Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012-09-04_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA, CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Moment of Silence in Remembrance of Sergeant Steve Stroh II. ROLL CALL Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item, will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of August 21, 2012, Closed Session of August 31, 2012 and Work Session Of August 21, 2012, B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 08/23/2012, TOTAL $2,627,315.25 And Per Pre -List Dated 08/30/12 TOTAL $947,714.27 C. Resolution No. 2012 -100 Setting the Hearing Dates for Special Assessments & Utility Certification (10/2/2012) D. Set 2013 Budget and Levy Hearing and Budget and Levy Adoption Meeting E. Resolution No. 2012 -101 Changing The Precinct Boundaries Between Precincts 2 & 3 F. Traffic Safety Report of August 1, 2012 G. Request For Purchase 2011 -2012 Watermain and Service Roadway Repairs H. Request to Waive Building Permit Fee for Hornet's Nest Project V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Constitution Week Proclamation Agenda/Edina City Council September 4, 2012 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Site Plan, Bruce Carlson, 7501 France Avenue, Build A Free - standing Coffee Shop With A Drive -thru, Resolution No. 2012 -108 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING —Conditional Use Permit, Paul And Kristen Commers, 4710 Golf Terrace, Allow First Floor Elevation Of More Than One Foot Above The Existing First Floor Elevation, Resolution No. 2012 -109 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2012 -107 Adopting Preliminary 2013 Tax Levy And Operating Budget B. Resolution No. 2012 -106 Accepting Various Donations C. Ordinance No. 2012 -17 Amending Chapter 14 of Edina Code Concerning Bicycle Lanes (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) D. Sketch Plan Review 6500 France Avenue Tues Tues Wed Wed Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Mon Tues Fri Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda /Edina City Council September 4, 2012 Page 3 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Advisory Boards & Commission Correspondence: 1. Minutes— Edina Transportation Commission, July 19, 2012 2. Minutes— Human Rights & Relations Commission, July 24, 2012 3. Minutes— Planning Commission, July 25, 2012 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. - SCHEDULEJ UPCOMING: MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Sept 4 Joint Meeting With Planning Commission 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sept 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sept 19 Work Session — Board & Commissions Work Plan Proposals 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sept 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 2 Work Session — CIP Workshop 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 16 Work Session — Art Center Study /Business Meeting 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 5 Work Session — Human Services Funding/Liquor Ordinance 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 6 ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7:00 A.M. until 8:00 P.M. Nov 9 Canvass of Election Returns 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 12 VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Nov 20 Work Session — Finalize 2013 Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 4 Work Session — Name Your Neighborhood 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 18 Work Session — Park Brd Work Group Donation /Naming Policy 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 21, 2012 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. It. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member t-' Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague Be ennBe�tt, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.J., RJM Construction Management Services Contract, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of August 6, 2012 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the -Check Register dated August 9, 2012, and consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $130,491.92; Working Capital Fund $31,849.11; Art Center Fund $10,585.64; Golf Dome Fund $277.90; Aquatic Center Fund $15,669.74; Golf Course Fund $21,646.63; Ice Arena Fund $28,126.61; Edinborough Park Fund $3,629.11; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $6,606.40; Liquor Fund $239,897.08; Utility Fund $457,977.25; Storm Sewer, Fund $18,800.49; PSTF Agency Fund $41218.89; Payroll Fund $3,465.49; TOTAL $973,242.26 and for approval of payment of claims dated August 16, 2012, and consisting of. 22 pages; General Fund $434,429.90; Police Special Revenue. $8,044.93; Working Capital Fund $141,479:84; Art Center Fund $1,035.08; Aquatic Center Fund $17,711.48; Golf Course Fund $48,049.31; Ice Arena Fund $210,095.69; Edinborough Park Fund $1;453.71; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $13,716.46; Liquor Fund $208;404.30; Utility Fund.$93,191.36, Storm Sewer Fund $28,821.50; Recycling Fund $39,958.20; PSTF Agency Fund_ $12,676.38; TOTAL 1,259,069.08; and, Credit Card Transactions dated June 25 — July 25, 2012; TOTAL $23,282.23 IV.C. Approve Appointments. to the 2012 Human Services Task Force:— Art Center 'Board: Hafed Bouiassida, Barbara LaValleur, , and Ray Meifert;, Enerey & Environment Commission: Bob Gubrud; Heritage Preservation Board: Colleen Curran; Human Rights -& Relations Commission: Russ Stanton; and, Transportation Commission: Ann Braden IV.D. Request for Purchase.- 2012 Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Software House International at $40,824.57 IV.E.. Request for Purchase — Weber Park Basketball Court Renovation,- awarding the bid to the recommended low'bidder, Finley Bros., Inc.: at $24,736.00 IV.F. Approve SGN /Wendel Architect / Engineering Services for the Countryside Park shelter buildings at $27,600.00 plus reimbursable expenses for actual printing and delivery costs IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -104, Findings of Fact, 4§24. Bruce Avenue Appeal Certificate of Appropriateness V.H. Request for Purchase - Gallagher Drive and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements — Contract No. ENG 12 -8, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $353,132.60 IV.I. Reject Bids — Raw Water Main Piping — Contract No. PIN 12 -2 b Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 21, 2012 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.I. RIM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT —APPROVED Manager Neal explained the construction manager would assist with the insurance settlement and in creating a project budget. At this time, it was expected the project would generally be within the amount of the insurance settlement. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve the RJM Construction Management Services Contract at a not -to- exceed amount of $21,183 per month. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. JAN CALLISON, HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONER —REPORT RECEIVED Commissioner Callison updated the Council relating to Hennepin County's budget and constituent needs, and announced the retirement of Hennepin County Administrator Richard Johnson and the resignation of Medical Center CEO Dr. Art Gonzalez. Commissioner Callison then provided statistics on the Southdale and Grandview Libraries and advised of delays at the County's Service Center as a result of budget cuts. She stated the County added temporary security to Southdale Court and reviewed studies underway related to how those types of costs could be funded. Commissioner Callison and Council discussed the Library and Service Center services and funding for France and York Avenues improvements. The Council commented on the importance of maintaining a local court and thanked Commissioner Callison for representing the interests of Edina. V. B. IMAGES OF EDINA PHOTO CONTEST WINNERS PRESENTATION Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach introduced the 2012 Images of Edina Photo Contest parameters and announced award winners as follows: "Morning Glory Love" by Lori Anne Yang in the "Living: People" category; "Singing in the Rain" by Denis Plaster in the "Living: People" category; "Young Photographer" by Anne Girton in the "Learning" category; "Sunset Swing" by Megan Norman in the "Raising Families" category; "Creek Valley Water Tower" by Lisa Hafey in the "Doing Business" category; and, "Stay Back" by Ty Dowda in the "Readers' Choice" category. Mr. Gilgenbach announced the "Best of Show" category was awarded to "Singing in the Rain" by Denis Plaster. Mayor Hovland presented the awards and congratulated each recipient. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIL REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VILA. RESOLUTION NOS. 2012 -94 AND 2012 -95 ADOPTED — EDINA EMERALD ENERGY PROGRAM (EEEP): APPLICATION APPROVED, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFIED, REVENUE BOND ISSUED Environmental Engineer Bintner recommended approval of the France at 50th LLC application requesting $39,308 of property assessed financing for energy efficiency improvements for a $50,000 energy retrofit to install LED lighting and a smart control system for a restaurant cooking hood at Salut Bar Americain. He indicated over the long term the interest percentage should cover the City's costs. If approved, the total assessment levied against the property would be $40,030 for a term of five years at 7.5% beginning 2013. Mr. Neal indicated the program details were established by the Council and it could determine whether the interest rate spread should be changed or to increase the application fee. He stated staff was becoming more familiar with the process and could monitor the City's costs. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 21, 2012 Jeremy Kalin, Eutectics Consultant LLC, chief author of PACE legislation, stated this was considered an historic deal because it was the first PACE - assessed project funded by a non - California source as well as the first time a non - private equity fund had come into play. The Council considered whether it should make the program more attractive. by lowering the interest percentage by 1% or amortize the 2% interest over time. Mr. Kalin stated the program would continue to be tweaked and they would negotiate with the investor network to assure the PACE program remained marketable. He extended his appreciation to Senator Franken's staff for its assistance and advised that Bremer Bank, a community- focused bank, was meeting its mission and its community reinvestment act score would be improved as a result of financing this project. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -94, authorizing issuance and sale of $40,030 EEEP Special Assessment Revenue Bond Series 2012B (taxable), fixing, the form and specifications thereof, providing for its execution and delivery, and providing for its. payment; and adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -95, approving agreement and adopting assessment. Member Swenson seconded the motion. The Council further discussed the interest percentage and whether it could be lowered by 1% and still cover the City's costs. Mr. Kalin advised there was a .good payback for the business through energy savings so there had been no resistance to 2% spread. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. B. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY REVISION —APPROVED Finance Director Wallin presented revisions to the Special Assessment Policy as directed by the Council and recommended approval. The Council noted the policy included the use of franchise fees to fund sidewalk, trails and lighting costs; however, franchise fees had not yet been formally adopted. Mr. Neal advised of the franchise fee collection cycle, noting the final assessment hearings would be in 60 days but franchise fee revenue would not be collected for 180 days. Following discussion, the Council indicated it fees would be presumptive to designate use of franchise fees prior to it being formally adopted; The Council agreed to strike the last sentence of the section titled ;'Allocated Costs" and agreed to reconsider the funding of sidewalks, trails and lighting as improvements to the city's non - motorized transportation network once franchise fees were adopted and agFee t ^ E Member Bennett raised and the Council discussed the need-to formally address how REUs were calculated for multi -unit buildings, schools, and parks to assure it fairly .measured the impact on roads. Mr. Neal indicated this matter would be addressed in a separate supportive policy. In the interest of assuring consistency and providing clarity, +ed Member Bennett urged that staff evaluate the impact on the City and property owners paying assessments to include in the allocated, not assessable, costs P-Fejeet Gest, the replacement of the sewer line section from the sewermain to the right -of- way, - similar to the formula used for the water line from the watermain to the shutoff valve. The Council acknowledged that it had been determined G11 ^" ^ " ° ^ ^0 thi at replacement of the sewer line from the sewer main to each house was not a feasible option because it would quickly drain the Utility Fund. Consensus was reached that staff would assure better timed communication with property owners to be assessed relating to the option of taking the City's bid or to undertake a private, contract for upgrade of the water /sewer line from the main to the house. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by. Member Sprague, to approve the Special Assessment Policy, as revised with the last sentence of Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 21, 2012 "Allocated Costs" struck. to stril.e the last sentence of Paragraph 1 indiieatft* "These Eests- wea;a be paid fFGF . new Fevenue SGURes Utility fFaRGh*- .e fees .2 The Council further discussed the language of the policy and asked questions of staff. Member Bennett reiterated her request that staff provide information on" before "the impact. On hew to derere"ine the impae to utility rates including the cost to replace the sewer service line from the main to the property line, in the allocated costs similar to the current allocation of the water line costs. Mr. Neal indicated staff would provide that cost information for Council review. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. DONATIONS POLICY REVISION —TABLED TO DECEMBER 18, 2012 Ellen Jones, Park Board Member and Chair of the Donations Policy Working Group, described its process to address the Donations Policy, thanking all who were involved. Ms. Jones presented its recommendation that the City replace the two existing Donations Policies with the proposed Donations Policy dated May 8, 2012; to develop a Citywide uniform donation application and agreement form signed by the City and donor; and, to create new sponsorship and advertisement policy. Ms. Jones stated additional recommendations were to develop a donations pamphlet, a master plan showing where donated items could be placed, enhance volunteer programs to increase donations, and evaluate standardized and enhanced ways to recognize donors of goods and services. Bob Kojetin, Donations Policy Working Group, stated the intent of the booklet he prepared was to create a record to preserve information on those making donations. He indicated the booklets were available at the Park and Recreation Department and Historical Society Museum. The Council indicated it would like additional time to review the information just received and hold a Work Session discussion with the Donations Policy Working Group as well as the Naming and Dedication of City Facilities Policy Working Group. 'Member Bennett requested that, prior to the Work Session, there be an administrative review to assure iPrier *e the We* Sessie.. the !`e..e..iI requested an aadMieirtratoy° #assure consistency with current policies and sharing of suggested edits with the intent of holding a substantive discussion to advance the policies. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to table consideration of the Donations Policy revision to the December 18, 2012, Council Work Session. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. D. NAMING AND DEDICATION OF CITY FACILITIES POLICY— TABLED TO DECEMBER 18, 2012 Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Brindle, to table consideration of the Naming and Dedication of City Facilities Policy to the December 18, 2012, Council Work Session. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. E. USER FEE RECOMMENDATIONS PQ1 X —APPROVED Keeya Steel, Chair of the Park Board and User Fee Policy Working Group, presented its evaluation of the current per participant user fee for youth athletic associations with f'ein't• use and WSt re,.e..epf. Ms. Steel then presented the recommendations of the Working Group for a per participant fee; for staff to determine and provide to the Park Board variable maintenance costs, staffing costs, capital improvement needs, and in -kind donations per association; that per participant user fee increases take effect the following fiscal year and not be raised two consecutive years in a row; for priority use athletic associations to submit a financial reporting form developed by the City; for priority use athletic associations to report the percent of Edina residents participating in their association; creation of a third priority use document for Braemar Area; to recognize Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club (BCLFSC) and Edina Hockey Page 4 -0 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 21, 2012 Association (EHA) as priority use youth associations; to exempt associations that exclusively use enterprise facilities from the per participant user fee because they pay competitive hourly fees to use those facilities; and, that City staff monitor and report tournament costs separately from regularly scheduled events. Ms. Steel raised two discrepancies resulting from the revision of the Priority Use of the Edina Aquatic Center Facility Policy and the Relationship Document relating to providing an exception to team eligibility for the Swim Club; and, that the Edina Basketball Association functions like the Edina Baseball Association providing house and travelling leagues for all ages. However, Edina Girls Athletic Associations also offer house league basketball, conflicting with the "one youth athletic association per sport rule." Director of Parks Keprios explained that a surcharge fee had been imposed for the life of the bonds needed to improve the East Arena. That surcharge fee had been reinstated for the Hornet's Nest project. ;Member Sprague stated The / Re-un ^01 ^larif: ^d that the EHA wasa recognized association and would have top priority use. The BCLFSC was a long -term tenant, but the Council would not equate the BCLFSC on the same level as the resident association. Mr..-Keprios stated he had recommended striking the exemption of the BCLFSC from the residency requirement, thinking it should, not be exempt.. He indicated staff was drafting a new policy for priority use of Braemar Arena on the basis that no priority group should be exempt from the residency requirement. Once completed, that policy would be presented for Council consideration. It was noted the residency percentage was at the Council's purview. Ms. Steel confirmed `hat the BCLFSC has not previously been recognized as a priority use youth association and does not appear in any relationship documents." Ms Steel ^^.,fiFFned that the Qr1 [Cr had no PF,,eFity . and dAp . The Council discussed the issue of cost recovery and possible push back by associations that do not understand the cost to provide priority or dedicated uses. It was indicated that while the Council does not expect 100% cost recovery, it does support increase in user fees (possibly matching inflation) on a timelier basis. The Council considered whether it was feasible to collect cost data for the next year to undertake a cost analysis. Mr. Keprios stated the data could be collected but there were considerable variables and it would be labor intensive. The Council indicated it would be beneficial to collect the data for the purpose of having discussion and making an informed decision on the user fee level; however, such data would not need to be collected annually. Ms. Steel reported the athletic associations had a sense of unity and did not want to be.treated differently. Mr. Kojetin stated another consideration was the worth of athletic association and school district programming to the City of Edina. The Council acknowledged that the standard of park facilities had increased over the years and strong athletic programming was attractive to Edina's.residents: The Council indicated support for the Working Group's recommendations noting, however, they did not constitute a policy. &t .,,,+ dr-afted in elirw f,,.m t Mr. Keprios and the Council stated its appreciation to the Working Group for addressing these challenging .issues. Member Bennett- made a. motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to. approve the User Fees Working Group recommendations with the following revisions: "1. Per participant user fee, a. �N4e We support the current...;" l.b. "We recommend staff anRually desument collect variable maintenance costs...;" and, "3. Youth athletic associations that use enterprise facilities, a. Since a second priority use document was recently created for the Edina Aquatic Center, we recommend creating a third priority use document for Braemar Arena. This d-a-c-ument should- reGegnize BFaemw Gity of Lakes FigWe Skating Club as PAGFity use youth This document would include..." Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. F. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-98 ADOPTED -ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 21, 2012 Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2012 -98 accepting various donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.G. ALLOCATION OF 2011 GENERAL FUND UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE —APPROVED Mr. Neal presented a recommendation to allocate $380,000 of the 2011 General Fund Undesignated Fund Balance, which left $1,262,395 (76% of the balance). Mr. Neal answered questions of the Council and stated he was not recommending buying down the levy for next year because it was one -time money and would result in a bigger disparity between what was spent and what was taxed. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve the allocation of 2011 General Fund undesignated fund balance as follows: Technology Upgrades - $140,000; Building and Infrastructure Upgrades - $140,000; and, Employee Vacation Time Buyout - $100,000. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. VIII. B. ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE. 1. MINUTES — ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, JUNE 12, 2012 2. MINUTES —HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, JULY 9, 2012 3. MINUTES — PARK BOARD, JULY 10, 2012 4. MINUTES — VETERAN'S MEMORIAL COMMITTEE — MAY 18, 2012 Informational; no action required. IX. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received IX.A. WEST 58' STREET— REFERRED TO EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to request the Edina Transportation Commission to provide recommendation on potential safety improvements of West 581h Street considering safe crosswalks to the park, stop signs at the bottom of the hill, and identifiable speed signs. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. X. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received Xl. CLOSED SESSION — SALLY LANE AND VALLEY VIEW ROAD TREE LITIGATION City Attorney Knutson advised of circumstances under which the Council could meet in closed session. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to recess the meeting at 10:40 p.m. and move to executive session to address the Sally lane and Valley View Road tree litigation. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. XII. ADJOURNMENT The regular session reconvened at 11:20 p.m. Member Swenson made a motion to adjourn the regular session at 11:20 p.m. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 21, 2012 Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 4, 2012. Video Copy of the August 21, 2012, meeting available. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 7 MINUTES OF THE CLOSED MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUUGUST 21, 2012 10:40 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 10:40 p.m. in the Community Room of Edina City Hall. He announced the purposed of the closed session was to allow the City Council to discuss an issue regarding trees at Valley View Road and Sally Lane with the City Attorney. Audience members were asked to leave the Council's Chambers. Staff members were excused from the room. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff members present included Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Assistant City Engineer and Scott Neal, City Manager. The Council asked questions of staff regarding the status of trees in the City's right -of -way on Valley View Road and Sally Lane. Staff provided answers. Attorney Knutson gave his guidance on possible methods to resolve the issue. The Council gave staff direction to proceed to resolution. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague to adjourn the close session and reconvene the regular meeting at 11:20 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 4, 2012. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA SCHOOL BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 21, 2012 S:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. in the. Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Bennett entered the meeting at 5:07 p.m. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL DISTRICT MEETING Edina School Board Members attending the meeting were With Almog, Regina Neville, Cathy Cella, and Lonni Skrentner. Edina School District Staff attending were: Ric Dressen, Superintendent; Val Burke, Director of Community Education Services; Randy Smasal, Director of Teaching & Learning; Susan Brott, Director of Communications & Community Engagement; and Margo Bauck, Director of Business Services.. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Ann Kattreh, Assistant Park & Recreation Director; John Keprios, Park and Recreation Director; Ad Klugman, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Jeff Long, Police Chief; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; Cary Teague, Director of Community Development. Manager Neal briefly reviewed the residential redevelopment that has occurred and areas that further redevelopment might occur within the City of Edina. Two multi - family housing sites, near Southdale and near Byerly's were discussed. The potential impact of multifamily housing on the school district's population was discussed. Manager Neal and Superintendent Dressen updated the Council and Board on various projects and issues ongoing within the City of Edina. These included: movement of a segment of Edina residents to petition away from SD270 into SD273, GrandView Small Area Framework, razing of old Edina Public Works site, new Edina Economic Development Staff member Bill Neuendorf, School District Facility Study nearing completion, and the future of the Edina Schools Transportation Facility. Edina School District and City staff gave updates and answered .questions about Hart hip goals. shared facilities. and public safety Mayor Hovland thanked the Edina School Board and staff for the valuable opportunity to share ideas. The Edina School Board and staff left the meeting at 6:13 p.m. 2013 BUDGET PROCESS Edina staff members Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director and John Wallin, Finance Director, joined the meeting. Mr. Roggeman presented briefly the proposed process for development of the 2013 Operating Budget. It was noted that during 2012 the first two -year budget had been adopted so really in 2013 the Operating Budget was just being adjusted to reflect necessary changes. Staff submitted approximately 30 potential changes to the 2013 Operating Budget. Of the submitted changes about half were being incorporated. Some changes were due to staff reorganization and Council approved changes to several funds and departments. Some nontax Minutes - Work Session /Edina City Council /August 21, 2012 General Fund revenue projections had been revised upward to reflect strength of local economic recovery. Finally there was a proposed reallocation of the annual liquor fund transfer to provide more consistent Capital Improvement Program financing. The unknowns that may affect the 2013 Budget included: the final result of the compensation study project; bargaining unit negotiations, health insurance city contribution and the Art Center study recommendation. The 2013 Tax Levies were projected to be at approximately 2.57% over the 2012 levies. The changes and increases would support the Capital Improvement. and Equipment Replacement program which currently have structural imbalance between revenue and expenditures. €UtUFe �-o„sWerat�oRS that- Reed to be <ok«R ;Rte 6ensideratien were also- dise�ssed_. Council discussion included parks maintenance budget, park dedication fees, equipment replacement and lifespans and other considerations. Member Swenson supported an additional park maintenance position to allow full staffing of neighborhood ice rinks; Member Bennett asked that the city be as assertive as possible under State law in charging park dedication fees; and Member Sprague requested that any 2013 levy increase be held to less than 2 %. Member Bennett supported that request Staff briefly reviewed the timeline for the 2013 Budget and CIP project which included: • September 4 Adopt preliminary budget • September 12 Staff review of CIP Priorities • October 2 City Council review of CIP Priorities • November 5 Public Hearing— CIP • November 20 Adopt final CIP • December 4 Public hearing— Operating budget and levy • December 18 Adopt final budget The Council briefly discussed the proposed 2013 Operating Budget, Levy, and CIP process and gave direction to staff for the preparation. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 21, 2012. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 1 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING WM-473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY POOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 8/23/2012 - 8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account, Description 362498 812312012 101833 A.T.O.M. 125.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 294992 46614599 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 125.00 362499 812312012 125196 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN 119.33 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 294993 081312 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 119.33 362500 8123/2012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 474.24 UB TEMP 294799 36047505 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 474.24 362501 812312012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 1 66.80 295144 1603528 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 150.80 295145 1603522 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 217.60 362602 8123/2012 129469 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. 15,026.29 WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONSTR 294800 37261263 05473.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 15,026.29 362503 812312012 100576 ALL SAFE INC. 41.21 EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION OOOOFIRE 294994 115780 5861.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 41.21 294995 115781 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38.94 294996 115782 5821.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38.94 EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION 295078 115618 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 160.30 362604 812312012 100666 AMSAN 395.56 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001799 294801 270900160 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 395.56 362505 812312012 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 819.25 EARPIECES 00003765 295079 31089 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 819.25 362506 812312012 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 39.00 POTATO SALAD 294802 1780094 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 911.82 FOOD 294803 1780095 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 432.66 FOOD 295080 1780267 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,383.48 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 1 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING WM-473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY POOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 2 8/23/2012 - 8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Pb # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362507 812312012 118491 APPLE COMPUTER INC. 881.03 IPAD 00004352 294886 9158369783 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 634.30 IDPADS 00004352 294887 4200059408 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 634.30 IDPADS 00004352 294887 42110059408 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 2,149.63 362508 812312012 116061 ARAMARK 289.61 COFFEE 294888 915268 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 458.76 COFFEE 294889 1031824 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 748.37 362509 812312012 130718 - AUTO -OWNERS INSURANCE CORVEL 1,444.30 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 295243 AMELIA 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SOETEDIER -PADEN 1,444.30 362510 812312012 120995 AVR INC. 894.54 READY -MIX 00005242 294804 65617 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 616.67 294805 65743 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 977.91 294806 66156 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,566.79 294807 66251 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,344.49 294808 66468 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 561.09 294809 66074 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,566.79 294810, 66546 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 672.24 294811 66712 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 8,200.52 362511 812312012 100638 BACHMAN'S 451.60 TREES 00006328 294997 41404/1 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 433.54 TREES 00006320 294998 41160/1 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 885.14 362512 812312012 130702 BARKLEY, TRAVIS 400.00 JR GOLF LESSONS 294890 081312 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 400.00 362513 812312012 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 1,176.42 LEGAL SERVICES 294999 103769 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,176.42 362514 812312012 102608 BAVARIAN MUSIKMEISTERS, THE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8122112 294983 080112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 8121/26._ X4:00:34 Page- 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS GENERAL'SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING ENGINEERING GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8/2312012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 150.00 362515 812312012 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 757.31 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 00008068 295081 00090022 5521.6406 757.31 362516 812312012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 130.61 294935 87175200 5842.5515 39.00- ,295146 87159600 5842.5515 91.61 362517 812312012 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 130.00 COFFEE, CAPPUCCINO 295082 1033989 5520.5510 130.00 362518 812312012 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 102.28 LAMINATING POUCHES 294891 WO- 788871 -1 1550.6406 168.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 294892 WO- 789641 -1 1550.6406 84.22 LABELS .294893 WO- 790265 -1 1550.6406 698.47 RECYCLING CONTAINERS 295000 OE- 294267 -1 7411.6406 34.01 LABELING 00003060 295001 WO- 789775 -1 _ 1400.6513 20.65 WALL HOOKS 295233 WO- 789602 -1 1190.6406 8.86 FLUORESCENT BULB 295234 WO- 790189 -1 1190.6406 1,117.30 362519 812312012 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 33.52 PADLOCKS 00001850 294812 S78966 1646.6406 33.52 362520 8123120.12 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 20.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 295003 79348 1646.6406 59.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 295003 79348 1552.6406 66.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 295003 79348 1260.6406 68.38- CREDIT 295004 5571CM 1646.6406 219.00 LABELING.TAPE 00003854 295083 79551 1470.6406 222.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003848 295084 79325 1470.6406 43.54 RETURN 295085 5587CM 1470.6406 38.19- TAPE 00003848 295086 79372 1470.6406 515.20 362521 812312012 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 20.80 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003815 295087 80827097 147D.6510 8121/26._ X4:00:34 Page- 3 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS GENERAL'SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING ENGINEERING GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 4 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.80 362522 812312012 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 207.06 WIRE AND SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005548 294894 660966 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 247.65 LINK ASSEMBLY, NUTS 00005550 295002 661539 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 454.71 362523 812312012 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/21/12 294981 080112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 362524 8/2312012 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 30.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 295261 082012 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30.00 362525 8123/2012 123615 CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT INC. 9,546.08 GOOSE MANAGEMENT 00001040 294813 2012030 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 9,546.08 362526 812312012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 4,688.90 294936 144354 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 94.35 294937 144355 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 968.15 294938 144353 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 155.80 295239 143819 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5,907.20 362527 812312012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 375.66 295147 94135 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 375.66 362528 812312012 129923 CAWLEY 47.75 NAME BADGES 294814 V114428 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 47.75 362629 812312012 101615 CEMSTONE PhODUCTS CO. 251.75 DIAMOND BLADE 00001097 295088 1286973 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 251.75 362530 812312012 100697 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 12.82 295005 080312 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 19.74 295005 080312 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 22.25 295005 080312 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA 8/2112012 14:00:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - - 5 8123/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22,79 295005 080312 5430.6186 HEAT , RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 22,81 295005 080312 - 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 40.51 295005 080312 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 45.96 295005 080312 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 45.96 295005 080312 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 72.41 295005 080312 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING - 74.88 295005 080312 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 80.22 295005 080312 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 89.47 295005 080312 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 160.70 295005 080312 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 252.39 295005 080312 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 818.61 295005 080312 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 1,993.15 295005 080312 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,774.67 362531 812312012 103711- CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN - 420.31 295089 2443582- 57 20.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,110.52 295090 2444052 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 3,530.83 362632 8123/2012 123898 CENTURYLINK 109.80 952 835 -1161 294898 1161 -8/12 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 211.04 952 835 -6661 294899 666148/12 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 159.61 952 285 -2951 294900 2951 -8/12 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 480.45 362533 812312012 117187- CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 111.15 MARVALOSA CLEANER 295091 517161 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 111.15 - 362534 812312012 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 255.00 294939 479927 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 94.95 294940. 479658 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD, BEER VERNON SELLING 349.95. 362536 812312012 110669. CHOICE,MARKETING INC. 141.95 TRADING CARDS 294895 20120729 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. POLICE DEPT. GENERAL, 141.95 362636 812312012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 4,196.22 00103426 - 0345052006 295092 345052006 -8/12 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,196.22 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/2312012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362637 812312012 100889 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 3,228.50 SCBA EQUIPEMENT 00003856 295228 145506 1470.6406 3,228.50 362538 8/2312012 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page- 6 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 165.20 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 295148 0188085823 5862.5515 ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 165.20 362539 812312012 120433 COMCAST 4.52 294896 23973.8/12 1551.6103 66.95 8772 10 614 0419858 295093 419858 -8/12 5511.6188 90.44 8772 10 614 0220686 295094 220686 -8/12 5710.6105 161.91 362540 812312012 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 3,792.81 CHAIN SAWS - SOT 00003834 295231 51701 1470.6406 3,792.81 362541 812312012 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 1,153.89 CLAY 00009066 295095 INV000070504 5120.5510 1,153.89 362542 8/23/2012 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 109.27 114 - 10014090 -3 294897 07/31 1400.6406 109.27 362543 812312012 104020 DALCO 268.26 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001923 294815 2495355 1646.6406 126.78 TOWELS 00001454 295006 2496015 1552.6406 363.38 TOWEL DISPENSER, TOWELS 00001454 295007 2495139 1552.6406 271.62 TOWELS 00009063 295096 2495131 5111.6511 1,030.04 362644 812312012 102286 DAVANNIS 65.58 TRAINING LUNCH 295008 212565 -C 1400.6104 65.58 362545 8123/2012 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 22.40 294941 663697 5822.5515 1,364.15 294942 663696 5822.5514 66.40 294943 663899 5842.5514 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page- 6 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,729.75 294944 663698 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,314.75 295149 663695 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 160.00 295150 663941 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 110.20 295151 663693 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,767.65 362646 812312012 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 19.95 PLIER SET 00001860 294901 717203 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.95 362547 812312012 130717 DEMONT, RAY 22.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS REFUND. 295246 081512 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 362548 812312012 100720 DENNYS'M AVE. BAKERY 131.73 BAKERY 294816 422170 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 86.67 294817 422173 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 87.47 295009 422506 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 305.87 362549 812312012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 151.20 295098 650487671 -8/12 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 151.20 362650 812312012 102783 DLT SOLUTIONS INC. 17,865.89 AUTO CAD 2013 RENEWAL 00002001 294818 51195916 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING'EQUIPMENT 17,865.89 _ 362551 812312012 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 625.77 FRANCE AVE BULK MAILING -.294819 4913 -01 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 68.56 NEWSLETTER MAILING 285010 4935 -01 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 68.56 NEWSLETTERVAILING 295010 4935-01 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES" YORK SELLING 68.56 NEWSLETTER MAILING 295010 4935 -01 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING " 831.45 362552 812312012 102659 DPD 356.05 CLASS REGISTRATION FORMS 285097 E46964011 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 356.05 362553 812312012 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. " 45.72 MERCHANDISE 294820 483204 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 45.72 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 8 8/23/2012 —8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362664 812312012 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 145.89 JULY WASHES 294821 5158 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 145.89 362555 8/2312012 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 51.00 BUS FEE 294902 120 -076 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND S THEATER 51.00 362556 812312012 100049 EHLERS 438.75 55TH & FRANCE SPECIAL SERVICE 294822 345028 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 1,072.50 TIF REPORTING 294823 345029 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 1,511.25 362557 812312012 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 44.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 285011 081512 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 44.98 362558 812312012 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 310.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003857 295099 1485901 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 310.50 362559 812312012 130604 EUREKA CONSTRUCTION 801.66 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 295250 082412 04388.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRACY AVE 3,890.96 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 295250 082412 03472.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRACY AVE 26,019.19 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 295250 082412 05526.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRACY AVE 34,742.04 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 295250 082412 01368.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON 65,453.85 362660 812312012 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 234.50 294945 125 -1346 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 234.50 362561 812312012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 176.03 ALTERNATOR 00005438 294903 69- 073410 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.69 FILTERS 00005480 295012 69- 075198 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 219.72 362562 812312012 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 720.00 JR GOLF LESSONS 294904 081312 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 720.00 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 8/23/2012 —8/2312012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit < 362563 812312012 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 184,256.18 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 295251 082412 05536.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WATER METER REPLACEMENT 184,256.18 362564 8/2312012 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 3,369.08 WATER RESCUE SUPPLIES 00003832 295229 7603 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,369.08 362565 812312612 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 294824 24654 1260.6103 PROFESSIONALSERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 362566 812312012 100758 FLANAGAN SALES INC. 283.22 PLAYGROUND PARTS 00001730 294825 14342 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 283.22 362667 812312012 101476 FOOTJOY _ 2,782.91 MERCHANDISE 295100 4478172 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 146.82 295101 4488307 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 48.45 NO TAX ON COST OF GOODS SOLD 295102 4504949 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,978.18 362568 8/2312012 129884 FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE C 1,914.90 STD INSURANCE 295013 F018342 -9/12 1550.6200_ INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,914.90 362569 812312012 124265 FOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONM, 2,400.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 295103 30016 5952.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECYCLING 2,400.00 362570 812312012 .102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. _ 19,293.40 FINAL PAYMENT 295252 082412 01101.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 54TH BLVD BEAUTIFICATION 19,293.40 362571 8123/2012 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. , 18.88 REPLACEMENT FILE 295104 1317634 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 18.86 362672 812312012 124641 GEYEN GROUP 133.59 SPOT CLEANING 00006049 294905 22167 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 133.59 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8121/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 10 8123/2012 -8/2312012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362573 612312012 129797 GM CONTRACTING INC. 227,689.86 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 295253 082412 05449.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -449 227,689.86 362574 812312012 101103 GRAINGER 181.54 MEASURING TAPES 00001801 294826 9895391242 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.44 CREDIT 294827 9895205723 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 84.28 HORNET KILLER, LUBE 00005495 294828 9897030616 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 52.77 WASP /HORNET KILLER 00005495 294829 9896570836 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 37.00 PAPER PLATES 00005491 294906 9896570828 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 70.33 LITERATURE RACK 00005491 294906 9896570828 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 71.47 TRIMMER LINE 00006162 295014 9891879190 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 37.81 GLOVES 00006162 295015 9892196446 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 404.95 EASELS 00006048 295016 9895458405 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 153.15 SAW BLADES, GAS CANS 00002059 295017 8877621558 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 208.06 BLADES, RUST INHIBITOR 00002059 295018 9877621541 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 23.49 SHOP SUPPLIES 295019 9901765405 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 1,228.41 362575 812312012 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 462.60 295152 00028874 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 462.60 362576 812312012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 404.75 294946 142613 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,031.25 295153 142729 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,436.00 362577 812312012 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 233.41 LIGHT POLE BASES 00001907 295D20 961799732 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 20.40 TAPE, CEMENT 00001907 295021 961799733 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 253.81 362578 8/2312012 102126 GREG LESSMAN SALES 259.73 GOLF TEES 294830 47717 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 259.73 362679 812312012 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 1,200.00 JR GOLF LESSONS 294907 081312 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,200.00 362680 812312012 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8121/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 11 8/23/2012 - 8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier, /, Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 477.86, KILN REPAIRS 295105 12 -7 -18 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 477.86 CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 141.00 BLACK DIRT 362581 812312012 101964 GUSTAVE_A. LARSON CO. 1643.6543 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 264.01 ' 292.20 MOTOR 00001.837 295022 BLM0150802 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 136.72- CREDIT 295023 BLM0149220 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 155.48 GENERAL STORM SEWER FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING SOD & BLACK DIRT 362582 812312012 PAYROLL CLEARING 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. CENTRAL,SERVICES GENERAL FERTILIZER. CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 141.00 BLACK DIRT 295024 073112 1643.6543 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 264.01 BLACK DIRT, SOD 295024 073112 5932.6543 314.21 MULCH 295024 073112 5761.6540 445.30 BLACK DIRT, SOD 295024 0731.12 5913.6543 1,164.52 362583 8/2312012 125270 HARTFORD - PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 5,258.75 SEPT PREMIUM 295235 5993155 -0 9900.2033.05 6.65 - COBRA 295236 SEPT 2012 1550.6043 5,265.40 362584 812312012 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC. 581.58 BOULDERS 00002082 295025 272234 5761.6540 581.58 362585 8123/2012 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA ,.. 168.50 PIZZA 295026 1715009 5421.5510 168.50 362588 8123/2012 105436_ :HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 4,601.94 RADIO ADMIN FEE 295027 120738015 1400.6151 4,601.94 . - 362587 8123/2012 101271 HINDING, CHRIS . 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/23/12 294985 080112 5760.6136 150.00 362588 812312012 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 423.00 294947 612406 5822.5514 1,138.50 294948 612728 - 5842.5514 1,017.50 295154 612404 5862.5514 2,579.00 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL STORM SEWER FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION LIFE INSURANCE- 99 .:= PAYROLL CLEARING COBRAINSURANCE CENTRAL,SERVICES GENERAL FERTILIZER. CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ' COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 12 8/23/2012 — 8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362589 812312012 102044 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 1,010.54 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 295028 011 - 059 -17 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATH 1,010.54 362590 812312012 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 1,000.70 CAL HYPO, ACID 00002181 295106 12073049 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,000.70 362591 812312012 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 713.53 CONCESSION PRODUCT 295107 1854607 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 159.08 295108 1861649 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 872.61 362592 812312012 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 93.25 PVC, ADAPTERS, COUPLERS 295109 723029 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 115.07 BALL VALVES, PVC ADAPTER 00007150 295110 723076 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 208.32 362693 812312012 130712 INGHAM, SHANNON 100.00 CONSTRUCTION WORK 295111 081312 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 320.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 295111 081312 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 420.00 362594 812312012 123036 INVER HILLS COMMUNITY BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/26/12 294986 080112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 362595 812312012 102640 IPMA -HR 369.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 295029 24183313 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 369.00 362596 812312012 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 5,082.28 SOT PPE 00003833 295230 188929 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,082.28 362597 812312012 100830 JERRY S PRINTING 85.82 LAWN SIGNS 295112 58437 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 85.82 362598 812312012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,186.63 294949 1875826 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 39.05 295155 18758P7 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 8/23/2012 - 8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger - Account Description Business Unit 9,519.40 295156 1875836 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,340.85 295157 1875827 5862.5514 - COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 55.00 295158 1875828 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 326.55 295240 1884693 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 20,467.48 362599 8123/2012 102546 JOHN'S AUTO PARTS 41.78. MIRROR 00005500 294908, 998491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.78 362601 812312012 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 94.11 295159 1368118 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,775.84 295160 1369289 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 420.66 295161 1368415 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD. LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 786.16 295162 1368101 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 114.11 295163 1368104 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 172.24 295164 1368105 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 47.97 295165. 1364410 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 105.54 295166 1368121 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11,239.48 295167 1368122 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,532.06 295168 1368119 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,632.87 295169 1368123 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,793.84 295170 1368117 5862.5512 COST'OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.43 295171 1368100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 438.77 295172 1368120 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 42.52 295173 1368412 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,597.54 295174 1368109 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,592.45 295175 1368111 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,653.01 295176 1368115 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 295177 1368102 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,611.81 295178 1368113 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,458.62 295179 1368110 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 112.99 295180 1368112 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.11 295181 1368114 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 217.24 295182 1368116 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 48,537.49 362602 6123/2012 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 12.74 PETTY CASH 295030 081512 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 21.96 PETTY CASH 295030 081512 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 118.00 PETTY CASH 295030 081512 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 237.28 PETTY CASH 295030 081512 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 14 8/2312012 —8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389.98 362603 812312012 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 59.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 294909 081412 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 59.98 362604 812312012 111018 KEEPRS INC. 142.79 UNIFORMS 00003824 295113 192862 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 142.79 362605 812312012 118635 KREITZER, MARK 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/30/12 294991 080112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 362606 812312012 106546 KRUEGER, DOROTHY 122.00 TRIP REFUND 295245 081312 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 122.00 362607 812312012 129568 KURT, KAREN 1,913.45 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 295244 2012 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 1,913.45 362608 612312012 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 DWI TOW 295031 081412 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 153.74 362609 812312012 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 444.17 PRO LASER REPAIRS 294831 466733 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 444.17 362610 812312012 100824 LABRECHE 2,306.25 COMMUNICATIONS AUDIT 294832 11685 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 2,306.25 362611 8/23/2012 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 660.80 STOP VALVE REPAIR 294833 1700S 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 660.80 362612 812312012 127146 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC. 445.78 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT PARTS 00001787 294834 C14045 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 445.78 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 362617 812312012 101453 LUT4 RICHARD M. CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 263.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 292259 070912 1400.6203 263.97 Council Check Register 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 8/2312012 -8/2312012 1,600.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier /. Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362613 812312012 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 362619 812312012 122878 MARTT, DOROTHEA 327.99 WASHERS, PLUGS, CLAMPS 00005484 294910 9301015758 1553.6530 172 1130.6103 513.95 WASHERS, GROMMETS, SCREWS 00005497 295032 9301028428 1553.6530 362620 812312012 841.94 101483 MENARDS 362614 812312012 LUMBER, SAW BLADES 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 294836 12518 1646.6577 78.01 140.00 00001803 294837 295183 21376 5862.5514 74.84 LUMBER, BOLTS 140.00 294838 9811 1646.6577 39.53 362615 812312012 295037 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 5422.6406 48.91 TAPE, CEMENT 00001919 273.42 CARRIAGE ASSEMBLY 00005426 294911 00049365 1553.6530 00002184 295114 273.42 5720.6556 68.36- RETURN 362616 812312012 5720.6556 101792 LUBE -TECH 67.65 ROUNDUP, FILTERS 00008070 295116 13400 5511.6406 1,396.58 DIESEL 00006143 295033 2083390 5422.6581 650.03 GAS 00006142 295034 2083392 5423.6406 1,028.95 GAS 00006142 295035 2083391 5431.6581 3,075.56 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 362617 812312012 101453 LUT4 RICHARD M. 263.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 292259 070912 1400.6203 263.97 362618 8123/2012 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 1,600.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 295036. 7997 1120.6103 1,600.00 362619 812312012 122878 MARTT, DOROTHEA 240.00 HOSTING FEE 294835 172 1130.6103 240.00 362620 812312012 101483 MENARDS 64.00 LUMBER, SAW BLADES 00001816 294836 12518 1646.6577 78.01 LUMBER, HARDWARE 00001803 294837 11777 1646.6577 74.84 LUMBER, BOLTS 00001800 294838 9811 1646.6577 39.53 WIRE FASTENERS 00006316 295037 8735 5422.6406 48.91 TAPE, CEMENT 00001919 295038 12849 1322.6406 246.04 GLOVES, CHAINS, SAW BLADES 00002184 295114 8982. 5720.6556 68.36- RETURN 295115. 12123 5720.6556 67.65 ROUNDUP, FILTERS 00008070 295116 13400 5511.6406 550.62 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER REPAIR PARTS GASOLINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GASOLINE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL, SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page- 15 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF CARS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE -MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 —8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362621 812312012 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 69.42 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00001804 294842 143101 1642.6406 69.42 362622 812312012 100885 METRO SALES INC 2,587.91 COPIER CONTRACT 294843 472078 1400.6230 143.21 COPIER USAGE 295039 471701 5110.6151 2,731.12 362623 8123/2012 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 18,958.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295254 082412 04386.1705.30 46,962.18 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295254 082412 01387.1705.30 65,920.38 362624 812312012 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 444.86 PARTAIL PAYMENT NO. 6 (FINAL) 295255 081012 1314.6517 1,483.31 PARTAIL PAYMENT NO. 6 (FINAL) 295255 081012 03461.1705.30 1,949.53 PARTAIL PAYMENT NO. 6 (FINAL) 295255 081012 05510.1705.30 8,155.90 PARTAIL PAYMENT NO. 6 (FINAL) 295255 081012 01384.1705.30 19,775.04 PARTAIL PAYMENT NO.6 (FINAL) 295255 081012 04374.1765.30 31,808.64 362625 812312012 130713 MIDWEST UTILITY SERVICES 25,639.00 FINAL PAYMENT 295260 082412 46001.6710 25,639.00 362626 812312012 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,347.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001956 294912 34150 5913.6180 1,347.50 362627 8/2312012 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 510.54 EMULSION 00005493 294841 67669 1301.6519 510.54 362628 812312012 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 17.01 COUPLINGS 295117 0095739 -IN 5311.6406 17.01 362629 812312012 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 175.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/30/12 294990 080112 5760.6136 175.00 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 8121/2012 14:00:34 Page - 16 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SAND GRAVEL & ROCK CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY ESTATES VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RENOVATION SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS ROAD OIL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 8/21/26i2 14:00:34 Page- 17 Subledger' Account Description Business Unit CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 REPAIR PARTS RANGE REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS RANGE Council Check Register " REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 8/23/2012 -8123/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362630 812312012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,357.07 REELS, BEDKNIFE 295040 863249 -00 5422.6530 139.66 PICKER PARTS 00006314 295041 863950 -00 . 5424.6530 - 378.20' SEALS, BEARINGS 00006317 295042 864169 -00 5422.6530 - 204.14 SLEEVES, WASHERS 00006319 295043 864852 -00 5422.6530 1,107.15 REAR AXLE, MOTOR ASSEMBLIES 00006322 295044 865745 -00 5424.6530 61.66 PIN -AXLE 00006322 295045 865753 -00 5422.6530 728.45 MOTOR ASSEMBLIES 00006326 295046 866418 -00 5422.6530 . 3,976.33 362631 812312012 110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC. 302,511.71 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 14 295256 082412 05473.1705.30 302,511.71 362632 612312012 130453, NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 250.00 PRODUCTION SCREEN AD 295232 NCM178117 5310,6122 250.00 362633 812312012 100076`. NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 169.50 294950 75322 5822.5513 511.50 - 294951 75278 5842.5513 543.50 295184 75319 5862.5513 1,224.50 362634 812312012 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. -- 300.00 MANUALS 295047 4468 7410.6218 40.00 ENVELOPES 295048 4469 - 7410.6575 340.00 _ 362635 812312012 104350 .NIKE USA INC. 31.61 MERCHANDISE 295118 943125521 5440.5511 31.61 362636 812312012 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. " 1,805.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295257 082412 03469.1705.30 17,917.62 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295257 082412 01402.1705.30 18,116.58 PARTIAL PAYMENT N0.4 295257 082412 01400.1705.30 18,485.10 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295257 082412 04385.1705.30 20,867.86 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295257 082412 01403.1705.30 27,122.34 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295257 082412 01401.1705.30 92,283.14 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295257 082412 01386.1705.30 196,597.64 8/21/26i2 14:00:34 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODSSOLD WINE VERNON SELLING EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS' - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VIKING HILLS POLAR CIRCLE GLACIER PLACE VIKING HILLS VERNON CT & VERNON HILLS GLEASON COURT VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD Page- 17 Subledger' Account Description Business Unit REPAIR.PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS RANGE REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS RANGE REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 ADVERTISING OTHER. POOL ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODSSOLD WINE VERNON SELLING EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS' - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VIKING HILLS POLAR CIRCLE GLACIER PLACE VIKING HILLS VERNON CT & VERNON HILLS GLEASON COURT VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD R55CKREG LOG20000 COUNTRYSIDE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COUNTRYSIDE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COUNTRYSIDE Council Check Register 8123/2012 —8123/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362637 8123/2012 130141 DENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 324.00 295185 773 5842.5513 324.00 362638 812312012 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 92.78 TONER CARTRIDGE 00002189 295119 619391328001 5710.6513 92.78 362639 812312012 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 333.60 LOAD BINDERS 00001820 294844 501256 5913.6406 333.60 362640 812312012 126729 OMANN BROTHERS PAVING INC. 1,332.00 DRIVEWAY INSTALLATION 294913 22783 01386.1705.21 1,332.00 362641 8/23/2012 116669 ON CALL SERVICES 1,799.60 INDOOR PLAY CONSTR PARTS 295120 2298 5720.6530 1,799.60 362642 812312012 118145 PADDLE WHEELER 65.17 RUDDER 00002089 295049 523 5761.6530 65.17 362643 812312012 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 23,538.17 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 295258 081412 05525.1705.30 235,834.02 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 295258 081412 04387.1705.30 282,964.09 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 295258 081412 01388.1705.30 542,336.28 362644 812312012 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 1,223.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 295259 082412 03468.1705.30 52,595.39 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295259 082412 01385.1705.30 93,066.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295259 082412 04384.1705.30 219,050.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 295259 082412 05522.1705.30 365,934.61 362645 812312012 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 506.50 294952 8362280 -IN 5822.5513 837.00 294953 8362284 -IN 5842.5513 166.25 294954 8362283 -IN 5822.5512 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 18 Business Unit YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION CONSULTING INSPECTION VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS RICHMOND HILLS PK CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS RICHMOND HILLS PK CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS RICHMOND HILLS PK CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COUNTRYSIDE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COUNTRYSIDE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS COUNTRYSIDE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH.ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 362646 812312012 362647 812312012 362648 812312012 362649 812312012 362650 8/2312012 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1093.51 295186 8362263 -IN 5862.5513 2,603.26 5760.6136 5320.5510 5730.5510 5842.5515 5421.5510 7411.6511 7413.6406 7411.6406 7410.6406 7412.6406 7410.6106 5842.5512 5842.5514 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5822.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 296.80 HOSE REPAIR 00006364 295051 51656976.001 5431.6180 296.80 362651 8/23/2012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 138.00 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005481 294914 210015685 1553.6583 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page- 19 Business Unit VERNON SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE POOL CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS YORK SELLING GRILL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF RANGE PSTF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 124366 PEARSON, JACK COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/21/12 294982 080112 200.00 YORK SELLING . COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 237.13 VERNON SELLING 295121 76398610 131.93 295122 76398562 508.00 295187 74094323 1,186.37 295237 76398598 2,064.43 122417 PETTY CASH 1.98 PETTY CASH 295050 081612 3.21 PETTY CASH 295050 081612 3.58 PETTY CASH 295050 081612 4.26 PETTY CASH 295050 081612 20.40 PETTY CASH 295050 081612 25.36. PETTY CASH 295050 081612 58.79 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 4,104.25 295188 2287425 45.99 295189 2287428 1,187.53 295190 2287424 873.92 295191 2287426 1,050.73 295192 2287427 732.38 295193 2287429 271.88 295194 2287420 196.48 295195 2287419 996.16 295196 2287430 850.78 295197 2287431 10,310.10 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 5760.6136 5320.5510 5730.5510 5842.5515 5421.5510 7411.6511 7413.6406 7411.6406 7410.6406 7412.6406 7410.6106 5842.5512 5842.5514 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 5822.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 296.80 HOSE REPAIR 00006364 295051 51656976.001 5431.6180 296.80 362651 8/23/2012 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 138.00 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005481 294914 210015685 1553.6583 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page- 19 Business Unit VERNON SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE POOL CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS YORK SELLING GRILL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF ADMINISTRATION PSTF RANGE PSTF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS TIRES & TUBES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 3,375.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 362654 8123/2012 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 8/23/2012 —812312012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 77.25 264.52 TIRES 00005481 294915 210015343 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 5720.6406 402.52 77.25 362652 812312012 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 67.11 CARBURETOR 00002058 295052 110825 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS 67.11 362663 812312012 100466 PREMIER FENCE INC. UNIFORMS 00003853 8121/2012 14:00:34 Page- 20 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,375.00 INSTALL FENCE 295247 4701 MEADOW RD 01101.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH BLVD BEAUTIFICATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PLAYGROUND & THEATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 620.00 KID N' PLAY PROGRAM 294916 7232 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 620.00 362661 812312012 125936 REINDERS INC. 3,375.00 362654 8123/2012 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 77.25 622833 WATER 295123 080212 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 77.25 362655 812312012 130260 PROFORMA 734.88 UNIFORMS 00003853 295124 OB29003969 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 734.88 362656 812312012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 532.81 ROLL TOWELS, TISSUE 00002092 295053 5729 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.73 CAN LINERS 00008071 295125 5726 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 262.30 MOPS, CLEANERS, TISSUE 00008072 295126 5722 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 832.84 362657 8/23/2012 130716 PURVES, ALAN J 450.56 LEASE DUNK TANK 7/25/12 295242 DUNKTANK 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 450.56 362658 812312012 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 368.77 TIRES 00006327 295054 CD1596859 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 368.77 362659 812312012 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 1,075.59 EMULSION 00005492 294845 3475 1301.6519 ROAD OIL 1,075.59 362660 812312012 125321 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PLAYGROUND & THEATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 620.00 KID N' PLAY PROGRAM 294916 7232 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 620.00 362661 812312012 125936 REINDERS INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 294847 081412 CITY OF EDINA DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 155.00 Council Check Register 362669 812312012 103249 SHANNON, JIM 8/23/2012 -812312012z, Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No •. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 72.46 DRIVE 00006321 295055 .3016600 -00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 72.46- 269.33 TIME CLOCK DUES 295130 362662 8123/2012 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 130347 RELIABLE PROPERTY S_ ERVICES 269.33 133.59 WEED CONTROL &.FERTILIZER 295056 39600 5422:6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION 133.59 160.91 BATTERIES 295058 68040795 7411.6406 362663 612312012 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 319.52 DRINKING FOUNTAIN REPAIR 294846 59882 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 319.52 362664 8/2312012 100978 RIEDE_LL SHOES INC. 693.30 SKATES 00008064 295127 54533769 5510.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 693.30 362665 812312012 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 133.08 SOFTNER SALT 294917 00271367 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 133:08 .362666 812312012 118168 SANSIO 733.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 295128 INV -07662 -2012 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING - 50.00.. EMS FAXING 295129 INV- 07536 -2012 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING 783.00 362667 812312012 100990. SCHARBER &SONS 37.08 TIED ROD END 00005416 295057 1104398 - 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 37.08 362668 812312012 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page -. 21 Business Unit' MAINT.OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT,OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE ARENA ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL "GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 155.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 294847 081412 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 155.00 362669 812312012 103249 SHANNON, JIM 140.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/28/12 294987 080112 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 140.00 362670 812312012 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 269.33 TIME CLOCK DUES 295130 64198 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 269.33 362671 812312012 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 160.91 BATTERIES 295058 68040795 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY' R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 8/23/2012 -8123/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 160.91 362672 812312012 101000 SIR SPEEDY 49.70 BUSINESS CARDS 294848 73504 1550.6406 49.70 BUSINESS CARDS 294849 73403 1550.6406 99.40 362673 812312012 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 185.50 REPAIR LEAKING COOLER 00006340 294850 30987 5421.6180 185.50 362674 8/2312012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 136.50 294955 1880442 5822.5513 1,686.00 294956 1846219 5822.5513 1,359.00 294957 1846306 5822.5513 449.00 294958 1880458 5822.5513 3,353.00 294959 1846307 5842.5513 477.50 294960 1880462 5842.5513 1,670.91 294961 1859357 5822.5512 5,660.16 295198 1859360 5842.5512 3,484.01 295199 1859322 5842.5512 92.01 295200 •1859377 5842.5512 265.50 295201 1855222 5862.5513 2,843.46 295202 1859361 5862.5512 2,317.47 295203 1859356 5862.5512 2,343.50 295204 1846308 5862.5513 954.62 295205 1880460 5862.5513 600.00- 295206 1880459 5862.5513 26,492.64 362676 8123/2012 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI 5,430.62 4TH QUARTER 294851 201217 1130.6136 5,430.62 362676 8/23/2012 105193 SPAIN, MARK 55.00 STUMP GRINDING 00001789 294852 073112 01367.1705.21 55.00 362677 8/2312012 130710 SPRING, PAUL 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/23/12 294984 080112 5760.6136 150.00 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 22 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 8121/2012 14:00:34 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES. E911 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON OCCUPANCY FERTILIZER , MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FERTILIZER MAINT; OF COURSE & GROUNDS Council Check Register 8/23/2012 - 8/23/2012 ° Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362678 8/2312012 129745 " ST LOUIS PARK DO GRILL AND CHI 49.98 _BIRTHDAY PARTY CAKES 295131 587 5720.6406 49.98 362679 812312012 117685 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 784.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 294918 114292480 1550.6406 784.71 362680 812312012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 25.47 SWITCH 00005509 294919 415778 1553.6530 ' 348.56 RETAINERS, FASCIA 00005510 295059 416154 - 1553.6530 374.03 . • 362681 812312012 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 58,343.65 EDINA 911 00003047 295060 54057 2310.6406 58,343.65 362682 812312012 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 42.73 PHONE LISTING 294920 080412 5821.6188 42.73 PHONE LISTING - 294920 080412 5841.6188 42.74 PHONE LISTING . 294920 080412 5861.6188 128.20 36.2683 812312012 102926 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 785.37 LIQUID FERTILIZER 295061 5350 -RGR 5422.6540 785.37 362684 8123/2012 121492 SUPERIOR TURF. SERVICES INC. 838.97 LIQUID FERTILIZER, DYE 00006315 295062 8340 5422.654E ,- 838.97 362685 812312012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 910.00 294962 004582 5842.5514 772.00 295207 004628 5822.5514 646.00 265208 RT02400040 5862.5514 2,328.00 362686 812312012 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 697.50 MOVIES IN THE.PARK 295063 DB1714589 5760.6136 697.50 362687 812312012 117049 SYNERGY GRAPHICS 8121/2012 14:00:34 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES. E911 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY FERTILIZER , MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FERTILIZER MAINT; OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 210.30 WALKING MAP 00002091 295064 66296 5760.6575 PRINTING 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 24 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GRILL 5440.5511 • COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 210.30 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 362688 812312012 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 40.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 294921 690358 40.00 362689 812312012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 377.85 MERCHANDISE 295132 18390753 715.01 295133 18374050 64.00- REBATE 295134 18725780 22.85- REBATE 295135 18724767 606.00- OPEN CREDIT 295136 18727209 400.01 362690 8123/2012 121056 THE WORKS 150.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 294928 1711 150.00 362691 812312012 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 129.50 294963 706518 4,308.70 295209 707139 180.65 295210 707140 763.00 295238 00773795 5,381.85 362692 812312012 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 325.00 COUNCIL MINUTES 8/06/12 295137 M19240 325.00 362693 8123/2012 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 214.69 BATTERIES 00005508 294922 9C07626 214.69 362694 8/2312012 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 422.76 WELDING HELMET, LENSES 00005485 294923 104341 422.76 362695 812312012 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 189.42 COPIER USAGE 295065 209356880 189.42 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 24 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GRILL 5440.5511 • COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1624.6406 - GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5421.5514 1120.6103 1553.6530 1553.6580 7410.6575 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS WELDING SUPPLIES PRINTING ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION Subledger Account. Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GEN ADAPTIVE REC REPAIR PARTS . 8/21120iz 14:00:34 Page - 25 Business Unit COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMP STUDY PROJECT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8123/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362696 812312012 122302 TOUCHPOINT LOGIC LLC 802.00 DISPLAY MONITORS FOR COUNCIL 295249 3603 421130.6710 802.00 362697 812312012 130715 TOWEY, KATIE 12.00 PROGRAM REFUND 295241 081612 1600.4390.15 12.00 362698 612312012 103962 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 1,714.14 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL BUTTIONS 00001908 295066 55302 1330.6530 1,714.14 362699 812312012 130066 TRUSIGHT 3,480.00 COMPENSATION STUDY 295067 214911 4412.6103 3,480.00 - 362700 812312012 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 36.69 PULLEY 00005427 294924 M102397 1553.6530 197.72 TINES, BRUSHES 00006312 295068 J163963A 5422.6530 214.30 TINES 295069 J164162 5422.6530 88.19 WHEEL, BOLTS 00006323 295070 T121 991 5431.6530 639.18 WHEEL MOTOR 00006323 295071 J164366 5422.6530 1,176.08 362701 612312012 130711 TWIN CITIES SHOW CHORUS 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/29/12 294989 080112 5760.6136 100.00 362702 812312012 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 529.42 FILTERS 00007501 295138 0516385 -IN 5511.6406 529.42 362703 812312012 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 320.63 GRASS SEED 00001805 294853 28341 1643.6547 801.56 GRASS SEED 00005498 294854 28364 1642.6547 480.94 GRASS SEED 00001859 294855 28343 1642.6547 809.58 SEED 00006161 295072 28279 5422.6543 2,412.71 362704 812312012 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1,316.34 UNIFORMS 294856 073112 1400.6203 1,316.34 Subledger Account. Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GEN ADAPTIVE REC REPAIR PARTS . 8/21120iz 14:00:34 Page - 25 Business Unit COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMP STUDY PROJECT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SEED GENERAL TURF CARE SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 - 8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362705 812312012 101065 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 990.00 STORMWATER EDUCATION 294925 081312 1640.6104 990.00 362706 8/23/2012 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 182.80 PAGERS 294857 V0319246H 1400.6151 182.80 362707 812312012 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1,400.00 CART LEASE 00006016 294858 63509 5423.6216 33.05 BEARING ASSEMBLY 00002083 295073 63444 5761.6530 192.38 CABLES 00006324 295074 63498 5423.6530 1,625.43 362708 8/2312012 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 360.00 FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION 295139 164708 5510.6103 360.00 362709 8/2312012 119464 VINOCOPIA 750.00 295211 0061497 -IN 5842.5513 325.00 295212 0061424 -IN 5862.5513 108.50 295213 0061422 -IN 5862.5512 1,183.50 362710 812312012 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 559.57 FOOD 295140 34427776 5320.5510 536.11 FOOD 295141 34389427 5320.5510 1,095.68 362711 812312012 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 34.15 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001843 294859 15208652 -00 1322.6406 125.68 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001843 294859 15208652 -00 5431.6406 535.58 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001843 294859 15208652 -00 1646.6406 695.41 362712 612312012 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/28/12 294988 080112 5760.6136 150.00 362713 812312012 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 758.09 BACKGROUND CHECK CHARGES 294926 825422384 1400.6103 Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT RENTAL LEASE LINES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 26 Business Unit PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF CARS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING GOLF CARS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 35 00- CREDIT 294927 6080475752 1400.6103 8/21/2:._ 14:00:34 Page - 27 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES f POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 723.09 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 362714 812312012 VERNON SELLING . 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 897,20 5842.5513 294964 306845 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 465.90 5822.5512 295214 307000 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,363.10 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 362715 812312012 YORK SELLING 101312 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,090.72 5822.5512 295215.. 419983 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,417.61 5862.5515 295216 419980 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,018.08 5862.5512 295217 419982 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 13.44 5421.5514 295218 413834 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 89.12- 5862.5514 295219 58664 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7,423.85 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 362716 812312012 VERNON SELLING 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,637.06 _ 294965 788703 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 989.86 294966 788705 6,020.30 294967 788706 6,400.38 294968 788708 69.06 294969 788707 81.94 294970 865512 216.20 295220 788704 2,048.23 295221 788699 38.05 295222 788701 1;053.16 295223 787217 216.20 295224 788700 4,632.47 295225 ,788702 23,239.03 - 362717 812312012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 779.60 294971 939317 172.00 294972 939250 3,106.65 294973 939518 107.70 294974 939519 ,96.00 294975 939520 3,143.55 294976 939910 112.00 294977 936441 144.00 294978 940523 2,500.35 294979 940522 2,099.92 295226 942776 8/21/2:._ 14:00:34 Page - 27 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES f POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING . 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5662.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER - YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 — 8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 01404.1705.20 5932.6103 03466.1705.21 04381.1705.21 05516.1705.21 01384.1705.21 05526.1705.21 03472.1705.21 04388.1705.21 01368.1705.21 1375.6185 1646.6185 1552.6185 1322.6185 5911.6185 5420.6185 1330.6185 5761.6185 1400.6103 5842.5513 5862.5513 1551.6180 1180.6013 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 28 Business Unit FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR GENERAL STORM SEWER SS -466 W 44TH ST RECON INTERLACHEN BLVD SIDEWALK W 44TH ST RECON RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION TRACY AVE TRACY AVE TRACY AVE BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL WELL PUMPS CLUB HOUSE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS - _ CITY HALL GENERAL SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 12,261.77 362718 812312012 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 27,709.00 FRANCE AVE PED CROSSING 294929 3- 01686 -300 1,296.50 MS4 SERVICES 294930 1 -02092 -200 208.40 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 295075 21- 01686 -170 833.58 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 295075 21 -01686 -170 1,844.99 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 295075 21- 01686 -170 4,059.53 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 295075 21- 01686 -170 1,125.71 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 295076 8 -01686 -250 2,090.60 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 295076 8- 01686 -250 3,055.49 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 295076 8- 01686 -250 9,809.70 TRACY AVE IMPROVEMENTS 295076 8- 01686 -250 52,033.50 362719 8123/2012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 4,984.09 51- 5888961 -7 294860 335185931 12,952.35 51 -0121102 -5 294861 335189313 5,088.43 51- 5619094 -8 294931 335720285 390.08 51 -4197645 -8 294932 335873192 45,741.07 51- 5605640 -1 294933 335717742 10,637.64 51- 6824328 -7 295077 335202698 46.67 51- 5276505 -8 295142 336062549 3,713.19 51- 6227619 -3 295143 335908065 83,553.52 362720 812312012 118028 YAHOOI CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS 20.00 SUBPOENA CHARGES 295248 NO. 209024 20.00 362721 812312012 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 133.00 294980 11254 74.50 295227 11290 207.50 362722 8/2312012 101091 23EGLER INC 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 294934 E6395941 450.00 362723 812312012 106467 ABY, KATHERINE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295362 082112 168.19 01404.1705.20 5932.6103 03466.1705.21 04381.1705.21 05516.1705.21 01384.1705.21 05526.1705.21 03472.1705.21 04388.1705.21 01368.1705.21 1375.6185 1646.6185 1552.6185 1322.6185 5911.6185 5420.6185 1330.6185 5761.6185 1400.6103 5842.5513 5862.5513 1551.6180 1180.6013 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 28 Business Unit FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR GENERAL STORM SEWER SS -466 W 44TH ST RECON INTERLACHEN BLVD SIDEWALK W 44TH ST RECON RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION TRACY AVE TRACY AVE TRACY AVE BA -368 TRACY AVE RECON PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL WELL PUMPS CLUB HOUSE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS - _ CITY HALL GENERAL SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledgei Account Description Business Unit 362724 812312012 104617 ACKER, RITA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295363 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362725 8/2312012 104518 ANDERSON, C_AROLYN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295364 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362726 8123/2012 130719 ANDERSON, MARY LOUISE . 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295365 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362727 812312012 123480 BARD, MARSHA. 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295366 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362728 812312012 127094 ,BECKER, MARY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295367 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 .362729 812312012 106476 BERTELSON, CAROL M. 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295368 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362730 812312012 104598 BEUERLEIN, CYNTHIA 168.19 . ELECTION JUDGE 295369 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP.EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362731 812312012 106479 BOEMER, JULIETL 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295370 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362732 812312012 127096 BOOK, MARY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295371 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362733 812312012 130720 BOOK, RAYMOND 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295372 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362734 812312012 104580 BRADBURY, KATHERINE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 8/21/2012 14:00:34 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 219.38 362735 812312012 -8/23/2012 106481 BRANDBERG, ZOE ANNE 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE Account No 222.19 Business Unit 362736 812312012 082112 106482 BRELLENTHIN, ADELE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 082112 170.63 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 362737 812312012 295375 123162 BROWER, KATHY 1180.6013 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295376 165.75 1180.6013 362738 812312012 ELECTION 106485 BURNETT, JAMES H. 082112 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 165.75 082112 362739 812312012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106487 CALGREN, MARY C. 295379 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 165.75 295380 362740 812312012 1180.6013 106488 CAMPION, CHRISTINE ELECTION 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 165.75 ELECTION 362741 812312012 082112 104584 CARDLE, JOHN SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 082112 24.38 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 362742 8123/2012 117116 CARLSON, JOHN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 362743 8/2312012 117117 CARLSON, SANDRA 247.50 ELECTION JUDGE 247.50 362744 812312012 129678 CARPENTER, JANE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 30 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295373 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295374 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295375 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295376 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295377 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295378 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295379 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295380 062112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295381 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295382 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295383 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 8/2112012 14:00:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 8123/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362745 812312012 104624 CARROLL, PAULINE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295384 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362746 812312012 123156 CHRISTIANSEN, MARILYN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295385 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362747 812.312012 104526 COOKE, EILEEN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295386 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362748 812312012 104527 CRACRAFT, JOHN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295387 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362749 812312012 104528 CRACRAFT, MARIAN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE ' 295388 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362750 812312012 104529 CREW, COLLEEN 225.00 ELECTION JUDGE 295389 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 225.00 362751 812312012 123157 CROKER, DEBORAH 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295390 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 _ 362752 812312012 122552 CRUM, SPENCER - 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295391 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362763 812312012 130721 VAQUILA, DONNA .. 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295395 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362754 8/2312012 127416 DALE, BYRON 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295392 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362755 812312012 127416 DALE, JUDITH R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 8121/2012 14:00:34 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 160.88 362756 812312012 - 8123/2012 104530 DANIELSON, GLORIA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE Account No 165.75 Business Unit 362757 812312012 082112 105069 DAWSON, PAT SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 148.64 ELECTION STAFF 082112 148.64 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 362758 812312012 295541 108564 DEBERG, GLORIA 1180.6013 230.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295396 230.63 1180.6013 362759 812312012 ELECTION 123158 DEMAREST, AMY 082112 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 24.38 082112 362760 812312012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106513 DEZELLER, DELPHA 295399 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 295400 362761 812312012 1180.6013 104531 DILL, PATRICIA ELECTION 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 227.81 ELECTION 362762 812312012 082112 130722 DIMMOCK, JOHN SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 082112 168.19 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 362763 812312012 130723 DONOVAN, WENDY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 362764 8123/2012 127084 DUHN, SHEILA 101.25 ELECTION JUDGE 101.25 362765 812312012 123160 DUKE, SONTRUD 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 CITY OF EDINA 8121/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 32 8123/2012 - 8123/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295393 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295394 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295541 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295396 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295397 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295398 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295399 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295400 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295401 062112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295402 082112 1160.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295403 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/20 it 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 33 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362766 812312012 130724 EBERLEIN, EMMA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295404 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362767 812312012 130725 ' EBERLEIN; ERIKA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295405 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362768 812312012 127418 ENRICH,WILLIAM ' 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295406 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362769 8/2312012 127078 FETTERMAN, LAURIE 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 295407 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 236.25 362770 812312012 116948. FIEDLER,BOB 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295408 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362771 812312012 104534 FINK, PAUL 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295409 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 362772 812312012 127086 FOSSUM, JOHN - 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295410 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362773 8/2312012 123167 - FREY, GINNY, 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 295411 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 362774 812312012 130726 FULUVAKA, SUZANNE 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 295412 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 - 362775 812312012 123170 GEURTS, VALERIE . 244.69 ELECTION JUDGE 295413 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 244.69 362776 812312012 120241 GIESEKE, DANIEL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation Council Check Register 117.00 ELECTION JUDGE 8/23/2012 117.00 362777 8/2312012 Inv No 106562 GRIFFITHS, GEORGE 111 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 295415 362778 8123/2012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 124340 GRIMES, DORIS 295416 082112 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 295417 170.63 1180.6013 362779 8/23/2012 295418 106510 HABECK, MUZA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 082112 1180.6013 170.63 ELECTION 362780 8/2312012 1180.6013 106566 HAMAN, EUGENE E. ELECTION 295421 230.63 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 230.63 082112 362781 812312012 ELECTION 117134 HANSEN, JUDITH 082112 1180.6013 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295424 082112 24.38 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 362782 812312012 106570 HANSON, JOAN B. 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 362783 8123/2012 120244 HASNUDEEN, BUDDY 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 24.38 362784 812312012 120245 HASNUDEEN, MARY 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 24.38 362785 812312012 127079 HED, SHARON 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 362786 8/23/2012 130727 HEINEN, JACKIE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 6/2112012 14:00:34 Page - 34 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295414 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295415 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295416 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295417 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295418 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295419 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295420 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295421 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295422 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295423 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295424 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 6/2112012 14:00:34 Page - 34 Business Unit ELECTION ELECTION 8121/20iz 14:00:34 Page - 35 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE CITY OF EDINA 082112 R55CKREG LOG20000 _ ELECTION 165.75 Council Check Register 362790 812312012 8/2312012 — 8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No' Account No Subledger Account Description 362787 812312012 295428 120246 HOAGLUND, BETHEL 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295425 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 24.38 362791 812312012 362788 8123/2012 123507 HOLDEN, WILLIAM 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295426 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 092112 1180.6013 24.38 ELECTION 362789 812312012 130728 HOLST, ALAN Business Unit ELECTION ELECTION 8121/20iz 14:00:34 Page - 35 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295427 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362790 812312012 105396 HOPF, NANCY' 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295428 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362791 812312012 117139 HOPPE, JUDY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295429 092112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 - 362792 812312012 123175 HORNER, ROSALENE 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295430 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES _ ELECTION - 24.38 362783 812312012 104603- HORTON, ANNETTE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295431 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362794 . 8/2312012 108573 HUDOBA; TERRI 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295432 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES "' ELECTION 222.19 362795 812312012 130729 HURLEY, MARION 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295433 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES - ELECTION 24.38 362796 812312012 105397 HYKES, MYRA 225:00 ELECTION JUDGE 295434 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES" ELECTION 225.00 362797 812312012 130730 JELLEN, ROSEMARY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation ELECTION Council Check Register 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 170.63 082112 362798 812312012 Subledger Account Description 106598 JOHNSON, ALLEN C. 295435 082112 1180.6013 i 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295436 082112 1180.6013 24.38 ELECTION 362799 812312012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104606 JOHNSON, KATE 295437 082112 1180.6013 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295439 082112 1180.6013 219.38 ELECTION 362800 8/2312012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106600 JOHNSON, SHIRLEY M. 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 362801 812312012 106608 KACHAN, MARY K. 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 362802 8/2312012 106538 KAPAUN, ANN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 362803 , 812312012 123613 KATZ, DALIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 362804 812312012 106539 KEENAN, ANN 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 222.19 362805 812312012 130763 KEINER, JOAN 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 24.38 362806 812312012 123176 KELLAMS, LOUISE 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 24.38 362807 812312012 116954 KETCHUM, KATHERINE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 295441 CITY OF EDINA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION Council Check Register 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 295443 082112 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295435 082112 1180.6013 i SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295436 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295438 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295437 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295439 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295440 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295441 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295442 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295443 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295444 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295445 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 36 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 37 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362808 8/2312012 106540 KINGSTON, JESSICA 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295446 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 362809 812312012 106541 KLEFSAAS, MAVIS 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295447 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362810 812312012 105399 KOESTER, MARCIA 241.88 ELECTION JUDGE 295448 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 241.88 362811 812312012 106543 KOPP, JANET 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295449 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362812 812312012 106546 KOSTERS, JULIA 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295450 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362813 812312012 120381 KOUATLI,M_ARTHA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGES 295451 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362814. 8123/2012 130764 KOUDSI, HANA 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295452 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362815 812312012 123177 KRINSKY -LEON, KAREN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295463 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362816 812312012 123179 LANDBERG, JAMES 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295453 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362817 812312012 106550 LANDBERG, MARY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295454 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362818 8/2312012 121626 LANE, PAUL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check Register 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 8/23/2012 165.75 362819 812312012 Inv No 123180 LAN7, KAREN Subledger Account Description Business Unit 216.56 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 216.56 295456 362820 812312012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 127437 LAPPIN, GERTRUDE 295457 082112 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 295456 170.63 1180.6013 362821 812312012 295459 123181 LARSEN, KRISTINE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 082112 1180.6013 160.88 ELECTION 362822 812312012 1180.6013 130765 LARSON, BARBARA ELECTION 295462 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 082112 362823 8123/2012 ELECTION 106553 LEEFELDT, PATRICIA 082112 1180.6013 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295466 082112 165.75 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 362824 812312012 123182 LEER, BONNIE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 362825 812312012 130766 LEMMER, KELSEY 126.75 ELECTION JUDGE 126.75 362826 8/2312012 123523 LINDSAY, SUSAN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 362827 812312012 127104 LOEWENBERG, ELLEN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 362628 8123/2012 127069 LOVELAND, CYNTHIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 38 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295455 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295456 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295457 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295456 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295459 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295460 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295461 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295462 130766 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295464 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295465 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295466 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page - 38 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 39 8/23/2012 —8/2312012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362829 812312012 120249 LUCAS, WILLIAM 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295467 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362830 812312012 130767 LUNDHOLM,'KAREN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295468 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362831 812312012 123183 MAEDER, BARBARA - 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295469 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP.EMPLOYEES ELECTION - 170.63 362832 812312012 108574 MAETZOLD, LINDA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295470 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362833 812312012 120386 MAST, BOYD -- 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295471 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 362834 812312012 130768 MAZZARA, PATTI 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE -295472 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362835 812312012 106586 MCFARLANE, BARBARA 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295473 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 362836 812312012 104548 MCGLYNN, ROSEMARY 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295474 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362837 812312012 106589 MCGOLDRICK, FRANCIS - 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295475 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362838 812312012 106592 MCHENRY, JOY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295476 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362839 812312012 123186 MCKUSICK, SUSAN R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check Register 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 8/23/2012 24.38 362840 812312012 Inv No 127092 MCMILLAN, JOAN Subledger Account Description Business Unit 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 295478 362841 812312012 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104647 MELICHAR, MARGARET C. 295479 082112 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 295480 170.63 1180.6013 362842 812312012 295481 120250 MENZEL, MARVIN 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 082112 1180.6013 222.19 ELECTION 362843 812312012 1180.6013 127087 MILLER, KAREN ELECTION 295484 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 082112 362844 8/2312012 ELECTION 116961 MILLER, NANCY 082112 1180.6013 225.00 ELECTION JUDGE 295489 082112 225.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 362846 812312012 127090 MOBERG, JANET 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 24.38 362848 8/2312012 106606 MONTEZ, PATRICIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 362847 8/2312012 104551 MONTGOMERY, BETH 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 213.75 362848 8/23/2012 106619 NIEFELD, SUSAN 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 236.25 362849 812312012 120254 O'NEILL, ORDELL 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 8/2112012 14:00:34 Page - 40 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295477 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295478 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295479 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295480 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295481 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295482 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295483 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295484 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295485 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295486 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295489 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 8/2112012 14:00:34 Page - 40 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register - 8/2312012 —8/23/2,012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation _ PO #.. Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account,Descdption Business Unit 362850 812312012 104616 OLANDER, PATRICIA 227.81 :. ELECTION JUDGE 295487 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 362851 8123/2012 130769 OLSON, MARDE 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 295488 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 236.25 362852 812312012 123194 OWENS, NORMAN 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295490 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 213.75 362853 812312012 106632 PATE, MARY, _ 225.00 ELECTION JUDGE 295491 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 225.00 362854 812312012 120256 PEARCE, JEAN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295492 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362855 812312012 123195 PEARCE, WAIN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295493 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362856 812312012 120257 PETERSON, JOHN,. , 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295494 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362857 812312012 104556 POLLITT, BETTY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295495 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES. ELECTION 170.63 362858 812312012 120400.. QUINN, JOYCE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295496 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362859 8/2312012 120259 REED, ROBERT 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295497 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362860 812312012 130770 REHM, ERIC 8/21/2012 14:00:34 . Page- 41 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 42 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295498 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362661 812312012 106584 ROBERTSON, LOIS M 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295499 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362862 812312012 106276 RODGERS, JUDITH 230.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295500 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 230.63 362663 8123/2012 127081 RODGERS, WILLUIM 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295501 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362864 8123/2012 120260 ROHLF, ROBERT 158.44 ELECTION JUDGE 295502 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 158.44 362865 812312012 130771 ROSENTHAL- ERICKSON, LUANN 230.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295503 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 230.63 362866 8123/2012 130772 ROTHE, CAROL 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295504 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.36 362867 8123/2012 123537 RUSH, MILAGROS 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295505 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362868 812312012 105405 RYAN, MARY E. 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295506 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362869 812312012 130773 SAMUELS, MIKE 24.36 ELECTION JUDGE 295507 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362870 812312012 123199 SAWATZKY, RANDY 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295508 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 CITY OF EDINA 8/2112612 14:00:34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 43 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 Check # Date Amount _ Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descriptlon Business Unit 362871 812312012 106587 SCHRAMM, CONSTANCE E. 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295509 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ; ELECTION 165.75 362872 812312012 116970 SCHWIEBERT, SARA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295510 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362873 812312012 106595 SELID, MARION P. 165.75 - ELECTION JUDGE 295511 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362874 812312012 127095 SEWELL,:KATHERINE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295512 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362875 812312012 121625 -SHEA, LINCOLN 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295513 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362876 812312012 124803 SKELLY, MICHAEL 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295514 062112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362877 812312012 130774 SKIBBE, MARGARET 121.88 ELECTION JUDGE 295515 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 121.88 ` 36.2878 812312012 123204 - SKOY, MARY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295516 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 362879 812312012 106609 SMITH, RUTH L 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 295517 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 362880 812312012 127097: SMITH, SUSAN - 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 295518 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 362881 8123/2012 106612 STALPES, GAIL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation Council Check Register 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 8/23/2012 24.38 362882 812312012 Inv No 123208 STEBLAY, VIVIAN Subledger Account Description Business Unit 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 295520 362883 812312012 - SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106622 STRANG, LEE M 295521 082112 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 295522 168.19 1180.6013 362884 812312012 295523 130775 SUNDQUIST, ROBERT 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 082112 1180.6013 24.38 ELECTION 362885 812312012 1180.6013 123210 SWEET, PHILOTHEA . ELECTION 295526 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 082112 362886 812312012 ELECTION 116976 TIGGAS, ANDREA 082112 1180.6013 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 295529 082112 236.25 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 362887 812312012 106629 ULVIN, JANET M 241.88 ELECTION JUDGE 241.88 362888 812312012 104626 VANEK, MARY 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 24.38 362889 812312012 116979 VOSS, RAY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 362890 812312012 120521 WADDICK, LOUANN 247.50 ELECTION JUDGE 247.50 362891 812312012 129679 WALDIN, DEB 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 8121/2012 14:00:34 Page- 44 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2012 -8/23/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295519 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295520 082112 1180.6013 - SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295521 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295522 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295523 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295524 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295525 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295526 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295527 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295528 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 295529 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 8121/2012 14:00:34 Page- 44 R55CKREG LOG20000 812312012 108598 WELBAUM, MIKE CITY OF EDINA 24.38 Council Check Register 295535 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 8/23/2012 -8123/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No . Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362892 812312012 130776 WALLANDER,.DONNA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295536 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295530 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 168.19 362899 362893 812312012 130778 WOLFF, ELIZABETH' 106638 WASHBURN,.VIRGINIA 216.56 ELECTION JUDGE 295531 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION ELECTION 216.56 168.19 382894 812312012 362900 116981 WEBER, JENNY 123217 WOXLAND, KATHRYN 208.13 ELECTION JUDGE 295532 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 082112 1180.6013 208.13 ELECTION 222.19 362895 812312012 108597 WEEKS, DEANNA 362901 812312012 130779 WU, GEORGE 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 295533 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION ' ELECTION JUDGE 213.75 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 362896 812312012 123212 WEHRMEISTER, PAUL 362902 812312012 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295534 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Page- 45 362897 812312012 108598 WELBAUM, MIKE 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 295535 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 362898 812312012 130777 WENGER, WAYNE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295536 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362899 812312012 130778 WOLFF, ELIZABETH' 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295537 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 362900 812312012 123217 WOXLAND, KATHRYN 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 295538 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 362901 812312012 130779 WU, GEORGE 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 29553.9 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 236.25 362902 812312012 127101 ZIERDEN, DEBORAH R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 2,627,315.35 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA 8/21/2012 14:00:34 Council Check Register Page - 46 8/23/2012 —8/23/2012 R PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295540 082112 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 2,627,315.35 Total Payments 2,627,315.35 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 8123/2012 - 8/23/2012 Company Amount' " 01000 GENERAL FUND 133,584.36 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 58,941.56 04000- WORKING CAPITAL FUND 698,201.90. 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 18,667.89 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,Q17.26 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 6,118.42. " 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 37,231.25 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 5,516.21 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 4,383.13 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 8,363.54 05800 LIQUOR,FUND 179;760.98: 05900 UTILITY FUND 1,063,828.85 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 400,570.17 05950. RECYCLING FUND 2,400.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,471.08 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,258.75 Report Totals 2,627,315.35 We confmn to, the best-of our knowledge and belief,-that,these- claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina-purchasing poticie an procedu3 an er 8/21/2012 14:01:41 Page- 1- Subledger Account Description TOOLS 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page- 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS ALARM SERVICE 357.37 CONCRETE 00001887 295607 703693257 1647.6517 k SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 357.37 362909 813012012 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 405.60 CO2 LIQUID BULK 295847 29729366 5330.6545 405.60 362910 8130/2012 100675 ALL SAFE INC. 281.95 EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION 295608 115785 5430.6230 281.95 362911 8130/2012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 91.01 CARTRIDGES, DEF FLUID 00005551 295848 AFS- 222290017 1553.6530 91.01 CHEMICALS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PATHS & HARD SURFACE FLOWRIDER SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 8/30/2012 -8130/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362903 8/3012012 100612 A.M. LEONARD 91.48 PRUNER 295542 C112119955 5761.6556 91.48 362904 613012012 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 770.64 UB TEMP 295543 36115179 5910.6103 770.64 362905 813012012 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 93.20 295681 1601116 5862.5515 92.40 295682 1604194 5842.5515 29.20 295683 1604192 5822.5515 89.20 295684 1604193 5862.5515 70.00 295955 1606222 5822.5515 68.40 - 295956 1606224 5842.5515 100.40 295957 1605510 5842.5515 542.80 362906 813012012 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES 65.30 BEARINGS, RACE, SEALS 00005555 295845 S028856 1553.6530 65.30 362907 813012012 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 104.22 ALARM SERVICE 295846 77574515 5111.6250 104.22 362908 8130/2012 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES Subledger Account Description TOOLS 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page- 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS ALARM SERVICE 357.37 CONCRETE 00001887 295607 703693257 1647.6517 k SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 357.37 362909 813012012 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 405.60 CO2 LIQUID BULK 295847 29729366 5330.6545 405.60 362910 8130/2012 100675 ALL SAFE INC. 281.95 EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATION 295608 115785 5430.6230 281.95 362911 8130/2012 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 91.01 CARTRIDGES, DEF FLUID 00005551 295848 AFS- 222290017 1553.6530 91.01 CHEMICALS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PATHS & HARD SURFACE FLOWRIDER SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA' 8/28/2012 11:48:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 2 i 8/30/2012 —8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation. POW Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362912 813012012 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 1,263.99 COPIER PAPER 295544 10333406 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,263.99 362913 813012012 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 5,837.78 PROPERTY INSURANCE 295809 6100000138057 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,837.76 i 362914 613012012 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 981.60 FOOD, 295609 1783404 '- 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS`SOLD GRILL 28.50- CREDIT 295610 1781148 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 390.89 FOOD 295849 1783525 5730.5510` COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,343.99 362915 8/30/2012 118491 APPLE COMPUTER INC. 1,375.88 IPADS 00004356 295810. .4201420726 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 1,375.88 362916 813012012 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 110.63 COFFEE 295611 1032446` 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 110.63 362917 813012012 103191 ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION - 15.00 MEMBER 110403123613 295611 TOM HORWATH 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 15.00 362918 8/3012012 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 25.96 IPAD DATA SERVICE 295917 287240706569X08 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 1712 25.96 362919 8130/2012 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 300.00 SQUAD REPAIRS 295583 3765 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 404.36 SQUAD REPAIRS 295584 3764 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT, MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 704.36 — 362920 8130/2012 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 84.63 BUSINESS CARDS 295585 488 - 1400.6104 CONFERENCES-& SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.63 362921 8130/2012 100638 BACHMAN'S 895.76 PLANTINGS FOR POOL PARK 00001873:2951812 41544/1-- 1644:6541 PLANTINGS & TREES'' TREES & MAINTENANCE. R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 895.76 362922 813012012 100642 BANNERS TO GO 465.59 PARK SIGNS 129.33 PARK SIGNS 594.92 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2012 -8/30/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00001881 295612 34490 00001818 295613 34494 362923 8130/2012 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 444.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 295545 23270354.00 -19 444.00 362924 813012012 100644 BARRETT MOVING AND STORAGE 896.00 MOVE ELECTION EQUIPMENT 295546 8283- 1755 -2/1 896.00 PICK UP ELECTION EQUIPMENT 295813 B283- 1756 -2/1 1 ,792.00 i 362925 8/30/2012 102257 BEACHS AWARDS 151.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PLAQUES 295850 082112 151.00 362926 813012012 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 398.55 295685 74769800 109.65 295686 74756800 73.10 295687 74756700 221.55 295688 74770200 332.15 1 295689 74770100 79.36 295690 87206800 90.48 295691 6229800 35.91 295692 87206900 35.98 295693 87207000 119.51 295694 87207200 27.13 295695 87207100 227.10 295958 74770300 .51 295959 74850500 585.30 295960 74850400 558.40 295961 74838300 234.15 295962 87239200 409.84 295963 6233400 3,538.67 362927 813012012 126139 BERNICK'S WINE 55.50 295964 16030 1647.6406 1647.6406 5932.6103 1180.6103 1180.6103 5410.6406 5842.5512 5842.5515 5822.5515 5822.5512 5862.5512 5861.6406 5862.5515 5822.6406 5822.5515 5842.5515 5842.6406 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 5842.5515 5822.5515 5842.5513 Subledger Account Descriptions GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page - 3 Business Unit PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD, SURFACE GENERAL STORM SEWER ELECTION ELECTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON OCCUPANCY VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES Council Check Register 8/30/2012 -8/3012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 55.50 362928 813012012 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 114.95 COFFEE 00001044 295547 1034966 1280.6406 114.95 362929 813012012 122668 BMK SOLUTIONS 42.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 295851 78844 1495.6406 44.97 295852 79114 1495.6406 87.00 362930 8130/2012 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 8.00 PETTY CASH 295918 082312 5422.6406 18.38 PETTY CASH 295918 082312 5422.6275 40.92 PETTY CASH 295918 082312 5422.6545 45.00 PETTY CASH 295918 -082312 5410.6105 60.00 PETTY CASH 295918 082312 5401.4553 70.83 PETTY CASH 295918 082312 5410.6406 243.13 362931 813012012 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 504.25 AGLIME 00001791 295614 081512 1642.6542 504.25 362932 813012012 130794 BRZEZJNSKI, ROBERT 178.64 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 295919 4816 TOWNES RD 5900.2015 178.64 362933 813012012 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 456.00 GOLF BALLS 295920 923774843 5440.5511 234.07 295921 923742575 5440.5511 234.07- 295922 923771802 5440.5511 135.48 295923 923742571 5440.5511 135.48- 295924 923771768 5440.5511 456.00 362934 8/30/2012 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 323.00 LEGAL 295814 2851G -7/12 1195.6131 323.00 362935 813012012 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,579.20 295698 148080 5842.5514 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page- 4 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation HEAT 33.50 ENERGY Council Check Register 94.50 Page - 5 FUEL OIL 814.72 5596524 -8 3,521.92 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 362936 8/3012012 103268 CARLSON, DAVID- 148079 5842.5515 113.72 UNIFORM PURCHASE 295748 113.72 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 362937 813012012 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 270.00 1 191 on 5584304 -9 295586 082112 295696 94134 295697 94203 295750 94217 362938 CITY OF EDINA HEAT 8/28/2u12 11:48:42 ENERGY Council Check Register HEAT Page - 5 FUEL OIL 8130/2012 -8/30/2012 5596524 -8 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 295699 148079 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 295748 148077 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 295749 148078 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 295586 082112 295696 94134 295697 94203 295750 94217 362938 813012012 HEAT 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY PSTF FIRE TOWER HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY FUEL OIL 14.47 5596524 -8 295615 5596524 -8/12 117.73 8034001 -1 295815 8034001 -8/12 12.82 5584310 -6 295853 5584310 -8/12 151.14 5584304 -9 295854 5584304 -8/12 35.46 295855 5590919 -8/12 331.62 362939 6130/2012 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 184.51 ENVELOPES 295548 70475 184.51 I 362940 813012012 123898 CENTURYLINK 60.09 952 944 -6522 295549 6522 -8/12 58.97 952 9441841 295616 1841 -8/12 119.06 362941 813012012 102519 CHIEF'S TOWING INC 1 365.29 CARS FOR TRAINING COURSE 295856 584263 365.29 362942 8/3012012 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 240.95 295965 480852 240.95 362943 813012012 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 330.00 EDINA MAP ADVERTISING 295858 COM1172 1400.6203 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5430.6186 1552.6186 7413.6186 7411.6186 7413.6582 1550.6406 5511.6188 1640.6188 7410.6218 5822.5514 5710.6122 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE EDUCATION PROGRAMS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PSTF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 RICHARDS GOLF COURSE SEWER& WATER CITY OF EDINA ' BUILDING MAINTENANCE SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION. COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 8/30/2012 —8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No - Account No 330.00 362944 813012012 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 415.83 00105263- 0335037016 295617 335037016 -8/12 5430.6189 42.44 00077443 -0332300005 295816 332300005 -8/12 1646.6189 50.87 00077443-0332300004 295817 332300004 -8/12 1646.6189 1,163.27 00086676- 0330288022 295857 330288022 -8/12 5310.6189 1,672.41 362945 813012012 102165 CLEVELAND GOLF 143.18 MERCHANDISE 295925 3830885SO - '5440:5511 143.18 362946 813012012 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 63.27 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT .295859 082412 1600.6107 63.27 362947 813012012 120433 COMCAST 106.95 8772 10 614 0396908 295860 396.908 -8/12 5760.6230 106.95 — 362948 813012012 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 34,164.76 ASPHALT 00005504' 295550 081512 1314.6518 .34,164.76 362949 813012012 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. - 539.96 SAW 00003852;'295926 85684, 1470.6406 539.96 362950 813012012 100696 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 44.46 SPODUMENE 00009071 295861 INV000070665 5110.6564 44.46 362951 8130/2012 101915 COUNTRY FLAGS 1,774.13 FLAGS 295818 6032 1551.6406 1,774.13 362952 813012012 129442 CRIMINAL ADDICTION INC. 7,900.00 INSTRUCTOR FEES 295927 SMPSTF 7410.6218 7,900.00 362953 813012012 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER Subledger Account Description, Business Unit SEWER & WATER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE SEWER& WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION. COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SERVICBCONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAU LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER "ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 333.94 114 - 10014678 -5 813012012 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 333.94 5421.5510 362954 813012012 OF 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. I 157.78 544.00 PUMP SUMP, TRENCH DRAINS 61641906 544.00 SOLD 157.78 362955 813012012 OF 104020 DALCO 362959 8/3012012 141.78 HAND TOWELS GOODS 141.78 362956 8/30/2012 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY I 295620 192.33 DAIRY 5,443.33 192.33 362957 8/3012012 362960 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 5,535.86 89.60 88.78 43.00 1 .4c q9 295621 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2012 - 8/3012012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 295954 JUL2012 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 295618 90802 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 00001454 295819 2500145 295619 073012 295700 664755 295701 664754 295751 664756 295752 664752 295966 664753 1552.6511 5421.5510 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5515 5862.5514 5822.5514 1400.6513 5421.5510 CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page - 7 Business Unit POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,649.66 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 362958 813012012 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100713 DAY - TIMERS INC. 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS 157.78 DESK CALENDARS 295587 61641906 GOODS SOLD 157.78 COST OF GOODS 362959 8/3012012 COST 101534 DELI DOUBLE GOODS SOLD 5,443.33 FOOD 00006051 295620 098360 5,443.33 362960 813012012 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 88.78 BAKERY 295621 422948 65.77 295622 423051 75.90 295623 423052 50.40 295624 423302 58.03 295625 423390 125.59 295862 423565 464.47 362961 813012012 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 750.00 AERATION PERMITS (3) 295928 FEES 1552.6511 5421.5510 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5515 5862.5514 5822.5514 1400.6513 5421.5510 CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page - 7 Business Unit POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING OFFICE SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS'SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5933.6260 LICENSES 8 PERMITS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL PONDS & LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2812012 11:48:42 Council Check Register Page - 8 8/30/2012 — 8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 750.00 362962 813012012 130795 DESIGNED GLASS INC. 406.53 TEMPERED GLASS SHELVES 00008277 295929 W000016779 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 406.53 362963 8/30/2012 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 56.30 650243624 295863 650243624 -8/12 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 56.30 362964 813012012 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,698.73 REFUSE 295864 1422951 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,513.70 REFUSE 295865 4146947 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 6,212.43 362965 8/3012012 130797 DIMOCK, TOM 97.50 ART WORK SOLD 295930 082312 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 97.50 362966 813012012 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 750.00 SOUTHDALE TIF PLAN 295551 1816050 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 750.00 362967 8130/2012 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 8,559.75 FA2 CHIPS 00005503 295552 79691 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 26,831.15 295553 79729 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 26,896.91 295554 79780 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 62,287.81 362968 813012012 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 257.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 295913 082412 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 257.50 362969 813012012 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 12,225.35 INSTALL MESH NETTING AT FIELDS00001130 295626 0099773 -IN 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 12,225.35 362970 813012012 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 288.38 IMAGES OF EDINA TROPHIES 295931 87235 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 288.38 362971 813012012 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. CITY OF EDINA 8/28/2012 11:48:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 8/30/2012 -8/3012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 32.73 PHOTOCONTROL 00001309 295627 09209600 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 32.73 362972 813012012 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 250.00 DUES - SCOTT NEAL 295820 32256 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 250.00 362973 813012012 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 163.56 BULBS, SWITCHES 00005397 295821 186541 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 163.56 362974 813012012 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 280.39 STEERING ARM, JOINT ASSEMBLIES0005480 295555 69- 075196 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.27- CREDIT 295556 1- 3965008 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.90 ROTORS, PADS 00005480 295866 69- 075709 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 397.02 I 362975 8130/2012 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 585.25 FOOD 295867 1477525 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 585.25 362976 813012012 102669 FDSOA 85.00 ANNUAL DUES 295628 082112 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 85.00 362977 813012012 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 10.59 PACKAGING 00006364 295868 062200027408 5440.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 10.59 362978 813012012 102360 FIRE SPECIALTIES COMPANY 347.94 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003851 295629 12918 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 347.94 362979 813012012 119211 FIRSTLAB 637.30 DRUG TESTING 295557 00555838 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 637.30 362980 8130/2012 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 641.50 WINDOW CLEANING 295630 31557806 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 641.50 362981 813012012 104451 FRANK J. 7AMBONI & CO. INC. CITY OF EDINA . 8/28/2012 11:48:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Couricil Check Register Page - 10 8/30/2012 -8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 101,157.21 ZAMBONI ICE RESURFACER 295869 41975 5500.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 101,157.21 362982 813012012 130784 FREITAG, JENNIFER 275.00 8/5 RENTAL REFUND 295588 081712 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 275.00 362983 813012012 130596 FRONTIERSMAN SPORTS INC. 2,455.00 SHOTGUNS 00003042 295822 63888 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,455.00 362984 8130/2012 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION'& MFG IN 754.45 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 295870 40241 5521:6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 2,410.00 COMPRESSOR REBUILD 295871 40238 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 3,164.45 362985 8/3012012 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 251.16 VEHICLE GRAPHICS 00005294 '295558 82317 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 251.16 362986 813012012 101103 GRAINGER 10.32 BULBS 00002178 295872 9884079899 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 53.46 POWER SPONGE 00002187.- 295873 9890880553. 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 6.91 ADAPTER HOSE, WATER KEY 00002187'' 295874 ,9891879182 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH - OPERATIONS 56.00 COLD PACKS 00002185 295875 9894182501 5710.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 49.10 RESPIRATOR MASKS, BANDAGES 00005501 295876 9904432706 _ 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,852.73 TOOLS FOR SOT 00003845 295932 9890685606 1470.6406 GENERAL'SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,028.52 362987 8130/2012 102202 GRAND VIEW LODGE 210.00 CONFERENCE LODGING 295823 MNSCIA 1400.6104 CONFERENCES.& SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 210.00 362988 8/3012012 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00005554 295561 42220 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.95 362989 8130/2012 120.201 GRANICUS INC. 693.55 MONTHLY MANAGED SERVICE 295559 '37822 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 295560 37899 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,193.55 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/3012012 -8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO N. Doc No Inv No Account No 362990 8/30/2012 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 3,672.00 295753 142974 5862.5513 2,666.50 295967 142975 5842.5513 218.25 295968 142895 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page - 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 6,756.75 362991 8/3012012 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 430.49 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00001051 295562 123049 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 430.49 362992 813012012 130786 GREGORY, MARY 119.66 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 295589 082112 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.66 362993 8130/2012 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 104.88 BALL BEARINGS, TIRE 00001802 295563 111861 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS- EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.25 EQUIPMENT_ REPAIR 00001875 295564 112315 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 155.13 i 362994 813012012 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 112.20 OCE PAPER 295877 290836 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 112.20 362995 8/3012012 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 26.72 FIELDSTONES 295631 JULY2012 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 132.97 TROWELS 295631 JULY2012 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 143.09 SOD, DIRT 295631 JULY2012 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 643.44 MULCH, PERENNIALS 295631 JULY2012 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,739.18 SOD, BLACK DIRT 295631 JULY2012 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 2,685.40 362996 813012012 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 176.19 THERMAL PAPER 00007515 295824 110551 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 176.19 362997 8130/2012 130781 HAMPTON INN 87.40 LODGING - TRAINING 295590 86830185 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 87.40 362998 8/3012012 103884 HANCO CORPORATION 169.93 DIGITAL INFLATOR 00005511 295878 635643 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 169.93 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Council Check Register Page - 12 8/3012012 —8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 362999 813012012 101255 HASLER INC. 318.61 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 00004009 295591 15997424 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 318.61 363000 813012012 129497 HASTINGS, DAVID 240.38 INCLUSION SERVICES 295592 082012 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 240.38 363001 813012012 100797 HAWKINS INC. 236.81 CHLORINE 295879 3374292 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 236.81 363002 613012012 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 11,779.86 PREMIUM 295632 41108262 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 936.74 295633 41102053 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 12,716.60 363003 813012012 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 295635 024060 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 295636 024064 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 153.12 BEEF PATTIES 295880 024070 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 459.36 363004 8130/2012 130799 HENKELMANN, KARL 63.95 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 295933 4840 RUTLEDGE 590D.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 63.95 363005 8/3012012 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 6,546.00 ROOM & BOARD 295881 1000019587 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 6,546.00 363006 813012012 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 546.12 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00001050 295565 120738076 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,068.60 RADIO ADMIN FEE 295634 120738014 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,614.72 363007 8/3012012 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 51,956.14 OFFICE REMODELING 295593 500524 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 51,956.14 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2012 - 8/3012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description.. 363008 813012012 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 655.17 PC 00004354 295566 51644854 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 655.17 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6200 363009 8/30/2012 104332 HILL, PRISCILLA 1550.6200 INSURANCE 75375 FALL SCHEDULE DESIGN 295825 082112 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 753.75 363010 8/3012012 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 737.44 FIELD PAINT 00001010 295637 095244 737.44 i 363011 8130/2012 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,817.00 295702 613574 1,801.50 295754 613243 1,149.00 295755 613245 5,767.50 363012 8130/2012 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 123,037.00 WORKER'S COMP INS 295826 132116 21,369.00 BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE INS 295827 132114 3,647.00 INLAND MARINE INS 1 295828 132115 44,477.00 GENERAL LIABILITY INS 295829 133507 482.00- BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE INS' OOCREDIT 295830 133559 4,122.00- WORKER'S COMP INS OOCREDIT 295831 133619 187,926.00 363013 8/30/2012 128368 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 169.91 TONER CARTRIDGE 295567 IN- 000190157 285.60 TONER CARTRIDGES 295567 IN- OOD190157 304.54 MAINTENANCE KIT 295567 IN- 000190157 51.82 SUPPLIES FOR IT DEPT 00004353 295832 IN- 000203612 811.87 363014 8130/2012 130793 INSPEC 1,500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 00007153 295882 212537 -1 1,500.00 363015 813012012 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 27.24 INTERNET/WEBSITE 295883 9998296 27.24 1642.6544 LINE MARKING,POWDER 8/28/z...t 11:48:42 Page - 13 Business Unit 'ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIELD MAINTENANCE 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Council Check Register Page - 14 8/30/2012 - 8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 363016 813012012 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 114.09 ANIMAL CONTROL PATCHES 295594 31057 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 114.09 363017 813012012 118275 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 57.00 STAMPS 295934 193459 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 57.00 363018 813012012 121075 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 52.56 TOILET SERVICE 00001689 295638 56952 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 79.10 TOILET SERVICE 295884 56950 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 79.10 295885 56951 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 210.76 363019 813012012 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 8,034.74 295756 1875868 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 77.60 295757 1875869 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 36.00 295758 1875870 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,198.90 295969 1875865 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 295970 1875866 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 11,368.74 363021 813012012 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 140.24 295703 1368395 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,502.10 295704 1368107 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 797.57 295705 1368106 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 307.92 295706 1368103 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 41.40- 295707 545174 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.70- 295708 545173 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 378.73 295759 1373026 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 121.12 295760 1373031 5662.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .56 295761 1373013 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,220.64 295762 1373027 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 560.51 295763 1373029 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,733.03 295764 1373030 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,413.04 295765 1373028 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,590.36 295766 1373024 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.99 295767 1373025 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 628.96 295768 1373015 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 389.61 295769 1373008 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 441.12- 295770 545175 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 29.12- 295771 545176 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/28/2 L- 11:48:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 8/3012012 - 8/3012012 Check # Dale Amount Supplier_ /, Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 40.00- 295772 544221 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,044.97 295971 1373016 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 667.74 295972 1373014 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,747.96 295973 1373009 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 210.33 295974 1374156 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 634.70 295975 1374154 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,49 295976 1373011 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,331.30 295977 1373019 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,936.86 295978 1373022 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,604.61 295979 1373021 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,591.78 295980 1373023 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 66.74 295981 1373020 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 715.34 295982 1373018 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,121,09 295983 1373017 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 112,12 295984 1373010 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 37,12 295985 1373012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 189.51 295986 1374155 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 683.00 295987 1373453 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 44,935.70 363022 813012012 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 32.14 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 295935 082212 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 53.65 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMi ENT 295935 082212 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 75.91 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 295935 082212 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 144.62 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 295935 082212 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 306.32 363023 8/3012012 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY - 67.04 FAN MOTOR 00001929 295639 159244 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 67.04 363024 813012012 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 147.89 VACUUM REPAIR 00006056 295886 2922 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 147.89 363025 8130/2012 130789 KATZ, DAVID 214.23 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 295833 082312 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 214.23 363026 813012012 111018 KEEPRS INC. 285.58 UNIFORMS 00003811 295640 193047 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 99.99 00003811, 295641 193047 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Council Check Register Page - 16 8/30/2012 —8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 91.78 00003811 295642 193047 -04 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 477.35 363027 813012012 126953 KIMM, RYAN 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 9/06/12 295643 082012 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 363028 8130/2012 101936 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 268.00 PRO LASER III REPAIR 295595 467571 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 268.00 363029 813012012 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 11,230.00 POND TREATMENTS 00001906 295644 95424 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 11,230.00 363030 813012012 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 46.25 REIMBURSE FOR FUEL 295887 082412 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 46.25 363031 813012012 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 132.90 COPIER CONTRACT 00001045 295568 1441679 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.90 363032 8/3012012 130790 LUPO, JOHN 120.00 2 REFUNDS FOR REMBRANDT TRIP 295834 082012 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 120.00 363033 813012012 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,148.91 295709 137388 5662.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,148.91 363034 8130/2012 129667 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 3,337.50 MILLING BITS 00001918 295569 8562 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,337.50 363035 8130/2012 103206 MIA ASSOCIATES INC. 697.34 KLEEN AND SHINE 00003836 295645 4677 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 697.34 363036 8/3012012 130785 MARTIN, MIRANDA 106.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 295596 5030 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CIR Subledger Account Description ADVERTISING PERSONNEL FIRST AID SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TRIPS PROF SERVICES TRIPS PROF SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAC CHARGES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CHEMICALS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 8/28/2012 "11:48:42 Page - 17 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF FIRE TOWER WATER TREATMENT CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 8/30/2012 —8130/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 106.88 363037 813012012 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 800.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT EVALUATIONS 295646 7996 1550.6121 800.00 i 363038 813012012 122554 MATHESON T 1-GAS INC. 322.66 OXYGEN 00003649 295647 05289142 1470.6510 322.66 363039 813012012 101146 MATRIX 399.26 295936 607996650 1550.6188 399.26 363040 813012012 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 58.75 GRAPE ESCAPE TRIP 295648 ADD PASSENGER 1628.6103.07 2,194.50 REMBRANDT TRIP 295649 082012 1628.6103.07 2,253.25 363041 813012012 101483 MENARDS 376.05 SPRAYER, SWEEPER, HEAT GUN 00008075 295888 17079 5511.6406 25.56 AIR BLOW GUNS, AIR HOSES 00001043 295889 17542 1552.6406 401.61 363042 813012012 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 60,875.10 JULY 2012 SAC 1 295570 082012 1495.4307 60,875.10 363043 813012012 104650 MICRO CENTER 16.02 SUPPLIES FOR IT DEPT 00004358 295835 4032437 1554.6406 16.02 363044 813012012 I 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 434.02 TOWELS, TISSUE, CLEANERS 00003855 295650 33389 1470.6406 434.02 363045 '8130/2012 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 39.57 CO2, METHANE AIR 295890 171046922 7413.6545 39.57 363046 813012012 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,101.00 CONNECTION FEE 295597 081512 5915.6136 Subledger Account Description ADVERTISING PERSONNEL FIRST AID SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TRIPS PROF SERVICES TRIPS PROF SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAC CHARGES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CHEMICALS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 8/28/2012 "11:48:42 Page - 17 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF FIRE TOWER WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Council Check Register Page - 18 8/30/2012 —8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22,101.00 363047 813012012 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 419.45 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 295651 19207 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 419.45 363048 813012012 102487 MNISCIA 180.00 REGISTRATION - MIKE LUTZ 295598 00392 1400.6104 CONFERENCES $ SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 180.00 363049 813012012 102169 MOONLIGHT SERENADERS 50.00 8/06/2012 CONCERT 295836 082012 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50.00 363050 8/3012012 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 157.13 SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY 00005553 295571 505960FBW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.13 363051 813012012 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 103.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 295914 082412 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 103.00 363052 8/3012012 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,500.00 WEDDING GUIDE AD 295652 W277650 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,500.00 363053 813012012 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 493.57 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002088 295572 867376 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 253.56 IRRIGATION CONTROLLER 00002088 295573 867385 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 747.13 363054 813012012 130798 MUNDY, TJ 177.44 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 295937 7700 GLASGOW DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 177.44 363055 813012012 100916 MUZAK LLC 273.55 INSTALL AND CONNECT SPEAKER 295837 F31801 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY - 273.55 363056 813012012 104350 NIKE USA INC. 62.68 MERCHANDISE 295938 943304520 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 62.68 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 363067 813012012 363058 813012012 363059 8/30/2012 363060 8/30/2012 363061 813012012 363062 813012012 363063 813012012 363064 8/3012012 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2012 -8/30/2012 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 116.84 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001885 295653 5046102 116.84 100933 ,NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 166.59 CANVAS PANELS, SKETCH PADS 00009072 295891 42809300 166.59 118114 OCE 168.00 JULY MAINTENANCE 295892 987775880 184.20 AUG MAINTENANCE 295893 987802649 352.20 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 203.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00006034 295654 1493168676 80.31 INK, STORAGE BOXES 295655 1495119954 236.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00002191 295894 620715278001 179.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00008073 295895 620451097001 700.52 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 431.78 HOIST INSPECTIONS 00005290 295838 503151 431.78 HOIST INSPECTIONS 00005290 295838 503151 170.45 CHAIN SLING 00005297 295896 503057 111.57 CHAIN, SNAPS 00005513 295897 503113 1,145.58 101439 OLSEN FIRE INSPECTION 245.00 FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION 00001886 295656 0021207171 245.00 130800 ORR, TOM 210.00 BRAEMAR ICE REIMBURSEMENT 295939 082012 210.00 100347 PAUSTIS & SOI 2,135.00 33.25 2,236.70 300.87 80.25- 1646.6406 5120.5510 1495.6103 1495.6103 5410.6513 5410.6513 5710.6513 5510.6406 Subledger Account Desciiption GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5501.4556 ICE RENTAL 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page - 19 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE ICE ARENA REVENUES JS 295710 8363127 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295711 8363128 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 295773 8363130 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295774 8363126 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 295988 8363048 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WME YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 4,625.57 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2012 - 8/30/2012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page- 20 363065 813012012 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 628.87 295657 76398652 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 40.55- CREDIT ACCT 5601718 295658 72666524ADJ 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 433.90 295712 75141792 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 560.56 295898 76398653 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,582.78 363066 8/3012012 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC 75.00 POSTER DESIGN 295940 081512A 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 75.00 363067 813012012 103512 PETTY CASH 20.41- PETTY CASH 295808 082212 1400.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.33 PETTY CASH 295808 082212 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 78.79 PETTY CASH 295808 082212 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 123.15 PETTY CASH 295808 082212 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 387.05 PETTY CASH 295808 082212 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 628.91 363069 8130/2012 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 328.00 295713 287681 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 279.15 295714 2287423 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 578.08 295715 2287422 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 389.60 295716 2287421 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 182.54 295775 2290750 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .28 295776 2290744 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 286.72 295777 2290749 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,972.32 295778 2290757 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,388.51 295779 2290758 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 501.10 295780 2290756 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .28 295781 2290748 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 36.00- 295782 3487520 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 142.45- 295783 3487970 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 786.48 295989 2290753 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .28 295990 2290746 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 883.04 295991 2290747 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,614.58 295992 2290754 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,764.59 295993 2290755 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 62.12 295994 2291444 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,063.23 295995 2290745 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/28/2u iz 11:48:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 8/30/2012 — 8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account, Description Business Unit 377.20 295996 2290751 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16,279.65 363070 8/3012012 100953 PHYSIO -CONTROL INC. 267.70 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003837 295661 113034591 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 267.70 363071 8/3012012 100119 PING 202.83 GOLF CLUBS 295941 11422530 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 202.83 363072 8/3012012 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 280.00 295784 16208 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 280.00 363073 8/30/2012 130174 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 2,443.50 FIELD PAINT 00001863 295659 INV452030 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 2,443.50 363074 8130/2012 123092 PLAYPOWER Li FARMINGTON INC 729.96 PLAYGROUND PARTS 00001733 295660 1400167226 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 729.96 363075 8130/2012 130573 PRIME SOURCE ONE -LLC 28.95 PICKLEBALLS 295899 82412 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 28.95 363076 813012012 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 348.25 WIPERS, TISSUE, LINERS 00008077 295900 5737 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 348.25 363077 8130/2012 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 1,298.52 TEST /REPLACE VALVESIi 295901 14290 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,298.52 363078 8/3012012 125936 REINDERS INC 2,859.98 FERTILIZER 00001872 295662 3016773 -00 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 74.35- CREDIT 295663 3016595 -00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,785.63 363079 813012012 130782 RETAIL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1 490.00 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 295599 081712 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 71.25 CITY OF EDINA 363082 813012012 GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET Council Check Register 2,495.53 8/30/2012 —8/3012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 363083 490.00 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 363080 8130/2012 108.40 105631 RICHFIELD BUS COMPANY PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 295902 001449 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED115655 571.25 CHANHASSEN BUS TRIP 295664 13007 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 363084 571.25 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 363081 813012012 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 295915 082412 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page- 22 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS 71.25 295717 19438 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING TREES & MAINTENANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 775.00 CARS FOR TRAINING 295666 5355,5354,5307 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 775.00 363086 813012012 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 185.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 71.25 082112 363082 813012012 GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 2,495.53 ATHLETIC TURF SERVICES 00001888 295665 63589 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,495.53 130788 SEDGWICK HEATING & A/C 363083 8130/2012 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 108.40 73.04 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 295902 001449 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED115655 1495.4115 73.04 INSPECTIONS 363084 813012012 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 77.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 295915 082412 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 101556 SHRED4T USA MINNEAPOLIS 77.25 363085 813012012 44.20 106506 SCHMIT TOWING INC. TREES & MAINTENANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 775.00 CARS FOR TRAINING 295666 5355,5354,5307 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 775.00 363086 813012012 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 185.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 295600 082112 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 185.00 363087 813012012 130788 SEDGWICK HEATING & A/C 108.40 PERMIT REFUND 295839 ED115655 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 108.40 363088 813012012 101556 SHRED4T USA MINNEAPOLIS 44.20 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 295903 8120010028 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.20 363089 8130/2012 106654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 644.00 FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION 295904 68065911 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 644.00 363092 813012012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,278.29 3,827.00 867.50 20.00- 428.50 8.64 1,738.22 1,257.00 2,872.16 731.50 1,024.50 746.90 1,943.00 17,685.93 363093 8/3012012 363094 8130/2012 102698 SPOONER, 22.10 MILEAGE 22.10 104672 E .60 1.80 17.26 23.40 39.00 39.00 47.82 52.05 52.06 52.40 57.00 65.40 150.80 8/28/20 i 2 11:48:42 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 1655239 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295720 1880480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register . 295721 1849982 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/30/2012 -8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 363090 8/3012012 1846349 106415, SKYHAWK$'SPORTS ACADEMY INC. YORK SELLING 295785 2,659.00 SKYHAWK PROGRAMS 295574 324222919 1624.6406 295786 2,659.00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 363091 8130/2012 1855238 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY VERNON SELLING 295788 1,090.00 REGISTRATION FEES 295667 8782 1400.6104 295789 1,090.00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 363092 813012012 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,278.29 3,827.00 867.50 20.00- 428.50 8.64 1,738.22 1,257.00 2,872.16 731.50 1,024.50 746.90 1,943.00 17,685.93 363093 8/3012012 363094 8130/2012 102698 SPOONER, 22.10 MILEAGE 22.10 104672 E .60 1.80 17.26 23.40 39.00 39.00 47.82 52.05 52.06 52.40 57.00 65.40 150.80 8/28/20 i 2 11:48:42 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 295718 1859399 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 295719 1655239 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295720 1880480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295721 1849982 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295722 1846309 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295723 1846349 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 295785 1859395 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 295786 1846310 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295787 1855238 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS•SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295788 1880481 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295789 1855240 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 295790 1859396 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 295997 1855301 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295601 082212 5110.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 295747 873184124 -117 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 295747 873184124117 5511.6188 TELEPHONE' ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 295747 873184124117 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 295747 873184124117 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 295747 873184124117 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 295747 873184124117 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 295747 873184124117 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT'SERV GEN - MIS 295747 873184124117 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 295747 873184124117 1490.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH 295747 873184124117 1240.6188 TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 295747 873184124117 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 295747 873184124117 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 295747 873184124117 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8128/2012 11:48:42 Council Check Register Page - 24 8/30/2012 - 8130/2012 Check # Dale Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 160.57 295747 873184124 -117 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 265.99 295747 873184124 -117 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 305.63 295747 873184124 -117 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 473.58 295747 873184124 -117 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 546.20 295747 873184124 -117 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 719.82 295747 873184124 -117 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,640.10 295747 873184124 -117 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,710.48 363095 813012012 116176 ST. CROIX HARLEY- DAVIDSON 317.32 VEHICLE REPAIRS 295602 630060 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 317.32 363096 813012012 105352 STEPHENSON, TED 51.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 295840 082012 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 51.84 363097 813012012 101015 STREICHERS 27.78 SHOTGUN SHELL HOLDER 295603 1951584 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 27.78 363098 813012012 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 966.92 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005502 295575 614833 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,697.81 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005506 295942 612236 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,664.73 363099 813012012 130787 SUPERIOR MECHANICAL 157.50 WATER HEATER MAINTENANCE 295668 51364 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 157.50 363100 8/3012012 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 376.00 295724 004791 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 533.00 295791 004833 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 909.00 363101 8/3012012 130796 TAPPE, JAY 150.00 FOR FLOWRIDER COMPETITION 295943 DJ SERVICES 5330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FLOWRIDER 150.00 363102 813012012 101027 TARGET BANK 25.64 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 295905 081812 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 25.64 CITY OF EDINA 8/281;L'.- 0:48:42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 8/30/2012 -8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descriptlon Business Unit 363103 8/30/2012 104932 TAYLOR MADE 455 35 MERCHANDISE 295944 18431419 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 363109 6130/2012 455.35 103277 TITAN MACHINERY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 44.88 363104 8/3012012 113549;. TENNIS WEST 44.88 363110 813.0120.12 6,370.00 RESURFACE TENNIS COURTS 00001861 295671 12- 077837 1647.6103 295947 0880003 6,370.00 667.57 363111 813012012 363105 8130/2012 121253 THAYER, LARRY 114.00 295725 749611 116.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 295945 082312 1652.6107 129403 TRAUN, MARKI 116.55 363106 813012012 130783 THEIS, BYRON 75.07 REIMBURSEMENT 295604 CARD, CABLE 1260.6406 75.07 363107 8/30/2012 130301 THEMEDESIGN INC 3,850.00 AQUATIC CTR SHIPWRECK REPAIRS 295953 ED- 2012 -03 5311.6180 3,850.00 363108 813012012 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 131.40 295669 707409 5421.5514 150.00 295670 00773857 5421.5514 134.30 295792 708509 5862.5515 64.50 295793 708510 5862.5514 a_1s1.15 295794 708508 5862.5514 363109 6130/2012 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 103277 TITAN MACHINERY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 44.88 TERMINALS 00005586 295946 9CO7079 44.88 363110 813.0120.12 101474 TITLEIST 667.57 GOLF BALLS 295947 0880003 667.57 363111 813012012 128347 TKO;WINES.INC. 114.00 295725 749611 114.00 363112 8/3012012 129403 TRAUN, MARKI 1553.6530 5440.5511 5842.5513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS PATHS 8 HARD SURFACE WEED MOWING ENGINEERING GENERAL POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Council Check Register Page - 26 8/30/2012 -8/30/2012 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 206.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 295916 082412 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 206.00 363113 813012012 106325 TRAVELERS 340.00 OVERPAID WORKERS' COMP 295948 REFUND 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 340.00 363114 813012012 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 90.85 WEED CONTROL 00001884 295672 150149 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 112.22 LAWN SERVICE 00001893 295949 150154 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 203.07 363116 813012012 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 139.28 DOOR REPAIR PARTS 00001864 295673 532589 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.56 DOOR REPLACEMENT PARTS 295906 531607 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 61.36 295907 532110 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 220.20 363116 813012012 101049 UHL COMPANY 1,181.50 HVAC REPAIRS 295674 14210 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,181.50 363117 8130/2012 104241 UNIVERSAL SIGNS INC 688.70 SIGN REPAIR SERVICE 295841 46102 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 688.70 363118 8130/2012 101056 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 65.00 REGISTER 45528238 MARK SPAIN 295950 1064475 -4552823 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 8 65.00 363119 8130/2012 100050 USPS - HASLER 8,000.00 #75983 295908 082712 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,000.00 363120 813012012 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 513.34 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 295576 245077 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 158.04 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 295577 245077 -01 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 26.80- CREDIT 295578 243848CM 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 614.13 TISSUE, TOWELS, CUPS 295675 24566400 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 77.73 PAPER PLATES, UTENSILS 295842 24427400 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 722.37 LIQUOR BAGS 295842 24427400 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2012 -813012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 74.09 CAN LINERS 295843 245661 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.09 - CAN LINERS 295844 244274 -01 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.09 CUP LIDS 295909 245664 -01 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,255.08 2,660.00 GOLF CART RENTAL 295910 63899 5423.6216 363121 8130/2012 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 4;740.00 32.78 295579 2784602027 5952.6188 TELEPHONE 102.33 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 295579 2784602027 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 117.56 295579 2784602027 1130.6188 TELEPHONE 28678 PLANNING 295579 2784602027 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 8/28/2012 11:48:42 Page - 27 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL RECYCLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 539.45 363122 813012012 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 2,080.00 GOLF CART RENTAL 00006016 295676 63665 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 2,660.00 GOLF CART RENTAL 295910 63899 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 4;740.00 363123 813012012 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 1,500.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 295580 212023 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 1,500.00 363124 813012012 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 347.95 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001843 295677 15208652 -01 1646.6578 LAMPS ✓f FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 115.85 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001913 295678 15209201 -00 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 126.76 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001913 295678 15209201 -00 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 590.56 363125 813012012 103410 W.W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC. 575.00 PARTS /SERVICE TO REPAIR PUMP 295911 89064 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 575.00 363126 8130/2012 101071 WALLIN, JOHN 225.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 295581 080312 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 111.56 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 295582 082012 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 336.56 363127 813012012 129142 WALLY'S SERVICE STATION INC. 31.86 NON - OXYGENATED GAS 00003576 295679 081512 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 31.86 363128 8/3012012 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 250.60 LEAK LOCATING 295605 3340 05524.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY ESTATES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation YORK SELLING 295727 250.60 5822.5513 363129 813012012 295795 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 62.16 TRIP EXPENSES 307722 -00 5862.5513 100.59 TRIP EXPENSES 295999 307561 -00 162.75 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 363130 813012012 58713 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,365.10 420812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 96.00 296001 420814 5842.5513 1,323.80 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 92.00 295735 827682 5842.5512 246.30 YORK SELLING 34.53 295801 3,123.20 5822.5515 363131 813012012 2,645.12 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 791961 5822.5512 1,314.76 BOTH ST SELLING 86.15 295803 925.59 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,731.66 295804 791957 5862.5513 3,468.40 VERNON SELLING 5,833.79 295805 485.60 - 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 485.60- 295806 866326 5862.5513 1,458.48 VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2012 -8/3012012 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 295606 MAAP 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 295606 MAAP 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS Business Unit ASSESSING ASSESSING 8/2812012 11:48:42 Page- 28 295726 307423 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295727 30684400 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 295795 307570 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295998 307722 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295999 307561 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 295728 419981 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 295796 420811 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 295797 420815 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295798 420813 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295799 58725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 295800 58713 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 296000 420812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 296001 420814 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 363132 8/3012012 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,067.45 295729 790349 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 67.64 295730 791965 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12,737.27 295731 791964 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,662.29 295732 791963 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,405.15 295733 790301 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 299.00- 295734 866333 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 919.20- 295735 827682 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 34.53 295801 791962 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,645.12 295802 791961 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 86.15 295803 791958 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,059.90 295804 791957 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,833.79 295805 791959 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 676.20- 295806 866326 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,616.17 296002 791960 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 15.83- 296003 867096 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 363135 813012012 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. Council Check Register DIESEL FUEL 00005279 295912 494837 2,233.71 813012012 -8/3012012 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 36,305.23 2959 2,214.37 363133 813012012 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER, 1,483.44 1,068.80 295745 295680 942608 5421.5514 COST OF.GOODS SOLD BEER 136.00 1,869.94 295736 943192 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,479.75 295737 943191 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 107.70 295738 '942797 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX .03 295739 942795 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER .03 295740 942794 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,715.95 295741 942796 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,597.05 295742 943791 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 86.00 295743 943792 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 342.00 295744 943793 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,625.20 295746 942550 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5,566.50 296004 946013 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 21.50 296005 945783 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,853.30 296006 945782 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 240.00 296007 946034 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 452.00 296008 9458333 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 24,292.81 363134 8/3012012 101726 XCEL ENERGY 13,283.40 51- 6644819 -9 295951 337276916 5720.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER 13,283.40 363135 813012012 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 2,233.71 DIESEL FUEL 00005279 295912 494837 2,233.71 363136 8/30/2012 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 2,214.37 GAME DESIGN 295952 2959 2,214.37 363137 813012012 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 1,483.44 295745 11309 386.50 295807 11302 1,869.94 947,714.27 Grand Total 1552.6186 5125.6103 HEAT 8/28/202 11:48:42 Page - 29 Business Unit GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING BOTH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Payment Instrument Totals Check Total - 947,714.27 Total Payments 947,714.27 YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 8/30/2012 - 8/3012012 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 522,058.71 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 268.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 7,354.62 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,709.31 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 6,884.53 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 21,330.91 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 106,058.10 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 14,417.95 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,172.14 05800 LIQUOR FUND 215,596.44 05900 UTILITY FUND 24,812.82 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 12,424.00 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.78 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 10,593.96 Report Totals 947,714.27 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policle ' and procedures �51D I 8128/2012 11:49:31 Page- 1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To- MAYOR AND COUNCIL — Agenda Item Item No. IV. C. Revised From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -100 Setting Public Hearing Dates For Special Assessments & Utility Certification - ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Every year the City holds special assessment public hearings for the purpose of considering the various improvement and maintenance projects undertaken throughout the City of Edina which will be specially assessed against the benefitted property owners. In order to hold the hearing, the Council must adopt a resolution calling them. Staff recommends that the hearing be set on October 2, 2012, for the following improvements: Aquatic Weeds — Imp. No. AQ -12 Weed Mowing — Imp. No. WD -12 Tree Removal — Imp. No. TR -12 50th & France — Improvement M -12 Grandview Square — Improvement G -12 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Reconstruction - Improvement No. BA434 Golf Terrace Neighborhood ` Reconstruction — Improvement _No. BA -355 West 70th Street Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement Nos. BA-367 & A -241 Carson's Hill Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No.: BA -370 Killarney Shores Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -371 McCauley Heights Neighborhood Reconstruction - ,Improvement No. BA -372 Oscar Robe srt Neighborhood Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -373 : West 44th Street Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -383 Ridge Road Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -384 The public hearing for the certification of delinquent utilities DU -12 should also be set on October 2, 2012 ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2012 -100 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-100 CALLING PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND DELINQUENT UTILITIES ON OCTOBER 2, 2012 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 2nd day of October, 2012, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment, and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such Improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to assessments for the following projects: Aquatic Weeds — Imp. No. AQ -12 Weed Mowing — Imp. No. WD -12 Tree Removal — Imp. No. TR -12 50th & France — Improvement M -12 Grandview Square — Improvement G -12 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -334 Golf Terrace Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -355 West 70th Street Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement Nos. BA -367 & A -241 Carson's Hill Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -370 Killarney Shores Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -371 McCauley Heights Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -372 Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -373 West 44th Street Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -383 Ridge Road Neighborhood Reconstruction — Improvement No. BA -384 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 2 "d day of October, 2012, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such certification of Delinquent Utilities - DU -12, and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such certification will be given an opportunity to be heard. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that the City Clerk is directed to publish and mail notices of the aforementioned public hearings. ADOPTED this 4t" day of September 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 20_ City Clerk o Le REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.D. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Set 2013 Budget and Levy Public Hearing, and Budget and Levy Adoption Meeting ACTION REQUESTED: recommend that the City Council set Tuesday, December 4 at 7:00 p.m. for the Budget and Levy Meeting public hearing and Tuesday, December 18, at 7:00 p.m. for the Budget and Levy Adoption Meeting. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The 2009 legislature changed the Truth in Taxation (TNT) process. Cities must figure out which regularly scheduled meeting after November 24, 2012 will include discussion of the city budget at which the final budget and levy will be adopted. Cities must announce information about this meeting and note it in council minutes, and provide the same specific meeting information to county auditors on or before September 15. The law now requires that at a regularly scheduled meeting at which the City Council adopts a proposed tax levy, the City .Council must also announce the time. and place of the Council meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed — and a final budget and levy will'be determined. The meeting must not be held before 6 p.m. and the public must be allowed to speak at this meeting before the final budget and levy is adopted. Council may adopt a final budget at this meeting, but is not required to do so. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.E. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -101 Changing The Precinct Boundaries Between Precincts 2 & 3 ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Last week the City was notified that the Secretary of State's Office found an error in the boundary line between Congressional Districts 3 and 5 within the City of Edina. When the map data was loaded into the redistricting software the dividing line was placed on TH100, however, that was incorrect. The line actually extends westerly of Highway 100 along West 44th Street. This means that about 40 households that previously were in Edina's Precinct 2 and subsequent Congressional District 3 must be moved to their correct Congressional District. These properties must be moved into Edina Precinct 3. Staff has prepared a resolution and map depicting the requested changes. Once the attached resolution has been adopted by the Council, Hennepin County will send postal notifications to every registered voter affected by the change. In addition, Edina staff will send a first class letter explaining the change to every address affected in October. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2012 -101 2012 Precinct Map Revised 9/4/2012 RESOLUTION 2012 -101 APPROVING ELECTION BOUNDARIES AND POLLING LOCATIONS WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 204B.14 the governing body of each municipality shall establish the boundaries of the election precincts in the municipality; WHEREAS, precinct boundaries must be reestablished within 60 days of the time when the legislature has been redistricted or at least 19 weeks before the state primary in a year ending in two, whichever comes first; BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Min. nesota, that it hereby establishes boundaries for each precinct as illustrated on the map presented at the regular meeting of September 4, 2012, and defined as follows: Precinct No. 2 - Commencing at the intersection of the northern boundary of the City of Edina and the north -south NSP power line (northwest corner of Section 28, Township 117, Range 21); thence southerly along the centerline of the north -south NSP power line to Vernon Avenue (County Road 158); thence northeasterly along the centerline of Vernon Avenue to the centerline of Eden Avenue; thence northeasterly along the centerline of Eden Avenue to the centerline of State Highway 100, thence northerly along the centerline of State Highway 100 to the centerline of West 44th Street, thence westerly along the centerline of West 44th Street to the centerline of Minnehaha Creek, thence southwest along the centerline of Minnehaha Creek to the extension of the north line of Lot 29, Brookside Terrace, thence west, north and westerly along the north line of Lot 29, Brookside Terrace to the centerline of Brookside Terrace, thence north along the centerline of Brookside Terrace to the centerline of West 44th Street, thence west along the centerline of West 44th Street to the centerline of Brookside Avenue, thence north along the centerline of Brookside Avenue to the northern boundary of the City of Edina; thence westerly along the northern boundary of the City of Edina to point of beginning. Precinct No. 3 - Commencing at the intersection of West 50th Street and Arden Avenue; thence northerly along the centerline of Arden Avenue to the centerline of Sunnyside Road; thence westerly along the centerline of Sunnyside Road to the centerline of Wooddale Avenue; thence northerly along the centerline of Wooddale Avenue to the northern boundary of the City of Edina; thence southwesterly and westerly along the northern boundary of the City of Edina to'the centerline of Brookside, Avenue, thence south along the centerline of Brookside Avenue to the centerline of West 44th Street, thence east along the centerline of West 44th Street to the centerline of Brookside Terrace, thence south along the centerline of Brookside Terrace to the extension of the north line of Lot 29, Brookside Terrace, thence east, south, easterly along the north line of Lot 29, Brookside Terrance to the centerline of Minnehaha Creek, thence northeasterly along the centerline of Minnehaha Creek to the centerline of West 44th Street, thence easterly along the centerline of West 44th Street to the centerline of State Highway 100; thence southerly along the centerline of State Highway 100 to the south fence line of the Edina Country Club (the south line of Section 18, Township 28, Range 24); thence easterly along the south fence line of the Edina Country Club to the intersection of Wooddale Ave and West 54th Street; thence easterly along the centerline of West 54th Street to the centerline of France Avenue; thence northerly along the centerline of France Avenue to the centerline of West 50th Street; thence westerly along the centerline of West 50th Street to point of beginning. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Resolution No. 2012 -101 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City Council of the City of Edina hereby establishes the following polling locations: Precinct 1A Shepherd of Hills Church 500 Blake Road Precinct 1B Chapel Hills Church 6512 Vernon Avenue Precinct 2 Edina Senior Center 5280 Grandview Square Precinct 3 Covenant Church of Edina 4201 West 501h Street Precinct 4 Weber Park Building 4115 Grimes Avenue Precinct 5 Highlands Elementary School 5505 Doncaster Way Precinct 6 Countryside Elementary School 5701 Benton Avenue Precinct 7 Normandale Lutheran Church 6100 Normandale Road Precinct 8 South View Middle School 4725 South View Lane Precinct 9 Concord Elementary School 5900 Concord Avenue Precinct 10 Creek Valley School 6401 Gleason Road Precinct 11 Creek Valley Baptist Church 6400 Tracy Avenue Precinct 12 Arneson Acres Park 4711 West 70th Street Precinct 13 Centennial Lakes Park Hughes 7499 France Avenue Pavilion Precinct 14 St. Peters Lutheran Church 5421 France Avenue So. Precinct 15 Valley View Middle School 6750 Valley View Road Precinct 16 Cornelia Elementary School 7000 Cornelia Drive Precinct 17 Southdale Hennepin Library 7001 York Avenue South Precinct 18 Edinborough Park Great Hall 7700 York Avenue South Precinct 19 Calvary Lutheran Church 6817 Antrim Road Passed and adopted this 4th day of September, 2012 Atte Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 4, 2012 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk SD 283 CITY LIMITS POLLING ' LOCATIONS PRECINCT BOUNDARIES SD 271 CITY OF EDINA 2012 PRECINCT MAP September 4, 2012 EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 BLOOMINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 271 HOPKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT 270 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT 272 RICHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT 280 ST. LOUIS PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT 283 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 31 Pcts, IA,1B,2,5 ,6,7,10,11,12,13,15,16,17,18,19 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 51 Pcts, 3,4,8,9,14 SENATE DISTRICT 491 All Precincts REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 49A1 Pcts. IA,1B,2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,14,15,16,17 REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 49B1 Pcts. 12,13,18,19 CITY OF EDINA POLLING LOCATIONS PRECINCT lA Shepherd of the Hills Church 500 Blake Road PRECINCT 1B Chapel Hills Church 6512 Vernon Avenue PRECINCT 2 Edina Senior Center 5280 Grandview Square (36) PRECINCT 3 Covenant Church of Edina 4201 W. 50th Street PRECINCT 4 Weber Park Building 4115 Grimes Avenue PRECINCT 5 Highlands School 5505 Doncaster Way PRECINCT 6 Countryside School 5701 Benton Avenue PRECINCT 7 Nornandale Lutheran Church 6100 Normandale Road PRECINCT 8 South View Middle School 4725 South View Lane PRECINCT 9 Concord School 5900 Concord Avenue PRECINCT 10 Creek Valley School 6401 Gleason Road PRECINCT 11 Creek Valley Baptist Church 6400 Tracy Avenue PRECINCT 12 Arneson Acres Park 4711 West 70th Street PRECINCT 13 Centennial Lakes Hughes PavlLion 7499 France Avenue So. PRECINCT 14 St. Peter's Lutheran Church 5421 France Avenue So. PRECINCT 15 Valley View Mlddle School 6750 Valley Vlew Road PRECINCT 16 Cornelia School 7000 Cornelia Drive PRECINCT 17 Southdale Hennepin Llbrary 7001 York Avenue So. PRECINCT 18 Edinborough Park 7700 York Avenue So. PRECINCT 19 Calvary Lutheran Church 6817 Antrim Road \•lam �• roRPOAA tees REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV:F. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Traffic Safety Report of August 1, 2012 ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the revised Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 1, 2012. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the August 1, 2012, Traffic Safety Committee Report at their August 16, 2012, meeting and made the following comments: Item Al: The ETC recommended adoption of the Temporary Speed Table that Commissioner Janovy presented. It is included in the revised report. Item A2: The ETC offered the following comments to the construction management plan, which will be forwarded to Community Development Director: Section 4: Consider referencing street bond and street closure permit. Does 3 -day rule (requiring damaged pavement) apply to projects with a street bond? Consider requiring notification of neighbors in advance of street or sidewalk closure (except emergency). Section 5: Revise to read: "All sections of Edina ordinance 1400.10 Parking, Stopping and Standing, Loading shall apply. Street parking is allowed on local streets as long as a minimum of a twelve -foot (12') wide area is open for the traveled portion of the road, unless otherwise authorized or restricted by the City engineer..." Item 132: The ETC moved this item to C1. Staff will bring back an engineering proposal along with a proposed public engagement process for this intersection and potentially the easterly corridor of Sunnyside Road. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports \Item IV. . Traffic Safety Report of August 1, 2012.doc ATTACHMENTS: Revised Traffic Safety Staff Committee Report for August 1, 2012. Draft Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of August 16, 2012. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \Clty Council Reports \Item IV. . Traffic Safety Report of August 1, 2012.doc TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT (Revised August 16, 2012) Wednesday, August 1, 2012 The Committee review of traffic safety matters occurred on August 1, 2012. The City Engineer, City Planner, and Traffic Safety Coordinator were in attendance for this meeting. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the August 16, 2012, Edina Transportation Commission and then the September 4, 2012 City Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval of request: 1. Staff reviewed changes to the Temporary Speed Table Policy. Staff reviewed changes made based on the recommendations of the ETC. These recommendations were made during the July 19, 2012 meeting. Staff recommends approval of the attached Temporary Speed Table Policy. 2. Request to review Construction Management Plan. This request was brought to the TSC to review recommendations by the ETC. Changes have been made to the Construction Management Plan based on recommendations from the ETC meeting of July 19. Additional recommendations were made at the ETC August 16 meeting. Staff recommends approval of the changes to the Construction Management Plan. 3. Request for parking restrictions to be moved to the other side of the street on McCauley Trail from Timber Ridge to Timber Trail. The requestor lives on McCauley Trail. The requestor has stated that allowing parking on the south side of the street is unsafe due to the narrow area allowed for parking. The resident would like parking restrictions to Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 1 of 8 August 1, 2012 be moved onto the south side, and remove the restrictions on the north side. The resident feels that the shoulder on the north side would be more appropriate for parked cars. Requestor also feels that the traffic speeds are too high for the area. McCauley Trail is classified as a collector street. There are a total of 4 recorded crashes from 2001 to 2010. Three of them are property damage, one is possible injury. The possible injury is due to a sideswipe. The City of Edina policy regarding parking restrictions requires present conditions that impacts traffic safety in order to restrict parking. Traffic counts were conducted in the area. Traffic speeds were monitored to gauge if speed was a factor in traffic safety. McCauley Trail has an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 1447 vehicles with an 85"' percentile speed of 36.8 MPH. A detailed speed report was sent to the EPD. Photos are provided below. PHOTO 1: McCauley Trail looking west Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 2 of 8 August 1, 2012 PHOTO 2: McCauley Trail looking westbound with car. Staff recommends approval of the changes to the parking restrictions on McCauley Trail West. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request: Request for parking restrictions in the area of Barrie Road. This request is from a manager at the Colony in Edina. The requestor feels that parking on the street is causing a traffic hazard. Requestor would like the whole area of Barrie Road from 66th Street West to Heritage Avenue to be looked at. Barrie Road is classified as a city street. Traffic counts taken on the street show an ADT of 1364 vehicles with an 85th of 29 MPH. There is one crash with relevance in the area (2008, collision with parked vehicle) on Barrie Road. The street is roughly 35 feet wide. The City of Edina policy regarding parking restrictions requires present conditions present that impacts traffic safety in order to restrict parking. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 3 of 8 August 1, 2012 ,t lww f w Nc �^ J ,t lww f N xlw li Cal uric Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request for an All -Way stop sign at the intersection of Sunnyside Road and Grimes Avenue. Requestor has directed staff to investigate this area for traffic safety concerns due to construction on 44th Street. Accurate traffic counts could not be established until construction ended. Requestor also would like to investigate the use of a permanent speed bump on Sunnyside Road. The policy for an All -Way stop sign requires at least 300 vehicles per hour entering the intersection for at least eight hours. Special consideration can be used for areas high in crashes that could be prevented with an All -Way stop sign. Due to the configuration of the intersection, 225 vehicles per hour should be considered for an all -way stop. Traffic counts were conducted in the area and traffic was monitored in order to determine the volume of vehicles at the intersection per hour. The highest number of hours with volume over 225 vehicles was three. This is below the warrants for an all -way stop sign. PHOTO 5: Sunnyside looking west Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 5 of 8 August 1, 2012 FIG Observations for Intersection Date: 06/01/12- 06/08/12 Tues Wed Thur Time 700 148 173 140 800 169 168 149 900 140 139 174 1000 148 127 191 1100 171 175 175 1200 186 150 187 1300 187 160 179 184 1400 196 177 1500 227 246 238 1600 309 348 372 1700 234 284 264 1800 153 159 182 1900 122 114 160 URF. 1 - Recorded volumes at Sunnvside and Grimes Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 6 of 8 August 1, 2012 SEC'T'ION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. 1. Request for traffic volumes and speeds in the area of Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue. Requestor was interested in the roads around the area as well. Requestor was given the most recent counts. 2. Request for traffic volumes and speeds in the area of 601h Street and Kellogg Avenue. Requestor was interested in the results of the recent count taken in the area to determine the warrants for a stop sign at that intersection. 3. Request for striping in the area of Xerxes Avenue and TH 62. Requestor wanted clarification with regards to the lanes on Xerxes Avenue heading south. Requestor was advised that Hennepin County was planning on striping the area in mid - August. 4. Call from a resident with "concerns" with the speed limit reduction on 701h Street. Resident feels that the speed is too slow for traffic to move effectively. Left voicemail for resident; resident has not called back. 5. Call from a resident to discuss a "safety hazard" in Edina. Left message for resident, resident has not called back. 6. Call from three residents inquiring about a "No Parking" sign on Xerxes Avenue north of TH 62. Residents were informed that the sign was not officially placed. Sign was removed. 7. Call from a resident requesting information about parking near a driveway entrance. Resident was informed of the City Code that pertains to parking near a driveway. 8. Call from a resident inquiring about an increase in traffic in the Country Club Neighborhood. Resident was advised. 9. Call from a resident asking about the increased traffic on Vernon Avenue. Resident was forwarded to Hennepin County. 10. Call from a resident about traffic speeds on 701h Street. Resident feels that traffic is not obeying the speed limit. Resident was informed about recent Police patrols and procedures for monitoring speed in the area. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 7 of 8 August 1, 2012 11. Call from a resident requesting the speeds to be looked at on Olinger Boulevard. Requestor feels that the construction on Tracy Avenue has shifted traffic onto Olinger Boulevard and the speeds have increased. Traffic counts were taken in the area. Olinger Boulevard has an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 2392 vehicles with an 85`h percentile speed of 32.0 MPH. A detailed speed report was sent to EPD. 12. Request for speeds to be looked at in the area of Xerxes Avenue. Requestor feels that the speeds on Xerxes Avenue are too high. Traffic counts are still being conducted at this time. A detailed speed report will be sent to EPD for monitoring. 13. Request for a crosswalk on Xerxes Avenue (no location indicated). Forwarded to Hennepin County. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 8 of 8 August 1, 2012 City of Edina PURPOSE: To temporarily reduce motor vehicle speeds on non - Municipal State Aid streets near or adjacent to current road construction projects. PROCESS: • Contact the Traffic Safety Coordinator. The Traffic Safety Coordinator will gather the pertinent facts to evaluate your request. • The City Engineer may direct the installation of temporary speed tables pursuant to this policy. POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MNMUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Temporary speed tables shall not be placed on Municipal State Aid roadways. 3. Placement of temporary speed tables shall be limited to roadways that are near or adjacent to current road construction projects. 4. Tables shall be installed for a period of time not to exceed the duration of the road construction project. 5. The placement of temporary speed tables shall be based on engineering judgment and be consistent with adopted City of Edina policies governing traffic calming and street design. 1 Plan View Cross Section CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR (For Office Use Only) Project Name & Site Address Number QR Code Permit Number The construction on this site will follow normal industry and City accepted construction methods for a project of this type. Specific items of concern will be addressed as noted below. Any references to start date or duration of specific items are estimated and.included only for reference. Construction management plans can also be found at: www.EdinaMNgov The undersigned hereby acknowledges that they are responsible for complying with the below conditions. Signature of Developer Developer: Address: Phone: Email Address: Signature of Contractor Site Contractor: Address: Phone: Email Address: The estimated construction start date is The estimated completion date is Date Date 2. Construction activities will be scheduled during the hours of,7:00 am to 9:00 pm Monday through Friday; and 8:00 am to 7:00 pm Saturday, Sunday and holidays per Section 1040.03'of the Edina City Code. 3. Before work begins on the site, a Contractor sign must be installed identifying the Contractor company name, a contact name and phone number and the site address. The sign may not exceed six (6) square feet in a single- family residential zoning district, and thirty-two (32) square feet in high density residential, commercial or industrial areas. A copy of this document must also be attached to the sign. The City can provide a laminated copy of this document. 4. The Contractor is responsible for repairing any damage to public streets or adjacent properties. The Contractor shall provide pictures of the existing condition of the curb, sidewalk and street, and any boulevard or border trees adjacent to the property prior to construction. When damage occurs or if pavement is disturbed, in must be repaired within three (3) working days, unless the Contractor has received written permission from city staff to delay repairs to a later specified date. The Contractor shall obtain written permission from the city engineer to block any roadways during any portion of the project. Street parking is allowed on Local Streets as long as a minimum of a twelve -foot (12') wide area is open for the traveled portion of the road, unless otherwise authorized by the city engineer. On streets Collector or Arterial Roadways, a minimum of twenty -two feet (22') must be open for the traveled portion of the road. The Contractor shall encourage off - street and off -site parking to workers on site. 6. Minnesota State Law requires a five -foot (5) parking setback from driveways and a thirty -foot (30) setback from intersections. When parking on a street, a vehicle must be completely located on the street surface, parallel to and within 12 inches of the curb. 7. The Contractor shall keep the site, all streets, all sidewalks, boulevard areas and adjacent properties clean from waste, materials or refuse resulting from his operations on the site. Equipment not usable on the work site shall be promptly removed and the site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition at all times. All empty cans, paper, plastic, etc. that is not needed for construction shall be removed and cleaned from the site every evening prior to leaving the construction site. Where work on any project lies within areas of pedestrian traffic and /or vehicular traffic the project area will be cleaned and swept and all materials related to the project will be stockpiled in appropriate areas. No materials may be deposited or stockpiled on the public streets, boulevards or sidewalks. At the end of each working day, the Contractor shall remove any soil that washed or was deposited on any public sidewalk or street and shall remove any trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any public property. No dumpsters, portable toilets, building materials, or equipment may be stored on a public street sidewalk, or boulevard area. 8. Tracking of dirt onto public roads during hauling and general day -to -day construction operations will require periodic cleaning of these roadways. Scraping and vacuum assisted sweeping or a combination may be required. Power brooms or "sidewinder" type devices are not acceptable for cleaning of the roadway. 9. Any sediment tracked onto City streets or sidewalks; or onto streets that drain into storm sewer systems shall be kept clean by the Contractor; sediment shall be removed within 12 hours of discovery. If the Contractor fails to remove all of the tracked sediment from streets the City shall remove any sediment at the Contractor's expense. 10. The site will have proper erosion and sediment control and will be adequately maintained on a continual basis to contain on -site erosion and protect on and off -site vegetation, as shown on City approved erosion control plans. Contractor must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices prior to soil disturbing activities that may result in sediment laden storm water runoff entering the inlet. The Contractor shall provide effective storm drain inlet protection over the life of the Project until all surfaces with potential for discharging sediment to an inlet have been stabilized. The Contractor is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. For example, devices must be regularly cleaned out and emergency overflow must be an integral part of the device to reduce the flooding potential; and devices must be placed such that driving hazards or obstructions are not created. 2 I I . The Contractor shall clean, remove sediment, or replace storm drain inlet protection devices on a routine basis such that the devices are fully functional for the next rainstorm event. Removal and disposal of trapped sediment in inlet protection devices shall be incidental to the Project. Sediment deposited in and /or plugging drainage systems is the responsibility of the Contractor and shall be removed at no expense to the Department. 12. The Contractor and all subcontractors will install and maintain a rock entrance pad or its equivalent, or similar surfaces, at each location where vehicles enter or exit from the construction site, as shown on the approved plan. 13. All debris will be contained on the project site. A regularly scheduled trash removal service shall be hired to remove this debris. 14. Building materials will be delivered to the site within the working hours listed in #2 above, on an as- needed basis, thus keeping large material stockpiles located on the site to a minimum. 15. Dust control is the responsibility of the on -site Contractor. The Contractor shall be required to respond to any verbal notice from the City regarding dust control and respond appropriately within one (1) hour from the time of notification. 16. No building material, port -o -potty, or dumpster may be placed within street right -of -way. Public sidewalks must be left open and unobstructed. 17. When practical, protective fencing shall installed around all boulevard trees and or trees along lot lines that are intended to be saved. 3 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM AUGUST 16, 2012 6 00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The agenda was amended by member Janovy to move the BETF to after /Community Comment to accommodate Sgt. Olson who was in attendance for the Sidewalk Ordinance Discussion. We= was made by member LaForce and f . APPROVAL OF MINUTES ` REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 19, 2012 Member Whited amended the minutes to add the following to the Streetcar Presentation to the 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence, 'one stop parking option stands to help emphdsize,Southdale as a go to place; and this mode of operation is more friendly travel for seniors.' Motion was made by member LaForcej and seconded by member Janovy to approve the amended July 19 minutes. All voted ave. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT Gretchen Cooper and Bill, 58th & Chowen, said their concern has gotten progressive over the last 7 years with the number of cars that are speeding between 57th & 58`" and the increase in cut thru traffic during the school year. She said one month ago she yelled at a driver going'about 40 -45 mph and the driver turned around, came back and yelled explicits at her and said she was speeding because she was coming down,the hill. Ms. Cooper said something needs to be done. She said she is aware that speed bumps are a problem for snow plows and she knows the police are monitoring the area but the problem increases. on the weekends and holidays usually. She said the drivers are both teens and adults. Director Houle, +vas asked if speed data was available and he said he would need to check. He said if the occurrences are at the same time.every day the police can be notified for smart enforcement. A school bus was noted as a culprit that speeds through the same time every day. Mr. Houle said larger vehicles can often appear to be going faster than they really are. Member Whited. said the issue is .'that the area is convenient for cut thru traffic and Mr. Houle said it is scheduled for reconstruction in a couple years and they can look at plans to address the issues. Member Janovy said this area has come up a few times and wondered if a slightly different approach should be taken. She said reviewing speed, volume, history of traffic safety requests -and crashes is probably a good starting point but asking residents to wait a couple years might not be. Suggested solutions were putting out the speed monitor to educate drivers of how fast they are driving and adding it to the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) report in order to track it. Mr. Houle said staff will provide all the data at the next meeting and also add this to the TSC. Member lyer asked if staff tracks calls or issue areas and Mr. Houle said yes, they are tracked on a map. REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS Sidewalk Ordinance Discussion Member Janovy said at the TLC Bike Blvd public hearing, someone asked about bikes, strollers and wheelchairs on sidewalks and it was the first time she realized that bikes were not allowed. She brought the issue to the BETF and her report is from their discussion that recommends changing the ordinance to liberalize biking on sidewalk, allow biking on sidewalks in business districts and also allow parking on sidewalks. In conversation with the City of Minneapolis' bike coordinator, he told her that they allow biking on sidewalks but not in business districts but he knows it happens and they are studying the issue. Peter Kelley, chair of the BETF and member Janovy met recently with Sgt. Olson to discuss the issue. BETF liaison, Sgt. Tim Olson, was in attendance to explain the Police Department's opinion on biking on sidewalks which he said is based on safety. Sgt. Olson said allowing bikes on sidewalk would increase the safety risks at the expense of a small percentage of bikers. He said the City was aware of what they were doing when the ordinance was put together. He said further that the City is making an effort to provide bike lanes on the roads and that state statute has specific rules for biking on roadways. Sgt. Olson said he met with members Janovy and Kelley and they agreed there is a public safety issue by riding on the sidewalk. He said the department is reluctant to support open use of the sidewalk but recognizes exceptions and inconsistencies, e.g., a child learning to ride on the sidewalk and a parent riding with the child are not safety concerns because they would be riding-slow; the upcoming Fre Avenue sidewalk project is not a concern because of the width of the sidewalk – it will not present a risk; andxhaving parking stations on sidewalks. He said the ordinance could be modified to address these exceptions andina�monsistences. Additionally, the ordinance references a bike registration law that was repealed by the state inL;2005, soXtKik in effect adhering to an outdated law. Discussionrr \ Member Whited asked about bike collisions with seniors 56JA —c .Olson said to date;. there have not been any collisions - .� , on sidewalks. He said they do not actively enforce the sidewalk;ordinance and in fact, most•ordinances are enforced based on complaints but at least the ordinance is in place when enforcement;is necessary :> \ th used ° Member lyer asked if the ordinance should be'for high traffic are J %as;lrf ike 66 & Valley View versus a residential %ZI -X -r. street. Sgt. Olson said the biking population is so,small;'R does not warrant•changing the ordinance. He said the focus should instead be on what is convenient for pedest ans, not for bikers. Member Bass _said there are adult9',%N "sdo:not like being' the street`s';and shefsees both children and adults on .. MR, sidewalks every day. She said sbme•riders are;comfortable in tih treets,while others are not. She said also that people .`f %' 'fry ff do moderate their behavior accordingly and there have not been any crashes; however, they should allow for people who are making a safe choice base `ion comfort %level and ability to do so legally. Sgt. Olson said she supports the Police .. ���f%!f� rte,_ Department's posits that,it is a good,brd nancearegardless ofwwhether it is legal to do so. He said the ordinance is effective because there haveno, t��been ariyfcidents antl {ffwingfor change has the potential for problems. He said the current system works well and there is no need:to increaseAh'd risks to pedestrians based on a small population of bikers F,. who already haveL,,�place to ride. Member La Force said Yfhe�ordinance is a g od policyfl ut he also thinks it is a problem when they have ordinances that do not reflect the practices of'what is goingo'n. He said most people are probably not aware that it is illegal to ride on sidewalks and, he,wondered what �behavioange they would see if they, were to tell people. Sgt. Olson said he believes most people would prefer to not have more bikers on the sidewalk. Member lyer said it does increase the risks if they add bikers to sidewalks. Sgt. Olson askat is the need to put bikes on sidewalk when there is an adjacent roadway. He said the City is making strides to accommodate bikers with bike lanes like they have on 70th. He said integration of the different modes of transportation will create problems. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Iver to table the current discussion and allow them to think over what was learned for discussion at a later date. All voted ave. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Committee (TSQ Report of August 1.2012 Section A.I. Member Janovy did a revision of the speed table policy for discussion. She did not include a speed threshold because 27 mph, in context, could be considered unsafe so why wait for 30 -35 mph to do something. Member Thompson ask to remove item #6 and allow for engineering judgment and member Janovy said she would prefer not to. Members lyer and Nelson agreed that item #6 should be removed. Member Franzen said the revision is concise and well written and agreed with deleting #6. Member Janovy agreed. Motion was made by member Iyer and seconded by member Franzen to adopt member Janovy's revised speed table policy without item #6 and without the notation section. All voted ave. Motion carried. Section A.2 Member Janovy said the revision is nicely improved. She asked about item #4 because she came home recently and found a contractor had closed Morningside Road. She said they had pulled a street bond but not a road closed permit. She asked if it should specify pulling both and also notifying residents because a resident coming home for lunch would not have had access. Mr. Houle said a road closed permit would require the contractor to post a detour but in this case he did not pull one. Regarding item #5, member Janovy asked if it would be helpful to reference the parking requirement either here or in item #6. Member Janovy will forward her comments to Mr. Houle for inclusion. Section A.3 Member Janovy said the statement "The City of Edina policy regarding parking restrictions requires present conditions that impacts traffic safety in order to restrict parking" is not reflected in the current Parking Policy as the only factor. She said there are other reasons to restrict parking and noted the sentence as inaccurate or misleading. Section B.2 Member Janovy circulated a memo explaining the background of this intersection. She said this is a long standing issue from the 2005 NE Study. She said a raised intersection with marked crosswalk was originally planned but all raised intersections were taken out by the City Council.-She said crossing at Grimes is difficult because of visibility and there is frustration after having stopped at six stops signs previously. She said the intersection serves as crossing for the Country Club, 50th & France, and 44th and France. Member Bass said another stop sign is adding a problem further down the road and suggested a traffic circle, not to stop cars but slow them down. Member Janovy said a`traffic circle was recommended in a Resident Area Safety Improvement plan but since that time the curb line was reconstructed. Mr: Houle said the intersection was realigned to fix a surface water issue but that it could be realigned to fit a traffic-circle and crosswalks could be included. He said he would prefer to do a study so that he could include to the east where speeding is occurring. Member Thompson agreed and suggested a corridor study instead of spot review. Mr. Houle, suggested deferring this to a later date to lay out a plan for a corridor study. This was moved to section C. 2012 Bikeways PCOiect Mr. Houle said City Council requested that Alliant Engineering look at the plans and Mike Anderson's memo and mark- ups were distributed. He said the BETF also'reviewed,the plans and their memo and mark -ups for 70th & Antrim were also distributed and he recommended accepting their suggestion. Member Janovy said she compared the original plans to the mark ups and will giveNt.. Houle her findings. Additionally, Mr. Houle sought support for using a resolution or an ordinance to designate bike lanes. The consensus was to use an ordinance and to revise the draft ordinance to end at '...Section 169.222.' in section 1420.04. Mr. Houle said the plans will go back to City Council on Sept 4 and the Public Works Department will begin shortly thereafter. Motion made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass to support the bike and striping plans with clarification of questions raised and ordinance with deletion of everything after 169.222 in section 1420.04. All voted ave. Motion carried. Updates Student Member Mr. Houle said a new student member was appointed and she will begin next month. Bike Edina Task Force — Minutes of July 12, 2012 Member Janovy said the BETF voted to become a working group of the ETC because it is currently not part of the City structure and this was made very clear by CM Neal when chair Kelley sought reimbursements for expenditures related to the BETF website and he was told the BETF was similar to the Hockey Association and reimbursement was not approved. She said they discussed whether or not they would be able to continue to function as it has, if it becomes a working group. She said they have their own website and gets in kind donation and would they be able to continue this way. She said the BETF was set up for a specific task and the task was completed but they've continued to operate as though they were part of the City structure. Discussion to.be continued. Living Streets Working Group Member Thompson said he asked for comments on the overview that the consultant gave at the last meeting and those comments were received and forwarded to the consultant. He said t handout is a revision that includes the comments. Member Thompson said the next step is to meet with staff,rrother commissions, other stakeholders and public outreach. Member Laforce asked if people have heard about this people who are interacting with Do.Town have been tc certain that there is a candidate running for City Council t end have ffffiVided any feedback. Member Bass said Complete Streets. Member La Force said he is fairly inst it.r. Moving forward, phase 1 is done said member Thompson and phase 2 is unfunded. He said,;St.. j. Paul spent approximately •fF $150,000 developing their plan. Member Janovy.-asked if franchise•fees.coulfd be used for polio development. Mr. Houle said he included $200,000 in his budget for tlkisrtype; of work, plus a. transportation engineer and he could reword it. Member Bass suggested putting together a progress report for the original funders and see if they have additional funds for phase II. Member Janovy said she had asked his of °Robin, and she said did not have any more funds. Mr. Houle recommended having a consultant and transportation, staff b6th" working "on this so he will redo his budget. Member Bass said Do.Town staff is availablAtuntil March 2013. ,f Transportation Options WorkingyGrou 2 Member Whited said they reviewed VEAP's program to see' 6` it can serve Edina's needs. Her agency, PRISM, and VEAP will be agencies .that Hennepin County will rely�on to ser ,e;communities when they break up their downtown service center. Nextsmonth rBecky McBride, project manager fr- he Met Council will be in attendance to talk about the BE Line so the-group can see{if it-tan BE If' Edina and.the timing is perfect as they are looking at revamping this line. {rar The working group; minutes will be included irr•thekETC packet from now on. CORRESPONDENCE AND1,P•ETITIONS — None-. 1., `r. to Member Janovy asked if this1s when they:would talk about 58 & Halifax and member Whited said she wondered the same about her neighborhotid�and if it should be discussed under Living Streets. Mr. Houle said the correspondence was rr a aril! sent to Council and staff and it'is,?;lnot cleat twhim what "should be brought forward to the ETC. He said it is difficult when staff is being pulled in so many direct oris�when they are already doing so much and residents do not believe that staff is doing anything to help. He said it is difficult when there are no funding, limited state aid funds or requests not meeting state aid requirements. Member Thompson said part of it is education and recognizing that they cannot help everyone. Member Bass said the goal is to generate support now for when street projects come around. Member Janovy said it is also getting people involved with programs like as Operation Lead Foot. They talked about inexpensive ways to deal with speeding such as equipping residents with radar guns, flagging speed limit signs to draw attention and getting residents involved at the neighborhood level. Chair Nelson asked if these emails are forwarded to the traffic safety coordinator and Mr. Houle said this was the first of `ts kind so they need to develop a process because they will be receiving more. Member Bass said engineering is the best pproach since not everyone will become involved but it looks like the City Council is responding residents and this is helpful. 4 CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS 2013 Work Plan Chair Nelson said CM Neal wants this by September. Suggested items were Sidewalk Plan; Way Finding for sidewalks /pedestrians and standard for signage; France Ave Crosswalks; Safe Routes to School; Review Transportation & CIP; Pedestrian Plan; same items as last year's plan excluding the TLC Bike Blvd; and communication /education. Chair Nelson will update the 2013 Work Plan and email to everyone. Chair Nelson said he spoke with Floyd Gabriel, chair of the Planning Commission (PC) about scheduling a meeting between the two commissions to talk about planning and transportation and the meeting is scheduled for September 27, 6 -7 p.m. (one hour before the PC's regular schedule meeting). He said it is not a mandatory meeting for the ETC and the agenda is still to be defined. Chair Nelson said Hennepin County is drafting a Pedestrian Plan and Rose Ryan is willing to attend the next meeting to talk about it. He said they are having community meetings but nothing is planned for Edina - the closest meeting is in the Crystal /New Hope area. Member Janovy said Councilmember Brindle mentioned contraflow bike lanes on Normandale between 66tH & 70tH. She said the shoulder has been mistaken for bike lane and asked_ if it could be striped for bikela,ne. She asked what the process is when a councilmember brings up something that is related to transportation duHng.,� council meeting. Mr. Houle said they generally follow up with the councilmember and staff is currently working on a feasibility study for bike lanes and sidewalk on Normandale between 66th and 70tH Member Janovy said at TAB they still do not know how much•federal money they will be getting. She said the Met Council has a new website, Thrive Msp.com, and wants people to weigh in on What's needed to thrive in 2040 — housing, jobs, transportation, etc. �f Member Whited said a new neighbor parks his tar with a cover for days at a�fime and wondered if this was legal. Mr. Houle suggested contacting Sgt. Olson.. Member lyer said his neighbor asked him about the "new' special,assessment interest rates. Mr. Houle said he will cover this in his staff; report. Member Franzen said he attended the`2613 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting and it was one of the best ran public meetings he's ever attended and in speaking with neighbors they also felt the same way. He said it was very decisive •and residents knew what was or was not allowed and there was no room for them to go off on tangents about things such as the special assessment. Chair Nelson said there appear to be sfreet,projects going on that the ETC did not know about, i.e. the frontage road near City Hall. Mr. Houle said Public Works is doing a mill and overlay project. Member Janovy said this type of work provides opportunity for restriping. Mr. Houle said he will speak with Brian Olson, Public Works Director to learn their schedule. STAFF COMMENTS France Avenue Update — Mr. Houle said option 3 was approved by City Council for a $4M budget; staff is working with property owners to acquire ROW at no cost; the monuments were taken out; existing sidewalk at Whole Foods will stay; starting detail plans immediately; finalizing memo to the state within the next week; and will reach out to Hennepin County for funding gap. It is unknown at this time if the newly acquired ROW would become the City's or Hennepin County's. TLC Bike Boulevard Update — this project will begin next week - Wooddale to be seal coated by Public Works; and a counter /video monitor was mounted today at 60th & Wooddale to take bike and pedestrian counts as part of the project. Status 2012 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects — Richmond Hills, Countryside, and Tracy Ave projects will be going through September /October; others will be completed by Labor Day. Status 2013 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects —informational meeting held for 4 of 5 neighborhoods; Normandale is scheduled for September 5 (being consulted to SEH); staff incorporated recommendations from the communications audit that was done (executive summary will be shared with the ETC); draft feasibility studies will be ready for the next meeting; checking to see if staff'can have a special public hearing meeting with City Council to approve all the projects at once. ; f On August 6, City Council approved first reading of a franchise fee per,/,' fund sidewalks trails and street lights so no longer assessed. The special assessment policy was revised to inelutle payback from 10 to 15 years and interest rate r'rf�!lrf rff /,,fry from 2 to .1 percent above the bond interest rate. At the next City Council meeting ,they will reconsider including the `Grf 2011 project areas into the policy change. th Member Janovy asked for an update on W. 44 at the next-ineeting. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjou ATTACHMENT Attendance Sp 01 VU \� O. i REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF Cn ,0 $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. G. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Request for Purchase 2011/2012 Watermain and Service Roadway Repairs Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: August 17; 2012 October 17, 2012 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Bituminous Roadways, Inc $ 25,275.00 2. Minnesota Roadways Comp. $ 26,998.00 3. Midwest Asphalt Corp. $ 39,980.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bituminous Roadways, Inc $ 25,275.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for roadway repairs related to watermain and water service breaks that occurred in 2011/2012. This project will be funded from the Utility fund. Staff recommends awarding this bid to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Engineering Signature artment The Recommended Bid is �� ^ within budget not within bud a Jo n Wallin, Finance irector tt H. fibal, Ci M ager G:\PW\1NFRAS \UTILITIES DIV\WATER \Water Main Breaks Road Repair \Item W.G. Request for Purchase 2011 -2012 Watermain.docx 0 Y10 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV. H. From: Scott Neal City Manager Action Discussion Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Request To Waive Building Permit Fee For Hornets Nest Project. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the request to waive the building permit fee for the Hornets Nest Project INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City typically assesses and pays building permit fee for municipal building projects. I am recommending the City Council grant a request to waive the building permit fee for the Hornets Nest project. The building permit fee for the project is $36,000. The City's building permit revenue for 2012 will be at near record level, so the fee is not necessary to meet the permit revenue projection for this year. Waiving the fee allows the City to set aside more money for potential future change orders, add more value to the project, and makes the project more affordable by reducing the overall project cost. y 11O Y' N PROCLAMATION CONSTITUTION WEEK WHEREAS, it is the privilege of all Americans to commemorate the two hundred twenty - first anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuance of a proclamation by the President of the United States of America, designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. 110 THEREFORE, I James B. Hovland, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Edina do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK and urge all citizens to study the Constitution and reflect on the privilege of being an American with all the rights and responsibilities which that privilege involves. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set by hand and caused the Seal of the City of Edina to be affixed this 4th day of September in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve. James B. Hovland, Mayor /1 ^1 oe \� 8B i REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VI.A. From: Cary Teague, Community F-1 Action Development Director ® El Discussion Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Site Plan, Bruce Carlson, 7501 France Avenue, Build a Free - standing Coffee Shop with a Drive -thru, Resolution No. 2012 -108 Deadline November 20, 2012 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Continue the public hearing to September 19, 2012 INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a continuation of the public hearing to September 19, 2012. They would like time to finalize their plans based on recommendations made by the Planning Commission in regard to drive -thru lanes. �91NAr o e I' 898 i REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item NO.VI.B From: Cary Teague, Community ® Action Development Director Discussion Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Conditional Use Permit, Paul and Kristen Commers, 4710 Golf Terrace, Allow First Floor Elevation of More than One -Foot Above the Existing First Floor Elevation, Resolution No. 2012 -109 ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is asked to approve the attached Resolution No. 2012 -109. Planninq Commission recommendation: On August 22, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended denial of a Conditional Use Permit to build a new home at 4710 Golf Terrace based on the applicant's failure to justify conditions #2 and #4 of Section 850.11. Subd.3. of the Zoning Ordinance. Vote: 4 Ayes and 2 Nays. The recommendation is due to the applicant submitting. incomplete information regarding setting a minimum basement elevation based on ground water intrusion, and on the need for the applicant to demonstrate the impact of the proposed first floor height in relation to neighboring properties. The applicant has since submitted a supplemental engineering report which sets a recommended basement elevation of 895, based on existing water table conditions (which the applicant is proposing) and an elevation rendering of the front of the proposed home in context with adjacent homes to establish the scale of the project relative to the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for a new home at 4710 Golf Terrace. The Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation of 905.8 feet which is 3.2 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing home, and 2.2 feet above first floor height allowed by ordinance. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: A Conditional Use Permit is requested by owners Paul and Kristin Commers to allow the first floor elevation of their new home to be 3.2 feet higher than the existing first floor of the home to be replaced, (2.2 feet higher than allowed by ordinance), due to ground water issues, at 4710 Golf Terrace. The first floor of the existing /previous home was at 902.6 feet. The new first floor is proposed to be at 905.8 feet. The maximum allowed increase without a Conditional Use Permit is 903.6 feet. Because of ground water issues, the basement of the new home must be elevated to a minimum recommended height of 895 feet. The new first floor height will be at 905.8, with the basement providing 9 -foot ceiling heights. A basement with a 9 -foot ceiling is considered reasonable within the City. The inability to go down lower to accomplish a 9 -foot ceiling height in the basement, the desire to raise the low floor elevation and an upgrade of building materials from previous building practice will result in the new home being 3.2 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing home and 2.2 feet above the allowable limit per ordinance. The proposed new home is two- stories with an attached three car garage. There are a mixture of housing styles and periods of construction throughout the neighborhood. There are ramblers to full two story homes nearby. The applicant's builder has indicated that home has been designed with mass and scale to minimize any impact the new home may have on the adjacent homes. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2012 -109 Cover letter from the applicant's builder Supplemental Engineer's report from Geo Engineering Consultants Inc Elevation rendering of the proposed home and adjacent homes Minutes of the August, 22, 2012, Planning Commission Meeting. Staff report Survey and building plans for the new home Preliminary engineering report A, 4�91��'1r1. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-109 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 4710 GOLF TERRACE FOR PAUL AND KRISTEN COMMERS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to tear down and construct a new. home at 4710 Golf Terrace. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. Specifically the applicant would like to raise the first floor elevation 3.2 feet above the existing first floor elevation. 1.02 The. property is legally described' as follows: Lot 1, Block 2, Golf Terrace Heights, Hennepin County, Minn. 1.03 On August 22, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the conditional use permit. Vote: 4. Ayes and 2 Nays. Denial was based on the applicant's failure to meet conditions #2 and #4 of Section 850.11. Subd. 3 of the Zoning Ordinance. 1.04 On August 27, 2012, the applicant submitted a Geotechnical report for Geo Engineering Consultants Inc. that recommends a low floor elevation of 895 to minimize the potential for a wet basement; consistent with the applicant's proposal. 1.05 On August 27, 2012, the applicant submitted an elevation rendering of the proposed home and the adjacent homes demonstrating the proposed home is not out of scale or character in the neighborhood. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance Section 850.11. Subd. 3. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The homes in the area have a variety of height, mass and scale. 4. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov e 952- 927 -8861 e Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-109 Page Two Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a new home at 4710 Golf Terrace, subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Plans and elevations date stamped July 25 and August 27, 2012. • Survey date stamped July 25, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on September 4, 2012. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2012. City Clerk MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 22, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. Chair Grabiel called the meetlnLy to order at 7:00 PM II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Cotmissi Absent from the roll: Fischer III. Meeting Agenda was apprgfed as IV. A V. C( None VI. P C. Conditional Use Permit, Paul and Kristen Commers, 4710 Golf Terrace, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the property owners Paul and Kristin Commers are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home at 4710 Golf Terrace. The Conditional Use Permit is being requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the previous home by more than one foot. Specifically the applicant would like to raise the first floor elevation 3.2 feet above the first floor elevation of the previous home that had occupied the site. The first floor of the previous home was at 902.6 feet. The new first floor is proposed to be at 905.8 feet. The maximum allowed increase without a Conditional Use Permit is 903.6 feet, The new first floor is proposed to be 2.2 feet over the one foot allowed by city code in order to reasonably protect the lower level of the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The attached Page 1 of 12 K Report of Geotechnical Exploration dated July 24, 2012, from Geo Engineering Consultants, Inc., regarding ground water levels indicates ground water at a level of 897.7 feet with a recommended lowest floor elevation of at least 894.0 to 895.0 feet, Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for a new home at 4710 Golf Terrace. The Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation of 905.8 feet which is 3.2 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing home and 2.2 feet above first floor height allowed by ordinance based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. and subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped July 25, 2012 • Building plans and elevations date stamped July 25, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. Appearing for the Applicant Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, and Paul Commers, property owner. Discussion /Comments Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Aaker for clarification on what the actual building height of the proposed house would be when completed if the Conditional Use Permit were approved. Aaker explained that the plans indicate that the building height is 31 -feet; however, one has to take into account what that final height would be after the elevation is raised. Aaker said the final height would probably be 33 -34 plus feet range. Applicant Presentation Scott Busyn introduced Mr. Commers property owner. Scott Busyn addressed the Commission and told them a neighborhood meeting was held Page 2of12 with the neighbors indicating their support for the project. Busyn pointed out the Commers worked carefully on the design of their house paying close attention to details. Busyn reported that the proposed house will be attractive on all sides; not only the front fagade and also preserves the neighbors view of the golf course. Concluding, Busyn said every effort was made to minimize the height of the proposed house, adding the height of the house is highest in the center and levels out. Commissioner Platteter questioned why the elevation at 895 was chosen and not 894. Mr. Busyn responded that as a builder there is a liability concern so one wants to make sure the home is out of the water table as much as possible. Continuing, Busyn pointed out FHA requires the lowest floor elevation to be 4 -feet above the water table.. Busyn reported in the present home the sump pump runs continually, pointing out a pond is directly behind the subject property and of course, Lake Harvey is across the street. Water is an issue on this lot. Busyn also noted that when doing the soil testing it was found that the lot is peat and new construction will require pilings. Commissioner Platteter said he has a concern with drainage; especially to the west. Mr. Busyn responded that the drainage in the rear will drain to the existing pond to the south and the west water run -off will be directed into a swale. Busyn pointed out the size of the lot is adequate, adding it is hoped that the majority of the water run off would percolate on the lot depositing additional run -off into the swale. Concluding, Busyn said typically drainage issues are handled'through the building permit review process and if any issues are brought up they are resolved during this process prior to the issuance of a building permit. The discussion ensued on the proposed basement ceiling height at 9 -feet and how that relates to the water table and the higher first floor elevation. Commissioners asked Mr. Busyn to clarify the reasoning behind the proposed 9 -foot basement ceiling height. Mr. Busyn responded that previously he lived in a home with a ceiling height of 7 -feet, adding in the current market that ceiling height is too low, pointing out some people can actually touch the ceiling with their hands at that height. Continuing, Busyn said 9 -feet is now the standard basement ceiling height for a house of this price and size. Busyn said Ordinance allows exceptions for a new home rebuilt after a tear down of more than one -foot above the first floor elevation of the home that was torn down through a Conditional Use Permit if certain conditions are met. Busyn added he doesn't believe he or anyone else should be the "style police" telling a property owner the type, style, or ceiling height of house they want to build. Concluding, Busyn said the bottom line is that this is an issue of water; if we could go deeper we would. Commissioner Forrest commented that Building Code has a minimum basement ceiling height of 7 -feet; not 9 -feet, adding as previously mentioned the requested 9 -foot ceiling could be the issue. Page 3 of 12 R Commissioner Staunton noted if there wasn't a water table issue present this request wouldn't be before us. Commissioners agreed with that statement. Continuing, Staunton said at this time the property owner is requesting relief from the City's Ordinance through the Conditional Use Permit process. Staunton pointed out the Ordinance regarding limiting the first floor building elevation is fairly new; however, the Commission is starting to see more requests of this nature. Concluding, Staunton said he believes the request is reasonable and not different from the previously requested and approved Conditional Use Permits. Commissioner Schroeder asked if the Commission feels #2 of Ordinance 850.11 Subd. 2 was met. Commissioner Scherer said in her opinion she's isn't sure if a 9 -foot ceiling is actually necessary or "to the extent necessary' to meet #2. Scherer said she believes the house will fit in; however, as mentioned by Commissioner Schroeder she isn't sure #2 is met (at least with what we have been provided). Scherer concluded that it may be beneficial for the Commission as a group to further discuss condition #2 and better "spell out" what's required and what comes into play. Chair Grabiel noted the engineer retained by Mr. Busyn indicated an elevation of between 894 -895, adding the Commission can use that elevation to make their determination on what is a reasonable first floor building elevation. Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Schroeder commented that he feels uncomfortable accepting the materials provided by Mr. Busyn. He noted the "report" is only a one page e-mail from an engineer. Schroeder said in his opinion this isn't a "report" it's a one -time elevation reading. Schroeder said he feels what the Commission received in their packet to support the Conditional Use Permit is inadequate. Schroder stated he wants more information. Chair Grabiel said he agrees with the comments from Commissioner Schroder, adding what bothers him is the one e-mail written by an engineer and that the Commission is basing their decision on that one e-mail which is minimal at best. Grabiel reiterated he agrees with Schroeder that the "report" provided isn't adequate enough for him to make an educated decision. Commissioner Carpenter wondered if the data received from the engineer via e-mail was consistent with the data received on similar requests to relieve the first floor building height elevation requirement. Carpenter said he would have no problem asking the applicant for a more detailed report; however, he doesn't want this property owner to be held to a higher standard. Commissioner Schroeder said at the very least he would like to see a letter from a certified engineer or hydrologist on letter head; not an e-mail. Schroeder stressed in his opinion the information the Commission received from Busyn doesn't have the level of detail the City requires. Concluding, Schroeder said if one reads Condition 2 of the Ordinance it specifies what's required; it's clear, adding what was received isn't it. Page 4 of 12 The discussion ensued on the inadequacy of the materials provided by Mr. Busyn. It was suggested that the applicant return to the Commission with a more complete engineering report. A brief discussion ensued between Commissioners and Mr. Busyn with the Commission acknowledging their action is a recommendation to the City Council and they agreed to act on the request immediately and move it forward to the City Council for their review and action. Motion Commissioner Schroeder moved to deny the Conditional Use Permit based on the applicant's failure to justify #2 and #4 of the required ordinance conditions found in 850.11 Subd. 3. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Forrest, Platteter, Grabiel. Nays; Staunton, Carpenter. Motion to deny carried. D. Site P14n - Bruce Carlson, 7501 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Prese ation Planner Teague infor d the Commission Bruce Carlson, on be alf of Zthe Centennial Lakes Plaza is requesting a Site san review to build a 1,750 squar oot Starbucks Coffee shop with adrive- through wind within the parking lot of C tennial Lakes Plaza at 7501 France Avenue. Outdoor dinin tiles are proposed o e west side of the building. The proposed Starbucks would expert ce its most acti during the morning hours, when the shopping center is not at its busiest e. Concluding, Teague said staff recommend at the City Council approve the Site Plan for Starbucks located at 7501 France. venu a d on the following findings: 1. The proposal would m/threquired sta ards and ordinances for a Site Plan. 2. WSB conducted a traffiudy, and co cluded that the existing roadway system could support t d project. Approval of the Site Plan Kalso subject to the following c 1. Subject to st approval, the site must be developed andVaintained in substantial conforma e with the following plans, unless modified by a conditions below: • Site plan date stamped July 25, 2012. • Grading plan date stamped July 25, 2012. • Landscaping plan date stamped July 25, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped July 25, 2012 Page 5 of 12 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD, GREAT LOCATIONS I GREAT DESIGN I GREAT QUALITY To: Kris Aaker - City Of Edina From: Scott Busyn - Great Neighborhood Homes Date: August 28, 2012 Subject: Supplement to CUP Application for 4710 Golf Terrace Dear Kris, Please find attached supplemental materials for our CUP application for 4710 Golf Terrace: 1. Final Soil Boring Report showing recommended low floor elevation of 895 for new home at 4710 Golf Terrace to protect the dwelling from ground water intrusion. 2. Streetscape to scale showing new home at 4710 Golf Terrace between existing homes (4800 and 4708). This is being presented as support that the new home at 4710 Golf Terrace will fit into the neighborhood in height, mass and scale. Key things to note: a. New home fills in roofline flow of two homes by being at the approximate average height of the two adjacent homes. New home is well below allowable 40' ridge height for homes on lots greater than 75' b. New home is narrower than home to west (4800) and close to the width of home to east (4708) c. New home is positioned on site to be roughly equal distance between 4800 and 4708 (44.13' and 47.2', respectively). d. Design and materials of new home (stone and cedar shingles) allows for good architectural blending between the all brick colonial (4708) to the east and the brick and wood siding colonial cottage style the west. 3. Additional photographs to show existing site and its adjacency to the pond in the rear and Lake Harvey across Golf Terrace. 4. In addition, I reviewed all Edina building permits issued in 2012 for new single family homes over $500,000 in valuation. Of these 16 homes, 14 homes have 9' basements. Thanks again for all the time and effort in reviewing our CUP for 4710 Golf ;P`�e. Please let me know if I can provide additional information or answer a K� ti SCOTT BUSYN mAlreARET WS?N PHONE 952 - 807 -8765 1 SCOTT. BUSYN @COMCAST.NET PHONE 952 - 807 -8766 1 MBVN @C AST.NET - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - -- - --- - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - . -.... - -- ..... -_ _ .. - - -- - - -- ... - - - - T 4615 WOODDALE AVENUE, EDINA, MINNESOTA 554241 FAX 952 - 926 -1168 f' MN BUILDERS LICENSE # BC- 521688 GeO Engineering Consultants Inc PO Box 21490 Minneapolis MN 55421 Phone 763.502.9945 Fax 763.502.9946 August 9, 2012 Mr. Scott Busyn Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. 4615 Wooddale Avenue Edina, MN 55424 RE: Geotechnical Exploration Program Proposed House 4710 Golf Terrace Edina, Minnesota Project Number: 012 - 0012 -5424 This report presents the results of the geotechnical exploration program performed for the Proposed House at 4710 Golf Terrace in Edina, Minnesota. In accordance with your authorization on April 26, 2012 and July 12, 2012, we have conducted a geotechnical exploration and subsurface water monitoring program for the planned construction. Our work scope under these authorizations was limited to performing three dynamic penetration test borings, install one piezometer and monitor water levels for two weeks, and providing an engineering report that includes logs of the borings, a sketch indicating the locations, and our engineering recommendations for foundation support. The purpose of this report is to present the results of our field exploration and the associated engineering review. The field work was performed on April 28, 2012 and July 14, 2012. The borings and piezometer were put down at the locations shown on the attached sketch. The surface elevations at the boring locations were interpolated from lot survey and are only approximate. The surface elevations at boring locations should be verified by the surveyor. Soil classification was performed in general accordance with American Standards for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D2488. The subsurface conditions suggest a soil profile consisting of existing fill underlain by swamp deposits, fine alluvium and coarse alluvium. In general, 3 to 6 feet of fill were found at the surface. The fill is underlain by very soft organic lean clays and silts, peat, and fat clays up to depth of 17 feet near the northeast corner of the existing house. In addition very soft silty clays and loose clayey sands were noticed below the fill near the southwest c e xisting house., A js�y �u1 Project Number: 012 - 0012 -5424 Page 2 ' The coarse alluvium consists of sands and silty sands in medium dense to dense conditions noticed at borings B -1 and B -3 to the depth of exploration Water level measurements were made in the boreholes during and at the completion of the borings. Based on this data, initially no water was noticed at the time of our field work. A piezometer was installed at boring B -3 on July 14, 2012 to measure the water level over time., Based on two water level measurements in the piezometer on July 20 and July 29, 2012, water level was measured at 5.7 and 5.4 feet below the present grade, respectively. In general, water may fluctuate throughout the year depending on several factors. We understand the existing house will be demolished and a new house will be constructed. The new house will be a two -story with full basement. The structure will be of wood frame construction supported on load bearing walls and possible interior columns. Currently, we have no information on actual foundation loadings. However, we anticipate the maximum column loads may be on the order of 75 kips and perimeter wall load will not exceed 3 kips per lineal foot. The existing fill, peat and very soft fat clay should not be relied upon for new foundation support because of their limited strength and compressibility potential. To remove and replace these soils will require 14 to 17 feet of excavation at the boring locations. Conventional excavation and refill procedure are not desirable due to shallow water level, excavation oversize requirements and proximity to nearby structures. In our opinion a deep foundation system of helical compression anchors is suitable for supporting the proposed house. Other deep foundations may be used, such as driven piles. However, because of relatively smaller size project, near the existing structures and potential vibrations from driven pile installation, in our opinion, a deep foundation system of helical compression anchors may be more applicable and is recommended at this site. Helical compression anchors have the advantage of minimal site surface disturbance. In addition, there is little or no potential negative (downdrag) load on the anchors from the compressible soils. We recommend the foundation system consist of helical compression anchors. A helical configuration consisting of three helixes of 10,12 and 14 inches in diameter may be used. The capacity for this anchor configuration should be 20 kips per anchor. Other configurations will yield different capacity. The capacity includes a safety factor of 2.0 against soil bearing failure. The maximum final torque of each anchor should be documented to verify the capacity. In addition, a quick load test may be performed on one or more anchors to determine the actual anchor capacity attained. The floor slab should be supported structurally to bear on the helical foundation system. To achieve the capacity, we anticipate the helixes to bear within the dense sand below 35 at the explored locations. We estimate the anchor lengths to be on the order of 35 to 40 feet Cs@O Engineering Consultants Inc Project No. 012- 0012 -5424 Page 3 below the existing grades. An experienced contractor should be consulted for-specific details and installation. All perimeter foundations in heated building space should be placed at a minimum depth of 42 inches below exterior grades for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed at any convenient depth below.the floor slab. In unheated areas where deeper frost penetration may occur, we recommend that the foundations have a minimum soil cover of 60 inches for frost protection. We recommend that a minimum 4 e-inch thick, free - draining granular layer be placed under the floor slabs. This layer should consist of, uniformly- graded sand or gravel with less than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve. In addition to facilitating fine grading for easier slab construction, the granular layer provides a capillary break to minimiie moisture transmission from the subgrade to the floor slab: Backfill placed-behind foundation walls in the lower level area will exert lateral loads against these walls. The lateral loads could.be minimized if free - draining granular soil is used as backfill immediately against the walls. The granular soil should contain no more than 10 percent material passing the #200 sieve, and preferably no more than 40 percent material passing the #40 sieve. The backfill soil should be compacted in layers to at least 95 percent of the Standard Proctor maximum dry density. Use of free - draining granular backfill, the foundation walls should be designed for an at -rest earth pressure coefficient of 0.4 or an equivalent fluid pressure of 50 pounds per cubic foot (pcf); considering the backfill has a unit weight of 125 pcf. In addition to soil pressure, water behind the walls may exert additional pressures. However, the use of relatively permeable soils as recommended above will minimize the risk of water accumulating behind the below grade walls. An exterior draintile system may also be installed for additional protection. The draintile system should be installed below the level of the lowest footing on the outside of the foundation -wall, and should be surrounded by at least 6" of washed, coarse aggregate material which is enveloped in a geotextile fabric. The draintile should be connected to.a suitable outfall or sump where water can be discharged from the system. We are including a typical exterior draintile system sketch. Based on our recent water level reading we recommend the lowest floor.should not be lower than elevation 895 feet to minimize the potential for wet basement conditions. All excavations should comply with the requirements of O.S.H.A. 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations and Trenches ". This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Reference to these O.S.H.A. requirements should be included in the project specifications. GeO Engineering Consultants Inc Project Number: 012 - 0012 -5424 Page 4 Professional judgments and recommendations are presented in this report. They are based partly on evaluation of the technical information gathered, partly on historical reports and partly on our general experience with subsurface conditions in the area. We do not guarantee the performance of the project in any respect other than that our engineering work and the judgment rendered meet the standards and care of our profession. It should be noted that the borings represent the conditions at the time and location of the borings only. No representation is made of conditions at other times and locations. The recommendations presented in this report are applicable only to this specific project. These data should not be used for other purposes. If there are any questions regarding the data or recommendations, please call us at (763) 502- 9945. Geo Engineering Consultants, Inc. cu� "T� S& at.. Ahsanur R. Siddique, P.E. Steven J. Olson, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer Geotechnical Engineer 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. �cw—. KF"J— Date 8/9/2012 Registration No. 2209 G @O Engineering Consultants Inc I I i I 1 I VI 1 I I I I I GOLF TERRACE NN 55424 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY FOR: GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES 11911, �WfR- _ 589'44'47 -E PL(.7 v\ �-i56.53 M -FAQ— —'1 •— r_�._.�. ,_� ow...se nru arer -D.\a- Um.ryrwna Daa o u.roaN o cn wbr nw.. r.b rwwa m + casr. aae / ---( mwo rrA a 'O°6 .axon r.mRry Da.aWn seal .axo.an r...l rm u.elbn r,R el u.e eu..rmn s _ w SCALE: 1 INCH - 10 FEET .em.orc �eao -- uarvq cnnrwr L7 . n LL 1\ I V 1 L. V 1 1 wa ` wrol.a Fan N a wcrbna R.CS. i5]]Or F C) 1� w:u nmR.axe:i eu.wxa reion.ua n. YAM- SOIL G 0 L F ----TERRACE BORING LOCATION I I I aW I I 4BLES rRxxf vum .AM WI arm . W.". S., n. 141..].6 R xuorvous swerri: /•.oe ..a.e n. Ib�o. - x.•ROZ ss rL r.r.e. - •r.a n T.Id - z.sm sn R xR fR DEWAIM. rlml am a I<I 1, eba. i Mm xnl m , on .,,.c,q m rlaal a ram 1, abu ; Imym,w min.m Pan a .aaal.e .I.nL car 1ERR.a rEYrrS. Nx.r.a4. xa..b. Y4nao1R. BO.CIRWti wa el swmr rxwu rmn /ems n c.nlNw •ea0 x.R u.ram. Emwe.n . eae.v. Talc x. s.a,an w. um. 1D1 A" mrm.nb NDTL TM bcNb. d WI u4aW. Nwn an Irom abM luntl.nm q w S7rsm mpaN.. arm an IdLrW.. UUNy .ama+ Wua� uYNa n¢t iWbn Man aaxq aN Ibn, 1 wnh c�..rylr un w. uu..r. odR n�.laarr . w.o>.e qv Ian. Smwrr wN�roux I�n.Me1�iN Sml. el uw... m� � a WxxNR. A 8—.. R.LS. UN RED IS]]D bba 4 GeO Engineering Consultants Inc TEST BORING LOG NO. B -1 Project No. 012 - 0012 -5424 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. SITE 4710 Golf Terrace PROJECT Edina, Minnesota Proposed House Hennepin County SAMPLES TESTS a PID: 19- 028 -24 -22 -0008 T28N- R24W -S19 0 0: �: S' north & 2' west of NE house corner - u w z ADDITIONAL DATA/ a. w m U R w � w o REMARKS Surface Elev.: 898.5 ft. Datum: MSL a. o O in z ? ? 0 00-1 c'1 1.0 FILL - Mixture of organic clay, silty clay, black 897.5 1 26/48 to brown 2 54% FILL - Mostly silty sand with little gravel, moist, fine to medium grained, brown 5 5.0 893.5 5 4 2 24/48 50% ORGANIC SILT (OH), boglime, very soft, light 7.0 gray 891.5 WOH PEAT (PT), fibric, very soft, tan — 3 24/48 �� �' � 10 1 50% 11.0 887.5111%" 87.5 1 2 FAT CLAY (CL), soft, gray 4 48/48 g 100% 15.0 883.5 15 J 9 PEAT (PT), fibric peat with fat clay, soft, gray 17.0 881.5 , �' —'� 9 FAT CLAY CH), firm, gray 12 20 12 11 25 12 28.0 870.5 13 End of boring WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS STARTED 4/28/121 FINISHED 4/28/12 DATE TIME HOLE CASING CAVE -IN WATER NOTE METHOD: Dynamic penetration testing from 0 to DEPTH DEPTH LEVEL 28 feet. Dual tube sampling from 0 to 16 feet. 4/28/12 09:25 28.0 None 4.7 None 4128/12 09:55 16.0 None 4.8 None EAST NORTH DRILL CO. Geo Eng DRILL RIG 54 DT DRILLER SO ASST DRILLER AS GeO Engineering Consultants Inc 15 GeO Engineering Consultants Inc TEST BORING LOG'NO. B -2 Project No. 012- 0012 -5424 .: Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT /ENGINEER Great Neighborhood :Homes, Inc, SITE 4710 Golf Terrace PROJECT Edina, Minnesota Proposed House Hennepin County SAMPLES TESTS 0 PID: 19- 028 -24 -22 -0008 T28N- R24W -S19 °o W F 10 south 8 4 west of SW house corner f Z j ti ADDITIONAL v w o Of Z DATA/ a _ ~a y m � w o REMARKS a g. a o� 2 >_ LL. va Surface Elm: 900.5 ft. Datum: MSL 1,A9 o :. m z F_ .3 o (3 FILL - Mixture of lean clay, sand, dark brown 1 25/48 2.0 898.5 3 52% FILL - 'Mostly sand with little gravel, moist, fine to medium'grained, brown 12 :2 18/48 6.0 894.5 5 13 38 °k SILTY: CLAY (CL -ML) with a little gravel, boglime, very soft, dark brown 9 3 0/48 10.0 890.5 10 1 0% CLAYEY SAND (SC) with a trace of gravel, loose, gray 2 4 38/48 14.0 886.5 5 79% SAND (SP) with a little gravel, fine to medium grained, moist, medium dense, brown 15-::: 26 26 20.0 880.5.-.:-: . : -' 20 21 End of boring WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS STARTED 4/28/121 FINISHED 4/28/12 DATE TIME HOLE CASING CAVE -IN WATER NOTE METHOD: Dynamic penetration testing from 0 to DEPTH DEPTH LEVEL 20 feet. Dual tube sampling from.0.to 16 feet. 4/28/12 11:05 20.0 None 5.0 None 4/28/12 12:05 16.0 None 15.6 None EAST NORTH DRILL CO. Geo Eng DRILL RIG 5 DRILLER I SO I ASST DRILLER GeO Engineering Consultants Inc GeO Engineering Consultants Inc TEST BORING LOG NO. B -3 Project No. 012- 0012 -5424 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT /ENGINEER Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. SITE 4710 Golf Terrace PROJECT Edina, Minnesota Proposed House Hennepin County SAMPLES TESTS a PI D: 19- 028 -24 -22 -0008 T28N- R24W -S79 0 LU 20' north & 3' east of NE house corner -- w> z ADDITIONAL tE w > U DATA/ _ a = F- m Co ow F o REMARKS p a o� U) ?•u. w Surface Elev.: 897.7 ft. Datum: MSL o m z ?? 0 o a o FILL - Mixture of silty clay, silty sand, black to 1 27/48 brown 4 56% 3.0 894.7 6 2 13/48 4.0 ORGANIC LEAN CLAY (OL), very soft, black 893.7 = PEAT (PT), fibric, very soft, tan ' ` 5 WOH 27% WOH 3 24/48 — 2 50% 11.0 886.7 1101 — 10 5 FAT CLAY (CL), silt, soft, gray 4 48/48 7 100% 15.0 882.7 15 7 PEAT (PT), fibric peat with fat clay, soft, gray ' ` 17.0 880.7' �' —'' 9 5 48148 100% FAT CLAY CH), silt, firm, gray 10 20 11 13 25 14 28.0 869.7 15 SILTY SAND (SM) with a little gravel, layers of fat clay, medium grained, wet, medium dense :r 16 to -dense, gray 30- 20 J. 21 ` 35 30 i 25 i 40.0 8573 40- 28 End of boring WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS STARTED 7/14/121 FINISHED 7/14/12 DATE TIME HOLE CASING CAVE -IN WATER NOTE METHOD: Dynamic penetration testing from 0 to DEPTH DEPTH LEVEL 40 feet. Dual tube sampling from 0 to 20 feet. 7/14/12 09:31 40.0 None 4.8 None 7/14/12 10:20 20.0 None 16.0 None EAST NORTH 7/20/12 12:45 14.2 14.2 14.2 5.7 Y DRILL CO. Geo Eng DRILL RIG 54 DT 7/29/12 18:00 14.2 14.2 14.2 5.4 DRILLER SO ASST DRILLER AS GeO Engineering Consultants Inc .0 TYPICAL EXTERIOR DRAINTILE SYSTEM FOUNDATION WALL FLOOR SLAB —\ ,;ate:-; t COMPACTED CLAY CAP MINIMUM THICKNESS: 12 INCHES SLOPE DOWNWARD FROM WALL DRAINTILE COMPETENT SOILS SLOPE SATISFYING OSHA REQUIREMENTS FREE DRAINING BACKFILL FILTER FABRIC 3/8" PEA ROCK OR CLEAN STONE NOT TO SCALE cc- �- V-# ew F /Vt°m,., V .e,-c 7 s A, rl % u 0'+ L-! -1 `/ 0 �- 45 Nice- G,? I ti 7,1.7> 1- 6u l F- S/a c C- c-1-7 l u G v l F- to I -ro•C-e Te! -rc,c 7 :71, MINI 1 6 .41.1 4 -a ��# it. _l* 7_ v ' l%pL� i r7l MUM L'Al TWA All `0Ile c ;Vk fu 1,) c� Iee- 9GI.,it, , ' -1-7la Cc- lf�-- Te, Yew.Ge-- ,ne4� ov Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 1 Interactive Property Parcel 19- 028 -24 -22 -0008 ID: Owner P F Commers & K B Commers Name: Parcel 4710 Golf Ter Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property A -T -B: Abstract Market $849,600 Total: Tax $12,500.44 Total: (Payable: 2012) Sale Map Scale: 1" = 100 ft. N Print Date: 8/28/2012 Residential Type: Price: i This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no Home- Homestead Sale representation or warranty expressed or Stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.42 acres Sale Area: 18,387 sq ft Code:, COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2012 Tt iRk Green! http:/ /gis.co.hennepin.mn.us/Property /print /default.aspx ?C = 4726... 8/28/2012 ay PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # VI.0 Cary Teague August 22, 2012 Planning Director Recommended Action: Approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow the new first floor elevation of a home to exceed the 1 foot maximum increase allowed by ordinance. Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit request to allow the first floor elevation of a new home to be 3.2 feet higher than the existing first floor of the home to be replaced, (2.2 feet higher than allowed by ordinance), due to ground water issues, at.4710 Golf Terrace. INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Property owners Paul and Kristin Commers are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new home at 4710 Golf Terrace. (See site location, photos of the subject property and adjacent homes on pages A.1 —A.4) A Conditional Use Permit is being requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the previous home by more than one foot. Specifically the applicant would like to raise the first floor elevation 3.2 feet above the first floor elevation of the previous home that had occupied the site. The first floor of the previous home was at 902.6 feet. The new first floor is proposed to be at 905.8 feet. The maximum allowed increase without a Conditional Use Permit is 903.6 feet, (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A.5 — A13.) The new first floor is proposed to be 2.2 feet over the one foot allowed by city code in order to reasonably protect the lower level of the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The attached Report of Geotechnical Exploration dated July 24, 2012, from Geo Engineering Consultants, Inc., regarding ground water levels indicates ground water at a level of 892 feet with a recommended lowest floor elevation of at least 894.0 to 895.0 feet, (see report: page A.14). 1 Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Edina Country Club Golf course; zoned and guided low- density residential Easterly: Single- family residential homes; zoned and guided low- density residential Southerly: Single- family residential homes; zoned and guided low- density residential Westerly: Single- family residential homes; zoned and guided low- density residential Existing Site Features The existing 18,417square foot lot is currently occupied by a single story rambler with a two car garage built in 1951. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - Density Residential Zoning: R -1, Single- Dwelling District Grading & Drainage Drainage patterns would generally remain the same. The grading must not impact adjacent neighbors. Final grading and drainage: plan is subject to review and approval of the city engineer at the time of building permit application. The proposed plans will also require a review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 850.04 Subd. 5.E, the.City Council shall not grant a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The proposal for a rebuild of a new single- family home would not have an impact on governmental facilities or services. A single - family home is a permitted use on the site: 2 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; The proposal to rebuild a single - family home would not have an impact on traffic or the capacity of the streets serving the property. The use, a single - family home, remains the same on the property. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; Again there would be no impact, as the use of the property remains the same. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The proposed new home would fit the character of the existing neighborhood. The proposed new home is two stories and there are a number of two story homes within the neighborhood, (See home comparisons on pages A.15 — A.30). 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and The new home would meet all applicable zoning ordinance requirements. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. A single - family home is consistent with the low- density residential land use designation within the Comprehensive Plan. Additional Conditions Per Section 850.11. Subd. 2: Additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions to or replacements of single dwelling unit buildings must meet one or more of the first three (3) conditions listed below, and always meet condition four (4). The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), or the City's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan; or 2. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to reasonably protect the dwelling from ground water intrusion. Existing and potential ground water elevations shall be determined in accordance with accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering practices. Determinations shall be undertaken by a professional civil engineer licensed under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 326 or a hydrologist certified by the American Institute of Hydrology. Studies, analyses and computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow thorough review and approval; or 3. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to allow the new building to meet State Building Code, City of Edina Code, or other statutory requirements; and 4. An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in height, mass and scale. Conditions #2 and #4 above apply to the proposed new home. The proposed new home would have a low floor elevation of 895 The applicant would like the new home to have a 9 foot ceiling height in the basement. An eight to nine foot basement ceiling height within single - family homes in an Edina is typical, even though the minimum building code requirement is seven feet. The inability to go down lower to accomplish an 9 foot ceiling height in the basement, the desire to raise the low floor elevation and an upgrade of building materials from previous building practice will result in the new home being 3.2 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing home and 2.2 feet above the allowable limit per ordinance. The proposed new home would fit the character of the neighborhood. (See pages A.15 — A.30), which shows existing homes in the area). The proposed new home is a two story home with an attached three car garage. There are a mixture of housing styles and periods of construction throughout the neighborhood. There are ramblers to full two story homes nearby. The applicant's builder has indicated that home has been designed with mass and scale to minimize any impact the new home may have on the adjacent homes. n Compliance Table PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposed new home with a first floor elevation 3.2 feet higher than the existing home reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated on pages 3 -4 of this report, the findings and conditions required for this conditional use permit would be met. 2. As demonstrated on the Compliance Table on page 5 of this report, the proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. 3. Because of ground water issues, the basement of the new home must be elevated to a minimum recommended height of 894 — 895 ft. The new first floor height will be at 905.8, the basement providing 9 foot ceiling heights. A basement with an 9 foot ceiling is considered reasonable within the City. l:1 City Standard Proposed Front — Match neighbors 41.6 feet Side — East 10 feet 13.52 feet Side — West 5 feet (garage) 40 feet Rear— 25feet 37.3 feet Building Coverage 25% 19.3% Building Height 35 feet 31 feet PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposed new home with a first floor elevation 3.2 feet higher than the existing home reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit findings. As demonstrated on pages 3 -4 of this report, the findings and conditions required for this conditional use permit would be met. 2. As demonstrated on the Compliance Table on page 5 of this report, the proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards. 3. Because of ground water issues, the basement of the new home must be elevated to a minimum recommended height of 894 — 895 ft. The new first floor height will be at 905.8, the basement providing 9 foot ceiling heights. A basement with an 9 foot ceiling is considered reasonable within the City. l:1 4. The proposed new home is in character within this neighborhood. The home is similar to other homes constructed within the general area. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for a new home at 4710 Golf Terrace. The Conditional Use Permit allows the new home to have a first floor elevation of 905.8 feet which is 3.2 feet above the first floor elevation of the existing. home and 2.2 feet above first floor height allowed by ordinance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The proposed new home .is in character with this neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped July 25, 2012 • Building plans and elevations date stamped July 25, 2012. 2. Submit a copy of the: Minnehaha Creek District permit. The City may require revisions, to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building' permit. Drainage patterns ,may not be directed to adjacent properties. Deadline for a city decision: September 23, 2012 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT o� e APPLICATION N 0 (L�C L�I�' f `tea, A� JUL 2 5 2 92 �O�• • r��D eae �9 • CASE NUMBER DATE 2D 12 FEE PAID City of Edina Planning Department * www.cltyofedina.com 4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826 -0369 * fax (952) 826 -0389 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------- --------------- - - -- FEE: $800.00 APPLICANT: -� 0 NAME: J 1r i� (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: '-/7 6 & l j e PHONE: ?6 76•- 7 EMAIL: Qrc-0V1'N^e'irs cz Ay0- ,C0ki, . CGS PROPERTY OWNER: p 1 G+ tr C �� NAME: 76t, �5 (Signature required on back page) ADDRESS: Lt-7 10 T-e ivaee-- PHONE: 61 Z_b 6— 74.5-7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (writt i and lectronic form): PROPERTY ADDRESS- (-/ -7 / C) 6 5 T-eklle C% Of PRESENT ZONING: P.I.D.# loJ- l�L� ®� �/-2 � 00e8' EXPLANATION OF REQUEST: f (Use reverse side or additional pages if necessary) ARCHITECT: NAME: b Ff PHONE: % t/,.? - -7 8®° ?0 EMAIL: •1 �-i'� co Jt°il�(' e �d Sh . Lv ov, SURVEYOR: NAME: 13 Vo w l'n �vr Ve y ; l-,m PHONE: 't S-Z - ? FV ° L16! ;-- EMAIL: k x/'7 C.- Y ve l (-a GC) Iti{j ln�+ APPLICANT'S STATEMENT This application should be processed in my name, and I am the party whom the City should contact about this application. By signing this application, I certify that all fees, charges, utility bills, taxes, special assessments and other debts or obligations due to the City by me or for this property have been paid. I further certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approvals that have been granted to me for any matter. have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and, to the best of my knowledge, the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. i Applicant's Signature 2372UI2 Date OWNER'S STATEMENT am the fee title owner of the above described property, and I agree to this application. (If a corporation or partnership is the fee title holder, attach a resolution authorizing this application on behalf of the board of directors or partnership.) Owner's Signature Date Note. Both signatures are required (if the owner is different than the applicant) before we can process the application, otherwise it is considered incomplete. W Lc C 2 N E [1 JUL 2 5 2012 'LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 2 Property I Assessing http: / /gis.logis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS /ims ?SeiviceName =ed LOGISMap_OVSDE &ClientVe... 8/2/2012 Page 1 of l //- Z file: / /ed -ntl/ citywide /PDSImages /Photos /1902824220008001.jpg 8/l/2012 Page 1 of 1 /,�, 3 file: / /ed -ntl/ citywide /PDSImages /Photos /1902824220009001.jpg 8/1/2012 Page 1 of 1 file: / /ed -ntl / citywide/ PDSImages /Photos/1902824220007001. jpg 8/l/2012 4710 Golf Terrace Conditional Use Permit Application We are proposing building a new home at 4710 Golf Terrace with a new floor 3.2 feet above the floor height of the previous home (that has since been demolished). This new floor is being built 2.2 feet over the one foot allowed by city code in order to reasonably protect the lower level of the new dwelling from ground water intrusion. The attached documentation from Geo Engineering Company shows the groundwater level at 892 and the recommended lowest floor elevation height of 895. All other dimensions of the new home will meet Edina's zoning rules and the home is designed to fit the character of the neighborhood in height, mass, and scale. The home exterior will feature stone details facing Golf Terrace, cedar shingle siding, and an asphalt roof. These are materials that blend in with the character of homes on Golf Terrace. RECE ED JUL 2 5 2012 d —•�- — + + + i v,ii vl V11 V V L 11V1tli LIhJ � --- FpA[a ' Sa Lary Sexy - - Unaerpwap Bo: O Mwhdo 589'44'47 °E c Gaa Y¢t¢, 136 63 PLAT - • 135 00 Il am¢o nlr rvi y¢h ,� • m,m NR - I �,� —� non¢ : ®o C.V— Trca ,w00 Cwmla Curb Cliq 4¢I [Lxn . - rar.: aWn 6ou - - a9D0.DN Tap W WallZ-- r, V • a911DATC Tap of Cu,b Flewson SCALE: .1 INCH = 10 FEET �9DD— ui¢una F<nleur I'9 I \ I V 1 L- V, I I • Oenetea gan Mwum¢nl Fwna eB[es: FxnNF vaaD ¢ m• b1 Nna -.. 10,4175 Sq. R. 148M . 4LS FL •ec 14709 - 40.9 FL fit. - ° lya v1PFAw0U5 SIBiFACG `} H.w 3.4895 Sq. FL nww9¢ 41.0 FL mg aN _______ •u ____ �T• _____ ____ ' . Tall . Y.4BOS 54 R 9UTi•VpF•aDMRWvaGt ¢�T E K H( 2 R Da/ y WGNn i x --H t¢ u0 ) A R <n � I I I m_ 'u _•_o.M . V m 3 9l . _ ___ M m ry r 0 ' h a mn w uus a'`a CsBRUv0FU1ffiiCT E l T0 NR I1OI8Dwy m-M1 v1T 0®-4].20 9.0 0 R. .. � I I _ BTamoIoM El f g p N4¢ I I Cn m 8 uNl 0pr M 0 aI1A5 nroR¢ Ct Nm ¢o n : a I l I Ea UIryry dTw w a s rlJmNa1 ¢ ro¢cML0aa N. N ¢ 4 •u L Of N E•a 1aw1 lr, 5 a w Clam a aIn ulSm/¢ ns¢ltll aY¢ +. g W :m 81 c Ye9oapi4n n'l o1 n3rt 9CTefir. ma a. ¢nm TiI lwn a w NMuc¢ a N ¢ lNp e md I lBh¢. aL eaRc' c gCrGe a gOrhnIi t 2e 4 . , T F w, HEMH S, Nnpin 0m O0 I m« I • i I NO1C Na SmrtM1 Wu Wtla F- AMY FnaunenW . 71 p\ I I NUTC The bcan¢n of WI ulaili•• ¢ ¢ Iram pN l • g .ua, I I rc I lurrd•had by - ul'dily ramDan a end v I • �a • I a .I I epprca mas UGGI Cv I 1 y nip¢niea abeuU bo n¢tJicd - I Iw ®cllemll¢n belme dune ,ary u ewlbn. I I I I I I I I I I I I I hereby —Uly N l W. eurwy. Mae duly v mWt w pwp—d by )_ ar umv my mrca sap¢,MVpn aw. at I ¢m a r¢91a1¢r¢a i . 136.53 PLAT thUM Sarwyar wa¢r the mwa ar lha S DI Mlm—,. 0 '44'47W n¢v. ' W. Mi l D SIIRVLYDIC, WC. Wa9tlmw A Brawn, RLS MN REG 15230 G 0 L F T E R R A C E —a- W. BROWN ��✓�C J L - J...���j / J ��" �' 11/�� / —f� '� ,�tri/ '� / R / `/ •y /_ �� - - BDSIi ryFaLar¢d. , .,. m l SURVEYING. ¢ sa a .. 4 swl ¢ zza II DmPS a2) , ux -5425 ( B-05 5 . FaN76 -12 DaFe! 05 -23 -3012 86 -12 122/70 Sda: 1 mu, . ID F¢a1 1 G SITE ADDRESS: GOLF TERRACE EDIN EDIN A, MN 55424 I EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY FOR: - Legend GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES —SAN— SaNtory Saev 589'44'47•E -- —pYIR= Wabr 136t�53 PLAT _1OQa� + 736.531 A5. —_ a_L .— , Iumx lwEa�la *m6a wmar9raana I:n . 135.00_ _ �%— O NanNab o an iota I mm 1 m¢ onvm m - I ap P 1pr , onai, ai[ Hv+m� 0 Poav Polo .art • Q Oacbuoua Trea m �� •� mrw +'?q I aymrs i� �Ils C Wlf c Ten apnwla curb , 41�' .800.0 E umq spot El—van jp p A -� T /'� R\ r r /-� T .I SCALE 1 INCH = 20 FEET ap00•� Tap of Woa Oa U- A I v I L. V I I A900.0m Top of Cub 0a U- maa I Sao— E.9 Contour I n r� I ' araumvn V r I aaaaW ban Ymumml FauM , 1 O Oenoln Imm Pape f�baae Wp _.. ma. m x/ bnmyrd ww» ee 15210. mat mm ! alA �-- U �! TaMri mi a60L - -11DT— mR vi �OCOSFa�F1y. p(IS11l10 MFAS: ��• ° o m lot Area . 10,4173 Sq. R. tot Mm - 18,4171 Sq. FL _ a OIPFA17alJ; SURFACE N1pE0'AW6 SURFACE __—�-- �m - --- �' 'ty proWMd Hoioa .3.5551 Sq. FL Eablbp Haum - z49p1 so- Fl. .J / LTJ • _ �r1 D. N Total . 3A553 Sq. FL Total a x490! Sq. FL . 1922E 1 "S f99M m FlriRy.B6L3 � m C olRANO ImGllr.7].5 Fr� FD Ffto rpHOUSE L.. M ° F80M TARO FRST nWF. -(QM Q .- N 149M . 420 Fl. h /{iap E 1479d . 4(Lfi 41. R Avvo9a . 41.fi FL / gI ENeaE FL00N.901A HDGHa4.0 6minwc 11pGXfti105 R. Bum J4710 Plapowz RK Floor an'Aab . (NU) as Vio o I 1 •, •a •r` -Aj '•la °roiunf�F'. 4y� y,� " �a Thol purl of lot f, obck 2. lylnp Wut N a Ilnn Inp lho • -P . , ' a '� • 1 at rl9hl onplai fmm Narlh We o1 �5ecflan 7B, Nmi9e 24 at a palm a daluca at 135 feat Wml from Nv Naahweal Coma of lal 1, '. 1- :::• ?., ° arnw I I lWrdl 3. l d db9 ad =t pat or waalna atmlt, aOIF TMRWE HEIGHTS. IlaanaZ Caunly. 1f ne.+nla. I � �'I�'�4• I 1 I i I I 1 I ewCHMA : Tl �.a Cabs c�m.da0 —uan 69909626. 1erWn ° 1 mnu.4�'e g1 NOTE No S.- Waa Mndv For My Eoaama.. I • � , ". I MOM Th. 1—U. or a0 U. shoo. an Ram plom I :. l- s I I aa M ahad by the uUGly avmpvnka and vo r vro.b t I ��u!� ��Campenln Mauls h. gC°1%fa! all.. •. - 136.53 PLAT .: s ' • • ',W47aW I Y. �p Il�m O t ., ' •+ -•. w I JUL 2 5 2012 ' •. � • .... , mp ,c l n.mby assay Inal uda eurvpy. pbra or raporl am —paaa by S room vart ais mn m ob l ands my almal mr— of L m,a Owt I am a dab. n94bnd tans sar..yar.pnda u. mN. ar m. sml. of e6nandn. --------------- G0 L F T E R R A C E W. 6— ua 5a �, " °' m W. BROWN INC. nLAND naSURVEYING, NN 55115 �`cowa 9uc: (952) 854 -4055 M, aAt -wan Woodror A 0rv1m. ILLS. MN RE(; 15230 Fac (952) 1154 -4260 41 -12 REF. 86 -12 122/70 0o1e6 ai- z3 -zalz ravbq: Datel Oi- n -z6lz 141 -12 Sable: 1 lad, . la Fan' 1 OP 1 INA, CO . A : .. .1 - � C, E -9%7 E I - ---------- RECEOME® S r ULS 3 `� -__L� _ jam« 6 [Lfj jail, ZZ molt TR,LL�s> =-6 ,MZC: j351MT GIL'11nlc� li'! I �YFif}DL' = f -D luc�ttsW roo ar- roulut= LOOrs, JULY5�i? Page 1 of 1 Scot# Busyn From: Ahsanur Siddique [ahsan @geoenginc.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 20121:51 PM To: Scott Busyn (scottbusyn @comcast.net) Subject: Water Level Monitoring, 4710 Golf Terrace, Edina, MN Scott, We installed a piezometer at about 20 feet north and 3 feet east of northeast corner of existing house on July 14, 2012 to monitor water level. The surface elevation at this location is about 897.7 feet based to lot survey. On July 20, 2012, we measured water level in the piezometer. Water level was 5.7 feet below the ground surface and which corresponds to elevation 892.0 feet on July, 20 2012. We will take another water level reading by the end of this week to verify any change in water level elevation. We understand existing house will be demolished and a new house will be constructed at his site. The new house will be a two -story with full basement. The structure will be of wood frame construction supported on foundation walls. It is our opinion that the lowest floor elevation of the new house should be at least 2 to 3 feet above water level. Based on our water level reading on July 20, 2012, the lowest floor elevation should be at least 894.0 to 895.0 feet. After final water level reading, we can provide more specific recommendations. If you have any questions, please feel free to call us. Thanks, Ahsanur R Siddique PE Geo Engineering Consultants Inc PO Box 21490 Minneapolis MN 55421 ahsan @geoenginc.com email 763.502.9945 Phone 763.502.9946 Fax 612.384.3245 Mobile Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus / Spyware Database: 6.20200) htto://www.octools.com 7/30/2012 14 d GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES GREAT LOCATIONS I GREAT DESIGN I GREAT QUALITY July 23, 2012 To: Cary Teague, Planning Director - City of Edina From: Scott Busyn - Great Neighborhood Homes Subject: CUP Application for 4710 Golf Terrace Neighborhood Character Study We are submitting the attached documentation showing how the new home being proposed at 4710 Golf Terrace will fit the character of the neighborhood in height, mass, and scale. 4710 Golf Terrace is located on the west and of the block overlooking Edina Country Club. As can be seen in attached photos, the homes on Golf Terrace are stately in nature and represent an eclectic collection of homes built in the 40's, SO's, and several recently constructed homes. Many homes styles can be found including cape cod, ranch /rambler, colonial, French provincial, Modern, and American cottage /shingle. The homes are all set far apart on large lots with many mature trees. It is very evident that this is an area of transition with many new homes and remodels in progress. The proposed home at 4710 Golf Terrace will be a two story home with rooflines that are designed to reduce the mass and scale of the home by having the eve lines come down to the first level ceiling. This gives the home the character of a "story and a half' home that can be found on other homes in the neighborhood. In addition, all four sides of the home are being designed with character details (detailed windows, gables, stone, shed roofs, etc) to avoid any type of "movie screen" facade. The west and east sides of the home have been designed with a smaller mass and scale than the front elevation (facing Golf Terrace). This will allow for a better blending of the new home with the two adjacent homes. We have also made an effort to avoid blocking the sitelines of the golf course for the adjacent homes. The proposed home will fit the character of the neighborhood by using quality materials such as cedar shingle siding, stone, detailed window trim and corbels, and divided light windows. In addition, the new home will have a stone chimney, a feature common on older homes in the neighborhood. Please let me know if you would like to see additional information or feel free to call me anytime at 962 - 807 -8765. Thankyou. ®r, SCOTT BUSYN ARGARET BPJ.5yN _ •• PHONE 952 -807 -8765 1 SCOTT.BUSYN @COMCAST.NET PHONE 952 -80 @COMCAST.NET 4615 WOODDALE AVENUE, EDINA, MINNESOTA 554241 FAX 952- 926 -1168 MN BUILDERS LICENSE # BC- 521688 A lz�r . �•�� ► >F rr ` ' }'.i*yyt.•ty��'� '' 1 t'.'t.. �. ,4 - .i' ' ice, ;..'- • ^S' { � _ r ��yr�' �Sa � ��a� a ;�'r "f` ri/ _ • r�� . . -� f�i.: 'l. •3._ -'.i6 � .;.�� 1 " -f •: {�•r {•t : ^e +� �l� • � +'.. ~ �.����1�.:.ta�� , : ,�}( ��: i.>-b ..� �;:•f'. t2'... `• `,.t;.� -'':l Al w �"'RG� • Airs•' i` . •'f ," fi. sim- I�sae� I �� ' A ..-�. �_¢��'••^C1`tt+�'fi'^44T �.w. .�_., -'� _ -'- �- .f°'• '• ti% . ,`��''� �a { I ...I �' — 1q —�'� -6 �t1171•al� 1rty� f�• ++ ' - `Lr�l •' �'_l�. ,.a t� ' o '' tg ..( r _::.: - ..y -. 7•J.'L( j"t ' 1 x t`''��`oc�ctji`Y'.r. a �, -- is r � .. .. '.' r �� '. ,•*iy�n ' ' ..yam _ I I .� r { f. - f . •y� (- Ili -`•� •K � J •. i :� _� a,"! .�t K.A�'''1•�.t: z�yl.Iy_R. •L19iVK•xh - . egg V J . .T'� �:• of Ny �_� 4k •' T• '1� ,(� i.r . I^ FF -• � � �• Y• � • Sim ,� v .�:•s. a }f•_ t� �_� 'W• ••.��.�• .�jlr ■• .' � � •L, •"�r � 'w'r:' t IP zo "%• AY � • � a': i���•,,. • = ;� i � j✓tr � ' �' • _TTpp" ."''�'' its �• •• r •v ..� � ., � 1. •.ftF_ - 'r7.''�' i Mme.• yy , + :.'y�`• s'�'t9+' = "io t 1 •+�.: 1 _. bt A�lk a"L, 'a• �' ea' s' fit. rS'3 J —r1 JF Y .. .. - _ _ �' •��~ � � '�`' >�:'!,i' {; D- •.w' i. C.',Wr. � �Y � ..�i..�n•.'••.�1 "rte' „ "�• �: ` -,�'. p 9 I „ ry.r'%n• i y",'��_. ns: : '' � t �i - `i!:r'. ,� . �l r i ,� ti: t' w _ �t '. �. DIY` . ;• •w'_ ! . �, � y 2 � `q�•,�_j1C fd..11. � � ti� �' µ W � �t, •/• .I - 44e ., e L, •''r i yY�� �C� _i:; - :y�V��y �,e, , 4 G I - • -. JJ a!1". y�s,�•. � •• �, •. �i «. �.ly;� "y_ N•�'' r`n -.• ��•�. ,�• _- x � «r su ^•y.T ,i=P i:S•� ,♦ . -�L'r� ' ••�; -w, .'�i. ,,Lr �! ry�r�.''�'a' -�y�, ,I " :��" i',�:`},. ...'•a�• •s.. � �� • h^ ''• ' �T • Iiit � - a• !. - . `• • . �' • "RRff �. 1� .7C,' ill. A' •.. d i1. r - .� Jr ! Y , •;.$� �•.1 �7r. 4i • - •,I xf- ��: M. .y..,r. r � '. . � ,� . .•.q::.�° � � • �;Y � • r�'v-- at_ - ?a " � . �.e •� 1` �•R�• ,j �! _ *.r,y - �sl[ � � � •, . v •' 1, � � • ir�r.. _ •! -r • . +��. �. � �. «�! •'e • l ' i'i , ice". .. � '_ _,�". "y. t. j► ••�.� i '�. �, -.. �^ - I -,pk VL .:e�S, .i1• #'�ryy •.r • y�rt „' of _ 7 f '•• �`.• ': � Z• iA” '� �'- , 1'� i `��' -" -y E`d�: 'tip. • •is r: ,k�. •y Y'. �_• ��. .1• '�,. «• ,•rs..b:.�4. � -J %__^ ��tt �_r•�'. -�• r+ ., r -.. �� .++:`4ry.Y-`e� - �•� -• �� d ���,••, ^ 'it. _ `Y.•Y. � "m•- ' • - .� =-'•'! 1.i �ytl "�5.•. � � Ot't� -�.�.• •. w's -• 1�'' •.•. •�ti _ ^3.7 ♦ .•�. p-. --.a i %.r ~ r, rt 4 �.fal t " i 7 �' ��, --f$ • }• - - -_ �•..ili�A'J+G• �iL �ilr•,'y' s• ,. a � •y11r•.•y�'. ..^ _�.: s .�y : � r r.�f - - .._.. 'S•tl' Trys��ry�''^ r �l s� 4 •,' "w.:Tr,..it, s�' - EFy , k':° .' ,;r�yar. t.j� t' - �$+ f rr , 83. ' ID �'S, „ ' '�` I a.• _ ', y.,(. - rPrl.:�trlal 4 a: rf , a . �_�� P y� �a � I_ .��•.4w •__—: ._ y •t � a „•, .•y I : '�`' --� _ 1rt'"'�''' - � ,n� , ..• @ i t 1J :S � y ' .���y8.i , Nova, C i I I i. as ' � re wM, 3 Iw�E a a� . } - Jam•.. - Vs - - - - - •.u� �xaT;`"' y rl�L,t". w'°�Y 4.: r,; w Wo N •.t ..?JF 3�Yt �ul 9� V'� i - ''.r�f�_.•�S" ... tom; ..� '' :r... •l... lift AJF � � �'�? jt;�'�SVy. .7� $ ^�G: 1 yr���`:.y��� 14• - y� �`t'''y..- •! •w %���!ry, 7�,,,,1 'i.,. I o :':.Ar t•T. ..fir -'yv.. lyf�� ^� .p , .'!. a - .� -- •f' ter. t,� -i� rL.. y '4 JF - .?Y .•, �ZS•:'+.• I . ". • ! �y�Y - r ' � `.. •••r • t h / � `'� {�j ���� ._ T-'w. '. , y "-i . +�' •ENS � �' � ..a� ,./y _ - '+'' ♦ .. y - .r_ r „�i ma y. y •-M'•' ') ' d . f'fi • , Al, A. 1.t'/: -, y_.ti;�i • r. r - •�7.1• d - - .".•rte. `-� 1 � � ''i ` • � ..�. .. 3= -- ' - �. n � �:° r � � tit .� .�,i••,,, . � µ, •'! _�� � .��� �'�" a - _r' ill 33 � �,:► �.;• _a► g� I`I^ _ _ _ I R � �'S!d ,al i,'?.L: ' 1 I . ,� y �k'_`�.°_ - �' � � . � �,,,,,,s. -d•.= ��• .., I. , Ali-- I � „ t c m �m _. _. ,vw.cr.v. ALA C"�-A N� .I ` u ^• {. lY- '4, ••, tJ)Y V'F' _ .�sa �-r..!"etyal:_ -W'PV:•Ta yr. 1�.. fT- is IN llwl Fill! Tz '::l 'd 1 }�V!�'j �iVI - �T i,J4 ♦ I ., I.� I �, � .1 I • ^I T'•'�I l ir. _�ryti 1 I' ! I it I f 1 a�.:.ra.�r rrr r r I � l .. ,dY r -• I `-''YN� v.. �' Y IA ..y � �,. �r _G • ik �r T�,J}" i� w GIs �r ai;p, c. 'F.�, �1 � �L d� � r ruc.cv.�nia ��f 14�',",�'�'�f`il�i �Sr{r''�i.�'�'��r�1'�a.- '..':S Tsui ,3�'a°i;�'L..�_, .t ����r?,.tF• i' i1'..•♦r . 1 r_ fir:, •�=. :,y � , _ r� -:: � . '�".-s- .t,rtt 1. - -- M^�.-td.�•k�Ja_� �. J,..i� - ,satin^ ?514,�n '�, +�w.i } -, F6 -. `e z' =' S�"y ';� j °�a"5�,''-�c� °I w� - e- ra "` ...�,� - -.. -- ,. - ,!:.._ •._ vr^+ A :� i. r`h L. „p, raK• _ S � "I.yr.%1�tt �'f�'h� t � ,i ��T' ~��SC srl r'� ?Ka .:� G. I 1- _ r' :::x,,.. ' -'Vw1i '� +�`.. 4�i�`" ..an�s��.'..�� ^ ri.. -��:r S•"r,.�Se., -~. :. I s : ...> . .... , . 1 - ,i Wr'n A7 ' '•' 1 '. V'-L •fi�.t�- ,1..5' 3 O: Itee oil nj 4 . �' C�� !1�i.�(l�.j`T•gYn.4�.:.�ll�lh . .... _�.,�r.I'�fr.1:wY.t�xntiw,.:1a"" : �::.I...1.,,.;..�s._.lyc_ ��i.1».�^.?!i'�Ew �ri�i+'!L>j'.� i of �� � � � •ate � .: �e r 'J i nN ......... ..... ;FF IL-Mi 41 jo iA- • �"w.,.. Ohl'`. ..p1,�s� � r�.��� 'S`yr 1.. - r �t�. - - \e�1.'.�ae��6'_1ci. �. A;,,fA��RJ 1 1 �i t � %• ����_! • ,. ` -atr_r �f,. � r _ �,� �R�m ( M• '1 _ _ -• _ .yam - Qm M1 1A �: PJ ►n_ _ - - I,r , IJ .y 1 a Jai .��'1 •' � ' - � �(�n r i l ; - i Iv111!' IGt7w1961gIiP , •�••••• , �. 74 t �' r ! . �• A'p�. "t If A +,t. }!, @@[Qx1 \9RiFJgtitlllYL'lir • , f[,t \ &1}: 'r° - r .0 } In n r vtl,y y,,;'•6 +Jl.rl.u,.y Muol: t at aratl !.. ' '.;'• - r. rf to 1. 1 r ,. h 11 .0 1R1C 1 •t • y+ a�, +, c uu.. ti i i�'ec ,-!-.'n �,"^i.11 L9t i.falnK�y,1' //we...\�' ��!•.:' w yt' a. I r'. '�, - " .N /• _ •� l., i17 f 1 1 11,M I / `+',1. \,• 1 �1 , I•.. ' '.il,: `7'•: +�'I'' �.rt Ja. ! tea: 'vc a iniri, ,Mi '-A 1;119 qt �r Fi7ria i u �i t'. l %rae�, / �% A14, tk. •ti �'�,. � i r..y• �.^ t '•` a } ;;y yn[, sA t a +Vt 1.; [lyl.F�'sl�wN�l !n , ai'� -,`.lt r a"�RCV ,�, / //��'1Lr�G T,I,.r, _ Y .. ' 4r�.•. . '-.;= ..•+trr; v ?/ .. , � �i,. �J,•t It t'k,. `Q 1, �rRaq Ll! //��I �•'�':'' }: ,. c. •,. , I i, -IRO '• i,:� ' mg ' ' �• • ,Jn '�7�t�rr -i" i!, �. � +� 1 t ,! , � � •Olt, 4u .. ,- J� 411'1 rj�f "Y: . - . .`., _ . I t- v . i '�'' fi� �- CFl�6 ='r``\ �: �. - Ir �� � ti , r i t ,t! t + l i r. � ��/ r +,� -y.�.•� �: � ' • .. ��� �� '� JL l\` I -fi lr.. / ffY• JF/1 I :. rL.l l �'Y I / :J.- � -t�tl I `�ir..�yltl•.� �"• .<�., 'ari F•I -j; •, /� /r�!?' I :.��- I j %aY �• - u� - ! �•�r�5== �i.�•1 �." C. �y IKi I � I' � i��if _ \;r - i � �` ti. !, %:t a•., }.' � . - - 4•sdu• iA`d61 1•�' l J 1 .. - - \ x�• `, ^`yt Gs�t�ir� ���'�1 1+ II. F!,' -/ � ��' � t ' • I . - +• ` to 'b� ASr`� k r.. I /.f/f, -�'' �,,� ,, � Y �� � t .QUS,:• . -r .,_. I � I. ,���� t -aL 9'I! .. - C!• .c. �... L ., Li'.i ='. �1.. `n..' :`,•+ I :;'.. .'�:3! 'e+sa:'• CAI A `�j ��, 1 C- �_��76T' • fin.;' /J 1'•5...}gT, -n!V^' - _ 1Am vn'y'� I �, �r•I glow VC Mail { u�L �= .� m p.�° i�shsJi: i' t'�y� oq� •''',�,�.Y�t� u. I Clpa: 4 ;!!1ji ..' - ' PWr l° J�T��s1�7� -�,�1 ,,r� ,i (r °� • s� ri. * �° . � "ri'v,� . • y;��7,s{•e - w „? ^:•r • _{t ,�, � �' i r' : r11 .. F L' y '+,` , `s W •;�{ '� , � � ��I y � j � +yam: � ,..� i ' � "�'• .. - ,,^4 a:� � ,••�' �i :.1 \ .oF _ „tIT' . , +, I �. ;x �€a . A � ni . �+ ��I' ,y,,r.�. � `� • .i. -•„°�' 1 1 _ �� s \ } r�•l'.c�ts ' .�`��_'� + ' tt, � y {t y�, r. - "b iir., '!4 CI@ - .. .q, '�' - e. I _ t e�J'6•• pi Ac ••i�' � • �• i . �, �y f ,r re i,.�.�'�• t r ,I>' �)K^ .a�__ _ Sri ,r M s.• y•��. , ���p t •� .�Mltna� � { � {'F -Ir\ J4 -��'���� ,.T�'f•! t Y � e'I• S:' r . x.,1 (r � � � t I !. _ `: t ' „�nr t- r�' ` `h �Q, J(� :Y.Tcr�.'.' =�„7� •A ° r t �? I i {I +.• rl Ii •'lt tFa��rr�\._i,�r..r p"S'� /� I I �t i''y tY � t , I I � I I � . ..I ; r -:: ..�� - itiI,j✓,i� (, -t ij, � . - ,.•�. -:j' r � T y.. ) t tt r �! �. t stir •� `'1sti 7, t -. � I' ' t � I � 14 ;0,1 . ............ i,7.;4:- LJ AZ II 1 191 7x.., 91 .. be Job OKI gh 1 144, aPm X4 4 ul r7_ Z�2 ., E .: cc ry Eli Aaoll o NMI vW; F4,j i; J?il V6 I rl 'di . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rl 'di 71" ".17".. ty 116. AM. AM 044; .-CAP Q' 7 B-o (i TI. 44--, NZ eE f ir lomo V - Mr ' r f s x{11•"' r+ J •'� � '....► • 'h ;. . �%.' � f; f,1!1 ..' _ r 1. l .'� ' * � 2'2'S6.�` ,r /;', -.ti S'- 'fir'.' YM! l I •I �+, �4y, fyw .',,rl, +c• _ _ / _. f R '.3a �.+ I "+u- 9/•'�(:'�,/� '�4• ! i' P, rf.. .R l�f� rr ry N .a ,n •J=•. _`s'"~ lk tipb h ` +; rT vy ;�tr! ^" + 11 to f •i sJ� �' {,^, G'�. y„ 'rid• 9� C ` A� X' .� - r l .,S•s►e"�fIPn r!s / 7 . d1 �A Xj'Y� ; ,y+e . ! °T.IiN �.+ �;Ca ; � r' .r'l �.�'r • -r�� Y'' yj - � . iR' �'' �, ��; "� it T ..- '�'.'� �s�1 ice' �S'r, 1 r �,1 1t•.gwi+�j 3'aii 't,f ,..I.. r,��,„ -r ++ ... •. or IA r �f � � � 1� j( f: ^.: ;c.; �x��.- ,�i''��, � � r�"ne �:, P' f,,���. S' g L �, +; #•.3ra,,•� - . •. �y' j. L r�, � �AI 1�y �•N_e.,+pfryyy�r�i+r. 7�z J� �.+1r�'�i,"� � a�4 'r .u� . - M1 ' 1 � � � �J • r,nY1?e�J•'�3�! VIA} - ♦.✓ �J• .'! r ��4 `.s � '.'��.. b -` ; ,r �� � t � I'�r � rf �{, t . "`a�irlFk C r. � 'C•,��, ' � Y� l r - �� .,rr � YC � �•. F. ,i5�'� ..:R .t .rf .'�.y;;YsL>�,'�„4 i ..f� h 3�r �..R � / '' �1 I r .f _ ` _ _rklr �Tl -- � �- ` e. ��` , i'rf 7 r" ""_ V'1.7'+e7a•' _ __ �4 .� r a I � ���yXi4 / °firla'r ! ' -'i?'y �' T (, y • t �I �*% Fr n I 1 t• f,-+ f '.frt��rk�''iaa "�1.�'!L � .�'!�«. y+ � '-;` � .s$r�'�n7i- a}Hli��•�'�`r��;_?�ti �'d�c�,�1,L:_7`:�h�:. °• .- ...ice_. , •.� - . -.... .- -. _._ _...�.�._.^i�J ��. r' •' j ..+ li^(RY" c71 - Ls .r" ,a �_. ��!N� r4.� �I I f �� b �,}�ta ,h��e, �I ,: i : 1 „• I • - I .�': i jam,'. � 7 �.R � ,'Y I i.�'FG� a Pd '«`` :�� , ••_I•s i , '�� :A TO ,s,'4 ac 31r ,.R,;. m .- � 'K- K �.. u . •� -1 +, •" '',' S ••* 1X.'�+ v . : . W ;y%' ,,i' sr =. •p p• sjl;�. i�rt I _: ++�fi�tt��,, ��yy � i � .� � � ��� 7��• rx � -` �ti "+ .TAN I � � �°`m � � a1, a � � 1 •� y a f a IiFit w;;t iJ ��� 2 � •„ L:fi�'+r °M1 • 1 ;�.It .�� �.d �t ��.Ai. `�,, .. �' '!i.• � � � ".�yr���_ F �L .X4 r •tr S �7 ^* �'u �,� I 4 �� � ��:.'j�. ,�`Fr'r +�'�',; rs.���� n,i..ea �• ���. ''�� !. „� "��'y + �.�."+."^"�• ,VAS' i- , -V+#fa �.' � •+...i� } - ,.r �jI.': �'1• x`, '' r�rr- ri .Y _• �= ' ' 'CIF, �.t+ _ - , I .c low f a " � l ��d�',•����r � �, r ti n ,?r�'kL I"n �r s i {u?'( �l, I� t .: I �� I,'9 ''�•s �., "•�'♦ - ,'_:+.�'.yp '11 `I' T II t,. F, .� t �• d .I "i F3w 1 ER• 1 -LR f r'1r iEIGi 7 , I '� � Yr 1i �'� � I 1 M1Y I ` •' i�a�� ui 'I� � � Sh +��. 1_ S IS, - i � ' _TJ <<�• i �� � ��i� ri- 7• �. _ I � •� -*+ 'y� `f Y'1 br {+� 1. g�tt�Ii�+'�yfi�,�L +� t�• {:J?�:�``; a�: _,�` i t' ` r '�I�i:`E �� ` r.iS� ?+7 tll dFt ��� :5.��•� �i��} �Z ',- 1!�4'��s+S'Sl�TT�' +i+tiJ�' {G� I7 - .'1 - �In2 "1w >f.�?'G �2%P+;_idCrE'?.+..��.Y�''I ,a7- .I_ a. ...�ru 1.. _,..J� xJ. - � ?'�•+e5 �.�.•��r�' .. _.�I. i.�:.f r .- -r��,- ... Y. �t. i �•!w � .�jlq' �.:,�� GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES GREAT LOCATIONS I GREAT DESIGN I GREAT QUALITY To: Kris Aaker - City Of Edina From: Scott Busyn - Great Neighborhood Homes Date: August 28, 2012 Subject: Supplement to CUP Application for 4710 Golf Terrace Dear Kris, Please find attached supplemental materials for our CUP application for 4710 Golf Terrace: 1. Final Soil Boring Report showing recommended low floor elevation of 895 for new home at 4710 Golf Terrace to protect the dwelling from ground water intrusion. 2. Streetscape to scale showing new home at 4710 Golf Terrace between existing homes (4800 and 4708). This is being presented as support that the new home at 4710 Golf Terrace will fit into the neighborhood in height, mass and scale. Key things to note: a. New home fills in roofline flow of two homes by being at the approximate average height of the two adjacent homes. New home is well below allowable 40' ridge height for homes on lots greater than 75' b. New home is narrower than home to west (4800) and close to the width of home to east (4708) c. New home is positioned on site to be roughly equal distance between 4800 and 4708 (44.13' and 47.2', respectively). d. Design and materials of new home (stone and cedar shingles) allows for good architectural blending between the all brick colonial (4708) to the east and the brick and wood siding colonial cottage style the west. 3. Additional photographs to show existing site and its adjacency to the pond in the rear and Lake Harvey across Golf Terrace. 4. In addition, I reviewed all Edina building permits issued in 2012 for new single family homes over $500,000 in valuation. Of these 16 homes, 14 homes have 9' basements. Thanks again for all the time and effort in reviewing our CUP for 4710 Golf Terra \ Please let me know if I can provide additional information or answer any ques '► SCOTT BUSYN MARGARET B 1 ,� PHONE 952 - 807 -8765 1 SCOTT. BUSYN@COMCAST.NET PHONE 952-807-87661 MB ASTIN 4615 WOODDALE AVENUE, EDINA, MINNESOTA 554241 FAX 952- 926 -116 J MN BUILDERS LICENSE # BC- 521688 #. 0 GeO Engineering Consultants Inc PO Box 21490 Minneapolis MN 55421 Phone 763.502.9945 Fax 763.502.9946 August 9, 2012 Mr. Scott Busyn Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. 4615 Wooddale Avenue Edina, MN 55424 RE: Geotechnical Exploration Program Proposed House 4710 Golf Terrace Edina, Minnesota Project Number: 012 - 0012 -5424 This report presents the results of the geotechnical exploration program performed for the Proposed House at 4710 Golf Terrace in Edina, Minnesota. In accordance with your authorization on April 26, 2012 and July 12, 2012, we have conducted a geotechnical exploration and subsurface water monitoring program for the planned construction. Our work scope under these authorizations was limited to performing three dynamic penetration test borings, install one piezometer and monitor water levels for two weeks, and providing an engineering report that includes logs of the borings, a sketch indicating the locations, and our engineering recommendations for foundation support. The purpose of this report is to present the results of our field exploration and the associated engineering review. The field work was performed on April 28, 2012 and July 14, 2012. The borings and piezometer were put down at the locations shown on the attached sketch. The surface elevations at the boring locations were interpolated from lot survey and are only approximate. The surface elevations at boring locations should be verified by the surveyor. Soil classification was performed in general accordance with American Standards for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D2488. The subsurface conditions suggest a soil profile consisting of existing fill underlain by swamp deposits, fine alluvium and coarse alluvium. In general, 3 to 6 feet of fill were found at the surface. The fill is underlain by very soft organic lean clays and silts, peat, and fat clays up to depth of 17 feet near the northeast corner of the existing house. In addition very soft silty clays and loose clayey sands were noticed below the fill near the southwest corner of the existing house. �iy�;ING,�`pAwR�M�;�T P pUG � g 2012 CITY 4� EI14A Project Number: 012 - 0012 -5424 Page 2 The coarse alluvium consists of sands and silty sands in medium dense to dense conditions noticed at borings B -1 and B -3 to the depth of exploration Water level measurements were made in the boreholes during and at the completion of the borings. Based on this data, initially no water was noticed at the time of our field work. A piezometer was installed at boring B -3 on July 14, 2012 to measure the water level over time. Based on two water level measurements in the piezometer on July 20 and July 29, 2012, water level was measured at 5.7 and 5.4 feet below the present grade, respectively. In general, water may fluctuate throughout the year depending on several factors. We understand the existing house will be demolished and a new house will be constructed. The new house will be a two -story with full basement. The structure will be of wood frame construction supported on load bearing walls and possible interior columns. Currently, we have no information on actual foundation loadings. However, we anticipate the maximum column loads may be on the order of 75 kips and perimeter wall load will not exceed 3 kips per lineal foot. The existing fill, peat and very soft fat clay should not be relied upon for new foundation support because of their limited strength and compressibility potential. To remove and replace these soils will require 14 to 17 feet of excavation at the boring locations. Conventional excavation and refill procedure are not desirable due to shallow water level, excavation oversize requirements and proximity to nearby structures. In our opinion a deep foundation system of helical compression anchors is suitable for supporting the proposed house. Other deep foundations may be used, such as driven piles. However, because of relatively smaller size project, near the existing structures and potential vibrations from driven pile installation, in our opinion, a deep foundation system of helical compression anchors may be more applicable and is recommended at this site. Helical compression anchors have the advantage of minimal site surface disturbance. In addition, there is little or no potential negative (downdrag) load on the anchors from the compressible soils. We recommend the foundation system consist of helical compression anchors. A helical configuration consisting of three helixes of 10, 12 and 14 inches in diameter may be used. The capacity for this anchor configuration should be 20 kips per anchor. Other configurations will yield different capacity. The capacity includes a safety factor of 2.0 against soil bearing failure. The maximum final torque of each anchor should be documented to verify the capacity. In addition, a quick load test may be performed on one or more anchors to determine the actual anchor capacity attained. The floor slab should be supported structurally to bear on the helical foundation system. To achieve the capacity, we anticipate the helixes to bear within the dense sand below 35 at the explored locations. We estimate the anchor lengths to be on the order of 35 to 40 feet Geo Engineering Consultants Inc Project No. 012- 0012 -5424 Page 3 below the existing grades. An experienced contractor should be consulted for specific details and installation. All perimeter foundations in heated building space should be placed at a minimum depth of 42 inches below exterior grades for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed at any convenient depth below the floor slab. In unheated areas where deeper frost penetration may occur, we recommend that the foundations have a minimum soil cover of 60 inches for frost protection. We recommend that a minimum 4 -inch thick, free - draining granular layer be placed under the floor slabs. This layer should consist of uniformly - graded sand or gravel with less than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve. In addition to facilitating fine grading for easier slab construction, the granular layer provides a capillary break to minimize moisture transmission from the subgrade to the floor slab. Backfill placed behind foundation walls in the lower level area will exert lateral loads against these walls. The lateral loads could be minimized if free - draining granular soil is used as backfill immediately against the walls. The granular soil should contain no more than 10 percent material passing the #200 sieve, and preferably no more than 40 percent material passing the #40 sieve. The backfill soil should be compacted in layers to at least 95 percent of the Standard Proctor maximum dry density. Use of free - draining granular backfill, the foundation walls should be designed for an at -rest earth pressure coefficient of 0.4 or an equivalent fluid pressure of 50 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), considering the backfill has a unit weight of 125 pcf. In addition to soil pressure, water behind the walls may exert additional pressures. However, the use of relatively permeable soils as recommended above will minimize the risk of water accumulating behind the below grade walls. An exterior draintile system may also be installed for additional protection. The draintile system should be installed below the level of the lowest footing on the outside of the foundation wall, and should be surrounded by at least 6" of washed, coarse aggregate material which is enveloped in a geotextile fabric. The draintile should be connected to a suitable outfall or sump where water can be discharged from the system. We are including a typical exterior draintile system sketch. Based on our recent water level reading we recommend the lowest floor should not be lower than elevation 895 feet to minimize the potential for wet basement conditions. All excavations should comply with the requirements of O.S.H.A. 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations and Trenches ". This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Reference to these O.S.H.A. requirements should be included in the project specifications. G @O Engineering Consultants Inc Project Number: 012 - 0012 -5424 Page 4 Professional judgments and recommendations are presented in this report. They are based partly on evaluation of the technical information gathered, partly on historical reports and partly on our general experience with subsurface conditions in the area. We do not guarantee the performance of the project in any respect other than that our engineering work and the judgment rendered meet the standards and care of our profession. It should be noted that the borings represent the conditions at the time and location of the borings only. No representation is made of conditions at other times and locations. The recommendations presented in this report are applicable only to this specific project. These data should not be used for other purposes. If there are any questions regarding the data or recommendations, please call us at (763) 502- 9945. Geo Engineering Consultants, Inc. Ahsanur R. Siddique, P.E. Steven J. Olson, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer Geotechnical Engineer 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date $/9/2012 Registration No. 22 GeO Engineering Consultants Inc EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY FOR. legend GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES —Sbl— Servlery 3..., 0 569'44 4'47'E ✓ 136 P T cw 4— Tree owp,m cws .9m.o .ayvr�n umb9 soot [N.ptbn Teo of woI [b.elbn To cpe [wetbn Cl) . - .� �llti+• .9m.mc o or SCALE: 1 INCH a 10 FEET x-900— [.Inky cpntw, U _t n i\ n r- i v I I n E. v i I '' oweu. Yen uewm.pl re B-3 MAL r9w.n .o9n c Y . ta..t9e sn. rT /.em . •o.e rt. �, nrclrvnus slrY¢[: •Yoe . w.e n. �-_ r ______Y,_______ mwe 9.•9oz 54 rL ' ____ ---- -- _ •F� tom - 9,uG: se. n. re.. -9ne:i q$ 0 ovru.9a riw�r. ew a.e n. rwxl keTre.w94 ot.wla 'X� _ for or r Y w rwmir -ii n. ie `r "O � yOeL py.� r� spy ° wlorrxrr b1 oar pen p 1. 8bn 9. MM Yeel of a pIw rvrvNy p rynl mqM Imm w Np{n �ru a Sectin t9, iwrvec M. Ymye 3e � S rr � eta9.n rmn.xe [ ww a pbbpu a 1y r.t rel rrvm tM Nwweel cwn., rt, a to t. abpe 3, ucmYy mp9pv wn el wppw pnm. car TpIMCE r[LIOS ryrYwwl CwaY, ulmewy. azNCrpw[: 1 4- . • I �Z. •`� I 1 4 t 9vtilery YmMeb [a:ne /699 en Center9ti s 1 e am Gm T.mpp.. nwotbn . e9eae. I I I I 1 � m I I I 1 I I rOTf: Np Swrtn rpe wpa ror MY Cpumenu I di I p\ — rsw> I I I •� I 1 xnbn a m ulJ9ee .noon ore rrom pbne — u w pary eemp ero en I I Iwo . pnpon. c Iluty be pleb a ro I rw a.ep bcpbn p•ren mine mr ucpvtb..1e0 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I .rely c.rGry w meY aw. w report . pepw.e eY L.— ..9m.mo wd a .w seula 136.53 PLAT 0 44.471`/ tam selwYw w m. rr nn..oel�aw . w. 91w1wx INID Sum—, wc. OLF TERRACE wpoerow 4 Brown• Y.LS, UN YEG 15330 map. Ear SOIL BORING LOCATION IT BROWN LAND SURVEYING. INC. Ge0 Engineering Consultants Inc TEST BORING LOG NO. B -1 Project No. 012 - 0012 -5424 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECTIENGINEER Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. SITE 4710 Golf Terrace PROJECT Edina, Minnesota Proposed House Hennepin County SAMPLES TESTS 0 PID: 19- 028 -24-22 -0008 T28N -R24W -819 0 - o! r 6' north 8 2' west of NE house corner v w > Z Z ADDfTIONAL = w ? 0 _ rn w DATA/ REMARKS 0 m Rw 0 Surface Elev.: 898.5 ft. Datum: MSL o m z ?? 2 o a a 1,0 FILL - Mixture of organic clay, silty clay, black 897,5 1 26/48 to brown 2 54% FILL - Mostly silty sand with little gravel, moist, fine to medium grained, brown 5 5.0 893.5 5 4 2 24/48 50% ORGANIC SILT (OH), boglime, very soft, light 7.0 gray 891.5 WOH PEAT (PT), fibric, very soft, tan �..� �. 3 24/48 1 50% 11.0 887.5 2 FAT CLAY (CL), soft, gray 4 48/48 6 100% 15.0 883.5 15 9 PEAT (PT), fibric peat with fat clay, soft, gray — 17.0 881.5 , 9 FAT CLAY CH), firm, gray 12 20 12 11 25 12 28.0 870.5 13 End of boring WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS STARTED 4/28/121 FINISHED 4/28/12 DATE TIME HOLE CASING CAVE -IN WATER NOTE METHOD: Dynamic penetration testing from 0 to DEPTH DEPTH LEVEL 28 feet. Dual tube sampling from 0 to 16 feet. 4/28/12 09:25 28.0 None 4.7 None 4/28112 09:55 16.0 None 4.8 None EAST NORTH DRILL CO. Geo Eng DRILL RIG 54 DT DRILLER SO ASST DRILLER AS Ge0 Engineering Consultants Inc G @O Engineering Consultants Inc TEST BORING LOG NO. B -2 Project No. 012 -0012 -5424 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECTIENGINEER Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. SITE 4710 Golf Terrace PROJECT Edina, Minnesota Proposed House Hennepin County SAMPLES TESTS PID: 19- 028 -24 -22 -0008 °w T28N- R24W -S19 OJ 0 10' south & 4' west of SW house corner F- ►- z> ui rn ADDITIONAL v LL w w o ? O of z w DATA/ REMARKS a F- 3 oW oLL w Surface Elev.: 900.5 ft. Datum: MSL o m O zz a ? ? o a. CY FILL - Mixture of lean Gay, sand, dark brown 1 25/48 2.0 898.5 3 52% FILL - Mostly sand with little gravel, moist, fine to medium grained, brown 12 2 18/48 6.0 894.5 5 13 38% SILTY CLAY (CL -ML) with a little gravel, boglime, very soft, dark brown 9 3 0/48 10.0 890.5 10 1 0% CLAYEY SAND (SC) with a trace of gravel, loose, gray 2 4 38/48 14.0 886.5 5 79% SAND (SP) with a little gravel, fine to medium grained, moist, medium dense, brown 15 26 26 20.0 880.5 .':.:;:. 20 21 End of boring WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS STARTED 4/28/121 FINISHED 4/28/12 DATE TIME HOLE DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE -IN WATER LEVEL NOTE METHOD: Dynamic penetration testing from 0 to 20 feet. Dual tube sampling from 0 to 16 feet. 4/28/12 11:05 20.0 None 5.0 None 4/28/12 12:05 16.0 None 15.6 None EAST NORTH DRILL CO. Geo Eng DRILL RIG 54 DT DRILLER SO ASST DRILLER G @O Engineering Consultants Inc raeO Engineering Consultants Inc TEST BORING LOG NO. B -3 Project No. 012 - 0012 -5424 Sheet 1 of 1 CLIENT ARCHITECT /ENGINEER Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. SITE 4710 Golf Terrace PROJECT Edina, Minnesota Proposed House Hennepin County SAMPLES TESTS a PID: 19- 028 -24 -22 -0008 T28N- R24W -S19 0 X _ �: 20' north & 3' east of NE house corner _j > ui U ADDITIONAL k? u LL Q w o ix Z DATA/ _ a. = U w U w REMARKS a. 0 M a oa >- u. w Surface Elev.: 897.7 ft. Datum: MSL 0 o m z ?? M o a Cy FILL - Mixture of silty Gay, silty sand, black to 1 27/48 brown 4 56% 3.0 894.7 6 2 13/48 4.0 ORGANIC LEAN CLAY (OL), very soft, black 893.7 = PEAT (PT), fibric, very soft, tan � 5 WOH 27% WOH 3 24/48 2 50% 11.0 886.7 — 10 5 FAT CLAY (CL), silt, soft, gray 4 48/48 7 100% 15.0 882.7 15 7 PEAT (PT), fibric peat with fat day, soft, gray 17.0 880.7' �` —'� 9 5 48148 100% FAT CLAY CH), silt, firm, gray 10 20 11 13 25 14 28.0 869.7 15 SILTY SAND (SM) with a little gravel, layers of fat day, medium grained, wet, medium dense :.: 16 to dense, gray 30— 20 21 35- 30 25 40.0 857.7 40 28 End of boring WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS STARTED 7/14/121 FINISHED 7/14/12 DATE TIME HOLE CASING CAVE -IN WATER NOTE METHOD: Dynamic penetration testing from 0 to DEPTH DEPTH LEVEL 40 feet. Dual tube sampling from 0 to 20 feet. 7/14112 09:31 40.0 None 4.8 None 7/14/12 10:20 20.0 None 16.0 None EAST NORTH 7/20/12 12:45 14.2 14.2 14.2 5.7 3 DRILL CO. Geo Eng DRILL RIG gA 7/29/12 18:00 14.2 14.2 14.2 5.4 1? DRILLER SO ASST DRILLER raeO Engineering Consultants Inc TYPICAL EXTERIOR DRAINTILE SYSTEM FOUNDATION WALL FLOOR SLAB DRAINTILE COMPETENT SOILS COMPACTED CLAY CAP MINIMUM THICKNESS: 12 INCHES SLOPE DOWNWARD FROM WALL SLOPE SATISFYING OSHA REQUIREMENTS FREE DRAINING BACKFILL FILTER FABRIC 3/8" PEA ROCK OR CLEAN STONE NOT TO SCALE .� v', e,c i s�; r� _ o,,�- �! 7 6 u 1 F Te`vc•c / V eA,v f�l Vol L f� �'S N i C G S'/C- C �c1 t 11 1 "' i S' C= c-f -7 !w G o l F fiC'I -rte 2 `q'` (ZeAt- v `, e w Lt -7f C? � c) li-�- 7- e4 -;r-Gc c �C F—Mvt-q • %�, � "`' ,�:��.!•Y ��:,,,,��r�q;�� � ary;,� ui _�3 ::��� :� f.�j ,�-r 'is>. �� "`?;' � st �; y�'tr -•n. y. s.;.sxr� ?..,,. -.:,.4 �. �.. ��•�.r bvzc Sar'.",s.•.,„'s,.. *,� ti �,�.'�� •,� X..; t � .,.,='t � F1., � "Y�;, v.;. .. ��f J ,r „L ''- �;�w�y �7,'fia].3C � �� >yna a,;s Y` :�r, : p; r r ie { ?, W #`n.: T>t•i: >'- F.hNd �� -'t +r -5r'x r s . ti.z: ti - .. e -s`.r, �.r<��. xx> :�;H !-E ,�,..•. '�.c'k;:. r w - .�;_, .t � ; _t..,. ,, ., �.,, '. '�':' �.•• 5 ,�,n d a -`h'� •S?Yr3b'Y'l.: ii, .v`G',•, , .. �.:�::. ..n- y � r � E � p q x` -1 r. r ��k� a,. :4�, -:r .... �:7: a:rS t �.. r {t. � � „h. � ut'�`J�.TMrs �- yx1C.•r'.:�5� sC.,^c.i� .. w, '{ _..a; �. a6 �z a� , :fiv � �. z � d<x..H Sr. ,,� . ., ,, _, , �' ,.., F 2 ,+^ , + ; r ,••3ua -,, �,,.,a .,. r.. s�, r� y,�`n :a. ...:� � . re q, ,:r- i',�w =�Z.�' •r .. -'� ,.._. ,.. ... a :.;. �r�,i�..:z.c r: <i � � r�r.,r L �y .. .. l ,r. Y '• �- yLp ''f; \.. (1.� � s �`� t ! +.*.t - -.>'.r }��rf - w� }l�L b �Ss � tM1� ,/ `T� } C '. TS'.. . a. -A � n�.:ra _ - _ ss a. +r � fi , "'� �`ir� ,.. �, � '�•C '��a: ? s � .r ,, p r t _ ::,:; �stv,;:;' -_.,:' '.. �h �. v. "�• .:a::S'f:?' � _. 7"+. r '-�FT ':.� d'''am. -;'cf ,� r �. �i.h , "r,'+'"� s.. ,;�. n. .L a.�", yrY� [,'�,�,y t,,__ -1 }., t �tyi - ,.: ,15 { ttf'.. aJ l .,„1• t... �, 5 N y)M<': a`F. ,A.'. H mac*' :�) K'." a'+'.r,t4 •`Y2 , . ,�" ri X 31 >< 'a ,s T , " 0, yet a L 3` f S £ s.y 5 5 � { { yam,. a iii _ �•+ f�- ply- �,7RA;4 ..� �.4 d+ Y 7 a: Fr HO xli, t �s' ¢ 5 t:. looks A e.7 t {SF 6 ,1 E4, y*f, R. VY Ri op, IA r-h -1 KE M 151 pE il �Js '! � �I IN Z,:7: 1"Z7 MAE, t' y ;X V, 4 IN, wj el - yS e: Z Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 1 Parcel 19- 028 -24 -22 -0008 A -T -B: Abstract Map Scale: 1" = 100 ft. N ID: Print Date: 8/28/2012 Owner P F Commers & K B Commers Market $849,600 06N w Name: Total: R %/+'� / rY/ Parcel 4710 Golf Ter Tax $12,500.44 r 8 �p1z Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: (Payable: 2012) Property Sale Type: Residential Price: p This map is a compila'616 of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.42 acres Sale Area: 18,387 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2012 i A Thirk Green! http: / /gis.co.hennepin.mn.us /Property /print/default.aspx ?C = 4726... 8/28/2012 i Cary Teaaue From: Joni Bennett <jonibennett12 @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 4:12 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Re: Work Session with Planning Commission - questions Cary, Please copy this one for the Work Session. Thank you - Joni On Sep 4, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Cary Teague wrote: Joni, We have not yet heard back from staff. However, from what we have pulled off their websites, Minneapolis still has a 5 foot side yard setback requirement for each side; and SLP side yard setback for small lots is 7 feet for living space and 5 feet for a garage. Cary Teague, Community Development Director <ima e001. If> 952 -826 -04601 Fax 952 -826 -03891 Cell 952- 826 -0236 g g deague(WEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Cary Teague Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 20121:50 PM To: Joni Bennett (ioni ben nettl2(abcomcast.net) Cc: Scott Neal Subject: Work Session with Planning Commission - questions Hi Joni, See our responses below. We are still waiting to hear from SLP and Mpls, regarding.their side yard setback regulations. Good Morning, Cary - Thank you for the packet materials. The information is helpful.- I had never before seen the 2005 Edina Single Family Residential Subdivision Study. I have some questions about the packet materials, and hope you can have some additional information available at the Work Session. First, the 2005 Study appears to address only the creation through subdivision of new lots greater than 75 feet in width and 9,000 square feet in area, not the creation of new sub - minimum lots. Is that correct? I was only made aware of this study,last week. Yes, the study focuses on lots greater than 75 feet in width and 9,000 square feet in area. Second, the packet includes 16 maps depicting blocks with lots wider than the minimum code requirement of 75 feet. The maps state the widths of those lots. However, with just three exceptions, the maps do not depict the widths of adjacent lots or other lots on the same block. The three maps that state the widths of other lots do so only for two 50 foot lots per map. In light of proposals to base required lot dimensions on median lot dimensions within a defined area, or use PUD in R -1 zoning districts, why wasn't more information provided about the dimensions of other lots? More importantly, I would appreciate the following information at the Work Session — The Planning Commission asked me to give them a rough estimate of the number of oversized lots that had the potential to be requested for a subdivision (100 -foot wide lots); similar to the requests we have seen in the Pamela Park Area. These maps simply showed lots with that potential. There are roughly 100 lots with a potential to subdivide. They are generally double the size of the adjacent lots. The Commission was not looking for detail, just a rough number of lots that had the potential to request a subdivision. a. Maps that show the widths of all lots depicted; See attached half section maps that show lot sizes. These maps have greater detail in the lot dimensions. b. Maps that show the properties that would be used to calculate the median lot dimensions or, for PUD, the percentage increases that would be allowed by the proposed ordinance. In other words, please show what properties existing code and proposed amendments would include in calculations of allowable lot and new home size; and In determining the median lot dimensions, all R -1 properties within 500 feet are included, with the exception of churches, golf courses and parkland. The medians change on a lot to lot basis throughout the City, as the individual lot sizes change with each lot. c. If the maps in the packet are to be used for discussion, please identify the distances shown, in feet, from the greater - than- minimum width lots to the most distant properties depicted. Again, the maps are simply to be used to determine a rough number of lots with a potential to request a subdivision, similar to the requests we have seen in the Pamela Park area. See attached half section maps that provide a bit more detail on lot sizes. Third, the packet includes an unattributed document on the topic of allowing subdivision to create sub - minimum lots (dated January 25, 2012 as both "Date Introduced" and "Date of Discussion "). The document states in part "As Planning Commission is aware, we spent over a year considering changes to address the massing issue. When compared to other similar cities, we have some of the toughest regulations on developmenfon smaller lots." I found in my files a "Survey of Cities" that you, gave to the City Council during those massing discussions. It charts single dwelling unit zoning regulations for the cities of Apple Valley, Blaine, Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Lakeville, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, New Brighton, Plymouth, St. Louis Park, Wayzata and Woodbury. The "Survey of Cities" confirms the 2005 Study statement that many cities have "multiple residential zones." Eleven.of the 16 cities surveyed have more than one single -unit residential zone. Bloomington, Eagan and St. Louis Park each have two zones; Apple Valley, Blaine, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Maple Grove, Plymouth and Wayzata each have three zones; and Lakeville has four zones. A far smaller number of the cities surveyed - only four - permit single -unit residential lots of less than 9,000 square feet in any zone, and all of those cities require greater side yard setbacks than Edina does on smaller lots. Eagan allows lots of 8,000 square feet in its R -1S district. Lot coverage is limited to 25% and the minimum side yard setback is six feet, with five feet required for a detached garage. This compares to 30% lot coverage in Edina, with a minimum side yard setback of five feet (three feet for a detached garage). Hopkins has two smaller -lot zones. R -1A requires a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet and R -1B requires a minimum lot area of 8,000 square feet. Both zones require side yard setbacks of eight feet. Plymouth allows lots of at least 7,000 square feet in. its RSF -3 district. The minimum side yard_ setback is eight feet (six feet for a detached garage). St. Louis Park requires a minimum lot area of 7,200 square feet in its R -2 zoning district. The required side yard setback is seven feet on one side of the house, five feet on the other, and two feet for a detached garage. The wider setback on one side of the home may relate to St. Louis Park code on location of driveways and garages. Is the information from your "Survey of Cities" still accurate? If not, I would appreciate very much knowing what information has changed since you provided it to the Council. Staff believes the survey is still accurate. Per your request, we have calls into St. Louis Park and Minneapolis staff regarding their side yard setback regulations. I will let you know when we get the information. Thank you in advance for your help - Joni jonibennettl2 @comcast.net 952 - 927 -0661 Cary Teague, Community Development Director <ima e001. if> 952 -826 -0460 I Fax 952 -826 -0389 I Cell 952- 826 -0236 g g cteague EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning :..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business 3 Cary Teague From: Joni Bennett <joni ben nett12 @comcast.net > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 4:12 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Re: Work Session with Planning Commission - questions Cary, Please copy this one for the Work Session. Thank you - Joni On Sep 4, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Cary Teague wrote: Joni, We have not yet heard back from staff. However, from what we have pulled off their websites, Minneapolis still has a 5 foot side yard setback requirement for each side; and SLP side yard setback for small lots is 7 feet for living space and 5 feet for a garage. Cary Teague, Community Development Director <ima e001. If> 952- 826 -0460 1 Fax 952 -826 -03891 Cell 952- 826 -0236 g g cteagueAEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Cary Teague Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 1:50 PM To: Joni Bennett (ioniben nett12@comcast. net) Cc: Scott Neal Subject:. Work Session with Planning Commission - questions Hi Joni, See our responses below. We are still waiting to hear from SLIP and Mpls, regarding their side yard setback regulations. Good Morning, Cary - Thank you for the packet materials. The information is helpful._ I had never before seen.the 2005 Edina Single Family Residential Subdivision Study. 1 have some questions about the packet materials, and hope you can have some additional information available at the Work Session. First, the 2005 Study appears to address only the creation through subdivision of new lots greater than 75 feet in width and 9,000 square feet in area, not the creation of new sub - minimum lots. Is that correct? I was only made aware of this study last week. Yes, the study focuses on lots greater than 75 feet in width and 9,000 square feet in area. 1 Second, the packet includes 16 maps depicting blocks with lots wider than the minimum code requirement of 75 feet. The maps state the widths of those lots. However, with just three exceptions, the maps do not depict the widths of adjacent lots or other lots on the same block. The three maps that state the widths of other lots do so only for two 50 foot lots per map. In light of proposals to base required lot dimensions on median lot dimensions within a defined area, or use PUD in R -1 zoning districts, why wasn't more information provided about the dimensions of other lots? More importantly, I would appreciate the following information at the Work Session — The Planning Commission asked me to give them a rough estimate of the number of oversized lots that had the potential to be requested for a subdivision (100 -foot wide lots); similar to the requests we have seen in the Pamela Park Area. These maps simply showed lots with that potential. There are roughly 100 lots with a potential to subdivide. They are generally double the size of the adjacent lots. The Commission was not looking for detail, just a rough number of lots that had the potential to request a subdivision. a. Maps that show the widths of all lots depicted; See attached half section maps that show lot sizes. These maps have greater detail in the lot dimensions. b. Maps that show the properties that would be used to calculate the median lot dimensions or, for PUD, the percentage increases that would be allowed by the proposed ordinance. In other words, please show what properties existing code and proposed amendments would include in calculations of allowable lot and new home size; and In determining the median lot dimensions, all R -1 properties within 500 feet are included, with the exception of churches, golf courses and parkland. The medians change on a lot to lot basis throughout the City, as the individual lot sizes change with each lot. c. If the maps in the packet are to be used for discussion, please identify the distances shown, in feet, from the greater - than- minimum width lots to the most distant properties depicted. Again, the maps are simply to be used to determine a rough number of lots with a potential to request a subdivision, similar to the requests we have seen in the Pamela Park area. See attached half section maps that provide a bit more detail on lot sizes. Third, the packet includes an unattributed document on the topic of allowing subdivision to create sub - minimum lots (dated January 25, 2012 as both "Date Introduced" and "Date of Discussion "). The document states in part "As Planning Commission is aware, we spent over a year considering changes to address the massing issue. When compared to other similar cities, we have some of the toughest regulations on development on smaller lots." I found in my files a "Survey of Cities" that you gave to the City Council during those massing discussions. It charts single dwelling unit zoning regulations for the cities of Apple Valley, Blaine, Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Lakeville, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, New Brighton, Plymouth, St. Louis Park, Wayzata and Woodbury. The "Survey of Cities" confirms the 2005 Study statement that many cities have "multiple residential zones." Eleven of the 16 cities surveyed have more than one single -unit residential zone. Bloomington, Eagan and St. Louis Park each have two zones; Apple Valley, Blaine, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Maple Grove, Plymouth and Wayzata each have three zones; and Lakeville has four zones. A far smaller number of the cities surveyed - only four - permit single -unit residential lots of less than 9,000 square feet in any zone, and all of those cities require greater side yard setbacks than Edina does on smaller lots. Eagan allows lots of 8,000 square feet in its R -1S district. Lot coverage is limited to 25% and the minimum side yard setback is six feet, with five feet required for a detached garage. This compares to 30% lot coverage in Edina, with a minimum side yard setback of five feet (three feet for a detached garage). Hopkins has two smaller -lot zones. R -1A requires a. minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet and R -113 requires a minimum lot area of 8,000 square feet. Both zones require side yard setbacks of eight feet. Plymouth allows lots of at least 7,000 square feet in its RSF -3 district. The minimum side yard setback is eight feet (six feet for a detached garage). St. Louis Park requires a minimum lot area of 7,200 square feet in its R -2 zoning district. The required side yard setback is seven feet on one side of the house, five feet on the other, and two feet for a detached garage. The wider setback on one side of the home may relate to St. Louis Park code on location of driveways and garages. Is the information from your "Survey of Cities" still accurate? If not, I would appreciate very much knowing what information has changed since you provided it to the Council. Staff believes the survey is still accurate. Per your request, we have calls into St. Louis Park and Minneapolis staff regarding their side yard setback regulations. I will let you know when we get the information. Thank you in advance for your help - Joni jonibennettl2 @comcast.net 952 - 927 -0661 Cary Teague, Community Development Director <ima e001. If> 952 -826 -0460 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 1 Cell 952 -826 -0236 g g cteaguena.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business 3 (3Z) R e yc (33) as B Q 114e) x z 1 3 S.1 /2 NE. 114 SEC. 0 7 T. 028 R.24 S • (97J A ( %) 11 131 A ( „2) 2 (134) S (133) S (158) 40TH ST W x ” 7. (24) (99) w (71) B9) 172) (BB) A (87) (74) n (86) a4 (75) nw (B5) D + ✓I (76) 641 (77) (83) T , (34 (3B) ( (82) (7B) Ix) (47) ( (24) (46) ( (25) (95) ( (2fiJ A ( (27) (43) R R� (28) i (411 f f(229) $ N +) 2 2 po) (40) ( (31) (39) Jl9lld/VE$ T T , (34 (3B) ( (J3) tt7i- Ix) (13) (14) (16) (12) € 193) (15) 1 ( +� (13) (161 (94) _ _ _ _ (136) (14) (21) ADM 96 °i W (m3') tss e B ry6 (18) 2 e S a06' (23) �q nil (9n +ss (244) ) a Gti p�' 4) e= (08) ' ^3P1t • CO n.5. • i $ 4� (135) e (2� 9sss>: (3) 2 € 41ST - 1e (112 (1J is 2 5 (2i a �v a (3) 8' 4 v� gg 4:.) m.t 3s h i9e Y '(8) ZQ (5) (129), (7) I6) w9s (147) 9 (110) - (1711) P (112) - (113) - (114) - (115) (116) .31 (tza) - (101) I (2) u � �gC (125) (102) wu .Q (103) (130) (IN) ` O 3 +1 3 $ (, 13� r,• e A Z (132) (106) ((�� L1 w.w v J 4 (+33) (107) _ (122) (123) (109) (106) A A 42ND ST A W .1J) 119,) ? W OBt3 LEtt FfT t t s 39) (4 8 v A _111 .. 131 11) ( �) f126, ' .. • _ S.1 12 NE.1 14 SEC. 07 T.028 R.24 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Thu Jul 11 13:14:29 200 zoo 400 Feet N /NW /7 N /NE /7 N /NW/ S /NW 17 S /NW/ N /SW /7 N /SE /7 N /SW/ s Ligntn/uuarteriz:5ecuon a (4)F tnx+n 42ND ST W (82) 14 cm (1, wvFSN16 a 0 z N 0 0 b 25) W (27) � ,y e (28) ti b (+9) a 47 130) � Fn Z (31) ZE (32) (6) A 161 a A (7) A (8) £ A (34) m) e Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber (tza) - (101) I (2) u � �gC (125) (102) wu .Q (103) (130) (IN) ` O 3 +1 3 $ (, 13� r,• e A Z (132) (106) ((�� L1 w.w v J 4 (+33) (107) _ (122) (123) (109) (106) A A 42ND ST A W .1J) 119,) ? W OBt3 LEtt FfT t t s 39) (4 8 v A _111 .. 131 11) ( �) f126, ' .. • _ S.1 12 NE.1 14 SEC. 07 T.028 R.24 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Thu Jul 11 13:14:29 200 zoo 400 Feet N /NW /7 N /NE /7 N /NW/ S /NW 17 S /NW/ N /SW /7 N /SE /7 N /SW/ s Ligntn/uuarteriz:5ecuon a (4)F tnx+n 42ND ST W (82) 14 cm (1, wvFSN16 a 0 z N 0 0 b 25) W (27) � ,y e (28) ti b (+9) a 47 130) � Fn Z (31) ZE (32) (6) A 161 a A (7) A (8) £ A (34) m) e Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber s Ligntn/uuarteriz:5ecuon a (4)F tnx+n 42ND ST W (82) 14 cm (1, wvFSN16 a 0 z N 0 0 b 25) W (27) � ,y e (28) ti b (+9) a 47 130) � Fn Z (31) ZE (32) (6) A 161 a A (7) A (8) £ A (34) m) e Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber 8 . N.1 /2 Sm E. 1 /4 SEC0 7 T. 08 _ 28 m Ra . 2C 4 4 A F Y s A , ST 1(5) A (]) A (123) (91 (3;' (t 10) (111) (113) (1s 5) 2) (2W 42ND ST W 42ND (20) ) n s (123) W 01) S /MV/ 3) YpO J ? (102) . 4) 03) W ' (121) v 131) 2 DAD e(2) (6) ( 117) F (1a) i (94) :7) °z , (120) posl e) 9) (49) (119) (1 I p) RANT' 41FjyJ.�a (118) 2 (111) rs 0 (106) 0 rLn> x (107) (1s13) 14) 9 2'' ,(84) _ ? 5 08) d (r4) 8 - (39) 8 40 ( ) a (123) W ODD LEN S /MV/ LITTLEST i E;ipc9Cll9iii•X :i N /SW/ (74) (122) (961 (121) v 131) 2 DAD e(2) (6) ( 117) (124) (94) , (120) 1 (109) ,w yr 9) (49) (119) (1 I p) RANT' 41FjyJ.�a (118) 2 (111) rs N /ar +e JDtc (1 tfi) (1s13) (1x15) (114) -6w r S /MV/ LITTLEST i E;ipc9Cll9iii•X :i N /SW/ (74) S/SE 17 (961 am E (90) 131) /11) e(2) (6) ( 117) (1.(1N) (94) , (76) (85) 8 ,w yr 9) (49) - 174) A (]6) (22) (1) (10) +e 9 (82) 2'' ,(84) _ 4 ,( 2) d (r4) 8 - (39) 8 40 ( ) a (41) , 8 a 8 pt B( ,) 84 (85) • B 8 l) B (126), 129 8 (, ) t>D 9 ( ) ,(131) 6 , LZ) n 8 1�i ( 63 ( <]), (95) am n (fi - 8 (I,1 u) ` (74) m ® (30) ® 2 i6) (100) 1851 (73) ' �\' ' (53) (29) S (115) (73) (51) (29) (80) (3) (a5) (96) (87) (a3) as > g g A 8 - a 8 9 6 8 2 ( 01) 1 m>4 m lm ` are I3Bi am - t(12 [ti ^I i]I 1 ^ (8) 5 _ (7B) '` (4) 8 g • 8 to g g (4) B (71) es (521 ss (44) O (6% (46) (8E7 �yi (7l) (55) _ (l� e _ - (113) `1 g - - g 8 _ (37) a . (5) O(d ° 2a ]) (971 (37) (72) (5) (53) e - 199) 8 6 @ (36) (6) (7R) (751 i8) '1981 1,5) 1 (90) , (76) (74) (100) 6 (4 g) 8 (54) (J6) '• s 8 8 i9) 8 8 - - » 7 e 8 (59) 8 (56) a 8 pp 8 (13) (fi) - (112) (]j _ (91) se 8 14 ( I e (36) ¢ (121) (26) J(4 (35) V) (99) (77) (49) (55) (i5) 101 �G1 am fiio (2� (34) xe (101) (118) (92j � (-^ an am � (68) 21 (76) 8 e •J a - 21 (7) g_ B (81) ee a (77) - - (33(33) (14) a 8 W q g >a g e 1e (24) „ (2d) (102) (97) (S7) (O.! (15) ` yfstl (32) m CIO 8 (75) 9 8 8 I) U) z () ( e LZ ��� 8 8 q 2. e -6w r S /MV/ LITTLEST i E;ipc9Cll9iii•X :i N /SW/ (74) S/SE 17 (961 (53) E (90) 131) fi (6) ( 117) n (94) (76) (85) 8 ,w yr 9) (49) - 174) A (]6) (22) (10) +e ,2121 >m alo ,sell Pi pt ]gym >m O 1�i (30) (95) am 8 (I,1 u) ` (74) (30) (11) 2 i6) (100) 1851 (73) ' �\' ' (53) (29) S (115) (73) (51) (29) (96) 1 (�) 2 ( 01) 1 m>4 m lm ` are am „n (1e1)32) B [ti ^I i]I 1 ^ (his 5 8 e - '` ,e 8 g • 8 to g g 1861 ei B (71) es (521 ss (281 le (8E7 �yi (7l) (55) _ (l� e _ - (113) g - - g O 1 _ (27) ° (971 (72) (53) (27) (13) z i8) '1981 1,5) 1 (70) (25) (100) (70) (54) (J6) O i9) 8 - - u .2 •�� g ,s /j d _ �� �1( (59) 8 (56) a (13) - (112) _ _ se 8 _ 14 ( I e (26) (99) (69) (55) (i5) 101 �G1 am fiio (2� xe (101) am am � (-^ an am � (68) (561 (23) (151 B (81) (14) a 8 W q g >a g e 1e (24) „ (2d) (102) (97) (S7) (O.! (15) U) z 9 (90) (66) (58) 6 'a - (22) ' (16) ,> B F u (103) w n (66) 8 (58) (21) La a (95) l (89) (67) I (59) = (21) _ - (1� ,m ON - (� - (04) �� ae (591 B - Ir4 - •- « (l� , 'e (93) (63) (66) (60) (20) B M O e(125))S ° (106) m (105) ` (62) a ® (60) ' S ,a) u(82) ' 8 , Fi4 g se (107) ee _ ae e 8 _ 8 (t0) ) 8 e) 4 (64) (62) (11 ®)e � (17) $ DD P a � (1091 (108) (63) (81) .. (126) MORNINGSIDE 9 9 RD 3 a >o > (79) V, R� (3,m 7) 33) '(132)C (74) (75) 3 (77) (79) (10 O e ,] 69 e e y1 (107) (106) _ a N.1 12 SE.1 14 SEC. 07 T.028 R.24 This is not a legally recorded snap. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Thu Jul 11 13:22:33 20P)"I 200 400 Fee` S /MV /7 S /NE 17 S /MV/ N /SW /7 E;ipc9Cll9iii•X :i N /SW/ S /SW 17 S/SE 17 (961 E (90) s fi YORNING910E CONOONWIUY (85) 8 1841 N (80) (]9) 174) A (]6) CONGO NO 151 (107) (106) _ a N.1 12 SE.1 14 SEC. 07 T.028 R.24 This is not a legally recorded snap. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Thu Jul 11 13:22:33 20P)"I 200 400 Fee` S /MV /7 S /NE 17 S /MV/ N /SW /7 E;ipc9Cll9iii•X :i N /SW/ S /SW 17 S/SE 17 S /SW/ Ligntn/uuarteri5ecuon Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber E (90) YORNING910E CONOONWIUY (85) 8 1841 N (80) (]9) 174) A (]6) CONGO NO 151 Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber (76) r 11; $ (37) IN (55) $ N /SE /18 (38) (22 ° 4 (54) NINE / 19 f39) $ f351 (53) V (23) (40) $ (52) (41) (34) $ (24) (18) $ $ (33) s.3 (25) (4, Is R (32) (47) (26l s ST W $ (soj (44) $ Z (28) m.n (45) . $ s e ` (4fi) 53RD IN (55) $ N /SE /18 (38) $ ° 4 (54) NINE / 19 f39) $ (59) (53) (9i (40) $ (52) (41) 2 (11) $ (12) (18) $ " $ (el) 4 (4, Is (18) (47) ST W $ (soj (44) $ (49) m.n (45) . $ e ` (4fi) (4� (46) U U s .a x M S.1 /2 SE. 114 SEC 18 T. 028 R.24 AA :I,- rM tmr , (721 . n S 4ay (159) (173) (172) (115) (114) _ z N /SE /18 171 � ° 4 a NINE / 19 (58) $ (7J (59) (21) (9i d (69) 9) 2 (11) $ (12) (18) " $ (1�1 (17) (18) (15) ST W (75) N /SE /18 (56) (74) ° (s� l (73) NINE / 19 (58) $ (7J (59) l7+) 5 (79) (69) (62) (68) (67) (6fi) (65) x 54TH ST W z4 t(74) 'l54) ,v.t tat 1.2 tvf 1a2 iaa 5.112 SE. 114 SEC 18 T. 028 R.24 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Thu Jul 11 15:59:14 20Q') 200 400 Feet N /SW /18 N /SE /18 N /SW/ S/SW /181ik S /SW/ N /NW /I NINE / 19 N /NW 17 7 N) Eighth /Quarter /Section � R (108) C (105) G ( ) DDN R x a (57) sn Nwssiasl _ (BB) (58) $ (87) (59) "SOUTH (84) t (62) $ a (67) HARRIET S , (82) (64) 2 $ `� zs (79) (6B) $ (6 8) (A a (7� a (72) 2ND a $ (23) m u (7q 54TH ST W n zz z O U d' N ai 0 ti ro s 'ti V ti ^�1 Q w z w . a I (95) (101J ` 121 Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber 9 6 e 9.� N.112 NE (47) $ (4fi) (ss) S (ssl lea • (sa) 54TH ST W W 7 Q O J $ ,(14) $ iA Ln'ID) w5ID) 3 woe (98) S (71) (58) S (9% (38) $ $ V (59) (31) �5't) (69) Z (6a) X88) (8') (67) S (50) (2� wfie,) ,a6u) (65) 9 (e4) W 7 Q O J F-1 ° a s 55TH ST W a(49) 8 S A A ,v35) (54) S ,a9w) (92) (36) a. e12) (111) S woe (98) S A as,) (52) S (9% (38) $ $ (80) (31) �5't) op X39) X88) (8') (85) (50) (2� (4a) S nF S (49) $ (41) wA.; ,p2i4i' S (Q) $ (4a' (a; (41 ` (3) $ (31 S $ - ,.lt�) S ,(4w (41) - a,44) (45) wa F-1 ° a s 55TH ST W a(49) 8 S A A ,v35) $ ,a9w) (92) ,a7w) (77) a. e12) (111) S woe (98) S $ wo) (99) S (9% (70J 9 $ a6a) g (80) (31) (20) op A X88) (8') (85) (64) S 1(114) S (95) $ ,v35) $ wa.17) w9i, a. e12) (111) S woe (98) S $ wo) (99) ON) w1W) ooa) pm) (31) (20) iv1.u7) S W,afi) t(t1w2) (1e03) (t05) (104, W$ ` _ J W Q 111 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Thu Jul 11 16:03:47 20Q') 200 400 Feet 10 Q O C W .114 SEC. 19 T. 028 R.24 7 w R a 54TH ST W 0 S ,v35) .a�6) 3 (133) w1ID8) (1m30) $ (155) (116) (140) (194) S S (� ('a) (31) (20) S (30) 21) S S (2� (22) 1(130) nF wm; wm; $ $ (147) wA.; ,p2i4i' S (25) (25 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Thu Jul 11 16:03:47 20Q') 200 400 Feet 10 Q O C W .114 SEC. 19 T. 028 R.24 7 w R a 54TH ST W 0 J 9 � w1ID7) mt�) 3 (133) w1ID8) (1m30) $ (155) (116) (140) (194) S (141) $ (132) 4 S (142) (117) (143) O (u1) Z S ,rl d R ,onae (t18) 1(130) nF (146) (fah) $ (147) CCLC'M 45 0 R 9) S (tt) - F (a; (41 $ (31 (2) - 3 - ,.lt�) S - - wr0) (128) _ NO (121) ° lulu]) S (40) (e1) ,1122) (1 (1e3) c28) $ (1251 (6) (124) This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Thu Jul 11 16:03:47 20Q') 200 400 Feet 10 Q O C W .114 SEC. 19 T. 028 R.24 7 w R a 54TH ST W 0 J 9 � w1ID7) mt�) :j:;:;HF,Nk7;t w1ID8) (1m30) $ (155) 10 (95) $ (101) (140) (194) S (141) S (153) - (142) p M1 of (143) O p@ .. " (102 • . v ,rl d R ,onae (Al S $ (149) nF (146) (fah) (147) CCLC'M 45 0 R (tt) - F (a; a nab) - S ° ° (x100) (31 (2) - - - A 6 (42J R - _ NO ° 19 (47) (461 (4s, (40) (e1) (6) (96) (2)e (651 j S• (97) S Iola) S m , x((b& (1') `'•2 ) __ - a p 9 (69) rELM WOOD ) 1°8 1 3 ) 10 fi) S a a wIe() _ p ,N (21309 6z OD 7 ELCt:'(.aD3s9Y ° $ 171 (10 CIO wwt(v ° wwis m y sID . y $ ° 2 `(74� (�t,o� s ) - s s (a) (7Sc ) D�NO O $ ( i (a) ( 7 1- fi (79) g ('08) DEVER y v W (34) e_ (2e) A ^ s2 (16) (111 (ai) pY 9 3 x° Z � a 3co'� w lu) (m $ (26) 112 - (e- a e 4t ° ° a z '-r+1 s R. iv F E (02) $ 9 w1ID7) mt�) :j:;:;HF,Nk7;t w1ID8) (1m30) $ (155) S q i� (31) 8 S (140) (194) S (141) S (153) - (142) p M1 of (143) O p@ .. " (102 • . v ,rl d R ,onae (Al S $ (149) nF (146) (fah) (147) (34) e_ (2e) A ^ s2 (16) (111 (ai) pY 9 3 x° Z � a 3co'� w lu) (m $ (26) 112 - (e- a e 4t ° ° a z '-r+1 s R. iv F E (02) S /SE /18 5 /SW/ A. :j:;:;HF,Nk7;t (13) aPOUrt° 8 "., S q i� (31) 8 S (2B) f° 8 (22) 9 z, c r (87) a - (9<) _ 'E rERRacErr - p M1 of 'S O p@ .. " (102 • . v ,rl d R ,onae (Al S U nF CCLC'M 45 0 R (56) a nab) (52) 04C1'E (103) A8 5ta A 6 (42J R - _ NO ° 19 (47) (461 (4s, (40) (e1) (60) ev 1HRO tw 2 O[\\ F !f (57) n. as Ov a (54) ,a Acnry � � (e1) ap \ v _ - 59) (55) (62) ( ° 56TH s e w Firm vL S a �e a _ iv4q eu lrer 148) N.1 /2 NE. 114 SEC 19 T. 028 R.24 S /SW /I8 S /SE /18 5 /SW/ N N /W /1 :j:;:;HF,Nk7;t N /NW S /NW /19 S / NE/ 19 S /NW/ 7 20 0 Eighth Quarter Section AB k l ° CIR ° (48) ° 3511 , (44) a $ (se) (49) (t3) n / (,e) q °v (A Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. A& ® Aft aaaa Aft eeIM A01he1� IM - �AM Aft eeA� Aft Aft A�Am Am AM Aft Am I \Am AM AM aAsk Alk AMk, AdftkAM ooeoAM ®Afilk Aft Aft Alk Alk AM� Aft AMN� Alk AM� AW. PageNumber N.1 /2 SE. 114 SEC 19 T. 028 A 24 q t p R p p q 16C Fl k A IBC _ _�R` IC 92 ° m (93) (94) (95) (96) (97J (98) (99) (f00J (t01) (102) (103) (f D4) (105) (106) (107) ,a 1�4 m 3 (75) R 0. R 58TH ST W s 58TH ST W A w w3 (]3)f52) 7 W x � (72) m.na (71) x m,n x (53) x (92) R (70) (54) A (6% R (B1) (55) R 14(fi9) (6; 4 R I® (a) A 1(56) (85 R x w3e 2B) w,e (14) l� . x (106) x (ro) A x �nm° (64) rasa (59) A (15) ` (7) x (62) (g'1) R 1 e w w3 1(74) (7% w� tv3 �f® S /SE /19 (3% (12) (92) R (78) �I® (6% (9% (B1) (29) (13) 1(69) (88) 4 R I® (a) A (86) (85 R x w3e 2B) w,e (14) l� . (106) x (ro) poi) A (27) (15) ` (7) I® I® e w w3 1(74) (7% w� tv3 R (94) S /SE /19 (3% (12) (92) R (78) 7. (9,) (6% (9% (B1) (29) (13) 1(69) (88) 4 R leis (a) A (86) (85 R x w3e 2B) w,e (14) posl A . (106) x (ro) poi) A (27) (15) ` (7) y 5 x A lti (zo) ma e 1 (tae , (4) e (18) 3 (21) ,nrs • s e l a t (22) �8 (471 Q l (2„ $ (67) „ s 59TH ST W A A (12D) S /NE /19 1(97) M) x 1(74) (7% A (95) R (7; R (94) S /SE /19 (93) R 1(77) pB) (92) R (78) 7. (9,) (6% (9% (B1) p (62) A 1(69) (88) 4 R leis (a) A (86) (85 R (12D) S /NE /19 S /NW/ ('19) 1(98) 1-2 pie) S /SE /19 1(99) Poo) It R (117) (101) R (1 16) (10) p) (102) R (115) p (103) A (114) (f3) (1>) 4 Ey ] A (113) (too) x (1ie) posl A w(f 11) (106) x (ro) poi) R (109) (1o8) A s (1z4) 21)m (122) e e A ,0 ° 1 A e A „ e x u m` i x A is m A A u A S1 „ A s R 60TH ST W (J0) 21 n e <5�1 3 f29) (n ? R x , N.1 /2 SE.1 /4 SEC.19 T.028 R.24 This is not a legally recordd map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Fri Jul 12 08:38:15 200 200 400 Feet S /NW /19 S /NE /19 S /NW/ N /SW /19::::: N /SW/ S /SW /19 S /SE /19 S /SW/ (, 0 0 Eighth /Quarter /Section 41 (61) (80) (19) p6) - p7) (76) F sou HWO n (6) (15) st PageNumber rrr� °+errerr�rPrr���r�����1 p4) (10) p) p (f3) (1>) 4 Ey (12) LA G y 5 A lti (zo) ma e 1 ( 3 (21) ,nrs • s e l a t (22) �8 (471 Q l DO Z) $ (67) p (2 <i � (31) { 4 r— (3A �7 3 (2 1 9 H ' (44) (50) e �b 21 p s (33) 2 (26) (34) p9) --' m O p O t< (75) (42) a .� (92) 0 9 e tm (ze) - (4'1) 8 (57) ,m A x (3% l6 39s (56) 4 (4) O)2 Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber rrr� °+errerr�rPrr���r�����1 N.1 /2 S'W 114 SEC. 20 T.028 A24 R (133) (1341 p ^ n (67) (]2) d ^ ^9 (132) (13s) d ° (68) (73) (130) (126) 4 a a (3) p - (131) (129) ' (]O) (11) 4 a ,s3 7 a' (124) (127) - (]S) 7 (� ^s p (125) (126J (77) - (78) a 2 45) 8 (I Ifi) (118) (]9) (80) (tt ]) A (118) (B I) (B2) 8 N d (122) M1 (B3) (120) fA (123) (121) Q 7 W Q U ppyy I'1 3 (90) (87) y W q p IJ (11 s) (89) (88) y& u.is 9 (114) , )0) - (136) 9 A m (113) a ¢ 9 d (97) a cn 9 i (171) O ! (st0 1:i (� (112) 0 r J q y (95) •e (96) a m 0 6 LU S z o® ) (t 111 (138) �° TA (98) (104) NU m U (110) ras (108) A •i �' (97) (100) 53) a m i (109) (107) 2 ' (101) (102) • p • � �. (105) (65) S A R (y) a (62) >S (61) (60) (59) (58) (51) (� (56) (5]) (52) (54) (51) (so) e (49) (48) (47) (46) (45) (44) (43) R (42) (40) _ on (37) (38) (339) (3fi) (147) (142) ROY H. Pt (146) RSOMS� (143) 2 8M14 FIRST SAS n ^ (fi) d (s> 0 (7) y (8) (13) (11) g y (14) V) (19) z y (22) U y (21) f ^ (24) _ 1 y (25) (28) m : (139) 1Ww (140) :)N ^ (141) 6. (1) - (2) a� G (7) (4) (10) p (12) e ft� (16) (20) Q C (23) S W $ (27) (26) $ (29) S (30) Z $ (32) ° (33) 7 (34) $ p (35) ^ S S a (92 ) S (72) S (91) S (73) $ (90) S (136) (74) $ (89) a (49) S $ 8; (27) (41) A 7(228) a / S p (29) (76) $ 1. (667 a $ (B� wm� (79) (85 S (80) R le4) S (81) (83) a 12 (82) (20) Q C (23) S W $ (27) (26) $ (29) S (30) Z $ (32) ° (33) 7 (34) $ p (35) ^ (115) S S (7% 1..11 S (4 $ (197) S S (69) S (136) (48) (68) a (49) S (118) nl1 (27) (41) A 7(228) a (50) S S p (29) 6 S (667 a (sl) wm� $ A S (72) nws Al $ 3 (53) a o W 0.l A S Is5) a (fit) (110) n.y (g6) na S Q (1321 (121) S nY SECOND (709) (1001 (115) S S (94) S ; $ (197) (tie) S (114) 6 S (95) S (136) (117) a 11 3) (1 nn (96) S nas S (1351 nA (118) nl1 (27) (41) $ 7(228) a (112) nom S p (29) (39) S a (30) S (38) S $ (31) S (3>) S S (72) nws it 5 (98) ma a o W 0.l 09�) ,n,s 6 (170) ns (110) n.y (g6) na S Q (1321 (121) S nY SECOND (709) (1001 (1371) 022) S (130), • s S (108) 1� (184) ss S (129) (123) 1 S q r (107) 9(106) 9(105) 9(104) 9 (103) 58TH ST W S /NE /20 (46) �'^ S (23) $ A (128) g021) 6 (126) 6(125) 9 (124) W 58TH ST W S /NE /20 (46) �'^ S (23) $ (4; S (139) S (22 ) $ ( /1j R (25) (43) S (26) (42) S (27) (41) $ 7(228) a (40) S p (29) (39) S a (30) S (38) S $ (31) S (3>) S S (72) 36) $ (33) (35 ts) (34) 59TH ST W S /NE /20 (160) S S ^ 1179) i;i;'L1iS�+•F,., (769) S (139) S I S /SW /20 (158) S (140) S a (IB) am Q (156) S 7 (1:2) 1 -1 311 p 9 11 (61 (81 A A A A W Q (22) S /NE /20 (1) (j,) S i;i;'L1iS�+•F,., t (20) S I S /SW /20 C-0 1,91 a (IB) am R` (4) MANOR $ (,n) $ (7) (t21 ts) (1113) S (182) a (I B1) S (180) �s. m (1191 1 A (98 (96 (9 (9x (92 (9. N (BE NO (Bi MA N W 0: 112 (12 Z (155) S S, (143) S O (1781 S (lfi - 6) � n.. ADDN " n� nH o a (191) a (144) 1 (177) (16'7) n nm a (153) R (145) (176) S 3 (168) S O (Ill (152) I1<6) (175) (169) (11: A -(11 (151) 6(150) 6(149) 6 (143) 6 (147) = (1]4) 9 (173) 6 (172) (17t) 6 (170) R r - (11 _ 60TH ST W F 60TH ST W a$ a$ >:'° ■ m m ^m n ^ 7(24)-- (8) _ - ' ° s (36) r S - -' r, 3 R) t 1 - - 3 - "•s (23) (14) 4y - - "4, m , (,10a , 1) S ^ 11s v 0 .. � •a >s s p ( ,;;3) e ( (r45- (A) (3S� (13) S .4, m S rnm n .. Ne 1/2 SW.1 14 SEC 20 T. 028 R.24 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Tue Aug 06 11:37:20 2r4l'3 200 400 Feet S /NE /19 S /NE /20 S /NE/ N /SE /19 i;i;'L1iS�+•F,., N /SE/ S /SE /19 I S /SW /20 S /SE/2 0 Ligntn /marter /section Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber : ! �. �'c �. l; !. !, !: !, !, !3 l4 :� 11 �, �. ! �1 � � �► � � dFA +•► to Ap, ® dm� Am m, Aok A+ dll� A& A a10� 'M /a. ® 'M A ®® AM AMI Ah Ah AM, All' ` 'M 'M v a� *� l© +� `G7 +4.V tJ �➢ -J `a� Ill ' j v3 j i '14 Is Is A „I tl l .I .a I I I I 4�w 'cr 'ems '(1 `t7 I N q1 `l1 'e1 E ?) '41 Ap `& VO �& `& �& � j l j 'j j j 9 5.112 SW.1 /4 SEC_ .20 T. 028 R.24 (les) 2 FIRST A DN ra = la rr (103) (99) (145) a m a A_ ( +0]) LI (1081 R(106) R(104J 103 = I+) x(11] k 1 ) '(129 ) - 1126) A1125) !J (124) Fl N (151) �I150) F(14' 149 A 'I A d n 4r ( 1 - (173) 1112) (171) (170) t 8 °' O ( ) _ (149) - (147) _ 174 B W a 34 60TH a m 4r m 1 - aII nII 9 ST W 60TH ST W 1a 8 C ° (3 6) ( °3 3) 6 (13) 12) (23) IZ (14) ^ S (35) (24) (131 (109) (103) (37) aaz w.a wax w.a tn.m Iw.a 172) - (,30) a a S e �) _ to Aa ws;r rvsr ^ LOKEN' (29 1) a - a a (sal (52 .)a (42) m '� (34) a a (11 R1 1129) ADDN V,(el) a^ (12J lz4 (1 G R-ac r a m (ro27 Q Q .ry, LOKErtS + ®e+ rs 1' 2 (fa) $ z ^ (3i) m ' a wn s (49) pq 112 1577 5 ®(zsJ (ISJ p96) (1n1) ' axe 8) to 145n 4r6 (38) (9' A (2p) 13; "a '0' ,a (107) + a (3g) S (37) 1 +w a v \ O (, 00) (75) e• (40) pr� (31) q+,�. (2e) a © was v , a r " {'• to +a �1 % (1� O (1 � '(A ,(]6) 4 tva, ; over l (301 (29) e a . 2 ,xas i,v.va (7) (1F (90J (]�) W a i _"`.,^ ..s v= S'C� w sr�t B (74) ° ^ ,ys^ ® F (+10) (31' c 6 a (86) 1]3) B" (6j) I77 ^ ' a A.110 wa wm '4 (92) SS• to (e4) 93 (B5) Bath , ,a F A e a lel N IR a ) 46) - ( ) awry i m,e ' (92) a. s R s, tv.sa 42 IN) (111) (94) 9 B • a wax w.a 777SSS T n (72) (111) u.rs ` — (9-9 (44) (43) a (33) (72) Y/'7G: SF1S R a R 1V••ti� ar ° w9r wa 6 (2 +1 (119) '3 ; (77) (71) (112) �•' 8 (95) s (78) 1 (4) v 1d 807 (A) L wI ) ] ° 6 (96) ) (2; V (60) ( ) =; (tt3) IN) (81) S f d - Na aw,m " Pa N ' t ,4 > • 3 B e - d PO.v. 6 6' 81 a m � g,m °s`�n (69 70 TjFRR XX 2 (87 (103) ) 4r ] (84) (97) 2 n } ^' v �l tvs� • a + to to r ~— 3 ('0t) Y/'� • (691 (80) (63) (62) _J ° • a 1 9e) F 5 CHOWEN a ° . Q� abw (2°) w w a o w4 0 (fin (eij ,va w TOWN REALM 'S EDINA +n QQ �y O (127) (124) 1100) a " tw s C 3n 'tir 3 4 a i7 i �° « e ¢ " 2 (123) B , (99) 2 s 1040'1' a Sa le ° (447 (25) ry ua.r n ,va - (121) B p ¢. 1 ) "a feel - (871 - " (66) (597 ti 116 :. la wa, TERRACE NDAD N z - B ' o c 4 °ar *P ( ) (91J (89) 9 - n,m � ( ' S azw a, la4, raaazw 9 e ((1100fi5) ) n N GEi " ® z �p�Ittfi) a.a (641 a4 " s d R r4 'a a O ry® ,a Wj V] w o W {� Q 4rcFt � sonv,(w14'S 2cm 0FE ) J Cx4 ((wS1B2v ) 5 ) (60 ) ,w 1�t 5v(122) , s r 1 O 157 .r. 14 (26) n (9) S )YART (65) 00) DIVISI N (47 Q a ti SCHVFDSYS (12 tPR (sl (4 (1) 1897 2z AODN (27) O u (49) r, (61) °a � m In n I I l n _ rase f (4 6v $ ,a e (89) 18611 1 5 N (591eo n a n ADEN ( 1 a (120) �' S (57) () 198) � - 3 s a = . _ � " " n„a. � c r (112) a (114) ------ --- 163) S (eA >b s ^a (4e) 128) I. wv Q "8'� a a (tso) i a a 6 ° x 62ND ST W a. ° a TOWN raE —s - F1RST i (331 �' w.6 6o vevn TEIUtAC6 pa a the ADDN F y.. (1911 c ® 4 ve 3 (43) (4 n aa.0 A eve rw.0 nar TO7R/NR.EALTY7S 6 I This is not a legally recorded map. It represents 5.112 SW.I 14 SEC.20 T.028 R.24 a compilation of information and data from city, N /SE/ 19 N /SW /2 Ni SE/ 0 Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. county and other sources. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. Print Date: Fri Jul 12 09:08:04 200 zoo S /SE /19 ?'lSl:f S /SE/ 400 Feet N /NE /30 N /NW /2 N INE/ 9 Eighth /Quarter /Section PageNumber 12 i a B 8 u (361 . ,n e e g 5,.'9aw .•`N OS xx5ry B �, II.>•E a6 a x ne O A 8 B a . e �R BLA` a g H6) - (s0 - g , •_- _e uP a S x R a - x R (49) (46) (49) . Den eN I� � B B 5, 9, 9 • (2,) (92) ,n K� k R_ (93))p /^� as, tlY'V 0D _ e . B •e B a� ' = - E-7) s _ o In SPRUCE RD N.1 /2 NE. -114 SEC. 30 T.117 R.21 m (et) s N O QZ P4 O U A BELMORE LA r, B 8 S /SW/ (361 . ,n e e g B_ x (43) B B (52) e ® • - I x ne O 8 B a . e (�) [1'7"13 a g H6) - (s0 - g , •_- _e e B (96) (50) - R a - x R (49) (46) (49) (7) (5) SPRUCE RD B 8 S /SW/ (361 . BB S /NW /30 e g B_ x (26) of ' -- A - BR x O e e a . e (�) (26) _ (32) B a • - - (00) (6C) A B (7) (5) SPRUCE RD 7� r wN (d) (86) (2) (,n necuwm.m a d . Un " QQ� (7fi) B 0��5 e (60) = e e (4 )< R RST x st ( g (51) a =O9' Y INTERLACH N In in 7 ~ x B 1 B (62) B (60) E $ 1) / (56) _ F (2?) Q (L (21 ) B N Lh In Q eIPo rg a2 in In H a (23) w ' a 0911 E li * am a (64) 8 a (67) 4,' 6 (58) ' S „•O' (24) 1(12) 0 - ____ in In In ° mm LQ ° x R�$ 1 (62) A (66) - B (69) R (20) (19) MALONEY s AVE a. e wu)4 21 d1 g (� ,'�. a PAFf OF BLOCKr 80 F . ( ) (2) - A• a (51) � e (Ifi) � a - N.1 /2 NE. 114 SEC. 30 T.117 R.21 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Tue Jul 16 15:28:49 20 200 400 Feet S /SW /19 B 8 S /SW/ (361 . BB S /NW /30 (62) B S /NW/ B x O e e a . e (�) 7� r wN (d) (86) (2) (,n necuwm.m a d . Un " QQ� (7fi) B 0��5 e (60) = e e (4 )< R RST x st ( g (51) a =O9' Y INTERLACH N In in 7 ~ x B 1 B (62) B (60) E $ 1) / (56) _ F (2?) Q (L (21 ) B N Lh In Q eIPo rg a2 in In H a (23) w ' a 0911 E li * am a (64) 8 a (67) 4,' 6 (58) ' S „•O' (24) 1(12) 0 - ____ in In In ° mm LQ ° x R�$ 1 (62) A (66) - B (69) R (20) (19) MALONEY s AVE a. e wu)4 21 d1 g (� ,'�. a PAFf OF BLOCKr 80 F . ( ) (2) - A• a (51) � e (Ifi) � a - N.1 /2 NE. 114 SEC. 30 T.117 R.21 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Tue Jul 16 15:28:49 20 200 400 Feet S /SW /19 S /SE /19 S /SW/ N /NW /3 . N /NW S /NW /30 S /NE /30 S /NW/ COUNTRY 9 (5]) CLUB ti �i ti Er M 3A ti Prepared by the City of Edina, NUN. ° Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., N/1N. 29 9 Eighth/Quarter/Section PageNumber 13 N /NE /30 WNW, 41 S.1 /2 NE.1 /4 SEC'. 3 D T.117 A 21 S /NW/ N /SW /30 N /SE /30 WSW/ �J v9i - 8 8 1621 (63) R R R_' ' R R • R R , R v C s Sy€ aeA n h >ceeomLf „fh. Ca swrvEmnvtmrms (4) (47) (48) (49) R (Sy) x H - f89J (32) g t (50) t ' g - } m.,m 8 8 ,,3 s» a •`& ° PART OF BLOCK 21 , e`s; a ne „ „• a m ° m 12 R T 9ry g m n (39) "g g : i F (42) PLt" q (261 a ^ ASCENSION °�' 1 „ , ; , (Bl x 191 _^ ? (13) RGT 0 F BLK 23, o (Jx Irl (w 2 " .1 a x LSS N E.a N, N D N QO ' °l > " g w U7 1 (28) q x (27) AI- g I18) x (32 ) (3, 7 w. ADDN GROSS R1 PLAT d (2e 1) s =g sz l s ' 4A,Dm w MEIV ELSSOHN 1, (s) • ' m E,, a (; g (2; t7 B a ,,,, B e a s � f - � m, a INTERLA HEN v mrr xan LA PE'S SUED OF 1• g J s v, s c - ( +JI e Isol * , , ( ) R " l6� z 1 gesrx m 0— z ,» ° 19 3 , (es) A (z>! ' ¢ ,) _ _ - 145) (<]) (43) '43) (zo) LOTS 8 U 23 g 46) _ - 4 14� � C , (,6) (3a) G, •e (] WCTO 3E WS 23 COUNTRY e WfLLARDS m� w fs4) ae • ,.,.,,,„m ,.. ?• u ,>a 22 m13 .. C� �, wiz a SUBD (isl g u� ., a = •� m (ze) f3o1 B p (sA ,OF (76) F " 4 (26) g g T, (J6) 2 enss " (4;�a ¢ A 4 1631 �/ N 6 F (3; • C (21) (33) LL i BLK17eN HN (56) a (s] ) (ss a > a_ (so) a B (0n B L a (48) N9 00 CLUB ¢r 3 (3; .7 " (2) t., (81) _ (46) C !2 u°e¢, se•oi sE SOx °ee �I ti s WATERMAN AVE nxw� ii • a R m �mw m ¢emro m Km¢w s ,, • o - - e 9] O N „iarE >. VIATERMAN —2. ®.ro s ° WATERMAN _ R AVE ° R M a,vm,4 (9) 0o) (9s) (221 i • `rte. i' Y ° (60) B16 _- A 9 a 1 „1 B 4 B 113) (fA - gas` �.Ai`°6 ' �$ _' Fy (]) L`O (58) �R (3]1 R x R pe) a (39) R r�xo co�inn�row vv�,ni'o.suwE,af6an 'f' � l (4) v t•`1 9V ID�Q d (79) s (78) mex lG H�. ro 1591 (39)'a �^ AD R m a, ��, �� I6�1RROR 4 c ^' xE vi INTERLAC E� �\ (93) ��b @j 4k 3. • T (6) a = R m . `9+� "a,, (4 2) a e PRICE'S SURD OF Bt K 23, �� ,¢,imrE �°MxroFa n.m,°,xx,o•E - t rm mxrE lr.m B L .•+ - (6,J �P 1 + 7 ) 9a S. b.q L (41) s = (49) °.sr,1,. MENDELSSOHN. VAC 7 -23 -36 S F� a? = $� c F ``� ; COUNTRY _ a ” FINK x 1 °8) IB31 ” 8. vx A � 190) "b. a d 'Py R 7 � ¢,ar i to $ *r. %'. w vi (Go) sm +v.whv a � V m r (16) axs wno "T (24)" U . (62) 65 ( 1 v 5 T�91 (16)r, ( 54) a rU n 3 w U Q R4A ``o o ADD W ea q D pfss/ ' � CLUB c 1 „el (f]) 47- '� � i '190 s R (6]) R g d (647 - - �� i $ ;� / / `� � •,4. 'ay Y!.e' s 2 FAT U (e2) a (0) S.112 NE.114 SEC.30 T.117 R.21 Th' t 1 11 d d is is no a ega y recor e map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Tue Jul 16 15:32:45 2000 Zoo 400 Feet N /NW /3 N /NE /30 WNW, S /NW/ N /SW /30 N /SE /30 WSW/ zy Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. v 9 Eighth /Quarter /Section PageNumber 0.4 2 ` (5a �T ( +p) (a5) F 136) (38) ,x(39) `( +1) S /SW /19 S /SE /1 N /NE /25 cc:iEcN;�N?4i3 N /NE/ S /NE /25 S /NW /3 =JIM O •e � ® �I ` (5a �T ( +p) (a5) F 136) (38) ,x(39) `( +1) a 0 ti N.1 /2 NW. 114 SEC. 30 T.117 A21 s = gym; . Fy 2ND ST S mfilu >yu snn m �9 ffS) q W ° (2�`a a ' TROLLEY Z uNF _ 3RD ST 6 _ AODN _w n.� a e n xs (20) (19) ( _ (46) S T (971 (28) a ,,• e • xx (2) ` (+9) (' W) 9 (97 ^.(29) (3') (21) •`t3xx1f e r ) Vv �++ ` ; Q +a a ) ((11a 567 ) • ^(5) ° i^ �.. {<(66Ba +U 5) ) - - e e ° s, ` ( a n xa , _ �f .a - i : m �6° i 1 ) ^ ' „ • � 1 23)+ 1 ) (3) (22) (5 (30) � "'(44' (521 `(32) `•(23) `1 +) 13 (4) (23) 60) 2 . � (1+) ( (< (22) (63) s 6 ) aH s it • .90r �- , (2') _ (161) a nae (95) (3+) 10 1 M (J0) (12) (82) 56) (25) ( l) 11 1B . •� (35) (26i (10J ^(e' _ () x f (94) N EC�� BELMORE PA j S /SW /19 S /SE /1 N /NE /25 cc:iEcN;�N?4i3 N /NE/ S /NE /25 S /NW /3 =JIM a 0 ti N.1 /2 NW. 114 SEC. 30 T.117 A21 s = gym; . Fy 2ND ST S mfilu >yu snn m �9 ffS) q W ° (2�`a a ' TROLLEY Z uNF _ 3RD ST 6 _ AODN _w n.� a e n xs (20) (19) ( _ (46) S T (971 (28) a ,,• e • xx (2) ` (+9) (' W) 9 (97 ^.(29) (3') (21) •`t3xx1f e r ) Vv �++ ` ; Q +a a ) ((11a 567 ) • ^(5) ° i^ �.. {<(66Ba +U 5) ) - - e e ° s, ` ( a n xa , _ �f .a - i : m �6° i 1 ) ^ ' „ • � 1 23)+ 1 ) (3) (22) (5 (30) � "'(44' (521 `(32) `•(23) `1 +) 13 (4) (23) 60) 2 . � (1+) ( (< (22) (63) s 6 ) aH s it • .90r �- , (2') _ (161) a nae (95) (3+) 10 1 M (J0) (12) (82) 56) (25) ( l) 11 1B . •� (35) (26i (10J ^(e' _ () x f (94) N EC�� BELMORE PA j a 11.08 s • e° (12) This is not a legally recorded map. It represents N.1 /2 NW.1 14 SEC.30 T.117 R.21 a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Tue Jul 16 15:39:02 20Q 200 400 Feet S /SW /19 S /SE /1 N /NE /25 cc:iEcN;�N?4i3 N /NE/ S /NE /25 S /NW /3 S /NE/ ��i it cif Ali a 11.08 s • e° (12) This is not a legally recorded map. It represents N.1 /2 NW.1 14 SEC.30 T.117 R.21 a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Tue Jul 16 15:39:02 20Q 200 400 Feet Myn Lniuuarten-jection Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber S /SW /19 S /SE /1 N /NE /25 cc:iEcN;�N?4i3 N /NE/ S /NE /25 S /NW /3 S /NE/ Myn Lniuuarten-jection Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber 32 N.1 /2 SW.1 /4 SEC.19 T.028 R.24 - 3 _______ ____. „ r (2A s (zq I (zat P91 I I +el (1i1 Us)' n A 4 . .c __m__ (29) (28) a (3)1 (36T . x 58TH ST W a (90) d (69) y a (3) m $ (66) (A) R A (65) R (91) ) W(111) (eel (51) A 1(72) (87) (t 13) (73) (86) R SCHOOL DIST R uie (So) A �, (75) (u) R (767 (B3) R' A a (79) . 1181)iv,a (35) (24) Im (80) � C R (93) k F ��)) (22) SCHODLDIST (116) 1(106) Cm r R (t2tJ I eo1 m x OF a ,m Q EDINA a ' �ev4�O St (29) a - (28) 0 (30) (f0]j (95) (1) Iss.s ,sm O + SCHOOL DIST „ (106) .. (2) 4w e r4 raar , ___________________� 0 ;9ee , .. RD ' - -a ____�______________ -- -- - - - - - -- .--- -- a (90) d (69) y a (3) m $ (66) (A) R A (65) R (91) ) W(111) (eel (51) A 1(72) (87) (t 13) (73) (86) R (74) R uie (So) A �, (75) (u) R (767 (B3) R A a (79) . 1181)iv,a (35) (24) Im (80) 9 2. (68) 1(46) 59TH ST W y a (3) m $ (66) (A) R A (65) R (91) a (64) W(111) A 1(4 (51) A ,e R 1(52 R (t 13) (15fi) R m ('10) (92) g A R (So) A e A a 4 c R (56) 1(s7) R mm 3m -NN.• - (27) - (26) (35) (24) Im (109) R (93) k F ��)) (22) SCHODLDIST (116) 1(106) r R (t2tJ I eo1 m x a ,m Q R 2: W �ev4�O St (29) a - (28) 0 (30) (f0]j (95) Iss.s ,sm O + „ (106) .. 4w e r4 raar , ___________________� 0 ;9ee , .. RD ' - -a ____�______________ -- -- - - - - - -- .--- -- a W a (105) °s (9) :P Ia SCHOOL � ___ �•+ °) QUTH CO CQRD D 4DON (51 a R i (104) (98) mer 3 z (20) _ ' a 1 : , a s a R a (13) _ (12) _ (11) _ (10) - (41) (42) (q) (da) (4� la`s (41) (103) R e a a �. r�tiRr ro caR Ns OUTH ONCO D ADi75{ „�, z C) (IS) x R q (16) - (17) 1181 - (19) a (40) 8 (391 F (38) (37) a (36) 8 (35) a (341 a ='3 , R ® la (101) (100) n 2. (68) 1(46) R (67) R (4; $ (66) (A) R A (65) R ' (49) R a (64) 15% A 1(4 (51) A ,e R 1(52 R (t 13) (15fi) R 1 R A R (So) A 55 R 09) (56) (56) 1(s7) R 59TH ST W 7 z7) : S/NE/ a (1 N /SE/ (112) S /SW /19 a R (26) a (a0) R a (126) 6 1128) (t 13) (15fi) R 1 R (30) (125) (31e ) (1`14) m.rs' $ (32) ° (124) usn R (331 A (123) t. F (116) A r e ' r R (t2tJ I e4 R (t19) ' (1t16) „ R a4 A 60TH STI W I n w 4 r e 60TH ST - (29) (4B ) a F - I a ) ( 6] ) (30) n) (6r (80) (65) (56) B N.112 SW. 114 SEC 19 Te 028 R.24 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data fiom city, county and other sources. Print Date: Fri Jul 12 08:30:12 2002 200 400 Fee( N /SW /33 S /NW /11 S/NE/ N /SW /33 ''':''�LyfS,l4Yi, N /SE/ S /SW 133 S /SW /19 S /SE /1 9 9 Eighth /Quarter /Section t� 0 F N 7 N51 (21) C R (4) (23) a 22 R (43J R 3 (24)) R F (42 � R (29) a a (01) f R (26) a (a0) R (27) a y e 5 6 1128) (39) (15fi) (38) (29) $ R (30) 1(37) (36) (31e ) (35) m.rs' $ (32) R '(34) usn R (331 Q w a'') ( ) (35j 9 Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber N O 41 ti w a rrti _J V T) T T) 1"r, If, .T/ T) 1 V T. v Ir V 11'r. 'v T 1 r Tr V V '1 I 't T ,& I 1(149) (170) ^ vs (169) uOwl (151) A ' R 1167) (153) a (tfi6) (15q) ° (165) ° 055) 1x n � R (15fi) (163) R (157) (162) 1(158) (159) R • ('6') (160) a'') ( ) (35j 9 Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber N O 41 ti w a rrti _J V T) T T) 1"r, If, .T/ T) 1 V T. v Ir V 11'r. 'v T 1 r Tr V V '1 I 't T ,& I c S.1 /2 NW. 114 SEC 32 T.117 R.21 This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Print Date: Wed Jul 17 11:02:09 Ago 200 400 Fee` 5.112 NW. 114 SEC 32 T.117 R.21 NINE/31 N /NW /3 N /NE! 7 tigntn/Uuarter /section 24. a� 0�p C CS 7' - !y N �i ti ti N M h ti Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber S 11E /31 J3ta�;;' S /NE/ N /SE 131 N /SW /3 N /SE/ tigntn/Uuarter /section 24. a� 0�p C CS 7' - !y N �i ti ti N M h ti Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. PageNumber :9 v' 3� 7 s P r � 2 C i s f { t ii _ A ,rF -1 s t t� c 3 �.t �S f t # i a ana" r t i iY s ana" r t i iY \`b,eea REPO RPRECOMMEN DAT•ION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.A. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -107 Adopting Preliminary Operating Budget 2013 Tax Levy and ACTION. REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2012 -107 Adopting the Proposed Budget for the City of Edina for Year 2013, and Establishing the Proposed Tax Levy Payable in 2013. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The attached resolution will set the maximum proposed 2013 tax levies of $21,989,994 for the General Fund, $992,072 for the equipment replacement in the Construction Fund, $939,850 for the debt service of the Capital Improvement Plan Bonds Series 2010A (year 12 of City Hall debt service levy), $406,444 for the debt service of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Public Project Revenue Bonds Series 2005A (year 8 of Gymnasium debt service levy), $431,544 for the debt service of the Capital Improvement Plan bonds Series 2007A (year 6 of Fire Station debt service levy), and $1,536,743 for the debt service of the Capital Improvement Plan and Public Project Revenue Bonds (year 5 of the Public Works facility debt service. The total market value based referendum levy would be set at $615,837 (year 17 of the Park and Recreation Referendum 2005A debt service levy). Total of all levies would increase by $664,258 or 2.5 %. The General Fund and equipment levy for the Construction Fund would increase by 1.7% while the debt levy would increase by 7.6 %. The budget summary for the 2013 budget, as approved for the 2012 -2013 Budget at the City Council meeting of December 20, 2011, is also included as a starting point for 2013 budget discussions. The 2.5% increase would be the maximum property tax increase the City could levy, however, expenditures and revenues could change before final budget adoption. ATTACHMENT: Resolution 2012 -107 Proposed 2013 budget from 2012 -2013 budget document RESOLUTION NO. 2012-107 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR YEAR 20131 AND ESTABLISHING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2013 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount as follows: FOR GENERAL FUND $21,989,994 FOR CONSTRUCTION FUND $ 992,072 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS - SERIES 2010A $939,850 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF 14RA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS — SERIES 2005A $ 406,444 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS — SERIES 2007A $ 431,544 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY BONDS $1,536,743 TOTAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY $26,296,647 Section 2: That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount below for the debt levy of the market value based referendum levy and cancelling the portion of the levy not required to produce the amount as follows: GO PARK AND RECREATION BONDS SERIES 1996A/2005A $ 615,837 TOTAL LEVY $26,912,484 Section 3. That the budget for the City of Edina for calendar year 2013, as established in the 2012 — 2013 budget document approved by City Council December 20, 2011 is proposed as follows: TOTAL REVENUES — GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TOTAL EXPENDITURES — GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TOTAL REVENUES — ENTERPRISE FUNDS TOTAL EXPENDITURES — ENTERPRISE FUNDS Approved this 4th day of September 2012. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) $45,824,245 $49,930,662 $40,146,392 $37,244,036 James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 4, 20.12 and as-recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of ----.520. City Clerk 1 2013 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS Braemar Debt General HRA CDBG Police SR Memorial Service Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy '$21,989,994 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,930,418 $ 992,072 $26,912,484 Reductions (113,000) - - - - (113,000) Net tax revenue 21,876 „994 - - 3,930,418 992,072 26,799,484 Tax increments - 3,990,000 - - - - - 3,990,000 Special assessments - - - - - 2,072,269 1,380,052 3,452,321 Franchise fees 714,000 - - - - - - 714,000 Licenses and permits 2,577,500 - - - - - 25,000 2,602,500 Intergovernmental 760,000 - 145,365 104,760 - - 50,000 1,060,125 Charges for services 3,138,244 - - - - - 50,000 3,188,244 Fines and forfeitures 1,034,000 - - 57,821 - - - 1,091,821 Investment income - 169,000 - 600 300 30,000 122,900 322,800 Other revenue 574,000 - - - - - 574,000 Transfers 765,100 - - - - 559,350 250,000 1,574,450 Debt issued - - - - - - 3,451,500 3,451,500 Other financing sources - - - 3,000 - 3,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $31,439,838 $ 4,159,000 $ 145,365 $ 163,181 $ 3,300 $ 6,592,037 $ 6,321,524 $48,824,245 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION General government $ 5,515,850 $ 886,030 $ 145,365 $ - $ - $ - $ 513,600 $ 7,060,845 Public works 6,611,664 3,000,000 - - - - 5,000,000 14,611,664 Public safety 15,380,984 - - 243,654 - - 332,340 15,956,978 Parks & recreation 3,931,340 - - - 25,000 - 650,000 4,606,340 Debt service - - - - - 6,670,685 - 6,670,685 Transfers - 559,350 - 464,800 1,024,150 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $31,439,838 $ 4,445,380 $ 145,365 $ 243,654 $ 25,000 $ 6,670,685 $ 6,960,740 $49,930,662 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $22,006,930 $ 175,030 $ 10,916 $ - $ - $ - $ 90,315 $22,283,191 Contractual services 4,426,067 711,000 134,449 85,574 25,000 - 208,281 5,590,371 Commodities 1,682,529 - - 18,655 - - 25,000 1,726,184 Central services 3,324,312 - - - - - 1,404 3,325,716 Equipment - - - - - - 598,600 598,600 Capital outlay - 3,000,000 - 139,425 - - 5,572,340 8,711,765 Debt service - - - - - 6,670,685 - 6,670,685 Transfers - 559,350 - - 464,800 1,024,150 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $31,439,838 $ 4,445,380 $ 145,365 $ 243,654 $ 25,000 $ 6,670,685 $ 6,960,740 $49,930,662 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ - 1 $ (286,380) $ - $ (80,473) $ (21,700) $ (78,648) $ (639,216) $ (1,106,417) REVENUES AND TRANSFERSIN Operating revenues Intergovernmental Investment income Other revenue Transfers TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERSIN 2013 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS Aquatic Golf Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Center Edlnborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total $16,819,093 $13,600,099 $ 944,000 $ 3,745,050 $ 1,455,400 $ 476,500 $ 1,163,700 $ 758,000 $38,961,842 110,000 - - - - - - - 110,000 98,000 - - 33,250 38,500 169,750 - - 15,000 - - 15,000 100,000 255,000 272,800 215,000 47,000 889,800 $17,027,093 $13,600,099 $ 944,000 $ 3,845,050 $ 1,710,400 $ 764,300 $.1,411,950 $ 843,500 $40146,392 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY FUNCTION Utilities $13,898,203 $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $13,898,203 Liquor - 12,173,699 - - - 12,173,699 Aquatic center - - 889,386 - - - - 889,386 Golf course - - - 3,711,336 - - - 3,711,336 Community activity centers - - - - 1,887,431 683,016 1,602,275 958,590 5,131,312 Transfers 100,000 1,340,100 - - - - 1,440,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,998,203 $13,513,799 $ 889,386 $ 3,711,336 $ 1,887,431 $ 683,016 $ 1,602,275 $ 95B,590 $ 37,244,036 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ - $ 9,836,831 $ 39,200 $ 356,800 $ 1,500 $ 22,000 $ 105,000 $ 17,000 $10,378,331 Personal services 1,725,272 1,441,291 325,400 1,823,446 674,551 254,198 797,479 589,340 7,630,977 Contractual services 7,092,708 494,108 133,400 597,750 579,650 286,750 335,000 140,650 9,660,016 Commodities 1,056,250 65,525 111,050 383,900 87,750 57,000 187,700 102,400 2,051,575 Central services 630,348 215,484 19,236 141,840 42,660 40,068 57,096 52,200 1,198,932 Depreciation 2,600,000 120,460 250,000 404,500 420,000 23,000 120,000 57,000 3,994,960 Interest 793,625 - 11,100 3,100 81,320 - - - 889,145 Transfers 100,000 1,340,100 - 1,440,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,998,203 $13,513,799 $ 889,386 $ 3,711,336 $ 1,887,431 $ 683,016 $ 1,602,275 $ 958,590 $37,244,036 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ 3,028,890 $ 86,300 $ 54,614 $ 133,714 $ (177,031) $ 81,284 $ (190,325) $ (115,090) $ 2,902,356 o'44 11e 0 •f� v • REPORT /RE[r)MMFNnnTInIU To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.B. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Resolution No. 2012 -106 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2012 -106 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -106 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Janet Mullen Six Canvasses For Class Use Mary Dvorak $50.00 2012 Members Juried Art Show Mary Dvorak $25.00 Memorial David Primrose Steven Fishbeck $100.00 2012 Members Juried Art Show Nora Leven $54.00 Memorial David Primrose Edina Communications & Technology Services Department: Edina Community Foundation $242.56 Digital SLR Camera Dated: September 4, 2012 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 4, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0389 1% a: o e � (J) C 0 • l�ro less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: VIII.C. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE ® Action Director of Engineering ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Ordinance No. 2012 -17 Amending Chapter 14 of Edina Code Concerning Bicycle Lanes. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve first reading of Ordinance No. 2012 -17, amending Chapter 14 of Edina Code concerning bicycle lanes and waive second reading. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At the January 3, 2012, City Council meeting, the City Council accepted the Edina Transportation Commission's recommendation of West 70th Street, Cahill Road, Antrim Road, and Valley View Road as corridors to establish as bike routes and designate and stripe as bike lanes. Staff prepared the attached plans for these corridors and has gathered comments from Mike Anderson with Alliant Engineering and Edina Transportation Commission. State Statute provides that the City may by resolution or by ordinance designate corridors as bike routes and bike lanes. At the August 6 City Council meeting the Council requested that staff look at designating bike lanes by way of ordinance. The City's legal counsel has prepared the attached ordinance, which includes all of the bike lanes within the City. Staff has attached the latest striping plans for the above mentioned corridors. Public Works staff will stripe and sign the above stated corridors once the ordinance is passed. The other corridors that are stated in the ordinance will be reviewed for signing and striping. These corridors will be brought up to the most current striping and signing within the next eight months. /_11 iIF_TA:ILy,IA►1 &5 Ordinance No. 2012 -17 Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of August 16, 2012 Proposed Bike Routes Plan — Sheets 1 through 27, dated August 3, 2012 Staff Report of January 3, 2012 G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \STREETS DIV \SIDEWALKS N BIKEWAYS \Bike Routes \Item VI.D. Resolution No. 2012 -100 Bike Lane Designations.docx ORDINANCE NO. 2012-17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING BICYCLE LANES The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 14 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding Section 1420 to provide as follows: 1420 - Bicycle Lanes 1420.01 Designation of Bicycle Lanes. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 160.263, the City designates as bicycle lanes those portions of the following streets which are separated from the motor vehicle lanes by physical barrier, striping, marking or other similar device: (a) Blake Road from Vernon Avenue to Fox Meadow Lane (b) Blake Road from Waterman Avenue to Spruce Road (c) Interlachen Boulevard from Blake Road to Vernon Avenue (d) 58th Street West from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue (e) 70th Street West from Normandale Road to Valley View Road (f) 70th Street West from Antrim Road to Metro Bouelvard (g) Cahill Road from 78th Street West to 701h Street West (h) Antrim Road from 70th Street West to Valley View Road (i) Valley View Road from Antrim Road to TH62 (j) 54th Street West from Wooddale Avenue to Minnehaha Boulevard (k) Valley View Road from Oaklawn Avenue to 641h Street West 1420.02 Motor Vehicles. No person may operate any motor vehicle, as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 169.011, Subdivision 42, on a bicycle lane, except as provided in Minnesota Statutes § 169.18, Subdivision 7(d). 1420.04 Operation of Bicycles. For purposes of this Section, the term "bicycle" has the meaning given that term in Minnesota Statutes § 169.011, Subdivision 4. Any person operating a bicycle on any street or bicycle lane must comply with Minnesota Statutes § 169.222. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication First Reading: September 4, 2012 Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk 165961v1 James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF CITY,OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM AUGUST 16, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Mfr The agenda was amended by member Janovy to move the BETF to afte munity Comment, to accommodate Sgt. ��i��rffr Olson who was in attendance for the Sidewalk Ordinance Discussi I n was made by member LaForce and APPROVAL OF MINUTES Kprr., REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 19, 2012 nd nd Member Whited amended the minutes to add the foll+o�i .g to the Streetcar Presentation to the 2 paragraph, 2 sentence, 'one stop parking option stands to help emphasize,Southdale as a go to place;. and this mode of operation is more friendly travel for seniors.' Motion was. made by mem LaForce and secon ember Janovy to approve °rrffr{., the amended July 19 minutes. All voted ave. Motion carried. W M`91 COMMUNITY COMMENT f`r,' 'f`ffrr• r f rt Gretchen Cooper and..Bill, 58tH & Chowen, said their eoncern;has gotten pro' gressive over the last 7 years with the number of cars that are speeding between 57 & 58,,.kand the increase in cut =thru traffic during the school year. She said r ' one month ago she yelled at a drive�g�about 40 -45 jnph an t o dr yer turned around came back and yelled ? � 'max• ����� rr��r <, _ ' explicits at her and said she wasspeeding because she vil'aseornmgdown <. #herhill. Ms. Cooper said something needs to be done. She said she is aware ta"t.speed bump.' umps are a problem for snow ploGvs and;she knows the police are monitoring the area but the problem mcrease�s•on•.the week'ends.and holidays usually. She saidthe drivers are both teens and adults. Director Houle; eff' sked if speec( ri�ice;tan ata was 50'ailable and hey aid he would need.to check. He said if the occurrences are . � fr, fr - .. at the same time;ev ry day. the po be notii (ed for smart enforcement. A school bus was noted as a culprit that speeds through t0s6me time every day: Mr. Houl'e`usaid larger vehicles can often appear to be going faster than they really are. Member Whited said the issue:;i' t the area is convenient for cut thru traffic and Mr. Houle said it is r / /.arr. '. flit scheduled for reconstruct[on in a couple s and they can look at plans to address the issues. Member Janovy said this area has come up a few times,"and wondered-if a slightly different approach should be taken. She said reviewing speed, volume, history of traffic safety,-T& uests; rashes is probably,a good starting point but asking residents-to wait a couple years might not be. Sugges'teds otions were putting out the speed monitor to educate drivers of how fast they are driving and adding it to the Traffie:5afety Committee (TSC) report in order to track it. Mr. Houle said staff will provide all the data at the next meeting and also add this to the TSC. Member lyer asked if staff tracks calls or issue areas and Mr. Houle said yes, they are tracked on a map. REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS Sidewalk Ordinance Discussion Member Janovy said at the TLC Bike Blvd public hearing, someone asked about bikes, strollers and wheelchairs on sidewalks and it was the first time she realized that bikes were not allowed. She brought the issue to the BETF and her report is from their discussion that recommends changing the ordinance to liberalize biking on sidewalk, allow biking on sidewalks in business districts and also allow parking on sidewalks. In conversation with the City of Minneapolis' bike 1 coordinator, he told her that they allow biking on sidewalks but not in business districts but he knows it happens and they are studying the issue. Peter Kelley, chair of the BETF and member Janovy met recently with Sgt. Olson to discuss the issue. BETF liaison, Sgt. Tim Olson, was in attendance to explain the Police Department's opinion on biking on sidewalks which he said is based on safety. Sgt. Olson said allowing bikes on sidewalk would increase the safety risks at the expense of a small percentage of bikers. He said the City was aware of what they were doing when the ordinance was put together. He said further that the City is making an effort to provide bike lanes on the roads and that state statute has specific rules for biking on roadways. Sgt. Olson said he met with members Janovy and Kelley and they agreed there is a public safety issue by riding on the sidewalk. He said the department is reluctant to support open use of the sidewalk but recognizes exceptions and inconsistencies, e.g., a child learning to ride on the sidewalk and a parent riding with the child are not safety concerns because they would be riding slow; the upcoming F'`"ce Avenue, sidewalk, project is not a concern because of the width of the sidewalk — it will not present a risk' having parking stations on sidewalks. He said the ordinance could be modified to address these exceptions and inconsistences. Additionally, the ordinance references a bike registration law that was repealed by the state irl25s in effect adhering to an outdated law. Discussion Member Whited asked about bike collisions with seniors. 4 d&7Sgt. Olson said to date;.tlere have not been any collisions on sidewalks. He said they do not actively enforce the side'waI ordinance and in fact, most:.ordinances are enforced based on complaints but at least the ordinance is in place whey er)forcement:,is necessar �"ht. , Member lyer asked if the ordinance should be'used�'for,�high traffic'areas`like 66th &Valley View versus a residential +?' .,. ..::•. street. Sgt. Olson said the biking population is so.small, it_does not warrant changing the ordinance. He said the focus should instead be on what is convenient for pede ans,'r�o for bikers. Member Bass said there are adu sidewalks everyday. She said ao do moderate their behavior accc who are making a safe choice ba Department's positio t at,it is effective becausejni r�ve 01 do',not like befi e?in the "s arexomfortabj NnAll' and there have nbe �r il ;omfoft'level and ability rdi 'awn eff(ftardless of v Rc dents an :'allowi current systerrlis well and`the }s no who already have ,a place to ride. , Member La Force asaillekordinance is atg� do not reflect the practices'-of �what is goir sidewalks and he wondere %at behavio most people would prefer to no have o add bikers to sidewalks. Sgt. Olson a 6 He said the City is making strides to accorr she sees both children and adults on teothers are not. She said also that people i any crashes; however, they should allow for people to do so legally. Sgt. Olson said she supports the Police rh�N ether it is legal to do so. He said the ordinance is g< -for change has the potential for problems. He said the isks to pedestrians based on a small population of bikers iod policjfla1iit he also thinks it is a problem when they have ordinances that n. He said most people are probably not aware that it is illegal to ride on =change they would see if they were to tell people. Sgt. Olson said he believes �ikers, on the sidewalk. Member lyer said it does increase the risks if they chat is the need to put bikes on sidewalk when there is an adjacent roadway. modate bikers with bike lanes like they have on 70th. He said integration of the different modes of transportation will create problems. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Iver to table the current discussion and allow them to think over what was learned fordiscussion'at a later date. All voted ave. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of August 1, 2012 Section A.I. Member Janovy did a revision of the speed table policy for discussion. She did not include a speed threshold because 27 mph, in context, could be considered unsafe so why wait for 30 -35 mph to do something. Member Thompson ask to remove item #6 and allow for engineering judgment and member Janovy said she would prefer not to. Members lyer and Nelson agreed that item #6 should be removed. Member Franzen said the revision is concise and well I written and agreed with deleting #6. Member Janovy agreed. Motion was made by member lyer and seconded by Section A.2 Member Janovy said the revision is nicely improved. She asked -about item #4 because she came home recently and found a contractor had closed Morningside Road. She said they had pulled a street bond but not a road closed permit. Sher asked if it should specify pulling both and also notifying residents because a resident coming home for lunch would not have had access. Mr. Houle said a road closed permit would require the contractor to post a detour but in this case he did not pull one. Regarding item #5, member Janovy asked if it would be helpful to reference the parking requirement either here or in item #6. Member Janovy will forward her comments to Mr. Houle for inclusion. Section A.3 Member Janovy said the statement "The City of Edina policy regarding parking restrictions requires present conditions that impacts traffic safety in order to restrict parking" is not ef�eeted in the current Parking Policy as the only factor. She said thereiare other reasons to restrict parking and noted. t_ "e %sentence as inaccurate or misleading. Section B.2 Member Jariovy circulated a memo explaining the background of t4i! intersection. She said this is a long 4 standing issue from the 2005 NE Study. She said a raised intefsection with marked crosswalk was originally planned but A�' r.. ,all raised intersections were taken out by the City CounciifS,, a said crossing at Griml8 , s.difficult because of visibility and �r rf l��Jf. there is frustration after having stopped at six stops signs previously. She said the intersection serves as crossing for the '?4f•r. Country Club, 501h & France, and 44tH and France. f} s r, Member Bass said another stop sign is adding r+Jf{rr {r;r., aJ'roblem further downAhe road and suggested a traffic circle, not to stop cars but slow them down. Member Janovy said a- tXaffrcrcircle was recommended in a Resident Area Safety Improvement plan but since that time the curb line was reconstr fted.'WIr1 Joule said thejntersection was realigned to fix a surface water issue but that it could be realigned to fit a traffic circle antic "rosswalkscoul be included. He said he would prefer to do a study so that he could in eF16Xth'e east wherefspeedi grI soc urging. Member Thompson agreed and suggested a corridor study instead_ of sporreview. Mr. Houle suggested'deferring this to a later date to lay out a plan for a corridor study. This was moved:ao. sect ion: ti " '�ri:• b ' feer Motion made by member Bass and second dbv_> member Thompson to approve the amended August 1 TSC report. All voted ave. Motion carifdfrfl s '� a 2012 Bikeways Project r,, `J r •. ri JJl Mr. Houle said Cit ` %-uncil re, ueste" iat.Alliant:Engineering look at the plans and Mike Anderson's memo and mark - 1 s r q sJ• rr,,.:, to JJfi$J f {JJr . . ups were distributed.'He; said the BE alsp:.eviewed. the plans and their memo and'mark -ups for 70 & Antrim were also distributed and he reco�rimended acc�e- ting their suggestion. Member Janovy said she compared the original plans 11 to the mark ups and will gi a }M . Houle he f ridings. Additionally, Mr. Houle sought suppolcv 6K'u'sing a resolution or an ordinance to designate bike lanes. The consensus was to use an ordinance and to revise.therd.. ordinance to.end at'...Section 169.222.' in section 1420.04. Mr. Houle said the plans will go back to City Council on Sept 4 and the Public Works Department Will begin shortly thereafter. Motion made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass to support the bike and striping plans with clarification of questions raised and ordinance with deletion of everything after 169.222 in section 1420.04. All voted ave. Motion carried. Updates Student Member Mr. Houle said a new student member was appointed and she will begin next month. 3 Bike Edina Task Force – Minutes of July 12, 2012 Member Janovy said the BETF voted to become a working group of the ETC because it is currently not part of the City structure and this was made very clear by CM Neal when chair Kelley sought reimbursements for expenditures related to the BETF website and he was told the BETF was similar to the Hockey Association and reimbursement was not approved. She said they discussed whether or not they would be able to continue to function as it has, if it becomes a working group. She said they have their own website and gets in kind donation and would they be able to continue this way. She said the BETF was set up for a specific task and the task was completed but they've continued to operate as though they were part of the City structure. Discussion to be continued. Living Streets Working Group Member Thompson said he asked for comments on the overview that the consultant gave at the last meeting and those comments were received and forwarded to the consultant. He said tf phandout is a revision that includes the comments. Member Thompson said the next step is to meet with stagy other commissions, other stakeholders and public outreach. Member Laforce asked if people have heard about this people who are interacting with Do.Town have been tol certain that there is a candidate running for City Council to Rd have ff(bV fded any feedback. Member Bass said Complete Streets. Member La Force said he is fairly nst it. Moving forward, phase 1 is done said member Thompson and "tease 2 $150,000 developing their plan. Member Janovy .-asked if franchise fee: said he included $200,000 in his budget for this1type of work plus a Member Bass suggested putting together a progress repo :t for the oril 'bin ff�,id f�r for phase II. Member Janovy said she had asked` "thi,sr of Robin, and s r�! 4 rl {rf i recommended having a consultant and trans portatio $ ,staff botfi�:woi Bass said Do.Town staff is available'n�tilMarch 2013.�f; unfunded. He said%,& Paul spent approximately guld be used for poliM. development. Mr. Houle ,ransportation engineer and he could reword it. is funders and see if they have additional funds 1M.- sd did not have any more funds. Mr. Houle ng ontthis so he will redo his budget. Member Member Whited said they reviewedtVEAP's program to see out it can serve Edina's needs. Her agency, PRISM, and VEAP will be agencies tha•ft.l,ennepin Co , ,ll rre y to se r e:communities when they break up their downtown F�r�rf�?frrffl�r�f }} 1 r ✓f ?!. service center. NeXVmbhth Becky 1—Bride),.. project manager�fro Ahe Met Council will be in attendance to talk about rf fir r � rl �f the BE Line so trhe. roup can see.�if ;rfcan B&fo� (Edina and�he timing is perfect as they are looking at revamping this line. The working grouup ninutes will be me tided m5t e ETC packet from now on. CORRESPONDENCE ANp'f?ETITIONS– No e/h:_ L lff rf {f ill Member Janovy asked if'tki�sis when they would talk about 58 & Halifax and member Whited said she wondered the same about her neighborhood if it sho.u' be discussed under Living Streets. Mr. Houle said the correspondence was rJ,f�frr frfrr sent to Council and staff and it`is not clea r..o�him what should be brought forward to the ETC. He said it is difficult when staff is being pulled in so many di�e_et onsf {when they are already doing so much and residents do not believe that staff is doing anything to help. He said it is difficult when there are no funding, limited state aid funds or requests not meeting state aid requirements. Member Thompson said part of it is education and recognizing that they cannot help everyone. Member Bass said the goal is to generate support now for when street projects come around. Member Janovy said it is also getting people involved with programs like as Operation Lead Foot. They talked about inexpensive ways to deal with speeding such as equipping residents with radar guns, flagging speed limit signs to draw attention and getting residents involved at the neighborhood level. Chair Nelson asked if these emails are forwarded to the traffic safety coordinator and Mr. Houle said this was the first of its kind so they need to develop a process because they will be receiving more. Member Bass said engineering is the best approach since not everyone will become involved but it looks like the City Council is responding residents and this is -helpful. 4 CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS 2013 Work Plan Chair Nelson said CM Neal wants this by September. Suggested items were Sidewalk Plan; Way Finding for sidewalks /pedestrians and standard for signage;. France Ave 'Crosswalks; Safe Routes to School; Review Transportation & CIP; Pedestrian Plan; same items as last year's plan excluding the TLC Bike Blvd; and communication /education. Chair Nelson will update the 2013 Work Plan and email to everyone. Chair Nelson said he spoke with Floyd Gabriel, chair of the Planning Commission (PC) about scheduling a meeting between the two commissions to talk about planning and transportation and the meeting is scheduled for September 27, 6 -7 p.m. (one hour before the PC's regular schedule meeting). He said it is not a mandatory meeting for the ETC and the agenda is still to be defined. Chair Nelson said Hennepin County is drafting a Pedestrian Plan and Rose�Ryan is willing to attend the next meeting to talk about it. He said the are having community meetings but notll- It" an�i ed for Edina - the closest meeting is in the Y g Y g g' P �� g Crystal /New Hope area. -A; rYrrd'f' "h�'b th th Member Janovy said Councilmember Brindle mentioned. �o'ntraflow bike lanes on Normandale between 66 & 70t'. She r>r t . said the shoulder has been mistaken for bike lane and asked %if�it could be striped for bike4. ane. She asked what the �f/r? x \, process is when a councilmember brings up something that IN-,," "aced to transportation unng a council meeting. Mr. Houle said they generally follow up with the councilmemberand sCaff i currently working on,`a�Ieasibility study for bike thr•r;f �C lanes and sidewalk on Normandale between 66•a d570 ter; .ff ��� Member Janovy said at TAB they still do not know how muc federal moneyrl hey will. be getting. She said the Met Council has a new website, Thrive Msp.com, and w ntt°s peop�to weigh in on hat's needed to thrive in 2040 — housing, rrr,r jobs, transportation, etc. f� 1� f r�f��f�r .l,•�;. `' �' � r.�•� Member Whited said a new neighbor parks ar with a Houle suggested contacting Sgt. Olson Member lyer sainel`glibor��s ed h'im< about the this in his staff,report. <: rf`;�r .R r days at a time and wondered if this was legal. Mr. ent interest rates. Mr. Houle said he will cover l Member FranzemZdli `: he attended t 013 Neight'grhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting and it was y�ti rir r. one of the best ran public ;meetings he's er;attended and in speaking with neighbors they also felt the same way. He said it was very decisive and: residents kneur , hat was or was.not allowed and:there was no room for them to go off on tangents about things such �e-special as essment. Chair Nelson said there appear oestreojects going on that the ETC did not know about, i.e. the frontage road near City Hall. Mr. Houle said Public orks, is doing a mill and overlay project. Member Janovy said this type of work provides opportunity for restriping. Mr. Houle said he will speak with Brian Olson, Public Works Director to learn their schedule. STAFF COMMENTS France Avenue Update — Mr. Houle said option 3 was approved by City Council for a $4M budget; staff is working with property owners to acquire ROW at no cost; the monuments were taken out; existing sidewalk at Whole Foods will stay; starting detail plans immediately; finalizing memo to the state ;within the next week; and will reach out to Hennepin County for funding gap. It is unknown at this.time if the newly acquired ROW would become the City's or Hennepin County's. 5 TLC Bike Boulevard Update —this project will begin next week - Wooddale to be seal coated by Public Works; and a counter /video monitor was mounted today at 60th & Wooddale to take bike and pedestrian counts as part of the project. Status 2012 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects — Richmond Hills, Countryside, and Tracy Ave projects will be going through September /October; others will be completed by Labor Day. Status 2013 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects — informational meeting held for 4 of 5 neighborhoods; Normandale is scheduled for September 5 (being consulted to SEH); staff incorporated recommendations from the communications audit that was done (executive summary will be shared with the ETC); draft feasibility studies will be ready for the next meeting; checking to see if staff can have a special public hearing meeting with City Council to approve all the projects at once.;,. On August 6, City Council approved first reading of a franchise fee per�'hdW/6to fund sidewalks, trails and street lights so fl,r�'� no longer assessed. The special assessment policy was revised to i �clude payback from 10 .to 15 years and interest rate from 2 to 1 percent above the bond interest rate. At the next Cif�,,Council meetirig:they will reconsider including the 2011 project areas into the policy change. Member Janovy asked for an update on W. 44th at the ADJOURNMEV Vr Meeting adjou ATTACHMENT Attendance Sp ng. L f Ti +'i THE RD NO _ .z o , N _ NORMANDALE ROAD r _ d n aM mm p Lim twfu ISM wfl LFl`1Rl 1 � 1 � 1 lie, �E >..�_ �V - ' wd � {"..; / M `=°`ier+�f�•• `�. •mss ' �. ,� I N J 2 ao m m — Aj +� s f 4W ; r SHARE.. ,. THE _ y ROAD ILL— r.: y D 2 p I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED ME OR - O m • • rS' o UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED P ROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING aD o ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA @CITY STRIPING AND SIGNS 7450 METRO BOULEVARD Edina, MN 55439 -3037 �*T _ ti.1�D MO n DATE uc N0. 43970 Ph: 952.826 -0371 Fax: 952 -826 -0392 7 w/n BTU TO S>Na MO NEW SIGN PLACEMENT N0. DA BY REMARKS \\ \ \ \ \� -% 5 1 •� O won 0 do ,• w � � T `1 w o ° a 0 -0 D 2 M D I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 1 1 � n � UNDERWAY DIRECT A AND THAT I AM A OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING o DULY DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD• ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS @CITY 7450 METRO BOULEVARD Edina, MN 55439 -3037 A jvD cap, 2 , Vm/v BT BT EM COWeRS MD CORRECTIONS t 2 ^T �, o c > mA Ph: 952 - 826 -0371 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT wN a+Arx� ro smvelc uo scNs iv x s —a DATE UC. NO. 43970 Fax: 952 -826 -0392 N0. DATE BY REMARKS REVISIONS t� s a.. i I III i I 4 •G " m > e -, Air F dam' y I g ti t 1 !TI + + ✓i y Mw!F s dd 14 Y "1ii o law j sy�z M V� c r f 2 win BT LTC COMMENTS Am CORRECTIONS 1 vwu BT py {5 70 SIRPNC AND SKM NO DATE BYI REMARKS REVISIONS o I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS LAN i avx� UNDERWAY DIRECT SUPERVISION R CITY OF EDINA m AND THAT I AM A DULY p�N'0'M� PROPOSED STRIPING o ° REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. W ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF N 7450 METRO BOULEVARD AND SR a w THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS ��� �d° Edina. MN 55439 -3037 c�� iV N j xx n m "� p' Ph: 952 -826 -0371 N d i DATE UC. NO, 43970 Fax: 952 - 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT idi I {. �d 0— Pt pplq—%k- G) O > m 121P r A: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION 2012 BIKE BLVD. @CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING m AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL co ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 7450 METRO BOULEVARD 2 Amm BT E7C COMMOM Am CORRECTsows Ija THE STATE OF MI STRIPING AND SIGNS AND - MINNESOTA Edina. MN 55439-3037 m Z Ph: 952-826-0371 1 — BT mqcm M STRpjNG " SGNS m DATE. UC. NO. 43970 Fax: 952-826-0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT -E0 DATE BY REMARKS ---I I REVISIONS « g, s �,:�,� -. ,. ...+�.<. ,..,wv,.......�... +r.+.+.... .. � ,.. ., � .+f „;,,i a 'rLF� { ; i �A.► .u. L. F I'; IT rK Aoll y All ;J + Y t :. r. '-: 1. M1 �+* r, .= ,�'smuw.,'. ;.,:r+r,•a.."�`�'i s w A a-. '4R ' x r m 1 c r e. r� L µ r i t ya Ly'q It . r • t rZ'., , as r x f K� V t r • i "'7 �" k. �� ;'• �`''� °•e 4# m : BIKE CANE i la - l-i � • �f 1 �� I` r a a r ri�, 3NY7 ti = A -a D I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR cm's m 0 4 UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING a OD • • `" ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS @CITY 7450 METRO BOULEVARD Edina. MN 55439 -3037 /� jUD A 2 +/aA+ BT Cp�1LiS AD CORRECTMS i Ph: 952 -826 -0371 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT 1 wn: BT auNC¢ TO STFFW AND says N = DATE LIC. NO. 43970 Fax: 952 -826 -0392 N0. DATE BY REMARKS �Y *. f � y r r 4 f, fY•, 1 $ tn�`'� _ II qcr �• a!` _ s � . Jll M 1 s x s 4 6 ♦ . yih 1 r t i � a t. Li � � ,�� i fi � a r� � .• !� t ' fA 4 w , i7 ; �t 1 0 w 4 � n ! o � R or 41L p s , o,� / +: r f trr4� -w t�*I t a ;.mac' Joe Ile a hi 4. ! • y s� O D r••r � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS Dvx� UNDERWAY DIRECT A DULY CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING 0 � m • AND THAT I AM A DULY p»��i 4 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. �/�n��((ti2 W • • ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 1m 7450 METRO BOULEVARD D 2 IT EM COMMENTS AND CowsECnalS THE STATE OF MINNESOTA \ p D STRIPING AND SIGNS a Edina, 95 55439 -3037 '+q®�' Ph: 952 - 826 -0371 1 .nw IT a+ANMs TO sTevnc AND scx{s N : - DATE: UC. NO. 43970 Fax: 952- 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT NO DATE BYI REMARKS REMSIONS at♦y t �J- 1. " rr 4, 46+00 .. 47 +OD 47 +55 .ia 1i 0 m m w 0 T$ O ' s ' — I y e. 1 Y' m µ Y rls • i .l. V> �t '' ��•'T'1S �iww �,��y Y.y�.� rte-.. - ,`�y4: wt"tll��a =;r h'� � •�p"�*+l lr,�.'^"....� ?g!� �i o f y 1 IM Al sgll1W.« 7 x i�lE"in' G µ't�f' �� yam' ✓ZS � ! �W �5.," .. • ri r.._ 3i f .1b_l.'4t'�t - •y ��S _. psi _. _._ _ _ -0 D 'n0 =' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS m y PLAN WAS PREPARED ME OR CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING !�. n UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION VISION m • - AND THAT I AM A DULY p�N ^• M, a REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. �'�� m ENGINEER UNDER THE LAW e m 1 S • �I 5 of rl 1� 7450 METRO BOULEVARD D 2 V-/A BT Lr CM01ENts AND COFKCnau > W THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS �\� a° Edina. MN 55439 -3037 1, o � n m q� �' Ph: 952 - 826 -0371 1 wic BT q{µ� ro STM SIGNS N x K DATE UC. N0. 43970 Fax: 952 - 826 -0392 NEAP SIGN PLACEMENT N0. DATE BY REMARKS REVISIONS -#rr 1-=' P4 7 -A L AV 2 BT LTC CweITS AND canufoNs BT ' - "' -- AM SM S SEEN z 2 BT LTC CweITS AND canufoNs BT ' - "' -- AM SM S SEEN HILLSIDE LA a v=im 0 m F� HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR - C C) ;� mp U AY MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLN CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING co SR :3. I co F? 1- "mpco ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS e 1% �sl 0 1 7450 METRO BOULEVARD Edina, MN 55439-3037 AND w _Q 5 :a K --A. DATE- Url NO. 4 3970 Ph: 952-826-0371 Fax: 952-826-0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT 2 BT LTC CweITS AND canufoNs BT ' - "' -- AM SM IWO low, WESTON CIR --j / a: co m m i Ti BIKE LANE ROUE Jll TRACY AVENUE O 0 IWO- gf. tit I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS u m :p. PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR C, UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD• co oo p ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 7450 METRO BOULEVARD > THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Edina, MN 55439-3037 AND n ED STRIPING AND SIGNS Ph: 952-826-0371 @ K ,DATF,-_ LIC. NO. _I397_0 Fax: 952-826-0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT ETC COMM13M AND CORFIECTIONS CHANGES TO SMPWG AND SKINIs REMARKS REVISIONS y i N N 0 - s t �. i . i `"° AKA �,w. ■ M'. L.. - ` r �I f- U a R-_. O 2 Cn m m k' N tk t O 1 r w � r .� .`may ✓1 - -.. t�� r a_ e V*" «u w .. o ti 'sow ti D _ � D I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED ME OR tmi m ° UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I R A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. �F EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING D 00 w ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS @CITY 7450 METRO BOULEVARD Edina, MN 55439 -3037 AND rug 2 wl/Al BT ETC CMANTS Mp CoIwcTms N = Fax: 952 -826 -0 92 1 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT NO BT awKE.s To STIapm AND sas DATE BY REMARKS DATE UC. NO. 43970 . -►nom r.. '� • fir'' - w`r..i/�w f' - �` t 7 r -' 'o' �1 a. OR • «. 8 3118 g N1939 _ it _ �'j IL w 10 9Y� O �x W m O ANTRIM R9 +DD O f �1 A,.., f . • d BIKE r SOU • �t t s µ� ,.�..,} -. bu � ,t.•lY�, �• r s � e f 1 0 ., M = m .. LA - g o I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS y s cmi D PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR (@CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING � UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION loo c .. AND THAT AM A DULY o .. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD• ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 7450 METRO BOULEVARD AND 2 Vmm BT ETC WuNiS AM OOFWCnONS w THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS Edina, MN 55439 -3037 tf1V I n A Ph: 952 - 826 -0371 1 Mw BT aANC�s TO STRPHG AM SwM ^� N = DATE UC. NO. 43970 Fax: 952- 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT N0. DATE BY REMARKS • �.,- � �lnc� < o I I + P, 4- >lv •�� 'a» a 'i T D1Z • } USE w 0 0 0 0 N O N N 1S H109 j . 3NYl 3X18 r. µ r• } 1 + b !11 2012 BIKE BLVD. STRIPING AND SIGNS BIKE 7MERN r' :r B } �,r . , r w . i o n n p HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS m y• v m D PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR a .. UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY m REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ii ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF D r� THE STATE OF MINNESOTA N c� D v q ry x � DATE UC. NO. 0g7n !11 2012 BIKE BLVD. STRIPING AND SIGNS BIKE 7MERN r' :r B } �,r . Ilk i 1�; , r w . i • y• ii Ilk i 1�; , r w . i 7" BIKE LANE }f .� ryV. .; A' i } t !a~ 1 } `^• St ��. i `� � : �_ •��} � ail } is • p Ij _ .. •+171"+ _ �', �NaM CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING 7450 METRO BOULEVAR `+ t �I/ til \D Z va/u BT ETC CO &KM AID CORRECTIMS \ Edina, MN 55439 -3037 I " Ph: 952 -626 -0371 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT N,O. DATE BY mREMARKS D 5ars Fax: 952 -826 -0392 0 14�-d aim > 71 I ilv ILL I ti Hill 14110A low fir A - p4gi..- ter, > m q5tv 4 p, L91 Rou- ip- OL ILL x I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN AS PREPARED BY ME OR ;,a C-) UNDERWAY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY @CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING Y7 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. co p ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 7450 METRO BOULEVARD CID THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND S� '-, -) co STRIPING AND SIGNS Edina, MN 55439-3037 w 2 . Ph: 952-626-0371 UC. NO. 43970 Fox: 952-826-0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT a 2 "m I BT ETC 01hum AND COMMIONS I wn BT MAmm To STWK AN[) ears i lw he ... i 1l7 AP . � ,, - ' ,rte . • ,,. . y w r�. I.. r_ 4• � rr p� i 0 EK I . . . P a C r P V G O s m O D C7 p m D I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED ME OR � � mo •. UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ER AND THAT I R A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING co p .. ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS @CITY 7450 METRO BOULEVARD Edina, MN 55439 -3037 Hl \D 2 v+Ne BT ETC COI&EMS AW CORRECTIONS m N = 3 A DATE UC. ND. 43970 Ph: 952 -626 -0371 Fax: 952 -826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT 1 N0. DATE BT To sTRANC AND saa BY REMARKS REVISIONS \ ,. 17 f• A ..'e`z°w"""°"" s -_ ' „� ,yt�4,`N;. fi;{. ; rf » t } it - • w... 7fY`� .,�.. �.. , " c+ f .. �� f ... • , , ",.��� tm"'" "fir`,: �,,•�;� 'a�e'�'i • a. r '�► � + � .ate _ 'f!'*4,• �.as1�'"� +.d'�: �y t r ` a r lip- 00 n f, _ " A co V (n 1,�� x T. .. _,.. �' 1 a� .�_ 2�"+•' I t� <� 9x00 co Iff- A� J Lr » o a M p I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS a a x ti y PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR p x UNDER AT DIRECT SUPERVISIDN OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING o .. AND THAT I AM A DULY 2012 BIKE BLVD. @CITY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ou ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 7450 METRO BOULEVARD *T THE STATE OF MINNESOTA j'�jr D SR D `" STRIPING AND SIGNS Edina, MN 55439 -3037 2 ' tl BT ESC calvo+is uo cotffscr>aHs o c� m Ph: 952 -826 -0371 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT ' '"'M BT '� LNG �o ny = A DATE uC. N0. 7 Fax: 952 - 826 -0392 N0. DATE BY REMARKS REVISIONS x clr x00 c1 a * 4 00 co H xr ny » r • V, ei� e ,r D c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS - - m D 0 - -0 m D PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR -+ C7 UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION m AND THAT I AM A DULY p NA M CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING r5'- ° REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. �'��� Ir co o ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF $r @ lv 7450 METRO BOULEVARD A�i D w THE STATE OF MINNESOTA o L'�l�D 2 wn BT EIC errs uo CORRECTIONS w STRIPING AND SIGNS �� Edina, 95 55439 -3037 N N o n A "� �' Ph: 952 - 826 -0371 1 .nw BT p y Ta srRANG w0 sa+s N = r -+ DATE UC. N0. 43970 Fax: 952- 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT NO. DATE BY REMARKS REVISIONS - a K � w^ o , lip . av ."� �.�°", ` `•ten. 6� + f CO , .I M- % y� 00Y,. 4 . S • d R sift law qpM N 41 Ail r �. •- ,; . ,. �, , : asp'"` i• a 1 _• try. w4 y,..'' ''•e:`"* w , .w !' ^Z .. ''�rw�"'.• ,.. / 4 —M /4 -t� i .. lift y T i �➢t 1 .:a'� i a u.,ayJn Ty,� `i i - + y ,.. n „ 9;e M� .,.r r } � �� Y_' ,,. It p .. „„ .. :. ... !f`. r� ”- .� •� � " �R. } t , 4• k '�';F*,'.,f }nom ¢ ,5 ....- " ., •E c ?� +r Sr; , #b'p'i �` �: •. Ali �` � � �' arr.. 4 % •� o > n C) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS t! a v = 0 n UNDERWAY DIRECT A DULY CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING 07 • • AND THAT I AM A DULY p� \� r� p REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD• co R ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF I l�rn 7450 METRO BOULEVARD 2 Vmm BT ETC COMMENTS AND LOAECTK*M D w THE STATE OF MINNESOTA \ /° Edina, MN 55439 -3037 AND o n STRIPING AND SIGNS a Ph: 952 - 826 -0371 V" BT CHANCES To SIRFlNa AND 9CNS N = DATE: UC. NO. 4 7 Fax: 952- 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT NO. DATE BY REMARKS REVISIONS �d ,v Ys+ R o D m m I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS D >' x � m C3 m n PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING a m n UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION o.. AND THAT I AM A DULY 2012 BIKE BLVD. @CITY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CD ° ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 7450 METRO BOULEVARD 59 D W THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Edina, MN 55439 -3037 Av D STRIPING AND SIGNS NEAP SIGN PLACEMENT w N m Ph: 952- 826 -0371 v ru x K ;:a DAIS UC. N0. 43970 Fax: 952- 826 -0392 L ww- BT I ETC CC#Axs AND CMCIIONS 1 v, BT pWlC6 m S-Mnw, ,W 3( +N ��d 4 r r• __ k ter. y nt� b • � vb C' R ' 1 i. +4 k g � Ail +r� { t4 :. { •i Ilk SONS r i 3101 3)(Is BIKE w.. e LAHE ._ BEGIN t ir D v i A I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS - .^�. C) n WAS PREPARED R UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING a .. AND THAT I PR A DULY 2012 BIKE BLVD. ��'~� A�T REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL �" yZ ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF e \J'� 7450 METRO BOULEVARD ti1�D 2 ww" BT ETC COMMDM AND CORRECTIONS C.+ THE STATE OF MINNESOTA �T �� /a� Edina, MN 55439 -3037 STRIPING AND SIGNS ,yy� o Ph: 952 - 826 -037, 1 � BT EHANM TO 5MR� AND SKNS v N A DATE UC. NO. 439]0 Fax: 952 - 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT N0. DATE BY REMARKS 75 +00 70TH STREET e +Do p - - 1 _"�1� Fir► s + r 1s ! +► � } T WF.% ,I! "t, .. r # r B p t a + I.IY , rn + O l D 2 �l s G 8 BIKE LAS 7' ENDS 1!r e 1 .r� ♦� t-.*t, 9 t i r E Ate ` � i I o o ! A ¢ �l s G 8 BIKE LAS 7' ENDS 1!r e 1 .r� ♦� t-.*t, 9 t i r E Ate ` i A ¢ ' o z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WAS PREPARED R UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THATI �Pj �11��,1 l f/ n PROPOSED STRIPING o R A DULY REGISTERED PRDFESSIONAL 12 BIKE BLVD 2 ETC WAuffS AND MEC110NS W • • ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS @CITY 7450 METRO BOULEVARD Edina, MN 55439 -3037 �ND rug JDATEBY Ph: 952 -826 -0371 SIGN PLACEMENT CHmws TO SREPNC AND 9GNS i, - -- DATE: UC. N0. 43970 Fax: 952- 826 -0392 -NEW NO, REMARKS a , ~` • F � • ° .. for— 4 s+ i !Ar AMUNDSON AVE Ilk- 0048— g It he x ' F 4 mow•. i;4 +r.• - 'SP•°ar t. • g. a .. f r • ice' �, • ' ,► � ,♦ "' � ,� ,� + v .:.y :,► — awe ., LL n v 2 U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS - -� UNDERWMY DIRECT SUPERVISION E��ti CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING pr�*I .. AND THAT I AM A DULY piµ A'�+. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. / 2 r • • ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF �I1`u, 7450 METRO BOULEVARD �T n W THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS "\ /� Edina, MN 55439 -3037 * D 2 — BT � GEs m s ""° COv SGNNS N I o > ��' Ph: 952 - 826 -0371 1 Wn� BT CFIAN(k5 ro S RPNC MD 9d6 N = DATE UC. NO. 43970 Fax: 952 - 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT NO DATE BY REMARKS REVISIONS frs •4 4,t ,b NN r- "k e }� f v a , s.. ti air art 8 1 I e 5 a . . y t 1 > t + 0 J6, _ 4 w t 71,1:l a c'1 o I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS y A a PLAN WAS PREPARED ER ME OR OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION @CITY o.. AND THAT I R A DULY 2012 BIKE BLVD• REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF7450 METRO BOULEVARD A 1�T71 A D 2 '�" BT � G�rns vo caaECTans THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS Edina, 95 55439 -3037 Ph: 952 -626 -0371 1 wia BT piNK,T:S m srt"c AND scNs n> 2 K —+ DATE UC. ND. 43970 Fax: 952 -826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT NO. DATE BY REMARKS REVISIONS O Qj INC I e 5 a . . y t 1 > t + 0 J6, _ 4 w t 71,1:l a c'1 o I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS y A a PLAN WAS PREPARED ER ME OR OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION @CITY o.. AND THAT I R A DULY 2012 BIKE BLVD• REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF7450 METRO BOULEVARD A 1�T71 A D 2 '�" BT � G�rns vo caaECTans THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STRIPING AND SIGNS Edina, 95 55439 -3037 Ph: 952 -626 -0371 1 wia BT piNK,T:S m srt"c AND scNs n> 2 K —+ DATE UC. ND. 43970 Fax: 952 -826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT NO. DATE BY REMARKS REVISIONS r 9 w, t m µ .� A�YAII Mµ t �y is 1-06- Nm 4x. a.. E r C "` .. 01► ; Ar t � f r i >is 4 d� 1 �f r M f I !-77 - t � i� o � , i o w y Ali { ETC CM40M AND CORRECTIONS CHANGES TO STWW AND WNS D 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS LAN - c'I o .. UNDERWAY DIRECT A DU AND THAT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. ������ CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING o C. • • ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA / e 2 l� 7450 METRO BOULEVARD /�� 2 yon, g iw D N w STRIPING AND SIGNS \� �'' /° Edina, MN 55439 -3037 Edina, MN 55439 -3 ""D 1 BI ; m W r.Y x DATE _ UC. N0. 43970 Fax: 952 -826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT N0, ►mow DATE B7 ETC CM40M AND CORRECTIONS CHANGES TO STWW AND WNS �� d v. c� I xK m � , 4 s. �+ t eyww 1 ♦ f . r - rye, #_. ... P`'y � w ... k x O i o a 1 1p v BIKE LANI N W O O • I I t} N O f - 11' 1 N O O O 2 vwn BT I M COYIETITS AND co1:?EcTJ s 1 NYIf BT I p{µCES TO MpW AW SIGNS -_ 6' 1 o UAL m 'D > C7 (Z) > m y I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR •1. !'�. A ;K m •• A- a UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I R A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 2012 BIKE BLVD. ����� CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING 00 ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA y a �a 7450 METRO BOULEVARD AND AND � a �, w STRIPING AND SIGNS .° '*.��' Edina, MIN 55439-3037 � o � n m ry = K A DATE: UC. NO. _43970 95 Ph: 952 -826 -0371 71 Fax: 952- 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT 2 vwn BT I M COYIETITS AND co1:?EcTJ s 1 NYIf BT I p{µCES TO MpW AW SIGNS *11w, { r + f - 1p ---1 *. �i '",� '+Y, ~•L !« � � 'fir,, S t �1 sdmm'%..w �^ 2 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 11 STRIPING a a PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR /���� �� L�71��� PROPOSED rJT1�IPING UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION \NA. Mr (' L'j // mp.. AND THAT R A DULY 2012 BIKE BLVD• C. C ° REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL F'a���"y ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF @ m 7450 METRO BOULEVARD jUT THE STATE OF MINNESOTA `}'�4 �° Edina, MN 55439 -3037 AND STRIPING AND SIGNS �' N ti ; 5 n m *��' Ph: 952 - 826 -0371 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT v r. = i A DATE UC. NO. 43970 Fax: 952 -826 -0392 2 "v- BT ETC COMMENTS AND CORKCDDNS 1 w. BT aNANCEs TO SIMPNG AND SIGNS i r • �� . �. TWU YA lop ol All `c t 1 A 1 �yy , i s � f s 0 F w ' P a x� sswy ` .. n !i`L Py - W., X. -.. 1 *� a k r r Jr' _. t i 1 'k S� o a c7 p I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ;a P a x nD AND THAT DIRECT DULY ��.�ti CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED STRIPING F? AND THAT I PR A DULY 2012 BIKE BLVD. �� "``M' A m o .. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL y ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF �r e 7450 METRO BOULEVARD AND y c,+ THE STATE OF IAINNESOTA �\ /�° Edina, MN 55439 -3037 Lil\ D 2 '�'a'= BT DOVID115 AND Op2RECi10N5 N o STRIPING AND SIGNS �,�" Ph: 952.826 -0371 BT CHANCES TD SMIC AND SIGNS N ; DATE UC. NO. 43970 Fax: 952- 826 -0392 NEW SIGN PLACEMENT NO. DATE BY REMARKS REMSIONS 0 M Vco� aa� ,fee REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.O. From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: January 3, 2011 Subject: 2012 Bike Routes Recommendation ACTION REQUESTED: Staff is preparing striping /signage plans and cost estimates for the proposed bike routes as recommended by the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC). If Council does not object, staff will plan for the bike route improvements in 2012 provided Public Works maintenance funds are available. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The ETC was presented with a recommendation from the Edina Bike Task Force (BETF) for the Public Works Department to sign and stripe four segments of bike routes in 2012: 1. 70th Street — Antrim to Hwy 100 2. Cahill Road — 70th to 78th Street 3. Valley View Road — Antrim Road to Hwy 62 4. 50th Street — Wooddale Avenue to Halifax Avenue The ETC reviewed the recommendation of the BETF and commented that 50th Street will be the most difficult bike route to install. The ETC suggested that Public Works efforts focus in the southwest corner of the City to extend the bike network that was recently started with the completion of 70th Street. Their recommendation included the following streets: 1. 70th Street —Antrim to Hwy 100 2. Cahill Road — 70th to 78" Street 3. Antrim Road — 70th Street to Valley View Road 4. Valley View Road — Antrim Road to Hwy 62 I:\Admin \Councl Packets 2012 \2012 -01-03 \Item IV. 0.2012 Bike Routes Recommendation.docx . The ETC added Antrim Road as the logical connection between 70th Street and Valley View Road. All the suggested routes are State Aid roads and designated as primary bike routes in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figure 7.11. The routes will be analyzed for compliance with State Aid standards, possible revised parking restrictions and the possibility of .lowering the speed limit to 25 mph per State Statue 160.263. If revisions to the parking or speed limit are suggested staff will bring these recommendations to Council for approval prior to implementation. ATTACHMENTS: ETC 2012 Bike Route Graphic Draft ETC Meeting Minutes — December 15, 2011 ETC — Bike Edina Task Force Bike Routes Report/Recommendation 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Bicycle Facilities Figure 7.11 I '.\Admin \Council Packets 2012 \2012 -01-03 \Item IV. 0.2012 Bike Routes Recommendatlon.docx w. r,A O N le YcO ee °s REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.D From: Cary Teague, Community Action Development Director ® Discussion Information Date: September 4, 2012 Subject: Sketch Plan Review, 6500 France Avenue. Deadline No Deadline for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Provide comment regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: As a result of the City Council's recommendation to deny to the two phase 4 -6- story medical building at 6500 France Avenue, the applicant is requesting consideration of a new sketch plan proposal for the site. The revised plan proposes a one -phase 5 -story building with the mechanical equipment to be located inside the building. The overall height would not exceed the height of the mechanical equipment on the roof of the previously proposed four -story building. The site plan is generally similar to the previous plan; access to the site would remain from 65th Street, with a secondary right out on France. The following are the differences in the proposed plans from the previous plans: ➢ Five (5) -story building with no roof top mechanical equipment, 62 feet tall. (Previous building was six (6) stories and measured 88 feet to the top of the mechanical equipment.) ➢ Attached parking ramp. (Previous ramp was detached.) ➢ 5 -level parking ramp. (Previous ramp was 4- levels.) Pit ➢ Proposed building has a rounded grand building entry appearance at 65th & France. (Previous building had a traditional sharp building corner at 65th and France.) ➢ Green roof on top of the building. (Previous plan had a green roof only on the two building podiums.) Planning Commission Review: On August 22, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Sketch Plan. The Planning Commission generally like the plans, and believed it was an improvement from the previous proposal. (See the attached minutes for specific comments.) ATTACHMENTS: • Draft minutes from the August 22, 2012 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Memo, August 22, 2012 Motion Comm moved to recommend Site Plan app findings and subje to staff conditions including Chuck Rickart of WS ommissioner Forrest sei Commissioner Schroeder s?Nmested an screening of the transformer, Nuring with the relocation of the trash efMosL Commissioners Scherer and For re Ayes; Scherer, Forrest, carried. VII based on staff ption B as provided by motion. to the motion to include the d4of top mechanicals are screened, along and that all conduits are masked. that amendment. Grabiel. Nay; Staunton. Motion Kathy Alexander tgW the Commission with regard to N transformer that State Code requires an op ng on one side of the transformer for a ss and that all electrical boxes, conduits ar&^sitioned on the wall; however, they will be p ' ted to match the building. ioner Platter requested that the transformer be screenedom the lot and not the Alexander agreed. �' VII. REPORTS A. Sketch Plan, Mount Properties, 6500 France Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission was asked to consider a new sketch plan proposal to redevelop the property at 6500 France Avenue. Teague noted the Planning Commission recommended approval of a previous proposal for a total build out of six stories; however, the applicant withdrew the request, prior to the City Council taking final action. Teague explained that the revised plan proposes a one phase 5 -story building with the mechanical equipment to be located inside the building. The overall height would not exceed the height of the mechanical equipment on the roof of the previously proposed four -story building. Teague said the specific proposal is to tear down the existing office building and build a new five -story medical office building with retail use on the first level. The parking ramp would be attached to the building. The site plan and building are generally similar to the previous plan; access to the site would remain from 65thStreet, with a secondary right out on France. Teague explained that some of the differences in the proposed plans from the previous plans include the following: Page 8 of 11 ➢ Five (5) -story building with no roof top mechanical equipment, 62 feet tall. (Previous building was six (6) stories and measured 88 feet to the top of the mechanical equipment.) ➢ Attached parking ramp. ➢ 5 -level parking ramp. (Previous ramp was 4- levels.) ➢ Proposed building has a rounded grand building entry appearance at 65th & France. (Previous building had a traditional sharp building corner at 65th and France.) ➢ Green roof on top of the building. (Previous plan had a green roof only on the two building podiums.) Planner Teague concluded that the applicant would again like to request a rezoning of this site from Planned Office District -1, (POD -1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). Appearing for the Applicant Stephen Michals, Mount Development Co. and Ed Farr, Edward Farr Architects, and Mr. Bernardi, property owner. Applicant Presentation Stephen Michals addressed the Commission and said he was very enthusiastic about the architectural changes that occurred to the building as the result of this revision. With graphics Michals highlighted the changes: • Reduced building height down from 89 feet to 62 feet • Elimination of the basement level of the parking garage to allow for basement mechanical room • Upgrade in building fagade • Inclusion of a green roof on the roof top vs. the green on the podium roof • Extensive landscaping and screening. • Redesign of the parking ramp that will better complement the office fagade. • The corner and front of the building has been enhanced to better serve pedestrians and address France Avenue. Concluding, Michals said one change that they are proud of is the rounded corner of the building. Michals explained that the building corner was rounded and "pushed back" to create an upgraded corner design that enhances the pedestrian experience. The corner plaza seating area will also include decorative surfacing treatment and protective bollards behind the curb to protect pedestrians. Page 9 of 11 M Discussion Commissioners expressed their support for the project as presented; noting with each revision the project gets better. Commissioners expressed pleasure with the redesign of the loading zones, handicap access, ramp and building alignment, green roof, better presence on France Avenue, better outdoor space and improved interior vehicle circulation including the one way out (south bound) entrance onto France Avenue. Some concern was expressed that the project maybe too aggressive market wise, noting the first phase of the previous plan was for a 4 -story building with the potential for a "build out" of two (Z) more stories if the market was strong. In response, Mr. Bernardi acknowledged there is risk in the build out at 5- stories; however, the team will work hard to fill the additional square footage. Chair Grabiel commented that in his opinion this is a very important corner and project for the City. Commissioners thanked the development team for their revisions; reiterating it's an improved project. Page 10 of 11 CITY OF MEMO City Hall • Phone 952 - 927 -8861 4,9jN�1ll„ Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com e v � �o tea. Date: August 22, 2012 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 6500 France Avenue The Planning Commission is asked to consider a new sketch plan proposal to redevelop the property at 6500 France Avenue. (See property location on pages Al —A2.) The previously proposed plan for a two phase, 4 -6 story building was to be denied by the City Council. (See attached City Council minutes on pages A47 —A48.) The Council did not support the height of a six story building. The applicant withdrew the request, prior to the City Council taking final action. The revised plan proposes a one phase 5 -story building with the mechanical equipment to be located inside the building. The overall height would not exceed the height of the mechanical equipment on the roof of the previously proposed four -story building. The specific proposal is to tear down the existing office building and build a new five -story medical office building with retail use on the first level. The parking ramp would be attached to the building. (See the applicant's revised narrative, building rendering and site plan on pages Al 6—A46.) The site plan and building are generally similar to the previous plan; access to the site would remain from 65thStreet, with a secondary right out on France. Some of the differences in the proposed plans from the previous plans include: ➢ Five (5) -story building with no roof top mechanical equipment, 62 feet tall. (Previous building was six (6) stories and measured 88 feet to the top of the mechanical equipment.) ➢ Attached parking ramp. (Previous ramp was detached.) ➢ 5 -level parking ramp. (Previous ramp was 4- levels.) ➢ Proposed building has a rounded grand building entry appearance at 65th & France. (Previous building had a traditional sharp building corner at 65th and France.) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO ➢ Green roof on top of the building. (Previous plan had a green roof only on the two building podiums.) The applicant would again like to request rezoning of this site from Planned Office District -1, (POD -1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD): This property. is, located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within=the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A4.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, ``A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Regional Medical — RM." Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan designation. The Council did not#ind that a small area plan was required with the previous request. The compliance table on the following page demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the POD -1 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone these:sites to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and number of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. Please note that several of the City Standards are not met, under: conventional zoning. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 MEMO ,r�. to Compliance Table i *Would require Variances if no PUD City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard Proposed (PCD -1) Buildinq Setbacks Front — France Avenue 62 feet 25 & 35 feet* Front — 65th Street 62 feet 25 & 35 feet* Side — West 62 feet 100+ feet Rear — South 62 feet 30 feet* Parkinq Structure Setbacks Front — France Avenue 52 feet 80+ feet Front — North 52 feet 25 feet* Side — West 58 feet 15 feet* Rear — South 58 feet 20 feet* Building Height Four Stories or 48 Five Stories & 62 feet* feet whichever is less Parking Ramp Height 48 feet 4 -5 levels & 40 -52* north side 4 -5 levels & 46 -58 feet* south side Building Coverage 30% 59 %* Maximum Floor Area 50% 100 %* Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls 548 — Based on 428* proof of parking 95,478 s.f. medical to 544* (27 doctors) and 7,000 s.f. general retail Parking Stall Size 8.5'x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet *Would require Variances if no PUD City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Per Section 850.04. Subd. 4 D provides the following regulations for a PUD: MEMO w'9jN� \rte tbn tw'� 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO 49jN�, A o e tk ,, J 0 • �tbn�M'� n 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. As with the last proposal, this development would be a huge improvement over the existing buildings and uses on the site. The building would be pulled up to the street, and provide a more defined street corner on 65th and France. The revised plans have been improved on the corner. With limited retail on the first level, including a coffee shop, there would be opportunity for greater activity along the street. Through the use of the PUD zoning, the city could provide protections in ensuring that the building proposed is actually constructed. Similar to the last proposal, staff is supportive of the request. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 7 ' nfb d11a fm 4236 6118 47/d 4111 6172 a V 4119 am t11r 4776 4114 6htl City of Edina 61M 6110 - 6111 8730 6311- _I�tri 011 6127 c7r4 fills G1�01M � 7120 E1D4 8 � +ac iJ/J BJ6I '6706 ��*" i, Cs :� jril it I +116 �d8 i bur! Qi17 e]f1 6213 gjr2 7 h l2ll I dS71 6271 QN 6117 6716 ] 6317 6811 ! I.� - /•'I 6317 6>7a aTe6 +107 632" .11s 1 6819 6315 6312 4t'0. 633b 6]11 B]7] obw ,J,3 0 4717 -� C4a1 em+3rlr__ .- _ M5 �y Y �s15 i.caland Pa,h x. °�N 6577 `1 ?rN '! 6575 •. :\ 1 5543 11 1414 "T _ r- • - a� AY17 MiPr6� 1. ]581 lit% �6�9• , i a i 41, .. ' _ kJ 0't w•s LJ 6.TJ7 is a—qa =7 6C'+fief PI ®:3002824140008 6500 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 1 Logand Haufs Nambeflabels 9beel Name Labels .l Cry Limits 'Al Cooks DLake Names Olakes IDParks Zening C3 . UO0 -ilUa , D - 'ap,ravt 0 ' I . t1LD -61 �,awaxo>r.a, Utr ,I ■ PC8- 11P'S..crCamPacs0.slrc�l ■ PCe- :l7vsscl C:.r_�eUtlR�1 aP(D1PSreca bd.atrd D:YkI O Paf1lPb.cf gfb�D"a4+c1) O POBd1Pb.cf 4]T OAfi 11 O me Ilph -, P-I-.W oil —I E] PRf-21PL sm Rend QO:sUal "m-lyph. MRs'esnd omrrsl a TT+IisIPCn.es a.sd:n�tl'x4ac11 ® PRO- 11PSm.:d RC�I�nbii! -aNi�1 . Pf AIPW.cdS —wtb 1 0.-135 eSawY.'�yU 11 ■ ri- 2S6-+.s:aRxaaOde O 0.3fai0.aliolstdie Oa..-1 Parcels 2DDSAAnal Ph.W -.. for living, learning, raising families & doing business %1IM 20,08 Comprehensive Plan Figure 4.3 e City of Edina Future Land Use Plan 2808 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: U R S Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 1 ,� Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -25 0 e ..fob living, learning, raising families & doing business %% 2008 Comprehensive flan Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Mixed Use Guidelines Guidelines Categories RM Hospitals, medical and dental Form -based design Regional Medical offices and clinics, and standards for building Floor to Area laboratories for performing placement, massing Ratio - Per medical or dental research, and street -level current diagnostic testing, analytical or treatment. Zoning Code: clinical work, having a direct Pedestrian circulation maximum of relationship to the providing of and open space 1.0 health services. General office amenities should be uses are permitted. provided for larger sites. OSP Applies to major parks and Performance and N/A Open Space and protected open space that is buffering standards Parks publicly owned. May not include for intensive outdoor all small parks, since some are recreation, parking. included in residential land use districts. PSP Applies to schools, large Performance and To be Public /Semi - Public institutional uses (churches, buffering standards determined - cemeteries) and semi - public uses for intensive outdoor may require such as country clubs. Some recreation, parking. review of small uses of these types may be large -scale integrated into other land use development districts. or institutional expansion LAH Expressways and access ramps NA NA Limited Access for two regional arterial Highway highways (TH 62 and TH 100) occupy land within the City to serve local and regional travel needs. *Floor -to -area ratio, or FAR, refers to the ratio of a building's floor area to the size of its lot. Thus, an FAR of 1.0 could mean a two -story building covering 50% of the lot; a 3 -story building on one -third of the lot, etc. Potential Areas of Change Among its many purposes, the Comprehensive Plan functions as a long range tool that attempts to anticipate where change and growth will occur in the City. Identifying those potential areas of change is an initial stage in the process of guiding new construction and redevelopment when it is proposed by private property owners. It is not ari attempt to stimulate change, but to acknowledge that it may occur and be proactive in shaping it. Locations identified in this section appear to be areas where change may occur during the life of this Plan. Many of these areas were identified in a group exercise at Public Meeting #2 as Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 ? Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design) 4 -30 J ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business ' : �I I /r`% 2008 Comprehensive Plan r a City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Date ofAeriel Photogiaphy: August 2006 Figure 4.4 Conceptual Land Use Framework: Potential Areas of Change F-L-F-L-F-I 0 0.5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design �� 4 -33 4 - 7'e -- �...for- living, learning, raising families & doing business >i: 2008 Comprehensive Plan) between offices and residential buildings. Edinborough is linked with the Centennial Lakes project by a network of pedestrian greenways. The following guidelines are directed toward creating successful mixed use environments. (Also see the' citywide standards for movement patterns, public spaces and built form earlier in this section.) Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. Movement Patterns. ,f • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and ;i �►. connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary- streets. • Encourage enhanced transit stops, including shelters, shade and seating where feasible. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc). Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -47 tiz�w.,u .j 'Q m ... for livin g. learnin g, raising families & doing business� 2008 Comprehensive Plan 3. Improve Connectivity in Large -scale Superblock Development. Internal and external connectivity. As part of redevelopment or expansion of large -scale sites, reintroduce an internal local street and pathway network that connects through the site and to suitable entry points at the perimeter. The goal is to encourage pedestrians to reach the site and drivers upon arriving to continue all further movement by foot. As a result, the capacity of internal roads can be reduced and more area devoted to amenities, providing still more incentives to walk. Bicycle facilities should allow residents in surrounding neighborhoods to bike safely to the site. Transit stops should be provided in visible and central locations. "Edge" or transitional uses. Moderately sized encouraged to soften the edge of large -scale superblock development. Medium - density housing types such as townhouses combined with structured parking may also be an appropriate transitional use. 4. Provide appropriate transitions between land uses. Rather than discouraging movement between adjacent land uses with liner buildings should be berms and fences, focus on creating elegant and attractive transitions between adjacent uses. Transitional areas include well - landscaped pedestrian walkways, seating areas, arcades, and other spaces that encourage public use, rather than separation. 5. Buildings Frame the Street. Building placement and heights can serve to define the streetscape and visually reduce the apparent width of the street. Generally speaking, wider streets can accommodate taller buildings subject to the height limitations described elsewhere in this Chapter. 6. Fagade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well - defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks or similar techniques. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -48 - - - - - -- - - -- - �u a M,� -- - - -- -- -- G. for living, learning, raising families & doing business ��� `4, 2008 Comprehensive Plan 1 7. Transparency and Natural Surveillance. Building forms and facades should provide an awareness of the activity within the buildings through frequent doors and windows oriented toward public streets and open space. 8. Variety of Building Forms. Encourage an integrated mix of building types, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. 9. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks and public spaces. e C 10. Building Heights. The question of building height is particularly significant in a largely developed community, where any new building has the potential to block views or cast shadows on established neighborhoods and land uses. The design guidelines above, as well as the recommended building heights in Figures 4.6A, 4.6B, and 4.6C, provide general guidance for buildings that exceed the typical residential height of 2.5 stories: Edina already has many tall buildings, but not all of them provide the kind of transition outlined in Principle 9 above. Building height should be considered within the larger urban design context as illustrated in the photos below. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -49 r ru► M ..for living, learning, raising families & doing business a 2008 Comprehensive Plan I Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design _ • _ � , ,, � � :11.3 � t; ;� .� Al_a: -Inv r H `!'���rf( /�� +( f'{ I ti�1(�7{ . Al 4 -50 YoA. %.�. ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan 1 0 ati IrLaE r rraff -ic r 3city Because of the limited number of locations where tall buildings can be sited, and the need for sensitivity to surrounding uses, the following Height Maps have been established for those parts of the city with potential for higher density development. The maps were developed to specify the following height measurements: -mil 74 Podium Height: The "podium" is that part of the building that abuts the street, or that provides the required transition to residential neighborhoods, parks, and other sensitive uses. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design �� 4 -51 -4 Q ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan) Standard Height: This height measurement extends to the top of the building (building height is measured as specified in the Zoning Ordinance). `Podium height" building example Edina Conip Plan Update 2008 Aib Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4-52 Jf 17 FIF M-1 _. `Podium height" building example Edina Conip Plan Update 2008 Aib Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4-52 Future Land Use Plan with City Of Edn <a 014. Building Heights Southeast Qutdrarrt 2008 Comprehens'ive'Pla:n Update Figure d.68 Data Sa.wce: URS E) 0 —��. 1 1. . fl Air i At� hi � Page l of l 0 AppvtAmr .. EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA MAIRATWI 6500 France Avenue South PROJECT SUMMARY August 10, 2012 Our development team is looking forward to working with the City of Edina to obtain the necessary approvals for the Edina Medical Plaza. Everyone will strive to make this building an outstanding addition to this regional medical area. Development Team These professionals are local business owners that live in the community. Architect: Edward Farr Architects Long established firm that is strong on design concepts. Past projects include Normandale Lakes Office Park and Two Twelve Medical Center Civil Engineering: Alliant Engineering, Mark Rausch Developer: Mount Development Co., Stephen Michals Five medical buildings have been completed in the past 6 years for Ridgeview Medical Center. Owner: Aurora Investments, LLC, Luigi Bernardi Current medical building ownership; All "class A" buildings 7373 France Avenue, Edina 212 Medical Center, Chaska Multiple Buildings in Wisconsin Please contact Stephen Michals with any questions on this new building. n' a A4 Site Area = 102,965 sq ft / 2.34 acres Property Guided: RM Regional Medical, no change proposed Property Zoned: POD -1, proposed to P.U.D. Proposed Redevelopment: New Medical Office Building and Parking Ramp 5 stories, 102,478 gross sq ft / 96,500 rentable sq ft* with 4 level parking ramp. Proof of Parking, if needed — add 1 additional level (5 total) on parking ramp. *Not including partial basement mechanical equipment room. Proposed Occupancy: Medical Offices - 95,478 gross sq ft to 102,478 gross sq ft (93% - 100 %) Medical Retail - 7,000 gross sq ft to 0 gross sq ft (7% - 0 %) Total - 102,478 gross sq ft (100 %) Proposed Parking: Levels 1 - 4 = 428 stalls 4.17/1000 gsf Proof of Pkq: 1 add'I level = 116 stalls 5.30/1000 qsf Total possible parking = 544 stalls Building Setbacks: Med Office Bldg Parking Ramp North 254"735' -0 " ** 25' -0" South 30' -0" 20' -0" East 264735' -0 " ** 225' -0" West 226' -0" 15' -0" ** 35' -0" setback is above podium level Overview: Our newly revised submittal reduces the height of the medical building down from 89 ft (six stories bldg plus HVAC equipment) down to 62 ft (five story building without rooftop HVAC *). Note that our new five story / 62 ft bldg height is comparable in height to the previous submittal's Phase I / four story building height (including HVAC equipment); since the City Council recommended that we shouldn't build taller than that Phase 1 / four story proposal. Another difference in this submittal is that the project will no longer be 'phased'; we intend to construct the entire five story building all at once. The building area remains similar, with our F.A.R. slightly below the 1.0 maximum identified for this Regional Medical District. To reduce the number of stories from six to five, we increased the size of each floor plan westward, towards the parking ramp, leaving room underneath for our service drive on grade. Also per the City Council's suggestion, we eliminated the basement level of our parking ramp, and raised that level up above grade. The cost savings of eliminating that basement parking ramp level help offset some of the excess development costs that we are spending on the office fagade, green roof, office basement mechanical room, and other upgraded features included in our proposal. The parking ramp will be constructed at four levels / 428 stalls to meet our anticipated parking demand. However, the ramp is expandable by one more level (adding 116 cars) for a total of five levels / 544 cars in the unlikely event that more parking is required (proof -of- parking compliance). Planning Concept: As per our earlier application, joining the two parcels (6500 France & 4005 W 65th St) offer many advantages to the site layout. We are still adopting an urban, pedestrian - friendly, streetscape along France Ave by bringing the building forward to the street; as well as incorporating a 'podium' design effect by setting the building back above 2nd floor to maintain a comfortably - scaled pedestrian experience. The streetscape includes: saving the many large over -story trees along the right -of -way, a 10 ft wide sidewalk and decorative planters that contain colorful plantings (annuals, perennials and low evergreen shrubs). Vehicular ingress is available at two driveways along 65th St W.; and vehicular egress is available at three points from the site, dispersing the traffic more effectively. The main public vehicular entrance off of W 65th St leads to a visitor entry drop -off circle at the front door, as well as a dedicated delivery area / loading zone for the building. Building Design: The building design will be an attractive facade using multiple colors of face brick, warm -toned architectural precast concrete wall panels with a variety of surface finishes, reflective bronze -tone Low -e glass in champagne painted aluminum frames and a small amount of EIFS decorative cornice trim. The main entrance located off of W 651h St serves as a visitor drop -off area for patients, and features a distinctive glazed crown with backlighting at night. The NE building corner at France Ave and W 65th St is still an important point of identity for the building, and has been redesigned with the upgraded corner design treatment as suggested in earlier city reviews. The corner plaza area will offer outdoor seating, and also coordinates with the City's initiative to upgrade the pedestrian experience at these corners. The plaza will have decorative surfacing treatment and protective bollards behind the curb to protect pedestrians. Visual Screening for the Adjacent Properties: We will supplement the already mature landscape buffer between Point of France and our site with new coniferous trees and over -story trees along our south yard. The ash trees along this borderline with Point of France are approx. 35'— 50' tall, providing excellent screening for most months of the year. On the west, we will be improving the visual screening buffer for the apartment occupants by adding more evergreen and deciduous trees there. The existing outdoor trash dumpsters will be placed inside a dedicated trash & recycling room, screened from public view. Parking: The ramp has been re- designed slightly to better complement the office facade with a compatible multi - colored architectural precast concrete facade. We are proposing to build four levels / 428 cars initially, which we feel will serve the building based on our experience. Later, if demand requires, we could build one more ramp level (Level 5 / 116 more cars), for a total possible parking count of 544. However, we are promoting many forms of alternative transportation in order to reduce conventional car parking demand; refer to our list at the end of this narrative. This will be a Pay -Park facility, similar to the Fairview Southdale Hospital ramp. Up to 10% of the parking may be compact car size; but we have not yet shown striping for these smaller stalls on our plan. New to our application is the alignment of the parking ramp levels to the medical building floors, in order to offer convenient pedestrian / wheelchair access from most levels of the ramp directly into the building. Required Parking - w/ Retail option: Retail, 1st Floor - 7,000 GSF: 8/1000 + (6/1000 X 6000 GSF) = 44 Stalls Medical Office - 95,478 GSF: 1/200 + 1/3500 (Doctors) = 504 Stalls Total Required Parking = 548 Stalls Required Parking - no Retail: Medical Office - 102.478 GSF: 1/200 + 1/3500 (Doctors) = 542 Stalls Total Required Parking = 542 Stalls Provided Parking: Levels 1 - 4 Ramp 428 Level 5 Ramp (proof of pkg) 116 Total Possible 544 h'iz Sanitary Sewer and Watermain: The existing properties located at 4005 65th St. W. and 6500 France Ave So. are currently encumbered by two public utilities; an existing 12" ductile iron water main and 12" ductile iron sanitary sewer in the south quarter of the property. The existing water main and sanitary sewer referenced serve other properties and thus the continuity of those mains is required. A second 8" sanitary sewer line is located within the boundary of both properties but that line is in use only by the two existing buildings and thus does not need to remain if the proposed project is constructed. The existing 12" sanitary sewer along the southern property line of the 6500 France Ave property will remain as is. The proposed development does not require any modification to that line. The proposed plan is to construct a new sanitary service wye in the existing line to provide an 8" service to the new building. The existing 8" sanitary service line to the 4005 building will be 'cut off' at the west side of the proposed parking ramp and will then be connected to the parking ramp for servicing the floor drains in the lower level of the ramp. The existing 12" watermain loop cutting through the site will be relocated and re- routed to the north side of the properties. A new 12" main will be installed northerly along France Ave., then westerly just to the north of the proposed building and ramp to the western edge of the property, then southerly back to the existing watermain completed the new loop. It is currently proposed to directional bore install the northerly and southerly aligned watermain to avoid removal of the existing trees in those locations. The east to west watermain will be installed via direct bury as its proposed location can be installed without removal of the existing trees along W 65th St. An 8" water service is proposed from a tee off the re- routed 12" watermain just north of the proposed building entrance. The proposed building service will enter the building in the corner west of the main building. entrance. A new hydrant is proposed in the central entrance area of the new building off the proposed 8" service line. Stormwater Management: The proposed stormwater management storage facilities proposed for the Edina Medial Plaza project meets the requirements of Nine Mile Creek Watershed and the City of Edina. The three primary requirements that have been met are: 1. Volume retention onsite equivalent to 1" of runoff over the entire proposed site impervious surface. (Accomplished via underground storage and filtration via perforated piping and rock bedding). 2. Water quality volume from entire site equivalent to runoff from 2" type II storm event and 25 year sediment storage. (Retention volume counts towards WQ volume and remainder accomplished via additional underground storage and filtration via perforated piping and rock bedding). 3. Discharge rate control shall be provided so the proposed conditions do not exceed existing conditions for the 2, 10, and 100 yr storm events. The proposed site plan reduces by 4.7% the amount of impervious surface and thus proposed discharge rates are decreased automatically. The proposed plan is to maintain the same point of stormwater discharge from the properties as is currently present. A private storm sewer collection system will be routed from north to south through the central portion of the site collecting the majority of site runoff. The storm sewer will drain to the proposed underground storage system at the southern end of the site which will ultimately overflow to the existing flared end that will then continue to drain southerly to the Point of France pond. �o Landscape Design Strategies: The landscape design provides a mix of over -story, coniferous and ornamental trees, shrubs and perennials to create a vibrant display of color and foliage. Four existing Honeylocust trees are to be preserved along France Avenue and eight of the boulevard Ash trees along W 65th St are also to be saved. Raised curbed planters are to be provided along France Avenue that will be planted with colorful, annual flowers. The perimeter of the Medical Office Building will be planted with a mixture of plant types to soften and compliment the building architecture. The parking ramp will be screened by existing and proposed conifers on the west and south sides. The diversity of plantings will provide color variety and year round interest. In addition, the project is proposing to provide a green roof system on top, covering approximately 1/3 of our roof. This sustainable initiative will help reduce the heat island effect, reduce stormwater runoff quantity, as well as providing a nicer view down on our roof from the residents of Point of France building. Site Lighting: Decorative wall mounted lighting along France Av and W 65th St frontages, and around the main entry area; metal halide pole lights on top of the parking ramp with low - height, sharp cutoff features to eliminate light spill off our property. Site Signage: Building name / address at corner of France & W 65th St., and address above front entry. Possible tenant names on fagade based on City code. Directional signs at both entries along W 65thSt. Hours of Use: Normal Business Hours anticipated. Possible retail tenants at street level with extended and /or weekend hours. Zoning: Planned Office District 1 (POD -1), proposing to PUD, due to variances requested for building setbacks, building height and Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.). Green Building Practices: Throughout all phases of the project - Design, Construction and Operation, we will use best practices of environmental awareness. All clinics and vendors will be educated on Reduce - Recycle -Reuse operations. We have a Green Building Practices Narrative with our submission. New to our proposal is the inclusion of two green roof areas at podium level where our building fagade steps back. Community Benefits from the New Project Our application is for a new five level medical office building. The 6500 France building and 4005 W. 65th Street buildings will be removed. Both law firms will relocate in the community and retain the current jobs. 2. This site provides outstanding visibility for medical clinics offering service to our community and support to the regional medical presence of the SW suburbs. This is consistent with the City Guide Plan of medical buildings along France Avenue which is an address easily recognized for patients. 3. The building is sized to have a critical mass of providers to allow cross referrals among . the clinics. This is a key factor for the success of each clinic. 4. Edward Farr Architects are known for creating special building design features. This building is more than a traditional medical building. The focal point will be the glass and brick detail of the main entry corner. Numerous surface changes occur on each side of the building to create interest and shadow elements. City code specifies brick and glass. 5. We are striving to create a pedestrian environment along France Avenue with extensive flower gardens. TangleTown Gardens is the designer of these features, and their passion for unique colorful plants is shown in the enclosed photos. Colored concrete walks and accent lighting will make this area a pleasant visual experience. 6. Green Building Practices will be implemented for the three phases: building design, construction phase and long term operation of the clinics. The General Contractor has compiled a summary of the Green Practices we will pursue for each phase of the project. 7. The adjacent 4005 W. 65th land parcel will be included for a consistent regional medical master plan. This took substantial effort and negotiation with the building owner. 8. A portion of the building roof will have a vegetated green roof, to enhance the view down onto the roof from the neighboring Point of France building, as well as reducing our heat island effect and improving our stormwater runoff quantity. 9. There will be ongoing seminars with the clinics to evaluate methods and new technology for their clinics — Reduce consumption, Re -use materials, and Recycle waste. The benefit to the building will be reduced operating expenses and good stewardship of our business resources. 10. Alternative transportation is a key element of any project. A tangible goal will be to reduce the number of cars coming to the building which will reduce the parking stalls required to service the clinics. We have provided several successful alternate transportation systems: Designated premium parking spaces for "smart cars" Scooter, motorcycle, bike parking will be an enclosed space that is secure, well lit, and air tempered. We want these employees or patients to know they are recognized for their efforts. Employees may participate in the ZAP chip monitor system which will provide a monthly printout of number of rider days. There will be a calculation of carbon footprint poundage saved to each participant. Hour Car business has been evaluated for rental cars parked in the ramp. The established bus system will support the need around the hospital and shopping center- for -the hourly car rental. The MTC #6 bus line services multiple stops within 1 block of the building. Additional routes around Southdale are 515, 538, 539, 578, 579, 684. See the attached graphic 11. The estimated real estate taxes will be over two times the current revenue. The two existing buildings pay $144,000 and the fully assessed medical building will likely pay in excess of $380,000. dd 7 fcZ 12. There will be over 70 new medical staff positions in the building. In addition, there will be 40 -60 construction jobs over 12 months. 13. Storm water management will be improved through rate control and water quality, including our green roof. The current site has direct, unrestricted runoff. There is 8% less hard surface area in the new plan than the current buildings, which mean more green space for the community. 14. The current buildings have substantial deferred maintenance. The building exterior, landscaping and parking lot are ready for redevelopment. 15. The new development is using existing utilities and roads in the community. Urban planning considers this good stewardship to reuse existing sites with current infrastructure. 16. The new building exterior has been enhanced over code to create a significant Gateway image on this corner. - A focal point is the W 65th Street pedestrian corner - Detailed brick design on all four sides - Accent lighting along public street frontages - Special landscaping from Tangletown Gardens 17. Every business has a carbon footprint. We will provide information to each clinic to establish a "Carbon Impact Analysis." For the first two years we plan to have seminars for clinic managers discussing ways to reduce their impact and manage more efficiently. PayitGreen Company has set the model to challenge companies to purchase local products to reduce paper correspondence and conserve operational materials. 18. Ramp Enhancements - All columns are clad in architectural precast panels - Architectural features add interest and shadow lines - Three colors and finishes to the precast panels create a variety of textures 19. The entrance traffic circle will have an area for a significant piece of art on the center area. We are planning a special commissioning for this feature. Final comment for the approval of the proiect The building size at 102,478 sq ft over five stories is very important to create a successful project. Market rents set the overall budget. We are projecting rents to be 20% higher than other buildings in area to absorb the land cost. Redevelopment is difficult when you are purchasing two older buildings. The value for the Developer on the acquisition of the two older buildings is the land. The viability of the development is based on the approval of the 102,478 sq ft project. Thank you for your review and consideration of this project. We are ready to move forward on this outstanding new medical building which will be an enhancement to your Regional Medical Area. 4J� TO: Carey Teague FROM: Stephen Michals RE: Narrative Edina Medical Building DATE: August 15, 2012 We would like to make the following clarifications and highlights to our plans: 1. There are metal screens in the opening of the ramp in the following i areas: South Side: All openings West Side: All openings East Side: None North Side: Vertical openings only; none on horizontal This is shown on the plans as color changes from light to dark brown. 2. All green roof foliage is on the top roof area only. 3. Light pole heights have been reduced. Aa7 Table of Contents Regional Map Existing Conditions Photos Colored Site Plan Rendering of Main Entry Rendering ofPad —g Ramp Entry Rendering of View fron Northeast Comer Rendering ofvew from Southeast Comer Rendering of View from Southwest Comer Rendering ofvew from Northwest Comer Rendering ofNorthwestAmal Pedestrian Sidewalk/ Podium Setback Building Height Comparison Planting Concepts Building Height Comparison - Comelia Place Apartments Building Height Comparison - Fairview Southdale Hospital Building Height Comparison - Point offrance Building Height Comparison - Southdale Medical Center Building Height Comparison - Southdale Office Centre Building Height Comparison - Twin City Orthopedics Bus Routes Zap and Bike File Hour Car and Smart Expressions 41.7 �Ift- 6500 France Avenue 1 i ■ I Re- Zoning Submittal ,.� it �- f'T�„_,�"- �"�,��•� I �'LII __ p I/I s k i August 10, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL, PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC MO UNTDCVELOPMUNTCO. Existing Conditions em ♦ Al ar Alar-MANTIThIMAW.MWE MrS I Rrmift�, 7 View from Southeast showing 6500 F cq....,, Au � �--1(0, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC I F: E DINA MEDICAL PLAZA MOUNT DEVELOPMENT =111-W 9Lj - I 'M z —.W'64th St f Hw.y-62----_- mas m v win Cities Crall— 7. 7 Lit Fairview South'dale 4 U-7 oil 5 I le- E ini *AV— wilt QV-* bouthdalerMedical cent W11 4 so rr"O NO v m llips Alo '79 nn't M x lk tj At' w 1%% Wk, m' IM, pdr it v lit. Ail A, V- August 10, 2012 APARTMENT BUILDING 2J J Site Plan POND 6500 France Ave EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC FS HOSPITAL RAMP .�; EST- EAST _ rT _ IN EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA }. 00000ao[ 2 I Ik LIGHT TURN` iXIT ONLY l August 10, 2012 WOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. _ - A�.r,.�, raw� �- �- -- _ mall LA W J�lo.. ! At - 6 Main Entry �,� M$ 2012 EDWARD Faxx EDINA MEDICAL P �--� ARCHITECTS INC MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. NOW low -OWN Saba.. 1 1 Parking Ramp Entry EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC - - -. pia, � _, W4, =i. 77 A OIL' 10, 2012 EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA NIOUNTDEVELOPMENTCO. Y, � - � �' � J' LIJ ' _*114`- L`a -'i i - ... ` ..'J ~` • _ Y 1' - �_ a� �' y � \!. �c�� �I __ I,.7r. ils'� "" !t +•.. -J{,n. {- .X -z}'s Z .. '• _ ��1 �.'+� q� !� � -! •�;.y'Z�lil 'i i'!, ` � I" �.� - t '�� �S,i ••4 t-�'�; y.������k? �, f e ��, Of NJ 1 161, Ll All View from Northeast Comer s - August 10, 2012 EDWARD FARR L. EDINA MEDICA PLAZA — ARCHITECTS INC MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. � ' I � w � ■ � [ ak . � '�- ' 1 iy l`. w'� i Xt=`'_ 'e � • �,`t?f,� < �,t(;. � ` • � e: �,�� } r,j' 1 ry j.l el �� r '� r yr'.. may^. 'IlT,jj III �i �.. }j��"°".77�� t -. r �r ? x y � ��j.// �, ' t�_ •'a± :1 t" r - - _. - _ • - "' ^tip' +}4.Lk ���t ~� 1 ,; _�'+4�z '} • F � 1� "'9f - -" ' 3 'Y. t •y� t�+s' -�'\. - _ 1 r -_ — -_� ;�� -.:_ .L �/ Sly ����' • FT.L � y = 1 "/�- � is .../tiny — .,'•4. !{� 7 � .? ��' -- �-_. �•" _�_t •.�(, iY' ,.1e.1.• i'_" V '� _ • � :;•� - � A • w. r - VI_!e �.+� _ _ _ __ 1 dr. :'e ��1• -�.��! will 1t� j'�I _ I View from Southeast Comer �� - August 10, 2012 EDWARD FARR ----------------- EDINA MEDICAL P n-,- ARCHITECTS INC -� MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. View from Southwest Comer EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC 'j, I---------------- EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA August 10, 2012 /\--I- MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. View from Northwest Comer EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC --------------- EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA- August 10, 2012 MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. 6.6 0-1`141-t� --------------- EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA- August 10, 2012 MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. . . . ....... Pill a VON 4-111 --Az 4- 00� .00 00 �00 io 9c JK io 4-W � Y-5- 7L Northwest Aerial EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA I A August 10, 2012 /N-'- MOUNT DEVELOPl1E�'I' Co. � 'I 10.5' Additional building setback for "Podium Effete' which visually shields upper stories Existing Honeylocust trees to remain Architectural wall lighting 5' wide raised planting area for annuals, perennials and low shrubs see TangleTown Gardens detail page n Pedestrian sidewalk at France Avenue looking south EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC Possible coffee shop seating.- - L■■■■■ ■ " ICI ■ NMI ■ MINIM ■ ■ ' _ s ■ 1 ItIIII M �.■ mm■ ■� _ - ilm r -- �� ■ . ■ �� ■ EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA August 10, 2012 MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. i i 7,L M1011"NON va 7,�■ ■ ■i ■■■ ■ ■� ■■� I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I ■■■ ■ ■ ■I IMI 1■ W MV LN ,- =I w -n,� , Phase 1: 4 Story with RTU's Proposed: 5 Story w/o RTU's (Previous Submittal) 1-80 o I Building Height Comparison August 10, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA - b1OUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. it Planting Concepts for public sidewalk planter areas 6500 France Ave. Dean Engelmann & Scott Endre, Principals Olivia Spyra, Landscape Designer W 7 6500 France Ave. Medical Plaza Dean Engelmann & Scott Endre, Principals Olivia Spyra, Landscape Designer Edina. Medical Plaza. Comelia Place Apartments 0111 ... ■ G - J,.II ■�� ^ r 0 r 71 ■{ ■ ■ �■ 4 Y:j F - �31 ... 11 rte® !r1 ; _ r, rla�, �! �� _ -4r K If r.tf , 1 - -y-..— .�. .. _..� � �'. -._ 9 �. y�i��_a... . �•k4+.�s.�.��:!V�V...,r_' -..-.s _� iW4,?+�.i _:;. ._ -.y� .y..rs.. 6500 France Avenue South 4105 W 65th Street 5 Stories - 62' 4 Stories - 79' (4 level building including gable roof) C-1-4 Building measurements to the highest point August 10, 2012 - EDWARD FARR EDINA M EDIT PLAZA = ARCHITECTS INC \IIOUNT DGVCLOPhIEN'C CO. Edina Medical Plaza le�A�ii'i'i■ii'iiG� 0 NO W-0 1ii 3 iNow ■ ■ ■ ■ Rai Via- � _ ■ 6500 France Avenue South 5 Stories - 62' Building measurements to the highest point Fairview Southdale Hospital 1 ' r s l o w a l l l ■ a ■ . ■ ■ ■ iiiiiiiiii / w � � f s 6401 - 6405 France Avenue South 4 & 8 Stories - 124' LZ V h � August 10, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA ARCHITECTS INC MEDICAL PLAZA MOUNT UEVELOPMEN'r CO. Edina Medical Plaza. Point of France r' Fr ` AV ' _ •: WA 6500 France Avenue South 6566 France Avenue South 5 Stories - 62' 13 Stories - 123' . - ..� -------/T3 v, - Building measurements to the highest point August 10, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA �--� -= ARCHITECTS INC MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. Edina Medical Plaza. 1QOAAO? ®i�iii 'Miii row aWaa iiii 6500 France Avenue South 5 Stories - 62' Building measurements to the highest point Southdale Medical Center 6545 France Avenue South 6 Stories - 92' Cl u` c - - - �t August 0, 2012 EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA �-�-� _ b(OUNT UEVELOPML'NT CO. Edina Medical Plaza Southdale Office Centre ':I'iii'iii -�■�oiriiioii'iii� i armi :� *_ ,r -viii � ` / 'gyp, �` L z l n I A „ • 6500 France Avenue South 6600 & 6800 France Avenue South 5 Stories - 62' 6 & 7 Stories - 99' Building measurements to the highest point August 10, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC MOUNT ULYtiLOPbIL'NT CO. Edina, Medical Plaza. lien ElRrl O'�'i � i'■�:: � o o� i i i i i� i iii 6500 France Avenue South 5 Stories - 62' _.Ali Building measurements to the highest point Twin City Orthopedics :M - -- 3i day ei F. i 4010 West 65th Street 4 Stories - 82'& 85' August 10, 2012 EDWARD FARR EDINA ARCHITECTS INC MEDICAL, PLAZA MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. IE� r'• � t7�'r4L'P ��r ��2 y,• ,,• E62 Co!aria; ¢ c . 54th J I ;';i ii Diam s5cn i') Lake 5�tnt� I; J•' 4 l .6 . 1621 ._ .__r 4yr1 vIW Wood 'Augsi Lake Park 4, r Best Buy HQ , a2Mnit66IIiiJJ7a7aee1.h .�r �: Ep V9itaw.ISS6ssnaa�ianis ' 78th �y7 �l J N 4 ' X J uIvUUU'U qt r Bus Routes 76t MN School • i o Busines I ioza —• Y. © MetroTrandt 1 - G5 St V1 s S0o0dal♦ Medea) Bldg Slap ID. 1156 • Row. 4 -Sowll 2.65 SI W 6 Fairwewh o,wMI Sim ID: 4369 • Rowa 6 -Nonh 3.6561 W6 Dnw A.3 Slop ID! 1163 • Route 6 - Nodh 4 . France Av 9 a Nary 62 Stop ID: 47190 • Roule6 -NdM 5 -Ora.v M 3665 SIW slup ID: 49110 • Rowe 6 - Sown Rowe 5781Expressl- Swlh 6- Frwee M S 606314196316 Stop W: 44196 Rowe 6 • South 7 - 65 SI W s Valley VN•9 R6 Stop 10:$2554 R.I. 6•SOwh 8 - 65 SI W 3 Valley Vlew Rd Stop W; 52653 • Rowe 9 -NoM 9- V.Wy V1ee Rd d 65 44 314p ID: 1175 • Rauh 667 (Espreu) - Na ,0- F—It Av S 6 Hwy 62182 St W slop 16.47791 • Route 6 -N.M I I - France Av 5 6 46226 Sup ID. 4:197 • Rdwe 6 • Sown 12 - o6 S1 W & Draw Av S Slop ID: 4370 • Rowe 6- North 13. Val" VM7• Rd A 56 SI W Slop ID 1261 . RoM 587 tExprasf) - Sown W -Best. Rd 665SIW Stop iD'43e, • Rdrrts 5781Express) -NaM 15 -VA41 View Rd IL 66 Si W Slop J: 41099 • Ros" 587 tExpess). NOM 16 - Valley View Rd a Brook—AV SW b: 1177 • Rowd G -I4xpl • Ray1e 5671EsN4sa) -Monti 17 • Valley V.ew Rd 6l:uw.View Av Stop 10. 1279 • How.. - Sowl, • P-le •871Express) -Sown IB • Franco Av S 8 62 St W Slops and slop numbers U 71 - mown 140n fit If •w N U 1T 916 • y;ll 62 �; a 4 2l �T 1 J14 •21 ` pywulCEiR • 15 22 k m it W el 1 -12012 s V111,9c"k0l) 4.3 1!- No, 5c ucn Slop 90. 1250 us Roe 6 - Nml 19 -er—Av 6662 SI W Stop ID 1153 • Rndle 6 - S.Neh 20- Lane Rd 6 96417.6447 Stop 10: 4946 • Rowe SIB(Express) - Sdulh 21 -11-- Rd 6 46417.6447 Slop ID 4945 • Roos 576 (Expma). rbrin 22 - 66 SI Wit Dams Rd Slop 10.4365 • R.M 6. NeM • Rowe 618. W.9 23 • Vesely Vrw Rd & 68 St W Slop ID: 8134 • Row- 587lExprestt -North 24 -aetley View Rd 3 66 51 W 'top 10. 6135 • Rowe 5671Exwess) - Su dh 25 - France Av S 6 H.M. Av Slop ID- •4196 R--Nom 26 - France Ae S L Haws Av Slop ID'. 1152 • Rouse 6. Bowel ; J , General Information Why ZAP? _ Easy to Use An Ounce of Prevention Save the Planet Car Parking is Expensive How Does it Work? f rr I �. �r Ql�G —RCS I K E R A C K S � Www-derv.00wl E-3, I47M337. 1,729 Many organizations in the private, public and non- profit sectors want to promote commuting by bike as an environmentally friendly and healthful transportation alternative. To get bike commuting rolling they need a practical way to tally and manage bike trip data. Dero has the solution — Dero ZAP. Dero ZAP is a solar- powered, automated RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) system with integrated hardware and soflvvare. Via a web -based interface to the Dero ZAP system software, participants are enrolled and registered with a unique RFID tag.The tamper -proof tags are attached to the spokes of each participant's bike's front wheel. ZAP units mounted on steel poles around your campus identify registered bikes from up to 30 feet away. WWW.ciero.aov� kve'V.337 (,729 I' al} {`� PriN'tad a:. rccycicd I.:Il.er sJ .. Tile Bike File is our most space efficient u -lock compatible product. Sturdy sliding hangers allow nine bikes to be securely stored in an eight -foot section while allowing for easy loading and unloading of bikes. Ceiling mount, wall mount and floor mount options are available. ' WWW.�e.ro.00VVS LYJYl PJ337.(,729 Il ��� • � �.' � pr�atad a+. racycl.d Pnrar � 1 _ Car ownership is so yesterday. With HOURCAR you can reserve a car when you need it, drive it where you want to, let someone else worry about car payments, parking, insurance, gas, and maintenance, and be an environmental superstar. At the same time! HOURCAR is the smart way to drive. HOURCAR offers ^ ca i's 11—ti mat in Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Find out where your nearest HOURCAR lives, and sign un (join) to drive today. rj� _ :. army ; t� HOURCAR Co- �r Sppnsots "Reccncc of the Electric Car„ Sc•recuing ( /uu„e /•±ol V e2, 2011 n/ hnurc: u'• cn- woman•+}•, •rrnCr- rlcch;ic- c•v- arrrrninzl Novembr On Monday, November 14, HOURCAR is co- sponsorinfl necrd screenlnniene uo-.: :n .y;Ey;y�id]ut n. in, •,•nn,n of the new film Revenue o! the Electric Car e��n u:.:::v .a:�nn�.nne <• a „c. :e�,n,u= numl, the sequel to the hit documentary "Who Killed the Electric Carr Sponsored by Fresh Enenm.tto rnau,- =r -.,a. ago , this special event includes a pre - screening reception and a panel discussion after the film with director Chris Paine and Fresh Energy Executive Director Michael Noble. New Pllle- IIIFIOURCARs•IOIU . r ; « Saint Paul Fleet /rtlluc-houn•ar- i„in -c,i nl -1, ,rd- ne,�t1 October 4. 2011 smart open your mind. I ©rrt to alectrllc drive -next generation of smart V Member Swenson made a 'on, secon ember Sprague, to approve a new On -Sale and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for P.F. Ch ina Bistro, Inc. dba P.F. Chang's China Bistro, 2700 Southdale Center, for the period be ' g July 18, nd ending March 31, 2013. Ayes: Bennett , Sprague, Swenson, Hovlan VI.B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING BUILDING HEIGHT, PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD -1 TO PUD AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 4005 WEST 65TH STREET AND 6500 FRANCE AVENUE FOR MOUNT PROPERTIES — DENIED Assistant Planner Presentation Assistant Planner Aaker presented the request of Mount Properties to tear down the existing office buildings at 4005 West 65th Street and 6500 France Avenue to build a new six -story, 81 -foot tall, 102,406 square foot medical office /retail building with a podium height of two stories and detached five -level parking ramp. It was noted the project was proposed to be developed in two phases with the first phase construction of a four -story, 69,456 square foot medical office with a three -level detached parking ramp and the second phase construction of two levels to each structure. The site was located in a "Potential Area of Change" within the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Aaker described the approval process and indicated the Council was being asked to determine if a Small Area Plan was needed prior to rezoning. She concluded presentation of the application and enumerated the considerations before the Council. Ms. Aaker advised the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that a Small Area Plan was not needed in this case since the proposed use was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and recommended approval subject to conditions as detailed in the staff report. Proponent Presentation Luigi Bernardi, Aurora Investments, stated they were excited about this project and hoped it would be approved by the Council. Stephen Michals, Mount Development Company, commented on the review process and stated agreement with the staff report and recommendation. He noted this was a gateway location to the Southdale area, valuable land, and deserved a high profile building. Mr. Michals stated the adjacent land was purchased to provide better circulation, created relatively small floor plates on the sixth level building, and noted the five adjacent buildings were equal or greater in height as certified by Alliant Technologies. Edward Farr, Farr Architects, presented features of the site and landscaping plans as well as exterior building and parking structure elements. He advised that depending on the tenant mix, the fifth level of the parking structure might not be constructed. Mr. Farr indicated that phase one would be 54 feet in height to the cornice line. The phase two build out would have six stories and be about 1.5 floors above the tree line. Mr. Farr displayed and described the exterior building materials board. With regard to the height of Cornelia Place, Mr. Michals explained the view depicted in packet materials dated July 6 were taken from the curb line on Valley. The Council discussed the proposed project and asked questions of the proponents. Support was stated for the building design, drop off area, generous sidewalk width, corner pavilion area, proposed lighting, and upscale landscaping. Suggestions were made to assure the parking lot discouraged cut - through traffic, provide a public access off France Avenue leading to the internal corridor system, enhanced stormwater retention strategies since it was an impaired water body, and the option of a green roof. It was agreed that if approved, Metro Transit should be informed of the need for a stop at this location. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. Public Testimony Page 4 A 4 7 u Minutes /Edina City Council /July 17, 2012 Marilyn Kemme, 6566 France Avenue S., #1206, Point of France Association Board President, addressed the Council. John Windhorst, 6566 France Avenue S, #204, Point of France Association Board Member and Legal Chair, addressed the Council. Stacy Gallup, speaking on behalf of the 6500 France building owners, addressed the Council. Peter Pustorino, 4005 West 56th Street building owner, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Members Sprague, Swenson, and Bennett concurred that they would support a maximum building height of four stories, or 62 feet. However, they were unwilling to consider a Comp Plan amendment to allow for the proposed building height of six stories, or 81 feet in this caseSupport was also expressed to allow all parking levels to be constructed above grade to lower redevelopment costs. Member Brindle and Mayor Hovland advocated for the project as unanimously recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. That recommendation found a Small Area Plan was not needed and supported a Comprehensive Plan height amendment. It was noted adjacent buildings were taller than four stories, the proposed use was consistent with PUD to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design, and density was needed to accommodate high land costs. Mr. Michals explained that additional tenants would be required to trigger Phase 2 and due to the high land cost, the project was not feasible unless approved for six stories. Mr. Michals stated the project needed 102,000 feet floor to area ratio at 1.0 or else the high land costs could not be absorbed into the project. He noted the proponent had been forthright on that perspective from the beginning. Motion by Member Sprague, seconded by Member Swenson, directing staff to prepare a resolution, with the City Attorney's assistance, with findings for denial of the Comprehensive Plan amendment requested by Mount Properties. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson Nays: Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. Motion by Member Sprague, seconded by Member Swenson, directing staff to prepare a resolution, with the City Attorney's assistance, with findings for denial of the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan requested by Mount Properties. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson Nays: Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. VI.C. AGREEMPN4QF UNDERSTANDING WITH DRIVE FQWRE HIVE, LLC — APPROVED Director of Parks and Recreation ios pres the Hornets Nest Agreement creating apublic- private partnership for an estimated $3 millio ect. The Drive would donate $750,000 cash plus 25% of additional costs above $3 million. Th y wo ontribute $2,250,000 plus 75% of additional costs above $3 million. The project would a 26,450 sq. ft. ion to the north side of West Arena, lower level locker rooms, with a trai facility and retail on the u level. He displayed concept drawings and reviewed the terms a agreement, noting it would be con ned on the following: the City receiving Page 5 -%%,* �� , NA, we \,v \NCORPoil" 9� 1888 REPORURECO6V MEND TION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. A. DEBRA MANGEN ❑ Action From: CITY CLERK F] Discussion X Information Date: SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. RICHARD L. EVANS August 23, 2012 The Honorable James Hovland The Honorable Joni Bennett The Honorable Mary Brindle The Honorable Josh Sprague The Honorable Ann Swenson Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: Last weekend I attended a presentation at Good Samaritan United Methodist Church featuring Mr. David Cobb of the organization Move to Amend. This organization is dedicated to passing an amendment to the United States Constitution that would state, among other things, that "The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural persons only. " Mr. Cobb, an entertaining and engaging speaker, at one point opened his shirt front, pointed to his "belly button" and noted that under the amendment he promotes, only entities that had "one of these" would enjoy constitutional rights. ,Mr. Cobb advocates for this change due to his belief (which I do not share) that large "trans - national corporations" are already in control of our government and that this amendment to the Constitution would help end that. Mr. Cobb told the audience that his organization is seeking to have the Edina City Council endorse this proposal as it has been endorsed by the Minneapolis and St. Paul City Councils. I am writing to urge you to refrain from endorsing this ill- considered initiative. My objections to the proposed amendment to our Constitution could fill a book, but I will limit myself to a few points. In the course of his presentation, I asked Mr. Cobb whether NBC would lose its constitutional rights under his proposal. He seemed to say that they would, though he also said. that they would continue to enjoy freedom of the press. To seek clarification I asked him whether, under his amendment, Congress could pass a law forbidding any corporate -owned newspaper from endorsing the election or defeat of a candidate. He seemed to indicate that such a law would be valid under his amendment. After his presentation, several other supporters of the amendment approached me and said that they disagreed with his answer to my question. The confusion arises, I believe, because of the construction of his proposed amendment. The first section ,denies constitutional protection to entities who are not persons. The third section states: "Nothing in this amendment shall be construed to abridge. the freedom of the press. " In spite of Mr. Cobb's response to my question, some of the other amendment supporters felt this third section protected media corporations from restrictions on what they publish 'or broadcast. I think they are wrong and Mr. Cobb 4s correct. The freedom of the press exists and'is recognized in the Constitution and has been defined over the years in cases decided by the Supreme Court. Thus, freedom of the press, as a concept, is established and defined in our law. The first section of the proposed amendment does not, by its tetms, abridge, redefine or otherwise change the nature of any rights, but simply delineates who has standing to assert them. It does not seem to me that the third section re- grants standing to one who has none under the first section, though some of the amendment's supporters seem to think it does. More likely the amendment would simply result in the "unabridged" freedom of the press being available only to natural persons, which seemed to be Mr. Cobb's view. Given these diverse views, I am not sure anyone can be perfectly clear on how this all would be applied in the case of media companies. Yet that seems like a pretty important thing to be clear about. -2— August 23, 2012 Furthermore, even if section three of the proposal somehow re -vests constitutional rights in some corporations for the purpose of preserving freedom of the press, then the entire purpose of this exercise is significantly undermined. As you may know, NBC is owned jointly by Comcast and General Electric. ABC is owned by Walt Disney Corp. CBS is owned by National Amusements Corporation (a theater chain). If the proposed amendment is intended to limit the power of trans - national corporations, as Mr. Cobb asserts, it does a very poor job of it if it exempts the likes of GE and Walt Disney Corp. from its provisions. Indeed, if Mr. Cobb is correct and our government is controlled by large trans - national corporations, it seems like he has created an enormous loop -hole. Surely a large trans- national corporation bent on continuing its dominance of the United States government would have no problem acquiring or establishing a media corporation and exercising this exclusive "freedom of the press," while smaller companies, labor unions, associations and other legal entities lose all of their constitutional rights. And even those of us who do not subscribe to Mr. Cobb's view of the U.S. government must see that this "freedom of the press" loophole would be a fairly simple way for wealthy corporate interests to acquire significant rights that are denied to all other organizations. That is not a good result. A more important objection to the proposed amendment is that this destruction of constitutional rights for entities without "belly buttons" will have far - reaching and negative consequences of profound importance to our democracy. In fact, as one contemplates the rights that would be impacted by this proposed amendment, its ramifications can become pretty frightening. Keeping in mind that the Bill of Rights and other parts of the Constitution are essentially limits on government action, one can imagine some fairly serious consequences of unleashing government action on those private entities that are stripped of these rights. Suppose a state passed a law permitting the Governor to conduct random searches of the offices of public employee unions without obtaining a warrant. Today, the union (sans "belly button ") could go to federal court and assert its Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches. Under this proposed amendment, however, they would have no such right. Or suppose a state passed a law that forbid one major political party (but not the other) from spending any money communicating with potential voters. Today, the political party (again, sans "belly button") could go to federal court and assert a violation not only of the First Amendment, but also of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Under this proposed amendment they would enjoy no such protection. Now the first thing that strikes me in all of this is that it seems contradictory for Mr. Cobb to believe that trans - national corporations control our government and, at the same time, that the "cure" is to give the government the unfettered power of a police state when it comes to unions, political parties, partnerships, clubs, churches and charitable organizations. But more importantly, the second thing that strikes me is that the removal of constitutional rights from "entities" created by law is to remove significant rights from the people who make up those organizations and to vest considerable power in the government to regulate the way ep ople communicate and otherwise choose to act in concert. The proposed amendment would leave all rights intact as long as it was "every man for himself." But if groups of people were to form unions, corporations, partnerships, charitable organizations, associations or political parties under various state and federal laws providing for those organizations to be formed, the government would acquire the right to subject those groups to whatever treatment the government thought necessary. It is almost as if to say that people have constitutional rights, but if they ever try to use them effectively in concert, the rights are forfeit. This is a tremendous loss of freedom and a tremendous grant of authority to government, all in the name of protecting us from the government controlled by trans - national corporations. I could write pages and pages of laws that might be passed by states or Congress to regulate the behavior of entities without "belly buttons," each of which would have a tremendous negative impact on the rights of natural persons in their conduct of every-day life. Churches, political parties, labor unions, corporations, partnerships, charitable organizations and political movements — all organized by ep ople in furtherance of their joint and personal interests — would come under the definition of the proposed amendment as "entities, established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state." The people acting in concert within any such organization would find their joint activity subject to limits, controls, prohibitions, requirements and invasions at the hands of government with no recourse to the Constitutional rights that have protected us for more than 200 years. -3— August 23, 2012 From the tenor of the presentation I attended, this issue appeared to pit conservatives against liberals. I believe that should not be the case. Conservatives and liberals actually focusing on the practical application of this proposed amendment should be in agreement. To illustrate, in 1957 a case reached the Supreme Court of the United States where the United States brought an action against the Auto Workers Union for violating a federal prohibition against labor unions endorsing candidates. The majority of the court sent the question back to the trial court for more evidence, and refused to decide the First Amendment issue presented by the case. The leading liberal justice on the Court, and a tireless champion of civil rights into the 1970's was Justice William O: Douglas, who had been appointed to the Court in. 1939 by President Roosevelt and served for more than 36 years. Justice Douglas wrote an opinion critical of the majority for, as he saw it, dodging the Constitutional question. He was joined in this opinion by fellow FDR appointee Justice Hugo Black and Eisenhower appointee Chief Justice Earl Warren. He wrote: "We deal here with a problem: that is fundamental to the electoral ,process and to the operation of our democratic society. It is whether a union can express its views on the issues,of an election and on the merits of the candidates, unrestrained and unfettered by the Congress. The principle at stake is not peculiar to unions. It is .applicable as .well to associations of manufacturers, retail and wholesale trade groups, consumers' leagues, I farmers' unions, religious groups and every other association representing a segment of American life and taking an active part in our political campaigns and discussions. It is as important an issue as has come before the Court, for it reaches the very vitals of our system of government...." "Under our Constitution it is We The People who are sovereign. The people have the final say. The legislators are their spokesmen. The people determine through their votes the destiny of the nation. It is therefore important - vitally important - that all channels of communication be open to them during every election, that no point of view be restrained or barred, and that the people have access to the views of every group in the community...." "Some may think that one group or another "should not express its views in an election because it is too powerful, because it advocates unpopular ideas, or because it has a record of lawless action. But these are not justifications for withholding First Amendment rights from any group - labor or corporate. First Amendment rights are part of the heritage of all persons and groups in this country. They are not to be dispensed or withheld merely because we or the Congress thinks the person or group is worthy or unworthy....." I respectfully ask that you heed Justice Douglas' words with respect to the importance of the freedom of speech "of all persons, and groups," and that you contemplate the impact of the loss of the other precious freedoms that would be severely limited by this proposal. cerely, f Richard L. Evans 5716 WYCLIFFE ROAD • EDINA, MN • 55436 Susan Howl Dear Mayor and City Council members, As a resident of Paiute Pass for 33 years, I am compelled to write about the visibility problem at the intersection of Valley View Road and Sally Lane. I have observed the deterioration of sight lines throughout the years, expecially as the evergreen trees to the East of that intersection have grown wider. For several years preceding my signing of the original petition, and again this year, I contacted the police officer(s) in charge of fielding calls about that intersection to discuss the situation. I am well aware that no accidents have yet occurred at that intersection; however that is not a reason to maintain the status quo. Those us us who use that route at least once a day are well aware that it is an accident waiting to happen! For several years, I was told by the police officer(s) that a sidewalk was going to be built on Valley View Road, and that would alleviate the sight line problem. That never came to fruition, and it is time for this situation to be settled, and not allowed to drag on any further. The emotional arguments of the homeowner with the trees are being allowed to dominate the rational issues of this situation. They failed to do their due diligence when they puchased the house with the trees, and now are not willing or able to accept the consequences. This is about more than disappointment and tears. This is about public safety! There are pros and cons to buying a residence on a corner lot, as there are pros and cons to buying property on a busy street. There is no written documentation from the City that officially suggests planting the trees to form a barrier. And suggest that a clarification of the variance for not planting trees a certain number of feet from a roadway should impact the City Council's final decision. The white line that has been painted as an extensior of the existing STOP sign is no longer adequate for a safe sight line for people turning left from southbound Sally Lane onto Valley View Road. And the inevitable snow and ice from the coming winter complicate the issue, which is why a decision needs to be rendered now by the City Council, and adhered to by the homeowner. As for the lilacs on the West side of that intersection, which was mentioned in the original petition, but is not part of this discussion, it is unfortunate that the homeowner does not take the same pride in his yeard that the rest of the neighborhood does. His property is an embarrassing entrance to a neigborhood that takes pride in its' appearance. Perhaps the City Council could deal with that issue very soon. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter, and please act in the best interests of safety for our neighborhood. Sincerely, Devie Koval 6613 Paiute Pass Edina, MN 55439 (952)944 -2483 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 12:52 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Is Edina prepared for a 100 year storm =_.:.. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ^!` Wi h '-`, 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCa7EdinaMlJ.aov www.EdinaMN.gov .,. > I _.:,;...` ...For Living, Learning, Raising Faruilies & Doing Business From: ifhcrownagmail.com [mailto:jfhcrown @gmail.coml On Behalf Of John Healey Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 11:51 AM To: ionibennettl2 (-Ocomcast.net; Edina Mail Subject: RE: Is Edina prepared for a 100 year storm RE: City preparedness Dear Mayor Hovland and Senior Council Member Bennett, As I write, perhaps half of Louisiana is without power, they are expecting over a foot of rain. Many areas in the U.S. , including Duluth quite recently have been devastated by weather. There must be a lot to learn on what preparedness worked and what was missed. The metro area on the other hand has been mostly sparred for years. Hopefully, Edina is up to date as much as possible to be battle hardened in case of any weather, incident or other adversity. Since our city management is more competent than ever, I suspect we are well prepared, but just wanted to ask. Can storm water systems handle 12 inch or more rainfall ? Are city computer systems backed up off site out of state? Does Edina have generator capacity to run utilities /police /fire indefinitely and run city water plants ? It may be really neat to periodically share physical preparations with the public via the Sun Current:) Endeavors like" code red" are very worthwhile. Great job there!! Many thanks to all of you for a great conscientious job on council this year. Regards, John Healey 4808 Upper Terrace 952 - 929 -8800 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 9:19 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Update to email sent August 26 2012 entitled boulevards and watering Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCo7EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6z. Doing Business From: Kathy Dahlheimer [ mailto:kdahlheimer @comcast.netl Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 2:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Update to email sent August 26 2012 entitled boulevards and watering Hello again ... I just heard a bit more of the meeting from this past week and it seems that Josh Sprague brought this topic up already and I applaud that. While West 70th Street is bad so is Valley View as you go West from Concord. As Ms. Swenson mentioned it is dead and that is because noone watered it after the city did their job. I agree a different treatment is needed. While watering is a drag without irrigation, as a homeowner I would not be happy to have that in front of my home. Anyway glad it is a topic being discussed. Thanks. — Kathleen Dahlheimer Finance & Commerce > Print > PACE funds a second Edina energy deal Page 1 of 2 Finance & Commerce http: / /finance- commerce.com PACE funds a second Edina energy deal by Mark Anderson Published: August 22nd, 2012 First community bank joins program, but rates remain high The city of Edina approved on Tuesday its second use of an innovative financing tool to spur energy efficient upgrades in commercial buildings. Edina will issue about $40,000 of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) bonds this summer to finance new lighting and other energy- saving kitchen improvements at Salut Bar Americain, owned by the Parasole Restaurant Holdings, Inc. near 50th and France. The small project means big money: Parasole's contractor, Waconia -based Energy Misers LLC promised that the upgrades will deliver annual savings of $16,400. But the project shows that the work-in - progress PACEp.rocgram still has room for improvement. "It's an arduous process," said Alan Ackerberg, development manager with Parasole who is managing the project. "With the paperwork and the financial disclosure that was involved it could have been a several million - dollar project." Parasole Restaurants gained big energy savings by installing LED lighting and efficient kitchen controls in their last two restaurant build -outs. Development manager Alan Ackerberg is aiming to repeat those gains with a retrofit at Salut Bar Americain at 5034 France Ave. S. in Edina. (Staff photo: Bill Klotz) Ackerberg said he believes a smaller mom - and -pop organization would have trouble making it through the process. The cost to borrowers remains high, too. PACE took a step toward lowering costs on this project by persuading Bremer Bank to become the first community bank in the nation to invest in the bonds. Bremer agreed to a 5.5 percent yield on the five -year bonds, well below the 7 percent paid to the California equity firm that funded last fall's first Edina PACE bond. But the rate jumped back up when the city reinstated a 2 percent administrative fee that it waived in that first go- round. Still, Ackerberg said he's happy with the results. The PACE bonds will provide $39,308 toward a $50,000 retrofit, with Xcel Energy rebates providing another $11,000. With no down payment required, Ackerberg said the monthly energy savings will exceed its debt service, meaning an immediate improvement in its cash flow. "The savings should pay back the investment in two and a half years, and beyond that it's all gravy," Ackerberg said. "It's a no- brainer." He said Parasole plans to explore using PACE at mhtml: file: / /C:\ Users \showl \AppData\Local\Microsoft \Windows \Temporar... 8/28/2012 Finance & Commerce > Print > PACE funds a second Edina energy deal Page 2 of 2 another restaurant it owns in the city. Ackerberg said Parasole had other financing options, but the company worried that it could limit its ability to borrow for other projects. Banks see restaurants and energy investments as higher risk, Ackerberg said, and borrowing from banks would have tied up the company's collateral. "We're growing and we didn't want to tie up a lot of our credit in this loan," Ackerberg said. Parasole and Energy Misers' principal Bill Bieganek also pursued loans through the St. Paul Port Authority and the Center for Energy and the Environment, but didn't want to provide the personal guarantees those to programs required as security. PACE offers a different kind of security for investors. The Minnesota Legislature adopted the model in 2010, one of 29 states that authorized the tool. It enables municipalities to issue revenue bonds for renewable energy investments on private properties — commercial properties only in Edina. The PACE advantage is that the city treats the debt as a special assessment, meaning PACE repayments are collected as part of the property's real estate taxes. j And it puts the PACE obligation in the same senior position held by city's property taxes in the event of a default, and that helped persuade Bremer Bank to buy the bonds, according to Greg Hohlen, Bremer Bank's SBA lending manager in St. Cloud who is working on this transaction. "When it was clear that we would be on par with the real estate, that we'd be repaid before the first mortgage holder, then we were comfortable," Hohlen said. Jeremy Kalin, principal with Minneapolis -based Eutectics Consulting, which advised both of Edina's PACE beneficiaries, has been recruiting Bremer and other Minnesota investors for years. He's counting on Bremer being the first of many Minnesota investors to join the PACE bond market and drive down the rates. Up till now, almost all PACE investment nationwide has been by a few California private equity investors. "When we lessen the distance between the borrower and the local government and the bank that brings these financings closer to mainstream," Kalin said. He also pointed out that local banks gain Community Reinvestment Act credits — indicating service in their local markets -by buying PACE bonds, and that gives them a regulatory benefit. The rates investors require should also come down as investors learn more about PACE, said Stefanie Galey, an attorney and municipal bond specialist with Faegre Baker Daniels in Minneapolis. "When they see that these will be treated just like property tax in a default, I don't see any reason why they won't be willing to purchase these bonds at lower prices." Edina Mayor James Hovland said the city council also wants to bring the rates down, and it's going to review its administrative costs and may be able to reduce or eliminate the 2 percent fee. Edina remains the only Minnesota city using PACE, but Kalin said that Eden Prairie, Eagan and Dakota County are all considering adopting it. Eagan City Administrator Tom Hedges said his city has just started a formal review of creating a PACE bond. "We've done a lot of work on energy retrofits, and we're very familiar with PACE," Hedges said. "There's momentum here to get behind it." Salut upgrades using PACE Investment: $50,000 Projected annual saving: $16,409 Source: Energy Misers LLC Complete URL: http: // finance- commerce.com /2012/08 /pace- funds -a- second - edina- energy -deal/ mhtml:file://C:\ Users \showl \AppData\Local\Microsoft \Windows \Temporar... 8/28/2012 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 8:30 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Vacant lot at corner of Littel and Lynn in Morningide Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 -826 -0389 F" IbiunnoCcDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ..For Living, learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Tom & Judy Plant rmailtoJplant10)comcast.net1 Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 5:15 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshspragueCabedinarealty.com; swensonanni @gmail.com; Scott Neal Subject: Vacant lot at corner of Littel and Lynn in Morningide Dear Mayor Hovland, City Council Members and City Manager Neal, We live at the 4350 Morningside Rd, on the corner of Morningside and1ynn. Along with many of our neighbors, we've watched with increasing dismay the construction of the house at 4234 Lynn Avenue and the destruction of the peaceful little glade that was the vacant lot next to it. I believe the vacant lot is owned by the city. We are writing to express our concern and desire that the vacant lot be restored as closely as possible to its condition before construction of the new house began. The massive rock wall that now abuts the lot needs to be softened with vegetation and the shade trees that have been removed should be replanted. It's not necessary, in our opinion, to formally landscape the lot. That would only require intensive maintenance that most likely won't be available. However, grass, a variety of shade trees, and some vines or bushes planted on or adjacent to the wall would do the trick. Since the city was gracious enough to allow the use of the lot for the construction of the new home, we do not think the city should foot the bill for the lot's restoration. Please do the right thing and require the builder and new home owners to put things back as closely as possible to the way they were. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Tom and Judy Plant 952 - 922 -0354 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 9:19 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: For City Council Boulevards and watering Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, David Goergen and Byron Theis. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(caEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Familes & Doing Business From: Kathy Dahlheimer jmailto :kdahlheimer(a)comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 10:46 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: For City Council Boulevards and watering Hello: I have had a couple of situations at my home at 4801 West 60th Str. One case required new sod and in the latest just a lot of attention to watering to make sure it came back after installing new copper pipe to street after leak. The city put in the sod last year and then came around a number of times with water truck. It is, however clearly up to the homeowner to water enough to make sure everything goes back to normal.I have noted on my usual driving routes which include Valley View Road going west from Concord that most of the boulevards are completely dead. It seems sort of a waste to put sod in and apparently homeowners are not watering. The same is true on West 70th Street which could be so beautiful but frankly looks awful with all that dead grass in contrast with the lawns at least being somewhat green (bad year without irrigation). Does the city have any say about that? It really looks bad. So much money is spent on these projects but they can't look very good unless the homeowners participate. Another place I drive daily is the intersection of 50th Street and Wooddale. Not sure what the accident rate is there but I hate that place. For example person driving south on Wooddale has two choices ... get in turn lane or stay in main lane which is also turn left lane. The oncoming traffic is the same. Many people turn there... people then go in the turn lane to get around but that is confusing to the oncoming traffic turning etc. etc. It seems like those north and south turn lanes should be straight and turn right lanes and the lane next to middle left turn lane. Of course there may be other better ideas but I have personally witnessed so much confusion there at busy times it seems like it could be simplified easily. Those two items have been in my mind to mention so finally got a minute to do that. Would like to say I had occasion recently with my service line leak and replacement to have the water department out and response time and helpfulness of the employees is excellent. Dave Gorgen also answered some questions and is very responsive. It took a very long time to find the shut off but they kept at it and bringing in new people to help. They also assisted me in hiring Suburban Water and Sewer to do the work (on very short notice) while other companies had months waiting time. I know Suburban works often with the city and Kevin is great to work with and his team worked very hard to get it done quickly. I would not have found them without the Edina water guys' help. Services in Edina are really good ... thank you. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:21 AM ;c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: green space Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michelle Horan fmailto:mhoran00Pgmaif.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 6:54 PM To: Scott Neal; Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast. net Subject: green space Joni, Scott and Mayor Hovland, This is Michelle Horan, from the RSW committee and I live on Lynn Ave. I need to ask you about the landscaping plan on the corner of Lynn and Littel. I was aware that Tim Rudnicki wanted to inquire about the process of how decisions were made about city green space and specifically how the decision to utilize the green space by the new owners of the neighboring property (friends of ours). I live five houses down from that space and was never asked my opinion. Now I find out that there is a landscaping project already started and we were never informed in any step of the process. I would like to know why Mr. Rudnicki and Mr. Parish became the spokesperson for the neighborhood when we were never asked our input. I know the goal is to beautify the space, which I am supportive of but what about the process? Who pays for this improvement? Is this a city expenditure and if so is it a necessary one? I appreciate your efforts to help our neighborhood and look forward to your feedback. Thanks, Michelle Horan mhoran00 @gmail.com 952 929 0165 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:26 PM To: Sherry Engelman; John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: City Council & Edina Health Committee — Supporting Community Gardens Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Sherry Engelman and John Keprios. -'<; Lynette Biunno, Receptionist c f E? t 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCrDEdinaMN.QOV I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: LAURA MELTON [mailto:hopemelton @hotmail.com1 Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:21 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: City Council & Edina Health Committee -- Supporting Community Gardens Dear Members of the City Council and the Health Committee My name is Hope Melton (Laura legal first name). I live at 4825 Valley View Road, and I do a little gardening around my home, a few vegetables and flowers. I enthusiastically support a Community Garden Resolution that would promote gardens on both public and private lands. The creation of community gardens fits well with the city's efforts to create neighborhood associations that engage in all sorts of social capital building efforts. It would be a wonderful opportunity for Edina's healthy and engaged older residents (and there are many) to get together with younger generations in producing healthy food, lovely flowers, and just a place to learn gardening and have fun! I can also see healthy recipe exchanges offering opportunities for cross - cultural learning. Thanks for all your efforts to create a healthier community. Sincerely, Hope Melton L Hope Melton, MA MCRP Hopeful Ventures Elders in Community: Re- Imagining the Future 952 -926 -3959 hopemelton(a)hotmail.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Rent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:33 AM Susan Howl subject: FW: Green Space for Lynn /Littel Street Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Mindy Greeley fmailto :mindVgreeley @comcast.netl Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 6:07 PM To: Scott Neal; Edina Mail; lonibennettl2 @comcast.net Subject: Green Space for Lynn /Littel Street My name is Mindy Greeley. My address is 4232 Lynn Avenue. I live directly across from the green space and the new home being built on Lynn Avenue and Littel Street. First off, I love the new home being built. It is very tasteful and will add value to Lynn Avenue and the entire Morningside neighborhood. However, it was unfortunate that several trees had to be cut down in the process, (I wish it were the cotton woods). I was relieved to learn that the trees will be replaced. I am sure it will look great once the entire project is done. I am concerned that only two residents, Tim Rudnicki and Rob Parish were asked for their input regarding the nprovements to the landscaping. It would make sense that the neighbors that actually border the green space would nave input as well. Thank you for your time. Regards, Mindy Greeley Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 4:03 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: Fw: Mayor Hovland & City Council Members >�=•:;.. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ?;4,( IbiunnoCcDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: LOIS RING [mailto:llydesigns0)msn.com1 Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 3:45 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: For: Mayor Hovland & City Council Members Mo The below is from the Edina Patch. I live at Centennial Lakes Village Homes and a monthly fee is paid into the Centennial Lakes Park fund by each owner since the inception of our condominium association. My question: Is this the same fund as the loan to Simon Properties is derived from? Where exactly do our park fees go? We have 250 units so it is $45,000 annually. Thank you, Lois Ring 7440 Edinborough Way Edina City Council last month approved a $5 million, zero - interest loan to Simon Property Group to help incentivize the overhaul of the aging mall. The loan only covers improvements to the common areas of the mall, with parent company Simon Properties reported to invest $14 million of its own money into the project. The $5 million loan is coming solely from the Centennial Lakes TIF district and the funds will be repaid directly to that district, according to city staff. Mayor Hovland and the City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: City of Edina. I am writing on behalf of the Community Health Committee. We applaud the Mayor and City Council in embarking on do.town with the vision of "communities where people live longer, healthier lives." A key component of leading longer, healthier lives involves healthy eating. Cities play a central role in the effort to improve community health. There are a variety of strategies that cities can employ to improve the quality and access of healthy food for their residents. An important element in attaining our vision are the actions taken in City operated facilities and sponsored events. Currently, the Edina Parks & Recreation Department is working toward a department policy to ensure at least 40% of foods served by City operated concessions meet nutrition standards established by the City. Implementation of practice changes are in process with the Aquatics Center and Edinborough Park having met this goal. We strongly support these efforts and the leadership the department is taking. We recommend the City build on the efforts of the Park & Recreation Department to provide an environment that supports healthy food and beverage choices by residents, visitors and employees in all City- operated facilities and sponsored events. Our specific recommendation is for the City to: Adopt a City vending and procurement policy that establishes nutrition standards for food and beverages served and sold on City, property and at City- sponsored events (including concessions, vending, events and meal programs). City standards may differ by venue or type of event. Across the country, cities are taking action to increase the availability of healthy foods, decrease unhealthy options, and are being mindful of advertising of unhealthy foods, particularly in facilities serving youth. Some studies have demonstrated that reducing unhealthy options and increasing healthy options (accompanied by strategic pricing) at public facilities encourages healthier choices by consumers. The attached document, Leadership for Healthy Communities Advancing Policies to Support Healthy Eating and Active Living (p.12 -15), provides further information and examples of city policies as well as other low /no -cost policy options to increase healthy eating. Additionally, we have provided some nutritional standards information that may be useful should the City decide to implement a policy. Understanding that the City will need to consider all factors related to implementing our recommendation, we hope the City will build on the Park & Recreation initiative, providing healthier options in all food and beverage environments operated by the City. Thank you for considering our position and recommendation. Sincerely, Matt Doscotch, Chair Edina Community Health Committee Edina Police Department Administration (952) 826 -1610 4801 West 50th Street Fax (952) 826 -1607 Edina, Minnesota Police 24 hr. and TDD Line (952) 826 -1600 55424 -1394 Obesity Prevention on a Budget: Low- and No -cost Policy Options to Increase Healthy Eating and Active Living August, 2011 Leadepship for Healthy Communities In response to the national childhood obesity epidemic, many local, state and federal leaders have advanced policies that provide children with greater opportunities to eat nutritious foods and engage in safe physical activity. Yet, the recent recession has made it much more difficult for officials at every level of government to provide services that meet the ongoing needs of their communities. As of February 2011, at least 46 states and the District of Columbia had to make cuts to social services, with most cuts affecting children, the elderly and the disabled.' Compounding the daunting economic climate is the fact that childhood obesity results in severe financial and health consequences that cannot be ignored. Obesity and its related health care expenses are estimated to cost the United States as much as $147 billion annually,3'4 with additional costs associated with lost worker productivity. Moreover, obese individuals are more likely to experience burdensome chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and high blood pressure. These steep financial and human costs make obesity prevention both an economic and health necessity. In order to support policymakers who want to address obesity in communities and states with limited budgets, Leadership for Healthy Communities has developed the following low- and no -cost policy toolkit. The toolkit presents a range of budget - conscious policy approaches that leverage existing resources and partnerships to reduce local obesity rates by increasing opportunities for healthy eating and physical activity. Organized by policy option, each section includes an explanation of the suggested policy approach, steps that policymakers and others can take to implement it, a brief discussion of fiscal and practical considerations and a case study of a community that implemented a similar policy. 2 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget xntiryv. leadershipfor lhealthycommunities. org The toolkit presents a range of bu—doet- conscious policy approaches that leverage existing resources and partnerships to reduce local obesio.) rates by increasing opportunities Pr healthy eating and physical activity. 1��� Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Leadership for Healthy Communities www. leadet-shipforliealthycothmunities .org The policy options include: • Establishing an Obesity Prevention Council or Task Force • Developing a Public -Use Plan, Public Dedication Ordinance or Zoning Code that Promotes Active Living • Establishing Joint -Use Agreements for Recreational Areas • Implementing Supervised Recess in Schools • Setting Up and Promoting Farmers' Markets • Encouraging Government and Public Facilities to Procure Healthier Foods and Beverages • Restricting Marketing of Unhealthy Foods In and Near Schools Establishing an Obesity Prevention Council or Task Force Obesity prevention councils and task forces can be used in states and localities to develop tailored obesity prevention strategies. These councils and task forces can take a range of forms, from interagency and public - private partnerships to special policy or legislative committees. Traditionally, members either volunteer or are appointed to serve on the committee or task force. The advisory bodies are typically cooperative in nature, and are authorized to develop policy recommendations that promote opportunities for community residents to live healthy, active lives. By using local or state obesity data and enlisting participation from residents, businesses and universities, these councils and task forces can make considerable progress in preventing and reducing obesity. ACTION STEPS ■ Government officials can build support for an obesity prevention council by communicating to public and private stakeholders, including the community at large, the costs of obesity as well as the social and economic benefits of addressing it. They also can encourage participation in the obesity prevention council. • State legislators and city and county council members can authorize the establishment of an obesity prevention council and/or legislative task force. • Governors and mayors can create local advisory committees and recruit agencies, individuals and organizations to participate. • Residents can reinforce the value of the obesity prevention council by holding policymakers to account for its establishment and follow through on the council's fmdings and recommendations. 3 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget Leadership for Healthy Communities www. leadeishipforliea lthycommunities.org FISCAL NOTE The direct cost of an obesity prevention council to the public is likely to be negligible and mainly for the space and meeting resources needed to convene and staff the committee. If needed, leaders can engage members of businesses and the nonprofit sector as partners to defray costs associated with meeting logistics, staffing and communicating, and implementing recommendations. That being said, it is likely that obesity councils and/or task forces may provide recommendations for policies that may impact public budgets. .State and local governments can minimize the cost of such recommendations by,leveraging resources across governmental agencies and/or engaging other public and private entities to implement and fund solutions. POLICY AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS ✓ Legislative authority. Enacting a policy to authorize the council lends legitimacy and 'creates accountability `for participants. % ✓ Building support. Engaging the community early in the process can help garner support�for the council's efforts and ensure buy -in for its findings and recommendations. Publicizing the council's efforts also can increase prestige associated with participation and increase the interest of funders and the community. ✓ Recruiting participants. Establishing partnerships with the private sector can help defray costs and ensure that the council considers their interests. Recruiting those from various sectors with an interest in preventing and reducing obesity, including health officials, researchers, businesses, schools and community members, can help ensure that councils and/or task forces represent a broad perspective. ✓ Staffing. Ensuring that the council is adequately and professionally staffed will allow it to function efficiently and effectively while keeping participants engaged. ✓ Sustainability. The timeframe for councils or task forces can be very long or very short depending on the manner in which they are established. In order to ensure long -term sustainability and impact, committee members should continually assess, evaluate and report on the implementation of its recommendations. CASE STUDY In 1999, the Louisiana legislature authorized the Louisiana Council on Obesity Prevention and Management (LA Obesity Council).5 Housed in the Department of Health and Hospitals, the council is comprised of representatives from government agencies, healthcare facilities, universities, research facilities, professional associations, insurance, business /industry and nonprofit organizations. The council meets quarterly to "strengthen the alignment, development and implementation of programs, projects and research to respond to the public health challenge of obesity. "6 Working from a three -year strategic plan, council objectives focus on environmental change, capacity building, education and awareness. A part-time coordinator staffs the council, which is responsible for publishing an annual report, 4 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget Leadership for Healthy Communities organizing events and making periodic presentations to the state legislature on the council's activities. In their 2008 summary report, the LA Obesity Council lists many accomplishments including the implementation of a school wellness policy, a report card on physical activity in the state, a healthy food retail study and the continuation of an award program for excellence in education to prevent childhood obesity.7 Developing a Public -Use Plan, Public Dedication Ordinance or Zoning Code that Promotes Active Living Research has identified the role that the built environment —or lack thereof —plays in mitigating or exacerbating obesity. 8,9 Studies show that community development that includes sidewalks, greenways, traffic- calming areas, and walkable spaces are not only more attractive but safer as well. 10" 1 Communities that provide their residents with safe, attractive and accessible places to walk, run, bike and play are less likely to have a high prevalence of obesity. 12 Recognizing this, many policymakers have embraced public -use plans as a mechanism to increase opportunities for active living. Public -use plans, public dedication ordinances and zoning codes can be used by governments to develop parks, sidewalks and bike trails. To ensure that new development in their communities is consistent with this goal, policymakers can create plans and codes that require new projects to set aside space to support active transportation and physical activity, such as trails, fields and parks. ACTION STEPS • State officials can consider requiring that new developments supported by state funds include plans for ensuring spaces for active living. • City and county officials can explore the legality, feasibility and potential constraints of imposing a public use or public dedication plan on developers. • Mayors can engage developers, builders associations and others in the private sector to assess the need, feasibility and impact of any proposed public dedication or public use plan. • Community members can participate in public hearings, comment periods and other processes during which the public dedication or public use plan is being developed. FISCAL NOTE The costs associated with the development and adoption of a public -use plan, public dedication ordinance or zoning code will include plan preparation, surveying, scoping, draft plans, public notices and meetings, and any personnel and contractor services costs. It is important to note that if executed incorrectly, a public -use or public dedication plan could be quite costly and result in protracted legal action. 5 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget www.leadei shipforhealthycommunities. org Public -use plans provide guidance on the use of publicly -owned spaces for the public good. These plans can set community goals for ensuring residents can engage in safe physical activity in these areas. Public dedication ordinances can be used to require new public or private development to set aside land dedicated to public use, such as parks, playgrounds and trails. Zoning codes can be used to protect current public spaces and to set requirements for future development, such as requiring sidewalks or access to public transit. Leadership for Healthy Communities x, ww.l eadeishipforlrealthycommuniries .org POLICY AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS Best practices. Many national organizations, such as the National Parks and Recreation Association, are familiar with this approach and can offer guidance and resources to help communities develop similar plans. 13 ✓ Buy -in. Engaging developers and the community in plan development will help build and broaden a base of support. Goals and objectives. Establishing and publicizing clear goals and objectives for a community's public use plan, including promoting physical activity and reducing overweight and obesity, also will help build support. ✓ Compliance issues. Although lessons can be gleaned from ordinances adopted in other states, policymakers should make sure that ordinances are customized to fit local needs and are compliant with their own state's laws. Evaluation and impact. Including feedback mechanisms – like public hearings and surveys —in a community's plan development process can help minimize or eliminate challenges to the plan's validity. Policymakers should assess, evaluate and report on the development and implementation of the public use plan, including its ultimate impact on physical activity. CASE STUDY In 2009, Minneapolis, Minn., passed a public dedication ordinance in order to maintain "a healthy and desirable environment for residents and persons employed within the city." 14 The ordinance recognizes that open spaces and parks significantly enhance the value and attractiveness of the community. By requiring all new developments that increase the number of residential units or employees in the city set aside land to develop parks, playgrounds, recreational facilities, wetlands, trails, or open spaces, the city is ensuring that residents have places for safe, active play. Establishing Joint -Use Agreements for Recreational Areas A joint -use agreement is a formal agreement between two separate public or private entities —often a school and a city or county— outlining the terms and conditions for sharing the use of facilities.15 For example, city governments can contract with local schools districts in order to allow members of a community to use of playgrounds and fields after school hours. These agreements can allow residents to enjoy recreational space in communities where parks, schoolyards and budgets are all limited. Maximizing a community's use of existing structures can substitute for new site development when resources are scarce, particularly where there is a growing need to increase physical activity in communities fighting higher rates of childhood obesity. Formal joint -use agreements for using indoor and outdoor school facilities are more common in more populated locales, while less populated areas commonly use informal agreements. 16 The long -term benefits of joint -use agreements include healthier and closer -knit communities that take greater collective pride in 6 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget Leadership for Healthy Communities. www.l eadershipforhea lthycon:munities.org maintaining safe and clean school grounds. 17 Joint -use agreements are most effective when partners recognize the benefits of pooling resources. 18 ACTION STEPS • State officials can establish laws that open public school facilities for community use after hours, such as California's Civic Center Act 19 and the California Community College Civic Center Act. 20 • City and. county officials can examine federal opportunities for funding to support -local joint -use efforts, particularly in eligible lower- income communities. The 21 st Century 'Community Learning Centers program, part of the 2002. _ Elementary and Secondary Education Act, provides funding for schools to host after - school academic and enrichment programs.zt • Mayors can consult with their colleagues in neighboring cities or surrounding counties toy assess whether facility needs can be met by creating local partnerships. ® School administrators can maintain accurate and up -to -date records.of annual facility costs to support cost - benefit analyses of the shared space., FISCAL NOTE The most significant direct costs of joint -use agreements are those incurred as a result of increaseduse of a facility, including, personnel such as security guards'and facilities maintenance crews. Officials should consider, the full cost of maintenance for a given facility on a per square foot and per hour basis,(i.e., an,agreement, governing the use of a pool may cost more than one for indoor basketball courts), as well as the role that school districts should play in subsidizing potential users. POLICY AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS ✓ Goals and objectives. Agreements are more likely to succeed if goals, including identifying the benefits accrued to each partner, are clearly articulated. zz Planning. Identifying funding and oversight responsibilities among and between partners is essential to reducing problems in implementation. An effective joint - use agreement should include a projection of how increased usage would affect facility COS ts.23 ✓ Sustainability. Long -term commitments from all parties involved provide the time to reassess and improve.the agreement if unanticipated difficulties arise. Anticipating conflicts and creating processes to resolve them will help sustain the agreement over time. ✓ Communication. Ongoing communication among partners and with the community is recommended, including periodic meetings and check -ins, even when the agreement is working as planned. By engaging the community, partners can ensure that they enter into an agreement that allows them to be responsive to community needs. 7 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget • Leadership for Healthy Communities ✓ Liability. One of the most often - mentioned challenges to joint use agreements is how to handle liability and insurance issues. Anticipating and clarifying the respective responsibilities of the parties should an injury occur is advisable. 24 Organizations such as the National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity can provide resources and guidance to address liability concerns. CASE STUDY In 2010, Seattle School District No. 1 and the City of Seattle Parks and Recreation department formalized an agreement for the joint use of facilities. The agreement allows the two entities to pool their resources to "meet continuous youth and community demands for more recreational opportunities. "25 The agreement includes a vision statement to outline the intent of the policy, the shared purpose, general agreement provisions and guidelines for joint use, processes for scheduling and managing the facilities, a process for cost and revenue sharing and a liability clause, among other features. In particular, each entity agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other party in any liability claims. The agreement also specifies that the shared use be based on "fiscally sound considerations," and that neither entity will be expected to subsidize the use of the facilities by the other party . 26 Implementing Supervised Recess in Schools Despite growing rates of childhood obesity, schools across the country are reducing or eliminating physical activity programs from the school day in response to budget constraints and mounting pressure to improve standardized test scores. 27 However, research shows that even 15 to 30 minutes of daily physical activity can improve academic focus and classroom behavior in all grades, while improving health. 28,29 Under the supervision of trained staff, recess allows children to engage in physical activity and develop healthy bodies, as well as practice important life - skills, such as sharing, communication, negotiation and problem-solving. 30 ACTION STEPS • State officials can implement policies and programs to support recess and /or physical activity breaks as necessary components of the school day. • City and county officials can ensure that proper funding is available for the purchase and maintenance of recess equipment, such as swings or monkey bars. • Mayors can engage the community and rally support to facilitate the implementation of daily recess in schools. • School administrators can implement schedules that integrate supervised recess and physical activity breaks as a regular part of the school day. 8 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget x rKw. leadershipforhealthycommunities. org � � I tlPl�• . w 1 � Leadership for Healthy Communities FISCAL NOTE Playground kits can be purchased to help schools implement more active recess. 31 Kits include playground blueprints, equipment, activity guides and training videos for staff and teachers. Utilizing a kit and employing volunteers to supervise children during recess provides local officials with a low -cost, high- activity opportunity to increase physical activity. Policymakers should expect to incur costs related to volunteer recruitment, training and background checks. Additional resources may be necessary to maintain the play area and equipment, including performing safety inspections. POLICY AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS ✓ Regulations or standards. Minimum standards could be adopted for daily physical activity or supervised recess for children at the local and state level. ✓ Community support. To garner support for physical activity/supervised recess at the local and state level, policymakers should consider engaging the community. ✓ Planning and implementation. School districts can establish committees composed of various stakeholders including community members, health officials and school administrators to help ensure appropriate planning and implementation. ✓ Staffing. Training staff and volunteers can help ensure that recess breaks feature moderate -to- vigorous physical activities. ✓ Evaluating results. Assessing and evaluating recess implementation at the school district level can help build the case for sustaining and expanding a successful program. CASE STUDY In 2006, the Hawaii State Board of Education Policy 1110 -6 required the Department of Education (DOE) to establish guidelines for physical activity in response to resounding concerns over childhood obesity. 32 The resulting Wellness Guidelines requires public schools to provide students in all grades with at least 20 minutes of supervised recess per day, provide qualified professionals to supervise physical activity and establish health committees at each school. To facilitate implementation of Policy 1110 -6, the DOE created the Wellness Guidelines Toolkit to monitor progress. The policy took effect in 2007 and schools were required to complete implementation by the end of the 2010 -2011 school year. In other parts of the country, schools that have implemented recess have reported some success associated with their programs, including a reduction of discipline referrals during unstructured time. 33 9 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget wK w.l eadershipforhea lthycanmunities.erg Leadership for Healthy Communities Setting Up and Promoting Farmers' Markets Farmers' markets can provide fruits and vegetables in communities where options are expensive or scarce. 34 Farmers' markets have proliferated over the past two decades in the United States, growing from more than 1,500 in 1994 to approximately 6,200 in 201 0.35 It is estimated that more than 60,000 farmers sell produce at these venues and 3 million consumers patronize them annually to the tune of $1.3 billion. 36 Markets can be set up in locations that are either under - utilized or generally used for other purposes such as parking lots, empty or abandoned plots of land or town centers. By facilitating policies that support privately operated or establish publicly operated farmers' markets, policymakers can create a new revenue stream for farmers, business owners and craftsmen while promoting healthy eating in their community. Additionally, policymakers can help ensure that vendors at these markets are equipped to accept payment from those enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) programs by requiring use of the electronic benefit transfer (EBT) system.3 ," With the EBT system, program beneficiaries use an electronic card, similar to a bank debit card, which transfers funds from the benefits account to the retailer. State agencies are responsible for authorizing retailers who wish to participate in WIC and SNAP and are charged with ensuring that a sufficient number of retailers receive such authorization. Many states use this system to encourage WIC and SNAP participants to use their benefits to purchase fresh fruits and vegetables. ACTION STEPS • Mayors and city council members can: — Establish a publicly operated farmers' market and prescribe easily navigable rules and regulations for its operation; — Develop a local farmers' market commission or advisory board; — Directly administer the functions of the farmers' market, including providing staffing and implementing a WIC and SNAP redemption program; and/or — Encourage boards of directors for local farmers' markets to develop a new WIC and SNAP redemption plan or publicize an existing plan. • City managers can provide information on by -laws and zoning considerations and anticipate and address issues like parking, traffic and other neighborhood impacts of the proposed market. • State and local health and human services officials can provide advice and technical assistance on key questions regarding the goods that are sold and requirements for inspections and safe handling of food products. They also can 10 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget www.leader shipforhealthycommunities. org Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture that, through grants to states, provides nutritious foods, nutrition education, and referrals to health and other social services to low - income pregnant, postpartum and breastfeeding women, and infants and children up to age 5 who are at nutrition risk. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for federal food stamps. Leadership for Healthy Communities www.l eadershipforhea lrhycom,nunities.org provide guidance to farmers' markets about how to accept WIC and SNAP benefits as payment. • Private partners can promote the farmers' market to potential vendors and community residents, and provide technical assistance with management and operation. • Nonprofit organizations and foundations can provide information resources and funding. In particular, they can help defray costs associated with obtaining the equipment and technology necessary to redeem WIC and SNAP benefits, and publicize the redemption program to community residents. • Community residents can patronize the market to ensure its success, serve on the market's board of directors and volunteer to participate in the maintenance and upkeep of the market location. FISCAL NOTE The costs of setting up a farmers market will vary, and depend on the size of the market, its location, whether or not farmers and other vendors are charged a fee for operating a stall, the costs related to promotion, the frequency with which the market operates and its requirements for staff (volunteer or paid). The cost to government associated with promoting a WIC and SNAP redemption program will include promotional and training materials and personnel time to develop and implement the promotional campaign. Policymakers should explore whether some of these costs can be offset with funding from nonprofit partners or the federal government. If the market is publicly operated, the costs may include private point -of -sale terminals (average cost of $700 per terminal) with monthly fees associated with terminal use and transaction costs. There is no fee associated with becoming authorized to accept WIC or SNAP benefits as payment and wired terminals to process EBT payments are generally free, except for telephone line usage charges and transaction fees. Many successful WIC and SNAP redemption programs at farmers' markets train dedicated staff to manage the program. A volunteer could fill this role if needed. POLICY AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS ✓ Feasibility. A feasibility assessment may help gauge the interest and need for a farmers' market in your community. Policymakers should leverage the expertise of nonprofit partners that work on nutrition and food security issues in these assessments. Form. A range of legal entities, including associations, 501(c)(3) structures or others can be employed to manage the market and house its operations. ✓ Community engagement. Policymakers should communicate with residents early and often in the planning for the farmers' market and its operation. 11 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget ' LeadEirship for Healthy Communities xn vw.l eade ,shipforl,eallhycommunilies.org ✓ Governance and management. To encourage sustainability, officials should establish a governing body to develop a mission statement for the market, manage its operations and resolve conflict or difficulties as they arise. ✓ Information resources. Researching and accessing federal, state, local and nonprofit resources for farmers' markets, such as the Fanners Market Coalition and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's tools and guides on the subject will help in the development and management of farmers' markets. 39,40 ✓ Funding. Enlisting private partners as sponsors can help defray costs associated with farmers' markets. ✓ Public relations. Engaging nonprofits, civic organizations and other advocates to encourage community patronage and to publicize the benefits to the local economy and residents, may help the market succeed. These partners can help develop messaging and campaigns to keep the community engaged and organize special events and incentives to encourage patronage. Compliance, standards and liability..Investigate insurance and other liability considerations associated with selling food items and operating at the chosen location. Establish clear standards of conduct and memoranda of understanding for vendors, including standards related to pricing. CASE STUDY The Maple Grove Farmers' Market in Maple Grove, Minn., a large suburban community, is an example of a successful, publicly operated farmers' market.41 Established by Maple Grove's city council in 2003, the market's first year was dedicated to planning and developing processes including dates, times, location, guidelines and a fee structure. The Maple Grove market is managed like any other city program, with assigned staff and oversight by the city administrator. Staff members work with the Hennepin County Environmental Health Department to ensure compliance with food safety requirements and two city employees serve as market coordinators recruiting vendors and promoting the market. A market manager works onsite whenever the market is open. All vendors must complete an application process and their fees go directly to support the market, defraying the costs of advertising, special events, supplies and market staff salaries. To maintain community interest and, engagement, the market manager organizes special events throughout the year, such as picnics and concerts. Encouraging Government and Public Facilities to Procure Healthier Foods and Beverages In 2008, nearly 17 million Americans were employed by state and local governments, and many more consume a significant portion of their diet at places operated, supported or regulated by the government, including vending machines in public facilities, child -care centers, senior centers, homeless shelters, public 12 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget Leadership for Healthy Communities hospitals, schools, correctional facilities and even highway rest stops. 42 By supporting incentives that increase the availability of healthy, locally grown foods in public facilities through government procurement practices and vending policies, policymakers can increase the nutritional quality of foods offered to people whose diets are wholly or partially dependent on government - controlled sources. This can include requiring that food vendors and vending machines in public facilities follow prescribed nutritional guidelines and/or provide labeling for the food they serve 43 Additionally, by placing a preference for locally grown fruits and vegetables in procurement and vending polices, governments can increase opportunities for local businesses and stimulate economic development. ACTION STEPS • State and local government leaders can develop policies that require or recommend that vendors to state- or locally - controlled facilities and government - sponsored events offer foods that meet specific nutritional guidelines and/or use products from in -state and local farmers. • Public health officials can provide specific data that shows the negative effect and high cost of poor nutrition and obesity in the state or locality. • Private partners and food vendors can provide healthier options that are cost - effective. The costs associated with implementing new vending standards include expenses related to the transition process, staff and public education about the program and initial compliance monitoring. Ongoing costs should not exceed the costs of any prior vending program, although vendors may argue that offering healthier foods increases their program costs. In those cases, vendors can explore cost - neutral changes, such as replacing whole milk with fat -free or low -fat milk. To further address these concerns, localities can combine their purchasing power or work with larger vendors in order to negotiate lower prices for healthier options. 44 Local food procurement has largely been examined in terms of its environmental and social benefits. While very little data exists to quantify the extent of the financial savings, there is anecdotal evidence to suggest that concerns about cost increases may be unwarranted. In Toronto, Ontario, where a local food procurement policy recently passed, the staff reported that there were "no immediate financial impacts" related to the adoption of the policy. 45 POLICY AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS ✓ Scope and responsibility. Ensuring that existing food vendors and public agencies understand who is affected by the new policy and who is responsible for its execution will help ease implementation challenges. 13 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget ,4,Kw.l eadershipforhealthycommunities. brg Vending policies set requirements for vendors who sell goods within government facilities. Local food procurement is the purchasing (by institutions) of fruits and vegetables grown by local farmers, often for nutritional and economic benefits. LeadePship for Healthy Communities Knvw. leadershipforhealthycommunities .org ✓ Policy and political climate. Each policy (local food procurement policies and nutritional guidelines for vending) is distinct, so policymakers should assess whether one or both approaches are likely to succeed based on their political and legislative climate. ✓ Nutritional guidelines. Nutritional guidelines should be defined with precision to avoid confusion among vendors who seek to comply and maintain their contracts with the state/locality. • Public education. The general public and other government agencies will need information about the economic, environmental and health benefits of locally grown food because their support is vital for the success of the initiative. Common myths about the quality of and safety standards for local food may have to be dispelled. • Partnerships. By partnering with neighboring states and localities, policymakers can increase the likelihood of success of their procurement program. ✓, Timelines and benchmarks. Transition to any new system will include bumps along the way. Establishing reasonable timelines and benchmarks can help minimize difficulties. ✓ Local food supply. When considering whether to establish requirements that increase demand for locally grown foods, policymakers should ascertain whether the 'supply is able to meet that demand. ✓ Legal checks. Charges of anti - competitiveness, unfair competition or non - compliance..with relevant rules, regulations and ordinances can doom a local procurement policy before it yields expected benefits. ✓ Data collection. If local procurement policies are instituted, officials can collect data regarding the relative cost of local fruits and vegetables as compared with those shipped from further distances. CASE STUDY California has been the leader in implementing policies that require specific nutritional standards for food and beverages sold in vending machines in public facilities. 46 Some of the examples include: ® Los Angeles County requires that 100. percent of foods sold in vending machines on government property meet State of California's Nutrition Guidelines. These standards also cover public schools. 47 ® In 2004, Contra Costa County enacted a policy requiring that 50 percent of food and beverages sold in vending machines in county-owned or operated facilities meet specific nutrition standards 48 © In 2006, Chula Vista County enacted a policy requiring that all vending machines at any city facility contain only healthy snack and beverage choices. 49 ® In 2010, by executive order, San Francisco set nutrition standards for food and beverages sold in vending machines on city and county property The standards 14 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget Leadership for Healthy Communities prohibit sugar- sweetened drinks and require that 50 percent of foods meet standards for fat, saturated and trans fat, and sugars. i0 Additionally, New York has enacted multiple laws and regulations designed to promote the procurement of food produced in-state. 51 State finance law section 165 provides that "state agencies may mandate that all or some food products" must be grown, produced or harvested in New York. Non -state agencies are encouraged to adopt the same standard. Executive order #39 provides that agencies take feasible actions to increase the proportion of their food purchases that are locally grown. Several other bills have been considered that would apply similar standards to school districts and facilities controlled by the Department of Health. An additional measure would help finance the transportation and distribution of food products from in -state sources. Restricting the Marketing of Unhealthy Foods in Schools Children consume a significant portion of their daily calories during the school day, and many fast -food chains and processed food manufacturers specifically target children while they are at school.52 This is especially disconcerting because studies show that food marketing within the school environment can influence what children eat outside of school hours. 53 Thus, it is important for school environments to reinforce healthy eating messages. Policymakers seeking to promote an overall wellness or obesity prevention strategy may consider restricting the marketing of unhealthy foods in the school environment by prohibiting all advertisements and promotions on campus, banning all food and beverage advertisements and promotions on campus, or forbidding the marketing of products that are not permitted to be sold on campus. This policy option may find additional support since the enactment of the Healthy, Hunger -Free Kids Act (P.L. 111 -296), which requires that state and local governments adhere to stronger nutrition standards in schools. 54 ACTIONS STEPS • State legislators and school boards can limit food marketing in schools with careful attention to constitutional parameters. • School administrators can ensure that policies are implemented in a manner consistent with the law. They also can seek supplemental funding to offset the loss of non -tax based revenues from vendor contracts. • Health officials and nonprofit organizations can provide technical assistance to school administrators and educators on how to implement the standards. • Private partners can sponsor public relations and media advocacy campaigns to educate parents and the community about the new policies and the benefits of healthy eating and active living. 15 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget www. l eader sh ipforheal thycommun ities. org Leadership for Healthy Communities www.l eade ,shipforhealrhycommunities.org FISCAL NOTE This approach does not have significant direct costs as it is mainly regulatory, in nature. Policymakers should expect some costs related to edubatingpeople about the new standards and ensuring compliance. Some schools may be reluctant to reduce or regulate competitive sales, particularly given, current economic challenge s.,However, schools that have replaced less - healthy competitive products with.healthier items have reported no loss in revenues. 55 The loss of that tool could place th ose districts in the position of having to make difficult decisions about programs previously funded by these contracts. To counteract this, schools can explore healthy fundraising activities, such as walk -a- thons, book fairs, non -food product sales and healthy food sales. 56 POLICY AND PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS Constitutional questions. The plan to restrict advertising of unhealthy foods in or around schools should be carefully crafted to avoid constitutional challenges. The National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity can provide resources and guidance to address these concerns. Offset of loss of funding. In some school districts, vendor contracts provide additional funding. Seeking out new fundraising sources to replace or even exceed those former sources can reduce opposition to the plan and maintain the availability of important activities. The Center for Science in the Public Interest found that beverage sales contracts are actually less profitable than other forms of fund raising, including non - food - related fund- raisers such as sales of gift wrap and candles. Further, among schools and districts that improved the nutritional quality of fund- raising products offered, most increased their revenues. 57 Compliance. It is important to ensure that leaders throughout the school district are aware of the new guidelines and have the tools and resources to comply. The Healthy Schools Program from the Alliance for a Healthier Generation offers technical assistance to school, parents and community members on this and other related topics. CASE STUDY In 2005, the Maine legislature prohibited brand - specific advertising of any foods or beverages in school buildings'or on school grounds that did not meet standards for sale or distribution on school grounds. The law further provides that the foods and beverages sold on school grounds be consistent with specific nutritional guidelines, thus effectively banning advertising of fast foods (which .would include "brand - specific" foods) and other unhealthy foods that would not meet the prescribed guidelines.58 16 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget Leadership for Healthy Communities Conclusion Using these low- and no -cost policy approaches, elected and appointed officials can help to increase opportunities for children to eat nutritious foods and engage in safe physical activity. Policymakers who would like more information or assistance regarding the advancement of these policies can learn more at www. leadershipforhealthyconlmLinities .org. Notes 1. Johnson N, Oliff P and Williams E. An Update on State Budget Cuts. Washington: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, February 2011. 2. Yach D, Stuckler D and Brownell KD. "Epidemiologic and economic consequences of the global epidemics of obesity and diabetes." Nature Medicine, 12(1), January 2006. 3. Finkelstein EA, Trogdon J, Cohen J and Dietz W. 'Annual Medical Spending Attributable to Obesity: Payer and Service - Specific Estimates." Health Affairs, 28(5),822-831, 2009. 4. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Bethesda: NIH, NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative, NIH Publication 98 -4083, September 1998. 5. Louisiana House Bill 1921 (1999). 6. What is the Louisiana Council on Obesity Prevention and Management? Louisiana: Louisiana Council on Obesity Prevention and Management, www.dhh.louisiana.gov /offices / ?ID =270 (accessed May 2011). 7. Louisiana Council on Obesity Prevention & Management -2008 Report. Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Office of Public Health Nutrition Service, 2009. 8. Sallis J and Glanz K. 'The Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Eating and Obesity in Childhood," The Future of Children, Vol. 16 (No. 1 Childhood Obesity): 2006. 9. Papas MA, Alberg A, Ewing R, Heizisouer K, Gary T and Klassen A. "The Built Environment and Obesity," Epidemiologic Review, Vol. 29: 2007. 17 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget wiww. leadershipforhealthycon fmunities. o' g Leadefship for Healthy Communities www. leadeishipforliealthycommunities .org 10. Tester J, Rutherford G, Wald Z, at al. 'A Matched Case - Control Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Speed Humps in Reducing Child Pedestrian Injuries.' American Joumal of Public Health, 94 (4), 2004. 11. Krahnstoever DK and Lawson CT. 'Do attributes in the physical environment Influence children's physical activity? A review of the literature.' International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3(19), 2006. 12. Sallis J and Glanz K. 13. The National Parks and,Recreation Association has as one of its guiding principlesr' policies that encourage walking, biking, and the development of alternative transportation networks that will create more livable and healthy communities' and maintains a research and policy database that can provide assistance to state and local policymakers seeking to promote this principle in their own communities. 14. Minneapolis, Minnesota Code of Ordinances §§ 589. 15. Opening School Grounds to the Community After Hours: A Toolkit for Increasing Physical Activity Through Joint Use Agreements. Oakland: Public Health Law and Policy, 2010. 16. Ibid. 17. Cooper, T and Vincent J. Joint Use School Partnerships in Califomia: Strategies to Enhance Schools and Communities. Berkeley: Center for.Cities and Schools and Public Health Law and Policy, August 2008. 18. Ibid. 19. Cal. Educ. Code §§ 38130 -38138 20. Cal. Educ. Code §§ 82537 - 82548. 21. Title 20, United States Code Annotated §§ 7171 - 7575. 22. Opening School Grounds to the Community After Hours: A toolkit for increasing physical activity through joint use agreements. Oakland: Public Health Lew and Policy, 2010. 23. Joint Use Schools Initiative: Partnerships and Environments for Student Success. Berkeley: Center for Cities and Schools, http: / /citiesandschools.berkeley.edu /joint- use.htmi (accessed July 2011). 24. Liability Risks for After Hours Use of Public Property. A 50 -State Survey. Oakland: National Policy and Legal Analysis Network, December 2008. 25. Agreement for the Joint Use of Facilities. Seattle School District No 1 and City of Seattle Parks and Recreation. 2010, www.seattle.gov/ parks /Publications /Policy /JUA.pdf (accessed August 2011). 26. Ibid. 27. Fenton Communications. Recess Rules. New Jersey: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2007. 28. Trost S. Research Brief. Active Education: Physical Education, Physical Activity, and Academic Performance. San Diego: Active Living Research, 2009. 29. Position Statement - Recess for Elementary School Students. National Association for Sport and Physical Education, 2006, www.aahperd.org /naspe /standards /upload/ Recess - for - Elementary- School - Students- 2006.pdf (accessed March 2011). - 30. Ibid. 31. Peaceful Playgrounds. http:// www. peacefulplaygrounds .com /index.htm (accessed March 2011). 32. State of Hawaii Health, Wellness and Safety Policy 1110 -6, htip: / /doe.k12.hi.us/ foodservice /toolkittwellnessguidelines.pdf (accessed March 2011). 33. Recess Report 2010: Are Schools Receiving a Passing Grade? Rochester: Healthi Kids, 2011. 34. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and Obesity. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2001. 35. Farmers' Market Coalition, Purpose, http:// farmersmarketcoalition .org /joinus /purpose (accessed March 2011). 36. Ibid. 18 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget Leadership for Healthy Communities 37. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, www.fns.usda.gov /snap /fags.htm (accessed March 2011). 38. WIC recipients are also eligible for the Farmers' Market Nutrition Program, which provides benefit checks that can be used toward the purchase of fresh fruits, vegetables and herbs only. 39. Market Manager 8 Organizer FAQ. Farmers Market Coalition, 2008, http: / /farmersmarketcoalition .org /managerfags (accessed July 2011). 40. Stegelin F. Establising and Operating a Community Farmers' Market. Lexington, K.Y: Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, 1997. 41. Coss, D. "Maple Grove Fanners' Market: A Case Study" Farmers' Market Manual for Minnesota: A Guide for Management and Vendors, Minnesota Farmers Market Association, 2006. 42. Government Employment and Payroll. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau, www.census.gov /govs /apes/ (accessed July 2011). 43. Understanding Healthy Procurement. Oakland: National Policy and Legal Analysis Network, 2011. 44. Improving The Food Environment Through Nutrition Standards: A Guide for Government Procurement. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2010. 45. Toronto Local Food Procurement Policy, Staff Report. Toronto: Toronto Environment Office, June 2011. www.toronto.ca /legdocs /mmis/ 2011 /gm /bgrd /backgroundfile- 39120.pdf (accessed July 2011). 46. State and Local Procurement Policies. Washington: Center for Science in the Public Interest. www.cspinet.org/ new/ pdf /state_policy_descriptions.pdf (accessed July 2011). 47. Ibid. 48. Ibid. 49. Ibid. 50. Ibid. 51. Dang, Q and Ackerman A. Laws Affecting Healthy and Local Procurement in New York. Presentation. New York: Public Health Law and Policy, May 2011. www.nyam.org/ dash- ny /NYAM_Laws3- Compatibility- Mode.pdf (accessed July 2011). 52. Molnar Alex at al. Executive Summary: A National Survey of the Types and Extent of the Marketing of Foods of Minimal Nutritional Value in Schools. Tempe, A.Z.: Arizona State University, Commercialism in Education Research Unit, 2 -3 (2006), http: / /epsl.asu.edu /ceru /Documents /EPSL- 0609 - 211 -CERU- EXEC.doc (accessed June 17, 2007). 53. Kubik, Martha at al., "The Association of the School Food Environment with Dietary Behaviors of Young Adolescents.' American Journal of Public Health 1168,1168 (2003). 54. Healthy, Hunger -Free Act of 2010, S.3307, 111th Cong, 2nd Session (May 5, 2010). 55. French S, Story M, Fulkerson JA, at al. 'An Environmental Intervention to Promote Lower -Fat Food Choices in Secondary Schools: Outcomes of the TACOS Study." American Journal of Public Health, 94(9): 1507-1512,2004. 56. Sweet Deals: School Fundraising Can Be Healthy and Profitable. Washington: Center for Science in the Public Interest, February 2007. 57. Johanson J, Smith J and Wootan MG. Raw Deal: School Beverage Contracts Less Lucrative Than They Seem. Center for Science in the Public Interest and the Public Health Advocacy Institute, 2006 58. A study by Michele Polacsek, PhD, MHS, of the University of New England, presented at the American Public Health Association annual meeting in 2010, revealed that despite the new law, 85% of schools surveyed were not in compliance. 19 1 Obesity Prevention on a Budget www. leadershipfor liealthycommunities. orrg ABOUT THE PROGRAM Leadership for Healthy Communities is a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Copyright 2011 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. This brief was produced by Global Policy Solutions with direction from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) for RWJF's Leadership for Healthy Communities program. To request permission to reprint: If you wish to reprint any portion of this document, please visit http://www.rwjforg/policies/copywr ite.jsp. You'll need to download and complete the form that's linked from that page, email it to creativerequests @,rwjf.org and wait to receive a response. Smarter Choices for Concessions Offering healthier options at concession stands is part of a broader commitment by the City to encourage long -term, sustainable changes that make the healthy choice the easy choice where people live, work and play. Improving the selection of foods /beverages provided at concession venues will give patrons more opportunity to select foods /beverages that are lower in calories, fat, sugar and sodium. The cities of Bloomington, Edina and Richfield are using a set of minimum nutrition benchmarks to define healthier foods. These benchmarks, while not ideal, are a first step in the process of changing the community norm of selling primarily unhealthy foods and beverages at concession stands to selling an increased number of healthier options. The benchmarks are meant to incrementally improve the selection of foods and beverages available while at the same time allowing suppliers time to catch up with the increasing demand for healthier choices. These benchmarks are intended as the minimum — each,City can adopt stronger nutrition benchmarks. City concession stands are also encouraged to adopt recommended nutrition practices that promote healthier choices and /or incrementally improve the nutrition quality through portion control or a decrease in at least one benchmark nutrient to limit. Each city will determine the goal for the percentage of foods and beverages that meet these nutrition benchmarks, select the recommended nutrition practices to be implemented and set the timeline for implementation at each site. Minimum Nutrition Benchmarks for Concessions Foods (portion as served /sold) 1. Limit calories to 250 or less 2. Limit calories from total fat to 35% or less (excluding legumes, nuts, nut butters, seeds, eggs, non -fried vegetables, and cheese packaged for individual sale). 3. Limit calories from saturated fat to 10% or less (excluding cheese) 4. Limit trans fat to .5 grams or less 5. Limit sugar to 35% or less by weight 6. Limit sodium to 480 mg or less (meals 900 mg or less) Beverages 1. Plain water (Non- caffeinated, non - fortified) 2. Coffee and tea, plain 3. Non -fat or 1% low -fat milk, including soy, cow's milk, chocolate, or other flavored milk, containing no more than 22 grams of added sugar per 8 oz. serving 4. 100% fruit or vegetable juice (Can be combined with carbonated water, not to exceed 12 oz.) 5. Non- caloric beverages 7. Sports drinks (< 40 calories or less) 6. No_energy drinks. Recommended Nutrition Practices 1. Food items and beverages meeting the recommended nutrition standards should be sold at a price that is equivalent to or lower than the price of the remaining items within the concession stand that do not meet the nutrition standards. 2. Placement of healthier options will be, more visible and appealing; marketing of less healthier options will be limited. 3. A special or feature of the day is a healthier option 4. A menu labeling scheme is in place to differentiate healthier vs. unhealthy items. 5. Meal deals will include at least one healthier product (e.g. fruit or vegetable instead of chips). 6. Smaller portion sizes for less healthy food options will be sold (e.g., regular chips in 1.25 -ounce packages or less, no jumbo size hot dogs, no king size packaged candies). 7. No beverage shall have volumes of more than 20 ounces (except water). Regular soda no more than 12 ounces. Reduced price or free refills are not offered. 8. Whole grain products will be available. 9. Meal deals will offer a selection of fruit or, non -fried vegetable as a side dish. 10. Offer half- or reduced -size choices for some meals and concessions items (e.g. Y2 sandwich, cup of soup) 11. Products are the healthiest available option: a. Protein foods are lean meat, poultry, fish or low -fat vegetarian (not breaded or fried) b. Dairy products are 1% or skim c. Yogurt products are low fat and low sugar d. Canned /frozen fruit contains no added sugar e. Canned /frozen vegetables contain are lower sodium (< 480 mg sodium) f. Trans fat free oil is used *Guidelines /practices were adapted from the following: US Health and Human Services /General Services Administration Healthy and Sustainable Food Guidelines; the Alliance for Healthier Generations guidelines; Healthier US School Challenge guidelines; and input from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield.City staff. http: / /wWw.gsa.gov /graphics /pbs /Guidelines for Federal Concessions and Vending Operations.pdf http:// www. healthiergeneration .org /companies.aspx ?id =2540 http: / /www.fns.usda.gov /tn /healthierus /2012criteria chart.html Bloomington Public Health April 2012 Development of these guidelines and practices was made possible through funding from the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) of the Minnesota Department of Health. 0 1090 REPORPRECOM MEND \TION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. A. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK ❑ Discussion IK Information Date: SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is correspondence received after the packets were delivered to you. Susan Howl Subject: Work Session topics To Edina City officials, We strongly echo the comments brought forth below. The bottom line here is where are Edina's city officials' priorities? With the Edina home owners, tax payers and community supporters for their neighborhoods or with builders and developers for their profits. As we approach elections, we feel you owe it to the residents of Edina to disclose exactly how you feel about these issues. Respectfully, Dick and Jackie Whitbeck 6128 Brookview. Ave Edina, MN 55424 Mayor.Hovland and Edina City Council members Edina Planning Commission members City Manager Scott Neal City Planners Cary Teague and Kris Aaker To All of the Above, As a resident of the Pamela Park neighborhood for the past 24 years, I am writing to express my concern about the September 4th Work Session in regard to lot subdivision size and building height/grading. I strongly urge all parties to provide a foruln for the residents of this neighborhood, Which is currently in conflict over developers` subdivision of lots, tearing down of small homes, and building of oversized new homes, which are not in character with the neighborhood and fall into a much higher price range. Those of us who live here need to have a voice in the future of our neighborhood, as do other homeowners in Edina in a similar situation. I am discouraged to hear that builders are presenting their case as if they are experiencing some hardship. What about the hardships that are caused for the residents- - loss of privacy, light, and landscape - -as these new buildings encroach on what was once a reasonable space between homes? When I first heard about this meeting, I was pleased, thinking it meant that the City was interested in putting some constraints on developers so as to preserve the character of neighborhoods. Now I am worried that, in fact, the opposite may be the case. Please listen to your residents and thank you for reading this letter. I look forward to is r4- a balanced plan which provides opportunities for developers who adhere to reasonable guidelines and also respects the rights of current homeowners. Sincerely, Barbara Nelson To: Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council members Edina Planning Commission members City Manager Scott Neal City Planners Cary Teague and Kris Aaker To All of the Above, As an Edina Homeowner, I am greatly concerned about the apparent direction of discussion at the upcoming September 4th Work Session with the City Council and Planning Commission in regard to R -1 Lot Subdivision size and Building Height/grading. As I understand them, I find all three options that are being put on the table for discussion, to be very poor options. Two out of the three appear to be favoring builders that do not want to bother with consideration of their effect on the neighborhood, and seem to cut out a fair and balanced process for neighboring homeowners to speak up with any objections. To continue with the current case by case review process is not a good option either; it reflects an attitude of 'let's not fix a festering problem with tear -downs and new construction'. The City needs to start over, beginning with not only listening to certain builders' complaints about how they can't do whatever they please, but ALSO listening to homeowners and the issues they have had and continue to have with builders' tear -down projects. There must be a fair and balanced public process for this sensitive issue. I strongly urge the City to conduct at least three separate, open, public comment meetings that are well advertised to everyone that is a homeowner in Edina. Input from those meetings must then be considered to be of equal importance to what builders may be trying to push through for their own agendas. As homeowners, we LIVE here, whereas most of these builders and their subs do not. What is the objective for a change in the ordinances? It needs to be clearly defined, and currently is not. - -Janey Westin, Edina homeowner since 1980 6136 Brookview Ave., Edina Dear Sirs and Madams, As an Edina resident and homeowner of twenty fours years, i am very interested and very concerned about the discussion for the upcoming September 4th Work Session with the City Council and Planning Commission in regard to R -1 Lot Subdivision size and Building Height /grading. I understand there are three options up for discussion, and those may not be enough because two of them clearly favor builders who are interested in their bottom line, and not in living in the houses they hope to build. For this we need a many - layered public forum. Meanwhile; setbacks have to be carefully addressed, as they are primary to the future of home building in Edina, because they will affect the quality of life, rhythm, and comfort for established Edina homeowners. Many of,the established homeowners now reside in mid - sized, moderately priced houses, and if firm rules are not created for setbacks and house sizes, these same neighborhood residents will continue to see their housing values decline. If you own a,home that is modest, and enough of your block's homes get leveled to make room for gigantic houses, it's only a matter of time before you will have to sell low, in order to get any value out of your home. That is in essence the problem. Builders at this time would have a hard time paying full market value for a mid -sized Edina home, tear it down and build another one in its place, and also expect to make a decent profit. In my neighborhood, builders have been targeting folks who've fallen on hard times, and therefore behind on mortgage payments. These folks are manipulated into selling to builders because they know they will walk away with a clean bank slip. In truth, they walk away with a lot less money than if they had sold their houses in the normal fashion to another family or single person. Some of these builders are predators; some just want to make a quick buck. Many, many are decent business people for whom if you relax the rules, will build honestly and dutifully, but the rest of us will pay with a future of increasing lack of space and privacy and view, and finally, a decline in overall housing values. Please consider the many middle class families who live and work here, and send their children to Edina schools. We love this beautiful and quaint area, and want to protect its diversity and the ability to continue to enjoy our vibrant and homey neighborhoods. Respectfully, Mickie Turk Susan Howl September 3, 2012 Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council members Edina Planning Commission members City Manager Scott Neal City Planners Cary Teague and Kris Aaker Dear Mayor Hovland, As an Edina resident and homeowner of twenty fours years, I am very interested and very concerned about the discussion for the upcoming September 4th Work Session with the City Council and Planning Commission in regard to R -1 Lot Subdivision size and Building Height /grading. I understand there are three options up for discussion. Those may not be enough because two of them clearly favor builders who are interested in their bottom line, and not in living in the houses they hope to build. For this we need a many - layered public forum. Meanwhile, setbacks have to be carefully addressed, as they are primary to the future of home building in Edina, because they will affect the quality of life, rhythm, and comfort for established Edina homeowners. Many of the established homeowners now reside in mid - sized, moderately priced houses, and if firm rules are not created for setbacks and house sizes, these same neighborhood residents will continue to see their housing values decline. If you own a home that is modest, and enough of your block's homes get leveled to make room for gigantic houses, it's only a matter of time before you will have to sell low, in order to get any value out of your home. That is in essence the problem. Builders at this time would have a hard time paying full market value fora mid -sized Edina home, tear it down and build another one in its place, and also expect to make a decent profit. In my neighborhood, builders have been targeting folks who've fallen on hard times, and therefore behind on mortgage payments. These folks are manipulated into selling to builders because they know they will walk away with a clean bank slip. In truth, they walk away with a lot less money than if they had sold their houses in the normal fashion to another family or single person. Some of these builders are predators; some just want to make a quick buck. Many, many are decent business people for whom if you relax the rules, will build honestly and dutifully, but the rest of us will pay with a future of increasing lack of space and privacy and view, and finally, a decline in overall housing values. Please consider the many middle class families who live and work here, and send their children to Edina schools. We love this beautiful and quaint area, and want to protect its diversity and the ability to continue to enjoy our vibrant and homey neighborhoods. Respectfully, Mickie Turk mickieturkt giiiaiIsom 612 -382 -3182 Q-- W—A From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 9:21 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Consolidating and organizing solid waste collection in Edina Importance: High Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(oiEdinaMN.-gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living;,Lrarnin.g, Raising Families j- Doing Business From: Joan Wierzba mailtoJwierzba @comcast.netl Sent: Friday, August 31,. 2012.6:45 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2(&comcast.net; Mary Brindle; ioshsprague (bedinarealty.com; swensonann(a)gmail.com Cc: Scott Neal Subject: Fw: Consolidating and organizing solid waste collection in Edina Importance: High find it very interesting that 2 wks ago I sent all the Edina Council members an email and not one even took the time to respond. Very disappointing. Joan Wierzba From: Joan Wierzba Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:24 AM To: mail EdinaMN.gov ; ionibennettl2@)comcast.net ; mbrindle(abedinaMN.gov ; joshsprague@edinareaIty.com ; swwensonannCabgmail.com Cc: snealCa EdinaMN.gov Subject: Consolidating and organizing solid waste collection in Edina Mayor and City Council Members, I live in the Mendelssohn neighborhood and our roadway will be reconstructed in 2013. Although I am not happy about the cost, the road does need to be reconstructed. What I am unhappy about is the number and weight of the rubbish and recycling trucks that go up /down our streets weekly. Why go through the trouble of reconstructing streets and then allow such big and heavy trucks to travel our roads weekly? Over time they take a toll on the roads. I am urging Edina to consider limiting the number of rubbish trucks from our streets. Why not contract.with just one for the whole city or even consider dividing up the city into areas and give each rubbish company a contract for that area (that is if you don't want to limit the city to just one company). I understand some Twin Cities communities already have or have recently decided on this approach. It possibly could be a cost savings for the residents and would definitely be a savings for our roads. have contacted Scott Neal about this issue and he suggested I contact you directly. Thank you, Joan Wierzba 6217 Belmore Lane Edina 952 - 931 -0855 Susan Howl Subject: It still isn't a done deal.... You may have heard of.the recent decision by Hennepin County to replace the aging freight tracks on the Kenilworth corridor. (see Aug 2.9, 2012 Finance and Commerce article below) Some have suggested that this expensive action by Hennepin County indicates that co- location of freight and light rail is imminent versus freight rail re- location to the MN &S corridor in St. Louis Park: Safety in the Park! was made aware of this request by the railroads shortly after the group began organizing over two years ago. In further discussions with the TC &W, we have been assured, and we strongly believe, that this development has no bearing whatsoever on the decision to re -route or co- locate freight rail. The tracks were simply old, unsafe, and needed replacement. However, what is extremely troubling is Mayor Jacobs' quote for the article - "The city's official position is that we don't want a reroute if we can avoid it but I personally ... have come to the conclusion that it's going to happen," What? The Met Council,is a year or'more away from a decision about the freight trains. The city has published multiple resolutions opposing the freight rail re -route if other alternatives exist. The engineering firm SEH concluded that one alternative: co- location on the Kenilworth corridor is not only viable but is tens of millions of dollars less expensive than an SLP re- route. The.Kenilworth corridor is a superior corridor in all aspects- it is straighter, flatter, has generally wider right -of -way, is not elevated, has far fewer auto /pedestrian crossings and doesn't pass within 75 feet of a high school as the SLP route does. Why would the Mayor make such a statement after the council voted to pass the resolutions-and after participating in two evenings of city -wide listening sessions in which every single resident who spoke opposed the re- route? If you disagree with the Mayor's position, please call or write. Here is his contact information provided on the city's website. Home:'(952) 927 -8o67 Office: '(952) 897 -wo7 Email jacobs]effrel7(@corncast.tiet Hennepin County may be forced to replace tracks though reroute Posted: 4:15 pm Wed, August 29, 2012 By Drew Kerr Tags: Jeff Jacobs; Kenilworth Corridor, Mark Fuhrrnann. Metropolitan Council, Southwest Corridor, Southwest LRT, Tim Jeske. Twin Cities Western; Twin Cities Western Railroad " Hennepin County leaders have agreed to spend $1.2 million.upgrading old tracks on a two -mile stretch of the'Kenilworth Corridor, which run between Interstate 394 and Beltline Boulevard, in St. Louis Park. The county owns the line and leases it to Twin Cities Western Railroad. (Staff photo: Bill Klotz) $1.2 million will be spent on upgrades to handle freight.trains Hennepin County will spend $1.2 million replacing aging rail tracks in a two -mile stretch of the Kenilworth Corridor even though a new light -rail transit line ultimately may force them to be moved. County officials say the tracks need to be replaced because they aren't equipped to handle the larger, heavier freight cars that have become the industry standard. Though the tracks were installed in the 1990s, they were actually manufactured in the 1920s. Running between Interstate 394 and Beltline Boulevard, in St. Louis Park, the tracks were supposed to be used only for a few years, but have remained because the prospect of a freight rail reroute through that city has been so controversial. While the tracks have passed routine inspections, county officials fear a repeat of a 2010 derailment. In that case, a track split caused eight freight rail cars to veer off track near Lake Calhoun, causing $80,000 in damage. Hennepin County has agreed to split the costs from that incident and to pay for the rail replacement as part of an agreement with Glcncoe- Inmed'11 +in Cities Western Railroad, which leases the line. The county purchased the tracks in 1984 for $6.5 million and Twin Cities Western pays the county based on how many trips its freight cars take. The payments have been around $3,000 a month, and the money is largely directed toward repairs on the line. After years of patchwork repairs, Tim Jeske, the director of mechanical and maintenance for Twin Cities Western. said he hopes the wholesale track replacement will allow the company to bring more trains onto the corridor. Today, the line sees just a few trips a day. Lumber, grain, coal and ethanol move along the route. "The trend in the railroad industry is to have heavier cars and longer trains," Jeske said. `This will help get that traffic through here safely.` The county's work comes despite the fact that freight cars could be forced out of the Kenilworth Corridor. The Metropolitan Council has identified the corridor as an ideal route for the Southwest Light Rail Transit line, which would run 15 miles from Minneapolis to Eden Prairie. The concern is that the corridor will not be wide enough for freight and light rail traffic, as well as an adjacent hike trail. An environmental study looking at the costs of rerouting freight rail is due this fall, and engineering of the LRT line is slated to begin next year. The hope is to put the line into service in 2017. The Met Council's director of light -rail projects, Mark Fuhrmann, was unavailable on Wednesday, and the agency released a statement saying only that the engineering work will give a "better idea of the alternatives, costs and timeline for the potential relocation and co- location alternatives 1'or the freight rail line." St. Louis Park officials have objected to reroute plans because it could mean moving freight traffic to a corridor that passes the St. Louis Park High School as well as taking some industrial and residential properties. While a decision hasn't been made, Mayor Jeff Jacobs said he has begun to accept that a reroute is likely. His focus now is on limiting the impacts. "The city's official position is that we don't want a reroute if we can avoid it but I personally ... have come to the conclusion that it's going to happen," Jacobs said. "The question is what can we do to mitigate the impacts ?" Twin Cities Western has agreed to buy the tracks if the freight rail line is rerouted, allowing the county to recoup around $300,000.'rhe county also hopes to get $60,000 from selling the existing tracks. The county decided to move ahead with the project because of the potential for cost recovery and the belief that there will likely be several more years of freight operations on the line. said Phil Eckhert, the director of I lenncpin County' Housing. Community Works & Transit department. "Even if it is moved, we'll be able to recapture some of the value, so this isn't going to be a stranded investment." he said. Freight rail service will not be disrupted during the work, which is expected to begin in mid - October. Delays on West 21st Street and Cedar Lake Parkway are likely to occur on Sept. 10 as 1,500- to 1,800 -foot sections track are unloaded, however. The Cedar Lake Bike Trail will not be affected. Susan Howl Subject: Work Session topic - Subdivisions To Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council members Edina Planning Commission members City Manager Scott Neal City Planners Cary Teague and Kris Aaker To All of the Above, As an Edina Homeowner, I am greatly concerned about the apparent direction of discussion at the upcoming September 4th Work Session with the City Council and Planning Commission in regard to R -1 Lot Subdivision size and Building Height /grading. As I understand them, I find all three options that are being put on the table for discussion, to be very poor options. Two out of the three appear to be favoring builders that do not want to bother with consideration of their effect on the neighborhood, and seem to cut out a fair and balanced.process for neighboring homeowners to speak up with any objections. To continue with the current case by case review process is not a good option either; it reflects an attitude of 'let's not fix a festering problem with tear -downs and new construction'. The City needs to start over, beginning with not only listening to certain builders' complaints about how they can't do whatever they please, but ALSO listening to homeowners and the issues they have had and continue to have with builders' tear -down projects. There must be a fair and balanced public process for this sensitive issue. I strongly urge the City to conduct at least three separate, open, public comment meetings that are well advertised to everyone that is a homeowner in Edina. Input from those meetings must then be considered to be of equal importance to what builders may be trying to push through for their own agendas. As homeowners, we LIVE here, whereas most of these builders and their subs do not. What is the objective for a change in the ordinances? It needs to be clearly defined, and currently.is not. - -Janet' Westin, Edina homeowner since 1980 6136 Brookview Ave., Edina Susan Howl Subject: Work Session Topic -- Subdivisions Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council members Edina Planning Commission members City Manager Scott Neal City Planners Cary Teague and Kris Aaker To All of the Above, As a resident of the Pamela Park neighborhood for the past 24 years, I am writing to express my concern about the September 4th Work Session in regard to lot subdivision size and building height /grading. I strongly urge all parties to provide a forum for the residents of this neighborhood, which is currently in conflict over developers' subdivision of,lots, tearing down of small homes, and building of oversized, new homes, which are not in character with the neighborhood and fall'into a much higher price range. Those of us who live here need to have a voice in the future of our neighborhood, as do other homeowners in Edina in a similar situation. I am discouraged to hear that builders are presenting their case as if they are experiencing, some hardship. What about the hardships that are caused for the residents -- loss of privacy, light, and landscape - -as these new buildings encroach on what was once a reasonable space between homes? When I first heard about this meeting, I was pleased, thinking it meant that the City was interested in putting some constraints on developers so as to preserve the character of neighborhoods. Now I am worried that, in fact, the opposite may be the case. Please listen to your residents and thank you for reading this letter. I look forward to a balanced plan which provides opportunities for developers who adhere to reasonable guidelines and also respects the rights of current homeowners. Sincerely, Barbara Nelson 1 Mickie Turk 6141 Brookview Avenue Edina, MN 55424 September 3, 2012 Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council members Edina Planning Commission members City Manager Scott Neal City Planners Cary Teague and Kris Aaker Dear Sirs and Madams, As an Edina resident and homeowner of twenty fours years, I am very interested and very concerned about the discussion for the upcoming September 4th Work Session with the City Council and Planning Commission in regard to R -1 Lot Subdivision size and Building Height /grading. I understand there are three options up for discussion. Those may not be enough because two of them clearly favor builders who are interested in their bottom line, and not in living in the houses they hope to build. For this we need a many - layered public forum. Meanwhile, setbacks have to be carefully addressed, as they are primary to the future of home building in Edina, because they will affect the quality of life, rhythm, and comfort for established Edina homeowners. Many of the established homeowners now reside in mid - sized, moderately priced houses, and if firm rules are not created for setbacks and house sizes, these same neighborhood residents will continue to see their housing values decline. If you own a home that is modest, and enough of your block's homes get leveled to make room for gigantic houses, it's only a matter of time before you will have to sell low, in order to get any value out of your home. That is in essence the problem. Builders at this time would have a hard time paying full market value for a mid -sized Edina home, tear it down and build another one in its place, and also expect to make a decent profit. In my neighborhood, builders have been targeting folks who've fallen on hard times, and therefore behind on mortgage payments. These folks are manipulated into selling to builders because they know they will walk away with a clean bank slip. In truth, they walk away with a lot less money than if they had sold their houses in the normal fashion to another family or single person. Some of these builders are predators; some just want to make a quick buck. Many, many are decent business people for whom if you relax the rules, will build honestly and dutifully, but the rest of us will pay with a future of increasing lack of space and privacy and view, and finally, a decline in overall housing values. Please consider the many middle class families who live and work here, and send their children to Edina schools. We love this beautiful and quaint area, and want to protect its diversity and the ability to continue to enjoy our vibrant and homey neighborhoods. Respectfully, Mickie Turk DATE: September 3, 2012 TO: Mayor Jim Hovland, Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, Ann Swenson, City of Edina Cc: City,; Councils of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Richfield, Hopkins FROM: Jeff Strate, 15921 Summerhill Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Phone:, 952- 949 -8980 Re: Public. access television programming, studio and playback facilities for Hopkins, Minnetonka, Richfield, Eden Prairie and Edina.. Dear Mayor and Council Members, First of all, thank you for the considerations, conversations, thoughts and deliberations that you have contributed to the concerns and perspectives of the public access producers who have operated from the former Southwest Community TV studio in Eden Prairie. We have begun to build for the future. I am requesting prompt consideration of a narrow request pertaining to the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission's task to provide a plan for future PEG programming, production and transmission. I am urging each City Council to act on this request before October. Jeff Strate, Producer, Democratic Visions DFL Senate District 48 REQUESTED ACTION Direct the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission to include as part of its process to research, evaluate, formulate and to recommend to its member cities, a plan for public access cable television production facilities and playback systems: 1) Two knowledgeable and experienced public access producers who are residents of one of member cities, W From Jeff Strate, 9/3/2012 2) A public or commercial television producer, and P.2of8 3) An access studio & facilities managers; and 4) alternates for the above. Rationale Supporting the Requested Action: The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) recommendation to approve the contract and then to assign its members — elected and municipal officials - with little or no television or public access studio /channel experience to over the next year figure out its future: 1) Is not in the best interest of Comeast Cable subscribers in particular or of the residents of the 5 cities; 2) Ignores the advantage of having direct, at- the -table contact with professional and access producers and access managers with real work and real project experience outside of municipal and school district operations; 3) Risks perpetuating a situation that has long restrained our local public access studio from becoming the rich, more inclusive kind of community resource found in other metro area communities. 4) Risks subjecting public access television to political, editorial and institutional biases of municipal governments and school districts. Elaboration: Prior to the cable franchise contract approvals. The five city councils of the southwest suburban cable group were provided little time to consider and review the facts and the complex issues that define public access television, its funding, its purpose and its performance locally and regionally and its role in the well being and vitality of our respective communities and the nation. Only Minnetonka and Richfield held public hearings. Access producers greatly appreciate the two hearings as well as the opportunities to speak in non - hearing council deliberations in Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. We also From Jeff Strate, 9/3/2012 P. 3 of 8 greatly appreciate the Edina and Hopkins council members and staff members who talked with us on the phone and/or read our respective letters and materials. An important component of what producers were saying were responses to the distortion of the operation and use of the Eden Prairie access studio; Channel 15 programming and the role of public access TV by SWSCC administrator Brian Grogan and the May 25, 2010 report "Southwest Cable Communications Commission PEG Access Needs Assessment." Holly Hansen Consulting prepared this report. The report was accepted by the SWSCC and was referred to -by Mr. Grogan during his presentations. By omission -the report is incomplete and misleading and was seemingly crafted to serve the narrow interests of city government communication offices rather than the community whole. An example: Not one public access producer was approached by IIolly Hansen Consulting, by SWSCC members or their administrator for the report. It is also my understanding that not a single commissioner or its administrator questioned the adequacy of the report. Further more, it should be noted that some council members in Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Richfield and Edina, did express dissatisfaction with the adequacy of the report and the manner in which the cable franchise renewal deliberations were being handled. Another example: The report states that in 2009, Channel 15 aired only 164 programs that were made by only 13 producers in the local Eden Prairie studio but aired 954 programs from elsewhere. Cable commission administrator Brian Grogan's spin to city councils has been that (my paraphrase): the report shows that there is little demand for a public access production studio and strongly suggests that access . programming from outside our 5-city cable group will be good enough. A high percentage of all the programming carried by all TV stations and public access studios and channels is produced in other places. For example, TPT2 (KTCA) produces a very small fraction of the programs it airs. So too, commercial television stations and the Minnesota Channel From Jeff Strate, 9/3/2012 _ P. 4 of-8 (state -wide and Western: Wisconsin public television). Many of the Minnesota Channel programs are, in fact, assembled at public access studios by unpaid, volunteer producers, crewmembers and editors. Among these is BelAhdan, produced by Minnetonka resident Ahmed Tharwat. in the Eden Prairie studio that has been shut down. And,. another example: The studio was never as available for citizen use as the study and Mr. Grogan's presentations suggested. It was closed on weekends, and Monday and Friday evenings. Because the facility had only one recording machine, the.studio was closed When that deck Was used for editing in the control room. The studio was noVavailable when Comeasi and its predecessors rented studio cameras for the recording of on- location events such as Chamber. of Commerce - meetings; when it was reserved for training; when its osole manager, Michelle Glynn, was on vacation, on sick leave; or when the few video decks, audio and switching equipment needed repair. Inadequate Performance by the SWSCC and its Administrator It became apparent over the past six weeks that. the SWSCC and administrator Brian Grogan failed to provide it, their respective cities and their resident public access producers with a timely transitional plan for both short and long terns. Mr. Grogan has since publicly acknowledged this shortcoming. The corrective moves that have made over the past six weeks are appreciated but were cobbled together quickly only because city councils agreed with the producers. Again, it is my position that decision and policy generating deliberations by the SWSCC will benefit from having actual,access producers and managers at their meetings and sub - committee and executive committee meetings. .Review of recent actions With its City Council vote on August 13, 2012 Richfield became the last off the southwest cable group cities to approve the cable "ry franchise From Jeff Strate, 9/3/2012 P.5of8 contract. The SWSCC has recommended that it be provided a year to figure out the future of PEG Access Cable TV and how increased subscriber access fees for PEG channels, original programming and distribution will be spent. The official alert to access producers that the Eden Prairie based, Comcast operated, access studio would shut down on August 1, 2012 was made a little more than a week in advance. Some of the access producers had reserved studio time in August and September. Producers and council members in Eden Prairie, Edina and Minnetonka and at least one city manager had thought that the Eden Prairie based access studio would continue to operate for a frill year. But on May 17, 2012 council members in Eden Prairie and Edina began to learn otherwise during non -public hearing deliberations pegged to a presentation describing and recommending the proposed contract. Because of perspectives provided by producers to the Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield City Councils and subsequent discussions and directives made in Minnetonka, Edina and Eden Prairie, the SWSCC; administrator was able to accomplish several short -term solutions: 1) Comcast agreed to keep its access studio open through August to accommodate producers who had not been provided timely notice for the August 1 closure date. Producers were officially notified of the closure postponement via email on August 1, 2012. The monthly access program that I produce for DFL Senate District 48, having taped enough studio segments to serve it through mid - November, did not return to the Comcast studio. 2) On August 23, 2012, SW Community TV access producers were notified by the SWSCC administrator via email that arrangements had been made with the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission that qualified SW Community TV producers could use its access production studio and editing suites in Spring Park from September 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. (See below) 3) On July 30, 2012, access producers were officially informed via email by Comcast access studio manager Michelle Glynn that Channel 15 would I From Jeff Strate, 9/3/2012 continue to operate for a year under the same terms for program submission that have been in place for a number of years. Ms. Glynn (whose new title at Comcast is LO /Access SI)ecialist, included an attachment of the SW Community TV guide lines. These recent actions were only initiated after citizen producers and the respective city councils had become aware of what was happening to public access television in their communities. Some council members have come to realize that the little known resource has been squandered by their city governments, school districts and community service groups. I do not claim to represent the other access producers who, because of the manner in which local public access production has operated, barely know one another, I cari, however, .confidently assume that they too appreciate recent corrective actions even though they are planted with many a hurdle. Some SW Community TV programs like Lets Learn to Get Along with Lisa Butts, will most likely be unable to use the Spring Park facility. Taking advantage of one of the best tenants of access television production, our SW producers, with little or no training.in.studio production, set design, editing, lighting and engineering, were able to assemble from one to three, ready -to -air programs in a single two to four.hour session at the Eden Prairie studio. Thatis not possible at the'Spring Park. I am responding positively to the situation, but if SW access producers had been recruited to assist in the search for temporary studio, space, a better alternative might have been arranged for programs like Lisa Butt's. My perspective is not saddled to the ambitions of Democratic Visions, the program I produce for DFL Senate District 48. It is shaped from an experience that demonstrates that access cable TV has an important role in the well being of communities; it provides engaging portals for a richly textured and diverse citizenry who are ignored or shut out from local and regional media or get lost in social medias blizzard of messages. During the August 6`h Minnetonka City Council Hearing on the franchise contract, Member Brad Weirsum recognized that value and spoke of it to his council colleagues: From Jeff Strate, 9/3/2012 P.7of8 " ... It is not that we can't change. I think we have to change [the access studio] is pretty clear, but to change over a period of 45 days for something as involved as this with no solution in hand - just a plan to study it - to me feels like a real weakness in our plan. ... I've been on the council 9 years; this is the most diverse group I have ever seen in this council chamber. And when I hear that we are taking away a voice away people who don't have a voice. To me that is a critical issue and that deserves more than forty -five days." — Brad Weirsum, Minnetonka City Council Member. In approximately one year, the SWSCC hopes that a new, independently operated playback facility will be in place to continue the transmission of Public, Education and Government access programs and that a plan will have been submitted for consideration or have actually been approved for a permanent access production facility or some variation of same. But public access facilities and public access channel 15 remains at high risk if the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission does not include access producers, access managers and one or two professionals from public and/or commercial television in drawing up a plan. I understand that the recurring tone and omissions of the commission's analysis of public access production and Channel 15 and Mr. Grogan's presentations to the city councils were building a case to abandon the public access concept and the resource. I also understand that public access resources thrive and are of value to communities when they operate independent of municipal government; when they are shielded from government's editorial _control; and when citizens know that they can use it. With wannest regards, Jeff Strate, Producer Democratic Visions DFL Senate District 48 — Eden Prairie /Minnetonka Ahmed Tharwart, Producer/Host, BelAhdan From Jeff Strate, 9/3/2012 P. 8 of 8 Jeff Strate's Background For the past three and one half years I have produced Democratic Visions with other volunteers from Eden Prairie, Edina and Minnetonka for DFL Senate District 48 (formerly 42). The monthly, half -hour program features studio' discussions and taped on location segments, satire and commentary. For approximately 15 years, Democratic Visions has been one of the on -going programs produced at the public access studio serving the 5 -city cable service district for Channel 15 I became one of the nation's pioneering public access producers at University Community Video at the U of M in,the mid- I970's moving on to produce, host or report for KTCA, WGBH, WNET, NJN,'KSTP and WNYW (New York). My work has also appeared on PBS, HBO and the Travel Channel, teleconferences and videos. for organizations ranging from Fortune 500 companies to small, local non - profit agencies and community groups. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 2:08 PM To: Cary Teague; 'Arlene Forrest'; Benjamin Kilberg; Emily Cherkassky; Floyd Grabiel; 'Jeffrey Carpenter'; Ken Potts (potts03 @gmail.com); 'Kevin Staunton'; 'Michael Fischer'; Michael Platteter (platteters @comcast.net); 'Michael Schroeder' Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Message for Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, the Planning Commission members and Cary Teague. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist E7 ; l'`'y' ` 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ifi F IbiunnoCrDEdinaMN.gov ! www.EdinaMN.c ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business ... ... .. ..... _.._ _..........._ .. . . From: Jane Lonnquist Lmailto :jjlonnquist(&earthlink.net1 Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 2:00 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Message for Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, First, a hearty THANK YOU for supporting the Country Club neighbors who felt that the new JMS construction proposed for Bruce Avenue didn't suit the neighborhood. Having worked hard in 2008 to add some "teeth" to Country Club's Plan of Treatment, it was gratifying to hear your comments and your resolve to honor the historic integrity of our district. Thanks! Second, I understand that side -yard setbacks will be considered this evening. I hope that your discussion will address the following: do set -back stipulations dictate the distance of'the foundation from the property line, or may a building begin at the minimum set -back regardless of height and be "stair- stepped" back as it grows taller to meet set -back rules? When Great Neighborhood Homes re -did the home next to me, it built a two -story addition set back five feet from the property line. The addition is inset on the second story to meet set -back rules. I was told at the time by Planning that this is acceptable, but it certainly doesn't seem to honor the letter of the law. The demand for in -fill housing in Edina is strong -- you can afford to set very high standards for developers (and residents like me are hoping that you will!) Sincerely, Jane Lonnquist 4510 Drexel Avenue 952 - 926 -3725 w -;, Scott Neal, City Manager 952-826-04011 Fax 952 -826 -0390 sneal(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ,- ...For Living, Learning, Paising Families & Doing Business From: Mark Brinkman Imailto: MBrinkman @constructionmaterialsinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:24 PM To: ihovland(a)krausehoviand.com; Scott Neal; ionibennettl2 @comcast.net Cc: pasidell@comcast.net Subject: Landscaping on city lot adjacent to 4234 Lynn Ave Mayor Hovland, Mr. Neal and Ms. Bennett,. My name is Mark Brinkman, I live at 4243 Lynn Avenue. I am writing you to express my concern with the decision making process on Landscaping the City Owned lot adjacent to the home being built at 4343 Lynn. A few of my thoughts, observations and understanding of the project are: 1. It is pretty obvious that the grading and work involved with construction of the new home required encroachment and some minor temporary damage to the adjacent city lot. 2. It is also known that Lynn Avenue residents, Mr.'s Rudnicki and Parrish have voiced their displeasure about this encroachment and damage on the City jot with the City as well as other neighbors. 3. 1 also understand that the City has hired a Landscape Architect to design a plan for the city lot and is going forward with the plan and Re- Landscaping the City owned lot. To each of these thoughts and observations I would answer: 1. Our new neighbors have decided to build a beautiful home and enhance our city and in particular our street and neighborhood. Obviously building a new home is going to result in some damage to the lot it is being built on and in this case some moderate but easily repairable damage to the neighboring city lot. It seems the new homeowner and builder have gone to great lengths to protect the property with silt fence and have re- graded the city lot to an improved condition. Hardly seems to me they have done anything wrong. 2. Mr. Rudnicki and Mr. Parrish have expressed their displeasure with the project — I don't happen to share their opinion, but they have the right to their opinion. 3. The City of Edina owns the adjacent lot — if the city desires to make enhancements or improvements to the lot — great, we all benefit as residents from the improvement. What troubles me on this is instead how this has been handled by the City of Edina. It seems to me that the homeowner and builder of the new home have done their best during reconstruction of their lot and appeared to have been well on their way to restoring the city lot to at least "as was" or possibly an even better condition — which should be at the very least what is required and more than satisfactory to the City of Edina. Then you have Rudnicki and Parrish complain and instead of telling them that you will make sure the City lot is restored to original condition you hire an architect and plan for re- landscaping and solicit for their opinion of the Architect's Plan. Once you decided to do this shouldn't you have opened the door for other neighbor's opinions or comments? Unless of course Rudnicki and Parrish are paying for this it would seem that this should have been a logical step in the process and the step that the city should have taken. Once again, I just wanted to express my opinion and be afforded the opportunity to point out where I feel the city has erred in the process — and would welcome your comments or rebuttal. Thank you, MARK BRINKMAN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, INC. 6725 OXFORD STREET SAINT Louis PARK, MN 55426 800 -486 -8456 952 - 929 -0431 612-802-5015(CELL) 952-929-0737(FAX) m br inkman aconstructionmaterialsinc.com www .constructionmaterialsinc.com Scott Neal From: Mark Brinkman < MBrinkman @constructionmaterialsinc.com> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 201211:41 AM To: Scott Neal Subject: RE: Landscaping on city lot adjacent to 4234 Lynn Ave Thank you, MARK BRINKMAN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, INC. 6725 OXFORD STREET SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 800- 486 -8456 952 - 929 -0431 612-802-501 5(CELL) 952-929-0737(FAX) mbrinkman (a)constructionmaterialsinc.com www .constructionmaterialsinc.com From: Scott Neal [mailto:sneal(95)EdinaMN.gov1 Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11 :31 AM To: Mark Brinkman Subject: RE: Landscaping on city lot adjacent to 4234 Lynn Ave Mr. Brinkman — I think you've described this situation to a.tee. _We.(the City) have not handled this as well as we should have. The trees we removed earlier this week needed to be removed, but before we go any further with implementing the proposed restoration plan, we are going to figure out a way to solicit more neighborhood input. I will be meeting with my staff tomorrow to. -put.a little process together. We will be back in touch with you and your neighbors before any additional restoration activities take place. Scott Neal From: Timothy J. Rudnicki <RudnickiLaw @q.com> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 9:19 AM To: James Hovland; Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle; Josh Sprague; Ann Swenson; Scott Neal; Rob Parish Subject: Call For Restoration -- Littel & Lynn City Open Space Attachments: Call for restoration Littel & Lynn 08262012_0082.pdf Importance: High Mayor James Hovland; City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson; and City Manager Scott Neal -- Late Friday afternoon, just a few days after more trees were removed on City property, the City Manager announced the suspension of the replanting project. Twenty -nine (29) local residents express support for the attached replanting landscape restoration plan (Rev. 8/16/2012). While one resident expressed concern regarding the "sliding hill," a simple realignment of one blaze maple tree can correct the situation. Residents are concerned about how the City property at Littel and Lynn Avenue has been treated by the builder and want a speedy restoration of the property according to the attached landscape restoration plan (Rev. 8/16/2012) with the builder being held solely responsible for all associated restoration costs. We respectfully request the suspension on the replanting project be lifted and the landscape restoration plan (Rev. 8/16/2012), or one substantially similar, be immediately implemented. Thank you. Respectfully submitted by Tim Rudnicki on behalf of the residents listed in the attached file. 952.915.1505 To: Mayor James Hovland; City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson; and City Manager Scott Neal From: Residents of the City of Edina Morningside Neighborhood Date: August 2012 Re: Proposed Landscaping Plan for the City Property at the corner of Littel and Lynn and adjacent to 4234 Lynn Avenue I am concerned about how the City property at Littel and Lynn Avenue has been treated by the builder and want a speedy restoration of the property according to the attached landscape restoration plan (Rev. 8/16/2012). The builder should be solely responsible for all associated restoration costs. Thank you. Print Name Signature Address 7 YJ 1-1 r To: Mayor James 1 lowland; City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary. Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson; and City Manager Scott Neal From: Residents of the City of Edina Momingside Neighborhood Date: August 2012 Re: Proposed Landscaping Plan for the City Property at the corner of Littel. and Lynn and adjacent to 4234 Lynn Avenue I am concerned about how the City property at. Littel and Lynn Avenue has been treated by the Builder and want a speedy restoration of the property according to the attached landscape restoration plan (Rev. 8/16/2012). The builder should be solely responsible for all associated restoration costs. Thank. you. Print Name Signature Address (i �` ,J n f a i . Ui 1. ,JV l' Vk/ r /'t ;j n.l €- �j' \,� ?�.{ "�. t:..l�,. a 1: 4�4f :i �,' l j"�; %`•'V ' To: Mayor James 1-lovland; City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and. Ann Swenson; and City Manager Scott Neal From: Residents of the City of Edina Morningside lleighborliood. Date; August 2012 Re: Proposed Landscaping Plan for the City Property at the corner of Littel and Lynn and adjacent -to 4234 Lynn Avenue I am concerned about how the City property at Littel and Lynn Avenue has been treated by the builder and want a speedy restoration of the property according to the attached landscape restoration plan (Rev. 3!16%2012). The builder should be solely responsible for all associated restoration costs. Thank You. Print Name Signature Address r 4 t To: Mayor James Hovland; City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson; and City Manager Scott Neal From: Residents of the City of Edina Momingside Neighborhood Date: August 2012 Re: Proposed Landscaping Plan for the City Property at the corner of Littel and Lynn and adjacent to 4234 Lynn Avenue I am concerned about how the City property at Littel and Lynn Avenue has been treated by the builder and want a speedy restoration of the property according to the attached landscape restoration plan (Rev. 8/16/2012). The builder should be solely responsible for all associated restoration costs. Thank you. Print Name Signature Address Pol 49 4y47' -7 � ' ^ 1 / • v / / , - - - -V) To: Mayor James Hovland; City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson; and City Manager Scott Neal From: Residents of the City of Edina Morningside:Neighbortido . Date: August 2012 Re: Proposed Landscaping Plan for the ..City. Property: at the corner of Littel and Lynn and adjacentito 4234.Lynn Avenue I am concerned about how the City property at Littel and Lynn Avenue has been treated by the builder and, want a speedy restoration of the property according to the attached landscape restoration plan (Rev. 8/16/2012): The builder should be solely responsible for all associated restoration costs. Thank you. Print Name Signature Address VII n �/�.'�� �e� l�v • ` yoZlf LITTEL STREET 1 , -60' TREE TO REMAIN j SR- TREE TO REMAIN j I 36' TREE TO REMAIN 21' MAPLE - + 2;' MAPLE i � 1 60' TREE TO REMAIN AND BE TRIMMED 1 36' TREE TO REMAIN AND BE TRIMMED 5 APPROXIMATE LIMITS — OF EXISTING GRADING MAPLE r'' FINE GRADE, FERTXLVE, REMOVE 10' TREE ` u` DOGWOOD SEED AND MULCH AREA Mpp� OISTURBEO BV GRADING REMOVE 76' TREE ' APPROXIMATE LIMITS DOGWOOD DOGWOOD �`(/�.� DOGWOOD OF EXISTING GRADING 3 CJ3 S ( 1 ] C.G.S. rM/ REMOVE 74' TREE 1 / 3 C.B.S. _ REMOVE 6' TREE Z _ 3 O.G.S. 6 —... -- y - V e BOULDER RETAINING WALL (VARYING HEIGHT I' TO 101 i yA C LEGEND — —_ — — LIMITS OF GRADING M 1 l G,.' EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN I REMAIN AND BE TRIMMED PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE t i PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE 4234 LYNN AVE HOUSE UNDER CONSTRUCTION NOTES RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 4' TO 101 1. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND STUMP WHERE INDICATED. 2. TRIM AND PRUNE EXISTING TREE WHERE INDICATED. 3. PROTECT EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. 4. FURNISH AND PLANT 12 (8' HIGH) CONIFEROUS TREES. 5. FURNISH AND PLANT 4 (2}" CALIPER) DECIDUOUS TREES. 6. FINE GRADE, FERTILIZE, SEED AND MULCH AREA DISTURBED BY GRADING (MULCH TO BE STRAW BLANKETS). PLANT LIST W M Z = W Q Z O cn Z J 0© 0 COLORADO GREEN SPRUCE, 8' HIGH, BALL AND BURLAP, 6 EACH COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE, B' HIGH, BALL AND BURLAP, 6 EACH AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE, 2}" CALIPER, BALL AND BURLAP, 4 EACH CARDINAL RED DOGWOOD, #10 CONTAINER, 4 EACH CUTLEAF TIGER EYES SUMAC, #10 CONTAINER, 6 EACH r� � sl•I �I H ae °s w Ix Yd! :a o- • 4. Y s�Y a<? z W W LL 9s 03� vG — � W V ZO O O F W W t j > J Q m = t _ W O J ==x 03 S� au u W T- 7: N a Z tai e ..S Y `LEGEND b n1 I _ V _ �(r TNEE TO REMAIN �- 2j "6UtPLE � LITTEL STREET GO" TREE TO REMAIN 50` TREE TO REMAIN - -.\ (1� 1J" MAPLF SO- TREE TO RE6WN AND BE TRIMMED �1 30" TREE TO REMAIN ANO BE TRIMMED' ` 1 APPROXIMATE LIMBS Of EXISTING GRADING MAPLE � FINE GRADE, FERTILIZE, REMOVE 10' TREE ` DOGWOOD SEED AND MULCH AREA f REMOVE JA- TRF.1: �, MAPS DISTURBED BY GRADING I I DOGWOOD OOGWOOD� y.�, I—DOGWOOD AVPROXIMATE LIMITS �� �(`"M71J OF EXISTING GRADING 3 C.H.S. f�REMGVE 1d' TREE 1 C.G.S.\ I MMM777! REMOVE 0' TREE , - � 3 C.G.S. f B ' y i BOULDER RETAINING WALL �B DRYING RETAINING WALL (VARYING HEIGHT <' TO 10') (VARYING HEIGHT �' TO 10'1 4234 LYNN AVE 1 HOUSE UNDER — — — -LIMITS OF GRADING EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN I REMAIN AND BE TRIMMED OPROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. REMOVE EXISTING TREE AND STUMP WHERE INDICATED 2. TRIM AND PRUNE EXISTING TREE WHERE INDICATED. 3. PROTECT EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. 4. FURNISH AND PLANT 12 (8' HIGH) CONIFEROUS TREES. S. FURNISH AND PLANT 4121- CALIPER) DECIDUOUS TREES 6. FINE GRADE, FERTILIZE, SEED AND MULCH AREA DISTURBED BY GRADING (MULCH TO BE STRAW BLANKETS). PLANT LIST W D Z = W E Q J Z (n Z J 0 10 20 COLORADO GREEN SPRUCE, 8' HIGH, BALL AND BURLAP. G EACH COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE, S' HIGH, BALL AND BURLAP, 6 EACH AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE, 21° CALIPER, BALL AND BURLAP. 4 EACH CARDINAL RED DOGWOOD, 010 CONTAINER, 4 EACH CUTLEAF TIGER EYES SUMAC, R10 CONTAINER, 6 EACH N al bl sl m y 3 W .r r:= zt s ' C G C H Q 7. LU W I' U. RY c) W U 0 O I,• z w V Q Q W J b Q (O F Z =o> oar O V ° x� 5� r .. n Scott Neal From: Tom & Judy Plant <jplantl @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:01 PM To: Ross Bintner Cc: Scott Neal Subject: City -owned Lot at Lynn Ave & Littel St Dear Mr. Bintner- We received the lovely restoration plan for the city lot at the corner of Lynn and Littel Saturday. The plan has my husband's and my approval and we're looking forward to seeing it put in place. Thank you for sending out the plan and asking for input. We truly appreciate Edina's responsiveness and concern for residents' opinions. Sincerely, Judy Plant MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 19, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The agenda was amended by Chair Nelson to move the Streetcar presentation up after Approval of Minutes. Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Bass approving the amended agenda. All voted ave. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 21, 2012 Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to approve the June 21 minutes. All voted ave. Motion carried. SPECIAL MEETING OF JULY 9, 2012 Edits were made as follow: Page 1, 3rd paragraph, 1St sentence "...said something closer to option 3 was assumed in the cost of the funding application..." Page 1, last paragraph, delete "a group" and replace with "FHWA International Program." Page 3, 7th paragraph, 0 sentence add ':..and she believes there should be formal collaboration between the 7 T and the Planning Commission." Motion was made by member Janovv and seconded by member Bass to approve the July 9 minutes as edited. All voted ave. Motion carried. STREET CAR PRESENTATION Andy Brown, 5512 Park Place, and a member of the ETC Transportation Options Working Group, presented an idea for a streetcar system for the eastern and southeastern side of Edina. He said the idea is to differentiate Southdale from other retail areas by creating a system to support the transportation infrastructure in an area that is becoming more urban. He said it is based on the streetcar system in Portland, Oregon. His presentation included potential routes, benefits to the community, links to Greater Rail & Transportation Infrastructure, infrastructure investments and goals, Portland's costs and benefits, and links to learn more about federal funds. During discussion, Mr. Brown explained that the street car would travel on the street and follows the same traffic laws as motor vehicles; it travels mid - traffic at street level with no need to step up or down; right -of -way not needed like for light rail; capacity is same size as buses; one stop parking option stands to help emphasize Southdale as a go to place; and this mode of operation is more friendly travel for seniors. Mr. Brown was asked if the population would justify the investment and he said it could, based on the level of development in the Southdale area. He was asked about operating hours and he said it would run all hours, except overnight. Mr. Brown said he shared the idea with Mr. Robb Gruman, administrator for Fairview Southdale Hospital and chair of the Edina Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Gruman, who was in attendance, said he is organizing a group to look at the merit for the long term. Member Braden said linking to the Greater Rail would require this to be part of the regional plan. Mr. Brown said he has focused more on fact finding so far and that there will be a need for economic and non - economic support from local businesses before seeking regional support. The consensus was that the Transportations Option Working Group would ontinue this discussion. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORT /RECOMMENDATIONS Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of July 11, 2012 Director Houle withdrew the speed table from the agenda until the next meeting because it was not included in the ETC's packet. Section A.2 Member Janovy said she was the one that contacted the planner; therefore, for clarification it should probably be reworded to say a member of the ETC. She said she is assuming parking will only be allowed where allowed and restricted to hours allowed. Director Houle Wayne said it is based on the parking rule of no overnight parking from Nov 1St to April 15 and 6 hour limit. Member Janovy asked if this could be included since the Construction Management Plan (CMP) is a standalone document and contractors may not look up the parking code. Additionally, she said she is concerned with the width (12 feet) and wondered if was sufficient in all cases. Director Houle said he would have to take her concerns back to the group that developed the CMP; however, he said the wider the street, the further back cars are pushed into the neighborhood. Motion was made by Member Janovy and seconded by member Iver with the acknowledgement that the speed table will be brought back and that the Construction Management Plan will come back at a later meeting for review. All voted ave. Motion carried. France Avenue Pedestrian and Bike Crossings Feasibility Study Director Houle said a revised option 3 would be presented and that the City Council would like to discuss the original re- scoping prior to the August 6 public hearing. He said the ETC would be informed when the meeting date is set. Mr. Chuck Rickart, project manager, presented. Mr. Rickart explained that the 2007 federal grant was for a pedestrian overpass bridge and the re -scope change is where they are now which is for intersection enhancements at 76th, 70th and 66th. He said the scope changed approved by the Met Council included median refuge islands with landscaping at intersections; intersection improvements (narrowing of existing lanes at intersections; removing free right turn islands; enhanced corner treatments; ADA compliant; and pedestrian level lighting); signal improvements (APS signals, countdown timers and vehicle and bike detection); east /west bike accommodations; provide better accessibility to Transit; and minimal right -of -way (ROW) acquisition only at intersections. Mr. Rickart said the presentation to the Met Council was a preliminary concept plan and he estimated the cost to be $2,045,000 based on aerial mapping only; a "typical" intersection design; minimal landscaping in center median and adjacent to intersections; minimal pedestrian level lighting; and no ROW acquisition was assumed. Mr. Rickart said after the special meeting with the ETC on July 9, the preliminary concept plan (scope change) was designed to include staying in the ROW as best they could (except for the intersections); sidewalk all the way; widened intersection for landscaping; and medians staying the same. He said the estimated cost for this design was $2,302,400, including some ROW costs. Continuing, Mr. Rickart said on May 1, the City Council expressed a desire for an urban design for the corridor - more than just landscaping, and LBH was hired. He said they looked at the entire corridor to ensure that whatever is done at the three intersections could be done at the others. Additionally, two stakeholders meeting were held to gather feedback, plus a special meeting with the ETC. He said at the first meeting the feedback was that the space between the road and sidewalk was important. He said they designed three options (1. Separated bike /pedestrian with boulevard; 2. Separated bike /pedestrian with no boulevards; and 3. On-road bike lane with sidewalks), plus leaving the original scope change as an option also. The options were presented at the second stakeholders' meeting and the consensus was to move forward with option 1; however, at that time costs and ROW impacts were not known. 2 At the special meeting with the ETC on July 9, Mr. Rickart said the consensus was that the estimated cost of $9,145,500 was too high and the recommendation was to go with a revised option 3 (no bike lanes on France Ave; east /west bike lanes consistent with Bike Plan; and provide sidewalk connections on France Ave with boulevards). Mr. Rickart turned over the presentation to Mr. Craig Churchward of LBH to explain the urban design feature. Mr. Churchward said the idea was premised on other planning documents relating to the community as a whole, and unique features of France Ave with the potential of becoming a main street for the community and as such create a sense of identity for the whole community. Mr. Churchward said if a full build out cannot be done, they could look at ways to create an incremental development as the road changes character— less cars, more pedestrians. He said this could be accomplished using visible vertical elements - large trees outside and inside medians; monuments to create sense of place; flowers that would be vibrant /noticeable; and pedestrian lighting. He said creating something unique or a level of detail says you care. He also said to create a motif that can be used over and over as properties are redeveloped along France Ave. In conclusion, Mr. Rickart said the estimated cost for revised option 3 is $5,799,100 and that it is the urban design and ROW that has significantly increased the cost over the scope change estimated cost of $2,045,000. He said to meet the mandatory sunset date of March 31, 2013, the following schedule must be adhere to: project development — Apr to Dec 2012; project memorandum —Oct 2012; ROW acquisitions — Sept 2012 to Mar 2013; detail design — Aug 2012 to Mar 2013; final approval (City /County /MnDOT) — Mar 31, 2013; and begin construction Summer 2013. Discussion Member Franzen said there is an extra 2 feet of excess ROW and asked if it could be narrowed up. Mr. Rickart said if they use a 'pathway' classification it would be needed and they have not gotten MnDOT's approval yet. Chair Nelson asked about narrowing of existing lane at intersections and if the entire corridor would be this way. Director Houle said the north bound lanes would be reduced while the south bound side would be reduced only at the intersections. Member Janovy asked if they would be ripping out sidewalks to put in new ones and if the new sidewalks would link up to existing sidewalks. Mr. Rickart said they will not be ripping out any sidewalk and that they would be matching up to existing sidewalks with the exception of 66tH Member Janovy said it looks like bike lanes are being added where there is a right turn lane, and it was not clear that they continue on the other side of the street in all cases. Mr. Rickart said it depends on the intersection; 70th for example will end at the intersection and bikers can get across on the sidewalk to the existing bike lane; other intersections will end. Member Janovy said this design does not match what ordinance allows (no biking on sidewalk). She also said that statements are made on page 29 of the report without details and these will need to be clarified for City Council. Member LaForce asked if sidewalk on the eastside is multi -use and Mr. Rickart said yes. He also asked if the plan is to remove the trees at Macy's in order to place the sidewalk and Mr. Rickart said they have not worked out the fine details yet but as it looks now, the trees would be removed. Member Braden asked about transit shelter locations and Mr. Rickart said Metro Transit is not proposing any changes at this time. He said they talked about moving one stop around to Hazelton and off France. Member Whited asked about monument cost and Mr. Churchward said $75,000 is included for six each monuments. She also asked about irrigation cost and Mr. Churchward said it is included. Chair Nelson said he likes the idea of the sidewalk at Byerly's and Macy's but wondered about the additional ROW cost since the ROW has increased cost so much. Mr. Rickart said he did not have this specific ROW cost available but could forward it at a later time. Director Houle said he has shown the plans to Byerly's and they like the design so there is a possibility that the City may be able to get the ROW without cost or minimal cost; however, the City has to be cognizant of their parking requirements. He said there is also the option of putting the sidewalk below and then moving it up when the site is redeveloped in the future. Member Janovy asked about the grade of the sidewalk and Mr. Rickart said it would be ADA compliant. Member Janovy asked about the following elements and Mr. Rickart responded accordingly: crosswalks width is 8 feet; all free rights are being removed; they will be working with the County on a bike detection system; for crossings, the County prefers a design that allows pedestrians to cross all the way majority of the time without the need for a push button in the middle of the intersection but the City will seek approval for a push button; a speed study should not add extra cost; Director Houle said the state looks at the. 85% percentile speed that vehicles are currently traveling to set the speed limit. Member Janovy suggested option 3 without the boulevard and a sidewalk along the curb. Mr. Rickart said the cost would be $23M. She asked what kind of sidewalk can they have without additional ROW and Mr. Plowman said it would be 6 -7 feet against the curb. Mr. Churchward added that it would not be 6 -7 feet of usable space — there would be shy distance and it's not developing the idea that was talked about with the public and the ETC of generating a living street for the community. Member Janovy agreed but said that $6M is more than what she believes would be approved so there is a need to strike a balance to get closer to the budget and make it safe for pedestrians. Mr. Churchward said the three intersections need to be a statement for the rest of the corridor. He recommended a design that will be functionally correct and to reduce cost, eliminate the trees and monuments because they can be added later. Member Braden asked if they've explored other funding options because she would hate to lose the boulevard. Director Houle said they've talked about special assessment and the City Council will be discussing this project at a workshop before the Aug 6 public hearing. Chair Nelson said he likes the idea of option 3 because it sets up the intersections for future expansion, and is considering moving it forward with potential cost savings. He said the workshop session is the place to allow the City Council to express their interest and cut and paste. He said the $5.8M is significantly more than the $2M that they started with but it is the right size for the corridor. Member LaForce agreed and suggested for the workshop that they come prepared with cost estimate without the monuments, not doing extra radius adjustments, but he is not so sure about removing the trees. Mr. Rickart said they will have detail costs for the meeting and member lyer requested receiving the estimated costs before the meeting. Member Janovy said she wants the boulevard and for the project to be as beautiful as it can be but they should also consider 69th and not strand pedestrians. She said the monuments seem like an easy thing to cut but is under the impression based on a couple conversations, that even with special assessments, that this project is too costly. She said they need to be able to show that it can be done for less. She asked if the City Council will be asked to approve the feasibility study on August 6 and Director Houle said yes; however, they can continue until the next meeting if they so choose. Member lyer said he would like to focus on where to reduce cost and see what they can get for $3M or $4M. Member Bass said she likes the idea of looking at something less costly. She said they did not see a feasibility study for the overpass and suspect that they would be in this same spot. She said the value and utility of the project as it is now conceived will be of much greater use to residents and the cost per user will be a lot lower than the original project. Member Braden said she has not heard about the value that this will be to commercial properties and how they might be able to contribute in say ROW dedication. Chair Nelson agreed that the bridge would be around the same cost. He believes there is a way to do the project but the workshop is the place to work things out. Motion was made by member Franzen to approve option 3 based on the discussion and to look at ways to reduce ROW cost; have landowners share in contribution of ROW; construction cost reduction such as free rights, etc. and forward to Council. Member lyer asked for an amendment to not mention option 3 because the concepts along the corridor are what they want. Motion not seconded. Member Thompson suggested approving the scope change revise and then see show what they can get for $3M and $4M in meeting the Living Streets and urban design principles. Member Janovy said she can support this and add on up 4 to a point that the City Council is comfortable with. Member LaForce said he does not know what the City Council is comfortable with. He said the City Council saw the original project and they added the urban design. He said further that maybe they are interested in everything and suggested pushing it forward to them to see what their cost threshold is. Motion made by member Franzen and seconded by member LaForce to move forward with option 3, provided that all of the additions to the revised scope change be clearly delineated so that they can have a discussion at the City Council workshop regarding what should be added or not added, including finance options. Aye: Franzen, Braden, LaForce, Whited, Nelson, Bass, Thompson, lyer Nay: Janovy Motion carried. Updates Student Member - No update. Bike Edina Task Force — Minutes of June 14, 2012 Member Janovy said she emailed a revised bike ordinance memo to everyone. She said the BETF approved a recommendation to change the biking on sidewalk ordinance. She suggested bringing it to the ETC for discussion. The consensus was to discuss at the next meeting. She also sent an email with a link to Bike Walk Twin Cities on lessons learned. Living Streets Working Group Draft Policy Presentation Member Thompson, chair of the Living Streets Working Group, said BARR and HR Green would present an update. Mr. Fred Rozumalski, Barr Engineering, explained what Living Streets is. He said it is gray and green infrastructure with gray being what is traditional seen as roads (cars oriented) and green are storm water capture and reuse, trees, pedestrian safety, bikes, etc. He said green is not often addressed in street projects and Living Streets tries to balance the two. He noted the components that would be included in Living Streets but also noted that each street would be designed independently. Mr. Rozumalski also discussed Common Living Streets Principles; Development Framework; Peer Review & Lessons Learned; Existing Plans and Policies; Vision and Goals. Mr. Dan Edgerton, Barr Engineering, presented the Next Steps which included Developing a Living Streets Plan; Public Engagement; Comprehensive Inventory and Prioritization; Implementation Process Framework; and Design Template Examples. Member Thompson said the ETC could provide feedback to him via email on the vision and draft policy. Transportation Options Working Group Member Whited said they created a checklist for reviewing transportation items and reviewed her program, Prism Express. Next meeting they will review the BE Line and Veaps Volunteer Drivers Program. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS— None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS 2013 Work Plan Director Houle said the City Council reviewed their work plan last Tuesday which included lots of projects that the ETC is involved with. He said now is the time to give input and suggested that at the August meeting the ETC identify priorities for submission to the City Council. Members can email their priorities to chair Nelson or Director Houle. Member Bass said Hennepin County is developing a pedestrian plan and they reached out to her and the Do.Town organizers to help them reach out to the communities. Member Whited asked if the residents who are concerned about the intersection at Chowen would be able to address the ETC at the August meeting and Chair Nelson said they can during the Community Comment period. STAFF COMMENTS Director Houle said July 24 is bid opening for the Bike Boulevard and the bump outs for Wooddale — the estimate is high for the bump outs. On Aug 7, the public works department will begin the bike striping project a that was approved by the ETC (70th, Antrim, Cahill). ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION JULY 24, 2012 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Chair Kingston, Commissioners Bigbee, Newell, Seidman, Stanton and Winnick. Staff present: Lisa Schaefer, Human Resources Director and Staff Liaison; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; and Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee and seconded by Commissioner Seidman approving the meeting agenda of July 24, 2012. Ayes: Bigbee, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick. Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Motion was made by Commissioner Stanton and seconded by Commissioner Seidman to approve the June 26, 2012 minutes with the following changes: IV.A. Turning Val Burke's recommendation into action, Commissioner�Stanton and Newell met with Greg Hanks, Director of the Southdale YMCA, to see how they are tapping into the community and what is working well. IV. B. Delete "This event was pulled off the Commission 2012 Work Plan" and replace with "Prior to leaving the meeting, Chair Kingston announced the subcommittee decided to cancel this event and pulled it off the Commission 2012 Work Plan. IV. C. Delete "No correspondence or petitions were received." and replace with "Prior to leaving the meeting, Chair Kingston stated (i) HRRC was all copied on an email from Laird Beaver and she would respond to him; (ii) She had sent out resolutions from other cities for the subcommittee to review ". Ayes: Bigbee, Kingston, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick Motion carried. V COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no community comments. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VIA. Boards and Commissions Survey Results Assistant City Manager Karen Kurt presented the results of the Boards and Commissions Survey. 1 o Staff Liaison Schaefer noted she will send out an electronic copy of the survey that will be easier to read. Assistant City Manager Kurt noted: • Joel Stegner volunteered as the survey coordinator and helped the City evaluate the Boards and Commissions survey staff conducted earlier this year. • Strong response rate from the HRRC and all Boards and Commissions. The average tenure of an HRRC member was 2.6 years, about average for all Boards and Commissions. Depicts a trend of relatively new members serving their first term on a Board or Commission. • There were some clear areas where improvement was needed across all boards. • The interview and application process- Staff is planning to work on improving this process, hopefully offering testimonials from current members about what it is like to be a member and the type of work the Board and Commission does. Staff also hopes to make short videos people can watch to learn about the Boards and Commissions. • Chair Kingston suggested putting together standard job descriptions and explanations of what is expected of a member of that board. • Assistant City Manager Kurt responded that is a possibility as part of the application, so people are aware from the very beginning what they are applying to be part of. • Orientation process • Commissioner Seidman asked when the new members joined the Boards and Commissions and if the City was currently looking for new members? • Assistant City Manager Kurt replied in January we will begin accepting new applications. Right now the council just finished looking at Student Applications. • Training- Staff will be working on this area, particularly training for chairs. • The HRRC was fairly average in activities but there were several notably lower areas: • Topics discussed; • Effective use of time; • Public Participation; • Communication of results. • In regards to time members spend outside of the meeting working on HRRC materials, the HRRC is a little higher than average. The survey asked a follow up question about how people felt about the time commitment; overall the comments were positive from HRRC members about the time being appropriate. • Commissioner Seidman asked if the Boards are lower, what the Council/Staff plans to do to raise the results. • Assistant City Manager Kurt stated the City is focusing on common overall areas of concern across all boards, some of the individual board or commission items the group will need to focus on. This could be done by group conversations about the areas that are lower and internally working to improve /resolve those items. ■ All comments associated with the responses are in the back of the power point. • Work plan: • The HRRC was ahead when it came to the development and use of a Board and Commission work plan. • The Council, Staff and Boards and Commissions all agreed work plans would be valuable. The first draft of the formalized work plan for all of the Boards and 2 Commissions is due in September and will be communicated on at the September 19th, work session with the council. • Council providing direction to Boards and Commissions: o The development of work plans and the joint work session between the Council and Boards and Commission Chairs on September 19°i will be an opportunity for direction to be given by the Council to Boards and Commissions. • Recommend serving on a Board or Commission to others: o HRRC members felt they would recommend service to others. • Recommendations Slide was put together by Joel Stegner, the volunteer coordinator and the recommendations are based off his analysis. o Opportunity for cross - pollination between different boards and commissions, will hopefully be discussed and worked on by having all of the Chairs present at the September 19th meeting sharing their work plans. • The last slide is what the City has done to improve the process already. • Commissioner Newell suggested a more interactive training process. • Commissioner Winnick asked about the new website and about the content for the HRRC page being new? • Assistant City Manager Kurt responded the content has only been migrated for now, Staff does plan on updating the information though. • Commissioner Seidman asked about Student interviews. • Assistant City Manager Kurt stated the Council just wrapped up the interview process. Commissioner Erhardt arrived at 7:20 PM. VI.B. 2012 WORK PLAN UPDATE i. Draft of Domestic Partnership Ordinance Revisions Commissioner Cashmore is working on a draft of the Domestic Partnership Ordinance, but was unable to attend the July meeting; the board should receive the draft at the August meeting. ii. Draft of Editorial Regarding the Impact of Marriage Amendment on Edina Commissioner Stanton presented a draft for consideration by the HRRC. Suggestions: • Listing Edina Businesses who have come out against the marriage amendment. • Listing Edina/local churches that have come out against the marriage amendment. • Looking at Outfront Minnesota to see what companies offer domestic partner benefits in Edina as a means to help identify those who have come out against the marriage amendment. • Specific businesses to investigate: United Healthcare, Cargill and Best Buy. • Looking at which Universities have come out against the amendment: • University of Minnesota • Minnesota State Colleges • Private schools • Suggested political leaders, like Arnie Carlson. Winnick stated some of the reason the opposition hasn't been very loud is because a lot of the "yes" people are working quietly behind closed doors. It might be good to use some of these really well written quotations. • Concern for the length of the editorial. • Referencing some of the big names might draw people in. • Chair Kingston complemented the use of the City Code, stating using the code really exemplifies this is not just words, Edina stands for this. • Changing the word tolerance to inclusiveness and moving the section to the top, because of its Edina focused rhetoric. • Still want editorial to end on a powerful statement. Suggestion to move the economic competiveness.to the end and put a focus on Edina Companies in the economic competiveness section could provide the Edina focus at the end as well. • Commissioner Newell suggested possibly cutting of the section on Constitutional Inflexibility, because it is a focus on structure and how we govern ourselves rather than the immediate decision. Commissioner Winnick stated at first he had the same impression, but after re- reading the section he believes it would be a good reminder and could inform those who are not aware of the permanent nature of an amendment versus a statute. Chair Kingston commented she likes the section being included because it talks about what it really means to change the constitution. Commissioner Kingston suggested leaving the Constitutional inflexibility unless the editorial needed to be cut. • Commissioner Stanton brought back up the section on adding political leaders to clarify. Commissioner Seidman suggested it would be good to have supporters on both political parties. • Investigating if any athletes or sports figures had come out against the amendment. Motion was made by Commissioner Winnick and seconded by Commissioner Seidman to have Commissioner Stanton revise the draft with the direction given and work with Communications and Technology Director Jennifer Bennerotte to format the editorial. Ayes: Unanimous- Bigbee, Newell, Stanton, Seidman, Kingston, Winnick, Erhardt Motion carried. iii. Draft Resolution Related to Super PACs Commissioner Kingston introduced a draft resolution on Super PACs titled supporting a United States Constitutional Amendment to Regulate Corporate Political Spending and Campaign Financing, on behalf of Commissioner Finsness who was unable to attend the meeting. • Correct mistake in the fifth whereas, the word Minneapolis needs to be replaced with Edina. • Commissioner Stanton commented he believes the Supreme Court's ruling was a bad decision, but is straining to relate the issue to human rights. • Commissioner Winnick stated we deal in human issues this could be a start of a slippery slope. Where does the human rights line fall? Commissioner Newell responded she does not think the issue is a stretch, the decision dilutes human value and warps the system. 4 • Need to identify Edina Connection and tie decision directly to its impact on Edina. Are there corporations influencing Edina? Possible political contributions in Edina's legislative races? For instance, In Edina we want fair elections without corporations influencing Edina voters. • Commissioner Bigbee stated you cannot see the contributions, because it is anonymous. Think of big companies influencing Minnesota Mines or buying property in Edina. • Suggestion to insert "including the ability to impact elections and government activities within the City of Edina" to the eighth whereas section. • Concerns over the timing of the release. The board just presented an editorial that talks against using constitutional amendments and now is suggesting one by resolution. • Commissioner Stanton points out for this issue a constitutional amendment is the only method available. • Commissioner Newell asks what the urgency was. Chair Kingston explains there is a resident actively pursuing this issue. • Commissioner Seidman points out by the time bring back this resolution with the changes in August and then move it to Council the timing will not be as big of a problem. • Commissioner Winnick suggests tabling the issue until Commissioner Finsness is present to answer questions. • Commissioner Stanton brings up the voter ID amendment having more urgent implications than the Super PAC resolution. • Commissioner Erhardt told the group the State Courts will not have a decision until August, which does not leave us a lot of time if they decide to uphold the amendment. Saint Louis Park has already passed a resolution. Commissioner Erhardt also presented some numbers of disenfranchised voters from the Secretary of States office. • Commissioner Bigbee questioned if a resolution is the best method of handling this? Is another method better for getting notice? • Chair Kingston commented some of the other resolutions have had activity of the facebook page, Politics in Edina. The resolutions have created some discussions in various forums, and gotten some other cities to follow suite passing similar resolutions. • Commissioner Stanton pointed out this issue is more difficult than the marriage amendment in Edina. A lot of people believe voter fraud is a big problem, despite there being no known case of voter fraud related to voter ID. o Chair Kingston suggested bringing the issue back to Edina Residents, talking to the City Clerk. Numbers should be found on how many disenfranchised voters in Edina will be affected, for instance new, students, elderly, moved, recently married, etc. The focus should be on what really will happen if the amendment is passed. The City has not seen any voter fraud, but X% of residents will not be able to register each year. Seniors living in new facilities who haven't gotten new ID's, we will be taking away their rights to vote. • Commissioner Newell will work with the City Clerk and Communications and Technology Director Jennifer Bennerotte on a Q &A article about the subject to get Edina focused information, Commissioner Bigbee will assist in editing the article. • Commissioner Stanton and Commissioner Erhardt will form a sub - committee to draft a resolution for August. • Commissioner Erhardt suggests including the costs of the voter ID in the article. • Chair Kingston points out a lot of people are unaware the amendment will take away same day registration for everyone, even if you do have proper identification. If there was a problem at the DMV there will be no way to fix the situation in time for the person to vote. • Commissioner Erhardt points out many seniors who do not drive will not have a means to validate themselves as residents. • Chair Kingston states next month we will come back to this issue with the drafted resolution and Q &A information and we will decide what we want to do. iv. General Updates on Work Plan Work Teams gave updates according to the 2012 HRRC Work Plan Monitor Domestic Partner Ordinance (Cashmore & Winnick) • Chair Kingston states Commissioner Cashmore will bring this information to the August meeting. ii. Initiate Census Research Funding Recommendation (Stanton & Newell) • No update for this month. iii. Anti - bullying Event and Education (Finsness & Bigbee) • Chair Kingston states book suggestions were due to Commissioner Finsness. • Commissioner Bigbee explains his understanding is the book group will be selecting the books, we were just making suggestions. The target date for the event is early 2013. The current focus for anti- bullying is primarily on Edina Reads for now. • No update. V. Diversity Awareness Event (Cashmore & Kingston) • Chair Kingston said that at the June meeting an explanation was requested for why the event was dropped from the plan. At the May meeting there was a lot of disagreement about this event and it did not seem worth pursuing. The subcommittee would focus on other issues. vi. Tom Oye Award Criteria (Finsness & Winnick) • Commissioner Winnick states this has been put off until the August meeting at Commissioner Finsness' request. vii. Supreme Court Decision on Super PACs (Finsness) • Notes to be sent to Commissioner Finsness and edited resolution should be presented in August. T VI. C. 2013 WORK PLAN Staff Liaison Schaefer explained the 2013 draft work plan needs to be completed and submitted to Assistant Manager Kurt by September 7, 2012. The HRRC will need to discuss strategies for the 2013 work plan to prepare for approval by the HRRC at the August meeting. The Chairs present at the September 19th work session but the work plans won't be approved by the Council until around January. • Tom Oye Award: Commisioner Winnick suggested considering moving the Tom Oye award off of an annual award to a more occasional award as qualified candidates are presented. o Chair Kingston stated we still want to keep the award, either way on our radar as an annual duty. If we are going to change the award to a non - annual event, we need to know by our August or September meeting so we can pull it from About Town. • Broader focus: Commissioner Bigbee suggested the work plan could have a focus on the broader human rights in Edina next year when we are not so busy with election items. For instance, transportation needs. There are no sidewalks on France leading to that bus stop. The City has been working on this, but items like this that we see could be a good venue to bring them up. For instance, housing needs, economic development and public policy influence on the residents of Edina. We could work on setting a direction for the future of human rights in Edina. Look at the Community, evaluate broadly how we are doing with human rights in Edina. One particular area is with the increase in diversity. o Chair Kingston stated Commissioner Stanton and Newell are working with the Y on some of these issues but we could work to get out more in the community to find areas. • Domestic Violence: Commissioner Newell stated she would like to work more with domestic violence victim's support. • Commissioner Bigbee suggested having a session dedicated to what we want to do in the future. • Edina's Wikipedia Commissioner Newell suggested changing the Edina Wikipedia page to mention some of the policy work. • Health Care: Commissioner Newell also suggested getting some informational presentations on the health care act, maybe working with the Community Health Committee or medical providers in the area. • Chair Kingston questioned whether the Community Health Committee is meeting more than four times a year, Staff Liaison Schaefer will check on their meeting status. • Commissioner Erhardt agreed about working on Health Act information, stating there is not a lot of clear unbiased knowledge. • Commissioner Bigbee questioned whether the HRRC is the best group to focus on this issue. o Commissioner Newell stated healthcare is a human right. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS No correspondence or petitions were received. 7 VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS • Chair Kingston shared Edina Magazine is going to publish an article on the conflict free materials resolution. • Chair Kingston reminded the committee to please get all information, action items and handouts in a week before the meeting so Staff can include the information in the packet. IX. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Commissioner Stanton made and Commissioner Seidman seconded a motion to declared the meeting adjourned at 9:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC, July 24, 2012 Ariel Klugman, City Manager Intern Jessica Kingston, HRRC Chair 8 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 25, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Grabiel called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were Commissioners Scherer, Forrest, Potts, Carpenter, and Grabiel Absent from the roll: Fischer, Schroeder, Platteter, Staunton Commissioner Platte ter arrived at 7:10 PM III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Meeting Agenda was approved as submitted. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Potts moved approval of the July 11, 2012 meeting minutes. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Sign Area Variance - Edina Public Schools, 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the Edina Public Schools are requesting a 264 square foot wall sign size variance to allow the existing sign on the back of the Kuhlman Stadium press box located at 5701 Normandale Road. Teague explained that this sign was just recently put up on the press box; the previous sign that was there was 90 square feet in size. Edina Sign Ordinance allows a maximum of 24 square feet. The previous sign was erected without a permit from the City of Edina, therefore, previously existed as a nonconforming use. Rather than replace the 90 square foot sign, the applicant is seeking approval of the larger sign. Page 1 of 4 Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends denial of the requested variance to install a 280 square foot sign on the Kuhlman Stadium press box, based on the following findings: 1. There is no practical difficult in this instance. The request is made simply because of a desire to have a large sign that exceeds the Sign Ordinance by 256 square feet. 2. The applicant could replace the existing non - conforming sign with a 90 square foot sign, which would be three times larger than the Sign Ordinance would allow. 3. The proposed sign does not assist in way finding; when people are looking for the field, they would see the field itself and know they have probably located what they are looking for. A 90 square foot sign, then verifies that they have found the correct field. 4. There are several fields and parks in Edina that could be characterized as the "Home of the Hornets." Should this sign be allowed, others may wish to have a similar or larger sign than what is allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. 5. The proposed sign faces single - family homes to the south. These homes are located 550 feet from the proposed sign. 6. The proposal does not meet the general purpose and intent of the sign ordinance, which is to allow signs that in proportion to the wall and the fagade on which it is proposed. The proposed sign would cover the entire back wall of the press box. Appearing for the Applicant John Sumo, Edina Public Schools Comments /Questions Commissioner Scherer commented that in her opinion the sign in itself is unusual and asked how it was measured. Planner Teague responded that Ordinance dictates that the sign be measured by drawing a single rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the letters, symbols, logo or figure drawn on the building or monument. The subject sign is on the rear elevation of the press box. Commissioner Forrest asked if other signs are proposed at this location. Planner Teague responded that no other signage is proposed. Applicant Presentation Mr. Sumo addressed the Commission and explained that Kuhlman Stadium has no directional signs, adding if one lives in Edina they know where the stadium is; however, if one doesn't the stadium can be difficult to find. Continuing, Suma said Edina has a great reputation; but its buildings are older and this is an attempt to update, "give life to" and instill pride in the community. Page Rickert told the Commission the School District was considering creative ways to "spruce up" the stadium and the proposed signage does that. Rickert explained that the signage material is 3M vinyl adding the signage provides identification and direction while promoting school spirit. Rickert commented that in his opinion a school stadium shouldn't be considered as a business. Further Discussion Chair Grabiel said in his opinion the School District shouldn't have erected the sign without first applying for the variance. Grabiel said the School District knows the City has certain requirements with regard to Page 2 of 4 building, signage, etc. and went ahead and put up the.sign without going through the process. Concluding, Grabiel said he is also the concerned that if allowed other District venues could want similar signs. Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Sumo if the sign is lit. Mr. Sumo responded the -sign is not lighted. Commissioner Potts said in his opinion the sign is a good sign; however, it is unfortunate how it was erected. Continuing, Potts asked staff if the "signage" on the City's water tower was considered a "sign" in the same way as this was considered a "sign ". Continuing, Potts said in his opinion the signage does not adversely affect the neighborhood and the sign is in proportion with the stadium. Potts said he also understands the concern about signage on other District venues and suggested that the District review all signs to ensure another oversight doesn't occur and if signs are erected they go through the proper City channels. Commissioner Carpenter asked the cost of the sign. Mr. Page responded that the cost was roughly $6,000 and was donated. Public Comment None. Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All -voted aye; motion carried. _ -- - Continued Discussion Commissioner Scherer said in this instance she agrees with staff that the subject site is unusual and anique. Scherer also pointed out that it appears City Ordinance does not appropriately address this type of building and /or structure. Concluding Scherer said in her opinion the sign should stay. The residential properties are at a considerable distance; reiterating this site is unusual and unique. Chair Grabiel said he can't support the variance request. Grabiel stated he finds no "practical difficulties'; reiterating he doesn't support granting a variance in this instance. Concluding, Grabiel said he also has difficulty granting a variance "after the fact ". A discussi on, ensued on "practical difficulties" and the intent of the School District in sign placement and timing. The majority of the Commission felt there are practical difficulties and that the School District was`unaware the sign did not meet the Sign Ordinance (requiring a variance) when erected. Practical difficulties were noted to include: th'e'unique need and use, circumstances of the property (location off frontage road /Highway); and tree line. Mr. Sumo also noted that this stadium is different from most high school stadiums in that iris not located on the Edina High School campus which creates difficulty in way- finding and identification of a varsity venue. Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Teague if in, this instance the stadium bleachers (along with the press box) could be considered "the building wall " "or one building. Planner Teague responded that one can certainly "make the case" that it's one structure. Commissioner Carpenter pointed out in light of that ` may be possible a variance wouldn't be required. The sign may meet Ordinance. Page 3 of .4 —Motion Commissioner Forrest moved variance approval based on staff findings with additional findings that the football stadium is not located on the high school campus; the sign supports way - finding and noting that this type of structure is unique. With the further condition that no additional signage is added to the structure. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Forrest, Potts, Platteter, Carpenter. Nays; Grabiel. Motion carried. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Grabiel acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reminded the Commission the next meeting of the Commission is on August 22, 2012 and that the regularly scheduled meeting on September 26th was shifted to September 27th. IX. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Potts moved meeting adjournment at 7:40 PM. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. Jaekle diEooQ-enak�ket Respectfully Submitted Page 4of4