F Debra A. Mangen;.City. Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 17, 2013; and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: MAYOR &COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Date: September 17, 2013 Agenda Item #: VIII. E. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution 2013 -81, Eminent Domain Acquisition of 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street Action Requested: Adopt resolution. 0 Information / Background: After many years in business, the owners have retired and closed the Hooten Dry Cleaning business located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street. This site is located immediately adjacent to the North Parking Ramp that provides public parking for the many employees and customers at the 50th and France Business District. City staff has been in contact with the property owners for several months as they contemplated retiring and finding a different use for the property. Earlier in 2013, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) approved Resolutions 2013 -1 and 2013 -8 that authorized the purchase of the property and the use of eminent domain, if necessary. Efforts to acquire the property through a negotiated sale, however,_have not been successful. After meeting with the property owners and on the advice of legal counsel, it is recommended that the City. of Edina (rather than the HRA) use its eminent domain authority to acquire the property. The City of Edina intends to use this authority to acquire the site while the building is without active businesses. The land acquisition will allow for expansion of the North Parking Ramp to help satisfy the public parking needs. The first floor of the expanded parking ramp may also include space for future municipal liquor operations, if determined feasible. This authorization is requested after the owners and other interested parties have had an opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns. Attachments: Resolution 2013 -81 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 %i RESOLUTION 2013 =81 EMINENT DOMAIN ACQUISITION - AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3944 WEST 49 -1/2 STREET WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the °HRK), owns and operates an off - street parking facility known as the North Parking Ramp at 3936 -3940 West 49 -1/2 Street ( "North Parking Ramp ") to provide public parking in the 50th and France business district; WHEREAS, the City of Edina ( "City ") and the HRA have studied the parking availability for the 50th and France business district and have determined that additional public parking is needed to support the continued success of this district, to meet the needs identified in the studies of public parking in the 50th and France area, and to reduce congestion, traffic and waiting periods in existing parking facilities in the area; WHEREAS, the COUNCIL has determined that expansion of the North Parking Ramp is necessary to provide additional public parking; WHEREAS, the COUNCIL has determined that acquisition of a fee simple interest in the - single -story- building- located -at -3944 WestA9- 1 /2- Street,_immediately_west_of the - North- Parking_ Ramp, is necessary to expand the North Parking Ramp to provide additional public parking; WHEREAS, the business owners have closed the business formerly operated at 3944 West 49-1/2 Street; WHEREAS, the City owns and operates a municipal liquor store at 3943 West 50th Street and has further determined that it may be necessary in the future to relocate said liquor store to a new location within the 50t6 and France business district; WHEREAS, a portion of the property at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street could be used to relocate the municipal liquor store currently located at 3943 West 50th Street, while still using the remainder of the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street site for expansion of the North Parking Ramp; WHEREAS the City and HRA have been negotiating with the owners of 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property to acquire a fee simple interest in said property and to date have not entered into an agreement to acquire said property; WHEREAS, in order to construct the expansion of the North Parking Ramp and to have a site available for the possible relocation of the Edina municipal liquor store currently located at 3943 West 50th Street, it will be necessary to procure the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property through the right of eminent domain; and CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaNIN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 c.t. 21 WHEREAS, the construction of the expansion of the North Parking Ramp makes it necessary for the City to acquire the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property as soon as possible, and no later than April 1, 2014, and in order to construct such improvements on a timely basis it will be necessary to procure the required property interest through a "quick take" condemnation action, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042; WHEREAS, the expansion of the North Parking Ramp is, in and of itself, a public purpose that justifies acquisition of the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property by eminent domain, and the acquisition of the site as a possible location for a municipal liquor store is a second public purpose that justifies acquisition of the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property by eminent domain; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL, that in order to expand the North Parking Ramp and obtain a site for the possible relocation of the municipal liquor store, the City proceed to acquire the required fee simple interest in the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street under its power of eminent domain and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042, having first fulfilled the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.036 and all other necessary requirements for the exercise of eminent domain power; and that the attorneys for the City be instructed and directed to advise and assist the City with regard to fulfilling any necessary legal conditions for the initiation of an eminent domain action, and to file the necessary petition or petitions therefore and to prosecute such action or actions to a successful conclusion, or until it is _-- _— abandoned,_d ism issed_or terminated-by the City or the Court; and that the attorneys for the City and the employees and agents of the City do all things necessary to be done in the commencement, prosecution and successful termination of such eminent domain proceedings; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it is hereby found and declared that the acquisition of a fee simple interest in the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street by the City under its power of eminent domain is necessary to expand the North Parking Ramp and to obtain a site for possible relocation of the municipal liquor store. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 17th day of September, 2013. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September 17, 2013, ,and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 12013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 17, 2013 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. C�,9�N �1 Y o e� • ,yC01iFOHJ+TFO • ST 1866 Agenda Item #: IX. A. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Deb Mangen From: Marie Sullivan <mariesullivan87 @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:20 PM To: ann swenson Cc: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Cary,.Teague; Scott Neal Subject: Lake Cornelia Road Construction Sept. 13, 2012 Dear City Council Members, Aaron and another engineer stopped by to talk with me about the grass /road construction issues. I appreciate their stopping by,because it gave me the chance -to explain to them how I hear all the neighbors complaints because I am out in my yard a lot on a relatively busy street so many walkers stop to tell me their frustrations. I suggested to the engineers that they understand the work from an engineer's perspective and have technical information that most residents do not. They said they are getting a lot of complaints and are realizing the gap between how engineers look at a whole project versus individual residents who see the progress from a different perspective. So, better communication will help. We discussed that there are 2 main problems. 1). There was conflicting information sent out to residents. One flyer said residents should water the seed regularly and another mailing said residents do not need to water because the contractor is responsible for watering. This created a problem because some residents can afford to run up their water bills with lawn sprinkling and they are frustrated that the neighborhood looks shoddy because many residents did not water. 2). My street has some neighbors who are doing the work themselves because they do not trust the city to do it right, and they are having a negative effect on the trust level other residents have that the city will "fix" everything well. So thanks for sending them over. and I hope the letter they said they plan to send out is helpful to the neighborhood:` The hailstorm and the drought did not help matters:) Sincerely,. Marie Sullivan Deb Man en rom: Marie Sullivan <mariesullivan87 @gmail.com> gent Friday, September 13, 2013 8:31 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Lake Edina Neighborhood road construction Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing to express concern and disappointment about the poor reconstruction of the Lake Edina Neighborhood road construction project. Very large portions of our yards were torn up and the city tried to save money by seeding which has been a disaster. The contractor hired to water the seed did not water adequately and much of the seed has died, leaving our neighborhood looking awful! Could you please drive through the neighborhood and see for yourself how terrible it looks? I feel bad because I know that the country club district and other parts of the city would never be left in such a poor state of reconstruction. The black dirt the company used to replace our former black dirt was of a rocky and poor quality. I have so many rocks remaining on my yard! Also they did a poor job leveling the topsoil and they left dips in the yardscape. A large; portion of our yards look awful! Something has to be done to rectify this! My neighbor across the street made the city remove the rocky poor quality soil they initially put in and replace it with better black dirt. He then made them level it better and as a result his is the only yard to look like our yards did before the construction. People's underground sprinkler systems were ripped apart and neighbors have told me the people hired to fix them did not do it right. Also, could the city please have them wash our streets! They have left a lot of dirt just sitting on our roads for weeks while they wait to add the top coat. They shoveled off clumps of dirt but the layer of dirt remaining on the roads has been there a very long time and they should wash it off. Please let us know that the lawn restoration will be addressed and fixed. We deserve to have our lawns restored to their former good quality. The current situation is not acceptable. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, Marie Sullivan Deb Mangen — From: World Wildlife Fund <ecomments @wwfus.org> on behalf of Dave Zens < davezens @comcast.net> Sent Thursday, September 12, 2013 3:33 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Enroll our Community in the 2013 Earth Hour City Challenge - From davezens @comcast.net Sep 12, 2013 Mayor James Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland, This message was sent from davezens @comcast.net Thank you for your efforts to improve our community. As a. resident, I am writing to express my deep concern about the threat that the impacts of climate . change pose to our community. That is why l urge you to enroll our community in World, Wildlife :Fund's Earth Hour'City Challenge ( http•// worldwi ldlife.org /citychallenge), which offers a platform to recognize and,,reward cities for the work'they do The City Challenge builds on the "annual Earth Hour event where millions around- the.globe turn outtheir lights for one hour in a call for action to protect the planet. All cities that share their sustainability efforts through the Earth Hour City Challenge will be publicly recognized and have a chance to compete for one of three $30,000 grants and be crowned an Earth Hour Capital! Learn more and enroll our city at http•// worldwildlife.orp /citychallenpe Participating in this initiative can help raise the profile of our existing sustainability efforts and encourage us to do even more to advance renewable energy and prepare for climate change. I sincerely hope you will visit the website and take advantage of this great opportunity. Sincerely, Mr. Dave Zens 4324 Grimes Ave S Edina, MN 55424 -1067 1 1 ! Deb Manqen 'rom: RICHARD YOUNG <richardyoung1145 @msn.com> Sent Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject forward to Joni Bennett Subject : old public works site. It was my understanding that the proceeds from sale of the "old" public works site was used in the cost justification for the new site. The projected dollar amount was shown to reduce the cost of the new site. Or am I mistaken? Thanks Richard Young 1 Deb Man en From: World Wildlife Fund <ecomments @wwfus.org> on behalf of Larry Osteraas <Osteraas @comcast.net> Sent Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:33 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Enroll our Community in the 2013 Earth Hour City Challenge - From lsteraas @comcast.net Sep 12, 2013 Mayor. James Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland, This message was sent from losteraas @comcast.net Thank you for your efforts to improve our community. As a resident, I am writing to express my deep concern about the threat that the impacts of climate change pose to our community. That is why I urge you to enroll our community in World Wildlife Fund's Earth Hour City Challenge ( http•// woridwiIdlife .org /citychaIlenge), which offers a platform to recognize and reward cities for the,,work they do. The City Challenge builds on the annual Earth Hour event where millions around the globe turnout their lights for one hour in a call for action to protect the planet. All cities that share their sustainability efforts through the Earth Hour City Challenge will be publicly recognized and have a chance to compete for one of three $30,000 grants and be crowned an Earth Hour Capital! Learn more and enroll our city at http•// worldwiIdlife.org /citychaIlenge Participating in this initiative can help raise the profile of:our existing sustainability efforts and encourage us to do even more to advance renewable energy and prepare for climate change. f sincerely hope you will visit the website and take advantage of this great opportunity. Sincerely, Mr. Larry Osteraas 6100 Ashcroft Ave Edina, MN 55424 -1726 But flights today, in truth, are lower. They cut the quiet like a sky -born mower. More flights are being concentrated in patterns smaller as they are mated into narrow bands that just so happen to fly above us and then crappen on our heads and on our homes. Their noise shakes us to our very bones. We've had enough, we're here to say. We won't go quietly, we're here to stay! We beg of you to hear our pleas, to listen to us. We're on our knees. Before the peace,here planes destroy, before the lives here they annoy, before the calm is ripped asunder, before there's no retreat from blunder. Before tonight's agenda ends, we're begging you, please, to make amends. Meet us, join us in the fray to return the peace to Edina's day. Rethink these plans, re -chart these flights and we'll retreat from these, our fights. But be assured, if all continues, that at this, and all other venues, We shall return, mad girls and boys, to fight against the noise, NOISE, NOISEUM JOHN CURRIE 9.10.13 2 THEY SAY EDINA WILL NEVER SEE a poem as lovely as a tree. They create calm and peaceful quiet but sadly, cannot prevent the riot of all the horrid, increasing noise that airplanes overhead, destroys. We chose to live here in Edina where life is good— indeed, it's fina. We gather friends and families 'neath shade of our protecting trees but no longer hear our girls and boys because of all that airplane noise. We raise our voices, we send our notes, we'd love to send to you our votes to say there are too many flights; they smash our days, despoil our nights. We can't relax outside, it's true, for conversations just don't go through. The peace is broken, the calm is shattered. But we're afraid that nothing's mattered to those folks at the FAA 'cause the flights continue to this day. We're told that there are no more flights today, than before, nor more at night. We're told that the truth and these statistics, this researched data, these fine logistics prove that our problems cannot be as awful as is said by we. 1 Deb Manqen From: John Currie <john @currieworks.com> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Last night's poem Attachments: They say Edina will never see.docx Hi, Jim. Here is that poem that I read last night at our meeting. I appreciate the opportunity that I had to share my comments with you, Jeff, Dan and our community. Best Regards, John Currie CURR!EWORKS, Inc. 4929 W Sunnsylope Road Edina 55424 johnCDcurrieworks.com +1952 928 3017 www.currieworks.com www.fineart.currieworks.com www brandsculpt.com 1 Can we confirm you as a November 1, 2013, "Extra Mile Day" city? Here is sample wording you could use in your proclamation:. WHEREAS, (city, state) is a community which acknowledges that a special vibrancy exists within the entire community when its individual citizens collectively "go the extra mile" in personal effort, volunteerism, and service; and WHEREAS; (city, state) is a community which encourages its citizens to maximize their personal contribution to the community by giving of themselves wholeheartedly and with total effort, commitment, and conviction to their individual ambitions, family, friends, and community; and WHEREAS, (city, state) is a community which chooses to shine a light on and celebrate individuals and organizations within its community who "go the extra mile" in order to make a difference and lift up fellow members of their community; and WHEREAS, (city, state) acknowledges the mission of Extra Mile America to create 400 Extra Mile cities in America and is proud to support "Extra Mile Day" on November 1, 2013. NOW THEREFORE, I, Mayor of (city, state) do hereby proclaim November 1, 2013 to be Extra Mile Day. I urge each individual in the community to take time on this day to not only "go the extra mile" in his or her own life, but to also acknowledge all those who are inspirational in their efforts and commitment to make their organizations, families, community, country, or world a better place. Proclamations can be scanned and emailed to us or mailed to: Extra Mile America Foundation 5034 Runway Drive Fair Oaks, CA 95628 We look forward to "going the extra mile" with you! Christine Christine Ott Director of Media and Public Outreach 310 - 619 -3205 Christine@ExtraMileAmerica.org Deb Man en From: Christine Ott <extramileamericafoundation @yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:04 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Extra Mile Day Proclamation Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing to request a proclamation to declare November 1, 2013, Extra Mile Day ...a day to recognize the, people and organizations in Edina who are creating positive change through their extra mile efforts in volunteerism and service. (I have included proclamation language near the .end of this email.) Extra Mile- America (www. Extra MileAmerica.or4) is unwavering in its commitment to remind individuals and organizations that creating positive change is not just a -water cooler topic, but it is unselfishly tied to go- the - extra -mile action. As a volunteer staff, we continue to be an organization that casts a bright light on the Extra Mile Heroes" and change- makers who surround us and who continue to give their best. Can we confirm you as a November 1, 2013, "Extra Mile Day" city? When we receive confirmation that you will do a proclamation, your city's name will be posted on the Extra Mile America website, be included in the participating city list sent to the White House, and have local press contacted regarding your Mayor's participation. If you would like to do something beyond a proclamation, we have two options: 1) Submit names of local "Extra Mile Heroes." In addition to a November 1 declaration, submit 1 -5 names of amazing extra mile people and /or organizations that are making significant contributions to make your city better. These people /organizations will be included on our website with their specific contribution, and their names will be sent to the White House as extra -mile change makers whose service truly stands out and deserves to be recognized. 2) A quote by your Mayor. In addition to a November 1 declaration, your quote of what it personally means to "go the extra mile" will be highlighted on our website and shared with your local media. Last year, 362 inspirational mayors and city leaders stood up and jointly recognized November if 2012, as Extra Mile Day ...a day to recognize the people and organizations in your local community who are creating positive_ change through their extra mile efforts in volunteerism and service. Started in 2009 by Founder Shawn Anderson and his vision that one person CAN make a difference, Extra Mile Day has grown from 23 participating cities in its inaugural year, to 116 in 2010, to 228 in 2011, to 362 in 2012 ... and this year, a goal of 400 cities has been set. We look forward to your city joining are an I happy Mile Day city. jump forward Iw t there our best effort on you do to help you plan something special, behalf. Deb Man en From: Jennifer Rowland <jenniferrowland @comcast.net> Sent Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:04 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject Proposed Blackfoot Pass Lot Subdivision To the Edina Planning Commision and City Council Members, I am writing on behalf of my husband David Rowland and myself to address a proposed subdivision of a recently purchased lot on Blackfoot Pass in the Indian hills ineighborhood in which we reside. We have'lived in two homes in Edina for most of the past 21 years and we have enjoyed both homes for their unique qualities. Our first home was at . 5003 Arden Avenue in the grucewood neighborhood of Edina. We enjoyed the many amenities of living in close proximity to 50th & France and Arden Park as our children grew up. Our second home in Edina is located at 6605 Dakota Trail. This property includes a second parcel, 66,01 Dakota.Trail which the previous owners had purchased and combined to create'an even larger property in the beautiful Indian Hills neighborhood. We chose this home after learning more about the.west side of Edina and came to appreciate the larger lots, beautiful trees and more country-like feel. Although we moved out of the east side of Edina, we had come to learn -that the features of the Indian Hills neighborhood met our needs an desires for our current phase of life. The neighborhood diversity in Edina makes it a stronger community. The distinct characteristics of each neighborhood allows Edina to meet the needs of a variety of people with a variety of needs and desires. The proposed subdivision is in with the unique characteristics provided in the Indian Hills neighborhood. It would be a mistake to allow this sort of transformation to occur,. and it would weaken an important strength of the city of Edina. Thank you for the consideration of our perspective in this matter. David and Jennifer Rowland 6605 & 6601 Dakota Trail Edina, Mn 55439 Sent from my iPhone Wednesday, September 11, 2013 To: Mayor James Hovland; mail@EdinaMN.gov Councilmember Joni Bennett; jonibennett12@comcast.net Councilmember Mary Brindle; mbrindle ®comcast.net Councilmember Josh Sprague; joshsprague@edinarealty.com Councilmember Ann Swenson; swensonannl@gmail.com City Manager Scott Neal; sneal@EdinaMN.gov Dear City Officials: We are several residents of Belmore Lane east of Blake Road who want to bring the following to your attention. There was an event held at Interlachen Country Club on Friday, July 26, through Sunday, July 28. On each of these days, some event attendees and/or employees parked on Belmore Lane, many of them for the entire day. They entered Interlachen through an unlocked gate in the fence bordering Interlachen's practice area. Managers at Interlachen encouraged them to do this. We know this because, on the first morning of this event, event attendees/ employees who had parked on Belmore said to a neighbor that Interlachen's pool manager "told us to park here" and that Interlachen's caddy master "told us to park here ". The attached photos show the long lines of cars parked on Belmore and the open gate - and a man walking across the practice area, coming through the open gate, and walking up Belmore to his car. To get approval for its Conditional Use Permit in 2009, Interlachen Country Club agreed in Section 3: from the internal access points from 4. Access to the buildings shall be Waterman Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard, and not Maloney Avenue or Belmore Lane. 5. Maloney Avenue and Belmore Lane-may not be used by construction vehicles accessing the site, or for parking. Interlachen's directing people to use Belmore for parking is a clear violation of the conditions that merited Interlachen s C.U.P. We respectfully request that you take steps to ensure this breach of the C.U.P. will not occur again. Thank you. i Craig and Sarah Bennett (6229 Belmore Lane) Cheryl Bristol (6208 Belmore Lane) Wendy Donovan and Allan Dold (317 John Street, corner of John and Belmore) Mary McDonald (6216 Belmore Lane) Jill Rivard and Bill McGilvray (6224 Belmore Lane) Rick and Sue Windham (6233 Belmore Lane) Deb Man en From: Mary McDonald <marymarymcmc @yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:33 PM To: Edina Mail; Councilmember Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Councilmember Josh Sprague; Councilmember Ann Swenson; Scott Neal Subject: Violation of Conditional Use Permit Attachments: Letter to City Officials.docx Dear Mayor Hovland; Councilmembers Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, and Swenson; City Manager Neal, Please see the attached letter and photos. We appreciate your concern. Sincerely, Residents of Belmore Lane: Craig and Sarah Bennett Cheryl Bristol Wendy Donovan and Allan Dold Mary McDonald Jill Rivard and Bill McGilvray Rick and Sue Windham Photos of Belmore Lane on 7 -26 -2013 1 Deb Man en From: Jim Smart < smart@smart- associates.com> Sent Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:13 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Mayor Jim Hovland Hi Jim, It was nice to run into you on "our trail" the other day while you were doing some "fact finding." As I told you then, we are very concerned about, what will obviously, be a great loss to our regional community, so I'm writing to you today to beg you to support the City of Minneapolis in its efforts to not co- locate (including shallow tunnel) freight rail and LRT on the Kenilworth Greenway. The Kenilworth Greenway is a regional asset used by Edina residents to commute to work, attend Minneapolis events and everyday enjoyment of the Twin Cities' regional trail system. Ask my Edina pal, Marty Mathis, who rides his bike every day, winter and summer to his downtown haberdashery. He'll be the first to tell you that it's more than just a nice trail, it's an essential link to our two Cities. I respect the Edina Parks & Recreation Department's mission "to do our part in further developing, preserving, and maintaining the City of Edina's parks, recreation programs and resources as a premier and comprehensive parks and recreation department in the Twin Cities area." Please respect Mayor Rybak and the Minneapolis City Council to determine what is best for Minneapolis, the Kenilworth Greenway and the nearly one million Kenilworth Greenway users. Warm regards, Jim Jim Smart SMART ASSOCIATES LTD. 701 4th Avenue South Suite 201 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 -- -335 -8797 smart@smart— associates_. corn PBefore printing this e-mail, think if it is necessary. Think Green. Deb Man en From: kelly a jungels <kjungels @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 7:28 PM To: Edina Mail Subject. subdivision in Indian Hills Mayor James Hovland, I am writing because I do not support the subdivision of the 6900 Blackfoot Pass lot. I live at 6400 Indian Hills rd. I love my street, I love my neighborhood. I had 2 homes in the Country Club neighborhood and I liked it there too. Both neighborhoods have their own feel. And I feel subdividing the 6900 lot changes the feel of our neighborhood. We don't have another house as close to the street as the builder is proposing for one of the homes. I moved to this part of town for space and privacy. Changing just one lot into two makes it easier going forward. Please consider preserving what Indian Hills has. The "feel" is has, because it is really unique. Thank you, Kelly Jungels 1 Deb Man en From: Hedy Holmberg <hedy.holmberg @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 4:28 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Proposed Subdivision of 5 Merilane Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Re: Proposed Subdivision of 5 Merilane, Edina My husband and I have lived in the Rolling Green neighborhood at 4604 Merilane for 21 years and chose this neighborhood because of the large -lots; it is like living in the country but having the amenities that only the community of Edina can provide. We have seen the proposed subdivision, of 5 Merilane into three. lots and the proposed placement of the homes on these three building sites. If three homes were to be built on these pie- shaped lots they would have to be crowded together at the back of each property to satisfy the setback requirements; this would destroy the character of the Rolling Green neighborhood and negatively impact on the property values of the adjacent neighbors. Already Rolling Green is beginning to look like the Country Club neighborhood on steroids. John Adams stated in a letter that the lot can be subdivided into three lots without a variance, and if that is accurate, then the neighbors will have to accept that. However, should the future owners 'of these lots and their builders request a variance of the set back requirements or any lot line variances we will oppose those requests. Rolling Green is a beautiful neighborhood and I ask you to please preserve its unique character and charm by not allowing the subdivision of this.property into three lots: Thank you, Hedy and Mark Holmberg 4604 Merilane Edina, MN 55436 STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES Whereas: 30,000 Americans across the country are killed every year as a result of gun violence, destroying families and communities in big cities and small towns; and Whereas: As Mayors, we are duty -bound to do everything in our power to protect our residents, especially our children, from harm -and there is no greater threat to public safety than the threat of illegal guns; Now, therefore, we resolve to work together to find innovative new ways to advance the following principles: • Punish — to the maximum extent of the law — criminals who possess, use, and traffic in illegal guns. • Target and hold accountable irresponsible gun dealers who break the law by knowingly selling guns to straw purchasers. • Oppose all federal efforts to restrict cities' right to access, use, and share trace data that is so essential to effective enforcement, or to interfere with the ability of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms to combat illegal gun trafficking. • Keep lethal, military-style weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines off our streets. • Work to develop and use technologies that aid in the detection and tracing of illegal guns. • Support all local, state, and federal legislation that targets illegal guns; coordinate legislative, enforcement, and litigation strategies; and share information and best practices. • Invite other cities to join us in this new national effort. (Signature) (Date) (Mayor's Office Address) (Mayor's Telephone) (Staff Contact Name) (Staff Position) (Mayoral Term -- MM/YYYY to MM/YYYY) (Mayor's Name —please print) (City, State, Zip) (Mayor's Email Address) (Staff Member's Telephone) (Staff Email) (Elected as — e.g. Rep., Dem., non-partisan, independent) To join Mayors Against Illegal Guns, please fill in the information above and return this form to the coalition via fax at 212 - 312 -0760. Alternatively, you can email a PDF of the signed statement to statement(a-) ,mayorsa - ainstillegalauns.org. Deb Man en From: Christopher Kelly <ckelly @maig.org> Sent Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:33 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Fwd: Mayors Against Illegal Guns - Minnesota Attachments: statement of_principles.pdf Mayor Hovland, I wanted to follow up from the Regional Council of Mayors meeting yesterday. Mayor Lindstrom suggested I email you. I hope you will consider joining Mayors Against Illegal Guns. As you may already know, MAIG is the largest grassroots gun violence prevention organization in the nation with more than 1,000 mayors and over 1.5 million active supporters. The current coalition in Minnesota includes Mayor Ness of Duluth, Mayor Lindstrom of Falcon Heights, Mayor Rybak of Minneapolis, Mayor Martin of Shoreview, and Mayor Coleman of St. Paul. We are Democrats, Republicans, Independents and gun owners who respect the second amendment and are dedicated to keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and the dangerously mentally ill. I am happy to provide more information if you like. I have attached the Statement of Principles mayors sign to join. Please email a PDF of the signed statement to me at ckellv(@maig.org. We would indeed be honored to welcome you into the MAIG Coalition and thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, Chris Kelly MAIG -MN Deb Mangen Subject FW: Thank you Can you forward this on the the appropriate people Darrell Todd, Assistant Fire Chief 952 - 826 -0328 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0393 DTodd 6D Edina MN.gov_ I www.EdinaMN.eov /Fire - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pat Sandon Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:30 AM To: Darrell Todd Subject: FW: Thank you Chief Todd, Another satisfied customer. This was a wash machine motor fire. Pat Sandon, Fire Captain 952 - 826 -0330 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0393 Psandon @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Fire - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Neil Brenner [mailto:nbrenneri@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:08 AM To: Pat Sandon Cc: iudviudv22 @comcast.net Subject: Thank you Captain Sandon, We would like to thank you and the Edina Fire Department for your prompt response and service this morning. It gives our family great comfort to know the prompt response, skill level, caring and integrity of the Edina Fire Department. Thank you once again. Respectfully, Neil and Judy Brenner 5021 Wooddale Lane Edina Mn 55402 Sent from my iPad 1 W Deb Man en From: Mayhew, Scott <Scott.Mayhew @ATK.COM> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:47 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council Why are your city cops playing highway patrol? I was attempting to get a plate number of a vehicle who threw stones and gravel from the ramp to HWY 100 from 62W, when one of your city cops pulled me over. I was not about to disobey your officer, but, I would have liked to been able to be pulled over by a legitimate trooper, so that the other vehicle could be stopped. That way a report could have been filed and I would not have to pay out of pocket for a new windshield. Now my insurance rates go up and I didn't even get to report the incident that I was trying to report. Your city cops should not be playing highway patrol. They are not trained for that job. They do more harm than good. Scott A Mayhew G4S Security Officer (952)351 -3011 Scott. mayhew@ATK:C <) N Susan Haigh September 6, 2013 Page 2 We would be happy to meet with you to discuss this matter. We continue to have no objection to the original layout with the LRT constructed on the southwest side of Highway 212. Sincerely, Daniel Enge sma President/COO cc: Nancy Tyra- Lukens Mayor City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie City Center 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Terry Schneider Mayor City of Minnetonka Minnetonka City Hall 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 Jeff Jacobs Mayor City of St. Louis Park St. Louis Park City Hall 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Daren Nyquist Community Outreach Coordinator Southwest LRT Project Office Park Place West Building, Suite 500 6465 Wayzata Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55426 James Hovland Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 KRAUS- ANDERSON, KRAUS- ANDERSON®, ® INCORPORATED GXly C SFA& w ; p 2013 September 6, 2013 C" , C: Susan Haigh Chair Metropolitan Council 390 North Robert Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 523 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 O 612.332.7281 F 612.332.0217 Re: Southwest LRT — Objection of Kraus - Anderson, Incorporated to Proposed Routing: 6442 -6462 City West Parkway, Eden Prairie, Minnesota Dear Ms. Haigh: Kraus- Anderson, Incorporated has received a request from Southwest LRT, Green Line extension, to enter onto its Primetech Office Park property located at 6442 -6462 City West Parkway, Eden Prairie, Minnesota to do various testing.in connection with establishing a route for the Southwest LRT. The LRT plans until recently had shown that the LRT corridor would be constructed across Highway 212 from the Primetech property, .a layout to which we had no objection. Now, however, in connection with the Southwest LRT's request to enter onto the Primetech property, we have learned that there has been a route change which will move the LRT tracks to the northwest side of Highway 212 and on to the Primetech property. This move will have significant adverse impacts on the Primetech property and also on the West Shady Nine office property located at 6600 City West Pkwy that is owned by Osborne Properties Limited Partnership, a related Kraus- Anderson entity. At a time when financial considerations are key to this LRT line moving forward, we think the newly revised design which will take property from the Primetech property and .impair visibility of the Primetech property, an impairment for which compensation must be paid in Minnesota, is not well conceived. Until this issue is resolved, we will not grant permission for the LRT's engineers, contractors or others to enter the Primetech property because we believe it will simply advance a route that is not beneficial either to Kraus- Anderson as the owner of the Primetech property or to the public which must pay for this project. coward, buffett nding Hope in a Hungry World )w• Buffett is a farmer, conservation - hilanthropist. He has served on ds of the World Wildlife Fund itional Council, National Geographic )uncil, the Africa Foundation, and Berk - ire- Hathaway, where his father, Warren iffett, is the primary shareholder. He s traveled to over 95 countries, sup - �rting initiatives to improve agriculture, trition, and access to clean water. In his w book, 40 Chances: Finding Hope a Hungry World, he explores creative proaches to building food security for ople around the world. ovember 7 7:00 pm eben alexander ;�. The Nature of Consciousness Eben Alexander is a neurosurgeon who has served on the medical staff at Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston Children's Hos- pital, and Massachusetts General Hospital a and on the faculty of the Harvard Medical School, Duke University Medical Center, and the University of Massachusetts Medical School. He is the author of the bestseller Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's - Journey into the Afterlife, which recounts his near -death experience and his subse- quent commitment to researching the na- ture of human consciousness. Co- sponsor: Hennepin County Library The Town Hall Forum is held at Westminster Presbyterian Church, Nicollet Mall and 12th Street, in downtown Minneapolis. Each forum is preceded by a half -hour concert and followed by a public reception. Minnesota Public Radio broadcasts forums on its News 'nformation stations. Convenient parking lable at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, Niuoilet Mall and 13th Street, and the 11 th and Marquette Ramp, across the street from Orchestra Hall. Forums are free and open to the public. We welcome your financial support. Donations can be mailed to the Westminster Town Hall Forum, 1200 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55403. Questions? Visit westminsterforum.org, or contact Susan McKenna at 612- 332 -3421, or smckenna@ wpc- mpls.org. november 21 noon an - ethical perspective r � Visit westminsterforum.org using this OR code: ❑� . fall 2013 mark mckinnon valerie plame wilson howard buff ett eben alexander mark mckinnon Making Government Work Mark McKinnon has been a political advisor and communications strategist for more than three decades. He has helped engineer five winning presidential primary and general elec- tions and has worked for such diverse politi- cal candidates as President George W. Bush, Senator John McCain, Governor Ann Rich- ards, and Congressman Charlie Wilson. He is the co- founder of the Washington -based organization No Labels, a movement among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents who are committed to bipartisanship, civil discourse, and problem - solving in politics. Collaborators: Citizens League and No Labels Minnesota september 26 noon valerie plame wilson Security, Surveillance, and Privacy Valerie Plame Wilson is a public advocate and recognized authority on national secu- rity and counter - proliferation. For over 20 years, she served as a covert operations officer in the CIA, working to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruc- tion. In 2003, her role as a CIA operative was revealed in a nationally syndicated col - ? umn, resulting in her resignation from the CIA. She is the author of the memoir Fair Game, which explores her views on abuse s.: of the public trust, and her new book Blow - ., back, the first in a series of spy novels. october 15 7:00 pm I { I u 1200 MARQUETTE AVENUE WEST MINI TER MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 TOWN' HALL P 612.332.3421 FORUM f 612.332.7212 September 4, 2013 James Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear James: The Westminster Town Hall Forum, the Citizens League, and No Labels Minnesota invite you to a public presentation and private luncheon with Mark McKinnon on Thursday, September 26, 2013, at Westminster Presbyterian Church, Nicollet Mall and 12th Street, in downtown Minneapolis. Mr. McKinnon will speak in Westminster's sanctuary from NOON to 1:00pm on the topic Stop Fighting, Start Fixing: Making Government Work. The private luncheon with Mr. McKinnon will follow from 1:00'to 2 :00pm in the Meisel Room at Westminster. For more than three decades, Mark McKinnon has been a political advisor and communications strategist. He is global vice - chairman of Hill & Knowlton Strategies and president of Maverick Media. He is a co- founder of the Washington -based organization No Labels, a movement among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents committed to bipartisanship, civil discourse, and problem - solving in politics. As always, the Westminster Town Hall Forum is free and open to the public, and we encourage you to spread the word among your colleagues and friends about this special presentation. However, the private luncheon with Mr. McKinnon is for invited guests only, and a reservation is required. Seating is limited, so if you plan to attend the luncheon, please contact Susan McKenna no later than Monday, September 23, by phone (612- 332 -3421, x236), or by e-mail (smckenna @wpc- mpis.org). We look forward to seeing you at the Westminster Town Hall Forum! Sincerely, - C�j QL-L�� Susan McKenna Sean Kershaw Chelle Stoner Town Hall Forum Citizens League No Labels MN G�SY C 91 S 11�� � L 2p13 Deb Man en From: Sandra Genau <sgenau79 @gmail.com> Sent Monday, September 09, 2013 12:23 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Warner Estate Property Subdivision Dear Council Members, I am writing to let you know that unfortunately I have lost all access to my email account as of Wednesday night last week. If any of you has sent me a message regarding the Warner property, I'm afraid I didn't see it. Please resend any correspondence to: sgenau79(a,gmail. com. I appreciate your time and attention and apologize for any inconvenience! Thank you, Sandi Genau 6 Merilane Avenue Edina, MN 55436 cell - 410 - 336 -9089 Susan Harker Brunn 6601 Blackfoot Pass Edina NN 55439 1. I believe that it sets a dangerous precedent regarding the "downsizing" of ' the beautiful, large lots in Indian Hills. One of the things that drew me to the neighborhood was the beautiful, generous, wooded lots in the area. To begin chopping these up into smaller lots would change the character of this well established and sought after neighborhood. 2. Large properties in Edina are becoming rare. When the news is constantly full of complaints from neighbors regarding large houses being built on small lots throughout Edina, it seems that this large lot would be appealing to a potential homeowner or developer as it is. There are fewer-large lots available, and yet the demand for large houses continues. It seems that it would behoove the City of Edina to maintain these large parcels as they are. 3. Great Neighborhood Homes, the pending buyer of the property, recently completed another home in my neighborhood, on Cheyenne .Trail: The new house that they built completely dwarfs the surrounding'homes" in spite of the seemingly generous lot size. I am extremely concerned that the two houses that are being proposed will not be in proportion to the new lot sizes, and will stick out like sore thumbs, instead of blending in and looking like part of an established neighborhood. I plan on attending the City Council meeting this Wednesday, September 11 th, to voice my concerns. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 4 Deb Man en From: ann Swenson <swensonannl @gmail.com> Sent Monday, September 09, 2013 12:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Re: FW: Proposed Subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass Susan, the meeting on the 11th is the Planning Commission. They hear all subdivisions first. They take public comment so it is an important meeting to attend. We will hear this at a later date. There is a public hearing also when we have this on our agenda. Ann Swenson, council On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Edina Mail <mail(@edinamn.gov> wrote: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ppr'cYr,pp' J 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 k ` his. Ibiunno(rDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6i Doing Business From: Susan Brunn [mailto:sbrunn me.com] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 8:25 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Proposed Subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass Dear Mayor Hovland: I am writing to you regarding the proposed subdivision of the lot located at 6609 Blackfoot Pass. As a 20 year resident of the Indian Hills neighborhood, and specifically, of a property at 6601 Blackfoot Pass, I am against this subdivision for the following reasons: 1 makes it easier for the next to pass. Now is the time to halt that process and leave the beauty of the neighborhood intact for its residents. Subdivision of this lot would change the character of the Indian Hills neighborhood forever. TO: Planning Commission Members and City Council Members FROM: Bert and Charles Ledder, 6709 Cheyenne Trail, Edina, MN 55439 Date: September 6, 2013 RE: Proposed Subdivision and Variance of 6609 Blackfoot Pass We are writing in opposition to the proposed subdivision and set back variance of the property at 6609 Blackfoot Pass. Our primary objection is to the variance requested to alter the front setback to 45 feet from the street. The adjacent property to the south 6705 Cheyenne Tail has a setback of 100.9 feet, moving the proposed building site 55.9 feet closer to the street, and the adjacent property to the north 6605 Blackfoot Pass has a setback of 62 feet, moving the building 17 feet closer to the street. Great Neighborhood Homes' use of setback averages of homes on'the island block on the opposite side of the street is not relevant to the sight lines of the street. As this is a corner lot, specific codes apply, and should not be dismissed simply because these are wooded lots. A building of this size, this close to the street will have an obvious impact as well as safety concerns for traffic on this blind corner. The placement of a building on the proposed sites also will displace and greatly alter water drainage onto the lot to the south, 6705 Cheyenne Trail. The terminal moraine terrain of these lots together creates a bowl, with water pooling from the drainage off the hills surrounding the properties into the proposed building site. This was very obvious during heavy rains in the past month as well as the storm of July 23, 1987 when water flooded and pooled in this area. This drainage issue does not comply with Section 1. Subsection 850.07. Subd. 7 of the Edina City Zoning Ordinances. The developer's numbers do not reflect the accurate square footage of the properties located on the non - meandering body of water known as Indianhead Lake. The square footage as stated by the developer does not include the fully taxable land /water area. If the water receded homeowners on that land could use this part of their property for their desired usage. Obviously, no one will build a home in the middle of the lake to diminish their site. This is also true for properties located at 6709 Cheyenne Trail and 6713 Cheyenne Trail. These lots, while they appear smaller in square footage, have back yards that abut the St. Alban's Church property which requires by Code a 3 acre lot size. Thus, their properties appear larger in keeping with the large lot appearance of the neighborhood. There is no hardship that requires building on this site. It is not a homeowner requesting a variance to expand their home or to use it in a different fashion. This is an unbuildable section of a property that is being purchased by a developer for the purpose of building a speculation home. If the subdivision and variance request is allowed, the developer moves on, leaving the residents of the neighborhood with a permanent undesirable change. Indian Hills is a neighborhood of large wooded lots that will have constant pressure for subdivision. Each subdivision diminishes the character of the neighborhood, shrinks the average lot size, and Deb Manaen From: Bert Ledder <Isledder @aol.com> Sent Monday, September 09, 2013 10:00 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Opposition to Variance and Subdivision proposal of 6609 Blackfoot Pass Attachments: Council letter.docx The Honorable Mayor Hovland, We are writing this letter to show our opposition to the proposed Subdivision and Variance request for 6609 Blackfoot Pass. Our letter is attached. If you have questions please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Bert & Charles Ledder 6709 Cheyenne Trail Edina, MN 55439 952 941 9803 612 968 2725 Bert Ledder 1 Christine Ott Chri stinegExtraMileAmerica. ors 310- 619 -3205 2 Deb Mangen From: Extra Mile America <extramileamerica .foundation @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 8:48 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Join Us for Extra Mile Day Dear Mayor Hovland, Last year, 362 inspirational mayors and city leaders stood up and jointly recognized November 1, 2012, as Extra Mile Day... a day to recognize the people and organizations in your local community who are creating positive change through their extra mile efforts in volunteerism and service. We are writing to ask that Edina join cities in every state in the nation and. proclaim November 1, 2013, Extra Mile Day. (I can send you proclamation language or it is available on our website.) This year, our mission. continues... and builds. With a 100% volunteer staff, Extra Mile America (www.ExtraMileAmerica.org) is unwavering in its commitment to remind individuals and organizations that creating positive change is not just a water cooler topic, but it is unselfishly tied to go -the- extra -mile action. We continue to be an organization that casts a bright light on the "Extra Mile Heroes " and change- makers who surround us and who continue to give their best. Whether it is one elected official or one non- elected government employee, whether it is one citizen or one business with 1,000 amazing people, ONE does make a difference. By declaring November 1, 2013, Extra Mile Day, your city joins this nationwide movement. Started in 2009 by Founder Shawn Anderson and his vision that one person CAN make, a difference, Extra Mile Day has grown from 23 participating cities in its inaugural year, to 116 in 2010, to 228 in 201 lJo 362 in 2012 ... and this year, a goal of 400 cities has been set. Can we confirm you as a November 1, 2013, "Extra Mile Day" city? When we receive confirmation that you will do a proclamation, your city's name will be posted on the Extra Mile America website, be included in the participating city list sent to the White House, and have local press contacted regarding the city Mayor's participation. If the Mayor would like to do something beyond a proclamation, we have two options: 1) Submit names of local "Extra Mile Heroes." In addition to a November 1 declaration, submit 1 -5 names of amazing extra mile people and/or organizations that are making significant contributions to make your city better. These people /organizations will be included on our website with their specific contribution, and their names Will be sent to the White House as extra -mile change makers whose service truly stands out and deserves to be recognized. 2) A quote by your Mayor. In addition to a November 1 declaration, the Mayor's quote of what it personally means to "go the extra mile" will be highlighted on our website and shared with your local media. We look forward to your city joining as an Extra Mile Day city. If there is anything we can do to help you plan something special, we are happy to jump forward with our best effort on your behalf. Can we confirm you as a November 1, 2013, "Extra Mile Day" city? We look forward to "going the extra mile" with you! Christine ._ _ Thank_ y _ou_for__y_our_consideration.__ Sincerely, Susan Harker Brunn 6601 Blackfoot Pass Edina MN 55439 z Deb Mangen From: Susan Brunn <sbrunn @me.com> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 8:25 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Proposed Subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass Dear Mayor Hovland: I am writing to you regarding the proposed subdivision of, the lot located at 6609 Blackfoot Pass. As a 20 year resident of the Indian Hills neighborhood, and specifically, of a property at 6601 Blackfoot Pass, I am against this subdivision for the following reasons: 1. I believe that it sets a dangerous precedent regarding the "downsizing" of the beautiful, large lots in Indian Hills. One. of the things that drew me to the neighborhood was the beautiful, generous, wooded lots in the area. To begin chopping these up into smaller lots would change the character of this well established and sought after neighborhood. 2. Large properties in Edina are becoming rare. When the news is constantly full 'of complaints from neighbors regarding large houses being built on small lots throughout Edina, it seems that this large lot would be appealing to a potential homeowner or developer as it is. There are fewer large lots available, and yet the demand for large houses continues. It seems that it would behoove the City of Edina to maintain these large parcels as they are. 3. Great Neighborhood Homes, the pending buyer of the property, recently completed another home in my neighborhood, on Cheyenne Trail. The new house that they built completely dwarfs the surrounding homes, in spite of the seemingly generous lot size. I am extremely concerned that the two houses that are being proposed will not be in proportion to the new lot sizes, and will stick out like sore thumbs, instead of blending in and looking like part of an established neighborhood. I plan on attending the City Council meeting this Wednesday, September 11 th, to voice my concerns. Deb Man en From: Jody Strakosch <jstrakosch @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 3:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: no co- location of freight and light rail on the Kenilworth Greenway Mayor Jim Hovland City of Edina edinamailOci.edina.mn.us Dear Mayor Jim Hovland: I am writing to ask that you support the City of Minneapolis in its efforts to not co- locate (including shallow tunnel) freight rail and LRT on the Kenilworth Greenway. The Kenilworth Greenway is a. regional asset used by Edina residents to commute to work, attend Minneapolis events and everyday enjoyment of the Twin Cities' regional trail system. Personally, I use the Kenilworth Greenway to go visit my friends who live in Edina. I respect the Edina Parks & Recreation Department's mission "to do our part in further developing, preserving, and maintaining the City of Edina's parks, recreation programs and resources as a premier and comprehensive parks and recreation department in the Twin Cities area." Please respect Mayor Rybak and the Minneapolis City Council to determine what is best for Minneapolis, the Kenilworth Greenway and the nearly one million Kenilworth Greenway users. Thank you for any support you may be able to lend to this effort. Jody Strakosch 2200 Newton Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55405 612- 377 -5905 1 Annabelle and Art Thelemann 5132 Valley View Road Edina, Minnesota 55436 (952) 831 -2860 Deb Mangen - - From: a2t2 @comcast.net Sent Sunday, September 08, 2013 12:03 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinareality.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Edina Mail Subject Second notice:The Proposed Birchcrest B improvement No: BA 410 project SECOND NOTICE: Having heard from only the Mayor's Office and Council Member Ann Swenson, we would like to once again invite Mayor Hovland and the entire Edina City Council to take a brief walking /biking /driving (your choice) tour with us to review the proposed concrete sidewalk down Valley View Road to Code Avenue. We are walking distance from city hall for Pete's sake! Please do not cast your vote for this project based on a few colored lines affixed to an aerial photograph of the proposed project. We realize that none of you live along the proposed concrete sidewalk route down Valley View Road, but we do! The photograph that was sent to all affected residents does not show any of the current pedestrian bridges over HWY 100, it does not identify any of the current city parks undergoing total restoration (Garden and County Side), lakes are not labeled, current bike lanes are not identified which is a crime since all are in compliance with the new Edina Living Streets Policy. The proposed Valley View Road concrete sidewalk is in complete violation of the City of Edina Living Streets Policy. Portions of the proposed project absolutely do not "balance the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in a way that promotes safety and convenience, enhances economic vitality, creates opportunities for active living and sustains the environment" as outlined in the Living Streets Policy. In fact aspects of the proposal do not create opportunities for active living, do not sustain the environment, and most definitely does not enhance economic vitality. In fact, this portion of the proposed project will actively divert pedestrians and bicyclists away from local merchants. So what exactly are the "Living Street policy" enhancements brought to the City of Edina by this portion of the Birchcrest B project? NOTE: a petition in opposition to the Valley View sidewalk proposal is currently being circulated for signatures on a door -to -door grass roots campaign that should reach the City Council the week of September 16, 2013. And Contrary to what city planners would have the City Council believe, the petition will verify the strong opposition to this portion of the project by the people who actually live on Valley View Road. We look forward to our tour, please give us a call so we can plan a time to tour Valley View Road! 1 Im Years ago, this was a tree filled lot Please, don't start a precedent by dividing the lots in Indian Hills. Thank you for taking the time to hear our input, Mary and Dean Swanson Deb Mangen From: dmswan2124 @aol.com Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 5:12 PM To: dmswan2124 @aol.com Subject: Subdivision of lot 6609 Blackfoot Pass My husband Dean and I live at 6617 Cheyenne Trail, two houses away from the proposed subdivision. We are totally and firmly against this subdivision for the following reasons. We bought our home in 1984 after looking for the home that captured our heart and fit the pocketbook. We lived in Burnsville for 22 years and this was to be our last move. 2. We bought, not so much for the house, but for the fabulous, wooded, natural landscaping in the neighborhood. We are tree huggers and totally for a green environment and this was it. Could not believe how lucky we were. 3. Over the years houses have been torn down and rebuilt, but for the most part the new people have respected our natural, green lots. 4. To start a precedent of dividing the original plotted lots, will be the beginning of changing this neighborhood with the essence of woods, large lots, many old oak trees in to a neighborhood that resembles many others in Edina. Right now, we have a distinct look that may forever be gone. 5. We look at the beautiful lot at 6609 Blackfoot Pass and love the beautiful irreplaceable trees. If this lot is allowed to be divided, we will be looking at green fertilized grass, sprinkling systems running down the street, landscape boulders and perhaps some "new ", perfect trees. Here are some photos I took while on a walk through the neighborhood to show how some lots are This is what we love We cry when we see all the trees cut down - on Indian Hies Kd Deb Mangen From: Michael Nallick <mbowzer @earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 12:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Southwest LRT Please direct to Mayor Hovland. Dear Mayor Hovland, Thank you for taking a serious look at the shallow tunnel through Kenilworth as a viable option. As a Kenilworth resident, I know a lot of us are fine with freight remaining in the corridor if LRT is mitigated within a shallow tunnel. It's a win for St Louis Park and a win for Minneapolis. Thanks, Mike Nallick Kenilworth/ CIDNA resident J � Deb Mangen From: Jean Colwell <jeancolweII13 @gmail.com> Sent Friday, September 06, 2013 9:53 AM To: Edina Mail Subject For Mayor Hovland, re: 54th Street Reconstruction Dear Jim, Last. night 21 neighbors who live along 54th street met and discussed our concerns up the up coming 54th street project. We are aware that on September 14 you will be in our neighborhood for the buckthorn invasion project at the creek. We are hoping that you will have 30. minutes sometimes before, during or after this to do a walking tour of 54th street with our neighbors. Please let me know if you are able and we will make ourselves available to you. Thank You, Jean Colwell 5401 OaklawnAve So 952- 913 -7127 .ieancolweII13@qmail.com 1 of life. There are concerns about the loss of boulevard trees and the loss of the quaint look of our neighborhood. We believe that a wider road would not be safe for our local residents. Narrow streets are calmer, discourage speedy traffic, and with fewer pavements it is more environmentally friendly. We would like to meet With all participants to discuss these concerns before any planning is done. LIVABLE STREET: SAFE, NARROW, AND QUAINT! Jean Colwell, Teri Whaley, and 20 other residents of 54th Street in Edina. z 0 Deb Mangen From: Jean Colwell <jeancolweII13 @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 9:53 AM To: Edina Mail; Cary Teague; Wayne. Houle; Anne Carroll; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Ann Swenson; Anne Jennen; Ann Kasid; Anne Epple; Carol Kaliebe; Dennis La France; Gary Hanus; Gloria Sullivan; Jamie Sullivan; Jim Grotz; John Adams; John Crabtree; Kathryn A Bennett; Kevin Green; Kris Ross; Lisa O'Brien; Lori Grom Lou Gilbert; Mark Epple; Mary Dykstra; Mary Ryder, Nancy Fergensen; Rick Fergensen; Shari La France; Steve Jennen; Steve Timmer, Teri Whaley, Tom Brower, Trudy Hanus Subject: 54th Street reconstruction On September 5th, 21 neighbors who live along 54th Street met at Teri Whaley's home at 5337 Wooddale Ave. Our goal for the evening was to arrive at a consensus about the re construction of 54th Street between France Avenue 5 and Wooddale Avenue. As residents,and taxpayers who will be the most affected by this project we feel that the City needs to listen to our concerns and input above anyone else. As neighbors we embrace the idea of "Local Control of Living Streets ". The main consensus at this meeting is that 54th Street does not become any wider. More specifically, consensus was reached about these following key issues, which were first presented to us at the meeting held August 19 at Calvin Christian Church. The 54th street resident consensus is: 1. The road is to stay with its current width, including any sidewalks, bike lanes, etc. Many residents have measured the road and it measures at different widths along 54th. The average width west of the creek is about 34 feet wide. 2. One sidewalk, if required, with no boulevard. 3. Share the road concept for bike lanes. If there has to be a designated bike lane we propose a shared bike lane using a share arrow concept 4. The Stop: sign at the Creek remains 5, No flashing lights, or traffic control lights 6. More traffic police presence to tame speeders. 7. The bridge design should be consistent to the feel and look of our neighborhood. Our homes were built in the 1930 and 40's and were placed closed to the street. Wider streets, flashing signs, and more pavements will affect our home values, and our quality 1 neighbors of this property. Today we were able to obtain the proposed site plan which proposes 3 homes on this lot after subdivision. Front setback requirements will require._that each home, be positioned at the back of each pie shaped lot leaving almost no' backyards for any of them. These lots are significantly wider along the street and smaller at the rear. Further troubling is that each home is positioned with only a 10 ft. side setback. This is not in keeping with our neighborhood aesthetics. The beauty and feeling of the neighborhood is greatly impacted by the fact that each home has some room around it and is not on top of the house next door. This is what attracted us to this neighborhood less than one year ago. We respectfully ask each of you to take a few minutes to come by this property before the meeting and have a look at what is being proposed. While we understand the Warner family's -wish to maximize their land's potential, we would hope that serious consideration will be given to the ramifications to the neighbors should this plan be approved as is. Perhaps the property could be subdivided into two lots allowing more room between the houses in,keeping':with the,feeling of the neighborhood. As the current proposal stands, most of the mature trees at the rear of the property will have to ibe cut down to make room for the new houses. Considering this there will not be much privacy for any of the houses if they are bunched together at the apex of this property. Counting our home, Mary Pohlad's home on the other side, and the three homes on the proposed subdivision Plat, there would be five homes in total, if approved. Thank you for your consideration and time. If you have any questions or would like to contact us please feel free to call the numbers below. Sandi & Mike Genau 6 Merilane Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Sandi © 410- 336 -9089 Mike © 210- 872 -0481 home 952- 405 -8682 From: mail @EdinaMN.gov To:.mdpartvof5@msn.com Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:01:45 +0000 Sandi and Mike, the meeting on the 11th is with the planning commission. They will take public input at that meeting. It is not yet on our city council schedule for a public hearing. I checked with Jackie in planning today. A three lot split does not need any variances and it would be hard to legally deny three hots in my opinion if they meet the neighborhood mean. While I understand the topography is tough and the front yard set back that you and the neighbor on the south have creates tight building pads in the rear, that is not a strong reason for denial. One thing to consider is a discussion on moving the building pads towards the street or asking for a new street that comes to the hill top and dead ends so the three houses face that circle. I have been to the site. It is a beautiful view. Ann Swenson, council Sent from my iPad From: M. Genau [mailto:mdpartyofSC @ msn.com] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:54 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Thank you very much! From: mail @EdinaMN.gov To:.mdpartvof5@msn.com Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:42:26 +0000 Dear Sandi and Mike, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members. if I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. /w���r,. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �@ r° r 952 - 927 -8861 I Fax 952 - 826 -0389 L ° IbiunnoCcDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: M. Genau rmailto:mdpartyof5 msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:56 PM To: Edina Mail; Mike Genau, Sr. Subject: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Dear Council Members, As you are probably aware, The Warner property on Merilane Avenue in Rolling Green is being presented for subdivision at the next Council meeting on September 11. We are immediate Deb Man en From: M. Genau <mdpartyof5 @msn.com> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 3:31 PM To: James Hovland Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Yes, I just looked that up. I'm disappointed that there is not more consideration given to the look and feel of each neighborhood. Perhaps no one ever thought that someone would consider building houses of this size within ten feet of the side lot lines. Again, thank you for your time and attention. From: JHovland @EdinaMN.gov To:' mdpartyof5 @msn.com Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:16:23 +0000 Side yard set back is 10 feet for any lot wider than 75 feet. Ann Swenson Sent from my iPad From: M. Genau [mailto:mdpartyof5 @msn.com] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013.1:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner..Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Ms. Swenson, Thank you for your reply. I am wondering where the 10 foot side setback comes from? I can't think of another scenario in this particular neighborhood where the houses are placed that close together. Isn't there any consideration for the style and aesthetics of the neighborhood ?' While it may be a beautiful view for the three who build on the Warner's site it will only be from the front doors. There will be no side yards, and hardly any back yards at all. We believe it will greatly impact our view and our property value. We are not opposed to subdividing the lot, but if you would come by and see just how close the rear corners of the proposed house for lot 1 is to our driveway I believe you would be shocked. Again, thank you for your consideration and time. If you do decide to have another look at where the homes are being proposed, please feel free to come onto my property if you need to. Sandi Genau 1 Deb Mangen From: jjlalim @comcast.net Sent Thursday, September 05, 2013 3:11 PM To: Edina Mail; Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Ann Swenson Subject Subdivision This letter is in response to a notice I received regarding the subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass, Edina. My property is: 6600 Blackfoot Pass. As can be seen in an old Indian Hills Directory, there is a boundary map of this area and each lot drawn by a Hennepin County Surveyor: Mr. Peterson. Let's.preserve-this beautiful community of well designed homes, large lots, winding roads, mature trees and thick foliage. It is my understanding that there are covenants and deed restrictions that apply to Indian Hills. Please do not ignore their importance, in' protecting the beauty and value of our neighborhood. Indian Hills is a small unique established community that makes "Edina Look Good ". I object to the subdivision of the property at 6609 Blackfoot Pass, Edina. Respectfully, Jewel Lalim lot leaving almost no backyards for any of them. These lots are significantly wider along the street and smaller at the rear. Further troubling is that each home is positioned with only a 10 ft. side setback. This is not in keeping with our neighborhood aesthetics. The beauty and feeling of the neighborhood is greatly impacted by the fact that each home has some room around it and is not on top of the house next door. This is what attracted us to this neighborhood less than one year ago. We respectfully ask each of you to take a few minutes to come by this property before the meeting and have a look at what is being proposed. While we understand the Warner family's wish to maximize their land's potential, we would hope that serious consideration will be given to the ramifications to the neighbors should this plan be approved as is. Perhaps the property could be subdivided into two lots allowing more room between the houses in keeping with the feeling of the neighborhood. As the current proposal 1 stands, most of the mature trees at the rear of the property will have to be cut down to make room for the new houses. Considering this there will not be much privacy for any of the houses if they are., bunched together at the apex of this property. Counting our home, Mary Pohlad's home on the other side, and the three homes on the proposed subdivision Plat, there would be five homes in total, if approved. Thank you for your consideration and time. If you have any questions or would like to contact us please feel free to call the numbers below. Sandi & Mike Genau 6`Merilane Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Sandi © 410 - 336 -9089 Mike © 210 - 872 -0481' home 952- 405 -8682 `Sandi and Mike, the meeting on the 11th is with the planning commission. They will take public input at that meeting. It is not yet on our city council schedule for a public hearing. I checked with Jackie in planning today. A three lot split does not need any variances and it would be hard to legally deny three lots in my opinion if they meet the neighborhood mean. While I understand the topography is tough and the front yard set back that you and the neighbor on the south have creates tight building pads in the rear, that is not a strong reason for denial. One thing to consider is a discussion on moving the building pads towards the street or. asking for a new street that comes to the hill top and dead ends so the three houses face that. circle. I have been to the site. It is a beautiful view. Ann Swenson, council Sent from my iPad From: M. Genau [mailto:mdpartyof5 @msn.com] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:54 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Thank you very much! From: mail EdinaMN.gov To: mdpartyof5C@msn.com Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:42:26 +0000 Dear Sandi and Mike, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist <lma e001. lf> 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 926 -0389 g g IbiunnopEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: M. Genau [mailto:mdpart oofS msn.coml Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:56 PM To: Edina Mail; Mike Genau, Sr. Subject: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Dear Council Members, As you are probably aware., The Warner property on Merilane Avenue in Rolling Green is being presented for subdivision at the next Council meeting on September 11. We are immediate neighbors of this property. Today we were able to obtain the proposed site plan which proposes 3 homes on this lot after subdivision. Front setback requirements will require that each home be positioned at the back of each pie shaped Deb Man en From: Ann Swenson <swensonannl @gmail.com> Sent Thursday, September 05, 2013 3:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Side yard set back is 10 feet for any lot wider than 75 feet. Sent from my Wad On Sep 5, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Edina Mail <mai1AE!naMN.9ov> wrote: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist <lma e001. lfy 952 -927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 926 -0389 g g Ibiunno(&EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN..qov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: M. Genau [mailto:mdpaMof5 @msn.com] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 1:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Ms. Swenson, Thank I you . for your reply. I am wondering where the 10 foot side, setback comes from? I can't think of another scenario in this particular neighborhood where the houses are placed that close together. Isn't there any consideration for the style and aesthetics of the neighborhood? While it may be a beautiful view for the three who build on the Warner's site it will only be from the front doors. There will be no side yards, and hardly any back yards at all. We believe it Will greatly impact our view and our property value. We are not opposed to subdividing the lot, but if you would come by and see just how close the rear corners of the proposed house for lot 1 is to our driveway I believe you would be shocked. Again, thank you for your consideration and time. If you do decide to have another look at where the homes are being proposed, please feel free to come onto my property if you need to. Sandi Genau From: mail EdinaMN.gov To: mdpartyof5@msn.com Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:01:45 +0000 Sandi.& Mike Genau 6 Merilane Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Sandi © 410 - 336 -9089 Mike © 210 - 872 -0481 home 952 -405 -8682 Thank you very much! From: maii(@EdinaMN.gov To: mdpartyof5@msn.com Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:42:26 +0000 Dear Sandi and Mike, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 h IbiunnoCob-EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov .` ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: M.hGenau [mailto•mdpartvof5 msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:56 PM To: Edina Mail; Mike Genau, Sr. Subject: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Dear Council Members, As you are probably aware, The Warner property on Merilane Avenue in Rolling Green is being presented for subdivision at the next Council meeting on September 11. We are immediate neighbors of this property. Today we were able to obtain the proposed site plan which proposes 3 homes on this lot after subdivision. Front setback requirements will require that each home be positioned at the back of each pie shaped lot leaving almost no backyards for any of them. These lots are significantly wider along the street and smaller at the rear. Further troubling is that each home is positioned with only a 10 ft. side setback. This is not .in keeping with our neighborhood aesthetics. The beauty and feeling of the neighborhood is greatly impacted by the fact that each home has some room around it and is not on top of the house next door. This is what attracted us to this neighborhood less than one year "ago. We respectfully ask each of you to take a few minutes to come by this property before the meeting and have a look at what is being proposed. While we understand the Warner family's wish to maximize their land's potential, we would hope that serious consideration will be given to the ramifications to the neighbors should this plan be approved as is. Perhaps the property could be subdivided into two lots allowing more room between the houses in keeping with the feeling of the neighborhood. As the current proposal stands, most of the mature trees at the rear of the property will have to be cut down to make room for the new houses. Considering this there will not be much privacy for any of the houses if they are bunched together at the apex of this property. Counting our home, Mary Pohlad's home on the other side, and the three homes on the proposed subdivision Plat, there would be five homes in total, if approved. Thank you for your consideration and time. If you have any questions or would like to contact us please feel free to call the numbers below. Deb Mangen From: M. Genau <mdpartyof5 @msn.com> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 1:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Ms. Swenson, Thank you for your reply. I am wondering where the 10 foot side setback comes from? I can't think.of another scenario in this particular neighborhood where the houses are placed that close together. Isn't there any consideration for the style and aesthetics of the neighborhood? While it may be a beautiful view for the three who build on the Warner's site it will only be from the front doors. There will be no side yards, and hardly any back yards at all. We believe it will. greatly impact our view and our property value. We are not opposed to subdividing the lot, but if you would come by and see just how close the rear corners of the proposed house for lot 1 is to our driveway I believe you would be shocked. Again, thank you for your consideration and time. If you do decide to have another look at where the homes are being proposed, please feel free to come onto my property if you need to. Sandi Genau From: mail @EdinaMN.gov To.: mdpartyof5 @msn.com Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:01:45 +0000 Sandi and Mike, the meeting on the 11th is with the planning commission. They will take public input at that meeting. It is not yet on our city council schedule for a public hearing. I checked with Jackie in planning today. A three lot split does not need any variances and it would be hard to legally deny three lots in my opinion if they meet the neighborhood mean. While I understand the topography is tough and the front yard set back that you and the neighbor on the south have creates tight building pads in the rear, that is not a strong reason for denial. One thing to consider is a discussion on moving the building pads towards the street or asking for a new street that comes to the hill top and dead ends so the three houses face that circle. I have been to the site. It is a beautiful view. Ann Swenson, council Sent from my iPad From: M. Genau [mailto:mdpartyof5 @msn.com] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:54 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina current proposal stands, most of the mature trees at the rear of the property will have to be cut down to make room for the new houses. Considering this there will not be much privacy for any of the houses if they are bunched together at the apex of this property. Counting our home, Mary Pohlad's home on the other side, and the three homes on the proposed subdivision Plat,.there would be five homes in total, if approved. Thank you for your consideration and time. If you have any questions or would like to contact us please feel free to call the numbers below. Sandi & Mike Genau 6 Merilane Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Sandi © 410- 336 -9089 Mike © 210- 872 -0481 home 952 -405 -8682 Deb Mangen From: Ann Swenson <swensonannl @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:53 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Sandi and Mike, the meeting on the 11th is with the planning commission. They will take public input at that meeting. It is not yet on our, city council schedule for a public hearing. I checked with Jackie in planning today. A three lot split does not need any variances and it would be hard to legally deny three lots in my opinion if they meet the neighborhood mean. While I understand the topography is tough and the front yard set back that you and the neighbor on the south have creates tight building pads in the rear, that is not a strong reason for denial. One thing to consider is a discussion on moving the building pads towards the street or asking for a new street that comes to the hill top and dead ends so the three houses face that circle. I have been to the site. It is a beautiful view. Ann Swenson, council Sent from my iPad On Sep 5, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Edina Mail <mail@EdinaMN.goy> wrote: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist <lma e001. lfy 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 g g Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business .From: M. Genau [mailto:mdpartyof50)msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:56 PM To: Edina Mail; Mike Genau, Sr. Subject: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Dear Council Members, As you are probably aware, The Warner property on Merilane Avenue in Rolling Green is being presented for subdivision at the next Council meeting on September 11. We are` rnmediate neighbors of this property. Today we were able to obtain the proposed site plan which proposes 3 homes on this lot after subdivision. Front setback req "uirements will require that each home be positioned at the back of each pie shaped lot leaving almost no backyards for any of them. These lots are significantly wider along the street and smaller at the rear. Further troubling is that each home is positioned with only a 10 ft. side setback. This is not in keeping with our neighborhood aesthetics. The beauty and feeling of the neighborhood is greatly impacted by the fact that each home has some room around it and is not on top of the house next door. This is what attracted us to this neighborhood less than one year ago. We respectfully ask each of you to take a few minutes to come by this property before the meeting and have a look at what is being proposed. While we understand the Warner family's wish to maximize their land's potential, we would hope that serious consideration will be given to the ramifications to the neighbors should this plan be approved as is. Perhaps the property could be subdivided into two lots allowing more room between the houses in keeping with the feeling of the neighborhood. As the Deb Mangen From: M. Genau <mdpartyof5 @msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:56 PM To: Edina Mail; Mike Genau, Sr. Subject: Proposal for Subdivision of Warner Estate, Rolling Green, Edina Dear Council Members, As you are probably aware, The Warner property on Merilane Avenue in Rolling Green is being presented for subdivision at the next Council meeting on September 11. We are immediate neighbors of this property. Today we were able to obtain the, proposed site plan which proposes 3 homes on this lot after subdivision. Front setback requirements will require that each home. be positioned at the back of each pie shaped lot leaving almost no backyards for any of them. These lots are significantly wider along the street and smaller at the rear. Further troubling is that each home is positioned with only a 10 ft. side setback. This is not in keeping with our neighborhood aesthetics. The beauty and feeling of the neighborhood is greatly impacted by the fact that each home has some room around it and is not on top of the house next door. This is what attracted us to this neighborhood less than one year ago. We respectfully ask each of you to take a few minutes to come by this property before the meeting and have a look at what is being-,proposed.. While we understand the Warner family's wish to maximize their land's potential, we would hope that serious consideration will be given to the ramifications to the neighbors should this,.plan be approved as is. Perhaps the property could be subdivided into two lots allowing more room between the houses in keeping with the feeling of the neighborhood. As the current proposal stands; most of the mature trees at the rear of the property will have to be cut down to make room for the new houses. Considering this there will not be much privacy for any of the houses if they are bunched together at the apex of this property. Counting our home, Mary Pohlad's home on the other side, and the three homes on the proposed, subdivision Plat, there would be five homes in total, if approved. Thank you for your consideration and time. If you have any questions or would like to contact us please feel free to call the numbers below. Sandi & Mike Genau 6 Merilane Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Sandi @ 410 - 336 -9089 Mike @ 210 - 872 -0481 home 952 - 405 -8682 a a Deb Mangen From: news @gmcc.org Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 1:42 PM To: philrice @ci.anoka.mn.us; tryan @ci.blaine.mn.us; gwinstead @ci.bloomington.mn.us; mayorwillson@ci.brooklyn - center.mn.us; jeffrey.lunde @brooklynpark.org; elizabeth.kautz @ci.burnsville.mn.us; thowe@coonrapidsmn.gov,- jim.adams @crystalmn.gov; ntyra- lukens @edenprairie.org; Edina Mail; scott.lund @fridleymn.gov, mlittle @lakevillemn.gov; will .rossbach @ci.maplewood.mn.us; rt@minneapolis.org; joe.flaherty @ci.mounds- view.mn.us; mike.kuehn@ci.north- saint - paul.mn.us; kslavik @plymouthmn.gov, sstrommen @ci.ramsey.mn.us; citycouncil @cityofrichfield.org; sandymartin444 @gmail.com;jjacobs1956 @yahoo.com; cjohnson @ci.watertown.mn.us; jzanmiller @cityofwsp.org; kevin.reich @minneapolismn.gov, cam.gordon @minneapolismn.gov, diane .hofstede @minneapolismn.gov, Barbarajohnson @minneapolismn.gov, don.samuels @minneapolismn.gov; Robert.lilligren @minneapolismn.gov; lisa.goodman @minneapolismn.gov; elizabeth .glidden @minneapolismn.gov; gary.schiff @minneapolismn.gov, meg.tuthill @minneapolismn.gov; John.Quincy @minneapolismn.gov, Sandra .colvin.roy @minneapolis.gov, betsy.hodges @minneapolis.gov; wardl @ci.stpaul.mn.us; ward2 @ci.stpaul.mn.u; ward3 @ci.stpaul.mn.us, ward4@ci.stpaul.mn.us; ward5 @ci.stpaul.mn.usl; ward6 @ci.stpaul.mn.us; ward? @ci.stpaul.mn.us Subject: We want to thank you personaly Volunteers in your community have made a difference by painting the homes of low- income seniors and those with disabilities for 30 years, and we think this deserves a celebration. Please join us for an open house`to celebrate Metro Paint -A- Thon's 30 years of serving the community. You will enjoy light snacks and beverages with a running slide show of the various projects over the years. You'll get to meet staff, other volunteers and we're even hoping to get a few home owners there to share their personal perspective on the impact you've made. Join us Tuesday, September 24, 4 to 6 p.m. Paint -A -Thon headquarters Center for Families building [http: / /r20.rs6. net/ tn. jsp? e= 001axFxCvgmkGy_ SH6FNCQxgFrJLXyBT2e5xGiiTtA6FS8DYHFriXuKMbolHNMfnNcWPbzWn5 vlbtkzU7YsZkkcLcxl BCwdsX9zW iSTWr3a UOz49DUb8uG NKyUgQhwcbgV4M6PO- YG2Jyw =] 3333 North Fourth Street Minneapolis, MN 55412 Email your RSVP by September 18 to Molly Chandler [mchandler @gmcc.org] or call (612)276 -1579. Hope to see you there! Metro Paint -A -Thon Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches 1001 East Lake Street P.O. Box 7509 Minneapolis, MN 55407 Since 1984, Metro Paint -A -Thon volunteers have completed more than 6,300 projects across the Twin Cities metro area. Metro Paint- A -T.hon is one of a family of human service programs of the Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches (GMCC). Focusing on helping seniors, empowering urban American Indians, nurturing healthy families, fighting hunger and mentoring youth, GMCC is a nonprofit where compassion has inspired action since 1905. For more information, visit www.gmcc.org Y .. 4. Kenilworth Trail preserved within corridor for longterm. This should state that the Kenilworthtiorrid.00r will be closed to bicyclists and pedestrians for 2 to 3 years, diverting these users to city streets. It should be listed as a weakness. The weaknesses shown include: 1. 21st station eliminated. For only 1000 riders a week, it should be eliminated to speed up the journey from Eden Prairie to the U of Mn, the airport and MCA, which already goes by way of Robin Hood's barn around the garbage burner. Who is going to ride the SWLRT of these destinations when they could drive in half the time or less? . 2. Temporary detour of Kenilworth trail. ,Most of the 500,000 trail users would think that this is too long a diversion to city streets. Bad for recreation; bad for businesses. and should include: 3. Loss of mature trees, 1000 of them in the corridor. The replanting in the 4 -5 foot wide restored green strip between the trails and the Calhoun Isles tower will take decades for the trees to reach maturity and will eventually invade the shallow tunnel (unless the plans are to replant shallow rooted shrubs (like buckthorn). 4. Excessive noise, visibility, dust and vibration during construction (which a deep tunnel would not entail). 5. The shallow tunnel would not,enter the portal until it was even with the second lane of the Cedar Lake Shores townhomes. Art Higinbotham CAC Rep, W. Lake St. station (where is the CAC when public commentary at meetings is foreclosed: ?) 2 Deb Mangen From: arthur higinbotham <ahiginbotham @msn.com> Sent Wednesday, September 04, 2013 1:40 PM To: Edina Mail Subject FW: SWLRT Deep Tunnel Option Attachments: bluemanm[1].png For Mayor Hovland's attention. From: ahiginbotham@msn.com To: susan.haigh @metc.state.mn.us CC: Peter. mclaughlin @ co. hen nepin.mn.us; peter. rogoff@dot.gov; peter .wagenius @ci.minneapolis.mn.us; gail.dorfman co.hennepin.mn.us; mark.fuhrmann @metrotransit.org; stuart @chaiingroup.com; imcolbv earthlink :net,•.mikeeriandson @gmail.com; nancygreenl @comcast.net; cwreg@msn.com sfitzmau tcfbank.com; lisa.goodman ci.minneapolis.mn.us; dlilly @danburygroup.com� rep. frank. hornstein @ house.mn; sen.scott.dibble @ senate.mn; rt@minneapolis.org; ieff.r.iohnson co.hennepin.mn.us; eldoniohn @hotmail.com; megf @visi.com; billbevan70 @gmail.com; horizongreen @comcast.net; birasmus @comcast.net; ian.nielsen6l @gmail.com; loratruckenbrod @ hotmail.com; mamccoy @mmm.com, info @cidna.org; stan @umn.edu; marshaif @gmail.com; douglasipeterson.dip @gmail.com; mnrealtors @aol.com Subject: SWLRT Deep Tunnel Option Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 18:37:09 +0000 As an observer at today's SW Corridor Management Committee meeting, it was saddening to see the option for a deep LRT tunnel option off the table; the decision was based on cost, without examination of the Project Office estimates, which are totally out of line with the cost of a comparable tunnel underneath the airport. The presentation of the strengths and weaknesses for a shallow tunnel need to be challenged: The strengths shown include: 1. No acquisition of homes and business in the Kenilworth corridor. The temporary. relocation of the freight rail tracks closer to the Cedar Lake Shores property line to dig the shallow tunnel and move back to the current position once the tunnel is complete will prompt the project office to encroach on Cedar Lake Shores property, destroying mature trees on the west side of the corridor. Freight rail will have to be relocated to SLP on the MN &S tracks while this dislocation occurs. 2. LRT daylights between the north and south tunnels for approximately 20 seconds per train. These daylights will amount to 488 feet of exposure of LRT to canoeists and kayakers on the Cedar Lake /Lake of the Isles channel -- including 95 feet of a new, third bridge which will make the passage under the bridge increase to 45 feet. How can this be called a strength? 3. West Lake St. Bridge preserved. The deep tunnel proposal calls for running the LRT in a shallow tunnel from the south end of the bridge to the north side; the shallow tunnel is no different! Deb Mangen From: Terry Luke <Terry_Luke @cargill.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 1:39 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: St. Louis Park, Southwest Light Rail Train and the Greater Good of Minnesota Dear James Hovland honorable Mayor for the City of Edina, Hello my name is Terry Luke and I support freight rail relocation through St. Louis Park. If the freight is relocated through St. Louis Park our family home will either be removed or the elevated track will run adjacent to our property, and we are fine either way. My family loves our home and our neighborhood dearly, but we understand that sometimes the greater good is what truly needs to be considered when choosing the best option. Please let me explain why. Thousands of residents in both Minneapolis and St. Louis Park have their quiet night sleep disrupted every night by blaring train horns. I have friends who count on the 3am train. They have lived near the Kenilworth train for years and now wake up every night at five minutes to 3am. The MN Spur Line also has some horn happy engineers, which is a very good because it saves lives. Minnesota statute legally includes quietude as a Minnesota State natural resource to be protected and preserved for future generations. A freight rail relocation decision by the Metropolitan Council would give many Minnesotans back one of their most precious resources: quietude ... a resource they've forgotten the've even lost. And it preserves some of Minnesota's most utilized and beautiful park and recreational trails, recently nominated as 2nd best bike trail in the nation, a national treasure. It's.a win -win for Minnesota. Upgrading and elevating the freight rail line through St. Louis Park is the safest decision the Metropolitan Council could ever make. Brand new rail line infrastructure and straighter tracks make for safer trains. Kenilworth freight and MN Spur Line rail traffic have multiple street grade crossings; that is NOT safe. Elevating and consolidating the freight traffic through St. Louis Park eliminates crossings and that statistically saves lives. And I believe St. Louis Park has done a great job of articulating exactly how important safety is to the park. have two children in the St. Louis Park School system. One of them attends the PSI school and we know that the school will move the children to Cedar Manor if freight is relocated. So the freight will n"ot run by an elementary school, it will be .a community center only. The City of St. Louis Park has purchased land near the proposed light rail at elevated prices, in anticipation of rising property values. Would the city really risk losing $750,000 (overpayment amount) by withholding municipal consent if freight relocation is recommended? These factors are certainly worth bearing in mind as Minnesota thinks about best option forall of Minnesota. Although my family would hate to lose our house and a wonderful neighborhood, and living'adjacent to freight rail is no picnic, we understand that sometimes it's about the Greater Good of Minnesota and we support freight relocation through St. Louis Park. Sincerely, Terry Luke I Deb Manaen From: Joel Stegner <joel.r.stegner @gmail.com> ent: Friday, September 13, 2013 3:39 PM o: Edina Mail Subject: Unfavorable publicity about Edina I'm attaching an article from today's Star Tribune that doesn't reflect well on Edina, although such a thing could and does happen everywhere. I'll make a brief comment at the end of the article. Shamed in Edina for using food stamps • Article by SUE BULGER • Updated: September 12; 2013 - 8:03 PM To the irritated lady at the Cub Foods, I should have told you to your face that you were being presumptuous. • comments • 0 resize text €i • print • uy reprints • 1 This is an apology to the lady behind me in line at Cub Foods inEdina on a recent Sunday night. This is also a reminder to me and to others who have ever slipped into believing that we are just a little better than others we encounter. We were at the checkout, and just as the cashier started ringing me up, I saw you come to the line with a small order in your basket. My first apology is that I could not let you go ahead of me, but the checkout process had already begun. My second apology was for pulling out my pile of discount coupons for the order, and especially when one required the manager's assistance. I know I was holding you up. And then I swiped my payment method and you lost your patience. It was EBT — "food stamps. I did not observe you, but my daughter was with me packing the groceries and saw it all: "EBT: Yeah, right," you muttered, with that look of disgust that would have shattered someone feeling just a little bit of shame over needing food stamps. As we walked to the car, my daughter told me what had happened, and I sensed her resolve about having made the right decision to work for social justice as she starts her senior year in a social -work program. We talked about you all the way to the car, and about how sorry we felt for people who were judged because they depended on support from others. But my real apology is that I did not make eye contact with you and get out of the car to talk with you as you got into your car right next to mine. Instead, I did what many people would do: I felt ashamed and humiliated and angry about your ignorance If I'd had the guts to talk with you, I would have told you about my disabled 28- year -old son living with us. We have never asked for public support for him. But recently we have decided that it is our responsibility to introduce him to the programs that will have to support him when we are no longer here to care for him. We started small: He is eligible for food support, and he agreed to receive it to be able to feel that he is contributing his share to the food bill, since he is unable to work. I know we looked like people you might think need EBT: a bit unkempt in sweatpants and T- shirts. If I'd had the guts to talk to you, I would have told you that I'd just had an emergency surgery and that my daughter came home from college five hours away to help for the weekend because my husband had scheduled surgery two days after mine. I haven't been able to put on real clothes yet, and I can't lift a bag of groceries. I thought I could handle your disdain, since I am a professional working at a local corporation where I am surrounded every day by people who respect me and care about me. But it still made me feel a little dirty — unworthy — and I still went home and cried in the privacy of my shower so my family would not know I was hurt by you. I am sorry I did not tell you all of this in person. What my daughter and I resolved is that we will never let my son (her brother) go to the store alone with his Electronic Benefits Transfer card and be subjected to this humiliation. We all have our stories, and no one is any better than another. Everyone deserves the respect they want for themselves, even if they use an EBT card to pay for their groceries. Sue Bulger lives in Minneapolis. Of course, this story supports the popular notice that Edina residents have an attitude of superiority towards others. While this kind of attitude is commonly expressed by people of different races, as our difficult economy forces more people who are unemployed, underemployed or employed in low wage jobs, a record number of Americans are using food stamps. There are a lot of people in our society today who have lost patience with the poor, blame them for their poverty and are not supportive of adequate funding for programs such as food assistance. It is clearly most difficult for those who have never directly experienced poverty to really understand what it is all about. I believe that to the degree that Edina wants to be a advocate of human rights and fair treatment of all people, it needs to help its residents develop a better understanding and more acceptance of the impoverished people who live in our community. Poverty isn't always obvious to people, except when they use public benefits. Given the instability of our employment market and the astronomical costs of healthcare, anyone who experiences job loss or serious illness can quickly be plunged into poverty. While such an issue you might wish to turf to the Human Rights and Relations Commission, it, might be worth some discussion at the level fo the City Council. I also believe that one could easily use your recent Quality of Life survey to determine whether Edina residents who are racial /ethnic minorities or who are showing signs of economic distress are growing in number and might be explaining the somewhat lower overall quality of life scores in the 2013 than the 2011 survey. Thanks, Joel Stegner 6312 Cahill Road 1C Edina, MN 55435 952 - 843 -3440 Deb Mangen From: Ruth Tripp <rmstripp @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 3:31 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Ruth Tripp Subject: Bikes on sidewalks - 50th & France - Attn: City Council, Health, Transportation and Planning Dear Edina Mayor Hovland, City Council and Staff, I wanted to share an observation I made as one who enjoys going to the movie at 50th & France, which I did a couple weeks ago. I'm also aware the City is reviewing many of it's policies and is planning an education campaign as it supports a healthy community, one where it is easy to be active - so wanted to bring this to your attention. After seeing a movie at the Landmark theater we went to Mozza Mia to sit in their outdoor area for a refreshment. While there, I observed a man with 3 -4 children riding bikes on the sidewalk and one of the boys got hit by the the restaurant door as the waiter came out to serve food in the outdoor dining area. He was knocked down and off his bike and had an injury. The waiter felt terrible and later shared with us that the real problem was it happens nearly every day. I believe Edina has a 'no biking on sidewalk' ordinance which some would like to overturn as it may reflect negatively on biking, and some believe sidewalks may be the safest spot to ride, particularly for children. When it comes to a busy commercial area such as 50th & France with numerous pedestrians and out door dining, it seems prudent for everyone's safety to have this policy in place and visible through warnings in the area. In some Mpls. neighborhoods this is done with the'no biking' circles painted on the sidewalk. I don't believe this sends a negative message about biking when used in busy commercial areas but rather a message of safety. The symbol could have 'Walk bikes for everyone's safety' or a similar message under the symbol. Support education can be provided about the importance of walking your bike in busy areas. I am also sending a note to the 50th & France business association to bring this to their attention as well. Thank you for your consideration. Ruth Tripp Minneapolis, MN rmstripl)Qgmail.com 1 Deb Manaen From: Park, Steve J LTC USARMY I CORPS (US) <stevej.park3.mil @mail.mil> ent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 9:24 PM .o: Edina Mail Cc: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Hooten Cleaners, 3944 W. 49 1/2 Street Mayor Hovland & Edina City Counsel Members (Ms. Bennett, Ms. Brindle, Mr. Sprague, Ms. Swenson), I, Lieutenant Colonel Steve J. Park, West Point Class of 1994, am the eldest son of The Park's, serving on Active Duty in the US Army, and cannot make this re- scheduled meeting in regards to my parent's property located at 3944 W 49 1/2 Street, in the heart of the Edina business district. I would like to be brief, to the point, and conclude. First, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the said property in question, is of great monetary and business value. It would also make sense for a business owner, transitioning from business owner to property manager, to have to close the first to start the second in that transition. Secondly, Mr. Bill Neuendorf, the Economic Development Manager, has presented a false report/recommendation presented in front of you, for your approval, to use eminent domain as a pre -text to obtaining my parent's private business property. Specifically, he has used slight -of -hand tactics in his previous communications with my parents concerning the future of he property when my parents were still operating Hooten Cleaners and also making arrangements for building renovations to accommodate the two business negotiated leases. It appears he gave the appearance that they could proceed on with their plans to become property managers, and as soon as my parents decided to close the well - established successful business to proceed onto building renovations, he used that moment of business closure for the initiation of the eminent domain proceedings and he may have been part of the city's declination of the needed building /construction permits to proceed on with the necessary renovations. It is no wonder the required initial public hearing concerning this property was overlooked, as required by law. Let me be clear, Hooten Cleaners did not go out of business due to any financial reasons or any other liquidity issues. The decisions were set based on communications between Mr. Neundorf and my parents to proceed on with my parent's plans to become property managers with the two leases in hand. Mr. Neundorf also stated to my parents there was no longer interest in my parent's properly as the future parking plans to expand could go the other direction, towards the recently acquired Edina Reality building, on the other side of the parking ramp in question, to the east. This location could provide 180 of 200 parking spaces desired by the city, according to a city study. That would mean, eminent domain for the Hooten Cleaner's building is for 20 parking spaces ?! I again will let the Park's legal team handle this, if that is the justification. Therefore, in the Report/ Recommendation, Para 1, of Information /Background, the term "retired and closed the Hooten Dry Cleaning business..." and in HRA Resolution No. 2013 -13, "WHEREAS, the business owners have closed..." is a false statement when put into context. The building /property was in transition. It was in transition from being a service based business to a property management based business until the building permits for renovations were held up by the City of Edina to allow these proceedings to be initiated /recommended by Mr. Neuendorf to yourselves. Funds were also available to renovate said building for two new businesses, which would have paid taxes, income Edina would receive. In 2006, when Governor Pawlenty signed Senate File 2750 to protect homes, small businesses, and farms into law, the 3w requires property to be blighted in order to be condemned. The building is in nearly the same condition as it was when it was open as Hooten Cleaners, minus the property inside. I will let my parent's legal team address the term "blighted" when and if the time arises to address that legal matter as it affects the ability of the proceedings to go on. If so, a number of recovery fees in compensation for the property owner from the municipality comes into play. In conclusion, I ask you this, is the spirit of the eminent domain clause being presented to you clear; free of ill - intent or manipulation, and a part of what I represent when wearing the uniform of the U.S. Army in combat? My parent's property is hardly for a new expansion of HWY 100 or I -494 going through downtown Edina. Please think about your responsibilities and dig inside .your conscience when deciding where to go next with Mr. NeundorPs recommendations of taking 38 years of very hard work from my parents. The way the above mentioned business positioning and un- truthfulness of working the system is at best un- American, unfriendly to family owned businesses, and truly pure slime. Is that what the City of Edina represents and be known for? If you did not know this was happening, please vote to right this wrong on Tuesday evening's meeting. Thank.you for your time and consideration. 2 Deb Mangen From: George Hadjiyanis <george.hadjiyanis @enstratius.com> Sent Sunday, September 15, 2013 10:41 PM ;0: Edina Mail; Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject Thanks You / Braemar Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland and Honorable City Council Members Bennett and Brindle I want to thank you for your support of the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club and to cautiously make changes to the ice time allocation to not negatively affect the status of the skating club. If more time would have been eliminated, it would definitely have potentially altered the course of the clubs future. We have begun transitioning to the new structure and my daughter has been splitting the time between Bloomington Ice Gardens and Braemar (although we would much prefer to have the time back at Braemar of course). I recently read the information about the potential sports dome and ice sheet that will be reviewed this fall and support that plan to help ease the ice challenge during the peak part of the season. Also, my other daughter plays soccer and we take her to Holy Angels in the winter for training and I always wished there was an Edina option for that training. Thanks again and I look forward to hearing updates on this going forward. George Hadjiyanis 5608 St. Andrews Avenue Edina, MN 55424 952 - 922 -4957 TO: Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) CC: Jim Hovland, Mayor of Edina Joni Bennett; City Council Member FR: Resident of Edina 5605 Chowen Avenue South DT: August 9, 2013 RE: Increased airport noise It has taken me a long time to write you. As a person whose personality tends to be calm and reasoned, I feel a responsibility to finally say something! I believe this airport noise above my home has become a detriment to my property value. I have lived in Edina 3 times since moving to Minnesota in 1979 -twice as a renter and now as a homeowner (since 2000). 4 am located on the eastern side of town presently, but have lived in the western portion as well. Although I work long hours in another location,.I find that even having friends over to the back yad or:trying to sleep (sometimes),-past 5:30 a . is interrupted by the flight path. CONSTANT is how it feels. This noise can go on for over a solid hour. ,SOLID. We have been told that new flight paths have not YET been used, but this is truly intolerable.. I am an early;riser and yet I;find the `chance to hear early morning birds sing instead of the push. of - takeoff, has faded to almost never. PLEASE ADJUST YOUR PATH. I DID NOT PURCHASE A HOME AT ANOTHER LOCATION THAT HAD THIS ISSUE. I CHOSE THIS LOCATION INTENTIONALLY TO. AVOID IT. Very Concerned citize Bette V. Englund 5605 Chowen Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 SEAL 'I SEP 17 2013 TO: Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) CC: Jim Hovland; Mayor of Edina /Joni Bennett; City Council Member FR: Resident of Edina 5605 Chowen Avenue South DT: August 9, 2013 RE: Increased airport noise It has taken me a long time to write you. As a person whose personality tends to be calm and reasoned, I feel a responsibility to finally say something! I believe this airport noise above my home has become a detriment to my property value. I have lived in Edina 3 times since moving to Minnesota in 1979 -twice as a renter and now as a homeowner (since 2000). I am located on the eastern side of town presently, but have lived in the western portion as well. Although I work long hours in another location, I find that even having friends over to the back yard or trying to sleep (sometimes) past 5:30 a.m. is interrupted by the flight path. CONSTANT is how it feels. This noise can go on for over a solid hour. SOLID. We have been told that new flight paths have not YET been used, but this is truly intolerable. I am an early riser and yet I find the chance to hear early morning birds sing instead of the push of a takeoff, has faded to almost never. PLEASE ADJUST YOUR PATH. I DID NOT PURCHASE A HOME AT ANOTHER LOCATION THAT HAD THIS ISSUE. I CHOSE THIS LOCATION INTENTIONALLY TO AVOID IT. Very Concerned citizen, Bette . Englund 5605 Chowen Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 �G1TY C SE#-L SEP 17 2013 Deb Manaen From: Justin Hansen <justin52797 @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:52 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Golf course I would like to put in word that Fred Richards golf course should be saved. I enjoy that golf course very much and so does my family. I would be very disappointed to see it go. Please consider saving it! Thank you! :) Sent from my Whone 1 Deb Mangen From: jtmayl0 @comcast.net ant: Monday, September 16, 2013 9:54 PM o: Edina Mail Cc: Jeff Northrup; rdowda @hotmail.com; Sean Faeth Subject: Letter of Support for Sports Dome Attachments: EBA ESC_ EdinaDomeLetter_12Sepl3Final.pdf Please forward this letter to Ann Kattreh, the members of the Park Board, and the members of the City Council. Attached is a letter of support authored by the Edina Soccer Club and the Edina Baseball Association. Please contact us if you have any questions. September 12, 2013 Ms. Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ann — We would like to thank you for your partnership and support'of the Edina Dome initiative and of Edina's youth athletic programs. There has been clear progress with respect to the Dome considerations, and we are encouraged by the most recent Edina City Council working sessions. Coming out of that working session on August 20, members of the Edina Soccer Club (ESC) and Edina Baseball Association (EBA) were left with the impression that the preferred funding mechanism for the Dome would be one that is.patterned after the Hornet's Nest-model. We have some serious concerns about this approach. Fully Dedicated to the Edina Dome As you know, ESC a,nd EBA have.worked together to build the level of commitment and support for the Dome that is necessary for this project to be successful at inception and over time., The ESC and EBA have worked together to develop a validated pro -forma financial and operating model that involves other Edina athletic associations and programs. This level of partnership between the various sports organizations is unprecedented in recent Edina history. Edina's athletic associations have worked within the confines and constraints of the respective organizational bylaws to commit to the Priority Access Fees that will be paid by our constituents. In addition, we have worked outside our organizations to develop. an operating plan that includes committed time allocations for each association, down to specific hours by week and per month. The financial commitments of Edina's private athletic associations total nearly $1.5 million in Priority Access Fees and $4.5 million in turf rentals over a 15 year period. We are fully dedicated to the success of the Dome — financially and otherwise — and want to see it become a reality for Edina residents. Funding Model Distinctions It is important to note, however, that the Dome initiative is markedly different from the Hornet's Nest project. As a result, the Dome's funding model should, necessarily, be divergent for two primary reasons — breadth of community usage and financial make -up of athletic organizations. First, the Hornets Nest and the Dome have completely different target audiences for usage. The Dome is a project that will benefit every single resident of Edina. With a walking track around the perimeter, every reasonably healthy Edina resident will have the opportunity to benefit from the Dome. Of course, the School District, City and various Edina athletic organizations will also benefit by securing Dome time on behalf of constituents. The opportunity to promote a project that has such a broad reach is very rare in civic projects, and the broad -based benefits of the Dome contrast somewhat from the Hornet's Nest, which has a more narrowly defined impact for Edina residents. Ice - related sports may be the broader brush that could be painted, but many feel like the Hornet's Nest project had a much narrower , benefit and is not accessible for most Edina residents: In'many respects, development of the Dome is akin to building a year -round park for the city - an initiative that should not be delayed or curtailed by requirements associated with private funding. Second, we all know that hockey has a storied history in Edina and, therefore, has much deeper alumni pockets from which to draw additional private financial support. Without denigrating 'newer' sports like soccer, lacrosse, rugby, and ultimate frisbee, what pockets will they reach into for financial support? And yet these sports have seen tremendous growth in the last 10 years and need a Dome to appropriately serve Edina's youth. Notwithstanding the recent success of soccer, lacrosse and baseball, the small alumni bases for these sports.are not viable sources of funding. This is likely different than hockey given that it was well - established in Edina decades before some of these newer sports even existed at the high school level. Perhaps we can dip into the new alumni pockets in 40 years, but the potential for near -term financial support is simply not the same today as it could be some day in the future. We are hopeful,that the success of the Hornet's Nest funding model will not lead city officials to believe that similar funding mechanisms should be required for the Dome initiative. We are convinced that taking this approach to the Dome funding will result in the project being unnecessarily delayed or curtailed altogether. The Dome is important, and it is necessary, not simply for Edina's athletic associations, but more importantly to Edina's current residents and future prosperity. Again, thank you for your support and partnership. Best regards, Jeff May President, Edina Baseball Association Cc: Sean Faeth, Jeff Northrup Rick Dowda President, Edina Soccer Club Deb Manaen From: Peyton Robb <to- from @att.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:04 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Robb Tree Issue Attachments: sidewalk.pdf Peyton Robb 4812 Valley View Rd 612- 669 -2488 September 16, 2013 City Council: I am asking for your help with a property owner issue I have with the City Administration's policy. I am asking you to direct the city staff to pick -up tree debris from a branch that fell in the city's right of way, blocking my driveway. Two years ago the city installed a sidewalk on the city's right of way over my objections. My main concern was damage to the screening trees that were there(not planted in the right of way). I spoke to the Council as some may remember and warned that the trees would be damaged and one in particular a large silver maple was going to be a problem in the next few years. I had received an opinon letter from the City Forester Tom Horwath before the sidewalk was installed that he too had "concerns" about this tree (see attached). I have sent several e- mails, requesting the city to pick -up the debris, during the weeks following the falling of the branch at 5:30AM 8/20/13 (completely blocking my driveway and some of the sidewalk). I needed to be able to leave for an appointment that morning so I dragged the limb out of the way. Subsequently, I cut up the limb and piled the big pieces close to the street. Tom Horwath has been over on two occasions, to talk, each time refusing to pick -up the debris, based upon city policy. My point is that the tree was damaged by city action so why am I, the property owner, responsible for the disposal? Further, I found out from Tom that had I left the branch in the sidewalk the city would have come by at some point and removed all the debris! So much for being proactive! This entire situation leaves me wondering who is or is not responsible for what is in the right of way? Also, as a point of information the city's tree truck, with the clam shell pick -up arms, drives by my house seemingly, on a weekly basis so I am not out of the way, nor would my request represent a large cost to the City. I am hoping this issue will be resolved without taking up your valuable time at a Council Meeting Thank you for listening. I look forward to your response. Tom Honwath To: Peyton Robb Cc: Jim Hovland Subject: Sidewalk/Vegetation concerns To: Mr. Peyton Robb 4812 Valley View Rd. From: Thomas Horwath Edina City Forester Dear Mr. Robb I was happy to meet with you Mon, Oct. 11 at your home to review and discuss the sidewalk construction taking place next year and the potential effects such construction may have on.your existing trees bordering the area where such construction will take.place. You showed me the areas of proposed excavations and I left with a relatively good grasp of the amount and proximity of such construction, as well as an inspection of the existing trees — species, approximate ages, sizes and observable health status. As I mentioned to you on site, the predictable responses of the trees during and after construction can fluctuate a great deal., i will still offer you my professional opinions and suggestions. From my previous observations of similar construction activities— sidewalks in particular, t have witnessed such low observable harmful effects to trees in situations such as yours. Excavation depths required for sidewalk construction are generally shallow and thus root loss is minimal. I counted eight Spruce trees on your border which are very close to the proposed excavation limits. Some are closer than others and the sizes differed, though, as you informed me they were all close to the same age. I suspect that the smaller ones are somewhat less healthy and may be more susceptible to any problems created by construction. The healthier trees can, of course, recover better after construction is complete. It is my opinion that some of these trees wilkbe impacted more than others. I suggest you plan for replacement of some of them, but not all. I recommend, to achieve an even better desired screen from future sidewalk and street use that several well chosen varieties of low growing evergreens could be planted between the existing Spruce trees. If any of the trees suffer to much health problems, this proactive approach would remediate such problems in the future. As for the large Silver Maple along this line; I would have concerns about the :health and public safety risk it may pose after going through the amount of root severance that may have to be necessary by the construction proposals you were made aware of, and informed me of. The age and observable health conditions I witnessed, and the proximity to the sidewalk has led me to this advice. I hope this helps. If you have any further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Susan Howl From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:19 PM To: ED Everyone; Ann Swenson; James Hovland Ohovland @krausehovland.com); Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: JULY Website Report Hello! Now that the Communications & Technology Services Department is nearly fully staffed, we're starting to catch up! Here's the website report for July. Total visits: 92;314 Number of unique visitors: 63,096 Average time of each visit: 2 minutes, 15 seconds Total page views: 270,497 Nearly 54 percent of visitors came just one time. About 46 percent visited more often. Besides the home page, the most visited page was the Edina Aquatic Center home page with 15,382 page views. Other top pages included the following (with number of page views): Centennial Lakes Park — 14,789 - Braemar Golf Course — 14,673 Aquatic Center General Information — 10,422 Edinborough -Park — 6,954 Centennial Lakes Park Attractions — 6,761 Centennial Lakes Park Arts &Events 5,882 CentennialLakes Park Calendar— 5,671 Braemar.:Golf,Course Rates — 3,966 Aquatic: Center Attractions — 3,751 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the March 4, 2013 Crime report. Other frequently downloaded files included the following: Park facilities flap Summer 2013 About Town City Code Section 850 (Zoning Code) Fire Department Information Sheet on Fires or Barbecues on Balconies and Patios Wednesday Softball Playoffs City Code Section 1504 (Heritage Preservation Board) March 25, 2013 Crime Report Community street map City Code Section 450 (Swimming Pools) The most popular blog category was the Parks & Recreation Department, followed by City Manager Scott Neal's and Police Chief Jeff Long's blogs. The most popular blog posts were "A Modern Day Lynching," "The Loss of Two Edina Legends," "Edina PD Discontinuing Access of Driver's License Photos," "Why We Leave Our Squad Cars Running," and "Love is in the Air at Centennial Lakes Park." The terms people uses to find our site were "city of edina," "braemar golf," "edina aquatic center," "centennial lakes," "edina pool," "braemar golf course," "edinborough park," "edina water park," "edina mn" and "edina art center." The most searche for words or phrases people used once people arrived at our site were "fireworks," "zoning map," "jobs," "rosland park," "wedding," "zoning," "parade," "weddings," "mini golf" and "recycling." Speak Up, Edina Activity on the "Speak Up, Edina" website reflected the following activity during the month of July 2013: Total visits: 600 Number of unique visitors: 375 Average time of each visit: 2 minutes, 54 seconds Total page views: 1,936 More than 63.5 percent of visitors came just one time. About 46.5 percent visited more often. The most popular discussions on the site were community gardening and the construction,process in Edina. E- commerce E- commerce on our sites totaled $35,025.74 in July. Top sellers were building permits, $16,189.77; Art Center class registration, $6.672; Aquatic Center season passes, $2,430; online payment of advertising sales, $1,919.50; tennis program registrations, $1,425.50; golf lesson registration, $1,300; and Art Center media class registration, $1,022. Webstreaming We have been streaming video on our website through Granicus for several years. The most requested videos on Granicus in July were the 4th of July parade, 13; early June episode of "Agenda: Edina" and late July episode of "Agenda: Edina," 4 each; and "Go Green Edina" lightbulb PSA, "Go Green Edina" rain barrel PSA, "Go Green Edina" shower PSA, "What's Up With the Weather ?" discussion, late April episode of :Agenda: Edina," late June episode of "Agenda: Edina" and July episode of "Beyond the Badge," 2 each. About 90 percent watched on a desktop, while 10 percent watched from some sort of mobile device. We have been streaming all programming on YouTube since January 2011. In July 2013, there were 5,863 views of an estimated 13,483 minutes on the City's YouTube "channel. The most requested videos on YouTube in July were the Edina Aquatic Center commercials, 769 views; 4th of July parade, 642; segment on the FlowRider from the early June 2012 episode of "Agenda: Edina," 515 views; 2012 4th of July parade, 365; early July episode of "Agenda: Edina," 215; Braemar Golf Course Fore! Loyalty Club commercial, 188; late July episode of "Agenda: Edina," 155; Edina Aquatic Center FlowRider commercial, 144; and late July "Agenda: Edina" segment on Morningside being the first City- recognized neighborhood association, 103. The majority of YouTube viewers — 66.6 percent — watched on a computer; 16.7 watched on a mobile phone and 14 percent watched on a tablet. Suggestions, Comments Please continue to review our new website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, contact me. If you have things that need to be fixed, please write to,helpdesk@EdinaMN.gov. Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director P 952- 833 -95201 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 JBennerotte(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov �� ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families �S` Doing Business Susan Howl From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 5:43 PM To: ED Everyone; Ann Swenson; James Hovland ahovland @krausehovland.com); Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: August Website Report Good afternoon! We use Google Analytics to monitor activity on our website. Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of August 2013: Total visits: 82,842 Number of unique visitors Average time of each visit Total page views: 234,146 56,404 2 minutes, 11 seconds Nearly 53 percent of visitors came just one time. About 47 percent visited more often. Besides the home page, the most visited page was the Edina Aquatic Center home page with 13,419 page views. Other top pages included the following (with number of page views): Centennial Lakes Park — 13,241 Braemar Golf Course — 12,153 Aquatic Center General Information — 9,613 Edinborough Park -6,853 Centennial Lakes Park Attractions — 5,934 Centennial Lakes Park Arts & Events — 5,221 Centennial Lakes Park Calendar -4,723 Edinborough Park General Information — 3,553 Braemar Golf Course Rates — 3,332 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the park facilities map. Other frequently downloaded files included the following: City Code Section 850 (Zoning Code) March 13, 2013 Crime Report Art Academy Drawing Lesson Plan Winter 2002 About Town Community Street Map Phase 1 Rezoning - Development Review Edina Bike Plan Shady Pines Addition Plat City Code Section 450 (Swimming Pools) The most popular blog category was the Parks & Recreation Department, followed by Police Chief Jeff Long's and City Manager Scott Neal's blogs. The most popular blog posts were "Don't You Cops Have Anything Better To Do ?" "I Am Not Taking Your Kid to Jail," "Lighthouse Night and Torchlight Concert at Centennial Lakes Park," "What is Important To You ?" and "Join the City's Adult Co -Rec Kickball League." The terms people uses to find our site were "Braemar golf," "city of edina," "edina aquatic center," "centennial lakes," "Braemar golf course," "edina pool," "edina water park," "edinborough park," "edina art center" and "edina mn." The most searched for words or phrases people used once people arrived at our site were "zoning map," "zoning," "mini golf," "hours,' "employment," "golf," "building permits," "jobs," "permits" and "wedding." Speak Up, Edina Activity on the "Speak Up, Edina" website reflected the following activity during the month of August 2013: Total visits: 364 Number of unique visitors: 301 Average time of each visit: 2 minutes, 5 seconds Total page views: 940 More than 69.5 percent of visitors came just one time. About 30.5 percent visited more often. The most popular discussion on the site was community gardening. E- commerce E- commerce on our sites totaled $59,498.81 in August. Top sellers were building permits, $35;576.90; Art Center class registrations, $13,551; Braemar Arena skating class registrations, $7,017; and dog licenses, $1,056. Webstreaming We have been streaming video on our website through Granicus for several years: The most requested videos on Granicus in August were the Aug. 5 City Council meeting (live), 579 views; Aug. 5 City Council meeting, 183; Aug. 20 City Council meeting, 104; July 16 City Council meeting, 31; Aug. 28 Planning Commission meeting, 24; July 10 Planning Commission meeting, 14; July 24 Planning Commission meeting, 12; Aug. 13 Park Board meeting, 10; July 18 Transportation Commission meeting, 9; and Aug. 14 Planning Commission meeting, 9.About 73 percent watched on a desktop, while 27 percent watched from some sort of mobile device. We have been streaming all programming on YouTube since January 2011. In August 2013, there were 4,644 views of an estimated 9,470 minutes on the City's YouTube channel. The most requested videos on YouTube in August were the Edina Aquatic Center commercials, 588 views; segment on the FlowRider from the early June 2012 episode of "Agenda: Edina," 351 views; August episode of "Enterprise Edina," 223; segment on VEAP relocation from the late August episode of "Agenda: Edina," 149 ; late August episode of "Agenda: Edina," 130; "Welcome to Edina" video, 122; August episode of "Beyond the Badge," 120; Quality of Life Survey presentation by City Manager Scott Neal, 105; early August episode of "Agenda: Edina," 101; and Edina Aquatic Center FlowRider commercial, 95. The majority of YouTube viewers — 68.1 percent — watched on a computer; 16.8 watched on a mobile phone and 12.6 percent watched on a tablet. Suggestions, Comments Please continue to review our website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, contact me. If you have things that need to be fixed, please write to helpdesk @EdinaMN.gov. Thanks! Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications S Technology Services Director 952- 833 -9520 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 JBennerotlelcDEdinaMN.00v I www.EdinaMN.gov '" ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL August 13, 2013 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. IL ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Steel, Jones, Gieseke, Jacobson; Deeds and Peterson. Member Cella arrived at 7:46 p.m. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Steel, Jones, Deeds, Gieseke, Jacobson, Dan Peterson. Motion carried.. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, approving the consent agenda as follows: - W.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of July 9, 2013 Ayes: Members Steel, Jones, Deeds, Gieseke, Jacobson, Peterson. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. Vl. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Strachauer Park Sidewalk, Parking and Storm Water Management Proposal Ms. Kattreh introduced the report on Strachauer Park related to sidewalks, parking, and storm water management. She noted that the neighbors previously expressed that the existing parking lot is not adequate. The plan is to eventually add a sidewalk on the west end as well. She noted it would be paid for by the Pedestrian and Cycling Safety Fund. The improvements could be done on a two -year plan during 2014 and 2015, or they could be completed fully in 2014. Ms. Kattreh explained, in response to questions by the Park Board, that the parking spaces would be on- street,parking. She also stated staff is workingon a bike rack plan for all parks, so that will eventually be added. Member Jones asked whether the sidewalk will also function as a bike path and Ms. Kattreh clarified it will just be a standard sized sidewalk. Chair Steel expressed safety concerns of allowing parking on both sides of the street. Member Jones supported a plan to replace any trees that have to be removed during construction so that the look and function of the park are improved. Ms. Kattreh concurred and encouraged that to be part of the motion to approve. 1 The Board discussed improved accessibility via a path to the park and what impact it would have on the flooding required for the hockey rink. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Peterson, to approve the proposal and recommend that it be completed in 2014 as one project. Ms. Kattreh clarified the stormwater management will be a low -lying wetland area with plantings. Member Jones made an amendment to the motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, that the plan includes replacement trees. Question called on Motion with Amendment. Ayes: Steel, Jones, Deeds, Gieseke, Jacobson, Peterson. Motion carried. VI.B. Park Board Work Plan Update Ms. Kattreh noted that the work plan is on track; the needs assessment was kicked off earlier this year, with an anticipated completion date of 2014. She noted the enterprise cost recovery goals have not been started, but the board could begin on that later in 2013 or in 2014. The Garden Park baseball field renovations are underway and should be completed in August. The Lake Edina pathway is complete; the Countryside Park master plan was approved by the board earlier in 2013 and is now under construction with an anticipated completion date of October 2013. Member Peterson asked that a minimum requirement be set for enterprise cost recovery and if that is missed for two or three years, an evaluation should occur. He also stated the Yorktown Community Garden project is a huge success and suggested putting in another garden at the same spot next year. Chair Steel expressed the importance of determining the role of the enterprise facilities first, specifically with regard to whether the goal is to make money and if that is a different goal from a facility like the Edina Senior Center. She suggested staff not complete the entire strategic plan in this area, but rather make headway on the role those facilities play in the Parks Department as a whole. Member Deeds asked how the Sports Dome will affect the work plan for next year. Ms. Kattreh explained that would be on the plan for 2014, pending City Council approval. There is a work session set up and that will give a sense of the direction to be taken. Ms. Jones asked about the cooperative agreement with the school district. Ms. Kattreh stated that is something that will be touched on with the school district in the next few months. A joint meeting is scheduled between the School Board and City Council, and that may be delayed. At the meeting shared use of city facilities and school district facilities will be discussed. Ms. Jones stated she does like the green initiatives listed on the work plan. Member Deeds suggested a mountain bike path be considered in future years as there seems to be some level of support and demand for it. Member Jones expressed support for more community gardens and also suggested the addition of coordinating a central place for those interested in volunteering for the city and particularly the parks. She is aware that every year the high school has several students looking for projects. Chair Steel suggested the Park Board should create subcommittees to look into the mountain bike paths; the central volunteer location; and the green energy initiatives rather than relying solely on staff. Member Jones expressed interest in working on both green energy initiatives and volunteer project. Member Deeds stated he will look into the mountain bike path idea. Ms. Kattreh stated another idea is to study the Senior Center operations. Chair Steel stated all of the facilities need to have some study to think about the big picture; but she would like to first complete the steps of the strategic planning process to guide the facilities. Member Jones asked about the recreation program plan. Chair Steel explained it is part of her Humphrey project. She has been working on facilitating staff to discuss mission, purpose, and strategic issues; currently she is working on coming up with surveys to collect data on past participants. It is a good pilot program for strategic planning in the department. The deadline is October 2013 and she will bring the data forward to the Park Board. Member Jones asked about the timeline for the work plan. Ms. Kattreh responded she will put together a recommended plan and bring it to the Board at their next meeting for comments and review. The work plan has to be finalized by the end of September. Member Jones stated the donations and naming policies have never been publicly presented-at a City Council meeting. Ms. Kattreh stated she would like those items wrapped up by the end of the year. She noted she does intend to involve the working group again, if those members are willing. She would like to incorporate the comments from the City Council at the joint meeting and have another go -round for it for Park Board and City Council approval before the end of the year. VI.C. Centennial Lakes Promenade Final Phase Ms. Kattreh noted the consultants will be presenting the Centennial Lakes Promenade final phase at the September Park Board meeting. She encouraged the Park Board members to visit the Promenade prior to the next meeting. Member Deeds asked about the funding of this project. Ms. Kattreh stated a detailed breakdown of costs and funding sources will be given at the next Park Board meeting. VI.D. 2013 Quality of Life Survey Results Ms. Kattreh apologized that the consultant, Decision Resources, was unable to attend tonight's Park Board meeting, but they will do a presentation at the September Park Board meeting. She noted that there are a set number of questions every year, along with some questions that change each year. Member Jones asked for a copy of the survey from three years ago and five years ago. Ms. Kattreh agreed to provide it at the next meeting. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VILA. Council Updates None. VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None. 3 Ur. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh made the following comments: the Community Garden parking lot will be completed this week; the Garden Park baseball field renovation will be completed at the end of August; the Sports Dome presentation will be made at the August 20 City Council work session; the Edina Aquatic Center will be closing for the season on August 25; and the camps and summer playground programs will be wrapping up this week. Member Peterson asked about the Fred Richards Golf Course. Ms. Kattreh stated the golf course has been discussed a bit at both the staff and City Council level. Currently, staff. is working on a study of golf operations and plans to make a recommendation on golf operations and the future of Fred Richards Golf Course later this year. A consultant was hired to study the financial aspects, specifically over the past five to ten years, and to make recommendations on operational aspects. In response to a question by Member Jones, Ms. Kattreh.clarified that she will be making a recommendation to the City Council for the north /south version of the Sports Dome with the wider dome, as well as leaving the space available for an outdoor refrigerated rink. x ADJOURNMENT Member Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to adjourn the meeting at 7:51 p.m. Ayes: Members Steel, Jones, Deeds, Gieseke, Jacobson, Peterson, Cella. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:51 p.m. ; 4 MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, August 13, 2013 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Moore and Members Mellom, Christiaansen, O'Brien, Weber, Sussman, McDermott, Holtan, Johnson and Birdman. Absent was Member Good. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member O'Brien moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Mellom seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES July 9, 2013 Member Mellom moved to approve the minutes from the July 9, 2013 meeting. Member Weber seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. H -13 -4 4401 Country Club Road — Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for an Addition to a Garage Facing Country Club. Road Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the south side of the 4400 block of Country Club Road. The home, constructed in 1939.is a.Colonial Revival /Neocolonial style with a small attached 2 -car garage and living space above accessed- by a driveway from Country -Club: Road on the east side of the property. The proposed plans involve expanding the 2 car attached garage from 16'6" in width to 22', thus adding 110 square feet which will increase the total area from- 330 to 440 square feet in area. The increased space will provide room to maneuver around parked cars, as well as allow for some additional storage space. The minimum .size;;of .. a typical 2 -car garage is 400 square feet in area - the existing garage at 330 square feet would be considered sub - standard. The plans also include a master bath renovation over the garage. A small gable window is shown to be replaced with two double hung windows set into a shed dormer. Shutters are proposed on either side of the windows, replicating those Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes August 13, 2013 found on the second story windows above the front entry. A narrative provided by the applicant points out that the existing window on the east wall of the garage will be re- installed on the east wall of the expanded garage space. They add that the intent of the proposed design is to enhance the functionality of the home while respecting the existing original design. Preservation Consultant Vogel reviewed the proposal and provided his evaluation in a memorandum providing the following information: Built in 1939, the subject property contributes to the historic significance and integrity of the Country Club District but it is not considered. individually eligible for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark. Although it was identified as a "colonial" in the original 1980 Country Club National Register nomination, most architectural historians today would.probably classify it as an example of the Neocolonial style —it could also be categorized as Minimal Traditional or Contractor Modern, which are Midcentury Modern house forms. It -reflects the architectural design standards imposed by Thorpe Bros. on new homes built in the district before 1944; more importantly, this house shows the influence of the guidelines for suburban housing issued by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) during the late 1930s. This type of house is not uncommon in Edina's postwar subdivisions and often occurs as in fill housing in the older developed neighborhoods. In my professional opinion, the proposed work is' consistent with the. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. No significant architectural features or details. will be destroyed,and the designer has done a good job making the additions architecturally compatible in size, scale and texture with the rest of the house. As built, approximately one -third of the houses in the district were constructed with attached garages and front - loading attached.garages are regarded as a historic character - defining feature of Neocolonial style houses. With respect to .the proposed addition of a shed -tyke roof dormer on the principal elevation, these structures are occasionally seen on Period Revival houses in the district; they are somewhat more common on bungalow cottages built in the late 1920s" but would be considered appropriate for Neocolonial houses constructed in the late 1930s. I recommend approval of the COA with the usual conditions. Ms. Repya concluded that she agreed with Mr. Vogel's evaluation and also recommended approval. of the COA request subject to the plans presented. She added that findings supporting the approval recommendation include: • No significant historic architectural features or fabric of the home will be destroyed. • The proposed alterations are compatible with the historic character of the house. • The plans provided clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. • The existing garage measuring 330 square feet in area is considered sub - standard for a 2 -stall garage, thus the plan to increase the size by 110 square feet is reasonable and advantageous for the property. • The information provided supporting the subject COA meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes August 13, 2013 Board members asked for clarification of the design elements from the property owner, Susan Bennett. Member Weber complimented the plan noting:the proposal fits in well with the original home. Member Mellom agreed, pointing out that she liked how the changes address the needed functionality of the home while being true to its architectural style. Following a brief discussion Member O'Brien moved approval of the subject COA subject to the plans presented. Member Mello.m seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Properties Ms. Repya reported that over the past year; former Member Davis had researched information available regarding sustainable building practices that could be applied to historic buildings. Mr. Davis had compiled brochures and information booklets that addressed best building practices relative to building disassembly and material salvage with the intent of creating an HPB brochure that could be shared with contractors working on historic properties in Edina. Since Mr. Davis' departure from the board earlier this year, the National Park Service has issued the Illustrated Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings to enhance overall understanding and interpretation of basic- preservation principals. The guidelines offer specific guidance on how to make historic buildings more sustainable in a manner that will preserve their historic character and that will meet The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Preservation Consultant Vogel provided a memorandum.to the board where he observed'that the city's preservation code and comprehensive plan already reference the, Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (most recently revised in 1992 and codified in 1995). For design review and compliance purposes, he recommended the HPB adopt the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for the Treatment of Cultural Landscapes, published by the Park Service's Historic Landscape Initiative in 1996. Ms. Repya pointed out that although the subject illustrated guidelines have been designed as part of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic 'Properties which the H PB uses as a guide for design review decision; because creating guidelines for sustainability is one of the initiatives in the HPB's 2013 work plan, she recommended adoption of Resolution HPB -013, adding the newly published Illustrated Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings to The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Property referenced in Section 850.20, Subd. C. of the city code. In doing so, the completion of the work plan initiative would be officially recognized. Ms. Repya further recommended that that the Illustrated 3 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes August 13, 2013 Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings is made available to the public on the HPB's page on the city's website. A brief discussion ensued in which the board commented that the illustrated guidelines will be a nice reference to post on the HPB web site page. Member Mellom then moved to adopt Resolution HPB -013 adding the Illustrated Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings to the references used by the, HPB for design review; and to guide the public with best practices for using sustainable practices when rehabilitating historic properties. Member Birdman seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. City Council & HPB Work Session - September 17"' Planner Repya reminded the board that-the HPB's joint work session with the City Council will take place on Tuesday, September 17`" at 5:30 p.m. The annual work session provides an opportunity to review the 2013 work plan — providing the Council with an update of the previous year's activities'and also ensuring that the board's, priorities are consistent with the Council's. Ms. Repya pointed out that planning for the work session will take place at the September HPB meeting. Board members agreed that they lookedforward to meeting with the City.Council. D. West Minneapolis Heights. Tour - Reflections Chair Moore commented that the HPB's annual tour which:took place on July Th in the West Minneapolis Heights section of the Presidents neighborhood (northwest Edina) was, as usual, a highlight of the summer for the HPB. Board members'agreed pointing out that they were impressed with the diversity of development in the area.. They also observed avast potpourri of architectural styles in a relatively small area. Looking at ways to enhance future tours of the. city, the following suggestions were made: • Provide notice to the community to participate via "City Extra ". • Invite the Mayor /City Council to join in. • Invite people who live in the tour area to participate. • Consider partnering with the Edina Historical Society. Chair Moore concluded that those were excellent suggestions which should be considered when planning the tour for summer 2014. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS - None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes August 13, 2013 Chair Moore had the following information to share with the board: • The Historical Society is selling Edina t -shirts in recognition of the .City's Quasquicentennial. The cost is $15 and they are available at the Edina History Museum. • The Historical Society is sponsoring an Edina House tour on Sunday, September 15a'. Three historic houses to include the Baird House, a. Morningside Bungalow and a Country Club District home (which is owned by HPB Member Mellom) will be included in the tour led by docents. Tickets are available at City Hall for $15 until the day of the event When tickets will then be $20. Mr. Moore encouraged the board members to partake in the tour. • September 28" is the date of the Southdale Center's Grand Re- Opening. Mr. Moore did not have details on the time /events planned, however promised to provide more information at the next HPB meeting. X. STAFF COMMENTS. .- 4300 France Avenue — Ms. Repya explained that an owner of 4300 France Avenue inquired about the potential for her home to be designated an Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL). The home, built -in 1905 is purported to be the-first home built on FrancerAvenue - a historic photo is on page 85 of the Edina, Chapters in the City's History book. Ms. Repya explained that she shared information on the designation process and the benefits of a landmark designation. The next steps will include a meeting with the homeowners, staff and Preservation Consultant Vogel to glean what information is available on the property, and further discuss the process. If the homeowners decide that they would like to pursue a landmark designation, Mr. Vogel would then undertake composing a nomination study which would. be shared with the State Historic Preservation Office who must have 45 days to comment on a proposed designated property. The potential designation (which is considered an, overlay zoning adding the EH designation to the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit designation), must, be reviewed by the Planning Commission who provide their opinion °to,the City Countil Who makes, the ultimate decision relative to the landmark designation. Board Members were pleased that a homeowner approached the .City regarding the potential for adding the landmark designation to their property, and agreed that they looked forward to staying advised on the progress of this potential designation. Student Members — Ms. Repya advised the Board that for the 2013 -2014 school year current student member Nathan Johnson will return to serve with the HPB. Member Sarah Good will 5 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes August 13, 2013 move on to the Park Board. Taking Sarah's place will be Andrew Brandt. Andrew's first meeting will be September 10`h State Preservation Conference — September 12 & 13 — Lanesboro, MN — Ms. Repya reminded the board that the deadline to register for the upcoming State Preservation Conference, September 12 and 13 in Lanesboro, MN is Thursday, August 15th. She pointed out that there are Certified Local Government (CLG) scholarship funds available to defray the costs incurred, however they are available on a first -come first -served basis, thus the application process needs to be completed by this Friday. Members Weber and Holtan indicated that they would be interested in attending. Ms. Repya asked them to register for the conference with the Minnesota Historical Society and arrange for their lodging in Lanesboro; and turn their receipts into her in order to complete the scholarship application process. XI. NEXT MEETING DATE September 10, 2013 XII. ADJOURNMENT 8:15 p.m. Member O'Brien moved for adjournment at 8:15 p.m. Member Holtan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 28, 2013 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Scherer, Schroeder, Carpenter, Potts, Kilberg, Platteter, Carr, Forrest, Grablel, Staunton III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Potts moved approval of the meeting agenda. Commissioner Carpenter seconded - _- the motion: All voted aye; motion carried: - IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Carpenter moved approval of August 14, 2013 Planning Commission meeting minutes. - Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. Vl. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Preliminary Plat with Variances. Great Neighborhood Homes. 6609 Blackfoot Pass, Edina, MN Planner Teague reported that the applicant has requested, a continuance of this item to the September 11, 2013 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Scherer moved to continue the public hearing for Great Neighborhood Homes to Wednesday, September 11, 2013. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing continued to September 11, 2013. Page 1 of 14 B. Variance. Jim Kellison / Kello Services. 5221 -5275 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission a 5 foot side yard setback variance from the required 10 foot drive -aisle side yard setback for truck maneuvering in the south west corner of the site located at 5221 -5275 Edina Industrial Boulevard for Jim Ellison /Cello Services, LLC. The applicant is requesting a 5 -foot setback variance to widen a drive aisle next to the existing building in the south west corner of the site located at 5221 -75 Edina Industrial Boulevard. Currently semi - trailer trucks drive beyond the pavement and onto the grass in order to maneuver around the building. The added pavement and retaining wall proposed will allow the trucks to turn without over - spilling onto the lawn area. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variance based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a) The practical difficult is caused by the existing location of the building and narrow drive aisle. b) The encroachment into the setback is a relatively minor and in a very small area of the site. C) The request is reasonable given the location of the existing building and narrow drive way, (too narrow for truck movements). Approval of the variance is also subject to the following condition: 1. The drive aisle improvement must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped August 13, 2013. 2. The applicant will need to acquire permission to encroach in the easement area from Xcel Energy as requested by the City Engineer and as indicated in the City Engineer's memo dated August 21, 2013. Appearing for the Applicant Jim Kellison Page 2 of 14 Discussion Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague what the zoning classification is on the properties to the west. Teague responded that the zoning classification for the adjacent properties to the west is PID, Planned Industrial District, with the City of Bloomington also to the west. Commissioner Carr asked the applicant if the variance was approved does he plan on re- landscaping the site. Mr. Kellison responded in the affirmative, adding a retailing wall, new sod and plantings will be added. Public Hearing Chair Staunton asked if anyone would like to speak to the item; being none, Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye ;'public hearing closed. Motion Commissioner Grabiel -moved variance approval based on -staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. C. Site Plan with Variances. Paul Reinke /Oak Development. 6545 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Silver Oak Development on behalf of the IRET Properties is proposing to build a four story 60,000 square foot medical office expansion, and new parking ramp expansion to the existing 273,000 square foot Southdale Medical Office building located at 6525 -45 France Avenue. The new addition would be located on the south side of the existing building and west of the existing parking ramp. Teague stated to accommodate the proposed addition, the following is requested; Site Plan Review., Parking Ramp Setback Variance from 40 and 34.5 feet to 34.5, 28 and 20 feet for the new parking deck to match the existing parking ramp setback. Differing setbacks are required for the ramp structure because the ramp itself is 34.5 feet tall; and the structure around the stairs is 40 feet tall and a parking stall Variance from 1,715 spaces to 1,577 spaces. A proof of parking plan for an additional deck could expand parking to 1,749 spaces has been provided. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for the Southdale Medical building expansion based on the following findings: Page 3 of 14 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the parking space and ramp variances. 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and'the parking on the site would contain adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses: 3. The variances are reasonable. As mentioned, the setbacks for the parking ramp expansion, match the existing setbacks. The parking study concludes that the proposed addition and existing uses on the site would be supported by the existing parking facilities: Traditionally, the City of Edina has not required parking stalls, when they are not needed. Additional parking could be provided by adding levels to the existing parking ramps if needed. 4. The parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. Approval of the Site Plan is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped July 26, 2013. • Grading plan date stamped July 26; 2013. • Landscaping plan date stamped July 26, 2013. • Lighting plan date stamped July 26, 2013. • Building elevations date stamped•July 26, 2013. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting.; 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to. staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City. may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated August 22, 2013. r 6. Should delays and queuing become an issue at the France Avenue /65 Street intersection in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 7. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. Page 4 of 14 8. The applicant must enter into a proof of parking agreement with the City to ensure the necessary parking space will be provided if needed. Should parking become a significant problem, staff will require the proof of parking stalls constructed by adding the addition to the parking ramp. Appearing for the Applicant Paul Reinke Discussion Commissioner Carpenter asked Planner Teague who determines the "share" a business pays for street improvements. Chuck Rickart addressed the question and explained that the cost a business pays for street improvements is determined by a sliding scale process taking into account the size of the expansion including the change in traffic patterns, increase in trip generations, etc. Rickart pointed out in this area; especially on this corner (West 65th Street) there are a number of players that would be responsible for the improvements, pointing out each "corner" is and or will be undergoing expansion. With regard to the Proof of Parking (POP) agreement recommended in the staff report Commissioner Carpenter asked what triggers it. Planner Teague explained that Edina Ordinance indicates that the City Manager is the "body" that determines if the POP should be implemented. Commissioner Grabiel asked Teague if he recalls the City Manager initiating a POP. Teague responded to date he's not aware of any POP agreement(s) that have been implemented at the request of the City Manager. Most businesses police themselves. Commissioner Forrest indicated she is hesitant to support the loading dock in the new location. Continuing, Forrest also questioned how the traffic analysis calculated vehicle trips. Mr. Rickart responded that the parking analysis viewed this site as a medical use site. Forrest pointed out the site is also planned for retail. Rickart responded a small retail component was also included in the calculations (Regional Medical with Retail Component), adding the majority of medical uses including hospitals operate some form of onsite retail. Commissioner Potts asked Planner Teague who reviews the internal traffic circulation on the plans. Teague responded that the City Engineer reviews all internal vehicle movements. Commissioner Schroeder asked Mr. Rickart if he believes the ingress /egress is necessary at 48- feet, adding it's rather wide. Schroeder commented that in his opinion safety in pedestrian navigation is important and would be compromised with 48 -feet of lane(s) to navigate. Commissioner Carr referred to the landscaping plan and suggested that the applicant take another look at it and plant trees taller than indicated. Planner Teague commented that the Page 5 of 14 proposed landscaping plan exceeds ordinance; however, the Commission can request extra, taller plantings because of the need for a variance. Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if he knows what the zoning is on the opposite side of the street (Drew). Planner Teague responded the zoning on the east side of Drew is also Regional Medical (RMD). Applicant Presentation Paul Reinke addressed the Commission and introduced the development team, Gail Greion, property manager and James O'Shea, architect. Mr. Reinke said they were very excited about the proposed expansion. Mr. O'Shea addressed the comments on the. loading dock and explained the existing facility doesn't have a "true" loading dock area and the goal of this design is to have one consolidated loading dock for the entire site. O'Shea said the new design can incorporate two semi - trailer loading berths and 1 small loading berth for the smaller delivery vehicles.. Continuing, O'Shea further explained with regard to the proposed drive aisle.width that it was felt that the larger width would provide a wider turning.radius for the larger vehicles. Concluding, O'Shea reported that the new office building is proposed at 60,000 square feet; including a new parking garage /ramp withr 1,180 parking spaces, adding these spaces will accommodate existing and future parking.levels. O'Shea-,said that at this time their'thought is. that the parking will be built first. With regard'to West 66th Street it will be enhanced with landscaping including an enhancement.of Drew Avenue. Discussion Commissioner Carr commented that she has a concern with the location of the loading dock and questioned if it could be placed in another location; possibly to the rear.. Mr. O'Shea responded that they considered different locations for the garage; however, found no-viable alternatives. He explained working with large semi - trailers poses a challenge. Carr also stated she wants the pedestrian walkways to be clearly delineated to-ensure that both the pedestrians and vehicles are aware of these walkways. Commissioner Platteter stated that he agrees with Commissioner Schroeder's observation that the widths of the drive aisles entering and exiting the site are large. Platteter asked if vegetation would be planted to screen the new loading dock. Mr. O'Shea responded in the affirmative, adding their intent into plant Spruce trees. O'Shea also noted there is a retaining wall /berm in this area along 66th Street that would also help screen the loading dock. Platteter asked the height of the new trees. O'Shea responded their intent is to plant 6 -foot trees. Page 6of14 Commissioner Forrest told the applicant she wants them to make every effort to completely screen the loading dock. She also expressed concern about truck maneuvering (backing up) and pedestrian safety in this area. Continuing, Forrest noted there is a discrepancy in parking numbers depicted on the 2007 submittal vs. this submittal, adding she wants assurances the parking is adequate. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing; being none Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public.hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Further Discussion and Motion Commissioner Carr stated she has reservations about the location of the new loading dock. Continuing, she reiterated she wants all walkways clearly delineated and would like more attention paid to landscaping along Drew Avenue and West 66th Street. Carr indicated as submitted she couldn't support the request. Commissioner Forrest reiterated her concern is about the differences in the parking calculations on the 2007 plan vs. the calculations submitted for this project. Forrest - - acknowledged the POP agreement; adding she doesn't want to see the site over parked but wants to ensure it is adequately parked. Forrest also noted she can't support the proposal as submitted; the loading dock needs further attention along with the ingress /egress. Chair Staunton pointed out that the applicant has presented a POP agreement indicating if more parking spaces are needed parking spaces would be increased per agreement. Commissioner Scherer asked to note for the record the overall plan provides 1,577 parking spaces and if the POP agreement is initiated there will be a total of 1,752 parking spaces. Commissioner Schroeder stated he doesn't like the way this project interfaces with West 66th Street. Schroeder reiterated that the ingress /egress is too wide, too much pavement for pedestrians to navigate and the minimal space for semi - trucks backing in and out makes him uncomfortable Continuing, Schroeder said he has no issue with the building, his issue is with site access and loading dock area. Continuing, Schroeder commented in order to get a "better product" the Commission could entertain the idea of approving setback variances to achieve a better.development. Schroeder acknowledged a setback variance is needed for the ramp but with flexibility more may be able to be done with relief to the building setback. Chair Staunton agreed with Schroeder's comment and asked Mr. Reinke if they ever considered expanding to the west. Mr. Reinke said expanding toward France Avenue wasn't considered because of the internal orientation of the building and setback. Continuing, Staunton asked if there was another place for the loading dock. Mr. Reinke responded as previously mentioned this is the best location for the loading dock because it reduces internal congestion and it consolidates the loading, delivery and trash removal. Reinke also noted this configuration also provides management with the opportunity to better manage all vehicle and pedestrian circulation. Reinke said that all deliveries from the semi - trucks would be coordinated so no Page 7 of 14 large vehicle deliveries would occur during peak hours. Large deliveries would take place in the early am or late pm managed by building management. Gayle Greion told the Commission that this project if approved would allow the site to accommodate deliveries from large vehicles; presently the site cannot accommodate large deliveries which are a detriment to the tenants. Greion said they are very happy to have a more formal delivery area that can accommodate large vehicles and lessen the harshness of Minnesota winter weather. Commissioner Platteter asked Ms. Greion to reiterate office management can regulate times when semi - trucks can deliver. Ms. Greion responded that delivery times can be scheduled through management and won't disrupt regular business hours. Commissioner Carr said another "concern she has is with the proximity of the loading dock to other vehicles and pedestrian traffic. The discussion continued on the loading dock, traffic circulation, width of the drive aisles, landscaping, etc. with some Commissioners expressing the opinion that they couldn't support the-proposal as-submitted: - Planner Teague reminded the Commission this project is for site plan approval adding'what's requested is permitted. Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if the. City Engineer'has reviewed the project. Teague responded in the affirmative. . Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Site Plan approval with Variance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including the additional conditions: increase landscaping along.DrewAvenue plant;taller trees (12 -foot) on West 66th Street to better screen the loading dock area;.clearly delineate all pedestrian walkways and a reduce the width of the ingress /egress. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. Commissioner Carr asked Planner Teague if this motion should be done in two parts. Teague responded that the actions are tied so one motion is sufficient. Ayes; Platteter, Potts, Grabiel, Staunton. Nays; Scherer, Schroeder, Carpenter, Carr, Forrest. Motion failed 4 -5 VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review — 6725 York Avenue, the Wicks site Page 8 of 14 Commissioner Potts recused himself from the discussion. Planner Comments Planner Teague told the Commission staff received a Sketch Plan Review for 6725 York Avenue (the former Wick's). Teague explained the applicant is in negotiation with the owners of Wick's and the five (5) residential homes fronting Xerxes Avenue. Teague stated the subject site is currently zoned PCD -3. Continuing, Teague said the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing commercial and the five single family homes and build a six -story, 273 unit upscale apartment building with 22,289 square feet of retail space on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail component on York with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Teague reported to accommodate the request four (4) amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required as follows: • Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 66 feet • Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 82 - - • Floor Area Ratio -from 1.0-to 3.1 • Re- guiding the land use for the six single - family homes from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. Teague concluded the applicant is considering a rezoning of the properties to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Chmielewski, Lennar Multifamily Investors, LLC Applicant Presentation Mr. Chmielewski gave a brief history on Lennar and explained that originally they only considered the Wick's site; however felt only utilizing that site pushed the envelope so they decided to approach residential property owners on Xerxes to obtain those houses and add them to the site. Continuing, Chmielewski said they propose to build a high -end luxury multifamily rental community with complimentary.retail. Chmielewski introduced Aaron Russet to further speak to the proposal. Mr. Russet told the Commission they are very happy to be in Edina. Russet referred to the density and explained that the calculations presented in the redevelopment materials did not include the five single family homes they are hoping to acquire. Continuing, Russet explained they are proposing to build a 273 -unit upscale multifamily complex that is six (6) stories with retail below. Russet said the attraction to this site is the walkability factor, adding from this Page 9of14 location the residents of the building have access to all venues, shopping, City Park, library, Government Center, etc. Russet further explained that their intent is to create an urban mixed -use, pedestrian friendly sustainable community. As previously mentioned by Mr. Chmielewski the area offers abundance to.amenities and this creates an environment without dependence on daily automobile. trips. Continuing, Russet said they are committed to sustainable design principles reflected in the City's Comprehensive Plan. He added their intent will feature green elements including green construction, practices, material specification, thermal high- efficiency windows and numerous planted green spaces both on the site as well as on the roof. Russet said they are also.working with the White Group on sustainability. With graphics Mr. Russet concluded highlighting the following aspects of the project: • Open terraces on both ends of the project (pocket parks) • Walking paths'of high quality pavement • Decorative lighting . • Front doors 6'- All- parking is proposed to be contained within • Building is designed open.to the south • Exterior building materials include transparent glass storefront, masonry and "Edina" limestone,* street level. Above includes composition of masonry, architectural metal and large amounts of glass ' • Unit breakdown 7% studio. 40% one bedroom, 11% one bedroom plus den and 32% two bedrooms. Chair Staunton thanked the development team for their presentation and explained the Sketch Plan Review process is informal and nonbinding. Commissioner Grabiel stated he was encouraged that someone was considering purchasing the site and redeveloping the property. Grabiel acknowledged he was somewhat concerned when he first reviewed the materials; however, if the five residential homes are acquired that's a different story. Grabiel asked if three bedrooms or two bedrooms plus den were ever considered. Mr. Russet responded that this development -would be a "rent by choice" and they have found that many people that rent by choice are either downsizing or desire smaller living space. Russet explained that at this time they are waiting for an update of the market'study; however, it appears the market may be for smaller spaces. Continuing, Grabiel acknowledged this is an area of heightened activity, questioning if the market is sound for this type of project in such a dense area. Russet responded that population metrics indicated a drop in `home ownership and for every percent home ownership drops a million families need a home. Walkability is also a very important factor in home choice and this area is highly walkable. Page 10 of 14 Commissioner Carpenter asked if the owners of the homes have been contacted. Mr. Ch mielewski said that process is continuing through a real estate broker adding two of the homes are in foreclosure and it takes a little more time when working with banks. Commissioner Carr stated she really loves the look of the building but does have a concern with the proposed density; which is clearly on the high side. Carr said she agreed with the comments from Grabiel especially on unit size,. adding the two'bedroom with den in her opinion would be an attractive choice. Carr said in her opinion the project is intriguing and if special care is taken in buffering the residential properties in Richfield this may be a good project. Concluding Carr noted that with regard to the retail space depicted on the plans the applicant should be aware for future retail tenants that the abutting property is a large grocery store. . , . Mr. Chmielewski said with regard to unit numbers, spacing and size it's important to find the right density to ensure that the project will be successful. Chmielewski said the property owners reside in New York City and their price for the subject property reflects the New York City market. Chmielewski said the development team would take under advisement all comments from.the Commission and would make every effort to buffer Xerxes Avenue. He added at-this -time their intent through design -is to make the units feel and look like townhomes /brownstones vs. the traditional apartment building look. Commissioner Schroeder said he finds the project and site plan interesting, adding he likes the connectivity and other elements of the project; however has a few concerns about the Xerxes Avenue side. Schroeder said the Xerxes Avenue component of the project is the most difficult to address. He pointed out as presented the proposed facade facing Xerxes Avenue is imposing. He suggested that they reconsider the large facade and relocate a portion of the building by placing it on top of the building nearest France Avenue. This change; in his opinion, would better suit the site, adding height in this area is generally found along York Avenue; not Xerxes (Westin, new Southdale apartments etc.). Continuing Schroeder pointed out when considering the projects impact on Xerxes Avenue, vehicle traffic, especially truck traffic, needs to be further reviewed. Schroeder stated if left as is all truck traffic would only occur on Xerxes Avenue. Concluding Schroeder asked the applicants to consider "marrying" the subject sites loading dock area with the Cub Foods loading dock. This action would reduce and mitigate all delivery traffic. Commissioner Scherer complemented the look of the building but shared concerns over the amount of concrete on the site and its impact on Richfield. Commissioner Platteter stated that overall he's not opposed to the density of the project or building height; however, has a concern with the ramp accessing the underground parking. Platteter suggested that this access point be relocated more to the middle to avoid confusion. With regard to connectivity Platteter said he likes the incorporation this project includes to enhance pedestrian spaces. Concluding, Platteter said he also supports the requirement for affordable housing. Page 11 of 14 Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if he knows the zoning classification the City of Richfield has on their side of Xerxes (east). Teague responded he's not sure of;that zoning. He added he knows that Richfield either has or is,going through a rezoning process for this area to .allow; for more density. Grabiel said during the review process. the City needs to keep in mind what's best for Edina while being. respectful to the City of Richfield. The development team acknowledged that much of their focus is in "the devils in the details,% adding they really appreciate the comments from the Commission. Mr. Russet acknowledged - this site is.a challenge; however believes''it's worth it. Commissioner Forrest said that while the.project has good points she is concerned with how portions of the project violate the Comprehensive plan. Forrest added as previously mentioned the homes across..the street from this project will be impacted. She concluded she likes the look but has concerns.' The discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that th'e project has merit; however, wants the development'tean�to take a further look at reducing the buildings impact on Xerxes Avenue,- increase- greenspace where - possible; consider the City Corn prehensivePlan A uring the design process, reconsider the fagade of;the building as it relates to Xerxes Avenue, carefully consider the retail tenant mix, better design the building's access point and continue to work on the loading dock area and the:underground parking.access, etc. Also it is very important to work with the residents of Richfield to reduce-and or minimize the buildings impact on them. Chair Staunton thanked the ;appli6ant forsharing their sketch plan with them. Staunton stated he hopes their venture is successful adding.that so far no one has found something that could work for this site. Staunton reiterated his thanks and stressed to the applicant the importance of communicating with the City of Richfield. The applicants ensured Chair Staunton they would engage the City of Richfield and Xerxes Avenue residents. B. 2014 Work Plan Chair Staunton told the Commission every fall the Planning Commission Work Plan is discussed and prioritized. Staunton said that at this time he would like Commissioners to start thinking about the 2014 Work Plan. Staunton said any topic suggestions should be forwarded to Teague or him prior to the Commission meeting. Staunton concluded that his goal for finalizing the Work Plan is for some time in September or October. Commissioner Scherer noted it may be a good idea to discuss the Work Plan prior to a Commission meeting. Commissioners agreed. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Page 12 of 14 Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Staunton reported at a future PlanningCommission Meeting Roger Knutton, City Attorney would be invited to speak with us on variances since the court ruling on variances and the ordinance changes. Staunton said.he was looking at September 11th or the 25th as alarget date for Mr. Knutson. Staunton said'he would also like to schedule a visit from Cindy Larson, Residential Redevelopment Coordinator and have her share with the Commission what she's found in the field. Commissioner Forrest.asked Planner Teague the date and time the City Council will discuss. Pentagon Park. Planner Teague responded that the Council will discuss Pentagon Park prior to their regular at 6:00 PM. Commissioners are invited to attend. Commissioner Carpenter announced he would be stepping down as a member of the Planning Commission. Carpenter stated he enjoyed his time on the Planning Commission, adding it provided him with a wonderful opportunity to give back to the community. Chair Staunton thanked Commissioner Carpenter for his years of service to the Commission and the entire community of Edina. Commissioners echoed those comments, adding Carpenter would be missed. Chair Stanton reported that the City Council has appointed Mike Fischer to fill in Commissioner Carpenter's remaining 2013 term. Commissioner Platteter commented that he along with Commissioner Carr are members of the Living Streets work group and will be attending.a meeting on Living Streets on September 4cn Commissioner Carr reported that the City Council recently adopted a Living Streets concept policy. X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported that the City Council denied the request by Mr. and Mr. Shanight to subdivide their property at 5416 Tracy Avenue. Teague reminded the Commission they approved the Shanight's request for subdivision last month. Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if the City Council supported the request to construct an assisted living facility at 6500 France. Teague said Council granted preliminary Page 13 of 14 approval and the applicant will submit their final plans for approval for both the Commission and Council review. XI. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Carr moved meeting adjournment at 10:00 PM. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Jackie g0oot a taMet Respectfully submitted Page 14 of 14 <r ,4 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 18, 2013 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to approve the meeting agenda. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2013 — Approved as corrected. Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Whited to approve the revised minutes of June 20, 2013. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT— None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS) Update Transportation planner Mark Nolan presented the following short, medium and long term plans for the PACS fund: Short Term • Prepare strategy for utilization of PACS fund • Finalize Sidewalk Priority Plan criteria • 2013 Sidewalk /Non- Motorized Transportation Facilities (NMTF) projects ■ School Road Sidewalk • Vernon Avenue Bike Lanes • Ped- activated pedestal- mounted flashers (Rosland Park, Edina High and Valley View Middle Schools) Plan for 2014 sidewalk /other NMTF projects • Birchcrest B Neighborhood: Valley View & Normandale Road Sidewalks • Strachauer Park D Neighborhood: W. 62nd Street Sidewalk • Morningside B Neighborhood: W. 42nd Street, Alder Drive & Scott Terrace Sidewalks • Ped- activated overhead mounted flasher: mid -block crossing at 691h (Southdale- Galleria) Medium -Long Term • Prepare Living Streets Plan and coordinate with PACS Fund (Sidewalk Priority Plan) • Determine priority projects for future years • Update Sidewalk /Pedestrian Facilities map • Prepare for Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan update • Develop public input /outreach procedure 2014 Work Plan Update Director Houle said the only change was to the France Avenue Intersections Improvement Project to reflect the construction delay until 2014. He said they will need to finalize the plan and recommendation to City Council by August. Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 3, 2013 Brief discussion ensued regarding Sections A.1, A.2, and C.1. Updates Student Members - None ti Bike Edina Task Force Member Janovy said they continue to have discussion on their bylaws and to work on the Bicycle Community Friendly application. Living Streets Working Group Chair Nelson said on July 16, they updated the City Council on the draft Living Streets Policy and on their visits to boards and commissions that they've presented the policy to. He said.the City Council approved the Living Streets Advisory Group and they are looking for volunteers; currently, there are approximately 10 -12 volunteers and they will begin meeting soon. Members Bass and Janovy suggested creating a Living Streets work plan that would include projects that other boards and commissions are working on that are Living Streets related. Chair Nelson will draft an email to the chairs of other boards and commissions to this effect. Transportation Options Working Group Member Whited said their next phase is to work on funding thru the Health.and Human Services grant process which is due August,31. Discussion "ensued regarding whether or not to keep the working group going and.the'conclusion was that the working group had completed its work'. After discussion, motion was made by member'Whited to disband the Transportation Options Working Group and the motion was seconded by member LaForce. All voted aye. Motion carried. Communications Committee a. Community Transformation Grant Member Bass said the $5,000 grant she referred to last month was the Statewide Health Improvement Program grant and not the Community Transformation Grant. She said they are discussing ways to use the funds and will have an update in August. Member La Force asked for an update on the communications plan for the France Avenue Intersections Improvement that they reviewed and offered comments on. Director Houle said the plan is not finalized yet because they are still working on the urban design piece. He said they are moving forward on generating the Frequently Asked Questions and it will be routed to the committee for review before being posted to the website. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence relating to transportation issues — A letter was received from resident Dr. Frank Wei requesting a sidewalk on 66`h St W. Director Houle said this location is not on the Sidewalk Plan and it is not scheduled for reconstruction any time soon. Member lyer said the location would make a good network connection. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member lyer said he would like to participate in the Living Streets Advisory Group but not as a volunteer. Member Whited asked Director Houle when 58`h St. W. is scheduled for reconstruction because the asphalt is eroding. He said it is scheduled for 2014. Chair Nelson said on 66`h St. W., west of TH -100, there is quite a large bump in the road. Director Houle will check to see what has caused the bump. 2 Member Laforce asked if there were any crash data for Benton Ave as you exit TH -100 south. He said this intersection continues to be unsafe. Member Janovy added that it is too wide for a two -lane roadway. Director Houle said he will add this intersection to their workload for evaluation. Member Janovy said she submitted a sidewalk petition to City Council on July 16. She asked if it could be incorporated into the 2014 project that is scheduled. Director Houle said staff knew the petition was coming and is already working to see if it can be incorporated. STAFF COMMENTS • Commissioner Braden resigned effective today. • The neighborhood reconstruction projects are progressing on schedule despite the weather. • The School Road sidewalk RFP was approved by City Council July 16. • One bid was received for France Avenue Intersections Improvements and it was $600,000 higher than estimated; staff consulted with MnDOT to see if the federal funds would be affected if they were to reject the bid and rebid; this is not the case and on July 16, City Council accepted staff's recommendation to rebid in the fall with construction in 2014. A second meeting was held for the Urban Design piece of this project and a third is scheduled for August 21, 7 -9 p.m. • Hennepin County is still on schedule to mill and overlay Vernon Avenue; the Penn Avenue Bridge redecking is starting Monday, July 22- October 22, and traffic is detoured to Xerxes Avenue. Xerxes Avenue Bridge will be redecked next year and staff is continuing to work with the County to improve lane designs. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE = 2013 NAME TERM J F M A M J J I A S O N D Work Session # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 7116 1 7 88% Braden, Ann' 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% Franzen, Nathan 2/1 /2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% I er, I er 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1 /2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Schwei er, Steven student 1 1 1 3 38% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% S anhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 3 50 °/a Whited, Courtney 2/1 /2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 9:21 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 9:21 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Meeting Agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 6, 2013 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for August 6, 2013. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR 5146 EDEN AVENUE CHANGE OF SCOPE AUTHORIZED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf noted the HRA engaged Braun Intertec to conduct a Phase I environmental assessment of the former Public Works site prior to demolition. During the demolition, Braun was also tasked with monitoring soil conditions for signs of contamination. The cost of this original work was $16,950.00. During the demolition process, environmental contamination (petroleum products and hydraulic fluid) was discovered. This was documented as Leak # 19190. In order to complete the professional services and secure approvals from the MPCA, Mr. Neuendorf stated it was necessary to expand Braun's scope of work. The expanded scope of services would include: final oversight of petroleum remediation, documentation of remaining hydraulic fluid, testing for any remaining petroleum contamination and application for partial reimbursement from the MN Department of Commerce Petro -Fund. The cost of these additional services has been proposed at $21,005.10 resulting in a total contract amount of $37,955.10. Mr. Neuendorf said funds were anticipated to come from the remaining Grandview TIF assets with a portion possibly reimbursed from the MN Petro -Fund. Motion made by Commissioner Brindle seconded by Commissioner Sprague aem'w# approving the change of scope of services and authorizing the HRA Chair and Executive Director to execute the necessary agreements with Braun Intertec and to apply for reimbursement through the MN Petro -Fund. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director w e �, O � tl� o �•,�roRPOiiP'�� 1888 To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA V. From: Bill Neuendorf /%-� Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: September 17, 2013 Information Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -13, Authorizing the Acquisition of a Fee Simple Interest in Property Located at 3944 West 49-1/2 Street Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: After many years in business, the owners have retired and closed the Hooten Dry Cleaning business located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street. This site is located immediately adjacent to the North Parking Ramp that provides public parking for the employees and customers located at the 50th and France Business District. City staff has been in contact with the property owners for several months as they contemplated closing the business. Efforts to acquire the property through a negotiated sale have not been successful. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) intends to use its condemnation authority to acquire the site while the building is without active businesses. The acquisition will allow the City /HRA to expand public parking options for the business district. The first floor of the expanded parking ramp may also include space for future municipal liquor operations. This authorization is requested after the owners and other interested parties have had an opportunity to voice their opinions in a Public Hearing. Attachments: HRA Resolution No. 2013 -13 City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 t HRA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-13 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3944 WEST 49 -1/2 STREET WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), owns and operates an off - street parking facility known as the North Parking Ramp at 3936 -3940 West 49 -1/2 Street ( "North Parking Ramp ") to provide public parking in the 501h and France business district; WHEREAS, the City of Edina ( "City ") and the HRA have studied the parking availability for the 50th and France business district and have determined that additional public parking is needed to support the continued success of this district; WHEREAS, the HRA has determined that expansion of the North Parking Ramp is necessary to provide additional public parking; WHEREAS, the HRA has determined that acquisition of a fee simple interest in the single story building located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street, immediately west of the North Parking Ramp, is necessary to expand the North Parking Ramp to provide additional public parking; WHEREAS, the business owners have closed the business formerly operated at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street; WHEREAS, the City owns and operates a municipal liquor store at 3943 West 50th Street and has further determined that it may be necessary in the future to relocate said liquor store to a new location within the 50th and France business district; WHEREAS, a portion of the property at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street could be used to relocate the municipal liquor store currently located at 3943 West 50th Street, while still using the remainder of the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street site for expansion of the North Parking Ramp; WHEREAS the City and HRA have been negotiating with the owners of 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property to acquire a fee simple interest in said property and to date have not entered into an agreement to acquire said property; WHEREAS, in order to construct the expansion of the North Parking Ramp and to have a site available for the possible relocation of the Edina municipal liquor store currently located at 3943 West 50th Street, it will be necessary to procure the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property through the right of eminent domain; and WHEREAS, the construction of the expansion of the North Parking Ramp makes it necessary for the City and HRA to acquire the 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street property as soon as possible, and no later than April 1, 2014, and in order to construct such improvements on a timely basis it will be necessary to procure the required property interest through a "quick take" condemnation action, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE HRA, that in order to expand the North Parking Ramp and obtain a site for the possible relocation of the municipal liquor store, the HRA proceed to acquire the required fee simple interest in the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street under its power of eminent domain and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042, having first fulfilled the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.036 and all other necessary requirements for the exercise of eminent domain power; and that the attorneys for the HRA be instructed and directed to advise and assist the HRA with regard to fulfilling any necessary legal conditions for the initiation of an eminent domain action, and to file the necessary petition or petitions therefore and to prosecute such action or actions to a successful conclusion, or until it is abandoned, dismissed or terminated by the HRA or the Court; and that the attorneys for the HRA and the Commissioners, employees and agents of the HRA do all things necessary to be done in the commencement, prosecution and successful termination of such eminent domain proceedings; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it is hereby found and declared that the acquisition of a fee simple interest in the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street by the HRA under its power of eminent domain is necessary to expand the North Parking Ramp and to obtain a site for possible relocation of the municipal liquor store. Dated: September 17, 2013. Attest: Ann Swenson, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR James B. Hovland, Chair I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of September 17, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Executive Director To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA VI From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 17, 2013 Informitlon ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2013 -14 Authorizing Redemption of Series 20098 Bonds Action Requested: I ,recommend that the HRA Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -14 Related to Taxable Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009B; Approving the Redemption Thereof Information / Background: The City Council has within its agenda on the September 17 meeting to award the sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A to effect the current refunding of the HRA's Taxable Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 20098. The 2009B bonds were originally issued through the HRA and as such the HRA needs to adopt a resolution to redeem the 2009B bonds. The 2009B bonds were issued as Build America Bonds to be reimbursed in part from the United States Treasury. The bonds became callable when the United States Treasury failed to make the cash subsidy payment to which the authority was entitled on August 1, 2013 due to sequestration. Attachments: Resolution 2013 -14 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION NO. 2013-14 RESOLUTION RELATED TO TAXABLE PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 200913; APPROVING THE REDEMPTION THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority "), as follows: Page 2 Section 1. Recitals. The Authority has issued its $6,125,000 Taxable Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009B (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations) (Build America Bonds— Direct Payment) dated, as�originally issued, as of November 24, 2009 (the "Series 2009 Bonds "), to finance a portion of the construction of the portion of the public works facility (the "Public Works Facility ") of the City of Edina (the "City ") which is,leased by the Authority to the City of Edina (the "City "), pursuant to a Lease Agreement, dated November 1;.2009 (the "Lease "), between the Authority, as lessor, and the City, as lessee. The City is issuing its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A (the "Series 2013 Bonds "), and upon the issuance of the Series 2013 Bonds will purchase the Public Works Facility from the Authority as provided in the Lease. The purchase price of the Public Works Facility received by the Authority will be applied to pay and redeem all Series 2009 Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2014 on November 1, 2013 (the "Redemption Date "). The Series 2009 Bonds are subject to redemption since the United States of America failed to make a subsidy payment to which the Authority was entitled with respect to interest payable on the Series 2009 Bonds on August 1, 2013, and such failure was not caused by any action or inaction of the Authority. Section 2. Payment and Redemption of Series 2009B Bonds. Upon receipt by the Authority of the purchase price of the Facilities from the City, the Authority shall deposit the purchase price of the Facilities with U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the Series 2009 Bonds to be used to pay and redeem the outstanding principal of the Series 2009 Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2014 on the Redemption Date. The redemption of the Series 2009 Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2014 on the Redemption Date is hereby approved. ADOPTED by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority this 17`h day of September, 2013. Attest: Its Executive Director Its Chair