The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011-11-01_COUNCIL MEETINGG C� �� SEAL r4 October 30, 2011 OCT 31.2011 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland and Council Members: We respectfully request that the City of Edina rescind its notice dated October 14, 2011 that purportedly requires us. to remove approximately 30 trees along Valley View Road at our expense. We are very, very concerned about this, since removing the trees would destroy the sight and sound barrier between our home and Valley View Road. It would also open up our side yard, where neighborhood children play, to the dangers of the adjacent roadway. It will impose on us an expense and, we believe, devalue our property. Finally, although "safety" is the reason stated in the notice, according to the city's police department there have been no traffic incidents in this area at least since 2007 and, according to the City Engineer before this Council last summer, no traffic incidents in this area for over 10 years. We would like to: A) highlight three reasons that the notice should be rescinded; B) note that the trees were first planted at the recommendation of the City; and, C) offer two recommendations to improve safety at the intersection such that removing trees is not necessary The notice should be rescinded for the following three reasons: 1. There is no leizal basis for this action demanded in the City's letter Due to our alarm at the notice, we felt we had to retain legal counsel. After a review, they have determined that what the city is attempting to do has no legal basis. The trees are not there in violation of any city code, statute, ordinance, or law. In fact, the notice letter makes no reference to any legal basis for the City's demand to remove the trees at our expense Counsel researched several sections of the City Code and concluded there is no violation. First, City Codel050 addresses Maintenance of Vegetation. Subsection 1050.04 Subdivision 1 Setback states "A restoration area or a planned landscape area must provide the following minimum setbacks: Front Street or Side Street (as measured from the traveled portion of the street) 20 feet... ". However, Subsection 1050.02 Definitions defines Restoration Area as "An area where native grasses and forbs are being or have been intentionally re- established" and defines Planned Landscape Area as "An area where ornamental grasses and groundcovers or native grasses and forbs are planted pursuant to a plan ". The trees in question do not fit these definitions. With respect to this issue we are currently in compliance with the City Code. Second, City Code 1200 addresses Use and Maintenance of Streets, Alleys, Sidewalks, Easements, Parks and other City Owned Property. Subsection 1200.02 Encumbrances or Obstructions states that "Except as provided in Subdivision 2 of this Subsection, no person shall obstruct, encroach upon, encumber, or interfere wholly or partially, with any street, boulevard, alley, sidewalk, easement, park or public ground by placing or installing any of the following:... H. Trees and other plantings which overhang the traveled portion of the streets or sidewalks, provided that no portion of such tree or planting is less than 16 feet above the traveled portion of the street or less than 8 feet above the sidewalk... ". The trees in question do not overhang the traveled portion of Valley View Road nor encroach upon the street; with respect to this issue we are currently in compliance with the City Code. Third, there is only one Section of the City Code that addresses sight lines. City Code 1400 addresses the Clear View Zone. Subsection 1405.02 Obstruction of Clear View Zone states that "No owner of a corner lot shall install, set out, maintain, or permit the installation or maintenance of any sign, hedge, fence, tree, shrub, natural growth, building, structure or other obstruction or any part thereof within the clear view zone except as permitted in Subsection 1405.03 ". The clear view zone is defined in Subsection 1405.01 as the triangular area formed by connecting the following three points: the point of intersection of the curb lines extended of intersecting streets, and a point on each curb line 30 feet from the aforementioned point of intersection. We have retained an independent transportation engineering firm; they have researched this issue and evaluated our comer, and determined that with respect to this issue we are currently in compliance with the City Code. (Interestingly, there was a petition delivered to City Council in September, 2011 that requested the city remove our coniferous hedge. The petition alleged violation of these exact three Sections of the City Code as the reason. However, upon researching these Subsections of the City Code it became apparent that we are in compliance of all of these sections.) Please see the attached October 28, 2011 Sight Line Study from RLK Engineering. We respectfully request that the City consider whether it is fair, on the one hand, to ask a citizen to comply with the City's long ago considered, adopted, and published sight line ordinance, and yet, on the other hand, punish that same citizen for not complying with an unpublished, unconsidered, unadopted and excessive sight line study. It isn't. 2. The majority of the trees were planted there at the City's recommendation. In 1992 the previous owner of our home desired to erect a fence at the edge of the property along Valley View and called the City of Edina planning office for permission. He was informed that fencing regulations would require him to place the fence 30 feet from the road, which would render the yard along Valley View virtually useless. The city planning office suggested that, instead of a fence, he plant a hedge since it could be planted along the road. They suggested the arbor vitae as a good choice because they are fast growing and would rapidly provide privacy, and they suggested he leave some room along the road for snow plow piles in the winter in order to avoid damaging the hedge. He did just as the City of Edina recommended, and the arbor vitae hedge has remained there without eliciting any public comment for the last 19 years. Please see letter dated October 24, 2011 by previous homeowner Tom Bach attached. 3. There is no safety problem to be solved by removing our trees. A memorandum dated September 30, 2011 from WSB & Associates to Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer states in its opening paragraph "We have been requested to review the sight lines at the Valley View Road and Sally Lane intersection. This intersection has been reviewed against current City Codes and has deemed to be consistent with Section 1405 `Clear View Zone'. However, there are safety concerns with sight line at this location that are outside of the City's Clear View Zone requirement." However, nowhere in the City's study of this issue is there any mention of anything but a theoretical safety concern. There is no mention of any accidents, injuries collisions, close calls, or other meaningful indication that there is a realistic safety concern. Their conclusion is that a 293 foot decision sight distance be established along Valley View from the point where a motorist on Sally Lane stops before entering Valley View. Their determination of this distance is based on the MnDOT Road Design Manual (Chapter 2- 5.08.04 Decision Sight Distance), which states that "Decision sight distance is the distance needed for a driver to detect an unexpected or difficult -to- perceive condition, recognize the condition and its potential threat, select an appropriate speed and path, and perform the maneuver safely and efficiently." The distance is calculated by using 10 seconds as a guideline as the amount of time needed for the four actions described above (detection, recognition, selection, maneuver). They calculate that 10 seconds of travel time along Valley View at 20 mph equates to 293 feet. Establishing 293 feet (almost a full football field) of sight distance would require us to remove our approximately 30 trees. It is this conclusion that led to the staff recommendation to City Council that the trees need to be removed (at our expense) and is the apparent basis of the notice we received from the City on October 14, 2011. We ask you to just think about this for a minute. The concept described above includes four actions (detection, recognition, selection, and maneuver). A motorist stopped at the white stop bar on Sally Lane does not need time for all four of these actions. They simply need to determine if another vehicle is coming along Valley View and, if not, enter the roadway. That does not take 10 seconds. I have observed hundreds of vehicles approaching the intersection, taking no more than a few seconds to stop and enter Valley View. For this, even five seconds is plenty of time. Indeed, the MnDOT Road Design Manual indicates that "Use of values more or less than 10 seconds may be judged appropriate as circumstances dictate." Try it for yourself! You simply will not need very much time. Using the WSB calculation methodology, five seconds equates to 146.5 feet and there is currently this distance of clear view down Valley View such that no action needs to be taken with respect to tree removal nor trimming. If there was a sight line problem at this intersection, there presumably would be a history of accidents. However, when our legal counsel researched this with the City of Edina Police Department, they were informed that there have been no recorded accidents at this location since 2007, the earliest date records are easily available according to the department. While we feel that intuitively there is adequate sight line distance at the intersection such that no action against our trees needs to be taken, we felt it worthwhile to seek the judgment of a professional traffic engineering firm (a second opinion from that of WSB & Associates). We contacted a leading firm in this area, SRF Consulting, but they indicated they do not take assignments this small and suggested RLK Incorporated, whom we contacted. RLK Incorporated conducted a Sight Line Study, at our expense (please see their report attached). RLK first notes that the Road Design Manual (relied upon by the City in its notice to us) stipulates that "Use of values more or less than 10 seconds may be judged appropriate as circumstances dictate ", and note that the Highway Capacity Manual defaults to a 6.5 second guideline (we note that using the WSB calculation methodology, this would equate to 191 feet). RLK also went on to review traffic engineering standards and manuals to determine the adequate application of sight line distance standards and guidelines in this situation. The firm concludes "To that end, we would state that it is our professional engineering judgment that the ten - second decision time quoted by WSB in their report to the City of Edina is excessive in this situation. Furthermore, we believe that an unsubstantiated safety concern was used to recommend the removal of the planting/vegetation and trees along this frontage of Valley View Road ". RLK's review also determined that "The MnDOT Road Design Manual states that roadway design speed of 30 mph yields a stopping sight distance of 200 feet ". (Interestingly, this is very close to the 191 feet that using the WSB methodology for 6.5 seconds would yield.) Finally, RLK suggests two actions to improve safety at the intersection without removing any trees. We offer two recommendations to improve safety at the intersection without removing any trees. 1. We trim back two fir trees. The RLK Sight Line Study recommends that "While the 200' stopping sight distance is met, it can be improved by the trimming back of the two large fir trees 50 - 75 feet east of Sally Lane ". We would like to note that these trees are not interfering with the sight line established in the RLK report (nor are they violating the City's own code regarding sight lines), but we would be willing to trim them back on our own in order to improve the sight line further. 'We would also like to note that these two trees are not the two trees that have already been trimmed back next to the Clear View Zone. 2. The City of Edina install a Side Street 90 Degree (W2 -2) sign. The RLK report references the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (the "Mn -UTCD" ), which provides direction on when warning signs can and shall be used. Regarding the placement of warning signs, the manual states that these sighs should 'be ,Placed in relation to the "PIEV' time - that is total time needed 'to perceive and complete a reaction to a sign that is the sum of the times necessary for Perception, Identification, Emotion (decision making), and Volition (execution of decision). This time can vary from several seconds to 6 seconds or more for warning signs requiring high road user judgment. In this case, the MnMUTCD states that a Side Road 90 Degree sign (W2 -2) may be used in advance of an intersection to indicate the presence of an intersection and the possibility of turning or entering traffic. RLK suggests that safety can be improved further by the placement of this sign approximately 175 feet from the intersection (at the property line) for the westbound, approach, and that this is a "more practical (and less invasive) solution to this situation than is the removal of several trees and vegetation in this area ". We appreciate your consideration of the above rationale for rescinding the notice to remove our trees, and request that you consider the two recommended actions that will serve to improve safety without destroying any trees. If the City desires to take any action with respect to this situation, please contact us so that we can discuss it. Respectfully, vl/ , Douglas W. Benner 7025 Sally Lane Edina, MN 55439 952- 829 -5443 Jill D. Berner Attachments: Notice from the City of Edina, Tom Bach Letter, RLK Sight Line Study October 14, 2011 Mr. Douglas and Mrs. Jill Benner 7025 Sally Lane Edina, MN 55439 RE: Vegetation within Right -of. -Way Dear Mr. and Mrs. Benner: City of Edina At the October 4 City Council meeting, the City Council approved staff's recommendation to remove vegetation from the roadway right -of -way that is adjacent to your property. Please see attached drawing which indicates what vegetation needs to be removed. This letter serves as official notice that this vegetation needs to be removed by November 14, per staff's recommendation to the City Council: Staff would suggest that the vegetation be removed within 30 -days of notice from City staff. If the vegetation is not removed within the 30 -days staff will then remove the vegetation and invoice the property owner for the cost. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952- 826 -0443 or at whoule @ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosure C: Scott Neal, City Manager - City of Edina G: \PW\ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \S Streets \Sally Lane Vegetation Issue \2011 1014 WH to 1025 Sally Lane RE Vegitation.doc City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 IS October 24, 2011 RE: Trees planted at 7025 Sally Lane, Edina, MN This is background to the row of trees planted on the Valley View Road side of the lot located at 7025 Sally Lane. My wife and I purchased that property in May, 1991. It was our first home. At the time there were a few straggly bushes growing along Valley View Road. In order to provide some level of privacy from the traffic on Valley View Road, and some Level of protection /safety, I investigated installing a fence along Valley View Road. I called the City of Edina planning office in winter of 1992. A woman in the planning office explained the fencing regulations, which would have required me to place the fence approximately 30' back (as I recall) from the road. This would have rendered the side yard virtually useless to us as the majority of the yard would be on the road side of the fence. The city planner suggested, instead that we plant a row of arbor vitae bushes along the road. She suggested these bushes because they are fast growing (approximately 1' per year) and would rapidly provide privacy. She pointed out that they would be a pleasant "fence line ", and that for setback we could plant them close to the road so we could make use of our side yard (which we did in the form of a volleyball and badminton court area). She said the main consideration for.setback would be to leave enough room for snow plow snow piles so that the snow would not damage the hedge. She also gave me instructions on how to prune and maintain the hedge. She was extremely helpful! As a result of that conversation, my wife and I planted the approximately 20 arbor vitae bushes along ValleyView Road. They have become a beautiful privacy: hedge over the past 20 years! hope this background is useful. Please contact me if.you need additional information. l 44 Tom Bach H (952) 943 -2102 C (612) 578 -5274 it \VV /1 \1 V1�1111iL J Creating extraordinary Communities MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Doug Benner and Ms. Jill Benner FROM: Steve Manhart, P.E., PTOE, PTP smanhart @rlkinc.com Vernon Swing, P.E.' vswing@rlkinc.com DATE: October 28, 2011 RE: Sight Line Study 7025 Sally Lane, Edina, MN 55439 RLK Project No. 2011 -19X -M Per your request, RLK Incorporated has completed our review of a sight line report prepared for the City of Edina regarding the intersection of Valley View Road and Sally Lane. This review prepared by WSB & Associates, has identified potential sight line problems for traffic at the southbound approach to Valley View Road. As a result, the WSB report recommends,the removal of several trees and vegetation along the Valley View Road frontage to this property. In.response, you have requested RLK to verify these findings and recommendations, and if necessary, make alternate recommendations for sight line improvements: At the onset of:our review, we have looked at the existing Section 1405 of the City of Edina City. Code that defines Clear View Zones. According to the Code, the 'Clear View Zone is defined as, "The triangular area formed by connecting the following three points: the point of intersection of the curb lines extended of intersecting streets, and a point on each curb line 30 feet from the aforementioned point of intersection. If there are no curbs, the edge of the traveled portion of the street shall be used instead of the curb line. "' We have identified the Clear View Zones that exists at the intersection of Valley View Road and Sally Road (See Figure 1). Using these parameters, we, conclude that the intersection Clear Zones are adequately .clear of trees and vegetation in keeping with the letter of the ordinance. (Note that the WSB, report has deemed that this intersection was consistent with Section 1405 as well.) Nevertheless, the City has pursued a review of sight lines throughout Edina. In the WSB Memorandum dated 10/30/ 2011, "...there are safety concerns with sight line at this location that are outside of the 1 Section 1405.01 Clear View Zone Defined, City Code, City of Edina, Ord 1402 codified 1970; amended by Ord 1995 -6 8- 17 -95., hgp:// www .ci.edina.mn.us /citycode/L5 -01 CityCodeSectl405.htm Offices: Duluth • Ham Lake • Hibbing • Minnetonka • Oakdale (952) 933 -0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 FAX (952) 933 -1153 Equal Opportunihj Etnploy& City's Clear View Zone requirement." With that, WSB conducted an in -depth analysis of Decision Sight Distance, as defined by the Minnesota Road Design Manual. The WSB study quotes the Mn/DOT manual as defining a decision time of 10 seconds as adequate for most practical purposes. The Road Design Manual states that, "Use of values more than or less than 10 seconds may be judged appropriate as circumstances dictate. ,2 The manual goes on to say, "In cases where providing 10- second decision sight distance is desired but not practical, special geometric, signing and/or delineation measures should be considered to aid drivers' perception and decision making.3 In fact, the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual defaults to 6 -1/2 seconds for driver gap acceptance, significantly less than 10 seconds. The WSB report concludes that a sight line of 293 feet is required for a 20 mph approach vehicle from the east. Thus, it was recommended that "all of the planting in the right -of -way from Sally Lane to the 7146 property be removed, including the trees along the 7025 property." RLK Incorporated has been on -site and has reviewed the traffic and sight distance conditions at the intersection. Field observations indicated that gaps in excess of 6 -1/2 seconds are common. We noted that the stop bar has been located far forward so as to allow maximum sight distance to the east (See Exhibit 1). We noted the line of trees and vegetation that exist along the property south frontage. We have also looked at the sight lines for traffic at Sally Lane attempting to see traffic approaching the intersection. We also have reviewed the additional information that you have provided, as well as traffic engineering standards and manuals to determine the adequate application of sight distance standards and guidelines in this situation. Exhibit 1. Southbound Approach to Valley View Road along Sally Lane 2 Road Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN, July 2007, page 2- 5(17). 3 Ibid. FIX Incorporated Page 2 of 4 October28, 2011 Sight Line Review —7025 Sally Ln., Edina, MN 2011 -19X -M To that end, we would state that it is our professional engineering judgment that the ten - second decision time quoted by WSB in their report to the City of Edina is excessive in this situation. Furthermore, we believe that an unsubstantiated safety concern was used to recommend the removal of the planting /vegetation and trees along this frontage of Valley View Road. Our review of the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual shows that, "Stopping sight distance represents a near worst -case situation. "4 It is our opinion that the onus of safety is on the Valley View driver as well as the driver turning from Sally Lane. While we agree that the.driver from Sally Lane is "deciding" whether to enter the gap in the traffic along Valley View Road, the driver approaching Sally Lane along Valley View must have a sight line sufficient to stop. The Mn/DOT Road Design Manual states that a roadway design speed of 30 mph yields a stopping sight distance of 200 feet (See Figure 2). Therefore, the westbound driver along Valley View Road must have an awareness of the approaching intersection at Sally Lane. This is a situation where signing the presence of a T- intersection may provide drivers with adequate warning without the need to completely remove all plantings and trees along this frontage. To that end, the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) provides direction on when warning signs can and shall be used. Regarding the placement of warning signs the manual states these signs should be placed in relation to the "PIEV" time -- that is, the total time needed to perceive and complete a reaction to a sign is the sum of the times necessary for Perception, Identification (understanding), Emotion (decision making), and Volition (execution of decision).5 The MnMUTCD states that "the PIEV time can vary from several seconds for general warning signs to 6 seconds or more for warning signs requiring high road user judgment ".6 This varies significantly from the 10 seconds quoted by the WSB engineer. In this case, the MnMUTCD states that a Side Road 90 Degree sign (W2 -2) "may be used in advance of an intersection to indicate the presence of an intersection and the possibility of turning or entering traffic ".7 The installation of a W2 -2 sign (see Exhibit 2) approximately 175 feet from the intersection (at the property line) for the westbound approach to this intersection is a more practical (and less evasive) solution to this situation than is the removal of several trees and vegetation in this area. Exhibit 2. MnMUTCD W2 -2 Sign — Side Street 90 Degrees a Road Design Manual, page 2- 5(12). 5 Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN, May 2005, page 2C -3. 6 Ibid. 7 MnMUTCD, page, 2C -20. RLKlncorporated Page 3 of 4 October 28, 2011 Sight Line Review —7025 Sally Ln., Edina, MN 2011 -19X -M J Safety has been cited as a rationale used to support the decision sight distance concern. The NWDOT Road Design Manual states, "It is also beneficial to review the accident history and prepare a collision diagram while redesigning an intersection. Accident history is often the most accurate predictor of future accidents, and an analysis can offer valuable insights into any safety problems that may exist. "8 Therefore, RLK Incorporated investigated intersection crash history. According to statements made by the Edina City Engineer at a public meeting, there have not been any crashes at the intersection of Valley View and Sally in at least ten years.9 If sight distance were truly a safety concern, there would be a high incidence of right -angle crashes at the intersection. It is our contention that, while the identification of potential safety problems is important, the relatively low speed (posted 30 mph) and the single lane approach of westbound traffic does not warrant additional sight line exposure approaching Sally Lane. In conclusion, RLK Incorporated finds that the use of decision sight distance to determine adequate sight lines is excessive and not in keeping with other traffic engineering design principles. The rationale of safety as an aspect in determining adequate traffic control should be founded in crash data as well as sight distance calculations. While decision sight distance would affect the driver turning onto Valley View Road, the awareness of the approaching intersection is equally important for the westbound driver. Situational awareness can be improved for the westbound driver by the installation of a Side Street 90 Degree Sign (W2 -2). As a result, the stopping sight distance for the Valley View driver becomes as important, if not more important than the decision sight distance for the Sally Lane driver. While the 200' stopping sight distance is met, it can be improved by the trimming back of the two large fir trees 50 -75 feet east of Sally Lane. Our recommended actions appear on Figure 3. They remain significantly less severe to the trees and vegetation along Valley View Road, but will provide improved awareness of the Sally Lane intersection. CADocuments and SettingslAdmin\Desktop \Valley View & SallyVAEMORANDUM.doc 'Mn/DOT Road Design Manual, page 5 -1(1). 9 As reported by Doug and Jill Benner, residents of 7025 Sally Lane, Edina, MN. FMIncorporated Page 4 of 4 October 28, 2011 Sght Line Review —7025 Sally Ln., Edina, MN 2011 -19X -M Section 1405 — Char View Zone *Y 1405.01 spear View Zone Defined. The triangular area ed by elooting the following three points: the point ` of of the curb lines extended of Intersecting R a j and a paint on each curb fine 30 feet from the tuned point of Intareection. If there are no ii o ube, the edge of the traveled portion of the street ehaU u, be used instead of the curb gee. r. 1405.02 Obstruction of pear View Zone. No owner of a da comer lot shall InsiaY. set out. maintain, or permit the � *� Installation or maintenance of an sign, hedgeens. s, f tree. shrub, natural grawti building, structure or other obstruction or any part thereof within the dear view zone except aij provklod h Subsection 1405.03. City of. Edina City Code CLEAR ZONE4 ! - • f � + . CLEAR ZO,N� `� ,�.. �.'�, � k �3� 'f�• -x..; . 301' O, 3 t. 0 50 v SCALE IN FEET n¢s eEM W Section 1405 — Clear View Zone k 4C t 1405.01 ;Clear View Zone Defined. The triangular am + �i by connecting the fallowing three points: the point x of hraation of the curb line extended of Intersecting ; 'I : and a point an each emb line 30 feet from the tiorW point of Intersection. If then are no curbe, the edge of the traveled portion of the street shall be used instead of the curb Its.' - � nor 1405.02 Obstruction of pear View Zone. No owner of a4 x comer lot shall ihetd6set out, maintain. or permit the installation aintenmce of any sign. hedge, fence, trvs., shrub, rw�wol gi*wU bul4g, structure or other d, abbhu or my part thereof within the dear view zone"' ezoeptuproAded In Subsection 1405.03. °j Edino ate' Cod' VEHICLE APPROACHING r y WESTBbugb , VEHICLE AT STOP BAR 2p0' STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE Ai.s 9 0 50 _ SCALE IN FEET ®M. Duluth, MN Figure " o. 'MN Valley View Road and Sally Lane 3 RL.K Hihhing, MN Minneonka, MN Oakdale, MN 7p tNCOMIOlUil'L•D Phone: 952 933 0972 Date V Fax: 952 933 1153 PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS 10/27/11 � vww.dkinccom O 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 J Safety has been cited as a rationale used to support the decision sight distance concern. The NWDOT Road Design Manual states, "It is also beneficial to review the accident history and prepare a collision diagram while redesigning an intersection. Accident history is often the most accurate predictor of future accidents, and an analysis can offer valuable insights into any safety problems that may exist. "8 Therefore, RLK Incorporated investigated intersection crash history. According to statements made by the Edina City Engineer at a public meeting, there have not been any crashes at the intersection of Valley View and Sally in at least ten years.9 If sight distance were truly a safety concern, there would be a high incidence of right -angle crashes at the intersection. It is our contention that, while the identification of potential safety problems is important, the relatively low speed (posted 30 mph) and the single lane approach of westbound traffic does not warrant additional sight line exposure approaching Sally Lane. In conclusion, RLK Incorporated finds that the use of decision sight distance to determine adequate sight lines is excessive and not in keeping with other traffic engineering design principles. The rationale of safety as an aspect in determining adequate traffic control should be founded in crash data as well as sight distance calculations. While decision sight distance would affect the driver turning onto Valley View Road, the awareness of the approaching intersection is equally important for the westbound driver. Situational awareness can be improved for the westbound driver by the installation of a Side Street 90 Degree Sign (W2 -2). As a result, the stopping sight distance for the Valley View driver becomes as important, if not more important than the decision sight distance for the Sally Lane driver. While the 200' stopping sight distance is met, it can be improved by the trimming back of the two large fir trees 50 -75 feet east of Sally Lane. Our recommended actions appear on Figure 3. They remain significantly less severe to the trees and vegetation along Valley View Road, but will provide improved awareness of the Sally Lane intersection. CADocuments and SettingslAdmin\Desktop \Valley View & SallyVAEMORANDUM.doc 'Mn/DOT Road Design Manual, page 5 -1(1). 9 As reported by Doug and Jill Benner, residents of 7025 Sally Lane, Edina, MN. FMIncorporated Page 4 of 4 October 28, 2011 Sght Line Review —7025 Sally Ln., Edina, MN 2011 -19X -M Section 1405 — Char View Zone *Y 1405.01 spear View Zone Defined. The triangular area ed by elooting the following three points: the point ` of of the curb lines extended of Intersecting R a j and a paint on each curb fine 30 feet from the tuned point of Intareection. If there are no ii o ube, the edge of the traveled portion of the street ehaU u, be used instead of the curb gee. r. 1405.02 Obstruction of pear View Zone. No owner of a da comer lot shall InsiaY. set out. maintain, or permit the � *� Installation or maintenance of an sign, hedgeens. s, f tree. shrub, natural grawti building, structure or other obstruction or any part thereof within the dear view zone except aij provklod h Subsection 1405.03. City of. Edina City Code CLEAR ZONE4 ! - • f � + . CLEAR ZO,N� `� ,�.. �.'�, � k �3� 'f�• -x..; . 301' O, 3 t. 0 50 v SCALE IN FEET n¢s eEM W Section 1405 — Clear View Zone k 4C t 1405.01 ;Clear View Zone Defined. The triangular am + �i by connecting the fallowing three points: the point x of hraation of the curb line extended of Intersecting ; 'I : and a point an each emb line 30 feet from the tiorW point of Intersection. If then are no curbe, the edge of the traveled portion of the street shall be used instead of the curb Its.' - � nor 1405.02 Obstruction of pear View Zone. No owner of a4 x comer lot shall ihetd6set out, maintain. or permit the installation aintenmce of any sign. hedge, fence, trvs., shrub, rw�wol gi*wU bul4g, structure or other d, abbhu or my part thereof within the dear view zone"' ezoeptuproAded In Subsection 1405.03. °j Edino ate' Cod' VEHICLE APPROACHING r y WESTBbugb , VEHICLE AT STOP BAR 2p0' STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE Ai.s 9 0 50 _ SCALE IN FEET ®M. Duluth, MN Figure " o. 'MN Valley View Road and Sally Lane 3 RL.K Hihhing, MN Minneonka, MN Oakdale, MN 7p tNCOMIOlUil'L•D Phone: 952 933 0972 Date V Fax: 952 933 1153 PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS 10/27/11 � vww.dkinccom O 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 AGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY ROOM NOVEMBER 1, 2011 5:00 P.M. I. Call To Order II. Request For Funding Edina Public Art Committee III. Request for Funding Edina Historical Society L IV. Review 2012 -2016 Capital Improvement Plan V. Review Draft Utility Rate Study VI. Review Draft 2012 HRA Operating Budget VII. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Nov 1 Draft 2012 Budget and Capital Improvement Plan Review 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Draft Utility Rate Study Tues Nov 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 8 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Fri Nov 11 VETERAN'S DAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Mon Nov 14 Retirement Party — Ceil Smith 3:00 -5:00 P.M. CITY HALL FOYER Tues Nov 15 Draft 2012 Budget Review 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Nov 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 24 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 25 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Dec 6 Work Session — Economic Development Proposal & 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM - 50`h & France Business Area Improvements Tues Dec 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 20 Work Session — Recodification 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Dec 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Dec 26 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed 2012 n Jan 2 NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed' Jan 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS ivion Jan 16 REV. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jan 17 'Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Feb 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Feb 20 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Tues Feb 20 Regular Meeting 1 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS www.EdinaPublicArt.org Lois Ring, Committee Chair, 952 - 806 -9966 Bernice Amacher Patricia Beaver Naomi Griffith Chip Jones Amy Kerber Barbara La ValleUr Mark Lidke Bill McCabe Ruth Valgemae i 'U Diana Hedges and Anne Spooner, Staff, Edina Art Center EdinaArtCenter.com 4701 West 64 "' St. Edina MN 55435 952 - 903 -5780 ArtCenter @ci.Edina.mn.us w�i��r1r 0 Work Session Item II. September, 2011 Honorable Mayor Hovland and members of the Edina City Council: I am writing on behalf of the Edina Public Art Committee to request funding for the public art exhibitions on the Promenade and Grandview Square for the coming season 2012-2013. Our request is for $10,000 to support the cost of future sculpture exhibitions on the Edina Promenade and at Grandview Square Park. These expenditures include a $500 fee to each of up to 12 artists selected for exhibition and $2,250 for 15t 2"d and 3`d place "People's Choice" awards. These awards are selected from the viewing public's votes on ballots at the sculpture sites. The EPAC was formed in 2004 as a standing committee of the Edina Art Center Board to support the acquisition and exhibition of art in public places in the City of Edina. Two early projects were the design competition, selection and installation of the Art Glass window and installation of the Art Dickey Photography exhibition, both in City Hall. The Pinecone installation at Centennial Lakes Park followed in 2008. The outdoor exhibition of sculpture began at Grandview Square in 2006. The opening of the Edina Promenade in 2009 presented an opportunity for installation of nine additional sculptures along the walking and biking paths. The City has installed pads and one pedestal for displaying this art. The City supported the Art Glass window installation and initial EPAC operations with a $25,000 appropriation in 2005. An additional $10,000 was provided in 2007 and 2008 for the inaugural Edina Promenade exhibition. The City continues to amortize the Art Glass window balance (currently $11,800) with funds from utility bill donations. At the current rate of donations, this balance will be eliminated in about four years. At that time, the utility bill donations will be available to support the operations of the EPAC. Since 2004, private donations totaling over $100,000, both directly and through the Edina Community Foundation, have supported the Art Glass window installation, purchases of the Raven sculpture at City Hall, the Otter at Edinborough Park, the Pinecone at Centennial Lakes Park, and the Turtle and Time Piece sculptures on the Promenade. This year, the artist Kevin Komadina donated the Three Trees sculpture. Private support also assisted in the funding of the 2010 Promenade and Grandview Square sculpture exhibitions. We recognize the continuing importance of private support for EPAC programs. The Edina Community Foundation holds small balances that will support future exhibitions and will continue as our partner in raising funds for EPAC activities. Members of the committee are also giving EPAC's "Support Edina Public Art" buttons to donors of $5 or more. The buttons have the image of the Centennial Lakes Pinecone sculpture and are primarily used to raise awareness of the Committee and its work. New projects this year included' • Opening Exhibition Celebration and Reception hosted by Pinstripes. • Meet the Artists at Grandview Square event hosted by Sondra Smalley and our committee. • Design and distribution of a Map Card locating the sculptures on the Promenade walkways with a QR code for referencing our website and the sculpture details. • Co- sponsorship of the Mosaics on the York Avenue Bridges with the Edina Art Center and Bike Edina Task Force. • Assisting the Veterans Memorial Committee in the Call for Artists and selection of an artist for the design of a sculpture for the memorial in Utley Park. We appreciate your consideration of our request and will make ourselves available to answer questions as your budget review continues. Our committee members are passionate about our work and are dedicated to the promotion of public art in Edina and the enjoyment of our beautiful parks. In addition, several of our members have professional backgrounds in art, photography, graphic design and editing. Sincerely, Lois Ring, Chair Edina Public Art Committee Work Session It III. Edina Historical Society 4711 West 70" Street, Edina, MN 55435 To: Edina City Manager Scott Neal, Mayor Jim Hovland, and City Council Members From: Edina Historical Society Re: Annual stipend - restoration of funding Date: August 25, 2010 Beginning with the 2008 budget, the Edina City Council authorized an annual stipend to the Edina Historical Society. The amount began at $10,000 for 2008 and 2009. In 2010, the amount was cut in half to $5,000. In 2011, the stipend was partially restored to $7,500. We respectfully request a restoration of funding to at least $10,000 for budget year 2011 to continue to staff the Edina History Museum and continue to provide free programs and research assistance to the public. This year, the Society increased staff hours to 30 hours per week (compared to 20 per week in 2010) to handle our multiple projects and increase public hours on Thursday by two hours. Benefit to the city The Edina Historical Society has funded several projects that directly benefit the City of Edina, including: • Using a member's donation to fund $7,000 in air - conditioners at Tupa Park to make the building useable 12 months a year and safely house artifacts stored there. • Increasing number of free public open houses at Tupa Park's historic buildings, Minnehaha Grange No. 398 and Cahill School. • Creating our upcoming Growing Up in Edina: A Show and Tell Exhibit, which spotlights the city's park and rec programs, as well as the many aspects that make Edina a great place to "live learn, raise families and do business:' • Planning for the city's upcoming 125th anniversary in 2013. • Educating residents about their neighborhoods through walking /driving tours. • Researching and providing historic photos and information for city meetings and publications. • Organizing and storing the city's historic tax assessor records and assisting residents with house research. • Purchasing of archival supplies to safely store the city- related collections; • Creating the 2010 -2011 exhibit Edina's Greatest Generation: On the Home Front and the Front Lines and assisting with research of veterans for the proposed veteran's memorial project at Utley Park. In addition, the Edina Historical Society benefits city residents and contributes to the quality of life in Edina in several other ways. • We staff a free museum and research library (located at Arneson Acres Park), with exhibits about Edina and resources for visitors to learn about their neighborhood, home, family, community and school; • We house several community organizations' records, providing archives space much safer than members' garages and basements; • Edina school children learn about pioneer life and their own community by experiencing a 1900 school day at historic Cahill School and Minnehaha Grange Hall (located at Tupa Park); • Staff and volunteers provide history tours and programs to community groups and schools; Page I 6 Edina Historical Society 1 4711 West 70" Street, Edina, NIN 55435 We publicize Edina and its unique history through a monthly feature in Edina Magazine, through our new web site (edinahistoricalsociety.org), and a quarterly newsletter; We preserve Edina residents' memories: through oral histories and through collection and preservation of such items as photos and menus from Clancy's Drug, the weather vane from one of the last working farms, and the original entrance sign to Rolling Green neighborhood. Current funding The Edina Historical Society has actively sought funding from other sources to make up the difference in reduced city funding and continue to expand our programming. We have stabilized our field trip income from Cahill School by offering summer day camp and history- themed birthday parties to offset a downturn in our school year bookings. Many schools have drastically cut or eliminated school field trips; we have continued to see a decline again in school bookings so far for the 2010 -2011 school year. It is important to note that, despite the economy, our members have continued to support us at the same level as in past years. We continue to attract new members by offering programs that reach diverse audiences: young families as well as senior citizens, newcomers as well as natives, historic neighborhoods as well as newer developments. Charter member Donna Skagerberg's estate donated $10,000 this year; we used $7,000 of that donation to fund air - conditioning units at Tupa Park so that we could offer summer programming. The buildings would otherwise stand empty for more than three months of the year. The Golden Kiwanis have turned over their successful concert fundraiser to the Society, beginning in 2012. We hope to raise $4,000 to $12,000 as the Kiwanis have done in the past. We hope to earmark those funds for the improving the Edina History Museum permanent exhibit, which has not been changed for more than 20 years and is missing key pieces of city history, including its black pioneer farmers, the success of its schools, and community events after 1956. The Edina Historical Society raises funds so that we can continue to offer free history programming to the community. We do not charge for museum admission, research assistance, school museum tours or public programs. Our mission is to "collect, preserve and interpret the history of Edina;' we believe that we need to do more than find and house historic artifacts - we also must connect the community with its history. 2012 Budget The Edina Historical Society Board of Directors requests at least a partial restoration in the city grant to continue to staff the museum at Arneson Acres Park. We are happy to answer any questions you might have at a Council meeting or contact EHS Board President Frank Cardarelle, 952 =929 -2761 (home), 952-941-3031 (cell). The Edina Historical Society formed in 1969 because the City of Edina saw a need to preserve the early history of the community before it was lost forever. The city has consistently showed its commitment to the community's heritage and we are grateful for its long -term support. cc: John Wallin, John Keprios Page 2 a !1 - -- lv 8M6 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. WS IV From: Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director ❑ Action ® Discussion ❑ Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Review 2012 -2016 Capital Improvement Plan Recommendation: See attached CIP for discussion at the worksession. No formal action is expected. Info /Background: Please find attached a full copy of the proposed 2012 -2016 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to be discussed. 1 1 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2012 -2016 EDINA CITY COUNCIL Mayor James Hovland Councilmember Joni Bennett Councilmember Mary Brindle Councilmember Josh Sprague Councilmember Ann Swenson CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA i O e `L TABLE OF CONTENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESCRIPTION PAGE ..Y POLICY 1 FINANCING 2 CIP SUMMARY • Construction Fund Balance 7 • Capital Improvement Plan Summary 9 DETAIL PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS • Aquatic Center 17 • Arena 24 • Art Center 30 • Centennial Lakes 34 • Edinborough Park 45 • General Government 65 • Golf Course 78 • Housing and Redevelopment Authority 88 • Liquor Stores 91 • Park & Recreation 104 • Public Safety 117 • Public Works 131 • Utilities 149 �i A CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA fo ei r En FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The goal of the City's CIP is, to develop, a comprehensive program for use by decision makers to guide capital investments based on an assessment of the community's needs, taking into account the best use of limited resources while providing efficient and effective municipal services': The City' will develop a five -year plan for capital improvements and update it annually. The CIP process includes analyzing projects contributing to the public health and welfare, projects helping to - maintain and improve the "efficiency of the existing systems, and projects that define a future need within the community. The City will identify the estimated cost and potential funding sources for each capital project proposal in the CIP -. Purchase contracts for equipment and projects included in the CIP must still be properly authorized according to the City's Purchasing Policy. The CIP will include equipment and projects from any City fund. Adopted by City Council February 20, 2007 Revisions: March 20, 2007 December 15, 2009 Page 1 9t �� CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ee r`` te FINANCING atY, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Planning for capital improvements requires sound and economical financing. The City of Edina is able to utilize several financing mechanisms ranging from cash reserves to special - purpose funds as well as borrowing through bond sales. The exact financing method for each improvement is based on the general policies, jurisdictions and legal requirements. The final selection and scheduling of proposed capital improvements is then based on the ability of the City to draw upon various funds. The total cost for each project includes construction costs, administration costs and interest. In analyzing the financial viability of the capital improvements in the current plan, the following methods of financing were examined: INTERNAL METHODS: Special Assessments — Special assessments are based on the concept that when land is benefited from a particular improvement, all or part of the costs of the improvement should be levied against those properties to finance such improvements. Since it often takes several years for the City to collect special assessments, the City may decide to issue bonds for cash flow purposes. See Public Improvement Revolving Bonds for further description of this financing tool. Enterprise Funds — The City's enterprise funds include the Aquatic Center, Arena, Art Center, Edinborough, Centennial Lakes, Golf Course, Liquor Stores, and Utilities. Capital Improvements and equipment purchased in the enterprise funds may be financed through enterprise fund revenues derived from user charges for the respective services, when available. Enterprise funds are designed for self - sustaining operations. Page 2 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 0 Pi FINANCING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN :When an enterprise_ fund does not have enough cash'to pay for a specific project, the City may decide to use money from another City source (usually 'the Construction Fund) or the: City may decide to issue Enterprise Revenue Bonds: ,See below for further description of these financing methods. Tax Increment (TIF) Funds — These funds are derived from .tax increment districts including 50th and France, Southeast Edina, Grandview, and 70h Street and Cahill Road. In tax increment districts, property owners pay ad valorem taxes at the full rate levied by the units of local government within the taxing jurisdiction. At the time the tax increment district is created, property values are "frozen ". The units of local government receive taxes based on the frozen property values. Any additional taxes paid by property owners based on the increase in property values since ,the district was created is known as the "increment ". The increment revenue is then used to finance physical improvements within the district. The City may decide to issue Tax Increment Bonds for cash flow purposes, see below for further description of these bonds. Construction Fund — This fund is designed to provide financing for capital, improvements. Revenues for this fund may be derived' from such sources as.-investment income, rental income and transfers from other. funds. Other — Other internal funding options available include tax levies, income on City, investments, and reserves. Page 3 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA o @A' te ten: O, FINANCING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXTERNAL METHODS: Municipal State Aid (MSA) — The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) provides funding assistance for improvements to those municipal streets which are designated as part of its MSA system. Money for this fund is supplied with a dedicated portion of revenues collected from road use and gasoline taxes. Funds are released for improvements on those streets on the system whose design and construction meet MSA standards. Funds may be expended for any street on the MSA system at any time, and MSA funds may be accumulated over several years. Minnesota Department of Transportation - MnDOT provides financing assistance for maintenance and improvements on those highways included in the MnDOT trunk highway system and federal interstate system. These improvements could include intersecting local or county streets. In the City of Edina, these highways are Nos. 62, 100, 169 and 494. Improvements on these highways must meet State trunk highway standards before MnDOT releases funds. Other - Other external sources of financing include grants, donations, and other local governments. DEBT: Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds — PIR bonds are issued to provide immediate liquidity to complete public improvement projects and are repaid with special assessment receipts over a ten -year period. These bonds are supported through special assessments, therefore no levy is required. Page 4 t 4tA;T CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 4r+Y O FINANCING "` "'```' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Enterprise Revenue Bonds — Most of the Enterprise Revenue Bonds that the City issues pay for Utility Fund project costs, but the City may issue Enterprise Revenue Bonds for any of our enterprises. These bonds are repaid with revenues from the enterprise facilities that benefit from the projects financed, therefore no levy is required. Tax Increment Bonds — The City may issue Tax r Increment Bonds to pay project costs when the district does not have sufficient cash. These bonds are repaid with the Tax Increment revenue that is generated by the district; therefore no additional levy is required. Public Project Lease Revenue Bonds — This debt is issued' through the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to procure capital equipment or facilities supported with a lease purchase relationship agreement with the City. These bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City and supported through an ad valorem special levy by an annual appropriation. Capital Improvement Bonds - Capital Improvement bonds may be issued only for 'certain' projects, including city halls, public safety buildings, public works facilities and libraries. These bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City and supported through the property tax levy. Other General Obligation (GO) — There are several other types of GO debt available for the City to use. Although no new issues are included in this plan, the City currently has park & recreation bonds and equipment certificates outstanding. Both of these types of GO debt require a levy. Page 5 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA o e FINANCING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ®Enterprise Revenue *Tax Increment *Public Imp Revolving *Public Project ■General Obligation Current $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $- City of Edina Debt and Projected (In Thousands) I t I I j i i 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 This chart shows the projected effect on the City as a whole if future debt is issued according to this capital improvement plan. The General Obligation bonds category shown here includes Capital Improvement bonds, park and recreation bonds and equipment certificates Page 6 y91�'Al CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA e ,; 7 Cn CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Projected Construction Fund Unreserved Fund Balance Revenues Property taxes Special Assessment License and permits Intergovernmental Charges for service Interest (1.5 %) Total Revenues Expenditures General Government Park 8 Rec Public Safety Public Works Total Expenditures Estimate Budget Forecast 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 679,789 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,072 1,303,833 1,329,343 1,380,052 1,298,932 1,334,785 1,142,485 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 4,490,000 50,000 50,000 2,028,200 466,000 1,130,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 102,611 151,600 120,100 111,700 101,400 95,000 6,651,233 2,598,015 2,617,224 4,505,904 2,969,257 3,434,557 135,000 259,500 513,600 307,700 238,900 92,000 742,000 1,097,500 650,000 533,000 742,325 783,255 722,587 1,041,809 332,340 859,345 433,925 292,034 10,757,000 4,905,000 5,000,000 6,799,000 5,635,000 5,760,000 12,356,587 7,303,809 6,495,940 8,499,045 7,050,150 6,927,289 Other Financing Sources /(Uses) Transfers In/(Out) 352,000 (525,000) (129,800) (141,000) (27,000) (65,000) PIR Bonds 3,307,764 3,131,700 3,451,500 3,444,300 3,684,700 3,003,000 Total Other Sources 3,659,764 2,606,700 3,321,700 3,303,300 3,657,700 2,938,000 Increase (Decrease) $ (2,045,590) $ (2,099,094) $ (557,016) $ (689,841) $ (423,193) $ (554,732) Beginning Balance $ 12,150,968 $ 10,105,378 $ 8,006,284 $ 7,449,268 $ 6,759,427 $ 6,336,234 Ending Balance $ 10,105,378 $ 8,006,284 $ 7,449,268 $ 6,759,427 $ 6,336,234 $ 5,781,502 Construction Fund Unreserved Balance Trend $16,000,000 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Actual) and Next Five Fiscal Years (Estimate) $12,000,000 1:1 Designated for Construction DDesignated for Equipment $8,000,000 /\ $4,000,000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 The charts above show the projected impact this CIP will have on the Construction Fund along with a ten -year history of Construction Fund balances. The 2002 balance was abnormally high due to a bond issue for City Hall, the majority of which was spent in 2003. Page 7 This page left bank intentionally. Page 8 City of Edina, MN Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total JAquatic Center Arena Total 265,000 95,000 140,000 50,000 140,000 690,000 Flowrider AQC-03-001 n/a 430,000 95,000 140,000 50,000 140,000 430,000 Flowrider Completion AQC-12-001 n/a 100,000 100,000 Replace Heaters AQC-12-002 n/a 70,000 140,000 690,000 70,000 Pool Deck Repairs AQC-12-003 n/a 50,000 50,000 Bathhouse Roof and Other Improvements AQC-12-004 n/a Art Center Parking Lot Expansion 50,000 n/a 85,000 50,000 Replace Pool Filters AQC-12-005 n/a 85,000 HVAG ART-11-005 60,000 60,000 SCS Play Structure AQC-12-006 n/a 22,800 Media Studio Updates ART-11-006 n/a 300,000 300,000 12,000 Aquatic Center Total 600,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 300,000 1,060,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 Aquatic Center Fund 600,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 300,000 1,060,000 Aquatic Center Total 600,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 300,000 1,060,000. lArena Replace Zamboni A-09-002 n/a 140,000 140,000 Water System Repairs A-10-003 n/a 60,000 60,000 Replace Zamboni A-10-004 n/a 140,000 140,000 Parking Lot Resurfacing A-11-001 n/a 125,000 35,000 160,000 Replace Zamboni A-12-001 n/a 140,000 140,000 Make-up Water Tanks A-12-002 n/a 50,000 50,000 Aft Center Total 85,000 22,800 32,000 20,000 - 20,000 179,800 Construction Fund 85,000 22,800 32,000 20,000 -20,000 179,800' Page 9 Arena Total 265,000 95,000 140,000 50,000 140,000 690,000 ,Construction Fund 265,000 95,000 140,000 50,000 140,000 HOMO Arena Total 265,000 95,000 140,000 50,000 140,000 690,000 Art Center Parking Lot Expansion ART -11 -004 n/a 85,000 85,000 HVAG ART-11-005 n/a 22,800 22,800 Media Studio Updates ART-11-006 n/a 12,000 12,000 Repairs & Maintenance ART-12-001 n/a 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 Aft Center Total 85,000 22,800 32,000 20,000 - 20,000 179,800 Construction Fund 85,000 22,800 32,000 20,000 -20,000 179,800' Page 9 Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Art Center Total 85,000 22,800 32,000 20,000 20,000 179,800 Centennial Lakes Park Replaster Pool EP -00 -017 Replace Carpeting EP -06 -007 Security Camera System EP -08 -007 Replace HVAC Units CL -06 -005 n/a EP -08 -021 Lift to Birthday Party Area 25,000 Track Floor 25,000 Paint South Park Railings CL -08 -003 n/a 28,000 North Sidewalk EP -10 -011 Track Air Conditioning 28,000 Renovate Putting Greens CL -08 -004 n/a 25,000 Interior Entryway Doors EP -11 -008 Upstairs Restroom Remodel 25,000 Add Restroom Facility CL -09 -007 n/a 120,000 Pool Boiler EP -12 -002 Park Boiler 120,000 Replace Park Sound System CL -09 -008 n/a 32,000 32,000 Replace Concrete CL -09 -009 n/a 15,000 15,000 Centrum Planter Beds CL -10 -006 n/a 20,000 20,000 Paver Replacement CL -11 -001 n/a 32,000 32,000 New Pickup CL -11 -002 n/a 25,000 25,000 Paver Replacement CL -11 -003 n/a 20,000 20,000 Replace HVAC Units CL -12 -001 n/a 25,000 25,000 Centennial Lakes Park Total 205,000 47,000 45,000 45,000 25,000 367,000 Construction Fund 205,000 47,000 45,000 45,000 25,000 367,000 Centennial Lakes Park Total JEdinborough Park Replaster Pool EP -00 -017 Replace Carpeting EP -06 -007 Security Camera System EP -08 -007 Soft Play for Great Hall EP -08 -011 Pool and Wall Tile EP -08 -021 Lift to Birthday Party Area EP -09 -014 Track Floor EP -09 -015 Concrete repairs EP -09 -016 Adventure Peak Remodel EP -09 -021 North Sidewalk EP -10 -011 Track Air Conditioning EP -11 -005 Adventure Peak Wave Slide EP -11 -006 Exterior Entryway Doors EP -11 -007 Interior Entryway Doors EP -11 -008 Upstairs Restroom Remodel EP -11 -009 Adventure Peak Renovation EP -11 -010 Lighting retrofit EP -12 -001 Pool Boiler EP -12 -002 Park Boiler EP -12 -003 Pond and Waterfall Renovation EP -12 -004 205,000 47,000 45,000 45,000 25,000 367,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a 40,000 n/a n/a We n/a 125,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 55,000 n/a n/a n/a Page 10 70,000 12,000 12,000 80,000 40,000 65,000 25,000 30,000 65,000 80,000 25,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 12,000 25,000 20,000 70,000 12,000 12,000 40,000 80,000 40,000 65,000 125,000 25,000 30,000 65,000 25,000 80,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 55,000 12,000 25,000 20,000 I Department Project# Priority 2.012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total '35,000 Mobile switcher system COM -10 -001 n/a 59,500 30,000 Edinborough Park Total 220,000 215,000 174,000 162,000 .130,000 901,000 34,500 Graphics COM -10 -006 n/a Construction Fund �j 220,000 215,000 174,000 162,000 Council Chambers Camera System , Mnborough Park ToAd 70,000 70,000 Council Chambers Monitors 220,000 215,000 174,000 162,000 130,000 90110001, JGeneral Government 175,000 268,000 110,000 110,000 '35,000 Mobile switcher system COM -10 -001 n/a 59,500 30,000 172,700 30,000 Remote Production Capability COM -10 -005 n/a 34,500 34,500 Graphics COM -10 -006 n/a 488,600 70,000 213,900 67,000 70,000 Council Chambers Camera System COM -10 -007 n/a 70,000 70,000 Council Chambers Monitors COM-10 -008 n/a 29,000 29,000 Tightrope Cablecast System COM -10 -009 n/a 135,000 145,000 155,000 46,000 46,000 VGA Routing Systems COM -10 -010 n/a n/a 40,000 50,000 12,000 12,000 Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling CW -02 -001 2 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 New Election Equipment GG -11 -003 n/a Braemar. Cart Paths and Tees 138,000 n/a 20,000 138,000 Electronic Document Management GG -11 -004 n/a 65,000 50,000 GC -12 -005 n/a 115,000 City Hall/Public Works Building GG -12 -001 n/a 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000 Assessing Department Equipment Replacement GG -12 -002 n/a 15,000 25,000 30,000 45,000 IT Department Equipment Replacement GG -12 -003 n/a 25,000 105,600 43,700 27,900 20,000 222,200 General Government Total 234,500 488,600 282,700 213,900 67,000 1,286,700 Construction Fund 175,000 268,000 110,000 110,000 '35,000 698,000 Equipment Replacement Program 59,500 220,600 172,700 103,900, 32,000 588,700, i General Government Total 234,500 488,600 .282,700 213,900 67,000 1,286;700 Golf Course Braemar. Maintenance Equipment GC -12 -001 n/a 135,000 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 750,000 Braemar. Miscellaneous Equipment GC -12 -002 n/a 40,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 255,000 Golf Dome: Structural Building Repair GC -12 -003 n/a 140,000 140,000 Braemar. Cart Paths and Tees GC -12 -004 n/a 20,000 20,000. Driving Range Expansion GC -12 -005 n/a 550,000 550,000 Braemar. Carpeting GC -12 -006 n/a 25,000 25,000 Braemar. Slit Drainage 3 Fairways GC -12 -007 n/a 110,000 110,000 Braemar. Clubhouse Roof Replacement GC -12 -008 n/a 80,000 80,000 160,000 Braemar. Cart Paths 1 -9 GC -12 -009 n/a 100,000 100,000 Braemar: Cart Paths 10 -18 GC -12 -010 n/a 100,000 100,000 ........... .. Golf Course Total 335,000 770,000 395,000 390,000 320,000 2,210,000 Golf Course Fund 175,000 195,000 205,000 210,000 220,000 1,005,000 Unfunded 160,000 575,000 190,000 180,000 100,000 1,205,000; Page 11 Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Page 12 Golf Course Total 335,000 770,000 395,000 390,000 320,000 2,210,000 HRA Promenade Phase IV HRA -11 -001 n/a 3,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 Promenade Phase III HRA -11 -002 n/a 2,000,000 2,000,000 France Ave and TH62 Reconstruction HRA -11 -003 n/a 200,000 16,000,000 16,200,000 HM Total 3,200,000 3,000,000 16,000,000 22,200,000 MWDOT 1,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 Tax Increment Funds 2,100,000 3,100,000 11,000,000 16,200,000 BRA Total 3,100,000 3,100,000 16,000,000 22,200,000 LLiquor Stores 50th: Store Remodel LIQ -02 -005 n/a 100,000 100,000 York: Store Remodel LIQ -09 -002 n/a 300,000 300,000 50th: Replace Entrance Door LIQ -09 -003 n/a 20,000 20,000 York: Replace Entrance Door LIQ -10 -003 n/a 25,000 25,000 York: Replace Rooftop HVAC LIQ -10 -004 n/a 25,000 25,000 50,000 York: LED Signage LIQ -10 -005 n/a 20,000 20,000 Vernon: Replace Load Leveler Dock LIQ -10 -006 n/a 15,000 15,000 Al Stores: Repairs and Maintenance LIQ -11 -001 n/a 35,000 60,000 25,000 120,000 50th: LED Lights LIQ -11 -002 n/a 10,000 10,000 Vernon: LED Lights LIQ -11 -003 n/a 10,000 10,000 All Stores: Video & Software Upgrades LIQ -11 -004 n/a 20,000 20,000 40,000 Vernon: Replace Rooftop HVAC LIQ -11 -005 n/a 25,000 25,000 Vernon: Replace Entrance & Exit Doors LIQ -11 -006 n/a 30,000 30,000 Liquor Stores Total 365,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 765,000 Liquor Fund 365,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 765,000 Liquor Stores Total 365,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 765,000 Park & Recreation Pamela Park: Renovate senior athletic field PK -00 -033 We 330,000 330,000 Pamela Park: New athletic field PK -07 -004 n/a 400,000 400,000 Lewis Park: Pathway lighting PK -08 -006 n/a 30,000 30,000 Natural resources inventory assessment PK -09 -005 n/a 100,000 100,000 Countryside Park: Playground & Pathway PK -10 -004 n/a 330,000 330,000 Pamela Park: South Parking Lot Expansion PK -10 -005 n/a 40,000 40,000 Pamela Park: North Parking Lot Expansion PK -10 -006 n/a 45,000 45,000 Pamela Park: West Parking Lot Expansion PK -10 -007 n/a 60,000 60,000 Page 12 Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Rosland Park: Pathway Renovation PK -11 -005 n/a 250,000 Bredeson Park: Comfort Station Renovation PK -11 -006 n/a Normandale Park: Replace Warming House/Shelter PK -11 -007 n/a Parks Department Equipment Replacement PK -12 -001 n/a 367,500 VanValkenburg Park construction PK -12 -002 n/a 250,000 75,000 75,000 650,000 650,000 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 646,080 600,000 600,000 Park & Recreation Total 1,047,500 600,000 483,000 692,325 733,255 3,556,080 Construction Fund Equipment Replacement Program 680,000 580,000 400,000 650,000 600,000 2,910,000 367,500 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 646,080 Park & Recreation Total 1,047,500 600,000 483,000 692,325 733,255 3,556,080 Public Safety Police to Community Software PS -11 -005 n/a 24,000 24,000 Fire Department Equipment Replacement PS -12 -001 n/a 359,000 195,000 25,000 25,000 604,000 Police Department Equipment Replacement PS -12 -002 n/a 624,809 38,000 824,345 258,925 192,034 1,938,113 Inspections Department Equipment Replacement PS -12 -003 n/a 15,000 15,000 Health Department Equipment Replacement PS -12 -004 n/a 16,500 16,500 PD Transcription Software PS -12 -005 n/a 13,000 13,000 PD Ballistic Vests PS -12 -006 n/a 34,300 34,300 PD Alarm Billing Software PS -12 -007 n/a 41,040 41,040 PD License Plate Reader PS -12 -008 n/a 20,000 20,000 PD Radio Equipment PS -12 -009 n/a 150,000 150,000 PD Security Cameras PS -12 -010 n/a 75,000 75,000 FD Chest Compression Devices PS-12 -011 n/a 28,500 28,500 PD Dispatch Phone System PS -12 -012 n/a 200,000 200,000 PD In -Squad Video System PS -12 -013 n/a 90,000 90,000 Public Safety Total 1,241,809 422,340 859,345 433,925 292,034 3,249,453 Construction Fund 41,500 99,340 20,000 150,000 75,000 385,840 Equipment Replacement Program 1,000,309 233,000 839,345 283,925 217,034 2,573,613 PD Special Revenue Fund 200,000 90,000 290,000 Public Safety Total 1,241,809 422,340 859,345 433,925 292,034 3,249,453 Public Works Concrete Rehab: Parklawn Ave. (France to W 77) PW -00 -074 n/a 450,000 450,000 Reconstruct W 62nd St (Oaklawn - France) PW -01 -011 n/a 520,000 520,000 Reconstruct W 54th St (Wooddale to France) - PW -01 -012 n/a 850,000 850,000 Public Works: Braemar Cold Storage: Improvements PW -02 -006 n/a 40,000 40,000 80,000 Reconstruct: W 58th St (France to Xerxes) PW -03 -005 n/a 629,000 629,000 Reconstruct: W 58th St (Wooddale to France) PW -04 -001 n/a 900,000 900,000 Bridge: 54th Street Bridge PW -05 -003 n/a 520,000 520,000 Page 13 i Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Mill & Overlay: Olinger Blvd (Vernon - Tracy) PW -05 -006 n/a 4,655,000 4,750,000 275,000 5,385,000 5,510,000 275,000 Braemar Cold Storage - Fire Suppression PW -08 -004 n/a 70,000 150,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 70,000 Skid Steer PW -08 -005 n/a 370,000 60,000 55,000 45,000 480,000 60,000 Centennial Lakes Bridge Painting PW -11 -005 3 50,000 50,000 2,028,200 70,000 1,130,000 70,000 GPS Electrical System PW -11 -006 n/a 4,425,000 4,415,800 4,724,000 30,000 21,429,800 30,000 Neighborhood Street Recon Program PW -12 -001 n/a 4,015,000 4,425,000 4,120,000 4,620,000 3,580,000 20,760,000 Sidewalks/Pathways (MSA) PW -12 -002 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Sidewalks/Pathways: City Costs PW -12 -003 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Public Works Equipment Replacement PW -12 -004 n/a 345,000 125,000 55,000 45,000 480,000 1,050,000 PW Fuel Canopy PW -12 -005 n/a 60,000 200,000 60,000 Vehical Management Software Upgrade PW -12 -007 n/a 25,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 7,600,000 25,000 Page 14 Public Works Total 4,655,000 4,750,000 6,549,000 5,385,000 5,510,000 26,649,000 Construction Fund 220,000 150,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 620,000 Equipment Replacement Program 370,000 125,000 55,000 45,000 480,000 1,075,000 Municipal State Aid 50,000 50,000 2,028,200 466,000 1,130,000 3,724,200 Public Improvement Revolving Bonds 4,015,000 4,425,000 4,415,800 4,724,000 3,850,000 21,429,800 Public Works Total 4,655,000 4,750,000 6,549,000 5,385,000 5,510,000 26,849,000 (Utility Department 1998 Cat Backhoe Replacement UT -03 -012 n/a 170,000 170,000 Public Works: Braemar Work Site - Lead Removal UT -04 -005 n/a 200,000 200,000 Lift Station #8 (4023 Monterey Ave) UT -05 -010 2 200,000 200,000 New Water Treatment Plant ( #5) UT -07 -002 2 1,600,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 7,600,000 New Water Treatment Plant (#6) UT -07 -003 2 3,000,000 3,000,000 Sewer Jetter Replacement UT -07 -008 3 350,000 350,000 Piping Wells #5 and #18 to WTP #5 UT -08 -008 2 100,000 100,000 Well #5 (West 69th Street) UT -08 -009 2 100,000 100,000 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining Project UT -08 -014 n/a 60,000 540,000 600,000 1,200,000 SCADA Upgrades UT -09 -006 2 50,000 50,000 Well #12 Rehab Project UT -09 -009 2 120,000 120,000 Well # 2 Rehab Project UT -09 -010 2 120,000 120,000 Water Meter Replacement Project UT -10 -006 1 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 1,200,000 Well #9 Rehab Project UT -10 -008 2 150,000 150,000 Well # 11 Rehab Project UT -10 -009 1 120,000 120,000 Manhole Repair Project UT -10 -010 2 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 W 69th Street and York Ave Water Main Loop UT -10 -011 2 110,000 110,000 Pond & Lake Dredging UT -11 -004 3 60,000 1,100,000 60,000 120,000 1,340,000 Annual Vehicle Replacements UT -11 -005 3 70,000 75,000 50,000 195,000 Well #10 Rehab Project UT -11 -006 2 100,000 100,000 Storm Water Lift Station #3 Rehab UT -11 -007 2 200,000 200,000 Sewer Camera and Cable Reel UT -11 -008 2 30,000 30,000 Page 14 t Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Water Main Improvements UT -12 -001 n/a 925,000 828,000 805,000 1,104,000 726,000 4,388,000 Sanitary Sewer Main Improvements UT -12 -002 1 790,000 722,000 690,000 931,000 635,000 3,768,000 Storm Sewer - Pipe and Grading Improvements UT- 12 -003, n/a 1,755,000 1,331,000 1,250,000 1,440,000 1,130,000 6,906,000 PW Generator UT -12 -004 n/a 100,000 100,000 30 Kw Generator UT -12 -005 n/a 30,000 32 549 000 30,000 Well No 8 UT -12 -006 n/a 35,000 35,000 SCADA Radio System Upgrade UT -12 -007 n/a 60,000 60,000 Cityworks Assett Management Update UT -12 -008 n/a 62,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 287,000 Cooper Cirde Pond Outlet UT -12 -009 n/® 80,000 80,000 Utility Department Total 8,262,000 7,106,000 6,725,000 7,495,000 2,961;000 j2,549,000 Equipment `Replacement ,Prot; ram '25,000 `,25,00( ,;Utility `F,unds -San Swr .-l-,621,000" °` 1,397,000 ° =1;430;000 951,000 :655,000 ' . ' A;054;00( UtilitysFunds- SlmSwr •= 1,855,000,, 2;536,000. 1;520000, 1;580,000 :1;�150000,,'a- `8 64100( _. 'Utility,F<unds ='Wtr (_4 761000„ 3173,000 ;3;775 000 4`964;000 1X156 000 17 829 00( K ` Uhlity, Deparment Total 8 262 000 7106 000 6 725 000 - ; 7 495 000 2 961000 32 549 000 Grand Total 20,715,809 17,666,740 15,835,045 15,047,150 26,598,289 95,863,033 , Page 15 This page left bank intentionally. Page 16 Project a AQC -03 -001 Project Name Flowrider 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Aquatic Center Useful Life Unassigned Contaet Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a. Description Purchase and installation of a flowrider on the south side of the Aquatic Center. Justification To continue to diversify the Edina Aquatic Center's offerings staff is recommending the addition of a Flowrider. This amenity would not only help further diversify the facility, it would bring the aquatic industries hottest new amenity to the Edina Aquatic Center. The constant uphill flow of water will provide a surfing sensation that is not otherwise found in the Midwest. In addition to providing the patrons with a challenging new amenity, it will draw spectators to watch those brave enough to perfect their skills. It should also be noted that this new amenity would not be included in the daily admission fee or season ticket pass, but will be used as an additional revenue source. This amenity will complete the Aquatic Center master Olari. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 430,000 430,000 Total 430,000 430,000 Funding Sources. 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Aquatic Center Fund 430,000 430,000 Total 430,000 430,000 's. Page 17 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN [PI-1-1ject ect a AQC -12 -001 Name Flowrider Completion Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Park Development Complete the Flowrider installation. 2012 thru 2016 Department Aquatic Center Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification We need to remove the access road, do restoration planting, relocate trash bins, provide shade and themed wall. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total Funding Sources 100,000 2012 2013 100,000 2014 2015 2016 Total Aquatic Center Fund 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 18 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # AQC -12 -002 Project Name Replace Heaters 2012 rhru 2016 Type Equipment Department Aquatic Center Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a 7iDtion ace the bathhouse water heaters and two pool heaters. Justification The water heaters were installed in 1997 and the pool heaters 2002. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Funding Sources 2012 -2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Aquatic Center Fund 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Page 19 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # AQC -12 -003 Project Name Pool Deck Repairs 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department Aquatic Center Jseful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a riDtion ace sections of pool deck and/or north trellis. Justification Some areas of the pool deck are still original, but showing their age. The pressure treated wood is shrinking and splitting. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 50,000 50,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 50,000 2013 2014 50,000 2015 2016 Total Aquatic Center Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Page 20 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# AQC -12 -004 Project Name Bathhouse Roof and Other Improvements 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department, Aquatic Center Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Replace the bathhouse roof, air conditioners and concession equipment. Justification The bathouse was built in 1997 and the roof, air conditioners and concession equipment have most likely reached their expected life. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 . Total Construction /Maintenance 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Aquatic Center Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 . A�V -li -V VJ I Project Name Replace Pool Filters Type Unassigned Department Aquatic Center Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Descri tion Replace pool filters. .. Justification The pool filters were installed in 1997 and reached their expected life. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles %Furnishings 60,000 .60,000 Funding Sources, 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Aquatic Center Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 6,000 Page 22 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Iroject # AQC -12 -006 'roject Name SCS Play Structure Type Unassigned Useful Life Category Equipment Replacement Replace SCS play structure. 2012 thru 2016 Department Aquatic Center Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification The SCS Zero Depth Pool play structure was installed in 1997 and may need replacing. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 300,000 300,000 Total 300,000 300,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Aquatic Center Fund 300,000 300,000 Total 300,000 300,000 Page 23 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # A -09 -002 Project Name Replace Zamboni Type Equipment Useful Life Category Equipment Replacement the 1996 ice resurfacing machine. 2012 thru 2016 Department Arena Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification I This is a routine equipment replacement purchase. The 1996 zamboni will be 16 years old in 2012 and due to be replaced. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles/Fumishings 140,000 140,000 Total 140,000 140,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 140,000 140,000 Total 140,000 140,000 Page 24 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN F ect # A -10 -003 ect Name Water System Repairs Type Improvement seful Life Category Building Improvements 1ption ,se osmosis system. 2012 thru 2016 Department Arena Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a 3 Justification Current water softener systems are old and outdated. Reverse osmosis system would save costs in salt. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 .2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# A -10 -004 Project Name Replace Zamboni 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Arena Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Replace the 2001 east arena ice resurfacing machine. Justification This is a routine equipment replacement purchase. The 2001 zamboni will be 15 years old in 2016 and due to be Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 140,000 140,000 Total 140,000 140,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 140,000 140,000 Total 140,000 140,000 Page 26 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # A -11 -001 Project Name Parking Lot Resurfacing Type Improvement Department Arena Useful Life Unassigned Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a Descriution Resurface Braemar Arena parking lot in three sections; first the main parking lot, second the west parking "lot; and third Ikola Way. Justification The existing asphalt is deteriorated and at the end of it's life. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 125,000 35,000 160,000 Total 125,000 35,000 160,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 125,000 35,000 160,000 Total 125,000 ., 35,000 160,000 - i Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# A -12 -001 Project Name Replace Zamboni Type Equipment Useful Life Category Equipment Replacement the 1997 ice resurfacing machine. 2012 thru 2016 Department Arena Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification This is a routine equipment replacement purchase. The 1997 zamboni will be 17 years old in 2014 and due to be replaced. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 140,000 140,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 140,000 2013 2014 2015 140,000 2016 Total Construction Fund 140,000 140,000 Total 140,000 140,000 Page 28 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # A -12 -002 Project Name Make -up Water Tanks Type Improvement Department Arena' Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Improvements Priority n/a Description' Replace make -up water tanks in all three arenas. Justification Water tanks in all three arenas are deteriorating and need to be replaced. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 50,000 50,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 2013 50,000 .2014 2015 2016 50,000 Total Construction Fund 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Page 29 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 'roject # ART -11 -004 'rojectName Parking Lot Expansion Type Unassigned Useful Life Category Unassigned Department Art Center Contact Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 parking lot to create 10 new spots and redesign drop off area for safety. Justification The number one complaint at the Art Center is the parking situation. When cars park on the frontage road, it is a potential danger as people enter and exit their cars. We have also had several cars hit in our parking lot, since backing up to get out is tight. We need painted lines to designate where cars should be parked to optimize the area. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 85,000 85,000 Total 85,000 85,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 85,000 85,000 Total 85,000 85,000 Page 30 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a ART -11 -005 Project Name HVAC Type Unassigned Useful Life Category Unassigned Department Art Center Contact Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 ission stand alone HVAC systems, upgrade ventilation and exhaust, and tie systems together with energy lent systems. Justification - - Some of our systems are more than 35 years old and are very energy inefficient. Expenditures . 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 22,800 22,800 Total 22,800 22,800 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 22,800 22,800 Total 22,800 22,800 Page 31 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# ART -11 -006 Project Name Media Studio Updates Type Unassigned Useful Life Category Unassigned and Media Studio updates. . Department Art Center Contact Priority n/a, Justification ;' Many of our computers and media machines will be outdated. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014. 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 14000 Page 32 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# ART -12 -001 Project Name Repairs & Maintenance 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department Art Center Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Theseiareupgrades and replacements of mechanical and small capital items that unexpectedly fail or become worn or damaged and in need of replacement, repair, or upgrade. Justification Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 .60,000 Page 33 Project CLA6 -005 Project Name Replace HVAC Units Type Improvement Department Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life Unassigned Contact Park &.Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Description Replace 2 of the 4 HVAC units for the Park Centrum Building. , Justification Two of the HVAC units will be at the end of their 25 -year life expectancy. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016. Total Construction /Maintenance 25,000 :25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CL-08 -003 Project Name Paint South Park Railings 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a the ornamental metal railings in south park. Justification The railings were last painted in 2006 and will need to be stripped and repainted by then. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 28,000 28,000 Total 28,000 28,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 28,000 28,000 Total 28,000 28,000 Page 35 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CL-08 -004 Project Name Renovate Putting Greens 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a sod, re -grade greens and improve drainage on putting course. Justification Greens will be 15 years old and in need of renovation. We can get more play at a higher quality level if the tees and pin areas are well maintained. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 25,000 25,000 TOW 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Page 36 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CL-09 -007 Project Name Add Restroom Facility 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Centennial Ickes Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Improvements Priority n/a Description Build a new restroom facility just south of the existing Centrum restrooms. Justification This new facility would give park patrons access to restrooms when the Centrum is closed and would also give the park additional restrooms for larger events. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 120,000 120,000 Total 120;000 120,000 Type Equipment Department Centennial.Lakes Park Useful Life Contact Park &- Recreation Category 'Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Desch tioa Replace park sound system and speakers. Includes complete replacement of the inground speakers as well as eight amplifiers. Justification Most of our system'was installed in 2000 or earlier; and inground speakers have an expected useful life of approximately five years. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 32,000 32,000 Total 32,000 32,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 32,000 .32,000 Total 32,000 32,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # C1109 -009 Project Name Replace Concrete Type Improvement Useful Life Category sidewalk - Pathways Description Replace worn and cracked concrete. 2012 thru 2016 Department Centennial Lakes Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification Concrete has areas that are worn, cracked & broken. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 15,000 15,000 Total 15,000 15,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 15,000 15,000 Total 15,000. 15,000 Page 39 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CL-10 -006 Project Name Centrum Planter Beds Type Equipment Useful Life Category Park Development Landscape planter beds around Centrum. Justification Centrum planter beds are dated. 2012 thru 2016 Department Centennial Lakes Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Page 40 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project# CL-11 -001 Project Name Paver Replacement Type Improvement Department Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a Descrivtion Replace old pavers. as needed and'replace broken concrete on park walkways. Justification We have found that our pavers have an expected useful life of 15 -20 years. Concrete on our walkways cracks and heaves over time and needs to be replaced. Expenditures EquipNehicles /Furnishings 2012 2013 2014 2015 32,000 2016 Total 32,000 Total 32,000 32,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 32,000 32,000 Total 32,000 32,000 Page 41 a J Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# CL-11_002 Project Name New Pickup Type Equipment Useful Life Category Equipment Replacement Replace 2005 4x4 pickup. 2012 thru 2016 Department Centennial Lakes Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification We try to replace our pickup truck every 10 years. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Page 42 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City. of Edina, MN Project # CL-11 -003 Project Name Paver Replacement Type Improvement Department Centennial Lakes Park seful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a Description Replace old pavers as needed Justification We have found that our pavers have an expected useful life of 15 -20 years. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 20,000 20,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 20,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 20,000 Total Construction Fund 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Page 43 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # CL-12 -001 Project Name Replace HVAC Units Type Improvement Department Centennial Lakes Park Useful Life Unassigned Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Description Replace 2 of the 4.HVAC units for the Park Centrum Building. Justification Two of the HVAC units will be at the end'of their 25 -year life expectancy. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total., Construction /Maintenance 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000. 25,000 Page 44 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # EP -00 -017 Project Name Replaster Pool Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Unassigned Department Edinborough Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Description Replaster and restore pool shell at Edinborough Park. Justification The original pool shell at Edinborough Park is cracked and discolored and needs a new surface coat of gunite. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 70,000 70,000 Total 70,060 70,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Page 45 uty of h=a, MN Prolect #. EP -06 -007' Project Name Replace Carpeting Type Improvement Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Unassigned Contact • Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Description Replace common area carpeting at Edinborough Park. Justification Carpeting in Great Hall, stairways, and elevator was installed in 2001 and is past its prime. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Furid '12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 Page 46 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project 0 EP -08 -007 Project Name Security Camera System 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a Security camera system for Edinborough Park. Includes cameras, DVR and monitor. Justification Replace security camera system purchased in 2006 with new equipment. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 Page 47 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project 4 EP -08 -011 Project Name Soft Play for Great Hall Type Improvement Useful Life Category Park Development soft foam play area for Great Hall. 1 2012 thru 2016 Department Edinborough Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification Additional play equipment is needed for kids ages 1 -5. Adventure Peak has a very small play area designated for toddlers but the majority of the structure is geared for kids 4 -11. This would provide quality safe -play space for toddlers while further establishing ourselves in the 1 -5 year -old market. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Page 48 J Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -08 -021 Project Name Pool and Wall Tile Type Improvement seful Life Category Building Improvements pool deck and wall tile. 2012 thru 2016 Department Edinborough Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification -- Tile is original and has cracked and shifted. Exact replacements are not available and we have been patching as needed. This is a safety as well as cosmetic issue. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 -2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Page 49 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 /hru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project# EP -09 -014 Project Name Lift to Birthday Party Area Type Improvement Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Improvements Priority n/a Lift from the great hall floor to the Birthday Party Plateau - the old tot lot area. Justification This area was not designed to be handicapped accessible. We are currently providing two other birthday party sites in different locations with accessibility. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 40,000 40,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 2013 40,000 2014 2015 40,000 2016 Total Construction Fund 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Page 50 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -09 -015 Project Name Track Floor 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority 'n/a Description Replace track floor -with a similar rubber surface. Justification The track floor was originally installed in 1987 and has experienced significant wear over the years. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 '2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 65,000 65,000 TOW 65,000 65,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 65,000 '65,000 Total 65,000 65,000 Page 51 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -09 -016 Project Name Concrete repairs 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a deteriorated concrete on west sidewalk as well as concrete and drain tile near the parking ramp entrance. Justification For the west sidewalk area the concrete is deteriorated and may be a tripping hazard. For the parking ramp, drainage in the area needs to be improved to prevent water from coming into the entryway and also from seeping into the loading dock entrance/hallway underneath. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 125,000 125,000 Total 125,000 125,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 125,000 125,000 Total 125,000 125,000 Page 52 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Edina, MN 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Category Equipment Replacement Descrivtion Replace worn amenities. 'Justification Replace worn events. Refresh structure. Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Expenditures 2012 - ..2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 25,000 25,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 2013 25,000 2014 2015 25,000 2016 Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Page 53 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a EP -10 -011 Project Name North Sidewalk Type Improvement Useful Lire Category Park Development concrete sidewalks. Justification Replace deteriorating concrete. 2012 thru 2016 Department Edinborough Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Page 54 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -11 -005 Project Name Track Air Conditioning Type Improvement Useful Life Category Building Improvements Air conditioning for track/exercise area. 2012 thru 2016 Department Edinborough Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Justification We have no air conditioning in the track area and during the summer temperatures exceed 80 degrees. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 65,000 65,000 TOW 65,000 65,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 65,000 65,000 Total 65,000 65,000 Page 55 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project# EP -11 -006 Project Name Adventure. Peak Wave Slide Type Equipment Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation.: , Category .Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Description Replace triple wave slide Justification The slide is an original play feature and is wearing out. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 25,000 25,000 . Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 25,000 25;000 Total 25,000 25,000 Page 56 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -11 -007 Project Name Exterior Entryway Doors 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Edinborough Park seful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Exterior lockable doors - all four entrances. Justification Doors are original to the park and have corroded components and don't lock well. Also faded and look bad. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 .2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 80,000 2013 2014 80,000 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Page 57 i Capital Imvrovement Plan 2012 rhru 201.6 Project# EP -11 -008 Project Name Interior Entryway Doors Type improvement Department, Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Maintenance Priority n/a Description Interior doors - all four entrances. Justification Doors are original to the park and have corroded components causing instability. Also faded and look bad. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 .2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Page 58 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -11 -009 Project Name. Upstairs Restroom Remodel 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact .Park & Recreation . Category Building Improvements Priority n/a Description Tile, countertop, lighting and toilet partition replacement. J I- Justification Update to original heavily used restroom, Replace tile, fixtures, partitions and countertops. .6 Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 30,000 30,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 2013 30,000 2014 2015 2016 30,000 Total.. Construction Fund 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Page 59 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a EP -11 -010 Project Name Adventure Peak Renovation 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a Deck pad and foam pipe cover replacement. Adventure Peak was built in 2003. Justification Exterior foam and soft deck pads wear out. Safety inspection of fittings and attachments. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Page 60 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -12 -001 Project Name Lighting retrofit 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Edinborough Park seful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Improvements Priority n/a Description Replace 1000w metal halides. Justification Increase energy efficiency in the 'park and Great Hall. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 55,000 55,000 Total 55,000 55,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 55,000 55,000 Total 55,000 55,000 Page 61 J Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# EP -12 -002 Project Name Pool Boiler Type Equipment. Useful Life Category Building Maintenance Water heater for pool water. Justification I The pool boiler was installed in 2004. 2012 thru 2016 Department Edinborough Park Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 12,000 12,000 Total Page 62 12,000 12,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# EP -12 -003 Project Name Park Boiler 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Description Boiler that provides heat for pool, track, entryways, locker rooms and resirooms. Justification Current boiler was installed in 2004. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # EP -12 -004 Project Name Pond and Waterfall Renovation 2012 rhru 2016 Type Equipment Department Edinborough Park Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a Description Resurface and update pond and waterfall in grotto. Justification Pond and waterfall are almost 30 years old. Replace pumps, re- waterproof and clean and update surface. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Page 64 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina,. MN Project # COM -10 -001 Project Name Mobile switcher system 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department General Government Useful Life Contact Communications Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a scriDtibn ss CrossOver "mobile switcher system. Includes Ross CrossOver 6 mobile switcher and Mobile Studios mini - flypack tern which encloses switcher, LCD display, intercom system, and audio mixer into portable case. Justification Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Page 65 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# COM -10 -005 Project Name Remote Production Capability 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department General Government Useful Life Contact Communications Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Description I Ross CrossOver Mobile Switcher System. Includes Ross CrossOver 6 mobile switcher and Mobile Studios Mini - Flypack system which encloses switcher, LCD display, intercom system, and audio mixer into portable case. Justification Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 34,500 34,500 Total 34,500 34,500 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 34,500 34,500 Tom 34,500 34,500 Page 66 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a COM -10 -006 Project Name Graphics 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department General Government Useful Life Contact Communications Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a ,ription ace current Character Generator with HD ready system. Acceptable manufacturers: Harris, Chyron, Avid, Vizrt, nix. and Ross Video. Justification Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Page 67 i Capital Improvement Plan 2012) rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # COM -10 -007 Project Name Council Chambers Camera System Type Equipment Useful Life Category Equipment Replacement Department General Government Contact Communications Priority n/a Description Replace cameras in Council Chambers with HD compatible equipment with SD outputs available at the CCU. All cable should be HD ready so the connection to the Switcher will be plug and play at the time the switcher is upgraded to HD. Acceptable systems from Panasonic, JVC, Sony, Hitachi, and. Ikegami. Camera systems should be from the same manufacturer as the document camera. All cameras must be able to be painted to match visually for color and luminance. Lenses must be modified by Telemetrics to work with the current Robotic systems as the robotics are not due to be replaced at this time. Justification Cameras will be outdated and should be replaced with HD equipment. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles/Fumishings 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Page 68 � 1 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # COM -10 -008 Project Name Council Chambers Monitors Type Equipment Useful Life Category Equipment Replacement 2012 thru 2016 Department General Government Contact Communications Priority n/a Description Replace all monitors, including Council Chambers plasma monitors, all of the dais monitors; the lobby plasma, and all control room monitors. These can all -be straight replacements with the exception of the control room monitors. The city would like to move.to a multi -image viewer system to reduce clutter and conserve space. Currently the program and preview monitors are. CRT type monitors. It is desireable to move to LCD technology. One monitor may be split for program and preview, or they maybe discreet monitors. Program and preview monitors must be HD compatible. All incoming sources should be on a MIV type system, with auto sensing composite /SDI inputs. It is not required that these monitors sunnort HD. Justification Monitors will be at the end of their useful life and due for replacement. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 29,000 29,000 Total 29,000 29,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 29,000 29,000 Total 29,000 29,000 Page 69 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project# COM -10 -009 Project Name Tightrope Cablecast System Type Equipment Department General Government Useful Life Contact Communications Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Description. There are two options`for replacing the Tightrope Media Systems equipment. First, simply update the existing hardware to new. Second; replace-the system and service with a new system from a different.manufacturer. The new system must be capable of HD storage and, distribution. The conversion from one system to another must include a method for backing:up and restoring all content currently residing on the existing server. If a new system is chosen, any format, conversion -must take place.so all content is played out with out any degradation to the signal. If up- conversion is necessary for existing content from it's current MPEG -2 format to an HD format, that will need to be done as part of this roject. Justification The Tightrope Media Systems equpment will be due for replacement at the end of it's 10 year life cycle. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 46,000 46,000 Total 46,000 46,006 Funding.Sources 2012 .2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 46,000 46,000 '1 OW 46,000 46,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # COM -10 -010 Project Name VGA Routing Systems 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department General Government Useful Life Contact Communications Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a is possible that a design may consist of a single VGA to HD conversion point and be controlled by the Crestron .ttomation System. These designs will be approved on a case by case basis. current input points must be accommodated in the design. Most of the composite and S -Video routing will no ;er be necessary. Justification I The current system utilizes ;multitude of video formats. It is the desire of the city to consolidate the signal types to only those necessary. Any VGA signals that are coming from existing jacks and computers may be rerouted in the VGA format. Any signals that are meant for broadcast must be up converted to HD. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 Page 71 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # CW -02 -001 Project Name Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department General Government Useful Life Unassigned Contact Deputy City Manager Category Computer Network Priority 2 Very Important Joint Fiber Optic Cabling Project with Edina School District - By leveraging some of the existing fiber infrastructure from the school district, the City would provide some missing links that would allow us to make connections to Edina Fire I & 2, York Liquor and the Art Center. In return, the City would allow the school to utilize some of the City's existing fiber for their needs. This allows us to accelerate our connections at a much reduced cost versus running separate cable for our facilities exclusively. I Justification I Currently, we connect to many of our facilities through the use of T1 phone lines which cost us around $3,000 per T1 line. Some of our facilities have multiple T1 lines to accommodate both voice and data transmissions. By running fiber optic cabling to these facilites, the City could remove the operating expense of the T1 lines from the offsite budgets. There would be a small offset of annual costs associated with service contracts on the equipment needed at each end of the cabling. It would also allow us to look at Voice over IP for our telecommunications in the long run. Most of the larger facilities (Fire and Public Works) have a 3 -4 year payback of the capital costs in operating cost Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Total 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Page 72 Capital . Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GG -11 -003 Project Name New Election Equipment 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department General Government Useful Life Contact City Clerk Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Description Hennepin County has indicated that they intend to replacing our existing election equipment, which was purchased by the County in 2000. Justification The County may require Cities to purchase the equipment outright this time. If Hennepin County requires the City to purchase this equipment we will be forced to do so. There may also be some type of cost - sharing agreement. We may (potentially save a few thousand dollars annually that is currently paid to Hennepin County for our leased equipment. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equip/Vehicles /Furnishings 138,000 138,000 Total 138,000 138,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 108,000 108,000 Equipment Replacement'Progr 30,000 30,000 TOW 138,000 138,000 Page 73 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# GG -11 -004 Project Name Electronic Document Management a 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department General Government Useful Life Contact City Clerk Category Computer Software Priority n/a a Request for Proposal (RFP) and hire a provider of municipal electronic document management. Justification This would allow us to image documents for storage and sharing electronically for better internal and external communications. Depending on the service there also may be an annual cost. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 65,000 50,000 115,000 Total 65,000 50,000 115,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 65,000 50,000 115,000 Total 65,000 50,000 115,000 Page 74 Capital Improvement Plan t- "2 1!___ 1AT Project # GG -12 -001 Project Name City Hall/Public Works Building 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department General.Govemment Useful Life Unassigned Contact Asst City Manager Category Building Improvements Priority n/a. 1 mntion e funds will cover any changes /additions to file areas, workstations and record storage. Justification Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000 Total 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000. 35,000 175,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction, Fund 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175;000 Total 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000 Page 75 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# GG -12 -002 Project Name Assessing Department Equipment Replacement 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department General Government Useful Life Contact Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a lace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 15,000 30,000 45,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 15,000 2013 2014 30,000 2015 2016 45,000 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 15,000 30,000 45,000 Total 15,000 30,000 45,000 Page 76 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GG -12 -003 ProjectName IT Department Equipment Replacement . Type Unassigned Jseful Life Category Unassigned Department General Government Contact Priority n/a Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 25,000 105,600 43,700 27,900 20,000 222,200 Total 25,000 105,600 43,700 27,900 20,000 222,200 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 25;000 105,600 43,700 27,900 20,000 222,200 Total 25,000 105,600 43,700 27,900+„ 20,000 222,200 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 ihru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -001 Project Name Braemar: Maintenance Equipment Type Equipment Department Golf Course Useful Life Unassigned Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Routine equipment replacement purchases for mowers, and other smaller miscellaneous maintenance equipment. Justification These are routine equipment replacement purchases for mowers, and other miscellaneous maintenance equipment that are on a 10 -15 year replacement schedule. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 135,000 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 750,000 Total 135,000 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 750,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Golf Course Fund 135,000 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 750,000 Total 135,000 145,000 155,000 155,000 160,000 750,000 Page 78 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -002 Project Name Braemar: Miscellaneous Equipment 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Golf Course Useful Life 10 years Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a ton equipment replacement purchases for driving range equipment and small utility vehicles. Justification These are routine equipment replacement purchases for cushmans, ball pickers, and other small utility equipment that are on a 10 year replacement schedule. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 40,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 255,000 Total 40,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 255,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Golf Course Fund 40,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 255,000 Total 40,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 255,000 Page 79 l�.. «.4..1 T... «�..�...«.,. «4101— Project # GC -12 -003 Project Name Golf Dome: Structural Building Repair Type Improvement Department Golf Course Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Improvements Priority n/a sDescri tiba Make structural repairs and improve dome building Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 140,000 140,000 Total 140,000 140,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Unfunded 140,000 140;000 Total 140,000 140,000 i Page 80 M Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, NW,, Project a GC -12 -004 Project Name Braemar: Cart Paths and Tees 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Golf Course Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Golf Course Redevelopment Priority n/a Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Unfunded 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 r Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Projects► GC -12 -005 Project Name Driving Range Expansion Type Improvement Department Golf Course Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Golf Course Redevelopment Priority n/a Expenditures 2012 2013. 2014 .2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 550,000 550,000 TOW Funding Sources 2012 550,000 2013 2014 550,000 2015 2016 ° ` Total Unfunded 550,000 550,000 Total 550,000 550,000 Page 82 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 Project # GC -12 -006 Project Name Braemar: Carpeting Type Unassigned Department Golf Course Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Description Replace,carpeting in,pro shop and lower level Justification Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Unfunded 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 .. .............. Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -007 Project Name Braemar: Slit Drainage 3 Fairways 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Golf Course Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Golf Course Redevelopment Priority n/a Justification Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 110,000 110,000 Total 110,000 110,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Unfunded 110,000 110,000 Total 110,000 110,000 Page 84 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -008 Project Name Braemar: Clubhouse Roof Replacement Type Improvement Department Golf Course seful Life Contact . Park & Recreation Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Description Replace roof over the pro shop and clubhouse areas. Justification Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 80,000 80,000 160,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 80,000 2013 2014 80,000 2015 2016 160,000 Total Unfunded '80,000 80,000 160;000 Total 80,000 80,000 160,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -009 Project Name Braemar: Cart Paths 1 -9 Type Improvement Useful Life Category Golf Course Redevelopment Build cart paths for holes 1 -9 Justification 2012 thru 2016 Department Golf Course Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Unfunded 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 86 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # GC -12 -010 Project Name Braemar: Cart Paths 10 -18 Type Improvement Department Golf Course Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation — Category Golf Course Redevelopment Priority n/a Desori tion Build cart ,paths for holes 10 -18 Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Unfunded 100,000 100,000 Total. _ 100,000 100,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# HRA -11 -001 Project Name Promenade Phase IV Type Improvement Useful Life Category Unassigned Department HRA Contact City Manager Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 Construct Pedestrian Bridge over France Avenue at West 72nd Street and pathway to connect to the Promenade. Also provide pedestrian upgrades to the intersections along France Avenue. The proposed pedestrian bridge would be constructed in 2012 to 2013. The pedestrian upgrades would be improved in 2013. Justification This phase is for the pedestrian bridge over France Avenue to connect the neighborhoods west of France Avenue to the core of the Promenade and Centenial Lakes area. The intersections along France Avenue do not encourage pedestrian movement along the corridor; this project would enhance these crossings. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 3,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 Total 3,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Mn /DOT 1,000,000 1,000,000 Tax Increment Funds 2,000,000 1,000,000 3,000,000 Total 3,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 Page 88 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# HRA -11 -002 Project Name Promenade Phase III 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department HRA Useful Life Contact City Manager Category Unassigned Priority n/a Description Complete the westerly Promenade section south of Hazelton Road.: Justification The westerly section'of pathway was placed as a bituminous pathway until the properties to the west of the Promenade are redeveloped. The proposed concept plan include a stub to the west to connect to the pedestrian bridge. over France Avenue. The plan also includes a substantial water feature along this corridor. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total 2,000,000 2,000,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Tax Increment Funds 2,000,000 2,000,000 Total 2,000,000 . `` ; 2,000,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# HRA -11 -003 Project Name France Ave and TH62 Reconstruction Type Improvement Useful Life Category Unassigned Department HRA Contact City Manager Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 Reconstruct the France Avenue and TH62 Interchange. The first three years would involve traffic studies of the area from Valley View Road to Xerxes Avenue. This project will also require funding from Federal Highways, MNDOT, and / or Hennepin County. Justification The France Avenue and TH62 Interchange is one of the most congested interchanges in the Metropolitan Area. This congestion leads to many crashes at the intersections to the on ramps to TH62. This project would relieve the congestion at this interchange, therefore creating a safer access through France Avenue and to and from TH62. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 200,000 16,000,000 16,200,000 Total 200,000 16,000,000 16,200,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Mn/DOT 5,000,000 5,000,000 Tax Increment Funds 100,000 100,000 11,000,000 11,200,000 TOW 100,000 100,000 16,000,000 16,200,000 Page 90 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -02 -005 Project Name 50th: Store Remodel Type Improvement seful Life Unassigned Category Building Improvements Interior store remodel. Department Liquor Stores Contact Liquor Stores Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 Justification Store was last remodeled in 1998. Replace flooring, liquor shelving, reconfigure lighting. Add lighter color to interior. Expenditures - 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 Page 91 100,000 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -09 -002 Project Name York: Store Remodel - Type Improvement Department Liquor Stores Useful Life 15 years Contact Liquor Stores Category Building Improvements Priority n/a Mscri lion This will be a major interior remodel. Possible changes include realignment of shelving, changes to coolers, and enhanced security. Justification The York store was built in 1996 and.is due for a remodel., Redesign will better utilize space and improve traffic flow. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 .2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 300,000 300,000 TOW 300,000 300,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 300,000 300,000 Total 300,000 300,000 Page 92 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a LIQ -09 -003 Project Name 50th: Replace Entrance Door Type Improvement seful Life Category Building Maintenance Replace entrance doors. Department Liquor Stores Contact Liquor Stores Priority n/a Justification I Current doors were installed in 1998 and will need replacement. 2012 thru 2016 Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 .20,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -10 -003 Project Name York: Replace Entrance Door Type Improvement Department Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Description Replace entrance doors. Justification Current doors were installed in 1996 and will need replacement. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 25,000 25,000' Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 •2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 25,000 25,000 " Total 25,000 25,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -10 -004 Project Name York: Replace Rooftop HVAC Type Improvement Department Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a ion 2 rooftop HVAC units on the York store. 2012 thru 2016 Justification I Current HVAC units were installed in 1996 and need to be replaced. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 25,000 25,000 50,000 Total 25,000 25,000 50,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 25,000 25,000 50,000 Total 25,000 25,000 50,000 Page 95 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 'roject # LIQ -10 -005 'roject Name York: LED Signage Type Improvement Useful Life Category Building Improvements Replace current neon signage with LED. Department Liquor Stores Contact Liquor Stores Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 Justification Current signage needs updating. LED is more energy efficient than neon. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Page 96 Capital Improvement Plan City, of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -10 -006 Project Name Vernon: Replace Load Leveler Dock Type Improvement seful Life Category Building Maintenance Description Replace load leveler dock. Department Liquor Stores Contact Liquor Stores Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 Justification I Current load leveler dock was installed in 2002 and will need maintenance /repairs. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 15,000 15,000 TOW 15,000 15,000 r' Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 15,000 15,000 Total 15,000 15,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# LIQ -11 -001 Project Name All Stores: Repairs and Maintenance Type Improvement Useful Life Category Building Maintenance Repairs and maintenance. Justification Department Liquor Stores Contact Liquor Stores Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 35,000 60,000 25,000 120,000 TOW 35,000 60,000 25,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 35,000 60,000 25,000 120,000 Total 35,000 60,000 25,000 120,000 Page 98 Capital Improvement Plan City ofEdina, MN Project # LIQ -11 -002 Project Name 50th: LED Lights Type Equipment Department Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category ,Building Maintenance Priority n/a Description Install LED lights for the beer cooler at 50th St., Justification -- Increase energy efficiency. Payback is 2 to 4 years. 2012 thru 2016 Expenditures 2012' 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 10,000 10,000 Total 10,000 10,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund `` 10,000 10,000 Total 10,000 10,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# LIQ -11 -003 Project Name Vernon: LED Lights Type Equipment Department Liquor Stores Useful Life Contact Liquor Stores Category Building Maintenance Priority n/a Install LED lights for the beer cooler at Vernon. Justification I Increase energy efficiency. Payback is 2 to 4 years. 2012 thru 2016 Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles/Fumishings 10,000 10,000 Total 10,000 10,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 10,000 10,000 Total 10,000 10,000 Page 100 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ-11-004 Project Name All Stores: Video & Software Upgrades Type Equipment Department Liquor Stores Useful Lire Contdit, Liquor Stores Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a DescrilDtion Rre'pla66 video & POS hardware and software as needed. 2012 thru 2016 Justification I POS' oftware is out of date. Need to add video to system for better security. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicies/Fumishings 20,000 20,000 40,000 Total 20,000 20,000 40,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 20,000 20,000 40,000 Total 20,000 20,000 40,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # LIQ -11 -005 Project Name Vernon: Replace Rooftop HVAC Type Unassigned Useful Life Category Building Maintenance rooftop HVAC at Vernon store. Justification Unit has reached the end of its useful life. Department Liquor Stores Contact Liquor Stores Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equip/Vehicies /Furnishings 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Page 102 r Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN F ect a LIQ -11 -006 ect Name Vernon: Replace Entrance & Exit Doors Type Improvement Useful Life Category Building Maintenance Replace all 4 doors at the Vernon store. Department Liquor Stores Contact Liquor Stores Priority n/a Justification The doors are at the end of their useful life. 2012 thru 2016 Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construclion/Maintenance 30,000 30,000 TOW 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Liquor Fund 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Page 103 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project# PK -00 -033 Project Name Pamela Park: Renovate senior athletic field Type Improvement Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Unassigned Contact Park &Recreation Category Ballfield Improvements Priority n/a Description . Regrade the soccer field turf and provide new sand and peat mixture sub -soils and re- install the underground irrigation system. Justification This soccer field is in need of re-grading-for proper drainage purposes and to correct uneven turf conditions. The irrigation system is in keeping with the Turf Management Plan. which relies on proper irrigation and drainage to allow for reduced use of herbicides. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total. Construction /Maintenance 330,000 330,000 Total 330,000 330,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 330,000 330,000 Total 330,000 330,000 Page 104 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # . PK -07 -004 Project Name Pamela Park: New athletic field Type Improvement Useful Life - Category Unassigned Department Park & Recreation Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a on a new multi- purpose athletic field adjacent to the senior athletic field on the south end of Pamela Park. Justification There is more demand for multi - purpose athletic fields than there is supply. The same multi - purpose athletic fields are used to support the games of football, soccer, lacrosse, rugby and ultimate frisbee. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 400,000 400,000 Total 400,000 400,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 400,000 400,000 Total 400,000 400,000 Page 105 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -08 -006 Project Name Lewis Park: Pathway lighting 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a project would include decorative pathway lighting fixtures along the pathway at Lewis Park. Justification I The pathway around the perimeter of Lewis Park receives a tremendous amount of use on a year around basis. There are many elderly adults that enjoy walking on the pathway year around. During the late fall through early spring the park pathway receives a lot of use during hours of darkness. Pathway lighting would enhance safety and further promote walking on the pathway on a year around basis. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Page 106 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# PK -09 -005 Project Name Natural resources inventory assessment 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a A natural resources inventory assessment is intended to identify rare plant and animal species, and exotic non - native plant species assessment. The assessment can also include other important information such as soil types, existing infrastructures, and areas of significant historical and cultural values. Justification I A resource inventory assessment must first be conducted to identify Edina's prairies, woods and wetlands and produce a landscape comprehensive resource map. The survey is needed to assess ecological functions. Once a resource inventory assessment is completed, a Natural Resources Conservation and Management Plan will be established. At that time, natural resource management policies will be proposed and adopted. For example, exotic or invasive plants may be controlled to protect native habitats for the health and safety of the public. This is an important step in the process to ultimately identify a master landscape plantings plan for all Edina parks, which is the final phase of park development that has yet to be completed. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Planning /Design 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 107 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -10 -004 Project Name Countryside Park: Playground & Pathway 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a This calls for replacement of the existing Kompan (company brand name) creative play playground equipment at Countryside Park and placing new equipment in the west location as drawn on the new Countryside Park master plan. This project also includes significant grading work and development of a partial section of the pathway as proposed in the master plan. This would be consider Phase I of the master plan development. Justification The Countryside Park master plan calls for removal of the aged and outdated playground equipment and placing new more modern equipment in the southwest corner of the park. A portion of the pathway system including in the master plan would then be needed to create better access to the new playground location. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 330,000 330,000 TOW 330,000 330,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 330,000 330,000 Total 330,000 Page 108 330,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# PK -10 -005 Project Name Pamela Park: South Parking Lot Expansion 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a The project involves expansion of the parking lot on the south end of Pamela Park. The redesign will include striping of the parking lot to make more efficient use of existing parking. 20 -23 additional parking stalls are proposed to be added to the south parking lot. . Justification I On occasional evenings, there is not enough parking capacity to serve scheduled programs and as a result, park users are parking on the grass. The new additional small rectangular athletic field is also expected to require some additional parking capacity. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 40,000 40,000 Total 40,000 40,000 Page 109 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -10 -006 Project Name Pamela Park: North Parking Lot Expansion 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a is project proposes to improve the flow of traffic into the north parking lot (near the park shelter building), create ire parking capacity where possible and stripe the lot to make parking safer and more efficient. Justification I The existing north parking lot does not have well defined parking stalls, which leads to an inefficient and unsafe parking lot. As a result, park users park unlawfully on the grass. During high peak scheduled activities, there are not enough parking stalls to accommodate the demand. Additional parking stalls will make the lot safer, more efficient and keep park patrons from parking on neighborhood streets. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 45,000 45,000 Total 45,000 45,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 45,000 45,000 Total 45,000 45,000 Page 110 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PK -10 -007 Project Name Pamela Park: West Parking Lot Expansion 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a Park's west parking lot renovation includes removal of existing asphalt surface, developing a new sub -base, g a new wear- course of asphalt followed by a finish coat of asphalt and adding concrete curbing around the er. The plan calls for an expansion opportunity to add 37 more parking stalls to the west lot. Justification I The west parking lot will be in need of total renovation in 2013. Concrete curbing is needed to deter people from parking on the grass or driving through the park. Additional parking is needed to keep visitors from parking on the grass during peak use periods. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 60,000 60,000 TOW 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Page III Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 'roject # PK -11 -005 'roject Name Rosland Park: Pathway Renovation Type Improvement Useful Life Category Park Development 2012 thru 2016 . Department Park & Recreation Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a is a complete renovation of the asphalt walking path around Lake Cornelia within Rosland Park. The renovation include reclamation of existing asphalt and placement of new asphalt. Justification The asphalt pathway around Lake Cornelia has aged and worn beyond patch and repair and therefore requires a complete renovation which is safer and more cost effective than multiple patching and repairing. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 250,000 250,000 Total 250,000 250,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 250,000 250,000 Total 250,000 250,000 Page 112 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a PK -11 -006 Project Name Bredeson Park: Comfort Station Renovation 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Park Development Priority n/a This project calls for complete renovation of the plumbing system that serves the mens and womens restroom facilities at the Bredesen Park comfort station. The system will be redesigned which also involves relocating existing interior walls and underground piping. Justification The plumbing system including the sanitary sewer design at the Bredesen Park comfort station has long been in need of a new design that will eliminate the continual and frequent expensive repairs. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Page 113 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2012 thru 2016 Project a PK -11 -007 Project Name Normandale Park: Replace Warming House /Shelter Type Improvement Useful Life Category Park Development Department Park & Recreation Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a This project involves replacement of the Normandale Park warming house /shelter building with a more modem design similar to the concept at Weber Park and Cornelia School Park. Justification The Normandale Park shelter building was designed and built in the 1970's and no longer meets residents' needs and expectations. The community has expressed an interest in having a shelter building that is more user friendly for social gatherings and meeting spaces on a year around basis, similar to the newer shelter buildings at Weber Park and Cornelia School Park. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 650,000 650,000 Total 650,000 650,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 650,000 650,000 Total 650,000 650,000 Page 114 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # pK -12 -001 Project Name Parks Department Equipment Replacement 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Park & Recreation Useful Life Contact Park & Recreation Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. Justification I Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 367,500 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 646,080 Total 367,500 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 646,080 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 367,500 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255 646,080 TOW 367,500 20,000 83,000 42,325 133,255. 646,080 Page 115 I Capital Improvement Plan Project # PK -12 -002 Project Name VanValkenburg Park construction Type Improvement Useful Life Category Park Development 2012 thru 2016 Department Park & Recreation Contact Park & Recreation Priority n/a Description This project involves the'development of the Van Valkenburg Park playground area that was designed by Brauer and Associates with input from resident neighbors. The plan includes a small playground, park benches, a tennis court, a 1/2 size basketball court, walking path and landscaping. It is the area immediately next to the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard and Park Terrace (just east of the water tower). Justification After the completion of the homes and development along Interlachen Boulevard and Park Terrace, residents requested the development of city -owned park land to serve as a mini -park. The next closest playground for neighborhood children is Alden Park which is approximately 1/3 of a mile away from Van Valkenburg Park. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 600,000. 600,000 Total 600,000 600,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 600,000 600,000 Total 600,000 600,000 Page 116 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -11 -005 Project Name police to Community Software 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Computer Software Priority n/a Descriution P to C -or "Police to Community" software allows customers to report crime and research crime reports without the assistance of ,a police department employee-This module is available as an add -on to our current records management system. Justification I Many law enforcement agencies have now implemented on -line police reporting, systems that allow victims to complete and file their own low level crimer reports, search public records and file accident reports. These systems save our officers time, it saves administrative time and it provides convenience. Our records management system will be undergoing significant upgrades in 2011. By waiting until 2013, it will allow us time to become proficient with the Expenditures. 2012 2013 2014 .2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 24,000 24,000 Total 24,000 24,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 24,000 24,000 Total 24,000 24,000 Page 117 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -12 -001 Project Name Fire Department Equipment Replacement 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Fire Department Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 359,000 195,000 25,000 25,000 604,000 Total 359,000 195,000 25,000 25,000 604,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 359,000 195,000 25,000 25,000 604,000 Total 359,000 195,000 25,000 25,000 604,000 Page 118 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# PS -12 -002 Project Name Police Department Equipment Replacement 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a lace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. Justification I Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 624,809 38,000 824,345 258,925 192,034 1,938,113 Total 624,809 38,000 824,345 258,925 192,034 1,938,113 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014' 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 624,809 38,000 824,345 258,925 192,034 1,938,113 Total 624,809 38,000 824,345 258,925 192,034 1,938,113 Page 119 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2012 thru 2016 Project # PS -12 -003 Project Name Inspections Department Equipment Replacement Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Chief Building Official Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 15,000 15,000 Total 15,000 15,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 15,000 15,000 TOW 15,000 15,000 Page 120 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -12 -004 Project Name Health Department Equipment Replacement Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life 10 years Contact Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Descri "tion Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. The current vehicle was purchased in 2002 and is due for replacement. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 16,500. 16,500 Total 16,500 16,500 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 16,500 16,500 Total 16,500 16,500 Page 121 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 'roject # PS -12 -005 'roject Name PD Transcription Software Type Equipment Useful Life Category Computer Software enterprise transcription software. 2012 thru 2016 Department Public Safety Contact Police Department Priority n/a Justification The department has been struggling with malfunctions and repairs with our current Olympus transcription program for 4 to 5 years. We handle approximately 2000 digital files a year (not including ICOP DVD's, 911 calls, etc.) with the need for transcription, duplication and long term storage for approximately 1500 cases for evidence purposes. Our current program is not be able to handle storage of squad videos (ICOP) or other special files and we continue to look for ways to handle other digital files needs for statements, squad videos, surveillance videos, etc. that would be more efficient and less costly. Having several individual separate programs for each type of media is not the most efficient or cost effective direction for us to continue. interfacing all of our digital dictation storage and transcription needs within one program would make it more Figeable and productive which will enhance employee effectiveness and efficiency. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 13,000 13,000 Total 13,000 13,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 13,000 13,000 Total 13,000 13,000 Page 122 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # pS -12 -006 Project Name PD Ballistic Vests Type Equipment Department Public Safety . Useful Life Contact Police Department: Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Description The ballistics vests that our SWAT team issues are a much more protective vest than the "typical" patrol officer ballistic vest. The original vests were purchased in 2004 after a private party granted the money necessary to the 'Edina Crime Fund., Justification The vests protective warranty expired in 2009. This was a significant concern after one of our narcotics officers was involved in SWAT entry in which 100's of rounds of semi - automatic gun fire were fired by a.suspect. We place these officers in the most dangerous situations and do not currently provide proper safety gear. Our vests are not funded in equipment replacement and are in urgent need of replacement in order to keep these specially trained officers safe. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015' 2016 Total _EquipNehicles /Furnishings 34,300 34,300 Total 34,300 34,300 l Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 34,300 34,300 Total 34,300. 34,300.' Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# PS -12 -007 Project Name PD Alarm Billing Software 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Computer Software Priority n/a ;riDtion automated alarm tracking and billing program. the year 2013, the Capital Plan has a department wide computer upgrade which intended to make our records more cessible to the public. We would also like to add an additional upgrade from OSSI, who is the software vendor for r department computer system. They offer a software program named "Cry Wolf' that would be integrated into our mputer aided dispatch and records management system to provide automated tracking and billing for false alarms sed on the initial call for service. We currently use an Access (software) based system that requires manual entry of alarm call. It is a dated system that has required several maintenance calls to the software writer to correct glitches. e average over 2400 alarm calls Der year. Justification The benefits of the new software would be less officer time on paperwork on alarm calls, no redundant entry by support staff and more accurate billing. We do not know how many alarm billings are missed each year due to human error. The greatest benefit would be the time savings for the officers and support staff. The support staff time could be better used to relieve the officers of routine paperwork. The overall goal is to keep the officers on the street as much as possible. The initial purchase price is $41,000 with and annual maintenance /licensing fee of $6,050. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 41,040 41,040 Total 41,040 41,040 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 41,040 41,040 Total 41,040 41,040 Page 124 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -12 -008 Project Name PD License Plate Reader Type Equipment Useful'Life Category Computer Software 2012 thru 2016 Department Public Safety Contact Police Department - Priority n/a Description' escri tion . LPR (License Plate Recognition) is an image-processing technology, used to identify vehicles by their, license plates. This technology is used in various security and traffic applications. It is available to add on to our current in -car video system. The camera finds and initiates license plate checks without the officer taking their eyes of the road and hands off the steering wheel. Justification The LPR systems significant advantage is that the system can keep an image record of the. vehicle which is useful in order to fight crime and fraud. This is innovative technology that would assist,the police department in locating stolen vehicles, vehicles wanted in other crimes, persons with warrants, and non -valid drivers. It's like having a second officer in the car to complete the computer work needed to run license plates in the computer. Expenditures . 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 20,000 20,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 ,.•., 20,000 2013 2014 2015 20,000 2016 Total Construction Fund 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -12 -009 Project Name PD Radio Equipment 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a replacement of 800 MHZ portable and mobile radios. Justification Phased replacement of portable and mobile radios is scheduled to begin in 2014 and this figure represents one -fourth of our fleet. Our equipment is still current and not significantly different than the newest model; however, the radios will require more service as they age. Portable replacement should be a higher priority due to the wear and tear they receive. Base station radio equipment is not scheduled for replacement until 2019, which is no longer a realistic date to extend this equipment. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Page 126 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Projects/ PS -12 -010 Project Name PD Security Cameras 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a lding surveillance security camera replacement Justification Although our current system is not scheduled for replacement until 2019, the cameras have a significant failure rate and are requiring frequent service. Transitioning to an 1P -based CCTV system will provide us with more functionality and allow us to take advantage of the Public Works installation. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 Page 127 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -12 -011 Project Name FD Chest Compression Devices 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Fire Department Category Fire Priority n/a Two Lucas Chest Compression Devices used in cardiac arrest. Justification Chest Compression Devices are becoming a standard of care for EMS providers. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 28,500 28,500 Total 28,500 28,500 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 28,500 28,500 Total 28,500 28,500 Page 128 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PS -12 -012 Project Name PD Dispatch Phone System 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a [On the digital phone logger system used in dispatch. This equipment records and stores 911 calls, radio traffic and ;rgency calls. We are mandated to record and retain 911 calls. Justification The current system is several years old and has experienced key component failures. This project can be paid for with E911 funds. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total PD Special Revenue Fund 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Page 129 Project # PS -12 -013. Project Name PD In -Squad Video System 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department Public Safety Useful Life Contact Police Department Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Desk criution Replace the in -squad camera system. The video system that we have replaces the ANff Wradio in the cars. , The units are auto manufacturer specific, meaning that the units fit, in a Ford or Chevy, but not both. Justification We made th'e'purchase of our video system before Ford announced they were `no longer going to sell the police model Crown Victoria. In response.to that news,'our provider (ICOP) was designing a "fix" so that the Ford video units would fit in Chevy cars. However, the company went out of business prior to that adapter design being finished. The company that nowaervices ICOP is not pursuing the work that ICOP had intended to complete. Thus, when we convert to the Chevy model .police car in 2013, we will need anew video system. This project can' be paid for with forfeiture funds. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 .2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 90,000. 90,000 Total 90,000. 90,000 Funding Sources 201.2 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total PD Special Revenue Fund 90,000 90,000 Total 90,000 90,000 Page 130 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2012 thru 2016 Project a PW -00 -074 Project Name Concrete Rehab: Parklawn Ave. (France to W 77) Type Improvement Useful Life Unassigned Category Municipal State Aid existing concrete roadway. Department Public Works Contact Public Works Priority n/a Justification This roadway is over 30 years old and is in need of concrete repair. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 450,000 450,000 TOW 450,000 450,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Municipal State Aid 360,000 360,000 Public Improvement Revolving 90,000 90,000 Total 450,000 450,000 Page 131 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# PW -01 -011 Project Name Reconstruct: W 62nd St. ( Oaklawn -France) Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life Unassigned Contact Engineering Category Municipal State Aid Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 This project provides for the reconstruction of West 62nd Street from Oaklawn Avenue to France Avenue. This project will provide a new roadway section and will bring this road into compliance with State -Aid Standards. Sidewalks will also be proposed with this reconstruction. Justification I This project was initiated by the Pavement Management System due to the roadway pavement reaching a point of failure. Maintenance of the roadway such as overlays or seal -coats are no longer feasible. The roadway section is also considered inadequate per the Municipal State -Aid Standards as set by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 520,000 520,000 TOW 520,000 520,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Municipal State Aid 416,000 416,000 Public Improvement Revolving 104,000 104,000 Total Page 132 520,000 520,000 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # pW -01 -012 Proje\ Name. Reconstruct: W 54th St. (Wooddale to France) type improvement, urpnrtulcut ruuuc Wu— Useful Life Unassigned Contact Engineering Category Municipal State Aid Priority n/a This project provides for the reconstruction of West 54th Street.from Wooddale Avenue to France Avenue. This project will provide a new roadway section and will bring this road into compliance with State -Aid Standards. Sidewalks will also be analyzed with this reconstruction. Justification This project was initiated by.the Pavement Management System due to the roadway pavement reaching a point of failure. Maintenance of the roadway such as overlays or seal -coats are no longer feasible.. The roadway section is also considered inadequate per the Municipal State -Aid Standards as set by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 850,000 850,000 Total 850,000 850,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Municipal State Aid 680,000 680,000 Public Improvement Revolving 170,000 170,000 Total 850,000 850,000 Page 133 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2012 thru 2016 Project # PW -02 -006 Project Name Public Works: Braemar Cold Storage: Improvements Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life Unassigned Contact Public Works Coordinator Category Building Improvements Priority n/a Complete construction of concrete floor at Braemar Public Works Cold Storage Building. Justification The Braemar Public Works Cold Storage Building was constructed in 1998 -99 to store off - season equipment for both Public Works and Park Maintenance. Public Works staff has placed concrete on the center drive isle to reduce dust through the building. The remaining storage areas are also in need of a hard surface floor. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 40,000 40,000 80,000 Total 40,000 40,000 80,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 40,000 40,000 80,000 Total 40,000 40,000 80,000 Page 134 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # PW -03 -005 Project Name Reconstruct: W 58th St (France to Xerxes) Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life Unassigned Contact Engineering Category., Municipal State Aid Priority n/a Description This project provides for the reconstruction of West 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. This project will provide a new roadway section and will bring this road into compliance with State - Aid - Standards. Sidewalks will also be analyzed with.this reconstruction. Justification This project.was initiated. by the Pavement Management System due to the roadway pavement reaching a point of failure. Maintenance of the roadway such as overlays or seal -coats are no longer feasible. The roadway section is also considered inadequate per the Municipal State -Aid Standards as set by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total. Construction /Maintenance 629,000 629,000 Total 629,000. 629,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total MunicipaiState Aid 503,200 503,200 Public Improvement Revolving 125,800 125,800 Total 629,000 629,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PW -04 -001 Project Name Reconstruct: W 58th St ( Wooddale to France) Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life Unassigned Contact Engineering Category Municipal State Aid Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 This project provides for the reconstruction of West 58th Street from Wooddale Avenue to France Avenue. This project will provide a new roadway section and will bring this road into compliance with State -Aid Standards. Sidewalks will also be analyzed with this reconstruction. Justification This project was initiated by the Pavement Management System due to the roadway pavement reaching a point of failure. Maintenance of the roadway such as overlays or seal -coats are no longer feasible. The roadway section is also considered inadequate per the Municipal State -Aid Standards as set by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 900,000 900,000 Total 900,000 900,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Municipal State Aid 720,000 720,000 Public Improvement Revolving 180,000 180,000 TOW 900,000 900,000 Page 136 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru . 2016 City of Edina, MN Projects ;PW -05 -003 Project Name Bridge: 54th_.Street Bridge Type Improyement Department Public Works Useful Life 100 years Contact Engineering Category Municipal State Aid Priority n/a Descri tioh. This proj64;provide's for reconstructing this bridge and abutments and adding sidewalks over the Minnehaha Creek. Justification The need t6rehabilitate this bridge was determined by the annual bridge certification program. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 520,000. 520,000 Total 520,000 520,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Municipal State Aid 520,000 520,000 TOW 520,000 520,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # Pw -05 -006 Project Name Mill & Overlay: Olinger Blvd (Vernon -Tracy) Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Engineering Category Municipal State Aid Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 This project involves the milling of distressed surface and the repaving of a new surface on Olinger Boulevard from Vernon Avenue to Tracy Avenue. Justification The need to rehabilitate this segment of roadway was determined by the Pavement Management System. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 275,000 275,000 Total 275,000 275,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Municipal State Aid 275,000 275,000 Total 275,000 275,000 Page 138 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PW -08 -004 Project Name Braemar Cold Storage- Fire Suppression Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Building Improvements Priority n/a ion a fire protection for the Braemar Cold Storage Building. 2012 thru 2016 Justification This building is approximately 17,000 SF and stores off - season public works and park maintenance equipment. The building is not fire protected. This will provide a fire protection system in case of fire within the building. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 70,000 70,000 Total Funding Sources 70,000 2012 2013 70,000 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000 70,000 Page 139 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 3roject # pw -08 -005 'roject Name Skid Steer Type Equipment Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 This is a skid steer loader for the street department to be used in the concrete pavement rahbilitation program. Justification I This skid steer will be used to remove pavement within the street department when repairing concrete roadways in the City. Staff can work more efficiently with an additional skid steer. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equip/Vehicles /Furnishings 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Page 140 Capital. Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN F ect # Pw -11 -005 ect Name Centennial Lakes Bridge Painting Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life 20 years Contact Public Works Category Unassigned Priority 3Important Description, 2012 thru 2016 Paint the bridges and railings on two bridges. One on 76th Street and the other on Parklawn Ave both over Centennial Lake. Justification The bridge paint is faded and showing rust. The rust will distroy the bridges if not removed and painted. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 70,000 70,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 70,000 2015 2016 70,000 Total Construction Fund 70,000 70,000 Total 70,000. 70;000 Page 141 J Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project# PW =11 -006 Project Name GPS Electrical System Type Unassigned Department Public Works Useful Life. Contact Public'Works Category Local Streets Priority n/a Description GPS..City's street lights and electrical services for City, owned buildings and other facilities. Justification GPS will allow the City to map these facilities in order to locate underground wires. and record maintenance of the facility.; Expenditures 2012 2013 2014, 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 30,000 30;000 Total Funding Sources 2012. 2013 30,000 2014 2015 2016 30,000 Total Construction Fund. 30,000 " 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a Pw -12 -001 Project Name Neighborhood Street Recon Program Type Improvement Useful Life 50 years Category Local Streets Department Public Works Contact Public Works Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 s project will provide for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of various local streets throughout the City in a cost active manner. Justification I The need to reconstruct these streets are initiated by the recommendations of Staff. These recommendations are based on condition and age of pavement, and also ratings compared with other local neighborhoods. The potential future roadway reconstruction projects are: 2012: Richmond Hills Park, Countryside, Viking Hills, Valley Estates, 2013: Mendelssohn A, Notmandale, Braemar Hills B & C, Lake Edina A & B 2014: Walnut Ridge, Edina Highlands Lakeside, Harriet Manor A & B, Holands, Hyde Park 2015: Glen View Addition, Edina Bel -Air 2016: Morningside, Birchcrest Addition, Dewey Hill B & C & D, Glasgow Drive Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 4,015,000 4,425,000 4,120,000 4,620,000 3,580,000 20,760,000 TOW 4,015,000 4,425,000 4,120,000 4,620,000 3,580,000 20,760,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Public Improvement Revolving 4,015,000 4,425,000 4,120,000 4,620,000 3,580,000 20,760,000 TOW 4,015,000 4,425,000 4,120,000 4,620,000 3,580,000 20,760,000 Page 143 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PW -12 -002 Project Name Sidewalks/Pathways (MSA) Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life Unassigned Contact Public Works Category Municipal State Aid Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 Construct sidewalks along MSAS designated streets as petitioned from residents. Justification I These projects will provide separation of pedestrians and vehicles along the designated routes. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Municipal State Aid 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 TOM 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Page 144 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PW -12 -003 Project Name Sidewalks/Pathways: City Costs Type Improvement Department Public Works Useful Life Unassigned Contact Public Works Category Sidewalk - Pathways Priority n/a 2012 thru 2016 projects will provide separation of pedestrians and vehicles along the designated routes. Justification These projects are initiated by petitions from residents only. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 TOW 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Page 145 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # PW -12 -004 Project Name Public Works Equipment Replacement 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Equipment Replacement Priority n/a Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 345,000 ' 125,000 55,000 45,000 480,000 1,050,000 Total 345,000 125,000 55,000 45,000 480,000 1,050,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 345,000 125,000 55,000 45,000 480,000 1,050,000 Total 345,000 125,000 55,000 45,000 480,000 1,050,000 Page 146 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project`# PW -12 -005 Project Name PW Fuel Canopy Type Unassigned Department Public Works Useful Life Contact Category Unassigned Priority n/a Description Install canopy over fuel island at the new Public Works and Park J ace Facility Justification The fuel island was installed without a canopy due to budgetary restraints and also the requirement of a variance. The variance is needed due to the location of the canopy from the property line. After utilizing the fuel island for one year and through the winter months, staff realizes that a canopy is needed to help protect the fuel pumps from the weather. Expenditures 2012 2013', 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 .Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 • Total Construction Fund 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # Pw -12 -007 Project Name Vehical Management Software Upgrade Type Unassigned Department Public Works Useful Life 15 years Contact Public Works Category Unassigned Priority n/a Update the existing vehical maintenance management software 2012 thru 2016 Justification To utilize the software's full capacity and better manage the City's fleet. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 25,000 25,000 Total 25,000 25,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 25,000 25,000 TOW 25,000 25,000 Page 148 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -03 -012 Project Name 1998 Cat Backhoe Replacement Type Equipment Useful Life 15 years Category Utility Equipment Replacement Backhoe replacement 2012 thru 2016 Department Utility Department Contact Utility Supt. Priority n/a Justification This backhoe will be 15+ years old and at the end of its life expectancy Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 170,000 170,000 Total 170,000 170,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 170,000 170,000 Total 170,000 170,000 Page 149 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2012 thru 2016 Project # UT -04 -005 Project Name Public Works: Braemar Work Site -Lead Removal Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life Unassigned Contact Utility Supt Category Water Main System Priority n/a existing stabilized lead contaminated soil located at Braemar Public Works Site. Justification The lead abatement project for the Brian Wipperman Gun Range left approximately 2000 cubic yards of stabilized lead soil at this location. The construction of the Braemar Public Safety Training Facility has drastically reduced the amount of space needed for the Public Works and Parks maintenance operation. This soil removal will free -up approximately 15,000 square feet of working area. This area is used for sorting soils and debris from watermain breaks, construction projects, leaf storage, etc. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Page 150 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN F oject # UT -05 -010 oject Name Lift Station #8 (4023 Monterey Ave) Type Improvement Useful Life 30 years Category Lift Stations 2012 thru 2016 Department Utility Department Contact Utility Supt. Priority 2 Very Important 7i tion Lb Lift Station including new pumps. The other option that we may have is to elliminate the lift station and install a gravity line to lift station #2. Justification Expenditures ' 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 200,000 200,000 Total Funding Sources Utility Funds - San Swr 200,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 200,000 200,000 2016 Total 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Page 151 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -07 -002 Project Name New Water Treatment Plant ( #5) Type Improvement Useful Life 50 years Category Filter Plants 2012 thru 2016 Department Utility Department Contact Utility Supt.. Priority 2 Very Important Description An additional 2000 gallon per minute iron removal filter plant to be built near the Southdale water tower. Justification Improve water quality and remove radium in wells 45 and 18. With out this filter plant well #.18 may become unusable. Costs for this project includes land acquisition costs. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 1,600,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 7,600,000 TOW 1,600,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 7,600,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtrr 1,600,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 7,600,000 Total 1,600,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 7,600,000 Page 152 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# UT -07 -003 Project Name New Water Treatment Plant ( #6) 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department:, Utility Department Useful Life 50 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Filter Plants Priority 2 Very Important DescriDtion This is year three for this expense; the previous years had $3,500,000 budgeted for the new treatment plan., New 3000 gallon per minute water treatment plant to treat wells #2, 7,15 and well #9. Justification Improve water quality.and regain the pumping capacity of well #9 and V. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total, Construction /Maintenance 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total 3,000,000 3,000,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total 3,000,000 3,000,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a UT -07 -008 Project Name Sewer Jetter Replacement 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Utility Department Useful Life 20 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Utility Equipment Replacement Priority 3 Important Replace the 1992 Sanitary Sewer Jetter with a new Jet/Vacuum Unit Justification I This unit has reached it's useful life. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehiclestFurnishings 350,000 350,000 Total 350,000 350,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 350,000 350,000 Total 350,000 350,000 Page 154 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# UT -08 -008 Project Name piping Wells #5 and #18 to WTP #5 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life 100 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Water Main System Priority 2 Very Important ling water main from wells #5 and #18 to be treated at WTP #5. Justification Improving water quality from wells #5 and #18 for the Southdale area. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 100,000 2013 2014 2015 100,000 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 155 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -08 -009 Project Name well #5 (West 69th Street) 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Utility Department Useful Life 15 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Wells Priority 2 Very Important With the construction of WTP #5 well #5 will be converted to a submersible well and the building will be torn down. Justification Electrical equipment will be moved to WTP #5 and the ugly building on the median can be torn down. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 100,000 2013 2014 100,000 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 156 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, NW Project # UT -08 =014 Project Name Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining Project Type Unassigned Department Utility Department Useful Life Contact Engineering . Category Sanitary Sewer Improvements Priority n/a Description' This project will provide'aa alining to.the aging trunk sanitary sewer pipes. These pipes are generally located along Minnehaha Creek and also along Nine Mile Creek. A feasibility study to will be be completed the first year to assist the development of the final plans and specifications. Justification The majority of the trunk sanitary sewer pipes are adjacent to low lying areas or creeks. Some of these lines are known for infiltration of clear water into the sanitary sewer system. The lining will prohibit clear water from entering the system. The Metropolitan Council either has completed or will shortly be completing lining / rehabiliation of their system which the City of Edina's flows into. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 60,000 540,000 600,000 1,200,000 Total 60,000 540,000 600,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 60,000 540,000 600,000 1,200,000 Total 60,000 540,000. 600,000 1,200,000.. Page 157 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -09 -006 Project ]Name SCADA Upgrades 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life 15 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Utility Equipment Replacement Priority 2 Very Important ption improvement and add additional information to the system that wasn't included in the system. Justification Reduces time and operating cost of the Utility system. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Page 158 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City of Edina, NM Project # UT -09 -009 Project Name Well #12 Rehab Project ,Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life 6 years Contact Utility' Supt. Category Wells Priority 2 Very Important Description . Well rehab'for well #12 on a 7 year program. Justification After 7 years the pump for this well is worn out. Repair or replace well pump, remove sand from well hole, and make other needed repairs. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenanee 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wlr ` 120,000 120,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN [PrI001ject ect # UT -09 -010 Name Well # 2 Rehab Project 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life 6 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Wells Priority 2 Very Important Repair or replace well pump, remove sand from well hole, and make other repairs needed. Justification Improve water production. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Page 160 Capital Improvement .Plan City of Edina, MN P roject # UT -10 -006 roject Name Water Meter Replacement Project Type Equipment Department Utility Department seful Life, 20 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Utility Equipment Replacement Priority l,Urgent Description ' Replace residential water meters to match the new meter reading system. Old meter are in need of replacement because of there age. They are worn out. Justification Maintain a high level of billing accuracy for both the customers and the City. This will also help with balancing water pumped and water sold, which is typically referred to as lost water. Expenditures EquipNehicles /Furnishings 2012 240,000 2013 240,000 2014 240,000 2015 240,000 2016 240,000 Total 1,200,000 Total 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015. 2016 Total Utility Funds -1Ntr 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 1,200,000 Total 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 1,200,000 Page 161 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 'roject # UT -10 -008 'roject Name Well #9 Rehab Project Type Improvement Useful Life 15 years Category Wells 2012 thru 2016 Department Utility Department Contact Utility Supt. Priority 2 Very Important Rehab well #9 with new electrical and mechanical equipment, building modifacations and new motor. Justification Reduce operating costs Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 150,000 150,000 TOW 150,000 150,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 150,000 150,000 Total 150,000 150,000 Page 162 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -10 -009 Project Name Well # 11 Rehab Project 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Utility Department Jseful Life 6 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Wells Priority ' 1 Urgent LoS�rrpuvu � Rehab well #11 with new electrical an& mechanical equipment and new motor. Wells that run year round need to be rehabed every 7 years. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Mr 120,000 120,000 Total 120,000 120,000 Page 163 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -10 -010 Project Name Manhole Repair Project Type Improvement' Department Utility . Department Useful Life, 30 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Sanitary Sewer Improvements Priority.. 2 Very Important criAtion air the sanitary sewer manholes that were found to be defective during the 2007 and 08 inspection project. Justification Reduce inflow and infiltration in the sanitary sewer system as required by the MCES and make repair. that could cause failures in the City's sanitary sewer system. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 TOW 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Funding Sources 2012 1013 2014 .2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Sari Swr 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 Total 80,000 801000 80,060 240,00:0 Page 164 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -10 -011 Project Name W 69th Street and York Ave Water Main Loop 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life 100 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Water Main System Priority 2 Very Important Description Complete the water main loop from behind the new West 69th Street apartments. Justification The looped water system will provide redundancy in the system, while also providing better fire flows and water quality. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 110,000 110,000 Total 110,000 110,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015- 2016 Total Utility Funds - Mr 110,000 110,000 Total . 110,000 110,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN. . Project # UT -11 -004 Project Name pond & Lake Dredging Type Improvement Useful Life 30 years Category Storm Sewer Improvements 2012 thru 2016 Department Utility Department Contact Utility Supt Priority 3Important I Description Dredge ponds as necessary. The first major project is anticipated to take place in 2013. An update to the surface water management plan will identify the pond, or lake that will be brought forward. for dredging.. The delay in start date is due to the extensive permitting involved with projects like this. Justification . These projects-'are necessary due to the aging of the City's ponds and lakes. This process involves the lakes filling in from sediment into the system and natural life of organic material. Total 60,000 11100,000 Page 166 60,000 120,000 1,340,000 Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction/Maintenance 60,000 1,100,000 60,000 120,000 1,340,000 TOW 60,000 1,100,000 60,000 120,000 1,340,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Stm Swr 60,000 1;100,000 60,000. 120,000 1,340,000 Total 60,000 11100,000 Page 166 60,000 120,000 1,340,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -11 -005 Project Name Annual Vehicle Replacements 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Utility Department Useful Life 10 years Contact Utility Supt Category Utility Equipment Replacement Priority 3 Important of small vehicles and equipment that are 10 years old or 100,000 miles. Justification Vehicles have reached their life expectancy. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 70,000 75,000 50,000 195,000 Total 70,000 75,000 50,000 195,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 70,000 50,000 120,000 Utility Funds - Wtr 75,000 75,000 TOW 70,000 75,000 50,000 195,000 Page 167 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -11 -006 Project Name well #10 Rehab Project Type Improvement Useful Life 6 years Category Wells 2012 thru 2016 Department Utility Department Contact Utility Supt. Priority 2 Very Important well pump, motor, and any other warn equipment after 7 years of service. Justification Maintain well and other equipment to provide water supply requirements for the next seven years. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 100,000 100,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 100,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 100,000 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 168 Capital Improvement Plan 2012 rhru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project# UT -11 -007 Project Name Storm Water Lift Station #3 Rehab Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life 30 years' Contact Utility Supt. Category Storm Sewer Improvements Priority 2 Very Important Description Upgrade the Melody Lake Lift Station with new electrictcal equipment and controles, new pumps, and other changes. . Justification This station currently has a high operating cost and old equipment that needs replacement. Expenditures 2012 Equip/Vehicles /Furnishings 2013 2014 2015 200,000 2016, Total 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Stm Swr 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000 200,000 Page 169 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -11 -008 Project Name Sewer Camera and Cable Reel 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Utility Department Useful Life 15 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Sanitary Sewer Improvements Priority 2 Very Important Larger TV camera and cable reel to be installed in Sewer Televising Truck. Justification I Larger camera is used for televising larger Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer mains. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Page 170 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project N UT -12 -001 Project Name water Main Improvements 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life Unassigned Contact Utility Supt Category Water Main System . Priority n/a Descrivdon Update water system "when constructing neighborhood streets. See Project No. PW =11 -001 for potential neighborhoods. M U tification The majority of the existing water system consists of unlined cast iron pipes. These pipes are more susceptible to failure than a lined ductile iron pipe or a pvc type pipe. The newer lined ductile iron pipes or pvc pipes will provide better water quality and water pressure. Expenditures 2012 2013.,. 2014 2015 2016 Total Cbnstruction /Maintenance 925,000 828,000 805,000 1,104,000 726,000 4,388,000 TOW 925,000 826,000 805,000 1,104,000 726,000 4,388,000 Funding Sources Utility Funds - M ';.' .. 2012 925,000 2013 '828,000 2014 805,000. 2015 1,104,000 2016 726,000 Total 4,388,000 Total 925,000 828,000 805,000 1,104,000 726,000 4,388,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project# UT -12 -002 Project Name Sanitary Sewer Main Improvements 2012 thru 2016 Type Improvement Department Utility Department Useful Life 100 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Sanitary Sewer Improvements Priority 1 Urgent The repair and replacement of sanitary sewer mains in the street reconstruction projects Justification Most of the sanitary sewer system consists of clay pipe that was installed up to the 1970's. This type of pipe is more prone to failure than the current poly - vinyl- chloride and concrete pipes. The clay pipe is also typically more susceptible to root intrusion, which decreases the capacity of a pipe. The upgrade to the sanitary sewer system will help reduce inflow and infiltration into the system due to deteriorating sanitary manholes, leaking joints in pipes, and leaking covers. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 790,000 722,000 690,000 931,000 635,000 3,768,000 Total Funding Sources 790,000 2012 722,000 2013 690,000 2014 931,000 2015 635,000 2016 3,768,000 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 790,000 722,000 690,000 931,000 635,000 3,768,000 Total 790,000 722,000 690,000 931,000 635,000 3,768,000 Page 172 "Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2012 thru 2016 Project # UT -12 -003 Project Name Storm Sewer - Pipe and Grading Improvements Tvoe Imurovement Department Utility Department Useful Life Unassigned Contact Engineering Category Storm Sewer Improvements Priority n/a Descriution Provide replacement storm sewer for aging.system. This also includes new drain tiles for roof drains and sump pump discharges. Justification As roadways are reconstructed within the City storm sewers will require updating. See Project No. PW -11 -001 for potential neighborhoods. Drainage swales also need to be regraded. Drain tiles where needed should also be included with these projects. In 1998 the City undertook a sump pump inspection program that included inspections of all properties in the City to eliminate any clear water connections into the City's sanitary sewer system. The program identified all homes in the City that have sump pumps and other easement water problems. These new storm sewer improvements will provide a lace for clear water discharges especially during the winter months. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 1,755,000 1,331,000 1,250,000 1,440,000 1,130,000 6,906,000 Total Funding Sources 1,755,000 2012 1,331,000 2013 1,250,000 2014 1,440,000 2015 1,130,000 2016 6,906,000 Total Utility_ Funds,- Stm Swr 1,755,000 1,331,000 1,250,000 1;440,000 1,130,000 6,906,000 TOW 1,755,000 1,331,000 1,250,000 1,440,000 1,130,000 6, 906,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project # UT -12 -004 Project Name Pw Generator 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department Utility Department Useful Life Contact Category Unassigned Priority n/a ide a generator at the new Public Works Building to provide electrical power for the Xcel Peak Control events and during power outages. Justification I The Public Works and Park Maitenance Facility houses many emergency response equipment such as the tree truck, sanitary and storm sewer equipment, water main repair equipment, computer servers for the backup to City Hall and for the SCADA system, and fleet services that service the public safety equipment. These operations need to be able to access the facility twenty -four hours a day. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Equipment Replacement Progr 25,000 25,000 Utility Funds - Wtr 75,000 75,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Page 174 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Project a UT -12 -005 Project Name 30 Kw Generator 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department Utility Department Useful Life Contact Category Unassigned Priority n/a Provide an onsite power genderator for Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 21 located at 5970 Walnut Drive. Justification This lift station has experience numerous power outages or partial loss of power, which the pumps will not run when this occurs. The lift station will backup into the lower level of an adjacent apartment building when this occurs. An onsite generator would provide the redundancy that Xcel Energy cannot currently provide. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000 Page 175 i Capital Improvement Plan 2012 thru 2016 City of Edina, MN Project # UT -12 -006 Project Name Well NO 8 Type Unassigned Department Utility Department Useful Life Contact Category Unassigned Priority n/a Description Replace siding, roof,and soffits and fascia on the entire building. Justification These items are old and worn.out'with some. damage to them. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 35,000 35,000 Total Funding Sources 2012 35,000 2013 2014 35,000 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Wtr 35,000 35,000 Total 35,000 35,000 . Page 176, Capital Improvement Plan Project # UT -12 -007 Project Name SCADA Radio System Upgrade 2012 thru 2016 Type Unassigned Department Utility Department Useful Life 30 years Contact Utility Supt. Category Unassigned Priority n/a )estriDtion .eplace all radios on the Gleason Tower leg of the SCADA system. Justification These older radios are out dated and some of them are not repairable. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Fumishings 60,000 60,000 Total 60,000 60,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 20,000 20,000 Utility Funds - Stm Swr 20,000 20,000 Utility Funds - Wtr 20,000 20,000 Total 60,000` 60,000 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 'roject# UT -12 -008 'roject Name Cityworks Assett Management Update 2012 thru 2016 Type Equipment Department Utility Department Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Water Main System Priority n/a Upgrade the asset management system computer software to be more interactive with the public and mobile for City staff. Justification The current asset management computer software system contains information on all infrastrucure assets such as the sanitary sewer system, storm sewer system, water system, traffic signs, street lights, etc. Staff can perform basic functions such as keeping track of the assets, request for service and work orders. The public will be able to report an issue via their smart phone and the issue will be recorded directly into the system. City staff will then be able to receive service requests and create work orders in the field via internet over smart phones or laptops, which will reduce the trips back to the maintenance facility. These upgrades will also allow for consolidation of software systems that we currently use to issue permits and track costs as well as not requiring data entry staff. Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total EquipNehicles /Furnishings 62,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 287,000 Total 62,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 297,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - San Swr 21,000 25,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 96,000 Utility Funds - Stm Swr 20,000 25,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 95,000 Utility Funds - Wtr 21,000 25,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 96,000 Told 62,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 287,000 Page 178 City of Edina, MN F ect # UT -12 -009 ect Name Cooper Circle Pond Outlet Type Unassigned Department Utility Department Useful Life Contact Public Works Category Storm Sewer Improvements Priority n/a Description . Provide a storm, sewer outlet to Cooper Ciicle Pond. Justification This would provide a storm sewer outlet to a landlocked pond. Staff currently pumps the pond during periods of high water, which has been about two to three times per year. J Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Construction /Maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total 80,000 80,000 Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Utility Funds - Stm Swr 80,000 80,000 an Ann an Ann . . f � of Vu REPORT /RECD M MEN DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: WS V. From: John Wallin Finance Director Action ® Discussion ❑ Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Review Draft Utility Rate Study ACTION REQUESTED: See attached draft Utility Rate Study for discussion at the work session. No formal action is expected. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The draft Utility Rate Study as prepared by the City's consultant Ehlers is attached for your discussion. Mark Ruff from Ehlers is expected to be at the work session. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Utility Rate Study November, 2011 Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota 1000 E H L E RS Minnesota LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Offices also in Wisconsin and Illinois Financial Planning Prepared By: City Staff And Ehlers www.ehlers- inc.com phone 651 -697- 8500 3060 Centre Pointe Drive fax 651- 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1122 toll free 800 -552 -1171 Table of Contents EXECUTIVESUMMARY ........................................................:.......... ..............................1 GOALS OF A UTILITY RATE STUDY .............................................. ..............................2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS ...... ..............................3 WATERSYSTEM ...... ............................... ..................................... ..............................5 Description of the Water System ................................................................. ............................... 5 HistoricFinancial Trends ............................................................................. ............................... 5 CurrentRate Structure: Water Fees ............................................................. ............................... 6 Pro -Forma Analysis Assumptions ...:........................................................... .................a............. 6 ProposedWater Rates .................................................................................. ............................... 7 Recommendation for Water Fees ............................................................... ............................... 10 SEWERSYSTEM ............................................................................. .............................11 Pro -Forma Analysis Assumptions ............................................................. ............................... 11 ProposedSewer Rates ............................................................................. ............................... 11 Proposed Sanitary Sewer City Connection Fees ............................... ..... ............................... 11 Recommended Sewer Fund Cash Balances ............................................... ............................... 12 STORMSEWER SYSTEM ............................................................... .............................15 ProposedStorm Sewer Rates ..................................................................... ............................... 15 RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................:........ .............................19 Comparisons to Other Cities' Rates ............... .......................Appendix A Water Utility Projections .............................. .......................Appendix B Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections .................. .......................Appendix C Storm Water Utility Projections ..................... ......:................Appendix D Capital Improvement Plan for Water .............. .......................Appendix E Capital Improvement Plan for Sanitary Sewer .. .......................Appendix F Capital Improvement Plan for Storm Sewer .... .......................Appendix G Proposed Residential Rate Tier Options ......... .......................Appendix H Executive Summary The goal of a rate study is to ensure long -term financial health of the utility enterprise funds. • As part ofthis analysis; °the rate study takes into account historic trends, assumptions and state law, as applicable. • The City Of Edina has been reinvesting in its utility systems through street :and utility reconstruction projects, water treatment plants, nand storm water improvements.`:: The capital projects bring financial pressures to the utility funds. The City currently uses a combination of pay -as- you -go and bond financing for its capital,needs. We expect that debt will continue to be necessary to support the capital improvements in the near future. It is the City's goal to reduce the issuance of debt in the long -term, and this rate study shows that, over time, the City will be able to pay for more projects with cash on hand. o The Metropolitan Council will likely increase sanitary sewer rates in the next several years to compensate for a lack of revenues from hook -up fees. Future increases in City sewer rates will also likely be necessary to keep pace with the Met Council rates. • No changes to the. rate structure are proposed. Recommendations o Recommendation One: Adopt the rate changes proposed for 2012 ■ 6% increase to water rates 4% increase to sewer rates ■ 5% increase to storm: sewer rates i Recommendation Two: Update the - utility study periodically to determine progress with cash balance goals and an updated capital improvement plan. Utility Rule Study . Page I City of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Goals of a Utility Rate Study The City of Edina requested that Ehlers update the rate study of its water, storm water, and sanitary sewer system utilities. The purpose. of the rate study- is, to ensure that: 1. Rates are sufficient to pay for the ongoing opera_ tions and capital improvements, and to maintain adequate cash balances. 2. The rate structure distributes the costs of operating the system across utility users consistent with the policy objectives of the Council. 3. Staff and Council revisit cash balance policies to ensure they are meeting. their enterprise system's current and future needs. 4. The rate structure distributes the costs: of operating the system across utility users consistent with the policy objectives of the Council. 111ifuv Ride Slru v 1168e 2 (711 of Edind. Hinnesord November, 2011 Background Information on Enterprise Systems Enterprise Funds Most City operations, such as public works, public safety, administration and parks, are accounted for under governmental funds, primarily embedded in the General Fund. These operations usually depend on a variety of revenues, including property taxes, intergovernmental aid, and charges for services. Municipal utility funds are considered "enterprise funds." They are intended to be operated as a private enterprise in which the fee revenue pays for all operations. City operations include three utility funds: water, sewer, and storm sewer. In the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), enterprise funds are segregated funds, recognizing the unique purpose and revenue streams of these City functions. In addition to the CAFR segregating the enterprise funds, the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) distinguishes between projects that will be funded by the enterprise funds, and those funded by general governmental funds. The Water Fund: The Influence of Rainfall The City's water is provided by groundwater wells that pumped 2,478,378,000 gallons in 2010. The City also purchases water from the City of Minneapolis, which is in turn provided to the residents of the Morningside area. Water demand, and thus revenues, is highly dependent on weather patterns. The graph on page 5 shows a consistent decline in water usage since 2006. The need to reinvest in the City's aging utility systems continues to place financial stresses on the utility fund,. particularly related to water. The City's recent and projected investments for replacing and improving the water and sewer systems. are significant. Between 2006 and 2010, the City spent over $15.6 million on capital improvements in the utility fund. Faced with increasing capital costs, the City has increased user rates annually since 2006. In addition, in 2007 the City modified water rates to add usage tiers. The usage tiers charge higher water rates at higher levels of consumption. The rationale for a tiered rate structure was three -fold: 1. A tiered rate structure may promote water conservation and is now required by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as discussed below. 2. By charging more for water used on the lawn than water used in the home, the City is ensuring that essential water use remains as affordable as possible. 3. Cities construct water systems to meet the capacity of peak watering days in the summer. In Edina, the peak daily summer demand is approximately three times the average daily winter demand. A tiered rate system charges more per gallon for peak use, thereby allocating the cost of "oversizing" the system for peak days to the peak users. Utility Rate Slndy Page 3 City of Edina. Minnesota November, 2011 The purpose of this update is to determine how rates will need to be adjusted for 2012 and beyond to keep the utilities financially self - sufficient. . This study incorporates the proposed 2012 -2016 capital improvement plan for the utilities, and estimates of future capital costs from 2017 and beyond. It should be noted that the City currently has one accounting fund for water, sanitary sewer, storm water, and recycling. For this analysis, we segregated the revenues and expenses for each utility, and treated each as a separate fund. By doing so, we can ensure that each utility will "pay its own way." Municipal utility funds are considered "enterprise funds," meaning they are intended to be operated as a private enterprise in which the fee revenue pays for all expenses. For purposes of this study, we refer to each segregated utility as its own fund. The Sewer Fund: The Metropolitan Council Influence The City of Edina participates in the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer system. This means that the City's sanitary sewer system flows to the MCES treatment plant and the City receives a bill from the MCES for the service. The City does not maintain its own sanitary sewer treatment plant. The MCES disposal fees have increased since 2005. Currently, the 2011 MCES charge for service is budgeted at $4,383,700, and is estimated to be $4,244,100 in 2012. We have estimated that the MCES charge will increase by 5.50% per year after 2012. MCES allocates the cost of the metro area sanitation system to a user city based on the relative percent of that city's flow into the system. The Met Council is also facing its own financial pressures on operating rates as new construction of residential and commercial development has slowed in the region, as well as rising debt service needs. If the MCES rates are lower than anticipated in 2013 and later, the City may be able to correspondingly lower its rate increases Edina's share of the cost may change by more than 5.50 %. The MCES disposal fees comprise approximately 74% of the sewer utility operating expenses. The Storm Sewer Fund: The City's Perspective The storm sewer fund was created to manage storm water runoff quality in concert with the local watershed. City projects often include repair and maintenance of drainage ditches, storm water ponds, and other wetland outlets. Single family residential properties pay a fixed quarterly fee. Commercial property owners are charged based on the amount of impervious surface that does not allow rainwater to be absorbed into the ground, but rather flows through the drainage ditches and into local lakes and streams. Over time, capital costs for the storm water system have increased to meet state standards and improve water quality. Utility Rate Study Page 4 City of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Water System Description of the Water System The graph below shows the historic water usage from 2003 to 2010. Historic Water Usage 3,500,000, 000 3,000, 000, 000 2,500,000,000 2,000,000,000 1, 500, 000, 000 1,000,000,000 500,000,000 M 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ■Gallons Sdd (Source: Department of Natural Resources Annual Report of Water Use) Factors impacting the amount of water usage include: 1) change in the number of users / accounts from new development or closures; 2) consumption patterns of individual users and 3) weather (dry summers translate into heavier water demand). Historic Financial Trends The following graph for the Water Utility shows the trend of operating revenues and expenses. The fund has been managed effectively because revenues have exceeded expenses. Furthermore, overall cash balances, as discussed later, are at healthy levels because bond issues for capital projects have also been managed effectively. 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000, 000 — 4,000,000 3,000, 000 2,000,000 1,000, 000 — 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 ■ Total operating revenues ■ Total operating expense Utilitv Rate S7udv Page 5 Cin• 4 Ediuut, Minnesota November. 2011 Current Rate Structure: Water Fees There are three primary components to the City's water utility revenues: • Fixed Charges • Usage Fees • WAC Fees (Water Access Fees or hook -up charges) 1) Fixed Charges are a fixed quarterly fee based on the property type and number of units. The fixed charge is established to recover certain fixed expenses, such as the billing system, that the City must incur for a customer regardless of the amount of water consumed. The 2011 fixed charge for single family residential accounts is $14.29 per quarter. The fee does not include any water usage and increases as the size of the meter increases. This fixed charge raises approximately $900,000 per year. This charge pays for administration of the system and a portion of the operating cost. 2) Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water. Currently the billing structure is tiered. The first tier of usage is $1.17 per cubic feet to 3,500 cubic feet. The second tier is a rate of $1.55 from usage over 3,500 cubic feet to 6,500 cubic feet. Usages over 6,500 cubic feet are charged a rate of $2.43 per cubic feet. Water usage in the Morningside area is charged at $2.34 per unit for all usage. The usage fee generates approximately $4,400,000 in annual revenues and pays for the remainder of operating, debt, and capital expenditures. The usage charge represents 84% of operating revenues. The fixed charge accounts for the remaining 16% of revenues. 3) Water Connection Fees are paid by new construction of homes and businesses at the time of a building permit and are based upon residential equivalents of usage. The City of Edina charges $800 per residential equivalency unit for new development. These connection fees will help pay for the capital costs of serving the new properties. To be conservative, the financial analysis does not count on any development related connection fee revenue for 2012 and beyond. We would recommend that the City increase its connections fees annually by an inflationaiyfactor. Pro -Forma Analysis Assumptions Fn11n %v;nv ;c a nhart that summarizes the siLynificant assumptions in the rate study. A summary of the CIP can be found in Appendix E. Utility Rate Study Page 6 City of Ediaa, Minnesota November, 2011 Water Utility Growth and Utility No new connections. The estimated usage for the existing residents is Usage anticipated to be the 2010 usage levels. As the chart on page 5 shows, water usage has been declining since 2006. Weather patterns are the biggest determinant of usage revenues. In order to conservatively project revenues, usa a is not expected to increase. Operating Expenses Increase 3% annually Capital Expenses Costs of improvements are inflated 4% per year. Future total capital improvements from 2012 to 2019 are estimated at an,inflated value of $223M and include two water treatment plants in the 2011/2012 to 2015 timeframe. Rate Structure No thane proposed to proposed rate structure. A summary of the CIP can be found in Appendix E. Utility Rate Study Page 6 City of Ediaa, Minnesota November, 2011 Proposed Water Rates Meter Charges are proposed to increase 6% in 2012. Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water for all customers, except those in the Momingside area, are based on a tiered approach to charging for water usage. All types of property are included in the tiering of rates, although at different levels. The most recent rate study completed in 2009 projected a 5.5% rate increase for 2012. Usage has declined and the resulting revenues have declined slightly. Because the majority of the water costs are fixed, decrease in water consumption does not directly result in decreased operating costs. Therefore, this study recommends a slightly higher rate increase in order to maintain the financial health of the system and to provide for future operating and capital needs. The chart below shows a proposed 6% increase in usage rates. Usage Fees for Morningside are projected to increase at the same rate as the City as a whole. Edina obtains water for the Momingside area residents from the City of Minneapolis. In 2009, the City of Edina negotiated with the City of Minneapolis to lower the usage rate that is charged for water provided to the Momingside area. Historically, Edina has billed Momingside residents at the cost of water that is paid to Minneapolis plus $36 per 100 cubic feet. The recommended rate for the Momingside area is projected to increase at slightly less than the City as a whole for 2012. Proposed Residential Water Rates Annual rate increases of 6% will be needed to operate and improve the City's water system. The chart below shows the proposed residential water rates. Usage Actual Proposed Gallons 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 201 Rate increase 0.009E 6.OD% 6.0096 6.00% 6.00% 6.OD% 6.0090 610% 6.OD% 0-35 units $1.17 $1.24 $1.31 $1.39 $1.48 $1.57 SI.66 SI.76 $1.8 Ratc Increase 0.00% 600% 6.00% 6.00% 6.OD% 6.0096 6.00% 6.00% 6.OD% 36.65 units $1.55 $1.64 60D`£ $1.74 6.OD% $1.85 60D% $1.96 &OD% $2.07 6M% $220 up $2.33 690% $2.47 (LW% Rate fnt�ti3bc 0009E > 65vnils S2.4 3 S238 5173 52.89 33.07 94 -- 33,45 SW � _ S3 Momingside 0- 35units 2.34 2.46 2.59 2.72 2.86 3.01 3.17 3.31 3. 36.65units 2.34 2.46 2.59 272 2.86 3.01 3.17 3.31 3. > 65 units 2.34 2.46 2.59 2.72 2.86 3.01 3.17 3.31 3. 0.0090 5,00% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 5-10% 5.30% 450% 4.50% Irrigation /Sprinkler Meters Water connections used solely for sprinklers for residential customers are charged at the same rate as regular water usage in the same usage tiers. Water connections used in sprinklers for commercial customers are charged the two highest tiers at a rate of $1.55 per unit for 0 -35 units per quarter, and $2.43 for each unit over 35 units. The proposed 2012 commercial irrigation water rates are $1.64 and $2.58, respectively. Utility Rate Stttdy Page 7 Cit.), of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Commercial Customers Commercial customers are charged on the first two tiers. Water consumption of 0 -35 units is $1.17 per unit, and all water consumption over 35 units is $1.55 per unit. The proposed 2012 rates are $1.24 and $1.64 respectively. Water Connection Fees The City of Edina charges $800 per residential equivalency unit for new development. These connection fees will help pay for the capital costs of serving the new properties. To be conservative, the financial analysis does not count on any development .related connection fee revenue for 2012 and beyond. We would recommend that the City increase its connections fees annually by an inflationary factor. Operating Margins and Cash Balance Below is a chart that demonstrates the future cash balances for the water fund. It is important to remember that the water fund income will vary significantly by the volume of water used by residents and businesses. As the chart on page 5 illustrates, water usage has been declining. The amount of rain in a summer is a primary determinant of the volume of water used. The tiering of rates does augment the fluctuations in income because the marginal use of water is priced at the highest tier. The chart below shows operating revenues, expenses and cash balances. As described below, cash balances decline because capital projects in future years are paid with cash. l Water Operating Revenue and Expenses (with Cash Balances) 1 111 1 11 • 111 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WFAPP'm� + a�� ®o�{r��1 ME E12' I 1 . 111 111 � 1 11 11 1 ri�i { f ��91 1� • 111 111 •i t i ■� -.i) Ff��1 7 ;� is., t a f7 111 111 j t Ro� 111 111 ' ®f i ' !:,� t"II ; OR 1, km 111 111 V" 1. 11 11 1�!- Air .� 05k Operating Expenses ri—ims Operating Revenues —Cash Balance 1/• 1 1 1 1 1 1� / 1. 1 1 1• Utility Rate Study Page 8 Cin of Edina, Minnesota November, 2Ull Cash Balances and Prudent Use of Debt Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue depending on weather, and to fund unexpected repairs and a portion of capital improvements. Over the long term, the City's goal is a cash balance equal to 50% of operating revenues. The chart below demonstrates the projected cash balance as compared to the City's goal for operating reserves. Water Fund Cash Balances 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 ■Target Cash 1,000,000 Balance ■Cash Balance 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 The cash balance spikes in 2010 and 2011 are due to proceeds from bonds issued for the 2011 and 2012 capital improvement projects. The cash balance will decline in 2012 as the projects are completed and paid for. In order to maintain a positive cash position and achieve the target cash reserve over the long term, the City will need to finance all of its capital improvements in the near term. The projections and the proposed rate increases were structured so that the City will be less reliant on annual bond financing in the future. The projections assume most capital costs will be financed over the next three years and, beginning in 2016, bonds will be issued only every other year. This is shown in the chart above and accounts for the decline in cash balance in 2016 and 2018, the years when capital projects are financed 100% with cash on hand. This is a change from the last study, when all capital projects were financed. Capital projects financed with debt are amortized over a ten -year period and interest rates are estimated based on a spread over current market conditions. The chart below demonstrates how much capital is to be expended and how much debt is to be issued in each year. Utility Rate Study Page 9 November, 2011 Cite of Edina, Minnesota Water Capital Expenses and Debt Issues 10,000,000 9,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 T. 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 �. 1,000,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 wCeptalExpedrures eBordProceads It is unrealistic to expect ratepayers to fund the level of proposed improvements and fully fund depreciation at the same time. As was stated above, the projections move away from annual bonding for capital improvements. By keeping the term of the debt to ten years, the City will be able to: 1) Protect its bond rating; and 2) Allow time after the debt is retired to fund replacement reserves and reduce reliance on debt in the future. Recommendation for Water Fees Based on the completed rate study, we would recommend: 1) The 2012 meter charges and usage water rates increase 6% from 2011 as shown in Appendix A. The rate study projects a 6% annual water rate increase after 2012. 2) The City Council review and establish water rates on an annual basis. Utility Rate Study Page 10 Cio, of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Sewer System Pro -Forma Analysis Assumptions Proposed Sewer Rates 2011 Sewer Rates The 2011 rate is $2.96 per unit of sewer based on water used during the winter quarter. One unit is 100 cubic feet or approximately 750 gallons. The sewer usage is assumed to be identical to water usage during the winter quarter when there is almost no outside water use (car washing, lawn sprinkling, swimming pool, etc.). There is a minimum quarterly fee, regardless of use, of $47.36 (16 units or 1600 cubic feet). The minimum charge helps pay for the fixed costs of the system. Proposed 2012 Sewer Rates The projected rate increase for sanitary sewer is 4.0% per year from 2012 to 2019. Revenues have been strong in this fund. The previous 2009 report recommended a 5.5% increase for 2012. Strong revenues, combined with healthy cash balances have allowed for the lower rate increase. We do not recommend changing the rate.structure at this time. The unit charge and the minimum quarterly charge would both be increased by 4% for 2012. The proposed rate per unit is in the chart below. The rate applies to all residential and commercial customers in Edina. Sanitary Sanitary Sewer Utility Growth and Utility Usage Sewer usage will remain constant Operating Expenses City expenses increase 3% annually Capital Expenses Costs of improvements are inflated 4% per year. Future total capital improvements from 2012 to 2019 are estimated at an inflated value of $9.2M. Rate Structure Sewer billed based on winter quarter water consumption. Proposed Sewer Rates 2011 Sewer Rates The 2011 rate is $2.96 per unit of sewer based on water used during the winter quarter. One unit is 100 cubic feet or approximately 750 gallons. The sewer usage is assumed to be identical to water usage during the winter quarter when there is almost no outside water use (car washing, lawn sprinkling, swimming pool, etc.). There is a minimum quarterly fee, regardless of use, of $47.36 (16 units or 1600 cubic feet). The minimum charge helps pay for the fixed costs of the system. Proposed 2012 Sewer Rates The projected rate increase for sanitary sewer is 4.0% per year from 2012 to 2019. Revenues have been strong in this fund. The previous 2009 report recommended a 5.5% increase for 2012. Strong revenues, combined with healthy cash balances have allowed for the lower rate increase. We do not recommend changing the rate.structure at this time. The unit charge and the minimum quarterly charge would both be increased by 4% for 2012. The proposed rate per unit is in the chart below. The rate applies to all residential and commercial customers in Edina. Sanitary Sewer 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Rate per $2.96 $3.08 $3.20 $3.33 $3.46 $3.60 $3.75 $3.90 $4.05 Unit Proposed Sanitary Sewer City Connection Fees The City charges a sewer connection fee for new users to "buy -in" to the system. Connection, fees are paid at the time a builder or homeowner pulls a building permit. The connection fee in the City of Edina Utility Rate Study Page 11 MY of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 is $400 per residential equivalency unit. In addition, the City collects the MCES connection fee and remits it to the Metropolitan Council. The City sewer connection fees will help offset City sanitary sewer infrastructure costs associated with new development and redevelopment. To be conservative, the projections presented in the Appendices to the rate study do not consider the collection of any connection fee revenues for projects not already approved. We would recommend an annual inflationary increase to the connection fee. 10,000,000 9,000,000 9,000.000 7,000.000 8,000.000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2.000,000 1,000,000 0 Sanitary Sewer Operating Margins (with Debt) 2008 201D 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2018 2017 2018 ®Opore11n9 Revenue �Operalln0 EKpeneeeoCach Balenw The above graph shows that steady rate increases are necessary in order fund operations. Recommended Sewer Fund Cash Balances The target cash balance for the sewer fund equals 50% of sewer operating revenues. We are recommending an increase in the target cash balance for unexpected sewer operation interruptions, such as main breaks. The projections increase the target cash balance by $500,000 for this reason. The graph below portrays the projected cash balances based on the stated assumptions and proposed capital expenditures. It can be seen that the proposed rate increases and use of debt financing should be adequate to achieve the target cash balance. Utility Rate Study Page 12 00- of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Sanitary Sewer Cash Balances 6,000,000 - 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 ■ Target Cash Balance 0 ■Cash Balance 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue, pay for new and unexpected regulatory requirements, to fund a portion of capital improvements, and to establish replacement reserves. As with the Water Fund, the proposed sewer rates will move the City away from annual bond issues for capital improvements. The prior study showed bond issues every year. Healthy cash balances and prudent management of the utility has allowed for the use of cash to pay for most capital improvements in the future. Utility Rate Study Page 13 City of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Sanitary Sewer Capital Expenses and Debt Issues 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 f 17 " L= _ - k - - -- 1,500,000 - =- -_ — -- _ 1,000,000 -_ - - - - 500,000 0 -- - 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 ■ Capital Expeditures ■9OndProoeeds Recommendation for Sanitary Sewer Fees Based on the completed rate study, we would recommend that the City increase sewer rates 4% per year for 2012 and future years, in order to meet the goals of funding capital improvements of the system and target cash reserves. Utility Rate Study Page 14 Cite of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Storm Sewer system Storm Sewer revenues are based on a fixed quarterly fee based on the type of property being served. The quarterly charge is established to pay for the cost of operating and maintaining the system. Proposed Storm Sewer Rates Over the next five years, the City anticipates approximately $9.1 million in capital costs to address storm water from drain tile. systems, expand storm water ponds, rehabilitate lift stations and replace its aging storm water system. Storm water rates will need to be increased to fund the capital projects and maintain minimum cash reserves. The City's current quarterly storm water rate is $19.58 per quarter. The proposed rate increases in the chart below will allow the City to maintain and improve its storm water infrastructure, as well as sustaining adequate cash reserves. These rates are consistent with the rates proposed in previous studies, and are comparable with other fully developed metro area communities. 2011 2012 2013 1 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 $19.58 $20.56 $21.59 $22.67 $23.12 $23.58 $24.05 $24.53 $25.03 Cities across the state will be facing pressure to generate more revenue to fund storm water systems. The Clean Water Legacy Act provided funding to test and develop plans for Minnesota's polluted waterways. These plans may, result in new unfunded mandates for local governments. While the future requirements for managing the quality and quantity of storm water are unknown, the level of projected capital expenses in this study should pay for many of the mandated improvements. Our experience with other cities indicates that most have not yet planned for significant improvements to their storm water system, and their quarterly fees are established at a level that will only pay for the annual operations and maintenance of the storm water system. As more cities undertake planning for capital improvements to their storm water systems, we expect to see higher storm water utility fees across the metro area. Utility Rate Study Page 15 Cite of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 , 1 HE 0 E Ell ,,,,,,� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ ,,,,,1 ■ ■ ■ ■0 ■0 ■0 1 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Debt Service Operabng Expenses •. The chart above indicates that cash balances will be sufficient to fund most of the capital improvements. Future capital improvements are dependent upon unknown regulatory requirements and could increase in the future. Future Debt for Capital Improvements We are projecting bond proceeds of approximately $2M for the currently proposed capital improvements of $9.1M for the time period of 2012 to 2016 with a 10 year amortization to balance the current cash needs of the system with future cash flows. As cash balances and project costs are evaluated in the future, the amount of debt and the term of debt can be re- evaluated. Cash Balances The purpose of the cash balance is to allow the City to fund routine improvements on a "pay -as- you -go" basis, reserving the use of debt for major improvements, and have operating reserves available for cashflow purposes. It is our recommendation that the system be operated to maintain a minimum cash balance approximately equal to $2M. As was stated above, capital needs are dependent upon maintaining the system and responding to potential regulatory requirements. The projected cash balances, assuming the proposed rates above, are shown in the following graph. Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Page 16 November, 2011 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 Storm Sewer Cash Balances ■Target Cash Balance ■Ending cash Utility Rafe Sludv Page 17 Cite of Edinct, Adinnesola November, 2011 Putting It All Together: The Utility Bill The chart below shows the total utility bill for sample residents who use varying amounts of water. Because residents view their utilities together in one bill, we have included water, sanitary, and storm water charges, along with a cumulative total. City of Edina Sample Projected Residential Utility Bills Sa slelFamfl'�Glua�erl ;Bills..:. �' _:�`,::3201A��'•f %2012�'i. �".��201:3��2014t_'�� :.'2015 Winter months - 30 units water and sewer Sewer 88.80 92.35 96.05 99.89 103.88 Water 49.39 52.35 55.49, 58.82 62.35 Storm Water 19.58. 20.56 21.59. 22.67 23.12 Total $ 157.77 $ 165.26 $ 173.13 $ 181.38 $ 189.36 Combined Fee Increase - $ 8.56 $ 7.49 $ 7.86 $ 8.25 $ 7.98 Percent Increase 5.740/a 4.75% 4.76% 4.77% 4.40% Summer months - 50 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 88.80 92.35 96.05 99.89 103.88 Water 78.49 83.20 88.19: 93.48 99.09 Storm Water 19.58 20.56 21.59 2267 23.12 Total $ 186.87 $ 196.11 $ 205.82 $ 216.04 $ 226.09 Combined Fee Increase $.. 16.06: S. 9.24 S. 9.71 $ 10.21_ $ 10.06 Percent Increase 5.69 0/6- 4.940/6 -4.95% 4.96% 4.66% Sa I $u n Tier Gluarferl Bllltr: -, -E .1 M013E 7. :," N0,14 100 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 88.80 92.35 96.05 99.89 103.88 Water 186.79 198.00 209.89 222.47 235.82 Storm Water 19.58 20.56. 21.59 22.67 23.12 Total $ 295.17 $ 310.91 $ 327.51 $ 345.62 $ 362.82 Combined Fee Increase $ 15.81 $ 15.74 $ 16.60 $ 17.51 $ 17.80 Percent Increase 5.66% 5.33% 5.340/6 5.35% 5.166/0 Sa "'Ie O lllfor'-wownUtiif " %UserLn �. ?201r1', ,;x2012�a`';1 72013_ 777-7.7 ;201r4`wti_ 'u201:5 4 v' 12 units water and sewer Sewer (minimum quarterly rate) 47.36 49.25 151.22 5327 55.40 Water 28.33 30.03 31.83 33.74 35.77 Storm Water 19.58 20.56 21.59 22.67 23.12 Total $ 95.27 $ 99.84 $ 104.64 $ 169.68 $ 114.29 Combined. Fee Increase $ 5.38 $ 4.57 $ 4.80 $ 5.04 $ 4.61 Percent Increase 5.99% 4.80% 4.81% 4.81% 4.20% Utility Rate Study Page 18 City of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Recommendations The City of Edina has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for improvements through a combination of cash and debt. The need to reinvest in the water and sewer utility system over the next several years will put financial pressures on all of the utility funds. The rate study indicates that rate increases are necessary in 2012. Modest and steady annual rate increases will be needed for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities to pay for City operating costs and capital improvements. While this analysis proposes the use of debt to allow for steady and predictable rate increases, it is not a debt plan. The City should review whether it has sufficient cash to pay for capital improvements prior to issuing debt. At 'its option, the City may accumulate less cash in its utility funds (thereby funding less depreciation) in order to reduce the amount of new debt issued for utility improvements. As with all other bonding decisions, the City's decision to issue debt for any given improvement will be based on many factors, including the City's cash balances, rating, and other financing needs. Summary of Recommendations o Recommendation One: Adopt the rate changes proposed for 2012 as shown in Appendix A. ■ 6% increase to water rates ■ 4% increase to sewer rates ■ 5% increase to storm sewer rates O Recommendation Two: Update the utility rate study periodically Utility Rate Study Page 19 MY of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Appendices to this report follow: Appendix A Comparisons to Other Cities' Rates Appendix B Water Utility Projections Appendix C Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections Appendix D Storm Sewer Utility Projections Appendix E Capital Improvement Plan for Water Appendix F Capital Improvement Plan for Sanitary Sewer Appendix G Capital Improvement Plan for Storm Sewer Appendix H Proposed Residential Rate Tier Options Oility Race Study Page 20 Ci{r .ujl:di�rn: ;11inn�snta November. 2011 Appendix A Comparison of Rates in Comparable Cities Using proposed 2012 rates with a quarterly usage of 27,000 gallons of water and 13,500 gallons for sewer, plus storm water charges. The rates for the comparable communities are the actual 2011 rates. Comparison of Proposed Edina 2012 Rates to Total 2011 Water, Sewer, and Storm Water Charges per Quarter for Residential Users $200.00 $175.00 — $150.00 $125.00 $100.00 $75.00 $50.00 - - -- $25.00 $0.00 Morningside Non- I' - — — — Area Morningside Are a City of Richfield Cfty of Edina City of Edina City of Clty of Inver City of St. Lou City of City of Proposed 2012 Proposed 2012 Minnetonka Grove Heights Park Bloonngton Bloomington []Storm Water 13 Sewer OWater Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 Appendix B Water Utility Projections Utility Rate Study Cii)! of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 I 12 la 15 16 17 I8 1') 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 78 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 City of Edina Utility Funds - Water Fund Water Fund Usage/ftxed rate increase 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% Other revenue increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Expenditure increase 3.00% 3,0090 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Investment Earnings 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 155,000 Per Financial Statements Estimated Budget 164,440 169,373 174,454 Projected 185,078 190,630 5,683,113 5,439,194 20M 2010 2011 2012 201.1 2014 2015 '2016 2017 2018 2019 Revenues Charges for services Quarterly Meter Service Charges Charges for Water Usage Sale of Water Meters State Health Fee Other Total operating revenues Expenses Admin. Buildings Water Distribution Tanks, Towers, and Reservoirs Source of Supply Water Treatment Meter Reading Meter Repair Equip Operation Training Depreciation Total operating expense Operaung mcumc do��i Non operating rev (exp) Investment income Gain (loss) on disposal of asset Interest Expense: 2003C Bonds Interest Expense: 2007B Bonds Interest Expense: 2008A Bonds Interest Expense: 2011A Bonds Miscellaneous Intergovernmental Total non-operating Revenue Net income (loss) Operating transfer in Operating toaster out Net change to tetainal earnings Beginning tetaincd earnings Ending retained camings 5,455,830 5,123,540 5,100,000 5,708,013 6,048,725 6,409,790 6,792,424 7,198,373 7,628,594 8.082,515 8,563,502 26.381 13,845 15,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 98,638 88,042 90,000 106,090 109,273 112,551 115,927 119,405 122,987 126,677 130,477 112,264 213,767 110,000 155,000 159,650 164,440 169,373 174,454 179,687 185,078 190,630 5,683,113 5,439,194 5,315,000 6,000,103 6,348,648 6,717,780 7,108,724 7,523,232 7,962,269 8,425,270 8,915,609 631.898 602,324 555,582 613,417 631,820 650,774 670,297 690,406 711,118 732,452 754,426 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,710,834 1,284,639 1,481,786 1,479,455 1,523,839 1,569,554 1,616,640 1,665,140 1,715,094 1,766,547 1,819,543 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 385,778 542,163 665,100 760,713 783.534 807,040 831,252 856,189 881,875 908,331 935,581 475,790 526,489 586,747 613,898 632,315 651,284 670,823 690,948 711,676 733,026 755,017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,107,148 1,128,097 1,526,271 1,610,000 1.658,300 1,708,049 1,759,290 1,812,069 1.866,431 1,922,424 1,980,097 4,311,448 4,083,712 4,815,486 5,077,483 5,229,807 5,386,702 5,548,303 5,714,752 5,886,194 6,062,780 6,244,664 1�1[ 1.355.183 499.514 922,620 1,118.840 lJX079 1S60,421 1.808,480 1076.074 2,36?490 «670.946 31,559 13,734 22.000 21,560 92,923 ' 96,266 97,971 91,662 63,775 82,886 66,701 (28,063) !23303) 1J8.4iGi (12T. (6,568) (105,400) (94.800) (83.800) 172,300) (60,3W) (47,800) (34,8W) (21,300) (7,200) (276,106) 883337) (262.712) (240.431) (216,462) (190,624) (161,787) (129,700) (95.200) (59,200) (20,400) (158.7301 (200.850) (184,750) (167.800) (150550) (132.950) (115,000) (96,700) (378,009) (387.9051 (342.982) (462.679) (391.256) (326.908) (266.416) (209,888) (171,575) (91,314) (50.399) 993,656 967,577 156,532 459,941 727,584 1,004,171 1,294,005 1,598,592 1,904,499 2,271,176 2,620,546 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 993,656 967,577 156,532 459,941 727,584 1,004,171 1,294,005 1,598,592 1,904,499 2,271,176 2,620,546 4,652,057 5.645,713 6,613,291 6,769,823 7,229.764 7,957,348 8,961,519 10,255525 11,854,117 13,758,616 16.029.792 5,645.713 6,613,291 6,769,823 7,229,764 7,957,348 8,961,519 10,255,525 11,854,117 13.758,610 16,029,792 18,650,338 City of Edina 6.00% 6.00% 6,00% 3.00% Utility Funds - Water Fund 3.00% 3.009r 3.007, 3.00% Water Fund 3.00 m 1.75% A 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 6.0056 6.0056 6.00`1 6.00`;:, UwSe/Ftzed rate increase 3.007, 3.0051 3.00rm 1007, Olhcr revenue increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.()0`.F 3.00:, E=xpenditure Increase 1.75% 1.75% 1.755E 1.751k hrvcatmem Earnings 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6,00% 3.00% 3.00''17 3.00% 3.009r 3.007, 3.00% 3.005E 3.00 m 1.75% A 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1r, Ca Al no%v 57 Operaling income (Wssl 1 Per Financial Smtun • •ma E Esummed B Budccl , 2013 2 2014 2 2015 2 , ",Jcctc 2017 2 2018 2 2019 499,514 9 922,620 1 1.118.8-10 1,331,079 1,560.421 1.805.480 2074.074 2.342490 ' '.670,946 58 Depreciation 1 1.107.148 1 1.12 &097 1 1.526.271 1 1.610.000 1 1.658.300 I I7US.W9 1 1,759.290 1 1,812,069 1 1,866.431 1 1,9 12.42.1 1 1,980.097 62 Bond payments 2003C Prin ( (160.000) ( (165.000) ( (172.500) ( (180.000) ( (185,000) 63 Bond payinews 2007B Prin ( (260,000) ( (270,000) ( (280.000) ( (295.000) ( (305.000) ( (320.000) ( (330,000) ( (345.000) ( (360.000) (920,000) ( (9(,0.000) 64 Bond payments ZOOSA Prin ( (365,000) ( (675.000) ( (100.000) ( (725,000) ( (750.000) ( (780,000) ( (810,00O ( (570.000) ( (890.000) ( (905.000) ( (925,000) 65 Bond payownls 2011 A Prin ( (3(p(.982) ( (484239) ( (770.000) ( (840,000) ( (364.387) ( (301.550) ( (235.350) ( (174.200) ( (117,100) 66 Nonoperaung ( 0 U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 0 U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 NIiscellanou. 0 31.559 1 13.734 2 22.00(1 2 21.560 9 92.91 -3 9 96,266 9 97.971 9 91.662 6 63.775 8 82.886 6 66.701 GB Invuuuem income 3 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U 69 Tiaa >fcn 0 70 �9 'Ikt 8 8.357.700) ? ?Ai1 ( (3,299,920) ( (4,083,040) ( (5,583,825) ( (1,211,973) ( (1,216,653) ( (1,265,319) ( (1,315.932) 71 Capital � 1646,NDJ) 73 2007 proceeds spent ' '4Ui 2 2 1 1.368.600 74 on rocs 75 Bonds: 76 77 78 79 Debt (M) - 2012 Bonds -4 &, 10 yn 80 Debt (PSI) • 2013 Bonds 81 Debt W&II) - 2014 Bunds 82 Debt (1'&- 1) -'_015 Bonds 83 Debt (PSI) - 2016 Bondi 84 Debt tpcu- 2017 nunds 85 Debt (P&I) - 2016 Bonds 86 Dcbt(PSI) -2019 Bonds 87 Debt (PS) - 2020 Bonds 92 93 NclCuAnoW r,3_1�� 1,039,265 94 95 ltegmmncva,h 5:994.:60 5930.905 96 97 Endingeash 59.11005 6,970,170 99 100 Target cash balance (50% of 01nmtir 2,841.557 2.719.597 102 Actual cash over (under) minumum c 3.089.348 4.250.573 7.10.80.1 6,970.I7u 7.700.973 2,657,500 5,043.473 (184.936) (184936) (184936) (184.936) (184.936) (184.936) (I &t,936) (406.860) (406.860) (406.860) (406.860) (406,860) (406.860) (493,164) (493,164) (493,164) (493,164) (493,164) t647.277) (617,277) (647.277) (6.17,277) 0 U 0 (295,898) (295.898) 0 ,2,391.059) 191.028 97,384 1360,1901 (1593 .5501 1.09LO40 740.176 7.700.973 5.30),914 5.,,(0.942 5.598.326 5.237.836 3.644.]Nh 3.N11.471 {0(19.914 SS001942 5.598-326 .1,237.836 1.614,286 4.736..1:6 J.8 11.471 4.551.647 3.DU11.051 3.174,324 3.358.590 3,554.362 3:6Lblb 3981.134 4,212,635 4.457.805 2.309.863 2326,615 .1,239,436 1.683.474 nm 755.192 1111 1(,4) 93.842 102 Actual cash over (under) minumum c 3.089.348 4.250.573 7.10.80.1 6,970.I7u 7.700.973 2,657,500 5,043.473 (184.936) (184936) (184936) (184.936) (184.936) (184.936) (I &t,936) (406.860) (406.860) (406.860) (406.860) (406,860) (406.860) (493,164) (493,164) (493,164) (493,164) (493,164) t647.277) (617,277) (647.277) (6.17,277) 0 U 0 (295,898) (295.898) 0 ,2,391.059) 191.028 97,384 1360,1901 (1593 .5501 1.09LO40 740.176 7.700.973 5.30),914 5.,,(0.942 5.598.326 5.237.836 3.644.]Nh 3.N11.471 {0(19.914 SS001942 5.598-326 .1,237.836 1.614,286 4.736..1:6 J.8 11.471 4.551.647 3.DU11.051 3.174,324 3.358.590 3,554.362 3:6Lblb 3981.134 4,212,635 4.457.805 2.309.863 2326,615 .1,239,436 1.683.474 nm 755.192 1111 1(,4) 93.842 Appendix C Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections 0 Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 City of Edina Utility, Funds - Sanitary Sewer Fund Sanitary Salver Charges Increase 4.00. 4.00% 4.00%: 4.00% 4.0011. 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%. Investment Rate 1.73% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1,75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% Odicr ecwnuc increase 3.00% 3.00 %5 3.00% 3,0095 3.0011. 3.00% 3.001A 3.00%: A4CLS Disposal Cost Increase 5.50% 5.50% 530% 5.50% 5.50'Y 5.501. 5.50Y. 5.30% expenditure inceasc 3.00! 3.001,x. 3.00✓. 3.0011. 31001/0 3.00%11 3.00%. 3.001': (140,000) Per Finaneitil Stnternents Estimated Budget (1501000) (155,000) (160.000) Projected (175,000) (180,ODO) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 a) iu Cash Bon• 41 Operating income (loss) 4? Depreciation 46 Bond paymcnrs: 199t)A P &I 47 Bon( p5yments; 2003C Prin 4, Bond Payments: 20078 Prin 41t Bond Paymcnus: 2008A Prin in Bond Paysnenu :201 to Prin I Net other Invesuncnt incosra: c; �4 met Council I &1 Surcharge . , Met Council W Surebarge Re ;n Capital i7 2008 proceeds spent .SN Band proceeds i9 Bonds: all 61 6+ Debt (P &I) -2012 Bonds r,1 Debt (P &q -2013 Bonds Debt (1' &I) -2014 Bonds 116 Debt (P &q -2015 Bonds 67 Debt (P &1) - 2016 Bonds Gs Debt (NU) -2017 Bonds 61) Debt (P.M) - 2018 Bonds 70 Debt (I' &1) - 2019 Bonds 7I Debt (PSI) -2020 Bonds 73 Cum flow 't Beglaalry;cash Ending casts u Target Cash Balance (SO% of operating remures) 112 Acoul cash over (under) minim 1,387,118 1,138.320 1257.399 1,293,403 1.247,112 1,245,167 1',239,911 1.269.380 1,257.147 1.241,099 7'0.338 1,. 368,569 368,569 368.569 393.726 454,318 467,947 481,936 517,839 533,373 549.376 5651857 (317,810) (160,000) (165.000) (172.500) (180,000) (185.000) (130.000) (140,000) (145,000) (1501000) (155,000) (160.000) (170.000) (175,000) (180,ODO) (140,000) (260,000) (270,000) (280,000) (290,000) (300,000) (315.000) (325.000) (340,000) (355.000) (370.000) (60,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70.000) (70,000) (70.000) (73.W) 150,826) U5.513) 71:326 31,215 A001 49,000 1.:.027 59.054 57,941 72.568 72,880 70.736 71,133 ut 11.11) brut (50%) 0 (2,73111110) (922,4801 (897,723); ��:�� - +,) (766,257) (91.2,490) (948,989) 705,000 2.439,000 1.06) 700 1.000.000 (4%: for 10 years) (300,707) (300,707) (300,707) (300,707) (300.707) (300,707) (300.707) 0% for IQ years) 0 0 '.0 0 0 0 -(49: for 10 years) 0 0 0 0. 0 (41% for 10 years) (131,884) (131.884) (131,884) (131,884) (4% for 10 years) 0 0 0 (4.5% for 10 years) 0 0 (4.5% rot 10 years) 0 (4.5% rot ll O years) (4.5% for 10 years) 11.410.7911 1335.6391 (85.155) 679AS7 (284,1411) (63.604) 835.805 17.813 11».4.03) 22.704 977.275 4,810,846 3.400.056 3.063,377 2.979.222 3,658,679 3.374.531 3,310.927 4.146.732 4,164,545 4,042.039 4,064.743 3,400.056 3,064,377 2.979.222 3,658,679 3,374,531 3.310.927 4.146.732 4.164,545 4,042,039 4.4(14.743 5.042.019 3,370,386 3,458.151 4,076300 4.054.434 4.195,961 4.343.130 4A96,165 4.6S5.302 4,820,782 4,992,360 3.171,798 run cash 29.670 (393.77.9 " , --, -••1) 1;;1.4 }0) ,1.n;'.:o3, (;49.434) (490.'57) (77x,7431 (923.117) '12•+ ?80) City of Edina 4.00"!. 055: 3.00°1: 5,50% 3.001 Budget 4,00^. 1.7514 3.00'6 5.5041, 3.00 %, Utility Funds - Sanitary Sewer Fund 4.001 1.75% 3.(KM. 5.501/. 3.00%. 4.00v. 1.75% 3.00% 5.50% 3.00% Projected Sanitary Sewer Charges Increase 4.0090 1.755-. 3.001: 5.50'114 3.00% 4.00"1 1.75! 3.00% 5.50% 3.00 ",'. lovesuncnt Rate 2012 2013 Other revmue increase 2015 7016 MCES Disposal Cost Increase 2018 2019 Expenditure increase 6,97$,867 7,258.022 7.548.343 Per Finalleinl $I.1tC1T1c1114 8.164,287 X009 2010 Rcvcnucs 1 53,000 130,000 SvAvr Charycs 6,590,873 6.826,855 Cary SAC 150,706 155,1.17 Other 149,899 59.447 Totalupermi,il; -mmcs 6,740,772 6.916.302 " Binlims 8.641,564 8.985.720 Disposal Charges 4.132.873 4, 266,072 Admin. 631,898 602,324 Collection Svslcuu 220.315 541.018 Depreciation 368,569 368,569 Total opemting expense 5,353.655 5.777.983 Operallnl; income (loss) 1.387,118 1.138,320 _0 Nan operating rev (up) 541.018 557,249 Invesu lerlt incom 71.216 31,215 (mm Voss) un dlsposal of awl 646,004 665,384 _ Interesl Expanse: 19'/9A Douds '124410) 393,726 'a Interest F_spellse: NA13C Bonds (28.063) 123.'.'1',1 _ Interest Lxpcnse: 2007B Bonds 533.375 349,376 .a Inmesl Lxpense. 2008A Bonds 1106,553) 009.!" _ 27 Imeresl Expense:201 IA Bonds 6,441,092 6,752,420 2. NII.ccilalle"us 7,384,417 7,744,621 _ , Incclgovcmmrnml 1.2571399 1,293,403 :0 1,245,167 1,239,911 :I Total non uperating 0 (129.800) I ? Net mcumc Muss) 0 1.257.3 1 h 98$,469 .. Operit g I.-4crs In 59,054 57,941 1i, Opoatln', trallsters uut 72,880 70,736 3S Net clungc to rctlnlcd ealnuly 0 1;157,318 988,469 Fstimucd 4.00"!. 055: 3.00°1: 5,50% 3.001 Budget 4,00^. 1.7514 3.00'6 5.5041, 3.00 %, 4.00 "% 1.75% 3.00%. 5.50% 3.004: 4.001 1.75% 3.(KM. 5.501/. 3.00%. 4.00v. 1.75% 3.00% 5.50% 3.00% Projected 4.110% 1.75% 3.OD% 5.5(7 3.(10^4 4.0090 1.755-. 3.001: 5.50'114 3.00% 4.00"1 1.75! 3.00% 5.50% 3.00 ",'. 3011 2012 2013 2014 2015 7016 2017 2018 2019 7,OW.O(10 6,97$,867 7,258.022 7.548.343 7.850,276 8.164,287 8.490.859 8.830,493 9,183.713 1 53,000 130,000 133.900 137,917 142,055 146,316 150,706 155,1.17 159,884 ,,ISIM) 7,10.867 7,391.92-' 7,686.260 7,9!12,331 8,310.603 8.641,564 8.985.720 9,343.596 4,383.691 4,44.096 4,477.521 4.723,785 4,983.593 5,257.691 5.546.864 SAS 1.941 6.173.798 602, 324 620, 393 639, 005 658,175 677,920 639,005 658.175 677.920 698,258 541.018 557,249 573,966 591,185 608,921 627,188 646,004 665,384 685.345 368,569 393,726 454.318 467,947 481 X386 517.839 533.375 349,376 565.857 5,895,602 5.815.464 6,144.810 6,441,092 6,752,420 7,041,723 7,384,417 7,744,621 8,123,259 1.2571399 1,293,403 1,247,112 1,245,167 1,239,911 1,268,880 1,257,147 1,141,099 1,220,338 50,000 49,000 64.0:7 59,054 57,941 72,568 72,880 70,736 71,133 1 ti 4701 14.5(A) 142.5191) u0_sigh 4N.200) 11 7,6110) (10.7001 1).600) (101.4 121 183.550) 173,58$1 (62.431) (50,(m) (36.7261 (22,826) (7,863) I %3M) 114 5501 (13,250) 111,9001 (10.51101 (9,100) (7,650) 53,284) (15,340) (58) 22,054 38,810 55,620 1.145.1117 1.187,731 1,1 74,720 1,191.881 1 ~04.571 12te4,811 1.179,101 1.279.908 1,175,959 1.145.017 I,1 W7,731 1.174.720 1,191,$x3 1,204,571 1.268.82.1 1,279,201 1.779,908 1r75."$ Appendix Storm Sewer Utility Projections Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota November. 2011 City of Edina Lhility Fund. - Storm Scttrr Fund Storm Scttcr Revenue Incruase Otbcr jet enuc increase luscstmutt Rate L.Npcndrture increase Revenues Ciwrgcs for scr%iccs OWcr •• Total operating rc,cnucs .. Lxpenses Admin Operating L'spenses DcPTCCi3tion Tow( operating csPnstt Operating Income (lua) Casts flow Operating Income (loss) Dcprciiatiuil Other cll:tngcs latclgovcmmcnwl Lit •rvsl mconse Transfers Disposal orasscts Bond proceeds Debt P4ynsans: I'PH Iwmds I'M Pch P4)nwuts: 2007 hsmds PSI DeM N. uwms: 20nxA bonds 116 Dcbt p3)mcnts: 201 IA bonds 1'6 Debt (I'Sd) - 2012 Bonds Debt 01&1) - 2013 Bonds Dcbt (PSI) - 2014 Bonds Debt (1231) - 2015 U( Us Debt (1131) - 2016 Bonds Dcbl (P&I) - 2017 Bonds Debt (PSq - 2018 Bunds Dc (PSp - 2019 Bonds Capital Cash not% Beginning cus6 Eadiar cash Q -nvrly Char Lc for Singlr I•. 5.00% 5.0096 5.00".•6 1-00% 2.00% 2.0096 2.0091 2.0091 3.0056 3.00% 3.00Y 3ARY 3.0016 4.00% 3.00:1 1.75% 1.7596 1.75°„ 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 3.00;1 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.0096 3.00% Per Financial Statements Bunv ed BUJRct Fro aced 2009 2610 2011 2012 2013 20)4 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2031,318 253.909 2.400,000 2.520.000 2,646,000 2,778,3UO 2,833.866 2.890.543 2,948354 3,007,321 3,067,468 18,988 7.455 21,000 15.000 15,750 16.538 16,868 17,206 17.550 17,901 18,259 0 0 0 0 O 0 U 0 0 0 0 2,050.306 1-161,364 2.421,000 2,535.000 2,661,750 2.794.938 2.850,734 2.907.749 2.965.904 3,025.222 3,085.726 154,844 145.093 141.206 154,110 158.733 163.493 168,400 173,452 178.656 184.015 189.516 219.683 402,992 265,650 317,050 326,562 336,358 346,449 356.843 367,548 378,574 389.932 399,195 474,815 550,000 600.000 648.701 701_,340 756.257 805,851 859.226 915,371 974.414 773,722 1,022,900 964.856 1,071.160 1.133.996 1..202.194 171,106 1.336.146 1.405.430 1.477.960 1.553.882 1,276584 1..1-18.464 1.456.144 1.463,840 1,527,7.4 1592,643 1579,628 1,571,603 1.560.474 1-147.M 15,3I.64S 1.274.584 1,238,464 1.456,144 1.403.+40 1.527.754 U92.643 1.579.628 1,571,603 1,560.474 1,547_262 1.531.M5 399,195 474.815 550.WO r.t1U.000 648.701 702,340 756.257 805,851 859,226 915.371 974.414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 39.887 17,480 28,OW 27,440 33.019 42,855 49.554 38,616 33.371 44.167 42,810 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o P 6 0 P o P 0 P 0 (.595.200 2,000,000 1.0W.000 1.000.000 1.000.000 (119.830) (434.600) (432.000) (433,900) (435.200) (431,000) (431,300) (431,000) (430,10(1) (433.500) 1 (176.513) (268.488) (267,713) (266.538) (264,956) (267,862) (269,881) (270,962) (271,362) (271.362) (270.631) ( (27322) (169.850) (177,050) (174,150) (176,200) (178.150) (175,050) (176,900) (491 for 10 years) (246,582) (246,582) (246,582) (246,562) (246,582) (246.582) (246.582) (4% for 10 years) (123,291) (123.291) (123,291) (123.291) (123,291) (123291) (4% for 10 years) (123.91) (123.291) (123,291) (123,291) (123.291) (4% for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 (4156 for 10 years) 0 (1 0 14.5:. for 10 years) (126.379) (126.379) 14.5% fur 10 ycly s) 4. (4.5% for 10 ve.aQ ,'._;,.riN:61 (1.3( ^_ •'i. ':1•1 'kn!:HII) fi.�'S 114(il I, "il \,'12 \) II,i.42, X1111 11,3455771 il,i Sll' /`:31 11..11, alit 11.175,:7;1 (33:.269) 921 467.020 562,046 382.8:6 t6 =5.057) (291.693) 616.912 2.926.399 1.751.122 1 418.853 1.419.774 1.886.794 446 4.-x 2. 831.666 .1.206.(0) 1.906,916 2,523.828 2.446. 2'M 1.751.122 1.41 &853 1.419.774 1.886.794 2.448,840 1.83 1,t,66 : 206,609 1.906.916 2,523,828 2,444,290 2349,167 . Ilow 1679 18.17 P) 5S 2(1.5(. 2_139 _2 -.67 - 112 23.5} 24.05 '_4.53 25.03 Appendix E Capital Improvement Plan -Water Utility Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota November, 2011 1 4 s 6 7 e 4 10 n 12 13 U 15 16 17 I6 19 20 21 22 23 24 2s 26 27 26 29 30 31 City of Edina Utility Funds Water Fund Capital Improvements Exhibit 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Main Rehabilitatlon/Re lacement/Extensions: OJ. W 69th St and York Ave water main loo UT -10-011 $ 110,000 Well Rehabilitation/Replacement/Construction: Piping wells #5 and #'8 to WTP #5 UT -08-008 $ 100,000 Well #5 (West 69th St UT -08-009 $ 100.000 Well #12 rehab UT -09-009 $ 120,000 Well #12 rehab llf -09-010 $ 120,000 Well #9 rehab UT -10-008 $ 150.000 Well #11 rehab UT- 10-009 $ 120,000 Well #10 rehab UT -11 -006 $ 100.000 Well #8 UT -12 -006 $ 35.000 Future well rehab $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Meter Replacements/Upgrades: Water meter replacement program 1117- 10-006 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 Water Treatment Plant Rehab: Water treatment plant (#5) UT -07 -002 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 3.500,000 Water treatment plant #6 UT -07 -003 $ 3.000.000 Miscellaneous Projects: Backhoe replacement UT -03-012 $ 170,000 Braemar lead removal UT -04-005 $ 200,000 SCADA upgrade UT -09-006 $ 50,000 Vehicle replacement UT -11 -005 $ 75,000 $ 75.000 Water main improvements UT -12 -001 $ 925,000 $ 828,000 $ 805,000 $ 1,104,000 $ 726,000 PW generator UT -12 -004 $ 75,000 SCADA radio system upgrade UT -12 -007 $ 20,000 Cilywarks asset management update UT -12 -008 $ 21,000 $ 25,000 $ 10.0001$ 20,000,$ 20,000 32 TOTAL $ 4,761,000 $ 3,173,000 $ 3,775,000 $ 4,964,000 $ 1,036,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 33 34 Inflated Costs 4.00% $ 4,761,000 $ 3,299,920 $ 4,083,040 $ 5,583,825 $ 1,211,973 $ 1,216,653 $ 1,265,319 $ 1,315,932 Appendix F Capital Improvement Plan- Sanitary Sewer Utility Utility Kure Study City of Edina. Minnesota November. 2011 a r 0 e to n 12 1] U u 10 17 1s 10 20 City of Edina Utility Funds Sanitary Sewer Fund Capital Improvements Exhibit 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Main Rehabilitation/Re IacemenVExtensions: Trunk sanitary sewer lining project --9d2LL- UT -08-014 S 1.200 000 Sanitary sewer main Improvements UT -12 -002 S 790.000 $ 722.000 S 690,000 S 931.000 $ 635.000 Lift Station Rehabilitaflon/Re lacement/ConstrucUon: Lift station #8 UT -05-010 1 $ 200.000 Future lift station $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Control System Replacements/Upgrades: SCADA Upgrades UT -12 -007 $ 20.000 Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant Rehab: Miscellaneous Projects: Sewer'etter replacement UT -07 -008 $ 350.000 Manhole repair project UT- 10-010 $ 80.000 $ 80,000 $ 80.000 Annual vehicle replacement UT -11 -005 $ 70.000 . $ 50,000 $ . 50,000 S 50.000 Sewer camera and cable reel UT -11 -008 $ 30,000 30 Kw generator UT -12 -005 $ 30,000 Cityworks asset management update 1 UT -12 -008 1 $ 21.0001 $ 25,000 1 $ 10.0001$ 20,0001$ 20.0001 1 21 TOTAL $ 2,731,000 3 887,000 $ 830,000 $ 951,000 '$ 655,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 22 n Inflated Costs 4.00% $ 2,731,000 $ 922,480 $ 897,728 $ 1,069,746 $ 766,257 $ 912,490 $ 948,989 $ 986,949 (lriliry Rule Study City of Edina,- Minnesota Noiranber, 2 Q11 a 4 e City of Edina Utility Funds Storm Sewer Fund Capital Improvements Exhibit 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 1 00.000 iu TOTAL S 2,895,000 $ 1,476,000 $ 1,580,000 4 1,460,000 S 1,150,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 S . . 12 Inflated Costs 4.00% $ 2,895,000 $ 1,535,040 $ 1,708,928 $ 1,642,301 $ 1,345,337 $ 1,459,983 $ 1,518,383 $ 1,579,118 $ 1,642,283 J. # Pond and lake dredging U UT -11 -004 $ $ 1.100,000 $ $ 60,000 $ $ 120.000 Storm water lift station U UT -11 -007 S S 200,000 Storm sewer pipe and grading Improvements U UT -12 -003 $ $ 1,755,000 $ $ 1,311,000 $ $ 1,250.000 $ $ 1,440.000 $ $ 1,130,000 $ $ 1,200,000 $ $ 1,200,000 $ $ 1,200.000 $ $ 1,200,000 S SCADA radio system upgrade U UT -12 -007 $ $ 20,000 Ci orks asset management update U UT -12 -008 I I $ 20,000 $ $ 25.0001S 1 10.000,$ 2 20.000, 2 20,000 Coo er:circle pond outlet U UT -12 -009 $ $ 80,000 iu TOTAL S 2,895,000 $ 1,476,000 $ 1,580,000 4 1,460,000 S 1,150,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 S . . 12 Inflated Costs 4.00% $ 2,895,000 $ 1,535,040 $ 1,708,928 $ 1,642,301 $ 1,345,337 $ 1,459,983 $ 1,518,383 $ 1,579,118 $ 1,642,283 Appendix H PrnnnSPci 2012 Residential Rates and Tiers Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Not - ember, 2011 Usage Range Rates Water Usage Residential Tier One 0 -35 units $1.24 Tier Two 36 -65 units $1.64 Tier Three Over 65 units $2.58 Commercial Tier One 0 -35 units $1.24 Tier Two 36 -65 units $1.64 Tier Three Over 65 units $1.64 Morningside All usage Residential and Commercial $2.46 Irri ation- Commercial Tier One 0 -35 units $1.64 Tier Two Over 35 units 1$2.58 Sewer Usage Res and Commercial To 16 units $49.25 Over 16 units $3.08 Based on winter quarter use Storm Sewer Based on residential equivalent units $20.56 Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Not - ember, 2011 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. WS VI From: Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director ❑ Action ® Discussion ❑ Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Review Draft 2012 HRA Operating Budget Recommendation: See attached budget information for discussion at the worksession. No formal action is expected. Info /Background: Please find attached all the materials you will need for the discussion. v�t�AA, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA e a, . f o OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET HRA FUND The HRA was established in 1974 for the purpose of undertaking urban redevelopment projects and assisting with the development of affordable housing. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the City. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of the City's operations because the members of the City Council serve as HRA board members and its activity is confined to the City of Edina. The HRA has been the driving force behind the 50"' and France commercial area renewal, as well as the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes mixed development projects. The special revenue HRA fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (tax increments, bond proceeds, investment earnings, etc.) that are designated for housing and redevelopment. Due to the involvement of tax increment (TIF) dollars, there are legal restrictions on how the money in this fund may be spent. -128- �4 t�`A CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA `� G J ch OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS ANNUAL BUDGET December 31 fund balance $11,326,798 $13,324,697 $15,800,583 $11,800,583 $13,854,538 $13,538,158 The HRA fund had a fund balance of $13,324,697 as of December 31, 2010. The City intends to use this money to pay TIF debt service costs as well as to finance future infrastructure improvements. Most recently, the HRA fund paid for improvements to. the Edina Promenade.' Two TIF districts, 50th & France and Edinborough, decertified in 2009. and another district, Grandview, decertified in 2010. This leaves Centennial Lakes as the only district to continue to generate TIF revenue in 2011 and beyond, and is the reason why tax increment revenue declined in 2010 and 2011. The Centennial Lakes district decertifies in 2016. Also, one new FTE employee is proposed to be added to the HRA fund beginning in 2012. —129— 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Proposed Proposed Revenues Tax increments $ 7,587,386 $ 4,488,073 $ 3,972,190 .,'$ 3,972,190 $ 3,980,000 $ 3,990,000 Investment income 183,592 207,464 133,000 133,000 118;000 139,000 Total revenues 7,770,978 4,695,537 4,105,190 4,105,190 41098;000 4,129,000 Expenditures and other financing uses Personal services 28,377 21,812 20,771 20,771 171,600 175,030 Contractual services 1,603,607 1,529,077 674,174 674,174 694,000 711,000 Capital outlay 2,215,633 215,929 - 4,000,000 3,200,000 3,000,000 Transfers 6,134,236 930,820 934,359 934,359 1,978,445 559,350 Total expenditures 9,981,853 2,697,638 1,629,304 5,629,304 6,044,045 4,445,380 Change in fund balance (2,210,875) 1,997,899 2,475,886 (1,524,114) (1,946,045) (316,380) January 1 fund balance 13,537,673 11,326,798 13,324,697 13,324,697 15,800,583 13,854,538 December 31 fund balance $11,326,798 $13,324,697 $15,800,583 $11,800,583 $13,854,538 $13,538,158 The HRA fund had a fund balance of $13,324,697 as of December 31, 2010. The City intends to use this money to pay TIF debt service costs as well as to finance future infrastructure improvements. Most recently, the HRA fund paid for improvements to. the Edina Promenade.' Two TIF districts, 50th & France and Edinborough, decertified in 2009. and another district, Grandview, decertified in 2010. This leaves Centennial Lakes as the only district to continue to generate TIF revenue in 2011 and beyond, and is the reason why tax increment revenue declined in 2010 and 2011. The Centennial Lakes district decertifies in 2016. Also, one new FTE employee is proposed to be added to the HRA fund beginning in 2012. —129— F /I AGENDA ' CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 1, 2011 . 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of October 18; 2011, Work Session of October 18, 2011 B. Receive Payment Of Claims 'As Per: Pre -List Dated 10/20/2011, TOTAL $721,839.29; Pre -List Dated, 10/27/2011, TOTAL $4,267,233.99 and Credit Card Transactions Dated 8/26/11- 9/26/11 TOTAL $7,363.90 C. Resolution No. 2011 -111 Lot Division 5023 and 5025 Nob Hill Drive, Eva May D. Engineering Services For Richmond Hills, Park Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction E. Engineering Services for Tracy Avenue From Benton Avenue To Vernon Avenue F. Resolution No. 2011 -113 Certifying Special Assessment For Galleria Entrance G. Edina Community Foundation Designated Fund Agreement H. Covenant Regarding Maintenance of Yard For 7100 Ohms Lane I. Traffic Safety Report of October 5, 2011 Agenda/Edina City Council . November 1, 2011 Page 2 V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the,same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda `may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council.might refer the matter to: staff for consideration at a future meeting. V1. 1. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable,. vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No.. 2011 -112 Accepting,Various Donations B. Neighborhood, Identification, Public Engagement Process C. Approve Grant Application To Hennepin County For "Open to Business" Program „VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Receive Petition Against Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project B: Correspondence Received From The Minnesota Restaurant Association C. Correspondence. Received Since Last Meeting IX.. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS X. MANAGER'S COMMENTS A. City Council Member E -mail Protocol Tues Tues Tues Fri Mon Tues Tues Thur Fri Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon 2012 Mon Tues ')n es Tues Mon Tues Agenda /Edina City Council November 1, 2011 Page 3 B. Proposed France Avenue Pedestrian Bridge XI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in'the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES %EVENT �.._._... r. .. r Nov 1 Draft 2012 Budget and Capital Improvement Plan Review 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Draft Utility Rate Study Nov 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 8 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Nov 11 VETERAWS DAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed, Nov 14 Retirement Party — Ceil Smith 3:00 — 5:00 P.M. CITY HALL FOYER Nov 15 Draft 2012 Budget Review 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 24 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Nov 25 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Dec 6 , Work Session — Economic Development Proposal & 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 50`h & France Business Area Improvements Dec 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 20 Work Session — Recodification 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 26 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jan 2 NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jan 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Jan 16 REV. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Jan 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Feb 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Feb 20 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Feb 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 18, 2011 7:10 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. U. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of October 4, 2011, and town hall meeting minutes of October 1, 2011. IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 6, 2011, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $424,046.64; Communications Fund $11,296.00; Police Special Revenue $45.24; PIR Debt Service Fund $2,365.00; Working Capital Fund $36,622.93; Equipment Replacement Fund $1-4,813.10; Art Center Fund $3,651.72; Golf Dome Fund $1,096.15; Aquatic Center Fund $64,754.75; Golf Course Fund $17,869.72; Ice Arena Fund $1,399.19; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $18,880.00; Liquor Fund $92,461.75; Utility Fund $18,890.97; Storm Sewer Fund $21,753.68; PSTF Agency Fund $7,977.21; Payroll Fund $3,085.67; TOTAL $741.009.72 and for approval of payment of claims dated October 13, 2011, and consisting of 32 pages; General Fund $339,997.85; Communications Fund $942.36; City Hall Debt Service $900.00; Working Capital Fund $210,795.81; Equipment Replacement Fund $7,111.90; Art Center Fund $5,863.27; Golf Dome Fund $313.77; Aquatic Center Fund $46,611.48; Golf Course Fund $13,630.72; Ice Arena Fund $27,565.71; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $26,859.17; Liquor Fund $369,885.15; Utility Fund $417.922.71; Storm Sewer Fund $9,260.70; Recycling Fund $3.33; PSTF Agency Fund $4,214.97; TOTAL $1.481.878.90. IV.C. Approve 2012 meeting and holiday schedule. IV.D. Request for Purchase, Vehicle Wash Heater, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Boiler Services, Inc. at $26,120.00. IV.I. Award Bid Contract, Website Redesign, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, JesseJames Creative at $104,500. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. AMERICA'S PROMISE AWARD PRESENTED Heather Haen Anderson, Executive Director of Edina's Connecting with Kids, presented the America's Promise Award, noting Edina had been selected as one of America's best 100 communities by America's Promise Alliance for the second consecutive year. Ms. Haen Anderson introduced Julie Rogers Bascom, Edina Public Schools Service Learning Coordinator; Arrie Larsen Manti, President, Edina Chamber of Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18, 2011 Commerce; and Dick Crockett, Executive Director, Edina Community Foundation and thanked all who played a part in this program. Vl. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD VI.A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, WOLD ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERERS/EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 4725 SOUTH VIEW LANE — RESOLUTION NO. 2011-96 ADOPTED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request of Edina Public Schools to build a 5,600 sq. ft., two -story addition to the South View Middle School located at 4725 South View Lane. The addition would include a new kitchen and various classroom spaces and be set back 117 feet from the front property line along Concord Avenue. It was noted the exterior of the addition would match the existing building. Mr. Teague advised of consideration by staff and the Planning Commission and recommended approval of this request subject to the conditions as detailed in the draft resolution. Proponent Presentation Steve Bristor, Edina Public Schools Buildings and Grounds Supervisor, explained a study was completed to create a long -range plan. The plan identified that South View Middle School needed more space for education. The proposed project would create five new classrooms and cafeteria space. The Council discussed the project, noting the school was conditionally permitted in an R -1 district, and the proposed project would require no setback variances. With regard to landscaping, Mr. Bristor advised that several trees located at the entrance would be relocated elsewhere on the site, and the building would be constructed as identified on the materials board. The Council asked about the area where children wait for parent pickup. Nick Marcucci, Wold Architects, stated the area in question was designated on the plan as a plaza area and would be covered with an overhang. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -96; approving Conditional Use Permit at 4725 South View Lane for Edina Public Schools, based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E., of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The addition addresses building space needs at the school. And subject to the following conditions: 1. If necessary, approval of the site work from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Plans may be revised per conditions of the Watershed District. 2. A building permit must be obtained within two years of City Council approval. 3. The addition must be built per the building materials board, including colors, presented at the City Council meeting on October 18, 2011. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18, 2011 VI. B. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.8.1 TREE REMOVAL —IMPROVEMENT NO. TR-11 —RESOLUTION NO. 2011-97 ADOPTED Park and Recreation Director Keprios presented Code Section 1055 that calls for the removal of trees with Dutch elm or oak wilt disease. He described the process used by the City Forester to identify diseased trees, notification to the property owner, and options to the property owner to remove and dispose of the tree or have that work done by the City's contractor. Mr. Keprios presented the assessments roll for nine properties to be assessed for tree removal plus an administrative fee. Park Maintenance Superintendent Cockriel reported oak wilt and Dutch elm disease was slightly below last year, and`ash borer had not been spotted in Edina. This year, 320 to 340 diseased trees had been removed with about half on private property. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -97, levying special assessments for Improvement No. TR -11 Tree Trimming. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.8.2 AQUATIC WEEDS —IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-11 —RESOLUTION NO. 2011-98 ADOPTED Mr. Keprios explained this assessment was for the aquatic weed control service that was City administered upon request by homeowners. He displayed the areas of improvement and presented the assessment roll for 33 Indianhead Lake properties to be assessed $388.20 per home for a total of $12,810.39; 37 Arrowhead Lake properties to be assessed $404.05 per home for a total of $14,949.62; and, 63 Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond properties to be assessed $189 per home for a total of $11,883.00.1i was noted the City's share in the Minnehaha Creek Mill. Pond assessment was $1,500. The Council asked if the homeowner associations had been made aware of grant opportunities in partnership with the Watershed District: Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle stated staff would talk with the Watershed liaison regarding that matter. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Public Testimony Mark Sparano, 4905 Sunnyslope Road E., addressed the Council and stated support to maintain this stellar program. Mr. Cockriel indicated quotes were solicited from the limited number of area firms and Lake Weed Harvesting of Minnetonka was hired. He stated this firm had been used for several years and described the scheduling for aquatic weed removal at the Mill Pond. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18, 2011 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -98, levying special assessments for Improvement No. AQ -11 Aquatic Weeds. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V1.8.3 WEED MOWING —IMPROVEMENT NO. WD -11— RESOLUTION NO. 2011-99 ADOPTED Mr. Keprios explained the Code's requirement for maintenance of vegetation and the process used by the City's Weed Inspector to notify the property owner to comply. If compliance was not gained, the weeds were cut by Park Maintenance staff and the cost assessed. Mr. Keprios presented the assessments roll for one property to be assessed $187.50 and two properties to be assessed $150.00, which would be certified to the County Assessor for collection. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -99, levying special assessments for Improvement No. ED -11 Weed Mowing. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V1.8.4 50TH & FRANCE MAINTENANCE — IMPROVEMENT NO. M -11 — RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -100 ADOPTED Mr. Houle stated the next nine public hearings related to projects that improved the City's infrastructure peF in accord with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 429 authorizing special assessment of benefitting properties and were in compliance with the City's Assessment Policy. He summarized the options available to property owners for payment of assessments. Mr. Houle noted the City's Assessment Policy allowed for a ten -year term for local road construction with this year's interest set at 4.3% and a one -year term for maintenance district improvements at 6.5% interest. Mr. Houle explained that if assessments were approved, a statement would be sent to the property owners that explained payment options. Mr. Houle presented the assessments roll for properties within the 50`h and France maintenance area that would be assessed $0.6203 per square foot, noting this rate was lower than assessed the previous year. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18, 2011 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -100, Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvement. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B.S GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT MAINTENANCE — IMPROVEMENT NO. G -I1 — RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -101 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the assessments roll for properties within the Grandview Business District to be assessed $0.0321 per square foot, which was lower than assessed in the previous year. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. Public Testimonv No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -101, levying special assessments for public improvement. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B.6 BRAEMAR HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO.BA -359 — RESOLUTION NO. 2011-102 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the costs for the Braemar Hills neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $602,885.53 or $6,724.13 per Residential Equivalent Unit. Two lots off Valley View Road would be assessed one -third REU per the Special Assessment Policy. It was noted this assessment was 26.52% lower than the estimated assessment of $9,150.82. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -102, levying special assessments for public improvement. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18, 2011 VI.B.7 PAMELA PARK NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION —IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -360 —RESOLUTION NO. 2011-103 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the costs for the Pamela Park neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $1,154,227.95 or $5,343.65 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 40.9% lower than the estimated assessment of $9,041.67. The City's contribution for its 29 REUs would be $154,965.79. The Council recognized the remarkable reductions from estimated costs over actual costs. Mr. Houle advised the cost savings was due to receipt of competitive bids; however, prices for 2011 projects had increased. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Public Testimonv No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -103, levying special assessments for public improvement. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B.8 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -361 — RESOLUTION NO. 2011-104 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented costs for the Interlachen Circle neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $136,106.21 or $7,561.46 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 16.67% lower than the estimated assessment of $9,074.24. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. Public Testimonv No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made .a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -104, levying special assessments for public improvement. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B.9 PARKWOOD KNOLLS NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -362 — RESOLUTION NO. 2011-105 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the costs for the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $871,134.78 or $10,801.42 per REU. Properties abutting Schaefer Road would be assessed one -third REU per the City's Special Assessment Policy. It was noted this assessment was 18.88% lower than the estimated assessment of $13,314.55. Page 6 J Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18, 2011 The Council noted the staff report indicated there were 80.65 assessable units and five at one -third REU so there were actually 80.66 assessable units. Mr. Houle acknowledged that was a typo and could be corrected. This change would result in a reduction from $10,801.42 per REU to $10,800.08 per REU. Mr. Knutson advised this change could be approved tonight and staff would correct the statements sent to property owners. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:01 p.m. Public Testimonv No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -105, levying special assessments for public improvement, as revised to reflect 80.66 assessable units at $10,800.08 per REU, and direct staff to prepare and send appropriate statement to property owners. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B.10INTERLACHEN BLUFF NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -374 — RESOLUTION NO. 2011-106 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the costs for the Interlachen Bluff neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $74,892.19 or $9,361.52 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 17.51% lower than the estimated assessment of $11,349.01. Mr. Houle explained the tall antenna facilitated monitoring of the sanitary lift station. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -106, levying special assessments for public improvement. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B.11 BROR ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -375 — RESOLUTION NO. 2011-107 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the costs for the Bror Road neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $24,165.56 or $4,833.11 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 46.75% lower than the estimated assessment of Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18, 2011 1. $9,077.04. Mr. Houle indicated staff had looked at this large reduction and found the project had contained a large contingency in case any of the unit costs increased. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:08 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -107, levying special assessments for public improvement. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B.12 MOCCASIN VALLEY ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION — IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -376 — RESOLUTION NO. 2011-108 ADOPTED Mr. Houle presented the costs for the Moccasin Valley Road neighborhood reconstruction project totaling $73,082.38 or $6,643.85 per REU. It was noted this assessment was 40.8% lower than the estimated assessment of $11,222.27. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -108, levying special assessments for public improvement. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Houle extended his appreciation to City Engineer Sullivan, City staff, and the consultants, noting a large number of reconstruction projects had been undertaken, yet no property owner had appeared during the public hearings to voice concerns. The Council added their appreciation and acknowledged this was the result of engaging citizenry, providing clear communication, and a high level of customer service by staff and the contractors. VI.0 CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITIES —IMPROVEMENT NO. DU -11— RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 109 ADOPTED Finance Director Wallin presented certification of delinquent utilities per Minnesota Statute 444.075 and City Code. He described the notification process for utility accounts with balances over $50 and delinquent 30 days or longer. It was noted customers had opportunity to pay overdue balances up until November 18, 2011. A $30 administrative fee would be added and assessed for one year at 6.5% interest. Mr. Wallin explained the assessment roll included nine Edina properties that received St. Louis Park utility service and Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18.2011 one Edina property that received Richfield utility services pursuant-to agreements between the cities. The assessment roll does not include three accounts totaling $122,437.14 that were authorized to be certified in May of 2011. Mr. Wallin advised that these three properties had made payment per the agreement reached. He stated that'in September, 676 properties were notified of delinquent balance, totaling $314,954. Mr. Wallin indicated the final delinquent list would be attached t0 the draft resolution and sent to the'County for certification. The Council discussed the number of delinquent accounts and asked questions of staff.. Mr. Wallin advised the delinquent accounts were predominantly residential with a few commercial and estimated 85 -90% of delinquencies were paid within one year of being certified. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:22 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -109, authorizing the certification of delinquent utility charges to the Hennepin County Auditor. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: " Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT Bill Glahn, 6634 Normandale Road, introduced himself and gave his professional credentials. Mr. Glahn urged the Council to use skepticism during its deliberations of Green Step programs, a Pollution Control Agency.program without statutory authority, because he believed such programs were voluntary and not thoroughly vetted in science. Raymond E. O'Connell, 4612 Valley View Road, asked the City to update Braemar Trail, described the area's natural attributes, and noted the northern corner needed greater pedestrian amenities such as a ,boardwalk pireterettiReinil. Mr. O'Connell complimented the City on the recently completed street projects. Vlll. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-110 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable .votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of. Resolution. No. 2011 -110 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried.. VIII.B. RECEIVE BUSINESS PLANS: BRAEMAR ARENA, GOLF COURSE, AND EDINA ART CENTER Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, receiving the 2010 -2011 *enterprise business plans for Braemar Arena, Golf Course, and Edina Art Center. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 18, 2011 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received The Council discussed the request of the Human Rights and Relations Commission to celebrate diversity. It was suggested, due to budget and time constraints, to also engage the Edina Community Foundation and pursue this celebration as part of the Fourth of July parade event. The Council discussed whether the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program, which was adopted in 2005 but has never been used, bye- neighbeFh8ed, should be reviewed by the ETC for its use, revision, or elimination. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to refer the correspondence relating to the City erected fence at Browndale Park to the Park Board for review and recommendations as to we4 as communication with and the desired role of neighborhood park associations and donations. The Council acknowledged this fence was erected in response to an accident so it should not be presumed the intention was to remove the fence. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, correcting the 2012 Council meeting dates and holidays, designating November 5, 2012, as the Council meeting date rather than November 1, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received Xll. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 1, 2011. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the October 18, 2011, meeting available. Page 10 MINUTES OF THE WORS SESSION EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL OCTOBER 18, 2011 S:3S P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. in the Community Room of Edina City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague entered the meeting at 5:40 p.m. Staff attending the meeting included: Todd Anderson; Braemar Golf Course Manager; Doug Bauman, Rink Operations Manager; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director; Michael Frey, Interim Edina Art Center Director; John Keprios, Director of Parks & Recreation; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Susie Miller, Braemar Arena Manager; Scott Neal, City Manager; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; and John Wallin, Finance Director. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the work session was to review the 2012 Enterprise Budgets and 2012- 2016 Capital Improvement Plans for Braemar Arena, the Golf Course and Edina Art Center. The Council reviewed the following Enterprise Budgets, 2012 -2016 Capital Improvement Plans and Business Plans: Braemar Arena, Braemar Golf Course and the Edina Art Center. Staff responded to the Council questions for each enterprise. Concerns were expressed regarding the level of subsidy of some enterprises. Council directed the Braemar Arena General Manager to begin selling dasher board advertising in one arena, evaluate the sale of dasher board advertising in the other two arenas, and work with the Edina Hockey Association to transition operation of the concessions stand back to the City. The Golf Course Manager was directed to continue working on plans for capital improvements, including reconfiguration of the driving range and construction of cart paths. The interim Art Center director was asked to re- examine programming at the facility. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 1, 2011 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page- 1 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 832.80 TEMP HELP 273027 34070002 CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 832.80 352408 10/2012011 Council Check Register 105262 ALEX AIR'APPARATUS INC. 10/20/2011 — 10/20/2011 51,677.38 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description . 352404 1012012011 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 352409 1012012011 949.93 EXERCISE EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 273316 21- 031197 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 949.93 RECYCLING 273375 2666195 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 352405 1012012011 129616 7000 SANDELL CONDO 754.55 SPRINKLER REPAIR 273232 00008323 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 754.55 ' - 1,162.43, RESEED PROMENADE 00002385 273288 352406 1012012011 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 100613 - AAA 1,162.43 601.00 PLATES FOR 26 -166 273233 101211 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 601.00 352407 10120/2011 FOOD - - 273234 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page- 1 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 832.80 TEMP HELP 273027 34070002 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 832.80 352408 10/2012011 105262 ALEX AIR'APPARATUS INC. 51,677.38 HURST TOOLS 00003627 273138 20572 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 51,677.38 352409 1012012011 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 38,820.60 RECYCLING 273375 2666195 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 38,820.60 - 352410 1012012011 119976 AP LAWN ' - 1,162.43, RESEED PROMENADE 00002385 273288 CTLKPK -0911 5650.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE 1,162.43 352411 1012012011 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 674.60. FOOD - - 273234 1630455 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 632.92 FOOD 273317 1633693 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,307.52 352412 1012012011 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 410.91 COFFEE 273318 421434 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 410.91 352413 10/20/2011 124846 ASSEMBLED PRODUCTS'C_ORPORATION 88.82 KODIAK REPAIR/USB HUB 273139 643957 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 88.82 352414 10120/2011 126019 B 8, B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register: BATTERY TECHKITS 00001959 Page - 2 018- 246611 5916.6406 10/20/2011 - 10/20/2011 105.77 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger- Account Description Business Unit 173.14 REPLACED SIREN SPEAKER 273140 3606 1400.6215 - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 173.14 273166 70372900 5642.5513 352415 1012012011 129624 BARNA GUZY S STEFFEN LTD-. 273167 70342900 272.00 CONSULTING FEES 273289 093011 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 272.00 5642.5513 297.60 352416 1012012011 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 105.77 BATTERY TECHKITS 00001959 273028 018- 246611 5916.6406 105.77 352417 1012012011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,216.60 273166 70372900 5642.5513 208.65 273167 70342900 5662.5513- '488.53 273379 70457700 5642.5513 297.60 273380 70468000 5862.5512 675.35 273381 70469400 5862.5512 12.65 273382 85878800 5842.6406 149.51 273383 85878700 - 5862.5515 3,050.89 352418 1012012011 127986 BERGMAN, MARGE 40.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 273235 101311 1280.6107 40.80 352419 1012012011 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 68.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 273236 0E- 260237 -1 1140.6106 40.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 273237 _ OE- 258265 -1 1628.6513 112.19 INK CARTRIDGES 273319 WO- 697317 -1 = - 1550.6406 51.27 ENVELOPES, 273320 WO- 723909 -1 1550.6406 63.16 STENO BOOK_ S, PADS 273321 WO- 724132 -1 1550.6406. 16.02 DISKETTES 273322 WO- 724172 -1 1550.6406 14.94 INKER BOTTLES 273323 WO- 724797 -1 1550.6406 44.84 ENVELOPES 273324 W0- 726063 -1 1550.6406 410.64 i GENERAL SUPPLIES METER,READING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE- SUPERVISION 8 OVERHEAD MEETING EXPENSE OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING.. SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL. CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 352420 1012012011 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 29.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 273100 71740 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 106.83 COPY PAPER 00001437 273101 71761 ,1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 213.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 273238 71441 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 350.44 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/20/2011 — 10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 352421 1012012011 124468 BOEHM'S CYCLE 53.51 TIRE TUBES, TIRE LEVER 273290 190472 1400.6406 53.51 352422 1012012011 119631 BONNER & BORHART-LLP 15,862.50 PROSECUTING 273239 55280 1195.6103 15,862.50 352423 10120/2011 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 484.50 273168 105175 5862.5513 484.50 352424 10120/2011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 841.23 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005137 273029 175987 1553.6180 841.23 352425 10/2012011 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 5.43 PETTY CASH 273325 101411 5440.6122 12.69 PETTY CASH 273325 101411 5440.6406 44.00 PETTY CASH 273325 101411 5410.6235 98.00 PETTY CASH 273325 101411 5410.6105 126.43 PETTY CASH 273325 101411 5422.6275 - 286.55 352426 1012012011 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC: 11041.50 MATERIALS TESTING 273102 340591 01355.1705.21 880.50 273103 340589 01334.1705.21 413.25 273104 340588 01373.1705.21 995.25 273105 340590 01370.1705.21 3,409.50 273106 340373 01381.1705.21 8,001.25. MATERIALS TESTING 273240 340366 01383.1705.21 . 5,706.50 273241 340363 01367.1705.21 20,447.75 352427 10120/2011 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 60.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTO- - .. 273326 1089 2210.6123 60.00. - 352428 1012012011 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 106.60 MERCHANDISE 273327 :1001890805 5440.5511 - 106.60 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES POSTAGE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COURSE BEAUTIFICATION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING ,INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION 10/1912011 7:55:50 Page- 3 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ' PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE $ GROUNDS BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS RECON BA- 370 'CARSONS HILL RECON BA -381 MALONEY AVE BA -383 W44TH ST BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE, COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 352433 1012012011 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 12.82 19.23 22.95 23.59 24.05 37.59 45.96 64.13 71.37 80.07 90.32 107.16 208.97 275.41 325.70 1,081.63 Subledger Account Description DATA PROCESSING 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page - 4 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 273172 91518 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 273030 100411 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 273030 100411 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 273030 100411 Council Check Register HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 273030 100411 5430.6186 10/20/2011 - 1012012011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 352429 10120/2011 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSIO 100411 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,920.00 CJDN CONNECTION, MOTS 273291 00000033638 1400.6160 273030 100411 1,920.00 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 273030 100411 352430 1012012011 DISTRIBUTION 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 100411 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 273030 222.87 MERCHANDISE 273107 922499192 5440.5511 100411 1646.6186 222.87 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 273030 100411 1628.6186 352431 10/2012011 273030 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 5911.6186 ' HEAT WELL PUMPS 273030 100411 3,942.85 HEAT 273169 980878 5842.5514 33.50 273170 980879 5842.5515 520.00 273384 981822 5842.5514 707.50 273385 980876 5822.5514 32.30 273386 980877 5822.5515 5,236.15 352432 1012012011 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 352433 1012012011 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 12.82 19.23 22.95 23.59 24.05 37.59 45.96 64.13 71.37 80.07 90.32 107.16 208.97 275.41 325.70 1,081.63 Subledger Account Description DATA PROCESSING 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page - 4 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 273172 91518 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 273030 100411 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 273030 100411 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 273030 100411 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 273030 100411 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 273030 100411 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 273030 100411 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 273030 100411 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 273030 100411 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 273030 100411 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 273030 100411 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 273030 100411 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 273030 100411 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 273030 100411 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 273030 100411 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 273030 100411 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 273030 100411 5911.6186 ' HEAT WELL PUMPS 273030 100411 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 352434 1012012011 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 1.124.90 273292 2266172 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10120/2011 _ 10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 51.80 273293 2266652 5311.6186 HEAT 10119/2011 7:55:50 Page- 5 Business Unit: POOL OPERATION j 1,176.70 352435 1012012011 123898 CENTURYLINK ' 606.52 612 E01 -0426 273031 0426 -10/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 18.90 651281-1355 8001311 273032 1311 -10/11 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.75 952 926 -0092 " 273033 0092 -10111 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 527.96 612 E01 -8392 -, 273034 8392 -10/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ` 528.51 612 E24 -8657 273035 8657 -10/11 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 296.84 612 E24 -8656 273036 - 8656 -10/11 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 606.52 612 E12 -0797 `" 273037 6797 -10/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 121:92 952 926 -0419 273038 0419 -10/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 200.76 952 835 -6661 273108 6661 -10/11 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 104.66 952 835 -1161 273109 1161 -10/11 5620.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH PARK " 104.80 612 E23-0652 273141 0652 -10/11 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 151.48 952 285 -2951 273371 2951 -10111 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.60 952 9441841 273372 1841 - 10/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,384.22 352436 1012012011 129628 CHAMPION WINDOWS - 31.00 PERMIT REFUND 273328 ED109706 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 31.00 352437 10/2012011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 357.75 273171 456792 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 357.75 362438 1012012011 122084 CITY OF EDINA - .UTILITIES 1,303.95 00113607- 0342163045 273142 342163045-8/11 1470.6189 SEWER 8 WATER FIRE DEPT..GENERAL 619.31' 00082050- 0200650009 273329 200650009 -10/11 1551.6189 SEWER 8 WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 1,931.37 00052050- 0200650018 273330 200650018 - 10/11 1551.6189 SEWER 8 WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 3,854.63 352439 1012012011 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 196.20 " 273387 0148023812 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 196.20 352440 1012012011 120433 COMCAST 1.53 273110 23973 -10/11 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 2.98. 273110 23973 -10/11 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 59.00 8772,10 614 0199138 273242 199138 -9/11 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 91.05 8772 10 614 0220686 273331 220686 -10111 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK j R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 6 10/20/2011 - 10120/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 154.56 352441 10/2012011 117348 CONBOY, DAN 362.63 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 273143 100911 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 362.63 352442 1012012011 129617 COPPIN SEWER AND WATER 93.84 PERMIT REFUND 273243 ED110007 1495.4114 HEATING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 93.84 352443 1012012011 123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE 11,969.00 WALGREENS SIDEWALK 00001078 273244 100111 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 11,969.00 352444 10120/2011 129625 CSHS 150.00 TRAINING CONFERENCE 273294 NOV 10 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 352445 1012012011 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 58.28 114 - 09855685 -4 WATER 273295 100111 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 58.28 352446 1012012011 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 455.96 COIL, WIRE 00006091 273245 155113 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 455.96 352447 1012012011 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 321.33 METER PARTS 00001997 273111 7071036 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 37.94 METER PARTS 00001997 273112 7073826 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 359.27 352448 10120/2011 104020 DALCO 104.25 WINDEX 00006330 273332 2384868 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 104.25 352449 1012012011 102285 DAVANNIS 53.53 FOOD FOR TRAINING 273144 208439 1400.61D4 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 29.33 273145 208435 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 82.86 352450 10/2012011 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 183.64 DAIRY 273246 100311 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/20117:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 7 10/20/2011 -10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No . Subledger Account Description Business Unit 183.64 352451 1012012011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,516.82 273173 621556 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 273174 621557 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 154.20 273388 622293 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 273389 621553 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 941.75 273390 621554 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19.20 273391 621555 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,131.60 273462 621552 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,853.17 352452 10/2012011 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 114.93 BAKERY 273247 385368 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 40.29 BAKERY 273333 385768 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - GRILL 155.22 352453 10120/2011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 123.35 110311867 273334 110311867 -9/11 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 146:75 650487671. 273335 650487671 -10/11 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 272.10 352454 10/2012011 123162 DISH NETWORK 52.40 8255 7070 8142 2839 273296 100411 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY .. 52.40 352455 1012012011 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 614.39 MAILING 273113 4375 -01 01238.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 614.39 352456 10/20/2011 129602 DS SOLUTIONS INC. 116.63 ELECTION SUPPLIES': 273039 10341 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 116.63 352457 10/20/2011 129620 EASTON, MCKENNA 50.00 HEAD CLINICIAN - VOLLEYBALL 273248 101311 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 50.00 352458 10/20/2011 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 197.39 SEPT WASHES 273146 4806 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.39 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 10/20/2011 -10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352459 10120/2011 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 937.06 ARTS IN THE PARK 273366 101111 5840.8070 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 937.06 352460 1012012011 103594 EDINALARM INC. 135.00 REPLACE MOTION SENSOR 273249 69216 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 135.00 352461 1012012011 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 1,975.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 273114 62093 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 5,082.50 UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS 273147 343564 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 190.00 SOUTHDALE REMODEL 273148 343563 100D.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 7,247.50 352462 1012012011 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 467.06 BULBS, SEALS, BACKUP LAMPS 00005422 273115 175682 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 467.06 352463 1012012011 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 463.84 CONCRETE CASTINGS 00001800 273040 002972 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 463.84 352464 1012012011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 126.40 (BATTERY - 00005304 273367 6M44492 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.40 352465 10/2012011 124245 FARMER BROS. CO. 308.06 COFFEE 273041 55348846 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 308.06 352466 10/2012011 129614 FAS- LITTON UTILITIES 5.06 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 273250 4116 W 62ND ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 5.06 352467 10120/2011 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 363.54 PARKING SIGNS 00.002370 273297 131200004073 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 363.54 352468 1012012011 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 311.92 273392 3169 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 311.92 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/20/2011 - 10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 352469 10120/2011 102727 FORCE AMERICA 412.30 TRANSMITTER 00005425 273042 01371748 1553.6530. REPAIR PARTS 10/19/20117:55:50 Page- 9 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1260.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ENGINEERING GENERAL 5511.6201 LAUNDRY 412.30 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 352470 10/20/2011 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA,' LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 281.03 CONFERENCE'EXPENSES 273149 101111 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 281.03 . REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 352471 1012012011 MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS 100764 - G & K SERVICES_ REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 91.63 1470.6188 273043 093011 ' ADVERTISING OTHER' 91.65 5912.6406 273043 093011 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.41 273043 093011 97.00 273043 093011 109.27 273043 09301ti 198.80 273043 093011 315.64 273043 093011 989.40 352472 1012012011 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 52.60 AUTO PARTS 273251 093011 17918 AUTO PARTS 273251 093011 - 400.61 AUTO PARTS 273251 093011 632.99 352.473 1012012011 127515 GILGENBACH, JORDAN 232.43 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 273463 101711 232.43 352474 1012012011 118941 'GLOBALSTAR'USA 29.05 R -91 PHONE 273150 3362796 29.05 - 352475 10120/2011 122315 'G0360MEDIA' ' \ 225.00 VIRTUAL TOUR REVISION - -00006371 273336 VTO11 -13 225.00 352476 1012012011 101103 GRAINGER;_ 84.26. THERMOSTAT 00001962 273044 9649106342 235.78' EAR PLUGS 273298 9658669529 320.04 352477 10/20/2011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 10/19/20117:55:50 Page- 9 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1260.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ENGINEERING GENERAL 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER' GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE R55CKREG COG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 10 10/20/2011 — 10120/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 642.25 273175 132275 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING CONSULTING INSPECTION CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 642.25 352478 10120/2011 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 1,925.58 GAS HEAT EXCHANGER 273045 BLM0142795 5841.6215 1,925.58 352479 1012012011 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 5,101.39 PREMIUM 273136 56101744 9900.2033.05 9.50 COBRA BASIC LIFE 273137 NOV2011 1550.6043 5,110.89 352480 1012012011 100800 HEDGES, DIANA 71.47 REIMBURSEMENT 273337 101411 5110.6564 396.39 REIMBURSEMENT 273337 101411 5110.6107 417.86 352481 10120/2011 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 431.00 273252 1710765 5421.5510 431.00 352482 1012012011 117186 HELGREN, ADAM 100.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273299 101211 5630.6201 100.00 352483 1012012011 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 307.80 REMODELING 273338 480431 1551.6103 307.80 352484 10120/2011 127282 HEUN ENTERPRISES INC. 184.50 273395 3146 5822.5512 184.50 352485 1012012011 101102 HIDDEN FENCE OF MINNESOTA 184.00 REPAIRS AT 4703 GOLF TERRACE 273253 11- 0921 - 0507 -43 01355.1705.21 184.00 352486 1012012011 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 140.31 FLOOR PADS, DISPENSERS 00002218 273339 6936121 5620.6511 608.79 TOWELS, SOAP 00002214 273340 6926380 5620.6511 749.10 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING CONSULTING INSPECTION CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 11 10/20/2011 -10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352487 10/2012011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 853.00 273176 576154 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 728.50 273393 576466 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 467.00 273394 576363 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,048.50 352488 1012012011 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 1,152.63 POWER MODULES, FIELD SERVICE00001995 273046 4823 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 1,152.63 352489 10/2012011 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 63.87 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS 00001907 273047 675164 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 63.87 352490 1012012011 129619 INGERSOLL -RAND COMPANY 838.31 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005142 273254 30218135 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 325.00- CREDIT 00005142 273368 70009430 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 513.31 352491 1012012011 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 97.98 INTOX UNIT REPAIRS 273151 344075 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 97.98 352492 10/20/2011 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE 12.01 273152 093011 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 12.63 273152 093011 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 13.64 273152 093011 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 16.41 273152 093011 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 21.01 273152 093011 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 22.95 273152 093011 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 24.75 273152 093011 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 31.96 273152 093011 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 38.69 273152 093011 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 39.85 273152 093011 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 53.78 273152 093011 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 60.88 273152 093011 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 79.90 273152 093011 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 118.42 273152 093011 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 120.47 273152 093011 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.76 273152 093011 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 153.38. 273152 093011 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 208.76 273152 093011 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/20/2011 - 10120/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 91628 273152 093011 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 352493 1012012011 102146 JESSEN PRESS 321.70 BUSINESS PLANS 7,023.00 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 7,344.70 352494 10/20/2011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 127.20 4,550.30 60.30 5,841.25 3,208.95 10119/20117:55:50 Page- 12 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE 273300 29649 1120.6575 PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR ADMINISTRATION 273341 29815 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 273255 1649242 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 273396 1641430 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 273397 1641431 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 273398 1641423 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 273399 1641421 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 273400 1641422 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 352495 1012012011 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 166.55 FERTILIZER, SPRINKLER 00002379 273116 59360717 166.55 352496 10120/2011 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD 40.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273342 101411 40.00 352498 1012012011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,023.68 273177 1152915 374.04 273178 1150245 2,697.61 273179 1153851 1,693.47 273180 1153850 1,527.38 273181 1153854 22.11 273182 1153855 7,821.08 273183 1153853 .56 273184 1153837 5,130.92 273185 1153852 401.98 273186 1153856 962.08 273401 1153836 1,414.76 273402 1153832 741.07 273403 1153840 139.97 273404 1153841 767.28 273405 1153835 1,533.47 273406 1153838 5630.6406 5620.6201 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 GENERALSUPPLIES LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10119/2011 7:55:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 10/20/2011 -10120/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 339.12 273407 1153845 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .56 273408 1153834 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,395.44 273409 1153843 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 258.00 273410 1153842 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,007.29 273411 1153844 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,826.70 273412 1153846 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,004.37 273413 1153847 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 186.24 273414 1153849 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 395.40 273415 1153848 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.79- 273416 512699 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING. 9.00- 273417 512627 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 15.26- 273418 512626 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 44,619.53 352499 1012012011 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY , 201.63 GAUGES 00001034 273256 117461 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 201.63 352500 10/2012011 129405 KEY ELECTRIC LLC 3,505.00 CONCESSION AREA ELECTRICAL 273343 101111 -04 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEE-P .° . 3,505.00 352601 1012012011 100286 KLAPPERICK, TERRY 68.12 BOILER PARTS 273048 100711 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER'BLDG/MAINT 68.12 352502 1012012011 101751 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY.JNC 345.99. SLUDGE AWAY, SAFETY GLASSES 00002217 273344 1017974962 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 345.99 352503 1012012011 118660 LAKES AREA HO_ ME IMPROVEMENT SE 118.00 LAWN FAUCET REPAIR 273117 1360 05485.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -485 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD 118.00 352504 1012012011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 182.73 WASHERS, NUTS 00001020 273118 9300172758 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 182.73 352505 10/2012011 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 30.00 ONLINE CLASS 273257 154768 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 30.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 14 10/20/2011 - 10/2012011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352506 1012012011 100858 LOGIS 1,202.00 273258 34146 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,535.00 273258 34146 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,079.00 273258 34146 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,126.00 273258 34146 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,193.00 273258 34146 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,215.00 273258 34146 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,942.00 273258 34146 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 26,292.00 352507 1012012011 101792 LUBE -TECH 1,126.75 GAS 00006045 273259 1959867 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 1,207.92 GAS 273260 1959866 5431.6581 GASOLINE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1,513.23 DIESEL 00006046 273261 1959865 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,847.90 352508 10/2012011 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,798.59 273419 118435 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,096.67 273420 118607 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,895.26 352509 1012012011 102237 MANGEN, DEBRA 116.02 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 273464 101711 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 116.02 352510 1012012011 118819 MASTER SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 252.37 SPRINKLER REPAIRS 273119 20263 01370.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON 252.37 352511 1012012011 101483 MENARDS 37.76 SANDPAPER, VARNISH 00006288 273049 49691 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 102.15 TAPE, TOOLS 00006111 273262 47182 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 58.76 LEAF BLOWER 00006367 273345 50611 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 38.41 STAIN 00006288 273346 50561 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5.42 BOARD 00006288 273347 52977 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 242.50 352512 1012012011 101987 MENARDS 78.96 PAINT 00001908 273050 31353 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.51 DOOR STOPS 00002221 273348 33688 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 87.70 POWERSTRIPS, TIMERS 00002223 273349 34139 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 195.17 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 15 10120/2011 - 10/20/2011 - Check # Date Amount . Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352513 1012012011 104166 MENARDS 178.29 ANTIFREEZE, BULBS 00602388 273301 34140 5630.6406 GENE_ RAL.SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 178.29 352514 10120/2011 129615 MERTIKAS, GEORGIOS 83.48 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT- REFUND 273263 7721 MARTH CT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 83.48 352515 1012012011 102507- METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 82.50 OFFICIATING FEES 273350 3976 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 82.50 352516 1012012011 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 58.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 273351 101411 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGHADMINISTRATION 302.42 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 273351 101411 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . _ EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 360.50 352517 10/2012011 101674 MINNESOTA DEPT OF COMMERCE - 37.33 BLACKBERRY REPAIRS 180478 CUST 873184124 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS Supplier 122193 SPRINT 37.33 352518 10/2012011 129622, MINNESOTA OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GR 24.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES . 50.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 50.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, ASSESSING" 50.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE . 273302 002301 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 50.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, ADMINISTRATION 50.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 100.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 250.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 250.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER' MAINTENANCE •- 273302 002301. 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 400.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 - 002301 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 570.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 900.00 CITY WIDE PRINTER MAINTENANCE 273302 002301 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 3.03 273303 003480 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 6.54 273303 003480 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA'ADMINISTRATION 16.94 273303 003480 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 16 10/20/2011 - 10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 18.26 273303 003480 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.40 273303 003480 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 31.40 273303 003480 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 32.39 273303 003480 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 32.49 273303 003480 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 58.81 273303 003480 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 76.42 273303 003480 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 77.98 273303 003480 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 92.17 273303 003480 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 94.70 273303 003480 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 128.01 273303 003480 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 130.21 273303 003480 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 248.90 273303 003480 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 289.24 273303 003480 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 337.94 273303 003480 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 351.35 273303 003480 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 717.15 273303 003480 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 894.97 273303 003480 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 3.04 273304 004674 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 5.59 273304 004674 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 13.89 273304 004674 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 17.52 273304 004674 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.49 273304 004674 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 45.73 273304 004674 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 53.86 273304 004674 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 68.44 273304 004674 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 70.21 273304 004674 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 73.08 273304 004674 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 81.49 273304 004674 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 88.43 273304 004674 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 127.07 273304 004674 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 143.14 273304 004674 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 255.67 273304 004674 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 293.24 273304 004674 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 426.83 273304 004674 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 572.65 273304 004674 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 727.67 273304 004674 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 917.05 273304 004674 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 11,258.39 352519 1012012011 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS R55CKREG LOG20000 RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1,070.18 CITY OF EDINA COST OF,GOODS SOLD WINE - YORK SELLING 352521 1012012011 Council Check Register 100906 MM DISTRIBUTING INC. -- GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10/2012011 - 10/20/2011 1,093.98 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 104.22 ' PROMENADE CARDS 273153 9923 2210.6575 PRINTING 193.31. GRANDVIEW NOTICE 273264 10112 1140.6575 PRINTING 193.32 SHREDDING EVENT 273264 10112 5862.6575 PRINTING 490.85. 522.00 352520 1012012.011 .100898 MINVALCO 328.50 956.85 '. CO ALARMS 00001019 273154 817812 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 113.33 3/4 RELIEF 00001972 273265 816467 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5431.6545 5431 .6406 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 1470.6614 1553.6530 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page- 17 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS PLANNING VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1,070.18 RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE COST OF,GOODS SOLD WINE - YORK SELLING 352521 1012012011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE :. 100906 MM DISTRIBUTING INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,093.98 FUNGICIDE 273266 815520 -00 549.26 IRRIGATION PARTS 00006093 273267 815351 -00 1,643.24 352522 1012012011 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 522.00 273187 69120 328.50 273188 69121 243.00 273421 69123 1,093.50 352523 1012012011 102551 NFPA - 487.21 STICKERS, BROCHURES 00003657 273155 5324758Y 487.21 362624 10/2012011 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 376.98 LIGHTS 00005475 273051 '28675 376.98 `- - 352525 10120/2011 105007 NU- TELECOM . 557.72 OCT SERVICE 273156 80531432 557.72 352526 10/2012011 116114 OCE 77.22 SEPT MAINTENANCE 273120 987546848 147.67 SEPT MAINTENANCE 273268 987538419 172.18 OCT MAINTENANCE 273269 987559889 397.07 352527. 1012012011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 16.08 PAPER 273270 1395249722 16.08 5431.6545 5431 .6406 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 1470.6614 1553.6530 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page- 17 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS PLANNING VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE COST OF,GOODS SOLD WINE - YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE :. 50TH ST SELLING FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 18 10/20/2011 - 1012012011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352528 1012012011 129486 PAPCO INC. 35.28 TOWELS 273305 67509 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 38.67 PAPER BAGS 273306 67313 -1 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 73.95 352529 1012012011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,250.77 273189 8322674 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,554.72 273190 8322688 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 957.76 273422 8322581 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 5,763.25 352530 1012012011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 472.60 273423 65655833 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 372.80 273424 73814101 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 645.40 352531 10/2012011 103512 PETTY CASH - 4.57- PETTY CASH 273373 101711 1400.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 23.90 PETTY CASH 273373 101711 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 29.29 PETTY CASH 273373 101711 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 113.61 PETTY CASH 273373 101711 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 183.76 PETTY CASH 273373 101711 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 304.01 PETTY CASH 273373 101711 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 650.00 352532 10120/2011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 364.62 273191 2138562 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 622.35 273192 2138552 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 700.96 273193 2138560 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 831.75 273194 2138561 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 649.31 273195 2138559 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,449.94 273425 2138551 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,420.22 273426 2138556 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,262.02 273427 2138558 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 273428 2138557 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 37.12 273429 2138554 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 911.53 273430 2138550 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 383.70 273431 2138553 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 9,634.64 352633 1012012011 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC R55CKREG LOG20000 325.00 CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7410.6103 352635 1012012011 Council Check Register 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10/20/2011 _ - 10/20/2011 2,778.44 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 959.54 ATHLETIC FIELD MIX 00001846 273052 40747 1642.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 959.54 50TH ST SELLING 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 352534 10120/2011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 416.50 NITRLE GLOVES 325.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 273157 101111 1628.6235 POSTAGE 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 1400.6610 325.00 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7410.6103 352635 1012012011 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,778.44 FUNGICIDE 00006085 273271 37482 VERNON SELLING 2,778.44 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 352536 1012012011 50TH ST SELLING 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 416.50 NITRLE GLOVES 273158 46170 416.50 352537 10120/2011 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 231.92 ACCESS CARDS 273121 57832 1,593.96 CHANGE IP ADDRESSES 273307 58741 1.825.88 352538 1012012011 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 557.17 LINERS, SOAP, TOWELS 00002390 273308 5373 2,786.95 TRASH CANS, LINERS 00002212 273352 5364 3,344.12 362539 1012012011 100971 QUALITY WINE . 1,644.01 273196 520728 -00 87.34 273197 520440 -00 290.66 273198 520759 -00 2,307.25 273199 520550 -00 135.20 273200 520729 -CO 1,493.10 273201 520441 -00 240.00 273202 520760 -00 4,208.03 273203 520730 -00 384.59 273432 520442 -00 236.80 273433 520731 -00 49.60 273434 520761 -00 11,076.58 352540 10/2012011 125936 REINDERS 505.52 FUNGICIDE 00006092 273272 3011663 -00 505.52 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5630.6511 5620.6406 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5514 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5431.6545 CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page - 19 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PSTF ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page - 20 Business Unit. INSPECTIONS ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS TREES & MAINTENANCE GRILL GRILL PUBLIC.PROGRAMS PSTF OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CITY HALL GENERAL. TOBACCO ENFORCEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/20/2011 - 10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 352541 1012012011 102716 RON'S MECHANICAL _ 108.40 PERMIT REFUND 273159 ED108185 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS 108.40 352542 10/2012011 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 303.00 2ND QTR DUES /MEALS 273122 855 11,20.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 303.00 273160 838 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 606.00 352543 10/2012011 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 1,510.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM 00001923 273053 54854 1644.6103' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,510.00 352544 10/2012011 101634 SA_ INT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 44.22 BAKERY 273054 324784 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 55.58 BAKERY 273353 325337 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 99.80 352545 10120/2011 117807 SAM'S CLUB 19.24 SAFETY FACILITY SUPPLIES 273309 - 100111 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 45.97 SAFETY FACILITY SUPPLIES 273309- =100111 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 65.21 352546 1012012011 105442 ;SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 20.31 TUBES 00001021 .273273 40969298 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.31 352647 1012012011 104161 SCH_INDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 521.16 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 273354 8103018280 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 521.16 352648 10120/2011 129613 SCHLEISS, BENJAMIN 30.00 TOBACCO COMPLIANCE CHECKS 273274 101011 1413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30.00 352549 1012012011 101677: SCHMOLL, RUTH 316.82 FIRE PETTY CASH 273161 101011 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 316.82 . 352550 10/2012011 100995 SEH 3,798.90 PAMELA PK IMPROVEMENTS 273123 248381 01360.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page - 20 Business Unit. INSPECTIONS ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS TREES & MAINTENANCE GRILL GRILL PUBLIC.PROGRAMS PSTF OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CITY HALL GENERAL. TOBACCO ENFORCEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BA -360 PAMELA PARK N'HOOD R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Check # Date 352551 1012012011 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 10119/2011 7:55:50 Page- 21 Business Unit SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS. RECON VETERANS MEMORIAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 352652 10120/2011 128606 SHRED- N- GO INC. Council Check Register 10/20/2011 - 10/20/2011 Amount Supplier / Explanation,.,, PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 90.05 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 273124 248383 03461.1705.21 150.08 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 273124 248383 05510.1705.21 1,020.51 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 273124 248383 01384.1705.21 1,740.89. RIDGE RD RECONSTR 273124 248383 04374.1705.21 13,527.99' MINNEHAHA WOODS PROJECT 273275 248468 034 60.1705.21 14,363.69. MINNEHAHA WOODS PROJECT. 273275 248468 04375.1705.21 28,923.25 MINNEHAHA WOODS PROJECT - 273275 248468 05511.1705.21 29,510.86: MINNEHAHA WOODS PROJECT 273275 248468 01334.1705.21 6,372.52' ARCHITECTURAL FEES 273355 249114 47073.6710 99,498.74 352554 10120/2011 129604 SELECTADVANTAGE 101000 SIR SPEEDY, 300.00 SET -UP FEE FOR DISPATCH 273162 10021521 1400.6230 300.00 273125 70350 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Subledger Account Description CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 10119/2011 7:55:50 Page- 21 Business Unit SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS. RECON VETERANS MEMORIAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 352652 10120/2011 128606 SHRED- N- GO INC. 83.33 SHREDDING EVENT 273276 21185 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 83.33 SHREDDING EVENT 273276 21185 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL - 83.34 SHREDDING EVENT 273276 21185 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 250.00 352553 10/20/2011 121382 - SIGNATURE AQUATICS 354.98 . CHLORINE PUMP REPAIR 00002225 273356: 1195 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 354.98 352554 10120/2011 101000 SIR SPEEDY, 202.99 MAILING LABELS 273125 70350 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 202.99 352655 1012012011 127878 SOUTHERN WIN_ E AND SPIRITS 1,017.48 273204 1495478 5862.5512 COST OF-GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,034.00 273205 1645034 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,457.00 273206 1606352 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 247.50 273207 1645024 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 563.50 273435 1606350 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 227.47 273436 1495485 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING _ 257.51 273437. 1495480 5842.5512 COST ORGOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 202.50 273438 1649426 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,436.00 273439 1608351 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 104.03 273440 1606791 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 6,546.99 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/2012011 —10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 352556 1012012011 101004 SPS COMPANIES 836.14 FAUCETS 00001960 273055 S2432193.001 1646.6530 70.21- CUST NO. 492 - INV PAID TWICE 273126 CREDIT ON ACCT 7411.6406 765.93 352557 10120/2011 129603 STAHL, WILLIAM 275.79 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 273127 5520 PARK PL 5900.2015 275.79 352558 1012012011 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 15.55 KEYS 273056 CH- 564683 1646.6406 15.55 352559 1012012011 117685 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 823.81 CARTRIDGES 273357 110550311 1550.6406 823.81 352560 1012012011 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 116.28 REPLACED LOUVER DOOR 00001649 273057 27835 5921.6180 116.28 352561 10120/2011 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 2,573.89 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005509 273277 598999 1553.6180 2,573.89 352562 1012012011 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 31.46 PUBLISH NOTICE 273058 1341515 1120.6120 31.46 352563 10120/2011 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 42.26 PHONE LISTING 273278 100411 5861.6188 42.27 PHONE LISTING 273278 100411 5821.6188 42.27 PHONE LISTING 273278 100411 5841.6188 126.80 352564 10120/2011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 2,118.00 273208 V000527 5642.5514 1,591.00 273209 V000521 5862.5514 1,800.00 273441 V000563 5822.5514 5,509.00 352565 . 10/20/2011 105441 SUSA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page- 22 Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 MERCHANDISE 273358 2956799 CITY OF EDINA 222.84 10/1912011 7:55:50 273359 2961005 5440.5511 215.77 Council Check Register 2960199 Page - 23 311.76 273361 2962736 5440.5511 10/20/2011 -10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 07101.1705.21 977.03 135.00 UTILITY OPERATION (3) 273128 OCT 25 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 135.00 PROGRAM FEE 273362 1 1504.6218 500.00 352566 1012012011 120595 T- MOBILE 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 39.48 WELDING TANKS 273310 42.62 SURVEY PHONE 273129 092711 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 47.35 42.62 352567 1012012011 120326 TCC MATERIALS 292.01 MORTAR MIX 00001987 273059 0000541580 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 12.00- REFUND PALLET CHARGE 273060 0000541913 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 280.01 352568 10120/2011 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 213.68 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 273279 101211 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 213.68 352569 10120/2011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 103.10 273280 659177 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 77.75 273442 659791 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,553.70 273443 659792 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,734.55 352570 1012012011 101474 TITLEIST 1,424.20 MERCHANDISE 273358 2956799 5440.5511 222.84 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 273359 2961005 5440.5511 215.77 273360 2960199 5440.5511 311.76 273361 2962736 5440.5511 2,174.57 352571 10120/2011 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 977.03 FRANCE AVE RET WALL PROJECT 273130 002011002864 07101.1705.21 977.03 352572 10120/2011 129626 TOLERANCE MINNESOTA 500.00 PROGRAM FEE 273362 1 1504.6218 500.00 352573 10/20/2011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 39.48 WELDING TANKS 273310 429837 5630.6406 7.87 ALUMINUM 00002376 273311 365578 5630.6406 47.35 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONSULTING INSPECTION EDUCATION PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 5101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES Subledger Account Description ELECTRICAL PERMITS Business Unit Ili!b714�f1[�L`ti: 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page - 24 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING NEW EQUIPMENT PSTF ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/2012011 — 1012012011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 352574 10120/2011 129507 TORVUND, DOUGLAS 1,473.75 ELECTRICAL PERMITS FEES 273281 093011 1495.4113 1,473.75 352575 1012012011 122109 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 6.92 COPIER USAGE 273131 8360756,8567151 1400.6230 6.92 352576 1012012011 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 226.77 COPIER USAGE 273312 187963970 7410.6575 226.77 352577 10/2012011 122302 TOUCHPOINT LOGIC LLC 1,518.00 DIGITAL AUDIO RECORDER 273163 3500 2210.6711 1,518.00 352578 1012012011 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 12.40 BACKGROUND CHECKS 273370 09121249 1400.6103 12.40 352579 1012012011 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 144.29 WEED CONTROL 00001922 273061 084390 1551.6103 144.29 352580 10/2012011 129627 TUBMAN 987.00 HUMAN SERVICES 273363 101011 1504.6103 987.00 352581 10/2012011 100363 U.S. BANK 88.39 FIRE STATION EXPENSES 273164 101111 1470.640E 258.46 FIRE STATION EXPENSES 273164 101111 1470.6558 2,200.00 FIRE STATION EXPENSES 273164 101111 1470.6104 2,546.85 352582 10/2012011 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 273132 100411 1500.6103 38.20 INTERNET 273132 100411 1550.6155 56.10 352583 1012012011 125032 UNISELECT USA 11270.94 AUTO PARTS 273062 093011 1553.6530 1,270.94 Subledger Account Description ELECTRICAL PERMITS Business Unit Ili!b714�f1[�L`ti: 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Page - 24 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING NEW EQUIPMENT PSTF ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 25 10/20/2011 - 10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352584 1012012011 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 270.74 PAGERS 273313 U0319246J 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 270.74 352685 1012012011 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 413.23 LIQUOR BAGS, LINERS, PLATES 273063 213113 -00 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 413.23 352586 1012012011 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 94.23 273165 2627200742 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 94.23 352587 1012012011 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 268.21. TOP STRUTS 00006095 273282 58092 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 117.56 WATER FILL PARTS 00006039 273283 57994 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 385.77 352588 1012012011 101066 - VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 104.93 TAPE MEASURE, MECH LUGS 00001022 273284 5796118 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE - 104.93 352589 10120/2011 - 119454 VINOCOPIA- 612.00 273444 0045579 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 216.00 273445 _' 0045578 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 235.58 273446 0045580 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,063.58 352590 1012012011 102642 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC 185.00 DEMAND STUDY UPDATE 273133 21349210003 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 440.00 50TH & FRANCE CONCEPT DESIGN 273134 21373200004 01242.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -242 SOTH k FRANCE STRTSCAPE 625.00 352591 1012012011 129629 WALWARK, SARAH 12.00 REFUND FOR FALL PARTY 273374 101711 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC- PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 12.00 352592 1012012011 100183 -WASHINGTON COUNTY 110.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 273314 101111 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 110.00 - 362593 10120/2011 129618 - WELLSWOOD GROUP LLC, THE R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10/20/2011 - 10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 70.45 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 273285 5713 DREW AVE 5900.2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 70.45 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 352594 1012012011 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 721.99 SEPT CHARGES 273369 823647382 1400.6103 721.99 362695 10/2012011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 507.55 273210 281768 -00 5842.5513 858.15 273211 281616 -00 5862.5513 831.55 273212 281937 -00 5862.5513 1,093.45 273447 281766 -00 5822.5513 3,290.70 352596 1012012011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 242.24 273213 380212 5862.5513 1,599.68 273214 380933 5862.5513 1,468.01 273215 380931 5862.5513 174.30 273448 380929 5822.5513 1,664.24 273449 380932 5842.5513 435.75 273450 380983 5842.5513 5,584.22 352597 1012012011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 8,719.17 273216 644019 5862.5513 2,229.70 273217 638982 5862.5513 1,297.09 273218 642236 5862.5513 1,890.37 273219 644018 5862.5512 5,613.24 273220 644024 5842.5513 19,383.07 273221 638984 5842.5512 4,421.15 273222 644022 5842.5512 1,710.90 273223 643947 5842.5512 396.12 273224 640364 5842.5512 34.53 273225 644023 5842.5515 100.00 273226 644025 5842.5512 1,707.85 273227 638985 5842.5512 1,542.10 273451 644020 5822.5512 749.14 273452 644021 5822.5513 2,331.60 273453 645665 5862.5513 608.70 273454 645599 5862.5512 52,734.73 Subledger Account Description CUSTOMER REFUND 10/19/20117:55:50 Page - 26 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/19/2011 7:55:50 Council Check Register Page - 27 10/20/2011 - 10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352598 10120/2011 124529 . -WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 312.60 273064 810251 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,429.05 273228 811366 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 273229 811368 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 273230 811367 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 241.00 273364 813207 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,704.20 273455 810802 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 107.70 273456 810803 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,038.50 273457 813186 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 273458 813187 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,346.50 273459 813373 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,336.05 273460 .810482 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 21.50- 273461 22940 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 9,644.66 352599 1012012017, 123911 WRAP CITY GRAPHICS 26.72 SIGNS 273365 11 -564 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 26.72 352600 10120/2011 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,081.00 - VALLEY VIEW RD STUDY 273135 2- 01686 -220 01238.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC ` 147.01 70TH ST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 273286 11-01686-180 03457.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-457 W70TH TS IMPLEMENTATION 980.06 70TH ST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 273286_ 11- 01686 -180 05503.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-503 W70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 1,960.12 70TH ST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 273286 11- 01686 -180 06043.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TS-43 W 70TH ST RECON ' . 2,107.13 70TH ST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 273286 11 -01686 -180 08057.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION L -57-W 70TH ST RECON 2,401.15 70TH ST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 273286. 11 -01686 -180 06044.1705.21 - CONSULTING INSPECTION TS-44 W 70TH ST RECON 4,802.29 70TH ST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 273286 11- 01686 -180. 04369.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -369 W 70TH STREET 36,605:24 70TH ST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 273286 11- 01686 -180 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 1,362.55 -. 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 273287. - 12- 01686 -170 06045.1705.21 CONSULTING'INSPECTION TS-45 W 44TH ST RECON - 1,675.28 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 273287 12- 01686 -170 03466.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-466 W 44TH ST RECON 6,701.10 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 273287 12- 01686 -170 04381.1705.21 CONSULTING' INSPECTION INTERLACHEN BLVD SIDEWALK 14,831.77 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 273287 12- 01686 -170 05516.1705.21 - CONSULTING INSPECTION W 44TH ST RECON 31,271.80 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 273287 12- 01686 -170 01383.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION . - BA -383' W44TH ST 106,926.50 352601 10120/2011 101726 • XCEL ENERGY 9,011.18 51- 6824328 -7 273065 299036566 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUBHOUSE 388.47 51- 41976454 273066 299363676 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5,480.08 51- 5888961 -7 273067 299201241 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 2,052.19 51- 5619094 -8 273068 299190765 1552.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,823.78- 51- 684005D -6 273069 299038192 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 6,688.52 51- 6121102 -5 273070 299388338 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/2012011 —10/20/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 27,444.22 352602 1012012011 62.50 62.50 352603 1012012011 376.40 376.40 721,839.29 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 273231 10567 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00002386 273315 54167589 Grand Total 10/19/20117:55:50 Page - 28 Business Unit 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5631.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 721,839.29 Total Payments 721,839.29 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND X101,758.15 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND - 9,240.65 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 23.90 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,975.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 123,888.42 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 51,677.38 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 30,391.36 05100 ART CENTER FUND 694.95 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 64.13 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND _ .260.56 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND - 26,004.07 ' 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 4,839.39 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 15,988.68 05800 LIQUOR FUND 201,207.69 - 05900 UTILITY FUND 79,315.01 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 28,351.82 05950 RECYCLING FUND 38,820.60 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,236.14 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,101.39 Report Totals 721,839.29 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 10/20/2011 - 1012012011 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief -that these claims comply in all materiaUrespects with the requirements -of the City Of Edina purchasing polici s an Procedures dat D FFce Di r ' or a 9er 10/19/20117:56:50 Page - 1 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/2612011 7:48:57 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST. OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 10/27/2011 - 10127/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No 352604 1012712011 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 216.00 AUG FEE 273626 0021179 -IN 1550.6103 533.20 HRA ADMIN FEE 273627 0021312 -IN 1550.6103 211.00 SEPT FEE 273628 0021443 -IN 1550.6103 533.20 HRA ADMIN FEE 273629 0021401 -IN 1550.6103 1,493.40 362606 10127/2011 103173 ACCOUNTEMPS 832.80 UTILITY BILLING TEMP 273465 34122486 5910.6103 832.80 352606 10/2712011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 68.20 273528 0815660 5842.5515 121.40 273529 0201904 5862.5515 66.00 273530 0815658 5822.5515 70.80 273653 0815705 5842.5515 91.20 273654 0815702 5862.5515 417.60 352607 1012712011 129845 ACOUSTICAL CONCEPTS INC. 405.00 COMPLETION OF CEILING WORK 273788 9159 5600.1720 405.00 352608 10127/2011 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 124.43 PEST CONTROL 273569 680611 5421.61 D2 124.43 352609 10/27/2011 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 23.76 PRESSURIZE EXTINGUISHERS 273600 109521 7411.6406 23.76 352610 1012712011 102716 ALLEGRA EDINA 175.44 MEMBERSHIP FORMS 273789 89575 5621.6575 175.44 352611 1012712011 101606 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 54.64 BAGEL CUTTER 273790 2949744 5620.6406 54.64 352612 10/27/2011 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 4,390.00 PREMIUM 273630 6100000130204 1550.6200 4,390.00 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/2612011 7:48:57 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST. OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING Council Check Register 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 362613 1012712011 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 99.54 COFFEE 273570 421489 5430.5510 99.54 352614 10/27/2011 129634 AUTOLN ELECTRONICS NIGHT VISI 3,900.00 THERMAL IMAGER 00003119 273536 1092392 2330.6406 3,900.00 352615 1012712011 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 9,089.80 NEW SQUADS BUILD UP 273537 3611 421400.6710 9,089.80 352616 10127/2011 105840 B & B SHEET METAL & ROOFING IN 5,920.00 ROOF FOR CONCESSION AREA 273791 6969 5600.1720 5,920.00 352617 10/27/2011 129549 BEHLEN, NATE 145.41 TRAINING EXPENSES 273500 101811 5919.6104 145.41 352618 1012712011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 73.10 273655 70469600 5842.5515 2,030.70 273656 70469300 5662.5513 37.46 273657 85905000 5862.5515 106.05 273658 6123900 5862.5515 109.72 273659 85879000 5842.5515 2,357.03 352619 1012712011 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 300.00 IRRIGATION SYSTEM BLOW OUT 273601 138190 7411.6136 53.44 MOWING 273602 138201 7411.6136 353.44 352620 10127/2011 126139 BERNICK'S WINE 616.00 273660 35516 5842.5514 616.00 352621 10127/2011 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 91.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 273538 WO- 725645 -1 1400.6513 8.54 ORGANIZER 273792 WO- 726185 -1 1190.6406 100.05 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page- 2 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE DRUG FORFEITURE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING SNOW & LAWN CARE P.STF OCCUPANCY SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 10/27/2011 - 1012712011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explana0on PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352622 1012712011 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 119.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 273571 71889 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 119.59 352623 10127/2011 123414 BOOM, CHET 250.92 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273466 101711 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 250.92 352624 10/2712011 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 853.29 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003628 273603 87286291 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 501.84 00003631 273604 87295954 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 224.28 00003631 273605 87296390 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,579.51 352625 10/27/2011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 58.75 ELEMENT 00005480 273467 570204 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 317.88 PIPE ASSEMBLY, ELBOWS 00005428 273501 570195 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 376.64 352626 10/27/2011 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 167.00 CONCRETE TESTING 273793 341827 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 167.00 352827 1012712011 103279 BRETSON, GREG 149.85 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273631 102111 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 149.85 352628 10127/2011 102220 BROWDER STONE COMPANY 406.66 JR FIRE HATS 00003643 273794 21102 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 406.66 352629 1012712011 129655 BUSCIS, LYNDA 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 273870 101111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 352630 1012712011 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 187.14 PHOTO FRAME 273532 ORDER020001623 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 187.14 352631 1012712011 123616 CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT INC. 10,832.85 GEESE MANAGEMENT 00001040 273468 2011016 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Council Check Register Page - 4 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10,832.85 - 352632 10/2712011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 31.10 273661 985174 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 1,223.60 273662 985172 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,254.70 352633 1012712011 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 452.00 273663 91602 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 452.00 352634 10/2712011 123898 CENTURYLINK 58.67 952 944 -6522 273469 6522 -10111 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 58.67 352635 10/27/2011 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 625.74 DESCALERS, ODOR SPONGES 00008049 273470 516717 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 479.02 TOWER TREATMENT, ICE MELT 00008052 273795 516721 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 1,104.76 352636 10/27/2011 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 253.51 ENVELOPES 273471 31979 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 253.51 352637 1012712011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 163.75, 273664 457287 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 398.05 273665 457599 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 561.80 352638 10127/2011 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 45,926.50 JOINT POWERS 273539 51867 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 45,926.50 352639 10/2712011 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 187.42 00102561- 0203163003 273472 203163003 -10/11 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY 81.89 00102561- 0200862003 273473 200862003 -10/11 5821.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 19.38 00114064-0203502012 273572 203502012 -10/11 4091.6189 SEWER & WATER GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 73.82 00082198 - 0200815001 273573 200815001 -10/11 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 1,738.81 00101025- 0203610011 273574 203610011 -10/11 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 572.28 00101025-0203600013 273575 203600D13 -10/11 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 2,673.60 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page- 5 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 875.00 CITY OF EDINA MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 352641 1012712011 - Council Check Register 254.80 10/27/2011 — 10/27/2011 0148023912 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 352640 1012712011 103040 CITY PAGES • 5842.5515 ` 291.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 273474 DI0047506 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 273474 D10047506 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER, 29167 MAGAZJNE ADVERTISING 273474 D10047506 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page- 5 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 875.00 YORK SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 352641 1012712011 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 254.80 273666 0148023912 5862.5515 277.60 273667 0148238228 5842.5515 532.40 352642 1012712011 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 92.13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 273796 101011 1600.6107 92.13 352643 1012712011 101345 COLOURS 4,253.63 BRANDING/CONSULTING RESEARCH 273502 10292 2210.6103 4,253.63 352644 1012712011 120433 COMCAST 13.52 8772 10 614 0373022 273632 373022 -9/11 1120.6103 105.31 8772 10 614 0396908 273797 396908 - 10/11' 5631.6105 118.83 352645 1012712011 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 54,334.57 ASPHALT 00001837 273503 093011 1314.6518 54,334.57 352646 1012712011 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 274.66 CLAY 00009192 273848 1W000063205 5110.6564 563.23 CLAY 00009192 273848 INV000063205 5120.5510 837.89 352647 1012712011 129646 CROSSTOWN MASONRY INC. ' 15,100.00 AGGREGATE/CONCRETE WORK 00002166 273798 2453 5600.1720 15,100.00 352648 10/2712011 121618 DAKOTA °SUPPLY GROUP 183.85 METER, DIAL 00001997 273504 7062076 5917.6530 183.85 352649 1012712011 104020 DALCO 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page- 5 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/26/20117:48:57 Council Check Register Page - 6 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 114.68 FLOOR STRIPPER 273799 2381846 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 182.54 CLEANERS 00008057 273800 2386571 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 297.22 352650 10/2712011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 43.00 273668 622486 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,763.90 273669 622487 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 22.40 273670 622488 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,078.10 273671 622489 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,944.05 273672 622490 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22.40 273673 622491 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,873.85 352651 1012712011 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 66.80 SP REMOVER 00005477 273475 626297 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.72 SOCKET 00005387 273476 623850 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.52 352652 1012712011 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 100.95 BAKERY 273576 386301 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 44.09 273577 386643 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 145.04 352653 1012712011 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 6,529.63 SEPT 2011 SURCHARGE 273801 12773053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 6,529.63 352654 10127/2011 129652 DILLON, BRUCE 30.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 273849 1582 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 30.00 352655 1012712011 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 1,358.83 CHEMICALS 00001840 273505 82701571 -11 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,358.83 352656 10127/2011 129653 EASTERN SAVINGS BANK 44.38 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 273850 6020 SAXONY RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 44.38 352657 10/2712011 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 331.05 273674 969 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 331.05 CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 10/27/2011 — 10127/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352658 10127/2011 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 24.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 209362 041009 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 110.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273477 101211 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 135.96 352659 10/2712011 127287 ELLINGSON DRAINAGE 5,829.00 SEWER REPAIR -5504 BROOKVIEW 00001010 273851 9385 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 5,829.00 352660 10127/2011 127287 ELLINGSON DRAINAGE 3,900.00 SEWER REPAIR -5508 WOOD CRESM0001670 273852 9310 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 3,900.00 352661 1012712011 127287 ELLINGSON DRAINAGE 5,132.00 SEWER REPAIR -5527 PARK PL 00001329 273853 9445 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 5,132.00 352662 1012712011 106213 EMSAR INC. 1,751.99 COT MAINTENANCE 273606 SI -21660 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,751.99 362663 1012712011 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 1,359.45 CB GRATES 00001843 273506 QQ5701 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,359.45 352664 1012712011 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 134.00 273675 W- 443620 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 134.00 352665 1012712011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 9.64 FOG LAMP BULB 00005461 273478 69449860 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.92 FOG LAMP BULBS 00005461 273479 1- 3744204 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.99 BULB 00005461 273578 69- 050579 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.65 LAMP 00005461 273579 1- 3749113 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.03- CREDIT 273580 69- 050137 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.42 LAMPS 00005461 273633 69- 050403 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.59 352666 1012712011 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 93.33 REDO HANGING SIGNS 273507 190 -40979 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 93.33 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10127/2011 — 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 352667 10/2712011 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 91.54 SHIP RETURNS 00006364 273581 062200024251 5440.6122 91.54 352668 10/27/2011 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 504.34 COPPER TUBING, FITTINGS 00001991 273508 S01333387.001 5913.6406 504.34 352669 1012712011 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 162.95 FIRE BOOTS 00003664 273607 7269 1470.6552 162.95 352670 1012712011 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 273854 22716 1260.6103 425.00 352671 1012712011 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 131.97 273676 3181 5862.5514. 131.97 352672 10127/2011 129632 FORBES, ROGER 750.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 273509 101811 1470.4329 750.00 352673 1012712011 102727 FORCE AMERICA 111.06 CONNECTORS 00005546 273634 01372254 1553.6530 111.06 352674 10/2712011 102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. 68,834.73 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 273840 102811 07106.1705.30 68,834.73 352676 1012712011 102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. 54,358.43 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 273841 102711 07101.1705.30 54,358.43 352676 10/27/2011 101103 GRAINGER 50.69 MOP AND BROOM RACK 00005514 273480 9653064106 1553.6406 34.94 SAFETY GLASSES 00005519 273635 9661484221 1301.6610 387.90 SHELVING 00002215 273802 9650406441 5620.6406 473.53 Subledger Account Description ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 10126/2011 7:48:57 Page - 8 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5106 INTERLACHEN SIDEWALK CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S101 FRANCE AVE 48TH - SUNNYSIDE GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 10/2712011 — 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount - Supplie-r / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352677 1012712011 102217 GRAPE: BEGINNINGS INC 2,751.00 273677 132449 5852.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 493.50 273678 132277 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 642.25 273679 131982 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 641,25 273680 132453 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,528.00 352678 10127/2011 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 183.49 ALUMINUM HANDLES 00001415 273608 3- 104895 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 163.49 352679 1012712011 124775 -,HAMLINE UNIVERSITY 1,300:00 PUBLIC SAFETY'ADMIN/FALL 273609 9877202 1470.6104 CONFERENCES '& SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,300.00 352680 1012712011 105836 HANDMADE TILE ASSOCIATION 509.15 ADVERTISING 00009092 273481 1650 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 509.15 352681 1012712011 129207 HARLEY CONSULTING'& COACHING 7,740.00 PROGRESS BILLING FOR SERVICES 273510 3468 - 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 700:00 COACHING SESSIONS BILLING 273511 3469 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 8,440.00 352682 1012712011 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN _ 5.20 ART WORK SOLD 273871 101611 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES " 5.20 362683 1012712011 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 263.04 MEAT PATTIES 273582 023484 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 263.04 352684 10127/2011 128208. HEINZMAN,DAN 241.89 TRAINING EXPENSES 273512 101811 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 241.89 352685 1012712011 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 1,274.96 RADIO ADMIN FEE 273610 110938015 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,274.96 352686 1012712011 101215 HENNEPIN,COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFF1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Council Check Register Page - 10 10127/2011 — 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 538.63 SEPT 2011 BOOKINGS 273540 3841 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 538.63 352687 1012712011 116377 HENRICKSEN PSG 5,075.00 FURNITURE 00003608 273611 481364 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,075.00 352688 10/2712011 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 196.65 MONITOR 00004374 273612 50240665 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 196.65 352689 10/27/2011 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 1.68 TACK 00006363 273803 003466709 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 45.45 PAINT 273804 003466029 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 14.25 PAINT BRUSHES 273805 003465921 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 61.38 352690 1012712011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 986.50 273681 577070 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,937.58 273682 576818 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,924.08 352691 10127/2011 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 51,919.00 PREMIUM 273636 109282 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 121,027.00 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 273637 109318 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,293.00 INLAND MARINE (COMMERCIAL) 273638 109319 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 22,237.00 BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE 273639 109320 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 197,476.00 352692 10127/2011 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 640.70 CALHYPO, SODIUM HYPO, ACID 00002219 273806 11101106 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 640.70 352693 10/2712011 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 16.68 STRAWS 273807 129912 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 16.68 352694 1012712011 118348 IDENTIX INC. 232.50 WYPALL WIPES 273482 56349 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 232.50 352695 10127/2011 101468 IIMC CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier'/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 175.00 MEMBERSHIP- DEBRA MANGEN 273531 6555 -10/11 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 175.00 352696 10127/2011 116191 INSTY•PRINTS 204.90 PRINT EMPLOYEE BOOKLETS 273640 89476 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 204.90 352697 10/2712011 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 26.74 DATA SERVICE 273613 8890403 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 26.74 352698 1012712011 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 55.00 WATER EXAM/CERTIFICATION 273513 101811 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS • TRAINING 249.86 TRAINING EXPENSES 273513 101811 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 304.86 352699 10/27/2011 129631 JACKSON, BRUCE 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 273514 101811 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT- 273514 101811 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 352700 1012712011 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 4.03 273483 093011 1419.6106 MEETING EXPENSE RESERVE PROGRAM 8.14 273483 093011 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 8.28 273483 093011 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 16.96 273483 093011 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 17.37 273483 093011 1401.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 20.46 273483 093011 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 32.87 273483 093011 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 65.09 273483 093011 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.47 273483 093011 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 105.11 EDINA ART CENTER 273484 6600 -9111 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 346.78 362701 1012712011 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 49.62 SWITCHES, LENS 00005109 273641 0017477 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.62 352702 10127/2011 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 6,625.00 WEBSITE REDESIGN 273541 JJ4824 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 6,625.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Council Check Register Page - 12 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352703 1012712011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 110.05 273683 1649282 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,543.98 273684 1641459 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 112.00 273685 1641476 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 9,232.68 273686 1641473 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 158.80 273687 1641474 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 138.00- 273688 1608389 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 14,019.51 352704 1012712011 129424 JLC INC. 4,561.64 INSTALL FIREPROOFING/HANG SIGIMOO2230 273808 101711 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 4,561.64 352705 10/2712011 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 76.55 ROTORS 00002383 273542 59451200 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 76.55 352707 1012712011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 139.97 273689 1158490 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 205.33 273690 1158484 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 187.55 273691 1158477 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 812.08 273692 1158474 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,821.60 273693 1158494 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,068.30 273694 1158497 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 22.11 273695 1158498 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,582.78 273696 1158493 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 273697 1158479 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,520.68 273698 1159379 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 174.86 273699 1159378 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,265.93 273700 1158496 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .56 273701 1158481 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,081.12 273702 1158495 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 327.36 273703 1158485 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 110.21 273704 1158499 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 870.53 273705 1158491 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,881.18 273706 1158492 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 273707 1158480 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8,054.10 273708 1158488 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,450.75 273709 1158489 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,929.41 273710 1158486 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92.12 273711 1158482 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 46.68 273712 1158475 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57, R65CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 ' 10/2712011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,058.15 273713 1158487 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 48,705.60 352708 10/2712011 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 57.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273543 101711 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.96 352709 10127/2011 111018 KEEPRS INC. 76.89 UNIFORMS 00003645 273614 172610 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 41.99 00003645 273615 172610 -03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 77.98 00003654 273616 174335 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS ` ` FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 196:86 362710 1012712011 100285 KLAPPERICK,TERRY: 101.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273515 101711 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 101.96 352711 10127/2011 112618 KOLLMER CONSULTANT'S INC. 5,106.00 GLEASON TOWER INSPECTIONS 00001114 273516 1570 05509.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION - GLEASON WATER TOWER REHAB 5,106.00 352712 10/2712011 120511 KUSKE, BRANDON 231.45 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273544 101411 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 231.45 352713 10127/2011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS_ INC. - 361.39 NUTS, CLAMPS, SCREWS 273485 9300191053 1553.6530 REPAIR'PARTS ' EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 76.17 HEX'SCREWS 00001082 273642 9300219018 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 196.96 RIVETS 00001028 273643 9300212738 1325.6531. SIGNS-& POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 654.52 362714 10/27/2011 .128125 LITURGICAL PUBLICATIONS INC. 408.00 ADVERTISING 273583 #0002 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 408.00 362716 1012712011 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 132.90 COPIER USAGE 00005517 273486 1308744 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.90 352716 10127/2011 120343 M DESIGN INTERACTIVE INC. ? 170.00 ONLINE RESERVATION UPDATE 273487 11COE00 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 170.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Council Check Register Page - 14 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352717 1012712011 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 816.94 273714 118998 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 816.94 352718 10/27/2011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 362.08 SOLENOID VALVE 00005471 273488 2115642 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 362.08 352719 10/2712011 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 225.00 HOSTING FEE 273855 162 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 225.00 352720 10127/2011 125941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 1,504.00 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 273809 43871 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,504.00 352721 10127/2011 129638 MCWETHY, BROOKE 30.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 273584 102011 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 30.00 352722 1012712011 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,518.50 ROCHESTER TRIP 273533 101111 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,518.50 352723 10127/2011 129636 MELANDER, MARK 44.66 TRAINING EXPENSES 273545 101811 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.66 352724 1012712011 101483 MENARDS 93.88 LUMBER FOR RINKS 00001912 273546 50712 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 116.97 LUMBER 00001916 273547 53032 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.96 LUMBER 00001919 273548 53126 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 14.26 LUMBER FOR RINKS 00001927 273549 53566 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 603.39 OUTDOOR SHED 00002227 273810 57681 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 927.46 352725 1012712011 101987 MENARDS 416.49 MINI LIGHTS 00002389 273550 33934 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 233.36 MINI LIGHTS, CONCRETE MIX 00002389 273551 33946 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 92.54 PAINT TRAYS, LINERS, BRACES 00002392 273811 7702 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 334.84 MOWER, ALGAECIDE 00002360 273812 17759 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA -- Council Check Register 10/27/2011 — 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 136.04 PUMP, SHOVEL, BATTERIES 00002188 273813 18559 5620.6406 395.95 GLOVES, LIGHTS: 00002392 273814 35768 5630.6406 1,609.22 362726 1012712011 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY. 41.57 - PYLONS 273517 136227 1621.6406 133:38 VOLLEYBALLS 273518 136228 4077.6406 174.95 352727 1012712011 100885 METRO SALES INC 581.30 COPIER USAGE 273585 428487 5410.6230 581.30 352728 1012712011 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS - -.,82.50 OFFICIATING FEES 273815 3983 4077.6103 82.50 352729 10127/2011 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 13,268.50 SEPT 2011 SAC CHARGES 273519 101811 1495.4307 13,268.50 352730 1012712011 104650 MICRO CENTER 96.48 . DVDS 00003123 273816 3551610 1400.6160 96.48 352731 1012712011 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 728.65 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273842 101711 03461.1705.30 1,425:00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.A 273842 101711 05510.1705.30 3;490.74 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4L .273842 101711 04374.1705.30 8,452.34 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273842 101711 1314.6517 18,344:02 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO: 4 273842 101711 01384.1705.30 32,440.75 362732 1012712011 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 1,493.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 273867 OCT28 5400.1715 10,803.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1' 273867 OCT28 47072.6710 52,588.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT N0: 1 273867 OCT28 47074.6710 78,114.89 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 273867 OCT26 5500.1715 142,999.89 352733 1012712011 100891 MIDWESTASPHALTCORP. 54,629.74 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273868 10 -28-11 05512.1705.30 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL' SUPPLIES 10/26/20117:48:57 Page - 15 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION SAC CHARGES ' INSPECTIONS DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS': CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SAND GRAVEL & ROCK CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LANDIMPROVEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT LAND IMPROVEMENTS SS -461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD STREET RENOVATION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION GOLF BALANCE SHEET GARDEN PK PARKING LOT COUNTRYSIDE PK W PARKING ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CARSONS HILL RECON R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Council Check Register Page - 16 10/27/2011 — 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 68,053.25 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273868 10 -28-11 03462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-462 CARSONS HILL RECON 92,871.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273868 10 -28-11 04376.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CARSONS HILL RECON 263,879.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273868 10 -28-11 01370.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON 479,433.44 352734 10/2712011 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATIO 200.00 TECHNICAL RESCUE CERTIFICATION 273617 1036 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 352735 1012712011 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,950.00 SEWER REPAIR -5525 OAKLAWN 00001328 273856 33883 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,950.00 352736 1012712011 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS 55.00 CONFERENCE - AMANDA HOLLE 273817 7164 5621.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 55.00 352737 10/2712011 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 849.66 EMULSION 00005520 273520 63879 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 849.66 352738 10/27/2011 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 43.38 HALLOWEEN POSTERS 273534 10157 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 43.38 352739 1012712011 108882 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 970.03 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 273818 140069 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 115.16 CUPS FOR RESALE 273819 141237 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,085.19 352740 1012712011 103632 NEXT DAY GOURMETISUPERIOR PROD 151.20 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 273820 8464379 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 151.20 352741 10/2712011 129647 NORTH COUNTRY INSTALLATION INC 7,040.00 STAINLESS COUNTER TOPS 00002231 273821 1047 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 7,040.00 352742 10/2712011 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 10.56 LIGHT REPAIRS 00005516 273489 28711 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.56 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 352743 10127/2011 1,445.70 9,701.29 19,471.01 21,048.23 24,046.15 48,149.10 367,965.91 491,825.39 Supplier/ Explanation PO # 121497 NORTHWEST:ASPHALTINC. PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Doc No Inv No Account No 273843 093011 273843 093011 273843 093011 273843 093011 273843 093011 273843 093011 273843, 093011 03457.1705.30 05503.1705.30 06043.1705.30 08057.1705.30 06044.1705.30 04369.1705.30 01367.1705.30 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page - 17 Business Unit SS-457 W70TH TS IMPLEMENTATION WM -503 W70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY TS-43 W 70TH ST RECON L -57 W 70TH ST RECON TS-44 W 70TH ST RECON STS -369 W 70TH STREET BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 352744 10/27/2011 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. - 38,732.07 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273844 100811 03466.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-466 W 44TH ST RECON 110,648.33 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273844 100811 04380.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS W 44TH ST RECON 120,545.83 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 273844 100811 05516.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS W 44TH ST RECON " 485,614.96 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO;-4 273844 100811 01383.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -383 W44TH ST 755,541.19 352745 1012712011 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 849.07 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.5 273869 OCT2811 04377.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS KILLARNEY SHORES RECON 3,313.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 273869 OCT2811 01372.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -372 MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 8,947.57 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.5 273869 OCT2811 01371.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES 13,057.66 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 273869 OCT2811 04378.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MCCAULEY HEIGHTS RECON 26,167.42 352746 1012712011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 19.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 273586 1210882267 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 314.17 . OFFICE SUPPLIES 273822 581633600001 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 71.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 273823 582184567001 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 405.04 352747 1012712011 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG `- 23.58 273587 W11090656 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.58 273587 W11090656 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.16 273587 W11090656 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 47.16 273587 W11090656 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 70.74 273587 W11090656 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 94.32 273587 W11090656 5821.6188 TELEPHONE' _ 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 94.32 273587 W11090656 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 103.74 273587 W11090656 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 117.90 273587 .W11090656 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 141.48 273587 W11090656 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 158.39 273587 W11090656 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 161.90 208.37 208.37 330.12 PO # Doc No 273587 273587 273587 273587 273588 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/27/2011 — 10/27/2011 Inv No Account No W11090656 1646.6188 W11090656 5631.6188 W11090656 5621.6188 W11090656 1622.6188 W11090662 5420.6188 352748 1012712011 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 18.29 WIRING 00005479 273644 659464 18.29 352749 1012712011 106083 ON SITE SANITATION INC. 83.44 TOILET SERVICE 00001044 273552 A- 438051 144.28 00001043 273553 A- 438600 47.72 00001042 273554 A- 438700 352750 1012712011 129639 PACY ERCK, ELAINE 469.86 PERPETUAL PLAQUE 469.86 352761 1012712011 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 66,024.14 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.3 169,455.96 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 241,242.28 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 358,051.97 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 834,774.35 352752 1012712011 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 110,504.96 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.5 110,669.28 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 134,698.36 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.5 261,006.42 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 616,879.02 352753 1012712011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 859.75 2,862.78 92.25 3,814.78 352764 1012712011 119219 PC/NAMETAG 273589 101811 273845 102811 273845 102811 273845 102811 273845 102811 273846 101011 273846 101011 273846 101011 273846 101011 273715 8323559 -IN 273716 8323553 -IN 273717 8323561 -IN 1553.6530 1642.6103 1642.6103 1642.6103 5410.6122 03443.1705.30 04350.1705.30 01355.1705.30 05485.1705.30 03460.1705.30 04375.1705.30 04375.1705.30 01334.1705.30 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5512 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING OTHER CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR" PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page - 18 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION SKATING & HOCKEY CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION SS-443 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD STS-350 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD WM -485 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 48.46 CLIP FASTENERS FOR SOLICITORS 46.68 REGISTRATION ENVELOPES 95.14 352755 10127/2011 102963 PELUF, JIM 218.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 218.97 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/27/2011 - 10127/2011 Doc No Inv No Account No 273555 15402973 1400.4128 273556 15403226 1400.6406 273521 101711 1301.6201 Subledger Account Description SOLICITOR PERMITS GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page - 19 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 352758 1012712011 100960 PETTY CASH 2.67 273652 102111 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 4.48 273652 102111 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 4.99 273652 102111 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 6.00 273652 102111 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 7.82 273652 102111 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 9.16 273652 102111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.64 273652 102111 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 9.65 273652 102111 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 12.50 273652 102111 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 13.25 273652 102111 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15.00 273652 102111 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 16.00 273652 102111 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 16.08 273652 102111 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.22 273652 102111 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 19.43 273652 102111 5910.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL (BILLING) 32.19 273652 102111 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 34.99 273652 102111 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 39.25 273652 102111 47077.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ARNESON ACRES E GREENHOUSE 39.97 273652 102111 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 40.00 273652 102111 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE 50.00 273652 102111 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 51.20 273652 102111 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 53.98 273652 102111 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 70.00 273652 102111 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 70.77 273652 102111 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 71.26 273652 102111 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 86.90 273652 102111 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 98.09 273652 102111 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 903.49 362767 10127/2011 103612 PETTY CASH 10.00 CHECKING ACCOUNT 273557 102011 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 28.45 CHECKING ACCOUNT 273567 102011 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 75.00 CHECKING ACCOUNT 273557 102011 1400.6105 145.00 CHECKING ACCOUNT 273557 102011 1400.6106 453.25 CHECKING ACCOUNT 273557 102011 1400.6103 711.70 352758 10/2712011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 54.08 273718 2138555 5822.6122 64.08 273718 2138555 5842.6122 54.08 273718 2138555 5862.6122 1,593.77 273719 2141950 5862.5513 393.92 273720 2141944 5862.5513 1,319.34 273721 2141952 5862.5513 295.18 273722 2141945 5822.5512 2,037.79 273723 2141948 5842.5512 2,039.97 273724 2141943 5842.5513 1,958.34 273725 2141949 5842.5513 2,133.24 273726 2141947 5842.5513 257.71 273727 2141951 5862.5512 66.19 273728 2142582 5862.5513 39.12 273729 2142583 5862.5513 34.00- 273730 3468811 5822.5513 12,262.81 352759 10127/2011 100953 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 360.00 LIFEPAK BATTERY 00003624 273618 112051494 1470.6510 360.00 352760 10/27/2011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,978.90 TIRES 00005462 273522 779730 1553.6583 80.00 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 00005462 273590 785627 1553.6583 2,058.90 352761 10/2712011 108162 POWERPLAN 503.55 WATER PUMP, SEAL, GASKET 00006478 273824 P74947 1553.6530 168.75 BEARING 00005478 273825 P74933 1553.6530 692.30 352762 10/2712011 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 282.68 FLEXPASSES, FLEXCARDS 273558 56936 1400.6406 282.69 FLEXPASSES, FLEXCARDS 273558 56936 1554.6406 565.37 Subledger Account Description DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS MEETING EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE FIRST AID SUPPLIES TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page - 20 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS Subledger Account Description CUSTOMER REFUND COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page - 21 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT. OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/27/2011 -10127/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 352763 10/2712011 129651 PROM, STEVE 8, ALLISON 82.66 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND. 273857 5032 OXFORD AVE 5900.2015 82.66 352764 1012712011 100971 QUALITY WINE 611.20 273731 524799 -00 5862.5513 215.40 273732 523665 -00 5862.5513 398.40 273733 523664 -00 5862.5513 1,671.10 273734 523404 -00 5862.5512 121.18 273735 523405 -00 5822.5512 - 3,708.02 273736 523403 -00 5842.5512 696.84 273737 523663 -00 5842.5513 1,036.81 273738 523662 -00 5842.5513 " 8.70- 273739 514957 -00 5842.5512 5.33- 273740 51936400 5842.5512 8,444.92 352765 1012712011 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN I 669.81- ZAMBONI REPAIR 00008055 273490 0048447 -IN 5521.6180 513.22 ZAMBONI REPAIR 00008059 273826 0048550 -IN 5521.6180 1,183.03 352766 10127/2011 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING INC. 261.84 MAIL WATER BILLS 273559 6446 5910.6103 77.00 MAIL PAST DUE NOTICES 273858 6467 5910.6103 338.84 352767 10127/2011 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 951.79 EMULSION 00005334 269540 1419 1301.6519 956.96 EMULSION 00005521 273523 3142 1301.6519 1,908.75 352768 10/27/2011 - 102986 RECYCOOL 157.50 RECYCLE ANTIFREEZE 00005405 273859 3109131 1553.6530 157.50 352769 10127/2011 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL_"AND CHILL 153.90 DILLY BARS 273827 567 5620.5510 .56.97 CAKES 273828 569 5620.5510 210.87 352770 10127/2011 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. Subledger Account Description CUSTOMER REFUND COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page - 21 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT. OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Council Check Register Page - 22 10/27/2011 - 10127/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 206.00 WINDSHIELD TINTING 00005150 273645 64205 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 206.00 352771 10127/2011 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH 43.00 CDL DRIVERS LICENSE FEE 273524 101811 1240.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 43.00 352772 10/2712011 104602 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO. 92.39 NUTS, SCREWS 00005231 273491 S80920 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.39 352773 10127/2011 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 108.45 SOFTENER SALT 273619 00257867 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 619.88 SOFTENER SALT 00008053 273829 00258640 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 728.33 352774 1012712011 129656 RUTTER, ANNABELLE 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 273872 101111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 352775 10/2712011 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 273620 INV -03388 -2011 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING , FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 733.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 273621 IW -03542 -2011 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 783.00 352776 10/2712011 124792 SCHUELLER, JASON 17.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273830 101911 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17.99 352777 1012712011 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 43.53 SQUAD EXPENSES FOR 9K 273560 101811 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.53 352778 1012712011 106019 SERVICE FIRE PROTECTION INC. 500.00 SPRINKLER REPLACEMENT 273831 6575 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 500.00 352779 1012712011 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 64.25 ART WORK SOLD 273873 101111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 64.25 352780 10127/2011 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS CITY OF EDINA 10/26/2011 7:48:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 10/27/2011 - 10127/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 233.30 BASEBALL CAPS FOR RESALE 273623 424727 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 233.30 352781 1012712011 105654' SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 456.99 FIRE ALARM MONITORING 273832 74678658 5620.6250 ALARM SERVICE EDINBOROUGH PARK 456.99 BURGLAR ALARM MONITORING 273833 74678659 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 455.00 BEAM REPAIR 00002224 273834 67102800 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,368.98 352782 10127/2011 101532 SMITH, CECELIA , 166.03 CAMERA FOR RISK MANAGEMENT 273646 102211 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 166.03 362783 1012712011 103689 SNAP -ON TOOLS 106.82 HOSE CLAMP PLIERS 00005513 273492 214111208 -19953 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2 106.82 352784 1012712011 129587 SOLBERG, DAVID 99.59 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273525 101711 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 269.81 TRAINING EXPENSES 273591 102011 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 369.40 352785 1012712011 129654 SOUTH SUBURBAN ASPHALT 146.70 DRIVEWAY REPAIR 273860 5917 KILLARNEY 04377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION KILLARNEY SHORES RECON .. LA 146.70 352786 1012712011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 857.00 273741 1649438 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,461.85 273742 1495497 5662.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,185.00 273743 1649437 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 310.50 273744 1645078 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 83.75 273745 1495498 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,351.25 273746 1495496 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 890.44 273747 1495479 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,805.50 273748 1495490 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR ' YORK SELLING 181.00 273749 1609123 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,226.29 352787 10127/2011 105152 SPAIN, MARK • PW 262.72 UNIFORM PURCHASE 273647 102111 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE CITY OF EDINA PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Council Check Register TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 10/2712011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No TELEPHONE 262.72 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 352788 1012712011 STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 129648 SPECIALTY BUILDING PRODUCTS GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 12.88 MINERAL WOOL 00002167 273835 00021398 5620.6406 TELEPHONE 12.88 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 352789 1012712011 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 102036 SPRINGSTED INC. 8,970.00 SALARY SURVEY 273648 1- 001126.101 1120.6103 8,970.00 352790 10/2712011 104672 SPRINT 439.89 CARD READERS 273624 312188813 -046 1470.6151 11.00 273861 873184124 1240.6188 23.32 273861 873184124 7411.6188 25.74 273861 873184124 4090.6188 34.98 273861 873184124 1180.6103 42.99 273861 873184124 5311.6188 51.66 273861 873184124 5841.6188 52.58 273861 873184124 5422.6188 52.77 273861 873184124 1490.6168 53.16 273861 873184124 1190.6188 56.57 273861 873184124 1140.6188 66.00 273861 873184124 1553.6188 79.90 273861 873184124 1120.6188 88.85 273861 873184124 1554.6230 154.61 273861 873184124 1322.6188 163.30 273861 873184124 1301.6188 172.56 273861 873184124 2210.6188 200.12 273861 873184124 5620.6188 276.89 273861 873184124 1470.6188 282.70 273861 673184124 1495.6188 401.89 273861 873184124 5910.6188 544.66 273661 873184124 1640.6188 757.45 273861 873184124 1260.6188 2,184.48 273861 873184124 1400.6188 6,218.07 352791 1012712011 129649 STANCHEM 1,256.34 FIREPROOFING FOR DECK 273836 033831 5600.1720 , 1,256.34 352792 10/27/2011 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 10126/2011 7:48:57 Page - 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TELEPHONE PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE ASSESSING TELEPHONE PLANNING TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH PARK TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET - R55CKREG LOG_ 20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/27/2011 — 10127/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation "' PO.# Doc No Inv No Account No . 3,948.98 PLOW _ 00001999 273526 19884 5913.6406 3,948.98 352793 1012712011 122290 STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND L 594.00 OCT 2011 SERVER MAINTENANCE 273862 SVC134728 1400.6160 594.00 352794 1012712011 101015' STRETCHERS • 34.18 GUN CLEANING SOLVENT 273622. 1874447 7412.6406 34.18 352795 10/27/2011 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 273837 102111 5621.6136 150.00 352796 1012712011 .101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 150.00 REMOVE DECALS AND DETAIL 00005512 273493 599423 1553.6180._, 160.00- REMOVE DECALS AND DETAIL 00005512 273494 599483 1553.6180 168.29 SPOILER, LAMP 00005512 273495 348718 1553:6530 - 50.04 DEFLECTOR 00005483 273592 349630 1553.6585 1,177.34 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005526 273649 599344 1553.6180 1,695.67 352797 10/2712011 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 8;155.25 FINAL PAYMENT 273847 102811 4402.1705.30 ' 8,155.25 352798 10127/2011 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 504.00 TOWN HALL MEETING AD 273838 1340308 1100.6106 504.00. 352799 1012712011 126211 SUPERIOR CRANE CORP. 435.00 CRANE/HOIST INSPECTION 00005141 273496 104640 1646.6103 435.00 - 36.2800 10/2712011 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 17.80 HOLSTER CLIP 273561 30875 1400.6188 17.80 352801 1012712011, 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,360.00 273750 V000604 5842.5514 1,197.00 273751 V000602 5862.5514 10/26/20117:48:57 Page - 25 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING . COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 231.25 CITY OF EDINA 352806 1012712011 Council Check Register 9,300.00 10/27/2011 — 10127/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 352807 2,557.00 116535 TRAVELERS 352802 1012712011 129637 SURPENANT, MARGARET DEDUCTIBLE 273650 000391502 1550.6200 INSURANCE 66.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 273593 6120 BEARD PL 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 362808 66.88 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 352803 1012712011 104932 TAYLOR MADE WEED CONTROL 00001045 273562 084391 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/26/20117:48:57 Page - 26 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 82.80 GOLF CLUB 273594 16487235 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 121.93 GOLF CLUB 273595 16475487 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 204.73 352804 10/2712011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,096.75 273752 660751 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 33.50 273753 660752 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 120.00- 273754 00771297 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,010.25 352806 1012712011 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 231.25 DRAFT 10/4111 MINUTES 273497 M18671 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION EB /CL BALANCE SHEET CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE 149.60 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAM 273596 101841429 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.60 352810 10/2712011 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 80.16 GRASS SEED 00001915 273563 26493 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 80.16 362811 10127/2011 129093 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 231.25 352806 1012712011 129650 TITAN DRYWALL LLC 9,300.00 NEW WALLS, ROOF FRAMING 00002229 273839 0032 5600.1720 BUILDINGS 9,300.00 352807 1012712011 116535 TRAVELERS 5,570.84 DEDUCTIBLE 273650 000391502 1550.6200 INSURANCE 5,570.84 - 362808 1012712011 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 6640 106.88 WEED CONTROL 00001045 273562 084391 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 106.88 352809 10127/2011 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE 149.60 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAM 273596 101841429 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.60 352810 10/2712011 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 80.16 GRASS SEED 00001915 273563 26493 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 80.16 362811 10127/2011 129093 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page- 27 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 11500 COURSE RI 1501 -TOM HAATAJA 273864 RECERT 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 115.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 352814 1012712011 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE Council Check Register 11.86 SHIPPING CHARGES 273565 TRAN:0151 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 GENERAL SUPPLIES Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1400.6406 679.44 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 273863 5817 ARBOUR AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 679.44 352815 1012712011 352812 1012712011 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 96.82 UNIFORMS 273564 093011 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1550.6188 340.44 UNIFORMS 273564 093011 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 544.82 UNIFORMS 273564 093011 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 982.08 352813 1012712011 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ACCT #75983 273568 102011 10/26/2011 7:48:57 Page- 27 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RESERVE PROGRAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 11500 COURSE RI 1501 -TOM HAATAJA 273864 RECERT 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,216.50 273755 0045556 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,216.50 115.00 352814 1012712011 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 11.86 SHIPPING CHARGES 273565 TRAN:0151 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.14 273566 TRAN:0133 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.00 352815 1012712011 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.45 PAGER 273567 U6096083J 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 13.45 352816 1012712011 100050 USPS - HASLER 4,000.00 ACCT #75983 273568 102011 1550.6235 POSTAGE 4,000.00 352817 1012712011 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 509.91 OXYGEN 00003649 273625 03327720 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 509.91 352818 1012712011 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 90.63 LIDS 273597 213855 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 553.02 LINERS, TOWELS, CUPS 273598 213854 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 643.65 362819 10/2712011 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 193.56 273865 2641353907 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 193.56 352820 1012712011 119464 VINOCOPIA POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,216.50 273755 0045556 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,216.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA .10/2612011 7:48:57 Council Check Register Page - 28 10/27/2011 - 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 352821 10127/2011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 214.30 273756 282382 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 416.25 273757 282565 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 672.25 273758 282823 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,302.80 352822 10127/2011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 64.74 273759 380984 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 64.75 273759 380984 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 64.75 273759 380984 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 733.44 273760 381887 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,933.23 273761 381885 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 174.30 273762 382084 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 253.86 273763 382086 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.12 273764 382085 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 170.24 273765 381886 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,548.43 352823 10/27/2011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 93.65 273766 647288 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,281.92 273767 647287 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 28.10 273768 647291 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 2,185.94 273769 647290 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,263.63 273770 647293 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34.53 273771 647296 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,316.99 273772 647294 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 239.85 273773 649402 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,653.47 273774 647289 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 113.05 273775 649044 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,527.45 273776 649045 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,874.64 273777 649046 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 26,613.22 352824 10127/2011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 1,291.55 273778 814232 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,131.40 273779 816111 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 273780 816109 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 540.00 273781 816110 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,560.85 273782 813393 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,347.00 273783 813715 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 119.75 273784 813716 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10126/2011 7:48:57 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 10/27/2011 — 10/27/2011 Check # Date Amount _ Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,517.90 273785 816086 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,508.48 352825 1012712011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 3,782.29 51 -6227619 -3 273498 299908128 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES 44,981.36 51- 5605640 -1 273527 299717271 , _; 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 42.84 51- 5276505 -8 273866 300055460 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 48,806.49 352826 10127/2011 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 59.44 COPIER USAGE 273535 057501955 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 59.44 352827 1012712011 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 10,260.24 DIESEL'FUEL 00001200 273499 456625 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10,260.24 352828 10127/2011 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 372.50 273786 10610 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 396.50 273787 10599 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 769.00 352829 10127/2011 101091 ZIEGLER INC 809.09 WINDOWS 00005426 273599 PC001322852 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.11- CREDIT 00005512 273651 PR000122879 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 794.98 4,267,233.99 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 4,267,233.99 Total Payments 4,267,233.99 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 426,923.84 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 11,629.96 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 3,900.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,648,979.19 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 9,089.80 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 261,006.42 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,627.26 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 158.39_ 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 151.21 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 4,958.19 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 81,365.57 05600 EDINBOROUGFUCENT LAKES FUND 57,586.73 05800 LIQUOR FUND 166,871.55 05900 UTILITY FUND 906,895.44 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 685,395.70 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 694.74 Report Totals 4,267,233.99 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 10/27/2011 - 10127/2011 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City 10/26/2011 7:49:54 Page - 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 8/26/11- 9/26/11 Card Holder lerchar Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City: State Code WAYNE HOULE 2011/09/13 $125.00 TRAINING WAYNE HOULE - 2011/09/14 $15184 TRAINING LODGING WAYNE HOULE 201.1/09/15 $20.62. FLAG POLE KEYS WAYNE HOULE 2011/09/23 $76.92 TRAINING LODGING WAYNE`HOULE 2011/09/23 $76.92- TRAINING LODGING WAYNE HOULE 2011/09/23 $76.92 TRAINING LODGING WAYNE HOULE 2011/09/23 $76.92 TRAINING LODGING JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/08/27 $126.46 GENERAL SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/08/30 . $35.61.` EQUIPMENT RENTAL JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/09/06 $65.99 YOUTH SUMMER PROGRAM JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/09/08 .$324.76 SOCKS JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/09/09 $28.95 TABLE ROLL 40X100 JOHN KEPRIOS 201 - 1/09/13 $48:27 POPCORN JOHN`KEPRIOS 2011/09/20 $100.00 POSTAGE JEFF LONG 2011/0.8/25 $19.35 STAFF MEETING JEFF LONG 2011/08/25 $26:00 BIRTH CERTIFICATE CHARGES JEFF LONG 2011/08/29 $213.22 PANASONIC KEYBOARD JEFF LONG 2011108/31' $148188 HEATGEAR TACTICAL SHIRTS JEFF LONG 2011/09/08 $293.00 LIFEPAK 500 JEFF LONG 2011/09/13 $302.65 PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK JEFF-LONG 2011/09/13-- $120.00 NOTARY RENEWAL JEFF LONG 2011/09/16 $160.89 GPS JEFF LONG 2011/09/19 $160.90 GPS JEFF LONG 2011/09/21 $173:50 DAILY PLANNER REFILLS JEFF LONG 2011/09/22 $123.83 LAPTOP PARTS JEFF LONG 2011/09/22 $263.55 K -9 CONVENTION DEB MANGEN 2011109/09 .$38.00 CONFERENCE - BENNETT DEB MANGEN 2011/09/13 $44.00 CITIZEN ADVISORY,BOOK DEB MANGEN 2011/09/19 -$99.39 LEAN MEETING DEB MANGEN .2011/09/21 $79.68 GRANDVIEW MEETING SCOTT NEAL 2011/08/30. $66.05 MEETING SCOTT NEAL :2011/08/31 $493:53 CONFERENCE SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/01 $27.65 MEETING SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/07 $181.40 TRAVEL CHICAGO -NEAL SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/07 $181.40 TRAVEL CHICAGO - WALLIN SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/07. $181.40 TRAVEL CHICAGO -KURT SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/07 $181:40. TRAVEL CHICAGO- ROGGEMAN Pagel TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPF 763- 5515300 _ MN 1281.6104 AMERICAS BEST VALUE INK HINCKLEY MN =- 1281.6104 D.B ROBERTS COMPANY 978-6587000.-. MA' 1552.6406 AMERICAS BEST VALUE INS HINCKLEY MN 1281.6104 AMERICAS BEST VALUE INK HINCKLEY MN 1281.6104 AMERICAS BEST VALUE INK HINCKLEY MN 1281.6104 AMERICAS BEST VALUE INS HINCKLEY MN 1281.6104 WWW:DICKSSPORTNGGOC 877 - 846 -9997 PA 5630.6406 PB METER RENTAL 800- 228 -1071 CT 5621.6235 ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800- 2280475. NE 1624.6406 VISR WWW.VISR.NE NC 5620.5510 PARTY CITY #764 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1600:6406 TRIARCO GOOD TIME ATTF 920- 5685511 MN 4075.5510 PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468' =8454 CT 5621.6235 LUNDS #2- EDINA MN -1400.6106 MN DEPT HEALTH VITAL RC SAINT PAUL MN 1400.6406 NORTHERN LIGHTS SSL INC619 =947 -7081 CA 1400.6160 GAL *GALLS INC 800- 504 -0328: KY 1400.6203 NATIONAL CREATIVE ENT. 952 - 8901360 MN 1400.6406 PAYPAL *ANUNN 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1400.6160 SECRETARY OF STATE 651- 2011368 MN 1400.6105 BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1460.6406 BESTBUY.COM 00009944 888 - 237 - 8289 - MN 1400.6160 DTI *DAY- TIMERS INC 7800- 805 -2615 PA 1400.6513 CODE MICRO 760- 806 -2731 CA 1400.6160 AMERICINN DETROIT LAKE DETROIT LAKE: MN 1400.6104 SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 7545 -0505 MN 1100.6104 UNC CH SCHOOL OF GOVT. 919 - 966 -1040 NC 1120.6405 D BRIAN'S DELI 46 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1500.6103 D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 .,-.MINNEAPOLIS MN 1500.6406 EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120:6106 HOTELS.COM US 800- 299 -4606; WA 1120.6104 EDINA GRILL EDINA. MN 1.120.6106 DELTA AIR - 0062358703962 DELTA.COM CA 1500.6103 DELTA AIR 0062358703963 DELTA.COM , CA 1500.6103 DELTA AIR 0062358703965 DELTA.COM. CA - 1500.6103 DELTAAIR 0062358703964 °DELTA.COM CA 1500.6103 $7,363.90 Page 2 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 8/26/11- 9/26/11 Card Holder lerchar Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code SCOTT NEAL 2011/00/07 $181.40 TRAVEL CHICAGO -MARK RUFF DELTA AIR 0062358703966 DELTA.COM CA 1500.6103 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/15 $30.08 MEETING EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/16 $26.92 MEETING EDEN AVENUE GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 SCOTT NEAL 2011%09/17 $60.00 ICMA CONFERENCE DELTA AIR 0068253407623 MINN /ST PAUL MN 1120.6104 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/19 $19.32 ICMA CONFERENCE CAPITAL GRILLE00080275 MILWAUKEE WI 1120.6104 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/20 $60.00 ICMA CONFERENCE DELTA AIR 0068253253132 MILWAUKEE WI 1120.6104 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/20 $20.73 ICMA CONFERENCE MILLER BREWHOU20600656 MILWAUKEE WI 1120.6104 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/20 $20.98 ICMA CONFERENCE HILTON HOTELS MILWAUKEE WI 1120.6104 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/20 $3.00 ICMA CONFERENCE HILTON HOTELS MILWAUKEE WI 1120.6104 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/20 $10.37 ICMA CONFERENCE HILTON HOTELS F &B MILWAUKEE WI 1120.6104 SCOTT NEAL 2011/09/23 $18.00 PARKING 501 OPUS #0003 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1120.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2011/08/31 $75.47 AV SUPPLIES AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2210.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/06 $233.68 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/15 $231.97 LASER FAX WWW.NEWEGG.COM 800 - 390 -1119 CA 1550.6230 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/20 $95.17 LEAN MEETING DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1500.6103 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/20 $38.00 CONFERENCE - TEAGUE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 - 545 -0505 MN 1140.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/20 $244.16 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/21 $102.29 SMALL AREA PLAN PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1500.6103 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/21 $37.81 WALL MOUNT BRACKET MONOPRICE INC 909 - 989 -6887 CA 1470.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/21 $73.25 HRRC MEETING D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1504.6218 JOHN WALLIN 2011/09/21 $92.96 LEAN MEETING D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1500.6103 ROBERT WILSON 2011/08/25 $175.00 CONFERENCE - WILSON MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASS 763- 569 -3357 MN 1190.6104 ROBERT WILSON 2011/08/30 $37.49 DAILY PLANNER REFILL FRANKLINCOVEYPRODUCT•800- 819 -1812. UT 1190.6406 ROBERT WILSON 2011/08/31 $134.00 CONFERENCE LODGING RUTTGERS SUGAR LAKE L COHASETT MN 1190.6104 ROBERT WILSON 2011/09/01 $250.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASS 763- 569 -3357 MN 1190.6104 ROBERT WILSON 2011/09/13 $175.00 CONFERENCE -STULC MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASS 763- 569 -3357 MN 1190.6104 $7,363.90 Page 2 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date Otte • r \J v�p • h �roR�e REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.C. From: Cary Teague ® Action Planning Director Discussion Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -111 Lot Division at 5023 and 5025 Nob Hill Drive for Ms. Eva May Deadline January 15, 2011 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Lot Division. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Ms. Eva May is proposing to shift the existing lot line that divides 5023 and 5025 Nob Hill Drive for the purpose of moving the lot line off, and away from the existing single - family home at 5023 Nob Hill Drive. Planning Commission Recommendation: On October 12, 2011, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Lot Division, subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the Planning Commission Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -111 Planning Commission Staff Report, October 12, 2011 Draft minutes from the October 12, 2011 Edina Planning Commission meeting RESOLUTION NO. 2011-111 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION OF 5023 AND 5025 NOB HILL DRIVE WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: City of Edina DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Parcel 1 (5025 Nob Hill Drive): Lot 8, Block 1, Engstrom Mamie Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2 (5023 Nob Hill Drive): Lot 1, Block 1 Oak Ridge of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: Parcel 1 (5025 Nob Hill Drive): Lot 8, Block 1, Engstrom Mamie Addition, Except the South 32.50 feet, as Measured at right angles to said south line, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2 (5023 Nob Hill Drive): Lot 1, Block 1 Oak Ridge of Edina, together with that part of Lot 8, Block 1 Engstrom Mamie Addition, the south 32.50 feet as measured at right angles to the south line of Lot 8, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-111 Page Two Adopted this 1St day of November, 2011. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 1, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of '2011. City Clerk A. �4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague October 12, 2011 2011.012.11a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Ms. Eva May is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides 5023 and 5025 Nob Hill Drive by 32.5 feet for the purpose of moving the existing lot line away from the existing house at 5023 Nob Hill Drive. The applicant owns both of these properties. The existing lot line is located through a corner of the north end of the existing home. The property at 5025 Nob Hill Drive is vacant. The applicant wishes to sell the property, and would like to eliminate the encroachment of the house on to the adjacent lot. (See the property location and proposed lot line shift on pages Al A7.) Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land uses are all single - family homes zoned and guided low - density residential. (See pages Al —A5.) Existing Site Features A large single - family home is located on the southern lot. The northern lot is heavily wooded and vacant. A large wetland is located on the west side of these lots. Both lots combined are 73,463 square feet in size. (See the existing home on page A5.) The vacant lot at 5025 Nob Hill is 34,761 square feet in size. The lot at 5023 Nob Hill is 38,702 square feet in size. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low- density residential Zoning: R -1, Single- family residential Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. The resulting lot line shift does not create an additional lot. As demonstrated below, both lots would still exceed the median lot size in the neighborhood. Minimum Lot Requirements Existing 5023 Nob Hill Existing 5025 Nob Hill Proposed 5023 Nob Hill Proposed 5025 Nob Hill Lot Area — 23,000 s.f. 38,702 s.f. 34,761 s.f. 46,963 s.f. 26,500 s.f. Lot Width —100 feet 100 feet 150 feet 132 feet 117 feet Lot Depth —180 feet 350 feet 200 feet 350 feet 200 feet Any new construction on either of these two lots would be subject to conformance with all of the City's rules and regulations regarding lot coverage, building height, setbacks and curb cuts. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5023 and 5025 Nob Hill Drive: Approval is subject to the following findings`. 1. The existing and proposed lots meet all minimum lot size requirements. 2. The lot line shift eliminates the encroachment of the home on to the adjacent lot. 3, Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. 2.. Any new curb cuts would be subject to review and approval of the engineering department. Deadline for a city decision: January 15, 2011 N City of Edina 13709 smssml 14/7 6100 17 NII 6411_ 12 � 1 14}7 SIH 6409 640" 6109 NW Legend 6421 6416 1 �; 61 ; NVpnlighted fbahire 6405 6509 6416 NTI N7/ t/ f1 3611-6116- 53 -117 14/7 1417 409 6307 6511 6425 1 N2S N'e— 1 li 6121 6417 N/6 14}7 6416 He-* Number L b016 ri 64!} N21 Nn 6415 M/3 Nil _! 1470 SU"t He— L.Wi; 6171 SITS 61 64376113 N11 6171— 1 N29 1471 6473 64t1 a 1413 Ntl T 5011330 6513 NN _Il 128— 6�77�61.it 6113 -6171 < City Limits 83^07 611176 1_61/0 MI9 —dig/ �W1J7 64]2 6477 N72 6313 6450 i_SlIO 6433 -642 NIS H7J 6117 ,�. Cn6k6 8113 -6111 6317 3303 1500 6301 6500 6301 6500 8301 65TH ST L61k. N6me6 6519 .:'6301 6306 6301 500 6501 6300 6309 6305 6301 SSOB 6.100 IAMB \ 6510 6501 t83Tf X6366 6317 6512 6�� U PeAs 370 \!6573 ''1� 6312 Harm�M�i� f M 71 6316 6371 6517 6517 8515 6312 8309 6300 6509 6501 0329 ism 63N P6rc616 &721 6626 25 65N 6317 6516 6321 6513 6317 0312 6317 3316 6311 OS73 63m i 6577 6321 652E ]2 i W 6312 651 6311 3 052! * 652! 6526 637. 6537 $SK1 36641 6311 529 N12 .1770 6576 6N1 :6NS 0510 65.11 8329 6521 Bile 6377 71d 6600 w eQOf 6600 660f 6600 6661 3600 37 3601 —5 e�H OM 6614 6605 e6H $101 SNS aN1 1000 6601 4905 6614 6600 6666 1 I IB09 6101 6600 6609 NH iS Oe00 21 6606 NO3 6612 — }1 6612 N12 5109 3029 6605 SB1T O61t 6617 6611 3027 3012 N10 19 N/6 6616 � 6617 6609 6604 6676 6417 6616 N21 Nf0 N17 71 96/6 141 6011 6606 2321 e671 Stls 5237 6671 6625 5130 'AIS 3010 Nt0 dd20 I p"27 642d 3129 \2J NTS 00M 0017 1r312 6611 21 St73 _ 90:7 sooe N70 1611 6311 6471 6616 11 65140 lTJe 5t St17 52" 5700 J 1 �Y1: 3013 5001 H>r p/! 662e 8373 1s 5237 6629 5217 1164....� SO/5 5000 6763 14]2 61 67 0 0 STOP "' T1i 5731 6801 8000 rK 3111 3112 177 1111 3177 3125 5117 Z 6103 6814 5300 5173 1Ii /51+7 3140 117 IG1 Ho3 9/0/ SfPe 5112 •sftt sf6j /a 3121lI 0311 3101 5503 $IN 5103 5104 a 6613 BB11 s1N slos 5137 100 5101 5100 3101 6100 $ ee17.19/T +8011901! 5/33 2! r—Tt —� tl S1m stiff �� s+sd, s1m sroo 31St 6111 5101 3100 6101 < 5111 5117 6563105 3100 5105 1 51 05 $ 5144 $113 f7 3140 5112 5109 5100 $1 or bffe \�3157 5176 3171 6171 5113 5112 3117 1901 53 ,7!15314 $176 `\ Sit 5117 PID:0411621310037 5023 Nob Hill Dr Edina, MN 55439 AI ^ .� D �� 1 City of Edina 6577 6311 6511 6510 6516 - Legend HOUCe Numbe1 Labels 6370 i 65]7 v 6525 t 6525 632! 6574 8575 Street Name Labels 6511 � 6511 v City Lim1Ys �� 6515 6310 6514 6529 691d 6519 B52a 65]] n7457ey — ❑ Lake Names Lakes 6601 6600 6601 5077 Parks 6605 6604 5101 3045 50111 6601 Parceh L .J 6609 6606 6605 6600 yy> N - -- 6617 3109 6611 6617 9079 SOI7 5012 6610 6618 6821 6617 11 6675 5180 6619 3013 5010 6670 � 6679 5017 $204 24 74 24 3700 5019 5006 6670 6674 � 6611 5991 o eras 21 i sf 5164 sou 5ooa 6709 5160 105 5156 5152 5118 5009 6717 6636 5201 41 5111 5003 5001 5161 DA 3137 5140 5176 4917 1812 4906 4904 5137 9119 6131 1900 5I45 5141 104 S1IJ M28 H PAy7 p9G7 5100 5177 x 5140 5177 3124 3176 5179 Z 5172 4917 4917 1909 4905 3128 51 N 5115 a $ 5120 in 'f1 5120 ��'4�0 5121 _ 6801 S1fe a 5116 5'41 5117 �y0 __.. 5177 6177 5129 5123 5111 P' 5117 � 5171 6805 5117 $loa sn7 3117 5112 ..r,ka4s co"c�— M 5109 9109 sloe 5104 0 6809 Tun 0 1 PID:0411621310037 ° 5023 Nob Hill Dr Edina, MN 55439 I f�F s OII � • �,1`'h] Pcin A'iY� • tin el �� 1 A3 City of Edina Legend House Number Labels 66D5 Street Name Label. ./ City Umfb 5109 5029 N� Croaks - - -� $077 3017 6610 0 Lek* Names Lek" EJ Parks 6616 P —J. me 5025 �po 6620 i1N0 1 5023 / 5001 am N / / 71 N / / sm 7019 300( 71 1" Sol$ 3000 3100 5136 5132 5148 5009 3005 7001 3144 5126 S 73J 5149 5122 5145 stn :nwl5 Cmnyticloa>Dn 5126 0 tt 1 PID: 0411621310037 0 e r--I o ~ 5023 Nob Hill Dr S:) l Q $ Edina, MN 55439 t t4 • �Uttul/rlsv.'�Y' . 3232327 A3 Alf City of Edina Legand 9106 House Number Labels Street Name Labels ./ City Limits 31 q Creeks 7/ 6610 Lake Names Lakes Parks Parcels 16 2009 Aerial Photo SOS! "20 5760 9077 71 6670 I 3019 66]1 500/ 24 d 5161 I 1 !1 3167 d0o9 . 1u Noll C� 3140 Sim I a Ada 172 /q 1 N r.e..r..e6.ars lci wasoam 116 +r ' I PID: 0411621310037 y 0 e 5023 Nob Hill Dr t Y Q tie L, Edina, MN 55439 � -- + �0'�rillronASY � • ll 77777 Alf AWI City of Edina Legend House Number 40e1s e� Street Name Lab, 1. City Limits Creak. E] Lake Name. _ + c Lj Parka Parcal. O 's 5 2009 A.,W Pnota «a k� Ty 3013 y14 � 4� � fk .',ir 'y�n i „� 4 �'? k 5 .t 5019 � X .•n w.us Gm,-e.lCl.oas oe” y 0 1 PID:0411621310037 v 5023 Nob Hill Dr �v Edina, MN 55439 � - 1ry�511 P JR n'{Y� • J J IM AWI -rl C 1447c 1 W 3 m U) m 1 w Z W • 11 _ _PROPOSZ2— LOT. LINE _-- - - - - -- 1 -_N-89 °23'52" E -- 250.92 -- —I -- I —R=--Y9- 7. 18 l 1 � hl NI d= 03 °10' 11" 1 1 azea sFI L =33.04 1 I 37.59 -- -1 — 257.28 ✓ CI utlilty 219.69 Easement - �l 11 N 8902J'52 �E - - 377.30 Proposed Descriptions EX /S TING Lot 1 Block 1 Oak Ridge of Edina together with that part of, HOUSE \Q Lot 8 Block 1 Engstrom Mamie Addition, #5023 The South 32.50 feet u measured at J / 70 `O Right angles to the south h line of Lot 8, Hennepin County Minnesota 0 Containing 46,963 square feet 1 1 1 1 S 89 °23' 52" W 350.74 VACANT LOT z � C �d w N� � � N (T n O� m � 01\ w v C O " U' ov �O tK h &.XISTAU (. LOT S 0 T -0 I 0� D J cnw p d �C) b0� �O W J Z w �zcr � -i C wad �cz° tYdw(14 d 0 Lr) c0 w 0) W N _ 194.87 _ — — — 0 30 60 90 C 1 H SCALE WS jg�ET 1 --P VACANT LOT Y � 1 o Proposed Description O rJ TR 1 ro N Lot 8 Block 1 Engstrom Mamie Addition, / 92 0 n m o Except the South 32.50 feet, as Measured at, 1 Right angles to said south line, Hennepin County Minnesota a 1 " Containing 26 500 square feet -rl C 1447c 1 W 3 m U) m 1 w Z W • 11 _ _PROPOSZ2— LOT. LINE _-- - - - - -- 1 -_N-89 °23'52" E -- 250.92 -- —I -- I —R=--Y9- 7. 18 l 1 � hl NI d= 03 °10' 11" 1 1 azea sFI L =33.04 1 I 37.59 -- -1 — 257.28 ✓ CI utlilty 219.69 Easement - �l 11 N 8902J'52 �E - - 377.30 Proposed Descriptions EX /S TING Lot 1 Block 1 Oak Ridge of Edina together with that part of, HOUSE \Q Lot 8 Block 1 Engstrom Mamie Addition, #5023 The South 32.50 feet u measured at J / 70 `O Right angles to the south h line of Lot 8, Hennepin County Minnesota 0 Containing 46,963 square feet 1 1 1 1 S 89 °23' 52" W 350.74 VACANT LOT z � C �d w N� � � N (T n O� m � 01\ w v C O " U' ov �O tK h &.XISTAU (. LOT S 0 T -0 I 0� D J cnw p d �C) b0� �O W J Z w �zcr � -i C wad �cz° tYdw(14 d 0 Lr) c0 w 0) F11 W � J CQ 0 C F11 10 v r o O Re c5p LY 100.0 , °moo t'+ '9 ko�'N�� ° 325 y�Eayy0 ornp \� O or P. ------ _ _ --1 A I I Drainage & Utility F Easement New Utility & Drainage of ,�� o �, � •fig 132.5 0.a I I Easement I I Z c, \ I 5 ' I -O0 rn OR co a m I• p E til� o lo, Co G �Im m to NS Cri rrt c CL w iV rCr F- I I 5' ao 0G o N O n fn - 0 O C I q H+ y VI N I IQ K) ° Tn J OI c ° E •o' H I I ti_ o � E' �•ry 1 o. � I ti O I II{ I Q N O O E E o. I I� N of ,�� o �, � •fig 132.5 I .y ,y0 ar �. 25 3060 S eoN • ��3's� Sat�tl:t�n jTH �aazas u� / -I- � I N C CD �9 - 9 w 0 N\NG��QpP O 0 PROJECT NO. I 8WO PROPOSED LOT DAT T , 2011 PAGE RETS LINE REALLIGNMENT Land HEREBY CEATFY THAT TH6 SI.RVEY WAS PREFAREO Frank R. C @rd8relle Surveyor Y AE OR UNDER WY ERVMM AND for 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE THAT I AN A DULY GTE LAM SI.AVEYOR 'iFf LAWS HE, STA E/OF LNESOTA. 5023 NOB HILL DR. EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 FRANK R CAR E . Ho. ssoe ` 952- 941 -3031 I I I I c, \ I .y ,y0 ar �. 25 3060 S eoN • ��3's� Sat�tl:t�n jTH �aazas u� / -I- � I N C CD �9 - 9 w 0 N\NG��QpP O 0 PROJECT NO. I 8WO PROPOSED LOT DAT T , 2011 PAGE RETS LINE REALLIGNMENT Land HEREBY CEATFY THAT TH6 SI.RVEY WAS PREFAREO Frank R. C @rd8relle Surveyor Y AE OR UNDER WY ERVMM AND for 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE THAT I AN A DULY GTE LAM SI.AVEYOR 'iFf LAWS HE, STA E/OF LNESOTA. 5023 NOB HILL DR. EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 FRANK R CAR E . Ho. ssoe ` 952- 941 -3031 Commissioner Staunton told the Commission they are all invited to attend the Grandview Small Area Plan open house /design charrette. The open house will stretch over three days beginning October 25 through the 27th. The first two days will be all day events and the final day; the 27th will be an evening event. Chair Grabiel thanked Staunton and asked the Commission and audience to note that the Planning Commission will not meet on the 26th of October. The Commission will next meet on November 9th. Chair Grabiel asked for a continuance vote. Commissioner Staunton moved to continue the Planning Commission meeting to November 9, 2011. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VI. REPORTSIRECOMMENDATIONS Karen Hurt, Assistant City Manager introduced herself to the Commission; stated she was happy to be in Edina and informed them of two issues she was working on in her capacity as Assistant City Manager — developing standard by -laws for all boards/ commissions and developing a survey for all board /commissions members eliciting their input on their perspective as Edina boards and commissions members. 2011.0012.11a Lot Division Eva May 5023/5025 Nob Hill Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Ms. Eva May is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides 5023 and 5025 Nob Hill Drive by 32.5 feet for the purpose of moving the existing lot line away from the existing house at 5023 Nob Hill Drive. The applicant owns both of these properties. The existing lot line is located through a corner of the north end of the existing home. The property at 5025 Nob Hill Drive is vacant. The applicant wishes to sell the property, and would like to eliminate the encroachment of the house on to the adjacent lot. Both lots combined are 73,463 square feet in size. The vacant lot at 5025 Nob Hill is 34,761 square feet in size. The lot at 5023 Nob Hill is 38,702 square feet in size. The resulting lot line shift does not create an additional lot. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5023 and 5025 Nob Hill Drive: Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The existing and proposed lots meet all minimum lot size requirements. 2. The lot line shift eliminates the encroachment of the home on to the adjacent lot. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. 2. Any new curb cuts would be subject to review and approval of the engineering department. Discussion /Comments Commissioner Carpenter asked Planner Teague if the existing home would meet all setback requirements after the lot line readjustment. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Motion Commissioner Staunton moved lot division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 'Y"ne n*- � 1� 0i�O REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. D. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Engineering Services For Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for the Feasibility Study and Bid Documents for Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project. Info /Background: This proposal is for the feasibility study and bid documents for the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project. SEH, Inc. has successfully conducted engineering services for many Edina neighborhood roadway reconstruction projects. This proposal also includes the bidding documents if the Council orders the project at the project hearing in January. The estimated fee for this work is $387,860, which is approximately 9% of the estimated reconstruction cost. ATTACHMENTS: Engineering Proposal Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project g: \pw \central svcs \eng div \projects \Impr nos \bo388 richmond hills parkj2012j \odmin \legal \Item Md. engineering servlces for richmond hills park neighborhood roadway reconstruction.docx SEH SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT October 25, 2011 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works and City Engineer City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina MN 55439 -3037 Dear Wayne: 9 RE: City of Edina Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements SEH No. EDINA 118348 10.00 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.® (SEH) sincerely thanks you for the opportunity to assist the City of Edina (City) with the Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Project (Project). We will provide our services as described by our task hour budget (THB) enclosed with this. Supplemental Letter Agreement to our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated July 25, 1988, herein called the Agreement. Based on bid tabs for similar projects adjusted to 2012 dollars, the estimated reconstruction cost is $4.3 million. Our proposed not to exceed fee of $387,860 reported by our THB is 9.0% of the estimated reconstruction cost. Our not -to- exceed fee includes reimbursable expenses. If the City accepts this Supplemental Letter Agreement, we will bill the City monthly on an hourly basis for services, expenses, and equipment to complete our work in the project area described by the enclosed map labeled Figure 1. Our anticipated project production schedule is given in the table below. Work Item Work Work Item Description Work Item Key Item No. Milestone Date 1 Begin work on the Feasibility Study November 2, 2011 2 Contact CenterPoint Energy about Reconstructing their November 7, 2011 Gas Main Trunk and Service Pipes in the Project Area 3 Mail Kick -off Newsletter and Questionnaire to Residents November 8, 2011 in the Project Area 4 Due Date for Residents to Submit Their Completed November 17, 2011 Questionnaire to the City for Tabulation 5 Neighborhood Meeting November 29, 2011 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax Mr. Wayne Houle, PE October 25, 2011 Page 2 Work Item Work Item No. Work Item Description Work Item Key Milestone Date 6 Deliver the Draft Report to City Staff for Review December 16, 2011 7 Public Improvement Hearing January 17, 2012 8 Begin Advertising for Bids March 1, 2012 9 Open Bids March 20, 2012 10 CenterPoint Energy Begins Field Work to Reconstruct Gas Main Trunk and Service Pipes in the Project Area Aril 9 2012 p ' 11 Begin Construction May 7, 2012 This Supplemental Letter Agreement, Figure No. 1, the THB, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. Thanks again for considering using SEH for this project. As always, please contact me with questions or comments at 952.912.2611 or ppasko @sehinc.com. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Paul J. Pasko III, PE Project Manager tin Enclosures c: Toby Muse, SEH (without Enclosures by e-mail only) Brent Theroux, SEH (without Enclosures by e-mail only) pAae\ekdina \I 18348 \I- grnl\IO- conuwu\pmposahprop Itrtichmond hills 10251I.docx map acknowledges Met SEH shall wt ba Fable for any damages which wise oul of the use/s amen or use of Sala pmNded. S EH Task Hour Budget City of Edina Richmond Hills Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements (63) October 25, 2010 Page 1 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT TASKS FEASIBILITY STUDY PHASE 1.0 Data Collection 1.1 Collect Data from the City 1.1.1 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Tapes/Disks and Logs (1) 1.1.2 Verify Utili as- builts from City 1.1.3 Digital parcel mapping from the City 1.1.4 List of working water main gate valves (88) 1.1.5 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan dated 7/03 prepared by BARR Engineering for the proiect area. 1.1.6 List of property owner information 5 1.1.7 Locations of sanitary sewer blockages 1.1.8 Sanitary sewer manhole structure survey data (91) 1.1.9 Previous soil boring logs and /or test results 1.1.10 Trunk water main pipe repair type and locations 90 1.1.11 To o ra hic survey completed by City staff 1.1.11.1 3D base drawing file 1.1.11.2 3D topographic survey point files 1.1.12 Investigate with City staff available sites for a contractor storage yard 6 1.1.13 Aerial mapping 1.1.13.1 Photograph 61 1.1.13.2 Contours 62 1.1.14 Latest versions of proposal form, instructions to bidders, general conditions, special conditions, City of Edina standard specifications and standard plates for inclusion in the vroiect manual 1.1.15 Existing driveway hoto a hs 1.2 Gopher State One Call 1.2.1 Obtain Ticket No. 1.2.2 Collect atlases from private utility companies in the ro'ect area Page 1 of 13 Page 2 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT TASKS 1.3 Supplemental Topographic Survey 92 Subtotal Labor Cost $5,666 2.0 Geotechnical Investigation 4 2.1 Review City Subsurface Investigation Program 3 2.2 Assist Geotechnical Drilling/Testing Services 19 2.3 Develop soil strati rah / rofile 2.4 Assess trench excavation and backfill 2.5 Assess road subgrade (including intermixing of trench backfill soils 2.6 Assess feasibility of HDD for installation of storm sewer and drainage features 2.7 Evaluate proposed roadway typical section 2.8 Evaluate the feasibility of utilizing existing pavement section as a reclaimed aggregate base product into the Proposed street section 2.9 Prepare Draft Geotechnical Technical Memorandum 2.10 Prepare Final Geotechnical Technical Memorandum 2.11 Comment on final geotechnical details during bid document preparation 103 Subtotal Labor Cost $11,914 3.0 Kick -off Newsletter & Questionnaire 3.1 Prepare kickoff newsletter text and ma 94 97 3.2 Print newsletter, questionnaire and mailing labels 25 3.3 Prepare draft questionnaires text 95 96 97 3.4 Tabulate Kick -off Questionnaire Results 7 Subtotal Labor Cost $3,324, 4.0 Field Inspection (69) 4.1 Inspect storm sewer manholes and storm sewer catch basins 8 9 4.2 Inspect existing curb and gutter for reincorporation into the project 57 4.3 Inspect existing pavement for limits of alligator cracking to indicate presence of subgrade soils needing repair (58) 4.4 Observe storm water runoff during a rain event Subtotal Labor Cost $4,883 Page 2 of 13 Page 3 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT TASKS 5.0 Street / Pavement Design (64) (65) (66) (84) 5.1 Develop street pavement sections (2 )(60) 5.2 Evaluate narrowing of Windsor Ave / Kent Ave and Kent Ave / Warwick PI intersections and associated driveway impacts 55 5.3 Determine the locations and depths of subgrade repairs (2 )(58) 5.4 Investigate adding a sidewalk along 56th Street from the frontage road to Code Ave 93 5.5 Prepare 30% complete tabulation of removals and miscellaneous restoration Subtotal Labor Cost $22,465 6.0 Drainage / Storm Sewer Design (14)(45) 6.1 Prepare layout of proposed storm sewer extensions /new systems 11 6.2 Identify t ibutary areas 12 6.3 Calculate runoff coefficient "C" factor 12 6.4 Determine time of concentration "Tc" for tributary areas 6.5 Size proposed storm sewer pipes 13 6.6 Prepare approximate layout for proposed sump pump drain i e network 15 59 110 6.7 Design layout of draintile network based on recommended subcuts 6.8 Size storm water runoff treatment manholes (10) 6.9 Identify existing manholes, trunk pipes, and catch basins needing reconstruction in the project area 33 6.10 Investigate adjustments to the street profile in select locations to improve the flow of storm water runoff to existing and proposed catch basins Subtotal Labor Cost $11,316 7.0 Sanitary Sewer Design (70) 7.1 Study location of reported blockages in the trunk pipe network 36 7.1.1 Based on study, identify location of trunk pipe repairs by open cut methods 68 7.1.2 Based on study, identify location of trunk pipe repairs by trenchless methods 7.2 Service Pipe 7.2.1 Reconstruction Plan 39 7.3 Identify existing manholes needing reconstruction in the ro'ect area 37 Subtotal Labor Cost $5,132 Page 3 of 13 Page 4 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT TASKS W,-,7 8.1 Develop Suggested Staging Plan (5 1) 8.1.1 Evaluate Locations of Existing and Proposed Valves and Fire Hydrants 8.1.2 Evaluate Layout of Temporary Water Main and Water Services (50) 8.2 Trunk Pipe 8.2.1 Reconstruction Plan (52) 8.2.2 Relocate Fire Hydrant (38) 8.3 Service Pipe 8.3.1 Reconstruction Plan (99) t6tal L ibo O k'.: os -,0, 7 U 10.1 Streets 10.2 Storm Sewer 10.3 Sanitary sewer 10.4 Water Main Subt6ta 'cot 35,9 911 11.0 Prepare Engineer's ,pinidn of Prepare Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost (17) (18) Subtotal a r Cost $6,101 pie War -y 12.1 Count single family parcels 12.2 Input parcel information data into XLSX spreadsheet 12.3 Prepare reliminary roll 12.4 Account for special comer lots that received 1/2 or 1/3 rate assessments as part of a previous or future reconstruction proiect 12.5 Review reliminary roll with City staff 12.6 Use roll to generate public impro . vement hearing notices Subtotal Labor. C69t'. = $4'706 " 4 13.1 Write draft feasibility study (23) 13.2 Prepare project area location map figure 13.3 Prepare preliminary assessment role fi gure 13.4 Review draft study with City staff (86) 13.5 Pre are fmal study 13.6 Prepare and submit hard copies of the study 13.7 Prepare and submit PDF file of the study r U. a .Cost;: Is oia Abo' Page 4 of 13 Page 5 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT TASKS 14.0 Meetings 14.1 Kick -off meeting with City staff (56) 14.2 Letter to CenterPoint Energy (24) 14.3 Letter to other Private Utilities (106) 14.4 Review results of soils borings and draft geotechnical memo with City staff by conference call 14.5 Water Main Analysis 100 14.6 Nei hborhood Meeting 81 14.6.1 Prepare invitation to Neighborhood Meeting 25 26 14.6.2 Prepare preliminary assessment role graphic 72 14.6.3 Prepare hard copy of 30% complete tabulation of removals and miscellaneous restoration 87 14.6.4 Prepare plots summarizing improvements for use at the meeting 27 14.6.5 Prepare attendance roster sheets and attend Neighborhood Meeting 71 14.7 Public Improvement Hearin 14.7.1 Prepare invitations for Public Improvement Hearing and send via US Mail and place ad in Newspaper 25 26 14.7.2 Prepare for Public Improvement Hearin 29 14.7.3 Attend Public Improvement Hearin 28 82 14.8 Private Licensed Plumber Informational Meeting 14.8.1 Prepare Invitations to Plumber Informational Meeting (25)(26) 14.8.2 Prepare for Plumber Informational Meeting 107 14.8.3 Attend Plumber Informational Meeting 108 14.9 Private Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Reconstruction Meeting for Property Owners 14.9.1 Prepare Invitations to Private Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Reconstruction Meeting for Property Owners (25)(26) 14.9.2 Prepare for Private Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Reconstruction Meeting for Property Owners G 07 14.9.3 Attend Private Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Reconstruction Meeting for Property Owners 109 Subtotal Labor Cost $30,798 BID DOCUMENTS PHASE 15.0 Finalize Street / Pavement Design 15.1 Finalize design (30) (31) (73) (74) (75) Subtotal Labor Cost $27,121 16.0 Finalize Drainage / Storm Sewer Design 16.1 Storm Sewer Extensions and New System Design (32) 33 35 101 Subtotal Labor Cost $14,586 Page 5 of 13 Page 6 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT TASKS 17. .."L, A- iialize, Ahit ary, 17.1 Finalize Design (102) Subtotal, Labor Cost' .' gn ; 18.1 Finalize Design (104) Subtotal Labor Cost 04 D- o'c f M BU i 19.1 Plan sheets 19.1.1 Title Sheet 19.1.2 General Layout 19.1.3 Suggested Water Main Staging Plan (105) 19.1.4 Tabulation of earthwork 19.1.5 Tabulation of existing sanitary and storm sewer structure reconstruction or adjustment 19.1.6 Tabulation of existing sanitary sewer trunk pipe joint or spot repairs 19.1.7 Tabulation of removals and miscellaneous restoration 19.1.8 Typical pavement sections & List of Standard Plates 19.1.9 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (46) 19.1.10 Plan and Profile sheets (40)(76)(77) 19.1.11 Cross Section sheets (42) 19.2 Project Manual 19.2.1 Front End (43), 19.2.2 Bidding Requirements (79) 19.2.3 Conditions of Contract (85) 19.2.4 Specifications 19.2.5 Special Provisions 19.2.6 Appendix (44) Subtotal Labor Cosy 20.1 Refine Opinion of Probable Cost and Proposal Form from Feasibility Study (41) 20.1.1 Streets 20.1.2 Storm Sewer 20.1.3 Sanitary sewer 20.1.4 Water Main Subtotal Lab or-C x$11,450 '-' ;Review„ --t 21.1 Ci of Edina (48) 21.2 Minnehaha Creek Watershed' District (89) 21.2.1 Gradiniz and Earthmoving Permit (80) 21.3 Private Utility Companies 21.4 NTCA 21.4.1 NPDES Permit/SWPPP (34) total! Labor. Cost Page 6 of 13 P:\AE \E \Edina \118348 \1 - genl \10 - contracts \Proposal \[SEH THB Richmond Hills Council.xlsx]THB NOTES 1 For the inspection of the trunk sanitary sewer pipes in the project area. 2 Typical sections and subcut locations will be per the geotechnical memorandum prepared for the feasibility study. 3 Task includes reviewing City's Request For Proposal (RFP) for geotechnical drilling and testing services. RFP, including final boring locations, to be developed by City with input from SEH. Official RFP to be distributed by the City to contract geotechnical services. Page 7 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY PROJECT TASKS 22.0 Subtotal Hours Meetings Subtotal Labor Cost 22.1 Subtotal SEH Expenses 53 With City Staff Subtotal $159,122.94 22.1.1 Review 90% Plan set Meeting Subtotal Hours 1,921 22.2 Subtotal Labor Cost $225,787.06 Letter to CenterPoint Energy 24 Subtotal SEH Expenses 53 $ 2,950.00 Subtotal $228,737.06 Subtotal Labor Cost $3,559 23.0 Bidding Assistance 54 23.1 Prepare Ad for Bids 23.2 Prepare Electronic Bid Documents 83 23.2.1 Plans 23.2.2 Pro'ect Manual 23.3 Respond to Bid Inquires 23.4 Prepare ecessary Addenda 23.5 Attend Bid Opening 23.6 1 JPrepare'l abulation of Bids 23.7 Print pap er copies of plans and project manual 49 Subtotal Labor Cost $14,105 P:\AE \E \Edina \118348 \1 - genl \10 - contracts \Proposal \[SEH THB Richmond Hills Council.xlsx]THB NOTES 1 For the inspection of the trunk sanitary sewer pipes in the project area. 2 Typical sections and subcut locations will be per the geotechnical memorandum prepared for the feasibility study. 3 Task includes reviewing City's Request For Proposal (RFP) for geotechnical drilling and testing services. RFP, including final boring locations, to be developed by City with input from SEH. Official RFP to be distributed by the City to contract geotechnical services. Page 7 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY FEASIBILITY STUDY PHASE Subtotal Hours 1,292 Subtotal Labor Cost $157,191.32 Subtotal SEH Expenses 53 $ 1,931.62 Subtotal $159,122.94 BED DOCUMENTS PHASE Subtotal Hours 1,921 Subtotal Labor Cost $225,787.06 Subtotal SEH Expenses 53 $ 2,950.00 Subtotal $228,737.06 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $387,860.00 P:\AE \E \Edina \118348 \1 - genl \10 - contracts \Proposal \[SEH THB Richmond Hills Council.xlsx]THB NOTES 1 For the inspection of the trunk sanitary sewer pipes in the project area. 2 Typical sections and subcut locations will be per the geotechnical memorandum prepared for the feasibility study. 3 Task includes reviewing City's Request For Proposal (RFP) for geotechnical drilling and testing services. RFP, including final boring locations, to be developed by City with input from SEH. Official RFP to be distributed by the City to contract geotechnical services. Page 7 of 13 4 Task assumes that a materials testing firm will enter into a contract directly with the City for the geotechnical field work and testing. 5 List will be an XLSX file containing at a minimum property address, property owner name, property owner address, and PID number. 6 Includes investigating sites to stock pile pipe and reclaimed aggregate base materials, produced on -site. 7 XLSX spreadsheet containing tabulated results of the questionnaire sent by the City to SEH. 8 We will inspect only structures with insufficient data gathered from the City's storm. sewer structure survey project. We will only 'inspect structures within the street rights -of -ways. 9 If additional inspection is needed, inspection results will be compiled on.paper structure survey forms. Whenever possible, City supplied manhole and catch basin numbers will be used for identification purposes. 10 Involves evaluation and design of City approved style of storm water treatment structures at the intersection ofNorman Ct and Normandale Ct and near 5045 Yvonne Ter. 11 Scope of this task includes the design of storm sewer extensions from the intersection of Warwick PI and Kent Ave to the north and upsizing the existing system if deemed necessary. The scope of the ,extensions will be determined based on resident questionnaires and a field visit during a rain event. 12 Consult Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan dated 7/03 for the City of Edina prepared by 'BARR Engineering. Back check against existing air flown contour mapping of the project area. 13 Based on a 10 -year design storm. 14 As was the case for the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Project, no storm sewer design review by BARR will be required as part of this project. 15 Where there is no existing curb and gutter, the sump pump.drain pipe will be trenched into place behind the proposed curb and gutter. Where there is existing curb and gutter, the sump pump drain pipe may be horizontal directional drilled (HDD) into place behind the existing curb and gutter. 16 Residents will be asked about the desire to install a street lighting network in the questionnaire. We assume street lighting will not be included in the scope of this project. If the neighborhood does request this system, SEH and the City will negotiate a Supplemental Agreement for these services. 17 Costs will feature a 15% contingency factor. 18 Costs will be computed in 2012 dollars. 19 Includes a site visit to observe existing conditions, assistance with questions during drilling and testing, a review of collected soil samples, and recommendations for laboratory testing. Does not include staking borings in field. 20 Ju's'tification for assessments is attributed to properties receiving benefit from the new roadway and is established in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy. City staff will review the assessment graphic to ensure accuracy 'with the City's Special Assessment Policy. 21 Utility reconstruction costs will' not be assessed.to residents in-the project area. 22 The assessable lot is based on a detached single family home or REU. 23 Study's scope and format will follow the example set by the Feasibility Study for the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements'project dated January 18, 2011. 24 Identify with CenterPoint Energy gas main and service pipe reconstruction work within the project area that needs to be done prior to beginning street reconstruction activities. No meeting needed at this time. CenterPoint Energy will be notified of the project during the feasibility phase of this project and instructed to plan for existing facility re- locations. During the design phase, 90% complete plansheets will be submitted to assist CenterPoint Energy in their re- location planning. 25 Task includes preparation of an invitation/letter /questionnaire; printing, folding, and delivering invitations to Public Works; and the preparation of mailing labels. Page 8 of 13 26 City staff will insert letters /invitations /questionnaires into envelopes, apply postage and mail the letters /invitations from Public Works. 27 SEH will provide three (3) plots at a scale of 1 " =30'. Each plot will have as a base the aerial photo of the project area with 1. existing sanitary and storm sewer trunk pipes line work 2. existing watermain trunk pipe line work 3. topographic survey line work 4. property and right -of -way lines 5. street names and addresses, and 6.30% complete proposed improvements for curb and gutter, storm sewer, drain tile, sanitary sewer, water main and fire hydrant relocations and replacements. The plots will be taped to the wall during the meeting. These plots will become the basis for the bidding document plan set. 28 SEH will present a 10- minute long PPT file to the Council describing the project and answer resident and Council questions. 29 Preparations include creating a 10- minute long PPT file for presentation to the Council and residents. 30 Horizontal alignments and stationing will be assigned to all streets in the project area. 31 Vertical alignments will be assigned to all streets in the project area. Wherever possible, the profile of the existing pavement seam will be held constant. 32 Complete the detailed design of both storm sewer extensions and/or new systems shown in the feasibility study. 33 Repairs or replacements of existing storm sewer structures and pipes are based on recommendations from City staff and the structure condition surveys completed by SEH staff during its field inspection operations. 34 Includes having SEH water resources staff review the SWPPP for any recent rule changes prior to submitting to the MPCA. 35 Complete the detailed design of the sump pump drain pipe shown in the feasibility study. Place the sump pump drain pipe behind the concrete curb and gutter using open cut or HDD methods. Sump pump drain pipe may need to be proposed in a position in front of the curb and gutter at select locations. 36 Study is based on recommendations from City staff, results of the City supplied map showing recent blockage locations, and SEH's review of the CCTV inspection of the trunk pipes in the project area. 37 Sanitary sewer manhole reconstruction will be based on recommendations from City and SEH staff. Recommendations will be based on information gathered from the manhole inspection program. 38 All existing fire hydrants in the project area will be removed and replaced. Hydrants in front of residences will be relocated within the boulevard to be adjacent to the nearest common side -yard property line. Fire hydrants will be inserted to keep the spacing between fire hydrants under 400 -feet. 39 Includes determining the type of sanitary sewer service reconstruction technique used between the right - of -way line and the wye. Techniques will include open cut, CIPP lining, or pipe bursting. Techniques will be chosen to minimize impacts to existing landscaping features. 40 Task includes adding the private utility line work to the base mapping. 41 Use same applicable cost splits shown in the Feasibility Study. 42 Cross section plan sheets will be created for streets where curb and gutter is proposed or existing curb and gutter slopes need modification to improve drainage. 43 Contains title sheet, certification sheet, table of contents, contact sheet, instructions to bidders, and advertisement for bids. 44 Contains soil boring data, City standard plates, and SEH construction details. 45 We understand no storm water modeling of Melody Lake will be required due to the existing elevation of Meldoy Lake relative to the existing elevations of the storm sewer outlet pipes. It is anticipated that no new storm water will be introduced to Melody Lake. Task assumes we will evaluate outlet configurations for upsizing and/or erosion control since the proposed storm sewer extensions will likely increase the volume and velocitv of the storm water. Page 9 of 13 46 Contains information similar to that shown on the plan for Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project dated 3/2/11. 47 Task includes a separate tabulation of costs for Normandale Ct and Norman Ct in order for City Staff to determine if it will be designated as a separate improvement project. 48 Includes one (1) submittal of draft final bidding documents to the City in 11x17 format. 49 Print only enough copies for appropriate City and SEH staff. 50 Plan assumes that each house contains an operable shut -off valve just upstream of the water meter. 51 We will evaluate water main reconstruction and its staging plan since this will likely drive the overall phasing of the project. 52 We will evaluate water main rehabilitation techniques including open cut vs. cured in place pipe (CIPP) lining vs. pipe bursting as part of the feasibility report and suggest a preferred method to the City. 53 Reimbursable expenses during study and bid document bidding assistance phase includes mileage and printing costs. 54 Does not include a pre -bid meeting. 55 Task will evaluate turning movements, potential sight line issues, and driveway access to create two (2) intersection layouts per intersection. The layouts will be presented to the property owners at the Neighborhood Meeting. 56 This task was already completed on 10/18/11 with Pasko, Muse, Houle and Sullivan in attendance. 57 Using City supplied inspection criteria, we will visually field inspect the condition of the existing curb and gutter to quantify existing curb and gutter removal and reconstruction incorporated into the project. 58 We will visually field inspect the cracked conditions of the existing streets to estimate the amount of subgrade repair needed. 59 Sump pump drain pipe network will be a combination of HDPE, PVC, and C900 PVC sump drain pipe that contain service pipe stubs at each home for existing or future sump pump discharge connections. 60 Includes evaluating the feasibility of producing reclaim aggregate base and reincorporating it into the proposed street section. 61 City/Hennepin County will supply SEH the latest aerial photograph of the project area. 62 The City will supply SEH with the latest airflown contours. We understand that the contours are not to be exclusively trusted. Contours will be checked for accuracy against the City supplied topographic survev. 63 Tree removal shall only become necessary in extreme circumstances of reconstruction where no other feasible option exists to mitigate damage caused by reconstruction activities. 64 Residential area safety improvements are not included in the scope of this project. 65 Bicycle issues are not included "in the scope of this project. 66 Reconstruction of traffic control and street name signage is not included in the scope of this project. SEH recommends City staff review the condition of the street sign poles to determine if replacement should be added to this project. If signs are to be replaced, this shall be done by supplemental agreement: 67 Based on preliminary discussions with the City, we understand the entire existing water main trunk and service pipe network (up to and including existing curb stops) should be replaced in the project area. SEH will evaluate the extent of water main repair locations utilizing existing water main break information, further discussion with City staff and review of existing water main as -built drawings. 68 Type of rehabilitation will be a "spot" repair(s). 69 SEH assumes we will not inspect sanitary sewer manholes because the City has already done this work as part of their on -going sanitary sewer manhole inspection program. Page 10 of 13 70 Reconstruction of private sanitary sewer service pipes between the right -of -way line and the wye is included in the scope of this project. Homeowners will be. given the 'opportunity to reconstruct_ their sanitary sewer service pipe from the right -of- -way line to the wye prior to street reconstruction activities at their own cost. 71 Preparations include creating a 10- minute long PPT file for presentatiogto the residents made by SEH staff. Homeowner comments will be recorded on the 1 " =30' summary plots. A hard copy of the XLSX file summarizing resident responses' to the kick-off questionnaire will be brought to this meeting as. a reference document. 72 SEH will provide three (3) plots of the assessment role graphic taped to the, wall next to one (1) 1 " =30' plot outlining proposed improvements. See footnote 27. The assessment role`graphic will be a parcel map with addresses and street names and each parcel shaded in a color explaining the`amount of their estimated assessment. 73 Create intersection grading plans. These plans will not appear in the bid document plan set. Instead they will be utilized in the field by SEH surveyors staking the reconstruction. 74 Tabulation of removals and miscellaneous restoration -.arranged and• sorted in order of ascending house number and street name. Subtotaled per street name. Totaled by neighborhood:. Tabulation includes sawcutting; boulevard removal and replacement; sanitary sewer wye repairs;.tree removal; pet _ containment, irrigation, any special driveway system repairs; and hand "conning curb and gutter near sensitive boulevard feature quantities. Notes for these items will not appear in the plan and profile sheets. 75 Tabulation of earthwork for insertion into the bid documents. Includes information�on a per street basis regarding gross common excavation, reclaim aggregate base production and placement, imported class 5 aggregate base, subgrade repairs, paving, topsoil borrow, and sodding. 76 Include street centerline profiles for all streets whether it is, new or existing, curb and gutter. Include profiles of existing public utilities only when proposed public utility work can interfere with the existing utilities. This may result in some sheets being plan/plan view rather than plan/profile view. 77 Plan view base mapping is based on line work from City topographic surveying. No aerial 'photos will be included on the bidding documents. 78 Quantity calculations will be captured.in a XLSX file that will be incorporated into the proposal form as part of the bidding document project manual and monthly pay applications utilized during reconstruction to track quantities and costs for each City funding source allocated for the project. 79 Includes proposal form, instructions to bidders, and advertisement for bids 80 SEH will prepare one (1) submittal letter transmitting review documents to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 81 Tentatively scheduled for 11/29/11. 82 Tentatively scheduled for 1/17/11: 83 Bid documents will be available for purchase via Quest CDN on the City's web site. 84 Wherever no existing curb and gutter is present, the street width will likely be 27 -feet face of curb to face of curb except where existing street widths are less than 25 -feet. Where existing curb and gutter is present and can be reincorporated into the project, the street width will not change. 85 Contains a Contractor Questionnaire similar to that shown on the bid documents for Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project dated 3/2/11. 86 SEH will collect City's review comments via conference call after SEH sends the draft study via PDF file attached to an email. Page 11 of 13 .l 87 Hard copy tabulation shall be 3 copies on 11x17 paper for resident reference while they look at the plot summarizing the improvements to be undertaken. 88 We will use this list during preparation of the suggested, staging plan. 89 We assume the entire project area is located in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and that the proiect will not result in a net increase in impervious surfaces. 90 Data provided in a tabular format as either a XLSX or DOCX file. Repairs located by address and arranged on a per street.basis. If necessary, this, information will appear in the Appendix of the project manual to assist bid preparation of pipe bursting or CIPP lining contractors, if determined a viable water main rehabilitation technique. 91 City will provide data as either a XLSX or DOCX file. If SEH determines the data to be.insufficient, the scope of the additional surveys needed will be negotiated between the City and SEH and added as a Supplemental Agreement. ✓ 92 During the course of the feasibility study and bid document preparation, additional topographic survey may be needed to supplement the City supplied survey. This task serves as a placeholder to collect additional survey data that may include driveways and boulevards. Assuming the City cannot do this supplemental surveying itself, actual hours based on the scope of the supplemental survey will be negotiated between the City and SEH and added as a Supplemental Agreement. 93 Investigation includes a feasibility design of the sidewalk's alignment based on the fewest conflicts with existing infrastructure and results of the resident questionnaires. Task assumes any sidewalk alignments created will be reviewed with property owners at the Neighborhood Meeting. No additional meetings will be held to review sidewalk design with the neighborhood. 94 Newsletter is a booklet created from 8.5x11 paper that contains four (4) pages of newsletter text, a four (4) page questionnaire and a map of the proiect area. 95 Questionnaires for residents to complete and return to City for tabulation of results. Questionnaire will be sent to all residents of the project area and will cover presence of local drainage problems, pet containment systems and the interest in street lighting. 96 Questionnaires will be on an 8.5x11 sheet of paper. 97 Includes submitting draft copies to the City and effecting City edits. 98 Not Used. 99 Includes removing and replacing existing water service pipes from the trunk water main pipe up to and including the existing curb stop. 100 Meet with City staff to discuss water main repair techniques including open cut vs. CIPP vs. pipe. bursting. Outcome of this meeting is the decision on which reconstruction method(s) to use. 101 Tabulate existing manhole or catch basin reconstruction or adjustment for inclusion in the bid document plan set. 102 Tabulate trunk pipe joint or spot repairs and manhole reconstruction/adjustments for insertion in bid document plan set. 103 Includes unit price estimates during development of engineer's opinion of probable cost. 104 Includes incorporation of recommended trunk water main rehabilitation techniques including open -cut, pipe bursting, and CIPP or combination thereof. 105 While plan will consider sanitary sewer; storm sewer; flatwork; grading and base; and topsoil and sodding operations; we anticipate water main reconstruction to be the work element that drives the plan. 106 Task will notify Xcel Energy, Comcast, and Qwest of the potential project to inquire whether or not they have any facilities in need of updating. If so, the private utility companies will be instructed to coordinate with the City the timing of this work prior to the start of the improvement project. Page 12 of 13 107 Preparations include creating a PPT file for presentation to.private plumbers / property owners and creation of a take -away technical memo for meeting attendees. Efficiencies will occur in creating both presentations and technical memos simultaneously. Therefore, less effort is shown for the property owner meeting compared to the plumber informational meeting. 108 SEH will present a PPT presentation4o the meeting attendees :describing the anticipated staging plan and what -the project's bid-documents define as acceptable sanitary sewer service pipe reconstruction methods and outcomes. Following,the presentation 'SEH and City staff will answer questions. 109 SEH will present a PPT presentation to the meeting attendees describing the impacts private sanitary sewer service pipe reconstruction will.have on resident properties and the possibilities of hiring the work by'a private plumber. SEH and City staff will answer resident questions before and after presentation. 110 Sump pump drain pipe and sump pump.drain service pipe design and quantities will be tabulated under the storm sewer improvement number. Page 13 of 13 Item IV. D. Page 4 of 13 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT TASKS 8 0 • .... , ,1...:. ':_, .- - < ' r! - '. ,.. Water ,... ,.. .. 41. - _ 8.1 . Develop Suggested Staging Plan (5 1) 8.1.1 Evaluate Locations of Existing 'and Proposed Valves and Fire Hydrants 8.1.2 Evaluate Layout of Temporary Water Main and Water Services (50) 8.2 Trunk Pipe 8.2.1 Reconstruction flan 52) 8.2.2 Relocate Fire Hydrant (38) 8.3 Service Pipe 8.3.1 Reconstruction. Plan (99) Subtofal Lah'or,Cost:.:: $24,073 90 Streeti Subtotal Labor,Cost +5 an R i alcu W � 3 u { f htieS Vi 10.1 Streets 10.2 Storm Sewer 163 Sanitary sewer 10.4 Water Main Subtotal abor Cost :: $5,981: _ 110 1' repave Engineer; s Opinion' of Pr`obalil'e� Cost X47) ,.. .,.. ? , 11.1 Prepare Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost 1 18 SubtofalLabor_Cost : ; . 12 b, Prelimma Assessirient -- 12.1 Count single family parcels 12.2 Input parcel information data into XLSX spreadsheet 12.3 Prepare preliminary roll 12.4 Account for special corner lots that received 1/33 or 2/3 rate assessments as part of a previous or future reconstruction roiect 12.5 Review relimina roll with City staff 12.6 Use roll to generate public improvement hearing notices r , subtotal Labor Cost ,: , ,,, $4,706, :. 4. 13.1 Write draft feasibility study (23) 13.2 Prepare project area location map figure 13.3 Prepare preliminary assessment role figure 13.4 Review draft study with City staff 86 13.5 Prepare final stud 13.6. Prepare and submit hard copies of the stud 13.7 Pre are and submit PDF file of the stud .: ...: ' ... Snb�otal Labor Cosh _� : ,: , . , -,• <:. ;: : _ ;520;831 ; ,..`. Page 4 of 13 of Ila REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. E. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Engineering Services for Tracy Avenue from Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for a Feasibility Study and Bid Documents to reconstruct Tracy Avenue from Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue. Info /Background: This proposal is for the feasibility study and bid documents to reconstruct Tracy Avenue from Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue. This project is scheduled in the current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 2011, which will be moved to 2012 in the proposed 2012- 2016 CIP. Tracy Avenue is a designated Municipal State Aid roadway. The proposed public process will be similar to the West 44th Street project, which consists of information meetings with residents and property owners to first cover the conditions of the corridor, then to look at what can be accomplished without adversely affecting the properties along the corridor. The proposal also includes analyzing the intersection of Benton Avenue and Tracy Avenue; we anticipate presenting the project to the Edina Transportation Commission prior to the project public hearing. Staff believes that a full transportation study, similar to West 70th Street, is not necessary for this corridor. ATTACHMENTS: Engineering Proposal Tracy Avenue Improvements g: \pw \central svcs \eng dlv \projects \Impr nos \ba368 tracy ove fr vernon- xtown \admin \legal \Item Iv. e. engineering services for tracy avenue from benton ave to vernon ave.docx WSB & Associates. Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction October 25, 2011 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works /City Engineer City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Tracy Avenue Improvements Proposal for Engineering Services Feasibility Study/Preliminary Design/Final Design City of Edina, MN Dear Mr. Houle: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) is pleased to submit the attached proposal for the Feasibility Study/Preliminary Design and Final Design/Construction Documents for improvements on Tracy Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue. Our proposal includes a scope of services with an estimated cost to complete those services and an anticipated schedule. This project involves the reconstruction of approximately 2,300 feet of Tracy Avenue. The existing roadway consists of a two -lane urban section with parking permitted only on the east side of the roadway. Sidewalk also extends along the east side of the roadway. Since the roadway is on the State Aid system and the City wishes to utilize State Aid funds for the project, it is anticipated that variances will need to be requested for meeting street width and allowable parking requirements set forth by State Aid rules. The intent of reconstructing the roadway would be to minimize impacts to the adjacent residential uses by maintaining the existing width and alignment, while still making improvements to the roadway and utility infrastructure systems. Roadway improvements will include reconstructing the roadway, replacement of existing concrete pavement and integral curb and gutter, installation of bike lanes in both directions, sidewalk replacement as needed and drainage improvements. Utility systems, including sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer will need to be evaluated to determine rehabilitation or repair methods needed. The project will also include evaluating the potential realignment of Benton Avenue from the existing offset intersection. This will require working with the School District on alternatives and possible right -of -way acquisition. Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer f Mr. Wayne Houle, PE City of Edina October 25, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Our project team will be led by Mr. Chuck Rickart, P.E., P.T.O.E. He will serve as project manager and coordinate all activities with the City. Mr. Rickart will be assisted by Mr Andrew Plowman P.E. who has recently provided design and construction engineering services for the City on the 70th Street improvement project. Mr. Rickart and Mr. Plowman will be assisted by an experienced staff of engineers and technicians. WSB welcomes this opportunity to continue to work with the City of Edina. WSB commits itself to deliver the City of Edina a quality of services that is consistent with your expectations and WSB's reputation. Please contact me at 763 - 287 -7183 if you have any questions regarding these proposals. Sincerely, WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. Charles T. Rickart, PE, PTOE PrincipaUProject Manager Attachments Tracy Avenue Improvements Benton Avenue to Vernon Avenue Engineering Services SCOPE OF WORK Task 1— Project Management This task includes planning and coordination of all work tasks, establishing and monitoring of budgets, communication with City Staff, and periodic meetings with staff on the project status. Phase 1 - Feasibility Study / Preliminary Design Task 2 - Public Involvement/Meetings We understand the importance and the City's methods of involving the public and will assist City staff with the preparation of meeting notices, questionnaires /surveys, and power point presentations, as well as assistance with conducting presentations for various public meetings as follows: Public informational meeting (2) Public Hearing (1) State Aid variance meeting (1) Task 3 - Preliminary Engineering Services Based on field evaluations, topographic survey, as -built data, and a geotechnical report, a preliminary design for the improvements will be developed in accordance with State Aid standards. Preliminary plans will be developed to a 30 percent completion level. The following will be completed as part of this task: • City data collection review • Final editing of City survey • Field evaluation of pavement, curb, and sidewalk conditions with City staff • Pavement evaluation and street improvement recommendations based on geotechnical evaluation • Field drainage evaluation • Preliminary roadway typical section • Preliminary roadway alignment, profile, and cross sections including realignment alternatives for Benton Avenue. • Identify sanitary sewer and watermain improvements /coordinate with City Staff. • Preliminary storm drainage design in accordance with State Aid and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District requirements. This will include evaluating a possible grit chamber prior to Hawkes Lake. • Evaluate on- street bicycle guidelines based on City of Edina's Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan and State Aid guidelines. • Evaluate pedestrian improvements related to sidewalk connections. Proposal — Tracy Avenue — Engineering Services Page 1 Benton Ave to Vernon Ave City Of Edina • Evaluate on- street parking needs. • Determine State Aid design criteria including assisting the City in securing advance funding. • Meetings with City staff to review preliminary design findings • Identify permitting requirements of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for storm water treatment and rate control. • Identify permitting requirements from Hennepin County for revisions to the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Vernon Avenue. • Gopher State One design locate. Obtain private utility maps and identify relocations /impacts based on discussions with private utility companies. • Prepare layout, Council resolution and memo for State Aid variance committee. • Preliminary project cost estimates Task 4 - Feasibility Study A feasibility report will be prepared based on the preliminary design of the proposed improvements. The report will include discussion of the existing and proposed conditions for the street and utility work along with the following items: • Project location maps and typical sections • Project photos • Preliminary cost estimates • Identify funding sources • Preliminary assessment roll and map based on City's current assessment policy • Project schedule • Summary of resident feedback from informational meeting and survey results Task 5 - Geotechnical Work Coordinate obtaining soil borings and pavement cores with outside geotechnical consultant hired by the City Field stake boring locations with elevations Review and comment on geotechnical report Phase 2 — Final Design Task 6 — Agency / Utility Coordination Up to eight (8) coordination meetings will held with impacted agencies, utilities and property owners along the corridor during final design. These will include, but are not limited to: • City Staff • Hennepin County • MnDOT • Nine Mile Creek Watershed District • Property Owners • Private Utilities Proposal — Tracy Avenue — Engineering Services Page 2 Benton Ave to Vernon Ave City Of Edina Task 7 — Right -of -Way Plan Based on the construction limits prepared during the Feasibility Report phase, a Right -of -Way Plan will be prepared identifying all necessary. right -of -way and easements suitable for submission to WDOT State Aid. Right -of- -Way parcel sketches and descriptions will be prepared and provided to the City. This task does not include cost for right-,of-way acquisition. Task 8 — Detail Design The final design plans and estimated costs will be prepared including all necessary components for submission to Mn/DOT State.Aid and Hennepin County for review and approval. The plans will be developed base on the design survey.conducted by the City and the preliminary design plans and recommendation from the approved Feasibility Study. Soil Boring information will be provide by the, City through a separate contract. The plans will be prepared based on required City, State, and Hennepin County design details and include at'a minimum the following sheets: 1. Title Sheet 2. General Layout 3. Demolition and Removals 4. Statement of Estimated Quantities 5. Soils and Construction Notes 6. Utility Tabulations 7. Quantity Tabulations 8. Typical Sections 9. Details 10. Traffic Control / Staging / Detour 11. Alignment Plans and Tabulations 12. Construction Plans and Profiles 13. Grading, Erosion Control and Turf Establishment Plans 14. Storm Sewer and Public Utility Plans 15. Signing and Striping Plans 16. Lighting Plans and Details 18. Cross Sections The final design plans will be prepared and provided to the City in ACAD format suitable for the City to prepare construction staking files and prepare as built drawings. WSB will work with City staff to ensure the files are compatible with the Cities CAD and file systems. Task 8 — Bid Package / Contract Documents WSB will prepare the final bid package for distribution to prospective bidders. This will include preparation of special provisions for items not included in the standard MnDOT specifications. In addition, it is assumed that the City of Edina will provide the boiler plate information including contract documents and standard City specifications in electronic format. WSB will support City Staff by providing information necessary for the advertisement of bids and distribution of bid packages. WSB will be available to address any questions including issuing any addendums if required through the bidding process. WSB will be in attendance at the bid opening and will verify the bids and will make a recommendation of award to the City. Proposal — Tracy Avenue — Engineering Services Benton Ave to Vernon Ave City Of Edina Page 3 ESTIMATED COST Tasks Cost Task 1 — Project Management $13,104 Phase 1— Feasibility Study / Prel Design $109,988 Task 2 - Public Involvement / $6,552 -Meetings Task 3 — Preliminary Engineering $15,272 Task 4 — Feasibility Study $8,076 Task 5 — Geotechnical Investigation $8,268 Total Phase 1 $30,728 Phase 2 — Final Design $109,988 Task 6 — Agency / Utility Coord. $8,728 Task 7 — Right of Way Plan $3,732 Task 8 — Detail Design $42,828 Task 9 — Bid Package / Contract Documents $10,868 Total Phase 2 $66,156 Total Labor Cost $109,988 (Mileage, Printing, etc. $500.00 =Expenses Total Project Cost $1109488 Proposal — Tracy Avenue — Engineering Services Page 4 Benton Ave to Vernon Ave City Of Edina SCHEDULE City Approves Proposal .......................:......... ............................... .......................November 1, 2011 Public Informational Meeting #1 ......................... ............................... Week of November 27, 2011 Public Informational Meeting #2 ......................... ............................... Week of December 19, 2011 Draft Feasibility Report to City for Review ............................. ............................... January 4, 2012 Council Accepts Feasibility Report/Approves Variance Request/Sets Public Hearing Date ............................ .... . ............................... January 17, 2012 Submit State Aid-Variance Request .................. ............................... .....................:January 20; 2012 Conduct Public Hearing/Authorize Preparation of Plans/ Specs ........................:... February 7,,2012 Survey / Base Mapping by City .................................... ............................... ..................:.:Completed Detail Design ...................................... ............................... ......................:.January / "February 2,012 Final Plans to State Aid ......................................................... ...........................:... February 17, 2012 MnDOT State Aid Review .................... ............................... ........................February % March 2012 City Council — Approves Final Plans and Authorize Ad for Bid ............................ March 20, 2012 Advertise for Bids ............................................................................. ............................... April 2012 OpenBids ................................................................................... ............................... April 27, 2012 City Council Award Contract ........................................................ ............................... May 1, 2012 Begin Construction ...................................................................... ............................... May 15, 2012 Construction Completion ................................... ............................... .......................November 2012 Proposal — Tracy Avenue — Engineering Services Page 5 Benton Ave to Vernon Ave City Of Edina i lI, RE PO RURECO M M E N DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. F. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -113 Certifying Special Assessment for Galleria Entrance Recommendation: Approve attached Resolution No. 2011 -113 certifying special assessment for Galleria entrance per attached agreement with Galleria Shopping Center. Info /Background: As part of the West 69th Street mill and overlay project this past June an entrance into the Galleria Shopping Center was enhanced. The Galleria Shopping Center agreed to waive their rights to a final assessment hearing for their cost of the work, see attached agreement. Per the agreement Galleria's cost is $27,226.01, with a term of 10 -years and an interest rate of 6.5 %. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2011 -113 Certifying Special Assessment for Galleria Entrance Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement g: \pw \central Svcs \eng div \projects \impr nos \ba350 westin entrance at 69Th st \admin \misc \Item Iv.f resolution no. 2011 -113 certifying special assessment for galleria entrance.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2011-113 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to the written Agreement of the Parties dated June 17, 2011, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Galleria Entrance BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of, land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2012. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Galleria Entrance Levy No. 18046 10 years 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 30 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 15. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 1St day of November, 2011 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 Resolution No. 2011 -113 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 1, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 20_• City Clerk PUBLIC''IIVIPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _/ 1 -114 day of .TV h e , ,20_ff-, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and GALLERIA SHOPPING CENTER, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of property identification numbers: 29- 028- 24 -33- 0022 legally described as Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1796 ( "Galleria Parcel" ), 29-028 - 24- 33- 0023 legally described as Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1796 ( "Gabberts Parcel "), and 29- 028 -24 -33 -0021 legally described,as Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1796 ( "Crate and Barrel Parcel "), City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (collectively the "Subject Property"). B. Property Owner has requested that the City install a new driveway onto West 69th Street on,the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") in conjunction with.City Project No. BA- 389. C. Property Owner has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The City will construct the driveway improvements, as generally illustrated on the attached Exhibit "A ", on the Subject Property as'part of City Project No. BA -389 (the "Public Improvement"). If the City has not awarded a contract for the Public Improvement by November 1, 2011, this Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement shall be null and void. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. If the City constructs the Public Improvement including the driveway improvements, the- City will assess- the cost of the driveway improvements, against the Subject Property apportioned among the three parcels as. follows: Galleria Parcel $20,076.45, Gabberts Parcel $4,100:24, Crate and Barrel Parcel $3,049.32. The assessments shall be spread over ten (10) years, together with six and one half percent (6.5 %) interest per year on the unpaid balance. Interest shall accrue from the date of the adoption of the special assessment roll. The first installment shall be due and payable with taxes in 2012. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the Public Improvement and special assessments, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. §- 429.081. If the special assessments are not timely paid.or are set aside for 157890vO2 RNK:06 /01/2011 any reason, then, instead of paying the special assessments, the Property Owner shall pay the City on demand an amount equivalent to the unpaid special assessments together with any legal fees the City may incur. 3. REMOVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS. The. driveway improvements being constructed pursuant to this Agreement, as illustrated on Exhibit "A ", include the construction of a new right out movement onto West 69"' Street. The City may without compensation to the Property Owner eliminate the right out movement onto West 691' Street if the City in its sole discretion determines it is appropriate to do so because of improvement to West 69h Street or redevelopment. 4. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. 15789002 2 RNK:06 /01/2011 M (SEAL) AND Scott H. 14eal, City Manage STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 7, u-4AI� , 20-LL by James,B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 15789Ov02 RNK:06 /01/2011 3 -- ------------ DE13RA MMGEN MYCa mfti oE*=Jan.91, 2015 0401011% RRAA-Non PROPERTY OWNER: GALLERIA SHOPPING CENTER, LLC BY: Its Pi►'- AND Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF _ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged efore me this �t day of JVIn e , 2011 , by O-)ac fk,n L• e k and by the Peres i and of Galleria Shopping Center, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 15789002 RNK:06 /01/2011 NOTARY PUBLIC ■ • TINA MARIE RYSKEWECZ NOTARY PURM -1WIN WA wV Cow"a hajW 3t, 80 im • 4 w EXMIT "A" TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT 157890vO2 5 RNK:06 /01/2011 xv [_w� �f Y' .l M! E i , t .. r r � og�q.l I EXHIBIT "A" TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT �:7i �Si7 I o _I7 - + 1 �s :.cs : r:.:W v 4 CPROPOSED RIGHT OVEMENT .. ol +I cp •tm� , -I � o ; i.ti, Z7�A�p 0 ,•a I Ki � , tir -r , � I o a X71 •a ., , io -F - To, :7) ms yt'-1 I 10 1 7 if 1 7 a f 7 f + e 3 + 3 1 1 7 f 3_� f 1� I+ !-,; mom 2 • of I a O • • a • I O y ■� �� 4I 3AY riiDA r . 15789002 5 RNK:06 /01/2011 a 1 I I a • $, °. \' a 'k O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. G. From: John Keprios, Directo ® Action Park and Recreation De artment Discussion Date: November 1, 2011 Information Subject: Edina Community Foundation Designated Fund Agreement ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Edina Community Foundation Designated Fund Agreement that waives the Foundation's office rent for one fiscal year in exchange for the Foundation's expense in processing the $400,000 in contributions that the Veterans Memorial Committee intends to fundraise. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: As shown in Attachment "A," the agreement proposes that "the City shall waive its office rent ordinarily paid to the City for the Foundation's 2011 -2012 fiscal year from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012." The Foundation's rental fee would be waived in consideration for the Foundation's expense in processing as much as $400,000 to be fundraised by the Edina Veterans Memorial Committee. The total dollar value to waive the rental fee for one fiscal year is $1,800. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" — Edina Community Foundation Designated Fund Agreement ATTACHMENT "A" EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Designated Fund Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is between the Edina Community Foundation (the Foundation), a Minnesota nonprofit corporation located at 5280 Grandview Square, Edina, MN 55436 that is a tax- exempt public charity under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; the Edina Veterans Memorial Fund Committee, c/o the City of Edina, Edina, MN 55424 (the Committee), an unincorporated association committed to honoring all Edina veterans and especially Edina residents who died while in service of their country; and the Edina Park & Recreation Department, located at City Hall, 4801 West 50'h Street, Edina, MN 55424 (the Department), which has administrative responsibility for Edina's public parks. 1. The Foundation shall establish a Designated Fund (the Fund), to be named the Edina Veterans Memorial Fund, to hold contributions to the Foundation that are made from time to time for support of the Committee's memorial program. 2. The Fund shall be used, subject to Foundation Board approval of requests from the Committee or its authorized representative, only to make grants, consistent with the mission of the Foundation to Strengthen Our Community, to the Department for the creation or construction of a suitable memorial in an Edina park to honor all Edina veterans and especially Edina residents who died while in service of their country. Those who died will be recognized by a permanent plaque as part of the memorial. The Department shall be responsible for securing the necessary approval by the Edina City Council in advance of the grant. Contributions from significant donors and the assistance from the Foundation shall be appropriately recognized by a permanent display in the Memorial in such matter as determined by the Committee. 3. The Fund shall be subject to the requirements imposed upon funds of the Foundation under the terms and provisions of the Foundation's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, as amended. If any restriction, condition, limitation or trust is imposed with respect to any funds or property, the title to which has become vested in the Foundation, and if, in the sole judgment of the Foundation's Board of Directors, such restriction, condition, limitation or trust becomes unnecessary, incapable of fulfillment or inconsistent with the Foundation's charitable and educational mission, the Board shall have the power to modify or eliminate any restriction, condition, limitation or trust, acting within the limits of its authority as an organization exempt from income taxes under Federal and State law. 4. Any earnings on the Fund shall accrue to the benefit of the Foundation's general unrestricted funds in accordance with the established policy of the Foundation. In consideration for the Foundation's expense in processing as much as $400,000 in contributions, the City shall waive its office rent ordinarily paid to the City for the Foundation's 2011 -2012 fiscal year, from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012. 5. The Committee agrees to execute and deliver to the Foundation any further information and/or documents that may be reasonably required by the Foundation to further the intent of this Agreement and/or the Foundation's mission. This Agreement is effective when signed by the parties, as of , 2011. EDINA VETERANS MEMORIAL CITY OF EDINA FUND COMMITTEE Michael Goergen, Chair EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION By: Dick Crockett, Executive Director Af Scott Neal, City Manager 'e •j o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV -H From: Steve A. Kirchman Chief Building Official ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Covenant Regarding Maintenance of Yard for 7100 Ohms Lane ACTION REQUESTED: Approve covenant agreeing to leave that part of Outlot A indicated on Exhibit A open for as long as the current building on 7100 Ohms Lane is required to be an unlimited area building. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The building owner wishes to establish an assembly occupancy within the existing office /warehouse building. The assembly occupancy will be batting cages. It has been confirmed the batting cages are a permitted use in that area. Because the assembly occupancy is large in relation to other occupancies in the building, the batting cages are not permitted by the building code unless conditions in the building and /or the property are modified. The building code contains a provision wherein a fully sprinklered building, surrounded by 60' open yards, is permitted to be of unlimited area. Use of the unlimited area provision allows the assembly occupancy to be used in this building without regard to its area in relation to the other occupancies in the building. Because the building is already fully sprinklered and 60' open yards exist 94% of its perimeter, this provision appears to be the most practical, cost - effective means of permitting the assembly occupancy. The attached covenant does not grant the adjacent property owner any rights to use the City property. The covenant (Exhibit A) only prevents the City from constructing a structure on that part of the property required to be maintained as open yard. Other use of the property such as a road or park is not restricted. ATTACHMENTS: Request for "yard easement" Covenant Regarding Maintenance of Yards for an Unlimited Area Building (Exhibit A) Parcel map with building footprints Aerial photograph H:\ Documents\ Memos &Rpts\ Council \71000hmsLa\SttRpt11011 Ldocx 7100 Ohms Lane, Edina, Minnesota 55439 The City of Edina: I am requesting a yard easement on the property located at 7100 Ohms Lane, (Lot 13, Block 1 Edina Interchange Center Third Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota). The property that is owned by the City of Edina is 60 feet wide and 300 feet long. Approximately 18,164 square feet, .42 Acres. The lot known as parcel # 09- 116 -21 -22 -0035. This easement would change the classification of the building giving me 60 feet from all four corners of my building. Now I have 60 feet on 3 corners, and 46.18 feet on one corner. The property in question is owned by the City of Edina. This is a low wet land, and is an over flow area for Nine Mile Creek water shed. And now acts as a water holding pond. This would not be a buildable lot, unless the wet land would be filled in. Also an electrical easement is on the property line. Thank you for your consideration, Na6WO44�� I Mark Waterston 7100 Ohms Lane Edina, MN 55439 0 C T 17 2G'ii COVENANT REGARDING MAINTENANCE OF YARDS FOR AN UNLIMITED AREA BUILDING. COVENANT made this day of 2011, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and EDINA OHMS LANE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Ohms"). RECITALS A. Section 507 of the Minnesota State Building Code, ,Unlimited Area Buildings, provides, that "building shall not be limited when the building is surrounded and adjoined by public ways or yards not less than 60 feet" ( "Required Yard'). Section 202 of the Minnesota State Building Code defines a "Yard" as "an open space, other than a court, unobstructed from the ground to the sky." B. Ohms has applied for a building permit that requires a 60 foot surrounding Yard. C. The Required Yard must be established on Lot' .13, Block 1, Edina Interchange' Center 3rd Addition owned by Ohms ( "Ohms Property ") where the building requiring a Required Open Yard is located and on Outlot A, Edina Interchange 8th Addition owned by the City ( "City Property "). NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The sixty foot,Required Yard shall be maintained on the Ohms Property and on the City Property, surrounding the building on the Ohms Property, in accordance with the attached Exhibit "A". as long as a building exists on the Ohm's property that requires the Required Yard. 2. This Covenant shall be recorded against the title to the .Ohms Property and the City Property, shall run with the land and shall be binding. upon the parties, their successors and assigns. CITY OF EDINA EDINA OHMS LANE, LLC BY: ........ BY: James Hovland, Mayor Its AND Scott Neal, City Manager 16022501 1 RNK:10 /10/2011 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2011, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 2011, by the Edina Ohms Lane, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on company. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone : 651 - 452 -5000 RNK:srn 16022501 2 RNK:10 /10/2011 day of of behalf of the N p C O N O Lot: 013, Block: 001 Edina Interchange Center 3rd Addn 35' 60' Addition #: 75192 PI D: 09-116-21-22-002 4 60' open yard required for unlimited area w 45' [. building 60' T30V' 90' Required open y rd on City property Lot: 000, Block: 000 Edina Interchange 8th Addn Addition #: 01209 PI D: 09- 116 -21 -22 -0035 Metes /Bounds: OUTLOT A No Address Assigned City of Edina 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 IV n3t-(M%'0-'"9 I7100 Ohms La City of Edina Proposed Open Yard 1 inch = 40 feet w E n /7114 CAI! M x 2 ilg LOGISMap Version 1.1 - Windows Internet Explorer General Tools: Q x_5217 52iJ' r-- _ �% 1151535 9 511VS, 5209 5205 SidB 5181 As ? 43180 3145 TIF7om 5117 24 1 3201 / �� 5176 5141 5125 5121 5193A. \. 5172 3137 5129- 5124 b168 5133 3132 5128 1 '�[ 51651 5164 �( 3181 • QP -5160 24 5177 3136 51445136 5400 ,4 24 �N! 5173 5132 3148 >r 5129 Open Specs 2 �.(,�169 51� 33145312. 5300 r� '`,5165 1615157 5143 1 135, 502430 531 3232 r_ 5149 SJ04 5228 S104 3032 52?4�5220 5216 5208 5112 51i� 5212 + i 24 .'OT)I S7 ' 7100 i 7101 i sv0 4 W T 1 24 711771e <7f25 ,� 71i 7200 �`1✓ 7171. J .l 7250 u,paa.mw..,kws Identify Parcel Info L 7220 525U 52" 73RD ST W iA, �7 ?01 .7211 7261 T 7121 ^ 7251 7231 L% _ 7. U 7241 ie 7. 24 6! 24 Mall Labe1T Wl* I LaY— ( Lepsnd I Haling asps taw ( i+rr.t ( -ip E.-Property Information L Owner Information Zoning / land Use Information Assessina Information Sales Information L_ Multi- Address Information :+ Permit Information J& Return to Top fl_Unk to the County Website b Pictometry on MicroSoft Bina PID: 0911621220024 County Address: 7100 OHMS LA City Address: 7100 Ohms La 7J p: 55439 School Dist: 0273 Owner Change: 6/15/2011 Parent PID: Lot: 013 Block: 001 Addition #: 75192 Display PID: 09- 116 -21 -22 -0024 Subdivision: Edina Interchange Center Third Addition Metes /Bounds: • The "City Address' is maintained by the city assessing department. The "County Address" is derived from the selected parcel map feature. LOGISMap Version 1.1 - Windows Internet Explorer General Tools: Q Q i a 011 © a 39 711 �3 r 5221 �• 5220 A ` T 100 i sy. # L�LIA*{ta r i.. I z Volt r —1 r r t ' Mail Label Tools: I�S_ %o �zz -1� search :-•".— bras t Legend Maiq llnavewv t Print tM,b Ei PID: 0911621220024 © County Address: 7100 OHMS LA City Address: 7100 Ohms La Zip: 55439 School Dist: 0273 Owner Change: 6/15/2011 = Parent PID: 0 Lot: 013 ri Block: 001 0 Addition #: 75192 Display PID: 09- 116 -21 -22 -0024 Subdivision: Edina Interchange Center Third Addition Metes /Bounds: ' The "City Address" is maintained by the city assessing department. The "County Address" is derived from the selected parcel map feature. a 13 Owner is Edina Ohms La, LLC Attn Mark Waterston 7100 Ohms La Edina, MN S5439 &ping /Land Use Infot_mation Return tqj Zoning: PID Acres : 3.79 Area [SgFtj 165046 d Geometric Acres : 3.82465965217 Geometric Area [Scl : 166602.174448723 Effective Width: 349 1 716 F, r ti a \I�<-' >ea.fwnhdl5 re ;Cllf7CiS CIS XAIS Zoom Volt r —1 r r t ' Mail Label Tools: I�S_ %o �zz -1� search :-•".— bras t Legend Maiq llnavewv t Print tM,b Ei PID: 0911621220024 © County Address: 7100 OHMS LA City Address: 7100 Ohms La Zip: 55439 School Dist: 0273 Owner Change: 6/15/2011 = Parent PID: 0 Lot: 013 ri Block: 001 0 Addition #: 75192 Display PID: 09- 116 -21 -22 -0024 Subdivision: Edina Interchange Center Third Addition Metes /Bounds: ' The "City Address" is maintained by the city assessing department. The "County Address" is derived from the selected parcel map feature. a 13 Owner is Edina Ohms La, LLC Attn Mark Waterston 7100 Ohms La Edina, MN S5439 &ping /Land Use Infot_mation Return tqj Zoning: PID Acres : 3.79 Area [SgFtj 165046 d Geometric Acres : 3.82465965217 Geometric Area [Scl : 166602.174448723 Effective Width: 349 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.I. From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer ® Action Discussion Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Traffic Safety Report of October 5, 2011 ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the revised Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 5, 2011. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: The Traffic Safety Committee Report was removed from the Transportation Commission's consent agenda for further discussion. Items of interest to the Transportation Commission and a brief overview of the discussion can be found in the attached draft meeting minutes from October 20, 2011. The Edina Transportation Commission did approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report without making any changes. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Staff Review Report for October 5, 2011 Draft Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of October 20, 2011 \ \ED- NT8 \EngPubWks\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \Staff Review Summa6es \1 l TSAC & MIn \Item IV.1.2011101TSC.doc \r EMORWAMPI-OC REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation. Commission Agenda Item Item.Nb: IV.B From: Byron Theis. Traffic Safety Coordinator F Action Discussion Information Date: October 20, 2011 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 5th, 2011. ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday October 5th, 2011. BACKGROUND: It is not anticipated that residents will,,be in attendance at the meeting. regarding any of the attached issues. An overview of, the comments supplied by the Transportation Commission will be included in the staff report provided to Council at their November 1St, 2011 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Review for October 5th, 2011. \\ED- NT8\EngPubWks\ Engineering \lnfrastructure\Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee\Staff Review Summaries \1 l TSAC & Min \10 -05- 1 Ldoc TRAFFIC SAFETY CONMTTEE REPORT Wednesday, October 5th, 2011 The Committee review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 5I', 2011. The Committee is comprised of staff members included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Police Traffic Supervisor and Traffic Safety Coordinator. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the October 20, 2011, Edina Transportation Commission and then on to the November 1, 2011 Council Agenda. SF.CTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval of request: 1. Request for a Yield sign at the intersection of Brook Drive and Limerick Lane. The resident recently had an accident at this intersection which prompted the request. He states that because this is an uncontrolled intersection, drivers do not know who has the right -of -way. After a discussion with staff, the resident requested that Yield signs be placed at the intersection of Brook Drive and Limerick Lane. The City policy states that Yield signs may be warranted, "at the entrance to an intersection where it is necessary to establish right of way and where safe approach speed exceeds 10 MPH based on adequate sight distance ". Also the legs of the intersection cannot exceed 800 vehicles per hour for any hour. Limerick Lane is a City street with a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 363 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 29.9 mph south of Brook Drive; with a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 294 vehicles with an 85Th percentile speed of 25.1 mph north of Brook Drive. Brook Drive is a City street with a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 133 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 22.1 mph east of Limerick Lane; with a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 87 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 26 mph west of Limerick Lane. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 1 of 5 October 5th, 2011 Both streets meet the requirement for traffic volumes and they both meet the requirements to have Yield signs placed on them. Brook Drive should be selected for the Yield signs due to the lower traffic volumes on it. Staff recommends the approval of the installation of "Yield" signs on each leg of Brook .Drive at the intersection of Limerick Lane. 2. Request for crosswalk at the intersections of Edinborough Way and West 76th Street and,for Edinborough Way and.Parklawn Avenue. This request comes from a resident who lives at 7500 York Avenue. They are concerned about the visibility of the crosswalks at these intersections. The residents at 7500 York are elderly and have a hard time seeing the crosswalks was the argument made by the requestor. The policy for crosswalks states that crosswalks shall be placed at intersections that have an excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for two hours for any eight hour period. Pedestrian crossing studies were conducted at the intersections of Parklawn Avenue and Edinborough Way and Edinborough Way and West 76th Street. These counts were conducted by observing the intersections and making note of the pedestrians who cross the intersections. The intersection of Parklawn Avenue and Edinborough Way had 21 pedestrians crossing the intersection in two hours. The intersection of West 76`h Street' and Edinborough Way had 29 pedestrians crossing the intersection in two hours. Both of these intersections meet warrants for painted crosswalks. Staff recommends the approval of marking the crosswalks at the Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 2 of 5 October 5th, 2011 SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request: Request for stop signs at the intersection of Glengarry Parkway and Northwood Drive. This request comes from a resident on Glengarry Parkway who is concerned about the speed of the traffic that travels through that intersection. The resident stated that the traffic does not slow down and feels that a stop sign would slow the speed. Glengarry Parkway is a City street with a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 194 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 28.4 mph. Northwood Drive is also a C1 street with a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 186 vehicles with an 85 - percentile speed of 22 mph. Stop sign policy states that the total vehicular volume on the intersecting streets must be at least 1000 vehicles per day. This intersection does not meet the warrants for a stop sign on either leg of the intersection. Staff recommends the denial of the request for a stop sign at the intersection of Glengarry Parkway and Northwood Drive due to lack of warrants. 2. Request for an all -way stop sign at the intersection of Drew Avenue and Fuller Street. This request comes from a resident in Beard Court who drives by this intersection frequently. The concern is focused on the school playground which is located on the northwest corner of that intersection. This request was received in May. It was decided that the traffic studies would be conducted during the school year in the fall. Traffic studies were conducted for the intersection. This involved placing traffic counters on each of the four legs of the intersection. Drew Avenue had a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 117 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 23.3 mph south of Fuller Street; and had a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 268 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 22.6 mph north of Fuller Street. Fuller Street had a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 280 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 21.4 mph west of Drew Avenue; and had a Mon -Fri. average daily traffic of 194 vehicles with an 85th_ percentile speed of 24.5 mph east of Drew Avenue. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 3 of 5 October 5th, 2011 J The policy for an all -way stop sign, to be placed at an intersection requires there to be and average of 300 vehicles. per hour entering the intersection for any eight hours. The intersection of Drew Avenue and Fuller Street do not meet the warrants for an all -way stop sign. This intersection also does not meet the warrants for a stop 'sign on one of the legs.' The policy for a stop sign on one of the legs requires there to be a total vehicular volume of 1000 vehicles at the intersection. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request for the traffic volume to be investigated along Benton Avenue from Hansen Road to Valley View Road. Requestor would like there to be a bike lane and a sidewalk installed. Requestor was advised about the bike route in our comprehensive plan. Further study of traffic and pedestrian volumes will also be conducted. 2. Request for crosswalks and for pedestrian safety on Sunnyside Road near Curve Avenue. The resident has concerns with the traffic around the time the children are waiting for the bus. The bus stops along the south side of Sunnyside Road, with a majority of the children standing on the north side. Resident was referred to David White, the Edina School Bus Supervisor of Transportation 3. Request for replacement of a sign for eastbound on Sherwood Avenue that read, "No Left Turn" at the bus entrance. Referred to Public Works sign shop for replacement. 4. Request for stop lines to be placed at the intersections of Monterey Avenue and West 42nd Street and for Oakdale Avenue and West 42nd Street. Further study about the appropriate use of stop lines is being considered by staff. 5. Request for "No Parking" signs on West 42nd Street across from Golden Years Montessori School. This request was initially made in March of this year. This was approved by the Council on May 17th. After complaints by residents affected by signs, it was determined that more investigation was required. A letter was sent out to residents to determine the opinions regarding the signs. The results of the letter were two Traffic Safety Committee Report October 5th, 2011 Page 4 of 5 residents are opposed to the signs, and four residents who did not contact to submit vote. Investigations of the area during the time parents' drop -off and pick up their children was also conducted and included in this meeting. Further study about the traffic conditions is required. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. 1. Call from a resident who wanted information about the number of crashes at the intersection of West 65h Street and France Avenue. Resident was given data from 2001 to 2010 showing 77 crashes at this intersection. 2. Call from a resident who wanted no parking for an event at their house. Referred to Police Department, who authorizes temporary no parking. 3. Call from resident inquiring about the temporary speed table on Sunnyside Avenue. Staff informed resident that the ETC will be creating a policy for future use of temporary speed tables in Edina. 4. Six traffic counts were conducted in residential neighborhoods that are scheduled to be reconstructed in 2012. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 5 of 5 October 5th, 2011 f� I� MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CO_ MMUNITY ROOM October 20, 2011 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bass, Braden, Nelson, Schold Davis, Thompson, Janovy, McKlveen, Housh, Bonneville, Franzen, Schweiger APPROVAL OF 'MEETING AGENDA Chair Janovy proposed moving n raffic Safety to after item D and add Transportation Option Working Group Update just before.BETF,Jte otion- was made by member McKlveen and Motion carried. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS COMMUNITY COMMENT Bob Boettcher, 5250 Grandview Square, representing. ff� , 'rance Avenue, requested that the ETC considers sev. ie week is important to the chu�fhleffild ikes lanes IMO. f rr f rr variance from the City for onst et par NO aske Vy.. r. finding solutions that will accommodate bikes cars and 14IM11.- ."y �a to na,'Co munity Lut an Church at 54 Street, one block off of '`rfrr�ff- f park ingbtions on'S. Street because on- street parking during fff�,�r,.�ff //, bothfsi'-s would restrict parking. He said church has a ,r�ff�!f3f ;tljattl�Js be kept }ijl�mind and that consideration be given to Karen Kurt, assistant'city manage, said oriefrof >her charge`�is(working with boards and commissions to ensure they have all the tools needed and one project�t at isfcurre�tly underway is developing a bylaw template. She said commission �ffr�' staff liaisons are wo..'k ..'king with her on a l oft andgLdpresentatives from each commission will be invited to review and comment on it. Add tiQn�lly, she said a bards and;,commissions survey will probably be done in November to get feedback in several areas;�ncluding training�that will be scheduled for next year. M Parklawn Road /Londonderry Intersection Realienment Mr. Sullivan explained that one year ago, a request came in for an all -way stop sign at Parklawn Road and Londonderry Road. Currently, there is a stop sign. Traffic counts were collected and speed is reasonable and volumes are low. The request was denied and requestor presented additional information to Council and Council asked staff to look at the intersection again. Staff suggested that the requestor used the NTMP process but the requestor did not want to. Mr. Sullivan said staff is proposing to tighten up the intersection by, bringing the north leg of Londonderry Road in �rpendicular to Parkwood Road. The intersection will still be controlled by a stop sign for vehicles traveling south on _andonderry Road. Vehicles traveling on Parkwood Road and the south leg of Londonderry Road will have the right -of- way thru the intersection. The work would be done this fall. 1 Motion was made by member Thompson and seconded by member McKlveen approving the proposed design. All voted ave. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Report of October S. 2011 Section B. I. — Mr. Sullivan explained that requestor was looking to define who had the right -of -way and it was more related to users of the park who are not familiar with the area. Section D — Commission requested traffic counts data. Section C. I. — Chair Janovy said BETF is prioritizing routes that they Avenue is one of them. Mr. Sullivan said they are doing traffic cour informed of the bicycle primary and secondary routes, as well as they$' October S. 2011. All voted ave. Motion carried. Transportation Options Working Group Chair Janovy said BETF is prio them. STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. they Ifke to see striped and signed and Benton ntly on this street and the requestor was plans. nd signed and Benton Avenue is one of 01 OCR REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VII. A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -112 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2011 -112 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-112 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Kay Peltier Glass Art Dated: November 1, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 1, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952- 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 0379 'e ERE 11%1_ s i REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII.B. From: Karen Kurt Assistant City Manager ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Neighborhood Identification Public Engagement Process ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Approve a two tier public engagement process for the purpose of determining neighborhood boundaries and names, and 2. Determine the selection process for the neighborhood identification oversight group INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Objective To educate residents on neighborhood associations and to build broad community support for city -wide neighborhood boundaries and individual neighborhood names. Two Tier Engagement Process Council members previously expressed their preference to include many stakeholders in the neighborhood identification process. To meet this goal, while at the same time using citizen input efficiently and effectively, we are proposing a two tier public engagement process. Oversight Group: The oversight group would design an engagement process to educate residents on the potential of neighborhood associations, identify key stakeholders and gather input into neighborhood boundaries and names. This group of 8 -10 individuals would be selected based on the following desired qualifications: • Interest in designing and facilitating public engagement processes • Strong community knowledge • Exposure to local government civic processes The individuals in this group would be advocates of the city -wide objective rather than advocates of a particular area or association. This group would be temporary and disbanded after a recommendation to the City Council is made. Citizen Input Teams Since the topic for forming neighborhoods boundaries is likely to raise the interest of individuals who currently belong to an association or who are interested in forming an association, it will be important for the engagement process to capture these voices as well as the input of other stakeholders in the community. It would be the responsibility of the oversight group to use citizen teams and other engagement tools to gather input and build consensus regarding boundaries and names of neighborhoods within a geographic area. The citizen teams would be open to all interested residents. The two tier engagement process would enable the City to maximize input into the process while using a reasonably sized -group to steer the engagement process and final work product. One potential option for outreach and consensus building within the community using a two tier process is outlined in the attached "Quadrant Engagement Model "; however, it is likely that the neighborhood identification oversight group will have their own ideas about how to best mobilize the citizen teams and other engagement methods. Selection of Neighborhood Identification Oversight Grou The neighborhood identification oversight group could be selected several ways: 1. The City Council jointly interviews and selects a Task Force in conjunction with the board and commission interview process in January. 2. Each City Council - member appoints two members to a Task Force. 3. A City staff team interviews and selects an Advisory Group that is confirmed by the City Council. 4. A Super Committee is formed from volunteers from current board and commission members. 5. Combination of 1 -4 City staff recommends a council- appointed task force (option 1 or 2) comprised of volunteers solicited from the current Board and Commissions along with selected citizens. A final option would be for City staff to oversee the process and implement the attached Quadrant Model, which involves organizing citizen teams by geographical quadrants. Based on the input of the citizen teams, City staff would make a final recommendation for neighborhood boundaries and names. ATTACHMENTS: Overview of Quadrant Engagement Model OVERVIEW OF QUADRANT ENGAGEMENT MODEL: One potential option for outreach and consensus building within the.community with regard to neighborhood identification is represented by the "Quadrant Model ". Under this model, the neighborhood identification oversight group would engage broader citizen teams organized by quadrants. Using Highways 62 and 100 as.boundaries, the City has Northeast, Northwest, Southeast and Southwest quadrants. The quadrant citizen teams would be open to any interested individuals in the geographic area. The citizen teams would have the opportunity to learn about neighborhoodassociations and the development . history of their.area. The teams would be asked to catalogue current neighborhood groups and institutions. With the assistance of the oversight group, the citizen teams would work towards a consensus regarding neighborhood boundaries and names for their quadrant. By using these smaller geographic areas, citizens would have the opportunity to concentrate on those areas closest to them. This localized synergy may lead to connections that facilitate the development of neighborhood associations in the area. A graphic overview of the quadrant model is outlined below; the roles and responsibilities of the oversight group and quadrant teams are described in the tables that follow the graphic. Neighborhood Identification Oversight Group NE Quadrant NW Quadrant Team M Team SE Quadrant Team Recommends Recommends Recommends Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Boundaries Boundaries Boundaries and Names for and Names for and Names for Quadrant Quadrant Quadrant Neighborhood Identification Oversight Group SW Quadrant Team Recommends Neighborhood Boundaries and Names for Quadrant ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR QUADRANT MODEL: • Interest in designing and facilitating public • engagement processes • Strong community knowledge • Exposure to local government civic processes Create a process that can be replicated in each quadrant of the City that achieves the following: o Educate residents and stakeholders on the value of forming neighborhood associations. • Identify current organizations that may function similar to a neighborhood association or serve as community resource. • Promote participation in the Quadrant Teams or other citizen engagement forums created by the group. • Design engagement tools that can be used to gather citizen input identifying neighborhood boundaries and names. • Facilitate the Quadrant Teams to achieve consensus around neighborhood boundaries and names for the Quadrant. Make recommendation to the City Council regarding neighborhood boundaries and names for the entire community. open to all residents or stakeholders in the • Catalogue current area institutions that may Quadrant function similar to a neighborhood association or that serve as a community resource. • Build connections between residents and interest in the potential for neighborhood associations. • Provide input and achieve consensus regarding boundaries and names of neighborhoods within the quadrant Allin LIU \�RPOF>'T 1868 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VII. C. From: Scott Neal City Manager ❑ ❑ Action Discussion Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Approve Grant Application to Hennepin County for "Open to Business" Program ACTION REQUESTED: Move to approve a grant application to Hennepin County for the "Open to Business" program. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: As part of a broader strategy to promote economic development, create and retain jobs, and cultivate entrepreneurs, the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( HCHRA) is soliciting proposals from suburban Hennepin municipalities interested in launching or expanding a small business and entrepreneur technical assistance initiative called "Open to Business." The "Open to Business" program was originally conceived as a partnership between the City of Brooklyn Park and the nonprofit community development organization Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers (MCCD) (www.mccdmn.org). Through this partnership, MCCD provides direct, one -on -one technical assistance services to Brooklyn Park's entrepreneurs and small businesses. The range of services includes: Business plan development Feasibility studies Cash flow and financing projections Marketing Loan request preparation Advocacy with lending institutions Since its success in Brooklyn Park, the "Open to Business" model has expanded to the cities of Minnetonka and St. Louis Park. Because of the success of "Open to Business ", the HCHRA has committed funds to support the efforts of suburban Hennepin municipalities interested in pursuing this initiative. MCCD provides "Open to Business" services to participating municipalities' entrepreneurs and small businesses for a flat annual fee. The base annual fee is $10,000 for municipalities with populations between 30,000 and 60,000. Municipalities also may partner with other cities and share the annual cost if their population is less than 30,000. For populations over 60,000, fees will be negotiated on a case -by- case basis. The HCHRA has $75,000 available for one -to -one matching grants up to $5,000 for municipalities or collaborations of municipalities who wish to provide an annual pilot of "Open to Business" in their community. Funds are available on a one -time basis. I have submitted a grant application [see attached] to HCHRA on behalf of the City. The City's $5,000 funding for this program would come from our HRA Fund. The HCHRA requires a Council action approving the grant application. If the Council approves the requested motion, HCHRA will act on the grant application. If the Council does not approve the requested motion, the grant application will be withdrawn. I recommend Council approval of this motion. City of Edina v DATE: October 14, 2011 TO: Patricia Fitzgerald, Principal Planning Analyst Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works & Transit FROM: Scott H. Neal, City Manager RE: Application for "Open to Business" Matching Funds Applicants: City of Edina, 4801.W..50th.Street, Edina, MN 55424 Primary . Contact Person: Scott H. Neal, City Manager sneal @ci.edina.mn.us Amount of HCHRA Funds Requested: $5,000 Population size of participating municipality: 48,000 Annual Fee for "Open to Business per above fee schedule: unknown Source of funds for local match: City's 2012 and 2013 Housing & Redevelopment Authority annual operating budgets Proposed timeframe for "Open to Business ". Start date: January 1, 2012 End date: December 31, 2013 \ 1. Explain the need for entrepreneur development and small business technical assistance services in your community and the locations in your community that would most likely receive this development assistance. Edina is home to, a large and varied entrepreneurial community, including a number of retired small business owners who may have a continued interest in creating jobs and wealth for our region. Our grant would be used to seek them out and to help respond to their needs. The group of small businesses in the City's Pentagon Park area and the Cahill Industrial Area are both locations in the city where development assistance from the City and the County would be helpful. 2. How would your community promote the "Open to Business" initiative to your entrepreneurs and small businesses? The City has a number of communications tools (website, newsletter, cable television, etc.) that it can use to promote the initiative. The City would also partner with the Chamber of Commerce to promote program is small and large grout settings. 3. How does the "Open to Business" strategy complement other economic development initiatives in your community, or would this be a new venture for your community? If this is a new venture, explain how the initiative fits your community's goals and plans. The "Open to Business" program would be a new initiative for our community. The City of Edina has been active in the past with the development of the community. However, the City does not have much of a history of direct interaction with business development initiatives. The City Council has charged me with improving the City's relationship with the business community and to help build the strength of the local small business sector. The "Open to Business" initiative fits that goal perfectly. 4. Which staff would oversee the "Open to Business" strategy and how would the outcomes and experiences of this initiative be tracked and measured? The City Council has given me tentative approval to create a new Economic Development Director position. Funding for the position is included in the City's 2012 -2013 Housing and Redevelopment Authority operating budgets. The new Economic Development Director will oversee this program, including establishing performance metrics to track its effectiveness. 6kne REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII. A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Receive Petition Against Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project Recommendation: Motion receiving the petition and letter as presented. Info /Background: Mike Slaughter submitted the attached petition on behalf of the property owners of Valley Estates. Mr. Slaughter also submitted a letter detailing the neighborhoods position. October 19, 2011 The Honorable James B. Hovland wv SEgL. ti Mayor, City of Edina OCT z 4801 W. 50`h St. 0 2011 Edina, MN 55424 R JHovlandnn.ci.edina.mn.us Y YU Re: Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project, City of Edina Petition Against Street Reconstruction Dear Mayor Hovland: We, owners of property impacted by the Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project ( "Project "), are opposed to the Project for the following reasons: 1. The streets are currently in satisfactory condition. 2. The streets appear to have the structural integrity to provide many more years of useful life based on an opinion of a Licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. The utilities have more than 34 years of useful life remaining based on statements from Jack Sullivan, City Engineer. 4. The project is not the best use of limited resources (see page 1 of the Capital Improvement Program). 5. Detailed documentation of need has not been provided. We Petition the City of Edina to halt and defer the Project (Petition with original signatures is attached). The petition does not state the reasons why we are opposed to the Project nor clearly state what we want the City to do so we signed a letter ( "Letter ") that states the reasons and what we want the City to do. The Letter with original signatures is attached. Our summary: 1. Opposed 49 2. Neutral 3 3. In favor (want streets fixed) 5 4. Subtotal (number of responses) 57 5. No response 23 6. Total number of houses 80 The percent opposed is 86% based on the number of responses and 61.2% based on the total number of houses. We look forward to your response. Best Regards, Mike Slaughter 6625 Nordic Drive September 12, 2011 The Honorable James B. Hovland Mayor, City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 ry JHovland( ,ci.edina.nm.us Re: Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project City of Edina Dear Mayor Hovland: We, owners of property impacted by the Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project ( "Project "), are opposed to the Project for the following reasons: 1. The streets are currently in satisfactory condition. 2. The streets appear to have the structural integrity to provide many more years of useful life based on an opinion of a Licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. The utilities have more than 34 years of useful life remaining based on statements from Jack Sullivan, City Engineer. 4. The project is not the best use of limited resources (see page 1 of the Capital Improvement Program). 5. Detailed documentation of need has not been provided. We Petition the City of Edina to halt and defer the Project. CADocuments and Settings\Mike Slaughter \Local SettingsUemporary Intemet Files \Content.lE5 \P2X.1G2LK\ Letter° /o20to %20Mayor %209 -12- I 1 [1 ].docr vl i September 12, 2011 The Honorable James B. Hovland Mayor, City of Edina C1 4801 W. 501, St. Edina, MN 55424 SEAL JHovland@ci.edina.mn.us OCT 2O 2011 JHovland@ci.edina.mn.us IVED Re: Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project City of Edina Dear Mayor Hovland: We; owners of property impacted.. by the Valley. Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project( "Project "), are opposed to the Project for the following reasons: 1. The streets are currently in satisfactory condition. 2. The streets appear to have the structural integrity to provide many more years of useful life based on an opinion of a Licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. The utilities have more than 34 years of useful life remaining based on. statements from Jack Sullivan, City Engineer. 4. The project is not the best use of limited resources (see page 1 of the Capital Improvement Program). 5. Detailed documentation of need has not been provided. We Petition the City of Edina to halt and defer the Project: C: \Steve \Edina\Letter to Mayor 9 -12 -1 I.docx September 12, 2011 CIrk�' The Honorable James B. Hovland \gyp. SEAL Mayor, City of Edina �� 4801 W. 50d St. 0 20 2011 Edina, MN 55424 REC yEp JHovland@ci.edina.mn.us Y Re: Valley Estates Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project -- City of Edina Dear Mayor Hovland: We, owners of property impacted by the Valley Estates. Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project ( "Project "), are opposed to the Project for the following reasons: 1. The streets are currently in satisfactory condition. 2. The streets appear to have the structural integrity to provide many more years of useful life based on an opinion of a Licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. The utilities have more than 34 years of useful life remaining based on statements from Jack Sullivan, City Engineer. 4. The -project- is not the best use of limited resources (see page 1 of the Capital Improvement-Program). 5. Detailed--documentation of need has not been provided. We-Petition the City of Edina to halt and defer the Project. G......4....e N.mm� CDAntnAl ArlArnee deswe// 3�', "Wki11_S l //6 C.,i &Pk f///e`l &. CASteve\Edina\Letter to Mayor 9- 12- 11.docx DATE RECE C em—— City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 1 $ L 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 OCT 2 0 2011 (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX (612) 927 -5461 TDD REC VED PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PI PERMANENT STREET OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER ILT AeV D ESL �,Q(UL��.�aD T o the Mayor and City CounciL• � SEwE�. �P ��S,�VG) ►VN CrOk V41I- �S �9fi-S The perso ns who have signed this petition ask the City Council ksider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. I,.�! aad ADDRESS OF IMPROVEMENT BV RMUT NAME Lb ElL. L / v and ADDRESS — "VmV nv QV0V VT NAME ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM TIRE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) This petition was circulated by: �^' B -P &G A" (f S ) '► /Lt�dzD I� Y'. (o � � 3�s 4 51 jj-rr, l4e))y c'zdy c�eekY *LL6' feyr 5(hAl AR9(h roan �qe -4M-0 -uY .. gsSz -�L�- Ss. NAME ADDRESS PHONE mfX# 5(pv�*Y- (0(0;z5 mlAhic � '- 0)15 7- . 0) Zb- 7158 There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2009 49'x' City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL $ 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 •' (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: CURB AND GUTTER b�qLr An 567 -ca— &W RC'O To the Mayor and City Council: t SEwejt xe eor 5,8Z.Uch0)\j 69 creek vac -LG �s fi s The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. creek vdGc,e-1 6W LOCATION OF MROVEMENT BY STREET N,0 ADDRESS bI C ',D r1 tjt; � CI'rC /e between and_ I OF EUPROVEMENr BY STREET NAME ADDRESS evzi %.4 R between and OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS /0 )9 L di E J2. t- 1\/ between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) Ll- F-4e 44 Pik u SGI�S PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 66 �tf 5 tst.rtol� a /tat , . ��.;�� 6sZa s��•ydw d A SAN This petition was circulated by: -R�" a,0 AA 6 Ie- b r. (01a 3as 4°151 j"o ) -'oly coZoy Creek 09 �Pd q52- °1)q -0)V.2 pfyr SchN10Ab.9(h roan I P,.,gt4QX cN . g5z -c7z1- Ss8°t NAME y►'1 f J�Q S L'P V�PAM (p (a S /W �{ DI L �- PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. 6) 152- - �i Z b - -% SS APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL ,4 4801 West 50`h Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 •.�, (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET IQ SURFACING WITH ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: CURB AND GUTTER N)9Lr AND D � 09Q "Ced To the Mayor and City Council: t .sEw EdZ XP e J» s eZ.vefiC)\j �g_ a Rk VALLG � 6S �fifS The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements list above to the locations listed below. C re e k VP tt e' `j A 0M between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT STREET jgAME ADDRESS ADDRESS "AbI ! -,D rj76T/ C�1 rC /e between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS S CA dyn % ,4- R )) between and LOC TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS `_ )9 L J) E DZ.. t- I\J between and LOCATION OF ENPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 0g:Me_ i rC -mea-c cr &201 C res-k 06W!!, STFv% IV TWf TEVIr1 e CZO 1 CRC (_i /, yALLr y A Q s 1044 Word IC' OW This petition was circulated by: N BAc-(.Ac0 Cosy-► /jvjxblc Dr. (o /a 3.,;�9_4 5') j4e),y CO20y creek W9LLr�jqd �e Y S(h1N '0AbA(h 0221 f3ACQCX UV . g5Z -VIZ7- 59'9'01 NAME ADDRESS PHONE Yr►l)� SC�v�►�, -JPr co(o ,25 AAAbIL ��- There is space for more signatures on the back. ` Z - °) Z b APRIL 2008 49tA• I City of Edina, Minnesota o A / CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50`h Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 •.�• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY �% PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH ❑ WATER MAIN , ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: CURB AND GUTTER N)Q(L7' L f�ev To the Mayor and City Council: t 576-we-it xeCaPs,KvchC-),j fv6:� C1re & vat-L-C-"'q) � es �fifs The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements list above to the locations listed below. creek yAGu. i Aar between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT STREET AME ADDRESS ADDRESS iVDAbl (- �,�)'��V17 rcl2 between and LOCATION OF U9PROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS S C /; "D % .4 R )) between and LOC T10N OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS R L. ib E J2. I- /\/ between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES ' BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 4291, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) JORn n.4- �R AJ S o n/ PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) (0304 BAW-� This petition was cir fated by: �N a A&(. AA� (o s � � /u,�t� is �Y'. (alp 3�s 4°�SI j ►,�, 14e) y cpzoq PfPr S(hNnXbA(11 roan) &91,0" 1W g5Z -q2,7- sss NAME Mf )/v 5 C'P V�eAr- (o (a,2 S There is space for more signatures on the back. �� -� %�'l �- rgare-t %��rn.�a•n G azas,D�. /�G- hy. PHONE z- o) -z b- 715-8 / ✓rte - 951¢ d 1"s A, City of Edina, Minnesota 0 9 CITY COUNCIL .� 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 •,.� (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY Pj PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: CURB AND GUTTER /gL7- Aavp L� C� To the Mayor and City Council: t .576-A xeearsnvG}1Cfil CrOk vpt.LE � 6s �fi�s The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements list above to the locations listed below. aq AW -Drj'V6'1Cl'rC F9eYar.4 n y DN OF IMPROVEMENT B1 )9 L 1b EIfl- I- between and ADDRESS ADDRESS between and ADDRESS between and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS between and ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 4299 MINNESOTA STATUTES. ,1 I OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) OAR J UdAd 6443 NordU-., G`✓otP This petition was circulated by: -0,0N B4O4-GAA40 co s) "y-b 1c br- (0,ja 3as4�S1 JI'r) -, ) '<e) ly cozay creek V'09U-S� d o52- 0))q_C��a� !LTr 5(hN '0A%A(11 (0221 gAGa " tw g57Z -012-7- SSS°1 NAME m 0Q s c o v4EDY D(Ep(SS 5 W ICI L � r- PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. 6) `5 2- - °) Z 19 APRIL 2008 49'�'�.�.y City of Edina, Minnesota c� e T CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 501b Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 ••,,�.�• (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING STORM SEWER ❑ -SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING fR OTHER: _. 66 . CURB AND GUTTER Ait-r ,9evp D6 E� aQ�f�LI gCdD To the Mayor and City Council: t 5 -nme t Xe eors,B�,Ve}10-ri �g_ erRk es )-A-MS The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. G ri'n'k VAt-(-�j Joao LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT STREET AIME iVt) bI _ DrjVC1Cl i - and ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS S c A "D I ,4 R)) between and LOC TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS / 9 L a E JL- I- N between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) T;f- _v%_&' INS) i C0C/� 4 L9 1 CSC (- ✓,` yAL Lr_ ✓i}�q 4owell 7- IllywKc u-s G11e 6 ee /i �///P� led. This petition was circulated by: u r ) -i rvwzb 1c Dr. U /.1 3,;)S ¢qS-) cp z o y ( r e e)1L y6)t -L6-� jqd 0W4.6i ba % RrRr 5(hA1'j cbA(11 fozz 1 g.19(lo " uV gSZ- oJ2.7- SS3"' NAME ADDRESS PHONE yY) l l cl2 5 C V -j e r (p (a 5 Al-gA bl c 3'- There is space for more signatures on the back. `� Z - of Z b - 7 SS APRIL 200B City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: g CITY COUNCIL . $ 4801 West Se Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 -.�• (952) 927-8861- .(952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD �p� SEAL 9� PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OCT 2 0 2011 REC IVED Y ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET OTHER: P SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER I�i1 Lf AN DE7'F.d'L �QLIB2 ��! To the Mayor and City Council: Creek VOLE Estes The P ersons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. C reek yAi it. 'AaAV LOMMOxoxu�aov rr s�r m iV Abic ,prig �Cl rr e 1AWATM of,1v11 sY MM1U xn- 5CAA`rDI',4 R b �oNOF6W�VEMMWgnMff NAM . rr „Tnu tw nKPrtnv�n�rr BY SrBF�r NAQ� and ADDPMS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST= THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED” BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME GN (PRINTED) �C� ,WZ �rJ PROPERTY ADDRESS This petition was circulated by �^� Awl. A�� (o r /I.t�dzD tc Dr. (0,15 33s 4Fh5') S(hNG1tbA(h 0a2 j y g,�,ca� Y[N std 9s 02,1 -� NAME yn l )xi 5 C p v�r}eADDRESS� 5 /�f{ DI C- PHONE I. There is space for more signatures on the back. 52-- o► Z b - 7 Amu 2008 A. City of Edina, Minnesota VRE o f e CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: / L SURFACING WITH ROA�Gv 0 D CURB AND GUTTER Recwssarv(,,)aM_ To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abode �o th- locations listed below. '' VALc y �s,W BPS n/el'P b0,rh o0a ,5�" -E Ae (,o YI 5�"V G�_ 0" /I Cr OF LOCATION OF between NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS It -GL between and NAME ADDRESS between OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ?L b � C /V • between OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS a r A PY6)' ( Ph M&ZUTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THAT THEXITTM THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCIL., 1PERTY OWNER_ 6. 'SIGNATURE ` .OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) I PY74AZAds-1, 4460-M. � k"6v" 4 This petition was circulated by: Gc-pX40 .71 W It -f 1l ey and and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS O' ..W. r " PER°STAND OVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED cn51-7 "apic Dr z a y creex f/pG4E J20 a)z z / R A/_ A.riJ / i-, PROPERTY ADI (PRINTED) 6 sol 'A/;RUIL ,DA , lP sd I 6koa,n � c- 'Dr: u-c— ADDRESS ® Mrk c 5 Ga v yhfeY Co � 25" A/ o Rp ie D Y. There is space for more signatures on the back. .9/Z 32 5 yt cJ 71 01lpli 55Ac PHONE °01Ao -715-8 APRIL 2008 W-e- A �16L kt11 �a � �n r vDads -a,-r- h-ec ,s so ( 4- bn i s -h W)R, . 1 SEAL N 0 2011 City ofFdina, Minnesota SATE IVED 8 CITY COUNCIL 4801 West Se Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861- (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD - PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ja PERMANENT S SURFACING CURB AND To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City locations listed below. LIGSTING J�'OTIEM- I�l�r An► DE7'F.�L ,Qn�ll1 � sEwEe2 i�g�ons,�tucl� creQk v�c.� Estes er the huprovements listed above to the ►YD %.4 R h bthv= and OF mffWmv.BMR T3W STRm iz-0 ADDRESS ADDRESS L. A F A- L- l\/ bt wn= and IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED TM PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DET'ERlVIINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MI M.SOTA STATUTES. PROPMTVOW74WS 1 O' !' SIGNATURE 1 • \ I I V-A 0An ! PROPFB7if ADDRESS (PRUn") This petition wascirculatedby: -zWN aA1-LA"�40 &s-l-, noo" jc j . oia 3,19¢0f5') 3,101 ke1Jy (oLoy creekY09LLC�Rd PrYr SfhA mhg(h (o az, Pew ggx W . Wz- G7v -,55n NAM ynf) -4 skov.Yr}PnWD� � DID �Y = mom There is space for more signawres on the back. `5 Z - 0) Z 19 _% bz 04--lc Uo-ltcj QICIA. City of Edina, Minnesota 8 CITY COUNCIL '6 4801 West 50m Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 •� (952) 9274861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGG ING CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER A9Lr�/V DE�'E�L �QQCeb To the Mayor and City Council: 576-weo- xe eor sxv(,h(j1 Creek VALL-G n 6s POs The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. C rf e k yAG(.t L I AOM b ewm d LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT STREET AMR ' ADDRESS ADDRESS 1VyA,bjC �,DYiyc Cl rC a betw= and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS S CA "D l A- R J) betwem and ON OF MROVEMT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS EN ADDRESS !c7 )9 E between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES- PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) &Or�,q, �� ', I PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) This petition was circulated by: -0717,4 a AL (. "4A40 /voy -b is pr. (o / a 3")G,4 5) J�m l�e)ly �Zoy c�reekYdlu -6��d v,S2-�i�{ -�baY .P� r S1hmoxhg � re i2 1 &944CA LW gsz -al Z7- 559°1 NAME ADDRESS PHONE Yy111 ca scpV\�4er br0 ,2.5 W- / There is space for more signatures on the back. 5 z °J Z b i � APRIL 2008 44- 6q;1 *r.O City of Ed na, Minnesota DA CITY COUNCIL p� SEAL 4801 West 50"' Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD OCT 2 0 E RE(�IVED PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: SURFACING WITH �dADGv 0 CURB AND GUTTER RevQmsraryorjaa�_ To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abode W thb- locationslistedbelow. 1'Vgaer,1 rs)ojeS I/elP%Orhoocl .9,reed AeCax25h"V 6h 0t-j>> creek V.4a 7 490691J between and RZIC O F I MP OVE41ENT BY TREE' NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS � �) y E C1�between and LOCATION OF IMPRO NT�3Y STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS �6��Q1 between and LO TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS A If ADDRESS L" (7g<, G / y . between and JC=ON OF EVIPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS /i a i A ��G�' c Ab& THE PERSONS - WHO -:HAVE SIGNED =P - `ERSTAND THAT THE C A SSESS THE U:. SEVMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENS - MENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUN _: ~ 429, - - - OR�ZED BY CHAPTER S. P40P1MTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME . `PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED); tl� fmk e l e �zo4 OA4- k V141 ' This petition was circulated by: Jim f.5 -f I/ ey Cpsi-i A/bf?D,c Dr . 6 a o y creek 1104E u 90 (b2 2 / RAGA rent t.,/ .9/z .?z 5 9t ) Sl 95,z- Vq_01&a4 0) 5Z - 9X2 - 55A5 NAivm ADDRESS PHONE Mrk c S 1A yhfer- a(# zS' IVion p +c DY. °ISL -` 0196 - 71 SS is space for more signatures on the back. City of Edina, Minnesota e CITY COUNCIL 4801 West Se Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 •��..�• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY P PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: CURB AND GUTTER /90r AeV DL'-P� 1QQ� bib To the Mayor and City Council: t SEW of M e 0r 5,8 ch0),1 Cre & vA(.LC- � C-s � s The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements list above to the locations listed below. e k VA4c, Lf Rio between and f OF OWROVBIYIBNr SfRERT AME ADDRESS ADDRESS b►e DY�y'� Ci r�i( between and I OF EWROVRMENT BY SMUT NAIL ADDRESS ADDRESS "b A- R J) between and I OF VM%0VSMBNr BY Sn=T NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS L b E AL WV between and I HE HAPRAVEMENT BY STHEET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST TIRE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM TIRE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 4299 MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) K y I F N d- This petition was circulated by: (o s ) '1 Jim l4el i y (o z o y fear schymbg(h ezz I g►g" cN gsz -�Z�- ss8°t y NAME Mice SCjV�eArnn�(a�s PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back �% g7- - o12 b APRIL 2008 ' City of Edina, Minnesota DATE E OCIV 0 . 1 c� 8 CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50h Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 • (952) 927-8861- (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN -STORM SEWER [:1 SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY Pj PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: CURB AND GUTTER I-bgL7- AeV To the Mayor and City Council: t smm x? eors vc NN creek Esygtf-s The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. aAb betweea and Cr NAW ADDRESS ADDRESS )F IDn'BO MMW BY =--M NAMB ADDRESS ADDRESS L, m E A- L- IV between and )F IMPRAvRMBIYr BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGMA (PRUMD) (PRMTED) Ile This petition was circulated by: -Be-,Q" B Ate AAO Co s j -i rvoy-D is pr- VIA 3as 4°15'1 J,'rr, )celiy (oLOy (rCe),-Y &9vG"�Pd o�S2- °1�4 -oldaY Rehr �chN�xbACk Q0zZ X14" cN gsz -�Ja� ss8°t NAB ri►r1� s ADD ��s jWd{ DID �Y'- Pxor� There is space for more signatures on the back. Di '5 Z ' °% 2 b - 7 �� APRL 2M City of Edina, Minnesota $ CITY COUNCIL ,q 4801 West 50 Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 •+.,y�,,e• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD OCT 2 0 2011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ANT STREET OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER hh19Lr AIV To the Mayor and City Council: t SmEf, m ears vchow (vg CrOk VALL Estes The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. EWPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEN[ENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE HdPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAW PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) xi�, w ARC�nF l�>f `_ (PLO D I fi irmC, This petition was circulated by: T-nN BA (-(-AAA us-j-, /A5^2) jc Jr- to /.7- 3as 4;fS1 J�'m Ke1�y (naoy Cree)<YA L9jgd P052- 0) 1q- 0)kfay PO4r SrhN 6221 P0C uy gsz -QZI- ssg°t NAB y,1 /ka SCov�PnunxFSS�S Nv�{ bl� fir- PHONE , 5` There is space for more signatures on the back. ` Z - q 219- 7 APRIL ZOOS i� r � 1—W-7 City of Edina, Minnesota 8 CITY COUNCIL '3 4801 West 50"' Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 • (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY 51 PERMANENT STREET ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER I7l(-r To the Mayor and City Council: t SEwat Fog creek VALLG� 6S��s The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements list above to the locations listed below. r re P k MALL• e- &4 AW between end b1 c ,D rj_VC1 CI rC1 e between and OF EWpROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS "D J Q- n J) between and OF bdkoVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS i L. ®E A- WV between and [ OF DPROvEMFdff BY STRUT NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DET "]NED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGN - OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) ,,je vet� PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRUMD) 6'r�,ar-t- Sc dL_t ,A_ P--d o r) " ��b is Ths petition was circulated by: ( �Jrvr, belly (0 204 Creek Y *L-6�Pd 9r;z- 011 q -0)V -a rozz t avca rA L y • qSZ -qZ7- 5581P1 NA IE yr►! /v S C,P V A ADDxESS� 5 l�R DI c � I''- PHONE -7/5-9 There is space for more signatures on the back. `� 9219- APRIL zoos off@ City of Edina, Minnesota DATrnfT, I CITY COUNCIL SEAL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD REGELVE PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: L _RdApfN 4 AIN Recamssry G'J-) The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abooNe io the locations listed below. `' VAGGG�`/ Es1�9¢PS %UPI'C,�%b0� f10o0� Si'reei %fie Ca» C OF LOCATION OF NAME NAME LOC TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ,,&CXTION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME THAT THEE THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCIL between and : THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED ifffnFROVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED C ER' _] Pft PERTYADDRFS This petition was circulated by: 71►» '('5 -t 11 ey COs 17 Albj?A,C Nr a a y tree*, voue Ro W21 ;RA /_r,rrl w/ iNtuvm ADDRESS ® Mj'ke SGav yhfer C�t,25 NnRD%e DY. There is space for more signatures on the back. (v! z 32 5 4 O) S') sz- 9lq.°lla ,A,4 5z - 9,A? - 55AC PHONE %SL 0121n - 715- 8 r APRIL 2008 ADDRESS ADDRESS between and ADDRESS ADDRESS between and ADDRESS ADDRESS between and ADDRESS ADDRESS : THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED ifffnFROVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED C ER' _] Pft PERTYADDRFS This petition was circulated by: 71►» '('5 -t 11 ey COs 17 Albj?A,C Nr a a y tree*, voue Ro W21 ;RA /_r,rrl w/ iNtuvm ADDRESS ® Mj'ke SGav yhfer C�t,25 NnRD%e DY. There is space for more signatures on the back. (v! z 32 5 4 O) S') sz- 9lq.°lla ,A,4 5z - 9,A? - 55AC PHONE %SL 0121n - 715- 8 r APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota DATE REGBE CITY COUNCIL CITY► ,d 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 ' (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD OCT 2 0 2011 RE EIVED PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: L SURFACING WITH 0G CURB AND GUTTER RetaNssrvCr) q To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abode to the locations listed below. " VAGLg `1 Es ,W;PS n/e1' hkorhooDj ,5't're�i e Ca n S�d"V G,7" vl�Il C OF LOCATION OF I NJ) between BY TREE' NAME ADDRESS CC(,r between PV STREET NAME ADDRESS between BY STREET NAME ADDRESS \ _t!� fit, li - k C N • between ,,b ION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS TE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THAT MTHMO SESS THE THE PROPERTIES BENEFITI BY THE COUN Y CHAPTE .�; � �. a u�, +� � ►�, .. ,� and ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS TOM ATMPTAND OVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED This petition was circulated by: srm (s� 11 ey zo y creep' you - RD AME rhAch W2 / A094.,6 64 L14 ADDRESS (B M"k e S L,411 ghfeY 0 zS" AN A X) Ic by'. There is space for more signatures on the back. OP49R- �:� _ ss W4 ... _ (o1Z 325 495) M z - 9/q- °I(Pa4 rz - 9a? - 5559 PHONE °ISL 715 -8 APRIL 2008 A. �-� City of Edina, Minnesota D,4 D: o e CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th OCT 2 0 2011 Street •Edina, Minnesota 55424 REC IVED �'�• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD Rv PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑PERMANENT STREET OTHER: / L SURFACING WITH A R6ADGv G CURB AND GUTTER d2ecoNSS�ycT� va�9. To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the iihprovemdnts listed abode to the'' locations listed below. creek V'W (5y M AJ) between and RE OF IMP OVErAENT BY TREE' NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS C ri v C (r between and LOCATION OF IMPROVI�IENT AY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS 7 i . RV 1) ) A /&I U between and LOON OF U" KOVEMENT BY STREET NAME b DRESS ADDRESS etween and ION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS A RRLJ Ja TE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED FROMTAND, THAT THE SESS T OVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFI NTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNC v CT-T APP o A TT TT-" C1 f' This petition was circulated by: DOWNER'S NAMg C(PRINTED) — j �ROPERTY ADDR' F(PI(NTED) - W aFss�y�72 L � 02 s00?i 49141 ilo . CDSi7 "j?D,C Dl: a z y creek vo"e", X 4) INIUVM ADDRESS ®Mike 54av7hJ-er- Co 42.5- tvogpic DY. There is space for more signatures on the back. Cv! z 3-2 5 4 of 5'1 qg'z - I I q - 01(P,14 X152 - 9A7 - 55AC PHONE °15'2 - °0)?(o -7�S"8 APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota o @ CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL' ❑ SIDEWALK ❑. ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: DATE RECEIVED: OCT 2 0 2011 ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: 4Zr R4t)DW/7y 1gobh Rec,wsTry vTi v emu_ The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed ab6-,V to the" locations listed below. "VAG.LE�1 ESMOS lVel'h )porhood 5jf -re& /geCgn5)r0 ch-0N11 C OF LOCATION OF between and NAME ADDRESS L C (ter between and NAME ADDRESS between OF IMPROVEMEN T BY STREET NAME ADDRESS �& -K 6 / v • between OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS A TE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THAT THE T • Xr. - [1LYTf1!'1 -- -: THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCIL . M,7-i -, am. ER ., S SIGNATURE 'L • � Y This petition was circulated by: Vi9i11 9115f G4iodz JIM, ISM 1l ey r `h. AME ® Mrk c 5 4,4 v yhfer- There Is spa( d 4. i and and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS PTE'~ROVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED C99/7 A1bf{2)JC Dr z o y creep, 1101./ - - Ij 124) ADDRESS 052!! tvogblc by" :e for more signatures on the back .vJz ?z5 �}c)S'1 9 Sz - 91I/- c' (Pa 9s2.- 9a*7 - 55h9 PHONE 9sz -e,9a(v - -7 15- 8 APRIL 2008 q9x.%t-&- City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: o e CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 ' •�' (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD - C SEAL PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL AEC,EIV EgFjv 01 En ❑ SIDEWALK D ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERxt�v ` ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: / SURFACING WITH ROADW yQ CURB AND GUTTER ReCoNSSary To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the iinprovemelits listed ab q'We t6 "th6' locations listed below. ''r/Al.[ff-/ Fs1i9BPS l�lel�h%d�'hao0� St'r'ee3 �eCtir�SJa"V G970N11 CiC° between and ON OF IMP OVEIyIENT BY /�ETNAME ADDRESS ADDRESS C U-r between and LOCATION OF IMP O ENT STREE NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS l C 2 I Al. between and �1Ch1ION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS A PYI—)' E: �TIHE P ERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED T TAND THAT THE SESS T OVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITI MENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUN - v rii A �rr'n . -- ...,_,...� -.. "RTV OWNEIV,S� bWNER'S -NAMD "_ PRO IS PERTY ADDRESS ( l NAT _ (PRINTED) This petition was circulated by: Jt m fs.q I/ ey Cps/-7 AARDIC P : ro z a y c Pe.k ? }2D W2 i ;R'0/- a,_zP /.*./ ADDRESS Q Ork e 5 6.4 v yhfeY Ca G 2-5, Al n Rp it DY. There is space for more signatures on the back. (o) z 3z5 4OISI Sz - PHONE °ILL- `'OlZ(o 71 S8 APRIL 2008 A. City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: o� e ' CITY COUNCIL \� GITk�, 4801 West 50 Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 i ',�• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD OCT 2 0 2011 �f IE PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: X /. SURFACING WITH ROAPW CURB AND GUTTER ReCaNssary cT) q". To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed ab6-V io "tl'6- locations listed below. "VAjcEry E'510;PS n/el'Worhnodl Sf're� �eC9r� S ja^(� G�7 v�11 A OF IMPROVEMENT BY LOCATION OF between and NAME ADDRESS ( I gc.(,L- between STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS V / ).. ) 1& ti U between and OF h ROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS PC SQL y CRI (, /V • between b ION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS E: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THAT THE SESS T THE PROPERTIES BENEFIT BY THE COUN ® Y CHAPTE 9, This petition was circulated by: Jim /5--P // ev P�RI , f D) I-Ro Cc, r Lv- 4i, and ADDRESS rIMPROVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED (PRINTED) Sad Aldld46, dP_J)'_P_ 6SzC) Nbr-j .l e Tr- &5/7 "flZ),C Dr: cc zoy creep, vau.E? 90 W / /RJ4GAfew /AJ INAlyir, ADDRESS ® Mrkc 5G,Ov yhfeY 057.5' A/edtD%6 DY. There is space for more signatures on the back. 5 4 on-1 ___C�sz - 9a? - 55AI PHONE 715-8 APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota o CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 501h Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 l ',�• (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: DATE RECEIVED: OCT 2 0 P011 ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: / L RdADow-1 d 19oob,0 RecaNsSry Grp d rj. The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abI6 Wthe , locations listed below. "V,91- ,G- 1 ES W;pS IV Pl PborhooDj C OF rWr.OVEly &T BY,STREET NAME LOCATION OF NAME between and ADDRESS ADDRESS between and ADDRESS ADDRESS between and BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS w i PS s�L dJ LZ` G / y • between ACTION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS TE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THAT THE SESS T THE PROPERTIES BENEFIT MET BY THE COUN This petition was circulated by: $�i9� $�GLind� S�'> L= — r - /- — .7 1M" /S4 Il ey Wk? 7i-N AR dh AQvv, and ADDRESS ANAMOMMMINVERSTAND 477MOVE,MENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED (0517 "J{DJIC hr Co zc y creej� V'V44ev A0 a)Z z / ;R,41— h mew / ../ ADDRESS ® Mrk c 5 La v 7hfe>' ZS" N n A Die D Y. There Is space for more signatures on the back. Cv I z 32 5 4 q SI ;sz -91 q- 01&a4 52,- 9a? - 558c PHONE 9s2, ° 01 27 (0 - -7 a APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RE EIVED: o� CITY COUNCIL CITVC 4801 West 501h Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 SEAL ' �• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD OCT 2 0 2011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING 1AOTHER: L I? del P(wy d,9A AD ? �etcNSSrv�r�o�a. The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the iinprovem&Ats listed abo'Ve To the locations listed below. ''r/A�G�y rSM�PS n/PI'Qhbod"hpo0� ,S�r2ef AeC9»5�"UG�7�v1,JJ WOF �O�i LOCATION OF BY,STREET NAME NAME between ADDRESS between ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS kmv 1)) Aj 1-i U between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS L C N • between and ION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS TE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED AND THAT THE C SESS THE OVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITI MENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUN V CHAPTV 74 'TTTrV10Q PERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME' (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) This petition was circulated by: 'T I !t -e // ey Milo — c_i — Cog/7 "flZ))c Dr. Cv 2 a t� �7'PPk voac- u Ad) Cc2Z / f�AGric�t Ln/ 114 Alvin ADDRESS ® M"k c 5 1,411 ghAer 0[ 2-5 N e a p,c D Y. There Is space for more signatures on the back. CoJ ?25 4 OJ5J �52 - 9X2 - 5589 PHONE APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: CITY COUNCIL IT ''*\ 4801 West 50t� "Street •Edina, Minnesota 55424 '' (952) 927 -8861 • (952).927- 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 - TDD OCT 2 0 2011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: L SURFACING WITH /�dADW 0 D CURB AND GUTTER ReccNs7, ycT) QM_ To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed ab6V 10 thie ` locations listed below. VAGG(r`/ EsM PS /VP/' h%drhooa creek V1414 61i AM) between and v A�TIO OF MO OVEWNT BY TREES NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS v & C Cr between and LOCATION OF STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS S C'. N 1 fLL,,��_GG��///l between and LO4TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME 'ADDRESS ADDRESS it, U L`�� C. / y • between OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THAT THEE THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCIL PRTPERTY OW E S', ,-OWNER'S NAN% Twr This petition was circulated by: f3�9i✓ $�G�p� ch- AME ® Mr'k e 5 GAv yhfer- There Is spa( and ADDRESS WDYR-STAND PMPTOWEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED ( ;PR- P�fi'Y E . ITRMA &9/7 "FD)C 2 a y Creek v, C-4e I J24) W2 / B oge"b ecl? L/J ADDRESS 042-5 NnatPic DY, ;e for more signatures on the back. (v/2 ?z5 40)SI q 5,z - V q. 0(&,A4 �15z - 9X2 - 55V PHONE 9SL 0) Z!v - 71 "E3 APRIL 2008 eovvaCity of Edi na, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD �O� SEAL �`� OCT 2 0 2011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL RE,�,Eo ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: L SURFACING WITH Rd-Pov 0 CURB AND GUTTER RecaNSSry VT) v M. To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abd*v to'the locations listed below. " VAC.GGr �l ES M BPS %V e1 h%d rh uoa Creek V,, a&,y A04)) between and OCyA�T O OF IMP OVEIyIENT BY TREE' NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS v C I V C(,C between and I:OCATION OF BU Rte- E STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LO(,&TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS i ..r !(,- V L_�� L / y • between and OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS THAT THEE THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCJAL, A/ a i THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED PMVRV TAND P OVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED ADDRESS PR PERTY OWNER'S-, OWNER'S NAM,- SIGNATURE -) (PRINTED) � This petition was circulated by: Jim /t -t 1/ ey Ch. AME ® Mrk e 5 4,4V ghfer- There Is spa( 049/7 MbgD,c Dr. re x 0 y creeg 11.q e v JzD W Z AGE tw ADDRESS CoG zS NoA ble DY. ;e for more signatures on the back PROPERTY_' ADDRESS' (PRINTED) M Co/ 2 32 5 4 0J5'1 9!5,z —11 q_ CY(cIA i PHONE °!S2,- `'012 (o -71 5-8 APRIL 2008 �i City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: CITY COUNCIL / 4801 West 501h Street Y Edina, Minnesota 55424 CITY (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD �,�� SEAL 9� OCT 2 0 2011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Y C IVED ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: / yL SURFACING WITH R6.�DGv a CURB AND GUTTER d2eCcNSSrvvr) ohV. To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the'mprovemertts listed abode to thi- -- locations listed below. VAt-cEr %1 ES),o BPS n/Plhb od"%000 , jf'I"ef''i' Ae cv n 5j'd"V ch- vm 1) Creek V'666y AD. between OF IMP OVEIgENT BY TREE' NAME ADDRESS WE C CLe- between LOCATION OF IMPROV N,Tp STREET NAME ADDRESS �_ jW h J iA U between OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS l � ,M- dJ �/, U / y • between and DCAIION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS 7- A ff G)' (P TE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED TAND THAT THE T SESS THE OVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITI MENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUN v ri4APTT is c p" I► � 's petition was circulated by: a?,N(Alf41 -110vzz &9/1 Mbf D)C Dr Jim /S-t 11 ey 6 20 y creek vou.E uo AME c ch QaE Z / B fI Gl� •'/2 w ADDRESS ®!' 1'ke S4.4v7hfer CoGzS ApoRplc by,. There Is space for more signatures on the back. OPERTYMD fP� IUNTE�) Co12 ?2 5 4 OfSJ -5z - ql q- 01&,A 5z - 9a? - S510 PHONE °1SL _0 91?(0 - -7 S"8 APRIL 2008 ��. City of Edina, Minnesota o� B CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50`' Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 ',�• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: L iwpov 0 e�ecaNSrrv�r� a>r�. The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abdW to the locations listed below. "VAGLGry ESM PS lVef h )porho00 51 -1.2& AeLQ ".5)rV ch -om1i C OF LOCATION OF between NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS � (,I between and NAME ADDRESS BY STREET NAME �. Q/ %.- / v ION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME THAT THE -M THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCIL. between ADDRESS between ADDRESS /",/ a i A !P'G)' (PA THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE , (PRINTED) This petition was ci and and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS FINWROVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED V. - k1fi�.0vzz 05n Dr. s/0" (.5 -t !l ey 6 za y creek i/ac-4el 94) VNne r S ch iv a r hA' rh razz / R,41- A,e j? t.#,[ iv,�vm ADDRESS ® Mrk e S10 yhfeY 042S A /oapie- by,. There Is space for more signatures on the back. PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) i .0/2 32 5 � °)s sz - 911/ - CY&Aj sz - %A? - 55&1 PHONE 952 °9Zl9 - 7 5'8 APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: CITY COUNCIL CIT. 4801 West 50 Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 ',•®' (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD L OCT 201011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL RE 1 E° / ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: / L �ZdJ3DW 4 D . ReCcNssry c,T) o". The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improve melits listed abode io the locations listed below. "V,9110-,1 rs W BPS No � % ht o rh o oa 5J -reef Ae Co n ,5/7" V Ch- O N f l C OF IMPjzOVElyIE1VT BYrSTREE� NAME LOCATION OF IMPTtO ENT STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME &4b 61v. ION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME THAT THEE THE PROPERTIES BY THE COi7NCH- is between ADDRESS between ADDRESS between 1:07 ADDRESS and ADDRESS and between and ADDRESS 1017 A nyG) [ da I THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED f =O—VNER SS-NAM E'7 -- 5I�dI/1e kowlv"� This petition was circulated by: (�9i✓ $�G�ioJ� 71 IS-t 11 ey AME ® lark e 5 Ga v yhfer There Is spat ADDRESS ADDRESS l�F- N'll'EI�NTAND WOTREE7NTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED MMT ♦ L ES. Co si � iVt�� A, c Dr cbz Z / 8 09e"b ' L/J ADDRESS ��yS" NneZD +� DY. ;e for more signatures on the back WP TPADDUSS (v!z 325 40)5'l PHONE 67SL °126 -7!5-8 APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota o CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 501h Street o Edina, Minnesota 55424 ' (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: L RQADW Alk 0 RecaNssry vr) I m. ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: DATE RECEIVED: OCT 2 0 2011 The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed ab6-V i6 the locations listed below. "VA rs W PS /Vel,hkorho00j Si'reei %�e La Std"V G�7� v J�JJ C OF LOCATION OF between and NAME ADDRESS i CI5 between ADDRESS and . NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS 16"6 C / • between OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ^j a i - AffZ-l'c • �r I 1 -� ► �r,� (► 1 _ r_r:,1017C•�`'ni��Zs�i:l�tl1: _ ' .� \ilJbA: i?Y1�TER'S NAME=_ Na'mCa A. (,))fac1,letl This petition was circulated by: ,Tim (.5 -t ey and ADDRESS ADDRESS !rIMPROVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED &917 "X?Z)IC (v z cc/ creek P'vae 1 J20 mz 2 i / IKI _R °�7 S C--" (PRINTED) ADDRESS ® I rk e S LAV yhfer- Cod 25 Na,tD +G DY. There is space for more signatures on the back. Col z ?z549-')J PHONE 9sz - °O)Av - ? Sa APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: o @ CITY COUNCIL C7? 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 - (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927 -5461 TDD L t 0 2p 2011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET I OTHER: L SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER dteCoNSSarV�?-�Q�. To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed 66-Ve Wth' locations listed below. `'VAGGCr,/ �'5,W PS I/Pl�h%orbo0a 5tree� �eL4Y�5�"V G%� v1�ll C OF LOCATION OF between NAME ADDRESS CCr between NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS between and BY STREET NAME ADDRESS I (i V (7(j<_ G / y , between_ OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME THAT THEE THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCIL ADDRESS THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED PRO ERTl' -C.wn —S NA - (PRINTE _ (f14 This This petition was circulated by: J! ►r+ /S t ll ey ah /VI and ADDRESS ADDRESS ROVi D' PERSTAND 00TWE MMEEWN TS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED. Cush "j?Z),C Dr 6 2 o y creek /20 022 / R 101 —h ie"Ft / N iNtllym ADDRESS ® Mrk e yhfe>r Cot z!S 1V n g D +c D Y. There is space for more signatures on the back. =PA PERTY W1)_ SS C P_MU 'sn�/f /,Z 3-2 5 )S') 92, Z- 91q_°1(P'A'1 - Ca? - 55A" PHONE &752- 9;?(0 - 715- 8 APRIL 2008 r�1 City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEIVED: o� @ CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 t' (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD O� SEAL �9 OCT 2 0 2011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, REC 1VEo ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: ,L . SURFACING WITH 6ADGv G CURB AND GUTTER d?eCcNssrv'c7) o>n9. To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the im' provemeilts listed aboNe to the" locations listedbelow. "1/Alc.Ery ESM PS n/e!'gh%orhooa Creek; Vi a 6v Mai) between v and v OCAT O N OF IMP OVENENT BY TREE' NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS C C(,r between and LOCATION OF IMP OV NT STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS 118�_ between and LO _ION OF IMPROVEMENT BYY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS S �L' y (_ /V • between OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS Afar Aff6)'cPhl k%jmATQTE- THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THAT THE—Crri THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCIL -- PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME :.SIGNATURE _(1PRINTED)` bru f cA This petition was circulated by: J /tea (.5 -e // ey AME wh. ® Mrk e yhfeY There is spa( 9 and ADDRESS , C�11TD'ER�STAND ROVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED PROPERTY ADDRESS 17(P 66 l NorJ1 c.ONe. �7d)06)/'Wssy3 C95i7 wcaflD,c .Dr. 62cy creeg varrcu j20 ADDRESS Cc1425" fvoApie bye. ,e for more signatures on the back Cv J z �2 5 9t of SJ Of (n1 J• visa - 9a) - 5589 PHONE °1Sz ' 9;?(n - 715- 8 APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota DATE Im 0 9 CITY COUNCIL kr4` SEAL 4801 West 50"' Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 0 2011 • ,�• (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD CF-2-0 20 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL - --= ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER kqL7- i94V D�EDZ QQQ� P�C� To the Mayor and City Council: t sEwedt xeeor -s zvc IL (P\j Fog a0k \14LLsr � r✓S �fifS The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements list above to the locations listed below. ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: creek yptte LOCATION OF 11UPROVEMENT "Abic Dr) LOCATION OF EUPROVEMENT 0AD between and ET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS Cf rC /e between and V STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOC/ TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME /F %9 L 10 E 19- t- A / LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME and . ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEF nNG FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 4299 MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) �i•�lo,J PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) T2- C� eel. y.11en (e(e,6(2- CIea 114r - e 5 S , �f i ZA"O -& Af,✓ 'Isysr This petition was circulated by: I c pr- u/ a 3 s 4 S 1 j)-m creek v44-6��qd PA Y gAoCA W . g57-a77-7- Ssb NAME j'!'1 �) CQ S L V ADDRESS �{ �1 C �.- PHONE Pr cvca�5 /W i� There is space for more signatures on the back. o)57-- °I Z b i S APRIL 2008 OCT 2 0 2011 �9�'"' City of Edina, Minnesota DATE & )CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50 Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 � (952) 927-8861- (952) 927 -7645 FAX - (612) 927-5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANTTARY.SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: CURB AND GUTTER /-L� Aav DE£dZ ,Ql>�I Rt~,eD To the Mayor and City Council: SE(lU Ede. P �?Y� S,VG � C1re�k � The persons who have. signed this petition . ask the City Council to consider the improvements list above to the locations listed below. ' k I/A4CC ti AoN) between and )FIMPROVEIMM STREET AME ADDRESS ADDRESS )IC ,D)rJ'Vf CI rC% between and )F IMPROVEMENTHY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS VDI'A- /2 b between and )F DaWVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS L in E J2— I.1 V between and EffORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE 114PROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM'THE IMPROVEMENTS. IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) r 1-Cl JAAJ LZ n &G&W This petition was circulated by: on^r B A`G AA4b (o r) i je hr. . 0 /A 3�s 4 51 S►'rr, 1 -'ePy (zay creek Y49 L-C�Rd 9152- OW4 -0) 14 '/ ,Pf )tY S(hN0Ab.9f ► roaz t fi-W14CA W q5'z -g2.1- 55"n rrnt yn I )�¢ S v PAI)DltFSS� S" /�/ ANC � Y - PHONE There's 1 y L- o► z b- City of Edina, Minnesota DATE ED: CITY COUNCIL c 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 SEAL ' (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD OCT 2 0 2011 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: L SURFACING WITH RLIAPGV G CURB AND GUTTER ReCcNssrvcr) oaf. To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abode Wthei - locations listed below. '' 1/gC.GG� y E'51W ¢pS %V e� Pborho0a s- f-re�i j�e �o y� S j�, v Gh. 01'j /I creek V, 6&-� 09 d 4A between - OF OF IMP OVEMENT BY TREE' NAME ADDRESS C Q r be tween LOCATION OF EVIPROVWNT PY STREET NAME ADDRESS �- _ and ADDRESS and ADDRESS between and OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS �& b 6K C N • between and OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS THAT THE' (. i THE PROPERTIES BY THE COUNCIL- AP 4P6)' THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED T 101WI 'ER -TAN" r OVEMENTS AGAINST IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED ADDRESS ADDRESS 9 ZrcurEIrrYOWNTt'S _OWl . 511 PO ERTY_ADDR SWWATUR:E P� RRINTED). ( TED This petition was circulated by: Viq"(Af1'4 -'Vxzz Cp4;i'7 "XDJC pr. Co Z a(/ o Pe)< Vol t.E f20 ®`NC"Vij-4 ADDRESS YY� rk c 51Av yhfeY 0 25' NoRPie by'. There Is space for more signatures on the back. .012 3z 5 yt 0 J.S') 9SZ -9/41 - °llA'j 9a? - sssr PHONE °/SZ `92(V - %1$�8 APRIL 2008 0111 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Vill. B From: Scott Neal City Manager ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: November 1, 2011 Subject: Correspondence Received From The Minnesota Restaurant Association ACTION REQUESTED: Direct staff to invite the Minnesota Restaurant Association to an upcoming Council meeting to present their concerns. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: We have received the attached letter from the Minnesota Restaurant Association. Staff suggests inviting representatives from the Association to present their concerns in person. M1111111ESOTA q(ESTAURANT ASSOCIATION October 12, 2011 Mr. Scott Neal City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 - 1394 Dear Scott, On behalf of our member restaurants and hotels, I am writing to request a review of section 900 of the Edina City Code dealing with the sale of liquor and wine. Our members are particularly concerned about section 900.12 subd. 7 on "sale prices." We believe it would be useful to have a discussion with you, City staff, the police department, licensees and the community about this section of the ordinance. It would be helpful to have a better understanding of the policy goals of the provision. Our members find it very difficult to comply with the current language while remaining competitive with venues in surrounding communities. Thank you for the opportunity to raise this important subject. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Dan McElroy Executive Vice President Minnesota Restaurant Association cc: Debra Mangen City Clerk 305 Roselawn Avenue East, St. Paul, MN 55117 -2031 ■ (651) 778 -2400 ■ fax (651) 778 -2424 industry website www.hospitalitymn.org ■ consumer website www.hospitalitymn.com OWNERS REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VIII. C. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: NOVEMBER 1, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. "CE V E0 10 -23 -11 OCT 2 8 2011 To: Representative Keith Downey, Edina Mayor James Brindle, Josh Sprague & Ann Swenson (copy to MAC) Edina Board Members Joni Bennett, Mary I am enclosing a video as a follow up to my previous correspondence requesting your involvement in helping control the huge increase of noise from airplanes over the Edina area this year and also attaching a copy of the decibel readings recorded on the video. I recorded the decibels of noise generated by the airplanes over our home at 6113 St Johns Avenue using a Extech 407730 40 -to- 130 - decibel Digital Sound Level Meter. It has a 2dB accuracy with 0.1dB resolution. The recordings were taken in 2011 when the airplane noise became a noticeable problem and a detriment to my health. My husband has lived here 35 years (I have live here ten) and this is the first year the plane noise has changed to the point where it is destroying our quality of life. No airplanes that were recorded were left out due to low decibels. The average decibels of the 41 flights recorded is 67.3 decibels. With the continuous, loud, non -stop traffic over our home this year, late into the night and starting early in the morning (beyond 10:30 PM and before 6:00 AM) my health has deteriorated significantly. By looking at the MAC Flight Tracker @ http: / /ai)p.macnoise.com/flighttracker/ and by selecting Static Flight Tracks for a 24 hour period of time choosing any day, you can see the immense amount ofairline traffic being directed over Edina this year. The monthly reports will give you the statistics of the increases of airline traffic over each Monitoring Tower. We have no tower in our area but number seven is the closest to the traffic over my home. By looking at the trend, Edina will not continue to be a desirable community to reside in, indeed - it isn't desirable in our area. I have three questions to put to you. Question Number One: Does constant, loud noise hurt health? Yes. The State regulates noise and has determined noise to be a health issue. 7030.0040 NOISE STANDARDS. Subpart 1. Scope. "These standards describe the limiting levels of sound established on the basis of present knowledge for the preservation of public health and welfare." More information on health hazards of noise can be found at The Franklin Institute Resources for Science Learning. Following is just a tiny part of their research: Low -Level Noise and Stress - Research mg Not just loud or sudden noises provoke a stress response. Chronic low -level noise also negatively influences the brain and behavior. Whether from the road or in the office, low - intensity noise has a subtle yet insidious effect on our health and well- being. Noise at home or school can affect children's ability to learn. Compared to kids from quieter neighborhoods, children living near airports or busy highways tend to have lower reading scores and develop language skills more slowly. Psychiatric hospitalizations are higher in noisy communities. Bad moods, lack of concentration, fatigue, and poor work performance can result from continual exposure to unpleasant noise.= Page 2 According to Dr. Alice H. Suter, an audiologist at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: "Included in noise - related problems are high blood pressure, peptic ulcers, cardiovascular deaths, strokes, suicides, degradation of the immune system, and impairment of learning. Noise is also associated with an increase in aggression and a decrease in cooperation." � Noisy Neighborhoods a Nuisance- Reports _ �nann�immreint "The U.S. Census Bureau reports that Americans cite British investigators found that a greater amount of noise — more than crime, litter, traffic, or inefficient neighborhood problems, including noise, was associated government — as the biggest problem affecting their with residents being three times as likely to say their neighborhoods. 13 8 million people are regularly physical function was impaired and twice as likely to exposed to noise levels labeled as excessive by the report poorer health. "What we think is happening is Environmental Protection Agency. "' that neighborhood stress influences the biological processes that promote disease risk," said Dr. Andrew Steptoe of University College London.' More information on the health hazards caused by noise can be found at The Franklin Institute Resources for Science Learning at http://www.R.edu/leam/brain/stress.html#stressnoise Question Number Two: Is the Metropolitan Airport and State aware of the health risks cause by noise? Of course they are. As noted above the State has declared under 7030.0040 NOISE STANDARDS - "These standards describe the limiting levels of sound established on the basis of present knowledge for the preservation of public health and welfare." The airport has mitigated homes that are exposed to 60+ DB. Question Number Three: Should the Metropolitan Airport Have a Right to Destroy Health? . .. ........ No agency should have the right to do that — Government or otherwise. Question Number Four: DOES ANYONE CARE? Isn't this what our government and elected officials are here for? To protect the people? Barbara Polich 6113 Saint Johns Avenue, Edina, MN 55425 Recorded decibel levels of airplanes from Minneapolis Airport going over 6113 St. Johns Avenue, Edina Mn 55434 during 2011. Douglas & Barbara Polich (30 min. video) No planes were cut out of video due to low noise levels. All that were recorded are included. Listed Below are the decibel levels of planes in video. Various days. Not necessarily the loudest days. 68.8 67.7 67.7 77.6 April 66.6 6:15 AM 65.2 67.7 78.4 65.6 66.0 67.4 63.8 7:26 AM 67.8 63.3 64.1 67.0 Oct. 13 60.0 65.9 68.0 65.9 67.1 66.6 9 /� q-TS FL l� ' 67.5 i 76.3 67.0 Oct 13 7:15 AM 7:17 AM 66.3 7:20 AM 68.1 &-713 Db 68.8 Oct 20 7:29 AM 75.4 3:30 PM 68.7 66.4 Oct 22 57.8 I J�. t�' 68.0 5.42 PM 02i`f�%} C� 66.0 5.44 PM 68.0 5.45 PM 77.8 5.45 PM 63.9 5.46 PM 55.9 5.52 PM i 69.0 5.53 PM 68.7 5.54 PM 60.5 5.55 PM I I Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 8:19 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: city counsel members Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnoaci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business We're a do.torm working to make the healthy choice the easy choice;,! From: Gloria Cooper [ mailto :aloriacooperartCcbgmail.coml Sent: Thursday, October 27, 20116:25 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: city counsel members rnECOVE OCT 2 g 2011 To whom it may concern, The Edina Art Center has been an important part of my family's life for the 25 years we have lived here. The classes are great and the shows have been wonderful It also provides a needed place for artists and others to meet and converse. I hope all the members of the council will continue to support this vital place where beauty can be created and enjoyed. The setting is perfect and the building very welcoming. Not all students learn the same way and this place offers an alternative way to be successful. Thank you for support. r Gloria Cooper Gloria Cooper http: //www.gloriacooperart.com/ olte REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VIII. C. DEBRA MANGEN F-1 'Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion Information Date: NOVEMBER 1, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of an e-mail and an e- comment received after the packets were delivered to you. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:24 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: City Council members Nov 0 1 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist -------------- 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 0389 -- {`� Ibiunno(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Farnilies Doing Business Were a do.town ... working to make the heallhy choice the easy choice! From: Larry 1. Nesbitt [mailto:l nesbittCcbcomcast.netl Sent: Monday, October 31, 20114:17 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: City Council members am aware of the ongoing order for residents on the corner of Sally Lane to cut down their hedge and evergreen trees. It is my understanding that an independent study and recommendation has been done by the home owner and RLK that would not be so invasive on the property. , I urge the council to adopt these findings and recommendations as a reasonable and sensible solution. I have lived on Valley View Road for 27 years and cannot ever recall an accident of a fender bender at the intersection. Larry J. Nesbitt Manufacturers Representative 7132 Valley View Road Minneapolis, MN. 55439 tel /fax (952) 944 -0139 email:I nesbitta- comcast.net "Support your State Business' and local Representatives" 1 Susan Howl it From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:01 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: League of Women Voters Edina Meetings on Voter I.D. pn(� Rj� ECEU V E® Nov 0 1 2011 �-- -- - -- -- #-ARC Lynette Biunno, Receptionist J , ; 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 'r IbiunnoO- ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business We're a do.town ... working to make the healthy choice the easy choice! From: Suzanne Kerwin [mailto:skerwin(�comcast.netl Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 12:16 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: League of Women Voters Edina Meetings on Voter I.D. The Mayor and members of the City Council are invited to- League of Women Voters Edina Meetings on Voter I.D. Thursday Nov. 10 at 9:45 AM at Edina Grandview Library Saturday Nov. 12 at 9:45 AM at Edina City Hall The public is cordially invited to meetings on the topic, "Voter Photo -ID ", sponsored by the League of Women Voters, Edina. Learn about voter ID, whether it is needed in Minnesota, its costs, and how it would impact many groups of eligible voters. The new documentary "Democracy for All? The Barriers of Voter ID ", produced by LWV Minnesota, will be screened at both meetings. Discussion will follow. This 17- minute documentary includes interviews with election officials on Minnesota's election safeguards, and with people whose right to vote will be threatened if a voter photo -ID requirement were put in place in Minnesota. The public is invited to these meetings. For more information contact IwvedinaR- gmail.com or find LWVE on Facebook Susan Howl From: L L ERICKSEN [mailto:emmaiune4@msn.com_1 Sent: Monday, October 31, 20113:52 PM To: James Hovland; Scott Neal; Lynette Biunno Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: RE: Bike Path Proposal - A Resident's Opinion Dear Mayor Hovland, Mr. Neal and City Council, NOV 0 1 2011 Since I have not received any type of acknowledgment, from anyone, I am assuming you did not get my previous email, so I am resending it. I do not expect an "answer" per se, but would like an acknowledgment that my email was received and being considered with the input of other residents. Sincerely yours, Laura * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Laura Ericksen >^..^< EmmaJunWa-_)msn.com From: emmajune4 @msn.com To: jhovland(&cLedina.mn.us; sneaKbci.edina.mn.us; edinamailCabci.edina.mn.us CC: whoule(aDci.edina.mn.us Subject: Bike Path Proposal - A Resident's Opinion Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:13:01 -0500 Dear Mayor Hovland, Mr. Neal and City Council, The proposed bike paths through Edina, may improve our community in many different ways. However, as presented in the preferred proposal at last night's Open House, it will not. I am not opposed to have bike paths through the city, but do not agree with the current preferred proposal of severely limited parking. As a resident on Wooddale Avenue, I am VERY concerned that the favorite proposal removes on- street parking to accommodate bike lanes. On my part of Wooddale built in the early 1950's there are single lane driveways, often accompanied by single car garages and no alleys. On- street parking is the only option if you have more than one guest. My block on the east side has 11 houses, and one block north 12 houses. Folks in the middle will be required to have their guests make quite a hike, in all types of our Minnesota weather. Furthermore, it would not take long to fill up the limited available side street parking. The option to allow us to maintain on- street parking seems to be less acceptable to the city, and it requires a variance. It seems to be ironic that an initiative to make communities "more livable" would do the exact opposite, putting the wishes of the greater metro area above the needs of the local residents. A question that keeps popping into my thoughts, is how many local residents (Edina and SW Minneapolis) would use the bike path versus the number of residents that are hurt by no on- street parking. It seems to me that needs of a minority are being given priority. Given the negative impact on the neighborhood, I am not sure why Mr. Houle and his committee even considered removing parking. It is unacceptable. One of the residents at last night's Open House also brought up an interesting point. What does no on- street parking-do to the value of our property? Wayne Houle did not know. Given the current housing market, no one needs to take a hit in the value of their homes. The speed of the traffic and the volume during peak hours makes the choice of Wooddale Avenue less than desirable from a safety point. I have found it scary just trying to use my driveway in my car during peak times. Fairfax would be a much better and safer choice for bicyclists. At the Open House last night, when I asked about it, Mr. Houle said that it was a less direct route and therefore bikers would most likely not use it and still use Wooddale. I have two points about that comment. First, if bikers will use the most direct route, then why is the bike path not going down France, which is the most direct route? Not that I think that is a good idea, but it follows the logic. Secondly, are we going to allow bikers to do whatever they want ignoring all traffic laws? As an employee at the University of Minnesota, I daily see a majority of bikers of ALL ages totally ignoring traffic laws and creating safety hazards for pedestrians, cars and other bikers. The car traffic laws are routinely ignored in our neighborhood and there is no law enforcement. If you need proof, just watch traffic on the corner of Wooddale and Valley View. To fully support the proposal, I would like to see the bike path moved to Fairfax Avenue, parking on Wooddale maintained and the traffic laws enforced for all in the neighborhood. Sincerely yours, Laura L. Ericksen 6037 Wooddale Avenue South * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Laura Ericksen > ".."< EmmaJune4CaD_msn.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I Susan Howl LEC VE From: L eslie Nicholson [mailto:nicholsonla@msn.com] 2�'� Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:19 PM To: Ed MacHolda Cc: Scott Neal; John Keprios; Lynette Biunno Subject: Edina Aquatic Center Policy (Attn: Ann Swenson) Ed — I have been in contact with Mark Davis, Foxjets Swim Club President, as to the history of the City of Eden Prairie Priority Policy that they had to rework several years ago, as they, too, ran into difficulty with swim clubs and ice skating clubs. They decided that 70% was an appropriate threshold for youth organizations that were based in their city. This took into account that programs like these are not completely community based. Not every city has their own swim team or ice skating team, so residents in cities like Minneapolis, venture out of their borders to find a team to compete with. Unlike the other athletic associations where you can only compete in your city residence, we welcome swimmers ready for competition from all over the metro, as does every other'MN swim club. We maintain approximately 75% of Edina Residents in our club and have 54 years of being proud to call the City of Edina home to our team. We have reviewed the policy you plan to bring to the Park Board and are disappointed that the new changes puts us in the same priority category as a non - resident swim club. We believe as a member of the Edina youth athletic association that we should have priority rental preference to the cities facilities over a non - resident club. We would like to see some changes made to the policy that clearly puts some preference on the fact that we are the Edina Swim Club, have a significant percentage of Edina residents on the team and a very long history of supporting Edina athletics. Please let me know how I can help as this process unfolds — Thanks — Leslie Nicholson Edina Swim Club President a: arki v October 30, 2011 Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West Fifty- Fourth Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1432 Phone: 952.926.3808 - Fax: 952.920.4418 - www.ecic.org Wayne Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works, City Engineer 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Bikeway Dear Mr. Houle, RECEOVED NO � a As leaders of Edina Community Lutheran Church, a community with more than 700 members and over 60 years of ministry on 54th Street, we have followed the plans for the proposed bikeway on 54th Street with both excitement and concern. We are supportive of the city's efforts to promote a variety of transportation options for its residents. ECLC supports improvements that would make biking AND walking safer for people of all ages and abilities. Efforts to slow traffic and make pedestrians safer are especially welcome, since we regularly experience the safety concerns of drivers exceeding the speed limit in front of our building, where both young children and the elderly may be crossing the street to our building. We are deeply concerned, however, about versions of the plan which would eliminate any parking on 54th Street. Currently, fully half of our Sunday morning parking is on- street. Eliminating any parking on 54th street would hamper our ministry and potentially move the congestion to the more residential Halifax Avenue, which already experiences considerable congestion issues due to construction projects. Our need for safe and adequate parking extends far beyond Sunday mornings. Though staff and small groups use our lots during the week, ECLC and community groups that use our facility need on- street parking many nights of the week. In October, for example, we hosted twenty -one non - Sunday events, including AA, Edina Lion's Club, and the Edina Grief Coalition. Most of these events are in late afternoon and evening hours. Our prime building usage is during weekend and commuting hours that would overlap with recreational and commuting cyclists. We hope that the plans will take into account that increased bike traffic creates safety issues of its own when pedestrians and cars share a street with no sidewalks. We hope to be positive partners in this process and will keep our own members informed and engaged as plans move forward. If you could meet with us, we would be happy to talk through possible solutions. Pastor Pam Fickenscher Pastor Erik Strand Kristian Clauser, Business Administrator cc: Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer James Hovland, Mayor "e October 30, 2011 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland and Council Members: OCT 31 2011 We respectfully request that the City of Edina rescind its notice dated October 14, 2011 that purportedly requires us_ to remove approximately 30 trees along Valley View Road at our expense. We are very, very concerned about this, since removing the trees would destroy the sight and sound barrier between our home and Valley View Road. It would also open up our side yard, where neighborhood children play, to the dangers of the adjacent roadway. It will impose on us an expense and, we believe, devalue our property. Finally, although "safety" is the reason stated in the notice, according to the city's police department there have been no traffic incidents in this area at least since 2007 and, according to the City Engineer before this Council last summer, no traffic incidents in this area for over 10 years. We would like to: A) highlight three reasons that the notice should be rescinded; B) note that the trees were first planted at the recommendation of the City; and, C) offer two recommendations to improve safety at the intersection such that removing trees is not necessary The notice should be rescinded for the following three reasons: 1. There is no legal basis for this action demanded in the City's letter Due to our alarm at the notice, we felt we had to retain legal counsel. After a review, they have determined that what the city is attempting to do has no legal basis. The trees are not there in violation of any city code, statute, ordinance, or law. In fact, the notice letter makes no reference to any legal basis for the City's demand to remove the trees at our expense Counsel researched several sections of the City Code and concluded there is no violation. First, City Code1050 addresses Maintenance of Vegetation. Subsection 1050.04 Subdivision 1 Setback states "A restoration area or a planned landscape area must provide the following minimum setbacks: Front Street or Side Street (as measured from the traveled portion of the street) 20 feet... ". However, Subsection 1050.02 Definitions defines Restoration Area as "An area where native grasses and forbs are being or have been intentionally re- established" and defines Planned Landscape Area as "An area where ornamental grasses and groundcovers or native grasses and forbs are planted pursuant to a plan ". The trees in question do not fit these definitions. With respect to this issue we are currently in compliance with the City Code. Second, City Code 1200 addresses Use and Maintenance of Streets, Alleys, Sidewalks, Easements, Parks and other City Owned Property. Subsection 1200.02 Encumbrances or Obstructions states that "Except as provided in Subdivision 2 of this Subsection, no person shall obstruct, encroach upon, encumber, or interfere wholly or partially, with any street, boulevard, alley, sidewalk, easement, park or public ground by placing or installing any of the following:... H. Trees and other plantings which overhang the traveled portion of the streets or sidewalks, provided that no portion of such tree or planting is less than 16 feet above the traveled portion of the street or less than 8 feet above the sidewalk... ". The trees in question do not overhang the traveled portion of Valley View Road nor encroach upon the street; with respect to this issue we are currently in compliance with the City Code. Third, there is only one Section of the City Code that addresses sight lines. City Code 1400 addresses the Clear View Zone. Subsection 1405.02 Obstruction of Clear View Zone states that "No owner of a corner lot shall install, set out, maintain, or permit the installation or maintenance of any sign, hedge, fence, tree, shrub, natural growth, building, structure or other obstruction or any part thereof within the clear view zone except as permitted in Subsection 1405.03 ". The clear view zone is defined in Subsection 1405.01 as the triangular area formed by connecting the following three points: the point of intersection of the curb lines extended of intersecting streets, and a point on each curb line 30 feet from the aforementioned point of intersection. We have retained an independent transportation engineering firm; they have researched this issue and evaluated our corner, and determined that with respect to this issue we are currently in compliance with the City Code. (Interestingly, there was a petition delivered to City Council in September, 2011 that requested the city remove our coniferous hedge. The petition alleged violation of these exact three Sections of the City Code as the reason. However, upon researching these Subsections of the City Code it became apparent that we are in compliance of all of these sections.) Please see the attached October 28, 2011 Sight Line Study from RLK Engineering. We respectfully request that the City consider whether it is fair, on the one hand, to ask a citizen to comply with the City's long ago considered, adopted, and published sight line ordinance, and yet, on the other hand, punish that same citizen for not complying with an unpublished, unconsidered, unadopted and excessive sight line study. It isn't. 2. The majority of the trees were planted there at the City's recommendation. In 1992 the previous owner of our home desired to erect a fence at the edge of the property along Valley View and called the City of Edina planning office for permission. He was informed that fencing regulations would require him to place the fence 30 feet from the road, which would render the yard along Valley View virtually useless. The city planning office suggested that, instead of a fence, he plant a hedge since it could be planted along the road. They suggested the arbor vitae as a good choice because they are fast growing and would rapidly provide privacy, and they suggested he leave some room along the road for snow plow piles in the winter in order to avoid damaging the hedge. He did just as the City of Edina recommended, and the arbor vitae hedge has remained there without eliciting any public comment for the last 19 years. Please see letter dated October 24, 2011 by previous homeowner Tom Bach attached. 3. There is no safety problem to be solved by removing our trees. A memorandum dated September 30, 2011 from WSB & Associates to Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer states in its opening paragraph "We have been requested to review the sight lines at the Valley View Road and Sally Lane intersection. This intersection has been reviewed against current City Codes and has deemed to be consistent with Section 1405 `Clear View Zone'. However, there are safety concerns with sight line at this location that are outside of the City's Clear View Zone requirement." However, nowhere in the City's study of this issue is there any mention of anything but a theoretical safety concern. There is no mention of any accidents, injuries collisions, close calls, or other meaningful indication that there is a realistic safety concern. Their conclusion is that a 293 foot decision sight distance be established along Valley View from the point where a motorist on Sally Lane stops before entering Valley View. Their determination of this distance is based on the MnDOT Road Design Manual (Chapter 2- 5.08.04 Decision Sight Distance), which states that "Decision sight distance is the distance needed for a driver to detect an unexpected or difficult -to- perceive condition, recognize the condition and its potential threat, select an appropriate speed and path, and perform the maneuver safely and efficiently." The distance is calculated by using 10 seconds as a guideline as the amount of time needed for the four actions described above (detection, recognition, selection, maneuver). They calculate that 10 seconds of travel time along Valley View at 20 mph equates to 293 feet. Establishing 293 feet (almost a full football field) of sight distance would require us to remove our approximately 30 trees. It is this conclusion that led to the staff recommendation to City Council that the trees need to be removed (at our expense) and is the apparent basis of the notice we received from the City on October 14, 2011. We ask you to just think about this for a minute. The concept described above includes four actions (detection, recognition, selection, and maneuver). A motorist stopped at the white stop bar on Sally Lane does not need time. for all four of these actions. They simply need to determine if another vehicle is coming along Valley View and, if not, enter the roadway. That does not take 10 seconds. I have observed hundreds of vehicles approaching the intersection, taking no more than a few seconds to stop and enter Valley View. For this, even five seconds is plenty of time. Indeed, the MnDOT Road Design Manual indicates that "Use of values more or less than 10 seconds may be judged appropriate as circumstances dictate." Try it for yourself! You simply will not need very much time. Using the WSB calculation methodology, five seconds equates to 146.5 feet and there is currently this distance of clear view down Valley View such that no action needs to be taken with respect to tree removal nor trimming. If there was a sight line problem at this intersection, there presumably would be a history of accidents. However, when our legal counsel researched 'this with the City of Edina Police Department, they were informed that there have been no recorded accidents at this location since 2007, the earliest date records are easily available according to the department. While we feel that intuitively there is adequate sight line distance at the intersection such that no action against our trees needs to be taken, we felt it worthwhile to seek the judgment of a professional traffic engineering firm (a second opinion from that of WSB & Associates). We contacted a leading firm in this area, SRF Consulting, but they indicated they do not take assignments this small and suggested RLK Incorporated, whom we contacted. RLK Incorporated conducted a Sight Line Study, at our expense (please see their report attached). RLK first notes that the Road Design Manual (relied upon by the City in its notice to us) stipulates that "Use of values more or less than 10 seconds may be judged appropriate as circumstances dictate ", and note that the Highway Capacity Manual defaults to a 6.5 second guideline (we note that using the WSB calculation methodology, this would equate to 191 feet). RLK also went on to review traffic engineering standards and manuals to determine the adequate application of sight line distance standards and guidelines in this situation. The firm concludes "To that end, we would state that it is our professional engineering judgment that the ten - second decision time quoted by WSB in their report to the City of Edina is excessive in this situation. Furthermore, we believe that an unsubstantiated safety concern was used to recommend the removal of the planting/vegetation and trees along this frontage of Valley View Road ". RLK's review also determined that "The MnDOT Road Design Manual states that roadway design speed of 30 mph yields a stopping sight distance of 200 feet ". (Interestingly, this is very close to the 191 feet that using the WSB methodology for 6.5 seconds would yield.) Finally, RLK suggests two actions to improve safety at the intersection without removing any trees. We offer two recommendations to improve safety at the intersection without removing any trees. 1. We trim back two fir trees. The RLK Sight Line Study recommends that "While the 200' stopping sight distance is met, it can be improved by the trimming back of the two large fir trees 50 - 75 feet east of Sally Lane ". We would like to note that these trees are not interfering with the sight line established in the RLK -report (nor are they violating the City's own code regarding sight lines), but we would be willing to trim them back on our own in order to improve the sight line further. We would also like to note that these two trees are not the two trees that have already been trimmed back next to the Clear View Zone. 2. The City of Edina install a Side Street 90 Degree (W2 -2) sign. The RLK report references the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (the "MnMUTCD "), which provides direction on when warning signs can and shall be used. Regarding the placement of warning signs, the manual states that these sighs should be placed in relation to the "PIEV' time --.that is total time needed to perceive and complete a reaction to a sign that is the sum of : the times necessary for Perception, Identification, Emotion (decision making), and Volition (execution of. decision): This time can vary from several seconds to 6 seconds or more for warning signs requiring high road user judgment. In this case, the MnMUTCD . states that a Side -Road 90 Degree sign (W2 -2) may be used in advance of an intersection to indicate the presence of an intersection and the possibility of turning or entering traffic. RLK suggests that safety can be improved further by the placement of this sign approximately 175 feet from the intersection (at. the property line) for the westbound approach, and that this is a "more practical (and less invasive) solution to this situation than is the removal of several trees and vegetation in this area ". We appreciate your consideration of the above rationale for rescinding the notice to remove our trees, and request that you consider the two recommended actions that will serve to improve safety without destroying any trees. If the City desires to take any action with respect to this situ_ ation, please contact us so that we can discuss it. Respectfully, W Douglas W. Benner 7025 Sally Lane Edina, MN 55439 952 -829 -5443 Jill D. Benner Attachments: Notice from the City of Edina, Tom Bach Letter, RLK Sight Line Study October 14, 2011 Mr. Douglas and Mrs. Jill Benner 7025 Sally Lane Edina, MN 55439 RE: Vegetation within Right -of. -.Way Dear Mr. and Mrs. Benner: City of Edina At the October 4 City Council meeting, the City Council approved staff's recommendation to remove vegetation from the roadway right -of -way that is adjacent to your property. Please see attached drawing which indicates what vegetation needs to be removed. This letter serves as official notice that this vegetation needs to be removed by November 14, per staff's recommendation to the City Council: Staff would suggest that the vegetation be removed within 30 -days of notice from City staff. If the vegetation is not removed within the 30 -days staff will then remove the vegetation and invoice the property owner for the cost. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at whoule @ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosure C: Scott Neal, City Manager - City of Edina G: \Pw \ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \S Streets \Sally Lane Vegetation Issue \20111014 wH to 7025 Sally Lane RE Vegitation.doc City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 October 24, 2011 RE: Trees planted at 7025 Sally Lane, Edina, MN This is background to the row of trees planted on the Valley View Road side of the lot located at 7025 Sally Lane. My wife and I purchased that property in May, 1991. It was our first home. At the time there were a few straggly bushes growing along Valley View Road. In order to provide some level of privacy from the traffic on Valley View Road, and some level of protection /safety, I investigated installing a fence along Valley View Road. 1 called the City of Edina planning office in winter of 1992. A woman in the planning office explained the fencing regulations, which would have required me to place the fence approximately 30' back (as I recall) from the road. This would have rendered the side yard virtually useless to us as the majority of the yard would be on the road side of the fence. The city planner suggested instead that we plant a row of arbor vitae bushes along the road. She suggested these bushes because they are fast growing (approximately 1' per year) and would rapidly provide privacy. She pointed out that they would be a pleasant "fence line ", and that for setback we could plant them close to the road so we could make use of our side yard (which we did in the form of a volleyball and badminton court area). She said the main consideration for setback would be to leave enough room for snow plow snow piles so that the snow would not damage the hedge. She also gave me instructions on how to prune and maintain the hedge. She was extremely helpful! As a result of that conversation, my wife and I planted the approximately 20 arbor vitae bushes along Valley View Road. They have become a beautiful privacy hedge over the past 20 years! I hope this background is useful. Please contact me if you need additional information. l Tom Bach H (952) 943 -2102 C (612) 578 -5274 /00�\ Engineering • Landscape Architecture • Planning • Surveying • Traffic �J MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Doug Benner and Ms. Jill Benner FROM: Steve Manhart, P.E., PTOE, PTP Vernon Swing, P.E. DATE: October 28, 2011 RE: Sight Line Study 7025 Sally Lane, Edina, MN 55439 RLK Project No. 2011 -19X -M Creating extraordinary Communities smanhart@rlkinc.com vswing@rlkinc.com Per your request, RLK Incorporated has completed our review of a sight line report prepared for the City of Edina regarding the intersection of Valley View Road and Sally Lane. This review prepared by WSB & Associates, has identified potential sight line problems for traffic at the southbound approach to Valley View Road. As a result, the WSB report recommends the removal of several trees and vegetation along the Valley View Road frontage to this property. In response, you have requested RLK to verify these findings and recommendations, and if necessary, make alternate recommendations for sight line improvements. At the onset of our review, we have looked at the existing Section 1405 of the City of Edina City Code that defines Clear View Zones. According to the Code, the Clear View Zone is defined as, "The triangular area formed by connecting the following three points: the point of intersection of the curb lines extended of intersecting streets, and a point on each curb line 30 feet from the aforementioned point of intersection. If there are no curbs, the edge of the traveled portion of the street shall be used instead of the curb line. "' We have identified the Clear View Zones that exists at the intersection of Valley View Road and Sally Road (See Figure 1). Using these parameters, we conclude that the intersection Clear Zones are adequately clear of trees and vegetation in keeping with the letter of the ordinance. (Note that the WSB report has deemed that this intersection was consistent with Section 1405 as well.) Nevertheless, the City has pursued a review of sight lines throughout Edina. In the WSB Memorandum dated 10/30/ 2011, "...there are safety concerns with sight line at this location that are outside of the ' Section 1405.01 Clear View Zone Defined, City Code, City of Edina, Ord 1402 codified 1970; amended by Ord 1995 -6 8- 17 -95., hgp:// www .ci.edina.mn.us /cilycode/L5 -01 CityCodeSectl405.htm Offices: Duluth • Ham Lake • Hibbing • Minnetonka • Oakdale (952) 933 -0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive - Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (952) 933 -1153 Equal Opportunity Employer City's Clear View Zone requirement." With that, WSB conducted an in -depth analysis of Decision Sight Distance, as defined by the Minnesota Road Design Manual. The WSB study quotes the Mn/DOT manual as defining a decision time of 10 seconds as adequate for most practical purposes. The Road Design Manual states that, "Use of values more than or less than 10 seconds may be judged appropriate as circumstances dictate. "Z The manual goes on to say, "In cases where providing 10- second decision sight distance is desired but not practical, special geometric, signing and/or delineation measures should be considered to aid drivers' perception and decision making.3 In fact, the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual defaults to 6 -1/2 seconds for driver gap acceptance, significantly less than 10 seconds. The WSB report concludes that a sight line of 293 feet is required for a 20 mph approach vehicle from the east. Thus, it was recommended that "all of the planting in the right -of -way from Sally Lane to the 7146 property be removed, including the trees along the 7025 property." RLK Incorporated has been on -site and has reviewed the traffic and sight distance conditions at the intersection. Field observations indicated that gaps in excess of 6 -1/2 seconds are common. We noted that the stop bar has been located far forward so as to allow maximum sight distance to the east (See Exhibit 1). We noted the line of trees and vegetation that exist along the property south frontage. We have also looked at the sight lines for traffic at Sally Lane attempting to see traffic approaching the intersection. We also have reviewed the additional information that you have provided, as well as traffic engineering standards and manuals to determine the adequate application of sight distance standards and guidelines in this situation. Exhibit 1. Southbound Approach to Valley View Road along Sally Lane Z Road Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN, July 2007, page 2- 5(17). 3 Ibid. FIX Incorporated Page 2 of 4 October 28, 2011 Rght Line Review —7025 Sally Ln., Una, MN 2011 -19X -M To that end, we would state that it is our professional engineering judgment that the ten - second decision time quoted by WSB in their report to the City of Edina is excessive in this situation. Furthermore, we believe that an unsubstantiated safety concern was used to recommend the removal of the planting/vegetation and trees along this frontage of Valley View Road. Our review of the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual shows that, "Stopping sight distance represents a near worst -case situation.s4 It is our opinion that the onus of safety is on the Valley View driver as well as the driver turning from Sally Lane. While we agree that the driver from Sally Lane is "deciding" whether to enter the gap in the traffic along Valley View Road, the driver approaching Sally Lane along Valley View must have a sight line sufficient to stop. The Mn/DOT Road Design Manual states that a roadway design speed of 30 mph yields a stopping sight distance of 200 feet (See Figure 2). Therefore, the westbound driver along Valley View Road must have an awareness of the approaching intersection at Sally Lane. This is a situation where signing the presence of a T- intersection may provide drivers with adequate warning without the need to completely remove all plantings and trees along this frontage. To that end, the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) provides direction on when warning signs can and shall be used. Regarding the placement of warning signs the manual states these signs should be placed in relation to the "PIEV" time -- that is, the total time needed to perceive and complete a reaction to a sign is the sum of the times necessary for Perception, Identification (understanding), Emotion (decision making), and Volition (execution of decision).5 The MnMUTCD states that "the PIEV time can vary from several seconds for general warning signs to 6 seconds or more for warning signs requiring high road user judgment ".6 This varies significantly from the 10 seconds quoted by the WSB engineer. In this case, the MnMUTCD states that a Side Road 90 Degree sign (W2 -2) "may be used in advance of an intersection to indicate the presence of an intersection and the possibility of turning or entering traffic ".7 The installation of a W2 -2 sign (see Exhibit 2) approximately 175 feet from the intersection (at the property line) for the westbound approach to this intersection is a more practical (and less evasive) solution to this situation than is the removal of several trees and vegetation in this area. r Exhibit 2. MnMUTCD W2 -2 Sign — Side Street 90 Degrees 4 Road Design Manual, page 2- 5(12). 5 Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN, May 2005, page 2C -3. 6 Ibid. 7 MnMUTCD, page, 2C -20. RLKlncorporated Page 3 of 4 October 28, 2011 9ght Line Review —7025 Sally Ln., Edina, MN 2011 -19X -M Safety has been cited as a rationale used to support the decision sight distance concern. The Mn/DOT Road Design Manual states, "It is also beneficial to review the accident history and prepare a collision diagram while redesigning an intersection. Accident history is often the most accurate predictor of future accidents, and an analysis can offer valuable insights into any safety problems that may exist. "8 Therefore, RLK Incorporated investigated intersection crash history. According to statements made by the Edina City Engineer at a public meeting, there have not been any crashes at the intersection of Valley View and Sally in at least ten years.9 If sight distance were truly a safety concern, there would be a high incidence of right -angle crashes at the intersection. It is our contention that, while the identification of potential safety problems is important, the relatively low speed (posted 30 mph) and the single lane approach of westbound traffic does not warrant additional sight line exposure approaching Sally Lane. In conclusion, RLK Incorporated finds that the use of decision sight distance to determine adequate sight lines is excessive and not in keeping with other traffic engineering design principles. The rationale of safety as an aspect in determining adequate traffic control should be founded in crash data as well as sight distance calculations. While decision sight distance would affect the driver turning onto Valley View Road, the awareness of the approaching intersection is equally important for the westbound driver. Situational awareness can be improved for the westbound driver by the installation of a Side Street 90 Degree Sign (W2 -2). As a result, the stopping sight distance for the Valley View driver becomes as important, if not more important than the decision sight distance for the Sally Lane driver. While the 200' stopping sight distance is met, it can be improved by the trimming back of the two large fir trees 50 -75 feet east of Sally Lane. Our recommended actions appear on Figure 3. They remain significantly less severe to the trees and vegetation along Valley View Road, but will provide improved awareness of the Sally Lane intersection. CADocuments and Settings\Admin\Desktop \Valley View & Sally\MEMORANDUM.doc 8 Mn/DOT Road Design Manual, page 5 -1(1). 9 As reported by Doug and Jill Benner, residents of 7025 Sally Lane, Edina, MN. RLKlncorporated Page 4 of 4 October 28, 2011 Sight Line Review —7025 Sally Ln., Edina, MN 2011 -19X -M Section 1405 — pear Vier Zone 1 05.01 ;'pear View Zone Defined The trfangulw area b the fogowhg three ports the pout Of the curb IhM extended of intersecting point on each curb line 30 feet from the d point of Intersection. if there w no .. 1 the edge tr ll avded portion of the street sha be used y 140502 Obstruction of sear View Zone. No owner of a comer lot shall hatdL set out. maintain. or permit the „* hstailotlon or malntsnauce of any sign, hedge„ fence. ' �~ tree„ shrub,' natural growth. building, structure or other r ' r any part thereof within the dew New zanily exceptoproMed in Subsection 1405.03 -- City. of Edina City Code i CLEAR ZONE14 A ti CLEAR ZONE', r° -�` VIP `y k'v 3p� f t ;j 0 50 r• v yC� y _ x SCALE IN FEET IAMW W1-- Section 1405 — Clear View Zone 1405.01 spear Vim Zone Defined The triangular area r by connecting the following three points: the of. , tereectlon of the curb limes adended of Intersecting t +a- and a point on each curb An* 30 het from the flared point of Inhrsectlon. If them are no 0 curbs, the edge of the traveled potion of the street shall be used Irmtsod of the curb Ilse. ,S 1403.02 Obstruction of pear View Zone. No owner of a oamr lot shall install, set out. maintain. or permit the .Intiallatlon .or maintenance of any sign. hedge, fence, # trv%, shrub. natural v owil binding, structure or other obstruction or any part thereof within the deer view zone, + expept a# provkl d In Subsection 1403.03. -- City, of, Edna City code . 4 Y VEHICLE AT STOP BAR e,tr ,..a —"' n +' <r _ VEHICLE APPROACHING •` �";; f {. r 9! - 200' STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE to A' x Duluth, MN figure hlam lakc MN Valley View Road and Sally Lane 3 ~ ItLK Hibbing, MN Minnaonka, MN OaW k: MN yj INCOItI'C�W \'1'LU Phone: 952 933 0972 Date V F..:95529331153 PROK 'D MODIFICATIONS /27/11 � . lkinccom 0 6110 Bluc Circic Dri\ c 100 • Mi —m.ka, MN 55343 October 27, 2011 Proposed France Avenue Bridge In May 2011, the City Council directed the ETC to look holistically at France Avenue from TH 62 to 494. As part of this review the ETC discussed the proposed 72"d Street Pedestrian Bridge over France Avenue and at grade improvements (crossings, sidewalks, transit stops) along the corridor. Materials reviewed include: • 2009 France Avenue Corridor Study • 2007 Submittal For Federal Transportation Enhancement Funding: 72nd Street Pedestrian Bridge • 2006 Promenade study and concept plan Discussions have spanned several meetings. During these meetings, and in follow up emails and conversations with engineering staff, many questions about the proposed bridge were asked that remain unanswered. Some of these questions have been asked multiple times over the span of several months. A written record of these questions from my emails is attached; an additional record may be found in ETC minutes. Despite having unanswered questions, the ETC felt confident enough in our investigation and understanding of our City's transportation goals to vote in two separate meetings to recommend to the City Council that the City pursue at grade pedestrian improvements along the France Avenue corridor and that the City not pursue the proposed pedestrian bridge. June 16, 2011 Motion by Commissioner Nelson to not support the bridge at the current location and to support significant enhancement improvements to facilitate at -grade crossing and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bass. July 21, 2011 Motion was made by Member Bonneville and seconded by Member Nelson that the ETC reiterate their prior recommendation that the bridge not be built for lack of information and high cost; lack of public input; not knowing connectivity; will not serve users on France Avenue; lack of justification; not warranted for usage; and not judicious, efficient use of public dollars. A review of the public record related to the proposed bridge raises some important points: The bridge will not connect to the 9MC regional trail, as the attached map shows. The Council approved an alignment for the trail in December 2010. This alignment includes an at grade crossing of France Avenue at Gallagher. This alignment was approved by the 3RPD board in March 2011. Any future connection of the proposed bridge to the trail would be at additional (most likely City) expense and involve easements or redevelopment of commercial properties. 2. Staff has estimated that the cost of the bridge will be $3 -5 million (see ETC minutes, June 16, 2011). The attached generic cost estimating tool for pedestrian improvements shows that pedestrian bridges range from $500,000 -$4 million and up, depending on "size and approach of crossing," plus mobilization, contingency and design costs. 3. Pedestrian bridges can be needed in locations where there is no option to cross at grade —over a highway or river for example. France Avenue provides many opportunities to cross at grade, making a bridge unnecessary. These crossings can be enhanced to further improve actual and perceived safety without compromising motor vehicle operations. The attached "Pedestrian Bridges: What Works; What Doesn't" gives a quick overview of when a pedestrian bridge may be needed, and when it is not. 4. Every single source I have consulted has stated that people tend not to use pedestrian bridges when using the bridge will add to crossing time or is perceived to be inconvenient and when there is an at grade alternative. The above mentioned cost estimating tool gives pedestrian bridges the lowest cost /benefit score when compared to sidewalks, pedestrian signals, and other essential pedestrian improvements. The attached figure from p. 45 of "Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines for Texas" shows approximately 70% of people will use a pedestrian bridge when crossing time is roughly equal when compared to crossing at grade. The number goes down to less than 5% when there is just a 50% increase in crossing time. In other words, if it would take two minutes to cross at grade, but 3 minutes to cross using the bridge, 95% of pedestrians will cross at grade. This lack of use is also observed locally, as recorded in TLC and City of Minneapolis bicycle and pedestrian counts. The highest bicycle counts have.been observed on the Sabo Bridge, which is connected to a busy trail. Even so, it is noted people still cross at grade, as the below excerpt from an email from a TLC employee shows: As far as a pedestrian overpasses go, what we generally find is that people will still cross at grade unless: 1) There is a time savings by using a bridge; 2) The at -grade crossing is prohibited; 3) People are prevented from crossing at grade via a fence or other obstruction. Even with the beautiful Sabo bridge we find that it is mostly used by recreational cyclists. Commuting cyclists and pedestrians tend to be taking the more direct route and crossing at grade even though they may have to wait a full two minutes before they have a walk signal. (And thank goodness that signal has not been removed — as some had advocated in order to force more people to take the longer route). One problem with bridges is that they require more physical work /exertion. Not an issue for recreational cyclists who are mostly interested in exercise but definitely an issue for pedestrians — especially people with disabilities or the elderly who already may find walking an arduous activity. 5. There are currently signalized crossings less than ' /z mile apart, at W. 70`s and at Gallagher. Improvements to these crossings would provide the same benefits as intended to be gained from the pedestrian bridge, at significantly lower expense. It is approximately one -tenth of a mile from the signalized crossing at Gallagher and the proposed bridge. It is approximately three- tenths of a mile from the signalized crossings at W. 70th and the proposed bridge. 6. Public support for the pedestrian bridge over France has not been adequately assessed. Sixteen residents signed a letter of support for the funding application in 2007. During the W. 70th study, one resident, via comment card, expressed a need for underpasses or overpasses to access the Southdale area. Yet, engineering staff has represented public support for the bridge as "very strong." 7. Business support for the proposed bridge has also been stated; however, other than one 2007 letter from a property owner representative (Cyprus Equities) this support has not been substantiated. A record of the support has been requested. 8. Similarly, a record of communication with Hennepin County about the project has been requested and, as of this writing, has not been provided. It remains unknown whether the county would support the project. 9. Although it has been stated that Housing and Redevelopment Authority funds (TIF) would pay for an engineering study for the bridge and for the bridge construction, there appears to be no record of an HRA discussion of this project or authorization to spend these funds. Although the funding application stated the bridge appeared in the 2008 -2012 CIP it did not. 10. A great deal has changed since 2006 when the concept for this bridge was first presented. a. We now know that the regional trail will cross France at Gallagher and that it will not link to the proposed bridge without additional expense and land acquisition and /or redevelopment. b. More recent studies —the 2009 France Avenue Corridor Study and 2009 Metro Transit Access to Transit Study — recommend at grade crossings on France Avenue. c. MnDOT and Hennepin County have adopted complete streets policies. The 2009 France Avenue Corridor Study was funded by Hennepin County and provides a complete streets concept for the corridor to meet transportation needs and stimulate housing, employment and economic development in the Southdale area. A bridge is not included with the recommendations. d. The City Council has adopted active living, GreenSteps, and Living Streets initiatives that support approaching France Avenue from a complete streets perspective. e. W. 70th is now complete and, with its improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities, provides an obvious location for enhanced at grade crossings. f. The Promenade has been more expensive than anticipated and is not yet complete. The bridge was originally proposed to cost just over $2 million. More recent estimates, as said above, are $3 -5 million and up. g. The City is engaged in new discussions about economic development in the . . . . . Southdale area and considering creating a dedicated source of funding for - pedestrian and bicycling transportation improvements. In other words, Edina has moved forward in the past five years. The rationale for the bridge was stated in the funding application to be to "provide a safe and efficient connection between the commercial, retail, and offices located east of France Avenue and the residential neighborhoods west of France Avenue." This same goal can be achieved at grade —not in one location (like the bridge) but in multiple locations along the corridor. At the same time, missing sidewalk segments can be constructed and transit stops can be improved. The result will be a France Avenue that is no longer a barrier to pedestrians and bicyclists, but a roadway that functions safely and Iefficiently for every user. Please note the above expresses my personal views and the information is accurate to the best of my knowledge. I have shared this memo with ETC members but, in consideration of the open meeting law, have not invited their comments or signatures. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this information. Please contact me if you have any questions. I look forward to your discussion on November 1. Sincerely, Jennifer Janovy Edina r ' . i � re yrrly - i;� *� �Cat!rc ^00 IL a _ 11#72n��.. idl +'yam i 6;'E!, ,�Y #. � " 1 `• - r : • �j ♦ � :.1 • b r• fA'A�i15,11, C i w ri masters Li Ailiinct!" C.-� r R F vial � �,,. � .� ,�. 4 A • ,y �> > Furniture in i .. � �- Cr�ru►!;elpt !tl «�':� :� Gallery -.� i ��, 'r. Rra}ty Can v, BlacAn:.g h e 7 ..-p. -« 54 am* r .� .°"-r° •a`��L� J` i'�`tlaterlalti 9'U'� s w lr ..rWam* fe ebb r ! Patt�e}ry t r F' y.1 Sandwich S � .. p fOnl � •.. ia I , °_ T�•+ r • '}' J. 1 •1 FNf' • all ' .r >� Bl1� @r�. T if . . and tles D CeUurar r ' 4 GENERIC COST ESTIMATING TOOL Table 4-1 presents a generic cost estimating tools that can serve as a concep- tual planning tool for local jurisdictions to estimate the costs of pedestrian improvements. The generic template is designed to be interactive; cities and counties can use the Excel spreadsheet to input local information about quan- tities of desired facilities and get a ballpark budget for a set of pedestrian im- provements. The template is a menu of commonly uses items and their ap- proximate costs; final cost estimates for real capital projects should be pre- pared by trained engineers. It is also important to note that there may be economies of scale achieved when installing multiple pedestrian improve- ments at one time. The template does not reflect these savings. A description of each column contained in Table 4-1, the cost estimating tool, is below. A. Item Description The pedestrian facilities are listed alphabetically in the description column. They are divided into two categories: pedestrian infrastructure and pedestrian amenities. Items in the infrastructure section include the core facilities, or "building blocks" of a safe and healthy pedestrian district. This category in- cludes sidewalks, crosswalks, roadway medians, traffic signals and bulb -outs. Facilities in the pedestrian amenities section include items that improve the overall comfort and appearance of the pedestrian environment. Examples of amenities include benches, trees and street pole banners. While it is beyond the scope of this project to prepare a detailed description of each pedestrian facility listed in the template, many resources exist that describe these items, including MTC's Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Toolbox, many local pedes- trian plans and websites such as walkinginfo.org. B. Quantity and Unit These columns allow the user to input a number of units of a specific facility to generate a total cost. The unit choices are: 4 -1 M E T R O P O L I T A N TRANSPORTATION C O M M I S S I O N PEDESTRIAN DISTRICTS STUDY GENERIC COST ESTIMATING TOOL ♦ Square Feet (SF) for items that cover a large area such as concrete paving for sidewalks or asphalt. ♦ Linear Foot (LF) for facilities that need to be measured in a line rather than by total area. A linear foot measurement would apply to curb and gutter, a roadway median or seat walls. ♦ Each (EA) for items where there is an individual cost per item but there may be many of one item needed, such as signs, traffic circles, wheelchair ramps or amenities such as benches, bike racks and information kiosks. ♦ Lump Sum (LS) for items where one lump sum applies to the entire cost of implementing or constructing the item, such as the required 60 -day maintenance for new trees. C. Low and High Unit Costs The next two columns provide 2005 high and low costs for each item on the template. The range allows for variances in the quality and brand of an item. The low cost typically applies to a "no- frills" version of an item. The high cost applies to items that often require some amount of original design, such as gateway features or a pedestrian bridge. These types of items typically have the biggest range in costs, as do traffic signals, which can vary greatly in their size, capabilities and structural integrity. The range in price also ensures that the template will be used for conceptual budgeting only and not exact pricing of real capital projects. In some cases the'cost is the same in the high and low column because no range in price (or in quality) exists for the item. All costs assume demolition (if necessary) and installation costs. The costs contained in the template are based on DC &E's own design and cost estimating work for streetscape projects throughout the Bay Area, which is informed by the RS Means Site Work and Landscape Cost Data. The cost estimates were also cross- referenced with costs contained in MTC's Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Toolbox and with individual cities, including the City of Oakland. In addition, before the total cost is calculated on the last page, the 4 -2 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION C O M M I S S I O N PEDESTRIAN DISTRICTS STUDY GENERIC COST ESTIMATING TOOL template adds a 10 percent mobilization fee, a 20 percent contingency fee and a 15 percent planning and design fee, which are all based on industry stan- dards. The next two columns, Low Price and High Price, merely calculate a total cost for the items based on the unit count inputted into the template. D. High and Low Cost Subtotals These columns provide separate subtotals for the pedestrian infrastructure costs and the pedestrian amenities costs. E. Effectiveness This column provides a normative assessment of the effectiveness of each pe- destrian facility on a high /medium /low scale. The rating is inherently quali- tative. A high effective rating means that the facility has strong value related to safety, access, aesthetics and cost. The facility promotes walkability, in- duces people to walk, improves safety or creates an attractive pedestrian envi- ronment. A highly effective facility achieves these things in the most cost effective way possible. Core pedestrian infrastructure such as sidewalks, traf- fic signals, and pedestrian lights are all considered "high." The effectiveness of other facilities are considered relative to these essential items. A limitation of the template is that it does not capture the idea that the effec- tiveness of an individual facility is typically greater when it is installed in combination with other pedestrian improvements. For example, a crosswalk is,made more effective when it is implemented with stop back lines and stop signs to ensure that vehicles come to a stop. Similarly, stop signs are more effective when they abut a stop back line and a crosswalk because then the driver anticipates the pedestrians. In addition, it is important to note that other elements in the built environment, such as the mix of land uses, residen- tial densities, and transit access are just as important in creating good pedes- 4 -3 M E T R O P O L I T A N TRANSPORTATION C O M M I S S I O N PEDESTRIAN DISTRICTS STUDY GENERIC COST ESTIMATING TOOL trian environment as the pedestrian facilities included in the cost estimate template. F. Notes and Assumptions This column includes any notes or assumptions necessary to help explain or clarify the cost estimate for an individual item. 4 -4 Table 4-1: COST ESTIMATING TEMPLATE For Planning Purposes Only Iltem IDescrlptlon I Uty IUnitl UnR $I Hlghl Low) High l Lo-1 H19h1 Unh S Pri Price Subtotal Subtotal EHeclltreness Notes & Assumptions'' Pedestrian Infi2itr6d um. .1 !k _ So , _ '$o Cr omn 1.0 Audible Pedestrian Crossing Curs at intersection LS $10AW $10.400 SO $0 a Per intersection. Assumes one at each comer of intersection (8 per intersection or $10:400 r intersection) I .I Automatic Pedestrian Detection EA $500 $l 000 50 So _ - - - --- ,- - - -. - -_ ' 2.0 e A surface treatement that senses the weight of pedestrian 12 Bulbous curb, sf Concrete, wheelchair access. demo) $1920 EA $15000.00 $25,000.00 $0 So includes irrigation. trenching and water barrier 2.1 0 Costs increases with infrastructure implications. Based on Jura sum cost for 6' wide bulboul extension, and 20' ten h 13 Crosswnik Countdowns SOW LS $2,400 $6.400 $0 $0 Estimate based on square, footage of landscape am and tree maintenance of costs over 112 mile of road 22 2.3 0 Per intersection assumes 8 signals). Cost is $300 - $800 for one countdown signal I A Crosswalk: Lighted Flashing (In Pavement Flashers) $3000 51200 LS 5100000 5120DW so SO Includs installation 2.4 a Lights adhered to pavement in crosswalk. Per interesection. 15 Crosswalk: Raised above grade $750 EA $5.000 $5000 $0 So 2.5 e 1.6 Crosswalk: Striping (Standard and High Visibility) 510000 LF $3 $6 $0 $01 a Low end: standard and zebra stripping: High end: high visibility 0oursescent 1.7 Pedestrian Push Button Treatments EA $1300 $130(1 $0 $0 e 1.8 Pedestrian Refugc Island EA $8000 515000 $0 5o a Ascumcs curb and mcdian approxinuncly 6' wide 1.9 Si na a (Standard vs. High Visibility) EA 1 $300 $400 $0 $0 0 Assumes new post is needed in sidewalk and installation 1.10 Si slued Intcreactions LS $125000 52509M So SO 0 Per intersection. Estimate depends on sire orstrect, t orxi not and complexity of intersection 1.11 Wheelchair Ramps (w/ warning surface half domes EA $2,600 $3.100 SO $o 0 Includes demolition costs and repaving asphalt at cuts 1.12 Ycld Lines (Advanced Limit Lines or Back Lines LS $200 $500 50 $0 0 Per ntcrsec ion Enforcement 1.13 1 Radar Speed Display Sin FA 513000 $160 $01 SO 1.14 lRatBox LS 5400 $400 $01 Sol I I jPer interacctioo. Rat box indicates when signal has changed. Requires 4 per intersection(or $100 each) 1.15 ITrafficCamems LS $75.0(10 5125000 $01 Sol I Infrared cameras that photograph autos running redli his. Pcr intersection. Materials 1.16 A.c halticCon mSc SF $9 $9 $0 $0 Roadway asphalt 1.17 Concrete Pavin Sidewalk (scared) I SF I S81 S101 SO $0 S uam foot cost of concrete for interior of sidewalk only Sidewalks and Lighting 1.18 Concmic Curb and Gutter installation LF $30 $40 $0 $0 0 1.19 Concrete Curb and Gutter Remove and Replace LF $60 $60 $0 s0 0 120 Concrete Sidewalks Removal and Replacement SF $20 $20 $0 50 Is Crosswalk includes concrete treatment 1.21 Pedestrian Leyel Street Lights EA S3AOO $5,000 $0 s0 1.22 Standard Street Light (Cobra Head) PA $10000 $IBM $0 $0 1.23 Widened Sidewalks LP $80 $80 $0 $0 0 Includes demolition cost for curb removal, replacement and concrete for 3 SF of sidewalk TraIDc Calming 1.24 lChicancs IS S150MI 5350110 $0 $0 A significantly berated median between two lanes of traffic 1.25 ISpeedburnpi EA S3X0j 54500 $0 $0 0 126 lStopSigns I EA 1 $3110 $300 $0 $0 a lincluding new past and cast of installntion 1.27 lTraffic Calming Circles I FA I S80MI 512000 $0 SO Small circle barrier in typical intersection and lindscaped ., Pedestrian`Amenllks, - �_ ' ,: -_ -..i ! --- �f- ! _ ..- -. j0 : _ I _ - - - --- ,- - - -. - -_ ' 2.0 24• Box Trees EA I 51920 $1920 $0 50 includes irrigation. trenching and water barrier 2.1 60 Day Meinteaance SOW $0 $0 a Estimate based on square, footage of landscape am and tree maintenance of costs over 112 mile of road 22 2.3 Bench (6' Wide) Bike Rocks VPAS60:0 $3000 51200 50 $0 so $0 e a Includs installation 2.4 Bollards $750 $0 $0 e 2.5 Bus Shcllcr 510000 SO SO I Cost PsUrnstas based on 2105 prices. 2 All Items listed Include instaoaton cases. Sr; Squaw Foot LS: Lump Sum EA: Each LF: Linear Foot For more L forination rat facilities mid costs, see MTC's Pedestrian and Birycle Ta Ikft at Iv7p:/ hwivitacca. gov/ plaimurglbicyc lespedestrianslindexJttm High e Medium Low i a ,jle 4-1: COST ESTIMATING TEMPLATE For Planning Purposes Only Low Hlgh Low High Low High Item Desert on D Unit Unit $ Unh S Prl Pric Subtotal Subtotal Effectiveness Notes & Assum onsr' n AmexdHes- alt . - Pedestria W - ; - - - - .. _ _ _ .- --- _ _ -.. _, - .� .._ - - -•.:, _ - — 2.6 Bus Concrete Pad I EA 1 $6,500 S6.5001 $0 $0 2.7 Crosswalk: Permeable Paving- Brick SF 1 $13 $13 $0 s0 Includes demo of existing asphaltic concrete and aggregate base 2.8 Crosswalk. Scored Concrete SF $8 S12 $0 so Includes demo of existing asphaltic concrete and aggregate base 2.9 Crosswalk: Starnpcd Colored Concrete SF $10 $15 $o $0 Include., demo of existing asphaltic concrete and aggregate base 2.10 Gateway Features BA 512.000 524000 $0 $0 2.11 Grade Separated Cm. in (Pedestrian Bride ) EA S500p00 S41MMO $0 $0 0 Casts increases with size and approach of crossing 2.12 lInformation Kiosks EA 51500 $30W so $0 e 2.13 ItAndscaped Median LF $200 $400 $0 $0 e 2.14 Newsmcks EA $4,0(10 $6DW s0 s0 Includes a bank of" newspaper rocks. 2.15 Oran c Safer Fla at Comer Intersections EA $ 100 $ 100 $0 so Per set for one side of street; 8 sets required for complete set. 2.16 Planting at Bulb -outs SF $9 $9 $0 $0 e 2.17 Scat Wall LF $185 $225 $0 $0 2.18 Street Pole Banners EA $400 $600 s0 so a Assumes standard sirect light pole already installed cost includes brackets and 2 banners. 2.19 TmchCa- EA $800 $1500 $0 $0 2.20 Trec Grates includes frame (4'iA') EA $680 $750 $0 so e 2.21 Tree Guards (Powder Coated ) EA $325 $670 so $0 0 - 2.22 Tree Well EA $500 $500 $0 so 0 Includes saw cut of 5' x5' hole 25 cy amended soil, and concrete demo and hauling 2.23 Water Founinin EA $15.000 $50.000 $0 $0 0 Assumes water source is already available at site. I Cost Estimates based on 2005 prim. SF: Square Foot LS: Lump Sum 0 Hizh 2 All Items listed Include Installation costa. EA: Each LF: Linear Foot a Medium Low • underground pedestrian network — a network of pedestrian passageways below the grade of the roadway. A network of tunnels, like that of skywalks /skyways, is often used to connect several large buildings in a central business district or large corporate campus. Past research has shown the effectiveness of grade- separated pedestrian crossings depends upon the perceived effort and time to use it. For example, Figure 41 defines a convenience measure, R, and compares it to the percentage of pedestrians likely to use a grade- separated crossing. The figure shows that 95 percent of pedestrians will likely use an underpass and 70 percent will likely use an overpass if the travel times at -grade and grade - separated are equal (i.e., R =1). Similarly, less than 5 percent would use either an overpass or an underpass if it takes 50 percent longer (R =1.5). 100 0 90 80 w 70 60 50 40 30 a 20 10 �0 O Bridge Journey • SubwayJoumey • 1 2 3 _ Time on Subway or Bridge Route R Time on Alternative Ground Level Route Figure 41. Pedestrian Use of Grade - Separated Crossings (1). 4 I Other studies have shown that pedestrians use grade- separated crossings more often if the elevation change can be minimized or worked into the normal path of pedestrian movement. For example, circuitous ramps are often used for ADA compliance but provide a time- consuming approach for some pedestrians. Although more right -of -way may be required, the site topography at the approaches to the crossing may be able to be modified to better accomplish the elevation change without circuitous ramps. Figure 42 shows an example of a grade- separated pedestrian crossing. This particular pedestrian overpass is located near Texas A &M University and crosses over a major arterial street and an active set of railroad tracks. The pedestrian overpass is used heavily during special events (e.g., football games, etc.) and during train passings, but only modestly during other times. Future plans at this location involve reconstructing the intersection to provide a pedestrian undercrossing that gradually slopes to below the grade of the surface street. 45 Perils for Pedes?rians. Pedestrian bridges - What works; what doesn't. Home Episodes Children About TV stations Volunteer What is a peril? WebCasts Links How do I report a peril? Newspaper articles Search Pedestrian Bridges What works; What doesn't. 10124111 8:34 PM Pedestrian bridges remove all conflicts with traffic on the road below. They would seem to be the perfect solution for getting pedestrians across the street. But are they always appropriate? There are three main situations where a grade crossing is not possible and pedestrian bridges are essential: 1) Crossing interstate highways, where stopping traffic is not an option; Pedestrian bridge over I -270 in Florissant, Missouri. Pedestrian bridges are needed when road bridges are far apart. 2) Crossing rivers, ravines, and other natural physical obstacles; Pedestrian bridge across the Androscoggin River in Brunswick, Maine. This historic structure took workers from their homes north of the river to the mills south of the river. 3) Crossing railroad switchyards, where parked trains block the path and moving trains frequently shuttle back and forth on multiple tracks. Pedestrian bridge across a switchyard in Missoula, Montana. The bridge features both a winding ramp and an elevator at each end, and observing platforms for railfans at the midpoint. http:// www .pedestrians.org /bridges.htmi Page 1 of 3 Perils for Pedestrians. Pedestrian bridges - What works; what doesn't. There are situations where a grade crossing is possible, bridge will be used voluntarily by most pedestrians and investment: 1) The road is depressed in a cut, so the pedestrian bridge is at grade level and seems more convenient than descending to road level; This street dips below grade in Lansing, Michigan, to allow a mid -block pedestrian plaza to cross over it at grade. The city also has crosswalks at adjacent intersections where the street is back at grade level. 10/24/11 8:34 PM but a pedestrian will be a good 2) There is a natural "desire line" that can be used for a gradual ramp up to the bridge without switchbacks or detours, such as where a rail -trail crosses a road. The Capital Crescent Trail in Bethesda, Maryland, ramps up to a bridge over River Road. Trail users do not perceive the ramp as inconvenient because it is along their natural line of travel, so most people elect to use the bridge. There are situations where bridges built to replace a grade crossing fail miserably. 1) Long winding ramps, stairs, or elevators, are perceived as inherently inconvenient by most pedestrians when a grade -level crossing is possible. This pedestrian bridge connects Prince George's Plaza with the nearby Metrorail station in Hyattsville, Maryland. The design of the bridge and its environment makes it seem inconvenient to many pedestrians. Half of the pedestrians crossing here cross at grade level in the shadow of the bridge. 2) In addition, because of their expense, bridges are usually for apart. Most pedestrians will not voluntarily accept the added inconvenience of walking ten or twenty minutes out of their way just to get to a bridge, and instead will cross at grade at the nearest convenient location. Rather than create bridges that have both a convenient design and a convenient location, some transportation departments erect fences and barriers to force pedestrians to use the inferior bridges they do build. This Berlin -Wall approach to pedestrian control represents a http:// www .pedestrians.org /bridges.htmi Page 2 of 3 Perlis f6r Pedestrians. Pedestrian bridges - What works; what doesn't. 10/24/118:34 PM failure to understand what pedestrians need. Would a majority of pedestrians use a proposed bridge without being forced to by a fence? If not, the designers need to work harder to improve the postive attractions of the bridge, rather than relying entirely on the negative barrier of the fence. A fence, if used at all, should be a supplement to good design, rather than the only incentive for pedestrians to use a poorly designed bridge in a poorly designed environment. Pedestrian sign from the Manual of Traffic Signs, by Richard C. Moeur Updated November 28, 2002 ® Copyright 1998 - 2002 Home Comments to web @oedestrians.org http: / /www.pedestrians.org /bridges.htmi Page 3 of 3 Below are excerpts and complete emails related to the proposed France Avenue pedestrian bridge. When a response was provided to a question via email, the response is included. FEBRUARY 2011 From: Jennifer Date: February 5, 2011 12:13:41 PM CST To: Wayne Houle Subject: Pedestrian bridge over France Hi, Wayne. I got an email this week asking for an update of the pedestrian bridge over France Avenue. What is the latest? Would this be a good update /discussion for the ETC? Thanks. Jennifer MARCH 2011 From: "Wayne Houle" Date: March 7, 2011 2:32:12 PM CST To: "Sprague, Joshua S" Cc: "Jennifer" "Lorenzo Tunesi" Subject: RE: Pedestrian (bike) bridge over France Josh: We plan on constructing this bridge in 2012. No design has been identified for this bridge and we will have a more complete schedule — including the public process, within the next couple of weeks. APRIL 2011 From: "Jack Sullivan" Date: April 15, 2011 9:23:08 AM CDT To: "Jennifer" Subject: RE: draft agenda for the ETC Jennifer, The France Ped. Bridge and Phase 1 of the bike blvd are projects that I am not prepared to discuss in detail. Wayne is the point person on both of these projects. I'll discuss with him in the next few days and see what I can pull together for next week. may ask to come back with more discussion at an upcoming meeting. Regards, Jack MAY 2011 From: Jennifer Date: May 17, 2011 6:20:13 PM CDT To: Jack Sullivan Subject: pedestrian bridge Hi, Jack. In preparation for Thursday's meeting, I was looking for the Council resolution authorizing staff to submit an application for federal transportation enhancement funding for the France Ave. pedestrian bridge. I could find similar resolutions for other federal transportation enhancement funding applications, but not the pedestrian bridge. Could you please forward a copy or let me know if there is not a resolution? Has this money been received by the city and formally accepted by the Council? If yes, do you have the date for that? I looked, but could not find it. Thank you! Jennifer From: Jennifer Date: May 23, 2011 7:48:08 AM CDT To: Jack Sullivan Subject: Fwd: Pedestrian (bike) bridge over France Jack, Following up on the ETC meeting last week and discussion of the bridge over France Ave., it would be helpful to get information on discussions that have been held to date with Bylerly's, the home store, and (if applicable) Sunrise regarding the bridge/bridge connections; discussions with 3 Rivers about the bridge related to the trail; and a timeline for the public process (see Wayne's email below) and RFQ. Also, the application says funding for the bridge is identified in the 2008 -2012 CIP, but I didn't see it. Is it in the CIP? Thanks. Jennifer JUNE 2011 From: Jennifer Date: June 11, 2011 2:24:53 PM CDT To: Jack Sullivan Subject: ETC agenda/memo Hi, Jack. Two things to add to your memo for ETC: Re: France Avenue Corridor, please ask people to watch the March 20, 2007 presentation on the promenade. They can skip forward to the presentation from the URS consultant - -much of the conversation about the bridges are early in the presentation. After watching this presentation and reading related documents, it is not clear to me whether staff feels that the concept for the bridges was approved at the March 20, 2007 meeting. The motion the council adopted approved "the concept plan for the Promenade and direct staff to 1) develop final plans suitable for bidding purposes; 2) pursue funding for a pedestrian bridge project over France Avenue, as well as additional pedestrian bridges providing Important connections with the Southdale area." Did "promenade" in the sentence refer to the entire concept plan as presented (which included two pedestrian bridges) or to that part of the plan that is specifically the promenade? The staff report and verbal report state that the bridges are not formally part of the promenade. It would be helpful to know staff's interpretation of this. Regarding funding for this project, do you know where the funding for the bridge has been budgeted? An April 28, 2011 Sun Current article says "About $11 million of the total is already budgeted to build a pedestrian bridge over France Avenue and complete two segments of the Edina Promenade walkway to link Centennial Lakes Park to Southdale Center," but I haven't been able to locate the bridge or promenade in the CIP or see where these projects were budgeted. I may not be looking in the right place. Finally, regarding France Avenue, it would be very helpful to know what the county has planned for this segment - -for example, when it is due for any major work, whether there are pedestrian /bike plans for this segment, etc. It would also be helpful to have an overview of any discussions /communications with the county about the bridge and what kind of approvals /process would be needed for the bridge to actually be built. In the March 2007 presentation the consultant indicated that the expanse of the bridge would likely require a support post in the center of France and this would require county approval. don't anticipate spending a lot of time on France Avenue at the Thursday meeting, but to keep the discussion going (and because you indicated at our meeting the RFQ would go out this month) it would be good to have more clarity on the above. Please call or email with any questions. Thank youl Jennifer From: Jennifer Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 5:35 PM To: John Wallin Cc: Scott Neal Subject: HRA budget? Mr. Wallin, Is it possible to get a copy of the detailed HRA budget for 2011 if such a budget has been prepared? I have seen the two -page overview that is attached to the General fund budget but wonder if a detailed budget was also prepared. A related question is whether you might be able to direct me to the page(s) in the CIP where the promenade improvements appear. I have looked, but was not able to find them and may not be looking in the right place. These questions are related to the current ETC discussion on the France Avenue corridor and proposed transportation - related improvements. Thank you very much in advance. Please let me know if you have any questions. Jennifer Janovy From: "John Wallin" Date: June 16, 2011 5:49:35 PM CDT To: "Jennifer" Subject: RE: HRA budget? A more detailed budget was not prepared. Heather had done the portion of the CIP and budget before she left and no further detail was added. The page for the $4,000,000 Promenade project is on page 90 of the CIP but does not include any more detail. The $934,359 in the budget is to transfer funds to the debt service fund for payment of bond principal and interest for the year. Contractual services is mostly payment on TIF assistance and other long standing obligations. John Wallin, Finance Director JULY 2011 From: Jennifer Date: July 19, 2011 9:00:45 AM CDT To: "Jack Sullivan" Subject: Re: etc meeting See below. [Please note: my response is in blue] On Jul 18, 2011, at 11:26 PM, Jack Sullivan wrote: Jennifer, Here is the draft agenda. It is really kind of empty. France Avenue Bridge — Wayne has stated he plans to get an RFP out. ETC should be informed. Questions have been raised that have not been addressed. SEPTEMBER 2011 From: Jennifer Date: September 18, 2011 12:47:14 PM CDT To: Jack Sullivan Subject: ETC follow ups Hi, Jack. A few follow ups from our meeting on Thursday. France Avenue 1) Is there interest in following up with any of the contacts Karen Nikolai suggested? 2) Have you or Wayne followed up to see whether the fed funds can be redirected and whether TIF can be used for at -grade enhancements? 3) Have you or Wayne had formal conversations with Hennepin County about the bridge? Susan Howl From: Katherine Stelberg Bass [mai Ito: kmsbass @gmail.coml EOCT U V F_ u� Sent: Thursday, October 27, 20113:54 PM 7 2011 To: Ly nette Biunno Subject: Proposed pedestrian bridge over France Ave _ ....... Dear City Council members, I am writing to reiterate my opposition to the proposed pedestrian bridge over France Avenue. Though this message represents my own views, there was consensus among my fellow commissioners on the ETC that the city should not pursue the bridge project. My chief concerns are listed below. 1. Many of you know me to be an advocate for improving the city's design and infrastructure to support walking and bicycling. In the years since the pedestrian bridge was proposed, the state of practice of complete streets design and the city's vision for the Southdale Area/France Ave. have evolved. A pedestrian bridge is a design solution for roads that have no viable at -grade crossings and where we don't want to impede the flow of traffic. Drivers know this. Drivers who see a ped bridge are given a cue that they need not watch for pedestrians at grade. Even with improvements to at -grade crossings in other areas along France, I believe the construction of a pedestrian bridge would further exacerbate the challenges for pedestrians who are not in the immediate vicinity of the overpass. 2. We know that most pedestrians will not use a bridge if it adds time to their trip. The proposed location of this bridge does not make sense in that it does not align with the Nine Mile Creek Trail and will serve few residents at a very great cost. 3. The opportunity for the public to weigh in on a project of this size has been inadequate. Should the project move forward, as details emerge I suspect residents will react strongly and negatively, given the proposed location and presumed costs. No one wants a "Bridge to Nowhere" situation, as that may be detrimental to generating public support for long -term efforts to improve conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists. 4. Though it has been repeatedly requested by the ETC, a cost estimate has not been provided. While federal funding may defray some of the costs, it is anticipated that the largest share of the costs would be borne by the city. How much? It seems unwise to move forward on this project without knowing. Further, the city could make significant at -grade improvements with those same dollars that would serve more residents and visitors along the entire corridor. This would be a wiser, more fiscally prudent use of city resources. To conclude, this bridge is an inappropriate design solution given what we have learned in the last few years and what we aspire to be in the next 30 years. I truly believe we can serve pedestrians better than this and look forward to being part of the solution. Thank you. .. ...... . Katherine Bass 6917 Gleason Road, Edina 612 -597 -0714 Susan Howl From: Itai Sher Imailto:isher@umn.edu Sent: Thursday, October 27, 20111:15 PM ;'C4-E To: Lynette Biunno ' Cc: Jack Sullivan OCT 2 7 Subject: Attn City Council: Countryside Road Construction Project Dear council members, I am writing with regard to the proposed Countryside road construction project. People often comment on the beauty of our neighborhood, due to its rustic feel. Adding curbs, as the current project proposes, would take away some of our neighborhood's character. From conversations, I know that some of my neighbors feel similarly. At the recent informational meeting, other neighbors raised similar concerns. One resident pointed out that many of us moved here to begin with because of the country feel and that curbs can become quite ugly when not maintained (if I understand, there is no plan to do so for twenty years). Another pointed out that our neighborhood is called "countryside" precisely for this reason. Similar sentiments probably account for the fact that on the engineer's survey 93% of respondents voted against sidewalks. However, the engineer's survey did not ask us about curbs. I believe that a similarly large percentage of residents would oppose curbs if they were asked. I could be wrong, but there is no way to know unless we ask. If we leave it to individual initiative, then only a small percentage of residents are likely to contact the city council. In contrast, if the city council were to send out a survey on this question to residents, this would generate much more feedback. I believe that 56% of residents responded to the engineer's survey, and if a similar percentage responds on the question of curbs, then we should have a good idea about how the neighborhood feels. I believe that a survey is the best way to inquire about public opinion because it will be unbiased, revealing both the sentiment in favor of and sentiment opposed to curbs, giving everyone an accurate picture of people's attitudes. So I am requesting that you perform such a survey and publicly release the results before the upcoming meeting at which the city council will vote on the project. I am aware that the charge for curbs is not part of the special assessment, but we are the ones who will have to live with them. The city council still has the option to vote for curbs even if a majority or large majority oppose them. But I think that a vote taken with knowledge of people's feelings is better than one taken without knowledge. The results of such a survey would add to the transparency and public accountability of the process, and would also make people feel better for having been consulted on a decision that affects them. Sincerely, Itai Sher 6112 Crescent Dr. Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl From: Barbara Polich jmailto:barbarapolich(&aol.coml Sent: Thursday, October 20, 20119:04 PM R EC E U V E D To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Airplane Noise OCT 2 5 2011 James Hovland " " "' "' " "" Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Josh Sprague Ann Swenson Following is a letter I sent to Rep. Keith Downey yesterday. I request our representatives in Edina participate in trying to control this severe noise problem. Attached to this e-mail are newspaper articles as well as a map of yesterdays flights over our City. Note that the Star Tribune Sept. 22 article states "Keewaydin and Ericsson remain relatively quiet compared with some other neighborhoods in south and southwestern Minneapolis and parts of Richfield and Bloomington. One noise monitor in Ericsson shows it had less than half the excessive decibel level in August as the noisiest locations." We have no airport monitor in our area but I randomly measured two airplanes today - one at 68.8 DB and one at 75.4 DB. 10 -19 -2011 Dear Representative Keith Downey, I request you get involved in the plane noise controversy that has been recently brought out by the Star Tribune (http://www.startribune.com/local/minneapolis/130324373.html) and the people living by Lake Nokomis. The next airport public input meeting is on Tue, 10 -25 -11 @ 7:00 @ MAC General Offices, 6040 28th Avenue South, Minneapolis. The plane noise over Edina this year has been unbearable and has certainly affected my health. The planes start before 6:00 am and have continued beyond 11:00 pm. My complaints to the airport have met with the same answers about wind and that "nothing has changed ". DFL Rep. Jim Davine has become involved in the airport noise problems. Chad Leqve, the Metropolitan Airports Commission official in charge of managing noise and Minneapolis City Council Member Sandy Colvin discovered flight path changes made by the FAA that were not made known to the MAC noise oversite committee. It is outrageous. Since the last week of March (when the foot of snow slid off the roof) I have noticed at times planes going over our home every two to three minutes, continuously, day after day, week after week. I recorded some flights on video with a noise monitor - many over 65 DB and going as high as 78 DB the day I recorded. I cannot sleep at night until the planes quit — usually somewhere around 10:45 pm and I am awakened (as I was this morning) by a plane going over at 5:44 am. I cannot relax or plan activities in my own home. This last hour (Wed. 10- 19 -11. 6:15 am — 7:15 am) seventeen airplanes have gone over. I have been searching for a new area to live as my health has deteriorated due to the issues of constant noise. The MN Dept of Health has documented the effects of loud, constant noises and has limited loudspeaker noise in MN. The planes are exempt, but the health issues are the same. This year I have noticed a lack of animals in and around the pond by us. Noise has also been documented to be detrimental to animals. Planes now turn shortly after takeoff (towards us) to allow more planes to use the runways. This causes flights over areas where homes have not been mitigated. Homes had been mitigated in the 60 — 65 DB areas. We do not even have a sound monitoring tower in this area — an area which was not originally but has now become one of the most widely used for plane departures. Edina used to be a quality place to live and raise a family. No more! The effects of noise from plane after plane, flying over hour after hour, day after day, is destroying the peace and desirability of living in areas of Edina — not to mention the property values. Please get involved and protect our City. Barbara Polich - 6113 Saint Johns Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 Copies to Metropolitan Airport Commission Edina Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Josh Sprague Council Member Ann Swenson For'several months, neighbors and public officials have been frustrated at their inability to get an explanation for the increased noise or a prediction as to how long it will last. The FAA had cited wind conditions and airline scheduling, but residents were skeptical that those factors fully explained the prolonged increase in noise. There's clearly something going on, and nobody's'fessing up to the neighborhoods what it is and why it is," state Rep. Jim Davnie, a DFLer who represents some of the area, said last week. "I've been in office 11 years, this is the first time that airport noise has come up as an issue." The FAA confirmed Wednesday that the near -crash of a passenger jet and a cargo plane last September prompted the new procedure to improve safety. "We had a previous procedure ... that we no longer use," FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory said. "It was discontinued after an operational error." The noise you hear Relatively isolated from airplane noise in past years, the Keewaydin and Ericsson neighborhoods have experienced a sharp and sustained rise in air traffic, according to the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Departures rose 25 percent this year over the same period in 2010. "Plane after plane after plane" is how Candace McCown describes it. "I've been here eight years, and this is the first time it's affected us being outside or with our windows open. It's louder than it's ever been." Keewaydin and Ericsson remain relatively quiet compared with some other neighborhoods in south and southwestern Minneapolis and parts of Richfield and Bloomington. One noise monitor in Ericsson shows it had less than half the excessive decibel level in August as the noisiest locations. But for that area and the adjacent Standish neighborhood, the 1,501 excessive noise "departures" recorded last month at the Ericsson monitor represent a 47 percent increase over August 2010. "We noticed it this spring," McCown said. "Our neighbors like to sit out in their yards and talk to each other. We've had to quit talking from 7 at night till 11." Excessive noise levels increased 42 percent in April and May over the same months in 2010. The pattern began even before residents spent much time outside or had windows open to notice. Noise increased more than 55 percent in January, February and March. The noise stemmed from an increase in flights on parallel runways 30L and 30R, from 16,056 to 20,068 from last year to this year. Other neighborhoods saw no significant change in flights from the runways. The increase may have drawn even more attention from residents because it occurred after a sharp decline in flights over the area in 2010 from the two runways. Those parallel runways handle most takeoffs. Over the years flights departing 30L to head north would fly northwest for a while before making a northerly turn to avoid crossing in front of flights leaving 30R. But the procedure sometimes caused problems. What led to the change A US Airways Airbus with 90 passengers and a Bemidji Aviation cargo plane were departing from 30L and 30R on Sept. 16, 2010. Two controllers instructed them to turn after takeoffs. The Airbus turned, but the cargo turboprop continued flying straight. The jet's collision avoidance alarm went off, and the pilot took evasive action. Less than 50 feet separated the planes. The near - collision was among 21 operational errors at MSP from 2007 through 2010. A Star Tribune analysis showed the number of errors exceeded those at airports in Los Angeles, Detroit, Denver and Phoenix -- each of which logged more arrivals and departures. After the incident, the FAA changed its procedure to avoid having planes cross fly routes. "We felt it was safe at the time; now we feel it is safer to depart ... without any crossover," Cory said. More northbound planes are now departing northwest on 30R and making a quick right turn -- over Keewaydin and Ericsson -- instead of making that turn about a mile west of the neighborhood. Chad Leqve, the Metropolitan Airports Commission official in charge of managing noise, said he was unsure of all the factors contributing to the flights over the neighborhoods before he met with an FAA official this week. That's when he and City Council Member Sandy Colvin Roy, who represents the area, said they were told about the change in procedure. "It kind of came out of the blue," Colvin Roy recalled. "He said this is definitely a permanent change." Pat Doyle - 612 - 673 -4504 A top official in the control tower at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport conceded Monday that the federal government should have revealed sooner that it was sending more flights over some neighborhoods. "When we made that decision ... we didn't realize the impact, quite frankly," said Carl Rydeen, assistant air traffic manager. "We didn't realize the number of flights that would happen." Rydeen offered his assessment at a meeting of the Metropolitan Airports Commission, whose members stressed the need for better disclosure. The commission said it didn't learn of the change - - made after a near -crash about a year ago -- until last month. "Should we have advised ?" Rydeen asked. "We probably should have." Commissioner Rick King told Rydeen it's important "when you do make a change, whether you perceive it to be significant or not, that we discuss it." Flights over the Keewaydin and Ericsson neighborhoods on the city's south side increased by about 25 percent from January through August from 2010 to 2011. Air traffic from a runway closest to the neighborhoods jumped 33 percent. Homeowners began noticing the extra noise in the spring but were puzzled by the cause. The Federal Aviation Administration, which runs the tower, was routing additional departures over the neighborhoods as a safety measure after a near - collision between a commercial jetliner and a cargo plane in September 2010. The routing, which already had been in effect for most flights, reduced the potential for planes to cross flight paths. The FAA didn't tell the Airports Commission and a Minneapolis City Council member about the change until about two weeks ago. While calling the lack of communication "an aberration," MAC Chairman Dan Boivin told Rydeen, "I understand that safety trumps anything.... We just need you to let our communities know, sooner than later." Rydeen explained that because the FAA had already been routing most northerly departures from a runway closest to the neighborhoods, the agency didn't think the additional takeoffs from it would make much difference. "I noticed a substantial and significant difference," said Karl Starr, a homeowner in the area. "There are times now ... I can't have the windows open anymore. That is definitely new." Alternatives to noise - proofing The MAC's noise management says it doubts the increased flights over the two neighborhoods would raise noise levels sufficiently to qualify more homes for noise abatement programs. "Is there anything that the FAA and the tower can do to still maybe decrease noise without putting flights in jeopardy ?" asked Commissioner Paul Rehkamp. Rydeen replied that the FAA was working on a new technology that could allow it to route planes more precisely -- over the Minnesota River, for example -- to avoid some residential areas. He said the technology could be ready in a little over a year. But King said the additional precision could have a downside. "It could be that somebody will get more noise than less noise when we implement that," he said. MAC noise manager Chad Leqve agreed, adding, "I don't hold out a ton of hope in the south Minneapolis area." Pat Doyle • 612 - 673 -4504 Near- collision over MSP means more noise for some • Article by: PAT DOYLE , Star Tribune After months of queries, the agency says it changed flight pattern over south Minneapolis. 88 email A near - collision in midair last year prompted the Federal Aviation Administration to quietly change its takeoff procedures to route more flights -- and noise -- over south Minneapolis neighborhoods outside the official noise zone for Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. The pattern is likely to be permanent. has r Y: ' Edina' �.. gi Ov t .e ,.✓ �" , 4i', Vk Rim �'a., �*' a /s�, •O� ti ,� i ' �j fit' / � I `�,; ` .J,., , Wednesday, 10 -18 -2011 Air traffic from airport. Too quiet about the noise • Article by: PAT DOYLE , Star Tribune Control tower manager says airport officials should have learned sooner when planes were rerouted. z share email Deb Man en ' From: Melissa Madison <Melissa @494corridor.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 20118:42 AM To: Imcwaters @edenpraide.org; Julie Wischnack; citycouncil @cityofrichfield.org; Deb Mangen Subject: for city council packets Attachments: Executive Director report August 2011.xls; Executive Director report September 2011.xis Hello, I am attaching the August and September technical reports from Commuter Services outreach in your cities. Commuter Services is a program of the 1 -494 Corridor Commission, encouraging commuters to use an alternative to driving alone. Please include in city council packets. Thank you, Melissa Madison Executive Director Commuter Services (612) 749 -4494 www.494corridor.org 1 Polar Semiconductor World Data Products Academy of Holy Angels Richfield Farmers Market Commute Information Requests: 162 Pledges to try an alternative to SOV: 131 Zip Code Map: Regis Meetinas with Allies: TDM Consultants /E.D. meetings Commuter Choice Award planning committee Rideshare to Work Month planning committee Commuter Challenge wrap up Misc. Outreach: Commuter Services Executive Director's Report August 2011 Employer Outreach Commuter Fairs (11) Regis - 4401 W. 76th Regis - 7201 Metro Blvd. Fairview Southdale Hospital Express Scripts City of Bloomington - employee appreciation Edina Farmer's Market Liberty Property Trust - 10400 Viking Drive Tech VII Flying Cloud Corporate Campus Westwood IV Shady Oak Business Campus Bike Tune Ups (2) Fairview Southdale Hospital City of Bloomington eWorkPlace World Data F efairs (2) Fairview Southdale Hospital Regis Corporation Presented transit ridership information to property owner of Meridian Crossing Provided significant assistance to Polar Semiconductor on their TDM Plan Worked with Bloomington, Edina and Richfield Chambers of Commerce on proposed route eliminations /reductions proposed by Metro Transit Presentation on our services to the board of directors at the Minneapolis TMO Exploring possibility of partnering with MnDOT on bringing MnPass transponders to our fairs Sent weekly updates on 169/494 project Revised eWorkPlace offering post UPA funding Updated website, Facebook Em Mall Commuter Services Executive Director's Report September 2011 Employer Outreach Commuter Fairs 21 eWorkPlace 3 (5) Normandale Community College World Data Products A' 1; Supervalu Medica MN School of Business (2) Delta it Ines (2) Starkey Vesta Valuation Normandale Community College Regis 7151 Metro Blvd. Starkey Regis 7101 Metro Blvd. efairs 6 American Medical Systems Supervalu Olympic Place Normandale Community College Quality Bicycle Products Southdale - Back At It event in rotunda Quality Bicycle Products Toys R Us Bloomington Transition Center UnitedHealth, Famous Daves - Whitewater Southdale Starbucks (regional office) Park Nicollet - Oakview Starkey Supervalu Commute Information Requests: 421 Pledges to try an alternative to SOV: 347 Rowland Pond Acist Medical - Fuller Road Best Buy Mailings: 2,000 Rideshare Promotion Westwood Professional Svcs - Prairie View /Anagram Drive CC Thank You letter to employers Richfield Farmers Market JEdina Farmers Market Bike Tune Ups Meetings with Allies: Richfield Farmers Market TDM Consultants /E.D. meetings Commuter Choice Award planning committee Rideshare to Work Month planning committee Coordinating a regional eWorkPlace application to CMAQ Fall Bike to Work Week planning committee Misc. Outreach: Provided significant assistance to Normandale Community College on their TDM Plan Staffed "Kick Gas" table at State Fair to promote alternative transportation Provided 1-494 road closure details to Richfield Chamber of Commerce Chamber of Commerce to promote Rideshare to Work Month, our Winter Bicycle Commuting class, Fall Bike to Work Week Working with the Bloomington Attended city of Bloomington South Loop transit partners meeting Attended national Association for Commuter Transportation conference in Chicago Attended Comcast ribbon cutting for their Minnetonka call center Met with Courage Center to discuss possible internship Presented eWorkPlace award of recognition to Vesta Valuation Updating preferential carpool parking policies for the companies we manage programs for Sent weekly updates on 169/494 project, updated website, Facebook and Twitter MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 7:03 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston called the meeting to order at 7:03 PM. ll. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston, and Student Members Aderhold and Nolan. Guests present were City Manager Scott Neil, Human Resources Director Lisa Schaefer, and Sue Plaster. Staff present: Susan Howl, Human Services Coordinator. Ill. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS The Commissioners welcomed the City Manager, Scott Neal, and the Human Resources Director, Lisa Schaefer, and introductions were made all around. Manager Neal expressed appreciation for the dedication and hard work of-the Commission. He reported that Director Schaefer will be the new City Liaison to the Commission and that in the near future Ms. Howl would be replaced by new staff support. The new Student Members, Gabe Aderhold and Mackenzie Nolan, also introduced themselves and were welcomed to the Commission. IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Motion by Commissioner Bigbee and seconded by Commissioner Cashmore approving the meeting agenda of September 27, 2011. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston Motion carried. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Motion by Commissioner Cashmore and seconded by Commissioner Winnick approving the consent agenda as follows: V.A. Approve regular meeting minutes of August 23, 2011, correcting the last sentence in Item VIII: "Commissioners Winnick and Finsness will meet with the City's Park and Recreation Director, John Keprios, to discuss the incident." Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston Motion carried. Vl. COMMUNITY COMMENT Sue Plaster, a member of the community, was welcomed as a visitor to her fourth Commission meeting. She shared that she has been impressed by the Commission's energy and desire to work together to resolve challenges. She encouraged the Commission to be a role model to the other commissions regarding how to address conflict and tensions. Director Schaefer remarked that it is important for the City to focus on training and relationship building for the City Council appointees as they begin their work on the boards and commissions. Vll. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VILA. BIAS /HATE CRIME RESPONSE PLAN UPDATED Commissioner Winnick reported that he had recently met with Jeff Long, Police Chief, to begin the annual review of the Commission's Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan. The Chief will follow up with recommendations for the revision of the first and second sections of the plan's process. Items discussed were: • An inadvertent disclosure of a Police report • Follow -up information on the apprehension and conviction of the spray painting of local churches by an individual Community education and information sharing: new Hindu temple, Jewish cemetery's fence removal, and the Islamic community A proposed By -Laws amendment regarding non - disclosure of confidential information Commissioner Winnick shared that the Police Department has been reaching out to build positive relationships in the community. The Commissioners questioned ways to help the Police Department with community education, special events, and to collaborate in planning a city -wide picnic. Commissioner Winnick shared a draft new Section 9 to the Commission's By -Laws that pertains to confidential communications and exceptions. A third paragraph might be added which would deal with a closed Commission meeting. If approved, the current Section 9 of the By- Laws —By -Laws and Rules —would be renumbered as Section 10. Motion by Commissioner Winnick and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee to adopt the new Section 9 to the By -Laws at the October meeting upon study and approval by the Human Resources Director. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston Motion carried. VII. B. ALLEGED BULLYING INCIDENT DISCUSSED Commissioners Finsness and Winnick recently met with the Park Director, John Keprios, to discuss a bullying incident within the Hockey Association's program which had been reported at the "Reflections on Bullying' event last April. Mr. Keprios shared the City's bullying policy, which will be forwarded to the Commission, and indicated that he would contact the Hockey Association regarding the bullying incident. Director Schaefer will investigate whether there are any additional City contracts regarding bullying and report back to the Commission. VII.C. "BULLYING PREVENTION MONTH" PROCLAMATION APPROVED Commissioner Finsness reported that October is National Bullying Awareness Month. Because anti - bullying is the Commission's theme for the year, she shared a sample proclamation which could be prepared as a local proclamation for the City of Edina. Motion by Commissioner Finsness and seconded by Commissioner Cashmore to prepare a proclamation for the Mayor to read and for Council to adopt at its first City Council meeting in October. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston Motion carried. City staff will send the proclamation to the School District. It was suggested that this item be added to the 2012 Work Plan for August. Student Member Nolan recommended sharing the proclamation with the 212 Leadership Group, the members of Dare to Be Real, and the Gay- Straight Alliance. VII.D. EDINA COMMUNITY COUNCIL MEETING DISCUSSED AND NEW REPRESENTATIVE APPOINTED On behalf of the Human Rights and Relations Commission and to fill in for Commissioner Finsness, Commissioner Winnick attended the 2011 -12 kick -off meeting of the Edina Community Council. He reported that Amber Cameron is the new Director of the Edina Resource Center. At the meeting, the members of the Council had discussed the upcoming School Referendum, the work plan, census data, and how to use smaller resources for the greater need. Motion by Commissioner Finsness and seconded by Commissioner Bigbee to appoint Commissioner Winnick as the new Commission representative to the Edina Community Council. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Chair Kingston Motion carried. VII. E. CITY -WIDE PICNIC DISCUSSED Commissioner Cashmore shared that both Council Member Sprague and Mayor Hovland had approached him about the Commission sponsoring a City -wide picnic. Their ideas and those brought forward by the Commission included: using ethnic food vendors at a large community picnic, a collaborative event with the Police Department and /or Park and Recreation, and tying it in with a popular and pre- existing City event. Commissioner Cashmore will follow up with Council Member Sprague and Mayor Hovland for clarity and 1 guidance. VII. F. WORK OF THE HUMAN SERVICES TASK FORCE REPORTED Having been appointed to serve on the newly - created Human Services Task Force, Commissioner Stanton shared the process and the work being done. Five advisory commissioners makeup the Task Force: Ann Braden from the Transportation Commission, Colleen Curran from the Heritage Preservation Board, Carolyn Peterson from the Community Health Committee, Louise Segreto from the PaA.Board, and HRRC.member Russ Stanton who was elected Chair ofthe group. Having studied the nine proposals for human services in 2012 amounting to $128,477, the group met on two consecutive Wednesday evenings in September to review the proposals °and conduct a hearing: for the providers. The third meeting will be to draft a proposed 2012�,human services budget in the amount of $81,278, representing a two percent increase over the current year's funding. Thereafter, the Task Force will go before the City Council at a work session on October 41n to present and discuss the proposed human services budget for 2012. VII.G. EDINA DAY OF SERVICE DETAILS SHARED The Executive Director of Connecting With Kids (CWK), Heather Haen Anderson, had provided an e-mail with news for boards and commissions'regarding the'Edina.Day of Service to be held on Saturday, October 151H CWK is a City -wide initiative to support asset development in the youth of Edina. The event is all about providing service to the community in'collaboration with the schools, churches, civic organizations and individuals., The website— connectingwithkidsedina.org —will be up and running with updates for service projects and the latest ideas. VII.H. TAPED MEETING IN NOVEMBER DISCUSSED Because the November Commission meeting will be its annual meeting -and broadcasted on cable TV, ideas for creating the meeting agenda were shared: • Introduction of Commissioners • Census data update • Domestic Partnerships • Anti - Bullying initiative • Days of Remembrance • Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan It was suggested that the Director of Hennepin South Services Collaborative and the new Director of the Edina Resource Center_ attend and highlight demographics and census information in a PowerPoint presentation. Motion by Commissioner Winnick and seconded by Commissioner Newell to create an agenda at the regular meeting in October for the November Commission meeting; which focuses on past accomplishments. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Newell, Seidman;.Stanto'n, Winnick and Chair Kingston Abstain: Cashmore Motion carried. Vlll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS No correspondence or petitions were received. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBERS' COMMENTS • Commissioner Stanton reported that he had communicated with the City Manager and the City Attorney regarding the Commission's ability to advocate /educate during the upcoming dialogue about the marriage constitutional amendment. The advice received was that HRRC could take a position and adopt a resolution pertaining to.the subject but could not expend public funds advocating its position. In addition, HRRC could host an educational forum as long as multiple points of view are presented. Commissioner Stanton recommended that this be discussed as part of next year's Work Plan. • Chair Kingston reported that she will prepare the League's GLBT Resolution to present to the Edina City Council for approval. She also shared that 13 Minnesota cities have now passed a Domestic Partnership Ordinance and that she will be attending a November meeting in Plymouth to discuss creating an ordinance. • Commissioner Finsness shared that the film "The Bully Project" could be considered as the topic for the next Edina Dialogue. This film is a new feature - length documentary that follows "a year in the life" of America's bullying crisis and offers an intimate look at how bullying has touched the lives of five kids and their families. It stimulates the concept of a grass -roots movement to prevent bullying through new school and community initiatives including campaigns, social media, and video projects. X. STAFF COMMENTS There were no comments. Xl. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Kingston declared the meeting adjourned at 9:20 PM. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC, October 25, 2011. Susan Howl, HRRC Staff Liaison Jessi Kingston, HRRC Chair MINUTES:OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Schold Davis, Thompson, Braden, Schweiger, Housh, Nelson, Janovy, Bon neville,'McKlveen, Bass APPROVAL OF MEETING..AGENDA,Chair Janovy proposed to change the meeting agenda as follow: moving ° the presentation. by Karen - Nikolai ahead of Traffic Safety, and adding an October meeting date under Chair and Commission Members, Comments. Motion was made..bv = member Bonneville and seconded .by member Braden approving the amended meeting agenda. :Allevoted aye: Mo#iowcarried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 21 2011 The minutes were amended as follow: page 2, paragraph 2, under France Avenue corridor update /pedestrian bridge: strike Parklawn and change 'couple'to'three: Motion was made by member Thompson and seconded by Nelson to approve amended minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Karen Nikolai — Hennepin Department of Housing. Community Works. and Transit France Avenue Corridor Study s. Nikolai said she is with Hennepin County in Public Works in the department of Housing, Community Works and ?ansit. She said the Corridor Study was conducted as part of a community works planning grants in 2008: She said - ommunity Works has been around approximately 15 years and serves to stimulate employment development; build bridges for affecting planning and implementation; maintain and improve natural systems; to strengthen communities thru connections and to enhance the tax base. Regarding this project, Ms. Nikolai said Hennepin County called for proposals in 2008 with them providing the planning grant and Edina received one of the grants and URS (Kathryn Ryan) was hired to work with her and Heather Worthington over a 5 -6 month period. She said the purpose of the study was to look at land use planning along France Avenue, knowing that it is an 'A' minor arterial and matching this with the Comp Plan which states "...defines France Avenue.as the central spine of the Greater Southdale District and calls for a.development of urban design framework for primary roadway corridor such as France. Avenue. Potential' improvements call for pedestrian amenities and landscape improvements" Ms. Nikolai said 'this is the t purview that Ms. Ryan- used to develop the study. She looked at existing conditions to.see what could be done to match what the City was looking for while working in the existing, right -of -way. She.said various options were presented to -the City to decide what to do and how to go about implementation and Hennepin County's involvement ended. Ms. Nikolai was asked if the City wants to pursue the study what the procedures are. She said the City would work with one of two departments in Public Works (environmental, service and /or housing community works in conjunction with transportation) depending on what is being done. She said projects that Community Works were involved with include Lowry Avenue which was redesigned from four -lanes to two - lanes, turn lanes and bike lanes; Humboldt Avenue which included removing housing as part of the roadway redesign; the Midtown,Greenway; bridge over Hiawatha Avenue; and two current projects include Hiawatha - Minnehaha intersection which is in design to make it safer for pedestrians; and ithwest LRT Corridor is the newest to become a Community Works project. She said usually projects go to Hennepin )unty board for approval and that the head-of Community Works, Patrick Connoy, could speak more to this. She said if TIF (HRA) money were to fund this project it be more in the realm of Community Works. Some other possible funding sources for inexpensive items are Roadside Enhancement Partnership Program (REPP) for things such as pedestrian level lighting and some vegetation; and Transportation Enhancements at the Met Council but it is being held up in the senate. Ms. Nikolai was asked why Complete Streets approach was used for the study and she said this approach in conjunction with land use, goes hand -in -hand to make it more appealing instead of having parking lots adjacent to the corridor. In reference to the pedestrian bridge, she said it could end up being used by only one person. Chair Janovy said the ETC has discussed this and other options such as sidewalks and crossings. Ms. Nikolai said she believes they have planning studies money available for 2012 and encouraged the City to apply for a capital improvement program grant for a deeper study of France Avenue. Additionally, she said it does not cost much to do a charette to look at different options with the community or actually going on site with construction cones and staging various layouts so people can see what it feels like. Chair Janovy said this is the first time that they are hearing how the study came about and how Community Works works She said there is a sunset date of March 2012 for the federal funds which is puts them in a tight timeline. Ms. Nikolai suggested contacting MnDOT's Bicycle and Pedestrian section who could talk about successes and failures of pedestrian bridges and also MnDOT's newly formed Scott Bradley, Director of Context Sensitive Solutions for MnDOT, to help the ETC inform their decision. Traffic Safety Report of September 7. 2011 Section B. 1. The policy on the web that shows 500 vehicles per day is not updated; it should be 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours said assistant engineer Sullivan. Streets with an issue that does not meet volume are addressed separately using engineering judgment. Section C.2. & 3. Chair Janovy said the NTMP is the only Council prescribed way of dealing with traffic calming and asked if there is a different way of handling these in practice to inform them. Mr. Sullivan said they should not have said the CJ above listed items needed further study. He said item 2 was taken off by the requestor and item 3 should have included contacting Hennepin County. Chair Janovy asked that the intersection at Vernon Ave and Interlachen Blvd be added to a future agenda for discussion. Member Nelson said it is being reviewed as part of the Grandview Small Area Study and chair Janovy added that it was looked at as part of NEETS. Section D. 2. Revised to say 'Seven traffic counts were conducted.' COMMUNITY COMMENT None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Safe Routes to School Conference and Fundine Update Member Bass said Safe Routes to School is a federally funded program for infrastructure and non - infrastructure to create safe routes for students to school. She said their goal was to make a connection between safe routes and livable communities. Workshop tracks included the 5 "E "s — education, enforcement, engineering, encouragement, and evaluation; as well as building partnership; youth engagement; policies, etc. She said attendees from Edina included a parent from one of the elementary schools, couple ETC and BETF members, and the City Engineer, and overall attendance was approximately 600. Member Bass said since not everyone attended the conference, she has a contact that could attend an ETC meeting to give a presentation. This will be added to the October agenda. Mr. Sullivan said the South View Middle School campus sidewalk funding application was not approved. Of 82 applications, 16 were approved and he will be reviewing the ones that were approved. 2 Transit for Livable Communities — Bike Boulevard Schedule Update Mr. Sullivan said the city manager sent a letter to TLC expressing the City's commitment to the project. He said the `imeline for the project is to hold an open house on October 6 and a public hearing. in November. For clarification, chair ,novy said the ETC's October meeting will not be a public hearing but `residents can attend and comment on the iroject. Commission Recommendation Process Mr. Sullivan said the form was reviewed and approved by city manager Neal and assistant city manager Kurt. Chair Janovy said the form would be completed by members who would'volunteer to write the summary of information. Motion made by member Bonneville and seconded by member Schold Davis that the ETC approves this form as the document which is used for . forwardine - information to the City Council of the ETC's position with procedures All voted ave. Motion carried. Living Streets RFP Update Mr. Sullivan said staff continues-to work on the proposals for Living Streets and France Avenue Corridor, and they will be routed to the ETC for review. Transportation Options Committee Member Schold Davis said she spoke with Sue Weigle, Senior Center, who is willing participate and suggested including Susan Howl. She said Sue said there is a lot of history of looking at transportation options and asked about compiling the documents for review. Three people have applied so far with experience on health commission,. steering committee andlplanning commission (Dan Gieske, And Brown and Hope Melton). Other participants would be Human Rights and Relation (Susan), Senior '.inter (Sue), and Planning Commission (Arlene). .Aotion made by member Schold Davis and seconded by member Braden for approval of the six members All voted ave. Motion carried. 2012 Proposed Street Reconstruction Update — Residential and State Aid Mr. Sullivan said residents were invited to an open house for the 2012 assessable projects and 103 residents attended. 2013 open house is also scheduled. The next step will be mailing a questionnaire to 2012 residents, followed- by individual neighborhood informational meetings. A map of the State Aid street projects was handed out. Mr. Sullivan was asked how, Complete Streets fits in and he said reviewing for possible addition of sidewalk. Additionally, he said he anticipates having therfeasibility reports to the ETC in November for review and feedback. Discussion ensued about when the,ETC should give input or become involved in this process.. Is it before the public hearing? Should input be given to Council or to staff? Member McKlveen said plans can change by only a -few people getting others to sign a petition. Chair Janovy said they need a policy in place and if there is pressure to go in a different direction, evaluate the pressure. She said further that if the plans adhere to policy document, maybe there should, be procedures for handling a challenge. Member Thompson said if sidewalk is part of the Comp Plan a couple residents should not be able to toss it out and Member Schold Davis said Co m plete. Streets will never be implemented in this way. Member McKlveen said he attended the 2012 open house and he said Mr. Sullivan did a good job addressing concerns before they were expressed. He said why the work was being done and how the process works were clearly stated which made the Q &A session easier. He said further that he drove all four neighborhoods and 3 of the 4 clearly need to reconstructed. Student Update N Student member Schweiger said he is a junior at Edina High and have been taking engineering classes at the high school and had a civil engineering internship at MnDOT this past summer. He said his interest is engineering. Student member Housh said she is interested in Safe Routes to School because they've just built a round -about at her school because of traffic issues. She said it is working but some people do not know how to drive it properly. Her school is in Mendota Heights. Bike Edina Task Force Update Chair Janovy said Edina Police Chief Jeff Long visited to talk about bicyclist not stopping at stop signs and the BETF said to issue them tickets. Grandview Small Area Study Update Member Nelson said people were selected from different companies to form the consulting team and they will be meeting with them on 9/21. Some issues are multi -modal access to and thru the district; multi -modal circulation within the district; park and ride role; rail and /or mass transit options; connections across TH -100 and reconfiguration of the highway ramps; bus garage alternatives; and infrastructure issues. Chair Janovy said she sent the chair a copy of the Living Streets policy because they are planning on using this approach. 44th and 70th Streets Update Both projects are on schedule and should be completed by mid - October. W. 70th is in phase 3 which is West shore to TH- 100; it is open to local traffic; pedestrian flasher going up at West Shore; and half of the signal is up at Wooddale. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Janovy welcomed new student members Housh and Schweiger. Member Bass suggested adding an item to the agenda to hear from student members. Consensus was reached to add this as an agenda item under Reports /Recommendations. Member Nelson noted that the Southwest LRT was moved into preliminary engineering; and that at crosstown and France there is a new sign that conflicts with the old sign which is still in place. Mr. Sullivan will pass this on to MnDOT. Member Bonneville passed around a concept plan for crosstown where Valley View goes underneath for review and feedback, relative to the bike lane. Member McKlveen requested that the timing of the traffic signal at E. Bush Lake and & 78th be looked at because the left turn only lets about three cars through at a time. Mr. Sullivan will pass this on to the City of Bloomington. Member Schold Davis has information on AARP Report for Planning Complete Streets for Aging in America. Chair Janovy asked about Complete Streets workshop and Mr. Sullivan said he is still working on scheduling it. She asked if a flasher is warranted for the crosswalk at 50th next to City Hall. Mr. Sullivan said he did not know offhand and would look into it. STAFF COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. 4 /A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 16, 2011 7:30 AM L CALL TO ORDER Chairman Goergen called the meeting to order at 7:32 am IL ROLLCALL Answering roll call were Members Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Goergen, Kojetin, Lefler, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz III. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS III A_ REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROPOSED DESIGNS Mr. ,Kost and Ms. Anderson gave a presentation of the site and went over the key attributes. Member Schwartz pointed out that the committee has voted on the five military emblems and will not be including the Merchant Marines emblem. Mr. Kost informed the committee that they have been trading phone calls with the people from the Watershed District and thinks they are going to be okay with regard to that. Mr. Kost and Ms. Anderson went over how the plaza will fit into the park and passed around some granite samples. Member Schwartz asked how high the granite base will be to which Mr. Kost replied currently they are suggesting the sculpture base be approximately six feet high and the eagle with the wreath approximately another six or seven feet above that. Mr. Kost indicated that Mr. Keprios had made a great suggestion that rather than etching the service emblems into stone have them in a cast bronze and showed an example. Mr. Kost proposed to the committee a very serious yet simple bench. He-pointed out how the benches would be a very sustainable wood, affixed to the ground and would be extremely difficult to vandalize. Mr. Keprios pointed out there may be some wisdom in leaving spaces for additions in the future rather than feeling everything needs to be done at- this.time. Mr. Kost explained to the committee they now. need to get closer in working with Mr. Eccleston on refining the .whol.e wall. feature, how the eagle sits; what kind of design the eagle is and whether r it will be Made of steel. or bronze. He stated they are kind of honing in on bronze because they feel.that steel requires' more maintenance as well as it shows :weather more. He added that obviously there will be some adjustments made to the plan. Member Schwartz stated at the last meeting he expressed a concern about the memorial becoming a playground for kids and throwing balls; etc. 'He noted that for the record he is satisfied that the memorial will be over six feet and does not think it will become an issue. Mr. Keprios stated that he knows the committee had sent him on a charge to request that Mr. Kost have two or three different plans;'however, he met with Mr. Kost and Ms. Anderson and agreed that it would be counterproductive and too costly to come up with three completely different plans. If the committee doesn't like the direction of this plan and feels they need to go in a different direction they can still, do that; however, they need to'be, mindful of the budget. He stated that Mr. Kost felt. there were enough things to move and shift around with the one plan rather than throwing out too many options and therefore needed to make a judgment call. Mr. Kost commented that, in addition, he knows the committee wants to start fundraising and felt this was the best memorial design for both the program and the site. He also stated that he doesn't think there are three or four different things to come up with that would actually be able to meet the criteria. Member Cardarelle asked Mr. Kost how he felt the benches would stand up after five or ten years. Mr. Kost replied that "IPE" wood is one of the few woods that have proven to be weather resistant. He explained that the metal on the bench is available in either a stainless steel or iodized aluminum so realistically the bench would be around longer than he will be around. He noted that if the committee would like to see something more garden like or modern ormithout a back the committee can think - about and let him know. He added that they did look at using granite benches because they are very traditional with memorials but felt they are very cold and uncomfortable to sit on. Mr. Keprios pointed out another option is to use their standardized park benches which are inexpensive, beautiful redwood or cedar and are easy to repair. Member Kojetin stated that after a year he thinks wood benches look terrible and feels metal benches with a back are the only way to go. Member Lonsbury stated that before they get into any more detail he wants to be sure that he understands correctly that the objective of this meeting is to look at the overall concept and at their next meeting they will get into a lot more into the details. Mr. Kost replied that some of the details will be coming from the committee in terms of the number of names, etc., but right.now he wants to make sure that the committee feels that the shape, position of the overall design and where they've place the elements is meeting the needs and is something you are happy with. Member Lefler stated that he has a concern of are they creating a skate park and if so is there anything that can be done about it. Mr. Kost replied that he doesn't think they are and the reason is because part of why they are suggesting the design they have is that it's very formal and what he would call more of a reverence kind of place. He stated that he doesn't think it poses the kind of challenges that skateboarders are going to necessarily opt for. In addition, some of it is going to be up to how it's policed and who inhabits the space. Skateboarders are going to feel out of sorts when there are adults all around. Mr. Kost pointed out that one thing they haven't suggested right now is a lot of devices to make it skateboard proof and noted that other than traveling on the pavement and the two stairways there really .isn't much there for skateboarders to do. He commented you need to know about skateboarding to prevent skateboarding and went through a few suggestions for anti- skateboard protection. Member Kojetin commented about having to go by the restrooms to get to the memorial which he feels isn't an ideal location to come into the memorial. He asked Mr. Keprios if there is any thought about expanding the restroom facilities. Mr. Keprios replied there has long been a need to upgrade the restrooms; however, but he does not intend for that to be part of this fundraising effort. Mr. Kost indicated that they did look at another option of coming out of the parking lot from another direction as the connection goes to the north but it starts to become redundant with the connection at 50`'' Street. He stated that he personally finds it to be an attractive building and the fact there are restrooms in it is very convenient. He noted that he doesn't find it offensive in the sense you are going by port -a -potty. In addition, they are also trying to be mindful of what you currently have and build off of that. Member Lonsbury made a motion seconded by Member Lefler to accept the concept plan with the double star paving option as their intended design concept for moving ahead with fundraising. Ayes: Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Goergen, Kojetin, Lefler, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz Motion Carried Mr. Kost informed the committee that they have amped up the sculpture number from what they had initially told the artists, which was $40,000, to now $50,000 because they don't know when it's going to actually be built. He stated that costs are going up and learned from Mr. Eccleston that steel is going up even higher which is another reason they would recommend bronze and not steel for the focal point. 2 Member Christiaansen commented that in looking at the original rendering his thought is that it's a little open and he likes the idea of the black columns on the side because he feels it encloses the space a little bit more. He stated that he doesn't know if it's something they could maybe develop later on because he knows it's a matter of budget but if the budget was there he thinks they would be nice to have in place. Ms. Anderson replied that when you look at the cost they've actually listed those as options and noted that they can definitely be added. Member Christiaansen stated that it might make sense for them to have ideas on what they would like to put on them as far as quotes or something if they do end up having them. Member Schwartz indicated that he also likes the concept. Member Reed noted that he thinks there is a danger of having too many quotes.and personally feels you can over quote yourself. He commented that even for them to pick a few quotes will be pretty tricky. Member Reed stated that another small detail they are going to have to agree on is how they are going to line up the five service emblems such as by age or alphabetical, etc. Ms. Anderson asked regarding'the columns is that something that as they are developing and refining the plan that the committee would actually like to see on the plan or is it something to keep in the estimate that could be looked at in the future. Member Lefler stated that he would like to see them there because in terms of going to major donors and telling them'they are going to get :a bench as recognition is a little weak. If they put the columns in now it won't look like an afterthought for donor recognition away from the memorial. He indicated that they may or may not use them but they are in the plans and can be presented as a complete thought which he thinks would be helpful. Member Lonsbury commented that he is in agreement but he still likes the benches because by having multiple opportunities to recognize donors there can be different levels of donors: Member Schwartz commented this may be a little too granulose for the meeting but maybe they should consider putting the service emblems at the base of the flag and just put the names of those killed on the memorial so they stand out and maybe put a small number quotes on the sentry markers. Ms. Anderson asked the committee how they felt about putting the emblems at the base of the flags and off the actual memorial. Member Reed replied that he thinks it's apropos to have it similar to what is on the design simply because the eagle is bringing the wreath to all of the service members. If they were to put them on the base of the flags they would have to be placed lower as well as there are only three flags and so there wouldn't be enough space for the five emblems. Member Kojetin stated that he would disagree a little bit because if you put the services under the eagle that depicts the service and they need to include everyone: families, kids, etc., because they have not talked too much about the home front. Chair Goergen pointed out that they have talked about two different plaques: one, honoring those who lost . their lives and the other one extensive verbiage in addition to a couple of quotes thanking the families, community, etc. He noted that he believes it was also mentioned there should be a notation about the future and looking forward, the legacy. Member Lonsbury asked the chair if it was his intention for the group to try to draft what the copy is going to be on the individual markers or is there a subcommittee that has already been assigned to look at how many words there are and size, etc. Chair Goergen replied no one has been assigned to this; however, he has been taking some notes and has some ideas they could start with and modify as needed And he would be willing to do that. He stated that separate from the quotations he is talking,about the acknowledgement of the KIAs and how they may be mounted by war or whatever and quotes and other verbiage they had talked about on a second tablet. Mr. Kepri,os suggested they give it to the Design/Architecture Committee and have everyone funnel their ideas to this committee for them to be able to propose something at the next meeting. Chair Goergen stated that he would be willing to do this as a subcommittee of one because he has collected some thoughts. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks that assignment should go to the Design/Architecture Committee. Member Schwartz informed the committee that while doing his research he has come up with some amazing quotes from people that he would be glad to share and then the committee can decide what they would -like to do with them. 3 Member Lonsbury indicated that coming from the advertising world it is one thing to develop the content of the words and doing research etc. However, it's another thing to decide how big the words are when you do the design and the layout and which order everything goes. It's the design and the figuring out how it's going to look and where it's going to go and how the elements are grouped. Right now it's not so much the content but how it's going to look on the monument and how big it will be and what type the face will be, etc. Mr. Keprios informed the committee that a Park Board member mentioned a concern to him as to whether or not the committee will be proposing that they leave space to add names in the future. Member Schwartz replied that he thinks they have to. Mr. Keprios suggested adding some verbiage to the effect that says we honor all of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice and for all of those in the future and just leave it at that. Mr. Keprios pointed out there is a concern of who is going to make the decision in the future and what will be the criteria. He noted that it can go either way; criteria could be provided so that the Park Director in place at that time can make that call. He stated that he doesn't think it's their intent to keep this committee a committee forever. Member Schwartz replied that he thinks this was brought up in one of their first meetings. He noted if the monument is going to stand for 100 to 200 years it's naive to think there are not going to be other names up there. He commented that he thought the committee had agreed that the Park Director at that time will make that decision with approval from the Park Board or whomever because he doesn't think they just can't close that off. Member Schwartz informed the committee that in the book he is writing he does give credit to the Merchant Marines which acknowledge the value of their service. He noted if any issues were to come up regarding this he thinks they are covered. Member Kojetin noted that there are few evergreens that he thinks should probably be removed in some areas. Ms. Anderson responded that when they have beautiful mature trees that are healthy why take them out. She noted they can be taken out over time but, if they are not being impacted by the construction and are not damaged they feel they should leave them. Chair Goergen informed the committee he was contacted by an officer of the local chapter of the "Daughters of the American Revolution" (DAR) and they would like to give a grant in the area of $1,500 for the American flag. This is something they have done throughout the country for various memorials. He stated that a red flag came up that in addition to the $1,500 was included a cost of $200.00 for a plaque that would acknowledge the DAR for funding the flag. He indicated an option would be for the DAR to come to a meeting to present it formally or should they just let them know because of the signage they cannot accept it because it is their policy there will be no acknowledgements. The committee, however, would be more than happy to accept any monies from the DAR they would like to give to the memorial project and they could even earmark it for one of the flags. Member Lonsbury indicated that he thinks between fundraising and marketing there needs to be a meeting to discuss how they want to promote and handle all of this. He stated it would seem to him it's a wonderful donation and we appreciate the offer but the next step in terms of fundraising is to figure out what they are going to do with the donations and at what level you get your name on a stone, plaque, etc. Mr. Keprios informed the committee that the existing policy that has been approved by City Council states contributions have to be in excess of $5,000 to have any kind of plaque at all. He pointed out there is currently a working group looking at the donation policy that is currently in place so that may change in the near future. Chair Goergen stated that would be a good reason to act now. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks what the committee needs to decide is do you want the DAR to give you a formal presentation or is it mute. He stated that he thinks what he hears is the committee will be coming up with some criteria for donations; however, currently it would be in violation of city policy. Mr. Keprios noted that he will respond to DAR that currently their answer is no, but they would still appreciate any 4 donation and that there are other ways to be recognized to which the committee is currently working on a recognition program. IV. APPROVAL OFMEETINGAGENDA Motion by Member Cardarelle and seconded by Member Schwartz approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Goergen, Kojetin, Lefler, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz Motion carried. V. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA V.A. Approval of tite Friday, August 19, 2011 Veterans Memorial Committee Meeting Minutes Member Schwartz stated there was a typo in the minutes where the name of one of the two people that were added should be "Hansord" not "Hansford ". Motion made by Member Lonsbury and seconded by Member Reed to approve the minutes with the change approving the consent agenda. Ayes: Cardarelle, Christiaansen, Goergen, Kojetin, Lefler, Lonsbury, Reed, Schwartz Motion carried. 7. VI. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS VIA. Fundraising/Treasurer Member Lefler informed the committee that he is meeting with Richard Olson next Thursday to discuss fundraising. He asked Mr. Keprios if it would be possible to get some type of computerized presentation device for the computer or ipad to be able to give a presentation to a potential donor. Mr. Keprios explained they need to get through the public process first before they can launch their fundraising campaign. However, that does not mean they can't start working on a plan and start generating presentations. Member Lonsbury indicated that before they pay an architect to do computer presentations that the city does have staff support and marketing people who can do it. He noted that they need to ask the architect for a digital copy of the printout they were given. He indicated that they should be coordinating to figure out what it is they want and how they want it and then coordinate with staff. He commented that he thinks they need to spend the next couple of weeks figuring out what they are going to say and when they are going to say it. Member Reed asked Mr. Keprios to explain what the public process is at this point. Mr. Keprios explained that they will send out notices to the neighborhood as well as put in the Sun Current that there will be an open house where people can see what the plan is and ask any questions. He noted that the Park Board still needs to decide whether or not they will be holding an open house. He stated that the City Council will then hold a public hearing and if the City Council gives the okay they can move forward. Chair)Goergen indicated that it would be nice if they could somehow coordinate it with Veterans' Day. Maybe the formal announcement of what's approved could take place at the November 15`h1 City Council meeting and at the same time they could announce that the formal fundraising will begin. He added that it would also be'perfect timing to put something in the Sun Current. Meeting adjourned at 9:10 am 5 I MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thurs., Sept. 8, 2011 7:03 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Latham called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call were Members Gubrud, Gupta, lyer, Jennings, Kostuch, Paterlini, Risser, Sierks, Thompson, Tucker, Zarrin and Chair Latham. Staff Present: Jesse Struve and Rebecca Foster 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Agenda was approved as written. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Agenda was approved as written. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT John Dolphin, 5809 Eastview Dr, was pleased to hear that the solar project was approved and would like to join the Energy Working Group. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Working Group members. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Paterlini to delete prospects Alan Glotzman and Scott Weicht from the Energy Working Group. Motion carried unanimously. Motion made by Member Zarrin and seconded by Member Thompson to delete prospects Annie Berge, Scott Davidson, Tim Jordheim, Karl Juhnke and Eric Strobel from the Education Outreach Working Group and Air Quality Working Group Chair Risser requested that Karwehn Kata be deleted from the Air Quality Working Group. Motion carried unanimously. Chair Latham welcomed the Commission's two new student members Tara Gupta and Bevlin Jennings. B. ULI benchmark report. Rick Carter did a presentation on MN GreenStep Cities and Regional Indicators Project plus a B3 Benchmarking data live demo. Commissioner's asked Jesse Struve to request the water usage from Film Tech and Southdale. C. Water Quality WG. Chair Latham did a presentation with photos showing the difference between driveways that used Coal Tar -Based Sealer and those that didn't. Motion made by Member Paterlini and seconded by Member Zarrin to remove section about Sale of Coal Tar - Based Sealer Restricted from proposed ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. Public Comment. Richard Griffith, 7009 Comanche Ct, retired 3M Engineer, presented some history of PAH's. Motion made by Member Tucker and seconded by Member Sierks to approve an ordinance regulating the use of Coal Tar -Based Sealer products within the city with amendment. r Roll Call was taken: Ayes: Gubrud, lyer, Paterlini, Risser, Sierks, Thompson, Tucker, Zarrin, Latham Nays: Kostuch Motion carried. D. Air Quality WG 1. Centrum. Mayor Hovland suggested to Chair Latham that the EEC to propose a resolution to change out the three wood burning Centrum fireplaces to gas. Motion made by Member Zarrin and seconded by Member Thompson to accept resolution as is and add it to the Council Work Session on September 20th. Motion carried unanimously. E. Energy WG 1. Solar panel project. City Hall will receive the Solar Panel Project and Jesse Struve will email EEC Members the bid winner. 2. Solar /wind ordinance amendments task force. The topic was tabled. 3. PACE commercial energy district. Member Sierks gave an update on how the City Council requested the Energy Working Group to write the procedures for the PACE program. F. Recycling & Solid Waste WG. The RSW WG reviewed and incorporated the Haulers' comments on the proposed Refuse Report. Motion made by Member Zarrin and seconded by Member Tucker to delete "per Edina City Code 1300.05 " and insert "as defined in Edina City Code 1300.05 and Edina City Code 705.01 ". Motion carried unanimously. 1. Proposed Refuse Report. Chair Latham did a Powerpoint photographic survey on the success of the Dow recycling bins at Lewis & Pamela Parks. The RSW WG is proposing that the trash can and recycling bins have to be paired in order to reduce contamination in recycling bins and that recycling bins must be placed in all city parks. G. Turf Management Task Force Motion made by Member Zarrin and seconded by Member Thompson to approve Turf Management Plan. Motion carried unanimously. H. Education Outreach WG. Mayor Hovland will be a keynote speaker at Moving Planet on September 24tH 1. October educational program. Move educational program to November and each Working Group Chair should let Member Thompson or Member Gubrud know what topics should be discussed on the panel. 2. Edina Public Works Landscaping. The EEC reviewed Member Gubrud article about HES Program and John Howard's Edina Sun Current article on the Edina Public Works Landscaping. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the two articles. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Eco Film Festival. The topic was tabled. I. City Website. The topic was tabled. J. EEC Website. The topic was tabled. K. GreenStep "Cities. The topic was tabled. L. City Council Work Session. Agenda approved as written. VII. CORRESPONDENCE& PETITIONS VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS 1. -Meeting with Senator:Frankin and Green Step City Mayors. Chair Latham attended and gave an update. IX. STAFF COMMENTS . A. . Jesse Struve 1. EEC budget. ,The $5000 ULI invoice was taken out of the EEC budget, so the remaining balance is $1800. ` 2. Green Corps Intern. No Report., There being no,further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Latham declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Thompson to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca' Foster GIS Administrator IN!J n a ) f rD Iffm r ■� l■■.:�M i 1■: ■■■■■ 0 6 D D C j;L-,uqA,nn_ua�r-Rep�c � r i „w. Dear Friends of Public Health, As a director of a local public health agency, I frequently get asked, "What is Public Health ?" The answer is complicated because we respond to so many community needs. Our services tend to be invisible, until people need them. So what do we do? We prevent disease and injury. We promote health at the individual, family, community and system level. We work with many community partners, including schools, police, social services, non - profits, health care providers and others to coordinate and to make sure services are not duplicated. But even more importantly, we make sure people don't fall through the cracks. Every person counts. Karen Zeleznak, The value of public health services should not be underestimated. Public Health Administrator There is compelling evidence that investments in public health improve community health outcomes. These include reduction in health disparities and decreased mortality, particularly infant mortality, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer. These are the four most preventable health conditions commonly targeted by public health agencies. Without a strong public health system, the medical care system cannot succeed in controlling health care costs or improving health. Because of public health, women living in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield can have healthier babies. Obesity and chronic disease can be decreased. Infectious diseases can be prevented. Families can be better prepared to respond to emergencies. In 2010, we saw the end of the H IN 1 pandemic. We strengthened our work with schools by reaching out to ensure that all students had access to the vaccine. In addition, the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) ramped up its efforts to make our community a place where the "healthy choice can be the easy choice." I'm proud of our staff and the excellent services they provide! To your health! 1 Education Foundation OF BLOOMINGTON le RD VNo Gor and Mug chi I d MMnmm IV Foundation Park Nicollet Park Nicollet Foundation lea7e HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT to our 2010 grant funders Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota Foundation Table of Contents Education Foundation of Bloomington 2010 Highlights 3 Greater Twin Cities United Way Services 15 Homeland Security and Emergency Management Citizen Corps Program McKnight Foundation - Out of School Time Trends in Public Health services 25 Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Medical Response System Community participation 29 Minnesota Department of Health Park Nicollet Foundation 2010 Financials 31 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2010 Staffing 32 - Drug Free Communities Program Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration - Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking Act Grant Thank you to our 2010 grant funders 33 UCare Fund Who we are I Mission I Goals Back wre 2010 Financials Total Revenue $4,477,190 Medicare /Medicaid � $13,425 (.3 %) School Health Services Contracts $ 78,889 (1.8%) Private Insurance Reim bursements /ManagedCare $91,072 (2.0%) United Way Grants $142,580 (32 %) Fees for Services $199,179 (4.4 %) Bloomington Community Health Services $252,890 (5.6 %) Emergency Preparedness Fund $ 448,505 (10.0%) Edina and Richfield Contracts $ 450,786 (10.1 %) City of Bloomington $ 646,672 (14.4 %) State and Federal Grants $2,153,192 (48.1 %) $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 Total Expenses $4,477,190 Infectious Diseases $448,505 (10.0%) Infrastructure $203,582 (4.5 %) Disaster Preparedness now $397,055 (8.9 %) Quality and Accessibility of Health Services $ 733,310 (1 6L4 %) $2,694,738 (60.2 %) Healthy Communities $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2.500,000 31 Census Data Total Population Total Population Bloomington, Edina and Richfield aD n 0 aL CL 0 a`> E z Bloomington ■ 1990 Census 82,893 ■ 2000 Census 47,941 2010 Census - A ' ti 35,228 Edina Richfield Compared to 1990, fewer people are living in Bloomington and slightly more are living in Edina. The number of people living in Richfield decreased in 2000 and increased in 2010. Bloomington, Edina and Richfield make up 15 percent of Hennepin County's population. 4 Census Data Populations of Color Populations of Color— Percent of Total Population Bloomington, Edina and Richfield 0 CL 0 n 0 c 0 C CL 0 a c a� a ■2000 0.4% Black or African American Indian and Asian American Alaska Native ■ 2010 Other Race Two or More Races Latino The graph above shows Bloomington, Edina and Richfield are becoming more diverse. The Latino population had the greatest increase with eight percent of Bloomington, Edina and Richfield residents reporting their ethnicity as Latino. Black /African American and Other Race categories increased by three percentage points. 5 Kumar Belani Mark Johnson Alan Lifson Carolyn Peterson Francesca Sifferlin, Student Jan Johnson Mary Jo Kingston Idelle Longman John Beuerlein, Student 2010 Projects • Reviewed role of Edina Medical Consultant and mandatory training for paramedics and emergency medical technicians. • Reviewed emergency response and ambulance services provided by the City of Edina. • Reviewed annual report of Edina school nursing services and food services. • Reviewed and assessed community health services and public health emergency preparedness services provided to the City of Edina by Bloomington Public Health. • Reviewed chemical health programs for students and families in Edina. • Tracked SHIP grant activities for improving nutrition, reducing obesity and reducing tobacco use. • Provided letter of support toward establishing the Edina Farmers Market. Richfield Advisory Board of Health Benjavan Byrd - Warner Betty Gustafson Chris Olson Matt Tietje Callmie Dennis Yazdaan Juma Patrick Suglia Jennifer Turrentine Rhonda Gibson David Knutson 2010 Projects • Continued to focus on Promoting Healthy Communities and Healthy Behaviors through SHIP. • Supported the passage of a city ordinance prohibiting smoking in city parks. • Recognized ten local eateries for their excellence in the area of food safety. • Provided a liaison to the newly created Richfield Bike Task Force. • Supported Richfield Public Schools in organizing and promoting the community wellness expo. 30 1A_1I Ilk 'Ly[yl y[� The Advisory Boards of Health for Bloomington and Richfield and the Community Health Committee of Edina are appointed by their City Councils to study issues affecting the health of residents and to make recommendations to the City Council. Bloomington Advisory Board of Health Alice Chu Gregory Harms Carol Oldowski Allyson Schlichte Michael Dardis Kent Johnson David Olsen 2010 Projects • Reviewed the 2000 -2009 Maternal Child Health Report. • Participated on the Statewide Health Improvement Program Community Leadership Team. • Reviewed initiatives for "New Americans" with Human Services and Public Health Staff. • Presented seven Food Safety Awards recognizing commitment to excellence in the food safety area. • Received regular updates on the SHIP Program. • Reviewed grant- funded activities related to underage use of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. • Reviewed the activities of the Community Emergency Response Team program and plans for the new Medical Reserve Corps program. • Discussed Social Media and its use in Emergency Preparedness. • Provided feedback on the Division's Business Plan and the 2011 draft budget. 29 Percent of Total Population Reporting Latino Ethnicity Bloomington, Edina and Richfield ■ 1990 Census ■ 2000 Census 2010 Census 0 2 CL 0 Q 0 a) Q U a 2.8% 1.2% 1.0% 1.1% r Bloomington Edina 6.7% 1.5% Richfield Since 1990 the percentage of people reporting Latino ethnicity has increased. The increase was smallest for Edina and greatest for Richfield. The Richfield Latino population increased threefold since 2000. Census Data Population 65 Years and Older Population 65 Years and Older— Percent of Total Population Bloomington, Edina and Richfield ■ 1990 Census ■ 2000 Census 2010 Census 21% CL 18% 0 n 0 14% Bloomington Edina Richfield While the senior population in Bloomington is increasing, both Edina and Richfield have seen a 2 percent decrease in this age group. Since 1990, the 65 years of age and older population in Bloomington increased from 10 percent to 18 percent. This population fluctuated in Edina but is higher in 2010 than in 1990. Richfield has seen a steady decline in this population since 1990. Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening U N U C U 0 1347 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 7 28 Women 40+ Health Screening In 2010, 24 of our 1170 clients were diagnosed with breast cancer, and 270 needed further diagnostic testing and follow up. Staff helped these uninsured and underinsured women find medical and financial resources for their treatment. Vulnerable Adults and Seniors Public Health Nurses make home visits to assess for health and safety factors. They also make jointvisits with environmental health sanitarians, police and social services where there are garbage house and vulnerable adult issues. As the population ages, the need for these services increases. 'rends in Public Health services Flu Shots The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention n recommends most peop flu shots. In 2010, H1N: shots were still being giv in the year. In the later h 2010, H1N1 was includ( the regular flu vaccine. ( we saw much less demai the flu vaccine in 2010. Immunizations Public Health provides a safety net for those withc insurance who need immunizations to protec them from diseases such pertussis, tetanus, diphtl measles, mumps and rut 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Census Data Unemployment Unemployment Rates 2006 -2010 Bloomington, Edina and Richfield � Bloomington m a 0 Q E a� c 4.6% a 4.2% 4.3% 3.7% 3.8% K Edina Richfield State of MN 8.0% 5.4% 4.3% 1;io 6.4% 5.6% 7.3% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: http : / /wwvv.positivelyminnesota.com The annual unemployment rate increased for each city from 2006 -2009. In 2009, the unemployment rate was the highest it has been in the last five years. Unemployment decreased for each city in 2010 but was still higher than the years before 2009. Unemployment with loss of health insurance often limits access to healthcare services. 27 8 Minnesota Student Survey Data Alcohol and Tobacco Ninth -Grade Students Consuming One or More Alcoholic Drinks in the Past 30 Days Bloomington, Edina and Richfield 1998 -2010 Y 50 State of MN Bloomington The percentage of ninth - graders � � � Edina — Richfield who reported drinking alcohol in ao�ro the past 30 days is the lowest CU 3o�% o since 1998. Compared to the oh state, percentages in Edina and 20% Bloomington were lower and the l00% o percentage in Richfield was higher. U 0% 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 Ninth -Grade Students Smoking Cigarettes in the Past 30 Days Bloomington, Edina and Richfield 1998 -2010 50 40 °,a CU 30% Z5 20% 0 c 10% a 0% State of MN t Bloomington Edina Richfield 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 The percentage of ninth - graders who reported smoking cigarettes in the past 30 days is lower than in 1998. Compared to the state, percentages in Edina and Bloomington were lower and the percentage in Richfield was higher. Additionally, since 2007 the percentages in Bloomington and Edina decreased and the percentage in Richfield increased. #¢i Breastfeeding at 3 Months of Age in WIC Bloomington, Edina and Richfield (BER) ■ BER ■ State of Ni L o - E � M fn � U •� a� Z U � M 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 9 26 Breastfeeding In WIC WIC recommends breastfeeding for a full year because of its health benefits for mothers and babies. WIC mothers in BER breastfeed their babies longer than in the state overall. Children 0 -3 Years Early Intervention Services Public Health Nurses assess behavioral, growth and developmental concerns and help parents access educational, medical, and social service resources. This is a joint collaborative with four school districts — Bloomington, Edina, Richfield and Eden Prairie. ' 'rends in Public Health services Number of WIC Clients (unduplicated) Bloomington. Edina and Richfield (BER) Overweight Children in WIC o In BER, the percentage of children in WIC age 2 years CU in 29 and older who are overweight CZ N or at risk for overweight W o CU declined from 2006 to 2010. CZ This percentage is lower than o the State's in 2010. a) CU 2 0 Q) 3 ■ BER ■ State of MN 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Cele - ------------------- �w ...without alcohol r .- 16 - �1 �' I W, Spring and summer bring many opportunities for youth to celebrate. Let your teen know you expect him or her to celebrate .. . without alcohol. itus mem s dudpadfor by Bloom from rbe0Ei o�NmoulDrv�Covf o F. 1a Together We Stand Campaign The Together We Stand Campaign urges all in the community to work together to prevent underage drinking. The 2010 campaign promoted safe prom, graduation and summer celebrations with the message "Celebrate without Alcohol." Community partners helped spread the message with posters and flyers. In addition, Bloomington, Edina and Richfield schools mailed the campaign message to over 1,000 families with graduating seniors. A Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration grant funded the campaign. 25 10 Minnesota Student Survey Fruits and Vegetables Ninth -Grade Students Consuming Five or More Servings Fruits and Vegetables Yesterday Bloomington, Edina and Richfield 1998 -2010 50 °b N 40% Y N a CO 30% 0 20% U a 10% 0% State of MN *Bloomington Edina *Richfield 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 A greater percentage of ninth - graders reported eating five or more servings of fruits and vegetables than in 2004. Compared to the State, the percentage in Edina is greater at close to 30 percent. The percentage in Bloomington and Richfield is equal to the State at 18 percent. All together, only about one in five ninth - graders report eating the recommended number of fruits and vegetables. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM ACTIVITIES INCREASED COMMUNITY PREPAREDNESS • Conducted large H1N1 vaccination clinics in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. • Conducted 9 focus groups with at -risk populations to identify barriers to accessing H1N1 vaccinations. • Completed and pilot tested a draft, faith - based, emergency preparedness toolkit. • Trained 82 faith community leaders and 38 faith -based organizations to use the new Faith Based Organizations Emergency Preparedness Too /kit. • Participated in a sheltering exercise with the Red Cross. • Conducted 7 outreach activities to generate interest in Community Emergency Response Team and to promote emergency preparedness. • Conducted focus groups with community - based organizations regardingthe content for a tailored, comprehensive, emergency preparedness toolkit. INCREASED CITY'S CAPACITYTO RESPOND • Implemented the federally- funded Community Emergency Response Team (CERT). • Trained 59 new CERT members from Bloomington and Richfield. • Completed and pilot tested the new Public Health CERT curriculum. • Trained 27 CERT members on Public Health CERT. 11 24 Fq LJ These CERT members are community volunteers trainer in basic response skills by emergency personnel. CERT members are prepared to save lives, prevent the spread of disease, and protect themselves, their families, and their community in the event of a disaster. ��r��rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr l■■■ l■ llll■■■■■ t■ t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■ ■ ■l■■t ■■■ ll ■ ■ ■l■ ■ ■ ■■lll■■ ■l ■t■ - ��a` a.�ni� —�+e�� ■ MEMOS MMM . �o��■■ t■■■ t■ ■ ■ ■ ■llt ■ ■ ■ ■ttlot ■t ■ ■t ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ : "�� •: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■t ■1■ ■11111 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■t ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ / •111 ;. ■ ■■ 111 ■ ■ ■ ■1 ■ ■tt■ ■111111111111 ■1111 ■11 ■11 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■t 1• 1 1 �� . -, ■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■l■l■lll■t ■■■■■tot■■ ■■■l■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■■111■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■t - ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ t■ t■ t■ t■ t■■■ t■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■t 1• 1 .1• ■■ 11■■■ t■■■ tl■ tt■■■■■■ t■■=■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■t tlll■■t■ll■■ttttt■■■■/■■■ ■■■■ 11■■ 11 ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■i t■ ■■■■■■■■■■■t ■ ■■■ ■t ■t ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■tot ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■lt ■■■■■■■■ tt■■■ ■t �t ■11 ■ /1�tMt= ■� ■ ^ ■ ■ ■�■ ■�� ■�� ■ ■ ■ ■■ 111 ■� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■t ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■h1 ■ ■t ■ ■ ■ ■ 11 1 1 1 . '•�" �►� �4 � V . ►- 1 ��■ ►� t rrr� -t i I►� . ■■■■■■t■ltlt■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■tt 1 1 1. � ' 1 �. •-ill I l -f• 1 1 1 1 1 /l L I J 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I !I I I �I 6�- l- 7■■■ito■ ■t ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■t . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■� ■ ■ ■11■ 111 ■ ■■ 1111// ■ / ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■t / • 1.1 111' �(� 1+ . WIs a■ nnrlt■/ r/ t/ n//// C1�/ ��■■■■■■■■■ ttttt ■ttttt ■ ■ ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■tt ■t ■t ■■■ ■1 p�TfM ,> ,. n . r �� 1' 1 r, 'I d 'i ■tt ■ttl ■ ■■ ■tt ■tt ■ ■■ /loll■■ /■■■■■■■■■■ ■1t iian`rl.l�.i.i.1• ■` r` �Vr rdNV�/ LI\r■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ \ ■ ■ ■1t ■■■■ ■l■■■llll■llt■■t■ ■1 ■■■ 1■ t ■ ■ ■ ■tllt ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■lltH ■ ■lttt ■■■ 1■ t■ t■■■ ttt■■ tttt■ tl■ 1■■■■■ ■t ■■■t■ ■■loll ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■tt tttt■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■o■1■ ■1 ■ ■■1■■l ■■t■■ ■ltllt ■t . 1 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiii�i�iiii iiiiii iiiii� • .. .u. •. . .• ss oft�• 4t r.] 4 13 0- Nutritionist, Marianne, a pregnant woman on the WIC program about her diet. WIC provides nutrition education and healthy foods to make an early impact on children's growth and development. CLINICS Bloomington Edina Richfield WOMEN'S HEALTH • BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING #ofclients err■. Sage Program for uninsured and under - insured women age 40 and older. • CARDIOVASCULAR SCREENING #ofclients Sage Plus Program for cardiovascular education. WIC (WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN) #ofclients - - - -- wpm For nutritionally at -risk pregnant and breast - feeding women and children up to 2343 five years of age. Provides nutrition education and food vouchers. i HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT #ofassessments Cholesterol, lipid profile, and total blood chemistry tested at quarterly clinics. One -on -one nutrition education sessions included. 22 Is -,I if i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ / ■ ■tr ■ti \fir ■rr1•r�i�� =.,, :1M 1 '11 -1a ■La " 1 _ II It 7 mCCPM -Mir II u0.1n 10 11I -Zal i.iiii:x: i�-1w■wir ■ ■■ww ■wi ■■ ■■ Fnr Parpnfind and Antimai r-Mid nammminnman U '•• " "•'•'•• "••'• "'•• " " " " " ■ " " ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ "" � Public Health Nurse, Patricia, - - ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■ ■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Edina Richfield immunizes a resident. Low -cost 82 7 23 167 �� ■�� ■�� ■� 998/ �l i immunizations are provided to ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■■■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■■ ■■ ■ ■■ ■■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■■■■•■••••'••■•'■■• ••••••• ■' ■• ■•• ■•'•• ■'• ■•'• "' ■■■ ■■ ■ "' 238 adults and children at the Public ■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ ■■ ■■■ 51/ Health Center on the first and ■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ 148 295 third Tuesdays of the month. t y 61/ 14/ 16/ Other Bloomington Edina Richfield Cities 82 7 23 167 2948/ 998/ 351/ 142/ 1394 233 238 476 92/ 17/ 51/ 96/ 315 45 148 295 61/ 14/ 16/ 107/ 98 20 28 255 82 7 23 167 a's J♦ I W. X& I--k: 1un,n�sl �diiiar`mW66 AI I■■■■■■■■■■ ■m■O insommummsommon 1■■■■e■■■■■■ N l:'l_111r- a��l[: -■IuI 11' "III irt��lrrt rrim■irrrt■■��I.��rtii MITSM-WrIll" a] I■mms■ ■■■■■■■■ some ■■ 1010401 mir�ir■ ■■p�■r� 1w: I I I I ar: I ,M W. :-. ►:1-_1 r• 1 1 �LOct■ou_VA n■•4raS•11had _I.(- 1.L•llJ-■o /o1.e 1,Tani r-'T -i ,T11,Toatd Ta1r- -tr-a mLILLd ;.ALALaL ■LLJ ■.:1i�.L"J s ■ ■ ■ti ■ ■ ■s ■ ■7sr1 ■s ■ ■me ■ ■mm ■■■7.17 ■■■ ■rem ■■A■ ■ ■s ■ ■■ . Iifili:C' C' il- i Y11:1'-ili'lil ■�:1wT�► "!_ Bloomington Edina Richfield 463 166 141 1230 480 399 107 35 37 431 100 187 12 45 NA Public Health Nurse, Bruce, checks a senior's blood pressure and offers helpful advice at a Talk with the Nurse clinic. The clinics are provided monthly for seniors and give information on a number of health - related topics. i i FOR FAMILIES SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES • CHARTER AND NON- PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN RICHFIELD Nursing services for adults and children including first aid, medication administration, consultation and follow -up. # of student contacts /# of adult contacts Vision, hearing, and scoliosis screening. • HEAD START AND FAMILY SCHOOL #of screenings Child health and developmental screening. • SOUTH VISTA/WAVE ALTERNATIVE HIGH SCHOOL 73fami/ies /94 clients Nursing services to students. CHILD CARE CENTER /CONSULTATIONS # of visits /# of centers Monthly health and safety consultations with daycare center staff and directors. HELP ME GROW SOUTH HENNEPIN #ofreferrals/ #ofvisits Families with concerns about their child's (age 0 -3 years) development can access resources for help. Nurses assist families through the process. FOLLOW -ALONG PROGRAM # of children enrolled Helps parents know if their child's (age 0 -3 years) development (playing, talking, laughing, moving, growing) is age- appropriate through periodic questionnaires. VISITS TO FAMILIES • PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE HOME VISITS #ofclients/ #ofvisits Visits made for high -risk pregnancy, post - partum, newborn care, child development, parenting concerns, and help with community resources. • INTENSIVE PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE HOME VISITS #ofclients/ #ofVisits Visits made to Metro Alliance for Healthy Families and Successful Parents And Ready Kids program clients. Program funded by the United Way. • BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOLLOW -UP #ofnewborns Information provided to families with new babies. Invited to enroll in Follow -Along Program. Home visits offered. • COMMUNITY RESOURCE SPECIALIST # ofphone and home visits Bilingual, Spanish- speaking staff provide resources to families. FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAM # of reports reviewed Nurses review police reports to assure families and individuals are linked with needed resources and health care. Program funded by the United Way. HEALTH PROMOTION IN THE COMMUNITY CLASSES AND OUTREACH # ofstudent attendees Directed to students. Information on preventing tobacco, drug, and alcohol use; early sexual activity; teen pregnancy; sexually transmitted infections; and other risk behaviors. Healthy behaviors, such as increasing physical activity and healthy nutrition, are promoted. EDUCATIONAL PRESENTATIONS #of attendees Directedtoparents, adults, communitymembers. Information on healthy behaviors, asset building, limit setting, alcohol, tobacco, other drugs, and laws involving youth. STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRESENTATIONS #of attendees SENIOR HEALTH PROMOTION #of attendees Nurses talk with seniors about preventative measures for healthy aging (at senior centers and senior housing complexes). CAR SEATS # of carseats provided Staff person, nationally certified as a child passenger safety technician, provides car seats and education to assure proper use by parents and children. 17 18