Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012-06-19_COUNCIL MEETING
4 Y AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 19, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER ll. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of June 5, 2012 And Work Session Of June 5, 2012, B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 06/07/2012, TOTAL $799,907.09, And Per Pre -List Dated 06/14/12 TOTAL $949044.15 C. Residential Curbside Recycling Contract D. Resolution No. 2012 -88 Appointing Primary Election Judges E. Request For Purchase — 2013 Insurance Renewal: General Liability and Workers Compensation F. Request For Purchase — 2013 Insurance Renewal: Property G. Request For Purchase — Consultant Engineering construction Phase Services — Tracy Avenue Reconstruction Project H. Resolution, No. 2012 -90 Adopting The Performance Measures Developed By The Council On Local Results And Innovation And The 2012 Performance Measure Report V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Receive Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement (CAFR) For Year Ended December 31, 2011 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is v Agenda/Edina City Council June 19, 2012 Page 2 relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following' guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to ,three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers 'and limit testimony to the matter under-consideration. • In''order, to 'maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - To Construct A New Home One -Foot Above The First Floor Elevation Of The Existing Home At 5537 Park Place For Kate Schmitt, Resolution No. 2012 -84 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - To Construct 'A New Home One -Foot Above The First Floor Elevation Of The Existing Home At 4805 East Sunny slope For Doug And Abby Power, Resolution No. 2012 -85 (Favorable Vote Of Majority Of Council Members Present To Approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION REQUEST — Portion of West 41" Street and Natchez Avenue, Jennifer and Mathias Samuel, Resolution No. 2012 -86 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) D. PUBLIC) HEARING - COCINA DEL BARRIO APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY – Resolution No. 2012 -89 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2012 -87 Accepting Various Donations B. Amendment No. 1 To Southdale Redevelopment Agreement C. Resolution No. 2012 -91 Authorizing Application For Grant Funds For Completion Of Edina Promenade Phase III And IV IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence v Tues Tues Tues Tues Wed Tues Tues Mon Mon Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Wed Wed Ties es sues Tues -Agenda/Edina City Council June 19, 2012 Page 3 B. Receive Petition Requesting Sidewalk South Side of Interlachen Boulevard X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of January 17, 2011 III. Amendment No. 1 To Southdale Redevelopment Agreement (Favorable vote of majority of Commissioners Present to Approve) IV. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Jun 19 Closed Session — Legal Consultation Mediation Matter 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Jun 19 Joint Work Session — Edina Community Health Committee 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Jun 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Jul 3 MEETING CANCELLED Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jul 17 Joint Work Session — Business Meeting/Work Plan 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Jul 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Aug 6 Joint Work Session — Heritage Preservation Board 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Aug 14 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Aug 21 Work Session — Budget Process 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sept 3 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Sept 4 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sept 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sept 19 Work Session — Board & Commissions Work Plan Proposals 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sept 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 2 Work Session — CIP Workshop 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 16 Work Session — Business Meeting/Work Plan 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS rw MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 5, 2012 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Public Works Director Brian Olson and Administrative Intern Ari Klugman introduced.themseIves. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item W.C., Resolution No. 2012 -81, Lot Division (Lot Line Adjustment) 6240 and 6244 Brookview Avenue for Chad Trierweiler; Item W.G., Request to Purchase, 2012 Parking Lot and Pathway Improvements Contract No. Pk12 -2 PK; Item W.H., Request to Purchase, Tracy Avenue Improvements Contract No. ENG12 -5; and, Item IV.L. Traffic Safety Report of May 2, 2012, as follows: W.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of May 15, 2012 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 17, 2012, and consisting of 34 pages; General Fund $292,323.96; Police Special Revenue $104.93; Braemar Memorial Fund $3,984.31; Working Capital Fund $21,861.44; Equipment Replacement Fund $11,303.00; Art Center Fund $3,817.54; Aquatic Center Fund $296.40; Golf Course Fund $47,031.17; Ice Arena Fund $18,159.83; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $7,704.21; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $7,259.31; Liquor Fund $275,971.00; Utility Fund $265,021.98; Storm Sewer Fund $7,268.66; Recycling Fund $127.66; PSTF Agency Fund $2,125.48; TOTAL $964.360.88 and for approval of payment of claims dated May 24,, 2012, and consisting of 28 pages; General Fund $130,831.66, Police Special Revenue $386.00; Working Capital Fund $76,351.38; Equipment Replacement Fund $24,995.90; Art Center Fund $2,698.45; Aquatic Center Fund $2,830.84; Golf Course' Fund _ $11,877.83; - Ice Arena Fund $4,045.71; Edinborough Park Fund ,$1,814.90; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,610.56; Liquor Fund $172,394.42; Utility Fund $744,646.22; Storm Sewer Fund $164,339.97; PSTF Agency Fund. $5,292.19; Payroll Fund $5,336.75; TOTAL $1,352.452.78: and for approval of payment of claims dated May 31, 2012, and consisting of 29 pages; General .Fund $133,863.75; DNU Old Communications Fund $72.00; Police Special Revenue $444.17; Working Capital.Fund $9,775.69; Equipment Replacement Fund $84,128.04; Art Center Fund $274.19; Aquatic Center Fund $3,064.10; Golf Course Fund $18,207.41; Ice Arena Fund $9,507.06; Edinborough Park Fund $5,895.50; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $19,386.87; Liquor Fund $194,397.31; Utility Fund $124,658.49; Storm Sewer Fund $2,125.00; Recycling Fund $7,176.95; PSTF Agency Fund $1,922.90; Payroll Fund $3,403.92; TOTAL $618.303.35; and, Credit Card Transactions dated March 27 — April 27, 2012; TOTAL $23.172.18. 1-9. C. Racah-t8an hip 2 ision (Lot Line Adjustment) 6240 and G244 fteekwipw Ayawum f4w Chad xroppWpuff IV.D. Approve license to operate and FLOW Membership Agreement IV.E. Request to Purchase, Toughbooks for Edina Police Department squad cars, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Compar, Inc, at $92,118.76. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 5. 2012 IV.F. Request to Purchase, Redundant Public Safety Mission Critical and Non - Mission Critical Systems, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Sungard Public Sector, OSSI Division at $71,039.00. IV.I. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -82, Requesting Advanced Municipal State Aid funding for Tracy Avenue Improvements IV.J. Request to Purchase, office :furniture for Communications and Technology Department, awarding the bid tathe recommended low bidder, Henricksen PSG at $51,956.14. IVX Request to Purchase, Fiber Optic Cabling — Arneson Acres Park and Greenhouse Improvement FO -008, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Utility Services, Inc:_:at $24,900.00. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -81 ADOPTED LOT DIVISION (LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT) 6240 AND 6244 BROOKVIEW AVENUE FOR CHAD TRIERWEILER Planning Director Teague indicated the revised resolution referred- to' exceptions within the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance relating to process and excluding the public hearing requirement or posting a front yard sign since in this case the lot line was only being 'shifted. He indicated the side yard setback requirement for an attached garage was five feet and for living space, it was ten feet. Both the existing and resulting lots exceeded setback requirements. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -81, approving a Lot Division of 6240 and 6244 Brookview Avenue, revising the last sentence to indicate: "...that no further lot line adjustment shall be made..." based on the following finding: 1. The existing and proposed lots meet all minimum lot size requirements. And subject to the following condition: 1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ' IV.G. REQUEST TO PURCHASE, 2012 PARKING LOT AND PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. PK12 -2 PK — APPROVED The Council discussed its support for,inclusion of sustainable infrastructure, where feasible, and making application for grants to offset additional costs. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving Request .to Purchase, 2012 Parking Lot and Pathway In Contract No. Pk1'24 PK, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,' Bituminous Roadway, Inc. at $402,869.75, subject to continued consideration of sustainable infrastructure and grant funding. Ayes: Bennett; Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. W.H. REQUEST TO PURCHASE, TRACY AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. ENG12 -5'— APPROVED Engineer Houle advised of the three bids received for the Tracy Avenue Improvement Project and recommended change order to delete the sanitary sewer treatment structure at the intersection of Warden and Tracy Avenues since the bid for that component was double the consultant's estimate. He described the project components and indicated the sanitary sewer treatment structure would be Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 5.2012 relocated and reb „id at a future time. Mr. Knutson advised the change order would be considered by the Council since it was over $100,000. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving Request to Purchase, Tracy Avenue Improvements Contract No. ENG 12 -5, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Eureka Construction at $1,376,748.38. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. L. REVISED TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF MAY 2, 2012 —ACCEPTED Mr. Houle answered questions of the Council and indicated staff, recommended accepting the May 2, 2012 Traffic Safety Report which had been revised as of May 17, and included - the recommendations of the Edina, Transportation :Commission. The Council asked that the Edina Transportation Commission look at the 66th Avenue corridor in conjunction with Bike Boulevard. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded -by Member Bennett, accepting.revised Traffic Safety Report of. May 2,2012 as presented. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson,` Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. EDINA GREEN MACHINE ROBOTICS TEAM PRESENTATION Members of the Edina Green Machine Robotics Team introduced themselves and reported that while at a national competition the Team's business plan had received an Entrepreneurial Award and that its robot, built to shoot basketballs, had been eliminated in the semi -final competition. Mayor Hovland was presented with a basketball for display at City Hall. The Council congratulated the Edina Green Machine Robotics Team on its accomplishments. V.B. CENTERPOINT ENERGY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP GRANT TO EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENTED Tod Nargren, CenterPoint Energy, presented the $2,500 Community Partnership Grant to the Edina Fire Department. Fire Chief Scheerer indicated this grant would be used to replace older equipment. The Council extended its appreciation to CenterPoint Energy for this generous donation. Vl. COMMUNITY COMMENT Shannon Ingham, 4360 France Avenue, Unit #6, suggested the Council acquire the Minnesota Museum of American Art collection for display as the focal point for the Grandview Development. VII.. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VILA. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-83 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained:that in order_, to comply. with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and 'moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -83 accepting various donations. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rolicall: Ayes:.Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. B. EDINA ART CENTER STUDY RFP —APPROVED Mr. Keprios reviewed past Council consideration of the Art Center Study RFP and presented the Art Center Board's recommendation to accept the new proposal dated May .10, 2012, from Sutton & Associates at $21,000.00 to analyze and make recommendations for operations of the Edina Art Center. Mr. Keprios answered question of the Council and indicated the issue. of location or whether the Art Center should be. moved was not part of the new focus, but could.be addressed through a follow up study. The Council noted the scope of services was comprehensive and included the Art Center's weakness, Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 5, 2012 strengths, and could address the issue of location. Mr. Keprios stated staff would make that issue a focus with the consultant. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the revised Art Center Study scope of services proposal of Sutton & Associates at $21,000. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. BRAEMAR GOLF DOME —APPROVED Mr. Keprios described staffs analysis and recommendation to construct a replacement golf dome in the same location as the current Braemar Golf Dome and the new construction technique that would extend the longevity of the dome. Mr. Keprios responded to the Council's questions by advising of the accessible restroom facilities, customer counter, and similar retail. The Council asked staff to consider replicating a retail model found to be successful in other venues. Manager Neal advised settlement negotiations were on -going with Traveler's Insurance Company. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the construction of a replacement golf dome in the same location as the Braemar Golf Dome. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.D. SPORTS DOME FEASIBILITY STUDY — PHASE TWO SITE LOCATION STUDY — REFERRED TO WORKING GROUP Mr. Keprios presented the Phase Two Site Location feasibility study for a sports /golf dome and finding it was physically and financially infeasible given soils correction estimated at $1.5 million. Thus, staff recommended asking the Park Board Sports Dome Working Group to reevaluate other site(s). The Council discussed other potential locations and indicated it was not averse to the option of purchasing a site. Mr. Keprios advised there was a site in Edina with that opportunity, which could be looked at if so directed by the Council. The Council considered whether the soccer field north of Braemar Ice Arena was a potential site and indicated a school property or location adjacent to residential would not be acceptable due to concerns with after -hours accessibility and transportation. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, authorizing the Park Board Sports Dome Working Group to reconvene for the purpose of recommending alternative sites for Park Board and City Council consideration as to a sports dome location with the guidance that the Council was not closed to purchasing a site but would not support sites adjacent to the High School or residential. Ayes:.Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VILE. SOUTHDALE APARTMENTS SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHDALE — STUART COMPANY — SITE PLAN REVIEWED Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the sketch plan for Southdale Apartments located on the southeast corner of Southdale for an upscale, market rate ten- and six -story apartment building; and, a three -story townhouse building on a 5.1 -acre site. The proposal would include 232 units with parking underneath the structure and primary access off 691h Street and the Southdale frontage road. The proposed density would be 45 units per acre. Mr. Teague explained the applicant was considering either a rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) or a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with two variances (building setback and parking) under the existing PC -3 zoning. Should the Council be asked to consider a PUD rezoning, it would also need to determine whether a Small Area Plan was required. Mr. Teague presented the site and building plans and indicated if considered formally, a parking and traffic study would be needed as well as a sewer capacity study. Mr. Teague displayed pictures of the proposed buildings and aerial views to provide context. He advised the Planning Commission, on May 23, 2012, Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /June S. 2012 reviewed the site plan and raised the following issues: need for pedestrian connections to and from Southdale and the Galleria; shared front entrance elements; user amenities; height comparison in relation to Southdale and Westin, bicycle rack locations, bus routes, and the big picture plan for Southdale. The Council asked questions of Mr. Teague relating to the need for a lot line adjustment or subdivision that would create a new plat and require park dedication. Proponent Presentation Ryan Duddley advised of Stuart Company's development history of rental housing and properties under ownership. David Motzenbecker, Landscape Architect with BKV Group, described the relocation of the sidewalk to create more buffer and green space, resulting in a park -like iconic corner at York Avenue and 69th Street. He presented the landscape plan, noting the locations of berming, screening, visitor's drop off plaza, guest parking, pedestrian- focused connections to the south and east crosswalks, and sidewalk connections to the Galleria and Southdale. Michael Krych, Architect, described BKV Group's integrated approach to design and noted the subject site was located in an area with larger - scaled buildings and parking expanses but properties across York Avenue contained smaller scaled components. Mr. Krych stated the intention was to create a use that related to surrounding property yet created its own iconic identity and branded environment. The project was comprised of a collection of three buildings, two of which related directly to the intersection and grid of York Avenue and 69th Street while the northwestern facing portion created a broad gesture toward Southdale. He indicated the three buildings combined to create larger scale massing and the use of materials would be important in creating a great integrated living environment, something identifiable that was good for tenants and the community, providing connectivity, addressing traffic and safety, and offering sustainability. Mr. Teague answered the Council's questions related to density and floor area ratio. The Council discussed the site plan and voiced its support for mixed use and the concept of the site plan, indicating it was willing to consider the project under the CUP process since the variance requests (building setback and parking) would be justified. It also supported the requested density and considering a simple lot line adjustment rather than a lot subdivision to eliminate the requirement for park dedication. The Council offered the proponent the following suggestions: creation of a mid -block pedestrian crossing and single -lane roundabout to calm traffic on 69th Street and create connectivity; elimination of free right turn at York Avenue and 69th Street intersection; green roof amenities to create a park -like view aesthetic and hide mechanicals; beautification opportunities for the outdoor pool during off season or creation of an indoor pool that would attract occupancy; design pedestrian connectivity to Southdale, the Promenade, and Galleria such a pathway lined with overstory canopy trees; assure connectivity between the buildings and streets via correctly placed /designed podium wall or building orientation to eliminate the impression of a walled community /enclave; locate building uses to eliminate late -night ambient light; assure right sized units to accommodate tenants of all ages and family configurations; appropriate building materials color pallet; planning for a children's play facility; and locating bicycle racks. Page 5 INN* 0-00 Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /June S. 2012 The Council stated concerns about the loss of parking spaces for shoppers and transit users and identified the possible need for a proof of parking agreement. Member Bennett noted that the Comprehensive Plan embraced mixed use in this district, including commercial /retail and residential, and that a small area plan was not needed to define allowable uses. However, there was need for more study, design and information relating to traffic impacts, parking, and utilities including storm and sanitary sewer infrastructure capacity. The Council commended the proponent for getting off to a good start and encouraged the creation of an extraordinary, iconic project. Vlll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received X. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received Xl. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 19, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 5, 2012, meeting available. Page 6 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 5, 2012 5:05 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager, Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; and John Wallin, Finance Director. Rusty Fifield and Tammy ,Omdal, Consultants from Northland Securities were present. Mayor Hovland noted the purpose of the work session was to review Infrastructure Finance and potential franchise fees. Rusty Fifield of Northland Securities made a presentation explaining some funding alternatives. He utilized data from current projects and projected different scenarios using seven options: 1) 80% of street costs assessed, 2) 50% of street costs assessed, 3) 20% of street costs assessed, 4) maximum assessment capped at $9,000 /unit, 5) Flat $7,000 per unit, 6) 25% of total project costs assessed and 7) Current methodology but with a 15 -year term and 1% interest mark -up over bonding costs. The financial ramifications of each methodology were reviewed and discussed. Discussion points. included: ways to improve communication with residents regarding improvement projects, the relationship of work performed to the value of the project and the homeowners' ability to pay, negative arbitrage, perceived value of reconstruction projects, potential effect on City's bond rating if special assessment terms were lengthened, clarification of who pays costs for service updates from main to house, gathering citizen input through some kind of forum. Manager Neal reviewed with the council the potential revenue that would be generated if franchise fees were implemented on the City's utility providers of gas and electricity. It was noted a franchise fee:was already_in place for _cable television._ Mr. Neal explained- that together franchise fees for both gas and electricity could generate about $900,000 which could then be used to fund the expansion and improvement of the City's non- motorized transportation network. He reviewed in detail how the funds would be utilized and how to implement franchise fees. Following discussion the Council directed staff to proceed with the necessary steps for implementing franchise fees. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 19, 2012. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk l James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 1 617/2012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 359698 6/712012 110728 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER 85.00 CODE ADMINISTRATION SEMINAR 289313 JUNE14 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 85.00 359899 61712012 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 8.11 SOD 00001395 288950 34184 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 8.11 359900 61712012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 879.45 UB TEMP 288949 35549938 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 731.52 UB TEMP 289314 35595075 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 855.47 ..UB TEMP 289315 35595076 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 2,466.44 359901 6/712012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 76.40 288874 1574015 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.60 289106 1574016 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 59.60 289107 1575518 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 58.00 289247 1575511 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 261.60 359902 6!712012 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES 195.50 TRAILER REPAIRS 00003802 289171 S028157 - 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 195.50 359903 61712012 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 104.22 ALARM SERVICE 288951 71329211 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 104.22 359904 61712012 106991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 311.88 COFFEE, CUPS, LIDS 288781 97328 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 311.88 359905 61712012 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 104.02 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 289172 114136 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 104.02 359906 61712012 130322 AMBERGATE GARDENS 80.80 FLOWERS 00006210 289062 BRAEMAR GOLF 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COURSE 80.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/712012 - 6/7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 359907 61712012 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 64.98 289105 053112 5821.6201 LAUNDRY= 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 95.41 289105 053112 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 132.88 289105 053112 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 142.60 289105 053112 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 239.80 269105 053112 5421:6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 249.78 289105 053112 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 490.08 289105 053112 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,415.53. 359908 6/712012 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 31,904.48 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 00004007 288952 10322134 -00 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 809.41 COPIER PAPER 289063 10325377 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 32,713.89 359909 SM2012 102172 APPER74S FOODSERVICE 465.45 FOOD 288782 1734460 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 382:78 FOOD 288783 1740753 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,084.78 FOOD 289064. 1744543 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 28.11- CREDIT 289065 1740979 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 350.78 FOOD 289173 1744239 5730.5510' COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 2,255.68 359910 61712012 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 4,945.00 FL'OWRIDER BACKWASH DRAIN 00007111 289066 38959 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 4,945.00 359911 6/712012 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 110.63 COFFEE 289067 1020981 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 110.63 359912 6/712012 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 289316 060112 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 289316 060112 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 269316 060112 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 66.29 289316 060112 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.66 289316 060112 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 73.92 289316 060112 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 82.85 289316 060112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 90.08 289316 060112 5641.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 99.35 289316 060112 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 198.28 289316 060112 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 616/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 3 6/7/2012 - 6/7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 207.79 289316 060112 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 211.25 289316 060112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL .217.25 289316 060112 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 217.75 289316 060112 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 217.76 289316 060112 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 309.03 289316 060112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 399.03 289316 060112 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 646.03 289316 060112 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,216.31 359913 61712012 120996 AVR INC. 516.21 READY MIX 00005242 288953 61369 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 405.06 288954 61241 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 719.09 .288955 61110 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 655.14 288956 61044 5913.6520 CONCRETE- DISTRIBUTION 1,099.74 288957 61443 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 460.63 288958 61509 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 655.14 288959 61915 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 460.63 288960 61837 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,532.59 288961 62388 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,071.96 288962 62313 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 794.08 288963 62237 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 516.21 288964 62063 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 8,886.48 359914 61712012 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 500.36 BATTERIES 00005266 288784 16678 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 288.35- CREDIT 288785 C23039 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 212.01 359915 6!712012 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG 75.48 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289102 053112 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 75.48 359916 6/7/2012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 521.15 288875 73668700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 85.01 288876 86805000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 195.58 288877 6190300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 31.14 288878 86804900 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 138.13 288879 86805100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 292.61 288880 73665100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 36.55 288881 73665000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 61612012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 4 6M2612 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 91.55 288882 73391600 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 98.47 289108 86805300 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 119.87 289109 86805200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX . YORK SELLING 216.28 289248 86834900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 36.55 289249 73746700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX -VERNON SELLING 322.80 289250 6192800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,185.69 359917 6/7/2012 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 31.85 ART WORK SOLD 289011 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.85 369918 6/7/2012 116067 BENSON, RON PAUL 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 289012 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES' 39.00 359919 617/2012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 90.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003025 288965 WO- 774779 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22.43 FILE FOLDERS 00009150 289174 OE- 286523 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 11.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009155 289175 OE- 287816 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 124.45 359920 61712012 100176 BESSER GLASS & MIRROR 76.63 GLASS REPAIR 00002029 289141 129066 5761:6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 76.63 359921 6/7/2012 121619 BLANEK, HARRY 200.00 BOOTS 289176 053112 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 359922 6/7/2012 120510 BLOOMINGTON CUSTOM EMBROIDERY 38.00 POLO SHIRT 288966 31607 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 38.00 359923 617/2012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 8.73 LITHIUM BATTERIES 288786 77358 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 50.02 CDs, SLEEVES 00001437 288787 77411 5913.6406 _ GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 20.79 WRIST REST PAD 00001437 288788 77415 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 79.54 359924 61712012 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 816:50 MATERIALS TESTING 288789 351453 05499.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-499 RAW WATER WELL2 TO WTP6 R55CKREG LOG20000 3,784.75 CITY OF EDINA 359925 Council Check Register 125553, BROCKMAN; WENDY 61712012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 814.75 MATERIALS TESTING 288790 351452 01385.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 472.50 MATERIALS TESTING 288967 351591 05522.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 665.50 MATERIALS TESTING 288968 351592 05524.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 665.50 MATERIALS TESTING 288968 351592 03470.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 350.00 MATERIALS TESTING 288969 351583 01334.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION ART WORK SOLD 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page- 5 Business Unit 'COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD COUNTRYSIDE VALLEY ESTATES VALLEY ESTATES BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PRINTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES POOL OPERATION 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST'SELLING FIBER OPTIC CABLING 3,784.75 359925 61712012 125553, BROCKMAN; WENDY 24.70 ART WORK SOLD 289218 053112 5101.4413 24.70 359926 61712012 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6 /12112 289095 051412 5760.6136 200.00 - 359927 617/2012 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 771.61 NEWSLETTERS 00008273 289068 28022 1628.6575 771.61 359928 61712012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 330.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 289229 060412 1550.6103 15.00 289317 060512 1550.6103 345.00 359929 6/7/2012 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 332.40 GOLF BALLS 289230 923544622 5440.5511 498.60 GOLF BALLS 289231 923533809 5440.5511 831.00 359930 6/712012 130315 CANNON VALLEY SPECIALTIES 487.35 BEACH TOWELS WITH LOGO 288970 AQUATIC CTR 5311.6406 487.35 359931 6/712012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 695.20 288883 101845 5822.5514 .47.85 288884 101844 5822.5515 156.80 288885 99957 5842.5514 254.80 288886 -98267 5822.5514 1,154.65 359932 61712012 112811 CASTREJON INC. 35,104.00 FIBER OPTIC NETWORK EXPANSIOM001052 288971 11226 46001.6710 ART WORK SOLD 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page- 5 Business Unit 'COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD COUNTRYSIDE VALLEY ESTATES VALLEY ESTATES BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PRINTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES POOL OPERATION 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST'SELLING FIBER OPTIC CABLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 617/2012 — 617/2012 Check # Dale Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 35,104.00 359933 61712012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 359934 6!712012 TELEPHONE 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE CENT SVC P.W BUILDING' 19.24 5528973-0 288791 5528973 -5/12 1552.6186 19.24 359935 61712012 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 467.18 ENVELOPES 00001341 288792 70244 5917.6406 165.40 ENVELOPES 288793 70240 1260.6406 632.58 359936 61712012 123898 CENTURYLINK 40.39 952 922 -9246 289030 9246 -5/12 1400.6188 114.41 952 920 -8166 289031 8166 -5/12 1550.6188 55.44 952 922 -2444 269032 2444 -5/12 1550.6188 121.41 952 831 -0024 289033 0024 -5/12 1552.6188 331.65 359937 6/712012 129826 CITIZENS LEAGUE 2,500.00 CIVIC LEADERS MEMBERSHIP 289069 053012 1500.6103 2,500.00 359938 617/2012 102165 CLEVELAND GOLF 113.79 MERCHANDISE 289232 3762744S7 5440.5511 113.79 359939 6/712012 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 55.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289099 053112 1600.6107 55.50 359940 617/2012 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 800.80 JUNE 2012 MAINTENANCE 288794 053012 5841.6103 800.80 359941 6/712012 120433 COMCAST 82.46 8772 10 614 0165667 289177 165667 -5/12 5424.6406 82.46 6/612012 9:42:45 Page - 6 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING.GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE CENT SVC P.W BUILDING' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY RANGE R55CKREG LOG20000 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 288797 412800 CITY OF EDINA 36.36 COST OF GOODS SOLD 352.35 413018 288688 651905 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 530.25 57.74 288889 652761 61712012 - 6/7/2012 50TH ST SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 359942 61712012 652905 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,038.45 18.16 KEMPER TOOLS 00009153 289178 INV000069164 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 61.93 18.16 650243624 -5/12 69.55 ART WORK SOLD 289013 052912 359943 61712012 ART CENTER REVENUES 124487 CORDES, ANN 15.82 ART WORK SOLD 289219 053112 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 15.82 359944 6/7/2012 102596 CROWN TROPHY 141.60 . ENGRAVING 289179 31042 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 141.60 359945 61712012 104020 DALCO 157.11 GRILL CLEANER 00006009 288795 2465226 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 254.96 STAIN CLEANER 00006009 288796 2465923 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 193.08 HAND TOWELS 00001454 289142 2467034 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 605.15 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page- 7 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER REVENUES PUBLIC ART GRILL GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 359946 6/712012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 288797 412800 5421.5510 36.36 COST OF GOODS SOLD 352.35 413018 288688 651905 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 530.25 57.74 288889 652761 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,112.85 289251 652904 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.00 289252 652905 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,038.45 359960 6/712012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 359947 61712012 124357 DELANEY, ALICE 61.93 289143 650243624 -5/12 69.55 ART WORK SOLD 289013 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 69.55 359948 61712012 100720 • DENNYS M AVE. BAKERY 74.26 BAKERY 288797 412800 5421.5510 36.36 COST OF GOODS SOLD 288798 413018 5421.5510 164.84 289070 413269 5421.5510 57.74 289071 413270 5421.5510 333.20 359949 61712012 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY - 5,918.91 APRIL 2012 SURCHARGE 289072 14246053060 1495.4380 5,918.91 359960 6/712012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 61.93 289143 650243624 -5/12 5760.6122 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6n/2012 - 6/712012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 61.93 359951 6/712012 123995 DICICSILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,408.23 REFUSE 288799 _ 1385782 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,135.77 REFUSE 288800 1380228 4095.6103• PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,544.00 359952 6/7/2012 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 683.32 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 289180 29643 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 683.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 288180 29643 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 683.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 289180 29643. 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,050.00 359953 6/712012 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 386.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289140 060112 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 386.25 359954 6/7/2012 104192 DYNAMIC BRANDS 93.60 MERCHANDISE 289233 779552 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 93.60 359955 6!7/2012 100744, EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 75.00 APRIL 2012 288972 TICKETS 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 225.00 APRIL 2012 288972 TICKETS 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 325.00 MAY 2012 288972 TICKETS 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 375.00 APRIL 2012 288972 TICKETS 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,375.00 MAY 2012 288972 TICKETS 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,425.00 MAY 2012 288972 TICKETS 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 3,800.00 359956 61712012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 166.66 TASTE OF EDINA 2012 288973 GLASS SPONSOR 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 166.67 TASTE OF EDINA 2012 288973 GLASS SPONSOR 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 166.67 TASTE OF EDINA 2012 288973 GLASS SPONSOR 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 500.00 359957 61712012 101596 EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION 6,000.00 CONCESSION STAND EQUIPMENT 289073 052912 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,000.00 359958 6/712012 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 616/2012 9:42:45 Page - 8 Business Unit 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 432.30 WINE 00006338 288801 148 5421.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/7/2012 — 6/7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 432.30 359959 61712012 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 1,417.50 5K RACE 289103 053112 1428.6010 1,417.50 359960 61712012 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 504.00 PERMIT 42694 WOMENS VOLLEYBALL 268802 13174 4077.6406 504.00 359961 617/2012 105906 EGAN COMPANY 1,866.87 INSTALL SAW CUT LOOPS 288803 JC10066474 1301.6160 1,866.88 INSTALL SAW CUT LOOPS 288803 JC10066474 1330.6180 3,733.75 359962 61712012 100049 EHLERS 2,195.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 288974 63004 3101.6103 2,195.00 359963 617/2012 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,136.00 MAY 2012 BILLINGS 289318 060112 1470.6103 6,136.00 359964 61712012 102497 EXPLORER POST 926 1,732.50 5K RACE 289104 053112 1428.6010 1,732.50 359965 61712012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 102.01 ROTORS, PADS 00006237 288804 69- 066918 1553.6530 21.07- CREDIT 288605 1- 3899681 1553.6530 94.99 SENSORS 00005237 288975 69- 067213 1553.6530 175.93 359966 6/7/2012 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 21.51 SHIPPING 00006364 289181 062200026520 5440.6122 21.51 359967 6/7/2012 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 7,492.07 METERS 00001328 288806 S01361890.001 05536.1705 272.27 HYDRANT WRENCH 00001314 288807 501363023.001 5913.6406 2,703.56 HYDRANT 00001314 288808 501362799.001 5913.6406 10,467.90 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page- 9 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WATER METER REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page - 10 Business Unit VERNON SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES 69.58 SHOES 288809 4320837 5440.5511. R55CKREG LOG20000 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA SHOES 288810 4332615 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Council Check Register 465.79 MERCHANDISE 288811 - 4333048. 6f7/2012 - 6/7/2012 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 359968 6/712012 SHOP RETAIL SALES 129600 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 149.33 STAFF SHIRTS 289074 4335991 134.00 GENERAL•SUPPLIES 288890 4671 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 134.00 359969 61712012 70.05 123818 FLEURY, CYNTHIA 289234 4343526 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 52.00 ART WORK SOLD 289014 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 289235 4352692 52.00 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 359970 61712012 289236 101475 FOOTJOY 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page - 10 Business Unit VERNON SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES 69.58 SHOES 288809 4320837 5440.5511. COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.87 SHOES 288810 4332615 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP.RETAIL SALES 465.79 MERCHANDISE 288811 - 4333048. 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 312.50- CREDIT 288812 6915185 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP SHOP RETAIL SALES 149.33 STAFF SHIRTS 289074 4335991 5410.6406 GENERAL•SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 70.05 SHOES 289234 4343526 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,307.36 SHOES 289235 4352692 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 727.14 SHOES 289236 4344660 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,551.62 359971 6/7/2012 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 55.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289144 060112 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 55.50 359972 617/2012 120113 FRANCIS, JOYCE 17.13 ART WORK SOLD 289015 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 17.13 359973 61712012 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 48.62 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289319 060112 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 48.62 359974 617/2012 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 187.39 REPAIR ICE MACHINE 288813 1305393 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 187.39 359975 6/7/2012 103185 GERTENS 113.29 PLANTINGS 00001381 288976 253165 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 19.22 CEDAR MULCH 00001387 289145 253438 1644:6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 132.51 359976 6/712012 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/612012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 11 6M2012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 289016 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 359977 6/712012 130325 GLOBAL GAMES 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/14/12 289098 050612 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE " 200.00 359978 61712012 117811 GOLBERG, CAROLYN 36.40 ART WORK SOLD 289017 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 36.40 359979 61712012 101103 GRAINGER 24.05 CLAMP 00005214 288814 9833435275 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 243.46 WALL SHELVING 00005174 288977 9834208622 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 195.67 GLOVES 00001367 289214 9836609595 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 277.85- RETURN 00001258 289215 9836222365 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 185.33 359980 6/712012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 16.00- 288891 139660ADJ 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 122.25 288892 139832 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,035.25 288893 139971 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,141.50 359981 6/712012 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 157.07 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 288978 053012 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 157.07 359982 6/712012 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 48.00 STRUTS 00001396 288979 960460899 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 429.13 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 00001396 288979 960460899 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 477.13 359983 61712012 102126 GREG LESSMAN SALES 80.93 MERCHANDISE 00006404 289182 47054 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 80.93 359984 61712012 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 5,219.00 LESSONS 289075 053012 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5,219.00 359985 61712012 100165 GRITTON, KAY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/7/2012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 67.60 ART WORK SOLD 289018 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 67.60 359986 61712012 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 770.71 TRIMMERS & SUPPLIES 00001378 288980 15449 1641.6556 TOOLS MOWING 770.71 359987 61712012 100788 H &L MESABI 8,148.36 PLOW BLADES 00005999 288981 85277 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8,148.36 359988 61712012 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 60.48 HUBS, LATHS 00001754 288815 8927 01386.1705.31 MATERIALSISUPPLIES VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD 60.49 HUBS, LATHS 00001754 288815 8927 01387.1705.31 MATERIALSISUPPLIES VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD 481.64 HUBS, LATHS 00001754 288815 8927 01385.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD 602.61 359989 61712012 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,178.65 CHEMICALS 00005243 288816 3341161 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,304.57 CHEMICALS 00005243 288817 3339742 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES. WATER TREATMENT 6,483.22 359990 6/7/2012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 288818 023897 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 289183 023910 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 306.24 359991 6/712012 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 289135 0820694 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 359992 6R/2012 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 1,404.03 PCS 00004335 288819 51277521 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN -MIS 17.98 SPEAKER BAR 00004335 288820 51261918 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 329.83 MONITORS 00004335 288820 51261918 421552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUIL CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 2,736.76 PRINTERS FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004335 288820 51261918 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 4,488.60 359993 61712012 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 115.25 WASHCLOTHS 00002139 288821 600235034 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 619.37 SANITIZER, ASSURANCE 00002139 288822 600235033 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 64.89 AEROSOL CITRUS -SCRUB 00002152 289184 600251986 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 616/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/7/2012 - 6M2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300.34 MOPS, FOAM WASH 00002147 289185 600247249 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,099.85 359994 61712012 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 125.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/17/12 289096 050212 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 125.00 359996 61712012 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,075.63 288894 602284 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,881.50 288895 602236 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,452.35- 288896 602822 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.00 289253 603071 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 247.50 289254 603070 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,712.98 359996 6/712012 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 444.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 288982 053012 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 444.55 359997 61712012 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 15.14 ARTWORK SOLD 289019 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.14 359998 61712012 129430 HYDROTECH SYSTEMS LTD 60,843.00 FLOWRIDER START UP 289076 N35A5 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 60,843.00 359999 61712012 122565 HYSER, TIMOTHY 798.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289138 060112 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 798.25 360000 61712012 125093 ILVONEN, ILONA 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 289020 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 360001 61712012 127184 IVERSON, KATHLEEN 65.00 ART WORK SOLD 244985 083110 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 360002 61712012 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 276071 120111 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/7/2012 - 6/7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360003 6/712012 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 79.10 TOILET SERVICE 289077 53263 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 79.10 289078 53264 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 158.20 360004 617/2012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,255.60 288897 1786905 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 24.50 r 288898 1786906 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 161.35 288899 1823609 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,388.42 288900 1786943 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 38.80 288901 1786944 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 105.40 289186 1776336 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 8,974.07 360006 617/2012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 325.40 288902 1305230 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,623.73 288903 1305226 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 171.49 288904 1305231 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.99 288905 1303891 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,148.87 288906 1303888 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,782.86 288907 1303890 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1:12 288908 1303885 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 277.52 288909 1303881 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 28.98 288910 1283336 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 41.98 288911 1304392 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 484.74 288912 1304391 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 388.72 289110 1308852 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - YORK SELLING 976.32 289111 1308854 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING, 98.11 289112 1308849 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2.24 289113 1308842 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,607.58 289114 1308850 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,587.69 289115 1308851 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 21582.67 289116 1308853 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 141.00 289117 1305809 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20.99 289118 1308861 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,525.30 289255 1308846 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 159.68 289256 1308845 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 543.84 269257 1308844 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 347.32 289258 1308841 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 937.99 289259 1308840 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 32.12 289260 1308862 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 616/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 15 617/2012 - 61712012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 35.37 289261 1308856 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING - 2,356.13 289262 1308857 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 196.48 289263 1308843 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,961.90 289264 1308860 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING ' 1.12 289265 1308847 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 685.67 289266 1308858 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 193.80 289267 1308863 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 481.75 289268 1308859 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,812.39 289269 1308855 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 29,583.86 360007 6/712012 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 117.65 ART WORK SOLD 289021 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 117.65 360008 61712012 123696 JOHNSTON, TORI . 34.45 ART WORK SOLD 289022 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 34.45 360009 61712012 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 214.01 ACTUATOR 00001307 289079 145303 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 214.01 360010 6/712012 118336 JONES AND BARTLETT LEARNING LL 1,397.96 LIFEGUARD TRAINING MANUALS 289187 2537392 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,397.96 360011 6/7/2012 111018 KEEPRS INC. 229.99 UNIFORMS 00003791 289188 189911 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 229.99 360012 6/7/2012 118995 KHARIWALA, SARAH " 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 289023 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 360013 61712012 126953 KIMM, RYAN 150.00 FARMERS MARKET 6/14/12 289146 053012 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 360014 61712012 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 336.00 APR/MAY- SERVICE 289080 053012 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 336.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 360021 6/712012 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID Council Check Register 40.00 GASOLINE - 288985 6/7/2012 - 6/7/2012 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No, Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360015 617/2012 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 360022 61712012 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 294.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 288823 1571S 05524.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2123311 1553.6530 167.00 288824 1570S 05524.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 794.00 288825 1676S 05524.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 895.00 241.00 288826 1582S 05523.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 673.00 00001346 288827 1586S 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,169.00 360016 61712012 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 125.93 LOGO UNIFORMS 289189 11520131 5720.6201 LAUNDRY 48.50- RETURN 289245 11543446 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 77.43 360017 617/2012 116260 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC. 195.58 TARGETS 288983 0193114 -IN 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 195.58 360018 6/712012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 187.25 WIRE, WASHERS; CLAMPS 00005265 288828 9300851042 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 187.25 360019 61712012 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page - 16 ;.., Business Unit VALLEY ESTATES VALLEY ESTATES VALLEY ESTATES VIKING HILLS WELL HOUSES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.00 288913 311029 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 140.00 289270 22272 58.62.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 280.00 360020 61712012 130316 CINDER'S 300.82 FLOWERS FOR EDINBOROUGH PK 00002146 288984 CUST 1100000 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 300.82 360021 6/712012 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 40.00 GASOLINE - 288985 053012 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 210.20 EXPENDITURES- TASK FORCE 288985 053012- 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES " 250.20 360022 61712012 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 112.10 BALL VALVE 00005217 288829 2123311 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 112.10 360023 617/2012 130331 MAMBE BLANKET COMPANY 895.00 LIFEGUARD BLANKETS 289190 15298 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN,, POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 616/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 17 617/2012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 895.00 360024 61712012 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 432.84 PHONE CHANGES 289320 65385 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON OCCUPANCY 264.52 PHONE CHANGES 289321 65677 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,196.18 PHONE LINE AUDIT 289322 66082 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 4,893.54 360025 61712012 123106 MAUDE- GRIFFIN, SARAH 69.00 CLASS REFUND 193906 081308 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 69.00 360026 6/712012 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 3,806.25 FACILITY SCHEDULING SOFTWARE 288830 12982 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 3,625.00 MEMBERSHIP CARDS 00004358 289191 12981 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 7,431.25 360027 61712012 102197 MCFOA 40.00 JANE TIMM 288986 DUES - 2012 1180.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ELECTION 40.00 DEBRA MANGEN 288986 DUES - 2012 1180.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ELECTION 80.00 360026 61712012 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 64.75 OWATONNA TRIP 289081 ADDITIONAL 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS PERSON 64.75 2ND ADDITIONAL PERSON 289082 OWATONNA 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 129.50 360029 61712012 101483 MENARDS 323.69 TOOLS, FILTERS, TAPE 00001302 288831 65985 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 64.02 STAPLES 00001403 289147 70478 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 228.54 HAND TOOLS 00001369 289148 71065 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 127.04 FLANGES, POSTS 00001230 289149 58636 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.67- RETURN 289150 59118 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 27.00 NAILS, UTILITY KNIFE 00001233 289151 59127 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 16.64 LOTION 00001390 289152 67124 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.38 UTILITY KNIVES, BLADES 00001306 289153 66547 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 121.46 NAILS, KNEEPADS 00001282 289154 61512 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 934.10 360030 61712012 130324 MENSAH, ERIC 50.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 289083 053012 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 18 677/2012 — 6(7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 360031 6/712012 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 2,468.81 SOCCER GOALS 00001379 288832 141371 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 239.19 FIELD PAINT 00001377 289155 141481 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 2,708.00 360032 617/2012 100885 METRO SALES INC 1,829.00 COPIER USAGE 289192 460647 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,829.00 360033 61712012 130323 METZ, ERIN A 16.67 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 289084 6500 RIDGEVIEW 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DR 16.67 360034 61712012 104650 MICRO CENTER 534.37 HP LAPTOP 00003023 288987 3903925 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 534.37 360035 61712012 122473 MILLER, CHICHI 32.83 ART WORK SOLD 289024 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 32.83 360036 6/7/2012 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 128.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289101 052912 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 128.21 J 360037 617/2012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1 1,102.50 CURBSTOP REPAIR 00001343 288833 14089 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,102.50 360038 677/2012 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 18,734.91 WATER PURCHASE 431 - 0005.300 289323 060412 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 18,734.91 360039 6/712012 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 104.96 PRESSURE SWITCH 00001296 288834 1285625-00 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 671.90 MOTOR, WHEELS, HOUSING 00005998 288835 1285947 -00 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ' WELL HOUSES 135.16 REFRIGERANT 00001296 288836 1285635 -00 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 912.02 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 616/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/7/2012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger. Account Description Business Unit 360040 61712012 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,095.00- CONNECTION FEE 288837 052312 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22,095.00 360041 61712012 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 25.00 HANDICAPS 289193 45-0150 -21 -5/12 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 396.00 289194 45- 0150 -13 -5/12 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 4,884.00 289195 45- 0150 -16 -5/12 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 5,305.00 360042 6/712012 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE '& EQUIPMENT 2,508.23 HYDRANT COUPLINGS 00001709 288838 0279631 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,508.23 360043 61712012 101559 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS 45.00 MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION (3) 289197 19 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 45.00 360044 61712012 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 162.90 NEIGHBORHOOD POSTCARDS 288839 11273 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 59.03 POSTERS 289196 11377 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION 221.93 360045 61712012 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS 40.00 REI PERMIT 289085 4 PLEX OUTLET 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 40.00 360046 61712012 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 952.75 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289136 060112 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 952.75 360047 6/7/2012 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 450.00 BATTERIES 00003803 289198 13882857 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 450.00 360048 61712012 100906 MTi DISTRIBUTING INC. 77.74 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001356 288840 845639 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 709.91 SOLENOID, IRRIGATION HEADS 00002030 289156 845740 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 292.17 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001368 289157 846082 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 172.92 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001272 289158 845556 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 1,252.74 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 61712012 — 6/7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360049 6/7/2012 121233 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT 152.32 PERMIT REFUND 289086 ED108907 1470.4162 152.32 360050 6/7/2012 104078 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 3,241.00 CITY OF EDINA MEMBERSHIP 289087 MAYOR HOVLAND 1120.6105 3,241.00 360051 617/2012 104350 NIKE USA INC. 1,005.19 ., STAFF UNIFORMS 289159 941369043 5760.6406 1,005.19 360052 61712012 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 114.57 ALUMINUM CHANNEL 00005216 288988 233198 1553.6530 648.53 CHANNEL 00005218 288989 233199 1553.6530 763.10 360053 61712012 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 1,200.00 SOFTWARE INSTALLATION 00003107 288990 IN35846 1400.6406 1,200.00 - 360054 61712012 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHICSUPPLY•CO. 503.23 SIGNET BRISTLES 00009154 288991 42354700 5120:5510 45.25 PAINTING PADS 00009154 289199. 42354701 5120.5510 548.48 360055 61712012 130333 O- MALLEY, MARY ANNE 48.75 ART WORK SOLD 289220 052912 5101.4413 48.75 360056 61712012 130298 OAKS ELECTRIC COMPANY 150.00 LIGHT POLE REPAIRS 288841 1471 5720.6180 150.00 360057 61712012 116114 OCE 176.72 MAY 2012 MAINTENANCE 289324 987731487 1495.6103 176.72 360058 617/2012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 80.07 COIN TRAY, TONER 288842 609927480001 .5710.6513 186.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00006034 289088 1470130149 5410.6513 266.18 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page - 20 Subledger Account Description Business Unit ALARM PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 6/712012 - 6/7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier l Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360059 61712012 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 262.44 WIRE ROPE 00007108 289200 685016 5311.6406 262.44 360060 61712012 123786 OLSON, VICKI = 31.85 ART WORK SOLD 289025 052912 5101.4413 31.85 360061 61712012 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 515.00 PLAY STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE 289201 2277 5720.6530 515.00 360062 61712012 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 308.02 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289160 053112 1644.6107 308.02 360063 61712012 116603. PARKER, KATHLEEN 61.43 ART WORK SOLD 289026 052912 5101.4413 61.43 360064 61712012 102440 PASS, GRACE 114.40 ART WORK SOLD 289027 052912 5101.4413 114.40 360065 6/712012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,153.51 288914 8351919AN 5862.5513 1,710.77 288915 8351896 -IN 5842.5513 402.75 289271 8351923 -IN 5822.5513 673.76 289272 8351926 -IN 5822.5513 3,940.79 360066 61712012 100945. PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 2,073.86 289089 31267510 5421.5510 1,569.57 289202 75329601 5320.5510 28.80 289273 73227728 5822.5515 304.50 289274 73227738 5862.5515 3,976.73 360067 61712012 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC 475.00 POSTER DESIGN 288992 052412 1130.6103 475.00 Subledger Account Description -_ GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page - 21 Business Unit POOL OPERATION ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE ART WORK SOLD ART WORK SOLD' ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GRILL POOL CONCESSIONS 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6/7/2012 - 6/7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360068 61712012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE &SPIRITS 787.72 288916 2245044 5822.5513 1,024.98 288917 2245042 5822.5513 30.12 288918 2245988 ,. 5862.5513 287.66 288919 2245985 5862.5513 340.75 289119. 2248575 5842.5512 2,982.26. 289120 2248576 5842.5513 1,588.37 289121 2248570 5842.5513- 1,286.54 289122 2248574 5842.5513 89.92 289281 2248572 5822.5512 118.65 289282 2248573 5822.5513 824.21 289283 2248569 5822.5513 854.82 269284 2248577 5862.5513 317.58 289285 2248571 5862.5513 2,782.93 289286 2248579 5862.5513 290.03 289287 2248578 5862.5512 13,606.54 360069 61712012 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 24,266.05 2012 CHEV SILVERADO . 00006137 289312 CF221384 5400.1740 24,266.05 360070 6/712012 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 605.00 BRM PERMIT 96171002 288843 BRM -2012 1550.6235 605.00 360071 617/2012 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 1,374.28 LOADER REPAIRS 00005318 288844 21745 1553.6180 1,117.13 BOOM FRAME REPAIR 00005317 288845 21746 1553.6180 2,491.41 360072 • 61712012 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 437.50 NITRLE GLOVES 288993 48076 1400.6406 437.50 360073 6/7/2012 118640 PRO TURF 13.39 SPRINKLER REPAIR 288847 7058 01334.1705.21 13.39 360074 617/2012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 231.81 GLASS CLEANER, LINERS 00002145 288846 5626 5720.6511 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page - 22 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET POSTAGE CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING INSPECTION CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION•GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 23 6/7/2012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 231.81 360075 61712012 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 978.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289139 060112 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 978.50 360076 6/7/2012 130326 RHODES, JEFF 92.00 SUMMER CLASS REFUND 289100 053112 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 92.00 360077 61712012 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING_ COMPANY ,304.04 DRINKING FOUNTAIN REPAIR 00006010 289090 59498 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 304.04 360078 61712012 130318 ROBINSON STEEL COMPANY INC. 304.40 KEYS, DEAD BOLTS 00003024 288994 8307 -EBIZ 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 304.40 360079 61712012 100982 ROTO- ROOTER 784.00 JETTING OF DRAINS 00002020 289161 22616684642 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 784.00 360080 61712012 101682 . S & S WORLDWIDE INC. 674.62 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM SUPPLIES0007117 288995 7332853 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND.& THEATER 674.62 360081 61712012 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 44.30 BAKERY 289203 344263 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 44.30 360082 61712012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 23.88 10V -9350 00006008 288848 PICNIC DILLS 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 23.88 360083 61712012 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 42.25 ART WORK SOLD 289028 052912 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 42.25 360084 61712012 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 38.96 FRAMING WOOD 00001334 288849 41019925 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 268.63 LUMBER 00001215 289162 41014886 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 51.71 PLYWOOD FOR SIGNS 289204 41019072 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/7/2012 — 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO.# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 359.30 - 360085 6/712012 119799 SCHIMET7, SCOTT 309.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289137 060112 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 309.00 360086 61712012 127490 SCULLY. PAT - 27.63 ART WORK SOLD 289221 053112 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 27.63 360087 61712012 100995 SEH 3,012.94 RECON PROJ 288850 256249 01334.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 4,387.13 GOLF TERR SWALES PLAN 288851 255669 04350.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN STS -350 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD 111.38 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 07047.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN W 42ND ST SIDEWALK 453.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 01397.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LAKE EDINA A 453.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 01396.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BRAEMAR HILLS C 899.34 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 48017.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN SA17 SOUNDWALL TH 100 806.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 01395.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BRAEMAR HILLS B 1,003.72 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,887.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 01386.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD 2,034.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 01387.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD 2,150.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 05499.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-499 RAW WATER_ WELL2 TO WTP6 2,477.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 .255666 01388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 4,471.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES 288852 255666 01385.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD 5,434.07 RICHMOND HILLS PARK PROJ 288996 256250 03471.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 6,393.02 RICHMOND HILLS PARK.PROJ ` 288996 256250 05525.1705.20,: CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 7,991.28 RICHMOND HILLS PARK PROJ 288996 256250 04387.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 12,146.74 RICHMOND HILLS PARK PROJ 288996 256250 01388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN RICHMOND HILLS PK 56,213.62 360088 61712012 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA. 53.30 ART WORK SOLD 289222 053112 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 53.30 360089 61712012 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 69.57 PAINT THINNER 00001287 288997 6591 -8 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 69.57 360090 61712012 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 338.45 STAFF UNIFORMS 289205 461042 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION. 17.00 289206 461041 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 435.45 289207 461040 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 360091 6/712012 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/7/2012 -6M20`12 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 790.90 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Business Unit 616/2012 9:42:45 Page - 25 168.50 288920 1804464 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 2,089.10 288921 1780044 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 632.62 288922 1804501 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,374.50 288923 1780062 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 912.00 288924 1804507 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 345.20 288925 1780047 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,510.83 269123 1780061 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 732.20 289288 1806848 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 567.84 289289 1806842 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 511.47 289290 1777153 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,581.79 289291 1806843 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 583.00 269292 1804500 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 777.00 289293 1780060 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,251.54 289294 1806850 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 15,037.59 360092 6/712012 103273 SOUTHSIDE BIG BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/11/12 289094 050612 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 360093 617/2012 110977. SOW, ADAMA 78.00 ART WORK SOLD 289223 053112 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 360094 61712012 102698 SPOONER, AN_ NE 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 289224 053112 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 360095 6/7/2012 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 2,000.00 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 288853 1204 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,000.00 . 360096 617/2012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 60.68 PLUMBING PART 00001244 288998 52544714.002 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.68 PLUMBING PART 00001289 288999 S2546081.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 133.32 SOLENOID ASSEMBLY 00001121 289000 S2537175.002 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 254.68 360097 61712012 129745 ST LOUIS PARK 00 GRILL AND CHI R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 26 6/7/2012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description- Business Unit 127.94 CAKES 288854 581 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 127.94 360098 6/712012 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 84.24 K2 KEYS 00002005 289163 902036336 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 84.24 360099 61712012- 129409 STEEN, BARB 44.20 ART WOKR SOLD 289225 053112 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 44.20 360100 61712012 130334 STEVEMER, BOB 26.33 ART WORK SOLD 289226 053112 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.33 i 360101 61712012 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 300.00 EDINBOROUGH PK AD 288855 1377261 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 119.90 AD FOR BID 289164 1378383 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 74.94 PUBLISH ORD 850 -A -37 289165 - 1379530 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 155.87 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -9 289166 1379528 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 83.93 PUBLISH VACATION NOTICE 289167 1379529 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 53.96 JUNE 13 PHN 289325 1380683 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 788.60 360102 61712012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 896.00 288926 002184 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 537.00 289295 002342 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,433.00 360103 61712012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 757.54 MERCHANDISE 289237 18090854 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 165.62 289238 18090852 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 129.36 289239 18090853 6440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 105.60 289240 18097570 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 89.60 289241 18119672 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 102.88 289242 18107920 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP. RETAIL SALES 1,350.60 360104 617/2012 120325 TCC MATERIALS 292.01 MORTAR 00001333 288856 0000566226 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 292.01 - R56CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 617/2012 - 61712012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360105 6/7/2012 118133 TCIC INC. 321.83 RADIO SYSTEM CHECK 00001194 288857 87098 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1652.6107 - MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 5311.6180 5311.6180 5421.5510 5421.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5514 5421.5514 5862.5514 5421.5513 5862.5515 1470.6104 5862.6122 5822.6122 5842.6122 5440.5511 5440.5511 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD.. BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF-GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER 616/2012 9:42:45 Page - 27 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION PLANNING WEED MOWING POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING GRILL VERNON SELLING GRILL VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 321.83 360106 61712012 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 104.34 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289002 052812 104.34 360107 61712012 121253 THAYER, LARRY 125.43 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289003 052512 125.43 360108 61712012 130301 THEMEDESIGN INC 8,700.00 REPAIRS TO AQUATIC.CTR_ THEMES 288858 ED- 2012 -02 13,150.00 SHIPWRECK REPAIR 00007095 289216 ED- 2012 -01 21,850.00 360109 6/712012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 140.00 288859 692180 262.80 288860 692181 150.00 288861 691797 604.00 288862 00773037 308.25 288927 692070 136.00, 289091 00773092 2,339.45 289124 692830 135.50 289208 693244 33.50 289296 692831 4,109.50 360110 6/712012 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 750.00 FITNESS TRAINING 289209 INV465 750.00 360111 61712012 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 291.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 288863 .2012 -70918 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 288863 . 2012 -70918 291.67 - MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 288863 2012 -70918 875.00 360112 617/2012 101474 TITLEIST 2,341.38 GOLF BALLS 289243 0625429 322.69 289244 0645011 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1652.6107 - MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 5311.6180 5311.6180 5421.5510 5421.5514 5421.5514 5421.5514 5862.5514 5421.5514 5862.5514 5421.5513 5862.5515 1470.6104 5862.6122 5822.6122 5842.6122 5440.5511 5440.5511 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD.. BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF-GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER 616/2012 9:42:45 Page - 27 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION PLANNING WEED MOWING POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING GRILL VERNON SELLING GRILL VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/612012 _ 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 28 61712012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount _ Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,664.07 360113 617/2012 101037 TONONEN PAINTING 10,269.00 PAINTING AT AQUATIC CENTER 289210 052112 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 10,269.00 360114 6/7/2012 103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 289227 053112 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 360115 6/712012 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 90.85 LAWN WEED CONTROL 289211 117150 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 90.85 -- 360116 61712012 119479 VALLEY VIEW GLASS & SCREEN 690.00 DOORS, SHELVES, MIRRORS 00001413 289168 050712 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 690.00 360117 6/712012 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 490.80 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 288864 236412 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 240.89 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 288865 237052 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 507.72 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 000013%289004 237022 =00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 31.33 SOAP 289212 236132 -01 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 1,270.74 360118 617/2012 101064 VESSCOINC. 1,711.49 REPAIR VACUUM REGULATOR 00007120 288866 54142 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,711.49 360119 617/2012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 275.13 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001804 288867 6194519 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,098.31 CONDUIT, COUPLINGS 00001309 288868 6375282 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 566.05 BREAKERS 00001279 288869 6369883 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 82.73 PUNCH 00001402 289005 6385393 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 116.79 CABLE SPLICES 00001291 289169 6353280 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,139.01 360120 617/2012 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 199.69 LOCKS 00001239 289006 297982 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 128.14 SUNSCREEN, REPELLENT 00001384 288007 298076 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 327.83 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 617/2012 - 617/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360121 61712012 129433 VILLAS, DAN 35.00 SOFTBALL WINNER 268918 080811 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/612012 9:42:45 Page - 29 Business-Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES TREES, FLOWERS,SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CONSULTING DESIGN P21 50TH&FRANCE CENTER RAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 35.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 360122 6/7/2012 50TH ST SELLING 119464 VINOCOPIA 561.33 288928 0057189 -IN 5822.5513 561.33 360123 61712012 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 802.62 LIGHT FIXTURE 00001596 289170 15203725 -00 1322.6530 802.62 360124 61712012 124365 WADSWORTH, JIM 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 289228 053112 5101.4413 19.50 360125 61712012 102886 WAGNERS 206.88 FLOWERS FOR EDINBOROUGH PK 00002148 288870 1 -1313 5720.6620 206.88 360126 61712012 102542 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC 70,565.83 FEASIBILITY STUDY 289008 21380800004 44008.1705.20 70,565.83 360127 6/712012 120725 WARNERS STELLIAN 834.58 DISHWASHER - STATION 2 00003758 289217 0509206YQPH 1470.6406 834.58 360128 61712012 124502 WEST IRRIGATION SERVICES . 429.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 288871 4515 W 70TH ST 01367.1705.21 429.00 360129 61712012 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 175.94 MARCH MILEAGE 289092 053112 1190.6107 175.94 360130 61712012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 433.90 288929 300233 -00 5822.5513 1,108.93 288930 300848 -00 5842.5513 8.00- 288931 268785 -00 5842.5513 148.20 289125 300842 -00 5862.5513 444.25 289297 300847 -00 5822.5513 6/612012 9:42:45 Page - 29 Business-Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES TREES, FLOWERS,SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CONSULTING DESIGN P21 50TH&FRANCE CENTER RAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Council Check Register Page - 30 6M2012. -61712012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,682.00 289298 299612 -00 5822.5513 COST OF "GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,809.28 360131 6/712012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 744.51 288932 410404 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,697.92 288933 410601 5842.5513 COST OF.GOODS.SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 173.72 289126 411213 5842.5513 COST OF. GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,009.44 289127 411215 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 245.84 289126 411216 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 95.66 289299 411214 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,885.95 289300 411212 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,853.04 360132 6/7/2012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 5,050.34 288934 751464 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,110.99 288935 750624 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 646.74 288936 748912 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH.ST SELLING 1,834.82 288937 750625 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34.11- 288938 859025 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING" - 165.40 289129 751463 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 213.75 289130 751322 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 188.62 289131 751472 5842:5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 172.30 289132 751474 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING: 147.30 289133 751476 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,380.40 289134 .751473 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.60 289301 751321 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING ' 146.20 289302 751468 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,858.79 289303 751467 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,266.00 289304 751469 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 339.55 289305 751466 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,669.07 289306 751462 5862.5512 COST-OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 25,160.76 360133 6!712012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 175.80 288939 903653 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 90.00 288940 903892 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,559.00 288941 904627 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 532.00 288942 903890 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,877.40 288943 903891 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 120.00 288944 903893 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 48.00 288945 903627 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 45.00 288946 903626 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/7/2012 - 6/7/2012 61612012 9:42:45 Page - 31 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,749.20 288947 903625 5822.5514, COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 233.60 289093 903612 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 501.00 269213 906620 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 107.50 289307 906855 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .03 289308 906853 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 289309 906852 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 289310 906851 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,266.15 289311 906854 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 15,304.74 360134 617/2012 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 679.00 70TH ST CONSTR 288872 19- 01686 -180 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 3,331.50 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 288873 19- 01686 -170 01383.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -383 W44TH ST 11,078.50 FRANCE AVE PED CROSSINGS 289009 1- 01686 -300 01404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 1,351.14 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 289010 6 -01686 -250 05526.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRACY AVE 2,509.26 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 289010 6- 01686 -250 03472.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRACY AVE 3,667.38 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 289010 6- 01686 -250 04388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRACY AVE 11,774.22 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 289010 6- 01686 -250 01368.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON 34,391.00 360136 61712012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 30,631.29 51- 4621797 -2 289034 326700796 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9.89 51- 6050184 -2 289035 326398855 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 79.38 51- 9608462 -5 289036 326452145 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER'" SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 17.14 51- 0193479 -4 289037 326311307 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 1,753.55 51- 9011854 -4 289038 326445588 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 49.83 51- 8976004 -9 289039 326442036 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 57.21 51- 4420190 -3 289040 326057133 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET. LIGHTING REGULAR 994.36 51- 5107681 -4 289041 326383491 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDGIMAINT 247.41 51- 6223269 -1 289042 326405948 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,417.82 51- 5547446 -1 289043 326716807 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 35.51 51- 8997917 -7 289044 326291095 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 17.50 51- 9770163 -6 289045 326301384 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 72.81 51- 97701647 289046 326297085 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.50 51- 0194596 -8 289047 326153237 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 6,648.89 51- 9603061 -0 289048 326450991 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 60.83 51- 6692497 -0 289049 326411245 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 22.89 51- 0160463 -1 289050 326152479 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 34.09 51- 0223133 -2 289051 326154347 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 81.80 51- 8526048 -8 289052 326279688 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 35.08 51- 65410842 289053 326253700 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 360140 6/712012 CITY OF EDINA 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 289370 060612 30.00 Council Check Register 130136 FADS, SUSAN 400.00 REGISTER FUND 289427 START UP 800.00 6!7/2012 — 6/7/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No ' Account No Subledger Account Description' 34.87 51 -6892224 -5 289054 326262088 .1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 308.11. 51- 8324712 -5 289055 326280771 1321:6185 LIGHT & POWER 883.35 51- 9251919 -0 289056 326780166 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER 35.61 51- 9422326 -6 - 289057 .326452437 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 35.67 51- 8102668 -0 289058 326759561 , 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 152.37 51- 8987646 -8 289059 326443366 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 133.01 51- 9337452 -8 289060 326448539 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,646.07 51- 4159265 -8 289061 326212692 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER 16,919.78 51- 4888627 -1 289246 327082425 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 63,451.62 360137 6/7/2012 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 6/6/2012 9:42:45 Page- 32 Business Unit STREET L16HTINGREGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PROMENADE EXPENSES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING.REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 74.50 288948 11101 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 74.50 360138 617/2012 101531 ZINN, BOBO 184.51 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 289029 052912 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 184.51 360139 6/7/2012 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6113/12 289097 050612 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 100.00 360140 6/712012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 289370 060612 30.00 360141 6/7/2012 130136 FADS, SUSAN 400.00 REGISTER FUND 289427 START UP 800.00 CHANGE FUND 289427 START UP 1,200.00 799,907.09 Grand Total 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5300.1040 CHANGE FUND 5300.1040 CHANGE FUND - Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 799,807.09 Total Payments 799,907.09 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 616/2012 9:43:51 Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/7/2012 - 6/7/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 149,271.74 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,195.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 170,879.33 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 329.83 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 3,376.33 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,371.75 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 247.41 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 113,951.09 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 51,668.71 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 23,953.40 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 5,295.22 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,076.17 05800 LIQUOR FUND 151,372.82 05900 UTILITY FUND 95,749.47 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 20,308.74 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,860.08 Report Totals 799,907.09 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects R55CKREG LOG20000 30.00 CITY OF EDINA 289643 060812 1550.6103 Council Check Register CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6/8/2012 - 6114/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360142 61812012 100613 AAA 611412012 1,622.34 PLATES FOR NEW VEHICLE 289642 060712 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 1,622.34 360143 6/812012 806.61 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 00001815 289371 6/1312012 7:57:03 Page- 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 289643 060812 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30.00 360144 611412012 108767 3D SPECIALTIES 806.61 SIGN POSTS 00001815 289371 438662 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 806.61 360145 611412012 100613 AAA 11.00 LICENSE TABS 289372 060412 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.00 360146 6/1412012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 99.60 289457 1576408 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 110.00 289458 1576409 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 153.20 289757 1577811 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 71.60 289758 1577806 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 434.40 360147 611412012 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 28.00 PEST CONTROL 289720 720512 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 28.00 360,148 6/14/2012 129530 AIAFS' 50.00 TRAINING CONFERENCE 289707 060712 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 360149 611412012 100058 . ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 39,958.20 RECYCLING 289818 2885942 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 39,958.20 360150 611412012 130322 AMBERGATE GARDENS 80.80 .FLOWERS FOR GOLF COURSE 00006210 289534 052212 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 80.80 360151 6114/2012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 196.06 MUFFLER, PIPE 00005225 289651 AFS- 221560004 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 196.06 `I R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360162 611412012 100665 AMSAN 142.38 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001366 269708 266749738 .1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE j 142.38 360153 6114/2012 100631 ANDERSON, TODD 321.81 REIMBURSE FOR GAS GRILL 289721 060612 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 321.81 360.154 611412012 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 871.52 FOOD 289535 1747837 5421.5510 COST OF-GOODS SOLD GRILL 871.52 360155 611412012 118061 ARAMARK 327.47 COFFEE 289652 1025340 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 327.47 360156 611412012 114475 .ARMOR SECURITY INC. 96.19 ALARM MONITORING 00001433 289326 162165 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 144.28 00001434 289327 162164 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE j 240.47 j 360157 611412012 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 211.56 1-146354 289653 6/01/12 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 211.56 360158 6114/2012 102573 ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING MANAG I 20.00 WORKSHOP - SOLVEI WILMOT 269751 JUNE 14 5952.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RECYCLING 20.00 360159. 611412012 102573 ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING MANAG 20.00 MEMBERSHIP - SOLVEI WILMOT 289752 001 -2012 5952.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS RECYCLING 20.00 360160 6/1412012 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I 475.59 SOLENOID 00005275 269373 151196 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 475.59 360161 6/1412012 124499 BACH, MARCIA 9.35 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289722 061112 1623.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TENNIS INSTRUCTION 93.01 TENNIS WORKSHOP 289722 061112 1623.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 102.36 360163 611412012 CITY OF EDINA 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 6/13/2012 7:57:03 R55CKREG LOG20000 675.18 JUNE 2012 LAWN CARE 289638 Council Check Register 7411.6136 Page - 3 675.18 6/812012 - 611412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360162 6114/2012 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 149.59 289459 86834700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 829.70 289460 73746300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 81.37 289461 86834800 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 387.10 289462 73746500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 32.89 289759 86874000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 73.15 289760 73746400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 8.81- 289761 86796500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 360163 611412012 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 675.18 JUNE 2012 LAWN CARE 289638 139322 7411.6136 675.18 360164 611412012 108670 BERNER, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/21/12 289649 060112 5760.6136 150.00 360165 611412012 126139 BERNICK'S WINE 616.00 289463 11322 5842.5514 224.40 289464 11323 5842.5513 840.40 360166 6114/2012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 342:21 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 289536 WO- 776744 -1 1600.4390.01 342.21 360167 611412012 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 412.54 COMPACTOR RENTAL 289654 709 4095.6103 412.54 360168 6114/2012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 59.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 289374 77612 1260.6406 130.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003807 289723 77723 1470.6406 190.39 360169 611412012 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 266.20 CANDY 289724 2340:031986 5421.5510 266.20 360170 611412012 103264 BRO -TEX INC. SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST -0F GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PLAYGROUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 50TH STREET RUBBISH ENGINEERING GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No 288.46 PIG MAT 00005276 289537 419017 1553.6530 5862.6575 5822.6575 5842.6575 1550.6103 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING 6/13/2012. 7:57:03 Page - 4 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5842.5514 288.46 YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 360171 611412012 5842.5515 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 176.26 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 289538 28143 01367.1705.21 176.27 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 289538 _ 28143 BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 176.27 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 289538 28143 TELEPHONE 528.80 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 360172 611412012 TELEPHONE 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 1628.6188 TELEPHONE 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 289835 061112 5841.6188 30.00 YORK OCCUPANCY 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 360173 6/1412012 1622.6188 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES SKATING & HOCKEY 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 2,987.37 1646.6188 289465 104154 5932.6188 4,040.70 GENERAL STORM SEWER 289466 105389 98.10 289467 105390 1,197.34 289468 105387 963.05 289762 107283 9,286.56 360174 611412012 112811 CASTREJON INC. 3,328.00 INSTALL FIBER OPTIC CABLE 289539 11227 1,020.00 FIBER OPTIC REPAIR 289540 11228 4,348.00 360175 611412012 129923 CAWLEY 793.45 NAME BADGES 289328 V101657 793.45 360176 611412012 123898 CENTURYLINK 55.86 952929-0297 289329 0297 -5/12 314.28 952 927 -8861 289330 8861 -5112 56.10 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 58.80 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 117.67 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 121.49 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 140.56 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 166.56 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 170.23 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 235.46 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5112 267.13 612 Z28 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 5862.6575 5822.6575 5842.6575 1550.6103 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING 6/13/2012. 7:57:03 Page - 4 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKREG LOG20000 REPAIR PARTS. 3,718.20 CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 360177 Council Check Register 1553.6530 117187- CHEM SYSTEMS LTD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5760.6136 618/2012 - 6/14/2012 CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,766.56 612728 -0146 289331 0146 -5/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 107.62 952 826 -7398 289541 7398 -5/12 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 83.78 952 941 -1019 289542 1019 -5/12 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 56.10 952920 -8632 289656 8632 -5/12 5913.6188 TELEPHONE 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 6/1312012 7:57:03 Page- 5 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION ARENA ICE MAINT STORM LIFT STATION MAINT ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS. 3,718.20 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 360177 6114/2012 1553.6530 117187- CHEM SYSTEMS LTD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL- SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1646.6406 1,495:34 TOWER TREATMENT 1552.6406 289375 517068 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,495.34 360178 6/14/2012 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD' 486.11 % XCEL FOR STORM LS 00001350 289376 5204 486.11 360179 611412012 105693 CITYSPRINT 14.64 COURIER SERVICE 289332 26064 14.64 360180 6/1412012 120433 COMCAST 96.12 8772 10 614 0177449 289543 177449 -5/12 90.44 8772 10 6140164959 289544 164959 -5/12 186.56 360181 6/1412012 128726 COTE, DARREL 502.25 TRAINING EXPENSE 269377 MILEAGE 502.25 360182 6/1412012 100701 .CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 294.33 TIRES, RIM, VALVE STEM 00001351 289378 157269 593.75 STARTER 00005259 289545 157312 593.75- CREDIT FOR INV 157312 289819 2538 518.18 STARTER 00005259 289820 157336 812.51 360183 611412012 120535 DAKOTA WILD ANIMALS LLC 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/19/12 289647 060112 150.00 360184 611412012 104020 DALCO 505.99 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001385 289333 2468089 5,905.40 FLOOR SCRUBBER 00001193 289379 2468729 208.62 LPS #2 00005258 289380 2465625 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 6/1312012 7:57:03 Page- 5 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION ARENA ICE MAINT STORM LIFT STATION MAINT ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS. EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL- SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 149.70 SCRUBBER REPAIR . 6,769.71 Council Check Register 360185 611412012 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 121.35 DAIRY 121.35 209.19 - 360186 6/1412012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,389.60 Account No 67.20 Business Unit 5,493.95 2470343 44:80 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,186.10 289546 19.20 5421.5510 360187 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:63 Council Check Register Page - 6 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 209.19 - - TORX SET, SOCKETS 00005219 289381 PO #, -" Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 00005320 •289657 2470343 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 289546 052812 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 289469. 652762 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 289470 652763 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD-MIX. YORK SELLING" 289471 653766 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 289472 653767 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 289473 653764 5822.5514 COST -OF GOODS SOLD�BEER 50TH ST SELLING 289474 653765 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD,MIX 50TH ST SELLING 289763 653762 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 289764 653763 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 360187 611412012 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 209.19 - - TORX SET, SOCKETS 00005219 289381 695975 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 209.19 360188 611412012 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 123.41 BAKERY 289547 414065 5421.5510 COST.OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 49.37 289548 414066 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 34.18 289725 414444 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 37.56 289726 414537 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 244.52 360189 611412012 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 265575 062711 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 360190 611412012 100730 DORSEY& WHITNEY LLP 6,333.50 SOUTHDALE REDEVELOPMENT 289727 1802171 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 6,333.50 360191 611412012 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 103.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 269702 060712 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 103.00 360192 611412012 101656 EDINA CHORALE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Page - 7 6/8/2012 — 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/18/12 289645 060112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 100.00 360193 611412012 130349 EDINA CITY CLERK 500.00 COMPLIANCE FINE 289658 060812 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 500.00 360194 611412012 129965 EDINA COREPOWER YOGA AND SPA 80.00 FITNESS TRAINING 289728 060412 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 360195 6114/2012 101596 EDINA HOCKEY-ASSOCIATION 1,614.13 CONCESSION INVENTORY 289382 060412 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,614.13 360196 611412012 103594 EDINALARM INC. 436.05 ALARM MONITORING 289549 73682 5422.6250 ALARM SERVICE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 436.05 360197 6114/2012 118010 EGAN, BILL 224.95 MUSKRAT CONTROL 00006485 289550 052412 5431.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 224.95 360198 6114/2012 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 126.42 MANAGEMENT FEE 289836 MAY 2012 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 126.42 360199 611412012 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 1,741.48 REPAIR MOTOR 00001332 289383 394643 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,741.48 360200 611412012 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 496.06 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003730 289729 1465565 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3.57 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003730 289730 1466308 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 499.63 360201 6114/2012 127590, ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 84.56 MINI BULBS, WIRE 00005163 289659 183686 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.56 360202 611412012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 222.33 BEARINGS 00005237 289384 1- 3904597 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 611412012 130341 GALLIGAN, SHEILA CITY OF EDINA 100.00 Council Check Register 289335 0110EDINA 1130.6103 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 222.33 BEARINGS 00005237 289385 69-067108 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 853813 268.75 FUEL MODULE, FILTER 00005237 289386 69-067278 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 400.18 SENDER & PUMP ASSEMBLY 00005237 289415 69- 067375 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 25.16 WIPER BLADES;, 00005237 289416 69- 067581 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 39617 115.17 SYNTHETIC OIL 00005237 289417 1- 3909671 1553.6584 _ LUBRICANTS 1,253.92 360210 611412012 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 360203 611412012 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 459.47 MERCHANIDSE 289553 40584428 39.85 HARDWARE 00001354 289334 MNTC2111878 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.85 360204 611412012 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 2,003.24 MTR ADAPTERS 00001468 289418 S01356463.004 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 317.63 METER COUPLINGS 00001468 289419 S01365858.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,320.87 360205 611412012 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 1,965.95 TURN -OUT GEAR 00003806 289731 7556 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 1,965.95 360206 6114/2012 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 164.80 ANNUAL INSPECTIONS 00001471 289420 0152628650 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 52.50 289421 0152628660 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 216.30 289422 0152628620 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 216.30 289423 0152628630 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 360207 611412012 130341 GALLIGAN, SHEILA 100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 289335 0110EDINA 1130.6103 100.00 360208 611412012 123080 GARDENVIEW GREENHOUSE . 229.78 WINDOW BOXES FOR FLOWERS 00006213 289551 853813 5422.6541 229.78 360209 6114/2012 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN 7,196.93 COMPRESSOR ROOM PUMP REPAIR 289552: 39617 5521.6180 7,196.93 360210 611412012 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 459.47 MERCHANIDSE 289553 40584428 5440.5511 459.47 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6113/2012 7:57:03 Page- 8 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE METER REPAIR METER REPAIR FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING COMMUNICATIONS PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE &..GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA 6113/2012 7:57:03 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 6/812012 - 6/1412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360211 6114/2012 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 235.60 FRYER REPAIR 289554 5385953 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 235.60 360212 611412012 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 15.19 PARTS 289660 053112 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 113.79 PARTS 289660 053112 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 375.82 PARTS 289660 053112 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,138.59 PARTS 289660 053112 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,643.39 360213 6/14/2012 103185 GERTENS 477.27 TREE DONATION 00001355 289555 253257 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 477.27 360214 6114/2012 102167 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRACTOR IN 88,350.00 AQUATIC CENTER SURF FEATURE 289732 APPL NO. 1 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 88,350.00 360215 6/14/2012 101103 GRAINGER 6.68 CLAMP 00001258 289336 9836276601 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.67 NITRILE GLOVES 00001258 289337 9836276593 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 146.21 GLOVES 00001339 289424 9835165847 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 5.24 ALCOHOL WIPES 00005315 289425 9836276619 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 119.52 PAPER PLATES, TISSUE 00005316 289426 9836609603 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5.06 SPRAYERS 00005319 289428 9837911768 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 86.16 HOSE REEL 00005220 289429 9839461325 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.84 TABLE GLIDES 289556 9832196845 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 1,391.25 289557 9806106382 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,391.25- 2.89558 9807479564 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 465.38 360216 611412012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 312.75 289475 140318 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 493.50 289603 140316 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 106.25 289604 140317 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 912.50 360217 6114/2012 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 804.27 CABLE FOR FOUNTAIN 00001396 289661 960490052 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 804.27 R55CKREG LOG20000 4,574.22, CHEMICALS 00005243 289430 3342251 CITY OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT -- 3,178.65 CHEMICALS 00005243 289431 3344010 Council Check Register WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,896.91 CHEMICALS 00005243 269432 3344786 6/8/2012 - 6/1412012 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES Check # Date Amount . Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360218 6/1412012 128230 GREENLEE, JORDON 32.17 CD /DVD BINDER 255418 020311 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 32.17 COUPLINGS. 00001347 289434 4884291 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 360219 611412012 530.06 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 360223 6114/2012 425.00 GOLF INSTRUCTION 289821 061112 - 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 425.00 BEEF PATTIES 289560 023911 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 289733 023922 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 360220 611412012 306.24 101255 HASLER INC. 360224 6/14/2012 323.61 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 00004009 289559 15645314: 1550.6235 POSTAGE .- 323.61 EMT REFRESHER COURSE 289662 25943 - 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 360221 6114/2012 790.00 100797 - HAWKINS INC. 6/1312012 7:57:03 Page - 10 Business Unit OLD COMMUNICATIONS ADAPTIVE RECREATION CENTRAL.SERVICES GENERAL 4,574.22, CHEMICALS 00005243 289430 3342251 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT -- 3,178.65 CHEMICALS 00005243 289431 3344010 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,896.91 CHEMICALS 00005243 269432 3344786 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 12,649.78 360222 611412012 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 474.01 CS KEY, COUPLINGS 00001335 289433 4848296 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 56.05 COUPLINGS. 00001347 289434 4884291 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 530.06 360223 6114/2012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 289560 023911 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 289733 023922 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 306.24 360224 6/14/2012 100802 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER .- 790.00 EMT REFRESHER COURSE 289662 25943 - 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 790.00 360225 611412012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 414.93 MAY 2012 BOOKINGS 289664 1000017212 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 414.93 360226 611412012 105436. HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 TIER 2 BUNDLED SERVICE 289663 1000017163 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 289753 1000017164 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 320.62 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 360227 611412012 100806 HOBART SERVICE 167.62 DISHWASHER REPAIR 167.62 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 618/2012 - 6/14/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 00006336 289734 30492310 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 360228 6/1412012 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.67 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 289476 603090 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,557.77 289477 603827 1,422.50 289765 603964 42.00 289766 604029 3,043.94 360229 6/14/2012 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND CONCERT BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6117112 289644 060112 100.00 360230 6/14/2012 122565 HYSER, TIMOTHY 180.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289703 060712 180.25 360231 611412012 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 450.57 MAIL LATE NOTICES 289338 63661 50.00 XCEL ENERGY INSERTS 289339 63649 50.00 RECYCLING INSERTS 289339 63649 3,307.14 MAIL UTILITY BILLS 289339 63649 3,857.71 360232 611412012 128034. INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIAT 51.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289822 497 51.50 360233 611412012 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 832.97 PROMENADE DESIGN MANUALS 289561 91817 1,339.87 COMP PLAN UPDATE MANUALS 289561 91817 2,172.84 360234 611412012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 56.35 289478 1786955 6,531.05 289479 1786954 2,123.80 289480 1786945 137.55 289605 1786998 13,071.30 289606 1786997 6,063.60 289767 1786988 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page - 11 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 4077.6103 5910.6103 1130.6103 5952.6406 5910.6103 4077.6103 01404.1705.20 01404.1705.20 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5862.5514 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) COMMUNICATIONS RECYCLING GENERAL (BILLING) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6113/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/8/2012 - 6/1412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339.15 289768 1823750 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 28,322.80 360235 6/1412012 124104' JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 103.59 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001360 289709 61459713 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 28.41 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001430 289710 61519323 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 132.00 360237 6/14/2012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS. LIQUOR CO. 5,289.02 289481 1308848 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 154.73 289482 1309369 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 399.24 289483 1309092 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,421.92 289607 1314444 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,033.52 289608 1314447 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 525.12 289609 1314449 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,691.71 289610 1314446 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,663.54 289611 1314448 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,249.49 289612 1314443 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.71- 289613 534836 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 29.77- 289614 533429 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 110.21 289769 1314433 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 31.37 289770 1314430 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,277.80 289771 1314428 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 63.47 289772 1314427 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 110.67 289773 1314423 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR .60TH ST SELLING .56 289774 1282819 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 445.57 289775 1314431 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.24 ' 289776 1314425- 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,185.50 289777 1314437 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,471.34 289778 1314436 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 773.32 289779 1314441 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 62.74 289780 1314438 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,517.02 289781 1314434 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,485.61 289782 _ 1314435 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,861.18 289783 1314439 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.98 289784 1314440 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 138.85 289785 1314442 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 54.41- 289786 533609 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 42.50- 289787 533430 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5.42- 289788 533608 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37,802.91 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360238 6/14/2012 102080 KATTREH, ANN 361.86 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 269755 JAN -FEB -MAR 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS CUSTOMER REFUND UNIFORM ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page - 13 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 11614[yX9l:4i NEC =1N4Z7d4 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION SENIOR TRIPS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SENIOR CITIZENS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 361.86 360239 6/14/2012 101502 KONTERS, VIKTORS 133.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289340 053112 1400.6107 133.20 360240 6/1412012 100845 KREMER SERVICES LLC 57.71 U -BOLT, WASHERS, NUTS 00005226 289435 18464 1553.6530 57.71 360241 611412012 130350 KURTZ, PAUL 60.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 289665 5516 FRANCE AVE 5900.2015 60.88 360242 6/1412012 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 63.50 LOGO CLOTHING 269666 11555776 1513.6203 63.50 360243 6114/2012 .127146 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC. 66.27 PLAYGROUND REPAIR PARTS 00001375 289711 C10737 1647.6530 678.00 PLAYGROUND REPAIR PARTS 00001448 289712 M99055 1647.6530 744.27 360244 611412012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. - 376.64 DRILL BITS, CLAMPS 00005314 289436 .9300860767 1553.6530 376.64 360245 611412012 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 30.00 TRAINING 289341 166677 1550.6104 30.00 ON -LINE COURSE 289667 166613 7410.6103 60.00 360246 6/1412012 130351 LITTLE, BARBARA 61.00 SR TRIP REFUND 289668 060512 1628.4392.07 61.00 360247 611412012 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 36.30 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289754 061112 1554.6107 36.30 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS CUSTOMER REFUND UNIFORM ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page - 13 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 11614[yX9l:4i NEC =1N4Z7d4 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION SENIOR TRIPS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SENIOR CITIZENS CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/8/2012 — 611412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360248 611412012 129969 M&A EXECUTIVE SEARCH LLC 5,250.00 CANDIDATE SOURCING 289735 156-B 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 5,250.00 360249 6114/2012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 687.00 289789 132719 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 687.00 360250 6114/2012 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 35.08 SANDWICH MOUNT 00001507 289437 2123351 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.08 360251 611412012 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 2,450.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATION 289736 7904 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,450.00 360252 6114/2012 101146 MATRIX , 257.59 289669 607963781 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 257.59 360253 6/1412012 105297 MAYER ELECTRIC CORP. 3,639.37 AIR HANDLER UNIT -FIRE ALARM 289439 100105 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 3,639.37 360254 6114/2012 125941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 1,440.00 INSPECTION CONTRACT 289438 ., 54084 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 1,440.00 360255 611412012 106326 MEDRANO, CHRIS 2,000.00 GOLF INSTRUCTION 289823 061112 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 2,000.00 360256 6/14/2012 101483 MENARDS 38.75 TIMBERS 00006205 289562 67288 5422.6577 LUMBER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 22.41- RETURN 00006205 289563 67318 5422.6577 LUMBER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 17.07 TIMBERS 00006205 289564 67322 5422.6577 LUMBER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 200.58 TIMBERS 00006203 289565 66563 5422.6577 LUMBER MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 85.61 BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 00001386 289713 74604 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 43.97 PAINT, BOWL CLEANER 00006012 289737 76147 5424.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 363.57 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/2012 — 6/1412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360257 6/14/2012 102281 MENARDS 56.84 SCREWS, CDX PANEL 00003029 289566 71750 1400.6104 56.84 360258 6114/2012 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 33.99 PLAYGROUND BALLS 289342 141584 4077.6406 683.52 TENNIS BALLS 289671 141687 1623.6406 717.51 360259 6114/2012 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 7,024.05 MAY 2012 SAC CHARGES 289567 060612 1495.4307 7,024.05 360260 611412012 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 353,674.67 SEWER SERVICE 289344 0000990864 5922.6302 353,674.67 360261 611412012 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 98.00 HAND SOAP 00001424 289440 SOI -002671 1552.6406 98.00 360262 6114/. 2012 100913 -. MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,715.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001473 289441 34091 5913.6180 1,715.00 360263 611412012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 735.00 STOPBOX REPAIR 00001472 289442 34092 5913.6180 735.00 360264 6/14/2012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 735.00 STANDPIPE REPLACEMENT 00001469 289443 34095 5913.6180 735.00 360265 6/14/2012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,102.50 INSTALL NEW STANDPIPE 00001470 289444 34096 5913.6180 1,102.50 360266 6/1412012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 3,000.00 SEWER REPAIR 00001053 289568 34085 03471.1705.21 3,000.00 360267 611412012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page - 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL' GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/2012 - 6/1412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,100.00 SEWER REPAIR 00001062 289569 34068 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2,000.00 WATER REPAIR 00001062 289569 34068 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,100.00 360268 611412012 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 111.00 MLS ACCESS FEE 289343 1702832 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 111.00 360269 6114/2012 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.34 WINDOW WASHING 289570 921098032 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 21.38 289571 921098030 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 16.09 289572 921098031 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 42.81 360270 611412012 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page- 16 Business Unit RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK ASSESSING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 140.00 FURNACE/AC PARTS 00001404. 289714 1287163-00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 42.96 00001409 289715 1287444-00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 66.75 00001409 289716 4076852 -00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 249.71 360271 611412012 117837 :'MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIAT 625.00 LINE LOCATING TRAINING 289674 (5) 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 625.00 360272 6/1412012 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 190.00 SPRAYER 00002027 289672 0094650 -IN 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 190.00 360273 6/1412012 102812 .MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 41.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT 289673 REI PERM 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 41.00 360274 611412012 126724 MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSN 2,520.00 SWAT CONFERENCE 289670 060712 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,520.00 360275 611412012 102395 MDSE, WILLIAM 180.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289704 060712 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 180.25 360276 611412012 100912 MOTOROLA INC. EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1,635.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT 289719 78201255 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page- 17 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,635.12 360277 611412012 102421 MPGMA 100.00 FALL MEETING 00006340 220504 090109 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 100.00 - 360278 611412012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 163.82 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001380 289345 846641 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 96.44 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001388 289346 847500 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 386.18 BEDKNIFE 00006215 289573 846576 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 646.08 GOVERNOR 00006219 289574 846786 -00 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 451.84 HYDRAULIC CYLINDER 00006208 289575 844658 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 331.06 VALVE SOLENOID 00006206 289576 844565 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 122.21 VALVE ASSEMBLY 00006206 289577 844565 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,197.63 360279 611412012 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 607.50 289484 74019, 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 741.00 289485 74021 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 169.50 289615 74020 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,518.00 360280 611412012 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL 129.00 BACKGROUND CHECK 289578 REIMBURSE 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 129.00 360281 611412012 130346 NIEMAN ROOFING COMPANY INC. 2,060.00 PRO SHOP ROOF REPAIR 00006479 289579 3547 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 2,060.00 360282 611412012 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 61.41 BULBS 00005175 289580 30638 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 61.41 360283 6114/2012 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 JUNE 2012 PSAP 289347 80696862 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 360284 6/14/2012 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 47.74 OIL 00001340 289445 685090 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 47.74 R55CKREG LOG20000 6114/2012 125492 PAYPAL INC. CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 39.95 MONTLY FEE 289348 17193669 Council Check Register Page - 18 360291 611412012 618/2012 - 6114/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account De_ scription Business Unit 360285 611412012 052212 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 507.74 360292 611412012 4,300.00 SEWER REPAIR 00001069 289581 2839 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 289582 4,300.00 922.75 00007072 289677 75329663 36028.6 611412012 441.71 130353 OWOSSO COMPOSITES LLC 289739 75329664 275.90 158.10 STAINLESS STEEL CRANKS 00002094 289675 220 5761.6530- REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 360293 158.10 124239 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC. 360287 6/14/2012 289349 129485 PAPCO INC. 20.00 61.17 TISSUE 289676 71706 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 61.17 360288 6114/2012 106631 PAULSON, DARLA J 66.72 SPRINKLER REPAIR 289824 060812 01373.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS RECON 66.72 360289 6/1412012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 118.25 289486 8352996 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,149.58 289487 8352944 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 289488 8352935 -IN 289489 8352942 -IN 360290 6114/2012 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 MONTLY FEE 289348 17193669 39.95 360291 611412012 130356 PELLINEN, ERIC 158.74 MMBA CONFERENCE 289738 052212 349.00 MMBA CONFERENCE 289738 052212 507.74 360292 611412012 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY ' 422.38 289582 75329651 922.75 00007072 289677 75329663 441.71 289739 75329664 275.90 289790 73572837 ' 2,062.74 360293 611412012 124239 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC. 20.00 NEW OFFICER EVALUATION 289349 99678 20.00 5842.5513 5822.5513 5910.6155 5820.6107 5820.6104 5421.5510 5761.5510 5430.5510 5842.5515 1400.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING BANK SERVICES CHARGES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH STREET GENERAL GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 6113/2012 7:57:03 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360294 6114/2012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 277.78 289490 2248735 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING ' 2,491.76 289616 2252518 5852:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,724.46 289617 2252519 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 804.98 289618 2252511 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 893.49 289619 2252520 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 92.35- 289620 3481842 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS,SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 43.07 289791 2252517 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,650.68 289792 2252515 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 307.71 289793 2252512 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2.24 289794 2234420 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 513.86 289795 225251D 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,057.34 289796 2252513 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.12 289797 2252514 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,031.62 289798 2252516 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.71- 289799 3481881 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 11,750.05 360295 611412012 100119 PING 140.79 GOLF CLUB 289583 11266311 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 140.79 360296 6114/2012 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 46.30 PEST CONTROL 289678 3150322 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.30 360297 611412012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 517.19 TIRES 00005127 289639 210002512 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES _ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 235.13- CREDIT 289825 210000423 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005127 289826 210001505 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,679.67 TIRES 00005238 289827 210003093 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 264.52 TIRES 00005238 289828 210003271 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 952.85 TIRES 00005238 289829 210004263 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005238 289830 210004610 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,389.10 360298 6114/2012 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS - 325.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 289679 061112 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 325.00 360299 6114/2012 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Page - 20 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET. CHEMICALS 6/8/2012 — 6/14/2012 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 72.00 BLADE SHARPENING 289446 259757 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET. CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS 72.00 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 360300 611412012 CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 6,957.29 EXTERIOR CAMERA ADDITIONS 00005979 289447 60133 1552.6530 6,957.29 360301 6/1412012 104455 PUPPE, RICHARD 154.99 TRAINING EXPENSES 289448 060412 1280.6104 154.99 360302 6114/2012 117692 R & 8 CLEANING INC. 2,030.63 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001423 289449 1134 4090.6406 2,030.63 360303 6/1412012 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 257.50•- SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289705 060712 4077.6103 257.50 360304 611412012 120036 RAMAKER & ASSOCIATES INC. 275.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 289350 17871 5300.1715 1,025.00 289351 17872 5300.1715 1,300.00 360305 611412012 125936 REINDERS INC. 270.87 INSECTICIDE 00006204 289584' 3014894-00 5422.6545 270.87 360306 611412012 130347 RELIABLE PROPERTY SERVICES 134.09 WEED CONTROL 289585 37594 5422.6275 134.09 WEED CONTROL 289586- 37593 5422.6275 268.18 360307 - 611412012 108659 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/20/12 289648 060112 5760.6136 100.00 360308 611412012 1 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/21112 289650 060112 5760.6136 200.00 360309 611412012 100988 SAFETY KLEEN REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET. CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00005327 289587 926754359 1553.6530 113.07 360310 6/14/2012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 23.74 101 = """9350 289740 WATER 1623.6406 23.74 360311 611412012 119799 SCHIMET7, SCOTT 103.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 289706 060712 4077.6103 103.00 360312 611412012 128052. SECAP 248.88 POSTAGE MACHINE INK 289588 81139221 1550.6235 248.88 360313 611412012 130047 SELECT'ACCOUNT 610.00 VEBA/HSA ADMIN 289831 889986 1550.6200 610.00 360314 611412012 103249 SHANNON, JIM 140.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/19/12 289646 060112 5760.6136 140.00 360316 611412012 103237 SHIRLEY,:TOM 128.87 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 289589 060612 5760.6107 128.87 360316 611412012 101000 SIR SPEEDY 156.57 BUSINESS CARDS 289352 72595 1550.6406 156.57 360317 6/14/2012 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 4,609.00 3RD QTR DUES 289640 8755 1470.6221 6,229.00 3RD QTR DUES 289640 8755 1400.6221 10,838.00 360319 611412012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,930.67 289491 1806847 5842.5512 356.50 289492 1776457 5842.5513 112.50 289493 1804566 5822.5513 73.83 289494 1776456 5862.5513 2,514.72 289495 1787603 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page- 21 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TENNIS INSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL - SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL RANGE RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RANGE RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS-SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit COST OF 60ODS.SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING ` •' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 6/8/2012 - 6/1412012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No YORK SELLING 602.00 VERNON SELLING 289496 1804568 5862.5513 VERNON SELLING 354.00 50TH ST SELLING 289497 1780063 5862.5513 50TH ST SELLING 1,933.88 EDINA MEANS BUSINESS AD 289498 1787604 5842.5513 ADVERTISING OTHER 603.00 EDINA MEANS BUSINESS AD 289499 1804567 5842:5513, ADVERTISING OTHER 120.50 289500 1804570 5842.5513 410.50 289621 1787602 5822.5513 4,946.71 289622 1806849 5842.5512 681.96 289623 1777160 5842.5512 367.99 289624 1806903 5842.5512 2,537.91 289625 1806902 5842.5512 147.45 289626 1806877 5842.5512 5,139.06 289627 1806904 5862.5512 282.40 289628 1806912 5862.5512 206.30 289629 1806876 5862.5512 1,588.40 289800 1806907 5822.5512 76.95 289801 1806916 5822.5512 1,591.39 289802 1806851 5822.5512 27,578.62 360320 6/1412012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 218.83 AIR VALVES 00001412 289450 S2554556.001 1552.6186 218.83 360321 611412012 101015 STREICHERS 416.80 AMMO 00003003 289680 1933025 1400.6551 42.98 SWAT UNIFORM 289681 1933937 1401.6203 48.02- CREDIT 289682 CM239026 1400.6203 126.11- CREDIT 289683 CM254505 1400.6203 58.77 289684 1932967 1400.6203 58.77- 289685 CM256410 1400.6203 285.65 6/1312012 7:57:03 Page - 22 Subledger AccounLDescription Business Unit COST OF 60ODS.SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF'GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ` •' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST;OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF.GOODS SOLD.LI000R YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COSfOF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODSZOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF, GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING HEAT AMMUNITION UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 360322 6/1412012 101017 • SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 525.29 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005324 289451 610659 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 525.29 360323 611412012 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 750.00 BUSINESS AD 289353 1379585 1130.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 150.00 EDINA MEANS BUSINESS AD 289590 1379584 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 150.00 EDINA MEANS BUSINESS AD 289590 1379584 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 150.00 EDINA MEANS BUSINESS AD 289590 1379584 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,200:00 CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Page - 23 618/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360324 611412012 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 255.31 FERTILIZER 289591 4984 -RGR 5431.6540 FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 255.31 360325 6114/2012 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 1,248.89 WEED CONTROL 00006207 289592 8008 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,248.89 360326 611412012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. - 705.00 289501 RT04- 000030 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 890.00 289502 002300 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,066.00 289803 002527 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,661.00 360327 611412012 130355 SUTTON & ASSOCIATES INC. 7,000.00 EDINA ART CENTER CONSULTING 289741 1ST INSTALLMENT 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION_ 7,000.00 360328 6/1412012 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 697.50 MOVIES IN THE PARK 289593 DB1692177 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 697.50 360329 611412012 111616. T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 289594 231494 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 40.00 360330 6114/2012 130357 TASC 191.00 MAR 2012 COBRA ADMIN 289742 IN101155 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 140.00 APR 2012 COBRA ADMIN 289743 IN103116 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 331.00 360331 611412012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 679.41 MERCHANDISE 289686 18131762 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 52.80 289687 18131761 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 163.86 289688 18131763 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 409.64 289689 18145232 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 388.08 289690 18145230 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 325.63 289691 18145231 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 55.86 289692 18151750 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 199.70 289693 18151751 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ' 182.40- 289694 18706216 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Pager 24 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,623.00- 289695 18701164 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,724.95 289696 18063584 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,724.95- 289697 18706289 5440.5511 COST,OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL, SALES 469.58 360332 611412012 113549 TENNIS WEST 3,125.00 INSTALL FENCE 00001449 289717 12 -00737 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 3,125.00 360333 611412012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 226.00 289595 00773150 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 481.80 289744 694593 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 122.20 289745 694592 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 52.65 289804 694156 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _ VERNON SELLING 2,576.11 289805 694154 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,458.76 360334 6/14/2012 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 157.50 VETERANS MEMORIAL MEETING 00007127'289354 19094 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 325.00 COUNCIL MINUTES 5115/12 289355 19093 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 482.50 360335 611412012 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 154.02 SEALS, BEARINGS 00005177 289452 9006352 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 267.28 TERMINALS, HARNESS 00005323 289453 9CO6368 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 154.67 BATTERY 00005180 289698- 9006475 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 575.97 360336 6/14/2012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 31.53 WELDING GAS 00001514 289596 442678 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.04 WELDING TANKS 289699 442679 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 73.57 360337 6114/2012 116535 TRAVELERS 6,805.00 DEDUCTIBLE, 289756 000411254 1550.6200 INSURANCE C ENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,805.00 360338 6/14/2012 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 112.22 WEED CONTROL 00001893 289718 117760 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 112.22 360339 6114/2012 130066 TRUSIGHT W R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Page - 25 61812012 — 6/14/2012 Check # Date _ Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10,012.50 JOB EVALUATION STUDY 289746 213989 4412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. COMP STUDY PROJECT 10,012.50 360340 6/14/2012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 153.14 STARTER 289597 0127686 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 153.14 360341 6/14/2012 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 587.81 SEED MIXTURE 289598 27744 5424.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT RANGE 587.81 360342 611412012 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 289747 060412 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 17.90 360343 6/1412012 101049 UHL COMPANY 942.50 HVAC REPAIR 00001303 289748 12613 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 942.50 360344 611412012 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 10.47 SHIPPING 289356 TRAN: 1309 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.47 360345 6/1412012 101908 US FOODS 186.76 CUST 43805514 289599 053112 5421.6511 CLEANING, SUPPLIES GRILL 526.38 CUST 43805514 289599 053112 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 4,931.89 CUST 43805514 289599 053112 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5,645.03 360346 611412012 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 129.57 LIQUOR BAGS 289700 237796 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 464.79 CUPS, TISSUE, TOWELS 289749 237848 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 594.36 360347 6114/2012 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 2,671.87 USED E -Z -GO VEHICLE 00002012 289641 49080 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,671.87 360348 611412012 100423 WACONIA FARM SUPPLY 64.45 BELT 00001256 289454 76016 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 64.45 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 360349 611412012 360350 611412012 360351 611412012 360352 6/1412012 360353 611412012 360355 6114/2012 Subledger Account Description ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER WEB DEVELOPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page - 26 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING COMMUNICATIONS YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 101312 WINE MERCHANTS CITY OF EDINA . Council Check Register 289632 412137 5862.5513 618/2012 - 6/14/2012 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No COST, OF GOODS SOLD WINE 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 728.96 289806 108.74 LOGO PENS 289600 50020 5862.6122 108.75 LOGO PENS 289600 50020 5822.6122 217.49 LOGO PENS 289600 50020 5842.6122 434.98 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.44 289809 127768 WIGLEY AND ASSOCIATES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 125.00 CITIZEN BLOGSITE 289701 0000071 1130.6124 125.00 VERNON SELLING 7,602.88 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 246.30 289503 301357 -00 5842.5513 456.40 159.24 289630 301358 -00 5822.5513 368.40 GENERAL SUPPLIES 289631 301490 -00 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER WEB DEVELOPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Page - 26 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING COMMUNICATIONS YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,891.13 289632 412137 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,632.32 289633 412139 5862.5513 COST, OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 728.96 289806 412138 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 'YORK SELLING 1,199.91 289807 412136 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 218.24 289808 406760 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.44 289809 407652 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 81.12- 289810 57670 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,602.88 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 WEB - JUNE 2012 289601 977 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.24 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 862.59 289504 753783 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,194.00 289505 751475 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,777.30 289506 751471 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,106.08 289507 751470 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 49.10 289508 755454 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX, YORK SELLING 4,703.41 289509 755453 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,827.69 289510 752686 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 87.69 289511 755452 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 295.38 289512 751077 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,515.57 289513 755451 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,582.92 289514 755446 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:03 Council Check Register Page - 27 6/8/2012 - 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 73.10 289515 755447 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,818.90 289516 751465 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.90 289517 751320 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,465.78 289518 753781 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 604.79 289519 755450 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 260.00- 289520 860987 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,477.47 289634 755444 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 172.30 289635 752684 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 39.63- 289636 859496 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 28.04 289637 859733 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 679.85 289811 755448 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10277 269812 755449 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 40,075.92 360356 6/1412012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 3,733.79 289521 906828 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 289522 906829 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,661.75 289523 907839 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 289524 907840 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 312.00 289525 907841 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 48.00 289526 906112 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,047.55 289527 906111 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 687.80 289813 909920 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 240.00 289814 907228 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,882.25 289815 907227 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,720.24 289816 910148 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 78.00 289817 910149 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18,540.38 360357 6/14/2012 122722 WOOLNER, SUZANNE 99.90 GOLF BAG CLIPS 00006013 289602 060412 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 99.90 360358 6/14/2012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,153.08 51- 6621207 -1 289357 327263812 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 955.31 51- 5847121 -5 289358 327251514 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 642.12 51- 90136046 289359 327297807 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 381.47 51- 5938955 -6 289360 326922611 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 801.28 51- 5634814 -2 289361 327090524 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 26.88 51- 4151897 -6 289362 327072195 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 350.59 51-6046826 -0 289363. 326925973 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 423.17 51- 6229265 -9 289364 327100135 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/2012 — 6/14/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,382.97 51- 6229265 -9 289364 327100135 1470.6185 28.85 51- 7567037 -0 289365 327115721 1321.6185 929.32 51- 6979948 -4 289366 327115145 5821.6185 1,146.14 51- 6979948 -4 289366 327115145 5861.6185 1,396.63 51- 6979948-4 289366 327115145 5841.6185 508.70 51- 6137136 -8 289367 327097222 5430.6185 5,886.43 51- 6824328 -7 289832 327802568 5420.6185 3,161.90 51- 6840050 -6 289833 327612913 5921.6185 6,814.45 51- 6121102 -5 289834 '327978456 1646.6185 26,989.29 360359 6114/2012 184.08 38.23 222.31 360360 611412012 12,584.00 6,336.40 18.920.40 360361 6114/2012 85.00 85.00 360362 611412012 462.50 462.50 949,044.15 100568 XEROX CORPORATION . MAY 2012 - PARK & REC 00004322 289368 061888075 MAY 2012 - BLDG /ENG 00004322 289369 061888074 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. DIESEL FUEL 00005975'289455 7/27/3248 FUEL 00005975 289456 492559 129844 YOGA CENTER OF MINNEAPOLIS FITNESS TRAINING 289750 060612 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 269528 11121 Grand Total 1550.6151 1550.6151 1553:6581 1553.6581 1470.6104 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL GASOLINE GASOLINE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 949,044.15 Total Payments 949,044.15 611312012 7:57:03 Page - 28 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/13/2012 7:57:55 Council Check Summary Page - 1 Company 01000 GENERALFUND 02200 DNU OLD COMMUNICATIONS FUND 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 05950 RECYCLING FUND 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 6/8/2012 - 6/1412012 Amount 122,071.90 32.17 20,547.55 7,029.25 89,650.00 28,214.30 15,669.00 6,570.59 218,807.13 397,250.41 1,610.57 40,048.20 1,543.08 Report Totals 949,044.15 0 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies nd re procedus e � 4 I _ _ i -KA. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV.C. From: Solvei Wilmot, Environmental Health Specialist I Recycling Coordinator Date June 19, 2012 Subject: Residential Curbside Recycling Contract Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: April 18, 2012 NA Company Bid or Quote Allied Waste Systems $412,000 annually RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Allied Waste Systems, 7 year contract, annual cost $412,000 GENERAL INFORMATION: The current residential curbside recycling collection contract expires, December 31, 2012. As a result, a Request For Proposals was developed. The final proposal rankings were determined using the best value method. Of the four companies, Allied Waste's was the top ranked. None of the proposals included weekly dual stream collection, only every other week single sort collection service was offered. At the City Council meeting May 15, 2012, staff was authorized to enter into contact negotiations with the top ranked company to reduce costs to the City. The negotiations resulted in: •e• Maintaining 100% revenue share after processing of the recyclable materials •o• Providing the lowest per household pick up cost compared to the other proposers •e• Decreasing the processing fee for the recyclables, ❖ Increasing the market indices which the revenue share would be based upon from low side averages to high side averages •o• Adding four $500 Edina High student scholarships. A total of $2,000 annually. •e• Starting the single sort contract October 1, 2012 which results in: 9 An increase in revenue share from 60% (current contract rate) to 100% 9 Reduced per household cost from $2.81 to $2.40 saving approximately $18,000 •o• Adding direct mailing cost for an annual recycling publication to residents saving approximately $5,000. Page 2 Agenda Item No. IV.C. Residential Curbside Recycling Contract The total negotiated changes result in over $100,000 in benefits to the City. The contract has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Police i ature D �artment The Recommended Bid is Finance Director within budget not within b John Wallin, Z- L----"Y'§eott H.Neal, y ger Attachments: pdf Single Stream Residential Curbside Recycling Collection Agreement r 8 SINGLE STREAM RESII)ENTIAL CIURESIDE RECYCLING COLLECTION AGREEMENT AGREEMENT dated 2012, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, d/b /a Allied Waste Services of the Twin Cities, Eden Prairie (the "Contractor"). RECITALS A. The Contractor desires to provide single stream recycling collection services to residents of the City of Edina. B. The City desires to provide these services for the health, safety and welfare of its residents. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. Addendum A to the City of Edina Request for Proposals (RFP) for Residential Curbside Recycling Services dated April 11, 2012. C. Request for Proposals (RFP) for Residential Curbside Recycling Services March 13, 2012. D. Contractor's Proposal for the City of Edina, MN for Residential Curbside Recycling Services In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document "A" having the first priority and Contract Document "D" having the last priority. 7057982.1 1 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. DEFINITIONS. A. Recyclable Materials: Means all items of refuse designated by Contractor and City to be part of an authorized recycling program and which are intended for transportation, processing, and re- manufacturing or reuse and include the following: • Boxboard packaging: except for boxes that are made for storage in refrigerator or freezer. • Corrugated cardboard: unless contaminated with food, wax- coated or plastic coated. • Glass containers: all glass food and beverage containers. • Metal containers: aluminum, steel, bimetal food and beverage containers, foil and foil trays. • Mixed paper: direct mail, envelopes, school and office paper, receipts and bills, hard and soft- covered books, paper bags, notebooks, magazines, catalogs and phone books, and shredded paper. • Newspaper: including all paper inserts. • Other Recyclable Materials may also include other materials as mutually agreed upon by the City and Contractor. Recyclable materials also includes any and all solid waste items designated by the Hennepin County Environmental Services Department to be part of an authorized recycling program and which are intended for transportation, processing, and re- manufacturing or reuse. • Plastic: plastic containers #1 - #7, i.e. bottles, cups, food containers, yogurt cups milk jugs except plastic containers that had hazardous waste. • Aseptic, gable — topped and wet strength beverage packaging. • Any additions or exclusions as agreed upon by Contractor and City. B. Recycling Container: Means a cart with a lid, and wheels, minimum size of 30 gallon in which recyclable materials can be stored and later placed at the curb or alley for collection as specified by the City. The container shall be properly marked for recycling. C. Single Stream Recycling Collection Service: Residents will be instructed to commingle all recyclable materials in one container that will be picked up every other week by Contractor. Contractor will pick up all recyclable material placed in and next to recycling containers at Certified Dwelling Units and other City designated collection stops in the City of Edina. D. Certified Dwelling Unit_(CDU): Means a single family home and each residential unit in a building up to an eight -plex, or townhouse complex. Residential units in structures 7057982.1 2 (other than townhouses) containing more than eight dwelling units may be designated as CDU's upon mutual agreement by the City and the Contractor, Exhibit D. E. Contractor: Means person or persons authorized by the City to perform recycling collection services on prescribed routes within collection districts within the City of Edina, which for purposes of this Agreement is Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC. F. Collection Hours: Means the time period during which collection of recyclable material is authorized in the City. G. Missed Collection: Means the failure of the Contractor to provide recycling collection service to a CDU or other City designated collection stop within the recycling district during collection hours on the scheduled collection day. H. Holidays: Means any of the following: New Year's Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. I. Scheduled Collection Day: Means the day or days of the week on which recycling collection service by the Contractor is to occur, as specified in the contract with the City, see Exhibit C. If a Holiday occurs on a weekday, the collection for each day of that week after the Holiday will be made one (1) working day later. Except if a Holiday falls on a weekend day, then collection will be provided on the scheduled collection day. 4. CONTRACTOR'S COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS. A. Residential Curbside Recycling Collection Program. 1. Frequency of Residential Collection: Residential recycling collection shall occur biweekly. 2. Residential Collection Hours: Collection shall commence no earlier than 7:00 a.m. local time and shall be completed by 7:00 p.m. collection day. Residents will be required to have materials placed at the collection point by 7:00 a.m. on the scheduled collection day. 3. Compliance with -Laws and Regulations: In providing services hereunder, the Contractor shall-abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provision of services to be provided hereunder. Any violation shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. This contract shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota, and ordinances of the City of Edina. 4. Weighing of Loads Reporting Requirements and Promotional Material: The Contractor will keep accurate records consisting of an approved weight slip with the date, time, collection route, driver's identification, vehicle number, rate and gross weight, net weight and number of route stops for each loaded vehicle. A 7057982.1 3 detailed monthly report shall be provided to the City that identifies total tonnage activity by commodity. In addition an annual report shall be provided. (See Exhibit A). This report should include all curbside recycling activity. Promotional Material: The Contractor and the City will cooperate in developing a comprehensive -on -going promotional program to ,encourage participation in the recycling program of the City. . The Contractor will be responsible for.providing and incur the-production and .printing costs of informational material outlined.in.the Proposal submitted by the Contractor during the change from a weekly bin collection to an every other week single stream collection. The Contractor will be responsible for providing and incur-the production, printing and mailing costs of an annual public education piece. The Contractor shall confer with the City on any draft, publication& that are distributed within the City regarding the curbside recycling program. , -The City will have final approval before printing. The Contractor shall submit a draft of any public education literature for approval by the City, at least' one (1) month before printing and release of any such literature: (a) The education piece will contain °at. least the following information: a. The Collection Week for each Dwelling, b. The Collection Point, c. The Recyclables to be collected and manner of preparation, d. Holiday and Missed collection information, e. Telephone numbers to call for information or service problems (b) Informational tags for distribution by drivers to those residents who have place non-recyclables or improperly prepared recyclables -for collection. 5. Recycle Cart Purchase, Delivery and Bin Collection: The Contractor agrees to, at its expense, purchase, deliver, service and repair, and maintain sufficient cart inventory to meet supply -and demand needs for- the.,City of Edina Recycling CDU's, estimated to be 14,250 in number, Exhibit D. - The Contractor shall initially deliver one 65- gallon cart to each CDU. and have a. sufficient inventory of 30-gallon and 90- gallon carts available for delivery and switch -out with the 65- gallon carts per resident/customer request. The standard, 65- gallon cart shall be smooth for ease in cleaning. The cart shall be blue with a green lid and be uniform and consistent in color and design and approved instruction label imbedded into each lid, so as to be easily identified by the resident and the Contractor driver as the container for recyclable materials. Recycling Bin Collection:. The Contractor agrees to collect and recycle the 18 gallon bins previously used for recycling. The Contractor will collect bins from mutually agreed upon residential drop -off locations during the month of October 2012, and provide roll -off dumpster. 7057982.1 4 6. Recycling Cart Maintenance/Replacement: The driver is required to report to the Contractor the location of any cart that is damaged. The Recycling Coordinator will notify the Contractor by email of any cart damage or request for change of cart size that is reported/requested to them by customers /residents. Any damaged cart or cart request will be repaired or replaced by the Contractor within two (2) weeks of the report. . 7. Point of Collection: Most residential recycling collection will occur at the same location from where, the regular refuse is collected, generally the street curbside or alley. Carts shall be placed with the handle toward the house and lid opening toward the street or alley. The driver is required to place the emptied cart back/down in the same location as set by resident.. Recycling carts /containers for municipal recycling collection shall be placed at agreed upon specific locations as determined by the Contractor and City. All carts /containers shall be returned to the specific location after completion of collection. 8. Ownership of Recyclable Materials: All recyclable materials for collection shall remain the responsibility and in the ownership of the resident until handled for collection by the Contractor. At the point of collection the recyclable materials become the property of the Contractor. Any person or persons taking recyclable materials from a curbside container without explicit permission of the resident or municipality will be in violation of local ordinance and subject to penalty. The Contractor shall report to the Recycling Coordinator any instances of suspected scavenging or unauthorized removal of recyclable materials from any collection container. 9. Route Management and Customer Service: The Contractor shall, at all times, provide the City's Recycling Coordinator with a lead route /driver supervisor who is accessible to the Contractor dispatch department via two way communications and to the Recycling Coordinator to handle route and collection issues in a timely fashion. The Contractor shall have on duty Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. a dispatch customer service representative to receive customer calls and route issues. The Contractor shall provide a 24 hour answering service line or device to receive customer calls. The Route Supervisor and all collection vehicles must be equipped with 2 -way communication devices. 10. Procedure for Unacceptable Materials Materials Outside Cart and Unreachable Carts: If the Contractor determines that a resident has set out unacceptable recyclable materials or other materials that are not recyclable materials, left recyclable materials outside of the cart, or has positioned the cart so that it is unreachable with the mechanical arm, the Contractor shall use the following procedures: 7057982.1 a. The Contractor shall collect all the recyclable materials and leave an "education tag" provided by the Contractor attached to the handle of the -recycling container indicating acceptable materials, the proper method of preparation and the proper placement of the cart. b. The driver shall 'record the address of repeat educational tags notifications. 11. Procedure for Complaints- Questions - Missed Collections. A complaint of service or missed collection is a complaint received -by the Contractor from either the customer or the Administration ;Office. If the report is for a missed stop and is received by the Contractor before 12:00 p'.M. on a scheduled working day, the Contractor is required to.return to the complaint address and complete the collection. If the report is registered after 12:00 p.m. on a scheduled working day, the Contractor is required to return to the complaint address by 12:00 noon the following working day. 12. Clean up Responsibilities: The Contractor shall adequately clean up any recyclable material spilled or blown during the course of collection and/or hauling operations. All collection vehicles shall be equipped with at least one broom and one shovel for use in cleaning up- material spillage. The Contractor shall have no responsibility to remove or clean up any items, which are not recyclable materials. 13. . Non - Completion of Collection and Extension of Collection Hours: The Contractor shall inform the City of the areas not completed, the reason for non - completion, and the expected time of completion. 14. Collection Vehicle Equipment Requirements: Each collection vehicle shall be equipped with the following: a. A:two.way.communication system. b. A first aid kit. C. An approved 2AIOBC dry chemical fire extinguisher. d. Warning flashers. e. Overhead strobe light. f. "Reverse" audio warning alarm to indicate movement in reverse. g. Signs on the rear of the vehicle which state "This Vehicle Makes Frequent Stops." h. Shall be equipped with some form of monitoring system for the driver to observe the materials as the cart is being dumped into the hopper. i. Hazard flares and cones. j. A broom and a shovel for cleaning up spills. k. "Absorb" pillows or dry product adequate to absorb /contain any oil/liquid spill from collection vehicle. 7057982.1 All required equipment must be in proper working order at all times. All vehicles must be maintained in proper working order and be clean and free from odor as much as possible. All collection vehicles shall be uniformly painted and the paint shall be in good condition. The Contractor's name shall be clearly visible from all sides of the vehicle, along with the Contractor's phone number, and the vehicle ID number. 15. Driver Duties and Responsibilities: The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that there is sufficient personnel and equipment to fulfill the .requirements and specifications of this contract proposal, and that all personnel are trained both in program operations and in customer service and insure that all personnel maintain a positive attitude,with the public and in the work place and shall: a. Conduct themselves at all times in a courteous mariner and use no abusive or foul language. b. Be clean and presentable in appearance, as so far as possible. C. Wear a uniform and employee identification badge or name tag. d. Drive in a safe and considerate manner. e. Manage carts in a careful manner, setting them back in place so as to avoid spillage and littering or damage to container. f. Perform their work in a neat and quiet manner, monitor for any spillage and be responsible for cleaning up any litter or breakage spilled in collection and hauling operations. g. Record all addresses that could not be collected and reasons, turn list into dispatch at end of each collection day. h. Attach an education tab to the container identifying problems and how to resolve them. i. Collect and transport recyclable materials according to all existing laws and ordinances, and future amendments thereto, of the State of Minnesota and local governing bodies. j. Report all damage to property. 16. Holidays: The Contractor will observe all Holidays on which no recycling collection service will be performed. When, a Holiday occurs on a scheduled collection day, the collection.for each day of that week after the Holiday shall be made one (1) working day later. 17. Contract Length: This contract shall commence October 1, 2012 and shall be_ for 7 years, 3 months ending December 31, 201-9 and shall have options upon mutual agreement of the parties for renewal with the terms of 5 or 7 years each. 18. Rate and Scholarship: The price per CDU (Exhibit D) for single -sort curbside collection service per month from October 1, 2012 through December 31, 2019 for the City shall be: 7057982.1 7 Year Price per Curbside CDU per Month Oct 1, 2012 $2.40 2013 $2.40 2014 $2.47 2015 $2.54 2016 $2.61 2017 $2.68 2018 $2.76 2019 $2.84 19. Revenue Sharing and Process fees: The City shall receive a 100% revenue share on the Net Proceeds (defined in Exhibit B) of the sale of all recyclable materials. In no case shall the Net Proceeds be negative (i.e., the City shall not be charged if value of revenue from sale of all recyclable materials is less than processing fees). Payments shall be made on a bi- annual basis per calendar year. The per ton processing fee and formula for sharing Net Proceeds as described in Exhibit B, attached and made a part of this Agreement. Scholarship: The. Contractor has agreed to provide four $500 scholarships annually for the length of this contract. The money is to be awarded annually to an Edina High School student through the Edina Education Fund. The criteria for the scholarship will be determined by the Edina Recycling Coordinator. 20. Default. Any of the following occurrences, conditions, or acts shall be deemed a "Default" under this Agreement: a. If either party fails to observe or perform its obligations under this Agreement and does not cure such failure within ten (10) days from its receipt of written notice of breach without, however, limiting any other rights available to parties pursuant to any other provisions of this Agreement. b. Except as expressly limited hereby, City and Contractor shall have such remedies for the default of the other party hereto as may be provided at 7057982.1 8 law or equity following written notice of such default and failure to cure the same within ten (10) days. 21. Termination. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be terminated without any penalty or further liability as follows: a. Upon ten (10) days written notice in the event of a default (as defined above); b. Upon ninety (90) days written notice by Contractor, if Contractor is unable to obtain or maintain any license, permit or other governmental approval necessary to the operation of the Contractor's business; C. Upon ninety (90) days written notice by City if it determines that Contractor has failed to comply with applicable ordinances, or state or federal law, or any conditions attached to governmental approvals granted thereunder, after a public hearing before the City's Council. 22. Taxes. Contractor shall pay any taxes, of any nature, due, owing or levied in association with its services pursuant to this Agreement. 23. Insurance. a. The Contractor must maintain the types and amounts of insurance set forth in the RFP with the following exceptions: i. Contractor shall not be required to provide coverage for $50,000 in medical expenses per Section 20.2 of the RFP; ii. Contractor shall not be required to provide Professional Liability Insurant or Errors and Omission coverage, so Section 20.4 of the RFP is struck in its entirety as are any references to such insurance in the RFP; iii.. Contractor will provide evidence of insurance on an ACORD form (versus a City- approved) insurance certificate. iv. The second, and third sentences in Section 20.5 of the RFP are struck in their entirety. V. The fourth sentence of Section 20.5 of the RFP is deleted in its entirety to read as.follows: "The successful Proposer shall provide City with a certificate of insurance upon written request from the City." vi. The last sentence of Section 20.5 is deleted in its entirety. b. Adjustment to Insurance Coverage Limits. The coverage limits shall be increased at the time of any rate adjustment by the Consumer Price Index. C. Additional Insured - Certificate of Insurance. The Contractor shall provide, prior to starting services, evidence of the required insurance in the form of a Certificate of Insurance issued by a company (rated A- or 7057982.1 9 better), licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota, which includes all coverages required;in this paragraph.- Contractor will name the City as an Additional Insured on the General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability Polices. The Certificate(s) shall also provide the coverage may not be cancelled -without thirty (3 0) days prior written notice to the City. 24. Indemnification Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives; from and against any and all claims,, costs, losses, expenses, demands, actions, or causes of action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, which may be asserted against or incurred by City or for which City may be liable in the performance of this Agreement, except those which arise solely from the negligence, willful misconduct, or other fault of City. Contractor shall defend the City,against all claims arising out of the performance of this Agreement. 25. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered or mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested, or sent by overnight carrier to the following addresses: If to City, to: City of Edina 4801 W. 40'' Street Edina, Minnesota, 55424 Attention: Solvei Wilmot If to Contractor, to: Allied Waste Services c/o Rich Hirstein 9813 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55347 26. Assignment. This Agreement, or "rights thereunder, may not be sold, assigned, or transferred at any time by Contractor without the written consent of the City, which consent shall "not be unreasonably withheld. 27. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, personal representatives and assigns. 28. Miscellaneous. a. The prevailing party in any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs, including appeals, if any. b. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations and other agreements. 7057982.1 10 These are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties. C. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. d. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. CITY: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF EDINA BY: BY: James Hovland, Mayor AND Scott Neal, City Manager 7057982.1 11 Bryan Zimmerman, Area President Exhaba$ A Monthly Reports. The Contractor will submit to the City monthly reports. At a minimum, the Contractor shall include the following information in its monthly reports: (a) Gross amounts of materials collected; by recyclable material (in tons). (b) Net amounts of materials marketed,, by recyclable material (in tons) (c) Amounts stored, by recyclable material, with any notes as to unusual conditions (in tons) (d) Amounts of "process residuals", disposed (in tons),, (e) Recycling service fee (based,upon -- contracted price per -ton). (f) Revenue share back to the City (if any) Monthly reports hall be due to the City by the 15ffi day of each month. Annual Reports. The Contractor will submit an annual report to the City by Feb 1 st of each calendar year for the previous year collections. The annual report' shall include: (a) Annual sum total of tons of materials collected - (b) Set out rates and participation rates: (c) Annual progress on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from activities under this contract. The Contractor must indicate what model vehicles they use in their fleet and fuel type. The Contractor must also describe other means of energy conservation on the Edina collection routes and at the materials processing facility. (d) Annual summary of complaints received, methods used to handle and respond to such complaints, and summary of complaint types. (e) Contra ctor's.recommendations for improvement in the City's recycling program including adding materials to be; collected, ,enhanced public. education, multifamily recycling and other opportunities. (h) Response to any City staff recommendations for Contractor's service improvements. (i) Other opportunities for improvement with the remaining years under the contract. Annual reports shall be due by January 31 each-year. 7057982.1 12 Exhibit B Published Industry Market Indices Product Mix Market Indicator Mix Glass Reviewed Annually HDPE Natural Waste News 1St Issue High HDPE Pigmented Waste News 1St Issue High PET Waste News 1St Issue High Residual Garbage Hennepin County Rate Tin Average Monthly Sales Price Aluminum AMM'High OCC OBM #8 High Mixed Paper OBM #8 High ONP OBM #8 High Revenue Share Processing Fees Oct. 1,2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 All recycling materials 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Processing Fees Determining revenue share The Contractor shall pay a net revenue after processing fees from the sale of the recyclable material that is collected. The Contractor shall use the agreed upon Published Market indices for the sale of the materials:' Determining Materials Composition as Collected The Contractor shall conduct at least one materials composition analysis of the City's recyclable materials during the term of the contract any and every.extension of this Agreement to estimate the relative amount by weight of each recyclable commodity from each program element by grade or offer a suitable alternative to a composition analysis. The results of this analysis shall include: (1) percent by weight of each recyclable commodity by grade (including materials deemed unacceptable) as collected from the City program element; (2) relative change compared to the previous year's composition; and (3) a description of the methodology used to calculate the composition, including number of samples, dates weighed, and City route(s) used for sampling. The Contractor shall provide the City with a copy 7057982.1 11 Oct. 1, 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Per ton for each recycling commodity $92.50 $92.50 $92.50 $92.50 $92.50 $92.50 $92.50 $92.50 Determining revenue share The Contractor shall pay a net revenue after processing fees from the sale of the recyclable material that is collected. The Contractor shall use the agreed upon Published Market indices for the sale of the materials:' Determining Materials Composition as Collected The Contractor shall conduct at least one materials composition analysis of the City's recyclable materials during the term of the contract any and every.extension of this Agreement to estimate the relative amount by weight of each recyclable commodity from each program element by grade or offer a suitable alternative to a composition analysis. The results of this analysis shall include: (1) percent by weight of each recyclable commodity by grade (including materials deemed unacceptable) as collected from the City program element; (2) relative change compared to the previous year's composition; and (3) a description of the methodology used to calculate the composition, including number of samples, dates weighed, and City route(s) used for sampling. The Contractor shall provide the City with a copy 7057982.1 11 of each analysis. City staff will help coordinate the sampling and shall be invited by the Contractor to be present for the sorting., Exhibit C Collection Route Map (by collection day of the week) 7057982.1 14 day City of Edina VC Residential Recycling E Pick -Up Schedule D- Exhibit D Multi — Family Housing on Recycling Pickup 7057982.1 15 4! hurs., , ZV Ox Kv ts' Thursday a " Tuesday day City of Edina VC Residential Recycling E Pick -Up Schedule D- Exhibit D Multi — Family Housing on Recycling Pickup 7057982.1 15 Name Address Zip Units 55436 Apartments, 8 or fewer units: Cahill of Edina 7400 -7486 Cahill Rd 5107 49' St W 55436 5 5115 49"' St W 55436 5 5148 Hankerson 55436 4 4200 Valley View Rd 55424 4 4240 Valley View Rd 55424 4 4246 Valley View Rd 55424 3 4000 Mavelle Drive 55435 4 7101 Lynmar Lane 55435 4 4300 Parklawn Avenue 55435 8 4200 64"' Street 55424 3 7220 -7240 Lewis Ridge Apartments Subtotal 44, Condo, 8 or fewer units: Edina Morningside 4.360 France Ave 55410 8 Valley View Est 6201 Brookview "Ave 55424 5 Condos Subtotal 13 Townhomes: Blake Ridge 6055 -6141 Blake Rd Road 55436 31 Cahill of Edina 7400 -7486 Cahill Rd 55439 44 Colony 6330 Barrie Road 55435 236, Dewey Hill.IIl Shaughnessy Rd & Lochmere Terrace 55439 34 Edina Mills 4699 -12 France Ave 55410 7 . Gleason Court 6400 -6519 Gleason Ct 55436 28 Habitat Ct. 6100 -6121 Habitat Ct. 55436 18 Highcroft 5501 -65 70"' St W 55439 21 Highlander 7032 Cahill Rd 55439 17 Lewis Ridge 7220 -7240 Lewis Ridge 5543.9 15 Londonderry Duncan Ln, Tucker Ln 55436_ 36. Manor Homes Edina 6800 Langford Drive 55436 -144 Nine Mile Village' Falcon, Oriole, Pheasant, Red Fox, Sandpiper (55436) 97 Pondwood 7700 -7744 Pondwood Dr 55439 24 Summit Hill 5205 Interlachen.Blvd. 55436 5 Tanglewood Court 7700 -7733 Tanglewood 55436 32 Vernon Court 6200 -6216 Vernon Ct. _ 55436 5 Vernon Hills Vernon Hills Road 55436 16 Vernon Woods 6703 -6711 Vernon Ave 55436 5 Waterford Court 6100 -6110 Waterford 55436 10 Wellesley Place 1 -8 Wellesley Place- 55436 8 White Oaks 4620 -4626 France Ave 55439 4 Woodview Court 7650 -7677 Woodview Ct 55436 23 Townhomes Subtotal 132 GRAND TOTAL Multi- Unit 949 Note: Habitat Ct., Waterford Ct, Gleason Cl., Tanglewood Ct and Vernon Hills function as townhomes but are classified R -2 by City – two unit side by side buildings, zero lot line. 7057982.1 16 Certified Dwelling The total certified dwelling unit number is derived from the utility billing reports, 2011. Dwelling Number Single Family 13,298 Multi -unit up to,8 units " 949 Total CDU's ' 14,247 7057982.1 17 • • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. D. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ - Discussion ❑ Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -88 Appointing Primary Election Judges ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFO /BACKGROUND: Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that the governing body of the municipality appoint election judges to administer -the polling places at least 25 days before each election. Due to legislative changes the Primary Election will be held August 14, 2012 with Absentee Balloting opening June 29, 2012. In order for Absentee Judges to begin their work in a timely manner we must appoint them at this time. The attached Resolution 2012 -88 lists the persons intended to serve Election Judges and Absentee Judges in alphabetical order. We will be placing five to six persons in each polling location at the Primary, plus running an Absentee Ballot Board. In addition, we will train alternates to substitute in case others cannot serve. When assigning the judges to a precinct we will maintain the party balance in each precinct and on our absentee board as required by statutes. In addition, this year, Hennepin County will be acting on behalf of the City of Edina as a part of our Absentee Ballot Board so they are named in our appointing resolution. I also ask for the authority to replace or substitute judges as necessary before Election Day. • ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2012 -88 RESOLUTION NO 2012 -88 APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 14, 2012 PRIMARY WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 20413.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. BE ITAESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Edina Primary Election-judges for the August 14, 2012 Primary Election; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Edina City Council also appoints other individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn. Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2 under the direction of the Election Manager to serve as members of the Edina Absentee Ballot Board; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 19th day of June, 2012. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct' copy of the Resolution duly adopted, by the Edina City' Council at its regular meeting of June 19, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk CITY OF EDINA ' 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0390 PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES AUGUST 14, 2012 Stacy Abena Laurie Fetterman Mary Landberg Judith Rodgers Katherine Aby Bob Fiedler Paul Lane William Rodgers Rita Acker Paul Fink Karen Lanz Robert Rohlf Carolyn Anderson Lisa Flint Gertrude Lappin Luann Rosenthal - Mary Louise Anderson John Fossum Kristine Larsen Erickson Lavonne Andres Rebecca Frederick Barbara Larson Carol Rothe Terrill Arnst Ginny Frey Patricia Leefeldt Milagros Rush Marsha Bard Marcia Friedman Bonnie Leer Mary E. Ryan Lisa Batdorf Suzanne Fuluvaka Kelsey Lemmer Mike Samuels Chris Bauleke Valerie Geurts Karen Leon Randy Sawatzky Mary Becker Daniel Gieseke Susan Lindsay Avelina Schneider Carol Bertelson Devorah Goldstein Ellen Loewenberg Connie Schramm Cynthia Beuerlein George Griffiths Cynthia Loveland Aundria Schreiner Juliet Boemer Doris Grimes William Lucas Sara Schwiebert Mary Book Muza Habeck Mark Lumry Marilyn Sedoff Raymond Book Eugene Haman Karen Lundholm Marion Selid Holly Borgen Judith Hansen Barbara Maeder Katherine Sewell Katherine Bradbury Joan Hanson Linda Maetzold Lincoln Shea ZoeAnne Brandberg Paige Harmon Connie Mase Michael Skelly Adele Brellenthin Mary Hartupee Boyd Mast Margaret Skibbe Kathy Bronner Buddy Hasnudeen Patti Mazzara Mary Skoy James Burnett Mary Jo Hasnudeen Mariette McBurney Ruth Smith Mary Calgren Sharon Hed Barb McFarlane Susan Smith Christine Campion Jackie Heinen Rosemary McGlynn Cathy Snyder John Cardle Cheryl Heley Frank McGoldrick Gail Stalpes John Carlson Bethel Hoaglund Joy S McHenry Vivian Steblay Sandra Carlson William Holden Susan McKusick Lee Strang Jane Carpenter Alan Holst Joan McMillan Robert Sundquist Pauline Carroll Nancy Hopf Carol Melichar Ann Swanson Cathy Cella Judy Hoppe Jane Meller Philothea Sweet Yvonne Christensen Rosalene Horner Luana Metil Diana Thompson Marilyn Christiansen Annette Horton Karen Miller Andrea Tiggas Eileen Cooke, Terri Hudoba Nancy Miller Donna Tilsner Jack Cracraft Marion Hurley Janet Moberg Janet Ulvin Marian Cracraft Myra Hykes Pat Montez Patricia Vander Wall Colleen Crew Rosemary Jellen Beth Montgomery Mary Vanek Deborah Croker Shirley Johnson Linda Murdock Patricia Vaurio Spencer Crum Allen Johnson Susan Niefeld Ray Voss Judie Dale Kate Johnson Wallace Norlander Lou Ann Waddick Marjorie Dale Mary Kachan Patti Olander Deb Waldin Byron Dale Ann R Kapaun Marde Olson Donna Wallander Gloria Danielson Patriciz Kattleman' Ordell O'Neill Jini Washburn Donna D'Aquila Dalia Katz Norman Owens Jenny Weber Gloria DeBerg Ann Keenan Mary Pate Deanna Weeks Amy Demarest Joan Keiner Jean Pearce Paul Wehrmeister Delpha DeZellar Louise Kellams Wain Pearce Mary Jean Weigel Patricia Dill Katherine Ketchum Edward Petersen Mike Welbaum John Dimmock Jessica Kingston John Peterson Donald Wenger Lisa Domke Mavis Klefsaas Betty Pollitt Ardis Wexler Wendy Donovan Marcia Koester Linda Presthus Elizabeth Wolff Sheila Duhn Janet Kopp Joyce Quinn Kathryn Woxland Sontrud Duke Julia Kosters Robert Reed Mary Yee Emma Eberlein Martha Kouatli Eric Rehm Deborah Zierden Erika Eberlein Hana Koudsi Jennifer Roach William Ehrich James Landberg Lois Robertson owed, 14 �� C11 �y • l�CORPORP-�4'O/ �eaa REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. E. From: Karen Kurt Assistant City Manager Date June 19, 2012 Subject: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — 2013 INSURANCE RENEWAL: GENERAL LIABILITY AND WORKERS COMPENSATION Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Travelers 1. $770,142.00 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Travelers - $770,142.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Attached is the breakdown of premiums proposed by Travelers for the City's liability insurance renewal from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. Even with the $1,500,000 increase in added equipment which covers a previous omission, the total premium will decrease $19,775 (2.5 %). Included in the quote is Workers Compensation, which increased $8,021 (1.7 %). Travelers is the only quote because of the limited market for this type of coverage. Bill Homeyer is present to answer questions. Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within J„ohntWallin, Financ Director Nedf, Qity N/kf oer ,I 4 City of Edina 7 -1 -12 Renewal 2011 2012 Equipment ($2,618,955 of value in 2011 $9,175 $14,585 $4,166,339 of value in 2012) Auto Liability $77,073 $70,834 Auto Physical Damage $11,879 $14,633 General Liability $78,070 $56,896 Employment Liability ($25,000 ded) $21,368 $21,369 Law Enforcement Liability ($10,000 ded) $74,181 $65,502 Management Liability ($10,000 ded) $10,609 $8,601 Liquor Liability $23,447 $25,586 Work Comp (Exp Mod .89 in'11 &.97 in'12) $484,115 $492,136 Total $789,917 $770,142 0 o e Cn o lase REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. F. From: Karen Kurt Assistant City Manager Date June 19, 2012 Subject: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — 2013 INSURANCE RENEWAL: PROPERTY Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Travelers 1. $70,906.00 2. Affiliated FM 2. $80,000.00 3. Chartis 3. $100,000.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Travelers - $70,906.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Attached is Travelers' proposal for the City's property insurance renewal from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. Due to the Golf Dome loss and the target premium of $65,000 to $70,000, four companies did not choose to submit a quote. Travelers remains the lowest quoted coverage. Their proposal, however, includes some changes. The rate will increase by 15% to .0496/100. The deductible on the Golf Dome will increase from $15,000 to $25,000. Lastly, the value of the property insured will increase by 16% to $142,570,482. ' In combination, the changes will result in a premium increase of $17,513 or 33 %. Jack Carroll is present to answer questions. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not withii Pricing Renewal Property Proposal July 1, 2012 to July 1; 2013 o� coop o 0 0� C Payment Plan with Travelers — 25% down, 9 equal payments — no interest hAmy documents \risk management12012 property proposal.doc Adam0 Rating Basis (Property): $123,222,325 $142,570,482, $122,712,323 $122,712,323 Rate (Property): $.0431/ $100 $.0496/ $100 $.0652/ $100 $.0815/ $100' Estimated Annual Property Premium: $53,143 $70,656 $80,000 $1009000 Boiler & Machinery Premium:. Included Included Included Included Marine Premium: Included Included Included Included Crime Premium: $250 $250 N/A N/A Total Estimated Package Premium $53,393 $70,906 $80,000 $100,000 C Payment Plan with Travelers — 25% down, 9 equal payments — no interest hAmy documents \risk management12012 property proposal.doc I o e ycOJeea REPORT/RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. G. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: Request for Purchase - Consultant Engineering Construction Phase Services - Tracy Avenue Reconstruction Project ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for Consultant Engineering Construction Phase Services for Tracy Avenue Reconstruction Project. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is the proposal from WSB, Inc. for construction phase services for Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Project. This project was awarded to Eureka Construction,. Inc. at the June 5 City Council Meeting and is scheduled to begin June 25. The estimated fee for this service is $120,318.00. ATTACHMENTS: Construction Engineering Proposal Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Project g: \pw \central svcs \eng div \pro1ects \contracts \2012 \eng 12 -5 tracy avenue \adman \legal\Item Iv, g. consultant engineering construction phase services - tracy avenue.docx May 25, 2012 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE City Engineer City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439. RE: , Edina, Minnesota Tracy Avenue (Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue) SAP 120 - 145 -013 Construction Services City Project No. BA - 368 Dear Mr. Houle: We are pleased to provide you this proposal, which includes the scope of services and budget for construction administration and surveying, for the Tracy Avenue Reconstruction Project. We have enclosed the Scope of Work and Estimate of Cost. If the scope and fee as proposed appears to be appropriate, please sign on the space provided and retain one copy for your records. Please feel free to contact us 763 -541 -4800 if there is any additional questions. Thank you for the opportunity and we look forward to completing the work for the City. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Charles Rickart, PE Principal Enclosures Approved by: Signature Its: Title Date Andrew Plowman, PE Project Manager Tracy Avenue (Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue) Construction Services SCOPE OF WORK The following assumptions were used in determining the scope of work and estimated cost for the Tracy Avenue construction services: • The actual construction will begin in mid -June 2012 and be substantially completed by mid - October 2012, For cost estimating purposes, it is assumed construction will take 18 weeks. Task 1— Project Management /Construction Contract Management This task will include preparation of monthly invoices, communication with City staff on administrative issues, and general management of the project. This will include periodic meetings with City staff on the project status as necessary. WSB will provide overall construction contract management for the project. This will include: 1. Coordinating all construction activities with the onsite construction observer and contactor on behalf of the City. 2. Preparation, submittal and securing approval for any change orders through the City and MnDOT State Aid 3. Preparation an d submission of monthly pay requests. 4. Addressing any design issues. 5. Conducting weekly construction meetings at Public Works. Preparing and distributing meeting minutes - 6. Meeting with City Staff, residents and/or Countryside Elementary School, as necessary. 7. Coordinating the final project closeout including final pay voucher and ensuring that all punch list items and warranty items have been addressed. 8. Providing City Extra updates weekly, Overall Project Mailings monthly and Twitter updates up to 3 times per day. It is assumed that these services will be completed based on an average of 8 hours per week during the construction. Task 2 — Construction Inspection WSB will provide the day -to -day construction observation and coordination. This will include: 1. Completing and submitting all City and MnDOT State aid project documentation required. . 2. Ensuring that all aspects of the project meet the requirements in the plans and specifications. 3. Collecting Data and redlining plans for as -built drawings. 4. Coordinating the construction activities with the local residents. Ensuring they are informed on any issues related to their specific property. 5. Keeping the City and the Construction Contract Manager informed on a status of construction on a daily basis. Proposal — Tracy Avenue (Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue) — Construction Services Page 1 City Of Edina r, It is assumed that the construction observer will be onsite up to 50 hours per week. Task 3 — Construction Survey WSB will provide surveying services during construction. WSB's survey crew will be available as needed to locate and provide all necessary staking for the contractor. The survey crew will be scheduled through the onsite construction observer. It is assumed that the survey crew would be onsite an average of 8 hours per week. Task 4 — Record Drawings Following completion of construction, WSB will prepare as -built plans based on redlines prepared by the construction observer. The plans will be completed and provided to the City in electronic, (ACAD),format. Task 5 — Project Closeout WSB will provide all necessary documentation for successful State Aid and City project closeout. This will include meeting with MnDOT personnel for a final walk through of the project. WSB will perform an internal audit to ensure everything is complete in the event the project is audited by MnDOT. ESTIMATED COST Based on the above Scope or Work, we estimate our fee to be $120,318.00. The hours and cost are based on our best estimation of the project at this time. WSB will only charge for actual time spent on the project. The`estimated cost is based on our current (2012) fee schedule. These rates will therefore be used for the duration of the project. ESTIMATED COST Tasks Cost Task 1 - Project Management $14,390.00 Task 2 — Construction Inspection $79,200.00 Task 3 — Survey $20,374.00 Task 4 — Record Drawings $2,684.00 Task 5 — Project Closeout $2,170:00 Total Labor Cost $118,818.00 Expenses (Mileage, Printing, etc $1,500.00 Total Project Cost $120,318.00 Proposal — Tracy Avenue (Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue) — Construction Services Page 2 City Of Edina . w9A,r� Ow e ' v ' �y a r�R�ResB / REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. H. From: Karen Kurt � Action Assistant City Manager ❑ Discussion Information Date: June 29, 2012 Subject: Resolution Adopting the Performance Measures Developed by the Council on Local Results and Innovation and the 2012 Performance Measure Report ACTION REQUESTED: Approve resolution adopting the performance measures developed by the Council on Local Results and Innovation and the 2012 Performance Measure Report. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Legislature created the Council on Local Results and Innovation. In February 2011, the Council released a standard set of ten performance measures for cities that will aid residents, taxpayers, and state and local elected officials in determining the efficacy of counties and cities in providing services, and measure residents' opinions of those services. At that time, Edina enrolled in the proposed program. In February of 2012, the Council released a comprehensive performance measurement system for cities and counties to adopt in 2012 and fully implement in 2013. Cities that elect to participate in the standard measures program for 2012 are eligible for a reimbursement of $0.14 per capita in local government aid, not to exceed $25,000 and are also exempt from levy limits under sections 275.70 to 275.74 for taxes payable in 2013 (if levy limits were in effect — which they are not). t In order to receive the per capita reimbursement in 2012, counties and cities must file a report with the Office of the State Auditor by July 1, 2012. The report must contain a resolution indicating that the City has adopted the program and the actual results of the performance The Council on Local Results and Innovation's measurement program is very basic. The City has also joined the International City /County Management Association (ICMA)'s introductory performance measurement program (CP101) which contains more measures across more functional areas. The City will receive a report from ICMA on its inaugural year results in August. Staff is looking forward to talking more about how performance measurement will support our new direction in work planning during our upcoming business and budget meetings. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and Report RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -90 ADOPTING THE PERMORMANCE MEASURES DEVELOPED BY THE COUNCIL ON LOCAL RESULTS AND INNOVATION AND THE 2012 PERFORMANCE MEASURE REPORT WHEREAS The State of Minnesota has adopted a performance measurement program developed by the CouncTon Local Results. and Innovation and participation in the program bestows certain benefits to participating government organizations, WHEREAS, The City of Edina supports transparency and accountability in government operations, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the.Edina City Council of Edina Minnesota as follows: 1. Adopts and implements the minimum ten performance measures developed by the Council on Local Results and Innovation; 2. Will implemented a local performance measurement system as developed by the Council on Local Results and Innovation;. - 3. Will survey its residents on the services included in the performance benchmarks; and 4. Will report the attached results of the ten adopted measures to its residents before the end of the calendar year through publication, direct mailing, posting on the website, or through -a public hearing at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed. Dated: June 19, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA 1 James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting., WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov 952- 927 -8861. Fax,952- 826 -0390 Council on Local Results and Innovation Performance Measures U) Report to the State Auditor ,y June 19, 2012 Council on Local Results and City of Edina Innovation Performance Measures Results through December 31, 2011 General: 1. Citizens' rating of overall quality of 2011 Quality of Life Survey Questions #11 -23 (averaged) services Excellent -34% Good - 55% Only Fair - 6% Poor -2% Don't Know -3% 2. Percent change in taxable property -2.21% from 2010 to 2011 market value 3. Citizens' rating of overall appearance of 2011 Quality of Life Survey Question #45 the City Excellent - 11% Good - 48% Only Fair - 20% Poor - 5% Don't Know - 17% Police 4a. Part I and II crime rates Part I crimes - 2028 (2010) Part II crimes - 2292 (2010) 4b. Police response time Fire Services: 263.5 seconds (4.39 minutes) 5a. Citizens' rating of quality of fire 2011 Quality of Life Survey Question #12 protection services Excellent, - 67% Good - 28% Fair -1% Poor - 0% Don't Know - 3% 5b. Fire response time 340 seconds (5.67 minutes) 5c. Emergency Medical Services response 259 seconds (4.30 minutes) time 6. Average city street pavement condition Using the pavement condition index (PCI) scale of 0 -100, rating the average condition of the pavements in Edina is 53. 7. Citizens' rating of the quality of 2011 Quality of Life Survey Question #22 snowplowing on streets Excellent - 40% Good - 55% Fair - 4% Council on Local Results and Innovation Performance 8a. Citizens' rating of dependability and quality of City water City of Edina December Poor - 1% Don't Know -1% 2011 Quality of Life Survey Question #14 Excellent -10% Good - 61% Fair - 19% Poor - 9% Don't Know - 0% 8b. Operating cost per 1,000,000 gallons of $1,943.00 water pumped Sanitary Sewer: 9a. Citizens' rating of dependability and 2011 Quality of Life Survey Question #15 quality of City sanitary sewer service Excellent - 20% Good-77% Fair -1% Poor -1% Don't Know -2% 9b. Number of sewer blockages on City Number of sewer blockages = ten system per 100 connections 10/(48,000/100) = 0.0208 Parks and Recreation: 10. Citizens' rating of the quality of City 2011 Quality of Life Survey Questions #17 (park recreational programs and facilities (parks, maintenance) trails, park buildings) Excellent - 41% Good - 57% Fair -1% Poor - 0% Don't Know -1% 2011 Quality of Life Survey Question #18 (trails) Excellent - 31% Good - 62% Fair -5% Poor - 1% Don't Know -3% 2011 Quality of Survey Question #19 (recreation) Excellent - 30% Good - 59% Fair - 0% Poor - 0% Don't Know - 11% 'NA ,Z O e REPORURECOMMEN RATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item - Item No. V.A. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: Receive Comprehensive Annual Ended December 31, 2011 Financial Report (CAFR) For Year ACTION REQUESTED: Recommend receipt of 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). James Eichten, CPA, from Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A., (MMKR) the Principal in charge of the audit, will be present at the meeting to present the CAFR and Management Report. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is the following: Independent Auditors' Management Report Independent Auditors' Special Purpose Audit Reports 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report can be viewed on the City's web site. The purpose of each report is as follows: The Management Report is a report by the auditors to communicate information relevant to city finances and to provide comments resulting from their audit process. The Special Purpose Audit Reports is the result of the extensive audit performed to assess the City's internal controls and to assure compliance with all of the State's and Federal Government's statutes, laws and regulations. The auditors this year found one occurrence where the City did not comply with State statutes and Federal laws and regulations. Finance staff has responded to this finding. The auditors did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that they consider to be material weaknesses. The 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is the accumulation of all Finance functions compiled in a format prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, The State of Minnesota, and The Federal Government. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report consists of a number of sections: The Introductory Section has a letter from the Finance Director, a listing of elected and appointed officials and an organization chart. The. Financial Section includes the Auditors' Opinion and Management's Discussion and Analysis letter. The Basic Financial Statements is the part of the report that details the 2011 accounting for the City, as well as the notes to the financial statements. The Required Supplementary Information includes the budgetary comparison schedule for the General Fund along with the related notes. The Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules are the financial statements for the non -major funds. The Supplementary Financial Information includes various schedules of debt and assessed valuation. The Statistical Section has a number of schedules again required by the above mentioned boards and governments. Arne M\t, \rota REPORURECOM MEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VI.A. From: Cary Teague, Community ® Action Development Director Discussion Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — To construct a new home one -foot above the first floor elevation of the exiting home at 5537 .Park Place for Kate Schmitt, Resolution No. 2012 -84 Deadline July 14, 2012 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution No. 2012 -84 approving the Conditional Use Permit. I N FORMATION /BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home at 5537 Park Place, which would allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the previous home by more than one foot. Specifically the applicant would .like to raise the first floor elevation 3.75 feet above the first floor elevation of the previous home that had occupied the site. The new first floor is proposed to be 2.75 feet over the one foot allowed by city code in order to reasonably protect the lower level of the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The proposed building height to the ridge line of the new home would be 30 feet; 5 feet lower than what would be allowed at 35 feet. (See attached Planning Commission staff report for the complete details on the request.) Planning Commission Review: On June 13, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit. (See the attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2012 -84 approving the Conditional Use Permit. • Planning Commission Staff Report, June 13, 2012 , • Draft minutes from the June 13, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting OF MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826- 0371J�`!�:\ Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofFdina.com a �\ Date: June 14, 2012 i To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne D. Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Review of 5537 Park Place I I Engineering is recommending the following design be incorporated into the final construction plans prior to issuance of a permit: • Provide better drainage swale along easterly property line to drain the northeasterly and easterly area of the property to West 561h Street. • Provide better drainage swale along north property line - drain the westerly half of property to Park Place. i • A curb cut permit will be required from the Engineering Department. • Connect sump pump to drain pipe along easterly side of Park Place or to catch basin located at northeasterly corner of Park Place and West 561h Street. G: \PW \ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \P Streets \5537 Park Place \20120614 WH to CT Review of 5537 Park - Place -clot - -- — -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - -- Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 91NA, o� e RESOLUTION NO. 2012-84 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 5537 PARK PLACE FOR KATE SCHMITT BE IT RESOLVED by.the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City Of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to tear down and construct a new home at 5537 Park Place. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. Specifically the applicant would like to raise the first floor elevation 3.75 feet above the existing first floor elevation. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: . Lot 4, Block 8, COLONIAL GROVE THIRD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.03 On June 13, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit. Vote: 7 Ayes and 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The homes in the area have a variety of height; mass and scale. 4. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a new home at 5537 Park Place, subject to the. following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped August 19, 2011 • Building plans and elevations date stamped May 23, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 WWW.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-84 Page Two 3. Final grading•and drainage plans.are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 19, 2012. ATTEST: - Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day,of 12012. City Clerk MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING. COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 13, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Acting Chair Staunton called the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission to order at 7:00 PM. II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Commissioners Scherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Pla'tteter, Rock, Carpenter and Fischer Absent from the roll: Potts and Cherkassy III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Meetin&Agenda was approved as submitted. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA V. COMMUNITYCOMMENT VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS C. Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home one -foot above the first floor elevation,of the existing home at 5537 Park, place forXate Schmitt Planner. Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the property owner Kate. Schmitt, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home at 5537 Park Place. A Conditional Use Permit is being requested to allow the first floor elevation. of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the previous home by more than one foot. Specifically the applicant would like. to raise the first floor elevation 3.75 feet above the first floor elevation of the previous home that had occupied the site. The first floor of the previous home was at 865.3 feet. The new first floor is proposed to be at 869.05 feet. The maximum allowed increase without a Conditional Use Permit is 866.3 feet The new first Page 1 of 7 floor is proposed to be 2.75 feet over the one foot allowed by city code in order to reasonably protect the lower level of the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The attached Report of Geotechnical Exploration and letter dated May 1, 2012, from ITCO Allied Engineering Co., regarding ground water levels indicates ground water at a level of 855.29 with a recommended lowest floor elevation of 859.29. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for a new home at 5537 Park Place. The Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation of 869.05 feet which is 3.75 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing home and 2.75 feet above first floor height allowed by ordinance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: Survey date stamped August 19, 2011 Building plans and elevations date stamped May 23, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Appearing for the Applicant Kate Schmitt, applicant and Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes. Discussion /Comments Vice Chair Staunton explained that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow construction of a single dwelling home with a first floor elevation of more than one -foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing home. Staunton said the CUP process was established to accommodate construction and /or the remodeling of property within a flood plain or to protect the dwelling from ground water intrusion. Continuing, Staunton said that Code also requires confirmation from FEMA and a licensed hydrologist. Page 2 of 7 Commissioner Fischer further clarified that the request for a CUP was different from a request for variance. Fischer said with a variance the Commission looks at finding hardship; with the conditional use permit an applicant is required to meet specific conditions as outlined in the Code. Commissioner Schroeder asked Planner Aaker if Code provides a definition of mass. Planner Aaker responded the Code does not define mass. Applicant Presentation Scott Busyn, 4615 Wooddale Avenue, addressed the Commission and explained that the house was in disrepair and was raised, adding that the vacant lot was removed from the Federal Emergency Management Agency in 2012. Busyn said that while the property was.removed from the special flood hazard area, it:still has elevated ground water issues. Continuing, Busyn said that the lot is located in the Colonial Grove neighborhood which is an area of different `housing types and a neighborhood in transition. Busyn pointed out that in this area because of the groundwater issues many of the homes do not have basements and to keep this home "dry', the house can't be constructed at the required 1 -foot level. Busyn told the Commission the Schmitt's want the new house to fit into the neighborhood. Busyn said they worked very hard.to be respectful of building height pointing out that the height of the proposed house could actually be higher. Busyn said that the low floor elevation is 859.3 -feet, adding ,the applicant desires to have an 8.75 - foot ceiling height in the basement. Busyn said eight to nine foot basement ceiling heights are typical in Edina in new home construction. Busyn did acknowledged that code requires basement ceiling height to be 74eet or greater. Continuing, Busyn said that the home proposed to be built will be a beautiful home constructed with high quality building materials. Busyn added he held a neighborhood meeting and. communicated with all neighbors. Busyn also noted that a sign was posted on the site indicating.this property was seeking a CUP. . Commissioner Schroeder asked Mr. Busyn his definition. is of "mass ". Busyn responded that'at the end of the day it's.:usually how the new house ties into the neighborhood. Busyn said to ensure that the mass of the new house fits in with the neighborhood the ridge height, eave line, etc., of the adjacent houses need to be calculated to ensure that the proposed house ties into the neighborhood. Busyn also pointed out that the streetscape was also important to keep in mind when designing a new house. Commissioner Platteter noted that even though the low floor elevation is being raised to accommodate the ground water the height of the proposed house is still below what it I be. Busyn agreed, he added the first floor elevation was raised; however through design features the house is being "squashed from the top. Page 3 of 7 Vice -Chair Staunton open the public hearing. Public Comment Brian Belanger, 5533 Oaklawn Avenue said his concern was with the finished roof height adding that he was pleased to learn that the height was actually lower than what was permitted. Mr. Belanger commented that he was surprised that Edina Code doesn't' define "mass ". Continuing, Belanger said he likes what he sees; adding in his opinion the proposed house is nicely proportioned and blends well with the neighborhood. Concluding, Belanger said his concern is if veering away from the 1 -foot rule becomes common place. He stated he doesn't what the 1 -foot rule ignored; but strictly enforced, unless circumstances warrant otherwise. Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Continuina Discussion Commissioner Fischer reported for those in the audience and at home that this is only the second time the City has heard a request for a CUP to accommodate FEMA and ground water issues. The CUP is a tool that allows the City to scrutinize each request to ensure all requirements of the Code are met. Continuing, Fischer said that height is easy to measure; the harder point is mass and scale. This request met Code conditions #2 and #4 which allowed the applicant to move forward with the CUP. Fischer stated from a mass perspective that he believes this design does a good job in responding to the requirements stipulated in the Code. Commissioner Forrest commented that it appeared to her that the orientation of the house was changing. Mr. Busyn agreed. He said that the front door of new house would face West 56 Street with the garage facing Park Place. Commissioner Scherer commented that although it appears to be common practice for new homes to have basement ceiling heights of 8 plus feet the building Code only requires basements to have 7 -foot ceilings. Scherer pointed out it's the choice of the applicant to exceed the ceiling height minimum requirement. Teague agreed; adding minimum basement ceiling height is 7 -feet. Teague explained that the CUP process was established to allow properties to "get out of the flood zone; which is a Code requirement. Teague also noted that basements are required by Code and it can be argued that the City has conflicting ordinances. Scherer stated she really likes the design and scale of the home; however, it's a conundrum for her if the ceiling height exceeds 7 -feet. Concluding, Scherer said she agrees with Busyn that Colonial Grove is a neighborhood in transition and with the flood and ground water issues in this area she envisions that more CUP's will be requested. Commissioner Fischer acknowledged that point; adding the easy part of these requests is where the basement level starts, however, he added there are other issues to Page 4 of 7 consider; what's necessary; what's. required and what's best for re -sale which becomes what's best for Edina. A brief discussion ensued on basement ceiling height. What's building code and what's best and if a "maximum" basement ceiling height should be established in the Conditional Use Permit application. Commissioner Carpenter commented that his sense is that the Code is relatively new and that it will take time to see how it's working. Carpenter said reviewing it on a case by case basis; in his opinion was best. He said establishing a basement ceiling height different from the building code wasn't a good idea. Vice Chair Staunton said he would be reluctant to establish a hard and fast basement ceiling height minimum in the CUP. He reiterated building code stipulates a minimum basement ceiling height of 7 -feet, adding that's a starting point; however establishing a hard number in the zoning code for these cases would be difficult. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out that stipulation #4 "An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in height, mass and scale" , adding this is a good way to measure outcome. Schroeder acknowledged that the City consistently struggles with defining mass, adding in his opinion the answer should be to review each request on a case by case basis. Continuing, Schroeder said the applicant needs to demonstrate the need for a dwelling to exceed the first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building, pointing out that this too is a relatively new ordinance enacted to control building height. Schroeder said with the CUP option the City has recognized that in certain cases our ordinances cannot be met, reiterating reviewing this on a case by case basis in his opinion is best. Schroeder also pointed out with this application the applicant has demonstrated building height and mass, the applicant has indicated that this is a neighborhood in transition with a wide variety of housing types and the applicant has documentation confirming conditions #2 and #4 of the CUP. Commissioner Scherer reiterated her only comment was that the basement ceiling height doesn't have to be over 7 -feet; adding she recognizes 7 -foot ceilings aren't the norm in new construction. Scherer said raising the first floor building elevation to accommodate a taller basement ceiling is something she considered. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval based on staff findings, staff conditions, discussion, and public testimony. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Page 5 of 7 Vice Chair Staunton acknowledged the following e-mail that were present to the Commission June 13th: • 5521 Dever Drive • 5528 Woodcrest Drive • 5501Oaklawn • 5600 Woodcrest Drive All voted aye; motion carried. D. Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home one -foot above the first floor elevation of the existing home at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road for Doug and Abby Power. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker told the Commission Doug and Abby Power, are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to tear down an existing house and construct a new home at 4805 East Sunnyslope. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The applicant is proposing to raise the first floor elevation 4.68 feet above the existing first floor elevation. The existing first floor is at 895.91 feet with an allowed increase in height by code to 896.91 feet. The proposed first floor will be at a height of 900.58 feet. The property is a penninsula backing up to Minnehaha Creek and falls within the 1% annual chance of flooding.. The flood protection elevation along that portion of the creek is at 888.1 feet. The ordinance requires that all basement/lowest floors be elevated to a minimum 2 feet above the flood protection elevation. The existing basement elevation of the home is at 887 or 1.1 feet below the flood protection elevation. The proponents are proposing a basement elevation of 890.1 to comply with the minimum floodplain requirements. The ordinance allows the first floor to be raised by one foot or to an elevation of 896.91 feet. The low floor must be no lower than two feet above 888.1, which would result in a 6' 10" height difference between the basement floor and the first floor. Modern building practices generally include 18" floor trusses resulting in a basement ceiling height of 5' 4" without the benefit of a Conditional Use Permit. The builder has provided examples of other homes they have built within Edina. The home is designed similar in style to 5200 Mirror Lakes Drive, 4600 Woodland Road and 4617 Tower Street. Page 6 of 7 Me ay eIA �s Originator Meeting Date Agenda # VLC Cary Teague _ June 13, 2012 Planning Director Recommended Action: Approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow the new first floor elevation of a. home to exceed the 1 foot maximum increase allowed. by ordinance. Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit request to allow the first floor elevation of a new home to be 3.75 feet higher than the existing first floor of the home to be replaced, (2.75 feet higher than allowed by ordinance), due to ground water issues, at 5537 Park Place. INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Property owner Kate Schmitt, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home at 5537 Park Place. (See site location photos of the subject properly and adjacent homes on pages Al A6.) A Conditional Use Permit is being requested to allow_ the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the previous home by more than one foot. Specifically the applicant would like to raise the first floor elevation 3.75 feet above the first floor elevation of the previous home that had occupied the site. The first floor of the previous home was at 865.3 feet. The new first floor is proposed to be at 869.05 feet. The maximum allowed increase without a Conditional Use Permit is 866.3 feet .(See applicant narrative and plans on pages A7 -A17.) The new first floor Js proposed to be 2.75 feet over the one foot allowed by city code in order to reasonably protect the lower level of the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The attached Report of Geotechnical Exploration and letter dated May 1, 2012, from ITCO Allied Engineering Co., regarding ground water levels indicates ground water at a level of 855.29 with a recommended lowest floor elevation of 859.29, (see letter and report: pages A18 -A33). 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The proposal for a rebuild of a new single - family home would not have an . impact on governmental facilities or services. A single - family home is a permitted use on the site. 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; The proposal to rebuild a single - family home would not have an impact on traffic or the capacity of the streets serving the property. The use, a single - family home, remains the same on the property. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; Again there would be no impact, as the use of the property remains the same. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The proposed new home would fit the character of the existing neighborhood. The proposed new home is two stories and there are a number of two story homes within the neighborhood, (See home comparisons on pages A —A.) 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and The new home would meet all applicable zoning ordinance requirements. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. A single - family home is consistent with the low- density residential land use designation within the Comprehensive Plan. Additional Conditions Per Section 350.11. Subd. 2: Additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions to or replacements of single dwelling unit buildings must meet one or more of the first three (3) conditions listed below, and always meet condition four (4). 3 PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue o Is the proposed new home with a first floor elevation 3.75 feet higher than the existing home reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated on pages 3 -4 of this report, the findings and conditions required for this conditional use permit would be met. 2. As demonstrated on the Compliance Table on page 4 of this report, the proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. 3. Because of ground water issues, the basement of the.new home must be elevated to a minimum recommended height of 859.3. The new first floor height will be at 869.05, the basement providing 8.75 foot ceiling heights. A basement with an 8.75 foot ceiling is considered reasonable within the City. 4. The proposed new home is in character within this neighborhood. The home is similar to other two story homes constructed within the general area. 5 City Standard Proposed Front — Match neighbor 30 feet 30 feet Side street - South 15 feet 18 feet Side —North 5.6 (living space) 5 feet (garage) 9.33. feet Rear—. 25febt 25 feet Building Coverage 25% 25% Building. Height 35 feet 30feet PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue o Is the proposed new home with a first floor elevation 3.75 feet higher than the existing home reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated on pages 3 -4 of this report, the findings and conditions required for this conditional use permit would be met. 2. As demonstrated on the Compliance Table on page 4 of this report, the proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. 3. Because of ground water issues, the basement of the.new home must be elevated to a minimum recommended height of 859.3. The new first floor height will be at 869.05, the basement providing 8.75 foot ceiling heights. A basement with an 8.75 foot ceiling is considered reasonable within the City. 4. The proposed new home is in character within this neighborhood. The home is similar to other two story homes constructed within the general area. 5 CONDD MOO NAL USE pERNT APPMAMN t r1-�D�ti \006 CASE NUMBED ®ATE �. FEE PAID City of Edina Planning Department * www.cigyofedina.com 4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 926 -0369 * fax (952) 626 -0389 .................................. ......................... ----------------------------------------------------------------- FEE: $800.00 APPLICANT: / NAME: ��M& 5C 4 M; (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: 573; - Y1 09cm4t Mice— PHONE: G / 2 - -YO ° / LIU? :N(aaL44 'p,;l.Cv PROPERTY OWNER: NAME: 1` aj� (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: T'y- d -7 Pad Pr ^GC✓ PHONE: 6 l L -7 .70 — LEGAL DESCRIPTION OIF=PROPERTY (written and el ctronii�c form): % n -- (.1 R 1 r\ r ,% 1P 1, r. I r, b! ; Aw / [), I- a b - PROPERTY ADDRE : laCt S-5- 77 CA R, PRESENT ZONING: 12- 1 P.I.D.# LAVATION OF &V/ /,e/1 Z L/s I- ^ 5-1A q /'C 0&0, (/,A: /- �w'ld ;A'y Iii T1�-} F1 a v v 1 e ✓ IrC, 410j,-C JAAtq �d �- (Use r verse s6 or a diti al pages if neces ry)se���/ ire + e e� s us : �� l �� .� !� VC ARCHITECT: NAME: IWs /f e- rA Ate oLi'A PHONE: 9S-Z ® 9Y-70 - 9 -73-T-1 EMAIL: �? � Gt ym' S�'tvrs� i �P S')�o'7 . C.0 &I, SURVEYOR: NAME: 6-oh beg-9 PHONE: 9r?- ° L'%3® Ll®L11 EMAIL: LOGISMap Output Page Site Location IMrrw OL'M OR 5500 5504 SSW 5512 5516 5520 5524 5528 5532 55M 5501 5500 5505 SSW 5605 SSW 5515 6512 5517 5516 5521 5520 $525 5521 5529 5528 5522 5522 ssn 5538 5525 5600 5601 5500 16 5601 5604 5605 3605 5604 567H�,W It 5601 5608 5611 9 60 30 5608 560 AHiJ 5604 5003 i' 5612 56x5 82 A 5612 5609 22 30 27 5616 56,15 5610 80 28 5517 24 sy„ 5088 5616 86 4s�ez1a �7KL' Cof-TC .!G'r'. a1N 5660 C 7d Site Location Ma v, PID: 1902824110055 Udl ' .a, • 5537 Park PI"r_S 0 , 4 Edina, MN 55424 �\ .r�� qa �� Page 1 of 2 Lcgend 5701 S.WO Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels • Sheri Name Labels 6301 CRY Limits 3501 Creeks Lek e Names Labe. Perks 5504 Pa rcels 5504 5043 0 ssD9 8307 3604 SSOD SSW 5513 5512 5509 5513 5516 5523 3577 5515 5521 5527 5520 ssll 5533 5524 72 5521 5537 5528 14 5525 5600 5601 5500 16 5601 5604 5605 3605 5604 567H�,W It 5601 5608 5611 9 60 30 5608 560 AHiJ 5604 5003 i' 5612 56x5 82 A 5612 5609 22 30 27 5616 56,15 5610 80 28 5517 24 sy„ 5088 5616 86 4s�ez1a �7KL' Cof-TC .!G'r'. a1N 5660 C 7d Site Location Ma v, PID: 1902824110055 Udl ' .a, • 5537 Park PI"r_S 0 , 4 Edina, MN 55424 �\ .r�� qa �� Page 1 of 2 Property I Assessing I 14,1 Arr.TM4 /imc9RervireN2me =ed LOGISMaD OVSDE &ClientVe... 6/6/2012 Lcgend Highlighted Tretune Surrounding House Number Labels House Number Labels Sheri Name Labels ./ CRY Limits Creeks Lek e Names Labe. Perks Pa rcels Property I Assessing I 14,1 Arr.TM4 /imc9RervireN2me =ed LOGISMaD OVSDE &ClientVe... 6/6/2012 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of I Jk ��SG;+, � ' :L �.' r.'•, �u Tom. A Y ���: • �aF' ark .. ... l '� ■ ,dcf`s � �..t r � t i Mac R it ' ar �.il - 7,' a o t`7 7rJV lie 1 • { }� a . �qry �o i' 4, 1. iR y r i �fi //q. httn:Hvis.loais.orv-/LOGIS ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceNalne =ed LOGISMap_OVSDE &ClientVe... 6/6/2012 Page 1 of 1 X, 5- fl1r.- iPd_ „tt ��;t<, �x,; �P/ P11RT,,, aQP� /Phnt�s/1902924110054001.iDQ 6/6/2012 5537 Park Place Conditional Use Permit Application We are proposing building a new home at 5537 Park Place with a new floor 3.75 feet above the floor height of the. previous home (that has since been demolished). This new floor is being built 2.75 feet over the one foot allowed by city code in order to reasonably protect the lower level of the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The attached documentation fiom ITCO Allied Engineering Company shows the groundwater level at 855.29 and the recommended lowest floor elevation height of 559.29. All other dimensions of the new home will meet Edina's zoning rules and the home is designed to fit the character of the neighborhood in height, mass, and scale. The home exterior will feature stone details facing 56 '1' Street, cedar shingle siding, and an asphalt roof. These are materials that blend in with the character of homes in Colonial Grove and South Harriet Park. .` Z `7 60 89,52, CERTWIGATE lJF S.URVEY OF LOT 4, BLOCK 8, QOLONTAL G$-GVE THTRI) A= 11TION' HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EXISTING FLOOR t- (866A) 130.00 w 5ES, Is d%'Oudlas, . vwt-no q'* =4 g O r t4 —.w;, .—ra cow. *C:m .0, AF .. R.A,miWs;sn move R=2fji.'00EX1T NSi �A=g *19 , ui r 6 Z4"-- A=9 '00'QO"%--W 1.53. sum --62 L=31.42!W%W B73 II cmcmm AFROO /V 6a.. i, o sWEST5 716-TR ST s -10 0 10 20 30 le'Z S C A L E IN F E E: T I h.'dw eu=l p, RONBERG & ASSOCIATES., INC. -id- I w i-6. 0' CT .. �W A Oi d.Ld 5 w N k.. r th. Stp .1 '�Z t& NE CONSULTING WGINEIMS, LAND 3YOR3, & =- PLAN RS SURVI 445 NORTH WILLOW DM LONG LAM La 55356 .3-4141 7n -9 952-47 uoh s. c.m " 1&—la Uc— N v 12755 11-2388 ............. ...... '12 CERTWIGATE lJF S.URVEY OF LOT 4, BLOCK 8, QOLONTAL G$-GVE THTRI) A= 11TION' HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EXISTING FLOOR t- (866A) 130.00 w 5ES, Is d%'Oudlas, . vwt-no q'* =4 g O r t4 —.w;, .—ra cow. *C:m .0, AF .. R.A,miWs;sn move R=2fji.'00EX1T NSi �A=g *19 , ui r 6 Z4"-- A=9 '00'QO"%--W 1.53. sum --62 L=31.42!W%W B73 II cmcmm AFROO /V 6a.. i, o sWEST5 716-TR ST s -10 0 10 20 30 le'Z S C A L E IN F E E: T I h.'dw eu=l p, RONBERG & ASSOCIATES., INC. -id- I w i-6. 0' CT .. �W A Oi d.Ld 5 w N k.. r th. Stp .1 '�Z t& NE CONSULTING WGINEIMS, LAND 3YOR3, & =- PLAN RS SURVI 445 NORTH WILLOW DM LONG LAM La 55356 .3-4141 7n -9 952-47 uoh s. c.m " 1&—la Uc— N v 12755 11-2388 Wt. i9 r•r CL Imo. .. - Ada? -:s�� y � -�� _ - ' a= � �" a= • �c�►'Q i y -°''" fan Z. � 4 vP "� '� ✓_' 'r 6'J Ta � _ R ei� _ � P� :._. =F •oriYy p � . — I 11 al S ZZ yl -o PL ry ... - J.�. -r, 0.6. gF �1F►.U�-i�6n - - - - - -- .... ._.._.__._ .. .. .. --, �._ -`k 2rC Iz fz�,/� M-t� �y?5rv_.9>~ ' MPS ���AN &6.= `1% .. - ! u • • may'— �I' , r% w bw _ O i - WITFh7N1P6tfPly — I - - -- • - ' .'- 16 a P j I s. G . :, �. O j • �•`�` •.,'� fin-. 5 /..r� � ... . tip r�e�l,�—f, •>l.f:- !�I+- S.Jyi-l�o� . aM� � ��i�i :rte- .>�.,G -• -- ' ,`NGc,,s �� /A.? <- _t-ravl -3ZF-19. 1101 • � �x ' . FOP ��1�� -. .-- �jaQCI- Y�'/��J'I� � oo-�-�.'' �- ol'rT� �'c3T- i��5:•..�5 � - -- � � - - • rnl 05 � I � . ,9 �r �r t s Report of Geotechnical Exploration 5537 Park Place Edina, Minnesota April 16, 2 012 Allied Project 12014 ITC® Allied" Engineering Company 7125 West 126th Street, Suite 500 Savage, Minnesota 55378 �4 ,'4: Ph: 952 -890 -5909 Fax: 952 - 890 -5883 FIELD EXPLORATION Two Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings were each put down to a depth of 25 feet. The borings. were put down in accordance with ASTM 1586 -84: "Standard Method for Penetration Test and Split - Barrel Sampling of Soils" . Using this procedure, a 2" O.D. split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 =1b weight falling a distance of 30 inches. After an initial set of 67, the number of blows required to drive the sampler an additional 12 inches is known as the standard penetration resistance or N- value. The 1V- value provides an indication of the relative density of cohesionless (coarse grained) soils or of the consistency of cohesive (fine grained) soils. As the samples were obtained in field, they were visually and manually classified. Representative portions of the samples were then sealed in clean glass soil jars and returned to the laboratory for further examination and verification of the field classification. The recovered soil samples were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, ASTM D: 2488 -8. Logs of the test borings indicating the depth and identification of the various strata, measured penetration resistances, soil classifications and the results of water level checks are included in this report. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soil boring 1 Soil boring 1 consisted of 6 inches of clay, underlaid by organic clay to 8 feet of depth, clay to 10 feet of depth, sandy clay to at least 16.5 feet of depth, sand with some gravel from at least 20 feet to at least 21.5 feet of depth, and very fine sand with silt from at least 25 feet to 26.5 feet of depth. Soil Boring 2 Soil boring 2 consisted of 2 inches of organic clay, underlaid by sandy clay to 3.3 feet of depth, organic clay to, 7.8 feet of depth, sand with clay to 10.25 feet of depth, sandy silty clay to 12.5 feet of depth, sandy clay to at least 14 feet of depth, fine sand from at least 15 feet to 15.8 feet of depth, sandy clay to at least 16.5 feet of depth, fine sand from at least 17.5 feet to at least 19 feet of depth, sand from at least 20 feet to 26.2 feet of depth, and very fine sand with siltttt� .5 feet of depth. 6 v:0 �� The non -root infested and inorganic on -site soils would generally be suitable for reuse as controlled and compacted fill material. The topsoil, or other materials, which would not be suitable for use as controlled fill, may be able to be used as surface fill in the lawn and landscaping areas. Additional recommendations are presented in the following sections. The Department of Housing & Urban Development (D -HUD), which underwrites F.H.A. mortgages, requires a separation of 4.0 feet between the highest observed groundwater elevation and the lowest basement slab. Although this may or may not be a requirement in Edina, the city should be contacted to determine their requirements. 1. EXCAVATION. In general, grubbing and stripping operations should remove all significantly organic or root infested soils from the areas to be worked. Frozen material, soft consistency clays, or otherwise unsuitable soil and debris should be removed. Where undocumented fill or otherwise unsuitable soils are exposed in the base of excavations which will support slabs or footings, these materials should also be removed. Frozen soils resulting from frost penetration may turn soft upon thawing and would need to be removed. For the support of fill sequences, slabs, or footings, it will be important to remove unsuitable soils or unconsolidated material prior to the placement of the controlled and compacted fill to make grade for concrete foundations and slabs. Once the organic topsoil layers and otherwise unsuitable materials have been removed, the completed excavations should be observed by an experienced soil engineer or technician and the conditions judged to be suitable prior to the placement of controlled and compacted fill to make grade for concrete footings or slabs. The following areas should be observed at the time of construction and removed and replaced as necessary to obtain suitable soil and adequate compaction of the soil for the proposed residential structure or other facilities. ON ,q Py 5 � 4 EL . /I. _building pad area. Required compaction should be increased to 98% for fill areas 4 feet and deeper below final grade and below all footings. A minimum of one representative field density test should be performed for each two feet of fill placed at a time in a given work area. Density tests in mass fill areas should be performed at. a rate judged sufficient to represent the fill sequence as a whole. Where sand fills are to be compacted, smooth "drum" type vibratory equipment would be preferred, however, a sheepsfoot roller with short wide pads may provide adequate compaction. Fill areas should be properly oversized to provide for adequate distribution of the imposed loads. The fill supporting structural elements should extend at least one foot horizontally beyond the structure, slab or edge of the footing. Fill surfaces should extend downward and outward on a 1:1 slope to competent soil. If the fill.slope is unconfined by other soils, the downward and outward slope should be flattened and stabilized. Also, no unremedied excavations should be carried out within the fill oversize areas. 4. FOUNDATION DRAINAGE. If a below grade slab is to be included, foundation drains should also be included and the requirements in the next paragraph followed. In planning, backfill zone drain tile installation, the invert elevation should be below the level of the lowest floor slab. The drain line should be adequately protected from blockage prior to backfilling by a suitable encapsulation of gravel, (such as Mn/Dot spec 3149.2 H; "coarse filter aggregate "), and geotextile separation fabric. In the backfill zones above the drain tile the use of granular material is recommended. Sand for this purpose should contain less than 12% passing the number 200 sieve, (MnDot "select granular borrow spec 3149.2 B). Care should be taken during the backfilling operations to ensure that the drainage materials are not crushed or deformed. Fill installation in these areas should-be initiated with a two -foot lift of the granular backfill. A two to three foot thick compacted clay cap, with a positive. slope away from the structure, may be placed at the top of the backfill zone to aid in reducing the infiltration of groundwater into this area which would need to be. carried by the drain tile system. It should be noted that the construction of the backfill zone drainagett system should be performed with the same level of care as the foundation wall itself.,ti��, \ti n �� ALLIED TEST DRILLING COMPANY 04112/2012 04/12/2012 KIU Craig CME -55 PROJECT: NUMBER: 12014 5537 Park Place PAGE 1 OF 1 SURFACE ELEVATION LOG OF BORING LLu Cn CL p 96.8, SB #2 TEST LL 'z v RESULTS STANDARD PENETRATION _ aa.. ca- DESCRIPTION ANDL AND m TEST DATA ►- CL a mod. w CLASSIFATION IC OTHER (blows/foot) o U' OF MATERIALS REMARKS z co 5 . 10 20 ao 70 2" BLACK SANDY ORGANIC CLAY OL 1 SS BROWN SANDY CLAY, CL 4 2.0 2 SS 8 BLACK ORGANIC CLAY, OL 4.0 3 SS 6.0 .e• 8 i i i i i iii i 8.0 4 SS WET BROWN /GREY SAND W /CLAY, 5 SW -SC 10. 0.25 WET GREY SANDY SILTY CLAY, CL 7 5 SS 12.0- z5 MOIST GREY SANDY CLAY, CL 6 SS 8 . 4 82 WET BROWN FINE SAND, SP 16. SS 65 WET BROWN SANDY CLAY, CL 80. WET BROWN FINE SAND, SP 18.0 8' 33 w /2" layer of sandy clay in the middle 77. g s 20. WET BROWN SAND, SW �. 9 SS 9 22.0 � 24.0- i SS 12,x° 26. 10 6.2 �o. ��� J� ' WET GREY VERY FINE SAND W /SILT, 4v <� " " SP -SM � 26.0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _I_ _ _ L _ L J J J 1 1. WATER -LEVEL CHECKS METHOD SPT DATE TIME SAMPLED TO CASING CAVE -IN WATER 04112/2012 10:00 1 26.5' 25' 11.5' 8.3' 04112/2012 04/12/2012 KIU Craig CME -55 r%j.�LoA8�js a a i✓i%aa..swala%r �.l�Iwgrt�tV g SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS SYSTEMS Unified Soil Classification ASTM: D. 2488 - 84 • Group faction Fassing No 40: Major Divisions Symbol Typical Group Names COARSE- GRAVELS Clean Gravels GW Well graded gravels: Well graded gravel with sand. ° GRAINED SOILS <5% passing llrn lltttin st:a1 Types of ° More than 50 %6 No. 200 sieve GP Poorly- graded gravel. Poorly graded gravel with sand ". More than 50% retained on the of coarse fraction retained Gravel w/ fines GM' Silty gravel. Silty gravel with sand ". No. 300 sieve. on No. 4 sieve. > 15 % passing No.. 3p0. sieve GC Clayey gravel. Clayey gravel with sand". unsati9factor3 SANDS Clean Sands SW: Well graded sand. Well graded sand with gravel —. <5% passing 50% or more of No. *200 sieve SP Poorly graded sand., Poorly graded sand with gravef°. coarse fraction passes No. 4 Sands -Mth 11nes SM Silty sand, Silty sand with gravel —. sieve. >.15 %6 passing No. 20 sieve SC Clayey sand, Clayey sand with gravel—. �. FINE G)YAtNED SILTS AND CLAYS ML °. Silt, Silt with sand, Sandy silt''. SOUS I Liquid Limit less than 50. I CL Lean clay. Lean clay with sand'. Sandy lean claw''. Cohesive soils OL Organic silt. Organic clay. 503'0 of more I SILTS AND CLAYS MH Elastic silt. Elastic silt with sand'. Sandv elastic silt". passes the No 100 sieve. Liquid Limit more than 50 CH Fat clay, Fat clay with sand #. Sandy fat clay". - OH Organic clay. Organic silt. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS I P't• Peat. j 3oundary ziassificadons are designated by dual group symbois. For example (SP -SC). Poorly graded sand with ciay. are .han.15%a sand. °' - More than 15.176 sand. I - 15% to 30% retained an No 200 Sieve, ## - More than 30% retained on No 200 sieve eve Analysis: Passing No. 10. No. 40 No. 200 AASHTO Soil Classification System Granular Materials Silt- (35 % or less passing No. 200 sieve) (a35F A -I A -3 A -2 A r( -I-& A -1-b A -2-4 A-2-5 A -2-6 A -2 -7 -77 50 max I I , 30 max 50 fnax 51 rain ax 15 max 25 m 10 max 3Sntax 35max Wig No 2 1. 35max 136min 136min 136min IC hatacreristics of I faction Fassing No 40: liquid ]unit 40ntax 41 min 60max - 41max 40max 4ltnin 40max 41max 110maxi,10max plasticity iade:t 6 max NP lOmax lOtnax llmin litnin llrn lltttin st:a1 Types of stone fragments' fine peat, highly ignificant Constituents gravel and sand sand silty or clayey gravel and sand silty soils clayey soils organic soils e�sctaI Subgrade pag . ', ° • excellent; to. good ' :. fair to poor unsati9factor3 Page 1 of 2 Date: February 07, 2012 Case No.: 12- 05 -2142A LOMR -F OF'pp� \E'.`. r Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 AND SEA LETTER OF MAP REVISION EASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT REMOVAL COMMUNITY AND MAP PANEL INFORMATION LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN Lot 4, Block 8, Colonial Grove Third Addition, as shown on the Plat COUNTY, MINNESOTA Map, recorded as Document No. 319068, in Book 17, Page 14, in the Office of the County Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NO.: 270160 NUMBER: 27053CO364E AFFECTED MAP PANEL DATE: 912/2004 FLOODING SOURCE: MINNEHAHA CREEK APPROXIMATE LATITUDE 8, LONGITUDE OF PROPERTY: 44.902, - 93.334 SOURCE OF LAT 8, LONG: STREETS & TRIPS 2009 DATUM: WGS 84 DETERMINATION OUTCOME 1 %ANNUAL LOWEST LOWEST WHAT IS CHANCE ADJACENT LOT LOT BLOCK/ SUBDIVISION STREET REMOVED FROM FLOOD FLOOD GRADE ELEVATION SECTION THE SFHA ZONE ELEVATION ELEVATION (NGVD 7Q) (NGVD 29 ) (NGVD 29 4 8 Colonial Grove 5537 Park Place X 862.5 feet -- 863.0 tee. Third Addition Li (shaded) Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) - The SFHA is an area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1- percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any qiven year (base flood). ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS (Please refer to the appropriate section on Attachment 1 for the additional considerations listed below.) STUDY UNDERWAY STATE LOCAL CONSIDERATIONS This document provides the Federal Emergency Management Agency's determination regarding a request for a Letter of Map Revision based on Fill for the property described above. Using the information submitted and the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map, we have determined that the property(ies) is /are not located in the SFHA, an area inundated by the flood having a 1- percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). This document revises the effective NFIP map to remove the subject property from the SFHA located on the effective NFIP map; therefore, the Federal mandatory flood insurance requirement does not apply. However, the lender has the option to continue the flood insurance requirement to protect its financial risk on the loan. A Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) is available for buildings located outside the SFHA. Information about the PRP and how one can apply is enclosed. This .determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336 -2627 (877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, LOMC Clearinghouse, 7390 Coca Cola Drive, Ste 204, Hanover, MD 21076. Luis Rodriguez, P.E., Chief Engineering Management Branch Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration 19 11; �- Page 2 of 2 Date: February 07,2012 No.: 12- 05 -2142A Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 FETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) ATTACHMENT 1 (ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) STUDY UNDERWAY (This Additional Consideration applies to all properties in the LOMB -F DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL)) This determination is based on the flood data presently available. However, the Federal Emergency. Management Agency is currently revising the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map for the community. New flood data could be generated that may affect this property. When the new NFIP map is issued it will supersede this determination. The Federal requirement for the purchase of flood insurance will then be based on the newly revised NFIP map. STATE AND LOCAL CONSIDERATIONS (This Additional Consideration applies to all properties in the LOMR -F DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL)) Please note that this document does not override or supersede any State or local procedural or substantive provisions which may apply to floodplain management requirements associated with amendments to State or local floodplain zoning ordinances, maps, or State or local procedures adopted under the National Flood Insurance Program. LOMR -F nis attachment provides additional information regarding this request. If you have . any questions about this attachment, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336 -2627 (877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Managemen, Agency, LOMC Clearinghouse, 7390 Coca Cola Drive, Ste 204, Hanover,, MID 21076. Luis Rodriguez, P.E., Chief Engineering Management Branch ✓ Federal Insurance. and -Mitigation Administration 8030 Ctdar Avenue South quite zzo Bloomington, MN 55425 Phone (9952) 854 -4055 Fax (952) 854 -4268 BROOKVIEW AVENUE: HOUSE #5508 = 35.3 FEET HOUSE #5533 = 34.5 FEET HOUSE #5532 = 30.2 FEET HOUSE #5605 = 36.1 FEET PARK PLACE: HOUSE #5600 = 28.4 FEET HOUSE #5536 = 29.9 FEET HOUSE #5601 = 28.2 FEET HOUSE #5605 = 29.0 FEET HOUSE #5604 = 19.8 FEET HOUSE #5532 = 18.0 FEET HOUSE #5528 = 14.9 FEET HOUSE #5533 = 23.3 FEET HOUSE #5527 = 22.3 FEET HOUSE #5520 = 31.6 FEET HOUSE #5524 = 18.2 FEET HOUSE #5508 = 16.3 FEET HOUSE #5504 = 36.0 FEET HOUSE #5500 = 37.1 FEET I 1• ING5 WC. WOODROW A. BROWN, R.L.S. President gurvey For: GRnT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES )ROOF PEAK HEIGHTS) WOODCREST DRIVE: HOUSE #5600 = 29.2 FEET HOUSE #5604 = 31.5 FEET HOUSE #5609 = 26.1 FEET HOUSE #5605 = 30.8 FEET HOUSE #5601 = 23.7 FEET HOUSE #5528 = 20.1 FEET HOUSE #5525 = 15.3 FEET HOUSE #5505 = 33.0 FEET HOUSE #5508 = 30.9 FEET HOUSE #5501 = 32.3 FEET 91 -12 122/73 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version wvAv.pjdffactorv.com /7 -7 /J 1 of 1 P 0 .. NL r �� — �.h. -..� -„4 . ay,:., . : �. -,y� }^ r.' r'.> ;� • ` ... �... #c�..J.... .,. .� ' •• jaw ��F��K('0"' -'hr • 3kt p,.r^ p WWWI-- 2 -SOP. qz; Vill Ali 4- WWWI-- 2 -SOP. qz; 5--617- 116 .rK 1' Lre 7 ��°� 5-572- Q—s Y- (5 ® �� V d +r*sk t� n , M- lima aa� f '• CA ME IH • ;iriiit'i = fi `i Aa 16-1 SAU QS } T A TM � j �' • .� s R no t y .y .A ! - :a } T A TM � j �' • .� s R no I� y dbs_�C�tI: ..Ja�•IaLwi✓lJCLi�QSili��A4.. ..'•,,,�•� "�a•`kr.+,. -. �ttS6`1 r Y �•'��t ��y 1at�,y�. ;=, xt. SAM j '"•• }:�.. +U ' JK Yhti H ' ^ "� rr�p^•�•i.ia; ,.,r 2 W. � �'�Twt Y�a''Y'wl+S i - 9`+t'.". �" rl ''��� - � � �' �. +.::: "' �•4t / .. ���'r lc titF. Jl y^tw... .t 'i.',h;R. n.. .I yy ..M .. - -- 7-7 I �mj 5-6 0 � W 0 d1c �Z5 /- yti �� ®'li moo cc-�,- b Ow Le ` 0 1 B REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VI.B. From: Cary Teague, Community ® Action Development Director Discussion El Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — To construct a new home one -foot above the first floor elevation of the exiting home at 4805 East Sunnyslope from Doug and Abby Power, Resolution No. 2012 -85 Deadline July 14, 2012 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution No. 2012 -85 approving the Conditional Use Permit. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The applicants are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to tear down an existing house and construct a new home at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road, to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The applicant is proposing to raise the first floor elevation 4.68 feet above the existing first floor elevation. (See attached Planning Commission staff report for the complete details on the request.) Planning Commission Review: On June 13, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit. Vote: 6 Ayes and 1 Nay. (See the attached minutes.) The Planning Commission added the following conditions that have been included in the attached Resolution: The new building plans and elevations submitted at the Planning Commission meeting on June 13, 2012 be entered into the record. 2. The city engineer shall review the proposed grading and drainage plan and make recommendation prior to the City Council meeting. The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and has submitted the attached memo. ATTACHMENTS: • Memo from the city engineer dated June 14, 2012 • Building elevations submitted at the Planning Commission meeting on June 13, 2012. • Resolution No. 2012 -85 approving the Conditional Use Permit • Planning Commission Staff Report, June 13, 2012 • Draft minutes from the June 13, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting Jackie Hoogenakker .rom: Kathy Bailey <kbailey924 @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 1:42 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: re: conditional use permit for 4805 E Sunnyslope Rd Hello last week I faxed our approval of case file 2012.006.12a. Since then, we have seen the drawing for the new home and we do NOT approve any longer for the permit as it exists. We disaprove of the 5 foot wall for an auto court that is 5 feet from the property line of the existing neighbor. Please add this to your list of neighbor's viewpoints that are within 1000 feet of 4805 East Sunnyslope Road. Thank you, William and Katharine Bailey 4808 E Sunnyslope Road Edina, MN 55424 • V1• Jackie Hoogenakker From: James Fricton <frict001 @umn.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:48 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Re: The propsed home at 4805 E. Sunnyslope. Dear Ms. Hoogenakker; have discussed this proposed home with several members of our Sunnyslope neighborhood. Some of us were not able to attend the meeting last week but have concerns. We recognize that the proposed plan is for a 1.5 story, 6,000 square foot house. It's a beautiful house and we welcome the our new neighbors with open arms. We are a very friendly neighborhood with regular gatherings and community projects. They are also friends of current neighbors and thus, we consider it a delicate situation. We do not want to offend anyone. However, we are concerned with the 1,200 square foot elevated auto court. This auto court leaves no space for what makes our community so special - the private feel to our backyards, the graceful flow of the land between houses, the spacious sense, the view of the creek, and the soft natural screening between our homes. The raised concrete auto court would be approximately 5 feet above the current grade and be about 5 feet from the neighbor's property line. It essentially blocks the view of the creek for both those walking on the street and those in the house next door. It also prevents green spaces between houses. This is an important issue since we do not want the crowded feeling of the country club area just east of us. We are surprised that the proposal adds the expense of a raised auto court when it could easily turn the garage doors to the street and allow the driveway to go directly into the garage from the street and give plenty of room and not crowd the lots. We are hopeful that compromise can be reached that would give the new home owners what they want without changing the feel of our neighborhood. Thank you. Sincerely, Dr. James Fricton frict001Ca)-umn.edu Home Owner in Sunnyslope N Jackie Hoogenakker From: Becky O'Grady <Becky.OGrady @genmills.com> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:10 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Shawn O'Grady Subject: RE: Case File 2012.006.12a - Doug & Abby Power Sunnyslope House Project I should add — we live at 4907 East Sunnyslope Road. Thanks- Becky From: Becky O'Grady Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:08 AM To: 'jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us' Cc: Shawn O'Grady Subject: Case File 2012.006.12a - Doug & Abby Power Sunnyslope House Project Unfortunately we are travelling and cannot attend the Edina Planning Commission or City Council meetings, but we wanted to express our strong support for the Power's house project at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road. We think it will be a dramatic improvement to the neighborhood. We very much appreciate the way that they have thoughtfully and purposefully solicited neighborhood input and feedback. They are a wonderful couple and their family will be a welcomed addition to our neighborhood and the broader Edina community. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. Best regards, Becky & Shawn O'Grady Vice Chair Staunton ackno dged the Commission June 13th: / • 5521 Dever Drive 5528 Woodcrest Drive • 5501Oaklawn • 5600 Woodcrest ve All voted aye; motion carried. owing e-mail that were present to the D. Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home one -foot above the first floor elevation of the existing home at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road for Doug and Abby Power. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker told the Commission Doug and Abby Power, are requesting a . Conditional Use Permit to tear down an existing house and construct a new home at 4805 East Sunnyslope. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The applicant is proposing to raise the first floor elevation 4.68 feet above the existing first floor elevation. The existing first floor is at 895.91 feet with an allowed increase in height by code to 896.91 feet. The proposed first floor.will be at a height of 900.58 feet. The property is a penninsula backing up to Minnehaha Creek and falls within the 1 % annual chance of flooding.. The flood protection elevation along that portion of the creek is at 888.1 feet. The ordinance requires that all basement/lowest floors be elevated to a minimum 2 feet above the flood protection elevation. The existing basement elevation of the home is at 887 or 1.1 feet- below the flood protection elevation. The proponents are proposing a basement elevation of'890.1 to comply with the minimum floodplain requirements. The ordinance allows the -first floor to be raised by one foot or to an elevation of 896.91 feet. The, low floor must be no lower than two feet above 888. 1, which would result in a 6' 10 height difference between the basement floor and the first floor. Modern building. practices generally include 1'8" floor trusses resulting in a basement ceiling height of 5' 4" without the benefit of a Conditional .Use Permit. The builder has provided examples of other homes they have built within Edina. The home is designed similar in style to 5200 Mirror Lakes Drive, 4600 Woodland Road and 4617 Tower Street. .Page 6 of 10 Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for Doug and Abby Power for property located at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road. The Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation 3.67 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing home. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: Survey date stamped May 14, 2012. Building plans and elevations date stamped May 14, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Appearing for the Applicant Doug and Abby Power, applicants, Charles Mooty, property owner, Nate Wissink, Elevation Homes. Applicant Presentation Mr. Power introduced himself to the Commission informing them that at the present time he and his family were renting a home on Drexel Avenue while they go through the Conditional Use Permit and building permit process. Power said he was very excited to build a new house in Edina. Mr. Wissink addressed the Commission and highlighted aspects of the Conditional Use Permit. Wissink explained that given that the subject property is in the flood plain Condition 1 was addressed allowing the lower level floor to be two (2) feet above the flood plain elevation. Wissink said the applicant is proposed a basement elevation of 890.1 to comply with the minimum floodplain requirements. Continuing, Wissink informed the Commission the Sunnyslope neighborhood is characterized by hilly Page 7 of 10 topography, large home site and a variety of architectural styles of home ranging from ramblers to'h story home and full two story homes. Wissink pointed out the design of the proposed home is a double gable, 1.5 story home with walkout lower level. Discussion /comments Vice Chair Staunton asked what the elevation is along this portion of the creek. Wissink responded it is roughly 881.1 feet. Staunton said if he understands the request correctly the "new" basement elevation as proposed is 890.1 feet which appears high. Wissink said modern building practices tend to include 18" floor trusses and when you add the floor material dimensions etc. height is increased. Commissioner Forrest commented that in her opinion if she understands the plans correctly that the property owner to the northwest will be impacted by the proposed grade changes, retaining wall and site lines. Mr. Wissink agreed adding they are working very closely with the neighbor to the north to mitigate any issues they may have. Vice -Chair Staunton opened the public hearing Public Comment Roxane Lehmann 4801 E Sunnyslope Road told the Commission she was the immediate neighbor to the northwest. Lehmann said she really likes the applicants but does have concerns; especially with the auto court. Lehmann said the auto court is very close to the common property line. She acknowledged she has been working closely with the applicants and their builder; however, she reiterated she has concerns about potential water issues from not only the creek but water run -off issues from the new house and auto court. Lehmann also pointed out 4805 is at a higher elevation and that the incline in this area between properties is apparent. Continuing, Lehmann reiterated she worries about already being in a 100 year flood plain and now is concerned that the adjacent property which is at a higher elevation has an auto court so close to the common line. Concluding, Lehmann said that aesthetically this is a lovey area with a very spacious feel between the homes will now be lost. The "feel' of the area will change. Vice -chair Staunton asked for clarification if 4805 is at a higher elevation then the neighboring property at 4801 Sunnyslope. Planner Teague clarified that 4805 is at a higher elevation. Vice -Chair closed asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Page 8of10 Continued Discussion /Comments Commissioner Fischer asked Commissioner Schroeder if in his opinion the drainage has been appropriately handled. Commissioner Schroeder said that it appears to him they are doing the right thing. Vice -Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify how drainage is addressed. Planner Teague explained when a building permit is applied for the City's Engineering Department reviews all plans with respect to drainage and drainage patterns. Teague said if he recalls the ordinance correctly new construction cannot negatively impact the present water flow by directing more water run -off onto adjoining properties. Continuing, Teague said he would ask City Engineer Houle to draft a memo reflecting his opinion on drainage for this property. Staunton said he recalls that the rate of water run -off on adjoining properties can't be increased. Teague agreed, adding usually with new construction measures are implemented that actually improve the drainage patterns. Commissioner Platteter acknowledged the grade change and swale to handle water run -off and asked Mr. Wissink if there are plans to landscape this area. It was acknowledged by the landscape architect that this area would be landscaped; probably with coniferous plantings, adding there is a "pinch point ", at the southwest corner where the drainage plan will be established, adding it's possible a French drain may be developed or a dry well system. Commissioner Schroeder noted that criteria #4 of the Conditional Use Permit deals with mass. Schroeder pointed out that building elevations were not provided for all elevations; especially from the creek. Schroeder said in his opinion not only is the street scape important but how the building looks from the public water ways was also important. Schroeder said without these elevations it is difficult to make an educated decision on mass. Commissioner Scherer agreed. She also noted the lots along Browndale and Sunnnyside Road on the other side of the creek will have a view of the proposed new house, adding she would also like to see this elevation. Planner Teague said he agreed, adding if the Commission wasn't comfortable in making a decision without those elevations they should continue this item to the next meeting of the Commission. Charles Mooty, property owner told the Commission in his opinion the houses on the opposite side of the creek are at a higher elevation than the subject site. Mooty said in his opinion, the house as proposed is a good house and this is a wonderful opportunity to upgrade this lot. Mr. Power said at this time they are renting their current home on Drexel and would like to have their house completed at the time their lease expires. Mrs. Power said that the Page 9 of 10 house plans before them will be built as indicated; however, with not owning the property all elevations haven't been completed. Mr. Wissink entered into the official record elevations of the proposed new house from the south, east, west (without garage) and north. Commissioner Schroeder said in his opinion these elevations can be accepted as an amendment to the packet. Schroeder said i.n his opinion the Commission can proceed on this request because relevant elevations have been received. Commissioner Forrest stated she is still concerned. She said in her opinion (even though the applicants and neighbor are working together) this new house creates a significant change; not only with drainage patterns but visually as well. Forrest said the auto court is very close; reiterating this will be a big change for the neighbor to the northwest. Commissioner Fischer said he agrees this is will a change; however, he noted that it is garage to garage. Not living space to garage. A discussion ensued on the Conditional Use Permit process with Commissioners acknowledging that this is a change for neighboring properties; however, the purview of the Commission is to determine if a Conditional Use Permit is warranted to elevate the house from the flood plain. It was pointed out that #1 was met and with the addition of building elevations #4 was met. Motion Commissioner Schroeder moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval based on the additional information that was provided to the Commission this evening and that the additional drawings provided to us tonight be submitted as part of the official public record. Recommended approval is also based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Schroeder, Platteter, Carpenter, Fischer, Staunton. Nay; Forrest. It was also suggested that before the meeting of the Edina city Council that the City engineer draft a memo indicating his opinions on the CUP. It was further suggested that the applicant continue to work with the neighbors to the west; Mr. and Mrs. Lehmann Page 10 of 10 0 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com p Pi 'Y1 Yom, 1 Date: June 14, 2012 To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne D. Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Review of 4805 Sunnyslope Road East Engineering is recommending the following design be incorporated into the final construction plans prior to issuance of a permit: • Revise the grading plan to incorporate a drainage swale within the property along the northwesterly property line. • Grade drainage swale to drain front area to Sunnyslope Road East and rear area to Minnehaha Creek. o An extension of the retaining wall to the southwest will be required to lessen the slope of the embankment from the driveway to the side property line. • Revise the driveway at the garage to drain pavement towards Minnehaha Creek. G: \PW \ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \S Streets \4805 Sunnyslope \20120614 WH to CT Review of 4805 Sunnyslope Road East.doc Engineering Department 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 . 1 RESOLUTION NO, 2012-85 APPROVING. A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 4805 EAST SUNNYSLOPE ROAD FOR DOUG AND ABBY POWER BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to tear down and construct a new home at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot., Specifically the applicant would like to raise the first floor elevation 4.68 feet above the existing first floor elevation. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A 1.03 On June 13, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit. Vote: 6 Ayes and 1 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The homes in the area have a variety of height, mass and scale. 4. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by .the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a new home at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped May 14, 2012. • Building plans and elevations date stamped May 14, 2012. • Building plans and elevations submitted at the Planning Commission meeting on June 13, 2012. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 y FAX 952 -826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET' TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -85 Page Two 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. The plans must include the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated June 14, 2012. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 19, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2012. City Clerk wgtN�tir� o e e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # VI.D Cary Teague June 13, 2011 Planning Director Recommended Action: Approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow the new first floor elevation of a home to exceed the 1 foot maximum increase allowed by ordinance. Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit request to allow the first floor elevation of a new home to be 4.68 feet higher than the existing first floor of the home to be replaced, (3.68 feet higher than allowed by ordinance), due to the floodplain elevation imposed on the property located at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road. INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Doug and Abby Power, are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to tear down an existing house and construct a new home at 4805 East Sunnyslope. (See site location on pages Al —A3.) A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The applicant is proposing to raise the first floor elevation 4.68 feet above the existing first floor elevation. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages:A4— Al2.). The existing first floor is at 895.91 feet with an allowed increase in height by code to. 896.91 feet. The proposed firstrfloor will be at a height of 900.58 feet: The property is a penninsula backing up to Minnehaha Creek and falls within the 1 % annual chance of flooding, (the 100 year flood,plain). The flood protection elevation along that portion of the creek is at 888.1 feet, (see floodplain documentation on pages A13 -A30) . The ordinance requires that all basement/lowest floors be elevated to a minimum 2 feet above the flood protection elevation. The existing basement elevation. of the home is at 887 or 1.1 feet below the flood protection elevation. The proponents are proposing a basement elevation of 890.1 to comply with the minimum floodplain requirements. The ordinance allows the first floor to be raised by one foot or to an elevation of 896.91 feet. The low floor must be no lower than two feet above 888. 1, which would result in a 6' 10" height difference between the basement floor and the first floor. Modern building practices generally include 18" floor trusses resulting in a basement ceiling height of 5'4" without the benefit of a Conditional Use Permit. The builder has provided examples of other homes they have built within Edina. The home is designed similar in style to 5200 Mirror Lakes Drive, 4600 Woodland Road and 4617 Tower Street, (see attached photos of similar projects by the applicant's builder on pages A31 -A43). Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single- family residential homes; zoned and guided low- density residential Easterly: Minnehaha Creek Southerly: Minnehaha Creek Westerly: Single- family residential homes; zoned and guided low- density residential The applicant has provided an inventory of homes within the neighborhood illustrating the variety of housing styles present and the diverse topography of lots within the vicinity, (see pages A44 -A76). The home has been designed as a 1.5 story walk -out with a connected link between the main house and the garage. The home complies with all of the zoning ordinance requirements even given the challenges of maintaining a 50 foot setback from the Creek edge and given that over -all height is measured and must be maintained from average existing grade even though the home is proposed to be elevated higher than the existing home. Existing Site Features The existing 37,556 square foot lot contains a rambler style single - family home built in 1953, and is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area for the Mill Pond of Minnehaha Creek as determined by FEMA. The existing basement is nonconforming and below the flood protection elevation. The property must maintain a minimum 50 foot setback from Minnehaha Creek with the south and east sides of the lot imposed with a 50 foot setback. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - Density Residential Zoning: R -1, Single - Dwelling. District OA { , Grading & Drainage Drainage patterns would generally remain the same. The grading must not impact adjacent neighbors. Final grading and drainage plan is subject to review and approval of the city engineer at the time of building permit application. The proposed plans will also require a review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 850.04 Subd. 5.E, the City Council shall not grant .a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, .maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact. on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The proposal for a tear down and rebuild of a new single- family home will not have an impact on governmental facilities or services. A single- family home is a permitted use on the site. 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; The proposal to tear down and rebuild a single-family, home would not have an impact on traffic or the capacity of the streets .serving the property. The use, a single- family home, remains the same on the property. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; There would be no impact, as the use of the property remains the same as exists today. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The proposed new home would.fit the character of the existing neighborhood. The proposed new home is a 1.5 story walk =out home. (See home on pages A8 —Al2.) 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and The new home would meet all applicable zoning ordinance requirements. 3 . 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. A single - family home is consistent with the low- density residential land use designation within the Comprehensive Plan. Additional Conditions Per Section 850.11. Subd. 2: Additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions to or replacements of single dwelling unit buildings must meet one or more of the first three (3) conditions listed below, and always meet condition four (4). 1. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), or the City's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan; or 2. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to reasonably protect the dwelling from ground water intrusion. Existing and potential ground water elevations shall be determined in accordance with accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering practices. Determinations shall be undertaken by a professional civil engineer licensed under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 326 or a hydrologist certified by the American Institute of Hydrology. Studies, analyses and computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow thorough review and approval; or 3. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to allow the new building to meet State Building Code, City of Edina Code, or other statutory requirements; and 4. An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in height, mass and scale. Conditions #1 and #4 above apply to the proposed new home. The subject property is located within the 100 -year flood elevation for the Mill Pond. The 100 -year flood elevation is 888.1. Structures must be at least two (2) feet above the established 100 -year flood elevation; therefore, the low floor elevation for the new home must be no lower than 890.1. The existing home has a low floor elevation of 887. The proposed new home would have a low floor elevation of 890.1. 2 The applicant would like the new home to have a nine (9) foot ceiling height in the basement. An eight to nine foot basement ceiling height within single - family homes in an Edina is typical, even though the minimum building code requirement is seven feet. Therefore, with the combination of the inability to go down lower to accomplish ceiling height in the basement and the requirement to raise the low floor elevation out of the flood zone will result in the new home being 4.68 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing home or 3.68 feet higher than allowed by ordinance. The proposed new home would fit the character of the neighborhood. (See pages A44 —A76, which shows existing homes in the area.) The proposed new home is 1.5 stories with an attached three car garage. Compliance Table Y 1� .: r�'d ^c� 1�K- e'u..r R.. P,c �.�r3' }7 ,. .,C Pry:_. ' 3ib �5 k C� tT1%JE'�� �ui'•$y�P ql' x4 GA ' M' 1 C-� F;rCY` ProTp'os ibz�'�tyStandha'{rd Front — East Sunnyslope 43.6 feet 46.8 feet Side -South Mill Pond 50 feet from creek 50 feet Rear— East Mill Pond 50 feet from creek 50 feet Side — North 10 feet 35.3 feet Building Coverage 25% 14.7% Building Height 40 feet/30 mid pt 39.08 feet/28.89 feet C PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposed new.home with a first floor elevation 4.68 feet higher than the existing home reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: E 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated on pages 3 -4 of this report, the findings and conditions required for this conditional use permit would be met. 2. As demonstrated on the Compliance Table on page 4 of this report, the proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. 3. Because of the 100 -year flood plain elevation for Minnehaha Creek, the applicant cannot dig down lower to build a basement with a nine foot ceiling, and meet the code requirement that the first floor elevation for the new home not exceed one foot above first floor elevation of the existing home. A basement with a nine foot ceiling is considered reasonable within the City. 4. The proposed home is in character within this neighborhood. There are a variety of housing styles throughout the area. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for Doug and Abby Power for property located at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road. The Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation 3.68 feet above the one foot first floor increase of the existing home. Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: Survey date stamped May 14, 2012. Building plans and elevations date stamped May 14, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Deadline_ for a city decision: July 14, 2012 �iA�� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ow�l-a��� APPLICATION lG tl- aae Z� CASE NUMBER _DATE 2O 2 FEE PAID City of Edina Planning Department * www.cityofedina.com 4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826 -0369 * fax (952) 826 -0389 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- FEE: $800.00 APPLICANT: NAME: DDU 6 -- AGM 'PDQFV- (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: 467-1> AV' m o E PHONE: 91'1-570q--72-10 EMAIL: Poo ra . PD%VEP— e 61 &t4 K t L-LS. eoF-k PROPERTY OWNER: NAME: CIiA+ -LES MooTY (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: TOM OM M60 -LIkN D M" JC PHONE: IDl 2 - 22o 9 61A j LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (written and electronic form): L d'I- 2 A-N D I�WT- PART OF DoT 1 aim f L -oc,r. 6 a 11 N N 1 sL-0 r G 5 L- C-In 6 N F Cd u N r --`i C--L- V R 61 S tiL 1 c- 50t / M A- r-ti- -U fbix- Fug-+- L��At✓ DEscA �PnoN. PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUWOq SLdf- P-OP D t.f -S-r PRESENT ZONING: P.I.D.# { 13 - 0 2 $ - 2,y _ Z2— 00S S' EXPLANATION OF REQUEST: (Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) ARCHITECT: NAME: r-44-L -1E S%Ik X00 S PHONE: ro51- 2(A `)410 EMAIL: C- 4*{LWE' Q 61V( P- -wC7AV 0 co pES( c,0- coAA SURVEYOR: NAME: I- "A-4vD PEA "Sots PHONE: q'5 Z- - Q�0 - 60i4 EMAIL: 4Fe- (-t�R -&OA 8 �R4 �J C. co-LI APPLICANT'S STATEMENT This application should be processed in my name, and I am the party whom the City should contact about this application. By signing this application, I certify that all fees, charges, utility bills, taxes, special assessments and other debts or obligations due to the City by me or for this property have been paid. I further certify rthat I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approvals that have been granted to me for any matter. have completed all of the applicabl7filinents and, to the best of my knowledge, the documents and information I have sand correct. Applii:a'nt's Signature Date OWNER'S STATEMENT am the fee title owner of the above described property, and I agree to this application. (If a corporation or partnership is the fee title holder, attach a resolution authorizing this applicatio ' n behalf of the board of di ctors or partnership.) Owner's Signature Date Note. Both signatures are required (if the owner is different than the applicant) before we can process the application, otherwise it is considered incomplete. rage i or 1 Metes and Bounds The following is the County Auditor's description of this tax parcel. It may not be the legal description on the most recent conveyance document recording ownership. Please refer to the legal description of this property on the public record when preparing legal documents for recording PID: 18- 028 -24 -22 -0085 Municipality: EDINA Addition Name: SUNNY SLOPE SECTION COUNTRY CLUB DIST Lot: . Block: 006 LOT 2 AND THAT PART OF LOT 1 LYING NLY OF A TINE RUNNING FROM A PT IN WLY LINE OF SAID LOT DIS 52 FT SLY MEAS ALONG WLY LINE OF SAID LOT FROM NW COR THEREOF TO A PT IN ELY LINE OF -SAID LOT 110 33/100 FT SLY MEAS ALONG ELY LINE OF SAID LOT FROM NE COR THEREOF' PW���G ��PA�i��►ENT MAY 14 ZOAZ C;0TY -fir Em A http: / /wwwl6.co.hennepin.mn.us /pins /pidresult jsp ?pid= 1802824220085 5/14/2012 t OGISMap Output Page Site Location Jj T9 4100 4171 0771 4775 1770 IJ7S s7 /1 d]7s 4771 4504 4101 4778 1379 4760 1370 _ _ .. 4424-- t 8 1778 d 45e8 4504 4500 — 382 4510 1405 31 W 4409 600 N1M 4501 4505 4509 4408 P406 /410 4(07 4500 4601 4504 4501 � 4701 4605 7370 4903 4901 4803 4801 (709 4706 4400 4405 24 1706 4704 4707 4700 4606 4601'4600 H02 W g08 RP 4501 4500 4800 Y 1901 1g00 IB06 484 IBOI SU 4500 4502 4904 1501 4503 1703 4500 4502 4707 4705 4701 4605 4507 4505 4501 o 21 4805 4601 4603 4601 4501 4501 4506 /908 4807 4507 4503 4901 - 4501 4508 4508 4509 4911 -- — _ 4507 4509 4903 1506 4511 0510 1916 � 1905 4800 _`` i m 4509 4510 4517 4920 4800 4801 `\ > 4117 4907 >` Th 4511 4512 4514 4808 _ , 4S03 �� 4515 4513 4514 4911 4801 4800 4909 =ie 4517 4516 __.� Is 15 4116 _..' .. 11 4812 c GRID [,857 4601 1600 4805 4518 4601 4600 4810 4804 4510 1607 4601 460] 4602 4809 0 4600 4605 4604 4824 4808 4605 4604 L 4602 4607 4606 4826 0877 418`13 46tl7 4606 > r 4817 4801 4800 404 4809 1608 4609 4608 4632 1671 4610 W 1901 4821 0808 4611 4610 12 0 4611 j�0¢t 4613 4611 4876 4616 46 }1 a 4610 4615 0614 4801 2 4905 / 4615 4611 � E � 4611 .(617 0617 4616 0611 4816 0900 Ar 1 WAS. IBOS 4904 4707 6.1 4619 4819 7901 0 4620 4618 4813 4618 4621 1900 4908 4909 0 4612 1624 0617 4620 1903 4901 4622 o — v Property PID:1802824220085 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 Assessing J r Page 1 of 2 4379 83 4378 4379 4360 370 -7 4382 4386 1387 4381 1383 4 Street Name Labels N City Limits r Creeks EjLake 78 46 4787 s38b 4387 777111 4786 6 A' 4 0 Parcels a > 4850 4390 m 4390 4389 4393 4390 4250 0394 4392 d 45e8 4504 4500 — 382 4510 1405 31 W 4409 600 N1M 4501 4505 4509 4408 P406 /410 4(07 4500 4601 4504 4501 � 4701 4605 7370 4903 4901 4803 4801 (709 4706 4400 4405 24 1706 4704 4707 4700 4606 4601'4600 H02 W g08 RP 4501 4500 4800 Y 1901 1g00 IB06 484 IBOI SU 4500 4502 4904 1501 4503 1703 4500 4502 4707 4705 4701 4605 4507 4505 4501 o 21 4805 4601 4603 4601 4501 4501 4506 /908 4807 4507 4503 4901 - 4501 4508 4508 4509 4911 -- — _ 4507 4509 4903 1506 4511 0510 1916 � 1905 4800 _`` i m 4509 4510 4517 4920 4800 4801 `\ > 4117 4907 >` Th 4511 4512 4514 4808 _ , 4S03 �� 4515 4513 4514 4911 4801 4800 4909 =ie 4517 4516 __.� Is 15 4116 _..' .. 11 4812 c GRID [,857 4601 1600 4805 4518 4601 4600 4810 4804 4510 1607 4601 460] 4602 4809 0 4600 4605 4604 4824 4808 4605 4604 L 4602 4607 4606 4826 0877 418`13 46tl7 4606 > r 4817 4801 4800 404 4809 1608 4609 4608 4632 1671 4610 W 1901 4821 0808 4611 4610 12 0 4611 j�0¢t 4613 4611 4876 4616 46 }1 a 4610 4615 0614 4801 2 4905 / 4615 4611 � E � 4611 .(617 0617 4616 0611 4816 0900 Ar 1 WAS. IBOS 4904 4707 6.1 4619 4819 7901 0 4620 4618 4813 4618 4621 1900 4908 4909 0 4612 1624 0617 4620 1903 4901 4622 o — v Property PID:1802824220085 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 Assessing J r Page 1 of 2 X http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV SDE &ClientV e... 6/6/2012 Lcgcnd Highlighled Feature Surrcu mdimg H.O Se N—L— La be Is Hause Number Labels Street Name Labels N City Limits r Creeks EjLake Names Lakes LParks 0 Parcels X http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV SDE &ClientV e... 6/6/2012 LOGISMap Output Page ' 1 - �, 1 p Page 1 of 1 3 4504 1 f7 ■ A i http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV SDE &CIientVe... 6/5/2012 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1 1 , http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_OVSDE &ClientVe... 6/5/2012 4805 Sunnyslope Road East Conditional Use Permit Written Statement About Use of Property /Description of Similar Projects Project Overview: Our clients, Doug and.Abby Power (and their two sons Josh, 11, and Owen, 9), currently are in the process of acquiring the property at 4805 Sunnyslope Road East in Edina. Doug and Abby moved to Edina from Chicago late last Summer as Doug took a position with General Mills. After searching diligently over the last six months to find the right long term location for them to build a home on in Edina, they settled upon this property as the location they felt most connected to with it's proximity to the creek and amenities in Edina. Yet, the site is not without it's unique challenges and parameters: • Given the proximity to the creek, we're subject to the parameters set out by FEMA, the DNR, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as we navigate the development of the property. • Given the property in on a peninsula on Minnehaha Creek, it is subject to the City of Edina code setbacks from Minnehaha Creek of 50' on three sides of the property. • The existing site has a 1953 one story walkout home that has been a rental for the last four years and is in significant disrepair. As we've met with multiple neighbors, they've mentioned how encouraging it will be to get the property cleaned up. The existing structure's Lower Level is in the 100 year flood plain level. We believe this has been a major development challenge with the site. • In order to have a new home 2' above the flood plain level for the Lower Level floor (which is the height suggested by the City of Edina code as part of the conditional use permit process), we will need to raise the height of the first floor of the new house above the City of Edina's code maximum of 1' above the existing structure's first floor height. Given the existing Lower Level of the existing house is in the flood plain, the way to achieve this is through a conditional use permit. Use of Property. o At the request of our client, an active family with two boys, we hope to build a new single family home on the property at 4805 Sunnyslope Road East. o Using classic architecture and careful planning, we've proposed a 1.5 story Shingle style home with attached garage for the site. o We feel the proposed design provides timeless architecture in an integrated fashion with the topography challenges of the site (due to the flood plain level) while ultimately complementing the fabric of the neighborhood. X. Conditions of Conditional Use Permit. • As part of the Edina City Code regarding Conditional Uses, "Additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit-buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building ", must meet one or more of the first three conditions listed in the code and:always meet condition four. • Given that part of 4805 Sunnyslope Road. East is in the flood plain, we'll be addressing Condition 1 of the Edina City Code regardinq conditional uses, which, states: "The first.floor elevation`may be increased to the extent necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 year floor elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), or the City's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan ". ® And since meeting Condition 4 is a necessity of all conditional use permits, we'll also addressing it. Condition 4 of the City of Edina Code, regarding conditional uses, states: "An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in-height, mass, and scale." Meeting Condition 1 of the Conditional Use Permit. • The current 100 year flood plain level for the site at 4805 Sunnyslope Road' East, as defined by FEMA in panel 361 of 479 on their Hennepin County MAP #27053C0361 E, effective September 28, 2007, is 888.1 (see FEMA's attached Letter of Map Revision). • Given a portion of 4805 Sunnyslope Road East is in the 100 year flood plain, we are applying to abide by the City's conditional use option, allowing the lower level floor to be two (2) feet above the flood plain elevation, or 890'1 ". • The existing .first floor height of the 1953 home at 4805. Sunnyslope €ast,is at 895'11" (see property survey). Under the City of -Edina code, we can placea new home up to 1' above the existing first floor height of the 1953 home withodt:a conditional use permit, which would be 896'11 ". • The difference between 896'11" and two feet above flood plain level, 890'1 ", is 610 ", which would be the Lower Level floor to Main Floor height if a conditional use permit was not applied for. • Given the structural space between floors is at least 18" (for floor trusses), this would leave a Lower Level ceiling height of approximately 5'4 ", an unworkable circumstance (and not in keeping with permissible municipal code) to the property for building a new home and thus the need for the conditional use permit. • With the information above in mind, we are requesting to raise the first floor height of the home from the allowable 896'11" to 9007' in order to accommodate a workable floor to floor height and still be 2' above the 100 year flood plain on the site. For reference purposes, we've included a Key Elevation Points Diagram (labeled as Drawing B) highlighting the various elevation levels we've noted above. ! . Meeting Condition 4 of the Conditional Use Permit. • The Sunnyslope neighborhood is characterized by diverse, hilly topography, relatively large home sites (approximately 1/2 acre of more; the subject site is .86 acres), and a variety of architectural styles of homes ranging from one story ramblers to 1.5 story homes to full two story homes. • We photographed over thirty (30) homes in the immediate vicinity of the site to provide context of the various architectural styles, height, mass, scale, and topography. We've provided a map and photographs of each of the homes for reference. After reviewing the information, it's interesting to note the diverse nature of the neighborhood in each aspect. For example, directly across the street from 4805 Sunnyslope Road East is a wide, full two story colonial house on a relatively flat property (see photo of 4800 Sunnyslope Road East), while the property next door to the West of the 4805 Sunnyslope East is a one story walkout mid - century modern home on the creek that does not conform to the flood plain level (see photo of 4801 Sunnyslope Road East; it's Lower Level walkout is 886'6" which is 17' below the 100 year flood plain and therefore isn't a reasonable topography /height comparison for the subject property). Overall, the neighborhood has examples of homes that are relatively large in scale, and others that are not. Some homes have three car garages. Others are relatively tall while others sit up on hilly sites. In considering the overall context of the neighborhood, we designed a double gable, 1.5 story home with a walkout Lower Level (given the existing topography of the site) and a link to an attached garage (see Front Elevation Concept Drawing C by Charlie and Company Design and Front Elevation Neighborhood Context Drawing B). With the design, we have taken special note to be in conformance of every aspect of the City of Edina Code in terms of height, scale, massing, hard cover, setbacks, grading, etc (see Site Plan, Grading and Drainage Plan, Key Elevation Points, and Property Survey), despite having to raise the first floor height as part of the conditional use permit due to the flood plain level. • By using an experienced group of architects and designers we've worked with in the past on our Edina projects (and particularly ones who have dealt with similar circumstances), we're confident we have a result that will be a beautiful, fitting addition to the neighborhood. Description of Similar Projects. • Elevation is a division of Streeter and Associates, Inc., a custom home builder with over twenty -five years "of experience building homes in the metro area. • Elevation's focus, as part of Streeter, is infill building = working in established neighborhoods to redevelop properties with new single family homes that fit the existing fabric in the neighborhood and are architecturally timeless. • While we've been fortunate to be a recipient of a Minneapolis BLEND award showcasing one of our homes' seam: less fit in the.Linden Hills neighborhood,`the core of Elevation's work is in Edina where we've completed multiple homes that have a similar Shingle architectural style to the home designed for the property at 4805 Sunnyslope Road East. • We've provided photos some of those homes at the following addresses: 4600 Woodland Road West, 4604 Woodland Road West, 4617 Tower Street, and 5201 Mirror Lakes Drive. • Of the properties listed above, 5201 Mirror Lakes Drive most closely resembles the overall appearance of what we anticipate 4805 Sunnlyslope East to resemble. On that particular property, we worked with significant topography to integrate the new home in a fashion that transitions well into the site and provides a fitting complement to the rest of the neighborhood architecture. • We invite you to drive by any of the properties above with the hope that you'll see we are committed to building homes that fit the character of the neighborhoods they are in and are respectful of surrounding properties. ®1T.mv u Tao avom nsTEl o Hain a Tec NavTnvrsr Ina or Tar z euNx a wn Harr eaTO. oauTVr aTm mlocr N WO[ u � \ � F �� �sb \ - . N O OION SST AauN® vv.ac W ■ savar c mWoe.n NN sm1 rAaaW mavar eomlr ar • mli mvETmr ea a Wrama rau n.sW Tin laszvvm ev uvvnamm IA�R � .+ Sp� RRF� (i � _ � �i - OmN N ND t, \ `� s ° 9 I) � �mmlrn ea Eoonm r® rsaemr xu am em1 mWTTL® sr Ar0 ROnaWTA1N WO ®YWE Olmra4 TONE IDO \ SPROT wNTROL ROI \ \ • \ • C \ � 1 ra ma•IEW nuNar a. E>eNE u Y1m roormr W.W •Y . ruR w ,® �n a ®o �� mvinmm m PO LENT PO S GLT OEMt ND CONORN UNR R N ER tr \ <�A i \ >� . ( # \ 1 O , 1 � Ul m WIRART YAIftl01d � ®N \ . \ cm STOP C RYORARE T T rrT r u T b1n r.u..v r . r rmla e.. r+.T m �� d r .r Iw awm enm r.l a�+.v �.:.s .ra •_mro v_ m .m 1. e® rur mve uE.r r . r.ma r o.�E ue. r .0 1.1 ua aJlm mm a..m.rr ®•• •Nr a.mrlr or r �. u n® rwET ._,.. � L^ n \ p0 i e`� Q DECmWW _ _ _ _ _ ���i � _ — _ _ i i e Eau loss Hain Earrovv mTDEE® (aLTmmlm N a wA .n rai I-Im ee.am fora+ virtu ®m os u_m. ar.a a s®r 4 s..1r wsr or a.wn vwbm n. IoEO.) # CONO'E1OW TAFl i �. f� �YSY'N � �ma•• „� j WWTSmv ra as uvuu en.ci Raam1+WM1 mTD®1nTU a ..>m o s.lsn uv1TEW u vsm Tv>aa vwvANO< Wr. LANDSCAPE ' � T87•T7 n,:'•• � / `tl ° ""'r Warr m ® ASPNID.T SURFACE I � / w � T�S�\ /� ORATEL SURTAR ` \ si mO COmm ®ra'A - nASA vay.e< raT Wa nvm .® mre E� a ®a Ea m.. n TOP OP'RETAmmG WAIL. \ \ J` bs - �"e'•.Ai ♦. BOrMV Or MAmmC WALL — (1000)— PRO POSm MMURS 6 ED (1000.0) PROP ATION I \ \ �Qi S'�y / -� /.♦ 'O PROPOOSSED ELT POKE �. �i LOT 1 NMDCOYER SI:Rr•CE C•LCS LOT MEA _ �- .').5AM56 ZEAY Sm r. \ : Sr Da T SF.Drol wnwm) 1 IY� , ' p - RFMR SOECN rOTOa •J53 Sf. \ j L - \ \ ULoPPrin ER - 21, ..O s' OF7i1MRQQ^ sr. TOTAL HARD ww+ - SWWI Sr. I NARDwKR wR�Art : - lases � (.)DENOTES MGS L.—OM '` - 11 ®1T.mv u Tao avom nsTEl o Hain a Tec NavTnvrsr Ina or Tar z euNx a wn Harr eaTO. oauTVr aTm mlocr N WO[ u � \ � F �� �sb \ - . � � g e �\ '11 - -. . AauN® vv.ac W ■ savar c mWoe.n NN sm1 rAaaW mavar eomlr ar • mli mvETmr ea a Wrama rau n.sW Tin laszvvm ev uvvnamm IA�R � .+ Sp� RRF� (i � _ � �i - t, \ `� s ° 9 I) � �mmlrn ea Eoonm r® rsaemr xu am em1 mWTTL® sr Ar0 ROnaWTA1N WO ®YWE Olmra4 TONE IDO \ y �6. \ \ • \ • C \ � 1 ra ma•IEW nuNar a. E>eNE u Y1m roormr W.W •Y . ruR w ,® �n a ®o �� mvinmm m tr \ <�A i \ >� . ( # \ 1 O , 1 � Imrai ravn Ns ns,v� ra em v ®u tWCn ®od mr•Wlmr .wNV mrm � ®N \ . \ � % / _ — �� .0 mra umvAL nano RaORSWO roaava Haas o>9alaas Iasi nr. ®m rvv�XOiar u —s name Tun �EVmI na rasa ra n vranrt Wammo n mer c rmm r1m T rrT r u T b1n r.u..v r . r rmla e.. r+.T m �� d r .r Iw awm enm r.l a�+.v �.:.s .ra •_mro v_ m .m 1. e® rur mve uE.r r . r.ma r o.�E ue. r .0 1.1 ua aJlm mm a..m.rr ®•• •Nr a.mrlr or r �. u n® rwET ._,.. � L^ n \ p0 i e`� � _ _ _ _ _ ���i � _ — _ _ i i e Eau loss Hain Earrovv mTDEE® (aLTmmlm N a wA .n rai I-Im ee.am fora+ virtu ®m os u_m. ar.a a s®r 4 s..1r wsr or a.wn vwbm n. IoEO.) : 9 i �. f� �YSY'N � �ma•• „� j WWTSmv ra as uvuu en.ci Raam1+WM1 mTD®1nTU a ..>m o s.lsn uv1TEW u vsm Tv>aa vwvANO< Wr. \ , p � T87•T7 n,:'•• � / `tl ° ""'r mno® Wnvva o I rat. ua Tan+TVm Au um u ra wr ar m• oRUa Ivam a1 'i.�sur`�r w:b1 '�r:.�.s�ile.e me rllW.'�r mue o .�� n ¢. �' a � / w � T�S�\ /� o ru m mv�aii® em eaa m c sum sous mm rt win mv:AE.ra W mr smL rE. s .�: � :.gym:.- lam` ®ra'A - nASA vay.e< raT Wa nvm .® mre E� a ®a Ea m.. uWn'••• WvvnuY u:e R•m DnaTm u IavNmum um e ra rm er u Eae•Ym ru m.... -. c� um eT® mTer. Il'!!/,y./V1-- Q � Q �Q11 •G(/�— Hill ji SITE PLAN � !'try p' ?� G]< yes s6 rt. F16RR STOOP 9]86 rt. lOwE111E1O16� 1966 A. pp�g0 n6Fm00]Fn 6,61]68 A. NO TVLS 7" -- -MM- Vo.em -R.W.M. site Plan L 1 tl 9 GRADING AND DRAINAGE LAN TVLS 0 -,- E] Powers Residence 0 0 C) Grading & Drainage MOTE m,,A Powers Residence Grading & Drainage Plan r L2 Power. 3 ^ • ; Charlie F R O N T E L E V A T I O N CONCEPT Residence &C9MPANV QV�" %, DRAWING C &Cof 05.11.12 scale: 7:20 � ta'�r��� Charlie Power &CBMPANY KEY ELEVATION POINTS Residence &C° 05.11.12 SCALE: 114" = V -0" DRAWING B Nate Wissink . :rom• . Strauss; Ceil C (DNR) <ceil.strauss @state.mn.us> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 3:36 PM To: Nate Wissink Subject: 2007 LOMR - Minnehaha Creek area Attachments: 07- 05- 4704P- 270160 -LOMR- Edina - Hennepin - Minnehaha- effective- 092807.pdf Hi Nate — see the table on page 9 of the attached pdf,.the profile on page 12 and the map on page 16. The flood elevation is flat downstream of Hwy 100, and is basically at the same elevation as at cross - section EQ, where the table shows the 1% annual'chance flood elevation at 888.1(NGVD, 1929). Ceil Strauss,tFIVI State.Floodplain Coordinator DNR Eco /Waters 500 Lafayette Road` St. Paul, MN 551554032 651 - 259 -5713 1 Federal Emergency Management Agency CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Honorable James Hovland Mayor, City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: Washington, D.C. 20472 SEP 2 8 2007 IN REPLY REFER TO: Case No.: 07 -05 -4704P Community Name: City of Edina, MN Community No.: 270160 Effective Date of SEP 2 8 2007 This Revision: The Flood Insurance Study report and Flood Insurance Rate Map for your community have been revised by this Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). Please use the enclosed annotated map panel(s) revised by this LOMR for floodplain management purposes and for all flood insurance policies and renewals issued in your community. Y Additional documents are enclosed which provide information regarding this LOMR. Please see the List of Enclosures below to determine which documents are included. Other attachments specific to this request may be included as referenced in the Determination Document. If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations- for your community or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please contact the Consultation Coordination Officer for your community. If you have any technical questions regarding this LOMB, "'please.contact the Director, Mitigation Division of the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in Chicago, Illinois, at (312) 408 -5529, or the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1- 877 - 336 -2627 (1- 877 -FEMA MAP). Additional information about the NFIP is available on our website at http: / /www.fema.gov /nfip. Sincerely, J. I Craig S. Kennedy, CFM, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Directorate List of Enclosures: Letter of Map Revision Determination Document Annotated Flood Insurance Rate Map Annotated Flood Insurance Study Report cc: (See attached list.) For: William R. Blanton Jr., CFM, Chief Engineering Management Section Mitigation Directorate W/-'-/ Courtesy Copies List The Honorable Linda Koblick Commissioner, Hennepin County Board of Commissioners The Honorable Eugene Maxwell Mayor, City of Hopkins The Honorable Jeff Jacobs Mayor, City of St. Louis Park Mr. Scott Brink City.Engineer City of St. Louis Park Ms. SuzanneJiwani Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Mr. Thomas Macdonald, P.E., C.F.M. Barr Engineering Company Mr. Robert Riesselman Park Nicolette Health Services Page 1 of 5 Issue date: SEP 2 8 201 ctive Date: SEP 2 8 2007 Case No.: 07- 05 -4704P LOMR -APP �rr,Stxr�F Federal Emergency Management Agency r .. •'ti Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT COMMUNITY AND REVISION INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION BASIS OF REQUEST City of Edina BRIDGE CULVERT HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS Hennepin County NEW TOPOGRAPHIC DATA Minnesota COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NO.: 270160 Park Nicollel LOMR (MN) APPROXIMATE LATITUDE & LONGITUDE: 44.915, - 93.370 IDENTIFIER SOURCE: USGS QUADRANGLE DATUM: NAD 83 ANNOTATED MAPPING ENCLOSURES ANNOTATED STUDY ENCLOSURES TYPE: FIRM' NO.; 2705300351 E DATE: September 2, 2004 DATE OF EFFECTIVE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY: September 2, 2004 PROFILE(S): 42P, 43P FLOODWAY DATA TABLE: 8 SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES TABLE: 5 Enclosures reflect changes to flooding sources affected by this revision. • FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map; " FBFM -Flood Boundary and Floodway Map; "' FHBM - Flood Hazard Boundary Map FLOODING SOURCE(S) & REVISED REACH(ES) Minnehaha Creek - from approximately 3,500 feet downstream of County Highway 100 to approximately 3,200 feet upstream of Louisiana Avenue SUMMARY OF REVISIONS Flooding Source Effective Flooding Revised Flooding Increases Decreases Minnehaha Creek Zone AE Zone AE YES YES BFEs' BFEs NONE YES Floodway Floodway NONE YES ' BFEs - Base Flood Elevations DETERMINATION This document provides the determination from the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding a request for a Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) for the area described above. Using the information submitted, we have determined that a revision to the flood hazards depicted in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report and/or National Flood insurance Program (NFIP) map is warranted. This document revises the effective NFIP map, as Indicated in the attached documentation. Please use the enclosed annotated map panels revised by this LOMR for floodplain management purposes and for all flood insurance policies and renewals in your community. This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding tnis aetermination. it you nave any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1 -877- 336 -2627 (1- 877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMR Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NFIP is available on our websile at htlpJhvww.fema.govinflp. Craig S. Kennedy, CFM, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Directorate X /(-1 109770.10.3.1.07054704 102 -1 -A -C Page 2 of 5 Issue Date: SEP 2 8 2007 Effective Date: SEP 2 Case No.: 07- 05 -4704P LOMR -APP t y Federal Emergency Management Agency b Washington, D.C. 20472 aj9.Sti�O LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (CONTINUED) OTHER COMMUNITIES AFFECTED BY THIS REVISION CID` Number: 270166 Name: City of Hopkins, Minnesota AFFECTED MAP PANELS AFFECTED, PORTIONS OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY REPORT TYPE: FIRM' NO.: 27053CO361 E DATE: September 2, 2004 DATE OF EFFECTIVE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY: September 2, 2004 PROFILE(S): 42P SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES TABLE: 5 CID Number: 270184 Name: City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota AFFECTED MAP PANELS AFFECTED PORTIONS OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY REPORT TYPE: FIRM' NO.: 27053CO361 E DATE: September 2, 2004 DATE OF EFFECTIVE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY: September 2, 2004 PROFILE(S): 42P, 43P FLOODWAY DATA TABLE: 8 SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES TABLE: 5 his determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have ny questions about this docurnent, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1-877 - 336-2627 (1- 877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Z, Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. AddilionaPlnformation about the NFIP is available on ourwebsite at htip: / /www.fema.goy/nrtp. Craig S. Kennedy, CFM, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Directorate /� 109770.10.3.1.07054704 102 -1-A -C Page 3 of Issue Date: SEp 2 g 2007 Effective Date: SEP 2 8 Z00 Case No.: 07 -05 -4704P LOMR -APP Federal Emergency Management Agency 0a Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER-OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY INFORMATION APPLICABLE NFIP REGULATIONSlCOIVIIVIUNITY OBLIGATION We have made this determination pursuant to Section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93 -234) and in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (Title X11I of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, P.L. 90-048), 42 U -S.C. 4001 -4128, and 44 CFR Part 65. Pursuant to Section 1361 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, communities participating in the NFIP are required to adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations that meet or exceed NFIP criteria. These criteria, including adoption of the FIS report and FIRM, and the modifications made by this LOMB, are the minimum requirements for continued NFIP participation and do not supersede more stringent State /Commonwealth or local requirements to which the regulations apply. We provide the floodway designation to your community as a tool to regulate floodplain development. Therefore, the floodway revision we have described in this letter, while acceptable to us, must also be acceptable to your community and adopted by appropriate - ommunity action, as specified in Paragraph 60.3(d) of the NFIP regulations. 14FIP regulations Subparagraph 60.3(b)(7) requires communities to ensure that the flood - carrying capacity within the altered or relocated )ortion of any watercourse is maintained. This provision is incorporated into your community's existing floodplain management )rdinances; therefore, responsibility for maintenance of the altered or relocated watercourse, including any related appurtenances such as )ridges, culverts, and other drainage structures, rests with your community. We may request that your community submit a description tnd schedule of maintenance activities necessary to ensure this requirement. :ONIMUNITY REMINDERS We based this determination on the I- percent - annual -chance discharges computed in the submitted hydrologic model. Future IeveIopment ofprojects upstream could cause increased discharges, which could cause increased flood hazards. A comprehensive estudy of your community's flood hazards would consider the cumulative effects of development on discharges and could, therefore, adicate that greater flood hazards exist in this area. (our community must regulate all proposed floodplain development and ensure that permits required by Federal and/or ;tate/Commonwealth law have been obtained. State /Commonwealth or community officials, based on knowledge of local conditions and a the interest of safety, may set higher standards for construction or may limit development in floodplain areas. If your ;tate/Commonwealth or community has adopted more restrictive or comprehensive floodplain management criteria, those criteria take rrecedence over the minimum NFIP requirements. We will not print and distribute this LOMR to primary users, such as local insurance agents or mortgage lenders; instead, the community vill serve as a repository for the new data. We encourage you to disseminate the information in this LOMR by preparing a news release br publication in your community's newspaper that describes the revision and explains how your community will provide the data and ielp interpret the NFIP maps. In that way, interested persons, such as property owners, insurance agents, and mortgage lenders, can -enefit from the information. his determination Is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional Information regarding this determination. If you have ny questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center loll free at 1-677 -336 -2627 (1- 877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the OMR Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NFIP Is available on our website at http: /Avww.fema.gov /nfip. Craig S. Kennedy, CFM, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Directorate /; 109770.10.3.1.07054704 102 -1 -A -C Page 4 of 5 Issue Date: CP 2 $ 2007 Effective Date: SER2 8 2 Case No.: 07- 05 -4704P �aMR -APP Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (CONTINUED) We have designated a Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) to assist:your community. The CCO will be the primary liaison between your community and FEMA. For information regarding your.CCO, please contact: Mr. Norbert Schwartz Director, Mitigation Division Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region V 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor . Chicago, IL 60605 (312) 408 -5529 STATUS OF THE COMMUNITY NFIP MAPS We are processing the revised FIRM and FIS report for Hennepin County in our countywide format; therefore, we will not physically evise and republish the FIRM and FIS report for your community to incorporate the modifications made by this LOMR at this time. Preliminary copies of the countywide FIRM and FIS report, which revised hydrologic /hydraulic information along Minnehaha Creek for four community and other incorporated communities in Hennepin County, were submitted to your community for review on -tuber 21, 2006. Based on comments provided by the affected communities, the hydrologic/hydraulic information has been revised re results of these revised analyses have been incorporated into this LOMB. We will incorporate the modification made by this u..,vIR into the revised preliminary countywide FIRM before it is distributed and the modifications will be included when the countywide TRM becomes effective. 3ecause this LOMR affects only Panel 27053CO316 E, the flood hazard information presented does not tie -in with the adjacent panels; he adjacent FIRM panels are not being revised at this time to reflect the revised analyses. When the revised preliminary FIRM is submitted to the communities for review, they will be revised to correspond to this LOMR. its determination Is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have my questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1- 877 -336 -2627 (1- 877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the p. 'R Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NF1P is available on our website at httpJAvww.fema.gov /rT Craig S. Kennedy, CFM, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Directorate 109770.10.3.1.07054704 102 +A -C Page 5 of 5 Issue Date: SEP 2 8 2007 Effective Date: SEP 2 8 2007 Case No.: 07- 05 -4704P LOMB APP ART � Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 ND LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (CONTINUED) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF REVISION PUBLIC NOTIFICATION BFE (FEET NGVD 29) MAP PANEL FLOODING SOURCE LOCATION OF REFERENCED ELEVATION NUMBER(5) EFFECTIVE REVISED Minnehaha Creek Just upstream of West 44th Street 890 889 27053CO361 E Just downstream of County Highway 100 889 888 27053C0361 E Within 90 days of the second publication in the local newspaper, a citizen may request that we reconsider this determination. Any request fo�seconsideration must be based on scientific or technical data. This revision is effective as of the date of this letter. However, until the 90 -day period has elapsed, the revised BFEs presented in this LOMB may be changed. A notice of changes will be published in the Federal Register. A short notice also will be published in your local newspaper on or about the dates listed below. Please refer to FEMA's website at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/flun/Scripts/bfcLmain.asp main.asp for a more detailed description of proposed BFE changes, which will be posted approximately within a week of the date of this letter. LOCAL NEWSPAPER Name: Edina Sun Current Dates: 10/18/2007 10/2512007 This determination Is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1 -877- 336 -2627 (1- 877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMR Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NFIP is available on our webs{te at httpJhvww.ferna.gov /nrip. Craig S. Kennedy, CFM, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Directorate �, Z� 109770.10.3.1.07054704 102 -1 -A-C DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Proposed Base Flood Elevation Determination for City of Hopkins, City of Edina, and City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Case No.07- 054704P The Department of Homeland Security's. Federal. Emergency Management Agency solicits technical information or comments on the proposed Base (1- percent - annual- chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs). shownin.the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and/or on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for your community. These proposed BF-Es are the basis for the floodplain management - measures that: your community is required to either adopt or show evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). For a detailed listing of the proposed BFEs and information on the statutory period provided for appeals; please visit FEMA's website at https• / /www floodmaps fema aov /fl nn/Scripts/bfe main.asv, or call the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1- 877- FEMA MAP. `V EK EP (Deleted) - - BASE FLOOD FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY WATER SURFACE. ELEVATION - - FEET NGVD 59,175 52 220 SECTION MEAN 888.1 888.1 0.0 ER 59,375 132 WIDTH AREA VELOCITY 888.2 WITHOUT WITH ES CROSS SECTION DISTANCE~ (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE 60,150 212 1,004 FEET SECOND) - 888.3 888.3 0.0 EU ehaha Creek 32 204 3.1 888.8 888.8 888.8 0.0 EV inued) 69 376 1.7 888.8 888.8 888.8 0.0 EW EA 51,685 400 711 1.55 867.5 867.5 867.5 0.0 EB 52,628 235 499 22 869.8 869.8 869.8 0.0 EC 53,605 120 292 3.77 871.7 871.7 871.9 0.2 ED $4,093 95 207 5.31 872.5 872.5 872.8 0.3 EE 54,235 240 1,370 0.8 878.2 878.2 8782 0.0 EF 54,670 150 528 2.08 878.2 878.2 8782 0.0 EG 55,081 150 567 1.94 878.3 878.3 878.3 0.0 EH 55,235 120 625 1.76 881.8 881.8 881.8 0.0 El 55,349 200 2,540 0.43 888.9 888.9 888.9 0.0 EJ 55.647 195 2.520 0.44 888.9 888.9 888.9 0.0 EK EP (Deleted) - - - - - - - - EQ 59,175 52 220 2.8 888.1 888.1 888.1 0.0 ER 59,375 132 681 0.9 8882 888.2 888.2 0.0 ES 59,699 117 554 1.1 888.3 888.3 888.3 0.0 ET 60,150 212 1,004 0.6 888.3 888.3 888.3 0.0 EU 60,575 32 204 3.1 888.8 888.8 888.8 0.0 EV 60,750 69 376 1.7 888.8 888.8 888.8 0.0 EW 61,406 91 391 1.6 889.0 889.0 889.0 0.0 EX 62,206 81 301 2.1 889.3 889.3 889.3 0.0 EY 62,346 40 235 2.7 889.5 889.5 889.5 010 EZ Deleted - - I - I - I - n FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENE(n �� FLOODWAY DATA HENNEPIN COUNTY, M L m (ALL JURISDICTIONS) EFFECT SEP 2 $ 2W7 °° MINNEHAHA CREEK \V` \v 1 Feet above mouth FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENP FLOODWAY DATA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN REFLE m ^ (ALL JURISDICTIONS) EFFEV IVE SEP 2 8 ZW7 MINNEHAHA CREEK FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY BASE FLOOD WATER SURFACE Et_ ION (FEET NGVD SECTION MEAN — — -- -- — — WIDTH AREA VELOCITY 19 WITHOUT WITH 889.9 889.9 CROSS SECTION DISTANCE' (FEET) (SQUARE (FEET PER REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE FJ 69,216 FEET SECOND) 2.4 890.0 890.0 890.0 Revised. Minnehaha Creek — -- — — -' .Data (continued) 1 Feet above mouth FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENP FLOODWAY DATA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN REFLE m ^ (ALL JURISDICTIONS) EFFEV IVE SEP 2 8 ZW7 MINNEHAHA CREEK FA-FG (Deleted) — — -- -- — — ` FH 67,890 19 121 5.3 889.9 889.9 889.9 0.0 FI (Deleted) FJ 69,216 11 33 2.4 890.0 890.0 890.0 0.0 FK FO (Deleted)— — -- — — -' 1 Feet above mouth FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENP FLOODWAY DATA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN REFLE m ^ (ALL JURISDICTIONS) EFFEV IVE SEP 2 8 ZW7 MINNEHAHA CREEK TABLE 5- SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES — continued FLOODING SOURCE DRAINAGE AREA PEAK DISCHARGES AND LOCATION _ (sg. miles) 10 -YEAR 50 -YEAR 100 -YEAR 500 -YEAR At Excelsior Boulevard 124 529 626 653 771 00 W 0 0 LLJ LU F- JdU W W � 1 III /� zx il For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping, refer to the Community Map History table located In the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine . If Rood' Insurance is available In. this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1 -B00- 638 -6620. MAP SCALE 1" = 500' 250 125 0 250 500 750 9.000 Feet 1 Meters PANEL 036.1E FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA (ALL JMSDICTIONS) PANEL 361 OF 479 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX EDINA, CITY OF 270160 0361 E HOPKINS, CITY OF 270166 0361 E ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF 270184 0361 E RE;VISE ®T0 REFLECT LOMB EFFECTIVE sEP 28 2007 Notice to- User: The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number shown above should be used on Insurance applications for the subject . community. MAP NUMBER 2705300361 E AND t;� EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2004 Federal Emergency Management Agency m ® m m m m Q. qJD MINNEHAHA CREEK I the Minnehaho Creek Watershed District is committed to a leadership role in protecting, improving and managing the surface waters and affiliated groundwater resources within the District, including their relationships to the ecosystems of which they are an integral part. We achieve our mission through regulation, capital projects, education, cooperative endeavors, and other programs based on sound science, innovative thinking, an informed and engaged constituency, and the cost effective use of public funds. QUALITY OF WATER DATE: May 9, 2012 TO: Nate Wissink I WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF LIFE Memorandum FROM: Steve Christopher, Regulatory Program Manager RE: 4805 East Sunnyslope Rd., Edina The existing regulated 100 -yr (1% annual chance) floodplain elevation for 4805 E. Sunnyslope Road is 888.1' (NGVD, 1929). The District regulates for alteration and fill of land below the projected 100 -year high water elevation of a waterbody. If there are any questions or comments, please contact me at shristopher&minnehahahcreek.org or 952- 641 -4506 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard, Deephaven, MN 55391 - 952 - 471 -0590 - Fax: 952 - 471 -0682 - wwwAnnehahacreek.orq ooem% m am" low sn n i Wks i ii MIA VIIN ,,) P6 4 V -TW I"' 5201 Mirror Lakes Drive 7jZ (Front of Home 5201 Mirror Lakes Drive �� (Front of Home) 5201 Mirror Lakes Drive (Back of Home) .a r 3a sue" 0 MOM" ■■. �n 4600 Woodland Road West (Front of Home) -- lib wpb 61 of M 1, mom �^ 4600 Woodland Road West (Back of Home) M 4604 Woodland Road West �. % (Front & Back of Home) 4604 Woodland Road West (Front of Home) 77 man, EL si ii i = 4604 Woodland Road West (Details of Exterior) 4617 Tower Road �/ (Front of Home) 4617 Tower Road �2 (Back of Home) 4617 Tower Road /� (Front of Home) mo-Al 18312 Minnetonka Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 - 0 952.449-9448 F 952.449.4987 Mn Lic. #BC645426 Elevation Hornes.com • Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map InteractKe daps t 4505" RE AVE 24 ?4 4562 49D3. 4504 4507 LU 4i1 450111505+ 4506 4503.. 4508 491': ,'pl ag I 4Si►7 4508 4`511 � "• L' 48G - 45ti9 4804 451 4508 48 C I5 47 24 .4513. 4911. 4501 45i45i: 3,4812 48W 45.15 . � 4;6+6 ry 480 5 4601 , 4600 4Si�4 3' �M 5; 4� 46t�9'0 3 i. 4824 4808 4 « L 460 46ti4 -Q 46{ 48 8 4g} � PO.?VD +1607 4606m, 40 LA 483 4817 4804 4600 4509 4C-�G$ 46 48 1 4808 1$ 1-1 4v� +1 5 '46114610. 4 • " I A 118 , 40. _ . 4 510 # • �`1. $bl 1O W 4612 C6 A� G .. 7� 49000 ` qS�l S 4904 : a 490 11 �1G14. ^' e Z 4901 ' 4813 "14 461.8 s� '�C,4 4908 .Q 4909 8 �. 490 `� 4904 � ^� 13 s - rn Q7CIO 4909 4908 4908 -0 4905 rn 4913 q 4913 10 46 : "4 4912 17 491 ? •391 4917 4916 it 4916 4�71 4921 4916 49,)l 4 5 T. 4 92 Cu 4020 CY 4913 481 f 1 Qti2 q 4925 .., 4920 SQL' 49-74 ti61.LJOV 4A 9--,,4 4929 8V � �i 4928 4805 4929 4SO1 4.928 ' __ •S s01 Parcel 18.028 -24 -22 -0085 _ A -T -B: Torrens Map Scale: 1" 4 ID: Print Date: 5/9/201 Owner C Mooty & E Mooty Market $1,475,300 Name: Total: Parcel 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E ,9 y� Tax $22,954.86 St AW > •i�`.�.4 '� t r � IY � �:: SYa b♦a4 �!�' ^� +1 �,. .•�M -.*'t - a . f'!+�` aw , -, 4 i 46_ MR+�nt i p •v E r leiA. t* ' �� a s e/ . % � . f r,! ;;. �,- r ' 'G j � K ' r, g ' (�� •... .P_,.� �i it i s. , ' d ��, .,4 ��Y _ i.. f:��.,,v i_ Y�Y ♦R Mi9fL',Rh. "vw:;• �.% �F •�,+� i f ���4.;�r' r ,��t�r r j.�F(r . �"� �� rte: �,'1�a:. �s`�y�;���• ���}i� r;� •+i'l i, ./ _ iwy �- ~N _ Rit K .,ri r ,�- _ 'l 4804 Sunnyslope Rd E - #3 ,r :�•��. \;y�L' � ~� �> .f.�t :. � � , � f .tai -, x- rt 1- s _ G j� f '!x „S.iw. \ •!!. '�. mot. ,>� 7 '±r� l .. s , -•T- .xfr �t S i •i �7a y 4- �s _ • � '�a'�r. '� �r1 h• s`5.�� "'4,.,,,..¢'�,!� if � rr i'`" a - � `t T a` -. • � -Y♦ ,� °fit �•_ - t y ^_ � .� Af " Y ' ,r `: x'. �Lp� •4, `� Ts� - r VIII" -- ,. , . - , - �; • S -�n'- - C y -rs t2^•7kT+c9' =1T'tc t A •� -}155 ~5r2���i'�ti.'' -r�;G= Te !: �:1A&MMOTI o•- :• :' • �,`, � �s'�` . � -�Y,- � �+���l -fj, � `� spa _,� � •,� ��► ' j - S r .. ' � tip•. ,�•, � � .•� �" "�iF ">�: ter• '� Z �'"y \ - .1' .,r ;fin ����. 1 \1`#i jt. �,s�: �'•�, (l ,�� =L"i - r .- Ns l A mks it an anal .. all Mi RIM W. 1 Yf \laity 11�1� ;01.. � y Ar +, iAkti'�s Y h'•S "Yyw:r, t %'i 47 Ilk rc It 'SF �' � ey'✓""�, �`,c 'sue ^roc ��, \� .' !^:. r�.�:�[, � \C � r l .� � 1 '��:5 Y �N�lt� � I••'. �U'1 "�'� .� tit }+`' �.'��. "�."■�r�[� � ,1 __ r .•« y.,., '� '` Kr a .z , r , 'v . • . _"' »f Vii' ' � .+ �'P !� wil•i M1'{ '�L R' I♦�1: ., r' • • ,�: d- INl fi * J' :�,,�. fir. ,' -L �. r_ F. , ,_ � .� �.. -.rte jjr�• . •N Ant- 1 M b 1 - r _�.: �:= r r+tp''7'!iY`.'zY'J: ?rte_.... - '����■i �n'?�.'rr� : i.� .. w Is . ,.��� -••t `���, ?''i .M �t _— it .��, � -� y ' .` .. —__ �� _ - j ✓ ` •� ; .�' '; _4 ' may• - - __ - Jam`• r i� � � .J • !�� - ..nom _ -.. � -- ��. ...� �• _.... .y'.:`. -. - f 1 - S _ J iY -•rte . . A� ■ - _ r_�. .._- . _ _ - -_ ...... —C ij tYJ � •tr�fi•.tf � i �� '1 t �' ���'tI�A" r a I . �7•.y 3 i �. � ri � _ i r 1 ":31 0 Ab 4 .•.a � � .,,�,rj °� ,y�w1 K y • "f'�+t �k`�t!"'�r. �c�„,�ru�.> ^ C ,� i+ 'c y= e 4909 Sunnyslope Rd E - #8 +k r low �F K w Mao or � r1 t' � • i .•�� 'tom r,� ° t. j. �:y, ` Los- mom am. BAI 40 iqr i Y 2 r • 1' �i• \1rnr� r�= r.i-wii��•i: sm.d; :` �• Oft Odin ��a iir - ,d Rr.� ��� ri�rrrirrs: . ,,;•.. �rz �. i M _ we ; 4 - �`�r.�,�+ -rte i � Syr - .:.- ,..,.,; � - � �' =4 - am.� 4917 Sunnyslope Rd E - #10 � - • �„M / air i , s . �� 'F�b {�•'•- Ito OF —L IL Ali- lift e ___ .� •�- -- ._- .._.- -. .yam r . """- '. "�:. .`:y - - _ � =� ' ate^ J y•. — a _....r +,.r, ,a - -' -`+, +ham• e- ` " ��.. - a• �•'.r�. � .� '� F .111 i �>, > � t .. .v'•y � !, :'.r , • _ : .~'J. j1� : >:r 't ✓'i •ayr ,�'�e},y: ,. Rim ._V'- Y'�.� 'y_ .war '"� •� ��N�� - �t�_`�'� - -� _-- Fllsi�37•?�. _� ..i, / - . /��rA 3r :r f�i� � � :�� „1 ti`IC• ' i � ..� � r r� _ -- - � _ ...`�-= •..._r «i Mkt AN, Ity .t�••� f ` � ,! iii. � � '. Y• •� .♦, �- .. Twu ACS 4:' ����'M� �� y `ia• i t .� . �4t • `1 lrr •�� }� ' .. 14•x, �. � �i�,..` �, •t � - — — — — — - - �,�,a �,� 'fit �;�, �ti ",v •g� - _ 1 i 1 ' 1 1 ^- ♦ .ky Y -L�- ka 1 Alp al Elam i.. S rii�1 1 , �N �k 6 S6.4i d, w f �1 4904 Sunnyslope Rd E - #15 4801 Woodhill Way - #16 F 4801 Woodhill Way - #16 + �•j�`` k , yam.. r v. er NNW a. n a+�'e l `rk 4"tS.`.'�t� �' ��i1�tk:.':-0 � s. ♦',iA `�.'�; _ r _ %:L'd��rE 4800 Woodhill Way - #17 AMOK tv -D 111 �I Way - #18 010 "Al 4808 Woodhill Way - #19 -s 4812 Woodhill Way - #20 14 A " 'P6 jai, :77 f7'- 4r7 rw-., i� "t-� I mrek.4- . r - �t S`•s 1 « � 'w ,hy `.•. � mow.. ' � ,:r � �o r . • � ,iy^O•y� „ �J��JOtI� ., . d4,e i a -.. l '.5�1� i'� ' • •i� � � w. �, 'sue � { +Jy Wit• •� � '. ` .. a , '.; � �� M i � fyf� � *`-*�y j' 1.�. .' Rey : l ,r ' \� 7 1 �_... _ ,` ,,A 1 . -A�%{I � r. � r'�•T�a17 � y., ` f . • � t ,4^•. - :��, _.�tf' ~ T; . \�.♦ ' .' • ¢�V`�;�••.�rr }� - •'� , .•�" '�•��i f'M1 r.. M �,r a. "�.a, • L''�°r� ".�'��'�. •'-ra_ - __ ,..rte• .. . ,K. 1 N� =J `�� { .. e?,� -','r. _ .:iii • • � ii��. �� •' •. , f ,......r...� .r a .....- ..��w..,. .�� imp 40 4 --Q-05w: - r .. - .. .mac_.. _.. ..... ... . � d i wti F y, 4817 Sunnyslope Rd W - #23 f`t'°:�.{ ti •1 ,fir .y .. 1'• - `- \. -• �'1 ����- � r e • \ \, '• ` .. •.lam .S �•'�• �'� .' � .t. TN :L T �.,,�'�- "w�"i; �`� b It vl • '•' .. �. .y a r /t � ..��.�1+. - < < ,- ,i!r'r ,�:..1�A . "" =ti -`yi !4• (� .. t+ � �� � �. w ,so! •�t],� .� � {�v . '� � °j,•7`rJ yyn�r t+ '� L� '� � �� M4 1{ � r �• � - r Ar - • + .r • { tarp. t.' ^' i , ` -4 +� r A. ; r. i . ••i. ;, - , SAW Qwft Iv rt- ^ v- '•v •` -� .�. rf„ � t f �%3�' r t.1►r .. , -� ..,[j`Cy/4 f!�!. �+y _ f�K +c .�� - � .. � M ` ■aV T■ qe�Q `, ♦ ^`. ..• � ,.r% 3 - - J' Yy 1' t i. Y. .. ,A%- Art a ® ■■. _ .. ��``. • „ti. ^ ,” - `� At ` .. .w - ^� - � 1 S � O��i °�vt�pe°w•�'6�° z � )s� •- -` c Iv l� tcsn— �.....aa.wx. _ • /i �1 Y - ` . an Fr .. ,■ _ ,.. L _ li rt.. F f. i .s � ry, �� �� T .,Ad d1go 77 ww dL jr-- 11w rA Ao� oil WL son& SEEN ft AIL AY 77 ww dL jr-- 11w rA Ao� oil WL son& SEEN ft l.•ri• Y ` l I` ` { t.. .,�i �} r� �'� - ���y',lI T!y, �r j,��. 'VV.f:° fr .1 f ' Ii V •,`r �\ hit. 1, t. l i ', •!_ {/ -_ - _ � err •` �tL/ �/ r a�/ � / 4804 Sunnyslope Rd W - #29 r1' 4808 Sunnyslope Rd W - #30 -^A- .4 A Joe- -_ __ �-'�= _r -� - -_- Z= ._'��_ ��i op, � -= ?�i •thy ._�.� r • �- - ,cam.. - _ _ .c f - . . . . . . . . . . . M _ �. n. ,.:.,•-„ ,� h . _ �..'3z -'.` `^ � Nom` *�` . —' - r1' 4808 Sunnyslope Rd W - #30 -^A- .4 m , eA� RiV 114 IF o � /le •z�v • \cO'JBOB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # VI. C. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE ® Action Director of Engineering F1 Discussion Information Date: December 20, 2011 Subject: Public Hearing — Public Right -of -Way Vacation Request — Portion of West 41 St Street and Natchez Avenue, Jennifer and Mathias Samuel, Resolution No. 2012 -86 Recommendation: If the Council so desires, approve attached Resolution No. 2012 -86 vacating existing public right -of -way of Natchez Avenue between Monterey Avenue and south property line of Lot 15, Block 4, of Minikanda Vista, Third Addition, Morningside Minnesota, and West 41St Street from Natchez Avenue to Monterey Avenue, conditioned on retaining the utility and drainage easement of West 41St Street including the northerly 260.59 feet of Natchez Avenue. Info /Background: This is a request to vacate the public right -of -way of Natchez Avenue between Monterey Avenue and south property line of Lot 15, Block 4, of Minikanda Vista, Third Addition, Morningside Minnesota, and West 41St Street from Natchez Avenue to Monterey Avenue, see attached sketch. Staff has contacted the private utilities requesting their feedback. Centerpoint Energy does not object to this vacation. Century Link, Comcast, and Xcel Energy do have utilities in the northerly area of the requested vacation. City of Edina Utilities Division also has a storm sewer located along West 41St Street that connects to City of St. Louis Park's storm sewer system, see attached sketches of the utilities (Xcel and Comcast did not share their plans). Staff is therefore requesting that the utility and drainage easements be retained for all of West 41St Street and also the northerly 260.59 feet of Natchez Avenue. The Edina Comprehensive Plan does not indicate future roadways, sidewalk, or trails within the proposed vacation area. Council Member Bennett had requested the size of lots after the vacation. Attached you will find a responding email from Community Development Director Cary Teague outlining the lot sizes and potential values of the new lots. Our City Attorney has indicated that the City Council cannot designate which property will gain from the vacation. The property owner of 4166 Monterey indicated verbally that, if possible, they would like the City to designate all of the right -of -way adjacent to their property. This request has not been included in the resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2012 -86 Original Application with sketch of proposed vacation Revised sketch of proposed vacation Sketch of utilities located within the proposed vacation area Email dated June 13, 2612 Notice of Public Hearing g: \pw \admin \comet \external \general corr by streets \n streets \natchez avenue vacation \Item vl.c. public hearing - public right -of -way vacation request.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2012-86 GRANTING THE VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OF SEGMENTS OF NATCHEZ AVENUE AND WEST 41'T STREET WHEREAS, a petition was received on May 9, 2012 from the property.. owner of 4166 Monterey Avenue requesting the vacation of existing public right-of -way of Natchez Avenue between Monterey Avenue and south property line of Lot 15, Block 4, of Min ikanda' Vista, Third Addition, Morningside Minnesota, and West 41St Street from Natchez Avenue to Monterey Avenue, conditioned on retaining the utility and drainage easement of West 41St Street including the northerly 210.59 feet of Natchez Avenue; and WHEREAS, after two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on June 19, 2012, at which.time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to.be in the best interest, of the City and.of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS the City Council has determined that the easement are not needed for public purposes: NOW, _THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described right -of -ways are hereby vacated effective: EASEMENT 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY 1O BE VACATED: That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of a line parallel with and, 100.00 feet south of the westerly extension of- the.south line. of 415Y'Street West and -lying westerly,.of a line lying 50.00 feet westerly of the easterly right of way_ line of Monterey Avenue, formerly known as Oakdale Avenue, as dedicated in the plat of WILLIAM SCOTT'S ADDITION, all according the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EASEMENT 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED CONDITION ON RETAINING DRAINAGE .AND.UTILITY EASEMENT: That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of,the ,westerly extension of the north line of Lot 14, Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION; MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", and lying northerly of a line parallel with and 100.00 feet south of the westerly extension of the south line of 41St Street West together with that part of 41St Street West lying easterly of Natchez Avenue South and .westerly of the southerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 12, said Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", all according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. FURTHER, that the vacation of easement 2 shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Passed and adopted this 19th day of June 2012. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2012 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk w91�,j City Of Edina, Minnesota DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION ay 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-1394 - ^�� Phone ❑ (952) 927 -8861 TDD ❑ (952) 826 -0379 Fax ❑ (952) 826 -0390 PUBLIC RIGHT.'.-OF WAY VACATION APPLICATION' Applicant �L' NtJ IFG� 4Mu��— % MAIyA\61& Print Narhe Address- H l a A A b u i✓Y,,3 09-- G b 1 IJA M 0 �5- y Street City /State Zip Telephone No. G1 J6a- trg I -1 a lot Fax No. I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right of way pursuant to M.S. 412.851 and Edina Code Section 820: [P Street ❑ Alley ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Other ❑ Utility Easement Legal description of the area proposed to be vacated (Please note all legal descriptions shall be transmitted electronically to the City of Edina City Clerk: Dmatigen &Ledina.mn.us): vAY -9 2012 1 11r MAY -112 012 Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof term a abut upon ❑ Yes No Please note if the area requested to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, no vacation shall be made unless written notice of the petition is served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources by the City. of Edina thirty days before any Council action. • Attach a copy of a scaled drawing showing in full detail the area proposed to be vacated. • Include the vacation fee of $450.00 with your application. THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina Is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number and Social Security Number. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, Department of Public Safety, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, Ramsey County Warrant Office and other persons or entities deemed necessary for verification of Information submitted In the application. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. I request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number areas follows: Address b Telephone Number Date Initiated " " l/)'b 5 l 1L Signature 03/07/2012 Account No. 1001.4391 Vacation Sketch For �Q1eIC,INAL� b0EPENJITENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 283 0 EI T I LO � 45 /W'LY EXTENSION ,.' j�' i�'� v, %- �•OT 0 / OF THE N LINE OF LOT 14 i� F- -J IQ � �C <' o C� i) � J IF, a� a� 0 ao 11 r V C w J Q U 2001 -116 -B 593/16 T.28 R.24 S.7 SMT 20011168002.dwg .I 4 "4 D��C1T i OT i 4 61121/1 1, i 'q'^ v ^ 1 rRVrvacu rnvn awr 39,588 50 FT. r X W F >_ H O J Ly LL J 0 0 '0 3 50 �p 50 4 i 'Z I �V E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE 1^ LINE 50 FT W'LY OF THE N E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE, F.K.A. OAKDALE N AVENUE V SO °07'03 "W 0.44 I SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS S.9001 �� East Bloomington Freeway 5350 — Suite IIS Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -3435 952 -881 -2455 (Fax: 952 -888 -9526) YAM www.sunde.com Vacation Sketch For (pr,..jejAj,& ") INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 283 That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 14, Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", and lying westerly of a line lying 50.00 feet westerly of the easterly right of way line of Monterey Avenue, formerly known as Oakdale Avenue, as dedicated in the plat of WILLIAM SCOTT'S ADDITION; together with that part of 41st Street West lying easterly of Natchez Avenue South and westerly of the southerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 12, said Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", all according to the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this sketch, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 7th day of May, 2012 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. Mark S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 15480 _ SHE'E'T > OF 2 SHE'E'TS, Aff .' ^� F 9001 East '35W) a SUfte 118 S1' Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -3435 -� 952 -881 -2455 (Fax: 952 -888 -9526) 2001 -116 —B 593/16 T.28 R.24 S.7 T A X711M /Jw trttats Ll� !M!.'A1rS1e��a a!r!!1<1 SNIT 2001 11fiPrM.drrg _ j i! Vacation Sketch For.•v,s INDEPENDENT SCHOOL I�IS77RU T 283 ° /� �/ L V 1 1 5 11 , W'LY EXTENSIO O 1 10 / OF THE N LINE OF LOT 14 i% " �� � ~1 �O -J C> �J I� c� Z ,sa C> �J p W MIT V) Y i J d l.01 1 LOT . 2 ��a ,. � � v W = o S89 °42 'E . 267.59 - >- i� t� . 1) 0 0 a�f .�50 °0 p��3 60 0 N89 042'01 "W 26759 50 PROPOSED VACAT /ON - -- ---- - - - - -- 39,588 50. Fr r i ,c` J� k rJ� i 'I Ali V 4A IT WA\f `S o ,3� ° VA N N O r U C J Q 0 N 2001 -116 —B 593/16 T.28 R.24 S.7 SMT 20011168002AW9 S89 122157T . 80.78 .1 O� a N V ° 81.30 `` oU I 11114' �ah\ - - - - -- -- Jl SO °07'03 "W V .�" E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE LINE 50 FT W'LY OF THE E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE, F.K.A. OAKDALE AVENUE SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS SUNDE 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (350) • 435 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -3435 952 -881 -2455 (Fax: 952- 888 -9526) LAM .SURVEYING - www•sunde.00m I� c� Z p W MIT V) Y i J d l.01 1 LOT . 2 ��a ,. � � v W = o S89 °42 'E . 267.59 - >- i� t� . 1) 0 0 a�f .�50 °0 p��3 60 0 N89 042'01 "W 26759 50 PROPOSED VACAT /ON - -- ---- - - - - -- 39,588 50. Fr r i ,c` J� k rJ� i 'I Ali V 4A IT WA\f `S o ,3� ° VA N N O r U C J Q 0 N 2001 -116 —B 593/16 T.28 R.24 S.7 SMT 20011168002AW9 S89 122157T . 80.78 .1 O� a N V ° 81.30 `` oU I 11114' �ah\ - - - - -- -- Jl SO °07'03 "W V .�" E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE LINE 50 FT W'LY OF THE E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE, F.K.A. OAKDALE AVENUE SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS SUNDE 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (350) • 435 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -3435 952 -881 -2455 (Fax: 952- 888 -9526) LAM .SURVEYING - www•sunde.00m Le C., &- L— ) PROPOSED VACATION DESCRIPTION That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of a line parallel with and 100.00 feet south of the westerly extension of the south line of 41St Street West and lying westerly of a line lying 50.00 feet westerly of the easterly right of way line of Monterey Avenue, formerly known as Oakdale Avenue, as dedicated in the plat of WILLIAM SCOTT'S ADDITION, all according the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 14, Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", and lying northerly of a line parallel with and 100.00 feet south of the westerly extension of the south line of 41St Street West together with that part of 41St Street West lying easterly of Natchez Avenue South and westerly of the southerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 12, said Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", all according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. W 41 ST W 42 ST W 42 ST W 42 ST § - -� F Y i W42 ST Z< j W CENTURYLINK CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. DISCLOSED TO GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY PURSUANT TO LAW. NOT TO BE DISCLOSED BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION BY CENTURYLINK INC.. w ride the ht Q w e st. WIRE CENTER GLEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA Grid ID: (Lat /Long) 44.92591/-93.34W9 4 150' 4.92774/- 93.34065 4.92591 /- 93.34065 DISCLAIMER: All Facility Locations are Approximate and Facilities Must be 4.92408/-93.34065 Spotted by Appropriate Agency Prior to Excavation 1 l 0, oi* jq W r � U � 2 n 2 Y 3 , n CITY of Sr. Gam, s � STOP-ti Sib j_14m.n `J N a W ► EC � F J IO I SCALE. 1' +100' S"�' I 14 II I I 14 II I ' lad n" j - -- 13 12 I I 13 I 12 NB•A rD 1 f,-TYPE C.t. J > • • e Y nn nR I Y. IL to 12' STORr SEWER Y.N. 10 ' 12 I ' mi • BY OTHERS Q ' r f I I CONTRACTOP SHALL PAOVIDE 12" STUB 19 11 2 II AT ELEV. 63o.0 Y. M.IOB N W © FV 3 i ' I Y.RI Q 2 b` 10 1 0 9 � iY I� e 4 II Y 1112 p° 9 s 6 1 6 5 ~ mall / Ao 10 s ► ' -1 I V Ex. 3f', R.Cl pG c 4 20 ► ' I 7 6 � / II r . Z.A 2 W 9� Q Q Q—USE NOTE: FOR N.N. 10, IOB, II B 12 B- 2 "ADJU'46' RINGS 0 sou roe.Yer IR[roPi oRLP rJ R F LPe r.R. +e[ II[.eri eLTre P, -- r -.. .i. _.. -. . _3,TPE.-• «._ _....''°:: : :.I -- I .. _ -- - — -_ -_ - - -- ._ ... . —.._ TYPE `E' CASTING: __ O . ... h ; _ _m _' _ _ .: :. By OTtlEA4 FADE _ _ _ n i ' ' :T.SEC.' L�C.. • T. R. t19.00 EERDB` LbNG RADIUM T. R. 87081 - I TYPE '0`CASTING -. : TYPE - E� CASTING _ 6 LSEE .... ... .. - - - T- SECi1W - _ ... _,._. T: 3Et Tmli F!INILARY;i�fWfR RC• ._ I L GNEET.p ... .90�' _ .3��__�' I . °- -_ . .. .r "" .- LO _ D[fq .___.. • :_ _.866 ..Ed W aB'Ie 3A. INCREASER 0. IS e __ O.DO:/e 660 ... _.'.:. .. .. - -- - -- -- `4 -mAt, - -- - - .._..- - W �11uZPB.m�a.elPE:dA3.i .I I ., ___.._- d'•rt2'• <e RC.P .....• - 381'- -.. -. 9B'RC. P. -- - .. _ "93. °u• .. •INCLUDING G LON6 AADUS SENDS B I NCA HA6EG PIPE � I of ...._. -..._ ._..�.. _...-__... 9t .R.C.R VP. b. -.. ...:. I I I i '-'- -r --��� Jf. -0.]G .R.CR.___.'....�_•.. INCLUDING 2 LONG RADIUS B 930' -CL. II _— SEzISPE 1 1 SE ._.. .__. _.... ... .I _ 87 Y kk 9 LR , .. f.1 EWc o Mg 6601. ... :' :. _ LoRr.. ( Lun I. tLAT . I I .... .. .. .. I. 840' _._ -- .._____.__ ..__.._.._._.- ___._... ..... ..., FRA �... _ _... .._ ........_ _.._ -.. .• ... _..,_.: -_— _ _ _ - -__ —_ _ _ ...... .... ... ._... _.. ......_ _ __ .. ... 62.00+' _- .. _ »Iq.____ MD 7� _ Lso y _.._ . 30 T nn —._.--_.-_ _ADLG.NR- OfT10NAL is.QKNAT101f'- COjJCEHN1Ae'. fig: —... EAOtTi JIT-6 WA- ENGWEEgIMG OFFICE.. i -- 8 0 . -t. . _.._. .s.__�35 --- --' --- n —... —r . ------- LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1 61try of Ge /Alfa i-AT14 7755 http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_OVSDE &ClientV... 6/14/2012 GENERAL LOCATION ONLY. DO NOT USE TO LOCATE FOR EXCAVATION. CALL 'I- 600 -252 -1166 . . FOR ONSITE. LOCATIONS AND STAKING. 4005 4004 F P LML a- W, 005 4 F�" 4007 4 006 007 0 ' �7—�iooq M- 4009 4d08%— 4010 g, jj, 4013 4012 4013 *N -Qwj 4014 me" M4016 Mim 4019 t... J r 4020 ---m4021 < (911 + o 413 W. 30 14401 COOL 4105 1 0 74 I L 04) _t 54-0 0 p 113 1. A 4117 Plotted by: 1065652 Fieidi: Scale: 1": 100' --� Ulf Plot Date: 15/512012 Field: S,�rftfnt FJ1819Y N0,Ih Wavne Houle r"rom: Cary Teague Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:17 PM To: Jennifer (rjmeyovy @comcast.net); Wayne Houle; Joni Bennett (jonibennettl 2@comcast. net) Cc: Scott Neal Subject: questions about vacation of easements Attachments: 20120613151749005.pdf Hi Joni and Jennifer, I did an estimate of assumed lot line shifts as a result of the right -of -way vacation. Typically, half the property within vacated right -of -way goes to the owner on one side, and half to.the owner on the other. That is assumed in the scenario attached. Lot Sizes before the rieht -of -wav vacation 4021 Natchez 15,036 s.f. 4022 Monterey 7,181 s.f. Vacant School site(24) 76,055 s.f. 4166 Monterey. 24,496 s.f. Lot Sizes after the rieht -of -wav vacation (estimate 4021 Natchez 20,571 s.f. 4022 Monterey 10,481 s.f. 'acant School site(24) 103,021 s.f. 166 Monterey 30,046 s.f. The property values would increase as a result of the right -of -way vacation.. If the vacation is filed in 2012, the year 2013 assessment would go up for taxes payable in 2014. Our assessing division did a rough estimate of the increased value of the two lots that are privately owned. It is estimated that the land value would increase $25,000 for 4022 Monterey, and $50,000 for 4166 Monterey. The other properties are owned by the School District, so they are tax exempt, and would remain as such. There is not a sidewalk, path or trail identified in the Comprehensive Plan within this right -of -way. Please let me know if you, need anything else. We will include this information in the Council packet. Ca ry Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952 - 826 -04601 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 Cell 952- 826 -0236 cteaauena.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice - - - -- Original Message - - - -- prom: Jennifer [mai Ito: rimeyovy @comcast.netl Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:15 AM To: Cary Teague; Wayne Houle Subject: questions about vacation of easements 1 Cary and Wayne, I am emailing on behalf of the MNA steering committee regarding the proposed vacation of easements on Natchez and 41st Street, We understand this will be on the Council's agenda for Tuesday. Looking at a property map, there appear to be four properties in Edina that abut the easements. They are: 4021 Natchez, which is undeveloped land, owned by the SLP school district Address unassigned, a school field, owned by the SLP school district 4022 Monterey 4166 Monterey Questions are: If easements are vacated, how will lot sizes change? For example, current lot sizefor 4166 Monterey is shown on property records to be 212 x 104 x 210 x 156. What will be the lot size if the easements are vacated? If lot dimensions change, does this increase the taxable value of the property? If yes, when is that increase in effect, and is there a way of knowing or estimating how. much the increase will be? Are there any known or potential transportation uses (including sidewalks; paths or trails) for the easement ?.. Thank you very much. Please let me know if you have any questions. Jennifer Janovy - MNA`steering committee 2 Vacation Sketch For .P.P.IVD•P.NT S'CWOOL .DI S'TPICT 989 J..N -rj h y9 0 /1y '4,, 1 vT :O EXTENSION -'50 �4` / OF 7HE N INE OF LOT 14 F CJ I J �) O h ter; v0 C` !j C� C� S � l�� y v v tL o Co II t U C w b U 2001 - 116 -8 593/16 T.28 R.2.1 5.7 SLAT 20011168002.dwg 1,^' �•� YID` /i,1`'1 C.. (i r 17Oq 4N1 Ct: I 4 �r- �l V` q 1 rrrul -vpry VIIlielff —, 39,588 S4. FT. W =0 .0 O JO'0 1 �l / L E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE ! LINE 50 FT W'LY OF THE E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE. F.K.A. OAKDALE AVENUE - --- -V- SO 007'03 IY 0.44 I r4FITTT Z UT 2 StIL'L`TS s 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (35W) • Suite 118 �� Bloomington. h1innesola 5547.0 -3435 tS �'.49 DJi(�/! 952-881 -2455 (Fax: 952- 888 -9526) _4 LAND SURVEYING www.oundo.com It 4701 4125 4131 4135 4512 4141 �41d5 :I.a��.un:l'n :.A r1 \IS C[:•:: )'c i'- 1- CG5l;�.:.4ii 4016 4019 4026 4021 03g 1022 a8l 4019 4021 4101 4116 4117 4166 q {l9 4121 4120 K 4504 4502 4500 4403 4406 4404 4330 4104 4105 4108 4100 4112 4113 4116 4117 4166 q {l9 4121 4120 K 4504 4502 4500 4403 4406 4404 4330 ozlh 9llt zNr BOtr rorr our I rorr I ,�` sorr nohr solh lolr I UP FLIT [Ilr £t!h GOIr �tor I� oosr znsr h056 L 1�1 � 9.416 AS 1 I C. Y ' L 11 I tt Sff�' :1•l5'[4 :: );. •ifi .` n7 :I`J f Y �_ v. K•�:�:, •r'� shlr/� trtr ttsr S£lt L£lr SZlr L ' — tzor ui h riot rorr ozor rtoh olor . CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-"OF-WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, .Minnesota will meet on June 19, 2012,at 700 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for a public right -of -way easement to be vacated: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF public right -of -way easement TO BE VACATED: That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot.14, Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE•MINNESOTA ", and westerly of a line lying 50.00 feet westerly of the easterly right -of -way line of Monterey Avenue,' formerly known as Oakdale Avenue, as dedicated in the plat of WILLIAM SCOTT'S ADDITION: together with that part of 41St Street West -lying easterly of Natchez Avenue South and .westerly of the southerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 12, said Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA "; all according to the recorded plats thereof,,Hennepin County, Minnesota All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of "way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made'shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the. vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric,. telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains; and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation,resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of th'e proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk Dated: May 15, 2012 Vacation Sketch For. - INI0EPEMDENT SCHOOL -DISTRICT 283 / y�9 �,^ LOT ; 5 , �„r „ W'LY EXTENSION ,� ,r '���i�'�, Lv� / OF THE N LINE OF LOT 14 c� F— `J CJ �� VJ � CT <' o C� C� <y cr � J bj � J a d 0 00 II r U c w J Q U In 2001 -116 -B 593/16 T.28 R.24 S.7 SMT 2001116B002.dwg I, Vi,^ P/ +� T i nr . /' 1C� V i�4 Y V, 1,� .< LvT ii Y"i__ r-rs rn+.n I1Wv 39,588 SO. FT. >- ~ _j J L' ( 0 3 °W ;0 o '0 0 to 5� 0 �1 4 / \_ E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY AVENUE 0 LINE 50 FT WILY OF THE E'LY LINE OF MONTEREY ry AVENUE, F.K.A. OAKDALE vAVENUE .50 SO °07'03 "W 0.44 I SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS UNDE 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (35W) a Suite I I Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -3435 952 -881 -2455 (Fax: 952 - 888 -9526) L"_ D �+vR.y�s�G www.sunde.com STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY'OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING. NOTICE I, the undersigned, .being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date November. 22, 2011, personnel of the Edina .administration Department acting on behalf of. said City deposited in the United States mail copies `of a Public 'Hearing Notice (Exhibit A) to be held on June 5, 2012, postage thereon duly prepaid,; addressed to the .persons at. the. addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit.-B) attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those- appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed -opposite their .respective names, as of May 18, 2012 prior to -the date of the hearing; and that I also sent ' said notice to the following corporations.at the indicated addresses, whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of May'201'2 Edina Clerk i "AMAV-OD-008 -1 F W jdn -dod pjogaj al j819AgJ luawaBJeP f 60915 ®AU3AW tyIeyef al Zaslllz fl wor/Gane•mmm a ul a ajn �e e e zal da P 4 4 I. I a ap suag I , Aelod q, 4015 MONTEREY AVE 4021 MONTEREY AVE ® EDINA MN 55416 0702824130001 0702824130002 0702824130003 BRET BETTERMAN SUE ANN GUILDERMANN DENICE K JASPER PHYLLIS NARCISSE ANAMARIA BETTERMAN STEPHEN PHILLIPPS MARIE M KRUEGEL DALE E NARCISSE 4100 LYNN AVE 4104 LYNN AVE 4009 MONTEREY AVE 4108 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130004 0702824130005 ol ouli 6uole puag ' - - v - - i - - 0702824130006 PETER HWEE TIMOTHY R VELNER . qel; BROMLEY E JOHNSON LAI KENG HWEE KATHLEEN R HARTMANN BARBARA JOHNSON 4112 LYNN AVE 4116 LYNN AVE 4120 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130007 0702824130008 0702824130009 ROBERT] LUNIESKI LAURIE J NEFF PAUL J GANS PATRICIA ] CORCORAN 4117 MONTEREY AVE 4113 MONTEREY AVE 4121 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130010 0702824130011 0702824130012 ROBERT C BEYERL GLENN P BINDER MICHAEL ] FLYNN LIANNE BEYERL DORAE S BINDER MEGAN M FLYNN 4109 MONTEREY AVE 4105 MONTEREY AVE 4101 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130048 0702824130049 0702824130050 PAUL B BANKER TINA BURBACH DONAVAN L HINRICHS JULIE K GLOVER BANKER JOE BURBACH CLAIRE HINRICHS 4000 LYNN AVE 4002 LYNN AVE 4004 LYNN AVE 'DINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130051 0702824130052 0702824130053 MOLLY A COOK KRISTIN A HACRTEL NANCY A SCHWAPPACH ETHAN COOK 4008 LYNN AVE BRUNA BUCCIARELLI 4006 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416 4010 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130054 0702824130055 0702824130056 MARY M MASON SARAH DANIELSON PAUL R NICHOLAS 4012 LYNN AVE 4014 LYNN AVE KAREN E HEINE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 4016 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416 0702824130057 0702824130058 0702824130059 LYNN AVE PROPERTIES CHERYL A CURTIS RICHARD H CRONSTROM 4220 CROCKER AVE 4020 LYNN AVE 4022 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130060 0702824130061 0702824130062 ORIOL T VALLS SUSAN E DUNNE - GUZMAN ROBERT HARRISS MAUREEN E VALLS ANDREW R GUZMAN 4015 MONTEREY AVE 4021 MONTEREY AVE 4019 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130063 0702824130064 0702824130065 DENICE K JASPER ROB K KRUEGEL NAOMI H LAFRENZ 4013 MONTEREY AVE MARIE M KRUEGEL JASON P LAFRENZ EDINA MN 55416 4011 MONTEREY AVE 4009 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 P �a6P3 d 0 -dod asodx a ® jaded pa al 0915 a;eldwaJ, owv asn -,- wj.096S ®AUSIAW - d ol ouli 6uole puag ' - - v - - i - - - - - - - -s a l as /se 3 .. . qel; i A213AV-09-008-1, widfl -dod pjogaj Of Jalqnqa +" °"' ire eb a zas If1 ®0915 pA21�Ab 3, q I II ' wortiane•nnnnnn a ul a aan �e a zal da p 4 4 I 18 Op suag , salad r, sal13%1 puenbl�� ® 0702824130066 0702824130067 0702824130068 WENDY A PESKAR MICHAEL A HERBERT RONALD AHOLA FRANK W PESKAR 4005 MONTEREY AVE DAWN AHOLA 4007 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 4003 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130069 0702824130070 0702824130071 ROSE C JACOBSON SUSAN M ST JAMES MARJORIE A LISOVSKIS RICHARD L JACOBSON 4000 MONTEREY AVE GEORGE P LISOVSKIS 4001 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 4002 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130072 0702824130073 0702824130074 KELLY M DRAXTON RITA EIGEN JEAN P CEDERHOLM JARED D ANDERSON JAMES M EIGEN JAMES L CEDERHOLM 4004 MONTEREY AVE 4006 MONTEREY AVE 4008 MONTEREY AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130075 0702824130076 0702824130077 ' VERNA M DORNIN ROBERT J GENOVESE MICHAEL L MILLER PAUL E DORNIN.. 4012 MONTEREY AVE DIANA C COOPER 3907 WARWICK CT EDINA MN 55416 4005 NATCHEZ AVE CORAOPOLIS PA 15108 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130078 0702824130079 0702824130080 KEVIN B FAUS MEREDITH L ANDERSON MILACNIK RESIDENTAL RENEWAL INC. KATHLEEN M ROBISON 23204 GRASST PINE DR 3615 INGLEWOOD AVE 4016 MONTEREY AVE ESTERO FL 33928 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130081 0702824130082 0702824130083 INDEPENDENT SCH DIST #2.83 ROBERT J O'BRIEN JEAN C HUBERS 6425 W 33RD ST 4019 NATCHEZ AVE HARRIS E HUBERS MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 EDINA MN 55416 4017 NATCHEZ AVE ' EDINA'MN 55416 0702824130084 0702824130085 0702824130086 TIMOTHY G CHAPDELAINE ZOHREN MAHDAVI TRACI L MANN 4015 NATCHEZ AVE 4013 NATCHEZ AVE STEPHEN.A ENGEL EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 4011 NATCHEZ AVE EDINA MN 55416 0702824130087 0702824130088 0702824130089 THEODORE T JOHNSON INGRID R LOPEZ ORSINI MICHAEL MILLER 4009 NATCHEZ AVE FERNANDO L TORRES DIANA C COOPER EDINA MN 55416 4007, NATCHEZ AVE 4005 NATCHEZ AVE EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 0702824130090 0702824130091 0702824130110 TEMMA R SHANKMAN BROCK A BURKETT MARCUS A MOLLISON JAMES J HYMAN 4001 NATCHEZ AVE KRISTINE J MOLLISON 4003 NATCHEZ AVE EDINA MN 55416 4504 42ND ST W EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 " 0702824130111 0702824130112 0702824130113 TODD M MCINTYRE / TRUSTEE SCOTT R GAMBLE JOHN EDWARD NIELSEN CAROLYN L MCINTYRE / TRUSTEE JOLYNN S GAMBLE ALLISON F NIELSEN 4502 42ND ST W 4500 42ND ST W 4408 42ND ST W EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 EDINA MN 55416 P e dP as d d 09.S aleldwal �anC asn wi09 ❑ _ _ _ - o1 au le puae j M v` I slage aad sea Jam and $mudge, Free Printing vvww,avery com Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 5960 *M 1- 800 -GO -AVERY i 0702824130116 0702824130117 �I LINDA S BERBEROGLU THERESA M CARUFEL �I 4330 42ND ST W ALTON J CARUFEL EDINA MN 55416 4324 42ND ST W EDINA MN 55416 0702824130129 0702824130138 I MATHIAS W SAMUEL SETH SERGENT - LEVENTHAL 4166 MONTEREY AVE I 4406 42ND ST W i EDINA MN 55416 i EDINA MN 55416 0702824240147 0702824240148 A RESIDENT A RESIDENT 4512 42ND, ST W 4701 41ST ST W ST. LOUIS PARK MN 55416 i I I I i I III ST. LOUIS PARK MN 55416 I i (i I I i , AVERV®R 5960rrfn 0702824130128 INDEPENDENT SCH DIST 283 6425 W 33RD ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 0702824130139 JULIA POPE STEELE JEFFREY A STEELE 4404 42ND ST W EDINA MN 55416 0702824240149 A RESIDENT 4801 41ST ST W ST. LOUIS PARK MN 55416 r • i �w0965 a A83AV-09-008-G sW096511aege6 ei zesimn - '- 0���� - - - - - worRaane•nnnnnn - - - - �Pidea e6eg3as a 1a a6exrnogi�ue uoessaadual 3965 3924 3931 3928 3955 3916 3917 3928 3929 3.932 3929 3932 3931 3924 3971 3934 3935 3932 3959 3620 3921 3932 3933 3936 3933 3936 3935 3936 3975 3940 3941 3936 3963 3914 3925 3936 3937 3941 3940 39373941 3940 3941 3940 3981 3944 3945 3940 3944 3971 3928 3929 3.940 3945 3944 3945 3944 3945 3944 3933 48314819 4813 48014715 4707 4701 4001 .4000, •4001 000 4001 4000 400 4000 4001 4000 4825 4807 4721 4701 rn .4003 .4002 4004' 40DJ / 005, 400 •r r 400 400 4004 4008 4003 4004 4003 4002 4824 4816 4810 4705 4709 ,4005 400 00 r.,., 4006 00 4007 4006 406 4010 400 —4011- 4006 4005 4004 4832 48014713 II 4069 r}j iav 4008 r.<. 4009- / ri-,. '008 r rli. 4009 4012 4013 4008 4007 4008 4815 4805 4700 4011' '' 4013' 4010' r'! 401A 4011 i� 4013 4010,/ r ' 4012/ 401 4013 401'4 4016 4015 401 4010 4011 4012 48314821 4708 4704 4015 „i 4014 4015 4014 , 401 401 4019 4016. 4016 4020 4835 4716 4720 401 Z/ rr' 4016. ll/� 4016 "'� 017--4020— 4020 4804 •4019 I'll /// 4019 � 4018 4019 4022. 4021: �- 4022 4810 4701 r 402. 4020 % /i/ 4022 4021 4020 402 4024 4023 4025 40532420 �4022r 4023 -4026 4024 4059 4 4015 4801 4101 100 -4101 100' 4021 48414829 24 /4105' 4f04r 24 4103 ,4102, 4108/ 4109 4108 4107 4120 4121 j4f09 O n S 5 4112 4111 4124 411.2. ce 4113 4125 4113: 4116 4115 24 4115 ? 411.7 4116' 24 4117 Weber Feld Park 4130 4131 4120 4120 4121 4134 4135 4512, /4166 '4121 4120 4121 4124 4126 4125 4140 4141 / 4810 4144 4145 4Y504 4502.45004408.4406 4404. 4324 430 43044300 412 . 420 4200 4100 4136 4820 4f50 4151 C Gj ri /n / NO 4224 4212 4200 4201 4200 4201 4200 4201 2f 4206 4205 4204 4205 4525 4515 "` 2, 4201 32 4317 4313 4305 43 f 2214217 4213 4205 201420141134109 42L 4209 4269 4208 4211 `4204 4205 4309 4215 1f1, f0 42L 4213 4212 4215 4212 4212 4208 4211; •4212 4211 4206 4217 4216 4219 4216 4209 4208 4209 4206 4221 4220 4225 .4220 4212 ,4215 4216 4213, 4212 4208 4225 4224 4224 4213 4212 4213 4210 4229 4228 4229 4228 4216 '4219 '4220 4215 4216 4234 4240 4235 4232 4233 4234 4217 22 40 4215 421 4232 4236 4237 4238 4220 4223 .4224 4217 4216 421 234 4245 4241 4240 4241 4219 4224 4247 4224 4227 4228 4219 421 4216 4245 4714. 4221 4226 422 4218 422 4249 4828b822 4246 4249 4 !04228 4231 4232 4220 4816. 4251 4223 4228 4223 222 4223 4222 L TTLE ST.- 422 4230 422 4224 4225 4246 4251 4815 48f14805 4253 4232 24 422 4232 422 4226 422 4224 4250 n g Ce' 4231 4234 4257 4254 , 4229 4229 4226 4254 4255 24'' 4234 4233 4231 4230 4230- 4258 4261 4260 4257 4236 4233 4232 4231 4232 423 4262 4265 4264 4261 24 4236 :Q"4 4237 4238 423 4234 4235 4234" 4265 I 4237 4236- 4266 4269 4268 4269 4238 x 24 } . 4239 4240 4270 4271 423 4238 4270 4240 424 4238 4239 4240' 4272 4273 4274 4273 P4 4242 4243 4242 4243 4242 4242- 4274 4244 424 244 4245 414 4243 4244- 1 14278 4526 4500 4281 440 4246 4247 -431 8 4246 4247 4208 -424 424 42467 4287 X12 4400 r-4350-1 4248 4249 420 4114-4110_4248- 4916 4280 MVW=mdagn- dus.ce;�,;ft ,(C)LOWGGZM I AdCtl4N6YGSEDPf70 Pagel of- 1 4214 4211` 4218 4219 4220, 5/18/2012 REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI.D From: Jeff Long Chief of Police ® Action Discussion Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: Cocina Del Barrio Appeal of Administrative Penalty ACTION REQUESTED: Follow the administrative penalty matrix listed in Edina City Ordinance 900.15 subd (3) and uphold the $1000.00 fine and three d_ ay liquor license suspension for this second violation within 24 months. Edina City Ordinance 900.15 subd.(8) reads: Computation of Violations, Any violation which has occurred within twenty -four (24) months of the current violation shall be counted. This is the second violation for Cocina Del Barrio within six months. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: On May 15, 2012 a server at Cocina Del Barrio, 5036 France Ave, served beer to an 18 year old male despite looking at the legitimate Driver's License of the 18 year old. In all capital letters above the picture, the Driver's License has printed "UNDER 21 ". This is the second liquor ordinance violation for this establishment. Additional Background: Cocina Del Barrio was mailed a letter on April 16th, 2012 alerting them that the City of Edina would be sending decoys into restaurants within 60 days, under the age of 21, who will attempt to purchase alcohol. A packet of pictures showing sample "under 21" licenses, along with descriptors of how to read the licenses, was included in the packet. A copy of the letter is attached to this report. The protocol for the compliance checks is straight forward with no attempt to hide the decoys age. The inspections are performed to ensure that our establishments are compliant with city ordinances and state statutes. It is our experience that underage drinkers will lie in order to obtain alcohol and it is important that the servers actually inspect the license given to them. On May 15, 2012 an eighteen year old, male, decoy entered Cocina Del Barrio and sat at the bar with two "plain clothes" officers. The bartender approached the three individuals and asked all three for their ID's. All three people handed their true ID's to the bartender, who looked at each one and handed them back. The two adults and the 18 year old then ordered individual beers. The bartender then served each person, which included a glass of Coors Light to the 18 year old. When the server was advised that he had just sold to an underage person, he stated he thought the date on the driver's license said "1983 ". However, as stated above, the driver's license says "UNDER 21".. This is the second alcohol ordinance violation in six months for this restaurant. Cocina Del Barrio currently has a probationary liquor license that was issued in April 2012 after they failed to meet the food -to- alcohol sales of 60 percent food to 40 percent alcohol. That was the first violation for Barrio. In addition to the probationary liquor license they were also fined $500.00. A stipulation to the license was that City staff would complete a monitoring visit after six months. Edina City Ordinance 900.14 subd. (8) is titled "Computation of Violations ". It states the following: "Any violation which has occurred with twenty -four (24) months of the current violation shall be counted ". The key word is "any "; they do not need to be the same violation. The penalty for this, as a second violation of the liquor ordinance within 24 months, is a $1000.00 fine and three day suspension of the liquor license. The establishment has paid the $1000.00 fine. I recommend that the City Council uphold the three day suspension. In addition to the administrative fine, the server has been charged with a gross misdemeanor violation of Furnishing Alcohol to a Person Under 21 years old. o RESOLUTION NO. 2012-89 .�y DENYING APPEAL ON SELLING OR FURNISHING "�RIOWt�Oe ALCOHOL TO AN UNDERAGE PERSON eeB Section 1. BACKGROUND. City of Edina 1.01 On May 15, 2012, a server was issued a citation for serving alcohol to an underage person at the Cocina Del Barrio restaurant, 5036 France Ave. 1.02 The serverrasked.for identification from the police decoy, which showed that the decoy was under 21'years old. The other two people in the group were also asked for their ID's, however they were over 21. 1.03 The driver-licenses were handed back to the group, inclUffing the "under 21" drivers license. The . server thensefved the beer. Section 2. FINDINGS' 2.01 An emp oyeeofCociha Del Barrio did serve alcohol toamindividual under 21 years old. 2.02 A driver's lidens&maspresented showing that-onmcfath'eJpeapie he was serving was under 21 years ald'... 2.03 Serving-Meohoi to. a.minor. is a gross misdemeanor vioiat-tdn:of state statute 340A.503. 2.04 State Statue3:40A_415addresses. the civit� penalty. -retatingto this violation. 2.05 Edina City:Ordihance,900:.15: adopts:statute- 3.40A..415:as .part of the Edina City Code. 2.06 Edina has:a ,penalty` matrix- forviotatian+ .h.r.rdft- s:.incdm"o:iame-with theguidelines set by-State Statute .and:EityCode.: 2.07 CociFla •:Dea�&arrcp..has:one:priorvio. lot!'dilwrithfrr.the;:past-2:4 °months. Because this is their second violatio.n<they must:.pay a-$ 1000AW .fine•.and:have:theiriigoor- license suspended for three days. Section 3. � � DENI'AL.- NOV1l THEREFGRE,. it'is.hereby resolvedthat:the;City,C6untcil of the City of Edina, denies the Appeal of the:. Administrative :Penaityfor Cocrna:Def13arri¢and` Lpholds the penalty of $1000.00 and a liquor licensesuspension ofthree days..-..,. Adopted bythe=CityCouncito Me, City of Edina;, Minnesota- zrfJime 19, 2012. ATTEST: Debra. A. Mangen; City Clerk. Janaes;Z. Hovland, Mayor Edina Police'Department Administration (952) 826 -1610 4801 West 50th Street Fax (952) 826 -1607 Edina, Minnesota Police 24 hr. and TDD Line (952) 826 -1600 55424 -1394 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. w9tA,r�L e y � ... City of Edina Chief Jeff Long Edina Police Department April, 2012 Notice of Alcohol Compliance Inspections To: Managers of all Edina establishments licensed to sell alcoholic beverages During the next 60 days, the Edina Police Department will be conducting alcohol compliance inspections in all public establishments licensed to sell alcoholic beverages in the city of Edina. The police department is mandated by the city council to conduct more than one such inspection per calendar year. Plainclothes police officers, along with persons under 21 years of age, will enter each establishment and order or attempt to purchase alcoholic beverages. We are trying to ensure that all wait staff and sales clerks are checking IDs and refusing sales to persons under 21. Please review your Alcohol Service policy with your employees. Remember, persons under 21 will have a Minnesota driver license or ID card that bears a black stripe across the top with the words "under 24" embossed on the card. The adult (over 21) driver license bears a red stripe across the top. We have had previous violations where the server has looked at the under 21 license and still served the underage person. Along with service of alcohol to persons under 21, officers will be checking for other compliance issues, such as: • Current liquor, beer & wine, or 3.2 beer license prominently displayed • State of MN placard outlining warnings to pregnant women and criminal penalties for DWI • Persons in possession of or consuming alcoholic beverages outside the physical boundaries of the licensed establishment • Service of alcoholic beverages to obviously intoxicated persons The mission of the police department's inspection program is to provide verification to the city council that Edina's liquor ordinance is being observed, so that the citizens can in turn be assured that the youth of our city will not have access to alcohol through restaurants and stores in Edina. We would like to be able to report to the council that we had no violations during this upcoming inspection period. We hope this notification is helpful in reducing the number of violations. Please feel free to call me or our alcohol /tobacco compliance officer, Sgt. Tom Draper (952- 826- 1601), with any questions or concerns. Edina Police Department Administration (952) 826 -1610 4801 West 50th Street Fax (952) 826 -1607 Edina, Minnesota Police 24 hr. and TDD Line (952) 826 -1600 55424 -1394 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Driver's Licenses and Identification Cards Effective January 31, 2000 11 OIR L -A4J i IDOMUO'�entcos -- ■7 LRhYY/aaC ��w7l+�II CHAS LAM 10 Te5TM AVE ��ANYTOWK MR 6514S I Over 21 Standard Driver's License H �. -11 CHAS LANDRY 10 TESTINO AVE fANYT0IVM, MR E9155 Over 21 Motorized Bicycle Permit CHAS 10 7nF4G A TE.9TNG V£ ANYTOWN. MR &5105 Over 21 Identification Card N.MM9MM � III CHAS LANDRY 10 IVAI Ma"s r�A/RYTOWN, MR $5135 1+14 pg- .ry -.7T7C In WYTOWN, ?AN 55155 Under 21 Standard Driver's Licensr 21st Birthday under 2D Bar Co" lath Birthday under 2D Bar Code i 10,1LU11NG AVL ANYTOWN,NN 55155 CY. Provisional Driver's License 21st Birir:day under 2D Bar Code 18th Birthday under 2D Bar Cade �1 A�N1YTVivrttup �1SS Under 21 Identification Card 21st Birthday under 2D Bar Code i8th Birthday under 20 Bar Cede sTATE RF miNNESO't=A t# � .. _. Q¢pa }r2ril�nt Qi'PUbIfD Sgie O CARD . NOT A I k .! i p�f rti1 w'61 1 tl ro �`.lr /�Ir v14'hyy`I L"'Jt vat Yl,` tiJ�':7� -. Instruction Permit B Card Please Note: The holographic loans will he seen only under ultraviolet light or if the card has been duplicated. 18th Birthday will he listed on Under 21 cards it applicable. Over 21 Standard Driver's License Minnesota holographic design - - _- Type of license Ghost image - Digital image on right 2D Bar Code - -� - --- - - - -- L ©® here, Personal _ _ ,' C i,,, 1'c toaazt �Y .IQO when appropriate Information Signature ;°N'µ „$ '- "-Printed license number Under 21 Standard Driver's License Minnesota holographic design n, ® .1 , Digital image CHASLArurrr on left ANYTOWKNW 55,06 Back of Standard Driver's License Snowflake holographic design -- Type of license Ghost image 2D Bar Code (contains full name, dates of birth & license number) -__ 21st birth date --18th birth date: (if applicable) — — Magnetically encoded stripe (contains the data can the front of the card) A-000- S18�00 -021 Name — .- C�xg ����Y - - - - - - �.,, �. LF ?aAhT�AA.E °T, �urr�esslww Printed license number, birth date, taw. vcur,w cw ono oanu vecclis RxcrFT °unn� [nrcKanull]: Iwennc +:sux7rrJr.la,uaroanm,F.2nu��� & organ donor rASZnccn, r_aro� cua, cuTxcTr,IOC° TaALDi q[alpl.`faket r,',r�0.REluf.p ;e;FTRJLt. Pnp4tln:w6. 1� _ _ _ _ •vrc.unc Tnucuszc.y nartrert wreo ultr, — - - -__ tWa .�`.' ° °`' =�""" Cardholder specific information CPLFAim LIMIT BUM CR.T.+]l, ClLYA1CO °a.4Cq :rlT 1 D Bar code'- (contains license number) ® A digital image of the cardholder is fused with heat into the card's plastic. ❑ Acolored border around the digital image prevents replacement and reveals tamperirxl attempts. [1 Each card has the size, shape, and flexibility of a standard credit card. ❑ The driver's license number and the date of birth appear five Lirnes each on the license. All must match for validation. ❑ Two Ear codes and a magnetically encoded stripe �-1 contain identification data- Coded information, including restrictions and endorsements, is specific to each cardholder. ❑ Two holographic designs on tho front of Lho card include the word 'Minnesota” and snowflakes. This prevents photocopying and fraudulent reproduction. © "Under 21" versions feature the digital image of the cardholder on the left rront and the cardholder's 21st birth date (and 18th birth date, if applicable) underneath the 2D Bar Code. "Over 21" versions feature the digital image on the right. ET = Senior Citizen Public Transit Reduced Fare 0 = Limited Mobility Medical Alert Q= Requires B Card ®= Designated Care Giver Minnesota Department of Public Safety Drivers' Licenses and Identification Cards Effective December 15, 2004 MINNEso *r Standard Driver's License DRIVER'S L T GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 'Sex Ego Clus BLU D H.Ight W.{phS ,7l'JYe:. '. 5 -08 150 ISSUED MINMESf)T INSTRUCTION PErZI(AIT GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET,NORTHWEST ' MINNEAPOLIS, NN 12345 -0000 oat. of 811th 05.22.198 -' T S.x Eye. - CIaN F BLU IP �'• Height Weight "doij El - - 5-08 150 SSUED 11-2003 EXPIRES 11 -11 -2004 D616603235374 ' Instruction Permit IDENTIFICATION E;As?�l I;t ; NUT A DRIVER'S W FrA �r. „ .y. A ' GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE -a (i - I D616603235374 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST ar MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Date of Birth J4 r1{ 11.2003 E70>IRES 05- 22.2007 0616603235374 F BLU ID Height Plight Q MINMESf)T INSTRUCTION PErZI(AIT GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET,NORTHWEST ' MINNEAPOLIS, NN 12345 -0000 oat. of 811th 05.22.198 -' T S.x Eye. - CIaN F BLU IP �'• Height Weight "doij El - - 5-08 150 SSUED 11-2003 EXPIRES 11 -11 -2004 D616603235374 ' Instruction Permit Identification Card MINNESOTA DRIVER'S k.'' COMMERCIAL' GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 jjj Sea Eye, Cie.$ + F BLU B Height Weight tNft 548 150 ` Issum 11 -2003 Ewmrs05- 22.2007 " D616603235374 � 0 - Standard Commercial Driver's License T DRIVER'S LICENSE f GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE X123 MAIN STREET,NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Dat. of Biro, )S -*4904 Su Eya Vill... F BLU O Haight WaigM DbNOR 5.0 150 EISSUED 11 -2003p EXPIRES 05.22 -2005 D616603235374 b-0 A Under 21 Standard Driver's License IDENTIFICATION E;As?�l I;t ; NUT A DRIVER'S W FrA �r. „ .y. A ' GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE -a (i - I D616603235374 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST ar MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Date of Birth J4 r1{ •. Sex Eye. CI... ,i F BLU ID Height Plight Q 5 08 150 - ISSUED 1"1-22,0,03 >2',I.J7 EEXPIPES{l5 D616603235374 " o Identification Card MINNESOTA DRIVER'S k.'' COMMERCIAL' GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 jjj Sea Eye, Cie.$ + F BLU B Height Weight tNft 548 150 ` Issum 11 -2003 Ewmrs05- 22.2007 " D616603235374 � 0 - Standard Commercial Driver's License T DRIVER'S LICENSE f GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE X123 MAIN STREET,NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Dat. of Biro, )S -*4904 Su Eya Vill... F BLU O Haight WaigM DbNOR 5.0 150 EISSUED 11 -2003p EXPIRES 05.22 -2005 D616603235374 b-0 A Under 21 Standard Driver's License 0616603235374 I N N S S OT: t IDENTIFICATION Ca NOT A DRIVER'S LICEN GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Dae of Birth 05.224084 Sex Eye. Cl... F BLU ID Height Weight 5 -08 150 Ssueu 11 -2003 EXPIRES a ?2- G05 Y_ Under 21 Identification Card ;Zllla N - MOTORIZED BICYCLE " GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN12345-0000 DA. of Birth 05 -2244 Su Eyes TIN. h F BLU rB Height W.igM DdvbR Sae 150 1ssuED 11 -20038 EXPIRES 05 -22 -2005 D616603235374 Under 21 Motorized Bicycle Permit rl [sr h� /le _ ervices NNESOT. I;t ; ►RIVER'S L#Cel;r ` pgnylct0• +�1 „ .y. A GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS MN 12345 -0000 -a (i - I D616603235374 Date o1 Birth , , -9::' AGE IS -Sex Eyes Class F BLU D Height Weight Q 5 -08 150 ISSUED 11.2003 EXPIRES 11 -11 -7005 Under 18 Provisional Driver's License 0616603235374 I N N S S OT: t IDENTIFICATION Ca NOT A DRIVER'S LICEN GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Dae of Birth 05.224084 Sex Eye. Cl... F BLU ID Height Weight 5 -08 150 Ssueu 11 -2003 EXPIRES a ?2- G05 Y_ Under 21 Identification Card ;Zllla N - MOTORIZED BICYCLE " GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN12345-0000 DA. of Birth 05 -2244 Su Eyes TIN. h F BLU rB Height W.igM DdvbR Sae 150 1ssuED 11 -20038 EXPIRES 05 -22 -2005 D616603235374 Under 21 Motorized Bicycle Permit rl [sr h� /le _ ervices Macro printing Type of card (Minnesota) �Y /%I NNESO i . . Digital image with DRIVER'S L10E1 fine line printing CAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345-0000 D.. 0 BIM 05- $•1998 Sax Ey.. tin. 3 F BLU 0 ❑ Printed card number OIL 5 -0e ISO 03NOR "' ISSUED 11.2003 EIPIs 05 -22 -2007 4.14A m STATUS 0616603235374 0ei44M 00' Donor designation Standard Driver's License Status Check (when appropriate) Rainbow print pattern-- - ' INNESOTA `fn. Under 21 <# °5` �- •W DRIVER'S siolNaC GAYLE ELIZABETH SAMPLE _ 123 MAIN STREET NORTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 12345 -0000 Indicators, R Day. of BIM J• "? -!Jy7 AGE16:'' S.x Ey.. CI- appropriate F BLU D F S HN0M w5 (see next column) M 150 -6, ISSUED 11 -2003 EXE 11- 11.2005 ISSUED �NA 0616603235374 Under 21 Provisional Driver's License 18th Birthday indicator (when appropriate) Magnetic Stripe — (contains all the data on the front of the card) 1 D Barcode (contains license number) Cardholder- specific information (Endorsements /Restrictions) i .�• - F— TRUCKAN—GLE Nff mft- I Y P7. X,0.1 L.a GVWNG .1, CE" BU— Ion 2ESTRKTIOYD. YaFE U-1 .1111 oi�vw Living Will /Healthcare Back of Standard Driver's License Directive, Firearm Safety and Snowmobile 2D Barcode Status Check Safety indicators (contains full name, date (when appropriate) (when appropriate) of birth and card number) Retroreflective Virtual Image 3M Confirm Laminate (LadySlipper flower repeated) Virtual Image in Laminate ■ Each card is the size and shape of a standard credit card but is more flexible and has a somewhat different texture. m On the front of the card, a virtual image of a loon appears to float above or sink below the surface as the viewing angle changes. a A digital image of the cardholder is fused with heat into the card plastic. Fine line printing over the image reveals tampering attempts. The image always appears on the left. u A red border around the image indicates "Under 21." ci If the cardholder is under 18, date of 18th birthday appears in red. ■ "Status Check" indicates a temporary visitor to the United States and the date the cardholder's authorized presence in this country is expected to end. a Information, including restrictions and endorse- ments, is specific to each cardholder. ■ A holographic state seal that appears on the front of the card is visible only under ultraviolet light. Indicators on front of card: DA Metro Mobility TM Senior Citizen Public Transit Reduced Fare © Limited Mobility OM Medical Alert © Standby or Temporary Custodian Minnesota Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 www.mndrivoinfo.org PENALTY MATRIX 900.15 Sanctions for License Violations. Subd. 1 Purpose. The purpose of this Subsection is to establish a standard by which the Council shall determine the length of license suspensions and the propriety of revocations. This section shall apply to all premises licensed under this Section and the penalties herein shall be presumed to be appropriate. The Council may deviate from the presumptive penalty when it finds that there exists extenuating or aggravating reasons to deviate, including, but not limited to a licensee's efforts, in combination with the state or the city, to prevent the sale of alcohol of minors. When deviating from these standards, the Council shall provide written findings supporting the penalty selected. Subd. 2 . Hearing Notice. No sanction under this Subsection shall take effect until the licensee has been given the opportunity for a hearing has been held in accordance with M.S. 340A.415 and M.S. 14.57 to 14.69 of the Administrative Procedures Act. The Council may appoint a hearing examiner or may conduct a hearing itself. The hearing notice shall be given at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, include notice of the time and place of the hearing, and state the nature of the charges against the licensee. For first violations, for which the presumptive penalty is a fine, the license holder may, at any time prior to the hearing, pay the fine and waive the right to a hearing. Subd. 3 Presumed Penalties for Violations. Type of Violation 1st Violation 2nd Violation 3rd Violation 4th Violation Commission of a Revocation N/A - N/A N/A felony related to the licensed activity Sale of alcoholic Revocation N/A N/A N/A beverages while license is under suspension Adult Revocation N/A N/A N/A entertainment Sale of Revocation N/A N/A N/A intoxicating liquor where only licensed for 3.2 0 percent malt liquor Refusal to allow $1,000.00 fine $2,000.00 fine Revocation N/A City inspectors or and 3 day and 7 day police admission suspension suspension to inspect premises Sale of alcoholic $500.00 fine $1,000.00 fine $2,000.00 and Revocation beverages to and 3 day 7 day underage person I suspension suspension After /before $500.00 fine $1,000.00 fine $2,000.00 fine Revocation hours sale of and 3 day and 7 day alcoholic suspension suspension beverage After hours $500.00 fine. $1,000.00 fine $2,000 fine and Revocation consumption of and 3 day 7 day alcoholic suspension suspension beverages Illegal gambling $500.00 fine $1,000.00 fine $2,000.00 fine Revocation or prostitution on and 3 day and 7 day premises suspension suspension Failure to take $500.00 fine $1,000.00 fine $2,000.00 fine Revocation reasonable steps and 3 day and 7 day to stop person suspension suspension from leaving premises with alcoholic beverage Sale of alcoholic $500.00 fine • $1,000.00 fine $2,000.00 fine Revocation beverage to and 3 day and 7 day obviously suspension suspension intoxicated person Allowing a $500.00 fine $1,000.00 fine $2,000.00 fine Revocation disorderly and 3 day and 7 day establishment suspension suspension Person under 18 $500.00 fine $1,000.00 fine $2,000.00 fine Revocation serving liquor and 3 day and 7 day suspension . suspension. Failure to display Warning - letter $500.00 fine $1,000.00 fine $1,500.00 fine liquor license Failure to meet $500 fine; a $1,000 fine; a Revocation and requirement of twelve month twelve month license holder is 60% of gross probationary probationary barred from receipts from sale license; license; holding future of food and non- development of development of liquor licenses alcoholic a plan to a plan to for a period of beverages achieve achieve not more than compliance compliance twenty four within one within one months. year, with a year, with a Subd. 4 Other Penalties. When the penalty for violations of this Section or an applicable statute, ordinance, or rule regarding alcoholic beverages is without a presumptive penalty, the penalty shall be determined by the Council. Subd. 5 Multiple Violations. At a licensee's first appearance before the Council, the Council must act upon all of the violations that have been alleged in the notice sent to the licensee. The Council shall consider the presumptive penalty for each violation under the first appearance column in this Subsection. The occurrence of multiple violations is grounds for deviation from the presumed penalties in the Council's discretion. Subd. 6 Subsequent Violations. A violation occurring after the notice of hearing has been mailed, but prior to the hearing, must be treated as a separate violation and dealt with as a second appearance before the Council, unless the Manager and licensee agree in writing to add the violation to the first appearance. The same procedure applies to the second, third, or fourth appearance. Subd. 7 Subsequent Appearances. Upon a second or subsequent appearance before the Council by the same licensee, the Council shall impose the presumptive penalty for the violation or violations giving rise to the particular violation or violations that were the subject of the prior appearance. However, the Council may consider the amount of time elapsed between appearances as a basis for deviating from the presumptive penalty imposed by this Subsection. Subd. 8 Computation of Violations. Violations are computed as follows: A. Any violation which has occurred within twenty -four (24) months of the current violation shall be counted. B. Nothing in this Subsection shall restrict or limit the authority of the Council to suspend a license up to sixty (60) days, revoke the a license, impose a civil fee not to exceed $2,000.00, to impose conditions on a license, or take any other action in accordance with law, provided that the license holder has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing in the manner provided under this Subsection. monitoring visit monitoring visit I at 6 montl at 6 months. Subd. 4 Other Penalties. When the penalty for violations of this Section or an applicable statute, ordinance, or rule regarding alcoholic beverages is without a presumptive penalty, the penalty shall be determined by the Council. Subd. 5 Multiple Violations. At a licensee's first appearance before the Council, the Council must act upon all of the violations that have been alleged in the notice sent to the licensee. The Council shall consider the presumptive penalty for each violation under the first appearance column in this Subsection. The occurrence of multiple violations is grounds for deviation from the presumed penalties in the Council's discretion. Subd. 6 Subsequent Violations. A violation occurring after the notice of hearing has been mailed, but prior to the hearing, must be treated as a separate violation and dealt with as a second appearance before the Council, unless the Manager and licensee agree in writing to add the violation to the first appearance. The same procedure applies to the second, third, or fourth appearance. Subd. 7 Subsequent Appearances. Upon a second or subsequent appearance before the Council by the same licensee, the Council shall impose the presumptive penalty for the violation or violations giving rise to the particular violation or violations that were the subject of the prior appearance. However, the Council may consider the amount of time elapsed between appearances as a basis for deviating from the presumptive penalty imposed by this Subsection. Subd. 8 Computation of Violations. Violations are computed as follows: A. Any violation which has occurred within twenty -four (24) months of the current violation shall be counted. B. Nothing in this Subsection shall restrict or limit the authority of the Council to suspend a license up to sixty (60) days, revoke the a license, impose a civil fee not to exceed $2,000.00, to impose conditions on a license, or take any other action in accordance with law, provided that the license holder has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing in the manner provided under this Subsection. a ,v v6o • \`bra REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -87 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2012 -87 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-87 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center Rhonda Hartman 23 Pieces of Pottery For Sale At Future Art Fairs Bob Brum Nine Art & Illustration Books Glen Lacher Large Framed Oil Painting Pinstripes Edina Hosting /Food & Beverage — Edina Public Art Committee Sculpture Exhibition Opening Edina Communication & Technology Services Department: Edina Chamber of Commerce Americana Decor July 4th Parade Broadcast Decorations Edina Police Department: AAA $1,500.00 Dated: June 19, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Aid In Distracted Driving Program James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street a Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov a 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 0Aa REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL - Agenda Item City Council VIII. B & HRA III. From: Scott Neal City Manager ® Action Discussion Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: Amendment No. 1 to Southdale Redevelopment Agreement ACTION REQUESTED: Consider Amendment No. 1 to Southdale Redevelopment Agreement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: On April 17, 2012, the City Council approved Resolutions 2012 -58, 2012 -66 and 2012 -67 approving the Southdale Redevelopment Agreement with Simon Property Group. Following the action by the City Council, the agreement was executed by the City and delivered to Simon Property Group's corporate offices in Indianapolis, Indiana for execution by their corporate officers. Instead of executing the agreement, however, Simon's corporate officers raised objections to a provision in the agreement — Section 4.6 — which bars Simon from appealing the market value of the Southdale Center property during the term of the agreement. The language of Section 4.6 from the approved agreement is as follows: APPROVED Section 4.6 Assessment Agreement. During the term of this Agreement and the Minimum Improvements Loan Agreement, Redeveloper agrees that the Market Value of the.Mall Property for real estate tax purposes shall be $110,000,000 beginning January 1, 2012, and increasing 2.5% per annum, and Redeveloper agrees not to appeal the Market Value of the Mall Property. Upon execution of this Agreement, Redeveloper and City will execute the Assessment Agreement, attached as Exhibit F. The Assessment Agreement must be recorded no later than June 30, 2012. Failure to record the Assessment Agreement by June 30, 2012 shall be a Redeveloper Event of Default under this Agreement. Simon representatives have proposed an amendment to Section 4.6. The amendment removes the bar to appealing the market valuation, but agrees to a 4.3% increase in valuation from year 1 to Year 2 of the agreement before settling into the agreed upon 2.5% annual value increases, which are part of the of the approved agreement. The proposed amendment, shown below, also restricts Simon's appeal rights to appealing only that portion of any valuation increase that exceeds the 2.5% annual growth. PROPOSED Section 4.6. Assessment Agreement. During the term of this Agreement and the Minimum Improvements Loan Agreement, Redeveloper agrees that the Market Value of the Mall Property for real estate tax purposes shall be $115,000,000 for January 1, 2012, and $120,000,000 beginning January 1, 2013, and increasing 2.5% per annum in each year thereafter, and Redeveloper agrees not to appeal the Market Value of the Mall Property unless and only to the extent that it is -greater than such agreed -upon amount. Upon execution of this Agreement, Redeveloper and City will execute the Assessment Agreement, attached as Exhibit F. The Assessment Agreement must be recorded no later than June 30, 2012. Failure to record the Assessment Agreement by June 30, 2012 shall be a Redeveloper Event of Default under this Agreement. There are a number of factors Council Members should reflect on when considering your decision on this matter: 1. The proposed amendment does not affect the security of the City's tax increment relationship with Simon. The security for the TIF debt is as strong with the proposed language as it is with the approved language. 2. Does the proposed amendment create unreasonable logistical or administrative burdens for the City? Does it create equity issues among other property owners? 3. Is the proposed amendment from Simon reasonable? Does the proposed amendment restrict the City from valuing the mall at its true market rate? 4. Does the City risk spoiling a budding relationship with Simon Property Group by rejecting this proposed amendment? 5. If the proposed amendment is not approved, will Simon proceed with the proposed improvements? The City and Simon are facing a June 30 deadline to reach an agreement on the market value of the Southdale property. Therefore, if the Council desires to accommodate the proposed amendment, it must make a decision on the matter at the June 19 Council meeting. I have invited the City's legal and financial advisors to attend the Council meeting in order to assist the City with a discussion of the proposed amendment and its ramifications. In order for a proposed amendment to become effective, it must be also be adopted by the City's HRA. An HRA meeting will be scheduled at the end of the Council meeting on June 19 to consider the same action. 0 e 1888 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.C. From: Scott Neal City Manager ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -91 Authorizing Application For Grant Funds For Completion Of Edina Promenade Phase III And IV ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2012- 91certifying that project funds are available and committed to complete Phase III and Phase IV of the Edina Promenade Project and authorizing Mayor Hovland and City Manager Neal to apply for funds under the Business Development Capital Grants Program administered by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Legislature approved bonding bill on May 11, 2012. The bonding bill included $47.5 million for Business Development Capital Projects Grants. The grant prograrn is administered by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), the state's principal economic development agency. Applicants are required to adopt a resolution certifying that project funds are available and committed to complete the project and authorizing the application prior to the submission of the application materials. Staff has chosen to submit the Edina Promenade project because of synergies between the projects goals and the Business Development Capital Project Grants intentions. The Promenade project provides health and safety benefits for the area's residents, employees and visitors; the public investment is intended to spur private investment; the capacity to attract out of state revenue to the area; the completion of the project increasing the livability of the area; expected long term increase in local tax base; the high number of residents served by and benefiting from the project; and the demonstration of local support for the project. Tax Increment Funds are already planned to be used for the project in the 2012 Capital Improvement Plan. If the project is chosen by DEED, up to 50% of the project funds would be matched. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2012 -91 Minnesota Business Development Capital Projects Grant Program (RFP) Pages 88 & 89 Of Edina Capital Improvements Plan — Phase III and IV Edina Promenade Project RESOLUTIOITNO. 2012 -91 AUTHORIZING BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS GRANT APPLICATION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina act as the legal sponsor for Phase III and Phase IV of the Edina Promenade Project contained in the Business Development Capital Projects Grant Program Application to be submitted on June 2I `h, 2012 and that Mayor Hovland and City Manager Neal are hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf'of the City of Edina. BE IT.FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina has -the legal authority to apply for.financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial:capability.to, ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed. project for its useful life. BE IT FURTHER.RESOLVED that the City of Edina has not violated any federal, state, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Edina, may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above- referenced project, and the City of Edina certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all non -state funding is committed and available and meets or exceeds the requirement that the non -state match equal or exceeds the state funding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and rules of General Obligation bond funds. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager, or their successors in office, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments thereto, as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Dated: June 19, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) '; COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of CITY OF EDINA City Clerk 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov.'952- 927 -8861 a Fax 952-826-0390 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # HjgA -11 -001 Project Name Promenade Phase IV Type Improvement Useful Life Category Unassigned Department HRA Contact City Manager Priority n/a 2012 thne 2016 Status Active ion pedestrian upgrades to the intersections along France Avenue. Justification The intersections along France Avenue do not encourage pedestrian movement along the corridor; this project would enhance these crossings. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total 11000,000 11000,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Tax Increment Funds 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total 1,004000 11004000 Page 88 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # HRA -11 -002 Project Name Promenade Phase III 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department HRA Useful Life Contact City Manager Category Unassigned Priority n/a Status Active Description Complete the westerly, Promenade section south of Hazelton Road. Justification The westerly section of pathway was placed as a bituminous pathway until the properties to the west of the Promenade are redeveloped. The plan also includes a substantial water feature along this corridor. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total 2,000,000 2,000,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Tax Increment Funds 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total 2,000,000 2000,000 Page 89 ow e W rode REPORPRECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. A. DEBRA MANGEN F-1 Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion Information Date: JUNE 19, 2012 Subject:. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 10:18 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Policy ob re- contruction of city streets Lynette Biunno, Receptionist { 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 s. •; ��'`" IbiunnoCo)EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov �...,,; ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6i Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: nashiohrftC aol.com fmailto:nashiohnn0)aol.com1 Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 10:15 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Policy ob re- contruction of city streets We suggest that the Mayor and council members review the policy and compare it to other suburbs! Is it fair for the residents and the city? Sharon and John Nash 6400 Gleason Court Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl Subject: Resolutions to overturn /undo Citizens United Supreme Court decision Mayor Hovland, Greetings to you Jim and I hope the.summer is treating you well! It was good to see you at Arneson Acres and at the O'Brian's for Ms. Franzen's fund raiser, and I believe at each of those occasions I briefly discussed the impact..ofthe Supreme Court's Citizens United case and my interest in working with the City Council to draft a resolution'opposing this decision. We are now beginning to see the effects of this decision with the massive amounts of money (often anonymous donations) flowing into federal and state elections. The recent recall vote in Wisconsin is an example very close to home, where Gov. Walker outspent Mayor Barrett by 7 to 1. Many grass roots, organizations are mobilizing local governments to approve'resolutions in favor of a Constitutional Amendment to overturn /undo this decision. Legislation has also been introduced into the Minnesota Legislature to`begin this process. On Wednesday the St. PauL.City council unanimously approved a resolution in favor of such a Constitutional .Amendment, and yesterday (Thursday) the City of Minneapolis City Council approved a similar resolution. Duluth had previously approved a resolution. Other cities /counties that have already passed resolutions include:'New York City "Los Angeles, Boulder, Co., Dane County, Wis. and about 200 others. On May 22 1 made a brief'presentation to the Edina Human Rights and Relations Committee where I outlined the impact of this decision and offered some background information to those members for their consideration. I will follow up, with'Ms. Kingston and the HRRC based on the actions of Minneapolis and St. Paul so that this can be moved to the Council as soon as practical. I would also like to meet with you in the near future to have a discussion on this topic and would prepare a packet of information for you, including the resolutions from Duluth, St. Paul and Minneapolis. I would also appreciate your guidance on how we can move this discussion through the council. With regards, Laird Beaver 5624 Melody Lake Drive 952 200 2358 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, June. 14, 2012 3:15 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina, compete in the Earth Hour City Challenge Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov i www.EdinaMN -gov ...For Living Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: World Wildlife Fund !mailto:ecomments @wwfus.orgI On Behalf Of Michael Carlin Sent: Thursday, June,14, 20121:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina, compete in the Earth Hour City Challenge Jun 14, 2012 Mayor James Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland, As a Edina resident, I'm writing to urge you to help protect my family and our city from the harmful consequences of increasingly extreme weather by participating in WWF's Earth Hour City Challenge, a competition among cities to prepare for a changing climate. More and more, communities in Minnesota are facing heavier precipitation and dangerous flooding. We aren't alone. Cities throughout our country are on the front lines of increasingly extreme weather, from more intense heat waves and wildfires to droughts, rainstorms, and floods. As climate change worsens, dangerous weather events are getting more frequent or severe - or both. But our city can take practical measures at the local level to prepare for these weather extremes, protecting us from more costly and dangerous problems in the future. Infrastructure improvements and other.proactive actions will save us money and keep our families and communities safer and healthier. How is our city preparing for these climatic changes? And are we doing enough? With this letter I challenge our city to compete in WWF's Earth Hour City Challenge! I hope you will participate and protect my family and fellow residents by preparing for the increasingly extreme weather our community is already facing. Learn more at worldwiIdlife .org /citychaIlenge. Sincerely, Mr. Michael Carlin 6901 Hillcrest Ln Edina, MN 55435 -1605 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:48 PM To: Susan Faus Cc: Susan Howl; Ann Kattreh; John Keprios Subject: FW: Pool and Track at Edinborough Park Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Susan Faus, Ann Kattreh and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ?p1 IbiunnoCrDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdlnaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town working to make the healthy choice the easy choicel From: STRAND,PHYLLIS STRAND,PHYLLIS [mailto:phyllisj35(�bmsn.com1 Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:06 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Pool and Track at Edinborough Park I am writing to show my support for retaining the pool and track at Edinborough Park. I believe both the pool and track are a benefit to our community. I use the track during the winter months when the weather makes it difficult to walk outside and also during the summer months if it is raining. While walking on the track I notice there seems to be quite a few people using the pool for swimming classes for children, water exercise classes and also just those who wish to swim laps. I think it would be a shame and very unfair to some of the elderly people who live at Edinborough who would not be able to go elsewhere to exercise. Thank you. Phyllis Strand 7520 Edinborough Way, #2213 Edina, MN 55435 Susan Hbwl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf vr Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, June 1o.001oo:oaPw Cc: """"`""= Subject: FW: Sound Wall .` Receptionist 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 ... For Living, Teucoinx Raising Families & Doing Business Please , note mmy new email anumoa . We're a doAown— working to make the healthy choicA, the easy choice! _ From: Dan Sent: VVed June 13,2O133:23PM . To Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; Subject: Sound Wall Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council | was wondering ifthere is any long term planning for sound walls on Highway lOO. | live on the S9DO block of Josephine Ave. Since Highway 1OO was expanded, the noise has also increased. A large stretch of the highway has sound walls but rny area dmesn't. |s there any planning to add sound walls along highway 1OO7 Sincerely, Dan King 59O5 Josephine Ave. 1 Dear Mayor Jim Hovland, I am writing you this letter today. Am I doing not of walking around centennial lakes park, to target and Byerly's. You have that cross walk on Hazelton Rd. I sur push the botton so that the light will flash for the people that are driving the.cars. On June 4 2012. 1 was crossing on that crosswalk the light's was flashing on of the car did not stop the car was speeding. The other person in the.other car could have hit me if I was out in the crosswalk little more. After she had drove thought the crosswalk and saw that I was in the crosswalk and little bite. Inside her car she put.her hand s up and now that she had done something wrong. They are not looking at the light flash or if people are in the cross walking at all. Some time people do not push that botton . The drives are on the cell phone and do not care to stop there for a few seconds. Sur people in their car are also speed in down that road. On Sunday is pass weekend I was again walking over there. There three people were crossing that crosswalk on Hazelton Rd the person in that car did not even stop. They did pushso that the.ligh&..would flash. I have heard that people are . walking hear at night and people are not stopping at this cross walk when they even have children in strollers pushing their kids. Something is going;to happen very bad here sur if you do not get a cop there all the time You need to get more, cops in your city if people are not driving like they are to be driving sur. Her is'my name and my phone, number l,would like to talk to you about this Jim Hovland. The best time of daywould'be for me -about 2:00-pm I am at home then. Here is my phone 612 - 866 -4512. My name Is Patty Murphy I'hope that you will give me a call I am walking a lot over there., Lot to long to walk from my house. Well thank you for reading this Mayor Jim Hovland . I am just'very concerned person. You also have seniors walking over a lot as well. Mayor Jim -Hovland you have agood day now sur. 7�7ov �Cf Susan Howl Subject: Edina Housing Statistics - May 2012 Good Afternoon, Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council — Attached please find the most recent housing statistics from the Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS@, for the City of Edina and the Twin Cities metro area as a whole. This report describes our market in May 2012. Please let me know if you have any questions. As a reminder, if you are interested in seeing more in- depth statistics and figures for your city, or other cities and counties in the metro — please feel free to check out our online statistical reports at www.mpisrealtor.com. The Thing, our interactive market analytics'tool, is very useful, as it offers many choices of variables for your review. Check. it out here: http : / /thething.mplsrealtor.com/ (June 12, 2012) — The month of May provided another confirmation that the Twin Cities metropolitan area's housing market continues to positively lean toward market recovery. During the month, buyers signed 5,130 purchase agreements, 27.3 percent higher than last May, and sellers introduced 6,599 properties to the market, 6.0 percent less than May 2011. This combination of activity drove down the number of homes for sale on the market to 17,262, down 31.1 percent. The median sales price was up 10.5 percent from last May to $169,000. That's the third - largest jump since January 2004. Prices have risen 22.5 percent since February (from $138,000 to $169,000). Home prices are now at their highest level since October 2010. Prices are "melting up" because distressed properties now comprise a smaller share of overall sales. Since traditional homes sell for a median price of $205,000, foreclosures sell for $116,350 and short sales go for $135,000, these shifts have translated into notable overall price gains. Distressed homes (short sales and foreclosures) made up 31.1 percent of all new listings and 39.4 percent of all closed sales - the smallest shares since June 2008 and September 2008, respectively. Traditional sales made up the remaining 60.6 percent of all closings and sold for 76.2 percent more than foreclosures. The number of homes for sale has dropped for 16 consecutive months, down 31.1 percent from last May to 17,262 active listings — the lowest inventory reading for any month since January 2004. "Residential home prices have been increasing steadily," said Cari Linn, President of the Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS@. "It's been a positive change for our local housing market and it's been a long time coming." Julia Parenteau Public Affairs Director Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS@ p. (952) 988 -3124 e: juliapCv�mplsrealtor.com RE Ais6 Local Market Update -- May 2012 A RESFAROH TOOL Pr1C7Vlpl. D BY'FHE. MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORSN MINNEAPOEiS AREA As --lion ^! 'REALTORS' 134 143 633 +6.7% +54.5% New Listings Closed Sales +16.1% +46.4% New Listings Closed Sales V. -h .,. iL. rl..i.,., n r.•w1 t:.:r. , .J . t J ,:, t",, .n a . ,.r u, n 9 .:. ; .cr .N tv.e..1,:i..,a i r.,...r d¢a. .I 1,s .., nr�o := hat u vr . t ha 0. r ^ 7P :K..:. - 1 .z F• � +•'o ' nr;: d"!iT. "j ltial pen ^o - "U'r..ut zo... Jiriir, a z6 t2. AR itstnir - i R^lio;I IIG1,'• if) ln?:ou; +y o r :.J by' Gb ii...,iu.r-.: 1 ,. Jt•, w q. Si., m.,70-d tuy t.:,a .r, .,+� ..... , -o + 6.7% + 54.5% +0.4% ............................................................................................. Change in Change in ............................... Change in Edina New Listings Closed Sales Median Sales Price May Year to Date 2011 2012 + / - 2011 2012 New Listings 134 143 +6.7% 545 633 +16.1% Closed Sales 55 85 +54.5% 222 325 +46.4% Median Sales Price` $353,900 $355,250 +0.4% $329,900 $318,000 -3.6% Average Sales Price' $423,015 $432,637 +2.3% $439,818 $439,379 -0.1% Price Per Square Foot' $152 $159 +4.5% $160 $154 -4.0% Percent of Original List Price Received' 90.5% 93.6% +3.4% 89.3% 90.9% +1.8% Days on Market Until Sale 135 125 -7.4% 168 164 -2.6% Inventory of Homes for Sale 437 372 -14.9% -- -- - Months Supply of Inventory 8.0 5.2 -34.9% -- - • Door Atai,:lty IDr or:C month Crl GfL111J iJnt U 1?tJ iJ tnut 5rnall eampla sae May 2011 ■2012 Year to Date 2011 02012 134 143 633 +6.7% +54.5% New Listings Closed Sales +16.1% +46.4% New Listings Closed Sales V. -h .,. iL. rl..i.,., n r.•w1 t:.:r. , .J . t J ,:, t",, .n a . ,.r u, n 9 .:. ; .cr .N tv.e..1,:i..,a i r.,...r d¢a. .I 1,s .., nr�o := hat u vr . t ha 0. r ^ 7P :K..:. - 1 .z F• � +•'o ' nr;: d"!iT. "j ltial pen ^o - "U'r..ut zo... Jiriir, a z6 t2. AR itstnir - i R^lio;I IIG1,'• if) ln?:ou; +y o r :.J by' Gb ii...,iu.r-.: 1 ,. Jt•, w q. Si., m.,70-d tuy t.:,a .r, .,+� ..... , -o Local Market Update - May 2012 A RF..SG'ARC;11 '1'00L PROVIDED BY 1'1 IF. MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORSN,) MINNF.AVOL.IS AREA Al RCia[i ?:1 .t REAI..TORS' 7,022 6,599 32,154 30,109 -6.0% +20.5% New Listings Closed Sales -6.4% +17.5% New Listings Closed Sales :... e...,,_.,c,......r,,.... .,,. ....:..:;i, : . . : . : p. ,:�! :�,,. Yr u_ `il ?" q . .r.7..,:1 Ir-: L.. , a: 7., .::W C cnt� c ui1 U:at l.: . ar,t;;uwn . L A;.hl, !',Ti hsri;;n•,1„.1:,!It 1:,::.: .. r,_... „I Prv¢' ^r;; C:Y psi + C. x cAw N[ iir;7 i F i ry iri;YN Gr ;!;t ilru =:n t /fin 'i:Y <'Yi.rQi.0::1 -6.0% +20.5% +10.5% Twin Cities ............. -- ................. ................ Change in ........ ................... .................. Change in ........... ........ ......... -- ............. ... Change in New Listings .............. . ............................... ......................... Closed Sales ............... .......................... Median Sales Price .................... ........................ ..: Region May Year to Date 2011 2012 + / - 2011 2012 New Listings 7,022 6,599 -6.0% 32,154 30,109 -6.4% Closed Sales 3,807 4,589 +20.5% 14,932 17,543 +17.5% Median Sales Price- $153,000 $169,000 +10.5% $145,000 $154,900 +6.8% Average Sales Price' $194,610 $207,873 +6.8% $186,592 $195,288 +4.7% Price Per Square Foot' $94 $100 +6.2% $91 $94 +2.9% Percent of Original List Price Received' 91.1% 94.5% +3.8% 89.5% 92.7% +3.5% Days on Market Until Sale 155 125 -19.6% 158 137 -13.3% Inventory of Homes for Sale 25,037 17,262 -31.1% -- -- Months Supply of Inventory �Doc- 8.3 4.5 -45.6% - .. - 1101 .1GCOL'r,l °:o, sollcl C'1r:(;nq�;,ir1r. ! A.-Ah i1'v hr ono rn,,tin111 C.lrl StirCI :111:8 WGh [!w.;1]1 ?!v MI. TO S`:ali ser:1F',1:` s,'r! May 2011 .2012 Year to Date 2011 .2012 7,022 6,599 32,154 30,109 -6.0% +20.5% New Listings Closed Sales -6.4% +17.5% New Listings Closed Sales :... e...,,_.,c,......r,,.... .,,. ....:..:;i, : . . : . : p. ,:�! :�,,. Yr u_ `il ?" q . .r.7..,:1 Ir-: L.. , a: 7., .::W C cnt� c ui1 U:at l.: . ar,t;;uwn . L A;.hl, !',Ti hsri;;n•,1„.1:,!It 1:,::.: .. r,_... „I Prv¢' ^r;; C:Y psi + C. x cAw N[ iir;7 i F i ry iri;YN Gr ;!;t ilru =:n t /fin 'i:Y <'Yi.rQi.0::1 June 4, 2012 James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear James, VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL If you're a Minnesotan, you know Southdale mall. In fact, it's difficult to find a local who isn't aware of the mall and its historical significance. It was very encouraging to our team to hear that at long last, at nearly 56 years of age, Southdale- -the world's first enclosed shopping center - -is getting a new look. At Kids Quest/Cyber Quest we have been watching the story evolve and read that the Simon Property Management Group, together with the city of Edina, will be giving the mall a much - needed facelift. If all goes according to plan, there will be a stronger customer base and a new generation of shoppers walking the halls acid patronizing its stores, restaurants, and other amenities. At Kids Quest/Cyber Quest we have a bit of a history as well. Having just celebrated our 20 -year anniversary, Kids Quest is the largest hourly child care provider in the country. In addition, our parent company, locally owned and operated New Horizon Academy /Kinderberry Hill, has a 40 -year foundation of educating children in the state of Minnesota. Kids Quest operates in 12 states, entertains over a half million children a year, and has provided over 27 million hours of care since we began in 1992. Our mission is to care for children while providing a safe, supervised, and fun entertainment experience for little ones while their parents visit other resort amenities at our host properties. With the renovation of Southdale becoming a reality, we see an opportunity for a partnership between Kids Quest/Cyber Quest and the shopping center. We whole- heartedly agree that there should be a play area for families to enjoy, but we also believe there should be a place for parents to take their children when they want time to themselves. This could mean a number of things, but shopping without a child in tow makes for a more leisurely retail excursion and ultimately a more profitable experience for the retailers who call Southdale home. We can also lend the necessary support for date nights at Southdale. Movies, restaurants, and special events are easier to enjoy if children are at Kids Quest where they have fun activities in a place to call their very own. Cyber Quest, our non - violent family arcade, is also a potential addition to Southdale. At Cyber Quest we provide a supervised, well- lit, bright, and clean arcade atmosphere for our guests. Children over the age of 12 are admitted to play without an adult; those under the age of 12 must be accompanied by someone over the age of 21. Finally, Kids Quest/Cyber Quest also splits our profits with our host properties —thus creating a simultaneous stream of revenue for the mall. Our concept in a retail setting is currently being discussed by The Boulevard Mall and Town Square in Las Vegas. Why not add Southdale, Simon Properties, and the City of Edina to that group of retail centers who are going the extra mile for their clientele? We are confident that we cAn enhance the experience of your guests and their children while helping you attain a healthy bottom line. Please review the enclosed materials that explain our concepts. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me and I will be happy to assist you. In addition, the fact that we are Plymouth -based would make for an effortless meeting! Best rds, Ann Zenor Kids Quest/Cyber Quest Development M: \Development \AAA- Summary of Mailings \Southdale Letter.doc Kids Quest • 3405 Annapolis Lane N. • Suite 100 • Plymouth, MN 55447 • (763) 557 -1111 • Fax: (763) 383 -8101 • kidsquest.com VILLAGE HOMES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. 33UU hdmborough Way 11,1U1 Edina, MN 55435 Telephone: 952 -831 -8325 Fax: 952- 253 -3352 Website: www.laukka.com Email: cork @laukka.com June 11, 2012 Edina City Council, Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council, We, the Board of Directors of the Centennial Lakes Condominium Association, are asking you to keep the pool & track open at Edinborough Park for the following reasons. Swimming and/or water exercise has these health benefits: • promotes flexibility, joint mobility and coordination • increases muscular endurance, strength and aerobic capacity • often recommended by physicians for rehabilitation after illnesses and/or injuries • may be the only exercise possible for seniors and/or "baby boomers" who have health concerns • can be a lifelong aerobic activity • helps build friendships, connections with neighbors & a sense of community • encourages visits to Edinborough Park, a multi - generational facility • enables healthy people to create healthy communities There are also financial considerations for maintaining access to this neighborhood pool: • for the past 22 years our 250 unit complex has paid $45,000 annually for park fees • this amenity enhances the property values of our association homeowners as well as that of our neighbors in the Edinborough condos, Coventry townhomes, Edina Park Plaza and Residence Inn who also pay yearly park fees. We certainly empathize with your difficult task of making ethical decisions regarding this and other challenging concerns. We alert you to this matter because we believe continuing access to this pool is very important to the well -being of our neighborhood. Thank you for all of hard work on behalf of the city of Edina and for your attention to this request. Sincerely, Board of Directors Village Homes of Centennial Lakes Condominium Association Susan Howl To: The Edina Park Board Edina City Council' Lakke Management Edinborough Condominiums Subject: Edinborough Park Expansion: concerning consultants' recommendations are to close the swimming pool, track and fitness area and repurpose those spaces with additional children's activities, birthday party locations, and office space. As owners, and payers of monthly association dues, we want to voice our comments and concern: We are opposed to the closing down of the pool, track and fitness center. We use the track and fitness center regularly when unable to go outside. We do not understand how you can consider taking away things that we have in an agreement with the association upon purchasing this condo and pay for on a regular monthly basis to use. Sincerely, Stephen and Melanie Bacon 7618 York Avenue South, #1117 Edina, MN 55435 1$ 651 - 260 -1841 melanieioybacon @gmail.com melanieioybacon.com 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edinborough Park Importance: High City of Edina City Council: Re: Edinborough Park Attn: Mayor Hovland Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Josh Sprague .. Ann Swenson As an Edina resident since 1979, I would be extremely disappointed to learn the City of Edina will invest MILLIONS of tax payer dollars into Southdale Mall, having the history of the 1st in- closed mall, Yet doesn't have the same pride to ensure the 1st in- closed City Park remains in providing fitness & wellness to many tax payers. I am saddened to know Council Member Sprague, who is a major supporter of changing the park is Board Member of the near by Southdale YMCA .... such a conflict of interest to use his elected position as a means to fulfill his fundraising goals for his personal involvement w/ the YMCA -- already achieving membership from his "scare tacit s" my elected officials have allowed. Shameful. How many of you do use the fitness center at the Park? I am there 6 days a week. I can tell you the demographics, the numbers & SHAME on you for thinking the active demographics want the change, you invested to HIRE an OUT OF STATE company to review. As a resident who's family has endowed THOUSANDS of dollars to the Edina Park system, I amisaddened, my City is more concerned in attracting 20% increase of attendees from OUT OF EDINA, than supporting the EDINA tax payers who have used the 1st in- closed park in this area. To state, more revenue would be gained from shifting, it to a commercial space, I ask ....SERIOUSLY, there are so many commercial spaces not filled, AKA SOUTHDALE, where you are giving a major loan to sustain -- yet not interested in doing the same for the adult community who prefers this fitness center, has SUPPORTEd this community facility & now isn't protecting our INVESTMENT of our tax & community dollars for the past 20 years, supporting this crown jewel of the Edina Park board. To support the gain of 1 council member's volunteer financial commitment, at the sacrifice of the active members who have ELECTED not to join the YMCA, tells me the City of Edina, is no longer interested in the good of many, & now more interested in supporting the interest of few, who use our TAX dollars to achieve their personal gain. Shame on you Edina City Council if you allow this shift. It will diminish my pride of being an active Edina resident, who has financially support the City, the park board, the golf course, the hockey rink, the City liquors & so many other areas I selected to support my local community. Funny, its the folks in power who don't "do as they say" by investing in the community gain, by allowing our City Council to be BOUGHT by our Council Members personal gain. I challenge you all to become active users of this facility .... to experience the community, the blending of all ages, imagine that ... its fulfilling the mission of the park board .... just leaves me asking, why do you not want to fulfill the community mission & remove a key facility that provides a sense of community to the pride of Edina's park system. nancylJohnson Susan Howl i From: L Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: M Monday, June 11, 20129:27 AM Cc: S Susan Howl Subject: F FW: GreenStep award . photos for Mayor Hovland Lynette Biunno, Rece y P / ;,K-.,r 952-927788611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunrio0)EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov ..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. Were a do.town ,corking to make the healthy choice the e chome! From: M�uessig, Philipp (MPCA) rmailto :philipp.muessig(dstate.mn.usl Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 6:59 PM To: Edina Mail.. Subject: GreenStep award photos for Mayor Hovland Dear Mayor Hovland, Thank you once again for being at the Environmental Initiative awards ceremony and joining the robust partnership in accepting.the GreenStep: awards! Here are a few pictures of us all. Hope to see you up in Duluth-, - Philipp http: / /bit.ly /J uVRcC Philipp Muessig GreenStep Cities Coordinator Assistance Division, MPCA 520 Lafayette Rd. N, 2nd floor St. Paul, MN 55155 651- 757 -2594 Philipp. muessig(cDstate. mn. us http://www.MnGreenStep.org 1 Susan Howl From: K Ostman jmailto:ostman44Ca)msn.coml Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 7:31 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edinborough Park Edina ciy council members, I am a homeowner in the Countryside area and I also own a condo at Edinborough where a family member resides. As an Edina resident, I understand that you need to be good stewards of our tax money and at the same time not discriminate against age'groups. Most of our parks cater to youngsters and youth groups. Thislis one park that can be enjoyed by all age groups. When my children were toddlers, I could bring them to play at this park with no fee. Now -it seems that those with less money cannot benefit from the parks that their tax dollars support. As an Edinborough homeowner, I have paid towards park maintenance every month. It is an amenity for the condos. Without this amenity, the value of our condos will further go down and so also the taxes based on a home's value. The indoor park is an asset to Edina. A warehouse could be converted to a children's play area if there is a need for such an area. The pool and fitness area is an asset enjoyed by some of the older members of the community. Do the elderly living in the adjoining highrise need to be subject to more noise. Keep the park as a quiet retreat and buid a children's play area in a stand alone building. Karen Ostman 5917 Olinger Road Edina,MN 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf. of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 9:43 AM To: Susan Faus Cc: Susan'Howl; Ann Kattreh, John Keprios Subject: FW: Edinborough Park Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Susan Faus, Ann Kattreh and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist a 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(ccDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living,,. Raising Families & Doing Bmsiness w Please make note of my_ new email address. we're a do town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy cho cep _ .. ... . From: Gale Moesler [mailto:glm55021Cayahoo.coml Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:27 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edinborough Park Please, please do not take our swimming pool and track away! It was,one,of the reasons we decided to,live at Edinborough Village in Edina! This benefit bring people to this area! For many, this is the'only way they are able to get the,excercise needed! Please reconsider and do the right thing for the people who live in this area: Thank you, Gale.L. Moesler 7625 Edinborough Way #2220 Edina,. MN 55435 1 June 10, 2012 Dear Edina Council Members: I am writing to express my concerns over what I have heard of proposals being made to increase revenues at Edinborough Park. I am aware that I do not have all of the information that you have, but I want you to know that I am unhappy to hear that recommendations are being considered to close the swimming pool, to close the track and fitness area, and to remove two- thirds of the park's foliage. I have lived here at the Village Homes of Edinborough for about fifteen years now. I have utilized the pool, the track and fitness area, and have enjoyed the greenery (especially during our long winter months). Before the large slide and playground was installed I would enjoy walking around the upper level. I would often see seniors from the high -rise walking there as well. It was a peaceful, quiet, and beautiful place. I have had no problem funding the maintenance of the Park because I knew I had access to the facilities. I am aware that this past year the residents of the Village Homes have paid the city of Edina $70,000 toward the maintenance of the park. I do not know what the plan is for funding if the "park" is turned into a "playground," but I would find it an injustice to be expected to continue with this support. I have a few questions: 1. What was the original vision thirty years ago when the city decided to build a park connected to a senior high -rise and within a condominium community? 2. What is in the contract between the city and the condominium association, what is the length of the contract and what happens when the contract expires? 3. What responsibility does the city have to the association and what responsibility do the residents of the condo association have to the city with regard to the Park? 4. What say do the residents have in the decision - making process to make such major changes to the functions and structures of the Park? So to be clear, based on the information that I now have, I am opposed to the removal of the pool, exercise area, and the foliage to create amore kid - friendly environment. Sincerely, Mary Clough 7621 Edinborough Way #2103 Edina, MN 55435 952 - 831 -7547 Susan Howl Subject: Magnificent Edinborough Park Dear Council Members, We are writing to you again to express our enormous concern regarding the proposed plan to destroy our beloved Edinborough Park. Further to the detailed letter we sent you last April (attached herewith for your convenience) we would like to state the following: 1. When we purchased our unit at Edinborough 20 years ago, the key factor in our decision was the appeal of Edinborough Park with its unusual beauty and adult and child facilities, particularly the pool and the jogging track. Our understanding was, and continues to be, that this is a contractual arrangement. Furthermore, the purchase value of our unit included the asset of the proximity of the Park and its facilities, particularly in winter time. 2. Removing the Park and its facilities for the senior residents of the Edinborough community, while expanding them for children's activities, is not only a serious deprivation to our health and well -being activities, it is plain discriminatory. 3. We understand that there is a conflict of interest involved that is potentially impacting the decision making process, specifically, in relation to aiming to increase the membership of the Edina YMCA. This is regrettable and should be unacceptable to the behavior and reputation of the city of Edina! We hope that fair, equitable and far - sighted decisions by the City of Edina will prevail. Sincerely, Riva and Mary Bartell 7602 York Avenue South #7218 Edina, MN 55435 E -Mail: rbartell @shaw.ca attachment April, 21, 2012 _ ---------- Council Members of the City of Edina Re: Edinborough Park Dear Council Members, We are writing to you to express our deep concerns, and that of our neighbors and friends here in the Edinborough Condominium Community, regarding the consultant's recommendation to the City of Edina. We request that you maintain the integrity of the Edinborough Park in its present organic wholeness, serving adults and children alike. We are veteran residents of Edinborough Condominium Community, since October 1992. We are shocked and distressed by the reported consultant's recommendation to the City of Edina. • in purchasing our unit, we, like many other residents here, took very much into consideration the access and accessibility to the Edinborough Park, and in particular, the pool and track and the tropical plants' environment, as an integral part of our Edinborough life style and living experience, and as a contractual partnership between Laukka Property Development and the City of Edina. • We view the consultant's recommendation as a terrible blow to our sense of belonging in the Edinborough Community, an undermining of the quality of life here and as a serious threat resulting in the likely devaluation of our property. • We understand that among the various financial reasons stated in the consultant's recommendation there is a conflict of interest involved with the YMCA regarding competing memberships and loyalties. This is regrettable and should be viewed as unacceptable. • To remove the facilities of the pool and track, as well as the tropical plants, with their calming, cleansing, (producing oxygen) and healing effects, is an unacceptable deprivation of services to the adult membership of our community, that is also the majority of our community. • The City of Edina is admired for its progressive practices and its investment in parks and care of the environment and its residents. We refuse to believe that you would even consider taking actions, affecting the adult residents of Edinborough Condominium Community, that are contrary to your fine reputation and your past record. Such actions are viewed as age discrimination, particularly, considering the reliance of the elderly and weak amongst our members on the facilities of Edinborough Park for their health and wellbeing. 1 •. The longstanding Edinborough Park is a unique gem, worthy of recognition beyond Edina and Minneapolis, beautifully serving children and their families, and adults - young and old together and creating a vibrant environment of a wholesome life cycle community, and continues to be a most valuable attraction for potential new property owners. in our community of Edinborough Condominium Association. Please keep it this way!! ! Sincerely, Riva and Marvin Bartell 7602 York Avenue South, #7218 Phone: 952 - 835 -3437 Email: rbartell @sha`w.ca 2 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:28 PM To: Susan Faus Cc: Susan Howl; Ann Kattreh; John Keprios Subject: FW: Edinborough Park Exercise Area Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Susan Faus, Ann Kattreh and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno (a- EdinaMN..qovIwww. Edina MN.gov '•. „,s.: = ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town working to make the healthy choice the easy choices From: elainehewitt3 @g.com [mailto:elainehewitt3 @q.coml Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:24 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edinborough Park Exercise Area The Edinborough Park and Exercise Area is very important to us and was one of the factors we chose to buy a condo at Edinborough. When our health permitted, we were using the exercise area almost on a daily basis. We use it now as often as health permits, and we also go to the indoor park very frequently. It is a great stress reliever. Both areas are very important to us and we would appreciate it if you would not make changes. We think we seniors deserve to have this exercise area and also the park area. There is already a lot of space devoted to the childrens' play area and we do not think that should be increased. We do not think one age group should be targeted; we think it is better to target multiple age groups as is being done now. Thank you for your consideration, David and R. Elaine Hewitt 7606 York Ave. S. Unit 7101 VILLAGE HOMES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. 3300 Edinborough Way #2U2 Edina, MN 55435 Telephone: 952 - 831 -8325 Fax: 952-253-3352 Website: www.laukka.com Email: mrk@laukka.com laukka.com June 11, 2012 Edina City Council, Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council, We, the Board of Directors of the Centennial Lakes Condominium Association, are asking you to keep the pool & track open at Edinborough Park for the following reasons. Swimming and/or water exercise has these health benefits: • promotes flexibility, joint mobility and coordination • increases muscular endurance, strength and aerobic capacity • often recommended by physicians for rehabilitation after illnesses and /or injuries • may be the only exercise possible for seniors and /or "baby boomers" who have health concerns • can be a lifelong aerobic activity • helps build friendships, connections with neighbors & a sense of community • encourages visits to Edinborough Park, a multi - generational facility • enables healthy people to create healthy communities There are also financial considerations for maintaining access to this neighborhood pool: • for the past 22 years our 250 unit complex has paid $45,000 annually for park fees • this amenity enhances the property values of our association homeowners as well as that of our neighbors in the Edinborough condos, Coventry townhomes, Edina Park Plaza and Residence Inn who also pay yearly park fees. We certainly empathize with your difficult task of making ethical decisions regarding this and other challenging concerns. We alert you to this matter because we believe continuing access to this pool is very important to the well -being of our neighborhood. Thank you for all of hard work on behalf of the city of Edina and for your attention to this request. Sincerely, Board of Directors Village Homes of Centennial Lakes Condominium Association Susan Howl - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 3:43 PM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan Howl. Subject: FW: Housing Proposal at Southdale FYI Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications& Technology Services Director 952 - 833 -9520 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 JBennerotte @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families& Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PMG [ma i Ito: pmg SisyphusCafe.coml Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:38 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Housing Proposal at Southdale Dear Jennifer, I just read the 6.5.12.Council Connection. Will you please pass on to the City Council members that if the Southdale Center housing project moves forward, I strongly encourage them have the developer include affordable housing units in the project. The location, within walking distance to public transportation, grocery stores, medical facilities, and many other amenities, makes this an ideal place for people of low income. Much thanks, Paulette Hastings 952.564:8388 4420 Dunham Drive, Edina �d a Otte RE PORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IX. B. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: June 19, 2012 Subject: Receive Petition Requesting Sidewalk RECOMMENDATION: Motion accepting the petition and referring it to Engineering for study. INFO /BACKGROUND: On June 8, 2012, a petition was received requesting sidewalk and crosswalks on south side of Interlachen Boulevard, from 50th and Vernon to Mirror Lakes Drive including one block of existing sidewalk at Bedford Avenue to William Avenue. The request also asked for crosswalks to the north side of the Interlachen neighborhoods. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. ATTACHMENT: Petition v.. FA SEAL JUN -' 2012 BATE RECEIVED: ���� City of Edina, Minnesota RE VED r o @ N CITY COUNCIL �� fir` )0 4801 West 50"' Street •Edina, Minnesota 55424 `'•- ,� � (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD-- -- ---. PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL V c°nhec wig nn irror La,i<eS Drivf� inUudf� l b /dG(LOF a'xr fi 5(`G� Q 5.0" Ver % E t A-ue 'b uh7((dn SIDEWALK �So�,� -� y, 5rcf-� of ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN 1we ❑ STORM SEWER -inI&Iathem ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: ('Xn S'S w car( ICS SURFACING WITH t2 No ri-A ! i, k df kr CURB AND GUTTER i a-lcr_ X;E To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. &LV P la G `W-%j between L/��l (L L7 and M l /YOYfS LOCATION OF 1WROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS � ADDRESS < N a.: ken 3 L VD between_ --rae- �R C, 0 Clyd -e and �{P�It 61WW7 LOCATION OFMMOVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS -rN Ala -C!Z a /3L YD between ri74 -Prl q dtap 13 and Zf174° /lR LOCATION OF EffROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS l _ ADDRESS W /,a( ham between 11,If-erQ l�Pn 3/ Ut pand J' / h n-e- yt LOCATION OF um[pROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS sx 4 line a. n d 0 X f rrrcP. v9,%e U X d a.n °l 3e dL f b(`d �`F w I l i o� w. ►q v-e . c� -,.�cQ f-�c� v� K erSm�► v�ue. IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS • DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTE PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE was clrcul 'e lJ Lt�fj NAME OWNER'S NAME (PRESTED) by PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTEV7 Cvao �SOiI .(� (2(% � ..Zh�•�/ i%l1 �i! /'G /f w/ `� �� / Goo U� (Oy ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNAL S 1�5u�1 2 , 2Y1 OWNER'S NAZ (PRINTED) //L-L -s s 5 C, Luc (41445e^, 3/ , 14ALA2G ��- ►,���� 4'e AoilUN Y 0 '�� /i ►acs �� G1 S v i� Ire This petition was circulated by: L, at? 6 Gcd z,-u odso-h �LRo l refer ADDRESS s NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINT ED) ( /� (✓ D°( L,.i�f'ccclnen 1� MAf Sao /o ��►'ICCV�Bn �✓� E �� �n� 1 DIY de, � 9� � o P D t� czfzJZ rtsY$R��tcHSN B(„� -;?") O ;2- ?06 0S`6 S PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data This petition PIY submitted his informationecome public information. There is no consequent f fus g You may attach extra pages with signatures. '1 � APRIL. PROPERTY OVVNEIVS OW I SI (PRINTED) Js, [. �,� ►I . PJ YL , aw Ana n This petition was circulated by: PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 2,G 6 IN Ir L P r. DIAL J D •.�C,.li� o4?, 6r !t la c ham! CA-c f- NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 18, 2012 12:50 A.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the meeting to order at 12:50 a.m., April 18, 2012. ROLLCALL Answering rollca.11 were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. MINUTES OFTHE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 20, 2012, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Minutes of the Regular; Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for March 20, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD: CONSIDERING MODIFICATIONS TO SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING SOUTHDALE 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, CONSIDERING APPROVAL OF SOUTHDALE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BUSINESS SUBSIDY AND PROPOSED SPENDING PLAN FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES TIF FINANCING DISTRICT, AND CONSIDERING REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — RESOLUTION NO. 2012- 4, RESOLUTION NO. 2012-6, AND RESOLUTION NO. 2012-7 ADOPTED Chair Hovland opened the public hearing for the consideration of modifications to Southeast Edina Development District and Establishing Southdale2 Tax Increment District, considering approval of Southdale Limited Partnership Business Subsidy and proposed spending plan for Centennial Lakes TIF Financing District and authorizing the Chair and Executive Director to sign all agreements. No one appeared to speak. Motion of Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Bennett to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion; carried. Commissioner Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -4, adopting a modification to the redevelopment plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area; and establishing the Southdale, 2 Tax Increment Financing District therein and adopting`a Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore; Resolution No. 2012 -6, approving a spending plan for the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment District;- and, Resolution No. 2012 -7, authorizing an interfund loan for advance of certain costs in connection with the Southdale 2 Tax Increment_ Financing District, and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute a redevelopment agreement. Commissioner Brindle seconded the motion. Commissioner Bennett acknowledged the importance of Southdale Center and community concern about what would happen with Southdale. She indicated she appreciated how hard people had worked on this agreement; however, her responsibility was to Edina's taxpayers. Commissioner Bennett reviewed other potential projects for tax increment, noted the transit station was of a temporal nature, and indicated she would not support the motion to adopt. The HRA indicated it would be remiss to not address the decline of Southdale Center, the major concern expressed in the resident survey. It was noted the proposed agreement was beneficial to both sides, allowed 1 Minutes /Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority /April 17, 2012 the City to catalyze private equity of Simon Properties, created direct benefits of employment, long -term improvement to attract tenants /increase occupancy, thus increasing property values that would increase tax revenue and benefit citizens. The HRA found Simon Properties' financial means and proven record of accomplishment would mitigate the City's risk. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:58 a.m. April 18, 2012 Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director /1 NA o�e� 1888 AGENDA ITEM HRA 111. Amendment No. 1 To Southdale Redevelopment Agreement (Refer to Item Vlll. 8.) No packet data [--] Oral presentation Information coming MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 8, 2012 7:00 PM I CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:07 pm II. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Members Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto, Weicht, Neville . III. APPROVAL OFMEETINGAGENDA Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member. Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes,— Regular Meeting of Tuesday, April 10, 2012 Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried V COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VIA. Naming of Parks and Facilities Working Group Recommendations Member Jones went over the "Summary Document" that the working group put together and thanked the Working Group: Member Hulbert, Andy Otness, Bob Kojetin, Ray Giske, David Mesenbourg, Tom Gyump and Rick Ites for their many, many hours of service. She informed the Park-Board that the working group reviewed both naming and donation policies throughout the United States and went through the many different intricacies of their situations that might apply to Edina and reworked them. She indicated that as of the last Friday they received some more comments from the public that she has noted in the blue markup. Member Jones indicated that there currently is no formal naming policy in the City of Edina and pointed out that the City Council approved the Naming and Donation Working Group after hearing several concerns from residents about the current practice. She added that naming and dedication requests come up several times a year to which staff is currently aware of four naming proposals. Member Jones stated that after going through the current practice and concerns the working group recommends that the City develop a single naming and dedication policy for all City facilities. She noted they are not recommending that the City rename current facilities to meet specifications in this policy. She pointed out the working group recommends that the Park Board approve the "Naming Dedication Policy" as well as they recommend that the City develop an "Application for Naming and Dedicating Facilities" and ,a "Petition to the City of Edina" as shown in concept in the Appendix of the policy. Andy Otness gave the Park Board a summary of the Naming Policy and stated that the City Council has the sole authority for establishing formal names and dedicating any city facilities. She pointed out that facilities..are described as anything the City controls: parks, buildings, major features, streets and amenities. She noted the second thing the policy states is that the.City Manager's Office will have sole responsibility for keeping a record and managing the naming and dedication process. Ms. Otness indicated that they also felt what the policy did was set out principles for naming and renaming and,dedications and that naming would be reserved for exceptional circumstances. She noted that: in their original meetings they had a whole gamut of people who felt things should be restricted or completely open and so that part of the policy represents a collaborative decision. Ms. Otness informed the Park Board that a lot of the discussions revolved'around the naming and renaming for exceptional individuals and the working group decided within the policy that the naming should be based on the contributions to the City rather than the circumstances of their death. Secondly, it -was decidedthere should be a time period after that person has died or ended their relationship with ;the. City, to reflect upon an individual's legacy beforethat naming process would begin. The name of an individual will be considered for a park only if that person has been deceased for 100 years and influenced Edina's history or has naming for him/her as a conditio&made by the donor of actual land for the park. Ms. Otness pointed out there is another category of naming besides parks and that is that an individual. be considered for a building, major feature or street if that person either was or is currently a resident 1 Edina; has'made a significant contribution over a period of several years to the general public interest - and has ended his or her substantive formal relationship with the'City mhas passed away five years prior. to the initiation of a naming process or the name could be considered if it was requested as a restriction of a significant extraordinary major gift to the city like the donation -of land•: - -... ,. Ms. Otness pointed out with regards to naming for entities no City facility, except a -major feature, shall be named for a business entity as a condition for a donation to the City. This is to minimize the confusion and cost to the City for updating signage and maps. Name of.busiiiess entities shall be for a fi xed period. Names of business entities operating on City property shall be subject to City Council approval and will not require a petition, process. Ms.- Otn'e— informed the Park Board that lastly public support for name requests should be demonstrated with a petition process. The working group recommends that the naming and renaming requests require 300 signatures and any dedication requires 100 signatures. In addition, the public and specifically the facilities neighborhood will be informed of a naming request and an opportunity will be provided for their input and comment. Member Jones thanked Mr. Kojetin for all of his work on compiling the names and donations of all the parks. Mr. Kojetin gave the Park Board a brief history on the compilation report he created. He noted that'he thought it would be good to have one central location where a record is kept with the history of the parks and donations where people can go to find this type of information. He noted that he will continue to work on the book as long as he can because there is still a lot more to be added. He noted that most of this information will be stored at the Edina Historical Museum. Member Segreto indicated that on top of page two of the "Naming and Dedication Policy" where they talk about the philosophy of the City and give an order of preference for naming she feels that each of those-categories is really important and is not sure why there needs to be a preference. Member Jones replied they wanted to make sure the order of preference represented something that would first honor maybe a natural place and that's where the geographic location thought connected to it and kind of wanted to make sure they didn't lose sight of the geographic nature of the community before they went on to more of a people nature of their history which happens to be the events and the people that affect the history. Member Segreto commented that she was very moved by Mr. Kojetin's report and seeing the names of people who have been very important to this community that she would be hard pressed to see that if they were to order preference they would be listed third and therefore would hate to see an order of preference within policy. Member Hulbert replied they came up with what they felt was a kind of a logical order of significance but that isn't to say that geographic location necessarily has to be number one. Member Segreto indicated that a facility named for an individual who had something happen to their reputation, should have the name changed according to the new guidelines. She stated that puts them into a position of when exactly it should be changed and should that person have the right to clear his or her name in court or in the community. She noted that maybe it would be sufficient to say "The City Council reserves the right'to change the name in the event the individual has fallen into disrepute ". Member Segreto commented that most of her comments are goingto be geared to giving the City Council the discretion and looking to the guidelines to sway them in a direction rather.than requiring a name change. Ms. Otness informed the Park Board that she recalls this discussion came up right after the Joe Paterno events in Ohio. She stated that she is not a "legal person" but knows there is a difference between saying "reserves the right" or "shall" or "may ". Therefore, they decided to craft this as they felt at that time and that it would be reviewed by the City attorney for the legal distinction. Chair Steel suggested the Park Board discuss each page. Page Three - Member Segreto asked the working group on the top of the page where it states "to be considered historic a person should be deceased for at least 100 years" how they came up with that number because 100 years seems really; really- long to her. Member Hulbert responded they viewed naming parks and land a huge honor and so to have a park renamed for you they wanted there to be some time to reflect, although 100 years might be a little long. Member Deeds commented that he would go with something like 25 years to reflect a little bit. Member Jones indicated that what it came to actually was what makes something historic is it 100 years, 50 years or 25 years. Member Segreto responded that actually it's not duration that makes it historic, it's what they do and the impact it makes that make it historic. Member Hulbert suggested going with 25 years to which Member Kathryn Peterson replied 25 years is more reasonable. Ms. Otness noted impart was that it would be a legacy that had lasted and maybe that's the language "that will last" because how do you define legacy. Chair Hulbert noted it seems to be a general consensus 25 years is a good number. Member Segreto commented that.she sees "100 years in the next paragraph "No park shall be, named or renamed for an individual unless'that individual, was a resident of Edina, has been deceased for at least 100 years .. " and so her comment would be the same. Member Segreto indicated in the next paragraph where it reads "The naming and renaming of a building, major feature, or street shall occur no sooner than five years after that person has ended his or her substantive, formal relationship with- the-City five years may be too; long and she would like to see it cut to three years. She noted that after someone retires or leaves the City there could be some circumstances especially if someone has a health problem. Member Hulbert responded there were some people that felt pretty strongly that it should be until the person was actually deceased but they did all agree there should be some kind of cooling off period. Chair'Steel asked how this compares to other cities that were researched to which Member Jones responded in most cities the person needs to be dead. Member Hulbert added that Edina is pretty rare in that they names facilities and buildings after people who are still alive. Member Jones commented that when they first crafted the policy it did say you needed to have been deceased before anything could be named after you and kept it for months. However, when they reviewed the policy they decided to change it in light of the way Edina deals with their parks which is different than the way other cities do. Member Hulbert commented that he thinks sometimes there is a rush to immediately honor and bestow those people with honors right away. However, in reality we know that three or five years go by quickly and if that award is really merited it will still be there three to five years down the road which gives them a little time to reflect and make sure things are what they thought they were. Page Four — No changes made Page Five Member Segreto asked in regards to the 300 signatures that would be required to start a petition is that what the research bore out in terms of other municipalities? Member Jones replied she believes it is similar to what Denver's policy is. She explained the reason for it is to find out what the level of support and commitment are for the name and they settled on 300 signatures. Member Segreto asked would that mean then if a City Council member wanted to initiate a name change or name something they would have to get 300 signatures. Member Jones replied yes, unless they wanted to go against policy to which that would be noted. Mr. Keprios commented that it's very difficult trying to put a comprehensive policy together because you it will likely be changed in the future but at least it will help by serving as a guideline for the City Council. Member Deeds noted that to him it seems reasonable to need to have 300 signatures because there does need to be a certain level of interest and support and this puts a barrier up there to make people work a little bit more. Page Six — No changes made. Member Jones informed the Park Board that the "application" is just a concept draft and they are not dictating to the City how to write their procedures for internal processing. She noted that she did send it to the City Manager and Assistant City Manager asking for their comments. Page One — Went back to page one since it was skipped. Chair Steel thanked everyone for their hard work. Member Deeds commented that under the major gifts, page 4, if they look at the Hornet's Nest proposal is that going to be named the "Hornet's Nest" or are the people who are involved going to be recognized since they are essentially paying one - quarter of the capital costs which is a one million dollar donation. He noted his concern is the policies in this area may be so tight that they eliminate a chunk of flexibility that will allow the City to pursue major gifts. He stated there is a pretty stiff requirement in the policy, (page 4 second #1) stating "Payment of the capital costs for constructing or installing a major feature ". To him under # 1 it implies 100% of the capital costs. Member Jones responded they should define "major feature" because you are comparing it to a building and there are two definitions in that section. She noted that the paragraph Member Deeds read is the guideline for major features which would include ball fields, swimming pools, playgrounds, etc. Member Deeds pointed out in regards to the Sports Dome they are seeking a gift for the Sports Dome and naming rights for the Sports Dome. He noted it's a three million dollar undertaking so this would imply they would have to raise 1.5 million dollars in order to give the naming rights away and that is his concern. Chair Steel asked Member Jones if she thinks it would be considered a City facility which would be covered under the previous paragraph. Member Jones replied that she would consider the Sports Dome to be a building. Member Deeds stated for example you have two million dollars' worth of renovations at the ball field and if they were able to get a sponsor who wanted to put in a million dollars, would we give them the name of the ball field. He indicated that yes, he would think he would give them the name of a ball field for one million dollars even if it's not covering the full two million dollars. That is his only concern 4 with the current wording because it's a pretty tight policy. He suggested changing it to say "a substantial portion" or something like that. Member Jones replied you could change all of #I under that paragraph to "Payment of a substantial capital cost for constructing and installing ". Chair Steel commented that it also helps that it does say "likewise as a guideline but not a limitation ". Member Deeds indicated that he just wants to give it as much flexibility as possible. Member Hulbert added that he thinks when it comes to larger items like the "Hornet's Nest' ' City Council is going to do what they see fit. Member Dan Peterson indicated that he has thought all along that the naming proposition was a solution in search of a problem and he continues to believe that. He noted that he wants to thank everyone who served on the working group and that he holds the Park Board members most dearly; however, he is going to vote "no" because there is no proof to him that the current system is broken and needs t6 be fixed. He stated that he has nothing but the highest respect for people who run for public office and the five people who serve on the City Council, current, past and future, are pretty good people and he-- -. doesn't want to tie their hands to a policy which has some problems. He commented that he thinks they've done a good job and'he doesn't get too concerned in a city of almost 50,000 and only a few people don't like the name of a certain park or pavilion. He noted there is always going to be disagreement and they get past it and move along. Member Hulbert stated that he agrees, they do have excellent City Council members past and present but situations have occurred in the past that with a lack of policy it would have helped both members of the public and'staffas well. Member Deeds responded that he agrees and actually thinks they are doing the City. Council a favor, they will still have the decision whether they are going to adopt it or not, but it's a policy and a guideline that they can vote to override anytime they want to. He commented that they are essentially giving City Council the shot to say well, wait a minute we have a policy here, let's think about this and provide some level of rationality and a little more consistency to the process. He stated that he thinks the working group has done a great job on this. Member Deeds suggested that the information from Mr. Kojetin's booklet be put on the City's website in a searchable form because it would be a great service and so people who are searching for relatives or something will be able to find it. Mr. Keprios replied that's an excellent suggestion and would be a great project for the Historical Society to work on with the Communications Department. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, that where it states 100 years on page 3 that it be replaced with 25 years. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, that on page two in the paragraph headed "Renaming City Facilities" that the second paragraph be deleted and that the third paragraph be amended to read "notwithstanding the above, the City Council reserves the right to change the name <of any named city facility in order to maintain consistency.with the °entire policy and flexibili ty to change the name of a facility named after an individual who has fallen into disrepute. and whose name no longer lends honor and dignity to the facility" Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, that they amend on page four the second #1 to read "Payment of substantial capital costs for constructing and installing a major feature ". Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert to approve the Naming and Dedication of City Facilities as amended. Ayes: Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Nays: Dan Peterson Motion Carried. VI.B. Donations Policy Working Group Recommendations Member Jones gave a quick background on donations and noted that currently Edina has two donation policies; one is from 1995 "Donations, Sponsorships and Advertising Policy" and there is also a "Donations and Memorial Policy" that was adopted in the year 2000. She indicated that the City does not currently have citywide written standards for accepting donations or procedures for processing and recording donations. She explained that the working group would like to provide a welcoming and efficient system for uniformly and responsibly accepting, recording and acknowledging donations of money, material, goods and services. She stated that the working group is recommending that the City should replace the two existing donation policies with the proposed donation policy dated April 25, 2012. Member Jones explained that the working group recommends that the City should develop a citywide uniform donation application and agreement form as well as create new sponsorship and advertising policies. She indicated that they also recommend that the City develop a donations pamphlet showing benches and other items that the City needs in order to make the process of donating easier and welcoming. In addition, they recommend that the City enhance their volunteer programs to increase resident donations of their time and services towards the improvement to the community. Member Jones also pointed out that they recommend that the City should evaluate and enhance the way it recognizes donors of goods and services. The goal of this would be both to encourage and increase donations to the City and to promote citywide consistency. Member Segreto commented that her biggest concern is that their donation policies not have a "chilling" effect on people who are interested in donating. Member Hulbert replied that currently they don't think the people in the public really understand what the policy is and how they can make donations. Member Jones noted one of the things they are most excited about is having a list of items of what the City would like in the system whether it's gazebos, park benches, etc. Member Segreto responded that she agrees and also agrees that they need guidelines; however, as she goes through the guidelines there are a few areas that create a "chill" that she would like to talk about. Member Segreto pointed out that on page one she would like to see "real estate" included under the definition section of "potential gifts ". Member Jones responded "real estate" is listed on the second page but agrees it would be good to put on page one as well under "Definitions ". Member Deeds indicated on page one he has a concern on the authority because prior policy states that the City Manager could accept anything up to $5,000 and now essentially has to act to accept everything. Mr. Keprios replied that now under State Law the City Council must approve all cash, real estate, goods, etc.; however, they do not have to approve volunteer services. Mr. Keprios explained to the Park Board that the $5,000 was put in there when the policy was created to intentionally start reducing the additional number of plaques in parks and the working group is now recommending that the threshold go up to $10,000 with the exception of benches. Member Segreto indicated that on page two when she read the first paragraph it was a little off - putting in the third line where it states "the City is not here to accommodate gifts ", of course the City is not but she doesn't feel they actually have to say that. She commented that she has the same reaction to some of the language regarding building shrines to donors; it makes her feel uncomfortable and feels "heavy handed ". 6 Chair Steel responded that she thinks that it is a document that will be read by potential donors so she agrees. Member Deeds noted that he also agrees with "All gifts should be in- keeping with the mission, ordinances, philosophy of the policies of the City. The development of public facilities is expected to be the result of careful planning and quality construction ". He noted that he thinks they should take out "Donor recognition should.not compete for attention, nor attract attention, etc." and noted that you don't want to turn a donor off through this. Member Jones asked Member Deeds if he would delete "City facilities are to be enjoyed and used by all citizens and are not to become shrines to donors, memorialized persons or business entities ". Member Deeds,replied he would keep "City facilities are to be enjoyed and used by all citizens ", but he would not do the rest of that. Member Jones asked if he would keep "donor recognition should not compete for attention or attract attention ". Member Deeds replied that he doesn't think they need to call that out. Member Segreto commented that in keeping with the same comment she does agree that donations should ,not be burdensome to the City and she does agree that donors should understand the City's policy for upkeep and retention. She stated ;that' if they have a good donor contract they could incorporate their concerns in that contract and` not have it be in the opening "paragraphs that:donors will need to read before they make their gift. She noted her recommendatiodwould be to - delete in the second paragraph the second and third line and would,also recommend deleting the second paragraph and the third line. Chair Steel asked Member Segreto to read it for Park Board's clarification. Member Segreto stated that she would delete "acceptance procedures should ensure that donations not become burdensome to the City and that donors understand the City's policy for upkeep and retention. For donations of material items, all installation, and recognition costs should be included in the cost of the donation ".. Member Jones asked if that will be somewhere else in the policy: Member Hulbert commented they should at least make sure that it's in the contract. Member Jones added that the reason they have this is really to welcome and establish a policy that will be easier than it currently is that was their full intent in welcoming. She noted that if the words are not welcoming she just wants to make sure that the features that they wanted are in the policy and as she looks at -that she thinks those things are written up in the guidelines. Member Segreto stated that if this is in the contract then when there is a donor, especially a significant donor they could sit down with the City and probably negotiate some of these items and so put it in the contract and then it's there to be discussed rather than in the opening two paragraphs. Member Segreto indicated that on number three page three it says "the donation covers the full costs for purchase, recognition, installation and required maintenance during the expected life span of the feature that ", has a much more positive tone. Chair Steel asked Member Segreto if she would like to make a motion for the lines she would like to see deleted on page two. Member Hulbert asked Member Segreto those are the lines you wanted you stopped at "should be included with the cost of the donation ", what about the next sentence where it says "the city reserves the right to charge maintenance costs ", Member Segreto replied that she would leave the. "city reserves the right to charge maintenance costs ", that's for maintenance'or repair costs. Member Segreto added where it states "The City should not become burdened by pledged gifts that are not obtained" she doesn't think they have to say they were `burdened" but rather should say "pledges should not be considered donations" and leave it at that. Member Hulbert responded that he thinks that was more in line with gifts because he has heard of stories of people just donating items to the City that the City doesn't even need. Member Deeds commented that the line they are referring to is simply talking about people that pledge and then never fulfill that pledge and so he thinks they only have to say "it should not be considered donations ". 7 Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to recommend that on page two in the second paragraph the second line reading "acceptance procedures should ensure that donations not become burdensome to the City and that donors understand the City's policy for upkeep and retention" be deleted. Additionally, the third line in that same paragraph reading "for donations of material items all installation and recognition costs should be included with the cost of donation" should be deleted. In that same paragraph the sentence beginning "the City should not become burdened by pledged gifts that are not obtained and therefore" be deleted and a period inserted. The line will then go on to read "Pledges should not be considered donations ". Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Chair Steel informed Member Segreto she is going to bump her up to the first paragraph if you want to do the same because she had deleted a third line "not to accommodate gifts" and then started with deletion on the fourth line "and are not to become shrines" and deleted the renaming of that paragraph. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to recommend in the first paragraph third line, delete the words "not to accommodate gifts ". In the fourth line of that same paragraph delete "and are not to become shrines to donors, memorialized persons or business entities ". Delete the next sentence "donor recognition should not compete for attention or attract attention away from the purpose for which the facility was created ". Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Chair Steel asked Member Segreto to do a quick motion on the first page about real estate. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to recommend on page one in the definition section that "real estate" be inserted anywhere in the definition of gifts. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Page 2 other items Member Segreto noted that at the bottom of the page # 1 it says "The donation shall meet a true need for the City" and stated that she thinks it's hard to understand what "true need" means so instead say "The donation shall be in the best interest of the City ". Member Hulbert replied that he thinks it accomplishes the same thing. Member Deeds noted that he questions, given that the City Council has to accept all donations anyway and vote on them, do they even need that line in there. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the City Council doesn't have to accept all proposed donations, they can reject whichever ones they choose. Member Deeds responded he means do they need that first line in there. because in that case they are going to review them all anyway, particularly major donations, as to whether they meet the needs of the City. Member Hulbert replied that maybe it will let people know so that it doesn't come as a surprise to them. Member Jones stated that she thinks Member Segreto's wording was friendlier and their intent is to be welcoming. Member Jones pointed out that what they were trying to get at with the wording was what if someone has created something and wants to give it to the City but the City has no place for it and doesn't really want to accept it then the City Council would have a reason to say "no ". Member Segreto commented that she agrees and maybe it should say "the donation shall be in the best interest of the City" and just leave it at that. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to amend on page two the paragraph numbered #1, that the language be deleted and substitute language that reads "the donation shall be in the best interest of the City" inserted in its place. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. 8 Page Three — Member Segreto indicated that she would like to see number three say "The City shall consider the costs of the installation and if required maintenance" rather than "The donation shall cover the full costs ". Member Jones responded that she understands Member Segreto is trying to be a little more lenient but this piece is about what the actual donation should cover. Member Segreto suggested saying "The City shall consider all costs associated with the gift ". Member Jones pointed out that she is talking about when they fill out that donation form what they are talking about is what the total donation should -be and there's a calculation there. Member Segreto commented that is why she thinks they need to be real clear inthe contract that the City will not ensure that a tree will be around in that location in perpetuity and that the City will not be held responsible for replacement. Member Hulbert commented that he sees what Member Segreto is saying but he doesn't read #3 as being really negative but rather thinks it's just being clear in explaining what is expected along with the gift. Chair Steel asked Member Segreto if she would like to make a motion to which Member Segreto replied no. Member Segreto indicated that she would'delete #5, #6 and P. Member Hulbert asked her why she would want to delete them. Member Segreto replied again because to her it's "chilling ". In, #7 where it reads "The, donation does not require the purchase of a burdensome amount of additional items in order for it to be- useful" seems "chilling" they either accept it or not because she has full faith in staff and City Council about whether or not we should accept something we can't take care of.. Chair Steel stated that to her it seems to conflict a little with #3 and therefore maybe they need to beef up #3. Member Deeds noted that because they have #3 he doesn't think they need #5, #6 or #7 to which Member Segreto noted she would be fine with that. Chair Steel asked the Park Board if there were suggestions of anything they should add to #3. Ms. Otness informed the Park Board that when they went to compile this they used all of the suggestions and comments that came to the working group and so they decided as a group to put it in as they received those suggestions or comments and so that is where the language came in, it wasn't intended to be "chilling ". Members Deeds suggested for #3 they could put "... and require repair and maintenance during the expected life" which takes out one of the #5, #6 or #7. Ms. Otness informed the Park Board that when they went to compile this they used all of the suggestions and comments they received and so for some of those they actually put in the language that they received and that is where some of the language came in. It wasn't intended to be "chilling ", they wanted to include what they received. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, to recommend on page three that #3 shall be deleted in its entirety and substituted with the following: "The City shall consider all costs associated with the gift including but not limited to the full cost for the purchase, recognition, installation (if required) repair and maintenance during the expected life span of the feature ". Member Jones commented that she liked it with the exception she would like to switch to "The donation" instead of "City considers ". Member Jones made an amendment to the motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to recommend that instead of beginning the sentence with "The City shall consider to "The donation should cover" and then follow it with what Member Segreto said. Ayes to Amendment: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Ayes to Motion: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. F Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, recommending striking #5, Wand #7 on page three. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel;:Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to strike #15. Member Jones asked she is just curious as to why you don't want # 15 in there. Member Deeds replied the wording in terms of "creating a shrine" that if they are going to do that he likes the wording from the paragraph they took out which said "donor recognition should.not interfere with the use, etc." . He stated that if the Park Board thinks that is covered by #9 then they do not need to worry about it, they just have it in the one. Member Jones commented that this is actually "the, public should refrain,from creating a shrine" it doesn't have to do, with_ a donation.. as it does with having people deposit flowers or other things, at a City amenity. Member Deeds commented that is appropriate then for guidelines for donations, if that's a whole different issue: It is not partof +the guidelines for a donation. Member Kathryn nPeterson commented that it's not. really in their control. anyway. Ayes:, Pan Petersop,Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds,. Segreto Motion'Carri'ed. Member Deeds indicated on # 17 he thinks it's difficult to name things you don't want to have happen and thinks if it were'a general statement such. as "donations and sponsorships will be gratefully accepted as long as they do not challenge the public sense of common decency and good taste ". He commented that they need to support their local businesses and it's very difficult to say these things aren't good because there could be other things that could'come up so just stick with common decency and good taste. Chair Steel asked if #17 is redundant with #1 that says "The donation should be in the best interest of the City" to;:whichMember Deeds replied he also thinks that covers it. Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to delete #17. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Member Segreto indicated that #8 states "The donation does not present a real or perceived conflict of interesffor the City or its employees" and she is okay with "conflict of interest" but she is not so sure about "perceive ". Member Jones replied that was actually a request by Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager, and is not,sure why she wanted to insert "real" or "perceived" but has a feeling it's because it gives the City-the opportunity to decline a donation. Page Four - Chair Steel asked how you define "large scale" donation. Member Jones replied they didn't define it and that is one of those areas that as you write the policy you try to give some flexibility to the City Council and boards. She commented if you think it needs to be defined she would be. open to discuss and define it. She added that originally they did not have "large scale" in the policy and it seemed as if they were creating record keeping and all sorts of unnecessary bureaucracy. Page Five - Member Deeds indicated he is curious about the blue section because it would seem to him that naming ball fields after people is kind of traditional. Actually, in a lot of cities for somebody who has been instrumental in one of the leagues or something for years and who has put in a lot of energy and effort in a field is named after them. Member Jones responded that came up because people had mentioned that they felt that walking through a park should not feel like walking through a cemetery and they were 10 concerned about memorial plaques being in places where they don't expect to have people think about somebody's loss and so that's why that was included in here. Member Segreto commented that she sort of agrees with Member Deeds that it seems logical that our athletic facilities would 'naturally follow the names of people who have been very successful in a sport., Member Hulbert noted that there is concern about how memorials are displayed. Member Deeds stated that they have City personnel who are responsible for approving the installation of donations and memorials. Member Hulbert commented that the concern is more the construction and placement of memorials more so than naming of fields. Member Jones commented that she does understand that's what most people do when people donate frequently and it's because someone has passed away. She noted that she would like to hear more discussion on it because as she stated earlier everything written in "blue" just came in last:week and has not been discussed as a working group. She.,indicated that she didn't want to disregard, someone who _ has taken the time to comment on the- pol icy Chair Steel asked Member Jones so donations could be made for living people in these areas to which she replied correct: Chair Steel asked what would be the difference in appearance between the donations versus the memorials., Member Jones explained there would possibly be this is "in memory of'. Chair Steel noted it would be the text, correct but you would still see a plaque walking by, right, in either case at first glance when you are walking through the park. Member Jacobson commented that she personally doesn't think they need that statement at all. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Jones, strike the statement in blue under "Installation" that begins with "potential sites for donations. . ." on page five. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Page Six — Mr. Keprios noted that one of the things he would like the Park Board to consider in looking at the adoption of this policy is how many-plaques are enough fora park and is it possible to have too many plaques and at what point does it interfere with the real purpose of the park. He pointed out that the proposed language permits memorial plaques on all park benches. He commented that as the Park Board is coming up with a policy to recommend to the City Council, he asked the Park Board to think about the park experience; what is a park and how and what do you want a visitor of a park to feel during their experience in the park. Member Hulbert responded that he thinks they would all agree that there can be too many. Member Hulbert indicated that the working group mants to have uniformity" of sizing of plaques and the way the benches look so there is symmetry throughout the park.system. 'He noted that he thinks they agreed they didn't feel,it'was necessary to put a plaque, on a tree that someone „donated.. He noted the simple acknowledgment of a donated tree could maybe put on an online registry for certain things. like trees and try to keep the park experience about enjoying -the park-and not always about being a shrine or a memorial. He added that as the community ages there are going to be more requests every day. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that often times when a donation is offered, the plaque is clearly more important to the donor than the proposed new park amenity. Do we really .want every park bench in the entire park system to have a plaque on it that states "In Memory Of'? Mr. Keprios noted that he is curious how the working group decided that it is okay to have those plaques on all benches but no other similar amenities of equal value such as picnic tables or water fountains. Ms. Otness replied she didn't think their discussion was as detailed as that. She indicated that they were thinking most people who would like to donate an amenity to the park are mostly interested in donating benches and they were 11 not necessarily aware of requests for anything else. Mr. Keprios responded that the way he reads it is if you donate a bench you get a plaque but anything other than that has to be $10,000 or greater. Member Jones pointed out they currently have many plaques less than $5,000 as compilation boards and so the difference is that yes, you can be recognized on a board with other donors and that is consistent with what is part of the current policy. Mr. Keprios asked Member Jones to explain what that means. Member Jones explained that there is a recognition board at the Edina Senior Center as well as there are other types of recognition boards throughout the Parks System where people's names are listed. For example, Fox Meadow Park listed the donors of that park. She noted that currently they have this as a policy and noted that in the beginning they recommended that the City come up with consistency and a policy for recognition and really didn't want to get into too many details in the policy. She stated that she does think they could as a City look at the policy of recognizing the donors in a more consistent fashion and they don't want their parks totally filled up with signs. Member Hulbert suggested saying something like "donation of recognition items follow the following criteria" and then come up with a definition sometime at a later date as to what a recognition item is with the help of staff. He asked as a Park Board do they want it to include water fountains, park benches, gazebos, etc. Chair Steel commented that it looks like the last line of page six states "Recognition for tree donations shall be at the discretion of the Director of Parks ... ". Member Deeds stated that he doesn't think at this level they can establish that level of detail in a policy unless they want to go through and say how many plaques will be at each park. He noted on page five under "Installation" it states "City personnel shall be responsible for approving the installation of donations" which means you have the right or somebody in your office has the right to say you know you may want it in that park but we have 47 plaques in that park right now and so we are not going to install it there. Mr. Keprios replied that he would not want this director or the next director to be burdened with this discretion because it opens the door to a perception of favoritism where we simply have to be fair and consistent. Member Deeds asked do they do a certain number of plaques per acre because they have a lot of different parks with a lot of different sizes and with a blanket - policy given the diversity of what they are talking about doesn't make sense. Mr. Keprios explained the main reason he established the existing policy in the first place is because he felt there were too many plaques in the parks and so he made it simple. A donor needed to cross that $5,000 threshold and the current policy accomplished that. For $5,000 you could get a bench but there are not too many people willing to give $5,000 for a bench that only costs $400.00; however, for many people if they can't have a plaque they won't donate. Chair Steel asked Mr. Keprios if he would recommend that they make a statement on preserving the integrity of the park or get rid of the bench section or both. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks the policy that has been in place with the $5,000 threshold works, the intent was to limit more and more plaques. Member Jacobson indicated that on page three #9 it says "the donation shall not interfere with the intended current or future use of the facility" but rather say "the donation should not interfere or detract from... " that really is supporting what you want with the word "detract ". Mr. Keprios replied again that it should not be at the discretion of the Parks Director, it should be consistent. Member Jones stated there are a couple of issues being raised. First is the concern over plaques on park benches and noted that there are some parks that allow plaques on benches but not on the part that you see as you approach the bench but rather on the backside. She noted that could be a policy because she thinks park benches are going to be something that we really want to encourage and welcome donations as the City approves its "Living Streets Policy ". As the "Living Streets Policy" gets funded the City will be looking for additional park benches. Member Hulbert suggested changing it from "The City may recognize donors who have donated $10,000" to "The City may recognize donors who have donated $5,000 ". Member Jones pointed out 12 that goes in the opposite direction of the point you were making. Mr. Keprios stated that the $5,000 threshold works because they still get donations. Member Hulbert indicated that if you drop it down to $5,000 and take in the following paragraph that says "donations and benches shall be recognized according to the final criteria ..." Member Deeds suggested taking "park bench" out and keep the $5,000 in. He noted they need to make an initiative separately and suggested they put out a map where all -of the benches are that the City would like to have and put them up for bid starting at $400. He commented that he doesn't mind every bench being named they can start an auction for the benches in terms of where they are located and how many they want. He noted they could start a "sponsor a bench" or "buy a bench" program and raise money and put it on the City's website talking about the program and leave it open for auction and see what they get. Mr. Keprios asked Member Deeds if he is suggesting they get a plaque on the bench -to which Member Deeds replied he doesn't see any problem with having plaques on every bench in the City if it gets sponsored. He commented that in terms of having plaques on the ground and other places yes, he thinks you are right that is much more problematic and that is where the $5,000 kind of hurdle comes in. Chair Steel noted that she likes Member Deeds approach but wouldn't this policy prohibit a bidding program like that if it didn't get to the $5,000 mark. Member Deeds commented he thinks if they take the stuff out about the benches and it just says for a plaque which it doesn't. Member Jones indicated the next paragraph states "Donors of benches shall be recognized according to the following criteria: standard recognition plaques shall be used on donated benches to promote consistency in cost, size, type and mounting with plaque language approved by the City. Bench plaques shall be a maximum of 3 inches high by 6 inches wide ". Member -Jones commented that she thinks it works within this policy. She noted what she is hearing is some reluctance about the language of $10,000. She commented that she doesn't know how the Park Board feels about the third paragraph and would like to hear their comments. Member Hulbert noted that he thinks the bidding process sounds a little bit complicated in how they would coordinate it and thinks they should just change it from $10,000 to $5,000. He also pointed out, that he thinks 3 inches by 6 inches is bigger than what the working group had talked about and thought they -had talked about small discreet plaques and not something you could read.from 20 feet away. Member Deeds commented that he thinks 3x6 is fine to which Member Jones replied it's a maximum of 3x6 but that she would happy to make it smaller. Member Jones proposed to keep the bench paragraph and would be curious to hear if somebody wants to speak to the third paragraph. Member Deeds asked Mr. Keprios if he is suggesting that $10,000 is too high and would he like to keep it at $5,000. Mr. Keprios responded that he would recommend it but that $10,000 would certainly further reduce the number of additional plaques and donations in the future. Member Jones replied that if hethinks it will reduce.the number of donations.that is not what her intent was for writing the policy. She pointed out that the current policy has recognition on a board with ranges of donations with your name among other donors; however; that board was never built'so, what they are doing is changing the current policy which would put people's names on a compilation board centrally located to allow individual plaques. She noted that her thinking was they don't really want that many plaques all over the parks and so if they are not going to, be putting a name on :a compilation board but are going to allow individual plaques then they should raise the donation amount. Therefore, that was her logic if you want to suggest that they create an actual compilation board so that people could - donate and have their name for a $5,000 donation then maybe that would be another way to get around it. Member Deeds commented that whether it's $5,000 or $10,000 is it being suggested that somewhere in every park they could have something that would have a sign on it listing the big donors, is that what they are potentially trying to do? Member Jones replied that the original policy that they are rewriting 13 had that wording in it and had one board centrally located and not one in each of the parks. Mr. Keprios explained the concept was to make it look like a challenge and when people walked in to City Hall they would see the boards however, after the new City Hall was built, they were told that there was no wall space available in the new building to attach a donations board onto and so it never happened. Member Jones pointed out that they need to keep in mind that this is a citywide policy and so they want to make sure. that they don't craft it specific to parks so this would be similar to if someone were donating to the Police or Fire Department, etc. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to change it from $10,000 back to $5,000. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Member Hulbert noted again that 3x6 inches is really large and it's going to be first thing you notice when you see that bench and therefore would like to talk about moving it or having it be at the discretion of staff so -that there is consistency in plaque size. Member Jones suggested to Member Hulbert to propose that the paragraph include a wording something like "smaller ti han or as small as possible ". Member Deeds stated that he doesn't see what the. problem is with having it 3x6 it's large enough for people to read he doesn't see what's wrong with having somebody say "In Memory of Joe Smith" and it being,a 3x6 versus it being on 1x2. Member Segreto stated .thafeven if the plaques are on the backs of the benches, especially those that are surrounding a Iake„facing toward the lake, if you are a runner and you are running on the path it can be really distracting, so she disagrees. Member Jones commented that she agrees they should be as small as possible. Member Hulbert replied that it-doesn't have to be as small as possible but he has seen some plaques out there that amno more than about 4 square inches. Chair Steel asked is there a suggestion on the size of the plaque? Member Hulbert made a motion, seconded by>Member Deeds to have the plaques be 6 square inches. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to approve the policy as amended. Ayes:.. Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. VI. C. Veteran's Memorial Sculptor Contract . Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board they are not as far along as he had hoped but between pledges, in- kind donations and cash: they.are, at approximately $170,000. He proposed to the Park Board that they recommend to:the City Council to allow them to sign off on a contract with the sculptor once they have exceeded $100,000-cash in the bank. He commented that they are not going to allow a shovel in the ground 'until'they have all of the money and in -kind committed. He noted that the reason for this is unfortunately the. sculptor needs nine months to build it. Member. Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, for approval of that. Member Segreto asked are they making a motion to approve the contract to which Mr. Keprios replied yes under those conditions. Member Segreto noted that there were three issues that she brought up at the last meeting that have not been incorporated in the contract and she believes the discussion was that everyone thought they were sort of important. 14 Member Segreto made an amendment to the motion, seconded by Member Deeds= to add a paragraph for delivery date, the sculpture shall be completed and delivered to the City on or before and we could put a blank there but the City should put an outside delivery date. On the second page of the contract at the bottom of the venue for disputes right now the dispute venue is stated to be Essex County New York and she would like that to read Hennepin County Minnesota and that the prevailing party should be entitled in addition to such relief as may be granted to a reasonable sum for out -of- pocket expenses, arbitration fees, and all the rest that is written in that sentence. She is adding out -of- pocket expenses and arbitration fees. Member Deeds asked if this contract has been reviewed by the City attorney to which Mr. Keprios replied he intends to do that. Member Deeds suggested they defer until reviewed by the City attorney. Mr. Keprios noted that he will forward Member Segreto's recommendations to the City attorney to look at. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, that regarding the copyright that the sculptor wiffretain the copy to the sculpture except that the Cityshall have the: right to use images of the sculpture for the purposes of fundraising and promoting the Veteran's Memorial and also to use the images of the sculpture in city publications. Member Jones stated that she thinks this issue was brought up before about the fact that while we have the funding for the sculpture we don't yet have funding for the installation of the patio and _courtyard where this_ is going to be placed and would like the Park Board to have a discussion about how everyone feels about committing themselves to this. She pointed out that "Donation Policy" allows for the City to contract for these types of things but it needs to go through the City Council so that City Council realizes where we are on that contract and what we are suggesting. Therefore, she would go by what they just passed which is to say this needs to go to City Council. She added that she would word it more to make suggestions to our policy which requires approval of City Council with the amount needed to complete the project clearly stated and available in the budget. Mr. Keprios noted so that would be $400,000 to .which Member Jones replied yes, that would be part of the statement going to City Council that if we want to approve of this that the City does have the funds to cover this in case we don't. Member Hulbert noted that at this point they are only approving the construction and installation of the sculpture if they secure the financing for that, which is what they are requiring that they do. He stated at this point he is comfortable knowing that it's a commitment to the funds, not just a pledge to the funds. Chair Steel commented that they have an amendment to be voted on and then this sounds like a more general discussion. Member Jones noted that it's just a discussion at this point, she is not adding an amendment she is just clarifying a statement. Chair Steel stated let's vote on the amendment first and then continue on. All in favor of Member Segreto's amendments: Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deed_ s, Segreto Motion Carried. Member Deeds suggested that they further recommend that the contract, not be signed until there is $100,000 of the $400,000 total needed in the Edina Foundation and so the $400,000 is stated clearly there for the City Council. Member Deeds proposed an amendment to the motion, seconded by Member Dan Peterson, that . in the line that reads "I further recommend that the contract not be signed until there is a minimum of $100,000 in the Edina Community Foundation Veteran's Memorial account" be changed to read "Until there is a minimum of $100,000 of the $400,000 needed in the Edina Community Foundation's Veteran's Memorial account ". 15 Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. All in favor of the motion: Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. VI.D. Reschedule November Park Board Meeting Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board under the new "Religious Holiday Policy" because the November Park Board meeting falls on the third day of Diwali of the Hindu religion they will need to find an alternate date for their November Park Board meeting. Member Segreto asked for the Park Board members who may not be able to attend on a different date will that affect their attendance because she feels they make a commitment to serve on a certain date and to the extent that they start moving this date around she thinks that the move date should not be counted in their attendance requirement. Mr. Keprios replied he doesn't disagree and thinks that a recommendation should be brought to the City Council if you establish November 19th as the date for the November Park Board meeting and that it doesn't count against your attendance record of 75 %. Chair Steel pointed out that if you run into canceled meetings you are kind of running the risk of not being able to make up for it so it goes both ways. Chair Steel added that if members are not able to attend a Park Board meeting she will ask them to weigh in if they know it's on the agenda and they can't vote on it. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Hulbert, to accept November 19th as the new meeting date. Ayes: Dan Peterson, Kathryn Peterson, Jones, Steel, Jacobson, Hulbert, Deeds, Segreto Motion Carried. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he is still periodically receiving emails that continue to be added to the master list for both the Hornet's Nest and the Edinborough Park Study. He noted he will continue to periodically forward those emails on. VIII. Chair and Board Member Comments Member Hulbert noted that they had some soccer games at the Braemar Soccer field and all of the parents were raving over the condition of the field. Member Kathryn Peterson informed the Park Board there was an article in the online Star Tribune regarding the Hornet's Nest which she sent to Mr. Keprios so he could send the link to the Park Board members. Member Jones asked if there is any word about the Golf Dome or Sports Dome. Mr. Keprios responded that they expect to see a full report in the next day on the Sports Dome and he thinks that the preliminary results show that it's possible but extremely expensive and more than likely not feasible to even just have a sports dome and clearly there is not enough room for a combination sports dome and golf dome. He noted that it looks like the direction they are going to have to head is to rebuild the golf dome in its current location. He noted that it makes the most sense financially and if they don't end up putting in a sports dome at the Braemar site next to the Gun Range they are going to have to go to Plan B. Member Kathryn Peterson asked will they have an opportunity to have a discussion around the results of their findings to which Mr. Keprios replied he would hope so, yes. Member Deeds asked is the Sports Dome Working Committee now done. Ms. Kattreh replied that she doesn't think they can say that officially. 16 IX Staff Comments Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board to look at the Gallagher Drive roadway improvement packet that he handed out. He noted the packet is what the City Engineer, Wayne Houle, presented to the City Council. He pointed out that it includes one of the first sections they are going to develop knowing that the Nine Mile Trail is coming their way and that it would significantly narrow Gallagher Drive in order to make room for a 10 foot wide path on the east side of Gallagher Drive between West of France and north of . Parklawn. Mr. Keprios stated that Three Rivers Park would pay for approximately $125,000 of that. Member Hulbert asked if they are doing some work in that area is there anything that the golf management would.like to do to improve the signage to bring more visibility to Fred Richards Golf Course. Mr. Keprios replied they could certainly ask and asked Member Hulbert what he might have in mind. Member Hulbert replied he doesn't have anything in mind but he has heard people say it's kind of hard to find to which Mr. Keprios agreed, it's a tough location. Mr. Keprios explained that they have to abide by their own sign ordinance so they are limited that one sign you see is what you get. Chair Steel asked as the Nine Mile Creek project goes forward what is the Park Board's role as little segments are decided. She'commented that she knows the Transportation Commission weighed in and Wondered if they are going to be asked to weigh in on certain sections. Mr. Keprios replied that the Park Board will get to weigh in when there are decisions to be made of any alternations of route but he thinks the Park Board has already given a recommendation and approved a route and this has not deterred'from that. However, if there is something that is different from what you've already recommended it would come back to the Park Board. He stated that he thinks the next step will be that Three Rivers has to secure some federal grant money which isn't expected until about 2014. Mr. Keprios updated the Park Board that the City Council approved the Park Board's recommendations regarding the proposed Hornet's Nest project. The first meeting with our attorney is scheduled for tomorrow to'talk about a memorandum of understanding and begin the process of figuring out the details of how the project will be designed and built. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the City Council approved your recommendation on the "Aquatic Center Priority Use Policy ". He noted that the policy stayed pretty much the same, which states a 75% residency requirement for the Edina Swim Club. Chair Steel commented that she wanted to add she pulled the User Fee's Working Group recommendations from tonight's agenda. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they had to delay the Edinborough Park Study and that it will be in the Park Board's June 12'x' agenda along with the Working Group recommendation. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board if they would like to hear from Kevin Staunton on the Grandview project next month to which Chair Steel replied she thinks they should probably wait on that. Mr. Keprios showed the Park Board and went over the proposed master plan for Countryside Park. He commented that he was. told that the chances of the Waters Development happening is 50150 at best but he still thinks it's going to happen someday. He pointed out that the Countryside Park master plan has some minor changes; however, he would still like to run it by the Countryside Park Neighborhood Group and the Park Board for input. Therefore, if you have any thoughts on this he would appreciate it either by a phone call or email. Meeting adjourned at 9:52 pm. 17 MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, May 8, 2012 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Carr, and Members Stegner, Davis, Moore, Christiaansen, Sussman, Anger, and Copman. Absent were Members Curran, Mellom and Ellingboe. Staff present was Planner Joyce Repya. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel was also in attendance. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Christiaansen moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Anger seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Regular meeting of April 10, 2012 Member Anger moved approval of the minutes from the April 10, 2012, meeting of the board. Member Christiaansen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Update on Boards & Commission Projects I. Finalized Heritage Preservation Board Bylaws Planner Repya provided the Board with copies of the finalized Heritage Preservation Board bylaws that were approved by the City Council. Ms. Repya recommended that board members file the document with their important HPB papers. No formal action was taken. 2. Boards & Commissions Panel Report Member Stegner reported that last week he met with the Boards and Commissions panel headed by Assistant City Manager Karen Kurt. This group, which worked on standardizing the B & C bylaws, has now identified the following tasks they-will undertake: • Develop a common format and protocol for the work plans and reports to City Council • Web site content — need for updating, and provide consistency in data provided • Inter - communication between boards and commissions • Impact of feedback from City Council on B & C priorities • Periodically re- evaluate work of B & C's through a survey A brief discussion ensued after which the board thanked Member Stegner for representing them on the panel; adding that they looked forward to his future reports. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 8, 2012 B. Consultant Vogel Reports I. Preservation Consultant's Roles & Responsibilities Board members received an overview of Consultant Vogel's roles and responsibilities relative to his work with the HPB, which they had requested at the April meeting. A brief discussion ensued regarding the submittal with Mr. Vogel providing clarification on several items. Members thanked Mr. Vogel for the explanation noting that they found it helpful in understanding the services provided by the preservation consultant. 2. Country Club District Plan of Treatment Review Planner Repya explained that since the April meeting she has had several discussions with builders anticipating tearing down two non - heritage resource homes in the Country Club District. Because a majority of the current HPB has never considered a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for a new home in the district, it seemed timely to review the plan of treatment and COA review process. Consultant reviewed the District's plan of Treatment which he likened to an "owner's manual" for managing the area. He also provided copies of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation which is the basis for design review decisions. Copies of previous tear down /new construction submittals were also provided to acquaint the Board with what to expect in a COA application package. Mr. Vogel shared with the Board that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards requires that "The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment ". He added that there is a public misconception that the new construction must be an exact replica of the historic homes that one could not differentiate as new. -He pointed out that the compatibility of the new construction is of utmost importance; focusing on the height, massing, proportion, scale, and architectural characteristics. Member Stegner asked if a home has ever been moved into the District. Mr. Vogel stated that while the plan of treatment would allow a move -in, it is unlikely that would occur. He added that the Morningside neighborhood would be better suited to accommodate that scenario. A question arose regarding whether the plan of treatment protected trees. Mr. Vogel explained that the plan of treatment did not address the trees; however that is an element that can be included in conditions for a COA approval. Board members then thanked Mr. Vogel and Ms. Repya for the COA primer. No formal action was taken. 3. Properties Designated Eligible for Heritage Landmark Designation Board members were provided a list of Edina properties designated as Edina Heritage Landmark properties as well as those designated eligible for landmark designation. A brief discussion ensued relative to the properties included. Planner Repya agreed to add the year designated to each property 2 It Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 8, 2012 on the list. She also agreed to take the properties listed as eligible for designation and provide the Board with a photograph, map and a brief description of each. Chair Carr stated that she would like to see the Board designate at least 2 properties from the determined eligible list as heritage landmark properties, and replace those properties with two more determined eligible. Planner Repya pointed out that several of the property owners have been approached regarding designating their properties as heritage landmarks and they have not been interested. Ms. Carr pointed out that the property owners who have been approached would be good information for the Board as well. Member Stegner agreed with Ms. Carr pointing out that since 2013 is the 125th anniversary of the City, raising the public awareness of the heritage landmark program by adding to the list of properties determined eligible would be a great idea. Addressing Ms. Carr's interest in designating two properties Edina heritage landmarks, it was pointed out that several Morningside bungalow properties are in line for designation as part of the CLG grant awarded. Consultant Vogel added that the Wooddale Bridge was recognized as eligible several years ago, and since it is owned by the City, moving forward with its designation would be a matter of working with the City Engineer. Consultant Vogel pointed out that when determining properties eligible for designation, it is not necessary for the property owner's approval. Member Christiaansen pointed out that if the property owner's approval is not required to be determined eligible, perhaps Southdale Center should be added to the list of eligible properties. A brief discussion ensued, after which the Board agreed that they looked forward to receiving more detailed information of the properties designated as eligible for landmark designation. No formal action was taken. C. Subcommittee & Working Group Updates 1. Southdale Working Group — Sculpture Harry Bertoi — You Tube piece David Anger explained that he had found an interesting You Tube piece on the restoration of a Harry Bertoi sculpture in a New York office building. The sculpture is reminiscent of the Harry Bertoia "Trees" sculpture located in Southdale Center's Garden Court. Due to an equipment malfunction, the video could not be viewed. Planner Repya agreed to download an accompanying article and provide the Board with a link to the video. 2. Tear Down Trend Subcommittee — Recycling Housing Materials Member Davis explained that he has researched the topic of recycling of materials in the construction trades and found an interesting article entitled "Reconstructing the Home ", which he shared with the Board. He also pointed out that he had a conversation with a company that has done a considerable number of tear down /new construction projects in the City and discovered that recycling the older Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 8, 2012 home is a priority. He was told that the firm will often move an older home out of the Edina to a new location in lieu of tearing it down. However, if moving the home is not on option, they attempt to salvage windows, doors, wood floors, and usable plumbing supplies which are then used to rehabilitate existing homes. Member Christiaansen pointed out that there is a program that focuses on energy efficiency for new construction referred to as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) which provides a framework for indentifying and implementing practical green building design and construction. Consultant Vogel pointed out that the Board could recognize contractors who undertake recycling activities when dismantling a home through the COA process through the annual Heritage Award. Board members agreed that would be an excellent idea. Discussion ensued regarding how the topic of recycling building materials is probably within the prevue of the Energy and Environment Commission. Mr. Davis explained that he plans on discussing the issue with the Chairman of the EEC and will report back to the Board. No formal action was taken. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Planner Repya provided the Board with the following emails she had received since the last meeting: • A note of thanks from John Rimarcik, owner of The Convention Grill who received the 2012 Heritage Award. • A notes of thanks from Nick Santrizos, son of the original owners of Convention Grill and Nick Santrizos (nephew of Nick) and grandson of the original owners. • An article written by Jane Lonnquist for the Country Club District newsletter explaining how she used the HPB lending library to research new windows for her home, and encouraged her neighbors to utilize the library too. VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Davis announced that Planner Repya was the 2012 recipient of the Tom Oye Human Rights Award presented at the annual Volunteer Recognition Reception. Nominated by Steve Winnick from Edina's Human Rights and Relations Commission, Ms. Repya was recognized for leading the effort to clarify Edina's early history of segregation evidenced in the Country Club District's early deed restrictions on the City's website. Mr. Winnick explained that Ms. Repya assisted to bridge the gap between misinformation /lack of information and enlightenment. The Board congratulated Ms. Repya and expressed an interest in looking at the clarifying language in the description of the Country Club District page of the HPB's web site. 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 8, 2012 IX. STAFF COMMENTS None X. NEXT MEETING DATE June 12, 2012 XI. ADJOURNMENT 8:45 p.m. Member Moore moved the meeting be adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Member Christiaansen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE HELD AT CITY HALL March 16, 2012 7:30 AM 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Goergen called the meeting to order at 7:30 am 11. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Members Benson, Schwartz and Goergen. Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Lonsbury, Reed, Staff in attendance: John Keprios, Edina Parks and Recreation Department Director III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion by Member Schwartz and seconded by Member Goergen approving the meeting agenda with Member Schwartz adding that he would like to thank Janet Canton for all of the work she did for the committee. Ayes: Benson, Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz and Goergen. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Member Lonsbury and seconded by Member Cardarelle to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of the February 24, 2012 Veterans Memorial Committee Meeting Minutes. Ayes: Benson, Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz and Goergen. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no members of the general public present at the meeting. Vl. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. FUNDRAISING PLAN Member Goergen provided an update from the Edina Community Foundation. He stated that the balance as of the end of February was $2,650 in foundation funds supplemented by the foundation's grant. He indicated that the committee asked for. $10,000 from the board and received $3,700, so they have a total of $6,350 to date. The artist will be paid $3,800 and payments are up to date. Member Goergen indicated that he feels they need to have a fundraising plan, perhaps a pyramid of potential donor amounts to be put in place to provide guidance and for perspective donors when soliciting donations. He stated that Mr. Keprios put together four different pyramid matrix ideas that could be shown in a presentation, as follows. 1. 1 @ $150K; 2 @ $100K; 2 @ $75K = $500K. 2. 1 @ $100K; 2 @ $75K; 2 @ $50K; 5 @ $25K and the remaining $25K from a collection of smaller donations = $500K. 3. 2 @ $75K; 4 @ $50K; 4 @ $25K; $25K from a collection of smaller donations; $25K in -kind donations = $500K. 4. 2 @ $50K; 4 @ $25K; 10 @ $10K; $25K from a collection of smaller donations; $175K in -kind donations = $500K. Mr. Goergen indicated that Member Lefler suggested idea number one and he countered with idea number two, while Mr. Keprios provided ideas three and four to spark dialogue. He explained that although most of the donations will be coming from significant donors, and even if those donations reached their $500,000 goal, they still want to be able to open it up to the community, whatever they deem appropriate to donate. Therefore, all of the above ideas have a balance to be raised after significant donor donations so the entire community will have helped finance the memorial. Member Cardarelle noted that the Rotary Foundation board has requested a presentation. Member Goergen replied that they asked for $20,000 over three years from the Foundation and they indicated that they do want to support the memorial as a signature project. The request has gone to committee and no decision has been made yet as they asked for a presentation to the Foundation committee. Member Goergen and Mr. Keprios are willing to appear before the committee or Rotary Club at their next weekly meeting. Marketing created a video to show to the entire organization, April 12th at 1:00 pm at the Edina Country Club. Mr. Keprios indicated that Member Lonsbury put together a PowerPoint presentation to show to the committee today, which is keyed up and ready to go in the Chambers. Member Cardarelle explained that the Rotary Club is very receptive to showing the presentation. He indicated that he has been in the club for 50 years and wants to be there for the showing. Member Goergen asked about the pyramid determination. Member Lonsbury replied that while he has no specific ideas or experience doing this he thought that the committee should ask for as much as they can and take what they can get, so based on that philosophy he recommended the committee choose idea number one. Member Goergen commented that he doesn't think idea number one is spread out enough, noting that they should seek 25 major donors or a high number. He stated that in a meeting with the Mayor last week he was told an individual that had given a donation recently said that it wasn't the greatest time to be fundraising, especially in this area of the city, thus not a good time to ask for big dollars. He suggested idea number two since it was more spread out and leaves $25,000 for community donations, for a total of $500,000. Member Reed asked if it is considered necessary to have a matrix of numbers to show people. Mr. Keprios replied that it is suggested because when talking to heavy hitters at the beginning of a campaign these people want to know what the plan is, how much they are asking for and from how many individuals; it helps when a goal is shown. Member Benson asked what is Mr. Olson's response to the numbers since he has a lot of experience in this area. Member Goergen replied that the first time they chatted with Mr. Olson he diagramed a pyramid on a napkin and said that the committee needs to have something to show people. Member Reed asked if for idea number two the committee thought there were 10 heavy hitters in the community that could be approached versus five. Member Goergen said the list is still being put together, which Mr. Olson and Member Lefler will be providing. Member Lonsbury stated if an individual gives $100,000 to the project they need to have significant worth and there is those who can do it but they are limited so the concern is spreading it out. The question becomes what is the closing ratio, if we find 100 people can we close on 10 %? Member Goergen suggested the committee come up with a ratio number and then assign monetary amounts to those five or eight people. Member Lonsbury replied that whatever the monetary limits are, he would rather talk to five people who can write checks for $75,000 to $100,000 and try to up sell them. He concluded that their plan should be to search out four to five major donors that support and can contribute 80% of the project. Member Benson stated that even for smaller donations those giving should be followed up with a note, with a secondary tactic of sourcing for possible additional dollars. Member Lonsbury suggested they create an 81/2 x 11 certificate with a thank you letter for their contribution and add a note of who can you tell about what you did and have them forward those names back to the committee. Member Goergen asked if they are given the option, why not show the presentation to as many people as they can as the Rotary Club will give funds but 140 people will be watching the video. The initial goal is financial but secondarily to receive additional names. Motion by Member Lonsbury to take a two -prong approach to fundraising - one, to look at 4 -5 major donors to raise 80% of the anticipated project cost and be recognized on sentinels and two, the remaining 20% to be raised by community organizations, seconded by Member Cardarelle. Member Goergen stated that besides recognition on the memorial they have miniature eagles. Member Lonsbury replied that donors will tell them what the gift condition is. Member Reed replied that obligating the eagles could run them a lot of money. Member Cardarelle suggested they need to leave the type of recognition open. Member Reed stated there is space for more than just one donor on a sentinel. Member Lonsbury replied that if a donor gave $200,000 maybe they could have their own sentinel. Member Benson asked what is Mr. Olson's role working with the committee, as it seems he has the mechanics and enthusiasm to lay out a structure on an ongoing basis and that it would be helpful to have his assistance. Member Goergen replied that they were trying to determine if he was waiting to be asked more formally or to be a paid consultant. Member Benson noted that Mr. Olson's sense is that he doesn't want to be overbearing initially and that he is waiting for the green light to be assertive so he will speak with Mr. Olson for clarification. Ayes: Benson, Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz and Goergen. Motion carried. B. PLAN B Member Goergen, indicating that the memorial cannot be started until funds are in the bank, asked what the plan is if the $500,000 goal is not raised. He suggested one option is to request recommendations from Mr. Kost since he is the architect. He asked if plans remain unchanged and the goal is not met, since the focal point is the eagle and the artist has already renegotiated the contract, should the eagle be purchased with whatever funds are collected so it will be in our possession. Member Lonsbury asked if the memorial can be done in phases, suggesting that the wall with the eagle can be completed and as money comes in the project could continue with the plaza. He expressed that having the eagle in storage didn't sit well. Mr. Keprios replied that if this approach is taken they would have to run it through the public process. He noted that Mr. Kost previously indicated they could consider revisiting materials being used, for example, concrete instead of granite, which could amount in significant savings. Member Lonsbury stated recommendations are needed from the architect and professionals on staff. Mr. Keprios stated that if the goal was not met, to alleviate concern donors should be advised that their donations will not be returned but that something different will be done with the dollars and that they will still be recognized for it. Member Lonsbury suggested donors be told that they will still be building a memorial, and that there are a lot of options for materials, etc. Member Cardarelle indicated he thought the goal was $400,000, but two to three months ago, it was raised to $500,000. He noted that the construction budget stays at $400,000 but that they may need $500,000 in the bank. Member Goergen explained that Mr. Kost provided an estimated budget of $438,000. The committee then discussed the fact that the project cost was over $400,000 and that included in the budget is two optional items, two sentinels and two benches, which after adding these items in the budget was $458,000. At that point, the decision was made to go to at least $450,000 but since they needed City Council approval the budget was raised to $500,000 to cover any additional unknown expenses. Mr. Keprios responded that City Council approved $400,000 so far but they don't want to go back to the council for more after they nail down the number of sentinels. Member Reed asked about in -kind payments. Member Cardarelle stated that they will get in -kind services but that it is hard currently to plug in these numbers, for example how much excavating will cost. He noted there are several companies he can approach. Member Goergen asked about timing for approaching companies to which Member Cardarelle answered when construction starts so they can get contracts out. Member Christiaansen asked if in -kind donations should be sought at 75% completion. Member Lonsbury asked if historically in -kind has been received. He suggested a review of the budget to figure out what real or anticipated costs are compared to in -kind and thought maybe this would be a good exercise before going to donors. Member Goergen replied that they have the budget and can go line by line to figure it out. He noted that as they get closer to goal they should start getting contractors lined up, then when they receive the final approval from City Council there will be no delays. Member Schwartz stated that a basic, written out, timeline is needed indicating what we have to do and where we need to be at what points in time. He proposed this be an agenda item for the next meeting, to come up with a wide timeline starting with when they want to be done and then working backwards. Member Lonsbury added that the timeline should be expanded to planning — who is doing what, when — a project plan is needed, not just dates. Member Goergen noted that they had a timeline to dedicate the memorial of July 4, 2012 but due to the fundraising issue, they will not meet this timeline. Member Schwartz suggested they should have a target of when the memorial will be done. Member Benson suggested someone get a hold of Mr. Olson and have him on the committee to assist with fundraising because this is the key issue right now. Member Lonsbury asked if Member Benson would be interested in co- chairing fundraising for the committee. Member Benson replied that he would be willing to be involved and put forth the effort but that it would be difficult for him to have a set schedule. Member Goergen suggested Mr. Olson be approached and find out if he wants further involvement. He also stated that Denny Schulstad is the Honorary Fundraising Chair and will be the dedication speaker. He is willing to help in any way possible and will be introducing us to three of the six names he gave but beyond that, he doesn't want to be on the committee. Member Reed suggested that the fundraising position be a non -paid position. Mr. Keprios noted that Ms. Bender is not going to be attending committee meetings anymore and recommended Mr. Olson be part of the committee and take over Ms. Bender's spot to head fundraising. He added that he will contact Mr. Olson first and see if he is interested. Motion by Member Benson to remove Ms. Bender from the committee and recommend Mr. Olson be part of the committee to head fundraising, seconded by Member Schwartz. Ayes: Benson, Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz and Goergen. Motion carried. Mr. Keprios noted that City Manager Scott Neil will be going to the legislature to request tax exemption status for this project. V/l. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS A. FUNDRAISING/TREASURER No report. B. MARKETING /COMMUNITY RELATIONS Marketing Chairman John Lonsbury indicated that he will be discussing the brochure with Mr. Keprios and should have something next month. Member Goergen asked about a timeline for updating the website. Mr. Keprios replied that the new city website is about to be launched so they did not want to work on it until afterwards. C. RESEARCH (KIAs) No report. D. DESIGN /ARCHITECTURE Member Christiaansen requested all members please send him quotes so he can start compiling a list and once received this list will be sent to everyone for voting. Member Goergen stated that placement still needs to be decided, maybe on the sentinels. Mr. Keprios stated that Mr. Kost believes there is severe overreaction to the fear of vandalism and that raising the structure two additional feet, to eight feet, will not provide a return on investment, but they could go up to 6'/2 feet. A mock -up of a 6 foot structure will be requested. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 am If Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District with assistance from Barr Engineering Company y� I1V1Y1 � aw W, 4 174 d' Credits This document was developed by Barr Engineering Co. for Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District in partnership with the City of North St. Paul. A special thank you goes to the Citizens Task Force who participated in this project. For more information City of North St. Paul Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District 2400 Margaret Street 2665 Noel Drive North St. Paul, MN 55109 Little Canada, MN 55117 651 - 747 -2400 651 - 792 -7950 www.ci.north- saint - paul.mn.us www.rwmwd.org Barr Engineering Co. Fred Rozumalski, Landscape Ecologist frozumalski@barr.com www.barr.com To download a copy of this document go to www.ci.north- saint- paul.mn.us Table of Contents 1.0 Background ................................................................................ ............................... 1 Surface Water Quality —A Critical Element of Minnesota's Way of Life .......................... 1 Understanding Living Streets ......................................................... ............................... 6 Why Plan for Living Streets Today? ................................................. ............................... 8 Benefits of Living Streets .............................................................. ............................... 10 Policy Basis for Living Streets ....................................................... ............................... 13 Community Task Force Involvement ............................................. ............................... 16 TheVision ................................................................................... ............................... 18 2.0 Living Streets Plan ................................................................... ............................... 19 Assessment of Existing Streets ...................................................... ............................... 19 Typesof Living Streets ................................................................. ............................... 20 ResidentialStreets ................................................................. ............................... 22 North -South Arterial / Collectors .............................................. ............................... 24 East -West Arterial / Collectors .................................................. ............................... 26 TheParkway .......................................................................... ............................... 28 Costof Living Streets ................................................................... ............................... 30 3.0 Design Guidelines ................................................................... ............................... 31 Overall Design Approach ............................................................ ............................... 31 Design Process for Planning a Street Reconstruction Project ........ ............................... 33 4.0 Implementation ....................................................................... ............................... 37 Staff and Council Directed Implementation Programs .................. ............................... 37 Implementation Items Requiring Citizen Involvement and Participation ....................... 41 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines ...................................... ............................A -1 Appendix B— Living Streets Communications Plan .................... ............................... B -1 Appendix C —Draft Bicycle and Sidewalk Plan .......................... ............................... C -1 Appendix D —Grant Funding Sources ........................................ ............................... D -1 Living Streets We're calling the new version of streets for North St. Paul "Living Streets" because the name connotes a street where people are active and nature is accommodated. You may hear other terms like Complete Streets or Green Streets. All these terms mean essentially the same thing. Living Streets are a less expensive way to rebuild North St. Paul streets and includes multiple benefits. This section provides an explanation as to the reasons behind the "Living Streets" project. It details the water - quality problems facing North St. Paul and how these problems can be alleviated with the implementation of stormwater best - management practices that are an integral component of living streets, as defined in this document. It also discusses the deteriorating state of North St. Paul's drinking water pipe system and the imminent need to rip up streets to replace water mains. Lastly, this section defines Living Streets and how they solve multiple problems facing North St. Paul. Lakes with high water quality provide a valuable recreational resource to a community. Surface Water Quality —A Critical Element of Minnesota's Way of Life Our lakes, rivers, streams and wetlands are an essential element of what it means to live in Minnesota. They define our landscape, offer recreational opportunities, and provide habitat for wildlife. In recent years, more attention has been paid to the declining water quality of our lakes, streams, and wetlands. Many of us have become aware of the subtle and not -so- subtle changes in water quality through our personal experiences. For others, the growing list of polluted waters (known as the Impaired Waters List), documented by the Minnesota Pollution Control agency, is the evidence. Section 1.0 Background The MIRCA's Impaired Waters List The MPCA's Impaired Waters List is created by sampling water in Minnesota's lakes. Lakes are placed on the list when they exceed established pollutant level maximums. Legislation has put local units of government in charge of cleaning up impaired waters. The RWMWD and cities in the district (including North St. Paul) are the local units of government responsible for cleaning up Kohlman Lake. In North St. Paul, most of the polluted stormwater from city streets is discharged into Kohlman Creek and then into Kohlman Lake, a shallow water body located in Maplewood. Kohlman Lake is the first lake in the Phalen Chain of Lakes (Kohlman, Gervais, Keller and Phalen). Water from these lakes eventually flows into the Mississippi River. Kohlman Lake is listed on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Impaired Waters List due to excessive nutrients (see side bar). The Kohlman Lake watershed covers approximately 7,500 acres comprised of portions of North St. Paul, Maplewood, Gem Lake, White Bear Lake, Vadnais Heights, Little Canada and Oakdale. A majority of North St. Paul (89 %) drains to Kohlman Lake. The remainder drains to Silver Lake. See map on the next page. How is water quality degraded? Streets are major source of water pollutants. As rainwater washes down the streets, it collects everything in its path — grease, oil, and phosphorus from grass clippings, leaves and fertilizer. The water enters storm drains and then, for the most part, ends up in Kohlman Lake. Phosphorus entering the lake from stormwater runoff causes two water - quality problems: excessive algae and decreased transparency (clarity). Transparency determines how far sunlight can penetrate a body of water, which in turn affects the depth to which plants can grow, having a direct impact on fish habitat. �. When a lake is tilled with sediment and Rainwater from the streets enters storm drains where it (and the pollutants the water carries) end up in Kohlman Lake. Late - summer algal blooms are an unfortunate reality on a number of area lakes. excessive nutrients, its ecological value decreases. 36 r" mitc/ i Section 1.0 Background 0� 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles kv— �les Most of North St. Paul drains to Kohlman Lake. Stormwater drains into the storm sewer system, which empties into Kohlman Creek and down to the lake. Water flows from lake to lake, making its way to Lake Phalen and the Mississippi River. The best place to clean the water running to our lakes is at its source: every street, driveway and parking lot. The Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District ( RWMWD), the City of North St. Paul and other area cities are charged with the task of reducing pollution flowing into area lakes and improving their water quality. The RWMWD has taken the lead in this effort by completing several studies of Kohlman Lake and its watershed in order to develop strategies for improving the lake's water quality. As a partner in this effort, the City of North St. Paul is helping the District implement these strategies. 3 Section 1.0 Background Streetside treatment of stormwater will reduce pollution The problem of runoff pollution is solved most easily by soaking stormwater into the ground. One effective method is to create rainwater gardens that collect stormwater. In North St. Paul, rainwater gardens will run alongside streets. Stormwater from streets and driveways will drain into the rainwater gardens where it will be filtered as it soaks into the ground. Great numbers of these small gardens placed along North St. Paul's streets will significantly remove pollutants and enhance the aesthetic image of the city. a Rainwater gardens are filled with plants that thrive in both wet and dry conditions, providing summer -long beauty. One proven strategy for reducing urban runoff pollution from entering area lakes is soaking stormwater runoff into the ground where it is naturally filtered. This is a great alternative to sending it into pipes that drain untreated into lakes. There are many ways to do this, but one of the most effective and attractive methods is with rainwater gardens, which infiltrate the water into the ground close to where the water is shed (from hard surfaces). Rainwater gardens are constructed along streets as attractive community features that also water street trees and create a great neighborhood "feel." With the city's aging drinking water and sanitary sewer pipes, and some streets in need of replacement over the next 20 years, the city has an opportunity to re- invent the function of its streets. As streets undergo reconstruction, we have an opportunity to incorporate stormwater treatment features as well as other features that improve transportation mobility, safety and quality of life. We refer The city has a to a vision of street reinvention unique opportunity as "Living Streets." The rest of this to re- invent its report discusses this concept and approach for re- inventing the streets. streets of North St. Paul. An opening in a curb allows water to flow from the street into a rainwater garden for a triple benefit: stormwater is prevented from reaching storm drains; it is filtered as it soaks into the ground; and it provides water to the plants and trees in the garden. The result is a highly functional and attractive neighborhood amenity. Section 1.0 Background How do rainwater gardens work? retaining wall curb ,I ' rainwater garden As it rains, water flotrs down the street and enters the rainwater garden through a pipe or curb cut. The water then soaks into the ground, usually within 24 hours. The plants' roots absorb nutrients from the water and help filter out pollutants. The water eventually enters the groundwater table, rather than entering a lake through the stormwater system. During flood events, the rainwater gardens provide extra storage for stormwater and greatly reduce the amount of water that reaches storm drains, and therefore the lake. Rainwater gardens become beautiful neighborhood amenities (the curb cut is located out of the picture frame to the left). 5 Section 1.0 Background What is a Living Street' "Living Streets" is a term used to describe efficient use of the public rights -of -way. It is about enhancing the functionality of these public corridors. It starts by preserving the important function of accommodating traffic, parking, and underground utilities, but additionally improves accommodations for pedestrians, bicycles and nature in the form of street trees and rainwater gardens. 0 Living Streets provide safe passage for pedestrians. Many citizens of North St. Paul don't have cars or would enjoy better opportunities to get outside and walk. Understanding Living Streets The streets of North St. Paul play an integral role in the life of our citizens. They are intended for everyone —young or old, motorist or bicyclist, walker or wheelchair user, bus rider or shopkeeper. We can improve on the current design to better accommodate walkers, bikes and public transportation. Our streets and public right -of- way could also better accommodate the cleansing power of nature for stormwater, and the protection and beauty that trees provide. Streets in the past were designed and built in an era where the focus was only on moving cars quickly and efficiently. Today we have the opportunity to design multi - purpose streets. Living Streets is a term that addresses these livability and environmental needs of our community and describes a design approach for rebuilding streets. Communities across the country are embracing this design approach and asking their planners and engineers to build road networks that are safer for pedestrians, slow traffic, provide neighborhood cohesiveness, provide aesthetic value, and improve the quality of our lakes and streams by reducing stormwater pollution. Living Streets are designed to balance convenience for motorists with bike and pedestrian safety, water - quality protection, and the beauty of street trees. 0 a 0 a s z I; 3 L d a a 0 Njamow— '`" `"" Right -Of -Way idewalk Con Curb an Gutter Curb Extension Public Art —) Component F W The primary elements of a Living Street. situ iT RoadW Street Trees Right -of -Way Rainwater Garden P x Section 1.0 Background What does a Living Street look like? Each Living Street is unique. Ingredients that may be found on a complete green street include: • sidewalks • bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders) • parking where needed • comfortable and accessible transit stops • marked crossing opportunities • pedestrian signals • curb extensions • rainwater gardens • trees • vegetation They are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the street along with water quality protection. This Living Street features curb extensions, a bike lane, sidewalks, and trees. VA z O v c C 0 a i U 5 v i d a Section 1.0 Background Why Plan for Living Streets Today? North St. Paul's drinking water pipes are beginning to deteriorate. Some are up to 75 years old; many are likely to fail soon. The sanitary sewer system is also aging, although not so significantly. Replacing water mains most often requires that streets be demolished for access. This disruption of streets creates an opportunity to reinvent North St. Paul's streets to better fit the needs of today's and future residents. Similar to a home remodeling project, the design of these street projects will consider the needs of the city's future residents and businesses to ensure the city remains an attractive and competitive place to live and do business compared to other options that exist in the north metro area. North St. Paul will have to replace By integrating the transportation, environmental and quality of life deteriorating water mains. This is needs into a Living Streets framework now, the design work for the perfect opportunity to redesign streets to accommodate people's individual street reconstruction projects will be implemented more needs and create a healthier, cleaner efficiently and at lower cost. environment. The goal is to create a balance between the important functions of traffic conveyance and utilities with the important functions of nature. StormWater captUr Pedestrees a and use rian Pedestr;an of n,ent 8ikes etY Com Aestheti mhnitty a eter Infrastructure Traditionally there has been an imbalance between differing uses of public streets. Traftjc Speed Sewers Gas Flectr i c Storm elecon� water drainage Section 1.0 Background When utilities, cars, people and nature are all taken into account, streets take on greater community value. Stormwater capture and use Trees Pedestrian movement Pedestrian safety Bikes Community Aesthetic character Infrastructure Traffic Speed Sewers Gas Electric Telecom Stormwater drainage This plan is an effort to balance the important role of streets to move traffic and accommodate utilities with the equally important need for alternative forms of transportation and a cleaner environment. Section 1.0 Background Benefits of Living Streets Most of us think of America as the land of choices. Yet, in just about any community built in the last 50 years, there is pretty much one choice for transportation: the car. North St. Paul isn't any different than most American cities in this regard. Living Streets provide many transportation choices to the diverse range of city residents and it balances those choices to provide community, environmental and economic benefits as well. Walkable streets raise home values Studies show that homes in more walkable neighborhoods have higher values than similar homes in less- walkable areas. The report, "Walking the Walk: How Walkability Raises Housing Values in U.S. Cities" by Joseph Cortright, analyzed data from 94,000 real estate transactions in 15 major markets and found that in 13 of 15 markets, higher levels of walkability were directly linked to higher home values. Surveys indicate that shoppers spend more time and money in commercial districts with tree -lined streets. 10 Living Streets have economic benefits because they Make Fiscal Sense. Smaller streets, less pavement and fewer underground storm sewer pipes cost less to build. These are savings that residents will notice on special assessments associated with their street reconstruction project. Lower Long Term Maintenance Costs. Smaller streets also cost less to plow and repair benefiting the city's annual budget and taxpayers. Increase Property Values. Walkable communities with tree lined streets and slowed traffic increases neighborhood desirability and property value, an asset residents will realize at the time of sale. Spark Economic Revitalization. By making local businesses more accessible to bicyclists and walkers, residents are more likely to shop locally and encouraging local business investment and job growth. Research shows that shoppers are attracted to businesses with tree lined streets. Good bike and pedestrian access to downtown could help business. Living Streets build community because they: Help Children. Streets that provide room for safe walking and biking help children get physical activity and gain independence. More children walk to school where there are sidewalks, and children who have safe walking and bicycling routes have a more positive view of their neighborhood. Improve Public Health. By offering easy opportunities for walking and bicycling, living streets encourage a healthy life -style for people of all ages, especially the elderly, and are an important strategy to combat obesity. Increase Safety. Traffic - calming elements like curb extensions, bump -outs and narrowed streets improve safety by reducing traffic speeds. Streets are safer for walkers, bicyclists, children, the elderly, as well as for drivers. Enhance Neighborhood Beauty and Strengthen a Sense of Community. By making room for the planting of trees and rainwater gardens, our neighborhoods become more beautiful and attract young families that make communities thrive. Living Streets improve environmental quality because they: Improve Water Quality of Lakes and Streams. Rainwater gardens along roads intercept and filter stormwater runoff. Much of it soaks into the ground to water street trees while over flow water during big storms is filtered by plants before making its way to the storm sewer pipe that takes it to Kohlman Lake and ultimately further downstream to the Mississippi River. Improve Air Quality. By providing space for walking and biking, complete green streets reduce the emissions of CO2 and other pollutants harmful to the planet and human health. Trees also filter the air, trapping dust. Reduce the Urban Heat Island Affect. Less asphalt and more street trees reduce heat build -up in pavement and in the ambient air during hot summer days making outdoor activities more comfortable and reducing air conditioning costs in our homes and businesses. Reduce Raw Material and Energy Used in Street Construction. Smaller streets require less asphalt, gravel beneath the street and other natural resources, and requires less energy used for their construction than larger conventional streets. This reduces the pollution and greenhouse gases emitted during the manufacturing and transporting of these materials. Section 1.0 Background aml- Safety for children is a primary concern. Living Streets will provide safe walking and bicycling routes. High speeds lead to greater chance of serious injury 85% and death 45% 15% 32 kenih 30 km /h 6S km /h 20 MPH 30 MPI 1 40 MPI1 Pedestrians' chances of death if hit by a motor vehicle at different speeds. Lill Section 1.0 Background What are the benefits of street trees' Living Streets promote the planting of street trees. Trees provide many benefits to the environment and community. The past few decades of tree research has focused on documenting and quantifying the benefits of trees. Early on, researchers were quantifying the amount of greenhouse gases trees remove from the atmosphere (about Yz ton of carbon dioxide per tree per year) and pollutants (about 4.3 pounds of pollutants per tree per year). Since then, researchers have begun to document an ever growing list of benefits that may not be so obvious. Environmental Benefits In addition to the direct removal of greenhouse gases and pollutants, mentioned above, trees: • Reduce temperatures by shading streets, sidewalks and other hardscapes, resulting in reduced use of electricity. • Increase the amount of water that reaches the groundwater table by helping water soak into the ground. • Intercept rain with leaves and branches, reducing the amount of water that reaches the storm system. • Add organic matter'to the soil which further improves the water - holding capacity of the soil. • Improve the resiliency of soil to respond to rain events. One mature tree can capture over 5,000 gallons of water in a year. • In whole, trees can reduce stormwater by about 2% for each 5% increase in the community's tree canopy. • Reduce soil erosion with dense root systems. Less soil, contaminated or clean, reaches the stormwater system, creeks and rivers. 12 Community Benefits Trees help promote pride in the community and a sense of place, as well as providing a long list of other direct and indirect benefits. • Street trees are an important factor in reducing road maintenance costs, by shading the pavement from the sun. • Tree - filled neighborhoods show lower levels of domestic violence. • Street trees can calm traffic and lower traffic speed by reducing the perceived width of street. • Trees help reduce noise levels. • Trees are known to shorten hospital stays and reduce workplace stress. • Trees can be used to screen unsightly views. • Healthy trees in neighborhoods enhance property values, increasing sale prices by 1 % for each large front - yard tree and 10% for a specimen tree. • Trees are also good for business. Surveys of shoppers in commercial districts with tree -lined streets reported that they shop there more frequently, shop longer, are willing to pay for parking, and spend on average 12% more on goods. Section 1.0 Background Policy Basis for Living Streets Inspiration from other Cities and Agencies Communities across the country are realizing the "green" potential of their streets. Making our transportation system more sustainable involves many policies and practices that minimize environmental impact and create streets that are safe and comfortable for everyone regardless of age, ability, or mode of transportation. In Minnesota, a number of communities and transportation organizations have already begun the process of reinventing the street. The City of Rochester, for example, has implemented a comprehensive and detailed complete streets policy in 2009 after a multi -year review of policy options and implementation approaches by their city council and city staff. City of Rochester, MN Complete Streets Policy The policy focuses on enhancing the safety, access, convenience and comfort of all users of all ages and abilities, including pedestrians (including Americans with Disabilities Act compliant accessibility), bicyclists, transit users, motorists and freight drivers, through the design, operation and maintenance of a connected and balanced transportation network. The policy recognizes that all streets are different and that the needs of various users will need to be balanced in a flexible manner. The policy requires that bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities shall be included in street construction, re- construction, re- paving, and re- habilitation projects. A feasibility report prepared for each street project shall include documentation of compliance with this policy. The policy allows flexibility in implementing the policy under certain conditions: • The City Engineer determines there is insufficient space to safely accommodate new facilities. • The City Engineer determines there are relatively high safety risks. • The City Council exempts a project due to the excessive and disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. . The policy includes a wide range of transportation facilities and amenities for consideration in qualified street projects: • Street and sidewalk lighting • Sidewalks and pedestrian safety improvements such as median refuges or crosswalk improvements • Improvements that provide ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) compliant accessibility • Transit accommodations including improved pedestrian access to transit stops and bus shelters • Bicycle accommodations including bicycle storage, bicycle parking, bicycle routes, shared -use lanes, wide travel lanes or bike lanes as appropriate • Street trees, boulevard landscaping, street furniture • Drainage facilities 13 Section 1.0 Background Many cities are making an effort to cultivate and support a way of life that encourages physical activity. 14 The City of St. Paul passed a complete streets resolution in 2009 directing staff to complete an implementation plan in 2010. Implementation of a complete streets philosophy is an integral component of "Access Minneapolis," the City of Minneapolis' transportation plan. In 2005, Ramsey County Active Living (ALRC) was created. This collaborative effort of county, city, school, health plans and residents is working to bring about and sustain changes in design, transportation, and public /private policies to cultivate and support a way of life that integrates physical activity into daily lives. Ramsey County Active Living Goals Improve Health by increasing the number of: • Adults who engage in leisure time physical activity • Trips made by walking and bicycling Enhance the Built Environment by: • Promoting the pedestrian and bicycle system in new construction and reconstruction projects • Encouraging a comprehensive multi -modal transportation system in Ramsey County • Identifying and reducing barriers to active living through physical projects Influence Policy by: • Supporting and encouraging local government policies that integrate active living principles into plans, ordinances, and zoning codes • Identifying and reducing barriers to active living through policy influence • Identifying and working to reduce health disparities in physical activity in target populations WM, Hennepin County developed a complete streets policy in 2009. The policy applies to all corridors under county jurisdiction. The County is committed to working with other transportation agencies to incorporate a complete streets philosophy in adjacent jurisdictions. The State of Minnesota adopted a complete streets policy on May 15, 2010. The policy is intended to promote context - sensitive street designs on state -aid roadways. This is the first such state policy in the nation. Living Streets Implements the North St. Paul Comprehensive Plan This project is an expression of the goals contained in North St. Paul's Comprehensive Plan, which is the city's guide for development, redevelopment and preservation of the community. Living streets provide a comprehensive and effective strategy for realizing the city's vision of becoming "an extraordinary small town in the Cities!" and achieving many goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This Living Streets plan will help North St. Paul achieve five of the Comprehensive Plan's nine goals: Goal 1: Image Develop themes, prepare plans, and implement plans which will enhance and improve the image of the city in downtown, the highway 36 corridor, and in each of the city's residential neighborhoods. Goal 4: Transportation Achieve a functional, aesthetic, and balanced system which includes pedestrian ways, sidewalks, trails, local streets, collectors, arterials, a freeway and transit. Goal 7: Parks, Open Spaces and Trails Enhance and expand the park, open space and trail system, especially in the highway 36 corridor. Goal 8: Environment Protect and enhance the lakes, wetlands, woods, and wildlife and promote actions, practices and developments which tend to sustain the environment. Goal 9: Active Living Establish a climate and an urban pattern for active living to create and sustain changes in land use design, building design, transportation, public policies and project to cultivate, support and integrate physical activity into daily life. Section 1.0 Background Youth and seniors are growing proportion of North St. Paul's population Population projections for Ramsey County show that the percentage of the population that is both under 20 and 65 and older will grow significantly over the next 25 years. These populations are the most dependent on alternatives to the car for mobility. The age distribution of the population for North St. Paul was very . similar to that of Ramsey County in the 2000 Census and is assumed to be similar to the projections for Ramsey County. Source: 2000 Census and MN Department of Adminis- tration /Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis for 2010, 2010, and 2035 Ramsey County projections. is Percent of Ramsey County population dependent on 1 alternatives to motorized transportation (people under 20 Year and 65 and older) 2000 40% 2010 39% 2020 42% 2035 46% Source: 2000 Census and MN Department of Adminis- tration /Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis for 2010, 2010, and 2035 Ramsey County projections. is Section 1.0 Background The 15- member task force toured the streets of North St. Paul. 16 Community Task Force Involvement It was important from the start to have citizen involvement in the creation of this plan. Feedback from those who will use and maintain the streets was critical. The City Council appointed a task force to guide the development of this plan. The 15- member task force was comprised of North St. Paul residents, businesses, city staff and a council representative. The task force met six times from June through October 2009. Involvement of the task force focused on: Learning about living streets. The task force reviewed studies and literature about green streets, discussed current opportunities for walkers and bikers, shared ideas about environmental quality, discussed costs and benefits, and conducted a field trip to inspect local examples in the Twin Cities. Developing Design Objectives. This process included identifying community concerns and needs. This discussion was followed by clarifying Comprehensive Plan goals and policies into specific project design objectives that would address the identified concerns and needs. The design objectives guided the development of recommended design guidelines in Section 2. Identifying locations and priorities for bike trails and sidewalks to better connect the community. The bike trail and sidewalk plan will supplement the transportation plan chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. (Refer to Appendix C.) Reviewing and giving feedback on proposed design strategies for different types of streets found in North St. Paul. The design objectives developed by the task force were used to evaluated design alternatives and for making recommendations on preferred design alternatives. Section 1.0 Background Design Objectives The Task Force developed the following design objectives to provide guidance for developing Living Streets design concepts. Each design objective is listed along with the comprehensive plan goal it supports. Specific design strategies identified for achieving the objectives are also listed. Objective 1: Improve stormwater runoff quality Strategy: Infiltrate at least the first inch of rainfall from city streets near the street edge. Supports the city's environmental goal and RWMWD goal. Objective 2: Reduce impervious surfaces Strategy: Convert some parking lanes for water treatment & bike /pedestrian circulation on: • Residential streets, but retain enough parking to meet demand • Collector /arterial streets where side yards typically abut the street • Other corridors where parking demand is low. Supports the city's environmental goal Objective 3: Calm traffic Strategy: Use rainwater gardens, curb bump outs and other techniques as appropriate to slow traffic. Supports the city's active living and transportation goals. Objective 4: Improve bike /pedestrian connectivity Strategy: Create bike lanes /trails along major transportation roads (e.g. South Ave. 17th Ave.). Strategy: Connect schools, parks, commercial areas, and downtown with sidewalks and bike routes. Supports the city's transportation and active living goals. Objective 5: Protect and enhance the urban forest Strategy: Protect and retain existing street trees as much as possible. Strategy: Meander new sidewalks around existing trees in order to protect them. Strategy: Use vegetation and other physical features to create a look unique to city. Supports the city's environmental and image goals. Objective 6: Minimize long -term maintenance costs Strategy: Reduce amount of pavement to maintain and to replace in the future. Strategy: Design for ease of maintenance. Supports the city's goal of cost effective management of infrastructure. 17 Section 1.0 Background The Vision By incorporating North St. Paul's values, needs and concerns expressed by the Task Force, this plan envisions the city becoming A city with healthy residents and attractive, safe streets characterized by natural systerns that integrate throughout the city. Through the use of vegetation and a reduction in paved surface, the city makes room for nature and its restorative benefits for people of all ages and ability to travel safely throughout the city. is IN' .1 1 slltmj-� This section describes the plan for making improvements to the city's street system. It describes the various street types found in North St. Paul and the opportunities for converting these streets, over time, into Living Streets. Assessment of Existing Streets It is important to understand the different types of streets (based on traffic volume) that exist in North St. Paul. The successful creation of Living Streets will respond to the important needs of moving traffic, accommodating differences in neighborhood character, supporting land use type (residential, commercial, industrial) and improving environmental quality. This plan recognizes the existing functional classification of the city's streets as determined by Minnesota transportation agencies and officials. This plan emphasizes the importance of retaining "functional" classification of streets and an emphasis on vehicle mobility. North St. Paul's streets are generally classified as either local (residential streets), collector streets (busier streets like Margaret or 17th St.), and arterial (very busy streets like McKnight Rd. and Century Ave.). �c 19 Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan Residential Street— 1 Sth Ave. E. North -south Arterial/Collector- Margaret Street East -West Arterial /Collector -17th Ave. E. 20 Types of Living Streets This plan considers three general street types currently found in North St. Paul. The street types are described below and shown in the map on the opposite page. Residential Streets —Low traffic streets with slower speeds. North -South Arterials /Collectors— Higher traffic streets that connect neighborhoods with commercial areas, downtown and adjacent communities. (e.g., McKnight Rd., Margaret St., Helen St., First St., Century Ave.) East -West Arterials /Collectors— Higher traffic streets that connect neighborhoods with commercial areas and adjacent communities. (e.g., 17th Ave., South Ave. and Holoway Ave.) This plan also creates a new street type: The Parkway —A visually prominent recreational corridor that includes bike trails, sidewalks, stormwater treatment, and enhanced vegetation. It will create a central parkway though town connecting Casey Lake Park to Polar Park to downtown and down to Southwood Nature Preserve. The map on the following page illustrates the pattern of Living Streets for North St. Paul. Each of these street types is described on the following pages. This plan does not currently address the city's downtown main street (7th Avenue) or new streets envisioned as part of the Diversified District. These street types are very important elements within the fabric of the current and future city. However, a separate concentrated effort is required to develop living street concepts to address the unique challenges in these two environments. These areas are not included in this report. Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan LINNOMEM4ROMM ME IMInt- legend street templates map --]main street north /south arterial north /south collector yeast /west collector /arterial parkway 21 Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan Streets, such as this one, present the greatest opportunity to create new landscape space for stormwater treatment and trees, and sidewalks for pedestrians. Yield Streets A yield lane can be used where traffic flow is low to accommodate two -lane traffic with a single lane. One vehicle passes the other by slowing and waiting in the parking lane for the other vehicle to pass. Residential Streets As the most common street type in North St. Paul, residential streets offer the best opportunities for living streets design solutions. These streets have the fewest conflicts with underground utilities and have under -used parking zones. As a result, they present the greatest opportunity to create new landscape space for stormwater treatment and trees, and sidewalks for pedestrians. Most residential streets will be reconstructed in the near future as water mains are replaced and sanitary sewers are repaired. Recommended features of Living Streets include: • Street trees • Rainwater gardens flanking the street • Sidewalks on one side of the street (as per the Draft Bicycle and Sidewalk Plan —see Appendix C) • Street width of 22 feet to accommodate one parking lane and a single yield lane (queuing lane) • Curbs • Public art/artful design Existing residential street layout 22 Proposed residential street layout Concrete Curb and Gutter Existing Street Edge Right -Of -Way —\ Retainir M Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan .ref, r AL r Bituminous Roadway r r Street Trees itiA Right -of -Way v :R •-� � Sidewalk Rainwater Garden r. Public Art Component 23 Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan Margaret Street, a North -South Arterial /Collector street The plan will safely accommodate pedestrians and people on bikes and in wheelchairs on the city's busier streets. North -South Collectors These roads connect residential areas to schools and commercial areas. However, many of these roads are without sidewalks and bike facilities which present safety concerns for walkers and bicyclists. These roads are State Highways or State Aid roads and thus reconstruction plans must also meet design standards determined by the Ramsey County and the State of Minnesota. Because of the configuration of North St. Paul's blocks (primary streets run east - west), most homes and businesses face east -west streets. Most parking demand is on these streets. Conversely, parking demand on north -south streets is fairly low because few homes or businesses face them. This creates opportunities to convert existing and often unused parking areas on north -south streets to bike lanes, sidewalks, street trees and rainwater gardens. Features of the North -South arterial /collector streets include: • Street trees • Rainwater gardens flanking the street • Bike lanes on both sides of the street • Sidewalks on at least one side of the street • Parking where needed by adjacent property owners (e.g., churches, businesses); otherwise, no parking. Parking created by extending curb into the right -of -way. • Two 10 -foot driving lanes • Arterial streets like McKnight Rd. and Century Ave. have very high traffic and are not considered part of the Living Street system. ♦ + i WN�.._IOLANE�__ 'OLANE E S11 L i NOTE: State Aid Roadways will require special coordination with jurisdictional authorities regarding design criteria. 24 A Right -Of -Way Sidewalk Alley Concrete Curb and Gutter Existing Street Edge —� Public Art Component Seccion 2.0 Living Streets Plan ' 1 r Bumpout Parking Street Trees Bituminous Roadway ,00-- Alley Right -of -Way Existing Street Edge Rainwater Garden t 25 Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan 17th Ave, an East -West Arterial/ Collector street J 17th Ave, an East-West Arterial/ Collector street South Ave, an East -West Arterial/ Collector street 26 East -West Arterial /Collectors These higher traffic volume streets serve to connect North St. Paul to adjacent cities and connect residential areas to schools and commercial areas. Portions of these roads are currently without sidewalks and bike facilities. This presents safety concerns for walkers and bicyclists wishing to travel these routes. These roads are State Highways or State Aid facilities and thus reconstruction plans must also meet design standards created by Ramsey County and the State of Minnesota. Homes and businesses front on these streets, creating some parking demand. However, parking demand is relatively low and parking is banned during the winter. Since these streets are not used heavily for parking, opportunities exist to convert some existing parking to bike lanes, sidewalks, street trees and rainwater gardens. Features of the East -West arterial /collector streets include: • Street trees • Rainwater gardens flanking the street • Bike lanes on both sides of the street • Sidewalks on one side of the street • Parking on one side of the street, contained within curb extensions • Two 10 -foot driving lanes I I�� 6' 8'9' 1 10' DRIVE 10' DRIVE S" IK PARKIN LANE LANE LANE BOULEVARD - - ROADWAY WIDTH VARIES RAINGARDEN 66 TYPICAL RIGHT -OF -WAY NOTE: State Aid Roadways Will require special coordination with jurisdictional authorities regarding design criteria. "D . ) Right -Of -Way Sidewalk Concrete Curb and Gutter Existing Street Edge Curb Extension Public Art — Component Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan AM Bituminous Roadway Right -of -Way Street Trees Existing Street Edge r Rainwater Garden 27 ._ Right -Of -Way Sidewalk Concrete Curb and Gutter Existing Street Edge Curb Extension Public Art — Component Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan AM Bituminous Roadway Right -of -Way Street Trees Existing Street Edge r Rainwater Garden 27 Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan The trail will stretch through Southwood Nature Preserve. 28 The Parkway A north -south recreational parkway is proposed to connect Casey Lake Park and Polar Park to downtown and down to Southwood Nature Preserve (see figure on the facing page). The intent is to create a beautiful North St. Paul amenity that links walkers and bikers to primary destinations (businesses and parks) and adds value to the city. This central green spine through the city is meant to easily and safely bring people to three schools and into downtown. It will also serve as the perfect location for an evening stroll or a safe bikeway for families with small children. The greenway will look as described above as North -South Collectors, but will be inherently quieter because it runs through residential neighborhoods. It will vary, however, depending on the neighborhood through which it passes. For example, the southern reach does not accommodate cars but provides for continuous biking. Features of the parkway include: • Street trees • Rainwater gardens flanking the street • Bike lanes on both sides of the street • Sidewalks on one side of the street • Two 10 -foot driving lanes • A 10 -foot walk/bikeway where paths are created through parks and public lands. rg 0 g A c S u c g A A d Ld r d rk Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan legend -) proposed parkway 19 Section 2.0 Living Streets Plan Cost of Living Streets North St. Paul streets will require reconstruction to replace water mains and pavement. It is of primary concern to the citizen task force that Living Streets not be more expensive than reconstructing streets as they exist today. This is indeed the case. There are trade -offs between what is gained with Living Streets and what is eliminated in the streets that exist today. The advantages of Living Streets are numerous. The expense of constructing new elements such as rainwater gardens (now required by law), sidewalks, public art and trees is compensated by savings accomplished through eliminating parking on one side of the street. For example, a savings of 15% or more on pavement (the most expensive ticket item on a street reconstruction project) occurs by reducing the width of a residential street from 30 feet to 22 feet. By building less roadway, future maintenance and replacement costs are also reduced. For example, narrowing a residential street from 30 feet to 22 feet could result in a 25% reduction in maintenance costs; as much as $1,000 per mile per year. These ongoing savings provide financial resources from which to provide maintenance for street trees and other green infrastructure if needed. Typical street maintenance costs include: • Crack fill /seal coat within five years of initial construction • Mill /overlay at around 20 -25 years • Crack fill /seal coat within 5 years of mill /overlay Based on the assumptions above, the city could realize $50,000 in life -cycle maintenance cost savings per mile of roadway over the life of the road. There would be additional saving in the cost of snow plowing since there would be less street to plow. Like every street, each reconstruction project is unique. Costs will vary depending on the scope of each project. Issue Why Create Living Streets?, Existing Big Streets Living Streets Construction Cost Expensive because the cost of blacktop is 25% less pavement reduces street construction skyrocketing. cost by 15% or more. Maintenance Cost Cost the city more to plow in the winter Living streets reduce maintenance cost by and contains more pavement to repair and $1,000 per mile of street per year. replace. Safety Wide streets tell people it is safe to drive Narrower streets, gardens, and trees slow fast. down drivers because objects in their periphery signal them to slow down. Pollution Pollutes the water. A Burnsville, MN study shows that treating stormwater in rain gardens reduced phosphorus discharge to Crystal Lake by 89 %. Trees Treeless streets are hot in the summer. Healthy trees in neighborhoods enhance property values; increasing sale prices by 1% for each large front yard tree. 30 This section describes guidelines to be used to direct the design and construction process for street reconstruction projects. They are intended to supplement and guide standing practices related to City of North Saint Paul streets. The street templates and guidelines are to be implemented in a flexible manner on a project -by- project basis to achieve impervious surface reduction and stormwater treatment in the right -of -way, and to create less resource consumptive streets that serve the people of North St. Paul. Overall Design Approach In partnership, the City, Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District ( RWMWD) and the people of North St. Paul will create Living Streets for the health of their citizens and the watershed. The City and RWMWD will work together through the design process to share ideas, facilitate public engagement, and coordinate roadway reconstruction with stormwater pollution prevention. A holistic re- invention of North Saint Paul Streets is intended. Three principles set the individual project design team's direction and priorities regarding design, material selections, construction and ongoing stewardship of the public realm. Design elements used in the streetscape should be planned in the spirit of these principles (see next page). 31 Section 3.0 Design Guidelines Specific Design Elements Design Principles for North Saint Paul Streets Detailed guidelines for 1. Every street reconstruction project will create valuable specific design elements places for neighborhood activity and active living. are included in Appendix • Manage precipitation where it falls by promoting A. Elements discussed there Connect neighborhoods and daily destinations with a include: comfortable, safe walking and biking network for people of 8. Sidewalks and Crosswalks all ages and abilities. 1. Design Process • Manage rainwater as a resource, not a waste product. 10. Public Art • Calm auto traffic. 2. Street Design drinking water treatment and to save energy. 11. Utilities • Identify and build upon the assets of each neighborhood in 3. Infiltration Basins every project. 4. Filtration Basins Showcase natural resources in the streetscape. 5. Soil Preparation and Soil 2. Design infrastructure to mimic the natural hydrologic Amendments � cycle. 6. Plantings and Street Trees • Manage precipitation where it falls by promoting 7. Curbs and Curb infiltration into conditioned soils with deep-rooted Extensions vegetation. 8. Sidewalks and Crosswalks • Reduce hard surface area (pavement). 9. Bicycle Lanes • Manage rainwater as a resource, not a waste product. 10. Public Art • Practice water conservation (reduce irrigation) to reduce drinking water treatment and to save energy. 11. Utilities 3. Establish living systems to function as infrastructure. 32 • Utilize the robust natural processes of trees, deep - rooted vegetation and soil life to treat pollutants in stormwater and the atmosphere, combat urban heat island effect, sequester carbon and reduce runoff. • Promote habitat connectivity and biodiversity. • Properly utilize sun and shade to reduce energy consumption in buildings. • Utilize construction materials and methods with reduced ecological footprints, including material recycling practices. Section 3.0 Design Guidelines Design Process for Planning a Street Reconstruction Project The following general design process is intended to be flexible. It is intended to identify the major steps that apply to each street segment reconstruction, but is not considered all inclusive. The design process must be considered in conjunction with the implementation process set forth in the public participation and Living Streets Design and Implementation Process featured in Section 4.0 of this document. Depending on the extent of reconstruction required for any given street, projects could typically take on of the following forms: Street Stormwater Street Reconstruction Option Treatment Pavement Option 1 Retrofit BMPs Protect pavement with remaining usable life Option 2 Retrofit BMPs Protect pavement with remaining usable life Option 3 Retrofit BMPs Replace /recondition Option 4 Full construction Full reconstruction Once a reconstruction project is identified, a four -step design sequence should be used. Start off on the right path by involving a design team with experienced engineer(s) and landscape architect(s) from the beginning. Step 1 – Conduct Public Meeting —The city announces its intent to reconstruct a street: • Conduct a public meeting to announce the project, to inform citizens about the Living Streets approach, and to obtain public "buy -in." Step 2 – Site Analysis —The site analysis will gather necessary data and identify key design constraints and opportunities for the street: • Using the appropriate street template presented in this plan as a starting point, perform site analysis for the concept street layout. • If a street under consideration is in the jurisdiction of a non - city entity (such as county, state or federal), begin project discussions with those entities as early as possible in the design process to discuss roadway design criteria such as lane widths, relative to legal standards. Determine if a variance to standards is necessary, and identify an authorization path forward. El D Underground Utilities Protect utilities with remaining usable life Replace /recondition utilities in -place Protect utilities with remaining usable life Full reconstruction 33 Section 3.0 Design Guidelines 34 • Obtain detailed existing topographic, existing utility and soils data. • Identify any special roadway needs related to traffic, pavements, intersections, parking, etc. • Identify storm sewer overflow locations for storm flows. Reuse the existing system of storm sewer catch basins, manholes and pipes if possible. • Identify permitting requirements for the reconstruction project. • Determine BMP sizing requirements based on RWMWD criteria. • Perform infiltration BMP site sensitivity analysis and determine in concept the locations of stormwater BMPs in the street right - of -way. • Identify utility conflicts. Practice avoidance as a first step to resolving utility conflicts. If necessary, meet with utility entities and discuss if relocation or utility upgrades are necessary, and can be coordinated with the street reconstruction. • Identify how mature trees will be protected during construction and where new street trees will be planted. Step 3 – Design Development — Develop a preliminary design considering constraints, criteria and opportunities identified in Step 1. • Customize the concept street layout to the context and citizen needs of the particular street. For more information regarding specific streetscape elements, refer to the Appendix A: Design Guidelines. • Identify opportunities for public art and for residents to creatively contribute to design features. • Conduct a design meeting with RWMWD: – Discuss the concept street layout and results of the site analysis. – Consider if there are opportunities to add supplemental stormwater BMPs to the design, above the minimums required by the District. These BMPs could be paid for by the District. This meeting and information exchange is not for permitting, but for design development. – Incorporate these additional stormwater BMPs into the preliminary design. • Perform stormwater modeling, if necessary. • Determine the level of maintenance acceptable for the hard features, BMPs and landscape. Determine how this will be funded and who will conduct the maintenance work. Put this into budget plans • Create a preliminary design and construction cost estimate. Step 4 - Conduct Public Meeting • Proceed with public engagement of the neighborhood for resident education and input as described in the Implementation section of this document. • Conduct public meeting for the street reconstruction project • Incorporate stakeholder feedback and contributions as appropriate. Step S - Proceed with Final Design and Construction • Proceed with final detailed design of all project features. • Write a management plan pertaining to "Green" features. • Proceed with the permitting process, including RWMWD permitting. • . Proceed with construction documents, contracting and construction. • Implement management plan. Secdon 3.0 Design Guidelines 6r -o � - a� 1 t r y� A� r 35 Section 3.0 Design Guidelines 36 This section looks at specific ways the city can implement Living Streets. There are two types of implementation programs described below. The first includes items that the city can implement through city staff or through direct involvement of City Council. The second group of items are tasks to be stewarded by engaged citizens. Special Assessments 1 Staff and Council Directed A special assessment is a Implementation Programs charge imposed on real property to help pay for Use Assessment Policy to Communicate the a local improvement that Cost Savings of Living Streets Compared to benefits the property. The state constitution allows the Conventional Streets legislature to authorize local governments to use special As in most cities, North St. Paul uses Special Assessments to help assessments to help pay for finance street reconstruction projects. The street reconstruction local improvements based on and assessment processes the city uses could be enhanced to the benefit the improvement communicate the lower costs for Living Streets compared to a gives the property. MN statutes conventional street project. During this process, residents are authorize cities, towns, keenly aware of the project and what it is going to cost them urban towns, and counties to in special assessments. This heightened level of awareness can make specific improvements, including: streets, sidewalks, be used to communicate that the City's policy of replacing pavement, gutters, curbs, conventional streets with living streets is helping to keep street vehicle parking strips, grading, construction costs, and hence assessments as low as possible. For trees, beautification, and storm example, the narrower streets associated with Living Streets have sewers including holding areas lower construction costs than reconstructing streets to their current and ponds, or other street width because less pavement is put down. drainage and connections from sewer, water or similar mains to In communicating special assessments to residents, the city could curb lines. illustrate the cost difference between conventional streets and living streets. Through this communication, the city can help improve acceptance of Living Streets and communicate city efforts to keep costs as low as possible. 37 Section 4.0 Implementation i Develop and Implement a Living Street Reconstruction Process Converting city streets into Living Streets represents change to the landscape with which city residents and business owners are so familiar. It is important to build awareness of living streets when it comes time for their street to be reconstructed. Involving citizens early in the process promotes civic vitality, fosters ownership and allows room for unique expressions of neighborhood identity. The following public participation implementation and design process is suggested for all Living Street reconstruction projects. November Preliminary design study completed Communications Time Frame Project Step Element' Communications Objectives March Preliminary design and feasibility preliminary street design living street components January -March study begins Construction time frame; issues April City and RWMWD design living street contracting elements and explore funding options Construction starts July Informational letter & brochure Informational Letter Notice open house, mailed to affected residents & reconstruction process, businesses announcing the project on how streets are selected, their street assessments /financing, construction impacts Living Streets What living streets are; Brochure living street benefits Project Website Project updates; launched hosts all communications generated for project Mid- Neighborhood open house Presentation Boards What living streets are; September- living street benefits October November Preliminary design study completed Public meeting held to share Feasibility results Estimated cost, e results of feasibility study and the letter net cost savings, preliminary street design living street components January -March Final design, construction document Construction letter Construction time frame; issues preparation, permitting, bidding, during construction contracting April -May Construction starts October- Construction finishes November Spring Warranty work completed; maintenance plan initiated Summer /Fall Final assessment hearing Final assessment Final proposed assessments; results letter financing options; rainwater garden maintenance tutorial given 'Each element is included in the Appendix or on the web site. 38 Develop an Asset Management Plan The overall purpose of an Asset Management Plan is to both properly maintain the City's infrastructure and to manage related finances in a sustainable manner. It looks into the future and provides direction on the repair and replacement of utilities, sewer and street infrastructure. It is important to plan ahead for the maintenance of new green infrastructure elements in town such as street trees and rainwater gardens. An Asset Management Plan includes an inventory of the infrastructure and evaluates these assets in terms of what and when they will require repairs and /or replacement. It also identifies expansion areas and what new assets are needed to serve expansion or new service capabilities. The Asset Management Plan is a capital budgeting tool and is used for updating the city's capital improvement plan. This report recommends an Asset Management Plan be produced for the infrastructure (including green infrastructure) of North St. Paul. Section 4.0 Implementation It is important to plan ahead for maintenance items, such as pruning street trees. 39 Section 4.0 Implementation Determine /Appropriate and Feasible Municipal Funding Mechanisms for Living Street Elements There are various funding mechanisms for different elements within Living Streets. Funding options are illustrated in the table below. Funding these elements from different sources is a policy decision of the city and the RWMWD. Both parties should discuss these funding options for potential projects and develop a mutually supportive policy to fund and therefore implement Living Streets in the city. X = Existing funding approach 'For sidewalks along state aid roads • = Potential funding approach with broader perspective for goal achievement 'Includes bike facilities: on- street and off -road trail 40 Other Funding Sources (Grant Programs) Living Streets are comprised of many elements (streets, sidewalks, bike facilities, stormwater treatment facilities, landscaping, signage, and art). There are many approaches to funding Living Streets. Some approaches will work for individual elements while other approaches could apply to multiple elements or entire projects. With city resources in tight supply, a creative approach to funding will be needed. A variety of local, state and federal programs are available for funding many of the elements found in Living Streets. A summary of currently known programs, and how they might contribute to funding Living Street projects, is located in Appendix D. Living Street Element Curb to Curb Sidewalks Rain Gardens Street Trees Art Other? Pavement & (including on- street Storm Sewer bike lanes) Funding State Aid Local Roads Streets Source State Aid X X2 Assessments X X O • • Surface Water . X Quality Funds City General X X • Fund RWMWD X • X TMDL Grant • • X • DNRTraiI X X Connect Program' X = Existing funding approach 'For sidewalks along state aid roads • = Potential funding approach with broader perspective for goal achievement 'Includes bike facilities: on- street and off -road trail 40 Other Funding Sources (Grant Programs) Living Streets are comprised of many elements (streets, sidewalks, bike facilities, stormwater treatment facilities, landscaping, signage, and art). There are many approaches to funding Living Streets. Some approaches will work for individual elements while other approaches could apply to multiple elements or entire projects. With city resources in tight supply, a creative approach to funding will be needed. A variety of local, state and federal programs are available for funding many of the elements found in Living Streets. A summary of currently known programs, and how they might contribute to funding Living Street projects, is located in Appendix D. Implementation Items Requiring Citizen Involvement and Participation Create an Advisory Board for Plan Stewardship The success of implementing Living Streets is highly dependent on involving citizens in their implementation. The creation of a citizen advisory board or some other citizen group that meets regularly is recommended to provide oversight and on -going stewardship of these implementation items. A new advisory group could be formed using the Citizen Task Force that oversaw the creation of this Living Streets Plan. Providing stewardship responsibility to the Planning Commission, the Environmental Commission, or a special joint committee of these two existing advisory groups is also an option. Implement a City -Wide Communications Program The awareness and support for the benefits of Living Streets among city residents is also critical to the successful implementation of specific Living Street reconstruction projects. A comprehensive and consistent communications /education campaign is needed to create broad support. A strategy for such a campaign is included in Appendix B. The communications plan includes key action steps and the materials /tools needed to build awareness and community support. It is anticipated that an advisory board and RWMWD staff will share implementation responsibility. Develop a Comprehensive Sidewalk and Bicycle Plan Sidewalks and bike facilities are key elements of Living Streets. They are a critical element in creating a safe community accessible to all. This plan does not indicate exactly where sidewalks or bike lanes should be placed in North St. Paul, but recommends that a separate study be conducted to create a city -wide plan to specify placement of sidewalks and bike facilities. Such a plan should be developed through a community engagement process which is especially important given previous conflicts over sidewalk construction. As part of this planning process, the Citizen Task Force that oversaw the creation of this Living Streets plan developed a preliminary sidewalk and bike plan, found in Appendix C. This preliminary plan is a starting point for a future effort to develop a city -wide sidewalk and bike plan. The preliminary plan developed goals and strategies, and suggests specific locations for facilities based on the local knowledge of the Task Force members. Section 4.0 Implementation Citizen involvement is critical to the success of implementing living Streets. I� This plan includes a preliminary sidewalk and bike plan, found in Appendix C. 41 Section 4.0 Implementation 42 Design guidelines for each street design element have been broken down into four categories: • Design Objective —the primary intent of the element. • Design Standard —the intent is to make this standard practice for street reconstruction work in the City of North Saint Paul public right -of -way. • Design Considerations —the intent is to provide additional alternatives, resources and strategies. Though not required for every project, these strategies may reduce system conflicts, aide system compatibility, add value, promote sustainability and inform the designer. • Construction and Maintenance Considerations —the intent is to provide additional alternatives, resources and strategies to apply to the construction, operation and maintenance of the design element. Design elements must be considered in an integrated approach to maximize streetscape benefits. A -I Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Street Design See the Design Summary Table at the end of this section for a summary of street guidelines. Design Objective • To minimize impervious surface area while providing essential auto transportation services in a safe environment. Reduce pavement impervious area where possible. • Integrate roadway, pedestrian /bike and green infrastructure elements to accomplish multiple functions. • Provide on- street parking in appropriate quantity only where necessary. • Provide driveway and alleyway extensions to connect to narrowed roadways. • Improve the sustainability of paving practices with material recycling practices. • Reduce urban heat island effect by reducing the thermal impact of pavement. • Improve durability to extend the usable life of reconstructed pavement. Design Standard • Evaluate pedestrian, automobile and bicycle traffic needs on a project -by- project basis to determine safety requirements, especially at intersections and on Collector /Arterial streets. Prioritize the needs and safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. • Roadways must be designed for safe intersection turning and passage of emergency vehicles, school buses, occasional garbage collection trucks, delivery trucks, etc. • Design cross slopes and curb profile to move stormwater to vegetated BMPs within the right -of -way. • Perform soil correction where roads are narrowed and green space is created. Loosen or replace compacted soil under the removed roadway section or areas compacted during construction. See Soil Preparation and Soil Amendment Design Guidelines. • Identify where new street trees will be planted and how mature trees will be protected when designing the street layout. • Educate landowners on the street design approach prior to design. Establish a public engagement process. Engage community leaders first. A -2 For Residential (Local) Roads: — A street width of 22 feet is recommended for low traffic local streets (ADT<400). — A single drive lane (also known as a queue lane or yield lane) of 15 foot width is recommended. — Provide on- street parking on one side of the street only, at a width of 7 feet. At each intersection approach, enforce a no- parking zone to provide space for vehicle turning. — Provide for safe intersection turning by utilizing large curb radii and /or slight widening of approaches to intersections. This is particularly important where local streets meet collector /arterial streets. — Additional parking can be provided in the form of 7 or 8 foot wide parking bays near institution locations, businesses or multifamily housing, if necessary. — Provide space to install storm water treatment BMPs in the right- of -way. For Collector /Arterial Roads: — Drive lane width of 10 feet is recommended. On state -aid roadways, 11 feet is the minimum drive lane width by MN Rules. Efforts across Minnesota are underway to make 10 foot wide drive lanes and complete streets possible. Drive lanes of 10 feet width should be pursued, if allowed by law in the future. Alternatively, 10 feet wide drive lanes could be pursued through a state -aid variance process. — Install bicycle lanes. See Bicycle Lanes Design Guidelines for additional information. — Install curb extensions at the ends of blocks, and between parking bays mid - block. See Curbs and Curb Extensions Design Guidelines for additional information. Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines An example of a 22 -foot local street with parking on one side. WL M 22 feet curb to curb Rio.. _4 Narrow streets are snow plowable. Parking bay example. narrow local road to 22' Local roads present opportunities for impervious surface reduction through narrowing. A -3 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Minimum Allowable Posted Speed Limit 30 mph is currently the minimum allowable posted speed limit on local roads by MN Statute 169.14. A speed limit of 25 mph can be posted provided the local road authority erects signs designating the speed limit and indicating the beginning and end of the specific residential roadway segment on which the speed limit applies. Coordination and Per Reconstruction work on state - aid roadways as shown in this plan will require coordination and permitting with Ramsey County and MN /DOT. See the MN /DOT State Aid web site for additional information. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ stateaid /index.html http: / /www.dot.state.m n. us/ stateaid /manual /sam07/ chapterl /1- 7.html Minnesota Complete Streets On May 15, 2010, the governor signed Omnibus Transportation Bill (SF- 2540) which makes Complete Streets policy a statewide priority and is intended to promote context - sensitive street designs on state -aide roadways. A -4 — Dimensional criteria for on- street parking, bicycle lanes and drive lanes should be determined by the context and traffic level of each street segment. For example, wider parking bays may be desirable in front of businesses. — Provide space to install storm water treatment BMPs in the right -of -way. Design Considerations For Collector /Arterial Roads: — Consider on- street parking bay width of 8 feet for streets where ADT <10,000 and 10 feet for streets where ADT > or equal to 10,000 or where frequent use is expected, such as in front of businesses. — The necessity, dimensions and coordination of turn lanes, signalization and signage must be approached on a project -by- project basis. — Consider a maximum speed limit of 30 mph. • Consider using a curbless "rural residential section" where curb currently does not exist. • Reorganizing the right -of -way to accommodate sidewalks, rain gardens and trees may require relocation of existing underground utilities, catch basins, hydrants, valves and sanitary sewer manholes. This reorganization should be addressed on a project -by- project basis. • Consider using decorative pervious pavers at pedestrian drop - off areas and transit stops for a visual indicator of pedestrian activity. • Consider carrying sidewalks through driveways with a visual cue such as a pavement material change to alert drivers and improve safety. • Consider strictly enforcing soils compaction, aggregate specifications, and pavement specifications where roadway sections are replaced due to utility cuts. • Consider encouraging homeowners to eliminate street accessible driveways if an alleyway accessible driveway exists or is proposed on the same property. • If homeowners request additional parking, consider providing a parking space in a widened portion of the driveway as opposed to an on- street parallel - parking bay. A driveway space could (in some cases) be constructed for a lower cost and generate less impervious surface than on on- street parking bay. Such driveways could be a potential location for installing pervious pavers. For example, a disabled resident may require an accessible parking space. • Consider enhancing the sustainability of paving practices by: – Evaluating existing materials and performing selective demolition. Recycle valuable materials such as base aggregate materials and pavement whenever possible. – Specifying recycled materials in pavement sub -base aggregates, such as recycled concrete aggregate or other recycled materials. – Minimizing the use of construction materials that are emitting high levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). – Modifying pavement mixes to achieve a higher albedo, and absorb less solar radiation. – Specifying asphalt mixtures that utilize appropriate amounts of recycled materials in asphalt pavements, such as recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) or other materials. – Specifying Portland cement concrete mixtures that utilize appropriate amounts of recycled materials, such as recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) • Consider utilizing pervious pavements in select locations: – Using pervious pavements and underlying aggregates to infiltrate rainwater where it falls on pedestrian areas, low - traffic roads or parking areas. Give preference to low- traffic locations where pavement will not be frequently dirtied, salted or overly costly to maintain. – When considering pervious pavements for larger applications, compare the increased cost of pervious pavements /pavers and underlying aggregate reservoirs with the cost tradeoff of reduced storm water infrastructure. – Avoid using pervious pavements in areas subject to significant amounts of sedimentation and large amounts of traffic. – Pervious pavements require seasonal maintenance, such as vacuuming or water jet cleaning. Appendix A—Design Element Guidelines Recycling Options For additional information about recycling pavement, waste reduction and construction and demolition (C &D) debris recyc ling see: • Minnesota Asphalt Pavement Association at http: / /www. asphaltisbest.com / • The State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines at www.msdg. umn.edu/ • Asphalt Recycling and Reclamation Association at www.arra.org • Concrete recycling at www. conc reterecycl i ng.org • The Environmental Council of Concrete Organizations (ECCO) at www.ecco.org • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency at http: / /www. pca . state. m n. us/oea/ greenbuilding/waste.cfm • Minnesota Materials Exchange • Twin Cities FreeMarket for recycling construction wastes Pervious pavers installed at the Headwaters on Tryon Creek in Portland, OR. A -5 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines For additional Information regarding Pavement Management, see Chapter 3 of the Metropolitan Council Urban Small Sites Best Management Practice (BMP) Manual. A -6 Construction and Maintenance Considerations • Recycle valuable materials such as bituminous pavement, metals, aggregates and concrete generated during construction. Compost removed vegetation. • Properly sequence construction and drainage to avoid soil compaction, erosion and sedimentation in green space and stormwater treatment areas. • Consider reducing sand and salt application during winter to save money, promote stormwater BMP functionality, lessen pavement degradation and reduce this source of stormwater pollution. • Minimize or eliminate the application of sand and salt in porous pavement areas. • Sweep streets as early as possible in spring, following snowmelt and before rains wash sediment downstream. • Consider sweeping in June, following the drop of tree seeds and flowers. • Sweep sediment generating hot spots, such as near construction sites and aggregate /salt stockpile transfer sites. • Vacuum sweepers are preferable to broom sweepers. • Consider convertible sweeping equipment that can perform cleaning as well as plowing, or other functions. For best practices related to complete street design refer to: • Context Sensitive Solutions in Designing Major Urban Thoroughfares.for Walkable Communities: an ITE Proposed Recommended Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2005. • A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition, AASHTO. 2004. • The National Complete Streets Coalition. www.completestreets.org • Minnesota Department of Transportation: Planning and Design Tools for Construction. Projects. www. dot. state.mn.us /tecsup /design2.htmI Infiltration Basins Design Objective • To harvest street runoff to water street trees. • To provide a place for soil life and plant life to treat storm water. • To achieve water quality treatment and volume reduction goals. • To reduce the rate of stormwater runoff by retaining stormwater in the gardens. Design Standard • Perform a site analysis to determine site suitability for infiltration. • Use information in the RWMWD Kohlman Infiltration Study to help plan infiltration basin locations. • Perform soil boring(s) to confirm on -site soils are suitable for infiltration. Plan locations of infiltration systems where soils allow infiltration. Hydrologic soil groups A & B typically allow for the construction of infiltration basins whereas C & D soils typically require filtration basins. • Obtain detailed site topographic information, including the elevations of low openings for existing habitable adjacent buildings. • Prevent the unwanted migration of stormwater into sensitive areas, such as basements and road gravel base material. A vertical impermeable barrier can help direct water downward and away from a sensitive area as opposed to laterally or toward it. • A desirable length to width ratio for an infiltration basin is 3:1 or greater. • Basin side slopes should be 4H:1 V or flatter. Construct a retaining wall if space is limited. • The depth of ponding in the shallow depression shall not exceed 18 inches. • Stormwater runoff must be pretreated to remove solids before discharging to infiltration basins to maintain their long -term viability. At inlets to basins install easily maintainable sediment pre- treatment devices (forebays, catch basin sumps, grit chambers and turf filter strips are options). Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Infiltration areas promote robust plant growth. www.rwmwd.org Refer to the rules of Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for the design of all stormwater BMPs. Rainwater gardens in boulevards along residential streets A -7 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines For Additional Information For additional information regarding Site Sensitivity Analysis, Soils Investigations, Infiltration Systems and Rainwater Gardens, see Chapter 3 of the Metropolitan Council Urban Small Sites Best Management Practice (BMP) Manual. www,metrocounci I.org\ environment Infiltration BMPs Design and placement of infiltration BMPs shall be done in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health guidance called "Evaluating Proposed Stormwater Infiltration Projects in Vulnerable Wellhead Protection Areas." A -8 • Design the basin to safely overflow and be bypassed by flood flows. Do not create flow- through rainwater gardens. • Install a minimum of 12 inches percolation - friendly planting soil. • Plant perennials and shrubs rather than turf grass. • Place edging around rainwater gardens. Design Considerations • Plants in the gardens should be selected to allow for low maintenance. • Consider using shredded hardwood mulch around plantings. • Consider installing retaining walls on the side opposite the street edge to maximize storage volume or accommodate a smaller footprint. Construction and Maintenance Considerations • Prevent rainwater garden soil compaction during construction. Do not allow construction equipment into basins during or after their construction. • Properly sequence construction work to avoid rainwater garden inundation and sedimentation prior to plant establishment. • Divert stormwater, especially large flows, around basin during vegetation establishment period. • Apply shredded hardwood mulch to the surface of rainwater gardens as necessary (typically every second year). Decaying mulch will add to the fertility of the soil. • Bring basin on -line once vegetation is established and not before upstream portions of the site are stabilized. • Sediment pre- treatment devices (forebays, catch basin sumps, grit chambers and filter strips) will require periodic sediment removal to maintain filtering ability. Clean them at least annually, and more often as necessary. • Basins will require weeding at least monthly during the first 2 years of establishment. • Maintenance after establishment period will include cutting back standing herbaceous material in the spring along with weeding and mulching. After that walk through the garden about every six weeks and pull weeds. Appendix A—Design Element Guidelines Infiltration basins may require soil corrections, such as the sand trench shown above, to promote infiltration into subsoils. Some infiltration basins may be constructed in percolation- friendly soils without the need for a sand trench or other soil corrections, as shown above. A -9 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Filtration Basins Design Objective • Filtration basins are used when soils do not allow for stormwater infiltration. • To provide a place for soil life and plant life to treat stormwater. • To achieve water quality treatment goals by filtering stormwater rather than infiltrating stormwater as accomplished by infiltration basins. • To reduce the rate of stormwater runoff by retaining stormwater in the gardens. Design Standard • Filtration basins are similar to infiltration basins, but are constructed with an underdrain which flows to the storm sewer system or daylights to grade. • See Infiltration Basins Design Guidelines for all other standards. i Design Considerations • See Infiltration Basins Design Guidelines for considerations. Construction and Maintenance Considerations • See Infiltration Basins Design Guidelines for considerations. A filtration basin collects stormwater in an underdrain system for discharge downstream. A -10 Soil Preparation and Soil Amendments Design Objective • Create rainwater garden soil environments teaming with microorganisms and plant roots to treat stormwater. • Create permeable top soils and sub -soils that readily infiltrate stormwater, and allow plant roots to extend deep into the soil. • Create fertile, loose soils along road sides that support robust trees, shrubs and perennials. a 1:2 35% q' W'Mce W. detasnrdRnh M GroundiMaiEs - awroct Image courtesy of Soils for Salmon: www soilsforsalmon. org Design Standard • Loosen sub -soils at the bottom of rainwater gardens to a minimum depth of 18" before planting soils are placed. Do this from the side of the basin with a backhoe, or equivalent. • Place 12" of percolation - friendly planting soil within rainwater gardens. • Where possible amend existing topsoils with locally available, sustainably produced amendments, such as organic compost to produce planting soils. • Avoid the use of synthetic fertilizers. Instead, compost planting areas. • Soils along roadsides should be loosened to a minimum depth of 24" after road construction is complete, and a minimum of 6" of topsoil should be placed in order to allow stormwater infiltration and to allow for the healthy growth of trees. Appendix A—Design Element Guidelines 11111116�_ --�! A -11 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Keep mechanical equipment off loosened soils to prevent recompaction. Design Considerations • Consider sourcing compost locally whenever possible. Construction and Maintenance Considerations During construction do not allow mechanical equipment into rainwater gardens. All work should be done from the side to avoid soil compaction. Apply shredded hardwood mulch to the surface of rainwater gardens as necessary. (typically every second year). Decaying mulch will add to the fertility of the soil. • Compost dead or cut vegetation. A -12 Plantings and Street Trees Design Objective • Shade pavement during summer months to reduce ambient air temperatures, increase comfort and reduce urban heat island effect. • Design easy to maintain yet beautiful rainwater garden plantings. • Create a unified feel between rainwater gardens along a given street. • Plant street trees to create a canopy over the street. Design Standard • Plant a diversity of street trees to avoid complete die -out from rampant disease. • Street tree species should be selected to avoid those that tend to heave pavement or penetrate utility pipes. Avoid using species like elm, birch and poplars. Plant species such as oaks, Kentucky coffee tree, honey locust and basswood. • Avoid planting trees where they will interfere with driver sight lines and adequate street lighting. • Design simple rainwater garden plantings that are easy to maintain. Consider the ability and time constraints of property owners that will maintain rainwater gardens. Most gardens should be planted with just a few species of robust horticultural perennials and low growing shrubs to keep maintenance low. • Native herbaceous plants are difficult to manage to a neat and tidy appearance. They should be considered high maintenance gardens. Native herbaceous plants should only be planted for individuals that fully understand their maintenance requirements. • Repeat a few of the boldest species in every garden in a neighborhood. This will provide visual unity and tie the neighborhood together in a pleasing appearance. • Install edging around rainwater gardens to keep lawn from moving into the garden and therefore reducing maintenance. • In the bidding documents, request experience qualifications from contractors, in particular landscaping contractors. • Protect existing vegetation during construction. Avoid soil compaction over roots during construction. Appendix A—Design Element Guidelines lip, I 7111 Ir ' A -13 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines it 5_ _ t A -14 i. • Plant and seed following proper soil preparation work. See Soil Preparation and Soil Amendment Guidelines. Design Considerations • Consider using a dominance of ornamental grasses such as Feather Reed Grass "Karl Foerster" or selections of Switchgass such as "Heavy Metal" in rainwater gardens. They are deep rooted, form a good weed barrier, look great, and are simple to maintain. Construction and Maintenance Considerations • Replant vegetated areas as necessary. • Street trees must be planted as per MN /DOT's standard planting details. Soils must be properly prepared as described above. • Street trees should be pruned regularly; especially during the first five years after planting. This will extend the life of the trees. • Cut back herbaceous plants in rainwater gardens each spring. At this time also weed and refresh shredded hardwood mulch. Rainwater gardens should be weeded regularly. Weeding frequency may be reduced to three or four times per growing season with proper mulching. Rainwater garden at Swede Hollow Cafe in St. Paul. Curbs and Curb Extensions Design Objective • Narrow streets widths and reduce impervious surfaces using curb extensions. • Curb extensions provide space for stormwater treatment facilities and reduce pedestrian crossing distance. Design Standard • Consider a curbless road section on residential streets that do not have curbs. • Concrete curb and gutter should be given preference over bituminous curb. • Design roadway cross slopes and curb profile to move stormwater first to pretreatment areas, then vegetated BMPs in the right -of -way. Allow excess storm flows to safely overflow down the gutter line to the storm sewer without unacceptable roadway inundation. Size overflow structures accordingly. • Provide catch basin drop inlet structures as inlets to rainwater garden pretreatment where appropriate. • Curb cut inlets (curbless sections) should have a minimum bottom opening length of 4 feet (not including tapers). Provide a minimum 4" drop from gutter elevation into the edge of the pretreatment facility. Protect this drop area from erosion with appropriate material, such as splash blocks or a concrete transition. • For street edges along bike lanes, choose catch basin inlet grates that are not hazards to bicyclists • Where a curb extension is installed, the extension shall be offset from the incoming curb line a minimum of 4 feet to aide visibility to oncoming drivers and snow plows. A minimum transition length of 12 feet shall be used for transitions from straight curb lines. The minimum back -of -curb radius for the transition shall be 10 feet. Other transition lengths and shapes can be configured on a project -by- project basis. • Design curb extensions to best accommodate snow plowing. Avoid blunt edges and sharp corners. Consider using gradual curves for the transitions. Consider modified curb designs to reduce snowplow blade impacts. Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines An example of a curb cut inlet. Curb extensions can be used to reduce pedestrian crossing distance. A -15 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Design Considerations • Consider marking curb extension transitions with visual cues for traffic and snow plows, such as vegetation changes or other design elements. • Design curb inlet to prevent flow -by. Depress the curb inlet slightly. Take measures to prevent the creation of hazards for bicyclists. • Consider mountable and vertical curb designs for flexibility. Construction and Maintenance Considerations • Snow plowing patterns will need to be modified to account for curb extensions. Curb extensions are an integral part of organizing intersections for the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, and to provide space for stormwater treatment. A -16 Sidewalks and Crosswalks Design Objective • To encourage walking. • To provide safe walking outside of the roadway. • To organize intersections for safe use by all users. Design Standard • Sidewalks shall be a minimum width of 4 feet. This is intended to accommodate walkers and reduce cost while avoiding the over - creation of impervious surfaces. • The costs of sidewalks should be shared project -wide and not allocated to individual homeowners. • Sidewalks on one side of the street on single family residential streets are recommended. Institutions may require sidewalk on both sides. • Sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, ramp slopes, walkways and surfacing should be ADA- compliant and in accordance with statute. • Avoid obstructions to pedestrian areas. • Top of sidewalk elevation must be set above rainwater garden inlet and outlet elevations. • Utilize curb extensions to slow traffic and shorten pedestrian crossing distance at intersections and crossings. See Curb and Curb Extensions design guidelines. • Plant appropriate tree species that will not heave sidewalks. See Plantings and Street Trees design guidelines. • Coordinate pedestrian ramp locations with stormwater management facilities to avoid conflicts and unacceptable inundation of walking areas and waiting areas. • Intersections must function safely for bicyclists, pedestrians and drivers. Safety should be the design priority. • Use recycled materials where possible, such as in aggregates, pavement materials, bridge materials, wall materials, etc. Appendix A—Design Element Guidelines i' A -17 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Lighting Considerations Install adequate lighting in the streetscape. Lighting should be addressed on a project by project basis. For additional information refer to: • MN /DOT Roadway Lighting Design Manual (2003) • Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Lighting Handbook, Recommended Practice for Roadway Lighting (RP- 8-00) and Recommended Design Considerations • Signalization must be considered on a project -by- project basis to enhance safety at higher- traffic intersections. • Place sidewalks a minimum of 6 feet from the curb, unless it is a drop- off /pick up location. • Consider enhancing higher- traffic pedestrian nodes (such as drop -offs, transit stops, and waiting areas) with decorative pervious pavers, trash receptacles, seating and enhanced landscaping. Provide tree shade at these locations. • Where possible, use pedestrian waiting locations at pedestrian nodes as opportunities to showcase green infrastructure by contrasting places of human activity with natural green space, especially stormwater- treatment areas. • Consider installing miniature pedestrian bridges over rainwater gardens and swales to enhance streetscape aesthetics and allow for a continuous storm water treatment area beneath the bridge. Practice: Lighting for Exterior Consider placing artistic way finding signage, artistic Environments (RP- 33 -99). neighborhood identifiers or public art at pedestrian nodes and along key routes. Source imagery for this kind of creative product locally whenever possible within the North Saint Paul arts community and, if at all possible, by the citizens actually living on that street. Take advantage of intersections and pedestrian routes as gateways to neighborhoods and individual streets. Consider placing decorative neighborhood identifiers, retaining walls or public art at intersections. Construction and Maintenance Considerations Temporary offsetting of roadway centerlines may occur as individual streets are narrowed, and perhaps shifted within the right -of -way. Consistency and predictability of the streetscape will increase as more streets are reconstructed in the spirit of this plan. • Construct sidewalks before excavating rainwater gardens. A -18 Bicycle Lanes Design Objective • To encourage bicycling as an alternative to automobile driving. • To provide safe bicycling routes for people of all abilities throughout North Saint Paul. • To reduce the number of cars on the road, lessening dependence on street parking, and reducing impervious surfaces. Design Standard • Create bike lanes 5 feet wide where ADT<5,000 and 6 feet wide where ADT >5,000 on 2 -lane Collector /Arterial streets, per the MN /DOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual. • Design intersections for the safe waiting, turning and movement of bicycles, especially in higher- traffic areas. Address this priority prior to addressing automobile needs. • Accommodate bicycles at intersections, particularly in high - traffic areas. Provide pavement markings and signage to alert drivers to their presence. • Install appropriate signage, signalization and pavement markings. • For street edges along bike lanes, select storm water grates that prevent bike tires from becoming trapped. Appendix A—Design Element Guidelines Sources of Additional Information Source website Minnesota DOT Bicycle and Pedestrian http : / /www.dot.state.mn.us/bike/ Complete the Streets Walk and Bike for Life The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center State Bicycle Advisory Committee Share the Road Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003. Federal Highway Administration. www.completestreets.org www.wa I ka n db i keforl ife.com www.pedbikeinfo.org www.mnsbac.org www.sharetheroadmn.org A -19 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Coordination and Permitting Reconstruction work on state- aid roadways as shown in this plan, including adding bicycle lanes, will require coordination and permitting with Ramsey County and MN /DOT. Under current practices, narrowed drive lanes and bicycle lanes on any county or state aid road would require an Administrative Variance. See the website for MN /DOT State Aid for additional information. Future implementation of the MN Complete Streets policy may provide other methods to accomplish this. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ stateaid /index.html http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ stateaid /manual /sa m 0 7/ chapter] /] - 7.html Additional Design Information For additional design information see the Mn/ DOT Bikeways Facility Design Manual. Find this and other resources at the Mn /DOT Designing for Bicycles and Pedestrians website: http://www. dot.state.mn.us/bike/ bikewaysdesign.html A -20 Design Considerations • For safety, consider narrowing automobile lanes and lowering posted speeds to accommodate on- street bicycle lanes, where feasible. See Street Design Guidelines for additional information. • Consider installing vegetated soil reinforcement pavers at bicycle storage rack locations to infiltrate stormwater. • Install bicycle storage racks in the right -of -way near businesses and institutions. • Ensure bicycle storage rack areas are well -lit for safety. Construction and Maintenance Considerations • Bicycle markings, signage, and signalization require periodic maintenance and adjustment CA*W A: 0~ eAawp » EXISTING 6bm(7]RI - ICI - �- w2eG1s 42M 2.4 m (1AR) @M V.0 pro C4k%lne PROPOSED m _ -[ Design Requirements t � 3Am - 'Sm ttm Parking Stripe (10 RI (S 11) (7 R) Pavement me-ke7lne trr+.� uv eke laic peby Ire 10C mr'r (A In) wide SC = M'M'E Bike lane stripe Pavenerd ma kna line 10C mm (A in) wde sold wMe Bib Lair Symbol i Arrow Ps3A piasbt or veld pa"cWt mark.'gs 1.8 m 16 R) 11 in (I to p�� +. \ I v 11mNro = 1.8 m (e,1) a f— - kR3-17 I:elat SR3.17 sigm ■d Not to Sale " Piris,re,n Srd)a s at pintwt mlenak+b9 Ta b" we Note: C&etk yrent Lt4 rdt1C -D for Rn, &WOes L <,Tn. a}1 Figure 41& Constrained R.O.W. with Parking Case B 122-Foot Rightol-Mbyl us" 7007 VANY a- I Fladiiir Oetps MV W An example of a design aide from the Mn /DOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual. Public Art Design Objective • Use street reconstruction projects as opportunities to improve neighborhood aesthetics and express local identity. • Accomplish watershed -wide community art initiatives. Design Standard • Integrate public art into public -realm infrastructure when appropriate. Public art in infrastructure can be creatively designed site elements, individual art pieces, experiences or any other product of creativity of the residents, designers and artists involved in the project. Public art consists of: — Work resulting from or including artists or artful designers on professional design teams — Physical works of art, including site - specific objects that beautify the public realm and express the creativity and identity of the community — Experiential works of art, including site - specific activities and experiences of various forms and media • Identify and discuss opportunities during the street design process to incorporate public art. Public art should be included in the initial stages of design and included in the processes of public engagement early in the design process. Design Considerations • Consider art as an opportunity to celebrate unique neighborhood identities by encouraging an eclectic mix of aesthetic styles. • Consider collaborative city partnerships with community groups, nonprofit arts organizations and educational institutions to identify opportunities for art to be integrated into reconstruction projects. • Consider showcasing natural resources by developing public art that make stormwater treatment facilities and natural systems educational and interesting. Construction and Maintenance Considerations • Request contractor qualifications when issuing a project for bid that incorporates public art or artful design. • Designate an entity to perform public art maintenance. • Consider city insurance policies in selecting public art. Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines Public art should beautify the public realm and express the creativity and identity of the community. Public art can include individual art pieces. An example of artful stormwater design from the South Waterfront in Portland, OR. 0 U c m a A -21 Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines A -22 Utilities Design Objective • Coordinate the locations of water supply pipes, sanitary sewer pipes, shallow buried utilities and other utilities with the reorganization of other "Green" right -of -way elements to avoid conflicts. • Minimize costs associated with construction. • Improve utility location and coordination for less intrusive access, maintenance and replacement. • Reduce the cost, inconvenience and degradation caused by utility cuts in roadways. Design Standard • Identify locations of all underground utilities when planning stormwater BMP locations. Discuss with utility entities any necessary upgrades to buried utilities. • Practice avoidance as a first alternative to expensive relocation. Protect in -place utilities that are in good condition, and design work to accommodate them whenever possible. • Consider grouping shallow buried utilities in a narrowed corridor along one side of single- family residential streets. When utilities are located, every effort will be made to consolidate in a combined utility trench. • Avoid placing sanitary manholes within storm water basins or where vegetation obstructs access. Ensure manholes are accessible. • Where possible, install sanitary manhole covers above inundation levels. Where inundation appears likely, install bolted watertight castings to inhibit inflow. • Avoid placing water service valves, curb stops, isolation valves or fire hydrants within stormwater basins or where vegetation obstructs access. • Avoid placing street light poles within stormwater basins. • Avoid placing shallow buried utilities beneath stormwater basins or tree plantings whenever possible. • Avoid placing utility vaults where they could be flooded by stormwater management facilities. Appendix A— Design Element Guidelines • Strictly enforce soils compaction, aggregate specifications, and pavement specifications where roadway sections are replaced due to utility cuts. Design Considerations • Consider minimum cover requirements over all underground utilities when planning stormwater basin grading. • Consider techniques to prevent water service pipe freezing, such as insulation, to better locate bioretention facilities within the right -of -way. • Consider the use of impermeable liners to protect utilities where infiltration is proposed. A vertical impermeable barrier can help direct water downward and away from a utility as opposed to laterally or toward it. • Avoid significant grading where shallow buried utilities are present, such as gas service (particularly laterals), fiber optic, etc. whenever possible. Work with utility- owning entities to relocate utilities if necessary. • Consider in -place replacement or rehabilitation of pipes and manholes. • Certain projects may warrant the use of a utility duct to group and contain important buried utilities. This method is attractive if frequent maintenance to the utility is necessary or space is limited. Construction and Maintenance Considerations • Wherever possible, practice avoidance as an alternative to expensive removal and replacement of stormwater facilities when utility maintenance is required. • Establish a common practice for how the city is compensated by utility companies for the unexpected repair of stormwater facilities and landscaping damaged during unexpected utility cut activities. A -23 Appendix A— Design ElemenE Guidelines For best practices related to pedestrian design and accessibility refer to: • Context Sensitive Solutions in Designing Major Urban Thoroughfares for Walkable Communities: an ITE Proposed Recommended Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2005. • Accessible Public Rights of Way. Planning and Designing for Alterations. Institute for Transportation Engineers. 2007. • Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access. Federal Highway Administration. 2001. • Accessible Public Rights of Way. United States Access Board. 2007. http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/index.htm • Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition, AASHTO. 2004. • Guide for the Planning, Design and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities. AASHTO. 2004. • Wayfinding at Intersections. ITE Journal. April, 2005. • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA. 2003. A -24 Goal Implement Living Street reconstruction projects consistent with the design guidelines of this plan. Objectives • Achieve broad community awareness and support of Living Streets and their benefits • Achieve active and visible support of Living Streets among target audiences Action Items Create key messages. Build broad community awareness and support for Living Streets by using key messages (and slogans) and images in all communication programs (e.g., posters, mailers, websites). The key messages will emphasize that Living Streets will encourage physical movement and health, that every neighborhood will benefit, and that Living Streets will connect neighborhoods to each other and create and a distinct image for the city. • This message will be delivered through the Living Street image below. B-1 Appendix B— Living Streets Communications Plan 2. Direct communications and outreach efforts should be directed to the target audiences listed below. Messages in these outreach efforts should specifically highlight the identified benefits of living streets for each audience. Communications and Outreach Efforts Target Audience Key Benefits and Messages Parents 9 Children can walk and bike safely • Healthy children from greater exercise • More time for self because children are more independent and can get themselves to school and other places through safe walking and bike routes • More opportunities for kids to meet other kids and make friends • Parents won't have to watch their children every second because of increased safety • Parents worry less • Sidewalks are social spaces • Sidewalks/bike paths make it easier to meet other families Children (age 6 – 20) 0 Feelings of greater independence and teachers 0 Excitement of outdoor activities with friends • Walk and bide safely to school, home and to parks or downtown • City streets can provide creative expression for a community by featuring public art and unique character that develop neighborhood pride • Streets can be more environmentally friendly and help protect our water • Trees and rain garden plants are important tools in helping keep our water clean • We all live downstream —as a community we can work together to help protect and improve our water, and the animals and plants that live in our environment • We can work together to create safe and healthy streets • Schools can be role models for helping "stop water where it drops." Seniors 0 Greater mobility and health due to safe places to walk and bike (it's easier not. to drive) • Freedom to be mobile in different ways • More opportunities to be present in neighborhood and meet neighbors • Plenty of people want to buy your house because your community has invested in what people value • Getting around takes less time and is easier Bicyclists 0 Greater comfort and safety • Easier access to regional trail systems Business owners 0 Increased sales due to greater access by (Downtown especially) surrounding population Gardeners /Master Naturalists 0 1 can make a difference in my neighborhood • Enhanced community beauty • Opportunity to communicate environmental benefits of vegetation and water infiltration • Front yard gardens are social spaces General community at -large 0 Make North St. Paul the first choice for young families looking for homes • We save money later if we do this today • Houses sell more easily in North St. Paul because of Living Streets • Enhanced community beauty • Attractive identity for the city • Overall enhanced property values – realized at time of sale B -2 Appendix B— Living Streets Communications Plan 3. Build coalitions with, and get endorsements from supportive organizations. Examples include: a. The 16 neighborhood watch groups b. Law enforcement agencies c. Civic groups (Lions, Rotary, KCs, VFW) d. Downtown Business Assoc. e. PTA f. Arts Council g. Health Partners h. Blue Cross Blue Shield i. Principal and teachers at city schools j. Beam Avenue residents k. Active Living Ramsey County I. Seniors at Southwood Nature Preserve m. North St. Paul Master Naturalists n. District 622 School Staff (principals and grounds staff) o. North St. Paul Greens 4. Build awareness and understanding of Living Streets: a. at special events: i. "Night our block/house parties ii. School open houses iii. Car show iv. Highway 36 planting initiative b. Through existing communications i. City utility bill newsletter and quarterly brochure ii. NSPtoday.org iii. City website c. Other opportunities: i. Community center bulletin boards ii. Patches on kid's backpacks iii. Kids' contest to create complete green streets images 5. Use the Living Streets Fact Sheet to communicate the basic information about living streets and their benefits. 6. Use the Living Street Construction Process Fact Sheet to communicate the street design and assessment process the city uses for managing each street construction project. B -3 Appendix I— Living Streets Communications Plan The fact sheets are included as part of this plan on the following pages. s -a • l�/hat �s a anng Street? 1 . r North St. Paul is using the term "Living Streets" to describe a new type of street that will eventually replace most of the city's existing streets. Living streets are narrower and have less pavement than existing streets. Reducing the width of existing streets reduces construction costs and assessments to residents. it allows room for the installation of rainwater gardens to treat stormwater. Where there is a need, bike trails and sidewalks may be installed. Smaller streets also ?` means more room for trees. ' Unlike existing streets that are only designed for cars, liv- ing streets are designed for cars as well as people and the environment. Rainwater gardens and street trees remove I pollutants from stormwater before the water enters area lakes, helping to improve lake quality. Narrower streets and street trees also slow traffic, creating a safe environment for everyone. Bike trails and sidewalks make it easy for all residents to exercise and connect with neighbors. (Uhat coo �.iving Streets look l Living streets will vary depending on the street function and location in the city. The Living Streets Plan includes design templates for three different types of streets (see residential concept at right) and concepts for busier collector streets. Concrete Curb) and Gutter Existing Street Edge 61"" Right Of Way Retaining wail a .� Residential design concept .'J y Street Trees ;4ry qCT Sidewalk Rainwater Garden • 7!IIP_ubIIc Art Component Living Streets are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the street. Elements of a Living Street may include: • sidewalks on one side • bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders) • parking • marked street crossings • pedestrian signals • comfortable and accessible transit stops • rainwater gardens • trees • vegetation Existing residential street layout Proposed residential street layout 4 Iz- Nhat are the BeneOs of aging Streets? • Living Streets have economic benefits because they: — Cost less to build — Reduce long -term maintenance costs — Increase property values — Spark economic revitalization • Living Streets build community because they: — Increase safety by incorporating traffic - calming and speed- reducing elements — Help children by providing room for safe walking and biking — Improve public health by encouraging a healthy life -style for people of all ages — Enhance neighborhood beauty and strengthen a sense of community • Living Streets improve environmental quality because they: — Improve water quality of lakes and streams with addition of rainwater gardens — Improve air quality by providing the means to reduce CO2 emissions and other pollutants — Reduce summer heat generated by streets by using less asphalt and more street trees — Reduce raw material and energy used in street construction by building smaller street surfaces ohen will mf ,street become a Lining Street? ano rarer srorrnwarer runorr, wnrcn then either soaks into the ground or is filtered before snaking its way to the storin sewer pipe. The gardens are filled with plants that thrive in both wet and dry conditions, providing summer -long beauty. Living streets will be installed during water main and sewer replacement and street reconstruction. The need and timing for this work depends on many factors including the age and condition of water mains and streets. The city will mail you a notice approximately one year before construction work is to begin. Ohat dill L Lang Streets cos0, Construction of a Living Street will cost less than reconstructing your existing street. Because Living Streets are narrower and contain less pavement, construction and lifetime maintenance costs are lower than conventional streets. The ability to manage costs is one of the reasons the city is implementing living streets. {how can I learn more? The Living Streets plan was developed under the direction of a City Council appointed citizen task force. The plan is available at the City's web site at www.ci.north- saint- paul.mn.us. .I -� l� � r� �oc� are sir -eets selected f'or reconstruction to Lly- ng Streets? .:' Priority is given to streets or groupings of streets with the / highest need. Streets are prioritized based on the pavement condition and water main, storm sewer and sanitary sewer deficiencies. Streets are reconstructed when the 1 street and/or water main, storm sewer and sanitary sewer have deteriorated to the degree that maintenance and ' rehabilitation activities are no longer effective. CUhat �s street reconstruction? Street reconstruction involves removing and replacing all asphalt, concrete and aggregate base on a roadway segment. A street reconstruction project may also include removing and replacing or constructing new curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. It may also include traffic control improvements, adding streetlights, and drainage improvements. Water and sewer improvements may be completed in conjunction with a street reconstruction project, although they are not integral to the roadway. Streets, such as this one, present the greatest opportunity to create new landscape space for stomnvater treatment and trees, and sidewalks for pedestrians. GJhat happens a�er the streets are selecteci? Infrastructure improvements, including streets and utilities, are approved by the Council in the 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Each year, a specific dollar amount is approved for these improvements. Under the authority granted by Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429, staff begins the process of determining the feasibility of each project. .4 Glhat is the tgpical process {'or reconsErucEion? The typical process from start to finish is one to two years. MARCH The City begins a preliminary design and feasibility study. This includes an evaluation of the street and utility infrastructure, street lighting, and bike and pedestrian accessibility. JULY Information on the project is mailed to affected residents and businesses, including an announcement of a neighborhood open house. Information includes the estimated special assessment to the property owners, information on Living Streets, and estimated dates for public hearings. ME MID -SEPT A neighborhood information meeting is held to discuss neighborhood concerns and design issues. This information is used to complete the preliminary design and feasibility study. NOVEMBER The City completes the preliminary design and feasibility study. A public hearing is held before the City Council to discuss the design and feasibility study. This will include information on estimated project costs and preliminary special assessments for property owners. Affected residents and businesses are notified per state law. Residents can speak publicly regarding the project. The Council will decide if the project is warranted. If the Council orders the project: JAN -MARCH Final design is completed, construction documents are drafted, project is advertised, bids are accepted, and the Council awards the project. APRIL -MAY Construction begins. OCT-NOV Construction ends. SPRING Warranty work is completed. SUMMER /FALL Final assessment hearing is held before the Council after project completion and final costs are known. oho �unk the projecfr? The project is paid for by special assessment to individual properties. Special assessments are based on the concept that when land is benefited from a particular improvement, a portion of the costs of the improvement should be levied against those properties to finance such improvements. Property taxes do not pay for street reconstruction. Utility work (water, sewer, stormwater) is typically paid out of the respective utility fund. For more information, visit the City's web site at www.ci.north- saint - paul.mn.us. Plan Goals Early in the Living Streets planning process, the Citizen Task Force developed a preliminary city -wide bicycle and sidewalk Plan. This draft plan is intended to be a starting point for a larger comprehensive effort to develop a city -wide bicycle and sidewalk plan. Prior to mapping potential locations for bike facilities and sidewalks, the Task Force identified goals for new bike facilities and sidewalks: • Develop safe and convenient links to schools, commercial hubs, employment centers, institutions, and transit facilities. • Develop recreational pathways that link neighborhoods to parks and natural areas, especially the Gateway trail. The plan shown in the following map is a compilation of "mapped" ideas from all Task Force members. The plan was created based on member's knowledge of local conditions. Specific mapping of bike facilities and sidewalk locations were intended to: • Improve safety on busy streets • Fill gaps in existing sidewalks • Provide safe routes to schools and major destinations • Connect neighborhoods to parks and natural areas • Separate pedestrians from areas of high bicycle activity The Task Force recognized that sidewalks are not needed on both sides of every street. The Task Force worked with the idea of developing a "right size" network that prioritizes needs. C-1 Appendix D —Grant Funding Sources Grant Funding Sources Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Eligible Assistance Agency Program Name & Description Organizations Available Deadlines Contact Funded by Safe Routes to Schools Schools (public Funded at SAFETEA -LU Mark Fiers: USDOT Funds cover two elements: & private), 100% of is up for re- mark.fiers@state. (SAFETEA -LU) Parent/teacher cost. No authorization mn.us Administered 1. Infrastructure organizations, local match by Congress. by MNDOT Tribes, Local required. or Street crossing safety governments, $25,000 Kristie Billiar: improvements, spot Non- Profits, - $175,000 (651) 366 -3174 improvements in existing Metropolitan for infrastruc- pedestrian /bike ways, Planning ture. creating new pedestrian/ Organizations, bike ways, traffic calming, Regional signing, bicycle parking, development lighting. Commissions, 2. Non Infrastructure Other educational Crosswalk guard training, organizations. enforcement, public awareness campaigns, walk/bike to school days public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders, traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment. Project may include Engineering costs, and must include (either, directly or indirectly) Education, Enforcement, Encouragement, and evaluation program elements. continued on the next page D -I Appendix D —Grant Funding Sources Grant Funding Sources Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Eligible Assistance Agency Program Name & Description Organizations Available Deadlines Contact Metropolitan Livable Communities Application is No minimum Applications Mary Baker Council Account Grant Program open to cities or maximum due August 651 - 296 -6300 The Livable Communities participating in award levels 24, 2009. Demonstration Account the Metropolitan established. or (LCDA) funds development Livable Commu- nities Hous- Unclear if funding 1 -800- 657 -3864 and redevelopment projects iv ing Incentives match is mary.baker @state. that achieve connected Program, Program, , required. mn.us development patterns pro - linking housing, jobs and behalf in their services, and maximize the development potential of communities; metropolitan - existing infrastructure and regional facilities. area counties or development authorities (e.g., housing and development authorities, eco- nomic develop- ment authorities, port authorities) on behalf of projects located in LCA partici- pant communi- ties. Bike Trails MNDNR Local Trail Connections Cities, counties, 50% match- Applications Andrew Korsberg, Program and townships ing funds due annually Trail Program Land acquisition and trail required. Grant awards on March 31. Minnesota DNR, development program to Trails and Water - promote relatively short trail may range between ways connections between where $5,000 and (651) 259 -5642 people live and desirable $100,000. locations and regional trails an drew.korsberg@ (e.g. Gateway). dnr.state.mn.us MDNR Regional Trail Grant Program Cities, counties, 50% match- Applications Andrew Korsberg, Program to promote and townships. ing funds due annually Trail Program development of regionally required. on March 31 Minnesota DNR, significant trails. Primary Maximum grant award Trails and Water determinants of significance is $250,000. ways include length, expected use, and resource quality/ (651) 259 -5642 attractiveness. andrew.korsberg@ dnr.state.rnn.us D -2 Appendix D —Grant Funding Sources Grant Funding Sources Bike Trails Eligible Assistance Agency Program Name & Description Organizations Available Deadlines Contact MDNR Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Eligible proj- The mini- Applica- See website: Program ects include mum grant tions due by http: / /www.dnr. To provide grants to local acquisition , development, request is $20,000, March 31, 2010 state.mn.us /grants/ units of government to restoration, and and the recreation/pt_lega- support parks and trails maintenance of maximum cy.html of regional or statewide Park and trail grant award significance. Funding for this facilities that is $500,000. grant program is from the are considered 25% match Parks and Trails Fund created of regional is required. by the Minnesota Legislature or statewide from the Clean Water, Land significance. Eli - and Legacy Amendment gable applicants passed by the voters in 2008. include counties, cities, townships, and legisla- tively designated regional parks and trails taxing authorities. Stormwater Treatment MPCA Environmental Assistance Eligible Maximum Applica- Mary Baker Grant Program applicants will grant award tions due by Program for development of vary per focus is $75,000 or November 651- 296 -6300 environmentally sustainable area (see RFP 75% of the 3, 2009 by or practices through voluntary on website). Stormwater total cost, whichever 3 pm 1 -800- 657 -3864 partnerships and goal -ori- ented, economically- driven applicants is less. 25% mary.baker @state. approaches to pollution pre- limited to MN match- mn.us vention and resource conser- local units of ing funds vation. Focus areas include: government. required. Waste prevention and reduc- tion: implementing efficient and economically sound practices to prevent and re- duce waste at the source Source - separated compost- ing: reducing the amount of organic wastes entering disposal facilities Stormwater Sources: prevent- ing impairment or degrada- tion of state waters from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System /State l Disposal System (NPDES /SDS) permitted stormwater sources. See website for specific types of stormwater projects being accepted. j I D -3 Appendix D —Grant Funding Sources D -4 Bike & Pedestrian System EXISTING FOOTPATH EXISTING SIDEWALK • PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED SIDEWALK -2 EXISTING BIKELANE • PROPOSED BIKELANE EXISTING TRAIL PROPOSED TRAIL acs% PROPOSED PARKWAY Green Space Kohlman Creek Subwatershed Surface Water Green Infrastructure Project • Community Facilities City of North Saint Paul , MN and Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District O 0 450 900 1,800 Feet Draft Bicycle and Sidewalk Plan Appendix C ST PAI 11. Ramsey -Washington Metro HAHTR CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 Prepared by: Department of Finance John Wallin — Treasurer and Finance Director Eric Roggeman — Assistant Finance Director Kyle Sawyer — Accountant CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal GFOA Certificate of Achievement Organization 'Organization Chart II. FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors' Report Management's Discussion and Analysis Basic Financial Statements: Government -wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Assets Statement of Activities Fund Financial Statements: Page No. 1 4 5 6 7 17 21 22 Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 25 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 26 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 27 Statement of Net Assets - Proprietary Funds 28 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets - Proprietary Funds 29 Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 30 Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets - Fiduciary Funds 32 Notes to the Financial Statements 33- Required Supplementary Information: Budgetary Comparison Information: Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund 65 Budgetary Comparison Schedule - HRA Fund 70 Other Post - Employment Benefits Plan Schedule of Funding Progress 71 Notes to Required Supplementary Information 72 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Combining and Individual Non Major Fund Financial Statements and Schedules: Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Fund - Community Development Block Grant Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Special Revenue Fund - Communications Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Special Revenue Fund Police Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Special Revenue Fund - Braemar Memorial Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Combining Statement of Net, Assets - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Assets - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Funds Supplementary Financial Information: Tax Capacity, Tax Levies and Tax Capacity Rates Combined Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Grandview Area Redevelopment District - #1202 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southeast Edina Redevelopment District - #1203 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for 70th Street and Cahill Road District - #1207 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) Financial Trends: Net Assets by Component Changes in Net Assets Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Revenue Capacity: Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property Direct and Overlapping Tax Capacity Rates Principal Property Tax Payers Property Tax Levies and Collections Debt Capacity: Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt Legal Debt Margin Information Pledged Revenue Coverage Demographic and Economic Information: Demographic and Economic Statistics Principal Employers Operating Information: Full -Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function Operating Indicators by Function Capital Asset Statistics by Function Page No. 98 100 102 104 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 Introductory Section June 7, 2012 (71ty 01 Edina To the Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Citizens of the City of Edina (City): Minnesota statutes require that every city publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a complete set of audited financial statements. This report is published to fulfill thiat'requirement for'the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Management assumes full responsibility .for 'the completeness and I reliability;of all of the information presented in this report, based -upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that 'it has established for this purpose. Because. the cost of internal control should' not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co. P.A., a firm of licensed certified public accountants, has issued an unqualified ( "clean ") opinion on the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. The independent auditor's report is located at the front of the financial section of this report. Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD &A) immediately follows the independent auditor's report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. MD &A complement this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it. Profile of the City The City, incorporated in 1888; is a fully developed first -ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City currently occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of 48,262 Currently, 98% of the City is developed with 55.5 % of the land attributed to residential uses, 13.1 % to roadways and 11:8% supporting the park and open space& The remainder of the land is used for commercial, industrial and public/semi- public uses. The City is empowered to levy a property tax on both real and personal property located within its boundaries. The City, has operated under the Council- Manager form of government since 1955. Policy- making and legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor and four other members, all elected on a non- partisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for Passing ordinances; adopting the budget, appointing committees, and hiring the City Manager, The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies, and ordinances of the Council, for overseeing the day -to =day operations of the city government, and for appointing the heads of the various departments. Council .members serve four -year terms, with. two Council members elected every two years. The May&also serves a four -year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large.. The City provides a full range of services,. including police and fire protection; the. construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure; water and sewer services and recreational and cultural activities and events. The Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the fiscal year. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City's financial planning and control. The budget is prepared by fund, function (e.g., public safety), and department (e: g. police). Department heads may use resources within a department as they see fit. The City Manager may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between departments. y Hall 952- 927 -8861 1 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390, VA, NINNESOTA, 55421-1394 WWW.cityofeclinaxom 1'Ty 952 -826 -0379 Local economy The City currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and local indicators point to continued stability. The region, while noted for a strong retail sector, enjoyed considerable re- development in recent years. The re- development consisted of varied manufacturing, medical and high -tech base that adds to the relative stability of the unemployment rate. Major industries with headquarters or divisions within the government's boundaries or in close proximity include medical services, retail operations and banking services. Edina is home to over 50,000 jobs that are expected to remain stable over the coming years. The City has become known for its quality residential housing stock and attractive neighborhoods. To date, approximately 98% of the housing stock is in place. Although the emphasis has changed over the years from exclusively single family housing to a more balanced mix of housing types, the City's concern for overall quality in residential development remains a top priority. The City enjoys a AAA bond rating and a Aaa bond rating from Standard and Poors and Moody's, respectively. Long -term financial planning The Metropolitan Council requires all cities in the seven - county metropolitan area to have a Comprehensive Plan and State law requires cities to update their plans every 10 years. The Comprehensive Plan guides development and redevelopment and addresses changes likely to occur due to various social and market forces. The City updated our Comprehensive Plan and submitted it to the Metropolitan Council for review in 2008. A final version was adopted by the City Council in 2009. The City continues to focus on quality of life improvements throughout Edina. These efforts cover a broad array of areas including protecting and improving the environment, revitalization of parks and public areas, expanding recreational opportunities, expanding City services, and increasing communication between City representatives and the public. The City is working closely with state government, federal government and neighboring communities to improve the area's state and county transportation network, which includes upgraded highways and well - placed pathways. Funding for most of the transportation improvements will need to come from state, county and federal sources, with some minor portion supported by the local taxpayers. Relevant financial policies The City has adopted a set of financial management policies that focus on long -term financial planning. Policies cover areas such as cash and investments, the operating budget, revenue, fund balance, capital outlay, and debt management. Assignments for investments and compensated absences are all calculated as specified in the policies. In addition, the City has $11,744,764 unassigned fund balance in the general fund. This amount is $1,642,395 above the goal range identified in the policy. Major initiatives The City is continually working to update our aging infrastructure. Our annually adopted five -year Capital Improvement Plan includes spending and financing projections for these projects. 2 Awards and Acknowledgements The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Edina for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. This was the fifth consecutive year. that the government has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues -to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the Finance Department staff. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor and the City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the City's finances. Respectfully submitted, John Wallin Finance Director Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director 3 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Edina Minnesota .For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. ��PNiw DPFjc li �C -'Or THE � JUKITED STATES ( AND CAWA ATI d CO�OAATIOM President SEAL tN�iAL4 A Executive Director OF EDINA, MINNESOTA kNIZATION Tiber 31, 2011 James Hovland ouncil Members: Mary Brindle Ann Swenson Joni Bennett Josh Sprague t Manager: Scott Neal inance Director/Treasurer: John Wallin Clerk: Debra Mangen 4" Term Expires December 31, 2012 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2014 Appointed Appointed Appointed CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Gtr ti Information Streets Design & Project Enterprise Patrol Fire & Rescue Maintenance Management Facilities Investigations Building Utility Operations Environmental Parks Inspections Services Maintenance Equipment Civilian Services Operations Community Electrical /HVAC - Financial Section INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the City Council and Residents City of Edina, Minnesota We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements -as listed in the table of contents. These basic financial statements are the responsibility of the City.'s management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these basic financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2011, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable thereof, for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As discussed in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements, the City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions" during the year ended December 31, 2011. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated June 7, 2012 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. (continued) 7 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. ayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952- 545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA KR Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA R T I F I E D PUBLIC James H. Eichten, CPA C O U N T A N T S Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the City Council and Residents City of Edina, Minnesota We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements -as listed in the table of contents. These basic financial statements are the responsibility of the City.'s management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these basic financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2011, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable thereof, for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As discussed in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements, the City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions" during the year ended December 31, 2011. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated June 7, 2012 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. (continued) 7 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. ayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952- 545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management's Discussion and Analysis and the required supplementary information, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by GASB, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section; combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules, supplementary financial information, and statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. v K�.r�o,� s k,'�a�os �. co., �,9 June 7, 2012 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS As management of the City of Edina (the City), we offer readers of the City's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which precedes this report. Financial Highlights • The assets of the City exceeded its liabilities at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $197,931,816 (net assets). Of this amount, $42,470,823 (unrestricted net assets) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the.City's fund designations and fiscal policies. • The City's total net assets increased by $10,018,903. $4,502,112 of this increase is due to special assessment revenues, which help support our road reconstruction program. Also, $3,950,174 of the increase is due to Utility revenues over expenses, which are being reinvested in new or rebuilt infrastructure according to the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Utility Rate Study. • As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $48,906,739, a decrease of $917,733 in comparison with the prior year. • At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the general fund was $11,744,764 or 42% of total general fund expenditures. • The City's total bonded debt increased by $7,315,000 during the current fiscal, year, from $88,135,000 to $95,450,000. The City issued new debt during the year consisting of $14,550,000 general obligation bonds to finance various street and utility infrastructure improvement projects. Overview of the Financial Statements This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City's basic financial statements. The City's basic . financial statements comprise three components: 1) government -wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial. statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to, the basic financial statements themselves. Government -wide financial statements. The government -wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City's finances, in a manner similar to,a private- sector business. The statement of net assets presents information on all of the City's assets and liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net assets. Over time, increases or decreases in net assets may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. 0 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) The statement of activities presents information showing how the City's net assets changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net assets are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave). Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business -type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety, public works and parks. The business -type activities of the City include utilities, liquor, aquatic center, golf course and community activity centers. Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds. Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near -term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near -term financial requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statement. By doing so, readers may better understand the long -term impact of the City's near term financial decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and change in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The City maintains 4 individual major governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund, Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund, debt service fund and the construction fund. Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these non -major governmental funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for its general fund and all of its other governmental and proprietary funds. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for the general fund and all the special revenue funds to demonstrate compliance with these budgets. Proprietary funds. The City maintains four major enterprise funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business -type activities in the governmental - wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its utility, liquor, aquatic center and golf course operations. 10 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Data from the other proprietary funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these non -major proprietary funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government -wide financial statements, only in more detail. Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government -wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City's own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government —wide and fund financial statements. Other information. The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non -major governmental and enterprise funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information on budgetary comparisons. Government -wide Financial Analysis As noted earlier, net assets may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. In the case of the City, assets exceeded liabilities by $197,931,816 at the close of the most recent fiscal year. The largest portion of the City's net assets ($131,922,118 or 67 %) reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. 11 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) City of Edina's Net Assets Govemmental Activities Business -Type Activities Totals 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 Current and other assets $ 66,717,049 Capital assets 134,804,379 Total assets $201,521,428 Long -term liabilities outstanding $ 61,858,058 Other liabilities 12,158,427 Total liabilities $ 74,016,485 $ 66,496,469 129,590,209 $196,086,678 $ 63,872,044 10,769,501 $ 74,641,545 Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 75,045,018 $ 69,783,162 Restricted 22,915,776 9,952,443 Unrestricted 29,544,149 41,709,528 Total net assets $127,504,943 $121,445,133 $ 26,001,510 83,474,196 $109,475,706 $ 31,119,126 7,929,707 $ 39,048,833 $ 21,442,067 71, 644,476 $ 93,086,543 $ 21,493,950 5,124,813 $ 26,618,763 $ 92,718,559 218,278,575 $ 310,997,134 $ 92,977,184 20,088,134 $113,065,318 $ 87,938,536 201,234,685 $289,173,221 $ 85,365,994 15,894,314 $101,260,308 $ 56,877,100 $ 48,807,806 $131,922,118 $118,590,968 623,099 618,852 23,538,875 10,571,295 12,926,674 17,041,122 42,470,823 58,750,650 $ 70,426,873 $ 66,467,780 $197,931,816 $187,912,913 An additional portion of the City's net assets ($23,538,875) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net assets ($42,470,823) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories of net assets reported, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior fiscal year. There was also a decrease of $16,279,827 in unrestricted net assets, largely due to investments in new and rebuilt infrastructure made during the year. 12 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) As shown below, the City's net assets increased by $10,018,903 during the current fiscal year. Factors contributing to this change are discussed in the next two sections. City of Edina's Changes in Net Assets Govemmental Activities Business -type Activities Totals 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 Revenues: Program revenues: Charges for services $ 7,733,906 $ 7,118,171 $ 36,892,116 $ 35,777,795 $ 44,626,022 $.42,895,966 Operating grants and contributions 1,392,892 1,162,411 135,428 373,230 1,528,320 1,535,641 Capital grants and contributions 5,770,912 13,325,431 - - 5,770,912 13,325,431 General revenues: Property taxes 25,040,871 25,122,113 - 25,040,871 25,122,113 Othertaxes 4,805,505 5,180,361 - 4,805,505 5,180,361 Gain on disposal of assets 131,365 35,594 - 26,574 131,365 62,168 Unrestricted investment earnings 601,250 474,444 280,438 205,965 881,688 680,409 Total revenues 45,476,701 52,418,525 37,307,982 36,383,564 82,784,683 88,802,089 Expenses: General government 7,013,231 6,961,082 - - 7,013,231 6,961,082 Public safety 16,024,575 15,543,594 16,024,575 15,543,594 Public works 9,193,336 8,558,363 9,193,336 8,558,363 Parks 5,540,585 5,608,758 5,540,585 5,608,758 Interest on long -term debt 2,339,370 2,528,424 2,339,370 2,528,424 Utilities - - 12,130,685 11,848,538 12,130,685 11,848,538 Liquor 11,727,106 11,594,643 11,727,106 11,594,643 Aquatic center 718,027 769,608 718,027 769,608 Golf course 3,390,949 3,561,573 3,390,949 3,561,573 Community activity centers 4,687,916 4,492,779 4,687,916 4,492,779 Total expenses 40,111,097 39,200,221 32,654,683 32,267,141 72,765,780 71,467,362 Increase in net assets before transfers 5,365,604 13,218,304 4,653,299 4,116,423 10,018,903 17,334,727 Transfers 694,206 765,994 (694,206) (765,994) - - Increase in net assets 6,059,810 13,984,298 3,959,093 3,350,429 10,018,903 17,334,727 Net assets - January 1 121,445,133 107,460,835 66,467,780 63,117,351 187,912,913 170,578,186 Net assets - December 31 $127,504,943 $121,445,133 $ 70,426,873 $ 66,467,780 $197,931,816 $187,912,913 13 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Governmental Activities Governmental activities increased the City's net assets by $6,059,810, accounting for 60% of the total growth in net assets. Key elements of this increase are as follows: • Property tax revenues decreased by $81,242 (0.3 %) during the year, which less than the property tax levy increase of 1% outlined in our 2011 budget due to several commercial property tax petitions, judgments and settlements during the year. • The City also collected $4,083,345 in tax increments, which were used to pay principal and interest on tax increment debt. This increases net assets because debt principal payments are not expensed on the Statement of Activities. • The debt service fund paid a total of $4,480,000 in principal payments during 2011, including the tax increment debt. Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues and expenses: Revenues by Source - Governmental Activities Other Charges for services 2% 17% Other taxes Operating grants and 10% contributions 3% Property taxes -- Capital grants and 55% contributions 13% Expenses and Program Revenues - Governmental Activities Millions 18 16 14 oexpenses 12 o program revenue 10 8 6 4 s 2 General Public safety Public works Parks Interest on government long -term debt 14 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Business-type Activities Business -type activities increased net assets by $3,959,093 accounting for 40% of the City's growth in net assets. Key elements of the current year increase are as follows: • The utility fund had income before transfers of $3,950,174 for 2011. This additional revenue is used to invest in new and rebuilt utility infrastructure according to the City's CIP and utility rate study. • Business -type activities made net transfers of $694,206 to governmental activities during 2011 to provide cash flow for operational and capital improvement needs. Revenues by Source - Business -type Activities Operating grants Other and 0.8% contributions 0.4% Charges for services 98.9% Expenses and Program Revenues - Business -type Activities Millions 16 - t7expenses 14 - 12 _ o program revenue 10 8 - 6 - 4 - 2 - Utilities Liquor Aquatic Golf course Community center activity centers 15 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Financial Analvsis of the Citv's Funds As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance - related legal requirements. Governmental Funds. The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near - term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $48,906,739, a decrease of $917,733 in comparison with the prior year. Approximately 24% of this total amount ($11,744,764) constitutes unassigned fund balance. The remainder of the fund balance is 1) nonspendable due to prepaid items ($10,871), 2) restricted by external creditors, grantors, laws or regulations ($27,512,883), or 3) assigned by internal constraints ($9,638,221). The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance of the general fund was $11,744,764. As a measure of the general fund's liquidity, unassigned fund balance represents 42% of total general fund expenditures. The fund balance of the City's general fund increased by $594,006 during the current fiscal year. Key factors in this increase are as follows: • Total general fund revenues were $1,164,609 over budget, including higher than expected building permit activity. General fund license and permit revenues increased by 13% in the current fiscal year after a 14.5% increase in 2010. • Total general fund expenditures were $730,247 under budget. Much of this savings occurred in the street maintenance and parks maintenance departments, which spent less than budgeted on salaries and benefits due to position openings and paths and hard surfaces repair. • The liquor fund transferred $765,100 of profits to the general fund, as planned in the 2011 budget. • The remaining funds of the communications fund were also transferred into the general fund, as the communications department is budgeted in the general fund beginning in 2012. • Transfers out of the general fund totaled $2,483,530 for a variety of purposes planned as part of the 2012 budget process. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund balance increased by $2,865,432 in the current fiscal year because there were no large spending projects financed from tax increment funds during the year. The debt service fund has a total fund balance of $8,068,183, all of which is restricted for the payment of debt service. The net increase in fund balance during the current year in the debt service fund was $1,963,325. Fund balance increased during the year as the result of $1,328,530 transfer made from the general fund for the early retirement of some debt, as specified by the adopted 2012 budget. The construction fund balance decreased by $5,320,461 in 2011 due to capital outlay related to various projects including the new public works facility. Construction on the $22 million dollar facility was nearly completed in 2011, even though the debt used to finance it was issued in previous years. Also, new debt was issued in 2011 to help finance various street improvement projects. 16 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Proprietary funds. The City's proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. Unrestricted net assets of the utility fund at the end of the year amounted to $9,752,721. The total growth in net assets was $3,850,174. Operating revenues and expenses in the utilities fund increased by 5.6% and 2.9 %, respectively, in 2011, due to rate increases that are intended to help replace aging infrastructure. The City invested $11,222,480 in utility fund capital assets during 2011. Unrestricted net assets of the liquor-fund at the end of the year amounted to $1,582,468. Total net assets increased by $190,278. The liquor fund continues to transfer profits back into other City funds, including the general, construction, golf course, arena and art center funds. The liquor fund' made transfers totaling $1,255,100. to other funds during 2011. The majority of this amount ($765,100).w as transferred to the general fund according to the budget. Unrestricted net assets of the aquatic center fund at the end of the year amounted to $473,338. Aquatic center revenues decreased slightly from 2010 due to more .favorable weather for the aquatic center in 2010. The aquatic center remains profitable and has started construction on a significant new amenity planned for a summer 2012 opening. Unrestricted net assets of the golf course fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($1,411,681), an increase of $36,752 from the prior year. Unrestricted net assets have been declining or essentially flat for a number of years in the golf course fund because cash flow is not sufficient to make principal and interest payments on outstanding debt. General Fund Budgetary Highlights During the year there was a $1,495,751 increase in appropriations between the original and final amended budget. The increase was a transfer to the construction and debt service funds of unreserved and undesignated general fund balance according to the City's previous fund balance policy, before it was revised in December 2011 to comply with new terminology and concepts introduced by GASB Statement No. 54. During the year, revenues were $1,164,609 more than budget, as the improving economy affected our permits and charges for services revenues. The largest increase from 2010 was in the licenses and permits category, which exceeded budget by $378,834. Many City departments were under budget for the year, particularly the street maintenance department, which.was under staffed during the year because positions that came open through attrition were not immediately filled. The parks maintenance department was under budget due partially to lower than expected paths and hard surfaces repair spending: The City.also saved money through lower than expected fuel, commodities, and insurance prices. Capital Asset and Debt Administration Capital assets. The City's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business type activities as of December 31, 2011, amounted to $218,278,575 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets included land, land improvements' intangible, assets such as easements,' infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), buildings, vehicles and equipment. The total increase in the City's investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year was 8.5 percent (a 4 percent increase for governmental activities and a 16.5 percent increase for business -type activities). 17 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following: • The City continued construction on a new public works facility in 2011; construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year has reached $22,269,941. • A variety of street construction, sidewalk and traffic signal projects began in 2011. • Construction started on water treatment plant #6, with an estimated final cost of approximately $6 million dollars. • A variety of utility infrastructure improvements, including watermain, sanitary and storm sewer; construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $12,660,630. City of Edina's Capital Assets (Net of Depreciation) Governmental Activities 2011 2010 Business -Type Activities 2011 2010 Totals 2011 2010 Land and land improvements $ 24,630,058 $ 26,867,389 $ 4,281,650 $ 4,497,718 $ 28,911,708 $ 31,365,107 Easements 111,000 - - - 111,000 - Buildings and it provements 36,293,919 37,983,299 7,757,607 5,608,857 44,051,526 43,592,156 Machinery and equipment 7,561,749 7,419,573 2,334,264 2,601,682 9,896,013 10,021,255 Infrastructure 32,901,599 32,138,548 54,318,904 53,486,360 87,220,503 85,624,908 Construction in progress 33,306,054 25,181,400 14,781,771 5,449,859 48,087,825 30,631,259 Total $134,804,379 $129,590,209 $ 83,474,196 $ 71,644,476 $ 218,278,575 $ 201,234,685 Additional information on the City's capital assets can be found in Note 4. Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long -term debt outstanding of $95,450,000, an increase of $7,315,000 from 2010. This increase resulted from the payment of previously scheduled principal payments offset by $14,550,000 in new debt issued. $29,700,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and special assessments. This amount decreased from 2010 due to regularly scheduled principal payments made during the year. $18,260,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City's special assessment program. This amount increased from 2010 due to a new debt issue to finance the cost of various improvement projects. An additional $2,480,000 of general obligation tax increment debt financed the City's economic development program. This amount decreased in 2011 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues. Also outstanding is $13,160,000 public project revenue bonds which financed two gymnasiums and the new public works facility. This amount decreased in 2011 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues. There is a total of $31,850,000 in revenue bonds for improvements to the enterprise funds. This amount increased $8,475,000 during the year due to issuance of new bonds to finance the cost of various utility infrastructure improvements. 18 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) City of Edina's Outstanding Debt Governmental Activities 2011 2010 Business -Type Activities 2011 2010 Totals 2011 2010 Tax increment bonds $ 2,480,000 $ 3,320,000 $ $ $ 2,480,000 $ 3,320,000 General obligation bonds 29,700,000 31,800,000 29,700,000 31,800,000 Public improvement bonds 18,260,000 16,270,000 18,260,000 16,270,000 Public project revenue bonds 13,160,000 13,370,000 13,160,000 13,370,000 Revenue bonds - - 31,850,000 23,375,000 31,850,000 23,375,000 Total $ 63,600,000 $ 64,760,000 $31,850,000 $23,375,000 $ 95,450,000 0 $ 88,135,000 The City maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AAA rating from Standard & Poor's. State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue up to 3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City is $282,958,227. Only $42,860,000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory limitation. Additional information on the City's long -term debt can be found in Note 5. Economic Factors and Next Year's Budget The City strives to provide an uncommonly high quality of life for our residents and businesses and the relatively healthy local economy helps to make this goal a reality. The unemployment rate in Edina for December 2011 was 5.25 %, well below the state and national levels. The City is home to Southdale Center, the nation's first fully enclosed climate - controlled regional shopping mall, Fairview Southdale hospital, as well as several corporate headquarters. In addition to its healthy economy, Edina is known for excellent public schools, as the Edina school system has been consistently selected as one of the best in the country. Ninety -five percent of seniors go to college and eighty-six percent finish in five years. Property values in Edina increased at a rapid pace for several years through 2006, but values have declined since then. Estimated market value of all real estate actually decreased 7.1% for taxes payable in 2011. Market Value and Tax Capacity Annual Changes Tax Capacity —E Market Value 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 19 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) The City collects property taxes based on tax capacity, which roughly equals estimated market value multiplied by class rates for different types of parcels (commercial, residential, etc.). Class rates are set by state statute. Tax capacity -for real estate decreased 8.3% for taxes payable in 2011, but had been positive from 2002 through 2008. Due to the increases in market value and tax capacity since 2002, property tax rates had been decreasing through 2007, although tax rates now appear to be rising slightly. All of these factors above were considered in preparing the City's budget for the 2012 fiscal year. The City's adopted 2012 budget includes a property tax levy of $26,248,226 for the all funds, an increase of 1.8% from the 2011 levy. Requests for Information This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City's finances for all those with an interest in the government's finances. Questions concerning any ofthe information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Office of the Finance Director, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. The City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report can also be found on the internet at www.cityofedina.com. 20 Basic Financial Statements CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS December 31, 2011 Assets: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Investments Restricted investments Accrued interest Accounts receivable, net Special assessments receivable Internal balances Due from other governments Prepaid items Inventory Total current assets Noncurrent assets: Advances to other funds Deferred charges Investment in joint powers agreement Nondepreciable capital assets Depreciable capital assets (net) Total noncurrent assets Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Accrued interest payable Contracts payable Due to other governments Deposits payable Unearned revenue Compensated absences payable Bonds payable Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities: Net OPEB obligation Compensated absences payable Bonds payable, net of unamortized discount Advances from other funds Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Restricted for tax increments Restricted for debt service Restricted for other Unrestricted Total net assets Primary Government Governmental Business -type Activities Activities 11,332 50,573,378 2,087,548 188,692 609,850 11,196, 888 (891,560) 416,255 10,871 64,203,234 929,350 1,584,465 49, 398,418 85,405,961 137,318,194 201, 521,428 1,960,698 967,020 926,455 605,567 315,563 28,084 153,970 1,531,070 5,670,000 12,158,427 $ 41,132 12,298,702 5,771,731 25,582 3,788,738 513,259 891,580 6,438 . 353,675 1,138, 560 24,829,397 1,000,000 172,113 15,870,736 67,603,460 84,646,309 109,475,706 587,070 259,649 365,053 3,248,961 83,681 112,216 52,733 340,344 2,880,000 7,929,707 907,565 119,780 2,296,604 510,519 58,653,889 29,488,827 - 1,000,000 61,858,058 31,119,126 74,016,485 39,048,833 75,045,018 13,680,570 8,068,183 1,167,023 29,544,149 $ 127,504,943 56,877,100 623,099 12,926,674 $ 70,426,873 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 21 Total 52,464 62,872,080 7,859,279 214,274 4,398,588 11,710,147 422,693 364,546 1;138.560 89,032,631 1,000,000 1,101,463 1,584,465 65,269,154 153,009,421 221,964,503 310,997,134 2,547,768 ,1,226,669 1,291,508 3,854,528 399,244 140,300 206,703 1,871,414 8,550,000 20,088,134 1,027,345 2,807,123 88,142,716 1,000,000 92, 977,184 113,065,318 131,922,118 13,680,570 8,691,282 1,167,023 42,470,823 $ 197,931,816 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Program Revenues Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Expenses Services Contributions Contribution: Functions /Programs Primary government: 163,516 $ Governmental activities: 845,011 General government $ 7,013,231 Public safety 16,024,575 Public works 9,193,336 Parks 5,540,585 Interest on long -term debt 2,339,370 Total government activities 40,111,097 Business -type activities: Utilities 12,130,685 Liquor 11,727,106 Aquatic center 718,027 Golf course 3,390,949 Community activity centers 4,687,916 Total business -type activities 32,654,683 $ 969,745 $ 163,516 $ 5,988,485 845,011 378,233 195,000 5,742,1E 397,443 87,389 28,71 - 101,976 7,733,906 1,392,892 5,770,9' 15,873,937 118,351 13,172,484 - 913,383 - 3,285,741 - 3,646,571 17,077 36,892,116 135,428 Total primary government $ 72,765,780 $ 44,626,022 $ 1,528,320 $ 5,770,9' The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 22 General revenues: Property taxes Tax increment collections Franchise taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain on disposal of capital assets ransfers Total general revenues and transfers ge in net assets assets - beginning assets - ending Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Assets Governmental Activities Business -type Activities Total $ (5,879,970) $ - $ (5,879,970) (9,191,079) - (9,191,079) (2,877,934) - (2,877,934) (5,027,010) - (5,027,010) (2,237,394) - (2,237,394) (25,2131387) - (25,213,387) (25,213,387) 3,861,603 3,861,603 1,445,378 1,445,378 195,356 195,356 (105,208) (105,208) (1,024,268) (1,024,268) 4,372,861 4,372,861 4,372,861 (20,840,526) 25,040,871 - 25,040,871 4,083,345 - 4,083,345 722,160 - 722,160 601,250 280,438 881,688 A31,365 - 131,365 694,206 (694,206) - 31,273,197 (413,768) 30,859,429 6,059,810 3,959,093 10,018,903 121,445,133 66,467,780 187,912,913 23 $ 127,504,943 $ 70,426,873 $ 197,931,816 This page left blank intentionally. 24 ;ITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ALANCE SHEET GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS iecember 31, 2011 iabilities and fund balances Housing & Nonspendable Nonmajor Total - 10,871 'Restricted Redevelopment Debt 988,728 27,512,883 Governmental Governmental $ 539,265 General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds ssets 3,766 - 967,020 Contracts payable - - - ash and cash equivalents $ - $ 6,279 $ - $ - $ 5,053 $ 11,332 nrestricted investments i 14,807,041 16,882,598 8,401,924 9,992,195 489,620 50,573,378 estricted investments - - - 2,087,548 - 2,087,548 ccrued interest 35,205 103,250 14,948 34,420 869 188,692 ,ccounts receivable 591,535 - - 17,215 1,100 609,850 special assessments 3,171,395 85,072 16,724,351 : :receivable - - 9,980,167 1,216,721 - 11,196,888 Due from other funds 64,899 - - - 471,377 536,276 Due from other governments 247,317 32,822 20,556 9,779 105,781 416,255 prepaid items 10,871 - - - - 10,87.1 Total assets 15,756,868 17,024,949 18,417,595 13,357,878 1,073,800 65,631,090 iabilities and fund balances Nonspendable 10,871 - -iabilities: - 10,871 'Restricted 178,295 16,190,129 8,068,183 2,087,548 988,728 27,512,883 Accounts payable $ 679,646 $ 539,265 $ 4,100 $ 734,615 $ 3,072 $ 1,960,698 Salaries payable 963,254 - - 3,766 - 967,020 Contracts payable - - - 605,567 - 605,567 Due to other funds 346,100 64,899 341,260 593,597 82,000 1,427,856 Due to other governments 74,403 230,656 9,887 617 - 315,563 Deposits payable 15,159 - - 12,925 - 28,084 Unearned revenue 153,970 - - - - 153,970 Deferred revenue 51,120 - 9,994,165 1,220,308 - 11,265,593 Total liabilities 2,283,652 834,820 10,349,412 3,171,395 85,072 16,724,351 =und balance: Nonspendable 10,871 - - - - 10,871 'Restricted 178,295 16,190,129 8,068,183 2,087,548 988,728 27,512,883 Assigned 1,539,286 - - 8,098,935 - 9,638,221 Unassigned 11,744,764 - - - - 11,744,764 Total fund balance 13,473,216 16,190,129 8,068,183 10,186,483 988,728 48,906,739 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 15,756,868 $ 17,024,949 $ 18,417,595 $ 13,357,878 $ 1,073,800 $ 65,631,090 ind balance reported above $ 48,906,739 mounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net assets are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources, and therefore, are not reported in the funds Investment in joint powers agreement are not available to pay for current - period expenditures, and therefore, are not reported in the funds Other long -term assets are not available to pay for current - period expenditures and, therefore, are deferred in the funds Long -term liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds. ,t assets of governmental activities The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 25 134,804,379 1,584,465 11,265,593 (69,056,233) $ 127,504,943 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTALFUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Revenues: General property taxes Tax increment collections Franchise fees Special assessments License and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Investment income Rental of property Other revenues Total revenues Housing & Nonmajor Total Redevelopment Debt Governmental Government; General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds $ 20,607,645 $ - $ 3,722,300 $ 642,221 $ - $ 24,972,16 - 4,083,345 - - - 4,083,34 - - - - 722,160 722,16 Public safety 2,466,394 2,035,718 - 4,502,11 2,688,324 - - 36,439 - 2,724,761 918,726 - 101,976 1,867,831 171,431 3,059,96 3,107,866 - - 58,682 15,413 3,181,96 1,128,328 - - - 115,098 1,243,42 59,849 319,825 66,188 96,589 58,799 601,25 538,269 - - 822 - 539,09 38,815 - - 44,008 73,408 156,23 29,087,822 4,403,170 6,356,858 4,782,310 1,156,309 45,786,46 Expenditures: 5,615,66 (2,483,530) (934,359) - (320,894) (1,182,680) (4,921,46 - - - 209,773 - Current: - - 101,646 3,218,354 - 3,320,OC - - - 108,097 - 108,05 General government 4,188,989 576,196 - 90,697 883,599 5,739,48 Public safety 14,490,117 - - 74,682 103,973 14,668,77 Public works 5,756,283 - - 244,256 - 6,000,53 Parks 3,522,677 - - 105,153 6,092 3,633,92 Capital outlay: General government - - - 679,538 - 679,53 Public safety - - - 1,104,449 - 1,104,44 Public works - - - 11,753,859 - 11,753,85 Parks - 27,183 - 670,467 - 697,65 Debt service: Bond principal - - 4,480,000 - - 4,480,00 Interest and fiscal charges - - 2,278,068 - - 2,278,06 Total expenditures 27,958,066 603,379 6,758,068 14,723,101 993,664 51,036,27 Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Sale of capital assets Bonds issued Premium on bonds issued Total other financing sources (uses) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 1,129,756 3,799,791 (401,210) (9,940,791) 162,645 (5,249,80 1,947,780 - 2,262,889 1,405,000 - 5,615,66 (2,483,530) (934,359) - (320,894) (1,182,680) (4,921,46 - - - 209,773 - 209,77 - - 101,646 3,218,354 - 3,320,OC - - - 108,097 - 108,05 (535,750) (934,359) 2,364,535 4,620,330 (1,182,680) 4,332,0 594,006 2,865,432 1,963,325 (5,320,461) (1,020,035) (917,7q Fund balance - January 1 12,879,210 13,324,697 6,104,858 15,506,944 2,008,763 49,824,4 Fund balance - December 31 $ 13,473,216 $ 16,190,129 $ 8,068,183 $ 10,186,483 $ 988,728 $ 48,906,7 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 26 ITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, PENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF OVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES r The Year Ended December 31, 2011 reported for governmental activities in the ant of activities (page 22 -23) are different because: Net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds (page 26) . $ (917,733) Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. 6,877,043 In the statement of activities, only the gain on the sale of capital assets is reported. However, in the governmental funds, the proceeds from the sale increases financial resources. Thus, the change in net assets differs from the change in fund balance by the cost of the capital assets sold. (78,408) Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources (property tax and special assessment receivables) are not reported as revenues in the funds. (441,133) The issuance of long -term debt (e.g., bonds, leases) provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long -term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets. Also, governmental funds report the effect of issuance costs, premiums, discounts and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities. This amount is the net effect of these differences in the treatment of long -term debt-and related items. 1,070,591 Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources (OPEB obligations, accrued interest and amortization on -debt and compensated absences payable) and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. (450,550) Change in net assets of governmental activities (page 23) $ 6,059,810 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 27 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS PROPRIETARY FUNDS December 31, 2011 Assets: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Unrestricted investments Restricted investments Interest receivable Accounts receivable, net Special assessments receivable Due from other funds Due from.other governments Prepaid expenses Inventory Total current assets Noncurrent assets: Advances to other Deferred. charges Net capital assets Total noncurrent assets Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Accrued interest payable Contracts payable Due to other funds Due to other governments Deposits payable Unearned revenue Compensated absences payable Bonds payable - current Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities: Net OPEB obligation Compensated absences payable Bonds payable, net of unamortized discounts Advances from other funds Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Restricted for debt service Unrestricted Total net assets Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise Utilities Liquor Center Course Funds Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 41,132 $ 41,13 9,631,620 - - - 2,667,082 12,298,70. 5,771,731 - - - - 5,771,,78 12,616 - - - 12,966 25,58 3,667,389 - - - 121,349 3,788;73 513,259 - - - - 513,25 - 1,208,710' 361,362 - 157,302 1,727,37 6,438 - - - - 6;43 353,675 - - - - 353167 18,725 1,027,018 - 80,492 12,325 1,138;56 19,975,453 2,235,728 361,362 80,492 3,012,156 25,665,19 1,000;000 - - 1,000100 136,982 - 6,001 - 3,776 25,354 172,11 69,535,583 1,197,809 2,072';562 4,345,834 6,322,408 83,47..4;19 69,672,565 11197,809 3,078,563 4,349,610 6,347,762 84,646;30 89,648,018 3,433,537 , 3,439,925 4,430,102 9,359,918 110,311,50 162,833 260,237 738 48,328 114,934 587,07 62,403 63,085. - 49,969 84,192 259,6,4 317,052 ; . 7,277 5,891 34,833 365,05 2,986,053 -, 262,908 - - 3,248;96 .751,547 - - 84,247 - 835,79 9,643 54,602 3 5,128 14,305 83;68 112,216 - - - - 112;21 - 6,731 - 37,867 8,135 52;7,3 60,491 9.9,204 - p 94;277 86,372 340;34 2,360,000 - 135,000 _ 285,000 100,000 2,880;00 6,822,238 483;859 405,926 610,707 442,771 81765,5a 35,008 .20,594 - 28,826 35,352 .119,7E 90,737 148,807 - .141,416 129,559 ;510,51 26,439,843 - 463,354 313,329 2,272,301 29,488,82 - - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,0E 26,565,588 169,401 463,354 1,483,571 2,437,212 31,119;12 33,387,826 653,260 869,280 .2,094,278 2,879,983 39 46,507,471 1,197,809 1,474,208 3,747,505 3,950,107 66,877,1 - - 623,099 - - 623,0 9,752,721 1,582,468 473,338 (1,411,681) 2,529,828 12,926;6 $ 56,260,192 $ 2,780,277 $ 2,570,645 $ 2,335,824 $ 6,479,935 $ 70,426,8 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. . 28 ITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET ASSETS ROPRIETARY FUNDS - r The Year Ended December 31, 2011 )perating expenses: 118,351 Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds - - - 118,351 Cost of sales and services 1,862 Nonmajor 31,115 320,132 104,853 10,106,122 Aquatic Golf Enterprise 284,211 1,564,676 Utilities Liquor Center Course Funds Total perating revenues: 1,333,023 8,748,935 Commodities 751,191 61,182 61,400 Sales - liquor $ - $ 12,904,363 $ - $ 145,492 $ - $ 13,049,855 Sales - retail - 268,121 4,466 230,865 41,706 545,158 Sales - utilities 15,560,607 - - - - 15,560,607 .Sales - concessions - - 117,148 203,598 85,556 406,302 Memberships - - 418;982 108,978 87,492 615,452 Admissions - - 333,889 313,735 767,123 1,414,747 .Building rental - - 38,898 87,081 1,377,571 1,503,550 .Rental of equipment - - - 335,161 119,230 454,391 Greens fees - - - 1,517,962 .179,615 1,697,577 Otherfees 310,495 - - 338,353 988,278 1,637,126 Total operating revenues 15,871,102 13,172,484 913,383 3,281,225 3,646,571 36,884,765 )perating expenses: 118,351 - - - - 118,351 Cost of sales and services 1,862 9,648,160 31,115 320,132 104,853 10,106,122 Personal services 1,636,444 1,265,572 284,211 1,564,676 1,991,212 6,742,115 Contractual services 6,202,412 490,303 94,850 628,347 1,333,023 8,748,935 Commodities 751,191 61,182 61,400 329,006 422,596 1,625,375 Central Services 526,452 194,491 22,804 128,266 169,778 1,041,791 Depreciation 2,319,927 67,398 194,456 412,683 581,999 3,576,463 Total operating expenses 11,438,288 11,727,106 688,836 3,383,110 4,603,461 31,840,801 )perating income (loss) 4,432,814 1,445,378 224,547 (101,885) (956,890) 5,043,964 lonoperating revenues (expenses): Intergovernmental 118,351 - - - - 118,351 Investment income 88,571 - - - 191,867 280,438 Donations - - - - 17,077 17,077 Interest and fiscal charges (705,482) - (14,713) (11,928) (83,733) (815,856) Amortization of bond deferred charges (discounts) 13,085 - (593) (447) (722) 11,323 Gain (loss) on sale of capital asset - - (13,885) 4,536 - (9,349) Miscellaneous 2,835 - - 4,516 - 7,351 Total nonoperating revenues(expenses) (482,640) - (29,191) (3,323) 124,489 (390,665) icome (loss) before transfers 3,950,174 1,445,378 195,356 (105,208) (832,401) 4,653,299 ' ransfers: Transfers in - - - 100,000 4,690,587 4,790,587 'Transfers out (100,000) (1,255,100) - - (4,129,693) (5,484,793) Total transfers (100,006) (1,255,100) - 100,000 560,894 (694,206) ;hange in net assets 3,850,174 190,278 195,356 (5,208) (271,507) 3,959,093 let assets - January 1 52,410,018 2,589,999 2,375,289 2,341,032 6,751,442 66,467,780 let assets - December 31 $ 56,260,192 $ 2,780,277 $ 2,570,645 $ 2,335,824 $ 6,479,935 $ 70,426,873 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. Q1 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Cash flows from operating activities: Receipts from customers and users Payment to suppliers Payment to employees Donations received Miscellaneous received Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Activities - Enterprise Funds Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise Utilities Liquor Center Course Funds Total $ 15,220,562 $ 13,175,208 $ 913,383 $ 3,262,827 $ 3,599,542 $36,171 ,5 (7,697,569) (10,319,545) (211,430) (1,438,357) (2,170,241) (21,837,1 (1,671,380) (1,286,201) (287,091) (1,528,687) (2,074,938) (6,848,2 - - - - 17,077 17,0 2,835 - - 4,516 - 7,35 5,854,448 1,569,462 414,862 300,299 (628,560) 7,510,51 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: State grant 118,351 - - - - 118,35 Transfer from other funds - - - 100,000 271,742 371,74 Transfer to other funds (100,000) (1,255,100) - - (31,742) (1,386,84 Proceeds from interfund borrowing 751,547 890,000 1,298,000 1,084,247 220,000 4,243,79 Payment of interfund borrowing (135,000) (1,208,710) (1,361,362) (1,110,000) (165,302) 3( 980,37 Net cash provided by (used in) noncapital financing activities 634,898 (1,573,810) (63,362) 74,247 294,698 (633,32 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Transfer from other funds - Proceeds from capital debt 11,527,236 Acquisition of capital assets (11,222,480) Proceeds from sale 11,527,22 of capital assets - Principal paid on bonds (2,270,000) Interest paid on bonds (693,285) Net cash provided by (used in) (80,000) capital and related _ (15,949) (14,699) financing activities (2,658,529) Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of investments Purchase of investments Interest received Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 14,003,000 (17,906,067) 71,921 - - - 320,894 320,89 - - - - 11,527,22 - (454,603) (89,608) (477,686) (12,244,37 - - 6,750 - 6,7,r - (125,000) (280,000) (80,000) (2,755,OC _ (15,949) (14,699) (84,400) 808,3 (595,552) (377,557) (321,192) (3,952,8: - - 564,979 14,567,97 - (17,906,OE 123,861 195,7E (3,831,146) - - - 688,840 3,142,3( (329) (4,348) (244,052) (3,011) 33,786 (217,9: 329 4,348 244,052 3,011 7,346 259,0E $ 41,132 $ 41,1; The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 30 rY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ;OPRIETARY FUNDS r The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 5,854,448 $ 1,569,462 $ 414,862 $ 300,299 $ (628,560) $ 7,510,511 Noncash investing activities: Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments 47,214 - - - 74,241 121,455 Noncash noncapital financing activities: Transfer net assets to new fund - - - - (4,097,951) (4,097,951) Transfer of net assets from old fund - - - - 4,097,951 4,097,951 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 31 Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise Utilities Liquor Center Course Funds Total Reconciliation of operating income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Operating income (loss) $ 4,432,814 $ 1,445,378 $ 224,547 $ (101,885) $ (956,890) $ 5,043,964 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation 2,319,927 67,398 194,456 412,683 581,999 3,576,463 Donations - - - - 17,077 17,077 Miscellaneous revenue 2,835 - - 4,516 - 7,351 Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in receivables (586,606) - - 22 1,015 (585,569) Decrease (increase) in special assessments (78,754) - - - - (78,754) Decrease (increase) in due from other governments 14,820 - - - - 14,820 Decrease (increase) in inventory (3,973) 84,727 - (19,559) 754 61,949 Decrease (increase) in prepaid items 11,633 - - - - 11,633 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (225,156) (4,115) (1,222) (13,998) (143,811) (388,302) Increase (decrease) in salaries payable 947 (3,761) (2,880) 8,045 (4,751) (2,400) Increase (decrease) in due to other governments 1,844 (6,021) (39) 951 3,066 (199) Increase(decrease)in unearned revenue - 2,724 - (18,420) (48,044) (63,740) Increase(decrease)in net OPEB obligation 7,153 3,936 - 5,444 6,907 23,440 Increase (decrease) in compensated absences (43,036) (20,804) - 22,500 (85,882) (127,222) Total adjustments 1,421,634 124,084 190,315 402,184 328,330 2,466,547 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 5,854,448 $ 1,569,462 $ 414,862 $ 300,299 $ (628,560) $ 7,510,511 Noncash investing activities: Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments 47,214 - - - 74,241 121,455 Noncash noncapital financing activities: Transfer net assets to new fund - - - - (4,097,951) (4,097,951) Transfer of net assets from old fund - - - - 4,097,951 4,097,951 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 31 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET ASSETS AGENCY FUNDS December 31, 2011 Assets Cash Investments Total assets Liabilities Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other governmental units Total liabilities Agency Funds $ 58,038 310,000 $ 368,038 $ 32,254 7,016 328,768' t $ 368,038' _` f µ, The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 32 Notes to the Financial Statements CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Note 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The City of Edina (the City) was incorporated in 1888 and operates under the State of Minnesota Statutory Plan B form of government. The governing body consists of a five- member City Council elected by voters of the City. The financial statements of the City have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles) as applied to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The following is a summary of significant accounting policies. A. FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY The City's financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, (b) organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The primary government is financially accountable for the component unit if it appoints a voting majority of the component unit's governing body and is able to impose its will on the component unit or there is a potential for the component unit to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on, the primary government. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the reporting entity include those of the City of Edina (the primary government) and its component units. The component units discussed below are included in the City's reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationships with the City, COMPONENT UNITS In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the component unit have been included in the financial reporting entity as a blended component unit. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the City.. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of the City's operations because the members of the City Council serve as HRA board members and its activity is confined to the City of Edina. The activity of the HRA is reported in the Special Revenue Funds. Separate financial statements are not prepared for the HRA. B. GOVERNMENT -WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net assets and the statement of changes in net assets) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. 33 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or business -type activity are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business -type activity. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or business -type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business type activity. Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government -wide financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated information for the remaining nonmajor governmental and enterprise funds is reported in a single column in the fund financial statements C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and fiduciary fund financial statements. The City's only fiduciary fund type, agency funds, are custodial in nature and do not have a measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments are recorded only when payment is due. Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the City. 34 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 The City reports the following major governmental funds: The general fund is the government's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The special revenue Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (property taxes, bond proceeds, investment earnings, etc.) that are designated for housing and redevelopment. The debt service fund accounts for the payment of principal and interest on the Tax Increment, General Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, and Public Project Revenue Bonds. The capital projects construction fund accounts for the various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for capital improvements as designated in the City's capital improvement budget. The City reports the following major proprietary funds: The utility fund accounts for the provision of water, sewer and recycling services to the City's residents. The liquor fund accounts for the operation of the City's three liquor stores. The aquatic center fund accounts for the operation of the City's aquatic center. The golf course fund accounts for the operation of the City's three golf courses and a golf dome. Additionally, the City reports the following fund type: Agency - the police seizure, Public Safety Training Facility, and 1 -494 Corridor Commission funds account for fees collected for other government agencies,and the payroll fund accounts for payroll deductions withheld from employee paychecks but not yet sent to the appropriate party (includes federal and state taxes, health care deductions, etc). Private - sector standards of accounting and financial reporting issued prior to December 1, 1989, generally are'followed in-both the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements to the extent that those standards do not conflict with or contradict guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. Governments also have the option of following subsequent private- sector guidance for their business -type activities and enterprise funds, subject to this same limitation. The City has elected not to follow subsequent private- sector guidance. 35 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government -wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions that would be treated as revenues, expenditures or expenses if they involved external organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu of taxes, are similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City of Edina. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned. Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the utilities, liquor, aquatic center, golf course, arena, art center, Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake, Edinborough Park, and Centennial Lake enterprise funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for an allowable use, it is the City's policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. Depreciation expense is included in the direct expenses of each function. Interest on long -term debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the Statement of Activities. D. CASH AND INVESTMENTS The City's cash and cash equivalents are considered to be deposits and cash on hand for purposes of the cash flow statement. Cash balances from all funds are pooled together and invested to the maximum extent at favorable rates. This also allows certain funds to generate a temporary cash overdraft. Interest earned is allocated as determined by the Investment Advisory Committee. The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash balances by means of an advance from another fund shown as interfund receivables in the advancing fund, and an interfund payable in the fund with the deficit, until adequate resources are received. These interfund balances are eliminated on the government -wide financial statements. 36 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Investments are generally stated at fair value, except for investments in 2a7 -like external investment pools, which are stated at amortized cost. Changes in fair value of securities in the City's investment portfolio are recorded as a net change in fair value of investments in the City's fund financial statements and within general revenues in the'government- wide financial statements. E. RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds for goods provided or services rendered. Short-term interfund loans are classified as "due to /from other funds." All short-term interfund receivables and payables at December 31, 2011 are planned to be eliminated in 2012. Interfund receivables and payables at December 31, 2011 that are not expected to be eliminated in 2012 are classified as "Advances to /from other funds ". Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business -type activities are reported in the government -wide financial statements as "internal balances." Property taxes and special assessments receivables have been reported net of estimated uncollectible accounts. Because utility bills are considered liens on property, no estimated uncollectible amounts are established. Uncollectible amounts are not material for other receivables and have not been reported. F. REVENUE RECOGNITION 1. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RECOGNITION The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in December (levy /assessment date) of each year for collection in the following year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for itself, the City; the local School District and other taxing authorities. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date: Real property taxes are payable (by property owners) on May 15 and October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are payable by taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of'each year. These taxes are collected by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 7 and December 2 of the same year. Delinquent collections for November and December are received the following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes by property owners. The County possesses this authority. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes property tax revenue in the period for which the taxes were levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported. 37 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City. recognizes property tax revenue when,it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current;period. In practice, current and delinquent taxes, and State credits received by the City in July, December and January are recognized: as revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and taxes and credits not received'at the year - end,are classified as ,.delinquent and due from County taxes receivable. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected by the City in January are fully offset by deferred revenue because they are not available to finance current expenditures. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION Special assessments are levied. against benefited properties for the cost or a portion of the cost of special assessment improvement projects in accordance with State Statutes. These assessments are coil ectible,,by the City over a term of years usually consistent with -the term of the °related bond issue. Collection of annual installments (including interest) is handled by-the County Auditor in the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do) prepay future. installments without interest or prepayment penalties. Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the, amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the, amount is determined to be excessive by the CityCouncil or court action. If special assessments are allowed to go delinquent;� the.property;is subject to tax forfeit sale. Pursuant to State Statutes, 'a property'shall'be subject Jo a tax forfeit sale after three years unless it is homesteaded, agricultural or., seasonal recreational land in which event the property is subject to.such.sale. after. five years. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes special assessment revenue ,in the period that the assessment roll was adopted, by the City Council. Uncollectible special assessments are not material and have not been,reported. GOVERNMENTAL FUND`FINANCIAL.STATEMENTS Revenue from special assessments is. recognized by the City when it becomes measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In practice, current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are recognized as 'revenue for the current year. Special. assessments that are collected by the County by December 31. (remitted to the City the following January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining delinquent, deferred and special deferred assessments receivable in governmental funds are completely offset by deferred revenues. 38 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 G. INVENTORIES, PREPAID ITEMS AND DEFERRED CHARGES Inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost and are recorded as expenses when consumed rather than when purchased. Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded'as prepaid items in both government -wide and fund financial statements. Deferred charges represent deferred issuance costs. H. CAPITAL ASSETS Capital assets, which include property, buildings, improvements, equipment, parks, infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), and intangible assets such as easements, are reported in the applicable governmental or business -type activities columns in the government -wide financial statements. Capital assets are also reported in the proprietary fund financial statements but not in the governmental fund financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $10,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of three years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Infrastructure assets include all of the City's assets since inception. Property, plant and equipment of the primary government is depreciated using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Life Golf course 10 - 35 years Land improvements 15 -; 50 years Buildings and structures 15 - 40 years Furniture and office equipment 5 - 10 years Vehicles and equipment 3 - 20 years Parks 5 - 100 years Utility infrastructure 20 - 50 years 39 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 I. COMPENSATED ABSENCES It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations and retirements. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards No. 16, Accounting for Compensated Absences, no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulating rights to receive sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized for that portion of accumulating sick leave benefits that is vested as severance pay. According to City policy, vested sick leave benefits are liquidated into a health care savings plan upon separation. !"Eme]ZR51:4X,116I 74ICT- Ai1e]Z&I In the government -wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long -term debt and other long -term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business -type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net assets. Bond premiums and discounts, as well as issuance costs, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bond using the straight -line method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. Bond issuance costs are reported as deferred charges and amortized over the term of the related debt. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued plus any premium received is reported as other financing sources. Discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. K. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures /expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures /expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of expenditures /expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Interfund loans are reported as an interfund loan receivable or payable which offsets the movement of cash between funds. All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers. L. FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATION In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows: 40 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 • Nonspendable — Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long -term assets. • Restricted — Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. . • Committed — Consists of internally. imposed constraints that are established by resolution of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot 'be used for any other purpose unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts. • Assigned — Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In the general fund, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the City Council. • Unassigned — The residual classification for the general fund which also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned. M. NET ASSETS In the government -wide financial statements, net assets represent the difference between assets and liabilities. Net assets are displayed in three components: Net assets invested in capital assets, net of related debt - Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balance of any long -term debt used,.to build or acquire the capital assets. Restricted net assets — Consists of net assets restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use:through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments. Unrestricted net assets - All other net assets that do not meet the definition .of "restricted" or "invested in capital assets, net of related debt." N. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect amounts reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates. 41 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 O. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE For the year ended December 31, 2011, the City has implemented GASB statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions." The objective of this statement is to enhance the usefulness of fund balance information by providing clearer fund balance classifications that can be more consistently applied and by clarifying the existing governmental fund type definitions. This statement establishes fund balance classifications that comprise a hierarchy based primarily on the extent to which a government is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources reported in governmental funds. Note 2 RECONCILIATION OF GOVERNMENT -WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A. EXPLANATION OF CERTAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCE SHEET AND THE GOVERNMENT -WIDE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS The governmental fund balance sheet includes a reconciliation between fund balance — total governmental funds and net assets — governmental activities as reported in the government -wide statement of net assets. One element of that reconciliation explains that "long -term liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds." The details of this difference are as follows: Bonds payable $ 63,600,000 Plus: issuance premium 987,901 Less: issuance discount (264,012) Less: deferred charges (929,350) Accrued interest payable 926,455 OPEB obligation 907,565 Compensated absences 3,827,674 Net adjustment to reduce fund balance - total govemmental funds to arrive at net assets - govemmental activities $ 69,056,233 42 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 B. EXPLANATION OF CERTAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENTAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES AND THE GOVERNMENT -WIDE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances includes `a reconciliation between net changes in fund balances — total governmental funds and changes in net assets of governmental activities as reported in the government -wide statement of activities. One element of that reconciliation explains that "Governmental funds report capital outlays and investments in joint ventures as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets and investments are allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense." The details of this difference are as follows: Capital outlay $ 12,968,672 Investment in joint venture 132,000 Depreciation expense (6,223,629) Net adjustment to increase net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds to arrive at changes in net assets of govemmental funds $ 6,877,043 Another element of that reconciliation states that "The issuance of long -term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long -term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets. Also, governmental funds report the effect of issuance costs, premiums, discounts and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities." The details of this difference are as follows: Debt issued or incurred: Issuance of permanent improvement revolving bonds Less deferred charges Plus premiums Principal repayments: Tax increment debt General obligation debt Permanent improvement revolving debt Public project revenue debt Net adjustment to decrease net changes- in fund balances - total govemmental funds to arrive at changes in net assets of governmental activities $ 3,320,000 (18, 688) 108,097 (840, 000) (2,100, 000) (1, 330, 000) (210, 000) $ (1,070,591) Another element of that reconciliation states that "Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and 43 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 therefore are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds." The details of this difference are as follows: OPEB obligation $ (187,879) Compensated absences (182,681) Accrued, interest (49,993) Amortization of deferred charges (99,567) Amortization of bond'discounts and premiums 69,570 Net adjustment to decrease net changes in fund Investments - Statement of Net Assets balances -total govemmental funds to arrive at Restricted investments - Statement of Net Assets changes in net assets of'govemmental activities $ (450,550) Note 3 CASH AND INVESTMENTS, A. COMPONENTS OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS r' Cash and investments at year -end consist of the following: Deposits $ 91,017 Cash on hand 19,485 Investments 71, 041, 359 $ 71,151,861 Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows: Cash and cash equivalents - Statement of Net Assets $ 52,464 Investments - Statement of Net Assets 62,872,080 Restricted investments - Statement of Net Assets 7,859,279 Cash and investments - Statement. of Fiduciary Net Assets 368,038 $ 71,151,861 1 The City had restricted investments of $7,859,279 as of December 31, 2011 that represent unspent bond proceeds to be used for construction projects. B. DEPOSITS In accordance with applicable - Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the City Council, including checking accounts, savings accounts and certificates,ofAeposit. The following is considered the.most significant risk associated with deposits: Custodial credit risk - In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City's deposits may be lost. 44 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized, collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AA" or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pl' a ed as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The City's investment policy does not contain further restrictions on the types of collateral required. At year -end, the carrying amount of the City's deposits was $91,017 while the balance on the bank records was $1,115,747. At December 31, 2011, all deposits were fully covered by federal depository insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name. 45 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 C. INVESTMENTS The City has the following investments at year end: Credit Risk Interest Risk - Maturity Duration in Years Investment; Rating Agency <1 1 to 5 5 to 10. U.S. Treasuries AA + /Aaa S &P/Mdys $ - $ - $ 464,704 $ GNMA 3 AA + /Aaa S &P/Mdys - SBANotes AA + /Aaa S &P/Mdys 190,735 112,094 sBANote§ N/R N /A' - 82,114 75,106 U.S. Agencies AA + /Aaa S &P/W y's 12,490,760 16,289,017 1,275,851 Municipals N/R N/A 1,400,000 - - Municipals AAA . r, S &P 102,697 - Municipals AAA/Aaa S&P/Wy's 513,290 Municipals AA/Aa1 S &P/N1dys 153,797 Municipals Aa1 . Mdys 101,549 Municipals Aaa Mdys 206,081 - Municipals AA + /Aaa S &P /Mdys 358,044 '78,563 89;990 Municipals AA + /Aa1 S &P/Wys 101,330 525,479 Municipals Aa3 Mdys 214,288 Municipals AA1Aa2 . S &P/Mdys 1,032,100 Municipals AA - /Aa3 S &P/Wldys 511,445 Commercial 10+ Total 653,780 $ 1,118,484 91,453 91,453 - 302,829 189,833 347,053 3,041,590 33,097,218 - 1,400,000 102,697 513,290 2,595,000 2,748,797 - 101,549 206,081 526,597 626,809 214,288 1,032,100 511,445 paper A1+ S &P 4,535,950 - 4,535,950 Negotiable CD's N/R N/A 11,959,285 978,190 12,937,475 $31,922,783 $19,901,931 $ 2,017,745 $ 6,571,656 60,414,115 Money Market' AAA S &P 4M Fund` N/R N/A Total investments N /A- Not Applicable N/R - Not Rated ` - The City's money market investments don't have maturities 5,736,135 4,891,109 $71,041,359 The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is regulated by Minnesota Statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is an external investment pool not registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) that follows the same regulatory rules of the SEC under rule 2a7. The City's investment in the 4M Fund is measured at the net asset value per share provided by.the pool, which is based on an amortized cost method that approximates fair value. Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most significant: Custodial .credit risk - For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker- dealer) the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The_ City's investment policy specifically addresses custodial credit risk, requiring the City to limit its M. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the securities. Credit risk — This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City's investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act'of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of thirteen months or less; general obligations rated "AK or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated "A" or better; bankers' acceptances of United' State's banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain Minnesota securities broker - dealers. The City's investment policies specifically address credit risk, further limiting the City's exposure to credit risk by requiring that all state and local government obligations to be rated "AX or better by a national rating agency. Concentration risk — This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the City's investment (considered 5 percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments. (such as. Treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The City's investment policies specifically address the City's desire to limit concentration risk,-,but do not set specific . guidelines for measurement of this risk. At year -end, the City's investments include 16 %'and 29% in securities issued by FHLB and FNMA, respectively. Interest rate risk — This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investment resulting in changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The City's investment policies specifically address the City's desire to limit interest rate risk, but do not set specific guidelines for measurement of this risk. 47 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Note 4 CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows: 48 _ r Beginning „ Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance Governmental activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $ 15,981,364 $ - $ - $ 15,981,364 Easements - . 111,000 - 111,000 Construction in progress 25,181,400 11,325,347 (3,200,693) 33,306,054 Total capital assets not being depreciated 41,162,764 11,436,347. (3,200,693) 49,398,418 Capital assets being depreciated: , Land` improvements 22,550,059 - - 22,550,059 Buildings and structures 41;284,999 16,046 - 41,301,045 Furniture and Ioffice equipment : 3,590,578 35,246 - 3,625,824 Vehicles,and equipment 13,953;945 1,578,225 (945,099) 14,587,071 Infrastructure 78,173,201 2,884,797 (452,033) 80,605,965 Parks 15,349,999 218,704 (181,814) 15,386,889 Total capital assets being depreciated 174,902,781 4,733;018 (1,578;946) 178,056,853 t. Less.accumulated depreciation-for: Land improvements (13,116,499) (784,866) - (13,901,365) Buildings and structures (11,888,134)` (1,279,949) - (13,168,083) Furniture and office equipment (1;617,727) - (310,276) - (1,928,003) Vehicles and equipment. (81507,223) (1,149,163) 933,243 (8,723,143) Infrastructure (46,034,653) (2,118,864) 449,151 (47,704,366) Parks (6,763,565) (580,611) 118,144 (7,225,932) Total accumulated depreciation (87,927,801) (6,223,629) 1,500,538 (92,650,892) Total capital assets being depreciated, net 86,974,980' (1,490,611) '(78,408) 85,405,961 Governmental activities capital assets, net $128,137,744 $ . 9,945,736 $ (3,279,101) $134,804,379 48 _ r CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Business -type activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land Construction in progress Total capital assets not being depreciated Capital assets being depreciated: Land improvements & golf course Buildings and structures Furniture and office equipment Vehicles and equipment Utility infrastructure Lease property capital lease Total capital assets being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Land improvements & golf course Buildings and structures Furniture and office equipment Vehicles and equipment Utility infrastructure Lease property capital lease Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets being depreciated, net Beginning (316,231) (10,815,771) Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance (29,769,716) (2,147,540) (468,580) $ 1,088,965 $ - $ - $ 1,088,965 5,449,859 14,976,867 (5,644,955) 14,781,771 6,538,824 14,976,867 (5,644,955) 15,870,736 8,353,376 100,163 - 8,453,539 16,424,628 2,795,043 (14,950) 19,204,721 153,303 - - 153,303 6,064,738 215,080 (155,347) 6,124,471 83,256,076 2,980,084 - 86,236,160 468,580 - - 468,580 114,720,701 6,090,370 (170,297) 120,640,774 (4,944,623) (316,231) (10,815,771) (637,328) (121,375) (5,117) (3,494,984) (470,247) (29,769,716) (2,147,540) (468,580) (49,615,049) (3,576,463) 65,105,652 2,513,907 - (5,260,854) 5,985 (11,447,114) - (126,492) 148,213 (3,817,018) - (31,917,256) - (468,580) 154,198 (53,037,314) (16,099) 67,603,460 Business -type activities capital assets, net $ 71,644,476 $ 17,490,774 $ (5,661,054) $ 83,474,196 49 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Depreciation expense was charged to functions /programs of the primary government as follows: Go%mmental activities: Contract General govemment $ 542,513 Public safety Commitment 986,576 Public works $ 2,874,482 2,846,773 Parks W 44th Street 1,847,767 Total depreciation expense - governmental activities $ 6,223,629 4,279,528 188,284 Business -type activities: Energy Efficiency Upgrades 701,098 Utilities $ 2,319,927 Liquor. 157,700 67,398 Aquatic Center 449,000 194,456 Golf Course Raw Water Well #2 to WTP #6 412,683 Arena 11 -1 PW 350, 633 Art, Center 1,496,937 24,661 Edinborough Park 160,200 Centennial Lakes _ 46,505 Total depreciation expense - .business -type activities $ 3;576,463 CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS At December 31, 2011, the City had construction project contracts in progress. The commitments related to the remaining contract balance's are summarized as follows: 50 Contract Remaining Project # Project Description Amount Commitment 10 -3 Eng W 70th Street $ 2,874,482 $ 163,197 11 -7 Eng W 44th Street 2,368,005 107,535 11 -5 Eng . Minnehaha Woods 4,279,528 188,284 Various Energy Efficiency Upgrades 701,098 2,672 11 -2 PK Flowrider 412,700 157,700 10- 13:Eng Gleason Water Tower 449,000 144,700 11 -3 PW Raw Water Well #2 to WTP #6 919,219 671,676 11 -1 PW New Treatment Plant #6 5,896,179 1,496,937 $ 2,932,701 50 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Note 5 LONG -TERM DEBT The City has five types of bonded debt outstanding at December 31, 2011: tax increment bonds, general obligation bonds, permanent improvement revolving bonds, public project revenue bonds and G.O. revenue bonds. The first type of bond is payable solely from tax increment monies with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The second type is payable from general property taxes: The third type is payable solely from special assessments with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes..The fourth type is payable solely from . annual appropriation lease payments received from the City of Edina pursuant to a lease, between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City. The fifth type,is payable primarily from enterprise revenue with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The reporting entity's long -term debt is segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be repaid from business -type activities. GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES As of December 31, 2011, the governmental long -term bonded debt of the financial reporting entity consisted of the following: 2/1/2016 1,460,000 695,000 3.60 -4.00% 5/24/2007 211/2019 5,870,000 4,840,000 Final 8/28/2008 2/1/2020 7,755,000 Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable 2,305,000 Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/11 Tax Increment Bonds: 20, 710, 000 18, 260, 000 3.50 -4.13% Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2002B 3.00% 8/5/2002 2/1/2012 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2005D 3.00 -3.40% 7/19/2005 2/1/2013 3,505,000 1,080,000 Total Tax Increment Bonds 6,125,000 4,905,000 2,480,000 General Obligation Bonds: General Obligation - Park & Recreation Refunding, 2005A 3.50 -4.00% 7/19/2005 2/1/2017 5,375,000 3,195,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2007A 4.00 - 4.25% 5/24/2007 2/1/2028 5,865,000 5,255,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2009A 3.00 -4.40% 4/29/2009 2/1/2030 14,000,000 13,490,000 General Obligation - Equipment Certificates, 2009B 2.00 -3.00% 4/29/2009 1/1/2012 230,000 80,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2010A 2.00 -4.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2021 8,285,000 7,530,000 General Obligation - Equipment Certificates, 2010B 2.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2013 230,000 150,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 33,985,000 29,700,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2005E Permanent improvement Revolving, 2007C Permanent improvement Revolving, 2008B Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2010B Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2011A Total PIR Bonds Public Project Revenue Bonds: Public Project Revenue, Series 2005 Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A Public Project Revenue, Series 2009B Total Public Project Revenue Bonds Total bonded indebtedness - governmental activities 3.00 -3.75% 9/13/2005 2/1/2016 1,460,000 695,000 3.60 -4.00% 5/24/2007 211/2019 5,870,000 4,840,000 3.00 -4.00% 8/28/2008 2/1/2020 7,755,000 7,100,000 2.00 -3.00% 11/18/2010 211/2022 2,305,000 2,305,000 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 211/2023 3,320,000 3,320,000 20, 710, 000 18, 260, 000 3.50 -4.13% 9/13/2005 5/1/2026 5,425,000 4,440,000 2.10 -4.55% 11/24/2009 2/1/2030 2,595,000 2,595,000 1.95 -5.80% 11/24/2009 2/1/2030 6,125,000 6,125,000 51 14,145,000 13,160,000 $ 73,745,000 $ 63,600,000 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 BUSINESS -TYPE ACTIVITIES Final Interest_. Issue Maturity Original Payable Rates . Date Date Issue 12/31/11 Revenue Bonds: Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B 2.00 - 3.00 %' 4/29/2009 1/1/2013 $ 2,010,000 $ 1,190,000 Recreational Facility, Bonds, Series 2009C 2.00- 4.00% 12/10/2009 2/1/2030 2,440,000 2,360,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2003C 1.10= 3:55% 3%1/2003 2/1/2013 3,200,000 730,000 Utility ReJeriue Bonds, Series 20078 4.00%,: 5/24/2007 2/1/2017 8,210,000 5,250,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A 3.00- 4.25% 8/28/2008. 2/1/2019 13,985,000 11,090,000 utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00- 3.00 % ' . 10/27/2011 2/1/2022 11,230,000 11,230,000 Total.Revenue Bonds 41,075,000 31,850,000• Total bonded indebtedness - business -type activities $ 41,075,000 $ 31,850,000 Annual debt service requirements to maturity forrthe City's bonds are as follows: Governmental Activities Tax General Public Improvement YearEnding Increment, Bonds _ Obligation Bonds. Revolving Bonds December 31. Principal . Interest Principal','. '' Interest Principal Interest 2012 $ _1,930,000 $ 48,445• $_ 2,020,006 •1 1;097,868 $ 1,375,000 $ 557,514 2013 550,000 9,350 2,000,000 1,030,105 1,625,000 527,869 2014 - - ,• , 1198,5,000 957,899 1,970,000 471,581 2015 - - 2,080,000 882,868 2,025,000 408,772 2016 - - 2;145,000 804,168 2,090,000 342,931 2017 -2021 - - 9;390,000 2;934,767 8,190,000 730,523 2022 -2026 - - 5;595,000 1,550,449 985,000 25,875 2027 -2031 363,109 - Total $ 2,480,000 $ 57,795 $ 29,7001000 $ 9;621,233 $ 18,260,000 $ 3,065,065 Governmental Activities Business -type Activities Public Project Revenue Year Ending, Revenue Bonds.' Bonds December 31 Principal Interest Principal Interest 2012 $ 345,000 $ 565,388 $ 2,880,000 $ 916,990 2013 595,000 551,251 3,956,000 874,136 2014 615,000 532,811 3,380,000 763,275 2015 630,000 512,211 3,480,000 654,500 2016 650,000 489,524 3,605,000 537,963 2017 -2021 3,590;000 2,034,566 12,005,000 1,202,145 2022 -2026 4,346,000 1,163,288 1,920,000 212,725 2027 -2031 2,395,000 263,913 630,000 51,400 Total $ 13,160,000 $ 6,112,952 $ 31,850,000 $ 5,213,134 52 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 CHANGE IN LONG -TERM LIABILITIES Long -term liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2011, was as follows: During 2011 the City issued $14,550,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2011A to finance various street and utility infrastructure improvement projects. The City anticipates that utility revenues and special assessments to benefited properties will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. 53 Beginning Ending Due Within Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year Governmental activities: Bonds payable: Tax increment $ 3,320,000 $ $ (840,000) $ 2,480,000 $ 1,930,000 General obligation 31,800,000 (2,100,000) 29,700,000 2,020,000 PIR 16,270,000 3,320,000 (1,330,000) 18,260,000 1,375,000 Public project revenue 13,370,000 - (210,000) 13,160,000 345,000 Less deferred amounts: Discount on bonds (292,182) - 28,170 (264,012) - Premums 977,544 108,097 (97,740) 987,901 - Total bonds payable 65,445,362 3,428,097 (4,549,570) 64,323,889 5,670,000 Compensated absences 3,644,993 1,931,651 (1,748,970) 3,827,674 1,531,070 Governmental activity Long -term liabilities $ 69,090,355 $ 5,359,748 $ (6,298,540) $ 68,151,563 $ 7,201,070 Business -type activities: Bonds payable: Revenue bonds $ 23,375,000 $ 11,230,000 $ (2,755,000) $ 31,850,000 $ 2,880,000 Less deferred amounts: Discount on bonds (9,972) - 3,699 (6,273) - Prerriums 200,732 360,448 (36,080) 525,100 - Total bonds payable 23,565,760 11,590,448 (2,787,381) 32,368,827 2,880,000 Compensated absences 978,085 226,460 (353,682) 850,863 340,344 Business -type activity Long -term liabilities $ 24,543,845 $ 11,816,908 $ (3,141,063) $ 33,219,690 $ 3,220,344 For governmental activities, compensated absences are generally liquidated by the general fund. During 2011 the City issued $14,550,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2011A to finance various street and utility infrastructure improvement projects. The City anticipates that utility revenues and special assessments to benefited properties will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. 53 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 REVENUE PLEDGED Future revenue pledged for the payment of long -term debt is as follows: 4 Revenue Pledged Current Year % of Total Remaining Principal Pledged Debt Term of Principal and Interest Revenue Bond Issue Use of Proceeds Type Service Fledge and Interest Paid Received 2009B Recreational Facility Bonds Fool improvement' Fool 100% 2009 =2017 $ 638,250 $ 140,950 $ 913,383 2009B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf course improvement Golf 100% 2009 -2013 607,150 294,700 3,281,225 2009C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2010 -2030 3,306,600 164,400 1,315,435 2003C Utility " Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2003 -2013 755,913 376,248 15,871,102 2007B Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure" Utility 100% 2007 -2017 5,904,000 985,200 15,871,102 2008A Utility Revenue Bonds , Utility infrastructure Unity 100% 2008 -2019 12,942,181 1,601,838 15,871,102 2011A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Unity 100 %0, 2012 -2022 12,909,039 - 15,871,102 Note '6 LEGAL DEBT MARGIN The City is subject to:a statutory limitation by,the State of Minnesota for bonded indebtedness payable principally from property taxes. The City of Edina's +aeg`al :debt margin for 2011 is computed as follows: Market'.Value (after fiscal disparities) Debt Limit (3 %•of Market.Value) Amount of debt applicable to debt limit: Total bonded debt , Less: Tax increment bonds Public improvement revolving bonds Revenue bonds Total debt applicable to debt limit Legal debt margin 54 December 31, 2011 $ 9,431,940,900 $ 282,958,227 $ 95,450,000 (2,480,000) (18,260,000) (31, 850, 000) $ 42, 860, 000 $ 240,098,227 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Note 7 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE A. PLAN DESCRIPTION All full -time and certain part-time employees of the City of Edina are covered by defined benefit plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the General.Employees�Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) which-are cost - sharing, multiple - employer retirement plans. These plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Chapters 353 and 356. GERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. All police officers, firefighters and peace officers who qualify for membership by statute are covered by the PEPFF. PERA provides retirement benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to survivors upon death of eligible members. Benefits are established by State Statute, and vest after three years of credited service. The defined retirement benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERA's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step -rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2% of average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 2.7% for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2% of average salary for each of the first 10 years and 1.7% for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7% of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7% for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For PEPFF members, the annuity accrual rate is 3.0% for each year of service.. For all PEPFF and GERF members hired prior to July 1, 1989 whose annuity is calculated using Method 1, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90. Normal retirement age is 55 for PEPFF and 65 for Basic and Coordinated members hired prior to July 1, 1989. Normal retirement age is the age for unreduced;Social Security benefits capped at 66 for Coordinated members hired on orr after July,1, 1989. A reduced retirement annuity is also available to eligible members seeking early retirement. There are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A single -life annuity is a lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree — no survivor annuity is payable. There are, also various types of joint and survivor annuity options available which will be payable over joint lives. Members may also leave their contributions in the fund upon termination of public service in order to qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refunds of contributions are available at any time to members who leave public service, but before retirement benefits begin. 55 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 The benefit provisions stated in the previous paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not,receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. PERA issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for GERF and PEPFF. That report may be obtained on the internet at.www.mnpera.org, by writing to PERA.at 60 Empire Drive #200, St. Paul, Min6esota,,55103 -2088 or by calling (651) 296 =7460 or 1- 800- 652 -9026. Minnesota Statutes.Chapter,353 sets :the rates for employer and employee contributions These statutes are,.established and amended by the state legislature. The City makes annual contributions to the pension plans:equal to the amount required by state statutes. GERF,Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 9A % and 6:25 %°, respectively ;. of their covered salary.J6 2011. PEPFF members were' required to, contribute 9.6% of their covered salary in 2011. The City of Edina is required to.contribute:the following percentages of annual covered payroll: 11.78% for Basic Plan members; 7.25 %.for Coordinated;Plan members, and. 14:4% for PEPFF members. The City's contributions to the Public Employees Retirement "Fund for the years ending December 31, 2011,.2010, and 2009 were $1,000,753; $951,791, and $930,938, respectively,. The.City,'s contributions to`:the Public-Employees Police and Fire Fund for the years :ending December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 were $1,024,566, $920,988, and $941,561, respectively: The City's contributions" -were equal to the contractually required contributions for each year as set by state statute. . Note 8 OTHER POST- EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN A. Plan Description The City provides post - employment insurance benefits to. certain eligible employees through City's, Othee Post- Employment Benefits Plan, a single - employer defined benefit plan administered by the City. All post - employment benefits are based on contractual agreements with employee groups. These- contractual agreements do not include any specific contribution or funding requirements. These benefits are summarized, as follows: Post - Employment Insurance Benefits — All retirees of the City have the option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the City from the, time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for, Medicare. For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full premium to continue coverage for medical and dental insurance. 56 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree. Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an "implicit rate subsidy." This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable- premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool ;with the City's younger and statistically healthier active employees. B. Funding Policy The required contribution is based on projected pay -as- you -go financing requirements, with additional amounts to pre -fund benefits as determined annually by the City. Historically the City has chosen pay -as- you -go financing for OPEB, liquidated by all funds that employ full -time employees on a pro -rata basis. C. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The City's annual -OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on annual required contributions (ARC) of the City, an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The ARC represents a level funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the City's annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the changes in the City's net OPEB obligation to the plan: Annual required contribution $ 314,628 Interest on net OPEB obligation 36,721 Adjustment to annual required contribution (29,559) Annual OPEB cost (expense) 321,790 Contributions made (110,471) Increase in, net OPEB obligation 211,319 Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year 816,026 Net OPEB obligation - end of year $ 1,627,345 The City's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the past four years are as follows: Percentage of Fiscal Annual Employer Annual OPEB Net OPEB Year Ended OPEB Cost Contribution Cost Contributed Obligation December 31, 2009 $ 443,317 $ 167,209 December 31, 2010 325,401 92,987 December 31, 2011 321,790 110,471 57 37.7% $ 583,612 28.6% 816,026 34.3% 1,027,345 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 D. Funded Status and Funding Progress As of January 1, 2010, the most recent actuarial .valuation date, the plan was zero percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $2,966,250, and the actuarial value of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $2,966,250. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $17,786,616, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 16.7 percent. Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and ARCs of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule of Funding Progress immediately following the notes to the basic financial statements presents multi- year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. E. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long -term perspective of the calculations. In the January 1, 2010 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included: a 4.5 percent investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses) based on the City's own investments; an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 9.0 percent initially, reduced by decrements to an ultimate rate of 5.0 percent after twelve years. The UAAL is being amortized as a level percentage of payroll. The remaining amortization period at January 1, 2010 was 30 years on a "closed" basis. A.] CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Note 9 INTERFUND RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES, AND TRANSFERS The composition of due from other funds and due to other funds account balances as of December 31, 2011, is as follows: Receivable Fund General Police Special Revenue Braemar Memorial Special Revenue Liquor Aquatic Center Arena Art Center Centennial Lakes Total Payable Fund HRA Debt Service General CDBG Construction Utility Debt Service Golf Course Debt Service Utility Utility Amount $ 64,899 43,277 346,100 82,000 593,597 615,113 277,115 84,247 20,868 129,731 6,703 $2,263,650 The composition of advances to other funds and advances from other funds account balances as of December 31, 2011, is as follows: Receivable Fund Aquatic Center Total Payable Fund Amount Golf Course $1,000,000 The City's interfund receivables and payables eliminate what would have been negative cash balances. 59 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Transfer In: Debt Nonmajor General Service Construction Golf Course Business -type Total Transfer out: General Fund $ - $1,328,530 $ 1,155,000 $ - $ - $ 2,483,530 HRA Fund - 934,359 - - - 934,359 Construction Fund - - - - 320,894 320,894 Communications Fund 1,182,680 - - - - 1,182,680 Utilities Fund - - 100,000 - - 100,000 Liquor Fund 765;100 - 150,000 100,000 240,000 1,255,100 Nonmajor Business -type - - - - 4,129,693 4,129,693 $1,947,780 $ 2,2621`889 $ 1,405,000 $ 100,000 $ 4,690,587 $10,406,256 Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit from services provided by,another fund.. Some of the City's interfund transfers fall under that category. Non - routine transfers include the'following: 1. The liquor fund transferred $765,100, $100,000,.$160,000 and $80,000 to the general fund, golf course fund, art center,;and arenafunds, respectively,'to, subsidize operations. 2. The construction fU4 d, transferred $15,000, 62 $136;9 and $168,932 to the art center, arena, and Edinborough %Centennial funds, respectively, to subsidize capital _ improvements to those`facilities.; 3. The HRA fund transferred $934,359 of tax increment revenues to the debt service fund to pay principal and interest on outstanding tax increment debt. 4. The utilities fund and liquor fund transferred $100,000 and'$150;000, respectively, to the construction fund to fund the capita lii nprovement program, as planned in the 2011 budget. 5. The general•,fund transferred $1,328,530 to the debt service fund; $950,000 to call a portion of the Series 2009A G.O. Bond and.$378,530 to fund a portion of 2012 public works debt. 6. The general fund transferred $1,155,000 of•the 2010 unreserved and undesignated fund balance to the construction fund. $700,000 to fund various projects within the construction fund, $155,000 to prepay the special assessment for Pamela Park, and $300,000 for human resources and technology improvements: 7. The communications fund transferred $1,182,680 to the general fund as a result of the funds being consolidated at year end 2011. 8. The Edinborough /Centennial lakes fund transferred $2,636,318 and $1,493,375 to the Edinborough and Centennial lakes funds respectively due to the creation of two new funds to account for each facility individually. We CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Note 10 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS The City of Edina is the administering authority for the following Tax Increment Districts: District number 1202 (Grandview Commercial Area) is a redevelopment district established in 1984 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2010. Although the main district is decertified, the City will continue to receive increments from a sub- district until the outstanding debt is retired. The debt is scheduled to mature in 20.12. District number 1203 (Southeast Edina Redevelopment District - Centennial Lakes) is a redevelopment district established in 1988 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2016. District number 1207 (70th and Cahill Economic Development District) is an economic district established in 1990 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a decertification date of 2000. Increment previously collected is available for expenditures within the larger development district that includes the Wooddale — Valley View commercial area. Tax capacity and debt for this district is not included in the following schedule as county reports no longer indicate captured tax capacity for this district and no debt is outstanding. The following table reflects values as of December 31, 2011: Total bonds issued (general obligation) $ 9,637,555 $ 35,894,724 $ 45,532,279 Amounts redeemed 8,237,555 34,814,724 43,052,279 Outstanding bonds at December 31, 2011 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,080,000 $ 2,480,000 I. ,4 TIF #1202 TIF #1203 Total Original tax capacity $ 22,872 $ 229,691 $ 252,563 Current tax capacity 913,632 3,406,842 4,320,474 Tax capacity change 890,760 3,177,151 4,067,911 Captured tax capacity value: Retained captured tax capacity $ 890,760 $ 3,177,151 $ 4,067,911 Total bonds issued (general obligation) $ 9,637,555 $ 35,894,724 $ 45,532,279 Amounts redeemed 8,237,555 34,814,724 43,052,279 Outstanding bonds at December 31, 2011 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,080,000 $ 2,480,000 I. ,4 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Note 11 CONTINGENCIES A. RISK MANAGEMENT The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. Worker's compensation insurance is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). The City has a $10,000 deductible per occurrence, with a $500,000 annual maximum. Automobile and general liability coverage is provided through an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage and all claims are paid from the plan up to the annual maximum of $600,000. The City is not subject to a deductible for automobile or general liability coverage. Property coverage is also provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and all claims are paid for by the plan. The City has $2,500 - $25,000 deductibles per occurrence depending on claim type, with an annual maximum of $83,446,936. Police professional insurance coverage is provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and has a $10,000 deductible per occurrence, with a $500,000 annual maximum. Settlement claims have not exceeded insurance coverage for each of the past three years. There were not significant reductions in insurance coverage during 2011. B. LITIGATION The City attorney has indicated that existing and pending lawsuits, claims and other actions in which the City is a defendant are either covered by insurance; of an immaterial amount; or, in the judgment of the City attorney, remotely recoverable by plaintiffs. C. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in the form of grants. The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally requires compliance with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreements and is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any disallowed claims resulting from such audits could become a liability of the applicable fund. However, in the opinion of management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial position of the City at December 31, 2011. 62 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 D. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS The City's tax increment districts are subject to review by the State of Minnesota Office of the State Auditor (OSA). Any disallowed claims or misuse of tax increments could become a liability of the applicable fund. Management is not aware of any instances of noncompliance which would have a material effect on the financial statements. - Note 12 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATION As of December 31, 2011, the City of Edina had 4 series of Housing and Health Care Revenue Bonds, with an aggregate principal amount payable of $30,920,000. The bonds are payable solely from revenues of the respective organizations and do not constitute an indebtedness of the City, and are not a charge against its general credit or taxing power. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. Note 13 JOINT VENTURE The City is a participant with the City of Bloomington, the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan Airport Commission in a joint venture to construct and operate a facility to be used for the training of law enforcement officers and firefighters. The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Association (PSTF) is governed by a Board consisting of one representative from each Member. On dissolution of the Association, the Facility shall revert to the City of Edina, and all remaining assets shall be divided among the members based on the Cost Sharing Formula. In accordance with the joint venture agreement, each member of the association will share in the cost of the construction and operation based on the Cost Sharing Formula. The City's equity interest in the capital assets of the PSTF was $1,584,465. Complete financial statements for PSTF can be obtained from the City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. Note 14 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The City pays an annual membership fee to;the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility as part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the Police and Fire departments and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the City paid a total of $40,516 in membership fees to the PSTF: The City also pays an annual membership fee to the 1-494 Corridor Commission as part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the commissions and projects department and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the City paid a total of $11,383 in membership fees to the 1 -494 Corridor Commission. 63 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011 Note 15 FUND BALANCES During 2011, the City implemented the requirements of a new accounting pronouncement, GASB Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions." A. Classifications At December 31, 2011, a summary of the City's governmental fund balance classifications are as follows: $ 13,473,216 $ 16,190,129 $ 8,068,183 $ 10,186,483 $ 988,728 $ 48,906,739 B. Unassigned Fund Balance Policy The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned fund balance for the general fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned general fund balance of 42 % -47% of the subsequent year's budgeted property tax revenue. As of December 31, the City has $11,744,764 of unassigned fund balance in the general fund, or 54.6% of 2012 budgeted property tax revenue. This amount is $1,642,395 above the goal range identified in the policy. Note 16 SUBSEQUENT EVENT The Braemar Golf Dome collapsed on February 10, 2012 as the result of a fire. The fire and collapse resulted in a total loss according to the City's insurance carrier. The City believes the incident will be fully covered by insurance, including the physical building and lost revenue. 64 Nonmajor General Fund HRA Fund Debt Service Construction Funds Total Nonspendable Prepaid items $ 10,871 $ $ $ $ $ 10,871 Restricted Park dedication 178,295 178,295 Tax increments - 16,190,129 - 16,190,129 Debt service - 8,068,183 8,068,183 Unspent bond proceeds - 2,087,548 2,087,548 Forfeitures - - 526,409 526,409 Grant funds - 128,983 128,983 Donations 333,336 333,336 Assigned Unrealized investment gains 8,217 - - 8,217 Compensated absences 1,531,069 - - 1,531,069 Construction commitments - 461,688 461,688 Special projects - 714,243 714,243 Equipment - 2,321,050 2,321,050 Construction - 4,601,954 - 4,601,954 Unassigned 11,744,764 - 11,744,764 $ 13,473,216 $ 16,190,129 $ 8,068,183 $ 10,186,483 $ 988,728 $ 48,906,739 B. Unassigned Fund Balance Policy The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned fund balance for the general fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned general fund balance of 42 % -47% of the subsequent year's budgeted property tax revenue. As of December 31, the City has $11,744,764 of unassigned fund balance in the general fund, or 54.6% of 2012 budgeted property tax revenue. This amount is $1,642,395 above the goal range identified in the policy. Note 16 SUBSEQUENT EVENT The Braemar Golf Dome collapsed on February 10, 2012 as the result of a fire. The fire and collapse resulted in a total loss according to the City's insurance carrier. The City believes the incident will be fully covered by insurance, including the physical building and lost revenue. 64 Required Supplementary Is Information CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Revenues: General property taxes: Current Penalties and interest Total general property taxes Licenses and permits: Intergovernmental: Federal: State: Municipal state aid Other State aid - police Health programs Total intergovernmental Charges for services: City Clerk Planning Department Housing Foundation Contract HRA Services . Police Department Fire Department Ambulance fees Health Department Building Department Engineering Park Registration Senior Center Otherfees 50th & France Assessment Charges to other funds Total charges for services Fines and forfeits Miscellaneous: Rental of property Investment income Donations Other Total miscellaneous Total revenues Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 20,677,000 12,000 20,689,000 2,309,490 36,000 195,000 51,000 355,000 120,000 757,000 6,000 27,500 26,000 22,000 200,000 30,000 1,545,000 7,700 25,000 180,000 98,000 98,000 4,000 69,000 395,604 2,733,804 975,000 325,000 115,919 12,000 6,000 458,919 27,923,213 65 $ 20,677,000 12,000 20,689,000 2011 Actual Amounts $ 20,589,087 18,558 20,607,645 Variance with Final Budget - Over (Under) $ (87,913) 6,558 (81,355) 2,309,490 2,688,324 378,834 36,000 195,000 51,000 355,000 120,000 757,000 6,000 27,500 26,000 22,000 200,000 30,000 1,545,000 7,700 25,000 180,000 98,000 98,000 4,000 69,000 395,604 2,733,804 975,000 325,000 115,919 12,000 6,000 458,919 27,923,213 68,241 195,000 175,777 330,944 148,764 918,726 9,630 33,125 29,921 20,230 360,907 26,549 1,692,232 10,852 3,462 265,493 104,324 84,616 1,921 69,000 395,604 3,107,866 1,128, 328 538,269 59,849 38,815 636,933 29,087,822 32,241 124,777 (24,056) 28,764 161,726 3,630 5,625 3,921 (1,770) 160,907 (3,451) 147,232 3,152 (21,538) 85,493 6,324 (13,384) (2,079) 374,062 153,328 213,269 (56,070) 26,815 (6,000) 178,014 1,164, 609 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Expenditures: General government: Mayor and Council: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total mayor and council Administration: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total administration Planning: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total planning Finance: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total finance Election: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities,. Central services Total election Assessing`. Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total assessing Legal and court services: Current: Contractual services Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 48,106 12,100 1,225 28,008 •89,439 912,370 162,000 3,100 75,108 1,152,578 - 385,053 36;950 41500 51,288. 47.7;791. 526;618 105,650 3,400 59,976 695,644 153,462 23,300. 17,000 15,948 209,7.10 673,269 112 ;100 2,900 64,920 853,189 $ 48,106 12,100 1,225 28,008 89,439 912;370 162,000 3,100 75,108 1,152,578 385,053 36,950 4,500 51,288 477,791 526,618 105,650 3,400 59;976 695,644 153,462 23,300 17,000 15,948 209 710 673,269 112,100 2,900 64;920 853,189 2011 Actual Amounts $ 45,813 13,163 2,076 25,452 86,504 858,794 209,726 2,320 68,362 1,139,202 380,416 39,254 1,645 46,555 467,870 488,556 99,993 4,423 54,433 647,405 102,605 16,679 10,984 14,460 144,728 603,369 93,335 1,101 59,482 757,287 388,000 388,000 343,594 .. Variance with Final Budget - Under (Over) $ 2,293 (1,063) (85,1). 2,556 2,935 53,576.: (47,726) 780" 6,746_, 13,376 4`,637'�; (2,304) 2;855 4,733 9,921 38,062• 5,657,; (1;023) 5;543 48;239; 50,857,; 6,016 1;488 64;982 ` 69,900 18,765 ;1,799 5,438' 95.902 44,406 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Commissions and projects: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Total commissions and projects Total general government Public safety: Police protection: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total police protection Fire protection: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total fire protection Civil defense: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Total civil defense Animal Control: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total animal control Public health: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total public health Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 135,000 460,848 2,000 597,848 4,464,199 6,432,673 407,357 68,524 1,016,220 7,924,774 3,635,550 334,700 168,800 328,164 4,467,214 37,347 10,227 8,956 56,530 71,833 8,592 2,448 9,108 91,981 279,289 198,980 2,325 31,008 511,602 67 $ 135,000 460,848 2,000 597,848 4,464,199 6,432,673 407,357 68,524 1,016,220 7,924,774 3,635,550 334,700 168,800 328,164 4,467,214 37,347 10,227 8,956 56,530 71,833 . 8,592 2,448 9,108 91,981 279,289 198,980 2,325 31,008 511,602 2011 Actual Amounts $ 330,850 265,453 6,096 602,399 4,188,989 6,669,470 385,262 69,731 963,617 8,088,080 3,722,966 384,217 197,604 314,506 4,619,293 37,806 9,666 8,804 56,276 73,429 13,329 2,545 8,682 97,985 281,236 187,446 225 28,504 497,411 Variance with Final Budget - Under (Over) $ (195,850) 195,395 (4,096) (4,551) 275,210 (236,797) 22,095 (1,207) 52,603 (163,306) (87,416) (49,517) (28,804) 13,658 (152,079) (459) 561 152 254 (1,596) (4,737) (97) 426 (6,004) (1,947) 11,534 2,100 2,504 14,191 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Inspections: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total inspections Total public safety Public works: Administration: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total administration Engineering: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total engineering Street maintenance: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total street maintenance Total public works Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 904,287 75,989 8,200 101,016 1,089,492 $ 904,287 75,989 8,200 101,016 1,089,492 2011 Actual Amounts Variance with Final Budget - Under (Over) $ 915,071 $ (10,784) 112,875 (36,886) 9,374 (1,174) 93,752 7,264 1,131,072 (41,580) 14,141,593 14,141,593 14,490,117 (348,524) 196,742 6,800 500 24,912 228,954 860,555 74,250 16,700 100,740 1,052,245 2,272,327 757,000 1,001,650 913,932 4,944,909 6,226,108 68 196,742 6,800 500 24,912 228,954 860,555 74,250 16,700 100,740 1,052,245 2,272,327 757,000 1,001,650 913,932 4,944,909 6,226,108 167,593 5,747 287 23,015 196,642 889,220 30,786 10,599 96,234 1,026,839 1,954,833 737,307 911,674 928,988 4,532,802 5,756,283 29,149 1,053 213 1,897 32,312 (28,665; 43,464 6,101 4,506 25,406 317,494 19,693 89,976 (15,056; 412.107 469,825 -ITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 3UDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) =or The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Parks: Administration: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total administration Recreation: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Total recreation Maintenance: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total maintenance Total parks Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfer from other funds Transfer to other funds Total financing sources (uses) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 69 Variance with 2011 Final Budget - Budgeted Amounts Actual Under Original Final Amounts (Over) $ 664,931 $ 664,931 $ 657,592 $ 7,339 28,604 28,604 20,434 8,170 3,045 3,045 2,447 598 82,836 82,836 75,169 7,667 779,416 779,416 755,642 23,774 187,127 187,127 159,843 27,284 180,887 180;887 127,526 53,361 52,688 52,688 41;620 11,068 420,702 420,702 328,989 91,713 1,602,414 1,602,414 1,572,392 30,022 529,171 529,171 379,545 149,626 203,602 203,602 163,001 40,601 321,108 321,108 323,108 (2,000) 2,656,295 2,656,295 2,438,046 218,249 3,856,413 3,856,413 3,522,677 333,736 28,688,313 28,688,313 27,958,066 730,247 (765,100) (765,100) 1,129,756 1,894,856 765,100 1,752,879 1,947,780 194,901 - (2,483,530) (2,483,530) - 765,100 (730,651) (535,750) 194,901 $ - $ (1,495,751) 594,006 $ 2,089,757 12,879,210 $ 13;473,216 69 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - HRA FUND For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Revenues: Tax increment collections Investment income Total revenues Expenditures: Personal services Contractual services Capital outlay Total expenditures Other financing uses: Transfers out Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 (934,359) (934,359) (934,359) $ (1,535,114) $ (1,535,114) 70 2,865,432 $ 4,400,546 13,324,697 $ 16,190,129 Variance with Final budget - Budgeted Amounts Actual Over Original Final Amounts (Under) $ 3,972,190 $ 3,972,190 $ 4,083,345 $ 111,155 122,000 122,000 319,825 197,825 4,094,190 4,094,190 4,403,170 308,980 20,771 20,771 20,230 (541) 674,174 674,174 555,966 (118,208) 4,000,000 4,000,000 27,183 (3,972,817) 4,694,945 4,694,945 603,379 (4,091,566) (934,359) (934,359) (934,359) $ (1,535,114) $ (1,535,114) 70 2,865,432 $ 4,400,546 13,324,697 $ 16,190,129 '.ITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION )THER POST - EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS -or The Year Ended December 31, 2011 71 Unfunded Unfunded Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability as a Valuation Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered Percentage of Date Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll Payroll January 1, 2008 $ 4,638,477 $ - $ 4,638,477 0.0% $ 17,071,318 27.2% January 1, 2010 $ 2,966,250 $ - $ 2,966,250 0.0% $ 17,786,616 16.7% 71 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2011 Note A LEGAL COMPLIANCE — BUDGETS The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements: 1. The City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. 2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 3. The budget is legally enacted by the passage of a resolution by the City Council. 4. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year. 5. Budgets for the General Fund, HRA, debt service, construction, CDBG, communications, police special revenue, and Braemar memorial funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). 6. The City Manager may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between departments. 7. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by Council- approved supplemental appropriations and budget transfers. 8. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year -end. 72 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2011 Note B EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS The General Fund budget is legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund. The following is a listing of General Fund departments whose expenditures exceed budget appropriations. General Fund General Government Commisions and projects Public Safety Police protection Fire protection Animal control Inspections Final Over Budget Actual Budget $ 597,848 $ 602,399 $ 4,551 7,924,774 8,088,080 163,306 4,467,214 4,619,293 152,079 91,981 97,985 6,004 1,089,492 1,131, 072 41,580 Excess expenditures in the commissions and projects department are due to employee severance payments made during the year and are funded by available general fund balance assigned for compensated absences. Excess expenditures in the police protection, fire protection, and animal control departments are due to labor contracts that were settled after the budget was set for higher than expected amounts. These expenditures are funded by available general fund balance. Excess expenditures in the inspections department are due to higher than anticipated permit applications during the year and are funded by the additional permit revenue received. 73 Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Special Revenue Funds A Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. The following are nonmajor special revenue funds: Community Development Block Grant Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. Communications Fund This fund was established to account for funds received from the franchise fee of the local cable television service. The fund was consolidated into the General Fund on December 31, 2011. Police Special Revenue Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received for specific purposes within the police department, including E -911 and forfeiture funds. Braemar Memorial Fund - This fund was established to account for funds donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing the Braemar golf course with equipment and amenities that might not otherwise be affordable or viewed as a necessity to the golf course. 75 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS December 31, 2011 Community Development Police Block Grant Communication Special Revenue Assets Total Nonmajor Braemar Special Revenue Memorial Funds Cash and cash equivalents $ - $ - $ - $ 5,053 $ 5,053 Unrestricted investments - - 244,838 244,782 489,620 Accrued interest receivable - - 468 401 869 Accounts receivable - - - 1,100 1,100 Due from other funds - - 389,377 82,000 471,377 Due from other governments 82,000 - 23,781 - 105,781 Total assets $ 82,000 $ - $ 658,464 $ 333,336 $ 1,073,800 Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable Due to other funds Total liabilities Fund balance: Restricted Total fund balance Total liabilities and fund balance 82,000 _ 82,000 $ 3,072 $ - $ 3,072 - - 82,000 - 3,072 - 85,072 - - 655,392 333,336 988,728 - - 655,392 333,336 988,728 $ 82,000 $ - $ 658,464 $ 333,336 $ 1,073,800 76 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Revenues: Franchise fees Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Investment income Other Total revenues Expenditures: Current: General government Public safety Parks Total expenditures Revenues over expenditures Other financing uses: Transfers out Total other financing uses Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 Community Total Nonmajor Development Police Braemar Special Revenue Block Grant Communication Special Revenue Memorial Funds $ - $ 722,160 $ - $ - $ 722,160 108,067 - 63,364 - 171,431 - 15,413 - - 15,413 - I - 115,098 - 115,098 57,111 944 744 58,799 - 44,665 - 28,743 73,408 108,067 839,349 179,406 29,487 1,156,309 108,067 775,532 - - 883,599 - - 103,973 - 103,973 - - - 6,092 6,092 108,067 775,532 103,973 6,092 993,664 63,817 75,433 23,395 162,645 (1,182,680) (1,182,680) (1,182,680) - - (1,182,680) (1,118,863) 75,433 23,395 (1,020,035) - 1,118,863 579,959 309,941 2,008,763 77 655,392 $ 333,336 $ 988,728 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Variance with Final budget -; Budgeted Amounts Actual Over Original Final Amounts (Under) Revenues: Intergovernmental $ 161,303 $ 161,303 $ 108,067 $ (53,236) Expenditures: Current: Contractual services 161,303 161,303 108,067 (53,236) Net increase in fund balance $ Fund balance - January 1 - { „v Fund balance - December 31 $ - r. A 78 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - COMMUNICATIONS SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Expenditures: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Capital outlay Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing uses: Transfers out Net increase in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 367,973 367,973 356,009 (11,964) Variance with 326,070 308,795 (17,275) 38,500 Final budget - 29,544 Budgeted Amounts Actual Over 25,105 Original Final Amounts (Under) ,Revenues: 807,755 807,755 775,532 (32,223) Franchise fees $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 722,160 $ 72,160 Charges for services - - 15,4:13 15,413 Investment income 24,000 24,000 57,111 33,111 Other 66,500 66,500 44,665 (21,835) Total revenues 740,500 740,500 839,349 98,849 Expenditures: Current: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Capital outlay Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing uses: Transfers out Net increase in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 367,973 367,973 356,009 (11,964) 326,070 326,070 308,795 (17,275) 38,500 38,500 29,544 (8,956) 61,212 61,212 25,105 (36,107) 14,000 14,000 56,079 42,079 807,755 807,755 775,532 (32,223) (67,255) (67,255) 63,817 131,072 (987,779) (1,182,680) (194,901) $ (67,255) $ (1,055,034) (1,118,863) $ (63,829) 79 1,118,863 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Revenues: Intergovernmental Fines and forfeiture Investment income Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Contractual services Commodities Capital outlay Total expenditures Net increase in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 Budgeted Amounts Actual Original Final Amounts $ 104,760 $ 104,760 $ 63,364 52,103 52,103 115,098 nnn nnn n A A Variance with Final budget - Over (Under) $ (41,396; 62,995 344 21,943 86,695 86,695 36,063 (50,632; 2,133 2,133 28,485 26,352 52,764 52,764 39,425 (13,339; 141,592 141,592 103,973 (37,619; $ 15,871 $ 15,871 75,433 $ 59,562 :e 579,959 $ 655,392 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - BRAEMAR MEMORIAL SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Expenditures: Current: Contractual services Commodities Capital outlay Total expenditures Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 7,500 7,500 - (7,500) - - 251 Variance with - - 5,841 5,841 7,500 7,500 6,092 Final budget - $ (4,200) $ (4,200) 23,395 Budgeted Amounts Actual Over Original Final Amounts (Under) Revenues: Investment income $ 300 $ 300 $ 744 $ 444 Donations 3,000 3,000 28,743 25,743 Total revenues 3,300 3,300 29,487 26,187 Expenditures: Current: Contractual services Commodities Capital outlay Total expenditures Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 7,500 7,500 - (7,500) - - 251 251 - - 5,841 5,841 7,500 7,500 6,092 (1,408) $ (4,200) $ (4,200) 23,395 $ 27,595 81 309,941 $ 333,336 This page left blank intentionally. 82 NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds account for the financing of self- supporting activities of governmental units which render services to the general public on a user charge basis. The following are nonmajor enterprise funds: Arena Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the Braemar Ice Arena. Art Center. Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the City's Art Center. Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund - This fund accounts for activities at two of the City's parks; Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Park. The fund was discontinued on December 31, 2011 due to the creation of two new funds to account for each facility individually. Edinborough Park Fund - This fund was created on December 31, 2011 to account for activities related to Edinborough Park. Centennial Lakes Park Fund - This fund was created on December 31, 2011 to account for activities related to Centennial Lakes Park. 83 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS December 31, 2011 Liabilities: Edinborough Current liabilities: Park Accounts payable Total Nonmajor 12,578 - 50,015 Art Centennial Edinborough Centennial Proprietary - 23,048 Arena Center Lakes Park Lakes Funds Assets 34,833 Due to other governments 3,245 740 - 9,309 1,011 Current assets: Unearned revenue - 8,095 - 30 10 8,135 Cash and cash equivalents $ 16,093 $ - $ - $ 16,571 $ 8,468 $ 41,132 Unrestricted investments - - - 1,333,541 1,333,541 2,667,082 Interest receivable - - - 6,483 6,483 12,966 Accounts receivable 112,097 - - 5,186 4,066 121,349 Due from other funds 20,868 129,731 - - 6,703 157,302 Inventory - 12,325 - - - 12,325 Total current assets 149,058 142,056 - 1,361,781 1,359,261 3,012,156 Noncurrent assets: 2,338,838 5,952 - 35,572 56,850 2,437,212 Total liabilities Deferred charges 25,354 - - - - 25,354 Net capital assets 4,431,707 222,688 - 1,409,653 258,360 6,322,408 Total noncurrent assets 4,457,061 222,688 - 1,409,653 258,360 6,347,762 Total assets 4,606,119 364,744 - 2,771,434 1,617,621 9,359,918 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable 40,342 12,578 - 50,015 11,999 114,934 Salaries payable 31,040 7,056 - 23,048 23,048 84,192 Accrued interest payable 34,833 - - - - 34,833 Due to other governments 3,245 740 - 9,309 1,011 14,305 Unearned revenue - 8,095 - 30 10 8,135 Compensated absences payable 36,157 1,745 - 17,142 31,328 86,372 Bonds payable - current 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Total current liabilities 245,617 30,214 - 99,544 67,396 442,771 Noncurrent liabilities: OPEB payable 12,301 3,335 - 9,858 9,858 35,352 Compensated absences 54,236 2,617 - 25,714 46,992 129,559 Bonds payable, net of unamortized discounts 2,272,301 - - - - 2,272,301 Total noncurrent liabilities 2,338,838 5,952 - 35,572 56,850 2,437,212 Total liabilities 2,584,455 36,166 - 135,116 124,246 2,879,983 Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 2,059,406 222,688 - 1,409,653 258,360 3,950,107 Unrestricted (37,742) 105,890 - 1,226,665 1,235,015 2,529,828 Total net assets $ 2,021,664 $ 328,578 $ - $ 2,636,318 $ 1,493,375 $ 6,479,935 84 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET ASSETS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 Edinborough Park Total Nonmajor Art Centennial Edinborough Centennial Proprietary Arena Center Lakes Park Lakes Funds Operating revenues: Sales - retail $ 2,000 $ 39,706 $ - $ - $ - $ 41,706 Sales - concessions 4,183 938 80,435 - - 85,556 Memberships 7,324 25,731 54,437 - - 87,492 ' Admissions 112,151 - 654,972 - - 767,123 Building rental 1,062,949 - 314,622 - - 1,377,571 Rental of equipment 2,407 - 116,823 - - 119,230 Greens,fees - - 179,615 - - 179,615 Class registration & other fees 124,421 384,968 478,889 - - 988,278 Total operating revenues 1,315,435 451,343 1,879,793. - - 3,646,571 Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 1,172 21,376 82,305 - - 104,853 Personal services 613,222 213,937 1,164,053 - - 1,991,212 Contractual services 593,432 276,069 463,522 - - 1,333,023 Commodities 89,989 42,966 289,641 - - 422,596 Central Services 40,553 36,163 93,062 - - 169,778 Depreciation 350,633 24,661 206,705 - - 581,999 Total operating expenses 1,689,001 615,172 2,299,288 - - 4,603,461 Operating loss (373,566) (163,829) (419,495) - - (956,890) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income 135 - 191,732 - - 191,867 Donations - 13,537 3,540 - - 17,077 Interest and fiscal charges (83,733) - - - - (83,733) Amortization of bond discount (722) - - - - (722) Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) (84,320) 13,537 195,272 - - 124,489 Income (loss) before transfers (457,886) (150,292) (224,223) - - (832,401) Transfers: Transfers in 216,962 175,000 168,932 2,636,318 1,493,375 4,690,587 Transfers out - - (4,129,693) - - (4,129,693) Total transfers 216,962 175;000 (3,960,761) 2,636,318 1,493,375 560,894 Change in net assets (240,924) 24,708 (4,184,984) 2,636,318 1,493,375 (271,507) Net assets - January 1 2,262,588 303,870 4,184,984 - - 6,751,442 Net assets - December 31 $ 2,021,664 $ 328,578 $ - $ 2,636,318 $ 1,493,375 $ 6,479;935 85 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 86 Edinborough Park Total Nonmajor Art Centennial Edinborough Centennial Proprietary Arena Center Lakes Park Lakes Funds Cash flows from operating activities: Receipts from customers and users $ 1,318,184 $ 451,576 $ 1,829,782 $ $ $ 3,599,542 Payment to suppliers (830,406) (377,308) (962,527) - (2,170,241) Payment to employees (609,136) (263,021) (1,202,781) (2,074,938) Donations received - 13,537 3,540 17,077 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (121,358) (175,216) (331,986) - (628,560) Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Transfer from other funds 80,000 160,000 - 16,571 15,171 271,742 Transfer to other funds - - (31,742) - - (31,742) Proceeds from interfund borrowing 80,000 140,000 - - 220,000 Payment of interfund borrowing (20,868) (129,731) (8,000) - (6,703) (165,302) Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities 139,132 170,269 (39,742) 16,571 8,468 294,698 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Transfer from other funds 136,962 15,000 168,932 - - 320,894 Acquisition of capital assets (264,408) (15,681) (197,597) - (477,686) Principal paid on bonds (80,000) - - (80,000) Interest paid on bonds (84,400) - - - (84,400) Net cash used in capital and related financing activities (291,846) (681) (28,665) (321,192) Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sales of investments 288,706 - 276,273 564,979 Interest received 135 123,726 123,861 Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities 288,841 399,999 688,840 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 14,769 (5,628) (394) 16,571 8,468 33,786 Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 1,324 5,628 394 - 7,346 Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $ 16,093 $ - $ - $ 16,571 $ 8,468 $ 41,132 Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Operating loss $ (373,566) $ (163,829) $ (419,495) $ - $ - $ (956,890) Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation 350,633 24,661 206,705 581,999 Donations - 13,537 3,540 17,077 Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in receivables 2,749 - (1,734) 1,015 Decrease (increase) in inventory - 754 754 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (106,869) (1,444) (35,498) (143,811) Increase (decrease) in salaries payable 776 (1,687) (3,840) (4,751) Increase (decrease) in due to other governments 1,609 (44) 1,501 3,066 Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue - 233 (48,277) - (48,044) Increase (decrease) in OPEB payable 2,464 645 3,798 - 6,907 Increase (decrease) in compensated absences 846 (48,042) (38,686) (85,882) Total adjustments 252,208 (11,387) 87,509 - 328,330 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ (121,358) $ (175,216) $ (331,986) $ $ $ (628,560) Noncash investing activities: Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments - - 74,241 74,241 Noncash noncapital financing activities: Transfer net assets to new fund (4,097,951) - (4,097,951) Transfer of net assets from old fund 2,619,747 1,478,204 4,097,951 86 FIDUCIARY FUNDS Agency Funds Agency funds are used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial capacity. The following are agency funds: Police Seizure Fund - This fund accounts for assets seized by the Police Department. Public Safety Training Facility - This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, which is a joint venture that the City has fiduciary responsibilities for. Payroll Fund - This fund accounts for assets withheld from employee paychecks that the City plans to remit to various third parties, including state & local governments, insurance providers, and others. 1 -494 Corridor Commission - This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the 1 -494 Corridor Commission, which is a joint venture that the City had fiduciary responsibilities for from 2009 -2011. 87 `i This page left blank intentionally. ,n 88 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AGENCYFUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2011 PAYROLL Assets: Cash Liabilities: Accounts payable 1 -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION Assets: Cash Liabilities: Due to other governmental units $ 30,867 $ 15,995,138 $ 15,999,089 $ 26,916 $ 30,867 $ 15,995,138 $ 15,999,089 $ 26,916 $ 110,051 $ 54,370 $ 164,421 $ - $ 110,051 $ 54,370 $ 164,421 $ - TOTALS - ALL AGENCY FUNDS Assets: Cash $ 171,159 $ 17,567,301 $ 17,680,422 $ 58,038 Investments 260,000 610,000 560,000 310,000 Total Assets $ 431,159 $ 18,177,301 $ 18,240,422 $ 368,038 Liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other governmental units Total Liabilities $ 44,892 $ 16,284,869 $ Balance 32,254 5,018 166,559 164,561 7,016 Balance 1,725,873 1,778,354 January 1 $ 431,159 $ Additions 18,240,422 $ Deductions December 31 POLICE SEIZURE Assets: Cash $ 22,689 $ - $ - $ 22,689 Liabilities: Due to other governmental units $ 22,689 $ - $ - $ 22,689 PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY Assets: Cash $ 7,552 $ 1,517,793 $ 1,516,912 $ 8,433 Investments 260,000 610,000 560,000 310,000 Total Assets $ 267,552 $ 2,127,793 $ 2,076,912 $ 318,433 Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 14,025 $ 289,731 $ 298,418 $ 5,338 Salaries payable 5,018 166,559 164,561 7,016 Due to other governmental units 248,509 1,671,503 1,613,933 306,079 Total Liabilities $ 267,552 $ 2,127,793 $ 2,076,912 $ 318,433 PAYROLL Assets: Cash Liabilities: Accounts payable 1 -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION Assets: Cash Liabilities: Due to other governmental units $ 30,867 $ 15,995,138 $ 15,999,089 $ 26,916 $ 30,867 $ 15,995,138 $ 15,999,089 $ 26,916 $ 110,051 $ 54,370 $ 164,421 $ - $ 110,051 $ 54,370 $ 164,421 $ - TOTALS - ALL AGENCY FUNDS Assets: Cash $ 171,159 $ 17,567,301 $ 17,680,422 $ 58,038 Investments 260,000 610,000 560,000 310,000 Total Assets $ 431,159 $ 18,177,301 $ 18,240,422 $ 368,038 Liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other governmental units Total Liabilities $ 44,892 $ 16,284,869 $ 16,297,507 $ 32,254 5,018 166,559 164,561 7,016 381,249 1,725,873 1,778,354 328,768 $ 431,159 $ 18,177,301 $ 18,240,422 $ 368,038 89 Supplementary Financial Information CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ffrAX CAPACITY, TAX LEVIES AND TAX CAPACITY RATES (shown by year of tax collectibility) Total tax capacity Increment valuation Contribution to fiscal disparities pool Tax capacity used --- for rate calculation IFiscal disparities distribution Adjusted net tax capacity Tax levies: General fund Equipment Debt service Total certified tax levies 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $ 120,084,430 $ 122,532,149 $ 120,816,822 $ 113,981,017 $ 109,012,566 (9,771,137) (10,307,195) (4,960,337) (4;043,859) (3,917,958) (9,358,999) (10,393,526) (10,942,782) (11,039,952) (10,283,433) 100,954,294 101,831,428 104,913,703 .98,897,206 94,811,175 2,895,523 3,298,549 3,537,906 3,421,345 3,068,256 $ 103,849,817 $ 105,129,977 $ 108,451,609 $ 102,318,551 $ 97,879,431 $ 20,314,404 $ 21,202,691 $ 20,737,472 $ 21,004,000 $ 21,604,402 - - 940,494 992,072 992,072 1,695,827 2,351,030 3,212,757 3,174,308 3,040,890 22,010,231 23,553,721 24,890,723 25,170,380 25,637,364 Referendum market value levy 595,438 600,212 602,250 615,837 610,862 Total levy Tax capacity rate: General fund revenue Bonds & interest Total tax capacity rate I Market value rate $ 22,605,669 $ 24,153,933 $ 25,492,973 $ 25,786,217 $ 26,248,226 19.563 20.204 20.004 21.548 23.131 1.634 2.243 2.968 3.112 3.116 21.197 22.447 22.972 24.660 26.247 0.00601, 0.00597 0.00606 0.00654 0.00667 91 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINED SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS December 31, 2011 Final Interest Maturity Rates Date Date Tax Increment Bonds: Prior Years Original Issue Redeemed Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2000A 4.30 - 4.80 09/06/00 02/01/11 $ 2,620,000 Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2002B 3.00% 08/05/02 02/01/12 1,400,000 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2005D 3.00-3.40 07/19/05 02/01/13 3,505,000 Total Tax Increment Bonds 7,525,000 General Obligation Bonds: GO Park & Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 2005A GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2007A GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2009A GO Equipment Certificates, Series 2009B GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2010A GO Equipment Certificates, Series 2010B Total General Obligation Bonds Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: GO Permanent Improvement Revolving, Series 2005E GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2007C GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2008B GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2010B GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2011A Total PIR Bonds Public Project Revenue Bonds: 3.50-4.00 07/19/05 02/01/17 4.00-4.25 05/24/07 02/01/28 3.00-4.40 04/29/09 02/01/30 2.00-3.00 04/29/09 01/01/12 2.00-4.00 11/18/10 02/01/21 2.00 11/18/10 02/01/13 3.00 - 3.75 09/13/05 02/01/16 3.60 - 4.25 05/24/07 02/01/19 3.00 - 4.00 08/28/08 02/01/20 2.00-3.00 11118/10 02/01/22 5,375,000 5,865,000 14,000,000 230,000 8,285,000 230,000 33,985,000 1,460,000 5,870,000 7,755,000 2,305,000 $ 2,295,000 1,910,000 4,205,000 1,710,000 400,000 75,000 2,185,0001 615,000 505,000 2.00-3.00 10/27/11 02/01/23 - 17,390,000 1,120,000 Public Project Revenue, Series 2005 3.00-4.13 09/13/05 05/01/26 Taxable Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10-4.55 11/24/09 02/01/30 Taxable Public Project Revenue, Series 2009B 1.95-5.80 11/24/09 02/01/30 Total Public Project Revenue Bonds Revenue Bonds: Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009C Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2003C Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011 A Total Public Project Revenue Bonds Total - Bonded indebtedness 2.00-3.00 04/29/09 2.00-4.00 12/10/09 1.10-3.55 03/01/03 4.00% 05/24/07 3.00-4.00 08/28/08 2.00-3.00 10/27/11 W 5,425,000 775,000 2,595,000 - 6,125,000 - 14,145,000 775,000 01/01/17 2,010,000 415,000 02/01/30 2,440,000 - 02/01/13 3,200,000 2,125,000 02/01/17 8,210,000 2,200,000 02/01/19 13,985,000 1,730,000 02/01/22 - - 29,845,000 6,470,000 $ 102,890,000 $14,755,000 3,665,000 - 470,000 Principal Interest Interest Outstanding 2011 Payable Due Due Payable 12/31/10 Issued Payments 12/31/11 In 2012 In 2012 to Maturity $ 325,000 $ - $ 325,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1,400,000 - - 1,400,000 1,400,000 21,000 21,000 1,595,000 - 515,000 1,080,000 530,000 27,445 36,795 3,320,000 - 840,000 2,480,000 1,930,000 48,445 57,795 3,665,000 - 470,000 3,195,000 485,000 114,350 390,794 5,465,000 - 210,000 5,255,000 220,000 210,144 2,048,759 14,000,000 - 510,000 13,490,000 525,000 484,999 5,578,855 155,000 - 75,000 80,000 80,000 800 800 8,285,000 - 755,000 7,530,000 635,000 285,325 1,599,025 230,000 - 80,000 150,000 75,000 2,250 3,000 31,800,000 - 2,100,000 29,700,000 2,020,000 1,097,868 9,6211233 845,000 - 150,000 695,000 145,000 22,294 62,047 5,365,000 - 525,000 4,840,000 555,000 175,756 765,906 7,755,000 - 655,000 7,100,000 675,000 244,019 1,278,742 2,305,000 - - 2,305,000 - 54,100 357,725 - 3,320,000 - 3,320,000 - 61,345 600,645 16,270,000 3,320,000 1,330,000 18,260,000 1,375,000 557,514 3,065,065 4,650,000 - 210,000 4,440,000 220,000 175,044 1,496,072 2,595,000 - - 2,595,000 - 100,203 1,185,411 6,125,000 - - 6,125,000 125,000 290,141 3,431,469 13,370,000 - 210,000 13,160,000 345,000 565,388 6,112,952 1,595,000 - 405,000 1,190,000 420,000 22,400 55,400 2,440,000 - 80,000 2,360,000 100,000 82,600 946,600 1,075,000 - 345,000 730,000 360,000 19,345 25,913 6,010,000 - 760,000 5,250,000 795,000 194,100 654,000 12,255,000 - 1,165,000 11,090,000 1,205,000 399,781 1,852,182 - 11,230,000 - 11,230,000 - 198,764 1,679,039 23,375,000 11,230,000 21755,000 31,850,000 2,880,000 916,990 5,213,134 $ 88,135,000 $14,550,000 $ 7,235,000 $ 95,450,000 $ 8,550,000 $ 3,186,205 $ 24,070,179 93 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT -NO. 1202, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT December 31, 2011 Source of funds: Bond proceeds Tax increments received Real estate sales * Interest on invested funds Other Total sources of funds: Uses of funds: Land acquisition Installation of public utilities and improvements Bond payments: Principal Interest Loan /note interest Paid to other governments Administrative costs Total uses of funds: Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining $ 4,500,000 $ 9,900,000 $ 9,475,915 - 29,737,107 17,764,833 4,700,000 5,402,344 300,000 1,100,026 - - 61,068 4,500,000 44,637,107 33,804,186 4,310,000 6,500,000 17,127,000 4,984,728 9,738,935 897,273 48,061 QAR 'AAA $ 424,085 11,075,001 (702,344) (848,087) (61,068) 9,887,587 1,515,272 7,388,065 - 9,900,000 7,912,555 325,000 1,662,445 - 9,190,000 3,274,104 49,800 5,866,096 - - 5,150,288 - (5,150,288) - - 203,984 1,944 (205,928) 190,000 1,920,107 1,375,023 428 544,656 4,500,000 44,637,107 32,639,617 377,172 11,620,318 Funds remaining (deficit) $ - $ - $ 1,164,569 $ 568,162 $ (1,732,731) Cost to authority Price paid by developer * Real estate sales 5229 Eden Ave. 5220 Eden Circle 5244 Eden Circle (condemnation deposit) 5201 Eden Circle Project area $ 1,822,319 995,000 309,937 1,447,043 23,832 $ 4,598,131 �Tlj 2,070,119 4,005,694 $ 6,075,813 'OF EDINA, MINNESOTA E,DULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT -NO. 1203, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT ricts 1200, 1201, 1203 and 1204 are pooled) ,tuber 31, 2011 Uses of funds: Accounted and acquisition Original Amended for in Current Amount Installation of public utilities Budget Budget prior years year remaining Source of funds: 26,677,000 25,871,230 21,186,039 25,321 4,659,870 and proceeds $ 41,400,000 $ 34,400,000 $ 33,761,677. $ - $ 638,323 ax increments received 80,000,000 901000,000 45,329,718 3,186,072 41,484,210 eal estate:sales * 5,000,000 11,637,070 11,637,070 - - pecial assessment - 1,321,096 - - 1,321,096 nterest on invested funds - 2,500,000 4,255,507 256,719 (2,012,226) ransfer in - 40,000,000 38,646,971 - 1,353,029 ale of material - 255,710 255,710 - - eveloper payments - 297,826 297,826 - - ther - 20,000 21,799 - (1,799) Total sources of funds: 126,400,000 180,431,702 134,206,278 3,442,791 42,782,633 Uses of funds: and acquisition 13,900,000 22,981,425 22,981,425 - Installation of public utilities Land improvements 26,677,000 25,871,230 21,186,039 25,321 4,659,870 and payments: Principal 41,400,000 41,400,000 34,299,724 515,000 6,585,276 Interest 38,000,000 38,000,000 34,215,802 44,559 3,739,639 dministrative costs 1,140,800 1,600,000 1,398,185 40,238 161,577 aid to other governments - 42,000 45,837 4,346 (8,183) oan /note interest - 14,684,711 6,250,273 529,415 7,905;023 arkland dedication fees - 2,030,345 2,030,345 - - Total uses of funds: 121,117,800 146,609,711 122,407,630 .1,158,879 23,043,202 Funds remaining (deficit) $ 5,282,200 $ 33,821,991 $ 11,798,648 $ 21283,912 $ 19,739,431 Cost to authority Price paid by developer * Real estate sales Retail and theater site $ 3,213,720 $ 3,213,720 Medical office site 815,092 815,092 Office site 1,107,160 1,107,160 Office building #1 449,300 449,300 Office building #2 1,280,702 1,280,702 Office building #3 1,341,533 1,341,533 Office building #4 1,625,849 1,625,849 Office building #5 1,803,714 1,803,714 $ 11,637,070 $ 11,637,070 95 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR 70TH STREET AND CAHILL ROAD DISTRICT -NO. 1207, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT December 31, 2011 Source of funds: Bond proceeds Tax increments received Interest on invested funds Total sources of funds: Uses of funds: Land acquisition Installation of public utilities and improvements Demolition Relocation Capitalized interest Debt service Paid to other governments Administrative costs Total uses of funds: Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining $ 1,911,000 $ 1,911,000 $ - $ - $ 1,911,000 2,177,855 2,177,855 746,863 - 1,430,992 - - 276,490 15,220 (291,710) 4,088,855 4,088,855 1,023,353 15,220 3,050,282 529,400 325,000 150,000 160,000 150,000 2,178,455 529,400 43,937 325,000 150,000 160,000 150,000 2,178,455 596,000 596,000 4,088,855 4,088,855 1,862 483,601 540,279 - (215,279) - - 150,000 - - 160,000 - - 150,000 - - 2,178,455 2,730 - (2,730) 74,830 - 521,170 661,776 1,862 3,425,217 Funds remaining (deficit) $ - $ - $ 361,577 $ 13,358 $ (374,935) Statistical Section STATISTICAL SECTION This part of the City's comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the City's overall financial health. Contents Page Financial Trends . 98 These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City's financial performance and well -being have changed over time. Revenue Capacity 106 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City's most significant local revenue source, the property tax. Debt Capacity 110 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City's current levels of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information 115 These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City's financial activities take place. Operating Information 117 These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City's financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year. The City implemented GASB Statement 34 in 2003; schedules presenting government -wide information include information beginning in that year. 97 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NET ASSETS BY COMPONENT LAST NINE FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) NN Fiscal Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 Governmental activities Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 21,792,377 $ 34,320,784 $ 36,092,020 $ 69,814,012 Restricted 4,676,748 2,145,488 78,943 - Unrestricted 31,876,783 28,762,040 35,796,801 15,280,058 Total governmental activities net assets $ 58,345,908 $ 65,228,312 $ 71,967,764 $ 85,094,070 Business -type activities Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 29,952,549 $ 37,240,476 $ 40,044,169 $ 46,981,755 Restricted 1,672,828 - - - Unrestricted 15,344,474 11,934,496 11,121,720 6,379,515 Total business -type activities net assets $ 46,969,851 $ 49,174,972 $ 51,165,889 $ 53,361,270 Primary government Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 51,744,926 $ 71,561,260 $ 76,136,189 $ 116,795,767 Restricted 6,349,576 2,145,488 78,943 - Unrestricted 47,221,257 40,696,536 46,918,521 21,659,573 Total primary government net assets $ 105,315,759 $ 114,403,284 $ 123,133,653 $ 138,455,340 NN Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 $ 67,680,882 $ 71,601,227 $ 69,622,370 $ 69,783,162 $ 75,045,018 - 3,362,446 7,132,865 9,952,443 22,915,776 25,136,312 29,577,462 30,705,600 41,709,528 29,544,149 $ 92,817,194 $ 104;541,135 $ 63,117,351 $ 121,445,133 $ 127,504,943 107,460,835 $ $ 43,046,160 $ 46,851,736 $ 47,333,794 $ 48,807,806 $ 56,877,100 - 954,486 624,837 618,852 623,099 13,649,355 12,071,776 15,158,720 17,041,122 12,926,674 $ 56,695,515 $ 59,877,998 $ 63,117,351 $ 187,912,913 $ 70,426,873 66,467,780 $ $ 110,727,042 $ 118,452,963 $ 116,956,164 $ 118,590,968 $ 131,922,118 - 4,316,932 7,757,702 10,571,295 23,538,875 38,785,667 41,649,238 45,864,320 58,750,650 42,470,823 $ 149,512,709 $ 164,419,133 $ 170,578,186 $ 187,912,913 $ 197,931,816 99 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN NET ASSETS LAST NINE FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) Expenses Governmental activities: General government Public safety Public works Parks Interest on long -term debt Total governmental activities expenses Business -type activities: Utilities Liquor Aquatic center Golf course Community activity centers Total business -type activities expenses Total primary government expenses Program Revenues Governmental activities: Charges for services: General government Public safety Other activities Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions Total governmental activities program revenues Business -type activities: Charges for services: Utilities Liquor Aquatic center Golf course Community activity centers Operating grants and contributions Total business -type activities program revenues Total primary government program revenues Net Governmental activities Business -type activities Total primary government net expense General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Assets Governmental activities: Property taxes Tax increment collections Franchise taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain on disposal of capital assets Transfers Total governmental activities Business -type activities: Property taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets Transfers Total business -type activities Total primary government Change in Net Assets Governmental activities Business -type activities Total primary government 2003 Fiscal Year 2004 2005 2006 $ 5,839,893 $ 6,934,045 $ 4,967,008 $ 10,784,215 11,063,767 12,019,027 5,621,291 5,834,490 7,185,784 4,484,685 4,248,060 5,901,648 2,760,022 2,399,682 2,288,524 _ 29,490,106 30,480,044 32,361,991 _ 7,930,502 7,801,580 8,254,409 8,764,081 9,110,888 9,749,313 711,061 701,768 725,936 3,555,243 3,508,741 3,580,307 3,833,026 3,850,192 3,825,562 _ 24,793,913 24,973,169 26,135,527 $ 54,284,019 $ 55,453,213 $ 58,497,518 $ $ 930,391 $ 454,603 $ 619,526 $ 4,213,081 4,634,744 5,614,406 898,141 748,398 630,157 1,215,745 1,154,808 1,512,366 7,214,393 4,192,947 2,252,491 _ 14,471,751 11,185,500 10,628,946 _ 9,694,981 9,659,631 861,340 3,684,079 2,966,731 132,031 26,998,793 $ 41,470,544 9,875,078 10,030,067 764,134 3,538,122 3,254,012 138,447 27,599,860 $ 38,785,360 10,240,381 10,752,724 849,380 3,482,999 3,251,860 131,408 28,708,752 $ 39,337,698 5,414,96 13,300,35 8,973,03 5,341,68 2,973.74 795,61 3,652,16 4,048,64 27,700,04 63,703,82 731,61 6,146,11 793,79 1,423,30 4,013,61 13,108,44 11,421,47 11,029,44 867,62 3,646,62 3,337,15 $ (15,018,355) $ (19,294,544) $ (21,733,045) $ (22,895,33 2,204,880 2,626,691 2,573,225 2,724,631 $ (12,813,475) $ (16,667,853) $ (19,159,820) $ (20,170,7 $ 17,815,426 $ 17,865,757 $ 19,071,202 $ 20,414,298 7,342,270 6,761,934 7,060,744 7,228,002 - 450,956 457,421 499,206 286,209 443,074 977,956 1,230,264 26,669 - 63,674 8,418 (4,053,805) 655,227 841,500 838,230 21,416,769 26,176,948 28,472,497 30,218,418 387,117 227,167 236,654 283,771 (177,051) 6,490 22,538 25,210 4,053,805 (655,227) (841,500) (838,230 4,263,871 (421,570) (582,308) (529,249 $ 25,680,640 $ 25,755,378 $ 27,890,189 $ 29,689,169 $ 6,398,414 $ 6,882,404 $ 6,739,452 $ 7,323,086 6,468,751 2,205,121 1,990,917 2,195,381 $ 12,867,165 $ 9,087,525 $ 8,730,369 $ 9,518,46 100 2007 2008 $ 7,039,298 13,743,194 8,757,022 5,025,560 1,887,633 36,452,707 10,036,844 10,361,998 780,981 3,621,977 4,168,534 28,970,334 $ 65,423,041 $ 784,659 5,632,642 736,329 1,384,024 4,299,509 12,837,163 13,125,773 11,436,175 868,833 3,630,538 3,517,111 127,492 32,705,922 $ 45,543,085 $ (23,615,544) 3,735,588 $ (19,879,956) $ 21,459,001 7,793,577 570,871 1,581,702 58,377 919,625 32,383,153 510,678 7,604 (919,625 (401,343) $ 31,981,810 $ 6,836,248 14,833,647 9,046,873 5,971,565 1,923,821 38,612,154 10,625,811 11,649,223 787,663 3,612,482 4,502,849 30,578,028 $ 69,190,182 $ 840,070 5,839,683 763,130 1,170,183 7,710,015 16,323,081 13,713,249 12,122,599 925,388 3,680,584 3,517,218 147,456 34,106,494 $ 50,429,575 Fiscal Year 2009 2010 $ 7,362,560 14,751,479 8,993,290 7,732,777 2,129,490 40,969,596 11,833,994 11,449,194 798,369 3,588,831 4,636,375 32,306,763 $ 73,276,359 $ 811,087 5,081,563 804,500 1,377,785 2,582,999 10,657,934 14,858,488 12,655,777 859,816 3,660,466 3,606,684 135,917 35,777,148 $ 46,435,082 $ 6,961,082 15,543,594 8,558,363 5,608,758 2,528,424 39,200,221 11,848,538 11,594,643 769,608 3,561,573 4,492,779 32,267,141 $ 71,467,362 $ 946,107 5,448,505 723,559 1,162,411 13,325,431 21,606,013 15,036,016 12,857,064 945,529 3,443,204 3,495,982 373,230 36,151,025 $ 57,757,038 $ (22,289,073) $ (30,311,662) $ (17,594,208) 3,528,466 3,470,385 3,883,884 $ (18,760,607) $ (26,841,277) $ (13,710,324) $ 22,242,276 8,578,434 647,466 1,185,899 1,265 967,800 33,623,140 607,312 14,505 967,800 (345,983) $ 33,277,157 $ 23,834,274 7,587,386 667,791 387,177 11,709 743,025 33,231,362 $ 300,372 209,371 2,250 (743,025) (231,032) $ 33,000,330 $ 8,767,609 $ 11,334,067 $ 2,919,700 3,334,245 3,182,483 3,239,353 $ 12,101,854 $ 14,516,550 $ 6,159,053 101 . $ 25,122,113 4,488,073 692,288 474,444 35,594 765,994 31,578,506 205,965 26,574 765,994) (533,455) $ 31,045,051 $ 13,984,298 3,350,429 $ 17,334,727 2011 $ 7,013,231 16,024,575 9,193,336 5,540,585 2,339,370 40,111,097 12,130,685 11,727,106 718,027 3',390;949 4,687,916 32,654,683 $ 72,765,780 $ 969,745 5,988,485 775,676 1,392,892 5,770,912 14,897,710 15,873,937 13,172,484 913,383 3,285,741 3,646,571 135,428 37,027,544 $ 51,925,254 $ (25,213,387) 4,372,861 $ (20,840,526) $ 25,040,871 4,083,345 722,160 601,250 131,365 694,206 31,273,197 280,438 (694,206) (413,768) $ 30,859,429 $ 6,059,810 3,959,093 $ 10,018,903 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) General fund Reserved Unreserved Nonspendable Restricted Assigned Unassigned Total general fund All other, governmental funds Reserved Unreserved, reported in: Special revenue funds Capital projects funds Restricted, reported in: Special revenue funds Debt service funds Construction funds Assigned, reported.in: _ Capital projects funds Total all other governmental funds Fiscal Year 2002 2003a 2004 2005b $ 417,093 $ 412,991 $ 390,771 $ 223,351 14,325,972 9,961,074 10,226,055 11,595,433 $ 14,743,065. $ 10;616,826 $ 11,818,784 $ 10,374,065 $ 4,186,436 $ 4,084,987 $ 3,465,440 $ 13,792,312 1589,518 686,777 781,458 731,027 26,750,351 19,608;849 16,651,788 17,032,750 $ 32,526,305 $ 24,380,613 $ 20,898,686 $ 31,556,089 a The substantial decrease in unreserved fund.balance in 2003 is due to the transfer of investment assets to the Edinbo rough Park/Centennial Lakes enterprise fund. The substantial increase in reserved fund balancein 2005 is due to two crossover refunding bond issues that were outstanding as of December 31, 2005. The substantial -decrease in general fund unreserved fund,balance in 2009 is due to the transfer of..the equipment replacement program to the construction fund.' The substantial increase in other governmental funds reserved fund balance in 2009 is due to unspent bond proceeds related to, the new Public Works Facility, which is under construction. d The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions", in 2011. The City did not apply the statement retroactively. 102 I Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009° 2010 20114 $ 36,849 $ 28,637 $ 13,982 $ 18,241 $ 10,258 $ - 13,797,189 14,078,220 14,365,021 12,031,358 12,868,952 - - - 10,871 178,295 1.,539,286 - 11,744,764 $ 13,834,038 $ 14,106,857 $ 14,379,003 $ 12,049,599 $ 12,879,210 $ 13,473,216 $ 2,682,238 $ 6,247,539 $ 8,467,918 $ 15,223,353 $ 9,460,834 $ - 13,179,904 14,750,448 14,950,538 12,813,439 15,333,460 - 3,160,085 5,853,322 4,270,440 6,683,668 12,150,968 - - 17,178,857 - 8,068,183 - 2,087,548 _ _ _ - - 8,098,935 $ 19,022,227 $ 26,851,309 $ 27,688,896 $ 34,720,460 $ 36,945,262 $ 35,433,523 103 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) Revenues General property taxes Tax increment collections Special assessments Franchise fees License and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Investment income Rental of property Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures General government Public safety Public works Parks Capital outlay Debt service Principal Interest and other charges Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in Transfers out Sale of capital assets Bonds issued Premium on bonds issued Discount on bonds issued Refunding bonds issued Payment to refunding escrow Principal paid by escrow Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balances Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures Fiscal Year gnn,2 gnn� $ 24,735,336 $ 17,903,618 - 7,342,270 998,908 1,019,461 418,153 393,627 1,939,207 2,182,263 2,254,968 4,678,735 2,096,806 2,076,519 910,407 785,227 1,178,211 286,209 1,782,063 354,266 180,081 200,551 36,494,140 37,222,746 5,372,431 5,709,741 9,893,428 10,352,816 4,161,373 4,142,668 2,602,266 2,974,164 11,059,757 15,539,676 5,885,000 5,700,000 3,094,480 2,908,787 42,068,735 47,327,852 (5,574,595) (10,105,106) 12,308,480 8,752,126 (11,552,990) (12,805,931) 13,637,416 1,540,000 - 59,219 - 6,570,000 (2,550,000) (6,525,000) 2004 2005 $ 17,865,757 6,761,934 966,879 450,956 2,247,759 3,933,540 2,279,302 863,073 443,074 385,707 294,136 36,492,117 5,213,469 11,125,388 4,386,669 2,954,372 7,772,321 $ 19,071,202 7,060,744 1,354,264 457,421 3,240,622 1,539,169 2,466,663 742,917 977,956 315,542 227,446 37,453,946 5,477,308 11, 373,763 4,882,811 3,146,029 8,227,191 6,450,000 6,830,000 2,484,291 2,543,639 40,386,510 42,480,741 (3,894,393) (5,026,795) 8,367,595 7,797,369 (7,712,368) (6,955,869) - 135,045 - 15,816,165 (36,275) 16,764,721 (16,635,000) 11,842,906 (2,409,586) 655,227 16,886,156 $ 6,268,311 $ (12,514,692) $ (3,239,166) $ 11,859,361 29.0% 27.1% 27.4% 27.4% a The substantial change in debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures in 2007 is due to a change in the way this ratio is calculated. The City did not recalculate previously reported ratios. 104 Fiscal Year 2006 2007a 2008 2009 2010 2011 $ 20,414,298 $ 21,459,001 $ 22,242,276 $ 23,834,274 $ 25,122,113 $ 24,972,166 7,228,002 7,793,577 8,578,434 7,587,386 4,488,073 4,083,345 1,751,219 1,750,444 2,442,490 2,703,833 6,746,186 4,502,112 499,206 570,871 647,466 667,791 692;288 722,160 3,488,897 2,909,521 2,915,455 2,104,967 2,410,314 2,724,763 2,773,350 3,699,006 3,005,883 1,507,170 3,726,849 3,059,964 2,691,354 2,748,709 3,093,941 2,905,410 3;014,894 3,181,961 1,023,935 971,486 1,073,174 1,224,983 1,203,767 1,243,426 1,230,264 1,581,702 1,185,899 387,177 474•,444 601,250 310,145 355,734 255,607 343,616 426,517 539,091 246,797 225,839 126,723 160,035 413,400 156,231 41,657,467 44,065,890 45,567,348 43,426,642 48;718,845 45,786,469 5,995,804 6,544,307 6,235,352 6,895,329 6,523,398 5,739,481 12,431,114 12,985,215 13,788,797 13,692,686 14,11 77, 387 14,668,M 5,233,907 5,787,619 6,189,594 5,911,758 5,898,023 6,000,539 3,300,375 3,455,789 3,693,595 3,688,063 3,524,950 3,633,922 8,980,526 11,991,122 14,666,907 22,997,065 13,505,827 14,235,496 5,985,000 6,190,000 7,090,000 7,415,000 2,975,000 4,480,000 2,107,036 1,677,770 1,967,021 1,841,342 2,584,006 2,278,068 44,033,762 48,631,822 53,631,266 62,441,243 49,188,591 51,036,278 (2,376,295) (4,565,932) (8,063,918) (19,014,601) (469,746) (5,249,809) 6,865,258 7,290,391 7,983,585 11,347,773 2,903,762 5,615,669 (6,027,028) (6,370,766) (7,015,785) (10,604,748) (2,137,768) (4,921,463) 54,457 66845 96,825 34,592 134,329 209,773 - 11,735,000 7,755,000 22,950,000 2,535,000 3,320,000 - - - 64,765 898,658 108,097 - (53,637) (35,848) (75,621) - - _ 8,285,000 - 9 094 822 - (9,035,000) - - - - - (8,142,313) 12,667,833 8,783,777 23,716,761 3,524,159 4,332,076 $ (10,518,608) $ 8,101,901 $ 719,859 $ 4,702,160 $ 3,054,413 $ (917,733) 23.1% 20.9% 22.6% 21.7% 15.4% 17.8% 105 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ASSESSED VALUE, ACTUAL VALUE AND TAX CAPACITY OF TAXABLE PROPERTY LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. 2002 -2004 estimated market values obtained from previous CAFRs and do not include personal property. DNA: Historical data is not available a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown. The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification. b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity (see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate "). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only. 106 Market Value (In Thousands)' Tax Capacity (In Thousands) City Tax City Estimate Fiscal Used Adjusted Capacity Referendum Direct Year Estimated Limited Taxable Total for Rate Net Rate Rate Rate b 2002 $5,821,567 DNA DNA $ 72,584 $ 59,176 $ 61,007 27.806% 0.01200% $2.914 2003 6,328,581 DNA DNA 77,666 63,169 65,145 27.139% 0.01100% 2.794 2004 6,909,477 DNA DNA 83,448 68,553 70,756 25.565% 0.01000% 2.618 2005 8,052,704 $7,674,983 $7,668,117 91,310 76,343 78,717 24.085% 0.00880% 2.354 2006 8,713,166 8,541,954 8,536,086 101,948 86,860 89,272 22.613% 0.00703% 2.317 2007 9,619,356 9,456,650 9,451,668 113,429 96,170 98,765 21.150% 0.00641% 2.172 2008 9,986,738 9,933,166 9,928,907 120,084 100,954 103,850 21.197% 0.00601% 2.204 2009 10,112,498 10,091,005 10,079,499 122,532 101,831 105,130 22.447% 0.00597% 2.334 2010 9,960,341 9,960,341 9,949,807 120,817 104,914 108,452 22.972% 0.00606% 2.501 2011 9,441,688 9,441,688 9,431,941 113,981 98,897 102,319 24.660% 0.00654% 2.672 Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. 2002 -2004 estimated market values obtained from previous CAFRs and do not include personal property. DNA: Historical data is not available a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown. The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification. b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity (see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate "). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only. 106 PITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA IRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX CAPACITY RATES ST TEN FISCAL YEARS Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. Some 2002 -2004 data obtained from previous CAFR's. HMV: Referendum Market Value DNA: Historical data is not available 3eographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit, lennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City, Vine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates. 107 City Rates Overlapping Rates Total Fiscal Basic Debt Total Tax ISD #273 Edina Direct & Year Rate Rate Capacity RMV Hennepin Tax Cap. RMV Other Overlap 2002 26.116% 1.690% 27.806% 0.012% 50.409% 18.504% DNA 9.847% 106:566% 2003 24.586% 2.553% 27.139% 0.011% 50.607% 21312% DNA 8.993% 110.051% 2004 23.183% 2.382% 25.565% 0.010% 47.324% 22.670% DNA 8.256% 103.815% 2005 22.536% 1.549% 24.085% 0.009% 44.172% 19.694% 0.166% 8.547% 96.498 % 2006 20.755% 1.858 %. 22.613% 0.007% 41.016% 19.226% 0.154% 8.104% 90.959 %. 2007 19.636% 1.514% 21.150% 0.006% 39.110% 18.244% 0.147% 8.417% .86.921% 2008 19.563% 1.634% 21.197% 0.006% 36.571% 16.951% 0.177% 8.546% 85.265% 2009 20.204% 2.243% 22.447% 0.006% 40.413% 17.766% 0.183% 8.413 % 89.039% 2610 20.004% 2.968% 22.972% 0.006% 42.640% 18.746% 0.194% 9.431% 93.789% 2011 21.548% 3.112% 24.660% 0.007% 45.840% 21.786% 0.196% 10.489% 102.775 %. Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. Some 2002 -2004 data obtained from previous CAFR's. HMV: Referendum Market Value DNA: Historical data is not available 3eographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit, lennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City, Vine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates. 107 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAX PAYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO Taxpayer Tax Capacity Southdale Shopping Center $ 2,308,500 Galleria Shopping Center 1,188,800 Southdale Office Park 686,102 Centennial Lakes Retail 679,250 Southdale Medical Building 620,285 Centennial Lakes Phase V 571,370 Centennial Lakes Phase IV 560,290 National Car 536,870 Target 439,250 Hellmuth & Johnson 397,956 Centennial Lakes Phase II United Healthcare Corporation 7700 France Totals $ 7,988,673 Source: City of Edina Assessing Office 2002 108 Percentage Percentag of Total of Total Rank Capacity Tax Capacity Rank Capacity 1 2.03% $ 1,950,996 1 2.69% 2 1.04% 784,882 3 1.08% 3 0.60% 848,094 2 1.17% 4 0.60% 344,974 9 0.48% 5 0.54% 451,904 8 0.62% 6 0.50% 553,106 5 0.76% 7 0.49% 568,808 4 0.78% 8 0.47% - 0.00% 9 0.39% - 0.00% 10 0.35% - 0.00% 0.00% 344,974 10 0.48% 0.00% 539,116 6 0.74% 0.00% 473,950 7 0.65% 7.01% $ 6,860,804 9.45% 108 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Collected within the Total Fiscal Year of the Levy Collections in Taxes Tax Percentage Subsequent Payable Levy Amount of Levy Years 2002 $ 17,728,603 $ 16,985,098 95.81% 2003 18,506,442 17,808,469 96.23% 2004 18,808,903 18,066,892 96.06% 2005 19,667,551 19,090,016 97.06% 2006 20,820,130 20,310,889 97.55% 2007 21,530,528 21,347,789 a 99.15% a 2008 22,605,669 22,178,719 b 98.11% b 2009 24,153,933 23,484,137 ° 97.23% 2010 25,492,973 24,904,346 97.69% 2011 25,786,217 25,067,625 97.21% Total Collections to Date Percentage Amount of Levy $ 85,589 $ 17,070,687 96.29% 50,633 17,859,102 96.50% 22,734 18,089,626 96.18% 82,177 19,172,193 97.48% 66,489 20,377,378 97.87% 58,673 21,406,462 99.42% 159,682 22,338,401 98.82% 71,373 23,555,510 97.52% (52,537) 24,851,810 97.48% - 25,067,625 97.21% Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. a In 2007 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for MVHC after five years of not making payments. b In 2008 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for only 50% of MVHC. In 2009 the State of Minnesota once again quit reimbursing the City for MVHC. 109 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (dollars in thousands, except per capita) Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. 110 Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities General Public Tax Permanent Rec. Utility Total Percentage Fiscal Obligation Project Increment Improvement Facility Revenue Primary of Personal Per Year Debt Revenue Bonds Revolving Bonds . Bonds Government Income . Ca ita' 2002 $ 6,950 $ 12,410 $ 40,855 $ - $ 7,890 $ 2,630 $ 70,735 3.31% ( $ = CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (dollars in thousands, except per capita) Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. a See statistical schedule titled "Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property" for estimated property value data. 111 General Bonded Debt General Public Tax Percentage Obligation Project Increment of Property Per Debt Revenue Bonds Total Value a Capita $ 6,950 $ 12,410 $ 40,855 $ 60,215 1.03% $ 1,269 8,165 12,035 35,900 56,100 0.89% 1,179 7,295 11,595 30,760 49,650 0.72% 1,031 11,765 16,560 28,905 57,230 0.71% 1,206 5,670 16,080 20,460 42,210 0.48% 900 10,990 15,390 15,665 42,045 0.44% 893 10,420 14,675 10,015 35,110 0.35% 729 24,020 22,650 4,125 50,795 0.50% 1,055 31,800 13,370 3,320 48,490 0.49% 1,007 29,700 13,160 2,480 45,340 0.48 % 939 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. a See statistical schedule titled "Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property" for estimated property value data. 111 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011 Net General Percentage Obligation Bonded Applicable Debt Outstanding a in City b Overlapping Debt: City Share of Debt Hennepin County $ 723,889,101 7.57% $ 54,798,405 Hennepin Suburban Park District 64,252,898 10.16% 6,528,094 Hennepin Regional Rail Authority 40,128,161 7.57% 3,037,702 School Districts: ISD No. 273 (Edina) 69,167,442 98.66% 68,240,598 ISD No. 270 (Hopkins) 181,415,841 8.43% 15,293,355 ISD No. 272 (Eden Prairie) 72,112,436 1.05% 757,181 ISD No. 280 (Richfield) 25,696,510 22.66% 5,822,829 ISD No. 283 (St. Louis Park) 44,284,075 0.02% 8,857 Metro Council Total Overlapping Debt Direct Debt: City of Edina Total Overlapping and Direct Debt Debt Ratios: Ratio of debt per capita (48,262 population) 142,956,525 1,363,902,989 27,635,989 $ 1,391,538,978 Ratio of debt to estimated market valuation of $9,441,688,000 Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services 3.28% 4,688,974 159,175,995 100.00% 27,635,989 $ 186,811,984 $ 3,871 a Calculation excludes revenue and special assessment bonds as well as sinking fund balance, if any. b The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using tax capacity. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's tax capacity that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total tax capacity. 112 1.98% ATY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA .EGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION .AST TEN FISCAL YEARS dollars in thousands) Fiscal Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008a 2009 2010 2011 )ebtlimit $ 138,279 $ 138,190 $ 160,674 $ 173,867 $ 191,974 $ 199,775 $ 302,385 $ 301,369 $,298,494 $ 282,958 'otal net debt applicable to limit 19,360 20,200 18,890 29,785 21,750 26,380 25,095 46,670 45,170 42,860 .egal debt margin $ 118,919 $ 117,990 $ 141,784 $ 144,082 $ 170,224 $ 173,395 $ 277,290 $254,699 $ 253,324 $ 240,098 'otal net debt applicable to the limit as a percentage of debt limit 14.00% 14.62% 11.76% 17.13% 11.33% 13.20% 8.30% 15.49% 15.13% 15.15% Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2011 Market value (after fiscal disparities) $ 9,431,940,900 Debt limit (3% of market value) 282,958,227 Debt applicable to limit: General obligation bonds 29,700,000 Public project revenue bonds 13,160,000 Total debt applicable to limit 42,860,000 Legal debt margin $ 240,098,227 The State of Minnesota changed the legal debt limit from 2% of taxable market value to 3% during 2008. 113 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal 85,656 Less: operating Net available 85,656 Debt service requirements 43,366 Year Revenue expenses revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage Public Project Revenue Bonds (Annual Appropriation Lease Revenue) - 7,342,270 5,000,000 1,889,329 2003 $ 1,026,437 $ - $ 1,026,437 $ 375,000 $ 15,000 $ 390,000 2.63 2004 1,028,837 - 1,028,837 440,000 557,636 997,636 1.03 2005 1,058,840 - 1,058,840 460,000 558,486 1,018,486 1.04 2006 1,501,741 - 1,501,741 480,000 779,778 1,259,778 1.19 2007 1,497,500 - 1,497,500 690,000 725,855 1,415,855 1.06 2008 1,425,186 - 1,425,186 715,000 696,118 1,411,118 1.01 2009 1,424,405 - 1,424,405 745,000 665,193 1,410,193 1.01 2010 1,421,354 - 1,421,354 9,280,000 901,535 10,181,535 0.14 2011 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 210,000 574,681 784,681 1.72 Tax Increment Bonds 85,656 - 85,656 - 43,366 2002 7,053,836 - 7,053,836 4,570,000 2,355,928 6,925,928 1.02 2003 7,342,270 - 7,342,270 5,000,000 1,889,329 6,889,329 1.07 2004 6,761,934 - 6,761,934 5,140,000 1,520,376 6,660,376 1.02 2005 7,060,744 - 7,060,744 5,465,000 1,327,983 6,792,983 1.04 2006 7,228,002 - 7,228,002 8,445,000 902,607 9,347,607 0.77 2007 7,793,577 - 7,793,577 4,795,000 625,606 5,420,606 1.44 2008 8,578,434 - 8,578,434 5,650,000 445,694 6,095,694 1.41 2009 7,587,386 - 7,587,386 5,890,000 244,236 6,134,236 1.24 2010 4,488,073 - 4,488,073 805,000 125,820 930,820 4.82 2011 4,083,345 - 4,083,345 840,000 94,359 934,359 4.37 Permanent Improvement Revolving Bonds (Special Assessment) 2006 85,656 - 85,656 - 43,366 43,366 1.98 2007 391,921 - 391,921 160,000 46,694 206,694 1.90 2008 564,534 - 564,534 155,000 306,759 461,759 1.22 2009 1,508,662 - 1,508,662 150,000 513,708 663,708 2.27 2010 1,339,350 - 1,339,350 655,000 520,278 1,175,278 1.14 2011 2,466,395 - 2,466,395 1,330,000 524,964 1,854,964 1.33 Utility Bond 2002 8,561,287 7,399,773 1,161,514 325,000 105,205 430,205 2.70 2003 9,668,434 7,769,810 1,898,624 335,000 160,691 495,691 3.83 2004 9,473,355 7,643,129 1,830,226 635,000 158,451 793,451 2.31 2005 10,225,975 8,107,039 2,118,936 645,000 141,226 786,226 2.70 2006 11,416,361 9,107,143 2,309,218 665,000 129,608 794,608 2.91 2007 13,125,419 9,735,839 3,389,580 690,000 108,840 798,840 4.24 2008 13,544,728 10,076,422 3,468,306 1,485,000 459,983 1,944,983 1.78 2009 14,857,798 10,815,216 4,042,582 2,045,000 803,157 2,848,157 1.42 2010 15,034,881 11,119,053 3,915,828 2,185,000 768,160 2,953,160 1.33 2011 15,871,102 11,438,288 4,432,814 2,270,000 693,285 2,963,285 1.50 Recreational Facility Bonds 2002 5,424,422 5,031,839 392,583 6,780,000 611,509 7,391,509 0.05 2003 5,866,300 5,511,730 354,570 745,000 265,602 1,010,602 0.35 2004 5,621,743 5,492,510 129,233 820,000 241,387 1,061,387 0.12 2005 5,708,827 5,604,464 104,363 850,000 214,108 1,064,108 0.10 2006 5,929,984 5,808,902 121,082 880,000 199,260 1,079,260 0.11 2007 5,870,485 5,798,005 72,480 905,000 168,159 1,073,159 0.07 2008 6,005,571 5,972,558 33,013 845,000 135,956 980,956 0.03 2009 5,932,900 5,977,793 (44,893) 860,000 92,128 952,128 (0.05) 2010 5,690,239 5,822,861 (132,622) 415,000 100,926 515,926 (0.26) 2011 5,510,043 5,760,947 (250,904) 485,000 115,050 600,050 (0.42) 114 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS Last Ten Fiscal Years Sources: Population data from U.S. Census Bureau /Metropolitan Council. Personal income and per capita income estimates based on MN Department of Employment and Economic Development Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. 2010 is the most recent. High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County. Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 115 Estimated Personal Per Capita High School Fiscal Income Personal Graduation Unemployment Year Population (In thousands) Income Rate Rate 2002 47,465 $ 2,134,976 $ 44;980 91.5% 4.00% 2003 47,570 2,317,801 48,724 91.5% 4.10% 2004 48,166 2,356,369 48,932 93.3% 3.90% 2005 47,448 2,341,464 49,348 92.1 % 3.30% 2006 46,896 2,365,434 50,440 92.0% 3.00% 2007 47,090 2,673,959 56,784 92.0% 3.45% 2008 48,169 2,547,369 52,884 92.0 % 4.33% 2009 48,169 2,582,436 53,612 92.4% 6.38% 2010 47,941 2,622,564 54,704 91.6% 5.56% 2011 48,262 2,640,124 54,704 92.2% 5.25% Sources: Population data from U.S. Census Bureau /Metropolitan Council. Personal income and per capita income estimates based on MN Department of Employment and Economic Development Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. 2010 is the most recent. High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County. Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 115 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO Totals 6,600 30.24% 7,650 32.83% Sources: 2011 data from www.mnprospector.com and ISD #273's annual report. For data obtained from www.mnprospector.com, low number in the range was used. 2002 data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). DNA: Historical data is not available 116 2011 2002 Percentage of Percentage Total City Total City Employer Employees Rank Employment Employees Rank Employmer Fairview Southdale Hospital 1,000 1 4.58% 2,400 1 10.30% Macy's (Marshall Field's or Dayton's) 1,000 2 4.58% 500 5 2.15% BI Worldwide 1,000 3 4.58% DNA DNA DNA Edina Public Schools ISD #273 600 4 2.75% DNA DNA DNA Promenade Salon Concepts 500 5 2.29% DNA DNA DNA Regis Salons Division 500 6 2.29% DNA DNA DNA Regis Franchise Division 500 7 2.29% DNA DNA DNA Regis Corp. 500 8 2.29% DNA DNA DNA Master Cuts Division 500 9 2.29% DNA DNA DNA Smart Style Family Hair Care 500 10 2.29% DNA DNA DNA Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. - 0.00% 2,000 2 8.58% Golden Valley Microwave Foods - 0.00% 650 3 2.79% Health Risk Management Inc. - 0.00% 552 4 2.37% JC Penny Co. - 0.00% 400 6 1.72% Norwest Funding - 0.00% 358 7 1.54% Nash Finch Co. - 0.00% 350 8 1.50% International Dairy Queen Inc. - 0.00% 300 9 1.29% Roach Organization Inc. - 0.00% 140 10 0.60% Totals 6,600 30.24% 7,650 32.83% Sources: 2011 data from www.mnprospector.com and ISD #273's annual report. For data obtained from www.mnprospector.com, low number in the range was used. 2002 data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). DNA: Historical data is not available 116 :ITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 'ULL -TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION AST TEN FISCAL YEARS ource: City of Edina Finance Department Employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. 117 Budgeted Full -time Employees for Fiscal Year' 'unction 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 ieneral Government Administration 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Planning 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.85 3.85 3.85 Finance 5.50 5.50 .5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 Elections 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assessing 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 'ublic Works Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1:50 1.50 Engineering 7.50 6.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 Supervision 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.30 Maintenance 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 27.00 27.00 27.00 'ublic Safety Police Protection 69.00 68.00 66.00 69.00 69.00 70.00 70.00 71.00 70.00 67.50 Animal Control 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Protection 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 32.00 Public Health 3.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.65 2.65 2.65 Inspections 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50_ 7.50 arks & Recreation Administration 7.00 7.00 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 Maintenance 17.00 16.00 16.50 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 �entral Services General 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 City Hall 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Public Works Bldg 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Equipment Ops 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 itilities 14.50 14.50 15.50 15.75 15.75 15.25 15.75 1875 18.75 17.20 iquor 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 ,quatic Center - - 0.20 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 golf Course 15.00 15.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 11.00 rrena 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5:00 ;rt Center 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 dinborough Park 7.00 7.00 7.00, 7.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 entennial Lakes 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1her 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.50 otal 273.00 270.00 268.50 271.50 270.00 277.50 278.00 281.00 280.00 274.00 ource: City of Edina Finance Department Employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. 117 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Function General Government Total City employees Votes cast a Public Works Asphalt placed (tons) Concrete (cu. yds.) Public Safety Crimes reported Fire calls Medical calls Central Services Vehicle fixes Utilities Daily consumption b Aquatic Center Attendance Golf Course Total rounds played Fiscal Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 860 879 870 909 887 890 918 885 869 891 28,156 10,721 31,730 1,367 26,270 7,930 31,512 2,733 25,463 7,951 - - - - 9,000 8,000 7,500 9,500 7,643 8,50( - - - - 650 850 480 640 503 55E 2,139 2,073 1,983 1,908 1,937 2,010 2,025 1,985 1,890 Nf 1,106 1,062 1,060 1,055 963 1,012 913 852 910 96( 3,153 3,030 3,199 3,423 3,470 3,510 3,516 3,496 3,599 3,65: - - - - 2,398 2,460 2,967 2,539 2,431 2,33' - - - - 7,209 7,372 7,376 7,596 6,790 6,905 111,056 96,419 88,636 139,415 120,406 114,173 110,000 64,836 86,654 77,69E 112,078 123,770 116,734 113,679 114,737 112,821 112,663 117,819 101,314 95,77' Source: Various City departments Note: The City prepared this schedule for the first time in 2006, therefore, some historical data is not readily available. NA: Data not available when this report was compiled. a The City Elections department runs general elections in even - numbered years and school district elections in odd - numbered years Number of votes cast tend to vary between even and odd - numbered years and based on presidential election cycles. b Daily average of water pumped from city wells, measured in thousands of gallons. 118 :ITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA :APITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION AST TEN FISCAL YEARS unction 'ublic Works Miles of streets City parking ramps 'ublic Safety Fire stations arks & Recreation .City parks Acreage of parks Park buildings tilities Wells Watermain miles Sanitary sewer miles Sewer connections ,rena Ice sheets Fiscal Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 . 2 2 2 2 2 2 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 1,552 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 18 18 18 18 18 19 1,9 19 18 18 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 13,984 13,984 14,851 14,851 14,851 14,851 14,851 13,933 13,933 13,933 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ource: Various City departments 119 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31, 2011 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31, 2011 Table of Contents Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance With Minnesota State Laws and Regulations Page 1 -2 Schedule of Findings and Responses 4 MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS City Council land Management City of Edina, Minnesota We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 7, 2012. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures. for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. (continued) -I- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. We noted certain matters that we reported to management of the City in a separate letter dated June 7, 2012. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, City Council, others within the City, federal awarding agencies and pass- through entities and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. /`Ja 1,0 t 114 or►- o'yQ ko. # 1 04.Js k. " r20L_d0s Pic/"CA (o.i .Q . June 7, 2012 -2- MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA. We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011; which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 7, 2012. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, promulgated by the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions covers seven main categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our study included all of the listed categories. The results of our tests indicate that, for the items tested, the City complied with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions, except as noted in the Schedule of Findings and Responses. The City's response to the finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Responses. We did not audit the City's response and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, City Council, others within the City, and the state of Minnesota and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. Ma i O A10,1-he o s e4/, June 7, 2012 -3- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard - Suite 410 - Minneapolis, MN 55416 - Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 - Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 - www.mmkr.com CITY OF EDINA Schedule of Findings and Responses Year Ended December 31, 2011 A. FINDINGS — FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT None. B. FINDINGS — MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE AUDIT 2011 -1 PAYMENT OF INVOICES Criteria — Minnesota Statute § 471.425, Subd. 2. Condition — Minnesota Statutes require prompt payment of local government bills within a standard payment period of 35 days from the receipt of goods and services for governing boards that meet at least once a month. Three disbursements tested were not paid within the statutory time limit. Context — Three out of twenty-five disbursements tested were not in compliance. This is a current year finding. Cause — This was an oversight by city personnel. Effect — Certain payments made to vendors were not paid within the timeframe as required by state statutes. Recommendation — We recommend that the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) review current procedures in place to ensure that all invoices are paid within statutory requirements. Corrective Action Plan Actions Planned — The City will review the procedures in place to ensure future compliance with the statute. Official Responsible — John Wallin, Finance Director. Planned Completion Date —June 30, 2012. Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding — The City is in agreement with this finding. Plan to Monitor — John Wallin, Finance Director, will review the accounting procedures in place to ensure invoices are paid within the required time limit in the future. -4- CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31, 2011 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPI ` COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31, 2011 Table of Contents Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance With Minnesota State Laws and Regulations Page 1 -2 Schedule of Findings and Responses 4 PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA MMK R_ Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA C E R T I F I E D PUBLIC James H. Eichten, CPA ACCOUNTANTS Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 7, 2012. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. (continued) -1- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952- 545 -0424 • Telefax: 952- 545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain. provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. We noted certain matters that we reported to management of the City in a separate letter dated June 7, 2012. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, City Council, others within the City, federal awarding agencies and pass- through entities and is not intended to be, and should -not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. � CA- t /4 O ✓1 +0�y V_ ka f I1 0 W 5 �C . � l�C 0.a c) s eA/, I CA C4 June 7, 2012 -2- MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 7, 2012. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, promulgated by the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions covers seven main categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our study included all of the listed categories. The results of our tests indicate that, for the items tested, the City complied with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions, except as noted in the Schedule of Findings and Responses. The City's response to the finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Responses. We did not audit the City's response and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, City Council, others within the City, and the state of Minnesota and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. Ma O y /✓f KrJ� o s (� �.o , /� June 7, 2012 J -3- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 • Telefax: 952- 545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com CITY OF EDINA Schedule of Findings and Responses Year Ended December 31, 2011 A. FINDINGS — FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT None. B. FINDINGS — MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE AUDIT 2011 -1 PAYMENT OF INVOICES Criteria — Minnesota Statute § 471.425, Subd. 2. Condition — Minnesota Statutes require prompt payment of local government bills within a standard payment period of 35 days from the receipt of goods and services for governing boards that meet at least once a month. Three disbursements tested were not paid within the statutory time limit. Context — Three out of twenty-five disbursements tested. were not in compliance. This is a current year finding. Cause — This was an oversight by city personnel. Effect — Certain payments made to vendors were not paid within the timeframe as required by state statutes. Recommendation — We recommend that the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) review current procedures in place to ensure that all invoices are paid within statutory requirements. Corrective Action Plan Actions Planned — The City will review the procedures in place to ensure future compliance with the statute. Official Responsible — John Wallin, Finance Director. Planned Completion Date — June 30, 2012. Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding — The City is in agreement with this finding. Plan to Monitor — John Wallin, Finance Director, will review the accounting procedures in place to ensure invoices are paid within the required time limit in the future. -4- Management Report for City of Edina, Minnesota December 31, 2011 MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC. ACCOUNTANTS To.the City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Edina, Minnesota's (the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. The purpose of this report is to provide comments resulting from our audit process and to communicate information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. We have organized this report into the following sections: • Audit Summary • Funding Cities in Minnesota • Governmental Funds Overview • Financial Trends and Analysis • Accounting and Auditing Updates We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit. This report is intended solely for the information and use of those charged with governance of the City, management, and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. June 7, 2012 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com i 11 it Ju lu ; The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged with governance of the City. OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GOVERNMENTAUDITING STANDARDS We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate to you the following information related to our audit. PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit. AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS Based on our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011: • We have issued an unqualified opinion on the City's basic financial statements. • We noted no matters involving the City's internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. • The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. • We reported one finding related to the City's compliance with Minnesota laws and regulations based on our testing related to timely payment of invoices. Minnesota Statutes require prompt payment of local government bills within a standard payment period of 35 days from the receipt of goods and services for governing boards that meet at least once a month. Three disbursements tested were not paid within the statutory time limit. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions" This statement established new fund balance classifications that comprise a hierarchy based primarily on the extent to which a government is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources reported in governmental funds. It also clarifies existing governmental fund type definitions to improve the comparability of governmental fund financial statements. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the basic financial statements in the proper period. 4- CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Where applicable, management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management, when applicable, were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as a whole. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS Accounting estimates are an integral part of the basic financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were as follows: • Depreciation — Management's estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. • Compensated Absences — Management's estimate is based on current rates of pay and sick leave balances. • Net Other Post - Employment Benefit (OPEB) Liabilities — Actuarial estimates of the net OPEB obligation is based on eligible participants, estimated future health insurance premiums, and estimated retirement dates. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop these accounting estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear. DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT For purposes of this report, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated June 7, 2012. -2- MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. OTHER INFORMATION IN DOCUMENTS CONTAINING AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules, supplementary financial information, and statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. -3- FUNDING CITIES IN MINNESOTA LEGISLATION The 2011 legislative session began with the state facing a projected budget deficit of $6.2 billion (later revised down to $5.0 billion in the February 2011 Economic Forecast) for the 2012 -2013 biennium. In addition, the 2010 election dramatically changed the state's political landscape. A Democratic Governor was in power for the first time since 1991, while Republicans had majority control of both the House and the Senate for the first time since 1971. Predictably, as the session progressed, the Governor and Legislature had difficulty agreeing on a state budget for the next biennium. Shortly after the 2011 regular session ended, the Governor vetoed eight major state appropriation bills and the omnibus tax bill passed by the Legislature, which left the majority of state agencies without a budget for the next fiscal year. This resulted in a shutdown of "nonessential" state agencies that began July 1, 2011 and effectively ended with the passing of appropriation bills in a special session on July 19th and 20th. The large projected budget deficit facing the 2011 Legislature was typical of the financial challenges the state has experienced in recent years. Unfavorable economic conditions have caused a steady deterioration of the state's financial condition, which has resulted in a series of cuts and holdbacks in state aids to local governments and other entities. As was the case in the last biennium, the Legislature utilized several one -time revenue sources, transfers, and accounting shifts to minimize the need for tax increases or state aid cuts to balance the state budget. The following is a summary of significant legislative activity passed in calendar year 2011 affecting the finances of Minnesota cities: Local Government Aid (LGA) and Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC). — One of the appropriation bills passed in the 2011 special session was the omnibus tax bill, which includes the appropriations for LGA and MVHC. The Legislature retroactively reduced the fiscal 2011 appropriation for LGA by approximately $102 million, leaving a total appropriation of $425.3 million for 2011 LGA. Minnesota cities will receive 2011 LGA equal to the lesser of their final 2010 LGA (after the cuts by the Legislature and Governor) or their 2011 certified LGA amount. The first half LGA payment for 2011 was also delayed one week to July 27, so the reduced LGA amounts could be recomputed after the government shutdown. The total LGA appropriation for fiscal 2012 will be $425.2 million, with cities again receiving the lesser of their 2010 actual or 2011 certified amounts. In essence, this bill extended the LGA cuts originally made in fiscal 2010 for the two subsequent years. For fiscal 2013 and beyond, the LGA appropriation is set at $426.4 million, to be allocated using the LGA formula. The omnibus tax bill also extended the 2010 MVHC reductions of approximately $48 million to fiscal 2011, with cities to receive the same allocation. Beginning in fiscal 2012, the MVHC reimbursement program is eliminated. Rather than receiving a property tax credit, qualifying homeowner taxpayers will have a portion of the market value of their house excluded from their taxable market value. This new system will provide homeowners property tax relief by shifting a portion of their potential tax burden to other property classifications, rather than directly reducing their taxes through a state paid tax credit reimbursement. While this new homestead exclusion is calculated in a similar manner to the repealed MVHC, the actual tax relief to individual homeowner taxpayers may vary significantly depending on the makeup of the taxing jurisdictions that levy on their particular property. The agriculture market value credit, however, will continue as a state -paid tax credit. -4- Levy Limitations — A 2008 law limited general operating property tax levy increases for cities with populations over 2,500 to an inflationary increase based on the state determined implicit price deflator (IPD) to a maximum of 3.9 percent annually for the next three calendar years. Modifications were made in subsequent legislative sessions to allow cities subject to levy limitation to declare "special levies" to replace the LGA and MVHC losses. The 2010 Legislature also established a floor of zero percent for the inflationary increase, so levies would not be reduced in the event of IPD deflation. The 2011 Legislature passed an omnibus tax bill during the regular session that would have extended levy limits for two years (taxes payable in 2012 and 2013). However, this was among the bills vetoed by the Governor, and the final omnibus tax bill passed in the special session did not address levy limits. Sales and Use Taxes — A number of changes and clarifications were made to Minnesota sales and use tax provisions, including: • Made water used directly for public safety purposes (fighting fires) exempt from sales tax. • Expanded the sales tax exemption for the, lease of motor vehicles used as ambulances to the lease of vehicles used for emergency response. • Added townships to the list of entities exempt from sales tax. • Provided an exemption from sales tax for technology and electricity for qualifying large data centers as a business incentive. • Clarified the sales tax regulations for online hotel sales. "Buy American" Provision Repealed — The `Buy American" provision, enacted in 2010, which prohibited public employers from purchasing or requiring employees to purchase any uniforms, safety equipment, or protective accessories not manufactured in the United States, was repealed. Cities may continue to purchase American-made uniforms and equipment, but they are not required to do so. Prohibition of Referendum Spending — Political subdivisions, including cities, are prohibited from expending funds to promote a referendum to support imposing a local option sales tax. The political subdivision may only expend funds to conduct the referendum. Tax Exempt Period for Economic Development Property — The maximum allowable holding period for property held by a political subdivision for economic development to be exempt from property taxes was increased from eight years to nine years. Concurrent Detachment of Parcels — State law for the concurrent detachment of property from one city to another has been changed. In the past, both cities involved had to support the change for it to be considered. Now, if the property owner and one of the involved cities petition for the detachment, the proposed boundary adjustment qualifies for consideration. Civil Immunity for Donated Public Safety Equipment — Immunity from civil tort claims is extended to municipalities that donate public safety equipment to another municipality, unless the claim is a direct result of fraud or intentional misrepresentation. The statute defines "public safety equipment" as vehicles and, equipment used in firefighter, ambulance and emergency medical treatment services, rescue, and hazardous material response. -5- PROPERTY TAXES Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities. In recent years this dependence has been heightened, as revenue from state aids and fees related to new development have dwindled due to the struggling economy. This has placed added pressure on local taxpayers already beset by higher unemployment, lower property values, and tighter credit markets. As a result, municipalities in general are experiencing increases in tax delinquencies, abatements, and foreclosures. This instability has led to significant fiscal challenges for many local governments, and increased the investing public's concerns about the security of the municipal debt market. Property values within Minnesota cities experienced average decreases of 3.0 percent and 5.7 percent for taxes payable in 2010 and 2011, respectively, reflecting the weak housing market and economic conditions experienced in recent years. In comparison, the City's taxable market value decreased 1.5 percent for taxes payable in 2010 and 5.2 percent for taxes payable in 2011. The market value for taxes payable in 2011 is based on estimated values as of January 1, 2010. The following graph shows the City's changes in taxable market value over the past 10 years: $10,500,000,000 $9,000,000,000 $7,500,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $4,500,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 Taxable Market Value 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 -6- Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state's property classification system to each property's market value. Each property classification, such as commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates. Consequently, a city's total tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the proportion of the City's tax base that is in each property classification from year -to -year, as well as legislative changes to tax rates. The City's tax capacity decreased 1.4 percent and 5.7 percent for taxes payable in 2010 and 2011, respectively. The following graph shows the City's change in tax capacities over the past 10 years: $130,000,000 $120,000,000 $110,000,000 $100,000,000 $90,000,000 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 Local Tax Capacity 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 The following table presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for each of the last two levy years, along with comparative state -wide and metro area rates. The general increase in rates reflects both the increased reliance of local governments on property taxes and the recent decline in tax capacities. Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity All Cities State -Wide 2010 2011 Average tax rate Seven -County Metro Area City of Edina 2010 2011 2010 2011 City 39.2 42.5 36.0 40.0 23.0 24.7 County 41.0 43.7 36.8 42.1 42.6 45.8 School 23.0 25.2 24.0 26.8 19.5 22.6 Special taxing 5.9 6.4 6.5 8.1 9.5 10.6 Total 109.1 117.8 103.3 117.0 94.6 103.7 The City's portion of the tax capacity rates for its residents has historically been well below the state -wide and metro area averages. -7- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's governmental funds. Governmental funds include the General Fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, and capital project funds. We have also included the most recent comparative state -wide averages available from the State Auditor. The reader needs to consider the effect of inflation and other known changes or differences when comparing this data. Also, certain data on these tables may be classified differently than how they appear on the City's financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state -wide information, particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures. We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify unique or unusual trends and activities of your city. We intend for this type of comparative and trend information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the Management's Discussion and Analysis. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population count, which for most years is based on estimates. GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUE The amounts received from the typical major sources of revenue will naturally vary between cities based on their particular situation. This would include the City's stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it provides, and other attributes. The following table presents the City's revenue per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with state -wide averages: Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the average Minnesota city, while having a lower tax rate, as shown on the previous table. Special assessment revenue decreased by $48 per capita, due to a significant decrease in special assessments for various projects completed in prior years. Licenses and permits increased by $6 per capita due to an increase in building permits for construction in the City. Intergovernmental revenues decreased $15 per capita mainly due to a decrease in municipal state aid funding in 2011. -8- State -Wide City of Edina Year December 31, 2009 December 31, 2010 2009 2010 2011 Population 20,000 - 100,000 20,000 - 100,000 48,169 47,941 48,262 Property taxes $ 391 $ 407 $ 495 $ 524 $ 517 Tax increments 59 56 158 94 85 Franchise taxes 36 30 14 14 15 Special assessments 62 66 56 141 93 Licenses and permits 27 29 44 50 56 Intergovernmental revenues 168 149 31 78 63 Charges for services 77 76 60 _ 63 66 Other 61 57 44 53 53 Total revenue $ 881 $ 870 $ 902 $ 1,017 $ 948 The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the average Minnesota city, while having a lower tax rate, as shown on the previous table. Special assessment revenue decreased by $48 per capita, due to a significant decrease in special assessments for various projects completed in prior years. Licenses and permits increased by $6 per capita due to an increase in building permits for construction in the City. Intergovernmental revenues decreased $15 per capita mainly due to a decrease in municipal state aid funding in 2011. -8- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS EXPENDITURES Similar to our discussion of revenues, the expenditures of governmental funds will vary from state -wide averages and from year -to -year, based on the City's circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows: • Current — These are typically the general operating -type expenditures occurring on an annual basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues. • Capital Outlay and Construction — These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more typically fluctuating significantly from year -to -year. Many of these expenditures are project- oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects. • Debt Service — Although the expenditures for the debt service may be relatively consistent over the term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt may be repaid with general property taxes. The City's expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with state -wide averages, are presented in the following table: The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state -wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's current operating costs are higher than average for public safety service costs, which is partially caused by the City having a full -time fire department. The increase in capital outlay expenditures of $13 more per capita than the prior year are due to energy efficiency upgrades. The City spent more on equipment replacements in the current fiscal year in addition to the City's portion of the burner project at the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility. Debt service expenditures for 2011 were $24 per capita more than the prior year, mainly due to the timing of bond related maturities. -9- Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class State -Wide City of Edina Year December 31, 2009 December 31, 2010 2009 2010 2011 Population 20,000 - 100,000 20,000 - 100,000 48,169 47,941 48,262 Current General government $ 79 $ 85 $ 143 $ 136 $ 119 Public safety 241 235 284 2% 304 Streets and highways 82 86 123 123 124 Parks and recreation 86 87 77 74 75 All other 96 91 — — — $ 584 $ 584 $ 627 $ 629 $ 622 Capital outlay and construction $ 267 $ 232 $ 477 $ 282 $ 295 Debt service Principal $ 126 $ 111 $ 154 $ 62 $ 93 Interest and fiscal charges 39 43 38 54 47 $ 165 $ 154 $ 192 $ 116 $ 140 The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state -wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's current operating costs are higher than average for public safety service costs, which is partially caused by the City having a full -time fire department. The increase in capital outlay expenditures of $13 more per capita than the prior year are due to energy efficiency upgrades. The City spent more on equipment replacements in the current fiscal year in addition to the City's portion of the burner project at the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility. Debt service expenditures for 2011 were $24 per capita more than the prior year, mainly due to the timing of bond related maturities. -9- FINANCIAL TRENDS AND ANALYSIS GENERAL FUND The City's General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal operations, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and parks and recreation. The graph below illustrates the change in the General Fund financial position over the last five years. Fund balance and cash balance are typically used as indicators of financial health or equity, while annual expenditures are often used to measure the size of the operation: General Fund Financial Position Year Ended December 31, $32,000,000 $28,000,000 $24,000,000 $20,000,000 $16,000,000 $12,000,000 $8,000,000 $4,000,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Fund Balance D Cash Balance (Net of Interfund Borrowing) Expenditures The City's General Fund cash and investments balance (net of interfund borrowing) at December 31, 2011 was $14,525,840. Total fund balance at December 31, 2011 was $13,473,216, which is an increase of $594,006 from the prior year, as compared to a budgeted decline in fund balance of $1,495,751. As the graph illustrates, the City has generally been able to maintain healthy cash and fund balance levels as the volume of financial activity has grown. This is an important factor because a government, like any organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. A healthy financial position allows the City to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and is a factor in determining the City's bond rating and resulting interest costs. A trend that is typical to Minnesota local governments, especially the General Fund of cities, is the unusual cash flow experienced throughout the year. The City's General Fund cash disbursements are made fairly evenly during the year other than the impact of seasonal services such as snowplowing, street maintenance, and park activities. Cash receipts of the General Fund are quite a different story. Taxes comprise about 71 percent of the fund's total annual revenue. Approximately half of these revenues are received by the City in July and the rest in December. Consequently, the City needs to have adequate cash reserves to finance its everyday operations between these payments. The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned fund balance for the General Fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned General Fund balance of 42 percent to 47 percent of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue. As of December 31, 2011, the City has $11,744,764 of unassigned fund balance in the General Fund, or 54.6 percent of 2012 budgeted tax revenue. This amount is $1,642,395 above the goal range identified in the policy. -10- The following chart reflects the City's General Fund revenue sources for 2011 compared to budget: General Fund Revenue Taxes Licenses and Permits Intergovemmental Charges for Services Other ■ Budget ❑ Actual General Fund revenue for 2011 was $29,087,822, which was $1,164,609 (4.2 percent) greater than budget. Licenses and permits revenue was over budget by $378,834 due to the unexpected increase in the number of projects during the year and an increase in the number of permits sold. Intergovernmental revenue was over budget by $161,726, primarily related to a youth sports grant received during the year. Charges for services were over budget by $374,062 due to an increase in the number of ambulance calls and services provided to residents, in addition to the City providing dispatching duties to a nearby metro city. Other revenues were over budget by $331,342 due to conservative budgeting measures for fines and forfeitures and rental revenues, as these can vary from year to year based on demand. The following graph presents the City's General Fund revenues by source for the last five years. The graph reflects the City's reliance on property taxes and other local sources of revenue, and shows the virtual elimination of general state -aid revenue in recent years. $22,000,000 $20,000,000 $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 General Fund Revenue by Source Year Ended December 31, 2011 Taxes Lice � oy e g Oth� s and P fimCn for r e d for few lt ■ 2007 02008 02009 ■ 2010 ❑ 2011 Total General Fund revenue for 2011 was $867,802 (3.1 percent) higher than last year. Charges for services and licenses and permits increased $214,798 and $304,383, respectively. These increases were for reasons previously discussed in the paragraph above. -11- The following graphs illustrate the components of General Fund spending for 2011 compared to budget: General Fund Expenditures Budget and Actual General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks �' °off °off °off °off °off °off °off °off °off c� c� cF� � o� c� ■ Budget o Actual Total General Fund expenditures for 2011 were $27,958,066, which was $730,247 (2.5 percent) under budget. Expenditures were under budget in most departments due to continued cost containment measures implemented by the City. General government costs were under budget by $275,210 (6.2 percent), mainly due to lower than expected costs for personal services. Public works expenditures were under budget by $469,825 (7.6 percent) mainly due to vacancies as a result of employee turnover in various positions. Parks costs were also under budget by $333,736 (8.7 percent) mainly due to lower than expected maintenance- related contractual services. Public safety expenditures were over budget by $348,524 (2.5 percent) due to a higher than expected salary increases in settled employment contracts. The following graph presents the City's General Fund expenditures by function for the last five years: $15,000,000 $13,500,000 $12,000,000 $10,500,000 $9,000,000 $7,500,000 $6,000,000 $4,500,000 $3,000,000 $1,500,000 General Fund Expenditures by Function Year Ended December 31, 2011 General Public Safety Public Works Parks Other Government ■ 2007 M2008 02009 ■ 2010 ❑ 2011 Total General Fund expenditures for 2011 were $739,056 (2.7 percent) higher than the previous year, with the most significant increase being in public safety ($541,804). This increase was mostly related to increases in personal services in the police, fire, and inspections department. -12- UTILITIES FUND The utility funds comprise a considerable portion of the City's activities. These funds help to defray overhead and administrative costs and provide additional support to general government operations by way of annual transfers. We understand the City is proactive in reviewing these activities on an ongoing basis and we want to reiterate the importance of continually monitoring these operations. Over the years we have emphasized to our city clients the importance of these utility operations being self - sustaining, preventing additional burdens on general government funds. This would include the accumulation of net assets for future capital improvements and to provide a cushion in the event of a negative trend in operations. The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Utilities Fund: $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Utilities Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 D Operating Revenue t• Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Utilities Fund ended 2011 with net assets of $56,260,192, an increase of $3,850,174 from the prior year. Of this, $46,507,471 represents the investment in utility distribution system capital assets, leaving $9,752,721 of unrestricted net assets. Utilities Fund operating revenue was $15,871,102 for 2011, up $836,221, or 5.6 percent, mostly due to an increase in rates during 2011. Operating expenses, including interest expense, were $286,980, or 2.4 percent more than last year, mainly due to increased depreciation expense. As the graph above illustrates, operating income increased significantly in fiscal 2011 due to the increased rates approved for fiscal 2011. -13- LIQUOR FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Liquor Fund: $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Liquor Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 a Sales � Cost of Sales � Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) The Liquor Fund ended 2011 with net assets of $2,780,277, an increase of $190,278 from the prior year. Of the net asset balance, $1,197,809 represents the investment in liquor capital assets, leaving $1,582,468 of unrestricted net assets. Liquor sales for 2011 were $13,172,484, an increase of $317,791 (2.5 percent) from the previous year. Sales have steadily increased over the last several years, increasing 15.2 percent since 2007. The Liquor Fund generated a gross profit of $3,524,324 in 2011, or 26.8 percent, of gross sales. The Liquor Fund gross profit margin has been similar for the last several years, ranging from 26.3 percent to 26.8 percent between 2007 and 2011. Operating expenses for 2011 were $2,078,946, which is $48,528, or 2.3 percent, lower than last year. SEE AQUATIC CENTER FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Aquatic Center Fund: $1,000,000 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Aquatic Center Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 o Operating Revenue Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Aquatic Center Fund ended 2011 with net assets of $2,570,645, an increase of $195,356 from the prior year. Of the net asset balance, $1,474,208 represents investments in aquatic center capital assets, $473,338 of unrestricted net assets, and $623,099 restricted for debt service. Aquatic Center Fund operating revenues for 2011 were $913,383, which is $32,146 (3.4 percent) lower than last year, mostly due to an decrease in usage during 2011 as the weather during the peak time of the season was not as favorable as 2010. Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2011, were $703,549, a decrease of $65,466 from the prior year. As the graph above illustrates, operating income increased in 2011 and was positive in each of the five years presented. -15- GOLF COURSE FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Golf Course Fund: $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $(500,000) Golf Course Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 o Operating Revenue Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Golf Course Fund ended 2011 with net assets of $2,335,824, a decrease of $5,208 from the prior year. Of this, $3,747,505 represents the investment in golf course land and capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($1,411,681) of unrestricted net assets. Golf Course Fund operating revenues for 2011 were $3,281,225, which is $161,979 (4.7 percent) less than the previous year, as the number of rounds played were down significantly from the previous year. Less than ideal weather conditions and fewer rentals were the primary contributing factors to the decrease in revenues. Operating expenses, including interest expense, for 2011 were $3,395,038, down $166,088 from the prior year. On an annual basis, this fund has had to borrow from other funds to fund cash flow needs. The interfund borrowing decreased $25,753 during 2011 to a total of $1,084,247, which includes an advance from other funds of $1,000,000 at December 31, 2011. Due to the cash flow losses over recent years, management has developed a plan to support operations of this fund by making a transfer from the Utilities Fund on an annual basis until the financial position improves. The transfer made during 2011 totaled $100,000. -16- ARENA FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Arena Fund: $2,000,000 $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $250,000 $(250,000) $(500,000) Arena Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 o Operating Revenue Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Arena Fund ended 2011 with net assets of $2,021,664, a decrease of $240,924 from the prior year. Of this, $2,059,406 represents the investment in the arena capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($37,742) of unrestricted net assets. Arena Fund operating revenues for 2011 were $1,315,435, $13,929 more than last year. Operating expenses, including interest expense, for 2011 were $1,772,734, an increase of $155,028 from the prior year. As the graph above illustrates, the operating loss has increased from the previous year, with an increase in the loss of $141,099. As can be seen in the above table, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from the Construction Fund and the Liquor Fund on an annual basis. These transfers totaled $216,962 in fiscal 2011. We recommend that the City continue to monitor the financial results in this fund, including continuing to update the long -range financial plan for this fund. -17- ART CENTER FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Art Center Fund: $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $(100,000) $(200,000) $(300,000) Art Center Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 OOperating Revenue Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) The Art Center Fund ended 2011 with net assets of $328,578, an increase of $24,708 from the prior year. Of this, $222,688 represents the investment in capital assets, leaving $105,890 of unrestricted net assets. Art Center Fund operating revenues for 2011 were $451,343, $23,244 more than the prior year. Operating expenses for 2011 were $615,172, which increased $9,069 from the prior year. As can be seen in the above table, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from the Liquor Fund on an annual basis. This transfer totaled $160,000 in fiscal 2011. An additional $15,000 was transferred from the Construction Fund to support operations of this fund in fiscal 2011. We recommend that the City continue to monitor the financial results in this fund and continue to update the long -range financial plan for this fund. OH! EDINBOROUGH PARK AND CENTENNIAL LAKES FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Fund: $2,400,000 $2,100,000 $1,800,000 $1,500,000 $1,200,000 $900,000 $600,000 $300,000 $(300,000) $(600,000) $(900,000) Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Fund Year Ended December 31, 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 o Operating Revenue Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) The Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Fund was recorded as one enterprise fund by the City in fiscal 2011. Current year operations included operating revenues of $1,879,793, an increase of $119,916, or 6.8 percent, from fiscal 2010. Operating expenses for 2011 were $2,299,288, an increase of $31,040 from the previous year. This fund was eliminated during the current year and two separate funds were created, the Edinborough Park Fund and Centennial Lakes Fund. The previously reported net assets of $2,636,318 and $1,493,375 were transferred to the Edinborough Park Fund and Centennial Lakes Fund, respectively. The assets and liabilities of the Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Fund were allocated to the new funds as applicable to the operations of each fund. We recommend that the City monitor the financial results in these new funds, in a similar manner to when these funds were reported as one operating fund. -19- GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City's financial statements include fund -based information that focuses on budgetary compliance, and the sufficiency of the City's current assets to finance its current liabilities. The GASB Statement No. 34 reporting model also requires the inclusion of two government -wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City as a single, unified entity. These government -wide statements provide information on the total cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long -term liabilities. Statement of Net Assets The Statement of Net Assets essentially tells you what your city owns and owes at a given point in time, the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net assets represent the resources the City has leftover to use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, the Statement of Net Assets divides the net assets into three components: net assets invested in capital assets, net of related debt; restricted net assets; and unrestricted net assets. The following table presents the components of City's net assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, for governmental activities and business -type activities: As of December 31, 2011 Net assets 2010 Increase (Decrease) Governmental activities Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 75,045,018 $ 69,783,162 $ 5,261,856 Restricted 22,915,776 9,952,443 12,963,333 Unrestricted 29,544,149 41,709,528 (12,165,379) Total governmental activities 127,504,943 121,445,133 6,059,810 Business -type activities Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 56,877,100 48,807,806 8,069,294 Restricted 623,099 618,852 4,247 Unrestricted 12,926,674 17,041,122 (4,114,448) Total business -type activities 70,426,873 66,467,780 3,959,093 Total net assets $ 197,931,816 $ 187,912,913 $ 10,018,903 The unrestricted net asset balance for the governmental and business -type funds decreased approximately $12.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively. The decrease is due in part to the City's investments .in new and rebuilt infrastructure made during the year. A portion of the change is due to the implementation of GASB Statement No. 54, which caused an increase in the restricted assets of the City. -20- Statement of Activities The Statement of Activities tracks the City's yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other transactions that increase or reduce total net assets. These amounts represent the full cost of providing services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund -based financial statements. This statement includes the cost of supplies used, depreciation of long -lived capital assets, and other accrual -based expenses. The following table presents the change in net assets of the City for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010: Total net (expense) revenue General revenues Property taxes and tax increments Franchise taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain on disposal of capital assets Total general revenues Change in net assets $ 72,765,780 $ 51,925,254 (20,840,526) (13,710,324) 29,124,216 29,610,186 722,160 692,288 881,688 680,409 131,365 62,168 30,859,429 31,045,051 $ 10,018,903 $ 17,334,727 One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side -by -side comparison to illustrate the difference in the way the City's governmental and business -type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and unrestricted grants. It also shows that, for the most part, the City's business -type activities are generating sufficient program revenues (service charges and program - specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the current downward pressures on the general revenue sources. -21 -> 2011 2010 Program Expenses Revenues Net Change Net Change Net (expense) revenue Governmental activities General government $ 7,0.13,231 $ 1,133,261 $ (5,879,970) $ (5,884,748) Public safety 16,024,575 6,833,496 (9,191,079) (9,129,533) Public works 9,193,336 6,315,402 (2,877,934) 4,799,799 Parks and recreation 5,540,585 513,575 (5,027,010) (4,851,302) Interest on long -term debt 2,339,370 101,976 (2,237,394) (2,528,424) Business -type activities Utilities 12,130,685 15,992,288 3,861,603 3,307,007 Liquor 11,727,106 13,172,484 1,445,378 1,262,421 Aquatic center 718,027 913,383 195,356 175,921 Golf course 3,390,949 3,285,741 (105,208) (118,369) Community activity centers 4,687,916 3,663,648 (1,024,268) (743,096) Total net (expense) revenue General revenues Property taxes and tax increments Franchise taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain on disposal of capital assets Total general revenues Change in net assets $ 72,765,780 $ 51,925,254 (20,840,526) (13,710,324) 29,124,216 29,610,186 722,160 692,288 881,688 680,409 131,365 62,168 30,859,429 31,045,051 $ 10,018,903 $ 17,334,727 One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side -by -side comparison to illustrate the difference in the way the City's governmental and business -type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and unrestricted grants. It also shows that, for the most part, the City's business -type activities are generating sufficient program revenues (service charges and program - specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the current downward pressures on the general revenue sources. -21 -> ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES GASB STATEMENT N0.60 — ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR SERVICE CONCESSION ARRANGEMENTS This statement provides accounting and financial reporting guidance for governments that participate as either a transferor or an operator in a service concession arrangement (SCA). SCAB are arrangements whereby a government transfers the rights to operate one of its capital assets to a third party operator (either a private party or another government) for consideration, with the operator then being compensated from the fees or charges collected in connection with the operation of the asset. To qualify as an SCA, an arrangement must meet all of the following criteria: 1) the transferor must convey to the operator both the right and the obligation to use one of its capital assets to provide services to the public; 2) the operator must provide significant consideration to the transferor; 3) the operator must be compensated from the fees or charges it collects from third parties; 4) the transferor must have the ability to either determine, modify, or approve what services are to be provided to whom at what price; and 5) the transferor must retain a significant residual interest in the service utility of the asset. This statement provides guidance to governments that are party to an SCA for reporting the assets, obligations, and flow of revenues that result from the arrangement; along with the required financial statement disclosures. The requirements of this statement must be implemented for periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with earlier implementation encouraged. GASB STATEMENT N0.61— THE FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY: OMNIBUS This statement amends the current guidance in GASB Statement No. 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity," for identifying and presenting component units. This statement changes the fiscal dependency criterion for determining component units. Potential component units that meet the fiscal dependency criterion for inclusion in the.financial reporting entity under existing guidance will only be included if there is also "financial interdependency" (an ongoing relationship of potential financial benefit or burden) with the primary government. This statement also clarifies the types of relationships that are considered to meet the "misleading to exclude" criterion for inclusion as a component unit; changes the criteria for blending component units; gives direction for the determination and disclosure of major component units; and adds a requirement to report an explicit, measurable equity interest in a discretely presented component unit in a statement of position prepared using the economic resources measurement focus. The requirements of this statement must be implemented for periods beginning after June 15, 2012, with earlier implementation encouraged. GASB STATEMENT N0.63 - FINANCIAL REPORTING OF DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND NET POSITION This statement provides financial reporting guidance for deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources; which are defined as the consumption or acquisition of net assets, respectively, applicable to a future reporting period. The statement amends certain reporting requirements in GASB Statement No. 34 and related pronouncements, providing a format for a new Statement of Net Position, which reports deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources separately from assets and liabilities. It also renames the residual of assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources as net position, rather than net assets. The requirements of this statement must be implemented for periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with earlier implementation encouraged. -22- GASB PENSION EXPOSURE DRAFTS In June 2011, GASB issued two exposure drafts on accounting and reporting for pensions, one for the reporting of pension benefits within the financial statements of participating employers and the other for pension plan financial reporting. These two exposure drafts are intended to update or replace the current guidance for pension reporting in GASB Statement Nos. 25 and 27. The exposure drafts propose a variety of changes in financial statement presentation, measurement, and required disclosures relating to pension benefits. Included are proposed major changes in how employers that participate in cost - sharing defined benefit pension plans, such as TRA and PERA, account for pension benefit expenses and liabilities. Currently, employers participating in such plans recognize pension expenses and liabilities only to the extent of their contractually required annual contributions to the plan. The exposure draft proposes that those employers. recognize their proportionate share of the collective net pension liability and collective pension expense for all participating employers. If adopted, this guidance could have a significant impact on the financial statements of the participating employers, as participants in plans with a substantial unfunded liability would be required to report their proportionate share of the unfunded liability in their government -wide financial statements. The proposed effective dates for both exposure drafts are for periods beginning after June 15, 2012, if certain conditions are met, otherwise for periods beginning after June 30, 2013. FEDERAL FUNDING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY ACT (TRANSPARENCY ACT) Effective October 1, 2010, the Transparency Act requires federal award recipients to report specific data, including compensation data in certain circumstances, related to subawards. One of the key requirements of the Transparency Act was the creation of a single, searchable website that provides the public with greater access to information on federal spending. The Transparency Act requires recipients to report first -tier subaward and executive compensation data for new federal grants as of October 1, 2010, if the initial award is equal to or over $25,000. Pass through entities (primary recipients) must report subaward data through the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) by the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation is made. For a more detailed discussion of the Transparency Act see Part 3, Section L of the 2011 U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A -133 Compliance Supplement available at www.whitehouse.gov /omb. The OMB has issued several documents that provide guidance on the Transparency Act, including Open Government Directive — Federal Spending Transparency and Subaward and Compensation Data Reporting, available at www.whitehouse.gov /omb /open. -23- CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA r� y I'S ` 00- no 2012 -2013 BUDGET EDINA CITY COUNCIL Mayor James Hovland Councilmember Joni Bennett Councilmember Mary Brindle Councilmember Josh Sprague Councilmember Ann Swenson CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNUAL BUDGET Transmittal Letter 1 City Management Budget Message 3-6 Financial Management Policies 7-12 Budget Summary — All Funds: Property Tax Levy 13 Budget Summary 14-20 Debt Summary 21 GENERALFUND General Fund Summary: General Fund Summary 22-25 Detail Revenue by Source 26-27 Detail Expenditures by Function 28-29 General Government: Overview 33 Mayor & Council 34-35 Administration 36-37 Communications 38-39 64-65 Planning 40-41 66-67 Finance 42-43 68-71 Election 44-45 72-73 Assessing 46-47 74-75 Legal & Court Services 48-49 76-77 Commissions & Special Projects 50-55 78-79 Public Works Overview 59 Administration 60-61 Engineering 62-63 Supervision 64-65 Payroll Distribution 66-67 Street Maintenance 68-71 Street Lighting 72-73 Traffic & Street Name Signs 74-75 Traffic Control 76-77 Bridges /Guard Rails 78-79 Retaining Wall Maintenance 80-81 Sidewalks /Ramps /Parking Lots 82-85 o e CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNUAL BUDGET Public Safety Overview 134-135 89 Police Protection 90-93 152-153 Animal Control 94-95 115 Fire Protection 96-97 117 Public Health 100-101 Centennial Lakes Inspections 102-103 Parks & Recreation Overview 134-135 107 Administration 108-109 152-153 Recreation 110— 115 Payroll Distribution 116— 117 Maintenance 118-129 Centennial Lakes Deer Control 130-131 III. OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) 134-135 Liquor Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 136-137 152-153 Police Special Revenue 138-139 Arena Braemar Memorial 140-141 158-159 Debt Service 142-143 Centennial Lakes Construction 144-145 IV. ENTERPRISE FUNDS Utilities 148-149 Liquor 150-151 Aquatic Center 152-153 Golf Course 154-155 Arena 156-157 Art Center 158-159 Edinborough Park 160-161 Centennial Lakes 162-163 V. Appendix Central Services Overview 167 General 168-169 City Hall 170-171 Public Works Building 172-173 Equipment Operation 174-175 fn N,� z O January 3, 2012 61--' Ol ,�dilld The City Council's Dec. 20, 2011, final approval of the 2012 City Budget was the culmination of a new process of creating the city government's annual operating and capital budgets. The new process integrated input from City staff with feedback from residents with policy direction from City Council Members to produce an operational plan for 2012 that has the support of all three. The process started in the first quarter of 2011 with a Quality of Life Survey conducted by public opinion research company Decision Resources, Ltd. The Quality of Life Survey provided City staff and Council Members with statistically valid and reliable information about how Edina residents feel about their community and their city government services. City staff used the Quality of Life Survey results to help build their operating plans and accompanying budgets for 2012 and 2013. These budget proposals were shared with the City Council during the summer of 2011 and given preliminary approval by the Council on Sept. 6, 2011. After its preliminary approval of the 2012 budgets, the City Council asked staff to go back to the community and seek their input and feedback on the budgets. To help us with this assignment, the City engaged the Citizens League to develop and facilitate a series of four public workshops for residents to learn more about the budgets and then to share their feedback, which was then shared with the City Council prior to the Council's final approval of the budget. Operationally, the 2012 City budget provides funding to continue our 2011 service levels. The Council also approved funding for the continued replacement and upgrade of the City's vehicle fleet; replacement of the city's website; development of a public Wi -Fi system for City facilities; improvements to the City's public buildings and facilities; three new positions in the areas of economic development, property and facility management, and environmental protection; and the pre - payment of more than $1.6 million in future debt obligations in order to provide property tax relief for present and future Edina residents and businesses. The 2012 City Budget is financially sound and operationally transparent. It represents the Council's faith in the feedback of its residents and the input of its City Staff. Through its competent implementation, it will continue to help produce a quality of life in Edina that is exceptional when compared to other American cities and, perhaps more importantly, what our residents have asked us to provide them. r, a r • City Manager City Hall -Gaol WEST 501E1 STREET EDIN'A, IINNESOTA, :5-5424 -1394 �vww.cityofeclina.com 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 T-TY 952 -826 -037/9 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY MANAGEMENT BUDGET MESSAGE ANNUAL BUDGET Presented herewith is the proposed 2012 -2013 City of Edina budget. Preparation of the 2012 -2013 budgets began with budget planning workshops on June 7 and August 16, 2011. Based on Council comments and guidance at the early workshops, staff prepared a draft budget and recommended maximum levy for Council consideration. Council passed a resolution at the September 6, 2011, meeting to set the preliminary 2012 levy, which was then certified to Hennepin County. The County will use the certification information to mail parcel - specific notices to property owners. A public hearing on the budget will be held on December 6, 2011. The Council is expected to pass a resolution approving the final budget and tax levy on December 20, 2011. The final tax levy must be equal to or less than the preliminary levy certified to the County. The budget format is essentially the same as in previous years, although there are a few changes in the 2012 -2013 budget. The Communications department is now part of the General fund and the Edinborough /Centennial Lakes fund is now two separate funds. The budget groups expenditures and expenses in the following basic categories: • Cost of goods sold (Enterprise funds only) • Personal services (wages, benefits, payroll taxes) • Contractual services • Commodities • Central services • Equipment (Governmental funds only) • Capital outlay (Governmental funds only) • Depreciation (Enterprise funds only) • Debt service • Other For comparative purposes, actual expenditures and expenses for the prior two years and the budget for last year are shown. Also included is a narrative description of departmental functions. TWO YEAR BUDGET The City of Edina switched to a two -year budget cycle for the 2012 -2013 budget years. The 2012 budget and related property tax levies were approved by the -3- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY MANAGEMENT BUDGET MESSAGE ANNUAL BUDGET City Council and certified to Hennepin County in December 2011. The 2013 budget and related levies were approved in concept by the City Council at the same time. During 2012 the proposed 2013 budget will be reviewed and modified, if necessary, before adoption by the City Council and certification to the County in December 2012. LOCAL ECONOMY The State of Minnesota released an economic forecast in February 2011 that projects a budget deficit for the state for the FY 2012 -2013 biennium of $5.0 billion. While subsequent economic updates have reported that revenues are above the February forecast, there has been no suggestion that it will be enough to significantly change the budget challenges that face the State. According to the October economic update, Minnesota's labor market has performed modestly better than the US averages. The state's unemployment rate has been consistently below the US rate and Minnesota has lost a smaller percentage of its jobs than the national average. The City of Edina is also experiencing some effects of the economic downturn. Building permit activity has dropped significantly from 2006 highs, although a 2011 rebound is projected to continue. Since the City is fully developed, permit revenue comes from a diverse mix of commercial, retail and residential redevelopment. The City has several large commercial projects in queue that are currently on hold. The City doesn't have any of the large new housing developments that seem to be causing problems for some other cities. The City's budget is under pressure from the sputtering economy in a variety of other ways. Foreclosures have risen but are still very low and unemployment continues to be manageable. In addition, low interest rates are resulting in lowered expectations for investment income. RECAP OF LEGISLATIVE CHANGES The 2011 legislature enacted significant changes to property tax laws. The legislature allowed the 2008 levy limit law to expire for the 2012 budget year. In addition, the state changed the Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) into the Market Value Homestead Exemption (MVHE). This change will have an effect on the way some properties in Edina are taxed, especially commercial properties and high value as well as non - homesteaded residential property. -4- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY MANAGEMENT BUDGET MESSAGE ANNUAL BUDGET GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The City is striving to stabilize taxes despite changes in the economic or legislative environment through a combination of conservative budgeting, long -term planning and strong financial policies. The City ended fiscal year 2010 with adequate fund balance in the general fund, including 47% of next year's budgeted tax revenue designated for cash flow, which is the maximum allowed under the City's fund balance policy. In addition, the City had $1,457,997 unreserved and undesignated fund balance in the general fund. Edina maintains its AAA rating from Standard & Poor's and Aaa rating from Moody's. These ratings are primarily based on the City's tax base, conservative financial practices, and moderate debt profile. Such ratings put Edina in good company as very few Cities achieve this rating level, which allows the City to borrow at attractive interest rates. BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS The 2012 -2013 budget maintains most current service levels despite the conflicting pressures of rising costs and small operating levy increases since 2010. However, many of the 2010 -2011 budget cuts will remain in place. Personnel costs remain the largest component of General fund expenditures, accounting for about 70% of our general fund budget. This amount includes health insurance and other benefits, which are not expected to change significantly in 2012. There are 2 new full -time positions included in the 2012 general fund budget compared to 2011. One is a new Storm Engineer in the Engineering Department, which will be mostly paid for by charging the Utility Fund for Engineering services provided by the new Engineer. The other new position is a Facility Manager who_ will oversee and manage the various buildings owned by the City. -5- a..1rr CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA of rs CITY MANAGEMENT BUDGET MESSAGE ANNUAL BUDGET PROPERTY TAXES The 2012 proposed General fund and Construction fund levy is $22,596,474, a 2.7% increase from 2011, and the total tax levy increase will be 1.8 %. The difference in rates is due to a decrease in the debt service levies made possible by a budget surplus in 2010. Under Minnesota's property tax system, a property's tax capacity is determined by multiplying the assessed market value of the property by the appropriate classification rate (i.e., residential, commercial, etc.). Local levies are then expressed as a percentage of tax capacity. The City of Edina's tax capacity rate had been decreasing until 2007. A combination of softening market values, levy increases and MVHC /MVHE changes has resulted in increasing rates since then. Tax Capacity & Tax Capacity Rate 120,000,000 30 29 100,000,000 28 80,000,000 27 26 60,000,000 25 24 40,000,000 23 20,000,000 22 21 20 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 oTax capacity -0—Tax capacity rate Edina's tax capacity rate is lower than most comparable cities. In a 2011 survey of 8 large suburban Hennepin County cities that surround Edina, our tax capacity rate of 24.660 was the lowest, and notably lower than the 42.126 average of the other 8 cities. CONCLUSION This budget represents the City's primary means of allocating resources to provide services in pursuit of our vision, which is to be the preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. PURPOSE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES ANNUAL BUDGET The City of Edina has a responsibility to provide quality services to its residents, and considers it important to do so in a fiscally responsible fashion designed to keep services and taxes as consistent as possible over time. These financial management policies are meant to serve as the framework upon which consistent operations may be built and sustained. OPERATING BUDGET POLICIES Scope. It is the City's policy to budget for all governmental and enterprise funds. Accounting. The governmental funds use the modified accrual basis of accounting for budgeting and reporting purposes. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities for the current period. The City considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments are recorded only when payment is due. The Enterprise Funds use the accrual basis of accounting for budgeting and reporting purposes. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenue in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Stakeholder Input. The annual budget process is intended to weigh all competing requests for City resources within expected fiscal constraints. Requests for new programs made outside the annual budget process are discouraged. The City will provide ample time and opportunity for public input into its budget process every year. -7- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES ANNUAL BUDGET Balanced Budget Adoption. The operating budget for the General Fund will be balanced. The City will not use internal or external short-term borrowing, asset sales, or one -time accounting changes to balance the General Fund budget. The balanced budget will include a reasonable annual appropriation for contingencies. Budgetary Controls. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level within the General Fund even though budgetary data is presented at lower levels (personal services, contractual services, commodities, and central services). Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year -end. The City Manager may approve budgetary transfers. The City Council may approve supplemental appropriations. Monitoring. Department Directors are responsible for administration of their respective department budgets. Such responsibility includes reviewing monthly financial reports to detect errors and assess progress, staying within budget authorization, and submitting requests for budget adjustments, when required. REVENUE POLICIES Policies. The City will endeavor to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system to shelter programs and services from short-term fluctuations in any single revenue source. Property Taxes. It is beneficial for residents and for the City to keep tax rates low and consistent from year to year. The City will strive to proactively avoid large increases in the operating budget levy. Fees and Charges. The City shall establish user charges and fees for General Fund program activities at a level related to the full cost of providing the services. Components of the user charges shall include direct and indirect costs of providing the service. The City will also consider policy objectives and market rates when setting fees. Transfers. Transfers should not be used as a revenue source to balance the operating budget except for the annual transfer from our liquor operations. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES ANNUAL BUDGET Investment Income. The City will reasonably budget for investment revenue in our operating budget based on the conservative investment strategy outlined in our investment policy (under separate cover). FUND BALANCE POLICIES Definitions. The term fund balance describes the net assets of the City's governmental funds calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP further divides fund balance into five categories; nonspendable fund balance, restricted fund balance, committed fund balance, assigned fund balance, and unassigned fund balance. • Nonspendable fund balance consists of amounts that cannot be spent because they are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items. • Restricted fund balance consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. • Committed fund balance consists of amounts that are constrained for specific purposes that are internally imposed by formal action (resolution) of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless City Council removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts. • Assigned fund balance consists of amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In governmental funds other than the general fund, assigned fund balance represents the remaining amount that is not restricted or committed. In the general fund, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the City Council. • Unassigned fund balance is the residual classification for the general fund and also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. Policies. At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain nonspendable and restricted fund balance equal to the amounts required by GAAP for a variety of purposes, including but not limited to: prepaid expenditures, park dedication fees, E -911 funds, forfeiture funds, and other assets restricted by grantors, contributors, creditors, or enabling legislation. At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain committed fund balance constrained for specific purposes by City Council. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES ANNUAL BUDGET At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain assigned fund balance in the General Fund for investments as calculated by the difference between market value and amortized value of investments held by the City at year -end. The City will also maintain assigned fund balance in the General Fund for Compensated Absences of 40% of the actual full - accrual General Fund liability for compensated absences. At the end of each fiscal year, the City's goal is to maintain unassigned fund balance for Cash Flow in the General Fund in a range equal to 42 -47% of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue. In the event that unassigned fund balance falls above or below the desired range, the Finance Director shall report such amounts to the City Council as soon as practicable after the end of the fiscal year. Should the actual amount of unassigned fund balance fall below the desired range, the City shall create a plan to restore the appropriate levels. Should the actual amount of unassigned fund balance fall above the desired range, any excess funds will remain unassigned pending the Council's final decision concerning transfer to another fund. It is the policy of the City that, to the extent possible, such excess funds will be transferred to the Construction Fund to support capital improvements and equipment. Available fund balances shall not be used for ongoing operating expenditures. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to first use restricted resources, then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned. CAPITAL OUTLAY POLICIES Equipment Replacement Program. The City strives to maintain its physical assets at a level that minimizes future repair and maintenance costs. To accomplish this goal, the City has established the Equipment Replacement Program to annually budget and set aside funds for the timely replacement of City equipment. -10- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES ANNUAL BUDGET The City's Equipment Replacement Program includes equipment used for General Fund programs. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The goal of the City's CIP is to develop a comprehensive program for use by decision makers to guide capital investments based on an assessment of the community's needs, taking into account the best use of limited resources while providing efficient and effective municipal services. The City will develop a five -year plan for capital improvements and update it annually. The CIP process includes analyzing projects contributing to the public health and welfare, projects helping to maintain and improve the efficiency of the existing systems, and projects that define a future need within the community. The City will identify the estimated cost and potential funding sources for each capital project proposal in the CIP. Purchase contracts for equipment and projects included in the CIP must still be properly authorized according to the City's Purchasing Policy. The CIP will include equipment and projects from any City fund. DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES Policy Limits. The City will use debt only for capital improvement or projects that have a life of more than 4 years. The City will avoid using debt for cash flow borrowing, operations, or repairs. When possible, the City will not use debt to finance equipment purchases when it is possible to purchase the equipment on a pay -as- you -go basis with equipment replacement program or capital improvement plan reserves. The City shall use G.O. tax increment bonds only when the development merits special consideration. The City's capital improvement plan shall contain debt assumptions which match this policy and requires a commitment to long -range financial planning which looks at multiple years of capital and debt needs. Legal Limits. Minnesota Statues, Section 475 prescribes the statutory debt limit that outstanding principal of debt cannot exceed 2% of taxable market value. This limitation applies only to debt that is wholly tax - supported. The type of debt - 11 - CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES ANNUAL BUDGET included is either general obligation debt of any size bond issue (G.O.) or lease revenue bond issues that were over $1,000,000 at the time of issuance. However, there are also several other types of debt that do not count against the limit. G.O. tax increment, G.O. special assessment, G.O. utility revenue, G.O. recreational facility revenue, and HRA- issued debt are considered to have a separate revenue source other than just taxes and are excluded from the legal debt limit calculation. Local ordinances do not limit the City's ability to issue debt. Issuance Practices. The City uses the competitive sale method for its general obligation bond sales unless factors such as structure, size or market conditions compel the use of a negotiated sale. The City may use an outside bond attorney, an independent financial advisor, and /or other service providers to assist with the structuring and sale of the bonds. Debt Structuring. The City's collective debt shall amortize at least 50% of its principal within 10 years. In all cases, the maturity shall be shorter than the life of the related assets. Conduit Debt. The City may participate in conduit debt financings. Development proposals are reviewed to determine if they meet program objectives and whether the proposals are financially feasible. Variable Rate Debt. The City may use variable rate debt to provide debt structuring flexibility and potential interest savings to the total debt portfolio. Variable rate debt should not constitute more than 20% of the City's total debt obligations. Refunding. Current refunding bonds may be utilized when present value savings of 3 %. of refunded principal is achieved or in concert with other bond issues to save costs of issuance. Advance refunding bonds may be utilized when present value savings of 4% of refunded principal is achieved. Adopted by City Council February 20, 2007 Revisions: March 20, 2007 December 15, 2009 December 20, 2011 -12- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX LEVIES ANNUAL BUDGET Property Tax Levies — All Funds Budget Budget 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 General Fund Levies 1.71% Debt Levy Increase (Decrease) 28.80% 29.27% -0.65% -3.65% 7.63% Total Property Tax Levy Increase 6.85% 5.549/6 1.159/6 1.799/6 2.53% General Operating Levy $20,193,052 $20,737,472 $21,004,000 $21,604,402 $21,989,994 Equipment Levy NOTE' 1,009,639 - - - General Fund Subtotal 21,202,691 20,737,472 21,004,000 21,604,402 21,989,994 Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service 1,040,436 1,039,561 949,850 950,800 949,850 Equipment Certificates 84,191 164,010 164,010 67,500 - Gymnasium Debt Service 180,000 381,793 396,444 411,644 396,444 Fire Station Debt Service 457,950 454,591 431,544 432,744 431,544 Public Works Facility Debt Service 588,453 1,172,802 1,232,460 1,178,202 1,536,743 Park Bond Market Value Levy 600,212 602,250 615,837 610,862 615,837 Debt Service Fund Subtotal 2,951,242 3,815,007 3,790,145 3,651,752 3,930,418 Construction Fund Levies Equipment Levy NOTE' - 940,494 992,072 992,072 992,072 Construction Fund Subtotal 940,494 992,072 992,072 992,072 Total Property Tax Levy $24,153,933 $25,492,973 $25,786,217 $26,248,226 $26,912,484 General + Equipment Levy Increase 4.37% 2.24% 1.47% 2.73% 1.71% Debt Levy Increase (Decrease) 28.80% 29.27% -0.65% -3.65% 7.63% Total Property Tax Levy Increase 6.85% 5.549/6 1.159/6 1.799/6 2.53% Tax Capacity Levy Increase NOTE 2 7.01% 5.68% 1.12% 1.86% 2.57% NOTE 1: Prior to 2010, the Equipment Replacement program was budgeted for in the General Fund. The Equipment Replacement program was moved to the Construction Fund for the 2010 budget year, meaning the levy also had to be moved. NOTE 2: Tax capacity levies include the general fund, city hall, equipment, gymnasium, fire station and public works levies. The Park Bond Market Value Referendum levy is a market value levy, and is excluded from this calculation, which results in different values. -13- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET Budget Summary - All Funds and Years 2013 Budget $ 26,912,484 2.5% (113,000) 2.7% 26,799,484 2.5% 3,990,000 0.3% 3,452, 321 7.9% 714,000 2.0% 2,602,500 3.0% 1,170,125 0.0% 3,188, 244 1.3% 1,091,821 1.9% 38,961,842 3.4% 492,550 2.0% 589,000 10.8% 2,464,250 -39.7% 3,451, 500 10.2% 3.000 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 100,438,935 $ 90,917,623 $ 87,861,881 -3.4% $ 88,970,637 1.3% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER 2010 2011 2012 6,629,599 $ Public works Actual Budget Budget Parks & recreation REVENUES AND OTHER Debt service 15,510,061 Utilities 11,119,053 FINANCING SOURCES 11,594,643 Aquatic center 751,767 Golf course Property tax levy $ 25,122,113 $ 25,786,217 $ 26,248,226 1.8% Reductions - (627,283) (110,000) -82.5% Net tax revenue 25,122,113 25,158,934 26,138,226 3.9% Tax increments 4,488,073 3,972,190 3,980,000 0.2% Special assessments 6,746,186 2,214,358 3,200,512 44.5% Franchise fees 692,288 650,000 700,000 7.7% Licenses and permits 2,410,314 2,309,490 2,526,600 9.4% Intergovernmental 4,068,378 5,623,063 1,170,125 -79.2% Charges for services 3,014,894 2,733,804 3,146,264 15.1% Fines and forfeitures 1,203,767 1,027,103 1,071,821 4.4% Operating revenue 35,767,789 37,447,392 37,690,588 0.6% Investment income 680,409 597,330 482,700 -19.2% Other revenue 881,624 434,500 531,800 22.4% Transfers 3,483,539 2,887,459 4,088,545 41.6% Debt issued 11,718,658 5,807,000 3,131,700 -46.1% Other financing sources 160,903 55,000 3,000 -94.5% 2013 Budget $ 26,912,484 2.5% (113,000) 2.7% 26,799,484 2.5% 3,990,000 0.3% 3,452, 321 7.9% 714,000 2.0% 2,602,500 3.0% 1,170,125 0.0% 3,188, 244 1.3% 1,091,821 1.9% 38,961,842 3.4% 492,550 2.0% 589,000 10.8% 2,464,250 -39.7% 3,451, 500 10.2% 3.000 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 100,438,935 $ 90,917,623 $ 87,861,881 -3.4% $ 88,970,637 1.3% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION -33.7% $ General government $ 6,629,599 $ Public works 15,017,174 Public safety 17,767,915 Parks & recreation 4,214,897 Debt service 15,510,061 Utilities 11,119,053 Liquor 11,594,643 Aquatic center 751,767 Golf course 3,543,558 Community activity centers 4,401,887 Transfers 3,483,539 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, 13,306,188 EXPENSES AND OTHER 13,898,203 FINANCING USES $ 94,034,093 $ EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE 10,238,202 $ 6,783,506 -33.7% $ 7,060,845 4.1% 17,339,068 11,595,886 -33.1% 14,611,664 26.0% 15,005,772 16,372,434 9.1% 15,956,978 -2.5% 4,555,913 4,889,768 7.3% 4,606,340 -5.8% 6,640,188 7,844,476 18.1% 6,670,685 -15.0% 13,225,463 13,306,188 0.6% 13,898,203 4.4% 12,338,481 11,916,531 -3.4% 12,173,699 2.2% 761,098 777,486 2.2% 889,386 14.4% 3,572,216 3,642,413 2.0% 3,711,336 1.9% 4,886,142 4,997,338 2.3% 5,131,312 2.7% 2,887,459 4,088,545 41.6% 2,464,250 -39.7% 9.9% Debt service 91,450,002 $ 86,214,571 -5.7% $ 87,174,698 1.1% Cost of goods sold $ 9,916,630 $ 10,661,958 $ 10,154,149 -4.8% $ 10,378,331 2.2% Personal services 27,073,939 27,768,654 29,306,990 5.5% 29,914,168 2.1% Contractual services 13,942,772 14,508,438 14,891,962 2.6% 15,250,387 2.4% Commodities 3,459,053 3,561,380 3,655,903 2.7% 3,777,759 3.3% Central services 3,955,762 4,373,424 4,450,668 1.8% 4,524,648 1.7% Equipment 1,244,480 927,587 1,797,309 93.8% 598,600 -66.7% Capital outlay 12,273,298 15,784,224 5,530,925 -65.0% 8,711,765 57.5% Depreciation 3,174,559 3,039,840 3,635,099 19.6% 3,994,960 9.9% Debt service 15,510,061 7,937,038 8,703,021 9.7% 7,559,830 -13.1% Transfers 3,483,539 2,887,459 4,088,545 41.6% 2,464,250 -39.7% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 94,034,093 $ 91,450,002 $ 86,214,571 -5.7% $ 87,174,698 1.1% CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET ASSETS $ 6,404,842 $ (532,379) $ 1,647,310 $ 1,795,939 -14- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET Combining Budget Summary - All Funds and Years 2012 Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds REVENUES AND OTHER Governmental FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 26,248,226 $ Reductions (110,000) Net tax revenue 26,138,226 Tax increments Special assessments Franchise fees Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Operating revenue Investment income Other revenue Transfers Debt issued Other financing sources TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 3,980,000 Governmental 3,200,512 700,000 Funds 2,526,600 - 1, 060,125 110,000 3,146,264 - 1,071,821 - - 37,690,588 300,700 182,000 516,800 15,000 2,993,545 1,095,000 3,131,700 - 2013 48,769,293 $ 39,092,588 $ 87,861,881 $ 48,824,245 $ 40,146,392 $ 88,970,637 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER Governmental Enterprise Total Funds Funds Total $ 26,248,226 $ 26,912,484 $ $ 26,912,484 (110,000) (113,000) 6,783,506 (113,000) 26,138,226 26,799,484 7,060,845 26,799,484 3,980,000 3,990,000 11,595,886 3,990,000 3,200,512 3,452,321 14,611,664 3,452,321 700,000 714,000 16,372,434 714,000 2,526,600 2,602,500 15,956,978 2,602,500 1,170,125 1,060,125 110,000 1,170,125 3,146,264 3,188,244 - 3,188,244 1,071,821 1,091,821 - 1,091,821 37,690,588 - 38,961,842 38,961,842 482,700 322,800 169,750 492,550 531,800 574,000 15,000 589,000 4,088,545 1,574,450 889,800 2,464,250 3,131,700 3,451,500 12,173, 699 3,451,500 3,000 3,000 777,486 3,000 889,386 889,386 Golf course 48,769,293 $ 39,092,588 $ 87,861,881 $ 48,824,245 $ 40,146,392 $ 88,970,637 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION General government $ 6,783,506 $ $ 6,783,506 $ 7,060,845 $ $ 7,060,845 Public works 11,595,886 11,595,886 14,611,664 14,611,664 Public safety 16,372,434 16,372,434 15,956,978 15,956,978 Parks & recreation 4,889,768 4,889,768 4,606,340 4,606,340 Debt service 7,844,476 7,844,476 6,670,685 6,670,685 Utilities - 13,306,188 13,306,188 - 13,898,203 13,898,203 Liquor 11,916,531 11, 916, 531 12,173, 699 12,173, 699 Aquatic center 777,486 777,486 889,386 889,386 Golf course 3,642,413 3,642,413 3,711,336 3,711,336 Community activity centers - 4,997,338 4,997,338 - 5,131,312 5,131,312 Transfers 2,668,445 1,420,100 4,088,545 1,024,150 1,440,100 2,464,250 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 50,154,515 $ 36,060,056 $ 86,214,571 $ 49,930,662 $ 37,244,036 $ 87,174,698 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold $ $ 10,154,149 $ 10,154,149 $ - $ 10,378,331 $ 10,378,331 Personal services 21,813,763 7,493,227 29,306,990 22,283,191 7,630,977 29,914,168 Contractual services 5,556,548 9,335,414 14,891,962 5,590,371 9,660,016 15,250,387 Commodities 1,673,097 1,982,806 3,655,903 1,726,184 2,051,575 3,777,759 Central services 3,269,952 1,180,716 4,450,668 3,325,716 1,198,932 4,524,648 Equipment 1,797,309 - 1,797,309 598,600 - 598,600 Capital outlay 5,530,925 - 5,530,925 8,711,765 - 8,711,765 Depreciation - 3,635,099 3,635,099 3,994,960 3,994,960 Debt service 7,844,476 858,545 8,703,021 6,670,685 889,145 7,559,830 Transfers 2,668,445 1,420,100 4,088,545 1,024,150 1,440,100 2,464,250 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 50,154,515 $ 36,060,056 $ 86,214,571 $ 49,930,662 $ 37,244,036 $ 87,174,698 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET ASSETS $ (1,385,222) $ 3,032,532 $ 1,647,310 $ (1,106,417) $ 2,902,356 $ 1,795,939 -15- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET Budget Summary - 2012 Governmental Funds OTHER FINANCING USES $30,848,166 $ 3,044,045 $ 145,365 $ 353,654 $ 25,000 $ 7,844,476 $ 7,893,809 $50,154,515 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ $ 1,053,955 $ - $ (190,473) $ (21,700) $ (312,910) $ (1,914,094) $ (1,385,222) -16- Braemar Debt General HRA CDBG Police SR Memorial Service Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $21,604,402 $ $ $ $ $ 3,651,752 $ 992,072 $26,248,226 Reductions (110,000) - (110,000) Net tax revenue 21,494,402 3,651,752 992,072 26,138,226 Tax increments - 3,980,000 - - 3,980,000 Special assessments - - 1,871,169 1,329,343 3,200,512 Franchise fees 700,000 - 700,000 Licenses and permits 2,501,600 25,000 2,526,600 Intergovernmental 760,000 145,365 104,760 50,000 1,060,125 Charges for services 3,096,264 - 50,000 3,146,264 Fines and forfeitures 1,014,000 57,821 - 1,071,821 Investment income 118,000 600 300 30,200 151,600 300,700 Other revenue 516,800 - - - - - 516,800 Transfers 765,100 1,978,445 250,000 2,993,545 Debt issued - 3,131,700 3,131,700 Other financing sources 3,000 - 3,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $30,848,166 $ 4,098,000 $ 145,365 $ 163,181 $ 3,300 $ 7,531,566 $ 5,979,715 $48,769,293 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION General govemment $ 5,513,041 $ 865,600 $ 145,365 $ $ $ $ 259,500 $ 6,783,506 Public works 6,490,886 200,000 4,905,000 11,595,886 Public safety 14,976,971 353,654 1,041,809 16,372,434 Parks & recreation 3,867,268 - 25,000 997,500 4,889,768 Debt service - - - 7,844,476 - 7,844,476 Transfers - 1,978,445 - - 690,000 2,668,445 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $30,848,166 $ 3,044,045 $ 145,365 $ 353,654 $ 25,000 $ 7,844,476 $ 7,893,809 $50,154,515 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $21,542,917 $ 171,600 $ 10,702 $ - $ - $ $ 88,544 $21,813,763 Contractual services 4,407,247 694,000 134,663 85,574 25,000 210,064 5,556,548 Commodities 1,629,442 - 18,655 - 25,000 1,673,097 Central services 3,268,560 - 1,392 3,269,952 Equipment - - - 1,797,309 1,797,309 Capital outlay 200,000 249,425 5,081,500 5,530,925 Debt service - 7,844,476 - 7,844,476 Transfers 1,978,445 - 690,000 2,668,445 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $30,848,166 $ 3,044,045 $ 145,365 $ 353,654 $ 25,000 $ 7,844,476 $ 7,893,809 $50,154,515 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ $ 1,053,955 $ - $ (190,473) $ (21,700) $ (312,910) $ (1,914,094) $ (1,385,222) -16- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET Budget Summary - 2013 Governmental Funds OTHER FINANCING USES $31,439,838 $ 4,445,380 $ 145,365 $ 243,654 $ 25,000 $ 6,670,685 $ 6,960,740 $49,930,662 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER $22,283,191 85,574 25,000 208,281 FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Braemar Debt 1,726,184 Personal services $22,006,930 $ General HRA CDBG Police SR Memorial Service Construction 1,682,529 - - Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER 3,000,000 Debt service - Transfers FINANCING SOURCES 559,350 _ TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND Property tax levy $21,989,994 $ $ $ $ $ 3,930,418 $ 992,072 $26,912,484 Reductions (113,000) - - (113,000) Net tax revenue 21,876,994 3,930,418 992,072 26,799,484 Tax increments - 3,990,000 - - 3,990,000 Special assessments - 2,072,269 1,380,052 3,452,321 Franchise fees 714,000 - - 714,000 Licenses and permits 2,577,500 25,000 2,602,500 Intergovernmental 760,000 145,365 104,760 50,000 1,060,125 Charges for services 3,138,244 - - 50,000 3,188,244 Fines and forfeitures 1,034,000 - 57,821 - 1,091,821 Investment income - 169,000 600 300 30,000 122,900 322,800 Other revenue 574,000 - - - - - 574,000 Transfers 765,100 559,350 250,000 1,574,450 Debt issued - - 3,451,500 3,451,500 Other financing sources 3,000 - 3,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $31,439,838 $ 4,159,000 $ 145,365 $ 163,181 $ 3,300 $ 6,592,037 $ 6,321,524 $48,824,245 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION General government $ 5,515,850 $ 886,030 $ 145,365 $ $ $ $ 513,600 $ 7,060,845 Public works 6,611,664 3,000,000 - 5,000,000 14,611,664 Public safety 15,380,984 - 243,654 332,340 15,956,978 Parks & recreation 3,931,340 - 25,000 650,000 4,606,340 Debt service - - 6,670,685 - 6,670,685 Transfers 559,350 - 464,800 1,024,150 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $31,439,838 $ 4,445,380 $ 145,365 $ 243,654 $ 25,000 $ 6,670,685 $ 6,960,740 $49,930,662 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER $22,283,191 85,574 25,000 208,281 FINANCING USES - BY TYPE 18,655 25,000 1,726,184 Personal services $22,006,930 $ 175,030 $ 10,916 $ Contractual services 4,426,067 711,000 134,449 Commodities 1,682,529 - - Central services 3,324,312 Equipment - Capital outlay 3,000,000 Debt service - Transfers 559,350 _ TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND - $ - $ $ 90,315 $22,283,191 85,574 25,000 208,281 5,590,371 18,655 25,000 1,726,184 - 1,404 3,325,716 - 598,600 598,600 139,425 5,572,340 8,711,765 - 6,670,685 - ARd G(M 6,670,685 4 110A IGyl OTHER FINANCING USES $31,439,838 $ 4,445,380 $ 145,365 $ 243,654 $ 25,000 $ 6,670,685 $ 6,960,740 $49,930,662 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ - $ (286,380) $ - $ (80,473) $ (21,700) $ (78,648) $ (639,216) $ (1,106,417) -17- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY FUNCTION Utilities Budget Summary - 2012 Enterprise Funds $ - $ $ $ $ $ Aquatic Golf Art $13,306,188 Liquor 11,916,531 Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Center Edinborough Centennial 11,916,531 Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND 777,486 Golf course 3,642,413 TRANSFERSIN 3,642,413 Community activity centers Operating revenues $16,065,043 $13,328,045 $ 933,800 $ 3,650,700 $ 1,355,400 $ 470,000 $ 1,151,600 $ 736,000 $37,690,588 Intergovernmental 110,000 110,000 Imestment income 98,000 42,000 42,000 182,000 Other revenue - TRANSFERS OUT 15,000 $13,236,631 $ 777,486 $ 15,000 Transfers 674,226 $ 1,552,334 $ 100,000 405,000 165,000 220,000 205,000 1,095,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OUT -BY TYPE TRANSFERS IN $16,273,043 $13,328,045 $ 933,800 $ 3,750,700 $ 1,760,400 $ 650,000 $ 1,413,600 $ 983,000 $39,092,588 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY FUNCTION Utilities $13,306,188 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $13,306,188 Liquor 11,916,531 11,916,531 Aquatic center - 777,486 777,486 Golf course 3,642,413 3,642,413 Community activity centers 1,829,580 674,226 1,552,334 941,198 4,997,338 Transfers 100,000 1,320,100 1,420,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,406,188 $13,236,631 $ 777,486 $ 3,642,413 $ 1,829,580 $ 674,226 $ 1,552,334 $ 941,198 $36,060,056 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT -BY TYPE COGS $ $ 9,628,249 $ 38,000 $ 349,400 $ 1,500 $ 22,000 $ 99,000 $ 16,000 $10,154,149 Personal services 1,695,124 1,414,961 319,127 1,790,101 662,326 249,614 783,210 578,764 7,493,227 Contractual services 6,836,237 483,702 127,575 580,650 552,600 284,500 331,500 138,650 9,335,414 Commodities 1,038,650 64,356 84,850 368,100 87,750 55,500 182,200 101,400 1,982,806 Central services 619,452 212,664 18,984 140,112 42,084 39,612 56,424 51,384 1,180,716 Depreciation 2,365,000 112,599 175,000 404,500 400,000 23,000 100,000 55,000 3,635,099 Interest 751,725 - 13,950 9,550 83,320 858,545 Transfers 100,000 1,320,100 1,420,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,406,188 $13,236,631 $ 777,486 $ 3,642,413 $ 1,829,580 $ 674,226 $ 1,552,334 $ 941,198 $36,060,056 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ 2,866,855 $ 91,414 $ 156,314 $ 108,287 $ (69,180) $ (24,226) $ (138,734) $ 41,802 $ 3,032,532 -18- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS Budget Summary - 2013 Enterprise Funds Aquatic Golf OUT - BY FUNCTION Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Center Edinborough Centennial $ Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND 12,173,699 Aquatic center - 889,386 TRANSFERS IN 889,386 Golf course - Operatingre\enues $ 16,819,093 $13,600,099 $ 944,000 $ 3,745,050 $ 1,455,400 $ 476,500 $ 1,163,700 $ 758,000 $38,961,842 Intergmemmental 110,000 - - 958,590 - - - - 110,000 Imestment income 98,000 - 1,440,100 - 33,250 38,500 169,750 Other re\enue 15,000 $13,998,203 $13,513,799 $ 15,000 Transfers $ 1,887,431 $ 683,016 $ 1,602,275 $ 100,000 255,000 272,800 215,000 47,000 889,800 TOTAL REVENUES AND OUT - BY TYPE TRANSFERSIN $17,027,093 $13,600,099 $ 944,000 $ 3,845,050 $ 1,710,400 $ 764,300 $ 1,411,950 $ 843,500 $40,146,392 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY FUNCTION Utilities $13,898,203 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $13,898,203 Liquor 12,173,699 12,173,699 Aquatic center - 889,386 889,386 Golf course - 3,711,336 3,711,336 Community actiWy centers - - 1,887,431 683,016 1,602,275 958,590 5,131,312 Transfers 100,000 1,340,100 - 1,440,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,998,203 $13,513,799 $ 889,386 $ 3,711,336 $ 1,887,431 $ 683,016 $ 1,602,275 $ 958,590 $37,244,036 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ - $ 9,836,831 $ 39,200 $ 356,800 $ 1,500 $ 22,000 $ 105,000 $ 17,000 $10,378,331 Personal seMces 1,725,272 1,441,291 325,400 1,823,446 674,551 254,198 797,479 589,340 7,630,977 Contractual seNces 7,092,708 494,108 133,400 597,750 579,650 286,750 335,000 140,650 9,660,016 Commodities 1,056,250 65,525 111,050 383,900 87,750 57,000 187,700 102,400 2,051,575 Central services 630,348 215,484 19,236 141,840 42,660 40,068 57,096 52,200 1,198,932 Depreciation 2,600,000 120,460 250,000 404,500 420,000 23,000 120,000 57,000 3,994,960 Interest 793,625 - 11,100 3,100 81,320 - 889,145 Transfers 100,000 1,340,100 - 1,440,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,998,203 $13,513,799 $ 889,386 $ 3,711,336 $ 1,887,431 $ 683,016 $ 1,602,275 $ 958,590 $37,244,036 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ 3,028,890 $ 86,300 $ 54,614 $ 133,714 $ (177,031) $ 81,284 $ (190,325) $ (115,090) $ 2,902,356 -19- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Overview BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET The budget summary on pages 13 -19 includes revenues and other financing sources of $87,861,881 in 2012 and $88,970,637 in 2013. Total revenues and other financing sources are expected to decrease 3.4% in 2012 and increase 1.3% in 2013. This budget is "balanced" according to our operating budget policies because General fund revenues and other financing sources are equal to expenditures and other financing uses. Revenues and Other Financing Sources The largest single source of revenue for both years shown in this budget is property taxes, accounting for 30% of the citywide revenue budget. The General Fund levies property taxes to support governmental operations (public safety, parks, public works, etc.), the Debt Service Fund levies property taxes to make principal and interest payments on debt issued in prior years, and the Construction Fund levies property taxes for the Equipment Replacement Program. All enterprise operating revenues combined are expected to be $37,690,588 in 2012 and $38,961,842 in 2013, or about 43% of citywide revenue; although these revenues come from a variety of different sources. For instance, this category includes water sales from our Utility enterprise, liquor sales from our Liquor enterprise, and class registration revenue from our Art enterprise. Expenditures, Expenses and Other Financing Uses Total expenditures, expenses and other financing uses are expected to total $86,214,571 and $87,174,698 in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Since revenues are expected to be greater, this budget level assumes an increase in existing fund balance and /or net assets for both budget years. The largest increases of fund balance occur in the HRA and Utility funds, which each have large construction projects that may occur in 2012 and beyond that may require cash balances in those funds. The largest expenditures /expenses by function are for public safety and utilities at 19% and 16% of total expenditures /expenses, respectively. The utilities expenses are fully covered by utility revenue, whereas the public safety expenditures require property tax support. The largest expenditure /expense by type is for personal services, at $29,306,990 in 2012 and 29,914,168 in 2013, or about 34% of the overall expenditure /expense budget. This category includes all wages and benefits for all full -time and part-time employees. The City has approximately 275 full -time employees and an additional 600 -650 part-time employees in a typical year. -20- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Debt Summary — All Funds (In Thousands) DEBT SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET $100,000 ❑ Enterprise Revenue i i ■Public Imp. (PIR) $75, 000 i € r i` F OTax Increment $50,000 ❑Public Project $25,000 ■General Obligation 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 This graph includes some estimates for bonds that may be issued in future years based on information available at the time of publication. Of the bond types shown here, only General Obligation and Public Project bonds are payable solely from general property taxes, and therefore are responsible for the "Debt Service" portion of the levy included in this budget. Due in part to its relatively low level of General Obligation and Public Project debt outstanding, the City maintains the highest "Aaa" and "AAA" ratings from Moody's and Standard and Poors, respectively. The other bond types are payable from other revenue sources, including water and sewer revenues, special assessments, golf course green fees, tax increments and others. The City's overall debt levels have been increasing since 2006. The City's infrastructure is aging and we are repairing streets, water and sewer pipes and other infrastructure on an aggressive schedule that is requiring us to issue new debt. In addition, the construction of a new city hall, two gymnasiums, major renovations of fire station #1, and relocation of the City's public works facility in recent years have also required new debt issues. Despite these pressures, the City's debt is still manageable and is not expected to be a burden when planning future budgets. -21 - CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET General Fund Budget The General fund is the primary operating fund for all basic City services, including administration, public works, police, fire, parks and other activities. General Fund Revenues and Other Financing Sources General Fund Revenues Other revenues 1.8% T ransfers Fines & forfeits 2.4% 3.3% Intergovernmen' ta I 2. 7 Charges for X services 10.0% License & permit 8.2% Taxes 69.6% 1 Franchisetaxes 2.3% -22- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET The main source of revenue in the General Fund is property taxes, accounting for about 70% of General Fund revenue. The proposed General Fund tax levy increased 2.9% from 2011, but the City expects to receive 3.9% more revenue. This is due to decreased expectations for delinquencies, abatements and other losses as the economy appears to be stabilizing. Building permit revenue, which is part of the licenses and permits category, appears to have peaked in 2006 and decreased through 2009. A slight rebound occurred in 2010 that we are projecting to continue through 2013, although it may take years to return to the 2006 permit revenue amounts. Ambulance revenue, which is part of the fees and charges category, varies based on numbers of patients transported and the rates paid by those patients. The City accepts Medicare assignment, which means that we are subject to Medicare reimbursement rates for all Medicare patients. These reimbursement rates are much lower than the rates set by the City Council and tend to be lower than what the City receives from patients who are covered by private insurers. Other revenue includes investment income and other miscellaneous revenue. Investment income was very low starting in 2009 and is expected to continue through 2013 due to low interest rates. The other financing sources category includes transfers from the Liquor Fund, which will not be increasing in 2012 or 2013. 35,000,000 I Transfers 30,000,000 Other revenues 25,000,000 0 Fines &forfeits 20,000,000 ❑ Charges for se ry ices 15,000,000 ❑ Intergovernmental 10,000,000 01 License & permit 5,000,000 ® Franchise taxes i _ -- - ❑ Taxes 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual i Actual Budget Budget Budget -23- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET General Fund Expenditures and Other Financing Uses Budgeted expenditures in the General Fund will increase 4.6% and 1.9% in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Nearly half of the General Fund's expenditure budget is spent on Public Safety. Public Safety includes the Police, Fire, Health and Inspections Department. General Fund Expenditures by Function 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 o2011 10,000,000 ❑2012 8,000,000 6,000,000 2013 4,000,000 2,000,000 ................................... . ................................... ................................... . General Public Works Public Safety Parks and Government Recreation 70% of General Fund expenditures are for personal services, including over $12 million for Public Safety personal services. General Fund Expenditures by Type 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 Personal Contractual Commodities Central Services Services Services -24- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND SUMMARY General Fund Balance ANNUAL BUDGET General Fund balance is considered an important indicator of a local government's financial health. Fund balance may be used to cover revenue shortfalls or unanticipated expenditures and can help to stabilize property taxes. The City has adopted a fund balance policy to guide decision - making about what appropriate fund balance levels are and how to allocate them. In Minnesota, cities generally must wait six months after year -end to receive the first full property tax settlement from the county. For this reason, the City's current fund balance policy recommends year -end fund balance designated for cash flows equal to 42 -47% of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue. 11,000,000 50.0% 9,000,000 45.0% 7,000,000 5,000,000 40.0% 3,000,000 1,000,000 t 35.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Estimated Proposed Proposed oFund Balance for Cash Flow —6—Ratio The graph on this page shows that the while the City's General Fund balance has grown almost every year since 2006, it has remained relatively stable when expressed as a percentage of subsequent year's tax revenue and within the 42 -47% guideline, raising only slightly in 2009 when the fund balance policy was modified. Although it is too early to know actual results for 2011, the City's estimates show little change in the dollar amount designated for cash flow, which would still provide reserves sufficient to meet our fund balance policy guidelines. The 2012 and 2013 budgets are balanced and therefore call for no dollar change in General Fund balance or fund balance designated for cash flow. However, because projected property tax revenue is expected to rise each year, the percentage drops slightly. Despite the decrease, the City believes that these fund balance levels will be adequate and within the policy guidelines of 42 to 47 percent. -25- CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 26 FUND: -T GENERAL REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED TAXES: PROPERTY TAXES $19,712,348 $20,405,035 $21,004,000 $21,004,000 $21,604,402 $21,989,994 PENALTIES AND INTEREST 20,180 39,552 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 LOSS DUE TO ABATEMENTS - - 147,000 327,000 122,000 125,000 19,732,528 20,444,587 20,869,000 20,689,000 21,494,402 21,876,994 TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES FRANCHISE FEES 667,791 692,288 700,000 650,000 700,000 714,000 20,400,319 21,136,875 21,569,000 21,339,000 22,194,402 22,590,994 TOTALTAXES LICENSE AND PERMITS: HEAT /VENT LICENSE 26,235 29,315 30,000 30,000 30,000 31,000 BUILDING PERMITS 1,217,654 1,427,857 1,575,000 1,421,990 1,590,000 1,640,000 PLUMBING PERMITS 124,114 122,848 125,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 HEATING PERMITS 23,360 25,981 45,000 10,000 15,000 18,000 MECHANICAL PERMITS 264,097 283,919 270,000 270,000 275,000 280,000 GRADING /EXCAVATION PERMITS 5,192 3,471 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 DOG LICENSES 40,535 59,492 50,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 BEER LICENSE 10,642 12,429 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 WINE LICENSE 15,075 19,667 22,000 25,000 24,000 25,000 LIQUOR LICENSE 145,083 151,570 165,000 142,000 155,000 160,000 PARKING RAMP 3,375 3,500 3,500 3,300 3,400 3,500 OTHER PERMITS & LICENSES 7,386 7,536 3,500 3,000 3,500 3,600 SPRINKLER PERMITS 23,017 29,579 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,500 ALARM PERMITS 11,509 15,149 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 TOBACCO LICENSE 5,600 5,840 5,000 10,000 8,000 8,000 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE 96,472 106,907 105,000 95,000 97,000 100,000 FOOD VENDING LICENSE 1,125 1,695 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 POOL LICENSE 26,052 25,125 25,000 24,000 24,200 25,000 AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE 1,695 1,365 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,600 LODGING LICENSE 931 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 GARBAGE COLLECTORS LICENSE 11,435 19,075 11,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 PARKING GARAGE LICENSE 4,005 4,546 4,000 3,200 3,500 3,800 SIGN PERMIT 11,730 18,613 17,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 ROAD RESTRICTION PERMITS 4,820 8,462 10,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 2,081,139 2,383,941 2,529,000 2,309,490 2,501,600 2,577,500 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AID: FEDERAL AID 104,906 21,442 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 STATE AID MAINTENANCE 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 OTHER STATE AID 126,973 109,645 120,000 51,000 60,000 60,000 STATE POLICE AID 338,684 332,572 340,000 355,000 350,000 350,000 STATE HEALTH AID 119,086 119,035 120,000 120,000 119,000 119,000 884,649 777,694 811,000 757,000 760,000 760,000 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENT AID CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 27 FUND: GENERAL REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED CHARGES FOR SERVICES: BUILDING DEPARTMENT $ 29,132 $ 23,997 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 CITY CLERK 8,862 97,429 10,000 6,000 76,000 6,500 FIRE DEPARTMENT 31,237 22,683 20,000 30,000 20,000 20,000 AMBULANCE 1,556,146 1,648,575 1,700,000 1,545,000 1,638,000 1,720,000 POLICE DEPARTMENT 172,878 183,568 300,000 200,000 260,000 270,000 ENGINEERING 210,071 155,524 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 6,580 12,933 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 16,536 24,857 20,000 27,500 25,000 25,000 HOUSING FOUNDATION CONTRACT 37,870 35,748 30,000 26,000 27,000 28,000 SERVICES HRA 28,377 21,812 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 PARK REGISTRATION FEES 103,530 112,048 103,000 98,000 100,000 105,000 SENIOR CENTER FEES 94,525 90,636 90,000 98,000 98,000 98,000 COMMUNICATIONS DEPT 101,679 76,383 66,500 66,500 70,000 74,000 OTHER FEES 1,540 1,090 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 50TH & FRANCE ASSESSMENT 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS 392,880 393,168 395,604 395,604 474,564 484,044 2,860,843 2,969,451 3,042,804 2,800,304 3,096,264 3,138,244 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE FINES AND FORFEITURES: MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 1,148,440 1,162,973 1,025,000 975,000 1,014,000 1,034,000 OTHER REVENUES: INCOME ON INVESTMENTS 58,220 138,287 139,919 139,919 128,800 161,000 RENTAL OF PROPERTY 191,136 270,333 245,000 200,000 240,000 255,000 PARK RENTAL 151,310 154,672 125,000 125,000 130,000 140,000 DONATIONS 28,367 28,798 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 15,039 2,789 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 444,072 594,879 527,919 482,919 516,800 574,000 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES TOTAL REVENUE $27,819,462 $29,025,813 $29,504,723 $28,663,713 $30,083,066 $30,674,738 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: TRANSFER FROM LIQUOR 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 . 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $28,584,562 $29,790,913 $30,269,823 $29,428,813 $30,848,166 $31,439,838 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 28 FUND: GENERAL I EXPENDITURE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED GENERAL FUND: GENERAL GOVERNMENT: MAYOR & COUNCIL $ 83,051 $ 80,605 $ 89,214 $ 89,439 $ 90,901 $ 92,400 ADMINISTRATION 1,058,779 993,159 1,163,278 1,152,578 1,133,089 1,139,130 COMMUNICATIONS 671,125 640,128 807,755 807,755 795,782 809,275 PLANNING 446,818 430,420 475,791 477,791 482,380 491,496 FINANCE 661,888 640,289 688,694 695,644 691,950 706,267 ELECTIONS 135,824 231,047 152,930 209,710 273,961 155,989 ASSESSING 799,777 783,444 796,142 853,189 858,412 884,877 LEGAL & COURT SERVICES 339,744 347,418 388,000 388,000 388,500 388,500 COMMISSIONS & PROJECTS 481,500 670,885 533,948 597,848 798,066 847,916 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 4,678,506 $ 4,817,395 $ 5,095,752 $ 5,271,954 $ 5,513,041 $ 5,515,850 PUBLIC WORKS: ADMINISTRATION $ 195,897 $ 192,190 $ 199,312 $ 228,954 $ 236,466 $ 240,213 ENGINEERING 1,033,268 1,000,249 1,052,245 1,052,245 1,195,773 1,219,126 STREET MAINTENANCE 4,368,099 4,440,456 4,748,982 4,944,909 5,058,647 5,152,325 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS $ 5,597,264 $ 5,632,895 $ 6,000,539 $ 6,226,108 $ 6,490,886 $ 6,611,664 PUBLIC SAFETY: POLICE PROTECTION $ 7,563,311 $ 7,928,548 $ 7,971,304 $ 7,981,304 $ 8,507,088 $ 8,790,126 ANIMAL CONTROL 89,955 94,411 91,981 91,981 93,106 94,786 FIRE PROTECTION 4,312,002 4,441,662 4,467,214 4,467,214 4,684,950 4,776,459 PUBLIC HEALTH 482,446 483,190 511,602 511,602 524,454 530,722 INSPECTIONS 994,324 1,000,502 1,089,492 1,089,492 1,167,373 1,188,891 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $13,442,038 $13,948,313 $14,131,593 $14,141,593 $14,976,971 $15,380,984 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-29 FUND: GENERAL EXPENDITURE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PARK & RECREATION: ADMINISTRATION $ 713,133 $ 728,216 $ 772,416 $ 779,416 $ 795,994 $ 810,719 RECREATION 377,235 336,344 396,467 420,702 425,045 430,457 MAINTENANCE 2,479,287 2,395,975 2,578,844 2,656,295 2,646,229 2,690,164 TOTAL PARK DEPARTMENT $ 3,569,655 $ 3,460,535 $ 3,747,727 $ 3,856,413 $ 3,867,268 $ 3,931,340 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $27,287,463 $27,859,138 $28,975,611 $29,496,068 $30,848,166 $31,439,838 OTHER FINANCING USES: TRANSFER TO CIP 50,000 - - - - - TRANSFER TO OTHER 700,000 936,499 2,483,530 - - - 750,000 936,499 2,483,530 - - - TOTAL OTHER FINANCING TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $28,037,463 $28,795,637 $31,459,141 $29,496,068 $30,848,166 $31,439,838 TOTAL CHANGES IN GENERAL FUND BALANCE $ 547,099 $ 995,276 $ (1,189,318 ) $ 67,255 $ - $ - This page left blank intentionally. f. lw General Government This page left blank intentionally. General Government Expenditure Summary General Government Expenditures by Function a 2011 ■ 2012 i 2013 1,400,000 — - - -- 1,200,000 - ; I 1,000,000 9f 1 800,000 600,000 - -- - 400,000 - 200,000 J ♦ &'0 ♦ G G �\ey�e sec Qio, � •�t` o Q' c'� 4y °ta a� cc� � °� • °�5 �a� P C,° a�4� •`y5` -33- CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 34 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT MAYOR & COUNCIL 1100 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Mayor & Council -1100: The City Council constitutes the policy- making division of Edina City Government. The Council is composed of the Mayor and 4 Council members, all elected at large for overlapping terms of four years. The Mayor is the official head of City Government and is the presiding officer at the Council meetings. The Council meets on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at City Hall. The City Council also serves as the commissioners of the Housing Redevelopment Authority. Total Mayor & Council Budget 2011 2012 $ 89,439 $ 90,901 2013 % 1.63% $ 92,400 1.65% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-35 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT I MAYOR & COUNCIL 1100 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 41,700 $ 41,381 $ 41,806 $ 41,806 $ 42,211 $ 43,055 6030 PENSIONS 1,661 1,681 3,031 3,031 3,061 3,122 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 2,706 2,685 3,198 3,198 3,227 3,292 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 83 79 71 71 70 71 46,150 45,826 48,106 48,106 48,569 49,540 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 715 241 1,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 1,835 2,175 2,800 1,700 1,700 1,700 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 5,555 6,210 7,500 6,400 10,000 10,000 8,105 8,626 11,300 12,100 13,700 13,700 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,214 1,116 1,800 1,225 1,500 1,500 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 11,391 9,472 9,876 9,876 8,604 8,676 6804 CITY HALL 16,191 15,565 18,132 18,132 18,528 18,984 27,582 25,037 28,008 28,008 27,132 27,660 TOTAL MAYOR & COUNCIL $ 83,051 $ 80,605 $ 89,214 $ 89,439 $ 90,901 $ 92,400 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-36 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 1120 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Administration -1120: Personal services consists of 6.85 full -time employees in this area. The office of the City Manager is responsible for executing the policies adopted by the City Council. Specifically, the City Manager's office provides for the general management of the City and is responsible for the following: . Personnel compensation and benefits administration for approximately 900 full -time and part- time employees Labor relations with four organized bargaining units . Risk management . Long range planning . Maintenance of official records and minutes . Publication of ordinances and legal notices . Licensing . Policy research and implementation . Management of selected central services . Human relations . Staff service to the HRA . Employee training and career development Explanation of Change: . 1.15 FTEs were transferred to the Communications Department from the Administration Department related to the front desk /switchboard activities at City Hall. . 0.25 FTEs were transferred to the Building Department from the Administration Department related to the front desk/switchboard activities at City Hall. Energy and Environment Commission -1122: The Energy & Environment Commission was established in April 2007 to help the City stay on the forefront of issues of sustainability. Total Administration Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 1,152,578 $ 1,133,089 -1.69% $ 1,139,130 0.53% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 37 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION 1120 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED ADMINISTRATION - 1120: PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 671,810 $ 627,183 $ 715,916 $ 715,916 $ 699,605 $ 700,137 6011 OVERTIME 10,794 13,227 8,080 8,080 8,242 8,407 6030 PENSIONS 46,112 44,767 54,193 54,193 49,652 50,645 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 48,693 46,827 52,648 52,648 48,207 49,171 6040 FLEX PLAN 54,980 59,532 79,200 79,200 65,760 67,075 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,079 1,924 2,333 2,333 2,591 2,643 834,468 793,460 912,370 912,370 874,057 878,078 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,534 29,909 43,000 28,500 50,500 50,500 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 10,380 2,620 7,500 7,500 8,000 8,000 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 53,328 43,440 54,000 49,000 53,800 53,800 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 1,382 1,477 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 6107 MILEAGE 14,123 3,036 4,000 10,000 4,000 4,000 6120 LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS 17,019 16,119 19,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 6160 DATA PROCESSING HR 31,009 31,839 32,000 32,000 33,000 34,000 6188 TELEPHONE 2,256 2,344 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 142,031 130,784 163,500 152,000 174,800 175,800 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 247 219 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 519 812 1,000 1,500 1,000 1,000 6575 PRINTING - 115 300 100 500 500 766 1,146 2,300 3,100 3,000 3,000 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 43,879 41,292 49,536 49,536 45,120 45,504 6804 CITY HALL 18,900 18,161 23,748 23,748 24,264 24,864 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 1,417 1,996 1,824 1,824 1,848 1,884 64,196 61,449 75,108 75,108 71,232 72,252 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $ 1,041,461 $ 986,839 $ 1,153,278 $ 1,142,578 $ 1,123,089 $ 1,129,130 ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT -1122: PERSONAL SERVICES: SALARIES & BENEFITS $ 2,747 $ 2,221 $ - $ - $ - $ - 2,747 2,221 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,571 4,099 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 14,571 4,099 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 TOTAL ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT $ 17,318 $ 6,320 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $ 1,058,779 $ 993,159 $ 1,163,278 $ 1,152,578 $ 1,133,089 $ 1,139,130 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-38 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1130 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Communications -1130: While communications has always been an integral part of local government, the City of Edina's Communications & Marketing Department was formally established in 2006. The department consists of 4.65 full -time employees, 7 part-time employees and 2 interns. It's the job of the Communications & Marketing Department to help other City departments and facilities identify what information and messages need to be conveyed to Edina's diverse audiences and make sure that this is done in the most effective manner possible. It is also the department's responsibility to find opportunities to promote what makes Edina the great community that it is and the successes of City government. In addition to media and public relations, the Communications & Marketing Department is responsible for publication of the City's internal and external newsletters and magazines, maintaining the website, administering Edina Community Channel 16 ( EDINA 16), and marketing the City and its enterprise facilities through customer analysis and advertising. Newsletters and magazines currently published include About Town, City Slick and Council Connection. Explanation of Change: . 1.15 FTEs were transferred to the Communications Department from the Administration Department related to the front desk /switchboard activities at City Hall. Total Communications Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 807,755 $ 795,782 -1.48% $ 809,275 1.70% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 39 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I GENERAL GOVERNMENT I COMMUNICATIONS 1130 SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 SALARY REG EMP $ 199,177 $ 217,141 $ 232,332 $ 232,332 $ 289,100 $ 306,882 6013 SALARY TEMP EMP 78,230 66,228 57,570 57,570 58,721 59,895 6030 PENSIONS 17,060 18,984 21,018 21,018 25,216 25,720 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 21,468 21,690 22,178 22,178 26,608 27,140 6040 FLEX PLAN 18,137 17,568 33,600 33,600 44,640 45,533 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 950 1,002 1,275 1,275 1,623 1,655 335,022 342,613 367,973 367,973 445,908 466,825 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 84,014 62,598 42,750 42,750 35,000 35,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 3,973 2,364 7,500 7,500 9,000 9,000 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,931 4,896 1,520 1,520 2,150 2,150 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 62 2,010 500 500 600 600 6107 MILEAGE 5,379 2,858 6,000 6,000 7,500 7,500 6122 ADVERTISING OTHER - - 500 500 500 500 6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER 116,322 87,165 85,200 85,200 90,200 90,200 6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 28,268 27,126 159,600 159,600 86,000 61,000 6136 PROF SERVICES OTHER 13,663 18,494 17,000 17,000 24,000 24,500 6188 TELEPHONE 1,640 1,377 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 6235 POSTAGE 7,169 58 3,500 3,500 500 3,500 262,421 208,946 326,070 326,070 258,450 236,950 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24,532 52,734 32,500 32,500 2,000 2,000 6408 PHOTO SUPPLIES 331 1,945 - - 2,000 2,000 6410 VIDEO SUPPLIES - - - - 11,300 12,000 6575 PRINTING 19,195 4,634 20,000 20,000 20,000 32,500 44,058 59,313 52,500 52,500 35,300 48,500 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6802 PERSONAL SERVICES 5,832 5,520 5,400 5,400 - - 6803 GENERAL 21,481 21,512 32,280 32,280 32,088 32,364 6804 CITY HALL 2,311 2,224 23,532 23,532 24,036 24,636 29,624 29,256 61,212 61,212 56,124 57,000 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS $ 671,125 $ 640,128 $ 807,755 $ 807,755 $ 795,782 $ 809,275 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-40 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I GENERAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING 1140 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Planning -1140: Personal services consists of 3.85 full -time employees in this area. The Planning Department provides staff service to the City Council, the Planning Commission, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, the Heritage Preservation Board, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the East Edina Housing Foundation. The department also handles the administration of the City's sign ordinance, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, nuisance ordinance, the Metro Rental Assistance Program, the Federal Community Development Block Grant program, and East Edina Housing Foundation programs. Total Planning Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 477,791 $ 482,380 0.96% $ 491,496 1.89% CITY OF EDINA ANNUALBUDGET PAGE - 41 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT I PLANNING 1140 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 290,592 $ 294,294 $ 292,840 $ 292,840 $ 300,218 $ 306,222 6011 OVERTIME 5,418 1,248 9,090 9,090 9,272 9,457 6030 PENSIONS 19,847 20,781 21,890 21,890 22,438 22,887 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 21,286 21,080 23,098 23,098 23,676 24,150 6040 FLEX PLAN 34,356 34,708 36,960 36,960 36,960 37,699 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,083 1,184 1,175 1,175 1,436 1,465 372,582 373,295 385,053 385,053 394,000 401,880 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,863 7,000 26,000 24,000 26,000 26,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 1,569 631 3,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 505 615 700 700 800 800 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 456 37 2,500 1,000 2,000 2,500 6107 MILEAGE 3,464 1,226 3,000 4,500 3,500 3,500 6188 TELEPHONE 615 686 750 750 800 900 24,472 10,195 35,950 36,950 38,100 38,700 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 419 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6575 PRINTING - - 500 500 2,000 2,000 - 419 3,500 4,500 6,000 6,000 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 35,121 32,445 34,896 34,896 27,528 27,756 6804 CITY HALL 14,643 14,066 16,392 16,392 16,752 17,160 49,764 46,511 51,288 51,288 44,280 44,916 TOTAL PLANNING $ 446,818 $ 430,420 $ 475,791 $ 477,791 $ 482,380 $ 491,496 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-42 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE 1160 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Finance - 1160: Personal services consists of 5.25 full -time employees in this area. The Finance Department provides accounting and control services for all financial activities of the City. Major functions include: • During 2010, the Finance Department issued 500 payroll checks and 15,000 direct deposits for 900 full -time and part-time employees. • Issuance of 12,500 accounts payable checks on expenditures of over $81,000,000 for general operating, debt service, capital projects, enterprise activities, and other City functions during 2010. • Preparation of the annual budget, comprehensive annual financial report, capital improvement plan, enterprise profit and loss statements, bond statements, and other financial reports. • Performing financial analysis on investments and various proposals. • Treasury management for $68,000,000 in cash and investments (as of December 31, 2010) and debt management of $96,000,000 in bonds. • Compliance with sales and use tax laws as well as other various taxes. Total Finance Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 695,644 $ 691,950 -0.53% $ 706,267 2.07% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-43 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE 1160 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 402,460 $ 387,993 $ 407,907 $ 407,907 $ 405,724 $ 416,838 6011 OVERTIME 2,585 504 1,500 6,060 3,000 3,060 6030 PENSIONS 27,312 27,144 30,013 30,013 29,632 30,225 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 30,499 29,159 30,970 30,970 30,385 30,993 6040 FLEX PLAN 49,777 47,769 50,400 50,400 50,400 51,408 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,207 1,202 1,268 1,268 1,483 1,513 513,840 493,771 522,058 526,618 520,624 534,037 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 1,810 2,726 4,500 4,000 4,000 4,000 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,127 1,250 1,500 1,500 1,700 1,700 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 140 227 160 150 150 150 6107 MILEAGE 2,063 544 1,200 2,000 1,000 1,000 6130 ANNUAL AUDIT 11,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6160 DATA PROCESS ING -LOGIS 80,420 79,900 84,000 86,000 87,000 87,000 96,560 95,647 103,360 105,650 105,850 105,850 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 1,354 763 300 1,400 1,000 1,000 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 882 2,801 3,000 2,000 2,400 2,500 2,236 3,564 3,300 3,400 3,400 3,500 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 34,598 33,231 43,572 43,572 45,312 45,708 6804 CITY HALL 14,654 14,076 16,404 16,404 16,764 17,172 49,252 47,307 59,976 59,976 62,076 62,880 TOTAL FINANCE $ 661,888 $ 640,289 $ 688,694 $ 695,644 $ 691,950 $ 706,267 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-44 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I GENERAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS 1180 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Elections - 1180: Personal services consist of 1 full -time person, of which half the salary is billed to the school district in school district election years as election costs. Personal services also includes the election judge payrolls for primary and general elections and payroll for additional hours of regular staff persons and temporary election staff. The City Clerk is responsible for conducting all national, state, county and City elections held in the City of Edina in even - numbered years. In addition, the City Clerk conducts all Edina School District 273 elections in odd - numbered years. Costs for conducting school elections are billed to the school district. The City is divided into 20 voting precincts which must be equipped for conducting each election. The Clerk must recruit and train approximately 350 election judges in each election year. In 2008 the City issued 7,495 absentee ballots during October with the anticipation that this number will grow each general election year. Since 2006 the City has been maintaining two pieces of equipment for each precinct; an optical scan ballot counter and an AutoMARK ballot marking device. Legislation passed in 2010 moved the Primary Election from September to August and increased the time allotted for absentee voting from 30 days to 46 days. This increased staff costs for maintaining Edina's "absentee voting" area. Increased demand for absentee voting also has increased staff costs. Part of the new legislation requires that cities administering absentee ballot use the State's Voter Registration Absentee Ballot Module to issue and administer ballots. Edina has experienced some increased costs with this implementation. The 2010 legislation also requires absentee ballots to be processed centrally and not sent out to individual polling locations for tabulations. At this point, staff believes this requirement will also increase personnel costs, but will improve consistency statewide. Explanation of Change: • Beginning in budget year 2012 the Elections Department will budget for the full anticipated cost of elections in even - numbered years vs. the much smaller cost of school district elections in odd - numbered years. • Approximately $9,000 was added to the postage category in 2012 to account for mailing out redistricting notifications. Total Elections Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 209,710 $ 273,961 30.64% $ 155,989 - 43.06% City of Edina Elections Individual BU Detail December Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Object Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget % of Budget Used 2013 2013 2012 Year Variance Year Variance % 2013 2013 REVENUE 4391 - OTHER FEES 91,554 (91,554) (100)% 4300:4399 - Total Charges for Services 91,554 (91,554) (100)% TOTAL REVENUE 91,554 (91,554) (100)% EXPENDITURES Election (1180): 6010 - SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES 6011 - SALARIES OT REGULAR 6013 - SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 6014 - SALARIES OT TEMP EMPLOYEES 6015 - SICK LEAVE 6017 - VACATION 6018 - HOLIDAYS 6030 - PENSIONS 6034 - SOCIAL SECURITY 6040 - HOSPITALIZATION 6045 - WORKERS COMPENSATION 6001:6099 - Total Personal Services 6103 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6104 - CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 6105 - DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 6106 - MEETING EXPENSE 6107 - MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 6120 - ADVERTISING LEGAL 6151 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL 6235 - POSTAGE 6101:6299 - Total Contractual Services 6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 6575 - PRINTING 6401:6699 - Total Commodities 6700:6799 - Total Capital Outlay 6803 - CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6801:6899 - Total Central Services (62,200) 62,200 (100)% (72,611) (10,084) 10,084 (100)% (16,172) (96,006) 96,006 (100)% (2,361) 2,361 (100)% (1,436) 1,436 (100)% (4,068) 4,068 (100)% (2,233) 2,233 (100)% (5,819) 5,819 (100)% (6,436) (8,326) 8,326 (100)% (6,792) (10,904) 10,904 (100)% (9,900) (512) 512 (100)% (141) (203,949) 203,949 (100)°% (112,052) (6,696) 6,696 (100)°% (10,000) 0 (110) (3,236) 3,126 (97)% (4,500) 2% (80) 80 (100)°% (225) (268) 268 (100)% 0 0 (650) 0 0 (200) (347) 347 (100)°% (1.130) 1,130 (100)°% (2,000) 0 (110) (11,756) 11,646 (99)% (17,575) 1% (4,080) 4,080 (100)`Yo (10,000) (1,603) 1,603 (100)°% (4,500) (5,684) 5,684 (100)% (14,500) 0 0 (12,408) 12,408 (100)°% (12,732) (12,408) 12,408 (100)°% (12,732) Page 1 of 2 City of Edina Elections Individual BU Detail December Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Object Actual Actual Actual Actual 2013 2013 2012 Year Variance Total Election Judges -City (1181): Total Judges -City Election- School (1182): Total Election -School Special Elections (1184): Total Special Elections __. I ..... ... _. __.__ _._...___._. TOTAL EXPENDITURES Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Actual Budget % of Budget Used Year Variance % 2013 2013 0 (110) (233,797) 233,687 (100)% (156,859) 0% 0 (110) (233,797) 233,687 (100)% (156,859) 0% NET INCREASE (DECREASE) 0 (110) (142,242) 142,132 (100)% (156,859) 0°% Page 2 of 2 City of Edina Elections Individual BU Detail December Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Object Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget % of Budget Used 2012 2012 2011 Year Variance Year Variance % 2012 2012 REVENUE 4391 - OTHER FEES 0 91,554 0 91,554 4300:4399 - Total Charges for Services 0 91,554 0 91,554 TOTAL REVENUE 0 91,554 0 91,554 EXPENDITURES Election (1180): 6010 - SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES 6011 - SALARIES OT REGULAR 6013 - SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 6014 - SALARIES OT TEMP EMPLOYEES 6015 - SICK LEAVE 6017 - VACATION 6018 - HOLIDAYS 6030 - PENSIONS 6034 - SOCIAL SECURITY 6040 - HOSPITALIZATION 6045 - WORKERS COMPENSATION 6001:6099 - Total Personal Services 6103 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6104 - CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 6105 - DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 6106 - MEETING EXPENSE 6107 - MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 6120 - ADVERTISING LEGAL 6151 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL 6235 - POSTAGE 6101:6299 - Total Contractual Services 6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 6575 - PRINTING 6401:6699 - Total Commodities 6700:6799 - Total Capital Outlay 6803 - CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6801:6899 - Total Central Services (6,279) (62,200) (45,368) (16,832) 37% (155,276) 40% 0 (10,084) (3,522) (6,561) 186% (15,855) 64% 0 (96,006) (24,539) (71.466) 291% 0 (2,361) 0 (2,361) (80) (1,436) (1,367) (69) 5% (744) (4,068) (4,715) 647 (14)% (319) (2,233) (1,875) (358) 19% (538) (5,819) (4,513) (1,306) 29% (12,407) 47% (555) (8,326) (5,245) (3,081) 59% (13,092) 64% (1,108) (10,904) (11,227) 322 (3)% (9,600) 114% (14) (512) (233) (279) 119% (308) 166% (9,638) (203,949) (102,605) (101,344) 99% (206,538) 99% (815) (6,696) (15,339) 8,644 (56)% (15,000) 45% 0 (3,236) (917) (2,319) 253% (4,500) 72% 0 (80) (80) 0 0% (250) 32% 0 (268) 0 (268) 0 0 0 (100) 100 (100)% (675) 0% 0 0 (243) 243 (100)% (400) 0% (347) (347) 0 (347) (750) 46% (910) (1,130) 0 (1,130) (14,940) 8% (2,072) (11,756) (16,679) 4,923 (30)% (36,515) 32% (474) (4,080) (3,852) (229) 6% (12,500) 33% 0 (1,603) (7,132) 5,529 (78)% (6,000) 27% (474) (5,684) (10,984) 5,300 (48)% (18,500) 31% 0 0 0 0 0 (1,034) (12,408) (14,460) 2,052 (14)% (12,408) 100% (1,034) (12,408) (14,460) 2,052 (14)% (12,408) 100% Page 1 of 2 City of Edina Elections Individual BU Detail December Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Dec YTD Object Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget % of Budget Used 2012 2012 2011 Year Variance Year Variance % 2012 2012 Total Election (13,219) (233,797) (144,728) (89,068) 62% (273,961) 85% Judges -City (1181): Total Judges -City Election - School (1182): Total Election-School Special Elections (1184): Total Special Elections TOTAL EXPENDITURES NET INCREASE (DECREASE) (13,219) (233,797) (144,728) (89,068) 62% (273,961) 85% (13,219) (142,242) (144,728) 2,486 (2)% (273,961) 52% Page 2 of 2 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 45 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS 1180 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETE BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 82,184 $ 156,638 $ 85,000 $ 109,477 $ 155,276 $ 88,400 6011 OVERTIME 2,188 11,717 2,500 15,544 15,855 2,600 6030 PENSIONS 4,402 5,065 4,500 9,064 12,407 4,680 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 5,228 7,462 5,300 9,564 13,092 5,512 6040 FLEX PLAN 10,547 10,152 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,984 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 358 509 213 213 308 222 104,907 191,543 107,113 153,462 206,538 111,398 a02, 9 11 ,05 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,093 13,864 9,800 12,000 ��� 15,000 10,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 3,926 1,678 2,500 4,500 31 aQ 4,500 4,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 349 219 219 - %0 250 225 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 7 - - - vp 6 - - 6107 MILEAGE 434 672 650 300 0 675 650 6120 LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT 21 393 200 300 343 400 200 6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - 695 - 600 141 750 - 6235 POSTAGE 1,838 868 2,000 5,600 1)3014,940 2,000 11,668 18,389 15,369 23,300 36,515 17,575 11 ,7 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6575 PRINTING 1,557 5,226 3,995 4,374 10,000 4,500 12,500 4,500 Uu'cv 12,500 1103 6,000 10,000 4,500 6,783 8,369 14,500 17,000 18,500 14,500 1 Al CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 12,466 12,746 15,948 15,948 X071 La 12,408 12,516 X33 1 -9l l 4b' 8 0 TOTAL ELECTIONS $ 135,824 $ 231,047 $ 152,930 $ 209,710 $ 273,961 $ 155,989 14) r� � C I � a CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-46 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT ASSESSING 1190 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Assessing -1190: Personal services consists of 7 full -time employees in this area. The Assessing Department conducts quintile field inspections (Minnesota Statute 273.08) and performs annual classification and valuation of Edina's 21,245 real estate parcels. In addition, once every six years the department must appraise all exempt properties. Accepted approaches (cost, market comparison, and income approach) to property valuation are considered in the appraisal process. Each year all tangible changes to property that may affect value are physically inspected using building permits as an informational source. Statistical analysis is performed on over 450 residential sales and existing assessor's market values each year, forming a basis for annual adjustments to value. Sales and the analysis of available income and expense data help determine adjustments to commercial, industrial, and apartment values. The department's work culminates each year with the Board of Appeal and Equalization. Hundreds of inquiries and reviews are handled each year prior to that meeting. Throughout the year, staff also manages appeals on commercial /industrial and apartment properties in Minnesota Tax Court. Hennepin County municipalities compare, coordinate, and discuss ratios of assessor's values to sale prices to assure an acceptable level of assessment and equity between jurisdictions. These ratios indicate the quality of our assessment and are monitored and corrected (if necessary) by the Department of Revenue. The Assessing Department is also responsible for certification and collection of special assessments. Total Assessing Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 853,189 $ 858,412 0.61% $ 884,877 3.08% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-47 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT ASSESSING 1190 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 516,925 $ 500,200 $ 500,200 $ 525,730 $ 528,199 $ 550,763 6030 PENSIONS 34,345 34,897 34,897 38,115 38,294 39,060 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 39,493 36,783 36,783 40,218 40,406 41,214 6040 FLEX PLAN 58,851 58,068 58,068 67,200 67,200 68,544 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,843 1,865 1,865 2,006 2,356 2,403 651,457 631,813 631,813 673,269 676,455 701,984 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 100 - 14,000 14,000 14,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 4,925 6,397 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 7,618 8,760 12,800 12,800 12,800 12,800 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 389 541 700 700 700 700 6107 MILEAGE 3,780 542 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6160 DATA PROCESS ING -LOGIS 70,071 71,830 73,400 73,400 74,741 74,741 6188 TELEPHONE 612 611 700 700 700 700 87,395 88,781 98,100 112,100 113,441 113,441 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 637 1,309 1,309 2,200 2,200 2,200 6575 PRINTING - - - 700 700 700 637 1,309 1,309 2,900 2,900 2,900 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 39,174 39,871 40,728 40,728 41,292 41,652 6804 CITY HALL 16,718 16,062 18,720 18,720 19,128 19,596 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 4,396 5,608 5,472 5,472 5,196 5,304 60,288 61,541 64,920 64,920 65,616 66,552 TOTAL ASSESSING $ 799,777 $ 783,444 $ 796,142 $ 853,189 $ 858,412 $ 884,877 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-48 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: LEGAL & PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT COURT SERVICES 1195 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Legal and Court Services -1195: The City requires the professional services of attorneys who are contracted for on an annual basis. They provide legal counsel and prepare the necessary ordinances and resolutions required to implement the wishes of the City Council. The Prosecuting Attorney defends the City in claims and suits and prosecutes all cases arising out of violation of City ordinances. Total Legal & Court Services Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 388,000 $ 388,500 0.13% $ 388,500 0.00% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 49 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT I LEGAL & COURT SERVICES 1195 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROSECUTING $ 198,950 $ 197,944 $ 224,000 $ 224,000 $ 224,000 $ 224,000 6131 CIVIL 93,068 102,725 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 6170 HENNEPIN COUNTY BOOKING CHARGE 19,651 13,460 16,500 16,500 17,000 17,000 6225 ROOM & BOARD PRISONERS 28,075 33,289 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 TOTAL LEGAL & COURT SERVICES $ 339,744 $ 347,418 $ 388,000 $ 388,000 $ 388,500 $ 388,500 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 50 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: COMMISSIONS & GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT SPECIAL PROJECTS 1500-1516 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Contingencies -1500: The contingencies budget provides for unbudgeted and unforeseen expenditures which may be authorized during the year. It also reduces the impact of unforeseen losses of revenue which may occur. Special Assessments on City Property - 1503: City owned properties are subject to special assessments for various improvement projects. This program provides funds to pay for these assessments. The budget also reflects the costs necessary to pay Hennepin County for mandated truth in taxation mailing. Human Rights & Relations Commission - 1504: The Human Rights & Relations Commission has 9 regular and 2 student members and is an advisory body to the City Council in the areas of human rights, human needs and human relationships. The Commission meets monthly. Starting with budget year 2012, a newly- created Human Services Task Force assumed the duties of HRRC for the annual proposal of a human services budget for approval by the City Council. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 51 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: COMMISSIONS PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT I & SPECIAL PROJECTS 1500-1516 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED CONTINGENCIES - 1500 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 37,872 $ 93,230 $ 85,000 $ 265,000 $ 376,556 $ 423,000 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,680 816 1,200 2,000 2,000 2,000 TOTAL CONTINGENCIES $ 39,552 $ 94,046 $ 86,200 $ 267,000 $ 378,556 $ 425,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS -1503 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: 6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 28,740 $ 54,851 $ 48,000 $ 32,000 $ 36,000 $ 37,000 TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 28,740 $ 54,851 $ 48,000 $ 32,000 $ 36,000 $ 37,000 HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION -1504 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 87,375 $ 79,124 $ 79,684 $ 79,684 $ 81,278 $ 82,903 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION - - 250 250 - - 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 247 - 200 200 200 200 6136 CHEMICAL HEALTH - - 500 500 - - 6218 EDUCATION PROGRAM 490 671 2,298 2,298 3,050 3,050 88,112 79,795 82,932 82,932 84,528 86,153 TOTAL HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION $ 88,112 $ 79,795 $ 82,932 $ 82,932 $ 84,528 $ 86,153 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-52 FUND: COMMISSIONS & GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Suburban Rate Authority -1506: PROGRAM: 1500-1516 The Suburban Rate Authority is a joint powers organization that actively intervenes in matters affecting gas, electric, and telephone rates. The Suburban Rate Authority has also been active in matters concerning uniform gas and electric franchises, gas, electric and telephone rate regulation, right -of -way issues, and in legislation concerning the Public Utilities Commission. Edina Resource Center - 1507: In 2002, the City elected to withdraw from the Hennepin South Services Collaborative (HSSC) and establish a freestanding family services resource center. This resource center, named Edina Resource Center, is operated as part of the family services collaborative administered by the Edina Public Schools. This budget item constitutes the City's contribution to the operation of the Edina Resource Center. Records Management Program - 1511: This includes doing an inventory and setting up a database in order to meet state data practice laws. Employee Programs - 1513: Employee Programs is made up of three expense items; Separation Benefits, which covers vacation and sick leave payouts for employees leaving the City, Employee Recognition, which covers various programs to honor dedicated employees, and Clothing Allowance, an allotment given to City Hall employees to purchase clothing with the City logo. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 53 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: COMMISSIONS PROGRAM: GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT I & SPECIAL PROJECTS 1500-1516 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY - 1506 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 TOTAL SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 EDINA RESOURCE CENTER -1507 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 37,200 $ 37,200 $ 38,316 $ 38,316 $ 39,082 $ 39,863 TOTAL EDINA RESOURCE CENTER $ 37,200 $ 37,200 $ 38,316 $ 38,316 $ 39,082 $ 39,863 RECORDS MANAGEMENT - 1511 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ - $ - $ - $ 8,600 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 TOTAL RECORDS MANAGEMENT $ - $ - $ - $ 8,600 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS -1513 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6035 SEPARATION BENEFITS $ 213,379 $ 391,111 $ 250,000 $ 135,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - 2,121 6,000 8,400 8,400 8,400 6203 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 2,264 2,300 2,300 2,600 3,000 3,000 6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1,354 461 1,200 4,000 4,500 4,500 3,618 4,882 9,500 15,000 15,900 15,900 TOTAL EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS $ 216,997 $ 395,993 $ 259,500 $ 150,000 $ 215,900 $ 215,900 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-54 FUND: AREA: PROGRAM: COMMISSIONS & GENERAL I GENERAL GOVERNMENT I SPECIAL PROJECTS 1 1500-1516 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Dial -a -Ride Program - 1514: The Edina Dial -a -Ride program provides a low cost transit alternative to Edina residents, principally senior citizens, who require transportation to the Senior Center, medical appointments, shopping and so forth. The program began in February 2001 and provides approximately 4,200 passeger rides annually. Hennepin County took the program over in 2010 so the City is no longer involved. Public Art - 1515: Funding for the Public Arts program was originally described as a one -time appropriation in the 2005 budget and was discontinued for the 2006 through 2010 budget years. Public Arts funding was reinstated for the 2011 budget. Historical Society -1516: Beginning in 2008, the City will provide a stipend to the Historical Society to support their staffing and programs. Total Commissions & Special Projects 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 597,848 $ 798,066 33.49% $ 847,916 6.25% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 55 FUND: GENERAL FUNCTION: GENERAL GOVERNMENT AREA: COMMISSIONS I & SPECIAL PROJECTS PROGRAM: 1500-1516 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ACCT. DESCRIPTION 2009 ACTUAL 2010 ACTUAL 2011 2012 BUDGETED 2013 BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED DIAL A RIDE - 1514 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOTAL DIAL A RIDE PUBLIC ART - 1515 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOTAL PUBLIC ART HISTORICAL SOCIETY - 1516 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOTAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY TOTAL COMMISSIONS & SPECIAL PROJECTS $ 56,899 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 56,899 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 481,500 $ 670,885 $ 533,948 $ 597,848 $ 798,066 $ 847,916 This page left blank intentionally. k Public Works This page left blank intentionally. Public Works Expenditure Summary Public Works Expenditures by Function 0 2011 ■ 2012 0 2013 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 I 1,000,000 g-- Administration Engineering Street Maintenance Public Works Expenditures by Type 0 2011 ® 2012 0 2013 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 ' Ii-- . 's Personal Services Contractual Services Commodities Central Services -59- CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 60 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 1240 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Public Works Administration -1240: Personal services consist of 1.5 employees in this area. This department provides supervision and policy guidance over various Public Works departments. These departments are Engineering, Streets, Utilities, and Equipment Operation. The total permanent employment in the Public Works area is 67.5, including the function of the City Engineer provided under Public Works Administration. Additionally, operating City liaison to other agencies such as MNDOT, Met Council, Hennepin County, PCA, Minnesota Board of Health, Corps of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts and other Cities is provided for through this account. Total Public Works Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 6,226,108 $ 6,490,886 4.25% $ '6,611,664 1.86% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-61 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I ADMINISTRATION 1240 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 139,959 $ 137,329 $ 135,200 $ 159,112 $ 164,987 $ 168,287 6030 PENSIONS 9,323 9,518 9,800 11,536 11,962 12,201 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 10,612 9,681 9,400 11,088 11,344 11,571 6040 FLEX PLAN 9,307 10,067 12,200 14,400 14,400 14,688 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 496 558 500 606 743 758 169,697 167,153 167,100 196,742 203,436 207,505 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 2,396 1,913 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,200 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 60 996 500 500 600 700 6107 MILEAGE 3,380 2,847 3,300 3,300 3,100 2,900 6188 CELL PHONE 213 223 - - - - 6,049 5,979 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 153 500 500 550 - CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 13,571 12,575 22,836 22,836 23,604 23,808 6804 CITY HALL 6,580 6,330 - - - - 6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING - - 2,076 2,076 2,076 2,100 20,151 18,905 24,912 24,912 25,680 25,908 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $ 195,897 $ 192,190 $ 199,312 $ 228,954 $ 236,466 $ 240,213 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-62 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING 1260 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Engineering -1260: Personal services consist of 10.5 employees in this area. The Engineering Department prepares plans, specifications and estimates for public construction projects. This includes street grading and surfacing, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, watermains and other structures and improvements. It supervises the construction of these projects and provides the necessary inspection to insure materials and workmanship are in accordance with project specifications. The department maintains records and files on all of the above mentioned activities and operates and maintains plan reproduction equipment. Transportation Commission - 1265: The Edina Transportation Commission is established to help guide the City in implementing its vision for an integrated, multi -modal local transportation system as stated in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The system will provide safe and efficient transportation options for all users (motorists, transit riders, bicyclists, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities) in a way that promotes the economic, environmental, social, and personal vitality of the City and its residents. The Edina Transportation Commission shall advise the City Council on the operation of the local transportation system (all modes, users, and abilities), develop strategies, plans and recommendations to implement the City's multi -modal transportation vision, review neighborhood street capital investment projects for adherence to adopted City policies and planning documents, review and comment on large development proposals, such as those requiring an Alternative Urban Areawide Review, Environmental Assessment, or Small Area Plan, discuss regional transportation improvements by outside agencies that may affect the local transportation system, promote the City's transportation vision through education and open forums, review and comment on citizen transportation concerns, traffic complaint reports, and data, review and recommend transportation - related funding, advise the City Council on additional matters when directed by the City Council. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 63 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I ENGINEERING 1260-1265 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED ENGINEERING - 1260 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 650,908 $ 650,681 $ 672,205 $ 672,205 $ 764,769 $ 780,064 6011 OVERTIME 9,533 7,044 3,232 3,232 3,297 3,363 6030 PENSIONS 43,391 44,922 48,969 48,969 55,685 56,799 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 47,179 47,176 51,671 51,671 58,759 59,934 6040 FLEX PLAN 71,784 75,273 81,600 81,600 91,200 93,024 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,797 2,786 2,878 2,878 3,937 4,016 825,592 827,882 860,555 860,555 977,647 997,200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 73,853 34,182 36,250 36,250 36,250 36,250 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 3,806 3,748 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,221 335 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 179 369 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6107 MILEAGE 8,470 2,365 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6188 CELL PHONE 7,408 7,175 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 94,937 48,174 58,250 58,250 58,250 58,250 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9,206 5,975 14,000 14,000 13,200 15,200 6548 BLUEPRINTING /CAD 26 69 300 300 100 100 6577 LUMBER & TOOLS 798 1,490 800 800 1,500 1,500 10,030 7,534 15,100 15,100 14,800 16,800 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 61,908 62,290 66,960 66,960 64,476 65,028 6804 CITY HALL 19,739 18,968 - - - - 6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING - - 13,896 13,896 13,896 14,064 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 19,933 22,984 19,884 19,884 49,104 50,184 101,580 104,242 100,740 100,740 127,476 129,276 TOTAL ENGINEERING $ 1,032,139 $ 987,832 $ 1,034,645 $ 1,034,645 $ 1,178,173 $ 1,201,526 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - 1265 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 12,417 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,129 - 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION $ 1,129 $ 12,417 $ 17,600 $ 17,600 $ 17,600 $ 17,600 TOTAL ENGINEERING $ 1,033,268 $ 1,000,249 $ 1,052,245 $ 1,052,245 $ 1,195,773 $ 1,219,126 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-64 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I SUPERVISION 1280 -1281 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Supervision -1280: Personal services consist of 2.3 employees in this area. The operations of the Public Works department are overseen by the Public Works Coordinator. Some of the activities include: 1. Maintaining a computerized vehicle management system to determine the expense of vehicle maintenance; 2. the purchasing and billing of equipment and supplies; and 3. maintaining an up -to -date inventory of the commodities used to service the City. Additionally, the Coordinator plans and coordinates Public Works activities, maintains cost and work records and provides the training and instruction necessary to insure the workers do their jobs most efficiently and effectively. Overhead - a major portion of this budget is the general benefits for the street department allocated from the Central Services budget. Training -1281: This program provides for the personal services time and aids required to provide the necessary training. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-65 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I SUPERVISION 1280-1281 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED SUPERVISION - 1280 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 130,500 $ 61,944 $ 127,100 $ 149,543 $ 153,297 $ 156,363 6011 OVERTIME 1,044 265 3,900 4,646 4,739 4,834 6030 PENSIONS 8,876 4,327 9,500 11,179 11,458 11,687 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 9,573 4,857 10,000 11,795 12,090 12,332 6040 FLEX PLAN 16,765 10,754 18,800 22,080 22,080 22,522 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 409 135 400 469 560 571 167,167 82,282 169,700 199,712 204,224 208,309 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 2,762 3,022 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,899 762 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 6188 CELL PHONE - 248 100 100 100 100 6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL 562 1,500 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 6,223 5,532 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,361 4 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 95,835 98,081 101,268 101,268 93,744 94,548 6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 44,344 56,010 166,620 166,620 166,704 168,756 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 21,340 25,518 23,532 23,532 24,300 24,828 161 ,519 179,609 291,420 291,420 284,748 288,132 TOTAL SUPERVISION $ 337,270 $ 267,427 $ 470,820 $ 500,832 $ 498,672 $ 506,141 TRAINING - 1281 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ - $ 825 $ - $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS - 229 - - - - - 1,054 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 23,982 9,494 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 COMMODITIES: 6579 TRAINING AIDS 547 - 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,300 TOTAL TRAINING $ 24,529 $ 10,548 $ 27,100 $ 27,100 $ 27,200 $ 27,300 TOTAL SUPERVISION & TRAINING $ 361,799 $ 277,975 $ 497,920 $ 527,932 $ 525,872 $ 533,441 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 66 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PUBLIC WORKS I STREET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Street Department Payroll Summary - Distribution The Street Department consists of 28 personnel which include the following positions: 1 Facility Manager 3 Team Leaders 24 Street Maintenance Personnel Additionally, 8 summer employees are hired to assist in various projects. Street Maintenance $ 2,176,533 Charged to other funds: Central Services: City Hall 36,316 Public Works Building 54,817 Equipment 6,854 Fire Buildings 7,538 Park Buildings 34,187 Enterprise Funds 156,509 Total Street payroll $ 2,472,754 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 67 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PUBLIC WORKS I STREET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES This page is intentionally left blank. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-68 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I STREET MAINTENANCE 1301 -1310 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES General Maintenance -1301: These funds are allocated for the general repairs made to the street; rubberized crack sealing, asphalt patching, minor seal coating, and miscellaneous repairs. Crews totaling approximately five "people years" work on general maintenance of City streets year- round, weather permitting. Street Sweeping -1310: These funds are allocated for cleaning the 200 miles (800 lane miles) of City streets and 45 parking lots. Sweeping usually begins in early March, attempting to rid the streets and lots of winter sand to prevent being washed into storm sewers. Six people are involved in the sweeping effort from early spring into summer and begin again in the fall when leaves are swept up to prevent the clogging of catch basins. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE- 69 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I STREET MAINTENANCE 1301-1310 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED GENERAL MAINTENANCE - 1301 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 602,028 $ 568,778 $ 1,317,600 $ 1,432,221 $ 1,528,270 $ 1,558,835 6011 OVERTIME 47,861 42,405 65,700 71,407 72,835 74,292 6030 PENSIONS 42,266 40,803 100,300 109,011 116,087 118,409 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 46,736 43,102 105,800 115,025 122,481 124,931 6040 FLEX PLAN 83,388 79,006 207,900 226,024 236,759 241,494 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 48,561 48,592 109,400 118,927 100,101 102,103 870,840 822,686 1,906,700 2,072,615 2,176,533 2,220,064 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SVCS 1,364 1,250 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 6151 EQUIP RENTAL /CRUSHING - 11,711 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIR 24,418 4,735 21,600 21,600 21,600 21,600 6182 RUBBISH HAULING 5,876 3,472 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6188 CELL PHONE 3,502 2,737 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6201 LAUNDRY 17,952 14,754 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 53,112 38,659 61,200 61,200 61,200 61,200 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9,098 34,242 18,000 18,000 18,100 18,300 6517 SELECT MATERIALS 375 2,068 500 500 600 700 6518 ASPHALT MIX 26,541 25,945 26,000 26,000 26,000 15,000 6519 MC 1 OIL /RUB CRACK FILL 34,238 20,808 35,000 35,000 35,000 45,000 6520 CONCRETE - 215 100 100 100 12,000 6556 TOOLS 14,893 29,286 16,000 16,000 17,000 10,000 6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5,820 4,686 7,500 7,500 7,300 6,000 90,965 117,250 103,100 103,100 104,100 107,000 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 584,638 676,145 622,512 622,512 623,892 637,620 TOTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE $ 1,599,555 $ 1,654,740 $ 2,693,512 $ 2,859,427 $ 2,965,725 $ 3,025,884 STREET SWEEPING -1310 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 97,086 $ 82,826 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 1,154 227 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 6,631 5,814 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 7,076 5,844 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 13,296 10,588 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 8,842 7,556 - - - - 134,085 112,855 - - - - COMMODITIES: 6523 BROOMS 13,700 19,502 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,300 6524 WEARING SHOES - - 250 250 300 400 13,700 19,502 13,250 13,250 13,300 13,700 TOTAL STREET SWEEPING $ 147,785 $ 132,357 $ 13,250 $ 13,250 $ 13,300 $ 13,700 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-70 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I STREET MAINTENANCE 1314 -1318 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Street Renovation -1314: This program incorporates approximately 15 to 20 miles of street renovation annually. This work includes surface leveling and seal coating asphalt streets. This also includes some milling of asphalt streets, overlaying with a new lift of asphalt, and recycling street in place with an asphalt overlay. As to concrete streets, this account funds concrete repairs that are not a result of watermain and utility repairs. The concrete repair includes concrete surface repairs, curb and gutter adjustments, and concrete panel replacement. This work area involves approximately twenty employees (full and part-time) from May (when road restrictions are lifted) to late September. Snow and Ice Removal -1318: Snow and ice removal in Edina constitutes a majority of the Street Department's work during the winter months. The City, which consists of 200 miles of street, 47 miles of sidewalk, 5 miles of alley, 273 cul -de- sacs, 45 parking lots, and 3 parking ramps is divided in 26 snow plow routes. The equipment involved in plowing includes 23 trucks with plows, 1 grader, 5 loaders, and 3 sidewalk plows. 23 units are equipped with wings for more efficient plowing and some are equipped with pre - wetting equipment. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 71 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I STREET MAINTENANCE 1314-1318 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED RENOVATION - 1314 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 174,710 $ 167,592 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 8,099 344 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 12,019 10,799 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 13,096 11,850 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 23,800 21,711 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 16,844 14,995 - - - - 248,568 227,291 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIR 5,487 21,009 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7,500 5,926 11,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 6517 GRANULAR MATERIALS 30,745 44,326 37,000 37,000 37,000 38,000 6518 ASPHALT MIX 407,652 395,237 375,000 375,000 378,800 389,200 6519 EMUL. ASPHALT 50,751 20,028 51,000 51,000 51,000 52,000 6520 CONCRETE 7,030 9,408 14,000 14,000 14,000 15,500 503,678 474,925 488,000 488,000 492,800 507,700 TOTAL RENOVATION $ 757,733 $ 723,225 $ 512,000 $ 512,000 $ 516,800 $ 531,700 SNOW & ICE REMOVAL -1318 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 147,913 $ 202,645 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 73,568 119,726 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 14,945 22,702 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 15,937 23,386 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 31,551 38,684 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 15,689 24,476 - - - - 299,603 431,619 - - - - COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,666 7,604 15,300 15,300 15,300 15,300 6516 CALCIUM CHLOR. /DEICER 2,219 - 2,500 2,500 2,500 4,000 6517 SAND 721 1,100 3,500 3,500 1,100 1,500 6525 SALT 166,508 275,081 189,000 189,000 193,400 197,900 172,114 283,785 210,300 210,300 212,300 218,700 TOTAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL $ 471,717 $ 715,404 $ 210,300 $ 210,300 $ 212,300 $ 218,700 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE $ 2,976,790 $ 3,225,726 $ 3,429,062 $ 3,594,977 $ 3,708,125 $ 3,789,984 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 72 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I STREET LIGHTING 1321 -1322 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Regular Street Lighting - 1321: There are 1,787 Xcel -owned street lights in the City. Most 'over the roadway" lights are attached to existing Xcel service poles. The funds in this program are used for rental fees, power and replacement of existing systems. Ornamental Street Lighting - 1322: The City owns 535 ornamental street lights. Ornamental lights include decorative or architectural lighting that has a unique design head and pole, or in some cases, antique lighting. The City is responsible for all parts and maintenance of the lights including underground wiring and painting of the poles. The funds in this program are expended on power parts, replacement fixtures, poles and lamps. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 73 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I STREET LIGHTING 1321 -1322 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED REGULAR -1321 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 392 $ 921 $ - $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS 166 251 - - - - 558 1,172 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,250 - 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6185 LIGHT & POWER 396,188 376,487 390,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 397,438 376,487 393,000 393,000 393,000 393,000 COMMODITIES: 6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,139 - 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,100 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR $ 399,135 $ 377,659 $ 401,000 $ 401,000 $ 401,000 $ 401,100 ORNAMENTAL - 1322 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 58,189 $ 53,139 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6030 PENSIONS 3,848 3,693 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 4,399 4,094 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 6,824 6,505 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,202 1,799 - - - - 75,462 69,230 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 11,301 6,981 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 6185 LIGHT & POWER 16,827 17,929 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 6188 CELL PHONE 2,310 2,097 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 6189 LAUNDRY - - - - - - 30,438 27,007 39,900 39,900 39,900 39,900 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,297 6,089 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 6530 REPAIR PARTS 13,907 15,440 17,000 17,000 17,200 17,900 20,204 21,529 24,000 24,000 24,200 24,900 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL $ 126,104 $ 117,766 $ 63,900 $ 63,900 $ 64,100 $ 64,800 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING $ 525,239 $ 495,425 $ 464,900 $ 464,900 $ 465,100 $ 465,900 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 74 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I TRAFFIC /STREET SIGNS 1325 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Street Name Signs /Traffic Signs -1325: The funds for this program are used for the maintenance and replacement of the City's 3,200 street name signs. These signs usually last 6 -7 years, however, most are replaced earlier due to damages or vandalism at a rate of roughly 10% per year. The traffic sign account covers the maintenance and replacement of approximately 6,700 traffic signs. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 75 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: TRAFFIC PROGRAM: _ GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I & STREET NAME SIGNS 1325 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 51,706 $ 44,381 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6030 PENSIONS 3,483 3,161 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 3,623 3,242 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 7,663 7,079 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 4,441 4,182 - - - - 70,916 62,045 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 175 - 500 500 500 500 6188 CELL PHONE - - - - - - 175 - 500 500 500 500 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,745 5,430 14,000 14,000 6,000 6,000 6531 SIGNS & POSTS 44,486 27,297 44,500 44,500 49,100 49,900 6532 PAINT 2,459 5,408 500 500 500 500 53,690 38,135 59,000 59,000 55,600 56,400 TOTAL STREET NAME SIGNS $ 124,781 $ 100,180 $ 59,500 $ 59,500 $ 56,100 $ 56,900 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-76 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 1330 -1335 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Traffic Signal Maintenance -1330: The City owns and maintains 14 traffic signal systems, and assists with maintenance of an additional 13 systems, in conjunction with the State. Electronic maintenance is performed down to a component level on all printed circuit boards. 90% of the funds from this account are applied toward light and power with the remaining 10% directed towards parts, back -up equipment and test equipment. Pavement Marking -1335: The City sign shop, which is responsible for pavement marking, consists of 2 employees, 1 truck, 2 stripers, and 1 trailer. The bulk of the funds for this account are directed towards the following projects: Proiects • Center line striping of State Aid streets • Lane striping • Painting legends & arrows on pavement and parking lots; and 70 school crossings Material Used 450 gallons paint 250 gallons paint 100 gallons paint The sign shop is also responsible for striping the City's 45 parking lots and painting the center line and messages on Cornelia and Bredeson Park walking paths. The "6532 Paint & Pavement Marking" line item also now includes permanent pavement marking materials. We have found that some high traffic areas and concrete streets do not hold paint very well. We have changed to different materials which last longer. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-77 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I TRAFFIC CONTROL 1330-1335 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 1330 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 19,279 $ 15,539 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6030 PENSIONS 1,142 1,078 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 1,491 1,211 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 1,376 1,188 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 695 559 - - - - 23,983 19,575 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5,973 11,854 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6185 LIGHT & POWER 61,073 58,828 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 6215 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 25,925 17,706 25,600 25,600 25,600 25,600 92,971 88,388 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 922 82 600 600 600 600 6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,894 970 8,000 8,000 7,500 7,500 4,816 1,052 8,600 8,600 8,100 8,100 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE $ 121,770 $ 109,015 $ 105,200 $ 105,200 $ 104,700 $ 104,700 PAVEMENT MARKING - 1335 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 20,558 $ 22,711 $ - $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS 7,729 9,231 - - - - 28,287 31,942 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 300 300 300 300 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,149 - 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 6531 SIGNS & POSTS - - 2,800 2,800 2,900 3,100 6532 PAINT & PAVE MARKING 5,648 5,972 22,500 22,500 28,400 29,300 6,797 5,972 28,100 28,100 34,100 35,200 TOTAL PAVEMENT MARKING $ 35,084 $ 37,914 $ 28,400 $ 28,400 $ 34,400 $ 35,500 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONTROL $ 156,854 $ 146,929 $ 133,600 $ 133,600 $ 139,100 $ 140,200 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 78 FUND: GENERAL I FUNCPUBL.IC WORKS I ABRIDGES/GUARD RAILS (PROGRAM: 1343 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Bridges /Guard Rails -1343: The sign shop is responsible for the sanding, priming, and painting of bridge rails and guide posts. There are 25 bridges and culverts in the City which require annual inspection and certification to the state as to their condition. Major deck repairs are taken care of by outside contractors. Additionally, there are numerous guard rail locations throughout the City that require periodic maintenance. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 79 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I BRIDGES /GUARD RAILS 1343 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 21,496 $ 12,370 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6030 PENSIONS 1,451 866 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 1,441 854 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 3,202 1,676 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,874 1,115 - - - - 29,464 16,881 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,000 706 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - - 300 300 300 300 4,000 706 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,772 1,973 2,900 2,900 2,900 3,000 6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL 4,324 507 5,000 5,000 5,050 5,200 8,096 2,480 7,900 7,900 7,950 8,200 TOTAL BRIDGES /GUARD RAILS $ 41,560 $ 20,067 $ 10,500 $ 10,500 $ 10,550 $ 10,800 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-80 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I RETAINING WALL MAINT. 1344 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Retaining Wall Maintenance -1344: There are approximately 50 retaining walls in the City. They are beginning to show age for various reasons and are in need of repair. They are constructed of timber, lannon stone and other landscaping materials. This program provides for materials, some contracted repairs, and labor distributed from the general street maintenance program. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-81 FUND: GENERAL FUNCTION: PUBLIC WORKS AREA: I RETAINING WALLS PROGRAM: 1344 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ACCT. DESCRIPTION 2009 ACTUAL 2010 ACTUAL 2011 2012 BUDGETED 2013 BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL BENEFITS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6577 LUMBER /STONE TOTAL RETAINING WALLS $ 602 224 $ 404 312 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - - 826 716 - - - - 3,096 - 24,900 24,900 24,900 24,900 410 10,439 57 4,074 400 8,000 400 8,000 400 8,000 400 8,300 10,849 4,131 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,700 $ 14,771 $ 4,847 $ 33,300 $ 33,300 $ 33,300 $ 33,600 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-82 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: SIDEWALKS PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I RAMPS, PARKING LOTS 1 1365 -1370 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Sidewalks - Maintenance and Repair -1365 Maintenance and repairs for the City's 47 miles of sidewalk begin in the early spring with the sweeping of winter sand and proceed through the summer and fall with maintenance on an "as- needed" basis by the City street crews. Sidewalks - Snow and Ice Removal - 1370: Another responsibility of the Street department is the removal of snow from the City's 47 miles of sidewalk. Three snow plow /blowers are used to accomplished this task. Under normal conditions, it takes 2 -4 days to clear walks. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 83 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: SIDEWALKS PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS RAMPS, PARKING LOTS 1365-1370 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED SIDEWALKS - MAINTENANCE & REPAIR - 1365 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 8,478 $ 5,621 $ - $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS 3,190 2,177 - - - - 11,668 7,798 - - - - COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 117 500 500 500 600 6518 BLACKTOP - - 500 500 500 500 6520 CONCRETE 1,003 2,591 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,003 2,708 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,100 TOTAL SIDEWALK - MAINTENANCE & REPAIR $ 12,671 $ 10,506 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,100 SIDEWALKS - SNOW & ICE REMOVAL - 1370 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 26,213 $ 24,365 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 8,263 9,130 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 2,326 2,357 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 2,566 2,503 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 4,831 3,850 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,564 2,753 - - - - 46,763 44,958 - - - - COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - - 500 500 500 500 TOTAL SIDEWALK - SNOW & ICE REMOVAL $ 46,763 $ 44,958 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 84 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: SIDEWALKS PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I RAMPS, PARKING LOTS 1375 -1380 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Parking Ramp Maintenance - 1375: The City owns 3 parking ramps in downtown Edina. Each ramp consists of 3 levels, with 302 spaces in the south ramp, 274 spaces in the center ramp and 269 in the north ramp. The funds from this account are allocated towards plowing, sweeping, lighting, cleaning supplies, and contractual services. $69,000 is received in revenue from the 50th & France Business Association to pay for their share of ramp maintenance. Parking Lot Maintenance - 1380: Funds for this program are directed toward maintaining the City's parking lots. Maintenance includes sweeping, plowing and striping of the lots and is done by the street department. The parking lots covered in this account includes parking lots at the following locations: Public Works, City Hall, 50th & France Middle Surface lot, east row of the Lund's surface lot at 50th & France, and the entrance lot of the Jerry's parking ramp at Grandview. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-85 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: SIDEWALKS PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS I RAMPS, PARKING LOTS 1375-1380 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PARKING RAMP MAINT. - 1375 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 6,938 $ 9,853 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 6,349 7,367 - - - - BENEFITS 4,549 5,411 - - - - 17,836 22,631 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,642 19,435 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 6185 LIGHT & POWER 60,511 62,377 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 6189 SEWER & WATER 299 331 300 300 300 300 82,452 82,143 82,300 82,300 82,300 82,300 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,874 2,797 4,800 4,800 4,900 5,200 6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES - - 300 300 300 300 6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,709 1,072 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 6,583 3,869 13,600 13,600 13,700 14,000 TOTAL PARKING RAMP MAINTENANCE $ 106,871 $ 108,643 $ 95,900 $ 95,900 $ 96,000 $ 96,300 PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE - 1380 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS - - - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 500 500 500 500 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 500 500 500 500 6518 BLACKTOP - 5,200 14,800 14,800 15,000 15,600 6519 SURFACE TREATMENT - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 5,200 20,300 20,300 20,500 21,100 TOTAL PARKING LOTS $ - $ 5,200 $ 20,800 $ 20,800 $ 21,000 $ 21,600 TOTAL SIDEWALKS - RAMPS & PARKING LOTS $ 166,305 $ 169,307 $ 120,200 $ 120,200 $ 120,500 $ 121,500 This page left blank intentionally. Public Safety This page left blank intentionally. Public Safety Expenditure Summary Public Safety Expenditures by Function El 2011 ® 2012 12013 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 i E I 3,000,000— 2,000,000 — 1,000,000 Police Protection Animal Control Fire Protection Public Health Inspections Public Safety Expenditures by Type 2011 ® 2012 0 2013 14,000,000 12,000,000 ! 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 f 2,000,000 i Personal Services Contractual Services Commodities Central Services :• CITY OF EDINA ANNUALBUDGET PAGE - 90 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I POLICE PROTECTION 1400 -1419 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Police -1400: Personal services consists of 68 full -time employees (including 1 position originally frozen in 2010), part- time help, and community service officers. The City of Edina Police Department is called upon to perform many emergency and public service tasks throughout the year. In 2010, the department responded to over 28,000 calls for service which involved medical emergencies, fires, accidents, thefts, damage to property, suspicious persons and vehicles, alarm responses as well as public service and educational activities. Approximately 40% of these calls require multiple officer responses, which equals over 39,000 officer responses. The City reported 981 major Part I crimes such as burglary, robbery, assault, and theft, with an additional 1,071 Part II or lesser crimes in 2010. This was a 6% decrease compared to 2009. Police respond to emergency calls within 5 minutes and to non - emergency calls within 10 minutes under normal conditions. The Edina Police Department operates a 24 -hour Communications Center which handles all 911 calls and dispatches the appropriate Police, Fire, and EMS units. The Police Department is also responsible for educating the public in crime prevention techniques, investigation of all felony crimes against persons and, where warranted, other crimes as well. The Edina Police Department has full -time officers assigned to the Southwest Hennepin County Narcotics Task Force and the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. The Police Department also works to prepare the community for disasters or emergencies - natural or man- made. This is accomplished by compliance with Federal, State and County guidelines for emergency preparedness planning. This area has become increasingly important with Homeland Security concerns and the threat of Pandemic Flu. Action plans are developed and practiced at the City level. This activity, coupled with 10 outdoor warning sirens, ensures the operation of government and maintenance of emergency services during disasters. The City maintains an Emergency Operations Plan, which follows an all- hazards approach to preparing for and responding to large scale emergencies. 80% of the Police budget is directly or indirectly spent on labor. The Police Department operates 7 days a week, 24 hours per day and maintains an average patrol strength of 5.2 officers at any given time. Explanation of Change: • One sworn investigative position has been frozen for 2012. • Two full -time positions were added to the Central Communication division to accommodate additional staffing needs as the department is now dispatching police and fire calls for the City of Golden Valley. • The part-time Crime Prevention Coordinator position was converted to full -time in 2012. • The Civilian Defense area has been combined into the regular Police Protection budget. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-91 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I POLICE PROTECTION 1400-1419 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ACCT. DESCRIPTION 2009 ACTUAL 2010 ACTUAL 2011 2012 BUDGETED 2013 BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED POLICE SERVICES -1400 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 4,743,228 $ 5,006,611 $ 4,808,284 $ 4,808,284 $ 5,239,674 $ 5,448,649 6011 OVERTIME 184,602 159,982 170,319 148,319 151,285 154,311 6030 PENSIONS 621,683 643,012 643,753 643,753 701,049 729,009 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 127,858 133,398 129,775 125,775 144,060 149,806 6037 FITNESS 18,065 18,037 18,803 23,803 24,279 24,765 6040 FLEX PLAN 520,117 541,232 555,800 616,800 643,200 656,064 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 113,122 134,684 133,286 103,286 95,561 99,372 6,328,675 6,636,956 6,460,020 6,470,020 6,999,108 7,261,976 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,984 20,331 19,849 19,849 19,849 19,849 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 42,177 46,646 58,452 58,452 58,452 58,452 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,850 4,516 5,959 2,959 2,959 2,959 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 1,162 1,788 1,077 1,077 1,077 1,077 6107 MILEAGE 555 500 1,184 1,184 1,184 1,184 6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 30,036 25,923 24,202 24,202 24,202 24,202 6160 DATA PROCESSING 23,570 24,136 58,102 69,102 69,102 69,102 6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 1,122 1,492 1,399 1,399 1,399 1,399 6185 LIGHT AND POWER 732 686 846 846 846 846 6188 TELEPHONE 21,813 20,025 22,313 14,313 14,313 14,313 6201 LAUNDRY 184 448 539 539 539 539 6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 36,701 42,299 48,154 48,154 48,154 48,154 6204 TELETYPE SERVICE 1,980 1,920 3,661 3,661 3,661 3,661 6215 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 22,357 17,668 13,944 13,944 13,944 13,944 6221 RANGE RENTAL 20,324 21,941 23,021 23,021 23,021 23,021 6230 SERVICE CONTR. - EQUIP. 129,432 137,636 109,438 109,438 109,438 109,438 6235 POSTAGE 3,865 4,595 5,447 5,447 5,447 5,447 349,844 372,550 397,587 397,587 397,587 397,587 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 594 1,379 1,082 1,082 1,093 1,126 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 35,488 28,765 47,501 36,001 36,361 37,452 6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 401 102 582 1,082 1,093 1,126 6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 574 259 448 1,948 1,967 2,027 6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8,123 7,406 5,711 5,711 5,768 5,941 6514 INSPECTION EXPENSES - - 190 1,190 1,202 1,238 6551 AMMUNITION 13,939 13,983 13,756 13,756 13,894 14,310 6575 PRINTING 5,528 5,919 6,903 11,903 12,022 12,383 6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1,107 1,284 174 3,674 3,711 3,822 65,754 59,097 76,347 76,347 77,111 79,425 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 92 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I POLICE PROTECTION 1400 -1419 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Reserve Program -1419: The reserve program is comprised of the Senior Police Reserve (1 member), Explorer Post 925 (20 members), and the Edina Police Reserve (19 volunteer members). Explorer Post 925 contributes approximately 800 hours of public services to various community events and programs. This is a result of career orientation and training provided by the Police Department. The Edina Police Reserve serves the community in excess of 2,500 hours annually. They perform work during special events and provide non - emergency service work and patrol. Total Police Budget 2011 2012 $ 7,981,304 $ 8,507,088 2013 % 6.59% $ 8,790,126 3.33% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-93 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I POLICE PROTECTION 1400-1419 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL $ 207,361 $ 206,308 $ 375,444 $ 375,444 $ 377,580 $ 380,832 6804 CITY HALL 210,032 201,834 235,164 235,164 240,264 246,192 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 383,742 441,596 405,612 405,612 394,308 402,984 801,135 849,738 1,016,220 1,016,220 1,012,152 1,030,008 TOTAL POLICE SERVICES $ 7,545,408 $ 7,918,341 $ 7,950,174 $ 7,960,174 $ 8,485,958 $ 8,768,996 RESERVE PROGRAM -1419 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $ 6,900 $ 2,000 $ 7,752 $ 7,752 $ 7,752 $ 7,752 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 8,892 5,129 5,161 5,161 5,161 5,161 6106 MEETING EXPENSE - - 1,110 1,110 1,110 1,110 6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 2,111 3,078 5,974 5,974 5,974 5,974 17,903 10,207 19,997 19,997 1%997 19,997 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - - 1,133 1,133 1,133 1,133 TOTAL RESERVE PROGRAM $ 17,903 $ 10,207 $ 21,130 $ 21,130 $ 21,130 $ 21,130 TOTAL POLICE PROTECTION $ 7,563,311 $ 7,928,548 $ 7,971,304 $ 7,981,304 $ 8,507,088 $ 8,790,126 CITY OF EDINA ANNUALBUDGET PAGE - 94 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I ANIMAL CONTROL 1450 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Animal Control -1450: Personal services consist of 1 full -time employee. Animal control is a function of the Police Department. The Animal Control Officer is responsible for the enforcement of the City's animal - related ordinances and also assists City residents with animal control problems, both wild and domestic. Approximately 1,200 calls for service are responded to annually. Animal control is provided 16 hours per day by augmenting one Animal Control Officer with CSOs responding to calls for service. Priorities for animal control are the safety and protection of persons, the well -being of the City's animal population, and the protection of property. Total Animal Control Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 91,981 $ 93,106 1.22% $ 94,786 1.80% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 95 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I ANIMAL CONTROL 1450 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 51,282 $ 52,195 $ 51,995 $ 51,995 $ 53,061 $ 54,122 6011 OVERTIME - - 707 707 721 735 6030 PENSIONS 3,461 3,622 3,869 3,869 3,948 4,027 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 4,148 4,042 4,082 4,082 4,165 4,248 6037 FITNESS 1,300 650 657 657 670 683 6040 FLEX PLAN 9,091 9,339 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,792 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,207 1,027 923 923 925 944 70,489 70,875 71,833 71,833 73,090 74,551 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 548 885 - - - - 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION - - 510 510 510 510 6217 KENNEL SERVICES 9,278 14,286 8,082 8,082 8,082 8,082 9,826 15,171 8,592 8,592 8,592 8,592 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,050 862 2,448 2,448 2,472 2,547 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 3,669 2,972 4,968 4,968 4,764 4,812 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 3,921 4,531 4,140 4,140 4,188 4,284 7,590 7,503 9,108 9,108 8,952 9,096 TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL $ 89,955 $ 94,411 $ 91,981 $ 91,981 $ 93,106 $ 94,786 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 96 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I FIRE PROTECTION 1 1470 I SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES I Fire Protection - 1470: Personal services consist of 31 full -time firefighters, 1 full -time support employee, 1 part-time employee and 11 -15 volunteer firefighters. Services are provided in 5 primary areas; fire suppression, special operations, emergency medical services, fire prevention, and public information. The primary purpose of fire suppression and special operations is to provide an immediate response to protect lives, property and the environment from exposure to natural, industrial and environmental hazards. Response should place a fire or emergency unit on the scene within 8 minutes at least 90% of the time. Typical actions are search, rescue, and removal of persons in immediate danger, interior fire attack to stop the fire development, exterior fire streams to prevent fire extension, fire extinguishment and control. Also necessary actions and measures to minimize property damage by smoke, water, weather and release of hazardous or toxic materials. Equipment consists of 3 pumpers, 1 aerial tower, 1 Heavy Rescue and various support vehicles. In 2010, 910 fire responses included fires, rescues, hazardous conditions, and public service emergency calls. The purpose of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is to provide immediate and advanced life support actions to meet the community's emergency medical needs. Response should place an ambulance on the scene within 6 minutes at least 90% of the time. Equipment consists of 3 Advanced Life Support (ALS) paramedic ambulances and one ALS equipped pumper. Services provide both immediate emergency care and transportation to metro -area hospitals. Paramedics are cross - trained as firefighters, and all firefighters are cross - trained to emergency medical technician level. Emergency medical services also include public information activities to prevent and best prepare citizens for emergency medical situations. In 2010, medical calls totaled 3,599. The long -term trend in medical emergency calls is upward. Our citywide average response time to all emergencies is 4 minutes. The goal of fire prevention activities is three -fold: first, to prevent fire ignition whenever possible, second, when fires do occur, to minimize fire impact on lives and property, and finally information management to allow us to forecast needs in the areas of built fire protection systems, operational support and program development. Strategies for action include fire detection, automatic suppression, structural compartmentalization, building access and site controls. Prevention information emphasizes citizen survival by teaching proven fire safety techniques. All Fire Department personnel are involved in public information programs, smoke detector installation and building inspection activities. Fire inspectors typically make the specialized permit and approval inspections. Last year the fire department visited over 100 classrooms and events to promote fire prevention and personal safety. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-97 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I FIRE PROTECTION 1470 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 2,504,151 $ 2,655,441 $ 2,565,801 $ 2,565,801 $ 2,726,012 $ 2,780,532 6011 OVERTIME 347,426 267,008 259,873 259,873 265,070 270,371 6030 PENSIONS 380,293 381,772 402,422 402,422 426,141 434,664 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 41,622 43,887 44,396 44,396 48,013 48,973 6037 FITNESS 8,489 6,967 10,100 10,100 10,302 10,508 6040 FLEX PLAN 194,352 211,097 308,027 308,027 308,014 314,174 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 54,424 51,569 44,931 44,931 46,628 47,561 3,530,757 3,617,741 3,635,550 3,635,550 3,830,180 3,906,783 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 95,463 108,476 119,000 119,000 121,000 123,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 19,451 27,494 20,000 20,000 25,500 25,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,629 1,835 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6106 MEETING EXPENSE 1,313 706 800 800 800 800 6107 MILEAGE 261 433 300 300 310 320 6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 23,324 19,872 22,000 22,000 22,400 22,800 6160 DATA PROCESSING 15,523 10,019 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,500 6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION 10,754 10,990 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 33,158 56,154 37,000 37,000 38,000 39,000 6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 2,552 1,375 1,500 1,500 1,600 1,700 6185 LIGHT AND POWER 24,405 20,931 22,000 22,000 24,000 25,000 6186 HEAT 26,790 20,337 24,000 24,000 25,000 26,000 6188 TELEPHONE 12,186 10,460 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000 6189 SEWER AND WATER 3,128 3,028 2,000 2,000 10,000 10,000 6201 LAUNDRY 6,121 5,493 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 6215 PREVENTATIVE MAINT. 28,128 23,757 21,300 21,300 22,000 23,000 6221 TOWER RENTAL 14,720 16,779 17,500 17,500 18,000 18,000 6260 LICENSES AND PERMITS 548 446 300 300 500 500 319,454 338,585 334,700 334,700 359,110 366,120 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 310 285 800 800 500 500 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 57,793 54,171 50,500 50,500 52,000 54,000 6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 64 - 200 200 200 200 6510 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 69,828 67,496 67,000 67,000 68,000 69,000 6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 3,474 2,848 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,413 1,568 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6530 REPAIR PARTS 14,401 10,118 10,000 10,000 11,000 11,000 6550 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - - 500 500 200 200 6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 8,871 20,283 8,800 8,800 9,000 9,000 6556 TOOLS 112 185 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6557 FIREFIGHTING FOAM 4,516 2,056 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500 6558 FIRE UNIFORMS 24,111 21,006 19,000 19,000 20,000 20,000 6579 TRAINING AIDS 3,084 2,821 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6614 FIRE PREVENTION 2,087 1,258 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 191,064 184,095 168,800 168,800 173,400 176,400 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 98 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I FIRE PROTECTION 1470 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Explanation of Change: . $5,000 was added to the Education and Training budget for a wellness program. Total Fire Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 4,467,214 $ 4,684,950 4.87% $ 4,776,459 1.95% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 99 FUND: GENERAL FUNCTION: PUBLIC SAFETY AREA: I FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM: 1470 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ACCT. DESCRIPTION 2009 ACTUAL 2010 ACTUAL 2011 2012 BUDGETED 2013 BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION $ 114,880 155,847 $ 117,729 183,512 $ 162,300 165,864 $ 162,300 165,864 $ 162,888 159,372 $ 164,280 162,876 270,727 301,241 328,164 328,164 322,260 327,156 $ 4,312,002 $ 4,441,662 $ 4,467,214 $ 4,467,214 $ 4,684,950 $ 4,776,459 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 100 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I PUBLIC HEALTH 1490 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Public Health - 1490: Public health personal services consist of 2.65 full -time employees and part-time intern help in the summer. The Health Department holds a delegation agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health to license and inspect food, beverage and lodging establishments, institutions such as schools and day cares, and public swimming pools. Responsibilities also include investigating food complaints, reports of food and waterborne illnesses, and disasters such as fires and floods. The Department completes food establishment plan reviews and construction inspections to assure compliance with codes. In addition, the Health Department responds to general complaints, public health nuisance complaints and housing code violations, and acts as a resource for private wells and a variety of health issues such as mold, radon, noise, asbestos and second hand smoke. The Department takes necessary enforcement actions to resolve code violations and health problems within the community. In 2010 the Department issued approximately 400 business licenses and conducted over 200 food establishment inspections, 28 special event food inspections, 4 lodging inspections, nearly 140 swimming pool inspections and 55 carbon monoxide inspections. Twenty reports of foodborne illness were investigated in addition to 4 general food complaints. Plan reviews for 11 food establishments and 7 private swimming pools were completed. In addition, hundreds of recycling inquiries and approximately 190 complaints including general nuisances, public health nuisances and housing issues were addressed. The Department administers grants from the Minnesota Department of Health to provide community health services such as health education and promotion, communicable disease programs, public health nursing services, health assessments. A separate contract is also awarded for public health emergency preparedness and Cities Readiness Initiative in response to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, and threats to public health. Special planning and training is underway for community awareness and responses to pandemic influenza and for general continuity of operations. The Department is also involved with the new Statewide Health Improvement Grant (SHIP) intended to resolve rising health care costs by addressing physical inactivity, poor nutrition and tobacco use. Plans are underway to develop a pertnership with Blue Cross Blue Shield and the cities of Bloomington and Richfield regarding a healthy eating and physical activity initiative. The staff provides support for the Edina Community Health Committee, the Energy and Environment Commission, the Senior Expo, and the Edina Art Fairs. It administers the refuse collection contract for city properties and serves as a resource for occupational health and safety for city employees. Unique activities during recent years include environmental health monitoring of the US Women's Open golf tournament and the Republican National Convention, a major response to the H1N1 influenza pandemic, participating in Abbey's Hope Aquatic Event and tracking compliance on foreclosed properties. Special efforts were dedicated to tracking all public swimming pools to ensure compliance with the Abigail Taylor Act for drain safety. Total Public Health Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 511,602 $ 524,454 2.51% $ 530,722 1.20% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-101 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I PUBLIC HEALTH 1490 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 204,463 $ 211,798 $ 220,106 $ 220,106 $ 227,641 $ 232,194 6030 PENSIONS 13,596 14,531 15,958 15,958 16,504 16,834 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 15,757 15,707 16,838 16,838 17,415 17,763 6040 FLEX PLAN 23,755 23,661 25,440 25,440 25,440 25,949 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 787 859 947 947 1,178 1,202 258,358 266,556 279,289 279,289 288,178 293,942 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 183,933 183,706 187,380 187,380 191,127 191,127 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 980 513 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 604 574 800 800 900 900 6107 MILEAGE 6,774 2,643 6,800 6,800 7,000 7,000 6188 TELEPHONE 274 650 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 192,565 188,086 198,980 198,980 203,027 203,027 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,673 253 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6575 PRINTING - 248 325 325 325 325 1,673 501 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 18,058 15,336 17,148 17,148 16,296 16,440 6804 CITY HALL 9,278 8,915 10,380 10,380 10,608 10,872 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 2,514 3,796 3,480 3,480 4,020 4,116 29,850 28,047 31,008 31,008 30,924 31,428 TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH $ 482,446 $ 483,190 $ 511,602 $ 511,602 $ 524,454 $ 530,722 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 102 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY I INSPECTIONS 1495 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Inspections -1495: Personal services including 7.75 FTEs consist of the Building Official, 4.75 full -time inspectors, 2 full -time support staff, and 3 part-time inspectors /reviewers. The Inspections Department reviewed, issued and performed inspections for 5,612 building, plumbing and heating permits in 2010 - performing over 15,000 inspections. Staff enforces the State Building Code, which includes the International Building Code and the International Residential Code as well as applicable sections of the Edina City Code. 2010 revenue for the various permits issued was as follows: Building Permits $ 1,425,311 Plumbing Permits 147,326 HVAC Permits 283,722 The Building Department also receives 15 to 20 complaint calls per week from residents which are investigated. The department is also responsible for the review, permitting and inspection of non - public grading /fill /excavation projects. Explanation of Change: . 0.25 FTEs were transferred to the Building Department from the Administration Department related to the front desk /switchboard activities at City Hall. . An increase in building permit applications during 2011 is expected to be sustained through 2012, which increases expenditures and building permit revenues. Total Inspections Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 1,089,492 $ 1,167,373 7.15% $ 1,188,891 1.84% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 103 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: PROGRAM: GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY INSPECTIONS SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 538,072 $ 559,721 $ 548,750 $ 548,750 $ 578,638 $ 590,211 6011 OVERTIME 2,239 4,177 5,252 5,252 5,357 5,464 6013 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 144,280 117,916 171,700 171,700 175,134 178,637 6030 PENSIONS 46,263 47,382 52,613 52,613 55,038 56,139 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 51,434 50,052 51,492 51,492 53,836 54,913 6040 FLEX PLAN 62,579 61,181 72,000 72,000 74,400 75,888 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,518 2,623 2,480 2,480 3,036 3,097 847,385 843,052 904,287 904,287 945,439 964,349 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,784 3,965 11,000 11,000 43,000 43,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 3,676 3,964 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 600 750 900 900 900 900 6107 MILEAGE 3,387 221 3,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 6136 PLAN MANAGEMENT 4,527 3,922 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6155 BANK CHARGES 10,606 12,216 9,000 9,000 9,200 9,400 6160 DATA PROCESSING 33,398 36,262 39,589 39,589 39,100 39,600 6188 TELEPHONE 2,932 5,275 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,200 62,910 66,575 75,989 75,989 106,800 107,600 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 757 1,288 1,800 1,800 1,920 1,960 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,075 2,441 2,400 2,400 3,025 3,075 6558 UNIFORMS 2,125 1,822 2,200 2,200 2,525 2,575 6575 PRINTING 1,368 2,643 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 5,325 8,194 8,200 8,200 9,270 9,410 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 39,480 40,415 51,324 51,324 54,792 55,260 6804 CITY HALL 21,018 20,189 29,472 29,472 30,120 30,864 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 18,206 22,077 20,220 20,220 20,952 21,408 78,704 82,681 101,016 101,016 105,864 107,532 TOTAL INSPECTIONS $ 994,324 $ 1,000,502 $ 1,089,492 $ 1,089,492 $ 1,167,373 $ 1,188,891 This page left blank intentionally. j. tit TJ 0 Park & Recreation This page left blank intentionally. Park and Recreation Expenditure Summary Parks & Recreation Expenditures by Function ❑ 2011 ❑ 2012 ❑ 2013 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 Park Administration Recreation Park Maintenance Parks & Recreation Expenditures by Function Q 2011 ❑ 2012 F] 2013 3,000,000 - - -- 2,500,000 — — — — ~— 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 — 500,000 �W... g Personal Services Contractual Services Commodities Central Services - 107- CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 108 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I ADMINISTRATION 1600 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Park Administration -1600: Personal services consist of 6.8 full -time employees and occasional seasonal part-time help in this area. The full -time positions include: 1. Director 2. Assistant Director 3. Recreation Supervisor 4. Recreation Supervisor (Adaptive Recreation) 5. Senior Citizen Director 6. Office Coordinator 7. Secretary Responsibility is to administer and maintain the entire Park and Recreation Department including: 40 parks totaling 1,553 acres of park property, revenue facilities (Golf Courses, 3 indoor ice rinks at Braemar Arena, Aquatic Center, Art Center, Edinborough Park, and Centennial Lakes Park), administering and programming a Senior Citizen's Center, adaptive recreation program, administering and scheduling adult and youth recreational programs and fourteen athletic associations and working closely with and in support of the Edina Garden Council, the Edina Historical Society and the Edina Museum. Total Park & Recreation Budget 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 3,856,413 $ 3,867,268 0.28% $ 3,931,340 1.66% CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 109 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 1600 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 493,150 $ 512,682 $ 520,801 $ 520,801 $ 533,763 $ 544,438 6030 PENSIONS 33,276 35,748 37,758 37,758 38,697 39,471 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 37,137 37,426 39,142 39,142 39,948 40,747 6040 FLEX PLAN 48,325 53,961 65,280 65,280 65,280 66,586 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,726 1,880 1,950 1,950 2,375 2,423 613,614 641,697 664,931 664,931 680,063 693,665 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,769 7,539 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 1,130 5,166 4,444 4,444 4,444 4,444 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,633 1,037 2,896 2,896 2,896 2,896 6106 MEETING EXPENSES 254 119 497 497 497 497 6107 MILEAGE 13,653 3,796 6,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 6155 BANK CHARGES 910 1,114 1,045 1,045 1,045 1,045 6188 TELEPHONE 1,688 1,254 1,722 1,722 1,722 1,722 29,037 20,025 21,604 28,604 28,604 28,604 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS - - 113 113 114 117 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,274 1,750 1,233 1,233 1,245 1,282 6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 222 - 529 529 534 550 6575 PRINTING 8,591 357 1,170 1,170 1,182 1,217 10,087 2,107 3,045 3,045 3,075 3,166 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 43,258 47,922 63,648 63,648 64,644 65,196 6804 CITY HALL 17,137 16,465 19,188 19,188 19,608 20,088 60,395 64,387 82,836 82,836 84,252 85,284 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $ 713,133 $ 728,216 $ 772,416 $ 779,416 $ 795,994 $ 810,719 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 110 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I RECREATION 1621 -1623 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Athletic Activities - 1621: These funds are used to assist fourteen athletic associations and all adult athletic programs in common equipment needs. The 14 youth athletic associations are: Edina Baseball Association, Edina Basketball Association, Edina LaCrosse Association, Edina Girls' Athletic Association, Edina Girls' Traveling Basketball, Edina Youth Softball Association, Edina Swim Club, Edina Fast Pitch Softball Association, Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, Edina Football Association, Jr. Olympic Volleyball Association, Edina Soccer Traveling Club and the Edina Soccer Association. These funds are also used to cover anticipated operating expenses in excess of revenues for the two new City gymnasiums at South View Middle School and the Edina Community Center. Outdoor Ice Rinks - 1622: These funds are used for all supervision, phone service, general supplies, and equipment for 11 warming houses, 11 hockey rinks, and 11 general skating areas. This consists of an 8 -week season; 7 days a week from approximately December 15 to February 21. Tennis Program - 1623: These funds are used for supervision, coaching, USTA memberships, instruction and supplies for approximately 500 tennis program registrants. The Tennis Program includes lessons for students ages 5- adult taught by USTA trained tennis instructors and a six week Team Tennis League, which competes against tennis teams from surrounding communities. Adult skills and drills and private and semi - private lessons round out the total program offerings. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 111 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: ' PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION RECREATION 1621 - 1623 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES - 1621 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 10,388 $ 5,974 $ 8,615 $ 8,615 $ 8,615 $ 8,615 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8,061 284 9,368 9,368 9,462 9,746 TOTAL ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES $ 18,449 $ 6,258 $ 17,983 $ 17,983 $ 18,077 $ 18,361 SKATING & HOCKEY -1622 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6013 PAYROLL $ 48,326 $ 39,442 $ 60,297 $ 60,297 $ 61,503 $ 62,733 6030 PENSIONS 118 94 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 3,697 3,021 4,613 4,613 4,705 4,799 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,943 1,874 1,550 1,550 1,581 1,613 54,084 44,431 66,460 66,460 67,789 69,145 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6107 MILEAGE 854 455 940 940 940 940 6188 TELEPHONE 5,455 5,621 5,637 5,637 5,637 5,637 6,309 6,076 6,577 6,577 6,577 6,577 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 652 486 1,103 1,103 1,114 1,147 TOTAL SKATING & HOCKEY $ 61,045 $ 50,993 $ 74,140 $ 74,140 $ 75,480 $ 76,869 TENNIS PROGRAM -1623 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6013 PAYROLL $ 21,339 $ 24,018 $ 22,598 $ 22,598 $ 23,069 $ 23,530 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES: 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS - 15 110 110 110 110 6107 MILEAGE 106 118 313 313 313 313 106 133 423 423 423 423 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,172 4,369 4,202 4,202 4,244 4,371 TOTAL TENNIS PROGRAM $ 26,617 $ 28,520 $ 27,223 $ 27,223 $ 27,736 $ 28,324 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 112 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PARK & RECREATION I RECREATION 1 1624 -1627 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Youth Summer Recreation Programs (Playground Program, Family Jamboree Special Event, FAB 4 and 5, Nature Camp, Firearms Safety Class and Fishing Clinic) - 1624: These funds are used for the implementation of the summer Playground Program, which is a six -week program offered at various locations open to children ages 6 to 10. These funds are also used for the annual Family Jamboree Special Event, which is an evening of family entertainment at Rosland Park, featuring games, entertainment, refreshments and family fun. This also funds the FAB 4 and 5 Program, which is a summer recreation program for 4 and 5 year -olds that offers weekly themes designed to foster a child's creativity, imagination and curiosity. Each week offers a new adventure filled with crafts, stories, songs and other age- appropriate creative activities. It also funds a Nature Camp Program, which is a four -day (daytime only) nature camp at Rosland Park where day- campers discover the world of nature. They experience nature with a varity of themes. The Firearms Safety Training classes are sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Classes are taught by certified trained instructors at the South Metro Training Facility. New recreation programs, all of which are financially self- sufficient, are offered each year. These programs meet needs that are not offered in the traditional playground programs. Miscellaneous and Special Activities - 1627: These funds are used for miscellaneous special projects and equipment such as the 4th of July Parade, sound system for July 4th concert in the park, special events, dedications and grand openings. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 113 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION RECREATION 1624-1627 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED YOUTH SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAMS - 1624 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6013 PAYROLL $ 46,179 $ 47,295 $ 35,480 $ 35,480 $ 36,220 $ 36,944 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,356 390 6,972 6,972 6,972 6,972 6107 MILEAGE 895 1,173 715 715 715 715 4,251 1,563 7,687 7,687 7,687 7,687 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8,774 17,165 10,716 10,716 10,823 11,148 TOTAL YOUTH SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAMS $ 59,204 $ 66,023 $ 53,883 $ 53,883 $ 54,730 $ 55,779 MISCELLANEOUS & SPECIAL ACTIVITIES - 1627 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6013 PAYROLL $ 2,685 $ 2,122 $ 5,350 $ 5,350 $ 5,461 $ 5,570 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,800 5,581 6,892 6,892 6,892 6,892 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 169 435 4,800 4,800 4,848 4,993 6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES - - 116 116 117 121 169 435 4,916 4,916 4,965 5,114 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS & SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $ 14,654 $ 8,138 $ 17,158 $ 17,158 $ 17,318 $ 17,576 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 114 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I RECREATION 1628 -1629 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Senior Citizens -1628: These funds now reflect expenditures for all senior citizen programs, classes, trips and mailings, plus all expenditures related to operating the new Edina Senior Citizen Center at Grandview Square. Adaptive Recreation - 1629: The adaptive recreation budget provides part -time seasonal .staff for adaptive programs and inclusion services for children with disabilities in Edina programs who need a 1:1 staff person. It also includes professional services, which pay for sign language interpreters, contracted adaptive staff, and other miscellaneous staff expenses. General supplies cover all adaptive equipment and supplies for the variety of inclusion and adaptive recreation programs held year -round for youth and adults with disabilities. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 115 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I RECREATION 1628-1629 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED SENIOR CITIZENS - 1628 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6013 PAYROLL $ 28,294 $ 26,327 $ 30,199 $ 30,199 $ 30,803 $ 31,419 6030 PENSIONS 1,774 1,780 2,189 2,189 2,233 2,278 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 2,112 1,968 2,310 2,310 2,356 2,403 6040 FLEX PLAN 610 509 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 185 147 51 51 55 56 32,975 30,731 34,749 34,749 35,447 36,156 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 76,148 59,251 70,000 82,123 82,123 82,123 6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 173 503 1,398 1,398 1,398 1,398 6185 LIGHT AND POWER 22,785 20,211 24,000 29,730 29,730 29,730 6186 HEAT 3,118 4,739 7,000 13,382 13,382 13,382 6188 TELEPHONE 4,196 4,166 4,614 4,614 4,614 4,614 6189 SEWER & WATER 737 2,109 1,165 1,165 1,165 1,165 6235 POSTAGE 3,825 4,385 4,299 4,299 4,299 4,299 110,982 95,364 112,476 136,711 136,711 136,711 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,186 7,289 6,216 6,216 6,278 6,466 6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 943 1,074 1,560 1,560 1,576 1,623 6575 PRINTING 12,383 10,494 8,521 8,521 8,606 8,864 19,512 18,857 16,297 16,297 16,460 16,953 TOTAL SENIOR CITIZENS $ 163,469 $ 144,952 $ 163,522 $ 187,757 $ 188,618 $ 189,820 ADAPTIVE RECREATION -1629 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6013 PAYROLL $ 16,272 $ 15,710 $ 20,806 $ 20,806 $ 21,222 $ 21,646 6030 PENSIONS 526 517 - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 1,245 1,202 1,592 1,592 1,623 1,655 6040 FLEX PLAN - - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 255 281 92 92 112 114 18,298 17,710 22,490 22,490 22,957 23,415 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,526 6,705 13,982 13,982 13,982 13,982 COMMODITIES: 6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS - - 116 116 117 121 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,700 5,213 3,512 3,512 3,547 3,653 6575 PRINTING 3,273 1,832 2,458 2,458 2,483 2,557 7,973 7,045 6,086 6,086 6,147 6,331 TOTAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION $ 33,797 $ 31,460 $ 42,558 $ 42,558 $ 43,086 $ 43,728 TOTAL RECREATION $ 377,235 $ 336,344 $ 396,467 $ 420,702 $ 425,045 $ 430,457 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 116 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PARK & RECREATION I PARK MAINTENANCE SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Park Maintenance Payroll Distribution Park maintenance consists of 16.4 FTEs, including a shared full -time park maintenance worker who maintains the Edina Aquatic Center during the summer and perfoms general park maintenance duties during the remainder of the year. Not included in the FTE count are a part- time year -round contracted Forester, and a part-time seasonal weed inspector. An additional full - time park maintenance position remains unfunded due to a retirement in 2003 that was not reinstated. 0.75 Superintendent 1.00 Foreman 13.65 Park Maintenance Staff 1.00 Janitor 16.40 Total FTE's 1 Contract Forester (part-time year round) 1 Contract Weed Inspector (part-time seasonal) 1 Non - reinstated park maintenance worker since 2003 retirement Park Maintenance $ 1,607,925 Charged to (from) other departments & funds: Public Works (40,702) Enterprise funds 35,437 Total Park Maint. payroll $ 1,602,660 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 117 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL I PARK & RECREATION I PARK MAINTENANCE SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES This page is intentionally left blank. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 118 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I MAINTENANCE 1 1640 -1641 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES General Maintenance - 1640: This account handles the paid leave, training and equipment maintenance for the park maintenance programs. Paid leave includes sick, vacation, and holiday pay. Mowing - 1641: Funds from this account are used for maintenance of all manicured grass area consisting of 422 different areas all mowed and maintained with a minimum of 10 days between cuttings. All scheduled athletic fields are maintained every 5 working days and several weekends throughout the season. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 119 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION MAINTENANCE 1640-1641 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED GENERAL MAINTENANCE -1640 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 186,582 $ 156,691 $ 973,893 $ 973,893 $ 973,898 $ 993,376 6011 OVERTIME 28,282 20,291 33,532 33,532 34,203 34,887 6013 PART TIME 8,549 5,544 220,281 220,281 224,686 229,180 6030 PENSIONS 12,467 12,233 89,007 89,007 89,380 91,168 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 14,141 12,983 93,918 93,918 94,305 96,191 6040 FLEX PLAN 28,347 22,552 158,411 158,411 158,353 161,520 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 4,585 3,861 33,372 33,372 33,100 33,762 282,953 234,155 1,602,414 1,602,414 1,607,925 1,640,084 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 5,435 7,504 9,050 9,050 9,050 9,050 6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 238 - - - - - 6188 TELEPHONE 5,042 4,971 2,715 2,715 2,715 2,715 6201 LAUNDRY 246 281 - - - - 10,961 12,756 11,765 11,765 11,765 11,765 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16 417 1,406 1,406 1,420 1,463 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 37,024 37,252 53,484 53,484 48,720 49,140 6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 33,166 41,883 44,436 44,436 44,460 45,012 6808 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 219,258 246,316 223,188 223,188 210,312 214,944 289,448 325,451 321,108 321,108 303,492 309,096 TOTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE $ 583,378 $ 572,779 $ 1,936,693 $ 1,936,693 $ 1,924,602 $ 1,962,408 MOWING -1641 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 101,895 $ 119,846 $ - $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS 23,166 29,637 - - - - 125,061 149,483 - - - - COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 297 371 1,854 1,854 1,873 1,929 6530 REPAIR PARTS 529 1,195 - - - - 6556 TOOLS 272 312 - - - - 1,098 1,878 1,854 1,854 1,873 1,929 TOTAL MOWING $ 126,159 $ 151,361 $ 1,854 $ 1,854 $ 1,873 $ 1,929 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 120 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION MAINTENANCE 1642 -1643 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Field Maintenance -1642: All sports fields are specially prepared for scheduled games. These fields are dragged and field lined with a chalk material. A special mixture (agricultural lime) is used each spring for filling holes and regrading is done as needed during the playing season. All of the field areas are fertilized each year and the grass is treated with herbicides. The grassy playing surfaces in all of these parks are aerated, seeded and /or sodded when necessary to maintain safe ground cover. This account is supplemented by an $11 field use fee from participants. The table below shows amounts contributed from various activities during the past two years. Activity Adult Soccer Adult Baseball Adult Softball Edina Baseball Association EGAA Flag Football Edina Youth Softball Association Edina Girls Fast Pitch Softball Edina Soccer Assoc. & Soccer Club Edina Football Association Edina Lacrosse Association Miscellaneous Field Rentals Total General Turf Care - 1643: 2009 $ 5,244 2,648 5,100 22,902 2,610 1,845 1,026 35,334 7,680 3,537 2,241 $ 90,167 2010 2,727 20,415 2,790 1,404 765 36,117 7,650 3,915 $ 75,783 The funds in this program provide for all city properties and general park maintenance. This includes the contracted spraying of weeds (dandelions) twice a year in areas that are in keeping with Edina's Turf Management Plan. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 121 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I MAINTENANCE 1642-1643 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED FIELD MAINTENANCE -1642 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 219,242 $ 220,235 $ - $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS 45,889 44,393 - - - - 265,131 264,628 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,712 21,600 6,386 6,386 6,386 6,386 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 15 3,797 1,858 1,858 1,858 1,858 14,727 25,397 8,244 8,244 8,244 8,244 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,719 7,208 6,659 6,659 6,726 6,928 6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,485 1,254 - - - - 6540 FERTILIZER - 6,861 5,995 5,995 6,055 6,237 6542 INFIELD MIXTURE 8,345 8,162 4,392 4,392 4,436 4,569 6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 4,062 2,055 - - - - 6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 11,580 10,240 11,810 11,810 11,928 12,286 6546 WEED SPRAY - - 665 665 672 692 6547 SEED - 556 1,756 1,756 1,774 1,827 6556 TOOLS - 810 - - - - 31,191 37,146 31,277 31,277 31,591 32,539 TOTAL FIELD MAINTENANCE $ 311,049 $ 327,171 $ 39,521 $ 39,521 $ 39,835 $ 40,783 GENERAL TURF CARE - 1643 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 115,525 $ 96,117 $ - $ - $ - $ - BENEFITS 27,144 23,140 - - - - 142,669 119,257 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,378 10,832 8,990 8,990 8,990 8,990 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 254 330 - - - - 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 363 56 6,890 6,890 6,890 6,890 6260 LICENSES AND PERMITS 105 - 263 263 263 263 16,100 11,218 16,143 16,143 16,143 16,143 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 395 983 6,400 6,400 6,464 6,658 6517 SAND, GRAVEL, & ROCK - - 1,464 1,464 1,479 1,523 6530 REPAIR PARTS 4,143 2,642 - - - - 6540 FERTILIZER 7,950 2,009 13,550 13,550 13,686 14,097 6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 1,817 1,230 2,795 2,795 2,823 2,908 6546 WEED SPRAY 8,607 7,693 7,682 7,682 7,759 7,992 6547 SEED 6,643 2,706 6,822 6,822 6,890 7,097 6556 TOOLS 1,184 2,393 - - - - 30,739 19,656 38,713 38,713 39,101 40,275 TOTAL GENERAL TURF CARE $ 189,508 $ 150,131 $ 54,856 $ 54,856 $ 55,244 $ 56,418 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 122 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I MAINTENANCE 1644 -1645 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Forestry - 1644: These funds are used to administer a comprehensive park and boulevard forestry program plus removal of diseased trees on private properties. This account includes contracted tree removal and stump removal of all trees that are diseased (diseased trees on private properties are contracted for removal only when necessary). This account provides for maintenance of tree trimming on boulevard and park trees as well as contractual oak wilt disease identification, control and prevention program. All boulevard tree trimming and removal is assessed to the property owner. Litter Removal -1645: These funds are used for maintenance and removal of all trash from 40 park areas on a daily basis in season or a weekly basis throughout the year. This also includes the purchase of trash containers. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 123 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I MAINTENANCE 1644-1645 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED FORESTRY -1644 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 164,827 $ 149,513 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 1,255 6,278 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 10,346 9,919 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 12,717 11,922 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 10,274 9,180 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,937 3,819 - - - - 203,356 190,631 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,946 12,566 17,891 17,891 17,891 17,891 6104 CONTINUING EDUCATION 470 510 - - - - 6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 4,300 3,842 2,513 2,513 2,513 2,513 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 614 - 14,710 14,710 14,710 14,710 6182 TREE WASTE DISPOSAL 9,042 5,966 16,313 16,313 16,313 16,313 25,372 22,884 51,427 51,427 51,427 51,427 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,595 862 2,342 2,342 2,365 2,436 6541 PLANTING & TREES 8,902 10,453 10,539 10,539 10,644 10,963 6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT - 7,027 7,027 7,097 7,310 6556 TOOLS 5,618 1,833 2,663 2,663 2,690 2,771 16,115 13,148 22,571 22,571 22,796 23,480 TOTAL FORESTRY $ 244,843 $ 226,663 $ 73,998 $ 73,998 $ 74,223 $ 74,907 LITTER REMOVAL - 1645 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 28,955 $ 22,850 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 963 58 - - - - BENEFITS 6,749 5,245 - - - - 36,667 28,153 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 3,785 5,094 8,348 8,348 8,348 8,348 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9,261 2,297 9,588 9,588 9,684 9,975 TOTAL LITTER REMOVAL $ 49,713 $ 35,544 $ 17,936 $ 17,936 $ 18,032 $ 18,323 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 124 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION MAINTENANCE 1646 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Building Maintenance - 1646: These funds are used for the maintenance, repair, and cleaning of 27 buildings in the park system. These funds are also used for the upkeep and new construction of 11 hockey rinks in the park system. Buildings Maintained 1 Arden Park Shelter 2 . Arneson Gazebo 3 . Arneson Greenhouse 4 . Arneson Historical House 5 . Braemar Complex 6 . Bredeson Comfort Station 7 . Cahill School Building 8 . Chowen Picnic Shelter 9 . Cornelia School Park Shelter 10 . Countryside Park Shelter 11 Creek Valley Park Shelter 12 . Edina Senior Center 13 . Garden Comfort Station 14 . Grange Hall 15 . Highlands Park Shelter 16 . Lewis Park Shelter 17 . Normandale Park Shelter 18 . Pamela Park Shelter 19 . Rosland Park Picnic Shelter 20 . Rosland Park Comfort Station 21 Strachauer Park Shelter 22 . Todd Park Shelter 23 . Wooddale Picnic Shelter 24 . Utley Park Restrooms 25 . Van Valkenburg Complex 26 . Walnut Ridge Park Shelter 27 . Weber Park Shelter CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 125 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION MAINTENANCE 1646 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 1646 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 195,808 $ 194,507 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 3,558 4,184 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 13,035 13,476 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 14,996 14,758 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 22,259 24,731 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 4,826 5,077 - - - - 254,482 256,733 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18,121 23,233 15,839 15,839 15,839 15,839 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7,371 5,059 7,140 7,140 7,140 7,140 6185 LIGHT & POWER 68,324 54,892 60,000 79,320 79,320 79,320 6186 HEAT 31,423 19,732 30,000 44,683 44,683 44,683 6188 TELEPHONE 10,675 8,049 10,068 10,068 10,068 10,068 6189 SEWER & WATER 896 450 1,696 1,696 1,696 1,696 6201 LAUNDRY 12,228 11,172 14,290 14,290 14,290 14,290 149,038 122,587 139,033 173,036 173,036 173,036 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 31,606 45,582 32,000 36,379 36,743 37,845 6517 SAND, GRAVEL & ROCK - 1,112 1,000 - - - 6530 REPAIR PARTS 4,542 1,734 12,506 12,506 12,631 13,010 6556 TOOLS 3,835 8,010 8,868 8,868 8,957 9,226 6577 LUMBER 1,988 713 5,000 11,879 11,998 12,358 6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES 6,421 1,166 3,979 3,979 4,019 4,140 6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 7,499 6,742 6,004 6,004 6,064 6,246 55,891 65,059 69,357 79,615 80,412 82,825 TOTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE $ 459,411 $ 444,379 $ 208,390 $ 252,651 $ 253,448 $ 255,861 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 126 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I MAINTENANCE 1647 -1648 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Paths, Hard Surfaces, Hockey Rinks and Park Amenities Maintenance -1647: These funds are used for the maintenance of all hard surface areas within the park system. This includes the resurfacing of 26 tennis courts, resurfacing and maintaining 8 hard surface basketball courts, and maintenance and surfacing of 10 miles of walking and bicycling paths within the park system. These funds are also used for the maintenance and replacement of 23 playground equipment sites, plus park lighting, picnic tables, bleachers, tables, chairs, park benches, signs and drinking fountains throughout Edina's 40 parks. Skating Rink Maintenance -1648: These funds are used for flooding and maintaining an operation of 11 hockey rinks and 11 general skating areas. This account is supplemented by an $11 per participant user fee. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 127 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION I MAINTENANCE 1647-1648 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PATHS & HARD SURFACES - 1647 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 21,763 $ 29,150 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 3,157 7,449 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 1,682 2,459 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 1,876 2,742 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 2,455 3,572 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 485 704 - - - - 31,418 46,076 - - - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145,510 127,630 200,000 245,208 245,208 245,208 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 16,027 257 - - - - 161,537 127,887 200,000 245,208 245,208 245,208 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 14,774 11,263 7,000 4,929 4,978 5,127 6517 SAND, GRAVEL & ROCK 2,883 1,794 6,000 - - - 6518 BLACKTOP - - 2,000 3,992 4,032 4,153 6519 ROAD OIL - - 2,000 3,061 3,092 3,185 6530 REPAIR PARTS 8,488 2,827 7,000 - - - 26,145 15,884 24,000 11,982 12,102 12,465 TOTAL PATHS & HARD SURFACE MAINTENANCE $ 219,100 $ 189,84 $$ 224,000 $ 257,190 $ 257,310 $ 257,673 SKATING RINK MAINT. - 1648 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 125,158 $ 158,754 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME 34,745 15,053 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 10,788 12,216 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 11,531 12,412 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 20,135 22,234 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,333 4,204 - - - - 205,690 224,873 - - - - CONTRACTURAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,347 3,325 - - - COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,094 652 4,333 4,333 4,376 4,507 6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,208 5,202 2,263 2,263 2,286 2,355 4,302 5,854 6,596 6,596 6,662 6,862 TOTAL SKATING RINK MAINT. $ 211,339 $ 234,052 $ 6,596 $ 6,596 $ 6,662 $ 6,862 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 128 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION MAINTENANCE 1652 -1654 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Weed Mowing - 1652: These funds are used for the control and removal of noxious weeds located on park property as well as other city properties. It is also used to handle all city properties, public and private, that are not in compliance with our clear view and weed and noxious growth ordinances. The private properties are later assessed for reimbursement. Equipment - 1654: This account provides funding for the replacement of existing Park Maintenance equipment and for the purchase of any new additional equipment needed for maintenance of all parks. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-129 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: O PROGRAM: GENERAL PARK & RECREATION MAINTENANCE 1652-1654 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED WEED MOWING - 1652 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 9,924 $ 14,702 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6011 OVERTIME - 232 - - - - 6030 PENSIONS 52 60 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 757 1,138 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 121 149 - - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 229 372 - - - - 11,083 16,653 - - - - CONTRACTURAL SERVICES: 6107 MILEAGE 454 439 - - - - COMMODITIES: 6546 WEED SPRAY - - - - - TOTAL WEED MOWING $ 11,537 $ 17,092 $ - $ - $ - $ EQUIPMENT - 1654 PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 45,180 $ 35,929 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6030 PENSIONS 3,050 2,515 - - - - 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 3,373 2,656 - - - - 6040 FLEX PLAN 5,909 4,940 - - - 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 984 916 - - - 58,496 46,956 - - - - TOTAL EQUIPMENT $ 58,496 $ 46,956 $ - $ - $ - $ - CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 130 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL PARKS & RECREATION DEER CONTROL 1509 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Deer Control Program -1509: This program was authorized by the Council to reduce the City's deer population. CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE -131 FUND: GENERAL FUNCTION: PARK & RECREATION I AREA: DEER CONTROL PROGRAM: 1509 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ACCT. DESCRIPTION 2009 ACTUAL 2010 ACTUAL 2011 2012 BUDGETED 2013 BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED DEER CONTROL PROGRAM -1509 PERSONAL SERVICES: PAYROLL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TOTAL DEER CONTROL TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE $ 13,184 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1,570 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 - - - - - $ 14,754 $ $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 2,479,287 $ 2,395,975 $ 2,578,844 $ 2,656,295 $ 2,646,229 $ 2,690,164 This page left blank intentionally. I : MIw_ Other Governmental Funds HRA FUND CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET The HRA was established in 1974 for the purpose of undertaking urban redevelopment projects and assisting with the development of affordable housing. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the City. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of the City's operations because the members of the City Council serve as HRA board members and its activity is confined to the City of Edina. The HRA has been the driving force behind the 50th and France commercial area renewal, as well as the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes mixed development projects. The special revenue HRA fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (tax increments, bond proceeds, investment earnings, etc.) that are designated for housing and redevelopment. Due to the involvement of tax increment (TIF) dollars, there are legal restrictions on how the money in this fund may be spent. --------- -- --------------------------------------------- -- ....._ - - - -.. ----- - .. ----------- i . -.. -. --- --------- - - - - -- HRA Fund 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 I 4,000, 000 2,000,000 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Revenues OExpenditures and other financing uses —0—,Fund balance I -134- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA e ' G O � r Q OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Revenues Tax increments Investment income Total revenues Expenditures and other financing uses Personal services Contractual services Capital outlay Transfers Total expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted $ 7,587,386 $ 4,488,073 $ 3,972,190 $ 3,972,190 $ 3,980,000 $ 3,990,000 183,592 207,464 133,000 133,000 118,000 169,000 7,770,978 4,695,537 4,105,190 4,105090 4,098,000 4,159,000 28,377 21,812 1,603,607 1,529,077 2,215,633 215,929 R Iqn ?qF Qqn urn 20,771 20,771 674,174 674,174 - 4,000,000 Q'id 'ISO QRd '3 FQ `J,`.H3 I,0J3 L,Oy /,OJb I,OLy,JV4 J,OL�,JU4 171,600 694,000 200,000 1,978,445 3,044,045 175,030 711,000 3,000,000 559,350 4,445,380 Change in fund balance (2,210,875) 1,997,899 2,475,886 (1,524,114) 1,053,955 (286,380) January 1 fund balance 13,537,673 11,326,798 13,324,697 13,324,697 15,800,583 16,854,538 December 31 fund balance $11,326,798 $13,324,697 $15,800,583 $11,800,583 $16,854,538 $16,568,158 The HRA fund had a fund balance of $13,324,697 as of December 31, 2010. The City intends to use this money to pay TIF debt service costs as well as to finance future infrastructure improvements. Most recently, the HRA fund paid for improvements to the Edina Promenade. Two TIF districts, 50th & France and Edinborough, decertified in 2009 and another district, Grandview, decertified in 2010. This leaves Centennial Lakes as the only district to continue to generate TIF revenue in 2011 and beyond, and is the reason why tax increment revenue declined in 2010 and 2011. The Centennial Lakes district decertifies in 2016. Also, one new FTE employee is proposed to be added to the HRA fund beginning in 2012. -135- CDBG FUND CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is a federal entitlement program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) who in turn, charges Hennepin County to oversee the distribution of funds to its communities. These funds are to be directed toward improving housing opportunities and providing a suitable living environment for persons with low and moderate incomes. As a recipient of HUD funds, the County and each community must affirmatively further fair housing. Hennepin County encourages all communities to be proactive by addressing impediments to fair housing choices. HUD stipulates that funding for public services may not exceed 15% of the total budget. CDBG Fund 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 , 50,000 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ® Revenues Expenditures Fund balance -136- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Revenues Intergovernmental $ 278,052 $ 126,921 $ 161,303 $ 161,303 $ 145,365 $ 145,365 Total revenues 278,052 126,921 161,303 161,303 145,365 145,365 Expenditures Personal services 8,170 5,784 10,484 10,484 10,702 10,916 Contractual services 269,882 121,137 150,819 150,819 134,663 134,449 Total expenditures 278,052 126,921 161,303 161,303 145,365 145,365 Change in fund balance - - - - - - January 1 fund balance - - - - - - December 31 fund balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CDBG is a reimbursement grant, which means that eligible City expenditures are reimbursed 100 %. The CDBG program year starts on July 1 every year and funds are available for expenditure for 18 months from that date. This is different from the calendar -year the City uses for budgeting purposes and can result in significant timing differences in the budget to actual comparisons for a particular calendar year. There are no major changes planned for the CDBG grant fund that will have a significant effect on the 2012 -2013 budget. We will submit a preliminary funding proposal to Hennepin County in February and Hennepin County will announce a final budget in May 2012. -137- V: 0 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND The City uses the Police Special Revenue Fund to account for several different revenue sources within the Police Department, each with special purposes: • E911. Minnesota state statute provides for the collection and use of E911 fees to fund the implementation, operation, maintenance, enhancement and expansion of enhanced 911 service, including the acquisition of necessary equipment. E911 revenue is received monthly and must be deposited into an interest - bearing fund or account separate from the city's general fund. An annual audit is conducted to ensure compliance. • Federal forfeiture. The City of Edina has entered into the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement with the Federal Government. The federal government sets forth the requirements for the program and the restrictions upon the use of federally forfeited cash, property, proceeds, and any interest earned. These funds may not be co- mingled with other forfeiture funds. • State forfeiture. Minnesota law permits a court to order the forfeiture of certain property associated with the commission of "designated offenses" and controlled substances. Designated offenses include most serious felonies against persons, a number of property felonies, unauthorized computer access and prostitution. The limited distribution of these funds is regulated under MN. State Statute 609.5315. • DWI forfeiture. Minnesota's DWI law provides for vehicle forfeiture under certain circumstances. A motor vehicle may be forfeited under this law only if the driver is convicted of the designated offense on which the forfeiture is based, fails to appear in court on the impaired driving charge, or the driver's conduct results in a license revocation. The proceeds may only be used for use in DWI - related enforcement, training, and education activities. Police Special Revenue Fund 1,000, 000 500,000 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Q Revenues C7 Expenditures W—Fund balance -138- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET December 31 fund balance $ 533,443 $ 579,959 $ 600,727 $ 595,830 $ 410,254 $ 329,781 These are volatile accounts that are based solely on income from criminal activity. With the exception of the E911 account, revenues vary wildly each year for each of the special revenue purposes. Because we cannot predict the criminal activity that triggers the forfeiture process, it is difficult to predict the revenue for these accounts. We are bound by very specific statutes regarding how this money may be spent, if and /or when proceeds are received, thus it is not easily worked into an annual budget. For these accounts we have presented a budget based on an average of the past several years of revenues. -139- 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Revenues Intergovernmental $ 68,340 $ 68,765 $ 104,760 $ 104,760 $ 104,760 $ 104,760 Fines and forfeitures 76,543 40,794 57,000 52,103 57,821 57,821 Investment income 278 1,037 600 600 600 600 Total revenues 145,161 110,596 162,360 157,463 163,181 163,181 Expenditures Personal services 565 - - - - - Contractual services 156,281 47,988 51,915 86,695 85,574 85,574 Commodities 11,574 4,141 40,252 2,133 18,655 18,655 Capital outlay 21,862 11,951 49,425 52,764 249,425 139,425 Total expenditures 190,282 64,080 141,592 141,592 353,654 243,654 Change in fund balance (45,121) 46,516 20,768 15,871 (190,473) (80,473) January 1 fund balance 578,564 533,443 579,959 579,959 600,727 410,254 December 31 fund balance $ 533,443 $ 579,959 $ 600,727 $ 595,830 $ 410,254 $ 329,781 These are volatile accounts that are based solely on income from criminal activity. With the exception of the E911 account, revenues vary wildly each year for each of the special revenue purposes. Because we cannot predict the criminal activity that triggers the forfeiture process, it is difficult to predict the revenue for these accounts. We are bound by very specific statutes regarding how this money may be spent, if and /or when proceeds are received, thus it is not easily worked into an annual budget. For these accounts we have presented a budget based on an average of the past several years of revenues. -139- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND The Braemar Memorial Fund was created in 1976 by Edina resident "Babe" LeVoir for the purpose of enhancing the golf course with equipment and amenities that might not otherwise be affordable or viewed as a necessity to the golf course. The donations and expenses were accounted for as part of the Golf Course enterprise fund until the Braemar Memorial Special Revenue Fund was formally recognized by the City Council in May 2010 in conjunction with one of the largest donations ever made to Braemar Golf Course. A donation of more than $312,000 was offered from the estate of Wally and Ruth Dahl to the Braemar Memorial Fund. Before any disbursements are made from the fund the Braemar Golf Club General Manager's recommendation must be considered who will interface with the Braemar Golf Association, and the Braemar Men's and Women's Clubs to obtain recommendations for the use of said funds. -140- Braemar Memorial Fund 350,000 300,000 1 �_ 2 50, 000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 E= Revenues 0 Expenditures —A—Fund balance -140- - CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 7,011 9,000 7,500 25,000 ..� OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS .,.; ANNUAL BUDGET - 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 - Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Revenues 13,439 Donations $ 2,905 $ 315,617 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Investment income - 664 300 300 300 300 Total revenues 2,905 316,281 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 Expenditures Contractual services 13,439 7,011 9,000 7,500 25,000 25,000 Capital outlay - - - - - - Total expenditures 13,439 7,011 9,000 7,500 25,000 25,000 Change in fund balance (10,534) 309,270 (5,700) (4,200) (21,700) (21,700) January 1 fund balance 11,205 671 309,941 309,941 304,241 282,541 December 31 fund balance $ 671 $ 309,941 $ 304,241 $ 305,741 $ 282,541 $ 260,841 The large increase in fund balance in 2010 reflects the one -time gift from the estate of Wally and Ruth Dahl. There are currently no finalized plans for the use of the money. Because this fund accounts for donations, future revenues are unknown. Likewise, because the expenditure of funds requires the approval of several different groups, future expenditures are also unknown. The budget shown above anticipates donations and expenditures based on averages of the past couple years, excluding the uniaue Dahl donation. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DEBT SERVICE FUND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET The debt service fund accounts for the payment of principal and interest on the City's outstanding debt, except for debt that is specifically related to and secured by the revenues of one of the City's enterprise funds, which are accounted for directly in the appropriate fund. Currently the City has Tax Increment, General Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, and Public Project Revenue Bonds outstanding that are accounted for in the debt service fund. - ----- --------------- ---------- ---- - ----- Debt Service Fund 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 -- ----- 4,000,000 2,000,000 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1111111W Revenues and other financing sources D Expenditures --0—,Fund balance -142- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Expenditures Debt service 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Total expenditures Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Revenues and other 1,785,508 650,726 211,210 (68,115) (312,910) (78,648) financing sources 3,668,624 5,454,132 6,104,858 6,104,858 6,316,068 6,003,158 Property taxes $ 3,092,107 $ 3,758,251 $ 3,790,145 $ 3,790,145 $ 3,651,752 $ 3,930,418 Special assessments 1,508,662 1,339,350 1,817,069 1,817,069 1,871,169 2,072,269 Investment income 35,151 31,457 30,500 30,500 30,200 30,000 Transfers 6,338,205 951,492 1,312,889 934,359 1,978,445 559,350 –— Bonds- issued 67,-725 9,224,004- - - -- - Total revenues 11, 041, 850 15, 304, 554 6,950,603 6,572,073 7,531,566 6,592,037 Expenditures Debt service 9,256,342 14,653,828 6,739,393 6,640,188 7,844,476 6,670,685 Total expenditures 9,256,342 14,653,828 6,739,393 6,640,188 7,844,476 6,670,685 Change in fund balance 1,785,508 650,726 211,210 (68,115) (312,910) (78,648) January 1 fund balance 3,668,624 5,454,132 6,104,858 6,104,858 6,316,068 6,003,158 December 31 fund balance $ 5,454,132 $ 6,104,858 $ 6,316,068 $ 6,036,743 $ 6,003,158 $ 5,924,510 The City had $88,135,000 of debt outstanding on December 31, 2010. Of this amount, $64,760,000 was related to governmental funds and therefore expected to be paid by the debt service fund. In 2012 total debt service expenditures are expected to increase due to a large final payment on TIF debt originally issued in 2002. -143- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION FUND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET The Construction fund accounts for the various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for capital improvements as designated in the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), including improvements to parks and facilities. Beginning in 2010, the Construction fund also started accounting for the Equipment Replacement Program, which uses property tax revenue to finance equipment replacements for General Fund departments. i Construction Fund 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 i 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Revenues and other financing sources C Expenditures and otherfinancing uses . ®Fund balance -144- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET December 31- fund balance$ - 16452;889 $15;506;944 - -$10- 105, -378 $14;053;086 -$8 -191, -284 $- 7;552;068 More information about the Construction fund activities, including details about individual projects, can be found in the City's annual CIP document, which is available in PDF format on the Finance Department page of the City's website. -145- 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Revenues and other financing sources Property taxes $ - $ 919,275 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 MVHC loss - - (312,283) (312,283) - - Special assessments 1,195,171 5,406,836 1,303,833 397,289 1,329,343 1,380,052 License and permits 23,828 26,373 25,000 - 25,000 25,000 Intergovernmental 276,129 2,753,469 4,490,000 4,490,000 50,000 50,000 Charges for services 146,246 105,333 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 Investment income 109,936 95,535 102,611 102,611 151,600 122,900 Other revenues 16,120 7,818 - - - - Transfers 4,244,468 1,186,499 950,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Debt issued 22,871,419 2,494,654 3,307,764 5,807,000 3,131,700 3,451,500 Other financing sources - 134,329 - 55,000 - - Total revenues 28,883,317 13,130,121 10,908,997 11,781,689 5,979,715 6,321,524 Expenditures and other financing sources Personal services 182,347 166,491 80,000 - 88,544 90,315 Contractual services 527,589 282,388 218,056 - 210,064 208,281 Commodities 87,821 65,107 25,000 - 25,000 25,000 Central services 2,298 1,733 1,944 - 1,392' 1,4041 Equipment - 1,244,480 927,587 927,587 1,797,309 598,600 Capital outlay 20,224,063 12,045,418 14,459,976 11,709,960 5,081,500 5,572,340 Transfers 476,044 270,449 598,000 598,000 690,000 464,800 Total expenditures 21,500,162 14,076,066 16,310,563 13,235,547 7,893,809 6,960,740 Change in fund balance 7,383,155 (945,945) (5,401,566) (1,453,858) (1,914,094) (639,216) January 1 fund balance 9,069,734 16,452,889 15,506,944 15,506,944 10,105,378 8,191,284 December 31- fund balance$ - 16452;889 $15;506;944 - -$10- 105, -378 $14;053;086 -$8 -191, -284 $- 7;552;068 More information about the Construction fund activities, including details about individual projects, can be found in the City's annual CIP document, which is available in PDF format on the Finance Department page of the City's website. -145- This page left blank intentionally. i '� - W4 Enterprise Funds CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET UTILITY FUND The City of Edina's Utility fund is used to account for water pumping, treatment and distribution as well as sanitary sewer collection and disposal, storm water collection, and recycling. The Utility fund employs 16.7 FTE employees. The City operates two separate water systems: The Morningside water system and the Edina water system. The Morningside system is supplied with treated surface water purchased from the City of Minneapolis. While the water is from Minneapolis, Edina's Utility Department maintains the system's piping. The Edina system gets its water from 18 groundwater wells, ranging from 450 to 1,100 feet deep. Faced with increasing capital costs, the City increased user rates consistently since 2006. In addition, in 2007 the City modified water rates to add usage tiers (sometimes referred to as "conservation pricing "). The usage tiers charge higher water rates at higher levels of consumption. All cities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area serving more than 1,000 people were required by the State of Minnesota to implement conservation pricing by January 1, 2010. The City also participates in the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer system. This means that the City does not maintain its own sanitary sewer treatment plant. Instead, the City's sanitary sewer system flows to the MCES treatment plant and the City pays MCES for the disposal service. This contract is the largest expense in the Utility fund, costing the City over $4.3 million in 2011. Utility Fund 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 . �' ■ Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Operating revenues DOperating expenses °k —Fund net assets —NJ—Cash balance - -- - - - - ...__._..._._..- _....._ ---- ----- - - - - -- - - ..._._._..----- --------- - -- - - --- ---- -- _...... - ..... i -148- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Operating expenses 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Cost of sales and services Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues 1732 ,097 1555,506 1720,905 1725,287 1,695,124 1,725,272 Utilitysales $ 14,484,863 $ 14,635,480 $ 15,184,073 $ 15,347,720 $ 15,656,953 $ 15,402,820 Otherfees 372,935 399,401 411,000 456,200 408,090 416,273 Total revenues 14, 857,798 15,034,881 15,595, 073 15 ,803,920 16,065,043 16,819,093 Operating expenses Cost of sales and services 52,786 10,075 1,862 45,000 - - Personal services 1732 ,097 1555,506 1720,905 1725,287 1,695,124 1,725,272 Contractual services 5,989,392 6,240,639 6,339,896 6,890,036 6,836,237 7,092,708 Commodities 888,411 795,569 874,950 1,040,500 1,038,650 1,056,250 Central services 501693 543,293 539,640 539,640 619,452 630,348 Depreciation 1,650,837 1973,971 2,226,271 1,805,000 2,365,000 2,600,000 Total expenses 10,815,216 11119,053 11703, 524 12,045,463 12,554,463 13,1D4,578 Operating income (loss) 4,042,582 3,915,828 3,891,549 3,758,457 3,510,580 3,714,515 Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Intergovernmental 116,615 119,529 115,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Investment income 140,567 48,380 100,000 190,000 98,000 98,000 Bond interest & other (803,582) (712,320) (685,725) (1180,000) (75'(725) (793,625) Miscellaneous (214,506) 1135 Transfers (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) Total no noperating (860,906) (643,276) (569,725) (1,070,000) (643,725) (685,625) Change in net assets 3,181,676 3,272,552 3,321824 2,688,457 2,866,855 3,028,890 January 1 net assets 45,955,790 49,137,466 52,410,016 52,410,018 55,731842 58,598,697 December 31 net assets $ 49,137,466 $ 52,410,018 $ 55,731,842 $ 55,098,475 $ 58,598,697 $ 61,627,587 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 3,181,676 $ 3,272,552 $ 3,321,824 $ 2,688,457 $ 2,866,855 $ 3,028,890 Depreciation 1,650,837 1973,971 2,226,271 1,805,000 2,365,000 2,600,000 Bonds issued - - 3,400,000 3,400,000 5,939,000 4,300,000 Bond principal (2,045,000) (2,185,000) (2,270,000) (3,230,000) (2,360,000) (2,435,000) Capital expenditures (5,388,636) (2,867,147) (9,325,000) (9,325,000) (8,262,000) (7,106,000) Otheraccruals (48,182) (78,296) - Change in cash (2,649,305) 116,080 (2,646,905) (4,661,543) 548,855 387,890 January 1 cash 13,851624 11202,319 11318,399 11318,399 8,671494 9,220,349 -December 31 c a s h_ _$ 11202,319 $ 11,316,399 $ 8,671,494 $ 6,656,856 $ 9,220,349 $ 9,608,239 While the Utility fund has been reporting a large operating income the past few years, much of the excess cash is being invested in new or rebuilt infrastructure. The City is currently preparing a rate study for the 2012 budget year and rate - setting process. In addition to rates, the utility fund's revenues are somewhat dependent on weather, especially since the City changed to usage rate tiers. The budget assumes average summer irrigation water usage. There are no major changes planned for the utility fund that will have a significant effect on the 2012 budget. -149- LIQUOR FUND CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET The City operates three Edina Liquor stores. The 50th & France store is located at 3943 W. 50`h Street. The Grandview store is located at 5013 Vernon Avenue. The Southdale store is located at 6755 York Avenue South. Stores are strategically located near supermarkets. There are 9.75 FTE employees that work for the Liquor fund. Combined, the three Edina Liquor locations generate over $1 million a year in operating income. This money is used to subsidize many of the City's public amenities by transferring cash to other City funds, including the Construction, Golf Course, Arena, and Art Center funds. Edina Liquor continues to be one of the top - performing municipal operations in Minnesota. Edina Liquor consistently ranks in the top three Minnesota municipal operations for net profit. The Southdale store is the largest grossing store for a municipal operation in Minnesota. Competition for the surrounding area continues to affect profits. Even though Edina Liquor has no geographical competition within the city limits, we are constantly in competition with stores that border our city limits. Competitors include Richfield liquor, Eden Prairie liquor, Trader Joe's, France 44 Liquor, South Lyndale Liquor, Sam's Club, Costco and Cost Plus World Market. Liquor Fund i 16,000,000 14,000,000 I 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000, 000 6,000,000 j 4,000,000 2,000,000 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Operating revenues Operating expenses 0—Fund net assets —0=-Cash balance -150- to �I CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA o e r ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues Liquor sales $12,642,630 $12,854,693 $ 13,130,218 $13,367,072 $13,328,045 $13,600,099 Total revenues 12,642,630 12,854,693 13,130,218 13,367,072 13,328,045 13,600,099 Operating expenses Cost of sales and services 9,300,699 9,467,169 9,473,649 10,103,558 9,628,249 9,836,831 Personal services 1,361,602 1,343,408 1,345,733 1,406,312 1,414,961 1,441,291 Contractual services 472,412 449,087 508,448 474,989 483,702 494,108 Commodities 62,538 75,228 63,401 64,834 64,356 65,525 Central services 186,144 191,168 206,448 206,448 212,664 215,484 Depreciation 65,799 68,583 82,535 82,340 112,599 120,460 Total expenses 11,449,194 11,594,643 11,680,214 12,338,481 11,916,531 12,173,699 Operating income 1,193,436 1,260,050 1,450,004 1,028,591 1,411,514 1,426,400 Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Miscellaneous 13,147 2,371 - - - - Transfers (1,310,100) (1,245,100) (1,255,100) (1,255,100) (1,320,100) (1,340,100) Total nonoperating (1,296,953) (1,242,729) (1,255,100) (1,255,100) (1,320,100) (1,340,100) Change in net assets (103,517) 17,321 194,904 (226,509) 91,414 86,300 January 1 net assets 2,676,195 2,572,678 2,589,999 2,589,999 2,784,903 2,876,317 December 31 net assets $ 2,572,678 $ 2,589,999 $ 2,784,903 $ 2,363,490 $ 2,876,317 $ 2,962,617 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in netassets $ (103,517) $ 17,321 $ 194,904 $ (226,509) $ 91,414 $ 86,300 Depreciation 65,799 68,583 82,535 82,340 112,599 120,460 Capital expenditures (157,853) (2,165) - (300,000) (365,000) (100,000) Other accruals 73,262 (189,962) - - - - Change in cash (122,309) (106,223) 277,439 (444,169) (160,987) 106,760 January cash 1,122,880 1,000,571 894,348 894,348 1,171,787 1,010,800 December 31 cash $ 1,000,571 $ 894,348 $ 1,171,787 $ 450,179 $ 1,010,800 $ 1,117,560 Budgeted transfers of cash out of the liquor fund for 2012 are; $765,100 to the General fund, $150,000 to the Construction fund, $100,000 to the Golf Course fund, $140,000 to the Arena fund, and $165,000 to the Art Center fund. There are no major changes planned for the liquor stores that will have a significant effect on the 2012 or 2013 budget. -151 - CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS AQUATIC CENTER The Aquatic Center fund employs 0.55 full -time employees. ANNUAL BUDGET The Edina Aquatic Center offers an Olympic -sized pool with a step -in entry, a three -meter diving board, a one -meter diving board and lap- swimming lanes. The facility also offers a waterslide tower featuring a 207 -foot body slide and 300 foot inner tube slide. Both slides empty into a separate plunge pool. Another amenity is a themed cable ride. The popular children's pool features spiral and tunnel slides, a tire swing, sprays, fountains and other water -in- motion amenities. When it's time for a break, swimmers can relax in comfortable lounge chairs underneath the large shade umbrellas or wooden trellis. A full - service concession area also offers light meals and snacks. The Edina Aquatic Center currently offers a summer season in which we open the first Saturday after Edina Public Schools' school year ends and closes the fourth Sunday in August. This allows the Edina Aquatic Center time to properly hire and train the 50 to 60 part- time seasonal employees it takes to bring the facility to life each year. Aquatic Center users continue to "shop" for the newest and most innovative recreational experience. Neighboring communities have either built new or renovated existing facilities to remain competitive. This competition combined with a poor economy and some unfavorable weather has led to a decline in revenues over the past couple of seasons. 3,000, 000 2,500, 000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000, 000 500,000 Aquatic Center Fund Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Operating revenues D Operating expenses ,4, Fund net assets -2—Cash balance -152- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Operating expenses 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Cost of sales and services Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues 261,365 270,844 297,250 302,034 319,127 325,400 Retail sales $ 4,759 $ 7,442 $ 4,800 $ 4,800 $ 4,800 $ 5,000 Concessions sales 101,398 123,879 118,000 115,000 125,000 128,000 Memberships 464,570 436,524 380,000 420,000 485,000 488,000 Admissions 261,623 334,851 320,000 250,000 280,000 284,000 Building rental 27,468 42,245 36,000 29,000 39,000 39,000 Other fees (2) 588 - - - - Total revenues 859,816 945,529 858,800 818,800 933,800 944,000 Operating expenses Cost of sales and services 28,670 35,902 32,600 37,600 38,000 39,200 Personal services 261,365 270,844 297,250 302,034 319,127 325,400 Contractual services 118,074 113,170 117,100 107,200 127,575 133,400 Commodities 142,570 115,070 83,650 76,350 84,850 111,050 Central services 25,056 22,080 23,000 23,364 18,984 19,236 Depreciation 194,928 194,701 198,000 198,000 175,000 250,000 Total expenses 770,663 751,767 751,600 744,548 763,536 878,286 Operating income (loss) 89,153 193,762 107,200 74,252 170,264 65,714 Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Bond interest & other (27,706) (17,841) (16,550) (16,550) (13,950) (11,100) Total nonoperating (27,706) (17,841) (16,550) (16,550) (13,950) (11,100) Change in net assets 61,447 175,921 90,650 57,702 156,314 54,614 January 1 net assets 2,137,921 2,199,368 2,375,289 2,375,289 2,465,939 2,622,253 December 31 net assets $2,199,368 $2,375,289 $2,465,939 $2,432,991 $2,622,253 $2,676,867 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 61,447 $ 175,921 $ 90,650 $ 57,702 $ 156,314 $ 54,614 Depreciation 194,928 194,701 198,000 198,000 175,000 250,000 Bond principal (110,000) (135,000) (125,000) (125,000) (135,000) (140,000) Capital expenditures (14,915) - (650,000) (650,000) (600,000) (50,000) Other accruals (2,995) (1,418) - - - Change in cash 128,465 234,204 (486,350) (519,298) (403,686) 114,614 January 1 cash 1,179,383 1,307,848 1,542,052 1,542,052 1,055,702 652,016 December 31 cash $1,307,848 $1,542,052 $1,055,702 $1,022,754 $ 652,016 $ 766,630 In addition to competitive factors, the aquatic center fund's revenues and expenses are somewhat dependent on weather. The budget assumes good summer weather for aquatics in 2012 and 2013. The large use of cash in 2011 -2012 shown above reflects the construction of a new amenity. Please see the CIP for a more detailed description of this planned investment. -153- GOLF COURSE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET The golf course fund is budgeted for 12 FTE employees in 2012, a decrease from the 13 employees budgeted in 2010. The golf course fund accounts for several of the City's golf operations. The Braemar golf course includes 27 holes on the regulation course as well as an adjacent driving range and 9- hole executive course. Braemar golf dome provides golfers a place to practice during the cold winter months. Fred Richards executive course is a par 29 course complete with clubhouse and putting green. The City's golf facilities remain busy despite a very competitive environment in the golf industry over the last decade. Many golf courses were constructed locally and nationally in the 1990's when projections for future golfers were incredibly high. Until 2008, the golf course fund had been primarily self- supported, although the cash position had been negative for several years prior. The City began subsidizing the golf course fund in 2008 with transfers from the liquor fund. Although somewhat improved since the transfers started, the golf course fund's cash position continues to be an issue that will require future subsidies from other City funds. Also helping the problem will be the final maturity of existing debt in early 2013. -154- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Operating expenses . 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Cost of sales and services Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,582,552 1,714,038 1,790,101 1,823,446 Liquorsales $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 133,000 $ 149,000 $ 147,000 $ 151000 Retail sales 212,886 218,585 241700 234,000 252,100 259,450 Concessions sales 230,776 213,250 1B8,000 249,000 243,800 248,000 Memberships 123,761 119,981 95,000 135,000 110,000 118,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 295,000 275,000 275,000 278,000 Building rental 81,728 70,726 82,000 91000 90,000 94,000 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 302,000 373,300 372,800 379,600 Greens fees 1,880,610 1738,261 1,562,000 1,921000 1764,000 1,818,000 Otherfees 358,333 346,971 335,800 366,000 396,000 399,000 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,234,500 3,793,300 3,650,700 3,745,050 Operating expenses . Cost of sales and services 338,248 328,821 319,600 356,300 349,400 356,800 Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,582,552 1,714,038 1,790,101 1,823,446 Contractual services 580,479 557,828 534,505 570,550 580,650 597,750 Commodities 323,311 479,783 307,150 351,200 368,100 383,900 Central services 110,796 116, 958 137,928 137,928 140,112 141840 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 414,500 427,000 404,500 404,500 Total expenses 3,542,048 3,543,558 3,296,235 3,557,016 3,632,863 3,708,236 Operating income (loss) 116,626 (1D0,354) (61,735) 236,284 17,837 36,814 Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Excess tax increments 100,124 - - - Bond interest & other (44,991) (12,793) (15,200) (15,200) (9,550) (3,100) Transfers f70,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total no noperating 225,133 86,536 84,800 84,800 90,450 96,900 Change in net assets 341759 (13,818) 23,065 321084 1D8,287 133,714. January 1 net assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341032 2,341032 2,364,097 2,472,384 December 31 net assets $ 2,354,850 $ 2,341,032 $ 2,364,097 $ 2,662,116 $ 2,472,384 $ 2,606,098 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341759 $ (13,819) $ 23,065 $ 321084 $ 108,287 $ 133,714 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 414,500 427,000 404,500 404,500 Bond principal (500,000) (280,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) (31D,000) Capital expenditures (173,180) (173,300) (270,000) (270,000) (175,000) (195,000) Other accruals 16,683 (76,897) - Change in cash 99,91B (119,938) (112,435) 198,084 52,787 33,214 January 1 cash (1086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,106,989) (1,219,424) (1,166,637) December 31 cash $ (987,051) $ (1,1D6,989) $ (1,219,424) $ (908,905) $ (1,166,637) $ (1,133,423) In addition to competitive factors, the golf course fund's revenues and expenses are somewhat dependent on weather. The budget assumes good summer weather for golf in 2012 and 2013. -155- ARENA CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Staff at Braemar Arena consists of 5 FTE employees. Braemar Arena features three indoor, regulation -size ice sheets. Braemar is available for open skating, group rental, adult and youth hockey and figure skating programs. The facility also offers group skating lessons for ages 4 through adult. Braemar Arena's principal customers continue to be Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, Edina Hockey Association, Minnesota Showcase Hockey and Edina High School. The most desirable ice time is offered to these customers. These groups represent a significant percentage of our annual revenue. The west arena, built in the 1960's, recently underwent a renovation of the original refrigeration and board systems. The City issued $2,440,000 in bonds in 2009 to pay for this project. The bonds will be repaid by the Arena fund. The arena fund has historically run an annual operating loss that is subsidized by transfers from other City funds, primarily the Liquor fund and the Construction fund. Traditionally the Liquor fund has provided cash to support operations and the Construction fund provides cash to support building improvement projects. Arena Fund 2,500,000 2,000, 000 1,500,000 1,000, 000 500,000 (500,000) Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Operating revenues Operating expenses —Fund net assets —m —Cash balance -156- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Operating expenses 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Cost of sales and services Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues 654,132 591,912 653,340 653,340 662,326 674,551 Retail sales $ 2,026 $ 2,039 $ 2,100 $ 2,100 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Concessions sales 5,692 4,953 14,000 6,000 15,000 15,000 Memberships 3,716 5,406 5,000 4,500 5,000 5,000 Admissions 111481 117,843 105,000 105,000 105,000 1D5,000 Building rental 1,157,522 1035,429 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 Rental of equipment 2,997 1,652 1,400 1,200 1,400 1,400 Class registration 8 other 130, 976 134,184 121,000 125,000 127,000 127,000 Total revenues 1,414,410 1301,506 1,348,500 1,443,800 1,355,400 1,455,400 Operating expenses Cost of sales and services 880 1,045 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Personal services 654,132 591,912 653,340 653,340 662,326 674,551 Contractual services 608,683 524,060 540,000 574,600 552,600 579,650 Commodities 73,241 75,679 76,400 85,500 87,750 87,750 Central services 41,905 41,948 42,912 42,912 42,084 42,660 Depreciation 286,241 292,892 340,000 340,000 400,000 420,000 Total expenses 1,665,082 1,527,536 1,654,152 1,697,852 1,746,260 1,806,111 Operating loss (250,672) (226,030) (305,652) (254,052) (390,860) (350,711) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Excess tax increments 100,124 - Intergovernmental - 222,000 Investment income (loss) (5,924) 10,285 Gain (loss) on assets 4,187 Bond interest 8 other (1D2) (90,892) (85,100) (85,100) (83,320) (81,320) Miscellaneous - 6,500 - - - - Transfers 102,075 196,406 365,000 365,000 405,000 255,000 Total no noperating 196,173 348,486 279,900 279,900 321,680 173,680 Change in net assets (54,499) 122,456 (25,752) 25,848 (69,180) (177,031) January 1 net assets 2,194,631 2,140,132 2,262,588 2,262,588 2,236,836 2,167,656 December 31 net assets $ 2,140,132 $ 2,262,588 $ 2,236,836 $ 2,288,436 $ 2,157,656 $ 1,990,625 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ (54,499) $ 122,456 $ (25,752) $ 25,848 $ (69,180) $ (177,031) Depreciation 286,241 292,892 340,000 340,000 400,000 420,000 Bond proceeds 2,440,000 - - - - - Bond principal (225,000) (80,000) (80,000) (100,000) (1D0,000) Capital expenditures (136,088) (2,515,947) (573,706) (285,000) (265,000) (95,000) Other accruals 8,146 166,699 - Change in cash 2,318,800 (1933,900) (339,458) 848 (34,1B0) 47,969 January 1 cash (14,870) 2,303,930 370,030 370,030 30,572 (3,608) December 31 cash $ 2,303,930 $ 370,030 $ 30,572 $ 370,878 $ (3,608) $ 44,361 The largest source of revenue for Braemar Arena is building rental, which is pretty consistent from year to year except 2010 was affected by downtime due to the west arena renovation. There are no major changes planned for Braemar Arena that will have a significant effect on the 2012 or 2013 budget. -157- ART CENTER CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET The Edina Art Center provides the community with a place to enjoy art and a chance to learn how to create it. The staff consists of 2 FTE employees, 7 part-time employees, approximately 35 instructors and more than 40 volunteers. The Art Center offers classes and workshops for all ages and abilities, beginning at birth when young children attend with their parents to the professional artist who is still learning and growing through excellent faculty members. Although the Art Center's emphasis is on fine arts, several classes in the craft area are offered, such as papermaking, jewelry, tie -dye and painting on wearable arts. Watercolor is one of the Art Center's most popular media. Classes are also offered in portraiture, realistic painting and drawing, pastels, acrylics, landscapes, life drawing, porcelain painting, oils, pottery, design, bookmaking, sculpture, mask - making, architecture and more. Memberships have steadily increased, growing from 324 memberships in 1986 to more than 1,100 in 2007. Membership now remains steady at about 1,250. The Art Center has historically run an annual operating loss that is subsidized by donations from the public and transfers from other City funds, primarily the Liquor fund and the Construction fund. Traditionally the Liquor fund has provided cash to support operations and the Construction fund provides cash to support building improvement projects. Art Center Fund 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 I 200,000 i 100,000 • ,..; ._._ Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ® Operating revenues OOperating expenses --d—Fund net assets —0—Cash balance -158- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Operating expenses Cost of sales and services 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Personal services Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues 293,356 253,025 282,000 281,750 284,500 286,750 Retail sales $ 41,883 $ 41,003 $ 45,500 $ 45,500 $ 45,500 $ 45,500 Concessions sales 444 479 500 500 500 500 Memberships 25,496 24,998 26,000 28,000 28,000 29,000 Class registration & other 400,394 361,619 367,000 404,000 396,000 401,500 Total revenues 468,217 428,099 439,000 478,000 470,000 476,500 Operating expenses Cost of sales and services 21,094 17,236 22,000 24,000 22,000 22,000 Personal services 244,329 219,647 229,998 273,882 249,614 254,198 Contractual services 293,356 253,025 282,000 281,750 284,500 286,750 Commodities 59,568 54,725 53,700 53,200 55,500 57,000 Central services 34,847 34,897 38,856 38,856 39,612 40,068 Depreciation 30,124 26,573 23,000 27,500 23,000 23,000 Total expenses 683,318 606,103 649,554 699,188 674,226 683,016 Operating loss (215,101) (178,004) (210,554) (221,188) (204,226) (206,516) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Excess tax increments 100,124 - - - - - Donations 19,302 31,701 15,000 22,000 15,000 15,000 Transfers 145,000 160,000 182,000 182,000 165,000 272,800 Total nonoperating 264,426 191,701 197,000 204,000 180,000 287,800 Change in net assets 49,325 13,697 (13,554) (17,188) (24,226) 81,284 January 1 net assets 240,848 290,173 303,870 303,870 290,316 266,090 December 31 net assets $ 290,173 $ 303,870 $ 290,316 $ 286,682 $ 266,090 $ 347,374 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 49,325 $ 13,697 $ (13,554) $ (17,188) $ (24,226) $ 81,284 Depreciation 30,124 26,573 23,000 27,500 23,000 23,000 Capital expenditures - (27,255) (22,000) (22,000) - (107,800) Other accruals 4,876 2,503 - - - - Change in cash 84,325 15,518 (12,554) (11,688) (1,226) (3,516) January cash 45,785 130,110 145,628 145,628 133,074 131,848 December 31 cash $130,110 $145,628 $133,074 $133,940 $131,848 $128,332 The largest source of revenue for the Art Center is from class registrations, and revenue can vary depending on the timing of classes held, popularity, and pricing. Expenses are also highly dependent on classes held due to instructor fees, which are paid out of the Contractual Services line item. There are no major changes planned for the Art Center that will have a significant effect on the 2012 or 2013 budget. -159- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 7.T. 01 � ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET EDINBOROUGH PARK The Edinborough Park fund employs 7 FTE employees. With more than 6,000 plants, trees and flowers, Edinborough Park is Minnesota's unique indoor public park. The completely enclosed, one -acre park featuring a junior - Olympic size swimming pool, a running track and fitness area, a huge indoor playground and a multi- purpose room and play area, all connected by meandering pathways through the densely landscaped interior. Edinborough Park presents a full schedule of free cultural arts programs in its 250 -seat, Greek -style amphitheater in the areas of music, dance, theater and visual arts. Edinborough Park continues to provide a unique recreational experience for Edina and the metropolitan area. Playpark admissions, birthday parties and season passes are the main sources of self - generated revenue. Even including association dues charged to area residents and businesses, Edinborough Park has historically run an annual operating loss. The loss has been funded through a combination of transfers from other City funds and use of the fund's existing balance. Because the fund balance will not sustain the current withdrawal rate indefinitely, the City is currently exploring our future financing options. Edinborough Fund 3,000, 000 2,500, 000 4. 2,000, 000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009* 2010* 2011* 2012 2013 Operating revenues E=— , Operating expenses :Fund net assets —Cash balance -160- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Interest income 2009' 2010• 2011* 2011* 2012 2013 Miscellaneous Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues 250,000 '62,091 235,000 235,000 220,000 215,000 Concessions sales $ 29,386 $ 29,328 $ 60,000 $ 100,000 $ 175,000 $ 185,000 ' Memberships 57,078 52,515 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 Admissions 563,735 569,591 590,000 540,000 550,000 550,000 Building rental 143,442 163,492 180,000 142,000 1150,000 150,000 Equipment rental 7,814 11397 9,000 8,500 8,500 8,500 Association fees and other 203,245 217,122 210,000 210,000 212,100 214,200 Total revenues 1,004,700 1,043,445 1,105,000 1,056,500 1151,600 1,163,700 Operating expenses (512,516) (194,949) (235,000) (235,000) (220,000) (215,000) Cost of sales and services 40,055 42,164 60,000 80,000 99,000 1D5,000 Personal services 666,921 677,701 743,011 755,611 783,21D 797,479 Contractual services 386,027 316,198 327,600 332,600 331,500 335,000 Commodities 175,145 148,342 193,200 180,700 152,200 187,700 Central services 39,573 38,495 55,632 55,632 56,424 57,096 Depreciation 98, 750 128,994 106,667 106,667 100,000 120,000 Total expenses 1,406,471 1,351,894 1,486,110 1,511,210 1,552,334 1,602,275 Operating income (loss) (401771) (308,449) (381,110) (454,710) (400,734) (438,575) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest income 37,364 73,650 49,000 49,000 42,000 33,250 Miscellaneous 1,125 - - - - - Transfers 250,000 '62,091 235,000 235,000 220,000 215,000 Total nonoperating 288,489 175,741 284,000 284,000 262,000 248,250 Change in net assets (113,282) (132,708) (97,110) (170,713) (138,734) (190,325) January 1 net assets 2,515,917 2,377,183 December 31 net assets $ $ $ 2,515,917 $ $ 2,377,183 $ 2,186,858 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ (113,282) $ (132,708) $ (97,110) $ (170,710) $ (138,734) $ (190,325) Depreciation 98, 750 128,994 106,667 106,667 100,000 120,000 Capital expenditures (512,516) (194,949) (235,000) (235,000) (220,000) (215,000) Other accruals (117,470) 29,854 Change in cash (644,512) (168,809) (225,443) (299,043) (258,734) (285,325) January 1 cash 1,205,917 947,183 December 31 cash $ $ $ 1,205,971 $ $ 947,183 $ 661,858 * Edinborough Park's finances were combined with Centennial Lakes Park in one fund through 2011 and completely separated into two funds starting in 2012. In order to show comparative historical data in this format, certain assumptions and estimates were made by the City's Finance Department for fiscal years 2009 -2011. Edinborough Park has installed a concession stand in 2011. The 2012 and 2013 revenue budget has been increased in anticipation of this change, as have cost of sales and services and personal services on the expense side. -161 - CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CENTENNIAL LAKES ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS The Centennial Lakes fund employs 5 FTE employees. ANNUAL BUDGET Centennial Lakes, a 24 -acre park and pond, offers the ultimate urban escape. The park features more than 1.5 miles of paved pathways meandering around a 10 -acre lake and interspersed with beautifully landscaped grounds, formal and informal seating areas, swinging benches and fountains. During the summer months, visitors can rent paddleboats, fish in the ponds for sunfish, bass and bullheads, watch remote control sailboat races, explore the maze, or try their luck on the bent grass putting course or croquet and lawn bowling courts. The park also hosts a variety of cultural performances in a 1,000 -seat lakeside amphitheater. At the Park Centrum building, visitors can rent banquet space for weddings, business meetings and social events. In the winter months, Centennial Lakes Park offers one of the Twin Cities' finest outdoor skating venues. Visitors can skate across 10 acres of carefully maintained ice or take a spin on one of the park's Norwegian ice sleds. Afterwards, guests can relax by one of the Centrum building's three fireplaces while sipping a cup of hot chocolate from the concession stand. Even including association dues charged to area residents and businesses, Centennial Lakes Park has historically run an annual operating loss. The loss has been funded through a combination of transfers from other City funds and use of the fund's existing balance. Because the fund balance will not sustain the current withdrawal rate indefinitely, the City is currently exploring our future financing options. .............. ........ . Centennial Lakes Fund 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400, 000 1,200,000 1,000, 000 800,000 600,000 400,000 j 200,000 11j JU Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted 2009* 2010* 2011* 2012 2013 Operating revenues Operating expenses Fund net assets — 0 Cash balance -162- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET Operating expenses 2009' 2010' 2011* 2011• 2012 2013 Cost of sales and services Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues 529,647 548,538 562,969 559,969 578,764 589,340 Concessions sales $ 30,027 $ 35,074 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 32,000 $ 34,000 Building rental 97,047 105,860 95,000 95,000 102,000 105,000 Equipment rental 95,947 118,010 90,000 81,000 102,000 109,000 Greens fees 215,710 176,124 170,000 190,000 200,000 205,000 Association fees and other 280,626 281,364 290,000 290,000 300,000 305,000 Total revenues 719,357 716,432 675,000 686,000 736,000 758,000 Operating expenses Cost of sales and services 11, 849 14,213 14,000 14,000 16,000 T7,000 Personal services 529,647 548,538 562,969 559,969 578,764 589,340 Contractual services 144,572 129, 144 134,600 125,450 138,650 140,650 Commodities 106,387 116,292 96,900 96,900 101,400 1)2,400 Central services 39,572 43,394 43,140 43,140 51,384 52,200 Depreciation 49,375 64,768 53,333 53,333 55,000 57,000 Total expenses 881,402 916,354 904,942 892,792 941198 958,590 Operating income (loss) (162,045) (199,922) (229,942) (206,792) (205,198) (200,590) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest income 37,364 73,650 49,000 49,000 42,000 38,500 Miscellaneous&donations 1,125 - - - - - Transfers - 21,280 56,000 56,000 205,000 47,000 Total no noperating 38,489 94,930 105,000 105,000 247,000 85,500 Change in net assets (123,556) (104,992) (124,942) (101,792) 41,802 (115,090) January 1 net assets 1,509,551 1,551,353 December 31 net assets $ $ $ 1,509,551 $ $ 1,551353 $ 1,436,263 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ (123,556) $ (104,992) $ (124,942) $ (101,792) $ 41,802 $ (115,090) Depreciation 49,375 64,768 53,333 53,333 55,000 57,000 Capital expenditures (70,121) (62,461) (56,000) (56,000) (205,000) (47,000) Other accruals (39,156) 9,952 Change in cash (183,458) (92,733) (127,609) (104,459) (108,198) (105,090) January 1 cash 1,205,917 1,097,719 December 31 cash $ $ $ 1,205,917 $ $ 1,097,719 $ 992,629 *Centennial Lakes Park's finances were combined with Edinborough Park in one fund through 2011 and completely separated into two funds starting in 2012. In order to show comparative historical data in this format, certain assumptions and estimates were made by the City's Finance Department for fiscal years 2009 -2011. There are no major changes planned for Centennial Lakes that will have a significant effect on the 2012 or 2013 budget. -163- This page left blank intentionally. I 1 m Central Services This page left blank intentionally. Central Services Expenditure Overview Central Services Expenditures by Function 0 2011 0 2012 [J 2013 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 I, 600,000 400,000 i — F S 200,000 -- ------ General City Hall Public Works Building Equipment Operation Central Services Expenditures by Type ,42011 ® 2012 ❑ 2013 1,800,000 1,600,000 — – i 1,400,000 1 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 – – 600,000 400,000 - -j 200,000 Personal Services Contractual Services Commodities Central Services - 167- CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 168 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550 & 1554 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES General -1550 & 1554: Personal services consist of 5 full -time employees. Central Services General include expenses which are charged back to all operating areas of the City. It includes: Liability /Property Insurance, the City's IT staff, shared hardware and software costs, telephone line costs, postage costs, and other miscellaneous costs. These costs are allocated based on departmental usage or number of employees in each department. Approximately one third of this budget is allocated to our enterprise funds and is not tax supported. Explanation of Change: • Some telephone and service contract responsibilities, along with budget dollars, were transferred from the 1550 area to the 1554 area for better accountability. • The IT budget increased by $5,000 to accommodate the website filtering /security application added in 2011. Total Central Services General Budget Changes: 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 1,673,784 $ 1,640,460 - 1.99% $ 1,654,560 0.86% Allocated to General Fund: Public Works: Administration Engineering Maintenance Police Animal Control Fire Health Inspections Parks: Administration Maintenance 23,604 64,476 93,744 377,580 4,764 162,888 16,296 54,792 2012 Distribution: Monthly $ 717 3,760 2,294 2,674 3,776 1,034 3,441 1,967 5,373 7,812 31,465 397 13,574 1,358 4,566 64,644 5,387 48,720 4,060 $ 1,123,860 $ 93,655 Allocated to other funds: Annual Mayor & Council $ 8,604 Administration 45,120 Planning 27,528 Communications 32,088 Finance 45,312 Elections 12,408 Assessing 41,292 Public Works: Administration Engineering Maintenance Police Animal Control Fire Health Inspections Parks: Administration Maintenance 23,604 64,476 93,744 377,580 4,764 162,888 16,296 54,792 2012 Distribution: Monthly $ 717 3,760 2,294 2,674 3,776 1,034 3,441 1,967 5,373 7,812 31,465 397 13,574 1,358 4,566 64,644 5,387 48,720 4,060 $ 1,123,860 $ 93,655 Allocated to other funds: Golf Fund: Golf Dome Golf Courses Arena Edinborough Park Centennial Lakes 50th Street - Liquor York - Liquor Vernon - Liquor Utilities Recycling Total 6,000 88,596 23,136 40,896 20,424 33,984 50,736 42,240 116,424 8,628 $ 516,600 $ 1,640,460 Monthly $ 567 308 2,766 116 2,462 909 500 7,383 1,928 3,408 1,702 2,832 4,228 3,520 9,702 719 $ 43,050 $ 136,705 Annual City Hall $ 6,804 Public Works Building 3,696 Equipment Operation 33,192 50th Assessment Dist. 1,392 Art Center 29,544 Aquatic Center 10,908 Golf Fund: Golf Dome Golf Courses Arena Edinborough Park Centennial Lakes 50th Street - Liquor York - Liquor Vernon - Liquor Utilities Recycling Total 6,000 88,596 23,136 40,896 20,424 33,984 50,736 42,240 116,424 8,628 $ 516,600 $ 1,640,460 Monthly $ 567 308 2,766 116 2,462 909 500 7,383 1,928 3,408 1,702 2,832 4,228 3,520 9,702 719 $ 43,050 $ 136,705 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE-169 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES I GENERAL 1550 & 1554 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED GENERAL - 1550: PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 122,147 $ 123,699 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 51,000 $ 52,020 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 26,906 14,688 22,000 22,000 18,000 18,000 6104 TRAINING 320 47 1,000 1,000 24,000 24,000 6121 PERSONNEL 26,442 32,351 55,000 55,000 33,500 33,500 6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3,486 3,407 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6155 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 45,285 44,936 46,000 46,000 47,000 48,000 6188 TELEPHONE 60,077 65,325 66,000 66,000 - - 6200 INSURANCE 414,783 390,648 550,000 550,000 500,000 500,000 6230 SERVICE CONTR. - EQUIP. 21,352 15,256 22,000 22,000 - - 6235 POSTAGE 42,810 44,220 51,000 51,000 51,000 52,000 641,461 610,878 818,000 818,000 678,500 680,500 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 46,232 55,718 54,008 54,008 55,994 57,996 6575 PRINTING 961 484 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 47,193 56,202 55,008 55,008 56,994 58,996 TOTAL GENERAL $ 810,801 $ 790,779 $ 923,008 $ 923,008 $ 786,494 $ 791,516 GENERAL IT - 1554: PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 237,628 $ 253,855 $ 436,705 $ 436,705 $ 453,895 $ 462,973 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51,062 54,763 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 6104 COMPUTER TRAINING 5,187 375 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6107 MILEAGE 3,917 1,400 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 6160 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 108,742 109,656 121,000 121,000 126,000 126,000 6188 TELEPHONE 235 - - - 60,000 60,000 6230 SERVICE CONTR. - EQUIP. 23,068 23,711 27,403 27,403 48,403 48,403 192,211 189,905 217,003 217,003 303,003 303,003 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,489 6,420 7,068 7,068 7,068 7,068 6710 COMPUTER HARDWARE 34,627 59,067 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 38,116 65,487 97,068 97,068 97,068 97,068 TOTAL GENERAL - IT $ 467,955 $ 509,247 $ 750,776 $ 750,776. $ 853,966 $ 863,044 TOTAL GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES $ 1,278,756 $ 1,300,026 $ 1,673,784 $ 1,673,784 $ 1,640,460 $ 1,654,560 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE -170 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES CITY HALL 1551 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES City Hall -1551: Personal services consist of 1 full time employee, public works help, park maintenance help, and part time help. This program provides for the operation and maintenance of the City Hall. Operating costs are allocated to departments on the basis of space occupied. Total City Hall Budget Changes: 2011 2012 $ 416,592 $ 425,640 2.17% 2012 Distribution: Allocation to Operating Departments Mayor & Council Administration Communications Planning Finance Assessing Police Health Inspections Parks Utilities Total 2013 % $ 436,140 2.47% Annual Monthly $ 18,528 $ 1,544 24,264 2,022 24,036 2,003 16,752 1,396 16,764 1,397 19,128 1,594 240,264 20,022 10,608 884 30,120 2,510 19,608 1,634 5,568 464 $ 425,640 $ 35,470 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 171 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES I CITY HALL 1551 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 86,261 $ 82,117 $ 87,856 $ 87,856 $ 81,807 $ 83,443 6011 OVERTIME 2,860 2,754 571 571 8,036 8,197 6030 PENSIONS 5,828 5,786 6,411 6,411 6,514 6,644 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 6,384 6,559 6,765 6,765 6,873 7,010 6040 FLEX PLAN 13,986 13,850 15,039 15,039 14,928 15,227 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,666 3,436 4,499 4,499 4,156 4,239 118,985 114,502 121,141 121,141 122,314 124,760 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40,045 37,693 45,000 45,000 48,000 49,000 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIR 14,587 24,868 17,000 17,000 17,500 18,000 6182 RUBBISH SERVICE 2,872 2,829 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6185 LIGHT & POWER 89,116 86,482 94,999 94,999 100,000 105,000 6186 HEAT 50,091 45,385 75,000 75,000 70,000 70,000 6189 SEWER & WATER 5,161 4,570 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 6201 LAUNDRY 3,520 2,947 6,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 205,392 204,774 246,999 246,999 249,500 256,000 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10,632 12,375 20,000 20,000 25,022 25,016 6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5,638 4,238 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 3,736 8,735 6,000 6,000 7,000 7,500 6530 REPAIR PARTS 20,016 5,925 8,000 8,000 8,000 9,000 40,022 31,273 41,000 41,000 47,022 48,516 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 7,673 6,993 7,452 7,452 6,804 6,864 TOTAL CITY HALL $ 372,072 $ 357,542 $ 416,592 $ 416,592 $ 425,640 $ 436,140 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE -172 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 1552 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Public Works Building - 1552: Personal services consist of 1 full time employee and public works help. The function of the public works building is to provide a shelter for equipment maintenance operations and provide stockroom and office facilities for public works personnel. A large part of this account is directed towards rubbish hauling, light and power, heat and fuel oil, and repair parts for the building. Total Public Works Building Budget Changes: 2011 2012 % $ 363,648 $ 363,816 0.05% 2012 Distribution: Allocation to Operating Departments Engineering Public Works - Administration Public Works - Maintenance Parks Equipment Operation Utilities Total 2013 % 368,292 1.23% Annual Monthly $ 13,896 $ 1,158 2,076 173 166,704 13,892 44,460 3,705 85,932 7,161 50,748 4,229 $ 363,816 $ 30,318 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 173 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 1552 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 79,780 $ 105,269 $ 81,359 $ 81,359 $ 82,387 $ 84,035 6011 OVERTIME - 420 3,030 3,030 3,091 3,153 6030 PENSIONS 5,170 6,971 6,118 6,118 6,197 6,321 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 6,459 8,440 6,456 6,456 6,539 6,670 6040 FLEX PLAN 7,175 9,628 14,720 14,720 14,557 14,848 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,094 3,867 5,078 5,078 4,549 4,640 101,678 134,595 116,761 116,761 117,320 119,667 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,671 7,106 6,400 6,400 4,000 4,000 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 314 1,651 - - 2,300 2,300 6182 RUBBISH SERVICE 3,238 3,472 4,900 4,900 5,000 5,000 6185 LIGHT & POWER 62,376 113,965 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 6186 HEAT & FUEL OIL 85,693 101,018 87,000 87,000 82,000 82,000 6188 TELEPHONE 4,885 1,865 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 6189 SEWER & WATER 14,536 23,434 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 172,713 252,511 174,900 174,900 174,900 174,900 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26,351 21,978 29,000 29,000 30,000 31,993 6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 21,986 9,265 20,295 20,295 20,000 20,000 6530 REPAIR PARTS 17,967 14,700 18,000 18,000 17,900 18,000 66,304 45,943 67,295 67,295 67,900 69,993 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 7,673 6,922 4,692 4,692 3,696 3,732 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING $ 348,368 $ 439,971 $ 363,648 $ 363,648 $ 363,816 $ 368,292 CITY OF EDINA FUND: FUNCTION: ANNUAL BUDGET EA: SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES Equipment Operation - 1553 & 1555: PAGE - 174 PROGRAM: 1553 Personal services consist of 6.5 full time employees, including the shop supervisor and five mechanics plus a' /2 position assigned to inventory control, as well as part-time help. This account provides for the operation and maintenance of all City vehicles. A large part of the operation costs are attributed to the purchase of fuel for City equipment. This department is responsible for the City's cars, trucks, plow trucks, pickups and vans, 140 off -road vehicles, 6 trailers, and miscellaneous equipment. Additionally, the public works shop is responsible for all maintenance of equipment and power tools. Costs of equipment operation are charged to operating departments and other funds on the basis of use. Total Equipment Operation Budget Changes: 2011 2012 % 2013 % $ 1,656,948 $ 1,675,812 1.14% $ 1,712,664 2.20% Distribution Allocated to General Fund: Allocated to other funds: Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Administration $ 1,848 $ 154 Golf Course $ 6,036 $ 503 Assessing 5,196 433 Arena 1,512 126 Public Works: York - Liquor 2,184 182 Engineering 49,104 4,092 Edinborough Park 1,680 140 Supervision 24,300 2,025 Centennial Lakes 18,768 1,564 Maintenance 623,892 51,991 Utilities 148,140 12,345 Police 394,308 32,859 Animal Control 4,188 349 Fire 159,372 13,281 Health 4,020 335 Inspections 20,952 1,746 Park Maintenance 210,312 17,526 178,320 14,860 $ 1,497,492 $ 124,791 Total $ 1,675,812 $ 139,651 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE -175 FUND: FUNCTION: AREA: PROGRAM: GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION 1553 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATED BUDGETED EQUIPMENT OPERATION - 1553: PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ 376,351 $ 376,233 $ 401,717 $ 401,717 $ 410,200 $ 418,404 6011 OVERTIME 17,755 24,197 3,636 3,636 3,709 3,783 6030 PENSIONS 26,421 27,678 29,388 29,388 30,010 30,610 6034 SOCIAL SECURITY 29,343 29,921 31,010 31,010 31,664 32,297 6040 FLEX PLAN 47,822 49,606 62,400 62,400 62,400 63,648 6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 19,158 17,569 16,428 16,428 17,082 17,424 516,850 525,204 544,579 544,579 555,065 566,166 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,162 1,735 4,400 4,400 5,000 5,000 6107 MILEAGE 1,574 12 1,600 1,600 1,500 1,500 6160 DATA PROCESSING 1,604 3,233 1,600 1,600 3,000 3,000 6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 73,883 86,015 88,000 88,000 93,000 93,000 6188 TELEPHONE 962 1,523 3,000 3,000 1,500 1,500 6201 LAUNDRY 10,222 8,972 11,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 6237 RADIO SERVICE 4,240 7,199 4,200 4,200 4,500 4,500 6238 CAR WASHES 9,095 7,286 6,000 6,000 7,300 7,300 6260 LICENSE FEES & PERMITS 8,619 7,690 20,000 20,000 12,000 12,000 111,361 123,665 139,800 139,800 139,800 139,800 COMMODITIES: 6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,436 6,857 22,000 22,000 24,000 25,000 6530 REPAIR PARTS 265,414 253,486 255,022 255,022 260,037 264,006 6556 REPLACEMENT OF TOOLS 10,367 9,466 10,500 10,500 10,000 11,000 6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 3,056 3,086 3,500 3,500 3,500 4,800 6581 GAS & FUEL OIL 302,782 443,009 367,000 367,000 365,000 375,000 6583 TIRES & TUBES 41,302 59,969 57,000 57,000 60,000 62,500 6584 LUBRICANTS 25,881 22,458 53,100 53,100 53,000 54,000 6585 ACCESSORIES 13,144 29,480 59,000 59,000 60,000 62,000 6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 2,634 2,291 3,800 3,800 3,800 5,000 671,016 830,102 830,922 830,922 839,337 863,306 CENTRAL SERVICES: 6803 GENERAL 20,810 21,895 33,168 33,168 33,192 33,468 6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 244,623 308,949 85,896 85,896 85,932 86,988 265,433 330,844 119,064 119,064 119,124 120,456 TOTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION $ 1,564,660 $ 1,809,815 $ 1,634,365 $ 1,634,365 $ 1,653,326 $ 1,689,728 PARKS & PW HELP - 1555: PERSONAL SERVICES: 6010 PAYROLL $ - $ - $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,340 BENEFITS - - 5,583 5,583 5,486 5,596 - - 22,583 22,583 22,486 22,936 TOTAL PARKS & PW HELP $ - $ - $ 22,583 $ 22,583 $ 22,486 $ 22,936 TOTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION $ 1,564,660 $ 1,809,815 $ 1,656,948 $ 1,656,948 $ 1,675,812 $ 1,712,664