Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012-07-17_COUNCIL MEETING
:1 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 17, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollca/l vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of June 19, 2012, Closed Session of June 19, 2012 And Work Session Of June 19, 2012, B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 06/21/2012, TOTAL $2,641,700.87 And Per Pre -List Dated 06/28/12 TOTAL $849,894.10 And Per Pre List Dated 07/05/12 TOTAL $570,968.79 And Per Pre List Dated 07/12/12 TOTAL $1,183,386.22 and Credit Card Transactions Dated 4/28/12 — 5/25/12 TOTAL $10,970.21 C. Resolution No. 2012 -86 Findings Of Fact Denying A Request For Vacation Of Right -Of -Way Natchez Avenue & West 415' Street D. Resolution No. 2012 -92 Authorizing Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement E. Authorization to Participate in 2013 -2014 Fuel Consortium F. Resolution No. 2012 -93 Lot Division (Lot Line Adjustment) To Shift The Existing Lot Line That Divides The Properties At 5100 Ridge Road And 5101 Green Farms Road For Margaret Scholz G. Resolution No. 2012 -96 Authorizing Staff To Apply For A Grant From The Minnesota Department Of Employment And Economic Development To Tear Down The Old Public Works Building At 5146 Eden Avenue H. Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 6, 2012 I. Engineering Services For Gallagher Drive Street Improvements J. Resolution No. 2012 -98 Adopting Findings And Decision Regarding Valley View Road And Sally Lane K. Resolution No. 2012 -99 Designating No Parking On Gallagher Drive From Parklawn Avenue To France Avenue 1 Agenda/Edina City Council July 17, 2012 Page 2 V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING —New On -sale & Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses P.F. Chang's China Bistro, 2700 Southdale Center (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING- Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding Building Height, Preliminary Rezoning From POD -1 To PUD and Preliminary Development Plan for 4005 West 651h Street and 6500 France Avenue For Mount Properties, Resolution No. 2012 -94 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment ) and Resolution No. 2012 -95 (Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan) (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING — Agreement of Understanding With Drive For The Hive, LLC L Approve Agreement with Drive For The Hive, LLC ii. Approve Facilities Use Agreement for Braemar Arena with Edina School District iii. Award construction contract for Hornets Nest Project iv. Approve commercial tenant leases for Hornets Nest v. Approve Architectural Services Agreement with SR Architects VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) 0. Tues Tues Mon Mon Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues id ed Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda /Edina City Council July 17, 2012 Page 3 A. Ordinance No. 2012 -13 Repealing Cable Television Regulator Ordinance Including Waiver of Second Reading (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) B. Ordinance No. 2012 -14 Granting A Cable Television Franchise To Comcast — Include Approval of Summary of Ordinance For Publication Including Waiver of Second Reading (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) C. Edinborough Park Study Renovations IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Jul 17 Work Session — Business Meeting/Work Plan 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Jul 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Aug 6 Joint Work Session — Heritage Pres. Brd /Rental Housing Inspct. 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Aug 14 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Aug 21 Work Session — Budget Process /Joint Meeting w Sch Board 4:00 P.M. or 4:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sept 3 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Sept 4 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sept 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sept 19 Work Session — Board & Commissions Work Plan Proposals 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sept 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 2 Work Session — CIP Workshop 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 16 Work Session — Business Meeting/Work Plan 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 19, 2012 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. Il. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.C., Residential Curbside Recycling Contract; and, IV.F. Request to Purchase, 2013 Insurance Renewal: Property, as follows: W.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of June 5, 2012 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 7, 2012, and consisting of 32 pages; General Fund $149,271.74; General Debt Service Fund $2,195.00; Working Capital Fund $170,879.33; Equipment Replacement Fund $329.83; Construction Fund $3,376.33; Art Center Fund $3,371.75; Golf Dome Fund $247.41; Aquatic Center Fund $113,951.09; Golf Course Fund $51,668.71; Ice Arena Fund $23,953.40; Edinborough Park Fund $5,295.22; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,076.17; Liquor Fund $151,372.82; Utility Fund $95,749.47; Storm Sewer Fund $20,308.74; PSTF Agency Fund $2,860.08; TOTAL $799.907.09 and for approval of payment of claims dated June 14, 2012, and consisting of 28 pages; General Fund $122,071.90; DNU Old Communications Fund $32.17; Working Capital Fund $20,547.55; Art Center Fund $7,029.25; Aquatic Center Fund $89,650.00; Golf Course Fund $28,214.30; Ice Arena Fund $15,669.00; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $6,570.59; Liquor Fund $218,807.13; Utility Fund $397,250.41; Storm Sewer Fund $1,610.57; Recycling Fund $40,048.20; PSTF Agency Fund $1,543.08; TOTAL $949.044.15. IV.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -88, appointing primary election judges. IV.E. Request to Purchase, 2013 Insurance Renewal: General Liability and Workers Compensation, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Travelers at $770,142.00. IV F Request to ft -r% ase 2013 Ins- w...•.e Reney ale PF8pe.:.• IV.G. Request to Purchase, Consultant Engineering Construction Phase Services — Tracy Avenue Reconstruction Project, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, WSB, Inc. at $120,318.00. IV.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -90, adopting the Performance Measures developed by the Council on local results and innovation and the 2012 Performance Measure Report. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.C. RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING CONTRACT— TABLED TO AUGUST 6, 2012 Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 19, 2012 a Manager Neal described the review process undertaken for consideration of a best value contract for residential curbside recycling. He recommended the Council table this item to allow time for staff to provide a side -by -side comparison of the two proposals. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, tabling curbside recycling contract discussion to August 6, 2012, Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. F. REQUEST TO PURCHASE — 2013 INSURANCE RENEWAL: PROPERTY— APPROVED Jack Carroll, agent of record, explained the process used to determine the value of City property had increased 16 %. Mr. Neal advised staff found the property values to be reasonable and the coverage to be a good value. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving request to purchase, 2013 Insurance Renewal: Property, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Travelers at $70,906.00. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V. A. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT (CAFR) FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 — RECEIVED James Eichten, CPA from Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Company, PA (MMKR) presented the Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement (CAFR) for year ended December 31, 2011, and audit results. It was noted that MMKR offered an unqualified (clean) opinion and staff had already responded to the one occurrence cited (timeliness for payment of invoices) where the City had not complied with State statutes and Federal laws. The auditors had not identified any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting. Mr. Eichten presented the management report addressing the condition of the City's finances and summarized findings that the City's financial records were in excellent condition. The Council extended its appreciation to and congratulated Manager Neal, Finance Director Wallin, Assistant Finance Director Roggeman, and staff for this positive report, noting the City's AAA bond rating had been maintained even during the recent recession. The Council asked questions of Mr. Eichten relating to the CAFR. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, receiving the Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement for year ended December 31, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vt. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — TO CONSTRUCT A NEW HOME ONE -FOOT ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING HOME AT 5537 PARK PLACE FOR KATE SCHMITT — RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -84 ADOPTED Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the proponent's request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct a new home at 5537 Park Place with the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the previous home by more than one foot. The proponent would like to raise the first floor elevation 3.75 feet above the first floor elevation of the previous home in order to reasonably protect the lower level of the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The proposed building height to the ridge line would be 30 feet, five feet lower than what the Code would allow. It was noted the proponent would like access from Park Place instead of 56`h Street. Mr. Teague advised the Planning Commission recommended approval, with conditions, on a unanimous vote. He indicated the ground water issue had been confirmed, which met Condition 2. He then displayed pictures of neighborhood homes, noting the homes varied greatly in character. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 19, 2012 Mr. Teague responded to questions of the Council and indicated the basement ceiling elevation was proposed at 8.75 feet, which was reasonable. Proponent Presentation Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, described their'study of 28 adjacent properties within Colonial Grove to determine'the :average ridge .height and assure the proposed home would fit within its character. He indicated 11 homes would have' a higher ridge height and 18 homes were within 10% of the proposed home ridge. height. Mr. Busyn reviewed" building materials and noted the eave line was positioned to not compromise'sight lines. With regard to ground water, he indicated water was found at eight feet prior to May rains so the request.was for a "lower floor elevation four feet above the water level to-allow for seasonal water flux. Kate Schmitt-, proponent; stated she grew up in Edina and hoped to receive approval to build a home that was safe�for�herfamily. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson• introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -84, approving a Conditional Use Permit at 5537 Park Place for Kate Schmitt based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit'conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The homes in the area have a variety of height, mass, and scale. 4. The proposed new home is in.character with this neighborhood. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped August 19, 2011 • Building plans and elevations date stamped May 23, 2012 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's require' ments. - - -3. - Final grading and drainage plans are subject -.to review and approval of the, City Engineer prior to issuance of,a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to.adjacent properties. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague; Swenson, Hovland Motion carried.' VI.B. "CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT —TO CONSTRUCT A NEW HOME ONE -FOOT ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING HOME AT 4805 EAST SUNNYSLOPE ROAD FOR DOUG AND ABBY POWER — RESOLUTION NM 2012785 ADOPTED Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the proponent's request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to tear down an existing house and construct a new house at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed -the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The proponent proposed to raise the first floor elevation 4.68 feet above the existing first floor elevation. Mr. Teague presented slides of the existing home, proposed home, subject site, and explained per ordinance; the basement floor must be two feet above the flood plain. The ceiling height was proposed to Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 19, 2012 be 8 -feet 10- inches, which staff found to be reasonable. He stated Condition 1 would be met since the house would be within the flood plain, causing the need to raise the first floor elevation. Mr. Teague advised of issues considered by the Planning Commission, which recommended conditional approval on a 6 -1 vote. He displayed slides of neighborhood homes, noting the variation in style. Mr. Teague explained the original proposal had been revised to reorient the side -load garage to a front -load garage. This resulted in eliminating the need for a five -foot retaining wall and created a larger side yard setback to accommodate drainage and landscaping. Mr. Teague indicated staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval subject to the plan revision to create a front -load garage as submitted tonight. The Council asked about the average ridge height in this neighborhood. Mr. Teague noted the proponent had not submitted a ridge height study but had submitted photos of neighborhood homes, noting many were built prior to ordinance adoption restricting ridge height. It was clarified that a 40 -foot ridge height was only allowed on lots over 135 75 feet in width. Proponent Presentation Doug and Abby Power, proponents, introduced themselves and indicated their family was currently renting a house in Edina, loved the area, and hoped to build a family house. Nate Wissink, Elevation Homes, presented the proposed East Coast shingle -style home with classic and timeless architecture that brought the living space into the rafter for the appearance of a story and one - half structure. He reviewed their study of 35 diverse neighborhood homes containing rolling topography, noting this site also had the challenges of Minnehaha Creek and being in the floodplain. Mr. Wissink noted this walk -out site provided a penalty when measuring average height; otherwise, it would be 35 feet. He indicated the concern of the neighbor to the northwest would be resolved by turning the garage to face the street, creating a larger transitional green buffer between the two homes and promoting greater drainage through a larger Swale. Mr. Wissink answered the Council's questions relating to drainage of stormwater. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. Public Testimony Becky Briggs, 4509 Browndale Avenue, addressed the Council. Roxane Lehmann, 4801 East Sunnyslope Road, addressed the Council. Dan Lehmann, 4801 East Sunnyslope Road, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Wissink addressed issues raised during public testimony. He displayed slides of the rear (creek side) elevation and explained how "average grade" to the ridge line was determined for this property, which was located in the flood plain. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -85, approving a Conditional Use Permit at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road for Doug and Abby Power based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The homes in the area have a variety of height, mass, and scale. 4. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 19, 2012 And subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Plans and elevations date stamped June 19, 2012. • Building plans and elevations date stamped May 14, 2012 • Building plans and elevations submitted at the Planning Commission meeting on June 13, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. The plans must include the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated June 14, 2012. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council expressed its support for the proposed home design and reorientation of the garage, noting it would fit well with the neighborhood. The proponents were encouraged to work with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to assure good stewardship of Minnehaha Creek. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.C. PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION REQUEST — PORTION OF WEST 41s' STREET AND NATCHEZ AVENUE, JENNIFER AND MATHIAS SAMUEL — DENIED Engineer Presentation Engineer Houle presented the proponent's request to vacate the unimproved public right -of -way of Natchez Avenue between Monterey Avenue and south property line of Lot 15, Block 4, Minikanda Vista Third Addition, Morningside Minnesota, and West 41St Street from Natchez Avenue to Monterey Avenue. He advised of the need to obtain rights for utilities and drainage and described the areas along West 41St Street and the northerly end of Natchez Avenue. It was noted the Comprehensive Plan does not indicate future roadways, sidewalk, or trails within the area of proposed vacation. Mr. Knutson advised the City had an easement for right -of -way and utility purposes, but does not have the fee title. Should the Council approve the vacation request, the property would revert to the holder of the fee title. The City does not have the authority to decide but, generally, the right -of -way was divided down the center and one -half would go to each side. An exception would be if the street was platted and in that case, the property would revert to the interior of the plat. Mr. Knutson advised abutting property owners could request vacation. It would require a simple majority of the Council to vacate if not more than 35% of the property frontage requested the vacation. It would require a 4/5 vote of the Council to vacate if less than 25% of the property frontage requested the vacation. The Council discussed the potential future need of the right -of -way for a pedestrian/ bicycle pathway, Safe Routes to School, or Living Streets Program, noting the Sidewalk Plan had not been updated since 1999. Mr. Houle used a slide to describe the location of the school property and ballfield. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. Proponent Presentation Mathias Samuel, 4229 Alden Drive, stated he and his wife bought the lot at 4166 Monterey Avenue and were focused on the property to the north se�ki that was overgrown and needed to be cleaned. He indicated he had been working cooperatively with the St. Louis Park School District and the general idea was to divide the right -of -way along the fence line. Mr. Samuel stated he had no interest in the right -of- way along 41" Street. Jennifer Samuel, 4229 Alden Drive, indicated the St. Louis Park School District was concerned with liability of branches that had fallen on the fence. She wanted a safe area for her children to play. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 19, 2012 Mr. Samuel advised the School District was open to replacing the fence because it had been damaged by fallen branches. He stated he would build the same house either way, but if the easement was vacated the turn in the driveway would not be as sharp to access the garage. With regard to future use, Mr. Samuel stated he would have no problem with a sidewalk but felt it was probably a low priority since the easement had remained unused since the 1950s. The Council discussed the requested vacation and asked questions of Attorney Knutson who explained the property owner had the ability to maintain (mow grass, clear trees and vegetation) easement rights -of -way and use it in any way that was not in conflict with the public easement. The property owner could request an encroachment agreement to construct something like a pool or structure. Garfield Clark, Representative of St. Louis Park School District 283, described the alignment of the easement and its condition. He indicated the School District had no objection to the vacation as long as the right -of -way was split 50%/50% between the School District and proponent. Public Testimony Lianne Byerl, 4109 Monterey Avenue, addressed the Council. Ted Johnson, 4009 Natchez Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Houle addressed questions raised during public testimony. The Council noted the purposes of the Samuels could be served by vacating only the easement abutting 4166 Monterey Avenue. Mr. Teague advised that the existing easement resulted in 4166 Monterey Avenue being considered a corner lot with greater setback requirements. Options were considered to vacate only 25 feet of the easement abutting 4166 Monterey Avenue or to move the southerly easement line north to provide the distance needed for the driveway. The Council acknowledged the requested vacation would increase property size by 25 %, thus adding value that would be recaptured from increased valuation and property tax. However, concern was expressed that it was premature to consider the requested vacation without a compelling need or first addressing potential for a pedestrian /bicycle pathway. In addition, the proponent had the ability to maintain this public right -of -way whether or not the easement was vacated. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, denying the request to vacate public rights -of -way for portions of West 4V Street and Natchez Avenue, and directing staff to prepare findings of fact for denial for consideration on July 19, 2012. Mr. Knutson advised if the vacation was denied, nothing would preclude the proponent from a future request. The Council indicated its willingness to entertain a more modest easement vacation request if tied to a specific need. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D. COCINA DEL BARRIO APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY — RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -89 ADOPTED REDUCING SUSPENSION TO ONE DAY WITH FINE UPHELD Police Chief Long reported on the violation that occurred on May 15, 2012, at Cocina Del Barrio during a liquor compliance check when a minor was served. He noted Cocina Del Barrio currently had a probationary liquor license after it failed to meet the 60% food /40% liquor sales requirement. This first Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 19, 201 violation resulted in a $500 fine. Chief Long advised of the mailed notification provided to Cocina Del Barrio that compliance checks would be conducted that included samples of drivers licenses. City ordinance indicated that a second violation within 24 months resulted in a $1,000 fine and three -day suspension of the liquor license. Cocina Del Barrio had admitted the violation and already paid the $1,000 fine. The manager and general manager also met with City staff to offer assurances that corrective action had been taken to prevent future violation. The Council asked questions of Clerk Mangen relating to punitive actions taken when violations had occurred at other business establishments. It was noted that in previous cases, both violations involved sale of liquor to a minor, not the 60% food /40% liquor sales requirement. Mr. Knutson advised the Council had the discretion to impose a fine not to exceed $2,000, suspend the license up to 60 days, or revoke the license. Or, the Council could make findings to deviate from presumptive penalty, making it more severe or less severe. Proponent Presentation Ryan Burnett, Cocina Del Barrio, apologized for the violation and stated he took full responsibility. He advised the server was terminated the day following the violation and reviewed steps taken to assure a future violation would not occur. Mr. Burnett indicated the food to alcohol sales ratio was now at 58.1% and asked the Council for leniency relating to the license suspension. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:27 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council reviewed the penalty matrix as contained in the ordinance, noting if the 60% food /40% liquor sales requirement was not met, it was considered a violation. It was acknowledged that Cocina Del Barrio was a solid operation and Mr. Burnett had been responsive and made an effort to increase food sales; however, a violation had occurred within six months so a penalty was in order. Member Bennett noted Cocina Del Barrio had received letters warning of upcoming compliance checks and examples of driver's licenses. Yet, the opportunity to refresh training had not taken place and a second violation occurred. She noted Edina had vibrant businesses that attracted people at all times of the day and evening. It was a safe community and its ordinances were designed to protect that safety. Member Bennett stated she intended to uphold the matrix and penalty recommended. The question was raised whether the 60% food /40% liquor sales requirement should be included in the penalty matrix, or the ordinance amended to incorporate a separate set of fines. The Council discussed the appeal request and ordinance language relating to conditions under which the Council could deviate from the presumptive penalty. Support was expressed to consider a $1,000 fine and one -day suspension based on the finding that the first violation had involved the 60% food /40% liquor sales requirement, not sale of liquor to a minor. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -89, Appeal Of Administrative Penalty For Selling Or Furnishing Alcohol To An Underage Person, levying a fine of $1,000 and one -day liquor license suspension, because the first violation was failure to comply with the 60% food /40% liquor sales ration and sale of alcohol to a minor. This violations would be considered a second violation for calculation of penalties. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 19, 2012 Member Bennett stated her support to uphold the penalty matrix and intention to vote against the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-87 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Je Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -87 accepting various donations. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion_ carried. VIII. B. AMENDMENT NO. I TO SOUTHDALE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT —APPROVED Mr. Neal introduced Amendment No. 1 to the Southdale Redevelopment Agreement and concern of Simon Property Group relating to its ability to appeal the market value of Southdale Center property during the term of the agreement. Mr. Neal stated further discussions were held but staff felt this material change to the agreement needed to be considered by the Council. In exchange for the City removing the bar for valuation challenges, Simon Property Group would agree to a higher baseline evaluation from January 2, 2012. Mr. Neal indicated there had been considerable discussion relating to this amendment, it was negotiated in good faith, and the proposed language was agreed to by staff and Simon Property Group. He noted at this point, time was running out due to the State - imposed deadline of June 30, 2012. Laurie Van Dalen, Southdale Center Manager, advised the draft document relating to Metro Transit had been received from the Metropolitan Council. Southdale Center had agreed, in conversation, to the changes after the April City Council meeting. The Council noted it had supported the original language to make sure the City was not in tax court with Southdale Center every year if it was giving an interest -free loan. Jay Lindgren, Dorsey & Whitney, City bond counsel, indicated he had drafted the original language that limited the ability of Southdale Center to appeal because it was the most favorable to the City and regularly agreed to in this type of agreement. Discussion ensued on the proposed language and it was noted if the property value was increased by the minimum, 2.5% per annum, the accumulative effect would increase the market value $31 million, or a 27% increase. It was also noted the increment would be used to write down the principal on the loan so if an appeal was successful, there would be less increment available for use. Mr. Neal answered questions of the Council related to the appeal process. The Council discussed the need to address pedestrian connectivity, possibly through an Urban Land Institute planning process, landscaping, and the transit station. With regard to the transit station, Mr. Lindgren explained the transit easement had to be finalized within 120 days of signing the agreement. If not agreed to, the terms of the loan would not have to go forward. Mr. Lindgren assured the Council there was sufficient time within the 120 -day process and no funds would be disbursed until that was finalized. Ms. Van Dalen stated the drawings submitted for permit included a civil package that addressed access from the street to the Mall entrance, lighted and landscaped pathways, and landscaped entrances. She Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Councilhune19..2012 noted Southdale Center had indicated the City needed to address how to get pedestrians across 66`h Street and Southdale Center would addressed pedestrian passage from that point to the entrance. Mr. Lindgren :offered revised language to address the Council's preference to indicate the Mall's market value changed from year to year. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving Amendment No. 1 to Southdale Redevelopment Agreement, revising Section 4.6 to indicate: "...Mall Property unless and only to the extent that, it is greater than such agreed -upon amount as determined annually..." . The Council acknowledged the desire of Simon Property Group for some protection from the City having complete unilateral ability to raise property values without being able to appeal for a period of nine years; however, the, proposed amendment would give the City the ability to raise the value of property" during that time period, cumulatively, by 30 %. The Council indicated its support was predicated on a satisfactory arrangement with the bus facility and it did not appreciate this matter being raised just days before the deadline. The Council confirmed it, looked forward to continued cooperation to make this' "area more pedestrian accessible including' participating in a future planning process. Member Bennett stated she remained unable to find public purpose and would not be voting to support the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO 2012 -91 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR COMPLETION OF EDINA PROMENADE PHASE WAND IV Mr. Neal presented the draft resolution to seek Business Development Capital Grant Program funds to complete Phases III and IV of the Promenade Project. He thanked Administrative Intern Klugman for bringing this matter forward. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012- 91;- authorizing Business Development Capital Projects Grant Application. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of . various correspondence. " IX. B. RECEIVE PETITION REQUESTING SIDEWALK SOUTH SIDE OF INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD — RECEIVED r Member Swenson_made_a_ motion,- seconded -by- Member-- Sprague,— receiving- the - petition - requesting_ -- sidewalk on the south side of Interlachen Boulevard: .;Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX.C. TRAILAND PARK STRUCTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY — PREPARATION AUTHORIZED Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, directing staff to prepare a feasibility study of potential trail and park facility near Lake Edina Park. The Council discussed the needs for this area and whether the feasibility study could be completed prior to review of the Park Capital Improvement Plan. The Council indicated the Park and Recreation Commission could be asked for its recommendation once the feasibility study was completed. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 19, 2012 XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received Xll. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 17, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 19, 2012, meeting available. Page 10 MINUTES OF THE CLOSED MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 19, 2012 5:05 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. in the Community Room of Edina City Hall. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff members present included Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; and Scott Neal, City Manager. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to close the meeting to confer with the City Attorney regarding a pending legal issue of trees in the City's right -of -way on Valley View Road and Sally Lane. The Council asked questions of staff regarding the status of the issue regarding the trees in the City's right - of -way on Valley View Road and Sally Lane. Staff provided answers. Attorney Knutson gave his guidance on possible methods to resolve the issue. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague directing staff to prepare .a resolution for consideration at the July 17, 2012 Council meeting directing the City Attorney to take all necessary legal steps to cause the removal of all the trees adjacent to 7025 Sally Lane and 7028 Sally Lane properties identified in the WSB report as interfering with the sight -line standard. Mayor Hovland adjourned the closed session at 5:31 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 17, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 19, 2012 5:40 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina Community Health Committee members attending were: Kumar Belani, Matt Doscotch, Chair, Mary Jo Kingston, Nancy Ottpinckaers (entered at 6:30 p.m.), and Carolyn Peterson. Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Sherry Engelmann, City Sanitarian; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; and Brian Olson, Public Works Director. Mayor Hovland noted the purpose of the work session was to discuss issues of mutual interest between the City Council and the Edina Community Health Committee. CREATION AND INCORPORATION OF HEALTH VISION FOR EDINA Chair Doscotch asked for input into a "Health Vision" for Edina. Member Brindle shared what she had drafted as an additional objective to be included in Edina's Vision 20/20. The rest of the Council encouraged the development of a health vision suggesting that some of the do.Town initiatives be incorporated. A working group was suggested as well as getting involvement from Edina School District. Mayor Hovland commented that the Committee's expanded role many involve developing a vision or an optimal profile of what a healthy community look like. Member Sprague suggested that Committee consider taking baseline measurements of health and wellness in Edina, creating a strategic plan for increasing that baseline performance, and then measuring outcomes from the plan and making the necessary adjustment to achieve that vision and goals. It was suggested that it might be necessary for twelve meetings annually to achieve such a vision. The Committee was encouraged to be proactive and creative in their thinking. CHC DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL /ESTABLISH NEW COMMITTEES — AGIN6, YgUP4. ^ "—,,ND G— SAI€R 41 14941X � The Council and Committee discussed the direction the Committee would beheading regarding the frequency of meetings (the Committee has increased to six meetings annually) and the formation of some committees. feeased en the issues of Agin-, Yewth and GeneFal Health. Issues the Committee will work on during the coming year included: resource gaps, overlap and utilization; involving more members of the community; and an active living/healthy eating community resolution., IeveFing said DO. TOWN INVOLVEMENT The Committee indicated they would be getting more involved with the ongoing initiatives of do.Town. Katie Meyer reported that a community garden had been planted at one of the elementary schools. Sarah Maaske stated she was the primary contact from Blue Cross /Blue Shield for the do.Town program. The Council stated its intention that the City make full use of available do.Town resources. WORK PLAN Minutes - Work Session /Edina City Council /June 19, 2012 The Committee noted that in additional to their normal work, they would gather all the feedback and would be looking at the broader issues of community health, including but not limited to: Edina Health Vision, do.Town initiatives, determining any gaps in health services in the community, and would be soliciting input from all stakeholders. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 17, 2012. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360363 6/2112012 100613 AAA 2,845.89 TAX - EXEMPT PLATES 290175 061212 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page- 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONSULTING INSPECTION COST OF GOODS SOLD PRINTING PRINTING CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING WM-473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION 2,845.89 360364 6/2112012 130442 ABAS, REBECCA 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6125112 290110 061412 5760.6136 150.00 360365 6/2112012 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL 1,045.24 CARPET CLEANING 290152 3927865 1551.6103 2,782.41 JUNE 2012 SERVICES 290153 3949399 1551.6103 3,827.65 360366 6/2112012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 459.42 UB TEMP 289941 35662686 5910.6103 459.42 360367 612112012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 157.20 289976 1577334 5862.5515 167.60 289977 1579163 5842.5515 149.20 289978 1578505 5842.5515 179.60 289979 1578504 .5862.5515 38.40 289980 6610686028 5862.5515 56.40 289981 1577805 5862.5515 43.60 289982 1578503 5822.5515 114.80 290384 1580119 5862.5515 906.80 360368 612112012 129469 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. 28,978.73 WATER TREATMENT PLANT #6 290291 37244817 05473.1705.21 28,978.73 360369 6/2112012 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 204.00 CARIBOU COFFEE 290040 116609 5730.5510 204.00 360370 6/2112012 102715 ALLEGRA EDINA 273.33 AQUATIC CENTER SIGNAGE 290038 93387 5310.6575 40.88 GUEST INFO CARD 290039 93499 5310.6575 314.21 360371 6/2112012 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page- 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONSULTING INSPECTION COST OF GOODS SOLD PRINTING PRINTING CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING WM-473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14,045.50 BICYCLE BLVD DESIGN 290292 53196 01238.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 14,045.50 360372 612112012 119976 AP LAWN 364.74 WEED CONTROL 00002040 290293 CTLKPK -0512 5765.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROMENADE EXPENSES 364.74 360373 612112012 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 448.34 FOOD 290041 1751214 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 411.56 FOOD 290042 .1748000 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 47.50 POTATO CHIPS 290115 1751537 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,065.46 FOOD 290116 1751074 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,972.86 360374 6/2112012 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 33.09 LMI INJECTOR 290043 38982 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 199.78 CONCRETE PATCH, CHECK VALVE 290294 39023 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 33.05 INLET NOZZLES 00007602 290295 39001 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 87.76 STENNER FEED TUBE 290296 39062 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 353.68 - 360375 6121/2012 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 279.71 COFFEE 290154 1022375 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 279.71 360376 6/2112012 120451 ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDE 7,712.45 EDINBOROUGH STUDY - FINAL 290044 #6 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 7,712.45 360377 6/2112012 120995 AVR INC. 710.72 READY MIX 00005242 290176 62471 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 571.78 290177 62994 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,255.06 290178 62887 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,049.14 290179 62821 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 6,586.70 360378 612112012 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 1,228.56 SQUAD REPAIRS 289942 3733 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,388.50 SQUAD BUILD UP 289943 3732 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 344.41 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 290297 3735 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,961.47 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 6/21/2012 - 6121/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360379 612112012 100638 BACHMAN'S 563.66 PLANT MATERIALS 00001450 290045 3866011 1644.6541 428.13 REPLACEMENT PLANTS 00001454 290046 3866111 1551.6406 334.34 PLANTS 00002032 290098 3835411 5761.6620 634.57 TREES 00006230 290298 38711/1 5422.6541 1,960.70 360380 612112012 127409 BAILEY, ANN SLYTH 126.75 ELECTION JUDGE 250047 111710 1180.6013 126.75 360381 6/2112012 100642 BANNERS TOGO 64.67 PARK SIGNS 00001462 290117 33739 1647.6103 64.67 L 360382 612112012 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 574.98 BATTERIES 00001523 289944 17266 1553.6530 23.00- CREDIT 289945 C23173 1553.6530 91.39 BATTERIES, DRILL PACK 00005337 290204 C21489 1553.6530 40.00- CREDIT 290205 C23490 1553.6530 603.37 360383 612112012 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 748.13 BOARD REPAIR 290299 00131349 5521.6180 158.43 VINYL ICE LINES 290300 00089144 5521.6406 906.56 360384 6/2112012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 877.95 289983 73842900 5842.5513 162.05 289984 73842800 5842.5512 195.58 289985 6195900 5862.5515 29.13 289986 86873800 5860.6406 569.30 289987 73843100 5862.5513 296.60 289988 73843000 5862.5512 94.09 289989 86873700 5862.5515 36.55 289990 73842700 5842.5515 41.00 289991 73842600 5842.5515 63.90 289992 86873900 5842.5515 2,366.15 360385 612112012 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 173.00 IRRIGATION SERVICE 290279 139407 7411.6136 Subledger Account Description PLANTINGS & TREES GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS PLANTINGS & TREES 6120/2012 7:46:12 Page - 3 Business Unit TREES & MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/21/2012 - 6121/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 173.00 360386 6/2112012 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING 2,000.00 WATER LINE REPAIR 00001071 290118 A85485 05525.1705.21 4,825.00 SEWER LINE REPAIR 00001071 290118 A85485 03471.1705.21 6,825.00 360387 6/2112012 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 4.00 REIMBERSEMENT 289946 060712 1130.6406 20.00 REIMBERSEMENT 289946 060712 1130.6160 35.01 REIMBERSEMENT 289946 060712 5311.6406 47.48 REIMBERSEMENT 289946 060712 1500.6103 106.49 360388 612112012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 27.07 NAME BADGE LABEL PADS 290155 WO- 776720 -1 1550.6406 86.55 LASERIINKJET 290156 WO- 777457 -1 1550.6406 24.58 NOTEBOOKS 290157 WO- 778514 -1 _ 1550.6406 109.97 BINDERS FOR PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 290206 WO- 777542 -1 1600.4390.01 35.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 290207 WO- 777319 -1 1600.6406 7.47 PENS 290301 WO- 778941 -1 1400.6513 112.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003031 290302 WO- 778940 -1 1400.6513 403.78 360389 6/2112012 104053 BIOCLEAN MOBILE WASH INC. 460.94 TRUCK DEGREASING 00001533 290119 30735 1553.6238 480.94 360390 612112012 116305 BLENKER, DEAN 61.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 289947 061112 1301.6201 61.98 360391 6/2112012 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 16,096.00 PREMIUM LOG10 -V3 5 290099 11006- JULY2012 1550.6043 155,883.50 PREMIUM LOG10 -VI 9 290100 JULY 1550.6040 171,979.50 360392 612112012 124734 BLUE EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL CO.1 34,909.95 FINAL PAYMENT 290497 062212 4402.1705.30 34,909.95 360393 6/2112012 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS Subledger Account Description CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CAR WASH LAUNDRY COBRAINSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page- 4 Business Unit RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS POOL OPERATION CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 5 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 19.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 280180 77689 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 18.34 MOUSE PADS 00001437 290303 77947 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 37.75 360394 612112012 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 75.00 GARBERG APPEAL 290120 MAY 2012 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 150.00 SELMER APPEAL 290120 MAY 2012 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 18,339.38 PROSECUTING 290120 MAY 2012 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 18,564.38 360395 6121/2012 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,823.06 CONDUIT, CONNECTORS 00001406 290208 904059583 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,823.06 360396 6/2112012 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 13.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003800 290234 80786318 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 805.11 00003800 290235 80786317 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 311.82 00003801 290236 80788806 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 995.00 00003800 290237 80791623 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,125.13 360397 6/2112012 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 694.00 289993 108284 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 227.00 289994 108283 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 921.00 360398 612112012 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 38.84 FILTER 00005196 290238 628668 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 997.57 SPRING ASSEMBLY, BOLTS 00005223 290239 638270 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,107.79 RADIATOR 00005224 290240 638297 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 361.37 FILTERS, BRAKE CHAMBERS 00005221 290241 638102 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 227.12 EVAPORATOR 00005227 290242 639506 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.36 ALUMINUM 00005181 290243 640195 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.04 ACCUMULATOR 00005227 290244 639679 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 181.14 DOOR, SHAFT, MOTOR ASSEMBLY 00005184 290245 641349 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.66 FILTERS 00005352 290246 642068 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.68- CREDIT 00005078 290247 614500CR 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.13- CREDIT 00005034 290248 623988CR 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.13- CREDIT 00005168 290249 631811 C 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 495.62- CREDIT 00005034 290250 624004CR 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,410.33 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 6/21/2012 — 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360399 6/2112012 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 2,000.00 SOIL BORINGS FOR SPORTS DOME 290047 351856 1500.6103 1,736.50 MATERIALS TESTING 290181 351631 01386.1705.21 1,147.25 MATERIALS TESTING 290182 351630 01388.1705.21 4,883.75 360400 612112012 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/26112 290111 061412 5760.6136 200.00 360401 612112012 122074 BUIE, BARB 3.75 PETTY CASH 290209 061412 5760.6513 34.32 PETTY CASH 290209 061412 5761.6511 50.83 PETTY CASH 290209 061412 5761.6406 88.90 360402 6/21/2012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 290504 061912 1550.6103 30.00 360403 612112012 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 175.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/26/12 290112 061412 5760.6136 175.00 360404 612112012 103110 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY 500.00 PERMIT FOR DRILLING 290465 061512 05501.1705.21 500.00 360406 612112012 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 5,308.90 290258 109559 5842.5514 101.35 290259 109560 5842.5515 31.10 290385 109561 5822.5515 413.60 290386 109562 5822.5514 5,854.95 360406 6/2112012 100677 CARGILL INC. 9,382.47 DE -ICER 00001582 290121 2900577752 1318.6525 6,307.30 DE -ICER 00001582 290122 2900580194 1318.6525 6,093.31 DE -ICER 00001582 290123 2900579967 1318.6525 21,783.08 360407 6/2112012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 6 Business Unit CONTINGENCIES VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD RICHMOND HILLS PK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -501 RAW WATER WELLS TO WTP6 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20 /2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 7 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 472.00 289995 93469 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,162.17 290387 93526 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 456.00 290388 93539 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,090.17 360408 612112012 100681 CATCO 4.81 RIM NUTS 00005233 290210 3 -30931 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.81 360409 6/2112012 129923 CAWLEY 264.23 NAME BADGES 290158 V103492 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 264.23 360410 6/2112012 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 1.21- 290159 060112 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 12.82 290159 060112 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 20.60 290159 060112 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 34.75 290159 060112 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 39.24 290159 060112 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 45.96 290159 060112 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 47.40 290159 060112 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 89.93 290159 060112 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 156.26 290159 060112 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 160.87 290159 060112 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 312.52 290159 060112 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 325.65 290159 060112 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 360.38 290159 060112 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 498.76 290159 060112 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 592.52 290159 060112 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 1,232.48 290159 060112 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 3,550.47 290159 060112 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 7,479.40 360411 6121/2012 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 223.41 290304 2406902 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 400.42 290305 2406432 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 623.83 360412 612112012 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 139.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 290160 70313 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS - 139.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360413 6/21/2012 129696 CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 99.53 TERRA COTTA POT 00006225 290306 105726 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 99.53 360414 612112012 123898 CENTURYLINK 606.52 612 E01 -0426 289948 0426.6/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 606.52 612 E12 -6797 289949 6797 -6/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 122.05 952 926 -0419 289950 0419-0/12 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.29 651281-1355 B001311 289951 1311 -6/12 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.88 952 926 -0092 289952 0092 -6/12 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 104.93 GV911 612 E23 -0652 289953 0652 -6/12 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 151.87 952 285 -2951 290048 2951 -6/12 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.73 952 9441841 290049 1841 -6/12 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 104.92 952 835 -1161 290050 1161 -6112 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 201.28 952 835 -6661 290051 6661 -6/12 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2.032.99 360415 6121/2012 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 685.07 CLEANING SUPPLIES 290307 517085 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 685.07 360416 612112012 130440 CHRISTIANSEN, YVONNE 100.00 VOICE OVER TALENT 290052 EDINA PSA 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 360417 6121/2012 103040 CITY PAGES 291.66 NEWSPAPER AD 289954 D10054545 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 291.67 NEWSPAPER AD 289954 D10054545 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 291.67 NEWSPAPER AD 289954 D10054545 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 875.00 360418 6/2112012 130450 CLEAN FUND 825.41 REVENUE BOND SERIES 2012A 29025_1 EEEP SPECIAL 3301.8220 INTEREST BONDS PIR DS REVENUES ASSESSMENT 825.41 360419 6/2112012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 220.40 289996 0158029909 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 188.00 290389 0198039517 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 408.40 360420 6/2112012 11011119 COCKRIEL, VICE CITY OF EDINA 6/2012012 7:46:12 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 44.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 290466 061512 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 44.40 360421 612112012 120433 COMCAST 90.44 8772 10 614 0220686 290053 220666 -6/12 5720.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4.52 8772 10 614 0023973 290161 23973 -6/12 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 13.55 8772 10 614 0373022 290162 373022 -5/12 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.16 8772 10 614 0419858 290308 419858 -6/12 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 152.67 360422 6/2112012 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 5,683.13 ASPHALT 00001534 290183 053112 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 34,326.23 ASPHALT 00001534 290183 053112 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 40,009.36 360423 6/2112012 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 36.45 WAX RESIST 00009049 290309 INV000069326 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 36.45 360424 6/2112012 101915 COUNTRY FLAGS 42.75 FLAG POLE BALL 290163 5894 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 257.57 USA FLAGS 00003804 290255 5941 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300.32 360425 6/2112012 119899 CREEKSIDE SOILS 1,314.56 MULCH 00001432 290124 89990 -29639 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,683.28 MULCH 00001452 290310 90230 -29673 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,997.84 360426 612112012 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 122.48 114 - 09855685-4 WATER 290280 053112 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 122.48 360427 6/2112012 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 8,550.50 ARCHITECTIENGINEERING FEES 290211 37806 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 8,550.50 360428 6121/2012 104020 DALCO 262.91 GLASS CLEANER, DEGREASER 00005326 289955 2470803 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 276.29 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001385 290125 2471383 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 563.12 SQUEEGEES, BRUSHES 00005321 290184 2473256 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,102.32 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/2112012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360429 6/2112012 102285 DAVANNIS 39.98 FOOD 290311 212519 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page- 10 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 39.98 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 360430 612112012 VERNON SELLING 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,197.95 290260 654753 5842.5514 90.10 290261 654754 5842.5515 44.80 290262 654752 5822.5515 935.10 290263 654751 5822.5514 1,891.65 290390 654750 5862.5514 6,159.60 360431 6/2112012 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 60.25 HOSE, SLEEVES 00005336 290185 1- 072126 1553.6530 60.25 360432 612112012 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 53.45 BOUNCE LIGHT, CLIP KITS 00005228 290186 699152 1553.6556 53.45 360433 6/2112012 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 117.67 BAKERY 290126 414677 5421.5510 74.58 290127 415174 5421.5510 55.13 290212 415244 5421.5510 43.96 290312 415335 5421.5510 93.07 290313 415405 5421.5510 384.41 360434 612112012 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 8, INDUSTRY 7,381.27 MAY 2012 SURCHARGE. 290252 14288053060 1495.4380 7,381.27 360435 612112012 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 36.00 K -9 BADGES AND LOGOS 289956 7633 1400.6203 36.00 360436 6/2112012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 171.98 651972955 290054 651972955 -5/12 5710.6122 171.98 360437 6/2112012 123162 DISH NETWORK 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page- 10 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODStOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2012012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 11 6/21/2012 — 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 52.39 8255 7070 8142 2839 290281 060412 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 52.39 360438 6/21/2012 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 438.43 AQUATIC CENTER POSTCARDS 290314 4828 -01 5310.6235 POSTAGE POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,022.76 2ND POSTCARD MAILING 290315 4829 -01 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,461.19 360439 6/2112012 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 144.00 CARMEL CORN 290055 1543 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 144.00 360440 6/21/2012 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 144.82 MAY 2012 WASHES 289957 5085 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 144.82 360441 6/2112012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 60.00 EMERGING LEADERS MEETING 290056 31958 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 60.00 360442 6121/2012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 450.00 ANNUAL MEETING 290316 31863 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 450.00 360443 612112012 100049 EHLERS 97.50 SOUTHDALE REMODEL 290128 344670 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 97.50 360444 6/21/2012 100747 ELSMORE AQUATIC 2,022.50 LIFEGUARD SWIMSUITS 290317 56437 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 2,022.50 360445 612112012 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 315.00 290391 W- 564976 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 315.00 360446 612112012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 28.81 OIL 00005237 289958 69- 068011 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 82.83 WINDSHIELD WASH 00005126 290467 1- 3882022 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 111.64 360447 6/2112012 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page- 12 6/2112012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 669.39 FOOD 290318 1301905 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 669.39 360449 6/2112012 130136 FADS, SUSAN 87.58 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 290468 061812 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 87.58 360449 6121/2012 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 290187 24366 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 360450 6/21/2012 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 134.09 WINDOW WASHING 00005342 290469 31556899 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 134.09 360451 612112012 104270 FLARE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONI 2,762.00 A/C UNIT, INSTALLATION 00001101 290319 0021422 -IN 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,762.00 360452 6/2112012 129884 FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE C 1,866.99 STD INSURANCE 290101 JULY2012 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,866.99 360453 612112012 117674 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 485.06 UNIFORM CITATIONS - BAL DUE 290104 201240 -2 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 485.06 360454 6/2112012 124520 FRESHWATER HARVESTING INC. 5,054.00 WEED HARVESTING 00001907 290129 20121 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 5,054.00 360455 6/2112012 100764 G & K SERVICES 6.44 290057 053112 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 74.15 290057 053112 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 103.36 290057 053112 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 105.52 290057 053112 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 130.50 290057 053112 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 248.50 290057 053112 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 337.25 290057 053112 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 18.50 SHOP TOWELS 290320 1006758600 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 18.50 SHOP TOWELS 290321 1006780547 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,042.72 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2012012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/21/2012 - 6121/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360456 612112012 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 75.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00007119 290322 5388868 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 497.33 CONVECTION OVEN REPAIRS 00007119 290323 5388866 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 510.65 REPAIRS TO POPCORN MACHINE 00007119 290324 5388865 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,082.98 360467 612112012, 103185 GERTENS 80.68 PLANTING MATERIALS 00001431 289959 253788 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 90.31 FLOWERS 00002157 290058 254180 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 170.99 360458 6/2112012 127516 GILGENBACH, JORDAN 204.24 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 290059 061212 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 204.24 360459 6/2112012 101103 GRAINGER 15.61 GLOVES, PAINT 00005325 290213 9844724758 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.00 GLOVES, PAINT 00005325 290213 9844724758 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 18.06 WORKSHOP SUPPLIES 290282 9846583798 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 49.67 360460 6/21/2012 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 115.00 289997 00028626 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 115.00 360461 6/2112012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,017.00 290392 140560 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,543.75 290393 140559 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,560.75 360462 612112012 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 474.20 AIR POWER GUN, CAP, SEALANT 00001518 290325 960733314 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 474.20 360463 6/2112012 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 241.62 REPAIR PARTS 00001394 290130 BLM0148500 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 193.91 REPAIR PARTS 00001393 290131 BLM0148468 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 435.53 360464 6/2112012 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 36.23 RAPID PATCH, MIGHTY BOND 290105 053112 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20 /2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/2112012 — 6/2112012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 73.67 SOD, BLACK DIRT 290105 053112 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 82.61 SOD, BLACK DIRT 290105 053112 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 138.22 SOIL, FLOWERS 290105 053112 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 152.83 SOD, BLACK DIRT 290105 053112 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 221.91 SOD, BLACK DIRT 290105 053112 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 225.29 SOD, BLACK DIRT 290105 053112 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 930.76 360465 612112012 102210 HAGE CONCRETE WORKS 1,650.00 DRIVEWAY REPAIR 00001405 290188 00001535 01387.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD 1,650.00 360466 612112012 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 5,344.55 JULY 2012 PREMIUM 290102 5924112 -5 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3.80 COBRA 290103 061212 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,348.35 360467 612112012 130451 HAVIS 199.00 TOUGHBOOK REPAIR 290256 IW46887 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 199.00 360468 6/21/2012 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,707.81 POOL CHEMICALS 290060 3344787 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,707.81 360469 6/2112012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 290132 .023930 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 360470 6121/2012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 4,234.64 MAY 2012 ROOM AND BOARD 290133 1000017408 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 4,234.64 360471 612112012 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,493.52 RADIO ADMIN FEE 290134 120538015 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 546.12 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00001539 290214 120538076 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ' 1,068.60 RADIO ADMIN FEE 290215 120538D14 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,108.24 360472 6/2112012 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 1,457.29 ADMIN REMODEL 290164 496136 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 1,457.29 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6120/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 15 6/21/2012 - 6/2112012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360473 6/2112012 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY 2,615.69 PCS FOR AQUATIC CENTER 00004333 289960 51209684 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 306.20 PRINTER 00004334 289961 51259365 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 642.16 PC 00004334 290135 51236562 421120.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT 179.55 MONITOR 00004334 290136 51223344 421120.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT 3,453.35 LAPTOPS 00004330 290216 51264093 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 7,196.95 360474 612112012 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 59.94 BOWL CLEANER 00002156 290061 600259614 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 62.42 TOWEL TURK 00002153 290062 600253918 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 127.51 BODY WASH, TOWEL TURK 00002160 290063 600263500 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 139.01 ASSURANCE, SANITIZER 00002159 290064 600261834 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 388.88 360475 6/2112012 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 73.79 PAINT, POLYURETHANE 290065 03010972 5720.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 73.79 360476 6/2112012 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 368.50 289998 604030 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,544.08 290264 604737 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 84.00 290394 604932 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,436.50 290395 604931 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,433.08 360477 612112012 102044 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 2,101.25 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 290066 011 - 059-15 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH 2,101.25 360478 6/2112012 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 916.83 POOL CHEMICALS 290067 12052916 572D.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 916.83 360479 612112012 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,422.09 CONCESSION PRODUCT 290068 177746 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 311.31 290069 18045768 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 883.24 CONCESSION PRODUCT 290326 1796452 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,616.64 360480 6/21/2012 102157 JEFF ELMS & ASSOCIATES INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 825.00 AQUATIC SAFETY AUDIT 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 825.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 360481 6/2112012 1470.6406 130444 JENSEN, DEBBIE 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 153.00 CLASS REFUND 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 153.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 360482 6121/2012 1553.6406 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 34.23 GENERAL SUPPLIES 113.51 170.21 345.95 360483 6/2112012 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 6.72 6.82 7.94 9.38 11.78 13.73 24.22 24.99 31.18 31.98 34.16 40.28 57.53 97.08 141.54 221.75 313.72 497.53 RR? 1n 360484 6/2112012 102146 JESSEN PRESS 533.31 LETTERHEAD 533.31 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 290327 20054720 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 290217 061312 290070 053112 290070 053112 290070 053112 290070 053112 290070 053112 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290283 052512 290165 32905 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1401.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 16 Business Unit POOL OPERATION ART CENTER REVENUES GRILL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CITY HALL GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE METER REPAIR R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/21/2012 - 6/2112012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360485 612112012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 344.40 41.80 3,312.90 30.00 57.05 54.00 9,271.30 116.90 13,228.35 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description 289999 1819813 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 290000 1786989 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 290001 1786990 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 290396 1819837 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 290397 1819835 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 290398 1819846 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 290399 1819844 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 290400 1819845 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 360486 6/2112012 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 85.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 290470 7405 HYDE PARK 5900.2015 DR 85.00 360487 6/2112012 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 244.77 WEED SPRAY 00001428 290328 61552866 1643.6546 298.18 PAINT 00006627 290329 61573146 5422.6406 307.80 TURF MARKING PAINT 290330 61446914 5422.6406 850.75 360489 6/2112012 762.87 108.72 83.87 491.98 199.86 155.28 275.36 111.76 434.00 .28- 105.00 210.00 35.37 3,193.63 64.24 4,402.59 1,721.50 1,863.27 2,525.02 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 290002 1314424 290003 1314426 290004 1314429 290005 1314432 290006 1315692 290007 1315693 290008 1315691 290009 1314445 290010 1314908 290011 532708 290071 1310948 290072 1315297 290401 1319756 290402 1319751 290403 1319761 290404 1319759 290405 1319760 290406 1319763 290407 1319764 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5842.5513 5822.5513 5730.5510 5320.5510 5842.5515 5842.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 CUSTOMER REFUND WEED SPRAY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL TURF CARE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 612112012 CITY OF EDINA 130449 KANDAMULU, SYAM 6/2012012 7:46:12 Council Check Register 36.00 Page - 18 290253 061412 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 36.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 222.33 290408 1319762 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,396.14 290409 1319765 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 884.98 290410 1319758 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,733.77 290411 1319757 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,112.88 290412 1319755 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 41.98 290413 1319753 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,575.29 290414 1319752 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 337.96 290415 1319750 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 332.54 290416 1319754 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 335.75 290417 1319747 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 84.68 290418 1319745 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 988.12 290419 1319748 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 35.37 290420 1319749 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 360490 612112012 130449 KANDAMULU, SYAM 36.00 PROGRAM REFUND 290253 061412 36.00 360491 . 6121/2012 105990 KELLY GREEN IRRIGATION INC. 715.40 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 290218 76656 715.40 360492 6/21/2012 101332 KOJETIN, ROBERT 91.09 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 290166 061312 91.09 360493 6/2112012 118635 KREITZER, MARK 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6128/12 290219 060712 150.00 360494 6/2112012 100824 LABRECHE 4,705.00 COMMUNICATIONS AUDIT 290073 11467 3,700.00 290074 11557 8,405.00 360495 612112012 100354 LAGUNA CLAY CO. 926.57 CLAY 00009152 290331 140851 890.57 CLAY 00009148 290332 140849 1,817.14 360496 6/21/2012 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 1600.4390.01 01367.1705.21 4105.6406 5760.6136 1500.6103 1500.6103 5120.5510 5120.5510 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CONSULTING INSPECTION BA- 367 -W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 627.25 SAND CITY OF EDINA 207299 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Council Check Register TOPDRESSING SAND 290335 207322,207324 5431.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 1,900.58 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 218.00 PLUMBING REPAIRS 290189 1594S 05523.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 156.10 LIFEGUARD HATS 218.00 REMOVE SOFTENER RESIN 290190 15955 055231705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 156.10 198.00 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 290191 1599S 05524.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 360502 6/2112012 634.00 130106 LIFELINE TRAINING LTD 360497 612112012 130445 LARSEN MANTI, ARRIE BEYOND THE CONES SEMINAR 290264 1735 7410.6216 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 38.61 TABLE LINEN 290220 061112 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.61 360503 6/2112012 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 360498 612112012 114517 LAVENDER MEDIA INC. 140.00 290421 22374 5842.5514 529.00 ADVERTISING 00009047 290333 00069460 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 529.00 360504 6/21/2012 360499 6/2112012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 662.34 GAS 388.47 DRILL BITS, FITTINGS 00005222 289962 9300876863 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 513.87 164.36 POLYMER WHEELS 00005278 289963 9300886503 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 422.51 WASHERS, NUTS, HOSE 00005230 290192 9300892991 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 975.34 555.63 GAS 00006142 290340 2055653 5424.6406 360500 6/2112012 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 1,416.94 DIESEL 00006143 290341 2060308 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 19 Business Unit VIKING HILLS VIKING HILLS VALLEY ESTATES COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 627.25 SAND 290334 207299 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,273.33 TOPDRESSING SAND 290335 207322,207324 5431.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1,900.58 360501 6/2112012 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 156.10 LIFEGUARD HATS 290336 INV090350 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 156.10 360502 6/2112012 130106 LIFELINE TRAINING LTD 3,200.00 BEYOND THE CONES SEMINAR 290264 1735 7410.6216 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 3,200.00 360503 6/2112012 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 140.00 290421 22374 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 140.00 360504 6/21/2012 101792 LOBE -TECH 662.34 GAS 00006142 290337 2060307 5431.6581 GASOLINE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 513.87 GAS 00006142 290338 2060306 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 1,068.96 GAS 00006142 290339 2055652 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 555.63 GAS 00006142 290340 2055653 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 1,416.94 DIESEL 00006143 290341 2060308 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 580.78 DIESEL 4,800.52 360505 612112012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00006143 290342 2055651 5422.6581 GASOLINE 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 20 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM POOL ADMINISTRATION FAIRVIEW FEE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE FINANCE GENERAL STORM SEWER ELECTION COMMUNICATIONS POOL OPERATION POOL ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER I CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,131.46 290012 132838 5862.5515 1,720.42 290422 133284 5842.5515 2,851.88 360506 612112012 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 600.00 290471 31513 5110.6130 600.00 290471 31513 5210.6130 600.00 290471 31513 5310.6130 700.00 290471 31513 4502.6130 850.00 290471 31513 5710.6130 850.00 290471 31513 5760.6130 2,000.00 290471 31513 1160.6130 2,500.00 290471 31513 5932.6130 8,700.00 360507 6/2112012 102237 MANGEN, DEBRA 183.39 FANS FOR POLLING PLACES 290254 061412 1180.6406 183.39 360508 6/2112012 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 240.00 HOISTING FEE 290075 170 1130.6103 240.00 360509 612112012 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 3,912.00 POS HARDWARE 00004331 289964 12974 5311.6406 9,933.13 SOFTWARE, SERVICE AGREEMENT 290076 12971 5310.6103 582.91 SOFTWARE SERVICE AGREEMENT 00007501 290343 13025 5511.6406 14,428.04 360510 6/2112012 124447 MCCULLOUGH, SCOTT 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/27/12 290113 061412 5760.6136 150.00 360511 612112012 101928 MCKENZIE, THOMAS 89.10 UNIFORM PURCHASE 290077 061212 1400.6203 89.10 360512 612112012 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 20 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM POOL ADMINISTRATION FAIRVIEW FEE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE FINANCE GENERAL STORM SEWER ELECTION COMMUNICATIONS POOL OPERATION POOL ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER I CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,702.50 SHOWBOAT TRIP 290193 061312 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,702.50 360513 612112012 103720 MEDTECH 250.75 FLOWRIDER WRISTBANDS 290078 IN000377232 5330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FLOWRIDER 250.75 360614 612112012 101483 MENARDS 16.49 DEGREASER, DRAIN CLEANER 00006012 290137 79702 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 97.80 HARDWARE, CONCRETE 00001438 290138 78022 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.45 LUMBER 00001410 290194 73468 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 14.94 ACRYLIC SHEET 00001416 290195 75211 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 147.68 360515 6/2112012 100885 METRO SALES INC 143.21 COPIER USAGE 290344 462129 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 143.21 360516 6/2112012 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 PERFORMANCE 6/13/12 290472 061512 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 360517 612112012 103008 MICKMAN BROTHERS 475.00 LANDSCAPE BASE BID 290473 LA003751 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 475.00 360518 612112012 104650 MICRO CENTER 176.28 UPS & SURGE PROTECTORS 00004338 289965 3915110 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 53.14 MOUSE FOR PW 00004337 290167 3913026 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 64.39 CAMERAS FOR AQUATIC CTR 00004337 290167 3913026 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 142.06 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00009045 290168 3914363 5125.6409 COMPUTER SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 435.87 360519 6/21/2012 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 16,468.25 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290498 062212 03470.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY ESTATES 52,122.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 290498 062212 05524.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY ESTATES 103,426.48 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290498 062212 01387.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD 186,761.45 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290498 062212 04386.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY ESTATES 358,778.68 360520 6/2112012 120926 MILBERTS LOCK & SAFE CO. LLC 569.49 SERVICE DOOR REPAIRS 289966 12 -1034 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/2112012 — 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 569.49 360521 612112012 100895 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPOR 67.23 KNIFE, SPRING, PIN 00001488 290474 13361483 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.23 360522 6/2112012 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 490.02 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001436 290345 SOI -003017 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 490.02 360523 6/2112012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,850.00 WATER LINE REPAIR 00001065 290139 34086 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,400.00 SEWER LINE REPAIR 00001065 290139 34086 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 6,250.00 360524 6/2112012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,250.00 WATER LINE REPAIR 00001066 290140 34087 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5,980.00 SEWER LINE REPAIR 00001066 290140 34087 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 8,230.00 360525 6121/2012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,250.00 WATER LINE REPAIR 00001064 290141 34088 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,250.00 SEWER LINE REPAIR 00001064 290141 34086 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5,500.00 360526 6/21/2012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 150.00 TELEVISED SEWER 290221 34083 03469.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 150.00 360527 6/2112012 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 46.96 CO2, METHAIR TANKS 290285 171041194 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 46.96 360528 6/2112012 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 35.73 RELAY FOR TNF KILNS 00009044 290169 70906 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS 35.73 360529 6/2112012 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 676.00 MN PARENT AD 290079 134272 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 676.00 360530 612112012 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 22 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS BUILDING MAINTENANCE RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK VIKING HILLS PSTF FIRE TOWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6120/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 23 6/21/2012 — 6121/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 900.96 ASPHALT EMULSION 00001535 290142 64486 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 600.64 ASPHALT EMULSION 00001535 290143 64612 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,501.60 360531 6121/2012 102677 MISTER CAR WASH 1,435.14 CAR WASH COUPONS. 00003001 289967 2956 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,435.14 360532 612112012 103246 MOIR, BILL 3,682.00 LIFEGUARD LICENSES 290346 REIMBURSE 5310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POOL ADMINISTRATION 3,682.00 360533 612112012 130456 MONTGOMERY, BRITTANY 92.00 SUMMER CLASS REFUND 290475 061312 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 92.00 360534 612112012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 158.87 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001441 289968 849026-00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 568.45 DRIVESHAFT 00006221 290347 847046-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 101.33 VALVE - SHUT -OFF, SWITCH 00006223 290348 847329 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 269.66 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001456 290349 850338 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 1,098.31 360535 612112012 110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC. 147,642.53 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 12 290499 062212 05473.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 147,642.53 360536 6/21/2012 130453 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 1,225.00 SOUTHDALE COMMERCIAL 290350 NCM178116 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,225.00 360537 6/2112012 103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER 24,666.67 2012 GMC SIERRA 00001645 290496 F32671 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 24,666.67 360538 6/21/2012 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 793.10 BIRTHDAY TABLECOVERS 290080 174196 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 793.10 360539 6/21/2012 105968 NHA HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING 1,543.56 WELL VFD REPAIR 00006488 290351 19605995 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,543.56 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6120/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360540 6/21/2012 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL 459.01 UNIFORM PURCHASE 290081 061212 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 459.01 360641 612112012 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 38.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005604 290222 NIA5527C 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.00 360542 6/2112012 130457 NORTH METRO COMPANIES 10,773.08 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 290500 062212 01355.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD 10,773.08 360543 6121/2012 129158 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC. 4,480.00 STREET RECON FINANCE STUDY 289969 2922 150D.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 4,480.00 360544 6/21/2012 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 636.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 290501 062212 01400.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GLACIER PLACE 1,138.11 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290501 062212 01402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS POLAR CIRCLE 3,419.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290501 062212 01401.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GLEASON COURT 3,783.03 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290501 062212 01403.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VERNON CT & VERNON HILLS 5,606.52 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290501 062212 01386.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD 25,643.54 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290501 062212 03469.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VIKING HILLS 78,538.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290501 062212 05523.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VIKING HILLS 145,870.79 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290501 062212 04385.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VIKING HILLS 264,636.13 360545 6/2112012 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 22.62 PAINTING PADS 00009154 290352 42354703 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 300.77 - PAPER, DRAWING PAD TAPE 00009050 290353 42449400 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 323.39 360546 612112012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 8.17 CALCULATOR 290082 611365210001 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 55.78 NAME TAGS, PADS, SCISSORS 290083 611365197001 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 162.88 THERMAL PAPER 00006034 290144 611586560001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 75.66 PENCILS, CHAIR CASTERS 00002028 290196 611905634001 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 302.49 360547 6121/2012 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 141.10 COOKIES 290084 81413623 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 6/21/2012 — 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 141.10 360548 612112012 130454 OVEN HEARTH WHOLESALE BAKERY 34.36 CONEY BUNS 290354 317094 5520.5510 34.36 360549 6/2112012 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 20,691.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 290502 060812 04387.1705.30 84,665.41 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 290502 060812 01388.1705.30 155,524.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 290502 060812 05525.1705.30 191,032.69 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 290502 060812 03471.1705.30 451,914.14 360550 6/21/2012 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 36,833.87 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 290503 062212 03468.1705.30 79,867.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290503 062212 05522.1705.30 169,572.01 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290503 062212 04384.1705.30 212,746.15 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 290503 062212 01385.1705.30 499,019.38 360551 6/2112012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,899.66 290265 8354005 -IN 5862.5513 1,827.04 290266 8353993 -IN 5842.5513 209.50 290423 8354053 -IN 5842.5512 4,936.20 360552 6/2112012 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 2,550.00 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 290085 60912005 1554.6103 2,550.00 360553 6/2112012 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 751.01 290145 75329725 5421.5510 497.50 290267 73227796 5862.5515 565.16 290355 75329652 5520.5510 653.70 290356 75329759 5320.5510 2,467.37 360554 6/2112012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 67.78 290013 2253310 5862.5513 65.12 290014 2253313 5862.5513 1,012.23 290015 2252509 5822.5513 161.89 290424 2256125 5822.5512 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 25 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL VERNON SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 26 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit 57.12 290425 2256128 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,346.16 290426 2256134 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 290427 2256129 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,318.43 290428 2256130 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,262.85 290429 2256135, 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 758.90 290430 2256136 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.48 290431 2256132 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,199.04 290432 2256137 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 229.60 290433 2256133 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,227.32 290434 2256138 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,080.47 290435 2256139 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12,792.51 360555 6/2112012 100119 PING 206.79 METAL WOODS DRIVER 290476 11283273 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 567.20 IRONS SET 290477 11300994 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 773.99 360556 612112012 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 85.60 290016 15503 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 85.60 360557 612112012 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 68.76 622833 WATER 290086 622833 -05-12 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 68.76 360558 612112012 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 17,297.80 SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM 00007000 290223 60137 5300.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 17,297.80 360559 612112012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 393.96 CUPS, LIDS 00002154 290087 5638 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 377.63 BIRTHDAY PLATES 00002150 290086 5631 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 397.71 CLEANER, GLOVES, CAN LINERS 00002155 290089 5636 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 286.43 VACUUM 00002046 290357 5637 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 572.23 TOWELS, WIPES, LINERS 00002046 290358 5634 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,027.96 360560 6/2112012 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 582.77 TIRES, ROTARY BLADES 00006229 290359 CD1570750 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 582.77 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6120/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 27 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360561 6/2112012 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 2,401.48 ICE PAINT 290360 0050093 -IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 2,401.48 360562 612112012 125936, REINDERS INC. 376.04 FUNGICIDE 00006220 290361. 3015142 -00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,603.91 FUNGICIDE 00006220 290362 3015089 -00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,979.95 360563 6/2112012 130447 RODIONOV, ANDREJ 189.72 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 290224 5040 60TH ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 189.72 360564 612112012 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 401.87 PARTS WASHER SERVICE 290363 57964050 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 401.87 360565 6/2112012 117807 SAM'S CLUB 31.48 REFRESHMENTS FOR COURSE 290286 060212 '7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 31.48 360566 612112012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 35.33 101= "" "9350 290225 061212 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 41.00 101 "" "'9350 290225 061212 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 64.71 101x *9350 290225 061212 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 141.04 360567 6121/2012 104788 SANDY S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 1,155.32 FLASH DRIVES 290090 SH2O25 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 1,155.32 360568 6/21/2012 130295 SEASONAL CHORES INC. 75.09 SPRINKLER REPAIR 290226 QB5477 01370.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON 75.09 360569 612112012 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 157.00 OFFICE SIGNAGE 290170 42864 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 45.00 NAME PLATE 290171 42865 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 202.00 360570 6121/2012 103249 SHANNON, JIM 140.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/10/12 290227 061112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 140.00 360571 6/2112012 101556 SHRED -IT USA INC. 45.00 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 289970 8120006625 1400.6406 5311.6406 5311.6201 1470.4329 1552.6406 1470.6215 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5512 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5440.5511 5440.5511 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY AMBULANCE FEES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page- 28 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 45.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 360572 6/2112012 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 120784 SIGN PRO COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 455.82 LOGO CLINGS FOR RECEPTICLES 290091 5644 YORK SELLING 455.82 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 360573 6/2112012 YORK SELLING 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 29.50 UNIFORM SWEATSHIRT 290364 464354 29.50 360574 612112012 130446 SILVESTRI, GREGORY 1,094.40 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 290228 061412 1,094.40 360575 6/2112012 105664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 174.28 TIME CLOCK 00001223 290197 67834140 484.88 ALARM MONITORING 290257 75242864 659.16 360576 6/2112012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 356.00 290017 1780031 1,684.00 290268 1827617 3,566.83 290269 1776555 1,193.43 290270 1806932 707.12 290271 1806905 .10 290272 1806908 766.43 290436 1806958 73.00 290437 1787612 5,127.14 290438 1806959 290.00 290439 1787607 5,228.42 290440 1776549 1,965.38 290441 1806957 33.74- 290442 1806956 20,924.11 360577 6/2112012 130091 SPARTINA 449 LLC 181.94 MERCHANDISE 290478 4106941 95.00 MERCHANDISE 290479 4102171 -1 5311.6406 5311.6201 1470.4329 1552.6406 1470.6215 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5512 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5440.5511 5440.5511 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY AMBULANCE FEES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page- 28 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 75.00 CITY OF EDINA 061412 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Council Check Register 75.00 6/21/2012 - 6121/2012 612112012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 79.96 276.94 582 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 360578 6/2112012 22.99 123788 SPECIALTY TURF & AG INC 583 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 154.97 TAZO 290365 132821 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 154.97 6/2112012 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 360579 6/2112012 106015 SPORT SYSTEMS UNLIMITED CORP. 241.61 DOOR PARTS 00001374 290369 902062741 1646.6530 364.74 POLYCARB - DIVING BOARD 00007124 290366 0035269 -IN 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 364.74 360584 6/21/2012 360580 6121/2012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 355.67 39.47 PLUMBING PARTS 00001435 290367 S2558067.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 57.76 PLUMBING PARTS 00001443 290368 S2558778.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 360585 97.23 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 360581 6/2112012 103658 ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/28112 290114 061412 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 29 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6124112 290109 061412 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 75.00 360582 612112012 129745 ST LOUIS PARK DO GRILL AND CHI 79.96 BIRTHDAY CAKES 290092 582 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 22.99 290093 583 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 102.95 360583 6/2112012 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 241.61 DOOR PARTS 00001374 290369 902062741 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 241.61 360584 6/21/2012 117685 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 355.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 290172 113701983 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 355.67 360585 612112012 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/28112 290114 061412 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 360586 6/2112012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 671.88 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005338 290198 611636 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 671.88 360587 612112012 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 127.60 MERCHANDISE 290480 625608 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 30 Business Unit 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 127.60 290018 RT01- 000023 360588 6/2112012 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 116.90 PUBLISH ORD 2012 -12 290106 1382228 44.96 PUBLISH NOTICE 290107 1382227 SURVEY PHONE 290199 161.86 1260.6188 360589 612112012 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 360593 612112012 42.73 380007460384 LISTING 289971 060412 42.73 380007460384 LISTING 289971 060412 5440.5511 42.74 380007460384 LISTING 289971 060412 18161304 5440.5511 128.20 111.72 360590 612112012 5440.5511 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 125.95 290484 7,027.57 FUNGICIDE, INSECTICIDE 00006128 290370 6043 156.41 7,027.57 18003291 5440.5511 360591 6/2112012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 18181350 5440.5511 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page - 30 Business Unit 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP ENGINEERING GENERAL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,302.00 290018 RT01- 000023 5862.5514 1,302.00 360592 612112012 120595 T- MOBILE 85.28 SURVEY PHONE 290199 477067848 1260.6188 85.28 360593 612112012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 163.86 MERCHANDISE 290481 18173584 5440.5511 204.82 290482 18161304 5440.5511 111.72 290483 18161305 5440.5511 125.95 290484 18161306 5440.5511 156.41 290485 18003291 5440.5511 86.24 290486 18181350 5440.5511 111.72 290487 18185414 5440.5511 52.14 290488 18076910 5440.5511 1,012.86 360594 6/2112012 121253 THAYER, LARRY 108.23 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 290489 061512 1652.6107 108.23 360595 6/2112012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 874.00 290146 00773219 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP ENGINEERING GENERAL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 31 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7,422.79 290443 695512 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8,296.79 360596 6/21/2012 114354 TILSNER CARTON CO. 1,152.76 TARGET BACKSTOPS 290287 490014 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 1,152.78 360597 612112012 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 157.50 BOARD MEETING MINUTES 5124/12 290173 19111 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 157.50 360598 6/2112012 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 62.31 SWITCH 00005182 289972 9006484 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.55 TERMINALS, TOOLS 00005201 290200 9CO5996 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 89.86 360599 6/21/2012 101474 TITLEIST 625.00 FITTING CART 290229 0674355 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 143.35 GOLF BALLS 290490 0689486 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 273.25 DRIVER 290491 0679218 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 456.35 GOLF BALLS 290492 0661794 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,497.95 360600 6/2112012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 283.22 TANK LEASE RENEWAL 290371 724087 5422.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 283.22 360601 6121/2012 124763 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 391.97 COPIER USAGE 290288 205121676 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 391.97 360602 612112012 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 12.40 BACKGROUND CHECKS 290094 05220322 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.40 360603 6/2112012 101042 TRIARCO 70.54 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 00007116 290095 913830 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 176.90 BUTTON PARTS 00009051 290372 914183 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 103.38 BRUSHES, GLUE 00009048 290373 910358 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 350.82 360604 6/2112012 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12• Council Check Register Page - 32 6/2112012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 144.29 WEED CONTROL 00001467 290374 122769 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 144.29 360605 6/21/2012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 83.18 MOWER PARTS 00001439 290375 JI62238 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 83.18 360606 6/2112012 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 270.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 290230 101926238 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 270.00 360607 6/2112012 125032 UNI.SELECT USA 988.57 PARTS 290147 053112 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 988.57 360608 6121/2012 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1,698.01 MAY 2012 UNIFORMS 289973 053112 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,698.01 360609 6/21/2012 102212 UPBEAT INC 9,064.15 RECYCLING CONTAINERS 00001253 290108 511752 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 9,064.15 360610 6/2112012 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.27 PAGER 290174 V6096083F 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 183.00 PAGERS 290376 V0319246F 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 196.27 360611 6/2112012 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 72.75 CUPS 290148 236132 -02 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 72.75 CUPS 290149 237848 -01 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 412.33 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 00001442 290377 238748 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 742.61 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 290378 238752 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 9.36- CREDIT 290379 238946CM 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,291.08 360612 612112012 130455 VERGHESE, PRIYA 92.00 SUMMER CLASS REFUND 290493 061312 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 92.00 360613 612112012 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1,400.00 LEASE CARTS 00006016 290150 61556 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Council Check Register Page - 33 6/21/2012 - 6/2112012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 132.14 PARTS FOR BALLFIELD 00001446 290380 61519 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 330.14 FILTER, CORD 00006214 290381 61451 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 851.10 BATTERIES FOR CART 00002033 290382 61475 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,713.38 360614 6/21/2012 101061 VICTORY CORPS 386.24 USA FLAGS 290289 174337 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 386.24 360615 6/2112012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 13.33 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001515 290151 6419181 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13.33 360616 6/21/2012 125327 VINOANDES 572.35 290019 WEB000626 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 572.35 360617 612112012 119454 VINOCOPIA 130.50 290444 0058281 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 108.75 290445 0058280 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 746.50 290446 0058279 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 321.48 290447 0058196 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 38.75 290448 0058197 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,345.98 360618 612112012 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 3,071.99 CONCESSION PRODUCT 290096 33890766 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 3,071.99 360619 6/21/2012 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 1,750.00 3RD QTR RETAINER 290383 212019 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 1,750.00 360620 6/2112012 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 110.71 LATCH 00005187 290201 605641 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.71 360621 612112012 118274 WEST METRO IRRIGATION INC. 110.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 290231 14791 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 110.00 360622 612112012 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2012012 7:46:12 Council Check Register -Page - 34 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 592.25 CYLINDER, KIT 00005075 290202 44473 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 592.25 360623 6/21/2012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 633.90 290449 302051 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,513.45 290450 301962 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,147.35 360624 6/21/2012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 547.09 290020 412135 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 360.00 290021 412222 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 293.04 290022 412395 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 578.72 290451 412985 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 507.64 290452 412982 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 460.03 290453 412984 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,746.52 360625 6/2112012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 994.93 290023 757148 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 49.10 290024 757149 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 128.18 290025 755445 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,852.62 290026 757147 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,261.59 290273 758587 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 242.39 290274 758586 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 172.30 290275 752687 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,202.05 290454 758585 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 327.55 290455 753782 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.89 290456 758580 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 9,798.35 290457 758581 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,953.80 290458 758579 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,132.89 290459 760409 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,214.77 290460 758582 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 172.30 290461 752685 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 172.15 - 290462 758583 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 34,706.86 360626 612112012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER .03 290027 910172 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 290028 910171 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 290029 910173 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 290030 910174 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,341.25 290031 910175 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 6/2112012 CITY OF EDINA 130452 WRIGHT, MIKE LIGHT & POWER Council Check Register LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 120.00 290032 910177 5662.5514 43.20 290033 910176 5862.5515 43.00 290034 910544 5862.5515 1,927.35 290035 910543 5862.5514 21.50 290036 909885 5822.5515 1,069.06 290037 909883 5822.5514 3,591.05 290276 911138 5842.5514 360.00 290277 911140 5842.5514 21.50 290278 911139 5842.5515 610.90 290463 913273 5421.5514 5,141.48 290464 913498 5842.5514 360627 6/2112012 LIGHT & POWER 130452 WRIGHT, MIKE LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 20.91 LOCKS FOR LAKE CABINET 290290 061412 20.91 360628 6/21/2012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 259.56 51- 4197645 -8 289974 327945243 4,203.20 51- 5868961 -7 289975 327785719 8,883.22 51- 6644819 -9 290097 326410664 22,796.75 51- 5605640 -1 290494 328505664 6,821.88 51- 6955679 -8 290495 328862714 42,964.61 360629 6/21/2012 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 19,420.05 UNLEADED FUEL 00005975 290203 494545 19,420.05 360630 6/21/2012 130443 ZHAO, HENRY 114.00 CLASS REFUND 290232 061312 114.00 360631 6/2112012 101091 ZIEGLER INC 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 290233 E6395939 450.00 2,641,700.87 Grand Total 4086.6103 1322.6185 1375.6185 5720.6185 5911.6185 1551.6185 1553.6581 5101.4607 1551.6180 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6/20/2012 7:46:12 Page- 35 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CLASS REGISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 2,641,700.87 Total Payments 2,641,700.87 ART CENTER REVENUES CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/20/2012 7:47:16 Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/21/2012 - 6/21/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 388,014.22 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 104.93 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 825.41 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 485,872.18 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 6,663.56 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,644.28 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 598.79 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 55,585.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 32,932.72 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 8,994.77 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 24,403.26 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,926.22 05800 LIQUOR FUND 182,352.57 05900 UTILITY FUND 897,826.86 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 537,036.19 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,575.36 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,344.55 Report Totals 2,641,700.87 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pplipies 9nd ,.1 r 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 1 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL (BILLING) 86.80 CITY OF EDINA 290582 R55CKREG LOG20000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4.00- Council Check Register 6610714026 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation,' PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360632 6/28/2012 50TH ST SELLING 103173 .ACCOUNTEMPS 130.00 763.23 UB TEMP 290505 35694577 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON SELLING 810.36 UB TEMP 290912. 35732257 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 290865 1,573.59 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 360633 612812012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 290866 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 1 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL (BILLING) 86.80 290582 1574139 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4.00- 290583 6610714026 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 80.40 290749 1583157 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 130.00 290750 1583156 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.20 290865 1583161 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 95.60 290866 1574140 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19.60 290986 1583889 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 97.20 290987 1563891 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 582.80 360634 612812012 106476 ACE TRAILER SALES 300.00 SHORING TRAILER REPAIR 290913 27690 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 360635 6/2812012 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 224.13 SCOREBOARD REPAIRS 00001421 290506 35441 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 224.13 360636 612812012 102715 ALLEGRA EDINA 438.01 CAFR PRINTING 290507 93614 1160.6575 PRINTING FINANCE 438.01 360637 612812012 103285 AMEM 100.00 2012 DUES 290720 2012 -01253 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 360638 612812012 100628 AMMONIA HOUSE, THE 234.24 PAINT 00008055 290914 42648 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT J 234.24 360639 6/28/2012 100665 AMSAN 180.04 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001460 290806 267866952 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 180.04 360640 6/2812012 101601 - AMUNDSON, ERIK 400.00 TRAINING CERTIFICATION 290508 061812 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/28/2012 — 6/2812012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419.75 UNIFORM PURCHASE 290509 061412 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 619.75 360641 612812012 130460 ANDERSON, GARY 1,282.86 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 290684 061912 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,282.86 360642 612812012 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 1,476.73 FOOD 290510 1754332 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 68.49 FOOD 290807 1754542 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 437.56 FOOD 290808 1755532 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,982.78 360643 612812012 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 61.32 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00001493 290511 47743 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 61.32 360644 6128/2012 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 9,365.00 DUMPSTER AREA CONSTRUCTION 00007109 290650. 39000; 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 2,704.00 INSTALL RETAINING WALL 290651 39110 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 59.81 LMI INJECTORS 290652 39037 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 258.96 SODIUM BICARBONATE 290809 39073 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 617.55 MURIATIC ACID, CAL HYPO 290810 39100 _ 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 13,005.32 360645 6/2812012 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 441.21 COFFEE 290512 1023829 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 441.21 360646 612812012 130470 ART DISTRICT CHIROPRACTIC 2,978.00 BACK WELLNESS TRAINING 290959 2012 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,978.00 360647 6128/2012 129495 ASPHALT DRIVEWAY COMPANY 5,000.00 REPLACE DRIVEWAY 00001627 .290721' ° 1627 - 01373.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS RECON 5,000.00 360648 612812012 100256 AT&T MOBILITY 25.96 [PAD DATA SERVICE 290915 287240706569X06 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 1712 25.96 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR 6/28/2012 - 6128/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360649 6128/2012 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100642 BANNERS TO GO COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 323.33 PARK SIGNS 00001461 290811 34175 1647:6406 323.33 360650 612812012 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 33.83 BATTERY 00005351 290960 17430 1553.6530 33.83 360651 612812012 127908 BAZZJL:LIONS, THE 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/5112 290957 062512 5760.6136 200.00 360652 6/28/2012 101355 BELLBOYCORPORAT10N 1.171.30 290584 73949800 5842.5512 258.81 290585 86909700 5842.5515 518.39 290586 6199100 5862.5515 190.97 290587 86907500 5862.5515 271.85 290751 73942500 5862.5512 37.90 290752 73664900 5862.5515 329.10 290752 73664900 5862.5512 505.10 290753 73664800 5862.5512 97.07 290988 86942500 5862.5515 114.10 290989 74044400 5862.5515 42.38 290990 86942600 5822.5515 73.10 290991 74044500 5822.5515 54.15 290992 74044600 5822.5512 374.10 290993 74045000 5842.5512 125.53 290994 86942700 5842.5515 36.55 290995 74044800 5842.5515 826.85 290996 74044700 5842.5513 5,027.25 360653 6128/2012 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY ' 188.00 COFFEE 290916 1024059 5520.5510 188.00 360654 6/2812012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 19.22 STEP FILES 290513 WO- 779384-1 1550.6406 248.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 290514 WO- 779232 -1 1550.6406 33.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 290515 WO- 779730 -1 1600.6406 58.20 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 290516 WO- 779374 -1 1600.4390.01 359.06 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/2712012 8:21:55 Page - 3 Business Unit PATHS & HARD SURFACE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD,MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA' CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 290867 108457 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 457.00 290997 108456 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 129.50 290998 108497 6/28/2012 -6/2812012 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360655 612812012 104465 BEST WESTERN KELLY INN 061912 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.29 951.83 BCA CONFERENCE 290812 LODGING 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.00 951.83 290685 061912 5410.6104 360656 6128/2012 119153 BLACKBURN MFG. CO. 061912 5410.6235 POSTAGE 45.00 159.48 MARKING FLAGS 00001414 290517 0417773 -IN 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 194.59 159.48 360657 6128/2012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 105.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 426.20 MOTOR STARTER, AUTO SWITCH 00001536 290813 904133978 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 105.00 426.20 360658 612812012 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 4 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL POOL OPERATION 372.50 290867 108457 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 457.00 290997 108456 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 129.50 290998 108497 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 153.50 290999 108458 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,112.50 360659 612812012 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 4.51 290685 061912 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.92 290685 061912 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.87 290685 061912 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.29 290685 061912 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.00 290685 061912 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 45.00 290685 061912 5410.6235 POSTAGE 45.00 290685 061912 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 194.59 360660 6128/2012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 105.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 290961 062512 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105.00 360661 612812012 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF GRILL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF CARS GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 772.23 MERCHANDISE 290686 923607900 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 526.79 290687 923607989 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,521.54 290688 923606203 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 360662 6/28/2012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 16.75 290754 113513 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21:55 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 5 ' 6/28/2412 - 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 692.80 290755 113514 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,398.85 290756 113515 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 60.50 290757 113516 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,168.90 360663 612812012 103268 CARLSON,,DAVID . i 229.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 290653 061912 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 229.96 360664 6128/2012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 116.00 280588 93538 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 374.34 290758 93614 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.17 290868 93615 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 579.51 360665 6/28/2012 129923 CAWLEY 64.75 NAME BADGES 290518 V104417 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 19.21 NAME BADGES 290519 V104416 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 83.96 360666 612812012 102372 .CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 206.72 LCD MONITORS 00004341 290817 L874424 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 206.72 LCD MONITORS 00004341 290817 L374424 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 413.44 360667 6/28/2012 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 47.85 5590919-6 290917 5590919-6/12 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 12.82 5584310 -6 290918 5584310 -6/12 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 229.63 5584304 -9 290919 5584304 -6/12 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 190.57 8034001 -1 290962 8034001 -6/12 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 480.87 360668 612812012 123898 CENTURYLINK 58.80 952 944 -6522 290520 6522 -6/12 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 58.80 360669 6/2812012 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 212.95 290759 475532 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 65.50 290760 474888 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 278.45 360670 612812012 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 5,744.33 LAB SERVICES 00001491 290521 060712 5915.6136 5,744.33 360671 612812012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 80.09 00102561- 0112920000 290522 112920000 -6/12 5841.6189 49.28 00110793 - 0155250009 290689 155250009 -6/12 5422.6189 7,809.50 00110793 - 0155200000 290690 155200000 -0 /12 5420.6189 49.28 0 173 001001-01730 01001 290691 173001001 -6/12 5210.6189 49.28 00110793 - 0173001000 290692 173001000=6/12 5424.6189 93.35 00110793 - 0155250018 290693 155250018-0/12 5422.6189 1,913.31 00077479 -0113317143 290818 113317143 -6/12 5720.6189 326.84 0 1553 00018-015 53 00018 290920 155300018 -6/12 5511.6189 49.28 00079303-0155300009 290921 155300009 -6/12 5511.6189 878.13 00103650- 0155251008 290922' 155251008 -6/12 7411.6189 561.67 00103650- 0155251026 290923 155251026 -6/12 7411.6189 1,901.66 00103650-0155252016 290924 155252016 -6/12 7411.6189 208.29 00113607- 0170005201 290925 170005201 - 6/12-.. - 1470.6189 13,969.96 360672 612812012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 211.20 290589 0168020813 5822.5515 211.20 360673 6/28/2012 120433 COMCAST 106.95 8772 10 614 0396908 290926 0396908 -6/12 5760.6105 106.95 360674 612812012 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 616.94 MORTAR 60001517 290722 0080480 -IN 1314.6406 204.24 CONCRETE, UNSEAL 00001517 290723 0080479 -IN 1314.6406 224.26 MORTAR, SLEDGEHAMMER HANDL0001425 290724 0080481 -IN 1314.6406 251.90. CONCRETE 00001524 280725, 0080684 -IN 1314.6406 1,297.34 360675 612812012 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 157.31 UNIFORM SHIRTS 290819 15800 5761.6201 298.30 BIRTHDAY PARTY TATTOOS 290820 15568 5720.6405 4,018.65 YOUTH T- SHIRTS 290821 15602 5720.6406 4,474.26 360676 612812012 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 24.23 114 - 10014090 -3 290823 MAY31 1460.6230 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER &.WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER,& WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER'S: WATER 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 6 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT YORK OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE GOLF DOME PROGRAM RANGE: MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET, RENOVATION STREET; RENOVATION CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger' Account Description 24.23 SINESS FORMS Business Unit 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 7 360677 612812012 130169 CUSTOM BU 290590 655419 434.96 AOUATIC CENTER POSTCARDS 290822 288026 5310:6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 434.96 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 655797 5822.5514 360678 612812012 102514 CUTTER & BUCK ' 2,737.05 509.73 592.44 MERCHANDISE 290694 92091696 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 592.44 LUMBER 509.73 360679 612812012 121384 CVS FLAGS _ COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 626.80 FLAGS FOR PARADE 290824 100876706 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES " 626.80 290590 655419 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 278.05 360680 6/2812012 - 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 655797 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,737.05 509.73 LUMBER'FOR.GAZEBO 00001376 290654 159367 1646.6577 LUMBER 509.73 655795 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 87.80 290870 360681 6/2812012 104020 DALCO COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,546.60 92.45 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00005340 290655 2475226 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 628.43 SEWER BLOCK 00001513 290726 2474622 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 319.56 WYPALLS, GLASS CLEANER 00001454 290727 2475210 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 184.89- RETURN 00001454 290728 2475512 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 855.55 ' 360684 612812012 102831, .DEX MEDIA EASTINC. 360682 6128/2012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 151.20 650487671 290927 BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING 336.00 290590 655419 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 278.05 290591 655797 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,737.05 290761 655798 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,107.70 290869 655795 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 87.80 290870 655796 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,546.60 360683 612812012 100720 ' DENNYS STH AVE. BAKERY 89.61 BAKERY • 290695 415741 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 86.04 290696 415834 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL " 56.96 290697 416031 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 232.61 ' 360684 612812012 102831, .DEX MEDIA EASTINC. 151.20 650487671 290927 650487671 -6/12 5510.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 151.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2712012 8:21:55 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/28/2012 — 6128/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360685 6/2812012 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 6,855.07 STREET PAINT 00001304 290729 802138173 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 6,855.07 360686 612812012 129062 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 882.50 CONSTRUCTION PLANS 290928 0051411 5750.1720 BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET 882.50 360687 612812012 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 1,060.20 TRAFFIC CONES 00001426 290730 0099238 -IN 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 1,060.20 360688 612812012 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 39.85 911 UPGRADE 290523 09034400 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 39.85 360689 6/2812012 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 14,925.00 ART FAIR CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS 290524 061812 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 14,925.00 360690 612812012 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 134.70 BEER 290698 149 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 134.70 360691 612812012 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 270.00 YOUTH SUMMER CATALOG AD 290825 YS -12 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 270.00 YOUTH SUMMER CATALOG AD 290826 YS-02 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 540.00 360692 612812012 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 154.60 290871 974 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 154.60 360693 6/28/2012 100049 EHLERS 3,585.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 290525 63082 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 1,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 290526 63080 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 4,585.00 360694 612812012 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 4,194.12 PUMP REPAIR 00001474 290527 0047459 -IN 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 4,194.12 R55CKREG LOG20000 CONCERT SOUND AMPLIFICATION 290656 JULY 4TH 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CITY OF EDINA 360698 6/28/2012 120329 ;FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIAL71ES INC 161.95 Council Check Register PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.95 360699 6128/2012 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 6/28/2012 — 6/28/2012 290592 4745 5842.5514 Check # Date Amount Supplier /,Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360695 612812012 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 6,145.31 ADJ RINGS 00001349 290528 RR2811 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,145.31 ADJ RINGS 00001349 - 290529 RR2812 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,360.50 CASTINGS 00001349 290530 RR2813 5932.6536 CASTINGS 2,778.75 IRON 00001349 290531 RR2428 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 19,429.87 360696 6/2812012 102179 EULL'S'MANUFACTURING CO INC. 474.95 CB PRECAST 00001348 290532 005934 5932.6520 CONCRETE 474.95 360697 612812012 126909 FETTE PRODUCTIONS 6127/2012 8:21:55 Page - 9 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS GENERAL STORM SEWER DISTRIBUTION GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,100.00 CONCERT SOUND AMPLIFICATION 290656 JULY 4TH 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 2,100.00 360698 6/28/2012 120329 ;FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIAL71ES INC 161.95 BOOTS 00003760 290929 7571 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.95 360699 6128/2012 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 200.00 290592 4745 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 200.00 360700 6/2812012 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 2,110.78 JET HOSE 00001475 290533 15330 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,110.78 360701 6/2812012 126851 FLUTE COCKTAIL 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/2/12 290954 062512 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 360702 6/2812012 130475 FUNTIME FUNKTIONS COLLECTION SYSTEMS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6 /14/12 290963 062512 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 360703 6/28/2012 130341 GALLIGAN,,SHEILA 1,000.00 ORGANIZATION SERVICES 290964 0111EDINA 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL-SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 1,000.00 360704 6128/2012 101931 GEAR FOR-SPORTS 540.99 MERCHANDISE 290699 40584911 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21155 Council Check Register Page - 10 ' 6/28/2012 — 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descdption Business Unit 540.99 360705 6/2812012 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION. 2,450.00 PLAYGROUND T- SHIRTS 290657 83655 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 2,450.00 360706 612812012 128160 GLASS MAN TC, THE 533.57 REPAIR GLASS DOOR 290965 48614 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 533.57 360707 612812012 102167 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS I 5,481.50 AQUATIC CENTER SURF FEATURE 290966 APPL 2 5300:1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 4,938.50 290967, APPL 3 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 10,420.00 360708 612812012 100778 GOODIN COMPANY 525.50 CENT PUMP 00007132 290827 . 01105725-00 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 525.50 360709 612812012 101178 GOPHER 227.06 FITNESS WEIGHTS 00003793 .290930 8487355 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 157.29 FITNESS WEIGHTS - 00003781 290931_ 8474969 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 384.35 360710 612812012 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 'j 1,782.50 MAY 2012 TICKETS 00001489 290534 40628 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,782.50 360711 6128/2012 114697 GOPHER STRIPINGtO. 450.00 PARKING LOT STRIPING 00001557 290658 12036 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 450.00 360712 612812012 130461 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC. 16,150.00 HRIS ENHANCEMENTS 290864 07 -7779 4411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HRIS UPGRADE PROJECT 16,150.00 360713 612812012' 102645. GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 226.58 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00001590 290731 739 " 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 226.58 360714 6/2812012 101103 GRAINGER 3.27' SCISSORS 00005329 290535 .9852034355 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ti Subledger Account-Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/2712012 8:21:55 Page- 11 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 112.89 CABLE TIES 00005329 290535 9852034355 1646.6406 4.45 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00005339 290659 9853152743 1642.6406 133.82 CIRCULATOR PUMP 290828_ 9846419928 5311.6406 2,745.19 AIR FILTERS, CARTRIDGE FILTERS 00002158 290829 9848782745 5720.6406 2,999.62 360715 612812012 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 91.00 290593 00028648 5842.5513 91.00 360716 612812012 120201 GRANICUS INC. 1,059.68 WEBSTREAMING -JUNE 290630 35633 1130.6124 1,059.68 WEBSTREAMING - JULY 290831 36923 1130.6124 2,119.36 360717 6128/2012 102217 GRAPE BE_ GINNINGS INC 180.50 290762 140841 5862.5513 180.50 360718 6/2812012 101350 GREEN ACRES, SPRINKLER CO. 169.53 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 290932 122209 1470.6180 169.53 360719 6/2812012 102125 .GREG LESSMAN'SALES 348.86 MERCHANDISE 290700 47282 5440.5511 348.86 360720' 612812012 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 223.43 TRIMMING SUPPLIES 00001555 290832 110063 1641.6406 223.43 360721 6/28/2012 126992 HARRINGTON, DEAN 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7 /5112 290958 062512 - 5760.6136 150.00 - 360722 6/2812012 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,427.87 CHEMICALS 00005243 290536 3348386 5915.6586 405.87 HYDRO ACID, BLEACH 290833 3350620 5311.6545 821.95 CHLORINE, BLEACH 290834 3350639 5311.6545 2,655.69 360723 612812012 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Subledger Account-Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/2712012 8:21:55 Page- 11 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA..: 6/27/2012 8:21:55 - • Council Check Register Page - 12 6/28/2012 _ 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 702.27 PIPE 00001478 290537 4921748 5932.6535 PIPE GENERAL STORM SEWER 702.27 360724 612812012 101676 HEGGIES PIZZA 276.00 - PIZZA 290835 1714256 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 276.00 360726 612812012 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 34.20. SPEAKERS'. 00004339 290836 51346704 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 822.65 PC FOR UTILITY BILLING 00004339 :290837 51357720 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 856.85 i 360726. 612812012 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 770.10 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001063 290538 13327 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 770.10 360727 612812012 .104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 557.50 290594 .604934 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,085.52 290763 605614 5642.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 537.00 290872 605737 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 658.00 290873 `605780. 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 'I 2,838.02 - - 360728 612812012 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 190,540.00 1ST QTR INSTALLMENT 290701 062012 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES. GENERAL 190,540.00 360729 612812012 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 376.29 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 290660 062012 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 376.29 I. 360730 6128/2012 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 917.96 METER REPLACEMENT LETTERS 290839 64684 05536.1705.17_ UTILITY COORDINATION; WATER METER REPLACEMENT 917.96 360731 612812012. 100814 'INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 66.13 IRRIGATION PARTS. 00001455 290539 713618 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 42.77 PVC CEMENT, PRIMER 00007133 290838 713429 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 108.90 i 360732 612812012 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 6715 PAGE FOR VETERAN MEMORIAL BaDBD7138 290840 91962 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 7411.6188 01387.1705.21 1301.6151 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE CONSULTING INSPECTION EQUIPMENT RENTAL 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 13 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5822.5514 67.15 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 360733 612812012 5421.5514 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM GRILL 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 27.24 INTERNET/WEB 290933 9785968 5862.5514 27.24 VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 360734 6128/2012 5842.5514 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE 'CO. OF MN YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 104.26 DOG FENCE REPAIR 290540 153742 1643.6530 104.26 GENERAL TURF CARE 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 360735 6/2812012 1643.6530 100823 J & F REDDY RENTS INC. GENERAL TURF CARE 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 183.80 CONCRETE MIXER 00001516 290732 03- 353333 -02 5842.5513 183.80 YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 360736 6/2812012 5822.5513 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,046.42 5822.5513 290595 1819834 5822.5513 6,040.05 50TH ST SELLING 290596 1819836 293.70 290764 1834311 21.50 290765 1819883 18.00 290874 1819895 110.00 290875 1819886 5,470.75 290876 1819884 344.40 291000 1819898 7,365.27 291001 1819894 22,710.09 ' 360737 612812012 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 220.55 WEED SPRAY 00001453 290541 61642884 178.64 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001447 290661 61590295 281.32 SPRAYER PARTS, ROUNDUP 00001451 290662 61620884 27.52 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001453 290663 61619808 30.34 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005330, 290664 61658185 738.37 360739 6/28/2012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 602.34 290597 1320254 212.14 290598 1321177 227.88 290599 1321166 1,156.00 290600 1319742 1,021.46 290601 1319743 20.99 290602 1319744 516.40 290603 1319746 7411.6188 01387.1705.21 1301.6151 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE CONSULTING INSPECTION EQUIPMENT RENTAL 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 13 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 1643.6530 REPAIR-PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/2712012 8:21:55 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/28/2012 = 6/2812012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 184.24 290604 1321179 5842.5513 COST 6F�GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,252.79 '290766 132511 5822.5512 COST OFGOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 1,931.95 290767 1325113 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,174.28 290768 1325121 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,333.35 290769 1325123 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,202.83 290770 1325120 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,569.02 290771 1325125 5862:5512 'COST OF,GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON-SELLING- 121.12 290772 1325126 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 317.95 290773 : 1325124 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 385.91 290774 . A325122 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 691.38 .290877 1325109 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 166.98 290878 1325110 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 695.52 290879 1325112 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 2,694.05 .290880 1325117 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,764.14 290881 1325119 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,860.77 290882 1325115 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,964.82 290883 1325116 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 382.19 .290884 1325118 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,044.19 290885 1325114 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 42.52- 290886 537750 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 572.35 291002 1325595 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.00- 291003 537987 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 14.00- 291004 537988. 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36,009.52 360740 612812012 130476 JOHNSON, BETSY 3.22 SEASON PASS REFUND 290968 062012 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 44.28 SEASON PASS REFUND 290968 062012 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 47.50 360741 612812012 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 22.11 PETTY CASH 290969 061912 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 23.80 PETTY CASH 290969 061912 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 34.13 PETTY CASH 290969 061912 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 47.77 PETTY CASH 290969 061912 _ 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 55.19 PETTY CASH 290969 061912 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 71.18 PETTY CASH 290969 061912 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 79.46 PETTY CASH 290969 061912. 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 333.64 360742 612812012 102719 .JOHNSON, PHILLIP. 21.97 LASER PAPER, RUBBER BANDS 290665 061812 5125.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Council Check Register Page'- 15 6/28/2012 -612812012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account. Description Business Unit 44.20 PROGRAMMABLE TIMER 290665 061812 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 'STUDIO 83.51 SURGE OUTLET, CORD 290665 061812 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA 149.68 360743 612812012 111018 KEEPRS'INC. 559.96 UNIFORMS 00003791 290934 189911 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 305.96- CREDIT 290935 179545 -90 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 23.66 00003759 290936 190282 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.96 00003791 290937 189911 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 199.95 00003795 290938 189889 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.96 00003784 290939 189186 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.96 00003794 290940 187903 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 957.49 360744 6128/2012 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC 286.21 ROCK 00001480 290542 223976 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 286.21 360745 6128/2012 130472 KW SPECIALTY SERVICES, LLC 595.00 MECH INSULATION OF COLD WATEM001522 290970 943 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS' POOL OPERATION 595.00 360746 6/2812012 129813 LA VALLEUR, BARBARA - 328.15 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT. 290971 061912 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES.-. PUBLIC ART 328.15 360747 612812012 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 689.00 VALVE REPLACEMENT 290543 1604S 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 198.00 REMOVE RESIN,FROM FAUCETS 290545 1602S 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING'INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 198.00 REMOVE RESIN FROM FAUCET 290546 1601S 05525.1705.21 CONSUL-TING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 198.00 REMOVE RESIN FROM FAUCET 290581 1603S 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 1,283.00 360748 6/2812012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 415.38 NUTS, WASHERS, SCREWS 00005334 290547 9300905499 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 178.80 DRILL BITS 00001541 290733 9300905498 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 631.31 WASHERS 00001295 290734 9300876862 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 103.40 WASHERS 00001295 290735 9300889977 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 1,328.89 360749 6/28/2012 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 811.07 EXPENSES FOR SECRET SERVICE 290841 062112 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/28/2012 -6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 811.07 360750 6128/2012 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 132.90 COPIER USAGE 00005341 290548 1415814 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.90 360751 6/2812012 100858 LOGIS 155.00 290842 35084 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,210.00 290842 35084 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,569.00 290842 35084 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,085.00 290842 35084 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 3,172.00 290842 35084 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,174.00 290842 35084 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,323.00 290842 35084 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,994.00 290842 35084 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 155.00 290843 35200 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,210.00 290843 35200 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,569.00 290843 35200 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,085.00 290843 35200 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 3,172.00 290843 35200 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,174.00 290843 35200 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,323.00 290843 35200 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,994.00 290843 35200 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 53,364.00 360752 612812012 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 106.66 TRAINING EXPENSES 290666 061812 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 106.66 360753 612812012 101792 LUBE -TECH 422.16 GREASE 00005332 290549 2063901 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 422.16 360754 612812012 100443 LUCHT, PETE 19.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 290972 062512 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 19.00 360755 612812012 122472 M & I BANK 41.89 EXPENSES /SUPPLIES 290941 061412 7410.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PSTF ADMINISTRATION 63.19 EXPENSES /SUPPLIES 290941 061412 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 218.39 EXPENSES /SUPPLIES 290941 061412 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 256.86 EXPENSES /SUPPLIES 290941 061412 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Council Check Register Page - 17 6/28/2012 -6128/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 281.98 EXPENSES /SUPPLIES 290941 061412 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 527.84 EXPENSES /SUPPLIES 290941 061412 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,390.15 360756 6/28/2012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 887.80 291005 133606 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 887.80 360757 612812012 114593 MAAP 10.00 DUES - LIZ LOPEZ 290667 061912 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 75.00 CONFERENCE 290667 061912 1190.6104 CONFERENCES'.& SCHOOLS ASSESSING 10.00 DUES - MITZI WICKLUND 290668 062012 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 75.00 CONFERENCE 290668 062012 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 170.00 360758 612812012 130155 MACDONNELL, STEPHEN 324.00 MODEL 290669 061812 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 324.00 360769 612812012 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 320.00 HOSTING FEE 290973 171 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 320.00 360760 6/28/2012 106119 MCDONALD, SHERRY 164.71 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 290702 5504 GLENGARRY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PKWY 164.71 360761 612812012 129636 MELANDER, MARK 50.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 290670 061912 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.74 OFFICE FURNITURE - SOUTHDALE 290844 062112 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 134.74 360762 6/2812012 101483 MENARDS 44.51 CEDAR LUMBER 00001458 290671 82603 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 43.09 INSECT CONTROL ITEMS 00001464 290672 83254 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 44.50 PAINT 00006017 290703 83244 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 83.66 LUMBER - 00001525 290736 79626 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 82.53 GLOVES, KNEE PADS 00001508 290737 78003 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.22 TOP SOIL 00002163 290845 85896 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 323.51 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY.OF EDINA 360769 6128/2012 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD Council Check Register 90.00 POST LICENSE FEE 290846" 6/28/2012 — 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360763 612812012 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 1,176.00 56 TEAMS 11,610.55 FINAL PAYMENT 290738 062912 03462.1705.30 -- 18,108.60 FINAL PAYMENT 290738 062912 05512.1705.30_ 26,973.99 FINAL PAYMENT 290738 062912 043761705.30 .5820.6104 65,647.08 FINAL PAYMENT 290738 062912 01370.1705.30 200.00 122,340.22 290942 2012 -24 5840.6104 500.00 360764 612812012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN.SEWER & 1,470.00 REPLACE STANDPIPE 00001490 290550 34101 5913.6180 1,470.00 360765 612812012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,000.00 SEWER/WATER REPLACEMENT. 00001060 290739 34099 05525.1705.21 4,210.00 SEWERANATER REPLACEMENT 00001060 290739 34099 03471.1705.21 6,210.00 360766 612812012 100913 . MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,000.00 SEWERIWATER REPLACEMENT 00001061 290740 34100 05525.1705.21 3,765.00 SEWERIWATER REPLACEMENT 00001061 290740 34100 03471.1705.21 5.765.00 360767 6128/2012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 4,535.00 SEWER REPLACEMENT 00001068 290741 34104 03471.1705.21 4,535.00 360768 612812012 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 WATER LICENSE 290974 RENEWAL 5919.6260 23.00 360769 6128/2012 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 90.00 POST LICENSE FEE 290846" 062012 1400.6104 90.00 360770 6/2812012 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS 1,176.00 56 TEAMS 290976 SOFTBALL 2012 4077.6105 1,176.00 -- 360771 612812012 101316 MMBA 125.00 WINE TRAINING COURSE 290942 2012 -24 .5820.6104 175.00 WINE TRAINING COURSE 290942 2012 -24 5860.6104 200.00 WINE TRAINING COURSE 290942 2012 -24 5840.6104 500.00 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION LICENSES PERMITS CONFERENCES &`SCHOOLS DUES &'SUBSCRIPTIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page - 18 Business Unit SS-462 CARSONS HILL RECON CARSONS HILL RECON CARSONS HILL RECON BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON i DISTRIBUTION RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK TRAINING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 50TH STREET GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 6127/2012 8:21:55 Page - 19 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING ASSESSING 100.00 CONFERENCE - DARIN CIZEK 290674 2012 CAN - AM CITY OF EDINA CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS R55CKREG LOG20000 100.00 360775 612812012 Council Check Register 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 505.59 Check # Date Amount. Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360772 612812012 848474 -00 102812 MN- DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 79.81 40.00 REI PERMIT 290975 062212 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 40.00 MODULE 00002031 290946 848474 -01 5761.6530 360773 6128/2012 104477 MN STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS 25.00 ASSESSOR LICENSE UPGRADE 290673 062012 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 25.00 438.00 360774 612812012 5842.5513 102308 MSANI YORK SELLING 6127/2012 8:21:55 Page - 19 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING ASSESSING 360780 612812012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 21.43 REGISTER PAPER 290552 1473399164 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 21.43 100.00 CONFERENCE - DARIN CIZEK 290674 2012 CAN - AM 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 360775 612812012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 505.59 CONVERSION ASSEMBLY, TOOLS 00002051 290943 851108 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING _ 49.32 MODULE 00002031 290944 848474 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 79.81 NOZZLES 00002036 290945 849231 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 67.44. MODULE 00002031 290946 848474 -01 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 702.16 36.0776 612812012 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 438.00 290775 74284 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 105.50 290776 74279 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 543.50 • 360777 6/2812012 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,724.42 SIGNS 00001392 290742 TI- 0249665 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS " 1,724.42 360778 6/2812012 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 585.14 LIGHTS 00005212 290551. 30779 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 585.14 ' 360779 6128/2012 130141 DENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 128.00 290605 682 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 399.00 290777 622 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 274.00 290887 690 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 360780 612812012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 21.43 REGISTER PAPER 290552 1473399164 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 21.43 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/28/2012 —6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360781 6/2812012 130127 OLD TOWNE GLASS COMPANY 1,000.00 REPLACE BROKEN WINDOWS 290553 W1111 -1 5841.6530 1,000.00 '+ 360782 612812012 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 148.37 'SLINGS 00003799 290985 685734 1470.6406 148.37 360783 612812012 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 1,770.00 PLAY STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE 290848 .2282 5720.6530 1.770.00 360784 612812012 101470 ORVIS, JOAN ! 336.10 REIMBURSE FOR TROPHIES 290554 "061912 5511.6406 6,063.00 % SPRING CLASS CHECK � 290983 -062212 5510:6103 6,399.10 360785 6/2812012 129214 OWERSON SEWER AND -WATER INC. 2,488.50 SEWER REPLACEMENT 00001050 290743 2799 03471.1705.21 2,488.50 360786 612812012 130459 PALMA; VIDA 178.00 SUMMER CLASS REFUND 290704 061912 5511.6136 178.00 360787 612812012 129485 PAPCO INC. 114.37 TOWELS, FOAM SOAP 290947 72162 7411.6511 114.37 360788 612812012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 982.76 290606 8354002 -IN 5822.5513 n 220.00 290607 8354475 -IN 5842.5513 33.25 290778 8355014 -IN 5862.5515 4,261.29 290779 .8355005 -IN 5862.5513 3,501.41 290780 8354990 7IN 5842.5513 1,695.15 290888 8354996 -IN 5822.5513 65.25 291006 8355063 -IN 5842.5513 10,759.11 360789 612812012 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 307.17 290555 74522333 4075:5510 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD 6127/2012 8:21:55 Page - 20 I YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS ARENA ADMINISTRATION RICHMOND HILLS PK ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PSTF OCCUPANCY 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 3 VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING i 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VANVALKENBURG R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/28/2012 -6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation' PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,290.63 290849 75329801 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL'. 140.62 290850 75329745 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 383.08 290851 63738241 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 483.70 290889 73572920 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,605.20 360790 612812012 - 100950 PETTY CASH 5.37 290948 062212 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 5.59 290948 062212 1130.6235 POSTAGE COMMUNICATIONS 7.77 290948 062212 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 9.00 290948 062212 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 12.93 290948 062212 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 13.44 290948 062212 05524.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES VALLEY ESTATES 13.98 290948 062212 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 17.21 290948 062212 5910.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL (BILLING) 18.00 290948 062.212 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 19.00 290948 062212 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 20.00 290948 062212 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 21.43 290948 062212 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.40 290948 062212 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 25.66 290948 062212 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 27.00 290948 062212 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 31.27 290948 062212 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING 34.40 290948 062212 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 39.00 290948 062212 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 40.38 290948 062212 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 46.08 290948 062212 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 46.79 290948 062212 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 50.00 290948 062212 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 53.28 290948 062212 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 57.20 290948 062212 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 64.38 290948 062212 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 66.62 290948 062212 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 75.00 290948 062212 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE 80.00 290948 062212 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 80.71 290948 062212 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 1,003.89 360792 6128/2012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 264.24 290608 2257048 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 309.76 290609 2257046 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/28/2012 -6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 168.00 290610 2256414 5842.5513 188.48 290611 .2256131 5822.5513 1,076.77 290612 2256127 5822.5513 349.60 290613 2256126 5822.5513 460.70 290781 2259649 5862.5512 1,179.19 290782 2259642 5862.5513 605.62 290783 2259650 5862.5513 2,361.36 290784 2259648 5862.5513 642.36 290890 2259640 5822.5513 273.70 290891 2259644 5822.5513 1,098.32 290892 2259647 5842.5513 607.09 290893 2259641 5842.5513 3,657.86 290894 2259645 5842.5513 764.64 290895 2259646 5842.5512 48.00 '291007 2259901- 5862.5513 448.54 291008 2259643 5822.5512 144.00 291009 2259900 5842.5513 52.50- 291010 3484360 , '5842.5512 5.74 -. 291011 3484363 5842.5512 55.15- 291012 3484404 5842.5513 25.34 291013 3484403' 5842.5513 13.33- 291014 . 3484361- '5842.5513 4.73- 291015 3484362 5842.5512 14,491.44 360793 612812012 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 200.00 291016 15615 5862.5515 200.00 360794 6/2812012 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 237.50 ' STAFF PORTRAITS 290949 062112 1130.6408 237.50 360795 6/2812012 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 6,574.48 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 290977 062512 1130.6123 6,574.48 360796 612812012 129727 PRIOR LAKE WINDJAMMERS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7 /1/12 290953 062512 5760.6136 150.00 360797 612812012 130473 PRIVATE UNDERGROUND Subledger Account Description. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD' LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLDLIQUOR 6/27/2012 821:55 Page - 22 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH ST'SELLING 50TH STSELLING 50TH ST:SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST;SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH STiSELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT Council Check Register 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 165.00 LOCATE WIRES FOR ADDITION 00002044 290978 7499 FRANCE 5750.1720 165.00 360798 612812012 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 843.50 INSTALL ADAPTER AND VALVE 00001492 290556 14077 5912.6180 843.50 360799 612812012 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 700.00 REPLACED BALLASTS, LIGHTS 00002050 290950 96535 5761.6180 700.00 360800 612812012 125936 . REINDERS INC. 1,166.54 FERTILIZER 00001459 290852 3015450 -00 1643.6540 1,166.54 360801 612812012 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 1,578.50 ABOUT TOWN AD SALES OOSUMMEFE90557 612151 -7 1130.6123 198.00 ABOUT TOWN AD SALES OOSPRING 290558 312151 -7 1130.6123 1,776.50 360802 612812012 130458 RIVERA, JULIO 85.00 SUMMER CLASS REFUND 290705 061912 5511.6136 85.00 360803 612812012 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 61.43 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 290744 00268928 1470.6406 29.48 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 290745 00269170 1470.6406 174.44 SOFTENER SALT 00001529 290746 00269321 1552.6406 619:88 SOFTENER SALT 290951 00268783 5521.6406 885.23 360804 612812012 101682 S'8 S WORLDWIDE INC. 286.38 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM SUPPLIES 290853 7363917 1624.6406 286.38 360805 612812012 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 519.78 HAND FANS FOR PARADE 290854 SH2O38 1100.6406 519.78. 360806 612812012 118166 .SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 290747 INV- 06696 -2012 1470.6160 733.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 290748 INV- 06826 -2012 1470.6160 Subledger Account Description BUILDINGS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS FERTILIZER r 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page - 23 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET WELL HOUSES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING GENERAL TURF CARE MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA•BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 140.00 5421.6180 CITY OF EDINA GRILL 360810 612812012 50TH SST SELLING - 120784 SIGN PRO Council Check Register I 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 307.80 SURF INTO SUMMER POSTERS 6128/2012 -6128/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No VERNON SELLING 360811 783.00 YORK SELLING 101000 SIR SPEEDY COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 360807 612812012 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 130478 SCHERER, MICHAEL BUSINESS CARDS 290559 72788• 5862.5513 75.00 'SPRING CLASS REFUND 290984 062212 5511.6136 360812 75.00 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION, INC 360808 612812012 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL FREEZER REPAIR 290706 29086 625.84 . K9 TRIALS EXPENSES `290675 061812 1400.6104 28988 625.84 818.10 'r 360809 612812012 6128/2012 103249 -- SHANNON, JIM 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 140.00 CL PERFORMANCE 713/12 290955:. 062512 5760.6136 5310.6575 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PRINTING 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page - 24 Business, Unit i ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS i POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE POOL ADMINISTRATION 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 140.00 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 360810 612812012 50TH SST SELLING - 120784 SIGN PRO COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 307.80 SURF INTO SUMMER POSTERS 290855 5665 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 307.80 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 360811 612812012 YORK SELLING 101000 SIR SPEEDY COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 49.70 BUSINESS CARDS 290559 72788• 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 49:70 360812 612812012 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION, INC 382.10 FREEZER REPAIR 290706 29086 436.00 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 290707 28988 818.10 360813 6128/2012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 441.00 290614 1827618 1,022.83 290615 1776551 96.50 290616 1787613 610.68 290785 1806999 3,461.71 290786 1833400 144.58 290787 1833402 4,032.08 290788 1787620 3,117.19 290896 1833401 120.59 291017 1833423 616.50 291018 1787615 5,187.50 291019 1787618 18,851.16 360814 612812012 104672 SPRINT 5310.6575 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PRINTING 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page - 24 Business, Unit i ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS i POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE POOL ADMINISTRATION 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH SST SELLING - 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE Council Check Register TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE ASSESSING TELEPHONE 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No TELEPHONE 2.52 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 290979 873184124 -115 5511.6188 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 11.13 STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 290979 873184124 -115 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 17.32 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 290979 873184124 -115 1180.6103 38.43 290979 873184124 -115 7411.6188 46.20 290979 873184124 -115 1240.6188 47.46 290979 873184124 -115 4090.6188 53.13 290979 873184124 -115 1190.6188 61.53 290979 873184124 -115 1553.6188 63.07 290979 873184124 -115 1490.6188 75.07 290979 873184124 -115 1628.6188 75.39 290979 873184124 -115 5720.6188 117.39 290979 873184124 -115 5422.6188 156.87 290979 873184124 -115 1495.6188 160.64 290979 873184124 -115 1554.6230 380.67 290979 873184124 -115 1260.6188 433.12 290979 873184124 -115 1301.6188 480.03 290979 873184124 -115 1322.6188 719.82 290979 873184124 -115 1470.6151 722.25 290979 873184124 -115 1640.6188 946.54 290979 873184124 -115 5910.6188 1,796.03 290979 873184124 -115 1400.6188 6,404.61 360815 612812012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 17.47 PIPE CAP 00001476 290560 S2557972.001 5932.6406 67.44 VAC BREAKER CP 00001547 290676 S2562937.001 1646.6578 371.37 PLUMBING PARTS 00001463 290677 S2562167.001 - 1646.6530 456.28 ' 360816 612812012 129745 ST LOUIS PARK DQ GRILL AND CHI 41.98 BIRTHDAY CAKES 290856 584 5720.6406 41.98 360817 6/2812012 105387 ST. PAUL LINOLEUM & CARPET CO. 19,000.00 CARPET REPLACEMENT 290980 0064712 7411.6710 19,000.00 360818 612812012 101015 STREICHERS 84.42 FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES 00003027 290561 1936248 1400.6406 89.99 TRAUMA PLATE 290562 1936261 1400.6203 174.41 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 25 Subledger Account Description Business Unit TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE ASSESSING TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 612812012 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. CITY AF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21:55 810.00 MOVIES 290858 Council Check Register 5760.6136 Page - 26 810.00 6/28/2012 -6/28/2012 612812012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360819 6128/2012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 40.00 360825 612812012 100.00 VEHICLE REPAIR 00005344 290563 611659 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118.30 MERCHANDISE 100:00 18191697 5440.5511 36.58 360820 6128/2012 5440.5511 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 204.82 290711 18191700 5440.5511 1,596.30 HELP WANTED AD 290857 1383354 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 60.80 1,596.30 290713 18141726 5440.5511 125.40 360821 612812012 - 17512743 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS 60MMUNICATIO 79.20- 290715 17728324 13.35 CELLPHONE REPAIR 290678. 32793 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICEbEPT. GENERAL 360826 13:35 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 360822 612812012 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 061912 1140.6107 109.89 1,635.00 290789 002892 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 688.00 290897 002941 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 874.00 290898 003028 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 360823 612812012 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 810.00 MOVIES 290858 -D61696106 5760.6136 810.00 360824 612812012 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 290708 230825 - 5421.6102 40.00 360825 612812012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 118.30 MERCHANDISE 290709 18191697 5440.5511 36.58 290710 18191698 5440.5511 204.82 290711 18191700 5440.5511 139.65 290712 18063585 5440.5511 60.80 290713 18141726 5440.5511 125.40 290714 - 17512743 5440.5511 79.20- 290715 17728324 5440.5511 606.35 360826 6/2812012 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 109.89 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 290564 061912 1140.6107 109.89 360827 612812012 125223 TELECOM SUPERSTORE 220.51 HEADSET FOR A. KATTREH 00004336 , 290859 18175 5720.6406 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS, R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Council Check Register Page - 27 ' 6/28/2012 -6/28/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 220.51 360828 6128/2012 113549 TENNIS WEST 1,605.00 FENCE REPAIRS 00001564 290860 12- 007313 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE - 1,605.00 360829 6/2812012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 335.00 290716 00773281 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 220.00 290717 696735 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 64.50 290899 696906 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD'BEER VERNON SELLING 96.90 290900 696907 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 21.50 290901 696913 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,999.18 290902 696905 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,737.08 360830 6/2812012 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 720.00 FACILITY RESERVATIONS 290679 30182 1600.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PARK-ADMIN. GENERAL 720.00 360831 612812012 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 200.00 COUNCIL MINUTES 6/5812 290718, M19122 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 200.00 360832 612812012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 306.15 RIM 00005343 290565 JI62363 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.06 MOWER PARTS 00001439 290566 J162238A 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 376.21 360833 612812012 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 118.37 HINGE TWEEKING TOOL 00001527 290680 522545 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 118.37 360834 612612012 126926 ULTIMATE EVENTS 548.79 RENTAL FOR JULY 4TH STAGING 290681 FIREWORKS 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 548.79 360835 6/28/2012 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 32.33 CAMERA RETURN 00001486 290567 TRAN:0030 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 10.10 SHIPPING CHARGE 00005345 290568 TRAN:2284 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 42.43 360836 612812012 114236 USA BLUE BOOK R55CKREG LOG20000 556.43 CITY OF EDINA 360839 612812012 Council Check Register 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 6/28/2012 - 6/28/2012 40.93 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 149.43 LOCATING FLAGS 00001336 290569 684280 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2310.6406 149.43 25.44 COUPLINGS 00001420 360837 6/28/2012 6406914 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 77.71 TAPE MEASURE, PLIERS 548.62 LIQUOR BAGS 290570 239253 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 799.31 LIQUOR BAGS 290571 239252 -00 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1552.6406 1,347.93 2,427.68 360838 612812012 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 360840 612812012 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 92.27 290682 2755462000 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 32.95 CONCESSION PRODUCT 290952 2756126101 5952.6188 TELEPHONE 5320.5510 40.01 290952 2756126101 1130.6188 TELEPHONE 290862 102.84 5320.5510 290952 2756126101 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 288.36 290952 2756126101 1470.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 6/2712012 8:21:55 Page - 28 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RECYCLING COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING E911 CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CLASS REGISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 556.43 360839 612812012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 40.93 CONNECTORS, CONDUIT 00001509 290572 6414890 1552.6406 472.47 911 UPGRADE PARTS 00001509 290572 6414890 2310.6406 25.44 COUPLINGS 00001420 290573 6406914 1552.6406 77.71 TAPE MEASURE, PLIERS 00001420 290573 6406914 1301.6556 1,811.13 WIRE, CONDUIT 00001530 290574 6429757 1552.6406 2,427.68 360840 612812012 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 749.38 CONCESSION PRODUCT 290661 33925673 5320.5510 622.67 290862 33698845 5320.5510 1,372.05 360841 612812012 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 713/12 290956 062512 5760.6136 150.00 360842 612812012 130474 WALLACE, BARBARA 138.00 CLASS REFUND 290981 062012 5101.4607 138.00 360843 612812012 129142 WALLY S SERVICE STATION INC. 20.95 GASOLINE 00003576 290863 061512 1470.6406 20.95 360844 6128/2012 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 6/2712012 8:21:55 Page - 28 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RECYCLING COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING E911 CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CLASS REGISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 360845 612812012 360846 6/28/2012 823.93 50TH ST-SELLING 290791 CITY OF EDINA 2,125.38 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register 360847 6/28/2012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD"MIX 6/28/2012 -6/28/2012 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 427.99 SUGA.TRAINING CONFERENCE 290683 EXPENSE 2310.6104 427.99 YORK SELLING 290793 413782 1,064.00 102798. WEST PAYMENT CENTER 290794 412871 758.09 MAY 2012 SERVICE 290575 825082190 1400.6103 758.09 290904 412870 578.72 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 290905 413985 584.25 290617 302233 -00 5822.5513 717.20 290790 30264400 5842 5513 823.93 50TH ST-SELLING 290791 302641 -00 2,125.38 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 360847 6/28/2012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD"MIX YORK SELLING 492.59 50TH ST SELLING 290618 412983 243.92, VERNON SELLING 290792 413780 1,284.32 YORK SELLING 290793 413782 1,064.00 290794 412871 3,015.52 290903 413781 1,064.00 290904 412870 578.72 290905 413985 162.24 290906 413984 202.24 290907 413779 8,107.55 360848 6/2812012 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 1,728.12 FERTILIZER, FUNGICIDE 00002025 290982 000057827605 1,728.12 360849 6/2812012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,657.16 290619 758584 6,640.45 290795 762203 71.95 290796• 762204 271.55 290797 762201 5,043.37 290798 762200 28.10 290799 762202 886.08 290800 762198 4,385.80 290801 762194 109.20 290802 762195 1,893.69 290908 762199 1,518.28 291020 763997 1,087.72 291021 763996 5862.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5761.6540 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5822.5512 5862.5512 5862.5515 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST.OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE FERTILIZER 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 29 Business Unit E911 POLICE DEPT: GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST-SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD"MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS-SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 10,773.40 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/28/2012 -6/28/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 291022 762196 5862.5513 291023 762197 5862.5515 360850 6/28/2012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 48.00 290620 913224 21.50 290621 913223 2,498.90 290622 913222 120.00 290623 913519 107.70 290624 913518 4,747.87 290625 913517 222.00 290719 913231 5,321.50 290803 914467 120.00 290804 914469 21.50 290805 914468 4,209.15 290909 913863 124.50 290910 913864 128.00 290911 913865 72.00 291024 916549 64.50 291025 916548 2,849.75 291026 916547 4,050.28 291027 916830 107.50 291028 916831 24,834.65 360851 6128/2012 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 153.58 CART KEY TAGS 290576 279620 153.58 360852 6128/2012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 38.80 51- 5276505 -8 290577 328833275 1,352.01 51- 5619094 -8 290578 328503807 1,863.71 51- 6227619 -3 290579 328683492 3,254.52 360853 612812012 122316 ZACK'S INC. 38.14 GLOVES 00001487 290580 27802 38.14 849,894.10 Grand Total 5822.5514 5822.5515 5822.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5430.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 5822.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5423.6406 1330.6185 1552.6185 5761.6185 5920.6406 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER GENERAL SUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 849,894.10 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page - 30 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF CARS TRAFFIC SIGNALS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING SEWER CLEANING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/28/2012 —6128/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger -Account Description Total Payments 849,894.10 Business Unit 6/27/2012 8:21:55 Page- 31 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 300,871.35 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,046.97 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,000.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 31585.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 89,872.91 05100 ART CENTER FUND 15,857.62 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 49.28 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 28,808.74 ' 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 19,760.14 05500. ICE ARENA FUND 8,901.43 05760 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 12,025.22 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 8,255.75 05800 LIQUOR FUND 204,123.46 05900 UTILITY FUND 98,972.15, 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 32,529.18 ,i 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.95 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 24,201.95 Report Totals 849,894.10 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/28/2012 - 6/2812012 6/27/2012 8:22:56 Page- 1 We confinmto thebest of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the-requirements of-the City of Edina purchasing, policies and R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 713/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 1 7/512012 - 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360854 7/5/2012 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 356.06 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 291264 21- 034536 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 356.06 360855 7/512012 100612 A.M. LEONARD 84.96 KNIFE, SAW BLADE 00002038 291321 C112099460 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 84.96 360856 71512012 101833 A.T.O.M. 425.00 KENNA DICK 291223 062812 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 425.00 NICOLE PESEK . 291223 062812 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 850.00 360857 71512012 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 53.64 ROCK 00001604 291111 37299 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 42.91 ROCK 00001604 291112 37305 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 96.55 360658 71512012 125198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN 128.15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291265 062912 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 128.15 360859 715/2012 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 9,195.53 UTILITY TRUCK BODY 00005620 291428 0132782 -IN 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 9,195.53 360860 71512012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 141.20 291131 1583890 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 162.80 291355 1585415 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 129.20 291356 1585409 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 433.20 360861 71512012 121667 ADVANCED FIRST AID INC. 362.25 LIFEPAK BATTERIES 291086 0612 -172 1628.6406.03 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 362.25 360862 71512012 122055 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC. 1,270.00 E81 & E82 GRAPHICS 291429 185881 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,800.00 E83 GRAPHICS 291430 185880 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,070.00 360863 715/2012 105571 ADVANTAGE PAPER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 2 7/5/2012 — 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 76.95 FOAM CUPS 291087 442849 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 76.95 360864 7/512012 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 59.90 COFFEE 291088 135765 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 59.90 360865 71512012 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 16.57 ART WORK SOLD 291162 062512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.57 360866 71512012 130322 AMBERGATE GARDENS 86.30 FLOWERS 00006250 291182 BRAEMAR 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 86.30 360867 71512012 121207 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF APPRAISERS 605.00 DUES - ROBERT WILSON 291029 240066 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 605.00 360868 716/2012 100665 AMSAN 54.26 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001460 291030 268032612 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 54.26 360869 71512012 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 1,083.61 COPIER PAPER 291431 10328537 -00 155D.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,083.61 360870 71512012 130496 ANDERSON, CAMILLE 24.00 TWINS TRIP REFUND 291322 062812 1600.4390.33 WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 24.00 360871 71512012 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 280.00 PREMIUM 291266 6100000136943 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,837.78 PREMIUM 291267 6100000136952 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 18,147.00 PREMIUM 291268 6100000136951 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 24,264.78 360872 71512012 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 1,030.29 FOOD 291224 1757659 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,030.29 360873 7/512012 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. ' CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 - R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- ` 3 7/5/2012 - 715/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 819.76 MURIATIC ACID, SODIUM BIC_ARB 00007136 291269 39140 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION _ 537.43 CHEMICALS 00007137 291270. 39161 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 3,405.00 RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION 00007109 291271 - 39173 5300.1715 „ LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 4,945:00 BACKWASH & DRAIN PIPING . 291272 39174 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 9,707.19 _ 360874 71512012 130492 ASPENSON, STEVE ` 117.37 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 291225 5110 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CIR 117.37 360875, 71512012 100638 .BACHMAN'S 53.79 HOSE ADAPTERS 291.323 10204851 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 53.79 360676 715/2012 102195 BATTERIES PLUS - - _• 48.95 BATTERIES -- 291226 018- 272134 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES `POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.95 360877 71612012 - 125300. BAUMAN, DOUG 89.36 MILEAGErREIMBURSEMENT - 291324 062912 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 89.36 360878 7/512012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION, 527.20 291102 74044300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON.SELLING 20.50 291357 73942400 5862.5515 COST OF.GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 123.55 291357 73942400 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 671.25 360879 71512012 100661 .BENN, BRADLEY 72.15 ART WORK SOLD 291163 062512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 72.15 360880 71512012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE_ PRODUCTS 104.73 DESK LAMP 291689 WO- 781216 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES • CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - 115.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 291183 WO- 781075 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL - 214.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 291432 0E- 288604 -1- 5662.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 434.19 360881 71512012 130495 BISCAN, SARA 24.00 TWINS TRIP REFUND = 291325 062812 1600.4390.33 WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 24.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 7/6/2012 CITY OF EDINA 130490 BOWLES, LILLIAN Council Check Register CLASS REFUND 291188 062712 715/2012 — 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360882 715/2012 383.50 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 291326 2340:032056 383.50 24,600.00 LANNON WALL REPAIR 00005244 291433 #1 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 130485 BRUESKE, TARA 24,600.00 200.00 360883 7/512012 062512 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 200.00 69.73 KEYS 00006498 291227 S78200 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.73 1,547.55 NEWSLETTER 00008274 291090 28371 360884 715/2012 1,547.55 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 360890 7/512012 496.59 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003731. 291184 80787528 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES BACKGROUND CHECKS 291462 13.20 00003805 291185 80796551 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 2,720.98 00003805 291186 80797894 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 60.00- RETURN 291187 70152227 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 3,170.77 360885 715/2012 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 360886 7/6/2012 130490 BOWLES, LILLIAN 83.00 CLASS REFUND 291188 062712 83.00 360887 715/2012 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 383.50 CANDY 291326 2340:032056 383.50 360888 71512012 130485 BRUESKE, TARA 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/10/12 291080 062512 200.00 360889 71512012 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 1,547.55 NEWSLETTER 00008274 291090 28371 1,547.55 360890 7/512012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 60.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 291462 063012 60.00 360891 71512012 102083 CALHOUN ISLES COMMUNITY BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/9112 291078 062512 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page- 4 Business Unit RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5101.4607 5421.5510 5760.6136 1628.6575 CLASS REGISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 7/5/2012 - 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO;# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account. Desicriptl6n' 'Business Unit 100.00 - 360892 7/5/2012 106153 CALIFORNIA` PIZZA KITCHEN INC., 1,598.51 DEPOSIT:REFUND 272928 101011 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 1,598.51 360893 7.1512012 100004 CAMCO LUBRICANTS - 625.69 LUBRICANT 00008056 291327 78420 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 625.69 a 360894 71512012 102046 - CAMPE, HARRIET - 40.95 ART WORK SOLD 291164 062512 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.95 360895 71512012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 102.55 291132 117789 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,237.10' 291133/' 117788 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 197.00 291359 119407 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING - 7,536.65 ' 360896_ 715/2012 116683 CAT &FIDDLE BEVERAGE 1,020.00 291134 93658. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ° YORK.SELLING , 480.00 291291 93686 5862.5513 COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 360897 - 71512012 .112561 CENTS_ RPOINT ENERGY 1,522.14 5591458 -4 291031 5591458-6/12 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 474.25 5546504 -1 291032 . - 5546504 -6/12' 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. - GENERAL 19.24 291113 5528973 -6/12 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.60 5596524 -8 291189 5596524 -6/12 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 2,033.23 , 360898 7/512012 123898-' CENTURYLINK 58.04 952 922 -2444 291033 2444 -6/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 114.41 952 920 -8166 291034 8166 -6/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL _ 40.30 952922 -9246 291228 9246=6/12 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 56.10 952920 -8632 291,434 8632 -6/12 5913.6188 TELEPHONE,, DISTRIBUTION 268.85 360899 71512012 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 59.00 DISINFECTANT, GLASS CLEANER 291328 517096 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 59.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/5/2012 - 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360900 716/2012 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 425.00 PAYMENT APPLIED TO UTILITIES OOOERROFV91229 COM1129 5900.2015 425.00 360901 71512012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 326.84 00113667- 0120835016 291035 120835016-6/12 5111.6189 326.84 360902 71512012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 236.40 291135 0168021525 5662.5515 234.00 291292 0108030514 5842.5515 470.40 360903 71512012 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 57.72 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291329 062912 1600.6107 57.72 360904 71512012 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 800.80 JULY 2012 MAINTENANCE 291036 070112 5841.6103 800.80 360906 7/512012 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 71,288.30 ASPHALT 00005350 291435 061512 1314.6518 71,288.30 360906 715/2012 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 410.22 CLAY / KEMPER TOOLS 00009153 291436 1W000069000 5110.6564 B09.22 CLAY / KEMPER TOOLS 00009153 291436 1WOOD069000 5120.5510 44.49 WAX RESIST 00009153 291437 INV000069741 5120.6564 109.00 CLAY 00009055 291438 INV000069831 5120.6564 153.00 KILN SHELVES 00009055 291438 INV000069831 5111.6406 68.21 STAIN 291439 R200380226 5120.6564 1,594.14 360907 71512012 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 482.16 HATS 291330 15685 5761.6201 482.16 360908 71512012 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS MIDWE 365.51 PRE CASTS 00001498 291440 S000026467 5932.6520 478.80 PRE CASTS 00001481 291441 S000026312 5932.6520 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page- 6 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET SEWER & WATER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION CRAFT SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CRAFT SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/5/2012 - 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation- PO # - : Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 844.31 360909 7/512012 104020 DALCO 272.53- PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS 00001566 291230 2478261 - 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page 7 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS:SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 272.53' YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 360910 71512012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 134.90 291104 656836 5842.5515 7,331.15 291105 656837. 5842.5514 4,854.45 - 291136 656833 5862.5514 21.50 291293 656832 5862,5515 12,342.00 *.; 360911 71512012: 124357 DELANEY, ALICE - ' 54.60 ART WORK SOLD 291165 062612 5101.4413 54.60 360912 71512012 100718 iDELEGARD TOOL CO. 59.16 TORX DRIVER 00001549 291037 702425 1646.6556 59.10 360913 71512012 100720 DENNYS STH AVE. BAKERY _ 159.54 BAKERY. 291231 416495 5421.5510 87.87 291232 416632 5421.5510 71.69 - 291233 416720" 5421.5510 52.07 .291234 416888 5421.5510 _ 94.22 291331 416991- 5421.5510 465.39 366914 71512012 102831 ,:DEXMEDIA " EAST INC. 56.30 650243624 291332 650243624 -6/12 5760.6122 56.30 _ 360915 715/2012 105967 DIAPER DECK 245.00 INFANT CHANGING TABLE 291273 5749 5311.6406 245.00 360916 71512012" 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 1,924.82 REFUSE 291038 1392852 4095.6103 3,578.67 REFUSE 291039 1398935 4095.6103 5,503.49 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page 7 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS:SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER, YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING ART WORK SOLDL- ART CENTER REVENUES TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE - COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD ADVERTISING OTHER GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BOTH STREET RUBBISH 'PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BOTH STREET RUBBISH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 8 715/2012 —7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360917 71512012 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 44.85 ARTWORK SOLD 291166 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 44.85 360918 71512012 130491 DOOR POWER INC. 115.00 DOOR REPAIR AT BRAEMAR 291190 62203 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 115.00 360919 71512012 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 309.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 291425 062912 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 309.00 360920 71512012 104192 DYNAMIC BRANDS 51.00 UPPER BAG BRACKETS 00006022 291235 785454 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 51.00 360921 71512012 101321 EDINA HARDWARE 190.66 STAIN, BRUSHES 00009054 291442 81981 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 190.66 360922 71512012 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 2,817.50 EDINA ART FAIR 291463 063012 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 2,817.50 360923 71512012 120331 EKKLESIA MEDIA SERVICES 663.00 SOUND SYSTEM REPAIR 291443 3691 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 663.00 360924 71512012 102758 ELDER-JONES BLDG PERMIT SERNC 50.52 PERMIT REFUND 291091 ED114753 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 50.52 360926 71512012 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 1,825.43 MOTOR REPAIR 00001599 291444 395307 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,825.43 360926 715/2012 100747 ELSMORE AQUATIC 165.15 UNIFORM GOGGLES 291274 57210 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 165.15 360927 7/5/2012 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 50.78 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003730 291191 1470232 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/5/2012 - 7/512012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 123.43 291192 1471036 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 111.30 291193 1468035 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 285.51 360928 7/512012 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 165.21 REPLACE WINDOW LETTERING 291040 190 -61683 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 165.21 360929 7/512012 126725 FORTNER, NOLA 33.80 ART WORK SOLD 291167 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 33.80 360930 71512012 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 44.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291114 062512 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 44.40 360931 71512012 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 59.39 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291445 062912 1130.6107 MILEAGE.OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 59.39 360932 71512012 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN 5,313.44 BRINE COMPUTER REPAIR 291333 39734 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 5,313.44 360933 71512012 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 175.00 KICKBALL T- SHIRTS 291194 83709 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 175.00 360934 71612012 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 291168 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 360935 71512012 130499 GIFFT, PATRICK 21.65 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291446 062912 1623.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TENNIS INSTRUCTION 21.65 360936 71512012 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 169.93 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00001575 291041 742 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 169.93 360937 71512012 101103 GRAINGER 11.07 BATTERIES 00001538 291042 9854076164 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 10 7/5/2012 - 7/512012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 42.41 COIL CLEANERS 00001538 291042 9854076164 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 141.84 AUTO DRAIN W /FLOAT 00001528 291236 9849779203 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 195.32 360938 71512012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 194.50 291106 141016 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 599.75 291137 141025 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 228.50 291294 141095 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,022.75 360939 71512012 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 168.17 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291484 062912 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 168.17 360940 71512012 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 12,700.00 3RD QTR RETAINER 291195 062712 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 12,700.00 360941 71512012 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 5,868.00 GOLF LESSONS 291275 062812 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 9,114.00 GOLF LESSONS 291275 062812 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 9,419.00 GOLF LESSONS 291275 062812 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 24,401.00 360942 71512012 100155 GRITTON, KAY 35.10 ART WORK SOLD 291169 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.10 360943 71512012 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 176.19 THERMAL PAPER 00007515 291115 108952 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 176.19 360944 7/5/2012 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS - 12,074.16 PREMIUM 291334 40675147 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,216.10 PREMIUM 291335 40675024 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 13,290.26 360945 715/2012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 291237 023946 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 291336 023964 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 306.24 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/5/2012 - 715/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 360946 71512012 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR-SERVICES 291276 OB20815 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,475.08 �I 360947 71512012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page - 11 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,650.50 291295 606458 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,650.50 360948 71512012 103302 HONEYWELL CONCERT BAND 40.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/8/12 291077 062512 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 40.00 360949 71512012 122565 HYSER, TIMOTHY 437.75 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING" 291427 062912 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 437.75 J 360950 71512012 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 277.50 VFD SERVICE 00001666 291447 5199 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL` SERVICES WELL HOUSES 277.50 _ 360951 71512012 129508. IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 3,886.25 MAIL WATER BILLS 291238 64929 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES- GENERAL (BILLING) 555.12 MAIL LATE NOTICES 291448 64939 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 4,441.37 360952 71512012 121075. JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 52.56 TOILET SERVICE 00001579-291043 54413 1642.6103 PROFESSI INAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 91.86 00001578 291044' 54411 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 52.56 00001577 291045 54410 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 52.56 , 00001576 291046 54409 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 79.10 TOILET SERVICE 291239 54408 5430.6182 e RUBBISH REMOVAL' is . RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 79.10 291240 54407 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 407.74 i 360953 71512012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1 2,788.95 291103 1819882 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER - 50TH ST SELLING 32.55 291296 1819926 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD: MIX '50TH ST SELLING 78.80 291297 1819928 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX . VERNON SELLING - 6,647.55 291298 1819927 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS, 661-13 BEER VERNON SELLING 173.25 291360 1819943 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 73.65 291361: 1819944 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING . 11,455.47 291362 1819942 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS.SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 227.87 Council Check Register 291138 1321014 5862.5513 7/5/2012 - 7/5/2012 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 33.00 291363 1819940 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 21,283.22 VERNON SELLING 291299 1330764 360954 715/2012 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 291364 455.75 HEADS 00006235 291196 61686145 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 455.75 1330754 5842.5513 2,811.46 360956 715/2012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 227.87 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 291138 1321014 5862.5513 118.04 YORK SELLING 291139 1321013 5862.5513 7.19- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 291140 537164 5862.5512 2,841.25 VERNON SELLING 291299 1330764 5862.5513 20.99 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 291364 1330762 5842.5513 2,861.92 BOTH ST SELLING 291365 1330754 5842.5513 2,811.46 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 291366 1330758 5842.5513 1,961.40 YORK SELLING 291367 1330761 5842.5513 1.12 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 291368 1330745 5842.5513 476.37 VERNON SELLING 291369 1330772 5862.5512 711.88 291370 1330771 5862.5512 1,819.32 291371 1330769 5862.5513 990.09 291372 1330773 5862.5513 20.99 291373 1330774 5862.5513 264.08 291374 1330768 5862.5515 196.49 291375 1330752 5822.5512 62.74 291376 1330749 5822.5515 2,087.88 291377 1330748 5822.5512 8,201.81 - 291378 1330756 5842.5512 .19 291379 1330747 5842.5512 161.81 291380 1330755 5842.5512 156.85 291381 1330757 5842.5515 1,230.55 291382 1330760 5842.5512 516.12 291383 1330763 5842.5512 11.45- 291384 535057 5862.5513 8.33- 291385 535056 5862.5513 26.26- 291386 534584 5862.5513 27,687.99 360957 715/2012 123696 JOHNSTON, TORI 33.80 ART WORK SOLD 291170 062612 5101.4413 33.80 360958 71512012 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page - 12 Business Unit YORK SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 13 7/5/2012 — 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 122.70 VACUUM REPAIR 291449 2089 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 122.70 360959 71512012 130494 JORDAN, CHRISTINA 24.00 TWINS TRIP REFUND 291337 062812 1600.4390.33 WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 24.00 360960 71512012 126953 KIMM, RYAN 150.00 PREFORM FARMERS MARKET 7/12/12 291083 062512 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 360961 71512012 104979 KOCON, ED 186.48 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291338 062912 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 186.48 360962 7/5/2012 127146 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC. 132.52 PLAYGROUND PARTS 00001375 291241 C10905 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 132.52 360963 715/2012 130497 LIEBER, LAUREN 100.00 ROOM CANCELLATION REFUND 291339 062912 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 100.00 360964 71512012 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 272.89 AED PAD, BATTERY 00005434 291450 LL -4300 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 272.89 360965 7/5/2012 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 140.00 291387 21176 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 140.00 360966 715/2012 101792 LOBE -TECH 591.90 GAS 00006142 291197 2065232 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,258.77 DIESEL 00006143 291198 2065231 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 868.29 GAS 00006142 291199 2065230 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 2,718.96 360967 7/512012 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,154.92 291388 134259 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,154.92 360968 7/512012 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 14 715/2012 -7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,678.80 BLADES, BITS 00001600 291047 8412 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1,678.80 360969 71512012 130484 MARK'S CONCESSION REPAIR LLC 175.17 POPCORN POPPER CLEANING 291092 739 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS 175.17 360970 7/512012 130498 MARTIN, DANIEL 21.65 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291451 062912 1623.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TENNIS INSTRUCTION 21.65 360971 7/5/2012 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 229.31 OXYGEN 00003649 291452 04952234 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 225.13 OXYGEN 00003649 291453 04946186 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 454.44 360972 71612012 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/10/12 291079 062512 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 360973 71512012 125941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 1,396.02. REPLACED MOTOR 291277 2573910 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 986.11 REPLACED FUSES 291278 2573931 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 416.94 BELT REPLACEMENT 291340 2574067 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 3,566.32 A/C REPLACEMENT 291341 2573847 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 6,365.39 360974 71512012 130163 MEERSMAN, NICO 136.00 CLASS REFUND 291200 062712 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 136.00 360975 7/512012 101483 MENARDS 32.06 HARDWARE 00001558 291048 86461 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 51.60 BUILDING SUPPLIES 00008059 291049 83754 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 58.73 PAINT 00006364 291242 89049 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 142.39 360976 715/2012 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 358.78 FIELD PAINT 00001552 291050 142105 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 358.78 360977 71612012 104650 MICRO CENTER :. R55CKREG LOG20000 = CITY OF EDINA 629430 -2860 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE Council Check Register 386.00 7/5/2012 — 715/2012 Check # Date Amount Suppliers Explanation PO # 'Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 75.76 DVDS, FLASH DRIVES 00003033 291093 3943950 1400.6160 DATA,PROCESSING _ 75.76 ON LINE TRAINING 00006024 291342 "- 6281201 5410.6104 360978 71512012 GOLF ADMINISTRATION 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 60.00 1,470.00 INSTALL CURBSTOP 00001663.- 291454 34112 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 360981 1,470.00 120301 , MINNESOTA MULCH & SOIL 360979 71512012 106193 , MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 7/312012 13:07:35 Page - 15 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 168.88 360986 71512012 100898- MINVALCO 15.07 V- BELTS 00005063 291202 843033 5430.6406 GENERAL- SUPPLIES 15.07 360987 71512012 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS 40.00 REI PERMIT 291456 062812 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.00 REI PERMIT 291457 062712 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING 386.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT CLASS' 291051 629430 -2860 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 386.00 - 360980 71512012 100122 MINNESOTA LICENSED BEVERAGE AS 60.00 ON LINE TRAINING 00006024 291342 "- 6281201 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 60.00 360981 71512012 120301 , MINNESOTA MULCH & SOIL 1,210.51 MULCH 291201 011141 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,210.51 360982 7/5/2012 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 900.96. ASPHALT EMULSION 00005429 291455 64672 1314.6519 ROAD OIL. STREET RENOVATION 900.96 360983 71512012 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL , 528.86 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS' 291094 18675 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS ' 528.86 360984 71512012 120925 MINNESOTA.SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATIO 175.00 APCO /MSA/NENA CONFERENCE 291243 12 -0224 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 175.00 _ 360985 71512012 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 168:88 PRINTING FOR VET MEMORIAL 00007142 291279 11586 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 168.88 360986 71512012 100898- MINVALCO 15.07 V- BELTS 00005063 291202 843033 5430.6406 GENERAL- SUPPLIES 15.07 360987 71512012 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS 40.00 REI PERMIT 291456 062812 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.00 REI PERMIT 291457 062712 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 NAME PLATES 291244 062612 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 360994 715/2012 100763 NEOPOST USA INC. Council Check Register. RATE & STRUCTURE INSURANCE 291052 13490591 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 38.62 7/5/2012 - 7/5/2012 119145 NIEBRES, CAROLINA Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 80.00 360988 71512012 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 180.22 BUSINESS CARDS 00003809 291203 5878 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 180.22 360989 71512012 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 643.75 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 291424 062912 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 643.75 360990 71512012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 20.90 BUSHINGS 00006234 291204 851309 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 521.62 SPINDLE 00006232 291205 850866 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 401.88 HEADS 00005233 291206 851181 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 9.65 DEMO HEAD 00006233 291207 851181 -02 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 28.29 COUPLERS 00006236 291208 851449 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 341.09 FUEL PUMP 00006239 291209 851996 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 303.80 HEADS 00006233 291210 851181 -03 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 125.47 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002055 291343 851108-01 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS 58.84 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002055 291344 853832 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,811.54 360991 71512012 124571 MURPHY, WENDY 8.11 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 291345 062912 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 94.01 FRUIT 291345 062912 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 102.12 360992 71512012 100916 MUZAK LLC 239.54 MUSIC SERVICE 291346 AB26566 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 239.54 360993 71512012 128039 NAMEPLATE SERVICES 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page - 16 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE &.GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 19.90 NAME PLATES 291244 062612 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19.90 360994 715/2012 100763 NEOPOST USA INC. 38.62 RATE & STRUCTURE INSURANCE 291052 13490591 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 38.62 360995 715/2012 119145 NIEBRES, CAROLINA 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 291171 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 CITY OF EDINA 713/2012 13:07:35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 7/5/2012 -7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 360996 7/512012 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 13.50 INK 00009143 291053 42179402 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 101.58 PAPER, KARAT W/C CRAYON SETS 00009050 291054 42449401 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 115.08 360997 71512012 105575 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO. INC 159.03 RECORD & RECEIPT BOOK 291055 25475 1450.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ANIMAL CONTROL 159.03 360998 71512012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 74.43 PAPER 00008054 291056 613459069001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 9.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00006034 291245 1478336089 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 84.08 360999 71512012 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 23.83 291280 W12040650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.83 291280 W12040660 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.66 291280 W12040650 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 47.66 291280 W12040650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.49 291280 W12040650 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 92.19 291280 W12040650 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 95.32 291280 W12040650 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 95.32 291280 W12040650 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 119.15 291280 W12040650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 142.98 291280 W12040650 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 163.17 291280 W12040650 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE • 209.45 291280 W12040650 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 209.46 291280 W12040650 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 333.62 291280 W12040650 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 371.29 291281 W12040656 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.80 291282 W12050649 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.80 291282 W12050649 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.60 291282 W12050649 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 47.60 291282 W12050649 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.40 291282 W12050649 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 92.10 291282 W12050649 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 95.20 291282 W12050649 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 95.20 291282 W12050649 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 119.00 291282 W12050649 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 142.80 291282 W12050649 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 162.99 291282 W12050649 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 18 7/5/2012 -7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 209.20 291282 W12050649 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 209.20 291282 W12050649 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 333.20 291282 W12050649 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 370.80 291283 W12050655 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 4,090.31 361000 715/2012 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 291172 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 361001 71512012 101659 ORION PEST CONTROL 134.16 PEST CONTROL 291095 75081015 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 134.16 361002 71512012 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 141.10 COOKIES 291284 81479120 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 141.10 361003 71512012 130454 OVEN HEARTH WHOLESALE BAKERY 34.36 BUNS 291347 317374 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 34.36 361004 71512012 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 23.00 ARTWORK SOLD 291173 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 23.00 361005 71512012 102440 PASS, GRACE 45.50 ART WORK SOLD 291174 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 45.50 361006 71512012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 121.25 291141 8355391 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,681.43 291142 8355848 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,597.44 291143 8355840 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.25 291300 8355389 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,293.82 291301 8355843 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .16 291302 8349097 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 91.25 291389 8355859 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,906.60 361007 71512012 119008 PCI ROADS 288.08 HYDRANT RENTAL FEE 291116 062612 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/5/2012 -7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 291404 15657 361012 7/6/2012 130174 PIONEER ATHLETICS 2,157.50 FIELD PAINT 00001550 291057 INV444599 2,157.50 361013 71612012 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 190.00 BRM PERMIT #6171000 291058 062012 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 288.08 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 361008 715/2012 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 690.71 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 291246 75329871 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 131.99 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 291285 69926093 292.06 291390 75329872 379.96 291391 75329880 747.06 291392 75329882 204.30 291393 73227885 2,446.08 361009 71512012 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 2,750.00 MULCH AT CITY HALL 00001624 291247 163 2,750.00 361010 715/2012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 176.78 291144 2256933 1,434.77 291303 2263397 602.08 291304 2263391 1,091.40 291305 2263396 694.13 291394 2263392 1,853.83 291395 2263393 1,616.34 291396 2263394 840.37 291397 2263389 240.00 291398 2261590 347.67 291399 2263395 1.12 291400 2263387 74.24- 291401 3482580 22.04- 291402 3484366 41.12- 291403 3484364 8,761.09 361011 71512012 144176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 291404 15657 361012 7/6/2012 130174 PIONEER ATHLETICS 2,157.50 FIELD PAINT 00001550 291057 INV444599 2,157.50 361013 71612012 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 190.00 BRM PERMIT #6171000 291058 062012 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5822.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5515 1642.6544 1550.6235 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page - 19 Business Unit GRILL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 50TH ST SELLING CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING LINE MARKING POWDER POSTAGE FIELD MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/5/2012 - 715/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 190.00 361014 71512012 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 184.02 CUP CUTTERS 00006489 291211 CD1572749 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page- 20 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL VANVALKENBURG TENNIS INSTRUCTION PLAYGROUND & THEATER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 184.02 361015 71512012 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 695.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 291426 062912 4077.6103 695.25 361016 71512012 108672 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF M 400.00 RANGE USE 291059 0470001024. 1400.6104 400.00 361017 715/2012 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. 27.50 291405 18588 5862.5515 27.50 361018 715/2012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 23.94 DISPOSABLE GLOVES 291117 002089 5421.6406 59.81 FOOD 291118 008187 4075.5510 6.95 101:-9350 291119 061912 1623.6406 29.87 101 = ""9350 291348 CANDY -6/12 1624.6406 120.57 361019 715/2012 103278 SCHATTAUER, JIM 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/12/12 291082 062512 5760.6136 200.00 361020 71512012 119799 SCHIMET2; SCOTT - 206.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 291423 062912 4077.6103 206.00 361021 71512012 127049 SCHNEIDER, KATHERINE 320.00 FITNESS TRAINING 291212 062512 1470.6104 320.00 361022 71512012 127490 SCULLY, PAT 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 291175 062612 5101.4413 26.00 361023 715/2012 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page- 20 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL VANVALKENBURG TENNIS INSTRUCTION PLAYGROUND & THEATER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7/5/2012 -7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 334.03 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 291176 062712 5111.6406 334.03 361024 71512012 130486 SHEA, JANET 61.00 GRAPE ESCAPE TRIP REFUND 291084 062512 1628A392.07 61.00 361025 7/5/2012 127619 SIEGEL, LISA 55.15 ART WORK SOLD 291177 062612 5101.4413 55.15 361026 71512012 101000 SIR SPEEDY 295.51 BUSINESS CARDS 291060 72898 1550.6406 - 295.51 361027 71512012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,089.00 291145 1787611 5862.5513 546.50 291146 1787614 5862.5513 1,805.50 291306 1833442 5862.5512 3,304.21 291307 1833441 5862.5512 2,388.08 291308 1787625 5862.5513 1,083.00 291309 1827718 5862.5513 1,805.50 291310 1833444 5842.5512 4,096.74 291311 1833443 5842.5512 1,606.08 291312 1787623 5822.5513 633.00 291406 1827717 5842.5513 2,936.29 291407 1787629 5842.5513 8.00- 291408 1779861 5862.5513 946.36 291409 1833439 5822.5512 22,232.26 361028 71512012 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 3,231.60 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 291458 1207 05508.1705 3,231.60 361029 71512012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 91.54 PLUMBING REPAIRS 291096 52562993.001 1551.6180 91.54 361030 71612012 102170 STAR OF THE NORTH CONCERT BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/11/12 291081 062512 5760.6136 100.00 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR TRIPS ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/312012 13:07:35 Page - 21 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONTRACTED REPAIRS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM CITY HALL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/312012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 22 7/5/2012 — 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 361031 7/5/2012 101016 STREICHERS 1,439.81 AMMO 291061 1938106 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,439.81 361032 715/2012 101765 STROH, STEVE 29.87 UNIFORM PURCHASE 291248 062812 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 29.87 361033 715/2012 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 41.97 PUBLISH NOTICE 291098 1384315 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 20.98 AD FOR BIDS 291099 1384316 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 62.95 361034 71512012 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 1,722.28 FERTILIZER 291213 5013 -RGR 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,722.28 361035 71612012 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 119.79 PAINT 291214 8128 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,642.98 FERTILIZER 00006231 291215 8108 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,762.77 361036 71512012 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 35.00 PHONE.SERVICE REPLACEMENT 291286 32612 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 35.00 361037 7/512012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 940.00 291107 003120 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 782.00 291147 003166 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,722.00 361038 715/2012 127938 SWENSON, ANN 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 291179 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 361039 71512012 116868 SWENSON, SUSAN 71.50 ART WORK SOLD 291178 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 71.50 361040 71512012 108509 TAFFEE, MARY 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 291180 062612 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 23 7/5/2012 -7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 29.25 361041 71512012 101027 - TARGET BANK 304.75 X- XXX -XX9 -840 291249 6112 SUPPLIES 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 304.75 361042 71512012 102471 THOLEN, BRIAN 47.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 291250 062512 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE1, POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 47.98 361043 71512012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 445.00 291251 00773348 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 197.40 291313 698243 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX - VERNON SELLING 6,078.78 291314 698242 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 31.10 291410 698667 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 438.00- 291411 698668 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 7,190.28 . 361044 71512012 i 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 502.32 WALL PLATE REPAIRED 291097 632448 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 502.32 361045 71512012 103331 TILSNER, DONNA - 36.70 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 291349, 062812 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 326.80 JAN -JUNE 2012 MILEAGE 291350 062912 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE' PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 363.50 361046 71512012 103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN 29.25 ARTWORK SOLD 291181 062621 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 361047 71512012 101042 TRIARCO 289.30 CRAFT SUPPLIES;FOR PLAYGROUNMOD7134 291120 928585 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND& THEATER " 53.21 TIE DYE -KITS 00007134. 291121 930448 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 342.51 361048 71512012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 806.07 CONTROLLER 00006218 291216 0127774 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS+ MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 485.28 TINE HOLDERS 291217 T121770 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 219.75 RELAYS, BLADES 00006226 291218 0127867 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,511.10 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/512012 - 7/5/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 361049 71512012 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 90.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 291252 101931417 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 90.00 361050 71512012 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 605.98 SEED 00006243 291219 28008 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 605.98 361051 71512012 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 249.55 CUPS 291253 239590 -01 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,562.53 TISSUE, LINERS, TOWELS 291254 239590-00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.02 SPOONS, TISSUE 291351 235556-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 458.33 LIQUOR BAGS 291351 235556 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 2,336.43 361052 71512012 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 244.84 CART TOP PARTS 00006237 291220 61803 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 121.44 SOLENOID, SWITCH 00006232 291221 61760 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 605.00 RENTAL CARTS 291255 61892 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 315.00 RENTAL CARTS 291256 62029 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 1,286.28 361053 71512012 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 101.48 CONTACT & CURRENT TESTER 00001545 291062 6445397 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 127.96 RECEPTICLE COVERS 00001545 291062 6445397 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 229.44 361054 71512012 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 880.19 CONCESSION PRODUCT 291287 33977654 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 474.24 291288 33997912 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,511.02 291289 34007602 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,865.45 361055 715/2012 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 397.00 PC61 PORT AUTHORITY TEES 291063 50176 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 397.00 361056 71512012 101075 WEIGLE, SUE 326.90 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291100 JAN -JUNE 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 326.90 361057 71512012 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Page - 24 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF CARS GOLF CARS GOLF CARS GOLF CARS WELL HOUSES CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 25 7/5/2012 - 715/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 682.34 GAS PUMP REPAIR 291222 44193 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 682.34 361058 71512012 103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO 548.00 DOOR REPAIR 291352 SP123302 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 548.00 _ 361059 71512012 130487 WHEELOCK, PATRICIA 61.00 GRAPE ESCAPE TRIP REFUND 291085 062512 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 61.00 361060 7/512012 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 55.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291122 062712 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 55.50 361061 71512012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,437.45 291315 303177 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,649.70 291316 303070 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 773.20 291317 303170 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,860.35 361062 71512012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 13.44 291108 413834 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 162.24 291148 413149 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,111.20 291318 414666 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,405.76 291319 414668 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.44 291412 413835 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 206.99 291413 414664 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,146.89 291414 414667 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.12- 291415 58230 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 98.24- 291416 57754 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,840.60 361063 71512012 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 1,409.32 FERTILIZER, FUNGICIDE 00002054 291353 000057946995 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,409.32 361064 71512012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,540.25 291149 760408 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 28.10 291150 765669 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7,388.11 291151 765671 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 160.00 291162 765672 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register 715/2012 - 7/5/2012 Page - 26 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 269.90 291153 765677 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,084.13 291154 765678 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,773.80 291155 765675 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,382.83 291156 765676 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,232.82 291320 765670 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 950.27 291417 765673 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 64.00- 291418 859887 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.00- 291419 861047 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.05- 291420 861291 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26,641.16 361065 715/2012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 5,908.35 291109 917856 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 240.00 291110 917857 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 120.00 291157 916855 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,514.85 291158 916853 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 107.70 291159 916854 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 160.00 291160 917231 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,245.60 291161 917230 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 529.30 291257 916607 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 668.60 291421 920089 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 15,494.40 361067 71512012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51.33 51- 6541084 -2 291064 329874762 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17.14 51- 9770163 -6 291065 329924107 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 33.45 51- 8997917 -7 291066 329913862 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 99.27 51- 8526048 -8 291067 329902189 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 69.43 51- 9770164 -7 291068 329927599 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 22.41 51- 0160483 -1 291069 329773560 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 55.90 51- 4420190 -3 291070 329834925 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 32.59 51- 0223133 -2 291071 329775247 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 294.79 51- 8324712 -5 291072 329900851 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.68 51- 6892224 -5 291073 329882380 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.94 51- 0194596 -8 291074 329773659 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 171.23 51- 60501842 291075 329869717 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 83.40 51- 0193479 -4 291123 329934640 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 2,070.98 51- 9011854 -4 291124 330066645 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 103.07 51- 9608462 -5 291125 330085565 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 34.97 51- 9422326 -6 291126 330072760 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 144.89 51- 8987646 -8 291127 330066954 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 713/2012 13:07:35 Council Check Register Page - 27 7/5/2012 - 71512012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 125.11 51- 9337452 -8 291128 330071150 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER . STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 7,491.26 51- 9603061 -0 291129 330073293 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING _- 46.73 51- 8976004 -9 291130 330064983 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 180.72 51- 6223269 -1 291258 330025807 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 35.15 51- 8102668 -0 291259 330235497 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,364.36 51- 6955679 -8 291260 330217633 1551.6185 LIGHT &,POWER CITY HALL GENERAL - 63.82 51 -6692497 -0 291261 330215656 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER` CIVILIAN DEFENSE 27,840.70 51- 4621797 -2 291262 330176321 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR -. 3,149.99 51- 4159265 -8 291290 329832457 7411.6165 LIGHT & POWER PSTFOCCUPANCY 51,654.31 361068 7/5/2012 130480 XSPORTS 252.83 KWIK FLAGS 291076 36 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA'ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 252.83 361069 71512012 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 12,894.80 DIESEL FUEL 00005975 291459 478597 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,281.60 UNLEADED FUEL 00005975 291460 497322 1553.6581 GASOLINE _ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 12,574.80 DIESEL FUEL 00005975 291461 497310 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37;751.20 361070 7/512012 120099 Z WINES USA;LLC 592.00 291422 11189 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 592.00 361071 71512012 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 110.63 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 291263 54058689 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 127.99 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 291354 54068688 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS .238:62 361072 715/2012 101091 ZIEGLERINC 4,975.00 GENERATOR 291101 SW050183069 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS 4,975.00 570,968.79 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 570,968.79 Total Payments 570,968.79 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/3/2012 13:08:32 Council Cheek Summary Page - 1 7/512012 - 7/5/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 255,429.82 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 561.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 13,597.99 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 9,195.53 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,023.23 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 365.01 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 13,123.89 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 61,353.19 05500 ICE ARENA_ FUND 12,139.48 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 3,323.83 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,562.31 05800 LIQUOR FUND 174,765.42 05900 UTILITY FUND 14.450.39. 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 927.71 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,149.99 Report Totals 570,968.79 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll ies prid procedure SIle �, R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check ,# Date - Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 361073 711212012, 128159 4ACEPRODUCTIONS. 515.00 SAFETY CAMP PRESENTATION 291828 070512 1600.4390, 515.00 361074 7/1212012 100613 AAA 1,639.08 TE PLATES 291964 070512 1553.6260 1,639.08 361075 7/12/2012 - 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 829'.921 US TEMP 291562 , 35798791 5910.6103 600.21 UB TEMP 292077 35822216 5910.6103 1,430.13 361076 711212012 102971 -ACE ICE COMPANY 166.00 291466 1586132 5842.5515 51.60 291467 1586130 5822.5515 143.60 291680 1586131 5862.5515 66.00 292019 1587045 5421.6406 157.20 292085 1587451 5842.5515 44.40 292086 1587445 5822.5515 206.00. 292087 1587444 5862.5515 100.40 292088 1588690 5862.5515 76.40 292089 1588691 5842.5515 1,011.60 361077 711212012 105571 ADVANTAGE PAPER 76.95 FOAM CUPS 291829 442872 1628.6406 76.95 361078 7/12/2012 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 261.75 SCOREBOARD REPAIR 00001573, 292065 35486 1642.6180 261.75 361079 711212012 124765 AIR MECHANICAL-INC. 200.32 PERMIT REFUND -, 291965 ED112736 1495.4112 200.32 361080 7112/2012 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 38,958.20 RECYCLING 292078 2911550 5952.6183 39,958.20 361081 711212012 127$65, AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY Subledger Account Description SAFETY CAMP LICENSES & PERMITS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST -OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page- 1 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL (BILLING) YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL. SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS RECYCLING CHARGES. ; RECYCLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/1012012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 2 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5.53 LENS 00005442 291782 AFS- 221840002 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 174.01 PIGGYBACKS, DEF FLUID 00005368 291783 AFS- 221810013 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.54 361082 711212012 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 95.41 291966 063012 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 129.96 291966 063012 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 135.48 291966 063012 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 174.93 291966 063012 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 199.32 291966 063012 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 249.78 291966 063012 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 386.33 291966 063012 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,371.21 361083 711212012 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 103.34 COPIER PAPER 291563 10328573 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 103.34 361084 711212012 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 873.22 FOOD 291564 1760698 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 873.22 361085 711212012 102566 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC 59.31 ANTENNA CABLE 291967 221554 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 59.31 361086 711212012 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 6,500.00 FLOWRIDER CONSTRUCTION MGT 291784 APPL #1 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 32,238.63 291785 APPL #4 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 8,500.00 292064 #1 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 47,238.63 361087 711212012 103660 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 22.34 COFFEE 291565 1026387 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 22.34. 361088 711212012 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 278.94 BACKRACK 00005431 291507 10101874 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 278.94 361089 711212012 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 291786 070112 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 711012012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 3 7/1212012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 33.28 291786 070112 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 44.71 291786 070112 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 56.55 291786 070112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 66.29 291786 070112 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.66 291786 070112 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 73.92 291786 070112 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 90.08 291786 070112 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 99.35 291786 070112 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 198.28 291786 070112 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 207.79 291786 070112 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 211.25 291786 070112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 217.25 291786 070112 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 233.31 291786 070112 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 233.32 291786 070112 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 309.03 291786 070112 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 399.03 291786 070112 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 539.76 291786 070112 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 646.03 291786 070112 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3.760.89 361090 711212012 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON 1 160.26 ALTERNATOR 00005363 291508 151411 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 160.26 361091 711212012 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 70.00 SQUAD REPAIRS 291968 3742 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 361092 711212012 100638 BACHMAN'S 686.35 TREES 00006238 291509 38931/1 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 686.35 361093 7112/2012 106217 BANIA JR., DON 400.00 SAFETY CAMP SPEAKER 291830 070512 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 400.00 361094 7112/2012 100642 BANNERS TO GO 172.44 BALLFIELD SIGNS 00005346 291831 34216 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 172.44 361096 711212012 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3.186.50 LIVING STREETS PROJECT 291566 23271243.00.1 01391.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN LIVING STREETS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 4 7/12/2012 - 7/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,186.50 361096 711212012 102346 BEARCOM 129.15 WALKIE TALKIE RENTAL 291832 ORDER #31895984 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 129.15 361097 711212012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 109.65 291468 74141000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,069.50 291469 74140900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.55 291470 74140700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 93.60 291471 74140600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 194.20 291472 86979400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 54.24 291473 86979500 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 518.39 291474 6206300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 228.46 291475 86979600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 803.00 291681 74140800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 36.55 292090 74228700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 41.00 292091 74228600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 747.05 292092 74228500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 61.07 292093 87005100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,958.26 361098 711212012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 134.44 CD DISCS, DVD LABELS 00003034 291969 WO- 780843 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 134.44 361099 7112/2012 130569 BINTNER, ROSS - 133.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291970 070312 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 133.20 361100 711212012 125209 BISEK, KATIE 600.00 TECHNOLOGY REIMBURSEMENT 291833 070512 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 600.00 361101 711212012 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 20,250.00 REMOVEIINSTALL BLACKTOP 00001243 291834 19579 47079.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ROSLAND PK PATHWAY 20,250.00 361102 7/12/2012 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 40.38 UNIFORM PURCHASE 291567 070212 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 40.38 CITY OF EDINA 7 /10 /20iz 15:11:19 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 711212012 77/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation, PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger "Account Description Business Unit 361103 711212012 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 21.90 PLAYGROUND FIRST AID SUPPLIES00007140 291510 80811489 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND '& THEATER _ 39.60 PLAYGROUND FIRST AID, SUPPLIES00007140 291511 80811490 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER - 61.50 361104 711212012 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS, 63.00 SEAT 00005433 291512 642648 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,145.08 SPRINGS, PINS, U -BOLTS 00005355 291513 643455 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 154.87 WHEEL ASSEMBLY 00005190 291514 644000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 279.53 COMPRESSOR 00005367-29-1787 647318 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 398.57 HUB ASSEMBLY 00005444 291835 647565 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.04 ACCUMULATOR 00005391 291971 648094 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.99 GASKET. 00005391 291972 648518 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.77 . HOSE ASSEMBLY 00005391 291973 .!648092X1 1553.6530 REPAIRPARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,177.85 361105 _ 711212012 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,924.00 SOIL BORING/TESTING 000071.22 291515 353879 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. PATHS & HARD SURFACE 588.00 MATERIALS TESTING 291568 353231 01383.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -383 W44THST 644.00 291569 353230: 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 747.00 291570 353871 01387.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD 1,059.25 291571 353872 01386.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD 1,308.00 291572 353869 01385.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD 1,776.25 291573 353870 .01388.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 8.046.50 361106 711212012 104470 BRIDGES_ TONE GOLF,INC. 90.49 GOLF BALLS 291636 1001987054- 5440.5511 COSMOF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 883.78 GOLF BALLS 291637 1001983166' 5440:5511 COST OF GOODS `- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 974.27 361107 711212012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 30:00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 292150 .070912 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30.00 361108 7112/2012 102149, CALLAWAY GOLF . . 1,122.00 MERCHANDISE, 292020 923660443. 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP-RETAIL SALES 111.75 292021 923570413 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 111.75 292022 923624338 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,122.00 361109 7112/2012 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 9,656.00 LEGAL 291788 2851 -000G -5112 1195.6131 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5515 5430.5514 5822.5514 5842.5513 1500.6103 1500.6103 1550.6406 1550.6406 1551.6406 1552.6188 7411.6188 7410.6103 1550.6188 4090.6188 5911.6188 1628.6188 1470.6188 5841.6188 5821.6188 1622.6188 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page- 6 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE WELL PUMPS SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY SKATING & HOCKEY 9,656.00 361110 711212012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,424.15 291476 117787 16.75 291477 117786 5,563.50 291682 00010282 63.25 291683 00010283 103.00 292094 120828 1,337.45 292095 00010281 8,508.10 361111 7112/2012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 825.66 292096 93746 825.66 361112 711212012 129923 CAWLEY 59.67 NAME BADGES 291574 V106221 13.51 NAME BADGES 291575 V106530 73.18 361113 7112/2012 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 207.39 ENVELOPES 291576 70351 163.52 ENVELOPES 291577 70350 370.91 361114 711212012 130533 CENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS 2,170.36 MULCH 00001561 291836 21453 2,170.36 361115 711212012 123898 CENTURYLINK 121.41 952 831 -0024 291578 0024 -6/12 83.78 952 941 -1019 291789 1019 -6/12 107.62 952 926 -7398 291790 7398 -6/12 330.05 952 927 -8861 291791 8861 -6/12 55.86 952 929 -0297 291792 0297 -6112 56.10 291837 0146 -6/12 58.80 291837 0146 -6/12 117.67 291837 0146 -6/12 121.49 291837 0146 -6/12 140.56 291837 0146 -6/12 166.56 291837 0146 -6/12 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5515 5430.5514 5822.5514 5842.5513 1500.6103 1500.6103 1550.6406 1550.6406 1551.6406 1552.6188 7411.6188 7410.6103 1550.6188 4090.6188 5911.6188 1628.6188 1470.6188 5841.6188 5821.6188 1622.6188 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page- 6 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE WELL PUMPS SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY SKATING & HOCKEY 361116 711212012 CITY OF EDINA 130029 CHEMPOINT.COM R55CKREG LOG20000 2,311.50 Council Check Register 291516 NA00231021 1552.6186 7/1212012 - 711212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 170.23 291837 0146 -6/12 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 235.46. 291837 0146 -6/12 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 267.13 291837 0146 -6/12 5932.6188 TELEPHONE 1.766.47 291837 0146 -6/12 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 361116 711212012 130029 CHEMPOINT.COM 2,311.50 ANTIFREEZE 00001587 291516 NA00231021 1552.6186 2,311.50 361117 7112/2012 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 273.75 291478 476050 5822.5514 665.45 291684 476411 5862.5514 939.20 361118 711212012 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 8,885.00 PH/CRI SERVICES 291838 PH1067 4204.6103 8,885.00 361119 711212012 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7 /16/12 291624 070112 5760.6136 150.00 361120 7/1212012 122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 CITY MAP ADVERTISING 291579 COM1174 5822.6122 200.00 CITY MAP ADVERTISING 291579 COM1174 5842.6122 200.00 CITY MAP ADVERTISING 291579 COM1174 5862.6122 600.00 361121 711212012 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 149.20 291685 1136 5822.5514 149.20 361122 7112/2012 120433 COMCAST 82.46 8772 10 614 0165667 292023 165667 -6/12 5424.6406 96.12 8772 10 614 0177449 292024 177449-6/12 5420.6188 90.44 8772 10 614 0164959 292025 164959 -6/12 5430.6188 269.02 361123 7112/2012 101704 COOK, BARBARA 96.80 PROGRAM COORDINATOR 291580 12 -1601 1629.6103 96.80 HEAT 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 7 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL STORM SEWER CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RANGE CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ADAPTIVE RECREATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 8 7112/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 361124 711212012 122376 CORPORATE CONNECTION 434.18 SAFETY VESTS 00001440 291839 5426 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 104.01 SAFETY TRAFFIC PANTS 00005435 291840 5552 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 538.19 361125 7112/2012 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 183.31 STAFF T-SHIRTS 291793 15684 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 587.62 SHIRTS, PULLOVERS 291794 15919 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 770.93 361126 711212012 123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE 3,630.00 BRICK REPAIRS 00002056 292013 062912, 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,630.00 361127 7112/2012 130511 CROWD CONTROL WAREHOUSE 145.00 WALL MOUNTED BARRIER 291795 37902 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 145.00 361128 7/1212012 100703 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS 81.80 LATCHES - 00005186 292073 14359 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.80 361129 7112/2012 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 6,873.60 SCADA SUPPORT 00005430 291517 10233 05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM 12,808.00 SCADA SUPPORT 00005430 291518 10237 05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM 19,681.60 361130 711212012 104020 DALCO 117.19 TISSUE 00001454 291581 2479331 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 117.19 361131 711212012 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 113.88 DAIRY 292026 062512 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 113.88 361132 711212012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 19.20 291479 656834 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 2,599.50 291480 656835 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 5,563.35 291686 657718 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,924.35 291687 657720 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEEF? YORK SELLING 43.00 291688 657719 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/1212012 - 7112/2012 - Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No ' Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,478.65 291689 657721 5822.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING " 360.00 292097 658278 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING - 720.00 292098 658291 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 12,708.05 361133 7/1212012 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. '130.12 C- CLAMPS`_ 00005360 291519 704563 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 130.12 361134 711212012' 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY _ 72.93- BAKERY 292027 417282 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL - 86.08 292028 417278 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 64.79 292029 417501 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 93.78 292030. 417500 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 317.58 361135 711212012 129191, DICK 8 RICK'S'AUTO INTERIORS 164.50 SEAT COVER 00005357 291520 27419 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS ` EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 164.50 361136 7/1212012 112663 = DOLLARS & SENSE 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON 291796 29793 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 683.33 DIRECT MAIL COUPON -. 291796 29793 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING - 683.34 DIRECT MAIL COUPON .. - 291796 29793 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,050.00 361137 7/1212012 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 1,078.23 MERCHANDISE 291638 480196 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 114.75 MERCHANDISE 292031 481344 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES _ 1,277.22 292032 481140 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES - 2,470.20 361138 711212012 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO.. 19.33 BULBS 00001589 291582 09071400 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING " 26.85 NUT DRIVERS 00001589 291582 09071400 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 114.56 LIGHT BULBS 00001592 291583 09075500 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET-LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 160.74 361139 7/12/2012 106467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 5,930.00 ART FAIR CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS -292033 070612 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 5,930.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/12/2012 — 711212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 361140 7112/2012 103694 EDINALARM INC. 135.00 WINDOW REPAIR 00001638 291841 74123 1646.6180 135.00 361141 711212012 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 122.34 MANAGEMENT FEE 291797 063012 1550.6155 122.34 361142 711212012 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 20.31 O -RING 00001485 291584 0047623 -IN 5913.6406 20.31 361143 711212012 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 2,313.84 CASTINGS 00001506 291521 RR2839 5932.6536 2,313.84 361144 711212012 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 156.47 BLOCKS 00001497 291974 006377 5932.6520 156.47 361145 7112/2012 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,630.00 JUNE 2012 BILLINGS 292014 070512 1470.6103 6,630.00 361146 7112/2012 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 67.58 HARDWARE 00001548 292066 MNTC2112525 1646.6406 67.58 361147 7/12/2012 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,109.55 CS PARTS 00001484 291522 S01371342.001 5913.6406 1,408.21 METER HORNS 00001483 291523 S01371338.001 5917.6406 3,855.99 METERS 00001665 291524 S01372669.001 5917.6406 941.52 CAMERA 00001501 291525 501373092.001 5913.6406 571.23 CS PARTS 00001504 291842 S01373889.001 5913.6406 111.66 METER RESETTER 00001483 291975 501371338.002 5917.6406 7,998.16 361148 7112/2012 116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 2,254.31 RANGE FILTERS 291585 48011 7412.6406 2,254.31 361149 711212012 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC. Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 10 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR METER REPAIR DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE CITY OF EDINA 7/1012012'15:11:19 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 _ Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description- Business Unit 1,063.46 NOZZLE r 00005449 291976 53263 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES : EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,063.46 361150 7/1212012 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 3,051.06 CAMERA UPGRADES 00001192„ 291526 15370 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,051.06 361151 7112/2012 101475 FOOTJOY - - 54.08 MERCHANDISE 291639 4398075: 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.49 291640 4415885 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,933.97 291641. 4404028 5440.5511 COST.OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 67.50- _ 291642 6920887 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS = PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES _ 1,995.04 361152 711212012 130509 FORM & POUR CEMENT WORKS INC. 961.60 DRIVEWAY REPAIR- 291798 5037 W 56TH 01388.1765.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 961.60 361153 7/12/2012 100764 G & K SERVICES ` 6.44 292079. 063012 5511.6201 LAUNDRY-- ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 59.32 292079 063012 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 98.46 292079 063012 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10414 292079 063012 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 113.38 292079 063012 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING, 198.80 292079. 063012 1553.6201 LAUNDRY, EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 269.80 292079 063012 1301.6201 LAUNDRY - GENERAL MAINTENANCE , 850.44 361154 711212012 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 793.07 MERCHANDISE 292034 11549142 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS:- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 642.81 292035 40591194 5440.5511 COST OF'GOODS--'PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 797.22 292036 40588415 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS. - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,233.10 361155 711212012: 103185 'GERTENS 950.12 PLANTINGS & TREES 00001559 292074 258634 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE . 950.12 - 3.61156 711212012 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,653.90 JUNE 2012 TICKETS `00001670 291843 43185 _ 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,653.90 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/12/2012 - 7112/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 361157 7/1212012 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 503.96 NEW CITY LOGOS 00005280 291527 81392 1553.6585 1552.6406 5913.6406 5913.6610 1646.6406 1301.6406 5420.6530 5761.6406 5912.6406 1322.6406 5862.5513 5822.5513 5440.5511 1641.6530 1260.6406 1301.6180 5760.6136 Subledger Account Deseription ACCESSORIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 12 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING WELL HOUSES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL VERNON SELLING BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP - PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS MOWING ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 503.96 361158 711212012 101103 GRAINGER 71.34 BLADES 00005359 291528 9861606177 194.94 GLOVES 00005333 291529 9852747881 48.74 GLOVES 00005333 291530 9854076172 113.72- CREDIT 00005329 291531 9856772893 142.36 STREET BROOMS 00005430 291586 9864705133 54.92 V- BELTS, OIL 00001607 292037 9864262986 28.15 CORD CONNECTORS 00001585 292038 9855857927 87.07 TUBING KIT 00001585 292038 9855857927 87.07 TUBING KIT 00001585 292038 9855857927 600.87 361159 711212012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 573.50 291690 141221 424.50 292099 141304 998.00 361160 711212012 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 285.12 TEES, INSECT REPELLENT 291587 47315 285.12 361161 711212012 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 38.48 WEED WHIP SPRINGS 00001641 292067 110638 38.48 361162 711212012 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 611.83 CARTRIDGES FOR OCE 00001531 291588 289294 611.83 361163 7112/2012 102210 HAGE CONCRETE WORKS 2,500.00 DRIVEWAY REPAIR 00005729 291799 00001553 2,500.00 361164 7112/2012 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7 /19/12 291628 070112 250.00 361166 7/1212012 106431 HALL, MARY 1552.6406 5913.6406 5913.6610 1646.6406 1301.6406 5420.6530 5761.6406 5912.6406 1322.6406 5862.5513 5822.5513 5440.5511 1641.6530 1260.6406 1301.6180 5760.6136 Subledger Account Deseription ACCESSORIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 12 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING WELL HOUSES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL VERNON SELLING BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP - PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS MOWING ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 13 7/12/2012 — 711212012 _ Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # - Doc No Inv No Account No Sub_ ledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/17/12 291626 070112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 361166 711212012 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 176.19 THERMAL PAPER 00007516 291800 109049 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 176.19 361167 711212012 125270 HARTFORD. = PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,453.64 PREMIUM 292080 5934421 -8 9900.2033.16 LTD -.99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,453.84 - 361168 711212012 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,656.27 CHEMICALS - 00005243 291532 3350640 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,271.97 CHEMICALS 00005243 291533 3351284 5915.6586 WATER:TREATMENT.SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT , - 10,006.01 CHEMICALS 00005243 291534 3353628 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,613.58 CHEMICALS 00005243 292015. 3356676 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 20,547.83 _ 361169 7/1212012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 292039 023967 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD- GRILL 153.12 361170 711212012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 551.78 JUNE 2012, BOOKINGS 292016 1000017951 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 551.78 361171 711212012 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY. TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 292017 1000017863 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 361172 711212012 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 441.54 LOCK REPLACEMENT, KITS 291589 497082 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL F 441.54 361173 711212012 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 3,853.00 COMPUTER REPLACEMENTS- ' 00004342 291861 51407495 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,853.00 d _ - • 361174 711212012 102079 HIGHVIEW. PLUMBING INC 2,050.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00601039 292040 1333V 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION' RICHMOND HILLS PK i �. 3,775.00 SEWERIWATER REPAIR 00001039 292040 13331 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS'PK p 5,825.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 743.50 CITY OF EDINA 606699 7110/2012 15:11:19 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,194.50 Council Check Register 291691 Page - 14 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7/12/2012 — 7/1212012 292100 607269 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 361176 7/1212012 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 711212012 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2,445.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00001070 292041 13332 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 1553.6556 TOOLS 4,725.00 SEWERIWATER REPAIR 00001070 292041 13332 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7,170.00 507.46 361176 711212012 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 7/1212012 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 2,095.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00001045 292042 13334 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES 2,475.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00001045 292042 13334 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 4,570.00 711212012 124330 JEFF MARTIN COMPANY 361177 7/1212012 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 910.00 CRANE TO REMOVE LIGHT POLES 00001603 291535 6562 1321.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 150.00 FARMERS MARKET 7/19/12 291629 070112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 361178 711212012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 743.50 291481 606699 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,194.50 291691 606666 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,728.50 292100 607269 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,666.50 361179 711212012 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 212.67 DRILL 291590 061312 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 294.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 291590 061312 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 507.46 361180 7/1212012 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 50.96 PARTS FOR FENCE 0001085E 291977 154346 01371.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES 50.96 361181 711212012 124330 JEFF MARTIN COMPANY 910.00 CRANE TO REMOVE LIGHT POLES 00001603 291535 6562 1321.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 910.00 361182 711212012 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 23.45 4TH OF JULY SODAS 291978 070512 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 24.42 FLASHLIGHT 291978 070512 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 47.87 361183 7/12/2012 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 9.41 292081 063012 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 30.56 292081 063012 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 15 7/1212012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 36.69 292081 063012 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 38.68 292081 063012 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 56.75 292081 063012 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 71.34 292081 063012 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 73.47 292081 063012 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 109.70 292081 063012 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 426.60 361184 711212012 130567 JESSE TREBIL FOUNDATION SYSTEM 77.80 PERMIT REFUND 291979 ED115299 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 77.80 361185 711212012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 2,902.50 291692 1819941 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,168.11 291693 1819925 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,101.70 291694 1819929 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 38.20 292101 1799882 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 18.00 292102 1819989 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.00 292103 1819973 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,654.30 292104 1819972 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,071.30 292105 1819974 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 66.00 292106 1819982 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 24.55- 292107 1459251 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 17,025.56 361186 711212012 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 15.75 WEED SPRAY 00001551 291844 61727676 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 15.75 361189 711212012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,701.20 291482 1331252 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 177.50 291483 1331255 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 222.50 291484 1331254 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 413.80 291485 1331253 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,243.04 291486 1330746 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 802.14 291487 1330750 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 744.54 291488 1330753 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 666.05 291695 1333164 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 841.81 291696 1333150 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 330.79 291697 1333148 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,250.66 291698 1333147 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 723.31 291699 1330751 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7110/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 16 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 564.94 291700 1333146 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 136.18 291701 1333149 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 783.36 291702 1333154 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.98 291703 1333155 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,618.83 291704 1333157 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 736.31 291705 1333160 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,233.00 291706 1333162 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,742.80 291707 1333159 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 409.63 291708 1333161 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 184.64 291709 1333163 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,139.03 291710 1333165 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10,176.05 291711 1330766 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,256.19 291712 1330767 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24 291713 1332305 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,909.23 291714 1330759 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,958.11 291715 1333151 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 224.71 291716 1333152 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 722.73 291717 1333156 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 417.16 291718 1333158 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,223.99 291719 1333153 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,173.76 291720 1330770 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 748.68 291721 1332306 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 429.58 291722 1332307 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 125.52 291723 1332304 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12.32 291724 1330765 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 791.84 292108 1334870 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 74.24 292109 1334871 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 856.54 292110 1337250 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 844.94 292111 1337251 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 85.92 292112 1337252 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,086.93 292113 1337253 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 288.00 292114 1333677 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 53,116.62 361190 711212012 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 103.86 VACUUM REPAIRS 291980 2650 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 103.86 361191 711212012 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 310.86 BALL BEARINGS 00001602 291845 H102475 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS 310.86 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CITY OF EDINA 7/1012612 15:11:19 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier-/ Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger_ Account Description .. Business Unit 361192 711212012 111018 - KEEPRS INC. 66.47 UNIFORMS.. 00003761 291981 190659- 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 163.16 UNIFORMS - 00003761 291982 190659 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 229.63 361193 7112.12012 120511 KUSKE, BRANDON 69.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 291983 070512 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.95 361194 7112/2012 - 101935 `KUSTOM SIGNALSJNC. 410.17 PROLASER III REPAIR 291984 465287 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 410.17 - 361195 711212012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 603.65 BITS, SCREWS, WASHERS 00005356 291536 9300923792 ,1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS, EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.25 NYLON WASHERS 00001295 291537 9300917619 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS .97.22 HAND CLEANER 00001540 291846 9300905497 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 132.90, NUT &BOLT OPENER,,CARB CLEANER001591 291847 9300920959 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. STREET RENOVATION 852.02 !' 361196 711212012 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 676.88 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 2919857 070612 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES -. POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 676.88 . - 361197 711212012 101314 LITTLE BLIND SPOT, THE 214.55 BLIND REPAIRS 00003813 291538. SNS21516 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL - 214.55 361188 711212012 100858 LOGIS 125.00 291539 34874,34893 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 802.00 291539 34874,34893 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 997.25 291539 34874,34893 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT -. - 6,858.00 291539 34874,34893 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING. ASSESSING - 976.00 291540 34972,35032 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN.- MIS 120.00 291541 35060 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS ' 1,972.00 291541 35060 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 112.99. 291542- 35139. 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 562.85 291542 35139 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,531.70 291542 35139 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 242.00 291543 35251,35274 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 479.80 291543 35251',35274 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 18 7/1212012 — 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Buslness Unit 14,613.05 291543 35251,35274 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 2,008.00 NETWORK SERVICES 291544 35166 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 31,400.64 361199 711212012 101792 LURE -TECH 4,151.91 OIL 00005443 291802 2069014 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,908.39 OIL 00005443 291803 2069019 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7,060.30 361200 711212012 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 443.84 HOSE REEL, SCROLL 00005193 291545 2123706 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 443.84 361201 711212012 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 107.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291804 070312 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 107.12 361202 7/12/2012 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 800.00 PERSONNEL ASSESSMENTS 291986 7943 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 400.00 291987 7942 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,200.00 361203 711212012 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 65.77 OXYGEN 00003649 291988 05031143 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 65.77 361204 7112/2012 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 35.00 PERMIT FOR SNOWMOBILE 291591 3058 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.00 361205 7/12/2012 130293 MDA 252.87 SUNGLASSES 291643 93509 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 252.87 361206 711212012 103319 MEDALIST CONCERT BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/18/12 291627 070112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 361207 711212012 101483 MENARDS 24.82 RUSTOL SPRAY, AIR FRESHENER 00006023 292043 91190 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 24.82 R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit CITY OF EDINA DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS LINE MARKING POWDER Council Check Register 7/12/2012 — 7/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 361208 7/1212012 102281 MENARDS 10.35 PIPE 00001605 291592 82346 5913.6406 13.95 CONDUIT 00001609 291848 83510 5923.6406 24.30 361209 711212012 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 298.98 FIELD PAINT 00001572 291849 142182 1642.6544 298.98 361210 711212012 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 353,674.67 SEWER SERVICE 291805 0000993039 5922.6302 353,674.67 361211 7112/2012 130571 MIDWEST FILTER CORPORATION 74.57 BOILER FILTERS 00001308 291989 12- 104947 1470.6530 74.57 361212 711212012 120926 MILBERT'S LOCK & SAFE CO. LLC 270.00 DOOR KEY SERVICE 291990 12 -1041 1400.6406 160.00 HYDRAULIC DOOR REPAIR 291991 12 -1042 1400.6406 430.00 361213 711212012 130568 MILES REALTY 375.42 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 291992 6609 RIDGEVIEW 5900.2015 DR 375.42 361214 711212012 100895 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPOR 212.22 TOOL REPAIRS 00001562 291850 13825774 1646.6180 212.22 361215 711212012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,000.00 SEWERANATER REPAIR 00001059 292044 34106 05525.1705.21 2,850.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00001059 292044 34106 03471.1705.21 4,850.00 361216 711212012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,000.00 SEWERIWATER REPAIR 00001044 292045 34109 05525.1705.21 3,725.00 SEWERIWATER REPAIR 00001044 292045 34109 03471.1705.21 5,725.00 361217 711212012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/12/2012 — 7/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,350.00 SEWERIWATER REPAIR 00001073 292046 34111 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,380.00 SEWERIWATER REPAIR 00001073 292046 34111 03471.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5,730.00 361218 711212012 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 18,683.33 WATER PURCHASED 291630 431- 0005.30D -7/ 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 12 18,683.33 361219 711212012 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 58.26 CO2 CYLINDER 291593 183043090 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 58.26 361220 7/12/2012 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 10.69 WINDOW CLEANING 291594 921099033 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 42.75 291595 921099031 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 32.18 291596 921099032 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 85.62 361221 711212012 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS 342.81 DWI FORFEITURE FORMS 292047 18126910 1400.6575 PRINTING 342.81 361222 7/1212012 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 900.96 EMULSION 00005446 291851 67488 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 900.96 361223 711212012 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 197.34 PARADE FLYER PRINTING 292048 11613 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 197.34 361224 711212012 124467 MN MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC. 51.68 ELEMENTS 00002076 292049 29287 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS 51.68 361226 711212012 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 63.34 ARM ASSEMBLY, BOLTS 00005390 291852 504871F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 63.34 361226 7/1212012 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,100.00 MAGAZINE ADS 292050 276815 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,100.00 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 20 Business Unit RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK DISTRIBUTION PSTF FIRE TOWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET RENOVATION SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 75.00 361235 711212012 129158 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC. 2,720.00 STREET RECON FINANCE STUDY 292052 2935 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 2,720.00 361236 711212012 105007 NU- TELECOM CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 7/12/2012 — 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 361227 711212012 129224 MULBERRY BUILDERS 100.00 PERMIT OVERCHARGE REFUND 00115393 291993 070312 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 100.00 361228 711212012 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 591.48 MAR - JUNE 2012 MILEAGE 291994 063012 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 591.48 361229 711212012 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 328.50 292115 74505 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 328.50 361230 711212012 102551 NFPA 428.35 SAFETY BROCHURES 00003812 291995 555444BY 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 428.35 361231 711212012 104350 NIKE USA INC. 649.87 MERCHANDISE 291644 941994384 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 65.00- CREDIT 291645 13168711 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,403.46 MERCHANDISE 292051 942088293 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,988.33 361232 711212012 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 85.45 STEEL 00005282 291546 235622 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.45 361233 711212012 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 632.91 LIGHT BARS 00005188 291547 30799 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 823.18 EMERGENCY LIGHTS 00001617 291597 30909 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 578.62 LIGHT BAR 00005192 291996 30889 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,034.71 361234 7112/2012 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/15/12 291623 070112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 75.00 361235 711212012 129158 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC. 2,720.00 STREET RECON FINANCE STUDY 292052 2935 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 2,720.00 361236 711212012 105007 NU- TELECOM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/1012012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 22 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 557.72 PSAP SERVICE 291997 80717283 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 361237 711212012 116114 OCE 84.41 JUNE 2012 MAINTENANCE 291598 987760767 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 84.41 361238 711212012 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 55.24 FILE FOLDERS 292053 613666558001 160D.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 33.83 LITERATURE HOLDERS, MARKERS 00006364 292054 1478644827 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 89.07 361239 711212012 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 15.88 CLEVIS SLIPS 00000540 291806 689133 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.88 361240 711212012 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 557.22 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291998 070312 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 557.22 361241 7112/2012 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 90.84 INTERIOR CLEAN UP 00005448 291999 226761 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.84 361242 711212012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 568.12 291725 8356499 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 614.87 291726 8356500 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 447.00 291727 8356503 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,629.99 361243 711212012 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 MONTHLY FEE 292068 17714607 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 361244 711212012 119219 PCINAMETAG 66.01 SOLICITOR SUPPLIES 292000 15462433 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.01 361245 711212012 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 100.80 291489 74094058 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 494.00 291490 73227906 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 633.36 292082 72666535 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # - Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit _ 1,228.16 361246 7/12/2012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 237.18 291491 2263388 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 1,457.67 291492 2263390 - 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 492.96 291728 2264812 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 600.20 291729 2264808 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 370.33 291730 2264811 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 920.31: 291731. - 2264813 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 785.64 291732 2264815 5842:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 99.04 291733 2264809 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 331.20 291734 2264818 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. VERNON SELLING 505.55 291735 2264810 5662.5513 COST OFGOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 404.74 291736 .2264816 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 469.45 291737 2264817 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING - 880.97 291738 2264814 5842.5512 COST OF'GOODS:SOLD'LIQUOR YORK SELLING 878:64 292116 -2267493 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 286.82 292117 2267494 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,720.70 361247 711212012 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING:-- 192.00 292118 15743 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 192.00 ' 361248 711212012. 101110 POLLY NORMAN'PHOTOGRAPHY 65.00 HRRC GROUP PHOTO 291599 062612 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS " 65.00 361249 711212012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 400.17 TIRES 00005353 291548 210007243 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.51 TIRES 00005238 291549: 210008295 1553.6583 TIRES &-TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN " 440.68 .36`1250 711212012 101811 -" PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 1,925.82 VEHICLE REPAIR 00005348 291551 21775 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,925.82 -_ 361251 711212012 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 68.85 GLOVES 00005347 291550 48341 1553.6610 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 68.85 i': = 361252 7112/2012 130573 - PRIME SOURCE;ONE L'LC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/1012012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 24 7/12/2012 - 7/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 228.43 PICKLE13ALLS AND PADDLES 292055 ' 70612 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 228.43 361253 711212012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 638.09 WIPES, LINERS, GLOVES 00002057 292056 5653 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 638.09 361264 711212012 103094 PROTECTION ONE 176.43 12743654 MONITORING 291807 061412 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 176.43 361255 711212012 104455 PUPPE, RICHARD 272.94 MILEAGE REIMBURSMENT 291808 070312 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 272.94 361256 711212012 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 1,078.50 EMULSION 00005445 291853 3452 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 1,078.50 - 361257 7/1212012 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 1,231.00 CONSULTATION SERVICES 00001640 292069 62137 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,231.00 361258 711212012 104788 SANDY S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 922.34 FRISBEES FOR PARADE 292057 SH2O39 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 922.34 361259 7112/2012 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 416.25 MAINTENANCE 291809 070212 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 416.25 361260 711212012 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 101.27 STAKES 00001588 291600 41029145 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 47.94 RIGID INSULATION, TAPE 00001503 291854 41031378 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 53.26 LUMBER 00001667 292001 41032398 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 202.47 361261 7112/2012 100995 SEH 304.00 BRAEMAR GC WETLAND 291601 257059 5500.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 304.00 BRAEMAR GC WETLAND 291601 257059 5400.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,850.74 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONSTR 291602 257597 01334.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 5,997.96 W 70TH FINAL LANDSCAPE 291603 256603 01241.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -241 WEST 70TH LANDSCAPING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 75.00 CLASSROOM RENTAL 292058 8760 1624.6406 75.00 Council Check Register 361267 711212012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 7/12/2012 - 7/1212012 291493 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Su_bledger Account Description 291739 3,992.43 _ W 70TH FINAL LANDSCAPE 291604 256968 - 01241.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION ,. 1,700.15 449.80 GOLF TERR'SWALES PLAN 291605 256971 01355.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5862.5513 7,581.53 RICHMOND HILLS IMPROVEMENTS 291811 257599 03471:1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION r 8,919.45 RICHMOND HILLS IMPROVEMENT'S 291811 - 257599 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 292120 11,149.32 RICHMOND HILLS IMPROVEMENTS 291811 257599 04387.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 16,946.96 RICHMOND HILLS IMPROVEMENTS 291811. 257599 01388.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION ' 6,161.98 PROJECT DESIGN 291812 256799 01382.1705.20 CONSUL -TING DESIGN 64,658.17 361262 711212012 122860 SELA ROOFING COMMERCIAL DIVISI 815.00 ROOF REPAIRS`' ` . - 291810 1821 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 815.00 361263 711212012 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. - 58:65 CURB TOOL, TROWEL _ ` 00001610 291813 168188 1301.6556 TOOLS 170.00 JIGSAW 00601610 291813 168188 1553.6556 TOOLS 228.65 361264 711212012 103249 = SHANNON, JIM. 140.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7 /17112 291625 070112 5760.6136 - PROFESSIONAL SVC.- OTHER 140.00 361265 7/1212012 130566 SINHA, KINGSHUK 4.41 RESERVATION REFUND „ 292003 070612 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 60.59 RESERVATION' REFUND 292003 070612 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT 65.00 361266 711212012 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 75.00 CLASSROOM RENTAL 292058 8760 1624.6406 75.00 361267 711212012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 145.50 291493 1833452 5842.5512 124.00 291494 1838038 5842.5513 293.50 291739 1827719 5822.5513 1,712.00 291740 1787640 5842.5513 ,. 1,700.15 291741 1833479 5842.5512 511.00 291742 1838036 5862.5513 947.29 291743 1838046 5862.5513 422.50 291744 1827762 5862.5513 233.98 292119 1833485 5842.5512 • 492.78 292120 1833484 5822.5512 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 25 Business Unit A -241 WEST 70TH LANDSCAPING BA455 GOLF TERRACE N -HOOD RICHMOND HILLS PK� RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK RICHMOND HILLS PK- BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODSS I OLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING . 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 26 7/1212012 - 7112/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 444.00 292121 1838047 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,440.03 292122 1833486 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 417.00 292123 1827766 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,883.73 361268 711212012 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI 5,430.62 3RD QTR 291606 201212 1130.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 5,430.62 361269 711212012 101462 SPORT HALEY INC. 42.14 MERCHANDISE 291646 PSI - 209496 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 42.14 361270 711212012 101004 SPS COMPANIES 263.16 ZINC ANODE RODS 00005194 291814 52567025.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 267.18 VALVE 00005194 291814 S2567025.001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 530.34 361271 711212012 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 145.60 SUBSCRIPTION 291607 493121 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 145.60 361272 711212012 130570 STELBERG, DARIEN 71.00 CLASS REFUND 292002 070312 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 71.00 361273 711212012 101015 STRETCHERS 129.99 UNIFORMS 00003819 291552 1937337 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 129.99 361274 7112/2012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 835.14 VEHICLE REPAIR 00005312 291553 612077 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 835.14 361276 7112/2012 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 110.50 MERCHANDISE 291647 629634 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 110.50 361276 711212012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 923.00 291495 003245 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 772.00 292124 003319 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 875.00 292125 003366 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,570.00 361277 711212012 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 720.00 MOVIES 291815 DB1699285 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 720.00 361278 7/1212012 130508 SWANSTON EQUIPMENT CORP. 58.38 SEAL REPLACEMENT 00005173 291608 5-0091711 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.38 361279 711212012 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 292059 096507 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 40.00 361280 711212012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 362.16 MERCHANDISE 291648 18225909 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 341.68 291649 18225910 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 204.82 291650 18260203 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 157.34 292060 18265359 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 89.30 292061 18260202 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,155.30 361281 711212012 120325 TCC MATERIALS 292.01 MORTAR 00001496 291554 0000571970 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 12.00- CREDIT 291555 0000572360 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 280.01 361282 711212012 113549 TENNIS WEST 3,150.00 INSTALL GATE, RAMP RAILINGS 00001444 292070 12- 007713 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 3,150.00 361283 711212012 121253 THAYER, LARRY 69.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 291816 062912 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 69.38 361284 711212012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 173.50 292126 700055 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 116.05 292127 699228 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,714.70 292128 00740688 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,004.25 361285 711212012 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 1,552.19 CITY OF EDINA 291651 0735020 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Council Check Register 1,552.19 7/1212012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390.00 GOLF COURSE/DOME AD 291609 2012 -81835 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 390.00 GOLF COURSEIDOME AD 291610 2012 -81834 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 291.66 EDINA LIQUOR AD 291611 2012 -70919 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 291.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 291611 2012 -70919 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 291.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 291611 2012 -70919 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,655.00 322.07 361286 711212012 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 361289 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 28 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 157.50 VET MEM COMMITTEE MINUTES 291817 . M19153 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 157.50 361287 711212012 101474 TITLEIST 1,552.19 GOLF BALLS 291651 0735020 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,552.19 361288 7/12/2012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 291.56 REPAIR WELDING MACHINE 00005354 291556 398301 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.51 WELDING GAS 00005450 292004 444272 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 322.07 361289 711212012 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 144.29 LAWN SERVICE 00001637 291855 132499 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 112.22 LAWN SERVICE 00001635 291856 132498 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 256.51 361290 711212012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 724.39 SPINDLE 00005189 291557 J162710 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 724.39 SPINDLE 00005432 291558 JI62891 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,448.78 361291 711212012 130572 TWIN CITIES APPLIANCE 279.57 ICE MAKER 292005 110480 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 73.52 ICE MAKER REPAIRS 292006 110461 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 35.00 DISHWASHER REPAIRS 292007 110482 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 114.90 DRYER REPAIRS 292008 110483 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 502.99 361292 711212012 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 90.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 292062 101934138 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 90.00 361293 711212012 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA = 7/10/2012 15:11:19 - R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier /;Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 960.00 RECERTIFICATION WORKSHOP!(6) 00001631 291818 PESTICIDE 1643.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE APPLICATOR 120.00 00001631 292071 2012 LPAT 1643.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 1,080.00 361294 7/1212012 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 149.55 LOCATING FLAGS 00001336 291559 700511 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 149.55 361295 711212012 100050 USPS- HASLER _ 8,000.00 ACCT #75983 291819 070212 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL.SERVICES GENERAL 8,000.00 361296 7112/2012 101058 VAN PAPER CO. J 54.88 LIQUOR BAGS 291612 240811 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 650.45 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 _291620 240796 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES ; YORK SELLING 3.69 FORKS 00007513 291821 240782 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 345.65 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 291821 240782 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 24.86- CREDIT " 291822 240974CI . 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 673.03 CAN LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00001583 291857 240781 -00 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL „ 307.06 TISSUE,, TOWELS -` 00001565_ . 291858 240348 -00 1646.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES. BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.09 LIDS - 292063 240429 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 2,057.99 361297 711212012 130510 • VANDERBILT, WILL 54.65 BIRDHOUSE MATERIALS 00001630 291859 070212 1646.6577 LUMBER- BUILDING MAINTENANCE 54.65 _ 361298 711212012 101061 VICTORY_ CORP$ 689.78 FLAG POLE 00001584 292072 177956 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 689.78 361299 711212012 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER n 21.70 SAFETY GLASSES 00005331 291560 299794 1553.6610. SAFETY EQUIPMENT _ EQUIPMENT - OPERATION GEN 622.40 SAFETY GLASSES, VESTS 00001582 291860 300826 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE ` 644.10 361300 711212012 119454 VINOCOPIA 572.50 291745 0059217 -1N 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 672.75 292129 0059352 7IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR _ YORK SELLING 256.76 292130 0059309 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 114.00 292131 0059307 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 30 7/12/2012 - 7/1212012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 111.75 292132 0059245 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 114.00 292133 0059351 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 361301 711212012 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 293.87 LIGHT BULBS 00001598 291613 15206700 -00 1322.6530 293.87 361302 711212012 100423 WACONIA FARM SUPPLY 136.85 CUTTER HOUSING 00005179 292009 76142 1553.6530 107.85 ASM CUTTER 00005183 292010 76171 1553.6530 71.23 MOWER PARTS 00001625 292011 76257 1641.6530 71.23 MOWER PARTS 00001625 292012 76265 1641.6530 387.16 361303 711212012 102542 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC 1,011.95 FEASIBILTY STUDY 291823 21380800005 44008.1705.20 1,011.95 361304 7112/2012 130574 WATSON COMPANY 1,183.95 CONCESSION FOOD 292075 813667 5520.5510 615.76 292076 814288 5520.5510 1,799.71 361305 711212012 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 201.61 FUEL NOZZLE 00001618 291614 44492 1552.6530 201.61 361306 711212012 101079 WHEELER LUMBER 513.00 WOOD 00005365 291561 1240- 003987 1553.6585 513.00 361307 711212012 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 375.60 IAAO CONFERENCE AIRFARE 291615 070212 1190.6104 375.60 361308 711212012 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 220.95 291496 303467 -00 5842.5513 4,171.90 291746 303537 -00 5862.5513 1,008.50 291747 303539 -00 5842.5513 2,398.20 292134 303736 -00 5822.5513 3,466.00 292135 303772 -00 5842.5513 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS MOWING REPAIR PARTS MOWING CONSULTING DESIGN P21 50TH &FRANCE CENTER RAMP COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ASSESSING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7110/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 31 7112/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,729.00 292136 303666 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 192.00 292137 303652 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13,186.55 361309 711212012 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 838.50 291497 414665 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,319.39 291748 414940 5842.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,850.80 291749 414942 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,227.47 291750 414941 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 259.84 291751 414943 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 614.35 291752 414939 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 2,128.00 291753 414739 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 138.24 292138 415461 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 565.60 292139 415231 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,942.19 361311 7/12/2012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,518.61 291498 767602 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 100.99 291499 766555 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 49.10- 291500 863041 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 23.56- 291501 863047 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 64.00- 291502 862848 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,898.34 291754 768683 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 631.84 291755 768315 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 926.90 291756 768316 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 43.90 291757 768684 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,432.20 291758 767600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,884.65 291759 767426 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,246.00 291760 768682 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,271.50 291761 768313 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 202.32 291762 768686 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,205.88 291763 768687 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,074.85 291764 768325 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,696.70 291765 768685 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,416.16 291766 768321 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,361.26 291767 768320 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,424.69 291768 767601 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,927.26 291769 767599 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,712.50 291770 765674 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 3,772.74 291771 768324 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 107.61- 291772 862732 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Council Check Register Page - 32 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 108.10- 291773 863227 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 48.00- 291774 862847 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 191.77- 291775 863127 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 812.07 292140 769225 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 43.90 292141 769226 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 713.55 292142 768318 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 74.14 292143 769224 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 903.08 292144 770724 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 341.00 292145 770723 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 877.76 292146 769223 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,231.62 292147 765668 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 52,154.27 361312 711212012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 4,744.60 291503 920317 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,490.19 291504 920042 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING .03 291505 920041 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 120.00 291506 920043 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 43.00 291776 921099 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 96.00 291777 920347 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,540.50 291778 920346 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,907.85 291779 921098 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,639.25 291780 921100 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 291781 921101 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,201.95 292148 923141 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,698.80 292149 923377 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 24,503.67 361313 7/1212012 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,324.50 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 291616 20- 01686 -170 01383.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -383 W44TH ST 14,653.50 PED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS 291824 2 -01686 -300 01404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 1,037.96 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 291825 7 -01686 -250 05526.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRACY AVE 1,927.64 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 291825 7- 01686 -250 03472.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRACY AVE 2,817.32 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 291825 7- 01686- 250 04388.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRACY AVE 9,045.08 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 291825 7- 01686 -250 01362.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 31,806.00 361314 711212012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 867.65 51- 9251919 -0 291617 330438877 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 559.86 51- 6046826 -0 291618 330385872 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 446.16 51- 6229265 -9 291619 330391133 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,884.05 51- 6229265 -9 291.619 330391133 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,873.34 51- 4827232 -6 138.01 51- 5938955 -6 30.30 51- 7567037 -0 31.62 51- 4151897 -6 677.06 51- 9013604 -6 1,115.32 51- 5847121 -5 1,237.91 51- 6979948 -4 1,562.74 51- 6979948 -4 1,881.66 51 -6979948 -4 1,493,10 51- 5634814 -2 3,152.87 51- 5547446 -1 21,252.64 51- 4888627 -1 3,631.96 51- 6840050 -6 41,836.25 361315 711212012 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 211.94 JUNE 2012 - PARK & REC 00004322 291622 062407494 70.86 COPIER USAGE 291862 062407566 282.80 361316 711212012 103226 YEADON FABRIC DOMES INC. 28,800.00 GOLF DOME REMOVAL/DISPOSAL 00007.121 291826 US15484 -IN 28,800.00 361317 7112/2012 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 1,183.00 ANIMATION / GAME DESIGN 291827 2920 1,183.00 1,183,386.22 Grand Total 1550.6151 1628.6103 5200.1727 5125.6103 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF DOME 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 33 Business Unit POOL OPERATION AQUATIC WEEDS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY STORM LIFT STATION MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO Payment Instrument Totals . Check Total 1,183,386.22 Total Payments 1,183,386.22 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/12/2012 — 711212012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 291620 330361926 5311.6185 291621 330384396 4086.6185 291631 330732028 1321.6185 291632 330684752 1646.6185 291633 330915297 5913.6185 291634 330868213 5914.6185 291635 330891057 5821.6185 291635 330891057 5861.6185 291635 330891057 5841.6185 291861 330717210 5934.6185 292018 330019493 1628.6185 292083 331020832 5511.6185 292084 331224945 5921.6185 361315 711212012 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 211.94 JUNE 2012 - PARK & REC 00004322 291622 062407494 70.86 COPIER USAGE 291862 062407566 282.80 361316 711212012 103226 YEADON FABRIC DOMES INC. 28,800.00 GOLF DOME REMOVAL/DISPOSAL 00007.121 291826 US15484 -IN 28,800.00 361317 7112/2012 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 1,183.00 ANIMATION / GAME DESIGN 291827 2920 1,183.00 1,183,386.22 Grand Total 1550.6151 1628.6103 5200.1727 5125.6103 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF DOME 7/10/2012 15:11:19 Page - 33 Business Unit POOL OPERATION AQUATIC WEEDS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY STORM LIFT STATION MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO Payment Instrument Totals . Check Total 1,183,386.22 Total Payments 1,183,386.22 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 7/12/2012 - 7/12/2012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 123,894.08 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 410.17 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 102,623.08 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 15,610.30 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,850.74 05100 ART CENTER FUND 7,644.96 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 28,800.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 49,651.73 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 19,543.97 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 24,867.73 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 646.03 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 9,504.86 05800 LIQUOR FUND 245,860.06 05900 UTILITY FUND 486,961.77 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 18,578.39 05950 RECYCLING FUND 39,958.20 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,526.31 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,453.84 Report Totals 1,183,386.22 We confirm to the best of our ImoWledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures l� 7/10/2012 15:12:06 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 4/28/12- 5/25/12 Number Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name Merchant City State Account **7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012104/25 $60.00 BUSINESS EXPENS SQ *CHOICE MARKETING, INC BOOTHWYN PA 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/07 $8.09 MEAL SBARRO 740 LAS VEGAS NV 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/08 $25.00 REGISTRATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIAT 703- 273 -0911 VA 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/07 $17.00 TAXI TAXI PASSVEGAS.COM LAS VEGAS NV 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/07 $22.80 TAXI TAXI CAB SERVICE LAS VEGAS NV 1470.6104 **7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/08 $9.71 MEAL FOOD COURT GAT30405716 LAS VEGAS NV 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/09 $40.00 PARKING MSP AIRPORT PARKING SAINT PAUL MN 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012105/08 $17.76 TAXI TAXI CAB SERVICE LAS VEGAS NV 1470.6104 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/16 $106.52 STATION SUPPLIES TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/15 $1,190.07 TUITION MNSCU 877 - 4666728 MN 1470.6104 **7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/16 $86.35 BOOKS B &N BOOKST MINN -ST -U #3739 507 - 389 -1649 MN 1470.6104 *`7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/21 $15.89 STATION SUPPLIES AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1470.6406 "7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012%05/23 $44.51 MEETING DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1470.6106 **7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/23 $33.50 FOOD JERRY'S FOODS EDINA MN 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/24 $8.88 MEETING JERRY'S FOODS EDINA MN 1470.6406 * *7693 MARTY SCHEERER 2012/05/24 $25.91 SHIPPING THE UPS STORE 1715 EDINA MN 1470.6180 **0127 KAREN KURT 2012/05/11 $919.87 DUES ICMA 202 - 962 -3621 DC 1120.6105 * *0127 KAREN KURT 2012/05/15 $137.51 MEETING D'AMICO & SONS /EDINA EDINA MN 1100.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/04/27 $225.00 CONFERENCE GOVTTRNGSVC 651 - 222 -7409 MN 1120.6104 '* *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/04/27 $419.95 HOTELS GRAND VIEW LODGE & TENNIS NISSWA MN 1120.6104 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/04 ($180.34) HOTELS GRAND VIEW LODGE & TENNIS NISSWA MN 1120.6104 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/09 $31.64 MEETING EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/11 $1,216.00 MEMBERSHIP ICMA 202 - 962 -3621 DC 1120.6105 *'0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/14 $19.00 PARKING RBC PLAZA Q02 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/18 $43.14 BOOKS AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILL WA 1120.6405 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/18 $18.41 MEETING EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1100.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/18 $17.00 PARKING 501 OPUS #0003 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1120.6106 "0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/21 $41.79 MEETING GOOD EARTH I EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012/05/22 $135.57 BUSINESS EXPENS SPRINT *WIRELESS 800 - 639 -6111 KS 1120.6188 "0168 SCOTT NEAL 2012105/22 $40.60 MEETING BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/05/01 $163.58 MEETING D'AMICO & SONS /EDINA EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012105/01 $9.79 MRO SUPPLIES MONOPRICE INC 909 - 989 -6887 CA 1628.6406 **0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/05109 $38.00 CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITI 612 - 7207667 MN 1140.6104 **0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/05/11 $119.45 TRANSACTION FEE PAY FLOW PRO 888 - 883 -9770 NE 1550.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2012/05/11 $19.95 TRANSACTION FEE PAY FLOW PRO 888 - 883 -9770 NE 1550.6155 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2012/05/23 $15.48 EATING /DRINKING RED ROBIN #92 PORTLAND OR 1180.6104 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2012/05/01 $200.00 EDUCATION IAAO ORG 816 - 7018100 MO 1190.6104 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 4/28/12- 5/25/12 Number Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name Merchant City State. Account **0101 WAYNE HOULE 2012104/24 $20.91 SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 1552.6406 **0101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/04/25 $240.93 SUPPLIES NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT BURNSVILLE MN 1553.6858 * *0101 WAYNE HOULE 2012/05/24 $77.18 SUPPLIES ACME TOOLS #220 PLYMOUTH MN 1314.6406 **0135 JEFF LONG 2012/04/27 $20.00 PARTS TOPPERS AND MORE SOUTH SAINT P MN 1400.6160 **0135 JEFF LONG 2012/04/30 $549.00 REGISTRATION NENA 703 - 812 -4600 VA 2310.6104 **0135 JEFF LONG 2012/05/02 $174.00 REPAIR LABOR NORCON COMMUNICATIONS 5162390300 NY 1400.6808 * *0135 JEFF LONG" 2012/05/03 $35.87 HARDWARE PCCSALES 800- 8000011 NH 1400.6160 **0135 JEFF LONG 2012/05/04 $551.60 AIRFARE DELTA AIR 0062304180392 DELTA.COM CA 2310.6104 **0135 JEFF LONG 2012/05/07 $41.31 CABLE WWW.NEWEGG.COM 800 - 390 -1119 CA 1400.6160 * *0135 JEFF LONG 2012/05/17 $131.31 .SOFTWARE WWW.NEWEGG.COM 800 - 390 -1119 CA 1400.6160 * *0135 JEFF LONG 2012/05/18 $29.87 SUPPLIES LA POLICE GEAR INC 866 - 793 -1911 CA 1400.6203 * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2012/05/10 $73.86 FUEL SUPERAMERICA 4479 MONTICELLO MN 1400.6107 * *0119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/05/03 $35.61 POSTAGE PB METER REN *TAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5710.6235 **0119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/05/04 $53.56 WHOLESALE TRADE PITTSBURGH PAINTS 9853 ST PAUL MN 5311.6532 **0119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/05/08 $202.87 REPAIR HINGES DURAFLEX INTERNATION 775 - 3430115 NV 5311.6406 * *0119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/05/08 $48.28 OTHER RAINBOW PLAY SYSTEMS 612 - 8329001 MN 5311.6406 * *0119 JOHN KEPRIOS - 2012/05/11 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 5710.6230 * *0119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/05/15 $14.00 MEMBERSHIP PAYPAL *WOMENINLEIS 402 - 935 -7733 CA 5760.6104 * *0119 JOHN KEPRIOS 2012/05/15 $126.00 TOUR BALLPARK MN TWINS 4 800 - 3389467 MN 1629.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/04/28 $5.00 SPAM FILTER AKSMT.COM 877- 273 -8550 CA 1130.6124 **0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/04/30 $25.00 REGISTRATION PAYPAL *GUNNYSMOM09 402 -935 -7733 CA 1130.6106 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/04/30 $50.00 MEMBERSHIP PAYPAL *NTAUPPERMID 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1130.6105 **0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/04/30 $50.00 MEMBERSHIP PAYPAL *NTAUPPERMID 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1.130.6105 **0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/01 $50.00 MEMBERSHIP PAYPAL *NTAUPPERMID 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1130.6105 "0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/07 $17.51 POSTAGE USPS 26459003433406778 HOPKINS MN 1130.6235 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/07 $49.00 SUBSCRIPTION CTO *GOTOMEETING.COM 800 - 263 -6317 CA 1495.6103 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/08 $46.50 COMMISSION EBAY INC. 888 - 749 -3229 CA 421130.4721 **0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/13 $59.85 SUBSCRIPTION SURVEYMONKEY.COM 971 - 2445555 CA 1130.6103 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/17 $86.28 MEETING JASONS DELI EDINA EDINA MN 1130.6106 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/18 $9.99 IMAGES ISTOCK *INTERNATIONAL 866 -478 -6251 WA 1130.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/21 $24.99 MEDIA KIT ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800 - 2280475 NE 5311.6406 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/22 $649.00 CONFERENCE PAYPAL *3CMA 402 - 935 -7733 DC 1130.6104 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/24 $55.00 EMMY ENTRIES PAYPAL *NTAUPPERMID 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1130.6104 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/24 $275.00 EMMY ENTRIES PAYPAL *NTAUPPERMID 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1130.6104 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/24 $110.00 EMMY ENTRIES PAYPAL *NTAUPPERMID 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1130.6104 * *0085 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2012/05/24 $55.00 EMMY ENTRIES PAYPAL *NTAUPPERMID 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1130.6104 **5821 AMY SMITH 2012/04/25 $51.69 SUPPLIES XPEDX PAPER & GRAPHICS BLOOMINGTON MN 5410.6513 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 4/28/12- 5/25/12 Number Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name Merchant City State Account * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/04/26 $122.65 SUPPLIES GOLFSMITH GOLF CTR #68 RICHFIELD MN 5410.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2012/04/28 ($371.26) MRO SUPPLIES MONOPRICE INC 9099896887 CA 5410.6406 **0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/04/27 $346.94 PUMP PRODUCTDEVE 952 - 913 -7306 MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/01 $170.30 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5761.6406 -0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/04 $89.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5760.6513 **0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/07 $35.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES SMARTSIGN 718 - 797 -1900 NY 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/14 $9.63 SUPPLIES GOODWILL BLOOMINGTON. MN 5761.6406 0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/14 $157.00 SUPPLIES GROTH MUSIC BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/14 $55.63 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/21 $162.23 SUPPLIES MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/22 $205.30 SUPPLIES WM SUPERCENTER #2198 BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6406 * *0667 TOM SHIRLEY 2012/05/24 $82.88 SUPPLIES BACHMAN'S INC #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5761.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/04/29 $83.31 OVEN MILLS FLEET FARM #2,500 LAKEVILLE MN 5840.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/04/30 $21.42 SUPPLIES THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5841.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/01 $78.16 SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5840.6513 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/03 ($21.40) MATERIALS MENARDS 3021 BURNSVILLE MN 5800.1720 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/03 $99.58 MATERIALS MENARDS 3021 BURNSVILLE MN 5800.1720 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/04 $39.77 WALL MOUNT MONOPRICE INC 909 - 989 -6887 CA 5800.1720 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/08 $13.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5822.6512 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/08 $24.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5820.6513 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/08 $27.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5842.6512 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/08 $13.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5862.6512 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/15 $144.00 OFFICE SERVICES MORAN USA LLC 800 -486 -6726 CT 5842.5515 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/15 $75.90 TICKET MOLDING MORAN USA LLC 800 -486 -6726 CT 5822.6406 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/16 $8.34 OFFICE SERVICES MORAN USA LLC 800 -486 -6726 CT 5842.5515 "0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2012/05/17 $8.03 OFFICE SERVICES MORAN USA LLC 800 -486 -6726 CT 5822.6406 CITY OF EDINA 2012/05/15 ($272.82) PURCHASING REBATE US BANK EDINA MN 1001.8070 $10,970.21 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poliplqs and procedum date -71,51 1, City Manager 11 0 e �v •r • �roRess REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. C. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE ® Action Director of Engineering F] Discussion Date: July 17, 2012 11 Information Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -86 Findings Of Fact Denying A Request For Vacation Of Right -Of -Way Natchez Avenue and West 41 st Street Recommendation: Adopt attached Resolution No. 2012 -86 Findings Of Fact Denying A Request For Vacation Of Right -Of -Way Natchez Avenue and West 41St Street. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2012 -86 g: \pw \admin \comm \extemal \general corr by streets \n streets \natchez avenue vacation \Item tv. c. resolution no 2012 -86 findings of fact denying a request for vacation of right -of -way natchez avenue and west 41 st street.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -86 DENYING THE VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OF SEGMENTS OF NATCHEZ AVENUE AND WEST 41ST STREET WHEREAS, a petition was received on May 9, 2012 from one property owner at 4166 Monterey Avenue requesting the vacation of existing ';public right-'of -way of Natchez Avenue between Monterey Avenue and. south property line of Lot 15; 'Block 4, of Minikanda, Vista, Third Addition, Morningside Minnesota.,. and West 41St Street.from Natchez Avenue to Monterey Avenue; and WHEREAS, the petitioning property owner owns only.a small segment of the property abutting the right'of -way that the petitioner has asked to be vacated; and WHEREAS, after two weeks published; and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on June 19, 2012, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard. thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the easement may be needed for access to adjacent property by pedestrians, bicycles and motorized vehicles; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that is not in the best interest of the City and of the public that the vacation be made: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,. Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described right -of -ways is not vacated: EASEMENT 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED: That part of Natchez Avenue South lying southerly of a line parallel with and 1.00.00 feet south of the westerly extension of the south line of 41 at Street West and lying westerly of a line lying 50.00 feet westerly of the easterly right of way line of Monterey Avenue, formerly known as Oakdale Avenue, as dedicated in the.plat of WILLIAM SCOTT'S ADDITION, all according the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EASEMENT 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED CONDITION ON RETAINING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT: That part of Natchez Avenue South.lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 14, Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION; MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", and lying northerly of a line parallel with and 100.00 feet south of the westerly extension of the south line of 41St Street West together with that part of 41St Street West lying easterly of Natchez. Avenue South and westerly of the southerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 12, said Block 4, "MINIKAHDA VISTA, THIRD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE MINNESOTA ", all according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Dated: July 17, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT James B. Hovland, Mayor 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Resolution No. 2012 -86 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2012 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk �CbR6P9U8 �� REPORURECOIV MEN®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.D. From: Cheryl Engelman ® Action Community Health ❑ Discussion Administrator Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -92 Authorizing Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement • ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -92 authorizing the City of Edina to enter into a= Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and receive grant funding of $48,366. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Edina receives funding from MDH for Public Health Emergency Preparedness to continue preparing for response to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, mass dispensing and other threats to public health. The amount of funding for 2012- 2013 is $48,366.. This is the eleventh year of public health emergency preparedness grant. As in the past, the grant money will be used specifically to cover costs of the Public Health Emergency Preparedness contract agreement with the City, of Bloomington, Edina staff training, and emergency preparedness supplies. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: (PDF format only) • Resolution No. 2012 -92 Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement A, RESOLUTION NO 2012 -92 o 8 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA 0 .a O ENTER INTO A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS GRANT PROJECT `"~``° AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH City of Edina WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services, and WHEREAS, the STATE and the City of Edina have entered into a master grant contract effective January 1, 2009, and WHEREAS, the STATE has entered into an agreement with the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to assist local health departments in demonstrating measurable and sustainable progress toward achieving public health preparedness capabilities and other activities that promote safer and more resilient communities, and implement and carry out the CDC's Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into Public Health Emergency Response Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health to successfully complete administrative and programmatic duties contained within this grant agreement. A Passed and adopted this 17th day of July 2012. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET -- EDINA,- MINNESOTA, - 5542.4-1 -39 -4- -_- __- Www.City9tEdina.com _ __ __ ___TTY 952- 826 -0379 1VIDH Encumbrance Worksheet (Attach to all contracts, grants, and amendments) Vendor Name: City of Edina CHIB Vendor Number: 0000197683 Address: Federal Employer I.D. or Social Security #: 4801 W 50th St. 41- 6005118 City, State, Zip: Minnesota Tax I.D. No. (if applicable): Edina, MN 55424 H12- 8880552A Starting Fiscal Year: 13 Total Amount of Agreement: $ 48,366 Start Date: 8110/12 End Date: 6/30/2013 H123 0800 Accounting Information Fiscal Year 1 Fund I Dept ID I Appr ID I Project ID I Activity ID I Amount 3000 H123. 0800 H12888T H12- 8880552A PHEP 0833 $ 31,604 3000 H123 0800 H12888T _ H12- 8880552A CR10830 $ 11,183 3000 H123 0800 H12888T H12- 8880421W PHEP Special 0809 $ 2,000 3000 H123 0800 H12888T H12- 8880421W CRI Special 0810 $ 3,579 CFDA # (if Federal $) 1 93.069 Fiscal Year 2 Fund Dept ID Appr ID Project ID Activity ID Amount Project ID H123 Amount Purchase Order Number H123 $ H123 $ Account' ID H123 $ H123 $ H123 $ CFDA # (if Federal $) Fiscal Year 3 Fund Dept ID Appr ID Project ID Activity ID Amount Purchase Order Number H123 Source Type Category Code $ Account' ID H123 $ H123 $ CFDA # (if Federal $) Financial Management Only A" Authorized Signature for Encumbrance. Date �. Contract Number '�.�� Origin Code Purchase Order Number OO OOH Source Type Category Code r g l O b�� Account' ID l +Lt 13 NOTE: This page of the Agreement Contract contains confidential information and should not be reproduced or distributed externally without written permission from the Vendor. Internal circulation of this page should only be to individuals/offices signing this Agreement Contract and those that require access to the tax identification number. Financial Management (651) 209 -4622 7126111 kinnesota Department of health Grant Project Agreement for Community Health Boards Pcrblie flealth EDnergeneV Preparerbzess (PIIEP & CRI) CFDA # 93.069 THIS GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT, and amendments and supplements thereto, is between the State of Minnesota, acting through .its Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Health (hereinafter "STATE ") and City of Edina Community Health Board, an independent organization. not an employee of the State of Minnesota, address 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 ( hereinafter "GRANTEE "), witnesseth that: WHERE-AS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 3144.0742 is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services; and WHEREAS, the STATE and the GRA:N:I.'EE have entered into master grant contract number 12- 700 -00078 (hereinafter "MASTER GRANT CONTRACT ") effective January 1, 2009; and WHEREAS, the STATE has entered into a :Public Elea Ith.Emergency Preparedness Cooperative Agreement with the Centers.for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the Catalog of Domestic Assistance Number CFDA# 93 -069 to assist state, local and territorial /freely associated state health departments in demonstrating measurable and sustainable progress toward achieving public health preparedness capabilities and other activities that promote safer and more resilient communities; and implement and carry out the CDC's Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning. This preparedness program is authorized under Section 319C of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act as amended by the Pandemic and A1.1- I-lazards Preparedness Act of 2006 (PAPHA).:If applicable, contingent supplemental emergency response awards are authorized under 317 (a) and 317 (d) of the PITS Act subject to available funding and other requirements and limitations; and WHEREAS throughout the project period, CDC's commitment to continuation of awards will be conditioned on the availability of funds, evidence of satisfactory progress by GRANTEE (as documented in required reports, plans, benchmarks and other deliverables), and the determination that continued funding is in the best interest of the federal government; and WHEREAS the terms and conditions of the :funding require that GRANTEE must perform a substantial role in performing and carrying out all work under the grant and may not merely serve as a conduit for payment of the award or portion thereof to another party or provider to perform their contractual duties. This requires that the GRANTEE is fully capable of performing all of the grant duties within their own agency with existing agency resources; and WHEREAS as a federal condition of this funding, the federal fiinder may modify performance measures, other evaluation and assessment methods, and data collection requirements on an annual basis, or as needed, in accordance with their respective directives, goals and objectives, or as performance measures or other evaluation methods are developed and refined, the grantee accepts these conditions and agrees to follow the direction of the STATE in the implementation of those changes without a formal amendment to this contract; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE represents that iris duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed: Grant Project Agreement Number Between the 'Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community I-fealth Board I INCORPORATION OF MASTER GRANT CONTRACT. Clauses II and IV through YV of the MASTER GRANT CONTRACT are hereby incorporated by reference into this project agreement. Whenever the phrase "this grant contract" is incorporated by reference, it shall be interpreted to mead "this project agreement." I1. GRANTEE'S DUTIES. GRANTEE; shall: Administrative Duties AD -1 The GRANTEE 's Authorized Representative shall actively oversee and assure the successful completion of this contract including the accurate and timely submission ofall deliverables and grant related docurne:nts, including but not limited to invoices, exercise documentation; plans and reports required in the performance of this grant agreement. AD-2 GRANTEE shall appropriately obligate and appropriately spend grant funds by the end of each performance period as directed by the STATE. Payments under this contract will. be made from federal funds obtained by the STATE through Title 42 United States Code, CFDA Number 93.069 of the Public Health Services Act as amended. The GRANTEE accepts sole firiancial and legal responsibility for any requirements, fines, penalties or sanctions imposed by the GRANTEE'S failure to comply with any or all applicable federal or state requirements including actions of sub - grantees or independent contractors paid in whole or in part from grant funds. Grant funds may not be used to supplant or supplement funding in other areas. AD -3 GRANTEE- must advise the STATE of any change of the fiscal agent, and. must also maintain the same vendor identification number, DUNS number and C'CR registration for the duration of the five (5) year Project Period and or applicable extension periods. AD -4 GRANTEE must maintain active status in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR) and maintain the :registration with current infor-lnation at all times and shall provide verification of registration and status as directed by the STATE. AD -5 GRANTEE shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations or programmatic standards . applicable to this funding source and the subject matter contained within the contract. AD-6 GRANTEE shall maintains original source documentation for all grant fiords and grant related activities. The GRANTEE shall ensure that these records will be provided to the STATE or Federal Funding Agency immediately upon request. AD -7 GRANTEE shall supply any additional information that may be requested by the STATE or Federal Funding Agency as it relates to the agency's public health preparedness, response capabilities, preparedness milestones, resource assessments, or evidence -based deliverables such as plans, procedures, survey responses, exercises, training records, audits or other documents apparent or necessary to the successful completion. of the GRANTEE'S duties, HPP -PREP Alignment Activities or grant oversight. HE- 01598 -08 (07109) Grant Project Agreement Page 2 Grant Project Agreement Number Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board AD-8 GRANTEE shall participate in site visits, monitoring calls or visits, financial and programmatic revie«'- evaluations, training sessions, regional and or statewide exercises, surveys, assessments, conference calls and meetings as requested or required by the STATE or Federal Funding Agency. A.D -9 GRANTEE shall submit a properly completed budget and detailed budget justification for each award amount. in accordance with the budget instructions provided. The budget and justification shall be received at-the STATE along with the three (3) copies of the GRANTEE signed contract submitted to the STATE for final signature. Any request to amend any portion of the budget must be submitted in writing, the revised budget must be in same format and structure as the original budget, and must include supporting documentation for the requested change or changes. The Revised budget must total the award amount. Non- emergency budget arnendme.nts will not be allowed within the last thirty days (30) days of any grant period. AD -10 GRANTEE shall submit clear, concise and complete reports, invoices and supporting documentation as directed by the STATE. All reports, invoices and supporting documentation shall be submitted in the mariner and format as directed by the STATE. GRANTEES with multiple county members trust complete and submit one (1) properly completed submission for the entire community health. board. Grant reporting requirements are subject to change. The STATE expressly reserves the right to amend or extend the due date of any grant duty or deliverable without a formal amendment. The STATE expressly reserves the right to amend or suspend any grant duty or deliverable within the grant period without a formal amendment. Standing Duties SD -1 GRANTEE shall conduct at least one presentation per grant year, highlighting public health emergency preparedness activities and/or accomplishments to a conununity group within each county, city or tribal jurisdiction covered by the Local .Health Department or Cotrnnunity :Health Board. The presentation should include information on the public health component of recent and /or on -going responses, exercises and improvements to readiness. The purpose of the presentation is to increase the visibility of public health emergency preparedness efforts among elected officials and /or new audiences with whom public health planners are not already working. Appropriate audiences for this presentation may include county boards, community service groups, city councils, govemrnent officials, school officials, or community leaders, but shall not consist primarily of current planning or response partners. The Grantee shall provide a summary of the presentation that includes how the audience was selected, the date of the presentation, number of attendees, and topics discussed. SD -2 GRANTEE shall update MDH Workspace, IMNTrac and :MN.TRA:1N accounts, role matrices, 2=117 contact information and provide other required information within ten (10) calendar days of any changes of appointment of new staff; or change of status of existing staff. GRANTEE shall deactivate access on or prior to the final day of staff employment or assignment requiring access to iVIDH systems. SD -3 GRANTEE shall plan and coordinate preparedness and response efforts at the local and regional level with healthcare coalitions (hospitals, healthcare providers, mental /behavioral health systems, emergenc. medical services, emergency management), tribes as applicable, and other response partners to share H1:- 01598 -08 (07109) Grant Project Agreement Page 3 Grant Project Agreement Number Bemeen the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board expertise, coordinate training and exercises and evaluate response and recovery to .incidents within their jurisdiction and surrounding areas. SD -4 GRANTEE shall designate a.MN Responds administrator; and coordinate with regional health care system preparedness efforts to recruit, train and deploy volunteers in accordance with state and federal law. SD -5 GRANTEE shall prepare, update and maintain a three (3) year exercise calendar in conjunction with their City /County /Tribal Emergency Manager and shall submit the exercise calendar to the OEP Exercise Coordinator on or before November 30 of each calendar year and shall provide timely updates to the OEP Exercise Coordinator for the duration of the contract. SD -6 All exercises developed by the GRANTEE- shall be in accordance with Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation Program (HSEEP) standards. GRANTEE shall submit an After Action Report and improvement Plan (AAR/IP) to the OEP Exercise Coordinator for each exercise conducted at any level with .federal binds. Any exercises that includc:measuring throughput .for countermeasure dispensing (dispensing or vaccinating drills, including drills using Real Opt) shall include the thoughput data according to STATE guidance. The notification forin is located on the MDH Workspace and shall be submitted at the time of the initial planning conference and not later than thirty (30) days prior to the exercise. GRANTEE shall post community exercises in the National Exercise Scheduler (NEYS) in accordance with HSEEP standards. The AAR/IP shall be completed in accordance Nvith HSEEP standards and the GRANTEE shall monitor, implement and re -test by exercising all corrective actions for each exercise. SD -7 GRANTEE shall reply to all STATE. Health Alerts and. Health Alert Updates within one (1) hour of receipt. GRANTEE shall transmit the STATE'S Health Alerts and Health Alert Updates to local Health Alert Network recipients as requested by the STATE within one (1) hour of receipt. SD -8 GRANTEE shall reply to all STATE I- iealth Advisories and Health Advisory Updates within twenty -four (24) hours of.receipt. GRANTEE shall transmit the STATE Health Advisories and Health Advisory Updates within twenty -.four (24) hour of receipt. SD -9 Grantee shall develop and maintain Medical Countermeasure Dispensing, Material Management, and Distribution plans in compliance with current MDH and CDC guidance documents including: MDH guidance posted on the Workspace; Local Technical Assistance Review (LTAR) and supporting guidance; Receiving, Distributing, Dispensing Strategic National Stockpile Assets: A Guide for Preparedness; Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning; and Point of Dispensing (POD) Standards. GRANTEE shall incorporate new state and federal guidance into plans on a minimum of an annual basis. GRANTEE shall address deficiencies and make changes to plans as requested by MDH and /or CDC. SD -10 GRANTEE shall ensure annual capacity building training specific to medical countermeasure dispensing and medical :materiel distribution is provided to lead response staff, as identified by GRANTEE. Dispensing and distribution training sources include CDC online courses and webinars, training events provided by MDH, and trainings, workshops or exercises carried out by local public health departments individually or regionally. All training shall be reported to the STATE using Nf.N.TRAIN or by submitting the MDII training documentation form. GRANTEE shall attend SNS and other:mass prophylaxis related training provided or directed by the STATE. HE- 01598 -08 (07/09) Grant Project Agreement Page 4 Grant Project Agreement Number Between the \4111nesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board Progrannnatie :Duties Performance Period of August 10, 2012 to June 30, 2013 PD -1 GRANTEE shall work witli the regional Public Health Preparedness Consultant to receive approval of the 2012 work plan. GRANTEE shall begin or continue implementation of approved work plans within thirty (30) days of the execution of the contract. PD -2 GRANTEE shall submit progress updates on achieving work plan goals and capabilities as directed by the STATE. PD- 3 GRANTEE shall select at least three of the most pressing issues identified through an approved process for inclusion in an updated 18 -month work plan, which shall be submitted, as directed by the STATE, by June 30, 2013. As a component of the work plan, improvement goals shall be developed that identify the Resource'Elements, and the associated Capabilities and Functions, which will be addressed by each goal. Goals may be developed at the individual agency, community. county, CHB, 111111 i- COUllty, regional or state level. The STATE reserves the right to identify Resource Elements that must be included in GRANTEE work plans. PD -4 GRANTEE shall participate in regional healthcare coalition activities designed to develop a regional risk assessment and a plan for coordinated preparedness planning and response between healthcare, public health, tribes as applicable, and other regional collaborators. GRANTEE shall share the most current jurisdictional risk assessment results, and other applicable assessments and plans. PD -5 GRANTEE shall conduct a minimum of two (2) Health Alert Network (HAN) exercises that include bu. are not limited to hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, emergency managers, and those who according to agency discretion are apparent and necessary to ensure an efficient response to any public health emergency. GRANTEE shall monitor the acknowledgement of response times and each exercise must acliieve a rate of 80 % or more .from each of the partner organizations within two (2) hours. One exercise must be conducted on or before November 30, 2012, and the second on or before iMay 30, 2013. This grant duty may be met using a real incident. P.D -6 GRANTEE shall participate in the state initiated Communication exercise, including testing the Minnesota Bespotids volunteer notification system, as directed by the STATE. P.D -7 GRANTEE shall develop and maintain written plans and agreements for the number of mass dispensing sites necessary to complete dispensing medical countermeasures to the jurisdictional population within 36 hours of receiving materiel. PD -8 G•R.ANTEE shall complete a self- assessment as directed by the STATE covering LTAR elements and related public health capabilities on or before March 1, 2013. The GRANTEE shall also complete surveys and respond to requests from the STATE or CDC for information throughout this project period. Information categories include but are not limited to: population, sites, throughput, staff and volunteer data, training, updates to plans, access to supplies, materiel handling, closed dispensing site partners, and transport and storage equipment systems. PD -9 GRANTEE shall participate in an LTAR visit to be conducted by IVfDH as directed by the STATE. The GRANTF..,E shall submit a copy of their Countermeasure Dispensing and Distribution plan and LTAR supporting documentation to the S ".I'AT'E on or before :March 1, 2013 HE- 01598 -08 (07/09) Grant Project Agreement Page 5 Grant Project Agreement Number Berween the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board PD -10 Grantee shall develop a list of the populations (e.g., residents in LTC or assisted - living facilities) that have difficulty accessing open mass dispensing sites. Grantee shall begin outreach to organizations and facilities that reach the identified populations to explore the use of' Closed :Points of Dispensing. GRANTEES shall provide a summary of their work as directed by the S °I'A':CE. Any activities in planning for Closed PODS shall utilize STATE guidance to develop and /or update strategies and plans. PD -11 Grantee shall, if the STATE so requires, participate in a workshop or seminar sponsored by the STATE to clarify public health roles in a mass fatality event. The STATE shall provide GRANTEES with a sample ".Titten mass fatality plan that may be tailored to the jurisdiction and added to the All- Hazards Response and Recovery plan. PD -12 Grantee shall, if the STATE so requires, participate in a review of:Regional :Distribution Node (RDN) planning with appropriate regional partners. The R.DN plan shall be drafted by MDH staff, in collaboration with grantees. The R:DN plan. will be reviewed using Section 7 of the Local Technical Assistance Review (LIAR) docurnent and other available resources to identify plan gaps and develop a strategy for continuous improvement Cities Readiness Initiative (CR:1) Duties Performance Period of August 10, 2012 to June 30, 20.13 CR -1 During the -year project period, GRANTEE shall, conduct. and /or participate in at least one (1) full -scale CRI MSA exercise that tests and validates medical countermeasure dispensing plans. Exercises shall be developed in accordance with FISEEP. To receive exercise score credit for the current grant year, after action reports /i.riprovement plans must be submitted through the DSNS web -based data collection system before the date set by CDC (expected to be in May 2013). GRANTEES shall also submit all required documents to the OEP Exercise Coordinator in accordance with the standing duties stated within the contract. CR -2 GRANTEE must conduct a minimum of three (3) different DSNS drills during the grant year in accordance with the following: 9. Each drill shall be a different type. GRAN'TEE'S may not complete the same type of drill for credit more than one (1) time. 10. The three (3) required drills shall be chosen from any of the eight (8) available drills as indicated on the :DSNS Extranet w•ebsite. Drill data and /or HSEEP after action reports /improvement plans for drills must be submitted through the DSNS web -based data collection system no later than the date set by CDC (expected to be in May 2013). GRANTEES shall also submit all required documentation to the OEP Exercise Coordinator in accordance with the standing duties stated within the contract. CR -3 GRANTEE shall submit documentation of compliance with the POD standards as described in the Medical Countermeasure Distribution and Dispensing Composite Measure Guide on or before the date set by CDC (expected to be in May 2013). HE- 01598 -08 (07/09) Grant Project Agreement Page 6 Grant Project Agreement Number Between the Niinnesota Department of l lealth and City of Edina Community Health Board III. CONSIDERATION AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. E. Consideration for all services performed by GRANTEE pursuant to this project agreement shall be paid by the STATE as fellows: Award Type Bud et Period 1 Award PREP Base August 10, 2012 to June 30, 2013 $) 1,604.00 PHEP Special ALI ust .10; 2012 to June 30, 2013 $2,000.00 CRI Base August 10, 2012 to June 30, 2013 $11,1_83.00 C:R.I Special August 10, 2012 to June 30, 2013 _ $3,579.00 5. Compensation. The total obligation of the STATE, for all compensation and reimbursement to GRANTEE shall not exceed Forty -eight thousand three hundred sixty -six dollars ($ 48,366.00). F. Terms of Payment The STATE shall make payment as follows: 17. Payments are to be made from federal fiends obtained by the STATE through Section 319C of the Public Health. Service (PHS) Act, as amended by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006. (Public law and amendments thereto.) CFDA 4 93.069 In accordance with 45 CFR 92.23 the Period ofAvailability vJ'Funds generally is accepted to mean where a funding period is specified, a grantee may charge to the award only costs resulting from obligations of the funding period unless carryover of unobl.igated balances .is permitted. PAHPA requires the H14S Secretary to determine the maximum amount of unobligated funds that can be carried over into to each succeeding budget period. Any funds not properly obligated and Liquidated by the GRANTEE for each annual award will lapse and revert back to the STATE[Fulnder. 18. All fnancial transactions will be on a reimbursement basis only. 19. Payments shall be made by the STATE promptly after GRANTEE'S presentation of invoices and supporting documentation for services performed and acceptance of such services by the STATE'S Authorized Representative pursuant to Clause V, except that the STATE reserves the right not to honor invoices that are submitted more than 30 days after the submission date specified below. 20. Invoices and supporting documentation shall be submitted in a form prescribed by the STATE and according to the following schedule: Billing Period` Invoice Period Deadline for Receipt at OEP Quarter 1 August 10-September 30, 2012 No later than October 30,2012 Quarter 2 October 1- December 31. 2012 No later than January 30,2013 uarter 3 January 1 -March 31, 2013 No later than April 30, 2013 Quarter 4/F inal Invoice Aril I - June 30, 2013 No .later than July 30, 2013 Emergency Invoice- Special Circumstances OEP Pre - approval Required for all Emergency Invoices As directed by the STATE HE-0 1598-08 (07/09) Grant Project Agreement Page 7 Grant Project Agreement Number ____. _ . ___ Between the Minnesota Department orlicalth and City of Edina Community Flealth Board `CDC may require quarterly financial updates due ten (10) days after the end of each calendar quarter to monitor obligation of hands. GRANTEE has a continuing obligation to provide additional financial data as directed by the STATE to meet this requirement. IV. TERM 01 AGRF'J.i lE.NT. "Chis project agreement shall be effective on August 10, 2012, or upon the date that the final required signature is obtained by the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.05, Subd. 2, whichever occurs later, and shall reanain in effect until June 30, 2013, except .tor the requirements specified in this project agreement with completion dates which extend beyond the termination date specified in this sentence. GRANTEE understands that NO work should begin under this project agreement until ALL required signatures have been obtained, and GRANTEE is notified to begin work by the STATE. V. STA'PE'S AUTI10RIZED REPRESENTATIVE. The STATE'S Authorized Representative for the purposes of administration of this project agreement Jane Braun, Director Office of Emergency Preparedness or her successor. Such representative shall have final authority for acceptance of GRANTEE'S services and if such services are accepted as satisfactory, shall so certify continuing payment as outlined in Clause III, B. GRANTEE'S Authorized Representative for purposes of administration of this project agreement is Sherry Engleman or her successor. The GRANTEE'S Authorized Representative shall have Rill authority to represent GRANTEE in its fulfillment of the terms, conditions, and requirements of'this project agreement. VI. CANCELLATION. A. I:f the GRANTEE fails to comply with the provisions of this project agreement, the STATE may terminate this project agreement without prejudice to the right of the STATE to recover any money previously paid. The termiiiatiori shall be effective five business days after the STATE mails, by certified mail, return receipt requested, written notice of termination to the GRANTEE at its last known address. 13. The STATE or GRANTEE may cancel this project agreement at any time, with or without cause,.upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party. C. Should this project agreement be terminated or canceled effective before June 30, 2013, the GRANTEE shall, within forty -five (45) days of the date of effective termination or cancellation, refined to the STATE all remaining unexpended monies received from the STATE under this project agreement. D. The STATE shall pay the GRANTEE for services satisfactorily performed pursuant to this project agreement before the effective date of termination or cancellation. VII. AMENDED STATUTES. REGULATIONS AND RULES. As used in this project agreement, the term "Modified Law" means laws that become effective while this project agreement is in effect, .including Minnesota and United States statutory amendments and new statutes, rule amendments and new rules in Minnesota :Rules, and federal regulatory amendments and new federal regulations. Notwithstanding anything in clauses.[ through VI and VIII of this project agreement that conflicts with any Modified Law, GRANTEE agrees to comply with all Modified Law and GRANTEE understands and agrees that (lie STATE will comply with all Modified Law. The STATE will mail or deliver to GRANTEE a copy of all Modified Law affecting this project agreement. The STATE will make all reasonable efforts to HP- 01598 -08 (07/09) Grant Project Agreement Page 8 Grant Project :agreement Number Between [lie Minnesota Department of I Iealth and City of Edina Community Health Board mail or deliver to GRANTEE a copy of any Modified :Law at least fifteen (15) days before it becomes effective. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the pallies have caused this project agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. APPROVED: 1. GRANTEE 2. STATE AGENCY The Gratrtae cenijles that the nppropr; are persons(s) have executed the Project Agreement approval rrnd c•ertocation that ST 1TEf twls have been project agreement on behalfq)'lhe Grawee as required by applicable encurnberecl as required h 1.1inn..S1at. §§ 16:1.15 and 16C. 0.5. articles, bvtaws, resolutions, or• ordinances. By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: By: Title: Date: Distribrition: Agencv — Origbrcr! (/idly executed) Project Agreement Grantee State Authorized Representative (with delegated authority) Fn;- 01598 -08 (07/09) Grant Project Agreement Page 9 /-A O N C�RFOR�• X888 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV. E. From: �� Brian E. Olson, PE Public Works Director Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: Authorization to Participate in 2013 -2014 Fuel Consortium ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize staff to participate in the 2013 -2014 State of Minnesota Fuel Consortium. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Edina has participated in the State of Minnesota's Fuel Consortium Purchase Program since 2009, see attached fuel purchasing history. The purpose of the Fuel Consortium Purchase Program is to develop a consistent fuel budget for each budget year. The Fixed Price Fuel Program is similar to the road salt purchasing program, where the City must agree to a certain volume of fuel to be purchased. The City needs to submit our requested amount by July 25, 2012; State of Minnesota will then go out for bids before January. The City in the past few years has committed up to 70% of our total volume of fuel to be purchased through this program. The other 30% is purchased through the Daily Rack Price for that particular day. Staff does not recommend purchasing 100% of our budgeted fuel, since the consumption of fuel can vary from year to year based on how many miles driven and also how volatile the fuel market has been. There is also a possibility that the Daily Rack Price could go below the Fixed Price making it more advantageous to purchase at a lower cost when possible. Staff has reviewed the information and recommends that City Council authorize Staff to enter a Contract committing to purchase an amount of fuel equal to that of the 2012 - 2013 program. ATTACHMENTS: • Memo of June 25, 2012 from State of Minnesota Materials Management Division • Past fuel purchasing history G: \PW \ADMIN \BUDGETS \Purchasing \Fuel \Item IV. H. Authorization to Participate in 2012 Fuel Consortium.docx DATE: JUNE 25, 2012 TO: PERSPECTIVE FUEL CONSORTIUM MEMBERS FROM: JACKIE FINGER— STATE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION. RE: FIXED PRICE FUEL PROGRAM FOR 2013 -2014 (New Contract Term: February 1, 2013, through January 31, 2014) The State will again lead the 2013 -2014 Fixed Price Fuel Program for qualified participari#s. -The qualification requirements areas follows:. • Participant must be a CPV member and agree to comply with all terms and conditions of the contract. • Participant must be located in the nine county metropolitan area (Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Scott, Sherburne, Ramsey, Wright and Washington) or as amended. • The tanks must be owned and maintained by the Participant. • Participant must be able to take either gasoline or diesel fuel in the required product type (65, B10, etc.) and as delivered by the Contract Vendor in quantities of at least 500 gallons per delivery. • Participant must take 100 percent of the committed monthly amount at the fixed price contracted on its behalf. • Fill rate must be at least 500 gallons or more. • Once final Contracts are executed, the participating agency or entity will be notified of the price and the name of the Contract Vendor. CAREFULLY REVIEW THE'FOLLOWING INFORMATIONM Only those agencies that wish to.participate in the Fixed Price Program must complete the fuel questionnaire an&return it to my attention no later than July 11 2012: ;: , rT B QNcS?h . �R� 'If you are`reguired to obtain approval by your 'dovernina board, plan- accoedingly. Plea §g be careful to-arovide-accurate information. The Spot Price Program does not require firm quantities to be submitted and the Spot Price Program may be used on an as needed basis by any participants in the Fixed Price Fuel Program if they so choose. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via E -mail ( PREFERRED): jackie.finaerCa�state.mn.us or by phone at 651.201.2436 or via -fax at 651.297.3996. Thank you. RETURN ORDER FORM NO LATER THAN JULY 11. 2012. FUEL CONSORTIUM — OVERVIEW IMPORTANT NOTE TO CURRENT PARTICIPANTS: The current Contract with Yocum Oil does not expire until January 31, 2013. Due to current market conditions, the Fuel Core Team is exploring its pricing options for a new program that will begin on February 1, 2013. To achieve this, participants MUST submit their quantities for the Fixed Price Program NO LATER THAN JULY 11, 2012. FIXED PRICE PROGRAM — The agencies participating in the Fixed Price Schedule are required to take 100% of its monthly quantity committed and the Contract Vendor is required to provide 100% of the monthly quantities contracted. The program will be for 12 months beginning February 1. 2013, through January 31, 2014. If the original purchaser is unable to take all of the monthly committed gallons, the Contract Vendor will be responsible for contacting other locations participating in the Fixed Price Contract to determine if they are able to take additional gallons. If the Contract Vendor is able to ship the unused gallons from the original participating purchaser to another participating agency, there will be no cost to the original participating agency. If the Spot Price is less than the Fixed Price, participants are not required to take more than the monthly amount they committed to. If the Contract Vendor is unable to ship the unused gallons from the original participating purchaser to another participating agency, they may sell the unused gallons on the open market and either debit or credit the difference in price back to the original participating purchaser based on the open market sell price. If the Contract Vendor is unable to provide all of the monthly committed gallons to a participating member by the due date and time, the participating member may purchase the product on the open market and charge the Contract Vendor for any actual additional costs incurred. SPOT PRICE PROGRAM. In addition to a Fixed Price program, we will include a Spot Price program for Participants to handle extra fuel needs over and above the committed quantities in the Fixed Price program. Only Participants in the Fixed Price program may use the Spot Prices offered by the Contract Vendor. Participants are not required to use the Spot Price program and may use other State Spot Price programs currently in place or may purchase their additional fuel needs independently. If the Contract Vendor is unable to provide the order quantity to a State agency or CPV member by the required due date and time, the State agency or CPV member may purchase the product on the open market and charge the Contract Vendor for any actual additional costs incurred. The signature below agrees to all terms, conditions and prices of any Contract agreement entered into on its behalf by the State of Minnesota which includes, but is not limited to, taking 100% of the monthly fuel quantities submitted for the Fixed Price Program on the Fuel Order Form. There is no requirement to take any product using the Spot Price Program. AGENCY NAME: ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE NO.: FAX NO.: E -MAIL: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: RETURN ORDER FORM NO LATER THAN JULY 113 2012. i FUEL AVERAGE COST PER GALLON DIESEL UNLEADED GAS DIESEL UNLEADED GAS FIXED RACK FIXED RACK 2000 54,378 .101,164 Data Not Available 2001 58,549 107,836 Data Not Available 2002 56,669 108,305 Data Not Available 2003 59,522 108,310 Data Nof Available `- 2004 57,021 107,847 Data Not Available 2005 61,985 107,641 Data Not Available I 55,968 102,392 Data Not Available 2007 65,059 104,461 Data Not Available 2008 62,986 103,905 Data Not Available 2009 61,450 98,007 ' $ 1'.9442 $ 1.9338 $ 1'.4500 $.1.7552 2010 60,260 91,023 $ 2.2916 $;- 2.3271 $ 2.0948 - .. 2011 58,606 97,046 $ 2.7739- $- 3.2227 $ 2.4758 $ 2.8861 2012• `22,175 46,493 $ 3.1038, $ 3.1972 $ 2.6752 $ 2.8477 CITY CI E®INA FUEL PURCHASING HISTORY June 26, 2012 YEAR FUEL AVERAGE COST PER GALLON DIESEL UNLEADED GAS DIESEL UNLEADED GAS FIXED RACK FIXED RACK 2000 54,378 .101,164 Data Not Available 2001 58,549 107,836 Data Not Available 2002 56,669 108,305 Data Not Available 2003 59,522 108,310 Data Nof Available `- 2004 57,021 107,847 Data Not Available 2005 61,985 107,641 Data Not Available 2006 55,968 102,392 Data Not Available 2007 65,059 104,461 Data Not Available 2008 62,986 103,905 Data Not Available 2009 61,450 98,007 ' $ 1'.9442 $ 1.9338 $ 1'.4500 $.1.7552 2010 60,260 91,023 $ 2.2916 $;- 2.3271 $ 2.0948 $2.1365 2011 58,606 97,046 $ 2.7739- $- 3.2227 $ 2.4758 $ 2.8861 2012• `22,175 46,493 $ 3.1038, $ 3.1972 $ 2.6752 $ 2.8477 'Notes: Through June 25, 2012 G: \PW \ADMIN \BUDGETS\ Purchasing\ Fuel \Fuel Purchasing History - Brian.xlsx a, Deisel Unleaded $119,469.04 .$118,831.84 - $637:21 $142,110.15 $172,021.89 $29,911:74 $29,274.53 $139,237.62 $141,394.60 $2,156:98 $190;674.98 $194,470.64 $3,795.66 $5,952:64 $162,567.18 $188,869.56 $26,302.37 $240,266.49 $286,084.46 $39,817.97 $66120.35 $ 68,826.77 $ 70,897.91 $ 2,071.15 $ 124,378.07 $ 132,398.12 $ 8,020.04 : $30,091.19 $111,438.70 o e v� 1 0 RE PO RURECO M M E N DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.F. From: Cary Teague, Community ® Action Development Director ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -93 Lot Division (Lot Line Adjustment) — To shift the existing lot line that divides the properties at 5100 Ridge Road and 5101 Green Farms Road for Margaret Scholz Deadline August 21, 2012 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Lot Division. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Ms. Margaret Scholz is proposing to shift the existing lot lines that divide her properties at 5100 Ridge Road and 5101 Green Farms Road. There is no new lot being created with the request, it is simply a shift in the rear lot line for each of these lots to provide a larger back yard for the home at 5101 Green Farms Road. Planning Commission Recommendation: On June 27, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Lot Division, subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2012 -93 Planning Commission Staff Report, June 27, 2012 Minutes from the June 27, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting RESOLUTION NO. 2012-93 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION OF 5101 RIDGE ROAD AND 5101 GREEN FARMS ROAD WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Parcel 1 - 5101 Green Farms Road: Lot 6, Block 3, Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Parcel 2 - 5100 Ridge Road: Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivison No. 325, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the North 63.3 feet thereof and except the South 120 feet thereof. WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: Parcel 1- 5101 Green Farms Road: Lot 6, Block 3, Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and the West 55 feet of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivison No. 325, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North of the South 120 feet thereof and lying South of the North 63.3 feet. Parcel 2 - 5100 Ridge Road: Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivison No. 325, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the North 63.3 feet thereof and except the South 120 feet thereof and except the West 55 feet thereof. WHEREAS, the requested lot line adjustment is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved pursuant to City Code Sections 850 and 810.04 Subd. 2, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further lot line adjustment be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this 17TH day of July, 2012. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-93 Page Two ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2012. City Clerk with access into carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Scherer seconded the motion. All voted A. A Lot Division request for Margaret Schultz, 5100 Ridge Road and 5101 Green Farms Road. Planner Presentation Planner Teague explained that Margaret Scholz is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides her properties at 5100 Ridge Road and 5101 Green Farms Road. There is no new lot being created with the request, it is simply a shift in the rear lot line for each of these lots to provide a larger back yard for the home at 5101 Green Farms Road. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approves the Lot Division of 5100 Ridge Road and 5101 Green Farms Road as requested on the proposed lot division date stamped June 5, 2012. Approval is subject to the following condition: 1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. Discussion /Comments Commissioner Forrest commented that this lot line rearrangement could in the future skew the "neighborhood" median; especially for lot depth. Chair Grabiel said his concern is with the odd lot line rearrangement, adding in his opinion the larger lot should accept the unusual "L" rearrangement; not the smaller lot. Grabiel said that would make more sense to him. Planner Teague explained that both lots are owned by the same person and that this is the lot line rearrangement they submitted. Teague noted that the resulting lot division meets all median lot size requirements, while one of the existing lots does not meet the lot area or depth median. Motion Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend lot division approval based on staff conditions. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Page 10 of 15 o e ril PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 27, 2012 VII.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Margaret Scholz is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides her properties at 5100 Ridge Road and 5101 Green Farms Road. (See the property location on pages Al A4.) There is no new lot being created with the request, it is simply a shift in the rear lot line for each of these lots to provide a larger back yard for the home at 5101 Green Farms Road. (See the proposed lot divison on pages A7 A8.) Surrounding Land. Uses The surrounding land uses are all single - family homes zoned and guided low - density residential. (See pages A3 —A4.) Existing Site Features Both lots contain single - family residential homes with attached garages. The home on Ridge Road also contains a detached single stall garage. There are no alterations planned for either home at this time. (See pages A4 —A6.) Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Primary Issue Low - density residential R -1, Single- family residential Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. The resulting lot line shift does not create an additional lot. The lot on Green Farms Road is currently nonconforming, as it does not meet the median lot-area or lot depth for the neighborhood. However, as a result of the lot division, the lot would become conforming. (See the table below.) All other median requirements are met as a result of the division. Compliance Table Minimum Lot Requirements Existing 5101 Green Farms Road Existing 5100 Ridge Road Proposed 5101 Green Farms Road Proposed 5100 Ridge Road Lot Area - 18,464 s.f. 17,015 s.f. * 53,878 s.f. 26,513 s.f. 44,380 s.f. Lot Width —122 feet 133 feet 172 feet 133 feet 172 feet Lot Depth —137 feet 1 127 feet* 312 feet 182 feet 257 feet "' existing noncontorming condition Any new construction on these new lots would be subject to conformance with all of the City's rules and regulations regarding lot coverage, building height, setbacks and curb cuts. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5100 Ridge Road and 5101 Green Farms Road as requested on the proposed lot division date stamped June 5, 2012. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The lot at 5101 Green Farms Road is a nonconforming lot, as it does not meet the median lot area and depth for the neighborhood. 2. As a result of the lot division 5101 Green Farms Road would become a conforming lot. 3. Both lots would meet all minimum lot size requirements. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. Deadline for a city decision: August 21, 2012 2 - r City of Edina - Legend 1970 4921 /000 IB.11 0720 1904 M2S NN 1106 NH Surrouno�ng Hause Numtrer Lobe is ian 9elke~t Pah _. -- wr7eer.Af:lr9er.ro House Number La Aels Street Nome Labels 5001 5000 5001 66b NJO $029 947 50 9319 61 .! City Limits So21 �/ creeks 500.5 wN 5009 30a' J00' 6417 6409 6405 Lake Names 24 1 5029 3009 L✓ Lakes 5009 5009 Parks 5006 3011 3012 5041 Soft 3072 F- �I Parcels 1 9012 Soft 5012 — _- -. —. —• 5012 M? So4e 3016 3045 J02f 3017 1 , 6102 5021 l016 5020 W25 3021 5029 NN SOM 5049 SM 41 3100 5100 � }1rIROr.O 6929 `- @M 5023 3101 slot 6501 - 6613 $104 5109 5015 � 5105 bas 5070 3101 0421 s1N w sift f 5680 5045 5109 5110 30/3 5117 5116 _ 3112 5113 5f52 5112 105 4 3111 Qt 3119 STr6 $120 5125 j 3120 5725 5200 5201 5300 520 $204 1 5200 S20a $110 3204 3210 5119 5173 3145 4� Cr` 3185 5195 3206 $YOB 3205 5212 STfO $209 3211 5221 9203 3213 5216 3225 5180 3215 5214 5211 $215 5170 5220 S 5200 $245 5219 dogwiAfe6Cr 1219 `lsomdrnAcNS -C¢v gc:[: _OG6fd2M 5250 $279 52i 3224 l!CII r} PID: 3011721310018 ° 5101 Green Farms Rd tiq Edina, MN 55436 ec� i � • l r n -nr ;S {, ��lHl iu 41 City of Edina Legend 5010 3000 3001 6113 5029 6547 6379 6301 S --ndmg Ho— N—b- La t. is 7071 5005 House Numher Labels 5t,—I Nti— Labels CRy L{mds /_�/ 5831 5033 5001 5009 (.•I!!ke El Lmke Nerrin woe — 0 ulue soot 5012 5011 5012 5017 El P- � Pel k w12 — w/2 5016 w11 24 5"5 501 f wf7 w/6 sm w21 ww 5G19 w2S cc 5100 a T 5100 1018 5o2 5 5101 3107 6623 51o4 57o6 sou � w70 slos 5109 5101 $112 w0S SIM 'wU' 5116 3117 S1I2 5115 5105 3111 4� SfiB $118 5110 5125 5100 5101 5100 3201 5104 5115 rAhcllS. �FQ�d%i l/J4SG6L11 e] /!, A, 41711 ;-�� _, .. PID: 3011721310018 pp`, ° p 5101 Green Farms Rd ' tia Edina, MN 55436 `•,CS q'f,.51 �t_IUI111 �� City of Edina Legend f7, Ho—,, N,,bl,1 01i Ltbels House N—Ut, Lt bets "Oil IL Street Name Labels City L-ft =031! Creeks r L.k. N.— Let.. P.O. ?M Aerial Photo IC-12 -0 �6 01' '623 �21 i2 r 108, 46+' 5105 ir. k. 12u AC 5204 J3 q;il ha 4 PID:3011721310018 5101 Green Farms Rd Edina, MN 55436 43 A, 'i - 7k o[Le,;, -Z' /14- City of Edina L! �y, �'h• - .�.= Legend SurrouriEing Hwme N —her Y• J T;� 11 - > , �! '� Labels �. ` 'c ; ,\ House N mher Lab, I, Sheet Name Laes•Is C,eeks • '�-' 1 _ '. .M>�iy. +. .4 ..`' , El Lake Names OParks ?MAerial Phew WI S 100 51Jr ^ slur AA+� X 4- Z+js A. ltt PID: 3011721310018 5101 Green Farms Rd, Q tia f Edina, MN 55436 unnl r /14- Fl As- 5-101 Grceh ram S KDot 46 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300S.Nwy.Nv.101 MWms"MN55M5 Pb— (952)614796r Fu(952)4748267 SL3RVEYFOA M. A. PETERSON SURVEYED: Augud 12,2W8 DRAFTED: Augw 13, 2008 REVISED: Mey 17,2012 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EMIRS PARCEL: ^� Lot 6, Bock 3. Perkwvvd Kmlk 22x1 Addition, H.me C—y, MlmrsaLL AND W4, —b SubWvisim No. 325, Hemep W C.mty, Mimesv4 eaupt We NoM 63.3 (ug Wveof eW uupl We SouW 120 Tut Ihraeo[ PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE WESTERLY PARCEL: Lot 6, Block 3, Puk Kmlk 22W Addinpm HmvcpW C.wy,Mimuvq aW IM Wed 55 fed of Lot 6, AWimfa Subdivuim No. M. Hemxpm Comry, Mimuou lying N-b of Wn Somh 120 f6b t thdmfrvd lyivg S— ft, NoM 663 fat thumf. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPf10N OF THE EASTERLY PARCEL: la 1, Audimfs Subdiviaim No. 125, HcvvcpW Coupry, Mimvv1a, uupt We NoM 63.3 fed tbvmfa uupl IM SouW 120 f.t Wcrtof ud p, Wr W cv 55 Rd Ibcrtof LNIITATIONS A NOTES: 1. ShowW6 We 1coBW rod dirtdiov of bouvdvy Eves of We above Iega1 devtiplivo. The scope of -ces d " 'mcmde drsvmiving wW you o wwi u a kgal rsutlu. Pleue clack the kgal dew ipvoo"yp. xcmda or -awl wild compdmt Icgil comscl, If.cusuy, to make um W. u is conrc4 avd Wal avy maven of record, smhu eaaemmu, WV you wM a6owv oo W< smvcy. Wvc bun abowa 2. g domed mporlmt. f wing pmm SS"—ng v oWmou 3 oar v" rnfy old moownevu Iv ova![ We mrvva of We Pmpcp. 6. SWwivg cl< vvsom rod conmunmv6uw WClppognphy ofWr site The ekvativoa shuxm .lain ovlY m We brnNnur4 pmv�ed ov Wia rurveY. U. IWr hexdma.k avd d.k al Irul one vWv fume sbowv m We map wlxn ddum�vivg vNV clrvauom fm use ao Iba uk. S. While we show gapoud mpmvcmmv m Your pmpvry, we mt a familiu wish Y. PL— u YOU Ve npr art weu f..]u wiWlhr xquucmmk of BOVVmteolrl agevcies u Wcu ' I mplDy.sue. Wemggulthal YOU revrtw We survey to cavfirm Wet Wepropvsrla ex what you dd ad submit We curve' m suchg vewvmlal egemies u may have j.isdicliov over Yow }rn 1 pmj r gain Weirappmvk ifyD 6. We show • proposed diviaim of We property. Plcue nvicw We ryopoui to ace Wet whu ypu meMWsubmitm WVx Bov mml rgcnvcs WU havelWSdictionm 'S2 1 I Iheu approval, if you uq bofort making eny dauiom rrgvdmg We Dropvry. O R 7, 7. While we above mvovmenu v We wmY. of We uviud dmdmg Imo, we dekr coning Wvn mtil Ib<ciry hu eppcovM We mbdivkwv eW you voufy uz. ai I I STANDARD SYMBOLS& CONVENTIONS. 1 f Demos la. ID pipe wild p— plug bang Suk Liumc Numbv 9235, s� udru � vlhmvix mkd I L ba by cavfY Wet Wu pkq apccJiuliov, upon m —y wes p F—d by m<or V A Z I under my duce mpervirim aW Wal 1— • bccvcrA Prom :sloo.1 Nngivev .pd j •Q ^ g P/ro��fessia Survg�ey.nuWd(�We u- of Ibe Svle of Mimcaov. Hme�ok kit $ I I al 21 �1 1-hn IT l7�n Pn., no H. Puk. P.E• P.S. N& 935 1 1 T i e A GRAPHIC c . O t yea w 0 Y Q N 89U5'40' E v i c4 5 89:5157' W O o , 3 -O i C Q N � N 1` - - - - -- --------r------------------- I I. I I I 71 I I i I N 8751:N' E ' N ET51'N- E ' 3 ra __.____�a_____- ^� J p I c: I I � I I I I I ----- — --------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — C C pW .......... 8 H �i Dew. No. 080,387 REV 05 17 2012 ADVANCE SVRVAANG & ENGINEERING CO. _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- 5500S.Hwy.N4101 kd'izl k MN35345 Phom(953)4747%4 Fu(951)474g2d7 _ _ _ — — — — — — — sl7RVEYFOR: M. A. PETERSON r Q l SURVEYED: An- 1; 2008 DRAFTED: Augur 13, 2008 I REVISED: May 17.2012 ; LEGAL DFSCRl N OF ENTIRE PARCEL: Lot 6, Blak 3, Pukwood KmW 22nd Adduio4 Hemcpiv Comry, Mimewu, I 3, AND I I Lot 4, Auditofa subdivwm N J25, Hemepiv Cauory, Mimaou, uupt We NoM 61.3 ( «t rhvwf aid—Pt We SouW 120 feet Ibucof I PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TIE WESTERLY PARCEL: -' Los 6, Blmk 3, Pukwcad KmN ]god Addsuo4 H.V in County, Mime.ou, aid the Wcst 55 feet of Lot 4, Auditors Subdivision No. 325, Heviepio Comry, Mimaou lywe NPM of We Soul, 120 fills fib—f aid lying Soolb of W. North 66.3 fret ffi—f PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE EASTERLY PARCEL: Lot 4, Audb -' Sobdivi.im No. J25, Heooepli Couiry, Mimuoa, aaq she NOM 63.3 fat Wvmfavd enuq We souW 120 feet Owrwf and uccq We Was ss &ct Owreo[ C ; LIMITATIONS B NOTES: L Showing We lengW aid diucnoo of l 000dwy Oyes of We above Icgal dacriprioi. The uope of urvrus does pit miliol dclumieing whar Y.. ow4 whirl u • legal manor. Plcau ch.ck We kgal dcau ipwi wiW Your ranrN or wuWr whh cimp— legal wumel, ifawsury, W make loll utvey, bane bull wiwd Was ally vurtrn of —old, wch u eucmcvu, rWt yiu wM ahowi on We i Q = 2, showing WC lncaliO of eaiwiog impmv c we doomed impirtmt. 3. S.Iing vow monumciu or verifying vld movwiciu so mark We wmen of We property. 4. Sbowing cicv 1—,od wmoou wsbow WC mpognphy ofihl ill. The elcvavom shown aku a.aar well m1YWWcbwchmahp vkdm Obh,, Y. UU Wat bemhmuk and shackvlm ioc iWa fcahuc shown oo Wa map whw daamivivg olhv ckvauoia for use oe Wis sirs NB9 JJ'b'E c'�a S. While we sbiw pwpoaW impmscovak W yiw PmPe*ry. we ml v fuoOia wild YPm Pl .,, yiu —norue w<a fionli wiW Wcaquurmcou if govcmmwW agmriesu Weir c wYCU are. Wy have lursrdicoov project to Pin Wen aP—." if You 6. We shies • pe - Wveioi of We pr.P" I,— review We praposalod submit W Owu F.!!! obuiv Weu approvals, if Ym aa4 before makeg wY dccuiom'SW'g We Property. STANDARD SYMBOLS &CONVENTIONS" " "" Liremc Numbs9235,-bola- .'B'- mad. r I hereby entity Wu Gus pk4.po.fi—oll, rcpon or survey wu prepared by me uvM mY dveet aspo' i and Ww I . a bo_l Pmfea_ Engmeu wd %l r- Pr(of�issioval Smyar/nIm�dv We laws of We Swc of Mmnewra Bmcnmark 'V YFrvee . N l H. Parka P.E & P.S. No. 923S KH ti I r, r GRAPHIC SCALE 6 ref— ifs- - -I (a Payl 0 0 p N � N i 1 i I .0 d G CJ� y N p� o I x; I I LOT S I I I I I I � I ------------------------- - - -- d W ail Dew. No. 080387 REV 05 17 2012 �gAVa •,v v • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.G. From: Cary Teague, Community ® Action Development Director Discussion Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -96 Authorizing Staff to Apply for a Grant from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development to Tear Down the Old Public Works Building at 5146 Eden Avenue. Deadline None for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing staff to apply for the grant. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development has a grant program that pays up to half of the costs for qualifying redevelopment sites. These grants include payment for the demolition of structures. Therefore, staff is requesting the City Council authorize staff to apply for these funds to tear down the existing buildings at the old Public Works site. The grant would only be for the removal of buildings and not for any additional redevelopment costs. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution 2012 -96 • Application Form RESOLUTION NO. 2012-96 AUTHORIZING STAFF TO APPLY FOR FUNDING TO REMOVE STRUCTURES AT 5146 EDEN; AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND'& FINDINGS. 1;01 The City of Edina is seeking funding to assist in the redevelopment of the abandoned Public Works site located at 5146 Eden Avenue. 1.02 The first step in the redevelopment of the site is to remove the existing structures. 1.03 The City of Edina act as the legal sponsor for the project contained in the Redevelopment Grant Program to be submitted on August 1, 2012, and that Cary Teague, Community Development Director, and Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering are hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Edina. 1.04 The City of Edina has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration. 1.05 The sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are committed to the project identified. 1.06 The City of Edina has not- violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks; collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. 1.07 Upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Edina may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above referenced project, and that the City of Edina certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements. Section 2. APPROVAL NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mayor, and City Manager, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 17, 2012. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov 952- 927 -8861. Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-96 Page Two ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2012. City Clerk FY 13 REDEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 2 2 3 3 Purpose/Background ii Funding Availability ii Deadlines/Requirements 5 Eligible Sites 6 Eligible Applicants iii Eligible Program Costs iii Eligible Bonding Costs iii Local Match Requirement iii Required Appraisals or Assessments iii Awarding Grants iv Application Cover Page Site Identification Valuation Maps and Site Features History 1 2 2 3 3 Current and Future Site Use 3 Cost Analysis 4 Sources and Uses of Funds (Budget Table) 5 Tax Increment Financing Analysis 6 Analysis of Redevelopment Potential 7 Job Creation 8 Job Retention 9 Housing Data 9 Other Public Benefits 10 Proximity to Public Transit 10 Developer /Third Party /Company Commitment 10 Project Schedule 11 Payment Information 12 Local Government Resolution 13 Redevelopment Page i FY 13 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT First National Bank Building 332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Office of Brownfields and Redevelopment 651- 259 -7449 1- 800 - 657 -3858 REDEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION * * *YOUMUST READ THE FOLLOWING NARRATIVE TO FULLY UNDERSTAND THEAPPLICATIONPROCESS * ** INTRODUCTION PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Because there is often no incentive for the private sector to redevelop old industrial, residential or commercial property when undeveloped parcels of land are available, public sector investment is required to induce private development of these difficult sites. Therefore, the Redevelopment Grant Program was established by the 1998 legislature to assist with complex and costly redevelopment projects that might not occur without public financial assistance. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §§ 116J.571 - 116J.575, the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) has the authority to award grants to assist development authorities with eligible redevelopment costs as defined below. The Redevelopment Grant Program applies only to sites where there was a past use and the need to "recycle" the land for a more productive use exists. FUNDING AVAILABILITY: Available funding amounts vary, depending on Legislative appropriation. The legislature appropriated $3,000,000 of bond funds in May 2012 for the program. According to Legislative requirement, if enough eligible applications are received, half of -the grant money will be awarded to projects outside of the seven county metropolitan area and the other half will be awarded to projects within the seven county metropolitan area. DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS: The Redevelopment Grant Program operates on a semi -annual grant cycle. The next application deadline is August 1, 2012. Completed applications and supporting documentation (3 copies) must be received by DEED's Office of Brownfields and Redevelopment by 4:00 p.m. on the due date to be considered for funding. An applicant may apply for more than one project, but an individual (separate) application must be completed for each site. NOTE: Electronic copies will not be accepted in place of paper. Please fill out the entire application. All applications must be complete upon submission in order to qualify for a grant. Missing items may disqualify you from the grant round. ELIGIBLE SITES: Redevelopment projects where there was previous development and the need to recycle the land for a more productive use exists. Sites are only eligible where there is a change from one developed use to another. Redevelopment Page u FY 13 ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS: Eligible applicants for this program are statutory or home rule charter cities, economic development authorities, housing and redevelopment authorities, counties, or port authorities. ELIGIBLE PROGRAM .COSTS: The Redevelopment Grant Program can pay up to 50 percent of the redevelopment costs for a qualifying site. "Redevelopment costs" or "costs" means the cost of land acquisition, stabilizing unstable soils when infill is required, demolition, infrastructure improvement, ponding or other environmental infrastructure and costs necessary for adaptive re -use of buildings including-remedial activities. Costs incurred before the grant award date are not eligible for payment. Some examples of eligible and ineligible costs are below. Eligible Costs Acquisition Demolition Interior abatement Infrastructure Improvements (i. e., water and sewer, standard sidewalks, lights, roads, etc.) Ponding Environmental Infrastructure Ineligible Costs Construction Contingencies Building Rehabilitation Environmental Remediation (soil and ground water) Administration Streetscape Soft costs ELIGIBLE BONDING COSTS: Currently the program is funded with $3 million of State Bond funds. State Bond Funds can only be used for,eligible costs on publicly owned sites and the subsequent development must be publicly owned and serve a public purpose. Public infrastructure costs for private development can be paid with bond proceeds. Eligible costs on private land can be used as local matching costs. Therefore, your application may include eligible private and public redevelopment costs. LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENT: It is required that the applicant pay for at least one -half of the redevelopment costs as a local match to obtain a redevelopment grant. The match can come from any money available to.;the applicant. Redevelopment costs incurred up to 12 months prior to the application due date can only be included as part of the local match. These costs must meet the redevelopment costs definition (see "Eligible Program Costs" above) and must be proven to be associated with and necessary for the redevelopment. These prior costs should be identified in the Cost Analysis budget section of the application. The applicant must complete and approve the attached resolution authorizing this application and committing the local match from the, applicant (see Page 13). REQUIRED APPRAISALS OR ASSESSMENTS: Land appraisals of the current (as-is) and expected (pre- construction) value of the site are required so that DEED can determine the fair market value and any business subsidy. Both appraisals must be done by an independent appraiser using accepted appraisal methodology. In lieu of an appraisal, the applicant may use the current and projected assessed values as determined by the local assessor. Values cannot be determined in any other manner. The value of the property after the proposed development is completed is also requested. This estimate is generally based on similar development projects in the city. Redevelopment Page iii FY 13 AWARDING GRANTS: DEED will award grants to projects that provide the highest return in public benefits for the public costs incurred and meet all of the statutory requirements. In order to evaluate the applications for public benefits with respect to the costs incurred, the law specifies priorities that DEED must consider. To fulfill this requirement of reviewing applications in an objective and fair manner, the following criteria have been assigned maximum point values in order to systematically award grants. All assigned scores will be relative to scores awarded to other applications. Please note, an application must receive a minimum of 50 points in order to be eligible for funding. 1. The need for redevelopment in conjunction with contamination remediation needs. Maximum = 15 points. 2. The redevelopment project meets current tax increment financing requirements for a redevelopment district and tax increments will contribute to the project. Maximum = 25 points. 3. The redevelopment potential within the municipality. Maximum = 90 points. 4. The proximity to public transit if located in the metropolitan area. Maximum = 5 points. Multi jurisdictional projects that take into account the need for affordable housing, transportation, and environmental impact. Maximum = 15 points (5 points each). Redevelopment Page iv FY 13 L*n qp Departmentof Employment �7I1 t1 and Economic Development in 1st National Bank Building 332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200 St. Paul, MN 65101 -1351 Redevelopment Grant Application Cover Page Applicant (Public Entity): Head of Applicant Agency (e.g. Mayor): Applicant. Address: City: Zip Code: If the applicant is a city, what form of government? Home Rule Charter Statutory City For reference, please give the State Statute number which gives the applicant authority to carry out the activities for which you are requesting grant funds. Proiect Contact for the Public Entity Phone: - - E -mail: Mailing Address: Project Manager for this project from the Public Entity,,in the event of an award Project Manager's Phone & email Application Author Author's Phone & email Provide a written executive summary of the project, including the applicant's involvement in the project to date and how the applicant intends to manage the project should a grant be awarded. Redevelopment Page 1 I. SITE IDENTIFICATION AND HISTORY SITE INFORMATION 1. K 3. Name of Site: Site Address: City, County or Township: Acreage of Site: Minnesota Legislative District # Zip Code: Sq. Ft. of Site: A B FY 13 (Note: The Minnesota Legislature has a tool to look up legislative district numbers. You must have a precise address and know the zip code of the site. Go to: http: / /www. ig s_leg mn/mgpserver /districts /index.html Is the site located within a designated Transit Improvement Area (TIA ?) *If yes, please provide Station Area name: A. Current property owner(s): When was the property purchased? From whom was the property purchased? Who will develop the site? Will the developer own the property at any time? When was /will the property be purchased? For what amount? *Yes No Yes No For what amount? C. Are eminent domain proceedings necessary to acquire the property on which the redevelopment will occur? If so, explain any difficulties anticipated in accomplishing the project. D. Who will own the site after development? When was /will the property be purchased? Provide a legal description of the site. SITE VALUATION 4. What is the current appraised or assessed value of the Site? Attach the appraisal or assessor's value. 5 For what amount? What is the projected appraised or assessed value after the redevelopment activities have been completed (prior to development)? Attach the appraisal or assessor's value. 6. What is the projected value after the proposed development is complete? Redevelopment Page 2 FY 13 MAPS AND SITE FEATURES 7. Attach an accurate and legible site and location map indicating the site showing locations of prominent and relevant site features such as buildings, retaining walls, etc. (NOTE: maps. shall include property boundaries, a north arrow and bar scale). The inap(s) should show the following: a) The current condition of the site including labeled structures; b) The proposed development of the site including. labeled structures; and c) Specifically where and for what. activities DEED, money will, apply. 8. Please provide current, and historic photographs of the site if available. HISTORY 9. Please attach a synopsis on the history and.general background of the site. This includes, but is not limited to, a description of the former and current uses of the site, as well as an explanation of what has occurred on the site, leading to its current. dilapidated condition. CURRENT AND FUTURE SITE USE 10. Zoning/Land Use: A. Current: Industrial Commercial Residential Mixed -use Other (Specify) B. After Redevelopment: Industrial Mixed -use Other (Specify) 11. Current economic condition: Vacant lot Developed site Commercial Residential Other 12. How many buildings are currently on site? Industrial How many are occupied? If vacant, for how long? Commercial . How many are occupied? If vacant,,:for,how long? Residential How many are occupied? If vacant, for how long? 13. Year building(s) was/were built: 14. Please describe the condition of the buildings on the site. Redevelopment Page 3 FY 13 15. Describe plans for existing buildings as redevelopment occurs. 16. Please attach a detailed narrative of the proposed new development plan for the site. Please include information such as the number and size of buildings and any known future tenants, etc. PLEASE NOTE: A statutory change has been made to the Redevelopment Grant Program. If your redevelopment project fails to substantially provide the public benefits listed in this application within 5 years of the grant award date, the Commissioner may require that 100 percent of the grant amount be repaid to DEED. 17. Is the proposed new development related to the bioscience field? Describe. 18. Is the new development part of an expansion of an existing Minnesota bioscience business? 19. Describe the specific activities for which DEED funds are being requested. II. COST ANALYSIS K11 21. What are the total redevelopment costs as defined on Page iii? How much money are you seeking from DEED? (Up to 50% of the total redevelopment cost is eligible) 22. Fill out the budget table on the following page indicating the sources, uses, and amounts of all funds (including TIF, DEED requests, etc.) that will be used for eligible redevelopment costs as defined on Page iii. The table should indicate the total project budget, including any costs that have already been incurred. Note: The 50% local match can come from any source. Money paid for eligible work completed up to 12 months prior to the application due date can constitute local match. If costs have been incurred, please submit the invoices for which you will be seeking to use as matching costs. Redevelopment Page 4 FY 13 Redevelopment Sources and Uses of Funds for the Project (Budget Table) Use of Funds (Activity) Public or Private land? Amount Costs Incurred (Y/N) Date Incurred Source of Funds Date Funds Committed Use of Funds (Activity) — See page iii for a list of eligible program costs. May include activities such as demolition, infrastructure improvements, etc. Be specific. Please also indicate if this activity will be performed on public or privately owned land. Amount — Total cost of the budget line item. Costs incurred — Has work on this activity started? Date Incurred — When was this work done? Be specific, give a time range if necessary. Source of Funds — Who is paying for this activity? If it will be DEED's portion, please note. Date Funds Committed — When were the funds secured from this source? Please attach any written funding commitments. Construction Sources and Uses of Funds for the Proiect (Budget Table) Construction Activity Cost Source of Funds Commitment Date Construction Activity — May include building construction or other non - Redevelopment costs. Commitment Date — If your construction financing is pending, please list the date you expect to close on your financing. 23. Is all of the financing in place for the final development of the site? If yes, you must f attach evidence that the funds are secure. If funds are not secure, what is the process to secure the funds and its timeline? Note: These tasks must be reflected on the Project Schedule. Redevelopment Page 5 III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) ANALYSIS 24. FY 13 Does the redevelopment project meet current tax increment financing requirements for a redevelopment district? 25. If the redevelopment project meets TIF requirements for a redevelopment district, describe how the site meets the requirements. 26. Check the following TIF criteria that the site meets. 27. A. Parcels consisting of 70% of the area of the tax increment financing district must be occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements, and more than 50% of the buildings (excluding outbuildings) must be structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; or B. Parcels must consist of vacant, unused, under used, inappropriately used, or infrequently used rail yards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights -of -way; or C. Tank facilities (see criteria in Minn. Stat. § 459.174 Subd. 10[3]) D. A qualifying disaster area. How much TIF will be used for the project? 28. Attach a cash flow analysis that indicates how much TIF will be used towards this project. (Note: TIF should be used at maximum levels available). 29. What is the maximum amount of TIF that can be generated? 30. Is TIF being used for this development project at maximum levels available? 31. If TIF is not being used fully, or at all, describe why. 32. Is there a gap in financing after applying TIF? If there is a gap in financing, how much is the gap? If there is a gap in financing, would DEED funding remove the gap? Redevelopment Page 6 FY 13 IV. ANALYSIS OF REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 33. Describe the current conditions of the site. 34. Describe how redevelopment of the site will improve conditions in the vicinity and/or spur adjacent development. 35. Describe the relative adequacy of the infrastructure at the site. 36. By providing hard data on current crime rates, and in a narrative, depict how the redevelopment of the site will reduce crime. 37. Has the site been found or suspected to be contaminated? If so, what measures have been taken to address the contamination? 38. What will be the.costs of the final development? Of these costs, how much will be private? public? Please discuss the source of these funds and whether or not the sources are committed. Redevelopment Page 7 FY 13 39. Have all of the required local/city approvals necessary for this project to proceed been obtained (planning commission, zoning, etc.) If not, what remains to be done and what is the process for completing the process of obtaining approvals? Include this information in the project timeline (Item #51). 40. What are the current property taxes (as determined by the County or City Assessor) for the site? 41. What are the projected property taxes after final development? How was this figure determined? JOB CREATION 42. Project the number of new jobs created after redevelopment and final development of the site. (Jobs that did not exist in Minnesota prior to development) Total New Jobs: FTEs NEW JOBS TABLE Position Title Total # of Full -Time Jobs Total # of Part-Time Jobs Part-time Hours Per Week Expected Hiring Date Redevelopment Page 8 FY 13 JOB RETENTION 43. Project the number of retained jobs after redevelopment and final development of the site. (Jobs that existed either on -site or elsewhere in Minnesota prior to development) Total Retained Jobs: FTEs RETAINED JOBS TABLE Position Title Total # of Full -Time Jobs Total .# of Part-Time Jobs Part-time Hours Per Week Former ,Location of Retained Jobs HOUSING DATA 44. If the site will be redeveloped for residential use, provide the following data: RENTAL: Total number of units Monthly rental cost per unit $ Number of affordable units* Level of affordability Construction cost per unit $ OWNER OCCUPIED: Total number of units Purchase price per unit $ Number of affordable units/homes* Level of affordability Construction cost per unit $ * Housing developments should include an affordability component Redevelopment Page 9 FY 13 . OTHER PUBLIC BENEFITS 45. Is this a multi jurisdictional project (a joint application, joint powers agreement, joint development agreement, etc.)? If so, attach a narrative and any joint agreements if appropriate. Note: Projects with other state agencies and Metropolitan Council do not constitute multi - jurisdictional projects. 46. Is there a positive environmental impact associated with this project, such as ponding or other environmental infrastructure? 47. If yes, what is the positive environmental infrastructure associated with this project? Attach excerpts from an environmental authority such as the MPCA, environmental engineers, etc, that indicate the positive impact of these environmental developments. 48. Does the project advance or promote the growth of the green economy as defined in Minn. Stat. § 116J.437 (see httpss : / /www.revisor.mn.gov/pubs/ and enter the statute number)? If yes, please describe. PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC TRANSIT 49. Attach a local transit schedule, and highlight the lines that serve the project site or surrounding area. If a regularly scheduled route does not serve the area, please provide information about other forms of transit that serve the community. DEVELOPER/THIRD PARTY /COMPANY COMMITMENT If there is a commitment from a developer or third party owner /tenant for on the site after redevelopment, please complete the following and attach a letter(s) of commitment. 50. Third Party/Company Name: Contact Person: Title: Phone Number (include area code): If there is an end -user commitment, please complete the following: 51. Third Party /Company Name: Contact Person: Title: Phone Number (include area code): Redevelopment Page 10 TY 13 V. PROJECT SCHEDULE 52. Provide a detailed project schedule outlining the individual tasks and schedules of the overall project including redevelopment tasks and activities necessary to complete the subsequent development. Indicate on this form the individual tasks involved in the project and the expected completion date (month and year) of the activity. The last task on the project schedule should indicate the date upon which construction of the subsequent development will be complete. PLEASE NOTE: A statutory change has been made to the Redevelopment Grant Program. If your redevelopment project fails to substantially provide the public_. benefits listed in the application within 5 years of the grant award date, the Commissioner may require that 100 percent of the grant amount be repaid to DEED: SCHEDULED TASKS BY YEAR AND MONTH ■■■■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ Redevelopment Activities Completion date Construction Completion date 53. Please list any factors which would change or delay this schedule. Redevelopment Page 11 FY 13 VI. PAYMENT INFORMATION Most grant payments take place through electronic funds transfer (EFT). To ensure proper payment, a Vendor Number assigned by Minnesota Management & Budget is required. Financial Contact Person: Telephone Number or e-mail: State of Minnesota Vendor Number: If a Minnesota Vendor Number does not exist, please supply: Minnesota Identification Number: and Federal Employer Identification Number: l State Vendor info may..be found at https:Hsuolibr. swift. state. mn: us /psp /finssupap /SUPPLIER/ERP/h/ ?tab =SUP GUEST Vendor number conversions from the old system to the new SWIFT may be found at: - http: / /w".swift.stafe:mn us /vendors FY 13 VII. LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION You must attach a resolution approving this application .and committing the local match from the governing body of the municipality in which the.site is located. A blank resolution has been attached for your convenience. You may chose to re- format this resolution but make sure to include all of the statements, that appear in the resolution. RESOLUTION OF APPLICANT. Applicants must adopt and submit the following resolution. This resolution must be adopted prior to submission of the application package. BE IT RESOLVED that act as the legal sponsor for project(s) (Applicant) contained in the Redevelopment Grant Program to be submitted on (Day, Month, Year) and that (Title of Authorized Official) is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that (Applicant) has the legal authority to (Applicant) apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are committed to the project identified. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that has not violated any (Applicant) Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. Redevelopment Page 13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, May enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for (Applicant) the above referenced project(s), and that FY 13 certifies that it will comply with (Applicant) all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mayor and the Clerk (for Statutory Cities), or Title of Authorized Official(s), are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Note: Do not include the proper name, only the title of the official(s). Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.201, Statutory Cities must authorize both the Mayor and Clerk to execute all contracts, whereas Home Rule Charter Cities or other public entities may differ. I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the of (Applicant) SIGNED: (Authorized Official) (Title) (Date) (City Council, County Board, etc.) on WITNESSED: (Signature) (Title) (Date) (Date) Redevelopment Page 14 01 Vu -•ruu. 188888 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.H. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE ® Action Director of Engineering F-1 Discussion Date: July 17, 2012 1:1 Information Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 6, 2012 ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the revised Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 6, 2012. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the June 6, 2012, Traffic Safety Committee Report at their June 21, 2012, meeting and made the following comments: Item A3: The ETC had a good discussion regarding the Revised Temporary Speed Table Policy. It was agreed that staff will revise the Temporary Speed Table Policy per their comments and include the revised policy in the next Traffic Safety Committee Report. Item 131: The ETC commented that West 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue speed limit is 25 -mph and this area continues to be an issue. ATTACHMENTS: Revised Traffic Safety Staff Committee Report for June 6, 2012. Draft Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2012. G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports \Item IV. H. Traffic Safety Report of June 6, 2012.doc TRAFFIC SAFETY CONIlVIITTEE REPORT (Revised June 21, 2012) Wednesday, June 6, 2012 The Committee review of traffic safety matters occurred on June 6, 2012. The Committee is comprised of staff members including the City Engineer, City Planner, Police Traffic Supervisor, Sign Coordinator, and Traffic Safety Coordinator. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the June 21, 2012, Edina Transportation Commission and then the July 17, 2012 City Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval of request: 1. Request for an all -way stop sign at the intersection of 58th Street West and Concord Avenue. The requestor has a child that goes to the school in the area (did not state which school). The requestor feels that an all -way stop sign would be beneficial to the students that walk to school. Requestor has also gathered a petition of people who would like to see a stop sign at that intersection. Traffic :counts were conducted in the area. Vehicle volumes entering the intersection from each leg were added to determine the total volume for the hour. The City of Edina policy regarding an all -way stop sign requires at least 300 vehicles per hour for any eight hours entering the intersection. Stop signs are not installed in an attempt to control speed or volume of vehicles. Given that Ahis is only a `three -way 'intersection, the required vehicle volume entering the intersection per hour was reduced to 225. Concord Avenue and 58th Street West are classified as State Aid Streets. Concord Avenue is also classified as a collector with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 2469 vehicles and an .85th percentile speed of 27.9 MPH north of 58th Street West; and an ADT of 1994 vehicles with an 85th of 30.6 MPH south of 58th Street West. 58th Street West is also classified as a collector with an ADT of 2208 vehicles and an 85th of 29.6 MPH. There has been zero recorded accidents at this intersection from 2001 to 2010. The volume of vehicles entering the intersection was also calculated. There was a total of seven hours of over 225 vehicles per hour entering in Traffic Safety Committee Report' Page 1 of 6 June 6, 2012 one day, which is only one hour short of the required hours to warrant a stop sign. This information, combined with the higher pedestrian traffic in the area, and the proximity to the school, staff does not see a problem with the placement of stop signs at all legs of this intersection. Staff recommends the approval of an all -way stop sign at the intersection of Concord Avenue and 58th Street West. 2. Request for a crosswalk at the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Schaefer Road. This request is from a resident who crosses that intersection frequently. The requestor states that vehicles are not very attentive to pedestrians and bicycles and a crosswalk will help with the safety of pedestrians. Vernon Avenue is an "A" Minor Arterial Reliever road with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 9900 vehicles. This road is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. Any recommendations will also need to be approved by them as well. City Policy on crosswalk state that crosswalks should be placed in areas that have an excess of 20 pedestrian crossing the intersection for a minimum of two hours for any eight hour period. Pedestrian counts were conducted in the area. There were a total of 20 pedestrians crossing the intersection during the time of observations. This warrants the placement of a crosswalk according to the City of Edinas' policies. Staff also recommends including the placement of a sidewalk on the north side of Vernon Avenue in the Capital Improvement Plan. Staff recommends approval to request Hennepin County to place a crosswalk at Vernon Avenue and Schaefer Road. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 2 of 6 June 6, 2012 PRIM WE PFF.M-09 ,. rM OrMUSE . , SECTION. B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request: 1. Request for an all -way stop sign at the intersection of Chowen Avenue and 58th Street West. The requestor lives near the intersection of Chowen Avenue and 58th Street West. The requestor has stated that vehicles are speeding through 58th Street, which is a safety concern. Requestor feels that bicycle and pedestrian safety is at risk due to the eastbound/westbound legs of this intersection being uncontrolled. Traffic counts were conducted in the area. Vehicle volumes entering the intersection from each leg were added to determine the. total volume for the hour. Chowen Avenue and 58th Street West are classified as local city streets. Chowen Avenue has an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 265 vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 28.1 MPH north of 58th Street West; and an ADT of 235 vehicles with ari:85th of 29.0 MPH south of 58th Street West. 50' Street West has posted Speed Limit of 25 MPH and has an ADT of 2075 vehicles with an 85th of 29.4 MPH east of Chowen Avenue; and an ADT of 2260 vehicles with an 85th of 31.5 MPH west of Chowen Avenue. There are no recorded accidents at the intersection from 2001 to 2010. The closest accident was at the intersection of Ewing Avenue sand 58th Street West (Property Damage, 2010). The City of Edina policy regarding an all -way stop sign requires at least 300 vehicles per hour for any eight hours at the intersection. Stop signs are not installed in an attempt to control speed or volume of vehicles. Volumes entering the intersection were calculated. This intersection did not have at least eight hours of vehicles entering the intersection. The highest number of hours over 300 vehicles were three in one day, which is Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 3 of 6 June 6, 2012 short of the required eight hours to warrant the placement of an all -way stop sign at this intersection. This intersection was also reviewed in 2010. It was determined at the time that placement of stop signs regulating traffic on 58th Street West was not needed due to stop signs at Beard Avenue and 58th Street West. Staff recommends denial of an all -way stop sign at 58th Street West and Chowen Avenue. 2. Request for a painted crosswalk on the northwest side of Wooddale Park. This request comes from a resident who frequents the area. Requestor did not give an address. The request is for pedestrians who would like to cross from Country Club Road into Wooddale Park. City Policy on crosswalks state that crosswalks should be placed in areas that have an excess of 20 pedestrian crossing the intersection for a minimum of two hours for any eight hour period. It is also City Policy to not place crosswalks at midblock locations. After observations were taken at the proposed area for the crosswalk, it was determined that this crosswalk would intersect a driveway on the north side of Country Club Road. Staff recommends denial of a painted crosswalk in the area northwest of Wooddale Park. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. At this time, there are no requests that are deferred. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. 1. Request for speeds to be monitored in the area of Bruce Avenue and Country Club Road. Resident lives on the street and has stated that vehicles are going, "too fast" in the area. Country Club Road is a local street with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 1305 vehicles and an 85th percentile speed of 26.4 MPH. Speed information forwarded to Edina Police Department. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 4 of 6 June 6, 2012 2. Request for speeds to be monitored in the area of 57th Street West and Drew Avenue South. Resident lives on the street and has stated that vehicles are going, "too fast" in the area. 57th Street West is' a local street with an ADT of 898 vehicles, with an 85th of 27.0' MPH. Speed information forwarded to Edina Police Department. 3. Request for speeds to be monitored in the area of the 6000 block of Olinger Boulevard. Resident,. lives on the .street and has stated that vehicles are;going, "too fast "in =the area. Olinger - Boulevard is. a State Aid street with an ADT of 1664 vehicles with an 85th of 32.9 MPH. ,I Speed information forwarded to Edina Police Department 4. Five ' calls from the same resident requesting parking restrictions on Hillside Road. Resident has stated that vehicles park on Hillside Road and are blocking access to the road. Resident was informed of the State Statute restricting vehicles parking within the vicinity . of stop signs. Resident was also informed of the placement of a sign at Countryside Park informing vehicles of the parking lot for the park. Resident was also informed that Hillside is a public street and the City of Edina does not restrict vehicles from parking on a public street unless parking restrictions are in place. This also includes streets that are under neighborhood reconstruction. 5. Call from another resident concerning parking on Hillside Road. Resident has suggested that the Parks Department to inform the parents that attend activities in Countryside Park of the parking lot on Colonial Way. Resident was informed that the Parks Department already does this. 6. Call from resident requesting'traffic counts in the area of 50th Street West and France Avenue. Requestor was. informed that the most recent count for 50th Street West had an Average Daily Traffic of 7260 vehicles with an 85' percentile speed of 22.6 MPH... 7. Call from resident concerning the proposed bike boulevard on Wooddale Avenue. Referred to Mike Anderson, Senior Transportation Engineer at Alliant. 8. Call from a resident requesting the crosswalk at 51" Street West and Halifax Avenue to be looked at. Resident was informed of the ongoing investigation of the area. 9. Call from a resident requesting traffic counts in the 4400 block of Valley View Road. Requestor was given the most recent count for the 4400 block of Valley View Road had an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 4924 vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 38.1 MPH west and an ADT of Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 5 of 6 June 6, 2012 6702 vehicles with an 85th of 36.1 MPH east of 4400 block of Valley view Road. 10. Call from a resident requesting the vegetation blocking the stop signs on 54th Street West and Wooddale Avenue to be trimmed. Referred to Sign Shop. 11. Call from a resident requesting the northbound left turn lane of Valley View Road at the intersection of 66th Street West to be looked at. The resident stated that the road condition is very poor and is hazardous to vehicles. Referred to Streets Division. 12. The area around 70th Street West from Normandale Road to Valley View Road was reviewed. Traffic counts were recently conducted to gather post - construction volumes and speeds. The counts were compared to previous counts taken. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 6 of 6 June 6, 2012 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM JUNE 21, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Schweiger, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF May 17.2012 COMMUNITY COMMENT— None. REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS Assistant city engineer Chad Millner noted that'ttseTe - ngineer will determine where the temporary speed'ta .olicies and will eliminate any that is inconsistent with Page 3, Section B — Member W Mited inquireabout Sei 25 mph and asked if the percentile, should befrc-"hanged resolved. f,. ry Speed {Tab)e Policy Process was revised to say 'The City ).be installed,e said also that staff is reviewing all traffic ���f, "�. >ota,Manual oii hiform Traffic Control Devices. 6'said'thQeport does not reflect that the speed limit is Janovy said the area keeps coming up and is not being Member Janovy arthb Temporary fSpe � Table Polib � needs^ further discussion because one was placed in her neighborhoodbuRnot for thereasons listed in the pojcya She said she did not see the connection why road reconstruction would increase s eed %n ano heWtreet and not volume and is not sure how the policy will be used in practical terms. She; ;is -,also concerned ;that the speed hump purchased previously was paid for by special assessment to a neighborhood but itrhas use in multifte' eighborhoods. Discussion ensued and included: what specifically is speed tables used for; some things'noted at last!f�je��eting was not included in the policy revision; discussion to possibly buy two �'� ///1 more speed tables; only in -plate for a season; assigned on a first come first serve basis; likes that neighbors making request was taken out because riVxreates, conflict with NTMP; policy is a good first step; everything cannot be spelled out, staff must have some discretip`n. do see cut through traffic that tend to go faster; and obvious use is for deterring traffic. rf Policy revision discussion included the following: Purpose: The purpose of a Temporary Speed Table is to provide a temporary traffic calming method for local street. that aFe •ocess: Gentact the T-Fa ff„- Safety GGGFdiRat.,- • The City Engineer may initiate the installation of a temporary speed table. • The traffic Safety Coordinator will gather the pertinent facts to help define the problem and seek a solution. 1 • The City Engineer will determine where the temporary speed table will be installed. • Contact the Traffic Safety Coordinator. Policy Delete items 2 and 5 and instead refer to engineering judgment. Chair Nelson said these changes do not address the concern of how they are paid for but from last discussion, he said it appeared the city engineer was going to find resources other than special assessment for the new purchases. How do you define significant increase? Would like to include opportunity for fire department to review and be informed where they are being placed. Fire will never approve speed table. Focus more on the process to indicate duration and if based on speed, determine the speed. Would like to see anoj�er draft. Updates Student Member - No update. DIKe Tama i dbK rvrce — wiuIULUb uI rvIay rv. curt, Member Janovy said the BETF discussed ridi gel recommending a code change to provide a basisnr handed out a memo outlining the situation, backgi review it and provides feedback at. the fnext meeting some in the community are aware t'at,pj�ing is not a BETF has discussed becoming There is a free appl a o �9m the Apple's iTunes Sto.te ;f,s ng group`of the ETC Member LaFor66 said since being` a f��e community and soli eel that the ET recently but France Avenue is for sidewalks. Member Bassrsaid Blue Cro / /,7�. Streets and the same sentiment,is strong has a responsibility to create tie, nfrast� Member Bass said there were strong seen to see how they feel now. 0 on side'iivalk which is not allowed in Edina, and she is I educatiovand,building in requirements for safe riding. She rya alysis and fecommendation and requested that the ETC ther3or not the police:,enforce this rule is not clear; however, forwarded the bylaws to them. Cycle - 'Tracks that cyclists can sign up for at Google Play Store or mbe`ro the ETC, he has learned that there are anti -bike sentiments in the .only careabout bikers. Member Janovy said the TLC Bike Blvd was approved ��lcused. Member Whited said she has learned that the same sentiment exist sue Shield has done focus groups testing on key messages around Complete ,across the country. She said it is important to start with the idea that the City f�� /Kf ucture that moves all residents, including about 1/3 of people who do not drive. ti�ments against bike lanes on W. 70th and asked if residents could be surveyed Motion was made by Member Bass and seconded by Member Iver to draft an ETC advisory communication to field a survey of resident in the W. 70th area to get a post construction survey. All voted ave. Motion carried. Nine Mile Creek Trail received grant funding of $5.5M for the Tracy to France portion. Grandview Small Area Study Chair Nelson said to date there was nothing new to report. Living Streets Working Group Update VA r Member Thompson said the group met on June 14 and the consultants shared a report that mirrored LA's Living Streets ,olicy. He said the working group will be reviewing the report and giving feedback and the rest of the ETC can also provide feedback. The consultants will be presenting their.findings and recommendation at the July ETC meeting. This will be followed by presentations to other groups to get their input. Member Janovy said there was a Living Streets related item was on the City Council agenda recently, vacation of easement in the Morningside area, and the City Council did not approve it. She said this is consistent with the Living Streets draft policy. She said further that there are right -of -ways or undeveloped land, like the vacation that was not granted, that could be used as short -cut walkways for pedestrians and they should be inventoried. She asked if they were already inventoried and staff said no. Transportation Options Working Group Member Whited said the working'. group is starting over by reviewing community needs. She said member Brown has been Vorking o around the shopping areas that he would like to present to th n Commerce, Southdale Hospital, and is in talks with Target for;=pos, Oregon. As France Avenue Pedestrian and Bike Crossings Member LaForce. gave an update on Stakeholder 1 meeting'rHsaid they did, only to be reminded in the end that they only had a smaIl;an t f rf was not sure why they took this approach: ;Memnber lyer expres constraints. Member Janovy said she felt the sam waya�d that the 4esign- aspects. Regarding the grand vision, she said. tl eAOAs { oney WX, f ,ould like whatever is done now, to be based on the,grand Visi&:;,Shi in a context based on this proJec emb r Bass saidxshe appreciate have funding for and the approach may ha�rebeen to Iet,theH/,nepir City's grand vision is for France 4', gnue. a The next stakeholder. meeti g is meeting, inc ludingeehe esi66 ^o r; CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITH ne f.a,,r rr> eir,�eharge and then they will create a checklist of IMF da street car option that could move people She',said he has spoken with the Chamber of le fuming, This would be modeled after one in h were asked toy create a grand vision, which e ;5h )u nt of money for tHWAntersections. He said he !d the same feelings considering the financial did not provide concrete information on certain n the CIP for studying the whole area and they said t 6wrban design portion was not presented the opportunity to think longer term than they county staff that was in attendance see what the Menifi lyer suggested making the agenda clearer for the next Member Janovy hande ou a memo f the ETC policy and the NTMP for future discussion or an advisory communication, with a recommendation to,eliminate them. Chair Nelson:said he spoke with city engineer Houle and he r� . �r� , suggested waiting until the Co'm ,lete Streets policy is done because other policies will become obsolete at that time. Member Janovy said waiting to do ever.- hing at once could complicate things. Motion was made by Member Janovy and seconded by Member IVer to recommend an advisory communication to the City Council recommending elimination of the ETC policy and the NTMP, which is part of the ETC policy. All voted ave. Motion carried. Member Bass said the Edina Community Education received a grant funding from Blue Cross Foundation to do a social connectedness project and they are focusing on the Parklawn Neighborhood to do a series of 'meet on the sidewalk' to �t to know the neighbors. The first meeting was last Tuesday and it was attended by the Police and Park and 2creation Departments, as well as Community Education. She said Community Education and Park and Recreation reported that this neighborhood does not use City services as much as other parts of the community so it was a good opportunity to present the services available. It was also attended by Do.Town staff who talked about the goals of the 3 project to create a healthier community. The high density apartment complexes do not have a structured playground and the nearest park is Cornelia with no safe route to get there. At the last City Council meeting, Councilmember Sprague, who was in attendance at the 'meet on the sidewalk,' motioned to have a feasibility study done to construct a playground and create a safe route to Cornelia Park. Member Whited said she formed a task force that will offer assistance or refer people to where they can help within their community instead of having to go outside of the community since Hennepin County is closing their service hub in Minneapolis and she would like to discuss this further with the ETC. Additionally, she was asked to present on alternative transportation design for Carver County and asked when was the last time Edina did a similar thing. Member Bass said past member Schold Davis did a presentation last year but it was not strictly focused on this topic. Regarding W. 56th, Member Whited said the shrubs were trimmed but the traffic is getting worst at Pizza Lola. Chair Nelson said his neighborhood had a Neighborhood Open House organised by the Do.Town staff. Approximately 15- 20 residents were in attendance and the discussion included Living St eets ,,5bump outs, place making, benches, places to meet, etc. Member Bass said it is called a Supper Club and th Vidlea is,. 0, do more residents engagement and the Do.Town staff is willing to assist with organizing around any topics,, STAFF COMMENTS Preview of 2013 Neighborhood Reconstruction Proiects rt. Assistant city engineer Millner presented the 2013 projects a said,:enopen house "'was held last fall and one is scheduled for this July. Draft feasibility studies are expected toybe g ented to the ETC h'September with public hearings in December. The sidewalk and bi Cefplans were revieUSId- and there are none planned for any of these neighborhoods. �'f �' gf Draft Sidewalk Proiects Feasibility Studies /r }lrS r�rf/' : koo f Assistant city engineer Millner presented the draft sidewalk projeUsffeasibilitysstudies that were done for City Council and they are in draft form unleity Coul finds a fund -source For`fhese projects. An informational meeting was held for the Xerxes Ave sidewalk nd three residents attenffe and he's received emails from approximately 10 others and most are not in favor of the sidewalk. He�said one resident in favor uses a scooter and she would no longer have to ride in the street. r " Regarding the W,60 sidewalk,-me .,ber La force asked aboutlan area that is already being used a cut -thru that seem like �% ffl�. it would be a natyur l path instead of the propofsed location. Assistant city engineer Millner said they would be putting pedestrians in traffi his will be discussed furthe .%hen the official feasibility study is presented. NO TLC Bike Boulevard Update� Assistant city engineer Millnetfsaid this�oJect is going through the approval process at the Federal Highways. Construction is still planned f Ir .,h s summer 1 -494 Update Start date for this project is July 23. 2012 Human Services Task Force This task force is looking for a member from the ETC. Member Braden volunteered. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet 4 ,w'91A11 ow e C0 Ay raaB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. I. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering ® Action Discussion Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: Engineering Services For Gallagher Drive Street Improvements Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for the final design of Gallagher Drive Street Improvements. Info /Background: This proposal is for the final design, including bid documents and bidding assistance, for the Gallagher Drive Street Improvements. Staff and consultant were successful in obtaining the required variance from the Municipal State Aid variance committee for the horizontal curve along Gallagher Drive. Staff is still anticipating a late August start with a project completion date of October 31. ATTACHMENTS: Engineering Proposal Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction I g: \pw \central svcs \eng div \projects \contracts \2012 \eng 12-8 gallagher ave recon \ba382 gallagher France & parklawn (petitioned) \admin \legal \item Iv.l. consultant engineering services - galloger drive.docx 0. .::, 01�I July 2, 2012 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE City Engineer City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina MN 55439 -3037 Dear Wayne: SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT RE: City of Edina Gallagher Drive and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Improvements. - Bid Documents & Bidding Assistance SEH No. ED114A 119130 10.00 At their June 28 meeting, MnDOT's State Aid Variance Committee approved the City's request for a variance to maintain the existing alignment of the horizontal curve along Gallagher. Drive. To complete the reconstruction of Gallagher Drive during 2012, the City now must complete bid documents, advertise forbids, obtain agency approvals, open bids, and award a construction contract. Enclosed with this supplemental letter agreement, please find a Task Hour Budget (THB) that describes our scope and key assumptions to assist the City with these tasks. If the City approves this Supplemental Letter Agreement, we will increase our existing hourly not -to- exceed fee for this project by $19,996.00 from $39,379.00 to $59,375.00. We will bill the City monthly on an hourly basis for labor and reimbursable expenses. We will provide our services as described in the THB enclosed with this Supplemental Letter Agreement in accordance to our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated July 25, 1988, herein called the Agreement. If; following the opening of bids, the City awards a contract for construction; SEH can submit a separate supplemental letter agreement for construction phase services. Our anticipated project production schedule is given in the table below: Key Work Items No. Description Milestone Date 1 Begin Bid Documents July 2 2 Submit Bid Documents to State Aid, the City, and other agencies for Review Jul 13 y 3 Post Bid.Documents to Qwest CDN July 20 4 Open Bids 1) August 7 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I Ymmsehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax Mr. Wayne Houle, PE July 2, 2012 Page 2 Key Worlc Items No. Description Milestone Date 5 City Council awards the construction contract . August 21 6 Begin construction September 10 Final construction completion date November 16 (1) Actual bid opening date depends on approval by State Aid. If approval date is delayed by factors beyond the City's control, bid opening date may become August 14. This Supplemental Letter Agreement; its enclosures, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing signed by both parties. Thanks again for considering SEH to continue to provide you professional services for this project. As always, please contact me with questions or comments at 952.912.2616 or tnnrse a sell ic.com. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Toby use, PE Proje Manager Enclosure c: Paul Pasko, SEH (by e-mail only) John Gray, SEH (by e-mail only) Mike Kotula, SEH (by e-mail only) Ken Taillon, SEH (by a -mail only) Justin Klabo, SEH (by e-mail only) Veronica Anderson, SEH (by e-mail only) p:lsekledina1119130U •gen1110- contractslpropo W bid doe proposAprop Itr gallagher 062912.doer Accepted on this day of 22012 City of Edina, Minnesota By: Name SEH Task Hour Budget City of Edina •Gallab her Drive_ Roadivay and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements (1) July 2, 2012 Page t of4 ESTIMATED HOURS PROJECTTASKS CLIEhT SERVICE MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER 9RANSP ENGINEFJt HATER RESOURCE. ENGINEER TRAMC SIGNAL ENG ELECPRICAL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCITI ECr CAD TECnNIC1AN ADMMTEC 1 ESTIMATED COST BID `.DOGUWNTS PHASE= ]A- Finalize:Street/ Trail Design (2) 1.1 Finalize design (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (15)•(30)(33) 1 4 1 4 6 12 Subtotal Hours 1 4 4. 6 12. 20 Snb'tot2l labor Cost FinalizeDraina a /Storm:SewerDesi 'n- 5186 S502 $G68' $950 $1,295 53,601 2:1 Drainage/Storm Sewer Design '(10 ) (11) 12)` 4 8 4 SubtothtHours 4 8 4 3.0 SubtotalLabor Cost Finalize Sanitilrv'Scwer•Dcsi 5502 S850 5432 S1.783 3.1 Finalize Design 13 1 Subtotal Hours l 4.0" Subtotal Labor Cost Finalize-Water Win -Desiggn $108 $108 4.1 Finalize Do sign (14) 1 Subtotal Hoots 1 Subtotal Labor Cost $108 $108 5d0 Bid'DOcunlentPre aration.. 5.1 Plan sheets 5.1.1 Title Shect 2 5.1.2 Tabulation ofearthwork 6 5.1.3 Tabulation ofexisting sanitary and storm sewer structure adiustments 2 5.1.4 Loop detector plan 35 - 6, 5.1.5 Tabulation of removals and miscellaneous restoration (32) 2 2 6 5.1.6 Typical pavement sections. details & list of standard plates (34) l 4 5.1.7 Stoimwater Pollution Prevention Plan (1 6) 5.1.8 Plan and Profile sheets 17 1 4 1 16 5.1.9 IbrossSection sheets 4 4 5.2 Project Manual 5.2.1 lFront End 18) 2 2 5:2.2 1 Bidding Reouirements (19 ) 1 1 Page t of4 . ,.u,..n.,y „ym,,,.cam.�wropomuow we PMPO KLW Dwine WvQgr A1MgTKB Page 2 of 4 CLUNr SERVICE 5.2.3 TRANSP ENGINEER Specifications TRAFFIC .SIGN&LENG 1 _ LANDSCAPE ARCIQrEcr CAD TBCIINICLAN 2, 1 MANAGER 2 ENGINEER 52.4 Special Provisions 1 PROJECT COST SUMMARY 2 5.2.5 BID DOCUMENTS PHASE Appendix 20 1 2 Subtotal Hours 3.0 37.0 1.0 Subtotal Hours 1 17 2.0 2 8. 2 2 40 9 $4,641.65 $19133 $2,124.20' 52,170.81 51.266.98 Subtotal Labor Cost SISC =133 519,710.08 5212 51,336 5317 S225# $4.317 $861 S%586 6:0 aantities,and Opinion -'of Probable-Cost Subtotal 6.1 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: Rine Opinion of Probable Cost and Proposal Form from Feasibility Stud 21) (22 ) ((3 1) 6.1.1 10allagher Drive 1 519.996.00 2, 6.1.2 Regional Trail 1 2 6.1.3 Storm Sewer 1 1 6.1.4 Water Main 1 i Subtotal Flours 4 6 Subtotal LaborCost $502 5648 $1,149 7.0 A cncv7tcvicw /Submittals 7.1 City of Edina 23) 7.2 Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (24) 72.1 1 Grading and Earthmovin Permit 25) 4 7.3 State Aid 1 4 4 2 7.4 Hennepin County1 7.5 Metro Transit i 7.6 MPCA 7.6:1 NPDES Pcrmit/SWPPP 2 Subtotal Hours -1 5 1 10' 1 2. Subtotal Labor Cost $186. $627 5191 51.062 $167 I $191 $2.424 8.0 Biddiri `Assisbnce. 8.1 Preparc Ad for Bids 1 8.2 Prepare Electronic Bid Documents (27) 82.1 Plans 1. 8.2.2 Project Manual 2 8.3 Respond to Bid Inquires 1 8.4 Prepare necessary Addenda 1 8.5 Attend Bid Opening. l 8.6 Prepare Tabulation of Bids 1 8.7 Print paper copies of plans and project manual 28 1 Subtotal Hours 3 G Subtotal Labor Cost. S376 5574 5950 . ,.u,..n.,y „ym,,,.cam.�wropomuow we PMPO KLW Dwine WvQgr A1MgTKB Page 2 of 4 CLUNr SERVICE PROTECT MANAGER TRANSP ENGINEER RESOURCE TRAFFIC .SIGN&LENG ELECTRICAL ENGINEER _ LANDSCAPE ARCIQrEcr CAD TBCIINICLAN ADMINTECn ESTIMATED MANAGER ENGINEER COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY BID DOCUMENTS PHASE Subtotal Hours 3.0 37.0 1.0 20.0 13.0, 8.0 2.0 64.0 17.0 165 Subtotal labor Cost $556.53 $4,641.65 $19133 $2,124.20' 52,170.81 51.266.98 $224.90 $6,907.68 $1,626.01 519,710.08 Subtotal SEH Expenses 29 S 285.92 Subtotal 519996.00 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: 519.996.00 . ,.u,..n.,y „ym,,,.cam.�wropomuow we PMPO KLW Dwine WvQgr A1MgTKB Page 2 of 4 iNOTES 1 Tree removal shall only become necessary in extreme circumstances of reconstruction wherc;no other.feasible option exists to mitigate damage caused by reconstruction activities. 2.SEH will use information provided in the the fcasibilitystudydated April 12,2012 as the basis_ from .which to start final-dcsign tasks. 3. A final, horizontal alignment and stationing will be selected. -4 A final vertical alignment will be selected. We will use the Citys.topographic survey.information to to.match.the existing pavement/mill and overlay limit elevation on the cast/south side of Gallagher Drive wherever possible. Since Gallagher Drive's remaining pavement will be milled and overlaycd; existing roadway cross slopes will be maintained. 5 Crate intersection grading plans. These plans will not appear in the bid document plan set instead.thcy will be utilized in the field by SEH surveyors staking -the reconstruction. 6 Includes tabulation of removals and miscellaneous restoration for State Aid plan review - Tabulation includes sawcutting; sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement removals-. and mill and overlay and restoration areas. 7 Tabulation of earthwork for insertion into.thc bid documents. Includes information separated between the trail and Gallagher Drive regarding gross common excavation; reclaim aggregate base production and.placemcnt mill and overlay, imported class 5 aggregate base, subgmde repairs, paving, topsoil borrow; and sodding. --8 SEH will finalize the street / trail design utilizing the proposed typical section shown in the feasibility study dated April 12, 2012: 9 Includes final design ofthe France Avenue / Gallagher Drive intersection relative to loop detcctor operation since the south side of Gallagher Drive's curb and gutter will be shifted approximately 2:5' north in order to fit the regional trail within the ROW. i- 10 'Complete the detailed design of storm sewer modifications shown inthe feasibility study. I I Assumcs no catch basin reconstruction / adjustments on the west/north side of Gallagher.Drive are included.in theprojwfs :scope. 12 Includes swale design that incorporates infiltration capabilities and curb cuts along the concrete curb and gutter on the east /.south side of Gallagher Drive. 13 Sanitary sewer trunk and service pipe repairs arc not included in the scope of this project. Includes identiying adjustments required to existing sanitary sewer manhole castings to match proposed g ides. 14 Water main trunk and service pipe repairs and hydrant removals are not included in the scope of this project Include identiying adjustments required to existing gate valve castings'and hydrants to match proposed grades. i 15. Includes addition of future trail lighting conduit to the project scope, SEH wll.recommend the proper location and type of lighting conduitto be installed along the cast/south'side of the corridor for purposes providing future lighting to the regional trail: Lighting conduit will be cvaluatcd for required street crossings based on the configuration of thc existing power system in the area 'to deter' mine the appropriate power source location to operate the future trail lighting system. 16 Includes having SEH water resources staffreview the SWPPP for any - recent rule changes prior :to - submitting to the MPCA. 17 Plan view base mapping is based on line work :from City topographic surveying. No aerial photos will be included on the bidding documents.. 18 .Contains title sheet, certification sheet, table of contents, contact shceC instructions to bidders, and advertisement forbids: 19 Includes proposal 'form, instructions to bidders, and advertisement for bids 20 Contains soil boring data, City standard plates, and SEH construction, details. 21 Costs will be computed.in 2012 dollars. 22 Use same applicable cost splits shown in the Feasibility Study. for City/MSAffhreeRivers Park District 23 includes one (1) submittal ofdraft final bidding.doeumcnts to the City in;pdffonat. n. 24 We assume the entire project.area is.located,inthe Nine ]Nile Creek Watershed.District and that the:project will not result in a net increase in impervious surfaces. Thcretbre, stormwater management is riot required for this project 25 SEH will prepare one (1) submittal. letter transmitting review documents to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. 26, Does not include pre -bid- meeting. 27 Bid.documents'will be available for purchase via Quest CDN on the City's .web site. 28 Print only enough copies for appropriate City and SEH staff. ' 29 Reimbursable expenses during study and bid document bidding assistance phase includes mileage and printing costs. 30,Task will evaluate bus tumin&movcmcnts at intersections, review`of sight lines at the horizontal curve; and driveway accesses. 31 .Quantity calculations will be captured in a XLSX file that will be incorporated into the monthly pay applications utilized during rcconslructionto track quantities and costs for each funding source allocated. for the project Page 3 of 4 32 We understand the City and the owner of the Cedars apartment complex have. an agreement in place regarding this project's restoration scope witbinthe area of the Cedars apartment complex As part of this project, the City will cover Gallagher Drive's restoration up to and including topsoil and mulch;within the ROW. The owner of the Cedars apartment complex will restore Gallagher Drive's ROW in 2013 to match existing landscaping present at the site. SEH assumes. no landscaping design, restoration plan or coordination with the owner of the Cedars apartment complex within the Cedars apartment complex area All other areas within the Gallagher Drive ROW are assumed to receive topsoil and sod. 33 Assumes no design of sidewalk or concrete curb and gutter on the west/ north side of Gallagher Drive will be required. 34 Includes bike rack detail for each bus stop along Gallagher Drive. 35 Since Gallagher Drive's curb line will be shifted approximately 2.5' north at the France Avenue intersection to incorporate'thc.Regional Trail within the existing ROW, our plan shall, include removal and replacement of four (4) existing loop detectors and a handholc casting at the France Avenue intersection. Assumes Hennepin County will not require signal head modifications as part of this project If signal head modifications arc required, SEH will submit a separate Supplemental Getter Agreement to the City. Page 4 of 4 t, \AbAb. REPORT /RECOMMEN DATInN To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. J. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering ® Action F-1 Discussion 0 . Information Date: July 17, 2012 1 — Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -98 Adopting Findings And Decision Regarding Valley View Road And Sally Lane Recommendation: Adopt attached Resolution No. 2012 -98 Adopting Findings And Decision Regarding Valley View Road And Sally Lane. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2012 -98 g: \pw \admin \comm \external \general corr by streets \s streets \sally lane' vegetation issue \item Iv. J. resolution no 2012 -98 adopting findings and decision regarding valley view road and sally lone.docx a RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -98 ADOPTING FINDINGS AND DECISION RE: VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND SALLY LANE TREE REMOVAL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 City Council and staff received complaints from neighborhood residents relating to impaired sight lines at the intersection of Sally Lane and Valley View Drive. 1.02 City staff consulted with traffic engineers at WSB and Associates who performed an analysis of the sight lines at the intersection. 1.03 On September 30, 2011, WSB made its written report to City Engineer Wayne Houle. 1.04 The WSB report recommended the removal of all of the plantings in the Valley View Road right of way east of its intersection with Sally Lane located adjacent to 7025 Sally Lane. The plantings consist of six spruce trees located closest to the intersection and twenty -one arborvitae trees located further back from the intersection. 1.05 The WSB report also recommended the removal of three trees located in the Valley View Road right of way west of its intersection with Sally Lane adjacent to 7028 Sally Lane. 1.06 According to the WSB report, the removal of these trees are necessary to bring the intersection into compliance with the decision site distance standards in the MnDOT Road Design Manual Chapter 2- 5.08.04. 1.07 Doug and Jill Benner are the owners of the home located at 7025 Sally Lane. Wayne Alexander is the owner of the home located at 7028 Sally Lane. 1.08 On September 30, 2011, City Engineer Wayne Houle sent Mr. and Mrs. Benner and Mr. Alexander the WSB report and advised them that it would be considered at the City Council's October 4 meeting. 1.09 On October 4, 2011, the City Council approved a motion requiring the adjacent property owners to remove the trees identified in the WSB report as interfering with the site lines at the intersection of Valley View Road and Sally Lane. 1.10 On October 14, 2011, City Engineer Houle sent a letter to the Benners and Mr. Alexander notifying them that they were obligated to remove the offending trees within 30 days. 1.11 On October 30, 2011, the Benners submitted a letter to the City Council, along with a report . from consulting engineers RLK Incorporated, asking the Council to rescind the notice requiring removal of the trees. 1.12 At its November 1, 2011 meeting, the City Council suspended the 30 -day notice until December 6, 2011 for a legal review by the City Attorney. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN..gov • 952 = 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Resolution No. 2012 -98 Page 2 1.13 At its December 6, 2011 meeting, the Council revised its position and voted to require the delimbing of the spruce trees closest to the intersection to a height of eight feet, with the arborvitaes remaining. 1.14 At its December 20, 2011 meeting, the Council reaffirmed its position that the spruce trees be delimbed to a height of eight feet. 1.15 At the City's initiative, City representatives and the Benners engaged in mediation. Benners have continually refused to either remove the trees in the right of way or to delimb the spruce trees closest to the intersection. Section 2. FINDINGS. 2.01 All of the trees identified in the WSB report limit the site distances at the intersection of Sally Lane with Valley View Road and adversely impact safety at the intersection. 2.02 The WSB report utilizes the. accepted MnDOT Road Design Manual standard and the presumptive ten second decision time standard for drivers on Sally Lane at the Valley View intersection. The WSB report assumes a 20 mph approach speed of vehicles on Valley View Road. 2.03 The report prepared by RLK at the request of Mr. and Mrs. Benner does not dispute the fact that the application of the presumptive ten second decision time standards and the 20 mph approach vehicle speed requires the removal of all the trees planted in the right of way adjacent to the Benner property to meet the required sight line distance. 2.04- The RLK report states that the existence of the trees in the right of way still allows a 200 foot stopping distance for vehicles on Valley View Road to avoid a vehicle entering the intersection from Sally Lane. The RLK report recommends the installation of signs on Valley View Road to warn drivers of the approaching Sally Lane intersection. 2.05. WSB reviewed the RLK report. In its November 21, 2011 memorandum to City Engineer Houle it summarizes the difference in its approach from the emergency stopping analysis performed by RLK. The WSB memorandum states: Stopping Sight Distance versus Intersection Sight Distance: RLK mentions the stopping sight distance criterion of 200'. This is a last resort way of avoiding an accident. Which means the approaching motorist locking up the brakes to avoid a collision. 200' of sight distance only allows for 4.5 seconds of decision making time, which is less than the 6.5 second Highway Capacity Manual default for driver gap acceptance. This is also assuming the approaching vehicle is not accelerating. 2.06 The City Council believes that the appropriate decision from a safety standpoint is to eliminate the' sight distance impairment for vehicles turning onto Valley View Road from Sally Lane rather than leave that safety hazard in place and rely on the ability of drivers on Valley View Road to make an emergency stop to avoid a collision. 2.07 The Council is appreciative of the fact that the removal of the trees will have some impact on the Benners' property. However, the trees are clearly within the City's Right of Way. There are plantings and other landscaping that can be done on the Benners' property to mitigate the impact of the tree removal. Resolution No. 2012 -98 Page 3 2.08 When issues are brought to its attention, City staff and the Council have the legal right and obligation to address safety issues caused by obstructions existing in its Right of Way. Section 3. DECISION. The City Attorney is directed to take all necessary legal steps to cause the removal of all the trees adjacent to 7025 Sally Lane and 7028 Sally Lane properties identified in the WSB report as interfering with the sight line standard. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota on July 17, 2012 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA James B., Hovland, Mayor COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )ss. CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. City Clerk - - ---- 165259v1- - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - .;,.,- of flu REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV. K. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering ® Action Discussion Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -99 Designating No Parking on From Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue Gallagher Drive ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt attached Resolution No. 2012 -99 designating No Parking restrictions on Gallagher Drive from Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Council authorized staff to pursue a variance for the proposed layout that was presented at the May 15 Public Hearing. Staff and consultant have acquired the variance and are now preparing the construction plans for this project. Gallagher Drive is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadway that requires a no parking resolution due to utilizing MSA funds to rehabilitating the roadway. Currently, no parking exists along Gallagher Drive and staff has not located a resolution authorizing the required parking restrictions. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2012 -99 G. \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PR0JECTS \C0NTRACTS \2012 \ENG 12$ Gallagher Ave Recon \ADMIN \MISC \Item W.K. Resolution No. 2012 -99 Designating No Parking on Gallagher Drive from Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue.docx RESOLUTION NO.. 2012-99 FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON GALLAGHER DRIVE FROM PARKLAWN AVENUE TO FRANCE AVENUE (CSAH 17) WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the improvement of Gallagher Drive from Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue (CSAH 17), State Aid Project.-No 120 -170- 003; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvements on Gallagher Drive; and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon, certain restrictions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council shall ban parking of motor vehicles on both sides of Gallagher Drive from Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue (CSAH 17), at all times. ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen; City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that,the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the' Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of -120 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371. Fax 952- 826 -0392 City Clerk REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VI.A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: July 18, 2012 Subject: New On -sale & Sunday Sale Intoxicating Liquor License — P.F. Chang's China Bistro, 2700 Southdale Center Recommendation: Motion approving New On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Sunday On -Sale Liquor License to P.F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. dba P.F. Chang's China Bistro, for the period beginning July 18, 2012 and ending March 31, 2013. Info /Background: P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. dba Chang's China Bistro at 2700 Southdale Center has applied for new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses. The reason for the new license is a new corporate structure that constitutes a new licensee. They have filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the licenses. Edina Code requires a public hearing before the issuance of a new liquor license. The proper notification has been published in the Edina Sun Current. The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation. Attached is Sgt. Draper's memo stating the findings of the Police Department's background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. • BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY �� ON -SALE WINE /OFF OR ON SALE 3.2 BEER INTOX LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION Establishment: P. F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. License: Liquor License Investigator: Sgt. Tom Draper On May 30, 2012, P. F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. made application to the City of Edina for a new Liquor License operating as P.F. Chang's China Bistro at 2700 Southdale Center, Edina MN 55435. P. F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. is incorporated in the State of Minnesota and the State of Delaware. The Minnesota Secretary of State and the Delaware Secretary of State report they are in good standing. Officers of P. F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. are: CEO /Director Scottsdale, AZ CFO Scotttsdale, AZ Richard L. Federico Mark D. Mumford The listed officers partners have been investigated and were found to have no criminal records. Checks were made with the following agencies. NCIC MINCI S Hennepin County Ramsey County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Liquor Control Board Personal and business references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent P. F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. from obtaining a Liquor License. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. O lase // REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No.VI.B. From: Cary Teague, Community ® Action Development Director Discussion ❑ Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding building height, Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1 to PUD and Preliminary Development Plan for 4005 West 65th Street and 6500 France Avenue for Mount Properties, Resolution No. 2012 -94 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment) and Resolution No. 2012 -95 (Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan) Deadline September 18, 2012 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED:. Adopt the attached Resolutions approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. The Council is also asked to make a determination if a small area plan is needed, prior to rezoning. As demonstrated on Page A7 of the Planning Commission staff report, the site is located in a "Potential Area of Change" within the Comprehensive Plan. Prior to any rezoning of land within these areas, the City Council is required to make a determination if a small area plan is needed. The Planning Commission recommends that a Small Area Plan is not needed in this case, since the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Mount Properties is proposing to tear down the existing office buildings at 4005 West 65th Street and 6500 France Avenue to build a new six -story, 81 -foot tall, 102,406 square foot medical office /retail building with a detached 5 -level parking ramp. The project is proposed to be developed in two phases. The first phase would be the construction of a 4 -story, 69,456 square foot medical office with a 3-level detached parking ramp. The second phase would add two levels to each structure. The first floor of the new building would contain 7,000 square feet of retail space including a coffee shop, barber shop and medical supplies. The next four levels would contain 62,310 square feet of medical office. (See property location on pages Al —A4; and the applicant's narrative, building rendering and plans on pages A19 —A68 of the attached Planning Commission staff report.) In order to obtain the above - mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two - step process. The first step in the process is to obtain the following approvals: 1. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow a building height of 6 stories and 81 feet on this site. The Comprehensive Plan requires a maximum height of 4 stories or 48 feet; (This requires a four -fifths vote of the City Council for approval.) 2. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and 3. Preliminary Development Plan. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan are approved by the City Council, the following is required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to PUD. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. The Planning Commission considered and recommended denial of a proposal for just the 6500 France site to construct a 5 -story building on the site. (See Planning Commission minutes on pages A98—Al 07 of the Planning Commission staff report.) The applicant elected not to go before the City Council for review, after the denial; rather, they attempted to address the comments made by the Planning Commission, including acquiring the property to the west to include within this re- development request. Planninq Commission Review: On June 27, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. Vote: 7 Ayes and 0 Nays. (See the attached minutes.) The Planning Commission added the following conditions to the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan, which have been included in the attached Resolution: Condition 1.a. be removed. _ , 2. The retail space on the ground level must have door openings facing France Avenue. These must be shown on the Final Development Plan submittals. The applicant has submitted revised plans to show entrances for the retail space that face France Avenue. (See attached.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2012 -94 approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Resolution No. 2012 -95 approving the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan • Revised Plans date stamped July 6, 2012 • Planning Commission Staff Report, June 27, 2012 • Draft minutes from the June 27, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting RESOLUTION NO. 2012-94 RESOLUTION APPROVING A GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM 4 STORIES AND 48 FEET TO 6 STORIES AND 81 FEET AT 6500 FRANCE AVENUE AND 4005 WEST 65TH STREET FOR MOUNT' PROPERTIES i BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mount Properties is requesting Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to allow a six- story; 81 -fo6t tall medical building to be built at 6500 France Avenue and 4005 West 65th Street. 1.02 The Edina Comprehensive Plan currently allows buildings to be a maximum of four - stories and 48 feet tall for,these properties. 1.03 On June 27, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Guide Plan Amendment. Vote: 7 Ayes and 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed height is consistent with adjacent buildings to the south and,east. To the south, the Point of France building is 13 stories and 123 feet tall. To the east, Fairview Southdale Hospital is 8 stories and 124 feet tall, and Southdale Medical Center is 6 stories and 92 feet tall. 2. The building. includes a podium height of two- stories along the street, which would give pedestrians on the sidewalk in front, a feeling that the building is not as tall. 3. The proposed plan would meet the density requirement of a 1.0 floor area ratio. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the guide plan amendment for the following described property: All of. Lot 4 and the Easterly 56.44 feet of Lot 3, Block 2 Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.goy e 952 -927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 7RESOLUTION NO. 2012-94 Page Two - Lot 3, Block 2, except the Easterly 58.44.feet thereof, Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County Minnesota. Approval is subject to the following condition: 1. Final Rezoning to PUD and Final Development Plan approval for a medical building. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -95 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD -1, PLANNED .OFFICE DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FOR 6500 FRANCE AND 4005 WEST 65TH STREET FOR MOUNT PROPERTIES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mount Properties is requesting a rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1 to PUD, Planned Unit Development to allow a six- story, 817foot,tall "medical building and detached parking ramp to be built at 6500 France. Avenue and 4005 West 65th Street. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: I All of Lot 4 and the Easterly 56.44 feet of Lot 3, Block 2 Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And Lot 3, Block 2, except the Easterly 58.44 feet thereof, Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County Minnesota. 1.03 On June 27, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan.. Vote: 7 Ayes and 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The. proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street. , 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, glass and concrete. A four story building would be generally consistent with the four story buildings on West 65th Street. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 w�vw.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-95 Page Two 5. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. ■ Locate prominent; buildings to visually define comers and screen parking lots. ■ Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to. any entries oriented towards parking areas. . ■ Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. ■ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) C. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City. Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning to. PUD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan subject to the following conitions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated May 29th and June 18, with the following revisions: a. The retail space on the ground level must have door openings facing France Avenue. These must be shown on the Final Development Plan submittals. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A23 -A27 of the staff report. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-95 Page Two 3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated June 19, 2012. 5. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 6. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 17, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 17, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2012. City Clerk MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL rHAMRFRc JUNE 27, 7:00 P I. Acting Ch *t� unton called the meeting of the 7:00 PM. �� II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll ca ere Commissioners Sc Staunton and Grabiel \ sion to order at Forrest, Potts, Platteter, Fischer, Capenter and Cherkassy Absent from the roll: Schro�de� r III. APPROVAL OF MEETINGAG NDA Meeting Agenda was approved as sub fitted. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner/Ficher moved approval of thc,June 13, 2012, meeting minutes. Commissionet Fischer seconded the motion: C mmissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All/voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMN No cents. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD for Mount Development Co. 6500 France Avenue and 4005 West 65th Street. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Mount Properties is proposing to tear down the existing office buildings at 4005 West 65th Street and 6500 France Avenue to build a new six - story, 81 -foot tall, 102,406 square foot medical office /retail building with a detached 5 -level parking ramp. The project is proposed to be developed in two phases. The first phase Page 1 of 15 would be the construction of a 4- story, 69,456 square foot medical office with a 3 -level detached parking ramp. The second phase would add two levels to each structure. The first floor of the new building would contain 7,000 square feet of retail space including a coffee shop, barber shop and medical supplies. The next four levels would contain 62,310 square feet of medical office. In order to obtain the above - mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two - step process. The first step in the process is to obtain the following approvals: 1. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow a building height of 6 stories and 81 feet on this site. The Comprehensive Plan requires a maximum height of 4 stories or 48 feet. 2. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and 3. Preliminary Development Plan. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan are approved by the City Council, the following is required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to PUD. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. The Planning Commission considered and recommended denial of a proposal for just the 6500 France site to construct a 5 -story building on the site. The applicant elected not to go before the City Council for review, after the denial; rather, they attempted to address the comments made by the Planning Commission, including acquiring the property to the west to include within the development, revised their plans, and are now back again before the Planning Commission for review of a PUD. Planned Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the following: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow a 6- story, 81 -foot tall building on the site. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed height is consistent with adjacent buildings to the south and east. To the south, the Point of France building is 13 stories and 123 feet tall. To the east, Fairview Southdale- Hospital is 8 stories and 124 feet tall, and Southdale Medical Center is 6 stories and 92 feet tall. Page 2 of 15 2. The building includes a podium height of one -story along the street, which would give pedestrians on the sidewalk in front, a feeling that the building is not as tall. 3. The proposed plan would meet the density requirement of a 1.0 floor area ratio. Preliminary Rezoning to Planned Unit Development Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned unit development. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street. 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, glass and concrete. A four story building would be generally consistent with the four story buildings on West 65th Street. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. 5. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan- a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front fagade. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) Page 3 of 15 c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Preliminary approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated May 29th and June 18, with the following revisions: a. The parking ramp must be finished on all elevations to match the cornice on the medical building and the stair and elevator tower on the parking ramp. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A23- A27 of the staff report. 3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler, systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated June 19, 2012. 5. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 6. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. Appearing for the Applicant Stephen Michals, Mount Development Co., Ed Farr, Edward Farr Architects and Mark Rausch, Alliant Engineering Initial Discussion f Comments Commissioner Staunton noted that Planner Teague did a zoning code comparison for PUD from POD -1 and asked Planner Teague if he ever did a comparison if the site were rezoned to Regional Medical, not PUD. Planner Teague responded he did and found that the zoning requirements are basically similar; setbacks based on building height etc.; however, there is a change in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) . Under Regional Medical the FAR would comply. Commissioner Potts asked Mr. Rickart his impression on how the revisions to the plan and the acquisition of the property to the west impacted traffic and circulation. Rickart said he analyzed the site at full build out, adding one difference as the result of the land acquisition was access was changed from one to two. Rickart said in his opinion the two full movements off West 65th and the additional movement on France are a benefit. Continuing, Rickart said the analysis indicated that this change may have diluted the traffic; however, the Level of Service (LOS) for this area does indicate some delays with a D rate. Rickart further explained the LOS is a grading system from "A" to "F ". This describes the Page 4 of 15 average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Rickart what triggers signal improvements. Rickart responded that improvements to signalization are usually the result of delays and then it becomes a timing issue. Rickart said they would work with the County on the timing of the traffic signals to ensure adequate vehicle movements. Chair Grabiel asked Planner Teague to clarify for him if the Commission acts this evening is the Commission voting on the entire build out. ,Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. He explained the approval process is a two part process; however, when the second phase proceeds site plan review would be required. Applicant Presentation Mr. Michals addressed the Commission reporting as per the suggestion of the Commission that Mount Development acquired the office building to the west. Continuing, Michals delivered a power point presentation highlighting the revisions to the plans since the Commission last viewed the proposal. Revisions are as followed: • Acknowledge as per the Commission comments that this corner can be considered the "gateway" to the Southdale area. • Note the revised proposal is slightly below the suggested FAR maximum of 1.0 identified for this Regional Medical District. • Joining the two parcels was advantageous; however 6- levels are needed to offset the cost of the acquisition. • The project would be developed in phases. Phase 1 would consist of removing the buildings and constructing a new four story rentable medical office building with a detached 3 -level garage. Phase 2 would add two stories to the medical office building with the possibility of expanded the ramp another two levels. Phase II can be accomplished while the building is open. Ed Farr addressed the Commission informing them he was delighted when the development team acquired the additional property to the west. Farr said joining the parcels created advantages to the site layout. Farr highlighted the following: • Relocation of the building access from France Avenue to West 65th Street • Two entrance /exit points off West 65th Street and one off France Avenue • A dedicated delivery area for the building along with the visitor entry drop -off circle at the front door was created and is a huge plus. This access is a "home run" for a medical office building because it's so important to get customers to the "front door ". • Increased building setbacks. • Low slung parking structure with one level completely underground. Page 5 of 15 • Parking spaces are proposed at 9 -feet; however, can be downsized to 8'6" to gain more parking stalls. • Proof of Parking Agreement. • Retain the already mature landscape buffer between Point of France and add additional coniferous trees and over -story trees along south yard. • Green roof areas with decorative railings. • All ramp openings are louvered. • Respectfully request that condition 1. A. with respect to the dark cornice that the dark cornice not be extended to the ramp. Mr. Farr submitted for review the exterior building materials. In conclusion Mr. Michals noted at the last meeting before the Planning Commission the development team was asked how the community benefits from the new project. Michals indicated the following benefits: • 6500 France and 4005 65th St. buildings would be removed with both law firms relocated into the community. Retains the current jobs. • Proposal is consistent with the guide plan. • The building is designed to allow cross referrals among clinics. • Create a pedestrian environment along France Avenue. • Green building practices. • Green roof. • Alternative transportation. • Real estate tax benefit. • 70 new medical staff positions noting construction jobs during the construction of the building. • Storm water management. • Building exterior has been enhanced. • Carbon Impact Analysis. • Ramp Enhancements. • Extensive landscaping, streets plantings and an area for art. Art will be commissioned for the center area. Follow -up discussion Commissioner Staunton said he was very glad to see that the "orphan" property has been added to the development site, adding acquiring that of property eliminated a major concern for him. Staunton said another question is why the building is proposed to be built in phases. Mr. Michals responded that in his opinion it isn't prudent to have "empty real estate ", adding he believes the Southdale area can handle about 30,000 square feet of new medical office space per year. Continuing, Michals said it's important that Phase 1 is completed and leased before beginning Phase II. Michals noted the leasing cycle is roughly a 2 -year cycle. Concluding, Michals said he isn't sure when Phase II would be constructed. Page 6 of 15 Commissioner Staunton noted that he recalls reading in the applicant narrative that it's possible that a pedestrian bridge /skyway could be built between the proposed parking ramp and office building in the future. Staunton asked if this was still the case. Mr. Farr responded in the affirmative: Commissioner Platteter acknowledged the acquisition of the lot to the west, adding he was very happy to see that occur because in his opinion the original proposal was just too tight. Continuing, Platteter asked if it's realistic to add two stories to an occupied building. Michals responded that is isn't easy; however, it can be done. Continuing, Platteter said he didn't see store front openings along France Avenue, adding that's a disappointment to him. Platteter said he agrees with past discussions that acknowledged that this corner was an important corner in the Greater Southdale area, pointing out that in eliminating the front door off France Avenue the corner now lacks "punch ". Platteter commented that France Avenue and this corner need to be showcased. Platteter stated he likes the access circulation and ramp circulation for the most part; however, he said he thinks more handicapped parking stalls are needed and, barriers constructed within the "center" establishing pedestrian safety. Platteter also added they need to pay close attention to the loading dock area so people don't become confused. Concluding, Platteter encouraged the applicant to continue to think about adding a pedestrian bridge /skyway over West 65th Street connecting this corner with the corner across the street thereby creating access to the Fairview Southdale Hospital. Commissioner Fischer said he agrees this proposal is an improvement from the previous proposal and also agrees with Mr. Farr that the darkened cornice should not be continued to the ramp. Fischer also suggested that a lighter color be used on the parking ramp louvers. He said he understands with the darker louvers it gives the appearance of windows; however, creating an airy feel to the parking ramp is best, not drawing attention to a parking ramp is always a good thing. Commissioner Fischer stated that the landscaping plan is good, but he continues to be concerned with pedestrian movement and the pedestrian environment. Fischer said he doesn't want this corner to "fall flat" and as mentioned by Commissioner Platteter the omission of doors to the retail spaces inhibits pedestrian movement and reduces the appeal of the facade from France Avenue. Concluding Fischer said he also is a bit concerned about the shallowness of the podium green /roof area, but understands the challenges. Commissioner Forrest stated she also likes the layout presented this evening better than the previous layout, acknowledging the importance of acquiring the lot to the west. Forrest said she was disappointed with the fagade of the building (along France Avenue) adding she thought the previous fagade was more attractive and attention getting. Continuing, Forrest said attention should be paid to signage, adding she wants the bicycle area easily identified. Concluding, Forrest said she likes the outdoor art elements and suggested they continue to the lobby area. Page 7 of 15 In response to comments from Commissioners Mr. Michals said that there will be specific areas designated for bikes. The lobby area is large and art would be used in the lobby as well as on each floor, adding they have an art budget. Michals also reported they are working with tenants that desire doors, adding the option of adding doors is very good. Michals said he would take all comments on signage, skyways, loading dock areas, louvers, etc. under advisement. Public Comment Marilyn Kemme, 6566 France Avenue, told the Commission the applicants met with the owners of Point of France on June 14, adding they were pleased with the revised plans, but would like the height of the building to be limited to 4- stories not the 6- stories as proposed. Kemme said the neighbors on the north side of the building are opposed to a 6 -story building. Gary Lichliter, 6566 France Avenue echoed Ms. Kemme's comments, pointing out approval is being requested for all 6- stories, even though they are indicating at this time that they would only build 4- stories in Phase I. Lichliter noted if approval were given for the full build out nothing would stop them from building the building at 6- stories at first; not 4. John Windhorst, 6566 France Avenue said in his opinion the 4 -story building is very attractive; however those additional two stories will have impact. Windhorst encouraged support for 4- stories. Mark Waterston, 6566 France Avenue said his worry continues to be with emergency vehicles and traffic congestion. Waterston said in reality this neighborhood is a residential neighborhood; not medical office as proposed. Mary Kramer, 6566 France Avenue said her biggest concern is with traffic. This building will add additional traffic to an already congested area. Norman Gurstel, 6566 France Avenue, said his concern is with property values, adding he believes the property values will be lowered as a result of this proposal. Stacy Gallup, representing owners of the subject properties urged the Commission to be flexible, adding, in her opinion these two sites are regional medical; not residential. Peter Pustorino, 4005 West 65th Street told the Commission he has owned his building for 32 years and believes his property should be part of this proposed regional medical expansion. He pointed out a medical complex is a very logical expansion for this corner. Continuing, Pustorino said the City should view this as a very exciting opportunity. These two sites are older sites and the new proposal benefits the entire City of Edina. Concluding, Pustorino said it's time to move on. Page 8 of 15 Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Final comments /motion A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that the revised plans are superior to the plans previously presented and they can support the proposal as presented. Commissioners reiterated the following: • Acknowledge that this was the next step logical in redevelopment of this corner. • Acknowledge the importance of this corner; it needs a good development. • Encourage more interfacing with France Avenue; open up the fagade more. • Building height at 6- stories can be supported. • Reiterate the importance of store front doors; work on this between now and final approvals. • Proponents of a skyway system. Encourage building to be able to support skyways internally and across West 65th Street. • Consider placing planters on the tops of the ramps • Ensure that all landscaping and planting indicated are planted, retained and maintained. • Ensure lighting throughout the site is sensitive to the residential neighbors in the area. • Reconsider fee based parking; however, acknowledge it occurs in the area. • Support alternative transportation methods - can see a time when bikes would be seen on France Avenue. • Be mindful of signage • Full support of podium height Chair Grabiel suggested that any recommended approval should be done in two parts; first, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and second, preliminary rezoning and development plan approval. Motion Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment consistent with the findings and conditions noted in the staff report. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend preliminary rezoning to PUD and preliminary development plan approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions excluding condition 1. A. found on page 13 of the staff report. Staunton also noted that all efforts must be made to enhance France Avenue for pedestrians Page 9 of 15 with access into the building. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Lot Division request for Margaret Schultz, 100 Ridge Road and 5101 Green is Road. \7 Planner entation y i Planner Teagu a lained that Margaret Sc lz is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides her p o erties at 5100 Ridge; ad and 5101 Green Farms Road. There is no new lot bb' created with th I request, it is simply a shift in the rear lot line for each of these lots to pro i e a larger ba yard for the home at 5101 Green Farms Road. Planner Teague concluded t a staff t- commends that the City Council approves the Lot Division of 5100 Ridge Road an' SA4 Green Farms Road as requested on the, proposed lot division date stamped June 5, ZO��.` Approval is subject to the following condition: 1. All building activity on eitl }et�ot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. / Discussion /Comments Commissioner Forrest commented that this lot line rearrangement could in the future skew the neighborhood median; especially for lot de th. Chair Grabiel said his concern is with the odd lot line earrangement, adding in his opinion the larger lot should accept the unusual "L" rearrangement; not the smaller lot: Grabiel said that would \make more sense to him. Planner Teague explained that both lots are owned b t\ ame p erson and this is the � lot line rearrangerm�nt they submitted. Teague noted both lots continue to meet Code. Motion � Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend lot division appr val based on staff conditions. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All vote aye; motion carried. A� B. Sketch Pan Review - BKV Group - 5109 and 5117 West 49th Street. Veknon Avenue/Senior Housing 7 Page 10 of 15 MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA 6500 France Avenue South PROJECT SUMMARY July 5, 2012 Our development team is looking forward to working with the City of Edina to obtain the necessary approvals for the Edina Medical Plaza. Everyone Will strive to make this building an outstanding addition to this regional medical area. Development Team a These professionals are local business owners that live in the community. Architect: Edward Farr Architects Long established firm that is strong on design concept Past projects include No;rnardale Lakes Office and Two Twelve Medical Center Civil Engineering: Alliant Engineering, Mark Rausch Developer: Mount Development Co.; Stephen. Michals Five medical buildings have been completed in the past 6 years for Ridgeview Medical Center. Owner: Aurora Investments, LLC, Luigi Bernardi Current medical building ownership; All "class A" buildings 7373 France Avenue, Edina 212 Medical Center; Chaska Multiple Buildings it! Wisconsin Please contact Stephen Michals with any questions on this new building. NINISOWLb-, 10400 Viking Dri; e, Suite 160; Eden Prairie:, Minnesota .5.5.344 9.52 -94t -1.383 f-i.x 952 - 941 -1.560 Phase 1 View from Northeast Corner EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC °�G� 1Ejp) July 6, 2012 MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. i� Edina Medical Plaza all= 0 Maims Win m w i s 0 � son mW W Ms ON- WM� 00!90 W,A'9 - 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 81 ' Building measurements to the highest point Cornelia Place Apartments 4105 W. 65th Street 4 Stories - 79' (4 level building including gable roof) July 6, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA hO OP \ENf CO. DEVEL _- Edina Medical Plaza. p ��iii�' �ri��i■'� CDOO iiJIM;�. 000 = O m iii l: o � a n» 4W6 , 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 81' Building measurements to the highest point EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC Fairview Southdale Hospital n� .1 will gas M ■w w P � ���� . i� , ■ 11 ■ of 0 t i c ■ ■m . ■solos$ 6401 - 6405 France Avenue South 4 & 8 Stories - 124' EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA f��6�U July 6, 2012 MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. Edina Medical Plaza 020= 05 MNiN W i ails _ wwias� was pv 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 81' Building measurements to the highest point Point of France 6566 France Avenue South 13 Stories -123' July 6, 2012 EDWARD FARR DI MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. III= I ■ Edina Medical Plaza. iiiiii iii oul, Bann all iWiiimi- ails 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 81' Building measurements to the highest point EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC 0 4 Southdale Medical Center 6545 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 92' EDII`IA MEDICAL PLAZA scmwEg 1 -7 - fi-I 1. July 6, 2012 MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. Edina Medical Plaza .' 0000 ©00�, ■ai��`r: boo ®'� RUN _M v i m o A Nis �Orr,, = 1 6:00 / r� 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 81 ' Building measurements to the highest point Southdale Office Centre 6600 & 6800 France Avenue South 6 & 7 Stories - 99' NEr6 �� July 6, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC MOUNT DEVELOPMEN "t CO. Edina Medical Plaza. ®oa����`� ■_ wa NoWn SWI ails .m Alm o � was 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 81' Building measurements to the highest point EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC 2 s. p Twin City Orthopedics 4010 West 65th Street 4 Stories - 82'& 85' EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA July 6, 2012 MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. PROCLAMATION JOHN SCHAEFER DAY JULY 26, 2012 .WHEREAS, John Schaefer has given his time, talents and energies to the Edina community for the past 27 years; and WHEREAS, John Schaefer, a native of Edina, began his medical career as an orderly in the Emergency Room at Fairview Southdale Hospital, and then decided to become an emergency physician; and WHEREAS, John Schaefer graduated from the University of Minnesota School of Medicine and completed his residency and internship at. Northwestern Hospital in Chicago, Illinois; and WHEREAS, John_ Schaefer was a witty and humorous physician who always put the patient first and had a wonderful bedside manner making his patient feel at ease despite difficult circumstances, providing outstanding care to more than 100,000 patients; and WHEREAS, John Schaefer was an inspirational leader who made the Fairview Southdale Emergency Department one of the best in the region; and WHEREAS, John Schaefer served for three years as the Fairview Southdale Chief:of Staff and six years as its Medical Director; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim, July 26, 2012 as " John Schaefer Day to honor John's long public service to our community. Dated this 26th day of July, 2012 James B. Hovland, Mayor a e W .,� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 27, 2012 VLA Community Development Director INFORIIAATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Mount Properties is proposing to tear down the existing office buildings at 4005 West 65th Street and 6500 France Avenue to build a new six -story, 81 -foot tall, 102;406 square foot medical office /retail building with a detached 5 -level parking ramp. The project is proposed to be developed in two phases. The first phase would °be the construction of a 4 -story, 69,456 square foot medical office with a 3- level detached parking ramp. The second phase would add two levels to each structure. The first floor of the new building, would contain 7,000 square feet of retail space including a coffee shop, barber shop and medical supplies. The next four levels would contain 62,310 square feet of medical office. (See property location on pages At - -A4; and the applicant's narrative, building rendering and plans on pages A19 —A68.) In order to obtain the above- mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two -step process. The first step in the process is to obtain the following approvals: 1. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow a building height of 6 stories and 81 feet on this site. The Comprehensive Plan requires a maximum height of 4'stories or 48 feet; (This requires a four - fifths vote of the City Council for approval.) 2. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and 3. Preliminary Development Plan. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan are approved by the City Council, the following is required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to PUD. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. The Planning Commission considered and recommended denial of a proposal for just the 6500 France site to construct a 5 -story building on the site. (See Planning Commission minutes on pages A98— A107.) The applicant elected not to go before the City Council for review, after the denial; rather, they attempted to address the comments made by the Planning Commission, including acquiring the property to the west to include within the development, revised their plans, and are now back again before the Planning Commission for review of a PUD. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Fairview Hospital parking ramp; zoned APD, Automobile Parking District Easterly: Fairview Hospital; zoned and guided Regional Medical District. Southerly: Point of France condos; Zoned PRD-4, Planned Residential District & High Density Residential Westerly: Cornelia Place Apartments; zoned PRD-4, High Density Residential; and guided High Density Residential Existing Site Features The subject property is 2.34 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains two office buildings. (See pages A2 —A3 and A15 —A16.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Regional Medical. (See page A5 —A6.) Zoning: POD -1, Planned Office District. (See page A4.) Comprehensive Guide Plan This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A7.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." 2 Since the City Council did not consider the) Sketch Plan, they were unable to determine if a Small Area Plan was necessary. The decision to require a Small Area Plan shall be made by the City Council: The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Regional Medical,- RM." (See pages A5 —A6.) Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan designation. The Comprehensive Plan :requires a maximum height of four (4) stories and 48 feet tall, with a podium height of two (2) stories.. (See" age A14.) The. applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow a six (6) story 81 " -foot tall building on the site. Rezoning to PUD The applicant is requesting a rezoning of this site from Planned Office District -1, (POD -1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Planned Office District allows for medical office buildings up to a floor area ratio of .5. (50 %) Undercurrent. zoning a 51,482 square foot office building would be permitted. The proposed 102,406 square foot building would have a floor area ratio of .995.. The site is currently guided for Regional Medical use; therefore, the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Regional Medical Zoning District allows a floor area ratio of 1.0. (100 %) Within a PUD District, the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent of the PUD. (See pages. 5-7. below.) The table on the following page demonstrates a comparison of the base zoning compared to the proposed. 3 Compliance Table * Would require variance if no PUD As a comparison the following variances were required for Twin City Orthopedic: 1. Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) 2. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 3. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 4. Front parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 18 feet. (A 49 -foot variance.) 5. Rear parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 20 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 6. Side parking structure setback variance from 57 feet to 10 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 7. A side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3 feet. (A 6.7 -foot variance.) 8. Minimum tract area variance from 10 acres to 2 acres. (An 8 acre variance.) 9. A parking stall variance from 393 stalls to 373 stalls. (A 20 -stall variance.) (The FAR for Twin City Orthopedic was .85 or 85 %) 4 City Standard Proposed (POD -1) Building Setbacks Front — France Ave 81 feet 25 feet* Front — North 81 feet 25 feet* Side — West 81 feet 100+ feet Rear — South 81 feet 30 feet* Parking Structure Setbacks Front - France Ave. 44 feet 100+ feet Front — North 42 feet 25 feet* Side — West 52 feet 20 feet* Rear — South 46 feet 20 feet* Building Height Four Stories or 48 Six Stories & feet whichever is less 80.5 feet* Building Coverage 30% 42 %* Maximum Floor Area Ratio .5 or 50% .995 or 99.5 %* (FAR) Lot size = 56,192 s.f. Gross s.f. = 102,406 (1.0 or 100% allowed s.f. in the Regional Medical District) Landscaping 34 over story trees and a full 62 overstory trees & 250+ complement of under story understory trees and shrubs shrubs. would be planted. Parking Stalls 548 — Based on 553 95,460 s.f. medical 311 *stalls (27 doctors) and 6,946 s.f. general retail 374 Phase 1 Parking Stall Size 8.5'x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Would require variance if no PUD As a comparison the following variances were required for Twin City Orthopedic: 1. Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) 2. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 3. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 4. Front parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 18 feet. (A 49 -foot variance.) 5. Rear parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 20 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 6. Side parking structure setback variance from 57 feet to 10 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 7. A side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3 feet. (A 6.7 -foot variance.) 8. Minimum tract area variance from 10 acres to 2 acres. (An 8 acre variance.) 9. A parking stall variance from 393 stalls to 373 stalls. (A 20 -stall variance.) (The FAR for Twin City Orthopedic was .85 or 85 %) 4 (The FAR for the Fairview Hospital Campus is 1.16116 %) Rezoning to PUD Per Section 850.04. Subd. 4 D provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The applicant is proposing a development that would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan guides this site as Regional Medical; therefore, the proposed medical office with complementary retail uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The building would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. Parking would be located in back. Landscaping and patios are also proposed in front, with store fronts opening toward France Avenue. The applicant is also proposing to utilize sustainable design principals. Green building practices are suggested, and small green roofs are proposed. (See pages A20 A27, of the applicant's narrative that explains how this project meets the above purpose and intent of the PUD Ordinance.) 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1, R -2 and PRD- 1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. This site would be envisioned to allow uses permitted within the Regional Medical District, as this site is guided Regional Medical in the Comprehensive Plan. The Zoning Ordinance amendment on pages A108— A109 lists the uses that would be allowed on this site. WSB and Associates did a parking analysis that determined that the proposed parking would support the uses proposed. (See pages A69 —A96.) b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; 0 The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Regional Medical," which allows medical offices as a permitted use. The,current site is zoned POD -1, and guided for Regional Medical. Within the, Regional Medical District, 10 % of an office building may contain retail uses allowed in the PCD =1 and PCD -2' Zoning District; as long as the primary function of the uses'is to serve the office users: The proposed uses would be consistent with that standard. (See pages Al 10 —A115 fora list ofuses allowed within the PCD -1 and PCD -2 Districts.) A any PUD which involves a:single land, use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the�objecbves of. this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned above, the proposed uses would be medical office and limited retail, consistent with Comprehensive Plan. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated'in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and The proposed building density would have an FAR of .995 or 99.5 %. The Floor Area Ratio contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance is 1.0 or 100 %. As a comparison, the TCO building has an FAR of 8.5 or 85 %, and the Fairview Hospital campus has an FAR of 1.16 or 116 %. iv, the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be. considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from' to accomplish the purpose and intent 'described'in V above. The proposed project does, not closely relate to the conventional zoning district. Ten (10) variances would be' required and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment necessary to accommodate the proposal. However, the request is similar to the request made by Twin City'Orthopedic, -and FAR. now complies with the contemplated land use designation of Regional Medical in the Comprehensive Plan. Site Access The primary access to the site would remain off of 65t" Street West. There would. be a right -out only onto France. (See page A29.) 6 Parking & Traffic Per Section 850.08 Subd. 1, the following are the parking requirements: One space per 200 square feet for medical office and 1 space per doctor. The retail requirement is 8 spaces for the first 1,000 square feet and six spaces for each additional 1,000 square feet. The medical office would be 95,460 square feet, after Phase 2 construction, and would have 27 doctors (1 doctor for each 3,500 square feet of medical office.); the retail space would be 6,946 square feet. Based on the above, 548 parking stalls are required. The applicant is proposing 553 spaces. A parking study was done by WSB which concludes that the proposed parking would support the uses. (See pages A76 —A77.) Phase 1 would consist of 62,456 square feet of medical office and 7,000 s.f. of retail, 312 spaces are required for the medical office and 44 spaces required for the retail. Therefore, 374 stalls are required. The proposed plans indicate that 311 stalls would be provided in the parking ramp. The WSB parking study concludes that the Phase 1 parking needs are 288 stalls. (See page A76, of the parking study.) With the addition of Phase 2, the addition to the parking ramp would then meet the City's parking standards. (See page A76 —A77 of the parking study. A traffic study was also done by WSB, which concludes that the existing roadways support the proposed uses. (See traffic study on pages A69 —A96.) However, as was conditioned in the approvals for Twin City Orthopedic, should signal improvements be deemed necessary at 65th Street and France Avenue, the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements. This would be a requirement in the Developer's Agreement. During the Sketch Plan review the Planning Commission requested information regarding bus routes and bus stops in the area. The applicant has submitted that information. (See page A50.) Bus Route #6 and #684 go down 65th Street with the closest stop at Fairview Hospital. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 34 overstory trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs are required. The applicant is proposing to plant 62 overstory trees around the perimeter of the site & 250+ understory trees and shrubs. (See landscape plan on page A58.) Final landscape.plans shall be reviewed more closely during the review of the Final Development Plan. 8 Grading & Utilities The,city engineer has reviewed the plans and found them generally acceptable .and offered comments. (See page A97.) A fire hydrant should be placed mid - property along West 65th Street and also one along France Avenue. Final locations would be determined by the city engineer and fire marshal. The city engineer further recommends a treatment structure for the storm sewer system P rior to draining to the infiltration basin due to the area located in a medium vulnerability area ,for the Drinking Water Surface Management Area. A more detailed review would-be done as part of the Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. Noise Study During the Sketch Plan review, the Planning Commission requested information regarding noise. A noise study was done by Kvernstoen, Ronnholm and Associates, which concludes that the noise generated'by the rooftop mechanical equipment will not add to the noise levels currently on the site. (See pages A116— A117.) The rooftop equipment, once constructed would be required to meet all state requirements for noise. Signage Signage would be allowed per the requirements of the Regional Medical District within the Zoning Ordinance Amendment for the PUD. (See draft on pages A108- A109.) PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow greater height reasonable for this site, ? Yes. Staff believes the proposed height increase is reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed height is consistent with adjacent buildings` to the south and east. To the south; the Point of France building is 13 stories and 123 feet tall. To the east, Fairview Southdale Hospital is 8 stories and 124 feet tall, and Southdale Medical Center is 6 stories and 92 feet tall. Therefore, the proposed 6 -story, 81 foot tall building would be in character with the adjacent buildings. 0 2. The building includes a podium height of one -story along the street, which would give pedestrians on the sidewalks in front a feeling that the building is not as tall. (See page A44.) Comprehensive Plan Contemplates allowing a maximum of four (4) stories with a podium height of two stories at the street. (See graphic on page A14.) 3. The proposed plan would meet the density requirement of a 1.0 floor area ratio. • Is the proposed rezoning to PUD appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal to rezone the site to PUD is reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Regional Medical," which allows medical uses, and limited retail. Through the PUD rezoning, the City has the ability to specifically limit the uses on the site to be consistent with limited retail uses per the PCD -1 Zoning District to ensure that the uses can be supported by the parking provided. 2. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The building would be pulled up close to the street with a podium height of one -story, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. Parking would be located in back. Landscaping and patios are also proposed in front, with store fronts opening toward France Avenue. The applicant is also proposing to utilize sustainable design principals, including a green roof. (See pages A23 —A27, of the applicant's narrative that explains how this project meets the above purpose and intent of the PUD Ordinance.) 3. A floor area ratio of 1.0 or 100% would be consistent with the buildings and floor area ratios on the west side of France on 65th Street. 4. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that the traffic generated from the project would not impact the adjacent driveways or intersections. No additional improvements other than those shown on the site plan would be required to accommodate the site redevelopment. (See traffic study on pages A69 —A96.) 5. Ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: 10 a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front fagade. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow a 6 -story, 81 -foot tall building on the site. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed height is consistent with adjacent buildings to the south and east. To the south, the Point of France building is 13 stories and 123 feet tall. To the east, Fairview Southdale Hospital is 8 stories and 124 feet tall, and Southdale Medical Center is 6 stories and 92 feet tall. 11 2. The building includes a podium height of one -story along the street, which would give pedestrians on the sidewalk in front, a feeling that the building is not as tall. 3. The proposed plan would meet the density requirement of a 1.0 floor area ratio. Preliminary Rezoning to Planned Unit Development Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD - 1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned unit development. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street. 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, glass and concrete. A four story building would be generally consistent with the four story buildings on West 65t' Street. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. 5. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front fagade. 12 ® Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Preliminary approval is subject to the following conditions: The Final Development Plan must be generPh consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated May and June 18, with the following revisions: a. The parking ramp must be finished on all elevations to match the cornice, on the medical building and the stair and elevator tower on the parking ramp. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A23 —A27 of the staff report. -3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated June 19, 2012. (Page A97.) 5. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65" Street and France Avenue. 6. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. Deadline for a city decision: September 18, 2012 13 fasif►af iBr1 ►e� R-1-d Part 4M x M City of Edina 21 6 2- SJ'N t 6t0a fifi N Q76 aaclu •Park "11- A �A Y r ilff. Mir bNlO f � N MJ► IRSJ�� -s M W2 Mfg, { 73M PID:3002824140008 6500 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 �'A 7M M/ Y • V V.• Legend Highlighted Feature Heuse Number Labels Street Name Labels N City Limits Cmeks Lake Names LI Lk.. ❑ Parks ❑ Parcels City of Edina 6332 . f3j.7 Legend 6J26 4731 House Number LAWS 1%6 p Street Name Label% 7 City Limits frirMC� A 1-,W� Y42 Creeks 'AUM"Y" p El Lake Names -:j LAtts El Perk. • A pe, I Parcels 2111111Aerial Photo kJ I'l W-4 V, I= WMIN MM 0. Alk CIS .1 ji WAA dl- A. A 714 3-1 PID:3002824140008 6500 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 A?, P'1�65tl or—An V�' Hwy-62 in, I I s Orth p—edic- W6S -st 4 Vk, A&L 7 w W 66thSt- .1*6 cz vT wr W, 14_". rK OF gob rD Fairview So6th'dal ctl ----------- -4 Z", Southdale Medical nter :-Z' =- IN, miff I It IFS. .,. k r •"Q29 J22H 6166 am am 6363 '�', 6701 6300 al0f a]M a70f H- '� en: clef 7215 7121 6780 6,703 6�i � 6769 6100 670! 6706 alas 6704 7721 7120 6707 6306 6707 67rJ 6301 6700 am (S; 6707 67 ] s ' 6717 4117 7176 ii6a 6H1 12 S 6717 6]17 6313 63/2 any 7217 6717 6216 � 6321 6716 all _its 7209 73� 6116 677! sum 6119 6]14 6321 a7>r f f a!:) 1p0 i ;107 6310 677! 6376 o3M �- 637! 6326 r ! 7200 6716 6717 633 6733 I �r u f i }i6i•pyE4 1. -- .&-L♦� t1. L/"'. / 6-43 !V 13 f.TiJ ��//0 CJJi 1 1 7J City of Edina I q : 1 7160 d ?2t 1130 622H 62M 8219 a?!S 6120 6711 6120 6223 6127 8111 6210 -- - 62fZ�i1H 8?r, .1 6115 6224 621f IfLO BYIr to 6110 : f_' *.. ' _ •• 62]2 Q37 6224 r __` __.._ 6119 8118 a22e it3t 6123 a7D1 PLrks •"Q29 J22H 6166 am am 6363 '�', 6701 6300 al0f a]M a70f H- '� en: clef 7215 7121 6780 6,703 6�i � 6769 6100 670! 6706 alas 6704 7721 7120 6707 6306 6707 67rJ 6301 6700 am (S; 6707 67 ] s ' 6717 4117 7176 ii6a 6H1 12 S 6717 6]17 6313 63/2 any 7217 6717 6216 � 6321 6716 all _its 7209 73� 6116 677! sum 6119 6]14 6321 a7>r f f a!:) 1p0 i ;107 6310 677! 6376 o3M �- 637! 6326 r ! 7200 6716 6717 633 6733 I �r u f i }i6i•pyE4 1. -- .&-L♦� t1. L/"'. / 6-43 !V 13 f.TiJ ��//0 CJJi 1 1 7J I J Clb Llmlh f/ Cranks Lake Names I� Lakes PLrks 1615 ® s £ , ? ■ 24 6315 3JN i \�6cJ3 ■ 7Ca -21Pb wf Ce�rmocaOW.it1 ■ PCO -0jPbwaCc.T.rac- >t0 +a.� -11 ■ PCD= IP>n..l Ca.r�cA Gvl.dl El P.ni>'�wJ1.a..vaaarcl OP'Jn l/Pae.." 0"' ❑ P002(Pb.wH ar�O:sfran7 ■ saw" ■ IT1n- 2tPla+ef Rsic.ld D.slral ■ 'MI S M ■ PP041pb -s kzi- -D— 1 ■ _ 1 PSA41Ptawl6..irO —j R -111 abOrC:..711.51 . aS71 O RA1Dj"..a1%Ud"Da ". Parcels 6177 200311sria1 Phats _w 61461"'sM. wst —r =—auaa N7* I PID:3002824140008 6500 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 A-� `ya V `-� Legand House Number Labels Mprot Name Labels J Clb Llmlh f/ Cranks Lake Names I� Lakes PLrks 7bninp ® APa,►.1. r.ae�Palb78�rictl 11a0eM1..J Dn ^bP.ra1 DYJ�71 ■ N60SfA11eJ0. ^:a1�>•1 Uabcll ■ aleaaMl�lo...blu.�n.+rrn me ■ 7Ca -21Pb wf Ce�rmocaOW.it1 ■ PCO -0jPbwaCc.T.rac- >t0 +a.� -11 ■ PCD= IP>n..l Ca.r�cA Gvl.dl El P.ni>'�wJ1.a..vaaarcl OP'Jn l/Pae.." 0"' ❑ P002(Pb.wH ar�O:sfran7 ■ PRO.1 t7'b..et re�J.nm oc.�ai ■ IT1n- 2tPla+ef Rsic.ld D.slral ■ PRaa:Ph. wl Rci7..tLUmn ^.1 ■ PP041pb -s kzi- -D— 1 ■ PRO IPh..xf Re- -. 0 :—, ■ PSA41Ptawl6..irO —j R -111 abOrC:..711.51 ■ 4210 ... b&If, .70.71 O RA1Dj"..a1%Ud"Da ". Parcels 200311sria1 Phats for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan.) Rgure 4.3 City of Edina Future Land Use Plan 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS �J—LI 1 e 0 0.5 Miles S,4 r Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -25 ....for living, learning, raising families & doing business ��� 2908 Comprehensive Plan Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Mixed Use Guidelines Guidelines Categories RM Hospitals, medical and dental Form -based design Regional Medical offices and clinics, and standards for building Floor to Area laboratories for performing placement, massing Ratio - Per medical or dental research, and street -level current diagnostic testing, analytical or treatment. Zoning Code: clinical work, having a direct Pedestrian circulation maximum of relationship to the providing of and open space 1.0 health services. General office amenities should be uses are permitted. provided for larger sites. OSP Applies to major parks and Performance and N/A Open Space and protected open space that is buffering standards Parks publicly owned. May not include for intensive outdoor all small parks, since some are recreation, parking. included in residential land use districts. PSP Applies to schools, large Performance and To be Public /Semi- Public institutional uses (churches, buffering standards determined - cemeteries) and semi - public uses for intensive outdoor may require such as country clubs. Some recreation, parking. review of small uses of these types may be large -scale integrated into other land use development districts. or institutional expansion LAH Expressways and access ramps NA NA Limited Access for two regional arterial Highway highways (TH 62 and TH 100) occupy land within the City to serve local and regional travel needs. *Floor -to -area ratio, or FAR, refers to the ratio of a building's floor area to the size of its lot. Thus, an FAR of 1.0 could mean a two -story building covering 50% of the lot; a 3 -story building on one -third of the lot, etc. Potential Areas of Change Among its many purposes, the Comprehensive Plan functions as a long range tool that attempts to anticipate where change and growth will occur in the City. Identifying those potential areas of change is an initial stage in the process of guiding new construction and redevelopment when it is proposed by private property owners. It is not an attempt to stimulate change, but to acknowledge that it may occur and be proactive in shaping it. Locations identified in this section appear to be areas where change may occur during the life of this Plan. Many of these areas were identified in a group exercise at Public Meeting #2 as Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 tltl Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design /T W 4 -30 J f ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business, i /'f/ 2008 Comprehensive Plan a City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Date of Aerial Photography' August 2006 Figure 4.4 Conceptual Lend Use Framework: Potential Areas of Change e � 0 5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -33 it ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan between offices and residential buildings. Edinborough is linked with the Centennial Lakes project by a network of pedestrian greenways. The following guidelines are directed toward creating successful mixed use environments. (Also see the, citywide standards for movement patterns, public spaces and built form earlier in this section.) Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. ■ Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. ■ Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front fagade. Movement Patterns. 110 ., • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. • Encourage enhanced transit stops, including shelters, shade and seating where feasible. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc). Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -47 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business �jfr �� 2008 Comprehensive Plan 3. Improve Connectivity in Large -scale Superblock Development. Internal and external connectivity. As part of redevelopment or expansion of large -scale sites, reintroduce an internal local street and pathway network that connects through the site and to suitable entry points at the perimeter. The goal is to encourage pedestrians to reach the site and drivers upon arriving to continue all further movement by foot. As a result, the capacity of internal roads can be reduced and more area devoted to amenities, providing still more incentives to walk. Bicycle facilities should allow residents in surrounding neighborhoods to bike safely to the site. Transit stops should be provided in visible and central locations. "Edge" or transitional uses. Moderately sized encouraged to soften the edge of large -scale superblock development. Medium - density housing types such as townhouses combined with structured parking may also be an appropriate transitional use. 4. Provide appropriate transitions between land uses. Rather than discouraging movement between adjacent land uses with liner buildings should be berms and fences, focus on creating elegant and attractive transitions between adjacent uses. Transitional areas include well - landscaped pedestrian walkways, seating areas, arcades, and other spaces that encourage public use, rather than separation. 5. Buildings Frame the Street. Building placement and heights can serve to define the streetscape and visually reduce the apparent width of the street. Generally speaking, wider streets can accommodate taller buildings subject to the height limitations described elsewhere in this Chapter. 6. Facade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well- defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks or similar techniques. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design j pi 4 -48 tom• M O ...for- living, learning, raising families & doing business `i�3 2008 Comprehensive Plan 7. Transparency and Natural Surveillance. Building forms and facades should provide an awareness of the activity within the buildings through frequent doors and windows oriented toward public streets and open space. 8. Variety of Building Forms. Encourage an integrated mix of building types, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. 9. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks and public spaces. 10. Building Heights. The question of building height is particularly significant in a largely developed community, where any new building has the potential to block views or cast shadows on established neighborhoods and land uses. The design guidelines above, as well as the recommended building heights in Figures 4.6A, 4.6B, and 4.6C, provide general guidance for buildings that exceed the typical residential height of 2.5 stories: Edina already has many tall buildings, but not all of them provide the kind of transition outlined in Principle 9 above. Building height should be considered within the larger urban design context as illustrated in the photos below. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -49 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business W 2008 Comprehensive Plan) r f -qmFzlr- MEN .0 -.-I; tM' Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 411 4-50 (...for living, learning, raising families & doing business ��� `si= 2008 Comprehensive Plan Because of the limited number of locations where tall buildings can be sited, and the need for sensitivity to surrounding uses, the following Height Maps have been established for those parts of the city with potential for higher density development. The maps were developed to specify the following height measurements: Podium Height: The "podium" is that part of the building that abuts the street, or that provides the required transition to residential neighborhoods, parks, and other sensitive uses. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design, 4 -51 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan.J Standard Height: This height measurement extends to the top of the building (building height is measured as specified in the Zoning Ordinance). R MwM -Vr-wr- MEN FrIll `Podium height" building examples Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4-52 0 E W a` N M Z n `o V 7 c d City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights M. 41t Southeast Quadrant Figure #.68 0.5 Miles GSb 0 Trot m e t CIS_ � eat .�^ w t.. - �Vyikt yUyc�yi+o*�� =, -�-, .. ,� f ffi !'!�'i�.S� �. t f r l ��. r...� „..�...,, . , i _, .t .. a :r�•..,,.,� _ _ ��� __ ��. - ..� •” - ,,,.. -� . - � "" �, '°'" _ _ - -' �' � rte°'" =�" � � - .."'!r 1 �,,,_., _ �! ... l'a <� I ol, l .-A" h�� AtILICAAJI MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA 6500 France Avenue South PROJECT SUMMARY May 25, 2012 NA At ATIVE Our development team is looking forward to working with the City of Edina to obtain the necessary approvals for the Edina Medical Plaza. Everyone will strive to make this building an outstanding addition to this regional medical area. Development Team These professionals are local business owners that live in the community. Architect: Edward Farr Architects Long established firm that is strong on design concept Past projects include Normandale Lakes Office and Two Twelve Medical Center Civil Engineering: Alliant Engineering, Mark Rausch General Contractor: RJM Construction, Rodney Hintz Recently completed the Twin Cities Orthopedic Building Developer: Mount Development Co., Stephen Michals Five medical buildings have been completed in the past 6 years for Ridgeview Medical Center. Owner: Aurora Investments, LLC, Luigi Bernardi Current medical building ownership; All "class A" buildings 7373 France Avenue, Edina 212 Medical Center, Chaska Multiple Buildings in Wisconsin Please contact Stephen Michals with any questions on this new building. 10400 Viking Drive, Suite 160, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 952 - 941 -138:3 Fax 952 -941 -1560 I W Overview: Our revised submittal has been substantially improved by including the 4005 65th St W. property in addition to our earlier redevelopment proposal of 6500 France Av South, thereby offering a comprehensive, planned redevelopment plan for both remaining under - utilized parcels in the SW qua drant.of France Av and 65t St..W. Our proposal is a Phased redevelopment. Phase 1 consists of removing both old buildings on the properties, then constructing a new four, story, 69,456 gross sq ft / 65,500 rentable sq ft medical office- building and a-detached 3 level parking ramp-for 311 cars. Phase 2 would add another two stories to the medical office-building (adding 32,950 gross sq ft / 31,000 rentable sq ft) for a total of six,stories; 102,406 gross sq ft / 96,500 rentable sq ft. The parking ramp is also - expandable up another two levels (adding 242 cars) for a total of 5 levels / 553 cars. Note that our revised proposal _is slightly below the suggested F.A.R. maximum of 1.0 identified for this Regional Medical District. Planning Concept: Joining these two parcels offer many advantages to the site layout. We are still adopting an urban, pedestrian - friendly, .streetscape along France Ave by bringing the building forward to the street; but now we are also incorporating; a 'podium' design effect by setting the building back above 2"d floor to maintain a comfortably - scaled pedestrian experience. The streetscape also includes: saving the many large over -story trees along the right -of -way, a 10 ft wide sidewalk and decorative planters that contain colorful plantings (annuals, perennials and low evergreen shrubs). Vehicular ingress is now available at two driveways along 65th St W.; and vehicular egress is available at three points from the site, dispersing the traffic more effectively. Internal vehicular circulation has been improved by adding a visitor entry drop -off circle at the front door, as well as a dedicated delivery area for the building. Further, we have improved our setback dimensions around the parking ramp, offering more perimeter green space. Building Design: The building design will be an attractive facade using multiple colors of face brick, warm -toned architectural precast concrete wall panels with a variety of surface finishes, reflective bronze -tone Low -e glass in champagne painted aluminum frames and a small amount of EIFS decorative cornice trim. The main entrance has now been 'moved west to a more convenient visitor drop. -off area for patients, set back but facing 65tH St W.,'featuring a distinctive' glazed crown with backlighting at night. The building will eventually grow,W6.stories taller in Phase: so we're presenting both the Phase 1 and the Phase 2 building designs for your review and approval. The building corner at France Ave and 65th St W.is still an important point of identity for the,building, and will incorporate a plaza area that will offer seating for any potential retail tenant, and also coordinates with the City's initiative to upgrade the'pedestrian experience at these corners. The plaza'will have decorative surfacing treatment and protective bollards behind the curb to protect pedestrians. Visual Screening for the Adjacent Properties: We will supplement the already mature landscape buffer between Point of France and our site with new coniferous trees and over -story trees along .our south yard. The ash trees along this borderline with Point of France are approx. 35'— 50' tall, providing excellent screening A .16 for most months of the year. On the west, we are retaining all of existing evergreen trees that buffer that west yard currently, as well as planning more evergreens and deciduous trees there. The existing outdoor trash dumpsters will be placed indoors. Most of the perimeter trees along our property will be saved during construction, and in addition, new perimeter plantings will add to the screening. Parking: The ramp has been designed to complement the office facade with a compatible multi - colored architectural precast concrete facade. We are proposing to build 3 levels / 311 cars in Phase 1, which we feel will serve the building based on our current operating experience. Level -1 is below grade, Level +1 is on grade, and Level 2 is one level above grade. In Phase 2 we would likely build one more ramp level (Level 3) / 121 more cars; however, we have designed the ramp to be expanded two additional levels (Levels 3 & 4) to meet proof of parking, with a total possible parking count of 553. This will be a Pay -Park facility, similar to the Fairview Southdale Hospital ramp. Up to 10% of the parking may be compact car size; but we have not yet shown striping for these smaller stalls on our plan. Lastly, it is possible that a skyway pedestrian bridge might be built between the parking ramp and office building sometime in the future; this skyway would likely be located between Level 3 of the ramp and Floor 3 of the office building; but has not yet been designed. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain: The existing properties located at 4005 65th St. W. and 6500 France Ave So. are currently encumbered by two public utilities; an existing 12" ductile iron water main and 12" ductile iron sanitary sewer in the south quarter of the property. The existing water main and sanitary sewer referenced serve other properties and thus the continuity of those mains is required. A second 8" sanitary sewer line is located within the boundary of both properties but that line is in use only by the two existing buildings and thus does not need to remain if the proposed project is constructed. The existing 12" sanitary sewer along the southern property line of the 6500 France Ave property will remain as is. The proposed development does not require any modification to that line. The proposed plan is to construct a new sanitary service Wye in the existing line to provide an 8" service to the new building. The existing 8" sanitary service line to the 4005 building will be `cut off at the west side of the proposed parking ramp and will then be connected to the parking ramp for servicing the floor drains in the lower level of the ramp. The existing 12" watermain loop cutting through the site will be relocated and re- routed to the north side of the properties. A new 12" main will be installed northerly along France Ave., then westerly just to the north of the proposed building and ramp to the western edge of the property, then southerly back to the existing watermain completed the new loop. It is currently proposed to directional bore install the northerly and southerly aligned watermain to avoid removal of the existing trees in those locations. The east to west watermain will be installed via direct bu%as its proposed location can be installed without removal of the existing trees along 65 Ave. An 8" water service is proposed from a tee off the re- routed 12" watermain just north of the proposed building Aar entrance. The proposed building service will enter the building in the corner west of the main building entrance. A new hydrant is proposed in the central entrance area of the new building off the proposed 8" service line. Stormwater Management: The proposed stormwater management storage facilities proposed for the Edina Medial Plaza project meets the requirements of Nine Mile Creek Watershed and the City of Edina. The three primary requirements that have been met are: 1. Volume retention onsite equivalent to 1" of runoff over the entire proposed site impervious surface. (Accomplished via underground storage and filtration via perforated piping and rock bedding). 2. Water quality volume from entire site equivalent to runoff from 2" type II storm event and 25 year sediment storage. (Retention volume counts towards WQ volume and remainder accomplished via additional underground storage and filtration via perforated piping and rock bedding). 3. Discharge rate control shall be provided so the proposed conditions do not exceed existing conditions for the 2, 10, and 100 yr storm events. The proposed site plan reduces by 4.7% the amount of impervious surface and thus proposed discharge rates are decreased automatically. The proposed plan is to maintain the same point of stormwater discharge from the properties as is currently present. A private storm sewer collection system will be routed from north to south through the central portion of the site collecting the majority of site runoff. The storm sewer will drain to the proposed underground storage system at the southern end of the site which will ultimately overflow to the existing flared end that will then continue to drain southerly to the Point of France pond. Landscape Design Strategies: The landscape design provides a mix of over - story, coniferous and ornamental trees, shrubs and perennials to create a vibrant display of color and foliage. Four existing Honeylocust trees are to be preserved along France Avenue and eight of the boulevard Ash trees along 65th Street are also to be saved. Raised curbed planters are to be provided along France Avenue that will be planted with colorful, annual flowers. The perimeter of the Medical Office Building will be planted with a mixture of plant types to soften and compliment the building architecture. The parking ramp will be screened by existing and proposed conifers on the west and south sides. The diversity of plantings will provide color variety and year round interest. In addition, the project_ is proposing to provide a green roof system on the second floor roofs on the north and east sides of the building for its environmental and aesthetic benefits. Site Lighting: Decorative wall mounted lighting along France Av and 65th St W. frontages, and around the main entry area; metal halide pole lights on top of the parking ramp with sharp cutoff features. A J,a Site Signage: Building name / address at corner of France & 65th St. W., and address above front entry. Possible tenant names on facade based on City code. Directional signs at both entries along 65thSt. W. Hours of Use: Normal Business Hours anticipated. Possible retail tenants at street level with extended and /or weekend hours. Zoning: Planned Office District 1 (POD -1), proposing to PUD, due to variances requested for building setbacks, building height and Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.). Green Building Practices: Throughout all phases of the project - Design, Construction and Operation, we will use best practices of environmental awareness. All clinics and vendors will be educated on Reduce - Recycle -Reuse operations. We have a Green Building Practices Narrative with our submission. New to our proposal is the inclusion of two green roof areas at podium level where our building facade steps back. Community Benefits from the New Project Our application is for new six level medical office building developed in two phases. The 6500 France building and 4005 W. 65th Street buildings will be removed. Both law firms will relocate in the community and retain the current jobs. 2. This site provides outstanding visibility for medical clinics offering service to our community and support to the regional medical presence of the SW suburbs. This is consistent with the City Guide Plan of medical buildings along France Avenue which is an address easily recognized for patients. 3. The building is sized to have a critical mass of providers to allow cross referrals among the clinics. This is a key factor for the success of each clinic. 4. Edward Farr Architects are known for creating special building design features. This building is more than a traditional medical building. The focal point will be the glass and brick detail of the main entry corner. Numerous surface changes occur on each side of the building to create interest and shadow elements. City code specifies brick and glass. 5. We are striving to create a pedestrian environment along France Avenue with extensive flower gardens. TangleTown Gardens is the designer of these features, and their passion for unique colorful plants is shown in the enclosed photos. Colored concrete walks and accent lighting will make this area a pleasant visual experience. W 6. Green Building Practices will be implemented for the three phases: building design, construction phase and long term operation of the clinics. RJM Construction has compiled a summary of the Green Practices we will pursue for each phase of the project. 7. The adjacent 4005 W. 65th land parcel will be included for a consistent regional medical master plan. This took substantial effort and negotiation with the building owner. 8. Two areas of the roof will.have a vegetated green roof facing the public way. Special plantings are designed for this application. 9. There will be ongoing seminars with the clinics to evaluate methods and new technology for their clinics— Reduce consumption, Re -use materials, and Recycle waste. The benefit to the building will be reduced operating expenses and good stewardship of our business resources. 1.0. Alternative transportation is a key element of any project. A tangible goal will be to reduce the number of cars coming to the building' which will reduce the parking stalls required to service the clinics. We have provided several successful alternate transportation systems: Designated premium parking spaces for "smart cars" Scooter, motorcycle, bike parking will be an enclosed space that is secure, well lit; and air tempered. We want these employees or patients to know they are recognized for their efforts. Employees may participate in the ZAP chip monitor system which will provide a monthly printout of number of rider days. There will be a calculation of carbon footprint poundage saved to each participant. Hour'Car business has been evaluated for rental cars parked in the ramp. The established bus system will support the need around the hospital and shopping center for the hourly car rental. Th6VTC #6 bus line services multiple stops within 1 block of the building. Additional routes around, Southdale are 515, 538; 539, 578, 579, 684. See the attached graphic 11. The estimated real estate taxes will be over two times the current revenue. The two existing buildings pay $144,000 and the fully assessed Phase I building will likely pay in excess of $380,000. 12. There will be over 70 new medical staff positions, in the building. In addition, there will be 40 -60 construction jobs over 12 months. had. 13. Storm water management will be improved through rate control and water quality. The current site has direct, unrestricted runoff. There is 9% less hard surface area in the new plan than the current buildings, which mean more green space for the community. 14. The current buildings have substantial deferred maintenance. The building exterior, landscaping and parking lot are ready for redevelopment. 15. The new development is using existing utilities and roads in the community. Urban planning considers this good stewardship to reuse existing sites with current infrastructure. 16. The new building .exterior has been enhanced over code to create a significant Gateway image on this corner. - A focal point is the 65th Street pedestrian comer - Detailed brick design on all four sides - Accent lighting on 4 levels - Special landscaping from Tangletown Gardens 17. Every business has a carbon footprint. We will provide information to each clinic to establish a "Carbon Impact Analysis." For the first two years we plan to have seminars for clinic managers discussing ways to reduce their impact and manage more efficiently. PayitGreen Company has set the model to challenge companies to purchase local products to reduce paper correspondence and conserve operational materials. 18. Ramp Enhancements - All columns are clad in architectural precast panels - Architectural features have been added to show interest and shadow lines - The parapet has been extended around the entire structure - Main level arches add special interest - Three colors and finishes to the precast panels create a variety of textures 19. The entrance traffic circle will have an area for a significant piece of art on the center area. We are planning a special commissioning for this feature. AC75— Edina Medical Plaza - May 25, 2012 A NEW VISION FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION The following list of sustainable items have been incorporated into the DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION and OPERATION of the proposed Edina Medical,Plaza. Many elements have been condidered from the materials used to the energy consumed. The theme of reduce, reuse, recycle is supported by the project team's commitment to a sustainable building for patients, employees and the community to enjoy. W K.P No.. 1: Brownfield redevelopment - we are using a site that is already developed . rather than utilizing.a greenfield never developed site. No. 2: Alternative transportation 7 the MTC #6 bus stops at the front door of the site. No. 3: Shelteredi bike and motorcycle ports willbe provided along with a shower facility for employees.. Y No. 4: Storm water quantity control'- storm water management devices will be installed to control the rate of storm water leaving the site. No. 5: Storm water quality control - storm water filtration devices will be installed to 4 control the quality of storm water leaving the site. No. 6: Site lighting is designed to reduce light pollution - strategically placed light poles with appropriate shrouding will be utilized. No. 7: Water efficient landscaping - draught appropriate trees, shrubs and plantings E� will be used. No. 8: Water use reduction - the use of water efficient irrigation and plumbing fixtures. No: 9: Baseline energy performance.- mechanical equpment will be above code minimum energy ratings and ASHRAE standards. No. 10: Storage and collection of recyclables - recycling measures will be taken during construction to ensure that maximum recycling of steel, cardboard and cement products. No. 11: Reuse of materials - existing demolished concrete components will be used on -site for sub -base material. . No. 12: Construction waste, management - we will recycle 50% of demolished building materials:- No. 13: Locally produced materials - empahsis for regionally produced materials. No. 14: Certified wood materials`- FSC certified,wood products will be installed. CORPORATE OFFICE No. 15: Construction indoor air quality management - filtration systems will be 7 CORPORATE CENTER 7003 W. LAKE ST. utilized durin g permanent construction to ensure that s stems are not 7003 _ , SUITE 400 ST, LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 polluted with particulates. PHONE -832 - 600 No. 16: Low emitting materials- all paints, coatings, carpets, adhesives and sealants FAX 952-832-9600 p � � g � � p � REGIONAL OFFICES are low in volitile organic compounds (VOC). 1331 17T STREET No. 17: Green cleaning products that are nontoxic are used:.to protect the SUITE 605 DENVER, CO 80202 environment. PHONE 720898.4488 FAX 720-896-5888 9375 EAST BELL RD. SUITE 202, PHOENIX. A2 85260 PHONE 602- 325 -1450 FAX 952.893.8152 Final comment for the approval of the Droiect The building size at 102,406 sq ft over six levels is very important to create a successful project. Market rents set the overall budget. We are projecting rents to be 20% higher than other buildings in area to absorb the land cost. Redevelopment is difficult when you are purchasing two older buildings. The value for the Developer on the acquisition of the two older buildings is the land. The viability of the development is based on the approval of the 102,406 sq ft project. Thank you for your review and consideration of this project. We are ready to move forward on this outstanding new medical building which will be an enhancement to your Regional Medical Area. A:2--7 54 Existing Conditions Northeast showing 6500 France Building View from Southeast showing 6500 France Building May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA „ ,,, ,,, _ - �-•�. / IN _ OUT i f FS HOSPITAL PARKING RAMP - -- ._..__ -.- _ -- IN OUT CUT - i fA Mir 2�i,22m-1 -- . N GREEN �d ; ROOFS I OUT z � � • �-�.� �►' APAR TMENT RM T BUILDING o" ur G' 35' LOAPIN ZONE IDARKiNG DECK AD I' `— "- � . I 1' �� '•1 '' `� ` OUT RIGHT TURN ILW30' EXIT MY POINT OF FRANCE POINT OF FRANCE N POND LOADING ZONE DELNERY VEHICLE PARKING 1 Site Plan coouNG 6500 France Avenue ,i May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC Alk MUU�T IfE�'EWI'flk�T lY1, w qz2v &- it- . Phase I Main Entry allift 6500 j May 25, 2012 F EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTSINC 1.11 I.T 1AU-11-CA 461i 0 lkj ohm A� Iv i r� Phase 1 View from Northeast Comer May 25, 2012 -= EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC WI NT PE \'tl�N'f/R�1 C'll GJ1� Phase 1 View from Southeast Comer AM M i May 25, 2012 NOMMEOphlb- Phase I View from Southwest Comer May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDI N A MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC K %K)LINT UVEWPUP. F VO. w Phase 1 View from Northwest Comer May 25, 2012 ARCHITECTS FARR EDINA MEDICAL, P ��-• ARCHITECTS INC W)LI \'T 1)k'ELUPfIk \'ICU. X11► (as e b ► , .m Phase 1 Northwest Aerial May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC w r N all ■ i win m � ails . 1 j .:tt.,i -�!':. ` L it ■ 1`' -�;�/ ,y' fl .4 r. / ✓ n );. / WE Phase 2 Main Entry .v May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC AIUU \'T IIk)'kllffMlk\ 1 a w Phase 2 Parking Ramp Entry May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL P /\--l- Il ARCHITECTS INC hU INT PEt'F.L0PUk.%T CD. w V. Phase 2 View from Northeast Comer May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC f1Ol�N7 CIEYELA7Pf1E \7 l'U. lo'. ' ■ • M r Phase 2 View from Southeast Comer May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR E D I ILIA MEDICAL P n-�-` ARCHITECTS INC 411ri NT Isk1'E4 HSik5Il 9 �rrrpG =G��Giii9 � tllllllj ..._ __ I I IIIIIIII ■�.�1 Phase 2 View from Southwest Comer May 25, 2012 F EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA Nl1U \'T 11k 1'ELtNME \'f l'U. Phase 2 View from Northwest Comer May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR E D I ILIA MEDICAL P ARCHITECTS INC ,k)L',%T ,,;,., 4.0, �iii GGGG 4� i Phase 2 North Aerial May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA I1 ARCHITECTS INC %K)LINI UH'ELUV:IE \'ICU, 10.5' Additional building setback for "Podium Effect" which visually shields upper stories Existing Honeylocust trees to remain Arclutectural wall lighting I .l� f I � e southbound Fiance Ave. 71V Decorative Sidewalk 5' wide raised planting area for I We. annuals, perennials and low shrubs I see TangleTown Gardens detail page t'9" w .I}I` T' 5 curb Pedestrian sidewalk at France Avenue looking south ARCHITECTS INC INS 101 EI M ■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ I ■1 ME NMI Wt IW 101111111111111 IN W ■ 11111111 NMI 11111111 I ■1 1 ■1 We. � Possible coffee shop seating W ■ W W W W NOME 11111 11111 ED[NA MEDICAL PLAZA 6500 ■1 �� II� W �W ■ 11 II ■ I ■I ■ I Zvi III Emil May 25, 2012 Planting Concepts for public sidewalk planter areas 6500 France Ave. Dca❑ Lngchnann a Swu 6ndre. Principals Olivia Spyra. Landscape Designer 6500 France Ave. Medical Plaza Dcan Gigclnwnn S SCnll Fndrar Principal: Olivia Spyra. Londnpc Designs Edina. Medical Plaza GGGGG�� iiGiii: maiss� ails a.MsimGi =in .., .. 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 89' Building measurements to the highest point Point of France 6566 France Avenue South 13 Stories - 123' May 25, 2012 Edina Medical Plaza Fairview Southdale Hospital its ■ �iiGG'ii i'riiii: G�ii■ i�i���ii v.- -_o . .. ■ ■ . �"' r � � � N � � . M f■ ■i G ii i Big .+ .. "s'._�'s r s ■■ M 1 •�� � ,•t .` 0 � ` No- � ■ �� � ■ �'I' �rt • (^u r !, ..' IMF � � 'r � ■ t} ■ ■ ■ ■ � � � - - _ � 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 89' Building measurements to the highest point 6401 - 6405 France Avenue South 4 & 8 Stories - 124' May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA � I' f0.lUNT 1iEYE4�Mf{kV7 CO. Edina Medical Plaza GGGGGii GGG�i"iG Sri Gs®® mum ��.. �" • _.- _ . ii i�:: i iii r—'i �� „�,. Vow ® vas - s; 1 � Oro ,G I �- , 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 89' Building measurements to the highest point EDWARD FARR _ ARCHITECTS INC Southdale Medical Center 6545 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 92' EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA May 25, 2012 Edina Medical Plaza. GiGGOii iiia MEN III=! i• aiii:G® Milo _iceMisw® WNW wl- a�0 6500 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 89' Building measurements to the highest point 1 'V t71 . . ...i Al Southdale Office Centre 6600 & 6800 France Avenue South 6 & 7 Stories - 99' May 25, 2012 E_DW_ARDFARR EDINA MEDICAL, P � I� ARCHITECTS INC NOUN1 Uk1'FkuPftkVY CtI. S 6500 France Avenue May 25, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITE CS INC EDILA MEDICAL PLAZA MOUNT UlVkU)PMENT CO, �popmOC9lE -j; 1 O rem .� INN Sol.— Ilk Green Roof Guardrail close -up June 6, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA U!VlLtN MF \T CI. 1 O rem _' jimmmm MENNImIo � � ��■� 011111 NMI �1 E= men � - im ICI m 1111 NMI 11111 11111 1111 NMI M I ■I M M IMI ■ MINIM N IMI N .11111 NMI mi Iml m —�w -_. NOW.- n —009 m__ w` n --on m� NO.- n �w �m ■ice n Phase I East Elevation with Green Roof Guardrail June 6, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA M E D I CAL P �-�. ARCHITECTS INC .- Lc�k�9L�U U Lz► Fl -i - ��; Tam Of OPEN , go, i ivii III I.Z Z- W. Phase I Northeast Comer with Green Guardrail June 6, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC M0 now am - Now 4. 1071,40 11 0 ml m goo ■ mmi-ft a 6500 u '70'-1 J NMI Phase I Main Entry with Green Roof Guardrail June 6, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA LIE; � Lcmi U I 6-pr-I�ID 4� a� d Z —I _ 1 3 ' U X \494) Bus Routes Dian• Lake 761 7. 51.1 © Met oTransit 1 -•is 51 W b iVUmn:. flop ID: 1 156 • Rpw•Y -SUUm 2 • a5 5t lV d cal vvla Fw.Y•'. n Slap IG 4:64 . kaw 6- IVO(Ih 3.6551Wd[Atu AVS $IpV ID 118] . Ra•146 -Nam 4 - FIapC1D 41790 • Rau a- rwre� s -Omvwv S a 6s st w SV 0 491b . Rase a. soon . Ross iid lE.p1>sl 50� 6 - -. .-ce nv 53416314r 16716 . F.p14pfi -Soon 7. .; AW d Vasty VV:a Ra >wa 10 52654 . Fot.6 Sa4n b S1 W b V4110y YMa Ra ;lap Ifv, 5;553 • Ratt6-- 9•V."— Ra S 65. vv Slap b 1116 . Ro:4t 5371E +a +u1 Nc1m 10 • %1a1,b Pv S S rlav 62, K. S. W :t_p IJ 57791 • 'ade6 -NMn 11- f—At 5 t 16220 Stop 10 -.197 • Rovm 6 • So -St W d[:rww AVa ctw 0.4370 • Rpub6 -74am ,3 VM"Vow Rd 6 6 WW SM b. 1761 • la.. 5671E.pu »I -Sau8e I4. a a.Rtd65slvl o:ap ID 1W • �.pwt S]b lE.pnM -I/p1A 15•�+7ty vww R4 aG651W ' —PO . 41049 • 9— 55716+pt+.1- NVM M • Va wl V1aw R4 d alwl.rlvn i.• .=w 43 1117 • Rout 6 • H.. • kQW* 567'Esp+.il I:YM 17. `ll y V.. Rd d W—k-n 1•v _':pp ID. 1279 • How 6 Sawn • P.1,'67 iE--) - Sown 1 -11Av5 d625tW S.P. Ln4 >.p numum I A'e0� 1pwar 67 0 1e Lr 1161+ aT 17 i16 +`4 71 N Is o ux.lw 441 . a1K A 1 e•s w 5Wp 4i 1156 • Ap.N 6 Natn I6 •.1an�. Av S L 42 SI N Slop Kr 1157 • Row d • 3anA • 6— Ra d 16417.6441 bwp 10 4i.6 . RoW 5741E • p+>II - soon it • 0— RI d 16417.6447 SWPW 4946 • R.tb sn a.ptt.... p—, 22. Old SI V d Hrrw RI d'ap W 4566 RW 6 . Nan • Rank 516. yy1Y i•VMgv1. 66/W SlopW i1.3d 1W • RJU1t 4c /tE +ptMlNam 74. >.b1 V•rw R1 L W 31 W ' -wp 1D -6136 • Rault 657 tliaprtNl • lnO1 S6 • rlaµt AV 3 s vt444q Av Slap ID .196 • Ryuts -N �/ • Fllnit Av S d M1Wv AY Swp o. S. • Rmw.e -saY1� r r General Information Why ZAP? Easy to Use An Ounce of Prevention Save the Planet Car Parking is Expensive How Does It Work? 1 JZ)OERQ ® B I K E R A C K 5 I L®1 WWW JeWo 04,01 Eon, I.VVV 337(0729 Many organizations in the private, public and non- prolit sectors want to promote commuting by bike as an environmentally friendly and healthful transportation alternative. To got bike commuting rolling they need a practical way to tally and manage bike trip data. Dero has the solution — Dero ZAP. Dero ZAP is a solar- powered, automated RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) systern with integrated hardware and software. Via a vveb -based interface to the Dero ZAP system software, participants are enrolled and registered with a unique RFID tag. The tamper -proof tags are attached to the spokes of each participant's bike's front wheel. ZAP units mounted on steel poles around your campus identify registered bikes from up to 30 feet away. W 1,'lW..iCYO.Ga41', LOUY/.337ia72% �• 0 IKE FILE The (like File is our most space efficient u -lock cunlpalible product. Sturdy sliding hangers allow rune bikes to be securely stored in an eight -loot section while allowing for easy loading and unloading of bikes. Ceiling mount, wall mount and floor mount options are available. www.Jeroc -ow I- VVfi.33702.9 �YI a.a....ry..LJrwj_ V Car ownership is so vestca day. With HOURCAR you call reserve near when you need it, drive it where you want lo, let someone ebw lvorly about car paymlents, parking, insurance, gas, and maintenance, and be, n em ironnlental superstar. At the same lino! I- IOURGUt in file smart way to drive. I iOURCAIt otters , ,, . I,„ .I -iAin Minneapolis and Saint Paul. hind out where your nearest I10URCAR lives, and aiaullr_Uri ll.to drive today. y r :r A �r r• W.. sk IR11rItC —\R Co- — -- -- — — S winswo I-N—"h •v • 1SS 1 file I:Irrh•ir Car" Ccr,,,.nin3 Lrllft_i a a I! n; Ir�C'1 -1" u�`-. r! . ^- 51tiL••!'I`hLlr +.u- vs•rnio-tl Nov*~ 2, 2011 On Monday, Noventbor 14. HOURCAR Is co- sporlw4q a syec41 5ueehu J the sequel to the hit dccumenlary 'Who Killed the Electric Carl" Sponsored by 1 _ - h 1' ,,...v _ , this special event includes a pre - screening reception and a panel discussion alter the fdm with director Chris Paine and Fresh Energy Exewtive Director Michael Nob- New Plug-in 1.101IRCAR -loin ti,yl Paul Plr� I'n �tJ] Ull /lrllln•K•Ith);:-1N!111.3!]. October 4, 7011 smart Expressions open your mind. smart fortwo electric drive >> the next generation of smart I hrWr wt% tbl omvl a�tlrmem wg mr I m a %ar Lk.6a wweamw �. E X1.ao w Ih ba N D. 6rah � Mark RausN, PE D+4 ua. m.47680 . i 1 - _------- - - - - -- _ I Tines �27ge. FlDL DEPTH SAw - — -- - — -- — — a .. � - �,°•,.,� _ FULL DEPTH SAiOIf . - PROTECr `Ew51IR0 TI8E55 .. \ I. - I,' &89'44'29' ' r sl( E _ I ADDS 65M ST. S. r ' I I PASfl@1T 2_ T 88Ipt 6500 IR M AM S IH z -sw wa/ moc u.. II DO -_ ..1 3002624140006 M & 1- '`LI I .� RIa orE euauRC 4 r ASSOOAIFD U.LLS. flF.SEM ' L]l.l .11' N w EMUTEMUNG, INC. W I UTIITr TYP 91� Ile, � � 1�.� YDa PABEAVE SOVI'R, SN'8800 I I.. . +_. ° .•! 1 ,^ ` 1GNf18APOLLA MN16 6 I 455(OTT&UTLmm I mn 4U^.. FAX MID 1P1T6&2080 E `� I YAL"r EM I• ,_ II IL..�Fp51D�MA AN SMOTAM - .�11 FAX MID T6b8098 I II 11 ID10t'J�TCI6 �� 1 < 1 `,DX 0 m UTKM tE Al K_ T . 8 N \ � i I — .- '- laels� _ ?..( ® AIM EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA _ RE- ZONING ,. _ Q roMU�MITTAL T aogs� 8800 FRANCE AVENGE SOUTH n _ _. - _ .PwuL aaxr EDLW AONESOTA 0 10 m 40 mmo TREES su2E 1x IEET - 5 LEGEND: REMOVAL NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: clTr suR41TTeL ss /zvzolz 5 � — »= am�.a.� � —• —•— � aw...e ate. °m•°" e... '� ,.,� �.wuu .w �cw � unl�a amn m o � ® o� ,e..w. ❑ EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMO PLAN 77 11.064 C1.0 . � /./ I iwtiaem la tm llm a ' w°j Eealsa ,oO1r M Ya V 1h atah . ar I [ I wrk S Ra uatli. PE t�11111Yi W Oat, aaa. ft. 43480 I EMU a � N! LEGEND: ___ -_____ OIDOO °� 148.4 of '• . , NTD' '(SE.IalA�1O RAN) �.. - LONO�TE AN59-OWYE � T. `�- IEYOYE SiWPWC�..- ; S ?RC , � S (SE QUtlt10 RAN) _J 4 — � sWO. lac RTO' OPrO.Lal wO07rt ® rlP Aa➢aMr 5 SOE1Atlt }�,. • • .�?' �_ - � - -5 AUY. T :1 \ ,17 • - ...�� .. WST�7,BF10[D �'- )N lKmissn�d1p1uuj . SITE DATA CA1E 4v 90'. I Q 11M' 17 9' SDENAtIt \STOP• b' �EYLWf �EMILt CQrCF1E _., - ' Olemn —OUT I AN a0 0 M b __ _ - I ' •SIOY .w Ger RN p. ctrl suen SITE PLAN NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: PAVING NOTES rcre snslzmz [Q�`: �n .a m w°�tm. um w � ""' °[ A"�•ma +.. �a m.m m m� ��� w m.. o .. ma mxum .m, 'm�� ® ,m. mm.s�n ..ma w. s a-m. o a -vim p � .P. °K �� SITE PLAN .aa.�Y ° PArawAlL aK i wmL �� YIaL m°vv do.a K ° rm 4/aG aw[Y,u¢IYL L.A y. Prm °.mam "o aQ mo -"m mw wm ®� q "n mmAV V � .[ti � '� �' :� � •1+U • •`, [l� $N.[ Mir C3.0 11.064 /./ [ t�11111Yi W I EMU a � N! ENGDTKKRING. INC, M&U MEDICAL �16 PLAZA MITTAL I 6500 FRMCE AVEME 60!:L a0 0 M b __ _ - I ' •SIOY .w Ger RN p. ctrl suen SITE PLAN NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: PAVING NOTES rcre snslzmz [Q�`: �n .a m w°�tm. um w � ""' °[ A"�•ma +.. �a m.m m m� ��� w m.. o .. ma mxum .m, 'm�� ® ,m. mm.s�n ..ma w. s a-m. o a -vim p � .P. °K �� SITE PLAN .aa.�Y ° PArawAlL aK i wmL �� YIaL m°vv do.a K ° rm 4/aG aw[Y,u¢IYL L.A y. Prm °.mam "o aQ mo -"m mw wm ®� q "n mmAV V � .[ti � '� �' :� � •1+U • •`, [l� $N.[ Mir C3.0 11.064 PRWECr DATA wAm•vuau.cn /2Nwrw w.r..lren.d: uln.wdA.a.x �eew.r.mro.a wvNnr xNw; .Pel. w.rr.w N r.un r.ouafi efi..l.rvoe nn AI.e W afiN m+An.M reuq Avy w..n fimr . ®A+sPN.wnlusm/- �whwnmlwewua..m rM.n x.anm,elfilw410i�iPm Nn /9451D/.mNh wRwe I wA�w.wl P.v.O N.�.Ye,otp waidl.A.a Y:eNw -.Y 1..WNe1r..Ilfi WBa r-.bno we�PnNF: -1 r11.NL M.tr4011Mn. wA1pPN.wRYOMNpwwR1•p,lwpnl 1pW r.ne WANUwwnro .R luwll� nhFNw061P.:hY,YhNA Meewl elm- WSppw.NR •°•tea •°••e.R hwe• suer Pr/weeNde,.l aWimpd mMdw.•••ildnR.w m°•wi. ,u°%/. ®•M� ax]Am0e1 f•Itl.euPnpwy lSe.YY etl00 —.,A arehsFwe.t x•,a �rcnsv� l.,e: ava ma fW 3YdAYO• Lxa Wm Wo mo • 09d..eNNh.ernpt•Nhw MATT F T mum s R e 5 e 6 FAMY" =TWJx NOWIT/a N0 — IF1 Wills :��•�q \ ■ \►1w� \ ■�R� \ ■ ■r_ ".• \ ■ ■■ ■AID I■ ■�q�� 'DOD° = .rrJ06� ^rtis0J�0�1jd0�a�r�� 'S u aerm ■his r.1 C.L .cok7. K ■r Y- it /; � � L-J � •,. O O J O O_ 0 M PARKING DECK Iro l \�EDICAL OFFICE BLDG. °' ■i�l OUT MINT W IWOE wnu° xea Op4i6 Hill 2! POpI ff F4AVLE lTPEET m1Yrpr ipYOf p/Aipn 1 N.1.ly e .1 1 /C MN/ f p e/n p 1p ph O l ° DRAWING INOER At.t NONeYn SI0 F1N 41ARnry fie e.BO lOwibe9.AiN0b F9n pees BYgn Ge OIA,y OraMge, E a 6 LeNRI f.SOlMbwhi pelAevaN Plh1 AOe r.nhelelNl ALI F1AFla°Olbem Pme°ImI, .. A2x Fbn OPwrE FetlN IA.pl2 ALY TaTYP gs Flu AN M.1fbY Wn ASI RI.N I NeA D.la' Alt Ri..181e EYdbN I:I� \C!Altl I-: AklI - r C -1 �RRPDMMNxC4 EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA RE- ZONING SUBMITTAL x.n,a, 41700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MINNESOTA I..N. Fr/ One CRYQL SU&NITTAL 05 /25%2012 G ./ 111. SITE PLAN nn Nom— snn Nwl./ 11.084 AM SILT FENCE (TYP.) . ` TEMPORARY ROCK �. ' • CONSTRUCTION- ENTRANCE- ' I Mrwy orf� r bl fv pun. EWX��' �rfM 4o N IINi•S Muk Ra—h. PE ml. eq. m.4348D rl 1YMMr Sit 1 �c° 3k 1 s >~ AT'T'IANT ENGRMaa NG. LNC. ------ <E--�1 MPARKAVILS017M SUrr M SSQiHSMOfLL 6 66.16 PKONS(BeRlea&1880 PAA (0111 18&9086 +410 --j �1,I I�aI I N - DOUBLE ROW OF SILT r - • �_� _— . / \ \r- w` FENCE W/ TEMPORARY.:: 2 - BERM REINFORCEMENT" EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA REZONING R® I I 1;1SU�MITTAL v r sur , I 8500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EOINA. MINNESOTA s GRADING LEGEND: i - EosnYCwYUa GRADING NOTES: � — — n"p°�m Cp"0� • 410Y M91a 1. ud nnsYCO wctts soma sour] .Y•r aoY ppoposa wmwcz •r e. m® ropwd waoa ro wr eeosreuamx. musE aroawu on ane la. wd unnr wsml•rmx e.amu soma ee w•an .Yp mYMnm w YYSYUY QMOE 6201{ OnmlE 149814. PaaL IF 9BlE). LLCd10N1[E I.M SPE RSTYC K r 1�1➢NEV WR WveM � wmrmm sva nnuo. SP[CV14�a6. RtPMpa•neYa wCWOf m•aYe ' 1 � o. sr.mwe Tmsmurnw. rue rmm�cron sYeu aE erwne .rm su w urrs xor w�xe a warts w rwrxxESs 9 OPM+1eE 6aunw - uvar mE a�s-me m.'"`oaw�°"a"`o' sod w .e ©Imw¢ � �ro YYrt wa rwr .0 w.aw¢o rooms r+m mE eow.nEO Min M rxc 1u slwr. oe nY rouawxe 111E puouwoYms a< rle an um lomor. carsrYUCno. cY r•me4nax pon:on•as v s„woum n66clw, � FlJ]Alpx Y ua n¢0°lnLnw Y.s sear], .lm rx0awrx+ _ ma 1Awnama um wmem sues . sa 1 xP1iY 00111fn SALE aE WL m (880)1!] -1160. b 110116 Paai REVRYFD 6LL 81•x6 .M OMFrI Oa1p6nR •RRTID Br •IL OF IIQ UZ - at vrYelmrt ♦ EYOCw. 11nm Yanwc m suwr or eel6allnml. coovnlc wlxam�. - a tar a• - Ima - � a rtcr o1 nwmrr . osx S Immm smM se>,a a wmaomns ro eolFam .1111 an a sus mrswmm • aalnwe ame a: ac.9a) smE vaES - u+a>Y wluas - ros 1 ° �ii+a¢1 1u awo a .mw a rtxm+n¢ 1�ns a. m avnwY ,� —>— __.._ _ om�Ml sal sale s�rrmnla6 spemxwwl. !urn Eanm• um mwvee ssru nm wxn an¢n .rwwm am 16.em ant. au sxan, eE A,s® .mw a suelYalc YEnno fuwmsm e< sYawm) swA � .cwrm as ;1 Sur 1o[c/mr6rwlt1ml unrs > oa C96rxa'Ilex EYMr10L5 SxrL eE MwOEB a nd •ea.'E •xp 1 1a�r mD1 ns vwtM 'w6rlutnal rs»s em1R 6ewwm s>m mn12 •Im • lemon v- •• mrm � �. E C arrtn anmai na rnm+u cwlwcrm 116r o 5165 a.•r[wlc curs .1111 .0 d carlliela ro 1®• alpr rc no-: aural wxxNE AMI ox SIIE 11. 9ME6mn66E161s m voar woes CIS s owrome 6 la �� xarts •rm wmaAwa soma w wau ®w � 1¢auert, alemle ev6rmlcnw rnsm•craa smao rn16w urn ten% � x comma 1®EClax •IM ExM®1 rY pErO6a¢ .pplma.a SOd C06¢rnal. rE8r06 'IS Wxle.Yn08 9w11 tOaaa•4 Iwvrr/Ixel[ OAlIrtS Io1WreS .g a ex08alr IIE w12T wlolmnx ' :lutes .cm 1msw+ ww°p�`1ErrriO9acaomromxs .rm wean sus .s ,M1r¢ mni nYOmla, bur world nc. Iecolmamxs. 12 xrd Hanes .Imp W.pFis�9,warrOULDVIC� oEnlssm mY arc s moo'giv Mal ' I Mrwy orf� r bl fv pun. EWX��' �rfM 4o N IINi•S Muk Ra—h. PE ml. eq. m.4348D rl 1YMMr Sit 1 �c° 3k 1 s >~ AT'T'IANT ENGRMaa NG. LNC. ------ <E--�1 MPARKAVILS017M SUrr M SSQiHSMOfLL 6 66.16 PKONS(BeRlea&1880 PAA (0111 18&9086 +410 --j �1,I I�aI I N - DOUBLE ROW OF SILT r - • �_� _— . / \ \r- w` FENCE W/ TEMPORARY.:: 2 - BERM REINFORCEMENT" EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA REZONING R® I I 1;1SU�MITTAL v r sur , I 8500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EOINA. MINNESOTA s GRADING LEGEND: i - EosnYCwYUa GRADING NOTES: � — — n"p°�m Cp"0� • 410Y M91a 1. ud nnsYCO wctts soma sour] .Y•r aoY ppoposa wmwcz •r e. m® ropwd waoa ro wr eeosreuamx. musE aroawu on ane la. wd unnr wsml•rmx e.amu soma ee w•an .Yp mYMnm w YYSYUY QMOE 6201{ OnmlE 149814. PaaL IF 9BlE). LLCd10N1[E I.M SPE RSTYC K r 1�1➢NEV WR WveM � wmrmm sva nnuo. SP[CV14�a6. RtPMpa•neYa wCWOf m•aYe ' 1 � o. sr.mwe Tmsmurnw. rue rmm�cron sYeu aE erwne .rm su w urrs xor w�xe a warts w rwrxxESs 9 OPM+1eE 6aunw - uvar mE a�s-me m.'"`oaw�°"a"`o' sod w .e ©Imw¢ � �ro YYrt wa rwr .0 w.aw¢o rooms r+m mE eow.nEO Min M rxc 1u slwr. oe nY rouawxe 111E puouwoYms a< rle an um lomor. carsrYUCno. cY r•me4nax pon:on•as v s„woum n66clw, � FlJ]Alpx Y ua n¢0°lnLnw Y.s sear], .lm rx0awrx+ _ ma 1Awnama um wmem sues . sa 1 xP1iY 00111fn SALE aE WL m (880)1!] -1160. b 110116 Paai REVRYFD 6LL 81•x6 .M OMFrI Oa1p6nR •RRTID Br •IL OF IIQ UZ - at vrYelmrt ♦ EYOCw. 11nm Yanwc m suwr or eel6allnml. coovnlc wlxam�. - a tar a• - Ima - � a rtcr o1 nwmrr . osx S Immm smM se>,a a wmaomns ro eolFam .1111 an a sus mrswmm • aalnwe ame a: ac.9a) smE vaES - u+a>Y wluas - ros 1 ° �ii+a¢1 1u awo a .mw a rtxm+n¢ 1�ns a. m avnwY ,� —>— __.._ _ om�Ml sal sale s�rrmnla6 spemxwwl. !urn Eanm• um mwvee ssru nm wxn an¢n .rwwm am 16.em ant. au sxan, eE A,s® .mw a suelYalc YEnno fuwmsm e< sYawm) swA � .cwrm as ;1 Sur 1o[c/mr6rwlt1ml unrs > oa C96rxa'Ilex EYMr10L5 SxrL eE MwOEB a nd •ea.'E •xp 1 1a�r mD1 ns vwtM 'w6rlutnal rs»s em1R 6ewwm s>m mn12 •Im • lemon v- •• mrm � �. E C arrtn anmai na rnm+u cwlwcrm 116r o 5165 a.•r[wlc curs .1111 .0 d carlliela ro 1®• alpr rc no-: aural wxxNE AMI ox SIIE 11. 9ME6mn66E161s m voar woes CIS s owrome 6 la �� xarts •rm wmaAwa soma w wau ®w � 1¢auert, alemle ev6rmlcnw rnsm•craa smao rn16w urn ten% � x comma 1®EClax •IM ExM®1 rY pErO6a¢ .pplma.a SOd C06¢rnal. rE8r06 'IS Wxle.Yn08 9w11 tOaaa•4 Iwvrr/Ixel[ OAlIrtS Io1WreS .g a ex08alr IIE w12T wlolmnx ' :lutes .cm 1msw+ ww°p�`1ErrriO9acaomromxs .rm wean sus .s ,M1r¢ mni nYOmla, bur world nc. Iecolmamxs. 12 xrd Hanes .Imp W.pFis�9,warrOULDVIC� oEnlssm mY arc s Lane Fr mre CITY SUBMITTAL 5/25/2012 611.1 nlrr GRADING. EROSION, AND SEDNBIT CONTROL PLAN ne IE�— sel.l�. 11.064 C4.0 ' � 1 mmr w.rar lul rnN Pw °I .. �xr ExweF vinn.,,«u ENmn PWr rN I.0 e1 rN 6X1.1 m MIRK RAUS RAUSCN., PE - WlI Rep. Xp.1.T100 •O.AISi N•ND HOIE ;;. ro ANAE mAOE,. ��S• V -1Y CpW Mtp ' - vc�ro 1wvE 4D]ynRP _ r w Q `' 10 �I I- l" ENGUMLINN C. INC. Tad PARK AVE. SOUTH, 611R'E 8W BUNNEAPOUS. 2Ud fil 3 PHONR (610 n6E0e0 FAX (612) 768•300 _ - ... - ule]n xoxe nrwl Puaw Inwo pDW 91uL wxvLr Wlm a wcxa w nmplLSS ma eow•e1w fOSNx IPbFlkPgll• EIFCIat ME Lm FNCIrrQE,AIxO OL SINIOMpS. NA UIRIIIfS MpPo( Oa9A OF mE r¢l SM.ILL m ME AIIDYpx PEAC01ODC5 P F11•r10E •vFNUL Ra SN4L CM0.r Vrm crew mN1O1R0 Pwxro0. . r �: O •. Al wM01 GWm0. uLA6VPf6 uU6r 6E a 0..V¢ AeLu 3 N $710 ___- '. Te6100 PE1aF �' ;. :'rAwlLmAnox eEnowc, E w'4P asn N9 Ql -RE rEN,7 E 87.-.(E)7 .�.en.SL(NE) U -. - E"$1°i6 5'X10°1 �' cn.+R•cla ro mD.IDE cwPDlx•wx FaR 1OLwr0uE L6, xn�xw 2 FLm of P.vo1a[r - 1 fi (SFE OErW @7247(Q-Ir, c maw I,. F C i IXmwc rxlwuAW o LILCTex: Gana coxxECnW1 mx ]HE aavDmpE mmcE - pLLOr a RLr rc P.vawr - pai COnNe. - BOOW uNOSWE SUS4.2S . pM _. a6]wp 10IDF1Y WUIO Rwi <PiC [6L SNWID BE rA1NUr a PwwD•LE POWS OF M OPpWY y ; PrA1[I� SxA1�Ir '(�OETAU "' -__ __ y- .pt'.. - a P Dw•10•16 6 IRp1Y® OVaxL Iu¢m1c11a wx1R.nW+ uOmUpE CORIM. xpeP/Lx, CIALE IIlL SxOxD BE Mwm —LT mema uPxowa.lEm"'"Wranmo° '. 1°[ �x0 DolmWar "�cax�ISar. MwE •xp 1 A]r T w.pP la elOEHfTOOE'R{O►1Y7RC0. a 11.064 C5.0 a I NA MEDICAL "s PLAZA IU�M TTAL 0000 FRANCE AVENUE SOWN EOWA, MINNESOTA Foe must EoMWC M LEGEND . \ - - _ eELO4a ro wulEVUm InueO Fpr m1I su&IITTAL 7 ->- reW65m smW Saw UTA.JTY NOTES GENERAL NOTES 5 w —,— PAa�m WFmm'sl.eR - I - PMP® olourlW '' 06 w 1RO PIS roN4W61Rf1�4a OEV•rx16 9WL m T. OEr srCS r nrx mlru mu••r• a IwE 9ulE m /M x -,z LWM wrW W Wf M v I , m Of �Sr6 WILTWa �1 NL RRIIS IWrI ro ME 4:. 10' V .IY Cpw PVC '• '.' ape V 12' Cpw PVC - 1I. s]aW saw asaxs arNL m xmux m Laep•Inrr. - n V,,r.. 3 .xp P r vaal '. � � + �� 1r-er s r/ Pvc ro xwE�AP]M � ,�I -I -I ICI -I -III slI I- I _ _ --- ce i - --� ------ 1iAG_lEE______ I 1 - -- 4101 e4Ae� ]a01 •rorem mP-V. 4,G 61916 w wlma w w'omrt m eE n � � �• ma G -eff a 01,01 4PNNID leG9eL w a -69REI @ Ae.mmnaaelswe +yg1eluG S I E 76.1 IE er6 • 110 V e- ww PVC \ ,ax=a .. \ II I I I .. R ROOF MAW CONNECTa 8,0 0: e]e.0 2.1]6' / __ _. Je? m -,Y M.. 2" wpDING ROOF MAIN COHNErnOV 1 ♦\� • .' I I IIW 12' NOPE O _ - -NV 1(ME O 2M PE e922 ¢ eis,6(p IE G NDPE O ,jR d1✓ErnowAL Ra¢ ,•'' ' I I I' • . PROVIDE ENERQNLY _ OVERFLOW AT ,9' MOVE MME AT R41P >� > •.. E e]aw ( N' DIA PROVIDE ENERQxCr I OVFIOLOW • 1� C'AC •T' - I ,AOF.,•' IIDPE M11- I NAIL FA6 � _ V . WIOWC FACE I —•xi , G r /]eb WOO 6• Pvc iEANa a -- I e M.W (exeEiw' R _ � OFFICE I I PARKING RAMP W e 83 (N) E en.w (s) o __MEDICAL BUILDING I ... (SEE ARCNITECTURAU \ (S EE ARCMTECTURAU e -AS ewD •\ I ceux Ihh E an.0 ��V� E e]6.1a f () COrvxE99N _'\ _� y �'psloir IIpI1 •III alen°0�oa - 6 E1pSTNG vLVE . IE COL 1>EPI,pCE M.,: 1 0 V ,Y. CFW PK mfY VALVE 901' 1 V 1211 p m-- AS NEfEEARf prF MAW wW1ECDM 2 1 9]x.1] (S), Ae' NA - - - I I - I 1Y-x5' BF)1D r/ - -PW -ro IIDPE MMNI _ _ 'E 9 I t2- _ _ _PpDNOE FWiQ]ICV- - _ GUIDING ROOF MAW COXxE smo - __ _ _ �- SW 4pV� - �,31F -e'_ 1 Q IprA: \ 12' -xr ®0 •. OFF ETSMO SIN iARY EW R•rP. WALL FACE _ OV M AT 1e' GUM A RAUP rA(L FACE _ _ - _ _ 16V ,? NAPE a SM PROVIDE ICI-, OV£RFLM 19' MOVE , IQ MME AT OOIIL G (WC. t0' V00 W'm) 1 : ysmv 7A' rYE I - 1 WSTALL-QEAMQIT -AT RAID _ _ _ _ .- fffLLL � "FACE - 11eW'E660:50 I - ' � 1 mmr w.rar lul rnN Pw °I .. �xr ExweF vinn.,,«u ENmn PWr rN I.0 e1 rN 6X1.1 m MIRK RAUS RAUSCN., PE - WlI Rep. Xp.1.T100 •O.AISi N•ND HOIE ;;. ro ANAE mAOE,. ��S• V -1Y CpW Mtp ' - vc�ro 1wvE 4D]ynRP _ r w Q `' 10 �I I- l" ENGUMLINN C. INC. Tad PARK AVE. SOUTH, 611R'E 8W BUNNEAPOUS. 2Ud fil 3 PHONR (610 n6E0e0 FAX (612) 768•300 - _ - ... - ule]n xoxe nrwl Puaw Inwo pDW 91uL wxvLr Wlm a wcxa w nmplLSS ma eow•e1w fOSNx IPbFlkPgll• EIFCIat ME Lm FNCIrrQE,AIxO OL SINIOMpS. NA UIRIIIfS MpPo( Oa9A OF mE r¢l SM.ILL m ME AIIDYpx PEAC01ODC5 P F11•r10E •vFNUL Ra SN4L CM0.r Vrm crew mN1O1R0 Pwxro0. . r �: O •. Al wM01 GWm0. uLA6VPf6 uU6r 6E a 0..V¢ AeLu 3 N $710 ___- '. Te6100 PE1aF �' ;. :'rAwlLmAnox eEnowc, E w'4P asn N9 Ql -RE rEN,7 E 87.-.(E)7 .�.en.SL(NE) U -. - E"$1°i6 5'X10°1 �' cn.+R•cla ro mD.IDE cwPDlx•wx FaR 1OLwr0uE L6, xn�xw 2 FLm of P.vo1a[r - 1 fi (SFE OErW @7247(Q-Ir, c maw o: eT F C IXmwc rxlwuAW o LILCTex: Gana coxxECnW1 mx ]HE aavDmpE mmcE - pLLOr a RLr rc P.vawr - pai COnNe. - BOOW uNOSWE SUS4.2S . pM _. a6]wp 10IDF1Y WUIO Rwi <PiC [6L SNWID BE rA1NUr a PwwD•LE POWS OF M OPpWY y ; PrA1[I� SxA1�Ir '(�OETAU "' -__ __ y- .pt'.. - a P Dw•10•16 6 IRp1Y® OVaxL Iu¢m1c11a wx1R.nW+ uOmUpE CORIM. xpeP/Lx, CIALE IIlL SxOxD BE Mwm —LT mema uPxowa.lEm"'"Wranmo° '. 1°[ �x0 DolmWar "�cax�ISar. MwE •xp 1 A]r T w.pP la elOEHfTOOE'R{O►1Y7RC0. a 11.064 C5.0 a I NA MEDICAL "s PLAZA IU�M TTAL 0000 FRANCE AVENUE SOWN EOWA, MINNESOTA LEGEND InueO Fpr m1I su&IITTAL 7 ->- reW65m smW Saw UTA.JTY NOTES GENERAL NOTES 5 w —,— PAa�m WFmm'sl.eR - I - PMP® olourlW '' 06 w 1RO PIS roN4W61Rf1�4a OEV•rx16 9WL m T. OEr srCS r nrx mlru mu••r• a IwE 9ulE m /M x -,z LWM wrW W Wf M v I , m Of �Sr6 WILTWa �1 NL RRIIS IWrI ro ME 4:. EITT 5]25%2012 z NI.1aw • ax 1e voTnE swama •r AIA we aamrw¢ a WL PxaEa eaA1m mulws WwL 6E Ammar orpaa 1I. s]aW saw asaxs arNL m xmux m Laep•Inrr. - n V,,r.. 3 .xp P r vaal '. � � + �� R • PIIDwSLp SWIW1r II•rW01E - a6TUle s+rmwW uvwLlt 1 P ��n.eim w wcE 4101 e4Ae� ]a01 •rorem mP-V. 4,G 61916 w wlma w w'omrt m eE n � � �• ma G -eff a 01,01 4PNNID leG9eL w a -69REI @ Ae.mmnaaelswe +yg1eluG S �1qC 91X1 pVwOF/C9Cx 8�1 a •xo sTan aww um vEm4• xaaz�a:E .om rpm sm rzi peA�wvc*w 1e9m211IX15 •w/a SPFLJII400HS 5®a IWrt ,ax=a �� ri�' - Lw61px xrpxuD vupe SOVAwM 6 IER TYW 6'. lscprprwwlmr6 p.010E P,A4+c s1DML Ixp su w uF6 1 SIaALE 6 u•IWMS a mIWUaT SN.LLL xOT of � wax slmErs m r11w P,lax awr pF „ 6 %� - _ - ... - ule]n xoxe nrwl Puaw Inwo pDW 91uL wxvLr Wlm a wcxa w nmplLSS ma eow•e1w fOSNx IPbFlkPgll• EIFCIat ME Lm FNCIrrQE,AIxO OL SINIOMpS. NA UIRIIIfS MpPo( Oa9A OF mE r¢l SM.ILL m ME AIIDYpx PEAC01ODC5 P F11•r10E •vFNUL Ra SN4L CM0.r Vrm crew mN1O1R0 Pwxro0. . r �: O •. Al wM01 GWm0. uLA6VPf6 uU6r 6E a 0..V¢ AeLu SIw1 IiNI - IX6TxC STOW haw DVmr¢FWrx a9Cx mNewOS - a]Dx FO1xWrpM •x0 vrram SIAM . ux - arwpx 9AW -paw ro uWn cpxsmurnox. e0a ro wmw+ coma AA6 UTILITY PLAN U -. - E"$1°i6 5'X10°1 �' cn.+R•cla ro mD.IDE cwPDlx•wx FaR 1OLwr0uE L6, xn�xw 2 FLm of P.vo1a[r - 1 fi s. Lw�w m•1E DxE 4u u xwla w •w.w¢ aF F C _. -. IXmwc rxlwuAW o LILCTex: Gana coxxECnW1 mx ]HE aavDmpE mmcE - pLLOr a RLr rc P.vawr - pai COnNe. - BOOW uNOSWE SUS4.2S . pM _. a6]wp 10IDF1Y WUIO Rwi <PiC [6L SNWID BE rA1NUr a PwwD•LE POWS OF M OPpWY IWXwiA ' 9. PROApE 101PpwMR TmRt wlr[ROL W COewWCE xiW PrA1[I� SxA1�Ir a P Dw•10•16 6 IRp1Y® OVaxL Iu¢m1c11a wx1R.nW+ uOmUpE CORIM. xpeP/Lx, CIALE IIlL SxOxD BE Mwm —LT mema uPxowa.lEm"'"Wranmo° '. 1°[ �x0 DolmWar "�cax�ISar. MwE •xp 1 A]r T w.pP la urWpr ZEYYPOe•R[ re•RC CONIR0. LOPE UYdlr6 -rE1D qu r eEVmaN Ia,wr wxmminmx 1mmw 11.064 C5.0 a \ IroFr e \ _ — E ei al L.AANEWAPE E iEDULE 1 6 (5 w.�aaw15 aLRnpT 0 yy( q @I<£ E xr. W M, p!9 p > a �, a.aue.Nel.° eu� . uxm.. syv.• z3- Rx eee •2- aI, aea . T IEpy1REp TREES: PpONOm TREES: 5S OWINUENT& (c2' BB) I.S ] e0R WI�IWGIT>OY (2.5•Bea) IS Rx 1. u K w Iv srliwe^. x� .rvR.eFUC xrov.xcrA xrs.w« .srtmr.. 'aww' w.xr wvR® camas flmPx e.b Cwro.eu' xr• wxr. xr. mrt. xr. mE. ; m — m 'O — m R J) M d W L 41lw0m 6P9S saw. Iwn+'x 'wsm.e .Mbu expb.m V..av S� JRWOR 'Smele' 9imROx 1'Ex M, rbR. a airt. • a]. OM � m 5. n m TaWx� ew Nosr. b• W. aM 1 na.. awr. : R u m m 'wW .Lae. meals 1 ai, meE. IOTN. TIFFS ON 511E 69 w a se.. weaMa NM'�ilOIE 1ma xmm c.�a.• I cv_ wrE. '. im ma+ ww mrm aw ro caom.wrt .rsrwwv. mx raanx Ia II >. �. -: :2: -'i li/SS Ex..RR: oworsEm >bo.eaa M.a1s1. Tmo R� xma ter' 1 aF.. m.r. I d_ axR. I c� mn. IoN_mw. •ve. a....+ s.r. ��� 65TH STREET WEST 6-Q Y-fH 500 _EL 0[901AUS _ - , 1r Rol ro POLY IixlSm alm IZ/aliEY ! \::'� Z�` � ,. •�,a._eu �— -- - -� _ I FGwx ] bq orwr tM1 Tm q.n. �RaTb .. ..wrl d erp,w er ii .. %iir FivEp FuxiaM u'M1eFmruR uWr�M �Ca aI Ib Sf.,. ALLIANT ENGINEEEWG, INC. 21>FAEEAV SOUTH, 8NTE800 lmaWAPOL 4 NN e 6 PHONE (el9 riA®Om FA%ml2)r693099 IeDFIYi OmVpOl1®.T Lri EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA REZONING U .MITTAL 8500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDOM SCKME.SOTA lixwe r.r ml. cin smnm>L 5)nnal� —1 r,N. LANDSCAPE PLAN _i 1st m..r xm 11.064 C6.0 LANDSCAPE REOII�u®!I8 PLANIM NOTEM SALT TOLEiiAPR )_enrssrreaF i r[xun ova+slom Try EEU 1 an TxoJ: on lF x m d a mm Ix._ 7 ' ra :.n um;.m m s_ r rwn w rum l.rm auu x xacx r w.< wwl r wrt wxs PANeT ^ M ATEF r„ A l - nmuswmw s n a aam o m . rum m a amm a . T IEpy1REp TREES: PpONOm TREES: 5S OWINUENT& (c2' BB) I.S ] e0R WI�IWGIT>OY (2.5•Bea) IS mnR.C'IA .0 nuE Ra uuq .0 wNT Wrp..t RncaOaa a ro RrrR� .0 1✓+uce m wuwRn R®imc w R ��r�w�µ..�� we rrra rte.'> d i0i ILQNi (].5'®.) 6 0 'ew mW�v6T.WmR. [ IS t>NAKTT 6I�r3xL td d1➢10 faOlrt 9Wi I. �� RiEEI ImOi IUNIpL9 INL EIaWn (.58.1 s s 52 fLli 1554 13 o a Y> 9wn .A WiE4 9[sYDn a001, ro S ®�i1O® i• arx s ppRx 9. ®Lm N L IurH. alR4N a ®�OOU¢�m Nen6�Ram�C��WwRff �>��a� An.W � Ry fymp wk TREES ]0 41 W O a1 YAp1'W @YLR �ml m s WOAr W aMl MIaS 81 S1wCr1.R6, aC w56m�f. Rny I/RRGV< 06lWLTR rw�s. M.sey�rml.rsagwwaw. pt6TING 1IS6 NDXO PEWlE1EA OF SOE ro NEIUA - 21 xua� W�OI OCORtam�x i Omm 6 OFIa '� I [mie¢�tREd �� s'Sifu Me • ��5'w. Ab.u. .. �•�:\ - IOTN. TIFFS ON 511E 69 6 iiIKP .11 IItaS 4aNTD) NlroR1RNl1 ®S �f If• mm �iWrt u6T4N1a. �WUm m NL WO4YE uSAS Mee ...yea N lew. ` \' '�'� .i \_ i '. im ma+ ww mrm aw ro caom.wrt .rsrwwv. mx raanx Ia ee.e.rn. �. -: :2: -'i vui uaa zf:�"w. 1au�swnrc �� s wxaw,,w�ai r��unar owxNE¢ wi xewl .w . Rxmm um ame o mm avnwu urowsE cmVnw r 1xE '" •ve. a....+ s.r. ��� .� N m wrt a suesTwlxi Rnlx®1� Rv I1�s rm a.WO, v RRUmNEr wmaa .uu wumas �eR r Fn Rxx mEC1n v aRW.W rEimnW .xr w oaimm P+ma m Naxax¢ � m' � cMO.Ia I.R�`�.�rE a9p6wm "O Rm1ort .0 x� � N a° snmxc x016 I. xas uxrs am.x onEm� a Rux a auuinncs w am v ascnwun. 16 r1E wR¢TS R�rauc R®Na n¢ wart ro BERT .xr 11. m^""a.F�Td ro nl0.r � wm ®A nO�M�xmF�iA 5 rm .0 m soa 'umaw °imo'�wa a �"¢ uRrwO6R.ismn � aI w.,.am raw I I. xrmmm.nYO� a mrwlal omd swu a mamxrm mx axmF 0 10 m w scuE w fEEr ] bq orwr tM1 Tm q.n. �RaTb .. ..wrl d erp,w er ii .. %iir FivEp FuxiaM u'M1eFmruR uWr�M �Ca aI Ib Sf.,. ALLIANT ENGINEEEWG, INC. 21>FAEEAV SOUTH, 8NTE800 lmaWAPOL 4 NN e 6 PHONE (el9 riA®Om FA%ml2)r693099 IeDFIYi OmVpOl1®.T Lri EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA REZONING U .MITTAL 8500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDOM SCKME.SOTA lixwe r.r ml. cin smnm>L 5)nnal� —1 r,N. LANDSCAPE PLAN _i 1st m..r xm 11.064 C6.0 ----- - - - - -� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � ' I I I I I I I I I I I I . I � I •------ - - - -'/ MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING ABOVE (NO BASEMENT) I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I -------------------------- - - - - -- IJ PAINMI LEY[L A vAVUxs nvuunOx ftar, O inaq•vlo 4.l Ya,0.x . In:o41'Hm ]pW61P..AVm.IN1v]Gx �0065i1•..fiB. NNIaI4Rm �.]Stv.a.�Vmo•ilasmleNln.l• df1SbW Tow xqulnO/aans• mfnm IYpNep P.nm{• vw.�Nmno: rA,dlnlomm•m.fsersv,srsoo. vasmlman.)• snsl.u. Tots M.PY ft-,• mom P.uvn.vv.Ime• oe...xlnu sysuc�crlvmsap.: MYIL 1• f�• ]pm GSF 41x0]• (6lSOW Y f�00631)• N Wlb Mrdlul OFtra•W,.066F: Vd]n.1/EOGIPaa.l• SOSStlW Tool MpuM0.NN• 5194.0. A5@JI./Ietlry• Mn] /Im4Jbalt l494a4 FWIOIaMO.im,l6 (SF.1/A0.1/40010nC.51• W5o4 Tma A5pe1910.AW. 5Q4.L F.mwP kbv I.Yd 1A.mPln.lu•4Na W IIAtl...m9Ele) Nu l iP.Ael.epm.l m Ilmisun 1w Nnl i wmv Sri Nd....ww Ica sPCnla�.S 1n n.a..®IeLn 7..I.wmmlP.�lalm9 111 nm.mnlul ]a. AuWN sss pndur.m �wwucj n�evr 1Ni me a,.. INN ! m Yo of L b Sl l mlt o% EOAalO EdUrd . A. Fart 1 W XT III VN11/flmmllT lti. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA REZONING Snlpn UBMITTAL l. 8000 FIANCE AVENUE SOUTH ®INN. MINNESOTA snal rma PARKING LEVEL -1 PLAN 11.064 A2.0 lit FLOOR OFFICE P Ills' 1' -0 a �i N l 65TH STREET .WEST J r wWr ry ab. f wNrvtlbnNW rNl fIN Nn or Llm.N A.Nlnal Eduard A. Farr, mu aw• x.. IM62 rr wmmr on.e�r>ea 000 �i i i = LLJ z w .. - -r %10 i w U- i i • > i i N FA*e anma ?Mo. l4 maeWav lWNT WVIINNIYlRW �(\ am41'nm�)Ael4Yr: Wlam.IN1a0a1�45f1 °NSA. �.ner \lt /j�•��°���•1 41 EDINA MEDICAL rm ".m"'•a vney.- mao. PLAZA h lilt wpman.r>na• Ms/,wa.me RE- ZONING r�miam.M,eacss�ymo.1 /l9llmmy. ss>sa SUBMITTAL rms NPNmahr]W loaA] 0000 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH a.PN+rlruror•Mw3 /pu euvaart,r /auawaaa EDNA. WNNESOTA hh41'rm )paocSF V1aaP• IMaaOf m004st •N aw. Nealul ORlm �95A066F. Va10.1 /!9o(Ommnl• 50!!un ThWa4NrttlhrWN• �� I— Far mN a.Omaa.mtlry•.a...1 /��� CITYCITY SUBMITTAL (X /25%2012 naewi anm.]m,memr, Vmo.1/uaolaeem.t• sumn - TaYa.eyLw.aAma• eltlm. r.a.U.1 nrnro �..anlm.Piaa..o.aet ss II.aN.r�l i.mrlamm WL..mI - m pma.rm do N..1 ]R.�w ]a 11MN.wmmp suer rnu " N�a:o�vaaPro mpa�ai.m FIRST FLOOR OFFICE PLAN xdrmtlur .arbwnao^.wwum.mtlmb�N.abwpepre nom— sN.r�r me�wm. .� /awraavQaeP.m.A.�axle%rewmena 11.064 A2.1 UE 1 PAM= - erzer rne• . rb• R R R a q5 1 j B } - e J 4 fp.a[blb. orrV�lpm O.P.rb °l ar fir �r� L� Irmrut Edward A. Farr PAemMU TllBMM M ,r N aeim.e P.rtlR. Peee. 4 W e.afiteaa. IIOYIROiYZYMlQMTAaL - Pror.[r /'\ eeo4l'6m- rAMM-Aem.(Mm3z6010Wn-4.lam {\ —lr�; lrawam. -esm ff ua�•urm(mmg• msdM EDINA MEDICAL raaPywnnae. M— PLAZA .. 0 e m s . rr�dwriAre•.aM4mP.am REZONING elddgib- fie,wmrrf/me.f/!mo(oom,l- urm.m SUBMITTAL Laarb nm aMaearmrz• >m lam 6000 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTM _ � - ` i - a.4Mtl Mrm.e- rAV.alwsiAearpWaaeeemm FNMA. WNNESOTA .. aa4 t• Mmr- �. OmrsrrYlOCO•(mtlOmaemocul•6Llr�. swum oma•e ;eoefilF;ymo. vzseolOxb.l- sosmm - Tad Mq -dMrW, ueeam rem.e For mr. aqua PaW mwzlwedsa% aam f.ITr SLBMIrTAL (LS /2s /�(N2 - rrmeiab.rM,mOrsr: yIDO.yam(mrbq. summ Taa Rqd Wft. carom mmYW ft'a" r \ ! .WllMreP ° a.d aa- f11 pM..mYW.I .9a.r rrra ' - erzer rne• . rb• R R R a q5 1 j B } - e J 4 fp.a[blb. orrV�lpm O.P.rb °l ar fir �r� L� Irmrut Edward A. Farr PAemMU TllBMM M —\ N aeim.e P.rtlR. Peee. 4 W e.afiteaa. IIOYIROiYZYMlQMTAaL - Pror.[r /'\ eeo4l'6m- rAMM-Aem.(Mm3z6010Wn-4.lam {\ —lr�; lrawam. -esm ff ua�•urm(mmg• msdM EDINA MEDICAL raaPywnnae. M— PLAZA .. 0 e m s . rr�dwriAre•.aM4mP.am REZONING elddgib- fie,wmrrf/me.f/!mo(oom,l- urm.m SUBMITTAL Laarb nm aMaearmrz• >m lam 6000 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTM _ � - ` i - a.4Mtl Mrm.e- rAV.alwsiAearpWaaeeemm FNMA. WNNESOTA .. aa4 t• Mmr- �. OmrsrrYlOCO•(mtlOmaemocul•6Llr�. swum oma•e ;eoefilF;ymo. vzseolOxb.l- sosmm - Tad Mq -dMrW, ueeam rem.e For mr. aqua PaW mwzlwedsa% aam f.ITr SLBMIrTAL (LS /2s /�(N2 - rrmeiab.rM,mOrsr: yIDO.yam(mrbq. summ Taa Rqd Wft. carom mmYW ft'a" r \ ! .WllMreP � lmR.a9.h1 91 Qb fi.m..a.( a.d aa- f11 pM..mYW.I .9a.r rrra ' aem la'a0W .A vz A:m. .r�eM SECOND FLOOR OFFICE - 04R(pmrae.® 1nU.e..oueq M.P - rom om.ae ssa arm .eras PLAN Pr. — snMr Mme. IEPa a PANfef. f4hrm arrtlw bpAmerMrmbn.tlnafilM Lmud.ANtlr eahm - . °eeyae..MlblaanPwee6.P ^wwv N®e ww.^° 11.064 A2.2 f NrpWyy or1Up ht IM pW. � fVbflm or Por` W prpprN Iy !bl f� • �N L� Artliltei ugpr !N 4a oI tm a4fp er Mmupta. EEpra A. Farr to ap. N. 16362 h rrr Ilwper Q yen .<n IIDURf D{V0.{t/lh!MTAV. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA RE- ZONING SUBMITTAL rpo�� ONO FIANCE AYME SOUTH ._ EDPIA. MINNESOTA snar n TYPICAL UPPER FLOOR OFFICE PLAN he'eet� SNet�er 11.064 A2.3 %1EEI Tj9 NlL PMIEL CMIOPIES OVER IImtl...E MtEAS \I r nu.e ornfy fNl a- .;.�. a.fvwimr n dun °w:rr�eo °.°my i r av . Ny lN.nne amx.er IN 4a of Ib Sar. of :axara A. Farr Au a., N.. 16362 er Nalueer >m.m�oxr �i FIAVAPI .) F: RR r— - aWUwTw�w. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA RE- ZONING 141BMITTAL 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDLNA. WNNESOTA ROOF OO PLAN 11.064 A4.1 WR \I r nu.e ornfy fNl a- .;.�. a.fvwimr n dun °w:rr�eo °.°my i r av . Ny lN.nne amx.er IN 4a of Ib Sar. of :axara A. Farr Au a., N.. 16362 er Nalueer >m.m�oxr �i FIAVAPI .) F: RR r— - aWUwTw�w. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA RE- ZONING 141BMITTAL 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDLNA. WNNESOTA ROOF OO PLAN 11.064 A4.1 S.1 aCA1D Yr t-0 rnq m.r m. Poo, Mrvr.et� EMN A. Farr X..16362 4.wrnar rAe MAT RrAI c un t Y.F BRILY •f '1 F1r.F PRff1[ a'! S EIfS [PRN[r£ P RRFf.ICT (' A PRIWTF RLGI LLTIYF GI mw I IrJ1T FIYTIN)F P RRFr.LST •1 TA MATCH FALf BRILY 9 FQFLIST .J Tn M1TLN FACE BRICK .J 111 NiFLAST .A in MIT. FALF PR ILY .3 wcrLCT . n M.Tru PRFLISi AfMINlfF 1J W cn MFTN V L TRW4 TI IoonRT . .T r/ Si SL � nlNf. NYttFCC 1r.miRC wT PN cc 17 PRFFIYl- MFTY PANLI A NTN MFTY FFNrx MWNT WYIL{NNIMT FnN Prer.Fr EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA REZONING SUBMITTAL 0000 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDWA, MOMENTA srrrr r, PHASE I NORTH ELEVATIONS WO.erJ Nor Srnr�r 11.064 A5.1 YfF_ w�4N pfYylw INI IM � x 110./ 4 MKI a..xwwnr ail InI1I IY by / Slx. M EEwlOEdeard. A. Farr MWMT WVIIAMMIHTC{I. Pro,.cl EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA RE- ZONING SUBMITTAL 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA. MINNESOTA - III. PHASE i SOUTH ELEVATIONS 11.064 A5.2 �1 X21 PHASE I WEST ELEVATION • WITH TREES Eanra A. fur aF.ua:7Ln[.y�xna:n�o �:�ars3r.T.r�ca :: rsrra:TSi,�arcrrt`'�ns [.uvYE7mr ' °id�l0bl'ft! . srt•Lt��an.rtr.. z`aa *:tcr.� [Ii:T NOT., 7rI�L'L1 Z.�I7�?i[.Ot4 t�-Ir�ctNa>irrnrP. sJi•LL9ti4;19[`7 FJ27�YYISF:fi0R.7{7!: f:L^F.4Fidi`,ft7 �.T. NlF�i1F?IP:7. i3OIfO1TrL`�L;:IiR718.f iiF r•�[rrr M-4.1 liv l`S IiQ:7TLfrSt7:liL7yq : f9 11aUNT tMYN/111flIMT lir. Pro�rcf EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA REZONING SUBMITTAL 8000 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH IDIN& MINNESOTA PHASE I EAST AND WEST ELEVATTIDNS 11.064 A5.3 w ��tb� ar�w.rw or .ryra EOY2Ip,A. Farr 16362 MUUMT II[YfIeNIMMi W. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA RE- ZONING ,%BMITTAL E5OO FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA. MINNESOTA l.,we,er O.1. CITY SUBMITTAL OS /25/2012 Snort rr PHASE II NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS 1,111 A5.4 PHASE II WEST ELEVATION . WITH TREES L1dq;1I.RF.i�ldl�rtCO 1•lF.T�::9GT'Q f•!i$LTlrl, ?:7P,/7�:i�iriii♦ i�r7,Vi, ^, 7iTd.LFir6ifl:/.fi . •trrxacj�art:cr . F17r7xdSii6lfl.fF Y7LTxxlilOF?Silf:67 Yraxrmr.�5rt�irl�a:rrx, n^L� ax;izar runs rr rr' MUUHT O[YNANWMTLW. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA RE- ZONING SUBMITTAL 1.ar�� 8500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA. MINNESOTA n.wa Fe• wr. CITY SUBMITTAL 05/25%2012 sn..r ri PHAE•II ELEVATIONS 11.064 A5.5 WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 & &.v"Iales, Inc. Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763541 -1700 Memorandum DATE: I Tune 20, 2012 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Wayne Houle, Public Works Director City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E, PTOE RE. Revised Edina Medical Plaza — 6500 France Avenue Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -29 Background Traffic and Parking Studies were completed in April 2012 documenting the anticipated traffic impacts the proposed redevelopment of the 6500 France Avenue site would have on the adjacent roadway system. The site and proposed redevelopment has now been expanded to include the 400565 th Avenue site located to the west of 6500 France Avenue. This memorandum provides an updated review of the traffic impacts, based on the revised site plan and development proposal. Access to the existing sites is currently provided at two (2) full movement driveway locations from 65th Street to each property (four driveways). The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed site redevelopment includes reconstruction of both the 6500 France Avenue site and the 4005 65th Avenue . site .to provide a six story 102,406 sf (96,500 sf leasable) medical office building with an attached 5 story parking structure. The primary uses in the building will include 90% medical office and 10% medical related retail. It is proposed that the development will be constructed in,phases. The first phase will include 4 stories of the medical office building and 3 stories of the parking structure. The traffic analysis included in this study evaluated the ultimate build of the, site as a worst case, condition. The parking demand includes an analysis of both phase 1 and the ultimate development scenario. All access to the new development site will be provided from two full movement access locations on 65th Street and one right -out access location to France Avenue. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and anticipated development were evaluated at the site access locations as well as the primary ,impacted intersections and driveway_ along 65th Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road. The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. k6q Revised Edina Medical Plaza Traffic Study City of Edina June 20, 2012 Page 2 of 9 Existing Traffic Characteristics The existing lane configuration and traffic control include: 65th Street is an east -west city street with numerous access driveways. The existing roadway configuration includes a single lane in each direction with a continuous center left turn lane (three lane section). All the driveway access points are controlled with stop signs, stopping the exiting movements from the developments. The two primary intersections along the 65th Street corridor are at France Avenue and Valley View Road. Both France Avenue and Valley View Road are classified as "A" Minor Arterials providing regional access to the area. Both intersections are controlled with Traffic Control Signals. The lane configurations at each are as follows. 65th Street at France Avenue SB France Ave approaching 65th St — one through/right, two through, one left NB France Ave approaching 65th St — one through/right, two through, one left EB 65th St approaching France Ave — one through/right, one left WB 65th St approaching France Ave — one right, one through/left 65th Street/TH 62 off ramp at Valley View Road SB Valley View Rd approaching 65th St — one through, one left NB Valley View Rd approaching 6501 St — one through/right, two through EB TH 62 off ramp approaching Valley View Rd — one free right, one through/left WB 65th St approaching Valley View Rd — one right/left AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts were conducted along 65th Street at each access driveway, the intersection of France Avenue at 65th Street and the intersection of Valley View Road at 65th Street/TH 62 off ramp the week of February 20th, 2012. Figure 3 shows the intersections and driveways along the corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study and, Figure 4 shows the existing 2012 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with the existing lane configuration. The traffic count data is included in the Appendix. Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed ultimate redevelopment is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation rates used to estimate the proposed site traffic are based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The table shows the total daily, AM peak hour and PM. peak hour trip generation for the proposed site. It was also assumed that the makeup of the development will be services that complement the primary proposed medical office use, such as the coffee shop, barber shop and medical supply uses. For this reason, the development traffic generation was adjusted for internal dual purpose trips. It was also assumed that all the traffic from the site would be new traffic to the roadway system and no pass -by /diverted trip factors were considered. h ZG Revised Edina Medical Plaza Traffic Study City of Edina June 20, 2012 Page 3 of 9 Table 1- Estimated Site Trip Generation Use Size ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Coffee Shop 1.20 492 246 246 141 72 69 49 24 24 Barber Shop 1.00 22 11 11 1 1 0 1 0 1 Audiology 3.50 126 63 63 8 6 2 12 3 9 Medical Goods 4.00 360 180 180 13 8 5 34 17 17 Medical Office 86.80 3136 1568 1568 200 158 42 300 81 219 Dual Purpose Trip Reduction 910 455 455 11 7 4 91 29 62 Total New Trips 3227 1613 1613 352 237 114 305 97 208 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition Background Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed development will occur between existing conditions and any given future year due to other growth and development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts on in the area traffic has stayed constant or dropped in the past few years. In order to account for some background growth in traffic a .05% per year factor was applied to the through traffic on 65th Street, France Avenue and Valley View Road. Trip Distribution Site - generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on the population distribution relative to the site and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve it. The Trip Distribution was assumed as follows: 25% north on France Avenue 20% south on France Avenue 10% from the Hospital across France Avenue 10% north on Valley View Road 5% south on Valley View Road 30% from west on TH 62 A -7( Revised Edina Medical Plaza Traffic Study City of Edina June 20, 2012 Page 4 of 9 Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2014, which is the year after the proposed site would be fully developed. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic to the existing 2012 traffic counts then adding the anticipated site traffic to the system based on the traffic distribution outlined above. Figure S shows the projected 2014 AM and PM peak hour traffic volume. Traffic Operations Existing and/or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the intersections of 65a' Street at France Avenue, 65a' Street at Valley View Road, the existing driveways on 65h Street, the proposed development site driveways on 65u' Street and the right -out only site access to France Avenue. This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations. Analysis Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign - controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through- street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un- signalized intersections are shown in Table 2. The threshold LOS values for un- signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. A -73, Revised Edina Medical Plaza Traffic Study City of Edina June 20, 2012 Page 5 of 9 Table 2 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low - volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. 47.3 Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un- Signalized A < 10 < < -10 B 10 -20 10 -15 C 20 -35 15 -25 D 35 — 55 25-35 E 55-80 35-50 F >80 >50 Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low - volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. 47.3 Revised Edina Medical Plaza Traffic Study City of Edina June 20, 2012 Page 6 of 9 Existing Level of Service Summary Table 3, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the two primary intersections on 65�' Street as well as the existing site driveways and adjacent development driveway based on the current lane geometry and traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operation at LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours with all movements operating at LOS D or better. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. Table 3 - Existing Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the area for 2014 which represents the year after the proposed redevelopment is planned for completion. The results of the analysis are shown below in Table 4. All of the intersections are expected to continue to operate at similar levels of service after the redevelopment as prior to the redevelopment. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. . Table 4 — Full Build (2014) Redevelopment Level of Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Delay Delay (sec/veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) 65th Street at France Ave C (D) 24 B (D) 17 65'' Street at Valley View Rd B (D) 13 B (D) 11 65 Street at 6500 Site A (A) 1 A (B) 1 Driveway 65 Street at East Site A(C) 65 Street at 4005 Site A (A) 1 A (A) 2 Driveway France Ave at Right -out Site A (A) 65 Street at Adjacent A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Development Driveways 65 Street at Adjacent A (B) C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the area for 2014 which represents the year after the proposed redevelopment is planned for completion. The results of the analysis are shown below in Table 4. All of the intersections are expected to continue to operate at similar levels of service after the redevelopment as prior to the redevelopment. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. . Table 4 — Full Build (2014) Redevelopment Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. A,t AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Delay LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec /veh) 650' Street at France Ave C (D) 25 C (D) 20 65'h Street at Valley View Rd B (D) 15 B (D) 16 65 th Street at West Site A (B) 2 A (B) 4 Driveway 65 Street at East Site A(C) 3 A (C) 4 Driveway France Ave at Right -out Site A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Driveway 65 Street at Adjacent A (B) 2 A (B) 2 Development Driveways C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. A,t Revised Edina Medical Plaza Traffic Study City of Edina June 20, 2012 Page 7 of 9 In addition the study area analysis, the anticipated site traffic was added to the City's Southeast Area Transportation Model to determine if any regional impacts would occur with the proposed redevelopment. The projected traffic was distributed to the regional roadway system and no additional traffic operation issues were identified as a result of this proposed development. Vehicle Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis forboth the existing and future 2014 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at the driveways and intersections on 65th Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing and future 2014 conditions, the average queues in the corridor do not exceed any of the available turn lanes storage. In some cases'however, the maximum queues were exceeded. The ,maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were identified just one time during the peak periods With an extremely short duration of less than 2 seconds. In most cases the queues exceed the storage in the continuous left turn lane, therefore only blocking the adjacent driveway and not impacting through traffic. Based on the analysis none of the anticipated average queues or maximum queues on 65th Street will back up or block either the France Ave or the Site Access intersections. Tables showing the average and maximum queue lengths by movement and approach are included in the Appendix. . Parking Demand The parking demand for the proposed development was analyzed based on proposed uses on the site `for phase 1 and the ultimate development of the site. The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was.based on surveys of the.; parking. generation for other similar land uses as, documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4`4 Edition. Table S below shows a summary of each potential uses, the estimated parking generation rate and what the anticipated peak parking demand would be for a typical weekday. This would represent the worst case condition for the parking on the site assuming the proposed uses. The current City Code would require a total of 382 parking spaces for phase 1 and 563 parking spaces for the proposed ultimate development. Currently the proposed site includes 306 spaces in a three (3) level parking ramp with the phase 1 initial development. Additional "proof of parking" of 234 spaces is proposed by adding two (2) levels to the parking ramp with the full build out of the site'. The ultimate total parking available would be 540 parking spaces. Reviewing the ITE Parking Generation summary in Table S, sufficient spaces would be available for the anticipated site parking demand for phase I and full build out of the site with the additional two parking levels. A76- Revised Edina Medical Plaza Traffic Study City of Edina June 20, 2012 Page 8 of 9 Table 5 – Site Parking Demand Use Size Rate Spaces Phase 1 - - - - -- Medical Office _ 58,950 sf 4.27 spaces/ksf 252 _ Medical Retail 6,550 sf 5.40 s aces/ksf 36 Total Phase 1 -- 288 Full Build --------------- - - - - -- Medical Office_ ------ - - - - -- 86,850 sf ----------- - - - - -- 4.27 spaces/ksf -- - - - - -- — 371 Medical Retail 1 9,650 sf 5.40 s aces/ksf 53 Total Full Build 424 In addition parking the parking demand was also analyzed for a mix of medical office and general retail or 100% medical office on the site assuming the ultimate build out of the development. Table 6 shows a summary of the potential alternative uses and what the anticipated parking demand would be for each on a typical weekday. Table 6 –Alternative Use Parking Demand Use Size Rate Spaces Alternative 1 - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - -- _ Medical Office— General Retail - - -- 86,850 sf 9,650 sf - - - - -- 4.27 spaces/ksf 3.16 s aces/ksf - _ _ 371 31 Total Alternative 1 402 Alternative 2 -- - - - - -- - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Medical Office ------------------------------ - - - - -- Bank -- - - - - -- 86,850 sf -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 9,650 sf ------ - - - - 4.27 spaces/ksf _ --- - - - - -- - 5.67 s aces/ksf -- 371 --------------- - - -- 55 Total Alternative 2 426 A_ lternative 3 _ Medical Office 96,500 sf 4.27 s aces /ksf 413 Total Alternative 3 1 1 413 The results of the parking analysis conclude that the parking proposed with the site plan would be adequate for any mix of medical office and general retail uses on the site, for both phase 1 development and the ultimate planned 540 parking spaces and proposed building size. A74 Revised Edina Medical Plaza Traffic Study City of Edina June 20, 2012 Page 9 of 9 Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: ■ The proposed site redevelopment is proposed to constructed in two phases and include primarily medical office and supporting uses. The ultimate full build of the site is anticipated to generate 3227 trips in a day, 352 trips in the AM peak hour and 305 trips in the PM peak hour. ■ Traffic operations at the intersections and driveway on 65`h Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road will remain the same with or without the proposed ultimate site development. ■ Traffic operations at the proposed site driveways will operate at overall LOS A in the AM and PM peak hours with the worst movement operating at a LOS C. ■ The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact to the adjacent driveways or intersections will occur as a result of the proposed ultimate site development.. ■ Although the available parking does not meet the City's Code, based on ITE parking generation estimates the phase I development parking of 306 spaces and ultimate . development parking of 540 spaces will be adequate for the anticipated site parking demand. Based on these conclusions no additional improvements other than those shown on the site plan . would be required to accommodate the proposed site redevelopment. 47-7 m 4 T w,R C7Nl A a I FW a > CH k Q�CU d- 62 W. 62 nd T. J nd ST. O� w x o J Cr w a a z �pRR1 SON w o>� � w T. U I \ V c� 35 Lq > a a a m _ o roo f+ 1400 ++ `uj 3 ° 35. > > > U J w 0_ > L11 Li x J V) ~ m 64 th ST. c a ST. > 64 th ST. a IOTA W o } W. 6411 a a a > a t W. 0 3 0 0 U. W. z o 65 th ST. a dO ssth ST. H J Z O Z -j C7 U 3 FsT. w Z Q W 'n w Lake J o ST. a z W. 66th a e a a o0 000 0 i Cr a Cornelia • Project SOUTHD�a ALE F. r Z Gy w CIR. N Location <��° o�F� LpO�O� 68 th ST a 0 m ROYCAR ALFANZ � Q' ° TON UPPER B RD. ?�� fit. a a �P W TER• o JUDS o �,� �Zq 69th I,\u v� �°� L z UQ� �� W. 69th ST. L—� 0 () WAY a z 3 w �� Q Q o0000o c� 38. ST. O(/NeERRY u ° Lq.a ¢ Q G W. 3 70th o > a w ST. LAL a�� LAR ( =ANDOVER RD. a MAVELL E w'' Jm J N <� SA V) � Z�ao AS p Gp C BE L VIDERE Lq 0 w v� o qsr L4RFM J ' o DR' HAZELTON RD• 9 r w r Y w Cr a T Rj�( !q ASPASIA O R CIRC Z4 (� ° w m a o x tic N fGM < CIR. ~ UNy4M pUN ORF W. " = 72 nd ST. w pR HgMRO z /� X o a O Creed HIBISCUS 3 -.J FLLSWORTH °� DR. w v �Iq�(Z AVE, a = J a lon I DR. w v~ w_ OR a > PHLOX 3 Ld w Z of 0 GILFORD DR. 3, o 0 z w CO LA. a w0 o a ¢ vo HIBISCUS > Y > J a `` CT' o ST. ST. Lake AVE. a o a �' PARKLAWN o AVE. o Edina o SEOUM o �Py1� o W. 75th QOPPY ORE w eP PLAZA r r °u LA. Y G DR. a a W. 76th 3 ST. U Z Ln 3 C) w BLVD. a W. Y Cr w y Q 0 x —�� 77th ST. a 1 0 a ° MINNESOTA DR, — h VIKING w DR. D � ° r 0 T V Traffic Impact Study Figure 1 e 1 Revised Edina Medical Plaza (6500 France Avenue) 0 City of Edina, Minnesota Project Location Map f }7� w� Dote: Printed: 61181202 W58 Fllename: K: \0 1686- 290\Cad\Exhibitsv686 -29 fic -02 - Site Plan.dan FS HOSATAI PARKING RAIAP i _ -' a _ N APARp L �. Om MR L.i. .... ..�. RIG: IURN POM OF FRANCE RONNT OF FRANCE POND LOADING ZONE DELIVERY VEKLE PARKING Site Plan CoouI\�G 6500 Fimce Avenue TOWER, M,y,5.2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC Traffic Impact Study Figure 2 oe - Revised Edina Medical Plaza (6500 France Avenue) City of Edina, Minnesota Proposed Site Plan f ... Il.wanme •r T . On 11rr _ fit 2 3 sgth S 4Rfi eta 5 6 7 8 9 ci> VA ° 41 Traffic Impact Study e T Revised Edina Medical Office Plaza (6500 France Avenue) •,�, �• y of Edina. Minnesota A LJ�B Figure 3 Intersection Lc ion Map N � 85 ( 253) O c7 .O 0 0 0( 0) N j t. 8 ( 20) ( 42) 39 t 1 ( 72) 272 1► o M o � ( 232) 489 60 ( 11) N tO 82 ( 228) A► r 2 ( 1) ( 8) 53 - (147) 308 o 0 .7, 139 ( 11) O � o N 117 (155) •� r 0 ( 5) ( 3) 76 -0 Wf ( 209) 255 o 0 ua o .n ( 5) 9 v v O O O O o o 260 (167) r 5 ( 0) (0)0 0 0 0 (324)282 P o^ O^ ( 1) 2 v / 'n t 216 ( 372) N o N 63 ( 95) "� 11 4 61( 50) (131) 77 1 1 1 ( 84) 168 (109) 38 - 41 dr fN _ r tin 65th ;# street � � • ' t 5 6 7 8 IV. Af 2( 1) U(209)332 0) 0( 0) 0( O) c o 0 0 a 4L 93 ( 270) ( 236) o 0 o 255 (166) 0 0 o r 265 (166) AL 0( 0) 5) r 5( 2) 0( 0) LEGEND 1)0 (0)0 'Y' (o)(154) 361 o (319) 280 ^ o e ( 324) 282 V 0 0 m .n o AM (PM) Peak -- -- -- — — -- -- XXX (XXX) Hour Turning o) o (1) 2 (o) o - Movements O ! °\SA�Mtir. g Traffic Impact Study Figure 4 �e Revised Edina Medical Office Plaza (6500 France Avenue) City of Edina, Minnesota Existing Peak Hour Turning Movements N M1 140 ( 352) o rn D 0( 0) N 1 i► 18 ( 32) ( 42) 39 t t O � � (154) 319 0 0 � M ( 232) 489 -% 60 ( 11) N iD O tD o N 147 ( 339) it 2 ( 1) ( 8) 53 - O O (263)377 0 0 139 ( 11) N p � o N 157 ( 216) er 55 ( 24) ( 3) 76 -r N O N (273) 299 0 ( 57) 34 0 ( 0) O O O 0 0 0 351(251) 0 ( 0) ( 0) 0 0 0 0 ( 412) 345 0 0 0 ( 0) 0 O ^ O L 216(372) u9 v u'Y T N 4r 88 (110) J2 L N _+ 11 L 61(50x) (175)104 -$ Vj t t r+ OJ M (105)184 -r (110) 50 v vt 4F - r A s: ' iRIcIfar I 65th Street , , �tlM++fn► !�M J �1i�l�J.. .:�� 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( 0) O O O 0 0 0 4' 351 (251) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 (196) Pr 61(24) ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 "1 U o 0 (412)345 o 0 0 (356)318 � v M ( O) 0 _ ( 56) 27 .y _ - w$e Figure 5 2014 Peak Hour Turning V -vements 2 ( 1) 158 (381) 0 ( 0) 1) 0 LEGEND L-V ( 270) 430 ^ O AM (PM) Peak 0j 0 ` - XXX (XXX) Hour Turning Movements w° A Traffic Impact Study �e 1 /Y °evised Edina Medical Office Plaza (6500 France Avenue) ��•�, �� y of Edina, Minnesota 0 ( 0) O O O 0 0 0 4' 351 (251) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 (196) Pr 61(24) ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 "1 U o 0 (412)345 o 0 0 (356)318 � v M ( O) 0 _ ( 56) 27 .y _ - w$e Figure 5 2014 Peak Hour Turning V -vements W 2012 AM Intersection Total Delay by Level of Se rvice LOS by Approach LOS by Intersection Average & Maximum Traffic Quouein fee Appr SevWeh) by Movement (S0c/Veh) Appr Left-Tum Through Right-Turn c Location L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Ave Max Storage Are Max Ave Max Storage 0 Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue o m NB 0 10 2 A B A 9 A NB 18 63 WB 31 0 4 C A A 7 A WB 24 94 ~ 1: 65th Street 8 Valley View Rd 13 B SB 42 7 0 D A A 13 B SB 45 102 150 71 172 o, e) EB 32 31 1 4 C C I A 15 B EB 168 414 d N NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB WB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A WB 2: 65th Street & Bank DW 2 A SB 6 0 0 A A A 6 A SB 2 30 a w EB 0 3 0 A A A 3 A EB 12 c d N NB 0 0 3 A A A 3 A NB 2 28 WB 3 1 0 A A A 1 A WB 10 25 3 3: 65th Street & Crosstown Medical 1 A H Ramp SB 6 0 3 A A A 5 A SB 22 54 EB 2 1 0 A A A 1 A EB 6 27 25 1 20 c d N NB 9 0 5 A A A 7 A NB 14 32 WB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A WB 4: 65th Street & Condo Garage 1 A u, e SB 8 0 0 A A A 8 A SB 2 28 EB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A EB d N NB 0 0 8 A A A 8 A NB 1 17 WB 0 1 0 A A A 0 A WB 6 a 5: 65th Street & Fairview Ramp 1 A SB 8 0 3 A A A 6 A SB 22 54 a C EB 3 1 0 A A A 1 A EB 11 43 25 m N NS 0 0 3 A A A 3 A NB 3 29 WB 3 1 0 A A A 1 A WB 2 24 25 e 6: 65th Streat & 4005 - East DW 1 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB rn a EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A EB 6 c a N NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB WB 3 0 0 A A A 0 A WB 2 25 25 7: 65th Street & 6500 - West DW 0 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB E c EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A ES 1 16 d N NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB 6 WB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A WB Or, 65th Street & 6500 - East DW 1 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB a c EB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A EB 9 95 a d NB 43 23 12 D C B 24 C NB 67 145 160 98 186 WB 45 41 2 D D A 17 B WB 85 182 N 9: 65th Street & France Ave 24 C SB 47 16 15 D B B 23 C SB 139 210 160 83 213 rn e) EB 38 37 25 D D C 36 D EB 53 111 75 121 192 s 2014 AM - REVISED Intersection Total Delay by Movement Level of Service by Movement LOS by Approach LOS by Intersection Average & Maximum Traffic Qusuein feet Left-Turn Through Right -Turn Appr (Sec/Veh) (Sec/Veh) (Sec/Veh) Appr Location v Ave Max Ave Max Ave Max L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Queue Queue Storage Queue Queue Queue Queue Storage NB 0 14 4 A B A 13 B NB 24 73 WB 35 0 7 D A A 10 B WB 40 137 N 1: 65th Street& Valley View. Rd 15 B 0) SB 42 10 0 D B A 16 B SB 52 127 150 81 193 re EB 33 30 5 C C A 16 B EB 189 474 d NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB WB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A WB 4 N e 2: 65th Street & Bank DW 1 A SB 6 0 0 A A A 6 A SB 1 18 m EB 0 2 0 A A A 2 A EB 1 30 e y NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB 10 WB 2 1 0 A A A 1 A WB 10 25 N a 3: 65th Street & Crosstown Medical 1 A SB 6 0 3 A A A 5 A SB 22 48 a Ramp EB 3 1 0 A A A 1 A EB 9 28 25 1 10 C d NB 8 0 6 A A A 7 A NB 12 32 WB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A WB N C 4: 65th Street & Condo Garage 1 A H SB 7 0 0 A A A 7 A SB 2 17 EB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A EB 2 e NB 11 0 5 B A A 8 A NB 16 41 15 44 WB 4 2 1 A A A 2 A WB 13 47 100 2 22 N m c 5: 65th Street & Fairview Ramp 2 A U$ SB 11 0 4 B A A 9 A SB 24 59 EB 3 1 0 A A A 1 A EB 13 59 25 3 c d N NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB WB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A WB #NIA 0 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A EB c d NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB N c #WA WB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A 0 A WB SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A EB m N 15 C A C 16 C NB 22 54 15 52 0 A A A 2 A WB 21 79 50 C 8: 65th Street 8 6500 -East DW 3 A 0 A A A 0 A SB M [NB44 1 A A A 3 A EB 14 118 1 30 75 c o 11 D C B 25 C NB 90 185 160 97 195 2 D D A 17 B WB 99 199 A 9: 65th Street & France Ave 25 C 18 D B B 25 C SB 135 210 160 105 282 rn 24 D D C 34 C EB 63 100 75 137 190 2012 PM Intersection Total Delay by Level of Service LOS by LOS by Average & Maximum Traffic Queuein feet �c Appr Movement by Movement Approach Intersection Left -Tum Through Right-Turn Location (See/Veh) (Sec/Veh) (SeWeh APp r Ace Max Are Max Ave Max L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Queue Queue Storage Queue Queue Queue Queue Storage v NB 0 9 4 A A A 9 A NB 49 137 WB 36 0 12 D A B 14 B WB 88 193 N C 1. 65th Street & Valley View Rd 11 B SB 42 6 0 D A A 12 B SB 44 114 150 66 173 rn U) EB 36 35 2 D D A 13 B EB 66 153 N NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB WB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A WB 2 29 e 2: 66th Street & Bank DW 1 A SB 0 0 5 A A A 5 A SB 3 18 Im EB 6 2 0 A A A 2 A EB 1 17 60 2 38 C $, N NB 5 0 0 A A A 5 A NB 1 23 WB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A WB 5 25 M 3: 65th Street S Crosstown Medical 1 A SB 6 0 4 A A A 5 A SB 37 65 a Ramp EB 2 0 0 A A A 0 A EB 1 26 25 c $, N NB 6 0 3 A A A 4 A NB 8 31 WB 2 0 0 A A A 0 A WB 12 25 To C 4: 65th Street S Condo Garage 0 A W SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A FB c d N NB 6 0" 5 A A A 6 A NB 8 28 W B 3 0 0 A A A 0 A WB 4 23 25 2 27 io e 5: 65th Street &Fairview Ramp 2 A o�i SB 8 0 5 A A A 7 A SB 48 102 EB 1 0 0 A A A 0 A EB c d N NB 9 0 3 A A A 6 A NB 8 37 WB 2 0 0 A A A 0 A WB 1 18 25 1 17 6: 65th Street & 4005 - East DW 0 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB w EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A EB 1 7 c $ N NB 9 0 0 A A A 9 A NB 1 12 WB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A WB e 7: 65th Street & 6500 - West DW 0 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB obi EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A EB c ° N NB 12 0 0 B A A 12 B NB 1 24 WB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A WB e 8: 65th Street & 6500 - East DW 1 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB rn m EB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A EB 2 34 e o NB 46 18 12 D B B 18 B NB 33 92 160 138 264 WB 39 35 4 D D A 13 B WB 88 206 21 188 N A 9: 65th Street & France Ave 17 B SB 51 12 11 D B B 16 B SB 60 136 160 67 143 C ?+ N EB 33 28 15 C C B 25 C EB 70 111 75 98 186 2014 PM - REVISED Intersection Total Delay by Level of Service LOS by LOS by Average & Maximum Traffic Queuein feet APP Movement by Movement Approach Intersection Left-Turn Through Right -Turn e Location r (SeWeh) (See/Veh) (See/Veh) Appr V Are Max Are Max Are Max L T R L T R Delay LOS Delay LOS Queue Queue Storage Queue Queue Queue Queue Storage o NB 0 16 8 A B A 16 B NB 75 178 WB 34 0 17 C A B 19 B WB 131 208 N 1. 66th Street & Valley View Rd 16 B SB 43 9 0 D A A 16 B I SB 63 149 150 86 224 e) EB 27 27 1 2 C C A 13 B EB 97 205 y N NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB WB 0 2 0 A A A 2 A WB 13 117 e 2: 65th Street & Bank DW 2 A SB 0 0 21 A A C 21 C SB 6 43 rn in EB 0 2 0 A A A 2 A EB 8 60 12 c d N NB 12 0 0 B A A 12 B NB 1 23 WB 0 1 1 A A A 1 A WB 3 75 M 3: 65th Street & Crosstown Medical 2 A Ramp SB 11 0 6 B A A 9 A SB 40 88 EB 5 0 0 A A A 0 A EB 3 26 25 C S N NB 6 0 5 A A A 5 A Na 10 33 WB 2 0 0 A A A 0 A WB 1 16 25 3 To rn 4: 66th Street & Condo Garage 1 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB w EB 0 1 0 A A A 1 A EB C $ N NB 10 0 5 B A A 8 A NS 28 63 20 43 WB 4 1 0 A A A 1 A WB 7 32 100 m 6: 65th Street & Fairview Ramp 4 A SB 12 0 7 B A A 10 A SS 54 122 a EB 3 1 0 A A A 1 A EB 1 17 25 2 c d N NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB WB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A WB M #WA 0 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB rn a EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A EB c d N NB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A NB WB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A WB #N/A 0 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB rn m EB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A EB d N NB 18 0 18 C A C 18 C NB 32 85 23 70 WB 11 1 0 B A A 2 A WB 11 49 50 e 8: 65th Street & 6500 - East DW 4 A SB 0 0 0 A A A 0 A SB rn w EB 0 2 1 A A A 2 A EB 14 134 10 75 c NB 45 20 12 D C B 21 C NB 49 153 160 139 266 WB 35 39 3 D D A 13 B WB 97 216 16 167 N 9: 65th Street & France Ave 20 C SB 50 15 11 D B B 18 B SB 58 133 160 75 144 c N EB 34 27 15 C C B 1 27 C EB 83 100 75 120 190 Valley View Rd & W 65th St (ramp) 6:30- 9:30 -am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN sunny, 30's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name valley view rd & w 65th st-eb ramp Site Code :00000004 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page .No : 1 07:00 AM 0 38 13 0 51 7 0 1 0 8 07:15 AM 0 73 11 0 :84 14' 0 0 0 14 07:30 AM 0 : 80 19. 0 99' 27 0 1 0 28 07:45 AM 0 81 _20 0 101 16 0 2 0 18 Total 0 272 63 0 335 64 0 4 0 68 08:00 AM 0 55 10 0 65 18 0 2 0 20 08:16 AM - 6. 77 15 0 92 24 0 3 0 27 08 :30 AM . O 61 17 0 78 28 0 1 0 29 08:45 AM 0, 39 14 6 53 14 0 1 0 15 Total 0 232 56 0 288 84 0 7 0 91 09:00 AM 0 60 8 0 68 28 0 1 0 29 09:15 AM I 0 48 10 0 58 I 21 0 3 0 24 Total 0 108 18 0 1261 49 0 4 0 53 03:30 PM 1 0 72 11 0 831 70 0 6 0 76 03:45 PM 0 69 4 0 73 59 0 2 0 61 Total 0 141 15 0 1661 129 0 8 0 137 04:00 PM 0 55 14 0 69 68 0 8 0 76 04:15 PM 0 52 13 0 65 38 0 3 0 41 04:30 PM 0 74 11 0 85 75 0 1 0 76 04:45 PM 0 75 11 0. 86 48 0 9 0 57 Total 0 256 49 0 305 229 0 21 0 250 05:00 PM 0 82 10 0 92 65 0 5 0 70 05:15 PM 0 90 12 0 102 41 0 3 0 44 05:30_ PM 0 77 13 0 90 39 0 3 0 42 05:45 PM. 0 90 11 0 101 30 0 1 0 31 Total 0 339 46 0' 388 175 0 12 0 187 06:00 PM 0 56 6 0 62 31 0 2 0 33 06:15 PM 0 55 7 0 .62 22 0 1 0 23 Grand Total 0 1497 276 0 1773 791 0 60 0 851 Apprch %q 0 84.4 15.6 0 92.9 0 7.1 0 Total % 0 17.1 3.2 0 20.3 9.1, 0 0.7 0 9.7 4 53 0 0 57 50 72 10 80 0 0 90 89 66 13 91 0 0 104 105 56 4 8T 0 0 .91 .123 80 31' 311 0 0 342 367 274 3 93 0 0 96 141 83 8 86 0 0 94 120 63 10 68 0 0 78 101 56 7 60 0 0 67 131 50 28 307 0 0 335 493 252 9 80 0 0 89 110 37 3 55 0 0 58 103 46 12 135 0 0 1471 213 83 1 145 0 0 1461 90 34 1 158. 0 0 159 81 25 2 303 0 0 3051 171 59 5 159 0 0 164, 81 24 4' 158 0 0 162 72 19 2 194 0 0 196 62 14 2' 163 0 0 165 71 10 13 674 0 0 687 286 67 7 224 0 0 231 52 14 1 204 0 0 205 47 10 2 146 0 0 148 43 8 4 160 0 0 164 78 1.1 14 734 0 0 748 220' 43 2 137 0 0 139 68 11 2' 116 0 0 118 74 8 117 2778 0 0 2895 2013 940 4 96 0 0 62.6 29.2 1.3 31.8 0 0 33.1 23 10.8 10 0 132 248 10' 0 165 353 11 0 172 403 4 0 267 417 35 0 676 1421 10 0 234 415 14 6 197 410 10 0 167 352 14 0 195 330 48 0 793 1507 12 0 159 345 16 0 1651 305 28 0 3241 650 12 0 136 441 16 0 122 415 28 0 2581 856 16 0 121 430 15 0. 106 374 12 0 88 445 11 0 92 400 .54 0 407 1649 7 0 73 466 12 0 69 420 9 0 60 340 7 0 96 392. 35 0 298' 1618 13 0 92 326 17 0 99 302 264 0 3217 8736 8.2 0 3 0 36.8 Valley View Rd W 65th St Valley View Rd TH 62 off ramp from North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App Tom Right Thar F Left [_P.—!d.T4.Tw Rlght ThrU I Left Peds np ram Right Thrtr I Left I Peds_ App. ram IntTotal 06:30 AM 0 15 8 0 23 3 0 0 0 3 5 27 0 0 32 43 73 1 0 117 175 06:45 AM 0 23 8 0 31 5 0 1 0 .6 8 34 0 0 . 42 78 70 5 0 153 232 Total 0 38 16 0 54 8 0 1 0 9 13 61 0 0 74 121_ 143 6 0 270 407 07:00 AM 0 38 13 0 51 7 0 1 0 8 07:15 AM 0 73 11 0 :84 14' 0 0 0 14 07:30 AM 0 : 80 19. 0 99' 27 0 1 0 28 07:45 AM 0 81 _20 0 101 16 0 2 0 18 Total 0 272 63 0 335 64 0 4 0 68 08:00 AM 0 55 10 0 65 18 0 2 0 20 08:16 AM - 6. 77 15 0 92 24 0 3 0 27 08 :30 AM . O 61 17 0 78 28 0 1 0 29 08:45 AM 0, 39 14 6 53 14 0 1 0 15 Total 0 232 56 0 288 84 0 7 0 91 09:00 AM 0 60 8 0 68 28 0 1 0 29 09:15 AM I 0 48 10 0 58 I 21 0 3 0 24 Total 0 108 18 0 1261 49 0 4 0 53 03:30 PM 1 0 72 11 0 831 70 0 6 0 76 03:45 PM 0 69 4 0 73 59 0 2 0 61 Total 0 141 15 0 1661 129 0 8 0 137 04:00 PM 0 55 14 0 69 68 0 8 0 76 04:15 PM 0 52 13 0 65 38 0 3 0 41 04:30 PM 0 74 11 0 85 75 0 1 0 76 04:45 PM 0 75 11 0. 86 48 0 9 0 57 Total 0 256 49 0 305 229 0 21 0 250 05:00 PM 0 82 10 0 92 65 0 5 0 70 05:15 PM 0 90 12 0 102 41 0 3 0 44 05:30_ PM 0 77 13 0 90 39 0 3 0 42 05:45 PM. 0 90 11 0 101 30 0 1 0 31 Total 0 339 46 0' 388 175 0 12 0 187 06:00 PM 0 56 6 0 62 31 0 2 0 33 06:15 PM 0 55 7 0 .62 22 0 1 0 23 Grand Total 0 1497 276 0 1773 791 0 60 0 851 Apprch %q 0 84.4 15.6 0 92.9 0 7.1 0 Total % 0 17.1 3.2 0 20.3 9.1, 0 0.7 0 9.7 4 53 0 0 57 50 72 10 80 0 0 90 89 66 13 91 0 0 104 105 56 4 8T 0 0 .91 .123 80 31' 311 0 0 342 367 274 3 93 0 0 96 141 83 8 86 0 0 94 120 63 10 68 0 0 78 101 56 7 60 0 0 67 131 50 28 307 0 0 335 493 252 9 80 0 0 89 110 37 3 55 0 0 58 103 46 12 135 0 0 1471 213 83 1 145 0 0 1461 90 34 1 158. 0 0 159 81 25 2 303 0 0 3051 171 59 5 159 0 0 164, 81 24 4' 158 0 0 162 72 19 2 194 0 0 196 62 14 2' 163 0 0 165 71 10 13 674 0 0 687 286 67 7 224 0 0 231 52 14 1 204 0 0 205 47 10 2 146 0 0 148 43 8 4 160 0 0 164 78 1.1 14 734 0 0 748 220' 43 2 137 0 0 139 68 11 2' 116 0 0 118 74 8 117 2778 0 0 2895 2013 940 4 96 0 0 62.6 29.2 1.3 31.8 0 0 33.1 23 10.8 10 0 132 248 10' 0 165 353 11 0 172 403 4 0 267 417 35 0 676 1421 10 0 234 415 14 6 197 410 10 0 167 352 14 0 195 330 48 0 793 1507 12 0 159 345 16 0 1651 305 28 0 3241 650 12 0 136 441 16 0 122 415 28 0 2581 856 16 0 121 430 15 0. 106 374 12 0 88 445 11 0 92 400 .54 0 407 1649 7 0 73 466 12 0 69 420 9 0 60 340 7 0 96 392. 35 0 298' 1618 13 0 92 326 17 0 99 302 264 0 3217 8736 8.2 0 3 0 36.8 WSRA Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Valley View Rd & W 65th St (ramp) File Name : valley view rd & w 65th, st -eb ramp. 6:30 -9;30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Site Code : 00000004 Edina, MN Start Date : 2/22/2012 sunny, 30's Page No : 2 Pank 14nur fnr PnWa Intpmanfinn Ranins at n7•An'AM 07:30 AM Valley View Rd From North W 65th St From East Valley View Rd From South TH 62 off ramp From West 99 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Toter Right Thru Left Peds App.Tule1 Right Thru Left Peds App. ToW Right Thru Left Peds I., Tow. InLTota1 Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 AM to 11 :45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 0 Pank 14nur fnr PnWa Intpmanfinn Ranins at n7•An'AM 07:30 AM 0 80 19 0 99 27 0 1 0 28 13 91 0 0 104 105 .56 11 0 172 403 07:45 AM 0 81 20 0 101 16 0 2 0 18 4 87 0 0 91 123 80 4. 0 207 417 08:00 AM 0 55 10 0 65 18 0 -2 0 20 3 93 0 0 96. 141 83 10 0 234 415 08:15 AM 0 77 15 0 92 24 0 3 0 27 .8 86 0 . 0 94 120 63 14 Qs 197 410 Total Volume 0 293 64 0 357 85 0 8` 0 9.3 - 28 357 0 0 385 489 282 . 39'. 0 810: 1645 % App. Total 0 82.1 17.9 6 91.4 0 8.6 6 7.3 92`7 0 0 60.4 34.8 .. 4.8 . 0 PHF .000 .904 .800 .000 .684 .787 .000 .667 .000 ' .830 '.538 .960 .000 .000 .925 .867 .849 .696 .000. .865' .986 i F J CL CIA o N 2 —► _em � CD 101 oN a out" Val ey View In Total . 481 Er 838 01 293 .84 0 Right Thru ' Left Peds Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Unshifted +, T r Left Thru Flight Peds 01 3571 281 0 790 1 F 1175 Out In Total Valley View Rd w `v0 0 w �3 w X43 Valley View Rd & W 65th St (ramp) 3:30 -9:30 am and 3:30 =6:30 pm Edina, MN sunny, 30's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : valley view rd & w 65th st-eb ramp Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page No : 3 reaK rrour Analysis rrom 7Z:uu rBn r0 uo:lo rm - reaK 7 or 7 Peak Hour for Entira Intarsactlon Raoins at 04:30 PM I- Total 04:30 PM Valley View Rd From North W 65th St From East Valley View Rd From South TH 62 off ramp From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds app.rad Right Thti Left Peds AppT.W Right ThrU Left I Peds 12 Right Thru Left I Peds App. TOM reaK rrour Analysis rrom 7Z:uu rBn r0 uo:lo rm - reaK 7 or 7 Peak Hour for Entira Intarsactlon Raoins at 04:30 PM I- Total 04:30 PM 0 74 11 0 85 75 0 1 0 76 2 194 0 0 196 62 14 12 0 88 445 04:45 PM 0 75 11 0 66 48 0 9 0 57 2 163 0 0 165 71 10 11 0 92 400 05:00 PM 0 82 10 0 92 65 0 5 0 70 7 224 0 0 231 52 14 7 0 73 466 05:15 PM 0 90 12 0 102 41 0 3 0 44 1 204 0 0 205 47 10 12 0 69 420 Total Volume 0 321 44 0 365 229 0 18 0 247 12 785 0 0 797 232 48 42 0 322 1731 % App. Total 0 87.9 12.1 0 92.7 0 7.3 0 1..5 98.5 0 0 72 14.9 13 0 PHF 1 .000 .892 .917 .000 .895 .763 .000 .500 .000 .813 _429 .876 .000 .000 .863—t.817 .857 .875 .000 875 .875—t- .929 i, X, I Valley View Rd Out In Total 1056 365 14211 E- 1 01 321 44 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data o c*'� r� �0 CL m North ~2 *5 Peek Hour Begins at 04:30 PM A w N ,_ Unshifted r v O �a °Z CL o No Left Thru Right Peds 01 7851 121 0 571 1 F 1366 Out In Total Vale V i, X, I France Ave & 65th St 6:30 -9:30 am and. 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 30's From North WS B & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN From East File Name : fance ave & 65th s+ Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page No : 1 ' From West 06:45 AM 40 72 84 0 1961 15 4 4 0 231 15 72 19 0 1061 2 32 5 0 391 364 Total 75 135 145 0 3551 25 8 5 0 381 23 113 36 0 1721 4 49 9 0 621 627 07:00 AM 19 93 48 0 160 29 3 1 0 33 12 77 14 0 103 6 35 14 0 55 351 07:15 AM 27 132 68 0 227 33 8 3 0 44 23 76 20 0 119 3 43 20 0 66 456 07:30 AM 18 134 56 0 208 45 12 2 0 59 18 93 34 0 145 9 42 13 0 64 476 07:45 AM 19 172 64 0 255 36 13 5 0 54 29 115 34 0 178 4 54 15 0 73 560 Total 83 531 236 0 850 143 36 11 0 190 82 361 102 0 545 22 174 62 0 258 1843 08:00 AM 19 143 51 0 213 38 15 5 0 58 20 116 25 0 161 9 52 11 0 72 504 08:15 AM 26 173 54 0 253 52 13 15 0 80 26 124 27 1 178 6 50 22 0 78 589 08:30 AM 24 161 58 0 243 54 12 15 0 81 30 123 13 0 166 13 51 21 0 85 575 08:45 AM 21 156 54 0 231 49 9 19 0 77 35 139 16 0 190 9 35 13 1 58 556 Total 90 633 217 0 940 193 49 54 0 296 111 502 81 1 695 37 188 67 1 293 2224 I I 1 09:15 AM 26 157 60 0 243 60 10 13 84 I 33 137 14 0 1841 8 36 21 0 65 I 576 Total 49 352 115 0 5161 121 28 25 1 1751 65 278 30 0 3731 17 60 38 0 1151 1179 03:30 PM I 14 171 44 0 230 1 100 03:45 PM 11 190 29 0 1 100 29 19 I 149 27 268 15 0 3101 20 25 25 0 I 759 Total 25 361 73 0 4591 198 59 34 1 2921 42 509 34 0 • 585 44 70 64 0 178 1514 04:00 PM 14 163 34 0 211 100 26 20 0 146 10 258 13 0 281 26 29 44 0 99 737 04:15 PM 6 180 24 0 210 83 17 19 2 121 22 270 8 0 300 20 27 31 0 78 709 04:30 PM 6 178 19 0 203 110 36 14 0 160 14 251 12 0 277 26 26 43 0 95 735 04:45 PM 10 196 27 0 233 92 16 9 0 117 18 309 12 0 339 23 17 26 0 66 755 Total 36 717 104 0 857 385 95 62 2 544 64 1088 45 0 1197 95 99 144 0 338 2936 05:00 PM 6 165 18 0 189 102 25 15 2 144 16 334 10 0 360 38 23 33 0 94 787 05:15 PM 5 197 12 0 214 68 18 12 0 98 19 344 10 0 373 21 18 29 0 68 753 05:30 PM 6 194 12 0 212 56 22 8 0 86 9 274 17 0 300 13 13 19 0 45 643 05:45 PM 5 212 15 0 232 47 3 11 0 61 5 248 11 0 264 8 15 21 0 44 601 Total 22 768 57 0 847 273 68 46 2 389 49 1200 48 0 1297 80 69 102 0 251 2784 06:00 PM 6 168 15 1 190 33 3 1 0 37 6 275 8 0 289 15 12 23 0 50 566 06:15 PM 7 193 17 0 217 51 7 3 0 61 10 289 5 0 304 10 3 15 0 28 610 Grand Total 393 3858 979 1 5231 1422 353 241 6 2022 452 4616 389 1 5457 324 724 524 1 1573 14283 Apprch % 7.5 73.8 18.7 0 70.3 17.5 11.9 0.3 8.3 84.6 7.1 0 20.6 46 33.3 0.1 Total % 2.8 27 6.9 0 36.6 10 2.5 1.7 0 14.2 3.2 32.3 2.7 0 38.2 2.3 5.1 3.7 0 11 kqo WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN prance Ave & 65th St 00 -9:30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 30's File Name : france ave & 65th st Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/22/2012_ Page No : 2 Ve8K Flour Analysis KOM UU:3U AM 10 11:40 AIVI - t-eaK 1 Or 1 Dank 1-Inur fnr I7ntlm Inforenrfinn' Ranina of- r1A.IA AM otal Int. Total 08:15 AM France Ave From North 65th St From East France Ave. From South 65th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App.Tatei Right Thru I Left I Peds Ap,we Right Thru I Left I Peds, A,.T.I� Right Thru Left I Peds Am. r Ve8K Flour Analysis KOM UU:3U AM 10 11:40 AIVI - t-eaK 1 Or 1 Dank 1-Inur fnr I7ntlm Inforenrfinn' Ranina of- r1A.IA AM otal Int. Total 08:15 AM 26 173 54•. 0 253 52 13 15 0 80 26 124 27 1 178 6 50 22 0 78 589 08:30 AM 24 161. 58 0 243 54 12 15 0 81 30 123 13 0 166 13 51 21 0 86 575 08:45 AM 21 156 54 0 231 49 9 19 0 77 85 139 16 0 990 9 35 13 1 58 556 09:00 AM 23 195 55 0 273 61 18 12 .0 91 32 141 16 .0 189 9 24 _ 17, 0 K . '503 Total volume 94 685 221 0 1000 .216 52 '.61 0 329 123- 527 72 1 723 1 37 160 73 - 1 271 2323 % App. Total 9.4 68.5 22.1 0 65.7 ..15.8 18.5 0 17 72.9 10 0.1 13.7 59 26.9 0.4 PHF 1 .904 .878 .953 .000, .916 .885 122 .803 .000. .904 .879 .934 .667 .250 .951 .712 .784 .830 .250 .797 .963 �R°� 1 rance Ave Out In Total 816 1000 1816 94 885 221 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 0 o� C9 '�C-J� w North N Peak Hour Begins at 08:15 AM ro N Unshirted m ON To I r+ Left Thru Right Peds 721 5271 1231 1 783 723 F 1506 Out In Total Emn. Ave �R°� 1 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 65th St 6:30 -9:30 am and 3:30 -6:30 pm Edina, MN 30's File Name : france ave & 65th st Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/22/2012 Page No 3 F'eaK HOUr Anaiysls From 12:UU F'M to Uti:15 F'M - I-eaK 1 Or 1 n_.A, U_. : - _a /l n 0R fi ' Int. Total 04:30 PM France Ave From North 65th St From East France Ave :From South 65th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Pads app.Twm Right Thal Left I Peds app. T" Right ThlU Left I Peds app.Tjw Right Thru. Left Peds AMTmm F'eaK HOUr Anaiysls From 12:UU F'M to Uti:15 F'M - I-eaK 1 Or 1 n_.A, U_. : - _a /l n 0R fi ' Int. Total 04:30 PM 6 178 19 0 203 110 36 14 0 160 14 251 12 0 277 26 26 43 0 96 735 04:45 PM 10 196 27 0 233 92 16 9 0 117 18 309 12 0 339 23 IT 26 0 66 755 05:00 PM 6 165 18 0 189 102 25 16- 2 144 16 ' 334 .10 0 360 38 23 33 0 94 787 05:15 PM 5 197 12 0 214 68 18 12 0 98 19 344 10 0 373' 21 18. 29 0 68 '• 753 Total Volume 27 736 76 0 839 372 95 50 2 519 67 .1236 44- 0 1349 108 84 131 0 323 3030 %A . Total- " 3.2 87.7. 9.1 0 711 18.3 9.6 0.4 5 ::,91.8 3.3 0 33.4 26 40.6 0 PHF .675 .934 .704 .000 .900 .845 .660 .833 .250 - .811 1 .882 .900 .917 .000 .904 .711 .808 .762 .000 .850 .963 +,rr+ Left Thru Right Peds 441 12381 671 0 89 1349 2243 Out In . Total ce Fran Ave w France Ave Out In Total 1741 1 839 f 25801 271 736 78 0 N r RIOht Thru Left Peds @r o Peak Hour Data � N ' a0 North - ~ V10 " CF O r���--1 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM rr i Unshifted OFto o�. +,rr+ Left Thru Right Peds 441 12381 671 0 89 1349 2243 Out In . Total ce Fran Ave w wo N r as @r o m A 4 H N � Report Id - CustomList -94 Site Name - 65th ST -EAST OF VALLEY VIEW -RD Description - ,Edina, MN Direction - North East South West AB= WESTBOUND BA= EASTBOUND Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12.00 AM 7 5 2 1:00 AM 7 4 3 2:00 AM 2 1 1 3:00 AM 3 2 1 4:00 AM 14 3 11 5 :00 AM 64 19 45 6:00 AM 282 53 229 7:00 AM 436 111 325 8:00 AM 471 152 319 9:00 AM 378 137 241 10:00 AM 344 107 237 11:00 AM 324 127 197 12:00 PM 293 134 159 1:00 PM 382 176 206 2:00 PM 425 176 249 3:00 PM 486 273 213 4:00 PM 437 241 196 5:00 PM 333: 174 159 6:00 PM 179 79 100 7:00 PM 116 56 60 8:00 PM 83 34 49 9:00 PM 56 29 27 10:00 PM 47 15 32 11:00 PM 42 41 1 Thursday, "February 2392012 12:00 AM 6 6 3 3 3 3 1:00 AM 3 3 1 1 2 2 2:00 AM 5 5 2 2 3 3 3:00 AM 5 5 2 2 3 3 4:00 AM 1 17 7 7 1 10 5:00 AM 5 58 1 18 4 40 6:00 AM 2 281 5 55 2 226 7:00 AM 4 480 1 121 3 359 8:00 AM 4 445 1 119 3 326 9:00 AM 3 327. 1 126 2 201 10:00 AIVI 3 344 1 109 2 235 11:00 AM 3 300 1 121 1 179 12:00 PM 2 287 1 119 1 168 1:00 PM 3 373 1 150 2 223 2:00 PM 4 415 1 181 2 234 3:00 PM 4 454 2 245 2 209 4:00 PM 3 388 2 221 1 167 5:00 PM 3 366 1 175 1 191 6:00 PM 1 191 7 77 1 114 7:00 PM 8 85 4 48 3 37 S:OO PM 6 61 2 22 3 39 9:00 PM 4 45 2 22 2 23 10:00 PM 4 45 1 15 3 30 11:00 PM 4 45 3 38 7 7 IN$ VehideCount -92 Page 2 • Wednesday, February 22, 2012 - Total =5211, .15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300.0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200'1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 7 7 2 3 14 64 282 436 471 -378 344 324 293 382 425 486 437 333 179 116 83 56 47 42 4 0 0 2 2 '11 39 92 117 101 82 69 63 88 .95 '102 132 '114 61 25 26 23 10 6 '1 1 '. 3 1 0 3 11 58 109 .134 96 90 97' 70 107 100 128 83 86 48 27 17 15 7 7 2 2 3 0 0 3 12 93 113 126 83 99 73 74 89 110 146 125 74' 32 32 15 8 17 21 3 '0 1 1 1 6 30 92 122' 94 98 . 73 85 86 98 120 110 97 59 38 32 25 10 13 8 0 . AM Peak 0745 - 0845 (499), AM PHF-0.93 PM Peak 1515 -1615 (515), PM PHF =0:88 " Thursday, February 23, 2012 - Total= 5026,15 minute drops , 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200.2300 6 3 5 5 17 58 281 480 445 327 344 300 287 373 415 '454 388 366 .191 85 .61 45 45 45. 1 0 3 2 -1 9 .29 95 117 93 '89 77 .76 106 85 92 107 117 59 25 20 19 7 11 - 2 2 1 1 3 12 59 127 112 77 85 68 65 89 '107 12S 95 93 60 17 11 11 10 8 - 3 1 0 1 8 13 88 122 114 83 85 73 72 80 108 132 100 89, 39 25 15 '7 17 '18 - 0 0 1 1 5 24 105 136 102 74 85 82 74 98 115 107 86 67 33 18 15 8 11 8 - AM Peak 0715 - 0815 (502), AM PHF =0.92 IN$ Report Id - CustomList -93 17' .3. Site Name - 65th St -.West of France Ave Description - Edina MN 3 0 Direction - North East South West 2:00 AM AB= WESTBOUND 1 3 BA =EASTBOUND 4 3 Wednesday,' February 22, 2012 24 15 9 5:00 AM 80 61 19 6:00 AM 308 214 94 7:00 AM 464 222 242 8:00 AM 451 197 254 9:00 AM 376 163 12:00`AM " 12 3 9 1:00 AM 8 4 4 2:00 AM 1 0 1 3:00 AM 5 3 2 4:00 AM 17 12 5 5:00 AM 76 57 19 6:00 AM 304 205 99 7:00 AM 441 211 230 8:00 AM 470 208 262 9:00 AM 403 183 220 10:00 AM 393 155 238 11:00 AM 365 145 220 12:00 PM 368 180 188 1:00 PM 409 194 215 2:00 PM. 437 188 249 3:00 PM, 507 221 286 4:00 PM 456 167 289 5:00 PM 354 141 213 6:00 PM 196 79 117 7:00 PM 107 32 75 8:00 PM 98 41 57 9:00 PM 69 24 45 10:00 PM 44 17 _ 27 11:00 PM 37 ;7 30 Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:00 AM 17' .3. 14 1:00 AM 3 0 3 2:00 AM 4 1 3 3:00 AM 4 3 1 4:00 AM 24 15 9 5:00 AM 80 61 19 6:00 AM 308 214 94 7:00 AM 464 222 242 8:00 AM 451 197 254 9:00 AM 376 163 213 10:00 AM 380 147 233 11:00 AM 347 131 216 12:00 PM 376 161 215 1:00 PM 425 179 246 2:00 PM 448 201 247 3:00 PM 479 185 294 4:00 PM 394 146 248 5:00 PM 375 137 238 6:00 PM 221 96 125 7:00 PM 108 39 69 8:00 PM 79 25 54 9:00 PM 62. 25 37 10:60 PM., 56 22 34 11!00 PM 43 5 38 VehicleCount -91 Page 2 * Wednesday, February 22, 2012 -Total =5577, 15 minute 4 1 0 2 4 10 48 89 111 101 103 81 77 96 91 102 134 124 54 29 29 26 11 5 4 3 3 1 1 1 17 71 105 140 104 101 97 94 113 102 130 103 91 55 26 23 22 5 10 5 3 3 0 0 6 14 90 121 113 82 104 88 107 100 118 138 115 77 47 30 18 8 18 17 5 2 1 0 2 6 35 95 126 106 116 85 99 90 100 126 137 104 62 40 22 28 13 10 5 3 AM Peak 0730 - 0830 (498), AM PHF =0.89 PM Peak 1516 -1615 (539), PM PHF =0.98 * Thursday, February 23, 2012 - Total =5524, 15 minute drops 4 0 2 2 4 9 38 89 114 103 93 95 99 107 87 100 114 108 68 29 30 27 9 16 - 5 2 1 0 5 15 65 113 130 97 87 83 92 104 120 120 100 111 59 22 13 15 13 6 - 5 1 0 1 11 24 98 123 97 89 101 77 89 90 121 125 96 86 51 33 19 12 21 14 - 3 0 1 1 4 32 107 139 110 87 99 92 96 124 120 134 84 70 43 .24 17 8 13 7 - AM Peak 0730 - 0830 (506), AM PHF =0.91 Engineering Department • Phone 952 -826 -0371 Fax 952'826 -0392 • www.tityofEdina.com UI 1 U ;C Date: June 19, 2012 To:. Cary Teague - Community Development Director From: Wayne D. Houle — City Engineer Re: Review of Planning Submittal for Edina Medical; Plaa . 6500 .France Avenue Y Engineering has reviewed the revised plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O . A Nine ,Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. O It appears that all storm water is treated on site; provide all storm water calculations that indicate this. O A developer's agreement will be required for realigning of the public watermain and also the installation of the sidewalk on both West 65`h Street and France Avenue. Sheet C3.0 Site Plan: • Per, the City's Curb Out Ordinance - curb cuts can only be.a maximum of 30 -feet wide. I would suggest placing a median between the "in" and "out" drives so, that you would have a 14 -foot wide "in" and two 12 -foot wide "out" lanes. • Incorporate or plan for new intersection improvements along France. Avenue. These are the intersection improvements that the' Transportation Commission is currently designing. • Install "Do Not Enter" signs at driveway along. France Avenue. ] Sheet C5.0 Utility Plan: • Provide a -fire hydrant mid. - property along West 65th Street and, also one along France Avenue locations. to be determined by City Engineer and Fire Marshal • Provide a treatment structure for the storm sewer system prior to draining to -the infiltration basin due to this area being in.the medium vulnerability area for the Drinking Water Surface Management . Area. Provide a copy of a maintenance agreement between the property owner and watershed district for the infiltration basin and treatment structure. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Engineering Department • 7450 Metro 131vd - Edina, MN 55439 V. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Platteter moved approval of the April 11, 2012, meeting minutes. Commissioner Scherer Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Front Yard Setback Variance — Kristi Wenner — 5025 Nob Hill, Edina, MN — continued B. Sign Variance — Andy Mitchell /John Dinwiddie — 5225 Schaefer Rd., Edina, MN - withdrawn C. Preliminary Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Development Plan — Mount Development Company — 6500 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Mount Properties is proposing to tear down the existing office building at 6500 France Avenue to build a new five - story, 69,310 square foot medical office /retail building with an attached parking ramp. The first level would contain 7,000 square feet of retail space including a coffee shop, barber shop and medical supplies. The next four levels would contain 62,310 square feet of medical office. Teague explained that in order to obtain the above - mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a two -step process. The first step in the process is to obtain the following approvals: 1. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for two items (this required four - fifths vote of the Council for approval): a) Amendment to allow a building height of 5 stories and 69 feet on this site. The Comprehensive Plan requires a maximum height of 4 stories or 48 feet; b) Amendment to allow a floor area ratio of 1.23 or 123 %. The Comprehensive Plan requires a maximum of 1.0 or 100 %; 2. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and 3. Preliminary Development Plan. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan are approved by the City Council, the following is required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to PUD. Page 2 of 11 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. Planner Teague asked the Commission to recall they considered a Sketch Plan for this project at their February 22, 2012 meeting and provided comment. Continuing, Teague said that since the Sketch Plan review, the building size has increased from 60,000 square feet to 69,310 square feet and from four to five stories; however, the setback has increased from 15 feet to 25 feet from France Avenue to provide for a more .pedestrian friendly environment along France. Store openings onto France Avenue have been added for the retail space. Continuing, Teague explained that this property is.. located within an area of the Citythat is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." Teague noted that the City Council did not consider a Sketch Plan. review so they were unable to determine if a Small Area Plan was necessary. Teague stated that the decision to require a Small Area Plan shall be made by the City Council, adding that the site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for `Regional Medical - RM. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan designation. Teague said at this time the applicant is requesting a rezoning of this site from Planned Office District -1, (POD -1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Planned Office District allows for medical office buildings up to a floor area ratio of .5. (50 %) Under current zoning a 28,000 square foot office building would be permitted. The proposed 69,300 square foot building would have a floor area ratio of 1.23 (123 %) Therefore, the proposed rezoning is requested. Continuing, Teague added currently the site is guided for Regional Medical use; therefore, the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plah. The Regional Medical Zoning District allows a floor area ratio of 1.0. (100 %) The applicant is proposing a development that would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan guides this site'a§ Regional Medical; therefore, the proposed medical office with complementary retail uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal would create amore efficient and creative use of the property. The building would be..pulled up close to the street, with sidewalksin front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. Parking would be located in back. Landscaping and patios are also proposed in front, with store fronts opening toward France Avenue. The applicant is also proposing to utilize sustainable design principals. Solar panels would also be used. Planner Teague reported that a traffic study was also done by WSB, which concludes that the existing roadways would support the proposed uses. However, as was conditioned in the approvals for Twin City Orthopedic, should signal improvements be deemed necessary at 65th Street and France Avenue, the property owner would be required to participate in Page 3of11 h91 appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements. This would be a requirement in the Developer's Agreement. During the Sketch Plan review the Planning Commission requested information regarding bus routes and bus stops in the area. The applicant has submitted that information. Bus Route #6 and #684 go down 651h Street with the closest stop at Fairview Hospital. Rooftop equipment, once constructed would be required to meet all state requirements Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council deny the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow a 5- story, 69 foot tall building on the site; and recommend the City Council approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan to allow a building height of 4 stories and 55 feet. Denial and revised approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed height of 69 feet tall and 5 stories would allow a density on the site even greater than Fairview Southdale Hospital site which has a floor area ratio of 1.16. 2. A density of 1.23 is far greater than the density allowed for a similar project for Twin City Orthopedic at 4010 West 65th Street, which had a floor area ratio of .85. 2. The Comprehensive Plan contemplates a maximum height of 4 stories on this site, with a podium height of 2 stories up close to the street. The proposal does not contemplate podium height; rather it would have a 5- story building up to the street with only a 25 foot setback. 4. A height of 55 feet, only 7 seven feet above the Comprehensive Plan Standard is reasonable for this site, given the retail use on the main level and the medical office uses above. Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned unit development. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street. 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, glass and concrete. A four story building would be generally consistent with the four story buildings on West 65th Street. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. 5. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: Page 4 of 11 a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that.helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. ■ Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. ■ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. Preliminary approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated March 28th 2012 & April 4, 2012 with the following revisions: a. The 5th story of the building shall be removed. b. The floor area ratio shall be no more than the maximum of 100% or 1.0. C. The parking ramp must be finished on the west and south elevation to match the north elevation, including the continuation of the cornice from the medical building. d. The Lindens proposed along the west lot line be replaced with a Juniper or some type of Evergreen. Also, the proposed Sugar Maples should be replaced with Norway Maples. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives. 3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated April 20, 2012. Page 5 of 11 S. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 6. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. Appearing for the Applicant Stephen Michals, Mount Development Co., Ed Farr, Edward Farr Architects, Mark Rausch, Alliant Engineering, Stacy Gallup and Olivia Spyra, Tangletown Gardens. Applicant Presentation Ed Farr addressed the Commission and explained that the building has been revised since Sketch Plan Review from four to five stories; increasing the setback from France Avenue from 15 -feet to 25 -feet. This shift creates a more pedestrian friendly environment along France Avenue, narrows the profile of the building and opens store fronts onto France Avenue. Continuing, Farr noted an additional buffer was added for the parking ramp, adding that he agrees with Edina' Forrester that Junipers or some type of Evergreen would replace the proposed Linden trees along the west lot line. Farr acknowledged the Evergreens would provide screening all year long. Farr introduced Olivia Spyra to address plantings. Ms. Spyra said her company is very familiar with urban settings, adding that choosing the correct plants and vegetation to enhance and beautify the building fagade, entryway and along the sidewalk is the goal. Continuing, Farr noted that Green Building Practices would be implemented during construction including roof mounted solar panels. Farr said at this time he doesn't know if the building would be Leed Certified. Farr presented a materials board pointing out the building would have detailed brick design on all four sides. The building would also include brick accents and a lime stone colored base. Concluding, Farr said the building would be layered with the distinctive crown added on top to celebrate and embrace the Gateway approach of this development. Stacy Gallup addressed the Commission and informed them she was one of the owners of the property and on behalf of the other owners was expressing support for the project. Gallup said in her opinion the site in its present condition is dated and the existing building is not in scale with the rest of the area. Concluding, Gallup said in her opinion this site was deserving of a special building. Stephen Michals addressed the Commission and said in calculating the right building height they looked at all neighboring properties (FS Hospital 124', Point of France 123', Southdale Medical Center 92' etc.) and found that the majority of buildings were taller than the proposed building. Michals said that the goal of the development team was to construct a building that's compatible and complementary to the area. Continuing, Michals said the same can be said for the FAR (Floor Area Ratio), noting the FAR ranges in the area can be Page 6 of 11 boa from 1.0 to 2.6 Concluding, Michals acknowledged the sustainable development measures implemented for this project and asked for consideration of those measures as an incentive togrant higher density. Michals stated this is a very special corner. Discussion /Comments Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Rickart how peak times were determined. Rickart explained that traffic counts were taken along the West 65th Street corridor between Valley View Road and France Avenue. Counts were taken in the AM and PM at the major intersections and driveways onto West 65th Street. Continuing. Rickart explained that they found -that the AM peak hours were the worst case scenario. Rickart said that counts were taken at the,end of February documenting the existing. conditions and capacity. He further explained that intersections are given a Level of Service grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average am., ount of control delay per vehicles. Rickart said they found that patterns are acceptable; however, there were some worst cases found and that was in left hand turns. Rickart continued and explained the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition was used to calculate the estimated trip generations from the proposed redevelopment. This "manual" is based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates from other similar land uses. This includes several land uses. (retail, medical office, shared trips etc.) Concluding Rickart said a computer software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual methodologies were also used to build each signalized intersection. Rickart reiterated that based on the analysis documented no additional improvements need to be implemented other than those show on the site plan. Commissioner, Carpenter said he observed that traffic volumes on France Avenue appear to be dropping and asked Mr. Rickart if he knows the reason(s). Rickart acknowledged that observation adding the drop hasn't been significant; however it's there and other areas are also experiencing drops in traffic volume. Rickart said the economy could be a factor. Commissioner Forrest questioned if there were any issues with the double center turn lane. Rickart responded that movement was reviewed and a certain amount of storage was allocated. He stated at this time he sees no issues. Commissioner P. latteter acknowledged the building was setback.farther from France Avenue; however, a 5th story was added. Platteter asked if this change drove the need for a 5th floor. Michals responded that pushing the building farther back from France Avenue created additional costs and to offset those costs another floor was added. Platteter referred to the plans noting the plans indicate a distance between the proposed building and ramp. Continuing, Platteter said if the parking ramp were attached to the building that "saved space" would allow the deeper setback from France Avenue without impacting building square footage. Farr explained there is .a distance of 17 -feet between the proposed building and ramp and if the ramp were attached to the building the building would lose all its window and offices with windows are very desirable. Concluding, Commissioner Platteter said at Sketch Plan Review a sky bridge was discussed and asked if that was "still on the table ". Ed Farr responded that isn't part of this application. Page 7 of 11 k)o3 Commissioner Scherer also expressed interest in the sky bridge, adding in her opinion it's an attractive option. Scherer asked if logistically a sky bridge can be built, do the floors line up etc. Mr. Michals agreed that a sky bridge is an attractive option, adding it can be done. Public Testimony John Windhorst, 6566 France Avenue addressed the Commission and stated he is the president of the Point of France Association and said in his judgment the mass of the proposed building is just too much. Windhorst said it's possible he could support the staff suggestion of a 4 -story building; however, the building proposed at 5- stories is too much! Mark Waterston, 6566 France Avenue said he agrees with Windhorst and informed the Commission another issue that concerns him is emergency vehicle access to the hospital. Waterston pointed out it is imperative that ambulances get to the hospital in a timely manner and additional congestion could hinder that. Waterston said he actually saw an ambulance stuck at an intersection. Continuing, Waterston stated this is a unique corner and the City has the unique opportunity to ensure this corner is developed appropriately. Concluding, Waterston said he is also concerned with loading dock placement and that a retail component like Walgreen's or CVS could "move in" Dave Michaels, 6566 France Avenue addressed the Commission and noted he supports the suggestion by staff to cap the building at 4- stories. Michaels said in his opinion the proposed building is just too tall and the site is too dense. Gary Linkletter, 6566 France Avenue asked if the ramp would be paid parking. Linkletter said he was concerned if there's a fee that "visitors" would park in Point of Frances parking lot and walk over. Concluding, Linkletter said he agrees with all comments reiterating in his opinion the proposed building is too tall and would require too many variances to construct. Susan Ladermen, 6566 France Avenue, told the Commission she objects to all variances, adding she doesn't want to see more traffic problems created for this area. She stated in her opinion there is too many "what ifs" with this proposal. Ron Kellick, 6566 France Avenue complemented the architect on the building and stated it's a great design; however, Point of France is his home and he wants to retain his view. Concluding, Kellick said this building is way too much for this corner. Chair Grabiel asked the applicant for clarification on a question raised by a resident on if the ramp would be a paid parking ramp? Mr. Michals responded in the affirmative. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commission Platteter Page 8 of 11 Aim seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Further Discussion Chair Grabiel asked Planner Teague if he had heard if Southdale was looking to expand. Planner Teague responded that he believes there are plans to build a residential component at the southeast corner of York and West 691h across from the Westin and Key Cadillac; however, no formal application has been made and at this time it's just speculation. Grabiel said it was interesting for him to learn that in this immediate area the majority of the buildings :are:tall; seven of which' are higher than what's proposed. Continuing,'Grabiel asked Teague what's -the justification behind the non - support for this building. Teague responded that staff did' struggle with that question. Teague said what it boiled down to was the size of the site and the corresponding FAR if it would be built. Teague pointed out if constructed as proposed the FAR would be greater than the. FAR for other buildings. Teague concluded that to him this is a small site; adding it can't support such a large structure on such a small site. Commissioner Platteter said he observed that a number of the areas buildings have a FAR greater than the proposed building and asked why this building was different, adding he doesn't know the development history of the area. Teague explained that the applicant calculated the FAR of each building on the hospital campus. Staff calculated FAR as one tract; not individual because the zoning classification of the hospital campus was the same. Teague reiterated that the applicant calculated FAR on each individual building, not tract. Commissioner Schroeder addressed the question of building height, adding that his opinion may be contrary to staff s recommendation of 4- stories. Schroeder said in his opinion the goal of the City has been to create a more human scale approach to development and how buildings relate to the, City's streets. Continuing, Schroeder said the Commission worked long and hard on the Comprehensive Plan where the term "podium height" was used to describe this approach. Schroeder explained that "podium height" was generally defined as the portion of the building that abuts the street with podium height established at two stories at the street with the.bulk of the building height behind. Schroeder, pointed out that if he remembers correctly the taller buildings.in the area have a greater front street setback than the proposal; which makes a big difference. Concluding, Schroeder said with this proposal he fails to`see not only what Edina, but the community at large receives for relaxing the standards by granting this a PUD zoning classification. Schroeder said the City should look at what it wants the RMD zoning district to be. This building is a stand - alone building and that may not be the best use of this site. Commissioner Staunton said he continues to be concerned with the "orphan" lot to the west and that instinctively he's uncomfortable with the proposal as presented. He acknowledged that he would be fine with the proposal, including building height, if it met Code and the Comprehensive Guide Plan; however, it doesn't. Staunton pointed out the request for PUD includes exceptions and in his opinion the orphan lot becomes relevant when granting exceptions. Page 9 of 11 A16T Chair Grabiel said he supports the project; especially in light of the fact that the buildings surrounding this parcel are as tall or taller. A discussion ensued on the multiple requests by the applicant and if they can be separated. Chair Grabiel pointed out staff recommended against amending the Comprehensive Plan adding if the Comprehensive Plan wasn't amended the project could the project even proceed. Motion Commissioner Staunton moved to deny the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the rezoning to PUD based on the discussion. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Ayes; Forrest, Scherer, Schroeder, Platteter, Staunton Fischer. Nay, Grabiel Motion carried. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Grabiel acknowledged receipt of the Council Connection and attendance. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Staunton informed the Commission that the City Council at their last meeting on April 17, 2012 adopted the GrandView District Development Framework. Staunton thanked everyone for their support. Commissioner Platteter requested that Commissioners receive minutes from the meetings of the City Council. Commissioner Scherer told the Commission she attended the Volunteer Recognition Dinner where Kevin Staunton was honored with the Mayor's Award for his service on the Commission and on the GrandView District Development Framework project. Scherer said Staunton clearly deserved the honor. Commissioners agreed. X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague informed the Commission the request by JMS for preliminary plat approval for 6120 Brookview was continued to the next City Council meeting on May 2nd. Teague explained that at their last meeting the Council heard the majority of JMS's request to subdivide; however, due to a technical malfunction the applicant was unable to deliver his power point presentation. Planner Teague reminded the Commission that the new City website would be "rolled out" soon and requested that Commissioners (if they haven't already done so) e-mail their photo's to him. Teague added that lastly he would like to inform the Commission that it's Edina's turn to Page 10 of 11 �IbG host the annual "Commissions Get Together" between neighboring cities. Teague asked Commissioners to share with him any ideas on how.or where to host the event. XI. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Scherer moved meeting adjournment at 9:40 pm. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion: All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. �TAU�k•%pi�f Respectfully submitted. Page 11 of 11 Draft ORDINANCE NO. 2012-_ Draft AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AT 6500 FRANCE AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development (PUD) District: 850.23 Planned Unit Development Districts (PUD) Subd. 2. Planned Unit Development District -2 (PUD -2) — Edina, Medical Building, A. Legal Description; All of Lot 4 and the Easterly 56.44 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, Southdale Office Park Second Addition. Hennepin County,. Minnesota. And, . Lot 3, Block 2, except the Easterly 56.44 feet thereof, Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. B. Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the 6500 France Edina Medical Building plans received by the City on , 2012, except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2012- , on file in the Office of the Planning Department under file number 2012- 003.12a. C. Principal Uses; All principal uses allowed in the Regional Medical District (RMD) Zoning District, except drive - through uses. D. Accessory Uses: Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX �6� Off - street parking facilities, Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text — �X* Added text — X �o Produce stands pursuant to permit issued by the City Manager. Signs allowed per the Regional Medical District. E. Conditional Uses: N no e :Development Standards. Development standards E ` RMD Zoning District, except the followingf Building Setbacks. Front - France Avenue 25 feet Front — 65th Street 25 feet Side — West 100 feet Rear — South 30 feet Parking Ramp Setbacks Front — France Avenue 100 feet 'Front — 65th Street 25 feet Side — West 20 feet Rear — South 20 feet Building Height six stories and 80.5-, Maximum Floor Area Ratio 100 Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. .First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text — �X* Added text — X �o City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 856.18 b. the permit shall be applied for only by the owner of the principal building, the intention being that each lessee within the mini - storage building shall not be eligible individually for a temporary retail sales permit. 3. Only non - perishable and non - volatile products may be stored. 850.18 Regional Medical District (RMD) Subd. 1 Principal Uses. A. Hospitals. B. Medical and dental offices and clinics. C. Laboratories for performing medical or dental research, diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical work, having a direct relationship to the providing of health services, including, but not limited to, medical research, radiology, hematology, serology, immunology, allergy, biochemistry, basal metabolism, microbiology, parasitology, pathology, histology, cytology, toxicology and pharmacology. Laboratories engaged in the production or manufacture of goods or products for commercial sale or distribution shall not be considered laboratories within the meaning and intent of this paragraph. Subd. 2Accessory Uses. A. Living quarters and recreational and educational facilities for nurses, interns, staff members, hospital employees and volunteers, if the uses are located within or are contiguous to. the principal building. B. Off - street parking facilities for ambulances, service trucks and automobiles owned by tenants, employees, patients and visitors. C. Within principal buildings having a gross floor area of 40,000 square feet or more, ten percent of the floor area may be occupied by retail uses allowed in the PCD -1 and PCD -2 subdistricts, if the primary function of the uses is to serve the needs of occupants of, and visitors to, the principal use. D. Helistops for use by helicopters involved in emergency rescue operations. Subd. 3Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. FAR: 1.0. B. Setbacks. Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 35'* 35'* 20'* 20'* * or the building height if greater. C. Building Height. See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map. D. Minimum Tract Area. No tract of land shall be transferred to the Regional Medical District unless the tract measures at least ten acres in area or is contiguous to other land in the Regional Medical District. 850-94 Supplement 2012 -01 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.18 b. the permit shall be applied for only by the owner of the principal building, the intention being that each lessee. within the mini - storage building shall not be eligible individually for a temporary retail sales permit. 3. Only non - perishable and non - volatile products may be stored. 850.18 Regional Medical District (RMD) Subd. 1 Principal ,Uses. A. Hospitals. B. Medical and.dental offices and clinics. C. Laboratories for performing medical or dental research, diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical work, having a direct relationship to the providing of health services, including, but not limited to, medical research, radiology, hematology, serology, immunology, allergy, biochemistry, basal metabolism, microbiology, parasitology, pathology, histology, cytology, toxicology and pharmacology. Laboratories engaged in the production or• manufacture of goods or products for commercial sale or distribution shall not be considered laboratories within the meaning and intent of this paragraph. Subd. 2Accessory Uses. A. Living quarters and recreational and educational facilities for nurses, interns, staff members, hospital employees and volunteers, if the uses are located within or are contiguous to the principal building. B. Off - street parking facilities for ambulances, service trucks and automobiles owned by tenants, employees, patients and visitors. C. Within principal buildings having a gross floor area of 40,000 square feet or more, ten percent of the floor area may be occupied by retail uses allowed in the PCD -1 and PCD -2 subdistricts, if the primary function of the uses is to serve the needs of occupants of, and visitors to, the principal use. D. Helistops for use by helicopters involved in emergency rescue operations. Subd. 3Requirements for Building Coverage, Setbacks and Height. A. FAR: 1.0. B. Setbacks. Interior Front Side Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 35'* 35'* 20'* 20'* * or the building height if greater. C. Building Height. See Section 850.22, Building Height Overlay District and Appendix A of the City's Official Zoning Map. D. Minimum Tract Area. No tract of land shall be transferred to the Regional Medical District unless the tract measures at least ten acres in area or is contiguous to other land in the Regional Medical District. 850-94 Supplement 2012 -01 N City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.16 2. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to. those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance. 850.16 Planned Commercial District (PCD). Subd. 1 Subdistricts. The Planned Commercial District shall be divided into the following subdistricts: Planned Commercial District - 1 (PCD -1) Planned Commercial District - 2 (PCD -2) Planned Commercial District - 3 (PCD -3) Planned Commercial District- 4 (PCD -4) Subd. 2Principal Uses in PCD -1. Antique, shops. Art galleries. Art studios. Bakeries, provided the room or rooms containing the preparation and baking process shall not have a gross floor area in excess of 2,500 square feet. Barber shops. Beauty parlors. Bicycle stores, including rental, repair and sales. Book and stationery stores. Camera and photographic-'supply stores. Candy and ice cream stores. Clothes pressing and tailoring shops. Clothing stores not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. Clubs, lodge halls and meeting rooms, offices and other facilities for non - profit organizations not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. Coin and philatelic stores. Day care. Drug stores. Dry cleaning establishments. and laundries. Employment agencies. (� .850-79 Supplement 2012 -01 City' of Edina Land -Use, Platting and Zoning 850.16 Financial institutions, but excluding drive - through facilities and pawn shops. Florist shops. Food, grocery, meat, fish, bakery and delicatessen stores. Garden supply, tool and seed stores. ..Gift shops. Handball courts, racquetball courts and exercise and reducing salons. Hardware stores. Hobby shops'for the sale of goods,to.be assembled and used off the premises. Household furnishings, fixtures and accessory, stores not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. Interior decorating establishments. Jewelry stores. Launderettes. Leather goods stores. Liquor stores, municipally owned, off -sale. Locksmith shops. Medical and dental clinics. Music and video sales and rental stores. Musical. instruments stores and repair shops. Newsstands. Offices,, including both business and professional. Optical stores. Paint and wallpaper stores not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. Personal apparel stores not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. Picture framing and picture stores. Repair stores and "fix -it" shops which provide services for the repair of home, gar_ den, yard and personal use appliances. Restaurants, but excluding "drive -ins" and drive- through facilities, other than as allowed in Section 850.07, Subd. 14.17 Schools. Second -hand stores not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area, but excluding pawn shops. /, 13 850 - 80 Supplement 2012 -01 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.16 ' Shoe sales or repair stores. Sporting and camping goods stores not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. Tailor shops. Tobacco shops. Toy shops. Travel bureaus and transportation ticket offices. Variety, gift, notion and soft goods stores.. Vending machines which are coin or card operated, but excluding amusement devices. Subd. 3 Principal Uses in PCD -2. Any principal use permitted in PCD -1. Amusement and recreation establishments such as amusement arcades, commercial bowling alleys and pool halls. Animal hospitals and kennels, but excluding establishments with outside runs. Automotive accessory stores, but excluding repair and service garages. Blueprinting, printing and Photostatting establishments. Business machine sales and service shops. Catering establishments. Clothing stores. Clubs, lodge halls and meeting rooms, offices and other facilities for non - profit organizations. Commercial kennels as defined by Subsection 300.01 of the City Code. Currency exchanges as defined in M.S. 53A. Department stores not exceeding 40,000 square feet of gross floor area. Dry goods stores. Electrical and household appliance stores, including radio and television sales and service. Exterminating offices. Fabric stores. Frozen food stores including the rental of lockers in conjunction therewith. Furniture stores including upholstering when conducted as an incidental part of the principal use. Fraternal, philanthropic and charitable institution offices and assembly halls. 850-81 Supplement 2012 -01 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.16 Furrier shops including the storage and conditioning. of furs when conducted as an incidental part of the principal use. Home repair, maintenance and remodeling stores and shops. Hotels, motels and motor inns. Household furnishings, fixtures and accessories stores. Laboratories, medical and dental. Office supplies stores. Orthopedic and medical appliance stores, but excluding the manufacturing or assembly of appliances or goods. Paint and wallpaper stores. Personal apparel stores. Pet shops. Photography studios. Post offices. Public utility service stores. Rental agencies for the rental only of clothing, appliances, automobiles, cartage trailers, and household fixtures, furnishings and accessories, excluding pawn shops. Schools for teaching music, dance or business vocations. Sporting and camping goods stores. Taxidermist shops. Telegraph offices. Theaters, but excluding outdoor or "drive -in" facilities. Ticket agencies. Trading stamps redemption stores. Undertaking and funeral home establishments. Subd. 4. Principal Uses in PCD -3. Any principal use permitted in PCD -2, except offices requiring the issuance of a conditional use permit. Department stores or shopping centers exceeding 40,000 square feet of gross floor area. Transit stations. Publicly owned uses. �[S 850 -82 Supplement 2012 -01 KVERNSTOEN, RONNHOLM & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS 27 March 2012 Q� � tip�ti Steve Michals Mount Development Co. 10400 Viking Dr. Suite 160 Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 NOISE MONITORING REPORT: 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH Kvernstoen, Ronnholm & Associates, Inc. was retained by Mount Development Co. to measure noise levels at the property lines at the 6500 France location, and to verify the sound levels produced by the Rooftop Units (RTU's) on the proposed new building. To that end I traveled to the site on 3/16/2012 to perform statistical noise measurements at the locations shown ,on Fig. 1. Procedure Each measurement period was 30 minutes. The microphone was set on a tripod at the locations shown on Fig 1. The meter used was a Larson -Davis precision noise level meter (SN #150) equipped with logging functions and a wind screen for the microphone. The meter was field - calibrated directly before and after the measurements. The temperature was 79 degree F, with very light breezes from the South. Barometric pressure was 29.3 inches Hg. Results Measurement results are shown in Table 1 on the next page. I have included several statistical measurements in order to show the variability of the traffic noise, although the only important number is the L50 metric. The Lxx numbers 2444 BRYANT AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 300 • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 TEL 612.374.3800 • FAX 612.374.3133 • eMAIL info @kracoustics.com Al 6 6500 France Avenue Noise Monitoring 27 March 2012 Page 2 refer to the percentage of time that the noise level was exceeded for that percentage of time. For example, the L50 of at the corner of 65th and France was 68.8 dBA, means that for 50 % of the time the noise level was above 68.8 d BA. Results are as shown below: Wft & , 1. `76.0 74.1, 72.9 67.0 58.4 57.2 55.2 dBA 2. 61.5 '59.5 58.5 55.6 53.1 52.7 52.2 3. 76.0 74.2 73.0 68.8 62.7 61.5 59.5 Only the noise level at location #2 is within the MPCA rules as expressed in Minnesota Rule 7030. The rules are as follows: Daytime (7:00 AM 10:00 PM): 60 dBA Nighttime (10:00 PM — 7:00 AM): 50 dBA I also verified the projected sound levels at the south property line of 6500 France due to the two RTU's that will be located on the roof. This sound level is calculated directly in a horizontal line from the RTU's;. or approximately 3 — 4 stories in the air. Sound levels on the ground would be somewhat lower because of shielding by the roof and parapet of the 6500 France building. My calculations of noise levels from the two RTU's corroborate those made earlier by the project mechanical engineer of 43 dBA at the closest property line to the South. The 43 dBA sound level at the property line is well within the daytime and nighttime MPCA rules. Given that the measured L50 is 55.6 dBA at that location, .and that the spectrum from the BTU's will be similar to that of the traffic noise, the RTU's will not add at all to the noise levels,. currently on the site. Steven Kvernstoen A07 AV bi ` t . C�' man ce Association, TnCO 6566 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 925 -2598 July S2, 2012 City, of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Mount Development Company Application (6500 -France Avenue South and 4005 West 65th Street) City Council Agenda Item No. VI.B (July 17,'2012) Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is submitted for the purpose of commenting upon the application of Mount Development Company ( "Applicant") for adoption -of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan related to the Applicant's proposal to build, in two phases, a six - story, 81 -foot tall, 102,406 square foot medical office /retail building with a detached 5 -level parking ramp ( "Proposed Building "). (The Applicant refers to the project as "Edina Medical Plaza ".) The Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending approval of the application at its meeting on June 27, 2012. The application is -now pending before the City Council. See Resolution Nos. 2012 -94 and 2012 -95. Point of France. Association, Inc., is a nonprofit corporation consisting of the owners of condominium units: in Point of France Condominiums ("POF"), located at 6566 ' France Avenue South, immediately south of the Proposed Building. POF was,built in 1976 and includes. 140 residential units: � IV is governed by a board .of directors composed 'of seven members. This letter, submitted in' behalf of the Board, reflects .the views of -the Board and of many POF owner /residents who attended an informational meeting with representatives of the Applicant on June 14 and board meetings on June 20 and June 28 and have otherwise'made their views known to the Board. POF does not now oppose Phase I of the Proposed Building, which contemplates the immediate construction of a four -story office building with a three -level parking ramp. POF does, however, oppose Phase II, which would allow the future addition of ,two stories on the office building and two levels on the parking ramp. Upon completion of Phase 11, the floor area of the Proposed Building would be 102,406 square feet. The Staff Report to the Planning Commission states that the size of the site is 2.34 acres (p. 2), and the square footage equivalent of 2.34 acres is 101,930 square feet (43,560 square feet per acre). The ratio of floor area to site size (FAR) upon completion of Phase II would therefore be 102,406/101,930, or 100.47 %. This City of Edina Planning Department July. 12, 2012 Page 2 ratio is approximately twice the 50% ratio permitted by the city standard and is 18% greater than the 85 % ratio of Twin Cities Orthopedics (TCO) (Staff Report, p. 4), a recently built medical office building located across 65th Street from the Proposed Building. In our opinion the FAR ratio of the Proposed Building should be less -- rather than more - -than the TCO ratio because the Proposed Building, unlike TCO, will. not be adjacent to a highway. The height of the Proposed Building upon completion of Phase II would be 81 feet (88 feet with mechanical equipment) and six stories.. This height would greatly exceed that permitted by the city standard (48 feet or four stories, whichever is less) - -about 69% greater than the standard in feet and 50% in stories. With one exception, none of the structures currently located on this block of West 65th Street exceeds four stories/levels. (The exception is the TCO parking ramp, which is five levels.) It is also noteworthy that, while the drawings show that adjacent trees will soften the exposure of the four Phase I stories, they will do nothing to cover the two additional Phase 11 stories from the view of neighbors and passersby. Phase II will thus stand out from the other structures on the block and detract from the ambience of the block.. We expect the Applicant to contend that Phase II is necessary for the Proposed Building to be financially viable. It is not possible to determine the validity of this contention with certainty because we have not seen the Applicant's. financial projections. However, the time frame for Phase II projected by the Applicant suggests that Phase II is not financially necessary. The Applicant informed us in early June that it has no fixed time frame for Phase II, and that construction of Phase II could occur at any time during the next three to ten years. One would expect that, if Phase II were a necessity, the projected time frame would be much narrower. Its breadth suggests that the prospect of Phase H is actually a bonus if and when market conditions allow rather than a necessity. In conclusion, POF does not oppose, Phase I of the Proposed Building but does oppose Phase II on the ground Oat, the additional two stories will detract from the general character .and. appearance of the block. In addition, since financial .projections have not been disclosed and the projected development time frame is very broad, we question any contention of the Applicant that Phase II is financially necessary. Very truly yours, Jo Windhorst Director /Legal Chair I 1� - I Y O e • rN�Ri'ORP� • 1888 REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. VI. C. From: Scott Neal City Manager ® Action Discussion Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING WITH DRIVE FOR THE HIVE, LLC (HORNETS NEST PROJECT) ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is being asked to grant a number of approvals for the proposed Hornets Nest Project at Braemar Ice Arena. The approvals are as follows: • Conduct a public hearing on the proposed Hornets Nest Agreement • Approve the proposed Hornets Nest Agreement • Conditionally approve a Facility Use Agreement for Braemar Ice Arena with the Edina School District • Approve Hornets Nest commercial tenant lease with Velocity Hockey • Approve Hornets Nest commercial tenant lease with General Sports • Award construction contract(s) for the Hornets Nest Project INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Hornets Nest Project is an expansion two -story expansion to Braemar Ice Arena. The expansion area will be north of the West Arena and will be connected to the West Arena through a short corridor. The purpose of the project is to create new locker rooms and associated space for the boys and girls hockey teams for Edina High School. The group advocating for the Hornets Nest Project is called Drive For The Hive ( "Drive "), a local non - profit corporation established specifically to raise private gifts to donate to the City for the project and to assist the City in managing the construction of the project itself. Drive's project finance goal from the start was to create an innovative project finance strategy that would minimize the use of public funds for construction. The strategy to achieve this project finance goal was to create five new funding streams: • incorporating leasable commercial space into the project and then dedicating the rental income from that space to the project; and, • a $20 /participant surcharge on participants in the Edina Hockey Association and the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club; and, • a modest increase to the School District's hourly ice rental costs; and, • revenue from the sale of naming rights within the locker room; and, • private philanthropic gifts. The City's official consideration of the Hornets Nest Project started at a Special Park Board meeting on January 23, 2012. At that special meeting, the Park Board received a comprehensive presentation from Drive representatives regarding their proposed project. At the end of the special meeting, the Board resolved that it was sufficiently interested in the proposal that it wanted to establish a Working Group to investigate the proposal in more detail. The Board's request to create the Hornets Nest Working Group was approved as a Consent Agenda item by the City Council on February 21, 2012. The Working Group met regularly and researched the project and its innovative project finance strategy. The Working Group advanced its recommendation to the Park Board on April 10, 2012. The Park Board unanimously approved the following recommendation: "Mr. Keprios stated that staff is recommending Park Board move forward with this project in concept to the City Council with some contingencies; however, not everything is in concrete at this point. He noted that it would be contingent upon 25% of the project ($752,367.67) be covered through private donations. The recommendation would also be contingent upon getting a commitment from the EHA and Edina Figure Skating Club to commit to a $20.00 surcharge on a per player basis per year for the life of the bonds and this would be consistent with what was done when they first built the West Arena. The last contingency would be that the City Council and School Board would have to agree on an ice rental surcharge fee needed to cover the operating expenses. He indicated that is not something that staff could just literally impose so don't consider that a given; however, the working group put approximately $12,000 in their recommendation. Mr. Keprios commented that lastly he thinks it would be fair to propose to the City Council that before they were to embark on something like this they would want ten year lease agreements from the two vendors that would be leasing the space on the upper level." The Park Board's recommendation was considered by the City Council on May 1. Representatives from Drive also attended the May 1 City Council meeting to share their presentation about the proposed project. After considerable discussion, the Council unanimously approved the following motion: "Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving Hornets' Nest concept subject to: 1. The project must receive all required municipal land use regulatory approvals from the City 2. Drive for the Hive organization entering into memorandum of understanding approved by the City Council that formally established respective roles and responsibilities of both parties to accomplish this project 3. Vendors, School District, and pertinent sports organizations must enter into agreements acceptable to the City relative to lease or use of the facility, or portions thereof 4. Drive for the Hive must raise $739,394.83 in private donations 5. Vendors for the dry-land training facility and the sporting goods retail store must commit to a minimum ten -year lease 6. The Edina School Board of Education must agree to an additional ice rental surcharge and restructuring to the spectator fee distribution for High School hockey games at Braemar Arena to help cover locker room operating expenses 7. The Edina Hockey Association must agree to a $20 per player per year surcharge for a 20 -year period (the life of the bonds) 8. The Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club must agree to a $20 per player per year surcharge for a 20 -year period (the life of the bonds)" Since the Council's May 1 meeting, City staff and the City Attorney have been working in good faith with the representatives from Drive to fulfill the Council's contingencies. The City and Drive have been able to accomplish the following: 1. At the time of the Council's May 1 action, it was believed by City staff that land use regulatory changes were going to be required for this project. After further consideration, however, it was determined that no pre - project municipal land use regulatory approvals required for the project. 2. City staff and Drive have reached a tentative agreement (formerly known as the Memorandum of Understanding) defining the respective organizations' roles and responsibilities for the project. 3. City staff and School District staff have reached an agreement on a new Facilities Use Agreement for Braemar Sports Facility that describes in detail the rights, responsibilities and financial relationship between the parties -at Braemar Ice Arena. 4. Drive has raised a substantial amount of money for the project from the sale of naming rights within the locker room area and from solicitation of cash gifts. At the time of this memorandum, I do not know if they have reached the $750,000 threshold. Drive representatives can tell us their total cash fund raising at the July 17 Council meeting. 5. Tenants for the Hornets Nest commercial space have both executed ten year leases. 6. The Edina School Board has not yet approved the newly proposed Facilities Use Agreement. It is scheduled to be on their July 23 meeting agenda for review and approval. 7. The Edina Hockey Association has approved a $20 /player surcharge for 20 years. 8. The Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club has also approved a $20 /participant surcharge for 20 years. E.J. Anderson from Drive coordinated the production of plans and specifications for the project. He brought architect Nick Sperides of SRa Architects into the project. Mr. Sperides worked closely with Drive, City and School District representatives on the project design all the way through the production of the plans and specifications for the bid packages. The bid opening for the project occurred on Thursday, July 12. The apparent low bidder for the project was RJM Construction at $3,647,000. The project estimate was $3,200,000. A team of City staff, architects and Drive representatives will meet with the representatives from RJM on Friday, July 13 to discuss their bid proposal to determine why it was 14% higher than our estimate. I will share the results of that information with the Council. ISSUES FOR THE COUNCIL TO CONSIDER: 1. The proposed debt financing of the project has a 20 year term. The proposed terms of the commercial tenant leases are 10 years with options for renewal. The proposed Facilities Use Agreement with the School District has a 5 year term. The fact that terms of the revenue sources don't match up is not a reason for concern, but it is something to note for the future. 2. Approval of the Hornets Nest Project will require the City to also construct additional ADA- related improvements which are estimated to cost $500,000. In order to fund a currently unprogrammed improvement of this size at the Arena, we will need to make adjustments in the City's CIP. 3. If Drive is not able to produce its required cash contribution to the project ($750,000) by July 17, is the Council comfortable awarding the project anyway or would the Council defer action on the award of the construction contract until the full $750,000 has been transferred to the City? 4. How much branding /marketing is the City willing to allow in exchange for cash contributions to the project? 5. 100% of the lease revenue from the commercial tenant leases is dedicated toward the new debt service obligations created for the City by the project. The commercial tenant leases are not personally guaranteed by the lessees. In the case of a default or non - payment, the City would need to make debt service payments without the benefit of the lease revenue. This is a new risk for the City. 6. The low bidder — RJM Construction — submitted a bid that is 14% higher than our estimate. Is the Council willing to proceed with the project on this basis? SUMMARY: The Hornets Nest Project has been reviewed and endorsed by the Park Board. It has been reviewed and endorsed by the multiple representatives of the local hockey community. The volunteers from Drive For The Hive have worked hard to put together a project that is creative and worthy of historic Braemar Arena. The project's innovative financing plan provides non - property tax sources of revenue to the construction of the project, but also exposes the City to an undefined element of risk of new debt service obligation if the project's commercial tenants are unsuccessful. The Council is charged with weighing the risks and benefits of the project. My recommendation to the Council is if you are comfortable your May 1 conditions have been fulfilled, you should grant the necessary approvals and award the construction contract. AGREEMENT Agreement entered this day of , 2012 by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and the Drive for the Hive, Inc. In consideration of their mutual covenants, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Hornets Nest Project ( "project ") will be an addition to the north side of the West Arena of Braemar Arena. The scope of the project shall be established by the City Council, but will be materially similar to the scope of the project as presented to the City Council at their May 1, 2012 by representatives of the Drive For The Hive. 2. The project will be developed and financed through a public - private partnership between the City of Edina ( "City ") and the Drive for the Hive, Inc. ( "Drive "). The estimated cost of the project is $3,000,000. "Project costs" include architectural and engineering fees, site preparation, permits, construction costs, utilities, legal, insurance, landscaping and all other costs associated with the project. The project shall be designed and constructed as a municipally owned public facility under the standards, rules and laws of the State of Minnesota. 3. Drive and City will share the project cost. Drive will contribute $750,000 in privately donated cash and 25% of any project cost over the estimated project cost of $3,000,000. The City will contribute $2,250,000 and 75% of any project cost over the estimated project cost of $3,000,000. Drive's $750,000 cash contribution to the project is exclusive of any in -kind contributions Drive may also make to the project, including, but not limited to, serving as the project's construction manager and rental leasing agent. 4. Drive will provide a Construction manager acceptable to the City for the project using AIA Document 801 CMa - 1992 as may be amended by the parties. The construction manager will not be compensated by the City and the City will not reimburse the construction manager for any costs. 5. The project will be designed by an architect selected and contracted to the City. The City will consult with Drive regarding the selection of the architect. The City will negotiate a contract fee for service. The City will execute the contract with the architect upon receipt of the total amount of the contract fee from Drive. The amount contributed by Drive for this cost will be applied to their overall cost share of $750,000. 6. The architect will be advised by a design team consisting of members of Drive and the City. Upon completion of the design drawings and plans and specifications, the project plans will be presented to the City Council for approval. Upon Council approval, but prior to the award of construction contracts, Drive must provide the balance of its contribution to the City. 7. The City's execution of construction contracts for the project will be conditioned on all of the following actions being accomplished to the satisfaction of the City Manager: Doc. #165375 v.1 RNK: 7/11/2012 The City has received the full cash contribution of $750,000 from Drive. b. _ The City and School District have approved an agreement that describes the terms of the School District's lease of the Hornets Nest locker room facilities and the terms of their financial support of the project. C. The City and the Edina Hockey Association and the Braemar City of Lakes Figuring Skating Club have approved agreements which bind their clubs to implement an annual $20 per participant surcharge to support the annual debt service cost of the project's debt financing until the bonds issued for the financing of the project are retired. Leases for the rentable commercial space have been executed. 8. Drive will be the City's initial property leasing agent for the rentable commercial space in the project. Drive will be responsible for soliciting Letters of Interest (1-01's) from potential tenants. Drive will present the 1-01's to a committee consisting of representatives of Drive, City, Edina Hockey Association, Edina School District and the Braemar City of Lakes Figuring Skating Club who will review and recommend to the City Manager which tenants the City will negotiate final leases agreements with. The City Manager, or his designee, shall negotiate the tenant leases. The City Council must approve the final lease agreements. 9. The City will secure all necessary governmental permits, licenses, surveys, soil tests, and other entitlements necessary for the construction and operation of the project. 10. The City reserves all naming rights for the project, provided it may sell or lease those rights at its sole discretion, as Fong as the City uses the funds for maintenance and upkeep of the Braemar Ice Arena, including, but not limited to, the project. 11. The City will control all vending machine rights in the Braemar Ice Arena including the project and any other additions to the arena. 12. The City will control all branding decisions in the project. Drive may, however, sell the rights to name interior space in the locker rooms as part of its fund raising campaign if it is consistent with the City's donation policy. 13. The City will control all exterior and interior signage for the project. 14. The City reserves the right to cancel the project for any reason prior to the award of construction contracts, including, but not limited to, any of the following: Drive does not acquire a sufficient level of private cash donations. The School District does agree to lease the proposed Hornets Nest locker rooms. The Edina Hockey Association does not agree to impose an annual player surcharge agreement. Leases for the rentable commercial space have not been executed. Doc. #165375 v.1 RNK: 7/11/2012 e. The Braemar City of Lakes Figuring Skating Club does not agree to an annual participant surcharge agreement. f. Project costs exceed the project budget. g. Excessive environmental damage 15. Any funds donate by Drive to the City for the Project not expended by the City for Project Costs will be returned to Drive. CITY OF EDINA BY: James Hovland Its Mayor BY: Scott Neal Its City Manager DRIVE FOR THE HIVE, INC. BY: Doc. #165375 v.1 3 RNK: 7/11/2012 Its BY: Its Doc. #165375 v.1 3 RNK: 7/11/2012 r 165215v1 FACILITY USE AGREEMENT BRAEMAR SPORTS FACILITY between CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 (EDINA), MINNESOTA Dated 2012 FACILITY USE AGREEMENT THIS FACILITY USE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement ") made this day of , 2012 by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City "), and INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 (EDINA), MINNESOTA, an independent school district created and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "District "). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City and the District have determined that it is in the best interests of the residents of the City and the District to undertake, in a cooperative fashion, the construction of four new locker rooms (the "Locker Rooms ") at the Braemar Sports Facility Hornet's Nest Addition; and WHEREAS, the City and the District desire to maximize the use of the Locker Rooms by all residents of the City and the District; and WHEREAS, this Agreement sets forth the rights and obligations of the City and the District relating to the joint use of the Locker Rooms; and WHEREAS, the City and the District have authority to enter into this Agreement and to take all actions required of it hereby, and have taken all actions necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of this Agreement. WITNESSETH THAT, in the joint and mutual exercise of their powers, and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto recite and agree as follows: ARTICLE I Joint Use 1.01. Joint Use. The City and the District shall jointly use the Locker Rooms in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. 1.02. Term. This Agreement shall be for a term of five 5 thirty years commencing on the date of substantial completion of the Locker Rooms. 1.03. Use and Scheduling. a. The City shall be responsible for allowing access to the Locker Rooms. The District shall have exclusive use of the Locker Rooms from November 1 through March 31. The City shall have exclusive use of the Locker Rooms at all other times. 165215v1 b. In order to maximize the use of the Locker Rooms, the City and the District agree that the other party may schedule use of the Locker Rooms during the other party's exclusive use period, with the other party's consent. Such consent may not be unreasonably withheld. If it is deemed necessary to have a City custodian present in the Locker Rooms in an overtime capacity during a City- sponsored event, the District will be billed for such time. 1.04. Parking and Roads. The City wilt permit the District, and its employees, agents and invitees to use the internal roadway systems and parking lots for access to the Locker Rooms, and to use the parking lots of the City adjacent to the Locker Rooms for parking purposes, subject to the City's reasonable rules and regulations. 1.05. Meeting. The City and the District shall meet at least annually to review the use of the Locker Rooms. 1.06. Alcohol and Tobacco Policy. The Locker Rooms shall be treated as "school ground" as contemplated by the alcohol control provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 624.701; that the District's alcohol and tobacco policies and regulations, and any additions or amendments thereto, shall apply to the Locker Rooms; that the area should be appropriately posted; and that the City shall withhold access from groups for alcohol or tobacco violations. ARTICLE II Ownership, Operation, and Maintenance of Locker Rooms 2.01. Ownership. The City will be the owner of the Locker Rooms, subject to the rights and obligations of the parties set forth in this Agreement and in the Joint Powers Agreement. 2.02. Set -up and Access. The City will ensure the Locker Rooms are unlocked and accessible for all scheduled uses. With the intent to minimize maintenance, and access expenses, whenever possible, the District may, with the consent of the City assume the responsibilities of minimal maintenance, and access on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, and not rely on City staff for those job functions. The City, however; agrees to provide those functions on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays when the District is unable to assume those responsibilities. 2.03. Maintenance and Upkeep. The City will be responsible for all maintenance, repairs, replacement and upkeep of the Locker Rooms necessary to keep the Locker Rooms in good repair and clean condition. The City at its expense shall also maintain the internal roadway systems, parking areas, associated common areas and HVAC system used in connection with the Locker Rooms, including snow plowing, to the same standards as provided by the City to other City buildings. The City shall determine standards of maintenance. The District will reimburse the City. 2.04. Operating and Utilities Costs. The City will provide for all electric, heat, phone, water, sewer, trash removal and other utilities, janitorial services and other services for the 1652150 2 :. Locker Rooms, the costs of which will be paid by the District, for the months of November 1" through March 31 St; as provided in Section 3.02 hereof. The City will maintain reasonable temperatures in the Locker Rooms during the District's use time; provided, the City; is._not required to provide air conditioning. 2.05. Insurance. The City will be responsible to insure the Locker. Rooms, fixtures, and furnishings therein against loss or damage by fire and loss or damage by such other risks and in such amounts, with such deductible provisions, in accordance with prevailing community standards and the City shall carry and maintain, and pay timely the premiums for, with respect to the Locker Rooms, fixtures and furnishings therein, direct damage insurance covering all risks of loss on,a replacement cost,basis in an amount equivalent.to the full insurable value thereof. 5", ° Each party will obtain and maintain duringthe ferm of this Agreement a comprehensive liability insurance policy in at least the amounts specified as to the extent of liability:under Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04. The District will be named as an additional insured on the City's policy and the City will be' named an additional insured on the District's policy. Each party, shall furnish to the other party a certificate of insurance documenting the required coverage. 2.06. Damage or Destruction. Upon any damage or destruction of any of the Locker Rooms.by fire or other casualty, the City shall within one hundred twenty (120) days after such damage or destruction, commence the process required to repair, reconstruct and restore the damaged Locker Rooms to substantially the same condition or utility value.as existed prior to the event causing such damage or destruction and shall diligently pursue such repair, reconstruction and restoration. ARTICLE III Charge for Use of the Locker Rooms and ice time 3.01 Ticket Sales. The District will pay the City In 58°�e- •of.the revenue from ticket sales from District hockey games at the Braemar arena. The revenue due the .City from. the sales of tickets, shall .be paid the City following each game 3.02. User;Fees: The City will charge the District ice time%user fees. The hourly rate for District- sponsored activity ice time uses shall be the same rate charged by the City to other users, adjusted to include the costs set forth in Sections 2.03, 2.04, and 2.05. 3.03. Payments by Cily, to District. The City will invoice the District semiannually for the charges in Section 3.02 at the end.of December and: at the end of the. District's exclusive use period. The billing at the end of the exclusive use period will be; adjusted to reflect actual ice time usage in the prior 12 months. The District will pay the invoice within 35 days of receipt of the invoice. 3.04. Estimated Fees 2012 -2013 Season. The Parties estimate that the following fees will be due the City from the District pursuant to this Agreement for the 2012 -2013 season: 165215v1 Home Games — 50/50 Gate split Ice Costs — Estimated for 2012 -2013 Practices - (250 hours g $200 per hour) - $50,000 Games — (90 hours g $200 per hour) $18,000 Locker Rooms — Estimated $11,432.96 Total Annual Expenses — $79,432.96 Total Hours Purchased - 340 Cost per hour - $233.62 ARTICLE IV Indemnification 4.01. Each party is responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law govern the parties' liability. To the full extent permitted by law, this Agreement is intended to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the parties that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. la (a); provided further that for purposes of that statute, each party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other party. In addition to the foregoing, northing herein shall be construed to waive or limit any immunity from, or limitation on, liability available to either party, whether set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or otherwise. ARTICLE V Dispute Resolution 5.01. Negotiation. If a dispute arises between the City and the District regarding this Agreement or the operation or maintenance of the Locker Rooms, the District Superintendent and the City Manager, or their designees, must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. 5.02. Mediation and Arbitration. If the City and the District have not negotiated a resolution of the dispute within 30 days after this meeting, the parties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. If a mediator is not used or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, the dispute will be submitted to binding arbitration before a panel of three arbitrators in accordance with the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association, except that disputes involving a monetary'dispute in an amount less than $25,000 will be submitted to a single arbitrator. The parties will equally share the costs of conducting any mediation or arbitration, excluding each party's cost for preparation of its own case. 5.03. Specific Performance. In addition to the dispute resolution mechanisms contained in this section, each party may seek specific performance of the other party's obligations under this agreement. 165215v1 4 ARTICLE VI Miscellaneous 6.01. Relationship of Parties. The City and the District agree that it is their intention hereby to create only the relationships of licensor and licensee, and no provision hereof, or act of either party hereunder, shall ever be construed as creating the relationship of lessor and lessee, principal and agent, or a partnership, joint venture or enterprise between the parties hereto. ARTICLE VII Administrative Provisions 7.01. Rights Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the City and the District under this Agreement, whether provided by law or by this Agreement, shall be cumulative, and the exercise by either party of any one or more of such remedies shall not preclude the exercise by such party, at the same or different times, of any other remedy for the same default or breach or of any of its remedies for any other default or breach of the party. No waiver made by either such party with respect to the performance or the manner or time thereof, of any obligation under this Agreement, shall be considered a waiver with respect to the particular obligation of the other party or a condition to its own obligation beyond those expressly waived in writing and to the extent thereof, or a waiver in any respect in regard to any other rights of the party making the waiver of any obligations of the other party. Delay by a party hereto instituting or prosecuting any cause of action or claim hereunder shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights hereunder. 7.02. Notices. All notices, certificates or other communications required to be given to the City and the Developer hereunder shall be sufficiently given and shall be deemed given when delivered or deposited in the United States mail in registered or certified form with postage fully prepaid and addressed as follows: If to the City: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1330 Attn: City Manager If to the District: Independent School District No. 273 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Superintendent The City and the District, by notice given hereunder, may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices; certificates or other communications should be sent. 7.03. Amendments, Changes and Modifications: This Agreement may be amended or any of its terms modified only by written amendment as mutually agreed upon authorized and executed by the City and the District. 165215v1 7.04. Assignment. The City and the District may not assign their rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. 7.05. Binding Effect. ffect. All of the covenants, conditions and agreements herein contained shall extend to, be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective permitted successors and assigns. 7.06. Severability. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, 7.07. Execution Counterparts. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 7.08. Governing Law. This Agreement shall in all respects be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 7.09. Captions. The captions or headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and in no way define, limit or describe the scope of intent of any provisions or sections of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and the District have subscribed their names as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA Lo And: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland Its Mayor Scott Neal Its City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2012 by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 165215v1 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and the District have subscribed their names as of the day and year first above written. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 (EDINA), MINNESOTA By: Its Chairperson And Its Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2012 by and , respectively, the Chairperson of the School Board and the Clerk of the School Board of Independent. School District No. 273, a Minnesota independent school district, on behalf of the school district and pursuant to the authority granted by its School Board. Notary Public This Instrument was Drafted by: CAMPBELL KNUTSON P.A. 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 317 Eagan, MN 55121 651- 452 -5000 [RNK] r rk . owe)Ll�� o CoRPORI+TE� o reee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VIII. A. and VIII. B. From: Scott Neal City Manager, N Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: July 17, 2012 Subject: Ordinance 2012 -13 Repealing Cable Television Regulator Ordinance and Ordinance 2012 -14 Granting A Cable Television Franchise To Comcast ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance 2012 -13 and Ordinance 2012 -14. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Edina is a member of the Southwest Cable Commission. The Commission exists to provide a local regulatory authority to manage the City's cable television franchise. The Commission and Comcast recently reached an agreement on a renewal of Comcast's franchise to provide cable television services within the cities of the Commission, which includes Hopkins, Eden Prairie, Richfield, Minnetonka and Edina. The Commission has recommended that all five cities approve the new franchise agreement. The two items on the Council's July 17 meeting agenda will accomplish that approval by repealing the:current cable television ordinance (Ordinance 2012 -13) and by granting a new franchise to Comcast (Ordinance 2012 -14). Attached to this memorandum is supporting documentation prepared by the legal counsel /administrator of the Commission, Mr. Brian Grogan. Mr. Grogan will attend the July 17 Council meeting to make a presentation to the Council on these two ordinances and to answer your questions. Moss & Barnett A Professional Association VIA EMAIL June 22, 2012 Mr. Scott Neal Mr. Rick Getschow City Manager. City Manager 4801 West 50th Street 8080 Mitchell Road Edina; MN 55424 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Mr. Jim A. Genellie Ms. Patty Latham Assistant City Manager IT Manager 1010 1st Street South 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Hopkins; MN 55343 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Mr. Steve Devich City Manager 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 Re: Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Dear Scott, Rick, Jim, Patty and Steve: Enclosed please find a packet of documents which I have prepared for your upcoming meeting City council meetings where your council will consider adoption of the Cable Television Franchise Ordinance. I have listed all of the enclosures below. 1. Staff Memo to the Member Cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission; 2. Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Resolution 2012 -1- Recommendation Regarding the Adoption of a Cable Franchise to Comcast; 3. Side letter from Comcast to the Commission; 4. Annual Franchise and PEG Fee chart (Optional if you believe it would be helpful to your Council); and 5. Twin Cities Metro Area Cable PEG Fee Comparison chart (Optional). Under a separate email to be sent in 1 -2 days, each of you will receive the following: 1. Cable Television Franchise Ordinance tailored to your city; 2. Summary of Ordinance for Publication; and 3. Ordinance Repealing the City's Cable Television Regulatory Ordinance. After you and your city attorney have had a chance to review these documents please let me know of any questions or comments. Very truly yours, Brian T. Grogan Attorney At Law P: (612) 877 -5340 GroganB @moss- barnett.com BTG /tlh/2024876v1 _ gp lI *�. -411 tl' �. � • R? M r�.6�..9r' iA 'j 7F'.+.i�.t, 1�. rrw.-42 ::..%'2'.' 1 i:. .. "\. 1 � .. :Z . ' , 4 . l_ ir ..i Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Memorandum To: Member Cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission From: Brian T. Grogan Date: June 22, 2012 Re: Cable Television Franchise Ordinance Background The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission C'Commission'l consists of the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield, Minnesota ("Member Cities'j. The Commission administers and enforces the cable franchises on behalf of its Member Cities. On or about January 1, 1997, each of the Member Cities granted a Cable Television Franchise to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc ("Existing Franchise'. At that same time the Member Cities each adopted a Cable Television Regulatory Ordinance ("Regulatory Ordinance') to be incorporated into the City Code of each Member City. In 2000, the Commission and Member Cities approved a transfer of the Existing Franchise to Time Warner, Inc. In June of 2005, Time Warner transferred the Existing Franchise to Comcast Communications (" Comcast'j. Comcast currently operates the cable systems in each of the Member Cities under authority granted in the Existing Franchise. The initial term of the Existing Franchise ran for fifteen years and was extended by the Member Cities to now expire on July 31, 2012. In 2009 Comcast requested renewal of the Existing Franchise and the Commission has since been engaged in informal renewal negotiations with Comcast in an effort to reach mutually acceptable terms for a new franchise. In response to Comcast's request for franchise renewal, in 2010 the Commission retained an outside consultant to draft a Needs Assessment Report outlining the future cable - related needs and interests of the Member Cities for the next franchise term. The Commission also prepared a draft franchise which incorporated the findings of the Needs Assessment. The draft franchise incorporated most of the key provisions of the Member Cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission June 22, 2012 Page 2 Regulatory Ordinance in an effort to consolidate all cable regulations in a single franchise with Comcast. Commission Goals The Commission's primary goals during renewal negotiations were: 1. Incorporate the provisions of the Regulatory.Ordinance into a renewed franchise - resulting in one governing document addressing cable regulations in each Member City. 2. Ensure that the provision of each Member City's Code is incorporated into the renewed franchise so that the same right -of -way (ROW) regulations governing all right- of-way users will apply to Comcast. 3. Streamline regulation in the Comcast Franchise — eliminated unnecessary provisions that are no longer applicable to cable providers in today's regulatory environment. 4. Address digital migration of local government and educational channels. 5. Increase the level of capital support for local channels. 6. Maintain the 5% franchise fee as consideration for use of the City's ROW. 7. Eliminate the Comcast public access studio in Eden Prairie due to limited use by residents and cable subscribers and redirect the resources to other local programming options to be determined by the Member Cities. 8. Improve customer service standards applicable to Comcast and enforceable by the Commission and the Member Cities. 9. Renew, for a 10 year. term. 10. Adopt enforcement procedures and security to ensure compliance. Negotiation Process' Throughout 2011 and the first half of 2012 representatives of Comcast and the Commission negotiated the terms of, a new model Cable Television Franchise Ordinance ("Model Franchise "). The Model Franchise combines into a.single document the provisions of the Existing Franchise and the Regulatory Ordinance. The Model Franchise is the result of extensive negotiations between the Commission and Comcast and, as is the case of many negotiations, certain concessions were made by both Comcast and the Commission in an effort to reach mutually acceptable language for a ten year franchise.. On May 30, 2012 the Commission adopted Resolution 2012 -1 (attached hereto) recommending that the Model Franchise be adopted by each Member City. Member Cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission June 22, 2012 Page 3 All five Member Cities are taking action on the Model Franchise simultaneously. Any proposed revisions from one of the Member Cities may require the Commission to seek agreement not only from Comcast but also from the other four Member Cities which may have already taken action to adopt the Model Franchise. This point is raised not to suggest that further revisions are impossible, but to emphasize the complexity of the approval process and the steps which must be undertaken to complete the approval process prior to the expiration of the existing extension resolutions - July 31, 2012. Final Results of Franchise Negotiations 1997 2012 5% Franchise fee Same 5% fee "Gross Revenue" definition Stronger definition No PEG capital support fee Comcast studio closed Comcast run studio $.60 - $.65 /sub /mo PEG Fee paid to City - $.25 /sub /mo paid to Comcast to support studio 15 year term 10 year term 4 PEG channels 3 PEG channels Digital migration addressed Option for 1 high definition channel Complementary drops at public Same + up to 3 digital boxes per site buildings Maintain fiber return feeds Obligation completed, will be maintained Performance bond $100,000 per City Security fund $10,000 per City — upon notice of violation Reporting /compliance Obligations from Regulatory Ordinance merged into franchise and strengthened ROW management Operator held to City Code provisions . Side Letter During renewal negotiations Comcast asked to pull two commitments out of the Model Franchise and place them in a side letter (see attached). This side letter has been included in this packet of documents for the City's review and consideration. If acceptable as drafted, Comcast will execute and forward a copy of the side letter to the Commission at the time of acceptance. End Of Memorandum 2010360v2 RESOLUTION NO. Q< r I), ` l RECOMMENDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF A CABLE FRANCHISE TO COMCAST OF ARKANSAS / FLORIDA / LOUISIANA I MINNESOTA / MISSISSIPPI I TENNESSEE, INC. Recitals 1. The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "Commission ") consists of the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield, Minnesota ( "Member Cities "). 2. The Commission administers and enforces cable franchises on behalf of its Member Cities. '3. Comcast of Arkansas / Florida / Louisiana / Minnesota / Mississippi / Tennessee, Inc. ( "Comcast ")currently operates a cable system in each of the Member Cities under cable television franchises granted on or about January 1, 1997 ( "Existing Franchises "). 4_. In 2009 Comcast contacted each of the Member Cities seeking renewal of the Existing Franchises. 6. The Commission's legal counsel, the law firm of Moss & Barnett, a Professional Association, assisted the Commission in conducting the franchise renewal process. 7. Extensive informal franchise renewal negotiations between Comcast and the Commission have been completed and a new model Cable Television Franchise Ordinance ( "Model Franchise ") has been finalized. 8. The Commission finds that the Model Franchise will benefit the Member Cities and will protect the rights and interests of residents and cable subscribers in each of the Member Cities. NOW THEREFORE, the Commission hereby resolves as follows: 1. The May 30, 2012 Model Franchise will protect the Member Cities and its residents and cable Subscribers regarding the provision of cable services by Comcast. 2: The Commission recommends that each Member City take action to adopt the Model Franchise. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of �.._ 2012. SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION O` Ron Case, Chair ATTEST: ¢.......� _µ 17 2005999v1 (to appear on Comcast letterhead) July _, 2012 Brian Grogan Attorney, SW Suburbs Cable Commission Moss & Barnett 4800 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Grogan: The purpose of this letter agreement is to set forth commitments between Comcast of Arkansas / Florida / Louisiana / Minnesota / Mississippi / Tennessee, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "Comcast ") and the Southwest Suburban Cable Communications Commission ( "Commission ") consisting of the cities of Edina, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield, Minnesota (hereinafter collectively the "Cities ") that are in addition to the obligations contained in the Franchise Agreement, to be adopted by the Cities and executed by Comcast to take effect on August 1, 2012 (hereinafter the "Franchise "). These items set forth herein: 1) have been negotiated in good faith and mutually agreed to by the parties as part of the informal franchise renewal process pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 546(h); 2) are provided by Comcast in consideration of the grant of the Franchise in each of the Cities; and 3) specifically relate to unique community needs that exist in the Cities. 1. Use of $200,000 PEG Capital Grant Comcast acknowledges and understands that some or all of $200,000 PEG Capital Grant provided for in the Franchise may be used to lease facilities to house Access operations, or to pay for installation, set up and training related to PEG equipment. Without determining whether these activities constitute "capital" or "operating" expenditures for franchise compliance purposes,. and subject to the Indemnity provisions of the Franchise, Comcast agrees not to pursue any action against the Commission or the Cities asserting that such expenditures violate Section 7.16(a) of the Franchise. 2. PEG Fee from residential multiple dwelling units With regard to the monthly PEG Fee referenced in Section 7.16(b) of the Franchise, Comcast will collect the PEG Fee from residential multiple dwelling units (i.e. apartments and condominiums) using an "equivalent billing unit - EBU" calculation as that teen is commonly defined under industry standards. The exact PEG Fee for multiple dwelling units may vary slightly from location to location based upon individually negotiated contracts. PEG Fees shall not be collected from free and/or complimentary service accounts. Mr. Brian Grogan Attorney, SW Suburbs Cable Commission July , 2012 Page Two The terms and conditions of this letter agreement are binding upon the Cities and Comcast and their successors and assigns. Enforcement of the terms of this. letter agreement shall be consistent with the enforcement procedures set forth in the Franchise. Comcast stipulates that a violation of these terms by Comcast may be considered by the Cities and the Commission as a violation of the Franchise and shall subject Comcast to all remedies available to the Cities and Commission under the Franchise. Acknowledged and agreed to this _ day of , 2012. Comcast of Arkansas / Florida / Louisiana / Minnesota / Mississippi / Tennessee, Inc. Its: Soutliwest Suburban Cable Communications Commission By: Brian T. Grogan Its: Legal Counsel 2018G55v2 ANNUAL FRANCHISE AND PEG FEES Based on 2011 Data - Assumes No Growth or Change in Subscriber Numbers 'Annual amount of franchise fee revenue collected under the existing franchise. ' Annual amount collected and retained by Comcast during the term of the existing franchise to support the PEG Access Studio in Eden Prairie. 3$.60 will be collected by Comcast and $.13 will be retained by Comcast during the 1 year transition period. °This amount will be collected annually and remitted (years 2 -5) to the City to be used for PEG capital purposes. 'This amount includes an inflation adjustment and will be collected annually (years 6 -30) and remitted to the City to be used for PEG capital purposes. 6This amount will be provided to the Commission no later than 8/31/2012 and will be used to address public and educational playback obligations assumed by the Commission and Member Cities resulting from the closing of the Eden Prairie studio. Commission Eden Prairie Edina Hopkins Minnetonka Richfield ANNUAL TOTAL Estimated # of Subs 15,500 14,300 4,900 14,600 7,900 57,200 Annual Franchise Fee (based on 2011 av )' $771,711 $717,504 $208,579 $714,697 $339,277 $2,751,769 Existing PEG Fee ($.25 /sub /mo)' $46,500 $42,900 $14,700 $43,800 $23,700 $171,600 Year 1 PEG Fee ($.47 /sub /mo)3 $87,420 $80,652 $27,636 $82,344 $44,556 $322,608 Years 2 -5 PEG Fee ($.60 /sub /mo)4 $111,600 $102,960 $35,280 $105,120 $56,880 $411,840 Years 6 -10 PEG Fee ($.65 /sub /mo)' j $120,900 $111,540 $38,220 $113,880 $61,620 $446,160 One -time PEG Grant -due August 1, 2012' $200,000 'Annual amount of franchise fee revenue collected under the existing franchise. ' Annual amount collected and retained by Comcast during the term of the existing franchise to support the PEG Access Studio in Eden Prairie. 3$.60 will be collected by Comcast and $.13 will be retained by Comcast during the 1 year transition period. °This amount will be collected annually and remitted (years 2 -5) to the City to be used for PEG capital purposes. 'This amount includes an inflation adjustment and will be collected annually (years 6 -30) and remitted to the City to be used for PEG capital purposes. 6This amount will be provided to the Commission no later than 8/31/2012 and will be used to address public and educational playback obligations assumed by the Commission and Member Cities resulting from the closing of the Eden Prairie studio. Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Cable PEG Fee Comparison 2012 (Revised Feb. 3, 2092) Compiled by Mark T. Moore, Cable Coordinator Apple, Farmington, and Rosemount Cable Commission Provider —+ Comcast Comcast Comcast Comcast Comcast Comcast Mediacom North Metro NW Suburbs Cbl. Central St. Lake Minnetonka Jurisdiction Fridley. Coon Rapids North Suburban Access Comm. Television Comm. (9 Croix Cbl. Cbl. Comm. (10 cities) Arden Hills, Falcon (6 Cities) Blaine, cities) Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Comm.1 (5 cities) (17 cities) Deephaven, Heights, Centerville, Park, Crystal, Stillwater, Oak. Excelsior, Lauderdale, Little Circle Pines, Golden Valley, Park Heights, Greenwood, Canada, Mounds Ham Lake, Lino Maple Grove, New Bayport Independence, View, New Lakes, and Hope, Osseo, and the Long Lake, Brighton, Spring Lake Plymouth, and Townships of Loretto, Maple North Oaks, Park_ Robbinsdale. Baytown and Plain, Medina, Roseville, St. Stillwater. Minnetonka Anthony, and Beach, Shoreview. Minnetrista, Orono, St. Bonifacius, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Victoria, and Woodland. # of Access 3' 6 8 6 7 4 5. Channels PEG Fee $0.49. The $2.26 The 3.49 The 3.06 The Cable $0.96 The Cable $1.40 Plus a $0.85 Franchise City also Commission does Commission Commission also_ substantial . Fees also go receives 100% receive a portion of also receives receives 1.00% of amount of the directly into of the the franchise fees; 75% of the the' Franchise Fee. Commission's the Cable TV Franchise Fee. each city pays a Franchise Fee Franchise enterprise pro rata share to support PEG Fees. fund. No based on their operations. general funds proportion of the are used for total franchise PEG. fees. ** NOTE:.Total channels # does NOT include MCN 6 because it is not administered by the Cities /Commissions. Page 1 of 3 Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Cable PEG Fee Comparison 2012 (Revised Feb. 3, 2012) Compiled by Mark T. Moore, Cable Coordinator Apple, Farmington, and Rosemount Cable Commission Provider -. Comcast Charter Comcast Comcast Comcast Comcast Mediacom Jurisdiction Shakopee Lakeville Soutwest South Ramsey/ . ' Minneapolis Savage Suburban Cable Washington Washington. Comm. (5 cities) County Suburban -Cable Edina, Hopkins, Telecommunic Commission -(12 Richfield, ations cities) Birchwood Minnetonka and Commission Village, Dellwood, Eden Prairie. (5 Cities) Grant," Lake._Elmo, Cottage Grove, Mahtomedi, Newport, St. Maplewood,, North Paul Park, St .Paul,_ Oakdale,. Woodbury, and Vadnais Heights, . Grey Cloud White Bear Lake, Island White Bear Township. Township; and Willerriie., `. # of Access 3 4 4 5 10 3 Channels ** PEG Fee $0.40 PEG $0.00 Cable $0.25 Comcast $1.00 The $1.00 The $0.50 The PEG Fees fund Access and the operates and Cable city also Fees and capital costs city's other staffs the access Commission provides 10 to Franchise Fees only while communication facilities, and also receives 20% financial comprise the salaries come s services are keeps the PEG 100% of the support for cable budget in a out of the funded by Fee to cover those Franchise Fee. PEG Access special fund. General Cable costs. There are from the No general levy Fund. Franchise likely some General Fund. monies are used Fees, which additional to operate the are maintained expenses for the access channels as a separate facilities but they or online fund. are not assessed streaming media. to the Commission. ** NOTE: Total channels # does NOT include MCN 6 because it is not administered by the Cities /Commissions. Page 2 of 3 Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Cable PEG Fee Comparison 2012 (Revised Feb. 3, 2012) Compiled by Mark T. Moore, Cable Coordinator Apple, Farmington, and Rosemount Cable Commission Provider —. Charter I Comcast Comcast Comcast Comcast Comcast Comcast Apple Valley. Burnsville _ N. Dakota Cty. , Jurisdiction Eagan Bloomington St. Paul St. Louis Park Farmington Cbl. Comm. Rosemount (7 cities) Inver Grove Heights, Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, and West St. Paul # of Access 4 6 6 7 7 6 5 Channels ** . PEG Fee $0.50 $1.89 The $2.04 The city $0.55 $1.64 The Cable $1.97 $1.12 The Cable Approx. 25 %, City /BCTV partner with Bloomington's Commission also Franchise TV department of the access partner with Thompson Communications receives 75% of Fees are used receives about budget ISD 191 for a Reuters who Division, which the Franchise Fee. to pay for staff, 80% of the comes from shared studio provide production includes PEG supplies, and franchise fees to the cities space in facilities at their Access, is a to some extent support PEG General Burnsville High main building in Special the equipment access. Fund. School. The exchange for a Revenue Fund used to cover School District negotiated number and receives the production. provides and of hours of video entire Franchise However, the maintains the services. The city Fee. They are vast majority space, the also shares use of not funded by of production City /BCTV a mobile the City's equipment is manages.the production with General Fund. paid "by PEG studio and Burnsville. grant dollars. equipment. ** NOTE: Total channels# does NOT include MCN 6 because it is not administered by the Cities /Commissions. Page 3 of 3 City of Edina, Minnesota Ordinance Granting a Cable Television Franchise to Comcast of Arkansas / Florida;/ Louisiana / Minnesota / Mississippi / Tennessee, Inc. June 25, 2012 .. 2033319v1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION1 DEFINITIONS ........................................................................ ............................... 1 SECTION2 FRANCHISE .......................................................................... ............................... 5 SECTION 3 OPERATION IN STREETS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY ........ ............................... 8 SECTION 4 REMOVAL OR ABANDONMENT OF SYSTEM ............. ............................... 12 SECTION 5 SYSTEM DESIGN AND CAPACITY ................................ ............................... 13 SECTION 6 PROGRAMMING AND SERVICES...., .............................................................. 16 SECTION 7 PUBLIC, EDUCATIONAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACCESS :................... 18 SECTION 8 REGULATORY PROVISIONS ............................::............. ............................... 24 SECTION9 BOND ............................................... ............................... ............... ..................... 25 SECTION10 SECURITY FUND .............................................................. ............................... 26 SECTION11 DEFAULT ............................................................................. .............................28 SECTION 12 FORECLOSURE AND RECEIVERSHIP .......................... ............................... 30 SECTION 13 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ....................................... ............................... 31 SECTION 14 CUSTOMER SERVICE POLICIES ................................... ............................... 32 SECTION 15 SUBSCRIBER PRACTICES ................................................ .............................38 SECTION 16 COMPENSATION AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS ..... ............................... 38 SECTION 17 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ................................... ............................... 42 EXHIBIT A FREE CABLE SERVICE TO PUBLIC BUILDINGS ....... ............................... A -1 EXHIBIT B EXISTING FIBER RETURN LINES ................................ ............................... B -1 EXHIBIT C FRANCHISE FEE PAYMENT WORKSHEET ................ ............................... C -1 8 2033319v1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RENEWING THE GRANT OF A FRANCHISE TO COMCAST OF ARKANSAS / FLORIDA / LOUISIANA / MINNESOTA / MISSISSIPPI / TENNESSEE, INC. TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A CABLE SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF EDINA; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS ACCOMPANYING THE GRANT OF FRANCHISE; PROVIDING FOR CITY REGULATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE CABLE SYSTEM; AND TERMINATING ORDINANCE NO. 1996 -5. RECITALS The City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City ") pursuant to applicable federal and state law, is authorized to grant one or more nonexclusive cable television franchises to construct, operate, maintain and reconstruct cable television systems within the City limits. Comcast of Arkansas / Florida / Louisiana / Minnesota / Mississippi / Tennessee, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "Grantee ") has operated a Cable System in the City, under a cable television franchise granted pursuant to Ordinance No. 1996 -5. Negotiations between Grantee and the City have been completed and the franchise renewal process followed in accordance with the guidelines established by the City Code, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238 and the Cable Act (47 U.S.C. 546). The City reviewed the legal, technical and financial qualifications of Grantee and, after a properly noticed public hearing, as determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its residents to renew the cable television franchise with Grantee. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF EDINA DOES ORDAIN that a franchise is hereby granted to Comcast of Arkansas / Florida / Louisiana / Minnesota / Mississippi / Tennessee, Inc., to operate and maintain a Cable System in the City upon the following terms and conditions: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Franchise, the following, terms, phrases, words, derivations and their derivations shall have the meanings given herein. When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future tense, words in the plural number include the singular number and words in the singular number include the plural number. In the event the meaning of any word or phrase not defined herein is uncertain, the definitions contained in applicable local, State or Federal law shall apply. "Access Channels" means any channel or portion of a channel utilized for public, educational or governmental programming. 20333190 "Affiliate" shall mean any Person controlling, controlled by or under common control of Grantee. "Applicable Laws" means any law, statute, charter, ordinance, rule, regulation, code, license, certificate, franchise, permit, writ, ruling, award, executive order, directive, requirement, injunction (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent), judgment, decree or other order issued, executed, entered or deemed applicable by any governmental authority of competent jurisdiction. "Basic Cable Service" means any service tier which includes the lawful retransmission of locartelevision broadcast. "Cable Act "means the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984,47 U.S.C. §§ 521 et seq.; as amended:by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, as further amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as further amended from time to time. "Cable Service" shall mean (a) the one -way transmission to Subscribers of (i) Video Programming or (ii) Other Programming Service, and b) Subscriber interaction, if any, which is required for the selection or use of such video programming or other programming service. For the` purposes of this definition, "video programming" is programming provided by, or generally considered comparable to programming provided by a television broadcast station; and, "other programming service" is information that a cable operator makes available to all Subscribers generally. "Cable System" or "System" shall have the meaning specified for "Cable System" in the Cable Act. Unless otherwise specified, it shall in this document refer to the Cable System constructed and operated in the City under this Franchise. "Channel" means a portion of the electromagnetic frequency spectrum which,is used in a Cable System and which is capable of delivering a television channel as defined by the FCC by regulation. "City" shall mean the City of Edina, a municipal corporation in the State of Minnesota. "City Code" means the Municipal Code of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as may be amended from time to time. "Commission" means the Southwest Suburban Cable Communications Commission consisting of the cities of Edina, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield, Minnesota. "Connection" means the attachment of the Drop to the television, set of the Subscriber. "Converter" means an electronic device, which converts signals to a frequency not susceptible to interference within the television receiver of a Subscriber, and by an appropriate Channel selector also permits a Subscriber to view all signals included in the Basic Cable Service tier delivered at designated converter dial locations. 20333190 "Council" shall mean the governing body of the City. "Day" unless otherwise specified shall mean a calendar day. "Drop" shall mean the cable that connects the Subscriber terminal to the nearest feeder cable of the cable. "Effective Date" shall mean August 1, 2012. "Expanded Basic Service" means the next tier of service above the Basic Cable Service tier excluding premium or pay - per -view services. "FCC" means the Federal Communications Commission, or a designated representative. "Franchise" shall mean the right granted by this Ordinance and conditioned as set forth herein. "Franchise Area" means the entire geographic area within the City as it is now constituted or may in the future be constituted. "Franchise Fee" shall mean the fee assessed by the City to Grantee, in consideration of Grantee's right to operate the Cable System within the City's Streets and rights of way, determined in amount as a percentage of Grantee's Gross Revenues and limited to the maximum percentage allowed for such assessment by federal law. The term Franchise Fee does not include the exceptions noted in 47 U.S.C. §542(g)(2)(A -E). "GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated and defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ( "FASB "), Emerging Issues Task Force ( "EITF ") and/or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ( "SEC "). "Gross Revenues" means any and all compensation in whatever form, from any source, directly or indirectly earned by Grantee or any Affiliate of Grantee or any other Person who would constitute a cable operator of the Cable System under the Cable Act, derived from the operation of the Cable System to provide Cable Service within the City. Gross Revenues include, by way of illustration and not limitation, monthly fees charged Subscribers for Cable Services including Basic Cable Service, any expanded tiers of Cable Service, optional premium or digital services; pay - per -view services; Pay Services, installation, disconnection, reconnection and change -in- service fees, Leased Access Channel fees, all Cable Service lease payments from the Cable System to provide Cable Services in the City, late fees and administrative fees, payments or other consideration received by Grantee from programmers for carriage of programming on the Cable System and accounted for as revenue under GAAP; revenues from rentals or sales of Converters or other Cable System equipment; advertising sales revenues booked in accordance with Applicable Law and GAAP; revenues from program guides and electronic guides, additional outlet fees, Franchise Fees required by this Franchise, revenue from Interactive Services to the extent they are considered Cable Services under Applicable Law; revenue from 20333190 the sale or carriage of other Cable Services, revenues from home shopping and other revenue - sharing arrangements. Grantee. agrees that Gross Revenues shall include all commissions paid to the National Cable Communications and Comcast Spotlight or their successors associated with sales of advertising on the Cable System within the City allocated according to this paragraph using total Cable Service Subscribers reached by the advertising. Copyright fees or other license fees paid by Grantee shall not be subtracted from Gross Revenues for purposes of calculating Franchise'Fees. Gross Revenues shall include revenue received by any entity other than Grantee where necessary to prevent evasion or avoidance of the obligation under this Franchise to pay the Franchise Fees. Gross Revenues shall not include any taxes on services furnished byGrahtee, which taxes are imposed directly•on a Subscriber or user by a city, county, state or other governmental unit, and collected by Grantee for such entity. The Franchise Fee' is not such a tax. Gross Revenues shall not include amounts which cannot be collected by Grantee and are identified as bad debt; provided that if amounts previously representing bad debt are collected, then those amounts shall be included in Gross Revenues for the period in which they are collected. Gross Revenues shall. not include payments for PEG Access capital support. The City acknowledges and accepts that Grantee shall maintain its books and records in accordance with GAAP. "Interactive Services" are those services provided to Subscribers whereby the Subscriber either (a) both receives information consisting of either television or other signal and transmits signals generated by the Subscriber or equipment under his/her control for the purpose of selecting what information shall be transmitted to the Subscriber or for any other purpose or (b) transmits signals to any other location for any purpose. "Minnesota Cable Communications Act" means the provisions of Minnesota law governing the requirements for a cable television franchise as set forth in Minn. Stat. § 238, et. seq., as amended. "Normal Business Hours" means those hours during which most similar businesses in City are open to serve customers. In all cases, "Normal Business Hours" must include some evening hours, at least one (1) night per week and/or some weekend hours. "Normal Operating Conditions." means those Service conditions which are within the control of Grantee. Those conditions which are not within the control of Grantee include, but are not limited to,.natural disasters, civil disturbances, power outages, telephone network outages, and severe or unusual weather conditions. Those conditions which are ordinarily within the control of Grantee include, but are not limited to, special promotions, pay - per -view events, rate increases, regular peak or seasonal demand periods, and maintenance or upgrade of the Cable System. "Pay Service" means programming (such as certain on -demand movie channels or pay - per -view programs) offered individually to Subscribers on a per - channel, per- program or per - event basis. "PEG" means public, educational and governmental. 4 2033319v1 "Person" means any natural person and all domestic and foreign corporations, closely - held corporations, associations, syndicates, joint stock corporations, partnerships of every kind, clubs, businesses, common law trusts, societies and/or any other legal entity. "Street" shall mean the surface of and the space above and below any public Street, road, highway, freeway, lane, path, public way, alley, court, sidewalk, boulevard, parkway, drive or any easement or right -of -way now or hereafter held by City which shall, within its proper use and meaning in the sole opinion of City, entitle Grantee to the use thereof for the purpose of installing or transmitting over poles, wires, cables, conductors, ducts, conduits, vaults, man- holes, amplifiers, appliances, attachments and other property as may be ordinarily necessary and pertinent to a Cable System. "Subscriber" means a Person who lawfully receives Cable Service. "Wireline MVPD" means a multichannel video programming distributor that utilizes the Streets to install cable or fiber and is engaged in the business of making available for purchase, by Subscribers, multiple Channels of video programming in the City. SECTION 2 FRANCHISE 2.1 Grant of Franchise. The City hereby authorizes Grantee to occupy or use the City's Streets subject to: 1) the provisions of this non - exclusive Franchise to provide Cable Service within the City; and 2) all applicable provisions of the City Code. Said Franchise shall constitute both a right and an obligation to provide Cable Services as required by the provisions of this Franchise. Nothing in this Franchise shall be construed to prohibit Grantee from: (1) providing services other than Cable Services to the extent not prohibited by Applicable Law; or (2) challenging any exercise of the City's legislative or regulatory authority in an appropriate forum. The City hereby reserves all of its rights to regulate such other services to the extent not prohibited by Applicable Law and no provision herein shall be construed to limit or give up any right to regulate. 2.2 Reservation of Authority. The Grantee specifically agrees to comply with the lawful provisions of the City Code and applicable regulations of the City. Subject to the police power exception below, in the event of a conflict between A) the lawful provisions of the City Code or applicable regulations of the City and B) this Franchise, the express provisions of this Franchise shall govern. Subject to express federal and state preemption, the material terms and conditions contained in this Franchise may not be unilaterally altered by the City through subsequent amendments to the City Code, ordinances or any regulation of City, except in the lawful exercise of City's police power. Grantee acknowledges that the City may modify its regulatory policies by lawful exercise of the City's police powers throughout the term of this Franchise. Grantee agrees to comply with such lawful modifications to the City Code; however, Grantee reserves all rights it may have to challenge such modifications to the City Code whether arising in contract or at law. The City reserves all of its rights and defenses to such challenges whether arising in contract or at law. Nothing in this Franchise shall (A) abrogate the right of the City to perform any public works or public improvements of any description, (B) be construed as 2033319v1 a waiver of any codes or ordinances of general applicability promulgated by the City, or (C) be construed as a waiver or release of the rights of the City in and to the Streets. 2.3 Franchise Term. The term of the Franchise shall be ten (10) years from the Effective Date, unless extended by mutual written consent in accordance with Section 17.7 or terminated sooner in accordance with this Franchise. 2.4 Franchise Area. This Franchise is granted for the Franchise Area defined herein. Grantee shall extend its Cable System to provide Service to any residential unit in the City in accordance_ with Section 6.6 herein. This Franchise governs any Cable Services provided by Grantee to residential -and commercial Subscribers to brantee's Cable System, 2.5. Franchise Nonexclusive. The Franchise granted herein shall be nonexclusive. The City specifically reserves the right to grant, at any time, such additional franchises for a Cable System as it deems appropriate provided, however, such additional grants shall not operate to materially modify, revoke, or terminate any rights previously granted to Grantee other than as described in Section 17.18. The grant of any additional franchise shall not of itself be`deemed to constitute a modification, revocation, or termination of rights previously granted to Grantee. Any additional cable franchise grants shall comply with Minn. Stat. Section 238.08 and any other applicable federal level playing field requirements. 2.6 Periodic Public Review of Franchise. Within sixty (60) Days of the third and sixth annual anniversary of the Effective Date of this Franchise, the City may conduct a public review of the Franchise. The purpose of any such review shall be to ensure, with the benefit of full opportunity for public comment, that the Grantee continues to effectively serve the public in the light of new developments in cable law and regulation, cable technology, cable company performance with the requirements of this Franchise, local regulatory environment, community needs and interests, and other such factors. Both the City and Grantee agree to make a full and good faith effort to participate in the review. So long as Grantee receives reasonable notice, Grantee shall participate in the review process and shall fully cooperate. The review shall not operate to modify or change any provision of this Franchise without mutual written consent in accordance with Section 17.7 of this Franchise. 2.7 . Transfer of Ownership.- (a). No sale, transfer, assignment or "fundamental corporate change ", as defined in Minn. Stat..§ 238.083, of this Franchise shall take place;until the parties to the sale, transfer, or fundamental corporate change files a written request with City for its approval, provided, however, that said approval shall not be required where Grantee grants a security interest in its Franchise and assets to secure an indebtedness. (b) City shall have thirty (30) Days from the time of the request to reply in writing and indicate approval of the request or its determination that a public hearing is necessary due to potential adverse affect on Grantee's Subscribers resulting from the sale or transfer. Such approval or detennination shall be expressed in writing within thirty (30) Days of receipt of said request, or the request shall be deemed approved as a matter of law. 6 2033319v1 (c) If a public hearing is deemed necessary pursuant to (b) above, such hearing shall be commenced within thirty (30) Days of such determination and notice of any such hearing shall be given in accordance with local law or fourteen (14) Days prior to the hearing by publishing notice thereof once in a newspaper of general circulation in City. The notice shall contain the date, time and place of the hearing and shall briefly state the substance of the action to be considered by City. (d) Within thirty (30) Days after the closing of the public hearing, City shall approve or deny in writing the sale or transfer request. City shall set forth in writing with particularity its reason(s) for denying approval. City shall not unreasonably withhold its approval. (e) The parties to the sale or transfer of the Franchise only, without the inclusion of the System in which substantial construction has commenced, shall establish that the sale or transfer of only the Franchise will be in the public interest. (f) Any sale or transfer of stock in Grantee so as to create a new controlling interest in the System shall be subject to the requirements of this Section 2.7. The term "controlling interest" as used herein is not limited to majority stock ownership, but includes actual working control in whatever manner exercised. (g) In no event shall a transfer or assignment of ownership or control be approved without the transferee becoming a signatory to this Franchise and assuming all rights and obligations thereunder, and assuming all other rights and obligations of the transferor to the City. (h) In the event of any proposed sale or assignment pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, City shall have the right of first refusal of any bona fide offer to purchase the Cable System. Bona fide offer, as used in this section, means an offer received by the Grantee which it intends to accept subject to City's rights under this section. This written offer must be conveyed to City along with the Grantee's written acceptance of the offer contingent upon the rights of City provided for in this section. City shall be deemed to have waived its rights under this paragraph (h) in the following circumstances: (i) If it does not indicate to Grantee in writing, within thirty (30) Days of notice of a proposed sale or assignment, its intention to exercise its right of purchase; or (ii) It approves the assignment or sale of the Franchise as provided within this section. 2.8 Expiration. Upon expiration of the Franchise, the City shall have the right at its own election and subject to Grantee's rights under Section 626 of the Cable Act to: (a) extend the Franchise, though nothing in this provision shall be construed to require such extension; (b) renew the Franchise, in accordance with Applicable Laws; 7 2033319v1 (c) - invite additional franchise applications or proposals; (d) terminate the Franchise subject to any rights Grantee has under Section 626 of the Cable Act; or (e) take such other action as the City deems appropriate. 2.9 Right to Require Removal of Property. 'At the expiration of the term for which the Franchise is granted provided no renewal is granted,: or upon its forfeiture or revocation as provided for herein, the City shall have the right to require Grantee to remove.. at Grantee's own expense all or any part of the Cable System from all Streets and public ways within the Franchise Area within a reasonable time. If Grantee fails to do so, the City may.perform the work and collect the cost thereof from Grantee. 2..10 Continuity of Service Mandatory. It shall be the right of all Subscribers to receive all available services insofar as their financial and other obligations to Grantee are honored. In the event that Grantee elects to .overbuild, rebuild, modify, or sell the system, or the City revokes or fails to renew the Franchise, Grantee shall make its best effort to ensure that all Subscribers receive continuous uninterrupted service, regardless of the circumstances, during the lifetime of the Franchise. In the event of expiration, purchase, lease - purchase, condemnation, acquisition, taking over or holding of plant and equipment, sale, lease, or other transfer to any other Person, including any other grantee of a cable communications franchise, the current Grantee shall cooperate fully to operate the system in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Franchise for a temporary period sufficient in length to maintain continuity of service to all Subscribers. SECTION 3 OPERATION IN STREETS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY 3.1 Use of Streets. (a) Grantee may, subject to the terms of this Franchise, erect, install, construct, repair, replace, reconstruct and retain in, on, over, under, upon, across and along the Streets within the City such lines, cables, conductors, ducts, conduits, vaults, manholes, amplifiers, appliances, pedestals, attachments and other property and equipment as are necessary and appurtenant to the operation of a Cable System within the City. Without limiting the foregoing, Gran tee expressly agrees that it will construct, operate and maintain its Cable System incompliance with, and subject to, the requirements of the City Code, including by way of example and not limitation, those requirements governing the placement of Grantee's Cable System; and with other applicable City Codes, and will obtain and maintain all permits and bonds required by the City Code in addition to those required in this Franchise. (b) All wires, conduits, cable and other property and facilities of Grantee shall be so located, constructed,. installed and maintained as not to endanger or unnecessarily interfere with the usual and customary trade, traffic and travel upon, or other use of, the Streets of City. Grantee shall keep and maintain all of its property in good condition, order and repair so that the same shall not menace or endanger the life or property of any 2033319v1 Person. Grantee shall keep accurate maps and records of all of its wires, conduits, cables and other property and facilities located, constructed and maintained in the City. (c) All wires, conduits, cables and other property and facilities of Grantee, shall be constructed and installed in an orderly and workmanlike manner. All wires, conduits and cables shall be installed, where possible, parallel with electric and telephone lines. Multiple cable configurations shall be arranged in parallel and bundled with due respect for engineering considerations. 3.2 Construction or Alteration. Grantee shall in all cases comply with the City Code, City resolutions and City regulations regarding the acquisition of permits and/or such other items as may be reasonably required in order to construct, alter or maintain the Cable System. Grantee shall, upon request, provide information to the City regarding its progress in completing or altering the Cable System. 3.3 Non - Interference. Grantee shall exert its best efforts to construct and maintain a Cable System so as not to interfere with other use of Streets. Grantee shall, where possible in the case of above ground lines, make use of existing poles and other facilities available to Grantee. When residents receiving underground service or who will be receiving underground service will be affected by proposed construction or alteration, Grantee shall provide such notice as set forth in the permit or in City Code of the same to such affected residents. 3.4 Consistency with Designated Use. Notwithstanding the above grant to use Streets, no Street shall be used by Grantee if the City, in its sole opinion, determines that such use is inconsistent with the terms, conditions or provisions by which such Street was created or dedicated, or presently used under Applicable Laws. 3.5 Undergrounding. Grantee shall place underground all of its transmission lines which are located or are to be located above or within the Streets of the City in the following cases: (a) all other existing utilities are required to be placed underground by statute, resolution, policy or other Applicable Law; (b) Grantee is unable to get pole clearance; (c) underground easements are obtained from developers of new residential areas; or (d) utilities are overhead but residents prefer underground (service provided at cost). If an ordinance is passed which involves placing underground certain utilities including Grantee's cable plant which is then located overhead, Grantee shall participate in such underground project and shall remove poles, cables and overhead wires if requested to do so and place facilities underground. Nothing herein shall mandate that City provide reimbursement to Grantee for the costs of such relocation and removal. However, if the City makes available funds for the cost of placing facilities underground, nothing herein shall preclude the Grantee 2033319vi from participating in, such funding to the extent consistent with the City Code or Applicable Laws. Grantee shall. use conduit or its functional equivalent to the greatest extent possible for undergrounding, except for Drops from pedestals to Subscribers' homes and for cable on other private property where the owner requests that conduit not be used. Cable and conduit shall be utilized which meets the highest industry standards for electronic performance and resistance to interference or damage from environmental factors. Grantee shall use, in conjunction with other utility companies or providers, common trenches for underground construction wherever available. 3.6 Maintenance and Restoration. (a) Restoration. In case of disturbance of any; Street,,public`way, paved area or public improvement; Grantee shall, at its own cost and expense and in.accordance with the requirements of Applicable Law, restore such Street, public way, paved area or public improvement to substantially the same condition as existed before the work involving such disturbance took place. All requirements of this section pertaining to public property shall also apply to the restoration of private easements and other private property. Grantee ;shall perform all restoration work within a reasonable time and with due regard to seasonal working conditions. If Grantee fails, neglects or refuses to make restorations as required under this section, then the City may do such work or cause it to be done, and the cost thereof to the City shall be paid by Grantee. If Grantee causes any damage to private property in the process of restoring facilities, Grantee shall repair such damage. (b) Maintenance. Grantee shall maintain all above ground improvements that it places on City right -of -way pursuant to the City Code and any permit issued by the City. In order to avoid interference with the City's ability to maintain the right -of -way, Grantee shall provide such clearance as is required by the City Code and any permit issued by the City: if Grantee fails to comply with this provision, and by its failure, property is damaged, Grantee shall be responsible for all damages caused thereby. (c) Disputes. In any dispute over the adequacy of restoration or maintenance relative to this section, final determination shall be the prerogative of the City, Department of Public Works and consistent with the City Code and any permit issued by the City. 3.7 Work on Private Property. Grantee, with the consent of property owners, shall have the authority' pursuant to the City Code, to trim trees upon and overhanging Streets, alleys, sidewalks, and public ways so as to prevent the branches of such trees from coming in contact with the wires and cables of Grantee, except that at the option of the City, such trimming may be done by it or under its supervision and direction at the reasonable expense of Grantee. 3.8 Relocation. (a) City Property. If, during the term of the Franchise, the City or any government entity elects or requires a third party to alter, repair, realign, abandon, 10 2033319v1 improve, vacate, reroute or change the grade of any Street, public way or other public property; or to construct, maintain or repair any public improvement; or to replace, repair install, maintain, or otherwise alter any cable, wire conduit, pipe, line, pole, wire- holding structure, structure, or other facility, including a facility used for the provision of utility or other services or transportation of drainage, sewage or other liquids, for any public purpose, Grantee shall, upon request, except as otherwise hereinafter provided, at its sole expense remove or relocate as necessary its poles, wires, cables, underground conduits, vaults, pedestals, manholes and any other facilities which it has installed. Nothing herein shall mandate that City provide reimbursement to Grantee for the costs of such relocation and removal. However, if the City makes available funds for the cost of placing facilities underground, nothing herein shall preclude the Grantee from participating in such funding to the extent consistent with the City Code or Applicable Laws. (b) Utilities and Other Franchisees. If, during the term of the Franchise, another entity which holds a franchise or any utility requests Grantee to remove or relocate such facilities to accommodate the construction, maintenance or repair of the requesting party's facilities, or their more efficient use, or to "make ready" the requesting parry's facilities for use by others, or because Grantee is using a facility which the requesting party has a right or duty to remove, Grantee shall do so. The companies involved may decide among themselves who is to bear the cost of removal or relocation, pursuant to City Code, and provided that the City shall not be liable for such costs. (c) Notice to Remove or Relocate. Any Person requesting Grantee to remove or relocate its facilities shall give Grantee no less than forty -five (45) Days' advance written notice to Grantee advising Grantee of the date or dates removal or relocation is to be undertaken; provided, that no advance written notice shall be required in emergencies or in cases where public health and safety or property is endangered. (d) Failure by Grantee to Remove or Relocate. If Grantee fails, neglects or refuses to remove or relocate its facilities as directed by the City; or in emergencies or where public health and safety or property is endangered, the City may do such work or cause it to be done, and the cost thereof to the City shall be paid by Grantee. If Grantee fails, neglects or refuses to remove or relocate its facilities as directed by another franchisee or utility, that franchisee or utility may do such work or cause it to be done, and if Grantee would have been liable for the cost of performing such work, the cost thereof to the party performing the work or having the work performed shall be paid by Grantee. (e) Procedure for Removal of Cable. Grantee shall not remove any underground cable or conduit which requires trenching or other opening of the Streets along the extension of cable to be removed, except as hereinafter provided. Grantee may remove any underground cable from the Streets which has been installed in such a manner that it can be removed without trenching or other opening of the Streets along the extension of cable to be removed. Subject to Applicable Law, Grantee shall remove, at its sole cost and expense, any underground cable or conduit by trenching or opening of the Streets along the extension thereof or otherwise which is ordered to be removed by the City based upon a determination, in the sole discretion of the City, that removal is 11 20333190 required in order to eliminate or prevent a hazardous condition. Underground cable and conduit in the Streets which is not removed shall be deemed abandoned and title thereto shall be vested in the City. (f) Movement of Buildings. Grantee shall, upon request by any Person .holding a building moving permit, franchise or other approval issued by the City, temporarily remove, raise or lower its wire to permit the movement of buildings. The expense of such removal, raising or lowering shall be paid by the Person requesting same, and Grantee shall be authorized to require such payment in advance. The City shall require all building movers to provide not less than fifteen (15) Days' notice to the cable company to arrange for such temporary wire changes. SECTION 4 REMOVAL OR ABANDONMENT OF SYSTEM 4.1 Removal of Cable System. In the event that: (1) the use of the Cable System is discontinued for any reason for a continuous period of twelve (12) months; or (2) the Cable System has been installed in a Street without complying with the requirements of this Franchise, Grantee, at its expense shall, at the demand of the City remove promptly from the Streets all of the Cable System other than any which the City may permit to be abandoned in place. In the event of any such,removal Grantee shall promptly restore to a condition as nearly as possible to its prior condition the Street or other public places in the City from which the System has been removed. 4:2 ' Abandonment of Cable System. In the event of Grantee's abandonment of the Cable System; City shall have the right to require Grantee to conform to the state right -of -way rules, Minn. Rules, Chapter 7819. The Cable System to be abandoned in place shall be abandoned in the manner prescribed by the City. Grantee may not abandon any portion of the System without having first given three (3) months written notice to the City. Grantee may not abandon any portion of the System without compensating the City for damages resulting from the abandonment. 4.3 Removal after Abandonment or Termination. If Grantee has failed to commence removal of System, or such part thereof as was designated by City, within thirty (3 0) days after - written notice of City's demand for removal consistent with Minna Rules, Ch. 7819, is given, or if Grantee has failed to complete such removal within twelve (12) months after written notice of City's demand for removal is given, City shall have the right to apply funds secured by the letter of credit and performance bond toward removal and/or declare all right, title, and interest to the Cable System to be in City with all rights of ownership including, but not limited to, the right to operate the Cable System or transfer the Cable System to another for operation by it. 4.4 City Options for Failure to Remove Cable System. If Grantee has failed to complete such removal within the time given after written notice of the City's demand for removal is given, the City shall have the right to exercise one of the following options: 12 20333190 (a) Declare all right, title and interest to the System to be in the City or its designee with all rights of ownership including, but not limited to, the right to operate the System or transfer the System to another for operation by it; or (b) Declare the System abandoned and cause the System, or such part thereof as the City shall designate, to be removed at no cost to the City. The cost of said removal shall be recoverable from the security fund, indemnity and penalty section provided for in this Franchise or from Grantee directly. (c) Upon termination of service to any Subscriber, Grantee shall promptly remove all its facilities and equipment from within the dwelling of a Subscriber who owns such dwelling upon his or her written request, except as provided by Applicable Law. Such Subscribers shall be responsible for any costs incurred by Grantee in removing the facilities and equipment. 4.5 System Construction and Equipment Standards. The Cable System shall be installed and maintained in accordance with standard good engineering practices and shall conform, when applicable, with the National Electrical Safety Code, the National Electrical Code and the FCC's Rules and Regulations. 4.6 System Maps and Layout. Grantee shall maintain complete and accurate system maps, which shall include trunks, distribution lines, and nodes. Such maps shall include up -to- date route maps showing the location of the Cable System adjacent to the Streets. Grantee shall make all maps available for review by the appropriate City personnel. SECTION 5 SYSTEM DESIGN AND CAPACITY 5.1 Availability of Signals and Equipment. (a) Prior to the Effective Date of this Franchise, Grantee upgraded its Cable System to a fiber to the fiber node Cable System architecture, with fiber optic cable deployed from Grantee's headend to Grantee's fiber nodes, tying into Grantee's coaxial Cable System already serving Subscribers. Active and passive devices currently are passing a minimum of 750 MHz (with a minimum passband of between 50 and 750 MHz) providing to Subscribers at least two hundred (200) or more activated minimum downstream video Channels and minimum activated upstream digital Channel capacity of 35 MHz accessible from any node and any Subscriber in the Franchise Area. This upstream capacity requires no additional installation of equipment for use except on users' premises. (b) The entire System shall be technically capable of transmitting NTSC analog, compressed digital and HDTV transmissions. The Grantee shall comply with all FCC regulations regarding carriage of digital and HDTV transmissions. (c) Grantee agrees to maintain the Cable System in a manner consistent with, or in excess of the specifications in Section 5.1 (a) and (b) throughout the term of the Franchise with sufficient capability and technical quality to enable the 13 2033319vl implementation and performance of all the requirements of this Franchise, including the exhibits hereto, and in a manner which meets or exceeds FCC technical qualitystandards at 47 C.F.R. § 76 Subpart K, regardless of the particular format in which a signal is transmitted. 5.2 Free Cable Service to Public Buildings. (a) Throughout the term of this Franchise Grantee shall provide, free of charge, one (1) service Drop, three (3) Converters, if necessary and requested, and Basic Cable Service and the next highest level of Service generally available to all Subscribers (as of the Effective Date referred to `as Expanded Basic Cable Service) ( "Complimentary. Service "), to all of the sites listed on. Exhibit A attached hereto. (b) If the Drop line to.such building exceeds three hundred fifty (350) feet, Grantee will accommodate the Drop up to three hundred fifty (350) feet if the City or other agency provides the necessary attachment point for aerial service or conduit pathway for underground service. If the necessary pathway is not provided, the City or other agency agrees to pay the incremental cost of such Drop in excess of two hundred (200) feet for an aerial service Drop, or in excess of one hundred twenty -five (125) feet for an underground service Drop. For purposes of this paragraph, "incremental cost" means Grantee's actual cost to provide the Drop beyond the applicable distances, with no mark -up for profit. The recipient of the service will secure any necessary right of entry. (c) The City or the building occupant shall have the right to extend Cable Service throughout the building to additional outlets without any fees imposed by Grantee for the provision of Complimentary Service to such additional outlets. If ancillary equipment, such as a Converter, is required to receive the signal at additional outlets, Grantee will provide up to three (3) devices at no charge, and will provide additional devices at Grantee's lowest residential rate charged within the Twin Cities metropolitan area. (d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this section, Grantee shall not be required to provide Complimentary Service to such buildings unless it is technically feasible. Outlets and maintenance of said Complimentary Service shall be provided free of fees and charges. 5.3 Equal and Uniform Service. To the extent required by Applicable Law, Grantee shall provide access to equal and uniform Cable Service throughout the City. 5.4 System Specifications. (a) System Maintenance. In all its construction and service provision activities, Grantee shall meet or exceed the construction, technical performance, extension and service requirements set forth in this Franchise. 14 20333190 (b) Emergency Alert Capability. At all times during the term of this Franchise, Grantee shall provide and maintain an Emergency Alert System (EAS) consistent with applicable federal law and regulations including 47 C.F.R., Part 11, and any Minnesota State Emergency Alert System requirements. The City may identify authorized emergency officials for activating the EAS consistent with the Minnesota State Emergency Statewide Plan ( "EAS Plan"). The City may also develop a local plan containing methods of EAS message distribution, subject to Applicable Laws and the EAS Plan. Nothing in this section is intended to expand Grantee's obligations beyond that which is required by the EAS Plan and Applicable Law. (c) Standby Power. Grantee shall provide standby power generating capacity at the Cable System control center and at all hubs. Grantee shall maintain standby power system supplies, rated at least at two (2) hours' duration, throughout the trunk and distribution networks. In addition, Grantee shall have in place throughout the Franchise term a plan, and all resources necessary for implementation of the plan, for dealing with outages of more than two (2) hours. (d) Technical Standards. The technical standards used in the operation of the Cable System shall comply, at minimum, with the technical standards promulgated by the FCC relating to Cable Systems pursuant to Title 47, Section 76, Subpart K of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended or modified from time to time, which regulations are expressly incorporated herein by reference. The Cable System shall be installed and maintained in accordance with standard good engineering practices and shall conform with the National Electrical Safety Code and all other Applicable Laws governing the construction of the Cable System. 5.5 Performance Testing. Grantee shall perform all system tests at the intervals required by the FCC, and all other tests reasonably necessary to determine compliance with technical standards required by this Franchise. These tests shall include, at a minimum: (a) Initial proof of performance for any construction; (b) Semi - annual compliance tests; (c) Tests in response to Subscriber complaints; (d) Tests requested by the City to demonstrate franchise compliance; and (e) Written records of all system test results performed by or for Grantee shall be maintained, and shall be available for City inspection upon request. 5.6 Special Testing. (a) Throughout the term of this Franchise, City shall have the right to inspect all construction or installation work performed pursuant to the provisions of the Franchise. In addition, City may require special testing of a location or locations within the System if there is a particular matter of controversy or unresolved complaints regarding such construction or installation work or pertaining to such location(s). 15 2033319v1 Demand for such special tests may be made on the basis of complaints received or other evidence indicating an unresolved controversy or noncompliance. Such tests shall be limited to the particular matter in controversy or,unresolved complaints. City shall . endeavor to so arrange its request for such special testing so as to minimize hardship or inconvenience to Grantee or;to the Subscribers caused by such testing. (b) Before ordering such tests, Grantee shall be afforded thirty (30) Days following receipt of written notice to investigate and, if necessary, correct problems or complaints upon which tests were; ordered. City shall meet with Grantee prior to requiring special tests to, discuss the need for such and, if possible, visually inspect those locations which are the focus of concern. If, after such meetings and inspections, City wishes to cbmmerice''special" tests and the thirty .(30) Days have elapsed without correction of the matter in controversy or unresolved complaints, the tests shall-be conducted at Grantee's expense'by Grantee's qualified engineer. The City shall have a right to participate in such testing by having an engineer of City's choosing, and at City's expense, observe and monitor said testing. SECTION 6 PROGRAMMING AND SERVICES 6.1 Categories of Programming Service. Grantee shall provide video programming services in at least the following broad categories: Local Broadcast (subject to federal carriage requirements) Public Broadcast News and Information Sports General Entertainment Arts/Performance /Humanities Science /Technology Children/Family /Seniors Foreign Language/Ethnic Programming Public, Educational and Governmental Access Programming (to.the extent required by the Franchise) Movies Leased Access 6.2 Changes. in Programming Services. Grantee shall not delete or so limit as to effectively delete any broad category of programming within its control without the City's consent. Further, Grantee shall provide at least thirty (30) Days' prior written notice to Subscribers and to the City of Grantee's request to effectively delete any broad category of programming or any Channel within its control, including all proposed changes in bandwidth or Channel allocation and any assignments including any new equipment requirements that may occur as a result of these changes. 6.3 Parental Control Device. Upon request by any Subscriber, Grantee shall make available for sale or lease a parental control or lockout device that will enable the Subscriber to 16 2033319v1 block all access to any and all Channels without affecting those not blocked. Grantee shall inform Subscribers of the availability of the lockout device at the time of original subscription and annually thereafter. 6.4 FCC Reports. The results of any tests required to be filed by Grantee with the FCC shall also be copied to City within ten (10) Days of the conduct of the date of the tests. 6.5 Annexation. Unless otherwise provided by Applicable Law, including the City Code, upon the annexation of any additional land area by City, the annexed area shall thereafter be subject to all the terms of this Franchise upon sixty (60) Days written notification to Grantee of the annexation by City. Unless otherwise required by Applicable Laws, nothing herein shall require the Grantee to expand its Cable System to serve, or to offer Cable Service to any area annexed by the City if such area is then served by another Wireline NWPD franchised to provide multichannel video programming. 6.6 Line Extension. (a) Grantee shall construct and operate its Cable System so as to provide Cable Service within the Franchise Area where there exists a density equivalent of seven (7) dwelling units per one - quarter (1/4) mile of feeder cable as measured from the nearest active plant of the Cable System if the extension is to be constructed using aerial plant, and nine (9) dwelling units per one - quarter (1/4) mile of feeder cable as measured from the nearest active plant if the extension is to be constructed using underground plant. The City, for its part, shall endeavor to exercise reasonable efforts to require developers and utility companies to provide the Grantee with at least fifteen (15) Days advance notice of an available open trench for the placement of necessary cable. (b) Where the density is less than that specified above, Grantee shall inform Persons requesting Service of the possibility of paying for installation or a line extension and shall offer to provide them with a free written estimate of the cost, which shall be provided within fifteen (15) working days of such a request. Grantee may offer the Persons requesting Service the opportunity to "prepay" some or all of the necessary line extensions according to its regular business policies. Grantee shall at all times implement such line extension policy in a nondiscriminatory manner throughout the City. (c) Any residential unit located within one - hundred twenty -five (125) feet from the nearest point of access on the Street from which the Cable System is designed to serve the site shall be connected to the Cable System at no charge other than the standard installation charge. Grantee shall, upon request by any potential Subscriber residing in City beyond the one hundred twenty -five (125) foot limit, extend service to such Subscriber provided that the Subscriber shall pay the net additional Drop costs, unless the Grantee agrees to waive said costs. To the extent consistent with Applicable Laws, Grantee agrees that it shall impose installation costs for non - standard installations in a uniform and nondiscriminatory manner throughout the City. 6.7 Nonvoice Return Capability. Grantee is required to use cable and associated electronics having the technical capacity for nonvoice return communications. 17 20333190 SECTION 7 PUBLIC, EDUCATIONAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACCESS 7.1 Number of PEG Access Channels. Grantee will maintain four (4) PEG Access Channels for the first twelve (12) months of the Franchise term. Twelve (12) months after the Effective Date of the Franchise, the City shall be entitled to only three (3) PEG Access Channels. 7.2 Analog, Digital and IID PEG Carriage Requirements. Grantee shall provide the Access Channels on the most basic tier of service offered by Grantee in accordance with the Cable Act, Section 611, and as further set forth in this Section T At such,time as Grantee no longer offers Basic Cable Service in an analog format, Grantee shall carry all PEG Access Channels in`a standard digital format in Grantee's Basic Cable Service package,' unless the parties agree to' an earlier conversion date. Thereafter, and upon ninety (90) days' notice from the City, Grantee shall make one (1) of the three (3) PEG Access Channels available in high definition (HD) format, provided that Grantee receives a satisfactory HD signal from the program originator. (a) The City acknowledges that receipt of an HD format Access Channel may require Subscribers to buy or lease special equipment, or pay additional HD charges applicable to all HD services. (b) All Access Channels may be delivered by City to Grantee in either analog or standard digital format. (c) Within twelve (12) months of the Effective Date, and with at least one hundred twenty (120) Day written notice to Grantee, the City may provide PEG Access Channels in only HD format to the demarcation point to provide the signal to Grantee, and as such the City will no longer provide the PEG Access Channels in a standard definition digital format. Grantee shall provide all necessary transmission equipment from the demarcation point and throughout Grantee's distribution system, in order to deliver the PEG Access Channels. Access Channel signals delivered in HD format to Grantee shall not require Grantee to deliver such HD signals to Subscribers except as set forth herein. 7.3 Existing PEG Studio and Playback. Within thirty (30) Days of the Effective Date, Grantee shall have no' further obligation to maintain Grantee's public access studio located in Eden Prairie ( "Studio "). Grantee shall maintain all public access and educational access playback equipment and playback staff at the Studio for twelve (12) months from the Effective Date ( "Transition Period"). 7.4 Existing PEG Equipment Transfer. Grantee will transfer all existing PEG equipment, racks, lights, facilities, etc. currently in use at the Studio to the Commission. Timing for the equipment transfer will occur within sixty (60) days following close of the Studio and the equipment transfer for playback will occur shortly after the Transition Period is completed. 7.5 Control of PEG Channels. The control and administration of the Access Channels shall rest with the City and the City may delegate, from time to time over the term of 18 2033319v1 this Franchise, such control and administration to various entities as determined in City's sole discretion. 7.6 Transmission of Access Channels. Access Channels may be used for transmission of non -video signals in compliance with Applicable Laws. This may include downstream transmission of data using a protocol such as TCP /IP or current industry standards. • Should Grantee develop the capability to provide bi- directional data transmission, spectrum capacity shall be sufficient to allow Subscribers to transmit data to PEG facilities. 7.7 Access Channel Locations. (a) Access Channels shall be carried on the Basic Cable Service tier to the extent required by Applicable Law and as set forth in Section 7.2 herein. Nothing herein precludes the Grantee from charging for equipment needed for Basic Cable Service. Grantee shall make every reasonable effort to coordinate the cablecasting of PEG access programming on the Cable System on the same Channel designations as such programming is currently cablecast within the City. In no event shall any Access Channel reallocations be made prior to ninety (90) Days written notice to the City by Grantee, except for circumstances beyond Grantee's reasonable control. The Access Channels will be located within reasonable proximity to other commercial video or broadcast Channels, excluding pay - per -view programming offered by Grantee in the City. (b) Grantee agrees not to encrypt the Access Channels differently than other commercial Channels available on the Cable System. (c) In conjunction with any occurrence of any Access Channel(s) relocation, Grantee shall provide a minimum of Nine Thousand Dollars ($9,000) of in -kind air time per event on advertiser supported Channels (e.g. USA, TNT, TBS, Discovery Channel, or other comparable Channels) for the purpose of airing City's, or its designees', pre - produced thirty (30) second announcement explaining the change in location. 7.8 Navigation to Access Channels. Grantee agrees that if it utilizes a visual interface under its control on its Cable System for all Channels, the Access Channels shall be treated in a non - discriminatory fashion consistent with Applicable Laws so that Subscribers will have ready access to Access Channels. This shall not be construed to require Grantee to pay any third party fees that may result from this obligation. 7.9 Ownership of Access Channels. Grantee does not relinquish its ownership of or ultimate right of control over a Channel by designating it for PEG use. A PEG access user — whether an individual, educational or governmental user — acquires no property or other interest by virtue of the use of a Channel position so designated. Grantee shall not exercise editorial control over any public, educational, or governmental use of a Channel position, except Grantee may refuse to transmit any public access program or portion of a public access program that contains obscenity, indecency, or nudity in violation of Applicable Law. 7.10 Noncommercial Use of PEG. Permitted noncommercial uses of the Access Channels shall include by way of example and not limitation: (1) the identification of financial 19 2033319v1 supporters similar to what is provided on public broadcasting stations; or (2) the solicitation of financial support for the provision of PEG programming by the City or third;party users for charitable, educational or governmental purposes; or (3) programming offered,by accredited, non = profit, educational institutions which may, for example, offer telecourses over a Access Channel. 7.11 Dedicated Fiber Return Lines. Grantee will maintain all existing fiber paths in place as of the Effective Date to facilitate PEG origination/return-capacity in the .City. Such fiber returns paths are listed in Exhibit B attached hereto: Grantee shall not be responsible for fiber "replacement" but will handle any damage and all maintenance on,the existing fiber. Grantee anticipates, but cannot guarantee, that that this will result in minimal fiber expenditures by the City over the'Franchise term. 7.12 Interconnection. To the extent technically feasible, Grantee will allow necessary interconnection with any newly constructed City, and'.school fiber for noncommercial programming to be promoted and administered by the City as allowed under Applicable Laws and at no additional cost to the City or schools. This may be accomplished through a patch panel or other similar facility and each party will be responsible for the fiber on their respective sides of the demarcation point. Grantee reserves its right to review on a case -by -case basis the technical feasibility of the proposed interconnection. Based on this review Grantee may condition the interconnection on the reasonable reimbursement of Grantee's incremental costs, with no markup for profit, to recoup Grantee's construction costs only. In no event will Grantee impose any type of recurring fee for said interconnection. 7.13 Ancillary Equipment. Any ancillary equipment operated by Grantee for the benefit of PEG Access Channels on Grantee's fiber paths or Cable System, whether referred to switchers, routers or other equipment, will be maintained by Grantee, at no cost to the City or schools for the life of the Franchise. Grantee is responsible for any ancillary.equipment on its side of the demarcation point and the City or school is responsible for all other production/playback equipment. 7.14 Future Fiber Return Lines for PEG.. At such time that the City determines: (a) that'the City desires the- capacity to allow Subscribers in the City to receive PEG programming (video or character generated) .which may originate from schools, City facilities, other government facilities or other designated facilities (other than those indicated in paragraph- 10); or (b) that the City desires to establish or change a location from which PEG programming is originated; or (c) that the City desires to upgrade the Connection to Grantee from an existing signal point of origination, the City will give Grantee written notice detailing the point of origination and the capability sought by the City. Grantee agrees to submit a cost estimate to implement the City's plan within a reasonable period of time but not later than September 1" in the year proceeding the request for any costs exceeding Twenty -five Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($25,000). The cost estimate 20 20333190 will be on a time and materials basis with no additional markup. After an agreement to reimburse Grantee for Grantee's out of pocket time and material costs, Grantee will implement any necessary Cable System changes within a reasonable period of time. Nothing herein prevents the City, or a private contractor retained by the City, from constructing said return fiber. 7.15 Access Channel Carriage. (a) Any and all costs associated with any modification of the Access Channels or signals after the Access Channels /signals leave the City's designated playback facilities, or any designated playback center authorized by the City shall be borne entirely by Grantee. Grantee shall not cause any programming to override PEG programming on any Access Channel, except by oral or written permission from the City, with the exception of emergency alert signals. (b) The City may request and Grantee shall provide an additional Access Channel when the cumulative time on all the existing Access Channels combined meets the following standard: whenever one of the Access Channels in use during eighty percent (80 %) of the weekdays, Monday through Friday, for eighty percent (80 %) of the time during a consecutive three (3) hour period for six (6) weeks running, and there is a demand for use of an additional Channel for the same purpose, the Grantee has six (6) months in which to provide a new, Access Channel for the same purpose; provided that, the provision of the additional Channel or Channels does not require the Cable System to install Converters. (c) The VHF spectrum shall be used for one (1) of the public, educational, or governmental specially designated Access Channels. (d) The City or its designee shall be responsible for developing, implementing, interpreting and enforcing rules for PEG Access Channel use. (e) The Grantee shall monitor the Access Channels for technical quality to ensure that they meet FCC technical standards including those applicable to the carriage of Access Channels, provided however, that the Grantee is not responsible for the production quality of PEG programming productions. The City, or its designee, shall be responsible for the production and quality of all PEG access programming. Grantee shall carry all components of the standard definition of Access Channel including, but not limited to, closed captioning, stereo audio and other elements associated with the programming. 21 2033319v1 7.16 Access Channel Support. (a) Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Franchise Grantee shall remit to the Commission a one -time Two Hundred Thousand and No /100 Dollar ($200,000) grant in support of PEG capital purposes: ( "PEG Grant "). Comcast retains all legal authority it may possess to-recover the PEG Grant from Subscribers in any manner permitted by Applicable Law. '(b) Upon the Effective Date of this Franchise, Grantee shall also collect and remit to, the City Sixty cents (60¢) per,Subscriber per month in support of PEG capital ( "PEG Fee "). (c) During the twelve (12) months following the Effective "Date, Grantee shall retain, Thirteen cents (13¢) of the Sixty cent (60¢) PEG Fee to °reimburse Grantee for the costs associated with maintaining staff, equipment and space at the Studio to handle the public and educational playback obligations for the Transition Period. This will result in the City receiving a Forty -seven cent (47¢) PEG Fee for the first twelve (12) months of the Franchise. Thereafter the PEG Fee will revert to the Sixty cent (60¢) level for the remainder of the ten (10) year Franchise term — subject to the one -time inflation adjustment set forth in Section 7.16 (d) below. (d) At the fifth (5`h) anniversary of the Effective Date of this Franchise, the City, at its discretion, may require Grantee to increase the PEG Fee to Sixty -five cents (65¢) per Subscriber per month for the remaining term of the Franchise. The PEG Fee shall be used by City in its sole discretion to fund PEG access capital expenditures. (e) Neither the PEG Grant nor the PEG Fee are intended to represent part of the Franchise Fee and are intended to fall within one (1) or more of the exceptions in 47 U.S.C. § 542. The PEG Grant and PEG Fee may be categorized, itemized, and passed through to Subscribers as permissible, in accordance with 47 U.S.C. §542 or other Applicable Laws. Grantee shall pay the PEG Fee to the City quarterly at the same time as the payment of Franchise Fees under.Section 16.1 of the Franchise. Grantee agrees that it will not, offset or reduce its payment of past, present or future Franchise Fees required as a result of its obligation to remit the PEG Funds or the PEG Fee. (f) Any PEG Access capital support amounts owing pursuant to this Franchise which remain unpaid more than twenty -five (25) Days after the.date the payment is due.shall be delinquent and shall thereafter accrue interest at twelve percent (12 %) per annum or the prime lending rate published by the Wall Street Journal on the Day the payment was due plus two percent (2 %),whichever is greater. 7.17 PEG Technical Quality. (a) Grantee shall not be required to carry a PEG Access Channel in a higher quality format than that of the Channel Signal delivered to Grantee, but Grantee shall not implement a change in the method of delivery of Access Channels that results in a material degradation of signal quality or impairment of viewer reception of Access Channels, provided that this requirement shall not prohibit Grantee from implementing 22 2033319v1 new technologies also utilized for commercial Channels carried on its Cable System. Grantee shall meet FCC signal quality standards when offering Access Channels on its Cable System and shall continue to comply with closed captioning pass - through requirements. There shall be no significant deterioration in an Access Channels signal from the point of origination upstream to the point of reception downstream on the Cable System. (b) Within twenty-four (24) hours of a written request from City to the Grantee identifying a technical problem with a Access Channel and requesting assistance, Grantee will provide technical assistance or diagnostic services to determine whether or not a problem with a PEG signal is the result of matters for which Grantee is responsible and if so, Grantee will take prompt corrective action. If the problem persists and there is a dispute about the cause, then the parties shall meet with engineering representation from Grantee and the City in order to determine the course of action to remedy the problem. 7.18 Access Channel Promotion. Grantee shall allow the City to place bill stuffers in Grantee's Subscriber statements at a cost to the City not to exceed Grantee's out of pocket cost, no less frequently than twice per year, or at such time as a Access Channel is moved or relocated, upon the written request of the City and at such times that the placement of such materials would not materially and adversely affect Grantee's cost for the production and mailing of such statements. The City agrees to pay Grantee in advance for the actual cost of such bill stuffers. 7.19 Change in Technology. In the event Grantee makes any change in the Cable System and related equipment and facilities or in its signal delivery technology, which requires the City to obtain new equipment in order to be compatible with such change for purposes of transport and delivery of the Access Channels, Grantee shall, at its own expense and free of charge to City or its designated entities, purchase such equipment as may be necessary to facilitate the cablecasting of the Access Channels in accordance with the requirements of the Franchise. 7.20 Relocation of Grantee's Headend. In the event Grantee relocates its headend, Grantee will be responsible for replacing or restoring the existing dedicated fiber connections at Grantee's cost so that all the functions and capacity remain available, operate reliably and satisfy all applicable technical standards and related obligations of the Franchise free of charge to the City or its designated entities. 7.21 Regional Channel Six. Grantee shall make available Regional Channel Six as long as it is required to do so by the State of Minnesota. 7.22 Government Access Channel Functionality. Grantee agrees to provide the capability such that the City, from its City Hall, can switch its government Access Channel in the following ways: (a) Insert live Council meetings from City Hall; (b) Replay government access programming from City Hall; and 23 2033319v1 (c) Transmit character generated programming. (d) Schedule for Grantee to replay City - provided tapes in pre - arranged time slot on the government Access Channel; and (e) Switch to C -SPAN 2 or other comparable programming provided by the Grantee at any time when not carrying live or taped government access programming. . 7.23 Compliance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238. In addition to the . requirements contained in this Section 7 of this Franchise, Grantee and City shall comply with the PEG requirements mandated by Minn. Stat. 238.084. SECTION, 8 REGULATORY PROVISIONS. 8.1 Intent. The City shall have the right to administer and regulate activities under the Franchise up to the full extent permitted by Applicable Law. 8.2 Delegation of Authority to Regulate. The City reserves the right to delegate its regulatory authority wholly or in part to agents of the City, including, but not limited to, an agency which may be formed to regulate several franchises in the region in a manner consistent with Applicable Laws. This may include but shall not be limited to the Commission or other entity as City may determine in its sole discretion. Any existing delegation in place at the time of the grant of this Franchise shall remain intact unless expressly modified by City. 8.3 Areas of Administrative Authority. In addition to any other regulatory authority granted to the City by law or franchise, the City shall have administrative authority in the following areas: (a) Administering and enforcing the provisions of this Franchise, including the adoption of administrative rules and regulations to carry out this responsibility. (b) Coordinating the operation of Access Channels. (c): Formulating and recommending long -range cable communications policy for the Franchise Area. (d) Disbursing and utilizing Franchise revenues paid to the City. (e) Administering the regulation of rates, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law. (f) All other regulatory authority permitted under Applicable Law. The City or its designee shall have continuing regulatory jurisdiction and supervision over the System and the Grantee's operations under the Franchise to the extent allowed by Applicable Law. 24 2033319v1 8.4 Regulation of Rates and Charges. (a) Right to Regulate. The City reserves the right to regulate rates or charges for any Cable Service within the limits of Applicable Law, to enforce rate regulations prescribed by the FCC, and to establish procedures for said regulation or enforcement. (b) Notice of Change in Rates and Charges. Throughout the term of this Franchise, Grantee shall give the City and all Subscribers within the City at least thirty (30) Days' notice of any intended modifications or additions to Subscriber rates or charges. Nothing in this Subsection shall be construed to prohibit the reduction or waiving of rates or charges in conjunction with promotional campaigns for the purpose of attracting Subscribers or users. (c) Rate Discrimination Prohibited. Within any category of Subscribers, Grantee shall not discriminate among Subscribers with regard to rates and charges made for any service based on considerations of race, color, creed, sex, marital or economic status, national origin, sexual preference, or (except as allowed by Applicable Law) neighborhood of residence, except as otherwise provided herein; and for purposes of setting rates and charges, no categorization of Subscribers shall be made by Grantee on the basis of those considerations. Nevertheless, Grantee shall be permitted to establish (1) discounted rates and charges for providing Cable Service to low- income, handicapped, or low- income elderly Subscribers, (2) promotional rates, and (3) bulk rate and package discount pricing. SECTION 9 BOND. 9.1 Performance Bond. Upon the Effective Date of this Franchise and at all times thereafter Grantee shall maintain with City a bond in the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) in such form and with such sureties as shall be acceptable to City, conditioned upon the faithful performance by Grantee of this Franchise and the acceptance hereof given by City and upon the further condition that in the event Grantee shall fail to comply with any law, ordinance or regulation, there shall be recoverable jointly and severally from the principal and surety of the bond, any damages or losses suffered by City as a result, including the full amount of any compensation, indemnification or cost of removal of any property of Grantee, including a reasonable allowance for attorneys' fees and costs (with interest at two percent (2 %) in excess of the then prime rate), up to the full amount of the bond, and which bond shall further guarantee payment by Grantee of all claims and liens against City or any, public property, and taxes due to City, which arise by reason of the construction, operation, maintenance or use of the Cable System. 9.2 Rights. The rights reserved by City with respect to the bond are in addition to all other rights the City may have under this Franchise or any other law. 9.3 Reduction of Bond Amount. City may, in its sole discretion, reduce the amount of the bond. 25 20333190 SECTION 10 SECURITY FUND 10.1 Security Fund. If there is an uncured breach by Grantee of a materi al provision of this Franchise or a pattern of repeated violations of any provision(s) of this Franchise, then Grantee shall, upon written request, establish and provide to the City, as security for the faithful performance by Grantee of all of the provisions of this Franchise, a letter.of credit from a financial institution satisfactory to the City in the,amount of Twenty Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($20,000.00). In no event shall Grantee fail to_ post a Twenty Thousand and No/ 100 Dollar ($20,000.00) letter of credit within thirty (30) days receipt of a notice of franchise . violation - pursuant to this Section . 10.1. Failure to post said letter of credit shall constitute a separate . material violation of this Franchise, unless the breach is cured within such thirty (30) Day period or longer period-allowed under the Franchise. The letter of credit- shall serve as a commori'security fund for the faithful performance by Grantee of all the provisions of this Franchise and compliance with all orders, permits and directions of the City and the payment by Grantee of any claim, Iiens,.costs, expenses and taxes due the City which arise by reason of the construction, operation or maintenance of the Cable System. Interest on this deposit shall be paid to Grantee by the bank on an annual basis. The security maybe terminated by the Grantee upon the resolution of the alleged noncompliance. The obligation to establish the security fund required by this paragraph is unconditional. The fund must be established in those circumstances where Grantee disputes the allegation that it is not in compliance, and maintained for the duration of the dispute. If Grantee fails to establish the security fund as required, the City may take whatever action is appropriate to require the establishment of that fund and may recover its costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, and an additional penalty of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) in that action. 10.2 Withdrawal of Funds. Provision shall be made to permit the City to withdraw funds from the security fund. Grantee shall not use the security fund for other purposes and shall not assign, pledge or otherwise use this security fund as security for any purpose. 10.3 Restoration of Funds. Within ten (10) Days after notice to it that any amount has been withdrawn by the City from the security fund pursuant to 10.4 of this section, Grantee shall deposit a sum of money sufficient to restore such security fund to the required amount. 10.4 Liquidated Damages. In addition to recovery of any monies owed by Grantee to City or damages to City as a result of any acts or omissions by Grantee pursuant' to the Franchise, City in its sole discretion may charge to and collect from the security fund the following liquidated damages: (a) For failure to provide data, documents, reports or information or to cooperate with City during an application process or System review, the liquidated damage shall be One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per Day for each Day, or part thereof, such failure occurs or continues. (b) For failure to comply with any of the provisions of this Franchise for which a penalty is not otherwise specifically provided pursuant to this Paragraph 10.4, 26 2033319v1 the liquidated damage shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00) per Day for each Day, or part thereof, such failure occurs or continues. (c) For failure to test, analyze and report on the performance of the System following a request by City, the liquidated damage shall be Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) per Day for each Day, or part thereof, such failure occurs or continues. (d) Forty -five Days following notice from City of a failure of Grantee to comply with construction, operation or maintenance standards, the liquidated damage shall be Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per Day for each Day, or part thereof, such failure occurs or continues. (e) For failure to provide the services Grantee has proposed, including but not limited to the implementation and the utilization of the Access Channels the liquidated damage shall be One Hundred Fifty ($150.00) per Day for each Day, or part thereof, such failure occurs or continues. 10.5 Each Violation a Separate Violation. Each violation of any provision of this Franchise shall be considered a separate violation for which separate liquidated damages can be imposed. 10.6 Maximum 120 Days. Any liquidated damages for any given violation shall be imposed upon Grantee for a maximum of one hundred twenty (120) Days. If after that amount of time Grantee has not cured or commenced to cure the alleged breach to the satisfaction of the City, the City may pursue all other remedies. 10.7 Withdrawal of Funds to Pay Taxes. If Grantee fails to pay to the City any taxes due and unpaid; or fails to repay to the City, any damages, costs or expenses which the City shall be compelled to pay by reason of any act or default of the Grantee in connection with this Franchise; or fails, after thirty (30) Days notice of such failure by the City to comply with any provision of the Franchise which the City reasonably determines can be remedied by an expenditure of the security, the City may then withdraw such funds from the security fund. Payments are not Franchise Fees as defined in Section 16 of this Franchise. 10.8 Procedure for Draw on Security Fund. Whenever the City finds that Grantee has allegedly violated one (1) or more terms, conditions or provisions of this Franchise, a written notice shall be given to Grantee. The written notice shall describe in reasonable detail the alleged violation so as to afford Grantee an opportunity to remedy the violation. Grantee shall have thirty (30) Days subsequent to receipt of the notice in which to correct the violation before the City may require Grantee to make payment of damages, and further to enforce payment of damages through the security fund. Grantee may, within ten (10) Days of receipt of notice, notify the City that there is a dispute as to whether a violation or failure has, in fact, occurred. Such notice by Grantee shall specify with particularity the matters disputed by Grantee and shall stay the running of the above - described time. (a) City shall hear Grantee's dispute at the next regularly scheduled or specially scheduled Council meeting. Grantee shall have the right to speak and introduce evidence. The City shall determine if Grantee has committed a violation and shall make 27 20333190 written findings of fact relative to its determination. If a violation is found, Grantee may petition for reconsideration. (b) If after hearing the dispute, the claim is upheld by the City, :the n Grantee shall have thirty (30) Days within which to remedy the violation before the City may require payment of all liquidated damages due it. 10.9 Time for Correction of Violation. The time for Grantee to correct any alleged violation may be extended by the City if the necessary action to collect the alleged violation is of such a nature or character as to require more than thirty (30) Days within which to perform provided Grantee commences corrective action within fifteen (15) Days and thereafter uses reasonable diligence, as determined by the City, to correct the violation. 10.10 , Grantee's Right to Pay Prior to . Security Fund Draw. Grantee shall have the opportunity to_make prompt payment of any assessed liquidated damages and if Grantee fails to promptly remit payment to the City, the City may resort to a draw from the security fund in accordance with the terms of this Section 10 of the Franchise. 10.11 Failure to so Replenish Security Fund. If any security fund is not so replaced, City may draw on said security fund for the whole amount thereof and hold the proceeds, without interest, and use the proceeds to pay costs incurred by City in performing and paying for any or all of the obligations, duties and responsibilities of Grantee under this Franchise that are not performed or paid for by Grantee pursuant hereto, including attorneys' fees incurred by the City in so performing and paying. The failure to so replace any security fund may also, at the option of City, be deemed a default by Grantee under this Franchise. The drawing on the security fund by City, and use of the money so obtained for payment or performance of the obligations, duties and responsibilities of Grantee which are in default, shall not be a waiver or release of such default. 10.12 Collection of Funds Not Exclusive Remedy. The collection by City of any damages or monies from the security fund shall not affect any other right or remedy available to City, nor shall any act, or failure to act, by City pursuant to the security fund, be, deemed a waiver of ahy,right of City pursuant to this Franchise or otherwise. Notwithstanding this section, however, should the City elect to impose liquidated damages, that remedy shall remain the City's exclusive remedy for the one hundred twenty (120) Day period set forth -in Section 10.6. SECTION 11 DEFAULT 11.1 Basis for Default. City shall give written notice of default to Grantee if City, in its sole discretion, determines that Grantee has: (a) Violated any material provision of this Franchise or the acceptance hereto or any rule, order, regulation or determination of the City, state or federal government, not in conflict with this Franchise; (b) Attempted to evade any provision of this Franchise or the acceptance hereof; 28 2033319v1 (c) Practiced any fraud or deceit upon City or Subscribers; (d) Made a material misrepresentation of fact in the application for or negotiation of this Franchise; or (e) Incurred a twelve (12) month or more delay in the construction schedule. 11.2 Default Procedure. If Grantee fails to cure such default within thirty (30) Days after the giving of such notice (or if such default is of such a character as to require more than thirty (30) Days within which to cure the same, and Grantee fails to commence to cure the same within said thirty (30) Day period and thereafter fails to use reasonable diligence, in City's sole opinion, to cure such default as soon as possible), then, and in any event, such default shall be a substantial breach and City may elect to terminate the Franchise. The City may place the issue of revocation and termination of this Franchise before the governing body of City at a regular meeting. If City decides there is cause or reason to terminate, the following procedure shall be followed: (a) City shall provide Grantee with a written notice of the reason or cause for proposed termination and shall allow Grantee a minimum of thirty (30) Days subsequent to receipt of the notice in which to correct the default. (b) Grantee shall be provided with an opportunity to be heard at a public hearing prior to any decision to terminate this Franchise. (c) If, after notice is given and an opportunity to cure, at Grantee's option, a public hearing is held, and the City determines there was a violation, breach, failure, refusal or neglect, the City may declare by resolution the Franchise revoked and of no further force and effect unless there is compliance within such period as the City may fix, such period may. not be less than thirty (3 0) Days provided no opportunity for compliance need be granted for fraud or misrepresentation. 11.3 Mediation. If the Grantee and City are unable to resolve a dispute through informal negotiations during the period of thirty (30) Days following the submission of the claim giving rise to the dispute by one (1) party to the other, then unless that claim has been waived as provided in the Franchise, such claim may be subject to mediation if jointly agreed upon by both parties. Unless the Grantee and City mutually agree otherwise, such mediation shall be in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association currently in effect at the time of the mediation. A party seeking mediation shall file a request for mediation with the other party to the Franchise and with the American Arbitration Association. The request may be made simultaneously with the filing of a complaint, but, in such event, mediation shall proceed in advance of legal proceedings only if the other party agrees to participate in mediation. Mutually agreed upon Mediation shall stay other enforcement remedies of the parties for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of filing, unless stayed for a longer period by agreement of the Grantee, and City. The Grantee and City shall each pay one -half of the mediator's fee and any filing fees. The mediation shall be held in the City unless another location is mutually agreed upon. Agreements reached in mediation shall be enforceable as a settlement agreement in any court 29 2033319v1 z ; .. having jurisdiction thereof. Nothing herein shall serve to modify or on anyway delay the franchise enforcement process set forth in Section 10 of this Franchise. 11.4 Failure to Enforce. Grantee shall not be relieved of any of its obligations to comply promptly with any provision of the Franchise by reason of any failure of the City to enforce prompt compliance, and City's failure to enforce shall not constitute a waiver of rights or acquiescence in Grantee's conduct. 11.5 Compliance with the Laws. (a) If any federal or state law or regulation shall require or permit City or Grantee .to perform any service or act or shall prohibit City or Grantee from performing any service `or act which may �be in conflict with the terms of this Franchise, then as soon as possible following knowledge thereof, either party shall notify the other of the point in conflict believed to exist between such law or regulation. Grantee and City shall conform to state laws-and rules regarding cable communications not later than one (1) year after they become effective, unless otherwise stated, and shall conform to federal laws and regulations regarding cable as they become effective. (b) If any term, condition or provision of this Franchise or the application thereof to any Person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder hereof and the application of such term, condition or provision to Persons or circumstances other than those as to whom'it shall be held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and this Franchise and all the terms, provisions and conditions hereof shall, in all other respects, continue to be effective and complied with provided the loss of the invalid or unenforceable clause does not substantially alter the agreement between the parties. In the event such -law, rule or regulation is subsequently repealed, rescinded, amended or otherwise changed so that the provision which had been held invalid or modified is no longer in conflict with the law, rules and regulations then in effect, said provision shall thereupon return to full force and effect and shall thereafter be binding on Grantee and City. SECTION 12 FORECLOSURE AND RECEIVERSHIP 12.1 Foreclosure. Upon the foreclosure or other judicial sale of the Cable System, Grantee shall notify the City of such fact and such notification shall :be treated as a notification that a change in control of Grantee" has taken place, and the provisions of this Franchise governing the consent to transfer or change in ownership shall apply without regard to how such transfer or change in ownership occurred. 12.2 Receivership. The City shall have the right to cancel this Franchise subject to any applicable provisions of state law, including the Bankruptcy Act, one hundred twenty (120) Days after the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take over and conduct the business of Grantee, whether in receivership, reorganization, bankruptcy or other action or proceeding, unless such receivership or trusteeship shall have been vacated prior to the expiration of said one hundred twenty (120) Days, or unless: -30 2033319v1 (a) Within one hundred twenty (120) Days after his election or appointment, such receiver or trustee shall have fully complied with all the provisions of this Franchise and remedied all defaults thereunder; and, (b) Such receiver or trustee, within said one hundred twenty (120) Days, shall have executed an agreement, duly approved by the Court having jurisdiction in the premises, whereby such receiver or trustee assumes and agrees to be bound by each and every provision of this Franchise. SECTION 13 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 13.1 Quarterly Reports. Within forty-five (45) calendar days after the end of each calendar quarter, Grantee shall submit to the City along with its Franchise Fee payment a report showing the basis for computation of such fees prepared by an officer of Grantee showing the basis for the computation of the Franchise Fees paid during that period in a form and substance substantially equivalent to Exhibit C attached hereto. This report shall separately indicate revenues received by Grantee within the City including, but not limited to such items as listed in the definition of "Gross Revenues" at Section 1 of this Franchise. 13.2 Monitoring and Compliance Reports. Upon request, but no more than once a year, Grantee shall provide a written report of any and all FCC technical performance tests for the residential network required in FCC Rules and Regulations as now or hereinafter constituted. In addition, Grantee shall provide City with copies of reports of the semi - annual test and compliance procedures established by this Franchise no later than thirty (30) Days after the completion of each series of tests. 13.3 Reports. Upon request of the City and in no event later than thirty (30) Days from the date of receipt of such request, Grantee shall, free of charge, prepare and furnish to the City, at the times and in the form prescribed, such additional reports with respect to its operation, affairs, transactions, or property, as may be reasonably necessary to ensure compliance with the terms of this Franchise. Grantee and City may in good faith agree upon taking into consideration Grantee's need for the continuing confidentiality as prescribed herein. Neither City nor Grantee shall unreasonably demand or withhold information requested pursuant with the terms of this Franchise. 13.4 Communications with Regulatory Agencies. (a) Upon written request, Grantee shall submit to City copies of any pleading, applications, notifications, communications and documents of any kind, submitted by Grantee or its Affiliates to any federal, State or local courts, regulatory agencies and other government bodies if such documents directly relate to the operations of Grantee `s Cable System within the Franchise Area. Grantee shall submit such documents to City no later than thirty (30) Days after receipt of City's request. Grantee shall not claim confidential, privileged or proprietary rights to such documents unless under federal, State, or local law such documents have been determined to be confidential by a court of competent jurisdiction, or a 31 2033319v1 federal or State agency. With respect to all other reports, documents and notifications provided to any federal, State or local regulatory agency as a routine matter in the due course of operating Grantee's Cable System within the Franchise Area, Grantee shall make such documents available to City upon City's written request. (b) In addition, Grantee and its Affiliates shall within ten (10) Days of any communication to or from any judicial or regulatory agency.regarding any alleged or actual violation of this Franchise, City regulation or other requirement relating to -the System, use its best efforts to provide the City a copy of the communication, whether specifically requested by the City to do so or not. SECTION 14 CUSTOMER SERVICE POLICIES 14.1 Response to Customers and Cooperation with City. Grantee shall promptly respond to all requests for service, repair, installation and information from Subscribers. Grantee acknowledges the City's interest in the prompt resolution of all cable complaints and shall work in close cooperation with the City to resolve complaints. 14.2 Definition of "Complaint." For the purposes of Section 14, with the exception of Subsection 14.5, a "complaint" shall mean any communication to Grantee or to the City by a Subscriber or a Person who has requested Cable Service; a Person expressing dissatisfaction with any service, performance, or lack thereof, by Grantee under the obligations of this Franchise. 14.3 Customer Service Agreement and Written Information. Grantee shall provide to Subscribers a comprehensive service agreement and information in writing for use in establishing Subscriber service.. Written information shall, at a minimum, contain the following information: (a) Services to be provided and rates for such services. (b) Billing procedures. (c) Service termination procedure. (d) Change in service notifications. (e) Liability specifications. (f) Converter /Subscriber terminal equipment policy. (g) Breach of Franchise specification. (h) How complaints are handled including Grantee's procedure for investigation and resolution of Subscriber complaints. 32 2033319x1 (i) The name, address, and phone number of the Person identified by the City as responsible for handling cable questions and complaints for the City. This information shall be prominently displayed and Grantee shall submit the information to the City for review and approval as to its content and placement on Subscriber billing statements. A copy of the written information shall be provided to each Subscriber at the time of initial Connection and any subsequent reconnection. ' 14.4 Reporting Complaints. (a) The requirements of this Section 14.4 shall be subject to federal law regarding Subscriber privacy. Grantee shall maintain all Subscriber data available for City inspection. Subscriber data shall include the date, name, address, telephone number of Subscriber complaints as well as the subject of the complaint, date and type of action taken to resolve the complaint, any additional action taken by Grantee or the Subscriber. The data shall be maintained in a way that allows for simplified access of the data by the City. (b) Subject to federal law and upon reasonable request by the City, Grantee shall, within a reasonable amount of time, provide City with such Subscriber data for its review. 14.5 Customer Service Standards. The City hereby adopts the customer service standards set forth in Part 76, §76.309 of the FCC's rules and. regulations, as amended. Grantee shall, upon request, which request shall include the reason for the request (such as complaints received or other reasonable evidence of concern), provide City with information which shall describe in detail Grantee's compliance with each and every term and provision of this Section 14.5. Grantee shall comply in all respects with the customer service requirements established by the FCC and those set forth herein. To the extent that this Franchise imposes requirements greater than those established by the FCC, Grantee reserves whatever rights it may have to recover the costs associated with compliance in any manner consistent with Applicable Law. 14.6 Local Office. Grantee shall maintain a convenient local customer service and bill payment location for matters such as receiving Subscriber payments, handling billing questions, equipment replacement and customer service information. Grantee shall comply with the standards and requirements for customer service set forth below during the term of this Franchise. 14.7 Cable System office hours and telephone availability. (a) Grantee will maintain a local, toll -free or collect call telephone access line which will be available to its Subscribers twenty -four (24) hours a Day, seven (7) Days a week. (i) Trained Grantee representatives will be available to respond to customer telephone inquiries during Normal Business Hours. (ii) After Normal Business Hours, the access line may be answered by a service or an automated response system, including an answering machine. 33 20333190 Inquiries received after Normal.-Business Hours must be responded to by a trained Grantee representative on the next business Day. (b) Under Normal Operating Conditions, telephone answer time by a customer representative, including wait time, shall not exceed thirty (30) seconds when the connection is made. If the call needs to be transferred, transfer time shall not exceed thirty (30) seconds. These standards shall be met no less than ninety percent (90 %) of the time under Normal Operating Conditions; I measured on,a quarterly basis. (c) . Grantee shall not be required to. acquire equipment or perform surveys to measure compliance with the telephone answering standards above unless an historical record of complaints indicates a clear failure to comply. (d) Under Normal Operating Conditions, the customer will receive a busy signal less than three percent (3 %) of the time. (e) ' Customer service center and bill payment locations will be open at least during Normal Business Hours and will be conveniently located. 14.8 Installations, Outages and Service Calls. Under Normal Operating Conditions, each of the following standards will be met no less than ninety -five percent (95 %) of the time measured on a quarterly basis: (a) Standard Installations will be performed within seven (7) business days after an order has been placed. "Standard" Installations are those that are located up to one hundred twenty -five (125) feet from the existing distribution system as more specifically set forth in Section 6.6(c). (b) Excluding conditions beyond the control of Grantee, Grantee will begin working on "Service Interruptions" promptly and in no event later than twenty -four (24) hours after the interruption becomes known. Grantee must begin actions to correct other Service problems the next business Day after notification of the Service problem. (c) ' The "appointment window" alternatives for Installations, Service calls, and other Installation activities will be either a specific time or, at maximum, a four (4) hour time block during Normal Business Hours. (Grantee may schedule Service calls and other Installation activities outside of Normal Business Hours for the express convenience of the customer.) (d) Grantee may not cancel an appointment with a customer after the close of business on the business Day prior to the scheduled appointment. (e) . If Grantee's representative is running late for an appointment with a customer and will not be able to keep the appointment as scheduled, the customer will be contacted. The appointment will be rescheduled, as necessary, at a time which is convenient for the customer. 34 20333190 - 14.9 Communications between Grantee and Subscribers. (a) Refunds. Refund checks will be issued promptly, but no later than either: (i) The customer's next billing cycle following resolution of the request or thirty (30) Days, whichever is earlier, or (ii) The return of the equipment supplied by Grantee if Cable Service is terminated. (b) Credits. Credits for Cable Service will be issued no later than the customer's next billing cycle following the determination that a credit is warranted. 14.10 Billing: (a) Consistent with 47 C.F.R. § 76.1619, bills will be clear, concise and understandable. Bills must be fully itemized, with itemizations including, but not limited to, Basic Cable Service and premium Cable Service charges and equipment charges. Bills will also clearly delineate all activity during the billing period, including optional charges, rebates and credits. (b) In case of a billing dispute, Grantee must respond to a written complaint from a Subscriber within thirty (30) Days. 14.11 Subscriber Information. Grantee will provide written information on each of the following areas at the.time of Installation of Service, at least annually to all Subscribers, and at any time upon request: (a) Products and Services offered; (b) Prices and options for programming services and conditions of subscription to programming and other services; (c) Installation and Service maintenance policies; (d) Instructions on how to use the Cable Service; (e) Channel positions of programming carried on the System; and (f) Billing and complaint procedures, including the address and telephone number of the City's cable office. Subscribers shall be advised of the procedures for resolution of complaints about the quality of the television signal delivered by Grantee, including the address of the responsible officer of the City. Subscribers will be notified of any changes in rates, programming services or Channel positions as soon as possible in writing. Notice must be given to Subscribers a minimum of thirty (30) Days in advance of such changes if the change is within the control of 35 2033319v1 Grantee. In addition, Grantee shall notify Subscribers thirty (30) Days in advance of any significant changes in the information required by this Section 14.11. 14.12 Notice or Rate Programming Change. In addition to the requirement of this Section 14.12 regarding advance notification to Subscribers of any changes in rates, programming services or Channel positions, Grantee shall give thirty (30) Days written notice to both Subscribers and the City before implementing any rate or Service changer Such notice shall state the precise amount of any rate change and briefly explain in readily understandable fashion the cause of the rate change (e.g., inflation,.change in external costs or the addition/deletion of Channels). When the change involves the addition or deletion of Channels, each Channel added or deleted.must be separately identified. For purposes of the carriage of digital broadcast signals, Grantee need only identify for Subscribers, the television signal added and not whether that, signal may be multiplexed during certain dayparts. 14.13 Subscriber Contracts. Grantee shall, upon written request, provide the City with any standard form residential Subscriber contract utilized by Grantee. If no such written contract exists, Grantee shall file with the City a document completely and concisely stating the length and terms -of the Subscriber contract offered to customers. The length and terms of any standard form Subscriber contract(s) shall be available for public inspection during Normal Business Hours. A list of Grantee's current Subscriber rates and charges for Cable Service shall be maintained on file with City and shall be available for public inspection. 14.14 Refund Policy. If a Subscriber's Cable Service is interrupted or discontinued, without cause, for twenty -four (24) or more consecutive hours, Grantee shall, upon request by the Subscriber, credit such Subscriber pro rata for such interruption. For this purpose, every month will be assumed to have thirty (30) Days. 14.15 Late Fees. Grantee shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws with respect to any assessment, charge, cost, fee or sum, however characterized, that Grantee imposes upon a Subscriber for late payment of a bill. The City reserves the right to enforce Grantee's compliance with all Applicable Laws to the maximum extent legally permissible. 14.16 Disputes. All Subscribers and members of the general public may direct complaints, regarding Grantee's Service or performance to the chief administrative officer of the City or the chief administrative officer's designee, which may be a board or Commission of the City. 14.17 Customer Bills. Customer bills shall be designed in such a way as to present the information contained therein clearly and comprehensibly to Customers, and in a way that (A) is not misleading and (B) does not omit material information. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 14.10, above, Grantee may, in its sole discretion, consolidate costs on Customer bills as may otherwise be permitted by Section 622(c) of the Cable Act (47 U.S.C. §542(c)). 14.18 Failure to Resolve Complaints. Grantee shall resolve a complaint within thirty (30) Days in a manner deemed reasonable by the City under the terms of the Franchise. 36 20333190 14.19 Maintain a Complaint Phone Line. Grantee shall maintain a local or toll -free telephone Subscriber complaint line, available to its Subscribers twenty -four (24) hours per Day, seven (7) Days a week. 14.20 Notification of Complaint Procedure. Grantee shall have printed clearly and prominently on each Subscriber bill and in the customer service agreement provided for in Section 14.3, the twenty -four (24) hour Grantee phone number for Subscriber complaints. Additionally, Grantee shall provide information to customers concerning the procedures to follow when they are unsatisfied with measures taken by Grantee to remedy their complaint. This information will include the phone number of the City office or Person designated to handle complaints. Additionally, Grantee shall state that complaints should be made to Grantee prior to contacting the City. 14.21 Subscriber Privacy. (a) To the extent required by Minn. Stat. §238.084 Subd. 1(s) Grantee shall comply with the following: No signals including signals of a Class IV Channel may be transmitted from a Subscriber terminal for purposes of monitoring individual viewing patterns or practices without the express written permission of the Subscriber. The request for permission must be contained in a separate document with a prominent statement that the Subscriber is authorizing the permission in full knowledge of its provisions. Such written permission shall be for a limited period of time not to exceed one (1) year which may be renewed at the option of the Subscriber. No penalty shall be invoked for a Subscriber's failure to provide or renew such permission. The permission shall be revocable at any time by the Subscriber without penalty of any kind whatsoever. (b) No information or data obtained by monitoring transmission of a signal from a Subscriber terminal, including but not limited to lists of the names and addresses of Subscribers or any lists that identify the viewing habits of Subscribers shall be sold or otherwise made available to any party other than to Grantee or its agents for Grantee's business use, and also to the Subscriber subject of that information, unless Grantee has received specific written permission from the Subscriber to make such data available. The request for permission must be contained in a separate document with a prominent statement that the Subscriber is authorizing the permission in full knowledge of its provisions. Such written permission shall be for a limited period of time not to exceed one (1) year which may be renewed at the option of the Subscriber. No penalty shall be invoked for a Subscriber's failure to provide or renew such permission. The pennission shall be revocable at any time by the Subscriber without penalty of any kind whatsoever. (c) Written permission from the Subscriber shall not be required for the conducting of system wide or individually addressed electronic sweeps for the purpose of verifying System integrity or monitoring for the purpose of billing. Confidentiality of such information shall be subject to the provision set forth in subparagraph (b) of this . section. 37 20333190 14.22 Grantee Identification. Grantee shall provide all customer service technicians and all other Grantee employees entering private property with appropriate picture identification so that Grantee employees may be easily identified by the property owners and Subscribers. SECTION 15 SUBSCRIBER PRACTICES 15.1 Subscriber Rates. There shall be no charge for disconnection of any installation or outlet. If any Subscriber fails to pay a properly due monthly Subscriber fee, or any other - properly due. fee or charge, Grantee may disconnect the Subscriber's service outlet, provided, however, that such - disconnection shall not be.effected until after the later of: (i) forty -five (45) Days after the original due date of said delinquent. fee. or charge; or (ii) ten (10) Days after delivery to Subscriber of written notice of the intent to disconnect. If a Subscriber pays before expiration of the later of (i) or (ii), Grantee shall not disconnect. After disconnection, upon payment in full of the delinquent fee or charge and the payment of a reconnection charge, Grantee, shall promptly reinstate the Subscriber's Cable Service. .15.2 Refunds to Subscribers shall be made or determined in the following manner: , (a) If Grantee fails, upon request by a Subscriber, to provide any service then being offered, Grantee shall promptly refund all deposits or advance charges paid for the service in question by said Subscriber. This provision does not alter Grantee's responsibility to Subscribers under any separate contractual agreement or relieve Grantee .of any other liability. (b) If any Subscriber terminates any monthly service because of failure of Grantee to render the service in accordance with this Franchise, Grantee shall refund to such Subscriber the proportionate share of the charges paid by the Subscriber for the services not received. This provision does not relieve Grantee of liability established in other provisions of this Franchise. (c) If any Subscriber terminates any monthly service prior to the end of a prepaid period, a proportionate amount of any prepaid Subscriber service fee, using the number of days as a basis, shall be refunded to the Subscriber by Grantee. SECTION 16 - COMPENSATION AND' FINANCIAL PROVISIONS. 16.1 Franchise Fees. During the term of the Franchise, Grantee shall pay to the City a Franchise Fee of five percent (5 %) of Gross Revenues. If any such law, regulation or valid rule alters the five percent (5 %) Franchise Fee ceiling enacted by the Cable Act, then the City shall have the authority to (but shall not be required to) in the Franchise Fee accordingly, provided such increase is for purposes not inconsistent with Applicable Law. In the event Grantee bundles or combines Cable Services (which are subject to the Franchise Fee) with non- Cable Services (which are not subject to the Franchise Fee) so that Subscribers pay a single fee for more than one (1) class of service resulting in a discount on Cable Services, Grantee agrees that for the purpose of calculation of the Franchise Fee, it shall allocate to Cable Service revenue 38 2033319v1 no less than a pro rata share of the revenue received for the bundled or combined services. The pro rata share shall be computed on the basis of the published charge for each service in the bundled or combined classes of services when purchased separately. (a) Franchise Fees shall be paid quarterly not later than forty-five (45) Days following the end of a given quarter. In accordance with Section 16 of this Franchise, Grantee shall file with the City a Franchise Fee payment worksheet, attached as Exhibit C, signed by an authorized representative of Grantee, which identifies Gross Revenues earned by Grantee during the period for which payment is made. No acceptance of any payment shall be construed as an accord that the amount paid is, in fact, the correct amount, nor shall such acceptance of payment be construed as a release of any claim which the City may have for further or additional sums payable under the provisions of this section. (b) Neither current nor previously paid Franchise Fees shall be subtracted from the Gross Revenue amount upon which Franchise Fees are calculated and due for any period, unless otherwise required by Applicable Law. (c) Any Franchise Fees owing pursuant to this Franchise which remain unpaid more than forty -five (45) Days after the dates specified herein shall be delinquent and shall thereafter accrue interest at twelve percent (12 %) per annum or two percent (2 %) above prime lending rate as quoted by the Wall Street Journal, whichever is greater. 16.2 Auditing and Financial Records. Throughout the term of this Franchise, the Grantee agrees that the City, upon reasonable prior written notice of twenty (20) Days to the Grantee, may review such of the Grantee's books and records regarding the operation of the Cable System and the provision of Cable Service in the Franchise Area which are reasonably necessary to monitor and enforce Grantee's compliance with the provisions of this Franchise. Grantee shall provide such requested information as soon as possible and in no event more than thirty (30) Days unless Grantee explains that it is not feasible to meet this timeline and provides a written explanation for the delay and an estimated reasonable date for when such information will be provided. All such documents pertaining to financial matters that may be the subject of an inspection by the City shall be retained by the Grantee for a minimum period of seven (7) years, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 541.05. The Grantee shall not deny the City access to any of the Grantee's records on the basis that the Grantee's records are under the control of any parent corporation, Affiliated entity or a third party. The City may request in writing copies of any such records or books that are reasonably necessary, and the Grantee shall provide such copies within thirty (30) Days of the receipt of such request. One (1) copy of all reports and records required under this or any other section shall be furnished to the City at -the sole expense of the Grantee. If the requested books and records are too voluminous, or for security reasons cannot be copied or removed, then the Grantee may request, in writing within ten (10) Days of receipt of such request, that the City inspect them at the Grantee's local offices or at one of Grantee's offices more convenient to City or its duly authorized agent. If any books or records of the Grantee are not kept in such office and not made available in copies to the City upon written request as set forth above, and if the City determines that an examination of such records is necessary for the enforcement of this Franchise, then all reasonable travel expenses incurred in making such examination shall be paid by the Grantee. 39 2033319v1 _ -_ :.Y .:. ...._ _ ....... _.. .. .._ . .... .... 16.3 Review of Record Keeping Methodology. Grantee agrees to meet with representative of the City upon request.to review its methodology of record - keeping, financial reporting, computing Franchise Fee obligations, and other procedures the understanding of which the City deems necessary for understanding the meaning of reports and records. 16.4 Audit of Records. The City or its authorized agent may at an y time and at the City's own expense conduct an independent audit of the revenues of Grantee in order to verify the accuracy of Franchise Fees paid to the City. Grantee and each parent company of Grantee shall cooperate fully in the conduct of such audit. In the event it is determined through such audit that Grantee has underpaid Franchise Fees in an amount of five percent (5 %) or more than was due the City, then Grantee shall reimburse the City for the entire cost of the audit within thirty (30) days of the completion and acceptance of the audit by the City. 16.5 Records to be reviewed. The City agrees to request access to only those books and records, in exercising its rights under this section, which it deems reasonably necessary for the enforcement and administration of the Franchise. 16.6 Indemnification by Grantee. Grantee shall, at its sole expense, fully indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and in their capacity as such, the officers and employees thereof, from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, liability and judgments for damage or otherwise except those arising wholly from negligence on the part of the City or its employees; for actual or alleged injury to persons or property, including loss of use of property due to an occurrence, whether or not such property is physically damaged or destroyed, in any way arising out of or through or alleged to arise out of or through the acts or omissions of Grantee or its officers, agents, employees, or contractors or to which Grantee's or its officers, agents, employees or contractors acts or omissions in any way contribute, and whether or not such acts or omissions were authorized or contemplated by this Franchise or Applicable Law; arising out of. or alleged to arise out of any claim for damages for Grantee's invasion of the right of privacy, defamation of any Person, firm or corporation, or the violation of infringement of any copyright, trademark, trade name, service mark or patent, or of any other right of any Person, firm or corporation; arising out of or alleged to arise out of Grantee's failure to, comply with the provisions of any Applicable Law. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prevent the City, its officers_, or its employees from participating in the defense of any litigation by their own counsel at such parties' expense. Such participation shall not under any circumstances relieve Grantee from its duty of defense, against liability or of paying any judgment entered against the City, its officers, or its employees. . 16.7 Grantee Insurance. Upon the Effective Date, Grantee shall, at its sole expense take out and maintain during the term of this Franchise public liability insurance with a company licensed to do business in the state of Minnesota with a rating by A.M. Best & Co. of not less than "A-" that shall protect the Grantee, City and its officials, officers, directors, employees and agents from claims which may arise from operations under this Franchise, whether such operations be by the Grantee, its officials, officers, directors, employees and agents or any subcontractors of Grantee. This liability insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury and damage to property, resulting from Grantee's vehicles, products and operations. The amount of insurance for single 40 2033319v1 limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury and property damage shall not be less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000). The liability policy shall include: (a) The policy shall provide coverage on an "occurrence" basis. (b) The policy shall cover personal injury as well as bodily injury. (c) The policy shall cover blanket contractual liability subject to the standard universal exclusions of contractual liability included in the carrier's standard endorsement as to bodily injuries, personal injuries and property damage.. (d) Broad form property damage liability shall be afforded. (e) City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. (f) An endorsement shall be provided which states that the coverage is primary insurance with respect to claims arising from Grantee's operations under this Franchise and that no other insurance maintained by the Grantor will be called upon to contribute to a loss under this coverage. (g) Standard form of cross - liability shall be afforded. (h) An endorsement stating that the policy shall not be canceled without thirty (30) Days notice of such cancellation given to City (i) City reserves the right to adjust the insurance limit coverage requirements of this Franchise no more than once every three (3) years. Any such adjustment by City will be no greater than the increase in the State of Minnesota Consumer Price Index (all consumers) for such three (3) year period. 0) Upon the Effective Date, Grantee shall submit to City a certificate documenting the required insurance, as well as any necessary properly executed endorsements. The certificate and documents evidencing insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and shall provide satisfactory evidence that Grantee has complied with all insurance requirements. Renewal certificates shall be provided to City prior to the expiration date of any of the required policies. City will not be obligated, however, to review such endorsements or certificates or other evidence of insurance, or to advise Grantee of any deficiencies in such documents and receipt thereof shall not relieve Grantee from, nor be deemed a waiver of, City's right to enforce the terms of Grantee's obligations hereunder. City reserves the right to examine any policy provided for under this paragraph or to require further documentation reasonably necessary to form an opinion regarding the adequacy of Grantee's insurance coverage. 41 20333190 17.1 Posting and Publication. Grantee shall assume the cost of posting and publication of,this Franchise as such posting and publication is required by law and such is payable upon Grantee's filing of acceptance of this Franchise. 17.2 Guarantee of Performance. Grantee agrees that it enters into this Franchise voluntarily in order to secure and in consideration of the grant from the City of a ten (10) year Franchise. Performance pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Franchise is guaranteed by Grantee. 17.3 Entire Agreement. This Franchise contains the entire agreement between the parties, supersedes all prior agreements or. proposals except as specifically set forth herein, and cannot be changed orally but only by an instrument in'writing executed by the parties. This Franchise is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238 and the City Code and is intended to comply with all requirements set forth therein. 17.4 ' Consent. Wherever the consent or approval of either Grantee or the City is specifically required in this agreement, such consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 17.5 Prior Franchise Terminated. The cable television franchise as originally granted by Ordinance No. 1996 -5 is hereby terminated. 17.6 Franchise Acceptance. No later than forty -five (45) Days following City Council approval of this Franchise, Grantee shall execute and return to the City three (3) original franchise agreements. The executed agreements shall be returned to the City accompanied by performance bonds, security funds, and evidence of insurance, all as provided in this Franchise. In the event Grantee fails to accept this Franchise, or fails to provide the required documents, this Franchise shall be null and void. The Grantee agrees that despite the fact that its written acceptance may occur after the Effective Date, the obligations of this Franchise shall become effective on August 1, 2012. 17.7 Amendment of Franchise. Grantee and City may agree, from time to time, to amend this Franchise. Such written amendments may be made subsequent to a review session pursuant to Section 2.6 or at any other time if City and Grantee agree that such an amendment will be in the public interest or if such an amendment is required due to changes in federal, state or local laws; provided, however, nothing herein shall restrict City's exercise of its police powers. 17.8 Notice. Any notification that requires a response or action from a party to this Franchise, within a specific time -frame or would trigger a timeline that would affect one or both parties' rights under this Franchise, shall be made in writing and shall be sufficiently given and served upon the other party by hand delivery, first class mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or by reputable overnight courier service and addressed as follows: 20333190 To the City: City Manager, City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To the Grantee: Comcast Regional Vice President of Operations 10 River Park Place St. Paul, MN 55107 Recognizing the widespread usage and acceptance of electronic forms of communication, emails and faxes will be acceptable as formal notification related to the conduct of general business amongst the parties to this contract, including but not limited to programming and price adjustment communications. Such communication should be addressed and directed to the Person of record as specified above. 17.9 Force Majeure. In the event that either party is prevented or delayed in the performance of any of its obligations, under this Franchise by reason of acts of God, floods, fire, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, or other unavoidable casualties, insurrection, war, riot, vandalism, strikes, delays in receiving permits where it is not the fault of Grantee, public easements, sabotage, acts or omissions of the other party, or any other similar event beyond the reasonable control of that party, it shall have a reasonable time under the circumstances to perform such obligation under this Franchise, or to procure a substitute for such obligation to the reasonable satisfaction of the other party. 17.10 Work of Contractors and Subcontractors. Work by contractors and subcontractors is subject to the same restrictions, limitations and conditions as if the work were performed by Grantee. Grantee shall be responsible for all work performed by its contractors and subcontractors, and others performing work on its behalf as if the work were performed by it and shall ensure that all such work is performed in compliance with this Franchise, the City Code and other Applicable Law, and shall be jointly and severally liable for all damages and correcting all damage caused by them. It is Grantee's responsibility to ensure that contractors, subcontractors or other Persons performing work on Grantee's behalf are familiar with the requirements of this Franchise, the City Code and other Applicable Laws governing the work performed by them. 17.11 Abandonment of System. Grantee may not abandon the System or any portion thereof without having first given three (3) months written notice to City and conforming to the City Code, as well as the state right -of -way rules, Minn. Rules, Chapter 7819. To the extent required by Minn. Stat. §238.084 Subd. 1 (w), Grantee shall compensate City for damages resulting from the abandonment. 17.12 Removal After Abandonment. In the event of Grantee's abandonment of the System, City shall have the right to require Grantee to conform to the City Code, as well as the state right -of -way rules, Minn. Rules, Chapter 7819. If Grantee has failed to commence removal of System, or such part thereof as was designated by City, within thirty (30) Days after written notice of City's demand for removal consistent with City Code and Minn. Rules, Ch. 7819, is given, or if Grantee has failed to complete such removal within twelve (12) months after written notice of City's demand for removal is given City shall have the right to apply funds secured by 43 20333190 the performance bond toward removal and/or declare all right, title, and interest to the System to be in City with all rights of ownership including, but not limited to, the right to operate the System or transfer the System to another for operation by it. 17.13 Governing Law. This Franchise shall be deemed to be executed in the State of Minnesota, and shall be governed in all respects, including validity, interpretation and effect, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Minnesota, as applicable to contracts entered into and. performed entirely within the State. 17.14 Nonenforcement by City.. Grantee shall not be relieved of its obligation to comply with any of the provisions of this Franchise by reason of any failure of the City or to enforce prompt compliance. 17.15 Captions. The paragraph captions and headings in this Franchise are for convenience and reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning of interpretation of this Franchise. 17.16 Calculation of Time. Where the performance or doing of any act, duty, matter, payment or thing is required hereunder and the period of time or duration for the performance is prescribed and fixed herein, the time shall be computed so as to exclude the first and include the last Day of the prescribed or fixed period or duration of time. When the last Day of the period falls on Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday, that Day shall be omitted from the computation and the next business Day shall be the last Day of the period. 17.17 Survival of Terms. Upon the termination or forfeiture of the Franchise, Grantee shall no longer have the right to occupy the Streets for the purpose of providing Cable Service. However, Grantee's obligations to the City (other than the obligation to provide service to. Subscribers) shall survive according to their terms. 17.18 Competitive Equity If any other Wireline MVPD enters into any agreement with the City to provide multi channel video programming or its equivalent to residents in the City, the City, upon written request of the Grantee, shall permit the Grantee to construct and/or operate its Cable System and provide multi channel video programming or its equivalent to Subscribers in the City under the same agreement as applicable to the new MVPD. Within one hundred twenty (120) Days after the Grantee submits a written request to the City, the Grantee and the City shall enter into an agreement or other appropriate authorization (if necessary).containing the same terms and conditions as are applicable to the new Wireline MVPD. Passed and adopted this day of 2012. , ATTEST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: By: Its: City Clerk Its: Mayor 44 20333190 45 2033319v1 Exhibit A Free Cable Service to Public Buildings 1. SCHOOL,ST PETER 5421 FRANCE AVE S 2. JUNIOR HIGH,SOUTHVIEW 4725 S VIEW LN 3. CITY HALL,EDINA 4801 W 50TH ST 4. COMM CENTER,EDINA 5701 NORMANDALE RD 5. ELEMENTARY,CONCORD 5900 CONCORD AVE 6. EDINBOROUG PARK,* 7700 YORK AVE S 7. ELEM,CREEK VALLEY 6401 GLEASON RD 8. MIDDLE SCHOOL,VALLEY V 6750 VALLEY VIEW RD 9. HIGH SCHOOL,EDINA 6754 VALLEY VIEW RD 10. ELEMENTARY,CORNELIA 7000 CORNELIA DR 11. LIBRARY,SOUTHDALE 7001 YORK AVE S 12. ELEMENTARY,HIGHLAND 5505 DONCASTER WAY 13. ELEMENTARY,COUNTRYSIDE 5701 BENTON AVE 14. GOLF COURSE,BRAEMAR 6364 JOHN HARRIS DR STE 2 15. STATION,EDINA FIRE 7335 YORK AVE S 16. ICE ARENA,BREMER 7501 IKOLA WAY 17. MAINT SHED,BRAEMAR 7401 BRAEMAR BLVD 18. LIBRARY, EDINA 5280 GRANDVIEW SQ 19. FIRE STATION,EDINA 6250 TRACY AVE 20. PUBLIC WORKS,EDINA 7450 METRO BLVD 21. ELEMENTARY,NORMANDALE 5701 NORMANDALE RD 22. 1 SENIOR CENTER,EDINA 5280 GRANDVIEW SQ 23. 1 GOLF COURSE,FRED RICHARDS 7640 PARKLAWN AVE A -1 20333190 /S G Chu'in 115. 0;� r��y�■n.y'�.. ,� 7 �� �r- ( � � � 1 u +�. �.. tp t � •'n c �y �y In.. .,. ._� � "S ! ai.1, «C. IS i11i 1 +fit ` •)� r', ` x.Y ` , . OSe. _ � _ G ,f:.i� E � ,� W Y . Gar�c`n Pal x � S v `• .. �., . .. - r I f ! i ... II ... � -. .:. -: ... � ( L .. t _.. i Exhibit C Franchise Fee Payment Worksheet TRADE SECRET — CONFIDENTL4L Fee Factor: 5% C -1 20333190 Month/Year Month/Year Month/Year Total A la Carte Video Services Audio Services Basic Cable Service. Installation Charge , Bulk Revenue Expanded Basic Cable Service Pay Service Pay -per -view Guide Revenue Franchise Fee Revenue Advertising Revenue Home Shopping Revenue Digital Services Inside Wiring Other Revenue Equipment Rental Processing Fees PEG Fee FCC Fees Bad Debt Late Fees REVENUE Fee Calculated Fee Factor: 5% C -1 20333190 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -14 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO COMCAST OF ARKANSAS / FLORIDA / LOUISIANA / MINNESOTA / MISSISSIPPI / TENNESSEE, INC. ("GRANTEE" OR "COMCAST'j TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A CABLE SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS ACCOMPANYING THE GRANT OF THE FRANCHISE; PROVIDING FOR REGULATION AND USE OF THE SYSTEM AND THE PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY; AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS HEREIN. On July 17. 2012, the City of Edina, Minnesota ("City's adopted an Ordinance granting a Cable Television Franchise.to Comcast. The Ordinance serves two purposes. First, it is intended to provide for and specify the means to attain the best possible cable service for the public by providing requirements for cable with respect to technical standards, customer service obligations, and related matters. Second, it grants a non - exclusive cable franchise to Comcast to operate, construct and maintain a cable system within the City and contains specific requirements for Comcast to do so. The Ordinance includes the following: 1) requires Comcast to maintain a 750 MHz capacity cable system; 2) imposes on Comcast a franchise fee of five percent (5 %) of Comcast's annual gross revenues; 3) establishes a franchise term of ten (10) years; 4) provides a list of schools and public buildings entitled to receive complimentary cable service; 5) requires Comcast to dedicate channel capacity for public, educational and governmental programming and provides capital support of such channels; 6) mandates customer service standards regarding Comcast's provision of cable services; and 7) requires a performance bond and security fund to enforce Comcast's compliance with the Ordinance. It is hereby determined that publication of this title and summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of Ordinance 2012 -14. A copy of the entire Ordinance shall be posted at the Edina City Hall. It is hereby directed that only the above title and summary of Ordinance 2012 -14 be published, conforming to Minn. Stat. §331A.01, with the following: NOTICE Persons interested in reviewing a complete copy of the Ordinance may do so at the City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 during the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Yes No Mayor Hovland Councilmember Bennett Councilmember Brindle Councilmember Sprague Councilmember Swenson Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Thursday, June 7, 2012 Send two Affidavits of Publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk 20347141 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -14 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO COMCAST OF ARKANSAS / FLORIDA / LOUISIANA / MINNESOTA / MISSISSIPPI / TENNESSEE, INC. ("GRANTEE" OR " COMCAST'� TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A CABLE SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS ACCOMPANYING THE GRANT OF THE FRANCHISE; PROVIDING FOR REGULATION AND USE OF THE SYSTEM AND THE PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY; AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS HEREIN. On July 17" 2012, the City of Edina, Minnesota ("City'l adopted an Ordinance granting a Cable Television Franchise to Comcast. The Ordinance serves two purposes. First, it is intended to: provide for and specify the means to attain the best possible cable service for the public' by providing -requirements for cable with respect to technical standards, customer service obligations, and related matters. Second, it grants a non - exclusive cable franchise to Comcast to operate, construct and maintain a cable system within the City and contains specific requirements for Comcast to do so. The Ordinance includes the following: 1) requires Comcast to maintain a 750 MHz capacity cable system; 2) imposes on Comcast a franchise fee of five percent (5 %) of Comcast's annual gross revenues; 3) establishes a franchise term of ten (10) years; 4) provides a list of schools and public buildings entitled to receive complimentary cable service; 5) requires Comcast to dedicate channel capacity for public, educational and governmental programming and provides capital support of such channels; 6) mandates customer service standards regarding Comcast's provision of cable services; and 7) requires a performance bond and security fund to enforce Comcast's compliance with the Ordinance. It is hereby determined that publication of this title and summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of Ordinance 2012 -14. A copy of the entire Ordinance shall be posted at the Edina City Hall. It is hereby directed that only the above title and summary of Ordinance 2012 -14 be published, conforming to Minn. Stat. §331A.01, with the following: NOTICE Persons interested in-reviewing a complete copy of the Ordinance may do so at the City Hall at 4801 West, 50th Street; Edina, MN 55424 during the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Yes No Mayor Hovland Councilmember Bennett Councilmember Brindle Councilmember Sprague Councilmember Swenson Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the.Edina Sun Current on: Thursday, July 26, 2012 Send two Affidavits of Publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk 20347141 ORDINANCE NO. 2012 -13 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE CABLE TELEVISION REGULATORY ORDINANCE Whereas, the City Code at Edina currently contains a Cable Television Regulatory Ordnance ("Regulatory Ordinance') which governs the provision of cable services by cable operators in the City of Edina, Minnesota ("City'; and Whereas, on July 17, 2012 the City adopted Ordinance No.2012 -14 granting a Cable Television Franchise ("Franchise') to Comcast of Arkansas / Florida / Louisiana / Minnesota / Mississippi / Tennessee, Inc., ("Comcast'l to provide cable services and maintain and operate a cable communications system within the City; and Whereas, the Franchise incorporates all of the key provisions of the Regulatory Ordinance that the City may still enforce under applicable law thereby eliminating the need to maintain the Regulatory Ordinance as part of the City Code. Now therefore, the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby ordains: Section 1. Retained Ordinance No. 1120 of the City Code - The Cable Television Regulatory Ordinance is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon passage and publication. First Reading: July 17, 2012 Second Reading: Waived Published: July 26, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Thursday, July 26, 2012 Send two Affidavits of Publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk 2034715v1 e REPORTIRECOMMEN DATION To: City Council Agenda Item Item No. VIII. C. From: John Keprios, Director Parks & Recreation Department ® Action Discussion Information Date: June 12, 2012 Subject: Edinborough Park Study Recommendations ACTION REQUESTED: Review and discuss the staff recommendation to improve the cost recovery percentage at Edinborough Park. The recommended plan keeps the pool and fitness facilities, renovates the current locker rooms, adds a locker room, and reduces operating expenses by reducing trees and plants. All Park user fees will be increased, including admissions, birthday parties and pool rental. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Park Board and City Council held joint work sessions on January 3rd, 2012 and March 20th, 2012 to review reports prepared by the consulting team of ATS &R and Ballard *King which made recommendations to improve the cost recovery rate of Edinborough Park. At the conclusion of the March, 20th, 2012 work session, staff was asked to prepare a recommendation to the Park Board and the City Council. Staff made a presentation of a recommendation to the Park Board on June 12, 2012. The Park Board was asked for their review and comment only. Staff is recommending several changes to Edinborough Park in an attempt to: • Increase the cost recovery percentage • Improve the function of the pool, locker rooms and lower level of the Park (grotto) • Increase handicap accessibility • Increase Edina resident use of the pool and playpark • Provide much needed updates to the facility The recommendation includes the following: POOL • Keep the pool and fitness facility • Complete capital improvement updates needed to replace the pool shell and replace the pool deck the and wall the and add air conditioning in the track. • Renovate the locker rooms to add a new locker room in the space of the existing pool storage room and combine the current men's and women's locker room into one large locker room. PARK • Remove large trees in Park — approximately 38 trees. Many of the trees are from the original construction of the Park and have either outlived their life expectancy or have become so large that they are looking tired and have become a safety hazard. Most tall Norfolk Pines are being held up by support cables. The large trees were not expected to live more than 7 years in the indoor Park setting. Many have been there over 25 years. • Renovate the lighting system to significantly improve energy efficiency and significantly reduce energy costs. This becomes an option with the removal of the large trees. The large trees require the existing lighting qualities-and levels. • Reduced staffing levels needed for horticultural maintenance. • Fill in the lower level of the grotto. This would eliminate our handicap accessibility barrier and provide a much larger, more usable space. The lower pond would be filled in, reducing maintenance costs; however, public art displays could be added. INCREASE REVENUES • Increase the pool /track and playpark daily admission rate by $1.07 per person (from $6.44 to $7.51) and increase the 10 admissions pass by $10.73 (from $53.64 to $64.37). • Increase the weekend Adventure Package birthday party rate from $139.46 to $151.19 and increase the weekday Peak Package birthday rate from $85.82 to $96.55. The Edina Swim Club is willing to make a large financial and time commitment to rent additional pool time. Edinborough's pool would become "home" to the Edina Swim Club. The proposed annual financial commitment from the swim club is $53,010 for a 43 week season. Increase the pool rental fee from $30 /hour to $45 /hour or $7.50 /hour /lane. This proposal requires a much smaller capital expenditure than the option to fill in the pool. $582,000 is required to provide lager. locker rooms and $189,500 is needed to resurface pool and replace wall and deck tile. It would cost $1;654,100 to fill. in the pool, provide al toddler play structure and add birthday party /meeting rooms: This option, while keeping the pool, also maintains a valuable community asset for kids; �ad,ults`and seniors. Filing -in the pool would provide significant assets in a toddler play space and much improved birthday party /meeting rooms. The cost recovery for this option is 86% in 2014 and 72% in 2018, compared to 84% in 2014 and 70% in 2018 for the pool option. Staff believes.that we may have an opportunity to negotiate continued association fees with Marriott, Edina Park Plaza, the Edinborough Condo Association and Corporate East. City Attorney Roger Knutson prepared an addendum to our existing 30 year agreements that would extend those contracts for another seven years. They would be renewable again after those seven years expire. Director Keprios, Manager Faus and Assistant Director Kattreh met with representative from all four associations on July 11th, All representatives responded favorably and stated that they would pass the contract renewal on to their decision makers and respond to us as soon as possible. Renewed association revenues are not factored into the budget projections. ATTACHMENTS: A. Financial Projections B. June 12, 2012 Park Board Minutes �' p V1 o O0 CORPORA 1888 Edinborough Park Study Financial Projections Page 1 - Baseline Projections Page 3 - Pool and Track/Fitness Option Page 5 - Playpark Option Page 7 - Playpark and Artwalk Option Page 1 Concrete repairs EP -09 -016 Replaster Pool EDINBOROUGH PARK Track Air Conditioning EP -11 -005 Exterior Entryway Doors EP -11 -007 Upstairs Restroom Remodel EP -11 -009 Replace Carpeting EP -06 -007 Baseline Scenario EP -09 -014 Adventure Peak Remodel EP -09 -021 Adventure Peak Wave Slide EP -11 -006 200V 2010' 2011' 2012 2013 2014 2016 2016 2017 2018 Park Boiler Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Operating revenues Facility Maintenance NEW POS System NEW Replacement Equipment NEW Hot water heater & holding tanks NEW Scissors lift NEW Concessions sales $ 29,386 $ 29,328 $ 52,975 $ 175,000 $ 185,000 $ 189,600 $ 194,300 $ 199,200 $ 204,200 $ 209,300 Memberships 57,078 52,515 54,436 56,000 56,000 57,400 58,800 60,300 61,800 63,300 Admissions 563,735 569,591 654,971 550,000 550,000 563,800 577,900 592,300 607,100 622,300 Building rental 143,442 163,492 208,865 150,000 150,000 153,800 157,600 161,500 165,500 169,600 Equipment rental 7,814 11,397 15,261 8,500 8,500 8,700 8,900 9,100 9,300 9,500 Association fees 203,245 217,122 202,423 212,100 214,200 224,800 228,700 232,700 200,300 47,200 Total revenues 1,004,700 1,043,445 1,188,931 1,151,600 1,163,700 1,198,100 1,226,200 1,255,100 1,248,200 1,121,200 Operating expenses COGS 40,055 42,164 70,603 99,000 105,000 107,600 110,300 113,100 115,900 118,800 Personal services 666,921 677,701 637,146 783,210 797,479 821,400 846,000 871,400 897,500 924,400 - Staffing reduction - - - - (17,000) (17,500) (18,000) (18,500) (19,100) (19,700) Contractual services 386,027 316,198 308,998 331,500 335,000 343,400 352,000 360,800 369,800 379,000 Commodities 175,145 148,342 169,991 182,200 187,700 192,400 197,200 202,100 207,200 212,400 Central services 39,573 38,495 51,850 56,424 57,096 58,500 60,000 61,500 63,000 64,600 Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 159,500 166,700 182,400 197,100 213,300 232,000 243,100 Total expenses 1,406,471 1,351,894 1,398,787 1,611,834 1,631,975 1,688,200 1,744,600 1,803,700 1,866,300 1,922,600 Operating loss (401,771) (308,449) (209,856) (460,234) (468,275) (490,100) (518,400) (548,600) (618,100) (801,400) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest income 37,364 73,650 95,866 40,500 32,700 24,600 16,100 7,000 (2,900) (14,500) Miscellaneous 1,125 - - - - - - - - - Transfers 250,000 102,091 150,963 125,000 271,700 209,100 172,300 253,900 169,700 183,300 Total nonoperating 288,489 175,741 246,829 165,500 304,400 233,700 188,400 260,900 166,800 168,800 Change in net assets (113,282) (132,708) 36,973 (294,734) (163,875) (256,400) (330,000) (287,700) (451,300) (632,600) January I net assets - - 2,636,318 2,341,584 2,177,709 1,921,309 1,591,309 1,303,609 852,309 December 31 net assets $ 2,636,318 $ 2,341,584 $ 2,177,709 $ 1,921,309 $ 1,591,309 $ 1,303,609 $ 852,309 $ 219,709 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ (113,282) $ (132,708) $ 36,973 $ (294,734) $ (163,875) $ (256,400) $ (330,000) $ (287,700) $ (451,300) $ (632,600) Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 159,500 166,700 182,400 197,100 213,300 232,000 243,100 Capital expenditures (512,510) (194,949) (179,628) (125,000) (271,700) (209,100) (172,300) (253,900) (169,700) (183,300) Other accruals (117,470) 29,854 Change In cash (644,512) (168,809) 17,544 (260,234) (268,875) (283,100) (305,200) (328,300) (389,000) (572,800) January 1 cash - 1,350,112 1,089,878 821,003 537,903 232,703 (95,597) (484,597) December 31 cash $ 1,350,112 $ 1,089,878 $ 821,003 $ 537,903 $ 232,703 $ (95,597) $ (484,597) $ (1,057,397) Expense recovery 71% 77% 85% 71% 71% 71% 70% 70% 67% 58% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed Inflation 2.50% Concrete repairs EP -09 -016 Replaster Pool EP -00 -017 Track Air Conditioning EP -11 -005 Exterior Entryway Doors EP -11 -007 Upstairs Restroom Remodel EP -11 -009 Replace Carpeting EP -06 -007 Lift to Birthday Party Area EP -09 -014 Adventure Peak Remodel EP -09 -021 Adventure Peak Wave Slide EP -11 -006 Interior Entryway Doors EP -11 -008 Pool Boiler EP -12 -002 Security Camera System EP- 08-007 Track Floor EP -09 -015 North Sidewalk EP -10 -011 Park Boiler EP -12 -003 Pool and Wall Tile EP -08 -021 Adventure Peak Renovation EP -11 -010 Pond and Waterfall Renovation EP -12 -004 Fill in tree rings NEW Window washing NEW Facility Maintenance NEW POS System NEW Replacement Equipment NEW Hot water heater & holding tanks NEW Scissors lift NEW Facility Repair NEW Total 32,300 125,000 71,800 66,600 82,000 30,800 12,600 42,000 26,300 26,300 63,000 12,600 43,100 70,000 32,300 26,900 88,300 33,100 22,100 20,500 26.300 110,400 28,300 141,400 23,200 15,100 145,000 $ 125,000 $ 271,700 $ 209,100 $ 172,300 $ 253,900 $ 169,700 $ 183,300 Edinborough Park's finances were combined with Centennial Lakes In one fund through 2011 and were separated into two funds starting in 2012. In order to show comparative historical data in this format, certain assumptions and estimates were made by the Finance Department for fiscal years 2009 -2011. 6/4/2012 G:\Budget\2013 Budget \Edinborough study \Edinborough study.xisx $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 a c m a $- u $(500,000) $(1,000,000) $(1,500,000) Estimated 2009* �. Expense recovery 71% Cash balance Edinborough Park Baseline Scenario Assumed 2012 -2018 Construction Fund Subsidy of $1,385,000 ♦ ♦ 58% Projected 2014 Estimated 2010* Estimated 2011* Estimated 2012 Projected 2013 77% 85% 71% 71% $232,703 $1,350,112 $1,089,878 $821,003 Projected 2014 Projected 2015 Projected 2016 Projected 2017 71% 70% 70% 67% $537,903 $232,703 $(95,597) $(484,597) Projected 2018 58% $(1,057,397) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% a 'o 50% 40% x 30% 20% 10% 0% Page 3 EDINBOROUGH PARK Pool and Track/Fitness Option 2009' 2010' 2011' 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Operating revenues Concessions sales $ 29,386 $ 29,328 $ 52,975 $ 175,000 $ 185,000 $ 165,000 $ 189,600 $ 194,300 $ 199,200 $ 204,200 Memberships 57,078 52,515 54,436 56,000 56,000 60,000 61,500 63,000 64,600 66,200 Admissions 563,735 569,591 654,971 550,000 550,000 563,800 577,900 592,300 607,100 622,300 Rate increase - - - - 76,000 77,900 79,800 81,800 83,800 85,900 Building rental 143,442 163,492 208,865 150,000 150,000 153,800 157,600 161,500 165,500 169,600 -Rate increase - - - - - 26,000 26,700 27,400 28,100 28,800 -Swim club - - - - - 53,000 54,300 55,700 57,100 58,500 Equipment rental 7,814 11,397 15,261 8,500 8,500 12,000 12,300 12,600 12,900 13,200 Association fees 203,245 217,122 202,423 212,100 214,200 224,800 228,700 232,700 200,300 47,200 Total revenues 1,004,700 1,043,445 1,188,931 1,151,600 1,239,700 1,356,300 1,388,400 1,421,300 1,418,600 1,295,900 Operating expenses COGS 40,055 42,164 70,603 99,000 105,000 110,000 112,800 115,600 118,500 121,500 Personal services 666,921 677,701 637,146 783,210 797,479 821,400 846,000 871,400 897,500 924,400 - Staffing reduction - - - (97,000) (99,400) (101,900) (104,400) (107,000) (109,700) Contractual services 386,027 316,198 308,998 331,500 335,000 343,400 352,000 360,800 369,800 379,000 - Staffing reduction - - - - 24,000 24,600 25,200 25,800 26,400 27,100 - Lighting efficiency - - - - (40,000) (41,000) (42,000) (43,100) (44,200) (45,300) Commodities 175,145 148,342 169,991 182,200 187,700 194,400 199,300 204,300 209,400 214,600 Central services 39,573 38,495 51,850 56,424 57,096 58,500 60,000 61,500 63,000 64,600 Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 162,700 175,400 211,400 244,100 254,800 264,900 272,900 Total expenses 1,406,471 1,351,894 1,398,787 1,615,034 1,544,675 1,623,300 1,695,500 1,746,700 1,798,300 1,849,100 Operating loss (401,771) (308,449) (209,856) (463,434) (304,975) (267,000) (307,100) (325,400) (379,700) (553,200) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest income 37,364 73,650 95,866 40,500 32,700 29,800 5,200 3,500 1,500 (1,900) Miscellaneous 1,125 - - - - - - - - - Transfers 251000 102,091 150,963 210,000 364,000 125,200 172,300 143,500 186,700 183,300 Total nonoperating 288,489 175,741 246,829 250,500 396,700 155,000 177,500 147,000 188,200 181,400 Change in net assets (113,282) (132,708) 36,973 (212,934) 91,725 (112,000) (129,600) (178,400) (191,500) (371,800) January 1 net assets - 2,636,318 2,423,384 2,515,109 2,403,109 2,273,509 2,095,109 1,903,609 December 31 net assets $ 2,636,318 $ 2,423,384 $ 2,515,109 $ 2,403,109 $ 2,273,509 $ 2,095,109 $ 1,903,609 $ 1,531,809 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ (113,282) $ (132,708) $ 36,973 $ (212,934) $ 91,725 $ (112,000) $ (129,600) $ (178,400) $ (191,500) $ (371,800) Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 162,700 175,400 211,400 244,100 254,800 264,900 272,900 Capital expenditures (512,510) (194,949) (179,628) (210,000) (364,000) (917,600) (172,300) (143,500) (186,700) (183,300) Other accruals (117,470) 29,854 - - Change in cash (644,512) (168,809) 17,544 (260,234) (96,875) (818,200) (57,800) (67,100) (113,300) (282,200) January 1 cash 1,350,112 1,089,878 993,003 174,803 117,003 49,903 (63,397) December 31 cash $ 1,350,112 $ 1,089,878 $ 993,003 $ 174,803 $ 117,003 $ 49,903 $ (63,397) $ (345,597) Expense recovery 71% 77% 85% 7.1% 80% 84% 82% 81% 79% 70% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50 Lighting retrofit EP -12 -001 65,000 Pond and Waterfall Renovation EP -12 -004 20,000 Concrete repairs EP -09 -016 153,800 Replaster pool EP -00 -017 71,800 Track air conditioning EP -11 -005 66,600 Upstairs reslroom remodel EP -11 -009 30,800 Replace carpeting EP -06 -007 12,600 Lift to birthday party area EP -09 -014 42,000 Adventure Peak remodel EP -09 -021 26,300 Adventure Peak Wave Slide EP -11 -006 26,300 Pool boiler EP -12 -002 12,600 Security Camera System EP -08 -007 43,100 Track Floor EP -09 -015 70,000 North Sidewalk EP -10 -011 32,300 Park Boiler EP -12 -003 26,900 Adventure Peak Renovation EP -11 -010 33,100 Exterior entryway doors EP -11 -007 90,500 Interior Entryway Doors EP -11 -008 67,900 Fill in grotto & tree rings NEW 125,000 Ramp to track NEW 41,000 Window washing NEW 26,300 Upgrade pool lank & deck tile NEW 189,500 Provide larger locker rooms NEW 582,000 Facility Maintenance NEW 110,400 POS System NEW 28,300 Hot water heater & holding tanks NEW 23,200 Scissors lift NEW 15,100 Facility Repair NEW - 145,000 Total $ 210,000 $ 364,000 $ 917,600 $ 172,300 $ 143,500 $ 186,700 $ 183,300 Edinborough Park's finances were combined with Centennial Lakes In one fund through 2011 and were separated into two funds starting in 2012. In order to show comparative historical data in this format, certain assumptions and estimates were made by the Finance Department for fiscal years 2009 -2011. 6/4/2012 GABudget12013 Budget \Edinborough study \Edinborough study.xlsx Edinborough Park Pool and Track /Fitness Option $1,500,000 Assumed 2012 -2018 Construction Fund Subsidy of $1,385,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 S v � L u $(500,000) $(1,000,000) � � d C CL 40% x $(1,500,000) 100% 90% 80% 70% Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 70% Projected 60% d Projected a 0 2009* 2010* 2011* 50% � � d C CL 40% x $(1,500,000) Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 2009* 2010* 2011* 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Expense recovery 71% 77% 85% 71% 80% 84% 82% 81% 79% Cash balance $1,350,112 $1,089,878 $993,003 $174,803 $117,003 $49,903 $(63,397) 30% 20% 10% 0% Projected 2018 70% $(345,597) Page 5 Change in net assets $ (113,282) EDINBOROUGH PARK 36,973 Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 Capital expenditures (512,510) (194,949) (179,628) Other accruals (117,470) 29,854 Playpark Option (168,809) 17,544 January 1 cash 2009' 2010' 2011' 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Pond and Waterfall Renovation Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Operating revenues Replace Carpeting EP -06 -007 Lift to Birthday Party Area EP -09 -014 Adventure Peak Remodel EP -09 -021 Adventure Peak Wave Slide Concessions sales $ 29,386 $ 29,328 $ 52,975 $ 175,000 $ 185,000 $ 190,000 $ 194,800 $ 199,700 $ 204,700 $ 209,800 Memberships 57,078 52,515 54,436 56,000 56,000 57,400 58,800 60,300 61,800 63,300 - Eliminate pool - - - - - (25,000) (25,600) (26,200) (26,900) (27,600) Admissions 563,735 569,591 654,971 550,000 550,000 563,800 577,900 592,300 607,100 622,300 -Rate increase - - - - 76,000 77,900 79,800 81,800 83;800 85,900 -More admissions - - - - - 98,000 100,500 103,000 105,600 108,200 - Eliminate pool - - - - - (21,000) (21,5p0) (22,000) (22,600) (23,200) Building rental 143,442 163,492 208,865 150,000 150,000 153,800 157,600 161,500 165,500 169,600 -Rate increase - - - - - 26,000 26,700 27,400 28,100 28,800 -More parties - - - - - 42,000 43,100 44,200 45,300 46,400 Equipment rental 7,814 11,397 15,261 8,500 8,500 12,000 12,300 12,600 12,900 13,200 Association fees 203,245 217,122 202,423 212,100 214,200 224,800 228,700 232,700 200,300 47,200 Total revenues 1,004,700 1,043,445 1,188,931 1,151,600 1,239,700 1,399,700 1,433,100 1,467,300 1,465,600 1,343,900 Operating expenses COGS 40,055 42,164 70,603 99,000 105,000 115,000 117,900 120,800 123,800 126,900 Personal services 666,921 677,701 637,146 783,210 797,479 821,400 846,000 871,400 897,500 924,400 - Staffing reduction - - - - (97,000) (99,400) (101,900) (104,400) (107,000) (109,700) Contractual services 386,027 316,198 308,998 331,500 335,000 343,400 352,000 360,800 369,800 379,000 - Staffing reduction - - - - 24,000 24,600 25,200 25,800 26,400 27,100 -Lighting efficiency (40,000) (41,000) (42,000) (43,100) (44,200) (45,300) - Eliminate pool - - - - - (20,000) (20,500) (21,000) (21,500) (22,000) Commodities 175,145 148,342 169,991 182,200 187,700 192,400 197,200 202,100 207,200 212,400 Central services 39,573 38,495 51,850 56,424 57,096 58,500 60,000 61,500 63,000 64,600 Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 162,700 173,600 229,200 283,300 294,000 304,100 312,100 Total expenses 1,406,471 1,351,894 1,398,787 1,615,034 1,542,875 1,624,100 1,717,200 1,767,900 1,819,100 1,869,500 Operating loss (401,771) (308,449) (209,856) (463,434) (303,175) (224,400) (284,100) (300,600) (353,500) (525,600) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest income 37,364 73,650 95,866 40,500 32,700 29,800 (16,900) (17,400) (18,100) (20,200) Miscellaneous 1,125 - - - - - - - - - Transfers 250,000 102,091 150,963 210,000 292,200 197,000 172,300 143,500 186,700 183,300 Total nonoperating 288,489 175,741 246,829 250,500 324,900 226,800 155,400 126,100 168,600 163,100 Change in net assets (113,282) (132,708) 36,973 (212,934) 21,725 2,400 (128,700) (174,500) (184,900) (362,500) January 1 net assets - 2,636,318 2,423,384 2,445,109 2,447,509 2,318,809 2,144,309 1,959,409 December 31 net assets $ 2,636,318 $ 2,423,384 $ 2,445,109 $ 2,447,509 $ 2,318,809 $ 2,144,309 $ 1,959,409 $ 1,596,909 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ (113,282) $ (132,708) $ 36,973 Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 Capital expenditures (512,510) (194,949) (179,628) Other accruals (117,470) 29,854 Change in cash (644,512) (168,809) 17,544 January 1 cash December 31 cash $ 1,350,112 Expense recovery 71% 77% 85% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Lighting retrofit EP -12 -001 Pond and Waterfall Renovation EP -12 -004 Concrete repairs EP -09 -016 Track Air Conditioning EP -11 -005 Upstairs Restroom Remodel EP -11 -009 Replace Carpeting EP -06 -007 Lift to Birthday Party Area EP -09 -014 Adventure Peak Remodel EP -09 -021 Adventure Peak Wave Slide EP- 11-006 Security Camera System EP -08 -007 Track Floor EP -09 -015 North Sidewalk EP -10 -011 Park Boiler EP -12 -003 Adventure Peak Renovation EP -11 -010 Exterior Entryway Doors EP -11 -007 Interior Entryway Doors EP -11 -008 Fill in grotto and tree rings NEW Ramp to track NEW Window washing NEW Infill pool /play structure /mtg rooms NEW Facility Maintenance NEW POS System NEW Hot water heater & holding tanks NEW Scissors lift NEW Facility Repair NEW Total $ (212,934) $ 21,725 $ 2,400 $ (128,700) $ (174,500) $ (184,900) $ (362,500) 162,700 173,600 229,200 283,300 294,000 304,100 312,100 (210,000) (292,200) (1,787,600) (172,300) (143,500) (186,700) (183,300) (260,234) (96,875) (1,556,000) (17,700) (24,000) (67,500) (233,700) 1,350,112 1,089,878 993,003 (562,997) (580,697) (604,697) (672,197) $ 1,089,878 $ 993,003 $ (562,997) $ (580,697) $ (604,697) $ (672,197) $ (905,897) 71% 80% 86% 83% 83% 81% 72% 65,000 20,000 153,800 66,600 30,800 12,600 42,000 26,300 26,300 43,100 70,000 32,300 26,900 33,100 90,500 67,900 125,000 41,000 26,300 1,654,100 110,400 28,300 23,200 15,100 145,000 $ 210,000 $ 292,200 $ 1,787,600 $ 172,300 $ 143,500 $ 186,700 $ 183,300 Edinborough Park's finances were combined with Centennial Lakes in one fund through 2011 and were separated into two funds starting in 2012. In order to show comparative historical data in this format, certain assumptions and estimates were made by the Finance Department for fiscal years 2009 -2011. 6/4/2012 G:\Budget\2013 Budget \Edinborough study \Edinborough study.xlsx Edinborough Park Playpark Option $1,500,000 Assumed 2012 -2018 Construction Fund Subsidy of $1,385,000 $1,000,000 ♦ 72% ♦ $500,000 v ♦ M M L ♦ M ♦ $(500,000) $(1,000,000) $(1,500,000) Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 2009* 2010* 2011* 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Expense recovery 71% 77% 85% 71% 80% 86% 83% 83% 81% 72% Cash balance $1,350,112 $1,089,878 $993,003 $(562,997) $(580,697) $(604,697) $(672,197) $(905,897) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% v 'o 50% C ii 40% W 30% 20% 10% 0% Page 7 Change in net assets $ (113,282) EDINBOROUGH PARK 36,973 Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 Capital expenditures (512,510) (194,949) (179,628) Other accruals (117,470) Playpark and Artwalk Option Change in cash (644,512) (168,809) 17,544 January 1 cash 2009' 2010' 2011• 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 EP -12 -001 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Operating revenues Upstairs Restroom Remodel EP -11 -009 Replace Carpeting EP -06 -007 Lift to Birthday Party Area EP -09 -014 Adventure Peak Remodel Concessions sales $ 29,386 $ 29,328 $ 52,975 $ 175,000 $ 185,000 $ 190,000 $ 194,800 $ 199,700 $ 204,700 $ 209,800 Memberships 57,078 52,515 54,436 56,000 56,000 57,400 58,800 60,300 61,800 63,300 - Eliminate pool - - - - - (25,000) (25,600) (26,200) (26,900) (27,600) Admissions 563,735 569,591 654,971 550,000 550,000 563,800 577,900 592,300 607,100 622,300 -Rate increase NEW Scissors lift - 76,000 77,900 79,800 81,800 83,800 85,900 -More admissions - - - - - 98,000 100,500 103,000 105,600 108,200 - Eliminate pool - - - - - (21,000) (21,500) (22,000) (22,600) (23,200) Building rental 143,442 163,492 208,865 150,000 150,000 153,800 157,600 161,500 165,500 169,600 -Rate increase - - - - - 26,000 26,700 27,400 28,100 28,800 -More parties - - - - - 42,000 43,100 44,200 45,300 46,400 Equipment rental 7,814 11,397 15,261 8,500 8,500 12,000 12,300 12,600 12,900 13,200 Association fees 203,245 217,122 202,423 212,100 214,200 224,800 228,700 232,700 200,300 47,200 Total revenues 1,004,700 1,043,445 1,188,931 1,151,600 1,239,700 1,399,700 1,433,100 1,467,300 1,465,600 1,343,900 Operating expenses COGS 40,055 42,164 70,603 99,000 105,000 115,000 117,900 120,800 123,800 126,900 Personal services 666,921 677,701 637,146 783,210 797,479 821,400 846,000 871,400 897,500 924,400 - Staffing reduction - - - - (97,000) (99,400) (101,900) (104,400) (107,000) (109,700) Contractual services 386,027 316,198 308,998 331,500 335,000 343,400 352,000 360,800 369,800 379,000 - Staffing reduction - - - - 24,000 24,600 25,200 25,800 26,4d0 27,100 - Lighting efficiency - - - - (40,000) (41,000) (42,000) (43,100) (44,200) (45,300) - Eliminate pool - (20,000) (20,500) (21,000) (21,500) (22,000) Commodities 175,145 148,342 169,991 182,200 187,700 192,400 197,200 202,100 207,200 212,400 Central services 39,573 38,495 51,850 56,424 57,096 58,500 60,000 61,500 63,000 64,600 Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 162,700 172,600 230,000 286,900 297,600 307,700 315,700 Total expenses 1,406,471 1,351,894 1,398,787 1,615,034 1,541,875 1,624,900 1,720,800 1,771,500 1,822,700 1,873,100 Operating loss (401,771) (308,449) (209,856) (463,434) (302,175) (225,200) (287,700) (304,200) (357,100) (529,200) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest income 37,364 73,650 95,866 40,500 32,700 29,800 (19,000) (19,500) (20,300) (22,400) Miscellaneous 1,125 - - - - - - - - Transfers 250,000 102,091 150,963 210,000 251,200 238,000 172,300 143,500 186,700 183,300 Total nonoperating 288,489 175,741 246,829 250,500 283,900 267,800 153,300 124,000 166,400 160,900 Change in net assets (113,282) (132,708) 36,973 (212,934) (18,275) 42,600 (134,400) (180,200) (190,700) (368,300) January 1 net assets - 2,636,318 2,423,384 2,405,109 2,447,709 2,313,309 2,133,109 1,942,409 December 31 net assets $ 2,636,318 $ 2,423,384 $ 2,405,109 $ 2,447,709 $ 2,313,309 $ 2,133,109 $ 1,942,409 $ 1,574,109 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ (113,282) $ (132,708) $ 36,973 Depreciation 98,750 128,994 160,199 Capital expenditures (512,510) (194,949) (179,628) Other accruals (117,470) 29,854 Change in cash (644,512) (168,809) 17,544 January 1 cash December 31 cash $ 1,350,112 Expense recovery 71% 77% 85% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Lighting retrofit EP -12 -001 Pond and Waterfall Renovation EP- 12-004 Concrete repairs EP -09 -016 Track Air Conditioning EP -11 -005 Upstairs Restroom Remodel EP -11 -009 Replace Carpeting EP -06 -007 Lift to Birthday Party Area EP -09 -014 Adventure Peak Remodel EP -09 -021 Adventure Peak Wave Slide EP -11 -006 Security Camera System EP -08 -007 Track Floor EP -09 -015 North Sidewalk EP -10 -011 Park Boiler EP -12 -003 Adventure Peak Renovation EP -11 -010 Exterior Entryway Doors EP.-11 -007 Interior Entryway Doors EP -11 -008 Fill in grotto and tree rings NEW Window washing NEW Infill poollplay structure /mtg rooms NEW Add 116 mile Artwalk NEW Facility Maintenance NEW POS System NEW Hot water heater 8 holding tanks NEW Scissors lift NEW Facility Repair NEW Total $ (212,934) $ (18,275) $ 42,600 $ (134,400) $ (180,200) $ (190,700) $ (368,300) 162,700 172,600 230,000 286,900 297,600 307,700 315,700 (210,000) (251,200) (1,897,400) (172,300) (143,500) (166,700) (183,300) (260,234) (96,875) (1,624,800) (19,800) (26,100) (69,700) (235,900) 1,350,112 1,089,878 993,003 (631,797) (651,597) (677,697) (747,397) $ 1,089,878 $ 993,003 $ (631,797) $ (651,597) $ (677,697) $ (747,397) $ (983,297) 71% 80% 86% 83% 83% 80% 72% 65,000 20,000 153,800 66,600 30,800 12,600 42,000 26,300 26,300 43,100 70,000 32,300 26,900 33,100 90,500 67,900 125,000 26,300 1,654,100 109,800 110,400 28,300 23,200 15,100 145,000 $ 210200 $ 251,200 $ 1,897,400 $ 172,300 $ 143,500 $ 186,700 $ 183,300 Edinborough Park's finances were combined with Centennial Lakes In one fund through 2011 and were separated into two funds starting in 2012. In order to show comparative historical data in this format, certain assumptions and estimates were made by the Finance Department for fiscal years 2009 -2011. - 6/4/2012 GABudget\2013 Budget\Edinborough study \Edinborough study.xlsx $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 v $- t m u $(500,000) $(1,000,000) Edinborough Park Playpark and Artwalk Option Assumed 2012 -2018 Construction Fund Subsidy of $1,385,000 100x% fib ` 90% ♦ 80% ♦ 72% ♦ 70% ♦ ♦ 60% ♦ u d 50% ♦ c a ♦ 40% W ♦ 30% ` 20% $(1,500,000) 10% 0% Projected 2017 Projected 2018 80% 72% $(747,397) $(983,297) Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Projected Projected Projected Projected 2009* 2010* 2011* 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Expense recovery 71% 77% 85% 71% 80% 86% 83% 83% Cash balance $1,350,112 $1,089,878 $993,003 $(631,797) $(651,597) $(677,697) 10% 0% Projected 2017 Projected 2018 80% 72% $(747,397) $(983,297) MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL June 12, 2012 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:04 pm l II. kOLLCALL . Answering roll call were Members Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Kathryn Peterson III... APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Dan Peterson made .a. motion, seconded by Member Cella, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke approving the consent agenda,as follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes —Regular Meeting of Tuesday, May 8, 2012 Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VLA. Edinboroughe Park Study Recommendations Ann Kattreh (Parks and Recreation Assistant Director), Eric Roggeman (Finance Assistant Director) and Susan Faus (Sr. Recreation Facility Manager of Edinborough Park) gave a presentation to the Park Board on the Edinborough• Park Study. Ms. Kattreh asked Brad Gray, a board member from the Edina Swim Club, to talk a little bit about the partnership that is being proposed. Brad Gray, 6005 Girard Ave:•So., indicated that he has been asked to re- emphasize their portion of the recommendation related to the additional fiends the Edina Swim Club (ESC) would generate. Mr. Gray explained that one of the big issues for the ESC is that they don't have a "home" pool; they rent space in a variety- of locations including the pools at South View and Valley View Middle Schools. He noted that they spend.the majority of their pool facility money in other communities outside of Edina simply because of the space and the time that is needed. He noted this opportunity to partner with Edinborough would allow them to have a "home" pool for their age 12 and under swimmers which is the largest portion of their club. It would give these swimmers a primary place to swim on.a regular basis to prepare fortheir competitions year around and would provide a consistent environment for them. He noted that, in addition, it also provides an outstanding opportunity, for the parents and siblings to have someplace to go during the lengthy practices. Mr. Gray pointed out that their community involvement would also increase the capability for the pool to be viable for other community activities because it,will be open and it will also give the ESC opportunities to partner with Parks and.Recreation to potentially develop additional programming that is currently not available. He pointed out that currently the ESC spends approximately $4,700 a year of their budget at Edinborough pool and to increase that to $53,000 a year is very significant. He explained 1 that the commitment they are making for their initial term is a very long term. He noted that it's binding for the first several years of the contract, which was shown in the financial projections, and they have every expectation to increase their potential over time. He noted that it also provides an opportunity as a swim club to have a higher profile within the City as well as provide a higher profile for others that come to the ESC which would also help them with their residency requirements for their club as well as attract the younger swimmers that are harder to reach that are at the park playing before they reach the age of joining the ESC. It's really a win/win for the City and the ESC. Member Gieseke indicated Ms. Kattreh had talked about the association dues sun setting and what they would lose over time in those revenues and asked if they could somehow replace some of the revenues by having season passes offered to the same residents because that would essentially replace it and therefore it would be equivalent. Ms. Kattreh replied it is certainly a possibility that they could replace some of those revenues but to think they could replace the majority of those revenues would not be correct at this point because they feel it would,be too difficult to estimate accurately how much they could generate from their neighbors for daily user fees or season passes. She commented that they have had discussions with their neighbors about potentially voluntarily extending their association fees and is something that as staff they are pursuing. Member Gieseke made a suggestion of maybe looking at an option of tying in the Aquatic Center season pass with Edinborough for an additional cost and people could maybe use the indoor pool for a few extra months. Member Kattreh replied that is a great idea and right now they have a great opportunity with Susan Faus being the manager of both the Aquatic Center and Edinborough Park to look at some partnering. Member Jones asked about the timing needs for the ESC and asked how it can remain open to the residents of Edina. Ms. Kattreh explained that it is their recommendation that they make all of these changes effective this year and that they would increase the pool time for the ESC starting in September. She noted the times they've been working with the ESC is from 3:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 7:00 am to 10:00 am on Saturdays. Therefore, the impact would be to the lap swimmers this fall and some open swim times but it is their opinion that these are not heavily used times and would be much better used by the ESC. Member Jones commented that the pool is kept fairly warm and wondered if they would continue to keep it warm. Ms. Kattreh responded they have had a lot of discussions about that and they will keep it the same; 83 degrees with the air temperature at 84 degrees, they are very sensitive to the Community Education and some of their classes that use the pool and the ESC is willing to work with them on the pool temperature. Member Jones indicated that she likes the concept of the walking track and asked why that is not part of Plan A. Ms. Kattreh replied the reason it is not included in Plan A is because part of the ESC proposal to them is that they use the track and fitness facilities as a dry land training facility for their athletes; which there is not a lot of space. She explained that if they do the art walk option they would essentially be eliminating the south side of the track from being used as a fitness opportunity and say the ESC wants to take 15 to 20 athletes up there at any time it's really going to tax the size of that space; however, it's certainly something they could discuss. Member Jones asked if the fitness facilities would be closed from 3:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Monday through Friday to which Ms. Kattreh replied no, it would remain open to the public and it would be a shared use with the ESC. Member Kathryn Peterson pointed out that when they talk about possible renewals or passes from the association and hotel as potential revenue it's important to note that finances would only come into play with Option A because if there isn't a pool then there is nothing there. Ms. Kattreh commented that Ms. Faus and she did meet with the Marriott Hotel, Edina Park Plaza and Corporate East and they had those exact discussions. She noted that one of their neighbors stated that they didn't really care about the pool; 2 it was the track that they were most concerned about. She noted one of the other neighbors mentioned that they really liked the option of having both but that the track was important to them as well. Therefore, she agrees the potential for renegotiating is much higher with the pool: Member Jones commented that Edinborough Park is a really pretty park and she wants to make sure they don't ruin the experience'as they try to cut costs. She noted she agrees there are several trees that are. overgrown and she is trying to sort through what the proposal is with the trees. She asked if where all of the current tall trees are will those areas be filled in or are there going to be midsized or tall plants put in. She commented that she is just trying to get a sense for how the place will feel once the proposals have been put in. Ms. Kattreh replied that essentially anywhere there are trees in the walkway they propose to remove them. In addition, where there are ficus trees that are growing up really tall in the entrances as well as the lower level that are growing up to the ceiling will be eliminated as well. She added there are some tall ficus trees that she thinks they could let grow and see how they do with the new lighting conditions. She indicated they also have a variety of plants that are in the 6'.to 8' range and it certainly would be their goal to try to have some taller plants; not necessarily tree size, because they need different lighting and maintenance requirements. Ms. Kattreh stated that they would propose to remove 38 of the large trees as well as thin out some of the lower plant beds to provide a more updated landscape look. She thinks they should be able to provide a very unique and beautiful environment just using a different type of vegetation. Ms. Kattreh commented another thing worth spelling out is the potential cost savings in terms of an energy retrofit; they would save $40,000 in just the lighting retrofit and another $80,000 in staffing costs. Member Jones asked once the grotto area is filled in what is the plan for potential uses for that space. Ms. Kattreh replied.first they could partner with the Edina Art Center and provide gallery space for their local artists. She noted they would potentially also have the ability to set up a birthday party space or maybe even an art class in the more wide open area. She added that they would also level off that space to make it, more handicapped accessible as well as provide a much larger space for people to mingle. Member Jones indicated that one of the prior scenarios they looked at was having catering and party rentals and asked why that is not a feature here. Ms. Kattreh responded it was eliminated because the two other proposals actually provide them a better cost recovery percentage. Member Dan Peterson asked regarding the user fees of the pool with a lot of letters and emails of people wanting to keep the pool why did the consultants say get rid of it, how did that happen? Ms. Kattreh replied the main answer for that is their partnership with the ESC because that was a discussion that just happened in the last month or two. She indicated that when the consultants looked at the fitness facilities they looked at their current facilities and what it would cost to bring their facilities up to a health club standard and they didn't feel the return on the investment was good enough. She added that without the commitment from the ESC she is not sure the pool option would be viable. Member Dan Peterson asked regarding the rollover fees and the law that was passed the legislature was not just to get at Edina; it was something else and that happened to affect us; is that correct? Ms. Kattreh replied that is correct, it happened back in the 1980s and it was challenged and the law was upheld. Member Dan Peterson asked Ms. Kattreh if all of this happens what is her best guess on cost recovery from renting, low to mid 70s or will it get up to 80% or 85%. Ms. Kattreh replied if they were to maintain their association fees at the level that they are to date yes, she thinks it would be safe to say that they would be in the low to mid 80s. Ms. Kattreh asked Mr. Roggeman if he would concur to which he replied yes. Ms. Kattreh noted they would hope that they would be able to motivate some of their association members to potentially voluntarily renew and that would put their percentage somewhere between the low 70s to the low 80s. Member Dan Peterson asked but the law would not restrict the City from renegotiating and have a new 15, 25 or 30 year fee contract to use the facilities, right. Ms. Kattreh replied that they cannot require it but if they voluntarily do it then that would be acceptable. She noted that they did have the City Attorney at the time these contracts were written give us his opinion and he stated that we would not be able to require the renewal of that 30 year commitment. Member Dan Peterson asked without the fee money of course the individual user fees go up dramatically. Ms. Kattreh replied that's correct, she thinks their user fees right now with the increase that they are proposing are about as high as they could make them. Arnie Bigbee, 7621 Edinborough Way, noted that Edinborough Park is a real gem in this community, it's a unique result of public /private partnership and he thinks it was ingenious of how in the past they put this together. He indicated that he agrees with Member Jones that it would be a real shame to have that lost as a community resource. He noted that in marketing a property like this it is important to find all of the values and purposes and he thinks the ESC looks like a tremendous value to our community. He noted another thing Edina has committed to do is be a "Do Town" City and he doesn't see a lot of Edina City employees at the fitness center when he is there and he doesn't know what kind of marketing efforts have been made to find out why employees don't use it. He indicated that he heard that there is an incentive for employees to be able to use that facility but they are not using it. It is the kind of facility, equipment, track and all of those things that would put this park into an investment mode, not an expense because the Human Resources we have for the City is probably one the largest resources that we fund every year. He commented that if you change those habits with employee health and wellness over the long term this is an opportunity for our community to be a leader again. They've got a facility that supports that and it would be a real shame from his perspective to see that changed into something else that wouldn't provide that opportunity for their population. Ryan Siemers, 7004 Lynmar Lane, indicated that he has lived at Edinborough Park off and on since 1986 when it was built. He noted that for Option C that includes the walking trail with the ESC asked if the hours that the ESC would require to use that track be inhibitive of the residents of Edinborough also using the track if not the pool. He stated there is a mixed population at Edinborough to which everyone would benefit from being able to use the pool during hours where kids do not have to be tucked into bed. He commented if they don't need to use the track during the entire peak time after hours or after work hours from 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. if that might also be an opportunity to have an hour or two everyday where that becomes a walking trail or an art walk. He stated there was a lot of talk about a number of revenue generating opportunities and he thinks you are kind of missing a few that might be worth exploring. The City should also look at opportunities for advertising from local businesses that target the family demographic and the folks that actually use the park such as rotating electronic signs that could be placed at the entrances or somewhat discreet print graphics that could be put on the glass wall between the pool and the kid area. He noted that they could also look at corporate sponsorships since this has been a public /private space that has been funded in the past and so why not continue that kind of opportunity in the future. He also wonders how many members of the ESC are projected for daily use on the track because we already know it's a confined space so how many people are going to feel comfortable in it together. He added that they do own a unit 7615 Edinborough Way, #4302. Evelyn Raedler, Bloomington resident, indicated that Edinborough Park is not just for Edina people; there are people that come from all of the other surrounding areas so it's important to a lot people not :just Edina. She noted that in all of the discussion it was just dollars, dollars and dollars and nothing was said about the health of the community particularly the older people who want to continue an active life. Edinborough and the pool are very, very important to them and that is why there are so many of them here tonight. She commented one clarification she would like to have is if the ESC were to use the pool in the evening what would happen to the evening water aerobics classes because there is an important constituency that has been going to the water aerobics classes for years and years and years and asked would that be cut out. She commented if you are serious about keeping the pool and partnering with Blue Cross Blue Shield in the "Do Town" program then one of the best ways to get people to groove your body every day is to mach out to a population that wants to live, work and play healthier. She added that a very important segment of that population lives within easy driving distance of 4 Edinborough and perhaps don't even know about it so if this plans go through, market, market, market and you will get a lot of people to use that facility which will help pay, for it. Greg Solum, 3300 Edinborough #550, indicated he has a law office in the Edinborough Corporate, Center East and he uses the pool for approximately three miles a week. He would like to echo what has. previously been said about the health aspects of this;because he thinks one of our main things about parks is focusing on health and wellness. He stated that he realizes it's about dollars and you have to watch that but on the other hand there is the obesity crisis among the children and a lack of fitness facilities available to seniors. He,stated the accessibility from the condos at Edinborough to the facilities may not make a lot of money but it's certainly a long =term asset and long -.term health benefit for all ages. He commented that he agrees about the marketing and thinks it's an important part of this and thinks that may be part of why the pool maybe underused and would strongly recommend.Option A. Barbara LaValleur, 7621 Edinborough Way #2110, indicated she has lived there for over eight years and wants to make it very clear =that she is for keeping the pool,,the walk around and expanding it in'anyway that they can to have more exercise equipment. She noted she has used the facility f'o'r eight years and it's a critical part of keeping.her fit in her 66`h year. She noted that' she is also membe.r,of the Edina Art Board and the Edina Public Art comm. ittee so she is veiVpleased to hear the commitment to public art and'thinks that -would add a great deal'to the appeal of the space. She commented that although;,she hates. to see the trees go she understands the practicality of that and would be in favor of that. She indicated one;question she has is if the pool is being used by the ESC would they be using the whole pool so there would not be any lanes open for the public at that time. Bill Bryan, 5908 Drew Ave., noted someone commented about City employees and noted that he is a part-time City employee and he has used the whole facility off and on since it was built for rehab. He stated that the track, fitness equipment, pool, the whole works is a gem that the world needs to know more about and know it's out there. He added that he is thankful every day for that facility. Patrick Shannon, 7622 York Ave. So., #1107, indicated that he thinks the Board would be receptive to renewing this because it is such an asset for the residents who live there. He noted when they bought their condo ten years ago and that was a real selling point that they could walk from his condo right to the park with this grandchildren. It's a beautiful park and if they have to increase the fees or something he thinks it's well worth it. He has been paying $15.00 a month for ten years and he thinks that is a steal and also thinks the employees are great. Member Cella stated that she thinks it's important going forward that they put the highest priority.i possible on renegotiating or working with the entities that pay these monthly fees to keep those ongoing and to work out some mutually agreeable way to keep that going. It sounds like it's, important for both the residents but certainly for the City's bottom line as well so she thinks it's a win /win situation. VLB. User Fee Policy Working Group Reconiniendalions . Chair Steel read the mission of the User Fees Working Group "The Working Group will evaluate current fee scales and costs associated with facility use, .while also developing policy that may be currently lacking for potential user groups ". She informed the Park Board that in reality they had to limit the scope of their recommendations because of the'magnitude of the issue that they were dealing with`: They focused on youth athletic associations because that was the main user group that City Council discussed. Chair Steel showed the Park Board some graphs and explained that_currently user fees are assessed to all youth athletic associations that use outdoor athletic facilities or gymnasiums. She noted she included in the Park Board packet an appendix which outlines which associations pay the use fee and what kind of revenue they are looking at. She indicated that in 2012 they increased the per participant user fee to $11.00 which went up from $9.00 in 2011. She pointed out on a chart the increases over the years and found it interesting that it has barely kept up with the rate of inflation. 5 Chair Steel explained that as they were trying to evaluate what the cost is associated with the use of the facilities by the youth athletic associations they found it was much more difficult to determine than they thought. She pointed out that the City does not determine variable costs by athletic associations and so the two things they looked at were field maintenance and rink maintenance. She commented that it's also important to know that field maintenance includes adult athletics and some other boulevard treatments so it is a much bigger pot of money than you would think and pointed out that it is rising at a much faster rate than the user fees. She noted that it's really important to emphasize that it's hard to determine what percentage of that maintenance cost is just related to youth athletics. Chair Steel indicated they really hone in on that point because they were asked to compare it to other municipalities. She noted that in the November issue of the "National Recreation Park Magazine" the data that they received in the "Pay to Play" is where they came up with numbers for the 256� percentile median and 75`h percentile as well as they also received numbers from the City of Eden Prairie for 2010. She pointed out that the chart actually doesn't mean a whole lot because what they are paying for youth athletics cotild be entirely different from the materials that another city is paying for so it would be like comparing apples to oranges. John Connolly, 7309 West Shore Drive, a member of the User Fee Working Group went over their recommendations based on the per park participant fee. He noted that the group came to a consensus about three things. First, they do support the practice of this and think it's a good philosophical thing as well as the resources that would supplement the scholarship of athletes, handicapped users, etc. Secondly, they determined it would be very helpful in determining the costs for variance of the maintenance costs related to the upkeep of facilities, capital improvements as well as the in -kind donations that a lot of the associations do such as scoreboards, park improvements, etc., so those sorts of things should be taken into consideration with each association. Finally, they recommend the per participant fee increases take effect the following fiscal year so that the fee cannot be raised two consecutive years in row. He explained the reason for that is some of the non - profits are on fiscal years and do not match well with the City of Edina's budget and therefore this gives them time to prepare and allocate based upon their own budget and fiscal year. Suzanne Kerwin, 5238 Hollywood Road, a member of the User Fee Working Group, talked about their second recommendation that the existing priority use policy document also requires that the athletic associations submit a financial supporting form that's developed by City staff. She explained that currently when the athletic associations submit their financial reporting there is a great variation. Some of the associations will submit a copy of their tax return, others will submit a copy of their bank statement and some have a whole profit and loss which is very detailed so there is a great variety to look through all of these and try to gleam what is important for the City to know. They do recommend that the City staff develop a Financial reporting form to make it more simplified. She indicated that they also recommend that the associations should report the percent of Edina residents participating in their association, currently there is no formal residency reporting method that exists. Bob McGarry, 6304 St. Johns Ave., a member of the User Fee Working Group, talked about their recommendation regarding the youth athletic associations that use the enterprise facilities, specifically the Edina Aquatic Center and Braemar Arena. He pointed out that recently a priority use document was created for the Aquatic Center. He noted they are recommending that a third priority use document be created that speaks to the arrangement at Braemar Arena and recognizes the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club as a priority use association and also includes the Edina Hockey Association. He indicated that athletic associations that exclusively use enterprise facilities are exempt from the per participant user fee and residency requirements because they pay competitive hourly fees to use these facilities. He added that the Parks and Recreation staff did review their recommendations and the residency requirement was an area they felt did not need to be in these recommendations to which the working group is open to taking that out. 0 Bob Kojetin, 5016 William Avenue, a member of the User Fee Working Group, talked about the mandated guidelines the Edina Swim Club must follow with regards to the "Priority Use of the Edina Aquatic Center ". He indicated that the Edina Swim Club and the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club are two associations that are basically individual participation sports versus team sports. He explained that.these associations pay rent for the facility they use. He noted that the User Fee Working Group agrees with the 90% residency requirement for team sport associations and they understand that the Edina Swim Club residency requirement should be only 75% because a lot of individuals who participate in swimming come from a lot of different areas. He pointed out the swim clubs throughout the metropolitan area consist of a lot of different facilities in a lot of different communities.. He explained that with the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club it's a little bit different because they skate in maybe two or three different areas and so it's very difficult to control. He commented that if a good coach is in another community that family will follow that coach and travel to that particular community so it's very difficult for them to have 75 %, 60% or 90 %. He indicated that the'Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club and the Edina Hockey Association pay a surcharge fee at Braemar Arena. Mr. Kojetin noted that regarding the Tournament Policy, it really goes back to how much does it cost the City to have full -time and part-time staff prepare fields for activities during the weekends when tournaments are generally'held. He indicated that if a tournament is a fundraiser for an athletic association then they are expected to pay for operating expenses incurred by the City. He stated that it's never been1'a written policy but the User Fee Working Group is proposing that those costs should always be documented as a matter of practice. They need to find' out what to charge for the use of Van Valkenburg Park or Courtney Fields. We need to know what it is going to cost the City to run that facility for the weekend for the association's fundraiser tournament. Chair Steel informed the Park Board there were a few issues that they discussed at their last meeting in trying to develop this policy. The first issue is the relationship document makes an exception to team eligibility for the Edina Swim Club but it doesn't have this exception for other associations that make decisions based on the participant's ability. The second issue is there is one athletic association per sport; however, this isn't true for the Edina Girls Athletic Association which has the same sports and so just to move forward and have compliance the City Council may want to look at these issues. Mr. Keprios pointed out he thinks the way the relationship document is written is it encourages one association per sport but there are some minor exceptions as it was pointed out. He noted that the City Council recently approved a new priority access document for the Edina Aquatic Center and also changed the original Relationship Document created by the Youth Sports Task Force. The new document makes one exception for the Edina Swim Club to abide by a75% residency requirement. He noted that it mentions in the User Fees Working Group recommendations not included in the exception are the Edina Volleyball Association and the Edina Soccer Club and asked is there a reason that was called out, do they. not meet the 90% residency. Chair Steel responded that it's not about residency, it's about team performance. Mr. McGarry explained they were just pointing out some verbiage that is written in the relationship document that talks about sports being open to all participants; however, he believes the situation with the Edina Swim Club, Edina Soccer Club and the Edina Volleyball Association is that they have tryouts and therefore do not take everyone who wants to participate. Fie noted they were just pointing out a discrepancy in a statement that was made in regards to having a program that is open for everyone. 'Mr. Keprios responded they make an exception for the Edina Swim Club in that area because the participant needs to be a competent enough swimmer before they can be a member of the Edina Swim Club. He stated that as far as the Edina Soccer Club it's not just open to anyone of any talent and is considered the traveling component of soccer in Edina which is why there are two separate associations. Mr. Keprios asked with regards to staff monitoring and reporting tournament costs he assumes they would like that information gathered as best they can when it comes time to approve the fees and charges to which Chair Steel replied yes. Mr. Keprios noted that fee is separate from the per individual VA user fee because when they do have a fundraiser tournament they pay a per field per day fee. Chair Steel replied in talking about a tournament policy they are looking at more than just a fee that they pay but want to know what is the staff time and everything else that goes into it. Mr. Keprios explained that as staff they take all of that into account when they propose the fees. He noted that if Park Board wants to get into that level of detail, there are a lot of variables that come into play and therefore some of it is their best guess because they don't budget it that way. He stated they can tell you pretty much what the staff costs were for a particular tournament and it's going to vary from one sport to the next, from one tournament to the next and costs will also vary depending on the weather. He commented that they would be happy to try if you feel you need that level of information although it's going to be a little more documentation and time for staff. Chair Steel responded that she doesn't think it was necessarily the feeling.of the working group that they need that level of detail but rather felt that the City Council wanted that variable cost so she would just turn it to them and let them decide the level of detail they want. Mr. Keprios pointed out that as they go down the road he thinks it's important for the Park Board to remember that a lot of these facilities are used by more than just the youth athletic associations so he thinks it becomes debatable and an important issue of how much of the cost of that burden should be on the shoulders of just the youth athletic associations. He noted that it's a bit of a departure from past practice of the fees and charges policy, for example, how much of the financial burden should fall on the shoulders of the general public who benefit for having outdoor rinks or the times when there is no scheduled play and it's open to the general public. Mr. Keprios asked if the working group gave some thought to or are suggesting that maybe it should vary per sport as the sports differ in what it costs to provide. Chair Steel replied that they did not even weigh that decision because they don't have the data to support that. She stated that they support the current practice because it's the best thing that works with the data they have. Mr. Connolly commented there was debate internally about this amongst them and in particular there was one sport that used to use a school district facility that now uses park land and they were questioning the per participant fee. He noted it's so difficult sometimes to not make it at least a blanket policy and it was their feeling that it was better to do it as a blanket policy. He noted that in this circumstance it was consistent and for your staff to monitor that it was just a clear communication tool and yes, he thinks the conclusion was they wanted it to be consistent and felt that it was the right way to go. Mr. Kojetin indicated they had a meeting with all of the presidents of the associations and they all seemed to agree with the same amount of money that each one of the participants would pay for each association. They felt that $11.00 wasn't that big of a burden because they will charge it right back to the participant when they register. He noted that if it went up to $20 or $25 then they would be concerned and would want to know where the money is going. Member Cella asked the working group if they considered charging the actual hours of the gyms and fields the associations were using because there may be one group using a facility one hour a week who are then subsidizing the group that is using it 25 hours a week. She noted it's very easy to count up hours of use versus just a head count and if they actually charged per hour of use of a field or a gym and made them pay based on that basis rather than just a per head it might increase fees. Chair Steel replied they didn't receive data on that so they didn't look at hours but she thinks when they were talking about variable costs different facilities and different fields actually have different costs so that hourly rate would have to be variable. For example, a gym is going to be much cheaper because a soccer field is always much more expensive to maintain. She commented that when they talked with the athletic associations she thinks the general sentiment is this is for the kids and do we really want to be picking the winners and losers of certain sports because kids are choosing soccer over volleyball so it's a tricky decision. Member Cella commented that it's a little more complicated if they are looking at hours but it would seem to maybe be a fairer way to do it and it may generate more revenue, she doesn't know you would have to do the numbers and figure out what your price point was for your hourly use but it's something to think about. Mr. Keprios commented that's an excellent point because when users pay for either a field or a gym it creates an equalizer so that it becomes more fair and equitable. He explained that the per participant fee Was originally viewed to be a one -time per year per sport season fee to give the association's priority access to the facility. He noted that it was never intended to cover all of the costs of maintenance and added that it certainly gets skewed such as when Member Cella pointed out that there is such a variety of use. He indicated that this is the first year the school district is now charging for everything that they never charged for before. He noted that maybe that's the direction we should be heading with the City fields, we should charge the priority access fee as they should start calling it and give some thought to the per hour usage of fields. Mr. Kojetin asked Mr. Keprios if the City is charging the school district for using City facilities and does the City get charged for using school district facilities. Mr. Keprios replied the only thing`the City charges the school district for is indoor ice time at Braemar Arena. He noted that they have done computations an d it ends up being approximately a $30,000 gift that the City is giving the school district each year. He noted it's something they haven't charged; it's just been the:philosophy of supporting .school sports; however, if that philosophy changes then it very well may change. Member Jones asked the working group if they talked about their philosophy of what the fees should be covering and were they thinking they should be covering total costs of the use of the fields. Ms. Kerwin replied it was discussed but they did not come to any consensus on that issue. She noted the per participant fee generates a lot of money for the City to keep the park facilities used by the athletic associations going and they agree it's a good thing. She stated that they weren't able to get at the specific costs per sport and they didn't get the hours but that is an interesting way to look at it. Ms. Kerwin pointed out that in their discussions with the athletic associations presidents they seemed very comfortable with the current system because it is easy and that is probably why it started out that way. She noted that she could see a whole can of worms opening up to change it; therefore, they didn't ,want to recommend any changes without having the hard data which isn't there in the budget right now. She indicated that one thing they did hear was while the youth athletic association fees don't cover the total costs of what the associations are getting using the facilities and the upkeep and maintenance of those there are a lot of volunteer hours that go into these organizations and they don't have a hard dollar figure for all of the volunteer hours that are able to provide these services to the community. Member Jones indicated that a lot of the recommendations are for trying to gather data but she doesn't want staff to gather data if they. don't have a philosophy of what it is they are going to do with that data. She noted once they know how much these might cost would you recommend that the associations ought to be paying their total cost or a certain percentage because they are going to be setting policy. Chair Steel responded that she thinks the reason you want this specific data is.because of the interest of the City Council, they wanted them to look at the variable costs so they are saying well you can't look at the variable costs until you have the data on it and if you want the data on it you have to go collect it. She commented that she doesn't know what the feeling of the Park Board is on variable costs but feels they were kind of driven by the City Council and since we are advisory they expressed interest in that. Member Jones asked the working group if they looked into the League of Women Voters study on private use of public facilities to which Ms. Kerwin replied yes. Member Jones asked was the working group comfortable with the study or is there a reason why this wasn't part of the Park Board's background material. Chair Steel replied that she thinks the League Study is much more comprehensive than the scope of their working group and they had a lot of trouble just getting the data they wanted because of the way the City reports information. 0 Mr. Connolly pointed out that you get into a lot of variables with the usage especially in fields because baseball takes up a little more dressing than a soccer field and there are other sports that use the facility that don't beat a field up as much as other sports so there is just no way to determine how much it takes. Member Jones indicated that she appreciates Member Cella's comment about the per hour and noted that is what they are currently doing with the Edina Aquatic Center and Braemar Arena. She noted another thing she would like to see as part of the recommendation going to the City Council would be that they need to try to figure out these figures and one of the reasons for that is because she thinks there is a perception that what they are paying covers the full cost of maintenance and sometimes the youth athletic associations feel as if they are being charged more than other people because they are registering for a sport and not just paying taxes. She commented that she would be looking for something in writing, if they are going to continue with the user fee, when they register that states so much is going to the City to cover a certain percentage of the sport and this way it would be very clear that it may not be 100 %. She noted that she thinks from the League of Women Voters study it looks like it might be 25% of the cost of the sport to the City. She stated she thinks this would then give the people a feeling for where they stand and it would be a little more transparent so that is why she would actually collect the data. Chair Steel replied she thinks that is a great point but it may be a little difficult to individually say this is your percentage; however, when they look at fees and charges they have an opportunity to inform the public of what this cost is covering. Therefore, if they can collect this data they can be clearer. Chair Steel stated she really enjoyed meeting with the association representatives and thinks there should be more dialog and build on those relationships because they are volunteers. She noted there is a lot to learn and the working group had to wrap their heads around this model and the nuances and so she thinks they can do a better job of educating the associations and other residents. Member Kathryn Peterson commented under 1C it says "fees may not be raised two consecutive years in a row" and asked if that was based on specific feedback from the associations. She stated that she has been on athletic association boards and she thinks if it's a $1.00 or $2.00 increase that two years in a row isn't a big deal but if you were talking about $10.00 or $20.00 that would be huge; however, if it's a nominal increase it's hard for her to imagine that doing that two years in a row would be a hardship. Mr. Connolly responded that it's not a hardship but from a budgeting standpoint a lot of these associations register their athletes months in advance so when they budget it lines up with their fiscal year and at least they can estimate and make a better decision businesswise based upon if they know what that fee is going to be and that was their consensus going forward. Member Kathryn Peterson suggested including tournament information in the financial reporting, the revenues and expenses of tournaments. She pointed out regarding the 90% residency, what she found challenging when she was on the Edina Baseball Board is not because baseball selects kids from outside of Edina but they do have a policy of allowing kids to play both who are residents of Edina and who go to school in Edina which includes OLG, Calvin Christian as well as kids who go to Edina High School through open enrollment. She noted that open enrollment has kind of created a little bit of a challenge around that and where you would think it would be really a slam dunk to get that 90% baseball probably runs around 92% to 93% it's lower than what you would think because of open enrollment. Mr. Keprios responded that he thinks the intent was that for those who are enrolled in Edina schools that are non- residents through open enrollment would qualify as a resident when they are doing the tabulation. It's just those that don't go to a school in Edina and don't live in Edina that would qualify as a non - resident. Member Cella commented that as she understands the 90% residency requirement is that it is to give you a priority use of fields and facilities and now the Edina Swim Club has a 75% residency requirement because they are getting priority use of the pool space so the only one that doesn't have a residency requirement is the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club. She asked if they get priority usage of ice time. Mr. Keprios replied currently there is no access to the Braemar Arena facility policy in place. He explained what they are recommending is that you not have a residency requirement for that group but that would be contrary to what the City Council recently passed for the Edina Aquatic Center. He 10 noted the Figure. Skating Club is significantly different than the Edina Swim Club because, less than 30% are residents. Member Cella asked but they still get a priority usage of ice time because it seems to her that the residency is so that you are standing in a better place in line to get time and space; however, if they are not in a better place in line then she can understand why there would be no requirement. She noted that they would have to think about why only one club doesn't have to fol low! the rules of everybody else if, in fact, they are getting a better place in line but if they *are not then there is no reason for it. Mr. Keprios responded there really hasn't been a need to establish,a policy out there they have just been following what is the best business practice to sell all of the ice and they've been a wonderful customer for many, many years and they've evolved to a lesser and lesser percentage of residents. He commented that when they operate it like a business it's a fine'line between what is good public policy and what's best business practice. Chair Steel noted that 3B of the working group's recommendation states "We recommend that associations that exclusively use en .terprise facilities are exempt•.from the per participant user fee and residency.requirements, because they pay competitive hourly fees to use these, facilities She stated the Edina Swim Club does not pay a per participant user fee so it is their, feeling to make this across the board for enterprise facilities that is your qualifier and then they don't.have residency requirements. The reason she believes they wanted ;to create a Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club document that cited them as a priority user is because there is a history there, there is an established relationship and other associations spoke well of them so she thinks they are trying to find somewhere in between to work with the different characteristics of each association. Member Jones indicated she thinks the City Council just passed. something on the Hornet's Nest where they would be charged an additional user fee and asked how the working group's recommendation fits in with that. Chair Steel replied it doesn't, they were trying to create a recommendation as City Council was making their own so it does not. Member Jones asked if the working group is continuing to recommend that. Chair Steel replied yes and if the Park Board takes issue with one of the specific recommendations they can change that, otherwise City Council can address it with the understanding that things have changed. Member Jones replied regarding enterprise facilities it would be nice to have the flexibility to insert a user fee if they.need'to make capital improvements as they are doing with the Hornet's Nest so she would recommend they take that out of "3B ". Chair.Steel responded there is no reason you can't assess a user fee, it's just you can't assess the per participant user fee, so that shouldn't affect it." Member Jones stated for example for the Hornet's Nest they were recommending not an increase in the user fee, that's what you are referring, we recommended a per participant user fee. Member Cella stated she believes Member Jones is correct that in the documents it states both the Hockey Association and the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club both had to pay $20.00, a head fee for a number of years as part of the contributing to the capital renovations for Braemar .Arena. Chair Steel replied she would just be a stickler and not say that $22.00 per head is a per participant user fee because when the Park Board approves the per participant fee- it,'s the same dollar amount for every association and so that is how she would deal with "that. Member. Kathryn Peterson noted that`she thinks it's more like a capital improvement surcharge and that she agrees with�Chair Steel; it's similar but different than what is in here because. it's not applied across the board. Mr. Keprios pointed out that you are kind of mixing your tasks. The $15.00 per participant surcharge fee that was charged the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club and the Edina Hockey, Association was used to convert the Braemar,Pavi lion into what is now the East Arena. There were several capital improvements needed so the two groups agreed to pay $15.00 per player surcharge for the life of the bonds. When those bonds got paid off, before they recently renovated the West Arena, the $1 5.00 surcharge fee ended when the bonds were paid off. Mr. Keprios noted that now with the advent of the Hornet's Nest they are taking the same approach in that they need some help paying for these bonds. The Park Board agreed that would be an appropriate revenue source that will end when those bonds are paid off so therefore it is not an access fee that you've really set off to study. 11 Mr. Keprios commented that the fees and charges discussion is an important one and it'§ one that you can easily get off on tangents and quickly become overwhelming. Therefore, he would recommend you focus on just the one fee that you have chosen to study and carry this on to the next meeting. Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to table those recommendations until the next meeting and they can discuss it then. Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried VI. C. Sports Dome Working Group Phase II Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Member Jones has informed him that he has misnamed the group and by their new bylaw rules that were approved by the City Council they are actually a "Committee" so they need to be sure to change the name. He stated that he knows Member Deeds is willing to serve on the reconvening of this committee and that all members of the Sports Dome Committee are Park Board members along with Ms. Kattreh. He informed the Park Board that they have learned that the proposed site south of the South Metro Training Facility is not financially feasible, there is room but it's going to be close to a two million dollar proposition just for site development. He noted they believe there is a much more affordable option out there and the City Council would like the committee to reconvene and review a couple of sites that staff would like to propose. Mr. Keprios asked for a list of the names of the Park Board members on the committee to which it was noted: Members Deeds, Jones, Jacobson, Gieseke, Hulbert and Ann Kattreh. Member Dan Peterson made a motion, seconded by Chair Steel, approval of the Sports Dome Committee as named. Ayes: Members Dan Peterson, Jacobson, Gieseke, Steel, Cella, Jones, Kathryn Peterson Motion Carried VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that handed out tonight is hard copies of the up -to -date emails including something from Skip Reebie that was dropped off at City Hall with regards to Edinborough Park. There is also some information from "First Athlete" on their training facility that they wanted the Park Board to have. VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEivIBER COMMENTS Chair Steel gave the Park Board an update on the self - assessment, she completed compiling it and printing it although left it at home so she will email to Mr. Keprios to forward on to the Park Board. She noted that she is going to work with Mr. Keprios and Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager, to put some sort of a retreat together to address some of the different things that came up in the self - assessment. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board as he mentioned earlier that City Council has already voted to approve that the Golf Dome be rebuilt in its exact same location. He noted he was asked about the effect of the loss of the Golf Dome enterprise revenues and stated that the Golf Dome loss of business was covered by insurance because they have business interruption insurance. He noted they are still not sure what that is going to be but he thinks in the end they may do even better than they did last year. He noted that another good reason to put the dome back in its current location is because we have excellent coverage and if they were to move it they would have to pay for new footings and any site restorations that would need to be done. He commented that under the current policy the insurance company will pay for pretty much the entire replacement if it stays on site including paying for additional new building code required expenses that kick into place that may not have been there when it was first built so it's all good news. 12 Mr.- Keprios informed the Park Board that the Hornet's Nest is on an extremely fast track. The proposal and the attorneys have worked it out between the "Drive for the Hive ",.and our City attorney. He noted that it's going to be a little bit of a design build kind of approach'but they still are going through the public bidding'process. Their goal is to have a public hearing at the City Council meeting on July 17`h to approve the Memorandum of Understanding to approve the project and to approve bids. They hope to have everything in place and all of their money raised so they can go forward with the whole proposal shortly after that date. It is their hope to have this built and operational by Thanksgiving so things are moving along very fast. He pointed out that if they don't meet the obligation of fundraising it will probably be delayed. Meeting adjourned at 9:28 pm. 13 ow e Cn • I�CORPORA�F'9� �ese REPORURECOM MEN ®AT'ION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. A. DEBRA MANGEN ❑ Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion Information Date: JULY 17, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. . r Susan Howl Dear Mayor James Hovland, My name is Ivy Cada and I work for The Daily. Energy Report. I'm contacting you because our publication is interested in having you write an editorial about Edina's energy challenges and accomplishments. Some potential questions that you coyld- answer include: - What is Edina's Energy and Su stainability strategy? - How much energy does the city /community spend on energy costs each year? - What political tools can you take advantage of that will help you make your city more sustainable /energy efficient? - What can businesses do to help the city achieve success? I'm happy to coordinate,a brief phone call with Ben Lack, CEO /Chief Conversationalist if you have any questions about what we are looking for. Thank,.you for the consideration and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Best Regards, Ivy Coda - The ,bai ly Energy Report 1'0110 US,! @dailyenerg ny ews iv adagdailyenergyreport.com www.ddilyenergyreport.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 8:38 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: email for Mayor and Council Members regarding Edina financials Lynette Biunno, Receptionist .; 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov - = ` ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Keith Kostuch jmailto:kkostuchCa)gmail.com1 Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 12:56 PM To: Edina Mail; Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: email for Mayor and Council Members regarding Edina financials ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: Keith Kostuch <kkostuch rnail.com> Date: Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:26 PM Subject: email for Mayor and Council Members regarding Edina financials To: edinaQedinamn.gov Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members, Thank you for the publication of the 2011 Edina Management report. It is a very helpful introduction to the City's financials and my quick read of the report provoked this email. I particularly want to congratulate all of you for your prudent financial management of General Fund spending during recent years when many residents and businesses have struggled due to the difficult economy. Your discipline in keeping spending flat is admirable. That said, the state of several of the city enterprise operations are very concerning. While the operating profits or losses of various city enterprises are not explicitly provided in the report, I assume that subtracting operating costs from operating revenues is a close proxy with the following results: Utilities - $3,850,174 operating surplus Liquor - $1,445,378 operating surplus Aquatic - $209,834 operating surplus Golf - ($113,813) operating deficit Arena - ($457,299) operating deficit Art - ($163,829) operating deficit Edinborough - ($419, 495) operating deficit Total for operations in deficit - ($1,154,436) or —$24 /resident As a citizen, taxpayer and former businessman/consultant it seems to me that losses of this magnitude for non- essential services should be unacceptable. I definitely believe that the losses could be greatly reduced with 1 some basic management instead of being subsidized with transfers from the profitable enterprises. While these money losing enterprises do enhance the quality of life for a minority of Edina residents (and undoubtably many non - residents who make use of our taxpayer subsidized enterprises), I expect that most citizens would be surprised by the magnitude of the losses. The fact that losses are growing at some of these enterprises should be a concern (or a scandal) to every taxpayer in Edina. I heard there are "interest groups" that may have captured the boards of their respective enterprises and promote their own agendas at the expense of the ordinary residents. Ordinary residents who don't use those enterprises, don't follow Edina city government closely and who don't see that almost all the profits of the liquor stores and aquatic center are consumed by the losses at the golf, hockey, arts and Edinborough enterprises. I recall from a Sun - Current article that Edina taxes were raised by about $400,000 this year (that is from memory and may be wrong). Reducing the operating losses at the enterprises could have covered that increase and allowed Edina to boast to its current and prospective residents and businesses that it did not need to raise taxes. Given you represent all citizens, I would ask you to push back on'what economists would call "rent seekers" and force them to come up with plans that either dramatically reduce losses at "their" enterprises or find a way for them to take over the operations via some sort of non - profit organization. The city might even come out ahead if it gave the assets to such a group for $1. This is particularly true if Edina must put new money into capital improvements. That is clearly "good money after bad." It is my experience that most golfers, hockey players and arts lovers spend a lot of money on their hobby and are probably able better able to handle a cost increase than below average income residents or fixed income seniors suffering from low interest rates on their investments. If you didn't see the article on privatization in today's Wall Street Journal, it may be relevant to your deliberations on this topic. hqp•/ /online wsj com/ article/ SB10001424052702304141204577508482349727396 .html ?mod =WSJ Opinion L EFTTopOpinion Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Keith Kostuch kko stuchna, gmail . co m K_eitli Kostucli 41 II Lakcvi.e.% Drive Keith Kostuch kkostuch( gmail.com Susan Howl From: Marc Grossman Lmai Ito: marc.grossman75 @gmail.coml Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 7:57 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshspragueCabedinarealty.com; swensonannl(a)gmail.com; Wayne Houle; Scott Neal Subject: Richmond Hills Project - Sewer Upgrade Overpayment Hello, I am a resident at 5008 Windsor Ave in the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood that is undergoing the 2012 roadway improvement project. On January 31, 2012, 1 received a letter from the city (attached) informing residents of the options for upgrading the sanitary sewer service pipe between the street and right -of -way. The amount estimated was $3,400. After seeking 3 bids, I hired a private contractor along with neighbors to have the work completed for $2,500 on March 20, 2012. On April 14, 2012, 1 learned through word of mouth and confirmed with SEH that the new amount for this work from the city contractor is $1,400. As a result, I over paid for this work by $1,100. My understanding is that the city contractor for 2012 roadway projects significantly underbid this portion of work since they were not awarded this work in other neighborhoods in the past. In my opinion, it does not appear to be a fair bidding practice for the total project contractors to underbid a portion of work against private contractors, since they have the advantage of making up for this loss elsewhere in the project. As a lifelong resident of Edina (36 years), I rely on the expertise of the city staff to look out for residents that will only participate in 1 -2 of these projects in their lifetime. If there was a chance for variability of this magnitude, I would have expected some further guidance and caution in the letter from the city. Why should residents have this portion of work completed by private contractors if this bidding risk exists? I would have been better off doing nothing and having the city contractor complete the work. I have heard from city staff that this may be a rare case and has not happened before with these roadway projects. As a result, I am asking that this issue be addressed at the appropriate time during project reviews and /or final assessment. I am seeking re- payment of $1,100 for myself and residents affected by this issue. I appreciate your concern and attention to reviewing this matter. Sincerely, Marc Grossman 5008 Windsor Ave 612 - 812 -4950 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 8:44 AM To: Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: My Concerns About Slavery Good morning, This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927- 8861'i Fax, 952= 826 -0389 i Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov f ...For hiving, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Slavery Footprint Lmai Ito: no- replyCabslaveryfootprint.orgl Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 8:13 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: My Concerns About Slavery Dear James Hovland, I want to see, an end to modern -day slavery, a crime that continues today and is present ever here in our city. I respectfully ask that you help make our city a leader in the fight to end slavery. The first place to start is to ensure that our law enforcement are trained to identify victims of trafficking. Once victims of;trafficking have been identified, we need a system in place that ensures the safety and rehabilitation of victims. Our law enforcement should be equipped to conduct proactive, victim - centered trafficking investigations and be prepared to help with the prosecution of trafficking crimes. I respectfully ask that you allocate funding in your budget for training of law enforcement. At a minimum, I want our police department to have one officer trained as a point - person for cases of human trafficking and slavery. Victims of-human trafficking face a horrific life in which they are threatened, beaten,. raped, starved, locked up,' or psychologically manipulated -.all for the financial profit of human'traffickers. I urge you to help us in this fight. To notify voters in our area about what your administration is doing to protect the victims of human trafficking in our city and to prosecute those who perpetrate this crime, please e-mail a copy'of an open letter or statement on the issue to: mycity_na,slaveryfootprint.org. Sincerely, Lauren Bank laurenbank car gmail.com 0 1 Susan Howl Officer Pesek - I wanted to personally thank you for your assistance with my family and, particularly, my daughter (Ellie) who was struck by a vehicle at 50th and Arden last night while crossing the street. I was not at the scene along with wife to witness it, but my entire family said the quick response and professional yet personable approach you had with our kids helped alleviate an already stressful situation. As I spent the evening with my daughter at Children's Hospital getting X -ray's she clutched your "trading" card to her chest and kept staring at it surely bringing her comfort. At the end of the night, she said while pointing to your card, "Daddy, she was the first one at the accident and the last one to leave ". While I cannot imagine the emotional distress of being five and having your foot run over by a car while doing everything the way she was taught (look both ways, only walk in crosswalks, make sure the drivers of cars see you, etc), I can assure you that your approach with her and my entire family made a very bad situation much better. Thank you, again, and please do not hesitate to let me know if there is anything I can ever do to help you. My very kindest regards, Brett Casebolt Chairman and CEO Puretein Bioscience LLC 612.455.5533 Direct 612.749.0497 Mobile brett@PTBio.com Susan Howl _.......... .. _ ......... From: Kate Cassell [mailto:Kate Cassell(Well.coml Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 9:49 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: RE: Edinborough Park vot on July 17 1 am writing to urge the City Council to follow the recommendations of the Edina Park Board and keep the pool in Edinborough Park. In my Senior Aerobics class, there are people recovering from joint replacements and heart surgery. If Edina wants to remain a Blue Cross "do.town ", we need to keep promoting exercise and rehabilitation. The city spends many dollars establishing bike lanes that generate no revenue to the city. The city also has many lovely parks with playground equipment for young children. Are these amenities for children expected to be self - supporting? Please do not balance the budget on the backs of your senior citizens. Again, I urge you on July 17th to vote to accept the Edina park Board's recommendation to keep the pool. Thank you, Mary Cassell Edina, MN From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:Ibiunno(cbEdinaMN.govl On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:52 AM To: Kate Cassell Subject: RE: Edinborough Park Dear Mary, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members, City Manager Scott Neal, and Park & Recreation Director, John Keprios. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(a) dinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learn.i.ng, Raising Families & . Doin,, Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Kate Cassell Lmailto:Kate Cassell(cbDell.coml Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:47 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edinborough Park But like lots of other public amenities out there– in America, not just in Edina– the cost of maintaining that amenity is borne by a much wider group of people than the people who enjoy the amenity." — from Scott Neill's blog 1 Scott's statement is true of many services for which all residents of a community pay — whether they use the services ar not. Edina seniors no longer have children in school, but these seniors still pay for schools through their property taxes. The children of Edina seniors are by now too old for the swings and slides used by younger children, but these seniors still pay for playground equipment through their property taxes. To have a valuable and affordable senior resource taken away is not only ageist, it is unfair to those who cannot afford the Y or Lifetime fitness. From his article, it reads like Scott has already decided on his view of the park's future. I hope that rest of the Edina decision makers are more open - minded. Mary Cassell Susan Howl From Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 9:14 AM To: ED Everyone; Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Subject: May 2012 Website Report Good morning! Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of May 2012: Total visits: 124,315 Number of visitors: 53,442 Total number of hits: 3,303,974 Average time of each visit: 10 minutes, 52 seconds Total page views: 304,814 Average page views per day: 9,832 .Busiest day;of the month: May 7 with 144,342 hits Besides the home page, the most visited page was the blog selection page where a user can opt to read the City Manager's, Edina Liquor, Park &Recreation, Police Chiefs, Public Works and "Name Your Neighborhood" blogs, with 14,577 visits. Other top pages included the following (with number of visits): Blog Comments — 3,746 Contacts — 2,986 Edina Aquatic Center— 2,834 Job Listings — 2,814 Parks & Recreation Department — 2,603 Search — 2,463 Centennial Lakes Park —1,932 Permits &Applications —1,901 Edina Aquatic Center General Information —1,889 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the Centennial Lakes Park summer entertainment calendar, which was downloaded 36,333 times. Other frequently downloaded files included the following (with number of downloads): Bike Plan — 11,459 Spring /Summer Activities Directory -- 6,114 Edina Liquor Spring Sale catalog — 4,935 West 70th Street Landscaping Concepts — 3,088 Planned Unit Development Zoning Ord_ inance Information - 2,555 Winter 1012 About Town -- 1,758 Brochure for new and prospective employees —1,613 Commercial Building Permit Package —1,396 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7 (Transportation) —1,200 Ecommerce totaled more than $71,471.13 in May. Top sales were Edina Aquatic Center season passes, $26,44337; Art Center program registrations, $11,997; tennis program registration, $3,578; Mini -Hawks program registration, $1,271; Fab 4 & 5 program registration, $1,175; and ventilation cleaning permit, $805. We have been streaming video on our website through Granicus for several years. In May, there were 519 views through Granicus. The most requested videos on Granicus in May were the May 1 City Council meeting, 93 views; May 15 City Council meeting, 84; April 17 City Council meeting, 33; May 9 Planning Commission meeting, 20; May 23 Planning Commission meeting, 20; April 3 City Council meeting, 17; April 25 Planning Commission meeting, 14; Nov. 15 City Council meeting, 14; Nov. 7 Park Board meeting, 12; and May 8 Park Board meeting, 12. We have been streaming all programming on YouTube since January 2011. In May, there were 2,319 views on the City's YouTube channel. The most requested videos on YouTube in May 2012 Taste of Edina promo, 108 views; Centennial Lakes Park Winter Ice Festival story on "Agenda: Edina," 72; late May 2012 episode of "Agenda: Edina," 64; underage drinking public service announcement (PSA), 56; May 1 City Council meeting, 51; Braemar Golf Dome commercial featuring "Fred," 48; Welcome to Edina video, 45; Edina St. Stephens's Church construction, 44; and May 2012 episode of "Beyond the Badge," 42. Please continue to review our new website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, contact Communications & Technology Services Director Jennifer Bennerotte, 952 - 833 -9520. If you have things that need to be fixed, please write to helpdesk @EdinaMN.gov. I will send out the June website report as soon as I'm able to gather stats from the new website for the last week of the month. Thanks! Have a great day! Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director 952 - 833 -9520 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Jl3ennerotte0DEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, learning, Raising Families &. lloing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! For Immediate Release: Revised and updated 6/28/2012 Contact: Lynda Smith: 612.920.1900 Cell: 612.644.8960 worth4007@msn.com Arthur Murray Dance Studios Celebrate 100 Years of Teaching the World to Dance! Twin Cities Arthur Murray Studios are holding a celebration at the Mall of America on Thursday, July 26, from 7:00 — 9:00 pm. Included will be performances of various eras of dancing, lessons on a variety of dances, and open dancing. The event is open to the public and no dance experience is needed to participate and have fun. As America's second oldest franchise organization, Arthur Murray Studios are known as the leader in the dance industry with locations across the globe. The first Arthur Murray Franchised School of Dance was opened in Minneapolis in 1938. It has been in continuous operation ever since. There are now over 250 franchised schools in 17 countries, and we are proud to have been the first. With the rise of ballroom dancing in pop culture, Arthur Murray Dance Studios will remain the premier establishment for those seeking to join the fun! All are welcome and invited to attend this celebration. '/ J,a`� jAw1.iY ICjnu iq,ey �d Or � n �! Crlcb rat lnR a 100 `y YEARS 'J N Since 7772 a r �Celmrmmp �.� 1, 100, YEA 148 Lynda L. Smith Minneapolis Franchisee Area IV Chairperson 28 June 2012 Honorable James Hovland Mayor, Edina, Minnesota Dear Mayor Hovland, In 1912, a young immigrant New Yorker named Moses Teichmann taught his first dance lesson in New York City. He later changed his name to Arthur Murray, and now — 100 years later — the company that still carries his naive is celebrating his endeavors of teaching the world to dance! The Twin Cities were a major player in the success of Arthur Murray's enterprise. Arthur Murray was a pio- neer in developing the franchise system, and the first Arthur Murray Franchised School of Dance was opened in Minneapolis in 1938, making it the second oldest franchise in the United States. The Minneapo- lis /Edina location is still open today, and has been one of the most successful schools in the company as well as a success in the 50`h & France Business District for many years running. There are now over 250 fran- chised schools in 17 countries, and we are proud to have been the first. We would like you to consider July 26, 2012, as a proclamation of Arthur Murray Day for Edina. We will be holding a celebration on that day at the Mall of America Rotunda in honor of Mr. Murray's growing leg- acy. We would be greatly honored if you would join us for this celebration and for the proclamation of Ar- thur Murray Day. Thank you for considering this proposal. Lynda Smith Franchisee Minneapolis /Edina Arthur Murray Dance Studio 'r 4 fiC „1i6:' . � , : �s: r +w ` "ra t4aF ': `'Tr°�� { Ro a .f' 'i` ea3t :`d t 50th & France Edina 1 5041 France Ave South Minneapolis, MN 55410 612.920.1900 email: learn @arthurmurraympls.com www.aithut-murraympis.com SOUTHWEST TRANSIT 13500 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952 - 949 -2BU5 • www.swtranslt.org June 28, 2012 William Hargis, Chair Transportation Advisory Board 390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Chair Hargis, The purpose of this letter is to request that the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reconsider its recent action related to the CMAQ grant awards, and revisit the recommendation from its advisory committees (TAB Funding and Programming, Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC), and the CMAQ Scoring Committee) that recommended CMAQ funding for project CMT -11 -07 SouthWest Transit's (SWT) TH 169 & Pioneer Trail Park and Ride. It is SWT's understanding that at the June 201h TAB meeting, SWT's CMAQ application was removed from consideration after concerns were voiced that SWT's project would overlap the CMAQ project request put forth by the City of Shakopee, that the point differential between SWT's and the next highest ranked project was too great, and because of uncertainty surrounding the funding of operations from the proposed P & R facility. Each will be described further below. Overlapping Service - The analysis put forth in SWT's application showed a relatively small number of users coming from Shakopee's closest Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) to SWT's proposed facility. The analysis showed 78 out of a total of 309 users coming from Shakopee by 2020, and 110 out of a total of 391 users coming from Shakopee by 2030. Given that SWT's project proposal was only for a 300 -stall facility, even without any projected users from Shakopee, the facility would be at 94% capacity by 2030; demonstrating a clear future demand for the facility just from Eden Prairie and Bloomington alone. Today, SWT has a higher number of Shakopee residents utilizing our current facilities in Eden Prairie than what was put forth in the application. It should also be noted that this analysis was completed using the Metropolitan Council's Demand Estimation Methodology and was reviewed by both Metro Transit and City of Shakopee staff prior to being submitted. Point Differential —The justification to remove SWT's proposed project from consideration based on its evaluation score relative to the next highest project score creates a number of issues that need to be further reviewed. The fact that the advisory committees recommended the project for approval in two different recommendations demonstrates that the project has merit. While there is a seemingly large point differential between SWT's proposed project and the next highest ranked project, the point differential is really no greater than between Project #1 and Project #2 in the transit category. Today SWT has a small /50 stall park- and -ride lot in the area being proposed (TH169 and Anderson Lakes Road). Because of the lot size limitations and our agreement with the property owner (Preserve Shopping Center), we are not able to expand our operations to provide adequate service to this area to meet current as well as projected demand: This project also shows promise because it fits a more refined niche geared toward serving the densely populated area of southeastern Eden Prairie (an area that has diversified mixes of housing types and income levels). The bottom line Is that this project would provide transit options for a corridor that is underserved in the southwestern area of our metropolitan region. Funding of Operations - SWT's CMAQ application was only for a capital project and funds to run operations from this facility was not overlooked but omitted from the application by design. SWT Transit has a long history of building successful park and ride facilities. Our past practices have always been that if a facility cannot be supported from day one within a current or projected operating budget, then we do not feel it would be within the region's best interest to apply CMAQ funds toward the construction of any facility. Because SWT chooses to approach CMAQ funding projects In this manner, we do not believe we should be penalized for an approach we see as being fiscally prudent. Given the reasoning and information put forth in this letter, I respectfully request that the TAB reconsider its position as soon as possible. SWT staff would be happy to address the TAB with any questions or concerns it may have. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this request. Sincerely, `ns � YcTa - Luke Chair, SouthWest Transit Commission Mayor, City of Eden Prairie cc: Susan Haigh, Chair, Metropolitan Council Gary Van Eyll, Metropolitan Council Jennifer Munt, Metropolitan Council Steve Elkins, Metropolitan Council Randy Maluchnik, TAB Member — Carver County Jan Callison, TAB Member Hennepin County Jon Ulrich, TAB Member —Scott County James Hovland, TAB Member— Edina Thomas Heffelfinger, TAB Member — District B Bethany Tjornhom, TAB Member— Chanhassen Aaron Isaacs, TAB Member — Transit David Van Hattum, TAB Member - Transit Len Simich, SWT CEO Mayor Jim Hovland. I would like to call your attention to a law enforcement problem. Earlier this month, an unfamiliar vehicle was parked across the street opposite my driveway for several days. Parking opposite a driveway makes ingress and egress more difficult, and which I consider rude anyway. After five days, I called the police dept. to see if this car belonged to anyone legitimate. The owner of the corner house where the car was parked (5229 Maddox Ln) is a recluse and uses the side street for his vehicles where the garage is located. No one ever uses the front door, and there has been a trash can in front of it for a year. Shortly after my call, Tim Hunter chalked the car's tires. Later, he came back and put a ticket on the windshield. He did nothing to find out who belonged to the car, or even give a warning. It turns out the car was from out of town and here for a family funeral. Later, the reclusive owner came to my house ready to kill me. I was gone, so he "talked" to my wife instead. The next day, I talked to an officer at the police department. He said there is a law in Edina that no one can park on the street for more than six hours - a law no one knows about. (Everyone is aware of winter parking.) The officer said he could not cancel the ticket or convert it to a warning once it's issued. I think it would be good to let the Edina public know about the 6 -hour parking restriction in the next Edina About Town quarterly, along with other "neighborly" laws. I recommend the police do some investigating of a situation like this, and perhaps issue a warning ticket, rather than immediately going to the full blown ticket. I can see stopping speeders that pass through town. But the police can be more service oriented and helpful to the residents in cases like this. A lot of communities mark their police cars with "Protect and Serve ". Edina does not do this. I'm hoping you can help ameliorate this type of situation. Grateful for your service, Jim Bentley 5228 Maddox Ln, 55436 952 - 920 -3980 P.S. I appreciate all the time you spend supporting the various organizations around town and the many hours you spend making Edina an exceptional place to live. U.S. Department of Homeland Security UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE •raQ° June 19, 2012 Suite 750 U.S. Courthouse 300 South Fourth Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 Chief Jeff Long Edina Police Department 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55 24 Dear Chi ong: I am writing to thank you for the outstanding support the Edina Police Department provided to the U.S. Secret Service during President Obama's visit to Golden Valley on June 1, 2012. As you know, security planning and operations for visits of this type are a monumental effort and require the collaboration, resources and cooperation of a multitude of law enforcement and public safety officials and institutions. Officers from your department worked seamlessly with the Secret Service, the State Patrol and the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office to provide route security for the presidential motorcade through Edina and other parts of Hennepin County. The collaborative and extremely professional efforts of your department are commendable and an excellent example of why the law enforcement community in Minnesota enjoys such an excellent reputation with the Secret Service throughout the United States. It was a pleasure working with the Edina Police Department. We are grateful for your partnership not only through this protective visit, but through my agency's daily interaction with your department on the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. The dedication, professionalism, flexibility, and adaptability demonstrated by members of your department are noteworthy and are a contributing factor for the success of this presidential visit and the Financial Crimes Task Force. I sincerely look forward to working with you in the future. Please do not hesitate to contact me if the Secret Service can ever be of assistance to you or the Edina Police Department. Since�,el , Louis t hens Special Agent in Charge Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:16 PM To: Susan Faus Cc: Susan Howl; Ann Kattreh; John Keprios Subject: FW: Edinborough Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Susan Faus, Ann Kattreh and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Erik Hinkie Imailto:hinkner @gmail.coml Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:04 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edinborough Good afternoon, I'm writing in support of renovating the Edinborough Park pool and having it become the official home of the Edina Swim Club. As a father of three young children that have grown up playing at Edinborough, and with one child in the Edina Swim Club, I can personally attest to the incredible resource Edinborough is in it's entirety- the quiet spaces, Adventure peak, gym, birthday party venue, amphitheater, and pool. Keep the pool! On a final note, I read in a Star Tribune article a proposal to save money by removing plants and trees. I recognize the cost savings involved with the reduction in staff to maintain these plants. However, please don't overlook the value that green space provides in the depth of Winter. There are very few places in the greater Twin Cities Area that provide that type of green space. Rather than removing the plants, please consider further raising fees in areas like pool rental and birthday parties. Thank you, Erik Hinkie 5547 Malibu Drive Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl N:< Subject: Re: Edinborough Lynette, I,forgot something in my message... could you append the following suggestion?. "Another option to consider regarding the tree'and plant maintenance is to pull together a volunteer corp to tend to the plants. I.wouldn't be surprised if you had a lot of folks in that building alone that would be willing to take on some caretaking responsibilities. It would get folks otherwise inactive, active, provide a sense of community, pride, and purpose, and get the job done at the same time." Erik a •. ----- Original:Message -- - From'. Erik Hinkie f mailto:hinkner @gmail.com] Sent -Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:04 PM "7o: Edina Mail Subject: Edinborough Good afternoon, I'm writing in support of renovating the Edinborough Park pool and having it become the official home of the Edina Swim Club. As a father of three young children that have grown up playing at Edinborough, and with one child in the Edina Swim Club,.l. can personally attest to the incredible resource Edinborough is in it's entirety- the quiet spaces, Adventure peak, gym, birthday party venue, amphitheater, and pool. Keep the pool!', On a final note, I read in a Star Tribune article a proposal to save money by removing plants and trees. I recognize the cost savings involved with the reduction in staff to, maintain these plants. However, please don't overlook the value that green space provides in the depth of Winter. There are very few places in the greater.Twin Cities Area that provide that type of green space. Rather than removing the plants, please consider further raising fees in areas like pool rental and birthday parties. Thank you, Erik Hinkie 5547 Malibu Drive Edina, MN 55436 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Thank You To All! From: Michael Frey Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:30 AM To: Ilydesigns(�msn.com; barbara. lava Ileur @ gmail.com; patriciabeav(abgmail.com; B E AMACHER Owner; Amy Kerber; Bill McCabe (wjmccabe4 @ymail.com); marklidke(&gmail.com; Anne Spooner; annarosepugh(dgmail.com; 'Kristen Arden'; Tom Brewitz'; 'Heidi Hoy'; 'Roger Junk'; 'maxgraces @aol.com'; 'Peter Vanni'; genevievechamb @gmail.com; 'fames bearden'; 'Joel carter' Cc: James Hovland; jonibennettl2(dcomcast.net Subject: Thank You To All! I wanted to send this note of thanks and congratulations to both the Edina Public Art Committee and to the artists for your dedication, commitment and passion for the creation and public display of artwork. It was a wonderful event last evening to celebrate those that enrich our lives with art. I want to thank everyone on the Public Art Committee for their hard work throughout the year that culminated with the reception last night. All of you did a tremendous job! Also, I want to thank the artists for their presence and stories last evening. We missed those of you that could not attend. Thank You! Michael Frey, Interim Art Center Director 952 - 903 -5729 1 Fax 952 - 903 -5781 EI4�,�, Ceil3 mfreyPEdinaMN..qov I www.EdinaArtCenter.com Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! Susan Howl From: Suzanne Sullivan rmailto:suzannemsullivan @ q.coml Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:38 PM To: 'Edina @EdinaMN.gov' Subject: Accessibility in Edina Parks Greetings, I am an Edina resident. I reside at 4409 Country Club Road. I am writing you today about my wish to provide Edina with a universal playground. I have three young boys ages 8, 6 and 4. My six year old son has profound disabilities and requires a wheelchair for his mobility. Ou' house is directly behind Wooddale Park. We.are frequent visitors of this park and enjoy its proximity to our house. Each time we visit the park, I have the experience of sitting with my middle son while we watch his brothers play. He occasionally goes in the ADA compliant swing, but only if he's alert that day and has enough strength to sit up and enjoy it. He benefits greatly from the vestibular movement, but not so much from the slouching and slipping down in the swing. The park department has provided me with strap that attaches to the swing to secure him in it, but I need to bring it with me whenever we choose to visit the park. As for other activities, there are none. As I mentioned earlier, we sit and watch. On days when we have extra time and plan ahead, I'm able to drive to Eden Prairie and visit Miller Park. If you are not familiar with Miller Park it was recently renovated in a private /public partnership as an accessible playground. The parents of a nine year old girl with Cerebral Palsy, Mike and Jenny Garvin worked in partnership with the City of Eden Prairie to create this beautiful park. Besides the swing, which offers better support and a non - removable five point harness, the park offers a fully accessible splash pad, an accessible sand and water table, a large playground apparatus that my son can wheel up on and actually be up with all the other children. He can-look down from the equipment instead of always looking up AND most importantly a pour in place rubber surface. No woodchips, no tiny pebbles which get caught in his chair and cause him to get stuck. As,a member of the Edina ECSE Site Council, I recently worked with the Edina Community Center, where my two youngest have gone to preschool, to add some more accessible playground equipment in their courtyard. Because of this work I've been inspired to create a universal playground for the city of Edina. I've been in contact with John Keprios in the Parks Department and he has been researching the timing and cost for such a project, specifically at the Wooddale Park location. I am part of the Country Club Neighborhood Association and have had enthusiastic response from many people in the neighborhood. My hope is to gather funding from private donations via events and /or fundraisers and perhaps state and federal grants to make this idea into reality. I am eager to provide the leg work necessary to make this universal playground a reality in Edina. As I am sure you know, this type of project can only bring positive attention to the community,and benefits all children, typically developing and a kids with disabilities: Learning to play together and recognizing that:differences shouldn't exclude any child is a message that will stay with children as they grow into adulthood. I would welcome the opportunity to speak to you regarding the proper step's in which to approach a project such as this: As I said I am willing to gather private funding if necessary and work with the city and vendors to see this project come to life. Please let me know what I can do from my end to get the ball rolling: Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Sue SuIlWan. 6.12-558- or 952 - 929 -9 055 http:// suIlivanedinaboys.blogsp6t.com/ z BURNS.VILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 100 Civic Center Parkway Burnsville, MN 55337 (952) 895 -4570 1 www.burnsville.org Date: 6 -19 -2012 . To: Chief Scheerer, FF /P Pete Fischer, FF /P Brandon Winkel Hi Marty, v I had to give you a heads up on 2 of your FF /Medics. I want you to thank them sincerely from my family on the compassion ahvmpathy that they showed to my mom on 4 -19 Bonnie Latourell. They responded to my folk's house at 6905 Creston Rd. My mom fell that night after coming home from the Masonic home only 2 days prior for a total knee. She was there for rehab 4 weeks and was really excited to be home with my dad. Unfortunately she fell on both knees and FX her distal femur in 10 places. She was in extreme pain and I heard from dad how gently they handled her. I really appreciate what they did! Mom has now been back at the Masonic home for rehab and has been there for 8 weeks know. It's been pretty brutal but she just took her 15t steps yesterday 20 to be exact and we are hoping her progress keeps heading in the right direction. Please thank Pete and Brandon for the wonderful job they did! Regards, Lee LaTourelle - a' Fire Marshal I l j 1 b -7 - /a— J O Ms. Lou Holdnd e 4132 W 62nd 51 Edina, MN 55424 -1902 I �I Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:59 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: "Gangs In The Hood" Attachments: W. 70th & West Shore Dr..jpg Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doin.- Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy cho ce the easy choicel From: Joe Florenzano Lmailto :vikingstwinsmanCd)gmail.com1 Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 6:44 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: "Gangs In The Hood" Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, The subject line was intended to get your attention because this is a serious matter. Our sidewalks on W. 70th Street are being marked up with graffiti (see the attached photo). A utility company (Excel ?) with red spray cans is having fun at our expense. I went for a walk today on 70th St. and this is what I saw on most of our sidewalks. The corner of 70th & West Shore Dr. is the newest sidewalk to be "tagged ", because there is a new house being built at this location. This is very upsetting to me, because these "tags" by a utility company, don't have to be so destructive to property. In my opinion, it looks like the utility company is hiring former gang members. who really enjoy their job. All joking aside, I feel the City of Edina needs to clean-up these permanent markings on our W. 70th Street sidewalks. Many of these concrete sidewalks were newly poured several months ago. This is really a crime because this paint does not fade and is not washable. A better solution may be to have the utility company, responsible for these tags, clean -up our sidewalks. Thank you, Joe Florenzano 4712 West 70th St. r �� r J aN .,t ' -b . � ':.•; �, ._, �::- l i �_- i'� _, �r� �� _ ��� .c �. .... �- --- -- -- -- - --- _ ,c,ak..c _ -- - — — - -- — _ �.,,.ra�..wsr � � - - =z :,� . M y�1 �' � '- 'i'k.�.. � ° a' � � � :+ _i � u.'S't � ice' �`C r,�.�a"�n� � �F ``x �5 !�J�� �" ti yi?��+' W"' 1. Yis � '.. '..� fib � ��G':• J `� �y ,��r�� ' _ � .� r �I - ., � -. �l �,�i_ r � is ,', �: �� ,. _ , .+'''. � �: ' "C 7 .. - �• �' i �', - - 'a�� fir' � �. - lY L . y {�+ 7 r A , " F` . • r . _ Y �'h.. .,,.w r. �j < ., *� � � �. . t� ^5% w <'�S ?' � : v r, a i' "L �'` h��. J�� �^ �+t '�. � E .4-x,4 �'� F.u'��' :..q ,, �� .. - .� ' i 'ii S� ��% tY *� ''(( i ' �. r .r��[[rr �'s�S} +k_'��%!�"LL�,� "i'�-`k� %.- �'��''e"`.Y t�° }i. '�.. ���FF-- 11) .! Z�f. �i Z .y3i �`K � �i�Y 5� 2 i R �� r.� ��F� � rtA �. 3� �O .'Y.. a , i°� r N'E _ ..J9'�rr �_'� ., „ .v;.. � _ .. � . ?!?�`�. _'�� ��KF, c•^i4'�i+-.- «.�..�'' i�aL�.t� - +;c _ �.S,S�7,. '.. .._ - si �.. ECHO Minnesota Emergency, Community, Health; and Outreach June 19, 2012 C Deb Mangan 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Deb, BE Bums BE wL BE Bwy. On behalf of Emergency, Community Health, and Outreach (ECHO) and the communities we serve, thank you for proving.video broll for ECHO's most recent program, "Voting and the Democratic -Process " Your partnership and assistance helps us reach out to thousands of people each month, providing very important information to Limited English Proficiency (LEP) populations across the Twin Cities Metro Area and the state of Minnesota in the languages they know best. Without the visual resources provided by your organizations and others, we would not have been able to illustrate the content of.this program as successfully as we were able to with your support. We were fortunate to receive a wealth of broll footage and in the end, only used a portion of what we received. All resources used in the final program were highlighted in the credits, however, we wanted to acknowledge everyone who supported us as we sincerely appreciated your time and effort. The "Voting and the Democratic Process" episodes are broadcasting on tptMN on select dates in July and October — please see the enclosed flier for more details. The videos are also available any time to stream at echominnesota.org /library/voting- and - democratic - process. I hope that you will watch this show and that you will tune in to ECHO TV each month. After the broadcast, this program will remain an active part of ECHO resources for viewing or downloading on our website (www.echominnesota.org). Up -to -date information on ECHO TV schedules, as well as critical health and safety information on over 70 topics is available at our website: www.echominnesota.org. Please take a moment to visit us there and subscribe to receive updates on ECHO activities. You can also find information about a variety of topics in ten different languages by.calling our toll free phone line (888- 883 -8831) or receiving information from our partners who help' circulate ECHO materials locally in their clinics, libraries and other sites across Minnesota. We appreciate your continued,support by providing these important resources to those in your community by spreading the word about ECHO: Again, thank you for supporting ECHO TV -and for working with us to ensure that everyone has access to the information they need to be healthy, be safe and be ready. With Gratitude, �.sBlina 0�� Lillian McDonald, Executive Director 651.789.4342 Y McDonald @echominnesota.org ECHO c/o Association of Minnesota Counties 125 Charles AN= Saint Paul, MH 55103 Ip1651.224.3344 info @echominnesota.or9 www.echominnesota.org < ECH BE HEALTHY. BE SAFE. BE READY. This Program Sponsored by: CF Knight Foundation TleMINNEAPOLIS , FOUNDATION ,W / in Collaboration with: CAPI — USA Citizens for Election Integrity — MN League of Women Voters MN Council of Nonprofits MN Schools Employee Association MN Secretary of State's Office For more information about topic and resources, visit echominnesota.org /library/ voting- and - democratic - process To request a DVD of this program in email ECHO at info @echominneosta.org For more information about ECHO activities contact: Lillian McDonald, Executive Director 651 - 789 -4342 info @echominnesota.org www.echominnesota.org 9i Q. Voting and the Democratic Process One thing that makes the United States stand out is its system of government. We live in a democracy, which means the country's people make the decisions. This 30- minute program discusses the basics of voting and the democratic process, including voting eligibility, how to register to vote, voting on Election Day, and getting involved in ways other than voting. "Voting and the Democratic Process" will broadcast in four languages on tpt's Minnesota Channel (tptMN) — Comcast Channel 202 or 243, depending upon location: Sunday, July 1: English — 7:00 p.m. Spanish - 7:30 p.m. Sunday, October 7: Sunday.. July 8: Hmong - 7:00 p.m. Somali - 7:30 p.m. Sunday, October 14: English — 7:00 p.m. Hmong - 7:00 p.m. Spanish - 7:30 p.m. Somali - 7:30 p.m. Every person voting and getting involved in the democratic process can make a difference! This program is also available with English captions for the deaf and hard of hearing at www.echominnesota.org. %901. July 27, 2012 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 50"' St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor, In this past week, the Supreme Court of the United States refused to hear the case brought by the State of Montana (supported by 26 other States) where the State was asking the Court to review their decision in Citizens United as it applied to Montana laws prohibiting Corporate donations in State elections. Many observers had thought that the Court would at least hear the case as a means by which the,Cit!iens United decision could be revisited. As is now well known, the Court did not want to review the well know facts and 100 years of Montana history, and simply re- asserted that Citizens United applies to all elections throughout the country. It 1s a well documented fact now that vast amounts of money is flowing into the Federal Campaigns through various Super PACs, often times anonymously. Earlier in the year, it was reported that approximately 80% of the money flowing to these PACS has come from less than a 100 people.. The ability exists now for very rich people /organizations to literally overwhelm a candidate whom they wish to defeat. The fact that Mayor Barrett was outspent by Gov. Walker by a margin of 7 to 1 is a local example of how money (including out of state money) can influence the outcome of an election. Many grass roots organizations (Common Cause, Move to Amend, MPIRG, People For the American Way, and others) are working with local and state governments to promote the creation of an amendment to the US Constitution that would affirm that Corporations.are not People and Money is not Speech! Money can and must be regulated in the political area, and it is not too difficult to imagine city or county elections where outside money could easily flow into a campaign and literally swamp a candidate. Recently, the St. Paul and Minneapolis City councils unanimously approved resolutions in support of a Constitutional Amendment to overturn the effects of Citizens United. The city of Duluth had previously approved one. Copies of these three resolutions and other relevant information are included for your consideration. Much has been written in recent days as a result of the Montana decision, and various organizations are now mobilizing at city and state levels to urge Legislative and Congressional action to develop such an amendment. Rep. Keith Ellison has been a driving force in the House to make these changes. Already 4 states and 288 cities and towns have moved to advance such a measure. Voters in several states will be presented, in this Fall's elections, with the question of moving to a Constitutional amendment. U C I urge you and other members of the City Council to adopt a similar resolution. I would be pleased to provide additional information, speak to you individually or at a council meeting in support of this topic. As we now prepare to celebrate our country's founding on the 0 of July, we can see that the effects of Citizens United are seriously undermining the original concepts of our Constitution and the Bill of Rights that enshrine the rights of individualsl Since el , Beaver 5624 Melody Lake Drive Edina, Minn. 55436 Attachments: City of Minneapolis Resolution City of St. Paul Resolution City of Duluth Resolution My presentation to the Edina HRRC Commentary by the Brennan Center for Justice Commentary from Bloomberg Business Week RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS By Glidden, Gordon, Hbdges and Schiff supporting a United States Constitutional Amendment to Regulate Corporate Political Spending and Campaign Financing, Whereas, in 2010 the United States Supreme Court ruled In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission that corporate entities have the same free speech rights as ,natural persons; and Whereas, the rt Sbpreme Cou 's decision, in Citizens United,defined independent expenditures-as n .. a form of free speech and ruled that corporate entities have the, same rights as natural persons to unrestricted spending on political speech; and Whereas, corporations are not people but artificial entities.,bound by the laws of this country, this state, and this city; and Whereas, the Court's decision has the effect of permitting unlimited corporate spending ito influence fluence elections, campaigns, and public policy decisions; and Whereas, the Supreme Court's decision, which overturned some provisions of the federal Campaign Reform Act enacted in 2002, greatly encumbers the ability of federal, state Minneapolis to enact and enforce reasonable campaign ta i� and local. governments like M finance, regulations regarding corporate political activity; and Whereas since the Supreme Court's decision, there has been a significant growth in contributions and spending by Super PAC's f6r media messaging and Independent electioneering activities; and Whereas, government should require that permissible contributions and,. expenditures be publicly disclosed; and Whereas, several proposed amendments to the constitution have been introduced in Congress . that would allowlede'rai, state and local governments to. regulate the raising and expending of money by,co.rporatibns to influence elections and public policy decisions; and Whereas, the people ofthe United States have on several occasions used the constitution amendment. process to correct decisions of the United States Supreme Court widely. deemed, :to.be egregious or that are! wrongly decided or significantly out-of-step With - the prevailing 'values of the populace; Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved by the City Council of The City of Minneapolis: That the Uni . te'd States Congress begin the process of amending the U,nited States i Constitution with provisions that clearly. state that: 1. Corporations are not natural persons, ersons, and only natural persons are endowed Constitutional rights. 2. Congress and the States shall have the power to regulate contributions andexpenditures for elections and campaigns and to require public disclosure of the sources of the contributions and expenditures. 2 Be It Further Resolved that a copy of this resolution be sent to members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation. 3 k,1,� a G do ^ 0��f�T iee• 0: File M RES 12 -554, Version: 2 City of Saint Paul Legislation Text City Hall and Court House 15 West Kellogg Boulevard Phone: 651 - 266 -8560 Title Supporting an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that corporations are not persons. Body WHEREAS, government of, by, and for the People has long been a cherished American value, and a fundamental and inalienable right of the People to self -govern and thereby secure rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and WHEREAS, free and fair elections are essential to democracy and effective self - govemance; and WHEREAS, Citizen's United v. Federal Election Commission, 130 S.Ct. 876 (2010), rolled back legal limits on corporate spending in the electoral process and allowed unlimited corporate spending to influence elections, candidate selection, and policy decisions, thereby threatening fair elections by and for the People; and Whereas, The Court's decision in Citizens United hampers the ability of federal, state, and local governments to enact reasonable campaign finance reforms and regulations regarding corporate political activity; and Whereas, in his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens recognized that "[u]nlike natural persons, corporations have 'limited liability' for their owners and managers, 'perpetual life,' separation of ownership and control, 'and favorable treatment of the accumulation and distribution of assets' ... corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires. Corporations help structure and facilitate the activities of human beings, to be sure, and their'personhood' often serves as a useful legal fiction. But they are not themselves members of 'We the People' by whom and for whom our Constitution was established," 130 S.Ct. 876, 972, and WHEREAS, corporations are not and have never been human beings; and Whereas, corporations should not be personified and granted constitutional rights guaranteed to individual human beings such that the expenditure of corporate money to influence the electoral process is a form of constitutionally protected speech above reasonable regulation; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Paul City Council supports amending the United States Constitution to provide that corporations are not entitled to the entirety of protections or "rights" of human beings, specifically so that the expenditure of corporate money to influence the electoral process is no longer a form of constitutionally protected speech, and calls on Congress to begin the process of amending the Constitution. Page 1 of 1 Printed on 6/1112012 City of Saint Paul or - -, Leg -tar-- COUNCIL COPY INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE , 11 -0691R RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME CITIZENS COURT DECISION IN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FORCORPORATE ENTITIES TO . TO BY COUNCILOR ANDERSON: l movements, both nationally and within the ,state WHEREAS, there are severa .. of Minnesota to amend the respective Constitutions of each body relating to corporate personhood; and council believes that the rights protected by the WHEREAS, the Duluth city Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the state of Minnesota are rights of natural persons only; and WHEREAS, artificial entities such as corporations, limited liability by the laws of any State, the United companies, and other entities established States, or any foreign state are subject to regulation by the people through federal, state or local law; and WHEREAS, the privileges of artificial entities should be determined by the people and should not be construed to be inherent or inalienable; and . WHEREAS, federal, state or local government should regulate, limit, or prohibit contributions and expenditures of candidates for public office, p rohibit the including a candidate's own contributions and expenditures, to p election of any candidate for public office or any ballot influencing of an measure; and WHEREAS, government should require that any permissible contributions and publicly disclosed; and expen ditures be p to WHEREAS, the judiciary should not construe the spending of money influence elections to be speech under the First Ameccil hereby supports the THEREFORE, B Amendment. IT RESOLVED, that the Duluth city efforts to reject the United States Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (130 S.Ct. 876 (2010). ), and expresses its support to nd national Constitutions to firmly establish that money is not amend our state a speech, that human beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights, and that whenever the word "person" is used in the constitution it means a natural person. d as to form: Rttorney CCREQ /ATTY GBJ:cjk 12/13/2011 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: This resolution is an expression of opposition to the recent Supreme Court decision referred to as Citizens United which granted certain Constitutional rights to artificial entities such as corporations. This resolution further expresses support for efforts to amend the. United States and state of Minnesota constitution to clarify that human,beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights. F Edina Human Rights Commission Notes on "Citizens United" Supreme Court decision and "Corporate Personhood" Introduction and Purpose ► Laird Beaver ► Edina Resident, 5624 Melody Lake Drive ► To provide some background on the ,January 2010, Supreme Court decision referred to as "Citizens United" which granted Corporations and Labor Unions constitutional rights with regard to Speech. 6/27/2012 1 6/27/2012 Citizens United Decision This decision essentially defined corporations/ unions as groups of individuals and hence their l st Amendment rights to free speech cannot be abridged, and that independent expenditures are a form of speech therefore limiting a corporation's or union's ability to spend money would be a limitation on speech, which is protected. Supreme Court commentary The following is a quote from Justice Stevens reflecting his dissent in the Minority on the Citizens United decision. "... corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires. Corporations help structure and facilitate the activities of human beings, to be sure, and their 'personhood' often serves as a useful legal fiction. But they are not themselves members of 'We the People" by whom and for whom our Constitution was established." Supreme Court Justice Stevens, January 2010 2 6/27/2012 Effect of this Decision o "Corporate Personhood" has resulted in huge sums of money (10's or 100's of Millions of Dollars) flowing into our national electoral system, where it is now unregulated and the source of the money need not be disclosed. P Hence, a small number of wealthy individuals and Corporations/ Unions are now able to spend vast sums to support or defeat selected candidates, with huge influence now in our electoral and governing processes. Other effects of this decision Corporations have also recently sought Constitutional Protections in the following areas: • 1 st Amendment - Right to free speech • 4th Amendment- Illegal search and seizure. • 5th Amendment - Due process • 14th Amendment - Equal protection 3 6/27/2012 Efforts to Address or Repeal Many grassroots organizations are now mobilized to urge a Constitutional Amendment to affirm that: • Corporations are not People • Money is not speech P Resolutions have been introduced/ passed in: • State Legislatures (including Minn and VT) • Counties (Dane County, Wis +) • Cities (Duluth, LA, NYC, Boulder, Madison, Wis, +) • Many other resolutions in process (St. Paul, +) other Efforts to Address 26 States cooperating to narrow the ruling In support of Montana's restrictions on spending P The Progressive Caucus in Congress supports a Constitutional amendment to reverse the Supreme Court Citizens United decision. 7$ Members in this group including: Rep. K. Ellison Move to Amend, Common Cause, the Coffee Party, Sierra Club plus many other groups are working at the grassroots to build support. 4 What can the City of Edina do? ► Consider and pass a resolution in support of the Constitutional Amendment that Corporations are not People, and Money is not Speech. ► This is consistent with the City's previous resolutions on Domestic Partnerships and Conflict Materials. What can the City of Edina do? ► Draft resolution provided for your consideration. o The City of Duluth resolution is provided. 6/27/2012 5 6/27/2012 Supporting Material ► Duluth Minnesota approved resolution ► Draft Resolution from `Move to Amend' ► Congressional Progressive Caucus note ► NYC City Council announcement ► LA City Council announcement ► State of Vermont announcement Star Tribune article (May 21) on 26 States cooperation. Supreme Court Lets Unlimited Money Stand, Ignores Extensive Record of Corruption I B... Page 1 of 3 BRAN NAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE di ,Neu- I' r k (Truer -d!y ScIJonl nj' ! -10V Brennan Center » Resources )) Press Releases Democracy » Campaign Finance Reform » Other Reforms » Disclosure Supreme Court Lets Unlimited Money Stand, Ignores Extensive Record of Corruption PRESS RELEASES –06125112 Brennan Center Submitted Amicus Brief Urging Court to Uphold Montana Election Law, Revisit Citizens United Contact: Erik Opsal, erik.opsal(a,nvu.edu, 646- 292 -8356 Washington, D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court today, by a 5 -4 vote, struck down Montana's 100- year -old ban on corporate election spending — without even allowing full briefing or argument in the case. The decision reverses a Montana Supreme Court decision, which upheld the law due to the state's dramatic history of corruption. In May, the Brennan Center submitted a friend -of -the -court brief urging the Court to uphold the law, and use the case to revisit the disastrous Citizens United ruling, which opened the door to unlimited spending in American elections. The brief, submitted on behalf of the Center and nine constitutional law professors in American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock, argued that Citizens United is untenable in light of the dominant role now being played in U.S. elections by super PACs and other outside groups. "The 2012 elections make one thing clear: unlimited spending by super PACs and secretive nonprofits is corrupting our political process and threatens to swamp our democracy," said Adam Skaggs, senior counsel in the Brennan Center's Democracy Program. "Increasing numbers of Americans believe our government is bought and paid for by special interests and that their votes don't matter. By not taking this case, the Court missed a critical opportunity to rein in some of the worst excesses of Citizens United, and other rulings, that created this super PAC mess." Montana banned corporate election spending for more than 100 years as a result of a dramatic history of efforts by big companies to capture the state government. The state of Montana compiled an extensive and powerful factual record that demonstrated how unlimited corporate spending previously held the state hostage to mining companies and still poses severe threats to Montana's elections and government. For the Court to strike down the state's anti- corruption law without even reviewing that record is a serious mistake. U,A . / /ixnxnx,l%rPnnnnr.Pnte.r_nrn/ content / resource /supreme— court_lets— unlimited money_sta... 6/27/2012 Supreme Court Lets Unlimited Money Stand, Ignores Extensive Record of Corruption I B... Page 2 of 3 By reversing the Montana court and not hearing the case, the Supreme Court also ensures that super PACs and other outside groups will continue to play a dominant role in U.S. elections. In Citizens United, the Court said that, based on the facts before it, "independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption." Lower courts extended this decision, reasoning that if outside spending cannot lead to corruption, then there is no legitimate basis for restricting how much can be donated to outside groups. This created super PACs, which can accept unlimited donations from corporations, unions, and individuals, and then spend those funds to support specific candidates. "Montana's experience, like considerable experience elsewhere since the Court's decision in Citizens United, casts grave doubt on the Court's supposition that independent expenditures do not corrupt or appear to do so," wrote Justice Stephen Breyer in dissent. The substantial evidence compiled in recent months shows that significant outside spending, by super PACs and other groups, creates a very real risk of corruption and the appearance of corruption. A few troubling examples: A super PAC dedicated to Newt Gingrich's election received almost all of its money from casino owner Sheldon Adelson and his family, who donated more than $20 million. Now that Gingrich is out of the race, Adelson has given $10 million to Romney's super PAC and a source close to Adelson says his future donations may be "limitless." Presidential candidates and their campaign staff appear at their super PACs' fundraising events and solicit funds for them, but these activities are still considered "independent" under the existing legal scheme. This defies common sense: candidates even refer to specific super PACs as "my super PAC." Super PACs have raised more than $234 million and have spent more than $131 million to influence federal election results — five months from the general election. In total, outside groups have already spent roughly $163 million on federal campaigns, double the amount spent in the same period in 2008. Although the Court missed a chance to undo some of the damage caused by Citizens United, the Brennan Center will continue working to correct that mistake, partnering with legal scholars and others to develop policies that put voters back in charge of elections. "To truly reform our elections, we must counter the power of big money in politics," said Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center. "We must adopt a small donor public financing system so that the voices of regular voters matter as much as fat -cat donors. We need to modernize voter registration to add more than 50 million eligible Americans to the rolls. And state and federal governments must pass disclosure laws to help guard against corruption that could result from political spending." Read the Brennan Center's research on New York City's successful public financing system and our proposal to modernize voter registration. See our Election 2012 paee for frequent updates on all voting rights and money in politics news. To set up an interview, please contact Erik Opsal at erik.opsal(c,nyu.edu or 646 - 292 -8356. 1+4i ./hinsniy HrP,,,,a „ r.Pnter_orn/ content / resource /supreme_court_lets_unlimited money_sta... 6/27/2012 Supreme Court Lets Unlimited Money Stand, Ignores Extensive Record of Corruption B... Page 3 of 3 Tags: Democracy, Campaign Finance Reform, Other Reforms, Disclosure Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law 1 161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th Floor I New York, NY 10013 646.292.8310 phone 1212.463.7308 fax I brennancenter(anvu.edu Washington, D.C. office 11730 M Street, NW, Suite 413 1 Washington, D.C. 20036 202.249.7190 phone 1 202.223.2683 fax I brennancenter(@nvu.edu httn- / /www.brennancenter.org/ content / resource /supreme_court_lets_ unlimited money_sta... 6/27/2012 Corporate Campaign Spending Rights Affirmed by High Court - Businessweek Page 1 of 4 Bloomberg Businessweek News From Bloomberg Corporate Campaign Spending Rights Affirmed by High Court By Greg Stohr and Julie Bykowicz on June 26, 2012 A divided U.S. Supreme Court threw out Montana's ban on corporate campaign spending in a reaffirmation of the 2010 decision that unleashed super -PACs and left federal elections awash in money from big spenders. Deciding they didn't need to hear arguments, the justices yesterday summarily reversed a Montana Supreme Court decision upholding the state's'century-old ban. The state court had ruled the law's limits could stand for state elections even after Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the two- year -old Supreme Court ruling that let corporations and unions spend unlimited sums. The court's unsigned opinion in the 5 -4 ruling said the case asked whether Citizens United applied to a state law. "There can be no serious doubt that it does," the court said. "Montana's arguments in support" of the lower court ruling "either were already rejected in Citizens United or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case," the opinion said. The majority was identical to the 5 -4 Citizens United decision, which altered the national political landscape and opened the way for campaign spending by outside groups to more than double from the level four years ago. Missed Opportunity The latest action makes clear the court's five Republican appointees stand behind their conclusion that corporate campaign spending is entitled to broad protection under the First Amendment. "Citizens United mistakenly overruled longstanding cases that protected the fairness and integrity of elections," White House spokesman Eric Schultz said in a statement yesterday. "Unfortunately, the court today missed an opportunity to correct that mistake." President Barack Obama criticized the Citizens ruling in his 2010 State of the Union address. He has since given his blessing to a super - political action committee supporting his re- election, saying it is necessary to compete with Republican challenger Mitt Romney. Obama campaign aides have said they expect to be outspent by Romney and his allies because of several super -PACs backing him. httn: / /www.businessweek.com/ printer /articles /267956?type= bloomberg 6/27/2012 Corporate Campaign Spending Rights Affirmed by High Court - Businessweek Page 2 of 4 More than 600 super -PACs have raised more than $240 million and spent $133 million this election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group in Washington. Nonprofit Organizations Nonprofit organizations that don't have to report donors have spent at least $12.4 million in this election cycle so far, according to the Sunlight Foundation, a Washington -based group that promotes campaign -fmance disclosure. The expenditures by super -PACs and nonprofits add up to more than twice what outside groups had spent by this point in the 2008 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said in court papers that "to the extent that there has been more speech in recent elections, that is a First Amendment good, not an excuse to resurrect a censorship regime." The business trade group opposed the Montana law. Outside spending on state and local races -- which include judgeships, ballot measures and gubernatorial and mayoral posts -- is more difficult to tally, in part because of differing disclosure requirements and deadlines. The National Institute on Money in State Politics, a campaign- finance research group in Helena, Montana, said that in a sample of 20 states, spending by groups other than candidates rose to $139 million in 2010 from $65 million in 2008. State Bans Critics of the Citizens United ruling had sought to leave room for spending bans at the state level, saying they guard against corruption. "The states have a compelling interest in preventing domination of state and local elections by nonresident corporate interests," argued New York, joined by 21 other states and the District of Columbia, in a court filing backing Montana in the case. "The decision today says that other states struggling to deal with corrupting political spending are essentially handcuffed," Adam Skaggs, senior counsel of the Brennan Center's Democracy Program at the New York University School of Law, said in an interview. "The court has removed a promising tool for states." U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican Senate minority leader from Kentucky, said in a statement the ruling is "another important victory for freedom of speech." There has been "only minimal corporate involvement in the 2012 election cycle," McConnell wrote in the statement and in a brief filed in support of the group seeking to toss out Montana's corporate political spending ban. Secret Donors httn- / /www.businessweek.com/ printer /articles /267956?type= bloomberg 6/27/2012 Corporate Campaign Spending Rights Affirmed by High Court - Businessweek Page 3 of 4 Those committees are required to report donors; many nonprofit groups that also spend money in elections may keep their donors secret. David Bossie, president of Citizens United, the nonprofit behind the Supreme Court case of the same name, said in a statement that the Montana decision is "another win.for the First Amendment." The five members of the Citizens United majority -- Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito =- remain on the court and made up the majority in yesterday's decision. Dissenting were Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. At the time of the 2010 Citizens United ruling, 22 states had laws banning or restricting spending by corporations and unions, according to a report this month by the Corporate.Reform Coalition, made up of 75 organizations and individuals from good - governance groups, environmental groups and organized labor. Those states generally repealed their limits or declared that their laws are unenforceable, according to the report. Appearance of Corruption The exception was Montana, which chose to continue enforcing its corporate money ban. At issue in the Montana case was the statement by the Citizens United majority that corporate campaign expenditures "do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption." That's an important conclusion because the court has allowed campaign-finance restrictions as a means of fighting corruption. Montana argued that local and state elections are especially susceptible to corruption from corporate spending. The Supreme Court put a hold on the law in February. Montanans enacted the 1912 Corrupt Practices Act by ballot initiative. In its 5 -2 ruling upholding the law, the Montana Supreme Court said the state had "unique and compelling interests" in barring corporate election spending. The majority pointed to the so- called "copper king" battle at the beginning of the 20th century, when entrepreneur Augustus Hemze and the Anaconda Co., controlled by Standard Oil, used their money to vie for dominance of the state's government. Shell of Authority When the law was enacted, "the state of Montana and its government were operating under a mere shell of legal authority, and the real social and political power was wielded by powerful corporate managers to further their own business interests, "the Montana court majority said. The Montana law barred direct election spending by corporations, including incorporated interest groups. Corporations must establish traditional political action committees, which can solicit voluntary contributions from employees. The committees were subject to contribution limits and disclosure requirements. l rr..- /kxnxnw h„q;ne%cweek.com/Drinter /articles /267956?type Bloomberg 6/27/2012 Corporate Campaign Spending Rights Affirmed by High Court - Businessweek Page 4 of 4 The challengers included American Tradition Partnership Inc., described on its website as opposed to "environmental extremism," the Montana Shooting Sports Association Inc., a gun rights and firearms - safety group, and Champion Painting Inc., a painting and drywall business with a single shareholder. The case is American Tradition Partnership v. Attorney General for the State of Montana, 11 -1179. To contact the reporters on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr @bloomberg.net; Julie Bykowicz in Washington at jykowicz @bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Komarow at skomarowl @bloomberg.net @2012 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved. Made in NYCAd Choices httn- / /www.h»cinegsweek.com /printer /articles/267956?tvpe= bloomberg 6/27/2012 0 WELANDER QUIST DAVIES CHAPEL C y ^301 Dupont Avenue S. W inneapolis, MN 55405 W � `( +'�►N /Y 6 1 2 ) 3 7 7 - 2 2 0 3 FUNERAL CL� IWETERIES ANO FAX: (612) 377 -7306 CRE AlsvlCEs June 22, 2012 Mayor James Hovland & City Council City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland & Members of the City Council: Washburn - McReavy Funeral Corporation Washburn - McReavy Funeral Chapels Inc. Washburn - McReavy Funeral Chapels LLC www.washburn- In creavy.com Thank you for meeting with me and City Manager Scott Neal on Tuesday, June 19, 2012. As you are aware, we are.very concerned about how the GrandView District framework could potentially negatively impact our Washburn - McReavy Edina Chapel, located at the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Highway 100. As it was stated in the City Council meeting, certain items of the framework "may or may not happen." We are extremely concerned about the potential of a road going through our property and negatively impacting either our funeral chapel and /or our parking facility. Where we have been told it is only a framework and we should not be overly concerned, a road on our property would be catastrophic to our family business. In our meeting we discussed the history of what is now our Edina Chapel. As you know, it is the former Cedric Adams restaurant site and was then occupied by various businesses for several decades. We purchased the facility on August 14, 1992, and invested well over $2 million to make what has become a well recognized and respected funeral chapel. The residents of Edina have embraced our Edina Chapel, and the high visibility, good access, and ample adjacent parking are contributing factors to the success of our Edina Chapel. The following are bullet points we discussed: • A unique business requires a unique facility; not easily relocated. • Quality construction, poured concrete structure and foundation in excellent condition. • Approximately 100 parking spaces are critical for visitations and services. • The elderly visit our chapel and need close proximity parking for easy access and safety. • Chapel requires large staging area of parking lot for forming funeral processions on -site. We will be forming processions and if we don't have a large enough parking lot, based upon the Alternative 1 (March 27) draft, we will have no option but to form the procession on Arcadia. Preparing a procession for departure can result in cars sitting idle, blocking a street for 10 to 15 minutes. This preparation is much easier and safer in our parking lot than a city street. "Over 150 years of distinctive funeral service" Family owned and operated since 1857 by the McReavy family Page 2 ■ Chapel requires separate entrance and exit for forming funeral processions and departures to cemeteries. • We have concerns that, should a road go through our parking lot, traffic could back up at the intersection of 50th Street due to cars slowing down to turn. • Edina Chapel is approximately 30 percent of our business and critically important to the survival of our fifth generation family business. • Interior chapel improvements begun, including drop down video projection screens and upgraded sound system, video and recording equipment. • Exterior chapel improvements scheduled for this fall, including lighting, landscaping and parking lot improvements to better serve the Edina community. • Approx. 700 at -need families have services every year through our Edina Chapel. • Thousands of preneed families have prepaid their services through the Edina Chapel, anticipating it will be there in the future at their time of need. Of these prepaid services, several million dollars are held in escrow earning interest to ensure services are paid in full at the time of death. The expectation is the Edina Chapel will be there as it is today with the existing facility and parking. We also discussed that there are a few unanticipated consequences due to the publicity of a potential road going through our property, of two competing funeral homes making comments to client families that they should not prepay services with our Edina Chapel as there is no guarantee the building will be standing in the future. We have also had client families express concern about preplanning or prepaying services with our Edina Chapel for the same fear that the facility may not exist or have ample parking in the future. We kindly request that the City of Edina recognize how critical this issue is to our family business and provide reassurance that a road will not be constructed or access points closed that will negatively impact our funeral chapel or parking facility. The City of Edina has been very good to Washburn- McReavy and the McReavy family, and we are very appreciative of that. We hope this positive relationship in serving our community continues for generations to come. Thank you. Sincerely, 4r William W. McReavy President June 29, 2012 Police Chief long 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN, 55424 Dear Chief Long: I am writing to share the details of a disappointing encounter with one of your officers. On Friday afternoon, July 21'`, my 17- year -old daughter was a passenger in a car accident*on Vernon Avenue. Thankfully,'no one was seriously injured. By the time I arrived, several emergency responders and police officers were on the scene. I obviously spent most of my time comforting my daughter, so do not know all the details of the accident or the immediate response. What I do know is that one of the officers on the scene seemed more intent on being hostile and argumentative than on being helpful. As an Edina resident.for more than two decades, I have seen the fine work of your officers on other occasions, so was shocked by this aberration.' Police officers, of course, are trained in how to calm a situation and how to work with the public. It appears that Officer Kapala is deficient in both skills. Perhaps she dislikes her job or she has issues with teenagers (including, in this case, honor students and sports captains at Edina High School). Whatever the reason for her approach, she is doing a disservice to the reputation of the Edina Police Department. We have raised our daughter to be respectful of law enforcement and to believe she can turn to police for help. It was disappointing for her to come away from this wondering if all officers truly do care about those they serve. I would be happy to discuss this with you if you need additional information. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Ann and Darren Merrill 3525 West 54th St. Edina, MN, 55410 cc: James Hovland r ... July 11, 2012 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 50"' St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor, In recent weeks I have corresponded with you and the City Council as well as Ms. Kingston on the topic of the Citizens United resolutions. Ms. Kingston has replied that they are working on this topic within the HRRC and could have a resolution prepared soon. The attached articles re- enforce the importance of addressing the Citizens United decision. I trust that this is recognized at the Council level that local elections could soon be influenced by outside money. An amendment to the US Constitution and campaign reform are very serious issues that must be resolved to restore some confidence in our elections. Since , f: Laird W. Beaver 5624 Melody Lake Drive , Edina, Minn. 55436 Attachments: California article about Citizens United Conference of Mayors resolution Citizens United: California Becomes Sixth State To Call For Amendment Against Ruling Page 1 of 2 Find a Job r for Jobs. s"•%Liu for Jobs. 1ltt z Job. Act .I ill\ h. 2012 LOS ANGELES ,;. t N LNX ,, 1,1., 1 LL Anna AlmendralaBeconie a fanannaa a(�huffington post. com Like . 282 Citizens United: California Becomes Sixth State To Call For Amendment Against Ruling Posted: 071052012 9:14 pm Updated: 07108/201211:39 am an official stand against Citizens unnea v. reaerm Election Commission, a 2010 Supreme Court ruling. One of the largest states in the nation took an official stand Thursday against the supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which ruled that government restriction of corporation or union spending on political campaigns violated the First Amendment right to free speech. California joins Hawaii, Vermont, Rhode Island, Maryland and New Mexico in calling for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court ruling. State assembly members Bob Wieckowski (D- Calif.) and Michael Allen (D- Calif.) introduced the campaign finance reform bill in January, calling for the federal government to send a constitutional amendment overturning Citizens United to all the states for ratification. The measure also would serve as an official symbol of California's disagreement with the ruling. In an email to The Huffington Post, Wieckowski emphasized California's status as a trendsetter in the fight for campaign finance reform. "A lot of national movements and trends start in California," wrote Wieckowski. "We have the largest population, the most congressional representatives and the largest economy in the country. It was critical for California to take a stand." The last constitutional amendment was ratified in 1992. When asked about the quixotic nature of his resolution, Wieckowski agreed that the fight for campaign finance reform was a challenge. "No one is underestimating how difficult it is, and justifiably so, to amend the Constitution," said Wieckowski. "But being silent is worse. Failing to speak out, to organize, to hold rallies and to take action would be much worse. 'Thais how you bring about change in this country. By going to city hall, the state Capitol and making your voice heard and shining a light on the Issue." The moment Citizens United was first decided in 2010, Mary Zhu, a retired physician from Davis, Calif., joined other local activists to make phone calls, write letters and sign petitions against the ruling under the organizing umbrella of the non -profit Public Citizen. Together with Occupy Davis, Zhu and her friends were able to push the Davis City Council to endorse Wieckowski's bill in February. Now that she's part of a successful statewide effort, to condemn Citizens United, Zhu has no doubt that grassroots activism nationwide will eventually overturn the ruling. "California is big and powerful, and this resolution will give tremendous encouragement to other groups, Zhu said to The Huffington Post. "It's like a stone that gets thrown in the pond; the water ripples far and wide." When asked about bipartisan acceptance of large donations in the post-Citizens era, Zhu was realistic about how both Republican and Democratic candidates benefited. "It's the game, and they're stuck in it. I can understand why Obama has to go along with it - -'You don't bring a knife to a gunfight'," Zhu said. But to Zhu, the politicians' conundrum also underscored the importance of her work as a private citizen. "We citizens, who have nothing to gain and everything to lose -- it's our job to start screaming loud and clear. This resolution is just the beginning." Organizations such as Public Citizen, Common Cause, CREDO Mobile, Free Speech for People and the California League of Conservation Voters all advocated for passage of the resolution in the California legislature. Public Citizen circulated a petition signed by more than 50,000 from California, and it has advocated for similar resolutions in states such as Vermont and Maryland. httn: / /www.hiifFiingtonnogt.com/ 2012 /07/05 /citizens- united- califomia n 1652684.htm1?vie... 7/6/2012 80th Annual Meeting Adopted Resolutions Page 1 of 1 ESTABLISH AS A POSITION OF THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS THAT CORPORATIONS SHOULD NOT RECEIVE THE SAME LEGAL RIGHTS AS NATURAL PERSONS DO, THAT MONEY IS NOT SPEECH AND THAT INDEPENDENT XPENDI URES SHOD BE RE GULATED WHEREAS, the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights are Intended to protect the rights of Individual human beings also known as "natural persons "; and WHEREAS, corporations can and do make Important contributions to our society, but the United States Conference of Mayors does not consider them natural persons; and WHEREAS, the right to free speech Is a fundamental freedom and unalienable right and free and fair elections are essential to democracy and effective self - governance; and WHEREAS, United States Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black in a 1938 opinion stated, "I do not believe the word 'person' In the Fourteenth Amendment includes corporations"; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court held in Buckley v. Valeo (1976) that the appearance of corruption justified limits on contribution to field candidates, and ensuring jh at all citizens, regardless of wealth, have United States opportunity to Conference of Mayors finds political iews heard;nanduch as creating a level playing WHEREAS, �n of corruption rationale Supreme as only Court In B cide direct contributions tones Independent an expenditures because it found that the corruption or WHEREAS, United States Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens observed In Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC (2000) that "money Is property, it is not speech, "; and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court recognized In Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) the threat to a republican form of government posed by "the corrosive and distorting effects of Immense aggregations of wealth that are accumulated with the help of the corporate form and that have little or no correlation to the public's support for the corporations political Ideas" and upheld limits on Independent expenditures by corporations; and . United v. The WHEREAS, limited United corporate spend ng t Court In Citizetions, candidate selection, Election policy declsloin d sway votes and a decision In Austin, WHEREAS, prior to Citizens United decision unlimited Independent campaign expenditures could be made by Individuals and associations, hough such committees operated under federal contribution limits; and, WHEREAS, given that the Citizens United decision "rejected the argument that political speech of corporations or other associations should be treated need t differently" b broaden the corruption on atio ale for campaign financehreform to facilitate regulation of Independent expenditures regardless of the Is source of the money for this spending, for or against a candidate; and WHEREAS, a February 2010 Washington Post -ABC News pal found that 80 percent of Americans oppose the U.S. Supreme Court Citizens United ruling; and, WHEREAS, s such as limited) ability, perpetual Justices In Citizens favorable treatment of the accumulation ccumu ation and distribution) of assets; t enjoyed by natural shareholders corporations are persons balance to put profits self-interest and broader public intent whenhmak making political decisions and individual for shareholders ahead of concerns for WHEREAS, addressing both the Citizens United decision, and corporate personhood Is necessary; and have referred the Issue of corporate personhood to WHEREAS, the City Councils of Missoula, Montana; Boulder, Colorado; and Madison, Wisconsin their communities for advisory vote. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that It Is the position of the United States Conference of Mayors that corporations should not receive the same legal rights as Individual human beings (also known as "natural persons ") do; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the United States Conference of Mayors also determines that the most urgent action needed is to reverse the impacts of by corporations e that contributes t the undermining iiImpacts hat'corpoate personhood" has on unlimited fair elections and effective self- governance; ditures and so rT aFl League oRE RESOLVED to join with us in this States by (passing similar Resolutions.ther communities and jurisdictions and organizations like RESOLUTION ADOPTED JUNE 2022 I,.. Conference /metro R.acn 7/3/2012 SOUTHWEST TRANSIT 1500 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 - 949 -2BUS • www.swtransit.org June 28, 2012 William Hargis, Chair Transportation Advisory Board 390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Chair Hargis, The purpose of this letter is to request that the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reconsider its recent action related to the CMAQ grant awards, and revisit the recommendation from its advisory committees (TAB Funding and Programming, Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC), and the CMAQ Scoring Committee) that recommended CMAQ funding for project CMT -11 -07 SouthWest Transit's (SWT) TH 169 & Pioneer Trail Park and Ride. It is SWT's understanding that at the June 20th TAB meeting, SWT's CMAQ application was removed from consideration after concerns were voiced that SWT's project would overlap the CMAQ project request put forth by the City of Shakopee, that the point differential between SWT's and the next highest ranked project was too great, and because of uncertainty surrounding the funding of operations from the proposed P & R facility. Each will be described further below. Overlapping Service - The analysis put forth in SWT's application showed a relatively small number of users coming from Shakopee's closest Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) to SWT's proposed facility. The analysis showed 78 out of a total of 309 users coming from Shakopee by 2020, and 110 out of a total of 391 users coming from Shakopee by 2030. Given that SWT's project proposal was only for a 300 -stall facility, even without any projected users from Shakopee, the facility would be at 94% capacity by 2030; demonstrating a clear future demand for the facility just from Eden Prairie and Bloomington alone. Today, SWT has a higher number of Shakopee residents utilizing our current facilities in Eden Prairie than what was put forth in the application. It should also be noted that this analysis was completed using the Metropolitan Council's Demand Estimation Methodology and was reviewed by both Metro Transit and City of Shakopee staff prior to being submitted. Point Differential — The justification to remove SWT's proposed project from consideration based on its evaluation score relative to the next highest project score creates a number of issues that need to be further reviewed. The fact that the advisory committees recommended.the project for approval in two different recommendations demonstrates that the project has merit. While there is a seemingly large � � ^ ' point differential b - ` nS&T's proposed project and the next highest ra nked project, " ', n t ater than between Project #1 and Project #2i the transit category. differential \m really nogre ` ^ -ride lot the area be /n& p. r~ 000sed �..�., and � A nderso nLakes TodaySWThosa s—aU/SO�aUpark'and — Road). Because of the lot size limitations and our agreement with the prope1: rty owner (Preserve pom� our ope ratkons tor'~"°�e`adenu~.- sen�-_ to this oreato Shopping Center), »e are not ob�toen meet current os well a is projected d-e—n— and . ` ornise-because it ' red toward nd' the densely fits nnorerefh�edn�ha This project ~also --^'`' ' o populated area of southeasrcrn Eden pra��\an area thathas d�ers�ednixesofhusing'typesano income leveb\. ' ` ` The bot1on line is that this project would provide transit opt �ns for a corhdorthatbunderseNedin ' the sout hwestern area of our metropolitan region. Fun ding — of =��^~~~ - �VVTsCKA�oppica1mn was /u/ a ceo�a|project ' and funds to run operations from this facility was hot overlooked but omitted from the application bydesign SN T Transit has o long history of building successful pa rkand ride facilities. our past practices have always been that if~' facility cannotbesuoportedfron.doyonexithinacurren t orpnU ectedoperating/ budget, would �thinthere�io sbestinterest1oappkrCKHA[�fundstovvanUtUe thenx«edonotfee\it»«ou e»«| " ` construction of any facility. Because SNT chooses to approach CKAQfunUl n� p�'e d^s^i,n this manner, vvedo not believe vxe should be penalized ' foran approach xxe see asbeing fiscally prudent. � theTAB G�enthe reasoning and lnfonmo�onput fo�hinth��tte�| respectfully request th"` _ reconsider its position as soon aspo ssi.o |e . SVT *`".vou|dbeheppytoaddresstheTABwithany questions or concerns it may have Thank . for your thoughtful consideration of this request. + Sincerely, ' '. / Na 'air, 5o Transit Commission M ofEd P ' Mayor, Cy en i�e ra � co Susan Haigh, Chair, Metropolitan Council Gary Van 6l[ Metropolitan Council ]enniferMuMt, Metropolitan Cound| Steve Elkins, Metropolitan Council Randy Maluchnik, TAB Mennber — [arverCounty Jan Callison, TAB Member — Hd.nn6pin County p Jon Ulrich, TAB Member — Scott County Aamels.Hovland, TAB Member —,Edina Thomas Heffelfinger, TAB Member —District B Bethany Tjornhom, TAB Member — Chanhassen Aaron Isaacs, TAB' Member — Transit David Van Hattum, TAB Member -'Transit Len Simich, SWT CEO O-, e m •,�cO es °a �£9� REPO RURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. A. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK ❑ Discussion x Information Date: JULY 17, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is correspondence received after the packets were delivered to you. July 16, 2012 Via e -mail to: mail ;c LdinaMN.gov Mayor James Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council The City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor James Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council: My name is Tim O'Brien. I am a 39 -year resident of Edina and am host of Democratic Visions, a local cable access program which has been aired in its present format on public access television for going on four years. i write to state my opposition to the request of Comcast that it be allowed to eliminate the Eden Prairie public access studio as a part of its franchise renewal agreement. Democratic Visions, primarily an interview program, is well known in Democratic circles in the southwest suburbs and elsewhere and has hosted a wide variety of political guests, including U.S. Senator Al Franken, Governor Mark Dayton, U.S. Representative Keith Ellison, County Attorney Mike Freeman, among many others. Democratic Visions.does not confine itself to discussions with politicians and has, on a frequent basis, hosted other community leaders, as well as representatives of public interest groups, in order to provide them with a. forum for their views and ideas. I am aware that proponents of the elimination of the Eden Prairie public access,studio assert that present day technology is such that programs which are produced at the Eden Prairie public access studio could, if the studio was to close, be produced "at home" through the use of personal computers. I respectfully disagree and suggest, to the contrary, that the very existence of community based shows such as Democratic Visions would be threatened and Democratic Visions, even if it were to survive, would find its caliber diminished as a consequence of inability to attract guests to a home location. Moreover, the quality of the program would certainly be significantly compromised if the opportunity was lost to utilize a professional' studio. It is my understanding that the cable television franchise entered into by the City of Edina and presently held by Comcast extends back some 15 years. It is my further understanding that the issuance of the original franchise was premised, in part, upon the promise to provide community based programming. In my estimation, elimination of the Eden Prairie public access studio would constitute a major- disservice to the citizens of Edina. Very truly yours, Tim O'Brien 4512 Bruce Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Susan Howl as Subject: Edinborough Park This week the city council will be voting on Edinborough Park's renovations and you are directly involved.. As you are well aware, I am one of the strongest advocates of NOT destroying one of the Parks in Edina that draw people to want to live in Edina. That park being Edinborough. Your idea to destroy the Park as the residents know it based on some flawed consultants report (twice mind you) who had /has no interest in the City of Edina's welfare and based their report on "bad" numbers from the get go to destroy the pool and running track and the ability to have productions like music on Sunday and Wednesday night is extremely poor judgement. Edinbourgh Park IS TO REMAIN FOR THE ENJOYMENT OF THE RESIDENTS OF EDINA. VOTE AT THE CITY COUNCIL TO PLACE INTO EFFECT THE REMODELING RECOMMENDATIONS OF JOHN KATTREH AND THE EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT - - - -IN ORDER WORDS VOTE YES ON THIS SUBJECT. I am happy to have read and to hear that the Edina Park and Recreation Department "tubed" one of their own proposals and adopted their own positive proposal of a remodeling plan to upgrade Edinborough's pool facilities and this proposal is to be in the City councils hands this week for approval. It is my hope YOU WILL APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND SAVE EDINBOROUGH PARK FROM DESTRUCTION. Having said the above and hope you will not disappoint all the people of Edina I list below reasons and suggestions why it is important to save Edinbourgh and do the recommended Park Board Proposals that are positive for the community and for you to vote YES on going thru with the saving of Edinbourgh Park. Some one finally got the idea that the Park needs to be marketed and that brought the Edina Swim Club into the picture and reported $50,000 added revenue. More needs to be done on the marketing angle to get more revenue producing events in the Park. The fact that John Keprois says that reducing horticultural maintenance ($80,000) and lighting ($40,000) can save $120,000 is a good thing by removing some plants and upgrade the lighting. I know that lighting bit works because tons of money has been saved in our Condo Association. If the idea can include the art walk that would be excellent because in winter this is another place for residents to go and also more revenue should 5 -6 arts shows be promoted and admission charged and up to 15% of the proceeds from sales be given to the park for upkeep. You say the Park generates a $400,000 loss. Well now these three items just make the loss $230,000. And do not tell me that everything the city of Edina does makes a profit or breaks even. No government unit ever does that in my opinion! this $230,000 can be cut farther I know for sure. The washroom and dressing rooms upgrades for both mens and women is a good idea because it would make it a first class place and maybe it is time to do such a thing since this week you ARE going to save Edinbourgh Park by voting yes to remodeling and not destroying. What happened to wedding and reception parties being held at Edinbourgh Park? I understand that brought in a lot of money. To say you eliminated this in favor of the "kids" is bad thinking in my opinion. One weekend a month, at least, should be scheduled for this type of revenue generation. Set a minimum and if the minimum is not met then open it to the kids -- -think outside the box. You just build that "cafe" in the park. In winter it should be open when concerts are being played on Wednesday and Sundays nights. Yes the Park closes at 6PM in Winter on sunday. Why 6PM when the concerts end at 8PM- -that place should be open until the concerts are over to generate money - - -In summer you kept Centennial Lakes popcorn and drink place open until the concerts are over (813M) and you have two people working there at one time. If you cannot get people to work two additional hours get volunteers to do it and you can put me on that list. You cannot believe how many bring their own dinner and the McDonalds, burger king bags are there - - -you get the word out and people will buy at Edinbourgh because it eliminates work at home and a stop before they get to Edinbourgh. I know a large of money comes from the associations surrounding Edinbourgh Park because that is how it is set up and how it has, I think, been running for years. I live in one of those Condos and I GLADLY pay my fee. and everyone else does not mind also. That is part of our condo fee and we accept it. Yes there is a provision I understand to eliminate this fee in a couple of years. Hey - - -get to the property managers of the affected Condos and tell them to continue the Park fee in the Condo fee - - -No one is going to move "out of their home" because of a continued park fee. there should be no fear of losing revenue from this revenue stream. Just have the Park fee continued - -- Simple -- Right? We can get more swim,clubs to rent time. We could sponsor events at the pool to generate money. could go on but the main thing is that you must vote to SAVE EDINBOURGH and put into action the recommends of John Keprois and the Edina Park and REcreation Department without fail. Vote yes to the remodeling to save Edinborough . Thank you for reading and listening to the residents of Edina. John D. Alt 7602 YORK AVENUE SOUTH #125 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 cell pone - -- 612 - 239 -8179 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 8:22 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Tue night Council Meeting Attachments: IRIS BERGREN SITUATION.pptx ''`�'',:. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 yr : Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Please make note of my new email address. We're a do.to n ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Bergren, Kathy [ mai Ito: Kathy. Berg ren0)hanesbrands.com] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 7:41 AM To: Edina Mail; ionibennettl2Cabcomcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague(a)edinarealty.com; swensonann1 cagmail.com Cc: 'scottal69 @hotmail.com' Subject: Tue night Council Meeting Good Morning! I am writing on behalf of my Mother who lives at 5844 Brookview Ave So (house facing Pamela Park). She has an issue that was created when her street was recently curbed /repaved that we would like to address during Tuesday night's Council Meeting (7/17). Since we only have 3 minutes to present the case, I thought it would be helpful to send you a brief synopsis of the situation (attached). If anyone has any questions prior to Tuesday evening, please feel free to contact me. I will look forward to meeting you! Sincerely, Katherine Bergren This transmission is intended only for use by the intended�recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient you should not read; disclose:. copy, circulate or in any other way use the information contained in this transmission. The information contained in this transmission may be confidential arid/or privileged. if you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this transmission inCluding any attachments To: Edina City Council From: Iris Bergren, 5844 Brookview Ave So, 952.927.8947 Re: Damage to the sewer pipes under the street CURRENT SITUATION: • Mrs.. Bergren has lived at above address for approximately 50 years with no water /sewer issues until recently • In 2010, the city curbed and paved the block which all homeowners were required to pay. Mrs Bergren's portion was approximately $6,000 • During this project, heavy machinery was used to excavate, grade, and tamp the road.. • Over the course of many weeks, multiple huge machines were usually parked on the side easment of 5844 and the front easment of 5842 • Shortly after this project was completed, the pipes in Mrs.. Bergren's basement began periodically backing up • -In May of 2012, Mrs Bergren experienced another back -up in her basement drain and called a plumber who took pictures of the pipes and told her that the break was definitely out in the street and indicated that the pipes may have been compromised because of the heavy equipment which parked on her property • The DVD was given to an Edina City Engineer who said it was Mrs Bergren's responsibility • As she began talking about this with her neighbor at 5842, he also indicated that he began having similar issues with his pipes backing up right after the street was completed . However, because a new home was constructed next to his house, the city had the developer fix the pipe and pave the road. Mrs Bergren was told that she would not only have to pay for the pipe to be repaired at an estimated cost of $3,500 but because it is within a 5-year window, she would also be responsible for a more extensive repavement (vs a patch) at an additional cost of $5,600. Total estimated cost to Mrs Bergren who is living on a fixed income would be $10,100 • Given the similar situation at 5842 as well as the opinion of her plumber, Mrs Bergren now believes that'the heavy equipment on her property caused the problem and that the City of Edina should assume all costs to repair the pipe and repave the street WHY SHOULD THE CITY OF EDINA ASSUME THE COSTS TO REPAIR THE PIPE UNDER THE STREET AND REPAVE? • It is not coincidental that both 5844 and 5842 had the same problem immediately following the street renovation • The break in the pipe is under the street, not on her property • Mrs Bergren and her neighbors were never informed that if pipes needed to be repaired within 5 years, the individual homeowner would be responsible for extensive street repairs • She has been told that letters sent out now, do inform homeowners of this "requirement" • There are patches that have been completed on Fairfax and St Johns where streets were paved in 2009 • Taxes paid within a city are a form of protecting its citizens from individual financial hardships such as what Mrs Bergren is experiencing. Mrs. Bergren and others pay taxes for many other things (such as schools and parks) even though they may not personally use them. Mrs Bergren's situation was caused by a city initiative and the City of Edina should pay for the repairs so she, as one citizen, does not have to incur this expense alone A Call for Help Page 1 of 2 AV 601S KEY 111MI June 14, 2012 A Call for Help - As you have likely heard, a devastating fire on Tuesday, July 10 negatively impacted members of our Edina Public Schools community. The fire broke out around 11:20 p.m. at the Parklawn Estates in the southern part of Edina. Fifteen units were affected, with three apartments identified as a total loss, and three others experiencing significant smoke and water damage. (Read more about the fire her ) Fortunately, there have been no reports of significant injuries. Some residents have been relocated to other vacant units in the building, while others are seeking alternative housing. On Friday morning, members of EPS met with Parklawn management representatives to discuss how the District, in partnership with the City and local service organizations, can support the victims of the fire. While specific needs are still being assessed, we know that the needs will most certainly extend beyond the residents of the 15 units directly impacted, as many occupants are already at work cleaning clothes and furnishings in an effort to rid them of the strong smell of smoke. We hope to have more specific information to share with you next week about how you can help and what in -kind donations are most needed. In the meantime, interested Edina Schools community members can make monetary donations, made payable to the Parklawn Resident Relief Fund, at any U.S. Bank location. We also ask that you keep the residents of Parklawn in your thoughts as they work through this difficult situation. Regards, Susan Brott Director of Communications & Community Engagement Edina Public Schools 952 - 848 -4066 (office) / 651 - 245 -52.53 (cell) susbrott(cDedina.k12.mn.us Edina Public Schools 5701 Normandale Rd. http: / /campaign.r20. constantcontact. com/ render ?l lr= x9vrkgcab &v= 001017_,... 7/16/2012 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 3:37 PM "o: John Keprios c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Hornet's Nest Design Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ellen Jones 2 [mailto:ellen.iones @mac.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 3:17 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Hornet's Nest Design Dear City Council Members: I understand that the City Council may be taking action on the Hornet's Nest proposal at this evening's Council meeting. As a member of both the Sports Dome and Hornet's Nest committees, I recognize the importance of proper planning for these facilities. I'd like to bring to your attention the fact that there is a potential for a Sports Dome to be located adjacent to the Braemar arena, possibly adjacent to the Hornet's Nest. Such a site becomes more attractive if the Hornet's Nest is designed to take advantage of potential operational synergies and construction savings when designed 1 conjunction with the Sports Dome. I want to make sure that actions involving the Hornet's Nest won't eliminate possibilities for the optimal siting of the Sports Dome. Sincerely, Ellen Jones MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thurs., May 10, 2012 7:14 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:14p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Members Gubrud, Heer, Jennings, Kostuch, Latham, Rudnicki, Thompson, Zarrin and Chair Sierks Absent: Gupta, Paterlini, and Risser Absent Staff: Interim Karen Kurt Staff Present: Rebecca Foster and Solvei Wilmot III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Kostuch to approve the Agenda as written. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Change the July 4th Parade minutes to, Hoping to have a Tolby mascot. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Consent Agenda per the edits discussed for the April EEC Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Darrell Hoekstra, Waste Management John O'Neal, Allied Waste VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Board and Commission survey results. Joel Stegner presented the survey results to the Commissioners. B. Recycling & Solid Waste WG 1. Residential Recycling RFP. Discussion was held regarding the lack of an objective environmental metric to produce a more substantive evaluation for the weighing of the proposals. Concern was expressed about seeking additional weighing information from the proposers after the proposals had been opened. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Kostuch to 1. Negotiate with the top two proposers. 2. The City request that the top two proposers provide additional information concerning the following metrics, and that the City evaluation team should use this additional information in scoring the environmental criterion in the RFP: 1' a. What energy sources (e.g., gasoline, electricity, natural gas, diesel, biodiesel, other fuels, etc.) does the proposer use at each stage of the collection, transfer and processing of their recycling enterprise? b. Submit documentation of the fuel efficiency of the proposer's fleet. 3. City Council members should tour top two proposers' facilities. 4. The top two proposers should submit a Syr bid in addition to their 7yr bid. Discussion was held regarding the problem of the best value ranking, which resulted in the best environmental scorer not offering the best economic package. Members expressed concern that a more quantitative metric should be developed to evaluate the environmental category. Members expressed concern about reevaluating the proposals since they have already been evaluated and a ranking has been established. Members expressed concern about the seven year length of the contract and why a shorter time wasn't offered. Ms. Wilmot commented that the proposals had been reviewed and the best value proposal was the seven year length. Members discussed a five year contract but recognized the shorter contract may increase the cost of the contract. Commissioner Rudnicki recommended matrix 2a above. Commissioner Zarrin recommended matric2b above. Commissioner Latham recommended that the City Council members tour the Material Recycling Facility (MRF) of both the top two proposers given that with two top proposers there is at least a 50% chance that the contract will change vendors. Commissioner Heer recommended that the top two proposers be negotiated with, not just the top proposer. General concern was expressed with the fact that there were no commissioners on the Recycling RFP review team. This is a continuing EEC concern given that there were no commissioners on the solar panel RFP review team. Motion carried unanimously. Motion made by Commissioner Rudnick!, seconded by Commissioner Thompson that in addition to the two metrics identified in the previous motion, the city should request proposers to provide information on this additional metric, with the City considering this information in evaluating the proposers' score under the environmental criteria of the RFP: how much energy is used to handle one ton of material in each step of the process. The top two proposers would be expected to include, but not limited to, fuel used to collect and /or transfer one ton of material; electricity in the processing stage to handle one ton of material (this is the energy needed to run conveyor belts, fans, blowers, climate control, etc); and energy (e.g., diesel, natural gas) to operate transfer equipment like loaders, etc. Discussion — Commissioners Heer and Kostuch believed that this metric could only be validated if the proposers also documented the assumptions upon which the data was gathered, and could involve considerable effort to gather. Commissioner Latham was concerned that this could extend the time frame to arrive at a decision. Commissioner Rudnicki assured the commission that vendors had routine knowledge of this data in the operation of their plants and that it would not be difficult for proposers to gather. Commissioner Sierks acknowledged that he did not know if this data were difficult to gather or not but believed that it would be It worth the effort to try to obtain in order to quantify the environmental criterion of the RFP. Ms. Wilmot expressed concern about how to gather the data. Roll Call was taken: Ayes: Gubrud, Rudnick!, Thompson, Zarrin, and 'Chair Slerks Nays: Heer, Kostuch, Latham, Absent: Paterlini and Risser C. Air and Water Quality 1. .Mayors' letter to support Clean Air Act legislation Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Gubrud to recommend Mayor Hovland to sign the Clean Air Act letter. Member Kostuch voted Nay. Motion carried. D. Energy WG. Member Heer and Chair Sierks meet with Karen Kurt and Scott Neal to discuss the focus of the EEC. It was suggested that the Commission use the Green Steps City and EEEP as a framework for their work plan. As the Commission and City implement new items they should try to follow up on them. 1. Environmental Initiatives Awards Finalist. Mayor Hovland & City Manager Scott Neal will be attending the event. 2. Mayor's Climate Protection Award filed. Chair Sierks applied for the grant. E. Education Outreach WG 1. April 19 2012 educational program. The speaker was outstanding. The discussion groups at the end weren't very engaging. The Vendors were great. The most common comment stated was people were going to eat less meat. All comments from the Dialogue will be posted on the City website. 2. May Term Intern projects. This topic was tabled. 3. 4th of July parade unit. This topic was tabled. 4. Picnic. Weber Park on Friday, May 11th from 5:30- 8:30pm for all Commissioners and Working Group members. F. Green Step Cities Review. Review and comment for next meeting. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS. No Comments. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS. No Comments. IX. STAFF COMMENTS. A. Staff will track submission of working group minutes UPCOMING EVENTS AND MEETINGS 6 -14 -12 EEC June Meeting in Community Room There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 9:20p.m. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Gubrud to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfull ted, Rebe ost r GIS Administrator i MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM MAY 17, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Schweiger, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made bwmember Thompson and seconded by member Braden approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETINGOF APRIL 19, 2012 COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of May 2. 2012 Member LaForce asked how often the ETC receives TSC reports and what to do they with the reports. Director Houle explained that the TSC is a staff committee that meets monthly. He said staff receives requests from residents, collects data, does analysis and reports findings to the TSC and the requests are reviewed and approved or denied based on policy. Residents are sometimes surveyed for their input. He said requests usually decrease during the winter months. He said staff is working on a new website that will include an interactive map showing requests from residents. Page 6, Section D, Item 8: Member Janovy asked if this could be referred to the Planning Commission since it seems to come up often. Director Houle said they could make a recommendation to Council to forward it on to the Planning Commission and he could also,talk with Planning Director Teague. Page 3, Section B, Item 1: Member Whited said she walks this area frequently and it appears that the issue is more extreme at nights and staff's observation is in the daytime. She recommended that staff review this request in 90 days to see if the intersection qualifies for a 4 -way stop sign because she concurred .that the intersection was not safe. Director Houle said.a stop sign will not provide extra safety. Member Whited suggested a sidewalk or no parking on one side of 56th. Director Houle said staff could survey residents to get their feedback on a sidewalk or no parking on one side. A hedge was also noted as a possible safety hazard. Staff will look at the hedge, parking and speed data, and report back on these. Page 1, Section A, Item 1: Director Houle was asked about the street width for parking on both sides. He said the width is 27 -ft without marked lanes and 36 -ft for a marked 2 -1ane road. Director Houle was asked what Section D was and he explained that it was a list of other calls that staff received and residents were satisfied and therefore the issues were not advanced to the TSC. peed Table Policy: Director Houle said during the W. 44th Street reconstruction, traffic was unintentionally pushed to Sunnyside Road (despite the marked detour route) and with 85% speeds up to 36 mph prior to construction, Council L approved a speed table for temporary use during construction. Director Houle said approval of this policy would allow staff to purchase more speed tables to be used in conjunction with street reconstruction projects, except on Municipal State Aid streets because traffic calming is not allowed on these streets. After discussion the following changes were recommended: Process: the city engineer to decide when and where to place speed tables; Item 4: remove 'speed of 5 to 10 mph' and reword to say 'over speed limit;' change 'adjacent' to 'nearby' or 'close.' • Item 6: delete and incorporate into #2. At the end of what was Item 6 add 'the priority for installation should be on a first requested basis.' Motion was made by member Janovy to recommend the following actions regarding items in the TSC report: • Section A.2,: Policy 4: remove'S to 10 mph' and add 'over speed limit; eliminate Policy 6 and incorporate into Policy 2 and add 'the priority for installation should be on a first requested basis;' city engineer to decide when and where to place speed tables; and bring back to ETC for review. • Section B.1.: Explore option of no parking on one side of street; see if hedge is a safety hazard; • Section D.B. Refer to Planning Commission to look at parking requirements. The motion was seconded by member LaForce. All voted aye. Motion carried. Proposed Enhanced Crosswalk for Tracy Avenue Project Director Houle said staff is opening bids next Tuesday for this project. He said the Intersection at Tracy and Benton is staying as is and the ETC recommended an enhanced crosswalk. He said the plan is to install a 10 ft. (12 ft total width from edge to edge) stamped crosswalk that is pounded into the pavement. He explained that the design will be more visible because the design and color makes it pops out at you. He said the initial cost is more expensive than traditional crosswalks; however, there is no annual maintenance like painted crosswalk that has to be painted twice annually. He said the crosswalk on 50th next to City Hall is very similar and after seven years and it is just now showing wear. Other areas where similar design is used are 70th & Metro, and 44th & Wooddale. Director Houle was asked if the same crosswalk could be installed at Creek Valley and he said yes. Member Bass suggested creating a policy to make this standard treatment near schools if it works well. Director Houle agreed and said the intersections near schools would have the major crosswalk and a tiered system as you move away from the schools. Chair Nelson asked about a crosswalk on Vernon toward Highland School and Director Houle said Hennepin County does favor crosswalks where traffic signals are installed but he could explore this further with the County. Member Franzen asked staff to report back on the overall cost after bids are open. After discussion, the ETC recommended installation of the crosswalk. Updates Student Member - No update. Bike Edina Task Force — Minutes of April 12, 2012 — No update. Grandview Small Area Study Director Houle said he asked Director Teague if there is anything that the ETC could be doing in the meantime and he is going to check with the committee. Director Houle said he has some ideas for federal funding. Living Streets Working Group Update Chair Thompson said he spoke with BARR, the consultant who is developing the Living Streets Policy and they are working on the deliverables. He said they have driven the streets to get a sense of the system to develop four street • /3 templates and he would like to schedule a working group meeting before this is completed. He said BARR would like to make a formal presentation at the June meeting. Member Bass offered the do.Town staff to meet with the working roup to help with public engagement. Member Thompson said Robin from Bloomington Health will be invited to the .iext working group meeting. Director Houle will schedule the next working group meeting. Transportation Options Working Group Co -chair Whited said they had a presentation from ITNAmerica that she will forward to everyone. She said she will be giving a presentation on Prism at the next meeting, the company she works for. Member Thompson motioned to add new member Greg Colborn from Normandale Lutheran Church, to the working group and the motion was seconded by member lyer. All voted aye.. Motion carried. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Janovy expressed dissatisfaction with staff's report to Council because it did not include comments from the ETC regarding the TLC Bike Blvd and the urban planner for the France Avenue Pedestrian Crossings. She said while the draft minutes were included, use of an advisory communication might be necessary to express the ETC desires. After discussion, the consensus was that use of advisories would be determined on a case by case basis. Member Whited followed up with Director Houle about expansion of bike lane on W. 58th St. Director Houle will have information for the next meeting. Chair Nelson expressed concerns about the increased amount of trains on the track. Director Houle said Canadian Pacific (CP) switched operation time due to a crew change which has resulted in more trains in the evenings. He said it is emporary but CP did not provide an end date. Chair Nelson said they are improving the track and wondered if this was to enable them to travel at higher speeds and if so, would they be required to install crossing arms. Director Houle" said he will look into this and report back. Member lyer said he has received comments from residents about the bike path over TH -62 and they've expressed concerns that it is not a workable solution and should be a real bridge. Director Houle said the plan is for a real bridge that will accommodate ADA when funding becomes available. STAFF COMMENTS TLC Bike Boulevard Update Director Houle said the City Council approved the plan with the following exception: W. 54th from Minnehaha Blvd to France Avenue will be advisory lane with parking on both sides; bump -outs were added on Wooddale Avenue at the intersection in the parking bay area; on- street markings south of Valley View Road down to W. 70th; and enhancement of the U- channel on the pedestrian bridge.' Gallagher Drive & Three Rivers Trail Director Houle said the plan was approved, including conduits and bus pads. France Avenue Pedestrian Crossines Director Houle said stakeholders meeting are scheduled for May 31, 7 p.m. (first meeting to explain the project and solicit feedback); June 26, (6 -7 p.m. ETC meeting, and 7 -9 p.m. for stakeholders meeting); July 9 (with the ETC to recommend approval to Council); and the public hearing on July 17. lotion was made by member Janovy approving the 3 special meetings and the motion was seconded by member Bass. All voted aye. Motion carried. 3 ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet TRANSPORTATION C MISSION NAME TERM I J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. I Attendance Meetings/work Sessions ............ 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 66 . ........ Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 411712012 n r (enter date) ) ... 6 100% Braden, Ann 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Franzen, Nathan 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% lyer, Surya 2/1/2015 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 120% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 117% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 120% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 117% Schweiger, Steven student 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Thompson, Michael 2/1/2013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 117% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 120% VACANT student 0 0% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meetinq Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type 1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: r MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thurs.,'June 14, 2012 7:03 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:03 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Members Gubrud, Heer, Jennings, Kostuch, Latham, Risser, Rudnicki, and Chair Sierks Absent: Gupta, Thompson, and. Zarrin Staff Present: Ross Bintner, KarenXurt, and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA. Member Latham requested the Edina Go Green Letter and Chair and Commission Member Comments Agenda Items to occur after the Recycling & Solid Waste WG Item due to her leaving the meeting early. Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Latham to approve the amended Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Rudnicki to approve the May Minutes per the edits discussed. Motion carried unanimously. B. Attendance report and revised roster. No Report. C. Working Group membership roster. Remove David B VanDongen from the temporarily deactivated Air Quality Working Group to the Water Quality Working Group. Laura Eaton resigned from the Education & Outreach Working Group. Commissioners thanked her for her outstanding job and service. D. EEC annual activity calendar. Member Latham will incorporate redline changes that were discussed. E. Work group minutes tracking sheet. Members gave an update on the status of their minutes. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Germana Paterlini has missed three consecutive meetings and has been deemed to have resigned from the Commission per city code. Ms Kurt introduced Ross Bintner as the new Environmental Engineer and EEC staff liaison. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Recycling & Solid Waste WG 1'. Residential recycling RFP update. The City Council approved staff to enter into contract negotiations with "best value" proposal for Residential Curbside Recycling. Member Latham would like to start creating an environmental metric and work with Hennepin County and review what other City's have done before the next bidding process begins. B. Air and Water Quality WG. Member Risser gave an update on the revision of the Drive Through Ordinance. The Working Group revised the decision to let PCD1 zoning district to have Drive Throughs. Member Risser gave an update on the MS4 annual meeting. 1. Mayors' letter to support Clean Air Act legislation. The letter was sent. C. Energy WG 1. Environmental Initiatives Awards winners. The City won awards for PACE and Green Step Cities. Member Heer thanked Chair Sierks for his involvement with submitting the applications. D. Education Outreach WG I. May Term Intern projects. Member Jennings visited five elementary schools and taught them how to turn off lights, recycle, compost, etc. She discovered she was reinforcing what the children already knew. 2. 4th of July parade unit. Member Gubrud said the Home Energy Squad will be in the parade and Tolby tattoos and switch plates will be handed out. E. Green Step Cities Review. Chair Sierks reviewed the Green Step Cities the city has certified and discussed what's completed and who will be maintaining the data if it's ongoing. Step 1.1 —The Property Manager will maintain the data entry. Step 1.2 — McKinstry will report to city on energy savings and then have City staff create a RFP to have a consultant do an investment grade audit. Step 1.7 - Completed no follow up needed. Step 2.1— Expand PACE to residential. Step 2.5 —The watering ordinance needs to be monitored better. Possibly install "smart water meters" in the future that knows the watering bans. Step 6.1— Completed no follow up needed. Step 6.2 — Need to edit city ordinances that conflict with Comp Plan. Step 8.1— Completed no follow up needed. Step 8.3 — Completed no follow up needed. Member Gubrud would like to revisit the Mission and Charter of the EEC. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS A. Request from Edina Go Green to address commercial recycling. Chair Sierks received a letter recommending the EEC to implement mandatory commercial recycling. Member Latham said the RSW Working Group has reviewed the request in the past and city staff gave an estimate of the number of hours it would be to enforce the recycling requirement. Member Latham asked that the EEC to table this item until there is city staff time available for enforcement and the city needs to create an inspection mechanism. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Gubrud to table until discussion of 2013 objectives. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS. Member Latham informed the Commissioners that her neighbors sealed their driveway with coal tar and made a formal complaint to the Edina Police Dept. Mr. Bintner is researching a method for testing the sealant to see if coal tar exists within it. Member Latham gave an update on Xcel Energy dropping Solar Incentives. Commissioner Latham excused herself from the meeting at 8:06 p.m. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Review Board and Commission Annual Work Plan Process. Ms Kurt said on September 19th the City Council will have a Work Session with all of the Commission Chairs to review their 2013 work plans. The Council will have its strategic retreat in October to plan for budget and staff. The City work plan will be released in November. Ms Kurt asked for a volunteer for a Human Services committee. Chair Sierks requested Commissioners to think about their top three priorities that they would like to complete in 2013 . that would fit with the EEC'Mission and Green Steps Cities,. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 9:14p.m. Motion made by Member Risser and seconded by Member Rudnicki to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respect" submitted, Rebecca Foster GIS Administrator MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 13, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Acting Chair Staunton called the meeting of the Edina Planning, Commission to order at 7:00 PM. II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Commissioners Scherer, Forrest, Schroeder, Platteter, Rock, Carpenter, Fischer and Staunton Absent from the roll: Grabiel, Potts and Cherkassy III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Meeting Agenda was approved as submitted. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Carpenter moved approval of the May 23, 2012, meeting minutes. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Mark Bretheim, 5429 Woodcrest Drive, addressed the Commission and submitted photos depicting the new house being constructed: next door to him. Bretheim said that while he understands the 1 -foot rule he thought it would apply to the entire lot.. 13.retheim explained that Woodcrest slopes down-and the changed grade and additional, fill to the neighboring lot created a very high retaining wall and, where before they had views of the creek they now will be viewing an air conditioner unit. Vice -Chair Staunton suggested that Mr. Bretheim give the photos to City Staff for their review. Staunton asked Planner Teague to review this issue and get back with Mr. Bretheim and the Planning Commission on his findings. VI. PUBLIC.HEARINGS A. A 19.2 and 5.1 foot front yard setback variance to build, a, new home at 6617 Parkwood Rd. Page 1 of 15 Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property is a corner lot located south of Parkwood Road and east of Parkwood Lane consisting of a rambler with an attached tuck -under garage. The property owner is hoping to demolish the existing home for the construction of a new home. The ordinance requires the new home maintain the front yard setbacks of the two adjacent homes, one fronting Pakwood Lane and the other fronting Parkwood Road. The front yard setback of the home to the south at 5509 Parkwood Lane is 81.6 feet. The front yard setback of the home to the east located at'6613 Parkwood Road is 50.7 feet. The existing home is nonconforming providing a 60.1 foot setback from Parkwood Lane and a 45.6 foot setback from Parkwood Road. The new home is proposed to be slightly farther from Parkwood Lane at approximately 62 feet and will match the existing nonconforming setback of 45.6 feet along Parkwood Road. The new home will be a two story home with an attached three car garage. Aaker noted the property is well over a half an acre with the new home occupying less than 17% of the lot area. The new home, while larger than the existing home is still not proposed to occupy as much land area as allowed by ordinance. The required setbacks from both Parkwood Lane and Parkwood Road unreasonably limit the building area of the lot given the existing nonconforming setbacks provided by the original home built on the lot in 1952. Staff believes it is reasonable for the owner to duplicate the nonconforming setbacks from the street frontages of the existing home. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is consistent with existing conditions and matches the nonconforming setback of the existing home. 3) The imposed setbacks limit design opportunity. The intent of the ordinance is to provide adequate spacing from the street. The proposed home will match the setback of the existing home that has been located on the lot since 1952. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified. by the conditions below: Survey date stamped May 22, 2012, building plans and elevations date stamped May 31,2012 Page 2 of 15 Appearing for the Applicant Chad and Kate Donnay, applicants Discussion /Comments Commissioner Forrest said this is reasonable request. She added in her opinion there is a definite hardship because the lot is a corner lot and is subjected to maintaining two front yard setbacks. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions, noting the hardship in maintaining two front yard setbacks. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. A 9.3 -foot front street setback variance at 5101 Arcadia Avenue for Ken and Brett Johnson, Eden Avenue Grill Planner Presentation Planner Teague told the Commission Ken and Brett Johnson, the owners of the Eden Avenue Grill are requesting a 9.3 -foot front street.setback variance to construct Cabreeze addition over the existing patio located on the south side of their restaurant located at 5101 Arcadia Avenue. The proposed Cabreeze structure is a four season porch type structure that would have a retractable roof. The addition would be constructed to match the colors of the existing building. The proposed addition would be setback 25.7 feet from the right -of -way of the exit ramp; the required setback is 35 feet, therefore, a Variance is requested. There are no changes proposed to the existing parking lot and drive - aisles. Based on the existing and proposed seating in the restaurant, there would be adequate parking on, the site to accommodate the proposed addtion. There would be a seating capacity of 117 and a maximum of nine employees on a maximum shift, therefore, 48 parking stalls are required. The site plan demonstrates 49 parking stalls. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested 9.3 -foot setback variance to construct a Cabreeze retractable roof addition to the existing Eden Avenue Grill at 5101 Eden Avenue for Ken and Brett Johnson. Approval is based on the following findings: a. The proposed use is reasonable. The addition would enclose an area that is currently used as a patio today. There would be no hardcover addition to the site. The addition would face the exit /entrance ramp from Arcadia and Page 3 of 15 Highway 100. Further south is an office building located 154 feet away. The addition would not have a significant visual impact in the area. b. The practical difficulty in caused by the existing location and layout of the restaurant would prevent the addition to be located on the site to meet the required setback and still function for the restaurant. If the addition was to be located on the east or north side of the building parking stall would be lost. If it were located on the west of the building a variance would also be required. C. The unique circumstance is the sites location with road right -of -way on three sides of the lot, which reduces the buildable area on the site. d. The variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The addition would replace an existing patio, and is adjacent to a freeway interchange. Approval is also is subject to the following conditions: 1) The site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site survey date stamped May 15, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped May 15, 2012. 2) A building permit must be obtained and work commenced within one year of the approving date of the variance, or the variance shall become null and void. A petition for a time extension may be considered within that first year. Appearing for the Applicant Ken and Brett Johnson, owners Discussion /Comments Commissioner Scherer asked if the proposed "structure" was enclosing an area already used for seating. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. He added that the present seating was seasonal. The proposed addition enables the area to be used all year. Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Teague if he was aware of any building code issues with this type of structure. Planner Teague responded that he wasn't aware of any issues, adding the addition would be reviewed by the building inspections department as part of the permitting process and would need to comply with all building and fire codes. Commissioner Scherer commented that in her opinion this addition won't be much of a change; however, she added she frequents this restaurant and parking is already an issue. Commissioner Carpenter said with this proposal he struggles with hardship and if this was Page 4 of 15 self- imposed, adding much to depend on when the patio was constructed. Applicant Presentation Mr. Johnson addressed the Commission and explained that the building was purchased by them in the 1970's. Johnson noted that parking is also a concern of theirs, adding that they are very fortunate to have on- street parking.available. Continuing, Johnson said that the proposed addition would be heated and would function all four seasons. Concluding Johnson said the roof and windows on the,proposed addition are retractable. Johnson displayed a materials board for review by the Commission. Vice Chair Staunton asked if anyone in the audience w6uld.0re to address this request; being none Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing.: Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motiowcarried. A discussion ensued on hardship, and parking with the majority of Commissioners in agreement that the variance was reasonable. Noting that the present patio has been in existence for years and the location of the proposed structure and topography of the site reduces the visibility and impact of the structure. Planner Teague also pointed out another difficulty for redevelopment of this site is that this site is surrounded on three sides by streets; which creates a hardship in meeting setback. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions; noting because this site is encumbered on three' sides by streets an additional hardship is encountered. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Forrest, Platteter, Fischer, Staunton. Nay; Carpenter. C. Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home one -foot above the first floor elevation of the existing home at 55,37 Park Place for Kate Schmitt, Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the property owner Kate Schmitt, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home at 5537 Park Place. A Conditional Use Permit is being requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the previous home by more than one foot. Specifically the applicant would like to raise the first floor elevation 3.75 feet above the first floor elevation of the previous home that had occupied the site. The first floor of the previous home was.at 865.3 feet. The new first floor is proposed to be at 869.05 feet. The maximum allowed increase without a Conditional Use Permit is 866.3 feet The new first floor is proposed to be 2.75 feet over the one foot allowed by city code in order to reasonably protect the lower level of Page 5 of 15 the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The attached Report of Geotechnical Exploration and letter dated May 1, 2012, from ITCO Allied Engineering Co., regarding ground water levels indicates ground water at a level of 855.29 with a recommended lowest floor elevation of 859.29. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for a new home at 5537 Park Place. The Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation of 869.05 feet which is 3.75 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing home and 2.75 feet above first floor height allowed by ordinance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped August 19, 2011 • Building plans and elevations date stamped May 23, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Appearing for the Applicant Kate Schmitt, applicant and Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes. Discussion /Comments Vice Chair Staunton explained that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow construction of a single dwelling home with a first floor elevation of more than one -foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing home. Staunton said the CUP process was established to accommodate construction and /or the remodeling of property within a flood plain or to protect the dwelling from ground water intrusion. Continuing, Staunton said that Code also requires confirmation from FEMA and a licensed hydrologist. Page 6 of 15 Commissioner Fischer further clarified that the request for a CUP was different from a request for variance. Fischer said with a variance the Commission looks at finding hardship; with the conditional use permit an applicant is required to,meet specific conditions as outlined in the. Code. Commissioner Schroeder asked Planner Aaker if Code provides a definition of mass. Planner Aaker responded the Code does not define mass._ Applicant Presentation Scott Busyn, 4615 Wooddale Avenue, addressed the Commission and explained that the house was in disrepair and was raised, adding that the vacant lot was removed from the Federal Emergency Management Agency in 20.12. Busyn said that while the property was . removed from the special flood hazard -area, it still has elevated ground water issues. Continuing, Busyn said that the lot is located in the Colonial Grove neighborhood which is an area of different, housing types and a neighborhood in transition. Busyn pointed out that in this area because of the ground water issues many of the homes- do not have basements and to keep this home "dry" the house can't be constructed at the required 1 -foot level. Busyn told the Commission the Schmitt's want the new house to fit into the neighborhood. Busyn said they worked very hard to be respectful of building height pointing out that the height of the proposed house could actually be higher. Busyn said that the low floor elevation is 859.3- feet,: adding the applicant desires to have an 8.75 -foot ceiling height in the basement. Busyn said eight to nine foot basement ceiling heights are typical in Edina in new home construction. Busyn did acknowledged that code requires basement ceiling height to be 7 -feet or greater. Concluding, Busyn said that the home proposed to be built will 'be a beautiful home constructed with high quality building materials. Busyn added he held a neighborhood meeting and communicated with all neighbors. Busyn also noted that a sign was posted on the site indicating this property was seeking a CUP.. Commissioner Schroeder asked Mr. Busyn his definition is of "mass ". Busyn responded that at the 'end of the day it's usually how the new house ties into the neighborhood. Busyn said to ensure that the mass of-the new house fits in with the neighborhood the ridge height, eave line, etc. of the adjacent'houses also need to be, calculated to, ensure that the height of the proposed house ties into the neighborhood. Busyn also pointed out that the streetscape was also important to keep in mind when designing a new - house. Commissioner Platteter noted that even though the low floor elevation is being raised to accommodate the ground water the height of the proposed house is still below what it could be. Busyn agreed, he added the first floor elevation was raised; however through design features the house is being "squashed" from the top. Vice -Chair Staunton open the public hearing. Page 7 of 15 Public Comment Brian Belanger, 5533 Oaklawn Avenue said his concern was with the finished roof height adding that he was pleased to learn that the height was actually lower than what was permitted. Mr. Belanger commented that he was surprised that Edina Code doesn't' define "mass ". Continuing, Belanger said he likes what he sees; adding in his opinion the proposed house is nicely proportioned and blends well with the neighborhood. Concluding, Belanger said his concern is if veering away from the 1 -foot rule becomes common place. He stated he doesn't what the 1 -foot rule ignored; but strictly enforced, unless circumstances warrant otherwise. Commissioners pointed out that very specific requirements need to be met before a resident can seek a CUP to exceed the allowable 1- foot requirement. Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Continuing Discussion Commissioner Fischer reported for those in the audience and at home that this is only the second time the City has heard a request for a CUP to accommodate FEMA and ground water issues. The CUP is a tool that allows the City to scrutinize each request to ensure all requirements of the Code are met. Continuing, Fischer said that height is easy to measure; the harder point is mass and scale. This request met Code conditions #2 and #4 which allowed the applicant to move forward with the CUP. Fischer stated from a mass perspective that he believes this design does a good job in responding to the requirements stipulated in the Code. Commissioner Forrest commented that it appeared to her that the orientation of the house was changing. Mr. Busyn agreed. He said that the front door of new house would face West 56th Street with the garage facing Park Place. Commissioner Scherer commented that although it appears to be common practice for new homes to have basement ceiling heights of 8 plus feet the building Code only requires basements to have 7 -foot ceilings. Scherer pointed out it's the choice of the applicant to exceed the ceiling height minimum requirement. Teague agreed; adding minimum basement ceiling height is 7 -feet. Teague explained that the CUP process was established to allow properties to "get out of the flood zone; which is a Code requirement. Teague also noted that basements are required by Code and it can be argued that the City has conflicting ordinances. Scherer stated she really likes the design and scale of the home; however, it's a conundrum for her if the ceiling-height exceeds 7 -feet. Concluding, Scherer said she agrees with Busyn that Colonial Grove is a neighborhood in transition and with the flood and ground water issues in this area she envisions that more CUP's will be requested. Commissioner Fischer acknowledged that point; adding the easy part of these requests is where the basement level starts, however, he added there are other issues to consider; Page 8 of 15 what's necessary; what's required and what's best for re -sale which becomes what's best for Edina. A brief discussion ensued on basement ceiling height. What's building code and what's best and if a "maximum" basement ceiling height should be established in the Conditional Use Permit application. Commissioner Carpenter commented that, his sense is that the Code is relatively new.and that it will take time to see how it's working. Carpenter said reviewing,it on a case;by case, basis; in his opinion was best: He,said establishing a basement ceiling:height different from the building code wasn't a good idea: Vice Chair Staunton said he would be reluctant to establish a hard and fast basement ceiling height minimum in the CUP. He reiterated building code stipulates a minimum basement ceiling height of 7- feet,.4dding that's a starting point; however establishing a hard number in the zoning code for these cases would be difficult. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out that stipulation #4 "An increase in first floor elevation will'only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in height, mass and scale", adding this is a good way to measure outcome. Schroeder acknowledged that the City consistently struggles with defining mass, adding in his opinion'the answer should be to review each request on a case by case basis. Continuing, Schroeder said the applicant needs to demonstrate the need for a dwelling to exceed the first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit.building, pointing out that this too is a relatively new ordinance enacted to control building height. Schroeder said with the CUP option the City has recognized that in certain cases our ordinances cannot be met, reiterating reviewing this on a case by case basis in his opinion is best. Schroeder,also pointed out with this application the applicant has demonstrated building height and mass; the applicant has indicated that this is a neighborhood in transition with a wide variety of housing types and the applicant has documentation confirming conditions #2 and #4 of the CUP. Commissioner Scherer reiterated her only comment was that the basement ceiling height doesn't have to:-be over 7 -feet; adding she recognizes Moot. ceilings. aren't the norm in new construction. Scherer said raising the first floor building elevation to accommodate a taller basement ceiling.is something she considered. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval based on staff findings, staff conditions, discussion, and public testimony. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Page 9 of 15 Vice Chair Staunton acknowledged the following e-mail that were present to the Commission June 13th: • 5521 Dever Drive • 5528 Woodcrest Drive • 55010aklawn • 5600 Woodcrest Drive All voted aye; motion carried. D. Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home one -foot above the first floor elevation of the existing home at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road for Doug and Abby Power. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker told the Commission Doug and Abby Power, are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to tear down an existing house and construct a new home at 4805 East Sunnyslope. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The applicant is proposing to raise the first floor elevation 4.68 feet above the existing first floor elevation. The existing first floor is at 895.91 feet with an allowed increase in height by code to 896.91 feet. The proposed first floor will be at a height of 900.58 feet. The property is a penninsula backing up to Minnehaha Creek and falls within the 1% annual chance of flooding.. The flood protection elevation along that portion of the creek is at 888.1 feet. The ordinance requires that all basement /lowest floors be elevated to a minimum 2 feet above the flood protection elevation. The existing basement elevation of the home is at 887 or 1.1 feet below the flood protection elevation. The proponents are proposing a basement elevation of 890.1 to comply with the minimum floodplain requirements. The ordinance allows the first floor to be raised by one foot or to an elevation of 896.91 feet. The low floor must be no lower than two feet above 888.1, which would result in a 6' 10" height difference between the basement floor and the first floor. Modern building practices generally include 18" floor trusses resulting in a basement ceiling height of 5' 4" without the benefit of a Conditional Use Permit. The builder has provided examples of other homes they have built within Edina. The home is designed similar in style to 5200 Mirror Lakes Drive, 4600 Woodland Road and 4617 Tower Street. Page 10 of 15 Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for Doug-and Abby Power for property located at 4805 East Sunnyslope Road. The, Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation 3.67 feet above the first floor elevation" of the existing home. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2.. The ,proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped May 14, 2012. • Building plans and elevations date stamped May 14, 2012. . 2. " Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans'are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Appearing for the Applicant Doug and Abby Power, applicants, Charles Mooty, property owner, Nate Wissink, Elevation Homes. Applicant Presentation Mr. Power introduced himself to the Commission informing them that at the present time he and his family were renting a home on Drexel Avenue while they.go through the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and building permit process. Power said he was very excited to build a new house in Edina. Mr. Wissink addressed the Commission and highlighted aspects of the Conditional Use Permit. Wissink explained that given that the subject property is in the flood plain Condition 1 was addressed allowing the lower.level floor to be two (2) feet above the flood plain elevation. Wissink said the applicant is proposed,a basement elevation of 890.1 to comply with the minimum floodplain requirements. Continuing, Wissink informed the Commission the Sunnyslope neighborhood is characterized by hilly topography, large Page 11 of 15 home site and a variety of architectural styles of home ranging from ramblers to Y2 story home and full two story homes. Wissink pointed out the design of the proposed home is a double gable, 1.5 story home with walkout lower level. Discussion f comments Vice Chair Staunton asked what the elevation is along this portion of the creek. Wissink responded it is roughly 881.1 feet. Staunton said if he understands the request correctly the "new" basement elevation as proposed is 890.1 feet which appears high. Wissink said modern building practices tend to include 18" floor trusses and when you add the floor material dimensions etc. height is increased. Commissioner Forrest commented that in her opinion if she understands the plans correctly that the property owner to the northwest will be impacted by the proposed grade changes, retaining wall and site lines. Forrest suggested redesign; maybe reorient the garage. Mr. Wissink agreed adding they are working very closely with the neighbor to the north to mitigate any issues they may have. Vice -Chair Staunton opened the public hearing Public Comment Roxane Lehmann 4801 E Sunnyslope Road told the Commission she was the immediate neighbor to the northwest. Lehmann said she really likes the applicants but does have concerns; especially with the auto court. Lehmann said the auto court is very close to the common property line. She acknowledged she has been working closely with the applicants and their builder; however, she reiterated she has concerns about potential water issues from not only the creek but water run -off issues from the new house and auto court. Lehmann also pointed out 4805 is at a higher elevation and that the incline in this area between properties is apparent. Continuing, Lehmann reiterated she worries about already being in a 100 year flood plain and now is concerned that the adjacent property which is at a higher elevation has an auto court so close to the common line. Concluding, Lehmann said that aesthetically this is a lovey area with a very spacious feel between the homes will now be lost. The "feel' of the area will change. Vice -chair Staunton asked for clarification if 4805 is at a higher elevation then the neighboring property at 4801 Sunnyslope. Planner Teague clarified that 4805 is at a higher elevation. Vice -Chair closed asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Page 12 of 15 Continued Discussion /Comments Commissioner Fischer asked Commissioner Schroeder if in his opinion the drainage has been appropriately handled. Commissioner Schroeder said that it appears to him theyfare doing the right thing. Vice -Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify how drainage is addressed. Planner Teague explained when a building permit is applied for the City's Engineering Department reviews all plans with respect to drainage and drainage patterns. Teague said if he recalls the ordinance correctly new construction cannot negatively impact the present water flow by directing more water run- off.onto adjoining properties. Continuing, Teague said he would ask City Engineer Houle, to draft a memo reflecting his opinion•on drainage for this property. Staunton said he recalls that the rate.of water run -off on adjoining properties can't be increased. Teague agreed, adding usually with new construction measures are implemented that actually improve the drainage patterns., Commissioner Platteter acknowledged the grade change and swale to handle water run -off and asked Mr. Wissink if there are plans to landscape this area. It was acknowledged by the landscape architect that this area would be landscaped; probably with coniferous plantings, adding there is a "pinch point ", at the southwest corner where the drainage plan will be established, adding it's possible a French drain may be developed or a dry well system. Commissioner Schroeder noted that criteria #4 of the Conditional. Use Permit deals with mass. Schroeder pointed out that building elevations were not provided for all elevations; especially from the creek. Schroeder said in his opinion not only is the street scape important but how the building looks from the public water. ways was also important. Schroeder said without these elevations it is difficult to make an educated decision on mass. Commissioner Scherer agreed. She also noted the lots along Browndale and Sunnnyside Road on the other side of the creek will have an unobstructed view of the proposed house, adding she would also_ like to see this elevation. Planner Teague said he agreed, adding if the Commission wasn't comfortable in making a decision without those elevations they should continue this item to the next meeting of the Commission. Charles Mooty, property owner told the Commission the houses on the opposite side of the creek are at a higher elevation than the subject site. Mooty said in his opinion, the house as proposed is a good house and this is a wonderful opportunity to upgrade this lot. Mr. Power said at this time they are renting their current home on Drexel and would like to have their house completed. at the time their lease expires, adding that if at all possible he would like the Commission to act on their request as soon as possible. Mrs. Power said that the house plans before them will be built as indicated; however, with not owning the property all elevations haven't been completed. Page 13 of 15 Mr. Wissink entered into the official record elevations of the proposed new house from the south, east, west (without garage) and north. Commissioner Schroeder said in his opinion these elevations can be accepted as an amendment to the packet. Schroeder said in his opinion the Commission can proceed on this request because relevant elevations have been received. Commissioner Forrest stated she is still concerned. She said in her opinion (even though the applicants and neighbor are working together) this new house creates a significant change; not only with drainage patterns but visually as well. Forrest said the auto court is very close; reiterating this will be a big change for the neighbor to the northwest. Commissioner Fischer said he agrees this is a change; however, he pointed out that it's garage to garage. Not living space to garage. A discussion ensued on the Conditional Use Permit process with Commissioners acknowledging that this is a change for neighboring properties; however, the purview of the Commission is to determine if a Conditional Use Permit is warranted to elevate the house from the flood plain. It was pointed out that #1 was met and with the addition of building elevations #4 is met. Motion Commissioner Schroeder moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval based on the additional information that was provided to the Commission this evening and that the additional drawings provided to the Commission be submitted as part of the official public record. Recommended approval is also based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Schroeder, Platteter, Carpenter, Fischer, Staunton. Nay; Forrest. It was also suggested that before the meeting of the Edina city Council that the City Engineer draft a memo indicating his opinions on the CUP. It was further suggested that the applicant continue to work with the neighbors to the west; Mr. and Mrs. Lehmann. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Vice -chair Staunton acknowledged receipt of "back of packet" materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Carpenter commented in reference to variances and what constitutes self - created issues he would like this topic discussed at a work session. Carpenter also requested guidance on this issue from the City Attorney. Planner Teague responded that in Page 14 of 15 his opinion this is a good idea that he would look into. He added it's been a while since the Commission and the City Attorney met and it would be a good time for a "refresher ". Commissioner Fischer asked Planner Teague for clarification about a meeting Commissioners were invited to attendwith the Transportation Commission. Planner Teague explained that on June 26th there will be a meeting at the new Public Works facility from 7 -9 pm. Teague explained the meeting is with the Transportation Commission and others about examining the crossings along the France Avenue corridor. Vice - Staunton addressed the Commission and informed them tonight is Commissioner Rocks last Planning Commission meeting before he leaves for college.. Staunton said Rock has been an excellent student member and thanked Rock for all his hard work on the Commission. IX. STAFF COMMENTS None X. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10 pm Page 15 of 15 Jackie Hoogenakker Respectfully submitted .MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION MAY 22, 2012 7:00 pm CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM. II. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Newell, Winnick, Chair Kingston and Student Member Aderhold. Staff present: Lisa Schaefer, Human Resources Director and Staff Liaison; and Candy Fiedler, administrative staff. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee and seconded by Commissioner Cashmore approving the meeting agenda of May 22, 2012 with the following addition: III.A. Add Item 13, Community Council Meeting Report under the Work Plan. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Finsness, Newell, and Winnick. Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Cashmore and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee approving the consent agenda: IV.A. Approve the,meeting minutes of April 24, 2012. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Erhardt, Newell, and Winnick. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no community comments. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Chair Kingston said the Commission was to report on the Work Plan updates. For every item the commission should decide if it is done, not done but should be removed from.the plan, or not done and remain on the plan. For items not done but remaining on the plan, action items need to be determined. VI.A. Work Plan — Strategic Review of Work Plan 1. Procurement Policy Commissioner Cashmore reported the City Council voted unanimously to approve the Procurement Policy with one small change. He added that the representative from STAND and Chair Kingston did a great job presenting this to Council and it can now be removed from the work plan. Chair Kingston said that information is being worked on for Channel 16 by staff member Denfeld, noting that Edina is the first city in Minnesota that has a Resolution adopted. Chair Kingston applauded members Cashmore and Winnick for their great work. 2. Monitor Domestic Partner Ordinance Item #4 is to purchase items from companies owned by domestic partners when bids are taken. The Council requested this be revised to say if bids are tied, the bid from a domestic partner company will be favored. Member Cashmore will draft a revision this week and it will be forwarded to the members to discuss at the June meeting. Commissioner Bigbee brought up that he had met with Phil Duran, an attorney from Outfront Minnesota. Duran suggested that when public buildings are being built they should have unisex restrooms that do not designate gender, in order to be more sensitive to the transgender community. He asked if this is something the commission could look into. Commissioner Newell questioned if this should be a Resolution brought to City Council for public buildings, and will this be publicly funded. She asked if someone from the Commission should sit with Mr. Duran to see what exactly is wanted. Commissioner Erhardt mentioned that unisex bathrooms can be messy if they don't contain urinals. Commissioner Cashmore suggested the subcommittee working on the domestic partners will look into this. 12. Supreme Court Decision on Super PACs Chair Kingston asked that this work item be moved so Laird Beaver, who was at the meeting as a guest, could present his information. Mr. Beaver gave those present a handout, which included notes on "Citizens United" Supreme Court decision and "Corporate Personhood ". He said there were many groups in town who want an amendment to overturn the ruling of the Supreme Court noting that corporations are not people. Huge amounts of money are flowing into elections and the law states that it does not need to be disclosed where the money is coming from. The money influences who gets elected and even who is selected to run. He would like to work with committees to create a Resolution from the City in support of the Constitutional Amendment that corporations are not people, and money is not speech. Mr. Beaver also handed out a sample Resolution which the City of Duluth used, an article from Common Dreams.org, and other documents from Move to Amend to use as examples. His request was to be consistent with the domestic partners issue and join the other organizations by having Edina create a Resolution similar to those he handed out. He said that Representative Keith Ellison is in favor of this also. Commissioner Newell asked if there were other groups in Edina and Mr. Beaver said he was working more with St. Paul people. Student Member Aderhold said he knew that active Democrats from Edina were against the ruling as well. Commissioner Finsness and Student Member Aderhold are going to research thi9 further to determine whether or not the issue was appropriate for EHRRC. They will discuss at the June Meeting. 3. Initiate Census Research Funding Recommendation Commissioner Newell reported she would prefer to wait until Commissioner Stanton has returned from Greece to go over this work plan item. She said he has been in contact with a person from the YMCA. Chair Kingston asked that the subcommittee come back with recommendations for the July meeting. Commissioner Erhardt noted to keep in mind that the Y's market area includes Richfield, South Minneapolis and Bloomington. Commissioner Winnick said the Edina Community Council was hiring from Community Outreach for the Oak Glen and Parklawn Neighborhoods. He has talked with the new director, Carrie Cabe and $20,000 Blue Cross Blue Shield's do.Town funds were available. These funds are available to seek and hire community organizers from the East Asian, Somali, and other minority communities, and to possibly arrange a community event. The Community Council meets nine times per year and the next meeting is scheduled for September 11th. Commissioners Newell and Stanton will look into partnering with them. Chair Kingston said there is money available from HRRC to possibly use for an event. Commissioner Cashmore questioned if Work Items 13, 3 and 8 could be joined to create one work item. Chair Kingston said the items should be separate and it will be clearer as updates are given. Commissioner Finsness questioned if some of these items should have been removed from the last meeting and Commissioner Newell said item 10, Somali Relief efforts was completed and could be removed. 4. Update Bias /Hate Crimes Response Plan Commissioner Winnick reported on Student Member Nolan's comments from the April meeting regarding the Jewish Cemetery. He met with representatives from the cemetery who found that the graves were located too near the street for a fence to be feasible and that plans were to erect boulders, trees, and hedges. Although this cemetery is not fenced, no vandalism crimes have been reported. He will meet again after Memorial Day. He will contact Student Member Nolan to discuss this with her. 5. Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals Student Member Aderhold said Student Member Nolan had more to report on this Work Item, but was not present to do so. He said there was information in some of the classrooms and that there were teachers who had the Holocaust in their curriculum. Commissioner Cashmore said this work item can now be removed from the 2012 Work Plan. 6. Anti - Bullying Event and Education Commissioner Finsness said she had nothing to report yet on this item. The Bully Project is done. Chair Kingston asked whether or not this item should be kept on the agenda. Commissioners Bigbee and Finsness along with the two new students this fall will continue working on this. Student Member Aderhold said there was a student who put together a documentary on bullying, which he is trying to have shown at the Edina Theater. It is currently available to view on YouTube. He will send Staff Liaison Schaefer and Staff Member Fiedler the date of the event to forward to those present. Commissioner Cashmore said he would be willing to work on this topic. Commissioner Winnick said it is important to not just think of schools with regard to bullying, and that the City, especially Parks and Recreation, and Community Council should be included. Commissioner Newell asked if there could be a paragraph on the Parent Release Forms against bullying. Staff Liaison Schaefer noted parents register online and yes, the City could do this with Council approval. Commissioner Winnick noted there is protocol and procedure in Parks and Recreation we are not empowered to do investigations, but can be an advisor to the City Council. Commissioner Bigbee asked if we should have another Resolution stating what kind of community we want to have and that it would be free of bullying behavior. Commissioner Finsness discussed Edina Reads, which is an event that includes everyone in the City. A book is selected for all to read within three months, then the author is invited to speak at a "meet and greet" event for all to come and hear. This is a non - threatening event which targets the entire city. Commissioner Newell referred to Nicholas Kristof's winning essay which is an eloquent story of a young girl who had been bullied adding that this would be good to get youth involved. Commissioner Erhardt stated that parents and all adults needed to correct their behavior as well. Student Member Aderhold said he had not heard of this before so it would be important to advertise it well. Commissioners Bigbee and Finsness will meet and look into the timing for this event and return in June with ideas. Commissioner Bigbee suggested advertising in the Sun Current and Edina Patch for the best sources to reach Edina residents. The subcommittee will come back with ideas for the June meeting. 7. Marriage Amendment Forum Commissioner Newell asked that Commissioner Stanton's request to consider addressing Voter ID also be addressed in addition to, not instead of the Marriage Amendment. Chair Kingston asked if the intent of the marriage amendment forum was for arguments for and against to be presented to the public to hear. Commissioner Bigbee said both points of view should be expressed, that way they wouldn't be "taking sides ". Student member Aderhold said this was a controversial issue for some and we can't have bias towards either side. It would be best to have an organized panel, and structure both sides so there isn't a "free for all debate ". Chair Kingston said with the Primary in August and the election in November, August, September or October would be the best time for this. Commissioner Cashmore questioned if the League of Women Voters might be interested. Commissioner Finsness said Commissioner Stanton has already asked them and they were not interested, because this was a not bipartisan issue. Staff Liaison Schaefer commented that the League of Women Voters declined to sponsor a forum, because they had already come out in opposition to the amendment. The City cannot spend funds for political campaigns, but could present a balanced statement of the facts. Since the City has already publicly stated its opposition to the amendment, it is in a similar position to the League of Women Voters. Commissioner Bigbee said there were lots of groups who would encourage people to vote no on the Marriage Amendment. Those groups speak with more freedom than the HRRC. Chair Kingston said she will speak with Commissioner Stanton to get an update on the topic. 8. Diversity Awareness Event Chair Kingston reported she had met with Student Member Nolan regarding celebrating the changing face of Edina in the 4th of July Parade next year. They thought a campaign selling tee shirts, bracelets, or bumper stickers showing we are changing in Edina would be a good way to advertise this and asked what the group thought. Commissioner Winnick said we should be sensitive and seek input from the Edina Resource Center and see what they think to be sure that certain groups would not be offended. Commissioner Finsness voiced concerns about the messaging and the objectives of the theme as presented by the Chair and supported Commissioner Winnick's statement about being sensitive to our community. Chair Kingston indicated the purpose of this discussion was to determine whether or not it was worth having a subcommittee research the idea, and not to discuss specifics of what should be done. After discussion, Commissioner Newell made the motion to separate the diversity in a parade idea and suggested celebrating diversity in an essay contest. There was no second. Commissioner Cashmore stated that no one was prepared this evening to present a plan at this meeting. He was hoping that a subcommittee could come back with recommendations. Commissioner Cashmore made the motion that a subcommittee looks into the idea and comes back with recommendations that can then be discussed. Commissioner Bigbee seconded. Motion carried. Commissioner Cashmore will update the Commission at the August meeting. 9. Days of Remembrance Chair Kingston asked if any other members were able to go to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum Exhibition and the answer was no. The Days of Remembrance event is complete for this year, and can be removed from the work plan. 10. Somali Relief Efforts Commissioner Newell indicated this item should be removed. 11. Tom Oye Award Criteria Commissioner Finsness and Commissioner Winnick will present a draft of a rubric at the July meeting for consideration 12. Supreme Court Decision on Super PACs This item was previously discussed. 13. Community Council Meeting Report Commissioner Winnick handed out a brochure on an event he had attended at St. Patrick's Church, Edina Health & Wellness Expo, which he wanted to share with the Commission. He said it was an event attended by senior citizens from the area where they get together to find out about resources in the community. He thought it would be good to have a booth or display letting people learn about the HRRC. Commissioner Bigbee thought this would be good to explore for 2013 and Commissioner Winnick will work with him to explore the possibility. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS No correspondence or petitions were received. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Bigbee discussed a gap in transportation access that should be dealt with on next year's work plan. The topic came up at last Tuesday's City Council meeting regarding sidewalks on France and Hazelton. Chair Kingston said she was approached by the Mayor regarding signing a Senate bill on Violence Against Women. There was not enough time to discuss this before the HRRC meeting. After discussion, the Mayor along with 60 mayors signed a petition for the Senate bill supporting the Violence Against Women's Act. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Staff Liaison Schaefer questioned if it would be helpful to have two lists of the Work Plan, one from the minutes and one in a monthly calendar format. It was decided to try this for the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Kingston declared the meeting adjourned at 9:15 PM. Respectfully submitted, Candy Fiedler, Administrative Staff Minutes approved by HRRC, June 26, 2012 Jessi Kingston, HRRC Chair MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall - Community Room Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER 1 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Carr,:and Members Stegner, Davis, Curran, Moore, Christiaansen, Mellom, Sussman and Ellingboe. Absent were Members Anger and Copman. Staff present was Planner Joyce Repya. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel -was also in attendance. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Curran moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Regular meeting of May 8, 2012 Member Stegner moved approval of the minutes from the May 8, 2012, meeting of the board. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Certificates of Appropriateness Planner Repya explained that the Board,was Bearing two requests for the teardown and new_ construction of homes in the historic Country Club District. Both homes were built after the period of significance (1924 -1944) .thus the teardown of the homes is permissible. The responsibility of the Board is to approve the design of the new homes taking into consideration the Secretary of the Interior's Standards as well as the design guidelines provided in the District's plan of treatment. Ms..Repya also explained that the process for design review is completed in two meetings; the first which is this evening entails a presentation of the design proposal by the applicant with comments and possible suggestions for changes provided by the HPB and interested parties — No vote is taken at this time. The second meeting (one month later) involves a presentation of the final design of the new home,, which should take into account the comments and suggestions provided at the first meeting: It is at the second meeting that the HPB will take action on the Certificate of Appropriateness application. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 12, 2012 I. H -12 -3 4524 Bruce Avenue — New Home with Attached Garage Planner Repya reported that the subject property is located on the west side of the 4500 block of Bruce Avenue. The existing home is one of the few remaining Contemporary style homes in the District; constructed in 1973. A 2 -stall front loading attached garage is located on the south side of the home. The COA request involves demolishing the existing home with the intention of building a Tudor Revival inspired home with attached garage at the rear of the home accessed by a driveway on the south side of the property. Ms. Repya shared the streetscape comparing the proposed home with the homes on either side; as well as all elevations of the proposed home and detached garage. The then introduced Matt Hamish, with JMS Custom Homes who provided a detailed explanation of the proposed replacement home pointing out that the new structure has been designed to complement the size, scale and massing of the surrounding homes. The attached garage has been located on the rear of the home to not only ensure that it is not visible from the front street, but to also provide a home that blends with the existing streetscape. Mr. Hamish added that the exterior finish of the home has been designed in the traditional Tudor style and color typical with the historic Tudor homes in the Country Club District. Board Member Comments /Questions: Member Mellom commented that in her opinion the home is beautiful, but there is too much detailing and it appears to overwhelm the homes on either side. She added that the proposed stone base and trim board are "a bit much" and suggested reducing the height of the stone base and eliminating some of the trim. Member Christiaansen questioned the width of the new driveway; and commented that the material used on a portion ofthe front porch roof appears to be some type of metal- adding that typically a roof like this is copper. She also noted the proposed dormer on the south elevation looks awkward when viewed from the front street. Concluding, Christiaansen suggested eliminating one of two design trim elements. Mr. Hamish acknowledged that the new driveway was narrower than the existing driveway, and agreed copper roofs are seen throughout the District. Hamish said he would consider the suggested changes. Member Moore commented that while he likes the intentions, he feels too much is "going on'; adding in his opinion the exterior design is very busy. Member Curran agreed with the comment from Member Moore and added that it may be possible for the applicant to eliminate some of the timbering trim to reduce the "busy" look of the home's exterior. Member Davis stated that he likes the house; the scale and mass are good. Public Comments /Questions: Leo and Marilyn Pertl, 4525 Casco Avenue, Mrs. Pertl told the Board she lives on Casco directly behind the subject property and would like the applicant (if at all possible) to save the pine trees that are Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 12, 2012 located along the common property line. Mrs. Pertl explained that the evergreens provide year round screening between their homes. Mr. Hamish responded that a decision hasn't been made on all trees; however he acknowledged some trees would be removed and additional trees planted. Ann Wordelman, 4522 Bruce Avenue, addressed the Board and informed them she is the northerly abutting neighbor, adding her comments relate to the guidelines. Ms. Wordelman said she has a concern With the proposed stucco, panels adding in her opinion a "real" stucco finish meets the intent of the preservation guidelines and is in keeping-with the true character of finishing materials found within the District not stucco panels: Concluding Wordelman said she is also concerned that extensive timbering would be used, to cover the seams,. adding,she.surveyed the area and didn't view excess timbering on other homes in.the District; most notable the sides of houses. Bruce Leslie; 4526 Bruce Avenue, southerly abutting neighbor told�the applicant he has a question on an encroachment issue and asked to details. Mr. Hamish told Mr. Leslie he would set up a time to discuss that issue with him. Paul Runice, 4624 Bruce Avenue,, explained that he lives one block south, next door to the other COA replacement home the Board will address this evening, but he wanted the Board to know that his block has had a less than desirable experience with JMS in the past, so there may be a . "hangover" effect with this project. Kitty O'Dea, 4510 Bruce Avenue, commented that she is concerned with the proposed porch extension into the front yard setback area, adding in her.opinion it's not consistent with the District and intrudes on site lines. Continuing, O'Dea said "she agrees with past comments on timbering adding that the total look of the proposed house is too busy with too many windows. O'Dea also agreed with previous comments that the stone base is too much. Concluding, O'Dea suggested that the applicant provide a scaled "straight on" sketch to be. viewed at the .next meeting. She pointed out the illustration presented is angled; reiterating she wants to see the facade straight.on. Chair Carr thanked the public for their input. A discussion ensued with Board Members-indicating that the scale and mass of the proposed home is good; however, there are some details they would like the applicant to reconsider; such as: Shorten the stone base • Somehow reduce the amount of timbering trim and make the best use of the stucco panels to reduce the "busy" appearance of the exterior • Consider using copper on the roof extension Jeff Schoenwetter, JMS Homes, addressed the Board explaining that the proposed home is complementary to the District. As required in the plan of treatment, this replacement home is not an exact replica, but a contemporary Tudor Revival Style that complements the surrounding historic homes. Schoenwetter Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 12, 2012 pointed out that the drivet, hardy board, and stucco panels on the exterior of the home is a product that has been very successful for him- in fact he has used in on new homes he has constructed in the District; inciting the Board to view the Tudor style his company built at 4601 Drexel Avenue. Concluding, Schoenwetter said he would take into consideration the comments heard this evening when designing the final product for submittal. Chair Carr thanked the applicant for their presentation and the public for their comments. She added that the Board looks forward to reviewing the final plan at the July meeting. No formal action was taken. 2. H -12 -4 4624 Bruce Avenue — New Home with Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property consists of an American Colonial style home constructed in 1950. A front loading, tandem, attached garage is located on the south side of the home. The COA request involves demolishing the existing home with the intention of replacing it with a new home and detached garage and new driveway on the north side of the property. Ben Nelson, of Nelson Residential Design Inc. explained that Donnay Homes is proposing to construct a 2 story Tudor inspired home that has been designed to complement the surrounding homes, abiding by the district's plan of treatment. The natural stucco cladding is not aggressive and will not include any wood timbering. The home will have a long ridgeline paralleling the street with clean, simple lines. The, eave lines are consistent with the neighboring homes. The front entry door will have a 2 inch stone veneer surrounding the doorway; and the same stone is continued along the front foundation on the south side. Addressing the garage plan, Mr. Nelson pointed out that the plan is consistent in materials to the proposed home and the height provided is the average . of the neighboring detached garages — no taller. Board members responded very favorably to the proposed plan expressing the following comments: Member Sussman stated that he was impressed with the design providing a creative interpretation.of a Tudor Design. Members Moore, Stegner and Curran were in agreement. Member Mellom stated that she liked the use of real stucco rather than the stucco panels which allowed them to forgo the wood trim. She also complimented the plan for limiting the use of stone and providing a nice transition with the pitch of the roof. Chair Carr stated that she liked the plan, but questioned the bank of windows on the second story of the front elevation — commenting that the four windows so close together is not commonly seen on the original Country Club Tudors. Ben Nelson commented that in keeping with the plan of treatments direction to include contemporary elements in the design of new homes, the placement of the windows adds a stronger graphic feel to the home, while also providing more daylight to the interior spaces. 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 12, 2012 Member Christiaansen stated that she liked the plan for the windows but questioned the number of muntins (panes) on each window. She suggested that by reducing the double hung window's muntin pattern from six over six to four over four more light would be provided to the interior, and the windows would better compliment those on the neighboring homes. Community Comments were received from the following: Ms. Repya explained that an email was received from Scott and Katie Peterson, 4626 Bruce Avenue, the southerly abutting property in which they commented that although unable to attend the meeting, they had reviewed the plans for the new home and were concerned with the combined impact of moving the driveway to the north side of the property, and replacing a one story tandem garage abutting his home with a new 2 story structure. They stressed that with the placement of a taller structure closer to their home the sky view they currently appreciate would be diminished. The Petersons stated that they would "withhold their full support for the project" based upon the substantial impact it will have on their property. They added that if the driveway were to remain on the south side of the new home, or the profile n the south elevation were amended, they would be more likely to support the project. Paul Runice, 4522 Bruce Avenue, the northerly abutting neighbor commented that the new home proposed appears to compliment the neighborhood nicely. He did have questions regarding the grading on the property and how the drainage would flow from the driveway. Mr. Donnay offered to meet Mr. Runice to walk the property and explain the proposed drainage plan which will not impact the abutting properties. Mr. Runice welcomed meeting with Mr. Donnay. Kitty O'Dea, 4510 Bruce Avenue commented that she too liked the plans for the replacement home and was happy to see a detached garage. However, she did question the front setback of the home which while meeting the average of the homes on either side; the front stoop extends in front of the neighboring homes. Ms. O'Dea pointed out that she believes a consistent front setback along the street is important. Mr. Nelson responded to Ms. O'Dea explaining that the home cannot be positioned further back on the lot because maneuvering space on the driveway would be lost. Chair Carr thanked Mr. Nelson and Mr. Donnay for presenting their proposed plan for new construction which was well received from the Board. Mr. Donnay commented that he had taken notes during the discussion and would take comments made into consideration as they prepare their final plan for presentation at the July HPB meeting. B. Consultant Vogel Reports 1. Southdale Center — Determination of Eligibility for Heritage Landmark Designation Consultant Vogel provided the Board with a report that analyzed the heritage preservation status of the Southdale Shopping Center to assist them in evaluating the subject property's eligibility for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark, pursuant to City Code §850.20. The technical analysis consisted of a 5 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 12, 2012 review of relevant historical records and a series of site visits. Evaluation of the subject property's historical significance and integrity applied the eligibility criteria of the Edina Heritage Landmark overlay zoning within the local historic context, "Southdale: Shopping Mall Culture," in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth in the Heritage Preservation chapter of the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Vogel explained that the Southdale Shopping Center has been evaluated as historically significant and should be included in the city's inventory of heritage resources worthy of consideration in community development planning. For planning purposes, the heritage resource should be classified as a historic site, encompassing the shopping center building and appurtenant structures, as well as the parking lots and associated landscape features. It is recommended that the HPB issue a determination of Edina Heritage Landmark eligibility for the site. Member Stegner welcomed Mr. Vogel's report noting that the HPB has struggled with recognizing the significance of Southdale Center for over twenty years. Mr. Stegner then moved to issue a determination of eligibility for heritage landmark designation for the center. Member Davis seconded the motion. Discussion ensued among the Board regarding the impact the determination of eligibility would have on Southdale. Mr. Vogel pointed out that unlike the actual landmark designation of a property which requires a property owner's approval; the determination that a property would be eligible for designation is a step that the HPB may take without the property owner's buy -in. Member Stegner opined that by issuing the determination of eligibility for Southdale, the HPB is identifying the center as a historically significant property in the city. He added that the HPB and Edina Historical Society have been grappling with how to recognize the historical importance of Southdale as the first enclosed, climate controlled shopping center in the country for decades, yet there have never been findings identifying the significance of the property. Now, with the determination of eligibility that Mr. Vogel has prepared, the historical significance of the shopping center is substantiated. Consultant Vogel added that by issuing the determination of eligibility for Southdale, the Minnesota State Historic Preservation (SHPO) office is alerted to the historic significance of the property as well. Chair Carr questioned the wisdom of issuing the determination of eligibility for Southdale at this time without knowing that the City Council would support such a decision. She pointed out that the City has been in negotiations with the owners of the property, and she would be more comfortable knowing the Council supported the eligibility determination. Responding to a question regarding their opinions on the significance of Southdale Center, the Board provided the following responses: • Member Moore pointed out that Southdale is a big part of Edina's history; as well as the history of the region. It has been on the HPB's radar screen for 30 -40 years and a decision needs to be made. He added that he is most passionate about ensuring that Harry Bertolia's tree sculpture in the Garden Court is preserved. • Member Mellom observed that the building has changed so much that she was unsure it would qualify for designation; however the original art pieces should be recognized. • 'Member Chriatiaansen stated that she needed to know more about the process - pointing out that she has seen how other malls have died over time; and if a potential designation stifled 0 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 12, 2012 Southdale's development, that could be detrimental to the mall's health. However, she added that she would be in favor of preserving original artwork — perhaps partnering with other groups such as the Edina Public Art Committee: Member Curran stated that she would not be in favor of designating the building; however would like to see the remaining original elements preserved. Member Sussman pointed out that the original exterior and . interior spaces of Southdale are unrecognizable from what stands today. He added that he does not agree that the mall would qualify for landmark designation; however he "could support the designation of original artistic objects. Members Stegner and Davis agreed that they would support designating Southdale Center as a historic cultural resource. Several Board members requested that prior to the HPB taking any action on this item, Planner Repya discuss, the matter with City Manager Scott Neal to ensure that such a decision would be well received by the City Council. Member Moore pointed out that the Edina Historical Society sent Manager Neal a letter in which they expressed their desire to have Southdale Center's history recognized — so this topic shouldn't come as a surprise to him. Member Stegner then agreed to table his motion until the July meeting when Ms. Repya could report on her meeting with Mr. Neal. Board members agreed they were comfortable- with that approach. No formal action was taken. 2. West Minneapolis Heights Survey Consultant Vogel advised the Board that part of his 2012 work plan includes conducting a survey of heritage resources in the West Minneapolis Heights neighborhood. The West Minneapolis Heights Project was identified as one of the city's highest priority strategic planning goals in the heritage preservation element of the 2008 comprehensive plan because background knowledge suggested that important historic properties are likely to be concentrated in this part of the city, which was developed at an early date. He pointed out that the purpose of the survey is to gather data on the neighborhood's. heritage resources. It includes field survey (i.e., the physical search for and recording of historic buildings) but also includes planning and background research before field survey begins, organization and presentation of survey data as the survey proceeds, and development of an inventory of resources which meet established criteria for historic significance and integrity. Background research began in January, 2012 with a literature search and records review that has focused on developing a neighborhood historic context based .on theme, geographical. area, and time period. The historic context will ,provide, the framework ; for organizing information - about the neighborhood's physical development and historic character; it will 'also_guide the field survey by helping to determine whether identified properties meet defined criteria of historical and architectural significance. Mr. Vogel reported that thus far we know that West Minneapolis Heights "was one of the earliest (if not the first) suburban residential subdivisions in Edina, which incorporated as a municipal village in order to control this type of development activity. The neighborhood (which comprises an area of approximately 12 -block area in the northwestern corner of the city.) was platted in 1887 by Charles P. Silloway to take advantage of the development opportunities afforded by .the opening of the Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company plant alongside the Minneapolis & St. Louis RR in West Minneapolis (modern Hopkins). Home building was slow at first and the original development project appears to have failed in the aftermath of the "Panic of 1893" (one of the worst recessions in United States history). The Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 12, 2012 neighborhood was probably built out before the First World War (1914 -18). This part of the city had a longstanding connection with the Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company, which manufactured traction engines, threshing machines, and tractors; in 1929 MTM merged with two other companies to form the Minneapolis - Moline Power Implement Company. Mr. Vogel concluded that the field survey will be conducted in two phases: a reconnaissance or is survey" (driving around the neighborhood and noting the general distribution of older buildings), followed by a detailed pedestrian inspection and documentation of individual properties which appear to meet the Edina Heritage Landmark eligibility criteria. A brief discussion ensued, after which the Board thanked Mr. Vogel for the update and shared that they looked forward to receiving more information as the survey progresses. C. Subcommittee & Working Group Updates 1. Tear Down Trend Subcommittee - Recycling Housing Materials Member Davis explained that he had a discussion with a residential builder who shared that when they are building a new home on a lot with an existing home, rather than tearing the home down, if at all possible, they attempt to move the home to another location. In the event that the home cannot be moved, they then work to recycle as much of the home as possible. He added that he was pleased with that information. Board members agreed with Member Davis pointing out that it is a good idea to explore the current practices relative to recycling housing. materials. Mr. Davis added that as he gathers more information he will share it with the Board at future meetings. 2. Summer Tour— Morningside & Westgate Commercial Area —July 10, 2012 Planner Repya reminded the Board that they had planned the annual summer tour led-by Member Sussman to take the place of the regular July I Oth meeting. Now that the second meeting for the two COA's considered earlier this evening must take place in July, and there would not be sufficient time to complete the tour and transact the required business on the same evening; a new date for the HPB meeting needs to be set. Ms. Repya explained that the Community Room is scheduled every evening; however the City Council Chambers is available on Monday, July 9th or Wednesday, July I Ith. The Board agreed that Monday, July 9th would be the revised date for the July HPB meeting. July 10, 2012 — Summer Tour of Morningside The Board agreed to meet at Kojetin Park on W. 44th Street at 6:30 p.m. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS -None Vill. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Carr stated that she would like to see the following items included on the July meeting agenda: • Planning for the August 6th meeting with the City Council • Mid Century Modern CLG grant update • Recycling of housing materials update • Morningside Bungalow landmark designation update 81 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 12, 2012 Member Stegner added that he would like future discussions of the board to include the following items: • Edina's 125th year celebration in 2013 • Continuing education opportunities • HPB's web site presence Board members then brainstormed potential projects they could undertake in the future, including a presence in the 4th of July parade (probably for 2013); and sharing the City's history at the Centennial Lakes Farmer's Market. IX. STAFF COMMENTS None X. NEXT MEETING DATE — Rescheduled to Monday, July 9, 2012 due to the summer tour occurring on the regular meeting date, Tuesday, July 10th. XI. ADJOURNMENT 9:35 p.m. Member Curran moved the meeting be adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya