Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012-05-15 COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MAY 15, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of May 1, 2012 and Work Session of May 1, 2012, B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 05/03/2012, TOTAL $1,088,529.65 and Per Pre -List Dated 05/10/12 TOTAL $1,052,467.62 and Credit Card Transactions Dated 2/28/12 — 3/27/12 $16,075.73 C. Resolution No. 2012 -62 Denying Preliminary Plat, Subdivision & Variances, JMS, Brookview Avenue D. First Reading & Waiver of Second Reading: Ordinance. No. 2012 -12 Amending Section 150 Personnel Policy E. Resolution No. 2012 -77 — Authorizing Grant Agreement With Hennepin County — Municipal Recycling Collection Program F. Resolution No. 2012 -78 Designating No Parking On Tracy Avenue From Vernon Avenue To Benton Avenue G. Request For Purchase —One (1) 2013 Ford Police Vehicle —Police Department H. Request For Purchase— Furniture —Police Department I. Request For Purchase — Bituminous Pathway Renovation — Rosland Park J. Request For Purchase — City of Edina Wireless Networks K. Request For Purchase — Braemar Golf Dome Fabric & Artificial Turf Removal Agenda/Edina City Council May 15, 2012 Page 2 L. Resolution No. 2012 -80 Setting June 19, 2012 Hearing Date For Consideration of Vacation Of Public Right-Of -Way, Portions Of Natchez Avenue & West 41" Street V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public.Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony'after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as. your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a. respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing. or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING —Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements, Imp. BA -382, Resolution No. 2012 -74, (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING - Bike Boulevard Improvement A -238, Resolution No. 2012 -75 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The. Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or' Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2012 -79 Expressing Support For The Purchase of Products Containing only Conflict -free Minerals B. Resolution No. 2012 76 Accepting Various Donations r Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Wed Tues Tues Mon Mon Tues Tues _ues Ion Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda/Edina City Council May 15, 2012 Page 3 C. Authorize Residential Curbside Recycling Contract Negotiations IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS May 15 Joint Work Session — Art Center Board 5:30 P.M. May 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. May 28 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jun 5 Work Session — Infrastructure Finance 5:30 P.M. Jun 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jun 19 Joint Work Session — Edina Community Health 5:30 P.M. Jun 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jul 3 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. Jul 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jul 17 Work Session — Business Meeting/Work Plan 5:30 P.M. Jul 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Aug 6 Joint Work Session — Heritage Preservation Board 5:30 P.M. Aug 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Aug 14 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY— POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Aug 21 Work Session — TBD 5:30 P.M. Aug 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Sept 3 LABORR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed . Sept 4 Work Session — TBD 5:30 P.M. Sept 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Sept 18 Work Session — TBD 5:30 P.M. Sept 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 1, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. lll. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda as revised to add Item V.D., Resolution No. 2012 -72, Recognizing the City's Quasquicentennial and the Work of the Edina Historical Society and its Quasquicentennial Committee; and to consider Item VI.B., Public Hearing - Temporary Intoxicating Liquor License — Chamber of Commerce prior to Item VI.A., Public Hearing continued from April 17, 2012 — Preliminary Plat with Lot Area and Lot Width Variances, 6120 Brookview Avenue, JMS Custom Homes., Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove. Items IV.A., Approval of Minutes — Regular and Work Session Meeting Minutes of April 17, 2012, and Town Hall Meeting Minutes of April 14, 2012; IV.C., Consideration of Ordinance No. 2012 -11 CSO /Parking Attendant Amendment Including Waiver of Second Reading; IV.D., Resolution No. 2012 -68 Receiving Feasibility Study for Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements, Imp. BA -382; IV.E., Resolution No. 2012 -69, Receiving Plans for Bike Boulevard Improvements, Imp. A -238; IV.F., Proposed Urban Planner for France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Improvements; and, IV.G., Modifications to Edina Emerald Energy Program to Include Apartments as Eligible Properties under the Program, as follows: IV A AppraffiVa- of Minutes RegulaF 2-Ad- INn-A Ska-ssien Meeting Minutes ef APF81 17, 2012, and TeWR Y +11 Meeting Minutes of April 14, 2 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in-detail on the Check Register dated April 19, 2012, and consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $370,487.12; Police Special Revenue $1,582.93; Pik Debt Service Fund $126.38; Working Capital Fund $931.17; Equipment Replacement Fund $12,213.08; Art Center Fund $2,378.85; .Golf` Dome Fund $3,206.10; Aquatic Center Fund $1,243.53; Golf Course Fund $34,154.63; Ice Arena Fund $10,022.47; Edinborough Park Fund $11,908.35,' 11,908.35 'Centennial Lakes Park Fund $8,540.96; Liquor Fund $227,055.76; Utility Fund $287,100:54; Recycling Fund $39,958.20; "'PSTF Agency Fund $4,636.39; TOTAL $1.015,546.46 and for approval of'payme'nt of claims dated April 26, 2012, and consisting of 28 pages; General Fund $139,647.87; Working Capital Fund $6,788.06; Equipment Replacement Fund $22,243.89; Art Center Fund $5,822.20; Golf Dome Fund $92.19; Aquatic Center Fund $1,416.65; Golf Course Fund $20,944.74; Ice Arena Fund $1,207.73; Edinborough Park Fund $4,254.03; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,298.77; Liquor Fund $150,272.16; Utility Fund $375,095.75; Storm Sewer Fund $2,443.49; Recycling Fund $3,838.00; PSTF Agency Fund $357.93; Payroll Fund $51325.85; TOTAL $744.049.31 .g 1110 Rprmh-teaA hia 2 12-fig Rpcp*-; ing Feasibility Study f9F GallagheF DFO e Roadway and Nine Mile r.e.e if Re gi. Ral T-Fail 1'w.wre yeMents 1..,.. QA_ZQ9 Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 1. 2012 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA W.A. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2012 — APPROVED AS REVISED WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2012, AND TOWN HALL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 14,.2012 — APPROVED AS SUBMITTED It was'noted the Grandview District public hearing testimony contained additional detail over the, standard minute format indicating: "addressed the Council." .Member Bennett stated she had provided condensed detail so the minutes would be more informative and because the webstream was sometimes difficult to access. Following discussion, majority Council consensus supported the minutes reflecting consistent formatting for all public. hearings and indicated this issue would be discussed at :a future Work Session. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the Regular Meeting minutes of April 17, 2012, striking Grandview District public hearing comments and retaining the standard format until the Council has an opportunity to discuss minute format, correcting "LaMontague" to "Spalon Montage," and Page 10,'Line 9, striking the word "since." Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the Work Session meeting minutes of April 17, 2012,.and Town Hall meeting minutes of April 14, 2012, as.submitted. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2012-11 ADOPTED — CSO /PARKING ATTENDANT AMENDMENT Police Chief Long presented the draft ordinance and indicated it reflected current practice. Mayor Hovland made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2012 -11, amending the Edina City Code concerning control of traffic and vehicles. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. D. RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -68 — ADOPTED — RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR GALLAGHER DRIVE ROADWAYAND NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS, IMP. BA -382 IV.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -69 — ADOPTED — RECEIVING PLANS FOR BIKE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS, IMP. A -238. IV.F. PROPOSED URBAN PLANNER FOR FRANCE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS — APPROVED With regard to Items IV.D. and IV.E., the Council requested receipt of Transportation Commission meeting minutes in advance, so it was aware of comments and concerns related to those projects. With regard to item W.F., the Council acknowledged a Response for Proposal was not used and while it found the credentials of the urban planning team to be impressive, wanted to assure "urban design" was adequately addressed.. The Council's intention was to address a wider context of the corridor roadway and neighborhood connections beyond the three intersections, to assure the use of best practices, and Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 1. 2012 incorporate designs proven to have worked elsewhere. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -68, receiving feasibility report for Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements, Imp. BA -382; and, Resolution No 2012 -69, receiving plans for Bike Boulevard Improvements, Imp. A -238, and approving proposed Urban Planner for engineering services for France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Improvement. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.G. MODIFICATIONS TO EDINA EMERALD ENERGY PROGRAM TO INCLUDE APARTMENTS AS ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES UNDER THE PROGRAM — APPROVED The Council asked staff to contact the condominium owners within the Housing Improvement Area that had previously made a similar request and determine. if interest remained. Member Swenson made a 'motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving.modifications to the Edina Emerald Energy Program to include apartments as eligible properties under the Program. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. HERITAGE PRESERVATION MONTH PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read the proclamation in full. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving proclamation declaring May 2012 as Heritage Preservation Month in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried.. V.B. HERITAGEAWARD Associate Planner Repya described the heritage of the Convention Grill,and announced it was the recipient of the 2012 Heritage Award. On behalf of Convention Grill's owner, John Rimarcik, his son Tony Rimarcik along with long time employee Shawn Schmitz accepted the Heritage Award. Also attending to celebrate the award were two gentlemen, Nick Santrizos, son of the Grill's original owner and Nick Santrizos, nephew of Nick and also grandson of the Grills original owner. All present thanked the City for the Heritage Award. The Council and audience responded with a round of applause. V.C. LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL WEEK PROCLAMATION Mayor Hovland read the proclamation in full. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving proclamation declaring May 1S, 2012, as Peace Officers Memorial Day and May 13 through May 19, 2012, as Police Week in,the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Police Chief Long accepted the proclamation, thanked the Council for this recognition and announced planned events including "Coffee with the Chief." V.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-72 ADOPTED — EDINA QUASQUICENTENNIAL Mayor Hovland read the resolution in full. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -72, recognizing the City's Quasquicentennial and the work of the Edina Historical Society and its Quasquicentennial Committee. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City,touncil /May 1, 2012 Ruth Valgemae, representing the Quasquicentennial Committee, accepted the resolution, announced planned celebration ;events and encouraged all to participate. Quasquicentennial Committee Members were acknowledged and thanked. Vt. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of-Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.B. TEMPORARY INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE — CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — APPROVED Police Chief Long presented the request of the Edina Chamber of Commerce for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the May 17, 2012, Taste of. Edina event and recommended approval conditioned on the sale being limited to beer and wine. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Public.Testimonv No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving Temporary Intoxicating Liquor License for the Chamber of Commerce for its Taste of Edina event on May 17, 2012, 4:30 -7:30 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Arrie Larsen Manti, Chamber of Commerce President, advised of planned events and encouraged participation. VI.A. CONTINUED FROM APRIL 17, 2012 — PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH VARIANCES, 6120 BROOKVIEW AVENUE, JMS CUSTOM HOMES — REFERRED TO STAFF TO DRAFT FINDINGS FOR DENIAL Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the request of JMS Custom Homes to subdivide the property and. create a new, 50 -foot lot north of the existing home. The request includes a subdivision for two lots, lot width variance from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot, lot area variance from 9,000 square feet to 6,676 and 6,671 square feet, and a minor lot depth variance from 133.8 to 133.7 feet for Lot 2. Mr. Teague presented the required variance criteria and advised staff and the Planning Commission found the request does not meet variance criteria and recommended denial subject to findings as contained in the staff report and Planning Commission meeting minutes. Proponent Presentation Jeff Schoenwetter, representing JMS Custom Homes, stated JMS valued its relationship with the City and planned to continue its'endeavors in Edina. He indicated this property was originally platted in the 1920s as two 50 -foot lots and had water and sewer utilities for two lots, so it was anticipated each 50 -foot property would accommodate its own home, much like other 50 -foot lots in this neighborhood. He indicated the immediate lots tor the west and south were 50 -foot home sites, as part of the Pamela Park neighborhood. Mr. Schoenwetter stated the JMS's rationale for considering that a "neighborhood" was larger than a single block. Mr. Schoenwetter suggested that for thoughtful development and reasonable investments, all 50 -foot lots must be available for redevelopment and that most builders in his opinion were consistently honing skills to build exceptional homes on 50- foot.lots without variance. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 1, 2012 ,Mr. Schoenwetter presented slides and commented on how this plat was developed over the years, the area zoning mix that included residential, apartments, duplex, and commercial zoning within 100 feet to the south of the subject site. He noted the Fairfax plat had 85.7% 50 -foot lots, exactly as proposed. He displayed the plat and described the location of 50 -foot lots, slightly larger lots, commercial, park properties, noting there was only one historically extra -large lot representing less than one -half a percent of the total lots in the neighborhood. In addition, only 3% of the lots were over 100 feet 'in width. Mr. Schoenwetter then displayed video of Janey Westin stating the Westins combined their property with the lot next door to make a conforming lot, and a slide of the side yard noting it had similar setbacks to the home that was built. He then presented video of Council's debate of variance criteria and approval of a similar subdivision request to create two 50 -foot lots and lot width and lot area variances. Mr. Schoenwetter presented letters and video comments by area neighbors and the Planning Commission Chair supporting the JMS application.. He suggested the vision of the future was shared by many, and approval of the requested subdivision would assure a smaller home was built on this.lot. The proposed house would have 1,140 square feet on the first floor with a price point under $600,000. Mr. Schoenwetfer-indicated the existing 2 -story house had 1,400 square feet on first floor, 4 bedrooms, and was selling for $699,000. Mayor Hovland indicated the public hearing was continued from April 17, 2012, and invited additional public testimony at 8:22 p.m. Public Testimony Jackie Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Dick Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Mickie Turk, 6141 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Laney Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Carol Carmichiel, 6112 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Jerrod Lindquist, 5945 Concord Avenue, addressed the Council. Danny Uhrhammer, 6101 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council addressed issues raised during public testimony and questions asked of Messrs. Teague and Knutson relating to the original platting of this area. Mr. Teague explained the original two 50 -foot lots were combined and the original house was constructed in the middle of the 100 -foot lot. When that property was listed for sale, a similar subdivision request for two 50 -foot lots was under consideration by the Planning Commission; however, the application was withdrawn prior to action and, at that point, the property was sold to JMS. For the current house, a survey had beeri'submitted and was approved based on that survey information. Construction began and a complaint was registered that the setback had not been met. Staff investigated, discovered the setback was off eight to fine feet and issued a stop work order. JMS was told it could meet the required setback or apply for a front yard variance. JMS applied for a variance through the Zoning Board of Appeals, which was denied. JMS then successfully sued the City so the current house existed as a legal non - conforming house. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 1. 2012 The Council discussed the zoning regulation at the time the area was platted and change instituted in 1951 increasing the minimum lot width to 75 feet. Mr. Teague stated two plated lots combined into a single lot cannot then be re- subdivided if it resulted in the creation of a subminimum lot without a variance. In neighborhoods where lots.exceed 9,000 square feet in size, 75 feet in width, or 130 feet in depth_, the median lot size was established based on lots within 500 feet of the subject site. The Council noted code guided the formation of larger than minimum sized lots but does not contemplate the creation of subminimum lots. The Council expounded on its finding that the requested subdivision would not satisfy required variance standards: there were no circumstances unique to the property that called for. variance- consideration, it was a self- created hardship, and' reasonable, use existed since the property already contained a house. In addition, the Council took exception to the proponent's claim.that the subject lot was surrounded by 50- foot lots, noting the adjoining lots to the north, south, and across the street were as large,as,or larger than the subject 100 -foot lot.. Thus, the creation of two 50 -foot lots would be out of character. with the neighborhood. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, referring:the request of JMS Custom Homes for preliminary plat with lot area and lot width variances at 6120 Brookview`Avenue to staff to draft findings for denial for consideration at the May 151" 2012, Council meeting.. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion.carried. VI.C. LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH NUISANCE ABATEMENT NO. 18165 — RESOLUTION NO. 2012-70 ADOPTED Community Health Administrator Engelman recommended levying Abatement No. 18165 in the amount of $9,893.66 to abate a public nuisance condition. She reported the resident moved back into the property the -end of November 2011. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:11 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced. and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -70; levying special assessments for garbage and debris removal improvements, and directing Bloomington Health Care follow up with the resident in question. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. Vlll. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS In consideration of those in attendance, Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, amending the agenda to consider Item VIII.C., Hornets' Nest Proposal, prior to Item VIII.A., Ordinance No. 2012 -10 Amending Section 900 Discount Pricing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. C. HORNET'S NEST PROPOSAL — SUPPORTED IN CONCEPT Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 1. 2012 Manager Neal introduced the item and stated the intention was that the City Council discuss the Hornet's Nest proposal and make a determination. If endorsed for advancement, additional regulatory steps would be required including Planning Commission review and noticed public hearing. Ellen Jones, 5261 Lochloy Drive, Park Board Vice Chair and Working Group Chair, reported on the Park Board's rational to recommend supporting the Hornet's Nest proposal. Eric Anderson, 6501 Indian Hills Road, representing Drive for the Hive, a nonprofit organization, thanked the Park Board and staff for its assistance with this project. He advised of the need to address and update Braemar West Arena hockey and figure skating facilities and presented the Hornet's Nest proposal for a two -story, 26,450 square -foot addition estimated at $3.2 million. Mr. Anderson presented a financial summary, indicating Drive for the Hive would solicit 25% of the project cost through private donations, and request financing of $2.2 million with the debt amortized over a 20 -year period. This would result in 25% equity and 75% debt to be financed. He then presented projected revenue and cash flow that would be used to pay operating expenses and retire the debt, noting there would be a slight negative cash flow in early years but Braemar Arena staff believed the training facility would produce additional revenue in addition to dues charged to the Edina Hockey Association and Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club that would create a positive cash flow. The Council asked questions of Mr. Anderson relating to the location of similar facilities and conditional recommendation of the Park Board. Mr. Anderson stated he had no concerns over the recommended conditions and advised that Drive for the Hive currently had private pledge commitments for $275,000 of the $740,000 to be raised. In addition, Rich Meyer a 20 -year professional fundraiser had volunteered to help guide fund raising efforts. Mr. Anderson explained that value engineering of the project resulted in reducing the size of the structure and lowered the project cost by $1 million. It was the intention that the capital reserve would be used for future repairs and maintenance. The Council continued its discussion of the proposed project, how ice time would be scheduled and indicated there was a need to develop a priority use policy for this facility. It was noted if the use of the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club declined and the $20 per player per year surcharge was not paid, it would represent a small portion ($4,000 /year) of the excess cash flow being generated. Mr. Neal explained that if the Council supported moving this proposal forward, it would be subject to the same regulatory processes as other land use considerations. Park Director Keprios presented additional proposed improvements to update and revitalize Braemar Arena should the Hornet's Nest project go forward: to relocate the West Arena Zamboni Room estimated at $255,045 to resolve safety hazards; additional lower level lobby space estimated at $42,000; create player /coach /staff accessible path estimated at $161,000; and create standing room only area at $23,300; totaling $481,345. Mr. Keprios provided a budget summary and cash flow balance summary, with and without improvements. He then presented the recommendation of the Park Board to move forward with the Hornet's Nest proposal subject to conditions detailed in the staff report. It was noted that if approved by the City Council, the proposal to rezone the park property for retail and dry-la,nd training (Public Leasing) and signage would be considered by the Planning Commission on May 23, 2012; the dry-land training vendor would not be open to the public during High School 'hockey games (no need for transportation or parking study); and rezoning and the project public hearing could be scheduled as early as the June 5, 2012, Council meeting. Mr. Keprios indicated issues remaining to be resolved are the type of agreement with Drive for the Hive and City of Edina and whether Drive for the Hive could act as construction manager for no fee. He extended his appreciation to all who had participated in this consideration. The Council referenced the City's policy relating to recognition of contributions, and reluctance was expressed to consider naming this facility for a donor since it was a City -owned property. The Council Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 1. 2012 considered the responsibility for the ingress /egress of the Zamboni room and ADA pathway. Since the Hornet's Nest proposal necessitated a longer extension of the ADA pathway, it was suggested that cost should be prorated. Mr. Anderson indicated Drive for the Hive' would be willing to work through those issues. The Council noted the proposed lease term was ten years, while the bond term was 20 years. Mr. Anderson explained that 20 -year leases were not commonplace in the market for this type of use. The Council noted the retail component at Braemar was operated by the City and it did not have a policy for privatization on public land. Mr. Anderson stated he had researched the principle behind allowing a commercial entity on public land and encouraged the Council to consider the National Parks Service policy that allowed private enterprise on public land, striking the correct balance between privatization and preservation, while ,providing a.,better experience for its, visitors. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving Hornets' Nest concept subject to: 1. The project must . receive all required municipal land use regulatory approvals from the City 2. Drive, for the Hive organization entering into memorandum of understanding approved by the City Council that formally established respective roles and responsibilities of both parties to accomplish this project 3. Vendors, School District, and pertinent sports organizations must enter into agreements acceptable to the City relative to lease or use of the facility, or portions thereof 4. Drive.for the Hive must raise $739,314.83 in private donations S. Vendors for the dry-land training facility and the sporting goods retail store must commit to a minimum ten -year lease 6. The Edina School Board of Education must agree to an additional ice rental surcharge and restructuring to the spectator fee distribution for High School hockey games at Braemar Arena to help cover locker room operating expenses 7. The Edina Hockey Association must agree to a $20 per player per year surcharge for a 20 -year period (the life of the bonds) 8. The Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club must agree to a $20 per player per year surcharge for a 20 -year period (the life of the bonds) Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIILA. ORDINANCE NO. 2012-10 —ADOPTED —AMENDING SECTION 900.12(7) DISCOUNT PRICING Chemical Health Coordinator Iverson presented the research and findings of the Edina Health Partners Coalition and noted the greatest concern was that any discount pricing be sensitive to not promote increased alcohol use and to support responsible alcohol use. The Council discussed the ordinance amendment and asked questions of staff. Mr. Neal indicated this process started at the request of the Restaurant Association, and the proposed ordinance amendment was drafted by staff based on Ms. Iverson's research. It was noted the amendment would regulate practices of selling and serving alcoholic drinks but would not regulate the price, which was difficult to regulate successfully. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2012 -10, amending the Edina City Code concerning liquor. Member Sprague seconded the motion. The Council continued its discussion of the amendment and indicated support to consider the food to alcohol percentage requirement at a future meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. PRIORITY USE OF THE EDINA AQUATIC CENTER FACILITIES POLICY AND RELATIONSHIP DOCUMENT— APPROVED Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 1. 2012 .Mr. Keprios presented staff's recommendation to adopt the proposed Priority Use of the Edina Aquatic Center Facility Policy and Relationship Document that reflected a 75% residency requirement for the Edina Swim Club and granting it first priority access. In addition, the Edina Swim Club must maintain its status as a nonprofit corporation in accordance with Minnesota law, and may not discriminate based on ability; however, may make team assignments based on demonstrated ability to swim 25 yards in both the freestyle and backstroke. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving priority use of the Edina Aquatic Center Facilities Policy and Relationship Document, with corrections to grammar and capitalization. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-73 ADOPTED —SOUTHWEST TWIN CITIES YELLOW RIBBON COALITION Member Brindle stated this matter was brought to her att ention by Scott McDonald, Rotary Club President. She explained the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Program,, a community support program for families of deployed military service members, and described the need for this support program, services offered, and formation of a six —city Yellow Ribbon Coalition operated by a steering committee. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 =73, proposal to participate in the proposed Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Program Coalition. Member Bennett seconded the motion. The Council discussed the Program and addressed the concern expressed relating to the level of City resources that would be committed. Mr. Neal explained that if approved, it would pledge the City's support for staff to meet with the other five cities forming the Southwest Twin Cities Yellow Ribbon Coalition to coordinate a support network with the private sector, identify volunteers and resources. The intent was to identify a network of existing services and create awareness of those services to military families. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-71 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -71 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received X.A. PREPARATION OF BRAEMAR ARENA USE POLICY DIRECTED Member Sprague noted there would be an increase in use requests should the Hornet's Nest proposal move forward and supported directing staff to prepare a Priority Use Policy for Braemar Arena for presentation to the Park Board. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, directing staff to prepare and present a Priority Use Policy for Braemar Arena to the Park Board for its recommendation to Council. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. X.B. WORK SESSION — SCHEDULED Page 9 Minutes /Edina Citv-Council /Mav 1.2012 Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, directing staff to schedule a work session to discuss Subdivision 3 of Liquor Ordinance 900.12, the 60 %/40% rule, and option of standardized reporting requirement based on sales tax with notification of meeting to stakeholders. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. X. C. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTE CONTENT SCHEDULED The consensus of the Council was to, hold discussion of :meeting minute format at the July 17, 2012, business meeting. Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 15, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the May 1, 2012, meeting available, Page 10 MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND 50T" AND FRANCE BUSINESS OWNERS HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 1, 2012 5:05 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Bennett entered the meeting, at 5:09 p.m. Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Wayne Houle, City Engineer; Karen Kurt, Assistant.City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Lisa Schaefer, Human Resources. Director; John Wallin, Finance Director. Consultants attending included: Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Mark Ruff, Ehlers and Associates; Mark Hansen and Steve Oliver, Mohagan.Hansen Architectural Group; and Scott Froemming, Walker Parking Consultants. Mayor Hovland noted the purpose of the work session was to review with potential improvements to the 50th & France Business District Parking Structures and streetscape improvements and to briefly review proposed changes to the City Code Section 150 Personnel Policy. Many representatives, both tenants and property owners were present from the 50th & France Business Association to respond to questions regarding the proposed parking ramp improvements. Engineer Houle, Mark Hansen, Steve Oliver and Scott Froemming gave a presentation outlining the 50th & France Parking structures and Streetscape Improvements. The project would include: removing the middle ramp and rebuilding it with a six -level ramp, five above -grade levels and one below - grade, refurbishing the north and south ramps, paver replacement, irrigation system, landscape replacements and seasonal lighting. Total costs were estimated at $13,679,858. Engineer Houle distributed response devices to the Council, the property owners and tenants, and audience members. Mr. Hansen, Mr. Oliver and Mr. Froemming reviewed 45 images of various parking ramps to which the group chose their response from: 1. Strongly Dislike, 2. Dislike, 3. Neutral, 4. Like or 5. 'Strongly Like. Following the presentation, the group discussed the potential project and its financial implications for the business owners and tenants. Lisa Schaefer, Human Resources Director, reviewed a proposed ordinance that would amend City Code Section 150. She explained that the current code contained the City's personnel policy and gave the reasons for removing the policy from the Code. Ms. Schaefer and Attorney Knutson explained the proposed ordinance amendment followed more closely the statutory Plan B format. Council's consensus was in agreement with the proposed amendment. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 1, 2012 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKREG LOG20000 51312012 1564255 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.60 187.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286752 043012 1600.6107 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 187.04 286755 1564256 5/1/2012 — 5/3/2012 51312012 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1, Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 358736 61112012 130185 GUENTHNER, JAMES 233,680.00 358743 1,591.21 PAYMENT ERROR REFUND 286837 042612 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND SENIOR CITIZENS 161.80 1,591.21 UB TEMP 286384 35341661 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 358737 51312012 100612 A.M.LEONARD,- 358744 51312012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 482.72 SOD CUTTER, BLADES 00002086 286673 0112049479 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 482.72 358738 51312012 101833 A.T.O.M. 5/112012 10:19:46 Page - 1 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 875.00 TRAINING CONFERENCE 286512 42944584,431554 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48 875.00 358739 51312012 100613 AAA 22.00 VEHICLE TABS 286680 042512 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 22.00 358740 51312012 100613 AAA 2,104.79 VEHICLE PLATES 286681 042612 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 2,104.79 .. 368741 51312012 1564255 125198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.60 187.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286752 043012 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 187.04 286755 1564256 358742 51312012 50TH ST SELLING 101304 ABM EQUIPMENTS SUPPLY 233,680.00 SEWER CLEANER 00001453 286436 111476 -00 5900.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 233,680.00 358743 51312012 116528 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 161.80 863.46 UB TEMP 286384 35341661 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 863.46 358744 51312012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL (BILLING) 66.00 286609 1564255 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.60 286754 1564263 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 21.20 286755 1564256 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 154.80 358745 51312012 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 161.80 COFFEE 286595 116528 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 161.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 2 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 358746- 61312012 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 74.62 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 286682 113361 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 74.62 358747 51312012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 161.27 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, WARNINGS 00005102 286683 AFS- 221010010 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 161.27 358748 51312012 102172 APPERT's,FOODSERVICE 572.34 FOOD 286550 1725076 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 454.13 FOOD 286684 1728982 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 443.02 FOOD 286685 1722999 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 644.68 FOOD 286686 1715945 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 2,114.17 358749 51312012 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 155.18 COFFEE 286649 423433 7411,6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 155.18 358750 61312012 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 331.00 FIRE TOWER CLEAN -UP 286650 1148705 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 331.00 358751 51312012 102660 AUDUBON INTERNATIONAL 200.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 286551 GC1689 - 2012 5410.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 200.00 358762 61312012 130184 AV REPAIR 496.00 CAMCORDER REPAIRS 00009147 286660 7834 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 496.00 358753 51312012 126019 B 8 8 PRODUCTS/ RIGS AND SQUA 115.00 SQUAD REPAIRS 286513 3701 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 115.00 358754 51312012 130182 BARTEL, LINDSAY 475.00 REFUND - OCT 13TH RENTAL 286647 042212 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 475.00 358755 613/2012 129649 BEHLEN, NATE 12.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286744 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 25.53 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286744 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS TRAINING 37.74 358756 51312012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 325.20 286610 73089000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 230.42 286756 6174800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 76,78 286757 86677100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 264.60 286758 73304000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 140.05 286759 73298900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 404.55 286760 73303900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 756.60 286761 73298700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 414.30 286762 73189300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 63.38 286763 86645200 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 99.55 286764 73303800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,775.43 368767 51312012 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLINVLUMBING 1,950.00 INSTALL, WATER LINE 286385 A90859 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 4,975.00 SEWER LINER REPLACEMENT 286385 A90859 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 6,925.00 358768 61312012 130069 BFG SUPPLY COMPANY 96.36 FOUNTAIN PARTS 00001459 286514 1275856 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 96.36 358759 51312012 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 27.79 KEYS 00001100 286386 S77080 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 27.79 358760 51312012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 57.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001457 286387 76666 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 37.53- RETURN 286388 5432CM 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.57 358761 51312012 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 3,912.16 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003776 286687 87355665 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 138.88 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003729 286688 80754008 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,051.04 358762 51312012 100668 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 1,519.21 PUMP 00005034 286437 624004 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.94 REGULATOR, O -RING 00005034 286438 92192SAV 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 4 • 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger. .Account Description Business Unit 64.09 ELEMENT 00005156` 286689 626653 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,626.24 368763 51312012 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 266.20 CANDY 286690 2340:031759 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 266.20 368764 61312012 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY ' 1,162.43 CARBIDE BITS, PINS r 286691 12186745 -00 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,162.43 358765 51312012 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 759.70 RIP RAP 00005152 286692 041512 1343.6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 759.70 358766 51312012 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 772.74 NEWSLETTER 00008272 286596 27749 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 772.74 368767 61312012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 11,292.55 266477 82571 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 78.95 286478 82572 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 772.90 286479 82574 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 47.85 286611 82573 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 12,192.25 358768 51312012 116683 CAT $ FIDDLE BEVERAGE 270.00 286612 93043. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 657.00 288613 93061 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.17 286765 93060. 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,016.17 358769 61312012 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 35.10 SHOVEL, UTILITY KNIFE 00001102 286389 1281802 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 92.64 CEMENT TOOLS 00001019 286390 1281803 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 616.66 SHOVELS, CURE & SEAL 00001097 286693 1281804 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 744.40 358770 51312012 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 2,709.72 5591458 -4 286391 559145811/12 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 884.88 5546504 -1 286392 5546504-4/12 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19.24 5528973 -0 286393 5528973 -4/12 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 5/1/2012 - 513/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 587.77 8034001 -1 286394 8034001 -4/12 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 44.73 5596524 -8 286597 5596524-4/12 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 53.28 5590919 -6 286651 5590919-4/12 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 14.51 5584310 -6 286652 5584310 -4112 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 471.83 5584304 -9 286653 5584304 -4/12 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 4,785.96 358771 51312012 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 187.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 286694 70205 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 187.00 358772 51312012 123898 CENTURYLINK 65.42 952 922 -2444 286515 2444 -4/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 114.41 952 920 -8166 286516 8166 -4/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 179.83 358773 51312012 119725 CHISA60 LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 120.90 286480 469932 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 394.99 286481 471189 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 515.89 358774 51312012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 85.78 00077443 - 0200650027 286517 200650027 -4/12 1646.6189 i SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 553.03 00101025- 0203600013 286518 0203600013 -4/12 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 26.36 00101025 - 0203610011 286519 0203610011 -4/12 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 665.17 358775 51312012 100692 COCA -COLA. REFRESHMENTS 275.20 286766 0198036526 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 275.20 358776 51312012 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 800.80 MAY 2012 MAINTENANCE 286439 MAY2012 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 800.80 358777 61312012 101974 CONNIE'S CATERING 3,023.67 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION 286395 CATERING 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 3,023.67 358778 51312012 101948 COUNTRY CLUB TURF 707.51 SOD 00002096 286674 2103 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,361.59 SOD 00002096 286675 2101 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page,- 6 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,069.10 368779 613/2012 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 384.60 STAFF UNIFORM SHIRTS 286695 15255 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS - 384.60 368780 61312012 104020 DALCO 292.41 TOWEL DISPENSERS, TISSUE 00001036 286520 2452902 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 213.53 TISSUE, CARPET CLEANER 00001454 286696, 2454516 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 505.94 358781 51312012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,330.80 286482 647764 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 286483 647765 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 588.10 286614 647763 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 43.90 286767 647761 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,010.65 286768 647762 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,018.25 '. 368782 61312012 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 67.41 SCREWDRIVERS, CRIMP TOOL 00005112 286440 684628 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 378.27 CHARGER 00005111 286441 684618 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 413.39 DIGITAL TIRE INFLATORS, WRENCM0001103 286697 683491 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 859.07 368783 61312012 100720 DENNYS1TH AVE. BAKERY 56.14 BAKERY 286552 407910 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 29.91 286553 408488 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 50.40, 286554 408645 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 77.63 286555 408855 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 214.08 358784 51312012 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,411.75 REFUSE 286598 1374548 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,382.87 REFUSE t'` 286599 1367593 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 5,794.62 358785 61312012 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 2,400.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES TIF PLAN 286505 1791506 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 4,050.00 PUBLIC MAINTENANCE CHARGE 286505 1791506 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 6,450.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/1/2012 — 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 358786 51312012 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 570.07 SIGN POST STABILIZERS 00001090 286396 0098694 -IN 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 570.07 358787 51312012 101667 EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT 3.50 EDINA DIALOGUE EVENT ONAPKINS 286502 112072 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3.50 358788 51312012 101407 EGAN; MATT - 53.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286748 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 53.28 358789 51312012 130181 ESTATE OF SHIRLEY MAILE BELL 606.74 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 286648 5537 WARDEN AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 606.74 368780 61312012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 53.91 FILTER ELEMENT 00005126 286698 69- 064448 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 53.91 358791 61312012 122549 FARNER- BOCKEN COMPANY 581.35 FOOD 286556 1180986 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 581.35 358792 513/2012 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 18.36 TRANSPORTATION CHARGES 286521 7- 864 -59282 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.36 358793 51312012 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 46.66 SAFETY POSTERS 00003007 286522 062200026045 1400.6575 PRINTING 46.66 368794 51312012 130180 FISHER CONSTRUCTION & RESTORAT 3,879.60 BOARD UP ROOF 00006486 286557 1200 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,879.60 358795 51312012 124798 FLESCH, SHIRLEY 197.24 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 286501 042412 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 197.24 358796 51312012 101476 FOOTJOY 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page- 7 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM TRAINING UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GOLF COURSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 324.91 MERCHANDISE 286558 4241694 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 110.00 CITY OF EDINA 358800 51312012 129797 GM CONTRACTING INC. Council Check Register 162,098.41 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation P0# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 324.91 358801 51312012 358797 51312012 130176 FRONT PORCH HOME REMODELING 64.67 LUNCH MEETING EXPENSE 55.40 PERMIT REFUND 286500 ED113745 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS 53.28 55.40 286751 042612 5919.6104 358798 51312012 117.95 100764 G & K SERVICES 18.50 SHOP RAGS 286559 1006670773 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 18.50 SHOP RAGS 286560 1006692599 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 286699 34025 37.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 850.00 358799 51312012 102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC 368803 6/312012 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page- 8 Business Unit INSPECTIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 110.00 INTERPRETER 286397 111591 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL WM499 RAW WATER WELL2 TO WTP6 TRAINING TRAINING GOLF ADMINISTRATION POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PSTF OCCUPANCY 110.00 358800 51312012 129797 GM CONTRACTING INC. 162,098.41 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 286676 050412 05499.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 162,098.41 358801 51312012 102540• •GOERGEN, DAVID 64.67 LUNCH MEETING EXPENSE 286737 042512 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 53.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286751 042612 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 117.95 358802 51312012 125935 GOLF SCORECARDS INC. 850.00 YARDAGE CARD PROJECT 00006490 286699 34025 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 850.00 368803 6/312012 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 275.00 MOTORCYCLE GRAPHICS 286398 80242 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 790.00 TRUCK GRAPHICS 286677 80325 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,065.00 358804 61312012 101103 GRAINGER 244.64 WET /DRY VAC 00001027 286399 9803537290 1646.6556 TOOLS 13.21 BARRICADE TAPE 00001198 286400 9805696656 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 152.53 SHELVING 00001198 286400 9805696656 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 318.20 FIRST AID CABINET 00001209 288401 9807479531 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 112.60 ' FIRST AID CABINET 00001209 286402 9807479515 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.63 SAFETY GLASSES 00005146 286442 9807968640 1646:6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 164.52 STRIPING PAINT 00006474 286561 9800771553 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.47 FLOOR ABSORBENT 286654 9810393109 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES WM499 RAW WATER WELL2 TO WTP6 TRAINING TRAINING GOLF ADMINISTRATION POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PSTF OCCUPANCY CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 5/1/2012 - 513/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 660.91 PAPER PLATES. UTENSILS 00005147 286700 9809003123 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,708.71 358805 51312012 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 87.00 286769 00028419 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 87.00 358806 61312012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 184.25 286615 138670 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 799.75 286770 138940 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,290.00 286771 138980 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE , YORK SELLING 2,274.00 358807 61312012 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 49.00 TASTING CUPS 286838 043012 5862.6406 GENERAL'SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 50.66 TASTING CUPS 286838 043012 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 65.50 TRASH BAGS 286838 043012 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 169.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286839 APR2012 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 334.44 358808 51312012 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 869.62 LAWN MOWING SUPPLIES 00001128 286523 15201 1641.6556 TOOLS MOWING 869.62 358809 51312012 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 4,900.00 _INSTALL OUTFIELD FIXTURES 00001776 286524 12 -3-27 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,650.00 LIGHTING REPAIRS 286655 11 -12 -56 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 2,305.67 LIGHTING REPAIRS 286656 11 -12 -30 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 8,855.67 358810 51312012 103725 HAMER, STEVE 53.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286746 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 53.28 3.58811 51312012 130142 _HAMMER RESIDENCES 58.00 ADAPTIVE PROGRAMS REFUND 286499 042312 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE,REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 58.00 358812 61312012 129929 HANLY, DUSTIN 12.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286743 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 25.53 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286743 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 37.74 R55CKREG LOG20000 MAR 2012 ROOM & BOARD 286525 1000015991 CITY OF EDINA BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 368817 51312012 116599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFF Council Check Register DWI C#11- 002413 286506 042512 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 240.00 5/1/2012 — 5/3/2012 286506 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2340.6103 358813 61312012 00001048 286678 125270 HARTFORD - PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 368818 61312012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,477.97 MAY 2012 286600 5865872 -5 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 286443 3,477.97 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 916.33 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 358814 61312012 1000.1303 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 1,943.18 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 286443 042412 5821.6103 1,742.90 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES 286601 042412 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL 4409.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 1,742.90 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 286443 042412 1503.6915 358815 51312012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 358819 51312012 a - 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 191.40 MEAT PATTIES 286701 023841 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 191.40 358816 613/2012 128208 HEINZMAN, DAN 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page- 10 Business Unit PAYROLL CLEARING SENIOR CITIZENS GRILL 12.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286742 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 12.21 MAR 2012 ROOM & BOARD 286525 1000015991 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 368817 51312012 116599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFF 21.09 DWI C#11- 002413 286506 042512 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 240.00 DWI C#11- 002300 - 286506 042512 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 725.38 DWI C#11 -001939 286506 042512 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 986.47 00001048 286678 13265 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 368818 61312012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 59.88 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 286443 042412 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 916.33 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 286443 042412 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 1,943.18 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 286443 042412 5821.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,647.84 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 286443 042412 4409.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 16,241.99 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 286443 042412 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 30,809.22 358819 51312012 a - 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER DWI FORFEITURE DWI FORFEITURE DWI FORFEITURE. VERNON OCCUPANCY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 50TH ST OCCUPANCY PAMELA PARK SA PREPAYMENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 4,947.46 MAR 2012 ROOM & BOARD 286525 1000015991 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 4,947.46 358820 51312012 102079 HIGHVIEW:PLUMBING INC 2,645.00 SEWERIWATER REPAIR 00001048 286678 13265 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 2,995.00 SEWERIWATER REPAIR 00001048 286678 13265 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 5,840.00 368821 6.1312012 104375 HOHENSTEINS IN_ C. 678.50 286484 598483 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER . YnRK SFi i iNr, R55CKREG LOG20000 781.76 RICOH TONER CITY OF EDINA 315245 5/1/2012 10:19:46 781.76 Council Check Register Page - 11 358825 51312012 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 5/1/2012 — 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 498.00 485.65 286772 598653 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 368826 1,115.50 286773 598650 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,292.00 2,056.64 MAIL WATER BILLS 286602 62357 5910.6103 358822 5/312012 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 358827 91.77 MAIL BOX, SEED 00001219 286702 17051 01370.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON 91.77 223.90 HATS 286563 0885616 358823 51312012 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 223.90 196.01 BIRTHDAY INSERTS 286703 31506 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP EDUCATION PROGRAMS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL (BILLING) PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PSTF ADMINISTRATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE VETERANS MEMORIAL ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 781.76 RICOH TONER 286661 315245 5110.6151 781.76 358825 51312012 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 485.65 COLOR RIBBON 00006488 286562 129729 5410.6513 485.65 368826 51312012 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 2,056.64 MAIL WATER BILLS 286602 62357 5910.6103 2,056.64 358827 51312012 102223 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR INC 223.90 HATS 286563 0885616 5440.5511 223.90 368828 51312012 123703 IMPRIMUS FORENSIC SERVICES LLC . 3,000.00 FINGERPRINT DEVELOPMENT COURSE 286657 691 7410.6218 3,000.00 t 358829 51312012 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 40.60 FOUNTAIN PARTS 00001028 286403 702453 1647.6530 40.60 358830 51312012 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 346.81 VETERAN MEMORIAL MANUALS 00007104 286444 91490 47073.6710 346.81 358831 51312012 130177 ISD #273 60.00 EDINA DIALOGUE EVENT 286503 PERMIT 42960 1122.6103 EQUIPMENT RENTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP EDUCATION PROGRAMS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL (BILLING) PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PSTF ADMINISTRATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE VETERANS MEMORIAL ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 12 511/2012 -5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 60.00 368832 61312012 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 12.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286740 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 12.21 368833 61312012 121075 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 79.19 TOILET SERVICE 286564 52306 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 79.19 286565 52305 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 158.38 358834 51312012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 2,596.95 286774 1759523 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,889.12 286775 1759532 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,148.50 286776 1759521 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 18.00 286777 1759522 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 23.20= 286778 1782902 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 9,629.37 358835 51312012 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 131.04 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001025 286404 60876951 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 249.96 LAWN CHEMICALS 00001200 286704 60930007 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 381.00 358837 51312012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR.CO. 4,433.91 286616 1282828 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 227.88 286617 1282827 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 431.44 286618 1282829 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 253.75 256779 1284329 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 108.50 286780 1274891 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,035.14 286781 1277776 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 168.33 286782 1282814 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 219.33 286783 1282817 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 31.37 286784 1284140 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,801.49 286785 1284139 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,325.34 286786 1284138 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,141.45 286787 1282825 5042.5513 COST- OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,063.55 286788 1282824 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 1,033.76 286789 1282812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,191.63 286790 1282822 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,488.06 286791 1282823 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 664.56 286792 1282815 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 13 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODSSOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5/112012 - 513/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,126.83 286793 1282826 5862.5513 3,269.67 286794 1282830 5862.5513 2,225.49 286795 1282813 5822.5513 1,684.73 286796 1282821 5822.5513 754.06 286797 1282816 5822.5513 2,831.50 286798 1284146 5842.5512 66.74 286799 1284147 5842.5515 25.98 286800 1284145 5842.5512 15,21- 286801 532188 5842.5513 27.69- 286802 525953 5842.5513 31,561.59 358838 51312012 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 4.78 PETTY CASH 286507 042412 5110.6107 9.76 PETTY CASH 286507 042412 5120.6406 22.39 PETTY CASH 286507 042412 5110.6564 40.00 PETTY CASH 286507 042412 5110.6105 68.92 PETTY CASH 286507 042412 5110.6406 149.85 PETTY CASH 286507 042412 5111.6406 295.70 368839 613/2012 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 53.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286750 042512 5919.6104 53.28 358840 61312012 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 DWI TOW C# 11- 000149 286508 042512 2340.6103 153.74 DWI TOW C# 11- 002413 286508 042512 2340.6103 180.56 DWI TOW C# 11- 001639 286508 042512 2340.6103 488.04 358841 61312012 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 602.94 PROLASER III REPAIRS 286405 461416 2340.6406 602.94 358842 51312012 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 408.46 DRILL BITS, WASHERS, NUTS 00005035 286705 9300780731 1553.6530 213.03 CABLE TIES, HI-TECH LURE 00001196 286706 9300770986 1301.6406 621.49 358843 61312012 113962 LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC. 27,246.25 RADIO FIELD CONTROLLERS 00001619 286840 93186059 421260.6710 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 13 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST.OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODSSOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING MILEAGE ORALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER - ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 14 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 643.65- CREDIT FOR RETURN 286841 CONF 60228657 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 26,602.60 358844 51312012 100868 LINHOFF PHOTO 49.98 PHOTO DEVELOPING 00003008 286406 125711 1400.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT.,GENERAL 49.98 368845 51312012 101792 LUBE -TECH 801.41 GAS 00006045 286566 2032685 5422.6581 GASOLINE - MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 992.52 DIESEL 00006046 286567 2032686 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 703.50 GAS 00006045 286568 2032684 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 2,497.43 368846 61312012 100443 LUCHT, PETE _ 53.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286747 042512 5919.6104 ... CONFERENCES& SCHOOLS TRAINING 53.28 358847 51312012 122472 M & I BANK 19.00 PSTF EXPENSES 286658 041612 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS - PSTF ADMINISTRATION 53.92 PSTF EXPENSES 286658 041612 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 129.70 PSTF EXPENSES 286658 041612 7413.6406 GENERAL- SUPPLIES:- PSTF FIRE TOWER 142.31 PSTF EXPENSES 286658 041612 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 143.49 PSTF EXPENSES 286658 041612 7410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PSTF ADMINISTRATION 148.04 PSTF EXPENSES 286658 041612 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 636.46 358848 51312012 118096 M -B COMPANIES INC 240.47- BEARINGS, SEALS, WASHERS 00005108 286445 164334 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 240.47 358849 51312012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 657.59 286803 130272 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS.SOLD MIX, 50TH ST SELLING 657.59 358850 5/312012 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 60.13 OXYGEN 00003649 286707 04547010 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 60.13 358851 51312012 101146 MATRIX 304.79 286446 607950550 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 304.79 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 15 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 358852 61312012 130163 MAUI WOWI 51.50 OVERAGE ON BEVERAGES 286646 HEALTH FAIR 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 'EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 51.50 358853 6/3/2012 100876 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 981.11 PLANTS 286708 54576 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 961.11 358854 51312012 101483 MENARDS 66.52 HARDWARE 00001030 286407 50631 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.95 HARDWARE 00001021 286408 48237 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.22 FILTERS 00001987 286409 44542 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 49.16 LIMESTONE 00001037 286526 51333 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.75 LUMBER, HINGES 00001952 286709 40952 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19.67 TACK CLOTHS; STAIN 00001098 286710 47783 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15.49 PAINT, THINNER 00001114 286711 49769 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4.18, ADAPTOR; PLUG 00001197 286712 50269 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 318.94 368855 51312012 102281 MENARDS F, 104.65 CEDAR 00009959 286713 36549 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 104.65 358856 51312012 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 392.02 HAND SOAP 00001134 286527 SOI -001227 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 392.02 368867 51312012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,800.00 SEWER REPAIR 00001042 286410 34060 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 2,800.00 358858 51312012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,300.00 SEWER REPAIR 00001043 286411 34059 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 2,300.00 358859 51312012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS:& SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,205.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001170 286412 34061 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,205.00 358860 51312012 102089 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMER 500.00 CALIBRATE WHEEL -LOAD 286413 001 - 00001725 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 500.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 16 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No ' Account No Subledger,Account Description Business Unit 358861 61312012 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 DAVID GOERGEN 266745 RECERTIFICATION 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 BARTON VOTH 286745 RECERTIFICATION 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 46.00 358862 61312012 103167 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP 1,402.70 CRS2 00005153 286736 00000070453 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,402.70 358863 51312012 129622 MINNESOTA OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GR 9.75 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1640.6466 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 23.29 PRINTER SUPPLIES 266603 005691 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.16 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 27.74 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 57.87 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 61.21 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 62.35 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 86.28 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, ARENA ADMINISTRATION 93.57 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 97.21 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 103.39 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 126.71 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 211.91 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 5761.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 211.82 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL, 212.12 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 233.00 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 280.58 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 326.79 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 360.40 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 516.71 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 810.84 PRINTER SUPPLIES 286603 005691 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 18.15 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 29.79 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.87 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 39.80 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 44.81 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 46.55 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 -007228 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 63.92 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 .1490.6406 GENERAU SUPPLIES - PUBLIC HEALTH 66.67 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN: GENERAL 74.96 ' PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 89.55 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 .007228 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 8,126.10 5422.6530 CITY OF EDINA 358864 51312012 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 100330 MINNESOTA, STATE FIRE MARSHAL Council Check Register 420.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 286714 041912 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 95.01 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1120.6406 119.06 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1190.6406 121.22 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 5510.6406 212.50 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1160.6406 233.89 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 5761.6406 235.30 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1470.6406 243.11 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 5861.6406 431.99 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 5720.6406 539.25 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1260.6406 651.49 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1400.6406 776.41 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 286604 007228 1495.6406 1470.6104 1642.6530 1643.6530 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES` GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL. SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 17 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ASSESSING ARENA ADMINISTRATION FINANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 5422.6530 8,126.10 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 358864 51312012 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 100330 MINNESOTA, STATE FIRE MARSHAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 5422.6530 420.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 286714 041912 420.00 358865 51312012 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 27.64 SPRAYER PARTS 00001015 286414 0093354 -IN 408.67 SPRAYER PARTS 00001020 286528 0093638 -IN 436.31 368866 61312012 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS &SERVICE GROUP 119.74 CAPS, TANK °ASSEMBLY 00005110 286715 503035F6W 119.74 358867 , 51312012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. _ 1,105.21 BOOM VALVES 00006179 286569 833967 -00 121.73 NOZZLES 286570 834002 -00 307.00 SPRAYER REPAIR 00006478 286571 834380 -00 199.59 END CAPS 00006181 286572 834521 -00 21.37 O -RINGS 00006186 286573 836582 -00 1,754.90 358868 51312012 100916 MUZAK LLC 2,226.92 INSTALL NEW SPEAKER SYSTEM 00007528 286470 ACCT354332 2,226.92 358869 61312012 103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER 26,527.61 2013 FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR 00003169 286471 F3748 26,527.61 1470.6104 1642.6530 1643.6530 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES` GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL. SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 17 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ASSESSING ARENA ADMINISTRATION FINANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5800.1720 BUILDINGS 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIELD MAINTENANCE GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET POLICE EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 18 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 358870 51312012 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 555.50 286619 73162 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING_ 555.50 358871 51312012 130183 NEWELL, SUZANNE 475.00 REFUND - MAY 18TH RENTAL 286645 042512 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 475.00 358872 51312012 101967 NIOA 80.00 MEMBERSHIP - MOLLY ANDERSON 286472 2012 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 " 358873 51312012 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 42.99 CANVAS PANELS, PAINT 00009143 286662 42179400 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 42.99 358874 51312012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 25.49 LABELING TAPE 286574 1460194378 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 16.56 TAPE, CRATE 286575 1460787551 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 16.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 286663 1458335953 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 58.59 358875 51312012 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 185.00 INSTALL NEW PLEXIGLASS 286716 2252 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,125.00 ADVENTURE PEAK REPAIRS 286717 2269 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,367.90 ADVENTURE PEAK MAINTENANCE 286718 2268 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4,677.90 368876 51312012 129485 PAPCO INC. 163.58 HAND TOWELS, SOAP 286659 71046 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 163.58 368877 6/312012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,495.02 286620 8347090 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - YORK SELLING 913.40 286621 8347105 -IN 5822:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,038.90 286622 8347112 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33.25 286623 8347119 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX ' VERNON SELLING 8,480.57 358878 51312012 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 69.04 286804 71093330 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 410.10 286805 73227514 5862.5515 COST OF. GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # -Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 1642.6544 5101.4607 1553.6583 5919.6104 1553.6530 1554.6230 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 479.14 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 358879 51312012 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 834.03 YORK SELLING 286485 2227490 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,270.03 YORK SELLING 286624 2231026 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 658.04 50TH ST SELLING 286625 2231018 637.92 286626 2231025 203.41 286627 2231024 580.74 286806 2231019 43.07 286807 2231021 57.12 286808 2231023 1,374.39 286809 2231022 1,085.71 286810 2231020 969.85 286811 2231017 86.99 286812 2231014 2,261.63 286813 2231016 45.22 286814 2231015 34.92 - 286815 3481072 10,073.23 358880 513.12012 130174 PIONEER ATHLETICS 1,322.50 C18653 FIELD LINE PAINT 00001029 286415 INV439370 1,322.50 368881 5/312012 130179 PITZ, MARJORIE 14.00 CLASS REFUND 286509 042412 14.00 368882 61312012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 503.68 TIRES 00005127 286719 277182 503.68 358883 51312012 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 12.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286741 042512 12.21 358884 51312012 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC 242.50 RUBRAIL, ENDCAPS 00005148 286473 2947 242.50 358885 6/312012 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 8,163.54 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 286605 SA238 5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 1642.6544 5101.4607 1553.6583 5919.6104 1553.6530 1554.6230 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING LINE MARKING POWDER CLASS REGISTRATION TIRES & TUBES FIELD MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/1/2012 — 5/3/2012 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 20 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 731.03 ID /A.C. CARD ORDER 286606 59234 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,894.57 358886 51312012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 809.58 CUPS, LIDS, UTENSILS - 286720 5573 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 3,088.30 PLATES, NAPKINS, CUTLERY 00005602 286721 5602 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,162.10 LINERS, TOWELS, CLEANERS 286722 5600 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 6,059.98 358887 51312012 100466 R &.R PRODUCTS INC. 314.32 BLADES, SCREWS, BEARINGS 00006184 286576 CD1546911 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 314.32 368888 61312012 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 1,106.09 EMULSION 00001106 286723 3329 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,106.09 358889 51312012 118882 RHOMAR INDUSTRIES INC. 304.66 STRIPING PAINT 00001985 286416 72623 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 304.66 358890 51312012 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 1,053.71 REPAIR WATER LINE 286577 59245 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE-& GROUNDS 1,053.71 358891 51312012 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED . 21.79 SPRING HANGER KIT 00005038 286724 1355980-01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.79 368892 5/312012 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH 425.00, CLASS REIMBURSEMENT 286474 042412 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 425.00 358893 51312012 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. 27.50 286628 17440 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 27.50 358894 51312012 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 174.44 SOFTENER SALT 00001112 286725 00266921 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 174.44 368895 51312012 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 29,493.23 BLACKTOP ROLLER 29,493.23 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/1/2012 — 5/3/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00005991 286664 M01747 421305.6710 358896 51312012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 110.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 286510 999999 -2012 110.00 358897 51312012 103124 SAVE A LIFE 61.94 _RESCUE DISC 286726 6065 61.94 358898 51312012 100995 SEH 134.58 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 134.58 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 284.10 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 314.01 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 445:54 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 628.03 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 668.30 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 737.20 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 .254792 779.69- GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 1,336.60 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 1,447.98 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 1,503.69 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 1,642.30 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 2,017.54 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 2,227.68 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 4,477.05 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 286417 254792 6,233.54 GALLAGHER DR ST RECON 286418 254854 1,213.49 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 286419 255519 1,288.45 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 286419 255519 2,594.48 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 286419 255519 2,647.19 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 286419 255519 3,890.68 RICHMOND HILLS PK IMPROV 286420 255520 4,577.27 RICHMOND HILLS PK IMPROV 286420 255520 5,721.58 RICHMOND HILLS PK IMPROV 286420 255520 8,696.80 RICHMOND HILLS PK IMPROV 286420 255520 55,642.35 358899 51312012 120784 SIGN PRO` 47.20 MAKE CHANGES ON SIGNS 286475 5.510 66.90 MAKE CHANGES ON SIGNS - 286475 5510 1624.6406 1470.6406 01402.1705.20 01400.1705.20 01403.1705.20 01401.1705.20 01388.1705.20 01386.1705.20 07047.1705.20 07108.1705.20 07046.1705.20 1260.6103 1260.6103 46001.6710 01387.1705.20 48017.1705.20 05499.1705.21 01385.1705.20 01382.1705.20 03460.1705.21 04375.1705.21 05511.1705.21 01334.1705.21 03471.1705.21 05525.1705.20 04387.1705.20 01388.1705.20 5862.6406 5822.6406 Subledger Account Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN . CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN. CONSULTING DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 21 Business Unit STREET EQUIPMENT PLAYGROUND & THEATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLAR CIRCLE GLACIER PLACE VERNON CT & VERNON HILLS GLEASON COURT WESTCHESTER KNOLLS NEIGHBORHOO VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD W 42ND ST SIDEWALK S108 SCHOOL ROAD XERXES AVE SIDEWALK ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL FIBER OPTIC CABLING VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD SA17 SOUNDWALL TH 100 WM -499 RAW WATER WELL2 TO WTP6 COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK WESTCHESTER KNOLLS NEIGHBORHOO VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 412.20 MAKE CHANGES ON SIGNS 286475 " 5510 5842.6406 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 1281.6104 CONFERENCES.& SCHOOLS 526.30 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 358900 61312012 23.54 105739 SNAZA, DAVID 873184124 -113 7411.6188 30.58 286476 212.67 TRAINING EXPENSES 286739 042512 873184124 -113 5841.6188 515.90 TRAINING EXPENSES 286739 042512 56.54 286476 728.57 4090.6188 358901 51312012 123905 SNIPERCRAFT INC. 595.00 TRAINING 286529 042412 595.00 358902 5/312012 102935, SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 972.51 ICE MAKER REPAIR 00006340 286578 27671 972.51 358903 61312012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 230.93 286486 1780819 3,925.16 286487 1760028 748.50 286488 1771840 4,632.50 286489 1771843 931.26 286629 1780017 313.00 286630 1749142 64.50 286631 1780029 2,520.42 286632 1780027 5,249.02' 286633 1780820 1,609.00 286816 1780026 406.40 286817 1760818 20,630.69 358904 51312012 105193 SPAIN, MARK 725.00 STUMP AND TREE TRIMMING 286579 042112 725.00 358905 51312012 104672 SPRINT Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 1281.6104 CONFERENCES.& SCHOOLS 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5421.6180 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5642.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5422.6180 15.62 286476 873184124 -113 1240.6188 17.32 286476 873184124 -113 1180.6103 23.54 286476 873184124 -113 7411.6188 30.58 286476 873184124 -113 1554.6230 51.74 286476 873184124 -113 5841.6188 52.96 286476 873184124 -113 1490.6188 56.54 286476 873184124 -113 4090.6188 5/1/2072 10:19:46 Page - 22 Business Unit YORK SELLING- TRAINING TRAINING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS - GRILL COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON.SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 23 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 56.65 286476 873164124.113 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 58.55 286476 873184124 -113 1190.6186 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 73.99 286476 873184124 -113 1470.6166 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 66.66 286476 873184124 -113 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104.28 286476 873184124 -113 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 105.31 286476 873184124 -113 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 112.27 286476 873184124 -113 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 120.43 286476 873184124 -113 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 133.65 286476 873184124 -113 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 165.67 286476 873184124 -113 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 171.60 286476 873184124 -113 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 245.96 286476 873184124 -113 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 373.24 286476 873184124 -113 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 690.50 286476 873184124 -113 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,800.69 286476 873184124 -113 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,549.75 358906 51312012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 75.69 FOUNTAIN REPAIR PARTS 00001121 286530 S2537175.001 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 42.16 FOUNTAIN PARTS 00001133 286531 S2537147.001 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 94.31 HVAC PARTS 00001087 286727 S2530339.001 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.89 HVAC PARTS 00001087 286728 S2530339.002 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 42.96 HVAC PARTS 00001095 286729 S2531751.001 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.54 HVAC PARTS 00001099 286730 S2532306.001 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300.55 358907 51312012 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 200.90 GOLF TEES 286580 0000672005 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 200.90 368908 61312012 103263 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 2,409.45 TRASH BARREL DOME TOPS 00001006 286421 17221 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 2,409.45 358909 51312012 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 198.79 PUMP HANDLES 00001161 286422 28079 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 198.79 358910 61312012 101015 STREICHERS 25.59 FOAM PAD FOR GUN RACKS 286423 1922173 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 25.59 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 511/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 24 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 358911 51312012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 63.59 MATS 00005994 286731 390538 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 590.94 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005151 286732 609112 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 654.53 368912 51312012 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 5,634.97 FUNGICIDES 00006117 286581 7706 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5,634.97 358913 51312012 110074 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 13.35 HOLSTERICLIP 286424 32311 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 13.35 358914 51312012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,313.00 286490 001170 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 839.00 286818 001196 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 686.00 286819 001292 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,838.00 358915 51312012 101027 TARGET BANK 158.22 SUPPLIES 286582 041812 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 158.22 358916 613/2012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 121.03 PUTTER 286583 17615826 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 79.20 DEMO MERCHANDISE 286584 17604442 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 200.23 358917 6/312012 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 151.03 T- MARKERS 00006169 286585 S155914 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 22.78 BRACKETS 286586 S155902 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 125.66 BASES 286587 S155893 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,045.59 WETTING AGENT 286588 S1558541N 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,345.06 358918 61312012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 153.30 286589 685890 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 140.00 286590 685891 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 150.60 286591 686215 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 116.05 286820 686805 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 109.50 286821 687143 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 305.00 286822 00772817 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 25 5/1/2012 - 5/312012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,302.85 286823 00740619 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,277.30 358919 51312012 123582 TSCHOSICK, RON 92.03 DRAIN TILE BASIN 286607 042512 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 92.03 368920 61312012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 561.34 TINES 00006183 286592 J159753 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 133.60 TINES 00006183 286593 J159753A 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 694.94 358921 51312012 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 80.16 STRAW BLANKET 00001013 286425 27232 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 617.20 GRASS SEED 00001035 286426 27326 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 697.36 358922 61312012 101051. UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 333.62 RESERVE UNIFORMS 286511 116700 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 333.62 358923 61312012 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 123.38 HEATER ELEMENT 00001234 286427 715715 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 123.38 358924 51312012 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 75.95 SHIPPING CHARGES -- 286679 TRAN:8762 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE_ DEPT. GENERAL 75.95 368925 51312012 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.95 286428 2727714403 5952.6188 TELEPHONE RECYCLING 39.91 286428 2727714403 1130.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 67.72 286428 2727714403 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 102.84 286428 2727714403 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 288.36 286428 2727714403 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 531.78 358926 51312012 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 277.44 CLUTCH 00006178 286594 60125 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 277.44 358927 61312012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY R55CKREG LOG20000 750.00 CITY OF EDINA 358931 51312012 Council Check Register 101069 VOSS.LIGHTING 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 23.35 BUSHINGS 00001093 286429 6292804 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5912.6406 352.37 UNIVOLTS 00001093 286429 6292804 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 286431 375.72 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 358928 51312012 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 358932 783.20 NITRILE GLOVES, EAR PLUGS 00001889 286430 294560 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 783.20 53.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 358929 51312012 042512 119454 VINOCOPUI CONFERENCES -& SCHOOLS 5/112012 10:19:46 Page - 26 . Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 253.00 286824 0055758 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253.00 358930 51312012 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 750.00 U OF M.LEADERSHIP.000RSE 286738 042512 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL WELL HOUSES CITY HALL GENERAL TRAINING P21 50TH &FRANCE CENTER RAMP P22 50TH &FRANCE SOUTH RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP SENIOR CITIZENS 750.00 358931 51312012 101069 VOSS.LIGHTING 52.97 LIGHTING 00001199 286431 15202987 -00 '1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 188.95 LIGHTING 00001199 286431 15202987 -00 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 274.98 LIGHTING 00001199 286431 15202987 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 516.90 358932 61312012 101932 VOTH, BART 53.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286749 042512 5919.6104 CONFERENCES -& SCHOOLS 53.28 358933 5/312012 102642 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC 25,772.17 FEASIBILITY STUDY 286432 21380800003 44008.1705.20 CONSULTING'DESIGN 25,772.18 FEASIBILITY STUDY 286432 21380800003 44009.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 51,544.35 358934 51312012 120009 WALL ENTERPRISES INC. 25620 CERAMIC WHEELS 00001031 286433 L -419 -7 1646.6556 TOOLS 256.20 358935 61312012 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 171.68 GARDEN ART SHOW POSTCARD 286665 49063 5120.6575 PRINTING 171.68 368936 613/2012 105440 WEIGLE, SUE 186.34 PETTY CASH 286608 042412 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 186.34 STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL WELL HOUSES CITY HALL GENERAL TRAINING P21 50TH &FRANCE CENTER RAMP P22 50TH &FRANCE SOUTH RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/112012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 27 511/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 358937 51312012 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 305.00 REPAIR REEL 00005154 286733 44303 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 543.00 REPAIR LIFT 00005154 286734 44308 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 848.00 358938 513/2012 116768 WET PAINT INC. 44.05 MASA, INK 286666 702539 -01 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 44.05 358939 51312012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,158.15 286634 297768 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 707.55 286635 297928 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,082.40 286636 297929 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,948.10 358940 51312012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1.12 286637 406554 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,599.68 286638 406556 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 201.12 286825 406761 5842,5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,674.05 286826 406555 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .56 286827 406553 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 325.04 286828 406552 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,801.57 358941 51312012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,901.45 285491 735518 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,509.06 286492 735520 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26.53- 286493 858331 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5.42- 286494 858346 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 34.53 286639 735524 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,649.92 286640 735525 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,770.20 286641 735523 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,510.56 286642 735522 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 66.41 286643 735519 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,560.29 286829 737361 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92.94- 286830 858691 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 105.10- 286831 858595 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 23,772.43 358942 51312012 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 1,143.72 286495 888282 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING F) R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 51112012 10:19:46 Council Check Register Page - 28 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,463.35 286496 889366 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 48.00 286497 889367 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,816.90 286498 888812 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 341.50 286644 888270 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 168.40 286832 891238 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 223.45 286833 891239 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,167.10 286834 891451 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 24.00 286835 891231 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,963.35 286836 891230 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,359.77 358944 5/312012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 10.17 51- 6050184 -2 286532 322645093 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 932.58 51- 9011854 -4 286533 322688064 5913.6185 LIGHT &POWER DISTRIBUTION 956.99 51- 5107681 -4 286534 322621220 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 38.09 51- 6892224 -5 286535 322660483 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 65.60 51- 6692497 -0 286536 322657669 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 27.34 51- 0160483 -1 286537 322547639 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 92.35 51- 9770164 -7 286538 322698795 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 41.82 51- 0223133 -2 286539 322548326 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 9,066.26 51- 6644819 -9 286540 322653399 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 98.60 51- 8526048 -8 286541 322679745 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 44.39 51- 8997917 -7 286542 322690416 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 7,644.54 51- 9603061 -0 286543 322696350 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 20.01 51- 9770163 -6 286544 322700827 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 38.15 51- 0194596 -8 286545 322547951 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 258.33 51- 6223269 -1 286546 322645458 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 59.95 51- 4420190 -3 286547 322607129 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 10.17 51- 6541084 -2 286548 322651987 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 398.28 51- 8324712 -5 286549 322679736 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 178.80 51- 9337452 -8 286667 322856128 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 198.74 51- 8987646 -8 286668 322848409 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 60.40 51- 8976004 -9 286669 322853382 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 44.15 51- 9422326 -6 286670 322859067 1322.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 15.32 51- 0193479 -4 286671 322715083 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION'MAINT 94.47 51- 9608462 -5 286672 322861190 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 32,565.32 51- 4621797 -2 286753 322968189 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 52,960.82 358945 51312012 130178 ZARRIN, SARAH 281.96 EDINA DIALOGUE EVENT 286504 FOOD 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 1 29 Business Unit POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 5/1/2012 — 5/3/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account, Description 281.96 358946 51312012 129406 ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC 415.00 RHINO LINER 286434 92501 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 415.00 RHINO LINER 286435 92502 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .830.00 358947 51312012 101091 27EGLER INC 511.91 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005037 286735 SW060052795 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 511.91 1,008,529.65 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,008,529.65 Total Payments 1,008,529.65 5/1/2012 10:19:46 Page - 1 29 Business Unit POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 5/1/2012 - 5/3/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 140,327.44 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,077.45 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 98,439.01 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 84,518.44 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,647.19 05100 ART CENTER FUND _ 2,819.71 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 4,137.93 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 23,405.13 05500 P,. ICE ARENA FUND 207.50 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 27,578.80 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,947.62 05800 LIQUOR FUND 161,163.28 05900 UTILITY FUND 437,859.26 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 7,060.45 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.95 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 8,829.52 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,477.97 Report Totals 1,008,529.65 511/2012 10:20:34 Page- 1 We confirm to the best of-our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply,inrall material respects, with the requirements of`the City of Edina purchasing polici s d procedure e. 3 Finane•o ., +,.. CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 1 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 358948 511012012 118536 A& B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 213.75 ALTERNATOR 00005245 287238 61649 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 213.75 358949 5/1012012 100613 AAA 3.25 BAL DUE ON TABS 286884 043012 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS _EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.25 358950 5110/2012 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 19.92 PLUMBING PARTS 00001129 287136 1- 839521 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.92 358951 511012012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 847.47 UB TEMP 286846 35364250 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 839.48 UB TEMP 287239 35411585 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 1,686.95 358952 511012012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 94.80 287185 1566076 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 94.80 358953 5/1012012 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 152.43 QUARTERLY PEST CONTROL 286934 1061100- APR2012 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 152.43 358954 5/1012012 130194 ADVENTURE ZONE 567.76 FORCE ON FORCE TRAINING 286983 050212 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 567.76 358955 511012012 130189 AIU, RENE 99.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 286847 6415 INDIAN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET POND CIR 99.00 358956 5110/2012 105991' AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 101.91 COFFEE MACHINE FILTER KIT 286982 116554 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 101.91 368957 5/1012012 102715 ALLEGRA EDINA 78.72 EVENT CALENDAR 287070 92914 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 78.72 R55CKREG LOG20000 286848 CITY OF EDINA 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 91.62 286848 Council Check Register 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 127.80 286848 5/10/2012 -5/1012012 5861.6201 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 358958 5/10/2012 213.90 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 043012 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39,958.20 . RECYCLING 287298 2858207 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 39,958.20 511012012 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 358959 5/1012012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 130.05 SPRINKLER HEADS 00001220 286886 46611 117.65 AIR DRYER CARTRIDGES 00005158 286885 AFS- 221180007 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 117.65 5/10/2012 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 358960 511012012 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 105,307.50 FLOW RIDER CONSTRUCTION 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page - 2 Business Unit RECYCLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.84 286848 043012 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 91.62 286848 043012 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 127.80 286848 043012 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 202.58 286848 043012 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 213.90 286848 043012 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 7AQ 7a 286848 043012 1551 6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 286848 043012 358961 5/10/2012 100595 ANOKA COUNTY 250.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 286916 050212 250.00 358962 5/1012012 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 618.45 FOOD 287071. 1729042 618.45 358963 511012012 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 130.05 SPRINKLER HEADS 00001220 286886 46611 130.05 358964 5/10/2012 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. - 105,307.50 FLOW RIDER CONSTRUCTION 286984 APPL 3 105,307.50 358965 5/1012012 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 110.63 COFFEE 286935 1017068 110.63 358966 5/1012012 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 286936 050112 33.28 286936 050112 44.71 286936 050112 1470.6201 1000.2055 5730.5510 1318.6406 5300.1715 5430.5510 5821.6182 1481.6162 5111.6182 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET - COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES LAND IMPROVEMENTS. COST OF GOODS SOLD RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 5/1012012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Dater Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 56.55 286936 050112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 66.29 286936 050112 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.66 286936 050112 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 73.92 266936 050112 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 90.08 286936 050112 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 99.35 286936 050112 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY ' 198.28 286936 050112 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 207.79 286936 050112 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 211.25 286936 050112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL - 249.25 286936 050112 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 285.91 286936 050112 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 285.92 286936 050112 1552:6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 309.03 286936 050112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 399.03 286936 050112 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 646.03 286936 . 050112 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 212.82 287137 MAY2012 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 3,571.15 358967 511012012 120996 AVR INC. 2,415.38. READY MIX 00001838 286887 60453 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 2,534.54 286888 60496 5913.6520 CONCRETE- DISTRIBUTION 739.04 286889 60580 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 478.14 286890 60540 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 777.53 286891 60624 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 585.14 286892 60984 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 7,529.77 358968. 511012012 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 255.65 BATTERIES FOR TASER 286917 018- 266564 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 78.21 BATTERIES 286985 018 - 266733 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 333.86 358969 5/1012012 125300 BAUMANi DOUG 96.29 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286850 043012 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 96.29 ' 358970 6110/2012 102346 BEARCOM' 30.14 WALKIE/TALKIE RENTAL 286849 ORDER#31893843 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 30.14 _ 358971 511012012. 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 48.00 286878 86677000 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 4 5/1012012 - 5/1012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 129.59 286878 86677000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20.50 286879 73298800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 59.55 286950 73298600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 533.93 286951 6170000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 433.25 286952 6171600 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 199.55 286953 73189400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH.ST SELLING 29.92 287007 73339600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,454.29 358972 5/1012012 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,133.41 LAWN MAINTENANCE 287138 139127 .7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,133.41 358973 511012012 101191 BENNEROTTE; JENNIFER 10.00 REIMBURSEMENT 286851 042612 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 32.39 REIMBURSEMENT 286851 042612 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 40.00 REIMBURSEMENT 286851 042612 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 82.39 358974 511012012 105833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 200.00 DELIVER DISCHARGE HEAD 00001184 287072 13514 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES 200.00 358975 5/1012012 130069 _ BFG SUPPLY COMPANY 226.43 GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES 00001119 287139 1290721 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE. . ' 226.43 358976 511012012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 183.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003782 287240 76859 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 183.93 358977 5/1012012 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 204.50 287008 107783 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 284.50 287186 107784 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 489.00 358978 5/10/2012 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 23.14 WATER VALVE 00005157 286894 627737X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.55 INDICATOR 00005099 287073 619936X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.69 358979 5/1012012 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC R55CKREG LOG20000 286954 CITY OF EDINA 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 31.10 Council Check Register 86549 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,152.45 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 287009 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 287010 86552 1,059.50 MATERIALS TESTING 00007110 287074 350276 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS 287187 1,059.50 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 358980 5/1012012 104481 BREDE EXPOSITION SERVICES 358985 511012012 1,846.80 SHOW CURTAIN 287241 982333 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,846.80 952 929 -0297 286853 0297 -4/12 358981 5/10/2012 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 113680_ BRONZE MEMORIAL CO. 952 927 -8861 286854 8861 -4/12 1550.6188 287.98 BRONZE PLAQUE 00007101 286852 527087 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 286855 0024-4/12 287.98 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 40.36 358982 511012012 9246 -4/12 101430 BROWNELLS INC. TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page - 5 Business Unit AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 158 48 GUN REPAIR TOOLS 06003006 286918 07516804.00 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 158.48 358983 5/1012012 1001"44 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 885.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 287299 050712 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 885.00 358984 5/10/2012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 842.25 286954 86550 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 31.10 286955 86549 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,152.45 287009 86551 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 47.85 287010 86552 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 635.80 287187 88263 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,709.45 358985 511012012 123898 CENTURYLINK 55.86 952 929 -0297 286853 0297 -4/12 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 330.05 952 927 -8861 286854 8861 -4/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 121.41 952 831 -0024 286855 0024-4/12 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 40.36 952 922 -9246 286986 9246 -4/12 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 111.15 952 920 -8632 287075 8632 -4112. 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 658.83 358986 5/1012012 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 9,966.09 SCRUBBER 287242 517026 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 9,966.09 358987 5/10/2012 129973 CHEROKEE PRODUCTIONS INC. 295.00 SEMINAR - KAYLIN MARTIN 286987 2012 -02 -08 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 295.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 6 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 358988 5110/2012 130190 CITY OF BLAINE 506.58 TABLE TOP VOTING BOOTHS 286893 042512 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 506.58 358989 511012012 122064 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 20.54 001140640203163012 286856 203163012 -4/12 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 20.54 358990 5/10/2012 105693 CITYSPRINT 20.79 SHIPPING CHARGE 286988 25787 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 20.79 358991 5/1012012 114548 CIZEK, DARIN 150.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 286919 043012 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.99 358992 511012012 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 31.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT . 287300 042312 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 31.08 358993 511012012 120433 COMCAST 82.46 8772 10 614 0165667 286937 165667 -4/12 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 90.44 8772 10 614 0164959 287243 0164959 -4/12 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 96.12 8772 10 614 0177449 287244 177449 -4/12 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 269.02 358994 511012012 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 121.41 MEADOW PATCH, SLEDGE HAMMER0001210 286895 00774841N 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 121.41 358995 511012012 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 5,000.00 GRANDVIEW SMALL AREA PLAN 287140 37687 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES S,U00.00 358996 511012012 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 50.21 MERCHANDISE 287245 92060449 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 50.21 358997 511012012 104020 DALCO 57.71 SPONGES 00001454 287076 2455580 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES„ CENT SVC PW BUILDING 57.71 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 5/10/2012 -5/1012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO ,# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 358998 6/1012012 130186 DAVID WAYNE CONSTRUCTION 450.36 PERMIT REFUND 286857 ED111884 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 450.36 358999 511012012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,940.90 286956 648937 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 67.20 286957 648938 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,165.00 266958 648934 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 21.50 286959 648935 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,194.60 359000 5110/2012 101657 DEHN, BRUCE 150.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 286896 043012 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 150.96 ' 359001 6110/2012 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 96.99 BAKERY 286938 409309 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 59.70 286939 409694. 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 38.78 287246 409985 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 195.47 359002 5/1012012 130191 DEPADUA, LIZBETH 534.01 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 286933 7740 MARTH CT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 534.01 359003 5/1012012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 130.98 651972955 287077 651972955 -4/12 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ' 91.62 650243624 287141 650243624-4/12 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 222.60 359004 511012012 - 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 27,578.84 SOUTHDALE DEVELOPMENT .287301 1795517 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 27,578.84 369005 5/10/2012 104192 DYNAMIC BRANDS 18.45 CART PARTS 286940 773433 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 18.45 359006 511012012 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 42.72 MERCHANDISE 287247 477335 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 42.72 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 8 5/10/2012 — 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 359007 5/10/2012 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 38.31 HERITAGE AWARD PLAQUE 287142 86401 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 38.31 359008 5/1012012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 APR GMM 287248 31769 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 50.00 APR GMM 287248 31769 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 75.00 359009 5/1012012 105417 EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 10,000.00 ANNUAL SUPPORT 286941 042912 1516.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HISTORICAL SOCIETY 10,000.00 - 359010 5/1012012 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 187.50 00006338 287249 146 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 270.60 00006338 287249 146 5421.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GRILL 458.10 359011 5110/2012 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 118.88 TARGET FIELD BUS APR 22 287143 12 -043 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 118.88 359012 5/1012012 103694 EDINALARM INC. 335.05 ALARM MONITORING 287250 72972 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 335.05 287251 72975 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 670.10 359013 5/1012012 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2,694.36 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003727 287252 1458105 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,694.36 359014 511012012 122460 ESGR 300.00 BANQUET 286989 MAY21 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT.. GENERAL 300.00 359015 511012012 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,746.00 APRIL BILLINGS 286990 050212 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,746.00 359016 5/10/2012 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 3,454.41 EXPLORER CONFERENCE 286991 JULY 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF.EDINA Council Check Register 5/1012012 — 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4,019.00 EXPLORER CONFERENCE 286991 JULY 1419.61 D4 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 7,473.41 359017 5/10/2012 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page - 9 Business Unit - RESERVE PROGRAM VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANTINGS & TREES COMMUNICATIONS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION TENNIS INSTRUCTION TREES & MAINTENANCE 234.50 287188 W- 539104 5862.5515 234.50 359018 511012012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY " 573.96 BRAKE PADS,.ROTORS 00005237 286898 69- 064909 1553.6530 21.07 PULLEY BELT 00005965 286899 1- 3861715 1553.6530 471.15- CREDIT 286992 1- 3854516 1553.6530 65.54 FILTERS 00005237 287078 69- 065073 1553.6530 189.42 359019 5/1012012 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 43.91 PAPER 00006493 286942 062200026176 5410.6575 43.91 359020 511012012 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,478.74 CS PARTS 00001162 287079 S01358555.001 5913.6406 1,782.03 2" COMPOUND METER 00001185 287080 S01359149.001 5917.6530 3,260.77 359021 5110/2012 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 202.70 LOCK REPAIR 287253 287418 5410.6230 202.70 359022, 511012012 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA. 65.49 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 287144 050212 1260.6107 65.49 359023 5/1012012 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 46.71 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 287302 050312 1130.6107 46.71 359024 511012012 100776 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 382.50 SOFTBALL SHIRTS 286858 83330 4077.6406 1,700.00 TENNIS SHIRTS 286859 83329 1623.6406 2,082.50 359025 511012012 103185 GERTENS 1,077.30 TREES 00001125 287303 248951 1644.6541 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page - 9 Business Unit - RESERVE PROGRAM VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANTINGS & TREES COMMUNICATIONS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION TENNIS INSTRUCTION TREES & MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 10 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 440.97 PLANTINGS FOR ARBOR DAY 00001126 287304 247519 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,518.27 359026 5/1012012 129797 GM CONTRACTING INC. 600.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 286897 043012 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER : UTILITY REVENUES 600.00 359027 5/10/2012 102540 GOERGEN, DAVID 11.34 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286860 042312 1280.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 11.34 359028 5/1012012 102385 GOLF MINNESOTA 675.00 DIRECTORY AD 286943 01217.2 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 675.00 359029 5/1012012 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,484.85 APRIL TICKETS 00001807 287081 37927 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,484.85 359030 5/1012012 101103 GRAINGER 21.17 EXT CORDS, BATTERIES, GLOVES 00001203 286900 9809666382 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 237.75 EXT CORDS, BATTERIES, GLOVES 00001203 286900 9809666382 1322.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 272.79 HYDRANT SPRAY PAINT 00001163 287082 9807479481 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 40.80 ANTI -SKID TAPE 00001203 287083 9809394803 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 40.81 ANTI -SKID TAPE 00001203 287083 9809394603 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 79.13 COUPLINGS 287084 9809666390 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 50.06 BALL VALVE 287085 9809666408 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 306.43 HAND SANITIZER, EAR PLUGS 00001171 287086 9810505546 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 126.72 TOILET REPAIR KIT, BATTERIES 00002128 287087 9812295112 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ` EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 163.14 EAR MUFFS 00001171 287088 9811686006 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 82.15 BATTERIES, KNEELING PADS 00005155 287089 9814205267 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,140.78 FOUNTAIN PUMP 00002103 287145 9807479556 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,561.73 359031 511012012 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 159.00 287011 X00028420 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 159.00 359032 5/1012012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,713.25 287012 139196 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 101.75 287013 138997 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,815.00 R55CKREG LOG 20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 359033 511012012 130196 GREEN, BRANDON 105.00 GOLF DOME CARD REFUND 287305 050412 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page- 11 Business Unit . GOLF DOME REVENUES 5410.6406 105.00 GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 359034 5110/2012 REPAIR PARTS 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6406 170.13 GOLF TEES 5915.6406 287254 46552 5915.6586 170.13 WATER TREATMENT 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. GENERAL STORM SEWER 359035 511012012 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 418.63 MOWER PARTS 00001008 287146 106703 COLLECTION SYSTEMS 418.63 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 359036 511012012 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 52.37 PINTLE HITCH 00005164 287255 3- 105991 52.37 359037 511012012 100790 HACH COMPANY 302.46 COLORIMETER 00001561 287090 7653218 515.06 REAGENTS, CHLORINE 00001204 287091 7717655 67.57 PH TESTER 00001204 287092 7721501 885.09 359038 6110/2012 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,659.20 CHEMICALS 00001841 287093 3330241 4,659.20 359039 5/10/2012 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 750.16- CREDIT 287094 4238546 448.68 PIPE, END SECTIONS 00001403 287095 4232481 29.99 COUPLINGS 00001861 287096 4567784 27.79 COUPLINGS 00001868 287097 4568711 524.73 PVC PIPE 00001175 287098 4719264 281.03 359040 5/1012012 124805 HEALTHSOURCE SOLUTIONS 2,098.50 HEALTH FAIR SCREENINGS 287147 20101046 2,098.50 359041 611012012 127379 HEARTLAND SERVICES INC. 614.78 CF -19 REPAIR 00004327 287099 HS10289095 614.78 1 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page- 11 Business Unit . GOLF DOME REVENUES 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. GENERAL STORM SEWER 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1513.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 626.29 BOOKING FEES Council Check Register 1000016433 5910.6406 626.29 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/10/2012 —5/10/2012 759046 511012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 359042 5/1012012 1000015417 116599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFF 141.73 717.88 DWI CASE# 11002002 286993 050312 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 717.88 PARALLEL PARTS 00004325 286920 51048392 359043 5/10/2012 PARALLEL PARTS 00004325 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 51048392 29.94 PARALLEL PARTS 00004325 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES - 286861 OB20535 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAPER TRAY 00004313 287100 2,475.08 346:28 PRINTER 00004313 359044 5/10/2012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PAPER TRAY 00004313 287102 50969498 25,000.00 PAST DUE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT 286994 08- 116- 21 -11 -00 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER 2,573.29 09 359048 5/1012012 359045 5/1012012 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 626.29 BOOKING FEES 287306 1000016433 5910.6406 626.29 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 759046 511012012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 141.73 SIGNAL REPAIR 287307 1000015417 141.73 359047 511012012 116680 HEWLETT. - PACKARD COMPANY 29.92 PARALLEL PARTS 00004325 286920 51048392 29.92 PARALLEL PARTS 00004325 286920 51048392 29.94 PARALLEL PARTS 00004325 286920 51048392 131.46 PAPER TRAY 00004313 287100 50871434 346:28 PRINTER 00004313 287101 50892731 255.04 PAPER TRAY 00004313 287102 50969498 1,750.73 LAPTOP 00004323 287103 51085309 2,573.29 359048 5/1012012 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 302.35 HAND SANITIZER, FOAM WASH 00002130 287104 600209730 302.35 359049 511012012 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 44.88 POLYURETHANE 00001195 286901 03002611 44.88 POLYURETHANE 287105 03003015 89:76 359050 511012012 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1195.6170 'COURT CHARGES 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page - 12 Business Unit DWI FORFEITURE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY REVENUES . . LEGAL SERVICES TRAFFIC SIGNALS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL (BILLING) FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 13 5/1012012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 965.38 286960 599260 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.00 287189 599483 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,021.38 359051 5110/2012 101774, HONEYWELL INC. 650.32 ALARM REPAIRS 287256 1013444 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT : 650.32 359052 5/1012012 100808. HORWATH, THOMAS 385.73 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 287308 050712 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 385.73 359053 511012012 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 269.03 MAIL LATE NOTICES 286862 62613 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 269.03 359054 5/1012012 100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES 602.58 INSTALUASSIST LOGGER INTERFAC 286995 080325 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 602.58 359055 5/10/2012 105694 INFRATECH 2,025.00 STORM SEWER CLEANING 00001188 287106 PR12269 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,025.00 359056 511012012 106347 IRRIGATION ENGINEERING INC. 2,081.29 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 286.863 12342 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 2,081.29 359057 5/1012012 124330 JEFF MARTIN COMPANY 292.50 CRANE TO REMOVE LIGHT POLE 00001213 287107 6518 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 292.50 359058 511012012 121075 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 16.90 TOILET SERVICE 00001148 287148 52349 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 16.90 287149 52345 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 32.80 287150 52347 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE . 151.23 287151 52350 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, ADAPTIVE RECREATION 18.78 287184 52346 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 236.61 369059 5110/2012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 59.35 286961 1759569 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 14 5110/2012 -5110/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9,931.15 287190 1759581 5842.5514 -COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 39.05 287191 1759582 5842.5515 COSTr'OF:GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 15.00 287192 -- 1759566 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS -SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 18.00 287193 1759567 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 336.00 287194 1759570 5862.5514 COST OF., GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,846.02 287195 1759565 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD' BEER VERNON SELLING 108.20 287257 1782984 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 16,352.77 359061 5/10/2012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 27.04- 286880 528466 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 297.54- 286881 529335 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,621.04 286962 1284149 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS 'SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .56 286963 1282820 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,995.38 286964 1284148 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING` 1.12- 286965 528426 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 84.68 287014 1288067 5822.5512 , COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 750TH ST SELLING 1,100.90 287015 1288066 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 719.44 287016 1288065 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS` SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 31.37 287017 1288062 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,338.08 287018 1288061 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,066.10 287019 1288060 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 280.39 287020 1288059 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,039.64 287021 1288078 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,049.33 287022 1288060 5862.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 794.57 287023 1288077 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .28 287024 1253454 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON'SELLING 124.50 287025 1250004 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,955.74 287026 1288079 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 501.90 287027- 1288081 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS 'SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .28 287028 1288064 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - VERNON SELLING 7,816.98 287029 1288075 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 35.37 287196 1288076 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,623.99 1287197 1288071 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,502.88 287198 1288072 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 138.85 287199 1288074 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,612.67 287200 1288068' 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 28.98 287201 1283338 5842.5513 COST OF.GOODS'SOLD.WINE YORK SELLING 6,884.64 287202 1284144 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 287203 1282818 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,961.10 287204 1288069 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 15 5/1012012 — 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit ,28 287205 1288063 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,670.59 287206 1288070 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 658.04 511012012 287207 1288073 5842.5512 COST. OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 55,313.97 1,104.21 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 287258 050212 1470.6104 359062 511012012 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 1,104.21 180 70 VACUUM REPAIR 286944 2395 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 180.70 359063 511012012 130187 KELLICK, CHRIS 956.31 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 286864 5013 WOODDALE 5900.2015 LA 359064 5/1012012 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100198 KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 37.54 CELL PHONE HOLSTER 287152 050412 1495.6406 37.54 359065 511012012 124707 KNAEBLE, PETER 1,104.21 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 287258 050212 1470.6104 1,104.21 359066 511012012 100531 KREGNESS, MICHAEL 55.00 RED PAINT FOR HOSE REEL 286996 050112 1470.6406 55.00 359067 5110/2012 130042 KULLY SUPPLY INC. 60.93 HVAC PARTS 00001358 287153 SI- 206387 1646.6530 358.22 HVAC PARTS 00001127 287154 SI- 216413 1646.6530 419.15 359068 5/10/2012 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 180.56 DWI TOW 286997 050312 2340.6103 180.56 359069 5110/2012 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 244.33 TY -RAP, CABLE TIES, WASHERS 00005195 287259 9300798480 1553.6530 244.33 359070 5/10/2012 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 273.00 287208 050312 5842.5514 280.00 287209 24756 5862.5514 CUSTOMER REFUND GENERAL SUPPLIES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET INSPECTIONS CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE DWI FORFEITURE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 518/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 16 5/1012012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No: Subledger Account Description Business Unit 553.00 359071 511012012 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 84.58 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 286998 050312 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 84.58 359072 5/10/2012 130155 MACDONELL, STEPHEN 378.00 MODEL 286929 043012 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES' : ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 378.00 359073 5/1012012 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 2,450.00. PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 287108 7864 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 2,450.00 359074 5/1012012 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 1,723.38 SOFTWARE SERVICE AGREEMENT 287109 12912 5720.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS' 1,723.38 - 359075 511012012 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 364.07 REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAINING 287155 050212 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 364.07 359076 5/1012012 101483 MENARDS 164.96 WEED & FEED, TRAPS 00002138 287110 57648 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 69.22 DROP CLOTHS, BATTERIES 00002131 287111 55344 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 6.00 PLUMBING PARTS 00001131 287156 54528 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING,MAINTENANCE 53.31 STAPLES, WRENCH 00008046. 287260 54347 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 132.18 KNIFE, BLADES, LADDER 00008045 287261 48211 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 425.67 359077 511012012 104156 MENARDS 68.54 PINE -SOL, BLEACH, FENCING 00002102 287157 17493 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 68.54 359078 5/10/2012 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 830.63 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00001793 287158 140377 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 106.77 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 287159 140356 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 883.96 FIELD TARPS FOR BRAEMAR 00001146 287160 140450 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 53.33 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00001135 287161 140429 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,874.69 359079 5/1012012 130193 METROPOLITAN AREA AGENCY ON AG CITY OF EDINA 5/812012 11:49:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300.00 TRAINING TO SERVE SESSION 286999 042512 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 359080 5110/2012 104650 MICRO CENTER 16.00 USB FLASH DRIVES 00004318 287112 3803456 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 18.13 CAMERA ACCESS FOR PW 00004332 287113 3836819 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 36.33 CAMERA ACCESS FOR.PW 00004332 287113 3836819 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 82.20 USB FLASH DRIVES FOR'EFD 00004332 287113 3836819 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 152.66 359081 5/1012012 118464 MIDWESTTESTING 25.00 METER TEST 00001546 287116 2353 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR 25.00 359082 5/1012012 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES • 98.00 HAND SOAP 00001216 287114 SOI -001565 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 98.00 359083 5/10/2012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,082.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001186 287115 34069 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,082.50 359084 511012012 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 12,701.57 WATER PURCHASE 286930 431 - 0005.300/5/ 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 2012 12,701.57 ' 359085 511012012 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 520.40 FENCE REPAIRS 287262 612102700 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 520.40 359086 5/10/2012 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 44.70 FENCE PARTS 00001140 287162 9948 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 44.70 359087 6/10/2012 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 1,158.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT 286921 629430 -2798 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 1,158.00 359088 5/1012012 101878 MINNESOTA REAL ESTATE JOURNAL 85.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 287163 043012 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 85.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 18 5/10/2012 — 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 359089 511012012 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 102.31 SPRAYER PARTS 00001217 287164 0093718 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 655.03 MOWER PARTS 00001026 287165 0093682 -IN 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 757.34 359090 511012012 105347 MOORE, CAROL 1,469.50 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 286931 050212 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,469.50 359091 5/1012012 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 42.43 TANK ASSEMBLY 00005110 286902 503035 -1F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.61 BUCKLE ASSEMBLY 00005115 287117 503210F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.04 359092 5/1012012 106668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 5 /17/12 287309 050112 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC "- OTHER EDINB_ OROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 359093 511012012 121482 NEATON'S CRANE SERVICE INC. 340.00 SET FLAG POLES- 00001155 287166 0011710 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 340.00 359094 511012012_ 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 2,000.00 SIGNS 00001618 287118 TI- 0245719 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 3,186.58 SIGNS 00001618 '287118 TI- 0245719 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 5,186.58 359095 5/1012012 104350 NIKE USA INC. 221.93 MERCHANDISE 287263 940791382 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS= PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,585.87 287264 940700499 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,807.80 359096 5/1012012 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 280.30 UNIFORMS 00005604 286903 NIA5629A 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 280.30 359097 5/10/2012 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 5113/12 287310 050112 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 75.00 359098 5/1012012 105007 NU- TELECOM CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 R55CKREG LOG20600 Council Check Register Page - 19 511012012 —5110/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 557.72 MAY SERVICE 287000 80676375 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 369099 511012012 123956 OAKS PROPERTIES 125.20 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 287311 5115 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET _CIR 125.20 359100 611012012 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 29.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 286945 1462328241 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 29.83 359101 5110/2012 130192 OLYMPIC COMMUNICATIONS INC. 57.80 PERMIT FEE REFUND 287001 ED113749 1470.4162 ALARM PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.80 359102 511012012- 100709 ORNING, DAN 90.00 REPROGRAM & TEST REGISTER 287002 050212 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG . 90.00 359103 511012012 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 344.66 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 287312 050312 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 344.66 ' 359104 5/1012012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,101.02 286966 8348144 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,226.82 287030 8348121 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,631.26 287031 8347629 -IN 5842.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 228.00 287032 8348140 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,187.10 359105 511012012 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 MONTHLY FEE 286922 16681105 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES. CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 _ 359106 511012012 101565 PENN CYCLE 127.56 BIKE PARTS 287003 220000368154 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 127.56 359107 5/10/2012 123191 PENTEON 75.00 CITY EXTRA 287265 27291 01388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 75.00 CITY EXTRA 287265 27291 01355.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 20 5/10/2012 -5/1012012 l Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 75.00 CITY EXTRA 287265 27291 01387.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD 75.00 CITY EXTRA 287265. 27291 01386.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD 75.00 CITY EXTRA 287265 27291 01368.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON 1,325.00 CITY EXTRA 287265 27291 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,700.00 359108 5/1012012 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 605.67 286946 69926214 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 168.50 287033 73227544 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 212.57 287119 69926242 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 372.80 287210 73572622 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,359.54 359109 511012012 122992 PESEK, NICOLE 2,000.00 TUITION ASSISTANCE 286923 050112 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,000.00 359110 5/1012012 119935 PET CROSSING 240.80 K9 EXAM 286924 118650- 4/30/12 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 240.80 359111 511012012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 205.60 287034 2234419 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH•ST SELLING 139.36 287035 2234423 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 499.58 287036 2234428 5862.5513 COST OF GOOD&SOLD WINE _ VERNON SELLING 148.43 287037 2234429 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,154.05 287038 2234427 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6.67- 287039 3480271 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,399.24 287211 2234424 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,768.74 287212 2234425 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 347.35 287213 2232091 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,083.84 287214 2234426 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 721.20 287215 2234422 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 694.90 287216 2234421 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,308.87 287217 2234418 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 15,464:49 359112 5/10/2012 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 46.30 PEST CONTROL 287167 3110221 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.30 359113 511012012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS. CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES CITY OF EDINA 518/2012 11:49:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 359115 611012012 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC Council Check Register Page - 21 108.00 5/10/2012 — 5110/2012 287266 259260 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 517.19 TIRES 00005127 286904 283339 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 517.19 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 359114 511012012 130007 PRICE, LUKE _ 506.61 GLOVES, ROLL TOWELS, LINERS 00002132 287120 273.36 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 286925 050212 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS. CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 273.36 359115 611012012 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 108.00 BLADE SHARPENING 287266 259260 5521.6215 108.00 359116 5110/2012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 506.61 GLOVES, ROLL TOWELS, LINERS 00002132 287120 5608 5720.6511 698.17 LINERS, TISSUE, ROLL TOWELS 00002104 287168 5604 5761.6511 1,204.78 359117 6/10/2012 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,030.63 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001229 287121 1109 4090.6406 2,030.63 359118 5/1012012 100972: R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 944.41 ZAMBONI REPAIR 286865 0049961 -IN 5521.6215 944.41 359119 5/1012012 120036 RAMAKER & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,362.50 ENGINEERING SERVICE 287004 17161 5300.1715 2,887.50 287005 17162 5300.1715 4,250.00 359120 6110/2012 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 2,829.55 REPAIRS TO RPZ VALVES 00002101 287169 13950 5761.6180 2,829.55 359121 511012012 125936 REINDERS INC. 2,333.08 FERTILIZER 00001009 287170 3013815-00 1643.6540 2,333.08 359122 5/10/2012 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. 340.07 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 287171 050212 5901.4626 340.07 369123 5/10/2012 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS. CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 PARKING RAMP SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH Council Check Register 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 570.00 TUITION ASSISTANCE 286926 043012 1400.6104 570.00 359124 5/10/2012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 42.87 101= •""•9350 286866 FIRST AID 5410.6610 SUPPLIES 217.00 101 = - -*9350 287122 042912 4075.5510 259.87 359126 5/1012012 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 749.01 RAMP ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 00001225 286905 8103186155 1375.6103 749.01 359126 5/1012012 130197 SCRIBNER, JARED 10.00 POOL PASS OVERPAYMENT REFUND 287313 050312 5301.4532 10.00 359127 5/1012012 101106 SERVICEMASTER 600.00 COMMERCIAL CLEANING 286906 36708 4095.6103 600.00 286907 36707 4095.6103 1,200.00 359128 5/1012012 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. 597.43 MK- LXT601 COMBO KIT 00001139 287172 166927 1646.6556 597.43 359129 5110/2012 130188 SOTEBEER, JUDY 22.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING REFUND 286867 043012 1628.4392.09 22.00 359130 511012012 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 347.50 WALK IN FREEZER REPAIR 287267 27718 5421.6180 247.50 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 287268 27791 5421.6180 595.00 359132 5/10/2012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 724.50 286882 1751794 5842.5513 388.50 286883 1780032 5842.5513 294.54 286967 1773494 5822.5513 35.00- 286968 1459221 5822.5513 481.00 286969 1771885 5822.5513 1,028.50 286970 1780033 5822.5513 Subleciger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SAFETY EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page- 22 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION VANVALKENBURG PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 118.00 286971 1780831 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,502.23 287040 1780868 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,092.25 287041 1780870 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,388.97 287042 1780865 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,329.00 287043 1780036 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,877.00 287044 1780035 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,092.25 287218 1780869 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,716.63 287219 1780863 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,921.00 287220 1780034 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,024.16 287221 1773495 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,398.00 287222 1780037 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 841.50 287223 1771886 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 413.85- 287224 1750996 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 324.00- 287225 1750994 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 144.00- 287226 1750597 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 29,301.18 359,133 5/1012012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 9.18 PVC PIPE PLUG 00001172 287123 S2537828.001 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 33.56 DRAIN CLEANER, SAW BLADES 00002129 287124 S2538359.001 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 42.16- CREDIT 00001149 287173 S2538355.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.81 PLUMBING PARTS 00001142 287174 52540746.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 265.12 PLUMBING PARTS 00001118 287175 52536651.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 286.51 359134 5110/2012 129745 ST LOUIS PARK DQ GRILL AND CHI 291.59 DILLY BARS 287125 580 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 291.59 359135 5/1012012 102262 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS INC. 1,442.81 CIP SOFTWARE 287126 12PLAN -IT -084 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 1,442.81 359136 5/1012012 101015 STRETCHERS 23.50 BATON HOLDER 286927 1924776 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 29.99 T -SHIRT 286928 1924032 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 53.49 359137 511012012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 144.77 MOLDING 00005159 287127 392924 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 475.00 REMOVE EXTERIOR DECALS 00005239 287128 609508 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 619.77 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 359138 511012012 1,000.00 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 359142 511012012 47.96 PUBLISH NOTICE 1,893.35 287227 504.00 ICE ARENA AD 287228 688037 551.96 359139 511012012 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 600.00 FITNESS TRAINING 257289 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 40.00 359140 6/1012012 104932 TAYLOR -MADE 67.96 MERCHANDISE 91.93 393.35 102.88 111.15 111.15- 139.65 139.65- 229.90 229.90- 111.15 111.15- 403.75 403.75- 411.35 411.35- 179.52 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description ti 286908 1372756 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 287269 1366136 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 286947 230856 287270 17591475 287271 17624017 287272 17657327 287273 17663399 287274 17492547 287275 17728204 287276 .17495721 287277 17728202 287278 17495723 287279 17728325 287280 17503851 287281 17728203 287282 17512740 287283 17728327 287284 17549140 287285 17728200 287286 17512741 287287 17727699 359141 5/1012012 102987 TEEMASTER CORPORATION 1,000.00 MONTHLY SERVICE 00006000 287288 201210032 1,000.00 359142 511012012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1,893.35 287227 688038 151.05 287228 688037 2,044.40 359143 511012012 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 600.00 FITNESS TRAINING 257289 INV456 5421.6102 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5410.6230 5862.5514 5862.5515 1470.6104 'CONTRACTUAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO'SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page - 24 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION GRILL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP'RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO'SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5/812012 11:49:53 Page 25 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 261.82 GOLF BALLS 287290 0459623 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 37 00- CREDIT 287291 6055222 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 224.82 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 359148 511012012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Council Check Register 13.94 GAS DIFFUSER 00005023 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 1553.6556 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 441088 1553.6580 600.00 SUPPLIES 44.45 359144 611012012 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 359149 5/10/2012 291.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 286868 2012 -70917 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 286868 2012 -70917 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER- - 5822.6406 GENERAL 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 286868 2012 -70917 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 286869 863337 875.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 359145 511012012 286869 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 418.75 DRAFT MINUTES 4/17/12 286909 M19030 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 418.75 511012012 116535 TRAVELERS 359146 5110/2012 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 3,634.00 DEDUCTIBLE 287314 22.23 SPRING, CLIPS 00005162 286910 9CO5919 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,634.00 22.23 359147 5110/2012 101474 TITLEIST 5/812012 11:49:53 Page 25 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 261.82 GOLF BALLS 287290 0459623 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 37 00- CREDIT 287291 6055222 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,970.00 JOB EVALUATION STUDY 287315 213443 4412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMP STUDY PROJECT 5,970.00 369162 511012012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 21,875.18 CUSHMAN TURF TRUCKSTER 00001780 287006 TE01127 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 224.82 359148 511012012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 13.94 GAS DIFFUSER 00005023 286911 391468 1553.6556 TOOLS 30.51 WELDING GAS 00005246 287292 441088 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 44.45 359149 5/10/2012 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 379.94 P.O.S. SCANNERS 286869 863337 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 379.94 P.O.S. SCANNERS 286869 863337 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 379.94 P.O.S. SCANNERS 286869 863337 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,139.82' 359150 511012012 116535 TRAVELERS 3,634.00 DEDUCTIBLE 287314 000408876 1550.6200 INSURANCE 3,634.00 359151 5110/2012 130066 TRUSIGHT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,970.00 JOB EVALUATION STUDY 287315 213443 4412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMP STUDY PROJECT 5,970.00 369162 511012012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 21,875.18 CUSHMAN TURF TRUCKSTER 00001780 287006 TE01127 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 26 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21,875.18 359153 5/10/2012 103048 U.S. BANK 425.00 PAYING AGENT 286912 3113629 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 425.00 359154 511012012 103048 U.S. BANK 425.00 PAYING AGENT 286913 3113630 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 425.00 359155 5/10/2012 103048 U.S. BANK 755.75 HSA MAINT FEE 287176 7519439 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 755.75 359156 5/1012012 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 4,763.84 VIB PLATES, PARTS 00001867 287129 102273839 - 001 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4,763.84 359157 5/10/2012 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 286.42 HYDRANT WRENCHS 00001173 287130 652864 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 286.42 359158 511012012 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 752.38 CUPS, LINERS, TISSUE 286948 233992 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 325.05 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 287131- 232525 -01 5862.6512 ,PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING . 314.00 LIQUOR BAGS, ROLL TOWELS 00007513 287132 "`232525 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON.SELLING 59.06- CREDIT 287133 232713CI 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 340.66 LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00001136 287177 234172 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 386.50 LIQUOR BAGS 287293 233994 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 2,059.53 359159 5/1012012 130198 WEIDNER, PAUL 47.14 SPRAY TAN 287316 050312 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 PERFORMANCE FEE 287316 050312 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 147.14 359160 5/1012012 127768 WIGLEY AND ASSOCUITES 525.00 WEBSITE- ENGAGEMENT SITE 287134 0000054 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 525.00 359161 5/10/2012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,122.15 287045 298449 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING`' R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 226.30 587.55 136.00- 1,800.00 359162 511012012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,120.00 3,053.36 2,666.09 546.72 177.33 - 210.24- 2,008.01 747.93 560.00 49.33- 10,265.21 359164 511012012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,103.59 5,024.78 121.05 10,059.93 21.42 65.55 895.15 4,324.17 13,824.04 9,865.64 30.10 1,550.17 4,555.40 1,404.46 34.53 1,728.75 201.39- 18.71- 6,823.05 1,619.25 133.62- 62,697.31 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Doc No Inv No Account No 287046 298448 -00 5822.5513 287047 298596-00 5862.5513 287048 296920 -00 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 518/2012 11:49:53 Page- 27 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 287049 406865 .5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 287050 407516 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 287051 407518 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 287052 407514 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 287053 57599 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 287054 57550 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 287229 407517 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 287230 407515 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 287231 406864 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 287232 57598 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 286972 735521 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 286973 738199 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 286974 739321 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 287055 739319 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 287056 737199 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 287057 739320 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 287058 738198 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 287059 737358 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 287060 739325 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 287061 737359 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 287062 739326 5642.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING' 287063 739324 5822.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 287064 738203 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 287065 739322 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 287066 739323 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 287067 738202 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 287068 - 857732 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 287069 859044 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 267233 738205 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 287234 740837 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 287235 859045 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012 .11:49:53 Council Check Register Page - 28 5/10/2012 - 5/10/2012 Check 9 Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 369166 5110/2012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 179.30 286975 891471 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,650.65 286976 891470 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 818.40 286977 891813 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,100.50 266978 891450 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,001.10 286979 892374 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 286980 892375 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 360.00 286981 892376 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,908.51 287236 894501 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,039.96 359166 5/1012012 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 1,146.09 PICNIC TABLE 286949 276209 2401.4761 OTHER REVENUE - GOVT FUND BRAEMAR MEMORIAL REVENUE 1,146.09 359167 5/1012012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 1,715.83 51- 5547446 -1 286870 _ 323152665 1628.6185, LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 407.66 51- 6229265 -9 286871 323168180 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,602.95 51- 6229265 -9 286871 323168180 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 284.27 51- 6046826 -0 286872 323161830 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 37.35 51- 8102668 -0 286873 323014757 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,094.72 51- 9251919 -0 286874 323038283 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 665.81 51- 5634814 -2 286875 323154242 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 378.46 51- 5938955 -6 286876 323162545 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 6,767.08 51- 6955679 -8 286932 323349196 1551.6185 LIGHT &POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 20.78 51- 4151897 -6 287178 323456781 1646.6185 LIGHT &POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.38 51- 7567037 -0 287179 ., 323509671 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 504.15 51- 6137136 -8 287186 323487334 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 124.34 51 -4827232 -6 287181 323470840 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 18,799.48 51-4888627-1, 287182 323467990 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,568.81 51- 4159265 -8 287183 322614121 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 757.76 51- 5847121 -5 287317 323646676 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER - TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 35,764.83 359168 5/1012012 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 38.23 APR USAGE - BLDG/ENG 00004322 287294 061344456 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 184.08 APR USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 287295 061344457 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 222.31 359169 511012012 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 12,610.00 FUEL 00005975 287135 4/27/2012 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5110/2012 — 5110/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 6,645.80 UNLEADED FUEL 00005975 287296 487063 1553.6581 19,255.80 359170 5/1012012 129844 YOGA CENTER OF MINNEAPOLIS 85.00 FITNESS TRAINING 287297 050212 1470.6104 85.00 359171 5110/2012 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 566.00 287237 11047 5842.5513 566.00 359172 511012012 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 172.73 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 286877 54068475 5510.6513 172.73 359173 5/10/2012 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 353,674.67 SEWER SERVICE 287353 0000986121 5922.6302 353,674.67 Subledger Account Description GASOLINE 5/8/2012 11:49:53 Page - 29 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING OFFICE SUPPLIES SEWER SERVICE METRO 1,052,467.62 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,052,467.62 Total Payments 1,052,467.62 ARENA ADMINISTRATION SEWER TREATMENT R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2012. 11:50:45 Council Check Summary Page - 1 5/10/2012 - 5110/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 149,760.11 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,932.38 02400 BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND 1,146.09 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 425.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 13,042.08 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 21,875.18 05100 ART CENTER FUND 422.71 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 105.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 110,751.34 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 12,240.46 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 33,471.89 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 5,304.21 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,923.38 05800 LIQUOR FUND 229,766.29 05900 UTILITY FUND 418,992.63 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,389.33 05950 RECYCLING FUND 39,958.20 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,961.34 Report Totals 1,052,467.62 We confirm to thetest of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply, In all�material- respects with the requirements of the City of Edinazpqrchasing:pollcles and proced .n�n+ irk 1eir A CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 2/28112- 3/27/12 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account 0017825144 MATT SISTERMAN 2012/03/18 $62.98 DVD.DRIVE AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1554.6406 0017825144 MATT SISTERMAN 2012/03/14 ($662.80) WHOLESALE TRADE. PROVANTAGE LLC NORTH CANTON OH 5410.6409 0017906043 LISA SCHAEFER 2012/03/23 $58.06 MEETING D'AMICO & SONS EDINA EDINA MN 1120.6106 0017917693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/02/28 $911.82 STATION SUPPLIES BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1470.6406 0017917693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/03/08 $175.21 STATION SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1470.6406 0017917693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/03/08 $730.60 CARDS SQ "CHOICE MARKETING, INC BOOTHWYN PA 1470.6406 0017917693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/03/08 $117.15 STATION SUPPLIES PARTSELECT 888 - 895 -1535 TRURO NS 1470.6530 0017917693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/03/13 $11.98 MEETING JERRY'S FOODS EDINA MN 1470.6406 0017917693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/03/12 $309.15 STATION SUPPLIES RESTAURANT-EQUIPPERS 800 - 235 -3325 OH 1470.6406 0017917693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/03/20 $1,499.94 SAFETY CLOTHING STREICHER'S MO PLYMOUTH MN 1495.6558 0017917693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/03/22 $10.51 MEETING HOLIDAY STNSTORE 0217_ EDINA MN 1470.6106 0017680168 SCOTT NEAL 2012%03/05 $21.70 MEETING EDEN AVENUE GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 0017680168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/03/09 $33.89 MEETING PINSTRIPES ' EDINA` MN 1120.6106 0017680168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/03/08 $19.00 PARKING FIFTY SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS MN 1120.6106 0017680168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/03/21 $10.00 PARKING IP JACKSON RAMP ST. PAUL MN 1120.6106 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/02/28 $743.92 POS PRINTERS AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILL WA 541.0.6409 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012102/29 $819.99 SOFTWARE AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1130.6103 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/02 $245.00 DUES MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPA 952 - 831 -2707 MN 1160.6105 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/07 $93.00 TRAINING MNSPECT, LLCMELCOME.HOM1952- 442 -7520 MN 1495.6104 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/08 $85.00 SEMINAR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1. 651- 2845722 MN 1495.6104 . 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/08 $170.00 SEMINAR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 -651- 2845722 MN 1495.6104 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/08 $85.00 SEMINAR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 651- 2845722 MN 1495.6104 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/16 $38.00 CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITI 612- 7207667 MN 1140.6104 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/16 $48.00 CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITI 612- 7207667 MN 1140.6104 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/21 ($673.00) EQUIPMENT AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 5410.6409 0017680176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/03/20 $136.02 MEETING D BRIAN'S DELI MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 0017680143 DEB MANGEN 2012/03/06, $108.61 COUNCIL MEETING FRANCE 44 FOODS MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 0017680143 DEB MANGEN 2012/03/07 $426.60 AIRFARE DELTA AIR 0062300040993 DELTA.COM CA 1180.6104 0017680143 DEB MANGEN 2012/03/08 $27.73 TRAVEL INS TRAVEL INSURANCE POLICY 800- 729 -6021 VA 1180.6104 0017680143 DEB MANGEN 2012/03/23 $286.56 LODGING BEST WESTERN HOTELS ST. CLOUD MN 1180.6104 0017680184 ROBERT WILSON 2012/03/02 $465.00 SUBSCRIPTION PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPER 800- 3254936 MO 1190.6105 0017680101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/07 $265.00 UTILITY PERMITS HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC WORKS 612- 5960236 MN 07101.1705.20 0017680101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/08 $191.42 PARTS EDWARDS MANUFACTURING C( 507 - 3738206 MN 1553.6556 0017680101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/12 $10.71 PARTS ROCKLER WOOD" 952 - 542 -0111 MN 1400.6406 0017680101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/09 $535.00 REGISTRATION ATSSA 540 - 3681701 VA 1281.6104 G: \Purchasing cards\2012 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 4/27/2012 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 2/28112- 3/27/12 Account Name Date Amount Description Meechant Name City State Account 0017680101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/16 $5.67 PARTS ROCKLER WOOD* 952- 542 -0111 MN 1400.6406 0017680101 WAYNE HOULE •2012/03/19. $53.58 TRAINING., SKILLPATH SEMINARS MAIN 913 - 3623900 KS 1260.6406 0017680101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/19 $127.84 PARTS MILLS FLEET FARM #2,500 LAKEVILLE' MN 1553.6530 0017994882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2012/03/14 $64.36 PROPANE SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN 1301.6406 0017994882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2012/03/15 $225.21 PROPANE SUPERAMERICA 4047 `EDINA MN 1552.6406 0017994882 ANDERSON'SHAWN 2012/03/19 $84:41 PARTS EDELMANN & ASSOCIATES 612- 5597867, MN 1318.6406 0017680135 JEFF LONG 2012%02/27 $176.99 DIGITAL CAMERA AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1400.6406 0017680135 JEFF LONG 2612/02/27 $14.60 ADAPTER 3GSTORE.COM/MDG COM 847 -462 -4004 IL 1400.6160 0017680135 JEFF LONG 2012/03/01 $447.98 KEYBOARDS SUPERWAREHOUSE BUSINESS 786- 4061737 FL 1400.6406 0017680135 JEFF LONG 2012/03/09. $598.00 TRAINING APCO -INT'L 386 -944 -2422 FL 2310.6104 0017680135 JEFF LONG 2012/03/20 $85.90 TRAINING PAY-PAL `STCLOUDCVB 402- 935 - 7733 CA 1400.6104 0017680135 JEFF LONG 2012/03/22 $349.00 TRAINING APCO -INT'L 386- 944 -2422 FL 2310.6104 0017680135 JEFF LONG 2012/03/22 $525.00 TRAINING EB *CHICK -FIL -A LEADER EVENTBRITE.CO CA 1400.6104 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/02/27 $59:00 DUES MN RECREATION AND PARK A 763- 571 -1305 MN 1600.6105 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/02/28 $543.84: PAINT STRIPPER ALDON TILE & MAS -CHEM 406- 892 -0433 MT 5761.6511 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/02/29 $100.00' POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800- 468 -8454 CT 5710.6235 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/02/28 $98.80 ADAPTIVE BOWLING BRUNSWICK ZONE -EDEN PR •EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629:6406 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012103%01 $35.00 PRIZES BUNNY'S BAR & GRILL ST LOUIS.PARK MN 4077.6406 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/03/01 $35.61 POSTAGE PB METER RENTAL 800 -228 -1071 CT 5710.6235 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/03/05 $125.00 BASE CAMP BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAINT. PAUL MN 1624.6406 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/03/06 $80`00 GROUP. ADMISSION HISTORY CENTER ADMISSIONS 651- 2593173 MN 1629.6406 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/03/08 $50.00 PRIZES BUNNY'S BAR & GRILL ST LOUIS PARK MN 4077.6406 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/03/17 $52.00' ADAPTIVE BOWLING BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN PR. EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629.6406 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/03/20 $100.00 PLAYGROUND TT PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1624.6406 0017680119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/03/23 $109.20 ADAPTIVE BOWLING BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN PR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629.6406 0017680085 JENNIFER BENNERO' 2012/02/27 $5.00 SPAM FILTER AKSMT.COM 877 - 273 -8550 CA 1130.6124 0017680085 JENNIFER BENNERO' 2012/03/07 $49.00 SUBSCRIPTION CTO *GOTOMEETING.COM 800 - 263 -6317 CA 1495.6103 0017680085 JENNIFER BENNERO' 2012/03/07 $52.56 OTHER DRI *TELESTREAM WWW.ESLR8.COM MN 1130.6103 0017680085 JENNIFER BENNERO' 2012/03/13 $275 :00 AIGA DUES AMERICAN INST OF GRAPHIC 212 - 807 -1990 NY 1130.6105 0017680085 JENNIFER BENNERO' 2012/03/13 $150.00 CONFERENCE PAYPAL *3CMA 402- 935 -7733 DC 1130.6104 0017680085 JENNIFER BENNERO' 2012/03/13 $38.00 FONTS MYFONTS 617 -497 -6222 MA 1130.6406 0017680085 JENNIFER BENNERO' 2012/03/14 $86.95_ SUPPLIES ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800- 2280475 NE 1130.6406 0017905821 AMY SMITH 2012/03/06 $776.45 41CD MONITORS MONOPRICE INC 909 - 989 -6887 CA 5410.6406 0017905821 AMY SMITH 2012/03/22 $55.57 BAGS Al VACUUM SOLUTIONS 'MINNEAPOLIS MN 5430.6406 0017905821 AMY SMITH 2012/03/22 $12.84 FABRIC JO -ANN ETC #2026 EDINA MN 5410.6406 G: \Purchasing cards\2012 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 4/27/2012 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 2/28/12- 3/27/12 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account 0017980667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/03/09 $1,049.80 PRESSURE WASHER NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT BURNSVILLE MN 5761.6406 0017980667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/03/12 $362.56 PAINT STRIPPER ALDON TILE & MAS CHEM 406 - 892 -0433 MT 5761.6511 0017680093 STEVEN,GRAUSAM 2012/02/29 $81.07 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5800.1720 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/09 $13.81 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5800.1720 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/09 $39.66 LABELS WASP BAR CODE TECHN 9728815500 TX 5822.6406 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/09 $52.16 LABELS WASP-BAR CODE TECHN 9728815500 TX 5842.6406 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/09. $39.64 LABELS WASP BAR CODE TECHN 9728815500 TX 5862.6406 0017680093 ,STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/13, $7.48 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5800.1720 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/13 $23.11 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5800.1720 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/14 $49.83 EATING /DRINKING TACO BELL 3308 EDINA MN 5842.6406 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/16 $12.70 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5800.1720 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/16 1$7.90 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON . MN 5800.1720 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/18 $401.21 BLINDS THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5800.1720 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/20 $285.57 DOOR LOCKS BLOOMINGTON SECURIT 612 - 881 -0896 MN 5800.1720 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM... 2012/03/23 .$19.95 SOFTWARE AVANQUEST NORTH AMERIC 800 - 3956682 CA 5842.6406 0017680093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/03/22 $12.69 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5800.1720 0101466379 WAYNE HOULE 2012/02/27 $92.52 IGNITOR CE SUNDBERG CO 13 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1646.6406 0101466379 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/02 $57.90 SANDPAPER ACME TOOLS #220 PLYMOUTH MN 1301.6406 0101466379 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/02 $227.82 CARBERATOR NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT BURNSVILLE MN 1553.6530 0101466379 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/05 $125.00 TRAINING AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS DAN.PAVLICH @C MO 1281.6104 0101466379 WAYNE HOULE 2012/03/06 $48.24 MULCH PETCO 606 63506067 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1648.6406 $16,075.73 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici procedures G: \Purchasing cards\2012 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx I/" l oy Al 4/27/2012 A jN ow Le � v � �y �ieas To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.0 From: Cary Teague, Community ® Action Development Director Discussion Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -62 Denying Preliminary Plat, Subdivision & Variances, JMS, Brookview Avenue Deadline June 15, 2012 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached Resolution No. 2012 -62, denying a Preliminary Plat, Subdivision and Variances at 6120 Brookview for JMS Custom Homes. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At the May 1, 2012 meeting, the City Council directed staff to draft findings and a resolution denying the applicants above mentioned request. The attached resolution has been drafted by staff and the city attorney denying the request. Planning Commission Recommendation: On March 28, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposed Preliminary Plat and Variances subject to the findings outlined in the staff report dated March 28, 2012. Vote for denial: 8 -1. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2012 -62 denying a Preliminary Plat, Subdivision and Variances at 6120 Brookview for JMS Custom Homes. 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-62 .�y 1 DENYING A PRELIMINARY PLAT, SUBDIVISION, AND VARIANCES ° FOR PROPERTY AT 6120 BROOKVIEW AVENUE IN EDINA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City. of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City Of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 JMS Custom Homes, LLC ( "Applicant ") has applied for preliminary plat approval, subdivision approval, and zoning variances for property with a street address of 6120 Brookview Avenue legally described as: Lots 5 and 6, Block 23, Fairfax, Hennepin County, Minnesota ( "Subject Property "). 1.02 Applicant is a spec house builder that builds houses and then looks for buyers. 1.03 Applicant purchased the Subject Property in 2009. Applicant removed a house and constructed a new house off to one side of the property. Applicant proposes to subdivide the Subject Property and construct a second spec house. 1.04 The two lots that constitute the Subject Property are held in common ownership by Applicant. Subsection 850.07, Subd. 20B4a of the Zoning Ordinance provides: "If a non - conforming lot or parcel is, or at any time since October 22,1951, has been, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining or abutting parcel or lot which together comply with, or come close to complying with, the minimum width, depth, area, and lot width to perimeter ratio, requirements of this Section, then such non - conforming lot or parcel and such adjoining or abutting parcel or lot shall be considered as one lot and shall not be decreased in size below such minimum requirements. If in a group of two or more adjoining or abutting lots or parcels owned or controlled by the same person, any single lot or parcel does not meet the full minimum depth, width, area or lot width to perimeter ratio requirements of this Section, such single lot or parcel shall not be considered as a separate lot or parcel able to be conveyed and developed under this Code." 1.05 The Subject Property is guided Single Family Residential under the City's Comprehensive Plan and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 1.06 Applicant proposes to subdivide and plat the Subject Property into two lots: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Fairfax 4th Addition. 1.07 Applicant has applied for multiple zoning variances: 1. Lot width variances from the 75 feet required in the R -1 zoning district to 50 feet for each lot. 2. Lot area variances from the 9,000 square feet required in the R -1 zoning district to 6,676 square feet for the proposed Lot 1 and 6,671 square feet for the proposed Lot 2. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -62 Page Two 3. Lot depth variance from the 133.8 feet in the R -1 zoning district to 133.7 feet for the proposed Lot 2. 1.08 On March 28, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the preliminary plat, subdivision and variances. 1.09 On April 17, 2012, the City Council held a public hearing and continued action on the applications to May 1, 2012. 1.10 On May 1, 2012, the City Council directed preparation of findings for denial of the preliminary plat, subdivision and variances. Section 2. FINDINGS. 2.01 The proposed plat and subdivision do not meet ordinance standards for a subdivision, because the proposed lots do not meet the minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements for lot area, lot width, and lot depth. 2.02 The variance standards have not been met: 1. The Subject Property is a conforming single - family residential lot with a new single - family house and has a taxable market value of $801,700.00. Reasonable use of the property exists today. 2. The proposed variances are not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance which is to require nonconforming lots in common ownership to be developed as a single parcel. 3. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance standards. Applicant does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the zoning ordinance. The Subject Property is only 4,347 square feet larger than the required minimum lot size. The proposed lots which are approximately 25% below the minimum lot size requirement are not reasonable. 4. The practical difficulty is self- created by Applicant's proposal to subdivide the property. 5. The need for the variance is created only by Applicant's desire to maximize the return on its investment. Such economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. 6. There are no circumstances unique to the Subject Property that justify granting multiple variance to enable the Applicant to create nonconforming lots. The Subject Property is similar in size to several lots in the neighborhood including the lots on both sides of the Subject Property. :RESOLUTION NO. 2012-62 Page Three 7. Applicant's decision to build the existing house on one side of the Subject Property rather then in the center does not make the Subject Property unique. Section 3. The preliminary plat, subdivision and variances are denied. Adopted this 15th day of May, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA James B. Hovland, Mayor COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. City Clerk ow e v � • l�CO11 BS REPORURECOIV MENDAT'ION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. D. From: Lisa Schaefer Human Resources Director Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Ordinance No. 2012 -12 Amending Section 150 Personnel Policy ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2012 -12. BACKGROUND /INFORMATION: The City's Personnel Policy is currently outlined in Section 150 of the City Code. From both a legal and practical perspective, it is not advisable to outline personnel policies in City Code. City ordinances have the force and effect of law, while personnel policies are meant to be written guidelines for managing internal employees. Setting personnel policies within an ordinance provides less flexibility and greater legal liability for the City. The City Attorney and staff recommend 1 from City Code. Personnel policies will be other internal policies and procedures. ATTACHMENT: ® Ordinance # 2012 -12 iat specific personnel policies be removed maintained by the City Manager along with ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING CITY PERSONNEL THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter 1, Section 150 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide: "Section 150 — CITY PERSONNEL SECTION 150.01. CITY MANAGER; POWERS AND DUTIES. City Manager. The City Manager shall be appointed by the Council and shall serve at the Council's pleasure. The Manager shall be the chief administrative officer of the City and all departments of the City shall be under the overall control. of the City Manager. The City Manager shall have the following general duties and responsibilities: Subd 1. Appointment of personnel. Appoint, direct, and remove, upon the basis of merit and fitness, all City staff including the City Clerk, heads of all departments, and all subordinate staff. Subd 2. City Departments. Plan the organization of City staff and assign appropriate responsibility and authority for the efficient and effective delivery of City services. Subd 3. Budget. Prepare and administer the annual City budget; develop compensation plans and personnel policies for City staff consistent with good management practices. Subd 4. Purchasing Agent. Serves as chief purchasing agent of the City. Subd 5. Council Agendas. Prepare Council agendas and information for Council meetings with appropriate staff research and recommendations. Subd 6. Communication. Communicate effectively with Council members, City staff, news media, other governmental agencies, and the public. Subd 7. Appointment of City Attorney. The City Manager, with the consent of the Council, shall appoint.a City Attorney, who shall serve at the pleasure of the Council. The City Attorney shall perform such duties as are required by law or referred by the Council. Subd 8. Appointment of City Clerk. The City Manager shall appoint a City Clerk. It shall be the duty of the City Clerk to carry out the provisions of State Statute §412.151. Subd 9. Appointment of City Treasurer. The City Manager shall appoint a City Treasurer, who shall carry out the provisions of State Statute §412.141. Subd 10. Additional Duties and Authority. The City Manager shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the statutes relating to Optional Plan B cities, or required by ordinance or resolutions adopted by the Council. SECTION 150.02. PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS. The City Manager may promulgate personnel rules setting forth the rights, duties and responsibilities of employees. Such rules may from time to time be amended." SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective, immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: May 15, 2012 Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two Affidavits of Publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 0 �I vCO11BB 88 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.E. From: Solvei Wilmot ® Action Environmental Health F-1 Discussion Special ist/Recyc l i n g Coordinator Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Authorizing Grant Agreement with Hennepin County — Municipal Recycling Collection Program ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the City of Edina to enter into an agreement with Hennepin County to accept funding for the Edina municipal recycling collection program by adopting Resolution 2012 -77. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Edina's recycling program applies for grant money through the Hennepin County Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE) fund. In order to be eligible to receive the monies Edina must enter into an agreement to receive the funds and use them for the residential recycling program. The City of Edina received $118,351 in 2011. It is anticipated that Edina will receive $116,721 in 2012. The reduced amount is due to a reduction in the total grant dollars available. Attachments: Copy of Resolution 2012 -77 Copy Hennepin County's Residential Recycling Grant Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 2012-77 AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO A 2012 -2015 MUNICIPAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT-WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Edina operates a recycling program consistent with Minnesota Statutes 115A.02 and 115A.03, as amended by the Laws:of Minnesota 1992, Chapter, 685, and Minnesota Statutes, 473.8011; and WHEREAS, the Edina Recycling Program is consistent with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan, the Hennepin County Solid Waste Master Plan; and the Hennepin County's Residential Recycling Funding Policy; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board has adopted a Resolution authorizing funding for Municipal Recycling Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into an Agreement with Hennepin County to accept funding for the Edina Recycling Program. Adopted this 15th day of May 2012. Attest, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk , Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY.CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is;a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 15, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 2012. Debra A. Mangen, City.Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 Contract No: A120105 RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT This Agreement is between the COUNTY.OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, A -2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 (the "COUNTY "), on behalf of the Hennepin, County Department of Environmental Services, 701 Fourth Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 -1600 ("DEPARTMENT") and the CITY OF EDINA, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 ("CITY".). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS', the County Board, by Resolution No..I 1 -0476S 1, adopted on November 29, 2011, approved the Hennepin. County Residential Recycling Funding Policy.;( "Funding Policy ") for the period January 1, 2012, through December 34, 2015, and authorized grant funding for municipal recycling programs consistent with the Funding Policy; and .. WHEREAS, the CITY operates a municipal curbside residential recycling program and other waste reduction and recycling activities (the "Recycling Program ") as described in the grant application (the "Grant Application ") referred to in Section 2 below; and WHEREAS, the Recycling Program is consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 115A; the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan; Hennepin County's Solid Waste Management Master Plan; and Hennepin County's Residential Recycling Funding Policy. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the COUNTY, on behalf of the DEPARTMENT, and the CITY agree as follows: 1. TERM AND COST OF THE AGREEMENT a. This Agreement shall commence upon execution and terminate on December 31, 2015. b. The total grant payment for the year 2012. shall be equal to one hundred sixteen thousand seven hundred twenty -one dollars ($116,721). Grant payments for subsequent years shall be calculated as set forth in Section 3. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED a.... The CITY shall operate the Recycling Program as more fully described in the Funding Policy and the.Grant Application. The CITY agrees to submit an updated Grant Application by February 15 of each year of the term of this Agreement in order to be eligible for grant funds. The application consists of the Re -TRAC web -based report and a planning document submitted to the COUNTY describing the programs or activities the CITY will implement to. increase recycling and make progress toward COUNTY goals. The terms of the Grant Application, as updated each year; are incorporated herein by reference. b. In addition to the services referred to above, the CITY agrees as follows: 1) Requests for Proposals and Contracts. a.) If contracting for curbside recycling services, the CITY shall require a breakout of the following expenses when renewing or soliciting new proposals or bids for recycling services: • Containers — if provided by the hauler; • Collection service; • Processing cost per ton; • Revenue sharing. b.) The COUNTY recommends the CITY request the following information in the Request for Proposal/Bid or contract: • Destination of recyclable materials, including the facility name, location, and end market; • Monthly prices for recyclable materials by material type; • Residue rates at the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF); • Composition of residue. 2) Materials to be Collected. At a minimum, the CITY shall collect the following materials curbside: a.) Newspaper and inserts; b.) Cardboard boxes; c.) Glass food and beverage containers; d.) Metal food and beverage cans; e.) All plastic containers and lids, #1 — Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET, PETE), #2 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), #3 — Vinyl Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), #4 — Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and #5 — Polypropylene (PP) plastic bottles, except those that previously contained hazardous materials or motor oil; f.) Magazines and catalogs; g.) Cereal, cracker, pasta, cake mix, shoe, gift, and electronics boxes; h.) Boxes from toothpaste, medications and other toiletries; L) Aseptic and gable- topped containers; and j.) Mail, office and school papers. 3) Collection Methods. The CITY shall use one of the following systems to collect materials at the curb: a.) Single sort system - all materials combined in one container; or b.) Dual sort system - glass, metal and plastic together with paper separate. If one of these two systems is not currently in place, the CITY must submit a plan with their 2012 Grant Application for converting to a single or dual sort system by December 31, 2012. If the CITY is unable to meet this deadline, an alternative implementation plan must be negotiated with and approved by the 2 COUNTY. The implementation plan will include the reasons why an extension is needed, the projected timeline, and details about each step of the process. The CITY will also provide the COUNTY with updates to the plan as implementation progresses. 4) Education and Outreach: The CITY shall: a.) Use COUNTY; terminology when describing recycling guidelines (i.e. description of materials accepted and not accepted, preparation guidelines, etc.) b.) Use images provided by the COUNTY or the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board (SWMCB) if using images of recyclables. c.) Use the COUNTY'.s terminology_, preparation guidelines and images on the CITY's website. d.) Mail a recycling guide once a year to residents using a template developed jointly through a communications committee and produced and printed by the COUNTY at the COUNTY's expense. If the CITY does not want to use the template produced by the COUNTY, the CITY may develop its own guide at the municipality's expense, but it must be approved by the COUNTY. If the CITY relies on the hauler to provide the recycling guide, this guide would also require approval by the COUNTY. e.) Complete two additional education activities from.a menu of options developed by the communications committee to support the priority message campaign. Templates will be provided by the COUNTY. Any print material that communicates residential recycling guidelines that were not provided by the COUNTY template will require COUNTY approval. This does not apply to waste reduction and reuse, articles on recycling that do not include guidelines, and social media posts. The COUNTY will respond within five business days to any communication piece submitted. 5) Use of Grant Funds. a.) Grant funds can be used for all Recycling Program expenses including capital and,operating costs. Expenses associated with residential collection of organics are considered eligible Recycling Program expenses. However, yard waste expenses are not, eligible Recycling Program expenses. If organics and.yard waste are commingled, the organics expenses must be tracked separately. b.) All grant funds accepted from the'COUNTY must be used for Recycling Program capital and operating expenses in the year granted. c.) The CITY may not charge its residents through property tax, utility fees or any other method for that portion of the costs of its Recycling Program funded by COUNTY grant funds. d.) The CITY shall establish a separate accounting mechanism, such as a project number, activity number, or fund that will separate recycling and waste reduction revenues and expenditures from other municipal activities, including solid waste and yard waste activities. 3 e.) Recycling and waste reduction activities, revenues, and expenditures are subject to audit by the COUNTY. f.) The CITY shall not retain any grant funds in excess of actual Recycling Program expenses. g.) If the CITY does not contract for curbside recycling services, the C17FY will receive grant funds provided that at least ninety percent (90 %) of the grant funds are credited back to residents and the CITY meets all minimum program requirements. The additional ten percent (10 %) may be used for CITY administrative and promotional expenses. 6) Reporting Requirements. a.) The CITY shall submit an annual recycling report to the COUNTY utilizing the Re -TRAC web -based reporting system by February 15 of each year. If the CITY is unable to access the Re -TRAC system, the COUNTY must be contacted by February 1 to make arrangements for alternative filing of the required report. b.) The CITY will not report residue as a part of recycling tonnages. The CITY will make arrangements with its hauler to report residue separately. c.) The CITY shall annually measure the participation rate in the curbside Recycling Program during the month of October. The rate will be calculated by dividing the number of households setting out recycling by the total number of households (accounts) with recycling service. The participation rate will be reported in Re -TRAC. d.) The CITY shall submit an annual planning document to the COUNTY describing the programs or activities the CITY will implement to increase recycling and make progress toward COUNTY goals. e.) To help monitor progress, the CITY shall provide an update on recycling tonnages and program activities to the COUNTY upon request. The CITY shall then provide the quarterly tonnage report received from its haulers or make arrangements with the haulers to send the information directly to the COUNTY. 7) Recycling Performance. On an annual basis, the CITY shall demonstrate that a reasonable effort has been made to maintain and increase the average amount of recyclables collected from their residential Recycling Program to at least 725 pounds per household or achieve a minimum recovery rate of 80% by December 31, 2015. Alternatively, if the CITY has a method in place to accurately measure total waste generation (garbage and recycling), then the CITY may choose a 35% recycling rate as the performance standard. To ensure the accuracy of data for these metrics the CITY will be required, upon request, to provide documentation on the methodology used to calculate performance. To the extent practicable, the results should rely on actual data rather than estimates. Failure by the CITY to demonstrate measureable progress towards one of these goals will result in the requirement that a Recycling Improvement Plan be submitted by the CITY within 90 days of being notified by the COUNTY. The Recycling Improvement Plan must be negotiated with and approved by 4 the COUNTY. The Recycling Improvement Plan will include actions the CITY will take to improve the performance of its Recycling Program to achieve the 20.15 goals. The plan will focus on program changes. and additional activities in the following areas: materials collected, sort method, type of container, frequency of collection, education and outreach, performance measurement, contract management, and incentives. Funding will.be withheld until the CITY's Recycling Improvement Plan is approved by the COUNTY. In cooperation with the COUNTY, the CITY maybe required to participate in waste and recycling sorts to identify recovery levels of various recyclables in their community. Based on the_,results of the study, the COUNTY and the CITY will collaborate to increase the recovery of select recyclable materials being discarded in significant quantities. 8) Public Entity Recycling. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section §115A.151, the CITY shall ensure that facilities under its control, from which mixed municipal solid waste is collected, have containers for at least three recyclable materials, such as, but not limited to, paper, glass, plastic, and metal, and transfer all recyclable materials collected to a recycler. 3. METHOD OF PAYMENT a. The COUNTY will annually distribute to. Hennepin County municipalities grant funds only to the extent the COUNTY receives SCORE funds from the State of Minnesota. SCORE funds are based on revenue received by the State of Minnesota from a sales tax on garbage collection and disposal fees. SCORE funds are subject to change based on actual revenue received by the State and funds allocated by.the legislature. The following formula will be utilized to determine the CITY's SCORE grant for each year: # of Households Served Curbside by CITY Total # of Households Served Curbside in COUNTY Total SCORE Revenue _ Grant Funds X Received by COUNTY Distributed to from State of Minnesota CITY b. Under no circumstances will the COUNTY's. distribution of grant funds exceed the CITY's proportion of SCORE fund revenues received by the COUNTY. C. The. initial grant fund payment will be forwarded after the County Board receives and approves this Agreement signed by an authorized official of the CITY. Provided the CITY is otherwise in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, future grant fund payments will be made after. 1 submittal by the CITY and approval by the COUNTY of the updated Grant Application as described in Section 2 and receipt by the COUNTY of SCORE funds from the State of Minnesota. d. Annual grant payments will be made to the CITY in two equal payments. One payment will be made after the COUNTY receives the Grant Application, which consists of the Re -TRAC report and a planning document. A second payment will 5 be made after the report has been approved, measurable progress toward the 2015 goal has been confirmed, and, if necessary, a Recycling Improvement Plan has been approved by the COUNTY. If the CITY meets the COUNTY requirements, both payments will be made during the same calendar year. 4. PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CITY shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the services. Nothing is intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of a partnership or a joint venture between the parties or as constituting CITY as the agent, representative, or employee of the COUNTY for any purpose. CITY is and shall remain an independent contractor for all services performed under this Agreement. CITY shall secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any personnel of CITY or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by CITY will have no contractual relationship with the COUNTY and will not be considered employees of the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall not be responsible for any claims that arise out of employment or alleged employment under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of any personnel, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees. CITY shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from all such claims irrespective of any determination of any. pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind from the COUNTY, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Re- employment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 6 INDEMNIFICATION CITY agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of CITY, a subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss by reason of the failure of CITY to perform any obligation under this Agreement. 7. INSURANCE A. With respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, CITY agrees at all times during the term of this Agreement, and beyond such term when so required, to have and keep in force the following insurance coverages, either under a self- insurance program or purchased insurance: 2 1:3 Limits 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with contractual liability coverage: General Aggregate $1,500,000 Personal and Advertising Injury 1,500,000 Each Occurrence — Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage 1,500,000 2. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation Statutory Employer's Liability. Bodily injury by: Accident —Each Accident 500,000 Disease— Policy Limit 500,000 Disease —Each Employee 500,000 An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability insurance coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above establishes minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of CITY to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with this Agreement. Upon written request, CITY shall promptly submit copies of insurance policies to the COUNTY. CITY shall not commence work until it has obtained required insurance and filed with the COUNTY, a properly executed Certificate of Insurance establishing compliance. The certificate(s) must name Hennepin County as the certificate holder and as an additional insured for the liability coverage(s) for all operations covered under the Agreement. If the certificate form contains a certificate holder notification provision, the certificate shall state that the insurer will endeavor to mail the COUNTY 30 day prior written notice in the event of cancellation of any described policies. If CITY receives notice of cancellation from an insurer, CITY shall fax or email a copy of the cancellation notice to the COUNTY within two business days. CITY shall furnish to the COUNTY updated certificates during the term of this Agreement as insurance policies expire. If CITY fails to furnish proof of insurance coverages, the COUNTY may withhold payments and /or pursue any other right or remedy allowed under the contract, law, equity, and/or statute. The COUNTY does not waive any rights or assume any obligations by not strictly enforcing the requirements set forth in this section. C. Duty to Notify.. CITY shall promptly notify the COUNTY of any claim, action, cause of action or litigation brought against CITY, its employees, officers, agents or subcontractors, which arises out of the services contained in this Agreement. CITY shall also notify the COUNTY whenever CITY has a reasonable basis for believing that CITY and/or its employees, officers, agents or subcontractors, and/or the COUNTY, might become the subject of a claim, action, cause of action, criminal arrest, criminal charge or litigation arising out of and/or related to the services contained in this Agreement. Failure to provide the notices required by this section is a material violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. DATA PRACTICES CITY, its officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and subcontractors shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (MGDPA), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality. CITY agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from any claims resulting from CITY's officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of such protected data, or other noncompliance with the requirements of this section. CITY agrees to promptly notify the COUNTY if it becomes aware of any potential claims, or facts giving rise to such claims, under the MGDPA. The terms of this section shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 9. RECORDS — AVAILABILITY /ACCESS Subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, CITY agrees that the COUNTY, the State Auditor, or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of CITY and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. CITY shall maintain these materials and allow access during the period of this Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 10. SUCCESSORS, SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENTS A. CITY binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the COUNTY for all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the contract documents. B. CITY shall not assign, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be performed, whether in whole or in part, nor assign any monies due or to become due to it without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. A consent to assign shall be subject to such conditions and provisions as the COUNTY may deem necessary, accomplished by execution of a form prepared by the COUNTY and signed by CITY, the assignee and the COUNTY. Permission to assign, however, shall under no circumstances relieve CITY of its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. C. CITY shall not subcontract this Agreement and/or the services to be performed, whether in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. Permission to subcontract, however, shall under no circumstances relieve CITY of its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. Further, CITY shall be fully responsible for the acts, omissions, and failure of its subcontractors in the performance of the specified contractual services, and of person(s) directly or indirectly employed by subcontractors. Contracts between CITY and each subcontractor shall require that the subcontractor's services be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified. CITY shall make contracts between CITY and subcontractors available upon request. 11. MERGER AND MODIFICATION A. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all. oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter.. All items that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. B. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties. 12: DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION A. If CITY fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, it shall be in default. Unless CITY's default is excused by the COUNTY, the COUNTY may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. Additionally, failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall be just cause for the COUNTY to delay payment until CITY's compliance. In the event of a decision to withhold payment, the COUNTY shall furnish prior written notice to CITY. B. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, CITY shall remain liable to the COUNTY for damages sustained by the COUNTY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by CITY. C. The above remedies shall be in addition to any other right or remedy available to the COUNTY under, this. Agreement, law, statute, rule, and/or equity.. D. The COUNTY's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to exercise anyright under: this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement: E. This Agreemeamay be canceled with or without cause by either party upon thirty (30) day written notice. F. Upon early termination or cancellation of this Agreement, the CITY shall itemize any and all grant funds expenditures up to the date of termination or cancellation and return such grant_funds not yet expended. 9 G. Upon written notice, COUNTY may immediately suspend or cancel this Agreement in the event any of the following occur: (i) COUNTY does not obtain anticipated funding from an outside source for this project; (ii) funding for this project from an outside source is withdrawn, frozen, shut -down, is otherwise made unavailable or COUNTY loses the outside funding for any other reason; or (iii) COUNTY determines, in its sole discretion, that funding is, or has become, insufficient. COUNTY is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. In the event COUNTY cancels this Agreement pursuant to the terms in this paragraph 13(G), COUNTY shall pay any amount due and payable prior to the notice of suspension or cancellation pursuant to the terms herein except that COUNTY shall not be obligated to pay any amount as or for penalties, early termination fees, charges, time and materials for services not then performed, costs, expenses or profits on work done. 13. SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or termination of this Agreement include but are not limited to: INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR; INDEMNIFICATION; INSURANCE; DATA PRACTICES; RECORDS - AVAILABILITY /ACCESS; DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION; PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE; and MINNESOTA LAW GOVERNS. 14. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION In order to coordinate the services of the CITY with the activities of the Department of Environmental Services so as to accomplish the purposes of this contract, Dave McNary, Solid Waste Division Manager, or his or her successor, shall manage this contract on behalf of the COUNTY and serve as liaison between the COUNTY and the CITY. 15. COMPLIANCE AND NON - DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION A. CITY shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations, rules and ordinances currently in force or later enacted. B. CITY shall comply with all applicable conditions of the specific referenced grant. 16. SUBCONTRACTOR PAYMENT As required by Minnesota Statutes Section 471.425, Subd. 4a, CITY shall pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of CITY's receipt of payment from the COUNTY for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. CITY shall pay interest of 1' /2 percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, CITY shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from a prime contractor must be awarded its costs and disbursements, including any attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 10 17. PAPER RECYCLING The COUNTY encourages CITY to develop and implement an office paper and newsprint recycling program. 18. NOTICES 19 20. 21. Any notice or demand which must be given, or made by a party under this Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing, and shall be sent registered or certified mail. Notices to the COUNTY shall be sent to the County Administrator with a copy .to the originating Department at the address given in the opening paragraph of the Agreement. Notice to CITY shall -be sent to the address stated in the opening paragraph of the Agreement: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CITY affirms that to the best of CITY'S knowledge, CITY's involvement in this Agreement does not result in a conflict of interest with any party or entity which may be affected by the terms of this Agreement. CITY agrees that, should any conflict or potential conflict of interest become known to CITY, CITY will immediately notify the COUNTY of the conflict or potential conflict, specifying the part of this Agreement giving rise to the conflict or potential conflict, and will advise the COUNTY whether CITY will or will not resign from the other engagement or representation. PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE CITY agrees, to the extent applicable, to abide by the current Hennepin County Communications Policy (available upon request). This obligation includes, but is not limited to, CITY not using the term "Hennepin County" or any derivative in, any promotional literature, advertisements of any type or form or client lists without the express prior written consent of a COUNTY Department Director or equivalent. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity. and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the. parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If. any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. 11 COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION Reviewed by the County Attorney's COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Office STATE OF MINNESOTA Assistant County Attorney Date: Recommended for Approval By: Director, Department of Environmental Services Date: Chair of Its County Board ATTEST: Deputy /Clerk of County Board By: Richard P. Johnson, County Administrator Date: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: CITY OF EDINA CITY warrants that the person who executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of CITY as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.* Signature: Name (Printed): Date: *CITY shall submit applicable documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. This documentation shall be submitted at the time CITY returns the Agreement to the COUNTY. Documentation is not required for a sole proprietorship. 12 o1Ie lk� 1180e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV. F. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -78 Designating No Parking on Tracy Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt attached Resolution No. 2012 -78 designating No Parking restrictions on Tracy Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Council authorized staff to prepare plans and specifications and take bids for the reconstruction of Tracy Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue at the March 6, 2012 Public Hearing. Tracy Avenue is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadway that requires a no parking resolution due to utilizing MSA funds to reconstruct the roadway. Currently, a resolution authorizing the required parking restrictions does not exist for this roadway. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2012 -78 G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PR0JECTS \C0NTRACTS \2012 \ENG 12 -5 Tracy Avenue \ADMIN \MISC \Item IV.F. Resolution No. 2012 -78 Designating No Parking on Tracy Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue.docx A RESOLUTIO'"O. 2012 -78 FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON TRACY AVENUE FROM VERNON AVENUE TO BENTON AVENUE (CSAH 158) WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the improvement of Tracy Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue (CSAH 158), State Aid Project No. 120 - 152 -013; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvements on Tracy Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City is prepared to proceed with the construction of said projects through the use of an advance from the Municipal State Aid Street Fund; and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain restrictions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby bans the parking of motor vehicles on the following portions of Tracy Avenue: 1. The west side of the street from 70' South of Benton Avenue (East Leg) to Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158). 2. On the east side of the roadway from 70' South of Benton Avenue (East Leg) to approximately 150' North of Benton Avenue (East Leg). 3. On the east side of the roadway from approximately 190' South of Grove Street (West Leg) to approximately 60' North of Grove Street (West Leg). 4. On the east side of the roadway from approximately 60' North and South of Grove Street (East Leg). 5. On the east side of the roadway from approximately 100' South of Warden Avenue (East Leg) and 60' North of Warden Avenue (East Leg). 6. On the east side of the roadway from approximately 50' South of Hawkes Drive and 110' North of Hawkes Drive. 7. On the east side of the roadway from approximately 50' South of Hawkes Terrace and 11 5' North of Hawkes Terrace. ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 6, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov a 952- 826 -0371 •. Fax 952 - 826 -0392 City Clerk REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No.. IV.G From: Jeff Long Chief Date: May 15th, 2012 Subject: Request for Purchase — One (1) 2013 Ford Police Interceptor Utility Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: 05/05/2012 08/31/201'2,1..; Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Nelson Auto Center 1. $26,671.82 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement $26,671.82 Contract #35460 Release A -175 5 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement of one marked police department vehicle per equipment replacement schedule Vehicle: 2013 Ford Police Interceptor Utility I <nignature The Recommended Bid is X within budget Police f_ O S �k�NZ REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER i I EXCE S OF To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV.H. From: Jeff Long Chief of Police i Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Request For Purchase — Furniture- Police Department Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: 4/30/2012 N/A Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Business Interiors by Staples 1. $30,000.00 M 2. Henricksen PSG 2. $26,336.30 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: j Henricksen PSG $26,336.30 GENERAL INFORMATION: The Police Department is requesting the purchase of furniture to accommodate the merger of the Health Department and Police Department. The Health Department will be! physically moving into the Police Department building. We are creating work stations that match the other cubicle areas of our building and will accommodate the work needs of the Health Departmen, employees. The lower bid is from the same company that supplied the original furniture in this building. An additional benefit of using this company is that they are able to recycle certain feces of our current furniture, thus enabling them to have the lowest quote. 1 I , ignat The Recommended Bid is X _ within budget no, O Cn 0 IN 0 roRPOPA a iBee REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. I. From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Bituminous Pathway Renovation — Rosland Park Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: May 6, 2012 June 6, 2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 1. $20,250.00 2. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 2. $24,888.00 3. Midwest Asphalt Corp. 3. $29,747.50 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $20,250.00 includes all taxes GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for the excavation and removal of existing blacktop and the installation of bituminous (as per Engineering Department specifications) at Rosland Park immediately adjacent to the Flow - Rider development at the Edina Aquatic Center. In accordance with bid specifications, the owner (City of Edina) is responsible for repairing and /or replacing the asphalt pathway next to the new Flow -Rider unit If approved by City Council, the work will be completed by June 7, 2012. John ios, Director This Recommended bid is within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department withi 1 bud et Wallin, Finance Director of N al it anager vt_ 1 . ,w9ZA,l Y Ow e O l� � • 18886 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV.J. From: Jennifer L. Bennerotte Communications & Technology Services Director Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Request for Purchase — City of Edina Wireless Networks Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: April 20, 2012 N/A Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. LOGIS $95,261.42 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: -- - -- LOGIS $95,261.42 GENERAL INFORMATION: While the City has made advances toward meeting the Vision 2020 objective of "Evaluat[ing] and efficiently employ[ing] technological advancements to provide City services," one area where we have not kept pace is wireless internet access. Free wireless internet access has become so commonplace that people visiting City Hall expect it. When their mobile devices cannot find our wireless signal, they ask what they need to access it. They are surprised when we say we don't offer wireless internet. This happens week in and week out, particularly when people come to public meetings or come to make presentations or sales pitches to staff members. Edina Public Schools now offers WiFi in all of its buildings. The Hennepin County libraries and service center in Edina offer free WiFi. Last summer, Communications staff called area cities to find out what they offer. At the time, Bloomington, Burnsville, Chanhassen, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Minneapolis, St. Louis Park and Woodbuy had WiFi at their City Halls. Since that time, Lakeville, Minnetonka and Richfield have added WiFi at their City Halls, too. Many of those cities have wireless networks that benefit other municipal properties. There are a few City of Edina facilities offering free WiFi. To meet the demands of their customers, some of our enterprise facilities have made their own provisions for wireless internet, contracting with private companies such as Comcast. Cost is approximately $100 per month, per facility. The Communications & Technology Services Department recently began working with LOGIS to develop a plan for a wireless project. The goal of the initial Edina wireless project is to establish WiFi coverage to be used by the public and City staff at Edina City Hall and the Edina Art Center, Braemar Arena, Braemar Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Park, Edinborou h Park and the Edina Senior Center. The wireless signal coverage will need to meet a "Premier V coverage, which is defined as coverage allowing access to the WiFi signal with 50 percent or greater signal strength. This coverage will encompass office areas, public areas and general meeting areas in each facility. The coverage will be much stronger and more reliable than that offered by Comcast. Four SSIDs, or wireless networks, would be created as part of the project. Each one would have its own unique purpose /function and IP address range: �I • EdinaOpen — This network will be used by the general public and be an "open" network with no encryption key or password. • EdinaCity — This network will be used by the City staff and will be a secured network that utilizes WPA2 AES Enterprise encryption. Devices connecting to this segment will have limited access to City resources that will be identified during implementation. • EdinaPolice — This network will be used by the public safety devices and will be a secured network that utilizes WPA2 AES Enterprise encryption. Devices connecting to this segment will have limited access to City resources that will be identified during implementation. • EdinalPT — This network will be dedicated for IP Telephony purposes. Although this is not utilized at this time, it will serve the function for future devices needing connectivity such as iPads, iPhones and wireless phones. The project is estimated to cost $95,261.42. The project budget was $110,000. Equipment would be purchased by LOGIS off of the state contract. LOGIS would oversee the project with assistance from the Communications & Technology Services staff. The costs related to each facility are estimated to be: • Edina City Hall -- $12,117.67 • Edina Art Center -- $5,813.52 • Braemar Arena -- $24,043.82 • Braemar Golf Course -- $5,845.52 • Centennial Lakes Park -- $3,247.26 • Edinborough Park -- $6,590.52 • Edina Senior Center -- $2,348.89 The cost of writing Braemar Arena is significantly higher than that of the other facilities because it is roughly the equivalent of three buildings and it has concrete walls and floors. Though the Communications & Technology Services Department recommends proceeding as planned and wiring all three rinks, the Arena project could be scaled back to include just the lobby, office area and West Arena, which would cut approximately $10,000 from the project to be used in 2012 to network another City facility or facilities. The wireless network could be expanded into the other rinks in future years. The remaining costs would be for WiFi management software, systems and labor. Annual software maintenance costs are estimated to be $7,463.20. The equipment has a five -year lifespan. If approved, work on the project would begin immediately, with work substantially complete in early July. The Communications & Technology Services Department will recommend expansion of the wireless networks to other facilities in 2013 and beyond. Communications & Technology Services Signature Department The Recommended Bid is c within budget not within _t o Wallin, Finance Director p� Scott al City Mani (j& `t� O I ■ ■■ ■0❑C ■■ ■ Local Government Information Systems Association The LOGIS Advantage Edina Open! Wireless Project 2012 of ji 4 t� 0 CERTIFIEDO Page 2 Project Definition The goal of the Edina wireless project is to establish WiFi coverage to be used by the public and city staff in the city facilities of Art Center, Braemer Arena, Braemar Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Park, City Hall, Edinborough Park, and Senior Center. The wireless signal coverage will need to meet a "Premier 1" coverage, which is defined as coverage allowing access to the WiFi signal with 50 percent or greater signal strength. This coverage will need to encompass office areas, public areas, and general meeting areas in each facility. Other goals that are defined in this project are: • WiFi coverage for city staff will need to require security and access to city resources. • Establish Internet filtering and best security practices. • Eliminate scattered current WiFi locations within the city facilities, effectively reducing costs, increasing management, standardizing access and improving connectivity. • Implement monitoring capabilities.to allow reporting on usages, outages, performance, etc. • Implement management software that will reduce IT labor related to changes and troubleshooting. • Establish an infrastructure that will allow future growth as the city expands to other facilities, number of connections, etc. Page 3 Configuration SSID Four SSIDs (SSID is a public name for a wireless network) will be created for the Edina Wireless project. Each one will have their own unique purpose /function and IP address range. These SSIDs are defined as follows: EdinaOpen — This network will be used by the general public and be an "open" network with no encryption key, or password. The IP address range that will be utilized for this network will be 10.14.0.0 255.255.0.0 and will be located on VLAN 850. Each facility utilizing this SSID will be assigned a subset of this segment which-will be identified later in this document under each facility. EdinaCity — This network will be used by the city staff and will be a secured network that utilizes WPA2 AES Enterprise encryption. The IP address range that will be utilized for this network segment will be subsets of the 10.13.0.0 255.255.0.0 IP address range and will be located on VLAN 851. Each facility utilizing this SSID will be assigned a subset of this segment which will be identified later in this document under each facility. Devices connecting to this segment will have limited access to city,resources which will be identified during implementation. EdinaPolice — This network will be used by the public safety devices and will be a secured network that utilizes WPA2 AES Enterprise encryption. The IP address range that will be utilized for this segment will be subsets of the 10.13.0.0 255.255.0.0 and will be located on VLAN852. Each facility utilizing this SSID will be assigned a subset of this segment which will be identified later in this document under each facility. Devices connecting to this segment will have limited access to city resources which will be identified during implementation. EdinalPT— This network will be dedicated for IP Telephony purposes. Although this is not utilized at this time, it will serve the function for future devices needing connectivity such as iPads, iPhone, wireless phones, etc. This network will be a secured network that utilizes WPA2 AES Enterprise encryption. The IP address range that will be utilized for this segment will be segments of the 10.13.0.0 255.255.0.0 and will be located on VLAN853. Each facility utilizing this SSID will be assigned a subset of this segment which will be identified later in this document under each facility. Devices connecting to this segment.will only have access to the Internet and the IP telephony system. Access Points This project will utilize_ the following two models of Cisco enterprise WiFi access points to provide coverage for the Edina wireless project: Cisco 3600 series is a CleanAirTM technology access point resulting in an enterprise class access point that is`designed to deliver up to three times more coverage which results in sustained reliable connections at higher speeds further from the access point than other competing solutions. This results in up to three times more availability of 450 Mbps rates. For more information on this access point, go to: http: / /www.cisco.com /en /US /prod/ collateral /wireless /ps5678/psl1983 /data sheet c78- 686782. html Cisco 3500 series is a CleanAirTm technology access point and is an enterprise class access point that is designed to be self - healing and self- optimizing. For more information on this access point, go to: Page 4 http: / /www.cisco.com /en /US/ prod / collateral /wireless /ps5678/ps10981 /data sheet c78- 594630. html Cisco® CleanAirTM technology uses silicon -level intelligence to create a spectrum - aware, self - healing, and self- optimizing wireless network that mitigates the impact of wireless interference generated from cordless phones, other WiFi access points, microwaves, etc. to offer performance protection for an organization's WiFi networks. 5 Facilities Art Center— The Art Center is located at 4701 West 64th Street in Edina. This facility has several challenges that need to be addressed from block walls, concrete floors, and multiple expansions and outdoor seating area. These, challenges will add difficulty in cabling and wireless penetration. To compensate, we increased the cost of, the cabling to allow extra time to cable the locations and increased the number of access points to 4 Cisco WiFi WAPs with one of the devices being a 3600 series to allow greater troubleshooting capabilities. In this configuration, we estimated a 40 foot radius per access point and the facility will'achieve a 90 percent premier 1 cell coverage throughout the facility. To achieve this coverage it will be is important that each of these devices is placed in the locations outlined on the facility blue print PDF. The following defines the SSID'configuration: EdinaOpen — The IP address range will be utilized for this network will be 10.14.0.0 with a subnet of 255.255.255.128 which will allow for 128 public connections to the wireless network. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.193 EdinaCity— The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.8.0 255.255.255.192 which will allow for 64 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.194 EdinaPolice — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.8.64 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.195 EdinalPT— The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.8.96 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT/PAT address of 156.142.79.196 Braemar Arena — The Braemar Ice Arena is located at 7501 Ikola Way in Edina. This facility is an open environment with little interference from other devices, however, the major challenges in the Ice Arena is the concrete walls/ floors and the distance between the access points and the wiring closet. To deal with these challenges we added a couple of wireless closets and additional switches to the configuration. To meet the coverage challenges and to supply premier coverage throughout all meeting areas and surrounding deck locations we went with the placement of twelve access points. In our configuration, we estimated a 50 foot radius per. access point in this facility and with this standard we can achieve all required coverage including several team rooms. To achieve this coverage it will be is important that each of these devices is placed in the locations outlined on the facility blue print PDF. The following defines the SSID configuration: EdinaOpen The IP address range will be utilized for this network will be 10.14.6.0 with a subnet of 255.255.254:0 which will allow for 512 public connections to the wireless network. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.197 EdinaCity — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.10.128. 255.255.255.192 which will allow for 64 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.198 Page 6 EdinaPolice — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.10.196 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.199 EdinalPT— The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.10.224 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.200 Braemar Golf Course — The Braemar Golf Course is located at 6364 John Harris Drive in Edina. This facility is an open environment with little interference from other devices. The goal of coverage is to supply premier coverage through all meeting areas and surrounding deck locations. Overall coverage can be accomplished in this facility with the well placement of three 3500 and one 3600 model WiFi access points. In our configuration, we estimated a 40 foot radius per access point in this facility and with this standard we can achieve all required coverage including locker rooms throughout the facility. To achieve this coverage it will be is important that each of these devices is placed in the locations outlined on the facility blue print PDF. The following defines the SSID configuration: EdinaOpen — The IP address range will be utilized for this network will be 10.14.3.0 with a subnet of 255.255.255.0 which will allow for 255 public connections to the wireless network. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.201 EdinaCity— The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.10.0 255.255.255.192 which will allow for 64 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.202 EdinaPolice — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.10.64 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.203 EdinalPT— The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.10.96 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.204 Centennial Lakes Park — Centennial Lakes Park is located at 7499 France Avenue South in Edina. This facility has several outside sitting areas that Edina would like to address with the WiFi coverage. We believe this can be accomplished with the well placement of two 3600 series WiFi access points. These access points are recommended since this area has interference from other nearby WiFi access points. The 3600 series access points with "Clean Air" technology will allow Edina to implement these into their environment without interfering with the other WiFi locations and also allow the ability to remotely configure and troubleshoot this environment. The city also utilizes Cisco 1300 series access points in a point to point configuration servicing the remote staff shop. The additional SSIDs will be placed on this wireless segment to service people located in this area. In our configuration, we estimated a 40 to 50 foot radius per access point and the facility will achieve a 90 percent premier 1 cell coverage throughout the facility. To achieve this coverage it will be is important that each of these devices is placed in the locations outlined on the facility blue print PDF. The following defines the SSID configuration: EdinaOpen — The IP address range will be utilized for this network will be 10.14.0.128 with a subnet of 255.255.255.128 which will allow for 128 public connections to the Page 7 wireless network. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.205 EdinaCity— The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.9.0 255.255.255.1.92 which will allow for 64 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.206 EdinaPolice —The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.8.128 255155.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the-firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.207 EdinalPT - The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.8.160 255.255.255.224 which will allow'for 32 wireless devices: This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.208 Edina City Hall —The Edina municipal center is located at 4801 West 50th Street in Edina. This facility is well constructed with an open environment with little interference from other devices. The goal of coverage is to supply premier coverage through all off the city hall and police facility. Overall coverage can be accomplished in this facility with the well placement of five 3500 and four 3600 model WiFi access points. In our configuration, we estimated a 50 foot radius per access point (with the exception of the booking area) in this facility and with this standard we can achieve all required coverage throughout the facility. To achieve this coverage it will be is important that each of these devices is placed in the locations outlined on the facility blue print PDF. The following defines the SSID configuration: EdinaOpen — The IP address range will be utilized for this network will be 10.14.4.0 with a subnet of 255.255.254.0 which will allow for 512 public. connections to the wireless network. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.209 EdinaCity— The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.11.0 255.255.255.0 which will allow for 255 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.210 EdinaPolice — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.12.0 255.255.255.128 which'will allow for 128 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.211 EdinalPT — The IP address range.that will be utilized'forthis network is 10.13.12.128 255.255.255.128'which will allow for 128 wireless-device s. This segment will translate out through the firewall with, the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79:212 Edinborough Park— Edinborough Park is located at 7700 York Ave South in Edina. This facility is saturated with WiFi interference from residents and other office areas around Edinborough Park and from initial review is one of the Edina facilities that will generate the most public usage of the EdinaOpen WiFi. Overall coverage can be accomplished in this facility with the well placement of four 3600 series WiFi access points. This model access point is recommended due to the interference from nearby business and residential access points. In our configuration, we estimated a 55 foot radius per access point in this facility since it is primarily an open area environment and with this standard we can achieve a 90 percent premier 1 cell coverage throughout the facility. To achieve this coverage it will be is important that each of these devices is placed in the locations outlined on the facility blue print PDF. Page 8 The following defines the SSID configuration: EdinaOpen — The IP address range will be utilized for this network will be 10.14.2.0 with a subnet of 255.255.255.0 which will allow for 255 public connections to the wireless network. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.213 EdinaCity — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.8.196 255.255.255.192 which will allow for 64 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.214 EdinaPolice — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.9.196 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.215 EdinalPT — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.9.224 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.216 Senior Center— The Senior Center is located at 5280 Grandview Square in Edina. This facility is an open office area that is perfect for WiFi coverage. Coverage can be accomplished with the well placement of two 3500 and one 3600 series WiFi access points. These access points are recommended since there is currently interference from the library access points. The 3500 and 3600 series access points have "Clean Air" technology will allow Edina to implement their environment without interfering with the library WiFi and also allow the city the ability to remotely configure and troubleshoot this environment. In our configuration, we estimated a 40 foot radius per access point and the facility will achieve a 90 percent premier 1 cell coverage throughout the facility. To achieve this coverage it will be is important that each of these devices is placed in the locations outlined on the facility blue print PDF. The following defines the SSID configuration: EdinaOpen — The IP address range will be utilized for this network will be 10.14.1.0 with a subnet of 255.255.255.0 which will allow for 255 public connections to the wireless network. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.217 EdinaCity— The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.9.64 255.255.255.192 which will allow for 64 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.218 EdinaPolice — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.9.128 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.219 EdinalPT — The IP address range that will be utilized for this network is 10.13.9.160 255.255.255.224 which will allow for 32 wireless devices. This segment will translate out through the firewall with the NAT /PAT address of 156.142.79.220 Page 9 Internet Access The city has the ability to route this WiFi traffic across their current LOGIS Internet connection or to supply a dedicated Internet connection through an outside organization such as CenturyLink, Comcast, Integra, etc. There are pros and cons to each but at this time we recommend incorporating this into your LOGIS Internet connection even though the additional traffic would potentially affect your LOGIS Internet charge, it would be definitely be less expensive than creating another Internet access through an outside organization. After the initial year, we will have additional history on usage, the Internet connectivity can be reviewed and if a decision at that time was made to change to separate Internet network providers, it could be done with minimal configuration changes. Maintenance LOGIS recommends the following for equipment maintenance: Wireless LAN Controller— The wireless LAN controller will need to be maintained under a 24 *7 Smartnet maintenance contract. These costs are outlined in the attached spreadsheet. 3600, 3500, 1400 Access Points — We do not recommend covering these devices under Cisco Smartnet maintenance since these access points are supported by Cisco under the equipment life time replacement program. LOGIS also maintains this equipment under our hot swap program. We stock this equipment since it can take up to 14 days to replace a device under the Cisco life time replacement program. Device and Network Infrastructure — LOGIS will support all of these devices in the same manner as we support the Edina network infrastructure. We will maintain the configuration backups and we are available 24 * 7 to resolve any issues. Labor will be billed on a time and material basis at the standard Network Services rates. Page 10 Management Wireless LAN Controller— LOGIS recommends the City of Edina purchase the Cisco 5508 with -an initial license of 50 access points to manage•their wireless infrastructure. Wireless LAN controllers assist IT staff in the management of.large scale WiFi deployments.: This recommended controller is an enterprise class controller that is designed to manage up to 500 Cisco access points. An initial 50 access point license can grow with the city by increments of 25 and will serve as the platform for management and control for many years. Noted features of the wireless controller are: • Mobility — allows devices to seamless transfer between access points and infrastructure. • Reliability— allows access point networks to self -heal and adjusts power in the wireless access points. • QOS — support for applications such as,telephony and video that need, guaranteed performance. • RF Security — detects WiFi interference and adjusts appropriately. • Wireless LAN intrusion prevention • Identity -based networking and security • Displays an "Acceptable Usage" page to the wireless users. • Network Admission Control • Simplified management - Ease of installation, upgrades, and maintenance. This controller will manage and control all access points in the City.of Edina. This is a highly reliable device and we initially we recommend a 24 *7 maintenance contract to protect against outages that could affect the WiFi network for an extended period of time. As the city becomes more dependent on the WiFi network, you can purchase a redundant 5508 controller that would provide N +1 redundancy., Forrmore information on this controller please see the web site at: hftp://www.cisco.com/en/US/broducts/psl.0315/indek.html Cisco Prime Network Control System — LOGIS recommends the City of Edina purchase Cisco Network Control System licenses to assist in the management of their wireless environment. This product allows problems to be identified immediately and provide the city with coverage maps of their environment. This product also allows for usage reports which would be valuable in determining usage by the facility and plan for future growth and management. Routing. Firewalling. NAT /PAT and Edina Open Filtering —We recommend setting up unique NAT (Network Address Translation) and PAT (Port Address Translation) translations for each segment and SSID. This would allow the city to easily troubleshoot and identify problems along with add /reduce capabilities. The recommended NAT /PAT is outlined under each facility. All routing will be controlled by the local facility core switch /router. These segments will be routed to the city hall facility's core router and transferred to the Internet through the existing city ASA 5520 firewall. This will reduce the need to purchase additional hardware and have one maintenance location. ` Page 11 LOGIS also recommends allowing VPN, http, https, SMTP, ftp, dns, mms, telnet, sftp, ssh, and pop3 protocols and filtering other protocols on the EdinaOpen wireless network. We recommend filtering protocols that would allow users to install gaming server software and other programs that could limit other WiFi users' usage. We would also recommend filtering of all http and https internet.for the WiR segments through Websense. Websense — LOGIS recommends the use of Websense to filter Internet access on the wireless networks. We would only recommend the initial purchase of 250 licenses and monitor the usage by guest users and add additional licenses as needed. Websense policies can be tailored around each SSID used by the city. We recommend the following settings: • Match the police Websense policy to the EdinaPolice SSID r • Match the Edina city global policy to the EdinaCity SSID. • Block the EdinalPT SSID from general Internet access. • Create a new policy to filter EdinaOpen wireless access per the policy of the city. Potential filtering we would recommend would be the elimination of pornography, gambling, and illegal sites. Page 12 Project sterns and Timeline The timeline to implement this phase of the EdinaOpen wireless - network and allow user access to the infrastructure is the first week of July. Many things can affect this schedule such as the approval process, equipment.delivery, cabling vendors, etc. To meet this timeline we would need to follow the tight project timeline listed below: Approval and Ordering Phase May 2nd — Receive approval for proceeding with the EdinaOpen wireless project from the City of Edina. May 4th — Contract with Structured. Networks to perform cabling and order hardware and software from Cisco. Preparation Phase Week of May 28th (when we would expect the delivery of WiFi devices and wireless controller) • Definition of Websense policies, agreement of protocols allowed, approval of acceptable usage page. • Identify exact cable locations of devices, demark rooms, and cabling of facilities begins. Implementation Phase Week of June 4th • Installation and configuration of the wireless controller 5508 • Update and download of firmware to all WAPs. • Begin configuration of VLANs and routing on city switches Week of June 11th through the week of June 18th • Completion of cabling • Continue installation of WAPs • Configuration of WAPS into NCS • Configuration of firewall access of SSIDNLANs • Rollout of WAPs. Testing and Rollout Phase Week of June 25th through July 6th • Testing of functionality, security, performance, etc. • NCS heat maps, adjust signal quality • Record configurations into CiscoWorks • Rollout to the public Pae-e 13 Evaluation and Tuning Phase Week of July 16th through the 27th • Perform heat map evaluations of each facility Performance tests and tuning in each facility Note: LOGIS will be assigning a project manager, creating a more detailed project plan based upon these highlights, and assign staff upon city project approval. Project Costs Project costs are detailed on the attached spreadsheet. These costs are separated per facility allowing the city to identify and possibly charge back costs to each profit center. It is important to note that these costs have a built -in 10 percent contingency outlined at the end of the spreadsheet and do not include sales tax and shipping. Note: To achieve these costs and equipment requirements we estimated based upon industry standards and best practices. Some facility costs may vary however the contingency is designed to offset these deviations. Recommendation It is our recommendation that the City of Edina seek approval from the city council to proceed with the purchase and implementation of the EdinaOpen wireless network as defined in this (and attached) documents. 1 w MI ,� Y 0 Senior Center Level 1 .>Ya � YI YI MX Ut i 1 1 1 I I 1 �Q'I X�! 4� ISIS R MUFS, IV� B�II.S HQ� Edina Centennial Lakes I � 1 NAFi 3500 _ ;II'__1 i 1 -�-- _ p AA i 4 (i � Edinborough f k Lower Level ;7) 5 4 2 _ FdL- _- N.%lL- -,l .1 = }'t._ -L.i�� - I -13N. 1. -_- . �- _ _ •._...__. } I i - n v I s10Vs Lu WFi .w y - -- r � � --• - 600 1 7 �� •, x. llu'� V1gF 3, i. r, VF 3600 cr �I q VFi II Ir 3500 �.�. AI „ r. _ ..s:.. -' ^- E..'.. -- - -- -- SHEET A; A' NO. { ��/ ` tf ._.._, . Tvl t `.._ wP` t - -•. - -. {. - „�.A -•_ .:: ' /� W'�=t r sw �iM �sw.4 A • MNR l Braemer Golf Upper Level i f � � Oall ar r WiR �• 3600 AP2 O k,.n,_ _f., ..... .. ...... .... Ail i I—I, 35W <.> AN i II� BOOR e—Ay!L , 6 •- �••.�•�•• •w w I�YC..3 c•-i ��..� nM wr.r�.s�uu 0 O c> s Braemar Golf __ _- - -- Clubhouse Edina, Minnesota Braemer Gulf Lower Level r - � II F q. 350 a El/ M ■ pry — ._,�° A _ I I v _ »I -•- - - - - - -•- -'` -- •- - -= - --- -- - -•- - --- - - - - - -- O C O tam 14 vc...a Z4 - 3Z 38 Gw �i..o c.+9oo FLOOR PLAN NCTES Q �.r= Q .o.arn oo.ua Qn.�o.a..a�a...m.�.. Qm_�r¢+.mw.ou use O•4..�' ro tV' cnM. I •w w�lO. Q, p � .....�.... pro, Braemar Golf Clubhouse 0 Ea ... - - - - - -- o .._.... ...... ' w ...... _:._ .. .. .. . ... .. ._ .. ...,. i- -s- n .'...fix. .... ■ .. ,A I I h:� ............ 415 r - � II F q. 350 a El/ M ■ pry — ._,�° A _ I I v _ »I -•- - - - - - -•- -'` -- •- - -= - --- -- - -•- - --- - - - - - -- O C O tam 14 vc...a Z4 - 3Z 38 Gw �i..o c.+9oo FLOOR PLAN NCTES Q �.r= Q .o.arn oo.ua Qn.�o.a..a�a...m.�.. Qm_�r¢+.mw.ou use O•4..�' ro tV' cnM. I •w w�lO. Q, p � .....�.... pro, Braemar Golf Clubhouse Art Center Main Level Art Gcnter Lower Level Municipal Center 1St Floor IViVJ OVEiA4 FIRST FLOOR PLAN BKV G R O U P Architec+ue Inferior Design Engineering Boorman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. 271 North Second Sheet Mnneapoff, MN 55101 telephone: 612.739.3152 Focskrde: 6t 2.339.6212 www.bkvgroup.com noowe kfirm CNy NaN L Poke Facw Eeno. M rin-sa o NID PACKAGE f2 I� OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN eew.c•� .ewiora oerz wm � c�ry� Al -1 O AW MGap Municipal Center 2nd Floor � r `F WV VNFi 1' 4 Ar 31A VAFi Fi _IK',.�. 2. 9 IBKV Architecture In1enor Desgn Engineering Boorman Kroos Vogel G(w wx. 222 North Second Sheet Minneapolis, MN 55101 Telephone: 612.3793752 Facsk+,ie: 612.339 . 6212 v .okvgroup.com Edina City Hall L Police Facility Edtrw. W-of. BID PACKAGE N2 ernm M ��e OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN our ,cw I ,yr ouwun O■O6flF t� Al .2 o a ■�o� Ice Arena Entrance i L ��,� •; c, .. ;.,... w :5�� rnry V lr:�Ir t / 'I tl �r... _ 'j' :.-' -� • F-� + 1� truce _ -1 i P? � -. gi'� t I--4--trl ad -• A- I t 7-` - v -` I I dr � ♦.wCt .I ' 5 a i® I - -r -t Ufa• � . .� � y ��S \ PLM -e .r•f �d \ @IM,-i�ENUWGED ra W VA \ 5 CB S C J \ \ \\ n CONCESSION ' ENLARGED South Ice Arena ) I .a I � -- i .I I Ia. M NFUE' a C AOPnpI NnC4 —f ' R rO lfg _ it • r. /._ � N\ � K YCOMC RIME 10 nD? nnr � mY' NR•Rnx� 7 a�`iv a n nlvP' E>•NIXf lousn¢R I.nl 10 tW m =Y � I' "' bl � IOIIPKI. ,cou[, •..w 71„111 � , �;. I �„ . � I � � Y ��- �u[ - v i�ggga rMOYn moo/AlP AP— -- -- woA �yl f a � u��� .y�n o.c. a arx•a`� — owwn >oa narna; ' 9P tcalltNViron. ,�. �EyrIP� u.rc cmwrt :c -u WiFI m¢aa 3500 Nwr nEr •m-v > NLr�ME. • - ?a w a w!oao •o rrcr n n<v nm E/S' ,IIOA I t rrn11c � r— u pow rwllaw. et nry ro I LEGEND r"E'wauutmallo�sscut � !4 +RIM.r ZLOW. ,n � f w_LEE EEEVNnOM 1c 1 EP *4 eD S NJ w/ s 1 ® \ elnomc ucna. sPOm noawnc Stave r�O C�iv,t I p DOOR NWdC � AL'EIIIM'E F LTN ARENA n I� � �DCaYC N a I le..J wj§ ,cn,NV.u. mrtll �oxs.oul •� H 9!E' ; O MEI'IOOM 'WE z E� a M� pE p p�V ' I 11r IIOOY MM��CP Cw Wl e�5. CNP M EIECigIC PNECwS' PAMCI YI o'rtscen. oOto:10ti'Dnwtcs 4 _ i I 1 �L coon+ ®+� Q `y u I _r 1 _I_ ------ -- +Wd Eity mN At s.con E.rs ru Z ED rc i '0 9EY y BR/6AET 1gIMEED ME E%IINGVS�'EN 11J R'ArMG wAr I Ir 1 1. 2.) I � 9rt tlnF � t EWE El1'IVDJSrEF AYC C1BhEI WTI II t - .• (Yl1 AER51f0 Y wlOeR • G.! Eo_ Mla ILL PI'rP CJ/rER) w I 4 DOwN5P0U' t I r� •i. � 0.S I A2.18 ut 14 -0 Eal BRAEMAR ARENAS PHASE 11 BRAEMAR PARK EDINA, MINNESOTA m QL) West Ice Arena b - - �`�; 3500 r_ 1. 1 r 1 .:,. 3600 d 1 Iry .w � _� - - !-- _Y_' -+ v . -� �� __ - T_A.`r1�,4: �� _, _:.. _ -. M-4• - _. / Y N4✓�1111 � Edin al Wireless CMEMO M`05' Extended List Extended Qty Part # Description List Price Price Discount Customer Price Price i 'Art Center - - 1 AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 36001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g/n 3 AIR- CAP35021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 35001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g /n 4 Cabling Category 5e or 6 cabling 10 Network Services Network Services labor for WiFi configuration, placement, infrastructure configuration, etc 1,760.00 Note: Switch has availaible ports and all cables will be within the 300 foot requirement of 440.00 the switch. However due to the contruclion of the Art Center, extra cost was required for 960.00 cablino to blend it into the enviornment and reach the data switch. Braemer Golf 960.00 1 AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 36001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11 a/g /n 3 AIR- CAP35021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 35001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g /n 4 Cabling Category 5e or 6 cabling 12 Network Services Network Services labor for WiFi configuration, placement, infrastructure configuration, etc 1,600.00 Note: Designed for a WiFi Placement in the ceilings outlined in the document. One WiFi 400.00 in the lower level combined with the penitralion of the WiFi devices in the upper floor will 1,152.00 cover all areas needed. Switch has availaible ports and all cables will be within the 300 96.00 foot reouirement of the switch. Bremer Ice Arena 25.00 4 AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 36001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g /n 8 AIR- CAP35021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 35001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g /n 2 Cisco 3560/08 Catalyst 3560 8 10/100 PoE + 1 SFP Standard Image 4 GLC -LH -SM Singlemode 1000 - base -LX/LH fiber optic SFP 2 Establish Wiring closet Locking cabinets, attaching RJ45 Patch panels, Fiber to primary location 12 Cabling Category 5e or 6 cabling 4 Fiber patch cables Singlemode LC to LC 17 Network Services Network Services labor for WiFi configuration, placement, infrastructure configuration, etc Note: Designed for a WiFi coverage is achieved through the placement of access points. Major challenge is all concrete walls and the distance of cable runs. This cabling distance exceeded 300 feet and required new wiring closets to be made. This is noted in the above AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 equipment layout. If possible we would try to eliminate one wiring close in the South 1,495.00 Arena. This could save $3800 off this facility. However we would not know until contracted 42.50% with SNS for cablina. Centennlal Lakes Park 1,495.00 1,295.00 440.00 96.00 1,495.00 1,295.00 400.00 96.00 1,495.00 42.50% 859.63 859.63 3,885.00 42.50% 744.63 2,233.89 1,760.00 0.00% 440.00 1,760.00 960.00 0.00% 96.00 960.00 1,495.00 42.50% 859.63 859.63 3,885.00 42.50% 744.63 2,233.89 1,600.00 0.00% 400.00 1,600.00 1,152.00 0.00% 96.00 1,152.00 1,495.00 5,980.00 42.50% 859.63 3,438.52 1,295.00 10,360.00 42.50% 744.63 5,957.04 802.13 1,604.26 0.00% 802.13 1,604.26 328.00 1,312.00 0.00% 328.00 1,312.00 2,600.00 5,200.00 0.00% 2,600.00 5,200.00 400.00 4,800.00 0.00% 400.00 4,800.00 25.00 100.00 0.00% 25.00 100.00 96.00 1,632.00 0.00% 96.00 1,632.00 2 AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 36001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.71a/g /n 1,495.00 2,990.00 42.50% 859.63 1,719.26 2 Cabling Category 5e or 6 cabling and mounting of brackets. 380.00 760.00 0.00% 380.00 760.00 8 Network Services Network Services labor for WiFi configuration, placement, infrastructure configuration, etc 96.00 768.00 0.00% 96.00 768.00 Note: Designed fora WiFi Placement in the ceiling of open area and one WiFi placement in the ceiling of the office. From this location penitralion should be achived into the sitting area along the water. The switch has available ports for the needed two WiFi devices. Municipal Center 4 AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 36001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g/n 1,495.00 5,980.00 42.50% 859.63 3,438.52 5 AIR- CAP35021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 3500i Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g/n 1,295.00 6,475.00 42.50% 744.63 3,723.15 Page I of 6 Senior Center 1 AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 2 AIR- CAP35021 -A -K9 0 Switch infrastructure 3 Cabling 12 Network Services Notes: With the majority of the area an open area arena the heat map would expand to 60 feet radius. We had to overlap due to the amount of coverage needed in the sealing areas and we moved to an all 3602 access point to compinsale for the interferance with the other WiFi devices in the offices. Also cabling is more expensive due to the areas for Dositionina. Access points are mounted at a 14' to 15' heiaht for best overall coveraoe. Cisco Aironet 3600i Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11 a/g /n 1,495.00 Cisco Aironet 35001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g/n 1,295.00 No changes are needed, 10 ports available. Category 5e or 6 cabling and mounting of brackets. Network Services labor for WiFi configuration, placement, infrastructure configuration, etc Notes: Designed for a WiFi premier radius of 40 feet. Access points recommended are a 1 3602 and two 3502 models due to potential conflict with library access points. WIFI Management software and systems ,Management Software 1,495.00 42.50% 859.63 i 859.63 2,590.00 42.50% 744.63 1,489.26 22,495.00 Edlna Wireless CosuSummary 42.50% 12,934.63 12,934.63 1 LIC- CT5508 -50 50 AP Base license - - 42.50% - Extended List 1 LIC- CT5508 -BASE Base Software License Extended v Qty Part # Description List Price Price Discount Customer Price Price 9 Cabling Category 5e or 6 cabling 380.00 3,420.00 0.00% 380.00 3,420.00 16 Network Services Network Services labor for WiFi configuration, placement, infrastructure configuration, etc 96.00 1,536.00 0.00% 96.00 1,536.00 - 1 CON - SNTP- CT0850 Note: Designed for a WiFi Placement in the ceilings outlined in the document. WiFi in the 2,880.00 2,880.00 20.00% 2,304.00 2,304.00 SSL Certificates lower police garage will be incorperated into the design and configuration. A high 1 Entrust SSL certificate for the 5508 web page 220.00 concentration of coverage will be around the council area and primary meeting areas to 0.00% 220.00 220.00 NCS Software (Used for the heat maps, troubleshooting performance, etc) handle the total number of potential users. Switches in city hall has availaible ports and all 1 L- NCS - 1.0-50 Cisco Prime NCS SOFTWARE AND License to manage 50 devices 5,295.00 5,295.00 42.50% 3,044.63 cable runs will be within the 300 foot requirement of the switch. Designing around a 1 CON- SAU- NCS150 SW APP SUPP + UPGR Cisco Prime NCS SOFTWARE AND Licence 1,799.00 1,799.00 20.00% 1,439.20 1,439.20 combination of 3500 and 3600 access points for manaaement and coveraoe. Edinborough Park_ . 4 AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 Cisco Aironet 3600i Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g/n 1,495.00 5,980.00 42.50% 859.63 3,438.52 4 Cabling Category 5e or 6 cabling 500.00 2,000.00 0.00% 500.00 2,000.00 12 Network Services Network Services labor for WiFi configuration, placement, infrastructure configuration, etc 96.00 1,152.00 0.00% 96.00 1,152.00 Senior Center 1 AIR- CAP36021 -A -K9 2 AIR- CAP35021 -A -K9 0 Switch infrastructure 3 Cabling 12 Network Services Notes: With the majority of the area an open area arena the heat map would expand to 60 feet radius. We had to overlap due to the amount of coverage needed in the sealing areas and we moved to an all 3602 access point to compinsale for the interferance with the other WiFi devices in the offices. Also cabling is more expensive due to the areas for Dositionina. Access points are mounted at a 14' to 15' heiaht for best overall coveraoe. Cisco Aironet 3600i Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11 a/g /n 1,495.00 Cisco Aironet 35001 Access Point Dual -band controller -based 802.11a/g/n 1,295.00 No changes are needed, 10 ports available. Category 5e or 6 cabling and mounting of brackets. Network Services labor for WiFi configuration, placement, infrastructure configuration, etc Notes: Designed for a WiFi premier radius of 40 feet. Access points recommended are a 1 3602 and two 3502 models due to potential conflict with library access points. WIFI Management software and systems ,Management Software 1,495.00 42.50% 859.63 i 859.63 2,590.00 42.50% 744.63 1,489.26 380.00 1,140.00 0.00% 380.00 96.00 1,152.00 0.00% 96.00 1,140.00 1,152.00 Wireless Controller (Used in the Management of WIFI Devices) 1 AIR- CT5508 -50-K9 Cisco 5508 Series Wireless Controller for up to 50 APs 22,495.00 22,495.00 42.50% 12,934.63 12,934.63 1 LIC- CT5508 -50 50 AP Base license - - 42.50% - - 1 LIC- CT5508 -BASE Base Software License 42.50% 1 SWC5500K9 -60 Cisco Unified Wireless Controller SW Release 6.0 42.50% - - 1 AIR -PWR- 5500 -AC Cisco 5500 Series Wireless Controller Redundant Power Supply 1,495.00 1,495.00 42.50% 859.63 859.63 2 AIR -PWR- CORD -NA AIR Line Cord North America - - 42.50% - - 1 CON - SNTP- CT0850 SMARTNET 24X7X4 5508 Series Controller 2,880.00 2,880.00 20.00% 2,304.00 2,304.00 SSL Certificates 1 Entrust SSL certificate for the 5508 web page 220.00 220.00 0.00% 220.00 220.00 NCS Software (Used for the heat maps, troubleshooting performance, etc) 1 L- NCS - 1.0-50 Cisco Prime NCS SOFTWARE AND License to manage 50 devices 5,295.00 5,295.00 42.50% 3,044.63 3,044.63 1 CON- SAU- NCS150 SW APP SUPP + UPGR Cisco Prime NCS SOFTWARE AND Licence 1,799.00 1,799.00 20.00% 1,439.20 1,439.20 Weg Edina Wireless Cost Summa►v Extended List Extended Qty Part # Description List Price Price Discount Customer Price Price 250 Websense licenses initial 14.00 3,500.00 0.00% 14.00 3,500.00 Total Purchase Contingency Grand Total. (Does not include sales tax.) Hardware is estimated on a 5 year replacement cycle. We estimate Edina budget in their Capital Replacement costs: Yearly hardware / Software Maintenance Pape 3 of 6 86,601.29 8,660.13 95,261.42 9,392.29 7,463.20 O, REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. K. From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Braemar Golf Dome Fabric & Artificial Turf Removal Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: May 8, 2012 July 8, 2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Yeadon 1. $30,000.00 2. Legacy Services Corp. 2. $41,700.00 3. Servpro 3. $87,182.00 . RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Yeadon $30,000.00 (plus any unexpected contaminated disposal fees, taxes or permits) GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for the removal and disposal of the existing Braemar Golf Dome membrane; removal of the existing cable harness and store at a location on site (exact location to be determined) because the cable harness may be needed for accurate measurement of the replacement; removal and disposal of the artificial turf; and power -wash (water only) the asphalt base surface after turf removal. This removal, disposal and clean -up project is covered by our insurance carrier Travelers. John Ke i , Director This Recommended bid is within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department not budge J n Wallin, Finance Director Iwe REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. L. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -80 Setting June 19, 2012 Hearing Date For Consideration of Vacation of Public Right -Of -Way, Portion of Natchez Avenue & West 41St Street ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2012 -80 calling the public hearing. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Jennifer & Mathias Samuel submitted a petition requesting the vacation of a portion of Natchez Avenue and West 41" Street MS 412.851 requires that the Council consider such a request at a public hearing. Staff has prepared the attached resolution accepting the petition, setting the hearing and directing the City Clerk to publish and mail the necessary hearing notice. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2012 -80 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -80 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined after receipt of the petition of the owner of the land affected thereby that the following described easement for public right -of -way purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provision of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851; PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF public right -of -way easement TO BE VACATED: That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 14, Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", and westerly of a line lying 50.00 feet westerly of the easterly right -of -way line of Monterey Avenue, formerly known as Oakdale Avenue, as dedicated in the plat of WILLIAM SCOTT'S ADDITION: together with that part of 415` Street West lying easterly of Natchez Avenue South and westerly of the southerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 12, said Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", all according to the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of a said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50' STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will meet on June 19, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for a scenic and open space easement to be vacated: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF public right -of -way easement TO BE VACATED: That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 14, Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA", and westerly of a line lying 50.00 feet westerly of the easterly right -of -way line of Monterey Avenue, formerly known as Oakdale Avenue, as dedicated in the plat of WILLIAM SCOTT'S ADDITION: together with that part of 4150 Street West lying easterly of Natchez Avenue South CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 and westerly of the southerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 12, said Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", all according to the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk Dated: May 15, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2012 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 City Clerk 01 le REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: VI.A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® ❑ 11 Action Discussion Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Public Hearing — Gallagher Drive and Nine Mile Creek Improvements, Imp. BA -382, Resolution No. 2012 -74. Regional Trail ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2012 -74, approving the proposed layout presented in the Feasibility Study and authorizing staff and consultant to pursue a variance from Municipal State Aid (MSA) Variance Committee for a variance on the horizontal curve of the roadway. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This project was petitioned by the adjoining property owner and identified in the 2011 -2015 Capital Improvement Plan as a 2011 project, but was not completed. This segment of roadway was also identified as the route for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. The Feasibility Study was submitted to the City Council at the May 1 City Council meeting. The project includes reducing the pavement width from 43 -feet wide to 28 -feet wide, adding a 9 -foot boulevard and a 10 -foot regional trail. A variance from MSA Standards will be required for the curve located just west of France Avenue; the next variance committee meeting is scheduled for late June. If successful at the variance committee, staff will work with Three Rivers Park District to draft an agreement to fund the trail segment; this agreement will be presented in early July. The remaining portion of the project will be funded through MSA funding and respective utility funds. Staff presented this project to the Edina Transportation Commission at the April 19 meeting, see attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2012 -74 Draft ETC Minutes of April 19, 2012 RESOLtlf id"(5. 2012 -74 REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM STANDARDS FOR STATE AID OPERATIONS GALLAGHER DRIVE — PARKLAWN AVENUE TO FRANCE AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Edina Engineer is hereby authorized to request a variance from the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of. Transportation, pursuant to Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations 8820.330 and 8820.9936, adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapters 161 and 162, as they apply to the proposed improvements of Gallagher Drive from Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue, State Aid Project 120 - 170 -020, located in Edina, Minnesota and Hennepin County; and 1. WHEREAS, the City of Edina has undertaken extensive study and a public and agencies involvement process. to insure that the design and operation of the roadway will provide opportunity for all modes of transportation including vehicular, bicycle and pedestrians in a safe environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina believes that the minimum design standards set forth by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820 as applicable to the proposed improvements of Gallagher Drive create an undue hardship; and WHEREAS, said hardship is further explained in- the attached supplementary letter from the City Engineer; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby respectfully submits a request for a variance to the Commissioner of Transportation for Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations, Chapter 8820.9936, Minimum Design Standards, Urban; New or Reconstruction Projects, as they apply to the proposed improvements of Gallagher Drive from Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue, so as to allow the following: 1. The proposed centerline radius of Gallagher Drive between station 8 +49 and station 9 +93 remains 120 - feet. 2. Vehicles continue to operate at the posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby indemnifies, saves and holds harmless the State, its agents and employees of.and from claims, demands, actions, or causes of action arising out of, or by reason of the granting of the variance. The Council further agrees to defend at its, sole cost and expense, any action of proceeding begun for asserting any claim of whatever character arising out of, or by any reason 'of the granting of the variance. Dated: May 15, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 1 , 20_. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard o Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN:gov • 952 - 826- 0371fa Fax 952 - 826 -0392 r May 9, 2012 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE City Engineer City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina MN 55439 -3037 Dear Wayne: RE: City of Edina Gallagher.Drive and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements — Supplemental Letter to Variance Resolution S.AY. 120 - 170 -020 SEH No. EDiNA 119130 14.00 As requested, this supplemental letter outlines hardships the City of Edina (City) will experience if Gallagher Drive is improved to Municipal State Aid (MSA) standards along its horizontal curve between stations 8+49 and 9 +93 shown in Figure 2 enclosed with this letter. However, before we describe the hardships, please keep in mind the following facts. 1. A speed limit of 30 miles per hour is posted today along Gallagher Drive between Parklawn and France Avenues. 2. Gallagher Drive's existing horizontal curve has a centerline radius of 120 feet between stations 8 +49 and 9 +93. 3. MSA standards.require. a minimum centerline radius of 300 feet for horizontal curves posted for speed limits of 30 miles per hour. 4. Three Rivers Park District and the City agree that Gallagher Drive between Parklawn and France Avenues is a corridor for the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (trail). 5. Recent investigations undertaken for this project with Three Rivers Park District staff identified that the trail best fits the east and south sides of Gallagher Drive. Because there are fewer points of conflict for bicyclists using the trail. Points of conflict are driveways, sidewalks, bus stops, etc. G. Adding the trail to the east and south sides of Gallagher Drive results in the proposed typical section shown in Figure 1 enclosed with this letter. Figure 2 also shows the hardships caused by applying a 300 -foot centerline radius to the proposed typical section along Gallagher Drive between stations 8 +49 and 9 +93. The bullet points below correspond to the hardships labeled in Figure 2. 1. Assuming Gallagher Drive's east and south proposed right-6f- way lble is at least 3 feet behind the trail to accommodate a 2 -foot wide clear zone from trail edge, the resulting 25 -foot building set -back line encroaches the northwest corner of the apartment building at 7333 Gallagher Drive. The northwest corner of the apartment building is shown in Photo 1. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer i www.sehinc.com l 952.912.2600 1 600.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax Mr. Wayne Houle, PE May 9, 2012 Page 2 Photo 1 Northwest Corner of Building 2. The landscaping shown in Photos 1 and 2 will be destroyed. This includes private light poles and sidewalks, about 10 trees (up to 12- inches in diameter) and numerous shrubs, bushes and mulch beds. Photo 2 3, Almost 5,000 square feet of property acquisition is necessary from 7333 Gallagher Drive. Please contact me with questions or comments at 952.912.2616 or tmuse a sehinc.com. Sincerely, kELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. %A:)� use, PE Manager Enclosures c: Paul Pasko, SEH (by e -mail only) Site Mason, SEH (by e-mail only) p: lid skdin311 1 9 1 1011•ben1116- meetl0i IS 12 public hearingLwppl Nr variance res 050912.docx R/W PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION R/W 5' 14' 14' o v, ' ``' 5' (n 10' o ``' w J EXISTING DRIVE VE LANE DRIVE LANE SWALE -'� TRAIL - m m WALK m > VARIES > m CROWN Zl 7 2% AND 2% AND VARIES AND VARIES -- - - - -- - - -- -- — - - - - -- �S Krs o Cl) m��t�:sr�:j. Or I MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS April 19, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Braden, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Schweiger, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Lal moving item 1A. Election of Chair APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULI Motion was made by member P Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULE Motion was made by member Th Motion carried. ELECTION OF CHAIR Member Thompson thanked outgoing. chair Janovy`,for servingtas: tie chair and nominated member Nelson. Member Nelson accepted the nominatidh -:� There,;. being no ;other nomination, member LaForce motioned to close the nomination and approve mernber�NelsoW6sAhe chair'and the,mobon was;.seconded by member Bass. All voted aye. Motion carried. ANSI r Chair Nelson thanked, outgoing chaKJanovy�for'H' -- service and opened up for election of vice - chair. Member Janovy nominated me �b�rBassanc�thisywas se�roded by meffi-b TThompson. Member Bass accepted the nomination. There r fr•��., being no other nomination, member Laforcejmotioned to close the nomination and approve member Bass as the vice chair and the motion was secondedlymember- Thompson. All voted aye. Motion carried. rsrr> . COMMUNITY COMMENT:— None. Andrew Kasid, 5401 Wooddale Avenue, a:. 2 year resident said he has seen the TLC Bike Blvd plan and requested consideration of parking nee1, s�of neighbo s and pedestrian safety. He asked that some parking be maintained on 54th ., between Wooddale and Kellogg , He sa dd�iey've had issues with drivers not stopping at the intersection at 54th and Wooddale and have had police pattoQfrom time to time and if parking is eliminated it would be a traffic concern for monitoring. Eileen Supple, 7332 West Shore Drive, said she is speaking as a resident and a member of the Edina Community Lutheran Church. (A letter was distributed to the ETC from the church.) She said they are excited about the bike path because they have a lot of bikers in the congregation, including a pastor who is a commuting cyclist but they are concerned with losing on- street parking that they have relied on for 64 years. She said they have avoided adding parking and does not want to add more surface that would cause run -off into the creek. She encouraged the ETC to look at share the road between France and Wooddale or to some other point to allow on- street parking. 1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS TLC Bike Boulevard Proiect Presentation Mr. Houle said Mr. Mike Anderson, traffic engineer, with Alliant Engineering will be giving the presentation and explaining staff's recommendation, and that Mr. Steve Clark with TLC is also in attendance and available to answer questions. Mr. Houle said an informational meeting was held on April 12. (A plan set was distributed to the ETC.) Mr. Anderson said the project limits have change since the February 16 meeting. He said the new Phase I project limits include Wooddale Avenue, 54th Street, Valley View Road and a southern portion of Wooddale Avenue connecting to W. 70th Street. The route will connect to bike facility on 44th Street, 70th Street and future bikeway that city of Minneapolis has planned for Zenith Avenue. Phase II was originally part of this grant but was eliminated due to construction cost and Phase I was extended down Wooddale Avenue over the pedestrian bridge aAk- connect to 70th Street via Southdale Road and Cornelia. Drive. The tentative schedule include City Council public hiWarigg on May 15, submittal to State Aid early May with construction starting end of August and completion, end of '-tem ber. Mr. Anderson said the objective of the project is to provi bicycling and improve safety for cyclists and, while the goal; or more, the challenge is meeting the specific design staA also adhering to the Minnesota Manual on Unif I ' from MnDOT; however, two Requests to Experiment are rE Road treatments are as follow: 54th Street from France Avenue to Zenith Avenui pavement message, share the lane roadway sign the stop signs at Beard and Drew Av_e,nue.s. 54th Street from Minnehaha Blvclto the south side and no parking Qri � mornings only. A variance would-- Removal of stop signs,;at jVliennehaha 54th from We with removal Wooddale Avenue froi Experiment because th Iley View Ro uld be using o- street bicyc� facility that will encourage increased shave dedicated' la 1es for roadway with vehicles of 2000 for the mostly StateAid roads governed by MnDOT and trol Devices (MMUTCD)He said no variance is required iced from the Federal H hwa_ Administration FHWA . �� � g rY ( ) re the road designated by a bike boulevard is circles and a recommendation to remove lation is%fflignated bike. lanes with on- street parking on ff is considering a variance to have parking on Sunday only 16 ft. of space and 19 ft. is required for parking. )js is currently being studied. rrower and the recommendation is dedicated bike lanes Street: recommendation is advisory lane and an FHWA Request to line instead of a solid line. Southern connection - Wood dal "Avenue�to 70`" Street: the route is Wooddale Avenue over the pedestrian bridge to th f',r, "" . $r� th Southdale Road to 68 Street to 'MnejiMrive to 70 Street:. Cyclists would be guided by marked signs only. Member La Force asked if the existing bridge�v o'uld remain in place. Mr. Houle said staff is working with MnDOT to replace the pedestrian bridge over TH62 in the near future, including the ramps, but in the meantime there is a u- channel to assist with getting bikes up and down the bridge. Member lyer said in this area it is a missed opportunity to combine with Safe Routes to School to connect to Cornelia.Elementary. Mr. Houle said the project ends here because of limited funds and that he is working with Alliant on a design plan for when additional funding becomes available. Member Janovy said this is a good solution given the available funding and a plan to finish in the 2 "d phase. Valley View Road from Wooddale Avenue to 62nd Street: project ends here with share the road and a 4 ft. wide green ainted sharrow because of the volume of traffic. The painted sharrow requires an FHWA Request to Experiment. 2 Valley View Road from 62 "d Street to TH62: removal of center turn lane and dedicated bike lane. The project terminates here. The traffic signal at France Avenue and 54th will have bike detection and marking where bikes are to stop and the signal light will change automatically. Route Marking — Wayfinding: destination signs and route markers will be installed behind the curb along the corridor. Member Janovy said they will need to have a discussion on wayfinding signs before they are established. Discussion Member Janovy asked about the kind of paint that will be used and she also asked if there is data to support that the turn lane is needed? In reference to the paint, Mr. Anderson said it is aboAtost. He said they will be looking for a paint that is durable but will not be looking at high end paint because it is exr�rfiental. Regarding the center left turn lane, he said Engineering staff did a study this past December and it was de&LiLrfi med that it was needed. Member Braden asked if the different section treatments wil are trying to be as consistent as possible and the treatmerff - +j Laforce does not think they are intuitive. Member Thom so' � E -. minimize confusion. He said this is similar to roundaboutsN to use them. He said it is a good compromise. Member Whitec drivers and a cyclist who was going from one treatment to an do you educate everyone. Member Janovy saidsFie Is what drivers to know that they are to yield to cyclist an' Yetlestri r {±� good job. He said there were some challenges and,,.they hayeal making conditions better or more cori sing and he sa d they a of the entire center lane but if thereY:iPba significan amount support of the project. Nj Member Bass said it is not perfecffos cyclist %ajivers but i r�f�• r,�r_ goal. She said it should�J�e;clear that cfitldren.;unde: certain Il be infuitive fo'r',feyclists /drivers. Mr. Anderson said they e similar to tf erones in city of Minneapolis. Member n said an educational component should be included to e drivers were against tre but have since learned how lsa'd she had f n incident thjs;evening with one of her bus other andfier bus driver did hbto see him. She asked how has'' .e�e� Wone and that it will take a lot of education for ans. MrClk said Edina and Mr. Anderson have done a poked attest . ractices. As a funder, he asked if they are re;r aking it etter. He said he has advocated for removal ofAur "ing thetrshould stay in place. He encouraged r�+sJ'v may, _ the City forward until they can achieve the ultimate ild not ride in the streets. Mr. Houle said a petition wasrsent in by adjbining property owners two years ago requesting resurfacing of Gallagher Drive. He said this project will begone jointly with the Three Rivers Park District to include their on- street bike trail. Mr. Toby Muse, project manager witli'$fFlr',esented the plan. Mr. Muse said the project boundary is Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue and that it is budgeted in the 2011 -15 Capital Improvement Plan. He said the road is 42 ft. with concrete curb and gutter, 5 ft. sidewalks, no parking, ten commercial driveway entrances, no pedestrian crossings, no roadway lighting and five Metro Transit bus stops. He said the plan is to do a mill and overlay, narrow the road to 28 ft. (requires a variance) to include a 9 ft. boulevard, a 10 ft. bike trail, no on- street parking, relocating one bus stop and marked pedestrian crossings. Total project cost is $472,000 and funding will be mostly State Aid ($346,000), Three Rivers Trail ($120,000) and the balance from the City's utility fund. An open house was held on March 27 and a public hearing is scheduled for May 15 with construction beginning early September and ending mid - November. 3 Discussion Onsite meetings took place with Metro Transit to determine proper placement of bus stops and meetings with the owners of Cedars of Edina regarding proper placement of pedestrian crossings because,their pool, tennis courts and other facilities are across the street in another complex and this was also taken into consideration with the bus, stop relocation. Staff was asked if bike parking was discussed and Mr. Muse said no. Mr. Houle they can include bike parking. Member lyer said the meeting was attended by six Parklawn residents but the project is on Gallagher. He asked if a sample size is considered to determine moving forward. Mr. Houle said all impacted residents are generally invited to the informational meeting but staff does not look for a sample size to move forward. Streetlighting was asked about. Ms. Kelly Grissman with Three Rivers DistriEfsaid they do not light any of their regional trails; however, the local agency can provide lighting if they so desiir�rer�,� ARM ember Janovy would like consideration for lighting, similar to the Promenade. Mr. Houle said because this is o.ril°,� g g, . f y of ill and overlay they cannot add lighting but they can install conduits for future lighting. Member Janovy asked if there will be a striped center lines e.,ause at their I tt %ETF meeting some members talked about having on- street bike lanes. Mr. Houle said the straPgha.,a'' ay would not be strped but the curve would be striped. �1f�r f �f, He said the trend is not to stripe lower volume roadways. No rees will not be impacte I %project. IanauUI IdLIUFI VptlonS wuming croup— Glectlon oT,,uo-cnair Member Janovy said the bylaws e. Pire""That this working,grou �chairrr by.a member of the ETC and member Whited has agreed to be the chair. MA U& fiber Janow��nominated member hite 'chair and the nomination was seconded by aye. Motion carried. Updates r rsf�4 � 1 {d Student Member �r ��1, None. Bike Edina Task Force = Minutes °;of'Marclf8 2012 Member Janovy said a bike rodeo Rcf e�dufed for this Saturday, April 21, 10 a.m. to noon, at Cornelia School, and there is new feature on the website, BikeEdina.org with new articles every couple of weeks. Member Whited enquired about expansion of bike lanes on W. 58th Street as noted in the minutes., Mr. .Houle will follow with an answer 'at the next meeting. Grandview Small Area Studv Chair Nelson said the City Council unanimously approved the framework on April 17. He said he is not sure how they will be moving forward but eventually it will come back to the ETC. 3nce Avenue Pedestrian Crossings Improvements Update .,r. Houle said they are designing the pedestrian crossings that were approved by City Council. He said the City Council discussed the need to have an urban landscape architect and WSB did a search of the area, including Wisconsin, and 4 LHB, Inc. seem to be a good fit. He said because of the size of the project it would be difficult to attract a national firm. He requested feedback from the ETC regarding the landscape architect and also stakeholders meetings which he would like to schedule in conjunction with the ETC meetings. Member Janovy asked if landscaping is included in WSB's contract and Mr. Houle said yes. She said the City Council wants a strong urban design but they did not say what they were looking for and she does not know what this company can do. She said further that it makes her uncomfortable when a contract goes to individuals involved with the City. Mr. Houle asked if they would like to set up a working group for this project. Member Janovy said she likes the idea of the entire ETC being involved in the stakeholders meetings and also like a couple being part of the design group. Member Braden volunteered to be part of the design group. Living Streets Working Group Update Member Thompson, chair of the working group gave a present where it is today. He said discussions started in early 2011, and in it. A working group was created that has met twice (Dec 8 a development workshop. He said Living Streets creates .a viJss* aesthetics, green sustainability, solutions to traffic concern�,et conduct policy review, identify stakeholders, etc., CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS —None Member Whited asked how to share articles She volunteered to help with developing an e Member lyer said he would like t ,berpa °r.'t of the Safe Member Braden noted that tWTTG_has done;ra'lot in the ition on�fijving Streets from its inception in Edina to MaPothe '.t &,City Council adopted a resolution supporting Pr yfrf f, ar30and on February 15 they held a policy futufe :that includes safe walking, education, Continuing, W.' Barr Engineering was selected to She was told, to email them to Mr. Houle for distribution. n,for the pubflc,fqr the Bike Blvd project. Member Janovy said thePBETF would'- .lo've.tor'tia�ie volunteers to?help with education and this will probably be the same ✓f�f�r,'?. 9yff��. , for Living Streets.,Sh�sc.Eda is partJJoBoomirigtbhHealtl; %s Safe Routes to School and they've just had their first meeting and cQ use more representation;frpm citizens'and;ETC and suggested possibly setting up a working group. To echo what mem1wUraden said, s e sad the Co ncil has been very engaged. Chair Nelson said year. Member Thompson echoed -rrrPr oint workiri ession den said. with the City Council to review the ETC's priorities for the Member Bass thanked staff for their'V er'sistence in pursuing the France Avenue scope change. She said it is a huge win for residents. She thanked outgoing chairJanovy for her service and welcomed new chair Nelson. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Houle thanked the Mayor, City Manager, and member Janovy for their involvement with the France Avenue scope change. A group photo has been requested, probably to be posted to the website, and there is a release form for everyone to sign. A copy of the final bylaws was handed out. 5 ADJOURNMENT Member La Force motioned to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 p.m. and the motion was seconded by member Janovy. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet 6 TRANSPORTATION Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINEI Attendance Recorded ION MEMBER'S LINE) COMMISSION Type 1" under the month on the meetings' line. NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 4 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 (enter ter da to (enter date) 4 100% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 3 75% Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2013 1 1 1 3 75% lyer, Surya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 3 100% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1' 4 100% LaForce, Tom 2/112015 1 1 1 3 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 4 100% Schweiger, Steven student 1 1 1 3 75% Thompson, Michael 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 4 100% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 -_ ILL 3 100% VACANT student 0 0% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINEI Attendance Recorded ION MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type 1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type 1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: ;L&- I a[ie �cOgea°s �� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: VI.B. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® ❑ Action Discussion Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Public Hearing — Bike Boulevard 2012 -75. Improvement A -238, Resolution No. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2012 -75, approving the proposed layout and no parking requirements for the Bike Boulevard Improvements, Improvement No. A -238. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: As you will recall the City of Edina was granted $250,000 for a bike boulevard project through the Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) grant program. The City Council did adopt Resolution No. 2011 -70 supporting the project. Staff along with our consultant, Alliant Engineering has been working very diligently with MNDOT to gain approvals of some newer pavement markings for this project. Staff and consultant have hosted two public informational meetings; the first meeting on October 6, 2011 and the second on April 12, 2012 to share the proposed design, see attached map indicating the mailing area. Staff and consultant also presented the project to the Edina Transportation Commission on April 19, 2012. The engineering fees did not allow for a conceptual type set of plans, therefore the design plans are included. The elimination of on- street parking is proposed in selected areas, therefore requiring this request be part of the resolution. Attached is a TLC acceptable option for West 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to Halifax Avenue (see Exhibit 3 of the plan set). Staff is recommending the option as shown in the attached updated plan set for the project. Correspondences received regarding this project are attached, along with the April 19 draft Edina Transportation Commission meeting minutes when this project was presented. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2012 -75 Phase 1 Project Overview Updated Plans for Bike Boulevard Improvements, Improvement No. A -238 Exhibit 3 — West 54th Street, Minnehaha Boulevard to Halifax Avenue Draft ETC Minutes of April 19, 2012 Resolution No. 2011 -70 Map of mailing area for informational meetings and public hearing notices. Correspondences RESOLUTION -NO. 2012 -75 APPROVING PROPOSED BIKE BLVD LAYOUT AND PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON 54th STREET FROM WOODDALE AVENUE TO FRANCE AVENUE WHEREAS, on June 7, 201. 1, the City Council of the City of Edina, adopted a resolution supporting this project; and WHEREAS, the City of,Edina has planned,the addition of bicycle lanes on 54th Street from Wooddale Avenue to France Avenue, State Project No.'-120- 091 -002; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Federal Aid Funds,on the improvements on 54th Street; and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain restrictions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby approves the proposed Bike Blvd layout and bans the parking of motor vehicles on the following portions of 54th Street: 1. The north side of the roadway from the easterly limits of Wooddale Avenue (east leg) to the westerly limits of France Avenue (west leg). 2. On the south side of the roadway from the easterly limits of Wooddale Avenue (east leg) to approximately the westerly limits of Minnehaha Boulevard (west leg) ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 2012. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of -120 City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Edina Bicycle Blvd — Phase 1 Project Overview Project Goal: In 2008, the City of Edina Bicycle Transportation Plan vision was adopted; which is, to provide abicycle- friendly.._community by improving conditions for cycling through reducing hazards, by developing the City's bicycle transportation infrastructure, ancIty inviting residents, workers and visitors of the community ,to include this safe, comfortable and convenient mode of transportation into their lives. The 54th Street, Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road corridors are identified in the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan as primary bicycle routes within the City. In recognition ,of the selected corridors regional• connectivity, and significance to the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan, Edina .was awarded federal funds (Non- MotorizedTransportation Pilot Program) to implement an on- street bicycle facility along these corridors. The design of these bicycle facilities must improve conditions for cycling and serve to encourage increased bicycling. The, project has been reviewed in accordance with best practices for on- street bicycle 'design and the governing Minnesota State Aid design standards. Recommendations for each. roadway segment areAiscussed below. 54th Street — FranceAvenue to Zenith Avenue (Sheets 35 =36) Vehicle Traffic: <80.0 vehicles per day Constraint: None. Low traffic volume,and non -MSA road: Recommendation: Share the Road. • Supplement share the road signing with large "Bike .Blvd" pavement message at key locations. Message is consistent with Minneapolis design for residential bicycle boulevard streets, as this segment will connect to future share the road design on Zenith Avenue S. • Add residential traffic circle at Drew Avenue and Beard Avenue. Traffic circle will be landscaped (maintained by neighbors or Engineering). Traffic circles are designed for 10 mph vehicle speed. • Remove eastbound /westbound stop signs at Drew Avenue and Beard Avenue and replace with a 4 -way Yield condition. Alternative Design: None 54th Street — Minnehaha Avenue to France Avenue (Sheets 34 -35) Vehicle Traffic: 2,700 vehicles per day Constraint: Share the road design is not expected to provide the necessary level of comfort or preferred designation of space to. encourage bicycle riding on- street. Dedicated bicycle lanes do, but require 1 -side on- street parking removal due to MSA minimum street width requirement. Recommendation: Dedicated Bicycle Lanes. • Provide dedicated bicycle lanes in both eastbound and westbound directions. 1 • Remove center yellow dashed line. • Stop westbound bicycle lane at top of steep portion of hill (across from Community Church) and allow bicycles to use full lane. • Maintain on- street parking on south side of 54th Street. • Remove on- street parking on north side of 50 Street. Removes approximately 20 legal on- street parking stalls between Minnehaha Avenue and Halifax Avenue. Removes approximately 14 legal on- street parking stalls between Halifax Avenue and France Avenue. (34 total on- street parking spaces). Parking will be maintained on the south side of 54th Street, and sufficient on- street parking (although less convenient) exists along Halifax Avenue to support parking loss, if and when the south side on- street parking is full. Alternative Design: The alternative to dedicated bicycle lanes (in the event parking on north side of 54th Street is not removed), is the advisory bike lane design (similar to the design for Wooddale Avenue). 54th Street — Wooddale Avenue to Minnehaha Avenue (Sheets 27 and 33) Vehicle Traffic: 2,700 vehicles per day Constraint: Share the road design is not expected to provide the necessary level of comfort or preferred designation. of space to encourage bicycle riding on- street. Dedicated bicycle lanes do, but require on- street parking removal on both sides of street due to MSA minimum street width requirement. Recommendation: Dedicated Bicycle Lanes. • Provide dedicated bicycle lanes in both'eastbound and westbound directions. • Stop eastbound bicycle lane at top of steep portion of hill (Brookview Avenue) and allow bicycles to use full lane. • Remove on- street parking on both north side and south side of 54th Street. The on- street parking along this segment are the side yards to adjacent property owners. The homes along this segment have driveways, plus front yard parking along north /south streets. . Alternative Design: The alternative. to dedicated bicycle lanes is the advisory bike lane design (similar to the design for Wooddale Avenue). Under the advisory lane concept, on- street parking would need to be removed from one side of 54th, Street. Wooddale Avenue — Valley View Road to West 50th Street (Sheets 22 to 29) Vehicle Traffic: 3,300 to 4,500 vehicles per day Constraint: Share. the road design will not provide the necessary level of comfort or preferred designation of space to encourage bicycle riding on- street. Dedicated bicycle lanes do, but require on- street parking removal on both sides of street due to MSA minimum street width requirement. Removal 2 of on- street parking is not considered due to long blocks, direct property frontage and the removal would render the entire street without any on- street parking. Recommendation: Advisory Bike Lane. • Allows on- street parking to be maintained on the east side of Wooddale Avenue. • The advisory bike• lane concept will remove, the existing yellow dashed centerline and will provide a designated bicycle space that provides a continuous longitudinal lane marking. The advisory bike. lane is not quite a fully dedicated bicycle lane, since motorists'are permitted to drive in the bicycle lane,area to pass on- coming motorists if needed. • The inside longitudinal white bike lane line will be dashed, as opposed.to solid. • The dashed longitudinal line (much like a dashed white lane line) sends a permissive message to the motorists they should operate next to the line, and are'allowed to enter or cross the bicycle lane as necessary. • The advisory bike lane is experimental (due to dashed longitudinal bike lane line instead of solid). Engineering. is working with FHWA to receive permission to install and expect this request to be granted. (Similar design located on 10 Street E in Minneapolis). Alternative Design: The alternative to the advisory bike lane design would be a share the road concept. A share the road concept would provide a shared, lane marking at 200 foot intervals and would be located in the same spot as the proposed advisory lane bicycle: symbols. It should be noted, the motorist- motorist and motorist- bicycle interaction is nearly identical between share the road and advisory lane designs (where conflict exists between presence of both cyclist and /or' on- coming motorists); except, the. advisory lane design is far superior in providing a continuous reference to both the bicyclist and motorist the intended position in the roadway space, thus resulting in greater comfort for cyclists to be on the roadway. Valley View Road—' Wooddale Avenue to West 62nd Street (Sheets 22 and 30) Vehicle Traffic: 6,700 vehicles per day Constraint: Center left turn lane is needed. Dedicated bicycle lanes are preferred, but cannot fit within the existing street space to. both meet -the MSA. minimum street width requirements and maintain the center left turn lane. Shared lane markings: by themselves are not-expected to provide sufficient bicycle designation to encourage on- street cycling. Recommendation: Shared lane marking with a continuous green background. • Maintain center left turn lane • Provide a 4 foot wide, continuous green bicycle lane (located next to curb) along with the shared lane markings. The green background is consistent with bicycle facilities throughout the country and within Minneapolis. 3 • The green lane marking is experimental (due to use of solid color green). Engineering is working with FHWA to receive permission to install and expect this request to be granted. (Similar design throughout Minneapolis, particularly Hennepin Avenue in Downtown Minneapolis). Alternative Design: Green background could be omitted. In this case, an enhanced shared lane markings at more frequent intervals (100 feet) would be provided. The shared lane marking would be supplemented with a longitudinal white dash at the location of marking (also an FHWA request to experiment). Valley View Road — West 62nd Street to Hwy 62 (Sheets 30 to 32) Vehicle Traffic: 6,700 vehicles per day Constraint: Dedicated bicycle lanes are preferred, but cannot fit within the existing street space to both meet the MSA minimum street width requirements and maintain the center left turn lane. Shared lane markings by themselves are not expected to provide sufficient bicycle designation to encourage on- street cycling. Recommendation: Dedicated Bike Lanes. • Remove center left turn lane • Maintain existing on- street parking along northeast side. • Provide dedicated bicycle lanes. The bike lanes will begin at the end of the green pavement markings provided in the Wooddale to 62nd Street segment. Alternative Design: Maintain center left turn lane. This would then require shared lane markings. Due to the overall segment length, the continuous green background would be cost prohibited. In this case, an enhanced shared lane marking design at more frequent intervals (100 feet) would be considered. Southern Connection — Valley View Road to West 70th Street (Sheets 16 to 22) Vehicle Traffic: <500 vehicles per day Constraint: None. Low traffic volume-and non -MS A road. Recommendation: Share the Road • Provide a signed bicycle route via Wooddale Avenue to use the existing pedestrian bridge over Hwy 62 in access of Cornelia Park. The bike route would follow the frontage road, Southdale Road to West 68th Street, W 68th Street to Cornelia Drive and Cornelia Drive to West 70th Street. • No change in pavement markings • Provide route marker and way - finding signs to designate the route. Alternative Design: None 4 m a ""' MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0 CITY OF EDINA y O EDINA BIKE BLVD - PHASE I CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR: BIKE LANE IMPROVEMENTS, SIGNALS, SIGNING AN-D PAVEMENT MARKING LOCATED ON:. WOODDALE AVE S BETWEEN W 50TH ST AND TH 62 W 54TH ST BETWEEN WOODDALE AVE S' AND ZENITH AVE S VALLEY VIEW RD BETWEEN WOODDALE AVE S AND W 64TH ST SOUTHDALE RD BETWEEN TH 62 AND W 68TH ST CORNELIA DR BETWEEN W 68TH ST AND W 70TH ST WOODDALEAVE W 5OT'H STTO VALLCY vww RD STATE PROJ. NO. 120 -091 -002 (GROSSLENGTH= 766(') O ((ART=3300 -4500) (2009)) Z in W 54TH ST 0 CATCH BASIN N WOODDA_ LE'AVETO FRANCE AVE, 0 BEE HIVE CATCH . BASIN q;140% . (GROSS LENGTH--2630') ® STORM MH; DRAINAGE _ R 21 19_ (ADT =2600(2011)) T SUMP DRAIN CLEAN OUT 0 SANITARY MH siALONF.YAVE C. Q G O LAaIEN n W 54TH ST so SANITARY CLEAN OUT o QoolmrD Q z FRANCE AVE TOZCNITHAVE HYDRANT O INTF.RLACHEmw) `; (GROSS LENGTH = 1970') oo. WATER VALVE o eU 4 `° ((AOT=800)(1011)) 0 WATER VALVE MH o QOa E�iY.E "nvs IAL a `' o° STOP BOX' p 4� ° ' " QM 'vL� `- WOODDALE AVE 1°v POST INDICATOR VALVE D ti "a 4 VALLEY VIL-WRDTOHWY,62 m ELECTRIC MH = a p �� o J (GR0.5SLENGTH =16io) UTILITY POLE z QO �Zr — ((ADr-- c500j(2011)) E LIGHT POLE �_ o o �� 3;: P 0 UTILITY POLE W /LIGHT I.'' *% b 2 c ° VALLEY VIEW RD \( GUY WIRE `I D " *� v 6FC SOMA IE\VLAC ° WOODDAORAVETOTH62 d GUY POLE a� o F a \Y. IH (GROSS I FNGTH 2470') r' g A. DEN AVE > _ ro 'y ((ADT =6700) (2005)) � GROUND LIGHT � °'� P a " . 4 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL E\ SOUTHDALE RD, 0D HAND HOLE 4 % �VD ��ErNgn TH 62 TO 1V 63TI1 ST 10 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL (GROSS LENGTH =322V) TELEPHONE MH o E ((ADTx.500j (2011)) la TELEVISION PEDESTAL p ° W 68TH ST c GAS VALVE "I' ol, � j ° %va t `A `eeeTH SOUTHDAL6 RD TO CORNELIA DR e MAIL BOX 00o RETAINING WALL (GROSS LENGTH 350) ((ADT 5p 0 0) CHAIN LINK FENCE v 011)) --0-o- jfo'� °u„ _ :4 \ \•NTH �-� - WOOD FENCE v g CORNELIA DR ^ SILT FENCE Q W 68TH ST TO W 70TII ST '�. SAWCUT o 4s, o o 1 Z (GROSS LENGTH= 1840) >>— STORM SEWER I ((ADT 500)(2011)) — > — SUMP DRAIN a ° o{�' u ° N — I — WATER LINE _ MADIAR DEWEYIIILLRf7 r ARlHA- ;.+` LAI. • .A\\w, \• O TOTAL GROSS LENGTH. — > — SANITARY SEWER GROSS LI NG'1'11= 21810• —G— GAS LINE 9RAE \tAR GOLF [T/URSP �yy %m GROSST.F.NGTH =x.131 MILES = T — .TELEPHONE UG LINE "TILE EbNn \null —P— ELECTRIC UG LINE T"`'' _ d%wild IN. WAL _ - OH- OVERHEAD HWY' 494 R 21- W I R 24 W PROPOSED= BOLD \SOLID I DATE I SHEET NO. 1 APPROVED BY I THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D, THIS. QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -02. ENTITLED "STANDARD GUDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA ". PROJECT LOCATION SCALES (IN FEET). COUNTY: HENNEPIN INDEX. MAP 1' °4000' DIVISION: METRO PLAN 1 %40' +o SIGNING AND MARKING PLAN FED. PROJ. NO. NMTP 201.2 (079)_ GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS THE 2005 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND THE SPECIFICATIONS.FOR CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY OF EDINA SHALL GOVERN THIS PROJECT NOTE: ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM. AND BE INSTALLED.IN.ACCOROANCE TO THE "MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ". (MN MUTCD)_AND PART VI, "FIELD MANUAL FOR'TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS." INDEX SHEET NO DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 3 TYPICAL SECTIONS AND TRAFFIC CIRCLE DETAIL 4 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 5 -7 TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS. 8 9 CONSTRUCTION PLAN 10 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1142 TABULATIONS 13 -14 PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS 15-35 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN 3638 SIGN DETAILS' 3940 TYPE C &. D SIGN PANELS 41 SIGNAL DETAIL. 42 INTERSECTION SIGNAL LAYOUT THIS PLAN CONTAINS 42 SHEETS APPROVED FOR STATE & FEDERAL AID FUNDING; STATE AID ENGINEER DATE STATE AID ENGINEER-REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DATE FEDERAL AID RULESMICY: APPROVED'. CRY OF EDINA CITY ENGINEER DATE APPROVED: MWIVEAPOUS CITY MWEER OR DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER DATE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE F MINNESOTA 42828 OVABLj2 MICHAEL R ANDERSON L.IC.NO. DATE CITY OF EDINA CONTRACT NO, X STATE PROJ.. .NO: 120 -091 -002 STET 1 or 42 0 G 0 °o 0 i 00 CL O i N W 9 5 S ni NO NOV .,x 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 1 2571.505 I DEC SYSTEM H 1 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES TAB. SHEET NO. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNITS TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY SP 120-0.91 -002 1 12 2102.501 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SO FT 180.00 1 12 2102.502 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LIN FT 9826.00 230.00 TON 12. 26.00: 4" DB SOL® LINE YELLOW- POLYPREF GRIN . H 2506.522= ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1 SQYD 110.00 E 11 2104.509 . REMOVE SIGN TYPE C : EACH 4 PAVEMENTMARKING SPECIAL 2 110.00 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) (1). LW FT 170.00 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 1 2571.505 I DEC SYSTEM H 1 12 .501 COMMON EXCAVAI .507 SUBGRADE EXCAV .607 TOPSOILBORROW; 12 1 2582.502 1 .601. STREETSWEEPER 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 1 2571.505 I DEC SYSTEM H 1 12 ct-- 4" SOLID LINE.WHITE- POLYPREF (GRIN) A LU TU, 2046.00 TS.UU 12 1 2582.502 1 2355.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, FOR TACK COAT LIN FT GALLON H 10.00 2582.502 1 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW -POLY PREF GRIN 2360.50T TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX 5 L . 230.00 TON 12. 26.00: 4" DB SOL® LINE YELLOW- POLYPREF GRIN . H 2506.522= ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING H' EACH 2582.618. 4' SOFT 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8624 12 LIN FT . PAVEMENTMARKING SPECIAL 2 110.00 SO FT 16.33 H 12' 2582.618 PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 3 SO FT 1 11 11 11 11 12 11 11 1 2571.505 I DEC SYSTEM H 1 12 2582.502 1, 4" SOLID LINE.WHITE- POLYPREF (GRIN) A LIN FT 2046.00 H 12 1 2582.502 1 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW -POLY PREF GRIN 11 LIN FT 121.00 H 12 2582.502 1 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW -POLY PREF GRIN REMOVE SIGN TYPE C LIN FT 230.00 H 12. 2582.502 IL 4" DB SOL® LINE YELLOW- POLYPREF GRIN . H LIN FT 674.00 H 1 12 2582.502 1 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -EPDXY A LIN FT 7552.00 H 12 2582.502 1 12" SOLID LINE WHITE -EPDXY 11 LIN FT_ 22.00 H 12 2582.502 4" DOTTED LINE WHITE -EPDXY REMOVE SIGN TYPE C LIN FT 2892.00 H 12 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY H LIN FT 550.00 H' 12 2582.618. PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL SOFT 4458.00 H 12 2582.618 PAVEMENTMARKING SPECIAL 2 SO FT 16.33 H 12' 2582.618 PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 3 SO FT 1 116.78 NOTES. (1) REGARDLESS OF DEPTH (2) SHREDDED HARDWOOD (3) PLANTING BEDS TABULATION INDEX TAB SHEETNO. TABULATION A 11 SIGN PANELS TYPE C B 11 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE C C 11 SIGN PANELS TYPE D D Al FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE D E 11 REMOVE SIGN TYPE C F 12: ISIGN PANELS TYPE SPECIAL G 12 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE SPECIAL H 12 1 TABULATION OF PAVEMENT MARKING QUANTITIES 1 1 12 IREMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING BASIS OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ITEM BASIS THESE STANDARD PLATES AS APPROVED BY THE FHWA S14ALLAPPLY QQ BITUMINOUS MIXTURE 110 POUNDS /SOYD /INCH OF MIX CONCRETE ENCASED CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS ov BITUMI NOUS TACK COAT 0.03 TO 0.05 GAL /SQYD04 NEW PAVEMENTS. BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 0. 07TOQ10 GAL / SQYDONCONCRETE PAVEMENT AN0MILLEDSURFACES. 0 t/] W F Cn ~zE- Csi d E fi. A CV E.W.. 1 A E- ,� -E d A W E- A as °w� z z o w vn w w d d G4 E- v� Q � -aLL 1� W V ax 0 O Z 2 W N O -2 0. W 0 Z N 70 Y ami�Wa o �WV Szv~i = rat aZW j i`yw w� M , m Q N Ua0 —ZOO ), >< >-Q� N O m,v W W�000wX o Lo aZaa�o S DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 IMP.# X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 = 2 OF 42 MNDOTSTANDARD PLATES THESE STANDARD PLATES AS APPROVED BY THE FHWA S14ALLAPPLY QQ DESCRIPTION 4026A CONCRETE ENCASED CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS ov CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN BAND DESIGN V 80001 ISTANDARD n N N co 0 m a' I N � -aLL 1� W V ax 0 O Z 2 W N O -2 0. W 0 Z N 70 Y ami�Wa o �WV Szv~i = rat aZW j i`yw w� M , m Q N Ua0 —ZOO ), >< >-Q� N O m,v W W�000wX o Lo aZaa�o S DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 IMP.# X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 = 2 OF 42 MNDOTSTANDARD PLATES THESE STANDARD PLATES AS APPROVED BY THE FHWA S14ALLAPPLY PLATE NO. DESCRIPTION 4026A CONCRETE ENCASED CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS 7100H CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN BAND DESIGN V 80001 ISTANDARD BARRICADES � -aLL 1� W V ax 0 O Z 2 W N O -2 0. W 0 Z N 70 Y ami�Wa o �WV Szv~i = rat aZW j i`yw w� M , m Q N Ua0 —ZOO ), >< >-Q� N O m,v W W�000wX o Lo aZaa�o S DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 IMP.# X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 = 2 OF 42 a N. f10� �Ni Nm� M1N: 0 5 O N 3 m z N 9 0 0 � N a - N/ N -N Y10 -NO nmx GENERAL 1. THE GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE THE 2005 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY OF EDINA. 2. STREET CENTERLINE AND RIGHT -OF -WAY SHOWN IN THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON CITY OF EDINA GIS INFORMATION. THE PROJECT SURVEYOR SHALL LOCATE PROPERTY CORNERS AND STAKE RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BEGINNING TO CONFIRM RIGHT -OF -WAY LIMITS AS NECESSARY. 3. ALL WORK SHALL OCCUR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ADJACENT FACILITIES AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT LIMITS. S. WHENEVER THE WORD "INCIDENTAL" IS USED IN THIS PLAN; IT SHALL MEAN THIS WORK WILL BE INCIDENTAL FOR WHICH NO DIRECT COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE. 6. REFER TO THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 7. REMOVE ALL SEDIMENTS AND SOILS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS. REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS. WHEN TRACKING OCCURS AND MAY BE ORDERED BY CITY INSPECTORS AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. SWEEPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DONE IN A MANNER TO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, B. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL PUBUCAND PRIVATE CATCH BASIN. •NLETS, WHICH RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN, REMOVE SEDIMENT OR REPLACE STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ON A ROUTINE BASIS SUCH THAT THE DEVICES ARE FULLY FUNCTIONAL FOR THE NEXT RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN. AND /OR PLUGGING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. MAY AND STRAW BALES OR FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED GRATES ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR INLET PROTECTION: 9. LOCATE SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING, VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS. CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN TWO FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE /GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24 HOURS. 10. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY. 11. TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS WHICH HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL GRADING, AND ALL AREAS IN WHICH GRADING OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSK)N DUE TO RAIN, WIND AND RUNNING WATER WITHIN 7 -14 DAYS. USE SEED AND MULCH, EROSION CONTROL MATTING, AND /OR SCDDING AND STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC; STRUCTURAL, NON- BIODEGRADABLE EROSION AND. SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION. WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT. FINAL STABILIZATION FOR PURPOSES OF THIS RE_ MOVAL IS 70% ESTABLISHED COVER OVER DENUDED AREA 12. ALL CONCRETERELATED PRODUCTION, CLEANING AND MIXING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DONE IN THE DESIGNATED AREAS: UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE MAY WASHOUT WATER DRAIN ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR INTO ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STORM DRAIN CONVEYANCE. 13. REFER TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS. REMOVALS 14. REMOVAL LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT LIMITS WITH THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. 1S. BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE ITEMS DISTURBED BYTHE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC, 2104.30. MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT OPERATIONS TO MAINTAIN PEDESTRIAN AND TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS THROUGH THE PROJECT LIMITS AT ALL TIMES. 17: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE A MINIMUM OF 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, OR MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOILS, EXCAVATION; PAVING, AND RESTORATION 38. SOIL DECOMPACTION -AFTER REMOVAL OF INPLACE PAVEMENT STRUCTURE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL AND TURF OR PLANTINGS IN AREAS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY SURFACED WITH PAVEMENTS OR SIDEWALKS,.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DECOMPACT THE INPLACE SUBGRADE SOILS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DOWN A MINIMUM OF 30" FROM THE EXISTING GRADE, COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL PAVEMENTS AND AGGREGATE.BASE MATERIALS, AND BLEND THE REMAINING SUBGRADE SOILS FOR UNIFORMITY, REPLACE TO FINISHED GRADE, AND UGHTLY COMPACT. THIS WORK SHALL BE PAID FOR UNDER THE ITEM "SUBGRADE EXCAVATION", UTILITY CONTACT LI ST UTILITY CONTACT PHONE COMCAST KELLYDOONAN 612- 369 -5939 CENTERPOINT ENERGY DEAN NICHOLAS. 612- 321 -5561 CENTURYLINK GARYROBACK MARK HEMMESCH 612 - 663 -0887 612 -861 -8149 XCELENERGY GREGG WENZEL 952 - 829.4513 CITY OF MIN NEAPOLIS- SURFACE WATERS &SEWER KIEV INDANEN 612- 673=5627 CITYOF MINNEAPOLIS - WATER DISTRIBUTION MARIE ASGIAN 612 - 673.5682 UTILITY NOTES 19. GRADING GRADE IS DEFINED AS THE BOTTOM OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, TYPICALLY CLASS 5 t. IF THE CONTRACTOR DISCOVERS UTILITY PROPERTY WHOSE EXISTENCE WAS NOT KNOWN, AGGREGATE BASE MATERIALS (MN /DOT SPECIFICATION 3138)., THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE UTILITY OWNER AND THE ENGINEER. 20: WHERE CONNECTING NEW SURFACING ADJACENT TOANY IN, PLACE PAVEMENTS, CUT VERTICALLYTO THE BOTTOM OF THE IN -PLACE SURFACING OR TOP OF GRADING GRADE, WHICHEVER IS DEEPER, THEN TAPER TRANSVERSELY AT 1:1(V:H) TO THE BOTTOM OF THE RECOMMENDED SUBGRADE EXCAVATION. 21. IN ALL PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD STRIVE TO SUBSTANTIALLY MATCH THE SOILS IN -PLACE UNDER THE ROADWAYS. FOR EXAMPLE, GRANULAR BACKFILL SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED ADJACENT TO NON - GRANULAR SOILS, IN ORDER TO PREVENT AN ABRUPT SOILS DIFFERENTIAL. 22. PAVEMENT PATCHING - UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PAVEMENT PATCHES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO MATCH EXACTLY THE THICKNESSES AND MATERIAL TYPES OF THE ADJACENT PAVEMENT, AGGREGATE BASE, AND GRANULAR SUBBASE LAYERS. PAVEMENT INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF EDINA DURING PROJECT DESIGN AS DETERMINED FROM EXISTING CONSTRUCTION PLAN DATA AND UTILITY CUT INFORMATION IS DEPICTED IN THE PAVEMENT DETAILS IN THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE THAT THE ACTUAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS IN PLACE MAY DIFFER PROM THE SECTIONS SHOWN IN THESE PLANS. PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FOR ACTUAL QUANTITIES OF MATERIALS PLACED UNDER THE APPROPRIATE PAY ITEMS. 23. OBTAIN COMPACTION ON THE GRADING PORTIONS OF PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD" REQUIREMENTS, MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2105.3F1. 24. COMPACTION OF AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "PENETRATION INDEX METHOD" REQUIREMENTS. 25. COMPACTION OF BITUMINOUS WEAR AND NON -WEAR PAVEMENTS SHALL BE BY THE MAXIMUM DENSITY METHOD. 26. USE TACK COAT BETWEENALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURE LIFTS AND PRIOR TO PLACING ANY BITUMINOUS MIXTURES ON EXISTING PAVEMENT. THE ROADWAY SURFACE SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF DEBRIS PRIOR TO APPLYING TACK. BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF 0.03 TO 0.05 GAL/SQ YD BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS LAYERS AND A RATE OF 0.07 TO 0.10 GAL/SQ YD ON CONCRETE PAVEMENT AND MILLED BITUMINOUS SURFACES PRIOR TO BEING OVERLAID: THESE APPLICATION RATES ARE FOR UNDILUTED EMULSIONS (AS SUPPLIED FROM THE REFINERY) OR MC AND RC LIQUID ASPHALT. THE ASPHALT EMULSION MAY BE FURTHER DILUTED IN THE FIELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /DOT 2357. 27. AS A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT, TRAFFIC LANES TO BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DELINEATED TO KEEP VEHICLES A SAFE DISTANCE AWAY FROM THE ADJACENT EXCAVATION. THE DELINEATION SHOULD COINCIDE WITH POINTS ESTABLISHED BY PROJECTING 1:2 OR GREATER (FLATTER) SLOPE BETWEEN THE EDGE OF THE TRAFFIC SURFACE AND THE BOTTOM OF THE EXCAVATION. 28. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND BE DISPOSED OF OFF SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 29. ANY DEBRIS WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED DURING GRADING SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF THE PROJECT RIGHT OF WAY IN A SUITABLE DISPOSAL AREA AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 30. DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION 2105.31D. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL UTILITY OWNERS AND TO ASCERTAIN THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE PERFORMING EXCAVATION OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN A MANNER THAT WILL PREVENT DAMAGE TO ANY OF THEM. 3. STATE LAW REQUIRES ANYONE EXCAVATING OR DRILLING IN THE GROUND IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH POWER EQUIPMENT TO CALL GOPHER STATE "ONE CALL" AT 6511454 -0002 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE STARTING WORK. 4. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CVASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDEUNES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA ". 5. THE EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN IN THE PLANS WERE DETERMINED FROM DRAWINGS FURNISHED BY THE UTILITY OWNERS AND ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATIONS IN THE FIELD. 6. CITY OF EDINA AND MINNEAPOLIS OWNED UTILITIES SHALL BE ADJUSTED, RELOCATED, OR REMOVED UNDER THIS CONTRACT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLANS. ALL OTHER PRIVATE UTILITY WORK SHALL BE BY OTHERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE CONTRACT. STATE PROJ. #: 120 - 091 -002 C/] W H O z W A O d z E- C/2 o a F F, U U A d a E- E- z C/] O z U O F E- j M w ono ' i m N N N 0 0 ° CK Lj i� N o v° 4 1� W �NESOT� Sap Al a 6sg "a 0 ozZw v 0 U Ln NW�Z O F -mWYW� W >WWQ ai�x O ur EM Q N cia °_ZOO o �3ar'TWJZ W�dzzoir o amaa o a DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: SAW APPROVED: SAW X3- 4 OF 42 TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES & GUIDEL.INFS GENERAL INFORMATION: 1..THE CONTRACTOR SHALL' FURNISH, INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THE DEVICES IN THIS TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IN PLACE SIGNING MUST ALSO BE MAINTAINED OR TEMPORARILY RELOCATED FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. FIELD'CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS OF THIS.LAYOUT AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ALL DISTANCES ARE.APPROXIMATE. PLANS ARE NOT DRAWN TO 'SCALE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY WORK AREAS NEAR TRAFFIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNMUTCD.' 5. SIGN INSTALLATIONS SHALL NOT.OBSTRUCT EXISTING SIGNS. 6. THE ITEM "TRAFFIC CONTROL" COVERS ALL DEVICES SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHEETS AND OTHER SETUPS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. ::SIGNING: 1. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INCLUDING OVERHEAD SIGNS ON _.ROADS OPEN TO TRAFFIC THAT ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH TRAFFIC ,OPERATION SHALL BE COVERED, REMOVED OR'REVISED AS DIRECTED BY THE.ENGINEER. 2. WHEN SIGNS ARE INSTALLED, THEY SHALL BE MOUNTED ON POSTS DRIVEN:INTO THE GROUND AT THE PROPER HEIGHT AND LATERAL OFFSET :AS,DETAILED'.IN THE ATTACHED TYPICAL SIGN FRAMING. AND INSTALLATION DETAILS. IF. THIS IS'NOT POSSIBLE, THEY WILL BE MOUNTED ON`,PORTABLE SUPPORTS AS.APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.- WHEN THE SIGNS ARE REMOVED THE SIGN POSTS SHALL ALSO BE REMOVED WITHIN 2 WEEKS (5- 18.4(8)). 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY EXTRA SIGNING NEEDED TO FACILITATE TRAFFIC SWITCHES OR FOR TRANSITIONING TRAFFIC FROM ONE STAGE TO ANOTHER. 4. ALL TEMPORARY RIGID ORANGE WARNING AND RIGID ORANGE GUIDE SIGNS SHALL BE FABRICATED WITH TYPE HP FLO (HIGH PERFORMANCE FLUORESCENT.SIGN SHEETING FOR RIGID TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SIGNS). ALL RIGID SIGNS INSTALLED,, OTHER THAN THOSE WITH ORANGE BACKGROUNDS, ON A TEMPORARY BASIS SHALL BE FABRICATED WITH TYPE HP (HIGH PERFORMANCE SHEETING FOR RIGID PERMANENT,SIGNS). INPLACE SIGNS THAT STILL APPLY DURING TEMPORARY OPERATIONS MAY REMAIN IN PLACE WITH NO CHANGE IN SIGN SHEETING' REQUIRED. BARRICADES FABRICATE D,WITH EITHER ASTM,TYPE VII, SIGN SHEETING FOR RIGID TEMPORARY SIGNS OR TYPE HP (HIGH PERFORMANCE SHEETING FOR RIGID PERMANENT SIGNS) MAY BE INTERMIXED AND USED ON ANY PROJECT UNTIL THE JANUARY 1, 2010 IMPLEMENTATION DATE. 5. LONGITUDINAL DROPOFFS SHALL BE SIGNED AS SHOWN IN THE "TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS" FIELD MANUAL UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THESE PLANS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF THE FINAL SIGNS TO ASSURE THAT THE FINAL SIGNS ARE INSTALLED AS NEEDED, OR PROVIDE TEMPORARY SIGNING AT THEIR EXPENSE UNTIL THE FINAL SIGNING IS INSTALLED. PAVEMENT MARKING: 1. OBLITERATE ANY CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. PAINT, POLYMER LANE TAPE AND /OR TRPM'S ARE ACCEPTABLE TEMPORARY STRIPING ALTERNATIVES ACCORDING TO ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED AS DIRECTED BY THE,ENGINEER. GENERALLY, ONLY PAINT WILL BE USED BEFORE MAY 1ST OR WHEN THE OTHER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS CAN NOT BE MET. 3. TRPM'S (TEMPORARY RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS) SHOULD BE USED TO SUPPLEMENT THE LONG TERM (MORE THE' 3 DAYS) EDGELINES ON ALL TRANSITION AREAS WHEN THE CONDITIONS ARE WITHIN THE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 4. THE.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY AND FINAL STRIPING. 3 ' O O° N -TRAFFIC CONTROL: DOW s a SYMR0LS LRGFND 9YMSOL DESCRIPTION TYPE A FLASHING WARNING LIGHTS • — RETROREFLECTIVE DRUM, TYPE I OR TYPE II BARRICADE, VERTICAL PANEL �— — SIGN (SHOWN FACING LEFT) LJ — TYPE III BARRICADE II�II r II w =q . U Gi. k2 q N a no GTy mNNN m� O 0zN�`+ �r d .... voa4 V ?HE50 >� a U ;v! o JI ozft vl 0 'n'.' v'I v °z o ��57o v Q?Q�J Wr Z F W N 0 3 N 4 d W w RKm Q Zo� T Q , '�z z m , DRAWN: KAS i; CHECKED: TJJ APPROVED: SAW r DATE:. 05 08 12 �O CONTR X \ . ENG OOX w N "max STATE PROJ. : 120 -091 -002 SHEET 5 ' 0 42jj " NOTES Y " 1. MINIMUM PAVED LANE WIDTH FROM THE CHANNELIZING Z mac° DEVICES TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR OUTSIDE EDGE E OV3HV ' OF THE SHOULDER "SHALL BE 10 FT. m mHom ".� T 2. - REQUIRED IF THERE IS LESS THAN 10 FT. OF PAVED avow SURFACE AVAILABLE TO PASS THE WORK SPACE. � 3. PARKING AND STOPPING SHALL BE PROHIBITED ALONG. THE a cy WORK AREA AND TAPERS. °o 38V Ol 03atld3ad --- -T- 4. 4. TAPER LENGTH (L) IS BASED ON A'8 FT. OFFSET. ADJUST z • 38: DIFFERENT OFFSETS. - 0 Ln . N .. _ cn Go 7� o DRUMS. TYPE I OR TYPE I'I. d N O '^ BARRICADE OR VERTICAL PANEL. �, w e A °i a m CX6. m w • w NOTES ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING '- oz SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE "MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC • w PART VI, "FIELD n N MANUALLF RVTEMPORARY TRAFFICA CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS ". v • • CD 7 M O O NL • • r m N N pi ,. O 0 N N d 7 < 10 BE i PREPARED__ 8g TO STOP o. Ln N.. ROAD WORK AHAD E oz v - - w v NWV -{VZ p f m a. 6 aJW z � ix- W V) 0 Z Vl N r Q F Q Z= co o W 0 0 0 V W i O 6 _ =JZZO: t - amaai-o .d 0 WORK SPACE IN CENTER OF ROAD DRAWN: KaS TWO LANE TWO WAY ROAD 30 MPH SAW g APPROVE: d NOT TO BE USED FOR MORE THAN THREE CALENDAR DAYS DATE: 05/08/12 o=n oo- IMP.# X3 -XXX " m",0 CONTR. ENG 00 -X AN % STATE PROJ. :. 120- 091 -002 SHEET 6 of 42 a o= 00 N m\ Nm MI1I1 OV3HV MOM Y Z o OV08 T OV3HV J— av 0 3NV103NO N NOTES: T 1. FOR ANY EXCAVATION OR DROP -OFF IN EXCESS OF 12 IN., I I o e SEE THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL o o DEVICES SECTION 6F, PORTABLE BARRIERS. Z dO1S 01 03dVd3Md T 38 Ln 0 N ca T � DRUMS, TYPE I OR TYPE II o BARRICADE OR VERTICAL PANEL. {3 A uj N 1 ° A O • '�' z • o °4 0 • 'n Y U NOTES ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING m Cz SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE �+ v TO THE "MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC Z CONTROL DEVICES" (MN MUTCD) AND PART VI, "FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS ". c E c� u — F Q oM q � N N�• W moo o v 1 ^�• Ili Ex., "o o • O 2tVN E~ o a oa i° Q O n W lA N <0 N BE i PREPARED TO STOP a Ln N8 "_ ONE LANE ROAD N AHEAD � � o 0 ROAD °=Z� g WORK-s» v AHEAD mw >W� o 0 N F_ W N O Z N o W a W W UaOaZLLH N yo mQm<w w O 3 ¢ w l4 J O lg W Z O O O W i a =m o N LANE CLOSURE, TWO FLAGGERS DRAWN: Kass 9 TWO LANE TWO WAY ROAD ( 30 MPH) CHECKED: TJJ APPROVED: SAW g DATE: 05/08/12 N NOT TO BE USED FOR MORE THAN THREE CALENDAR DAYS IMP.# X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X o x STATE PROJ. 120- 091 -002 SHEET 7 OP 42 6 N 00 m: N0 nN i F- I I � I I -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 C G ': G- W 54TH ST -OHP OHP - GHP - OHP - -1`_ I l I Ld I > U Q V� Ld CC 1 --F I I � � I I 4 H LEGEND ® REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - -- - - - SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) — — — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - -- - - - - -- RIGHT OF WAY ® INLET PROTECTION I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J. — L - ----- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - l- 1— OHP Oflf -- c_ c - ' — OHF A z d a d � � H E- z U -------------------------- X F A C!2 i r,cnzo m z c x w I I z C%Z I I w EXISTING CONDITIONS, REMOVALS, I i AND EROSION CONTROL i T W 54TH ST AND DREW AVE a PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION I I ~ LEGEND I W 7M O I CURB AND GUTTER Lt m n m m Q i (SEE PLAN FOR TYPE) O& f l i LANDSCAPE AREA g H- w I (REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN) I _ L REFER TO SIGNING AND s�NE50r,0 1 1 — 1 1 -- -- 1 1 - - - -- 1 ; - i'. 1 _ PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN z� 2' 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - ------------------------------- - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - -J '� I- - OR A - - - - - --- _---- __- __- __- __- __- __- __ -_ -__ ____ F ADDITION L INFORMATION 1- 1 1 1 y � - - G l i V _ W 54TH ST 9mi ` 3 r ` ` G i 4 �N 00 m: Nm /1 N LEGEND ~ I I ? I I I I ® REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT r _ Ld - - - - - - i � '� "� � i SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Y Q (FULL DEPTH) z CONSTRUCTION LIMITS r ! - RIGHT OF WAY INLET PROTECTION 1 1— 1 1 1 1 ! I c - --- ---- ----- --- --- ---- - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - ®` 1 U 1 i 1 2 - - - - - J L - - - - - - - ----------------- l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 �. .� ��1\ --------------------------------------------- W 54TH ST 17 ,- < < u> ' -> < < _ — » CSC < �.7 < ~ / c — -- < c -- a I GHP UHF—(;HP JHP --- ='aQ I / Via-- ----- 91. w W OHP —JHP .\ JHP -OHF OHr OHP OHP fiHF -OIIP OP lHP— 1 O z Hi Q O i I � F' A C] I c U U w Ala E -' I W EXISTING CONDITIONS, REMOVALS, i I AND EROSION CONTROL W 54TH ST AND BEARD AVE Q PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION I � ° i i i LEGEND w �MOo - o a l l Q I ® CURB AND GUTTER O (SEE PLAN FOR TYPE) p z m co r I I I LANDSCAPE AREA g o rn (REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN) "o L I V LLI nwa4 m I J. 1 REFER TO SIGNING AND dNEI \q =-I PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN - -- — — — — — — — — -------- — — — — — — — — — — -- — — J �- — - -- -------------------------- - - - - -- — — FIIR�4QQI1_IQNAL_�LNFQBMAT_ION 1- 1 111 1. 1` Vi ` -` � W 54TH ST 3 °1 -� —I -- R M >> M < < —cQ 18' DIA —(!Hp OHP OIIF' - -pHF' -�2C=+ / / ',= (BHP- iHP _— __— __ —IHF OHF �_OHP OHP —t,HF OHF OHP o __— __— __— __— __— __ —__ —_ til - - - - - - - 31' C-W Q / __ —_ 57 y� a O NOTES -I I Qm1�W~ O = I• �WVIa=N Z "- O] 8624 CURB AND GUTTER (OUTFALL) GENERAL NOTESt 3 MATCH INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT I i FWW WF ;4 ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS �iILLOX O LANDSCAPE WITH ORNAMENTAL TREE. SHRUBS. AND MULCH I OTHERWISE NOTED vna•.o 00 8 (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN). MODIFY SUBGRADE - REFER TO ma�a� z o W3.��WaZ 117 4 CONSTRUCTION NOTES. I I wz¢-Z am'mFo Q3 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING TO 1/4" MIN. I 3 TO 3/8" MAX. BELOW FINISHED GRADE DRAWN: KAS o I I I CHECKED: TJJ S 40 DATE:OVE 05/08/12 Y N IM X3 -XXX 7 W 54TH ST AND BEARD AVE CONTR. EN000 -X SCALE IN FEET STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 SHEET 9 of ¢Q g 00 N Y m 5 6 PLANTING NOTES: INSTALL 12" PLANTING SOIL TO ALL PLANTING AREAS. STAKE OR MARK ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. HAVE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE APPROVE AL STAKING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ALL SHRUB AREAS TO BE BED MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC. PLANTING SOIL SHALL CONSIST OF ONE PART EXISTING SOIL BY VOLUME, ONE PART SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW BY VOLUME, AND ONE PART COMPOST BY VOLUME. COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING AT THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS PROMPTLY (AS PER DIRECTION OF OWNER). ALL MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH BROWN CREPE TREE WRAP. APPLY WRAP IN NOVEMBER AND REMOVE IN APRIL. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651- 454 -0002 FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND AVOID DAMAGE TO UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. MAINTAIN ALL PLANT MATERIALS, INCLUDING WATERING, UNTIL THE TIME OF ACCEPTANCE. STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES OPTIONAL: MAINTAIN PLUMBNESS OF TREES FOR DURATION OF WARRANTY PERIOD. SWEEP AND WASH ALL PAVED SURFACES AND REMOVE ALL DEBRIS RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS. I NOTE: TREE STAKING OPTIONAL GUYING PRUNE DEAD AND BROKEN PLAN BRANCHES 16" POLY STRAP 40 MIL. 1 -1/2" WIDE 3 -GUY CABLES DOUBLE STRAND 14GA. WIRES AT ONE FLAG PER WIRE 12D' SPACING REMOVE ROPE AND BURLAP MULCH - 4" DEEP FROM UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL DOUBLE SHREDDED 18" MACHINE EDGE V -DITCH AROUND MULCH ALL TREES IN SODDED AREAS ROOTBALL MIN. 3 -GUY STAKES AT 120' SPACING PLANTING SOIL 2 "X2 "X24" WOOD STAKE AT AN p ANGLE =1 I- III -I , �I- ICI -ICI - III -I I ':• :' - I -I � I -I � 11 -III .. ,III ... III ... I PREPARE AREA 2 TIMES THE WIDTH OF ROOTBALL TYPICAL LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE — TRAFFIC CIRCLE QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE REMARKS ORNAMENTAL TREES 1 SB CLUMP SERVICEBERRY 6' B &B STRAIGHT TRUNK. NO V- CROTCH Amelonchier x grondifloro 'Aumtumn Brilliance' SHRUBS 3 NF NEON FLASH SPIREA 18" HT., CONT. MIN. s awes Spires japonica 'Neon Flash' AT HT. SPEC. PERENNIALS 8 BS BLUE SALVIA 1 GAL., CONT. Salvia 'Viola Klose' 9 CM WALKER'S LOW CATMINT 1 GAL., CONT. N. x foasenii 'Walker Low' 8 PD PARDON ME DAYLILY 1 GAL., CONT. Hemerocollis 'Pardon Me' 8 SO STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY 1 GAL., CONT. Hemerocollis 'Stella Supreme' NOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN EVENT OF DISCREPANCEY. 0 TREE PLANTING DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE PRUNE DEAD AND BROKEN BRANCHES MULCH PLANTING SOIL DRAINAGE MOUND ■ ii ■ 8 -SD 9 -CM om -ism 3 -NF TYPICAL TRAFFIC CIRCLE LANDSCAPING W 54TH ST /BEARD AVE W 54TH ST /DREW AVE z C]. W d V f/] A z ti °n A o _ N moo �n I ly m�NN 22", E, a LL V b • � •g 7 o �g9C"'C 2.5itt N CN N NW�W W4 to �S JZ0 N ¢ 7 ¢ma�ra °z is F! FwW <,C W d O a Q W o - <.3r. wz"o xW J Z Z Q=? - C7QJ-� DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: SAW APPROVED: MK DATE: 05/08112 STATE PROJ. #: 120- 091 -002 (SHEET 10 OF 42 a n vo N r\ �� MIN 4 N 015 00 +N m\ NO MI N O 0 O N 3 a m 5 W O 0 0 � N 6 N / - -ro -o- - NO O \ N Nm / mo% r- 27.6" --►� 5'6' 110.1 3'4" BICYCLE SYMBOL WITH ARROW MESSAGE SHALL BE WHITE EPDXY i PAVEMENT MESSAGE POLY PREFORM ;BL VD PAVEMENT MESSAGES SHALL BE POSITIONED ACCORDING TO DIRECTION OF APPROACHING TRAFFIC BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING BIKE BOULEVARD PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 3 CURB * PARKING LANE ~ 50' 0 J m IX CENTERLINE OR DOUBLE YELLOW PAVEMENT MESSAGES SHALL BE POSITIONED AS DETAILED ABOVE AND ACCORDING TO DIRECTION OF APPROACHING TRAFFIC. 1c IF NO PARKING LANE THEN PLACE BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD MESSAGE IN THE CENTER OF THE LANE WIDTH X 14 - 15' 1' >1 5 - 17' 2' >1 7 - 19' 3' >19 -21' 4' BICYCLE BOULEVARD PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL BIKE LANE 4" DOTTED LINE, WHITE EPDXY (4' MARKING, 12' GAP) _ Ln - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BIKE LANE PARKING LANE co WOODDALE AVE S ADVISORY LANE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL a d A z x d W W 7 a A ° �o mnN 0 J .E cc � n w 0 3-RJ ALA a o Z Z W N VIWMWO op �57� v 1--m Wi WIW a0m7 ZWF Z �WInOVf 4QUQz a jc zoo >Q>Q °�W O z W C. 1- W J - IA M Woow� O J Q a O )RAWN: KAS ;HECKED: TJJ APPROVED: MRA I STATE PROJ.#: 120 - 091 -002 (SHEET 13 OF 42 i 0 O Np i m cC O 6 u N W O O 0 a �= N/ iOON �NNO NON SHARED LANE PAVEMENT MARKING (POLYPREFORM) (PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 4) 0 N L I VI I.. u I % u FACE OF CURB VALLEY VIEW RD GREEN COLORIZED SHARED LANE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL GREEN COLORIZED PAVEMENT MARKING (PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1) E— E- C=3 w d a ir 1 c� k y I r to jH d Y 2,Ificres! W 4 `.�+ aoF L"�` I tTiy''I ?r5t4 rsiF a e.� _., 8" NP . + $ � v �i.. � '� X71 •{' R :_,i � xtt --r,. a _t ka I I1 r.*•..t ,�''tj;a �,wrai�c,6. u YLxf '' h Sd "+. 8 }r}... a ,.4 Iffe 3 I all ZZ i THE CENTER OF THE BIKE DETECTOR PAVEMENT MESSAGES ffiZN� SHALL BE POSITIONED ON TOP OF THE EXISTING VISIBLE N W °wQz m 25• 'PUCK- LIKE" DETECTORS AS INDICATION ON THE SIGNING s» v y1. AND STRIPING PLANS. ama�wa F- 0721W Z �NO3 I- N 4a Wa W= THE BIKE DETECTOR PAVEMENT MESSAGE SHALL BE WHITE ', � EPDXY ua° -zoo co m 3�avai <Z CD W Q Ir 13 Irz E5 WJZ n QOOOW� a�aa�o BIKE DETECTOR PAVEMENT MARKING CHECKED: Tau PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 2 APPROVED: MRA SHARED LANE PAVEMENT MARKING DATE: 05/08/12 IMP.# X3 -XXR PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 4 CONTRI ENG 00 -X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 SHEET 14 of 42 a N NN m. N0 VIN NOTES ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT Y MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE z UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. ZO 0 JOTS ean�e�o� e ��„ z H Cornelia Dr x w ennnn a o.. 1 W p Z a STOP J [ N 2 W J U Y 0. Z L T Q C0 A 0 L- z � x o L ~ PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE - EPDXY Z Q TRIANGLE - PAINT in 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT A SQUARE - POLY PREFORM EXISTING AND REMOVALS WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4'. 8% ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE Q B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW an PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B -BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD- SPECIAL 3)' PROPOSED g°p PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) BC) A i'Mo EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING- SPECIAL 4)' PREFORM o a g. PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY SCALE IN FEET (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' mj mi PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13-14 —EXISTING PAVEMENT n w — MARKINGS V 8 ® ecm as Cornelia Dr e�t�oro�� m Q a uj oz 4 qO, p4p 0.O0. H ��5�. 00t �`S TOP J ama�Wa o a s �- `� F�OwNOZN � Y N - ^ - �:J J FWW w� m L T O L mim¢Nof = O v)>�o ao O .Nr L s ti °O SPECIFIC NOTESRaZZow4 ° z- am¢a�o a N [ O1 FURNISH & INSTALL DRAWN: KAS w 7 O2 REMOVE CHECKED: KAB °_ 3 SALVAGE &REINSTALL APPROVED: MRA Q DATE: 05 08 12 IMP.#' X3 -XXX N N CONTR. ENG 00 -X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 SHEET 15 of 42 a NO Nm n�fl NOTES ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT x MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE o UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. rO � a ` O T: Z 6� ,< Q a m z F, w x C`9 0. �� E- o Cornelia Dr ca z a cc r4 Y a z tiJ Qa ca � Y,b� z d x PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE - EPDXY cG Z z Q TRIANGLE - PAINT C/] 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM EXISTING AND REMOVALS WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE © Q' B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW grg PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)- cn PROPOSED g.p PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) A %0 � EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' W m ^o PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY 80 o ry ry (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' _ �' ms W o PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY ���� '= (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' .. SCALE IN FEET c. �jr o SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 _ MARKINGS AVEMENT ✓P \ y`o Otte � i a ��� oNZZ co Corne I l a Dr NW�UO N 2 i C H)6j= O _WN2ZN O N J. ?Q HQZW Y q Wa0_<p'- J u Z o q le, SPECIFIC NOTESt }asavo -ice o Ol FURNISH & INSTALL °z °z0W1 0 u_az H. -0 O REMOVE DRAWN: KAS N 9 O3 SALVAGE & REINSTALL CHECKED: KAB g APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 N N IMP.# X3 -XXX CONTRJ ENG 00 -X 7 STATE PROD. : 17_0 -091 -002 SHEET 16 OF42 MATCHLINE B NOTE: ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT Y MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL W s + INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. N o -c +_ co w Lo o . isr z dol S z 008 aloP4lno v U' Go ZEl_ Southdale Rd A d d'w Z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE -EPDXY ca Z A A TRIANGLE - PAINT �> C/] 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM EXISTING AND REMOVALS ' WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 1 4% 8% ETC. S -SOLID W - WHITE Q B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM.(GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B -BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD- SPECIAL 3)' o^� MATCHL INE B �p PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) 80 q Ti's 'PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING = SPECIAL 4)- w »oo PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY r" ms4� (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW )• SCALE IN FEET o PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY m� (BIKE DETECTOR- SPECIAL 2)- c •• •• -i- 'SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT °n N — MARKINGS V /�NESOT� 9 -S co - Zr Ol S .3�P a N F Q Ln � �Z N Southda l e Rd S" 0 /'L ama8wa c . ID V Wx \ J ~ WKS wr�o ma�av z 0o o 9 SPECIFIC NOTES: =�zz0. 0 _a�ao.�o ,a DRAWN: KITS 0 Ol FURNISH & INSTALL CHECKED:, KAB REMOVE ED: APPROV MRA 9 DATE: 05/08/1 o O a $ nNi O3 SALVAGE & REINSTALL IMP.# x3 -XXX N.°..00 - CONTR. ENG 00 —X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 s "E� 17 ov 42 V1NX a :o m: Nm MI N mlt Southdale Rd EXISTING AND REMOVALS PROPOSED = Southdale Rd I- a SPECIFIC NOTES (D FURNISH & INSTALL O REMOVE O SALVAGE & REINSTALL 0 Q NOTES ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE uru cee nrucomrer KnTrn 11— A., 1ST DIGIT �D DIGIT \ 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR 80 (GROUND IN) 4% 8% ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOWS PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY WD PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' PREFORM ~ PAVEMENT MESSAGE (BIKE SYMBOL WITH P BIKE ARROW)' PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• • SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT — MARKINGS 0 i I 3MIM 98 d ON STATE PROJ. #: 120 -091 -002_ z a. w z_ E, � x w I � D W W Y_ a dz d d m z z C/] o^ A � � ^o m N 0 N E�N� o�r � voa4 !� W �g�ryR 0 ozZW r O xs57z v Ir x0»W Z�- Z �WVION N a F Q Z 4 d W W wmo —zo0 N >�Oy >a�Q1n�W O CZW4JZ N mih0 WIC O _aoH 0 DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB 4PPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 IMP. X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X 'HILT 18 OF 42 80 SCALE IN FEET STATE PROJ. #: 120 -091 -002_ z a. w z_ E, � x w I � D W W Y_ a dz d d m z z C/] o^ A � � ^o m N 0 N E�N� o�r � voa4 !� W �g�ryR 0 ozZW r O xs57z v Ir x0»W Z�- Z �WVION N a F Q Z 4 d W W wmo —zo0 N >�Oy >a�Q1n�W O CZW4JZ N mih0 WIC O _aoH 0 DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB 4PPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 IMP. X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X 'HILT 18 OF 42 0 w z_ J 2 U F�- Q EXISTING AND REMOVALS PROPOSED w Z J 2 U a a N vo NO N aD \ NO wt N Southda1e Rd PAVEMENT MARKING KEY ( 1 CIRCLE - EPDXY QTRIANGLE - PAINT 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE -POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUNDIN) 4 -, 8% ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW gm PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) f D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' 1/r S, PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)• PREFORM ~ (BIKE SYMBOL WITH MESSAGE ARROW)' B() PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• SCALE IN FEET SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT — MARKINGS SPECIFIC NOTES: IO FURNISH & INSTALL O REMOVE O SALVAGE & REINSTALL Southdo 1 e Rd OV � NOTE: ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. Air 11 �r ' ro I STATE PROD. #: 120 -091 -002 z a z E- xz d� E~ � 7 W A � w z z q N n MOO Gr., m v N mm .. C n W a V a NN ips oo a�1 =- NO O Z z W N W� N xs5(jZ 7> a Q m LL J W Q 0 F_ °w'R c=v~i 4 a V Q W= 7 W F ,cx— . N O >.w> H9 N 0o m,w Lo >a'"� o Q a _am DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 19 of 42 NOTES ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. Li w z J 2 U F- a EXISTING AND REMOVALS Ll_ w z_ J 2 U F- a O 4 0 N 0 b NCc O N 9 0 7 N arvi no= ..rvo NO " N x SPECIFIC NOTESs Ol FURNISH & INSTALL O2 REMOVE O SALVAGE & REINSTALL C J C O N az L ow \ 0 i U PAVEMENT MARKING KEY 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT WIDTH PATTERN COLOR 4', 8 ", ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW D - DOTTEDIDOUBLE B - BLACK EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORM ` SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 C J C Oi O � N ° •- w90, � L v 'i Wooddale Ave CIRCLE - EPDXY QTRIANGLE - PAINT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM (GROUND IN) PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD- SPECIAL 3)- g'p PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)• g, y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW) - ��� PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• EXISTING PAVEMENT — MARKINGS Wooddale Ave PAVEMENT MARKI SPECIAL 1 (SEE SHEET 14) Ul O ATCHLINE G MATCHLI lots ST�p d0 11 yll07N S 1 O PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1 (SEE SHEET 14) cl- O .. w z _ J U a ME DOUBLE YELLOW MARKING 1 80 SCALE IN FEET I STATE PROJ J: 120- 091 -002 z CS � z H d� w a W � d � dCs7 AC z� z C7 C] antes 21 OF 42 iao Q q N '^ m 0 o m*ieo co co O w N 2 N od =.. nWat°� N., V /aNESOT9 I \` Zo \�i ax _ lei" - Ld z U o OZZW Q N VIW NUZ N 2 s 7 v ama�Wa o_ 77 w 4¢W NOZN u 4 Q U a 7 a w W 1 0 Z ZOO v))- .,c w o Kz; ywj�4JZ w 0 0 o 0 W O JZZK w k/ _.Mm 0 a DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA antes 21 OF 42 iao a AN O - N 0\ Nm M1N NOTES ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT x MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE vi UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL W o INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. c i- + N N L a i- 2 EXISTING BROKEN YELLOW + 2 EXISTING BROKEN YELLOW 0 Z PAVEMENT MARKING PAVEMENT MARKING cfl � _ � z w a w ... - - - - - - - -Wooddo+e Ave - y z H - e x w PQ Q E- o x o z o''a Ica w z _Y a A PAVEMENT MARKING KEY CIRCLE -EPDXY O ~ Z A TRIANGLE - PAINT C7 C/] EXISTING AND REMOVALS 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT WIDTH PATTERN 3RD DIGIT COLOR El SQUARE - POLY PREFORM (GROUND IN) Q. 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW %ra PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' o M PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY Wyp PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' 80 L� w ZJO Mo PREFORM °m y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY °nom �' 'mom (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' SCALE IN FEET o i PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY C s (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' � °f ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT na 4 — MARKINGS V 4- H- N i V) Z\ S 3� 4- �� ♦iP O to uo o 3 7 H gSy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -W- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J 14 14 I e Ave 14 J -5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - -� - - - - - - - - - - - - - U B 8 U �' c QC cCQ o oo G 6 o 0 Z W N oO E Fm S � g 45W 4DW 4DW FcN 03N z N 4DW 4DW o % v:o.0 z K C� J Q N ► UaF3 -z oo O 0 �[ SPECIFIC NOTESS NYF O } Q � W < mi _ OD O O O1 FURNISH & INSTALL C W 4 J z WZa oW =a z4m o p W O2 REMOVE DRAWN: KAS o O SALVAGE & REINSTALL CHECKED: APPROVED: KAB MRA DATE: OS 08 12 N IMP.# X3 -XXX 0 CONTR. ENG 00 -X "EE' 22 OF 42 X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 s a N AO -N Nm wl1(1 NOTE: ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL zz INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. } N N EXISTING 2 DOUBLE YELLOW PAVEMENT � c0 MARKING a 2 EXISTING BROKEN YELLOW Lo 2 EXISTING BROKEN YELLOW ATgTtr o PAVEMENT MARKING PAVEMENT MARKING n z d01S ° w z °~ — — — — — — — — — — — — Wooddo I e Ave -- — r� z J — Z C/2 Z C 1— a °' ° STOP ca z CL. ALL EAT b a z m A d d W � x PAVEMENT MARKING KEY ` ~ CIRCLE -EPDXY --- Q TRIANGLE - PAINT C/] 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM © ` EXISTING AND REMOVALS WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) z` 4% 8'. ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE Q' B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW am PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3) ^� W.p PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) 80 A 9i j� n PROPOSED EXAMPLE: F4-SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' W o o PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY m OiN (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)- SCALE IN FEET 0 & a1 o 4 co Cl2n� PAVEMENT MESSAGE -EPDXY o rn (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' �►. o�r li SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT i- n°�a } MARKINGS N V Ln L _ co a��z } � Avg T�v � N � c ON Lo Lo n dOlS o = S. w z %rc vZ+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -5'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 13' 13' -- J 14' - - - _ 14 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Wooddo I e -Ave- 11 I1' _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - -5 - - - - - - - U U B' B. 8. H = - 0 4DW �ozW NI 9�a O STOP ij N 57� R 4 � ama�wa o w °o0 4DW 4DY ALL DAY :'� �W¢°�o3w z N LLa�aWw SJ' NO FWW� CKK< -4 tQ„ N O r UN >-HO N co M ir' W o SPECIFIC NOTESL W3? n W Z (D FURNISH & INSTALL =aoaa o z W O2 REMOVE DRAWN: KAS S O SALVAGE & REINSTALL CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08 12 ry IMP.# X3 -XXX N CONTR.9 ENG 00 -X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 s "E� 23 oF 42 aN :0 o, Ao NOTE[ ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT Y MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL ID INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. Ir + � N C L c _v 2 EXISTING DOUBLE YELLOW 2 EXISTING BROKEN YELLOW 2 EXISTING BROKEN YELLOW 3 PAVEMENT MARKING PAVEMENT MARKING 0 PAVEMENT MARKING O o Z O 3 Y at z w � w Z 0. z — — — — — — — — — Woodd ©I a Ave J ul J 2 U 13e7 d] U2 Z E'- Z I— �� 0• Q < W / � E-• J /72BEGIN c z MOVAL m r Y v EXISTING SOLID WHITE DO W 00 1 CC PAVEMENT MARKING z � L I o d DQ L � PAVEMENT MARKING KEY CIRCLE -EPDXY 0 --- e� z 0 z - -- TRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING AND REMOVALS 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT WIDTH PATTERN COLOR a SQUARE - POLY PREFORM (GROUND IN) Z` Q' 4 ", 8 ", ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW %r9 PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3) PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY >ir> PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' 80 q �j'n rn W PREFORM r y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY m�NN (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' SCALE IN FEET '0° PAVEMENT MESSAGE -EPDXY (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' o ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENTa MARKINGS V � N 3r ?O m f p C O Alm v ^L' W 4DW 4DW 4DW 3 4DW 1 = a 0 0 is 7) 0 I— w pox z w H Z 3 UNT1 _ J _ _ _ U- - - - - 14' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14• Woodda I e Ave lg• �- - - - - - - - - - - � o Q 8' C = p BNWINUZrr,,�� �' �ZNa' co � v 9 F m W T W F C cs C J 4DW BEGIN 4SW 4DW ira�aW.a \ wms-<oo a; O \ ra>agw o O J Z y L C Z W 4 =JZZC WI��.i _aM<o. S = — SPECIFIC NOTESt DRAWN: KAS 9 L (D FURNISH & INSTALL 0 CHECKED: KAB 5 APPROVED: MRA o O2 REMOVE DATE: 05/08/12 X3 -XXX IMP.# $ O3 SALVAGE & REINSTALL CONTR. ENG DO -X 24 of 42 x STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 SHEET a N AG m: �m A� NOTE: ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE x UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL 92 INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. it 0 rr + V) L D EXISTING 0 + 3 2 PAVEMENT 2 EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING PAVEMENT °z MARKING � MARKING L > 2 MARKING .— N X Y Y J J J L d L1. Z Z ... C.7 — — — Wood�ale AVE — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — � W _Z Fr _ _— J Q x z a Q E-. O N ca z x C4 CLO L J � Ln z Ln a + A in z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE - EPDXY Z im Q TRIANGLE - PAINT C/] EXISTING AND REMOVALS 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT WIDTH PATTERN 3RD DIGIT COLOR SQUARE -POLY PREFORM (GROUND IN) Q' 4% 8'. ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW `%'r® PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTEDIDOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' o^� PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY W>> PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' 80 PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY �I (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' SCALE IN FEET w"'m°0 PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' r, = "0 o rn ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT } — MARKINGS L 0 0 4DW v: 4DW L 4DW '' 4DW C N Y Y v J J O J z Z g Z .9;r �! I8' 1- Ave - - IBS - J 2 IN L) - - _ s. y - - - - -le - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - p G P c N + V) OZZW �W�UZ N E 4 L m � W 0 4sW } 4sw Q R Q �r°�wczr�ii p 4DW Ij Ln ra~aa ` 4 a U W m } o Lo SPECIFIC NOTESc wQOOOw� Ol FURNISH & INSTALL =azaa�o DRAWN: KAS 0 2 REMOVE CHECKED: KAB 0o O SALVAGE & REINSTALL n 05/08/12 N IMP.# X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X SHEET 25 OF 42 STATE PROJ. #: 120 -091 -002 a PN N NeD NOTES ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE >< UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. 2 EXISTING EXISTING DOUBLE YELLOW 2 EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKING 2 PAVEMENT (1) 2 PAVEMENT MARKING ¢ MARKING o O L q z U L O J '- cn z z 6 w Z z J - — — — Woudda I e -Ave — — — — — — — -i w H e x z IU- } Q Ax. W cn �, STOP N A z a m� L W .c ALL ear M L(7 EXISTING PAVEMENT W +_ STOP 2 MARKING � 0. zZd L[) Q w PAVEMENT MARKING KEY Z x O CIRCLE -EPDXY p C7 LIQ z cra z Q TRIANGLE - PAINT C7 In I 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM EXISTING AND REMOVALS MATCHL INE M WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW go (BAKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD SPIL 3 PREFORM (GR IN) o^ D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B -BLACK ( )' 80 A � PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM GR IN A ^ N PROPOSED �� ( > EXAMPLE: 4SW - 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)° W �noo y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' SCALE IN FEET O &zNr+ PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY '� ' (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' as 4 ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS V Q% �NE�r,• 4DW 4- 4DW +x = s ,¢p - ^ 4 4DW o3d L - Tl O Ll E e +O Alp O N O 9 e LL OD a° J 4DY / a a b Z e s Z- - - - - - 5= - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5= - - Zgec F 1B' III 11 17' Woodda l e_ Ave- 17' J- - - - - - - - 19, 8* s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = B' 19' 8. - _v_ - 2 U U o � STOP ,� ID � �pz� N oz W I ' 4SW >. w To 4 4SW �� i O l% 0 4SW 4DW 4DW s» v 8 ' m BITS aJW¢ �w °v�iozv~i N + SIJP 0. ¢W€ In } or U-) wao_�p- wr�.o yr o0 c SPECIFIC NOTESs 1O �w�> >¢�¢04^W o " BIKE LANE w CC - z b O1 FURNISH & INSTALL w�000w" o 5. = J z z 0 LL o _a o¢(1 0 O2 REMOVE a 3NV1 3xI9 (ft We Cornell. P.r -9 [DATE: AWN: KAS 9 O SALVAGE & REINSTALL 4SW a d� n rom sr ( INCLUDES D -10) ECKED: KAB o /r' n am se b ROVED: MRA OS 08 12 MATCHL INE M .# x3 -xxx 7 NTR. ENG 00 —X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 ET 26 OF 42 aN $a Mw NOTES ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT , MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN 1NPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL o INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. z W O O z 2 EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKING 2 EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKING z Z O a w w —' � w F J — — — Woodda I e -Ave -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — _z � M a I z CD c o 9L. v7 a� z c\l Ln 0 A 0 d W PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE -EPDXY Q G � f37 Z Z Q TRIANGLE - PAINT C.7 EXISTING AND REMOVALS 1ST DIGIT WIDTH 2ND DIGIT PATTERN 3RD DIGIT COLOR SQUARE - POLY PREFORM (GROUND IN) CA 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW %r® PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' c PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY >d� PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' 80 PREFORM g. y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY �ro m,° o� (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' SCALE IN FEET p -.i .3— PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY C+� (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• mm ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT E-� oC1-E — MARKINGS V 4DW a Z ,S da. �g5ed Vz W w U52,! Z- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - z J Woodda I e Ave IT' - - IT' - - - - - J U B' U F-- H W o ° M r2 + c oiw a NI E N W S J 7 a U 0 4SW 4DW c 4SW 4DW 4SW F_WNOZN z a Z "' p W :r 0.0 v waoa <o� -z o SPECIFIC NOTESi v W < wv w o t+ (D FURNISH & INSTALL p it w�4� =ii a aN +N m. Nm MN A- 0 NOTE& ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE Y UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL 9z - INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. K= US 1 2 EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKING 2 280' EXISTING DOUBLE 1 c YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING ° z END PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL Z p o�eee®e�eon� a, W c.5 vn J — Woo -dda l e /eve — — m d x z o U C neenre�a�eee a. w < °x � A z w p-• W 2 EXISTING SOLID WHITE PAVEMENT MARKING cc � w o O I a dzd PAVEMENT MARKING KEY 0 CIRCLE -EPDXY Csi Z ATRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING AND 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT REMOVALS WIDTH PATTERN 3RD DIGIT COLOR El SQUARE - POLY PREFORM (GROUND IN) 1 4°, 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW `fie PAVEMENT MESSAGE -POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' ° PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4° SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY g n PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4 ' ( ) 1 80 A w i> ° PREFORM A_ ^ ° PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY U) °m vai c LT. BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' ) SCALE IN FEET �"',o PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY r_ � Q Nn (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT 0jl 1 Eti — MARKINGS ^ 4 DW .cs E) O J� 4.. _ Z- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -5'- - - - - - - - - - - - ° v H J IT' Wooddo I e_ Ave _ _ _ _ IT � C � n rou�eneu 5 Q J b o O Ooz, N NWHlz 6 i0O t FE � c 4SW 4DW 4SW _ ao >jwa i F�V1°ZN N T� V I I 3 O 4a�QZF= O WGO 4, N SPECIFIC NOTES ° ��nr ^2� vp co >a�ain�W O OI FURNISH S. INSTALL W ; K � W J = s" wao °oW� o 4 2 REMOVE I a - " MM � S N KITS 9 O3 SALVAGE &REINSTALL � KAB S MRA N 1 LAPPROVED: 05 08 12 X3 -XXX NG 00 -X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 of 42 NOTE: ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL / \ INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. � O 3L CD N N G S j / CD 2 EXISTING YELLOW BROKEN & . 7 O / O / / SOLID PAVEMENT MARKINGS :10 o� QD � r r -r VALLEY VIEW RD r - c r Jk EXISTING AND REMOVALS PROPOSED CD 774 PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1 (SEE SHEET 14) O D I J N u �J. i NF O a u 9 0 S a N O'! Z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY CIRCLE - EPDXY QTRIANGLE - PAINT 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE -POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUNDIN) 4% 8% ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD- SPECIAL 3)• �p PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4• SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING- SPECIAL 4)• PREFORM PAVEMENT ~ (BIKE SYMBOL WITH WITH LANE ARROW)- ��,� PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 7� � PAVEMENT MARKING �p AL I SPEC (SEEISHEET 14) r,6 I 13' _ _ _ _ 13' c_r 12' _ r _T VIEW RD r _p7- 12' SPECIFIC NOTESt O FURNISH & INSTALL (D REMOVE (3 )SALVAGE & REINSTALL N PAVEMENT MARKI SPECIAL 1 (SEE SHEET 14) 245Y I 4BY 4DY r m TURN ARROW ENT MARKINGS \ 7` \ . 74 w \ Y Z L m 13' 4SW EXISTING YELLOW BROKEN & SOLID PAVEMENT MARKINGS 4SW .r 1-s \ I 80 SCALE IN FEET 4BY J 2 STATE PROJ.##: 120- 091 -002 z a z F, x z w C4 � w ~ d w a„ dzd A ...7 �w x � A z ^o m N N N o co co I I N aca� 1� W V ?NE�T7 0 e J! g8y:� in cc W O Z Z W N 0 v ' m a W T W H ?a �ZF o FW V,IC A z I.�.aVayZjS K K K Q 4 F N 0 >aoaL�SW o co KZ;Z yKj�4J? W Q O O O W azaa�o 3 DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 IMP.# X3 —XXX CONTRJ ENG 00 —X SHEET 29 OF 42 aN :o m: N m M11f1 NOTE: ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT N MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE x UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL o INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. 2 EXISTING YELLOW BROKEN & SOLID PAVEMENT MARKINGS cla oc PQ 4 O z i pq as dw cc A 2 LEFT TURN ARROW �� d W PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE - EPDXY Z A z QTRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING AND REMOVALS 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4% 8 ', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW go PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) ,` c D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' A PROPOSED N �p PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) EXAMPLE: 4SW ' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING- SPECIAL 4)• 80 mep ~ (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW • cr m PAVEMENT MESSAGE -EPDXY SCALE IN FEET .3— (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• E, ac nw4 'SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 _ MARKINGS —EXISTING RPAVEMENT ( /NESOT C ey lew VA / (or z Z O W N yl W O Y \ \ �m SJO �t O W N C Z N 2 o y�6. \ 4SW �j'� \�,�q, \ '`,_ 4QUaW� Wao MHz O CZ W~4JZ Ln �� W¢ 0 0 0 w O i�aa�o 8 SPECIFIC NOTES DRAWN: KAS N ° O FURNISH & INSTALL CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA O2 REMOVE DATE: 05/08/12 O3 SALVAGE &REINSTALL IMP.# X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 s"ELI 30 OF 42 z a ry u- co -n m� Nm wl N 6 N vo m� NO MfN NOTE: ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT Y MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE N UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL w INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. w w Q a a � z w 0 > 2 EXISITNG DOUBLE YELLOW c O J PAVEMENT MARKING O o J Q O Z JOTS Y dOlS dOIS cO Z \T/ w 91. z C.7 _ - — — — — — — — — — - W-54TH S-T — — — — Q x z x x w H U pr d E_ O STOP STOP STOP �S��Q z 2 PAVEMENT BROKEN Y 0. Z Q d W PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE -EPDXY � Z A TRIANGLE - PAINT z C!1 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM EXISTING AND REMOVALS WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE © �, B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW `g9 PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' c PROPOSED $y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) A N EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' Cy PREFORM PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY 0 ~ (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)- mL o.O°N° i PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY 80 Cam, (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)' X ° SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 Er eSa ' -EXISTING PAVEMENT SCALE IN FEET V "' Ld > w w �NESOr7 tn z dOTS w w U �°.. 1+1 Z 1 n O CdO 0 0� a 4sw ON Y ► L N l J w J V u —j a Y O m o gas Y wm Co 4Dw a n 4Dw F@] 4SW ^`s == w A. w - - _z J22' 22' W 54TH ST 22' 23 • _j ao E h L i U ~��UZ N ct I Q \ \ 4Dw y\ Y �. -,� I-- a s o v o o O O a n �: �C\��. °w�oiw 4sw 4Dw OTO c Z Qr r }��<aw 4SW 4DW .STOP n m aO rD ,j ( mxLx w� 3 m NO twO JT��P -9 '� wao Zy., L �� >Q�Q113W o aD A �zo�w� o u SPECIFIC NOTES: ` -mm m, 0 DRAWN: KAS (D FURNISH & INSTALL CHECKED: KAB G O REMOVE APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 o O3 SALVAGE & REINSTALL I STATE PROJ. 120- 091 -002 A' 3 a o= mo Np /1 N i r t EXISITNG DOUBLE YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING '11f. �G �Syyq O d01S PROPOSED � Cn 0 -a ►dole, 9 ( <1 �v� r 1 01 SPECIFIC NOTES IO FURNISH & INSTALL 20 REMOVE O SALVAGE & REINSTALL Ld a EXISITNG PAVEMENT MARKING x ao dO1S J a V _ W 54TH ST r_\� PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE - EPDXY QTRIANGLE - PAINT 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT a SQUARE -POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUNDIN) 4", 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW %cg PAVE SYMBOL WITH WITH BLPOLY PPREFORM I (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE B - BLACK ( )" s,» PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)• PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)- PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY .3— (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT — MARKINGS U _N ao 9��o� \i 2T' W 54TH ST Ld �O1S a x LL OV i -1 O J a 2 i � 22' NOTES ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. a 2 80 SCALE IN FEET J Q 2 STATE PROJ. #: 120- 091 -002 DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA 33 OF 42 z ti cn V) M Ld w CS rn z F, J x x z 4 O COW 1 U � � 1141 I CD ca z PQ �w d z � A Q Z Da d A C7 A c z DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA 33 OF 42 ti cn M C j M O m N N N O COW 1 Oi .. r n W is ESpr� ?I1/ ��b Aip �Na J LI Z J IN- 2 U 0 aC o &ZW [q\ G Nwmm 2 1C o ama�wa o F_ W VIO Z(In Z > Q -¢Zw J 4 a W w Z O O \ V >�Ocn N It W) � Z3 W Q O O O W O az7M 0 s DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA 33 OF 42 a N NO N O\ No NOTEI ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE a Y UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL z INPLACE SIGNS ARE SHOWN. W > W EXISITNG Q > 2 PAVEMENT Q Ld MARKING U CD Q Z Z w W z° dOlS W � " n 54th St m CL, J � W = W 54TH ST '~ F 0 'P' c� a O °N o ° za _T) � � w ld a dz Gi A a d � � PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE - EPDXY Z z TRIANGLE -PAINT A � C/] 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT _ _ _ SQUARE - POLY PREFORM EXISTING AND REMOVALS WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4•, 8•, ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW `A'rC PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) • D - DOTTEDIDOUBLE B - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)• c^ PROPOSED >pv PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4• SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)• w PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY °m'� (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' , irIng" PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY BO � z "- '�"' (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• d �+ SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT V MARKINGS SCALE IN FEET LIJ B -'% NESOT > Ld a a atlu W > y =1 m ui Q z V) Lij O^ U U, Q H 59th $t D O /! 1 Z b -S o U .W-. W U Q 1--1 O ^ °O m W " 3 3 gg W M N 4DY \ 51��8 1 d01� Q 8y == w J T Z = sl - _ .•y.: �� W 54TH ST ' i z UC J ~ _ h U ozmm 0 f�1 ~ �wAwi °o "O 0 40W -1 a MOUNTED 3' ABOVE L mw=wl- O GRADE (iYP) �WNOZN Z 0 4SW _yy F °WaZ� C7f - NOTES& COORDINATE BICYCLE PAVEMENT MESSAGE mm J a w 'a 12SW WITH DETECTOR INSTALLATION. PLACE CENTER O 1 v° �_ i o0 c m OF BICYCLE DETECTOR PAVEMENT MESSAGE S -4 6 0 Z m C ON TOP OF THE VISIBLE "PUCK- LIKE" SENSOR. Yla° W3agi ° ow ° O N m =.�zza�� Z NO �� ° -� SPECIFIC NOTES& C g _am-a ° a BICYCLE DETECTOR PAVEMENT DRAWN: KAS 9 MESSAGE ENLARGED FOR VIEWING. © FURNISH & INSTALL CHECKED: KAB O SHEETSVFORNDIMENSIONSDETAiI O REMOVE APPROVED: MRA N DATE: 05 08 12 7 O SALVAGE & REINSTALL IMP.( X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00 -X STATE PROJ. 120- 091 -002 s "E� 34 OF 42 x S C i i i i i a c aNi mo- _ NC Nm: NOTE' ALL EXISTING SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL REMAIN INPLACE Y UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT ALL z INPLACE SIGNS ARE 'SHOWN. W LLI Q Z W F- o Q n H o d O l S 0 m W yf 54th S, p° z = U dOlS m m N Z W - z a, z W 54TH ST z cn E- CD f e aG Z E— C STOP w a cc w `c a z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O C CIRCLE -EPDXY CE3 Z Z A TRIANGLE -PAINT u C] 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM EXISTING AND REMOVALS WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4', B', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW $c9 PAVEMENT MESSAGE -POLY PREFORM (GR IN) D - DOTTED /DOUBLE 8 - BLACK (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD - SPECIAL 3)' oM PROPOSED PAVEMENT MESSAGE - POLY PREFORM (GR IN) A '� EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING - SPECIAL 4)' r-14 PREFORM . A o 0 0, y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY 0.11 (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BIKE LANE ARROW)' o ^m10 PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY 80Z�� (BIKE DETECTOR - SPECIAL 2)• ° SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS 13 -14 EXISTING PAVEMENT aowa�° MARKINGS SCALE IN FEET V 0 ar 9 W Dr�A j > ?O tV Q W 59th St D (D a t 0 o _ I? d` o m Q zs U T d 01 �J Go N N Z �/ T /1 Fy g W 54TH ST Mfg U F- i > o oZZW UZ 1°O, MOUNTED 3' ABOVE a�a �1aJ i - < CL i A 111111 GRADE (TYP) )Tl,1r)QFaZW, 1 1/r CN W� �4Fa ' O U a 0 Z 0 p t S-4 > a f a"z o j TIFLD w � W J= IA KZW 4 10 - Wa000w SPECIFIC NOTESe °' O =anaa�0 I C -B DRAWN: KITS O CHECKED: KAB FURNISH & INSTALL APPROVED: MRA O2 REMOVE DATE. '- 05 08 12 O3 SALVAGE & REINSTALL CONTR. ENG OOXX STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 SHEET 35 of 42 ppo O v N S 6 ' u N AN% TYPE C & D POST ri z z ISER POST (NO SPLICE PERMITTED) LATERAL BRACE 2 -5/6" STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS WITH NYLON INSERT LOCK NUTS PLACED IN TOP AND BOTTOM HOLES. TUB POST 3.5' U POST SPLICE PANEL TYPICAL TYPE C INSTALLATION STAINLESS•. STEEL ;WASHER AND NYLON WASHER (T = &" ,MIN.. I.D. =%" MAX...O.D. = %8' MAXJ- SIGN PANEL POST 5/6" STAINLESS STEEL BOLT WITH NYLON INSERT LOCK NUT. U POST MOUNTING TYPE C SIGNS LATERA BRACE TYPICAL TYPE D INSTALLATION MODIFIED TYPE C INSTALLATION /4 H /4 NOTES: F=�SJz T ama�wa 1. USE 3 LB /FT STUB POSTS,,RISER POSTS, STRINGERS, o TYPE C & D SIGN 4OUQZIJ aW 7 N KNEE BRACES, LATERAL BRACES AND KNEE BRACE wmoaz000 >'QSQVjW STUB POSTS. ALL SHALL CONFORM TO MN /DOT 3401. W;��Waz WZ W 4 a�aa�o a . 2. FOR TYPE D SIGN POSTS LENGTHS AND SPACINGS, DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: MRA t o MRA SEE SIGN DATA SHEET. Z 3. TYPE D SIGN PANELS SHALL BE BOLTED TO STRINGERS AT 24" MAXIMUM -INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TYPE -D STRINGER AND PANEL -JOINT DETAIL (SEE STANDARD SIGNS MANUAL). 4, MOUNTING (PUNCH CODE) FOR .TYPE C SIGN PANELS Lsl y SHALL BE AS INDICATED IN THE STANDARD SIGNS MANUAL d s UNLESS ..OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.. 5. ALL. RISER (VERTICAU U POSTS SHALL BE SPLICED. DRIVEN d STUB POSTS SHALL BE AT LEAST 7'LONG., A 6. USE STAINLESS :STEEL 5/6" BOLTS, WASHERS AND c Z NYLON INSERT LOCK NUTS AS SHOWN FOR ALL GROUND 54 M MOUNTED AND OVERHEAD MOUNTED SIGNS. p`q 7. STAINLESS STEEL WASHER WITH SAME DIMENSIONS Q z SHALL BE PROVIDED- BETWEEN ALL NYLON WASHERS AND p BOLT - HEADS. Cr2 8. BRACING STUBS SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 4" ABOVE GROUND AND EMBEDDED AT LEAST 3 %2'. 9. A -FRAME BRACKET SHALL BE STEEL CONFORMING TO MN /DOT 3306 AND GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /DOT 3394. ,r o 10. COLLARS SHALL BE USED TO SHIM OVERLAYS AND W DEMOUNTABLE LEGEND AWAY FROM PANEL WHERE INTER- cv, m,N- FERENCE WITH BOLT HEADS IS ENCOUNTERED. O 11 MN /DOT 3352.2A5.dd� 11. 2 POST TYPE C SIGNS SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH ao°4 V W AT LEAST ONE LATERAL BRACE. INSTALLATIONS WHERE NEB. THE TOTAL PANEL HEIGHT IS 60" OR MORE .SHALL HAVE TWO LATERAL BRACES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY AT �?t THE QUARTER POINTS. 12.. WHERE 2 SINGLE POST .TYPE C SIGNS ARE INSTALLED _ a. -SIDE BY SIDE, THEY -SHALL BE REINFORCED LATERALLY BY AT LEAST 2 BRACES, BOLTED AT EACH POST.. AND LOCATED, APPROXIMATELY AT THE QUARTER POINTS.__ 13. WHERE 3 OR MORE TYPE C SIGNS ARE INSTALLED SIDE BY. SIDE, THE.V='SHALL.BE REINFORCED LATERALLY BY AT LEAST 2 BRACES, BOLTED AT EACH POST AND POST SECTION.AND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY AT THE QUARTER o POINTS AS SHOWN IN MODIFIED: TYPE C. INSTALLATION. oo2w. V1 yj -WO A STATE PROJ. #: 120- 091 -002 F=�SJz T ama�wa o TYPE C & D SIGN 4OUQZIJ aW 7 N wmoaz000 >'QSQVjW STRUCTURAL DETAILS W;��Waz WZ W 4 a�aa�o a Sheet 1 of 3 DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: MRA APPROVED: MRA A STATE PROJ. #: 120- 091 -002 4 0 3 m L b a u N O °o a N 4 N N..N YfO� �NO NOV nu+x zA" I Cm C177 �� �1171 STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS WITH NYLON INSERT LOCK NUTS IN HOLES CLOSEST TO SPLICE & OUTSIDE HOLES. TWO SECTIONS BUTTED LATERAL BRACE OR STRINGER SPLICE DETAIL (EXPLODED VIEW) VERTICAL POST A —FRAME BRACKET (STEEL MN /DOT 3306 GALVANIZED PER MN /DOT 3394) 5/6" STAINLESS ST BOLTS WITH NYLON INSERT LOCK NUTS BRACKET SECTION A —A 3%2' x 3� /z' SHIM PLATE STAINLESS STEEL WASHER AND NYLON WASHER (T =y3z" MIN., I.D. =%" MAX., O.D. = %B' MAX.) 7 SIGN PANELS / ■1■ STRINGER —5,6" STAINLESS STEEL BOLT WITH NYLON INSERT LOCK NUT SECTION B -B VERTICAL POST .I KNEE BRACE SPLICE 1 5/16" STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS WITH NYLON INSERT LOCK NUTS PLACED NEAR TOP AND BOTTOM HOLES. STRINGER ERTICAL POST g B / i 0 H/z A o /z x H KNEE BRACE k 1 H/2 KNEE BRACE --� (ONE SPLICE REQUIRED) 3" MAX. Y z6° +z° 0.5X = Y ±6" VERTICAL POST II �� I� STUB POST 3 MAX. 4" MAX. 3.5' II (1) �II 3.5' i LATERAL BRACE r,U TYPICAL "A— FRAME" INSTALLATION TYPE "D" SIGNS KNEE BRACE (ONE SPLICE REQUIRED) 26° +z° MAX.4�� MAX. STUB POST (1) 3.5' III y� 3.5' II / J--II TYPICAL "A— FRAME" INSTALLATION TYPE "C" SIGNS TYPICAL MOUNTING (1) OFFSET STUB POST P TOWARD ROADWAY RELATIVE TO VERTICAL POST. ATTACH STUB POST AND KNEE BRACE BACK TO BACK. TYPE C & D SIGN STRUCTURAL DETAILS Sheet 2 of 3 9- d W A z Q N qoo m O zZNH ti voa� 1� W =a a � Z �O 3�q AL a � 3 7 0 0" Z W co IW �UZ CN 7 CN �mwrrc� a a0,Wa o W � C Z N F6Vaw� WN5 W cwixa -ZOO - N r r 0 N m3fQN<'Z O W . WJZ to _ Z Z K W O - mm aa o a DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: MRA APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 STATE PROJ. #: 120- 091 —STATE 120 - 091- 002�SHEET 37 OF 4237 OF 42 0 19 N W O O 0 N aj NON 'NON .1 -\- nmx R6 -1, Rl -1 & (R6 -3 OR R6 -3a) MOUNTING PUNCHING FOR R6- 1(48" x18") & R1- 2(36" x36" x36" ) k_9-�,94 I 1 O O I I PUNCHING FOR R6- 1(36 "x12 ") PUNCHING FOR R6- 1(48" x18" ) "�E -12" + 91, 12 9.. 0 O ( 0 6" 9.. O O 6" 10 O 3" O O 9' O V O PUNCHING FOR R6- 1(48" x18") & R1- 2(36" x36" x36" ) k_9-�,94 I 1 O O I I PUNCHING FOR R6- 1(36 "x12 ") PUNCHING FOR R6- 1(48" x18" ) PUNCHING FOR R6 -3 OR R6 -3a(30 "x24 ") I I I - ED - ED 611 I � I 6, � O- -( I I 48" T 36" 36" 1 PUNCHING FOR R2 -4b SPEED LIMIT I � I o- I -o 7 C- 96" — rt T 12" _�_CE 6" A_ (M3 -IA, M3 -2A, M3 -3A OR M3 -4A) [30" 45" 1 AND M1 -1 (45"x36" OR 36"x36111 ( PUNCHING M2 -1A [21" x15" I OR (M3 -lA, M3 -2A, M3 -3A OR M3 -4A) [24" x12" I AND M1 -6 [24 "x24 "I AND (M5 -lA, M5 -2A, M6 -IA, MG -2A, M6 -3A M6 -4A, MG -5A OR M6 -6A) [21" x15" 1 PUNCHING (W1 -1, W1 -2, W1 -3, W1 -4 OR W1 -5) & W13 -1 MOUNTING 9-I H w A z ZZ "�E -12" �-12" 12 9.. O ( %fa�,, w JQ MM 9.. O O 10 PUNCHING FOR R6 -3 OR R6 -3a(30 "x24 ") I I I - ED - ED 611 I � I 6, � O- -( I I 48" T 36" 36" 1 PUNCHING FOR R2 -4b SPEED LIMIT I � I o- I -o 7 C- 96" — rt T 12" _�_CE 6" A_ (M3 -IA, M3 -2A, M3 -3A OR M3 -4A) [30" 45" 1 AND M1 -1 (45"x36" OR 36"x36111 ( PUNCHING M2 -1A [21" x15" I OR (M3 -lA, M3 -2A, M3 -3A OR M3 -4A) [24" x12" I AND M1 -6 [24 "x24 "I AND (M5 -lA, M5 -2A, M6 -IA, MG -2A, M6 -3A M6 -4A, MG -5A OR M6 -6A) [21" x15" 1 PUNCHING (W1 -1, W1 -2, W1 -3, W1 -4 OR W1 -5) & W13 -1 MOUNTING 9-I H w A z ZZ Sheet 3 of 3 DATE: 05/08/12 IMP.#' CONTSTATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 SHEET �-12" q N %fa�,, w JQ MM 10 o V 12" 12" I I (M3 -1, M3 -IA, M3 -2, M3 -2A, M3 -3, M3 -3A M3 -4 OR mA. a M3 -4A) [30" x15" I AND (Ml -4 OR M1 -5A) [36" x36" 1 O Z W f, s2ws a PUNCHING a a�WF o � °wvoiozv � Z,., 4a W 4 i °o TYPE C & D SIGN N r H 0 N ra2a1N vz O W40°0W2 =JZ2� STRUCTURAL DETAILS KAS CHECKED: MRA APPROVED: MRA Sheet 3 of 3 DATE: 05/08/12 IMP.#' CONTSTATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 SHEET SPECIAL A BIKE ROUTE TYPE "C" SIGNS WITH SINGLE POST PLOICHINC POST ELEVATION rL Sle BOLT STRINGER - 2.3" x 6.7' rl /e BAR 3■ N INN/DOT SIGN FACE OR STRINGER L. U -BOLT. NUTS AND LOCK WASHHRS TURAL STEEL - 4"OT 33911 DETAIL A -"V,x (C; It �oN N r co —q o N r 4---4--- e--4 3.7 K 4.6 x 3.7 > 3.1 x 5.8 x 3.1 > s < 12 No border, Green; Arrow Custom - 4.0" 90° White; [BIKE] White C. W [ROUTE] White C 339 spacing; 9 SPECIAL B; LEFT ARROWN WITH BIKE ROUTE a0 SPECIAL C; RIGHT ARROW WITH BIKE ROUTE NN Nm O SPECIAL D; DOUBLE ARROWS WITH BIKE ROUTE / MIN% TYPE 90' SIG.15 AITH 2-POST PUNCHING ELEVATION / _j L3 3 0 x c3■ :3'1x, X11 yr TYP. Ys" SOLT.LOCK WASHER AND NUT. DETAIL A STRINGER ALTERNATES SPECIAL E r., l: 8.8 6.4 3 'E 18 1.8 8.5 >1.2< 3.8 24 2.0" Radius, No border, White on Green; [EDINA] B; Rectangle Black; [SHARES THE ROAD] B; • 8.8 5.7 r 1.8 > N o i �tq CNI —z o r VIEW A -A FACE OETAIL A NOTES. 1. FOR BACK TO BACK MOUNTINGS. ROTATE STRINGERS FOR ONE PANTL 1W FROM WHAT IS SHOWN SUCH THAT PANELS CAN BE MOUNTED AT SAME ELEVATION. 2. DETAIL A STRINGER MAY BE ONE OF THE THREE DESIGNS DETAILED OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /DOT 3306 AND GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /007 3394. FASTENERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /DOT 3391.28 AND SHALL BE GALVANIZED EITHER BY THE HOT -DIP PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A153. OR BY THE MECHANICAL PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 8695.CLASS 50 OR GREATER. TYPE C SIGNS MOUNTED ON 0- POSTS. OH SIGN POSTS OR SIGNAL STANDARDS ENDS AT H W Y 62 SPECIAL F 30 X 12, BLACK ON WHITE USED IN SIGN ASSEMBLY C -10 SPECIAL G ROUNDABOUT FISH HOOK 24 X 30, BLACK ON WHITE USED IN SIGN ASSEMBLY S -4 STATE PROJ J: 120- 091 -002 v z ,T., ur Gii I C_> E-• O � w �zaz � d A d d W Z GQ7 Ed-' � 17O A z cs C.7 a� r `cz� N ao CL � m�M o , O voal.° V 2 3+D AlA adi. 0 OZVWIR' NWmWO am(L o �WNOZA >. a U a = 2 FW 'Wf c0WiaO-i °1�o m ;� =Nyz O W CHW J? W) W¢ O 0,2 O mM<m 0 a DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KA8 APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 39 of 42 1 IL w d, ]�vA1L A 1 � A 4-VAR. , r-- -�,-- ---- -_a --- +� J ' 1 1 L- -- ----- / 1 1 1 STRINGERS 1 i i 1 1 STRINGERS , 1 1 1 1 1 , , T T L A ' 1 I L A 1 1 TYPE "C" SIGNS WITH SINGLE POST PLOICHINC POST ELEVATION rL Sle BOLT STRINGER - 2.3" x 6.7' rl /e BAR 3■ N INN/DOT SIGN FACE OR STRINGER L. U -BOLT. NUTS AND LOCK WASHHRS TURAL STEEL - 4"OT 33911 DETAIL A -"V,x (C; It �oN N r co —q o N r 4---4--- e--4 3.7 K 4.6 x 3.7 > 3.1 x 5.8 x 3.1 > s < 12 No border, Green; Arrow Custom - 4.0" 90° White; [BIKE] White C. W [ROUTE] White C 339 spacing; 9 SPECIAL B; LEFT ARROWN WITH BIKE ROUTE a0 SPECIAL C; RIGHT ARROW WITH BIKE ROUTE NN Nm O SPECIAL D; DOUBLE ARROWS WITH BIKE ROUTE / MIN% TYPE 90' SIG.15 AITH 2-POST PUNCHING ELEVATION / _j L3 3 0 x c3■ :3'1x, X11 yr TYP. Ys" SOLT.LOCK WASHER AND NUT. DETAIL A STRINGER ALTERNATES SPECIAL E r., l: 8.8 6.4 3 'E 18 1.8 8.5 >1.2< 3.8 24 2.0" Radius, No border, White on Green; [EDINA] B; Rectangle Black; [SHARES THE ROAD] B; • 8.8 5.7 r 1.8 > N o i �tq CNI —z o r VIEW A -A FACE OETAIL A NOTES. 1. FOR BACK TO BACK MOUNTINGS. ROTATE STRINGERS FOR ONE PANTL 1W FROM WHAT IS SHOWN SUCH THAT PANELS CAN BE MOUNTED AT SAME ELEVATION. 2. DETAIL A STRINGER MAY BE ONE OF THE THREE DESIGNS DETAILED OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /DOT 3306 AND GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /007 3394. FASTENERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /DOT 3391.28 AND SHALL BE GALVANIZED EITHER BY THE HOT -DIP PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A153. OR BY THE MECHANICAL PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 8695.CLASS 50 OR GREATER. TYPE C SIGNS MOUNTED ON 0- POSTS. OH SIGN POSTS OR SIGNAL STANDARDS ENDS AT H W Y 62 SPECIAL F 30 X 12, BLACK ON WHITE USED IN SIGN ASSEMBLY C -10 SPECIAL G ROUNDABOUT FISH HOOK 24 X 30, BLACK ON WHITE USED IN SIGN ASSEMBLY S -4 STATE PROJ J: 120- 091 -002 v z ,T., ur Gii I C_> E-• O � w �zaz � d A d d W Z GQ7 Ed-' � 17O A z cs C.7 a� r `cz� N ao CL � m�M o , O voal.° V 2 3+D AlA adi. 0 OZVWIR' NWmWO am(L o �WNOZA >. a U a = 2 FW 'Wf c0WiaO-i °1�o m ;� =Nyz O W CHW J? W) W¢ O 0,2 O mM<m 0 a DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KA8 APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 39 of 42 I. 00 N i u N W O i 0 $o= .NNo NOV rnNx 2-5 Q 56 �36�54 �1 ��86 ,2192.�:l2p„�56119,tg��1 '!3a'15p 91'"+ay Lake Cornelia Park I 5 2• O 2 ,. 9 3p. 9 1 . 4 9 O o 9 A O��,,y,y3 Lq Wooddale Ave Rut -01 11 2.6- L- 2-L-2 -+L -5.31 2»1 5.7- 1 2 1 1D.2 1 2 1 5.6 1 26 41 .52.6 -4-2-L-2 - L -- 5.3----L-2-J 1.8 L- 2- L- 5.8-- +L- 2-L2.5 1 14 0. L 41 S 13 J_ 4.8- --'L-2 �L 9.2 i 13 D. W 54th St A- 2.6- 1- 2--L- 2 -L -5.3 -L 2- L- -5.7 -2-L 10.2 1 2 - -5.6 1 Z6 L 41 1 .52.8-1-2 -L-2 -1 5.3 L21 115 1. 2� -4.6 -�1 1 0. L 41 I .528- L2 -L2 1 5.3 L -2 -J 1.8 L-2 1 6- 1- -2-1-2S -L 13.8 0. 42 D-1; 1.5" Radius, OS" Border, White on Green; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 90'; Symbol RGO25: [Lake Cornelia Park] D; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 901; Symbol RGO25: ]Woodtlale Ave ] D; Arrow Custom - 3.0. 90% Symbol RGO25: [W 541h SU D; 2 6 'Sit, 11319�'pVT' '761'259 I J 4D ft W 70th St I � N �2.3�2 -�2 -L 5.3- �2 -J 1.7 L-2 1 5.9- 1 2--L-2.5-L2.31 30 I D-2•, 1.5' Radlus, 0.5' Border, While on Green; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 90% Symbol RGD25: [W 70th St] D; D-3; 1.5' Radius. 0.5' Border, Whits on Green; rrow A Custom - 3.0. 100'; Symbol RG025; [W 64th SII D; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 180'; Symbol RG025; (W 44th St ) D; [USE BRIDGE) D; 25 95 "39'1SA, 1X199 "05 'S'.5 A'25921929'1q%1 Q Lake Cornelia 939'SSA 31•,x$ Park 2' S' `.y9 111154,tk.�yp ,�r6,t1:L Q W 70th St 13p 1A6 106 1p6 211 ,�,3 ,1p0 ,(15 USE BRIDGE 2.6- L- 2-L-2 -+L -5.31 2»1 5.7- 1 2 1 1D.2 1 2 1 5.6 1 26 41 .52.6 -4-2-L-2 - L -- 5.3----L-2-J 1.8 L- 2- L- 5.8-- +L- 2-L2.5 1 14 0. L 41 S 13 J_ 4.8- --'L-2 �L 9.2 i 13 D. D-0: 15' Radius, 0.5' Border, White on Green; Arrow Custom - 30 90'; Symbol RGO25; [lake Comella Perk] D; Arrow Custom - III" 90'; Symbol RG025; [W 70th St ] D; [USE BRIDGE] D: Db; 1.5' Radius, 05' Border, White on Green; Arrow Custom - 3.0" 90'; Symbol RGO25: [W 54th SI) D; Arm- Custom - 3.0' 90'; Symbol RGD25; [W 44th St ] D; z.6- L- 2 -L-2 -1 5.3-1-2 -1 5.7 -1 2 1 1D.2 1 2 1 5.6 1 26 -, L 41 I .52.6 -L2--L2 1 5.3 L -2-J 1.8 L- 2-"L- 5.8- +L -2-L25 rL 14 0. 42 D-6; 1.5' Radius, 0.5' Border, White on Green; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 90': Symbol RGO25: [Lake Cornelia Park] D; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 90'; Symbol RGO25: [W 70th St ] D; 'i 1 ,sq1 ,9A�0 ,L�q_y 293,t9p � cq Q ( W 44th St w �SFranceAv� L -2-1 -2 1 5.3 L -2-I 1.71-2 1- 5.9 1 2-1-25 1 7.2 35 1 �5.3- �L2 -J 1.3L- 2- ,L- 8.4�L -2 32 -L-2�1 3�1 3.4 0. D-7; 1.5" Radius, OS" Border, White on Green; Arrow Custom - 3.(r 90': Symbol RGO25: [W 44th St] D: Symbol RG025: IS France Av ] D; Arrow Custom - 3.0" 0': � Z/� pg t � �39�y4 k1 ,�p� 2kg 2n'32A�.6021621 3393591 �2 rJ 5 /IL]I \U��t�(JQv`i Lake Cornelia Park 41 N -NN -col 2• O 150 ,11'5e 2� y6 ,�?,y12 -Dial 5 W 70th St S France Av N 4 Y� N 4 N 4 tV L.,. m� DN N G� 2-J 1.8 L- 2- L- -5.8 -1- 2-12.5 L 14 0. L 41 I •5261 3- l-2 -5.3 1 2- DIAL -2-�L 8.31 2 -L-3.2 L -10.2 0. 42 0.8; 1.5' Radius, 0.5' Border, White on Green; Arrow Custom - 3.D' 90': Symbol RGO25; [Lake ComeOa Park) 0; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 90'; Symbol RG025: [W 7001 St ] D; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 180'; Symbol RGO25; IS France Av) D; It] W44thS I N �2.3-L-2- 'L -2 5.31 2-J 1.7 L- 2 5.9 -r1 2-L-2.5-L2.3 30 I 0.9; 1.5" Radius, 0.5' Border, White on Green; Arrow Custom - 3.0" 90'; Symbol RG025; [W 44th St] D; trlir, 1.0- Remus, 0.5- Border. White on Green; Arrow Custom - 3A' 180'; Symbol RGO25; ]Lake Cornelia Park] D; Arrow Custom - 3.0' 180'; Symbol RGO25; [W 70th St ] D; Symbol RGO25; [W 44th St) D; Arrow Custom - 3.0" 0'; STATE PROJ. #: 120- 091 -002 z � � w z � H C) 1Y a z W _x z as z s� Q q ' N W ]MOO 04 C I M '- " 0 Cc O zNrV �gm� U1 L o � nWaW V �NE50 >� 3 ; Z 3 Al 3 °06 0 o 'S zw cc �s -nR d mwrorW Q a> d � °w v=ioz?N >aHQzF For Lz Q4 Q [� .Ma QoI- ix ZZi Q: F- ow J? un WQOOOWg =�zzrc � DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/12 �'RLi l 40 GF 42 0 6 N ON P\ Nm Y W O C ISN GJ m Q O Z SENSYS ACCESS POINT 20 FT MOUNTING HEIGHT %] — d I 4 a I I � � W O G A I O pq a d O a, z CD v] I d I Z I C I I I I C12 I I NOTESs I Q I 1. BAND ACCESS POINT TO POLE. 2. TAP & THREAD POLE. p ^ A o N W I �M;oo °m I 3. PROVIDE 1/2" SEALTIGHT CONDUIT FROM POLE TO ACCESS POINT. p m o I �ZNN mm I V I I b - a I CONTINUOUS CAT -5 CABLE (TO CABINET) K p OZZw N o o O N�5�0 oo a 1-(-r S NOTE: NO SCALEmWrwk O apW �WO» ZVH I In Z N a Z= 7 u a W W � ap_ UN m = >`-00N mim Z 00 O N O 2w K W WE w G V SENSYS ACCESS POINT MOUNTING DETAIL �<a o a W DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB 0 APPROVED: MRA 0 N DATE: 05 08 12 N IMP.{ X3 -XXX 0 CONTR. ENG 00 -X 41 of 42 x STATE PROJ. : 120- 091 -002 SHEET M NOTE: TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM INSTALLED BY HENNEPIN COUNTY 10/94 CABLE LEGEND SIGNAL 8 A: 12/C #12 • B: 5 /C #12 O- C: 3/C #12 °1 D: 2/C #10 W /GRD o E: 3/C #10 V / /GRD N F: 2 /C# 14 SI-I 3 G: 5OPR,#19 H: 25PR #19 o I: 18PR #19 J: 12PR,#19 d K: 3PR #19 = T: 2/C #12 SH N pW S °o � N 6N/ 00� .NO N0 n,n x 1994 3" RSC(2- A,2 -T) 1994 3" RSC(2- A,4. -T) 43.5' ,I i y 0 s w w i Z z w 0 } U 3.0' 6.0' ! j 5345 I FL C? 1.5' _ W 54th ST ( - 40.0' D4 -2s ! I 1 .. ............. .... __ ............... 1994 1 1/2" RSC(2 -T) - a NO Nr - ........_........; �.- - -� f I 3" SC(2- A,2 -T) —= �. 5354 V �. 1994 1 i ' CABLE LEGEND SIGNAL 8 A: 12/C #12 • B: 5 /C #12 O- C: 3/C #12 °1 D: 2/C #10 W /GRD o E: 3/C #10 V / /GRD N F: 2 /C# 14 SI-I 3 G: 5OPR,#19 H: 25PR #19 o I: 18PR #19 J: 12PR,#19 d K: 3PR #19 = T: 2/C #12 SH N pW S °o � N 6N/ 00� .NO N0 n,n x 1994 3" RSC(2- A,2 -T) 1994 3" RSC(2- A,4. -T) 43.5' ,I i y 0 s w w i Z z w 0 } U 3.0' 6.0' ! j 5345 I FL C? 1.5' _ W 54th ST ( - 40.0' D4 -2s ! I 1 .. ............. .... __ ............... i 5349 , i 5353 I F &I ACCESS POINT LOOP DETECTOR CHART VEH SIGNAL PHASE DESIGNATION NO I1 il 1994 3" SC(2- A,2 -T) —= �. F &I BD4 -2 �. 1994 1 1/2" RSC(1- N,2 -0) ' 04 -2 1 1 1994 3 1/2" RSC 4 -A,7 -T INPLACE - ti ' 1994 1 1/21' RSC(1- N,2 -0) 2' FROM STOP BAR 8'FROM CURB FACE PHASE 4 BD4 -2 1 -3x3 (DA) (1) 2'FROM STOP BAR 10'FROM CURB FACE CORE DRILL 5400 ' (n I i ` Q CABLE LEGEND - j - -'-' -- ' I W I U LIGHTS I Z L: 1/C #1/0 ; Q� M: 1/C #2 _ LL- N: 1/C#4 0: 1/C #6 --- ' 44.0' 0: 2/C#110 W /GRD R: 3/C #10 W /GRD ; S: i /C #10 D L _j L _, i 5349 , i 5353 I F &I ACCESS POINT LOOP DETECTOR CHART VEH SIGNAL PHASE DESIGNATION NO FUNCTION1 LOCATION INSTALLATION PHASE 4 D4 -1 3 -6x10 (1) INPLACE INPLACE PHASE 4 04 -2 3 -6x10 (1) INPLACE INPLACE PHASE 4 BD4 -1 1 -3x3 (DA) (1) 2' FROM STOP BAR 8'FROM CURB FACE CORE DRILL PHASE 4 BD4 -2 1 -3x3 (DA) (1) 2'FROM STOP BAR 10'FROM CURB FACE CORE DRILL (1) CALL AND EXTEND DA - DETECTOR AREA INPLACEe 1994 3" RSC(2- A,2- S,2 -T) F &I: 1 -CAT -5 CABLE INPLACEe 1994 3" RSC(2- A,2- S,3 -T) F &Ic 1 -CAT -5 CABLE -- - - - -- - - ----- - -- - �_ -- J- �- I D4 -1 i L J L J F &I BD4 -1 i 1 i I I 1 I •, to L 16 5.5' i:::_ O 1994 3" RSC(2- A,2 -T) INPLACE: 1994 3 1/2" RSC(4- A,2- S,5 -T) F &I: 1 -CAT -5 CABLE INPLACEe 1994 3 1/2" RSC(4- A,2- -S,7 -T) F&I: I -CAT -5 CABLE INPLACEe _...._.......,...._ 1994 3 1/2" RSC(4- A,2- S,7 -T) F &I: I -CAT -5 CABLE _- ... ... . ... ...I . .. .. .... ... --- _ --- -_. 1994 1 1/2" RSC(2 - -T) Ol INSTALL SENSYS SENSORS (SEE DETECTOR CHART) O2 INSTALL WIRELESS SENSYS ACCESS POINT ON LUMINAIRE EXTENSION. INSTALL CAT -5 CABLE TO CABINET. SEE NOTE 3. O3 INPLACE CABINET: F &I: SENSYS CONTACT CLOSURE CARD (NEMA TS1 -RACK MOUNTED) SENSYS ACCESS BOX NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS ARE INPLACE AND SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED AS F &I (FURNISH AND INSTALL). 2. WIRELESS SENSORS BD4 -1 AND BD4 -2 SHALL BE F &I BY CONTRACTOR. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. EXACT LOCATION SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY ENGINEER. 3. WIRELESS ACCESS POINT SHALL BE INSTALLED ON LUMINAIRE EXTENSION (20 FEET HEIGHT), FACE SOUTH AND A CAT -5 CABLE SHALL RUN FROM THE ACCESS POINT TO THE CONTROLLER CABINET. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE EXISTING INPLACE LOOP DETECTORS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF WIRELESS SENSORS BD4 -I AND BD4 -2. LOCATION OF BD4 -1 AND 804 -2 MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID INPLACE LOOP DETECTORS. STATE PROJ. #: 120- 091 -002 E— CO3 7 w °mow a U C%] z Z CO3 CO3 A Z C.7 O d U2 w CA U3 W E- E Lo =�1-- q it N ^o "V m s 4 ! o,,tN(r 00 m � eoaLL � 3 0 NWNUZ Do r��s» v ama�Q F- ow R0 z g W � FWW Wx u mI m o w <Zl K=W�4J? m Zzw lei _aoaa�o CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 05/08/1 42 OF 42 If SEGMENT 2A - OPTION 2 - ADVISORY LANES (54" AVE - FRANCE AVE TO MINNEHAHA CREEK) 40 SCALE IN FEET EDINA BIKE ROUTES Alliant Engineering EXHIBIT 3 SEGMENT 2A - OPTION2 - AD VISOR Y LANES 54' A VE - FRANCE A VE TO MINNEHAHA CREEK AGENDA ITEM VI. B. Susan Howl Dear City Council Members: am writing today in opposition of the proposed TLC Bike Boulevard Project. I have also attached a petition signed by 110 residents and neighbors who join me in opposing the project including 64 residents living on the proposed route and our former mayor Denny Maetzold. These signatures were collected in just a few hours over the past week. In collecting these signatures I approached all 140 homes on Wooddale between 50`h Street and Valley View Road to see if they were aware of the project and how they felt about it. Of the 73 residents that were home; 60 oppose the project and signed the petition (82 %), 8 want to learn more about the project (11 %), 4 don't care (6 %), and 1 supports the project (1 %). Most of these residents were aware of the project, but were not aware of the details. When hearing the details, the most common response was, "this is crazy." These residents are concerned with safety, removal of the center stripe, width of the lanes, speed, and the negligence of current bikers in obeying traffic laws (among other concerns.) Based on this sample there is not a lot of support for this project. Please, put the interests of our residents most affected by the proposed project (and those who drive the route) above the interests of the TLC and vote against the project. Thank you, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Avenue RESIDENT PETITION OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project We, the undersigned, hereby: 1) OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project as recommended by Wayne D. Houle in his April 19, 2012 report to the Edina Transportation Commission, and 2) Call on the Edina City Council to vote AGAINST the TLC Bike Boulevard Project. J I Y Name Address Signature Date 1 p rAun.+P-.4ver _ sIfII Z 2 II(rJJ �z S S 3 %1J V� a YWI65 DCe INae Z q A y C - SS/ 6 " v �� o4Ls 6v �, A' . ti� 2-- ii r ,i1�� 1E% �W (,41 i 9 10� 111 -7- lz riY ,�•Q Vr ����1 YV�% •�i . 1° I1v� �/ �.. %E�t G i ',� 1' � ?.. 13 1/� , =f 01L F- ;�t�ti- f�L ✓lam' r �r7, Z. l.4 'G:G Lo 7 D17i,/; t L-- 1 "`. t 1 17 14 ,(r;,f �ti.. ���� �(�4. Q ` �� 3 V- �..J:..J :� .I.L_.�•C' 18 Cl' 19 l� i:' `iJ f• 1 , 1� 7 ° JUr1 L ?0 /l: 1 k : n zl �i%.: r ' e 4 22 ?j J) 1 ! �zG 23 iM � � �� ' v`tr �? � �; 1�� �t � I I L 24 M J6qJ3 AM 25 4. "4)S( Y A RESIDENT PETITION OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project We, the undersigned, hereby: 1) OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project as recommended by Wayne D. Houle in his April 19, 2012 report to the Edina Transportation Commission, and 2) Call on the Edina City Council to vote AGAINST the TLC Bike Boulevard Project, M Name Address Signature Date 1 2 Get L Sac- Y,),.,,k I, 3 ) & J A) AG f, b, 11"A'11(lh Z_ 51 Vllt-;' Fl� L"9 41 4, 4, S4 a4 i4)00LYCIOZ 4 9 8 8 &)CCX4'106' Aw 15 l0 L /I't 131 P&rku w %C A �,J (&J(— 16 e,ve De Z- 17� U11-4 18 ox A u 15 of Av-t 19 T�'V A1,4, 20 a qa't I,. 7k 'Y/ 21 i J irk ,,c 2 2,11 re e A-v la 24 1:33 25 \'JJ i . / M RESIDENT PETITION OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project We, the undersigned, hereby: ci�c�---PP-O—S;)ha TLC Bike Boulevard Project as recommended by Wayne D. Houle in his April 19, 2012 rrOort to the Edina Transportation Commission, and 2) Call on the Edina City Council to vote AGAINST the TLC Bike Boulevard Project. rl(Z- Name Address Signature Date 1 t 23 % La. 2 �..1.. 52 � 3 w td;ir � IS% I h7- 3 �T, � �� h 1,. 1 �� �- 5 �J -AIAJ C1 -e_ 59 Vii% 4LJcOc,)dw, i/ ,•r•''✓�� �-i "� 5J% �:t-.. 7 �_� •, l...X r�'c� Z.� LzJ ✓elf "� % r i/ 9 I(1.. ..1,w1v"ewl > �fc� cl( (C � 10 � a i 11 , n ✓� 44 h d C 0 /v L' irldG c'1.,: .� Zw 13 a $L1 SC_ ► I 14�N G,fJt V�v rh��b ti I1� s )� ►'�S 16> 17 ✓ Cl 2. i r� 2 vt `I G' (.t�V 0 CIC14 18 .19 Q1� ��. n��n,}�S nr J�6 W,.1,1. Ik��S. ��6 /!Z 20 Ike. ` W. kA� 21 Fj LUW) `j i �b 22 l-1� �. 1114- 23 P yi±Zl C1UV)�IfiLr I 24 S \ kPIL e • Ii "P— 25 C ti WV's. rl(Z- RESIDENT PETITION OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project We, the undersigned, hereby: 1) OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project as recommended by Wayne D. Houle in his April 19, 2012 report to the Edina Transportation Commission, and 2) Call on the Edina City Council to vote AGAINST the TLC Bike Boulevard Project. U Name Address Signatur Date 1 ' I ti 11 `�1 �Q — 2 liolff h At __-- iA 4,,1 r 4 6 ` v ! • 5� v CIL. 14 s 5b va �,,.��; v' 9 i� rL- r, a et NJ e 10 1 !` ••i. ., � �i1��0:����v I7w`- �fi•��G�i � 5- 1!- Id 12z� 13 14 f v, �2 15 1 OSS iL'1 % 16 t ,l< 17 ..z 5'3 t +v I�.,�, '� . � ' '~"� --�... S' r 2 •I.c 18 19 i Rif `t ,21 It4:5l16 ' 310 qAL t r , /� +v{ ILL !( slZltiilL 20 -1 AC(a Mae-42-0d O 22 �, tJ �: S- lI 23 N.: N z4 2 U RESIDENT PETITION OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project We, the undersigned, hereby: 1) OPPOSE the TLC Bike Boulevard Project as recommended by Wayne D. Houle in his April 19, 2012 report to the Edina Transportation Commission, and 2) Call on the Edina City Council to vote AGAINST the TLC Bike Boulevard Project. Name Address Signature. Date 2 `N-7 61 U' W T o 3 J S�j 14 h o a- 4 4 ✓L ! my " 'aG .�� Z 5 c b u i� to /. b s ,� -V' 1.0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS April 19, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass,. Braden, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Sehweiger, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Thompson approving the revised "meeting'agenda — moving . �,��� ., _. item 1A. Election of Chair and Vice Chair to after Approval of =;Minutes: All voted ave: Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR"MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16x,2012. Motion Was made by member Nelson and seconded by Fnember Braden to lDbr.ove. the minutes. All voted ave. Motion`carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 152012 Motion was made by member Thompson andaseconded by member>I_aF.orce to approve the< minutes. All voted ave. 'df Motion carried.',�*� ELECTION OF CHAIR ��'1 Member Thompson thanked outgoing, chair .Janovy ; fo:r sernn19%,"i the chair „and nominated member Nelson. Member Nelson accepted the” nominat Theref being nofother. nomination, me' er LaForce motioned to close the nomination and approve mernber{Nelson amthe chair and the motiom was seconded by member Bass. All voted aye. Motion carried. Chair Nelson thanke�����ttgoing chair�Ja:novynfocr ;fir service and opened up for election of vice - chair. Member Janovy �. nominated memb� �B,ass andrt�hyi�s }was se��yo�nded by member Thompson. Member Bass accepted the nomination. There being no other /,, nomination, membbrr�Laforc motioned to ;close the nomination :and approve member Bass as the vice chair and the motion was seconded Rmember`Thompson. All voted aye. Motion carried: COMMUNITY COMMENT:, None. rd�� Andrew Kasid, 5401 Wooddale Avenue, :: 42 year resident; said he has .seen the TLC Bike. Blvd` plan and requested consideration of parking n e f. neighbgs'and pedestrian safety. He asked that some parking be maintained on 54tH between Wooddale and Kellogg a said ti.6yve had issues with drivers not stopping at the intersection at 54 and Wooddale and have had police paom time to time and if parking is eliminated it would be a traffic concern for monitoring. <� Eileen Supple,..7332 West Shore Drive, said she is speaking as a resident and a member of the Edina Community Lutheran Church. (A letter was distributed to the' ETC from the church.) She said they are excited about the bike path because they have a lot of bikers in the congregation, including a pastor who is a commuting cyclist but they are concerned with losing on- street parking that they have relied on for 64 years. She said they have avoided adding parking and does not want to add more surface that would cause run -off into the creek. She encouraged the ETC to look at share the road between France and Wooddale or to some other point to allow on- street parking. 1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS TLC Bike Boulevard Project Presentation Mr. Houle said Mr. Mike Anderson, traffic engineer, with Alliant Engineering will be giving the presentation and explaining staff's recommendation, and that Mr. Steve Clark with TLC is also in attendance and available to answer questions. Mr. Houle said an informational meeting was held on April 12. (A plan set was distributed to the ETC.) Mr. Anderson said the project limits have change since the February 16 meeting. He said the new Phase I project limits include Wooddale Avenue, 54th Street, Valley View Road and a southern portion of Wooddale Avenue connecting to W. 70th Street. The route will connect to bike facility on 44th Street, 70th Street and future bikeway that city of Minneapolis has planned for Zenith Avenue. Phase II was originally part of this grant but was eliminated due to construction cost and Phase I was extended down Wooddale Avenue over the pedestrian bridge connect to 70th Street via Southdale Road and Cornelia Drive. The tentative schedule include City Council public .hearing on May 15, submittal to State Aid early May with construction starting end of August and completion end of,Septeber. Mr. Anderson said the objective of the project is to prc bicycling and improve safety for cyclists and, while the goa or more, the challenge is meeting the specific design sta,di also adhering to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffii from MnDOT, however, two Requests to Experiment are Road treatments are as follow: 54th Street from France Avenue to Zenith Avenui pavement message, share the lane roadway sign the stop signs at Beard and Drew Avenues. 54th Street from Minnehaha the south side and no park mornings only. A variance i Removal of stop signsA; ,J)JIiy 54th from We with removal Wooddale Avenue fr6 Experiment because th bn= 'street bicycjb,facility that will encourage increased ave dedicated }'Tangs for roadway with vehicles of 2000 for the mostly State Aid roads governed by MnDOT and trol Devices (MMUTCD.). He said no variance is required red frorr� the Federal HigfW�ay Administration (FHWA). Yr ». r i, ,,r,+rr re the road designated by a bike boulevard is circles and a recommendation to remove ?d bike lanes with on- street parking on ff is consid'e'ring a variance to have parking on Sunday only 16 ft. of space and 19 ft. is required for parking. )js is currently being studied. r and the recommendation is dedicated bike lanes recommendation is advisory lane and an FHWA Request to .Would be using 41 shed line instead of a solid line. I/. ,lr�rfr,�i th Southern connection - Wood ale- venue�to 70 Street: the route is Wooddale Avenue over the pedestrian bridge to r ,+ Southdale Road to 68th Street to r "Corgi efia���ive to 70 th Street. Cyclists would be guided by marked signs only. Member La Force asked if the existing bridge ould remain in place. Mr. Houle said staff is working with MnDOT to replace the pedestrian bridge over TH62 in the near future, including the ramps, but in the meantime there is a u- channel to assist with getting bikes up and down the bridge. Member lyer said in this area it is a missed opportunity to combine with Safe Routes to School to connect to Cornelia Elementary. Mr. Houle said the project ends here because of limited funds and that he is working with Alliant on a design plan for when additional funding becomes available. Member Janovy said this is a good solution given the available funding and a plan to finish in the 2nd phase. Valley View Road from Wooddale Avenue to 62nd Street: project ends here with share the road and a 4 ft. wide green painted sharrow because of the volume of traffic. The painted sharrow requires an FHWA Request to Experiment. Valley View Road from 62nd Street to TH62: removal of center turn lane and dedicated bike lane. The project terminates here. The traffic signal at France Avenue and 54`h will have bike detection and marking where bikes are to stop and the signal light will change automatically. Route Marking — Wayfinding: destination signs and route markers will be installed behind the curb along the corridor. Member Janovy said they will need to have a discussion on wayfinding signs before they are.established. Discussion Member Janovy asked about the kind of paint that will be used and she also asked if there is data to support that the turn lane is needed ?. In reference to the paint, Mr. Anderson said it is aboutost. He said they. will be'looking for a paint that is durable but will not be looking at high end paint because..it is r ental. Regarding,the center: left turn lane, he said Engineering staff did a study: #his past December and. it was del'—W.— d that it was needed. Member Braden asked if the different section treatments are trying to be as consistent as possible and the treatm Laforce does not think they are intuitive. Member ThorA minimize confusion. He said this is similar to roundabouts to use them. He said it is a good compromise. Member Wh drivers and a cyclist who was going from one treatment 01- Mf, . do you educate everyone. Member Janovy said sees drivers to know that they are to yield to cyclists a�nf�pe good job. He said there were some challenges and they'hi making conditions better or more confusing and he said th of the entire center lane but if th 6601 (:•significant amc support of the project., ie intuitive O'��yclists /drivers. Mr. Anderson said they ire , similar to thps in city of Minneapolis. Member said an educational component should be included to drivers were against•t ft but have since learned how aid she ha&�an incident this<evening with one of her bus er andher bus driver did no ee him. She asked how one and that it will take a lot of education for Mffib�a said Edina and Mr. Anderson have done a )ked at bestractices. As a funder, he asked if they are making it beater. He said he has advocated for removal if turrj pg_then�# ;Ishould stay in place. He encouraged to anoth what has destrians: Member Bass said it is not perfeffifor cyclist ",drivers but i goal. She said it shouldAeclear that cfildrenundecertain ey s the City forward until they can achieve the ultimate )uld . not ride in the streets. Mr.'Houle said a petition wa 'sent in by adjoining property owners two years ago requesting resurfacing of Gallagher Drive. He said this project will be one i, y with the Three Rivers Park District to include their on- street bike trail. Mr. Toby Muse, project manager with SE,i presented the plan. Mr. Muse said the project boundary is Parklawn Avenue.to France Avenue and that it is budgeted in the 2011 -15 Capital Improvement Plan. He said the road is 42 ft. with concrete curb and gutter, 5 ft. sidewalks, no parking, ten commercial driveway entrances, no pedestrian crossings, no roadway lighting and five Metro Transit bus stops. He said the plan is to do a mill and overlay, narrow the road to 28 ft. (requires a variance) to.include a 9 ft. boulevard, a 10 ft. bike trail, no on- street parking, relocating one bus stop and marked pedestrian crossings. Total project cost is $472,000 and funding will be mostly State Aid ($346,000), Three Rivers Trail ($120,000) and the balance from the.City's utility -fund. An open house was held on March 27 and a public hearing is scheduled for May 15 with construction beginning early September and ending mid - November. 3 Discussion Onsite meetings took place with Metro Transit to determine proper placement of bus stops and meetings with the owners of Cedars of Edina regarding proper placement of pedestrian crossings because their pool, tennis courts and other facilities are across the street in another complex and this was also taken into consideration with the bus stop relocation. Staff was asked if bike parking was discussed and Mr. Muse said no. Mr. Houle they can include bike parking. Member lyer said the meeting was attended by six Parklawn residents but the project is on Gallagher. He asked if a sample size is considered to determine moving forward. Mr. Houle said all impacted residents are generally invited to the informational meeting but staff does not look for a sample size to move forward. Streetlighting was asked about. Ms. Kelly Grissman with Three Rivers DistrW'said they do not light any of their regional trails; however, the local agency can provide lighting if they so desiir/r drez Member Janovy would like consideration for lighting, similar to the Promenade. Mr. Houle said because this is or5'ly i ll and overlay they cannot add lighting but they can install conduits for future lighting. Member Janovy asked if there will be a striped center liner ecause at their Iast��BETF meeting some members talked about having on- street bike lanes. Mr. Houle said the straigh�� way would not be sthi ed but the curve would be striped. He said the trend is not to stripe lower volume roadways. NQ��tr� ges will not be im act d ;'Y,,pro ect. I 01131JUI &d1dV1I VIJIIVIIJ VVVIKII IX%3[UUIJ— CICI.LIIJ11 LPISU%J-UICII I'`•',ifV Yff Member Janovy said the bylaws requ rg yf at this worki.ng.group be.chaired by a rJJember of the ETC and member Whited has agreed to be the chair. Mem e'r Janow r ominated memberA hitetl ag7chair and the nomination was seconded by ave. Motion carried. Updates Student Member None. a1Ke Colna 1 asK rorce — IVIlnuies,OTJyiarcma, zUiz Member Janovy said a bike rodeo is'/cffi ufed for this Saturday, April 21, 10 a.m. to noon, at Cornelia School, and there dina.org with new articles every couple of weeks. Member Whited enquired about is new feature on the website, BikeE/ expansion of bike lanes on W. 58`h Street as noted in the minutes. Mr. Houle will follow with an answer at the next meeting. Grandview Small Area Study Chair Nelson said the City Council unanimously approved the framework on April 17. He said he is not sure how they will be moving forward but eventually it will come back to the ETC. France Avenue Pedestrian Crossines Improvements Update Mr. Houle said they are designing the pedestrian crossings that were approved by City Council. He said the City Council discussed the need to have an urban landscape architect and WSB did a search of the area, including Wisconsin, and 4 LHB, Inc. seem to be a good fit. He said because of the size of the project it would be difficult to attract a national firm. He requested feedback from the ETC regarding the landscape architect and also stakeholders meetings which he would like to schedule in conjunction with the ETC meetings. Member Janovy asked if landscaping is included in WSB's contract and Mr. Houle said yes. She said the City Council wants a strong urban design but they did not say what they were looking for and she does not know what this company can do. She said further that it makes her uncomfortable when a contract goes to individuals involved with the City. Mr. Houle asked if they would like to set up a working group for this project. Member Janovy said she likes the idea of the entire ETC being involved in the stakeholders meetings and also like a couple being part of the design group. Member Braden volunteered to be part of the design group. Living Streets Working Group Update Member Thompson, chair of the working group gave a presentation AM! where it is today. He said discussions started in early 2011, and in Ma i51 Cii it. A working group was. created that has met twice (Dec 8 ar d IGlar 0) development workshop. He said Living Streets creates.a visiddjhe the futu aesthetics, green sustainability, solutions to traffic concern ;etc. Continuing, conduct policy review, identify stakeholders, etc. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — None Member Whited asked how to share articles w She volunteered to help with developing an edu Member lyer said he would like Member Braden, noted that the, ETC Member Janovy said t e,BETF woul for Living Streets. Sh ssai �Ec�ina; is meeting and cog more repr, echo what membehBraden said, shi Chair Nelson said t year. Member Thompson echoed the Safe has donFYlot in the Streets from its inception in Edina to Council.adopted a.resolution supporting nd on February 15 -they held- a policy �� at includes safe walking, education; err Barr Engineering was selected to r�rrr�. She w8sKfold to email them to Mr. Houle for distribution. B for: the puhlic for the Bike Blvd project. a r. i-love toy ha'v'e volunteers'to= =.help with education and this will probably be the same part ofBoomingtnrHealtfsSafe Routes to School and they've just had their first ntationrfro citizens and ETC and suggested possibly setting up a working group. To said g the Cu'fhciI has be n very engaged. int workinj : session en said. ay with the City Council to review the ETC's priorities for the Member Bass thanked staff for their pWsistence in pursuing the France Avenue scope change. She said it is a huge win for residents. She thanked outgoing chair Janovy for her service and welcomed new chair Nelson. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Houle thanked the Mayor, City Manager, and member Janovy for their involvement with the France Avenue scope change. A group photo has been requested, probably to be posted to the website, and there is a release form for everyone to sign. A copy of the final bylaws was handed out. 5 ADJOURNMENT Member La Force motioned to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 p.m. and the motion was seconded by memberJanovy. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet w91pNi�r� o F< %' Atli U1 ay . ',��ORPOR iti9 a RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -70 SUPPORTING BIKE BOULEVARD GRANT FROM TRANSIT FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES City of Edina WHEREAS,. ,the City . -of . Edina.. is. committed to supporting the bicycling - - - community by adopting a Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan in 2007; WHEREAS, the Transit for Livable Communities has granted the City of Edina a grant for bike boulevard in the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is committed to the completion of a successful project; and WHEREAS, the Edina Transportation Commission will be conducting the public process for this project and will require additional time to ensure the best project possible; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council requests the Transit for Livable Communities grant additional t ADOPTED this 7t" day of June, 2011. Attest: 0 A.... ebra A. Mange ,City lerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 7, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1-7 41Aday of 20 !� . City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com U City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 W 50TH ST i ■dIA p 1 Will an V - , ME -2 _ =1!i W 54TH ST_ Mason M �_- _- _- _____- _____ -___ IN _- -__ _- - I■ .umw mum -J =� a_I ME M1 on MMMM ate __ m � -- - I _ S • - � I 11 == = S -- I i be W ,_ _ == i a r Q 11b E Nm I I I I I I Lake II _ I Cornelia M i r i I 4k WA i I W 70TH ST / W +E �.\. Bike Blvd Mailing Area S ; Engineering Dept �:, May, 2012 5525 Kellogg Ave. Edina, MN 55424 952 922 =8171 4 May 2012 Shannon Allison Engineering Department City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN.55439.. RE: - Comments,. Bikeway Improvement.Project Dear Shannon Allison Enclosed are my comments on the proposed project. Sincerely, encl w ohn R. Plotnicky BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ITEM Traffic circle at Beard and Drew Avenues. Removal of stop signs there. 54th Street from France Ave- nue to Wooddale. Install bike lane and eliminate parking on the north side. Road conditions at 54th St. COMMENTS This seems to be only a marginal, if any if- , improvement from both a safety and ease of biking view point. Traffic is not heavy there and for a bike rider, stopping at the signs is not a problem. A bike lane would be a safety improvement. If the east /west stop signs near the bridge were removed it would make it easier to ride a bike. Now, if you're riding east or west when going downhill you have to stop at the stop signs. At that!. point you've lost your forward momentum - and face a long climb from that stopping point. If those east /west stop signs near the bridge are removed, I recommend the stop sign on Minnehaha Blvd. and 54th remain. If parking was pagmitted on the north side of 54th in the vicinity of Edina Lutheran Church during church functions that would be acceptable to me. The single biggest road hazard and concern now is the condition of the The pot holes are dangerous for car travel and particularly so for bike Correcting that situation would be biggest bike improvement. safety road. travel. the Wavne Houle From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:18 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: TLC Bike Boulevard Project _ J Importance: High Good morning, This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 . Ib!unno(a)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy.choice the easy choice! From: Donahue, Charles [mailto: Charles. Dona hue @ bsci.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:10 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprag-ue @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Importance: High Ladies and Gentlemen of the Edina City Council, I want to express my outrage that ANY tax dollars - Federal or Local- would be spent on this project. I don't believe this "project' is needed or wanted by the majority of the citizens in Edina. Further,.this would cause automobile traffic issues and inconvenience travelers on Wooddale Avenue which would far outweigh the convenience rendered to bicyclists. I will call each of you to discuss this further. Sincerely, Chuck Donahue 5105 Indianola Ave. Edina 1 Wayne Houle, From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 9:47 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Good morning, This message has been-forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov- ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: tpauls6n @1992venture.s.com [mailto :tpaulson @1992ventures.comj Sent: Tuesday, May 08; 2,012'9.-'25 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl` @gmail.com Subject: TLC Bike Boulevard Project ., Dear City Council Members: am writing today in opposition of the proposed TLC Bike Boulevard Project as recommended by, Wayne 0. Houle in his April 19, 2012 report to the Edina Transportation Commission. I am not opposed to.bike lanes,that are properly conceived, designed, constructed, and funded, but I am opposed to this project as I believe it fails several of these criteria. First, I oppose this project based on its funding. mechanism. The legislation appropriating the fundin&for this grant included a very specific purpose, which was t6 "demonstrate the extent to which bicycling and walking can carry a significant part of the transportation load, and represent a_ major, portion of the transportation- solution, within selected communities ". I have not heard a single reference tathis purpose during my discussions -with city staff, the city's consultant on the project, or the administrator of the grant nor have I seen or heard reference to it in any documentation or presentations. I have, however, seen and heard a city goal to "provide dedicated bicycle lanes" and an objective to "encourage increased bicycling and improve safety for cyclists ". I have also heard the grant administrator state that he would like to make conditions better for'bicyclists and pedestrians and make it much safer so it will "encourage more people, probably, to try- bicycling ". If the purpose of the legislation, and therefore the grant, was to.-simply increase bicycling the legislators would . have stated the purpose as such. They did not. In my view bicyclists carrying a significant part of the transportation load is very different than increasing bicycling. Does the city have any evidence that past projects funded from this legislation have-demonstrated that bicyclist can carry a "significant" part of the transportation load? Does the city even know the current bicycle and pedestrian load on the proposed route? What does the city consider to be a "significant" part of the transportation load? I also find it ironic that the funding source for the grant, the Highway Trust Fund, is funded through taxes on motor vehicle fuel and tires, truck and trailer sales, and heavy use vehicles, but the purpose of the grant is to remove motor vehicles (and therefore taxes for funding projects) from.the roads. According to city staff and the city's consultant all of the costs of the project would be covered by grant. However, I have not seen or heard what the on -going costs might be. Does the city have estimates of what it will cost to maintain 1 the traffic circles, paint, and signs? How about costs to educate the public on how to use the new bike, and motor vehicle traffic, lanes? At the April 19,2012 Transportation Commission meeting some commissioners expressed concern that the new markings and use would not be "intuitive" and that motor vehicle operators might not know what the markings mean. Michael Thompson and Jennifer Janovy were quick to reply that the Transportation Commission would need to reach out to the public in different ways and educate the public. How does the city plan to educate the public? How much will this cost the city? Second; I oppose this project based on the design standards that are being recommended. Two sections of the project, Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, are considered "experimental" as they have "sub- standard lane widths ". Safety is not the first thing that comes -to -mind when I hear "experimental" or "sub- standard lane widths ". Could this create liability for the city? In addition, the grant administrator has stated that "bike /walk street projects" are generally characterized and most appropriate on streets with posted speed, limits of 25 mph and average motor vehicle counts not exceeding 3,000 per day. According to city data Wooddale Avenue is traveled by about 3,850 motor vehicles per day and has a-posted speed limit of 30 mph. It's also worth - noting that Wooddale Avenue, which represents about 34% of the surface miles covered bythe project, would be one of the "experimental" sections of the project. I find it interesting.how the city communicated the proposed project to the residents living on, and around, the project route — namely two letters to ,residents. In the event of a zoning variance the city requires notices to be sent to property owners within 200 feet of the proposed "variance. In the event of a rezoning the city requires the petitioner to erect a three foot by five foot sign and requires notices to be sent to property owners with 1,000 feet of the proposed rezoning. The proposed project would drastically change the road markings with the stated of goal of trying to increase bicycling (and legislative purpose'of reducing motor vehicle use) and the only notices the city sent were two letters inviting residents to an open house;and an informational meeting. Neither letter mentioned the fact that the purpose of the grant was to change the way the road would be used by restriping the roads in an effort to make them more bicycle friendly and less motor vehicle friendly. Neither city staff nor the city consultant could tell me who received the letters or the process for determining who would receive them. City staff thought they "probably" sent letters to property owners on the proposed route: There are about 140 homes on Wooddale Avenue from W. 50th Street to Valley View Road so, based on,comments by city staff, we can assume about 140 homes along this section of the project received letters. However, approximately 3,850 motor vehicles use Wooddale Avenue every day so there are more people with an interest in the use of this road than just those property owners living on Wooddale Avenue. Why does the city have such specific requirements for notice regarding variances and rezoning, which generally deal with private residences or private businesses, and seem to have no requirements for notice for attempting to change the use of public roads? Specifically regarding 54th Street, the final recommendation included two bike lanes of.6' to 7' and two motor vehicle lanes of 11' with a.-reported width of 35' for the street. According to the recommendation these will be dedicated bike lanes as they meet the "ideal" standards of 5'. for bike lanes and 11', for motor vehicle lanes. However, I took eight measurements.of the width of 54th Street between Minnehaha Avenue. and Wooddale Avenue and four of them were not as wide as the "ideal" standards (28'4" at the bridge, 30` west'of "the parking near the bridge, 3'1' at Kellogg, and 31'10" at the second driveways east of Wooddale).Vill these sections need to be striped as advisory bike lanes and be deemed "experimental "? Finally, I oppose this project because it proposes to use funds that could /should be saved or spent elsewhere. Our nation is approaching $16 trillion dollars in debt with no plan to end our annual deficits and no idea how to begin paying down the debt. The City of Edina rejecting a $250,000 grant would be a very small step in the right direction, but at least it would be a step. Please vote against the TLC Bike Boulevard Project. In the interim, I look forward to your responses to the ten questions raised herein. Respectfully, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Avenue Ji � Ow e tl� rW� cn e'^'coR88e To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. VIII. A. From: Lisa Schaefer Human Resources Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -79 Expressing Support Products Containing Only Conflict -Free Minerals. for the Purchase of ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached proposed Resolution No. 2012 -79 expressing support for the purchase of products containing only conflict -free minerals. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At the January meeting of the Human Rights Commission (EHHRC), Edina High School students representing the organization "STAND" presented a proposal opposing the use of metals and other materials mined and produced in certain African countries. Specifically, the Democratic Republic of the Congo employs armed groups to force labor to extract such minerals and raw materials. Thousands of deaths have been reported to occur from violence inflicted in order to maintain control of the mines and resources utilizing forced labor. A national initiative is seeking support of efforts to call attention to these practices and seek multiple means of discouraging so- called "Conflict Minerals" to be extracted using these inhumane means. Numerous colleges, universities and human rights organizations have adopted such statements of support, as well as the cities of Pittsburgh, PA and St. Petersburg, FL. The statements range from general support and recognition of the issue to encouraging changes in purchasing policies of computers and electronics through government unit procurement programs and shareholder initiatives. The City of Edina makes a significant investment in computers and electronics. These purchases are made primarily through the State of Minnesota purchasing contract. The EHRRC has approved the attached proposed resolution, and recommends that the City of Edina adopt a statement recognizing that it is aware and concerned about the crisis taking place where Conflict Minerals are obtained and utilized, including those contained in computer and electronic products that may be purchased by the City. ATTACHMENT: Resolution # 2012 -79 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -79 EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE PURCHASE OF PRODUCTS CONTAINING ONLY CONFLICT -FREE MINERALS WHEREAS, Edina High School students representing the organization "STAND" have requested the Edina City Council oppose the use of metals and other materials mined -and produced in certain African countries, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo in products manufactured throughout the world, WHEREAS, the Democratic Republic of the Congo employs armed groups to force labor to extract such minerals and raw materials, WHEREAS, thousands of deaths have been reported and verified to occur from violence inflicted in order to maintain control of the mines and resources to enhance forced labor, WHEREAS, a national initiative is seeking support and efforts to call attention to these practices and seek multiple means of discouraging so- called "Conflict Minerals from being used in the production of technology equipment and other products, WHEREAS, the City of Edina makes significant investment in technology primarily through joint purchasing contracts through the State of Minnesota WHEREAS, Edina's commitment to human rights for all people of the world has been previously demonstrated. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council joins a broad coalition of individuals and organizations. worldwide to: 1. Seek alternative sources of supply for Edina purchases of products using "Conflict Minerals." 2. Encourage all electronic companies with which the State and City do business to address their own supply sources in combating this situation. 3. Consider future policies that the City may utilize in making the public generally, and Edina citizens specifically, aware of these worldwide problems in hope of combating the inhumane treatment of human beings located anywhere. Dated: May 15, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly, appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2012, and as recorded iri ;the.Mihutes , of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said, City this day of 20 ...City Clerk 0 l��i 1000 I REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.B. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -76 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2012 -76 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-76 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Edina Park Department: Edina Community Foundation $5,000.00 Edina Chamber of Commerce 405h Anniversary Project (Design & Development Landscape Project on City Hall Campus) Dated: May 15, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov a 952 -927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 - Oahe �rvv�o roRPOPA ieee REPORURECOM M EN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.0 From: Solvei Wilmot ® Action Environmental Health ❑ Discussion Specialist/Recycling Coordinator ❑ Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Authorize Residential Curbside Recycling Contract Negotiations ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize staff to enter into contract negotiations with the "best value" proposal for Residential Curbside Recycling services. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The current Residential Curbside Recycling services contract expires December 31, 2012. The Edina City Council met with the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) at the February 21, 2012 work session and approved the "best value" review process and percentage weighting for evaluating residential curbside recycling proposals. The "best value" review includes evaluation of 1) Environment 40 %, 2) Economics 40 %, 3) Education 15% and 4) Qualifications 5 %. Council supported EEC recommendation to hire a consultant to aid in the development and analysis of the Request for Proposal (RFP). Dan Krivit, Senior Project Manager, Foth Infrastructure and Environment, LLC was contracted to provide these services. The RFP for Residential Curbside Recycling Service was presented to the City Council on March 20, 2012 and was approved by Council for release. The RFP included questions developed by the EEC and the Recycling and Solid Waste Work Group to determine "best value" for Environment, Economics, Education and Qualifications. Four companies submitted Residential Curbside Recycling proposals: 1) Allied Waste Systems, 2) Randy's Environmental Services, 3) Tennis Sanitation and 4) Waste Management. None of the proposals were for dual -sort collection and therefore only single- stream collection is being considered. The Environment, Education and Qualifications portion of the proposals were reviewed by a Review Committee consisting of Sherry Engelman, Community Health Administrator, Lt. Mike Nibbe, Police and Solvei Wilmot, Environmental Health Specialist and Recycling Coordinator. Consultant Dan Krivit completed the Economic analysis and incorporated Environment, Education and Qualifications reviews to develop "best value" ranking and overall summary. Consultant Dan Krivit will be present. The City Attorney has reviewed the summary and the Draft Single Stream Recycling Collection Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: (pdf format) Draft Minutes from Recycling and Solid Waste Work Group, May 3, 2012 Draft Minutes excerpt from Energy and Environment Commission, May 10, 2012 Draft Single Stream Recycling Collection Agreement Minutes for the Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group (RSW WG) of Edina's Energy and Environment Commission Thursday, May. 3, 2012 Time 7:15 P.M. Location: City Hall, Community Room, 2nd floor The meeting was called to order at 7:20 by Chair Latham. Present in addition to Chair Latham were Tim Rudnicki, Michelle Horan, Melissa Seeley and Sarah Zarrin. Staff present included Solvei Wilmot and Michael Nibbe. One member of the public was present, Ms Mandy Mensen of Allied Waste Services. The focus of the meeting was to review the Foth consultant report summary by Dan Krivit of the City of Edina staff team's review of the 2012 residential recycling proposals. The staff team consisted of- Solvei Wilmot, Michael Nibbe and Sherry Engelman. Chair Latham complimented the staff team for their ability to turn around a review of the four proposals in such a constrained time line. Solvei Wilmot expressed appreciation for the work the RSW WG did in providing input during the preparation of the RFP. Chair Latham inquired if any of the proposers had been.formally made aware ofthe May 3 RSW WG meeting. Solvei Wilmot indicated that only Allied and Tennis had inquired about the date of the meeting and were thus informed. The RSW WG members were concerned that at 7 years, the length of the contract exceeded the typical 5 year technology lifespan, but acknowledged that the 7 year contract yields the best price at a possible cost of not obtaining technological advances at the earliest opportunity. It was noted that the grand total of points of the top two proposals were extremely close — 86 for proposer D and 84 for proposer C. As a consequence, multiple RSW WG members had concerns as to what metric was used to calculate the number of points awarded for the 3 point subtotals of the Environment (40 points), Education (15 points) and Qualifications (5 points). The Economic subtotal (40 points) was quantifiable based on price and revenue credits returned to the city. The other three evaluation criteria are more subjective. Solvei Wilmot responded that similar to the 2008 RFP evaluation process, the categories defined under each criteria were taken as a whole and a total number of points subjectively awarded. As in 2008, there was no defined metric to award a subset number of points to each category. There were 9 such categories defined in the 2012 RFP for the Environment criteria, with 3 categories defined in the 2012 RFP for the Education criteria and 7 categories defined in the 2012 RFP for the Qualifications criteria. These categories were similar to those in the 2008 RFP. Had there been a metric for each category it would have been transparent as to how the points were arrived at for the more subjective criteria. Tim Rudnicki articulated that we need better data from the RFP responders to make a fully informed evaluation and assignment of points especially for the environmental criteria.. Members expressed dissatisfaction that the consultant had not supplied a metric. Chair Latham acknowledged that the consultant had not been specifically asked to do so. It was recommended that a metric be part.of the next RFP and that Hennepin County Environmental Services be. approached about providing input to such a metric. Chair Latham acknowledged'that because the 2012 RFP process had only 6 months compared to the 18 month 2008 RFP process, that a suitable metric had not been developed. Because the top two 2012. RFP proposers' totals were so close and because a metric was lacking, it was recommended that further information be gathered as follows: 1. Tim Rudnicki recommended that the top two proposers be required to document how much energy is used to handle one ton.of material at each step of the process. This would give a metric for an overall indication of the vendor with the most efficient operation. This would address the GHG emission reduction issue. All RSW WG members agreed that this recommendation would be wise. To accomplish this, Tim Rudnicki indicated that the following information would be needed from each of the top two proposers: a.) What energy sources (e.g., gasoline, electricity, natural gas, diesel, biodiesel, other fuels, etc.) does the proposer use at each stage of the collection, transfer and processing of their recycling enterprise? b.) How much energy is used to handle one ton of material in each step of the process? The top two proposers would be expected to include, but not limited to, fuel used to collect and/or transfer one ton of material; electricity in the processing stage to handle one ton of material (this is the energy needed to run conveyor belts, fans, blowers, climate control, etc); and energy (e.g., diesel, natural gas) to operate transfer equipment like loaders, etc. 2. Sarah Zarrin recommended that the top two proposers be required to document the fuel efficiency of their fleet. All RSW WG members agreed that this would be wise. 3. Chair Latham recommended that the City. Council take advantage of their option to tour the facilities of the top two proposers. The only individ'u'als that had toured all 4 proposers' facilities were Solvei Wilmot and Chair Latham. Of the staff review team, Sherry Engelman toured only the Allied facility and Michael Nibble toured only the Allied and Buckingham facilities. In the future, all on the staff review team- should be required to tour.all proposer's facilities. All RSW WG members agreed that this recommendation would be wise. There will be no regularly scheduled June 7 RSW WG meeting. Instead, Solvei Wilmot will schedule a June tour for some time after June 14 for the Sioux composting site in Shakopee. The meeting'was adjoumed.at 8 :30. pm. Respectfully submitted, Dianne Plunkett Latham Chair Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thurs., May 10, 2012 7:14 PM CALL TO ORDER 7:14p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Members Gubrud, Heer, Jennings, Kostuch, Latham, Rudnicki, Thompson, Zarrin and Chair Sierks Absent: Gupta, Paterlini, and Risser Absent: Staff Liaison, Karen Kurt Staff Present: Rebecca Foster and Solvei Wilmot III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Kostuch to approve the Agenda as written. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Change the July 4th Parade minutes to, Hoping to have a Tolby mascot. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Consent Agenda per the edits discussed for the April EEC Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Darrell Hoekstra, Waste Management John O'Neal, Allied Waste VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Board and Commission survey results. Joel Stegner presented the survey results to the Commissioners. B. Recycling & Solid Waste WG 1. Residential Recycling RFP. Discussion was held regarding the lack of an environmental matrix to produce a more substantive evaluation for the weighing of the proposals. Concern was expressed about seeking additional weighing information from the proposers after the proposals had been opened. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Kostuch to 1. Negotiate with the top two proposers. 2. The following metrics should be used in scoring the environmental criterion: a. What energy sources (e.g., gasoline, electricity, natural gas, diesel, biodiesel, other fuels, etc.) does the proposer use at each stage of the collection, transfer and processing of their recycling enterprise? b. The top two proposers should be required to document the fuel efficiency of their fleet. 3. City Council members should tour top two proposer's facilities. 4. The top two proposers should submit a Syr bid in addition to their 7yr bid. Discussion was held regarding the best value ranking resulted in the best environmental scorer does not offer the best economic package. Members expressed concern that a more quantities matrix should be developed to evaluate the environmental category. Members expressed concern about reevaluating the proposals since they have already been evaluated and a ranking has been established. Members expressed concern about the seven year length of the contract and why a shorter time wasn't offered. Ms. Wilmot commented that the proposals had been reviewed and the best value proposal was the seven year length. Members discussed a five year contract but recognized the shorter contract may increase the cost of the contract. Commissioner Rudnicki recommended matrix 2a above. Commissioner Zarrin recommended matric2b above. Commissioner Latham recommended that the City Council members tour the Material Recycling Facility (MRF) of both the top two proposers given that with two top proposers there is at least a 50% chance that the contract will change vendors. General concern was expressed with the fact that there were no commissioners on the Recycling RFP review team. This is a continuing EEC concern given that there were no commissioners on the solar panel RFP review team. Motion carried unanimously. Motion made by Commissioner Rudnicki, seconded by Commissioner Thompson a.) The above metric should also include how much energy is used to handle one ton of material in each step of the process. The top two proposers would be expected to include, but not limited to, fuel used to collect and /or transfer one ton of material; electricity in the processing stage to handle one ton of material (this is the energy needed to run conveyor belts, fans, blowers, climate control, etc); and energy (e.g., diesel, natural gas) to operate transfer equipment like loaders, etc. Discussion — Commissioners Heer and Kostuch believed that this metric could only be validated if the proposers also documented the assumptions upon which the data was gathered, and could involve considerable effort to gather. Commissioner Latham was concerned that this could extend the time frame to arrive at a decision. Commissioner Rudnicki assured the commission that vendors had routine knowledge of this data in the operation of their plants and that it would not be difficult for proposers to gather. Commissioner Sierks acknowledged that he did not know if this data were difficult to gather or not but believed that it would be worth the effort to try to obtain in order to quantity the environmental criterion of the RFP. Ms. Wilmot expressed concern about how to gather the data. Roll Call was taken: Ayes: Gubrud, Rudnicki, Thompson, Zarrin and Chair Sierks Nayes: Heer, Kostuch, Latham, Absent: Paterlini and Risser (Addition agenda items for the EEC Minutes will be completed at a later date. Only the preceding minutes were compiled in order to be included with the City Council packet on 5/11112) There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 9:20p.m. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Gubrud to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Excerpt Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Foster GIS Administrator SINGLE STREAM RECYCLING COLLECTION AGREEMENT AGREEMENT dated , 2012, by.and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and , a (the "Contractor ") RECITALS A. The Contractor desires to provide single stream recycling collection services to residents of the City of Edina. B. The City desires to provide these services for the health, safety and welfare of its residents. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. Addendum to the City of Edina Request for Proposals (RFP) for Residential Curbside Recycling Services dated C. Request for Proposals (RFP) for Residential Curbside Recycling Services March 13, 2012. D. Proposal for the City of Edina, MN for Residential Curbside Recycling Services. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document "A" having the first priority and Contract Document "D" having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 16408101 1 RNK:04/30/2012 1 , 3. DEFINITIONS. A. Recyclable Material's: Means all items of refuse designated'by to be part of an authorized recycling program and which are intended for transportation, processing, and re- manufacturing or reuse and include the following: 0 0 o . 0 o 0 o" o Any additions or exclusions as agreed upon by Contractor and City. B. Recycling Container: Means a cart in which recyclable materials can be stored. and later placed at the curb or alley for collection as specified by the City. Acceptable containers shall be a 65 gallon wheeled cart provided by the Contractor and properly marked-for recycling. C. Single Stream Recydig Collection Service: Residents will be instructed to commingle All recyclable materials in one container that will be picked up by Contractor. Contractor will pick up all recyclable material placed in andnekt to recycling containers at Certified Dwelling. Units and other City designated collection stops in the City of Edina. D. Certified Dwelling Unit (CDU): Means E. Contractor: Means person or.. persons authorized by the City to perform recycling collection services on prescribed routes within collection districts within the City of Edina: F. Collection Hours: Means the time period during which collection of recyclable material is authorized in the City. G. Missed Collection: Means the failure of the Contractor to provide recycling collection service to a CDU or other City designated collection stop within the recycling district during collection hours on the scheduled collection day. H. Holiday Means any of the following: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Pres'ident's Day, Memorial'Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. I. Scheduled Collection Day: Means the day or days of the week on which recycling collection service by the Contractor is to occur, as specified in the contract with the City. If a holiday occurs on a weekday, the collection for each day of that week after the holiday will be made one (1) working day later. 16408101 RNK:04/30/2012 4 '4 4. CONTRACTOR'S COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS. A. Residential Curbside Recycling Collection Program. 16408101 RNK:04/30/2012 1. Frequency of Residential Collection: Residential recycling collection shall occur biweekly. 2. Residential Collection Hours: Collection shall commence no earlier than 7:00 a.m. local time and shall be completed by 7:00 p.m. collection day. Residents will be required to have materials placed at the collection point by 7:00 a.m. on the scheduled collection day. Compliance with Laws and Regulations: In providing services hereunder, the Contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provision of services to be provided hereunder. Any violation shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. This contract shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota, and ordinances of the City of Edina. 4. Weighing of Loads and Reporting Requirements: The Contractor will keep accurate records consisting of an approved weight slip with the date, time, collection route, driver's identification, vehicle number, rate and gross weight, net weight and number of route stops for each loaded vehicle. A detailed monthly report shall be provided to the City that identifies total tonnage activity by commodity. This report should include all curbside and municipal recycling activity. Recycle Cart Purchase and Deliverer The Contractor agrees to, at its expense, purchase, deliver, service and repair, and maintain sufficient cart inventory to meet supply and demand needs for the City of Edina Recycling CDU's, estimated to be in number. The Contractor shall initially deliver one 65- gallon cart to each CDU and have a sufficient inventory of 30- gallon and 90- gallon carts available for delivery and switch -out with the 65- gallon carts per resident/customer request. The standard _65- gallon cart shall be approximately in dimension, and be smooth for ease in cleaning. The cart shall be green with a yellow lid and be uniform and consistent in color and design with a recycling symbol- on two sides` and front and approved instruction label imbedded into each lid, so as to be easily identified by the resident/customer and the Contractor driver as the container for recyclable materials. 6. Recycling' Cart Maintenance/Replacement: The driver is required to report to the Contractor the location of any cart that is damaged. The Contractor is required to notify the Recycling Coordinator by fax/email of any driver report of cart damage. The Recycling Coordinator will notify the Contractor by fax/email of any cart damage or request for change of cart size that is reported/requested to them by customers /residents. Any damaged cart or cart request will be repaired or replaced by the Contractor within two (2) week of the report. 7. Point of Collection: Most residential recycling collection will occur at the same location from where the regular refuse is collected, generally the alleys where they exist and street curbside in other areas. Carts shall be placed with the handle toward the house and lid opening toward the street or alley. The driver is required to place the emptied cart back/down in the same location as set by resident. Recycling carts /containers for municipal recycling collection shall be placed at agreed upon specific locations as determined by the City. All carts /containers shall be returned to the specific location after completion of collection. 8. Ownership of Recyclable Materials: All recyclable materials for collection shall remain the responsibility and in the .ownership of the.,occupant of the resident or municipal location until handled for collection by the Contractor. At the point of collection the recyclable materials become the property of the Contractor. Any person or persons taking recyclable materials from a curbside container without explicit permission of the resident or municipality will be in violation of local ordinance and subject to penalty. The Contractorshall report to the Recycling Coordinator any. instances of suspected scavenging or unauthorized removal of recyclable materials from any collection container. 9. Route Management and Customer Service: The Contractor shall, at• all times, provide the City's Recycling Coordinator with a lead route /driver supervisor who is accessible to the Contractor dispatch department via two way communications and to the, Recycling Coordinator to handle route and collection issues in a timely fashion. The Contractor shall have on duty Monday through Friday'from:8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. a dispatch customer service representative to receive customer calls and route issues.. The Contractor shall provide a 24 hour answering service line or device to receive customer calls. The Route Supervisor and all, collection vehicles must be equipped with 2 -way communication devices. 10. Procedure for Unacceptable Materials ,-Materials Outside Cart and Unreachable 'Carts: If the Contractor determines that.ax'�esident has set out unacceptable recyclable materials, left recyclable materials outside of the cart, or has positioned the cart so that it is unreachable with the mechanical arm, the Contractor shall,use the following. procedures: a. The Contractor shall collect all the recyclable materials and leave an "education tag" provided by the Contractor attached to the handle of the recycling container indicating acceptable materials, the proper method of preparation and the proper placement of the cart. b. The driver shall record the address and report the addresses to the Contractor dispatcher, who will notify the City's Recycling Coordinator of the addresses no later than noon the following day. 164081v01 4 RNK:04/30/2012 11. Procedure for Complaints-Questions- Missed Collections. A complaint of "service or missed collection is a complaint received by the Contractor from either the customer or the Administration Office. If the report is for a missed stop and is received by the Contractor before 1:00 p.m. on a scheduled working day, the-Contractor is required to return to the complaint address and complete the collection. If the report is registered after 1:00 p.m. on a scheduled working day, the Contractor is required to return to the complaint address by 12:00 noon the following working day. 12. Clean up °Responsibilities: The Contractor-shall adequately clean up any recyclable material spilled. or blown during the course of collection and/or hauling operations. All collection vehicles shall be equipped with at least one broom and one shovel for use in'cleaning up material spillage. The Contractor shall have no responsibility to remove or clean up any items, which are not recyclable materials. 13. Non - Completion of Collection and Extension of Collection Hours: The Contractor shall inform the City of the areas not completed, the reason for non - completion, and the expected time of completion. 14. Collection Vehicle Equipment Requirements: Each collection vehicle shall be equipped with the following: a. A two way communication system. b. A first aid kit. C. An approved 2AlOBC dry chemical fire extinguisher. d. Warning flashers. e. Overhead strobe light. f. "Reverse" audio warning alarm to indicate movement in reverse. g. Signs on the rear of the vehicle which state "This Vehicle Makes Frequent Stops." h. A rear mounted video camera and cab monitor /screen to view operations occurring at the rear.of the vehicle. i. Hazard.flares and cones. j. A broom and a shovel for.cleaning up spills. k. "Absorb" pillows or dry product adequate to absorb /contain any oil /liquid spill from collection vehicle. All required equipment must be in proper working order at all times. All vehicles must be maintained in proper working order and be clean and free from odor as much as possible. All collection vehicles shall be uniformly painted and the paint shall be in good condition. The Contractor's name shall be clearly visible from all sides of the vehicle, along with the Contractor's phone number, the Recycling symbol, and the vehicle ID number. 15. Driver Duties and Responsibilities: The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that there is sufficient personnel and equipment to fulfill the requirements and specifications of this contract proposal, and that all personnel 16408101 5 RNK:04/30/2012 are trained both in program operations and in customer service and insure that all personnel maintain a positive attitude with the public and in the work place and shall: a. Conduct themselves at all times in a courteous manner and use no abusive or foul language. b. Be clean and presentable in appearance, as so far as possible. C. Wear a uniform and employee identification badge or name tag. d. Drive in a safe and considerate manner. e. Manage carts in a careful manner, setting them back in place so as to avoid spillage and littering or damage to container. f. Perform their work in a neat and quiet manner, monitor for any spillage and be responsible for cleaning up any litter or breakage spilled in collection and hauling operations. g. Record all addresses that could not be collected and reasons, turn list into dispatch at end of each collection day and copies sent to Recycling Coordinator. h. Attach an education tab to the container identifying problems and how to resolve them. i. Collect and transport recyclable materials according to all existing laws and ordinances, and future amendments thereto, of the State of Minnesota and local governing bodies. j. Report all damage to property. 16. Holiday The Contractor will observe all holidays on which no recycling collection service will be performed. When a holiday occurs on a scheduled collection day, the collection for each day of that week after the holiday shall be made one (1) working day later. 17. Contract Lend: This contract shall commence and shall be for years ending 18. Rate: $ per month per CDU. 19. Rate Adjustments: The rate shall be adjusted as follows 20. Default. Any of the following occurrences, conditions, or acts shall be deemed a "Default" under this Agreement: a. If either party fails to observe or perform its obligations under this Agreement and does not cure such failure within ten (10) days from its receipt of written notice of breach without, however, limiting any other rights available to parties pursuant to any other provisions of this Agreement. b. Except as expressly limited hereby, City and Contractor shall have such remedies for the default of the other party hereto as may be provided at 16408101 6 RNK:04/30/2012 law or equity following written notice of such default and failure to cure the same within ten (10) days. 21. Termination. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be terminated without any penalty or further liability as follows: a. Upon ten (10) days written notice in the event of a default (as defined above); b. Upon ninety (90) days written notice by Contractor, if Contractor is unable to obtain or maintain any license, permit or other governmental approval necessary to the operation of the Contractor's business; Upon ninety (90) days written notice by.City if it determines that Contractor has failed to comply with applicable ordinances, or state or federal.law, or any conditions attached to governmental approvals granted thereunder, after a public hearing before the City's Council. 22. Taxes. Contractor shall pay any taxes, of any nature, due, owing or levied in association with its services pursuant to this Agreement. 23. Insurance. a. The Contractor must maintain the types and amounts of insurance set forth in the b. Adjustment to Insurance Coverage Limits. The coverage limits shall be increased at the time of any rate adjustment by the Consumer Price Index. f. Additional Insured - Certificate of Insurance. The Contractor shall provide, prior to starting services, evidence of the required insurance in the form of a Certificate of Insurance issued by a company (rated -A+ or better), licensed, to do business in the State of Minnesota, which includes all,coverages required in this paragraph. Contractor will name the City as an Additional Insured on the General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability Polices ` The Certificate(s) shall also provide the coverage may not be cancelled, non- renewed, or materially changed without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 24. Indemnification. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all claims, costs, losses, expenses, demands, actions, or causes of action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, which may be asserted against or incurred by City or for which City may be liable in the performance of this Agreement, except those which arise solely from the negligence, willful misconduct, or other fault of 16408101 7 RNK:04/30/2012 25 26. 21 28. CITY: CITY OF EDINA 16408101 RNK:04 /30/2012 City. Contractor shall defend the City against all claims arising out of the performance of this Agreement. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered or mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested, or sent by overnight carrier to the following addresses: If to City, to: If to Contractor, to: .City of Edina 4801 W. 40th Street Edina, Minnesota, 55424 Attention: Assignment. This Agreement, or rights thereunder, may not be sold, assigned, or transferred at any time by Contractor without the written consent of the City. Successors and' Assi ns. This Agreement shall be binding upon an&inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, personal representatives and assigns. Miscellaneous. a. The prevailing party in any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs, including appeals, if any. b. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations and other agreements. These are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties.. C. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. d. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. 8 WGRIM X71 "I IJA C James Hovland, Mayor AND Scott Neal, City Manager 16408101 9 RNK:04/30/2012 PIM Its: Addition to Item VIII. C. Received From Sarah Zarrin May 15, 2012 Because the total points awarded by the City staff team to the top two proposers was so close, and because the disparity in points awarded, by the City staff team to the top two proposers for the economic criterion and for the environmental criterion was. so great, the EEC made the following recommendation: 1. Negotiate with the top two :proposers. 2. The following metric should be used in scoring the environmental criterion: a. What energy sources (e.g., gasoline, electricity, natural gas, diesel, biodiesel, other fuels, etc.) -does the proposer use at each stage of the collection, transfer and processing of their recycling `enterprise? b. How much energy is used to handle one ton of material in each step of the process. The top two proposers would be expected to include, but not limited to, fuel used to collect and /or transfer one ton of material; electricity in the processing stage to handle one ton of material (this is the energy- needed to run conveyor'belts, fans, blowers, climate control, etc); and energy (e.g., diesel, natural gas) to operate transfer equipment like loaders, etc. c. The top two proposers should be required to document the fuel efficiency of their fleet. 3. City Council members should tour top two proposer's facilities. 4. The top two proposers should submit a Syr bid in add.ition'to their 7 year bid. Justification for the Inclusion Hof an Environmental Mdtric: The scoring results of the 2009 RFP were very different _from the scoring results of the. 2012 RFP. In 2009, the high proposer was high on both the environmental criterion and on the economic criterion. In 2012, one proposer had the best price and another proposer had the best environmental score as determined by the City staff team. It is difficult to award environmental points without a quantitative metric. Without a well defined environmental metric, the points are awarded subjectively and there is no transparency as to how the environmental points are awarded. The proposed metrics would lead to a stronger evaluation of the environmental factors and will provide much more information than we have currently so that Council will be better able to evaluate who has the stronger environmental proposal. Although commissioners debated whether the data for the 2b metric was difficult to gather or not, a majority believed that it would be worth the effort to try to obtain it so that the environmental criterion of the RFP could be quantified. Because the price offered by the second ranked proposer is substantially better than that of the first ranked proposer, more than a subjective analysis of the environmental criterion in the RFP must be made. There is time to do further analysis, for example the Golden Valley City Council made their decision in Oct. 2011 as to which vendor would be awarded their recycling contract, that contract was to begin only in 3 month later, that was to begin in January 2012.. The Golden Valley decision resulted in a change of vendors. Justification for a 5 year Bid: The technology is rapidly evolving and a shorter contract of 5 years would allow Edina to take advantage new technologies. It is recognized that as the contract term length is shortened, the bid price may rise. Justification for Facility Tour: City Council members should tour the Material Recycling Facility (MRF) of both the top two proposers given that with two top proposers there is at least a 50% chance that the contract will change vendors. Council should be comfortable with the winning proposer. C �^ Solvei Wilmot 31 From: Sierks, Bill (MPCA) <bill.sierks @state.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:19 PM To: Solvei Wilmot; Sarah.F.Zarrin @Seagate.com; Dianne Plunkett Latham; Scott Neal Cc: John Heer Subject: RE: EEC RFP Discussion Proposal 5 15 2012.docx One final email on this — Sarah, could you please make clear if you have the opportunity to speak tonight that the full EEC did approve the four recommendations in the attachment that is in their packet, but that the additional information in the attachment was added by three commissioners — it is not a summary of the views of all EEC members discussed on Thursday; the full EEC,has not had the opportunity to discuss or approve this information. I want to make sure we are accurate and don't give the impression the full documentcrepresents the EEC position. Thanks for doing that. Bill From: Sierks, Bill (MPCA) Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:36 PM To: 'Solvei Wilmot; 'Sarah. F.Zarrin @Seagate.com'; 'Dianne Plunkett Latham' Cc: 'John:Heer' Subject: FW: EEC RFP Discussion Proposal 5 15 2012.docx Importance: High Good afternoon —As chair of EEC, this is my effort to give my understanding and hopefully list the facts that both staff and the RSW commissioners can agree on for presenting to council tonight. I didn't participate in the RFP development or evaluation, and have not had the opportunity to listen to the meeting tape, so this is based on my own recollection of the discussion at the 5.10.12 EEC meeting and events thereafter. I cannot attend the meeting but hope that we all agree as to what the above attachment that Commissioner Zarrin has requested to be added to the council materials represents: 1. At the EEC meeting, two motions relating to the RFP were approved by the EEC — a. The first motion supported presenting the following recommendation to Council for Tuesday's May 8 meeting: L 'Council direct staff to negotiate with the top 2 proposers ii. Recommend that staff request the top 2 proposers to submit metrics la and 2 from RSW minutes (I don't have the RSW reference sheet with me so not sure if that's the right reference) iii. Recommend that Council members tour both top proposers facilities iv. Recommend that staff request price for a 5 year contract in addition to 7 year contract. . b. The second motion added one additional metric to the first motion, 1b (Again; I believe that's the right number but not certain) c. Those two motions in my opinion are accurately summarized in numbers 1 through 4 in the attachment. 2. My best recollection is that EEC did not vote on whether to include any additional explanation to be presented to council along with the 2 motions. We did not discuss that question and did not draft or vote on any explanatory language to be presented to council. 3. Commissioner Latham developed language that Commissioner Zarrin and I reviewed and edited over the weekend that either summarizes some of the EEC discussion or adds information that was not discussed at the 5.10 EEC meeting but is background history. (i.e. what happened in Golden Valley in October 2011). 4. 1 recommend that City staff and Commissioner Zarrin make it clear to Council that the full EEC approved the two motions that are stated in numbers 1 through 4 in the attachment. Please make sure they understand that the full EEC did not have a chance to review or approve the additional explanation /rationale. The additional material represents an effort by several commissioners, but not voted on by EEC, to provide additional context. 5. It's probably obvious, but it is also important to note that even items 1 through 4 are from minutes that the fu EEC hasn't reviewed yet. Again, I.think it's important to be clear on exactly what the full EEC approved and what was added by several commissioners after the meeting that the full EEC hasn't had the opportunity to review. Council can decide how. much weight to give the different parts of the attachment. Thanks for your consideration Bill Sierks z �rIA, owe MR 0 U. RE PO RURECO M MEN ®ATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. A. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion Information Date: MAY 15, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting: Susan Howl Dear Mayor and Council, There may be a little misunderstanding about my position on bike lanes on W. 54th. I continue to support the ETC recommendation for dedicated lanes. Steve Clark and I met with church representatives last week. During discussion, we were asked what. the church could advocate for. Understanding their concern about losing parking, we. suggested they could advocate for advisory lanes, which were already included in the report as an alternative for this section.. The message I thought we conveyed was "This is the best option that you can advocate for, considering your concerns." I enjoyed my meeting with church representatives and believe that they are truly supportive of biking and welcoming of bike facilities. I know that you will consider all perspectives tonight and just wanted to go on record with my continued support for dedicated bike lanes on W. 54th. Thank you. Jennifer Janovy Sent from my iPad Susan Howl From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Good afternoon, Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:08 PM Wayne Houle Susan Howl FW: TLC Bike Boulevard Project This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist e 1952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 f s Ibiunno an.EdinaMN.gov I wwmEdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing siness Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! -- . .. ..... From: Marian [ mailto :marianmcdonald(a)comcast.netl Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:53 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: TLC Bike Boulevard Project I am writing to indicate that my husband and I are opposed to the restriping of Wooddale Ave. for the above project. We have lived here on Wooddale for almost 25 years and have not observed a significant number of bike riders on the street. Therefore, the need is not there to do this project. Families do seem to bike on the sidewalk and a very few adults without children bike on the street in our block of 5400. In addition, with the marked parking lane, which is a useful and heavily used lane, the street is not wide enough to include bike lanes. Removing the parking lane would be problematic for the large number of residents who use that parking. In addition, removing the parking lane and then restriping for bicycles encourages bike riding and gives I believe, a false sense of physical security to bike riders. Wooddale is considered a "residential highway" to and from Southdale by the residents of South Harriet Park, Country Club, and Morningside. Car traffic is very heavy at times creating congestion. As a "residential highway" drivers tend to exceed the speed limit constantly. This was one of the reasons the sidewalk was put in. Posted speed limits and occasional tickets have not changed this behavior in 25 years. I think bike riding on Wooddale is dangerous and I don't think putting in bike lanes will change the danger level and will instead create.a false sense of security. Bike riders, particularly youth, will believe they do not have to watch out for traffic because of the striping. Leave the status quoin place and.you'll save money too! Sincerely, Marian & Mike McDonald t Joni Bennet Edina City Council Dear Ms. Bennet: 5/7/12 I hope you remember we have met at various functions i.e. sustainability conference 2011, . rain garden tour of Edina and .other city environmental meetings. I write this to begin a discussion with the City of Edina about the possibility of the City partnering with the Brookside condominiums and the Minnehaha. Creek Watershed District on a storm water management project. I have discussed the subject of a storm water management project to some members of the Association Boards and ground's committees of all 4 condominium buildings_here at Brookside Condominiums. . We would apply to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for a grant to help with the cost of redirecting storm water flow from going directly into the Creek from our shared streets and parking lots, roofs and lawns. All of our streets and grounds ( approx. 15 acres) are on a downhill slant off of Brookside Avenue. The entrance to the Creek at this time does almost nothing to allay the storm water Flow during rains and snowmelt etc. We have a bunch of boulders at the Creek entrance and a downhill concrete flume, which was built to catch the water in the early 2000's. We have little stream bank protection at this juncture also. I have talked with Joe Barton staff from the Watershed on site here. He consults with citizens on storm water protection and the Cost Share grants available through the Watershed. For our run -off he is suggesting a combination of porous matting, stream bank preservation buildup and rain gardens to catch water before the full force of it gets to the Creek. There is the possibility of also needing an underground containment basin for water run off. In 2000/2001 the City of Edina partnered with our condominium only (not the other 3) to finance and install the flume and rocks for water flow and run -off. T I am now asking to discuss with you and whoever I need to talk to at the City, the possibility of partnering with the Watershed and all our condominiums on a more environmentally sound storm water run -off project. The City of Edina contributes to some of.this run -off as Brookside Avenue, maintained by the city, does go downhill with no storm sewers at the entrance to our Br.00ks,ide Court street which runs down hill between the condominiums. I will be contacting you shortly as, to the best course to follow in in this project forward. Sincerely, y Nina Holiday -Lynch - Co -chair of Grounds Committee 4360 Brookside U. 952- 947 -0834 Cc. Ann Swenson Josh Sprague May 1, 2012 Scott Neal, City Manager, 4801 W. 50'n Street Edina, MN 55434 Wayne Houle, City Engineer, 4801 W. 5dh Street Edina, MN 55434 Mayor Hovland and `members of the Edina City Council, 4801 W. 501h Street Edina, MN 55434 Carter Schulze, SEH, 10901 Red Circle Dr. Ste 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 My;husband and I are raising our family in Edina and have been residents in the Richmond Hills. Neighborhood for 12 years. We feel we need to express some concerns we have with regard to the Roadway Reconstruction Project that is underway in our area. We have kept ourselves updated regarding this project since the first letter arrived in September of 2010. In that time we have watched the estimated cost of the project fluctuate from $8,000- $14000 down to $6000 to $9000; up to $16,800 and now as of April of this year back down to a $13,000 estimated cost. This in and of itself has been very frustrating. We understand, and the city has made it clear, that these are just estimates; however as a homeowner at the mercy of this project it is unsettling that the numbers continue to change regardless of the direction they are going. It makes the entire process seem rather arbitrary. As you know at the time we were told the cost was $16,800, we were also given a break down between the cost of the sewer pipe segments and the road way costs.. An estimate was made that the cost to replace segment C would be (and has been in the past) approximately $3400. We were given a timeline to complete that work, and in my opinion, encouraged to seek bids from private contractors as a way to potentially save money on this very high priced proje ct. in good faith my husband and I did that. We negotiated with and hired a private sewer contractor to have the work done for $2800. We felt this was a good value based on the information provided to us by the city. We then.learned that a bid had been accepted by the city for the complete project and that Paido and Sons estimated the cost of replacing segment C at $1400. Obviously my husband -and 1 are very upset that if we had done nothing we would have saved $1400 and quite a bit of time gathering bids and information about getting the work done. We are very frustrated that things continue to change and that our efforts to get the work done, which was required by the city; resulted in us paying money out of pocket that we would not have had to if the city had given us more accurate information to start with. We know we are not the only residents who had our work done prior to the city notifying us of this new price. We would like the city of Edina, as well as the city council to consider what it would take to make things right in this situation. How would you feel as a resident trying to navigate this situation? Would you have done anything differently in this process? We would like you to consider crediting us back the difference in our special assessment, between what we paid and what the final cost would have been if Paldo and Sons had done our work. I do not know that the city is obligated to do anything, but in an effort to rebuild goodwill between the city and residents that feel wronged by this process, I believe you should take this under advisement. Thank you for your time and attention to this letter. We would appreciate and anticipate a response regarding our concerns. Sincerely, Jeff and Barb Meyer 'Y 5040 Yvonne Terrace p Edina, MN 55436 1` RICHARD V. FESLER 5201 DUGGAN PLAZA EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 dd '� O-Ji r"k Arm �s a P aro� A wri 1`Mi cup` f fi i c, w. V" �U6'zS. n is Cat��� Q 4 to e'e7\vl s 'f C iv at Rk`M Cohn Zs f Gf4 �� i v i IAT 5� WIA IAG n - Q sCM V� erS' IA P`eAse' a SS o h -Fh�se Corr w. e� �o�� oc �1a��t P VAS-. TELEPHONE: (952):941 -5306 / FAX: (952) 941 -6356 May 3, 2012 To Mayor James Hovland, As you may know, in 2009, a group of concerned Edina residents organized Edina Go Green ( "EGG ") in order to create a greener environment in Edina. One of our key initiatives has been to implement mandatory commercial and business recycling here. Many surrounding communities, like Bloomington, require businesses and multiple housing units to recycle, just as residents are required to do. We do not feel that Edina should be left behind. EGG has been in regular contact with Edina's Environment & Energy Commission ( "EEC ") relative to this matter. We have made presentations to both the EEC and its Solid Waste Committee outlining the benefits of mandatory business recycling, including the cost savings and other advantages to businesses located in Edina. The EEC initially told EGG that it could not act on commercial recycling because it was not on the list of recommended practices for Green Step Cities. However, after EGG shared with Green Step Cities our concerns relative to business recycling, it was added to those recommendations in December 2011. We understand, however, that currently only residential recycling is within the purview of the ECC. Therefore, this letter is to respectfully request that the Edina City Council add commercial recycling to EEC jurisdiction and / or request that the EEC conduct a study of this matter in order to make a recommendation to Council. By working together, we hope to continue to improve the environment in Edina as a leading Minnesota city. Your attention to this issue is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, Members of Edina Go Green Edinagogreena- g mail. com Ma Werbalowsky Louann Waddick M Davidson e'9 a Sarah arnn C Aileen Foley Laura Davis elb hestler ,Susan Howl Subject: 54th /Wooddale bike project Council members, It has Come to my attention that 54th and Wooddale might be converted into a 1 lane road with bike lanes. I hope that I understand the project correctly. I love the idea of bike /walking paths and like that council is looking at reducing traffic in creative ways. However, I oppose 1 lane of traffic for north and southbound drivers on Wooddale and east /west traffic on 54th I oppose such a change as I fear it would be dangerous to drivers and bikers. Isn't there already a bike path and a sidewalk on Wooddale? Is there a way to make the current bike lane safer and keep two way traffic? What about all the parked' cars on those roads? Wooddale in particular is a well traveled road, especially for families going to and from Southview, Concord, the community center and Normandale. Would the city widen the roads? What `about the creek? How would a driver on a one lane road determine who has the right of way? How do you alternate cars without pulling off the one lane into a bike lane? What would the school buses and trucks do? Using the bike lanes to travel as suggested sounds like a catastrophe waiting to happen - -a car may pull into the bike lane to avoid the oncoming car and hit a biker in their blind spot. I also believe drivers would simply drive through the less traveled side streets surrounding Wooddale to avoid the one lane, therefore increasing their traffic and endangering those neighborhood children where there are no sidewalks or bike paths, It's already difficult traveling on two way residential side streets around Wooddale with parked cars and constant construction. Drivers have a hard enough time with the roundabouts by the Galleria without adding bikers into the mix. And they have only 1 traffic direction. Almost every time I go over there I have someone pulling into one of the roundabouts incorrectly. People are always in a hurry and always on their phone! Again,, I love the idea of having a biking and walking city. It's why I chose live so close to 50th and France. I'm just not sold on 1 lane of traffic. I would rather see the city spend money installing more sidewalks or raised speed bumps next to the existing bike lanes to keep cars from moving, into the bike lanes. OrIhow about trying this bike project on a smaller scale on a less traveled route and tie it into existing bike paths or the trail system? Thanks for reading my concerns and thank you for serving our community! Andie Schieffert 5044 Juanita Avenue Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 69, 2612 Oo AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Bike Improvements Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist. h� 952 927 -8861 i Fax 952- 826 -6389 l ! IbiunnoCn?EdmaMN.aov 1 �,nvw.EdinaMN go_v l cis Living, 1_carning, Raisins; l mndi" Doing 13u�ilwss Please make note of my new email address., Cm ,'t From: demosh @aol.com fmailto:demosh @aol.coml' Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:04 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Bike Improvements, Edina City Council, have received the notice about the public hearing on May 15, 2012 and I thank you. My recommendation mayfiot be exactly on the topic that will be discussed. I always wanted to bring my idea about Pamela Park for some time. couldn't come . when there was a public hearing about this Park. I would love to see a "bike and walkers path" around the Pemela Park. Sincerely, Demos P. Hadjiyanis, 6001 Fairfax Ave. Edina, MN 55424, i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 09; 2012 8:23 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Linden Hills Festival Lynette Biunno, Receptionist t,itry 952-927-88611 Fax 952-826-0389 �( I IbiunnoCci Edina MN.gov 11nnv.EdinaMN:4ov I-or Livin", I,e a nine: Itaking Families &. Doing Business Please make note of my new email address., 1A."e*'I : a do'ti /1Y1 %'.'nrking lo ninke the heai:hv c:llcmce ille r, asy -Wi i e' From: Christopher Maddox [ nlailto :christopherniaddox @ydhoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09; 2012 3:16 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Linden Hills Festival Dear Mayor Hovland: The Linden Hills Neighborhood Council is hosting the 36th annual Linden I lills Festival between I I am and 5 pm on May 20 at Linden Hills Park, located at 43rd and Upton in Minneapolis. Activities include the art fair, live music and cnicrtainment, as well as the popular Silent Auction. Further information can be found at %v %v%v.lindenhills.org hope that you'll mark your calendar. It would be lovely to see you there! Christopher Maddox IJ INC Communications Chair 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 8:26 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Help locating Proposed Plans for Bike Blvd Improvement No A -238 Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 -927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 I Ibiunno @( _dinaWaov I w_vnv EdinaMN.eov .—For. hiving, Learning, !wising Families & Doing l3usine:s Please make note of my new email address. V,!e're a do.town .- wo;rk n.t to rnak,o Iho healthy Choict� 411• easy clioiC:;' From: Newell, Meg Lmailto :Mea.Newell @tennantco.coml Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 7:19 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Help locating Proposed Plans for Bike Blvd Improvement No A -238 Good morning. I received a notice of Public Hearing regarding the above - referenced proposed improvement this week. The link to the plans provided in the notice is either not active or not correct. I tried searching for the plans through the city website but still do not find the plans. Would you kindly either send me an active link or an attachment with the plans? If the link in the letter is incorrect will that affect the validity of the notice and comment period for purposes of the public discussion next Tuesday? Thank you, Meg Newell Meg Grace Newell I Senior Legal Counsel I www.teniiantco.com T: 763.540.1343 1 F: 763.765.9376 701 North Lilac Drive, P.O. Box 1.452, Minneapolis, MN 55440 -1452 Tennant Company I Creating a cleaner, safer, healthier world. ,Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 8:27 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nevermind but one additional request for information Good morning, This message has been.forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno EdinaMN.gov I vnvw.EdinaMN:gov Living, Learning, ltaisill ; I:amilics Doing PIIAl ..:> Please make note of my new email address. ....,.,! From: Newell, Meg [ mai Ito: Meg. Newel I(obtennantco.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 7:45 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Nevermind but one additional request for information I tried searching again without abbreviating "boulevard" to "Blvd" and found the plans! Unfortunately I still do not understand them. Can you tell me whether the plan is to remove the parking; land on Wooddale Avenue between 54thy and Valley View? Thank you. Meg Meg Grace Newell I Senior Legal Counsel I www.tennantco.com T: 763.540.1343 1 F: 763.765.9376 701. North Lilac Drive, P.O. Box 1452, Minneapolis, MN 55440- 1452 Tennant Company l creating a cleaner, safer, healthier world. From: Newell, Meg Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 7:19 AM To: 'EdinaMail @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Help locating Proposed Plans for Bike Blvd improvement No A -238 Good morning. 1 received a notice of Public Hearing regarding the above- referenced proposed improvement this Week. The link to the plans provided in the notice is either not active or not correct. I tried searching for the plans through the city Webs ite but still do not find the plans., Would you kindly either.send me an active link or an attachment with the plans? If the link in the letter is incorrect will that affect the validity of the notice and comment period for purposes of the public discussion next Tuesday? Thank you, Meg Newell Meg Grace Newell I Senior Legal Counsel I www.tennantco.com 763.540.1343 1 F :763.765.9376 1. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 8:53 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed bike path- -attn. City council and Engineering Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r (� 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 IbiunnoCalEdinaMN.gov I wvnv.EdinaMN.cyuy . F )I I- ivin�, Learnuiry, Raisins; T= :nnllies �`, l.)c�ui l3u ine.S.� Please make note of my new email address. L%'@'f. -, f /P.14'i lli ., t','DI "I;in 7 (D miik ° tite he"11tl'1`7 "'W"ice (ile Ei .Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:28 AM to: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: support for the Bike Boulevard Plan Good morning; This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and COLincil rnember.s and Wayne Hodle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -88Gt I Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov i %=w..EdinaMN gov 1oi Living; l.eniniiig, Raring !'amities -& 1) hg 13i�,iiie: =4 Please make note of my new email address. V.,', D a do,low .. . of kiog to make, the h,', li 1h '.,h ioice. i 10 Casv From: Kari Malek mailto:kari maleWyahoo.coml. Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:04. PM To: Edina Mail Subject:: support for the Bike Boulevard Plan Deal' City COLIFICil Members: I aln unable to attend the ineelim, oil "fuesday the 15th, but wanted to write and communicate my excitement and support for the Bike Boulevard As you likely know, today was walk/bike to school day. It was a worider ul reminder of how incorporating exercise into OUr daily routines call easily yield a healthier lifestyle. And it was fun! 'T'he kids had a great time and you could f -eel the community spirit. Imagine if more school days could start with exercise, fresh air and friends. My children attend Concord Llenientary and we live a perfect distance to walk each day. Flowever, safety concerns prevent me front Allowing my children to do so. For one, without sidewalks we've encountered more than our shareof'distracted drivers off in a morning rush. Additionally, to get to Concord we have to cross Valley View and despite the crosswalk and signal, it's extremely dangerous. Rarely do cars stop or even slow down! I realize the Boulevard won't provide bike access on every street, but it's all important first step toward providing safe travels for our children. "Thank you for al I your efforts: Kari Malek Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:39 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support of Bike Lanes on Wooddale Ave Good morning, This niessage has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 -927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826.0389 IbiunnoCa)EdinaMN.nov I L"Lm.EdinaMN.Uov ` -' ...For living, Learni.nt;, Raising Families & Doing Business, Please make note of my new email address. V,Jv'r8 a do.toe,n .. e:artar !1 (o mak;) iii ,, hj?nlihy 3c; ?ei: the `;y :: h; !(,W From: Mertyce Mrvos jmailto:mertyce@gmail.coml Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:00 AM To: Edina Mail; joniben nett 12 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; 'off shsprague @edinarealty.conl; swensonanni@�gmai,l,com Subject: Support of Bike Lanes on Wooddale Ave Dear Edina Cite Council Members, support the proposed changes to Wooddale Avenue /54tH Street that ,VOLIId add bike lanes and maintain on- street parking. I think these changes would make biking on those streets much saber. Might it not also encourage children and families to bike to Concord, SVMS and the Co1111111Illity Center?'I "hat would be great! "Thank you, Iblertyce MI-Vos 5004 Bruce Ave Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:40 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Wooddale bike project Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Paayor and Council members and Wayne Houle Lynette Biunno, Receptionist (3 I 952 927 -8861 Fax 952-826- D389 Ibiunnora?EdinaMN:gov i wwv FdrnaMN - l <�c l.ivuis„ I_cai rung, R ii5i�ie Families & l.hg i311siness Please make note of my new email address. a X0.1.: sa wo( i n.l to make, tli a h:;<rl,hY - 1)(;ic, !lots easy ch icol From: tp clayton mailtoapcla ty on hotmail.coml Sent: Thursday, May 10 2012 8:30 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibetinet 12(-Ocomcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague(cbedina realty. com; swensonannl(abgmail.com Subject: Wooddale bike project Good Morning Council Members, I have heard about a plan to add bike lanes to Wooddale Avenue and that there would only be one lane for cars. Is this accurate? How much will this project cost the city /residents? Thank you and thank you for your service. i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 9:52 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Wooddale Avenue Bike Boulevard Good morning, -1-his message has been forwarded to Mayor- Hovland and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 i Fax 952 - 826-0389 ;I . Ibiunno @FdinaAAN.yov_ , ww .EdinatvlN.go tiu Living. t,.carnin , Raising I "ilYllllf:5 �` 1)oinI Business Please make note of my new email address. ""olkinn to rn"'31"a the oal0l,� ,.,O,'.. e nsy c= oleo._ From: Sally Schmidt Lailto: sallyschmidtC )schmidt- marketing.com1 Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:32 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2@comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague @edinarealtr_com; swensonannl@gmail.com Subject: Wooddale Avenue Bike Boulevard Good afternoon: As a fairly new resident of F?dina and a homeowner on Wooddale !Avenue (5107), 1 am st.rongly opposed to die Bike Boulevard Project. Wooddale Avenue was not meant fo.r a bike path of this rlattire and the road has too much rraffic already, particularly for a reduced lane width. I hope p�ou will tale the opinions of those of rrs most affected by this change into consideration when you vote on the project next week. "!'hunk you. Sally_l. Schmidt President Schmidt INtarket.rng, Inc. Southdale Ccnt.re 6600 France Avenue. South Suite 67? f'dina, NIN 55435 '1': 952.767.0115 1 : 952.767.0378 E: s al ly: schmidt (ii,sciii-niIt- m;trketinL;.ccym ,Susan Howl Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: As you are aware, next Tuesday, May 15th you will be deciding the future of the proposed TLC Bike Boulevard Project. Our family has lived at 5401 Wooddale for over 42 years and we are in a unique position to provide insight into how this will project as proposed will negatively affect our neighborhood of 54th Street & Wooddale Avenue. We respectfully request that you vote against the project as proposed. We have attended the earlier meetings pertaining to the TLC Bike Boulevard Project on April 12`' and April 19th. After reviewinlp, the proposed plans we have several concerns. The concerns are as follows: On 54th Street the proposed plan is to lose all parking on the street due to bike lanes on both sides From Wooddale to the Minnehaha Creek. Between Wooddale and Kellogg this totals approximately 1.2 parking spaces. The engineering firm Alliant Engineering stated that the proposed plan is designed only to accommodate the needs of bicyclists and is not taking into consideration the needs of the neighborhood. Wooddale is maintaining parking in the plan but is actually narrower than 54`I' Street. Please reiect a plan that does not provide parking on at least one side of the 54th Street. Alliant Engineering stated that they have reviewed this and all houses have front parking. Our house sits in front of the MTC bus stop and our house and the neighbor across the street's house also has a 3- way stop sign. Parking cannot be within 30 feet of the stop sign therefore leaving us with 1 possible off street parking spot on Wooddale Avenue. In the past all parking was done on 54th Street due to the fact that Wooddale is a busy street and care needs to be taken when getting in and out of vehicles. This is significant change that will also have a negative impact on our property value. Alliant Engineering stated that the stop sign on 50h Street located down by the Minnehaha Creek bridge would be removed to make it easier for the bike riders. This stop sign is essential for speed control. Our family has lived here for over 42 years and remembers when this was not controlled and speeding was abundant on 54th street. This sign must remain for safety purposes and speed control. The corner of 54th and Wooddale has a 3 -way stop sign. Everyday I'm out in my yard and I see someone blow through the stop sign. In the past police officers have set up patrol on 54th Street to watch this intersection. If the future bike lanes lead to "no parking" I'm concerned that the police will not patrol this intersection. It is crucial to have this intersection patrolled because of the inability people have to stop at this intersection and the safety of the children_ in the neighborhood. If bike lanes were to be put up on 54`I' street, the bikers will not ride in the lanes anyway because of the road edge being unsafe. As is, 54th Street is a pothole heaven and the road edges are even worse. The entire road needs to be torn up and redone. We understand that plans are in the budget for 2014 to have this road redone and curbs put in. Would it not make more sense to wait until 2014 and come up with a comprehensive plan to accommodate the neighborhood and the bikers at that time? If the bike lane is put in, it will not be until the fall of 2012, which means full use would not happen until 2013 and construction of the entire road repair would be just around the corner in 2014. The decision on this project should wait until 2014 instead of wasting the r� ant money now on a road that needs maior repair. We are concerned with the "experimental" restriping on Wooddale Avenue to accommodate bikers and vehicles. Wooddale Avenue is a busy street and needs to be controlled with center stripe lane identification. Mass confusion will happen if vehicles have to slow down and move over to accommodate bikes and motor vehicles that are passing each other all at the same time. This is a major accident or death trap just waiting to happen. Wooddale Avenue does not have the width to accommodate bike lanes on both sides of the road. Edina Community Lutheran Church is located on 54`" Street will lose all street parking due to the bike lanes. The church not only has Sunday services but activities on several days of the week. Their parking lot does not accommodate for their entire parish and street parking is crucial to accommodate all their needs. Please take these concerns into consideration when voting on this project and please vote against the project as presently proposed. Nothing precludes all parties frorn continuing to coexist on these roads in the current configuration. Thank You, Ann & Andrew Kasid 5401 Wooddale Avenue annkasid @yahoo.com 952 - 927 -6612 (H) 612 -749 -8789 (c) ,Susan Hpwl Subject: Bike path on Wooddale Ave Dear James, Joni, Mary, Josh, and Anti, I am emailing you regarding my concern about the proposed bike lane you are considering putting in on Wooddale Ave. I am only speaking in regards to the 58th street to Valley View Rd section of Wooddale. Whose idea was this? Does he /she /they have any common sense? I am not out to attack one's intelligence but, really? I live on Wooddale Ave. . Wooddale Ave, is not conducive to supporting one bike path much less one on each side of the street. The street is narrow enough already with parking on the east side. This idea is only going to cause traffic issues, frustration, and accidents as well as many other issues (e.g. how will this affect the bus route /buses ?, homeowners backing out of driveways, etc.). There is no sensible reasoning or thought process to this unless of course you are considering changing Wooddale into a one way street. Why not run .it down Normandale Rd /Hwy. 100 Frontage Rd. or even France Ave where there is no parking on either side of the street? Or how about the scenic area along the creek where traffic is much less heavy? Or even looking at some of the streets west of Hwy 1.00 or east of France Ave. There are some lovely, less traffic roads there. Even the side streets on east side of Wooddale would make more sense. If the city has $250,000 extra to play with, why not remove the west bound Hwy 62 entrance off Valley View Rd that ONLY serves to block up traffic on Hwy 62? It is used ONLY as a convenience to those using it. There is no reason they cannot enter from France Ave, as one would have to do if going east bound on Hwy 62; OR you could build an exit ramp onto Benton Ave from north Hwy 100. I'm sure there are several areas in Edina that could make better use of that money. I strongly urge you to reconsider this project. This is just not sensible. Sincerely, Sherry Coates 5812 Wooddale Ave Edina Life is like a coin, you can spend it any way you want but you can only spend it once. Susan Howl Frorn: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:07 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support for the Bike Boulevard Project Good morning, This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Ic 952- 927 -8861 ; Fax 952 -826 -0389 ° IbiunnoCa-)EdinaMN.clov_ I . nvy;FdaiaF,IN.gov . -For Living, Learning, Rai i v Fm)lilie.s Doing, 13u<ilw s Please make note of my new email address. t. a do ,,. o. kir'1) , 3 d''f.E' t11.. s; gl; �! i.'?lzJ�. I,� i -E3;), From: Peter Kelley [mailto:katiel lizzie2@ ahoo.coml Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 8:39 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; 'oLsh_sprayue. @edinareal .com; Cl 1. Subject: Support for the Bike Boulevard Project Dear lklayor and I';dina C AV COUt1C.jI Members, I and Writing to enthusiastically endorse the proposed Bike Boulevard Project for 54th Street, Wooddale rave, and Valleyview Road. AS YOU know, these streets arc currently designated as primary bike routes in the city's c( -.)ni lrehcnsIvc plan. 1 ach of these roadways is important to cyclists. Wooddale .\venue is die key north-south connector connector in tale eastern half of the city. 54th Street offers an Important connection point into :N inneapolis' Bike system. Valleyvicw provides access to the f?dina Water Park and the Southdale Business District. UnfortunateIN!, the present configuration of these streets encourages a lot of unsafe behavior- -cars driving too fist, bikes riding the wrong way -- drivers and cyclists not respecting each Other's right to be can the I-OStd. The new deSign would mitigate thesC issues in an ext.reincly cost effective way. The I3.1ke Edina '.Cask Force has Worked closely with cite engineers, the I dina transporatlon t „olllill15sloll and "Transit for 1,ivable C.O11111lUnItiC5 to rCViCW the plans and strongly feel that it Is the hest design possible, taking into account the needs of all resident, not only of bicycles, but also cars, parking, and pedstrians. It is truly a wjn -win for everyone involved. We sec this project as a key element in the city's ongoing effort to improve it's infrastrucurc for all modes of transportation and to C11COUrage resident,, to be more active and feel safer can their roads. 'I'llanks ,very much for your cons.idcratiorl. 1 do hope that you will vote to support: t:llc. project. Sincerely, Peter 1 {clley Chair, Bike I��dina 'Task Force ,Susan Howl Subject: VOTE to support 54th /Wooddale Project Mayor and Councilmembers. My name is Brad Schaeppi. I am an Edina citizen who lives at 4600 Bruce Avenue. I am writing, you this morning to ask for your support for the Wooddale and 54th Bike lane and accommodation project this next Tuesday. ask for your support as I believe the future economic health of communities will depend on whether those communities choose to.invest in, infrastructure tosupport healthy living,or choose the status quo.,' I moved to NE Edina to raise a: family because I thought I could have it all: good schools, safe community, and a walking /biking community. Now with better schools and charter'schools,`young familiesfruly have a choice between East St. Louis Park, Southwest Minneapolis, or, NE'Edina to meet these needs. The City of Edina competes with St. Lopis Park and SW Minneapolis for the "votes" of families on where to buy their homes. I understand some residents new to bicycling may have concerns, but I truly believe they are not aware of-this "choice" going on today with where young families choose to buy homes. Edina does -not have a monopoly on good schools anymore. It needs more to attract families and investment. Walking and biking infrastructure are the new "good schools" that influence home buying decisions. One personal story (if you have time): We were given a window into Edina's bicycling future early this week during Bike to School day. On my way to work; smiled when I saw 20 grade school kids all biking together to school lead by a parent, south from County Club across 50"' and South on Wooddale, likely to Concord Elementary. A vote for the 54'h /Wooddale project is a vote to support infrastructure that will give Edina parents enough confidence to send Children off to school on their bike, more than one day a year. My son is 6 months old this week. I want a Wooddale that meets the needs of all the community, including a bike lane that -gives me the confidence to send my son biking to school many times a. week. Respectfully submitted. - -Brad Schaeppi Brad Schaeppi CEO & Founder, InvestProp, LLC www.investprop.coni Susan Howl Subject: Hornets Nest Project Dear Mr. Keprios, We are writing to you in support of the Hornets Nest Project at Braeniar Ice Arena. We have lived in Edina for 13 years and have three children ages 18, 16, and 14 who play hockey and have participated in the Edina Youth Flockey Association. In addition, our daughter who will be graduating this year From Edina high School. has played on the Edina Girls Hockey team for the past 3 years. Although it is unlikely that our children will directly benefit from the project as our daughter is moving on to college and our other children attend a private school, we feel it is vitally impoilant to the Edina Community as a whole to have such a facility. We have reviewed the plans for the facility and feel it would allow Edina to remain competitive with surr01.1nding Co11111111111ties and it is long overdue. Many people I have talked to 6.0111 other conlniunities can't believe Edina doesn't have dedicated locker rooms for its high school learns given how important hockey is to the Edina conlnuulity and the history ol'hockey in our city. In addition, the proposed state 01,111c art training facility can be used be many ill our co111n1urlity who currently need to travel outside of Edina diva or to other private facilities to obtain such trainina. We plain to attend the Fdilla► City Council meeting tonight and hope that you will be join us in suppOrting the Hornets Nest Project! Thank you R)r your time and consideration. Sincerely, Mark Austin and Susan L,ofthus Austin 4506 Oak Drive Edina, MN 55424 P.S. I believe you knee- my Dad, Don Lol'thus, who was a long time employee in the City of Edina l ilgineering Department. I know lie would think this is a great project too! I-Ie Used to love to watch his grandkids play hockey and was very proud to work for the City of I.. diva. Susan Howl From: John Keprios Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 5:56 PM To: 'Tara Johnson' Cc: Janet Canton; Susan Howl Subject: RE: Hornet's Nest Tara, Thank you for your email Your comments will be forwarded to the Park Board and City Council. John Keprios, Parks& Recreation Director 952 -826 70430 1 Fax 952- 826 -0385 JKeprios @EdinaMN.goy I www.EdinaParks.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tara Johnson Imailto:twotdis @mac.com1 Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 5:49 PM' To: John Keprios Subject: Hornet's Nest Dear Mr. Keprios, am writing this ernail to express my support for the proposed Hornet's Nest addition to Braemar Arena. I am a parent of four boys who are all on track to play hockey for Edina. I have been to many arenas watching three of our kids play hockey in the past 5 years and am surprised at the condition of the locker rooms and that to add the dryland component, we have to go outside of Edina. I feel that Edina would benefit from this addition by keeping the kids at the local rink for dry land training, shooting, etc. In addition, the locker rooms would be an added benefit to all the players and parents that still have to tie skates. Sincerely, Tara Johnson 1 Susan Howl From: John Keprios Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 11:05 AM To: 'deborah mcknight' Cc: Janet. Canton; Susan Howl Subject: RE: May 8 Park Board Meeting Deb, Thank you for your email. Your Comments will be forwarded to the Park Board and, City Council. FYI, the Edinborough Park pool issue will not be on the May 8 Park Board agenda next week. It has been moved to the June 12 Park Board agenda. Thank you, John John Keprios, Parks &Recreation Director lilt 952- 826 -04301 Fax 952- 826 -0385 F� JKep ribs @FdinaMN gov l yiwuv EdinaParks.com ...1 or Living, L iar niii; ; Raising I :riiiilics .` Doing B(I inks Please make note of my new email address. ;�k;i I to .r;r 111.6 iiE: =i31i, rli +alc t o easy t,ho :;u,'. From: deborah mcknight fmailto :dmcknight7 hotmail.com Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:54 AM To: John Keprios Subject: May 8 Park Board Meeting Dear Mr. Keprios, I just learned the Park.Board will be discussing the Edinborough Park pool issue on May 8. I have to be out of town and cannot come. I hope you will share with board members, the following thoughts. For about 8 years I've been. one of the seniors who takes water aerobics classes at the pool. We very much appreciate the lap pool depth; the heated water; and our excellent teacher. I have some joint issues that make this a very good way for me to exercise. I Hope the city will keep the pool available to us. Thanks for your consideration, Deb McKnight 5617 Oaklawn Ave, Edina 55424 I . Susan Howl Subject: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Dear City Council Members: I am writing today in opposition of the proposed TLC Bike Boulevard Project as recommended by Wayne D. Houle in his April 19, 2012 report to the Edina Transportation Commission. I am not opposed to bike lanes that are properly conceived, designed, constructed, and funded, but I am opposed to this project as I believe it fails several of these criteria. First, I oppose this project based on its funding mechanism. The legislation appropriating the funding for this grant included a very specific purpose, which,was to "demonstrate the extent to which bicycling and Walking can _carry _a significant part of the transportation load, and represent a major portion of the transportation solution, within selected communities ". I have not heard 'a single reference to this purpose during my discussions with city staff; the, city's consultant on the project, or.the administrator of the grant nor have I seen or heard referenceto it in.any documentation or presentations. I have, however, seen and heard a city goal to "provide dedicated bicycle lanes" and an objective to "encourage increased bicycling and improve safety for cyclists I have also heard the grant administrator, state that he would like to make conditions better for bicyclists and pedestrians and make it much safer so it will "encourage more people, probably, to try bicycling ". If the purpose of the legislation, and therefore the grant, was to simply increase bicycling the legislators would have stated the purpose as such. They did not. In my view bicyclists carrying a significant part of the transportation load is very different than increasing bicycling. Does the city have any evidence that past projects funded frorn this legislation have demonstrated that bicyclist can carry a "significant" part of the transportation load? Does the city even know the current bicycle and pedestrian load on the proposed route? What does the city consider to be a "significant" part of the transportation load? I also find it ironic that the funding source for the grant, the Highway Trust Fund, is funded through taxes on motor vehicle fuel and tires, truck and trailer sales, and heavy use vehicles, but the purpose of the grant is to remove motor vehicles (and therefore. taxes for funding projects) from the roads. According to city staff and the city's consultant all of the costs of the project would be covered by the grant. However, I have not seen or heardwhat the on -going costs might be. Does the city have estimates of what it will cost to maintain the traffic circles, paint, and signs? How about costs to educate the public on how to use the new bike, and motor vehicle traffic, lanes? At the April 19, 2012 Transportation Commission meeting some commissioners expressed concern that the new markings and use would not be "intuitive" and that motor vehicle operators might not know what the markings mean. Michael Thompson and Jennifer Janovy were quick to reply that the Transportation Commission would need to reach out to the public in different ways and educate the public. How,does the city plan to educate the public? How much will this cost the city? . Second, I oppose this project based on the design standards that are being recommended. Two sections of the project, Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, are considered "experimental" as they have "sub- standard lane widths ". Safety is not the first thing that comes -to -mind when I hear "experimental" or "sub- standard lane widths ". Could this create liability for the city? In addition; the,grant administrator has stated that "bike /walk street projects" are generally characterized and.most appropriate on streets with posted speed limits of 25 mph and average motor vehicle counts not exceeding 3,000 per day. According to city data Wooddale Avenue is traveled by about 3,850 motor vehicles per day and has a posted speed limit of 30 mph. It's also worth noting that Wooddale Avenue, which represents about 34% of the surface miles covered by the project, would be one of the "experimental" sections of the project. I find it interesting how the city communicated the proposed project to the residents living on, and around, the project route — namely two letters to residents. In the event of a zoning variance the city requires notices to be sent to property owners within 200 feet of the proposed variance. In the event of a rezoning the city requires the petitioner to erect a three foot by five foot sign and requires notices to be sent to property owners with 1,000 feet of the proposed rezoning. The proposed project would drastically change the road markings with the stated of goal of trying to increase bicycling (and legislative purpose of reducing motor vehicle use) and the only notices the city sent were two letters inviting residents to an open house and an informational meeting. Neither letter mentioned the fact that the purpose of the grant was to change the way the road would be used by restriping the roads in an effort to make them more bicycle friendly and less motor vehicle friendly. Neither city staff nor the city consultant could tell me who received the letters or the process for determining who would receive them. City staff thought they "probably" sent letters to property owners on the proposed route. There are about 140 homes on Wooddale Avenue from W. 50th Street to Valley View Road so, based on comments by city staff, we can assume about 140 homes along this section of the project received letters. However, approximately 3,850 motor vehicles use Wooddale Avenue every day so there are more people with an interest in the use of this road than just those property owners living on Wooddale Avenue. Why does the city have such specific requirements for notice regarding variances and rezoning, which generally deal with private residences or private businesses, and seem to have no requirements for notice for attempting to change the use of public roads? Specifically regarding 54th Street, the final recommendation included two bike lanes of 6' to 7' and two motor vehicle lanes of 11' with a reported width of 35' for the street. According to the recommendation these will be dedicated bike lanes as they meet the "ideal" standards of 5' for bike lanes and 11' for rnotor vehicle lanes. However, I took eight measurements of the width of 54th Street between Minnehaha Avenue and Wooddale Avenue and four of them were not as wide as the "ideal" standards (28'4" at the bridge, 30' west of the parking near the bridge, 31' at Kellogg, and 31'10" at the second driveways east of Wooddale). Will these sections need to be striped as advisory bike lanes and be deemed "experimental "? Finally, I oppose this project because it proposes to use funds that could /should be saved or spent elsewhere. Our nation is approaching $16 trillion dollars in debt with no plan to end our annual deficits and no idea how to begin paying down the debt. The City of Edina rejecting a $250,000 grant would be a very small step in the right direction, but at least it would be a step. Please vote against the TLC Bike Boulevard Project. In the interim, I look forward to your responses to the ten questions raised herein. Respectfully, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Avenue Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:18 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Importance: High Good morning, This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ' 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826 0389 1 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.aov I mgw.FdinaMN oov Lmint,; Leal iuitg;'R'tiSiri}; FainiLies l:)gint; l:htcinw; s .Plea_ se -make note of my neweinail address. L = i y From Donahue, Charles [mailto: Charles. Donahue0a bsci.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:10 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennett12@comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshspraguend edinarealty.com; swensonann]. mail.com Subject: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Importance: High Ladies and Gentlemen of the Edina City Council, 1 want to express my outrage that ANY tax dollars - Federal or Local- would be spent on this project. I don't believe this "project' is needed or Wanted by the majority of the citizens in Edina. Further, this would cause automobile traffic issues and inconvenience travelers on Wooddale Avenue which would far outweigh the convenience rendered to bicyclists. will call each of you to discuss this further. Sincerely, Chuck Donahue 5105 Indianola Ave. Edina 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf vx Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 08.2012 8:42 ew Cc: Susan Howl Subject: rvv bike lanes Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952-826-0389 !i[][� | �`��/ .J-o, Living, Learning, Raisin" 1-aoi|ie& Doiux8"^ino+ Please make note mmx new omoaddress. xo'!ovr`... mr�ecxx'"|o"r o.^vu�c/ From: James Frese Sent: Friday, May 04, 3012 10:42 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: bike lanes Hc|loEdina, I live in St. Paul but work in Edina. For tile past 3 years, I've done my best to bike to work once per week during tile Nvarnier."sunnier months. | nxuod to thank Edina for the yi�n�Ocou/ fin C, Ulc biking infrastructure over tile pug |`ewycuo. Cycling oil France, south o[50Kh,uxedN6e treacherous, with tile narrow, double car lanes in each direction, not to mention the spoke-bUSling potholes. But the repaving and re-striping completely transformed it into a relatively bike-fi-iendly road, at least foradulls. Similarly, the very-recent rebuild o[7O(h street has allowed for uui�^i�cuui\yyx|��mmru�oyub�commute. Whereas I once berated Edinaas tile most difficult par( of my commute, it is no\\, quite pleasant, and I oo|nnoer|cc| compelled \o double my life iumxmuco policy during the biking season. Keep op the goodno/k! 8inconh. JamosHrse Susan Howl Dear Edina City Council members & Mayor - Mary, Josh, Ann, Joni & Jim, I'm copying Sara (LaBreche), Wayne (City of Edina) & Carter (SEH). Thank you so much for consulting with LaBreche re: how the City can improve its communication with residents regarding street construction projects. I live on Richmond Drive and I was able to participate in a City of Edina resident focus group last night at the Southdale YMCA (Thursday, May 3) and it was great - a positive experience and productive use of everyone's time. I'm always learning something new, and at last night's focus group I became aware of a perplexing problem regarding the private sanitary sewer reconstruction piece of our street improvement project in Richmond Hills. Although residents in the project area may have felt encouraged to pursue private sanitary sewer reconstruction and may have based their decisions to proceed on the US$3,400 estimated assessment for that portion of the project, other residents may have wondered how (on earth) a private contractor could possibly beat the price the City could contract for the work that needed to be done, or other residents may own a sanitary sewer pipe that does not require reconstruction because their private sanitary pipe had been previously updated within the last fifteen years, for example. At the focus group last night I became aware of the perplexing situation whereby a resident on Yvonne Terrace proceeded with a $2,900 private sanitary sewer reconstruction, after comparing a few bids from plumbers on a list provided by the City and the work has been completed. Given the estimated pending assessment of $3,400 for this type of work, it seemed to result in a $500 "savings" for the resident. When the bid accepted by the City for the project came in 38 percent lower, the picture changed. Now the $2,900 expense for private sewer reconstruction is a $1,500 out of pocket overpayment, because our estimates have altered from a $16.8K estimated project ($13.4K street & $3.4K sewer) to a $13K estimated project ($11.6K street & 1.4K sewer). I agree the City must accept the lowest responsible bid and overall it is very good news that the bid is 38 percent less than the $16.8K estimate. And the City cannot be overpaying private contractors to do what they can do for less. I don't see how the City can somehow reimburse people who may have overpaid for private work they decided to obtain. In this case, those who thought the City should be able to do it for less (economies of scale? in materials and scheduling ?) than they could contract privately appear to be correct. People who proceeded privately obtained some advantages - choice of vendor, control over timing /scheduling /disruption and choice of method used. But it is unlikely to be cheaper! It just doesn't make sense that it would be cheaper! My question is how to proceed next - and it's a communication question! The City should communicate the estimated breakdown has changed (from $3,400 to $1,400 for sewer), virtually guaranteeing any_private repair will exceed the likely assessment.... and allow residents to move forward with better information about their choices. I understand the pending assessment is still $16,800 as approved by the Council, and the sewer piece was $3,400 of that, yet now, after the bid has been accepted, the City does have more information and an estimate available that is significantly different and if people knew, they may choose to proceed differently. I was notified by mail in a letter dated April 5th that the bid was 38 percent lower and also about how to add the cost of a private repair to your special assessment (which seems to be be still encouraging /promoting proceeding with private reconstruction plans, in a way) but there was no mention of the how the breakdown had changed, and.. no,heads..up that people may want to suspend their plans to complete private sewer reconstruction work. Until yesterday I still thought the sewer piece was $3,400 and I consider myself well- informed about this project. It was only by chance that I attended this focus group and learned more about it. Thank you. Best regards, Susan Khatri 5005 Richmond Drive Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 9:20 AM To: Susan Faus Cc: Susan Howl: Ann Kattreh; John Keprios Subject: FW: Edinborough Park: Pool Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Susan Faus, Ann Kattreh and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 l Fax 952 -826 -0389 i' Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov . -For Living, Learnhig, Raisin; Families & Doing StNincss Please make note of my new email address. Vv re a o'o.lo: o ... working to.91(i c (Pe hC"IV%Y choice liL: eas; choice'! From: sdsunny43@aol.com [mailto:sdsunny43@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 8:36 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: Edinborough Park: Pool I have been a Edina resident for 30 plus years. I also am a senior who has had four knee surgery's. The water aerobics at Edinborough pool has been very therapeutic, please consider the seniors in Edina when making your decisions on closing the pool. We deserve a place to go for our exercise. Thank you Shirley Bailey Coventry at Centennial Lakes Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 9:24 AM To: Susan Faus cc: Susan Howl; Ann Kaltreh; John Keprios Subject: FW: Edinborough Park pool closing Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Susan Faus, Ann Kattreh and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno; Receptionist 95:2- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov ( wvrw.EdinaMN.eoy ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message-- - From: Nancy Gilligan fmailto:nancylee4l @gmail.c6mj Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 9:02 AM To: Edina Mail. Subject: Edlnborough Park pool closing TO EDINA CITY COUNSIL.AND EDINA PARK BOARD ........ I WENT TO MY DOCTOR THE OTHER DAY, AND HE SAID TO ME. "NANCY, YOU ARE DOING GREAT.. KEEP IT UP, WHAT EVER YOU ARE DOING IS WORKING GREAT ". FOR THE PAST 17 YEARS HAVE BEEN DOING WATER AROICS AT THE EDINBOROUGH PARK SWIMMING POOL ..... THIS IS MY ONLY FORM OF EXCERSIZE BECASE OF LEG PROBLEMS .......... SO PLEASE... PLEASE........ PLEASE POOL....... THANK YOU......... nancylee4l @gmail.com DONT CLOSE THE EDINBOROUGH PARK SWIMMING 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 2:50 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Comments regarding Canadian Pacific railroad line Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. '< • Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 -927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...F01- Livirng, Lemming, Raisin" Families s`. Doing t3usines Please make note of my new email address. vNe re a do.lo�:vi? ... L^ai lvwlg io make- phi' i".:;a {l3 y' thr. aa; . ;hf;;c: ;!. From: Chris Kachmarzinski .LMailto:ckacflmarzinski a yalioo.coin.I Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 2:42 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Comments regarding Canadian Pacific railroad line Dear Mayor I lovland and City Council, 1 am writing regarding comments made in the April 1901, 2012 Stan Current comments regarding the Canadian Pacific railroad line; that runs north to south through Edina. In the article titled Railroads, prance Avenue discussed at town hall meeting, the mayor stated that "traffle along the r011te could Change and the city would not have control over it because it's a private entity." While that nlay be true I think it is important for the city to keep close watch on the activity of the rail line. I invite you to visit safetyinthepark.com to see the . involvement of the residents and city leaders in St. Louis Park to thwart attempts by Hennepin County and MNDOT to reroute additional rail traffic through St. LOUIS Park (eventually through Edina). There are many concerns highlighted throughout their Nvebsite if traffic does indeed increase (derailments, livability of the area as pOHLItants increase, safety, etc.). i live near the railroad line mentioned and know for certain that traffic has increased recently and it does not run just twice a day as noted in the article. I have witnessed traffic in the morning (8 -9 AM), around noon, around 7 PM and at 10 PM at night. I and writing to make you aware that the traffic is greater than you think and that I encourage you to keep close tabs oil the rail traffic through 1: diva. Regards, Chris Kachmarzinski 5217 Hollywood Rd .Susan Howl pnxn: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesdayj May 02,20122:55pM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl mvoUo:t pxv oum&France Good afternoon, this message has been forwarded to the Mayor and COLIFICil members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist -927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 � . ;'}orlj,nu.Lcn,nin-iknkingFamilies loi,`c8uwi"^m Please make note m my ne�� eniail address. 1��»u"�'o—�»mo m make m�e"»y��r «�eo»y�xw�| Frorn; James & Diane Buchkosk Sent: Wednesday, May OZ,2O122:S4PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 50th & France I just read the article about parking in the paper - please the rarnp on 49 Y2Street south side — it appears to have two handicapped parking spaces — not nearly enough — if there are more they are difficult to see — please —look around — how many senior citizens — Thank you Diane Buchkosky I Susan Howl Dear Edina City Council and Edina Park Board: First of all, Thank you for all the hard work you do for the citizens of Edina. The issue I am concerned with is the potential closing:of the Edinborough Pool, and Track. Please take your time with this important decision as it affects many people in our community. As the Edinborough Park website states: it is "exceptional for children learning to swim, lap swimmers, seniors; and anyone who is looking for fumancl exercise." Other groups that use the pool.are the Edina Swim Club, Edina` Community Education ,Edina Adaptive Recreation, and homeowners from Edina Park Plaza, Edinbourough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums, and the Coventry Townhomes. 34% of the population in Edina are people over age 55 and that.includes me. As we age, using a pool may our only option for fitness or rehabilitation after a surgery. Could Edinborough Pool and Track be used as part of the Do.Town with the cities of Bloomington, Richfield, and Edina? As Mayor Hovland states on the City of Edina website;."we believe healthy communities are strong communities but barriers to healthy living are everywhere." The closing of'the Edinborough Pool and Track would be a barrier. ;To increase revenue /use of the pool and. track could it be promoted in the Edina Sun, Edina Magazine, and About Town 'Magazine? Thank you for listening to a concerned citizen. Respectfully, Phil Dorholt i ,Susan Howl From: John Keprios Sent: Monday. April 30, 2.012. 4:09 PM To: 'Apple Macl3ook' - Cc: Janet Canton; Susan Howl Subject: RE: Hornets Nest Annie, Thank you for your email. Your comments will be forwarded to the Park Board and City Council John Keprios, Parks & Recreation Director 952 - 826 -0430 1 Fax 952- 826 -0385 JKehrios @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaParks.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original, Message - - - -- From: Apple MacBook fmailto :anniemeyei,(cacorrlcast.netl Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 3:59 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Hornet's Nest Mr. Keprios - am writing in support of the creation of the Hornet's Nest. Our son Paul Meyer has played hockey in the Edina system starting with the Mite program. He just completed his second year as a Bantam A player and is going to enter the high school system next year. My husband Rich and I support the Hornet's Nest. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. (hank you. Annie Meyer Cell: 612.518.0113 anniemever@tomcast.net Sent from my Whone 1 Susan Howl From: John Keprios Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:17 PM To: 'cjvabrahamson @comcast.net' Cc: Janet Canton; Susan Howl Subject: RE: Hornets Nest Support Chuck and Charlotte, Thank you for your email. Your comments will be forwarded to the Park Board and City Council. John Keprios, Parks & Recreation Director 952- 826.04301 Fax 952 -826 -0385 ;. �. JKeorios(a?EdinaMN.4ov I vnvw.EdinaParks.com Fear Living, Lonrning, Raring Families & Doing 1341sines: Please make note of my new email address. ,1e're a do.tt-wn .., r3;, king t;> 3n.:fifi the hez tt;y choice th ;easy choiro! From: cjva bra hamsonn con cast.net mailto :c'vabi-ahamson@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:14 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Hornets Nest Support John: We are writing to let you know we whole heartedly believe in the Hornets nest project at Braemar. As long time residents of Edina with all three kids playing hockey we know the value of the sport in terms of development, maturity, leadership, friendships and fun. While it is unlikely that any of our kids will use the Hornets Nets due to it not being completed until they are finished competing in hockey at Edina, we fully support this endeavor as a positive contribution to Edina hockey and the community overall. Sincerely, Chuck and Charlotte Abrahamson Susan Howl From: innaci@aol.com [mailto:innaci0)aol.com1 Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 3:57 PM To: Edina Mail' Subject: Street sign and Edinborough Hello Jim ltovland_ Glad You could join the group at Health l=air SaW'dc 7y and pulled C'Ut your Edina notepad when I asked again about installing a directional Sign Up Veiluy View Road just Snuth Of Creek Valley Road (when I last mentioned' it a year ago 0, 'a citizens meeting at the Senior Center, you agreed it was a good idea} - HIGH SCHOOL.:' 'MIDDI...E SCI - 1001... PAC A [arrow) with an arrovv beneath the lettering pointing UP the hill. I` saw a plain BIG black letters on backcdrorind sign for high school and n7iddle sch(w:,l recently ire Bellevue. VIVA, Our neighborhood and residents of other con1nu;i7ities in the are =a Lvould be most apprecialive. And just. a reminder how VERY IMPORTANT are the pool, exercise, 'running' track at Edinborough to all age residents of Edina. While attending water aerobics this rnorning - second class; there w-ps a mother with young child n the ^e"0 ",nee jnd middle -aged citizen in the third lane s: ^3irhirning; and upstairs, someone walking aind son,,ebfle :,ra nl chore. Surely, we're creative and clever crio:lgh t0 figure out hove to keep all and maintain our excellent' healthy reputation, Always appreciate your' listeriirlg, Inna Hays 857 Creek Valley Road innaci .aof_com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, April 27, 2.012 4:24 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed Expansion to Braemar Arena z Lynette Biunno, Receptionist —` -: 952- 927 -8861 I Fax 952 -826 -0389 IbiunnoCa?EdinaMN.-Iov I www.EdinaMN.gov hor t.- iving, t.,iearning, Raising Families & Doing I3USh •s: Please make note of my new email address. "VOe- a do.tov n ... v,or!;ing to mm(, u)e From: Julie Eide [mailto:JEIDE10comcast.netj Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 4:09 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennett12(d)comcast.net; Mary Brindle; jos_hspr�jgr!e.(?edi.nare lty.com; swensonannl(a,gmail.com; John Keprios; heady @traditionllc.com Subject: Proposed Expansion to Braemar Arena Dear Edina City Council Members: I can't tell you how excited I was several months ago when I heard the first rumblings that EJ Anderson and some other people were working on a proposal to put before the city regarding expanding Braemar Arena to include among other things, new locker rooms for the teams, a training area for off ice training etc etc. I have been a resident of Edina for over 20 years and all three of my children grew up in the Edina Hockey youth program and then went on to play high school hockey and some college hockey. My daughter currently plays on the Edina Girls Varsity team. I can't begin to tell you what hockey has meant to our family and what it has brought to my children. You know the saying, "it takes a village to raise a child ". Well,l the Edina hockey community certainly helped raise my children, from the coaches, to the parents, volunteers... it helped teach them about teamwork, leadership, sportsmanship, respect, conflict resolution as well as developing their individual hockey skills. However, I will say that as my children got older we had to seek out different training facilities and venues to help them continue their development because Braemar wasn't equipped with all the necessary facilities to make that happen. Not every family is able to do that. Edina is such a vibrant community with so many people passionate about the sport of hockey, I believe it only makes sense to update the Braemar facility so it can continue the long tradition of turning out amazing young athletes of character and talent. With the Braernar expansion, even more kids of varying athletic ability who want to play hockey will be given that chance to explore their potential and find a spot that is just right for them. Edina is known for it's high quality schools, it's amazing volunteer programs that contribute to a vibrant community. Let's add an amazing skating facility on to that list!!! Thank you for your time and consideration. The Eide Family Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 8:52 AM. To Susan Faus cc: Susan Flowl; Ann Kattreh; John Keprios Subject: FW: Park and recreation department Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Susan Faus, Anh\Kattreh and John Ke.prios Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 552-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ib:iitnno @FdinaMN_gov I www.E-qinaM N.gov _ ...Fo`r Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message - - - - -- From: Lois Velasco fmailto :loisvelasco @mac.coml Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 11:02 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Park and recreation department Please forward this to the appropriate department. Dear Parks and Recreation Department: I am a resident living in the Dewey Hills,area. I also participate in the Edina water programs at Edinborough. I have followed with interest the attempts of Edina to gather together with Richfield and Bloomington to give us a healthier community with organized activities. That is your plan on the one hand but on the.other, you are debating removing programs that benefit,the most, citizens that are either handicapped, aged or physically unable to start their "trip to health" on terra firma. The water enables many people who are not easily mobile to exercise. Along with these people are the swimmers and folks using the gym above the pool. I do not understand the thoughts of closing this`area whilst expounding on community health. I hope you will reconsider this idea. Sincerely, Lois Velasco Edina Resident Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 9:01 AM To: Bevlin Jennings; Bill Sierks; Bob Gubrud; Julie Risser; Keith Kostuch (kostuch.eec @gmail.com); M. Germana Paterlini; Paul Thompson; Sarah Zarrin; Surya lyer; Susan Sheridan Tucker; Tara Gupta Cc: Susan Howl Subject: Fw: City Council and Energy & Environment Commission Good n-rorning, This message has peen forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Energy and Environment Commission members. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 52 ` 9- 927 -8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 " IbiunnonEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaN4N.gov . -For Livin-, I- v;irnin;, Naisin;r Families & 1)ain 1 13usincss Please make note of my new email address. 17i18 f8 8 (1U.16`ra, 4': C7i KIng lO I;i C3 ".ti: l L: he da i)y COOKIO Me r`.3Sy''hoie( -! From: Kitty O'Dea [mailto:kodea.mn @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 3:45 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Att: City Council and Energy & Environment Commission A quick note to remind you that the FRE:I 111-C YCL. ING I V[ NT at .II?RRY "S is conlnlg up next Saturday May nth. from 9AIb4 - 1211M. desktops, laptops, flat panel monitors and printers accepted. CRT's accepted, but a $20 hazardous material charge applies (Hennepin County Iee). All hard drives are either destroyed or rurl through the DBAN process. According to the CNET review of DBAN, "use DBAN only if you want to completely eradicate any trace of data on a hard drive." http : / /download.cnet.com /Darik -s- Boot -and- Nuke- for -CD- and -DVD /3000 -2094 4- 10151762.iltml Look for the RED MINI VAN on the west side of Jerry's parking lot. FREE GEEK TWIN CITIES is a 501C3. Thanks Kitty Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 2:58 PM To: Susan Faus Cc: Susan Howl; Ann Kattreh; John Keprios Subject: FW: Pool at Edinborough Park Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Susan Faus, Ann Kattreh and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 lbiunno Z EdinaMN.gov i Svww.EdinaMN.gov Learning', 1Z- ailing Families S, Doing 13w ineis Please make note of my new email address. ;'rr. £, do tus._, __ ..;;rk�i��� t;i>r, �t_� t; � i3:��i'�: y From: Linda Bennetsen Linda Bennetsen fmailto:IbennetsenCt omcast_ net] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 2:31 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: FW: Pool at Edinborough Park To the Attention of: Edina City Council and Edina Park and Recreation Department: I've been informed that the pool at Edinborough Park may be closing. I am asking you to reconsider, as it provides citizens the opportunity to exercise and keep fit without injury. We all know the importance of keeping active and in shape, even more important for senior citizens. I've have had the good fortune of having Kay Zuccaro as the instructor. She's a great asset to your program, in fact, when I first started water aerobics I was just going to see if I enjoyed the workout and then planned on joining a club. But, Kay was such a great instructor I soon realized I was going to continue the Community Ed classes. I can't begin to tell you what a difference the water aerobic exercise has done for me in the last 18 years. Now that I'm retired, I continue to enjoy the benefits it provides. I would urge you to reconsider the closing of the pool and hopefully you can market the pool to other communities (Bloomington /Richfield /Eden Prairie) using the "do.town" philosophy as cited in the 9/27/11 press release — reading that article alone indicates many reasons why the pool should rernain open to provide physical activity to keep all age citizens healthy. It's always interesting to note that the people using the pool are in good shape! Linda Bennetsen 952 - 944 -6590 Susan Howl From: Jennifer Bennerotle Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 10:47 AM To: ED Everyone; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Subject: March Website Report Good morning! I'm sorry for the delay in getting the March website report out. The delay was related to the migration of our Exchange server, where our web logs are housed. The issue was finally resolved late last week. Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of March 2012: Total visits: 120,197 Number of visitors: 48,880 Total number of hits: 3,155,404 Average time of each visit: 11 minutes, 9 seconds Total page views: 309,752 Average page views per day: 9,992 Busiest day of the month: March 28 with 192,434 hits Besides the home page, the most visited page was the blog selection page where a user can opt to read the City Manager's, Edina Liquor, Park & Recreation, Public Works and "Name Your Neighborhood" blogs, with 15,178 visits. Other top pages included the following (with number of visits): Blog Comments — 3,544 Job Listings — 2,822 Parks & Recreation — 2,736 Edinborough Park -2,456 Adventure Peak — 2,156 Telephone Numbers & Contacts — 2,024 Police Department —1,802 Press Release about Edina's Opposition to Proposed Constitutional Amendment —1,789 Permits & Applications — 1,744 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the brochure for new and prospective employees, which was downloaded 9,246 times. Other frequently downloaded files included the following (with number of downloads): Bike Plan — 5,410 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4 (Land Use & Community Design) — 3,079 Commercial Building Permit Package — 2,913 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7 (Transportation) — 2,560 Winter 2012 About Town -- 2,161 Spring 2009 About Town —1,796 Nov. 29 Presentation on the Richmond Hills neighborhood street reconstruction project -- 1,554 Summer 2009 About Town -- 1,192 Street Map -- 858 Ecommerce totaled more than $71,225 in March. Top sales were Edina Aquatic Center season passes, $15,402.51; Art Center program registrations, $7,140; road restriction permits, $5,000; tennis program registrations, $3,213; Playground program registrations, $2,733; Mini Hawks program registrations, $1,924; dog licenses, $1,758; Fab 4 & 5 program registrations, $1,617; parking permits, $1,440; and Highlands Explorers program registration, $855. We have been streaming video on our website through Granicus for several years. In March, there were 1,087 views through 'Granicus. The most requested videos on Granicus in March were the March 20 City Council meeting, 188 views; Feb. 22 Planning Commission meeting, 152; March 6.City Council meeting, 123; Feb. 21 City Council meeting, 66; March 14 Planning Commission meeting, 63; Dec. 15, 2011 Art Center Board meeting, 51; Nov. 15, 2011 City Council meeting, 41; Jan. 3 City Council work session, 39; Dec. 20 City Council meeting, 27; and Nov. 7, 2011 Park Board meeting, 24. We have been streaming all programming on Youtube since January 2011. In March, there were 2,656 views on the City's YouTube channel. The most requested videos on YouTube in March was the segment on Store to Door in the late March episode of "Agenda: Edina," 155 views; March 2012 episode of "Beyond the Badge," 149; "Together We Stand" public service announcement, 127; Braemar Golf Dome commercial featuring "Fred the golfer," 118; "Welcome to Edina" video, 82; early March episode of "Agenda: Edina," 68; Braemar Golf Dome Commercial 2, 66; the segment on the Winter Ice Festival in the early February episode of "Agenda: Edina," 63; underage drinking PSA, 54; and the segment on SWAT vests in the February episode of "Beyond the Badge," 50. A new website is expected to launch soon. Watch for more information about necessary testing leading up to the launch and the launch itself. If your department or facility has asked for new pages; please submit content to the Communications & Technology Services Department as soon as possible. Please continue to tell others about our website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, contact me. Look for the April web report later this week. Thanks! Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director 952- 833 -9520 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 �! J Ben nerolleia, Edina MN.gov i vnwi.EdinaMN.gov t'�>r l..i�-ia�, Learnin,;, Raking; F�amilii °; �� 1.)oin Business Please make note of my new email address. the 3dEii t! 17 cho ..' I. y �u �Reee REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. A. DEBRA MANGEN F-1 Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion Information Date: MAY 15, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is correspondence received after the packets were delivered to you. 7602 York Avenue South #7311 Edina, Minnesota 55435 May 12, 2012 Mayor Hovland 4801 west 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55435 Dear Mayor, It is great to seethe, Edina City flag: and the State of.Minnesota flag flying along side the United States flag in Edinborough Park Circle. I appreciate your making surethe flag pole lengths were corrected so the flags could be flown correctly and all together. thank you for your efforts in getting this job done. Thank you. Now the no Parking in the Edinborough Park Circle needs to be corrected. For some reason the 15 minutes .parking space was eliminated in the circle so that now there is no parking at all for any length of time in the circle. This is a case of government over regulation in my opinion. The 15 minute parking space needs to be restored. It is necessary because when people are dropped off to use the Edinborough Park there needs to be a place to` stop for a few minutes. Also deliveries to the circle side it is necessary to have 15 minute parking space. Also it is easier for people with disabilities to be dropped off in the circle. Edinborough Park has several- activities for Seniors and the buses delivering them and to pick them up do that in the circle because it is more convenient. The 15 minute parking space in the Edinborough Park Circle needs to be restored. Will you take action to make sure the 15 minute parking space in the Edinborough Park Circle is restored? .Parking on the other side of the building is not to be used by you or others with the decision making power on this subject as a valid alternative. Thank you. in e John D. Alt 612 =239 -8179 CC: Scott Neal, City Manager Mike Kojetin, Managing Agent, Laukka Management, Inc. Susan Howl Mr. Hovland, I STRONGLY oppose the the TLC Bike Boulevard Project for Woodale Avenue! I have read through the plans, letters, and PowerPoint's. I do not understand at all.why we are favoring bikers at the expense of the local residents that live along Woodale or just off Woodale. The.proposal to make Woodale into one lane essentially is one of the most ridiculous' proposals I have heard given the traffic and use of Woodale Avenue. Has anyone making this proposal driven down Woodale in the morning hours as residents and children drive to work or take the bus to school? If they had, I don't know how; they could even make this recommendation. I have no doubt.that.it will cause- unnecessary delays in travel around the Focal area and will become more dangerous for bikers as drivers get aggravated.with the constant delays.. We don't need a "test" to understand, this. I live just on Golf - Terrace about 200 ft from Woodale-Avenue. Despite numerous complaints, we continue to see many vehicles on Golf Terrace driving at excessive speeds. I am constantly signaling drivers to slow down. We purchased a "Slow, Children Playing" sign for the street area in front of our house so we could feel more comfortable,letting our thre6�_children play in thejront'yard. I'm extremely concerned that "implementing th'e.;proposed Bike.Boulevard Project on Woodale will lead to a SIGNIFICANT increase in traffic down Golf.-Terrace (and;Lakeview, and Oak). I believe this -increase in traffic will make .the street,more dangerous for our children.. In addition, increased traffic levels down Golf Terrace could only: serve to hurt our property values. Homeowners on Golf Terrace pay a lot of property taxes. We don't need or want more traffic down our streets.. In my opinion, the city is trying to.solve a problem,that doesn't exist. Are local residents flooding the city with complaints .that they don't have bike lanes on Woodale? In summary„I don't.support this proposal and plan,on fighting, this plan. Thanks for your time Jim. I trust you will consider. my comments as this plan is discussed further. Best Regards PaulReppenhagen 4507 Golf Terrace 612- 695 -6282 4 Edi na Community Lutheran Church 4113 West Fifty- Fourth Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1432 Phone: 952.926.3808 , Fax: 952.920.4418 o www.ecic.org May 14, 2012 Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council members, I am writing to you on behalf of Edina Community Lutheran Church to let you know that we support the continued development of bikeways in Edina and applaud the City and Transit for, Livable Communities (TLC) for their work on.the proposal on Tuesday's agenda. We have had difficulty engaging the City about this proposal and appreciate the opportunity to communicate with -you from our congregation's perspective. The Transportation Conunission's recommendation to you regarding the bikeway includes a parking ban'on the north side of 54'b Street, with a Sunday morning exemption near the church. This suggestion, while well intentioned and much appreciated, was not discussed with the church in advance. As most churches would tell you, worship services and events are in no way limited to Sunday mornings. It is daunting to imagine clear signage that exempts all worship services: Sundays, Christmas, Holy Week, Lenten/Advent midweek worship services, funerals and weddings. Last week, one of our pastors, Rev. Erik Strand, and two church members, Will Schroeer and Eileen Supple, met with Steve. Clark of TLC and Jennifer Janovy, past chair of the Edina Transportation Commission, to better understand the development of the plans, and options. At the meeting, we reached consensus that the alternative design option of Advisory Bike Lanes on both sides of 54th Street between France Avenue and Minnehaha Boulevard would best meet the needs of the church, cyclists, and motorists. This is also the best option for pedestrians within the constraints of the current funding. (A photo of a successful local Advisory Bike Lane is attached for your reference.) Some of the advantages are: By narrowing the travel lane, traffic is slowed, improving safety for everyone. Unlike with a Sunday /special event exemption, cyclists never lose lanes. Their lanes only get wider when fewer cars park. The challenge and cost of communicating church exemptions through signage is eliminated. , Parking is allowed on both sides of the street as needed. Consistency of lane designations will benefit both cyclists and motorists as they share the road. As we have heard from both Steve Clark and project engineer Mike Anderson, consistency is best. Edina Community Lutheran Church formally requests that the Edina City Council approve the bike boulevard project AFTER amending it to include the alternative design option of Advisory Bike Lanes on both sides of 54th Street between France Avenue and MMinnehaha Boulevard. r As the City prepares for the reconstruction of 54th Street, Edina Community Lutheran Church anticipates working with the city early and closely. We look forward to a solution for 54 "' Street that supports creek use and preservation, protects pedestrians and cyclists, calms traffic, and through all of these, makes Edina a better place for living, learning, raising families, and doing business. Sincerely, Camilla Madson ECLC Congregation President 4,404 Philbrook Lane, Edina, MN 55424 cc: Wayne Houle, City Engineer Scott Neal, City Manager Steve Clark, ,TLC +4 r e Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 9:06 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: L5 Construction Projects - attention City Council and Engineering Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist w '# 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(c.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ss X ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Busines Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choicel From: Jeremy Mayberg fmai Ito: jeremy.mayberg(arsparch.coml Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 7:57 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Amy -Ann Mayberg Subject: Re: L5 Construction Projects - attention City Council and Engineering We (my wife and I) are writing this response to a notice of public hearing in connection with Bike Boulevard Improvements (Improvement No. A -238): We live on the south corner of Lakeview Dr. and Wooddale Ave. As we are unable to attend the public hearing, we wish to register our support of the proposed plan. However we are definitely NOT in support of the alternative plan. We believe the alternate plan, by narrowing the drive lanes and removing the striping, would render the road unsafe given the truck and bus traffic on Wooddale Ave. If bus and truck traffic were excluded, and speed limits reduced on Wooddale Ave., we would then consider supporting the alternate plan as well as the proposed plan. Thank you. Jeremy & Amy -Ann Mayberg h 952 - 926 -1444 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 9:13 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: In support of the TLC bike boulevard project Good morning, This message has been forwarded.to Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno; Receptionist a F;1 X952- 927- 88611Fax 952 - 826 -0389 l 1 5fIbiunnoCa2EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.g ov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address: We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: M F [mailto:comboymf @yahoo.coml Sent: Saturday,_ May 12, 2012 9:24 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2@comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague edinarealty.com; swensonannl(&clmail.com Cc: sarah bradfordmriftahoo:'com Subject: In support of the TLC bike boulevard project Dear Mayor Hovland and other members of the Edina City Council, Two days ago I received a flier in my mailbox asking me to "Save Wooddale Avenue and 54th Street" by stopping the Bike Boulevard Project. In short, I'm writing you asking you to do the opposite: enhance Wooddale Avenue, the street on which I live, by going forward with that project. As Wooddale Avenue residents, parents and children, my family supports this project for several reasons: 1. Most importantly, we support transit options other than motor vehicles. I would be hypocritical if I opposed such projects in my own back .(or in this case front) yard. In fact, I view convenient access to transit alternatives as a plus to my home's location. 2. Although it is officially designated a bike route, many who drive on Wooddale Avenue are unaware of the designation and drive accordingly. As one who sometimes bikes on Wooddale with children in tow, it.is more daunting when asked to share the lane with people who are generally cautious and considerate, but also with the occasional driver who seems less'aware or willing to share the road. A dedicated bike lane would create awareness and, I think, enhance `safety. 3. The flier stated a concern about "sub- standard lane widths," although many if not most drivers on Wooddale Avenue - exceed the posted 30 MPH speed limit. I think it's reasonable to consider that more narrow lanes may slow drivers. to the point that a majority are driving at `or =under the posted speed limit. I am unable to attend the Tuesday City Council meeting that the flier encouraged me to attend to tell you of my opposition. And I'm unable to offer opposition to a project I support. But I did want to voice my support for this proposal, since I will not be at the meeting and it sounds as if voices in opposition will be well represented. Thank you for your time and representation, Michael Franssen 6001 Wooddale Avenue Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 9:23 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Good morning, This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCa?EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! ____. ... ._.. _._.. _ From: tp clayton [mailto:tpclaytonCfhotmail.coml Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 4:29 PM To: Edina Mail; joni ben nettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshspragueCcbedinarealty.com; swensonannlCabgmail.com Subject: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Dear Council Members: Could you please tell me the current average daily counts of bikers and walkers on each section _of the proposed project (54th, Wooddale, and Valley View). Also, could you please tell me the targeted average daily counts of bikers and walkers, assuming implementation of the project, for each section. Thank you, TP Susan Howl" Dear Mayor Hovland and other members of the Edina City Council, I would like to add my own comments to my''husband's email, which I completely support. I also believe the City Council should go forward w' th plans to restripe 54th St. and Wooddale Ave. In addition to the reasons stated in his email, I would like to add that I believe providing for bicycle lanes will enhance safety for all users of Wooddale Ave, including auto traffic. Michael commented `briefly that few 'drivers actually obey the posted speed limit here. This is "true, and.it got significantly worse when the streets were improved several years ago. 'The smooth, wide lanes :are very nice, but they encourage drivers to regard the street as one on which`they are permitted to drive 40.mph or.higher. As residents of our house on'.the corner of '60th and Wooddale, we are very :well - placed to `observe the traffic here. I routinely.see cars dangerously speeding past bicyclists and pedestrians. Because of the location of Pamela Park, this intersection is one very frequently used by children on bicycles and parents with children walking or in strollers. I have observed a number of near misses. I don't believe restriping the lanes would cause cars to any slower than the posted speed limit, which would be a dramatic improvement for the safety of everyone in this neighborhood. Additionally, I have observed two car accidents at this intersection, both caused by speeding and inattentive drivers. Slowing traffic here would help prevent auto accidents. These roads are already heavily used by cars, bicyclists, pedestrians, and the metro and school buses. Restriping will not'add any additional traffic; it will help resolve what is currently a dangerous situation. Please support the proposal to restripe Wooddale Ave. and 54th St. Respectfully submitted, Sarah Franssen 6001 Wooddale Ave. (612.) 308 =2929 ------ Forwarded Message - - - -- From: M F <comboymfOyahoo.com> To: "edinamail cDci.edina.mn.us" <edinamail(aD-ci.edina.mn.us >; "ionibennettlUcDcomcast.net" <jonibennettl2(cilcomcast:net >; "mbrindle(a)ci.edina.mn . us" <mbrindleCa-bci.edina.mn.us >; "joshsgrague(a)edinarealty.com" < ioshsprague(cD6dinarealty.com >: "swensonann1Ogmail.com" <swensonann1C@__grriail:com> Cc` "'Sarah bradfordrrirfOyahoo.com" < Sarah bradfordmn(cwahoo.com> Sent Saturday; May 12, 2012 9:24 AM Subject: (n support of the TLC bike boulevard project Dear Mayor Hovland and other members of the Edina City Council, Two days ago I received a flier in my mailbox asking me to "Save Wooddale Avenue and 54th Street" by stopping the Bike Boulevard Project. In short, I'm writing you asking you to do the opposite: enhance Wooddale Avenue, the street on which I live, by going forward with that project. As Wooddale. Avenue residents, parents and children, my family supports this project for several reasons: 1. Most importantly, we support transit options other than motor vehicles. I would be hypocritical if I opposed such projects in.my own back (or in this case front) yard. In fact, I view convenient access to transit alternatives as a plus to my home's location. 2. Although it is officially designated a bike route, many who drive on Wooddale Avenue are unaware of the designation and drive accordingly. As one who sometimes bikes on Wooddale with children in tow, it is more daunting when asked to share the lane with people who are generally cautious and considerate, but also with the occasional driver who seems less aware or willing to share the road. A dedicated bike lane would create awareness and, I think, enhance safety. 3. The flier stated a concern about "sub- standard lane widths," although many if not most drivers on Wooddale Avenue exceed the posted 30 MPH speed limit. I think it's reasonable to consider that more narrow lanes may slow drivers to the point that a majority are driving at or under the posted speed limit. I am unable to attend the Tuesday City Council meeting that the flier encouraged me to attend to tell you of my opposition. And I'm unable to offer opposition to a project I support. But I did want to voice my support for this proposal, since I will not be at the meeting and it sounds as if voices in opposition will be well represented. Thank you for your time and representation, Michael Franssen 6001 Wooddale Avenue Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday,, May 14, 2012 9:25 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attn: City Council & Engineering - Bike Boulevard - Improvement No. A -238 Good morning, . This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist, 952-927-88611 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno Edina MN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bob Aderhold [mai Ito: bobader @com cast. net] Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 5:48 PM To: Edina Mail - Subject: Attn: City Council & Engineering - Bike Boulevard - Improvement No. A -238 Council Members and Engineers: Thank you for the invitation to comment on this project. I will be out of town the day of the hearing so I will share with you my thoughts here. I live on 54th Street at Chowen Avenue. I fully support this project: I especially like the idea of the traffic circles at Beard and /or Drew. (I couldn't tell from the drawings if either or both are being proposed.) One of my big concerns in the 15years I've lived at this location has been the speed of the traffic on 54th Street. I'm hopeful that these improvements will succeed in slowing it down, making the world safer for pedestrians and cyclists, of which there are many in my neighborhood. I like the signage designed to make it clear that bikes and peds are welcome and have as much right to the road as do cars. The entire project looks good to me. I thank the Engineering Department for its engineering and public relations work on this project - from my perspective it has been outstanding. Regards, Robert Aderhold 3529 West 54th Street Edina 55410 952 - 924 -1039 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 9:29 AM To: Wayne _Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Good morning, This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fu 952 - 826 -0389 ! Ibiunno(cbEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov - ,,.:; ;..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business ,t Please make note of my new email address. We're a do town working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! __... _ _....._. ........ .... ...... ..........._. _ __.. ._ .. From: tp clayton jmailto:tpclaytonCcbhotmail.coml Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 9:24 AM To: Edina. Mail; jonibennettl2(Rcomcast.net; Mary Brindle; ioshspragueC�edinarealty.com; swensonannl(a�gmail.com Subject: RE: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Dear Council Members: As.I understand the project, Wooddale would be considered an.advisory bike lane. Could you please tell me how many advisory bike lanes have been funded by the $100 million'grant? Could you please tell me the results from the advisory bike lanes (including average counts of motor vehicles, bikers, and walkers before the project and average counts of,motor vehicles, bikers, and walkers after the project). Also, could you please tell. me the number and type of accidents on the advisory bike lane routes before and after implementation. Finally, could you please tell me the posted speed, limit and actual observed speed (motor vehicle and bike) on the advisory bike lane routes before and after implementation. Thank you, TP 1 Susan Howl Subject: Demonstration of Service - Learning Friends, I would like to invite you to a special celebration of service - learning that will demonstrate the work of 9th graders at South View Middle School. Thursday, May 24th and Friday, May 25th, 2012 Between the hours of 8 -11.am and 1:15- 2:30.pm At South View Middle School in the Media Center 4725 South View Lane, Edina, Minnesota 55424. Service - learning is an instructional strategy that uses service to meet content standards and engage students. Each of the SVMS 9th grade government students have identified a need in our community, have researched ways to meet that need and then have taken action. Each individual or team created a website to document their experience. Action examples are • Visiting with our elderly neighbors Partnering with staff at Kids Clubs, the after - school program at Edina Public Schools • Packing food or working at a food shelf 0 .Hosting a fund drive for an issue I am especially excited to bring our partners together to express our gratitude for their support and opportunity for our students to engage in real world issues. I hope you will consider joining us. Please let me know if you have any questions. Julie Rogers Bascom Service- Learning Coordinator Edina Public Schools 952.848.3957 julrogersbascom @edina.kl2.mn.us 1 Mark Epple 5336 Kellogg Avenue Edina,. MN 55424 May 14, ,2012 Edina City Council: James B. Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, Ann Swenson 4801 W 50d', Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council Member: My name is Mark Epple and I live at 5336 Kellogg Avenue. My home is located at the NW corner of one of the intersections that fall on the proposed TLC Bike Boulevard Project, A -238. I am married and have three children ages 7, 9, and 13, who have att ended Edina public schools since kindergarten.. We have lived in our home since the summer of 2002.` I completed a major home remodel the summer of 2009: I have developed several close friendships with my neighbors and surrounding community. I have invested much in my home' arid community and plan on being here for many years to come. I am writing to you as a concerned constituent to ask you to not support the TLC Bike Boulevard Project. While the project is admirable for bringing attention to the importance bicycle transit 'plays in maintaining livable'communities, I believe the problems created outweigh any potential benefits. My concems.are based primarily on the portion of the project which. goes from Wooddale Avenue to Minnehaha Creek, although other portions of the project may be similarly impacted by the same concerns. West 54`x' Street. (Between France and WooddaleAvenues) is a,heavily -used road serving motorized vehicles (cars, trucks, buses- city -and school), pedestrians, and cyclists. It currently shows many years. of wear and tear and is in dire need of resurfacing, a fix that is long overdue and seems to keep getting pushed out. I first. anticipated this fix back in 2006, but see, now that it-has been pushed out to the year 2014... Avoiding potholes poses, greater threat to cyclists' safety than not having their own lane! The proposal for the portion in front of my home shows a cross section of 35' wide West 54th Street (the road actually ranges from 30 -32' wide) with two separate bike lanes at 6.5' each and two auto lanes at 11'. wide. Parking would be eliminated on both sides of the street. I believe it is'wrong to take away parking privileges from the residents who live at the intersections along the route. This, I believe, will inevitably have a negative impact on their property values. My 1945 home's "front" door actually faces West 54`h Street and has a sidewalk that leads to the street. I have elderly parents who visit my home frequently and use that portion of street for parking. Edina City Council Member May 14, 2012 . Page 2 Bicyclists already use West 54`h Street and are able to coexist with automobiles. I would venture to guess that they are more concerned with hitting potholes than getting hit by a car. The current amount of bicycle traffic-does not warrant changing a configuration that already works, even if it is paid for by .a federal grant. It appears to disproportionately serve the interest of TLC,.(Transit for Livable Communities), NOT your constituents! Please keep in-mind that we five in.a cold climate and bicycle usage drops significantly during late -Fall through early -Spring months. It seems wasteful and narrow- minded to take away a year -round privilege from people who actually live on affected route to appease only a small group of users. The current system in NOT:broken! I ask that you carefully review and consider the following requests: o Please do NOT take away the parking privileges from owners who currently reside on affected route! There is rarely parking on West 54 "' Street on any given day, so there shouldn't really be much of a problem with bicyclists and cars (moving and parked). The parking availability is greatly appreciated, however, when the need does arise. o Please do NOT consider widening West 54`' Street to accommodate wider motorist lanes or additional bicyclist lanes! o Please do NOT consider taking down any existing stop signs on West 54`h Street to shorten the current sub -75 second drive from Wooddale to France Avenues! The drivers going from Wooddale to France will ultimately get to a red light 9 out of 10 times, so it doesn't really matter how fast you go. o Please do NOT try to fix a configuration that is currently NOT broken! A Please do NOT allow the TLC Bike Boulevard Project to proceed! Thank you for taking the time to listen to my concerns. Sincerely, Mark Epple Susan Howl ... - _..- .. _ . _ _.. -,,,,- ._._.... ._ ......... .... .... . .__...... ..... . .. _. ....... Subject: RE: Wooddale Avenue Bike Boulevard Ann: I am disappointed at your somewhat flippant response to my concerns. Of course things will be different; the only question is how much. What you are doing by adding new bike lanes is encouraging bike traffic. It is my understanding that, in addition to the parking lane that will remain on the East side of Wooddale, the project will include a new bike lane on each side of the road. This will significantly reduce the passing room for cars traveling in each direction on Wooddale. I don't think you and your colleagues have considered how busy the stretch between 50`h and 54`h on Wooddale already is. First, we have the Edina Country Club across the street from our home. In addition to the busy summer season, the club holds functions and events year round (e.g., Rotary, weddings, etc.), so there are always a lot of cars coming in and out. People going to the Edina Country Club often park on Wooddale; it is closer to the front door than some of the parking spots in the club's lot. (The valets even park cars on Wooddale.) Second, we have St. Stephen's Church on the corner of 50`h and Wooddale, which doesn't have a parking lot on the property. As a result, people attending services, weddings and events park on Wooddale as well. Because of these two entities, there are almost always cars parked on Wooddale between 50`h and 52 "d, particularly on the weekends when bike traffic will probably pick up. I believe the road is too well used in this section for "Share the Road" to be a safe and workable plan. Sally Sally J. Schmidt, President Schmidt Marketing, Inc. Southdale Centre 6600 France Avenue South Suite 672 Edina, MN 55435 T: 952.767.0115 F: 952.767.0378 E: sallyschrriidt@schn-iidt-niarketing.co W: www.schrnidt- marketing.com From: ann swenson fmailto:swensonannl(�gmail.coml Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:03 PM To: Sally Schmidt Cc: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us; jonibennettl2(a)comcast.net; mbrindle ci.edina.mn.us; joshsprague(abedinarealty.com Subject: Re: Wooddale Avenue Bike Boulevard ..:... Sally, I think what you will see is not any different as to how it functions today. There will still be parking on the east. Today if there is a biker you would have to wait until it is clear to pull around them. Share the Road is the same thing. Ann Swenson, council On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Sally Schmidt <sallyschmidt@schmidt- marketing com> wrote: Good afternoon: As a fairly new resident of Edina and a homeowner on Wooddale Avenue (5107), I am strongly opposed to the Bike Boulevard Project. Wooddale Avenue was not meant for a bike path of this nature and the road has too much traffic already, particularly for a reduced lane width. I hope you will take the opinions of those of us most affected by this change into consideration when you vote on the project next week. Thank you. Sally J. Schmidt President Schmidt Marketing, Inc.. Southdale Centre 6600 France Avenue South Suite 672 Edina, MN 55435 T: 952.767.0115 F: 952.767.0378 E: sallyschmidt@schn-Lidt-marketing.co Susan Howl From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 8:40 AM To: ED Everyone; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Subject: April Web Report Good morning! Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of April 2012: Total visits: 118,427. Number of visitors: 48,562 Total number of hits: 2,962,308 Average'time of each visit: 9 minutes, 35 seconds Total page views: 265,020 Average page ,views per day: 8,834 Busiest day of'the month: April 30 with 150,310 hits Besides the home page, the most visited page Was the blog selection page where a user can opt to read the City Manager's, Edina Liquor, Park & Recreation, Public Works and "Name Your Neighborhood" blogs, with 14,157 visits. Other top pages -included the following (with number of visits): Blog Comments - .3,921 Job Listings — 3,306 Parks & Recreation Department — 2,206 Telephone Numbers &:Contacts -2,208 Edinborough Park -1,817 Adventure Peak -1,669 Permits & Applications —1,635 Edina Aquatic Center —1,567 Search —1,558 The most frequently accessed. PDF among visitors was the Bike Plan, which was downloaded 10,199 times. Other frequently downloaded files included the following (with number of downloads): Spring /Summer Activities Directory --3,505, Commercial Building Permit Package— 2,889 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4 (Land Use & Community Design) —1,487 "A Guide To Edina's Street Reconstruction Process" brochure —1,485 Brochure for new'and prospective employees —1,371 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 1 (Transportation) —1,313 GrandView District Development Framework —1,109 50th & France Parking Improvements PowerPoint Presentation —1,091 Nov. 29 Presentation on the Richmond Hills neighborhood street reconstruction project —1,000 Ecommerce totaled more than $192,000 in April. Top sales were Edina Aquatic Center season passes, $150,915.45; Art Center program registrations, $8,846; tennis program registration, $3,478; Fab 4 & 5 program registration, $1,232; Playground program registration, $1,116; Mini -Hawks program registration, $1,060; and parking permits, $1,020. We have been streaming video on our website through Granicus for several years. In April, there were 694 views through Granicus. The most requested videos on Granicus in April were the April 17 City Council meeting, 169 views; April 3 City Council meeting, 119; April it Planning Commission meeting, 40; Feb. 22 Planning Commission meeting, 39; March -28 Planning Commission meeting, 29; March 20 City Council meeting, 26; April 19 Transportation Commission, 24; Nov. 15, 2011 City Council meeting, 20; Nov. 7, 2011 Park Board meeting, 16; and late April episode of "Agenda: Edina," 15. We have been streaming all programming on YouTube since January 2011. In April, there were 2,248 views on the City's YouTube channel. The most requested videos on YouTube in April were the late °April episode of "Agenda: Edina," 212 views; "Agenda: Edina" segment on the development of Phoenix Plaza, 107; April episode of "Beyond the Badge," 75; "Agenda: Edina" segment on the Winter Ice Festival at Centennial. Lakes Park, 73; "Welcome to Edina" video, 61; Aug. 25, 2011 Rotary Club of Edina meeting, 60; "Together We Stand" PSA, 48; Braemar Golf Dome commercial featuring "Fred the Golfer," 48,' "Agenda: Edina" segment on a figure skater from the Braemar -City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, 43; and Edina government employment PSA, 39. A new website is expected to launch soon. Watch for more information about necessary testing leading up to the launch and the launch itself. If your department or facility has asked for new pages, please submit content to the Communications & Technology Services Department as soon as possible. Please continue to tell others.about'bur website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, please contact me. Thanks! ttil j Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director . �'= G� '• 952- 833 -9520 1 Fax 952 7826 -0389 JBennerotte ()EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! 2 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:43 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attn: City Council and Engineering Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �+ T� 1'f 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ;, `f IbiunnoCrD Edina MN.gov I www.EdinaMN.aov A r ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Jean Colwell jmailto :ieancolweII13Ccbgmail.com1 Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:35 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering Re: Bike Boulevard Improvement My name is Jean Colwell and my husband Bryan and I live at 5401 Oaklawn Ave 5, in Edina. Our house is located on the southeast corner of 54th and Oaklawn and we have lived here since 1984. I state this to let you know that over the years we have first hand knowledge of 54th street and traffic. I am aware that there is a plan to install bike lanes on 54th Street and a further plan for street improvements in the next couple of years. I was told that along with the said improvements that there is a plan to remove the stop signs at 54th and Minnehaha. I ask that you not remove these signs. I was instrumental in getting these signs installed and saw a significant improvement in reduced car speed on 54th Street after their installation. Also, it allows bikers, canoeist, and walkers to safely cross the street at Minnehaha Creek. I checked with a number of neighbors who all feel the same about the top signs. I would appreciate knowing the rationale of removing the stop signs if that is indeed the plan. Sincerely, Jean Colwell 1 Susan Howl Subject: FK 934th Airmen to return May 18 Subject: 934th Airmen to return May 18 Sir /Ma'am: Please join us in welcoming more`than 140 Airmen and four C -130 aircraft from the 934th.Airlift Wing, Air Force Reserve, as they. return from Southwest Asia May 18 at approximately 2:30 p.m. The Airmen,.who deployed Jan. 8, include pilots, co- pilots, navigators, crew chiefs, load masters, mechanics, operators, fuel specialists aInd other maintenance personnel who keep the aircraft operating efficiently. While there, the Airmen and four 934th Airlift Wing C -130 H3 Hercules aircraft transported people, patients and pallets. Flying missions included airland and airdrop operations throughout the Area-of Responsibility. If you would like'to attend, please respond to this email or call by May 16 so we can arrange for your easy access to the base. Thanks again, Paul Zadach 934 AW Public Affairs 612 - 713 -1217 1 Cnaan 41nw1 Greetings Mayor Hovland, On behalf of Meet Minneapolis, I invite you to participate in a fun project that will help us spike public interest in a major upcoming event that affects your city. On Wednesday, May 23, we will be hosting a press conference to announce the Twin Cities Metro Area being chosen as the site of the USAV 2014 Girls Junior National Championships (formerly known as the Junior Olympics). This will be the largest group hosted in the area since the 2008 Republican National Convention. Your city it set to see a bump in hotel rooms and hospitality spending throughout the Championships. The key messages we want to communicate at the press conference are the economic impact the Championships will bring to the Twin Cities Metro Area and how the efforts of the metropolitan area convention bureaus that secure meetings and conventions create and maintain hospitality industry jobs. To generate excitement for this fantastic score, we are producing a short video to premiere at the press conference. The concept of the film is to include cameos from the Mayors of over a dozen metropolitan cities that will benefit from the Championships with each Mayor in front of a city landmark. Each Mayor will be receiving a volleyball in the shot and then hitting it off to one of your contemporaries in another city. We cordially invite you to take a starring role in the video — it wouldn't be the same without you! The video shoot, coordinated by Nemer Fieger, will take place over two days, tomorrow, Wednesday, May 16 and Thursday, May 17. Ideally, if all goes well, the shoot should only take approximately 20 minutes of your time. Please reply by ranking your available days and times as first, second and third most optimal for your schedule: Wednesday, May 16 at 7 a.m. Wednesday, May 16 at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday, May 16 at 10 a.m. Wednesday, May 16 at 11:30 a.m. Wednesday, May 16 at 1 p.m. Wednesday, May 16 at 2:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 16 at 4 p.m. Wednesday, May 16 at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 16 at 7 p.m. Thursday, May 17 at 7 a.m. Thursday, May 17 at 8:30 a.m. Thursday, May 17 at 10 a.m. Thursday, May 17 at 11:30 a.m. Thursday, May 17 at 1 p.m. Thursday, May 17 at 2:30 p.m. Thursday, May 17 at 4 p.m. Thursday, May 17 at 5:30 p.m. Thursday, May 17 at 7 p.m. Please reply with your choice of city landmark for the video shoot and its address: We hope to confirm your video shoot appointment time via an email to this address by end of business day today, Tuesday, May 15. The edited video will first be seen at the press conference and then be used in our PR and social media efforts through the event. We hope you can take part in this fun project and look forward to hearing your comments. Please feel free to contact me at anytime with questions. Thank you in advance for your time and participation! Molly Steinke (also PR for the Edina Art Fair) Molly Mulvehill Steinke Senior Media Relations Specialist 952 278 3142 direct 612 309 1677 mobile 952 925 1907 fax nemerfieger.com z Susan Howl, From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:06 PM To: Wayne Houle cc: Susan Howl Subject: FK biking upgrade proposal Good afternoon, This message Has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoC_EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address.: we're'a 'do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choicel From: Jeff Nowak jmailto :nowak.iffreys&gmail.coml Sent:: Tuesday, May 15,-2012 11:08 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: biking upgrade proposal ,.Council Members, I am an Edina resident and am writing to express my wholehearted support for the proposed improvements for bicycle traffic which will be. considered at the meeting tonight. (5 /15/2012). I commute to my.job when working in Minneapolis not infrequently, but do the majority'of my commuting by car. Similarly, I prefer to run local errands on my bicycle, but do most such errands by:car due to practical reasons, some of which are the lack of local bikeways. My children and I enjoy riding our bikes together; and when possible, like to do so to frequent local establishments for child - friendly "treats ", but the frequency andvariety of our trips are curtailed by the relative lack of safe bicycling routes. I am certain that those who do not use bicycles will. protest any alterations in the streets which would diminish the size of the lanes for motorized vehicles, but there will still be adequate room for cars to pass one another in the proposed plans; and frankly, with the exception of 50th and France, there is rarely congestion on our local roads. Also, as recent Star Tribune articles indicate, investment in improving bike routes pays off in terms ,of increased bicycle usage (with its attendant benefits for our community) - -(Iii' k to 5/4/11_g rticle)- -and is more financially eff cient.on aper- commuter basis-than investments for motorized travel - -(link to 5 /11/12 article). As a final note, with the sprawl of metropolitan areas, one of the things which makes Edina special and attracts people to the community (such as myself) is its proximity to Minneapolis. Providing ways that facilitate residents' ability to move between Minneapolis and Edina by means such as bicycling - -which is not feasible from the exurbs - -would enhance the value of our location both for current residents and for those considering joining our community. Thank you for your consideration, Jeffrey E. Nowak 6009 Halifax Avenue South Edina, MN 55424 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:16 PM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attn: City Council and Engineering Good afternoon, , This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Wayne Houle. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 J" fi IbiunnoCa�EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov = ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town working to make the healthy choice the easy choicel ......... .._ . _.....__.. _. _ _......_._. _ . . From: kathleen froeber jmailto:kafroeb(ayahoo.coml Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:37 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering Dear Edina City Council and Engineering, It is with fear and trepidation for the safety of all ages that we ask you to reconsider the proposed Bike Boulevard Improvements No. A -238. We have not measured the street width, although we am tempted to, our instinct is that we will run short of traffic, parking and bicycle lanes before we run out of pavement. We ask you to carefully consider this Improvement. Common sense tells us it is unsafe and unnecessary. Government money is our money and is not free money. Thank you, Kathleen Froeber James Froeber 5606 Wooddale Avenue Edina, MN 55424 952 - 924 -4160 1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IX. B. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: May 15, 2012 Subject: Receive Petitions Edinborough Park Pool Recommendation: Motion accepting the petitions presented. Info /Background: The attached petitions were received regarding the pool at Edinborough Park. pew`v�o 1 7420 Edinborough Way, #6313 April 26, 2012 To: Edina City Council From: Rossana Bewick Re: Edinborough Park Attached are 211 signatures of residents of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes town homes whom are opposed to the proposal for eliminating the pool, track and fitness center areas of Edinborough Park. Please consider the opinions of these citizens when you are deliberating the proposal for modifying the park areas. Thank you. Sincerely, Ross Bew Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and.-Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members,of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You,may have heard or read that the City of°Edina,C,ouncil is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise' areas and convert them1nto more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`h at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE -BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE -OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. `TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT.TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOLAND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOR ®UG,H'PARK NAME ADDRESS. 7622 York, �y�, /3.D eesc % 7,6.22 of 0� pQ �G��JEQ 7 Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise, areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 2& at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE. GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR`SUPPORT. . TO THE CITY OE EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK NAME ADDRESS J v "3r Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT, TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINROROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS J y��� . ��Jr► �� f�3 jyopX Out 11.11.._ l � � 1 . • . l._ �i..� ��i[![!�17�' S Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise, areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`" at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR-SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOR ®UGH PARK: NAME iol �j (\Q KYV A �J l 1"PEW11-WENS _i._ ADDRESS _�L.od-a, `lD K< AUK s. r-,16 �a - lie? 7C A72- Ou e-S 141-310 Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20t' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING ` HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. 1� TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK NAME r041 %& 'LpX rL y, v-0 P_ / Owners of Village Homes of Edinbdrough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20" at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO-THE CLOSING ' OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINB®R®U6H PARK NAME ADDRESS ((D;, -'1.f ' oa -m& j 11, r k4l i C r. Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. . FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINROROUGH PARK: NAME J 1 VA PWO ift O YVI -(- 90 NAL-rD .11;l -16'g go, 140- W4 -/ 1�; 2 Z I ILI 101 Q. / Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20'' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH'. CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE. PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINROROUGH PARK NAME ADDRESS 7� asp b�ry I,�u 042 zo '!Mei /lov" 2326,x/ 6-n n _ X7 /,-14- / P% S -), ) 7 >> a 10 Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`x' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINROROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS cZ V 361 Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park-space. — -- - -- — — -- -- A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20'' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO, ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS. OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. ,T® THE CITY OF EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINR ®R ®UGH PARK ADDRESS fl/t' ot 7W) al 03 Cc&D ( (YW .A14 c) LI "-�e','n l Air PILAj-r � d VLd/alealilt-- r` Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINROROUGH PARK: NAME IvAo'+ BlkT -e SQac ber 01 2 oboe ADDRESS 231b N Ni 1,-Aa t. ' It Y;-,z.cQ°. /�_ yam_ _-°.- L, t < < S.- 35 Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A, further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE.BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING' HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. -TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDI,NBOR000H PARK NAME ADDRESS ���, `� !�- (cz—R'R_ 1- v 311 7,/ z1 Y,,,-Z, Xe 31S 17 At 'i� Cal ti o� * V� Q� Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 2& at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING F HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS IV 5c I Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO' OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT'EDINBOROIJGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS A-v\ww5 .16 VIT-Y, '1w. I-) A-Ar -�wy YfA V- &t 1 V&E'2� _� 7(o to yo,—e Av?7- a v\�" 1=1 3 3 0 q ,' s. 3203 Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20'' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS - Z4 N"L G� Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and, Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20u' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES' HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN, THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOR ®UGH PARK NAME ADDRESS Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 2CP at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME Leo U I S 1 +o � PQ/t/ -7 ADDRESS -74 <� ""' ?to3 �C►U(�vi -� �C�,�v� Y�v3 L4 z-0 4-' 0, Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). - You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out-the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20a' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE HE POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINROROUGH PARK NAME ADDRESS WNI Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have.heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 206 at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. T07HE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACT( FACILITIES AT EDINB®ROUGH PANIC NAME ADDRESS Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums'are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City. Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION ,POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT: TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINR®ROUGH PARK NAME ADDRESS S �1 �SGv1 X. ��' c2 �,�,� i #qA I, )EA N. � EA J `7 0 A., h Tj-e? vby y G�Rk zQ. 1 Q �G Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are ' members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINROROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS ( 1 .5 Q \ L1,0A 0 [a b-3 Qom/ Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK NAME i ADDRESS F964id, r 70 Cv: a �d Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A fin-ther discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`' at 5pm. , FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE- JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK NAME X635 t5�6 FMITITI M& Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINROROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS k 11L © r, & b l o kuv,6(otjl� 1) 0 53 S 6 101 6tolb06 A #fZ1 F ti J QA/ Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). .8-ou may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear outAhe Pool, Track ind'Exercise areas and convert-them into more Children/Park.qpace. A further discuision on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 2& at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH. CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED . IN THE GYM ENJOYING ..-: THE' . .. AREA. THOSE. OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW.. THANK YOU FOR YOUR; 'SUPPORT. TO THE CITY. OF EDINA - WE OBJECT- TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EbINBOROUGH" PARK: NAME_ ADDRESS Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20t' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITE( OF EDINA - 1i1llE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM' AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO'PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACT( FACILITIES AT EDINBORO UGH PARK NAME i ADDRESS Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: ADDRESS I-& -') 18 t /�! % Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are;, members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`" at 5pm.. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACT( FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS no G-a- �' n Ci, MaIrt'w.- S q"P � a 44 -Ci's Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME /:\00,7x.`fy C 70e';'— Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20" at 5pm. i FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT: TO THE CITY OF EDINA = WE OBJECT Tb THE CL OSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK � f r NAME ADDRESS RIMMM r , RUT T Mvo- _v 9! Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS Owners of Village Homes of Ediriborough and'Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under'evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council. for Tuesday March 20u' at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY. SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACT( FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK NAME ADDRESS 4- Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: ADDRESS �7� Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20" at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH - CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE "GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW.. THANK. YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACT( FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK NAME ADDRESS Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). . You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20th at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: NAME ADDRESS i�LECir -1 � 11�> jj4� 0� �< Aw S /' �( L 114 r. -73o q ` 710 TO THE CITY OF EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOR ®UGH PART( Lfi —RE � 7# & ID GEC Q — o� D� ('r 61 a A- 6, 6 Lin-T 6 Atl Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20'h at 5pm. n, Zry FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`h at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: IN-26C Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`h at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial takes-Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`h at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM. AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY'OF EDINA - WE ORJECT'TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: D 4_2:V1 Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20'h at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: 1 Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health. facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The,City Council for Tuesday March 2001 at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: TO THE CITY Oe EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE _zabj( POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: / P . DI -to -l-Kue \ tm 1_7 00 jr �o -7 MAO- ��sc- LU WV-- MWW- IIKMWAW 331 �4 tu Lou, 0: g Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 2& at 5pm. FORMS-To OBJECT SUCH-CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT -EDINROR000H PARK: Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. _ A further - discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday 11 arc h 20'' at 5pm.) FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: 0v` IS (j a 1 W Cj e ' LA o, t-j C %A— % — , L.._ .. U , U� '9-0s L e i' ,rl Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`h at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDI.INA - WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK: �V (� !'� J C', W 6 co N W ii W >_ Q Q Owners of Village Homes of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Condominiums are members of the Edinborough Park which includes Health facilities (track, pool, exercise equipment). You may have heard or read that the City of Edina Council is taking under evaluation to possibly tear out the Pool, Track and Exercise areas and convert them into more Children/Park space. A further discussion on this topic is on the agenda of The City Council for Tuesday March 20`h at 5pm. FORMS TO OBJECT SUCH CHANGES HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE GYM AREA. THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENJOYING THE BENEFITS OF THE AREAS IN QUESTION ASK YOU TO PLEASE JOIN THE PETITION POSTED BY SIGNING HERE BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. TO THE CITY OF EDINA — WE OBJECT TO THE CLOSING OF THE POOL AND TRACK FACILITIES AT EDINBOROUGH PARK :. �—°` , Y �o W ¢J N > LLl ^ W Cl- W Current yields Treasuries Agencies Brokered CDs As of April 2, 2012 Maturity Yield Maturity Yield Maturity Yield 3 months 0.04 3 months 0.06 3 months 0.20 6 months 0.10 6 months 0.10 6 months 0.25 1 year 0.14 1 year 0.16 1 year 0.55 2 years 0.30 2 years 0.33 2 years 0.70 5 years 0.93 5 years 1.17 5 years 1.75 10 years 2.09 10 years 2.72 General Fund - Mostly short term investments maturing 1 to 6 months. Construction - Approximately two thirds of the investments are for the Construction Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund most of which will mature within a year. The other portion of investments are public works facility and improvement bonds proceeds and will be spent within the next year. This category also includes smaller investments for Golf Course Memorial fund, E911, and Public Safety Training Facility Edinborough - Investments for the operation of Edinborough and held in a longer -term managed fund. Centennial Lakes - Investments for the operation of Centennial Lakes are held in a longer -term managed fund., Utility Funds - Investments for the Utility funds (water, sewer, storm sewer and recycling) as well as the remaining bond proceeds from the last issue Debt Service funds - Debt service funds for various bond issues,reserve fund for gymnasium bonds, street reconstruction special assessment prepayments. Investments include a combination of short, intermediate and investments held in a longe -term managed fund. HRA Fund - Funds held for HRA projects and debt service. Includes a combination of short, intermediate and investments held in a longer -term managed fund. Prepared by John Wallin 4!3012012 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA INVESTMENT BALANCE BY FUND BY MONTH THREE MONTHS ENDED 313112012 GENERAL CONSTRCTN EDINBORGH CENT LAKES UTILITY DEBT HRA TOTAL JANUARY 9,470,087 14,340,524 1,261,345 1,261,345 13,127,885 2,312,182 15,445,815 57,219,1B3 FEBRUARY 7,406,928 12.933,453 1,267,833 1,267,833 12,644,481 2,015,050 13,954,825 51,490,403 MARCH 7,243,001 12,753,187 1,268,176 1,268,176 11,946,827 2,064,700 14,068,072 50,612,139 APRIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JUNE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JULY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AUGUST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEPTEMBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCTOBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOVEMBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DECEMBER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 12 MONTHS 24,120,016 40,027,164 3,797,354 3,797,354 37,719,193 6:391,932 43,468,712 159,321,725 AVG 12 MONTHS 8,040,005 13,342,388 1,265,785 1,265,785 12,573,064 2,130,644 14,489,571 53,107,242 12 MONTH GAIN 10,620 36,324 11,941 11,941 13,694 7,565 43,210 135,295 12 MONTH ROR 0.528 1.089 3.773 3.773 0.436 1.420 1.193 1.019 Current yields Treasuries Agencies Brokered CDs As of April 2, 2012 Maturity Yield Maturity Yield Maturity Yield 3 months 0.04 3 months 0.06 3 months 0.20 6 months 0.10 6 months 0.10 6 months 0.25 1 year 0.14 1 year 0.16 1 year 0.55 2 years 0.30 2 years 0.33 2 years 0.70 5 years 0.93 5 years 1.17 5 years 1.75 10 years 2.09 10 years 2.72 General Fund - Mostly short term investments maturing 1 to 6 months. Construction - Approximately two thirds of the investments are for the Construction Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund most of which will mature within a year. The other portion of investments are public works facility and improvement bonds proceeds and will be spent within the next year. This category also includes smaller investments for Golf Course Memorial fund, E911, and Public Safety Training Facility Edinborough - Investments for the operation of Edinborough and held in a longer -term managed fund. Centennial Lakes - Investments for the operation of Centennial Lakes are held in a longer -term managed fund., Utility Funds - Investments for the Utility funds (water, sewer, storm sewer and recycling) as well as the remaining bond proceeds from the last issue Debt Service funds - Debt service funds for various bond issues,reserve fund for gymnasium bonds, street reconstruction special assessment prepayments. Investments include a combination of short, intermediate and investments held in a longe -term managed fund. HRA Fund - Funds held for HRA projects and debt service. Includes a combination of short, intermediate and investments held in a longer -term managed fund. Prepared by John Wallin 4!3012012 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2012 General, Fund - Revenues General Fund revenues total $2,043,972 through March 31, 2012. This amount represents 6.8% of total budgeted revenues for all of 2012, which is slightly higher compared to 6.4% a year ago at the same time. License and permit revenue increased $203,434 from last year due to increased permit activity during the quarter. 2011 was also a very busy year for permit activity so an additional large increase in 2012 was not factored into the budget: If the current pace continues for the remainder of the year we will be significantly over budget in this category. However, it is also possible that the early spring weather in 2012 caused property owners and builders to, simply apply for permits in the first quarter instead of the second quarter. We will continue to monitor this revenue category closely. General Fund — Expenditures Total General Fund expenditures are 22% of budget so far this year, which is lower than the 23.5% rate from a year ago. With a large percentage of our General Fund budget tied to salaries and benefits, it is common for our expenditures to be very consistent throughout the year, meaning that most years we use about 25% of our budget every quarter. A breakdown of expenditures by department follows. General government expenditures are 21 % of budget so far this year, which is slightly higher than 20% through, March 2011. The major driver in this category last year was an open positions in the Administration department for the Assistant City Manager, which was filled during the fourth quarter of 2011. Public safety expenditures. are 23% of budget for 2012, which is right where we expect them to be and the same as the March 2011 rate of 23 %. Public works expenditures total 20% of budget for 2012, which is below the 2011 rate of 22 %, and below the expected expenditure rate. The low expenditure rate is due to salary savings from a few supervisor and manager level position openings. During 2011 there were also a couple of unfilled front -line staff positions. Parks expenditures are 19 %.of budget so far this year, which is about the same as the 2011 rate and somewhat lower than expected. The parks department can have a. spending pattern that is somewhat seasonal, and it can vary from year to year and quarter to quarter. Nondepartmental and other expenditures decreased from the prior year due to timing differences in overall insurance payments. We distribute these insurance expenditures to other departments through our Central Services function at the end of the year as part of the annual audit process, so large variances during the year can be common. QT &L's\Investment Advisory Comminee\2012 \Quarterly Update.docx CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2012 General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the three months ended March 31, 2012 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (out) Liquor fund (5) 765,100 - (765,100) - - Construction fund (6) - - - - - Sale of capital assets - 507 507 1,016 (509) Total other financing source 765,100 507 (764,593) 1,016 (509) Net increase (decrease) In fund balance $ - $ (4,755,560) $ (4,755,560) $ (5,110,344) $ 354,784 1 The City receives the first property tax payment from the County in June and the second payment in December. 2 The licenses and permits category includes building permits. 3 The intergovernmental category includes grants from Federal, state and county sources. Generally, most of the grants the City receives are reimbursement grants, which means that if grant revenue increases, expenditures must also increase by an equal or greater amount. 4 Charges for services includes ambulance revenue. _ 5 The annual liquor fund transfer is always made in December. 6 The annual construction fund transfer is always made in December. 7 The Communications fund revenues and expenditures are shown as though they were part of the General fund in 2011 even though this transition did not happen until 12/31/11, to aid financial comparisons between the two years shown here. G:\P &L's\1nvestment Advisory Committee\2012 \Quarterly Update.docx 2 ' 2012 2011 (7) 04e r/ Increase/ Budget Actual (Under) Actual (Decrease). Revenues: Taxes (1) $ 21,494,402 $ 61712 $ (21,487,690) $ - $ 6,712 Franchise fees 700,000 - (700,000) - - Licenses and permits (2). 2,501,600 924,209 (1,577,391) 720,775 203,434 Intergovernmental (3) 760,000 210,031 (549,969) 302,524 (92,493) Charges for service (4) 3,096,264 485,972 (2,610,292) 361,435 124,537 Fines and forfeitures 1,014,000 185,244 (828,756) 159,526 25,718 Other revenues 516,800 231,804 (284,996) 283,708 (51,904) Total revenues 30,083,066 2,043,972 (28,039,094) 1,827,968 216,004 Expenditures: General govemment 5,513,041 1,151,081 (4,361,960) 1,060,734 90,347 Public safety 14,976,971 3,380,410 (11,596,561) 3,234,418 145,992 Public works 6,490,886 1,277,010 (5,213,876) 1,374,016 (97,006) Parks 3,867,268 750,758 (3,116,510) 729,348 21,410 Other - 240,780 240,780 540,812 (300,032) Total expenditures 30,848,166 6,800,039 (24,048,127) 6,939,328 (139,289) Revenues over (under) expenditures (765,100) (4,756,067) (3,990,967) (5,111,360) 355,293 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (out) Liquor fund (5) 765,100 - (765,100) - - Construction fund (6) - - - - - Sale of capital assets - 507 507 1,016 (509) Total other financing source 765,100 507 (764,593) 1,016 (509) Net increase (decrease) In fund balance $ - $ (4,755,560) $ (4,755,560) $ (5,110,344) $ 354,784 1 The City receives the first property tax payment from the County in June and the second payment in December. 2 The licenses and permits category includes building permits. 3 The intergovernmental category includes grants from Federal, state and county sources. Generally, most of the grants the City receives are reimbursement grants, which means that if grant revenue increases, expenditures must also increase by an equal or greater amount. 4 Charges for services includes ambulance revenue. _ 5 The annual liquor fund transfer is always made in December. 6 The annual construction fund transfer is always made in December. 7 The Communications fund revenues and expenditures are shown as though they were part of the General fund in 2011 even though this transition did not happen until 12/31/11, to aid financial comparisons between the two years shown here. G:\P &L's\1nvestment Advisory Committee\2012 \Quarterly Update.docx 2 I. CALL TO ORDER MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, April 10, 2012 7:00 p.m. 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Chair Carr, and Members Stegner, Davis, Moore, Christiaansen; Mellom, Sussman, Anger, and Ellingboe. Absent were Members Curran, Moore and Copman. Staff present was Planner Joyce Repya. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel was also in attendance. 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Mellom moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Stegner seconded the motion. All voted aye: The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Regular meeting of March 13, 20.12 Member Stegner moved approval of the minutes from the March 13, 2012, meeting of the board. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. 44th & France.- Westgate Commercial.Area Survey Consultant Robert Vogel shared the results of the 44th & France Commercial area survey which provided a history of the district' and recommendations for properties to add to the list of Edina properties eligible for Heritage Landmark designation. Mr. Vogel explained that the HPB requested this study in 2005, because the area had not been reevaluated since the original city wide survey completed in 1979.;. Explaining that the commercial development occurred in conjunction with the street car line as well as the commercial development to the, east in the Linden Hills area of Minneapolis; Mr. Vogel ,shared the histories of "eight commercial properties and recommended the,following three properties be added,tos the list of Edina properties determined eligible for landmark designation: 1. The Odd Fellows Hall (1918 -1919) 4384 -4390 France Avenue 2. Commercial Building (1920) 4404 -4412 France Avenue and 3904 Sunnyside Road 3. Convention Grill — (1941)3912 Sunnyside Road Mr. Vogel pointed out that these properties have experienced some changes overtime, however the changes would be considered reversible and would not interfere with the structures' historic integrity. He added that all three buildings have deep roots in the community, yet there is no urgency to designate, Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes April 10, 2012 them at this time because they are not threatened, furthermore, simply the determination of eligibility provides protection from public projects which are usually the biggest threat. Member Davis opined that he did not think the Odd Fellows Hall should qualify for eligibility for landmark designation because it has been altered too much. Member Mellom disagreed, pointing out how the building's original hip roof, brick exterior and window placement are clearly evident. Mr. Vogel explained that the Odd Fellows Hall was built to serve as the community center of its time, and was designed to be changed and remodeled. Member Sussman asked if when determining landmark eligibility for a property, whether there was a threshold for how much change would be tolerated before it would no longer qualify. Mr. Vogel explained that would be a subjective determination; however key criteria would include integrity, design, materials, and also the character or feeling one senses from a building. Member Sussman then questioned the status of the old Westgate Theater, 4500 France Avenue, now being used for the dry cleaning facility. Consultant Vogel explained that the old theater building actually consists of three parcels, all of which have been considerable altered. When one asks the question "Are the buildings preservable ?" - being that the current use is a dry cleaner, it would be very difficult to recover the site, due in large part to the impact the current use has had on the environment/building. Discussion ensued regarding the Westgate Theater building. Member Sussman pointed out that one can make out the form of the old theater from the exterior, and it would be a shame to lose the history of the building. Mr. Vogel did point out in the study that this building needed more research to assess its integrity and if with the other building components before a determination of heritage landmark eligibility can be made. Member Stegner then moved to postpone to a future meeting determining the heritage landmark eligibility of 4500 France Avenue allowing the time for more research. Member Sussman seconded-the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Member Davis suggested that the three properties Consultant Vogel has recommended to determine eligible for heritage landmark designation be considered separately. The Board agreed. Member Davis moved the Convention Grill at 3912 Sunnyside Avenue be added to the list of Edina properties that have been determined to be eligible for heritage landmark designation. Member Stegner seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Member Mellom moved the commercial building including the central two -story structure and the one story wings on either side, at 4404 -4412 France Avenue and 3904 Sunnyside Road be added to the list of properties in Edina determined eligible for heritage landmark designation. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. 2 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes April 10, 2012 Member Stegner moved the Odd Fellows Hall at 4384=4390 be determined eligible for heritage landmark designation. Member Anger seconded the motion. Members Stegner, Carr, Anger, Mellom, and Sussman voted aye. Member Davis voted nay, explaining that he believed the building had been altered too much from the original structure. The motion carried. Member Mellom then opined that much of the beautiful original building still exists with the brick exterior, window systems and hip roof. Member Sussman stated that the social significance of the building is also a huge consideration, and he believed the alterations could-be reversed. l Member Stegner suggested that the HPB communicate to the public the addition of these 3 new properties to the list of the Edina properties that are eligible for heritage landmark designation. Planner Repya explained that the practice of the HPB has been to notify the property owners of the eligibility determination, including an explanation of the advantages and ramifications of a potential landmark designation. If the property owner agrees to the heritage landmark designation of their property, public notification would take place at that time. Member Mellom commented that she found the study to be very interesting, and suggested that some older photos of the buildings would add to the interest. Planner Repya agreed to check to archives at the Edina Historical Society for older photos and report back to the Board. B. Southdale Center Artifacts — Working Group's Update Member Anger, a member of the Southdale Center Artifact- working group explained that since the March meeting, members of the working group along with Marci Matson, Executive Director of the Edina Historical Society were given an opportunity to tour two basement storage rooms of Southdale Center led.by Laurie Vandalen, the center's manager. A result of their tour unearthed the following "treasures ": • Six large format scrapbooks of newspaper clippings: ranging in date from 1956 through the 1970s. • Minutes from. the merchants' association meetings, 1950s. • Brochures with mall maps, various eras. • Tear - sheets of newspaper ads -from the 1950s, possibly 1960s. Ads show various iconic images from early Southdale, including sculptures, birdcage, parking lot animal signage, etc. • Photo album of mall storefronts, circa 1970s. • Several dozen 8 x 10 black and white.photos of major publicity events in opening year (auto show, circus, Truth or Consequences show, etc.) and major art works and their artists. • Press kit announcing Southdale opening. • Miscellaneous paper ephemera. Mr. Anger pointed out that Simon Properties also retains ownership of one of the original sculptures, "Unicycle" by Dorothy Berge, originally displayed near the Dayton's (Macy's) outdoor entrance until the mid- 1990s. It was taken down when the Edina mall's parking lot was reconfigured, and Simon is M Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes April 10, 2012 considering refurbishing the sculpture (which is intact except for its concrete pedestal base) for reinstallation at Southdale. Board members expressed the need to ensure that the history of Southdale Center being the first enclosed mall in the country not be lost. Southdale has played a large role in the post war development of Edina, and since it has been determined that designating the entire mall an Edina Heritage Landmark is not the right approach — recognizing the remaining original objects (the clock and "trees" sculpture in the garden court) which still exist appears to be another possible approach if the owners of the center agree. Consultant Vogel questioned the wisdom of designating the artistic objects within the mall, even though they are original. He observed that designating objects as heritage landmarks is almost never done because there is no way to control them. Unlike buildings which require permits when work is proposed; work on objects do not require permits, thus changes could occur without the City's knowledge. Furthermore, parts of the mall would not be eligible for designation, such as the clerestory windows. One would either designate the entire mall; or nothing at all. He added that designating the mall would be very complicated with only remnants of the original structure remaining, and the owners being from out of town. Board members shared their frustration with determining the appropriate preservation approach for Southdale; noting that the HPB has struggled with preserving the history of the center for years. Member Stegner pointed out that that the garden court or atrium area where one finds the original clock, tree sculpture and clerestory windows is what remains of the original mall. There are also important archival materials, recently discovered that document the roots of the country's first enclosed shopping mall — all worthy of being preserved, and in the best interest of the community as well as the property owner. Chair Carr suggested that the Southdale working group meet with Consultant Vogel to firm up a preservation strategy for Southdale Center, perhaps in the form of a curatorial agreement (also known as a plan of treatment) which could be presented for the Board to review at the June meeting. The Board and Consultant Vogel agreed that would be a good approach. No formal action was taken. C. Preservation Month (May) Activities Planner Repya reported that the following activities have been planned during the month of May to recognize Preservation Month: May I - City Council Proclamation "Discovering America's Hidden Gems" - Heritage Award Presentation May 5 - Community Education class — "Caring for Your Old House — The Basics" Saturday, 1:00 — 4:00 p.m. at the Grange Hall May 8 - Open House: Grange Hall /Cahill School &.St. Stephen's Church 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes April 10, 2012 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. prior to the regular HPB meeting. Board members briefly discussed the activities, agreeing that interesting events have been planned which they looked forward to attending. D. 2012 Edina Heritage Award Planner Repya7 reported that the 2012 Heritage Award subcommittee made up of Members Anger, Mellom and Stegner metprior to the meeting to review the nominations submitted. Member Mellom announced that the committee unanimously agreed that they would recommend the Convention Grill receive award. She pointed out that the.nomination provided good information on the history, of the business which has served'the community for over 70,years; as well as great photos of both the exterior and, interior of the building, including few famous menu items i.e. burgers and fries.' Ms. Mellom added that in light of the recent Westgate Commercial Area Survey where the Convention Grill has been determined eligible for landmark designation, receiving the Heritage Award would be very fitting. Following a brief discussion, Member Stegner moved that the 2012 Edina Heritage Award be presented to the Convention Grill, 3912 Sunnyside Road. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted. aye. The motion carried. E. Board & Commission Survey Results Member Joel, Stegner who assisted Assistant City Manager Karen Kurt in the creation of the Board and Commission survey presented a Power Point presentation highlighting the results of the survey, particularly relating the HBP's responses. Mr. Stegner pointed out that overall the HPB felt their work was very satisfying and they were well supported by staff. Following a brief discussion of the results, the Board agreed to continue the following discussion items to the May meeting: • A better understanding of Consultant Vogel's roles /responsibilities • HPB's presence on the City's web site • How the. HPB can have a greater impact on the community The Board thanked Member Stegner for his work on the survey noting that it will be a valuable tool to improve the work of the City's. advisory boards. and commissions. F. 2012 Work Plan: Objectives & Action Steps . Chair Carr explained that she has created a work.pIan, spreadsheet that will provide information on the objectives that have been identified as well as the individual /groups responsible for the item, and relevant dates for initiation /review /and completion. The. Board reviewed. the spreadsheet and agreed that it will go a long way to provide clarity, accountability, and ensuring that projects aren't forgotten. G. Update on Board & Commission Project Chairman Carr reported that she received an email from Assistant City Manager Karen Kurt that provided an update on the Board & Commission projects. The. City Council has approved the unified 5 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes April 10, 2012 bylaws for all boards and commissions with a few edits. A copy of the corrected bylaws will be available to the HPB at the May meeting. It appears that the committee will continue its work as it takes on developing a formalized work plan and a new annual calendar; as well as coordinating the new member selection process. Ms. Carr noted that Member Stegner had represented the HPB on the committee, and she asked if he wished to continue. Mr. Stegner stated that he would like to continue serving on the panel as they take on the new projects. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS -None VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS A. Member Davis - Asked that the topic of "Recycling Housing Materials" be added to the agenda for the May meeting. B. Member Stegner — Reminded the Board that the Minnesota Historical Society is offering trolley tours of Mid - Century Modern homes in the Twin Cities area during the month of May. The schedule is available on SHPO's web site at www.minnesotahistorycenter.org. C. Chair Carr - Asked Planner Repya to provide a list of the current HBP working groups and subcommittees including information on their respective projects. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Joint Meeting With City Council scheduled for August 6, 2012 Planner Repya asked the Board to reserve Tuesday, August 6, 2012 for the joint meeting with the City Council from 5:00 — 7:00 prior to the City Council meeting. B. Elizabeth Montgomery — 2012 Recipient of Mayor's Youth Commendation Award Planner Repya was pleased to announce that Elizabeth Montgomery, a former student member of the HPB has been chosen to be the 2012 recipient of the Mayor's Youth Commendation Award. Elizabeth is currently finishing her sophomore year at Concordia College in Moorhead, MN. Since her junior year in high school, Elizabeth has volunteered For the City of Edina in several capacities — not only serving as a student member of the HPB for two years, but also assisting the Cahill School marm's during summer camp; not to mention working as an intern to the Planning Department taking on research and community outreach projects. The HPB fondly remembers Elizabeth for choosing the project of upgrading the HPB website as her May Project during her senior year in high school, as well as planning for a tour of the Morningside neighborhood. Fortunately for the Community Development Department, Elizabeth will come back this summer to provide support to the Planning staff. 6 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes April 10, 2012 Board members agreed that the HPB and the community have definitely benefited from Elizabeth's contributions; noting that she is well deserving of the award. C. May 8th Open House - Cahill School, Grange Hall & St. Stephen's Church Ms. Repya reminded the Board that the open house /tours will take place from 5:00 — 7:00 p.m. prior to the regular HPB meeting. - X. NEXT MEETING DATE May 8, 2012 XI. ADJOURNMENT 9:10 p.m. Member Davis moved the meeting be adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Member Mellom seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 7 r, I MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM February 16, 2012 6:00 P.M. New members, Courtney Whited, Tom LaForce and Surya lyer were welcomed to the Commission. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Braden; Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Franzen and.seconded by member Thompson approving the meeting agenda. All voted ave. Motion carried: APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 2012 Motion was made by member Thompson and seconded by member Nelson to approve the minutes. All voted ave. Motion carried. APRPOVAL OF TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OP FEBRUARY 1, 2012 Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Nelson accepting the February 1, 2012 Traffic Safety Report. All voted ave. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None. REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS . Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Feasibility Study City engineer Houle said the feasibility report completed by Mr. Andy Plowman of WSB & Associates, was handed out recently. He said Mr. Plowman was in attendance to answer questions. Mr. Houle said all of Tracy Avenue was in the Capital Improvement Plan for. concrete replacement but upon closer scrutiny it was determined that more work was needed and therefore, the roadway was broken into two phases from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue, and Benton Avenue to the crosstown.,:Additionally; staff is working on a grant for up to $500,000 through MnDOT for the crosstown interchange at Tracy Avenue. Some of the issues are concrete replacement and an offset intersection at Benton and, Mr. Houle said now is time to evaluate making changes. He said Council also asked that they consider a sidewalk on the west side.. He said discussions included leaving the intersection as is or realign with a roundabout. He said staff's recommendation is to realign the intersection with a roundabout which fits well with bus turning movements and does not slow fire trucks response time. He said the roundabout is safer because crossing distance for pedestrians are decreased and when in the roundabout drivers are only looking to the left instead of looking 4 ways like a 4 -way intersection, and it also serves as a traffic calming measure. Additional recommended features include bike lanes to comply with the City of Edina's Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan; instead of sidewalk on the west side which would require 9 ft. of right -of -way, they are instead going to improve crossings; 28 parking spaces; and bump -out intersections. Discussion Mr. Plowman handed out a revised survey tabulation. Chair Janovy asked if any of the response majorities had changed and Mr. Plowman said that regarding the roundabout, it is now closer to 50/50. In reference to the feasibility report stating support from the Countryside's Site Council, chair Janovy said she has received information from the school 1 district outlining the procedures to follow for their support and while the Site Council's opinion is important, she said they do not speak for the superintendent and the school board. Everyone agreed that the roadway needs to be reconstructed and to keep existing sidewalk. Members' feedback is as follow: Member Thompson said the bike lanes are critical to be consistent with Comp Plan. He said also to maximize parking on the eastside and that bump -outs would help to slow traffic. Member Bass agreed with the bike lanes because it is a school and riding could help to relieve congestion around arrival /dismissal time. She also said research shows that bike lanes makes road safer. She said it does not appear that people are committed to parking and suggested eliminating parking so prevent widened of the roadway. Mr. Houle clarified that widening of the roadway is due to both parking and the bike lanes. He said widening on the west by 4 ft. is necessary because of a storm sewer pipe on the east that would need to be moved and would increase cost because of watershed rules. Chair Janovy confirmed that per state law, bikers are allowed on the roadway. Members Janovy, Schweiger, Braden, lyer, La Force, and Nelson agreed with the bike lanes. Member lyer also agreed with maximizing parking. Member La Force asked if Vernon to the north was also striped with bike lanes. Mr. Houle said no; he said this is the starting point and it gives them something to build on. Member Franzen said the ETC should focus on Comp Plan related issues and not on parking. Member Whited said according to residents no one is biking now. She suggested doing before /after counts to show residents usage. She said she has seen an increase in biking on W. 58th since the new striping. Mr. Houle was asked about the bike lane on Interlachen Blvd. He said ridership have increased on Interlachen Blvd which is striped with a 3 -% ft. lane on certain segment and share the road on other segment. He said most homes do not front Interlachen Blvd ano therefore parking was not an issue and the speed limit was and still is 30 mph. He said minor modifications were done to a property near Bywood West to accommodate the bike lane. Chair Janovy said there is a cost associated with parking and that TLC has an article about the myth of free parking. She said based on 54 parking spaces, she calculated that the cost would be $1800 /space and residents would be assessed 20% of this cost. If spaces are reduced to 28, she said the cost goes up to $3500 /space. She said she has only seen one car parked there. Member lyer concurred that he too has not seen too many cars parked there and that most times parking are only needed for lots of guests. He said the cost of parking though is relative. Member Bass said parking does spike but there is not an overwhelming demand and it is used infrequently. Chair Janovy was asked if residents would be assessed less if parking was eliminated and she said yes, approximately $250. Member Nelson noted that parking did not appear important but the 2 "d survey shows that residents are split 50/50. Member Franzen said they should be strategic about parking and balance it with bump -outs. Mr. Houle said this would give visual cue to slow down vs. having a wide open roadway and it was noted that last speed taken was at 36.7 meaning 85% of drivers were driving this speed or lower. Regarding the offset intersection, Member La Force said leaving it 'as is' is not an option. It was noted that one survey showed 65% favorable toward roundabout or realignment and another one showed 77% favorability. Mr. Houle said roundabouts work great because studies show reduction of accidents; pedestrian safety is maximized; and they simplify /reduces risk for drivers /pedestrians. Chair Janovy the intersection does not have a history of crashes so therefore, nothing to reduce. She said there are 10 years of safety data. Member Thompson said it is being added as a component to slow traffic and aid with flow during peak hours. Member Bass said the feel at the intersection is confusing and this is how drivers should feel so that they'll slow down. Member Nelson said he is a proponent roundabouts but leave as is because there are not too many problems. He said the intersection is odd but it works well. 2 Member Franzen said it is functioning; however, the roundabout is safer and a better long term solution. In terms of size, Mr. Houle said it would be comparable to the ones on W. 70th, although traffic volume is lower. Mr. Plowman cited Mendota Heights with similar lower traffic volume, same issue and skepticism. He said the roundabout was built and now everyone likes it. In addition to other features already noted, Mr. Plowman said.studies show that air quality also improves due to less stopping. Mr. Houle was asked if the City has a policy for roundabouts and he said no because they are so new. He said Living Streets may address roundabouts. Member lyer asked about the cost vs. benefit. Mr. Houle said the volume is lower but the roundabout would help with. traffic flow. Member lyer said there is an advantage to keep flow going but the cost is too high. Mr. Plowman said the realignment is more expensive at $240,000 while the roundabout would be $165,000. Member Thompson said there is a place on Benton where parents make .0 -turn to pickup students. 'Mr. Plowman said he has observed this and the roundabout would eliminate the U- turns. Chair J.anovy said this is an opportunity for education and enforcement at the site. She said from the first survey,. 23% said they were fine with the intersection; 58% said it was a problem ,and 19% were cautious. In the second survey 60 %said to leave as is; and 40% said realign. She said she likes roundabouts but not at this location. She said this one should have off ramps for bikers and it should be designed for all ages. Mr. Plowman said off -ramps are only needed on dual lane roundabouts. Members lyer'and Bass concurred with Chair Janovy. Residents Comments Sue Nelson, 5701 Hawkes Ter — Ms. Nelson said she has been resident for 20+ years and a pass educator at Countryside. She said realignment is a better option. She said she loves roundabouts but not in favor of one at this location because it will not help. Susan Clark, 5812 W. 615` —.Ms. Clark said high school students drives Benton to Tracy to get to the high school and she wondered if they will go all the way around the roundabout. She said it is good to consider the Countryside students. She said the school has said they would need additional crossing guards. She said one problem is solved and another created. Judith Rogers, corner of Arbor Lane and Tracy - Ms. Rogers said drivers traveling south on Tracy from Vernon may not see children in the roundabout. She said if obstructions are not placed in the roundabout drivers may drive over it and if obstructions are placed, it may prevent drivers from seeing pedestrians. Steve Enck, 5700 Benton - Mr. Enck said he is against the roundabout. He said he will not have safe access to his driveway; every road is up hill; has hindrance; stop signs are working; pedestrian lane for children are bigger; might improve flow of cars but not pedestrians; easier for crossing guards as is. And, speaking on behalf of his neighbor who is confined to a wheelchair, he said neither of them has seen any accidents in their time as residents. He said only: two ideas were presented and suggested having three or four options including his suggestion to remove parking on Benton from Tracy to the school's driveway; widen Benton to the intersection, keeping the stop signs and allowing for better turn movement for the buses. Chair Janovy asked if other options were considered including widen of the west leg of Benton; near the intersection. Mr. Plowman said widen would help the.buses at the intersection but the idea was to create a design for the entire operation of the corridor including speeding which is a problem for the residents. He said roundabouts are safer for pedestrians because they are crossing 16 ft. of traffic at a time instead of 36 ft., plus four potential conflicts with the offset intersection. Member Franzen said Mr. Enck's driveway does seem to be a problem with the roundabout., Mr. Houle said he would work with him to realign and landscape. Bill Rogers, 6100 Arbor Lane — Mr. Rogers said he submitted written comments. He said 71% of residents on his survey said the roundabout is not appropriate and neither is a standard cross intersection because it would cause T -bone accidents. He said east on Benton there is a pond like a roundabout and a fatality that happened there could happen at the roundabout and there have not been accidents to date. He said it is not broken, they do not want traffic to flow and 3 if traffic backs up, so what? He said there is new specifications in the works for visual impair pedestrians which this roundabout will not have. He said he liked Mr. Enck's idea. Ken Kjelland, 5600 Tracy — Mr. Kjelland said he has been a resident since 1982. He said he attended two meetings, completed two surveys and report is still being submitted as is and not reflecting residents' input. He said he has concluded that residents do not have input. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Bass for chair lanovy to write the recommendation for submittal to the Council with assistance from members Nelson Franzen and Bass. All voted aye. Motion carried. Members were polled regarding the following (polling included student member Schweiger): Bike Lanes: all said yes (10). Parking: Staff said their recommendation is based on residents' needs and to accommodate delivery vehicles which tend to block traffic. Chair Janovy said deliveries were not a reason to retain parking. Member Bass said to reduce the travel lanes down from 11 ft. to 10 ft. and not widen the road. She was informed that a variance would be required. 7 of 10 said yes to parking as proposed. Reducing the speed limit to 25 mph because of the bike lanes: 2 of 10 said yes. Motion was made by member Thompson and seconded by member LaForce to recommend the proposed design as is north of Benton. 7 ayes, 2 nays. Motion carried. Roundabout: Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Iver to leave intersection as is. 8 ayes, 1 nay. Motior carried. Member Thompson said most residents were in favor of the roundabout. A suggestion was made to consider pedestrian enhancements to improve crossing even though not recommending roundabouts, e.g. dynamic speed monitor, crosswalks, enforcements, etc. Motion was made by member Iver and seconded by member Bass to modify previous motion to say leave intersection as is and consider pedestrian enhancements to improve crossing. Motion was made by member Iver and seconded by member Bass to have limited parking, bike lanes, and no change to the intersection. Discussion ensued regarding a motion made earlier by member Thompson and this motion which are in conflict. Member lyer withdrew his motion. TLC Bike Boulevard Update Mr. Houle said Katie Bruwelheide, traffic engineer with Alliant Engineering would give an update on the TLC Bike Boulevard. He asked that the ETC provide feedback before an informational meeting is scheduled with residents. He said the plan will be to come back to the ETC after the informational meeting with residents and then on to the Council for a public hearing. Ms. Bruwelheide said the route starts at 54th & Zenith west on 54th to Wooddale Avenue, south of Wooddale to Vallev View Road, under TH -62 and down to 70th into an existing bike path. She said construction is tentatively scheduled begin August with completion by fall. She said they are requesting design exceptions on a couple segments. She said the 4 project has eight segments that are divided into two phases with phase two being the most difficult. Phase I is 54th to north of TH -62 and Phase II from north of TH -62 to W. 701h. Funding is not yet available for Phase II. The eight segments are: Phase I 1. 54th Ave — Xerxes to France Avenue Option: Bike Boulevard 2. (A) 54th — France to Minnehaha Creek Option 1: Shared Lanes Option 2: Advisory Lanes Option 3: Shared Lane and Bike Lane (B) 54th — Brookview Ave to Wooddale Avenue Option 1: Shared Lanes Option 2: Bike Lanes 3. Wooddale Ave — 54th to Valley View Road Option 1: Bike Lanes Option 2: Advisory'Lanes 4. Valley View Road — Woodddale to Brookview Avenue Option: Colored Shared Lanes Phase II 5. Valley View: Road — 'Brookview Ave to 64th Street Option: Bike Lanes 6. Valley View Road — 64th to 65th Street Option: Colored Shared Lanes 7. Valley View Road — 651h to 66th Street Option: Dedicated Bike Lanes 8. Valley View Road — 66th to 691h Street Option: Dedicated Bike Lanes Discussion This route, the first,phase of the Comprehensive Bike Plan, was chosen and narrowed down from an original route and it aligns with Minneapolis' bike lanes. Motion was made by member Thompson and seconded by member NelsonJor the consultant to present options to the public that is most likely to be approved by State Aid. All voted ave. Motion carried. Living Streets Workshop Recap Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Nelson to table Living Streets Workshop Recap until next meeting. All voted ave. Motion carried. 5 . Living Streets Consultant Selection After brief discussion, the consensus was to go with BARR Engineering, the only firm that submitted a proposal. Edina Transportation Commission Bylaws Chair Janovy said the bylaws should be adopted as written; however, she received permission to change the quorum from 5 to a simple majority of seated voting members, and also a section that seemed confusing was "If a quorum is not achieved within 15 minutes...." She said if they agree they can vote to make these changes at the next meeting. Updates Student Member - No updates. Bike Edina Task Force — Minutes of January 12. 2012 - No updates. Grandview Small Area Study Member Nelson said the public comment period is still going on and the framework is online at www.edinacitizenenp,ap,ement.org. He said two public meetings were held and approximately 25 -30 people attended. Council will receive the recommendation on April 17. Living Streets Working Group Member Thompson said they need discuss how to move forward. Chair Janovy said they could consider creating a committee of the whole. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Nelson said France Avenue was recently restriped to single lane and he has seen cars using the shoulder as 2 driving lane. His suggestion of marking the shoulder to show that it is not a driving lane will be forwarded to Hennepin County by Mr. Houle. Member Bass talked briefly about a campaign that the City of Rochester (See Safe Smart) is doing and a possible funding opportunity through the Met Council for France Avenue. She will talk more these at the next meeting. She also asked about Engineering Department staffing which Mr. Houle addressed below. STAFF COMMENTS Update on France Avenue Pedestrian Bridge Re- scoping Mr. Houle said City Manager Neal and WSB & Associates consultant Chuck Rickart made the presentation to the Funding and Programming Committee of the TAC, which is advisory to the Met Council's Transportation Advisory Board (TAB). He said some of the TAC's concerns were not addressing bike facility and at crossing video detection. He said some on the the committee felt the bridge was safer than grade separation. He said the vote was 8 ayes and 10 nays. He said they will be appealing to the TAB and Mr. Rickart to checking to see they can appeal to the TAC. Mr. Houle said it is promising because the TAB recently overturned a sunset date for another project. Staffing in the Engineering Department— Mr. Houle said the entire City has gone through reorganization. He said he was the public works director /city engineer and as of recent he is no longer the public works director. He said they are currently advertising to fill the assistant city engineer position but this person will not be the liaison to the ETC. Mr. Houle will continue as the liaison until a transportation engineer is hired. Additionally, the utility engineer position will be vacant soon and this position will be changed to an environmental engineer (if approved by Council) and serve as the liaison to the EEC. Mr. Houle asked the commission if they would be interested in an orientation on functionality of the City. He said assistant city manager Kurt has put together a PowerPoint presentation that they might find useful. They all agreed that this would be helpful. It will be scheduled one hour before the next scheduled meeting in March. Regarding the agenda, Mr. Houle said it is set up similar to the Council agenda showing upcoming meeting dates and events. He said members can add meeting dates also. ADJOURNMENT Meeting _adjourned at 10:10 p.m. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet 7 Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type 1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type 1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. `A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION NAME TERM_ J I FIMIAIMIJIJIAISIOI N I D I Work Session I Work Session # of Mtgs. I Att _ endance . .. ............._ ...... in s/Wo rk Sessions Meet 9 1 1 1 1 4 (enter d r date) ... Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 4 100% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 3 75% Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2013 1 1 1 3 75% lyer, Surya 2/1/2015 :; 1 1 1 3 100% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 4 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 << 1 1 1 3 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 4 100% Schweiger, Steven student 1 1 1 3 75% Thompson, Michael 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 4 100% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 3 100% VACANT student 0 0% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type 1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type 1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. `A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: I MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM March 15,2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Schweiger, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The meeting agenda was changed as follows:. Item A, 'State Complete Streets meeting update' was deleted, and item G, '1494 Auxiliary Lane Municipal Consent' took its place. . Motion was made by member LaForce and - seconded by member Thompson approving the revised meeting agenda. All _voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16, 2012 Approval was carried over until the next meeting. COMMUNITY COMMENT— None. REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS 1494 Auxiliary Lane Municipal Consent Mr. Scott Pedersen from MnDOT, gave the same presentation that was presented previously to the ETC at the January 19, 2012 meeting, plus some new information that are in italics. Mr. Pedersen said MnDOT is doing three different projects over three phases and they are: 1 -494 from TH -100 to 24th Avenue; construct auxiliary lanes on westbound 1 -494; and reconstruction of the Xerxes Avenue Bridge. The project letting will be June 8, 2012, and construction will begin August, 2012, and end Fall, 2013. The three phases are: Phase I (Bid Letting June 8, 2012, Construction Start Date August 12 to late Fall, 2012;) Construct auxiliary lanes on westbound 1 -494 between Portland Avenue and Nicollet Avenue; and 1 -35 and TH -100. Reconstruct the outside shoulders on both eastbound and westbound of 1 -494. Reconstruct the inside shoulders from 24th Avenue to TH -77, and resurface 1 -494 from 24th Avenue to TH -77. Traffic controls will include maintaining. 3. drive lanes in daytime peak hours and closing the following ramps: Nicollet, Portland, 12th; and probably France. Traffic.will be pushed to the inside while they work on the outside shoulders. Phase II (Spring to Summer, 2013) Reconstruction of the inside shoulders of 1 -494 from TH -77 to TH -100. Remove guardrail and curb and gutter and replace with concrete barrier. Reconstruct drainage system in median to facilitate modification to the median. Traffic controls will include pushing traffic to the outside lanes while they work in the middle and it is not known at this time if ramp closures will be necessary. Phase III (Summer to Fall, 2013) . Resurface 1 -494 between TH -100 and TH -77. This work will be done in sections over four weekends with complete closure of each section and detouring of traffic. 1 Xerxes Avenue Bridge construction will be Fall, 2012, to late Spring, 2013. The bridge will be closed and taken out this August and reopen Spring, 2013 (it is being raised for more vertical clearance on the corridor). The following intersections will remain open for as long as it is feasible: Edinborough Way, 78`h Street, and Southtown Blvd. Mr. Pedersen said issues identified during the City of Edina's open house were proposed typical section under the Xerxes Avenue Bridge; 1 -494 as a managed facility; and access to Xerxes Avenue from 1 -494. Mr. Pedersen said they are usually asked why there is so much space under the Penn and Nicollet Bridges and he said it is 26 ft. that is reserved for future expansion of 1 -494 for six lanes in each direction. He said Xerxes will not have 26 ft. reserved and it is a risk that MnDOT is willing to accept because the current 20 year plan does not include expansion. MnDOT's 20 year plan and the Met Council's Transportation Policy Plan show 1 -494 as a Tier 11 Managed Corridor similar to 1 -35W. He said discussion has included the auxiliary lane being a toll lane that would be open in peak hours but in the meantime they would like to add it as a general purpose lane and change to toll in in the future. And this is what MnDOT is hoping cities will agree to in a resolution. After discussion, he said the lane under Xerxes does not fit the true definition of an auxiliary lane and probably should not be called an auxiliary lane. ADA provisions for Xerxes Avenue & Edinborough Way was redesigned based on feedback from the City using a single axle truck as the design vehicle. This resulted in extension of the island as a refuge, narrower road and shorter pedestrian crossing. City engineer Houle said the public hearing is scheduled for April 3 and that Mr. Pederson will be giving the some presentation to the Council. Mr. Houle said he is looking for a recommendation from the ETC to Council. Motion was made by member Nelson to accept the recommendation as written and forward to Council and th, motion was seconded by member LaForce. All voted ave. Motion carried. Chair Janovy said she is not comfortable using the word "believes" in the resolution. After discussion the word "believes" was changed to "acknowledge." Member Nelson accepted the amendment to his motion to include deleting "believes" that appears twice in the resolution and replacing them with "acknowledge." Motion was made by member Franzen to approve the amended motion and it was seconded by member Iver. All voted ave. Motion carried. Grandview Small Area Study — Kevin Staunton Mr. Staunton said he is the vice -chair of the Planning Commission and chair of the Steering Committee for the Grandview Small Area Planning Process. He thanked member Nelson and past member Bonneville for their support on the Steering Committee. He said they started the 2 "d phase in April 2010 and had three community workshops in fall; worked with a consulting team; and the steering committee approved the development framework in January. He said they are in the public comment period and is hoping to incorporate suggestions from the public at their March 29 meeting, before going to Planning Commission on April 11, and City Council April 17 for support. He said they are calling the plan a "Development Framework" to communicate the notion that it is a vision for implementation over the next 20 years but realistically, as it unfolds, some things may not be done as it is currently shown in the framework. He said while they did work with Jack Broz, a traffic consultant with HR Green, they have not done any traffic studies. He said this is where the ETC would get involved. The plan is on the City's website as well as at edinacitizenengagement.org. A Mr. Staunton said they developed seven Guiding Principles and the areas that relates to transportation are: A "connected" district; regional connections; more walkable; community and convenience parking; improve movement within and access to the district; facilitate multiple modes of transportation; and preserve future transit opportunities. .Mr. Staunton gave an overview of the framework as follows: Vernon Avenue .He'said discussion included 'right sizing' Vernon (which is old Hwy 169,and still acts this way today). Currently, the speed goes from 40 mph to 30 mph and it turns into a 4 -lane road. He said this is opposite of how it should function. He said they've discussed staying within the same right -of -way and redesigning the road to 2 ,lanes, with a turn lane, median, sidewalk and bike lanes. He said this is on a phasing schedule of 5 -10 years because it is a County road and they've also discussed the option of the County turning it back to the City. Library Area Opening 53`d, 52 "d, and 51" Streets to Vernon to facilitate crossings from .Bedford /Oxford /Hankerson and designing in such a way so that drivers will know to slow down. He said there is a lot of cut thru traffic from Gleason to Hwy. 100 and this could probably discourage the cut thru. He said the only push back was from residents in the Richmond Hills neighborhood because Sherwood; is their only access and they've talked about an alternative design with 53`d as .a new connection to Sherwood. This. area would also have a pedestrian path from Grandview Square to Jerry's. Intersection controls are still to be determined. This area would be done in the 2nd phase. Vernon Interlachen Blvd, Gus Young Lane This area could have two pedestrian bridges - one over the railroad tracks called Grandview Crossings and another over TH100 to City Hall. The recommendation is to build a community center at the old public works site with structured parking with accommodation for future transit. TH100 TH100 is currently ,a split diamond built to accommodate traffic from old Hwy. 169 and the plan is to eliminate the dangerous design on the west side by redesigning a frontage road with an intersection, and an intersection also on the east side, by Tupa Park. This would remove all aspects of old Hwy 169. He said the idea is to create a design that would separate drivers going to and from TH100, from drivers whose destination is within the district and this might mean turning some streets such as Gus Young Lane into a one -way street. Grandview Square to Jerry's and school bus garage site The school district would like to move the bus garage but it has not been cost effective. This area could potentially be privately developed and go from no taxes to a tax based mixed used development. Park and Ride The framework shows Metro Transit's 587 express route and stops and also identifies three options for park and ride. There is a need for park and ride and the Met Council is eager to find a space in the area for 200 or less cars. Bicycle Plan Mr. Staunton thought a cool idea would be to have a bike path next to the railroad so that you go under Vernon to Brookview and to the Greenway. He showed an aerial map from 1953 and their 2023 dream design and how different it could be. He said he is unclear what the process will be after April 17 when the Council is scheduled to publicly review the framework. Chair Janovy commented on the inclusion of Complete Streets and Living Streets into the framework design and the focus on biking, walking and transit. She asked if there was something specific that the Council wanted them to review. Mr. Staunton said on February 28, they met in a work session with the Council and the Council asked if the ETC had seen 3 the transportation plan. He said they were reminded that ETC members Nelson and Bonneville were part of the steering committee but they are getting to the point where they will have to figure out how to navigate and identify who will be doing what. He said there is probably nothing for the ETC to do at this time. Regarding the implementation steering committee, he said he is not sure how the Council is going to handle this. He said it is possible that they may give transportation to the ETC, landuse to the Planning Commission, etc. He said the Council has asked for a recommendation for height and density of proposed buildings which is something the steering committee has not been able to agree on. Safe Routes to School Resolution — Katherine Bass Member Bass said there is proposed legislation in the 2012 bonding bill for $3M for Safe Routes to School projects to be administered through MnDOT. She said a coalition, led by the American Heart Association, is looking for cities and organizations to support a resolution for approval of the funds. She said there is a demand for infrastructure to allow more students to walk to school but there isn't enough funding. She asked if it is something that they should recommend to the Council for support. She said there is a report that shows that communities that have a plan in place are more successful in getting funding and chair Janovy said Bloomington Public Health has $30,000 set aside for Edina to develop a plan. Member Bass motioned to forward the resolution to the Council with a recommendation to pass resolution in support of inclusion of the funding in the bonding bill and the motion was seconded by member Whited. Chair Janovy said Safe Routes is one of top 3 priorities for the ETC for 2012. Member chair Janovy motioned to forward an advisory communication, along with the fact sheet to Council and the motion was seconded by member LaForce. Member Bass will write the recommendation and members Iver and Thompson to review. All voted ave. Motion carried. Speed Limit Policy Chair Janovy said the Council has reduced the speed limit on W. 58th and W. 70th and wants to do the same on Tracy. She said the current policy does not allow this and has put together information on speed limits and asked for feedback for a recommendation to Council to update the speed limit policy. Member Whited asked if there is any evidence that reducing the speed limit works because she is on a street where it has been reduced and there does not seem to be any difference. Chair Janovy said no, that additional reinforcements are needed, but Council still wants to do it. Member Franzen motioned that they recommend updating the speed limit policy to the Council and the motion was seconded by member Bass. All voted ave. Motion carried. Member Janovy motioned to write the recommendation and member LaForce to review and the motion was seconded by member Thompson. All voted ave. Motion carried. Living Streets Workshop Recap Chair Janovy said there is a video of the workshop online. Member Bass said it was a great start to the conversation and that it was well represented by the school district, city, and various city commissioners. City engineer Houle said BARR's lead person for the RFP has moved on and they do not have a replacement for him. He said HR Green has someone on staff and Mr. Houle recommended that they hire HR Green to work with BARR. Everyor agreed. 4 I Edina Transportation Commission Bylaws Chair Janovy said the bylaws were revised since last meeting. Member Iyer motioned to approve the bylaws and the motion was seconded by member Franzen. All voted ave. Motion carried. For clarification, chair Janovy said for a cancelled meeting to count towards attendance, the meeting has to be cancelled ahead of time. She also said they can miss three meetings (provided 12 regular meetings have been scheduled); however, not in a row. Updates Student Member Member Schweiger said he liked the Grandview plan and that it will be easier for him to get there on his bike. Bike Edina Task Force — Minutes of February 9, 2012 - No updates. Grandview Small Area Study Member Nelson said the public comment period is still open. TLC Bike Boulevard Update City engineer Houle said they are waiting for a response from MnDOT on the use of advisory lanes like City of Minneapolis has. The public meeting has not been scheduled yet. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS STAFF COMMENTS Update on France Avenue Pedestrian Bridge Re- scoping City engineer Houle said the Funding and Programming Committee of the TAC did not approve their re- scoping plan and that they will be meeting with the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) on March 21. City Manager Neal will give the presentation. Gallagher Drive & Three Rivers Trail City engineer•,Houle said staff is working with Three Rivers District and SEH as the City's consultant, to put a trail on Gallagher Drive. He said the recommendation is to reduce the curb line, improve the intersection for at -grade crossing and add a trail on both sides of the road. The project limits is Parklawnto France. An informational meeting is scheduled for March 27, 576:30 p.m., at Centennial Lakes in the Hughes Pavilion. Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Project Update City engineer Houle said the plan was approved as recommended by the ETC. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:27p.m. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet 5 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. I Attendance /° M e e tin s/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 4 Bass, Katherine 2/1/20141 1 1 1 1 1 1 Joint Work Session 1 1 Rescheduled Meeting' 1 1 1 Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. 1 Special Meeting 4 1 100% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 3 75% Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2013 1 1 1 3 75% lyer, Surya 2/1/2015 ;;; 1 1 1 3 100% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 4 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 3 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 4 100% Schweiger, Steven student 1 1 1 3 75% Thompson, Michael 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 4 100% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 <'i 1 1 1 3 100% VACANT student 0 0% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w /Quorum Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type ''1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type 1 " under the month on the meetings' line. Type 1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. 'A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION MARCH 27, 2012 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Chair Kingston, and Student Members Aderhold and Nolan. Staff present: Lisa Schaefer, Human Resources Director and Staff Liaison; and Susan Howl and Candy Fiedler, administrative staff. Guests present: Dana Lappin, Phil Johnson and Val Burke III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED. Motion was made by Commissioner, Stanton and seconded by Commissioner Cashmore approving the meeting agenda of March 27, 2012. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Seidman and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee approving the consent agenda as follows: W.A. Approve the meeting minutes of February 28, 2012. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no community comments. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. ART CENTERBOARD PRESENTATION Dana Lappin, Art Center Board Member, and Phil Johnson, Media Studio Manager, were introduced and welcomed. They handed out informational packets about the Art Center and explained that they were on a speaking tour to encourage board'and commission members to join the Art,Center. Ms. Lappin recognized Student Member Nolan for winning 2 "d Place at the Art Show. Photos of her winning art will be distributed to HRRC members. Commissioner Cashmore suggested changing the wording on the membership materials from "Spouse and Children's" names to "Household" names in order to be more welcoming and inclusive of all families. Chair Kingston and Ms. Lappin agreed to discuss how to modify this in light of the passage of the Domestic Partnership Ordinance. Mr. Johnson explained that one of the most popular features at the Art Center was the Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studio where people can transfer older forms of media to digitalized media such as CD's and DVD's. An appointment is necessary to use the facility. VI.B. DEMOGRAPHICS AND CENSUS DATA INFORMATION FROM EDINA RESOURCE CENTER Commissioner Stanton reported that one of the Commission's initiatives is to identify ways to reach out to new and emerging communities in Edina where assimilation may be an issue and help these residents feel welcome. The Commission introduced and welcomed Val Burke, the Director of Community Education Services for the School District, who was invited to share demographics and census data information. She shared the District's demographics and open enrollment figures, encouraging the Commission to look at areas where differences exist and visualize how to connect people to services. Ms. Burke reported that there are approximately 1400 students coming to Edina through open enrollment, which mirrors the population lost to private schools. There are 140 students from the "Choice Is Yours," which is a program giving low- income Minneapolis families opportunities to attend suburban schools. It was noted that 95% of the teachers in the Edina Schools are Caucasian, and the School District is striving to bring change by recruiting minorities. Ms. Burke noted that that the southeast corner of Edina has the largest immigrant population and that Cornelia Elementary School represents the greatest minority population among all the other schools.. Edina's Asian, Somali and East Indian populations settle primarily in the southeast corner. The School District is trying to be proactive in more equally balancing the number of students of color to all of the elementary schools to comply with Federal enrollment regulations. Student Member Aderhold reported a misconception at the high school that people of color are bussed from Minneapolis. Student Member Nolan shared that the high school will be holding a multi - cultural event, and Ms. Burke said she would forward this information to the Commission. Commissioner Finsness indicated that the Commission should be proactive regarding the changing demographics and wondered where it could focus its attention. Ms. Burke reported that collaboration with the Southdale YMCA and Bloomington Public Health is helping to bridge the gap between a healthy /productive life and unmet needs. She gave an example of Edinborough Park or Centennial Lakes venturing into partnerships to provide on -site adult learning centers. Commissioner Finsness shared that a City -wide event could be planned that would appeal to new residents and bring people together. She remarked that the Commission would benefit from connecting with the City's ethnic leaders and that we could focus on planning activities with them. Ms. Burke suggested a number of possibilities for bringing residents together: ➢ Blue Cross Blue Shield's do.Town ➢ "Meet on the Sidewalk" event, held at 44`h & France ➢ The Farmer's Market at Centennial Lakes ➢ Open days at the Aquatic Center Ms. Burke shared that there is active minority representation within the advisory councils at Cornelia School and at the Parklawn Apartments, and she suggested that the Commission set up meetings with families at these locations. Commissioner Cashmore noted that people are reaching out on parallel paths and that one "bridge committee" is needed to harness resources to ensure we are actually heading in the same direction. He shared that there could be a concerted effort and collaboration among HRRC, the Park Department and the School District. Ms. Burke suggested a common meeting with Eden Prairie, Hopkins, and other neighboring communities to learn how they have addressed the changing demographics. VI.C. NEW BOARD MEMBER ORIENTATION Staff Liaison Lisa Schaefer presented a member orientation PowerPoint explaining the role of Edina's boards and commissions. Included in the presentation were: the mission statement, responsibilities of the Chair and Staff Liaison, what constitutes a quorum and voting, attendance, packets, agendas, the Open Meeting Law and reminders about respectful behavior. A handout of the presentation, a summary,of Parliamentary Procedures and Edina's Code of Ethics were distributed. Commissioner Finsness questioned the appropriateness of a quote by Pope John Paul II and, a photo of Al Franken with the Energy and Environment.Commission being used in the presentation. VI.D. _ RESCHEDULE REGULAR'MEETINGS It is necessary to reschecldle.two .upcoming Commission meetings in order to respect religious observances and comply with the Public Meetings and Religious Observances Policy. The September 215E meeting interferes with Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kipper, and the December meeting falls on Christmas Day. Motion was made by Commissioner Cashmore and seconded by Commissioner Stanton to change the regularly- scheduled meeting of September 215` to September 27`h to respect the observance of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kipper. Member Cashmore withdrew his motion upon learning that September 27`h was within the days of observance. Motion was made by Commissioner Stanton and seconded by Commissioner Finsness to change the September 25`h meeting to September 20`h Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. Motion was made by Commissioner Finsness and seconded by Commissioner Stanton to cancel the regularly - scheduled meeting in December. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. Staff Member Howl was requested to e-mail these changes to all HRRC members. VI.E. TOM OYE AWARD: RECIPIENT Joyce Repya was elected to be the recipient of the Tom Oye Award for her volunteerism in the schools' classrooms sharing the history of racial exclusion in Edina and for working on Edina's website to bridge the gap between misinformation /lack of information and enlightenment. Commissioner Winnick will present the award to Ms. Repya at the Volunteer Recognition Reception on April 23`d. Staff Member Howl was asked to notify Ms. Repya. Vice Chair Seidman questioned the procedure for notifying the remaining nominees. Chair Kingston recommended talking with Commissioner Winnick and, at the request of Commissioner Finsness, scheduling a Tom Oye Award debrief at the, April or May meeting. VI.F. WORK PLAN VI.F.1. Procurement Policy Commissioner Cashmore presented a handout of the thought process regarding Conflict Free Products and asked for feedback from the Commissioners through the Staff Liaison in order to prepare for an action item at the April meeting. VI.F.2. Monitor Domestic Partner Ordinance Commissioner Cashmore requested that this be continued to a future meeting. VI.F.3. Initiate Census Research Funding Recommendation Commissioner Stanton requested that this be continued to a future meeting. Chair Kingston requested that Commissioner Stanton take all the information we have reviewed over the past few months and present some recommendations on steps HRRC can take as it relates to the information learned on the Census data. VI.F.4. Update Bias /Hate Crimes Response Plan Commissioner Winnick was not present to provide an update. VI.F.S. Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals A flyer was distributed regarding the Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals Midwest Tour. Chair Kingston shared that there was going to be a private opening of the exhibit on April 10th and that HRRC Members could attend. She offered to send out an e-mail invitation for RSVP's. Communications and Technology Director Bennerotte will be contacted to publicize the exhibit and the films. VI.F.6. Anti - bullying Event and Education Commissioner Finsness suggested that the City's website and reader board publicize the film "BULLY" which will be opening in Minneapolis on April 13`h at the Landmark Lagoon. She will share additional information at the April Commission meeting. Motion was made by Commissioner Newell and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee to request that the City's Communication Department publicize the film "BULLY" and that Commissioner Finsness share pertinent curriculum with the Edina schools. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. VI.F.7. Marriage Amendment Forum Chair Kingston reported that there is a press release being developed and that OutFront MN has been notified. Student Member Aderhold shared that a number of students' May -Term reports will be about the amendment. VI.F.B. Diversity Awareness Event Commissioner Cashmore requested that this item be continued to the April meeting. VI.F.9. Days of Remembrance A proclamation was handed out to members for review, and it was noted that it has been one year since the Days of Remembrance event. Student Member Nolan reported that the proclamation and supporting data will be shared at the high school and that the information will be considered historical and not religious. Commissioner Cashmore will provide Student Member Nolan with the materials from 0 last year. Staff member Howl added that she has booklets from the event that can also be used, and Commissioner Bigbee indicated that his wife has numerous photos. Vice Chair Seidman indicated that the proclamation should be corrected to include all groups that were persecuted. Motion was made by Commissioner Seidman and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee to modify the first "Whereas" of the proclamation to include all persecuted groups and that the subcommittee will send the copy to Staff Member Howl to update prior to the April 3'd Council meeting. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Kingston, Newell, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. . V,I.F.10. Somali Relief Efforts Commissioner Newell reported that she is trying to locate the person leading the efforts in Edina to. facilitate and provide reliefto relatives of the Somali population in their homeland. She indicated that HRRC would stand in supporting this-currently-active group. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS No correspondence or petitions were received. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Finsness suggested that the meetings be concluded by 9:10 PM. Chair Kingston noted that due to lengthy discussions and questions, the timing was difficult to control. IX. STAFF COMMENTS There were no comments. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Kingston declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 PM. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC, April 24, 2012 Candy Fiedler, Administrative Staff Jessi Kingston, HRRC Chair I MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL '10, 2012 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm IL ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Members Dan Peterson, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson, Jones; Weicht, Neville III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Dan. Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson, Jones Motion Carried IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes —Regular Meeting of Tuesday, March 13, 2012 Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson, Jones Motion Carried V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VIA. Hornet's Nest Working Group Recommendation Member Jones thanked the Hornet's Nest Working Group, who all diligently met on Tuesday mornings at 7:30 a.m. to work through the details of this proposal. She explained to the Park Board that as part of the process the.group looked not only at the proposal presented to them at their special meeting on January 23rd. but they also reviewed the broader needs of Braemar Arena, such as what capital investment would. be needed at Braemar to function and to stay competitive and to. attract the purchase of off - season ice time and remain a premiere facility. She noted thatthe group, realized-that the key to do those things was,to offer an indoor training.facility at the arena. She stated that with great thanks to staff and Mr. Anderson they were to get a.construction cost range from four contractors as well as letters of interest from several indoor training operators'and a retail store. She pointed out that.after reviewing the information the Working Group agreed to the scope, scale, location and amenities of the project. She added that for anyone who asks'she would gladly provide the meeting minutes and, recommendations from. their meetings. She no they carry a lot of information on how they made their decision and as a group how they unanimously endorsed the proposal presented in the Park Board packet. Mr. Anderson first thanked the members of the Working Group for the time and effort they put into the project. He explained that a little over two years ago a small group of Edina Alumni conceived the Hornet's Nest Project and their goal was simple: to bring Braemar Arena back to the forefront as one of the best facilities in the State ,of Minnesota. He noted that when Braemar Arena was constructed in 1966 it was a "state of the art" facility. Today the three sheets of ice remain among the very best in the state; however, over the last 46 years the needs and the demands of both hockey players and figure skaters have evolved. He indicated that many players drive to communities like Woodbury, Wayzata, Eden Prairie and St. Paul to train for their shooting skills, puck handling skills, weight training, etc. He stated that the Hornet's Nest Project will allow boys and girls, hockey players and figure skaters, mites to high school age to receive training both on and off the ice all under one roof. Mr. Anderson explained that the project- as contemplated would be constructed on the north side of the Braemar West arena and would be a two story 26,000 square foot addition that could be accessed either directly from Braemar Arena or from the parking area to the west of Braemar Arena. He pointed out that the lower level would consist of four locker rooms which would house both the men's and women's varsity and junior varsity programs. He added that the design of the facility was engineered to reduce the overall size by approximately 8,000 square feet from the previous presentation. He noted at the request of the Braemar Arena staff a Zamboni room has been added along the side of the central egress corridor adjacent to Braemar West arena. Mr. Anderson showed renderings of what the locker rooms might look like as well as the training facility and retail store. Mr. Anderson then went through the summary of the project. He noted that they solicited estimates from four different contractors including Kraus Anderson, Copeland Construction, Knudson Construction and RJM Construction. He noted that the average cost of the estimates from these contractors was $121.00 sq. ft. and so at 26,450 square feet the total cost of the project would be approximately 3.2 million dollars. He pointed out that the estimated cost of 3.2 million less the cost of the Zamboni room, $200,000, would leave a net cost of approximately 3 million dollars. Mr. Anderson explained that through the 501C3 group "Drive for the Hive ", they will solicit 25% of the project costs through private donations and therefore as a result the finance request is for just under 2.5 million dollars. He pointed out that the amortization table shows the debt fully amortizing over a 20 year period. Mr. Anderson explained to the Park Board that regarding rent they solicited requests for expression of interest ( "RFEI ") from several third party operators including FIT, Ice Edge, Total Hockey and Velocity. The response to the RFEI's indicated the tenant's willingness to enter into a long -term lease agreement as depicted in the rent role. He noted that they did the same for retail and solicited RFEI's from several retailers including General Sports, Sports World, and Letterman Sports. Mr. Anderson indicated that the total revenue derived from the project is estimated at a little over $223,000. In the cash flow projection that revenue will be used to pay both the operating expense and to retire the debt as shown in the lower right hand corner of the "Hornet's Nest Summary" sheet. He pointed out that while this does show a slight negative cash flow in the early years Ms. Miller will be explaining how the presence of the training facility will mitigate that through increased revenues at Braemar. Member Cella stated that in the cash flow projection it shows rental revenue but also reimbursement revenue and asked Mr. Anderson to explain what the reimbursement revenue is. Mr. Anderson replied that the leases that will be executed by the third party operators of the training facility and the retail are what are known as triple net leases. This means that the retailer and the training facility operator would be responsible for their pro rata share of the operating expenses and any taxes that would be associated with that space and those reimbursements just depict that fact. Mr. Keprios indicated that as he pointed out in his staff report if this were to go forward staff is of the opinion, and he believes they have the Working Group's endorsement of this, that there are some additional improvements that would be triggered as highly needed if the Hornet's Nest were to go through. He noted that as shown in the Report and Recommendation the relocation of the West Arena Zamboni room would be very important because it has always been a safety hazard and they have been fortunate there have not been any accidents. He stated that area would then be made into a much needed larger lobby area for the lower level of the West Arena. It is estimated to cost approximately $42,000. 2 Mr. Keprios explained that if they were to move forward and relocate the Zamboni room and build a Hornet's.Nest it would be extremely important for them to have a safe, accessible path for coaches and staff to then access to the player's benches from that lower level without having to walk across the ice on the one end. He noted it would cost approximately $161,000. Mr. Keprios pointed out that if they do this they will lose some seating and to make up for some of that lost seating he showed where they could create an open railing which would create more seating. He noted they've estimated it would cost approximately $23;000 to create that standing room only seating. Therefore; relocating of the Zamboni room, renovation of the vacated Zamboni >rooin to create a larger'lobby to add the ADA. accessible pathway access and to include that upper lobby railing would cost approximately $429,000. Mr. Keprios stated that isn't to say that Braemar Arena doesn't have more needs beyond that but if the Hornet's Nest were to be built it would trigger those as probably being the highest in priority. Mr. Keprios stated that staff is recommending Park Board move forward with this project in concept to the City Council with some contingencies; however, not everything is in concrete at this point. He noted _ that'it would be contingent;upon 25% of the prcject.($752;367:67) be covered through private donations. The recommendation" would also be contingent upon getting a commitment from the EHA and Edina Figure Skating Club to commit to a $20:00 surcharge on a per player basis per year for the life of the bonds and this would be consistent with what was done when they first built the West Arena. The last contingency would be that the City Council and School Board would have to agree on an ice rental surcharge fee needed to cover the operating expenses. He indicated that is not something that staff could just literally impose so don't consider that a given; however, the working group put approximately $12,000 in their recommendation. Mr. Keprios commented that lastly he thinks it would be fair to propose to the City Council that before they were to embark on something like this they would want ten- ` year lease agreements from the two vendors that would be leasing the space on the upper level. Member Dan Peterson asked as part of the $161,000 for the ADA entrance being proposed is there an ADA approved restroom on the level or is it required under law to be wheelchair accessible. Mr. Keprios responded that it is not an ADA or City Code issue; however, it is a safety factor more than anything. Mr. Keprios stated that even though it is not required, in our view, it would be the right thing to do. Member Segreto commented the one issue she has is the recommendation does talk about an in perpetuity suggestion that the High School contribute or pay $12,000 per year and she thinks they have to be really careful about any kind of payment scheme that locks an in perpetuity and would like that to be made part of the record. Member Kathryn Peterson asked for. clarification between" the difference of the Hornet's Nest summary around the Zamboni room and "what was in- ,Mr..Keprios presentation around Zamboni room, are there two different Zamboni rooms. Mr. Keprios replied no, Mr. Anderson was. showing where the Zamboni room would be located and pointed but that the new'Zamboni room would be the city's part. Member Kathryn Peterson asked'so the costs That are shown for construction would not be duplicated? Mr. Keprios apologized for the confusion'.beeause as he read through it ,a little closer the Zamboni room costs of $202,821.50 need to be added back into the net construction costs if we are to include relocating the Zamboni room to become part of this project. Member Cella commented if she could just clarify when Member Segreto was talking about an in perpetuity of payment by the High School she believes what Mr. Keprios was clarifying as part of his remarks that.items listed as proposals for fees are just suggestions. This is something that would still need to be worked out with the School Board and City Council to sit down and come to an agreement. Chair Steel asked if there has been any communications with the Figure Skating Club to which Mr. Anderson replied yes. He pointed out that the difficulty the Figure Skating Club has right now is that they don't have a training facility and they are losing figure skaters to a facility in St. Paul that does have a specific training facility. He added that he did talk to the Director of the Figure Skating Club and they are in support of this and would like to see a training facility. Member Kathryn Peterson asked if the liability around the use of the training facility be the responsibility of the vendor or would it fall back on the city because it is a city facility. Mr. Anderson replied that third party operator would be leasing the space and they would have to provide their own insurance so that any injuries that would occur in there would be their insurance and not the city's. Mr. Keprios commented that most likely they would ask them to add the city as an additional insured on the lease. Chair Steel asked Mr. Keprios that the recommendation before the Park Board is the Working Group's recommendation as well as the these four additional projects with contingencies, correct. Mr. Keprios replied that is correct. Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, approving the recommendation Chair Steel stated. Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson, Jones Motion Carried VI.B. Veteran's Memorial Committee New Member Appointment Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that there is currently a vacancy on the Veteran's Memorial Committee due to Member Barb Bender not being able to continue to volunteer due to her new job. She has only been able to attend 2 of the last 13 meetings. He stated that there is a very eager and willing volunteer, Richard Olson, who would be more than happy to fill in as a voting member. He indicated that he has a lot of experience in the fundraising arena and has been giving the committee some wonderful advice along the way. Therefore, he would ask that the Park Board approve Richard Olson as a new member of the Veteran's Memorial Committee. Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Cella, approving Richard Olson as the new member of the Veteran's Memorial Committee. Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson, Jones Motion Carried VI. C. Veteran's Memorial Sculptor Contract Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they have a verbal commitment from a donor who wants to currently remain anonymous but has verbally pledged $100,000. He asked that the Park Board recommend to the City Council to forward with executing the proposed sculpture artist's contract because it takes 9 to 10 months to develop the sculpture. He added that their target date is to have the memorial in the ground by Memorial Day of 2013. He indicated that the Veteran's Committee feels very confident they are going to get enough money through in -kind and cash donations to move forward with this project. Therefore, he wants to be sure that they have the support of the Park Board and City Council before they go ahead and sign the $83,000 contract; he added that they would not recommend doing this unless they have the money from the donor in the bank. Member Gieseke asked Mr. Keprios if this is a typical scenario and asked for a little bit of background on the sculptor and asked if he has done other work through the City or locally. Mr. Keprios replied that from what they are told from the Edina Public Art Committee the sculptor bases their price on what the foundry tells them what the expenses are going to be and then they tack their fee on top of that. He informed the Park Board that part of the danger of delaying the decision is that the price might go up and that is out of the control of the sculptor. 4 Member Cella asked if the contract and terms is-a pretty standard sort of terms for buying a sculpture. Mr. Keprios replied yes, there are a couple of artists on the Veteran's Committee that say it is standard; however, he also intends to give the.contract to their City , Attorney to be sure they are not missing something. Member Segreto stated that she has represented some artists over the years,and she would like to make three contract comments. First, they have an outside date for the delivery of the art piece; not t6 strap the artist but just a comfortable outside date. Second, it states the venue for disputes is in New York which she thinks should be changed to Minnesota. Third, regarding the copyright in the contract she wants to make sure that they have the right to'make images of the sculpture and use it for promotional purposes because she could see this being on their calendar or something else. Member Segreto commented that she would also;like to _know how members of the community would feel about the artist taking this sculpture and offering4t to another municipality. Mr. Keprios replied that the committee is encouraging the -artist to go- forward.and sell it to one other municipality because it reduces our price tag by $7,000 and the committee is fine with that: Member Jones indicated that she has a couple of reservations regarding this. She noted that the contract commits the City of spending $83;000 for the sculpture to which money has not been budgeted for this expense and if they don't get money from this donor then the $83,000 would have to be taken from other spending priorities in order to meet the contractual obligations to the sculptor. Secondly, $83,000 is just the next step in a project that has a total cost of $400,000 of which none of this has been budgeted by the City. Therefore, if the City takes the first step and is left with an $83,000 sculpture that needs to be installed and they don't have the funding for the rest of the memorial to put it in there will be a strong impetus to find the money in the City budget to complete the memorial where nothing has been set aside for this large expense. Third, she finds the argument that costs may go up so that we must approve the contract today to be spurious because such an argument could be made for each and every possible expense that the City encounters and spending decisions should not be made based upon fear of what might happen to prices in the future. She noted such decisions should be based upon meeting the strategic needs of the City. Member Jones stated that while there is a generous potential donor who will support the cost of the sculpture she still doesn't see that there has been a significant actual contribution to this.project. She pointed out that in the world of charitable organizations where a project of this kind is dependent upon pledged or actual contributions the organization normally refrains froni'making a firm contractual financial commitment to start construction until a significant percentage of the total necessary funding has been pledged. She noted that the percentage usually is over 50% and often over 75 %. Member Jones commented that as she understands it the actual contributions from pledges to date is not very substantial and if the $100,000 potential pledge is made firm then the total contribution would be in the range of 25% of the total cost of the project. Therefore, she doesn't think that is enough for them to move forward with committing-the City to spending money on the project and'fonthat reason she opposes approving the contract at this time. Member Segreto asked Member Jones if she would feel more comfortable if the contract was made contingent upon the committee raising the $83,000 expense that would be this obligation. Member Jones replied that if they could cover the expense and the installation, she doesn't know what installation for a sculpture this size would be, and then she would feel better. Chair Steel pointed that it looks like the cost for delivery and installation would be $7,500; however, that does not include the price of the crane. She indicated that in Mr. Keprios recommendation it says "we have asked that the money be deposited into the Community Foundation account now or at least pledged to be placed in the account in the denominations in time to make the payments" she'stated that she would be more comfortable "asking that the money be deposited into the Community Foundation Account now before they go ahead with this contract ". Member Hulbert stated that he agrees with that. He noted that he thought they were pretty clear when City Council stated and passed that $30,000 was the extent of the City's financial obligation. Therefore, going forward with the installation and the purchase before the actual contribution is made would go against what they have done so far and he would feel more comfortable if they had the deposit. Member Segreto suggested if the contract was made contingent they would have no financial exposure and then they would have the best of both worlds that is having the price of the sculpture locked in and no obligation to pay unless the money was raised and deposited. Member Hulbert noted he would be okay with that. Member Gieseke commented that's a good suggestion and even better seeing as the other party would agree to it. Member Cella responded that would be the issue why the artist would want to agree to go ahead if he thinks prices are going to go up for his foundry costs and if we have a contingency to get out that if she were his lawyer she would tell him not to sign it. Member Segreto commented that if he is making the same sculpture for another municipality he may be fine with it. Member Cella indicated that she does resonate to Member Jones comment about the fact that even looking at the $100,000 donation that is only 25% of the total cost of the $400,000 for the memorial. She stated that to go ahead with buying hard goods for something when you only have 25% of the total raised with one donation, they don't know what the other fundraising efforts are going to be like. She commented that she would feel a little bit more comfortable giving the Veteran's Committee another three or four months to do some serious fundraising so they can come back and say they were able to raise another $100,000 so that they can see that they are actually making some strides to funding the whole project. She added that if this is going to stall out as Member Jones mentioned then they are going to have a big statue with no place to put it. Mr. Keprios commented that he cannot say that it's not going to stall out; however, they did have a meeting today with the owners of a construction company who are interested in an in -kind donation to construct it. Also, the survey work has already been an in -kind donation from a member of the Veteran's Committee. In addition, a committee member is working to secure an in -kind donation of a lot of the granite work through a connection. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they also have two more meetings set up for next week with some significant possible donors as well as they are meeting with the Noon Edina Rotary Club. He noted things are getting set up and they are moving forward; however, he can't sit here and guarantee that they are going to raise all of the money. He commented they will have the money to buy the sculpture, that's a given and the contract will be written that way; however, there is the outside chance that the City will have this beautiful sculpture with nothing to put it on and that would be the risk and worst case scenario to the City. Member Segreto commented that she just got back from Washington, DC, and she came back very inspired after looking at the Veteran Memorials there and her personal opinion is that she doesn't feel that this is such a big risk that she is worried about it and she would like to see this go through. Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to table it for one month and see what the Veteran's Committee can tell them at that time. Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson, Jones Motion Carried VI.D. Cost Recovery Targets for Enterprise Facilities — Keeya Steel, Park Board Chairperson Chair Steel explained to the Park Board that her intent tonight is not to set up cost recovery targets or talk in detail about numbers but rather discuss in general the idea of setting costs recovery targets. She 6 noted that two City Council members expressed to her that they would like targets set; therefore, she would like, to hear from the Park Board what they think as to whether it would be helpful, feasible and would help' make their vision easier. Member Hulbert stated that without having any conversations on the topic he thinks it would be worthwhile to talk about it. He noted that all of the different enterprises are going to have different' challenges so they need to treat them all differently. Member Kathryn Peterson indicated that she thinks it would probably be more helpful in'the`sense of setting ranges instead of the target -being just one number but does think it's worthwhile to talk about. She noted that eventually they would need to get City Council's buy -in to whatever they came back with. Member Segreto commented that she thinks they've struggled with trying to figure this out and she thinks it would be very helpful to have ranges. Member Jacobson stated that she thinks as they try to decide things going forward like the sports dome and how much are they willing to pay for asports dome versus where it is she thinks are the kind of targets that-would help them decide that and how: big a dome they can build as well as anything that they are going forward with in the future to try to be equitable. Member Dan Peterson indicated that he is not opposed to talking about targets but they need to also look at the other side of the column which should be to the benefit of the City. He pointed out that he thinks it would behoove the City to lose money if they ace going to help seniors or kids who can't afford to do some of the things. He noted that another thing that perplexes him is with all levels of government is why they are talking about getting off the property tax idea of funding and look at a State -wide sales tax because the State raises taxes pretty efficiently and just like the schools get money from the State if Edina has 48,000 citizens they would get so much money back to run their City. Member Jones indicated that she would like to raise this to the City Council to make sure that they have their support if they were to take a look at this. She stated that she thinks it would be wise to find out from them if they have their support if they start examining this. She suggested if they did this that it be done much later in the year since their agendas are pretty full for the next few months. Member Jones commented that she also agrees with ranges and would love to find out what makes one place an enterprise facility and not another such at the Art Center and Senior Center, what triggers something to be an enterprise facility. She indicated that she knows just a little bit about the comprehensive plan to say that the enterprise facility has their own targets and their own type of goals; however, she would like for them to look at those goals and see where they match up and .where they don't in meeting those goals. Member Gieseke commented that they are asking'a very-large and important question and he thinks they need to deal with what their mission is and they need to understand more of the scope before they start implementing ranges: He noted "that they don't want to handicap what their decision making mission is supposed to be with set ranges that maybe don't correlate to the overall mission; therefore, they need to know more about how things are functioning and those kinds of categories before they can move forward. Member Kathryn Peterson indicated that actually makes her feel better because when she was talking about the criteria for enterprise facilities she was kind of referencing that she doesn't really understand how the facilities are categorized. Therefore, maybe they need to relook at that as part of this or at least offer their opinion on it. 7 Member Cella stated that depending on what their mission and function is the enterprise facilities may have completely different target ranges than others and may expect some to be more self - sustaining than others. She noted that at some point they may need to have a workshop to lay it all out on the big graphs in excel and kind of see where everything lines up. By doing that they may have a much better sense of what the enterprise is, what its goal really is, what kind of revenue it is bringing in and then what purpose it is serving and what people in our community it is serving and once this is all laid out they can get a sense of that. Member Neville stated that he would like to reemphasize the point that Member Dan Peterson made. It's interesting to him that when they approach an enterprise facility that is losing money they talk about this kind of idea of what it's giving back to the community in that it's okay that it's losing money as long as it's giving something back to the community. He commented that what seems to be the difficulty whenever they approach one of these enterprise facilities is quantifying how much it's okay to be losing for what it is giving back to the community and that is always a really difficult thing to put a number on. He asked how much is it worth that all of these kindergartners have a place to go play because of this enterprise facility. Therefore, as they move forward with these differences they need to make a decision on that difference and can we live with that difference because it's giving back to the community. If we can't live with that difference then we need to make some serious decisions about how the revenue is being created and generated in that enterprise facility or else something needs to change. He commented that it's an interesting idea of how do you quantify that and that is something that obviously needs to have more discussion beyond just this meeting. Chair Steel commented that she would also like to add to those various categories the user fees because even though it is not an enterprise facility there is still a cost recovery target that the City Council has talked about. Chair Steel stated so what she is hearing is that the Park Board wants to look at the value of the public good, cost recovery, targets or ranges and the definition of enterprise. Member Kathryn Peterson stated that as Member Jones pointed out they may want to confirm the understanding with the City Council that that is in fact what they want the Park Board to take on. Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Jones, that the Park Board asks the City Council for their approval that this Park Board studies the value of the public good, the cost recovery targets and the definition of the enterprise facilities knowing that this would be studied at a much ,later date given their work load. Member Segreto asked would it be possible to have the City Council join them in this study, like a joint work group because really the City Council should be involved in the study of the issue. Chair Steel asked Mr. Keprios for his thoughts on that. Mr. Keprios replied at that elected level he thinks it's probably wise that the City Council discuss this as one body in a Joint Work Session with the Park Board. Chair Steel replied that she thinks this recommendation allows for them to decide how they study it. Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Kathryn Peterson, Jones Motion Carried. VI.E. Self - Assessment Survey — Keeya Steel, park Board Chairperson Chair Steel informed the Park Board that she will start to compile the surveys and work with Mr. Keprios and Member Segreto to move to the next step. Member Kathryn Peterson asked what the next step is to which Member Segreto replied getting together to talk about it. Chair Steel replied that she thinks what she will do is compile it and then they can look it over and pick a date and go from there. VI. F. Board and Commission Members Orientation Presentation — Staff 8 Mr. Keprios showed the Park Board a power point presentation created by Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager. The presentation is a generic New Board and Commission Member orientation that from here on will be given to new Board and Commission members. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he is still receiving emails on the Edinborough Park Study which he will keep updating the master list and send them out occasionally but not every day. VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Kathryn Peterson indicated as long as she has lived in Edina there has been a rule that no access is given to the athletic fields before April 1 S`h and asked given the climate changes if any thought has been given to retook at it or add some variability to it based on the turf and that sort of thing. Mr. Keprios replied absolutely he thinks they have to remain flexible and meet the needs and desires of their residents so it is something that they are going to have to revisit on a year by year basis. Member Segreto stated that she read in the Sun Current that the City Council was moving meetings in connection, with other religious holidays other than Christians and the Jewish faith and asked if any of their meetings conflict with these other holidays. Mr. Keprios replied not this year that he is aware of yet. Member Cella asked Mr. Keprios that when he updates them with the emails from the various citizens if he could somehow at the end of one update but a colored line or colored asterisk so they will know the next time what emails have been added. Mr. Keprios responded that is a good suggestion and they will start doing that. Member Jones gave the Park Board an update on the Naming and Donations working group. She noted that right now they are in the middle of a public comment period for a Naming Policy and Donation Policy. She indicated that the working group will be meeting on April 23`d to discuss any feedback and asked the Park Board if they had any questions, suggestions or comments about the two policies to give that to the working group as soon as they can. She stated that they have updated the policies since their last meeting and did receive input from Mr. Keprios and Mr. Neal so their comments have been incorporated into the policies. IX STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board they are moving forward with the installation of the flow rider at _ the Aquatic Center and they seem to be on schedule. The City Council approved an award of bid to provide the themed structure for the flow rider. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board they have been working with consultants on the sports dome site study and have had their first meeting. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he does plan to have the Edinborough Park issue back on the May Park Board agenda. Meeting adjourned at 8:33 pm. E